alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 3485.330 What methods must I use to pass requirements down to participants at lower tiers with whom I intend to do business? ( a ) Before entering into a covered transaction with a participant at the next lower tier, you must require that participant to— ( 1 ) Comply with this subpart as a condition of participation in the transaction. You must do so using the method specified in paragraph (b) of this section; and
( 2 ) Pass the requirement to comply with this subpart to each person with whom the participant enters into a covered transaction at the next lower tier.
( b ) To communicate the requirements in this part to a participant, you must include a term or condition in the transaction that requires the participant's compliance with part 180, subpart C, of this title, as adopted at § 3485.12, and requires the participant to include a similar term or condition in lower-tier covered transactions.
( c ) The failure of a participant to include a requirement to comply with Subpart C of 2 CFR part 180 in the agreement with a lower tier participant does not affect the lower tier participant's responsibilities under this part.
(Authority: E.O. 12549 (3 CFR 1986 Comp., p. 189); E.O. 12689 (3 CFR 1989 Comp., p. 235); sec. 2455, Pub. L. 103-355, 108 Stat. 3327 (31 U.S.C. 6101 note); 20 U.S.C. 1082, 1094, 1221e-3, and 3474)
§ 1400.876 May a respondent request administrative reconsideration of a decision? A respondent may request the Suspending and Debarring Official to review a decision under this part as follows: ( a ) Within 30 days of receiving the decision, the respondent may ask the Suspending and Debarring Official to reconsider the decision based on clear and material error(s) of fact or conclusion(s) of law that would change the outcome of the matter. The respondent bears the burden of demonstrating the existence of the asserted clear and material error(s) of fact or conclusion(s) of law.
( b ) The respondent's request for reconsideration must be submitted in writing to the Suspending and Debarring Official and include: ( 1 ) The specific finding(s) of fact and conclusion(s) of law the respondent believes are in error; and
( 2 ) The reasons or legal bases for the respondent's position.
( c ) The Suspending and Debarring Official may in the exercise of discretion stay the debarment pending reconsideration. The Suspending and Debarring Official will review the request for reconsideration and: ( 1 ) Notify the respondent in writing whether the Suspending and Debarring Official will reconsider the decision; and
( 2 ) If reconsideration occurs, notify the respondent in writing of the results of the reconsideration.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 664 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 664

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                      February 1, 2006.
    Resolved, That the following named Member be, and that he hereby is, elected 
to the following standing committee of the House of Representatives:
    Committee on House Administration: Mr. Ehlers, Chairman.
    Resolved, That the following named Member be, and that he hereby is, ranked 
as follows on the following standing committee of the House of Representatives:
    Committee on House Administration: Mr. Ney, after Mr. Ehlers.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
§ 1136.230 Access to records. ( a ) *OMB guidance.* OMB guidance in 2 CFR 200.336 and 200.337 addresses Federal Government and public access to recipient records related to grants and cooperative agreements.
( b ) *DoD implementation.* A DoD Component's general terms and conditions must provide for Federal Government access to records consistent with 2 CFR 200.336 and address public access to records to implement the guidance in 2 CFR 200.337.
( c ) *Award terms and conditions.* A DoD Component's general terms and conditions must use the wording appendix B to this part provides for Section F of OAR Article II.
#### § 3513.10 What does this part do?

This part adopts the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) guidance in subparts A through I of 2 CFR part 180, as supplemented by this part, as the Export Import Bank of the United States (Ex-Im Bank) policies and procedures for nonprocurement debarment and suspension. It thereby gives regulatory effect for Ex-Im Bank to the OMB guidance as supplemented by this part. This part satisfies the requirements in section 3 of Executive Order 12549, “Debarment and Suspension” (3 CFR 1986 Comp., p. 189), Executive Order 12689, “Debarment and Suspension” (3 CFR 1989 Comp., p. 235) and 31 U.S.C. 6101 note (Section 2455, Pub. L. 103-355, 108 Stat. 3327).
Page 1 of 3

Disposition Comments

Docket No: FAA-2013-1026 These comments are in

Directorate ID: 2012-NM-173-AD response to an SNPRM

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

Next Step: FRAN SNPRM

 No Comments/Only Supportive Comments Received – If this box is checked, no signatures are 

required.

No Has the referenced service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? If yes, 

list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously 

published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance.

Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of 

each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues 

from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and 

describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA-IR-M-8040.1C Chapter 9.

ISSUE 1: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD: 

If NO, we don’t agree because 

ISSUE 2: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD:
Page 2 of 3

If NO, we don’t agree because 

For additional issues, double-click here
Page 3 of 3

Signature Section

Signature indicates concurrence with this action.

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

ASE Printed Name: Date

Branch Manager Date
#### § 1104.115 Regulations governing DoD Components' internal procedures.

On an interim basis pending completion of the update of the DoDGARs to implement OMB guidance published in 2 CFR part 200, DoD Components' internal pre-award, time-of-award, and post-award procedures will continue to comply with requirements in parts 21 and 22 of the DoDGARs (32 CFR parts 21 and 22) and other applicable Defense Grant and Agreement Regulatory System (DGARS) policies.
Exhibit 32.2



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report  of The  Topps  Company,  Inc.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period ended  November 26, 2005,  as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Catherine K. Jessup, Vice President-Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the
Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







                                           /s/ Catherine K. Jessup
                                         --------------------------
                                               Catherine K. Jessup
                                        Vice President, Chief Financial
                                             Officer and Treasurer


January 5, 2006
###### Editorial Note on Part 72

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 72 appear at 80 FR 74981, Dec. 1, 2015, and at 81 FR 86910, Dec. 2, 2016.

#### § 72.172 Corrective action.

The licensee, applicant for a license, certificate holder, and applicant for a CoC shall establish measures to ensure that conditions adverse to quality, such as failures, malfunctions, deficiencies, deviations, defective material and equipment, and nonconformances, are promptly identified and corrected. In the case of a significant condition identified as adverse to quality, the measures must ensure that the cause of the condition is determined and corrective action is taken to preclude repetition. The identification of the significant condition adverse to quality, the cause of the condition, and the corrective action taken must be documented and reported to appropriate levels of management.
Company sanitized 

Does not contain Confidential Business 

Information (CBI)

Appendix D

Draft Facility Report on Product Content
2010/15 PFOA Stewardship Program 

Draft Facility Report on Product Content

I. CHEMICAL IDENTIFICATION

Identify the product (e.g fluoropolymer dispersion) for which you are submitting information:

Product name:___Fluorinated Surfactant (monomeric)_______

Product description (including concentrations of perfluoroalkyl chemicals 

identified in Section IV below and year of production): 

All products under the name of “Fluorinated Surfactant (monomeric)” are 

considered to be precursors to PFOA and higher homologues.

II. COMPANY IDENTIFICATION

Identify the company and location of the facility submitting information:

Company name:_AGC SEIMI CHEMICAL CO.,LTD

Site location:

 :

3-2-10,Chigasaki, Chigasaki City, Kanagawa, 253-8585 Japan

2276-2,Nada, Hirai, Kashima City, Ibaraki, 314-0012 Japan

Identify a company technical contact who can respond to inquiries about the information 

submitted:

Technical contact:_Shunji Odaka

Phone:

 

Address:

_+81-467-82-4398____

3-2-10, Chigasaki, Chigasaki City, Kanagawa, 253-8585 Japan

III. PRODUCTION

Calendar year for which you are reporting: Jan 1, 2010 to Dec 31, 2010

(Normalized data based on year end run rate)

Provide the amount of the product for the reporting year at each specific site:

 Imported ___0____kgs/yr

Manufactured _CBI__kgs/yr (As active ingredients)
IV. PRODUCT CONTENT

A. CONCENTRATIONS OF RELEVANT PERFLUOROALKYL CHEMICALS

Please provide the concentrations (ppb) of various perfluoroalkyl chemicals in your product. For 

chemicals for which you do not have actual data, please provide range estimates.

 CBI

B. ANALYTICAL METHODS

Analyses should be conducted using the most accurate instrumentation and procedures available 

as of the time of testing. Please provide detailed information on the methods used (including 

analytical standards used, sampling, sample treatment, analysis), assumptions made, uncertainties 

and detection limits (LOD, LOQ) for the data provided.

Active ingredients of the products and solvent/water compose commercial products.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 250 (Thursday, December 30, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 82379]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-32842]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 13871-000--Colorado]


Wagon Wheel Associates; Notice of Availability of Environmental 
Assessment

December 22, 2010.
    In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 
and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's regulations, 18 CFR part 
380 (Order No. 486, 52 FR 47897), the Office of Energy Projects has 
reviewed the application for exemption from licensing for the Humphreys 
Hydroelectric Project, to be located on Goose Creek (in the Rio Grande 
River basin), near the town of South Fork, in Mineral County, Colorado, 
and has prepared an Environmental Assessment (EA). In the EA, 
Commission staff analyze the potential environmental effects of the 
proposed project and conclude that issuing an exemption for the 
proposed project, with appropriate environmental measures, would not 
constitute a major federal action significantly affecting the quality 
of the human environment.
    A copy of the EA is on file with the Commission and is available 
for public inspection. The EA may also be viewed on the Commission's 
Web site at http://www.ferc.gov using the ``eLibrary'' link. Enter the 
docket number excluding the last three digits in the docket number 
field to access the document. For assistance, contact FERC Online 
Support at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#165053445559787a7f787345636666796462567073647538717960"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="34727166777b5a585d5a51674144445b464074525146571a535b42">[email protected]</span></a> or toll-free at (866) 208-3676, 
or for TTY, (202) 502-8659.
    You may also register online at http://www.ferc.gov/esubscribenow.htm to be notified via e-mail of new filings and 
issuances related to this or other pending projects. For assistance, 
contact FERC Online Support at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f0b6b5a2b3bf9e9c999e95a38580809f8284b096958293de979f86"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="83c5c6d1c0ccedefeaede6d0f6f3f3ecf1f7c3e5e6f1e0ade4ecf5">[email protected]</span></a> or toll-free 
at 1-866-208-3676, or for TTY, (202) 502-8659.
    Please contact Carolyn Templeton by telephone at (202) 502-8785 or 
by e-mail at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e28183908d8e9b8ccc96878f928e87968d8ca284879081cc858d94"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d7b4b6a5b8bbaeb9f9a3b2baa7bbb2a3b8b997b1b2a5b4f9b0b8a1">[email protected]</span></a> if you have any questions.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-32842 Filed 12-29-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
STATE OF LOUISIANA

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

DEVON ENERGY PRODUCTION NO. 2022 CW 0349

COMPANY, L. P. 

VERSUS

LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF

NATURAL RESOURCES AND THOMAS

HARRIS, IN HIS CAPACITY AS

SECRETARY OF THE LOUISIANA

DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL

RESOURCES

JULY 05, 2022

In Re: Devon Energy Production Company, L. P., applying for

supervisory writs, 19th Judicial District Court, 

Parish of East Baton Rouge, No. 699354. 

BEFORE: McCLENDON, WELCH, AND HESTER, JJ. 

WRIT GRANTED WITH ORDER. The trial court' s March 23, 2022

ruling denying the motion for summary judgment filed by Devon

Energy Production Company, LP, is hereby vacated. When the

trial court originally issued the alternative writ of mandamus

order, the court ordered defendants to show cause why the

mandamus relief should not issue. See La. Code Civ. P. art. 

3865. Although set for a show cause hearing, the matter was

stayed. The matter is remanded and the trial court is

instructed to conduct the show cause hearing on the petition for

mandamus. 

PMC

JEW

CHH

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

EPUTY L RK OF COURT

FOR THE COURT
#### § 3700.137 Who in the Peace Corps may grant an exception to let an excluded person participate in a covered transaction?

The Director of the Peace Corps has the authority to grant an exception to let an excluded person participate in a covered transaction, as provided in the OMB guidance at 2 CFR 180.135.
§ 710.30 Action by the Secretary. ( a ) Whenever an individual has not been afforded an opportunity to cross-examine witnesses who have furnished information adverse to the individual under the provisions of §§ 710.26(l) or (o), the Secretary may issue a final decision to deny or revoke access authorization for the individual after personally reviewing the administrative record and any additional material provided by the Chair. The Secretary's authority may, in accordance with applicable provisions of Executive Order 12968, be delegated to the Deputy Secretary where the effected individual is a Federal employee. The Secretary's authority, in accordance with applicable provisions of Executive Order 10865, may not be delegated where the effected individual is a contractor employee. This authority may be exercised only when the Secretary determines that the circumstances described in § 710.26(l) or (o) are present, and such determination shall be final and not subject to review or appeal.
( b ) Whenever the Secretary issues a final decision as to an individual's access authorization eligibility, the individual and other concerned parties shall be notified in writing by the Chair of that decision and of the Secretary's findings with respect to each instance of derogatory information contained in the notification letter and each substantial issue identified in the statement in support of the request for review to the extent allowed by the national security.
( c ) Nothing contained in these procedures shall be deemed to limit or affect the responsibility and powers of the Secretary to issue subpoenas or to deny or revoke access to classified matter or special nuclear material.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

R.F., a child,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D19-1244

[February 13, 2020]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Elijah H. Williams, Judge; L.T. Case No. 18002379DLA.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Patrick B. Burke, Assistant 

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and James J. Carney, 

Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

WARNER, MAY and FORST, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
[ATTORNEY LETTERHEAD]

							    ____________________, 19___

Administrator

Rural Utilities Service

United States Department of Agriculture

Washington, D.C. 20250-1500

Dear Sir:

Subject:	[insert RUS borrower's name (Borrower) and RUS designation]

		I have examined or caused to be examined by competent and trustworthy persons, such corporate records and files and such other records, indexes and files as I have deemed necessary to permit me to render the opinions expressed herein.

		I am of the opinion that:

		(a)  the Borrower has real or personal property interest(s) (including easements, rights-of-way or leases) in the counties of ______________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________ ________________, in the State(s) of ________________________;

		(b)  attached hereto and marked as "Schedule B" is a complete and accurate list of all the real property owned or leased by the Borrower, excluding easements and rights-of-way;

		(c)  the property descriptions contained in the attached exhibit marked as "Schedule B" are legally sufficient in the above specified state(s), in form and substance, for inclusion in the granting clause of a mortgage and security instrument creating a lien on such property;

		(d)  the Borrower was organized under the laws of the State of ________________ as a [corporation/cooperative/other] and its status is active;

		(e)  the Borrower is qualified to conduct business in the State(s) of _______________________________________________;

		(f)  the true and correct legal name of the Borrower is _______________________________________________________;

�

		(g)  the Borrower's corporate debt limit [set in accordance with its articles/charter/statute] is ____________;

		(h)  the execution, delivery and performance by the Borrower of loan documents [would] [would not] require the consent, permission or authorization of [the] [any] governmental authority entitled ___________________________; and

CHOOSE ONE OF THE FOLLOWING:

		(i)  the Borrower has no subsidiary.

	- OR -

		(i)  the Borrower has the following named subsidiary or subsidiaries ______________________________________________.

								Very truly yours,

Attachment(s) (Property Schedule - marked as Schedule B-Property Schedule)

�

�

�

	�page \* arabic�2�
CO STARTING

TITLEONE Arizona Public Service Four Corners Power Plant

TITLETWO Deposition on Study Area (Area-Weighted Particle Deposition-H2SO4)

MODELOPT BETA CONC TOXICS DEPOS DDEP WDEP DRYDPLT WETDPLT

AVERTIME ANNUAL

POLLUTID OTHER

RUNORNOT run

SAVEFILE save1.sv 5 save2.sv

CO FINISHED

SO STARTING

** Source Location

** Coordinates in UTM NAD83 Zone 12

** ID TYPE UTMX UTMY El

** (m) (m) (m)

LOCATION STACK4&5 POINT 725349.5 4063098.5 1631.29

**

** Source Parameters

** ID ER H T V D

** (g/s) (m) (K) (m/s) (m)

SRCPARAM STACK4&5 8.19 115.82 327.00 20.60 12.28

**

** Particle Characteristics

PARTDIAM STACK4&5 0.625 1.00 1.25 2.50 6.00 10.0 15.0

MASSFRAX STACK4&5 2.23E-01 3.52E-01 8.71E-02 2.20E-01 8.98E-02 1.44E-02 

1.36E-02

PARTDENS STACK4&5 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0

** Building Downwash **

BUILDHGT STACK4&5 37.49 37.49 0.00 0.00 0.00 37.49

BUILDHGT STACK4&5 37.49 37.49 37.49 37.49 37.49 67.97

BUILDHGT STACK4&5 67.97 37.49 37.49 37.49 37.49 37.49

BUILDHGT STACK4&5 37.49 37.49 0.00 0.00 0.00 37.49

BUILDHGT STACK4&5 37.49 37.49 37.49 37.49 37.49 37.49

BUILDHGT STACK4&5 37.49 37.49 37.49 37.49 37.49 37.49

BUILDWID STACK4&5 89.80 90.84 0.00 0.00 0.00 88.43

BUILDWID STACK4&5 90.70 90.22 86.99 81.12 72.79 65.56

BUILDWID STACK4&5 51.85 47.12 59.89 70.85 79.65 86.03

BUILDWID STACK4&5 89.80 90.84 0.00 0.00 0.00 88.43

BUILDWID STACK4&5 90.70 90.22 86.99 81.12 72.79 62.24

BUILDWID STACK4&5 49.80 47.12 59.89 70.85 79.65 86.03

BUILDLEN STACK4&5 81.12 72.79 0.00 0.00 0.00 59.89

BUILDLEN STACK4&5 70.85 79.65 86.03 89.80 90.84 98.03

BUILDLEN STACK4&5 96.09 83.47 88.43 90.70 90.22 86.99

BUILDLEN STACK4&5 81.12 72.79 0.00 0.00 0.00 59.89

BUILDLEN STACK4&5 70.85 79.65 86.03 89.80 90.84 89.11

BUILDLEN STACK4&5 84.69 83.47 88.43 90.70 90.22 86.99

XBADJ STACK4&5 -6.72 -12.99 0.00 0.00 0.00 -51.97

XBADJ STACK4&5 -67.99 -81.95 -93.42 -102.05 -107.58 -423.97

XBADJ STACK4&5 -421.04 -107.27 -106.88 -103.24 -96.46 -86.75

XBADJ STACK4&5 -74.41 -59.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 -7.93

XBADJ STACK4&5 -2.85 2.30 7.39 12.25 16.74 20.72

XBADJ STACK4&5 24.08 23.80 18.45 12.54 6.24 -0.24

YBADJ STACK4&5 57.15 62.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 62.66

YBADJ STACK4&5 57.89 51.35 43.25 33.85 23.41 21.54

YBADJ STACK4&5 -43.90 -10.81 -22.02 -32.57 -42.13 -50.40

YBADJ STACK4&5 -57.15 -62.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 -62.66

YBADJ STACK4&5 -57.89 -51.35 -43.25 -33.85 -23.41 -12.26

YBADJ STACK4&5 -0.74 10.81 22.02 32.57 42.13 50.40

SRCGROUP ALL

SO FINISHED

RE STARTING

INCLUDED StudyArea.rou
RE FINISHED

ME STARTING

** Navajo Met I onsite 10.4 m tower data

SURFFILE METI_5YBMOD.SFC

PROFFILE METI_5YBMOD.PFL

SURFDATA 23090 2006 Farmington Regional

UAIRDATA 23050 2006 Albuquerque International

PROFBASE 1646.0 METERS

ME FINISHED

OU STARTING

RECTABLE ALLAVE FIRST

MAXTABLE ALLAVE 50

PLOTFILE ANNUAL ALL ANNUAL_AREA_H2SO4_StudyArea.plt

OU FINISHED
#### § 2424.1115 When does a limited denial of participation take effect?

A limited denial of participation is effective immediately upon issuance of the notice.