alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 31.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Kevin K. Moriarty, certify that:  1.
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Del Taco Income Properties IV;2.
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  a)
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andc)
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and  5.
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function):  a)
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting. Date: May 13, 2005
    
    /s/ Kevin K. MoriartyKevin K. MoriartyDirector, Chairman andChief Executive Officer
Editorial Note on Part 180
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 180 appear at 79 FR 75879, Dec. 19, 2014.

§ 180.215 Which nonprocurement transactions are not covered transactions? The following types of nonprocurement transactions are not covered transactions: ( a ) A direct award to— ( 1 ) A foreign government or foreign governmental entity;
( 2 ) A public international organization;
( 3 ) An entity owned (in whole or in part) or controlled by a foreign government; or
( 4 ) Any other entity consisting wholly or partially of one or more foreign governments or foreign governmental entities.
( b ) A benefit to an individual as a personal entitlement without regard to the individual's present responsibility (but benefits received in an individual's business capacity are not excepted). For example, if a person receives social security benefits under the Supplemental Security Income provisions of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 1301 *et seq.,* those benefits are not covered transactions and, therefore, are not affected if the person is excluded.
( c ) Federal employment.
( d ) A transaction that a Federal agency needs to respond to a national or agency-recognized emergency or disaster.
( e ) A permit, license, certificate or similar instrument issued as a means to regulate public health, safety or the environment, unless a Federal agency specifically designates it to be a covered transaction.
( f ) An incidental benefit that results from ordinary governmental operations.
( g ) Any other transaction if— ( 1 ) The application of an exclusion to the transaction is prohibited by law; or
( 2 ) A Federal agency's regulation exempts it from coverage under this part.
( h ) Notwithstanding paragraph (a) of this section, covered transactions must include non-procurement and procurement transactions involving entities engaged in activity that contributed to or is a significant factor in a country's non-compliance with its obligations under arms control, nonproliferation or disarmament agreements or commitments with the United States. Federal awarding agencies and primary tier non-procurement recipients must not award, renew, or extend a non-procurement transaction or procurement transaction, regardless of amount or tier, with any entity listed in the System for Award Management Exclusions List on the basis of involvement in activities that violate arms control, nonproliferation or disarmament agreements or commitments with the United States, pursuant to section 1290 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017, unless the head of a Federal agency grants an exception pursuant to 2 CFR 180.135 with the concurrence of the OMB Director.
[70 FR 51865, Aug. 31, 2005, as amended at 83 FR 31038, July 3, 2018]
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATIONS**I, Keith R. Phillips, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Wellman, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect tothe period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internalcontrol over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is beingprepared;  (b) Designed such internal control over financialreporting, or caused such internal control overfinancial reporting to be designed under oursupervision, to provide reasonable assurance regardingthe reliability of financial reporting and thepreparation of financial statements for externalpurposes in accordance with generally acceptedaccounting principles;  (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented inthis report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  (d) Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors:a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.Date            November 9, 2006       By: /s/ Keith R. Phillips         Chief Financial Officer
§ 1136.500 Purpose of OAR Article V. OAR Article V addresses procedures for establishing, appealing, and collecting debts under DoD awards. It thereby: ( a ) Provides requirements for recipients paralleling those for DoD Components in the DoDGARs at 32 CFR 22.820;
( b ) Augments requirements of OAR Article IV in any case in which a claim leads to a determination that a recipient owes an amount to DoD; and
( c ) Implements OMB guidance in 2 CFR 200.345.
#### In the Matter of Alfred Tomasello, Petitioner, v. Vincent L. Tofany, as Commissioner of Motor Vehicles, Respondent.

