alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### HEIFERMAN v. GREENHUT CLOAK CO.

(No. 5927.)

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

June 12, 1914.)

Appeal from Appellate Term, First Department. Action by Frank Heiferman against the Greenhut Cloak Company. From a determination of the Appellate Term (83 Misc. Rep. 435, 145 N. Y. Supp. 142), reversing an, order of the City Court setting aside a verdict and granting a new trial (143 N. Y. Supp. 411), and from an order of the City Court entered upon such determination, defendant appeals. Determination of Appellate Term and order of City Court thereon entered reversed, and the original order affirmed. See, also, 146 N. Y. Supp. 1094.

David L. Podell, of New York City, for appellant.

George H. Francoeur, of New York City, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

We think the order of the trial judge setting aside the verdict and granting a new trial was under the circumstances proper, and that such order should not have been reversed. The determination of the Appellate Term and the order of the City Court thereupon entered are therefore reversed, with costs in this court and in the Appellate Term, and the original order of the City Court affirmed.
223 So.2d 412

#### Mrs. Yvonne Marie VIVES, wife of Jacques Lanauze FORTIER v. Jacques Lanauze FORTIER.

No. 49886.

June 13, 1969.

In re: Mrs. Yvonne Marie Vives Fortier applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans, 221 So.2d 653.

Application refused. There is no error of law in the judgment complained of under the assignment of errors.
`[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 857 Reported in House (RH)]







                                                 House Calendar No. 191
109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 857

                          [Report No. 109-496]

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
 bill (H.R. 4939) making emergency supplemental appropriations for the 
     fiscal year ending September 30, 2006, and for other purposes.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 9, 2006

     Mr. Cole, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION


 
Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
 bill (H.R. 4939) making emergency supplemental appropriations for the 
     fiscal year ending September 30, 2006, and for other purposes.

    Resolved,  That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order to consider the conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 
4939) making emergency supplemental appropriations for the fiscal year 
ending September 30, 2006, and for other purposes. All points of order 
against the conference report and against its consideration are waived. 
The conference report shall be considered as read.
                                                 House Calendar No. 191

109th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                              H. RES. 857

                          [Report No. 109-496]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
 bill (H.R. 4939) making emergency supplemental appropriations for the 
     fiscal year ending September 30, 2006, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                              June 9, 2006

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed`
H. Res. 918

In the House of Representatives, U.S., 

July 18, 2006.

Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it 

shall be in order without intervention of any point of order 

to consider in the House the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 88) 

proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United 

States relating to marriage. The joint resolution shall be considered as read. The previous question shall be considered as 

ordered on the joint resolution to final passage without intervening motion except: (1) one hour and 30 minutes of debate 

equally divided and controlled by the Majority Leader and the 

Minority Leader or their designees; and (2) one motion to recommit. 

SEC. 2. During consideration of H.J. Res. 88 pursuant 

to this resolution, notwithstanding the operation of the pre-
2

•HRES 918 EH 

vious question, the Chair may postpone further consideration 

of the joint resolution to a time designated by the Speaker. 

Attest:

Clerk.
(logo)LNR

          Partners, LLC

 

 

ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

 

OF

 

LNR PARTNERS, LLC

 

 

The undersigned, Job Warshaw,being the President of LNR Partners, LLC (the “Special Servicer”), as specialservicer under the applicable Pooling and Servicing Agreement for thetransactions listed on Schedule I hereto, hereby certifies, subject toany limitations listed on Schedule I hereto, as of the date hereof, onbehalf of the Special Servicer, solely in his capacity as an authorized officerof the Special Servicer and not in his individual capacity, as follows:

 

1.            A review ofthe activities performed by the Special Servicer during the period commencingon January 1, 2018 and ending on December 31, 2018 (or any other shorter periodset forth on Schedule I hereto) (the “'Reporting Period”), and of theSpecial Servicer’s performance under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement hasbeen made under my supervision; and

 

