alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1120.500 Scope of administrative requirements. The administrative requirements in an award are post-award and after-the-award requirements for recipients in the following subject matter areas: ( a ) Financial and program management, to include financial management system standards, payment, allowable costs, program and budget revisions, audits, cost sharing or matching, and program income.
( b ) Property administration, to include title vesting, property management system standards, and use and disposition of tangible and intangible property.
( c ) Recipient procurement procedures.
( d ) Financial, programmatic, property, and other reporting.
( e ) Records retention and access, remedies, claims and disputes, and closeout.
H. Res. 854

In the House of Representatives, U.S., 

June 27, 2006.

Whereas the President of the United States has issued a 

proclamation designating the month of June 2006 as National Homeownership Month; 

Whereas the national homeownership rate in the United 

States has reached a record high of almost 70 percent 

and more than half of all minority families are homeowners; 

Whereas the people of the United States are one of the besthoused populations in the world; 

Whereas owning a home is a fundamental part of the American dream and is the largest personal investment many 

families will ever make; 

Whereas homeownership provides economic security for homeowners by aiding them in building wealth over time and 

strengthens communities through a greater stake among 

homeowners in local schools, civic organizations, and 

churches; 

Whereas creating affordable homeownership opportunities requires the commitment and cooperation of the private, 

public, and nonprofit sectors, including the Federal Government and State and local governments; and 
2

•HRES 854 EH 

Whereas the current laws of the United States, such as the 

American Dream Downpayment Act, encourage homeownership and should continue to do so in the future: 

Now, therefore, be it

Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

(1) fully supports the goals and ideals of National 

Homeownership Month; and 

(2) recognizes the importance of homeownership in 

building strong communities and families.

Attest: 

Clerk.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. SS.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection  with the quarterly  report of AccuPoll  Holding Corp. on
Form 10-Q/A for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof,  I, Dennis Vadura,  chief executive
officer of the registrant,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss.1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1. The report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The  information  contained in the report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
registrant.

Date: June 7, 2004

Signed

/S/ Dennis Vadura
----------------------------------------------
Dennis Vadura
CEO AccuPoll Holding Corp.

A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
required  by  Section  906,  has been  provided  to the  registrant  and will be
retained  by the  registrant  and  furnished  to  the  Securities  and  Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Charles Holloman, Appellant.

[813 NYS2d 907]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Dora Irizarry, J., at hearing and plea; Arlene Silverman, J, at sentence), rendered September 9, 2004, convicting defendant of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 4x/2 to 9 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s valid waiver of his right to appeal forecloses review of his suppression claim *(see People v Lopez,*6 NY3d 248, 256-257 [2006]). Were we to find that defendant did not make a valid waiver, we would, in any event, reject his suppression arguments. Concur—Tom, J.P., Saxe, Nardelli, Gonzalez and Catterson, JJ.
**EXHIBIT
31.1**
 
 **CERTIFICATIONS**
 
 
 I, Emil
H. Soika, President and Chief Executive Officer of Criticare Systems, Inc.,
certify that:
 
 1.  I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Criticare Systems,
Inc.;
 
 2.  Based on
my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
 3.  Based on
my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
periods presented in this report;
 
 4.  The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 
 (a)  designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;
 
 (b)  evaluated the
effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and
 
 (c)  disclosed
in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that
has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
 
 5.  The registrant's other
certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of
internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the
audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):
  
  
 (a)  all
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and
 
 (b)  any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting.
 
 Date:
February 11 ,
2005
  /s/
Emil H.
Soika
 Emil H.
Soika
 President
and Chief Executive Officer
   2
###### Editorial Note on Part 4

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 4 appear at 77 FR 39904, July 6, 2012.

#### § 4.31 Cooperation and assistance.

The responsible NRC official shall to the fullest extent practicable seek the cooperation of recipients in obtaining compliance with this subpart and shall provide assistance and guidance to recipients to help them comply voluntarily with this subpart.
#### SMITH, Appellant, v. HEDGES, Respondent (two cases).

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

November 13, 1914.)

Actions by S. Dimon Smith against Dayton Hedges.

No opinion. Judgment and order reversed, and new trial granted, costs to abide the event, on the ground that the verdict is contrary to the evidence.
###### Editorial Note on Part 70

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 70 appear at 81 FR 86910, Dec. 2, 2016.

