alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 899 

Congratulating Kentucky on being selected to host the 2010 Fe ́de ́ration 

Equestre Internationale (FEI) Games. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 28, 2006 

Mr. LEWIS of Kentucky submitted the following resolution; which was referred 

to the Committee on International Relations 

RESOLUTION 

Congratulating Kentucky on being selected to host the 2010 

Fe ́de ́ration Equestre Internationale (FEI) Games. 

Whereas there are 320,000 horses and nearly 200,000 owners, employees, and volunteers involved in the horse industry in Kentucky, providing nearly 52,000 jobs; 

Whereas the horse industry is an approximately 

$3,500,000,000 industry in Kentucky, making it the 

largest segment of the State’s agricultural sector; 

Whereas the Fe ́de ́ration Equestre Internationale (FEI) 

Games comprise the most prestigious competition in the 

equestrian world; 

Whereas the FEI Games feature show jumping, dressage, 

eventing, driving, endurance, vaulting, reining, and paraequestrian events; 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 899 IH 

Whereas the FEI Games occur only once every 4 years, and 

2010 will mark the first time the FEI Games are held 

outside Europe; 

Whereas as many as 800 competitors representing 50 countries will attend the 2010 FEI Games; 

Whereas more than 1,000 national and international media 

outlets will televise the FEI Games in 180 countries; 

Whereas the Kentucky Horse Park is the only single venue 

in the world that can accommodate the entire FEI 

Games; and 

Whereas the FEI Games will provide significant economic 

benefit for Kentucky, with an estimated $100,000,000 in 

revenue: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives con2 gratulates Kentucky on being selected to host the 2010 

3 Fe ́de ́ration Equestre Internationale (FEI) Games. 

Æ 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
#### § 1800.339 Remedies for noncompliance.

###### Cross Reference

Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 75948, Sept. 17, 2024.

NASA reserves the ability to impose additional conditions in response to award recipient noncompliance and terminate a Federal award in accordance with 2 CFR 200.339 through 200.343 and as set forth in the GCAM.

[85 FR 71817, Nov. 12, 2020]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                      23,063,562
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  938,713
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,410,472
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            30,524,680
<PP&E>                                     199,830,902
<DEPRECIATION>                              53,266,695
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             226,072,464
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       87,872,270
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                 20,848,557
<COMMON>                                        61,954
<OTHER-SE>                                (55,947,476)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               226,072,464
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            27,359,246
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               15,474,661
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            10,277,987
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           6,076,270
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (4,469,672)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (4,469,672)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (4,469,672)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.72)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
H. Res. 379 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

June 15, 2017. 

Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall 

be in order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 2372) to 

amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to clarify the rules 

relating to veteran health insurance and eligibility for the 

premium tax credit. All points of order against consideration 

of the bill are waived. The amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on Ways and Means 

now printed in the bill shall be considered as adopted. The 

bill, as amended, shall be considered as read. All points of 

order against provisions in the bill, as amended, are waived. 

The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the 

bill, as amended, and on any further amendment thereto, to 

final passage without intervening motion except: (1) one hour 

of debate equally divided and controlled by the chair and 

ranking minority member of the Committee on Ways and 

Means; and (2) one motion to recommit with or without instructions. 
2 

•HRES 379 EH 

SEC. 2. Upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in 

order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 2579) to amend 

the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow the premium tax 

credit with respect to unsubsidized COBRA continuation coverage. All points of order against consideration of the bill are 

waived. The amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on Ways and Means now printed in the bill shall be considered as adopted. The bill, as 

amended, shall be considered as read. All points of order 

against provisions in the bill, as amended, are waived. The 

previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill, 

as amended, and on any further amendment thereto, to final 

passage without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of 

debate equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on Ways and Means; 

and (2) one motion to recommit with or without instructions. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
PNC Real Estate(Logo)
MIDLAND LOAN SERVICES








ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE


of


PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
d/b/a MIDLAND LOAN SERVICES

Pursuant to the requirements of the applicable Servicing Agreement for the transactions listed on
Schedule I hereto, the undersigned, Steven W. Smith, as Executive Vice President of Midland
Loan Services, a division of PNC Bank, National Association, hereby certifies, subject to any
limitations listed on Schedule I hereto, as of the date hereof, solely in his capacity as an officer
and not in his individual capacity, as follows:

1.

A review of the Servicer's activities during the calendar year 2014 (the "Reporting
Period") and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under the
undersigned officer's supervision; and

2.

To the best of the undersigned officer's knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer
has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout
the Reporting Period.



Dated: March 1, 2015


PNC Bank, National Association
d/b/a Midland Loan Services


/s/
Steven W. Smith

Steven W. Smith
Executive Vice President




Member of The PNC Financial Services Group
10851 Mastin Boulevard   Overland Park, Kansas 66210
800-327-8083

www.pnc.com/midland

Barclays Commercial Mortgage Securities LLC

Recipient Role

Deal Name

Series Number

Midland Role

Depositor
UBSBarclays Commercial Mortgage Trust
Series 2013C6
Master Servicer
Master and Special Servicer of the Santa Anita Mall loan under the UBSB 2013C5 PSA
#### Civetta Contracting Corp., Respondent, v. Westerly Associates, Inc., et al., Appellants.

Order entered January 7, 1969, unanimously modified on the law by vacating the judgment entered herein and substituting therefor summary judgment to plaintiff in the sum of $6,422 with interest and severing the causes of action as to the balance of plaintiff’s claim and as so modified otherwise affirmed without costs or disbursements to any party. Plaintiff sues the corporate defendants on a construction contract and the individual defendants as guarantors for the performance of the corporations. Suit is for the balance withheld on the contract price, amounting to $5,572, and $29,528.68 as extras. Special Term granted summary judgment. We agree that no issue was presented as to the balance due. As to the extras, there are issues presented as to whether these come within the terms of the contract, except as to one item amounting to $850. The order directing summary judgment is consequently modified to direct judgment for these items only, leaving the balance for the outcome of the trial. Special Term properly disposed of the motion for leave to amend the answer. All of the so-called defenses which would properly tend to defeat recovery are provable by virtue of the denials in the answer. Concur—■ -Stevens, P. J., Eager, Capozzoli, Nunez and Steuer, JJ.
# EUR-Lex - 31991R2988 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31991R2988

**Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2988/91 of 11 October 1991 amending Regulation (EEC) No 1538/91 introducing detailed rules for implementing Regulation (EEC) No 1906/90 on certain marketing standards for poultrymeat **

*
Official Journal L 284 , 12/10/1991 P. 0026 - 0026 Finnish special edition: Chapter 3 Volume 39 P. 0112 Swedish special edition: Chapter 3 Volume 39 P. 0112 *

COMMISSION REGULATION (EEC) No 2988/91 of 11 October 1991 amending Regulation (EEC) No 1538/91 introducing detailed rules for implementing Regulation (EEC) No 1906/90 on certain marketing standards for poultrymeat

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 1906/90 of 26 June 1990 on certain marketing standards for poultrymeat (1) and in particular Article 9 thereof,

Whereas Article 8 of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1538/91 (2) lays down the detailed rules for the optional classification of frozen or quick-frozen poultrymeat by weight categories; whereas the immediate application of these provisions has proved to be an impediment to imports from third countries of poultrymeat packed before the entry into force of the said Regulation; whereas application of Article 8 thereof should therefore be postponed to 1 March 1992;

Whereas the Management Committee for Poultrymeat and Eggs has not delivered an opinion within the time limit set by the Chairman,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Article 15 of Regulation (EEC) No 1538/91 is hereby replaced by the following:

'Article 15

This Regulation shall enter into force on 20 June 1991.

It shall apply from 1 July 1991.

Article 8

shall apply from 1 March 1992 in the case of imports from third countries.

