alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV 

House Calendar No. 28 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 230 

[Report No. 115–61] 

Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (S.J. Res. 34) providing 

for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States 

Code, of the rule submitted by the Federal Communications Commission 

relating to ‘‘Protecting the Privacy of Customers of Broadband and 

Other Telecommunications Services’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 27, 2017 

Mr. BURGESS, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (S.J. Res. 

34) providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted 

by the Federal Communications Commission relating to 

‘‘Protecting the Privacy of Customers of Broadband and 

Other Telecommunications Services’’. 

1 Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it 

2 shall be in order to consider in the House the joint resolu3 tion (S.J. Res. 34) providing for congressional disapproval 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 230 RH 

1 under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule 

2 submitted by the Federal Communications Commission re3 lating to ‘‘Protecting the Privacy of Customers of 

4 Broadband and Other Telecommunications Services’’. All 

5 points of order against consideration of the joint resolu6 tion are waived. The joint resolution shall be considered 

7 as read. All points of order against provisions in the joint 

8 resolution are waived. The previous question shall be con9 sidered as ordered on the joint resolution and on any 

10 amendment thereto to final passage without intervening 

11 motion except: (1) one hour of debate equally divided and 

12 controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of 

13 the Committee on Energy and Commerce; and (2) one mo14 tion to commit. 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS

asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
House Calendar No. 28 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 230 

[Report No. 115–61] 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the joint resolution 

and Other Telecommunications Services’’. tecting the Privacy of Customers of Broadband Communications Commission relating to ‘‘ProStates Code, of the rule submitted by the Federal approval under chapter 8 of title 5, United (S.J. Res. 34) providing for congressional disMARCH 27, 2017 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### § 200.451 Losses on other awards or contracts.

Any excess of costs over income under any other award or contract of any nature is unallowable. This includes, but is not limited to, the non-Federal entity's contributed portion by reason of cost-sharing agreements or any under-recoveries through negotiation of flat amounts for indirect (F&A) costs. Also, any excess of costs over authorized funding levels transferred from any award or contract to another award or contract is unallowable. All losses are not allowable indirect (F&A) costs and are required to be included in the appropriate indirect cost rate base for allocation of indirect costs.
§ 1014.7 Referral to Department of Justice. ( a ) When Department of Justice approval or consultation is required under § 1014.6, the referral or request shall be transmitted to the Department of Justice by the General Counsel or designee.
( b ) When a designee of the General Counsel is processing a claim requiring consultation with, or approval of, either the DOE General Counsel or the Department of Justice, the referral or request shall be sent to the General Counsel in writing and shall contain: ( 1 ) A short and concise statement of the facts and of the reasons for the referral or request,
( 2 ) Copies of relevant portions of the claim file, and
( 3 ) A statement of recommendations or views.
225 So.2d 6

#### STATE ex rel. Alvin ALLEN v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 49969.

July 21, 1969.

In re: Alvin Allen applying for writ of habeas corpus.

The application is denied. The showing made does not warrant the exercise of our supervisory or original jurisdiction in this matter.
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D19-1401

_____________________________

JASON LONGORIA,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Washington County.

Timothy Register, Judge.

September 18, 2019

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

LEWIS, OSTERHAUS, and KELSEY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Jason Longoria, pro se, Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
H. Res. 633

In the House of Representatives, U.S., 

December 19 (legislative day, December 18), 2005.