#### § 70.60 Applicability.

The regulations in § 70.61 through § 70.76 apply, in addition to other applicable Commission regulations, to each applicant or licensee that is or plans to be authorized to possess greater than a critical mass of special nuclear material, and engaged in enriched uranium processing, fabrication of uranium fuel or fuel assemblies, uranium enrichment, enriched uranium hexafluoride conversion, plutonium processing, fabrication of mixed-oxide fuel or fuel assemblies, scrap recovery of special nuclear material, or any other activity that the Commission determines could significantly affect public health and safety. The regulations in § 70.61 through § 70.76 do not apply to decommissioning activities performed pursuant to other applicable Commission regulations including § 70.25 and § 70.38 of this part. Also, the regulations in § 70.61 through § 70.76 do not apply to activities that are certified by the Commission pursuant to part 76 of this chapter or licensed by the Commission pursuant to other parts of this chapter. Unless specifically addressed in § 70.61 through § 70.76, implementation by current licensees of the Subpart H requirements shall be completed no later than the time of the ISA Summary submittal required in § 70.62(c)(3)(ii).
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY,

Appellant,

v.

PRECISION DIAGNOSTIC, INC., a/a/o LESDIE CONNER,

Appellee.

No. 4D21-178

[April 19, 2023]

Appeal from the County Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Robert W. Lee, Judge; L.T. Case No. 15-12614 COCE (53) 

and 17-6927 CACE (AP).

Nancy A. Copperthwaite and Marcy Levine Aldrich of Akerman LLP, 

Miami, for appellant.

David M. Caldevilla of de la Parte & Gilbert, P.A., Tampa, and 

Theophilos Poulopoulos and Paul G. Kluck of The Schiller Kessler Group, 

PLC, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

This appeal arises out of a small claims suit brought by Precision 

Diagnostic, Inc., as assignee of Lesdie Conner (“the Provider”), against 

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (“the Insurer”), 

alleging that the Insurer did not pay the full amount owed under the policy. 

In a joint pre-trial stipulation, the parties agreed that “[t]he main issue for 

the trier of fact is whether the language of State Farm’s 9810A policy, 

which is the applicable policy in relation to this claim, permits State Farm 

to limit reimbursement pursuant to the Schedule of Maximum Charges.” 

Both parties moved for summary judgment. The arguments turned on 

differing interpretations of the policy language, a matter which has since 

been put to rest by the Florida Supreme Court. See MRI Assocs. of Tampa, 

Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 334 So. 3d 577 (Fla. 2021). The trial 

court entered summary judgment for the Provider. Based on MRI 

Associates of Tampa, we reverse.
2

The Provider argues that there are remaining disputed factual issues 

related to the contents of the policy at the time of issuance or renewal that 

preclude summary judgment. Based on stipulations the parties entered 

below, we reject the argument. We reverse the summary judgment and 

remand for the trial court to enter summary judgment in favor of the 

Insurer. See Progressive Am. Ins. Co. v. Back on Track, LLC, 342 So. 3d 

779, 793 (Fla. 2d DCA 2022). 

Reversed and remanded with instructions.

MAY, CIKLIN and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
§ 1128.100 Purpose of FMS Article I. FMS Article I specifies standards for recipients' financial management systems. It thereby implements OMB guidance in: ( a ) 2 CFR 200.302, 200.303, and 200.328; and
( b ) 2 CFR 200.301 and 200.328, as they relate to associations between financial data and performance accomplishments and reporting.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                      35,161,475
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,957,247
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,406,606
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            46,365,728
<PP&E>                                     210,682,193
<DEPRECIATION>                              47,749,162
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             265,547,316
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       22,884,701
<BONDS>                                    197,589,248
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                 17,521,385
<COMMON>                                        61,944
<OTHER-SE>                                  51,513,504
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               265,547,316
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            68,819,729
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               15,739,774
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            10,404,652
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           6,822,262
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             35,853,041
<INCOME-TAX>                                12,219,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         23,634,041
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                23,634,041
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     3.76
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
30.201-5 Waiver.

(a)(1)(B) Waiver requests for individual procurements shall be submitted to the DLA Acquisition

Contract and Pricing Compliance Division for coordination with the DLA Acquisition Director prior to

submission to DPC for approval. (e) The DLA Acquisition Compliance, Policy and Pricing Division

prepares the annual report on CAS waivers for approval by the Senior Procurement Executive and

submits the report to DPC.

