alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, in accordance with 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in his respective capacity as an officer of ADOMANI, Inc., that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of ADOMANI, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2018 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of ADOMANI, Inc.

 

| Date: May 22, 2019 | By:    | /s/ James L. Reynolds                                   |
|--------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------|
|               |   | James L. Reynolds                                            |
|               |   | Chief Executive Officer, President and Chairman of the Board |
|               |   | (Principal Executive Officer)                                |
|               |   |                                                         |
|               |   |                                                         |
|               |   |                                                         |
| Date: May 22, 2019 | By:    | /s/ Michael K. Menerey                                  |
|               |   | Michael K. Menerey                                           |
|               |   | Chief Financial Officer and Director                         |
|               |   | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)                 |
§ 905.21 What is the administrative appeal process? ( a ) *Filing written appeals with Western.* If a customer disagrees with Western's decision on the acceptability of its IRP, small customer plan, minimum investment report or EE/RE report submittal, its compliance with an approved plan or report, or any other compliance issue, the customer may request reconsideration by filing a written appeal with the appropriate Regional Manager. Customers may submit appeals any time such disagreements occur and should be specific as to the nature of the issue, the reasons for the disagreement, and any other pertinent facts the customer believes should be brought to Western's attention. The Regional Manager will respond within 45 days of receiving the appeal. If resolution is not achieved at the Regional Office level, the customer may appeal to the Administrator, who will respond within 30 days of receiving the appeal.
( b ) *Alternative dispute resolution.* Upon request, Western will agree to use mutually agreeable alternative dispute resolution procedures, to the extent allowed by law, to resolve issues or disputes relating to compliance with the regulations in this subpart.
( c ) *Penalties during appeal.* Western will not impose a penalty while an appeal process is pending. However, if the appeal is unsuccessful for the customer, Western will impose the penalty retroactively from the date the penalty would have been assessed if an appeal had not been filed.
( d ) *Meeting other requirements during appeal process.* A written appeal or use of alternative dispute resolution procedures does not suspend other reporting and compliance requirements.
2008-0061.

#### Atelier Dist., LLC v. Parking Co. of Am., Inc.

Franklin App. No. 07AP-87, 2007-Ohio-7138. On motion for stay of court appeals’ judgment. Motion denied.

Lundberg Stratton, J., dissents.
#### Clare C. Bassile, Respondent, v Scott O. Myers, Appellant.

Submitted December 3, 2007;

decided January 15, 2008

Reported below, 2007 NY Slip Op 80565(U), 74431(U).

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the Appellate Division order dismissing the appeal to that Court from the judgment of divorce, dismissed as untimely *(see*CPLR 5513 [b]); motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the Appellate Division order denying appellant’s motion to vacate, dismissed upon the ground that such order does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution *(see*Karger, Powers of the New York Court of Appeals § 4:15, at 93-94 [3d ed rev]). Motion for a stay and related relief dismissed as academic.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Angel Rivera, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered April 8, 1968, convicting him of violation of the Public Health Law with respect to narcotics (three counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Judgment reversed, on the law, and case remanded for resentence of defendant in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Mental Hygiene Law. The findings of fact below are affirmed. The provisions of section 208 of the Mental Hygiene Law are mandatory in the instances specified therein (cf. *People*v. *Odom,*32 A D 2d 651). The record before us raises serious doubt as to whether defendant, who had been certified as a narcotic addict, was sentenced pursuant to section 208. His certification as an addict was not included among the papers on file in the office of the clerk of the trial court; and, although he admitted being an addict, the finding to that effect which was required by section 208 was not made by the sentencing court. Moreover, the record contains no indication that the court was even aware of the certification. In these circumstances the presumption of regularity does not prevail. Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, Rabin, Hopkins and Munder, JJ., concur.
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Florence D. Wilner, Appellant. Philip Ross, as Industrial Commissioner, Respondent.

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed February 25, 1980. Claimant was employed as a secretary by a nursing home. She requested and received a six-month leave of absence to begin after her vacation and to end on February 12, 1979. On December 4, 1978, claimant sought to return to her employment and was told that a written notice had to be submitted four weeks before she could return. She submitted the required notice and returned to work on January 2, 1979. On December 6, 1978, claimant filed a claim for unemployment insurance benefits seeking benefits for the period from December 4, 1978 to January 2, 1979. In a decision filed February 25, 1980, the board rescinded an earlier board decision filed September 19, 1979, and disqualified claimant from receiving benefits effective December 6, 1978 on the ground that she voluntarily left her employment without good cause. *564The board premised this decision on its finding that claimant severed her employment relationship on December 6, 1978 when she filed her claim for unemployment insurance benefits. There must be a reversal. In our view, the filing for unemployment insurance benefits while on a leave of absence does not constitute a voluntary leaving of employment. Respondent does not urge as the basis for affirmance the rationale utilized by the board, but instead, argues that claimant’s unemployment was the result of a voluntary separation from employment without good cause, dating from the time claimant began her vacation and thereafter her six-month leave of absence. In its decision filed September 19, 1979, the board did so conclude. That decision was rescinded by the board, however, and this specific issue has not been argued by claimant on this appeal, presumably because the September 19, 1979 decision was rescinded. Consequently, we do not deem it proper to determine this issue on the present appeal and conclude that the matter must be remitted to the board for further proceedings. Decision reversed, with costs, and matter remitted to the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board for further proceedings not inconsistent herewith. Greenblott, J. P., Sweeney, Kane, Main and Herlihy, JJ., concur.
§ 861.4 Use of site streets. All persons using the streets of the Nevada Test Site shall do so in a careful and safe manner. ( a ) The Nevada Test Site Traffic Regulations supplement this section by identifying the specific traffic requirements relating to such matters as: ( 1 ) Enforcement and obedience to Traffic Regulations, including the authority of police officers and traffic regulations, and responsibility to report accidents.
( 2 ) Traffic signs, signals, and markings, including required compliance with traffic lanes and traffic control devices, and prohibitions on display of unauthorized traffic signs, signals, or marking or interference with authorized traffic control devices.
( 3 ) Speeding or driving under the influence of intoxicating liquor or drugs, including prohibitions on reckless driving, and promulgation of maximum permissible speeds.
( 4 ) Turning movements, including required position and method of turning at intersections, limitations on turning around, and obedience to turning markers and no-turn signs.
( 5 ) Stopping and yielding, including obedience to stop and yield signs, requirements, when entering stop or yield intersections, emerging from alleys, driveways, or buildings, operation of vehicles on approach of authorized emergency vehicles and stops when traffic is obstructed.
( 6 ) Pedestrians' rights and duties, including pedestrian's right-of-way in crosswalks, when a pedestrian must yield, required use or right half of crosswalks and requirements concerning walking along roadways and prohibited pedestrian crossings.
( 7 ) Parking, stopping, and standing, specifying when parking, stopping, and standing are prohibited, including special provisions applicable to buses, requirements that parking not obstruct traffic and be close to curb, and concerning lamps on parked vehicles.
( 8 ) Privileges of drivers of authorized emergency vehicles, including exemptions from parking and standing, stopping, speeding and turning limitations, under specified circumstances and within specified limitations.
( 9 ) Miscellaneous driving rules, including requirements for convoys, and limitations on backing, opening and closing vehicle doors, following fire apparatus, crossing a fire hose, driving through a safety zone, through convoys, on sidewalks or shoulders of roadways, boarding or alighting from vehicles, passing a bus on the right, and unlawful riding.
( b ) The Nevada Test Site Traffic Regulations, when posted and distributed as specified in § 861.6, shall have the same force and effect as if made a part hereof.
#### § 960.3-1-4-3 Site recommendation for characterization.

The evidence required to support the recommendation of a site as a candidate site for characterization shall consist of the evaluations and data contained or referenced in the environmental assessment for such site, unless the Secretary certifies that such information, in the absence of additional preliminary borings or excavations, will not be adequate to satisfy applicable requirements of the Act.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JAN-02-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-04-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   APR-04-1999
<CASH>                                          64,670
<SECURITIES>                                    61,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                   44,077
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,807
<INVENTORY>                                     29,523
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               213,921
<PP&E>                                         926,023
<DEPRECIATION>                                 471,074
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 671,975
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          310,871
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           539
<OTHER-SE>                                     302,060
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   671,975
<SALES>                                         90,013
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                90,013
<CGS>                                           89,266
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   89,266
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                17,493
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    34
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,004
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (19,473)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       400
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (21,526)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (21,526)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.40)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.40)
        


</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 72
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 72 appear at 80 FR 74981, Dec. 1, 2015, and at 81 FR 86910, Dec. 2, 2016.

§ 72.240 Conditions for spent fuel storage cask renewal. ( a ) The certificate holder may apply for renewal of the design of a spent fuel storage cask for a term not to exceed 40 years. In the event that the certificate holder does not apply for a cask design renewal, any licensee using a spent fuel storage cask, a representative of such licensee, or another certificate holder may apply for a renewal of that cask design for a term not to exceed 40 years.
( b ) The application for renewal of the design of a spent fuel storage cask must be submitted not less than 30 days before the expiration date of the CoC. When the applicant has submitted a timely application for renewal, the existing CoC will not expire until the application for renewal has been determined by the NRC.
( c ) The application must be accompanied by a safety analysis report (SAR). The SAR must include the following: ( 1 ) Design bases information as documented in the most recently updated final safety analysis report (FSAR) as required by § 72.248;
( 2 ) Time-limited aging analyses that demonstrate that structures, systems, and components important to safety will continue to perform their intended function for the requested period of extended operation; and
( 3 ) A description of the AMP for management of issues associated with aging that could adversely affect structures, systems, and components important to safety.
( d ) The design of a spent fuel storage cask will be renewed if the conditions in subpart G of this part and § 72.238 are met, and the application includes a demonstration that the storage of spent fuel has not, in a significant manner, adversely affected structures, systems, and components important to safety.
( e ) In approving the renewal of the design of a spent fuel storage cask, the NRC may revise the CoC to include terms, conditions, and specifications that will ensure the safe operation of the cask during the renewal term, including but not limited to, terms, conditions, and specifications that will require the implementation of an AMP.
[76 FR 8891, Feb. 16, 2011]
§ 765.22 Appeals procedures. ( a ) Any appeal by a licensee of any Department determination subject to the requirements of this part, shall invoke the appeals process specified in paragraph (b) of this section.
( b ) A licensee shall file an appeal of any Department determination subject to the requirements of this part with the Office of Hearings and Appeals, U.S. Department of Energy, 1000 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20585. Any appeal must be filed within 45 days from the date the licensee received notice, actual or constructive (i.e., publication in the Federal Register), of the Department's determination. Appeals must comply with the procedures set forth in 10 CFR part 1003, subpart C. The decision of the Office of Hearings and Appeals shall be the final decision of the Department. A licensee must file an appeal in order to exhaust its administrative remedies, and the receipt of an appellate decision is a prerequisite to seeking judicial review of any determination made under this part.
[59 FR 26726, May 23, 1994, as amended at 60 FR 15017, Mar. 21, 1995]
#### A. H. Sebastian, Appellant, v. School Directors of District Number Fifty-Three, County of Clinton, Appellees.

opinion filed June 14, 1940.

Layman & Johnson, for appellant; W. W. Johnson, of counsel; William R. Murphy and Maurice B. Johnston, for appellees.

Opinion by

Presiding Justice Stone.

‘ 'Not to be published in full.”
#### Charles L. Matthews, Administrator of Estate of George W. Solomon, Deceased, Appellant, v. Franklin Life Insurance Company of Springfield, Appellee.

Gen. No. 9,226.

opinion filed July 15, 1940.

L. G. Pefferle, for appellant; James O. Jones and Lawrence Hoff, for appellee.

Opinion by

Justice Fulton.

“Not to he published in full.’’
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

# AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING:

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.

# DATE AND TIME:

Wednesday, December 29, 2010, 10 a.m. Eastern Time.

# PLACE:

Commission Meeting Room on the First Floor of the EEOC Office Building, 131 “M” Street, NE., Washington, DC 20507.

# STATUS:

The meeting will be open to the public.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

### Open Session

1. Announcement of Notation Votes, and

2. Regulations to Implement the Equal Employment Provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act, as amended.

# Note:

                        In accordance with the Sunshine Act, the meeting will be open to public observation of the Commission's deliberations and voting. (In addition to publishing notices on EEOC Commission meetings in the                         **Federal Register**                        , the Commission also provides a recorded announcement a full week in advance on future Commission sessions.)                    

                    Please telephone (202) 663-7100 (voice) and (202) 663-4074 (TTY) at any time for the most recent information on these meetings. The EEOC provides sign                           ( print page 80811)                        language interpretation at Commission meetings for the hearing impaired. Requests for other reasonable accommodations may be made by using the voice and TTY numbers listed above.                

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Stephen Llewellyn, Executive Officer on (202) 663-4070.

Dated: December 21, 2010.

Stephen Llewellyn,

Executive Officer, Executive Secretariat.

[FR Doc. 2010-32529 Filed 12-21-10; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6570-01-P
Editorial Note on Part 72
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 72 appear at 80 FR 74981, Dec. 1, 2015, and at 81 FR 86910, Dec. 2, 2016.

§ 72.124 Criteria for nuclear criticality safety. ( a ) *Design for criticality safety.* Spent fuel handling, packaging, transfer, and storage systems must be designed to be maintained subcritical and to ensure that, before a nuclear criticality accident is possible, at least two unlikely, independent, and concurrent or sequential changes have occurred in the conditions essential to nuclear criticality safety. The design of handling, packaging, transfer, and storage systems must include margins of safety for the nuclear criticality parameters that are commensurate with the uncertainties in the data and methods used in calculations and demonstrate safety for the handling, packaging, transfer and storage conditions and in the nature of the immediate environment under accident conditions.
( b ) *Methods of criticality control.* When practicable, the design of an ISFSI or MRS must be based on favorable geometry, permanently fixed neutron absorbing materials (poisons), or both. Where solid neutron absorbing materials are used, the design must provide for positive means of verifying their continued efficacy. For dry spent fuel storage systems, the continued efficacy may be confirmed by a demonstration or analysis before use, showing that significant degradation of the neutron absorbing materials cannot occur over the life of the facility.
( c ) *Criticality monitoring.* A criticality monitoring system shall be maintained in each area where special nuclear material is handled, used, or stored which will energize clearly audible alarm signals if accidental criticality occurs. Underwater monitoring is not required when special nuclear material is handled or stored beneath water shielding. Monitoring of dry storage areas where special nuclear material is packaged in its stored configuration under a license issued under this subpart is not required.
[53 FR 31658, Aug. 19, 1988, as amended at 64 FR 33184, June 22, 1999]
#### § 1326.10 What does this part do?

This part adopts the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) guidance in subparts A through I of 2 CFR part 180, as supplemented by this part, as the Department of Commerce policies and procedures for nonprocurement debarment and suspension. It thereby gives regulatory effect to the OMB guidance as supplemented by this part. This part satisfies the requirements in section 3 of Executive Order 12549, “Debarment and Suspension” (3 CFR 1986 Comp., p. 189), Executive Order 12689, “Debarment and Suspension” (3 CFR 1989 Comp., p. 235) and 31 U.S.C. 6101 note (Section 2455, Public Law 103-355, 108 Stat. 3327).