alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 3485.711 When does a suspension affect title IV, HEA transactions? ( a ) A suspension under § 3485.611(a) takes effect immediately if the Secretary takes an emergency action under 34 CFR part 668, subpart G, or 34 CFR part 682, subpart D or G, at the same time the Secretary issues the suspension.
( b ) ( 1 ) Except as provided under paragraph (a) of this section, a suspension under § 3485.611(a) takes effect 20 days after those procedures are complete.
( 2 ) If the respondent appeals the suspension to the Secretary before the expiration of the 20 days under paragraph (b)(1) of this section, the suspension takes effect when the respondent receives the Secretary's decision.
(Authority: E.O. 12549 (3 CFR 1986 Comp., p. 189); E.O. 12689 (3 CFR 1989 Comp., p. 235); sec. 2455, Pub. L. 103-355, 108 Stat. 3327 (31 U.S.C. 6101 note); 20 U.S.C. 1082, 1094, 1221e-3, and 3474)
Editorial Note on Part 180
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 180 appear at 79 FR 75879, Dec. 19, 2014.

§ 180.880 What factors may influence the debarring official during reconsideration? The debarring official may reduce or terminate your debarment based on— ( a ) Newly discovered material evidence;
( b ) A reversal of the conviction or civil judgment upon which your debarment was based;
( c ) A bona fide change in ownership or management;
( d ) Elimination of other causes for which the debarment was imposed; or
( e ) Other reasons the debarring official finds appropriate.
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 04-1229

___________ Jordan Blair, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the Western * District of Arkansas. Bob Wills, also known as W. B. * Wills, also known as Bobby Ray * Wills; Betty Sue Wills; Sam * [UNPUBLISHED] Gerhardt; Deborah Gerhardt; Bo * Gerhardt; Julie Gerhardt; Drew * Parrish; Robert O'Briant; Robert * Kennedy; Mountain Park Boarding * Academy; Palm Lane Baptist Church, * Inc., * * Appellees, * ----------------------------------------------- * State of Arkansas, Crawford County; * Ron Blair; Jan Blair; Chris Blair; * Timmy Blair, * * Movants Below - * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: November 12, 2004 Filed: November 16, 2004

___________ Before MURPHY, FAGG, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.1 The Honorable Robert T. Dawson, United States District Judge for the Western District of Arkansas.
-2- ___________ PER CURIAM. Jordan Blair appeals the district court’s 1 order quashing his subpoena for his juvenile records. Appellees Bob and Betty Sue Wills; Sam, Deborah, Bo, and Julie Gerhardt; Drew Parrish; Robert O’Briant; Robert Kennedy; and Palm Lane Baptist Church have moved to supplement the record on appeal with a complaint, a motion, and multiple court orders. We grant this motion.
We also dismiss this appeal as moot, because the case for which Blair sought a subpoena is no longer proceeding in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri, but is instead pending in multiple appeals in this court. See McCook Metals LLC v. Alcoa, Inc. , 249 F.3d 330, 334 (4th Cir. 2001) (ancillary court’s power to issue subpoenas is dependent on jurisdiction of court where underlying action is pending); Sullivan v. Dickson , 283 F.2d 725, 727 (9th Cir. 1960) (motion to inspect documents under Fed. R. Civ. P. 34 or 45(b) cannot be granted in absence of pending proceeding), cert. denied , 366 U.S. 951 (1961); cf. 9A Charles Alan Wright & Arthur R. Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure § 2456 at 29 (2d ed. 1995) (“subpoena may issue only in aid of a pending action”). Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See8th Cir. R. 47A(a).

