alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> BD
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998             MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                               0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,527,074               1,301,431
<SECURITIES-RESALE>                                  0                       0
<SECURITIES-BORROWED>                                0                       0
<INSTRUMENTS-OWNED>                          9,478,788               8,010,821
<PP&E>                                               0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              12,005,862               9,312,252
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0                       0
<PAYABLES>                                     381,792                 102,402
<REPOS-SOLD>                                         0                       0
<SECURITIES-LOANED>                                  0                       0
<INSTRUMENTS-SOLD>                                   0                       0
<LONG-TERM>                                          0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             0                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                  11,624,070               9,209,850
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                12,005,862               9,312,252
<TRADING-REVENUE>                            1,111,751                  60,751
<INTEREST-DIVIDENDS>                           152,251                 136,708
<COMMISSIONS>                                  143,210                  42,140
<INVESTMENT-BANKING-REVENUES>                        0                       0
<FEE-REVENUE>                                        0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<COMPENSATION>                                       0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,120,702                 155,319
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   1,120,702                 155,319
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,120,702                 155,319
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    28.27                    3.61
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    28.27                    3.61
        

</TABLE>
§ 835.401 General requirements. ( a ) Monitoring of individuals and areas shall be performed to: ( 1 ) Demonstrate compliance with the regulations in this part;
( 2 ) Document radiological conditions;
( 3 ) Detect changes in radiological conditions;
( 4 ) Detect the gradual buildup of radioactive material;
( 5 ) Verify the effectiveness of engineered and administrative controls in containing radioactive material and reducing radiation exposure; and
( 6 ) Identify and control potential sources of individual exposure to radiation and/or radioactive material.
( b ) Instruments and equipment used for monitoring shall be: ( 1 ) Periodically maintained and calibrated on an established frequency;
( 2 ) Appropriate for the type(s), levels, and energies of the radiation(s) encountered;
( 3 ) Appropriate for existing environmental conditions; and
( 4 ) Routinely tested for operability.
[58 FR 65485, Dec. 14, 1993, as amended at 63 FR 59682, Nov. 4, 1998; 72 FR 31926, June 8, 2007]
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v. BOBBY LEE SEELY, Jr., AKA Bobby Seely, Jr., AKA Bobby Lee Seely

- Bey,

Defendant

- Appellant. No. 22

- 10158
D.C. No. 2:20

- cr - 00643

- DLR

- 1

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Douglas L. Rayes, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted June 26, 2023 * *
Before: CANBY, S.R. THOMAS, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges. Bobby Lee Seely, Jr. appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the 80

- month sentence imposed following his g uilty

- plea conviction for making a false statement in connection with attempting to acquire a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(a)(6). Pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

JUL 10 2023
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 22

- 10158

(1967), Seely’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are n o grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Seely the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed. Seely waived his right to appeal his c onviction and sentence. Ou r independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75, 80

- 81 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds as to the validity of the waiver

. See United
States v. Watson , 582 F.3d 974, 986

- 88 (9th Cir. 2009). We acc ordingly dismiss the appeal except as to supervised release special conditions 3 and 5 , which involve an unconstitutional delegation of authority under United States v. Nishida , 53 F.4th 1144, 1151

- 55 (9th Cir. 2022)

. In view of this decision, and the

gov ernment’s letter stating that it does not “oppose vacatur and remand of Special
Conditions #3 and #5 .

. . to permit the district court to impose the District of Arizona’s post

- Nishida conditions , ” we vacate special conditions 3 and 5 and
remand for the district court to modify them in a manner consistent with Nishida

. Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED

. DISMISSED in part; VACATED in part; and REMANDED with
instructions.
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 926 

To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to reduce the principal amount 

on loans made to STEM majors. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 7, 2017 

Mr. SOTO introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Education and the Workforce 

A BILL 

To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to reduce 

the principal amount on loans made to STEM majors. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘American Science 

5 Principal and Interest Reduction and Employment Act’’ 

6 or the ‘‘ASPIRE Act’’. 

7 SEC. 2. LOAN CANCELLATION FOR STEM MAJORS. 

8 Part D of title IV of the Higher Education Act of 

9 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1087a et seq.) is amended by adding at 

10 the end the following: 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 926 IH

1 ‘‘SEC. 460A. LOAN CANCELLATION FOR STEM MAJORS. 