Proceeding pursuant to article 78 of the CPLR to review and annul respondent’s determination dated .Hovember 20, 1968 revoking petitioner’s motor vehicle operator’s license because of his refusal to submit to a chemical blood test following his arrest for driving while intoxicated (Vehicle and Traffic Law, § 1194, subd. 1). Proceeding dismissed on the merits and determination confirmed, without costs. “ In our opinion, the evidence is sufficient to sustain the findings that (1) the *963police officer who arrested petitioner had reasonable grounds to believe petitioner was driving while intoxicated; (2) the arrest was properly made; and (3) petitioner was requested to and refused to submit to the test prescribed by statute ” *(Matter of Sullivan*v. *Hults,*27 A D 2d 746, 747; see, also, *Matter of Story*v. *Hults,*27 A D 2d 745, 746; cf. *Matter of Van Wormer*v. *Tofany,*28 A D 2d 941). The New York cases have appeared to give a broad meaning to the word *“*operates ”, as it is used in section 1194 (subd. 1) of the Vehicle and Traffic Law, so as to extend it to situations where, as at bar, the petitioner begins “ to manipulate the machinery of the motor for the purpose of putting the automobile into motion” *(People*v. *Domagala,*123 Misc. 757, 758; *Matter of Prudhomme*v. *Hults,*27 A D 2d 234, 236). Accordingly, we are of the opinion that it was within the respondent Commissioner’s province to accept the hearing referee’s finding that, when the arresting officer arrived at the point where petitioner’s vehicle was stopped in a lane of the highway, he was able to observe him operate the vehicle by turning the ignition key in an attempt to start the motor. Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, Rabin, Benjamin and Martuscello, JJ., concur.
§ 900.12 Environmental review. ( a ) After the Integrated Interagency Pre-Application (IIP) Process close-out meeting, and after receipt of a relevant application for a Federal authorization or permit in accordance with the final project-specific schedule, DOE and any NEPA joint lead agency selected under § 900.11 shall prepare an environmental review document for the proposed electric transmission project designed to serve the needs of all relevant Federal entities.
( b ) When preparing the environmental review document, DOE and any NEPA joint lead agency shall: ( 1 ) Consider the materials developed throughout the IIP Process; and
( 2 ) Consult with relevant Federal entities and relevant non-Federal entities.
( c ) DOE, in consultation with any NEPA joint lead agency, is expected to be responsible for: ( 1 ) Identifying, contracting with, directing, supervising, and arranging for the payment of contractors, as appropriate, to draft the environmental review document; and
( 2 ) Publishing the environmental review document and any related documents.
( d ) Each Federal entity or non-Federal entity that is responsible for issuing a separate Federal authorization for the proposed project shall: ( 1 ) Identify all information and analysis needed to make the authorization decision; and
( 2 ) Identify all alternatives that need to be included, including a preferred alternative, with respect to the authorization.
( e ) DOE and any NEPA joint lead agency, in consultation with relevant Federal entities, shall identify the full scope of alternatives for analysis, including the no action alternative.
( f ) To the maximum extent permitted under law, relevant Federal entities shall use the environmental review document as the basis for all Federal authorization decisions on the proposed project. DOE and the relevant Federal entities shall issue, except where inappropriate or inefficient, a joint decision document, which will include the determination by the Secretary of a duration for each land use authorization issued on the proposed project.
( g ) For all proposed projects, DOE shall serve as lead agency for consultation under the Endangered Species Act (50 CFR 402.07) and section 106 of the NHPA (36 CFR 800.2(a)(2)) unless the relevant Federal entities designate otherwise. DOE shall coordinate these consultation processes with the Federal agency with the most significant interest in the management of Federal lands or waters that would be traversed or affected by the proposed project or the designated lead agency.
p130365.eng

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 13-0365

Focus Ready Draft 4/18/2013

ENGINEER: Austin \ DDH

PV (kg/yr): 

SUBMITTER: LORD Corporation

USE: Adhesive component for rubber to metal bonding.

Isocyanate FGEW < 695 (Best case). The isocyanate FGEW

cannot be accurately estimated due to the unknown amount

of isocyanate reacted and the unknown amount of branching

in the polymer

OTHER USES: 

 

 

MSDS: Yes Label: Yes

Gen Eqpt: neoprene, nitrile, or rubber gloves/ safety

eyewear including safety glasses with side shields and

chemical goggles/ sufficient ventilation in patter and

volume should be provided in order to maintain air

contaminant levels below recommended exposure limits

Respirator: if occupational exposure limits are exceeded,

a NIOSH approvded supplied-air respirator is required.

Observe OSHA regulations (29 CFR 1910.134) for respirator

use

Health Effects: causes skin irritation/ may cause skin

sensitization/ causes eye irritation/ causes respiratory

tract irritation/ may cause lung damage/ may cause

respiratory sensitization

TLV/PEL:

 

 

 

 

Page 1
p130365.eng

Consumer Use: No

SAT (concerns) (04/12/2013):

Related Cases and Related Cases and Misc SAT Info:

Migration to groundwater: Negligible

PBT rating: P3B1T1 PBT for PMN: P1B1T1; for Hyd Pdt:

P3B1T1

Health: 1-2 Dermal, Inhalation

Eco: 1 No releases to Water

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 1A

NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS:

Generated by the 06/07/2005 version of ChemSTEER. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

POLLUTION PREVENTION CONSIDERATIONS:

None.