______________________________
§ 1532.1600 What definitions apply specifically to actions under this subpart? In addition to definitions under subpart A through I of 2 CFR part 180 that apply to this part as a whole, the following two definitions apply specifically to CAA and CWA disqualifications under this subpart: ( a ) Person means an individual, corporation, partnership, association, state, municipality, commission, or political subdivision of a state, or any interstate body.
( b ) Violating facility means any building, plant, installation, structure, mine, vessel, floating craft, location or site of operations that gives rise to a CAA or CWA conviction, and is a location at which or from which a Federal contract, subcontract, loan, assistance award or other covered transactions may be performed. If a site of operations giving rise to a CAA or CWA conviction contains or includes more than one building, plant, installation, structure, mine, vessel, floating craft, or other operational element, the entire location or site of operation is regarded as the violating facility unless otherwise limited by the EPA.
EX-31Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications.

 

 

I,Anthony Sfarra, certify that:

 

1.I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D requiredto be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of theWFRBS Commercial Mortgage Trust 2013-C12 (the "Exchange Act periodicreports");

 

2.Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, donot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3.Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other informationrequired to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this reportis included in the Exchange Act periodic reports; 

 

4.Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in thisreport under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in theExchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligationsunder the servicing agreements in all material respects; and

 

5.All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria forasset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment ofcompliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to beincluded in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB andExchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to thisreport, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances ofnoncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report onForm 10-K.

 

Ingiving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on informationprovided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:

 

NationalCooperative Bank, N.A. (as successor to NCB, FSB), as NCB Master Servicer,Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as Special Servicer, National Cooperative Bank,N.A., as Co-op Special Servicer, U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee,Pentalpha Surveillance LLC, as Trust Advisor, CoreLogic Commercial Real EstateServices, Inc., as Servicing Function Participant, National Tax Search, LLC, asServicing Function Participant, and Prudential Asset Resources, Inc., asPrimary Servicer.

 

 

 

Dated:October 31, 2019

 

 

/s/Anthony Sfarra

 

 

President

(senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
#### § 3186.505 Who in the IMLS determines that a recipient who is an individual violated the requirements of this part?

The IMLS Chief Financial Officer is the official authorized to make the determination under 2 CFR 182.505.
Editorial Note on Part 72
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 72 appear at 80 FR 74981, Dec. 1, 2015, and at 81 FR 86910, Dec. 2, 2016.

§ 72.13 Applicability. ( a ) This section identifies those sections, under this part, that apply to the activities associated with a specific license, a general license, or a certificate of compliance.
( b ) The following sections apply to activities associated with a specific license: §§ 72.1; 72.2(a) through (e); 72.3 through 72.13(b); 72.16 through 72.34; 72.40 through 72.62; 72.70 through 72.86; 72.90 through 72.108; 72.120 through 72.130; 72.140 through 72.176; 72.180 through 72.186; 72.190 through 72.194; and 72.200 through 72.206.
( c ) The following sections apply to activities associated with a general license: 72.1; 72.2(a)(1), (b), (c), and (e); 72.3 through 72.6(c)(1); 72.7 through 72.13(a) and (c); 72.30(b), (c), (d), (e) and (f); 72.32(c) and (d); 72.44(b) and (f); 72.48; 72.50(a); 72.52(a), (b), (d), and (e); 72.60; 72.62; 72.72 through 72.80(f); 72.82 through 72.86; 72.104; 72.106; 72.122; 72.124; 72.126; 72.140 through 72.176; 72.190; 72.194; 72.210 through 72.220, and 72.240(a).
( d ) The following sections apply to activities associated with a certificate of compliance: §§ 72.1; 72.2(e) and (f); 72.3; 72.4; 72.5; 72.7; 72.9 through 72.13(a) and (d); 72.48; 72.84(a); 72.86; 72.124; 72.140 through 72.176; 72.214; and 72.230 through 72.248.
[65 FR 50616, Aug. 21, 2000, as amended at 76 FR 35573, June 17, 2011]
#### Douglas Coral, Appellant, v State of New York et al., Defendants, and Hope for Youth, Inc., et al., Respondents.

