alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.23

                             AGREEMENT TO TERMINATE
               AMENDED AND RESTATED SURPLUS MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
                                     BETWEEN
                           XL REINSURANCE AMERICA INC.
                                       AND
                            XL CAPITAL ASSURANCE INC.

This Agreement (the "Termination Agreement"), effective ____________, 2006 (the
"Effective Date") is entered into by and between XL Reinsurance America Inc.
(formerly known as NAC Reinsurance Corporation)("XLRA"), a New York domiciled
insurance company, and XL Capital Assurance Inc. ("XLCA") a New York domiciled
stock insurance corporation.

                                   WITNESSETH:

         WHEREAS, XLRA and XLCA are parties to an Amended and Restated Surplus
Maintenance Agreement (the "SMA") originally incepting on February 20, 2001, and
renewed by the parties effective February 20, 2004, pursuant to which XLRA
agreed to enable XLCA to maintain a surplus as regards policyholders of at least
$75,000,000; and

         WHEREAS, XLRA and XLCA have deemed it desirable to terminate the SMA
effective _________; and

         WHEREAS, the SMA provides that it may be amended at any time by a
written amendment or agreement signed by both XLRA and XLCA, subject to
regulatory approval; and

         WHEREAS, the New York Insurance Department has advised by letter dated
___________, 2006 that it has no objection to this Termination Agreement;

     NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises herein contained,
the parties hereto agree as follows:

         1.   TERMINATION: the SMA shall terminate effective ____________, 2006.

         2.   SUCCESSORS: the covenants, representations, warranties and
              agreements herein set forth shall be mutually binding upon and
              inure to the mutual benefit of XLRA and its successors and XLCA
              and its successors.

         3.   ENFORCEABILITY. This Termination Agreement shall have no force and
              effect except upon the written approval of the Superintendent of
              Insurance of the State of New York.

         4.   GOVERNING LAW. This Termination Agreement shall be governed by the
              laws of the State of New York.

<PAGE>

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Termination Agreement to
be duly entered into as of the date first above written.

                                       XL REINSURANCE AMERICA INC.



                                       By:___________________________
                                       Name:
                                       Title:


                                       XL CAPITAL ASSURANCE INC.




                                       By:___________________________
                                       Name:
                                       Title:
14910-13-P]

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT AnON

Federal AviatioD Administration

ONCURRENCE.'

OLJTINGWMBOL

Ainvorthiness Directives; Empresa BrasiJeira de Aeronautica S.A. (EMBRAER) Mode

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of Transportation

(DOT).

EMB-135BJ, -135ER, -135KE, -135KL, -135LR, -145, -145ER, -145MR, -145LR,

-145XR, -145MP~ and -145EP Airplanes

RlN 2120-AA64

14 CFR Part 39

11.0- SR..

(Docket No. FAA-2009-0132; Directorate IdentiJier 2008-NM-081-AD; Amendment I '; I

I(,~(.. ilO 10-1\ -'-0I

39-~; AD=k***_* '_ ••110)

ACTION: Final rule. INlc~LSUMMARY: We are adopting a new airw0l1hiness directive (AD) for the products lisle -':' I

r "')"rv,(~

above. This AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness infom1ation (MeAl) 1<O:77'80L

originated by an aviation authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe

condition on an aviation product. The MeAl describes the unsafe condition as:

During aircraft full scale fatigue test, it has been found the occurrence of

cracks in the cockpit windshield post lower eyelet fitting at the attachment

of the center post on the forward fuselage (881 53-10-19). Further analysis

of this cracking resulted in modifications on the aircraft Airworthiness

Limitation Items (ALI), to include new inspection tasks and its respective

intervals. Undetected fatigue cracking in this area could adversely affect

the structural integrity of these airplanes.

We are issuing this AD to require actions to COlTect the unsafe condition on these

products.

''''TIAl&'SIG
§ 415.9 Communication with State and local elected officials. ( a ) The Secretary provides notice to directly affected State, areawide, regional, and local entities in a State of proposed Federal financial assistance or direct Federal development if: ( 1 ) The State has not adopted a process under the Order; or
( 2 ) The assistance or development involves a program or an activity that is not covered under the State process.
( b ) This notice may be made by publication in the Federal Register or other appropriate means, which the Department in its discretion deems appropriate.
( c ) In order to facilitate communication with State and local officials the Secretary has established an office within the Department to receive all communications pertinent to this Order. All communications should be sent to the Office of the Chief Financial Officer, Room 143-W, 1400 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20250, Attention: E.O. 12372.
#### LAWRENCE, Respondent, v. HEANEY, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

June 19, 1914.)

Action by Harry W. Lawrence, as administrator, against Patrick J. Heaney.

H. S. Austin, of New York City, for appellant.

J. F. McIntyre, of New York City, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment and order affirmed. with costs. Order filed.

CLARKE, T , J., dissents.
§ 2900.20 Federal Agency Audit Responsibilities. In the DOL, in addition to 2 CFR 200.513, the department employs a collaborative resolution process with non-federal entities. ( a ) *Department of Labor Cooperative Audit Resolution Process.* The DOL official(s) responsible for resolution shall promptly evaluate findings and recommendations reported by auditors and the corrective action plan developed by the recipient to determine proper actions in response to audit findings and recommendations. The process of audit resolution includes at a minimum an initial determination, an informal resolution period, and a final determination. ( 1 ) *Initial determination.* After the conclusion of any comment period for audits provided the recipient/contractor, the responsible DOL official(s) shall make an initial determination on the allowability of questioned costs or activities, administrative or systemic findings, and the corrective actions outlined by the recipient. Such determination shall be based on applicable statutes, regulations, administrative directives, or terms and conditions of the grant/contract award instrument.
( 2 ) *Informal resolution.* The recipient/contractor shall have a reasonable period of time (as determined by the DOL official(s) responsible for audit resolution) from the date of issuance of the initial determination to informally resolve those matters in which the recipient/contractor disagrees with the decisions of the responsible DOL official(s).
( 3 ) *Final determination.* After the conclusion of the informal resolution period, the responsible DOL official(s) shall issue a final determination that: ( i ) As appropriate, indicate that efforts to informally resolve matters contained in the initial determination have either been successful or unsuccessful;
( ii ) Lists those matters upon which the parties continue to disagree;
( iii ) Lists any modifications to the factual findings and conclusions set forth in the initial determination;
( iv ) Lists any sanctions and required corrective actions; and
( v ) Sets forth any appeal rights.
( 4 ) *Time limit.* Insofar as possible, the requirements of this section should be met within 180 days of the date the final approved audit report is received by the DOL official(s) responsible for audit resolution.
[79 FR 76081, Dec. 19, 2014, as amended at 80 FR 81441, Dec. 30, 2015]
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 33 (Friday, February 19, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 7440]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-3286]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Eastern Washington Cascades Provincial Advisory Committee and the 
Yakima Provincial Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Eastern Washington Cascades Provincial Advisory Committee 
and the Yakima Provincial Advisory Committee will meet on March 9, 2010 
at the Sunnyslope Fire Station, 206 Easy Street, Wenatchee, WA. During 
this meeting information will be shared about Okanogan-Wenatchee 
National Forest Restoration Strategy, Wilderness Society North Cascades 
Proposal, and U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service update on the justification 
to not list the Pika as a threatened and endangered species. All 
Eastern Washington Cascades and Yakima Province Advisory Committee 
meetings are open to the public.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Direct questions regarding this 
meeting to Becki Heath, Designated Federal Official, USDA, Okanogan-
Wenatchee National Forest, 215 Melody Lane, Wenatchee, Washington 
98801, phone 509-664-9200.

