p.1 

OAR Box 1394 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

11) ll-B-6 

Docket Number: 

A-94-52 

Printed 7/3/2008 7:22:10 AM Sheet 11 of 57 
£7 IL7.1I7 HID 

1 

O PACIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. 

f~ i ^ctsf T)y.a. 

'jW'cx.X. r- ^ ° W f / 

^ 

P.2 

fff'B'6 

Central Park West 

5001 South Miami Boulevard 

PO Box 12077 

Research Triangle Park. NC 27709-2077 

(919)941-0333 FAX (919) 941-0234 

SITE VISIT REPORT 

TO: 

FROM: 

DATE: 

SUBJECT: 

Madeleine Strum 

ESD/CPB (MD-13) 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 

Greg LaFlam and Dean Carroll ^ ^ 

Pacific Environmental Services, Inc. (PES) ll 

November 18, 1993 

L:\N027 

Site Visit -- Glastic Corporation 

Cleveland, Ohio 

EPA Contract 68D10116; ESD Project 93/58 

PES Project N027 

FunuTM 

. 

S -£,s 'f\ / ","* IT*->~>,<r<-i> *-«-<-

f— '".- * a.. ^.•••,r.^f 

I. Purpose 

The purpose of the visit was to observe pultrusion and closed molding 

composites fabrication processes of the reinforced plastic composites 

industry. This information included the processes, emissions, and control 

measures in use at the facility, and will be used in the development of a 

Maximum Achievable Control Technology (MACT) standard for the reinforced 

plastic composites production source category. 

This site visit was part of a 3-day trip to observe operations at six 

composite facilities by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), its 

contractor, Pacific Environmental Services, Inc. (PES), and representatives of 

two industry trade associations: The Composites Institute of the Society of 

the Plastics Industry, and the Composites Fabricators Association (CFA). 

II. Place and Date 

Glastic Corporation 

4321 Glenridge Road 

South Euclid (Cleveland), Ohio 44121-2891 

August 11, 1993 8:00 a.m. - 11:45 a.m. 
P.3 

r 

a 

in. Participants 

Glastic 

Mr. Glenn Grant, President and Chief Executive Officer 

Mr. Robert Sedlatschek, Vice President of Engineering 

Ms. Janet Boyer, Environmental Engineer 

U.S. EPA 

Ms. Madeleine Strum, Project Manager 

Pacific Environmental Services. Inc. fPES) 

Mr. Greg LaFlam, Environmental Engineer 

Mr. Dean Carroll, Environmental Engineer 

The SPI Composites Institute 

Mr. John Schweitzer, Technical Director 

Composites Fabricators Association 

Mr. Steve McNally, Director of Government Affairs 

IV. Discussion 

The visit began in the facility's conference room, where Glastic staff 

made a presentation concerning the facility's environmental history, 

processes, emissions, control measures, and current environmental program. 

Glastic is in a nonattainment area (what State/local regulations is the 

facility subject to?). A handout (23 pages) was provided to the participants 

to accompany the presentation, and is attached to this report. At 10:00 a.m., 

a tour of the process operations at the facility was taken. The tour 

concluded at 11:30 a.m. back in the conference room, where final questions 

were asked in a brief session. Glastic indicated that no portions of the site 

visit would consist of confidential business information. 

A. History 

The company launched an intensive environmental program after the local 

community became agitated over styrene odors being created by the plant. (The 

nearest residence is approximately 450 feet from the plant.) Through its 

efforts to reduce emissions, the company improved the situation and created an 

atmosphere in which the community is satisfied. Volatile organic compound 

(VOC) and hazardous air pollutant (HAP) reductions were achieved through a 

combination of product substitution, operating practices designed to reduce 

fugitive emissions, and carbon filtration units to adsorb captured emissions. 

The company's objective is to reduce its annual VOC emissions from 209,100 

pounds in late 1991 to 11,550 pounds per year. (Is this South Euclid only, or 

Jefferson also?) As of July 1993, the company had achieved about 77 percent 
P.4 

s p& 

lS 

of this goal. Company officials estimated that 4.5 to 5 percent of the 

styrene used in the facility is lost as emissions. 

B. Processes and Products 

Glastic Corporation operates two facilities, one in Jefferson, Ohio and 

one in South Euclid (Cleveland), Ohio. The Jefferson plant carries out 

injection molding of precision, complex parts. The main plant in Cleveland 

(275 employees in three shifts) has four main process areas: 1) laminate 

production, 2) compression molding, 3) pultrusion, and 4) manufacture of bulk 

molding compound (BMC). These four process/product areas, as well as some 

additional operational areas, are described below in the order in which they 

were observed at the facility. 

1. Laminate Production 

Laminates are 3 x 6 foot or 4 x 8 foot sheets (0.030n-ln thick) produced 

on any of nine compression molding presses (250-750 ton). They are used as 

thermal, electrical, and corrosion insulating barriers and in a variety of 

structural applications. Composition is 20 percent liquid resin (which 1s 25 

percent styrene monomer), 25 percent glass reinforcement, and 55 percent other 

materials (additives and fillers). 

Resin is hand or machine spread onto an E-glass fiber sheet (continuous 

strand mat) which has been placed into a press. (Several sheets and resin 

layers may go into some laminates.) Curing in the heated press takes from 1 

to 30 minutes, depending on the sheet thickness. Prepared resin material is 

stored at each press in movable "totes," in which catalyzed resin can be kept 

for up to 2 days. Stainless steel covers on the totes are kept closed at all 

times to prevent styrene losses. Resin is dispensed into smaller buckets for 

hand application of resin and pumped through enclosed lines for machine 

application. Roughly one drum of waste resin is accumulated per month. 

Laminates account for 45 percent of the sales for the facility. 

2. Resin Mixing 

Resin mixes for the lamination and pultrusion processes are prepared in 

a 2-floor mixing and storage area. Resin is mixed alternately in two 

Morehouse mixers located on the second floor above the tote cool storage area. 

Resin mix in four different color choices is pumped into the totes through 

four separate color-dedicated pumps. A flexible hose routes organic vapors 

from the totes (or mixers?) during filling to the carbon filters on the roof 

of the building. A closed filler feeder, which can pivot to each of the 

mixers, had just been reworked and was due to be re-installed adjacent to the 

mixers. The dust created as dry filler materials are added is routed through 

a stack and collected in dust baghouse filters on the building roof. Vapors 

are also collected from the mixers and routed to the carbon filter system. 
P.5 

S3 

3. Bulk Molding Compound 

Bulk molding compound (BMC) is produced in two Shar mixers and a 

Littleford (L-600) mixer located on the first floor. For the Shar mixers, dry 

ingredients are added from a two-part hopper (glass/fillers) on the second 

floor. Dust is collected from the top of the hopper and sent to the filter 

houses. Vapors from the mixers are routed to the carbon system just before 

the doors to the mixers are opened. Dry materials are added to the L-600 

mixer by hand. BMC is used in the facility's compression molding processes 

and is sold on the open market (15 percent of sales). (How is BMC handled 

after being mixed?) 

4. Compression Molding 

Compression molding of BMC, carried out on 11 presses, accounts for 3 to 

4 percent of sales. Products include primarily housewares components. 

5. Pultrusion 

The facility operates 16 pultrusion lines, which produce industrial 

electrical fuse tube, insulated door panels, scuff liners for truck cargo 

compartments, fiber optic rod, and miscellaneous custom shapes. 

The, majority of pultruded products are made on 13 machines. Two methods 

were in use for limiting the escape of VOC vapors from the 13 lines. One 

involved the use of resin injected dies, in which resin is pumped directly 

into the front end of the forming die (rather than wetting out the 

reinforcement in an open resin pan). This eliminates the exposed resin 

surfaces normally experienced upstream of the die. The other method involved 

six or seven lines having transparent vinyl strip curtains installed around 

the resin pan in order to reduce air flow over (and hence emissions from) the 

pan. For some of the lines with open resin pans, the size of the drip pan and 

plate collecting excess resin had been reduced. 

Fiber optic rod (FOR), supplied to the communications industry, is 

produced on three pultrusion lines. An epoxy resin is used to wet out the 

reinforcement, and curing is accomplished by means of six ultraviolet (UV) 

lamps. A hood over the resin impregnation area removes vapors from the line, 

which are routed to the plant's carbon filter system. FOR is produced at 

about 200 feet per minute. 

C. Waste Handlinq and Clean-up 

Waste resins are treated with a chemical known as Poly-Hib, which 

retards the curing process. These unpolymerized materials are marked as 

hazardous waste and may be stored at the facility for up to 90 days. A 

company called Chemical Solvents hauls the drums to a facility where the waste 

resin is used in fuel blending. Glastic uses no process water and has no 

wastewater issues. 

Totes (40-50 are on hand) brought back from the production floor are 

cleaned using an automated system in which methyl methacrylate (MMA) is pumped 
P.6 

jr 

into the covered tote through an atomizing wand. Based on the weight of the 

tote versus its tare weight, the correct amount of MMA is automatically 

delivered through the wand. Approximately 8 to 10 totes are cleaned per day 

in a 30-40 minute cycle. MMA vapors exit the tote through a flexible hose for 

recovery by the plant's carbon filtration system. (How is the spent MMA 

handled? Please describe the process.) 

The facility is pursuing a program to reduce VOC and HAP emissions from 

its use of solvents for cleaning operations. The primary cleaning solvent 

used is a blend referred to as Solvent 65, supplied by Chemical Solvents. 

(For what cleaning operations is this solvent used?) Another cleaner being 

evaluated (and in use at the Jefferson facility) is called Envirosolv 2000, by 

Envirosolv, Inc. Neither of these has any HAP content. The company has 

eliminated the use of Solvent 85, a blend containing toluene; 1,1,1-trichloroethane; and methylene chloride. 

OTHER QUESTIONS: 

1. How much waste resin is collected from each operation (pultrusion, 

lamination, closed molding, BMC production)? 

2. How often is the waste resin collected from each operation? 

3. Please describe the cleanup operation for each of the above 

operations. 

4. Is styrene monomer ever used as a cleaning material? 

D. VOC/HAP Control Measures 

As a result of its experiences with the community, Glastic has initiated 

an environmental policy and objectives for the Cleveland facility. One goal 

is to reduce the 1991 annual VOC emission rate from 209,100 lb (105 tons) to 

11,550 lb (5.8 tons), or by 94 percent. According to the company's estimates, 

emissions in July 1993 were about 57,200 lb (29 tons). This represents an 

emission reduction of 73 percent, which is 77 percent of its target. 

The company's emission reduction goals were met through the following 

control measures: 

Cleaning solvent replacement. The switch from Solvent 85 to Solvent 65 

and Envirosolv 2000 has reduced VOC emissions by about 93,100 lb/yr (46 TPY). 

The HAPs toluene; 1,1,1-trichloroethane; and methylene chloride have been 

eliminated in the solvents used. The new Solvent 65 has some disadvantages, 

such as slower evaporation, higher cost (36 percent), and objectionable odor 

(the company added a pine-scented cleaner). Envirosolv 2000, in use at the 

Jefferson facility, is under evaluation for use at Cleveland. This cleaner 

can be re-used up to 40 times, according to the manufacturer. (Please send 

copies of the NSDS for Solvent 65 and Envirosolv 2000.) 

Reduction of fugitive emissions. The facility has introduced several 

changes into its mixing and tote storage areas that reduce the amount of 
P.7 

/ 

s-•g 

cleaning operations necessary and create a closed system for the emitting 

materials. The four colors of resins (red, black, white, and tan) are pumped 

by individual, color-dedicated pumps from the mixers to the resin totes. This 

has eliminated the cleaning previously needed when the single pump providing 

all four colors was undergoing a color change. All resin transfers are made 

in a closed system into containers with tight-fitting lids. (Please describe 

these containers in greater detail.) Quick-disconnect fittings are used for 

the lines used to fill and vent the system. Venting from the closed vessels 

occurs at specific times in the mixing and tote cleaning cycles in order to 

capture the maximum concentrations generated, and emissions are routed to the 

carbon filter system. 

Carbon filter system. The company has designed its own control system 

consisting of 20 passive filter housings mounted on the roof of the production 

building. Five of the housings (in place since February 1993) each contain 

(48) 1 ft x 2 ft, 6-inch deep filter panels, containing 30 lbs of activated 

carbon each. The filters are weighed weekly and, upon 7 lb weight gain, are 

sent out for regeneration. (Mho does this regeneration and how is it done?) 

The rest of the housings, which have been in place for a longer time, are 

situated directly above the several^ 20,000 cfm plant exhaust fans, and each 

contains (48) 2-inch (some contain 4-inch) deep filter panels. These panels 

are disposed of after use, and cost about $50 per pound of VOC controlled. 

The company emphasized that the system is still under development, and that 

they would not configure the system in this way if they were to begin again 

(plans are to change out the throwaway filters and collect from specific point 

source operations). 

Testing on the carbon filter so far indicates that inlet VOC 

concentrations should be in the 20 to 300 ppm range for good control 

efficiency. Each filter system (48 cartridges) is designed to handle 500 to 

1,000 cfm. Estimated costs are $9 per pound of VOC controlled (not including 

capital and labor costs). Glastic estimates that annual filter costs could be 

on the order of $250,000. 

E. Action Items 

Ms. Boyer of Glastic agreed to send copies of several MSDSs to PES, and 

to make available the consultant reports that provided the basis for Glastic's 

environmental program. Ms. Strum of EPA agreed to send information on the 

Polyad adsorption system to Glastic. 

Attached to this report are the sheets Glastic provided during the 

visit. Contents are as follows: 

Subject Page 

1. Company facts 1 

2. Cleveland plant layout 2 

3. Environmental policy 3 

4. Consultant reports 4-5 

5. Program objectives 6 
P.8 

. % 

s 

/ 

/ 

6. Reduction strategies 7 

7. Solvent replacement 8-9 

8. Reduction of fugitives 10-15 

9. Carbon filtration 16-23 

Glastic also provided a report (attached) summarizing styrene measurements 

taken at an injection molding press at the Jefferson facility in March 1993. 

This test involved use of a temporary total enclosure to capture emissions. 

The test showed a styrene emission rate of 1.1 percent of the available 

styrene entering the molding process. 
P.9 

GLASTIC CORPORATION 

OWNERSHIP 

Kobe Steel USA 85% 

ItochuCo. 15% 

FACILITIES 

South Euclid, Ohio Headquarters and Main Plant- 128,000 sq. ft 

Jefferson, Ohio Injection Molding- 90,000 sq. ft 

ANNUAL SALES 

South Euclid $35,000,000 

Jefferson $15,000,000 

PRODUCTS AND PROCESSES 

Laminates- 3'x6', 4'x8' Sheets for: 

Electrical Insulation 

Thermal Insulation 

Corrosion Resistance 

Structural Applications 

Compression and Injection Molded Parts 

Electrical Insulators, Circuit Breakers 

Motor Components 

Housewares Components- Disposers, Sewing Machines, Vacs, Fuses et< 

Printer Frames 

Pultruded Shapes 

Electrical Insulation, Fuse Tubes 

Custom Shapes for Trucks, Sporting Goods etc. 

Fiber Optic Rod 

Buld Molding Compounds 

RAW MATERIALS 

Fiberglass, Mineral Fillers, Polyester Resins, Epoxy Resins, Phenolic, 

Monomers (Styrene, Vinyl Toluene, and Methylmethacylate.) 

't 
MOREHOUS BMC CART 

TOTE TANK ANO SHAR T-M O OXANINC BMC RE9N »MC MONOMER 

OIANER MIXERS MIXER AREA EXTRUOERS .TAWS , STOHAOI! .TANKS 

* 
P.11 

A SUBSIDIARY Of 

K06€ STER 

ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY 

As a result of its planning and development activities, Glastic Corporation 

expects to grow and prosper within the community of South Euclid. The 

management and owners of Glastic fully recognize that this growth requires the 

Company to be, and to be viewed as, a good community citizen. The health and 

well being of our neighbors and workers are among our highest priorities. 

Glastic's Policy is to: 

• Conduct operations in compliance with all local, state, and federal 

environmental regulations 

• Be particularly aware of its location in a residential community, and 

to work to develop and maintain an open dialogue with the 

community residents and their elected officials 

• Reduce plant emissions to meet the 1997 requirements of the CLEAN 

AIR ACT AMENDMENTS by the end of 1993. 

• Eliminate nuisance odors 

• Develop and maintain the best available control technology for all its 

processes 

• Continue noise abatement programs 

• Comply with local, state, and federal storm and waste water 

regulations 

Glastic will commit the financial and human resources necessary to successfully 

implement this policy and expects to be viewed in the future as an integral and 

responsible part of the South Euclid/Euclid Community 

p. i 

lo 
P.12 

GLASTIC CORP 

CONSULTANT REPORTS 

COMPOSITE SERVICES CORPORATION 

1. HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT - CLEVELAND 

2. SOLVENT 85 

3. MIXING AREA REPORT 

4. FIBER OPTICS LINE STUDY 

5. HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT - JEFFERSON 

\\ V 
P.13 

CONSULTANT REPORT SUMMARIES 

1991 ESTIMATED EMISSIONS: 

MONOMERS 

STYRENE 

VINYL TOLUENE 

MMA 

SOLVENT (SS~) 

1,1,1-TRICLOROETHANE 

METHYLENE CHLORIDE 

TOLUENE 

TOTAL 

CLEVELAND 

59000 

12000 

42000 

4700 

30400 

61000 

209100 

JEFFERSON 

44940 

16400 

3270 

3380 

1690 

69680 

1991 HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT BASED ON ABOVE (ISCST2 PROGRAM): 

POSSIBLE CARCINOGENS- Methlyene Chloride is five times less than OEPA's cancer risk 

threshold level of 1 per 100,000. Avg. annual exposure is 860 times less thanthe amount to 

cause one additional cancer case. 

NONCANCER HEALTH EFFECTS- Several orders of magnitude below OEPA threshold limits. 

consums 

\o 
OVERALL SUMMARY - EMISSION REDUCTION PROGRAM OBJECTIVES 

LATE'91 SOLV 85 CLOSED FILTERS TARGET 

RATE SYSTEMS JLBS/YR) 

PLAN: 

STORAGE TANKS 

MIXING AREA 

LAMINATE/C&T 

PULTRUSION 

FOR 

TOTE ROOM 

EPA/DRUM AREAS 

1920 

97020 

25790 

52850 

1380 

20230 

9910 

209100 

0 

-45050 

-19220 

-19220 

0 

0 

-9610 

-93100 

0 

-46020 

-2000 

-15000 

-500 

-12230 

-200 

-75950 

0 

-4000 

-3000 

-15000 

-500 

-6000 

0 

-28500 

1920 

1950 

1570 

3630 

. 380 

2000 

100 

11550 

ACTUAL: 

EMISSION REDUCTION PROGRAM STATUS - JULY 1993 

STORAGE TANKS 

MIXING AREA 

LAMINATE/C&T 

PULTRUSION 

FOR 

TOTE ROOM 

EPA/DRUM AREAS 

LATE'91 

RATE 

1920 

97020 

25790 

52850 

1380 

20230 

9910 

209100 

SOLV 85 

0 

-45050 

-19220 

-19220 

0 

0 

-9610 

-93100 

CLOSED 

SYSTEMS 

0 

-32360 

0 

-1500 

-500 

-12230 

-200 

-46790 

FILTERS 

0 

-4000 

-300 

-1.500 

-200 

-6000 

0 

-12000 

NEEDED 

TARGET 

0 

13660 

4700 

27000 

300 

0 

0 

45660 

n 
P.15 

REDUCTION STRATEGIES 

1) REPLACE SOLVENT 85 (-93,000 lbs annually) 

- Solvent 65 

- Envirosolv 2000 

2) REDUCE FUGITIVES (-76,000 lbs annually) 

- Reduce Cleaning Operations 

' - Close Up Resin/Monomer Transfers 

- Reduce Resin/Monomer Evaporation 

3) CARBON FILTRATION (-29,000 lbs annually) 

- Roof Top Filter Houses/Refillable Filters 

- Attention Tb Details Is Important 

4) TEMP. TOTAL ENCLOSURE TESTING- JEFFERSON INJECTION PRESS. 

- 1.1% Process Loss of Available Styrene 

14-
P.16 

SOLVENT REPLACEMENT 

15 
P.17 

SOLVENT COMPARISONS 

ITEM 

EVAPORATION RATE 

EFFECTIVENESS 

COST 

ODOR 

HAP COMPONENTS 

MFG 

COMMENTS 

SOLVENT 85 

VERY HIGH 

EXCELLENT 

$6.67/GALLON 

OK 

TOLUENE 

1.1.1 TRICLOR. 

METHLENE CHLORIDE 

CHEMICAL SOLVTS 

CLEVELAND 

PHASED OUT 

SOLVENT 65 

LOW 

OK 

S9.07/GALLON 

PROBLEM 

NONE 

CHEMICAL SOLVENTS 

CLEVELAND 

USED AT CLEVELAND 

ENVIROSOLV 

2000 

LOW 

GOOD 

$24/GALLON 

OK 

NONE 

ENVIROSOLV 

JACKSONV1LL 

USED AT JEF 

UP TO 40 

REUSES CLAIMED 

BY MANUFACTURER 

solvents 

If, 
P.18 

REDUCTION OF FUGITIVES 

-CONTAINMENT1-7 
P.19 

OLASTIC EVAPORATION TEST 

WEIGHT LOSS VBRSUS TIMB 

EFFECT OF AIRFLOW CONDITION 

STYRENB RBSIN LIQUID 

25 

20 

-STILL AIR i 

-HOOD AIR 

i l 

37j*Fffl« 

37i^Mooom« 

ttfcgC 

13 

10 

5 H 

TIME 

(min) 

I % 
P.20 

45 

40 

35 

30 

25 

20 

15 

10 

5 

0 

GLASTIC EVAPORATION TEST 

WEIGHT LOSS VERSUS TEMB 

BFFBCT OF TEMPERATURE 

STYRENE BULK MOLDING COMPOUND 

^20'degC-

- 3 5 deg C 

•50 deg C 

Hood Airflow 

TIME 

(min) 

14 
P.21 

BEFORE 

(2;-.N£S-«* 

i-p I'O 

MIXING AREA "VOC" ANALYSIS 

(«;-L:NE S • 

NEW SYSTEM 

CLOSED rEEO 

-AOO PUMPS 

LWC VALVES 

TO REOUCE 

CUANINC 

-UOREXLfSt CART 

O.0SC CIEAMNG 

-COMPUTE* CONTROLLED 

VENT.NG. '5)->»>CES 

-CYUCC= CONTROLLED 

OVER CARTS 

UPOATE: 12/I0/9 J C 

FORMAT' WEXA? 

•7,o 
P.22 

SHAR MIXER ENVIRONMENTAL 

CONTROL SYSTEM 

FILTER HOUSE 

10'xlO* 48 FILTERS 

96 FT2 FILTER AREA 

1440 LBS. CARBON 

<Q? 

BLOWER 

VAPOR 

EXHAUST DUCT 

< & 

- ^ 

V 

BLOWER 

350 CFM, 1 1/2"S.P. 

MIXER 

PLC CONTROLLED 

PNEUMATIC GATE 

VAPOR 

EXHAUST DUCT 

/ 

PLC CONTROLLED 

BLAST GATE 

550 GALLON 

KETTLE 

PLC CONTROLLED 

PNEUMATIC BALL VALVE 

QUICK 

DISCONNECTS 

SEALED LIDLIQUID LEVEL 

PROBE TO 

PLC 

300 GALLON 

TOTE 

LT D 

PLC .A 

CONTROL PANEL 

•7.1 
P.23 

BEFORE 

RBERGLASS 

ROVING 

52850 

1 

axo 

,1-, 

I OUST 

COLLECTOR 

19220 ft 

CUT OFF 

SAW 

SOLVENT LJ 

PULTRUSION 3000 

AFTER 

l 

RLTER 

SYSTEM 

rL, 

I OUST 

COLLECTOR 

RBERGLASS 

ROVING 

RESIN 

ORUM 

15000 

DRIP 

IPLATEJ 

ENCLOSED W/ 

PLEXIGLASS, & 

CURTAINS 

ft 

CUT OFF 

SAW 

VENT 

•7. ?. 
P.24 

CARBON FILTRATION 

PREDICTIONS FROM ADSORPTION ISOTHERMS: 

- On the order of 25% adsorption capacity (lbs VOC/lbs C) is indicated. 

- Higher concentrations favor higher capacity. 

- Lower temperatures favor higher capacity. 

DESIGN ISSUES AND APPROACH 

- Use coconut shell charcoal. 

- Maintain high residence time ( > 1/8 second). 

- Keep VOC concentrations in the 20 to 300 ppm range. 

- Avoid wetness. 

- Charcoal regeneration is essential for cost effectiveness. 

- Filter houses containing 48,1'x2'x6" filters, 30lbs carbon each. 

PLCs and point source control assures high VOC concentration. 

Blowers engineered to handle Tf pressure drop at correct CFM. 

RESULTS SO FAR: 

- Lab testing showed anticipated adsorption and adsorption capacity. 

- Subjective testing on 6" roof top units indicate odors to be significantly reduced. 

- Evaluation of recently installed filter houses shows weight gains. 

Chemical analysis of media shows both VOC and Water Vapor. 

- Life cycle adsorption costs estimated to be on the order of $9 per Ib VOC. 

(assuming 7 lbs VOC per filter and 3 regeneration cycles) 

GOING FORWARD: 

- Measurements of mix area systems' exhaust VOC input to filter houses and 

accurate comparision to filter house weight gains. 

- Evaluate humidity affects. 

- Confirm ability to regenerate carbon. 

- Deep bed systems vs filter houses may be considered. 

- International Filters Inc in-situ carbon regeneration system will be studied. 

Uses microwaves to remove VOC from carbon. VOC maybe reusable. 

- On going testing of all systems. 