[814 NYS2d 527]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Loughlin, J.), dated April 11, 2005, as granted that branch of the motion of the defendants Hope for Youth, Inc., and David Smith which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against the defendant Hope for Youth, Inc.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

To prove a prima facie case of negligence, a plaintiff must demonstrate the existence of a duty, a breach of that duty, and that the breach of such duty was a proximate cause of his or her injuries *(see Pulka v Edelman,*40 NY2d 781, 782 [1976]; *Edwards v Mercy Home for Children & Adults,*303 AD2d 543, 544 [2003]). In the absence of a duty, there is no breach and no liability *(see Pulka v Edelman, supra; Fernandez v Elemam,*25 AD3d 752 [2006]). Here, in support of the motion for summary judgment, the defendant Hope for Youth, Inc., made a prima facie showing of its entitlement to judgment as a matter of law *(see generally Alvarez v Prospect Hosp.,*68 NY2d 320 [1986]). In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact. Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against the defendant Hope for Youth, Inc. Goldstein, J.P., Mastro, Rivera and Lunn, JJ., concur.
§ 824.8 Hearing. ( a ) Any person who receives a final notice of violation under § 824.7 may request a hearing concerning the allegations contained in the notice. The person must mail or deliver any written request for a hearing to the Director within 30 calendar days of receipt of the final notice of violation.
( b ) Upon receipt from a person of a written request for a hearing, the Director shall: ( 1 ) Appoint a Hearing Counsel; and
( 2 ) Select an administrative law judge appointed under section 3105 of Title 5, U.S.C., to serve as Hearing Officer.
### 1"17 l,\J t. 

## 23 A!!: Ol UNITED STA1'ES OF AMERICA

## ~Ec 

# . DEPARTMENTOFTRANSPORTATIO!fl 

# EIVED WASHINGTON, D.C.
. . 

### ··--··-·· 

## AUG . 

## f 5 2012 

# HEARING DOCKET

. ) Michael P. Huerta, Acling Administrator, ) f-ederal Aviation Administration, ) Complainant, 

### v. MOUNTt\IN AVIATION, INC. ) ) ) Case No. 2011NM030039 Judge: Not yet assigned ) ) ) Respondent. ) Hearing Date; Not yet assigned Hearing Location: Not yet assigned**---·--·---~** 

# _______) 

# ---**c!<.Dt~-** 

# 6**~')** S REQUEST FOR HF:ARINC In

# ~ccorda11ce with 14 C ..F.R. § 13.16 and Subpart G ofPart 13 ofthe Code ofFcd<:lral Regulations, Respondent Mountain Aviation, 

### Inc. by and through undersigned counsel, hereby files this Request for Hearing as outlined inlhe Pinal Notice: of Proposed Civil Penalty dated August 6, 2012, in connection 

### with Complainant's Case No. 2011NM030039, proposing a penally of $21,450.

Pated: August 14, 2012

GOO/LOO 

### ill 

## swo + Respectfully Submitted, JACKSON & WADE, L.L.C
.**..,?---~** 

# ,.,**,~ 2~-··-.;,2-----**  

# ..... ·-. / .....-:



# __ ...

# ___ ' Kent S. Jackson 21628 Midland Dr. Shawnee, 

### KS 66218 Phone (913) 338-1700 Fax (913) 338-1755 ATTORNEY FOR

### Rl~SPONDENT

### I hereby certify that I 

### have this day ser>cd the foregoing document 

### on the following 

### parties' Cll:RTlFICA

### TI~ OJ;" SERVICE

.counsel or designated representatives at the address indicated 

### by Federal Express to 

### the following**addrcs~cs:** Original ,and one CC?JOC 

### federal Aviation 

### Administration Attention: Hea1·ing Docket Clerk,

### AGC~430 Wilbur Wright 

### Building-- Suite 

### 2WlOOO 600 Independence A vc. SW Washington, D.C. 20591



### Mr. Kyle 

## c. Lomazow Pederal 

### A vintion 

### Administration Office of Regional Counsel

- ANM- 7 Northwest Mountain Region 

### 1601 Li11d Avenue, 

### SW RcnLon, W A 98057



### Dated this 14 111 day()[ August, 

### 2012**..£--~** /'**~-** ?---<._

...**~·····--** ......... . 

