alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Petition for Exemption from HR 658** **- 62; Subtitle B; Section 333** 

**1.** Charles D. Boldin 917 Golfview Ct. Rochester Hills, MI 48307 248
- 330
- 5107 Email: chuck@chumel.com **2.** This petition is for Exem ption from HR 658
- 62; Subtitle B; Section 333 ; Flying a drone for commercial purposes **3.** I am a Home Inspector in Michigan. I am seeking authorization to operate a small drone weighing less than 3 pounds for the purpose of photographing house & building Roof Tops while performing a home or building inspection . The particular drone I have at the moment is a 1.5 pound Parrott AR. The drone would operate approximately 20 feet above the roof top. **4.** A Home owner or prospective buyer would benefit from close up photogra phs of the roof, inaccessible without special equipment & trained personnel, revealing its condition. **5.** Granting this exemption would not affect safety. Flying a small drone 20 feet above a roof top whether in or outside of a control zone would not interfere with local aviation traffic. I hold a Commercial Pilot’s Lice nse (1829468) and I am Instrument Rated. I have an in depth understanding and appreciation of the Federal Aviation Regulations and would not operate a drone in any unauthorized n or hazardous ar eas. **6.** Summary: A petition for Exem ption from HR 658
- 62; Subtitle B; Section 333 has been filed by Charles D. Boldin, a licensed Commercial pilot, for the purpose of photographing roof tops while performing home Inspections. The drone will operate approximately 20 feet above a roof top.
226 So.2d 772

#### Evelyn GOINS et vir v. STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY.

No. 50025.

Oct. 8, 1969.

In re: Oliver Goins and his wife Evelyn Goins applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Vernon. 223 So.2d 435.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal there appears no error of law in its judgment.
Exhibit
10.2


Description
of Cash Bonus Arrangement for Named Executive Officers


·                  Each
named executive will be entitled to receive a cash bonus for 2006 equal to a
target percentage of that executive’s base salary.


·                  The
maximum bonus for our chief executive officer will be 120% of his base salary.


·                  The
maximum bonus for our chief financial officer will be 100% of his base salary.


·                  Two
thirds of the bonus will be based upon the Company’s overall performance, as
measured by the Company’s fully diluted earnings per share for fiscal year
2006.


·                  One
third of the bonus will be based upon each executive’s individual performance,
as measured by factors the Compensation Committee may deem appropriate.


·                  The
overall target percentage may also be adjusted (reduced or increased) based
upon the Company’s actual fully diluted earnings per share relative to certain
specified targets.
#### § 1138.4 Organization of this part.

(a) The content of this part is organized into subparts and associated appendices.

(1) Each subpart provides direction to DoD Components on how to construct one article of general terms and conditions for grants and cooperative agreements.

(2) For each subpart, there is a corresponding appendix with standard wording for terms and conditions of the article addressed by the subpart. Terms and conditions address rights and responsibilities of the Federal Government and recipients.

(b) A DoD Component must use the wording provided in each appendix in accordance with the direction in the corresponding subpart and the authorization in § 1138.5, which permit a DoD Component to vary from the standard wording in some situations.

(c) Table 1 shows which article of general terms and conditions may be found in each of appendices A through L to this part (with the associated direction to DoD Components in Subparts A through L, respectively, as supplemented by the authorization in § 1138.5):

| In . . . | You will find terms and conditions specifying recipients' rights and responsibilities related to . . . | That would appear in an award within SUB Article . . . |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Appendix A | Distinguishing subawards and procurements | I. |
| Appendix B | Pre-award and time of award responsibilities | II. |
| Appendix C | Informational content of subawards | III. |
| Appendix D | Financial and program management requirements for subawards | IV. |
| Appendix E | Property requirements for subawards | V. |
| Appendix F | Procurement procedures to include in subawards | VI. |
| Appendix G | Financial, programmatic, and property reporting requirements for subawards | VII. |
| Appendix H | Other administrative requirements for subawards | VIII. |
| Appendix I | National policy requirements for subawards | IX. |
| Appendix J | Subrecipient monitoring and other post-award administration | X. |
| Appendix K | Requirements concerning subrecipients' lower-tier subawards | XI. |
| Appendix L | Fixed-amount subawards | XII. |

Table 1 to Paragraph (c)
| (logo) ncb  National Cooperative Bank    | 2011 Crystal Drive  Suite, 8oo  Arlington, Virginia 22202 |
|-----------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------|

