alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
      32.2 Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Calgon Carbon Corporation (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Leroy
      M. Ball, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that **** to
      the
      best of my knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company for the periods
      presented therein.





/s/
                Leroy M. BallChief
                Financial OfficerAugust
                11, 2008


This
      certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
      Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
§ 1.934 What procedures apply if we determine that a waiver should be modified or revoked? ( a ) We will provide the following notifications: ( 1 ) We will notify the entity that initially requested the waiver, in writing at the address identified in its petition, if we determine that a waiver granted in response to its petition should be modified or revoked.
( 2 ) We will publish a notice of our determination that a waiver should be modified or revoked in the Federal Register. This notice will establish a public docket so that interested parties may submit written submissions on our determination.
( b ) We will consider timely written submissions submitted to the public docket from interested parties.
( c ) We will publish a notice of our decision in the Federal Register. The effective date of the decision will be the date of publication of the notice.
§ 76.62 Issuance of certificate and/or approval of compliance plan. ( a ) Upon a finding of compliance with the Commission's regulations for issuance of a certificate and/or approval of a compliance plan, the Director shall issue a written decision explaining the decision. The Director may issue a certificate of compliance covering those areas where the Corporation is in compliance with applicable Commission requirements and approve a compliance plan for the remaining areas, if any, of noncompliance. The Director may impose any appropriate terms and conditions.
( b ) The Director shall publish notice of the decision in the Federal Register.
( c ) The Corporation, or any person whose interest may be affected, may file a petition, not to exceed 30 pages, requesting review of the Director's decision. This petition must be filed with the Commission not later than 30 days after publication of the Federal Register notice. Any person described in this paragraph may file a response to any petition for review, not to exceed 30 pages, within 15 days after the filing of the petition. If the Commission does not issue a decision or take other appropriate action within 90 days after the publication of the Federal Register notice, the Director's decision remains in effect. The Commission may adopt, by order, further procedures that, in its judgment, would serve the purpose of review of the Director's decision.
( d ) The Commission may adopt, modify, or set aside the findings, conclusions, conditions, or terms in the Director's decision and will state the basis of its action in writing.
[59 FR 48960, Sept. 23, 1994, as amended at 64 FR 44650, Aug. 17, 1999]
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 826 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 826

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                         June 19, 2006.
Whereas about 42 million children participate in organized sports each year;
Whereas children participating in organized sports tend to perform better in 
        school, develop excellent interpersonal skills, and lead healthier 
        lives;
Whereas organized youth sports help children increase their self-esteem, develop 
        an appreciation of health and fitness, and become leaders within the 
        community;
Whereas organized youth sports provide for regular physical activity and help 
        combat increasing rates of childhood obesity;
Whereas the Congressional Caucus on Youth Sports was created, with great help 
        and support from the Citizenship Through Sports Alliance, Positive 
        Coaching Alliance, and National Recreation and Park Association, to 
        restore the focus in youth sports on the child's experience and 
        character development;
Whereas far too many children quit participating in youth sports at a young age, 
        many telling coaches and parents, ``It just wasn't fun anymore'';
Whereas the National Recreation and Park Association has designated July as 
        Parks and Recreation Month;
Whereas many youth sports organizations gather at local parks and recreation 
        facilities across the country; and
Whereas designating the second week in July as National Youth Sports Week would 
        raise awareness of the important physical and emotional benefits of 
        participating in youth sports and the need to promote sportsmanship 
        among players, parents, coaches, and officials: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives that a 
National Youth Sports Week should be established to promote awareness of the 
importance of youth sports and the need to restore the focus in youth sports on 
the child's experience and character development.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
#### § 2339.400 What method do I use as an agency awarding official to obtain a recipient's agreement to comply with the OMB guidance?

You must include the following term or condition in the award:

*Drug-free workplace.* You, as the recipient, must comply with drug-free workplace requirements in Subpart B, which adopts the Government-wide implementation (2 CFR part 182) of sec. 5152-5158 of the Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1988 (Pub. L. 100-690, Title V, Subtitle D; 41 U.S.C. 701-707).
#### Lee v. Harper.

*Motion to ’Dismiss Appeal.*

I. *Refusal to allow amendment.; when appeal lies, or mandamus.*— On suggestion of the death of a sole plaintiff, if the court improperly refuses to allow an amendment making him sue as a mercantile partnership, reviving and continuing the case in the name of another person as surviving partner, and improperly makes an order abating the suit, *mandamus*would be the jn'oper remedy to compel the allowance of the amendment; but no order abating and dismissing the suit having been rendered, an appeal does not lie from the overruling of the motion to amend, revive and continue.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Geneva.

Tried before the Hon. Jesse M. Carmichael.