## "'" 

# ---- ---·--- KentS. Jackson A 

### ITORNEY FOR RESPONDENT

600/GOO**~ s~o**  

## .. ZPLSEBPZOZ**XV~** LL:OL ZLOZ/86/80
# EUR-Lex - 31989R3777 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31989R3777

**Council Regulation (EEC, Euratom, ECSC) No 3777/89 of 14 December 1989 adapting the representation and special- duty allowances for the president and members of the Commission, the president, judges, advocates-general and registrar of the Court of justice and the president, members and registrar of the Court of first instance **

*
Official Journal L 367 , 16/12/1989 P. 0001 - 0001 *

*****

COUNCIL REGULATION (EEC, EURATOM, ECSC) No 3777/89

of 14 December 1989

adapting the representation and special-duty allowances for the President and members of the Commission, the President, Judges, Advocates-General and Registrar of the Court of Justice and the President, members and Registrar of the Court of First Instance

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 422/67/EEC, No 5/67/Euratom of 25 July 1967 determining the emoluments of the President and members of the Commission, of the President, Judges, Advocates-General and Registrar of the Court of Justice and the President, members and Registrar of the Court of First Instance (1), as last amended by Regulation (ECSC, EEC, Euratom) No 4046/88 (2), and in particular Article 4 (4) thereof,

Having regard to Council Regulation (Euratom, ECSC, EEC) No 4045/88 of 19 December 1988 laying down the emoluments of the President, members and Registrar of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities (3) and amending accordingly the above Regulation No 422/67/EEC, No 5/67/Euratom,

Whreas the representation and special-duty allowances provided for under Articles 4 (2) and (3), and 21a (3) of Regulation No 422/67/EEC, No 5/67/Euratom should be increased,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

With effect from 1 July 1989:

(a) the amounts given in Article 4 (2) of Regulation (EEC) No 422/67/EEC, No 5/67/Euratom are as follows:

- President: Bfrs 50 955,

- Vice-President: Bfrs 32 745,

- other members: Bfrs 21 835;

(b) the amounts given in the first subparagraph of Article 4 (3) of Regulation (EEC) No 422/67/EEC, No 5/67/Euratom are as follows:

- President: Bfrs 50 955,

- Judge or Advocate-General: Bfrs 21 835,

- Registrar: Bfrs 19 915;

(c) the amount given in the second subpragraph of Article 4 (3) of Regulation (EEC) No 422/67/EEC, No 5/67/Euratom is replaced by 'Bfrs 29 130'.

Article 2

With effect from 1 July :

(a) the amounts given in the first subparagraph of Article 21a (3) of Regulation No 422/67/EEC, No 5/67/Euratom are as follows:

- President: Bfrs 21 835,

- members: Bfrs 19 915,

- Registrar: Bfrs 16 935;

(b) the amount given in the second subparagraph of Article 21a (3) is replaced by 'Bfrs 26 570'.

Article 3

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 14 December 1989.

For the Council

The President

L. JOSPIN

(1) OJ No L 187, 8. 8. 1967, p. 1.

(2) OJ No L 356, 24. 12. 1988, p. 2.

(3) OJ No L 356, 24. 12. 1988, p. 1.
Editorial Note on Part 70
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 70 appear at 81 FR 86910, Dec. 2, 2016.

§ 70.11 Persons using special nuclear material under certain Department of Energy and Nuclear Regulatory Commission contracts. Except to the extent that Department facilities or activities of the types subject to licensing pursuant to section 202 of the Energy Reorganization Act of 1974 are involved, any prime contractor of the Department is exempt from the requirements for a license set forth in section 53 of the Act and from the regulations in this part to the extent that such contractor, under his prime contract with the Department receives title to, owns, acquires, delivers, receives, possesses, uses, or transfers special nuclear material for: ( a ) The performance of work for the Department at a United States Government-owned or controlled site, including the transportation of special nuclear material to or from such site and the performance of contract services during temporary interruptions of such transportation;
( b ) research in, or development, manufacture, storage, testing or transportation of, atomic weapons or components thereof; or
( c ) the use or operation of nuclear reactors or other nuclear devices in a United States Government-owned vehicle or vessel. In addition to the foregoing exemptions, and subject to the requirement for licensing of Department facilities and activities pursuant to section 202 of the Energy Reorganization Act of 1974, any prime contractor or subcontractor of the Department or the Commission is exempt from the requirements for a license set forth in section 53 of the Act and from the regulations in this part to the extent that such prime contractor or subcontractor receives title to, owns, acquires, delivers, receives, possesses, uses, or transfers special nuclear material under his prime contract or subcontract when the Commission determines that the exemption of the prime contractor or subcontractor is authorized by law; and that, under the terms of the contract or subcontract there is adequate assurance that the work thereunder can be accomplished without undue risk to the public health and safety.
[40 FR 14085, Mar. 28, 1975; 40 FR 16047, Apr. 9, 1975, as amended at 43 FR 6924, Feb. 17, 1978; 65 FR 54950, Sept. 12, 2000]
§ 71.6 Information collection requirements: OMB approval. ( a ) The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has submitted the information collection requirements contained in this part to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for approval as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 *et seq.*). The NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. OMB has approved the information collection requirements contained in this part under control number 3150-0008.
( b ) The approved information collection requirements contained in this part appear in §§ 71.5, 71.7, 71.9, 71.12, 71.17, 71.19, 71.22, 71.23, 71.31, 71.33, 71.35, 71.37, 71.38, 71.39, 71.41, 71.47, 71.85, 71.87, 71.89, 71.91, 71.93, 71.95, 71.97, 71.101, 71.103, 71.105, 71.106, 71.107, 71.109, 71.111, 71.113, 71.115, 71.117, 71.119, 71.121, 71.123, 71.125, 71.127, 71.129, 71.131, 71.133, 71.135, 71.137, and appendix A, paragraph II.
[69 FR 3786, Jan. 26, 2004, as amended at 75 FR 73945, Nov. 30, 2010; 80 FR 34012, June 12, 2015]
#### In the Matter of Sheila Levin, Appellant, v. Alfred C. Levin, Respondent.

In a support proceeding, petitioner appeals from an order of the Family Court, made in New York 'County on August 22, 1968 and entered in Queens County. In addition, we have reviewed a further order of said court dated ¡September 30, 1968 and made on reargument, which amended said order of August 22, 1968 ('CPLR 5517, subd. [b]). Motion by respondent, made on the calendar call, to transfer the appeal to the Appellate Division, First Department, denied. Order of August 22, 1968, modified, on the law, by striking from the ninth and tenth decretal paragraphs thereof the word "petitioner”. As so modified, order of August 22, 1968, as amended by the order of 'September 30, 1968, affirmed, without costs. The findings of fact below in support of the provisions in which petitioner was directed to submit to psychiatric examinations have not been affirmed. Since the proceeding was for support only, petitioner should not have been directed to appear for psychiatric examinations. Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, Rabin, Benjamin and Martuseello,' JJ., concur.
CASE ANNOUNCEMENTS

*January 29, 2008*

[Cite as *01/29/2008 Case Announcements,*2008-Ohio-283.]

MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS

2008-0057.

#### State v. Harris.

Cuyahoga App. No. 89128, 2007-0hio-6850. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal and claimed appeal of right. Upon consideration of appellant’s motion for stay of the court of appeals’ judgment,

It is ordered by the court that the motion is denied.

O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., dissent.