alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

ATLANTIS BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION

---------------------------------------------------

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14 AND 15D-14 OF

THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

I Christopher Dubeau, Chief Executive Officer, certify that:

(1) I have reviewed this quarterly report on form 10-QSB of Atlantis Business
Development Corporation (the "registrant");

(2) Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to sate a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

(3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

(4) The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) Presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

(5) The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee
of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function):

a) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls: and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

(6) The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: June 7, 2005

> /s/
>               Christopher Dubeau
>               Christopher Dubeau
>               CEO

---
The Law...

A United States person who has a financial interest in or 

signature or other authority over financial account(s) located 

outside the United States is required to file a Report of 

Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts (FBAR) if the aggregate 

value of these accounts exceeds $10,000 at any time during 

the calendar year.

How to comply with the law...

• Answer FBAR-related questions on federal tax and 

information returns. For example: Check the block on 

Form 1040 Schedule B, Part III.

• File a complete and accurate FBAR using FinCEN’s 

electronic filing system for Bank Secrecy Act forms 

available at www.fincen.gov. Contact FinCEN’s 

Regulatory Support Section (800-949-2732 or 703-905-

3975) with questions on how to file the FBAR.

• File the FBAR by April 15 of the year following the 

calendar year being reported.

For assistance...

Visit www.IRS.gov or www.fincen.gov to view FBAR 

information, instructions, filing extensions, and other 

resources. For general questions about FBAR filing 

requirements or filing methods, call the IRS FBAR hotline 

(866-270-0733 or 313-234-6146). For technical questions 

about the e-filing system, contact FinCEN (866-346-9478 or 

BSAEFilingHelp@fincen.gov).

Do You Have a

Foreign Financial Account?

Publication 4261 (Rev. 7-2021) Catalog Number 37658C

Department of the Treasury Internal Revenue Service

www.irs.gov

You may be required to report the account to 

the Department of the Treasury.
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-23-00135-CV

3HM TRUCKING, LLC, MICHAEL JEROME WRIGHT,

PRESTIGE GUNITE, INC., JESUS MARIA ROSALES, III,

TRI-NATIONAL, INC., AND RMR DRIVER SERVICES, INC.

v.

JOANN CARR ELIZONDO, ET AL.

On Appeal from the

92nd District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. C-4439-22-A

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED. Costs of the appeal are adjudged 

against appellants.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

March 21, 2024
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial data extracted from the Registrant's
unaudited consolidated financial statements as of and for the quarter ended
August 1, 1998, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements and the notes thereto.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JAN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   AUG-01-1998
<CASH>                                               1,223
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                          530
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                         12,203
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    14,745
<PP&E>                                              26,779
<DEPRECIATION>                                      22,148
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      19,397
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               15,435
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                3,834
<PREFERRED>                                          2,072
<COMMON>                                            16,164
<OTHER-SE>                                        (18,245)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        19,397
<SALES>                                             15,963
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    15,963
<CGS>                                               11,520
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       16,189
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     344
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      (570)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  (570)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                         (570)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       (1.29)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0
        

</TABLE>
#### FRANK v. BELNORD REALTY CO.

(No. 5974.)

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

June 19, 1914.)

Appeal from Trial Term, New York County. Action by Jennie Frank against the Belnord Realty Company. From a judgment for plaintiff, and an order denying a new trial, defendant appeals. Judgment and order reversed, and complaint dismissed.

E. Clyde Sherwood of New York City, for appellant.

Levin L. Brown, of New York City, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

We think there was no evidence to justify the submission of the question of the defendant's negligence to the jury. The judgment and order appealed from are therefore reversed, with costs, and the complaint dismissed, with costs.
Editorial Note on Part 180
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 180 appear at 79 FR 75879, Dec. 19, 2014.

§ 180.25 What must a Federal agency address in its implementation of the guidance? Each Federal agency implementing regulation: ( a ) Must establish policies and procedures for that agency's nonprocurement debarment and suspension programs and activities that are consistent with the guidance. When adopted by a Federal agency, the provisions of the guidance have regulatory effect for that agency's programs and activities.
( b ) Must address some matters for which these guidelines give each Federal agency some discretion. Specifically, the regulation must— ( 1 ) Identify either the Federal agency head or the title of the designated official who is authorized to grant exceptions under § 180.135 to let an excluded person participate in a covered transaction.
( 2 ) State whether the agency includes as covered transactions an additional tier of contracts awarded under covered nonprocurement transactions, as permitted under § 180.220(c).
( 3 ) Identify the method(s) an agency official may use, when entering into a covered transaction with a primary tier participant, to communicate to the participant the requirements described in § 180.435. Examples of methods are an award term that requires compliance as a condition of the award; an assurance of compliance obtained at time of application; or a certification.
( 4 ) State whether the Federal agency specifies a particular method that participants must use to communicate compliance requirements to lower-tier participants, as described in § 180.330(a). If there is a specified method, the regulation needs to require agency officials, when entering into covered transactions with primary tier participants, to communicate that requirement.
( c ) May also, at the agency's option: ( 1 ) Identify any specific types of transactions that the Federal agency includes as “nonprocurement transactions” in addition to the examples provided in § 180.970.
( 2 ) Identify any types of nonprocurement transactions that the Federal agency exempts from coverage under these guidelines, as authorized under § 180.215(g)(2).
( 3 ) Identify specific examples of types of individuals who would be “principals” under the Federal agency's nonprocurement programs and transactions, in addition to the types of individuals described at § 180.995.
( 4 ) Specify the Federal agency's procedures, if any, by which a respondent may appeal a suspension or debarment decision.
( 5 ) Identify by title the officials designated by the Federal agency head as debarring officials under § 180.930 or suspending officials under § 180.1010.
( 6 ) Include a subpart covering disqualifications, as authorized in § 180.45.
( 7 ) Include any provisions authorized by OMB.
[70 FR 51865, Aug. 31, 2005, as amended at 71 FR 66432, Nov. 15, 2006; 79 FR 75879, Dec. 19, 2014]
IV 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 819 

Requesting the President and directing the Attorney General to submit to 

the House of Representatives all documents in the possession of the 

President and the Attorney General relating to requests made by the 

National Security Agency and other Federal agencies to telephone service 

providers requesting access to telephone communications records of persons in the United States and communications originating and terminating within the United States without a warrant. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 17, 2006 

Mr. WEXLER submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Requesting the President and directing the Attorney General 

to submit to the House of Representatives all documents 

in the possession of the President and the Attorney General relating to requests made by the National Security 

Agency and other Federal agencies to telephone service 

providers requesting access to telephone communications 

records of persons in the United States and communications originating and terminating within the United 

States without a warrant. 

1 Resolved, That the President is requested and the At2 torney General is directed to submit to the House of RepVerDate Aug 31 2005 04:10 May 19, 2006 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\HR819.IH HR819

ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 819 IH

1 resentatives, not later than 14 days after the date of the 

2 adoption of this resolution, all documents in the possession 

3 of the President and the Attorney General, including all 

4 legal opinions, relating to requests made without a war5 rant by the National Security Agency or other Federal de6 partments and agencies to telephone service providers, in7 cluding wireless telephone service providers, for access to 

8 telephone communications records of persons in the 

9 United States (other than as authorized under title I of 

10 the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 (50 

11 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.) or chapter 119 or 121 of title 18, 

12 United States Code), subject to necessary redactions or 

13 requirements for handling classified documents. 

Æ 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
#### Irving Jontow, Plaintiff, v. David L. Jontow et al., Individually and as Copartners Doing Business under the Name of Standard Coat & Suit Co., Defendants. Simon Presant, Appellant; Laurence Rosenberg et al., Respondents.