7.2, 
P.25 

* 

u 

o 

o 

< 

Cd 

(X 

>-

H 

Z 

o 

ffi 

< 

o 

tf 

w 

w 

O 

CO 

z 

o 

E -

a 

tf 

© 

co 

< 

W 

CO 

< 

1 " I 1 ^ 1 1 1 

tf 

o 

Ck 

< 

> 

c 

k 

>» 

eo 

e 

e 

o 

a 

H 

o 

v 

o 

N 

c* 

CM 

o 

u 

3 

P. 

E 

J U . 

o 

o 

s 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

o 

© 

o 

c 

< 

tt. 

v 

» 

•t 

-at 

o Ou ? 

j i, ,i,l i 

o ., 

'•2

 s 

2 r 2 -

-. O £ 

.1 : i.J— L 

o 

o 

$ 

© 

o 

o 

e 

o 

« 5 

I o 

O 

0 ». 

F. 

£ 

(uoqjBQ taJ/paqaospv ui*) iC^iOBd^o nondjoepy 

IAKNUCY ^ jvTcurre cov 

A*w«N« C«^«* *** *«nl«M«n (»•"» « 

P 0. B0( Hit 

C*Mnbu«.ONo«Mi» 

BAS03H 

TECHNICAL DEPARTMENT REV. 

j TW$TEO*flCAl MFORMATION REMAINS TK EXCUAttS P«0*€BTV Of BARMSKV 

t SL/TCltt € COAKKUTON. Alt AUTHC*»0C0«»«$ AM 10*1*0 »«OOOOfAlTM 

I AN0SVmXCTTOAHLmNUPOHREOUCST.ANVFUATHCRR£P<IOOuCTCNWnH0uT 

! TKC0N«KTC#8ARNtlEV ISVTCL*»CC0M)^U>O«i«TK«Mi»v>n0H«l*fD. 

<24 
*1 © 

g is 

S* § 

s is 

O 

lis? 

Eiis i o's * 

mi 1 

* '"QS > rr 

*&£* 

o3 

P a x •« 

md 

u 

o 

en 

m 

« 

d 

o 

o. 

hi 

o 

0) 

•n 

VAPOR PHASE ADSORPTION ISOTHERM FOR CARBON TYPE AC or 1261 

— 10' 

o 

-O 

u 

tf 

^ 

io-1. 

. IIIIIII I i i mm.] i IIIIIII | i n i ITHI i'i nun; i i i mm i iliu m i i'»i" | T-TTTTTTJ 

Component : Methyl Methacrylate 

10 - 2 

_4ym*j4/-*£»'4+~-mm. 

i IIIIIII I i iiiim l i • imii l . IIIIII I 

Tsmper 

» « « 

ature 32 77 A 90 P 

Ail i l i iiiim l i tiiiin l i i.iiin l i IIIIII I 

0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 * 10 100 1000 1O00O 1ooooo 

Concentration (ppm) 

The Jbor r ftclhtrm »'«» Cetera tret ('sin? Tt.* Pnlani Theory And UEKZENE A* Th* /f*f*rrnct Componm t 
P.27 

Absorption vs Evaporation of Styrene (Test #8) 

6 Inch Carbon Fflter without Paniculate 

4 5 6 

Es-aporated (pounds) 

10 

SLIDC ^a-Ve. ExVwvxST PvxcT 

BCou^fc4" CMZort 

F, | tC d 

CiO-StetT/rD 

£0<*£S 

oP^w 6>oTr^n\ 

26 
I T "7T 

\ / 

l/4?"X47*\ l 

'X&r^l&faj&.&mZ-X-myZmm-i-ZL ^ l 

120.50 

<; i A 1 I <• I I I i r R HOUS E 

IJ-UNII'j 10 V.I I ON *>ltHOIOAMl UNMH i X 10 A 2 X 4 WOMANI/t D LUMBER 

OiRtClLY ON IHE CRAVLL Ko6F ROOF GRAVEL WILL BE SWEI'1 HACK CHANCCS 

CAN BE MADE TO FUTURE INSTALLATION OF CURBS ON LATER UNITS. 

2)-R00F OF HOUSING TOP TO BE APPROXIMATELY U'-O" X 13'-0" 18 GALVANIZED 

MANDINi; MAM 1101.11. l> ll) MDl MOUMNi; OVt KlAI* 'OR WAU K DIVERSIONS TO 

BF 18'* ON I ACH SIDE. ROOF TO HAVE A J" PITCH IN 10" 10 ALLOW FOR 

DRAINAGE 

3)-FiLTER RACKS TO HAVE 48 LOCATIONS TO RECEIVE V X 2" FILTERS WITH 

PROVISIONS TOR 16 ADDITIONAL LOCATIONS WITHOUT MAJOR MODIFICATIONS. 

UPRIGHT CHANNELS TO BE 18 GAUGE WITH 24 GAUGE BLANK OFFSETS tc 

IM.'JO HORIZONTAL flLIER HOLDERS POPRIVETEU TOGETHER. TWO FRAME UNITS TO 

nr •-.cHFwrn IN TO AIIOW ACCFV; TO IAN INSIOF 

NOTE: All FHTFRr. ARF. 3BR"X l?M)"X 2JM)"LC. 

IOIAL Of (Ii4) lllllK' i 1*1 U IIOUJ I 

TOTAL Of (10) ULlERS I'LH. WALL. 

•2X 4 WOOD FRAME 

ROOF UNF 

Corporation 

p » MtMTtM 

HMMtftlU I'LANI IILUM HACK HOUOINU 

PLANT ROOF 026 

ro 

oo 
P.29 

Sander Filter Weight Gain 

11 14 23 

TME(DAYS) 

36 43 

-7. a 
P.30 

Morehouse/Shar Filter Weight Gain 

8 11 17 

TIME(DAYS) 

30 37 

-Z<? 
P.31 

WHAT WE'VE GOT: 

SUMMARY 

GREATLY REDUCED FENCE LINE ODORS 

A SOUND BASIS FOR ATTAINING "NON MAJOR SOURCE" STATUS 

A GOOD RELATIONSHIP WITH THE CITY AND LOCAL CITIZENS. 

WHAT WE'VE PAID: 

PROJ. # 

5856 

5865 

5884 

5887 

5910 

PROJECT 

AIR TESTING 

MIXER REPORT 

FOR & SOLV 85 RPTS 

HEALTH RISKS (2) 

PURCHASES 

(000's) 

150 

18 FILTER SYSTEMS 156 

PULTRUSION SHIELDS 

WEATHER STATION 

MIX/TOTE ROOMS 

INCL 6" FILTERS 

PLC CONTROL 

FILLER FEEDER 

CLEANING RED'N 

STORM WATER BMP 

ST. WATER IMPTS 

235 

5 

6 

LABOR 

(OOO'S) 

5 

3 

70 

0 

0 

5898 

s 

"•a 

PC & SOFTWARE 4 0 

TOTALS 556 78 634 

ESTIMATED ONGOING FILTER COSTS ARE ON THE ORDER OF $250,000 ANNUALLY. 