    Dated: February 10, 2010.
Rebecca Lockett Heath,
Designated Federal Official, Okanogan-Wenatchee National Forest.
[FR Doc. 2010-3286 Filed 2-18-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-P
Exhibit 99.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Wellman, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Thomas M. Duff, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.







|By/s/Thomas M. Duff__
Chief Executive Officer
|---------------------------------------------
§ 1.1130 How will FDA oversee recognized accreditation bodies? ( a ) FDA will evaluate each recognized accreditation body to determine its compliance with the applicable requirements of this subpart no later than: ( 1 ) Year 4 of a 5-year recognition period; or
( 2 ) The midpoint of a recognition period less than 5 years.
( b ) An FDA evaluation of a recognized accreditation body may include review of records, an onsite evaluation of the accreditation body, and onsite reviews of one or more LAAF-accredited laboratories the recognized accreditation body LAAF-accredits, with or without the recognized accreditation body present. Certain evaluation activities may be conducted remotely if it will not aid in the evaluation to conduct them onsite.
( c ) FDA may conduct additional evaluations of a recognized accreditation body at any time to determine whether the recognized accreditation body complies with the applicable requirements of this subpart.
#### § 182.15 To whom does the guidance apply?

This part provides OMB guidance only to Federal agencies. Publication of this guidance in the Code of Federal Regulations does not change its nature—it is guidance and not regulation. Federal agencies' implementation of the guidance governs the rights and responsibilities of other persons affected by the drug-free workplace requirements.
#### § 3485.1017 Title IV, HEA program.

A title IV, HEA program includes any program listed in 34 CFR 668.1(c).

(Authority: E.O. 12549 (3 CFR 1986 Comp., p.189); E.O. 12689 (3 CFR 1989 Comp., p. 235); sec. 2455, Pub. L. 103-355, 108 Stat. 3327 (31 U.S.C. 6101 note); 20 U.S.C. 1082, 1094, 1221e-3, and 3474)
# EUR-Lex - 31993D0530 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31993D0530

**93/530/EEC: Commission Decision of 15 October 1993 amending Decision 93/387/EEC laying down special conditions for the import of live bivalve molluscs, echinoderms, tunicates and marine gastropods originating in Morocco **

*
Official Journal L 258 , 16/10/1993 P. 0032 - 0032 Finnish special edition: Chapter 3 Volume 53 P. 0034 Swedish special edition: Chapter 3 Volume 53 P. 0034 *

COMMISSION DECISION of 15 October 1993 amending Decision 93/387/EEC laying down special conditions for the import of live bivalve molluscs, echinoderms, tunicates and marine gastropods originating in Morocco

(93/530/EEC)THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community,

Having regard to Council Directive 91/492/EEC of 15 July 1991 laying down the health conditions for the production and placing on the market of live bivalve molluscs (1), and in particular Article 9 (4) thereof,

Whereas Commission Decision 93/287/EEC of 7 June 1993 laying down special conditions for the import of live bivalve molluscs, echinorderms, tunicates and marine gastropods originating in Morocco (2) establishes the list of the dispatch establishments approved for export to the European Community;

Whereas the Moroccan competent authorities officially approved additional dispatch establishments in accordance with Article 9 (3) (c) of Directive 91/492/EEC;

Whereas point I of Annex C to Decision 93/387/EEC should therefore be amended accordingly;

Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Veterinary Committee,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Point I in Annex C to Decision 93/387/EEC is hereby replaced as follows:

'I. Dispatch establishments

/* Tables: see OJ */

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 15 October 1993.

For the Commission

René STEICHEN

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ No L 268, 24. 9. 1991, p. 1.

(2) OJ No L 166, 8. 7. 1993, p. 40.
1

Filed 5/3/ 23 P. v. Cage CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Sacramento)

----

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

JIM CAGE,

Defendant and Appellant. C097197

(Super. Ct. No. 07F02966)

Defendant Jim Cage appeals the trial court’s denial of his petition for resentencing

under Penal Code section 117 2

. 6

. 1 Appellate counsel filed a brief raising no arguable

issues under People v. Delgadillo (2022) 14 Cal.5th 216

, and requesting we exercise our

discretion to review the entire record for arguable issues on appeal.

