alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2



STRATEX NETWORKS, INC.



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the periodic report of Stratex Networks, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-K for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Carl A. Thomsen, Chief Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for
purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:



(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and



(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in
typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission.



|                     |  |                                       
|-------------------- |  | --------------------------------------
|Date: August 9, 2004 |  | /s/ Carl A. Thomsen                   
|                     |  | Carl A. Thomsen                       
|                     |  | Chief Financial and Accounting Officer
#### § 2429.400 What method do I use as an agency awarding official to obtain a recipient's agreement to comply with the OMB guidance?

To obtain a recipient's agreement to comply with applicable requirements in the OMB guidance at 2 CFR part 182, you must include the following term or condition in the award:

*Drug-free workplace.* You as the recipient must comply with drug-free workplace requirements in Subpart B (or Subpart C, if the recipient is an individual) of part 2429, which adopts the governmentwide implementation (2 CFR part 182) of sections 5152-5158 of the Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1988 (Pub. L. 100-690, Title V, Subtitle D; 41 U.S.C. 701-707).
§ 960.4-2-6 Dissolution. ( a ) *Qualifying condition.* The site shall be located such that any subsurface rock dissolution will not be likely to lead to radionuclide releases greater than those allowable under the requirements specified in § 960.4-1. In predicting the likelihood of dissolution within the geologic setting at a site, the DOE will consider the evidence of dissolution within that setting during the Quaternary Period, including the locations and characteristics of dissolution fronts or other dissolution features, if identified.
( b ) *Favorable condition.* No evidence that the host rock within the site was subject to significant dissolution during the Quaternary Period.
( c ) *Potentially adverse condition.* Evidence of dissolution within the geologic setting—such as breccia pipes, dissolution cavities, significant volumetric reduction of the host rock or surrounding strata, or any structural collapse—such that a hydraulic interconnection leading to a loss of waste isolation could occur.
( d ) *Disqualifying condition.* The site shall be *disqualified* if it is likely that, during the first 10,000 years after closure, active dissolution, as predicted on the basis of the geologic record, would result in a loss of waste isolation.
#### § 1401.230 Debarment.

*Debarment* means an action taken by a Federal agency to prohibit a recipient from participating in Federal Government procurement contracts and covered non-procurement transactions. A recipient so prohibited is debarred, in accordance with the Federal Acquisition Regulation for procurement contracts (48 CFR part 9, subpart 9.4) and 2 CFR part 180.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-6689
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. GRADY LASSITER, JR., Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (2:01-cr-00154-HCM) Submitted: June 26, 2008 Decided: July 3, 2008 Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Grady Lassiter, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Raymond Edward Patricco, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Grady Lassiter, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for modification or reduction of his sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Lassiter , No. 2:01-cr-00154-HCM (E.D. Va. filed Apr. 1, 2008; entered Apr. 2, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED
Exhibit 23.2





Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


The Board of Directors


VodafoneZiggo Group Holding B.V.





We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos. 333-189220, 333-189222, 333-189223, 333-189224, 333-194578, 333-194581, 333-205542 and 333-205543) on Form S-8 of Liberty Global plc of our reports dated March 27, 2019, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of VodafoneZiggo Group Holding B.V. and its subsidiaries as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, the related consolidated statements of operations, owners’ equity and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, and the related notes to the consolidated financial statements, which reports appear in the December 31, 2018 annual report on Form 10‐K/A of Liberty Global plc.


Our report dated March 27, 2019, on the consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2018, includes an emphasis-of-matter paragraph related to the Company’s change in accounting principles due to the adoption of Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers .





/s/ KPMG Accountants N.V.


Amstelveen, The Netherlands March 27, 2019
#### § 110.88 Authority of the Secretary.

The Secretary is authorized to prescribe time schedules and other procedural arrangements, when not covered by this part, and rule on related procedural requests.
RB

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 19-0683

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

LYNDSEY LALICKER,

Defendant and Appellant.

GRANT OF EXTENSION

Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 30-day extension of time, and

good cause appearing therefor, Appellee is granted an extension of time to and

including September 25, 2021, within which to prepare, serve, and file its response 

brief.

