190 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 1 / Monday, January 3, 2011 / Notices 

NRC’s public documents. If you do not 

have access to ADAMS or if there are 

problems in accessing the documents 

located in ADAMS, contact the NRC’s 

PDR reference staff at 1–800–397–4209, 

301–415–4737, or by e-mail at 

pdr.resource@nrc.gov. 

The model application (with model 

no significant hazards consideration 

determination) and model SE for the 

plant-specific adoption of TSTF–513, 

Revision 3, are available electronically 

under ADAMS Accession Number 

ML101340271. The NRC staff 

disposition of comments received on the 

Notice of Opportunity for Comment 

announced in the Federal Register on 

October 9, 2009 (74 FR 52268–52274) 

and non-concurrence, are available 

electronically under ADAMS Accession 

Numbers ML101340278 and 

ML103480005. 

Federal Rulemaking Web site: The 

public comments received and 

supporting materials related to this 

notice can be found at http:// 

www.regulations.gov by searching on 

Docket ID: NRC–2009–0444. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. 

Matthew Hamm, Reactor Systems 

Engineer, Technical Specifications 

Branch, Mail Stop: O–7C2A, Division of 

Inspection and Regional Support, Office 

of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, U.S. 

Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 

Washington, DC 20555–0001; telephone: 

301–415–1472 or e-mail: 

Matthew.Hamm@nrc.gov or Mrs. 

Michelle Honcharik, Senior Project 

Manager, Licensing Processes Branch, 

Mail Stop O–12D1, Division of Policy 

and Rulemaking, Office of Nuclear 

Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear 

Regulatory Commission, Washington, 

DC 20555–0001; telephone: 301–415– 

1774 or e-mail: 

Michelle.Honcharik@nrc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: TSTF– 

513, Revision 3, is applicable to PWR 

plants. Licensees opting to apply for this 

TS change are responsible for reviewing 

TSTF–513, Revision 3, and the NRC 

staff’s model SE, referencing the 

applicable technical justifications, 

providing any necessary plant-specific 

information, and assessing the 

completeness and accuracy of their 

license amendment request (LAR). It is 

acceptable for licensees to use plantspecific system names, TS numbering 

and titles. The NRC will process each 

amendment application responding to 

this notice of availability according to 

applicable NRC rules and procedures. 

The CLIIP does not prevent licensees 

from requesting an alternate approach or 

proposing changes other than those 

proposed in TSTF–513, Revision 3. 

However, significant deviations from 

the approach recommended in this 

notice or the inclusion of additional 

changes to the license require additional 

NRC staff review and would not be 

reviewed as a part of the CLIIP. This 

may increase the time and resources 

needed for the review or result in NRC 

staff rejection of the LAR. Licensees 

desiring significant deviations or 

additional changes should instead 

submit an LAR that does not claim to 

adopt TSTF–513, Revision 3. 

For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 

Melissa A. Ash, 

Acting Chief, Licensing Processes Branch, 

Division of Policy and Rulemaking, Office 

of Nuclear Reactor Regulation. 

[FR Doc. 2010–33074 Filed 12–30–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7590–01–P 

PEACE CORPS 

Proposed Information Collection 

Renewals 

ACTION: Submission for Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) review; 

comment request. 

SUMMARY: The Peace Corps has 

submitted the following two (2) 

information collection to the Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) for 

extension under the provisions of the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. This 

notice invites the public to comment on 

the renewal of two information 

collections: Correspondence Match 

Educator Enrollment Form and Teacher 

Survey (OMB 0420–0513) and Peace 

Corps Week Brochure (OMB 0420– 

0529). Peace Corps invites comments on 

whether the proposed collections of 

information is necessary for proper 

performance of the functions of the 

Peace Corps, including whether the 

information will have practical use; the 

accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the 

burden of the proposed collection of 

information, including the validity of 

the information to be collected; and, 

ways to minimize the burden of the 

collection of information on those who 

are to respond, including through the 

use of automated collection techniques, 

when appropriate, and other forms of 

information technology. 

DATES: Comments regarding this 

collection must be received on or before 

February 2, 2011. 

ADDRESSES: Interested persons are 

invited to submit comments regarding 

this proposal. Comments should refer to 

the proposal by name/or OMB approval 

number and should be sent via e-mail 

to: oira_submission@omb.eop.gov or fax 

to: 202–395–3086. Attention: Desk 

Officer for Peace Corps. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Denora Miller, FOIA Officer, Peace 

Corps, 1111 20th Street, NW., 

Washington, DC 20526, (202) 692–1236, 

or e-mail at pcfr@peacecorps.gov. 

Copies of available documents 

submitted to OMB may be obtained 

from Denora Miller. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Proposal 

to renew the following three (3) 

information collections currently 

approved collection of information: 

1. Title: Correspondence Match 

Enrollment Form and Teacher Survey. 

OMB Control Number: 0420–0513. 

Type of Review: Extension, without 

change, of a currently approved 

collection. 

Respondents: Educators interested in 

promoting global education in the 

classroom. 

Respondents’ Obligation To Reply: 

Voluntary. 

BURDEN TO THE PUBLIC

Educator form Teacher survey 

a. Annual reporting burden: .......................................................... 1667 hours .......................................... 250 hours 

b. Estimated average burden response: ...................................... 10 minutes .......................................... 15 minutes 

c. Frequency of response: ............................................................ Annually .............................................. Once 

d. Estimated number of likely respondents: ................................. 10,000 ................................................. 1,000 

e. Estimated cost to respondents: ................................................ $0.00 ................................................... $0.00 

Purpose of collection: The 

information is used to make suitable 

matches between the educators and 

currently serving Peace Corps 

Volunteers as well as assess 

programmatic functions. 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 1 / Monday, January 3, 2011 / Notices 191 

1Request of the United States Postal service to 

Add Priority Mail Contract 33 to Competitive 

Product List and Notice of Filing (Under Seal) of 

Contract and Supporting Data, December 17, 2010 

(Request). 

