alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I,
Jennifer M. Davis, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect
of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2013-2 (the Exchange Act periodic reports);

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed
by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports,
the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and

5. All of the reports on
assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance
with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been
disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the
following unaffiliated parties: U.S. Bank National Association.



/s/ Jennifer M. DavisName:

Jennifer M. DavisTitle:

Deputy Chief Financial OfficerDate:

March 29, 2016
§ 1128.610 General requirement for cost sharing or matching. ( a ) *Requirement.* ( 1 ) FMS Article VI of the general terms and conditions must tell a recipient that: ( i ) It may find the amount or percentage of cost sharing or matching required under its award in the award cover pages.
( ii ) The cost sharing or matching amount or percentage identified in the award includes all required (but not voluntary uncommitted) contributions to the project or program by the recipient and its subrecipients, including any that involve third-party contributions or donations to the recipient and subrecipients.
( iii ) It must obtain the DoD Component's prior approval for any change in the required amount or percentage of cost share or match.
( 2 ) At a DoD Component's option, FMS Article VI also may require a recipient to obtain the DoD Component's prior approval if it wishes to substitute alternative cost sharing or matching contributions in lieu of specific contributions included in the approved budget (*e.g.,* to use a third-party in-kind contribution not included in the approved budget).
( b ) *Award terms and conditions.* To implement paragraph (a) of this section, a DoD Component's general terms and conditions must include the wording appendix F to this part provides as Section A of FMS Article VI. A DoD Component may insert wording in lieu of the reserved paragraph A.2.b if it elects to require recipients to obtain prior approval before substituting alternative cost sharing or matching contributions, as described in paragraph (a)(2) of this section.
#### § 860.8 Applicability of other laws.

Nothing in this part shall be construed to affect the applicability of the provisions of State or other Federal laws.
§ 960.4-2-8-2 Site ownership and control. ( a ) *Qualifying condition.* The site shall be located on land for which the DOE can obtain, in accordance with the requirements of 10 CFR part 60, ownership, surface and subsurface rights, and control of access that are required in order that potential surface and subsurface activities as the site will not be likely to lead to radionuclide releases greater than those allowable under the requirements specified in § 960.4-1.
( b ) *Favorable condition.* Present ownership and control of land and all surface and subsurface rights by the DOE.
( c ) *Potentially adverse condition.* Projected land-ownership conflicts that cannot be successfully resolved through voluntary purchase-sell agreements, nondisputed agency-to-agency transfers of title, or Federal condemnation proceedings.
§ 2424.1145 May HUD impute the conduct of one person to another in a limited denial of participation? For purposes of determining a limited denial of participation, HUD may impute conduct as follows: ( a ) *Conduct imputed from an individual to an organization.* HUD may impute the fraudulent, criminal, or other improper conduct of any officer, director, shareholder, partner, employee, or other individual associated with an organization, to that organization when the improper conduct occurred in connection with the individual's performance of duties for or on behalf of that organization, or with the organization's knowledge, approval, or acquiescence. The organization's acceptance of the benefits derived from the conduct is evidence of knowledge, approval, or acquiescence.
( b ) *Conduct imputed from an organization to an individual or between individuals.* HUD may impute the fraudulent, criminal, or other improper conduct of any organization to an individual, or from one individual to another individual, if the individual to whom the improper conduct is imputed participated in, had knowledge of, or had reason to know of the improper conduct.
( c ) *Conduct imputed from one organization to another organization.* HUD may impute the fraudulent, criminal, or other improper conduct of one organization to another organization when the improper conduct occurred in connection with a partnership, joint venture, joint application, association, or similar arrangement, or when the organization to whom the improper conduct is imputed has the power to direct, manage, control, or influence the activities of the organization responsible for the improper conduct. Acceptance of the benefits derived from the conduct is evidence of knowledge, approval, or acquiescence.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. L. Judson Morhouse, Appellant.

