alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 2500.100 Adoption of 2 CFR Part 200.

Under the Authority cited above, NSF has formally adopted 2 CFR part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (“the Uniform Guidance”). The Foundation's implementation document, the NSF Proposal & Award Policies & Procedures Guide, may be found at: *http://www.nsf.gov/publications/pub_summ.jsp?ods_key=papp*.

NSF's implementation includes the following deviation from the Uniform Guidance:

Award Cash Management System—NSF is continuing collection of award financial information through the implementation of the Award Cash Management Service (ACM$) and the Program Income Worksheet. ACM$ replaced the NSF Federal Financial Report (FFR) and the NSF FastLane Cash Request process with a single web based user interface. ACM$ is used to collect award level detail financial information at the time of each payment request submitted by the awardee institution. The Program Income Worksheet is used to collect program income financial information from awardee institutions on an annual basis. ACM$ and the Program Income Worksheet utilize approved government-wide data elements from the FFR for the collection of financial information as provided for in the Uniform Guidance paragraph 505(c) and prescribed in 2 CFR 200.327. The requirement for Federal agencies to use the FFR data elements for cash management and financial reporting was publically announced in Federal Register on August 13, 2008.
228 So.2d 482

#### Rufus R. BUDD v. NICHOLS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY et al.

No. 50147.

Dec. 11, 1969.

In re: Rufus R. Budd applying for certiorari or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of East Baton Rouge. 225 So.2d 636.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal, there is no error of law in its judgment.
#### Deane E. HORNE, Appellant, v. Togo D. WEST, Jr., Acting Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Appellee.

No. 96-708.

United States Court of Veterans Appeals.

Feb. 5, 1998.

Before NEBEKER, Chief Judge, and KRAMER and IVERS, Judges.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

On December 16,1997, the Court dissolved a stay in this case based upon the issuance of a decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in *Epps v. Gober,*126 F.3d 1464 (Fed.Cir.1997). That decision affirmed this Court’s decision in *Epps v. Brown,*9 Vet.App. 341 (1996). On January 13,1998, the appellant moved to reinstate the stay pending a decision by the U.S. Supreme Court on a petition for certiorari filed in the *Epps*case. As this Court noted in *Tobler v. Derwinski,*2 Vet.App. 8, 11 (1991), any legal interpretations, conclusions, or rulings contained in a precedential decision are the law of the jurisdiction from the date of the decision unless or until overturned by a court of competent jurisdiction. Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is

ORDERED that the appellant’s motion to reinstate the stay of proceedings is denied. The appellant’s brief is due within 30 days after the date of this order.
Editorial Note on Part 9
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 9 appear at 82 FR 52825, Nov. 15, 2017.

§ 9.101 Definitions. As used in this subpart: ( a ) *Commission* means the collegial body of five Commissioners or a quorum thereof as provided by section 201 of the Energy Reorganization Act of 1974, or any subdivision of that collegial body authorized to act on its behalf, and shall not mean any body not composed of members of that collegial body.
( b ) *Commissioner* means an individual who is a member of the Commission.
( c ) *Meeting* means the deliberations of at least a quorum of Commissioners where such deliberations determine or result in the joint conduct or disposition of official Commission business, that is, where discussions are sufficiently focused on discrete proposals or issues as to cause or to be likely to cause the individual participating members to form reasonably firm positions regarding matters pending or likely to arise before the agency. Deliberations required or permitted by §§ 9.105, 9.106, or 9.108(c) do not constitute “meetings” within this definition.
( d ) *Closed meeting* means a meeting of the Commission closed to public observation as provided by § 9.104.
( e ) *Open meeting* means a meeting of the Commission open to public observation pursuant to this subpart.
( f ) *Secretary* means the Secretary to the Commission.
( g ) *General Counsel* means the General Counsel of the commission as provided by section 25(b) of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 and section 201(f) of the Energy Reorganization Act of 1974, and, until such time as the offices of that officer are in the same location as those of the Commission, any member of his or her office specially designated in writing by him or her pursuant to this subsection to carry out his or her responsibilities under this subpart.
[42 FR 12877, Mar. 7, 1977, as amended at 50 FR 20891, May 21, 1985]
#### § 200.432 Conferences.

A conference is defined as a meeting, retreat, seminar, symposium, workshop or event whose primary purpose is the dissemination of technical information beyond the non-Federal entity and is necessary and reasonable for successful performance under the Federal award. Allowable conference costs paid by the non-Federal entity as a sponsor or host of the conference may include rental of facilities, speakers' fees, costs of meals and refreshments, local transportation, and other items incidental to such conferences unless further restricted by the terms and conditions of the Federal award. As needed, the costs of identifying, but not providing, locally available dependent-care resources are allowable. Conference hosts/sponsors must exercise discretion and judgment in ensuring that conference costs are appropriate, necessary and managed in a manner that minimizes costs to the Federal award. The Federal awarding agency may authorize exceptions where appropriate for programs including Indian tribes, children, and the elderly. See also §§ 200.438, 200.456, and 200.475.

[85 FR 49567, Aug. 13, 2020]
file:///J|/INITENG/P13%20cases/p130392.eng.txt[6/4/2013 7:59:17 AM] INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT PMN: 13-0392 Focus Ready Draft 5/2/2013 ENGINEER: Choudhary \ AH
SUBMITTER: DIC International (USA) LLC

MSDS: Yes Label: No Gen Eqpt: Gloves, face protection, tightly sealed goggles Respirator: In case of brief exposure or low pollution use respiratory filter device. In case of intensive or longer exposure use self-contained respiratory protective deivi Health Effects: Flammable; reacts with water forming carbon dioxide. No irritating effect on the skin/eye. TLV/PEL: None established.file:///J|/INITENG/P13%20cases/p130392.eng.txt[6/4/2013 7:59:17 AM] Consumer Use: No SAT (concerns) (04/26/2013): Related Cases and Related Cases and Misc SAT Info: Migration to groundwater: Negligible PBT rating: P3B1T1 PMN: P1B1T1. Hyd Pdt: P3B1T1. Health: 1-2 Dermal, Inhalation Eco: 1 No releases to Water OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 2-3B NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS: Generated by the 06/07/2005 version of ChemSTEER.

POLLUTION PREVENTION CONSIDERATIONS: None.file:///J|/INITENG/P13%20cases/p130392.eng.txt[6/4/2013 7:59:17 AM] EXPOSURE-BASED REVIEW: No INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT PMN: 13-0392

Number of Sites/ Location: 3 unknown site(s) Days/yr: 250

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY IRER Note: The daily releases listed for any source below may coincide with daily releases from the other sources to the same medium

Air Output 2: 10.0E-1 kg/site-day over 250 days/yr from 3 sites

RELEASE TOTAL 7.5E+2 kg/yr - all sitesfile:///J|/INITENG/P13%20cases/p130392.eng.txt[6/4/2013 7:59:17 AM]
##### 



Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION OF CFO PURSUANT TO SECURITIES ACT
RULES 13A-14 AND 15D-14 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Del Taco Income Properties IV;2.
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and
15d-14) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this report is being prepared;b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls over financial
reporting.
 Date:  November 14, 2005
    /s/ Robert J. TerranoRobert J. TerranoExecutive Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer
#### § 824.3 Definitions.

As used in this part:

*Act* means the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2011 *et seq.*).

*Administrator* means the Administrator of the National Nuclear Security Administration.

*Classified information* means Restricted Data and Formerly Restricted Data protected against unauthorized disclosure pursuant to the Act and National Security Information that has been determined pursuant to Executive Order 12958, as amended March 25, 2003, or any predecessor or successor executive order to require protection against unauthorized disclosure and that is marked to indicate its classified status when in documentary form.

*DOE* means the United States Department of Energy, including the National Nuclear Security Administration.

*Director* means the DOE Official, or his or her designee, to whom the Secretary has assigned responsibility for enforcement of this part.

*Person* means any person as defined in section 11.s. of the Act, 42 U.S.C. 2014, and includes any affiliate or parent corporation thereof, who enters into a contract or agreement with DOE, or is a party to a contract or subcontract under a contract or agreement with DOE.

*Secretary* means the Secretary of Energy.
H. Res. 612

In the House of Representatives, U.S., 

December 16, 2005.

Whereas the Iraqi election of December 15, 2005, the first 

to take place under the newly ratified Iraqi Constitution, 

represented a crucial success in the establishment of a 

democratic, constitutional order in Iraq; and 

Whereas Iraqis, who by the millions defied terrorist threats 

to vote, were protected by Iraqi security forces with the 

help of United States and Coalition forces: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That—

(1) the House of Representatives is committed to 

achieving victory in Iraq; 

(2) the Iraqi election of December 15, 2005, was a 

crucial victory for the Iraqi people and Iraq’s new democracy, and a defeat for the terrorists who seek to destroy that democracy; 

(3) the House of Representatives encourages all 

Americans to express solidarity with the Iraqi people as 

they take another step toward their goal of a free, open, 

and democratic society; 
2

•HRES 612 EH 

(4) the successful Iraqi election of December 15, 

2005, required the presence of United States Armed 

Forces, United States–trained Iraqi forces, and Coalition 

forces; 

(5) the continued presence of United States Armed 

Forces in Iraq will be required only until Iraqi forces 

can stand up so our forces can stand down, and no 

longer than is required for that purpose; 

(6) setting an artificial timetable for the withdrawal 

of United States Armed Forces from Iraq, or immediately terminating their deployment in Iraq and redeploying them elsewhere in the region, is fundamentally 

inconsistent with achieving victory in Iraq; 

(7) the House of Representatives recognizes and 

honors the tremendous sacrifices made by the members 

of the United States Armed Forces and their families, 

along with the members of Iraqi and Coalition forces; 

and 

(8) the House of Representatives has unshakable 

confidence that, with the support of the American people 

and the Congress, United States Armed Forces, along 
3

•HRES 612 EH 

with Iraqi and Coalition forces, shall achieve victory in 

Iraq. 

