alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 460 

Requesting the Secretary of the Interior to recognize the rich history of 

the logging industry and the importance of lumberjack sports by adding 

the Lumberjack Bowl to the National Register of Historic Places. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 19, 2017 

Mr. DUFFY submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

RESOLUTION 

Requesting the Secretary of the Interior to recognize the 

rich history of the logging industry and the importance 

of lumberjack sports by adding the Lumberjack Bowl 

to the National Register of Historic Places. 

Whereas the Lumberjack World Championships began in 

1960 as a tribute to the rich history of the logging industry across the United States, and particularly in Wisconsin; 

Whereas the Lumberjack World Championships occur annually in Hayward, Wisconsin, the biggest small town in 

America, which is renowned for its history and beauty; 

Whereas the Lumberjack Bowl has hosted the Lumberjack 

World Championships for decades, thereby drawing economic activity in the Hayward area; 


rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 460 IH 

Whereas hundreds of volunteers from Sawyer County work 

tirelessly to make the competition a world class event for 

thousands of spectators every July; 

Whereas this year’s competition will showcase over 100 athletes across 21 unique events that demonstrate the skills, 

abilities, and grit of the old-time lumberjacks; 

Whereas lumberjack sports continue to increase in popularity, 

with loyal fans and competitors from across the globe; 

Whereas many universities across the United States have 

woodsmen or lumberjack teams that compete at the collegiate level; 

Whereas the Lumberjack Bowl was formerly a holding pond 

for the North Wisconsin Lumber Company; 

Whereas the North Wisconsin Lumber Company Office in 

Hayward, Wisconsin, was added to the National Register 

of Historic Places on May 7, 1980; 

Whereas listing on the National Register of Historic Places 

drives tourism to communities and further denotes the 

cultural significance of a structure; and 

Whereas the Lumberjack Bowl still hosts all the events for 

the Lumberjack World Championships, including men’s 

and women’s logrolling, chopping, pole climbing, boom 

running, and sawing: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) recognizes the importance of lumberjack 

3 sports to the culture and economy of Wisconsin; 

4 (2) supports the growth of lumberjack sports 

5 around the United States; and 


rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 460 IH 

1 (3) requests that the Secretary of the Interior 

2 add the Lumberjack Bowl, the site of the Lumber3 jack World Championships, to the National Register 

4 of Historic Places. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
§ 1128.310 Cost principles. ( a ) *Policy.* The set of Governmentwide cost principles applicable to a particular entity type governs the allowability of costs that may be: ( 1 ) Charged to each cost-type: ( i ) DoD grant or cooperative agreement to a recipient of that entity type;
( ii ) Subaward to a subrecipient of that entity type at any tier below a DoD grant or cooperative agreement; and
( iii ) Procurement transaction with a contractor of that entity type awarded by a recipient of a DoD grant or cooperative agreement or a subrecipient that received a subaward at any tier below that grant or cooperative agreement.
( 2 ) Considered in establishing the amount of any: ( i ) Fixed-amount subaward, at any tier under a grant or cooperative agreement, to a subrecipient of that entity type; or
( ii ) Fixed-price procurement transaction with a contractor of that entity type that is awarded by either a recipient of a DoD grant or cooperative agreement or a subrecipient that received a subaward at any tier below that grant or cooperative agreement.
( b ) *Award terms and conditions* — ( 1 ) *General.* Because almost all DoD grants and cooperative agreements are cost-type awards, appendix C includes wording for Section A of FMS Article III that specifies use of the applicable Governmentwide cost principles in the determination of the allowability of costs.
( 2 ) *Exception.* A DoD Component may reserve any paragraph of appendix C's wording for Section A of FMS Article III in its general terms and conditions if the Component is certain that no entities of the type to which the paragraph applies could be recipients of awards using those general terms and conditions or recipients of subawards or procurement transactions at any tier under those awards.
EX-10.1 FIRST AMENDMENT TO LONG TERM INCETIVE PLAN



 







Exhibit 10.1




FIRST AMENDMENT TO

AGCO CORPORATION

2006 LONG TERM INCENTIVE PLAN




(As adopted August 27, 2006)




     Pursuant to Article IX of the 2006 AGCO Long Term Incentive Plan (the “Plan”), the Plan
is amended as follows effectively immediately:



     1. Section 2.18 of the Plan is amended by deleting the first sentence thereof and replacing it
with the following:




The term “Performance Period” means with respect to an Award, a period of not less than one
year within which the Performance Measures relating to such Award are to be measured.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, up to 250,000 Performance Shares may have Performance
Periods that are less than one year.”



     2. Article IX of the Plan shall be amended by adding at the end thereof the following:




Notwithstanding the foregoing, no amendment that (i) materially increases the benefits
accruing to participants under the Plan, or (ii) materially expands the definition of
Eligible Employee shall be effective until such amendment has been approved by stockholders
of the Company.



     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment to be executed by its duly
authorized officer this 27th day of July, 2006.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	AGCO CORPORATION

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ Stephen Lupton
 	 
	 	 	Title:  Senior Vice President and 	 
	 	 	          General Counsel
227 So.2d 373

#### A. Ray TOLAR, d/b/a Tolar Plumbing & Heating v. K & G CONTRACTORS, a Partnership composed of Harry Katz and Abraham Goldfarb and the said Harry Katz and Abraham Goldfarb.

No. 50067.

Nov. 6, 1969.

In re: K & G Contractors, composed of Harry Katz and Abraham Goldfarb applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans. 214 So.2d 176; 224 So.2d 202.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal, the result is correct.
| (logo) NTS NATIONAL

TAX SEARCH, LLC | 130 S. Jefferson, Suite 300

Chicago, IL 60661

312-233-6440 |
|--------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OFCOMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION’S REGULATIONAB SERVICING CRITERIA

 

 

For the calendar year endingDecember 31, 2016, National Tax Search, LLC has been a Tax Service Vendor for **WellsFargo Bank** (the “Servicer”).

 

National Tax Search, LLC(“NTS”) is responsible for assessing compliance as of December 31,2016 and for the period from January 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016 (the“Reporting Period”) with the servicing criteria set forth in Title17, Section 229.1122(d) of the Code of Federal Regulations (the“CFR”). NTS has used the servicing criteria communicated to NTS bythe Servicer to assess compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Onlyservicing criteria 1122 (d) (l)(ii), 1122 (d)1(iv), 1122 (d)2(ii), 1122(d)2(v), 1122(d)2(vi), 1122(d)(4)(xi), and 1122(d)(4)(xii) (the “ApplicableServicing Criteria”) are applicable to the activities NTS performs withrespect to the transactions covered by this report. NTS has determined that theremaining servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122 (d) of the SEC RegulationAB are not applicable to the activities it performs with respect to thetransactions covered by this report. The transactions covered by this reportinclude all tax payments made on behalf of the Servicer using NTS’s TaxQsystem (the “Platform Transactions”).

 

NTS, as a vendor, has assessedits compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria for the Reporting Periodand has concluded that NTS has complied, in all material respects, with theApplicable Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2016 and for the ReportingPeriod with respect to the Platform Transactions taken as a whole.

 

Plante & Moran, PLLC, anindependent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation reporton the assessment of compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as ofDecember 31, 2016 and for the Reporting Period as set forth in this assertion.

 

National Tax Search, LLC, asVendor to Servicer

 

 

/s/ Lori D. Eshoo

Lori D. Eshoo, President/CEO 

January 23, 2017
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Corporate Trust Services**

  MAC R1204-010  9062 Old Annapolis Road  Columbia, MD 21045  Tel: 410 884 2000  Fax: 410 715 2380 |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

J.P. Morgan Chase CommercialMortgage Securities Corp.

383 Madison Avenue

31st Floor

New York, New York 10179

 

Re: Annual Statement ofCompliance for J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Trust 2013-C10,Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2013-C10

 

Per the Pooling and ServicingAgreement dated as of March 1, 2013 (the "Agreement"), theundersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., asCertificate Administrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies asfollows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2016 (the "ReportingPeriod"):

 

(a) A review of Wells Fargo'sactivities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under theAgreement has been made under such officer's supervision; and

 

(b) To the best of suchofficer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of itsobligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

 

February 27, 2017

 

/s/ Brian Smith

BRIAN SMITH

Vice President

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll  go far |
|------------------------|-------------------------------------|
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 33 (Friday, February 19, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 7453-7454]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-3207]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Navy


Notice of Open Meeting of the Chief of Naval Operations (CNO) 
Executive Panel

AGENCY: Department of the Navy, DoD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The CNO Executive Panel will deliberate on the findings and 
proposed recommendations of the Subcommittee on Improved Concept 
Generation Development. The matters to be discussed include: Navy's 
concept generation and concept development processes and procedures.

[[Page 7454]]


DATES: The meeting will be held on March 11, 2010, at 9 a.m. and last 
no longer than two hours.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held in the Boardroom, CNA, 4825 Mark 
Center Drive, Alexandria, VA 22311-1846. Some members of the Executive 
Panel may participate via teleconference.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Bree A. Hartlage, CNO Executive 
Panel, 4825 Mark Center Drive, Alexandria, VA 22311-1846, 703-681-4907.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Individuals or interested groups may submit 
written statements for consideration by the Chief of Naval Operations 
Executive Panel at any time or in response to the agenda of the 
scheduled meeting. All requests or statements must be submitted to the 
Designated Federal Officer at the address detailed below at least five 
days prior to the meeting to allow adequate time for consideration. 
Requests or statements will not be allowed during the meeting that is 
the subject of this notice.
    The Designated Federal Officer will review all timely submissions 
with the CNO Executive Panel Chairperson and will ensure they are 
provided to members of the CNO Executive Panel before the meeting that 
is the subject of this notice.
    Individuals desiring to listen to deliberations via teleconference 
must submit their contact information (to include email address) to Ms. 
Hartlage via the below address. There will be limited availability to 
participate via teleconference and requests will be handled on a first 
come first served basis.
    To contact the Designated Federal Officer, write to Executive 
Director, CNO Executive Panel (N00K), 4825 Mark Center Drive, 2nd 
Floor, Alexandria, VA 22311-1846.

    Dated: February 12, 2010.
A.M. Vallandingam,
Lieutenant Commander, Office of the Judge Advocate General, U.S. Navy, 
Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010-3207 Filed 2-18-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3810-FF-P
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth ___________________________

No. 02-18-00175-CV

___________________________

On Appeal from County Court at Law No. 1

Tarrant County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018-002073-1

Before Kerr, Pittman, and Birdwell, JJ.

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

BRIDGETTE LARRY, Appellant

V.

SILVIA DURAN RAMIREZ, Appellee
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT

On October 24, 2018, we notified appellant that her brief had not been filed as 

the appellate rules require. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a). We stated that we could 

dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless, within ten days, appellant filed with 

the court an appellant’s brief and an accompanying motion reasonably explaining the 

brief’s untimely filing and why an extension was needed. See Tex. R. App. P. 10.5(b),

38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b). We have gotten no response.

Because appellant has failed to file a brief even after we afforded an 

opportunity to explain the initial failure, we dismiss the appeal for want of 

prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).

Per Curiam

Delivered: December 6, 2018
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>  5

       
<S>                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                        6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                    DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                       JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                         JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                 1,662,803
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                          5,726,864 <F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                            8,554,895 <F2>
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                      17,478,312
<PP&E>                                 8,542,248
<DEPRECIATION>                         3,470,226
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                        25,372,730
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                  6,977,806
<BONDS>                                4,253,554
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                  52,501
<OTHER-SE>                            10,949,609
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>          25,372,730
<SALES>                               23,486,098
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                      23,557,194
<CGS>                                 20,268,740
<TOTAL-COSTS>                         20,268,740
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                       1,860,652
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       320,849
<INCOME-PRETAX>                        1,106,953
<INCOME-TAX>                              51,573
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                    1,055,380
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                           1,055,380
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                .21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                .16

<FN>
<F1>Accounts receivable are net of allowance of $52,000 at June 30,
    1998.
<F2>Inventories are net of reserve of $392,000 at June 30, 1998.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh

Elizabeth M. Welch,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 June 2, 2021

a0526

Order 

Clerk

June 2, 2021

162337

PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF ST CLAIR SHORES, 

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 162337

COA: 349910

Macomb CC: 2019-000135-AR

MICHAEL DORR,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 29, 2020 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

BERNSTEIN, J., would grant leave to appeal.
#### § 780.46 Communication of decision to General Counsel.

When the Board decides to issue a patent license under section 153c of the Act, the Board shall send the decision to the General Counsel and instruct the General Counsel to issue the license on terms deemed equitable by the Department and generally not less fair than those granted by the patentee or by the Department to similar licensees for comparable use.
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

|CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO                     
|----------------------------------------------
|18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

I, Orhan Karahodza, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

|(1) | the Annual Report on Form 10-KT of Medicus Homecare Inc.
      for the year ended December 31, 2014 (the "Report") fully complies with
      the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
      of 1934; and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Medicus Homecare Inc.                                                                

Dated: December 24, 2015

| | /s/Orhan Karahodza                             
| | -----------------------------------------------
| | Orhan Karahodza                                
| | President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
| | (Principal Executive Officer)                  
| | Medicus Homecare Inc.                          

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Medicus Homecare
Inc. and will be retained by Medicus Homecare Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
§ 71.7 Completeness and accuracy of information. ( a ) Information provided to the Commission by a licensee, certificate holder, or an applicant for a license or CoC; or information required by statute or by the Commission's regulations, orders, license or CoC conditions, to be maintained by the licensee or certificate holder, must be complete and accurate in all material respects.
( b ) Each licensee, certificate holder, or applicant for a license or CoC must notify the Commission of information identified by the licensee, certificate holder, or applicant for a license or CoC as having, for the regulated activity, a significant implication for public health and safety or common defense and security. A licensee, certificate holder, or an applicant for a license or CoC violates this paragraph only if the licensee, certificate holder, or applicant for a license or CoC fails to notify the Commission of information that the licensee, certificate holder, or applicant for a license or CoC has identified as having a significant implication for public health and safety or common defense and security. Notification must be provided to the Administrator of the appropriate Regional Office within 2 working days of identifying the information. This requirement is not applicable to information which is already required to be provided to the Commission by other reporting or updating requirements.
CASE ANNOUNCEMENTS

*December 20, 2007*

[Cite as *12/20/2007 Case Announcements,*2007-Ohio-6802.]

MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS

2006-2239.

#### State ex rel. Cincinnati Enquirer v. Jones-Kelley.

In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus.

It is ordered by the court, sua sponte, that this case is scheduled for oral argument on Tuesday, January 8, 2008.
#### HASTRICH, Appellant, v. PILCHER et al., Respondents.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

November 20, 1914.)

Action by William H. Hastrich, individually and as executor, etc., against Paul M. Pilcher and others.

No opinion. Motion denied, without costs. See, also, 149 N. Y. Supp. 1086.
223 So.2d 672

#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Thomas NELSON v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 49937.

June 26, 1969.

In re: Thomas Nelson applying for writ of certiorari and habeas corpus.

The application is denied. The showing made does not warrant the relief sought.
§ 820.11 Information requirements. ( a ) Any information pertaining to a nuclear activity provided to DOE by any person or maintained by any person for inspection by DOE shall be complete and accurate in all material respects.
( b ) No person involved in a DOE nuclear activity shall conceal or destroy any information concerning a violation of a DOE Nuclear Safety Requirement, a Nuclear Statute, or the Act.
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

John Edward Washington, * From the 106th District Court

 of Gaines County

 Trial Court No. 18-4903.

Vs. No. 11-19-00141-CR * January 16, 2020

The State of Texas, * Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

 (Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,

Stretcher, J., and Wright, S.C.J.,

 sitting by assignment) 

 (Willson, J., not participating)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there 

is no error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s 

opinion, the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.