2.            To the bestof my knowledge, based on such review and using the applicable servicingcriteria under Item 1122 of Regulation AB, the Special Servicer has fulfilledall of its obligations under the applicable Pooling and Servicing Agreement inall material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

LNR PARTNERS, LLC,

a Florida limited liabilitycompany

 

 

By: /s/ Job Warshaw

Job Warshaw

President

 

 

Dated: February 19, 2019

 

 

1601 Washington Avenue • Suite 700 • Miami Beach,Florida 33139-3164

Telephone: (305) 695-5600 • Fax: (305) 695-5601

 

 

 

**Schedule I**

 

 

MSBAM 2013-C9

Morgan Stanley Bank of AmericaMerrill Lynch Trust 2013-C9, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates,Series 2013-C9

 

Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc.

1585 Broadway

New York NY 10036

Stephen Holmes

 

Trimont Real Estate Advisors,LLC

3500 Lenox Road, Suite G1

Attention: Trust AdvisorServices

Atlanta GA 30326

Group Mailbox

 

Trimont Real Estate Advisors,LLC

3500 Lenox Road, Suite G1

Attn: Trust Advisor Services

Atlanta GA 30326

J. Gregory Winchester

 

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

9062 Old Annapolis Road

ATTN: MSBAM 2013-C9

Columbia MD 21045 1951

Corporate Trust (CMBS) BondGroup
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      The undersigned officer of Wellman, Inc. (the "Company") hereby certifies
that the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31,
2005 (the "Report"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company. This certification is
provided solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed to be a
part of the Report or "filed" for any purpose whatsoever.

Date: May 9, 2005

                                              /s/ Keith R. Phillips
                                              ---------------------
                                              Chief Financial Officer
exv10w55



 





Exhibit 10.55




LANDEC CORPORATION

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION SCHEDULE



Non-employee Directors (the “Directors”) will receive the annual retainers, meeting fees, meeting
expenses and equity-based awards described below as compensation for serving as a member of the
Board of Directors.



Annual Retainers 



Board Retainer - Each Director will receive an annual board retainer of $20,000 to be paid in
quarterly installments of $5,000.



Compensation Committee Chairman Retainer – Each Director who serves as the Chairman of the
Compensation Committee will receive an annual retainer of $5,000.



Audit Committee Retainer – Each Director who serves on the Audit Committee will receive an annual
retainer of $10,000, with the Chairman receiving an annual retainer of $15,000.



Lead Independent Director Retainer – Each Director who serves as the Lead Independent Director of
the non-employee executive sessions of the Board shall receive an annual retainer of $10,000.



Meeting Fees



Each Director will receive $1,000 for each regular meeting, adjourned regular meeting or special
meeting of the Board attended in person by the Director ($500 if attended by phone), $500 for each
regular meeting, adjourned regular meeting or special meeting of a Committee attended in person by
the Director as a member of the Committee, and $1,000 for each shareholder meeting attended by the
Director.



Meeting Expenses 



Reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred by a Director to attend Board meetings, Committee
meetings or shareholder meetings in his or her capacity as a Director will be reimbursed.



Equity Compensation Awards 



On June 15, 2006, Directors were granted options to purchase 5,000 shares of the Company’s Common
Stock and 1,667 restricted stock units pursuant to the terms of the Company’s 2005 Stock Incentive
Plan. The stock options are fully vested and exercisable on the date of grant and have an
exercise price equal to the fair market value of the Common Stock on the date of grant. The
restricted stock units will vest on the first anniversary of the grant date.
#### § 700.5 Supersession.

Effective December 26, 2014, this part supersedes the following regulations under Title 22 of the Code of Federal Regulations: 22 CFR part 226, “Administration of Assistance Awards To U.S. Non-Governmental Organizations.”
Exhibit
32.2

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Patient Safety Technologies, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, William B. Horne, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company.

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

|                |                         | 
|--------------- | ----------------------- | 
|August 15, 2005 | /s/ William B. Horne    | 
|                |                         | 
|                | William B. Horne       
|                | Chief Financial Officer

---
# L_2010172EN.01000501.xml

| 7.7.2010 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 172/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.7.2010

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 172/5

---

Corrigendum to Council Directive 90/426/EEC of 26 June 1990 on animal health conditions governing the movement and import from third countries of equidae

(
  Official Journal of the European Communities L 224 of 18 August 1990
  )

On page 42, sixth recital:

for:

‘Whereas the conditions for the movement on national territory of equidae bearing an identification document should also be regulated;’,

read:

‘Whereas the conditions for the movements on national territory of registered equidae bearing an identification document should also be regulated;’;

On page 43, first paragraph of Article 3:

for:

‘Member States shall authorize the movement of equidae registered in their territory ...’,

read:

‘Member States shall authorise the movement of registered equidae in their territory ...’;

On page 44, fourth indent of Article 4(5)(a):

for:

| ‘— | six months in the case of vesicular stomatitis,’, |
| --- | --- |

‘—

six months in the case of vesicular stomatitis,’,

read:

| ‘— | six months from the last recorded case, in the case of vesicular stomatitis,’. |
| --- | --- |

‘—

six months from the last recorded case, in the case of vesicular stomatitis,’.

---
##### 



Exhibit 32.2

WESTCORP

CERTIFICATION OF CFO

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Westcorp (the Company) on Form
10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, to the best of his
knowledge and belief and pursuant to 18 U.S.C., Chapter 63, Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the SarbanesOxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and                          
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
of the Company.

The foregoing Certification is furnished solely for purposes of complying
with the provisions of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and is not
intended to be used for any other purpose.

|                                                                                                                                                                |  | 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|WESTCORP                                                                                                                                                        |  | 
|                                                                                                                                                                |  | 
|/S/ LEE A. WHATCOTT

Lee A. Whatcott
Executive Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer and
Chief Operating Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |  | 

Date: August 14, 2003
§ 1401.250 Grant. *Grant* means an award of financial assistance that, consistent with 31 U.S.C. 6304, is used to enter into a relationship whereby— ( a ) The principal purpose of which is to transfer a thing of value to the recipient to carry out a public purpose of support or stimulation authorized by a law of the United States, rather than to acquire property or services for the Federal Government's direct benefit or use; and
( b ) In which substantial involvement is not expected between the Federal agency and the recipient when carrying out the activity contemplated by the award.
§ 3254.20 Does this part apply to me? This part and, through this part, pertinent portions of the OMB guidance in subparts A through I of 2 CFR part 180 (see table at 2 CFR 180.100(b)) apply to you if you are a— ( a ) Participant or principal in a “covered transaction” (see subpart B of 2 CFR part 180 and the definition of “nonprocurement transaction” at 2 CFR 180.970.
( b ) Respondent in a NEA suspension or debarment action.
( c ) NEA debarment or suspension official;
( d ) NEA grants officer, agreements officer, or other official authorized to enter into any type of nonprocurement transaction that is a covered transaction;
H. Res. 897

In the House of Representatives, U.S., 

June 29, 2006.

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule 

XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the 

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of 

the bill (H.R. 4761) to provide for exploration, development, 

and production activities for mineral resources on the outer 

Continental Shelf, and for other purposes. The first reading 

of the bill shall be dispensed with. All points of order against 

consideration of the bill are waived. General debate shall be 

confined to the bill and shall not exceed one hour equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority 

member of the Committee on Resources. After general debate 

the bill shall be considered for amendment under the fiveminute rule. It shall be in order to consider as an original 

bill for the purpose of amendment under the five-minute rule 

the amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by 

the Committee on Resources now printed in the bill. The 

committee amendment in the nature of a substitute shall be 
2

•HRES 897 EH 

considered as read. All points of order against the committee 

amendment in the nature of a substitute are waived. Notwithstanding clause 11 of rule XVIII, no amendment to the committee amendment in the nature of a substitute shall be in 