Parent topic: SUBPART 30.2 – CAS PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS
§ 95.41 External receipt and dispatch records. Each licensee, certificate holder or other person possessing classified information shall maintain a record that reflects: ( a ) The date of the material;
( b ) The date of receipt or dispatch;
( c ) The classification;
( d ) An unclassified description of the material; and
( e ) The identity of the sender from which the material was received or recipient to which the material was dispatched. receipt and dispatch records must be retained for 2 years.
[62 FR 17697, Apr. 11, 1997]
Order entered November 3, 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas** No. 05 - 14 - 00615 - CV MARK SCHWARZ, NEWCAS TLE MANAGEMENT, L.P. , ET AL., Appellant s V. STEVEN J. PULLY, Appellee On Appeal from the 298th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC - 11 - 0064 - H 

### O RDER W e GRANT appellants’ October 31, 2014 motion for extension of time to file reply brief and ORDER the brief be filed no later than December 17, 2014

. No further extensions will be granted abse nt exigent circumstances.

/s/ ADA BROWN JUSTICE
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998             JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998              JUL-1-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998             MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                       2,313,387               2,313,387
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                7,797,984               7,797,984
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (453,000)               (453,000)
<INVENTORY>                                  7,024,240               7,024,240
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            17,328,823              17,328,823
<PP&E>                                      11,274,349              11,274,349
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,382,904               4,382,904
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              24,357,730              24,357,730
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,035,354               4,035,354
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                       334,086                 334,086
<OTHER-SE>                                  16,795,353              16,795,353
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                24,357,730              24,357,730
<SALES>                                      6,278,961              20,960,466
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,278,961              20,960,466
<CGS>                                        3,359,896              11,263,024
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,208,691              19,882,027
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                51,269                 755,382
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                24,000                 175,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              79,617                 718,373
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 19,001                 323,057
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             19,001                 323,057
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                    19,001                 323,057
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .00                     .04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .00                     .04
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2



STRATEX NETWORKS, INC.



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the periodic report of Stratex Networks, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Carl A. Thomsen, Chief Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for
purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:



(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and



(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in
typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed,
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.



|                     |  |                                       
|-------------------- |  | --------------------------------------
|Date: August 9, 2005 |  | /s/ Carl A. Thomsen                   
|                     |  | Carl A. Thomsen                       
|                     |  | Chief Financial and Accounting Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 83 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 83

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that India should 
     be a permanent member of the United Nations Security Council.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 9, 2005

 Mr. Pallone submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                the Committee on International Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that India should 
     be a permanent member of the United Nations Security Council.

    Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives that 
India should be a permanent member of the United Nations Security 
Council.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 2424.220 What contracts and subcontracts, in addition to those listed in 2 CFR 180.220, are covered transactions?

In addition to the contracts covered under 2 CFR 180.220(b) of the OMB guidance, this part applies to any contract, regardless of tier, that is awarded by a contractor, subcontractor, supplier, consultant, or its agent or representative in any transaction, if the contract is to be funded or provided by HUD under a covered nonprocurement transaction and the amount of the contract is expected to equal or exceed $25,000. This extends the coverage of the HUD nonprocurement suspension and debarment requirements to all lower tiers of subcontracts under covered nonprocurement transactions, as permitted under the OMB guidance at 2 CFR 180.220(c) (see optional lower-tier coverage in the figure in the appendix to 2 CFR part 180).
#### RAKOV, Respondent, v. BANKERS' LIFE INS. CO. OF NEW YORK, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

May 29, 1914.)

Action by Herman Rakov against the Bankers' Life Insurance Company of New York.

PER CURIAM.

The Justices qualified to sit in this appeal being equally divided and unable to render a decision therein, the same is transferred to the Appellate Division, Third Department, to be there heard and determined, pursuant to section 231 of the Code of Civil Procedure. See, also, 159 App. Div. 933, 144 N. Y. Supp. 1141.

MERRELL, J., not sitting.
#### Robert Foote, Respondent, v Betty A. Foote, Appellant.

a divorce action, defendant appeals, on the ground of inadequacy, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered July 27, 1979, as awarded her counsel fees and disbursements in the sum of $1,500. Judgment modified, on the facts, by increasing the award of counsel fees and disbursements to $2,083.93. As so modified, judgment affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements. Although the record before this court does not support defendant’s request for more than $11,000 in legal fees, it would appear that the sum of $1,500 awarded by Special Term is insufficient to cover both legal fees and disbursements. Consequently, an additional reimbursement for disbursements is required. Mollen, P. J., Hopkins, Mangano and Cohalan, JJ., concur.
#### §§ 1402.415-1402.499 [Reserved]