alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 250 (Thursday, December 30, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 82381-82382]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-32837]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER11-2436-000]


Oracle Energy Services, LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial 
Market-Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 
Authorization

December 22, 2010.
    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of 
Oracle Energy Services, LLC's application for market-based rate 
authority, with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such 
application includes a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR

[[Page 82382]]

part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 
385.214). Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a 
copy of that document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability, is January 11, 2011.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link 
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification 
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with 
any FERC Online service, please e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5e181b0c1d11303237303b0d2b2e2e312c2a1e383b2c3d70393128"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="7c3a392e3f3312101512192f090c0c130e083c1a190e1f521b130a">[email protected]</span></a>. or 
call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-32837 Filed 12-29-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
§ 1401.400 What must I do to comply with this part if I am an individual recipient? As a condition of receiving a DOI award, if you are an individual recipient, you must agree that— ( a ) You will not engage in the unlawful manufacture, distribution, dispensing, possession, or use of a controlled substance in conducting any activity related to the award; and
( b ) If you are convicted of a criminal drug offense resulting from a violation occurring during the conduct of any award activity, you will report the conviction: ( 1 ) In writing.
( 2 ) Within 10 calendar days of the conviction.
( 3 ) To the Department of the Interior awarding official or other designee for each award that you currently have, unless § 1401.401 or the award document designates a central point for the receipt of the notices. When notice is made to a central point, it must include the identification number(s) of each affected award.
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 15-3490

___________________________

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

Shane Denny

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant

____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Western District of Missouri - Springfield

____________

 Submitted: May 2, 2016

Filed: May 5, 2016

[Unpublished]

____________

Before WOLLMAN, BOWMAN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.

Shane Denny was found incompetent under 18 U.S.C. § 4241(d) to stand trial

on federal charges involving violent conduct and was then civilly committed

following proceedings held under 18 U.S.C. § 4246 ( providing for the hospitalization

of a person found to be suffering from a mental disease or defect such that his release
would be dangerous). Denny appeals from the commitment order entered by the

District Court, challenging the sufficiency of the evidence. 1

After reviewing the record, we see no clear error. See United States v.

Williams, 299 F.3d 673, 676 (8th Cir. 2002) (setting forth the standard of review and

noting that a finding is clearly erroneous only if the reviewing court is left with

definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been made); United States v. LeClair,

338 F.3d 882, 885 (8th Cir.) (noting that factors suggesting dangerousness include

a history of prior assault; substance abuse; “extreme paranoia and grandiose

delusions; . . . little insight into [one’s] mental illness and need for treatment; no

assurance of compliance with treatment outside a structured setting; potential access

to weapons; and lack of external environmental controls on release”), cert. denied,

540 U.S. 1025 (2003). In particular, the District Court’s order is supported by

Denny’s demonstrated lack of insight into his major mental illness; his history of

deterioration when noncompliant with treatment; his paranoid beliefs and continuing

symptoms, even while compliant with treatment; and his history of violent behavior. 

We therefore affirm the judgment of the District Court, and we grant counsel’s

motion to withdraw.

______________________________

The Honorable M. Douglas Harpool, United States District Judge for the

1

Western District of Missouri, adopting the report and recommendations of the

Honorable David P. Rush, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of

Missouri.

-2-
#### Benjamin Koenig, Appellant, v. E. R. A. Associates, Inc., Respondent.

In this action to recover damages for fraud, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated June 20, 1969, which granted defendant’s motion for a final order of preclusion and denied plaintiff’s cross motion to strike defendant’s answer. Order modified to the extent of: (1) reinstating plaintiff’s responses to Items 1, 2, 3, 6, 8 and 10 in the demand for a bill of particulars, and (2) affording plaintiff 20 days from the date of service upon him of our order, with notice of entry, within which to file a supplemental bill of particulars as to Items 4, 5, 7 and 9 of the demand. If an appropriate supplemental bill as to these four items is not served within that period, the absolute order of preclusion as to these four items will remain intact. As so modified, order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. In our view, the reinstated particulars are sufficiently definite to apprise defendant of the nature of plaintiff’s claims and are adequate properly to limit the scope of the complaint (cf. *Mencken*v. *Edelman,*19 A D 2d 821). As to the responses to the remaining items in the demand, it appears from the record that plaintiff was not afforded an opportunity to serve a supplemental bill prior to the issuance of the *absolute*order of preclusion. In the interests of justice, plaintiff should be afforded such opportunity. Christ, P. J., Rabin, Hopkins, Martuseello and Brennan, JJ., concur.
#### LEHIGH VALLEY R. CO., Respondent, v. PARKER, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

May 27, 1914.)

Action by the Lehigh Valley Railroad Company against Amasa J. Parker.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment and orders affirmed, with costs. See, also, 151 App. Div. 898, 135 N. Y. Supp. 1123.

FOOTE, J., not sitting.
2007-1947.

#### State v. Hall.

Warren App. No. CA2006-10-121. On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied.

Pfeifer, J., dissents.
###### Editorial Note on Part 180

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 180 appear at 79 FR 75879, Dec. 19, 2014.

#### § 180.1000 Respondent.

*Respondent* means a person against whom an agency has initiated a debarment or suspension action.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**Certification of Chief Executive Officer Under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

The undersigned officer of The First Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company") hereby certifies that the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009 to which this certification is being furnished as an exhibit (the "Report"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. This certification is provided pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K ("Item 601(b)(32)") promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"), and the Exchange Act. In accordance with clause (ii) of Item 601(b)(32), thiscertification (A) shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and (B) shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.

 

Date: August 7, 2009

 

/s/ Daniel R. Daigneault

Daniel R. Daigneault

President & Chief Executive Officer

The First Bancorp, Inc.
Exhibit
      32.1 Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Calgon Carbon Corporation (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John S.
      Stanik, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§
1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that **** to
      the
      best of my knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company for the periods
      presented therein.





/s/
                John S. StanikChief
                Executive Officer


May
      8,
      2008








This
      certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
      Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL DATA EXTRACTED FROM THE REGISTRANT'S
AUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE QUARTER ENDED APRIL
27, 1996, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS AND THE NOTES THERETO.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-02-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-03-1996
<CASH>                                              40
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      995
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                       9781
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 11140
<PP&E>                                           26105
<DEPRECIATION>                                   21072
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   16173
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            14303
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         12992
<OTHER-SE>                                     (13666)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     16173
<SALES>                                          13466
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 13466
<CGS>                                            10553
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    14536
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 127
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (1197)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (479)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (718)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (718)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5


<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                              16,300
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      150,900
<ALLOWANCES>                                         9,400
<INVENTORY>                                        118,900
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   303,600
<PP&E>                                           1,175,400
<DEPRECIATION>                                     586,100
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,097,800
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              184,000
<BONDS>                                            958,200
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                           178,400
<OTHER-SE>                                        (268,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1,097,800
<SALES>                                            279,600
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   279,600
<CGS>                                              230,200
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      256,700
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      (600)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  22,100
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      1,400
<INCOME-TAX>                                           500
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    900
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                           900
<EPS-BASIC>                                         0.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0.02


</TABLE>
#### § 1401.235 Drug-free workplace.

*Drug-free workplace* means a site for the performance of work done in connection with a specific award at which employees of the recipient are prohibited from engaging in the unlawful manufacture, distribution, dispensing, possession, or use of a controlled substance.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                               46767
<SECURITIES>                                        905810
<RECEIVABLES>                                       322894
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                         396923
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   1704994
<PP&E>                                             1454376
<DEPRECIATION>                                     (351843)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     5042781
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              2588560
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                            245
<COMMON>                                              3219
<OTHER-SE>                                         (134300)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       5042781
<SALES>                                            1135905
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   1135905
<CGS>                                               741640
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       741640
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    636684
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  143103
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (373334)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (373334)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (373334)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         (.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         (.12)
        

</TABLE>
#### Potter Real Estate Co., Inc., Appellant, v. O & S Bearing & Mfg. Co., Respondent.

No 3.

Appeal dismissed as academic, without costs. (Appeal from order of Onondaga Special Term denying motion to vacate order extending time to answer interrogatories.) Present—Goldman, P. J., Marsh, Witmer, Moule and Bastow, JJ.
#### GLOBE WOOLEN CO. v. UTICA GAS & ELECTRIC CO.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

March 3, 1915.)

Action by the Globe Woolen Company against the Utica Gas & Electric Company.

No opinion. Motion granted. See, also, 151 N. Y. Supp. 1118.
§ 75.45 Content of advance notification. ( a ) The notifications required by § 75.43 must include the element weight of nuclear material being received or shipped, the chemical composition and physical form, the isotopic composition (to the extent specified by license conditions), the estimated date and place at the reporting facility where the nuclear material is to be unpackaged or prepared for shipment (and where the quantity and composition can be verified), the applicable IAEA material balance area at the reporting facility, the approximate number of items to be received or shipped, and the probable dates of receipt or shipment. The notification must indicate that the information is being supplied under § 75.43.
( b ) The notifications required with respect to export and import shipments shall also include ( 1 ) If available, a general description of containers (including, in the case of exports, features that would permit sealing);
( 2 ) Destination of export as authorized under an export license issued pursuant to part 110 of this chapter, or origin of import (by country and, if known, place);
( 3 ) Means of transport; and
( 4 ) Expected date and place of arrival in the destination country (for exports) or in the United States (for imports).
[45 FR 50711, July 31, 1980, as amended at 73 FR 78614, Dec. 23, 2008]
#### § 2336.437 What method do I use to communicate to a participant the requirements described in the OMB guidance at 2 CFR 180.435?

To communicate to a participant the requirements described in 2 CFR 180.435 of the OMB guidance, you must include a term or condition in the transaction that requires the participant's compliance with subpart C of 2 CFR part 180, as supplemented by subpart C of this part, and requires the participant to include a similar term or condition in lower-tier covered transactions.
EX-35.13


Commercial Mortgage Servicing
D1086-120, 12th Floor
550 South Tryon Street
Charlotte, NC 28202
1-800-326-1334


ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement
dated as of March 1, 2013, by and among WELLS FARGO COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE
SECURITIES, INC., as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,
as General Master Servicer, RIALTO CAPITAL ADVISORS, LLC, as General
Special Servicer, NCB, FSB, as NCB Master Servicer, NCB, FSB, as Co-op
Special Servicer, PENTALPHA SURVEILLANCE LLC, as Trust Advisor, WELLS
FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Certificate Administrator, as Tax
Administrator and as Custodian, and U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as
Trustee, with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates
WFRBS 2013-C12 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not
otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

Pursuant to Section 11.12 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive
Vice President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:

1. A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period from March 1,
   2013 through December 31, 2013 (the "Reporting Period"), and of its
   performance per the Agreement during such period has been made under my
   supervision, and

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer, has
   fulfilled all of its obligations under this Agreement in all material
   respects throughout the Reporting Period.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of
the 7th day of March 2014.



/s/ Daniel Bober
Daniel Bober
Executive Vice President
Wells Fargo Bank

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

(logo) Together we'll go far
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Altair International
Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended March 31, 2015, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Alan M. Smith, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





|Date: August 12, 2015 |  | /s/ Alan M. Smith      
|--------------------- |  | -----------------------
|                      |  | Alan M. Smith          
|                      |  | Chief Financial Officer