 

February 6, 2018

 

 

Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Securities, Inc. as Depositor

Attn: Anthony Sfarra

375 Park Avenue, 2nd Floor

J0127-023

New York, NY 10152

 

RE:Annual Statement as to Compliance

WFRBS2013 C12

 

DearSir/Madam: 

 

Inaccordance with the Pooling and Servicing Agreement entered into in connectionwith the issuance of the Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2013-C12,as an authorized officer of National Cooperative Bank, N.A. (the “Co-op SpecialServicer”), I hereby certify that:

 

a.A review of the activities of the Co-op Special Servicer during the precedingcalendar year (the “Reporting Period”) and of its performance under the Poolingand Servicing Agreement has been made under my supervision.

 

b.To the best of my knowledge, based on these reviews, the Co-op Special Servicerhas fulfilled all obligations under this agreement in all material respectsthroughout the Reporting Period.

 

Pleasenote that the annual financial statement will be sent under separate cover onor before March 31, 2018.

 

 

Best regards,

/s/ Karyn Mann

Karyn Mann

Senior Vice President, Investor Compliance

National Cooperative Bank, N.A.
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Thian Hoo Tan, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report of Komag, Incorporated on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended April
4, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Q
fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
operations of Komag, Incorporated.

                                  BY: /s/ Thian Hoo Tan
                                      -----------------------------

                                  Thian Hoo Tan
                                  Chief Executive Officer

I, Kathleen A. Bayless, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report of Komag, Incorporated on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended April
4, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such 10-Q
fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
operations of Komag, Incorporated.

                                   BY: /s/ Kathleen A. Bayless
                                       ------------------------------

                                   Kathleen A. Bayless
                                   Chief Financial Officer

         This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the
extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by Komag, Incorporated for purposes
of Section 18 of the Security Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Komag, Incorporated and will be retained by Komag, Incorporated and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 600.112 Forms for applying for Federal assistance. ( a ) *General.* An application for an award shall be on the form or in the format specified in a program rule or in the funding opportunity announcement. When a version of the Standard Form 424 is not used, DOE shall indicate whether the application is subject to review by the State under Executive Order 12372.
( b ) *Budgetary information.* DOE may request and the applicant shall submit the minimum budgetary information necessary to evaluate the costs of the proposed project.
( c ) DOE may, subsequent to receipt of an application, request additional information from an applicant when necessary for clarification or to make informed preaward determinations.
( d ) *Continuation and renewal applications.* DOE may require that an application for a continuation or renewal award be made in the format or on the forms authorized by paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section.
[74 FR 44278, Aug. 28, 2009]
H. Res. 751

In the House of Representatives, U.S., 

May 16, 2006.

Whereas American Ballet Theatre (ABT) is recognized as 

one of the world’s great dance companies; 

Whereas ABT is dedicated to bringing dance to America and 

American dance to the world; 

Whereas over its 65-year history, ABT has appeared in all 

50 States of the United States, in a total of 126 cities, 

and has performed for more than 600,000 people annually; 

Whereas ABT has performed in 42 countries as perhaps the 

most representative American ballet company, with many 

of those engagements sponsored by the Department of 

State; 

Whereas ABT has been home to the world’s most accomplished dancers and has commissioned works by all of the 

great choreographic geniuses of the 20th century; 

Whereas Dwight D. Eisenhower recognized ABT’s ability to 

convey through the medium of ballet ‘‘some measure of 

understanding of America’s cultural environment and inspiration’’; 

Whereas over the years ABT has performed repeatedly at the 

White House, most recently in December 2005; 
2

•HRES 751 EH 

Whereas ABT is committed to bringing dance to a broad audience and provides exposure to dance to more than 

20,000 underprivileged children and their families each 

year; 

Whereas ABT’s award-winning Make a Ballet program and 

its other outreach initiatives help to meet the need for 

arts education in underserved schools and communities; 

Whereas ABT’s Studio Company brings world class ballet to 

smaller communities like Rochester, New York; Stamford, Connecticut; Sanibel, Florida; South Hadley, Massachusetts; and Winston-Salem, North Carolina; and 

Whereas The Jacqueline Kennedy Onassis School at ABT 

and the ABT’s other artistic development initiatives provide the highest quality training consistent with the professional standards of ABT: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

(1) recognizes and commends American Ballet Theatre for over 65 years of service as ‘‘America’s National 

Ballet Company’’, during which it has provided world 

class art to citizens in all 50 States; 

(2) recognizes that American Ballet Theatre also 

serves as a true cultural ambassador for our Nation, by 

having performed in 42 countries and fulfilling its reputation as one of the world’s most revered and innovative dance companies; and 

(3) recognizes that American Ballet Theatre’s extensive and innovative education, outreach, and artistic 
3

•HRES 751 EH 

development programs both train future generations of 

great dancers and expose students to the arts.

Attest: 

Clerk.
EXHIBIT
32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350 (AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002)





In
connection with this Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report of Sionix
Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31,
2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the “Report”), I, David R. Wells, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify to my knowledge and in my capacity as an officer of the Company,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
  and,




2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
      as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the
    Report.






Date:
January 13, 2010




/s/
      David R. WellsDavid
      R. WellsPresident,
      Chief Financial Officer, and Principal Financial and Accounting
      Officer







A
certification furnished pursuant to this Item will not be deemed “filed” for
purposes of section 18 of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78r), or otherwise subject
to the liability of that section. Such certification will not be deemed to be
incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the
Exchange Act, except to the extent that the registrant specifically incorporates
it by reference.
§ 1500.3 Applicability. ( a ) Uniform administrative requirements and cost principles (subparts A through E of 2 CFR part 200 as supplemented by this part) apply to foreign public entities or foreign organizations, except where EPA determines that the application of this part would be inconsistent with the international obligations of the United States or the statutes or regulations of a foreign government.
( b ) Requirements for subrecipient monitoring and management at 2 CFR 200.331 through 200.333 do not apply to loan, loan guarantees, interest subsidies and principal forgiveness, purchases of insurance or local government debt or similar transactions with borrowers by recipients of Clean Water State Revolving Fund (CWSRF) capitalization grants and Drinking Water State Revolving Fund (DWSRF) capitalization grants. Requirements in 2 CFR part 25, Universal Identifier and System for Award Management, 2 CFR part 170, Reporting subaward and executive compensation and internal controls described at 2 CFR 200.303 continue to apply to CWSRF and DWSRF grant recipients and borrowers.
[85 FR 61573, Sept. 30, 2020, as amended at 87 FR 30397, May 19, 2022]
§ 708.32 Appealing an initial agency decision. ( a ) By the 15th day after receiving an initial agency decision from the Administrative Judge, any party may file a notice of appeal with the OHA Director requesting review of the initial agency decision.
( b ) A party who appeals an initial agency decision (the appellant) must serve a copy of the notice of appeal on all other parties.
( c ) A party who receives an initial agency decision has not exhausted its administrative remedies until an appeal has been filed with the OHA Director and a decision granting or denying the appeal has been issued.
|   | (a) | the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2011 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (b) | the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of such period and the results of operations of the Company for such period. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | /s/ Steven N. Bronson        |
|--------|------------------------------|
|   | Steven N. Bronson, President |

----
Exhibit 10.2 - Joint Venture Agreement with DNR.



Exhibit 10.2


	
COBRA

OIL & GAS COMPANY
	 	 
		 
	 	 
	 	 
	
17790 E. Purdue Place
	
t: 303 618-2855

	
Aurora, Colorado
	
f: 303 766-0637

	
U. S. A.   80013
	 





 

 

 

 

	
DNR OIL & GAS COMPANY
	
May 15, 2006

	
12741 E. Caley, Unit #142

	
Centennial, Colorado

	
80111








Re:   JOINT VENTURE AGREEMENT


DNR OIL & GAS COMPANY (DNR) does hereby agrees to purchase a 25%  (twenty five percent) working interest in the Mike Prospect in Adams County, Colorado, Section 23,24-1S-62W.  


	DNR will pay 25% of the up-front Prospect Fee & Land Costs upon execution of this agreement.

	
Land
	
$20,000.00
	 
	
Prospect Fee
	
3,000.00
	 
	
Total Costs
	
$23,000.000
	 
	
DNR Costs     
	
$ 5,750.00
	
(25% of $23,000.00)






	DNR will pay 25% of any lease rentals required.


	DNR will pay 25% of the costs of drilling and completion upon receipt of an AFE.





	
DNR OIL & GAS COMPANY
	 
	
By:  Charles B. Davis 
	
Signature: CHARLES B. DAVIS

	
Title:  President
H. Res. 470

In the House of Representatives, U.S., 

September 29, 2005.

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule 

XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the 

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of 

the bill (H.R. 3824) to amend and reauthorize the Endangered Species Act of 1973 to provide greater results conserving and recovering listed species, and for other purposes. 

The first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. All 

points of order against consideration of the bill are waived. 

General debate shall be confined to the bill and shall not exceed ninety minutes equally divided and controlled by the 

chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on 

Resources. After general debate the bill shall be considered 

for amendment under the five-minute rule. In lieu of the 

amendment recommended by the Committee on Resources 

now printed in the bill, it shall be in order to consider as an 

original bill an amendment in the nature of a substitute consisting of the text of the Resources Committee Print dated 
2

•HRES 470 EH 

September 26, 2005. That amendment in the nature of a 

substitute shall be considered as read. All points of order 

against that committee amendment in the nature of a substitute are waived. Notwithstanding clause 11 of rule XVIII, 

no amendment to that amendment in the nature of a substitute shall be in order except those printed in the report of 

the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution. Each 

such amendment may be offered only in the order printed in 

the report, may be offered only by a Member designated in 

the report, shall be considered as read, shall be debatable for 

the time specified in the report equally divided and controlled 

by the proponent and an opponent, shall not be subject to 

amendment, and shall not be subject to a demand for division 

of the question in the House or in the Committee of the 

Whole. All points of order against such amendments are 

waived. At the conclusion of consideration of the bill for 

amendment the Committee shall rise and report the bill to 

the House with such amendments as may have been adopted. 

Any Member may demand a separate vote in the House on 

any amendment adopted in the Committee of the Whole to 

the bill or to the amendment in the nature of a substitute 

made in order as original text. The previous question shall be 

considered as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to 
3

•HRES 470 EH 

final passage without intervening motion except one motion 

to recommit with or without instructions. 

Attest:

Clerk.
#### In the Matter of Lakeside Country Club, Inc., Petitioner, v. New York State Liquor Authority et al., Respondents.

Determination unanimously modified on the facts and in the exercise of discretion in accordance with the memorandum herein, and as so modified confirmed, without costs. Memorandum: Petitioner, a membership club, made a written contract with a man and his wife to manage its restaurant and bar, by the terms of which after payment of certain expenses they were to receive the proceeds of the restaurant and 95% of the proceeds of the bar. Respondent Authority canceled petitioner’s license, after a hearing, for violation of section 111 of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Law on the ground that petitioner permitted one who is not mentioned in its license to avail himself of it. Petitioner admitted entering into the agreement in 1969 after losing money in 1967 and 1968 in this operation and after being advised by legal counsel that such an arrangement was proper. The agreement was for the 1969 season only and had terminated before the hearing on January 22, 1970. While there was a violation of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Law which was not intended, no advantage or harm resulted, and it has ceased to exist. In view of the demonstrated good faith of petitioner cancellation of its license under these circumstances was so disproportionate to the offense as to constitute an abuse of discretion on the part of the respondent State Liquor Authority *(Matter of 230 Green Rest. Corp.*v. *State Liq. Auth.,*32 A D 2d 898, affd. 27 N Y 2d 606). The penalty should be reduced to a suspension of the license for a period of 10 days. (Review of determination canceling liquor license, transferred by order of Monroe Special Term.) Present — Goldman, P. J., Marsh, Witmer, Moule and Henry, JJ.
Exhibit 32



                        President's Written Certification
                             Of Financial Statements
                       Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Statute 1350



     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Statute 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity
as president of 4net Software, Inc. (the "Company") that

     (a)  the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-QSB for the period
          ended June 30, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section
          13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

     (b)  the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end
          of such period and the results of operations of the Company for such
          period.



Dated: August 13, 2004



                                            /s/ Steven N. Bronson
                                            ----------------------------------
                                            Steven N. Bronson, President
§ 182.200 What must I do to comply with this part? There are two general requirements if you are a recipient other than an individual. ( a ) First, you must make a good faith effort, on a continuing basis, to maintain a drug-free workplace. You must agree to do so as a condition for receiving any award covered by this part. The specific measures that you must take in this regard are described in more detail in subsequent sections of this subpart. Briefly, those measures are to— ( 1 ) Publish a drug-free workplace statement and establish a drug-free awareness program for your employees (see §§ 182.205 through 182.220); and
( 2 ) Take actions concerning employees who are convicted of violating drug statutes in the workplace (see § 182.225).
( b ) Second, you must identify all known workplaces under your Federal awards (see § 182.230).