2. Title: Peace Corps Week Brochure. 

OMB Control Number: 0420–0529. 

Type Of Review: Extension, without 

change, of a currently approved 

information collection. 

Respondents: Returned Peace Corps 

Volunteers and parents of currently 

serving Peace Corps Volunteers. 

Respondents’ Obligation To Reply: 

Voluntary. 

BURDEN TO THE PUBLIC

a. Estimated total annual reporting burden: .......................................................................... 500 hours 

b. Estimated average burden response: ............................................................................... 3 minutes 

c. Frequency of response: .................................................................................................... Once 

d. Estimated number of likely respondents: .......................................................................... 10,000 

e. Estimated cost to respondents: ........................................................................................ $0.00 

Purpose of collection: This collection 

allows the Returned Volunteer Services 

Office to identify and provide support 

for interested people, promote these 

activities in local communities, and 

maintain address databases for future 

contact. 

Dated: December 23, 2010. 

Garry W. Stanberry, 

Deputy Associate Director for Management. 

[FR Doc. 2010–32915 Filed 12–30–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6051–01–M 

POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION 

[Docket Nos. MC2011–13 and CP2011–49; 

Order No. 614] 

New Postal Product 

AGENCY: Postal Regulatory Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Commission is noticing a 

recently-filed Postal Service request to 

add Priority Mail Contract 33 to the 

competitive product list. This notice 

addresses procedural steps associated 

with this filing. 

DATES: Comments are due: January 4, 

2011. 

ADDRESSES: Submit comments 

electronically via the Commission’s 

Filing Online system at http:// 

www.prc.gov. Commenters who cannot 

submit their views electronically should 

contact the person identified in FOR

FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT by 

telephone for advice on alternatives to 

electronic filing. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Stephen L. Sharfman, General Counsel, 

stephen.sharfman@prc.gov or 202–789– 

6820. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Table of Contents 

I. Introduction 

II. Notice of Filing 

III. Ordering Paragraphs 

I. Introduction 

Pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 39 

CFR 3020.30 et seq., the Postal Service 

filed a formal request and associated 

supporting information to add Priority 

Mail Contract 33 to the competitive 

product list.1 The Postal Service asserts 

that Priority Mail Contract 33 is a 

competitive product ‘‘not of general 

applicability’’ within the meaning of 39 

U.S.C. 3632(b)(3). Id. at 1. The Postal 

Service states that the prices and 

classification underlying this contract 

are supported by Governors’ Decision 

No. 09–6 in Docket No. MC2009–25. Id. 

The Request has been assigned Docket 

No. MC2011–13. 

The Postal Service 

contemporaneously filed a contract 

related to the proposed new product 

pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3632(b)(3) and 39 

CFR 3015.5. The instant contract has 

been assigned Docket No. CP2011–49. 

Request. In support of its Request, the 

Postal Service filed six attachments as 

follows: 

• Attachment A—a redacted copy of 

Governors’ Decision No. 09–6, originally 

filed in Docket No. MC2009–25, 

authorizing certain Priority Mail 

contracts; 

• Attachment B—a redacted copy of 

the contract; 

• Attachment C—a proposed change 

in the Mail Classification Schedule 

competitive product list; 

• Attachment D—a Statement of 

Supporting Justification as required by 

39 CFR 3020.32; 

• Attachment E—a certification of 

compliance with 39 U.S.C. 3633(a); and 

• Attachment F—an application for 

non-public treatment of materials to 

maintain redacted portions of the 

contract and supporting documents 

under seal. 

In the Statement of Supporting 

Justification, Josen Punnoose, Manager, 

Shipping Support (A), Shipping 

Services, asserts that the service to be 

provided under the contract will cover 

its attributable costs, make a positive 

contribution to institutional costs, and 

increase contribution toward the 

requisite 5.5 percent of the Postal 

Service’s total institutional costs. Id., 

Attachment D. Thus, Mr. Punnoose 

contends there will be no issue of 

market dominant products subsidizing 

competitive products as a result of this 

contract. Id. 

Related contract. A redacted version 

of the specific Priority Mail Contract 33 

is included with the Request. Id., 

Attachment B. The contract will become 

effective on the day after the 

Commission provides all necessary 

regulatory approvals. Id., Attachment B, 

at 5. The contract will expire 5 years 

from the effective date unless, among 

other things, either party terminates the 

agreement upon 30 days’ written notice 

to the other party. Id. The Postal Service 

represents that the contract is consistent 

with 39 U.S.C. 3633(a). Id., Attachment 

D. 

The Postal Service filed much of the 

supporting materials, including the 

specific Priority Mail Contract 33, under 

seal. Id., Attachment F. It maintains that 

the contract, customer-identifying 

information, and related financial 

information, including the 

accompanying analyses that provide 

prices, terms, conditions, cost data, and 

financial projections, should remain 

under seal. Id., Attachment F, at 2–3. It 

also requests that the Commission order 

that the duration of such treatment of all 

customer-identifying information be 

extended indefinitely, instead of ending 

after 10 years. Id., Attachment F, at 7. 

II. Notice of Filings 

The Commission establishes Docket 

Nos. MC2011–13 and CP2011–49 for 

consideration of the Request pertaining 

to the proposed Priority Mail Contract 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES