alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certification.


I, David Nass, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on
    Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by
    this report on Form 10-K of the UBS-Barclays Commercial Mortgage
    Trust 2013-C5 (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

2.  Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
    whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
    to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
    light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
    misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
    information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
    covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic
    reports;

4.  Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required
    in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
    disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have
    fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all
    material respects; and

5.  All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing
    criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation
    reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
    asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in
    accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules
    13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report,
    except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances
    of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in
    this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
Information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:

Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, as
Master Servicer, Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National
Association, as Special Servicer, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas,
as Trustee, Certificate Administrator, and Custodian, Situs Holdings,
LLC, as Operating Advisor, Bank of America, National Association, as
Primary Servicer, and KeyBank National Association (as successor to
KeyCorp Real Estate Capital Markets, Inc.), as Primary Servicer.


    Dated:   March 28, 2014


    /s/ David Nass

    David Nass
    President
    (senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
EX-10.2 FOUNDERS' UNITS SUBSCRIPTION AGREEMENT



 







Exhibit 10.2




FOUNDERS’
UNITS SUBSCRIPTION AGREEMENT




TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF

FREEDOM ACQUISITION HOLDINGS, INC.:




          Berggruen Holdings North America Ltd. hereby subscribes for FOUR MILLION SIX HUNDRED
TWENTY-SEVEN THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED (4,627,500) units (“Units”) of Freedom Acquisition
Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Corporation”) for an aggregate purchase price
of TWELVE THOUSAND THREE HUNDRED AND FORTY DOLLARS AND 01/100 ($12,340.01), the receipt and
sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged. Each Unit shall consist of (i) one (1) share of the
Corporation’s common stock, par value $0.0001 per share (the “Common Stock”) and (ii) one
(1) warrant to purchase one share of Common Stock of the Corporation at $6.00 per share (each, a
“Warrant”). Upon receipt by the Corporation of said consideration on this date, the
Corporation shall issue to the undersigned a stock and warrant certificate or certificates (or, if
not certificated, provide documentation reflecting the registration in the name of the undersigned
on the stock and warrant ledgers of the Corporation) representing such fully paid and
non-assessable shares of Common Stock and Warrants of the Corporation. The subscription will
represent forty-nine and four-tenths percent (49.4%) of the total number of outstanding shares of
Common Stock and Warrants of the Corporation. Following such issuance of shares of Common Stock
and Warrants of the Corporation, the capitalization of the Corporation shall be as set forth on
Schedule A hereto.



[Signature Page to Follow]




 









 







	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Dated: July 20, 2006	 	BERGGRUEN HOLDINGS NORTH AMERICA LTD.
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	By:
	 	/S/ NICOLAS BERGGRUEN	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	Name:
	 	Nicolas Berggruen	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	Title:
	 	President	 	 	 	 
	Accepted and Agreed on this
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	20th
day of July 20, 2006:
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 





	 	 	 	 	 
	FREEDOM ACQUISITION HOLDINGS, INC.	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	By:

	 	/S/ NICOLAS BERGGRUEN	 	 
	Name:

	 	 

Nicolas Berggruen
	 	 
	Title:

	 	President	 	 






 








 






SCHEDULE A




Capitalization of Freedom Acquisition Holdings, Inc.




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Number of	 	Number of	 	Number of	 	Number of
	Stockholder	 	Units	 	Shares	 	Warrants	 	Ownership
	Berggruen Holdings North America Ltd.
	 	 	4,627,500	 	 	 	4,627,500	 	 	 	4,627,500	 	 	 	49.4	%
	Marlin Equities II, LLC
	 	 	4,627,500	 	 	 	4,627,500	 	 	 	4,627,500	 	 	 	49.4	%
	Herbert A. Morey
	 	 	40,000	 	 	 	40,000	 	 	 	40,000	 	 	 	0.4	%
	William P. Lauder
	 	 	40,000	 	 	 	40,000	 	 	 	40,000	 	 	 	0.4	%
	James N. Hauslein
	 	 	40,000	 	 	 	40,000	 	 	 	40,000	 	 	 	0.4	%
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Total
	 	 	9,375,000	 	 	 	9,375,000	 	 	 	9,375,000	 	 	 	100	%
#### Sequoia Construction Corp., Respondent, v James Hunt, Doing Business as J. V. L. Construction Company and as S & H Construction Company, Appellant.

In an action to recover damages for willful exaggeration of a mechanic’s lien and breach of contract, defendant appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered November 19, 1979, as denied his motion to open his default in answering and extend his time to answer. Order reversed insofar as appealed from, with $50 costs and disbursements, and motion granted. Defendant’s time to answer the complaint is extended until 20 days after service upon him of a copy of the order to be made hereon, together with notice of entry thereof. After considering a variety of factors including the short delay in serving the answer (for which a proper excuse was offered), the apparently meritorious defense, the complexity of the issues, the fact that defendant also has a related action pending against plaintiff (for which consolidation was requested), and the fact that settlement negotiations were conducted, we believe that the issues should be determined on the merits. Damiani, J. P., Gibbons, Gulotta and Weinstein, JJ., concur.
Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic 

and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of 

any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go 

to press.

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS

No. 23-BG-0956

IN RE RONALD ANDRE STEWART,

Respondent. DDN: 2023-D087

An Administratively Suspended Member 

of the Bar of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Bar Registration No. 490341

BEFORE: Deahl and Shanker, Associate Judges, and Fisher, Senior Judge.

O R D E R

(FILED— February 1, 2024)

On consideration of the certified order from the state of Tennessee transferring 

respondent to disability inactive status by consent; this court’s November 27, 2023, 

order maintaining respondent’s suspension pending final disposition of this 

proceeding and directing respondent to show cause why he should not be suspended 

based upon a disability pursuant to D.C. Bar R. XI, § 13; and the statement of 

Disciplinary Counsel, in which he requests that respondent’s reinstatement be 

conditioned upon his reinstatement in Tennessee; and it appearing that respondent

has not filed a response or his D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g) affidavit; and it further 

appearing that respondent has not opposed the proposed reinstatement condition, it 

is

ORDERED that Ronald Andre Stewart is hereby indefinitely suspended from 

the practice of law in the District of Columbia pursuant to D.C. Bar R. XI, § 13(e). 

Reinstatement is subject to the requirements of D.C. Bar R. XI, § 13(g) and 

respondent’s reinstatement in Tennessee. See In re Sibley, 990 A.2d 483, 487-88

(D.C. 2010) (explaining that there is a rebuttable presumption in favor of imposition 

of identical discipline and exceptions to this presumption should be rare); In re 

Fuller, 930 A.2d 194, 198 (D.C. 2007) (rebuttable presumption of identical 

reciprocal discipline applies to all cases in which the respondent does not 

participate); In re Stanley, 769 A.2d 141 (D.C. 2001) (disability suspension is the 

functional equivalent of inactive status based on disability). It is
No. 23-BG-0956

FURTHER ORDERED that for purposes of reinstatement, respondent’s 

suspension will not begin to run until such time as he files an affidavit that fully 

complies with the requirements of D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g).

PER CURIAM
ISSUE : 2 of 19/03/2004 SB 90-25-012 ANNEX 1

DATE : 18/01/2001 PAGE : 1 / 2

SB – Form CE 025 – 10/93

58(/8&,(1&283(7,6628'81)5$1&(7(/(3+21(7(/()$;6,7$&+ 56,&5

# 	


SERVICE BULLETIN ANNEX

N° 90-25-012

ATA system: 25

SUBJECT:



## PASSENGER SEAT ASSEMBLIES

BACKREST LINKS INSPECTION

# 	


SERVICE BULLETIN

ISSUE : 2 of 19/03/2004 SB 90-25-012 ANNEX 1

DATE : 18/01/2001 PAGE : 2 / 2

SB – Form CE 025

– 10/93

58(/8&,(1&283(7,6628'81)5$1&(7(/(3+21(7(/()$;6,7$&+ 56,&5 

## List of SICMA seat series concerned by the service bulletin application.

SEAT SERIES ALL SEAT P/Ns AND S/Ns ARE AFFECTED REMARKS

SERIES 91xx

9140 All seat P/Ns and S/Ns are affected - 9166 All seat P/Ns and S/Ns are affected - 9173 All seat P/Ns and S/Ns are affected - 9174 All seat P/Ns and S/Ns are affected - 9184 All seat P/Ns and S/Ns are affected - 9188 All seat P/Ns and S/Ns are affected - 9196 All seat P/Ns and S/Ns are affected - 91B7 All seat P/Ns and S/Ns are affected - 91B8 All seat P/Ns and S/Ns are affected - 91C0 All seat P/Ns and S/Ns are affected - 91C2 All seat P/Ns and S/Ns are affected - 91C4 All seat P/Ns and S/Ns are affected - 91C5 All seat P/Ns and S/Ns are affected -



### SERIES 93xx

9301 All seat P/Ns and S/Ns are affected -



### SERIES 95xx

9501 Only these seats are affected : 9501311-05, 9501301-06, 9501311-15, 9501301-16, 9501441-30, 9501441-33, 9501311-55, 9501301-56, 9501441-83, 9501441-95, 9501311-97, 9501301-98 Affected seats are equipped with In-armtable. Standard seats are not concerned.
§ 1130.200 Purpose of PROP Article II. ( a ) PROP Article II prescribes standards for: ( 1 ) Insurance coverage for real property and equipment acquired or improved under awards;
( 2 ) The system that a recipient uses to manage both equipment that is acquired or improved in whole or in part under awards and federally owned property.
( b ) It thereby implements OMB guidance in 2 CFR 200.310 and 200.313(d)(1) through (4), and partially implements 2 CFR 200.313(b).
Editorial Note on Part 61
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 61 appear at 80 FR 74980, Dec. 1, 2015, and at 81 FR 86909, Dec. 2, 2016.

§ 61.25 Changes. ( a ) Except as provided for in specific license conditions, the licensee shall not make changes in the land disposal facility or procedures described in the license application. The license will include conditions restricting subsequent changes to the facility and the procedures authorized which are important to public health and safety. These license restrictions will fall into three categories of descending importance to public health and safety as follows: ( 1 ) those features and procedures which may not be changed without (i) 60 days prior notice to the Commission, (ii) 30 days notice of opportunity for a prior hearing, and (iii) prior Commission approval;
( 2 ) those features and procedures which may not be changed without (i) 60 days prior notice to the Commisson, and (ii) prior Commission approval; and
( 3 ) those features and procedures which may not be changed without 60 days prior notice to the Commission. Features and procedures falling in paragraph (a)(3) of this section may not be changed without prior Commission approval if the Commission, after having received the required notice, so orders.
( b ) Amendments authorizing site closure, license transfer, or license termination shall be included in paragraph (a)(1) of this section.
( c ) The Commission shall provide a copy of the notices of opportunity for hearing provided in paragraph (a)(1) of this section to State and local officials or tribal governing bodies specified in § 2.104(c) of this chapter.
[47 FR 57463, Dec. 27, 1982, as amended at 77 FR 46600, Aug. 3, 2012]
H. Res. 698

In the House of Representatives, U.S., 

March 14, 2006.

Whereas it was through the brave and noble efforts of the 

Nation’s forefathers that the United States first gained 

freedom and became a sovereign nation; 

Whereas there are more than 1,300,000 active component 

and more than 1,100,000 reserve component members of 

the Armed Forces serving the Nation in support and defense of the values and freedom that all Americans cherish; 

Whereas the members of the Armed Forces deserve the utmost respect and admiration of their fellow Americans 

for putting their lives in danger for the sake of the freedoms enjoyed by all Americans; 

Whereas members of the Armed Forces are defending freedom and democracy around the globe and are playing a 

vital role in protecting the safety and security of all 

Americans; 

Whereas the nation officially celebrates and honors the accomplishments and sacrifices of veterans, patriots, and 

leaders who fought for freedom, but does not yet officially 

pay tribute to those who currently serve in the Armed 

Forces; 
2

•HRES 698 EH 

Whereas all Americans should participate in a moment of silence to support the troops; and 

Whereas March 26th, 2006, is designated as ‘‘National Support the Troops Day’’: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives that all Americans should participate in a moment of 

silence to reflect upon the service and sacrifice of members 

of the United States Armed Forces both at home and abroad.

Attest: 

Clerk.
§ 1120.710 Examples of programmatic requirements. Examples of provisions appropriately included as programmatic requirements in Subdivision D of the general terms and conditions include: ( a ) Requirements for recipients to acknowledge the DoD Component's support in publications of results of the projects or programs performed under awards.
( b ) Requirements for recipients to promptly alert the DoD Component if they develop any information in the course of performing the projects or programs under their awards that, in their judgment, might adversely affect national security if disclosed.
( c ) Reservation of the Government's right to use non-Federal personnel in any aspect of post-award administration of awards, with appropriate nondisclosure requirements placed on those personnel to protect sensitive information about recipients or the projects or programs supported by their awards.
|  | Newsletters/Meetings/ReportsNext »                                           				TVARA News - December 2015			12/12/2015				TVARA News - September 2015			8/27/2015				TVARA News - June 2015			6/15/2015				TVARA News - March, 2015			5/18/2015				TVARA News - December 2014			12/1/2014				TVARA News - September, 2014			9/1/2014				TVARA Board of Directors Meeting August 8, 2014			8/8/2014			 Photos of TVARA Baord of Directors Meeting, August 8, 2014							TVARA News - June 2014			6/1/2014				TVARA News - March, 2014			3/21/2014				November 7, 2013 TVARA Board Meeting Minutes			12/6/2013							Record 1 - 10 of 49 						Printer FriendlyMake Home PageEmail this PageCopyright © 2016  **TVA Retirees Association** • Knoxville, TN • (865) 632-3318 |  |
|--|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|
|  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  |
### IN THE UNI TED STAT ES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIF TH CIRCU IT

N o
. 1 0

- 3 0 1 6 3 C o n f e r e n c e C a l e n d a r

U N I T E D S T A T E S O F A M E R I C A , P l a i n t i f f

- A p p e l l e e

v
. T Y R U S M I G U E L C O O P E R , D e f e n d a n t

- A p p e l l a n t

A p p e a l f

r o m t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s D i s t r i c t C o u r t f o r t h e M i d d l e D i s t r i c t o f L o u i s i a n a U S D C N o
. 3 : 0 4

- C R

- 1 3 8

- 1

B e f o r e S M I T H , D E N N I S , a n d C L E M E N T , C i r c u i t J u d g e s
. P E R C U R I A M : *
T h e F e d e r a l P u b l i c D e f e n d e r a p p o i n t e d t o r e p r e s e n t T y r u s M i g u e l C o o p e r h a s m o v e d f

o r l e a v e t o w i t h d r a w a n d h a s f i l e d a b r i e f i n a c c o r d a n c e w i t h A n d e r s

v
. C a l i f o r n i a , 3 8 6 U

. S

. 7 3 8 ( 1 9 6 7 )

. C o o p e r h a s f i l e d a r e s p o n s e
. H e h a s a l s o f i l e d

a m o t i o n f

o r t h e a p p o i n t m e n t o f c o u n s e l

. O u r i n d e p e n d e n t r e v i e w o f t h e r e c o r d ,
c o u n s e l ’ s b r i e f , a n d C o o p e r ’ s r e s p o n s e d i s c l o s e s n o n o n f r i v o l o u s i s s u e f

o r a p p e a l

. A c c o r d i n g l y , c o u n s e l ’ s m o t i o n f o r l e a v e t o w i t h d r a w i s G R A N T E D , c o u n s e l i s U n i te d S ta te s C o u rt o f A p p ea l s

F i ft h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D Octob er 26 , 20 10 Lyle W . Cayce Clerk

Purs uant to 5 T H C I R

. R. 47.5 , the cour t has d ete rm ined t hat this op inion sho uld not * be publ ish ed and is not pr ece dent excep t unde r the lim ite d cir cum st ance s se t for th in 5 T H C I R

. R. 47.5 .4. Case: 10-30163 Document: 00511274559 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/26/2010N o
. 1 0

- 3 0 1 6 3

e x c u s e d f

r o m f u r t h e r r e s p o n s i b i l i t i e s h e r e i n , a n d t h e A P P E A L I S D I S M I S S E D

. S e e 5 T H C I R

. R

. 4 2

. 2

. C o o p e r ’ s m o t i o n f o r t h e a p p o i n t m e n t o f c o u n s e l i s D E N I E D

.

2 Case: 10-30163 Document: 00511274559 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/26/2010
EXHIBIT-10.3



 






	 	 	 	 	 



EXHIBIT 10.3




FIRST AMENDMENT

TO

DEFERRED SHARE

LONG-TERM LOYALTY BONUS AGREEMENT



A. The Deferred Share Long-Term Loyalty Bonus Agreement (the “Agreement”) made as of December
31, 2003 by and between CentraCore Properties Trust (f/k/a Correctional Properties Trust), a
Maryland real estate investment trust (the “Company”), and Charles R. Jones (the “Participant”) is
hereby amended as follows:





     1. Section 3 of the Agreement is hereby amended by deleting the period at the end of
subsection (a)(ii) and by adding “, or” in lieu thereof.



     2. Section 3 of the Agreement is hereby further amended by adding the following subsection
3(a)(iii) immediately after subsection 3(a)(ii) thereof:




               ”(iii) Upon a ‘Change in Control,’ as defined in his Employment
Agreement.”



     3. Section 4(a) of the Agreement is hereby amended by deleting the last sentence thereof and
substituting therefor the following:




“Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Company shall deliver the Common
Shares of the Company to the Participant immediately following the
vesting event described in subsection 3(a)(iii). Upon such delivery
of Common Shares to the Participant, this Agreement shall
terminate.”



 









 




B. Except as amended herein, the Agreement is hereby confirmed in all other respects.




     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this First Amendment is entered into this twenty-seventh day of July, 2006
by the parties hereto.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	CENTRACORE PROPERTIES TRUST,

a Maryland real estate investment trust

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ Clarence Anthony
 	 
	 	 	Name:  	Clarence Anthony 	 
	 	 	Title:  	Chairman of the Compensation
Committee 	 
	 
	 	 	 
	 	                                                  /s/ Charles R. Jones
 	 
	 	Charles R. Jones
| USGS HomeContact USGSSearch USGS |
|----------------------------------|
| Fact Sheet 077–95          |

|                                                                                                                                     |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   About USGS /  Science Topics /  Maps, Products & Publications /  Education / FAQ |
|                                                                                                                                     |

## Aeromagnetic Investigations of Hazardous Waste Sites

### Introduction

Aeromagnetic survey data collected by helicopter over hazardous waste sites can  be used to map the distribution of buried metallic (ferrous) objects at these  sites, including drums and scrap metal. Thorough knowledge of the locations  and nature of hazardous waste containers and contaminated objects is needed  prior to the start of remediation efforts. Non-invasive geophysical techniques  such as the aeromagnetic method provide the best way to obtain this knowledge.  The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) not only has experience in processing and  interpreting aeromagnetic surveys of this type but also offers aid in the design  and monitoring of contracts for such surveys.
#### In the Matter of Ellanore Lamb et al., Respondents, v. John Butler et al., Respondents, and C. Herbert Oliver, Appellant.

In a proceeding to invalidate petitions designating certain candidates in the Democratic Party Primary Election for the 37th Assembly District, Kings County, to be held on June 23, 1970, namely, respondent John Butler for nomination for the public office of Member of the Assembly, and appellant C. Herbert Oliver and respondent Thelma J. Hamilton as Member of the State Committee, Male and Female respectively, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered June 10, 1970, which enjoined the respondent Board of Elections from placing the name of appellant on the ballot and dismissed the proceeding in all other respects. Judgment affirmed insofar as it affects appellant, without costs. No opinion. Rabin, Acting P. J., Munder, Martuscello, Latham and Benjamin, JJ., concur.
(June 19, 1969)

#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Joseph Wojack, Petitioner, v. Ross E. Herold, as Director of Dannemora State Hospital, Respondent.

Application, pursuant to CPLR 7002 (subd. [b], par. 2), for a *855writ of habeas corpus denied for failure of compliance with article 70 of the OPLR, and more particularly with the provisions of CPLR 7002 (subd. [c], pars. 5, 6)' thereof, and as otherwise insufficient on its face. Gibson, P, J., Herlihy, Reynolds, Staley, Jr., and Cooke, JJ., concur.