OUR THOUGHTS: 

CONTAINMENT IS THE KEY TO A SUCCESSFUL ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRAM. 

INVESTMENTS IN COVERS. LIDS. HOSES. PUMPS. VALVES. CURTAINS. REDUCED WET 

AREA. PROCEDURES. TRAINING. DISCIPLINE AND THE UKE HAVE THE BEST PAYOFFS. 

CARBON FILTRATION, WHERE UNAVOIDABLE FUGITIVES OCCUR, SEEMS VIABLE FOR 

PLANTS SUCH AS GLASTIC. POINT SOURCE COLLECTION. CONCENTRATIONS OF 

10 TO 300 PPM. AND EXHAUST RATES OF LESS THAN 1000 CFM PROMOTE EFFICIENCY 

OPERATING COSTS ARE CURRENTLY ESTIMATED AT $9/LB VOC. 

Zo 
P.32 

MOLDING PRESS EMISSIONS TESTING 

GLASTIC CORPORATION 

JEFFERSON PLANT 

By 

Janet Boyer 

Environmental Engineer 

April 23, 1993 

3/ 
P.33 

On March 19, 1993, styrene emissions were measured from Press #29 

at the Glastic Corporation's Jefferson facility. The purpose of 

the testing was to obtain concrete data for emissions from the 

injection molding operation rather than assuming that 1.5-2.0% of 

the available styrene is emitted, per emission factors found in 

Compilation of Air Pollutant Emission Factors. US EPA, AP-42. 

Accurate emission rates are necessary for permit applications, 

calculating carbon filter requirements, and other reporting 

requirements. 

The testing was done following the protocol outlined in EPA-450/4-

91-020 The Measurement Solution: Using a Temporary Total Enclosure 

for Capture Efficiency Testing. A temporary total enclosure (TTE) 

is an enclosure installed specifically for emissions testing. It 

completely surrounds the affected facility such that all VOC 

emissions are captured and discharged through a duct that allows 

for the accurate measurement of VOC rates. In other words, a TTE 

is a temporarily installed enclosure that ensures that no VOC 

escapes without being measured. 

Minimum criteria have been developed for an enclosure to be 

considered a TTE for testing purposes. These criteria are intended 

to ensure that all VOC's are captured for measurement and to 

minimize disruption of the normal conditions in the absence of the 

enclosure. A TTE was constructed to meet the following minimum 

criteria: 

1. Any Natural Draft Opening (NDO) shall be at least 4 equivalent 

diameters from each VOC-emitting point. That is, our inlet 

was an adequate distance from the press. 

2. Any exhaust point from the enclosure shall be at least 4 

equivalent duct or hood diameters from each NDO. 

3. The total area of all NDO's shall not exceed 5 percent of the 

enclosure's walls, floor, and ceiling. 

4. The. average face velocity (FV) of air through all NDO's shall 

be at least 200 ft/min. The direction of air through all 

NDO's shall be into the enclosure. 

5. All access doors and windows whose areas are not included as 

NDO's and are not included in the calculation of FV shall be 

closed during routine operation of the process. 

A TTE was constructed around press #29 . One of the reasons that 

this press was chosen was because there were already two existing 

walls. Two additional walls were built from clear plastic film on 

a wood frame. An existing door was used as a Natural Draft Opening 

(NDO) to allow plenty of air for the workers inside the enclosure. 

The door was partially blocked to achieve a minimum face velocity 

of 200 ft/min. An exhaust fan was installed in an existing opening 

3Z 
P.34 

in the wall behind the press. A cardboard duct was made for the 

air exiting the enclosure. The flow velocity measurements and the 

exit samples were taken in the duct. 

Duplicate samples were taken at three different locations during 

two separate sampling periods. Samples taken at the NDO "inlet" 

provide a background concentration. The samples taken at the 

exhaust duct "outlet" represent the concentration of styrene from 

press #29 plus background. Samples were also taken at the dust 

collector to verify estimated emissions. Two of the samples on the 

report, Inlet-2(A) and Outlet-2(A), appear to possibly be swapped. 

For this reason, these numbers were omitted from the calculation of 

averages. Even if the results were correct, dropping these numbers 

will only make our calculations more conservative. 

The average inlet, or background, concentration was 3.52 ppm. The 

average concentration at the outlet, or exhaust, was 5.16 ppm. 

This indicates that there is a net gain of 1.64 ppm styrene from 

the emissions from press #29. The 1.64 ppm concentration of 

styrene converts to .13 lb/hr using the known exhaust rate of 706 

ft/min. The BMC was used at a rate of 176 pounds per hour during 

the test. The available styrene was 6.85% of the BMC assuming that 

the resin was 10% styrene. This means that 1.1% (0.011 lb/lb) of 

the available styrene was in the emissions, and that 0.08% (0.0008 

lb/lb) of the BMC results in styrene emissions. See attached 

calculations. 

The results of this test show that for the injection molding 

operations at the Jefferson facility of Glastic have an emission 

rate of about 1.1% of available styrene which is significantly 

lower than the 1.5-2.0% assumed by US EPA AP-42. 

3 3 
0 

Q> 

IV ts 

6T> 

CAL.Cu_uA T \fci ° > 

4 ET>i 

t > i £ 

"Di * 

= J 

Hf (n.-a- ^ 

IG.M -ft 

-TT 

c^£ 

4 . 5 -fv 

3 

f~±z flVVtfl 

er> nT TT 

'©* > 

A M>O ± o.oS L(2 * L x ^ + ( a * V * *tV(a * L- * A^ l 

u 

13.*\ -f-t3-

43. 5 Z\ 

13. ^ ft a £ 0.05- [_(* *

 M3, S

 * 26>)

 + CJ <

 ^ ^

 K ^.* 0 +(•** KS* lba A3 

i-b.^ ^ aao> ( oV^ 

(9 ^v 

rJto 3. S-5 A-1 v»\\</\ ,2 ©6 4*|w>\^ J&^l) 

3f 
P.36 

CAICULUA TIDE' S Uo' 0 1 "'^ ) 

V ^ l ^ + 3.G>^ pp ^ t" B>.5"V f>f»^ - 3, S «* pp ^ 

(g) A\/<i. ounuE/r oe>^ce.NJ"nf^Arvo^ 

g.C^ pp^s -+ 5,o5 <iy~> -t s-1 ^5 f p/y> - 5*. \6 Qpf*. 

3 

S\\C* (V ^ "" "3-3" 3* (Y*^1 "^ L6>4- pp.o^ 

|,6 t pp^ ^ 1^J>_-ELL K T ^ J±- x "'•V ^ A x ^0_a^3_|_jrv L _ 

\. <?o ^ ^»<a ^ 

K I LB ^ £0 ~\o - 6» / 3 3 Ui/H^ 

43-3,^0 0 >/*V\ \ K<-

W<tm. ==~ 

© UB | <-T* oP £>.v\C_ 

V7 6» <-&/Hi£- Vv\C 

35 
P.37 

.ANALYTICAL RESULTS 

FOR 

Glastic Corporation 

4321 Glenridge Road 

Cleveland, OH 44121 

Name of Collector: Kathy Royle 

ASSIGNED 

ASAP ID # 

930319-23-A 

930319-23-B 

930319-23-C 

930319-23-D 

930319-23-E 

930319-23-F 

930319-23-G 

930319-23-H 

930319-23-1 

930319-23-J 

930319-23-K 

930319-23-L 

CUSTOMER 

ID 

Inlet-l(A) 

Inlet-l(B) 

Outlet-l(A) 

Outlet-l(B) 

Dust Collector1(A) 

Dust Collector1(B) 

Inlet-2(A) 

Inlet-2(B) 

Outlet-2(A) 

Outlet02(B) 

Dust Collector2(A) 

Dust Collector2(B) 

Air 

Air 

Air 

Air 

Air 

Air 

Air 

Air 

Air 

Air 

Air 

Air 

SAMPLE 

MATRIX 

Sorbent 

Sorbent 

Sorbent 

Sorbent 

Sorbent 

Sorbent 

Sorbent 

Sorbent 

Sorbent 

Sorbent 

Sorbent 

Sorbent 

Tube 

Tube 

Tube 

Tube 

Tube 

Tube 

Tube 

Tube 

Tube 

Tube 

Tube 

Tube 

SITE, DATE 6 

TIME OF COLLECTION 

Press #29 

Jefferson Plant 

3/19/93 

9:45 am - 1:10 pm 

Laboratory Information: Samples were refrigerated upon receipt 

and analyzed as received. 

Released by: 

Husein Sitabkhan PhD. 

Lab Director 

Page 1 o f 2 

ASAP TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC 

19701 SOUTH MILES ROAD. WARRENSVILLE HEIGHTS. OHIO 44128 

TEL: (216) 663-0808 • (800) 969-0808 

FAX: (216) 663-0656 

3# 
P.38 

Date : 4/6/93 

Analysis For :Glastic Corporation 

Parameter: Styrene 

Date Received :3/19/93 

Date Analyzed :3/31/93 

ASAP #/CUSTOMER ID DL 

930319-23-A 

930319-23-B 

930319-23-C 

930319-23-D 

930319-23-E 

930319-23-F 

930319-23-G 

930319-23-H 

930319-23-1 

930319-23-J 

930319-23-K 

930319-23-L 

Inlet-l(A) 

Inlet-l(B) 

Outlet-l(A) 

Outlet-l(B) 

Dust CollectorDust Collector -

Inlet-2(A) 

Inlet-2(B) 

Outlet-2(A) 

Outlet02(B) 

Dust CollectorDust Collector -

-1(A) 

-1(B) 

-2(A) 

-2(B) 

0.02 

0.02 

0.02 

0.02 

0.02 

0.02 

0.02 

0.02 

0.02 

0.02 

0.02 

0.02 

ppm 

ppm 

ppm 

ppm 

ppm 

ppm 

ppm 

ppm 

ppm 

ppm 

ppm 

ppm 

RESULTS 

37 

69 

09 

05 

44 

18 

27-

,51 

81-

5.35 

5.34 

4.28 

Method Blank 0.02 /xg BDL 

DL = Detection Limit 

BDL = Below Detection Limit 

Method : NIOSH 1501 

Page 2 of 2 

ASAP TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC 

19701 SOUTH MILES ROAD. WARRENSVILLE HEIGHTS. OHIO 44128 

TEL: (216) 663-0808 • (800) 969-0808 

FAX: (216)663-0656 

^7 
. - J CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY 

ASAP TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC. 

19701 SOUTH MILES ROAD, WARRENSVILLE HEIGHTS, OHIO 44128-4257 

TEL: (216) 663-0808, (800) 969-0808 FAX: (216) 663-0656 

0bo?>/9 -££>/) "oLl*f 2-

(SUj-hc Corp COMPANY 

NAME 

COLLECTOR(S) NAME(S) print. A A 

COLLECTOR(S) SICNATURE(S) [\/ L 

TURN-AROUND (circle):S 24-hr 48-hr 

PRIORITY SERVICE APPROVED BY: 

CONTACT NAME 

CUSTOMER INFORMATION 

BILLING 

' ADDRESS 

CITY 

PARAMETER-SEE R 

72-hr One Week Regular 

TCLP 

SITE LOCATION: 

DATE LOGGED: 

PfKS**! fJlMrs*. MS 

3"/¥'S'P | VERBAL RESULTS DUE.T '<* -^ J SALESPERSON: 

WH. 

ASAP# 

CUSTOMER SAMPLE 

IDENTIFICATION 

No. of 

' DATE TIME SAMPLE CONCOLLECTED COLLECTED MATRIX TAINERS 

5: 

*S"!$ 

•o 

^ 

1 

5 

u: 

v5 

Q 

V 

w 

\ 

VERSE 

ADDRESS ¥3?' 6 fa///*J M 

STATE/ZIP _ A0T/V 

PHONE ( 

FAX ( ) . 

P.O. No. _ 

SAMPLES WILL BE DISPOSED OF IN 

ACCORDANCE WITH ASAP'S 

TERMS & CONDITIONS. 

REMARKS 

CLL/COZ/ 

3 

C 

<fol~f~2(B 

S'/m .tte. 

'yo /p-v kl 7

 V^/ 

a /A^ r cu Cc C° 

a.xi UO Go C$rsT"<J #'r*fa 

-£ 0.2 i 00 (rO 7 

z X D.l l Co (-0 

^ WaM'-z&l /v?V74 

ftV/4 ^ 

IOY7/t 

1 D.W. (tO ov £_ fort frHvk'-XA 1 0JX Co 00 

P mfflW-'&M I0-S5 A 

JC- o.ao &0 Ao 

T %itt*t'<M*) l0-*6 A 

ft x 0.90 &0 ao 

T To tofk+: *M X OM /JLO T PcftH-z/3} 

lfotrw**& 

THJOA 

iYlv/t 4 1 £>.« To /zo s 

(ll») ^ " 

±L •lotf 

I'/D P \ i/ o#> 00 /2.V 

(sign) 

Relinquished by (sign) 

? *• uaiwnm Dte/Timoe A 

3;/V73| r-SZf 

Received by (sign) DatefTime 

Date/Time Received by (sign) Date/Time 

Report to be sent (if different than customer information): 

NAME: -Sfyg 

Date/Time 

Method of Shipment (circle) 

US MAIL UPS FED. EX 

Received far Laboratory by (sh Date/Tjme 

ADDRESS: 

egx 

PERSONAL DELIVERY OTHER 

Laboratory Storage (circle): 

VOC 

STATE/ZIP . FAX ( )_ 

Customer to complete all ., use additional forms if needed Additional Remarks: 

mi.il/ r-r icrniiC O H co 

CO 
S.^rJ #ZSSffS3 *S 

CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY 

ASAP TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC. 

19701 SOUTH MILES ROAD, WARRENSVILLE HEIGHTS, OHIO 44128-4257 

TEL: (216) 663-0808, (800) 969-0808 FAX: (216) 663-0656 

COLLECTOR(S) NAMF(<i) prim n&lh V ftD \/f~f. 

COMPANY 

NAME <£/a$fTc Corp 

CUSTOMER INFORMATION 

BILLING 

ADDRESS 

"*1 

CONTACT NAME. 

fJ^n^t Boys 

c6LLECTOR(S) SIGNATURE(S) J{a 

TURN-AROUND (cirde)S. 24-hr 

PRIORITY SERVICE APPROVED BY: 

48-hr 72-hr O 

PARAMETER-SEE REVERSE 

CITY 

One Week ( ' Regular Regular. 

TCLP 

SITE LOCATION 

DATE LOGGED: J-MS5 1 VERBAL RESULTS DUE: CESPfrSON: ] 

ASAP# 

4 No. of 

CUSTOMER SAMPLE ( DATE / TIME SAMPLE CONIDENTIFICATION COLLECTED COLLECTED1

^ MATRIX TAINERS 

= * 

1 

fa. 

c£ 

* - . 

ss 

f IT \,'* I a* Of 

STATE/ZIP 

PHONE ( J if5--w 3 

FAX( )\_ v, — 

P.O ..... \ . No. . CSAMPLES WILL BE DISPOSED OF IN 

ACCORDANCE WITH ASAP'S 

TERMS & CONDITIONS. 

REMARKS 

^£ 2* k-1 -J.CA) 

l>nki\3>(t) 

\ 

x r + XL 

-a. 

M. Vftf^*6& S / 

11 BBafr roil<&f*k 7* Mi*tf •kwntof n -m^---> . 

7J5X ^ UC Vi \ 

s T jfefSw'-Js.'-. •.,/.'..:,•• • .•^•••Irin'Kyy- •'• 

c 

•^r; 

^. T 

-s 

Relinquished by (sign) 

Date/Time Received ^ (sign) . Date/Time 

Date/Time Received by (sign) Date/Time 

Report to be sent (if different than customer information) 

'

NAME.?/ j. 3fr*L s ^_ 

Dateffime 

Method of Shipment (circle) 

US MAIL UPS FED. EX. 

ReceivetLJor Laboratory bv (sis 

ADDRESS: | . 

PERSONAL DELIVERY •. OTHER 

S9°WAfy 

Laboratory Storage (circle): W- 1 / #2 VOC 

STATE/ZIP . FAX ( )_ 

Customer to complete all sh TTise additional forms if nittlciI Addlllimul Ki'marks: 
P.41 

%• 

G$-i^m{^M,_ 

SAMPLIN G DATA 

Date visited: 3-»-9-

Location 

1/ •/• 

tm- * i •—i ^ i Location: W^7 

Air Contaminant 

Hours of Shift Involved: 

Sampling Technique: 

Lunch: _ 

PUm P # --mi--. _ 

Sample 

Qu*lbJkf kl 

Name: ' /[O^J 

7 '/)JMI\J? 

MJ£L 

Air Contaminant: 

Flow rate -4f,&&L/*n 

nc^-1 

H 1i)tf 

Hours of Shift Involved: 

Sampling Technique 

Lunch: 

Solution . 

Needed Volume - _lf^fj^hjf^f3] Pump* 

S.. 

CC/Stroke »• \ H 

MultiplierSample # 

{lfUudl-l 

Name: 

' Flowrate- a,jL2*7^T 

Filter rC/AT/nJ 

Solution LJrtdKi*twX 

Needed Volume -iMLa^Jlh 

,r(P) MultiplierOperation: 

f\otai Liters 

^[_j^^-^^%^. ^ 4* a Stain. 

^S^-mm-m-l-mm . 

sfUhJ Location: 

Air Contaminant 

Hours of Shift Involved: 

Sampling Technique: 

Lunch: 

Flnw ratA - 0-22-2 y f * Sai 

* Filter JChsujJ cjr/huJr\ ... 

Needed Volume-. 

CC/Stroke 

MultiplierJO £- /»~ 

r<\L4s> J3 

Pump # SS 

Sample #rj2s£2Z 

Ahp*^t£ 

Hours of Shift Involved: — j \ s P ^--- , 

impling Technique: Flow rate " *V jy2 , S 

Lunch: . —*_ Filter-Ci&Z&afL. 

afyj^Jts Kv^a^V Solution -C£g£2^J

Pump # r+~ Needed Volume -/PPftW ^ 

gamp i 0 trlUSy/ -£m) CC/Stroke- _ 

(PJ MultiplierName: . 

Operation 

Tota! LiterssOff r* un ^-Q** 

x —*= ? _ ho**! 

(0 -Vl 

Operation: . 

Total Liters 

Location: (frtCtyf 

^Q.^yl^x 

ft Mm'A5<3£>Jm*BAi a dj-lS-£'K-i? r Contaminant 

Hours of Shift Involved: 

Sampling Technique: 

Lunch 

JS 

Flow rate • fa7

**-

Pump * ^ 

Filter -£¥U,ffc 

Solution 

Needed Volume 

s» 

Location 

Air Contaminant: 

Hours of Shift Involved: fi/ 7 , 

Sampling Technique: Finw ratP - U^Xi^ 

Lunch: _ _ ^ _ FilterSample * ChijM^-fe) CC/Stroke -

/) ^jfiy Multiplier -

Q^^> -iL^U^-^ Solution- C^pH * 

eeded Volume -/flft."ffi /ti 

CC/Stroke - . 

Multiplier . 

Pump # 

Samples JM^A UfffflJlhnr 

Name: 

Operation: . 

Total Liters 

^ ^ ^ *? Name: _J_ 

$ > P**j»*dLi 

j'.fC 

Operation: . 

Total Liters 2* U yo j&-l 

4-0