alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1138.5 Authority to omit or reserve portions of SUB Articles I through XII. A DoD Component's general terms and conditions may: ( a ) Omit SUB Articles II through XII that are the subject of this part if the DoD Component does not allow recipients to make subawards under awards using those terms and conditions. The DoD Component also may amend SUB Article I in that case, to state the prohibition on making subawards and limit the recipient's responsibility to ensuring that any transaction it awards at the next tier is a procurement transaction.
( b ) Reserve portions of SUB Articles I through XII that do not apply to the DoD Component's awards using those terms and conditions. For example, the DoD Component may reserve paragraphs in SUB Articles IV through IX specifying administrative requirements that flow down solely to subawards to States if it determines that there is no possibility of a subaward to a State under any of the awards using its general terms and conditions. Similarly, it may reserve SUB Article XII if it does not permit any fixed-amount subawards under its awards.
#### § 2424.1120 How long may a limited denial of participation last?

A limited denial of participation may remain in effect up to 12 months.
**Exhibit 32****SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**     I, Timothy D. Harris, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Komag, Incorporated onForm 10-Q for the quarterly period ended April 1, 2007 fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained insuch Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results ofoperations of Komag, Incorporated.         BY: /s/ Timothy D. Harris     Timothy D. Harris    Chief Executive Officer    Komag, Incorporated       I, Kathleen A. Bayless, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Komag, Incorporated onForm 10-Q for the quarterly period ended April 1, 2007 fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained insuch 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results ofoperations of Komag, Incorporated.         BY: /s/ Kathleen A. Bayless     Kathleen A. Bayless    Chief Financial Officer    Komag, Incorporated       This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemedfiled by Komag, Incorporated for purposes of Section 18 of the Security Exchange Act of 1934, asamended. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided toKomag, Incorporated and will be retained by Komag, Incorporated and furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 905.33 Extension formula. ( a ) The amount of power to be extended to an existing customer shall be determined according to this formula: Customer Contract Rate of Delivery (CROD) today/total project CROD under contract today × project-specific percentage × marketable resource determined to be available at the time future resource extensions begin = CROD extended.
( b ) Where contract rates of delivery vary by season, the formula shall be used on a seasonal basis to determine the extended power resource. A similar pro rata approach shall be used for energy extensions.
( c ) Determination of the amount of resource available after existing contracts expire, if significantly different from existing resource commitments, shall take place only after an appropriate public process.
( d ) The formula set forth in paragraph (a) of this section also should be used to determine the amounts of firm power subject to withdrawal at 5-year intervals after the effective date of the extension to existing customers, except that the percentage used would be up to 1 percent for each of the two withdrawal opportunities, and the formula would use the customer CROD, project CROD and the resource under contract at the time.
* Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions

that have no precedential value and merely decide particular

cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes

needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal

profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published. 

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-60049

 Conference Calendar 

__________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

DAVID EARL HUGHES,

 Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Mississippi 

USDC No. 3:94cv618BN (J91-000094(B))

- - - - - - - - - -

June 29, 1995

Before JONES, WIENER, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

David Earl Hughes has appealed the district court's

dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to vacate, set aside or

correct his sentence for escape from federal custody. Hughes

argues that he should be resentenced because his co-defendants

were treated more leniently. 
No. 9

-2-

The court declines to consider this argument because Hughes

did not raise it in the district court. See Varnado v. Lynaugh,

920 F.2d 320, 321 (5th Cir. 1991).

Hughes is hereby warned that future filings of frivolous

documents will result in the imposition of sanctions. See Smith

v. McCleod, 946 F.2d 417, 418 (5th Cir. 1991); Jackson v.

Carpenter, 921 F.2d 68, 69 (5th Cir. 1991). 

APPEAL DISMISSED.
Editorial Note on Part 180
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 180 appear at 79 FR 75879, Dec. 19, 2014.

§ 180.630 May a Federal agency impute the conduct of one person to another? For purposes of actions taken under this part, a Federal agency may impute conduct as follows: ( a ) *Conduct imputed from an individual to an organization.* A Federal agency may impute the fraudulent, criminal, or other improper conduct of any officer, director, shareholder, partner, employee, or other individual associated with an organization, to that organization when the improper conduct occurred in connection with the individual's performance of duties for or on behalf of that organization, or with the organization's knowledge, approval or acquiescence. The organization's acceptance of the benefits derived from the conduct is evidence of knowledge, approval or acquiescence.
( b ) *Conduct imputed from an organization to an individual, or between individuals.* A Federal agency may impute the fraudulent, criminal, or other improper conduct of any organization to an individual, or from one individual to another individual, if the individual to whom the improper conduct is imputed either participated in, had knowledge of, or reason to know of the improper conduct.
( c ) *Conduct imputed from one organization to another organization.* A Federal agency may impute the fraudulent, criminal, or other improper conduct of one organization to another organization when the improper conduct occurred in connection with a partnership, joint venture, joint application, association or similar arrangement, or when the organization to whom the improper conduct is imputed has the power to direct, manage, control or influence the activities of the organization responsible for the improper conduct. Acceptance of the benefits derived from the conduct is evidence of knowledge, approval or acquiescence.
IV 

House Calendar No. 196 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 877 

[Report No. 109–507] 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 5631) making appropriations 

for the Department of Defense for the fiscal year ending September 

30, 2007, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 19, 2006 

Mr. COLE, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; 

which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 5631) making 

appropriations for the Department of Defense for the 

fiscal year ending September 30, 2007, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this 

2 resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of 

3 rule XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee 

4 of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consider5 ation of the bill (H.R. 5631) making appropriations for 

6 the Department of Defense for the fiscal year ending SepVerDate Aug 31 2005 21:28 Jun 19, 2006 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\HR877.RH HR877

sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
2 

HRES 877 RH

1 tember 30, 2007, and for other purposes. The first reading 

2 of the bill shall be dispensed with. All points of order 

3 against consideration of the bill are waived. General de4 bate shall be confined to the bill and shall not exceed one 

5 hour equally divided and controlled by the chairman and 

6 ranking minority member of the Committee on Appropria7 tions. After general debate the bill shall be considered for 

8 amendment under the five-minute rule. All points of order 

9 against provisions in the bill for failure to comply with 

10 clause 2 of rule XXI are waived. During consideration of 

11 the bill for amendment, the Chairman of the Committee 

12 of the Whole may accord priority in recognition on the 

13 basis of whether the Member offering an amendment has 

14 caused it to be printed in the portion of the Congressional 

15 Record designated for that purpose in clause 8 of rule 

16 XVIII. Amendments so printed shall be considered as 

17 read. When the committee rises and reports the bill back 

18 to the House with a recommendation that the bill do pass, 

19 the previous question shall be considered as ordered on 

20 the bill and amendments thereto to final passage without 

21 intervening motion except one motion to recommit with 

22 or without instructions. 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS

sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
House Calendar No. 196 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 877 

[Report No. 109

–507] 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 5631) 

2007, and for other purposes. Defense for the fiscal year ending September 30, making appropriations for the Department of 

JUNE 19, 2006 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
#### King License

October 16, 1950.

*David L. Levan,*for appellant.

*Frederick J. Bertolet,*for Commonwealth.

Hess, J.,

Appellant Stewart G. King was arrested in Bucks County, Pa., on June 11, 1949, by an officer of the Pennsylvania State police, charged with exceeding the statutory speed limit of 50 miles per hour. Appellant was clocked at 60 miles per hour; the weather was clear, and the offense occurred on a four-lane highway during the daytime. The arresting officer testified that no other violations of The Vehicle Code were observed.

This case is similar in many respects to the facts of Appeal of Irvin Seltzer, September term, 1950, no. IB, and other cases wherein the court has sustained appeals and ordered operating privileges to be reinstated. One factor distinguishes this case from the cases we have just mentioned. After the arrest in question and prior to the date of the hearing, appellant was arrested and convicted near Lancaster, Pa., for failing to stop before proceeding onto a through highway, and thereby violating a “Stop” sign. In view of the fact that appellant in the recent past has twice been arrested and convicted of violations of The Vehicle Code, we cannot conclude that this case presents merely a question of appellant’s having violated a speed regulation. It falls *527into the group of cases wherein we have designated appellants as second offenders and have refused to sustain their appeals.

And now, to wit, October 16, 1950, the appeal of Stewart G. King from the order of the Secretary of Revenue suspending his operating privileges is dismissed.
Editorial Note on Part 180
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 180 appear at 79 FR 75879, Dec. 19, 2014.

§ 180.120 Do subparts A through I of this part apply to me? Portions of subparts A through I of this part (see table at § 180.100(b)) apply to you if you are a— ( a ) Person who has been, is, or may reasonably be expected to be, a participant or principal in a covered transaction;
( b ) Respondent (a person against whom a Federal agency has initiated a debarment or suspension action);
( c ) Federal agency debarring or suspending official; or
( d ) Federal agency official who is authorized to enter into covered transactions with non-Federal parties.
#### § 1600.137 Who in DFC may grant an exception to let an excluded person participate in a covered transaction?

The Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of DFC or designee may grant an exception permitting an excluded person to participate in a particular covered transaction. If the CEO of DFC or designee grants an exception, the exception must be in writing and state the reason(s) for deviating from the Governmentwide policy in Executive Order 12549.
#### § 1329.505 Who in the Department of Commerce determines that a recipient who is an individual violated the requirements of this part?

The Secretary of Commerce or designee determines that a recipient who is an individual violated the requirements of this part.
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 982 

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to allow for payments to 

States for substance abuse services furnished to inmates in public institutions, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 7, 2017 

Mr. TURNER (for himself, Ms. TSONGAS, Ms. FUDGE, Ms. KAPTUR, Ms. 

CLARK of Massachusetts, Mr. ESPAILLAT, Mr. CONYERS, and Mr. RYAN

of Ohio) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to allow 

for payments to States for substance abuse services furnished to inmates in public institutions, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘The Reforming and 

5 Expanding Access to Treatment Act’’ or the ‘‘TREAT 

6 Act’’. 


emcdonald on DSK9F6TC42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 982 IH

1 SEC. 2. PAYMENTS TO STATES UNDER MEDICAID FOR SUB2 STANCE ABUSE SERVICES FURNISHED TO IN3 MATES IN PUBLIC INSTITUTIONS. 

4 Section 1905 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 

5 1396d) is amended— 

6 (1) in subsection (a)(16)— 

7 (A) by striking ‘‘and, (B) for individuals’’ 

8 and inserting ‘‘, (B) for individuals’’; and 

9 (B) by inserting before the semicolon at 

10 the end the following: ‘‘, and (C) qualified inpa11 tient substance use disorder services (as defined 

12 in such subsection) for inmates of a public in13 stitution (as such terms are defined for pur14 poses of applying the subdivision (A) that fol15 lows paragraph (29))’’; and 

16 (2) in subsection (h), by adding at the end the 

17 following new paragraph: 

18 ‘‘(3) For purposes of subsection (a)(16)(C), the term 

19 ‘qualified inpatient substance use disorder services’ means 

20 medication or behavioral treatment administered in fur21 therance of eliminating, mitigating, treating, or curing an 

22 individual’s use or abuse of drugs or an individual’s sub23 stance abuse disorder.’’. 


emcdonald on DSK9F6TC42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 982 IH

1 SEC. 3. NO SAMSHA POLICY AGAINST SUBSTANCE ABUSE 

2 TREATMENT FOR INCARCERATED INDIVID3 UALS. 

4 The Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services 

5 Administration shall not establish, maintain, or implement 

6 any memorandum of understanding or other policy that 

7 prohibits or restricts the Administration’s provision or 

8 support of substance abuse treatment or related services 

9 for incarcerated individuals, so long as such provision or 

10 support— 

11 (1) is statutorily authorized (by provisions of 

12 law other than this section) for such type of treat13 ment or services; and 

14 (2) not statutorily prohibited or restricted with 

15 respect to incarcerated individuals. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK9F6TC42PROD with BILLS
#### § 1401.401 Whom in the DOI does a recipient who is an individual notify about a criminal drug conviction?

The DOI is not designating a central location for the receipt of these reports. Therefore you shall provide this report to every grant officer, or other designee within a bureau or office of the Department on whose grant activity the convicted employee was working.
##### 



Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION OF PRESIDENT PURSUANT TO SECURITIES
ACT RULES 13A-14 AND 15D-14 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report (report) on Form 10-Q of Del Taco Income Properties
IV;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
 Date: August 13, 2007
    /s/ Shirlene LopezShirlene LopezPresident
**Exhibit 31.1**
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Stephen E. Gorman, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Greyhound Lines,Inc. and Subsidiaries; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand have:
 a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, asof the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s boardof directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reporting whichare reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.
Date: August 16, 2004                                                          /s/ Stephen E. Gorman   Stephen E. Gorman, President and Chief    Executive Officer