1 Defendant petitioned for resentencing under former section 1170.95. Effective

June 30, 2022, the Legislature renumbered former section 1170.95 as section 1172.6

without substantive changes. (Stats. 2022, ch. 58, § 10.)2

On December 31, 2022, appellate counsel wrot e defendant explaining she would

be filing a Delgadillo brief, and if defendant failed to file a propria persona supplemental

brief, his appeal would likely be dismissed as abandoned. On February 3, 2023, this

court sent a letter notifying defendant: (1) his counsel filed an appellate brief stating her

review of the record did not identify any arguable issues; (2) as a case arising from an

order denying postconviction relief, defendant was not constitutionally entitled to counsel

or to an independent review of the record; and (3) in accordance with the procedures set

forth in Delgadillo , de fendant had 30 days to file a supplemental brief or letter raising

any argument he wanted this court to consider. In addition, we notified defendant if this

court did not receive a letter or brief within that 30

- day period, the court may dismiss his

appea l as abandoned. More than 30 days have elapsed and we have received no

communication from defendant.

We consider defendant’s appeal abandoned and order the appeal dismissed.

( People v. Delgadillo

, supra , 14 Cal.5th at p. 232.)3 DISPOSITION

The appeal is dismissed.

/s/

HORST, J. 

We concur:

/s/

RENNER, Acting P.J.

/s/

BOULWARE EURIE, J.

 Judge of the Placer County Super ior Court, assigned by the Chief Justice pursuant to

article VI, section 6 of the California Constitution.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 81 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 81

  Directing the Clerk of the House of Representatives to post on the 
   official public Internet site of the House of Representatives all 
   lobbying registrations and reports filed with the Clerk under the 
                    Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 9, 2005

 Mr. Green of Wisconsin submitted the following resolution; which was 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Directing the Clerk of the House of Representatives to post on the 
   official public Internet site of the House of Representatives all 
   lobbying registrations and reports filed with the Clerk under the 
                    Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995.

    Resolved, 

SECTION 1. POSTING OF LOBBYING REGISTRATION AND DISCLOSURE STATEMENTS 
              ON HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES INTERNET SITE.

    (a) In General.--Not later than 60 days after receipt, the Clerk of 
the House of Representatives shall post on the official public Internet 
site of the House of Representatives each registration and report filed 
with and retained by the Clerk under the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 
1995 (2 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.), in a manner similar to the manner by 
which the Secretary of the Senate posts on the official Internet site 
of the Senate the registrations and reports filed with and retained by 
the Secretary under such Act.
    (b) Providing Notice on Forms.--The Clerk shall include on each 
registration and report form prepared and provided by the Clerk for 
purposes of the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995 a statement that the 
completed form will be posted on the official public Internet site of 
the House of Representatives in accordance with subsection (a).

SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    This resolution shall apply with respect to all registrations and 
reports filed with the Clerk of the House of Representatives on or 
after the date of the adoption of this resolution.
                                 <all>
```
DPN



Exhibit 4.2(3)

DEMAND PROMISSORY NOTE

US$40,000



In consideration of receiving a loan of US$40,000, the undersigned Reperio Exploration Inc. of 650 - 1500 West Georgia Street, Vancouver, BC, V6G 2Z6, does hereby PROMISE TO PAY to MRE Holdings Inc. of 650 - 1500 West Georgia Street, Vancouver, BC, V6G 2Z6, the sum of US$40,000, without interest, payable on demand. 

The undersigned and each endorser hereof waives demand and presentment for payment, notice of dishonor, notice of nonpayment, protest and notice of this Promissory Note.

DATED at Vancouver, British Columbia, this 19th day of April, 2006.


	
/s/"Alex Kurenov"
	
/s/ "Gord Samson"

	
(Name of Witness)
	
Gord Samson, President

	
Signature of Witness
	
Reperio Exploration Inc.
#### In the Matter of Rita Smith, Respondent-Appellant, v. George F. Chambers, as President of Nassau Community College, et al., Appellants-Respondents.

In a proceeding pursuant to article 78 of the CPLR to annul a notice terminating petitioner’s employment as Senior Library Clerk at the Nassau Community College, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered June 23, 1967, upon a jury verdict, which annulled the notice of termination and directed petitioner’s reinstatement to her position. (Petitioner’s cross appeal from a portion of the judgment is deemed withdrawn, in accordance with the request to such effect in her brief, without costs.) Judgment reversed, on the law, without costs; petition dismissed; and determination confirmed. The findings of fact below have not been affirmed. The petition, answer and affidavits submitted demonstrate that the dismissal of this probationary employee by the appointing officer was not arbitrary or capricious, but was in good faith. The issue should not have been submitted to a jury trial for determination *(Matter of Voll*v. *Helbing,*256 App. Div. 44, app. dsmd. 294 N. Y. 653; *Matter of Croft*v. *McGinnis,*24 Misc 2d 235). Brennan, Acting P. J., Hopkins, Benjamin, Munder and Martuseello, JJ., concur.
IV 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 85 

Expressing the commitment of the House of Representatives to continue 

to support pledges made by the United States in the Paris Agreement. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 2, 2017 

Mr. KRISHNAMOORTHI (for himself, Mr. SMITH of Washington, Mr. POLIS, 

Ms. LEE, Mr. CARTWRIGHT, Mr. LANGEVIN, Mr. SERRANO, Ms. 

WASSERMAN SCHULTZ, Mr. GARAMENDI, Mr. KIND, Mr. SCHIFF, Mr. 

SOTO, Mr. HASTINGS, Mr. DELANEY, Ms. SHEA-PORTER, Mr. 

CA ́RDENAS, Ms. MCCOLLUM, Ms. PINGREE, Ms. MATSUI, Mr. BLUMENAUER, Ms. BONAMICI, Mr. WELCH, Mr. QUIGLEY, Ms. HANABUSA, 

Mr. GRIJALVA, Ms. NORTON, Mr. MEEKS, Ms. LOFGREN, Ms. TITUS, Mr. 

TONKO, and Mr. COHEN) submitted the following resolution; which was 

referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the commitment of the House of Representatives 

to continue to support pledges made by the United 

States in the Paris Agreement. 

Whereas the year 2016 was the hottest year in the modern 

temperature record; 

Whereas there is increasing consensus among scientists and 

economists that there will be serious economic consequences if we fail to reduce global carbon emissions 

quickly; 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 85 IH 

Whereas a rising temperature due to a changing climate will 

irreversibly damage the global economy; 

Whereas if left unaddressed, the consequences of a rising 

global temperature will have the potential to adversely 

impact all Americans, hitting vulnerable populations 

hardest, hurting working families, and harming productivity in middle class job sectors such as construction, agriculture, and tourism, among others; 

Whereas there has been an increase in extreme weather 

events across the United States which have affected supply chains, consumer behaviors, and local economies; 

Whereas the Paris Agreement provides a pathway forward to 

limit temperature rise to well below 2 degrees Celsius; 

Whereas the Paris Agreement sends a powerful signal to the 

world that climate change is an immediate problem facing the planet in the 21st century; 

Whereas if the United States withdraws from the Paris 

Agreement, the United States will face an international 

diplomatic backlash; and 

Whereas if the United States withdraws from the Paris 

Agreement, the United States will cede leadership on climate change and renewable energy issues to China: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives commits 

2 to— 

3 (1) work with our allies that signed the Paris 

4 Agreement; and 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 85 IH 

1 (2) take meaningful action to ensure that the 

2 President of United States does not issue an Execu3 tive order to withdraw from the Paris Agreement. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS