alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 180
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 180 appear at 79 FR 75879, Dec. 19, 2014.

§ 180.220 Are any procurement contracts included as covered transactions? ( a ) Covered transactions under this part— ( 1 ) Do not include any procurement contracts awarded directly by a Federal agency; but
( 2 ) Do include some procurement contracts awarded by non-Federal participants in nonprocurement covered transactions.
( b ) Specifically, a contract for goods or services is a covered transaction if any of the following applies: ( 1 ) The contract is awarded by a participant in a nonprocurement transaction that is covered under § 180.210, and the amount of the contract is expected to equal or exceed $25,000.
( 2 ) The contract requires the consent of an official of a Federal agency. In that case, the contract, regardless of the amount, always is a covered transaction, and it does not matter who awarded it. For example, it could be a subcontract awarded by a contractor at a tier below a nonprocurement transaction, as shown in the appendix to this part.
( 3 ) The contract is for Federally-required audit services.
( c ) A subcontract also is a covered transaction if,— ( 1 ) It is awarded by a participant in a procurement transaction under a nonprocurement transaction of a Federal agency that extends the coverage of paragraph (b)(1) of this section to additional tiers of contracts (see the diagram in the appendix to this part showing that optional lower tier coverage); and
( 2 ) The value of the subcontract is expected to equal or exceed $25,000.
[70 FR 51865, Aug. 31, 2005, as amended at 71 FR 66432, Nov. 15, 2006]
cc: Hon. Scott N. Freeman, District Judge Frank Milford Peck Attorney General/Carson City Washoe County District Attorney/Civil Division Washoe District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA 2 (0) 1947A cilRe) ,
#### COOPER, Respondent, v. VILLAGE OF WHITEHALL, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

March 3, 1915.)

Action by Estella M. Cooper against the Village of Whitehall.

No opinion. Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs.
#### § 1532.1500 If I am reinstated, when will my name be removed from the EPLS?

If your eligibility for procurement and nonprocurement participation is restored under the CAA or CWA, whether by decision, appeal, or by administrative agreement, the EPA will remove your name and that of the violating facility from the EPLS, generally within 5 working days of your reinstatement.
EPA and California Stakeholder Pyrethroid Ecological Risk Assessment meetings : February 2015

– September 2015

February 5 , 2015

- Status update and discussion of the streamlined registration review ecological risk assessment for pyrethroids.

• California Department of Pesticide Regulation (CDPR) participants: Denise Alder and Carlos
Gutierrez

• EPA participants: Tracy Perry, Garland Waleko, Kevin Costello, Margaret Hathaway

February 9, 2015

– Discussion of the streamlined registration review ecol ogical risk assessment for pyrethroids.

• Stakeholder participants: Kelly Moran, UP3 Partnership; Dave Tamayo, CASQA; Tessa Fojut and Daniel McClure, Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board; Armand Ruby, CASQA consultant; Peter Meertens, Central Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board ; Denise Alder and Carlos Gutierrez, CDPR

• EPA participants: Tracy Perry, Patti TenBrook (Region 9), Garland Waleko, Kevin Costello, Margaret Hathaway

March 4, 2015

– EPA

- CDPR technical meeting on down the drain p art of the ecological risk assessment

.

• CDPR participants: Denise Alder, Carlos Gutierrez, David Duncan (Chief), Kean Goh, Nan Singhasemanon, Robert Budd, Yuzhou Luo, Yina Xie, Jennifer Teerlink, Ann Prichard

• EPA participants: Mah Shamim, Keith Sappington, Jose Melendez, Tracy Perry, Garland Waleko,
Ke vin Costello

September 23 , 2015

- EPA update meeting to discuss progress of the ecological risk assessment.

• Stakeholder participants: Kelly Moran, UP3 Partnership

• EPA participants: Tracy Perry, Cathryn Britton , Patti TenBrook (Region 9), Kevin Costello, Garland
Waleko
Editorial Note on Part 9
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 9 appear at 82 FR 52825, Nov. 15, 2017.

§ 9.67 Statements of disagreement. ( a ) Written “Statements of Disagreement” may be furnished by the individual within 30 calendar days of the date of receipt of the final adverse determination of the Inspector General or the Executive Director for Operations. “Statements of Disagreement” directed to the Executive Director for Operations must be sent to the Freedom of Information Act and Privacy Act Officer by an appropriate method listed in § 9.6, and should be clearly marked on the statement and on the envelope, “Privacy Act Statement of Disagreement.” “Statements of Disagreement” directed to the Inspector General must be sent to the Freedom of Information Act and Privacy Officer by an appropriate method listed in § 9.6, and should be clearly marked on the statement and on the envelope “Privacy Act Statement of Disagreement”.
( b ) The Inspector General or the Executive Director for Operations, or their designees, as appropriate, are responsible for ensuring that: ( 1 ) The “Statement of Disagreement” is included in the system or systems of records in which the disputed item of information is maintained; and
( 2 ) the original record is marked to indicate the information disputed, the existence of a “Statement of Disagreement” and the location of the “Statement of Disagreement” within the system of records.
[55 FR 33848, Aug. 17, 1990, as amended at 68 FR 58800, Oct. 10, 2003; 70 FR 34309, June 14, 2005]
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 58 (Tuesday, March 26, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 18241]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-06652]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R05-OAR-2011-0328; FRL-9792-8]

Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; 
Minnesota; Flint Hills Resources Pine Bend

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Withdrawal of direct final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Due to the receipt of an adverse comment, EPA is withdrawing 
the January 31, 2013, direct final rule approving a revision to the 
Minnesota State Implementation Plan (SIP). EPA will address the comment 
in a subsequent final action based upon the proposed rulemaking action, 
also published on January 31, 2013. EPA will not institute a second 
comment period on this action.

DATES: The direct final rule published at 78 FR 6733 on January 31, 
2013, is withdrawn as of March 26, 2013.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary Portanova, Environmental 
Engineer, Control Strategies Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-18J), 
Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, 
Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 353-5954, portanova.mary@epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: EPA is withdrawing the January 31, 2013 (78 
FR 6733), direct final rule approving a revision to the the Minnesota 
sulfur dioxide SIP for Flint Hills Resources Pine Bend, LLC, in Dakota 
County. In the direct final rule, EPA stated that if adverse comments 
were received by March 4, 2013, the rule would be withdrawn and not 
take effect. On February 5, 2013, EPA received a comment, which it 
interprets as adverse and, therefore, EPA is withdrawing the direct 
final rule. EPA will address the comment in a subsequent final action 
based upon the proposed rulemaking action, also published on January 
31, 2013 (78 FR 6783). EPA will not institute a second comment period 
on this action.

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by 
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Sulfur oxides.

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

    Dated: March 13, 2013.
Susan Hedman,
Regional Administrator, Region 5.

PART 52--[AMENDED]

    Accordingly, the amendment to 40 CFR 52.1220 published in the 
Federal Register on January 31, 2013 (78 FR 6733) on pages 6735-6736 is 
withdrawn as of March 26, 2013.

[FR Doc. 2013-06652 Filed 3-25-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, Brian E. Schaaf, certify that:

 

1.                                    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Ford Credit Auto Lease Trust 2013-A (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

 

2.                                    Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.                                    Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4.                                    I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and

 

5.                                    All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: The Bank of New York Mellon, as indenture trustee of the issuing entity, and U.S. Bank Trust National Association, as owner trustee of the issuing entity.

 
| Dated   March 19, 2015 |                                               |
|-----------------------------|----------------------------------------------------|
|                        |                                               |
|                        |                                               |
|                        | /s/   Brian E. Schaaf                              |
|                        | Brian   E. Schaaf                                  |
|                        | Vice   President and Assistant Treasurer           |
|                        | Ford   Motor Credit Company LLC, as Servicer       |
|                        | (senior   officer in charge of servicing function) |

 

----
Exhibit 35.2





2015 Annual Statement of Servicer Compliance
(Item 1123)  Pooling and Servicing Agreement (the “Pooling
and Servicing Agreement”) dated as of April 1, 2013 by and among Barclays Commercial Mortgage Securities LLC as Depositor,
Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association as Master Servicer, Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC as Special
Servicer and Park Bridge Lender Services LLC as Operating Advisor and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, Certificate Administrator,
Paying Agent and Custodian relating to the UBS-Barclays Commercial Mortgage Trust 2013-C6, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates,
Series 2013-C6 (UBS-Barclays 2013-C6 )   The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Rialto Capital Advisors,
LLC, as special servicer (the “Special Servicer”) herein certifies to the following:  1.All servicing activities and performance of such servicing activities under the Pooling and Servicing
Agreement are performed on behalf of the Special Servicer.  2.A review of the servicing activities and performance by the Special Servicer for the period of
January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2015 (the “Reporting Period”) in accordance with the Pooling and Servicing Agreement
has been conducted under my supervision.  3.To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Special Servicer has fulfilled all of
its obligations under the terms of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, in all material respects for the Reporting Period and if
there has been a failure to fulfill any such obligations in any material respect, each failure and the nature and status thereof
has been specifically identified herein.    Certified by:
    /s/ Adam Singer
    Date: March 1, 2016Adam Singer, Managing Director
Subpart 624.2—Freedom of Information Act

Parent topic: PART 624—PROTECTION OF PRIVACY AND FREEDOM OF INFORMATION

624.203 Policy.

DOS regulations implementing the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552), as amended, are

codified in Chapter 1, Department of State, Subchapter R, Access to Information, Part 171,

Availability of information and records to the public, of Title 22 of the Code of Federal Regulations

(22 CFR Part 171).
#### Armco Steel Corp., Appellant, v. Renago Construction, Inc., Respondent.

Order unanimously modified in accordance with the memorandum herein, and as so modified affirmed, -with costs to respondent. Memorandum: Pursuant to a written contract appellant agreed to perform certain work and furnish supplies necessary for the installation of sewer pipe easing in respondent's project. The agreement contained a broad arbitration clause submittting to arbitration *“*Any controversy or claim arising out of or relating to this contract ”. Upon completion of the work a dispute arose which the parties purported to settle by oral agreement. Subsequent thereto appellant *888commenced an action in the Syracuse City Court for an alleged claim of $665. Respondent answered asserting an affirmative defense and demanded a jury trial. Neither party asserted its right to arbitration. Thereafter, respondent served appellant with a notice of intention to arbitrate a claim for $43,855 resulting from appellant’s alleged negligence in performing its obligations under the original contract. Appellant’s application for a stay of arbitration on the ground of waiver was denied by Special Term and appellant was directed to proceed to arbitration; the City Court action was stayed and was ordered included with the larger claim in the arbitration proceedings. We concur with the denial of appellant’s application for a stay of arbitration of the larger claim, for the contract expressly intended “that all acts of the parties subsequent to the making of the contract which raise issues of fact or law, lie exclusively within the jurisdiction of the arbitrators” *(Matter of Lipman [Haeuser Shellac Co.],*289 N. Y. 76, 80; see, also, *Matter of Exercycle Corp. [Maratta],*9 N Y 2d 329, 336, 337). The parties, however, clearly waived their right to arbitrate the City Court claim, for their acts in connection therewith “were clearly inconsistent with the defendant’s later claim that the parties were obligated to settle their differences by arbitration ” *(Matter of Zimmerman*v. *Cohen,*236 N. Y. 15, 19). The order should be modified by striking therefrom the direction that the issues pending in City Court should be included in the arbitration proceedings. However, further proceedings in the City Court action should be stayed until the completion of the arbitration proceedings, for the resolution of the arbitrable claim may well dispose of the small City Court controversy. (Appeal from order of Onondaga Special Term, denying stay of arbitration.) Present — Goldman, P. J., Witmer, Gabrielli, Bastow and Henry, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 835 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 835

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                          May 25, 2006.
    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in order 
without intervention of any point of order to consider in the House the bill 
(H.R. 5429) to direct the Secretary of the Interior to establish and implement a 
competitive oil and gas leasing program that will result in an environmentally 
sound program for the exploration, development, and production of the oil and 
gas resources of the Coastal Plain of Alaska, and for other purposes. The bill 
shall be considered as read. The previous question shall be considered as 
ordered on the bill to final passage without intervening motion except: (1) one 
hour of debate equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking 
minority member of the Committee on Resources; and (2) one motion to recommit.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of BNP Residential Properties, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Philip S. Payne, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.







  /s/ Philip S. Payne

Philip S. Payne

Executive Vice President and

Chief Financial Officer



November 7, 2003




                                       29
<PAGE>
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 437 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 437

Of inquiry requesting the President to provide certain documents in the 
                        President's possession.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 12, 2017

  Mr. DeFazio (for himself and Mr. Johnson of Georgia) submitted the 
     following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 
                   Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Of inquiry requesting the President to provide certain documents in the 
                        President's possession.

    Resolved, That the President is requested to transmit (in a manner 
appropriate to classified information, if the President determines 
appropriate), to the House of Representatives, not later than 14 days 
after the date of the adoption of this resolution, copies of any 
document, record, memo, correspondence, or other communication in the 
possession of the Administrator of the General Services Administration 
or the Acting Administrator of such Administration, or any portion of 
any such communication, that refers or relates to the following:
            (1) Guidance or direction to the Acting Administrator or to 
        other staff of the General Services Administration regarding 
        responses to requests for information from Members of Congress 
        and Ranking Members of Committees.
            (2) Ground lease No. GS-LS-11-11307, the lease agreement 
        between the Trump Old Post Office LLC and the Government, 
        including all books, records, annual statements, monthly 
        statements, annual budgets, detailed statements of the 
        outstanding equity held by each member of the Trump Old Post 
        Office LLC leasehold mortgage agreements, mezzanine lender 
        agreements, notices, lease status reports, and claims.
            (3) Legal memoranda or opinions generated by the Government 
        related to ground lease No. GS-LS-11-11307 between the Trump 
        Old Post Office LLC and the Government.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 2900.10 Prior approval requests.

In addition to the guidance set forth in 2 CFR 200.308(c), for Federal awards from the Department of Labor, the non-Federal entity must request prior approval actions at least 30 days prior to the effective date of the requested action (see 2 CFR 200.407).

[86 FR 22108, Apr. 27, 2021]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### U.S. Customs and Border Protection

# AGENCY:

U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland Security.

# ACTION:

Notice of accreditation and approval of Inspectorate America Corporation, as a commercial gauger and laboratory.

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to 19 CFR 151.12 and 19 CFR 151.13, Inspectorate America Corporation, Bo. Encarnacion 127 Km 19.1, Tallaboa-Penuelas, PR 00624, has been approved to gauge and accredited to test petroleum and petroleum products for customs purposes, in accordance with the provisions of 19 CFR 151.12 and 19 CFR 151.13. Anyone wishing to employ this entity to conduct laboratory analyses and gauger services should request and receive written assurances from the entity that it is accredited or approved by the U.S. Customs and Border Protection to conduct the specific test or gauger service requested. Alternatively, inquires regarding the specific test or gauger service this entity is accredited or approved to perform may be directed to the U.S. Customs and Border Protection by calling (202) 344-1060. The inquiry may also be sent to                         *cbp.labhq@dhs.gov.*                         Please reference the Web site listed below for a complete listing of CBP approved gaugers and accredited laboratories.                              ( print page 7513)    

*http://cbp.gov/​xp/​cgov/​import/​operations_​support/​labs_​scientific_​svcs/​commercial_​gaugers/​.*

# DATES:

The accreditation and approval of Inspectorate America Corporation, as commercial gauger and laboratory became effective on September 15, 2009. The next triennial inspection date will be scheduled for September 2012.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Anthony Malana, Laboratories and Scientific Services, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Suite 1500N, Washington, DC 20229, 202-344-1060.

Dated: February 4, 2010.

Ira S. Reese, 

Executive Director, Laboratories and Scientific Services.

[FR Doc. 2010-3236 Filed 2-18-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9111-14-P