J. E. P. Flournoy, for appellant.

W. D. Roberts, *contra.*

OLOPTON, J.

The submission of this cause is accompanied by a motion to dismiss the appeal. The suit was instituted in the name of M. G. Stoudenmire as sole plaintiff, and apparently in his individual name and capacity. The death of the plaintiff having been suggested, appellant moved to amend the proceedings and complaint, so as to read, “M. G. Stoudenmire, a mercantile partnership composed of Morgan G. Stoudenmire and Moses J. Lee,” who is the appellant, and to-*549revive and continue the cause in his name as surviving partner. The court refused the motion, but made no order abating the suit, nor any other final disposition of it. If an order improperly abating it had been made, *mandamus*would be the proper remedy to compel the .allowance of an amendment improperly *refused.*—Ex *parte S. & N. Ala. R. R.*Co., 65 Ala. 599; *The*State, *ex rel. Nabor's*Heirs, 7 Ala. 459; *Ex parte*Swan, 23 Ala. 192. No final judgment having been rendered, an appeal does not lie.

The motion to dismiss the appeal must be granted.
§ 200.470 Taxes (including Value Added Tax). ( a ) For states, local governments and Indian tribes: ( 1 ) Taxes that a governmental unit is legally required to pay are allowable, except for self-assessed taxes that disproportionately affect Federal programs or changes in tax policies that disproportionately affect Federal programs.
( 2 ) Gasoline taxes, motor vehicle fees, and other taxes that are in effect user fees for benefits provided to the Federal Government are allowable.
( 3 ) This provision does not restrict the authority of the Federal awarding agency to identify taxes where Federal participation is inappropriate. Where the identification of the amount of unallowable taxes would require an inordinate amount of effort, the cognizant agency for indirect costs may accept a reasonable approximation thereof.
( b ) For nonprofit organizations and IHEs: ( 1 ) In general, taxes which the non-Federal entity is required to pay and which are paid or accrued in accordance with GAAP, and payments made to local governments in lieu of taxes which are commensurate with the local government services received are allowable, except for: ( i ) Taxes from which exemptions are available to the non-Federal entity directly or which are available to the non-Federal entity based on an exemption afforded the Federal Government and, in the latter case, when the Federal awarding agency makes available the necessary exemption certificates,
( ii ) Special assessments on land which represent capital improvements, and
( iii ) Federal income taxes.
( 2 ) Any refund of taxes, and any payment to the non-Federal entity of interest thereon, which were allowed as Federal award costs, will be credited either as a cost reduction or cash refund, as appropriate, to the Federal Government. However, any interest actually paid or credited to an non-Federal entity incident to a refund of tax, interest, and penalty will be paid or credited to the Federal Government only to the extent that such interest accrued over the period during which the non-Federal entity has been reimbursed by the Federal Government for the taxes, interest, and penalties.
( c ) Value Added Tax (VAT) Foreign taxes charged for the purchase of goods or services that a non-Federal entity is legally required to pay in country is an allowable expense under Federal awards. Foreign tax refunds or applicable credits under Federal awards refer to receipts, or reduction of expenditures, which operate to offset or reduce expense items that are allocable to Federal awards as direct or indirect costs. To the extent that such credits accrued or received by the non-Federal entity relate to allowable cost, these costs must be credited to the Federal awarding agency either as costs or cash refunds. If the costs are credited back to the Federal award, the non-Federal entity may reduce the Federal share of costs by the amount of the foreign tax reimbursement, or where Federal award has not expired, use the foreign government tax refund for approved activities under the Federal award with prior approval of the Federal awarding agency.
#### § 2998.10 What does this part do?

This part adopts the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) guidance in subparts A through I of 2 CFR part 180, as supplemented by this part, as the Department of Labor (DOL) policies and procedures for non-procurement debarment and suspension. It thereby gives regulatory effect for DOL to the OMB guidance as supplemented by this part. This part satisfies the requirements in section 3 of Executive Order 12549, “Debarment and Suspension” (3 CFR 1986 Comp., p. 189); Executive Order 12689, “Debarment and Suspension” (3 CFR 1989 Comp., p. 235); and section 2455 of the Federal Acquisition Streamlining Act of 1994, 103 (31 U.S.C. 6101 note).
#### §§ 1402.316-1402.328 [Reserved]
Register* and learn how EFTPS 

can help you. Become an 

EFTPS Batch Provider-- 

Receive a Free EFTPS T-Shirt 

when you register.

See What’s New With...

Save time and money in making

federal tax payments for clients.

Use EFTPS.

STOP BY THE EFTPS BOOTH

*Make sure to bring your 

Taxpayer Identification Number (TIN) with you.
It’s the easiest way to make federal 

tax payments accurately.

Pay business and personal taxes---yours and your 

clients. Research has shown that taxpayers using 

EFTPS have fewer penalties than 

those using paper coupons.

Become an EFTPS Batch Provider...

• Enroll clients electronically

• Make multiple payments at one time for several clients

• Make payments for them from their financial 

institution accounts.

STOP BY THE EFTPS BOOTH

And register today!

Department of the Treasury

Internal Revenue Service

www.irs.gov

Publication 4184 (5-2003)

Catalog Number 36550H

IRS
Page 1 of 2

Burlington WA

Corporate Office

1620 S Walnut St - 98233

800.755.9295 $ 360.757.1400 Bellingham WA

Microbiology 805 Orchard Dr Ste 4 - 98225

360.671.0688 Portland OR

Microbiology/Chemistry 9150 SW Pioneer Ct Ste W- 97070

503.682.7802 QUALITY CONTROL REPORT 11-08102

Duplicate, Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicate and Confirmation Result Report Report Date: 6/22/2011

Reference Number:

SAMPLE DEPENDENT

Duplicate

Duplicate QC

Batch Sample Analyte Result Result Units %RPD Limits Qualifier Type Comments

6020_110613

 17643 BERYLLIUM 0.09 0.11 mg/Kg 20.0 0-20 DUP

 17643 ARSENIC 25 26 mg/Kg 3.9 0-50 DUP

 17643 CADMIUM 2.2 2.1 mg/Kg 4.7 0-50 DUP

 17643 MANGANESE 0.7 0.7 mg/Kg 0.0 0-50 DUP

 17643 NICKEL 150 153 mg/Kg 2.0 0-50 DUP

 17643 LEAD 13 13 mg/Kg 0.0 0-50 DUP

 17643 ANTIMONY 0.9 0.9 mg/Kg 0.0 0-50 DUP

 17643 COBALT 1.2 1.2 mg/Kg 0.0 0-20 DUP

Matrix Spike (MS)/Matrix Spike Duplicate (MSD) analyses are used to determine the accuracy (MS) and precision (MSD) of a analytical method in a given sample matrix. Therefore, the usefulness of this report is limited to samples of 

similar matrices analyzed in the same analytical batch.

NA = Indicates %RPD could not be calculated

%RPD = Relative Percent Difference

Only Duplicate sample with detections are listed in this report
Page 2 of 2

Reference Number: 11-08102

Report Date: 6/22/2011

Matrix Spike Duplicate

Spike Spike Spike Percent Recovery QC

Batch Sample Analyte Result Result Result Conc Units MS MSD Limits %RPD Limits Qualifier Type Comments

6020_110613

 17643 BERYLLIUM 0.09 96 100 mg/Kg 96 70-130 NA 0-50 LFM

 17643 ARSENIC 25 124 100 mg/Kg 99 70-130 NA 0-50 LFM

 17643 CADMIUM 2.2 98.9 100 mg/Kg 97 70-130 NA 0-50 LFM

 17643 CHROMIUM ND 94.7 100 mg/Kg 95 70-130 NA 0-50 LFM

 17643 MANGANESE 0.7 112 100 mg/Kg 111 70-130 NA 0-50 LFM

 17643 NICKEL 150 269 100 mg/Kg 119 70-130 NA 0-50 LFM

 17643 LEAD 13 84.2 100 mg/Kg 71 70-130 NA 0-50 LFM

 17643 SELENIUM ND 101 100 mg/Kg 101 70-130 NA 0-50 LFM

 17643 ANTIMONY 0.9 100 100 mg/Kg 99 70-130 NA 0-50 LFM

 17643 COBALT 1.2 118 100 mg/Kg 117 70-130 NA 0-50 LFM

Matrix Spike (MS)/Matrix Spike Duplicate (MSD) analyses are used to determine the accuracy (MS) and precision (MSD) of a analytical method in a given sample matrix. Therefore, the usefulness of this report is limited to samples of 

similar matrices analyzed in the same analytical batch.