EXPOSURE-BASED REVIEW: No

Page 2
p130365.eng

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 13-0365

Manufacturing

Number of Sites/ Location: 2

LORD - Saegertown Saegertown PA 16433-1050

LORD - Indianapolis Indianapolis IN 46220-4816

Days/yr: 3

Basis: Submission states 2 sites, 500 kg/bt, 4 hr/bt, 3

bt/yr.

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY

IRER Note: The daily releases listed for any source below

may coincide with daily releases from the other sources

to the same medium

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES ESTIMATE SUMMARY

Tot. # of workers exposed via assessed routes: 6

 

Inhalation:

negligible (VP < 0.001 torr)

Dermal:

Exposure to Liquid at 39.00% concentration

High End: 6.9E+2 mg/day over 3 days/yr

Number of workers (all sites) with dermal exposure: 6

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 13-0365

Use: Adhesive Use

Number of Sites/ Location: 1

Polaris Defense (legacy Resilient Technologies) Wausau WI

Page 3
p130365.eng

54401

Days/yr: 50

Basis: Submission states 1 site, 50 d/yr.

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES ESTIMATE SUMMARY

IRER Note: The daily releases listed for any source below

may coincide with daily releases from the other sources

to the same medium.

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES ESTIMATE SUMMARY

Tot. # of workers exposed via assessed routes: 3

Basis: Submission estimates 1 worker potentially exposed.

 CEB assumes minimum default of 3 workers per site.

Inhalation:

negligible (VP < 0.001 torr)

Dermal:

Exposure to Liquid at 39.00% concentration

High End: 6.9E+2 mg/day over 50 days/yr

Number of workers (all sites) with dermal exposure: 3

Page 4
§ 3187.5 Museum eligibility and burden of proof—Who may apply. ( a ) A museum located in any of the 50 States of the United States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the United States Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, the Republic of the Marshall Islands, the Federated States of Micronesia, and the Republic of Palau may apply for a Federal award under the Act.
( b ) A public or private nonprofit agency which is responsible for the operation of a museum may, if necessary, apply on behalf of the museum.
( c ) A museum operated by a department or agency of the Federal Government is not eligible to apply.
( d ) An applicant has the burden of establishing that it is eligible for assistance under these regulations.
Case 1:06-cv-00786-MHT-CSC Document 1 Filed 09/01/2006 Page 1 of 43
Case 1:06-cv-00786-MHT-CSC Document 1 Filed 09/01/2006 Page 2 of 43
Case 1:06-cv-00786-MHT-CSC Document 1 Filed 09/01/2006 Page 3 of 43
Case 1:06-cv-00786-MHT-CSC Document 1 Filed 09/01/2006 Page 4 of 43
Case 1:06-cv-00786-MHT-CSC Document 1 Filed 09/01/2006 Page 5 of 43
Case 1:06-cv-00786-MHT-CSC Document 1 Filed 09/01/2006 Page 6 of 43
Case 1:06-cv-00786-MHT-CSC Document 1 Filed 09/01/2006 Page 7 of 43
Case 1:06-cv-00786-MHT-CSC Document 1 Filed 09/01/2006 Page 8 of 43
Case 1:06-cv-00786-MHT-CSC Document 1 Filed 09/01/2006 Page 9 of 43
Case 1:06-cv-00786-MHT-CSC Document 1 Filed 09/01/2006 Page 10 of 43
Case 1:06-cv-00786-MHT-CSC Document 1 Filed 09/01/2006 Page 11 of 43
Case 1:06-cv-00786-MHT-CSC Document 1 Filed 09/01/2006 Page 12 of 43
Case 1:06-cv-00786-MHT-CSC Document 1 Filed 09/01/2006 Page 13 of 43
Case 1:06-cv-00786-MHT-CSC Document 1 Filed 09/01/2006 Page 14 of 43
Case 1:06-cv-00786-MHT-CSC Document 1 Filed 09/01/2006 Page 15 of 43
Case 1:06-cv-00786-MHT-CSC Document 1 Filed 09/01/2006 Page 16 of 43
Case 1:06-cv-00786-MHT-CSC Document 1 Filed 09/01/2006 Page 17 of 43
Case 1:06-cv-00786-MHT-CSC Document 1 Filed 09/01/2006 Page 18 of 43
Case 1:06-cv-00786-MHT-CSC Document 1 Filed 09/01/2006 Page 19 of 43
Case 1:06-cv-00786-MHT-CSC Document 1 Filed 09/01/2006 Page 20 of 43
Case 1:06-cv-00786-MHT-CSC Document 1 Filed 09/01/2006 Page 21 of 43
Case 1:06-cv-00786-MHT-CSC Document 1 Filed 09/01/2006 Page 22 of 43
Case 1:06-cv-00786-MHT-CSC Document 1 Filed 09/01/2006 Page 23 of 43
Case 1:06-cv-00786-MHT-CSC Document 1 Filed 09/01/2006 Page 24 of 43
Case 1:06-cv-00786-MHT-CSC Document 1 Filed 09/01/2006 Page 25 of 43
Case 1:06-cv-00786-MHT-CSC Document 1 Filed 09/01/2006 Page 26 of 43
Case 1:06-cv-00786-MHT-CSC Document 1 Filed 09/01/2006 Page 27 of 43
Case 1:06-cv-00786-MHT-CSC Document 1 Filed 09/01/2006 Page 28 of 43
Case 1:06-cv-00786-MHT-CSC Document 1 Filed 09/01/2006 Page 29 of 43
Case 1:06-cv-00786-MHT-CSC Document 1 Filed 09/01/2006 Page 30 of 43
Case 1:06-cv-00786-MHT-CSC Document 1 Filed 09/01/2006 Page 31 of 43
Case 1:06-cv-00786-MHT-CSC Document 1 Filed 09/01/2006 Page 32 of 43
Case 1:06-cv-00786-MHT-CSC Document 1 Filed 09/01/2006 Page 33 of 43
Case 1:06-cv-00786-MHT-CSC Document 1 Filed 09/01/2006 Page 34 of 43
Case 1:06-cv-00786-MHT-CSC Document 1 Filed 09/01/2006 Page 35 of 43
Case 1:06-cv-00786-MHT-CSC Document 1 Filed 09/01/2006 Page 36 of 43
Case 1:06-cv-00786-MHT-CSC Document 1 Filed 09/01/2006 Page 37 of 43
Case 1:06-cv-00786-MHT-CSC Document 1 Filed 09/01/2006 Page 38 of 43
Case 1:06-cv-00786-MHT-CSC Document 1 Filed 09/01/2006 Page 39 of 43
Case 1:06-cv-00786-MHT-CSC Document 1 Filed 09/01/2006 Page 40 of 43
Case 1:06-cv-00786-MHT-CSC Document 1 Filed 09/01/2006 Page 41 of 43
Case 1:06-cv-00786-MHT-CSC Document 1 Filed 09/01/2006 Page 42 of 43
Case 1:06-cv-00786-MHT-CSC Document 1 Filed 09/01/2006 Page 43 of 43
§ 824.11 Rights of the person at the hearing. The person may: ( a ) Testify or present evidence through witnesses or by documents;
( b ) Cross-examine witnesses and rebut records or other physical evidence, except as provided in § 824.12(d);
( c ) Be present during the entire hearing, except as provided in § 824.12(d); and
( d ) Be accompanied, represented and advised by counsel of the person's choosing.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<CIK>                         0000812788
<NAME>                        JEFFREY S. WILLIAMS
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUL-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                         1,429,728
<SECURITIES>                                   7,653,768
<RECEIVABLES>                                    549,660
<ALLOWANCES>                                       3,338
<INVENTORY>                                    3,321,862                                  
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               7,707,986
<PP&E>                                         3,671,794
<DEPRECIATION>                                   982,952
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                21,008,018
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2,346,676
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                           5,515
<OTHER-SE>                                             0                                            
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  21,008,018
<SALES>                                       10,738,458
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              10,954,493
<CGS>                                          4,903,272
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  6,695,266
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               2,889,827
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1,369,400
<INCOME-TAX>                                     504,323
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              865,077
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                     865,077
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        .17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        .17
        


</TABLE>
#### PEOPLE ex rel. BRADY v. CROPSEY.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

December 31, 1914.)

.Proceeding by the People of the State of New York, on the relation of Joseph E. Brady, against James O. Cropsey, as Commissioner. II. Crone, of New York City, for relator. T. Farley, of New York City, for respondent.

No opinion. Writ dismissed, and proceeding affirmed, with §10 costs and disbursements. Order filed.