Whereas Helen Sewell, the proprietor of the concession stand 

in the Republican Cloak Room of the House of Representatives, through her long and devoted service to the 

House and its Members, has become a House institution 

in the minds and hearts of House Members; 

Whereas Helen Sewell has worked at the counter in the Cloak 

Room since she was a teenager in the 1930’s; 

Whereas Helen Sewell’s service to the House of Representatives is a continuation of a family tradition, as her father 

began working in the Cloak Room 87 years ago; 

Whereas Helen Sewell, as a result of her almost seven decades of service, has been present for some of the defining 

events in the Nation’s history and the House’s history, 

including the attack by Puerto Rican nationalists on 

March 1, 1954; 

Whereas Helen Sewell has established personal relationships 

with many of the 20th century’s most important Americans, including Presidents Ford, Nixon, and George 

H.W. Bush; 

Whereas Helen Sewell’s dedication to her work, and her careful attention to Members of the House, has provided both 
2

•HRES 633 EH 

nourishment and friendship to Members of the House 

since the days of the Great Depression; 

Whereas Helen Sewell has demonstrated extraordinary 

strength and endurance by working long and difficult 

hours past her 80th year; 

Whereas Helen Sewell received the 1983 John W. McCormick 

Award of Excellence for her service to the Congress; 

Whereas all who have served as Members in the United 

States House of Representatives, and who have had occasion to meet Helen Sewell, believe that her service to the 

House is a matter of historical importance and should be 

commemorated; and 

Whereas Helen Sewell will retire officially from the House of 

Representatives on December 31, 2005: Now, therefore, 

be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives honors 

Helen Sewell on the occasion of her retirement and expresses 

its gratitude for her many years of service. 

Attest:

Clerk.
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
You havereached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC)Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC.Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suite ofcataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications.  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the eventthat publications are no longer available from the original publishing agencysite. (Historical purposes)
**Title:****Aviationsystem indicators: annual report.**** 
SuDocNumber:TD4.76:, TD 4.2:
ItemNumber:0982-L-09,0431-C-08
CGPsystem Number:000562454
 
1996
1998
 
 **
#### FULTON, Respondent, v. RICHMOND COUNTY SOCIETY FOR PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO CHILDREN, Appellant, et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

January 22, 1915.)

Action by Edward J. Fulton against the Richmond County Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children, impleaded with others.

PER CURIAM.

Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals -granted, question certified, and order signed.

JENKS, P. J., takes no part.
#### § 2900.6 Advance payment.

In the DOL, except as authorized under 2 CFR 200.208, the non-Federal entity must be paid in advance (see 2 CFR 200.305(b)(1)).

[86 FR 22108, Apr. 27, 2021]
#### § 1128.2 Applicability of this part.

The types of awards and entities to which this part and other parts in this subchapter apply are described in the subchapter overview at 2 CFR 1126.2.
No. 76-5140.

#### Burko *v.*Maryland.

Ct. Sp. App. Md. Certiorari denied...
usbank

All of us serving you

**AnnualStatement of Compliance UBS-BarclaysCommercial Mortgage Trust 2013-C6**

 Re: 

ThePooling and Servicing Agreement (the "Agreement") dated as of April 1,2013 entered into by Barclays Commercial Mortgage Securities LLC, as depositor, MidlandLoan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, as master servicer, RialtoCapital Advisors, LLC, as special servicer, Park Bridge Lender Services LLC, as operatingadvisor, and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee, certificate administrator, payingagent and custodian 

           I,Nancie J. Arvin, a Senior Vice President of U.S. Bank NationalAssociation, as Certificate Administratorhereby certify that:             (1) A review of the activities of theCertificate Administrator duringthe year ended December 31, 2013 (the "Reporting Period) and of the performance of the CertificateAdministrator under the Agreement has been made under my supervision; and            (2) To the best of my knowledge, basedon such review, the CertificateAdministrator has fulfilled its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughoutthe Reporting Period.

          Capitalized terms used but not defined herein have the meanings setforth in the Agreement. 

Date:March 14, 2014 

 U.S.Bank National Association as Certificate Administrator By: /s/ Nancie J. Arvin       Nancie J. Arvin        Senior VicePresident
#### J. J. J. Bar & Restaurant Inc., Petitioner, v. State Liquor Authority et al., Respondents.

Motion by petitioner to stay respondents from interfering with the operation of its business, etc., pending determination of this proceeding pursuant to article 78 of the CPLR. Motion denied and stay heretofore granted in the order to show cause dated March 2, 1970 vacated. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Munder, Martuscello, Brennan and Benjamin, JJ., concur.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 94-1783

SEBASTIAN C. SISTI,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER AND SMITH,

INCORPORATED; JOSEPH BELFIORE; GEORGE T.

BASKERVILLE, III; ARTHUR SOBEL; MICHAEL S.

DZIKOWSKI; WILLIAM A. SCHREYER; DANIEL P.

TULLY,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert R. Merhige, Jr., Senior

District Judge. (CA-94-158)

Submitted: February 7, 1996 Decided: February 14, 1996

Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Frank George Uvanni, CHALKLEY & WITMEYER, Ashland, Virginia, for

Appellant. James E. Farnham, Edward Joseph Fuhr, HUNTON &

WILLIAMS, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Sebastian C. Sisti appeals from the district court's order

granting the Defendants' motion to dismiss Sisti's civil complaint

on res judicata grounds. Finding no error, we affirm.

The parties in the current action are identical to those in

Sisti's earlier federal suit; the individual Defendants in this

action are employees or officers of the corporate DefendantCa

Defendant in both the earlier federal suit and this action. See

Nash County Bd. of Educ. v. Biltmore Co., 640 F.2d 484, 493-94 (4th

Cir.), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 878 (1981). There is identity of the

causes of action between this suit and the former one. Sisti's attempt to raise the same claims under a different legal theory does

not circumvent the res judicata bar. See Harnett v. Billman, 800

F.2d 1308, 1314 (4th Cir. 1986), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 932 (1987).

And the judgment in the prior action was a judgment on the merits.

Therefore, the district court properly found the current action

barred by the principles of res judicata. See Keith v. Aldridge,

900 F.2d 736, 739-40 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 900 (1990).

Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order. We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed April 10, 2019. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearin g.

________________

No. 3D18-1949 Lower Tribunal No. 13-4135

________________



### Norman Lainez, Appellant,

vs.



### The State of Florida, Appellee.

An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2 ) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Spencer J. Multack, Judge.

Norman Lainez, in proper person.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Magaly Rodriguez, Assistan t Attorney General, for appellee.

Before FERNANDEZ, SCALES, and LINDSEY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.2 We affirm and write only to commend the trial judge on his tho rough and

detailed order denying defendant’s motion for post-conviction r elief entered below.

Affirmed.
IV 

House Calendar No. 198 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1181 

[Report No. 115–1085] 

Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on Rules, and 

providing for consideration of motions to suspend the rules. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 19, 2018 

Mr. SESSIONS, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

RESOLUTION 

Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with 

respect to consideration of certain resolutions reported 

from the Committee on Rules, and providing for consideration of motions to suspend the rules. 

1 Resolved, That the requirement of clause 6(a) of rule 

2 XIII for a two-thirds vote to consider a report from the 

3 Committee on Rules on the same day it is presented to 

4 the House is waived with respect to any resolution re5 ported through the legislative day of December 24, 2018. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1181 RH 

1 SEC. 2. It shall be in order at any time through the 

2 calendar day of December 23, 2018, for the Speaker to 

3 entertain motions that the House suspend the rules as 

4 though under clause 1 of rule XV. The Speaker or his 

5 designee shall consult with the Minority Leader or her des6 ignee on the designation of any matter for consideration 

7 pursuant to this section. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
House Calendar No. 198 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1181 

[Report No. 115–1085] 

RESOLUTION 

Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII 

the rules. providing for consideration of motions to suspend tions reported from the Committee on Rules, and with respect to consideration of certain resoluDECEMBER 19, 2018 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
#### § 200.317 Procurements by states.

When procuring property and services under a Federal award, a State must follow the same policies and procedures it uses for procurements from its non-Federal funds. The State will comply with §§ 200.321, 200.322, and 200.323 and ensure that every purchase order or other contract includes any clauses required by § 200.327. All other non-Federal entities, including subrecipients of a State, must follow the procurement standards in §§ 200.318 through 200.327.
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications.

 

 

I, Helaine M. Kaplan, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filedin respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of the COMM 2013-CCRE6 Mortgage Trust (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

 

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information requiredto be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report underItem 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligationsunder the servicing agreements in all material respects; and

 

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backedsecurities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities requiredto be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been includedas an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in suchreports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to meby the following unaffiliated parties:

 

Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, Midland Loan Services, a Divisionof PNC Bank, National Association, as Special Servicer, U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee prior to October 17, 2022, U.S. BankTrust Company, National Association, as Trustee on and after October 17, 2022, Park Bridge Lender Services LLC, as Operating Advisor,and CoreLogic Solutions, LLC, as Servicing Function Participant.

 

 

 

Dated:March 17, 2023

 

 

/s/ Helaine M. Kaplan

 

 

Helaine M. Kaplan

President

(senior officer in charge of securitizationof the depositor)
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-20833 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus ELISEO SAUCEDO-VASQUEZ, also known as Cuauthtemoc Saucedo-Vasquez, also known as Vincent Bello, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-02-CR-576-ALL

-------------------- Before BARKSDALE, DeMOSS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Eliseo Saucedo-Vasquez (Saucedo) appeals his sentence following his guilty-plea conviction for aiding and abetting the transportation of illegal aliens within the United States for commercial advantage and private financial gain, and causing an alien’s death, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(1) and 18 U.S.C. § 2. He argues that the district court erred in increasing his offense level by eight levels pursuant to U.S.S.G. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## F I L E D June 22, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III ClerkNo. 03-20833 -2- § 2L1.1(b)(6)(4) because the district court failed to make a finding that he acted recklessly in creating a threat of serious bodily injury or death. Section 2L1.1(b)(6) of the Sentencing Guidelines provides, “If any person died or sustained bodily injury, increase the offense level according to the seriousness of the injury.” Section 2L1.1(b)(5) provides for a sentence enhancement “[i]f the offense involved intentionally or recklessly creating a substantial risk of death or serious bodily injury to another person.” That U.S.S.G. § 2L1.1(b)(6) does not specify reckless conduct as a requirement for the enhancement, while U.S.S.G. § 2L1.1(b)(5) specifies it, is a clear indication that reckless conduct is not necessary for an increase under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.1(b)(6). See United States v. Garcia-Guerrero , 313 F.3d 892, 895 (5th Cir. 2002). Because Saucedo has failed to demonstrate any error, plain or otherwise, in the district court’s application of the U.S.S.G. § 2L1.1(b)(6)(4) enhancement, the district court’s judgment is
AFFIRMED.
222 So.2d 68

#### Simuel GUIDRY v. SEACOAST PRODUCTS, INC., et al.

No. 49830.

May 9, 1969.

In re: Seacoast Products, Inc., and United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Vermilion. 220 So.2d 570.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal the result is correct.
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of SITI-Sites.com, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), We,
Lawrence M. Powers, Chief Executive Officer and Toni Ann Tantillo, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


                                        /s/ Lawrence M. Powers
                                        ----------------------
                                        Lawrence M. Powers
                                        Chief Executive Officer


                                        /s/ Toni Ann Tantillo
                                        ----------------------
                                        Toni Ann Tantillo
                                        Chief Financial Officer

August 15, 2005


                                       14
222 So.2d 64

#### James E. BUSENBARRICK, individually and for his minor son, David Busenbarrick v. UNITED SERVICES AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION et al.

No. 49767.

May 9, 1969.

In re: James E. Busenbarrick, individually and for his minor son, David Busenbarrick applying for certiorari or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, Parish of Caddo. 219 So.2d 780.

Writ refused. Under the facts found by the Court of Appeal there is no error of law in the judgment.