14312 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 53 / Thursday, March 19, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 

EPA-APPROVED REGULATIONS AND STATUTES IN THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA SIP—Continued 

State citation Title/subject State effective 

date EPA Approval date Additional explanation 

*******

Chapter 2 General and Non-attainment Area Permits 

Section 200 ....................... General Permit Requirements .................................... 11/16/12 3/19/2015 [Insert Federal 

Register Citation].

* * * * * * * 

Section 204 ....................... Permit Requirements for Sources Affecting Non-attainment Areas.11/16/12 3/19/2015 [Insert Federal 

Register Citation].

Previous 

version of 

Section 204 

is replaced 

in its entirety 

Section 208 ....................... Plantwide Applicability Limit (PAL) Permits for Major 

Sources.

11/16/12 3/19/2015 [Insert Federal 

Register Citation].

Added 

Section 210 ....................... Notice and Comment Prior to Permit Issuance ......... 11/16/12 3/19/2015 [Insert Federal 

Register Citation].

Added 

Section 299 ....................... Definitions and Abbreviations ..................................... 11/16/12 3/19/2015 [ [Insert Federal Register Citation].

* * * * * * * 

* * * * * 

[FR Doc. 2015–06217 Filed 3–18–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Parts 52 and 70 

[EPA–R07–OAR–2015–0134; FRL–9924–44– 

Region 7] 

Approval and Promulgation of Air 

Quality Implementation Plans; State of 

Missouri; Reporting Emission Data, 

Emission Fees and Process 

Information 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Direct final rule. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) is taking direct final 

action to approve revisions to the State 

Implementation Plan (SIP) and the 

Operating Permits Program for the State 

of Missouri submitted on October 2, 

2013. These revisions remove 

definitions that were in this rule but 

have been moved to the state’s general 

definitions rule. These revisions also 

clarify the information required in 

emission reports and clarify the types 

and frequency of reports for the 

emission inventory. In addition, a 

revision to the emission fees section of 

this rule clarifies that the current 

emissions fee is only applicable for 

years 2013, 2014, and 2015 as set by 

Missouri statute. 

DATES: This direct final rule will be 

effective May 18, 2015, without further 

notice, unless EPA receives adverse 

comment by April 20, 2015. If EPA 

receives adverse comment, we will 

publish a timely withdrawal of the 

direct final rule in the Federal Register 

informing the public that the rule will 

not take effect. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R07– 

OAR–2015–0134, by one of the 

following methods: 

1. www.regulations.gov. Follow the 

on-line instructions for submitting 

comments. 

2. Email: Higbee.paula@epa.gov 

3. Mail or Hand Delivery: Paula 

Higbee, Environmental Protection 

Agency, Air Planning and Development 

Branch, 11201 Renner Boulevard, 

Lenexa, Kansas 66219. 

Instructions: Direct your comments to 

Docket ID No. EPA–R07–OAR–2015– 

0134. EPA’s policy is that all comments 

received will be included in the public 

docket without change and may be 

made available online at 

www.regulations.gov, including any 

personal information provided, unless 

the comment includes information 

claimed to be Confidential Business 

Information (CBI) or other information 

whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Do not submit through 

www.regulations.gov or email 

information that you consider to be CBI 

or otherwise protected. The 

www.regulations.gov Web site is an 

‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which 

means EPA will not know your identity 

or contact information unless you 

provide it in the body of your comment. 

If you send an email comment directly 

to EPA without going through 

www.regulations.gov, your email 

address will be automatically captured 

and included as part of the comment 

that is placed in the public docket and 

made available on the Internet. If you 

submit an electronic comment, EPA 

recommends that you include your 

name and other contact information in 

the body of your comment and with any 

disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA 

cannot read your comment due to 

technical difficulties and cannot contact 

you for clarification, EPA may not be 

able to consider your comment. 

Electronic files should avoid the use of 

special characters, any form of 

encryption, and be free of any defects or 

viruses. 

Docket: All documents in the docket 

are listed in the www.regulations.gov 

index. Although listed in the index, 

some information is not publicly 

available, i.e., CBI or other information 

whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Certain other material, such as 

copyrighted material, will be publicly 

available only in hard copy form. 

Publicly available docket materials are 

available either electronically in 

www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at 

the Environmental Protection Agency, 

Air Planning and Development Branch, 

11201 Renner Boulevard, Lenexa, 

Kansas 66219. The Regional Office’s 

official hours of business are Monday 

through Friday, 8:00 to 4:30 excluding 

legal holidays. The interested persons 

wanting to examine these documents 


Rmajette on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 53 / Thursday, March 19, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 14313 

should make an appointment with the 

office at least 24 hours in advance. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Paula Higbee, Environmental Protection 

Agency, Air Planning and Development 

Branch, 11201 Renner Boulevard, 

Lenexa, Kansas 66219 at 913–551–7028 

or by email at Higbee.paula@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Throughout this document ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ 

or ‘‘our’’ refer to EPA. This section 

provides additional information by 

addressing the following: 

I. What is being addressed in this document? 

II. Have the requirements for approval of a 

SIP revision been met? 

III. What action is EPA taking? 

I. What is being addressed in this 

document? 

EPA is taking direct final action to 

approve the SIP and Operating Permits 

Program revisions submitted by the state 

of Missouri for 10 CSR 10–6.110, 

‘‘Reporting Emission Data, Emission 

Fees, and Process Information,’’ on 

October 3, 2013. Section (2) of the rule 

is being amended to move seven 

definitions from this rule to the state’s 

general definifions rule 10 CSR 10– 

6.020 (and also the definitions for 

‘‘reportable pollutant’’ and ‘‘reporting 

threshold’’ which have been moved to 

the state’s general definitions rule but 

not yet submitted to EPA for SIP 

approval.) Section (3)(A) revised the 

emission fees section, which is 

approved under the Operating Permits 

Program only, and clarifies that the 

current emissions fee is only applicable 

for years 2013, 2014 and 2015 as set by 

Missouri statute. No changes were made 

to the emission fees in the rule. Section 

(4) of the rule is being amended to better 

reflect information required in emission 

reports and clarifies the types and 

frequencies of reports to be submitted to 

the Missouri Department of Natural 

Resources (MDNR) Air Pollution 

Control Program for the Emissions 

Inventory Questionnaire. Missouri 

clarifies the rule by providing a table 

which lists the type of installation, such 

as, any installation that is required to 

obtain an operating permit, and any 

installation with an intermediate 

operating permit or a small source. The 

table shows various installations in the 

timetable for the full emissions report 

and/or the reduced reporting form, if 

applicable. The revisons to this section 

ensure that Missouri’s rule is equivalent 

to EPA’s Federal Air Emission Reporting 

Rule. 

II. Have the requirements for approval 

of a SIP revision and operating permits 

program been met? 

The state submission has met the 

public notice requirements for SIP 

submissions in accordance with 40 CFR 

51.102. The submission also satisfied 

the completeness criteria of 40 CFR part 

51, appendix V. In addition, as 

explained above, the revision meets the 

substantive SIP requirements of the 

CAA, including section 110 and 

implementing regulations, as well as 

meeting the Title V requirements. 

MDNR received one comment from their 

Air Pollution Control program regarding 

capitalization of the term ‘‘Full 

Emissions Report’’ and the relevant term 

was corrected for rule clarity. Overall, 

these actions strengthen the Missouri 

SIP and Operating Permits program by 

providing clarifications for the regulated 

public. These revisions do not 

negatively impact air quality, nor relax 

the SIP or operating permits program. 

III. What action is EPA taking? 

We are publishing this rule without a 

prior proposed rule because we view 

this as a noncontroversial action and 

anticipate no adverse comment. 

However, in the ‘‘Proposed Rules’’ 

section of this Federal Register, we are 

publishing a separate document that 

will serve as the proposed rule to these 

SIP and Operating Permits revisions if 

adverse comments are received on this 

direct final rule. We will not institute a 

second comment period on this action. 

Any parties interested in commenting 

must do so at this time. For further 

information about commenting on this 

rule, see the ADDRESSES section of this 

document. If EPA receives adverse 

comment, we will publish a timely 

withdrawal in the Federal Register 

informing the public that this direct 

final rule will not take effect. We will 

address all public comments in any 

subsequent final rule based on the 

proposed rule. 

Statutory and Executive Order Reviews 

In this rule, EPA is finalizing 

regulatory text that includes 

incorporation by reference. In 

accordance with requirements of 1 CFR 

51.5, EPA is finalizing the incorporation 

by reference of Missouri’s rule 10 CSR 

10–6.110 described in the direct final 

amendments to 40 CFR part 52 set forth 

below. EPA has made, and will continue 

to make, these documents generally 

available electronically through 

www.regulations.gov and/or in hard 

copy at the appropriate EPA office (see 

the ADDRESSES section of this preamble 

for more information). 

Under the CAA, the Administrator is 

required to approve a SIP submission 

that complies with the provisions of the 

Act and applicable Federal regulations. 

42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). 

Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, 

EPA’s role is to approve state choices, 

provided that they meet the criteria of 

the CAA. Accordingly, this action 

merely approves state law as meeting 

Federal requirements and does not 

impose additional requirements beyond 

those imposed by state law. For that 

reason, this action: 

• Is not a significant regulatory action 

subject to review by the Office of 

Management and Budget under 

Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, 

October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, 

January 21, 2011); 

• Does not impose an information 

collection burden under the provisions 

of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); 

• Is certified as not having a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities 

under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 

U.S.C. 601 et seq.); 

• Does not contain any unfunded 

mandate or significantly or uniquely 

affect small governments, as described 

in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); 

• Does not have Federalism 

implications as specified in Executive 

Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 

1999); 

• Is not an economically significant 

regulatory action based on health or 

safety risks subject to Executive Order 

13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); 

• Is not a significant regulatory action 

subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 

28355, May 22, 2001); 

• Is not subject to requirements of 

Section 12(d) of the National 

Technology Transfer and Advancement 

Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because 

application of those requirements would 

be inconsistent with the CAA; and 

• Does not provide EPA with the 

discretionary authority to address, as 

appropriate, disproportionate human 

health or environmental effects, using 

practicable and legally permissible 

methods, under Executive Order 12898 

(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). 

The SIP is not approved to apply on 

any Indian reservation land or in any 

other area where EPA or an Indian tribe 

has demonstrated that a tribe has 

jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian 

country, the rule does not have tribal 

implications and will not impose 

substantial direct costs on tribal 

governments or preempt tribal law as 

specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 

FR 67249, November 9, 2000). 


Rmajette on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES
14314 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 53 / Thursday, March 19, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 

The Congressional Review Act, 5 

U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small 

Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides 

that before a rule may take effect, the 

agency promulgating the rule must 

submit a rule report, which includes a 

copy of the rule, to each House of the 

Congress and to the Comptroller General 

of the United States. EPA will submit a 

report containing this action and other 

required information to the U.S. Senate, 

the U.S. House of Representatives, and 

the Comptroller General of the United 

States prior to publication of the rule in 

the Federal Register. A major rule 

cannot take effect until 60 days after it 

is published in the Federal Register. 

This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as 

defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). 

Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, 

petitions for judicial review of this 

action must be filed in the United States 

Court of Appeals for the appropriate 

circuit by May 18, 2015. Filing a 

petition for reconsideration by the 

Administrator of this final rule does not 

affect the finality of this action for the 

purposes of judicial review nor does it 

extend the time within which a petition 

for judicial review may be filed, and 

shall not postpone the effectiveness of 

such rule or action. Parties with 

objections to this direct final rule are 

encouraged to file a comment in 

response to the parallel notice of 

proposed rulemaking for this action 

published in the proposed rules section 

of this Federal Register, rather than file 

an immediate petition for judicial 

review of this direct final rule, so that 

EPA can withdraw this direct final rule 

and address the comment in the 

proposed rulemaking. This action may 

not be challenged later in proceedings to 

enforce its requirements. (See section 

307(b)(2).) 

List of Subjects 

40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Carbon monoxide, 

Incorporation by reference, 

Intergovernmental relations, Lead, 

Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate 

matter, Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile 

organic compounds. 

40 CFR Part 70 

Administrative practice and 

procedure, Air pollution control, 

Intergovernmental relations, Operating 

permits, Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements. 

Dated: March 4, 2015. 

Mark J. Hague, 

Acting Regional Administrator, Region 7. 

For the reasons stated in the 

preamble, the Environmental Protection 

Agency amends 40 CFR parts 52 and 70 

as set forth below: 

PART 52—APPROVAL AND 

PROMULGATION OF 

IMPLEMENTATION PLANS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 52 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

Subpart AA—Missouri 

■ 2. In § 52.1320(c) the table is amended 

by revising the entry for 10–6.110 to 

read as follows: 

§ 52.1320 Identificaiton of Plan. 

* * * * * 

(c) * * * 

EPA-APPROVED MISSOURI REGULATIONS

Missouri 

citation Title State effective date EPA approval date Explanation 

Missouri Department of Natural Resources 

*******

Chapter 6—Air Quality Standards, Definitions, Sampling and Reference Methods, and Air Pollution Control Regulations for the State of 

Missouri 

*******

10–6.110 ....... Reporting Emission Data, Emission Fees, 

and Process Information.

10/30/13 3/19/15 [Insert Federal Register citation].Section (3)(A), Emissions Fees, has not 

been approved as part of the SIP. 

*******

* * * * * 

PART 70—STATE OPERATING PERMIT 

PROGRAMS 

■ 3. The authority citation for part 70 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401, et seq. 

■ 4. Appendix A to part 70 is amended 

by adding paragraph (dd) under 

Missouri to read as follows: 

Appendix A to Part 70—Approval 

Status of State and Local Operating 

Permits Programs 

* * * * * 

Missouri 

* * * * * 

(dd) The Missouri Department of Natural 

Resources submitted revisions to Missouri 

rule 10 CSR 10–6.110, ‘‘Reporting Emission 

Data, Emission Fees, and Process 

Information’’ on October 2, 2013. The state 

effective date is October 30, 2013. This 

revision is effective May 18, 2015. 

* * * * * 

[FR Doc. 2015–06115 Filed 3–18–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 180 

[EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0326; FRL–9924–24] 

Sodium L-Lactate and Sodium DLLactate; Exemption From the 

Requirement of a Tolerance 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: This regulation establishes an 

exemption from the requirement of a 

tolerance for residues of sodium LVerDate Sep<11>2014 15:06 Mar 18, 2015 Jkt 235001 PO 00000 Frm 00024 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\19MRR1.SGM 19MRR1

Rmajette on DSK2VPTVN1PROD with RULES