alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the Balance
Sheet at March 31, 1999 and the Statement of Operations for the six months then
ended, as included in this Form 10-QSB, and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                         OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                           MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                     217,458
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    0
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           217,458
<PP&E>                                           0
<DEPRECIATION>                                   0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             217,458
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            0
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                     2,814
<OTHER-SE>                               1,436,745
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               217,458
<SALES>                                          0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 0
<CGS>                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             8,386
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          (5,946)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  0
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (2,440)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                (2,440)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0



</TABLE>
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATIONS**I, Keith R. Phillips, Chief Financial Officer of Wellman, Inc., certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Wellman, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect tothe period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internalcontrol over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is beingprepared;  (b) Designed such internal control over financialreporting, or caused such internal control overfinancial reporting to be designed under oursupervision, to provide reasonable assurance regardingthe reliability of financial reporting and thepreparation of financial statements for externalpurposes in accordance with generally acceptedaccounting principles;  (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented inthis report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  (d) Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors: a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknessesin the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information;and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal controlsover financial reporting.        Date August 9, 2005 By:  /s/ Keith R. Phillips   Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 35.2

LOGO

Report on Assessment of Compliance with Regulation AB Item 1123

Pursuant to Item 1123 of Regulation AB, a review of the TransCentras activities during the year ended December 31, 2015 (the
Reporting Period) and of its performance under the servicing agreement between TransCentra and American Express(the Servicing Agreement) has been made under the undersigned officers supervision. To
the best of such officers knowledge, based on such review, TransCentra has fulfilled its obligations under the Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.



|              
|--------------
|              
|/s/ Lynn Boggs
|Lynn Boggs    
|President     

February 2, 2016

www.transcentra.com

tel: 678-728-2500    fax: 678-728-2501

4855 Peachtree
Industrial Boulevard, Suite 245, Norcross, Georgia 30092
#### BANK OF METROPOLIS, Respondent, v. McLEISH, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

December 24, 1914.)

Action by the Bank of the Metropolis against George McLeish. S. Fleischman, of New York City, for appellant. J. Delahunty, of New York City, for respondent.

No opinion. Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Order filed.
#### § 2701.513 Responsibilities.

For SBA, the Single Audit Senior Accountable Official is the Deputy Chief Operating Officer. The Single Audit Liaison is the Director, Office of Grants Management.

[81 FR 1115, Jan. 11, 2016]
§ 1.658 What records requirements must a third-party certification body that has been accredited meet? ( a ) A third-party certification body that has been accredited must maintain electronically for 4 years records created during its period of accreditation (including documents and data) that document compliance with this subpart, including: ( 1 ) Any audit report and other documents resulting from a consultative audit conducted under this subpart, including the audit agent's observations, correspondence with the eligible entity, verification of any corrective action(s) taken to address deficiencies identified during the audit;
( 2 ) Any request for a regulatory audit from an eligible entity;
( 3 ) Any audit report and other documents resulting from a regulatory audit conducted under this subpart, including the audit agent's observations, correspondence with the eligible entity, verification of any corrective action(s) taken to address deficiencies identified during the audit, and, when sampling and analysis is conducted, laboratory testing records and results from a laboratory that is accredited in accordance with § 1.651(b)(3), and documentation demonstrating such laboratory is accredited in accordance with § 1.651(b)(3);
( 4 ) Any notification submitted by an audit agent to the accredited third-party certification body in accordance with § 1.650(a)(5);
( 5 ) Any challenge to an adverse regulatory audit decision and the disposition of the challenge;
( 6 ) Any monitoring it conducted of an eligible entity to which food or facility certification was issued;
( 7 ) Its self-assessments and corrective actions taken to address any deficiencies identified during a self-assessment; and
( 8 ) Significant changes to its auditing or certification program that might affect compliance with this subpart.
( b ) An accredited third-party certification body must make the records of a consultative audit required by paragraph (a)(1) of this section available to FDA in accordance with section 414 of the FD&C Act.
( c ) An accredited third-party certification body must make the records required by paragraphs (a)(2) through (8) of this section available for inspection and copying promptly upon written request of an authorized FDA officer or employee at the place of business of the accredited third-party certification body or at a reasonably accessible location. If such records are requested by FDA electronically, the records must be submitted electronically not later than 10 business days after the date of the request. Additionally, if the records are maintained in a language other than English, an accredited third-party certification body must electronically submit an English translation within a reasonable time.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

April 23, 2012 

d0416 

Order 

 

April 23, 2012 

144315 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 144315 

 COA: 299233 

Ingham CC: 09-001464-FC 

DESHAWN RAY MILTON, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 1, 2011 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Exhibit 32.1

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

         In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of
Velocity Asset Management Inc. for the three months ended June 30, 2004, I, John
C. Kleinert, Chief Executive Officer of Velocity Asset Management, Inc. hereby
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

                  (1) such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the three months
                  ended June 30, 2004, fully complies with the requirements of
                  section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                  and

                  (2) the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form
                  10-QSB for the three months ended June 30 2004, fairly
                  presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
                  and results of operations of Velocity Asset Management, Inc.

                                    /s/ JOHN C. KLEINERT
                                    ----------------------------
                                    John C. Kleinert
                                    Chief Executive Officer


August 19, 2004

                                       25
#### Gardner *v.*Gardner.

Opinion delivered February 23, 1920.

Divorce — ex parte affidavits. — A divorce granted upon *ex part**affidavits will be reversed upon appeal though the appellant did not appear and object to their introduction.

Appeal from-Arkansas Chancery Court; *John M. Elliott,*Chancellor;

reversed.

*John W. Moncrief,*/or appellant.

*Ex parte*affidavits can not be accepted as competent evidence to support a decree for divorce. 5 Am. Dec. 419; 34 N. E.-20; 23 So. 703; 34 111. -306. The evidence must be upon depositions .taken upon due notice. Kirby’s Digest, §§ 3166, 3169, 3177-8; 3182-8; 70 Ark. 409.

*Robert L. Rogers*and *W. F. Terral,*for appellee.

A deposition is simply written testimony, and sometimes used synonomously with affidavit. 25 Fed. Cases 441-2; 53 Am. Dec. 270; 23 Fed. Cas. No objection can be made to the form of the testimony, as appellant did not appear and object to it. 122 Ark. 276; 18 Ark. 59; 88 *Id.*177. The objection can not be raised here for the first time. 15 Ark. 491; 18 *Id.*65; 87 *Id.*243. This court will presume that the depositions were taken as prescribed by statute. 6 Ark. 396; 86 *Id.*272.

McCulloch, C. J.

This is a suit for divorce, and the decree in accordance with the prayer of the complaint of appellee was granted on constructive service without appellant having appeared. The appeal was allowed by the clerk of this court.

The ground urged here for reversal is that the decree was rendered on *ex parte*affidavits. The record sustains appellant in this contention, for it recites that the cause was heard on the affidavits of appellee and two other witnesses. It is true that in the record certified by the clerk the testimony of each of the three witnesses is referred to as a deposition, The originals have been brought up *293for our inspection, and they are also marked depositions, bnt they show that they were in fact not depositions, but were *ex parte*affidavits. There is no caption nor certificate of an officer showing that the depositions were taken at a designated time and place. Accepting the recitals of the record as true, which we should do on appeal, it is apparent that the decree was based solely on *ex parte*affidavits introduced in evidence, and it has been decided by this court that it is error to accept such character of evidence, and that it cannot be made the basis of a decree for divorce. *Johnson*v. *Johnson,*122 Ark. 276.

It is contended by counsel for appellee that no advantage can be taken of the form in which the testimony was introduced because appellant did not appear and object to it. This argument is answered by the decision of this court in the case just cited, where it was expressly held that *ex parte*affidavits could not be received in evidence at all, and that a decree could not be supported by that form of testimony.

The decree is, therefore, reversed and the cause is remanded for further proceedings.
EXHIBIT 32.1



STRATEX NETWORKS, INC.

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the periodic report of Stratex Networks, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Charles D. Kissner, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States
Code, that to the best of my knowledge:



(1) the Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and



(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at
the dates and for the periods indicated.



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.



|                       |  |                        
|---------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: February 9, 2006 |  | /s/ Charles D. Kissner 
|                       |  | Charles D. Kissner     
|                       |  | Chief Executive Officer
IV 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 232 

Recognizing linemen, the profession of linemen, the contributions of these 

brave men and women who protect public safety, and expressing support 

for the designation of April 18, 2017, as National Lineman Appreciation 

Day. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 27, 2017 

Mr. ROUZER submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing linemen, the profession of linemen, the contributions of these brave men and women who protect public 

safety, and expressing support for the designation of 

April 18, 2017, as National Lineman Appreciation Day. 

Whereas the profession of linemen is steeped in personal, 

family, and professional tradition; 

Whereas linemen are often first responders during storms 

and other catastrophic events, working to make the scene 

safe for other public safety heroes; 

Whereas linemen must work high atop powerlines 24 hours 

a day, 365 days a year, to keep electricity flowing; 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 232 IH 

Whereas linemen play a vital role in the Nation’s economy by 

maintaining and growing the energy infrastructure of the 

United States; 

Whereas linemen must often work under dangerous conditions separated from their families to keep schools and 

businesses open; 

Whereas linemen deserve recognition from the community regarding the danger of their work; and 

Whereas April 18, 2017, would be an appropriate date to 

designate as National Lineman Appreciation Day: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) recognizes the efforts of linemen in keeping 

3 the power on and protecting public safety; and 

4 (2) supports the designation of National Line5 man Appreciation Day. 

Æ 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
From: Sen.t;' To: .". ,,', .,-/ ,-" Jaimie Trautman Uaimietrautman@gmail.com] Saturday, February 13,20109:07AM Del/shy, Dennis (OST) Subject: EAS' Selection Clinton Co; NY 

### Devany, Dennis (OST)

"'

... "**Th~ Qli~tgn** **e(~;Legislature** took a stand that is not supportedbythe residents ofthis county. Against all common sense and business sense from the point ofview ofcounty residents they voted to recommend Colgan Air to replace Cape Air.,,:Ticket rates will increase, the number offlights will decrease, and we will be giving up a company that has a proven track record for safety, timeliness, responsiveness and integrity. A major argument was that bigger planes are needed. It is a fallacious argument. Many planes currently fly with empty seats. Cape Air has said itwillprovidemore planes and more flights ifthere is additional demand. More planes and more flights are ahetterresponse to demand than fewer flights and bigger planes. The survey carried outby the North Country Chamber ofCommerce and accepted as a basis for their decision by the County Legislature was slanted toward the Chamber's desired conclusion. In its argument to the Legislature, the Chamberpushed Quebec residents' opinion. What about Clinton County residents' opinion? We want Cape Air. Theyhave served us well and we are confident that they will continue to do so. Please use your vote to correct a huge mistake that ourLegislaturehas made by its vote for Colgan Air to replace Cape Air. Thank you for your attention, laimieTrautman Resident, Clinton County NY

. 1
#### § 2424.137 Who in HUD may grant an exception to let an excluded person participate in a covered transaction?

The Secretary or designee may grant an exception permitting an excluded person to participate in a particular covered transaction. If the Secretary or a designee grants an exception, the exception must be in writing and state the reason(s) for deviating from the governmentwide policy in Executive Order 12549.
#### § 170.308 Foreign public entity.

*Foreign public entity* has the meaning given in 2 CFR 200.1.

[85 FR 49526, Aug. 13, 2020]
#### § 1122.3 Definition of other terms as they are used in this part.

Because the meaning of some terms used in this part derive from their definitions in the statutes, Executive orders, or other sources of national policy requirements that this part implements, the meanings of those terms may vary from their meanings in other parts of the DoD Grant and Agreement Regulations. For example, some statutes define “State*”* in ways that differ from each other and from the definition provided in 2 CFR part B. In each case, the definition in the source of the pertinent national policy requirement takes precedence over the definition in 2 CFR part B for the purposes of complying with that requirement.
Exhibit 31.2

        SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, James J. Mastriani, Chief Financial Officer of Velocity Asset Management,
Inc. (the "Company"), do hereby certify that:

         1.       I have reviewed this amended quarterly report on Form 10-QSB/A
of the Company;

         2.       Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; and

         3.       Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
Company as of, and for, the period presented in this report.

         4.       The Company's other certifying officers and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the Company and have:

                  (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedure, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed, to ensure that material
information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period
in which this report is being prepared;

                  (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

                  (c) disclosed in this report any changes in the Company's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the company's
most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely
to materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting;
and

         5.       The Company's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation, to the Company's auditors and the audit
committee of the Company's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

                  (a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
internal controls over financial reporting which hare reasonably likely to
adversely affect the Company's ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and

                  (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the Company's
internal control over financial reporting.


                                        /s/ JAMES J. MASTRIANI
                                        ------------------------------------
                                        James J. Mastriani
                                        Chief Financial Officer

December 2, 2005

                                       26