order except those printed in the report of the Committee on 

Rules accompanying this resolution. Each such amendment 

may be offered only in the order printed in the report, may 

be offered only by a Member designated in the report, shall 

be considered as read, shall be debatable for the time specified in the report equally divided and controlled by the proponent and an opponent, shall not be subject to amendment, 

and shall not be subject to a demand for division of the question in the House or in the Committee of the Whole. All 

points of order against such amendments are waived. At the 

conclusion of consideration of the bill for amendment the 

Committee shall rise and report the bill to the House with 

such amendments as may have been adopted. Any Member 

may demand a separate vote in the House on any amendment 

adopted in the Committee of the Whole to the bill or to the 

committee amendment in the nature of a substitute. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and 

amendments thereto to final passage without intervening motion except one motion to recommit with or without instructions. 
3

•HRES 897 EH 

SEC. 2. House Resolutions 162, 163, 181, 182, 393, 

395, 400, 401, 468, and 620 are laid upon the table.

Attest: 

Clerk.
Editorial Note on Part 9
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 9 appear at 82 FR 52825, Nov. 15, 2017.

§ 9.202 Procedure in the event of a demand for production or disclosure. ( a ) Prior to or simultaneous with a demand upon an employee of the NRC for the production of material or the disclosure of information described in § 9.200, the party seeking production or disclosure shall serve the General Counsel of the NRC with an affidavit or statement as described in paragraphs (b) (1) and (2) of this section. Except for employees in the Office of Inspector General, whenever a demand is made upon an employee of the NRC for the production of material or the disclosure of information described in § 9.200, that employee shall immediately notify the General Counsel. If the demand is made upon a regional NRC employee, that employee shall immediately notify the Regional Counsel who, in turn, shall immediately request instructions from the General Counsel. If the demand is made upon an employee in the Office of Inspector General, that employee shall immediately notify the Inspector General. The Inspector General shall immediately provide a copy of the demand to the General Counsel, and as deemed necessary, consult with the General Counsel.
( b ) ( 1 ) If oral testimony is sought by the demand, a summary of the testimony desired must be furnished to the General Counsel by a detailed affidavit or, if that is not feasible, a detailed statement by the party seeking the testimony or the party's attorney. This requirement may be waived by the General Counsel in appropriate circumstances.
( 2 ) The General Counsel may request a plan from the party seeking discovery of all demands then reasonably foreseeable, including but not limited to, names of all NRC personnel from whom discovery is or will be sought, areas of inquiry, length of time away from duty involved, and identification of documents to be used in each deposition, where appropriate.
( c ) The Inspector General or the General Counsel will notify the employee and such other persons, as circumstances may warrant, of the decision on the matter.
[50 FR 37645, Sept. 17, 1985, as amended at 55 FR 33648, Aug. 17, 1990]
Text of email to me from Professor P. D. Jones of CRU. 

 

Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 12:12:22 +0000 

From: Phil Jones <p.jones@uea.ac.uk> 

To: "wshughes@iinet.net.au" <wshughes@iinet.net.au> 

Subject: Re: WMO non respondo 

 

 

Warwick, 

Hans Teunisson will reply. He'll tell you which other people should 

reply. 

Hans is "Hans Teunissen" <HTeunissen@wmo.int> . 

 

I should warn you that some data we have we are not supposed top pass on 

to others. We can pass on the gridded data - which we do. Even if WMO 

agrees, I will still not pass on the data. We have 25 or so years invested 

in the work. Why should I make the data available to you, when your aim 

is to try and find something wrong with it. There is IPR to consider. 

 

You can get similar data from GHCN at NCDC. Australia isn't restricted 

there. Several European countries are. Basically because, for example, France 

doesn't want the French picking up data on France from Asheville. Meteo France 

wants to supply data to the French on France. Same story in most of the others. 

 

Cheers 

Phil 

Uncorrected Evidence 35 Page 1 of 1

http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200910/cmselect/cmsctech/memo/climatedat... 7/27/2010