Order entered September 17, 1969, herein appealed from, unanimously modified on the law and the facts to the extent of awarding to Laurence M. Rosenberg and/or the firm of Rosenberg & Rosenberg the sum of $6,333.34 as their compensation for their services rendered to the plaintiff, and awarding to Simon Presant, Esq., the sum of $6,333.33 for services rendered to the plaintiff. As so modified, the order appealed from is otherwise affirmed, without costs and without disbursements to either party. The plaintiff retained the appellant Simon Presant, Esq., to represent him in a negligence action. After investigating the facts, appellant advised that an action be brought. Since he was engaged in general practice of law he recommended that the respondent firm be retained as trial counsel. The plaintiff agreed and the appellant engaged the respondent firm as trial counsel. Appellant and respondent thereupon executed a written retainer agreement which provided that the Rosenberg firm was to receive one half of appellant’s fee. After the ease was on the Trial Calendar, the plaintiff discharged the appellant and the question of his lien was left for the determination of the Trial Court. The trial resulted in a jury verdict of $118,000 which was not appealed. The trial court properly held that the sum of $38,000 was to be the total attorney’s fees. From this amount he directed, on a *quantum mermt*basis, that $25,333.33 be awarded to the incoming attorney and $12,666.67 to the substituted attorney. There is no dispute as to these amounts. The court then directed that of the $12,666.67, two thirds or $8,444.45 be awarded to the respondent Rosenberg firm, and one third or $4,222.22 to the appellant Simon Presant, Esq. In view of the fact that there was a written agreement between the appellant and the respondent tp divide their fee equally, and the fact that the appellant did perform services for the plaintiff, it was error for the trial court to set the fees in question on *745a *quantum meruit*basis. Where there is an express contract for compensation an action will not lie for *quantum meruit {Foster*v. *White S Sons,*244 App. Div. 368, 371). And this principle is applicable to the awarding of attorney’s fees *{Murray*v. *Waring Mat Mfg. Go.,*142 App. Div. 514, 517). Nor is an agreement between attorneys to divide a fee prohibited by the Canons of Ethics where both contributed toward the earning of the fee *{Sterling*v. *Miller,*2 A D 2d 900, affd. 3 N Y 2d 778; 7 N. Y. Jur., Champerty and Maintenance, § 12; 3 N. Y. Jur., Attorney and Client, § 89). The order appealed from is modified accordingly. Concur—Stevens, P. J., Eager, Nunez, Steuer and Tilzer, JJ.
IV 

House Calendar No. 215 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 924 

[Report No. 109–578] 

Providing for consideration of the bill (S. 2754) to derive human pluripotent 

stem cell lines using techniques that do not knowingly harm embryos. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 18, 2006 

Mr. GINGREY, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; 

which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the bill (S. 2754) to derive 

human pluripotent stem cell lines using techniques that 

do not knowingly harm embryos. 

1 Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution 

2 it shall be in order without intervention of any point of 

3 order to consider in the House the bill (S. 2754) to derive 

4 human pluripotent stem cell lines using techniques that 

5 do not knowingly harm embryos. The bill shall be consid6 ered as read. The previous question shall be considered 

7 as ordered on the bill to final passage without intervening 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
2 

HRES 924 RH 

1 motion except: (1) one hour of debate equally divided and 

2 controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member 

3 of the Committee on Energy and Commerce; and (2) one 

4 motion to recommit. 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS

jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
House Calendar No. 215 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 924 

[Report No. 109

–578] 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the bill (S. 2754) to 

techniques that do not knowingly harm embryos. derive human pluripotent stem cell lines using 

JULY 18, 2006 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
IV 

House Calendar No. 206 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 891 

[Report No. 109–530] 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4973) to restore the financial 

solvency of the national flood insurance program, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 26, 2006 

Mr. SESSIONS, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4973) to restore 

the financial solvency of the national flood insurance 

program, and for other purposes. 

1 Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this 

2 resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of 

3 rule XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee 

4 of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consider5 ation of the bill (H.R. 4973) to restore the financial sol6 vency of the national flood insurance program, and for 

7 other purposes. The first reading of the bill shall be disVerDate Aug 31 2005 03:53 Jun 27, 2006 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\HR891.RH HR891

CCOLEMAN on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

HRES 891 RH 

1 pensed with. All points of order against consideration of 

2 the bill are waived. General debate shall be confined to 

3 the bill and shall not exceed one hour equally divided and 

4 controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member 

5 of the Committee on Financial Services. After general de6 bate the bill shall be considered for amendment under the 

7 five-minute rule. The bill shall be considered as read. Not8 withstanding clause 11 of rule XVIII, no amendment to 

9 the bill shall be in order except those printed in the Com10 mittee on Rules accompanying this resolution. Each such 

11 amendment may be offered only in the order printed in 

12 the report, may be offered only by a Member designated 

13 in the report, shall be considered as read, shall be debat14 able for the time specified in the report equally divided 

15 and controlled by the proponent and an opponent, shall 

16 not be subject to amendment, and shall not be subject to 

17 a demand for division of the question in the House or in 

18 the Committee of the Whole. All points of order against 

19 such amendments are waived. At the conclusion of consid20 eration of the bill for amendment the Committee shall rise 

21 and report the bill to the House with such amendments 

22 as may have been adopted. The previous question shall 

23 be considered as ordered on the bill and amendments 

24 thereto to final passage without intervening motion except 

25 one motion to recommit with or without instructions. 


CCOLEMAN on PROD1PC71 with BILLS

CCOLEMAN on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
House Calendar No. 206 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 891 

[Report No. 109

–530] 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4973) 

flood insurance program, and for other purposes. to restore the financial solvency of the national 

JUNE 26, 2006 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 


CCOLEMAN on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the annual report of SBH ASSOCIATES, INC. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2015 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael R. Beecham, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify that:  1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date: October 7, 2016 By: /s/MICHAEL R. BEECHAM Michael R. Beecham Chief Executive Officer
| **Scientific Investigations Map          2836** |
|-------------------------------------------------|

| Surficial geologic map of the Ellendale quadrangle, Shelby County, Tennessee |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

By Roy Van Arsdale**Version 1.0***Published 2004*The text of this report is presented here in Portable Document Format.      The latest version of Adobe Acrobat Reader® or similar software is      required to view it. If you wish to download the latest version of Acrobat      Reader® free of charge, click here. SIM 2836 PDF        file (2.18 MB)For printing and viewing
Text Only PDF file (25 KB)
(This version of the report is accessible as defined in Section 508.)Readme TXT file (2        KB) SIM 2836 MET file (14 KB)Metadata file
 
2836.zip (261 KB)ZIPPED archive of ArcInfo and ArcView files2836.tar.gz (263 KB)TARRED and GZIPPED archive of ArcInfo and ArcView filesbases.zip (1.97 MB)ZIPPED archive of base maps imagesbases.tar.gz (1.95 MB)TARRED and GZIPPED archive of base maps imagesAccessibilityFOIAPrivacyPolicies and Notices
U.S. Department of the Interior | U.S. Geological Survey      URL: https://pubsdata.usgs.gov/pubs/sim/2004/2836/Questions or Assistance: USGS Web ContactPage Last Modified: Thr Dec  1 17:03 EDT 2016
§ 904.12 Payments to contractors. ( a ) Funds advanced to the Secretary of the Interior for the Uprating Program and costs reasonably incurred by the Contractor in advancing such funds, as approved by Western, shall be returned to the Contractor advancing the funds during the Contract period through credits on that Contractor's power bills. Appropriate credits will be developed and applied pursuant to terms and conditions agreed to by contract or agreement.
( b ) All other obligations of the United States to return funds to a Contractor shall be repaid to such Contractor through credits on power bills, with or without interest, pursuant to terms and conditions agreed to by contract or agreement.