Attest:

Clerk.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          50,309
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  371,763
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  4,942,098
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,364,170
<PP&E>                                         165,762
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,282
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,215,465
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,929,591
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       108,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     177,874
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,215,465
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               387,161
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  631,257
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              23,275
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (267,371)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,259
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (269,630)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

This gives notice under the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463) of October 6, 1972, that the CDC/HRSA Advisory Committee on HIV and STD Prevention and Treatment, Department of Health and Human Services, has been renewed for a 2-year period through November 25, 2012.

*Contact Person for More Information:*                     Kevin Fenton, M.D., PhD, Designated Federal Officer, CDC/HRSA Advisory Committee on HIV and STD Prevention and Treatment, Department of Health and Human Services, CDC, 1600 Clifton Road, NE., Mailstop E07, Atlanta, Georgia 30333, telephone (404)639-8000 or fax (404)639-8600.                

                    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been delegated the authority to sign                     **Federal Register**                     notices pertaining to announcements of meetings and other committee management activities, for both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.                

Dated: December 13, 2010.

Elaine L. Baker,

Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

[FR Doc. 2010-31785 Filed 12-16-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
2007-0842.

#### State ex rel. Pesci v. Lucci.

Lake App. No. 2006-L-112, 2007-Ohio-1547. Reported at 115 Ohio St.3d 218, 2007-Ohio-4795, 874 N.E.2d 774. On motion for reconsideration and motion to strike memorandum opposing reconsideration. Motions denied.
U N I T E D S

T A T E S O F A

M E R I C A D E P A R T M E N T O F T R A N S P O R T A T

I O N UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY WASHINGTON, D.C.

Issued by the Department of Transportation

on the 26 th day of June, 2014

Essential Air Service at

MERCED, CALIFORNIA VISALIA, CALIFORNIA

Under 49 U.S. C. § 47131 et seq. DOCKET DOT-OST-1998-3521
DOCKET DOT-OST-2004-19916



### NOTICE EXTENDING THE DE ADLINE FOR PROPOSALS

By Order 2014-5-9, issued on May 21, 2014, the Depa rtment requested proposals for Essential Air Service (EAS) at Merced and Visalia, Ca lifornia, with proposals due no later than June 27, 2014. On June 26, 2014, Mokulele Airlines requested an extension to that deadline, until July 11, 2014. In that request, Mr. Ron Hansen, Chief Operating Officer of Mokulele Airlines, explained that due to the Department’s issuance of Order 2014-6-6, on June 24, 2014, which terminated the EAS eligibility of Merced, the air carrier needs additional time to evaluate Visalia’s market, and would like to meet with th e city of Merced to discuss its future air transportation options.

We will grant the extension request. Proposals for the above communities are now due July 11, 2014. Air carriers should be very clear as to whether a specific community’s proposal is on a stand-alone basis, or whether it is part of a larger, inseparable package with the other community.

KEVIN D. SCHLEMMER Chief, EAS and Domestic Analysis Division

An electronic version of this document is available at http://www.regulations.gov
#### GUY, Respondent, v. M. REID & CO. et al., Appellants.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

June 26, 1914.)

Action by Arthur Guy, as administrator, etc., against M. Reid & Co. and another.

F. V. Johnson, of New York City, for appellants.

S. Bacon, of New York City, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Order filed.

INGRAHAM., P. J., and SCOTT, J., dissent as to M. Reid & Co.
IV 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 747 

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to require that all 

members of the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence and all 

members of the Subcommittee on Defense of the Committee on Appropriations have security clearances. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 30, 2006 

Mr. BUYER submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Rules 

RESOLUTION 

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to 

require that all members of the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence and all members of the Subcommittee on Defense of the Committee on Appropriations have security clearances. 

1 Resolved, That (a) clause 11(a) of rule X of the Rules 

2 of the House of Representatives is amended by adding at 

3 the end the following new subparagraph: 

4 ‘‘(5) No Member, Delegate, or Resident Commis5 sioner may serve as a member of the select committee 

6 until such Member, Delegate, or Resident Commissioner 

7 receives a security clearance at the highest level required 


rfake on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 747 IH 

1 of any staff of the select committee. Any such security 

2 clearance shall be renewed at least every 4 years.’’. 

3 (b) Clause 11 of rule X of the Rules of the House 

4 of Representatives is amended by adding at the end the 

5 following new paragraph: 

6 ‘‘(f) No Member, Delegate, or Resident Commissioner 

7 may serve as a member of the Subcommittee on Defense 

8 of the Committee on Appropriations until such Member, 

9 Delegate, or Resident Commissioner receives a security 

10 clearance at the highest level required of any staff of the 

11 Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence. Any such se12 curity clearance shall be renewed at least every 4 years.’’. 

13 (c) The amendments made by this resolution shall 

14 take effect immediately before noon January 3, 2007. 

Æ 


rfake on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
#### § 766.1 Purpose.

The provisions of this part establish procedures for the Special Assessment of domestic utilities for the Uranium Enrichment Decontamination and Decommissioning Fund pursuant to sections 1801, 1802 and 1803 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (42 U.S.C. § 2011 *et seq.*).