Judgment affirmed for the reasons set forth in the decision of Mr. Justice Gellinoff. Concur — McNally, Steuer and Tilzer, JJ.; Stevens, P. J., and Eager, J., dissent and vote to reverse and order a new trial on the ground that there was a wrongful invasion of the councils of the defense.
Exhibit 32



                        President's Written Certification
                             Of Financial Statements
                       Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Statute 1350



     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Statute 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 907 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity
as president of 4net Software, Inc. (the "Company") that

     (a)  the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-QSB for the period
          ended June 30, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section
          13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

     (b)  the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end
          of such period and the results of operations of the Company for such
          period.



Dated: August 14, 2007



                                            /s/ Steven N. Bronson
                                            ----------------------------------
                                            Steven N. Bronson, President
§ 860.5 Violations and penalties. ( a ) Whoever willfully violates either § 860.3 or § 860.4 shall, upon conviction, be guilty of an infraction punishable by a fine of not more than $5,000.
( b ) Whoever willfully violates either § 860.3 or § 860.4 with respect to any facility, installation or real property enclosed by a fence, wall, floor, roof, or other structural barrier shall upon conviction, be guilty of a Class A misdemeanor punishable by a fine not to exceed $100,000 or imprisonment for not more than one year, or both.
#### § 490.206 Violations.

Violations of this subpart are subject to investigation and enforcement under subpart G of this part.
**NS Servicing II, LLC**

**399 Park Avenue, 18th Floor**

**New York, New York 10022**

** **

**ANNUAL OFFICERS’CERTIFICATE**

 

Reference is hereby made toMorgan Stanley Bank of America Merrill Lynch Trust 2013-C8, Commercial MortgagePass-Through Certificates, Series 2013-C8 (the "Trust"), issuedpursuant to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as of February1, 2013 (the "Agreement"), by and among Banc of America Merrill LynchCommercial Mortgage Inc., as depositor (the "Depositor"), Wells FargoBank, N.A. as servicer (the "Servicer"), NS Servicing II, LLC, asspecial servicer (the "Special Servicer"), U.S. Bank NationalAssociation, as trustee (the "Trustee"), Wells Fargo Bank, NationalAssociation, as certificate administrator, certificate registrar andauthenticating agent (the "Certificate Administrator") and, in itscapacity as Custodian (the “Custodian”), and Situs Holdings, LLC,as trust advisor (the “Trust Advisor”). Capitalized terms usedherein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 13.9 ofthis Agreement, we, Matt Brandwein and Daniel D. Raffe, each as authorizedofficers of NorthStar Asset Management Group, LLC, sole Member of NS ServicingII, LLC, do hereby certify in our capacities as officers of NorthStar AssetManagement Group, LLC and without personal liability:

 

1.   A review of theactivities of the Special Servicer during the year ended December 31, 2016 (the“Reporting Period”) and of its performance under the Agreementduring such period has been made under our supervision; and 

 

2.   To the best ofour knowledge, based on such review, the Special Servicer has fulfilled all ofits obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, theundersigned have executed this Certificate as of the 10th day of March 2017. 

 

 

/s/ Matt Brandwein

Matt Brandwein

NorthStar Asset ManagementGroup, LLC, sole Member of Special Servicer

 

 

/s/ Daniel D. Raffe

Daniel D. Raffe

NorthStar Asset ManagementGroup, LLC, sole Member of Special Servicer
#### MITCHELL, Respondent, v. PLANCK, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

July 1, 1914.)

Action by Robert M. Mitchell against Jay A. Planck.

No opinion. Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs.
#### § 1134.2 Applicability of this part.

The types of awards and entities to which this part and other parts in this subchapter apply are described in the subchapter overview at 2 CFR 1126.2.
#### Margar Rest. Corp., Petitioner, v. State Liquor Authority et al., Respondents.

Motion by petitioner to enjoin respondents from interfering with the operation of petitioner’s business and from prohibiting the sale of alcoholic beverages by petitioner on its premises, pending determination of this proceeding under article 78 of the CPLR. Motion dismissed as academic, the proceeding is decided herewith (see *Margar Rest. Corp.*v. *State Liq. Auth.,*34 A D 2d 828). Hopkins, Acting P. J., Munder, Martuscello, Brennan and Benjamin, JJ., concur.
§ 200.453 Materials and supplies costs, including costs of computing devices. ( a ) Costs incurred for materials, supplies, and fabricated parts necessary to carry out a Federal award are allowable.
( b ) Purchased materials and supplies must be charged at their actual prices, net of applicable credits. Withdrawals from general stores or stockrooms must be charged at their actual net cost under any recognized method of pricing inventory withdrawals, consistently applied. Incoming transportation charges are a proper part of materials and supplies costs.
( c ) Materials and supplies used for the performance of a Federal award may be charged as direct costs. In the specific case of computing devices, charging as direct costs is allowable for devices that are essential and allocable, but not solely dedicated, to the performance of a Federal award.
( d ) Where federally-donated or furnished materials are used in performing the Federal award, such materials will be used without charge.
[78 FR 78608, Dec. 26, 2013, as amended at 79 FR 75887, Dec. 19, 2014]
DISASTER VICTIM CUSTOMER SERVICE

SURVEY RESULTS

Data from 1994 - 1995

For the past two years, FEMA has conducted a

written survey of one FEMA customer group,

the individual applicants for disaster assistance.

Below are the average survey results from

disasters declared for individual assistance

between July 1994 and August 1995.

HUMAN RELATIONS

FEMA’s

highest ratings

were in the

area of human

relations. The

average ratings

for

respectfulness

of the application taker and of the inspector

were above 90%. FEMA’s willingness to

take time to listen to the applicant and

interest in the applicant’s situation were also

in the 90% range.

SERVICE

FEMA generally received ratings well above

average for its services.

For the application

process, FEMA’s average

ratings were over 90% in

the area of helpfulness

and speed of service. The

customers rated FEMA between 80% and

90% in the area of clarity, accuracy, and

usefulness of information they received

during the application process and for ease

of applying for assistance.

In the area of inspection,

FEMA received an average

rating of 91% for accuracy of

the estimate of the

inspection date. Inspector

helpfulness and service both

received average ratings between 80% and

90%.

In the area of

Helpline

assistance, the

customers gave

FEMA average

ratings between

70% and 80%

for speed of

service,

accuracy of information, and the ability to

answer their questions.

The customers gave FEMA an average

rating of 84% for

speed in

receiving a check

.

FAIRNESS

The fairness of the inspector's judgment

received a rating of 74% and FEMA’s

fairness to the community received a rating

of 77%.

MITIGATION

Forty-five percent of

customers responding

had been informed of

how to protect against

future disasters.

INFORMATION

Forty-two percent of

the customers knew of

FEMA before the

disaster.
#### § 1400.1013 The administrative record.

The administrative record for DOI suspension and debarment actions consists of the initiating action referral memorandum and its attached documents; the action notice; contested action scheduling correspondence; written information, arguments and supporting documents submitted by a respondent in opposition to the action notice; written information, arguments and supporting documents submitted by the OIG ARD in response to information provided by a respondent; the electronic recording of the PMIO, where a PMIO is held as part of the proceeding; where fact-finding is conducted, the transcribed record of the fact-finding proceedings, and findings of fact; and the final written determination by the Suspending and Debarring Official on the action; or, alternatively, the administrative agreement endorsed by the respondent and the Suspending and Debarring Official that resolves an action.

[81 FR 65857, Sept. 26, 2016]
##### 



Exhibit 31.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Kevin K. Moriarty, Director, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Del
Taco Income Properties IV, certify that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Del Taco Income
Properties IV;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and
have:  a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as
of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected,
or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and




---



##### 



5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board
of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting
which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrants
internal controls over financial reporting. Date:
    
    May 14, 2004
    
    /s/ Kevin K. MoriartyKevin K. MoriartyDirector, Chairman andChief Executive Officer
 -2-
226 So.2d 522

#### Melvin H. MELANCON v. ZOAR MISSIONARY BAPTIST CHURCH et al.

No. 49936.

Oct. 1, 1969.

In re: Melvin H. Melancon applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court *759of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of East Baton Rouge. 222 So.2d 308.

Application denied. On the facts as found by the Court of Appeal the result is' correct.
§ 60.17 Contents of site characterization plan. The site characterization plan shall contain— ( a ) A general plan for site characterization activities to be conducted at the area to be characterized, which general plan shall include: ( 1 ) A description of such area, including information on quality assurance programs that have been applied to the collection, recording, and retention of information used in preparing such description.
( 2 ) A description of such site characterization activities, including the following— ( i ) The extent of planned excavations;
( ii ) Plans for any onsite testing with radioactive material, including radioactive tracers, or nonradioactive material;
( iii ) Plans for any investigation activities that may affect the capability of such area to isolate high-level radioactive waste;
( iv ) Plans to control any adverse impacts from such site characterization activities that are important to safety or that are important to waste isolation; and
( v ) Plans to apply quality assurance to data collection, recording, and retention.
( 3 ) Plans for the decontamination and decommissioning of such area, and for the mitigation of any significant adverse environmental impacts caused by site characterization activities, if such area is determined unsuitable for application for a construction authorization for a geologic repository operations area;
( 4 ) Criteria, developed pursuant to section 112(a) of the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982, to be used to determine the suitability of such area for the location of a geologic repository; and
( 5 ) Any other information which the Commission, by rule or order, requires.
( b ) A description of the possible waste form or waste package for the high-level radioactive waste to be emplaced in such geologic repository, a description (to the extent practicable) of the relationship between such waste form or waste package and the host rock at such area, and a description of the activities being conducted by DOE with respect to such possible waste form or waste package or their relationship; and
( c ) A conceptual design for the geologic repository operations area that takes into account likely site-specific requirements.
[51 FR 27163, July 30, 1986]
# EUR-Lex - 31983R2287 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31983R2287

**Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2287/83 of 29 July 1983 laying down provisions for the implementation of Article 127 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 918/83 setting up a Community system of reliefs from customs duty **

*
Official Journal L 220 , 11/08/1983 P. 0012 - 0012 Spanish special edition: Chapter 02 Volume 10 P. 0047 Portuguese special edition Chapter 02 Volume 10 P. 0047 *

*****

COMMISSION REGULATION (EEC) No 2287/83

of 29 July 1983

laying down provisions for the implementation of Article 127 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 918/83 setting up a Community system of reliefs from customs duty

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN

COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 918/83 of 28 March 1983 setting up a Community system of reliefs from customs duty (1), and in particular Article 143 thereof,

Whereas Article 127 of Regulation (EEC) No 918/83, hereinafter referred to as the basic Regulation, provides that the provisions of Chapter I of that Regulation shall apply both to goods declared for free circulation coming directly from third countries and to goods declared for free circulation after having being subject to another customs procedure; whereas, however, the cases in which duty-free admission may not be granted for goods declared for free circulation after having being subject to another customs procedure is to be determined in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 143 (2) and (3) of the basic Regulation;

Whereas Article 27 of the basic Regulation provides for relief from import duty for consignments dispatched to their consignee by letter or parcel post and consisting of goods of a total value not exceeding 10 ECU;

Whereas commercial undertakings should not be enabled to benefit from these provisions by instigating ad hoc activities or by artificially transferring existing activities, thus giving rise to distortions of competition within the common market; whereas, in order to avoid such distortions, the abovementioned consignments should not be eligible for relief from import duties if, prior to their entry for free circulation, they were placed under another customs procedure; whereas, therefore, the relief should apply only where the consignments in question are dispatched directly from a third country to a natural or legal person in the Community;

Whereas the measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee on Duty-Free Arrangements,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The duty-free admission referred to in Article 27 of Regulation (EEC) No 918/83 shall apply only to consignments dispatched by letter or parcel-post directly from a third country to a natural or legal person in the Community.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 1 July 1984.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 29 July 1983.

For the Commission

Karl-Heinz NARJES

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ No L 105, 23. 4. 1983, p. 1.