alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 75 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 75

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives regarding sexually 
          exploited and trafficked girls in the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 31, 2017

 Ms. DeLauro (for herself, Mr. Smith of Washington, Ms. Meng, Ms. Judy 
  Chu of California, Ms. Roybal-Allard, Ms. Moore, Ms. Bordallo, Ms. 
  Schakowsky, Mr. Tonko, Mr. Price of North Carolina, Mr. Pocan, Ms. 
 Jackson Lee, Mr. Cohen, and Ms. Brownley of California) submitted the 
   following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the 
                               Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives regarding sexually 
          exploited and trafficked girls in the United States.

Whereas most girls subjected to commercial sexual exploitation and trafficking 
        come from a broken child welfare system or are runaway youth that were 
        subsequently preyed upon by exploiters and traffickers;
Whereas it is important to provide education for family, friends, and neighbors 
        to understand that these girls are victims;
Whereas survivors of domestic trafficking need support in their efforts to raise 
        awareness on identifying trafficked girls and the systems of support 
        that such girls require to heal from the complex trauma of sexual 
        violence and exploitation;
Whereas the same protections and supports available to victims of child abuse 
        should be extended to child victims of trafficking; and
Whereas exploited and trafficked girls are not ``bad girls'' or ``child 
        prostitutes'', but are victims of systemized rape who need the same 
        legal supports and protections other rape victims are afforded: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives supports efforts to--
            (1) provide protections and supports for sexually exploited 
        and trafficked girls in the United States; and
            (2) create criminal or civil penalties for anyone who buys 
        or sells a child through a system of child trafficking.
                                 <all>
```
227 So.2d 590

#### Michael L. HYATT v. HARTFORD ACCIDENT AND INDEMNITY COMPANY et al.

No. 50087.

Nov. 10, 1969.

In re: Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company applying for certiorari or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Vernon. 225 So.2d 102.

Writ refused. The judgment is correct.
**Exhibit 32.2**
WESTCORP
CERTIFICATION OF CFO
In connection with the Quarterly Report of Westcorp (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the periodending March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, to the best ofhis knowledge and belief and pursuant to 18 U.S.C., Chapter 63, Section 1350, as adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes–Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
The foregoing Certification is furnished solely for purposes of complying with the provisions ofSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and is not intended to be used for any other purpose.
**WESTCORP** /s/ mark k. olsonMark K. OlsonVice President, Controller andInterim Chief Financial Officer
Date: May 6, 2005
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Millennium Challenge Corporation

          - [MCC FR 10-16]

# AGENCY:

Millennium Challenge Corporation.

# TIME AND DATE: 

10 a.m. to 12 p.m., Wednesday, January 5, 2011.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Information on the meeting may be obtained from Melvin Williams, Jr., Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary via e-mail at                         *Corporatesecretary@mcc.gov*                         or by telephone at (202) 521-3600.                    

## Background

                        On November 23, 2010, the Millennium Challenge Corporation published a notice in the                         **Federal Register**                         pursuant to the Government in the Sunshine Act (5 U.S.C. 552b) stating that the MCC Board of Directors would hold a meeting December 15, 2010. (Volume 75, Number 225, page 71465) This meeting is now being moved to January 5, 2011. All other details regarding the place, status, and matters to be considered remain the same.                    

## Amendment

The time and date of the meeting are amended to read: 10 a.m. to 12 p.m., Wednesday, January 5, 2011

Dated: December 20, 2010.

Melvin F. Williams, Jr.,

VP/General Counsel and Corporate Secretary, Millennium Challenge Corporation.

[FR Doc. 2010-32352 Filed 12-20-10; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 9211-03-P
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-20477

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

FLOYD COLEMAN,

Defendant-Appellant.

 

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Southern District of Texas

(H-96-CV-1009)

 

June 17, 1998

Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Federal prisoner Floyd Coleman petitions this court for a

certificate of appealability (COA) from the district court’s denial

of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. Coleman filed this motion on March

25, 1996, prior to the effective date of the Antiterrorism and

Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (AEDPA). Accordingly, because

the AEDPA is inapplicable here, Coleman need obtain neither a COA,

see United States v. Carter, 117 F.3d 262, 264 (5th Cir. 1997), nor
2

a certificate of probable cause (CPC), see United States v. Rocha,

109 F.3d 225, 228 (5th Cir. 1997). Coleman’s motion for a COA is

therefore DENIED as unnecessary.

On October 25, 1996, the district court denied Coleman’s §

2255 motion. Coleman had 60 days to notice an appeal from this

denial. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a). On March 5, 1997, Coleman moved

for an out-of-time appeal from this denial, citing excusable

neglect as grounds for his motion. The district court denied

Coleman an out-of-time appeal, for he failed to file his motion for

an out-of-time appeal within 30 days from the expiration of the

time allotted for an appeal, as provided by Fed. R. App. P.

4(a)(5). In short, Coleman had 90 days from October 25, 1996, to

request an out-of-time appeal. Because he is a prisoner, we treat

the date Coleman deposited his motion in the prison mail system --

February 27, 1997 -- as the date he filed a motion for an out-oftime appeal. See Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266 (1988). Even so,

his filing on February 27 was more than 90 days from the date that

the district court initially denied him § 2255 relief. The

district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Coleman

leave to file an appeal out-of-time. See Latham v. Wells Fargo

Bank, N.A., 987 F.2d 1199, 1202 (5th Cir. 1993).

AFFIRMED.
#### EASTERN ADVERTISING CO., Respondent, v. MORRIS PARK ESTATES, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

December 18, 1914.)

Action by the Eastern Advertising Company against the Morris Park Estates. Sullivan & Cromwell, of New York City, for appellant. H. B. Corey, of New York City, for respondent.

No opinion. Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Order filed.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 625 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 625

  Providing that the House of Representatives should consider policy 
            options regarding United States policy in Iraq.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 16, 2005

 Mr. Capuano submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                the Committee on International Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Providing that the House of Representatives should consider policy 
            options regarding United States policy in Iraq.

    Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives that 
the House should consider policy options regarding United States policy 
in Iraq.
                                 <all>
```
## Proposal to Provide Essential Air Service at