NA = Indicates %RPD could not be calculated

%RPD = Relative Percent Difference

Only Duplicate sample with detections are listed in this report
§ 1532.1400 How may I appeal a decision denying my request for reinstatement? ( a ) If the EPA debarring official denies your request for reinstatement under the CAA or CWA, you can ask for review of the debarring official's decision in two ways: ( 1 ) You may ask the debarring official to reconsider the decision for material errors of fact or law that you believe will change the outcome of the matter; and/ or
( 2 ) You may request the Director, Office of Grants and Debarment (OGD Director), to review the debarring official's denial within 30 days of your receipt of the debarring official's decision under § 1532.1230 or paragraph (a)(1) of this section. However, the OGD Director can reverse the debarring official's decision denying reinstatement only where the OGD Director finds that there is a clear error of material fact or law, or where the OGD Director finds that the debarring official's decision was arbitrary, capricious, or an abuse of discretion.
( b ) A request for review under this section must be in writing and state the specific findings you believe to be in error and include the reasons or legal bases for your position.
( c ) A review under this section is solely within the discretion of the OGD Director.
( d ) The OGD Director must notify you of his or her decision under this section, in writing, using the notice procedures at 2 CFR 180.615 and 180.975.
#### § 1500.9 Revision of budget and program plans.

*Pre-award Costs.* EPA award recipients may incur allowable project costs 90 calendar days before the Federal awarding agency makes the Federal award. Expenses more than 90 calendar days pre-award require prior approval of EPA. All costs incurred before EPA makes the award are at the recipient's risk. EPA is under no obligation to reimburse such costs if for any reason the recipient does not receive a Federal award or if the Federal award is less than anticipated and inadequate to cover such costs.

[79 FR 76050, Dec. 19, 2014. Redesignated at 85 FR 61573, Sept. 30, 2020]
#### § 961.1 Purpose.

This part establishes the contractual terms and conditions under which the Department of Energy (DOE) will make available nuclear waste disposal services to the owners and generators of spent nuclear fuel (SNF) and high-level radioactive waste (HLW) as provided in section 302 of the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982 (Pub. L. 97-425). Under the contract set forth in § 961.11 of this part, DOE will take title to, transport, and dispose of spent nuclear fuel and/or high-level radioactive waste delivered to DOE by those owners or generators of such fuel or waste who execute the contract. In addition, the contract will specify the fees owners and generators of SNF and/or HLW will pay for these services. All receipts, proceeds, and revenues realized by DOE under the contract will be deposited in the Nuclear Waste Fund, an account established by the Act in the U.S. Treasury. This fund will pay for DOE's radioactive waste disposal activities, the full costs of which will be borne by the owners and generators under contract with DOE for disposal services.
#### § 3255.1 Adoption of 2 CFR Part 200.

Under the authority listed above, the National Endowment for the Arts (NEA) adopts the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Guidance in 2 CFR part 200. Thus, this part gives regulatory effect to the OMB guidance and supplements the guidance as needed for the NEA.
IV 

House Calendar No. 175 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 810 

[Report No. 109–460] 

Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to 

consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on Rules. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 10, 2006 

Mr. PUTNAM, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; 

which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

RESOLUTION 

Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with 

respect to consideration of certain resolutions reported 

from the Committee on Rules. 

1 Resolved, That the requirement of clause 6(a) of rule 

2 XIII for a two-thirds vote to consider a report from the 

3 Committee on Rules on the same day it is presented to 

4 the House is waived with respect to any resolution re5 ported on the legislative day of May 11, 2006, providing 

6 for consideration of the concurrent resolution (H. Con. 

7 Res. 376) establishing the congressional budget for the 


rfake on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
2 

HRES 810 RH

1 United States Government for fiscal year 2007 and setting 

2 forth appropriate budgetary levels for fiscal years 2008 

3 through 2011. 


rfake on PROD1PC77 with BILLS

rfake on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
House Calendar No. 175 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 810 

[Report No. 109

–460] 

RESOLUTION 

Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII 

tions reported from the Committee on Rules. with respect to consideration of certain resoluMAY 10, 2006 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 


rfake on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
#### § 780.930 Debarring Official (Agency for International Development supplement to government-wide definition at 2 CFR 180.930).

The *Debarring Official* for USAID is the Assistant Administrator, Bureau for Management, or designee as delegated in Agency policy found in ADS 103—Delegations of Authority.

[80 FR 12916, Mar. 12, 2015]
| (logo) WELLS   

           FARGO

  | Commercial Mortgage Servicing

D1086-120, 12th Floor

550 South Tryon Street

Charlotte, NC 28202

1-800-326-1334 |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

 

Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of February 1, 2013, by and among RBS Commercial Funding Inc., as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, Certificate Administrator, Tax Administrator and Custodian, Midland Loan Services, a division of PNC Bank, National Association, as Special Servicer, Trimont Real Estate Advisors, Inc., as Trust Advisor and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates WFRBS 2013-C11 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 11.12 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1.                                    A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from January 1, 2014 through December 31, 2014 (the “Reporting Period”),  and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and

 

2.         To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

 

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 6th day of March 2015.

 

 

 

/s/ Daniel Bober

Daniel Bober

Executive Vice President

Wells Fargo Bank

 

 

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll go far |
|------------------------|------------------------------------|