Electronically signed by:

Bowen Greenwood

Clerk of the Supreme Court

August 18 2021

08/18/2021

Case Number: DA 19-0683
§ 810.5 Interpretations. ( a ) The advice of the DOE Office of Nonproliferation and Arms Control may be requested on whether a proposed activity falls outside the scope of this part, is generally authorized under § 810.6, or requires a specific authorization under § 810.7. However, unless authorized by the Secretary in writing, no interpretation of the regulations in this part other than a written interpretation by the DOE General Counsel is binding upon DOE.
( b ) When advice is requested from the DOE Office of Nonproliferation and Arms Control, or a binding, written determination is requested from the DOE General Counsel, a response normally will be made within 30 calendar days and, if this is not feasible, an interim response will explain the reason for the delay.
( c ) The DOE Office of Nonproliferation and Arms Control may periodically publish abstracts of general or specific authorizations that may be of general interest, exclusive of proprietary business-confidential data submitted to DOE or other information protected by law from unauthorized disclosure.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

October 25, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 03-51117

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ARMANDO MARTINEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. DR-03-CR-29-1-AML

--------------------

Before GARZA, DeMOSS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Armando Martinez appeals his sentence following a guiltyplea conviction for distribution of cocaine. Martinez argues

that the district court erred in finding that he possessed a

firearm during the commission of the offense and, as a result, in

imposing a two-level enhancement pursuant to U.S.S.G.

§ 2D1.1(b)(1) and denying a safety-valve adjustment pursuant to

U.S.S.G. § 5C1.2. 
No. 03-51117

-2-

Section 2D1.1(b)(1) calls for a two-level increase in the

offense level for a drug trafficking offense “[i]f a dangerous

weapon (including a firearm) was possessed.” U.S.S.G.

§ 2D1.1(b)(1). Because the confidential informant saw, on at

least one occasion, Martinez wearing a weapon during the offense

and a weapon was found in the same location where a number of

offenses occurred, we find that the district court did not

clearly err in finding that Martinez possessed a firearm during

the commission of the offense. See United States v. Jacquinot,

258 F.3d 423, 430 (5th Cir. 2001).

Additionally, the district court’s finding that Martinez

possessed a firearm for purposes of U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1(b)(1) also

“disqualified [him] from being eligible for the ‘safety valve’

provision of U.S.S.G. § 5C1.2.” United States v. Flucas, 99 F.3d

177, 178-79 (5th Cir. 1996). Because Martinez has failed to show

that the district court erred in imposing the U.S.S.G.

§ 2D1.1(b)(1) enhancement, he consequently has also failed to

show that the district court erred in determining that he was

ineligible under U.S.S.G. § 5C1.2. See id.; Vasquez, 161 F.3d

909, 912-13 (5th Cir. 1998). 

Accordingly, the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
§ 50.46a Acceptance criteria for reactor coolant system venting systems. Each nuclear power reactor must be provided with high point vents for the reactor coolant system, for the reactor vessel head, and for other systems required to maintain adequate core cooling if the accumulation of noncondensible gases would cause the loss of function of these systems. High point vents are not required for the tubes in U-tube steam generators. Acceptable venting systems must meet the following criteria: ( a ) The high point vents must be remotely operated from the control room.
( b ) The design of the vents and associated controls, instruments and power sources must conform to appendix A and appendix B of this part.
( c ) The vent system must be designed to ensure that: ( 1 ) The vents will perform their safety functions; and
( 2 ) There would not be inadvertent or irreversible actuation of a vent.
[68 FR 54142, Sept. 16, 2003]
#### Gotel, Appellant, *v.*Gansheimer, Warden, Appellee.

[Cite as *Gotel v. Gansheimer,*116 Ohio St.3d 316, 2007-Ohio-6437.]

(No. 2007-1028

Submitted November 28, 2007

Decided December 13, 2007.)

Per Curiam.

{¶ 1} This is an appeal from a judgment dismissing a habeas corpus petition. Because the petition failed to state a viable claim, we affirm.

{¶ 2} In 2005, the Lake County Court of Common Pleas convicted appellant, Daryl L. Gotel, of robbery and sentenced him to six years in prison. Gotel had *317pleaded guilty to the indictment charge. On appeal, the court of appeals affirmed the judgment. *State v. Gotel,*Lake App. No. 2006-L-015, 2007-Ohio-888, 2007 WL 634407.

Daryl L. Gotel, pro se.

Marc Dann, Attorney General, and Diane Mallory, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

{¶ 3} In 2006, Gotel filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus to compel appellee, Lake Erie Correctional Institution Warden Rich Gansheimer, to release him from prison. Gotel claimed that the trial court had lacked jurisdiction to convict and sentence him on the robbery charge because no criminal complaint on that charge had ever been filed in the municipal court before the case was transferred to the trial court. The warden filed a Civ.R. 12(B)(6) motion to dismiss the petition for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. The court of appeals granted the motion and dismissed the petition.