Fort Leonard Wood, Missouri

Docket DOT

- OST

- 1996

- 1167

August 13, 2014

Direct Inquiries Regarding this Proposal to:

Shane Storz, CEO

Air Choice One Airlines

12300 Old Tesson Road, Suite 200 F, Saint Louis, MO 63128

Phone: (866) 435

- 9847 Fax : (314) 843

- 8527 E

- mail: shane@airchoiceone.com



# Multi

- Aero Inc.

d/b/a

Air Choice One

# Look At Us Grow!

By working hard to deliver on common goals Air Choice One

demonstrates our commitment to our EAS communities everyday.

That commitment has been recognized by our community partners.

Burlington, IA 4 Year Contract Extension

Decatur, IL 4 Year Contract Extension

Jonesboro, AR 4 Year Contract Extension

Ironwood, MI New Service As Of July 7, 2014

*Mason City, Iowa Community Recommendation

Pending DOT Final Selection

**Fort Dodge, Iowa Community Recommendation

Pending DOT Final Selection

08/13/14Air Choice One reinvests in our served communities and will grow ridership

• TRADITIONAL MEDIA

• Radio

- Talk Shows/Commercials

• TV Commercials and Event Coverage

• Print

- Newspaper/Magazines

• Billboards

• Web Based

– E

- Blasts

– Monthly E

- Mail Promotions

– City Representation on Our Website

• SOCIAL MEDIA

• Twitter, Facebook, Linked In

• INTERACTIVE MEDIA

• Contests

• You Tube/Videos

• EVENTS AND SPONSORSHIPS

• Charitable Support to Resident Organizations and Local Chapters of National Non

- Profit Organizations

• Business/Community Support through Golf Tournaments, Business Luncheons, Air Shows, etc.



# Market Growth Strategy

– Marketing Investment

08/13/14

# Options Index

Fort Leonard Wood, Missouri

08/13/14 

### OPTION 1, 2 YEAR TERM

– STL SERVICE

CESSNA GRAND CARAVAN

Fort Leonard Wood, Missouri

– Lambert St. Louis International Airport

Cessna Grand Caravan 28 Round Trips Per WeekOperation Revenues

TBN

- STL Revenues $ 604,500

Other Revenues 6,045

Total Operating Revenues $ 610,545

Direct Operating Expenses

Flying Operations $ 288,288

Fuel and Oil 522,909

Maintenance 486,472

Aircraft Leases 410,000

Total Direct $ 1,707,669

Marketing 50,000

Indirect 897,533

Total Operating Expenses $ 2,655,202

Operating Loss $ 2,044,657

Profit Element (5% total Oper. Exp.) 132,760

Compensation Required $ 2,177,417

Compensation per PAX $ 140

Compensation per Departure $761 

### Fort Leonard Wood, Missouri

–

Cessna Grand Caravan

Option 1: 2 Year Term

28 Total Round Trips Per Week

– Based on 98% Completion Rate



## Fort Leonard Wood, Missouri

– Lambert St. Louis International Airport

# Passengers: 15,500

Average Fare: $39.00

Departures: 2,863

Block Hours: 1,946

Revenue Passenger Miles: 1,829,000

Available Seat Miles: 3,030,693

08/13/14 Estimated Flight Operations

Departure Arrival

TBN @ 7:30 AM STL @ 8:25 AM

STL @ 9:30 AM TBN @ 10:25 AM

TBN @ 10:45 AM STL @ 11:40 AM

STL @ 12:00 PM TBN @ 12:55 PM

TBN @ 2:00 PM STL @ 2:55 PM

STL @ 3:30 PM TBN @ 4:25 PM

TBN @ 5:00 PM STL @ 5:55 PM

STL @ 7:20 PM TBN @ 8:15 PM

# Air Choice One Has The Keys

To Your Success

08/13/14 ALL SEATING FIRST CLASS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

No. 83801 YUXIA ZHANG, Appellant, 

# FILED

vs. THE STATE OF NEVADA,



## Respondent. DEC 0 3 2021

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL This is a pro se appeal challenging a district court order setting a briefing schedule and hearing. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Cristina D. Silva, Judge.

Because no statute or court rule permits an appeal from an order setting a briefing schedule and hearing in a criminal matter, we lack jurisdiction to consider this appeal. Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 352, 792 P.2d 1133, 1135 (1990). Accordingly, we

ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.



### "S1606.146%f

ull 'N. arraguirre 

## Á4i s ai-.0 Stiglich Silver

cc: Hon. Cristina D. Silva, District Judge Yuxia Zhang Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk ELIZABETH CLEsšè SU BY BROWN

E COURT
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Corporate Trust Services**

  MAC R1204-010  9062 Old Annapolis Road  Columbia, MD 21045  Tel: 410 884 2000  Fax: 410 715 2380 |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

Deutsche Mortgage & AssetReceiving Corporation

60 WALL ST

NEW YORK, New York 10005-2836

 

Re:  Annual Statement ofCompliance for COMM 2013-CCRE7 Commercial Mortgage-Pass-Through Certificates

 

Per the Pooling and ServicingAgreement dated as of April 1, 2013 (the "Agreement"), theundersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., asCertificate Administrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies asfollows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2016 (the "ReportingPeriod"):

 

(a) A review of Wells Fargo'sactivities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under theAgreement has been made under such officer's supervision; and

 

(b) To the best of suchofficer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of itsobligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout thereporting period, except as noted in Schedule A.

 

 

February 10, 2017

 

 

/s/ Brian Smith

BRIAN SMITH

Vice President

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll  go far |
|------------------------|-------------------------------------|
229 So.2d 350

#### CITY OF HOUMA v. LOUISIANA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY.

No. 50261.

Dec. 11, 1969.

In re: Louisiana Power & Light Company applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition and mandamus, 229 So.2d 202.