2 ‘‘(a) PROGRAM AUTHORIZED.— 

3 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary shall carry 

4 out a program of canceling the obligation to repay 

5 25 percent of the outstanding balance of principal 

6 due, in accordance with paragraph (2), on any eligi7 ble Federal Direct Loan made to a borrower who re8 ceives such loan— 

9 ‘‘(A) for attendance at an undergraduate 

10 STEM program; or 

11 ‘‘(B) on behalf of a dependent student for 

12 such student to attend an undergraduate 

13 STEM program. 

14 ‘‘(2) LOAN CANCELLATION AMOUNT.—As soon 

15 as practicable after the borrower or the borrower’s 

16 dependent student graduates with an undergraduate 

17 degree or certificate from the program described in 

18 paragraph (1), the Secretary shall cancel the obliga19 tion to repay 25 percent of the balance of principal 

20 due as of the time of such cancellation, on the eligi21 ble Federal Direct Loans made to the borrower. 

22 ‘‘(b) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

23 ‘‘(1) ELIGIBLE FEDERAL DIRECT LOAN.—The 

24 term ‘eligible Federal Direct Loan’ means a Federal 

25 Direct Stafford Loan, Federal Direct PLUS Loan, 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 926 IH

1 or Federal Direct Unsubsidized Stafford Loan, or a 

2 Federal Direct Consolidation Loan. 

3 ‘‘(2) UNDERGRADUATE STEM PROGRAM OF

4 STUDY.—The term ‘undergraduate STEM program 

5 of study’ means a program of study related to 

6 science, technology, engineering, or mathematics, at 

7 an institution of higher education that leads to an 

8 undergraduate degree or certificate. 

9 ‘‘(c) CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this section shall 

10 be construed to authorize any refunding of any canceled 

11 loan.’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### § 960.3-2-2-4 The environmental assessment.

To document the process specified above, and in compliance with section 112(b)(1)(E) of the Act, an environmental assessment shall be prepared for each site proposed for nomination as suitable for characterization. Each such environmental assessment shall describe the decision process by which such site was proposed for nomination as described in the preceding six steps and shall contain or reference the evidence that supports such process according to the requirements of § 960.3-1-4-2 and appendix IV of this part. As specified in the Act, each environmental assessment shall include an evaluation of the effects of the site-characterization activities at the site on public health and safety and the environment; a discussion of alternative activities related to site characterization that may be taken to avoid such impact; and an assessment of the regional and local impacts of locating a repository at the site. The draft environmental assessment for each site proposed for nomination as suitable for characterization shall be made available by the DOE for public comment after the Secretary has notified the Governor and legislature of the State in which the site is located, and the governing body of the affected Indian tribe where such site is located, of such impending availability.
#### § 300.1 Adoption of 2 CFR Part 200.

Under the authority listed above, the Department of Health and Human Services adopts the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Guidance in 2 CFR part 200, and has codified the text, with HHS-specific amendments in 45 CFR part 75. Thus, this part gives regulatory effect to the OMB guidance and supplements the guidance as needed for the Department.
#### In the Matter of Leon A. Douglas, Appellant, v. Helen P. Douglas, Respondent.

Memorandum by the Court. Appeal from an order of the Family Court directing payment of $40 per week support to the petitioner and allowing counsel fees and disbursements. The issues argued on this appeal are in the main factual and were decided by the court who saw and heard the witnesses and we find no compelling reason to interfere with the order appealed from. Order affirmed, with costs to petitioner. Herlihy, J. P., Reynolds, Cooke and Greenblott, JJ., concur in memorandum by the court; Aulisi, J., not voting.
IV 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 523 

Expressing disapproval of any act of the President to grant to himself or 

any member of his family, including those related solely by marriage, 

a reprieve or pardon for an offense against the United States. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 14, 2017 

Ms. BASS (for herself, Mr. AL GREEN of Texas, Ms. BARRAGA ́N, Mr. BLUMENAUER, Mr. DELANEY, Mr. DESAULNIER, Mrs. DINGELL, Mr. 

GALLEGO, Mr. GUTIE ́RREZ, Ms. HANABUSA, Mr. HUFFMAN, Ms. 

JAYAPAL, Mr. KRISHNAMOORTHI, Ms. LEE, Mr. TED LIEU of California, 

Ms. LOFGREN, Mr. MCGOVERN, Mr. BRENDAN F. BOYLE of Pennsylvania, Ms. MOORE, Ms. BLUNT ROCHESTER, Mr. SHERMAN, Mr. CONYERS, Mr. CUMMINGS, Mr. RICHMOND, Ms. JACKSON LEE, Mr. PALLONE, Ms. FUDGE, Ms. ADAMS, Mr. EVANS, Mr. BISHOP of Georgia, Mr. 

BUTTERFIELD, Mr. MEEKS, Mr. JOHNSON of Georgia, Ms. KELLY of Illinois, Ms. EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON of Texas, Mrs. BEATTY, Ms. WILSON of Florida, Mr. SOTO, Mr. THOMPSON of Mississippi, Mrs. WATSON

COLEMAN, Ms. JUDY CHU of California, Mr. RASKIN, Mr. PAYNE, and 

Mr. HASTINGS) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 

the Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing disapproval of any act of the President to grant 

to himself or any member of his family, including those 

related solely by marriage, a reprieve or pardon for an 

offense against the United States. 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives dis2 approves of the President granting to himself or any memVerDate Sep 11 2014 01:58 Sep 15, 2017 Jkt 069200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\HR523.IH HR523

lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 523 IH 

1 ber of his family, including those related solely by mar2 riage, any reprieve or pardon, or any commutation of a 

3 sentence, for any offense against the United States. 

Æ 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM (A) THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE FISCAL QUARTER ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH, (B)
QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q FOR THE FISCAL QUARTER ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND
IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          15,128
<SECURITIES>                                    15,555
<RECEIVABLES>                                   69,975
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,516
<INVENTORY>                                     51,717
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               155,294
<PP&E>                                          57,227
<DEPRECIATION>                                  36,099
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 192,975
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           47,087
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           381
<OTHER-SE>                                     145,351
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   192,975
<SALES>                                        195,790
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               195,790
<CGS>                                          126,298
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  126,298
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                44,970
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,217
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 245
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 24,519
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,452
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             22,067
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    22,067
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.59
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.56
        

</TABLE>
IV 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 711 

Recognizing and honoring the 150th anniversary of the founding of the 

Sigma Alpha Epsilon Fraternity. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 7, 2006 

Mr. COSTA (for himself, Mr. GILLMOR, Mr. REGULA, Mr. HOBSON, and Mr. 

SHADEGG) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Education and the Workforce 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing and honoring the 150th anniversary of the 

founding of the Sigma Alpha Epsilon Fraternity. 

Whereas the Sigma Alpha Epsilon Fraternity was founded on 

March 9, 1856, by 8 young men at the University of Alabama in Tuscaloosa, Alabama, in order to establish a 

band of brothers; 

Whereas the founders of the fraternity believed in promoting 

the intellectual, moral, and spiritual welfare of their 

members; 

Whereas the mission of the Sigma Alpha Epsilon Fraternity 

is to promote the highest standards of friendship, scholarship, and service for its members; 


wwhite on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 711 IH 

Whereas the Sigma Alpha Epsilon Fraternity adheres to its 

creed known as ‘‘The True Gentleman’’ and lives up to 

its ideals and aspirations for conduct with fellow man; 

Whereas, for 150 years, the Sigma Alpha Epsilon Fraternity 

has played an integral role in the positive development of 

the character and education of more than 280,000 men; 

Whereas the brothers of Sigma Alpha Epsilon, being from 

different backgrounds, ethnic groups, and temperaments, 

have shared countless friendships and a common belief in 

the founding ideals of the fraternity; 

Whereas tens of thousands of Sigma Alpha Epsilon men have 

served our nation’s military and hundreds have given the 

ultimate sacrifice for our freedom; 

Whereas alumni from Sigma Alpha Epsilon serve as leaders 

in their respective fields, including government, business, 

entertainment, science, and higher education; 

Whereas the Sigma Alpha Epsilon Fraternity has 190,000 

living alumni from as many as 290 chapters at colleges 

and universities in 49 states and Canada, making it the 

largest social fraternity in the world; and 

Whereas Sigma Alpha Epsilon continues to enrich the lives 

of its members who, in turn, give back to their families, 

communities, and other service groups: Now, therefore, 

be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) recognizes and honors the 150th anniver3 sary of the founding of the Sigma Alpha Epsilon 

4 Fraternity; 


wwhite on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
3 

•HRES 711 IH 

1 (2) commends its founding fathers and all 

2 Sigma Alpha Epsilon brothers, past and present, for 

3 their bond of friendship, common ideals and beliefs, 

4 and service to community; and 

5 (3) expresses its best wishes to this most re6 spected and cherished of national fraternities for 

7 continued success and growth. 

Æ 


wwhite on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
(May 13, 1970)

#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. James C. Pearson, Appellant.

Motion to amend remittitur granted and remittitur amended by adding thereto the following: Upon the appeal herein there was presented and necessarily pássed upon a question under the Constitution of the United States, viz.: Appellant contended that the evidence at the hearing conclusively established that his plea of guilty was involuntary 'and, therefore, his rights under the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States were violated. The Appellate Division held that appellant’s constitutional rights were not violated. Herlihy, P. J., Reynolds, Staley, Jr., Greenblott and Cooke, JJ., concur. [33 A D 2d 895.]
§ 1108.2 Precedence of definitions of terms in national policy requirements. ( a ) *General.* Some portions of the DoD Grant and Agreement Regulations (DoDGARs) may use a term in relation to compliance with a national policy requirement in a statute, Executive order, or other source that defines the term differently than it is defined in subpart B of this part. For purposes of that particular national policy requirement, the definition of a term provided by the source of the requirement and any regulation specifically implementing it takes precedence over the definition in subpart B of this part. Using the definition of a term that takes precedence for each national policy requirement is therefore important when determining the applicability and effect of that requirement.
( b ) *Examples.* ( 1 ) Current portions of the DoDGARs that specifically implement national policy requirements, as described in paragraph (a) of this section, are: ( i ) A Governmentwide regulation currently codified by DoD at 32 CFR part 26, which implements the Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1988 as it applies to grants (41 U.S.C. chapter 81, as amended);
( ii ) A Government regulation currently codified by DoD at 32 CFR part 28, which implements restrictions on lobbying in 31 U.S.C. 1352;
( iii ) A DoD regulation at part 1125 of this chapter, which implements Governmentwide guidance on nonprocurement debarment and suspension (2 CFR part 180) that has bases both in statute (section 2455 of Public Law 103-355, 108 Stat. 3327) and in Executive orders 12549 and 12689; and
( iv ) Part 1122 of this chapter, which provides standard wording of terms and conditions related to a number of national policy requirements.
( 2 ) To illustrate that a term may be defined differently in conjunction with specific national policy requirements than it is in this part, the term “State” is defined differently in the drug-free workplace requirements at 32 CFR part 26, the lobbying restrictions at 32 CFR part 28, and Subpart B of this part.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

          - [Transmittal No. 10-62]

# AGENCY:

Department of Defense, Defense Security Cooperation Agency.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text of a section 36(b)(1) arms sales notification. This is published to fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Public Law 104-164 dated 21 July 1996.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. B. English, DSCA/DBO/CFM, (703) 601-3740.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The following is a copy of a letter to the Speaker of the House of Representatives, Transmittal 10-62 with attached transmittal, policy justification, and Sensitivity of Technology.

Dated: December 23, 2010.

Morgan F. Park,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

      ( print page 81994)          ( print page 81995)          ( print page 81996)          ( print page 81997)          ( print page 81998)    

BILLING CODE 5001-6-P

[FR Doc. 2010-32755 Filed 12-28-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 5001-06-C
223 So.2d 866

#### Mrs. Lillian C. STEVENS, Testamentary Executrix of the Estate of Dr. Noah S. Cutrer, Nicholas D. Oliver, Arthur C. Reuter v. STATE MINERAL BOARD, Gulf Oil Corporation Estate of William G. Helis et al.

No. 49894.

June 27, 1969.

In re: Mrs. Lillian C. Stevens, Testamentary Executrix of the Estate of Dr. Noah S. Cutrer, Nicholas D. Oliver and Arthur C. Reuter applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Plaquemines. 221 So.2d 645.

It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be notified.