{¶ 4} In his appeal as of right, Gotel claims that the court of appeals erred in dismissing his habeas corpus petition. For the following reasons, Gotel’s claim lacks merit.

{¶ 5} Any defect resulting from the alleged failure to file a criminal complaint is not cognizable in habeas corpus, because Gotel was convicted and sentenced upon his guilty plea to an indictment, and the trial court had the requisite jurisdiction to try, convict, and sentence him upon the robbery offense. *Boylen v. Bradshaw,*108 Ohio St.3d 181, 2006-Ohio-549, 842 N.E.2d 49, ¶ 5.

{¶ 6} Moreover, “ ‘[t]he manner by which an accused is charged with a crime is procedural rather than jurisdictional, and after a conviction for crimes charged in an indictment, the judgment binds the defendant for the crime for which he was convicted.’ ” *State ex rel. Nelson v. Griffin,*103 Ohio St.3d 167, 2004-Ohio-4754, 814 N.E.2d 866, ¶ 6, quoting *Orr v. Mack*(1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 429, 430, 700 N.E.2d 590.

{¶ 7} Therefore, we affirm the judgment of the court of appeals dismissing Gotel’s petition.

Judgment affirmed.

Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of AccuPoll Holding Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Craig A. Hewitt, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


January 26, 2005                           /s/ Craig A. Hewitt
                                            -----------------------------------
                                            Craig A. Hewitt
                                            Chief Financial Officer

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 921 

To provide that Executive Order 13768 (82 Fed. Reg. 8799; entitled ‘‘Enhancing Public Safety in the Interior of the United States’’), shall have 

no force or effect, to prohibit the use of Federal funds to enforce 

the Executive Order, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 7, 2017 

Ms. LOFGREN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committees on Foreign 

Affairs, and Oversight and Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 

provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To provide that Executive Order 13768 (82 Fed. Reg. 8799; 

entitled ‘‘Enhancing Public Safety in the Interior of the 

United States’’), shall have no force or effect, to prohibit 

the use of Federal funds to enforce the Executive Order, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Community Trust Act 

5 of 2017’’. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 921 IH

1 SEC. 2. EXECUTIVE ORDER TO HAVE NO FORCE OR EFFECT. 

2 Beginning on January 25, 2017, Executive Order 

3 13768 (82 Fed. Reg. 8799; entitled ‘‘Enhancing Public 

4 Safety in the Interior of the United States’’), is null and 

5 void, shall have no force or effect, and may not be imple6 mented, administered, enforced, or carried out. 

7 SEC. 3. NO FUNDS AVAILABLE. 

8 No Federal funds (including fees) made available for 

9 any fiscal year, may be used to implement, administer, en10 force, or carry out (including through the issuance of any 

11 regulations) any of the policy changes set forth in Execu12 tive Order 13768 (82 Fed. Reg. 8799; entitled ‘‘Enhanc13 ing Public Safety in the Interior of the United States’’). 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
exv10w29



 




EXHIBIT 10.29




SUMMARY SCHEDULE OF OFFICER COMPENSATION




	 	 	 	 	 
	Name	 	Principal Position	 	2006
	 	 	 	 	 
	
    
    Phillip A. Harris

    	 	
    President & Chief Executive Officer	 	
    240,000
	
    
    Barry Hollingsworth

    	 	
    Vice President, Finance & Chief Financial Officer	 	
    155,000
	
    
    Richard C.E. Durrant

    	 	
    Executive Vice President	 	
    219,937
	
    
    Joe Norwood

    	 	
    Executive Vice President	 	
    238,000
§ 200.416 Cost allocation plans and indirect cost proposals. ( a ) For states, local governments and Indian tribes, certain services, such as motor pools, computer centers, purchasing, accounting, etc., are provided to operating agencies on a centralized basis. Since Federal awards are performed within the individual operating agencies, there needs to be a process whereby these central service costs can be identified and assigned to benefitted activities on a reasonable and consistent basis. The central service cost allocation plan provides that process.
( b ) Individual operating agencies (governmental department or agency), normally charge Federal awards for indirect costs through an indirect cost rate. A separate indirect cost rate(s) proposal for each operating agency is usually necessary to claim indirect costs under Federal awards. Indirect costs include: ( 1 ) The indirect costs originating in each department or agency of the governmental unit carrying out Federal awards and
( 2 ) The costs of central governmental services distributed through the central service cost allocation plan and not otherwise treated as direct costs.
( c ) The requirements for development and submission of cost allocation plans (for central service costs and public assistance programs) and indirect cost rate proposals are contained in appendices V, VI and VII to this part.
[78 FR 78608, Dec. 26, 2013, as amended at 86 FR 10440, Feb. 22, 2021]
exv10w6



 







EXHIBIT 10.6




ASSUMPTION AGREEMENT 




July 17, 2006




     Windstream Corporation, the surviving entity of the merger of Alltel Holding Corp. with and
into Valor Communication Group, Inc., hereby acknowledges that it has succeeded to, and otherwise
expressly assumes, all of the obligations of Alltel Holding Corp. (“AHC”) under the Credit
Agreement dated as of the date hereof among AHC, as borrower, the Lenders party thereto and
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent and Collateral Agent (the “Credit Agreement”)
and each of the other Loan Documents to which AHC is a party. Terms used but not defined herein
that are defined in the Credit Agreement shall as used herein have the respective meanings assigned
thereto in such documents.



     This Assumption Agreement shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of
the State of New York.



 









 





	 	 	 
	Very truly yours,
	 
	 	 
	WINDSTREAM CORPORATION
	 
	 	 
	By:

	 	/s/ Robert G. Clancy, Jr.
	 

	 	 
	 

	 	Name: Robert G. Clancy, Jr.
	 

	 	Title: Senior Vice President — Treasurer
#### § 1201.328 Financial reporting.

Notwithstanding 2 CFR 200.328, recipients of FHWA and NHTSA financial assistance may use FHWA, NHTSA or State financial reports.

[79 FR 76049, Dec. 19, 2014. Redesignated and amended at 88 FR 12806, Mar. 1, 2023]
66235

Corrections

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

contains editorial corrections of previously

published Presidential, Rule, Proposed Rule,

and Notice documents. These corrections are

prepared by the Office of the Federal

Register. Agency prepared corrections are

issued as signed documents and appear in

the appropriate document categories

elsewhere in the issue.

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[DOCKET 49-98]

Foreign-Trade Zone 1-New York, New

York; Application for Subzone Pfizer

Inc. (Pharmaceutical Products),

Brooklyn, New York

Correction

In notice document 98-30415,

beginning on page 63451. in the issue of

Friday. November 13. 1998, make the

following correction:

On page 63454. in the second column,

in the second full paragraph, in the

sixth and seventh lines, "[60 days from

date of publication]" should read,

"January 12, 1999".

BILUNG CODE 150541-0

Office of the Secretary

Defense Intelligence Agency, Science

and Technology Advisory Board

Closed Panel Meeting

Correction

In notice document 98-30621.

Federal Register

Vol. 63. No. 230

Tuesday, December 1, 1998

Thursday, November 12. 1998. make the

following correction:

On page 63366. in the first column. in

Table 3, in the table column heading,

"Low voltage. > 1.2 kV" should read

"Low voltage. <- 1.2 kV" and "Medium

voltage. <_ 1.2 kV- should read "Medium

voltage. > 1.2 kV".

BILUNG CODE 1505-01-D

beginning on page 63916 , in the issue of

Tuesday, November 17, 1998, make the

following correction:

On page 63917, in the first column, in

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

the fourth line, under the heading Federal Aviation Administration

DATES:. "December 1998 (800 am to

1600 pm) " should read "December 3,

1998 (800 am to 1600 pm) ".

BILLING CODE 156501-0

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Office of Energy Efficiency and

Renewable Energy

10 CFR Part 432

[Docket No. EE-TP-98-550)

RiN 1904-AA85

Energy Conservation Program: Test

Procedures for Distribution

Transformers

Correction

In proposed rule document 98-30140,

beginning on page 63360, in the issue of

14 CFR Part 71

(Airspace Docket No. 98-ACE-40)

Amendment to Class E Airspace;

Pittsburg, KS

Correction

In rule document 98-30930,

appearing on page 64179. in the issue of

Thursday. November 19, 1998, make the

following correction:

On page 64179, in the third column,

the subject line is corrected to read as

set forth above.

BIWNG CODE 1505.01-D

EE-TP-98-550 COMMENT 12D