Writs refused. Applicant has an adequate remedy by appeal in the event of an adverse judgment.
#### § 766.100 Scope.

This subpart sets forth the procedures for the Special Assessment of domestic utilities for funds to be deposited in the Fund.
§ 183.10 Applicability. ( a ) This part applies only to grants and cooperative agreements that are expected to exceed $50,000 and that are performed outside the United States, including U.S. territories, and that are in support of a contingency operation in which members of the Armed Forces are actively engaged in hostilities. It does not apply to the authorized intelligence or law enforcement activities of the Federal Government.
( b ) All elements of this part are applicable until the date of expiration as provided in law.
§ 1130.420 Disposition of equipment by an institution of higher education, nonprofit organization, local government, or Indian tribe. ( a ) *OMB guidance.* OMB guidance in 2 CFR 200.313(e) addresses disposition of original or replacement equipment acquired under a grant or cooperative agreement by an institution of higher education, nonprofit organization, local government, or Indian tribe.
( b ) *DoD implementation.* DoD implements 2 CFR 200.313(e) through award terms and conditions that govern disposition of original or replacement equipment acquired under an award by an institution of higher education, nonprofit organization, local government, or Indian tribe when there is a Federal interest in the equipment.
( c ) *Award terms and conditions.* A DoD Component's general terms and conditions must use the wording appendix D to this part provides for Section D of PROP Article IV to specify the requirements for disposition of equipment described in paragraph (b) of this section.
<PAGE>   1


                                   Exhibit 11


Statement re:  computation of per share earnings
------------------------------------------------

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                              Thirteen Weeks Ended             Thirty-nine Weeks Ended
                                            June 29,        June 30,          June 29,        June 30,
                                               1997            1996              1997             1996
                                          -----------       -----------       ----------      ------------

<S>                                        <C>               <C>              <C>               <C>       
Weighted average shares outstanding        12,174,949        12,446,168       12,196,836        12,818,541

Common Stock equivalents:
  Stock options                                40,728            69,323           58,697            68,520
                                         ------------       -----------      -----------      ------------

                                           12,215,677        12,515,491       12,255,533        12,887,061
                                         ============       ===========      ===========      ============


     Net Income(Loss)                    ($ 1,070,000)      $ 1,477,000      $   837,000      ($   620,000)
                                         ============       ===========      ===========      ============



EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE                $       (.09)      $       .12      $       .07      $       (.05)
                                         ============       ===========      ===========      ============
</TABLE>



                                       14
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          70,122
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             510
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    555,277
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         452,272
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           452,496
<LOANS>                                      1,657,642
<ALLOWANCE>                                     41,224
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,181,347
<DEPOSITS>                                   1,721,450
<SHORT-TERM>                                   343,549
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            445,864
<LONG-TERM>                                    329,774
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        25,985
<OTHER-SE>                                     288,319
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               3,181,347
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                127,437
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               47,342
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 4,380
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               179,159
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              74,143
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             102,940
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           76,219
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   10,150
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                              (2,029)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                148,164
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 51,007
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      24,003
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    24,003
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .92
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .92
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.65
<LOANS-NON>                                     23,931
<LOANS-PAST>                                     1,124
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                39,260
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   15,646
<RECOVERIES>                                     5,990
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               41,224
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            41,224
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 882 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 882

  Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives during Teacher 
 Appreciation Week regarding the importance of education, particularly 
                           civics education.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 8, 2018

 Mr. Norman submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
              the Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives during Teacher 
 Appreciation Week regarding the importance of education, particularly 
                           civics education.

Whereas educators play an important role in preparing students for the future;
Whereas through civics education parents, teachers, mentors, and all educators 
        emphasize the importance of understanding how our Government operates; 
        and
Whereas having students who are engaged and educated on the subject of civics 
        will have a positive impact on the future of the Nation: Now, therefore, 
        be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives that 
to continue to cherish our rights and duties, all Americans should 
recognize the importance of civics education.
                                 <all>
```