However, until 31 December 1991 operators may pack products covered by this Regulation in packing material bearing indications provided for in Community or national legislation applicable before the entry into force of this Regulation. These products may then be marketed until 31 December 1992'.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities. This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 11 October 1991. For the Commission

Ray MAC SHARRY

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ No L 173, 6. 7. 1990, p. 1. (2) OJ No L 143, 7. 6. 1991, p. 11.
#### § 3369.437 What method do I use to communicate to a participant the requirements described in the OMB guidance at 2 CFR 180.435?

To communicate to a participant the requirements described in 2 CFR 180.435 of the OMB guidance, you must include a term or condition in the transaction that requires the participant's compliance with subpart C of 2 CFR part 180, as supplemented by subpart C of this part, and requires the participant to include a similar term or condition in lower-tier covered transactions.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 805 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 805

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                          May 10, 2006.
    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider the conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 4297) to provide for 
reconciliation pursuant to section 201(b) of the concurrent resolution on the 
budget for fiscal year 2006. All points of order against the conference report 
and against its consideration are waived. The conference report shall be 
considered as read.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

NELSON DOMINGUEZ-SANCHEZ,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 08-70214

Agency No. A094-337-950

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted June 29, 2010** 

Before: ALARCÓN, LEAVY, and GRABER, Circuit Judges.

Nelson Dominguez-Sanchez, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions

for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his

appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision pretermitting his application

for Temporary Protected Status. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We

FILED

JUL 26 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 08-70214

review de novo constitutional and legal questions, Iturribarria v. INS, 321 F.3d

889, 894 (9th Cir. 2003), and we deny the petition for review. 

We reject Dominguez-Sanchez’s contention that the BIA improperly entered

a removal order in the first instance. See Lolong v. Gonzales, 484 F.3d 1173, 1178

& n.2 (9th Cir. 2007) (en banc) (“[W]here the BIA reverses an IJ’s grant of relief

that, by definition, follows an initial determination by the IJ that the alien is in fact

removable, an order of deportation has already been properly entered by the IJ.”). 

We also reject Dominguez-Sanchez’s contention that the IJ violated his

statutory and constitutional right to counsel by issuing a written decision granting

him the only form of relief for which he was eligible.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
#### § 1125.937 DoD Component.

In this part, DoD Component means the Office of the Secretary of Defense, a Military Department, a Defense Agency, a DoD Field Activity, or any other organizational entity of the Department of Defense that is authorized to award or administer grants, cooperative agreements, or other nonprocurement transactions.
#### The Le Roy Hydraulic Electric and Gas Company, Appellant, *v.*Antonio Caccamise, Respondent.

*Le Boy Hydraulic El. & Gas Go.*v. *Oaccamise,*119 App. Div. 914, affirmed.

(Argued December 2, 1908;

decided December 18, 1908.)

Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered May 7, 1907, affirming a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon the report of a referee in an action to restrain a trespass on lands alleged to belong to plaintiff.

*James M. E. O'Grady*and *W. H. Foster*for appellant.

*Chester A. Van Arsdale*for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs ; no Opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Vann, Willard Bartlett and Chase, JJ.
#### § 200.412 Classification of costs.

There is no universal rule for classifying certain costs as either direct or indirect (F&A) under every accounting system. A cost may be direct with respect to some specific service or function, but indirect with respect to the Federal award or other final cost objective. Therefore, it is essential that each item of cost incurred for the same purpose be treated consistently in like circumstances either as a direct or an indirect (F&A) cost in order to avoid possible double-charging of Federal awards. Guidelines for determining direct and indirect (F&A) costs charged to Federal awards are provided in this subpart.
KENNY LEE THOMAS

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO
FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND
DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 15

- 3305

_____________________________/

Opinion filed December 21, 2016.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Jackson County

. William L. Wright , Judge

.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Lori A. Willner, Assistant Public Defender,
Tallahassee , for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Sharon S. Traxler, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

B.L. THOMAS

, WETHERELL

, and M.K. THOMAS

, J J

. , CONCUR.
IV 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 85 

Supporting the goals and ideals of ‘‘National MPS Day’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 10, 2005 

Mr. KIND (for himself, Mr. KINGSTON, Mr. MCNULTY, Mr. FOLEY, and Mr. 

DENT) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Government Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Supporting the goals and ideals of ‘‘National MPS Day’’. 

Whereas mucopolysaccharidoses and mucolipidoses (commonly known as ‘‘MPS disorders’’) are genetically determined lysosomal storage disorders that result in the inability of the body to produce certain enzymes needed to 

break down complex carbohydrates; 

Whereas in individuals with MPS disorders, complex carbohydrates are stored in virtually every cell in the body and 

progressively cause damage to the cells, affecting multiple 

systems, including the bones, heart and other internal organs, respiratory system, and central nervous system; 

Whereas the cellular damage caused by MPS disorders results in mental retardation, short stature, corneal damage, joint stiffness, loss of mobility, speech and hearing 

impairment, heart disease, hyperactivity, chronic res-
2 

•HRES 85 IH 

piratory problems, and, most importantly, drastically 

shortened life span; 

Whereas the nature of MPS disorders is usually not apparent 

at birth, and, without treatment, life expectancy is usually very short; 

Whereas the multisystemic damage that is caused by MPS 

disorders makes the disorders ideal models for many 

other degenerative genetic disorders; 

Whereas recent research developments have resulted in limited treatments for some MPS disorders, and promising 

advancements are underway in pursuit of treatments for 

additional MPS disorders; 

Whereas treatments and research advancements for MPS disorders are limited by lack of awareness about the disorders, even within the medical community; 

Whereas the development of early detection and intervention 

techniques, effective treatments, and a potential cure for 

MPS disorders can be accomplished by research, data 

collection, and information distribution; 

Whereas increased public and professional awareness and 

continued public funding will assist in the development of 

new techniques, treatments, and cures for MPS disorders, which will greatly enhance the quality of life for 

individuals with MPS disorders; 

Whereas the National MPS Society, Inc., a group ultimately 

dedicated to finding a cure for MPS disorders, has designated February 25 of each year as ‘‘National MPS 

Day’’; and 

Whereas the designation of ‘‘National MPS Day’’ provides an 

opportunity to increase public and professional awareness 

about mucopolysaccharidoses and mucolipidoses, and to 
3 

•HRES 85 IH 

encourage research for early diagnosis, effective treatments, and a potential cure for MPS disorders: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives supports 

2 the goals and ideals of ‘‘National MPS Day’’. 

Æ
NOT RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION File Name: 17a0449n.06

No. 17-1093

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

WILLIAM D. SMITH, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v. MELANY GAVULIC; HURLEY MEDICAL CENTER, Defendants-Appellees. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

BEFORE: NORRIS, SUHR HEINRICH, and GRIFFIN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM. In this employment-discrimination case, pl aintiff William Smith, former General Counsel to Hurley Medical Center, appe als the district court’s judgme nt granting summary judgment in favor of defendants Hurley and its CEO, Melany Gavulic. The cas e arises from Hurley’s Board of Managers’ decision to terminate Smith’s employment on Gavulic’s recommendation, which Smith alleges was an act of racial discrimination and retaliation for raising a complaint of racial discrimination against Gavulic. Smith’s complain t alleged four types of claims: a racial discrimination claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, a Firs t Amendment retaliation claim, and violation of Michigan’s Whistle-Blowers’ Protection Ac t, M.C.L. § 15.361 et seq., and Elliott-Larsen Civil Rights Act, M.C.L. § 37.2101 et seq. The district court granted summary judgment in

favor of defendants on each clai m, and plaintiff appealed.No. 17-1093, Smith v. Gavulic, et al.

-2- After reviewing the record, the parties’ briefs , and the applicable law, we conclude that the district court’s thorough a nd well-written opinion correctly articulates and applies the applicable law to undisputed facts and that th e issuance of a full written opinion by this court would serve no jurisprudential purpose. Accordingly, for the reasons stated in the district court’s opinion, we affirm.