alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 1536.505 Who in the Environmental Protection Agency determines that a recipient who is an individual violated the requirements of this part?

The EPA Administrator or designee is the official authorized to make the determination under 2 CFR 182.505.
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 97-10010

_____________________

JOHN P. BEARD,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

GARY L. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR,

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL

JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION,

Respondent-Appellee.

_______________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for

the Northern District of Texas

(7:96-CV-84-X)

_______________________________________________________

April 9, 1998

Before REAVLEY, DeMOSS and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

John Beard was convicted of murder and sentenced to 99 years

in prison by a Texas court in 1955. He was paroled in 1965. In

1983 he stopped making annual reports to the Director of Parole

Supervision as he was required to do as a condition of his

parole. In 1992 a warrant was issued for his arrest for his

failure to make the annual reports. He waived hearing and his

parole was revoked. Now he brings this habeas corpus action,
2

claiming that his constitutional right to due process was

violated by Texas in the nine year delay between 1983 to 1992. 

The district court denied his claim and we affirm.

Beard cites the case of United States v. Tyler, 605 F.2d 851

(5th Cir. 1979) as authority supporting his claim. There we held

that the federal probation officer could not, after a denied

petition for revocation, file a new petition for revocation based

on misdemeanor conduct known prior to the first hearing. We said

that the decision not to file those charges in the first

petition, coupled with lengthy delay, made the later action

fundamentally unfair. The Tyler case has no bearing on Beard’s

claim. Beard complains only of delay. This court has said that

a state’s inaction must be “so grossly negligent that it would be

unequivocally inconsistent with ‘fundamental principles of

liberty and justice’ to require a legal sentence to be served in

the aftermath of such .... inaction.” Piper v. Estelle, 485 F.2d

245, 246 (5th Cir. 1973). It has also been held that inaction by

the state for ten years neither waived jurisdiction nor offended

due process rights of the prisoner. Clifton v. Beto, 298 F.Supp.

134 (S.D.Tex. 1968), affirmed, 411 F.2d 1226 (5th Cir. 1969).

We do not see that Beard has suffered any prejudice and,

instead, continued to make no annual reports up to the date of

his arrest in 1992. See Cortinas v. U. S. Parole Com’n, 938 F.2d

43, 45 (5th Cir. 1991).

AFFIRMED
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15

- 30888

BOLLINGER MARINE FABRICATORS, L.L.C.; BOLLINGER SHIPYARDS LOCKPORT, L.L.C.,

Plaintiffs

- Appellees Cross

- Appellants

v.

MARINE TRAVELIFT, INCORPORATED,

Defendant

- Appellant Cross

- Appellee

Appeal s from the United States District Court

for the East ern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 2:14

- CV

- 1743

Before JONES, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges

.
PER CURIAM: *

The court has carefully considered this appeal in light of the briefs, oral

argument, and pertinent portions of the record. Having done so, we find no

error of law or reversible error of fact. The district court’s judgment is

AFFIRMED for essentially the same reasons articulated by that court.

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit 

### FILED
September 12, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk Case: 15-30888 Document: 00513674745 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/12/2016
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended
      September 30, 2008 (the “Report”) of Patient Safety Technologies, Inc. (the
“Registrant”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
      hereof, I, William Adams, as the Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge,
      that:





(1)
      the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)
      the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Registrant.




Dated:
                November 14, 2008
            By:
            /s/ William
              AdamsWilliam
                AdamsChief
                Executive Officer






A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000812075
<NAME> UNO RESTAURANT CORP.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-01-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-04-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-02-2000
<CASH>                                             836
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,523
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      2,646
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 8,139
<PP&E>                                         223,518
<DEPRECIATION>                                  86,651
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 136,867
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           24,500
<BONDS>                                         52,443
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           156
<OTHER-SE>                                      82,630<F1>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   159,729
<SALES>                                        107,807
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               107,807
<CGS>                                           26,971
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  100,029
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (54)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,436
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,396
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,175
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,221
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,221
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.37
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.35
<FN>
<F1>NET OF TREASURY STOCK
</FN>


</TABLE>
§ 850.5 Dispute resolution. ( a ) Subject to paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section, any worker who is adversely affected by an action taken, or failure to act, under this part may petition the Office of Hearings and Appeals for relief in accordance with 10 CFR part 1003, Subpart G.
( b ) The Office of Hearings and Appeals may not accept a petition from a worker unless the worker requested the responsible employer to correct the violation, and the responsible employer refused or failed to take corrective action within a reasonable time.
( c ) If the dispute relates to a term or condition of employment that is covered by a grievance-arbitration provision in a collective bargaining agreement, the worker must exhaust all applicable grievance-arbitration procedures before filing a petition for relief with the Office of Hearings and Appeals. A worker is deemed to have exhausted all applicable grievance-arbitration procedures if 150 days have passed since the filing of a grievance and a final decision on it has not been issued.
IV 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1144 

Recognizing November 24, 2018, as ‘‘Small Business Saturday’’ and supporting efforts to increase awareness of the value of locally owned small 

businesses. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 13, 2018 

Mr. CHABOT (for himself, Ms. VELA ́ZQUEZ, Ms. ADAMS, Mr. ESPAILLAT, Mr. 

LAWSON of Florida, Mrs. RADEWAGEN, Mr. LUETKEMEYER, Mr. SCHNEIDER, Mr. FITZPATRICK, Mr. BRAT, Mr. EVANS, Miss GONZA ́LEZ-COLO ́N

of Puerto Rico, Mr. CURTIS, Ms. JUDY CHU of California, Mr. NORMAN, 

Mr. BLUM, Mr. MARSHALL, Mr. KING of Iowa, Mr. KNIGHT, Mr. KELLY

of Mississippi, Mr. BALDERSON, Ms. CLARKE of New York, Ms. MCCOLLUM, Mr. HIGGINS of New York, Ms. PINGREE, Ms. HANABUSA, Mr. 

LOEBSACK, Mr. SCHWEIKERT, Ms. NORTON, Mr. JOHNSON of Georgia, 

Mr. DELANEY, Mr. GRIJALVA, Ms. KELLY of Illinois, Mr. TIPTON, Mr. 

SEAN PATRICK MALONEY of New York, Mr. MOULTON, Mr. STIVERS, 

and Ms. BONAMICI) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Small Business 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing November 24, 2018, as ‘‘Small Business Saturday’’ and supporting efforts to increase awareness of 

the value of locally owned small businesses. 

Whereas there are over 30,200,000 small businesses in the 

United States; 

Whereas small businesses represent 99.9 percent of all businesses with employees in the United States; 


SSpencer on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1144 IH 

Whereas small businesses employ nearly 48 percent of the 

employees in the private sector in the United States; 

Whereas small businesses pay 40.8 percent of the total payroll of the employees in the private sector in the United 

States; 

Whereas small businesses constitute nearly 98 percent of 

firms exporting goods; 

Whereas small businesses generated 1,900,000 net new jobs; 

and 

Whereas November 24, 2018, is an appropriate day to designate as ‘‘Small Business Saturday’’: Now, therefore, be 

it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) recognizes and encourages the observance of 

3 ‘‘Small Business Saturday’’; and 

4 (2) supports efforts— 

5 (A) to encourage consumers to shop lo6 cally; and 

7 (B) to increase awareness of the value of 

8 locally owned small businesses and the impact 

9 of locally owned small businesses on the econ10 omy of the United States. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with BILLS
CASE ANNOUNCEMENTS

*February 1, 2008*

[Cite as *02/0112008 Case Announcements,*2008-Ohio-334.]

MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS

2007-0375.

#### State v. Gardner.

Montgomery App. No. 21357, 2007-0hio-182. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Montgomery County. Upon consideration of appellee’s motion for stay of lower court proceedings and appellant’s motion for stay of the court of appeals’ judgment,

It is ordered by the court that the motions are granted.
Editorial Note on Part 180
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 180 appear at 79 FR 75879, Dec. 19, 2014.

§ 180.840 How is fact-finding conducted? ( a ) If fact-finding is conducted— ( 1 ) You may present witnesses and other evidence, and confront any witness presented; and
( 2 ) The fact-finder must prepare written findings of fact for the record.
( b ) A transcribed record of fact-finding proceedings must be made, unless you as a respondent and the Federal agency agree to waive it in advance. If you want a copy of the transcribed record, you may purchase it.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 249 (Wednesday, December 29, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 82033]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-32746]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research; Notice of 
Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of a meeting of the 
National Advisory Dental and Craniofacial Research Council.
    The meeting will be open to the public as indicated below, with 
attendance limited to space available. Individuals who plan to attend 
and need special assistance, such as sign language interpretation or 
other reasonable accommodations, should notify the Contact Person 
listed below in advance of the meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Advisory Dental and Craniofacial 
Research Council.
    Date: January 24, 2011.
    Open: 8:30 a.m. to 11:30 a.m.
    Agenda: Report to the Director, NIDCR.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Building 31C, 31 Center 
Drive, 6th Floor, Conference Room 10, Bethesda, MD 20892.
    Closed: 1 p.m. to Adjournment.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Building 31C, 31 Center 
Drive, 6th Floor, Conference Room 10, Bethesda, MD 20892.
    Contact Person: Alicia J. Dombroski, PhD, Director, Division of 
Extramural Activities, Natl. Inst. of Dental and Craniofacial 
Research, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892.
    Information is also available on the Institute's/Center's home 
page: http://www.nidcr.nih.gov/about, where an agenda and any 
additional information for the meeting will be posted when 
available.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.121, Oral 
Diseases and Disorders Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: December 21, 2010.
Jennifer S. Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2010-32746 Filed 12-28-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-12-00672-CR

Stacey Bo Williamson, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY, 27TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 68423, HONORABLE JOE CARROLL, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant StaceyBo Williamson pleaded guilty to credit-card abuse and was placed

on deferred-adjudication communitysupervision for five years. SeeTex.Code Crim. Proc. art. 42.12

(community supervision); Tex. Penal Code §32.31(credit-card and debit-card abuse). Shortly

thereafter, the State filed a motion to proceed with adjudication of guilt based on appellant’s failure

to comply with the terms and conditions of his deferred-adjudication community supervision. 

Appellant pleaded true to two violations involving use of methamphetamine, and the State

abandoned the remaining allegations of violations.

After hearing testimony from appellant’s mother and grandmother concerning the

appropriate punishment, the trial court revoked appellant’s probation, adjudicated him guilty on the

credit-card abuse charge, sentenced him to two years in prison, and suspended his sentence for five

years. As part of the terms of community supervision, the court ordered appellant to enter and
remain in a substance abuse felony punishment facility for no more than one year. See Tex. Code

Crim. Proc. art. 42.12, §§ 15 (procedures relating to state jail felony community supervision), 22

(continuation or modification of community supervision after violation of condition of community

supervision); Tex. Gov’t Code § 493.009 (governing substance abuse felony punishment facilities).

Appellant’s court-appointed attorney has filed a motion to withdraw supported by a

brief concluding that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements

of Anders v. California by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating

why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744

(1967); Garner v. State, 300 S.W.3d 763, 766 (Tex. Crim. App. 2009); see also Penson v. Ohio,

488 U.S. 75 (1988).

Appellant was served a copy of counsel’s brief and was advised of his right

to examine the appellate record and to file a pro se brief. See Anders, 386 U.S. at 744; Garner,

300 S.W.3d at 766. No pro se brief or other written response has been filed.

We have reviewed the record, including appellate counsel’s brief, and find no

reversible error. See Anders, 386 U.S. at 744; Garner, 300 S.W.3d at 766; Bledsoe v. State,

178 S.W.3d 824, 826-27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). We agree with counsel that the record presents

no arguably meritorious grounds for review and the appeal is frivolous. Counsel’s motion to

withdraw is granted. The judgment of conviction is affirmed.

2
____________________________________________

J. Woodfin Jones, Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Goodwin and Field

Affirmed

Filed: May 22, 2013

Do Not Publish

3
§ 1401.300 What must I do to comply with this part? There are two general requirements if you are a recipient other than an individual. ( a ) First, you must make a good faith effort, on a continuing basis, to maintain a drug-free workplace. You must agree to do so as a condition for receiving any award covered by this part. The specific measures that you must take in this regard are described in more detail in subsequent sections of this subpart. Briefly, those measures are to— ( 1 ) Publish a drug-free workplace statement and establish a drug-free awareness program for your employees; and
( 2 ) Take actions concerning employees who are convicted of violating drug statutes in the workplace.
( b ) Second, you must identify all known workplaces under your Federal awards.
1 Attachment 

Dear Ms. Rivera: 

 

Please accept these public comments on the Supplemental Statement of Basis PSD permit application for Avenal 

Energy Project. We plan to make our comments verbally at the public hearing as well. 

 

Thank you, 

 

 

Laura Baker 

Staff Attorney

Center on Race, Poverty & the Environment

1302 Jefferson St. Suite 2

Delano, CA 93215

(661) 720-9140 x 303

(661) 720--9483 fax

Avenal Energy Project Public Comments 

Laura Baker 

to: 

R9AirPermits 

04/12/2011 02:05 PM 

Cc: 

"Ingrid Brostrom" 

Hide Details 

From: "Laura Baker" <lbaker@crpe-ej.org>

To: R9AirPermits@EPA 

Cc: "Ingrid Brostrom" <ibrostrom@crpe-ej.org>

History: This message has been forwarded. 

Avenal psd permit comments2.pdf

Page 1 of 2

file://C:\Documents and Settings\SRIVER02\Local Settings\Temp\notesBAAA25\~web62... 4/15/2011
Lbaker@crpe-ej.org

www.crpe-ej.org

Providing Legal and Technical Assistance to the Grassroots Movement for Environmental 

Justice

PRIVILEGE AND CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE 

This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed 

and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure 

under applicable law as attorney client and work-product confidential or otherwise 

confidential communications. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you 

are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication or 

other use of a transmission received in error is strictly prohibited. 

 

 

Page 2 of 2

file://C:\Documents and Settings\SRIVER02\Local Settings\Temp\notesBAAA25\~web62... 4/15/2011
§ 1138.505 Title to property under subawards. ( a ) *Requirement.* A DoD Component's general terms and conditions must specify requirements related to title to property under subawards.
( b ) *Award terms and conditions* — ( 1 ) *General.* A DoD Component's general terms and conditions must use the wording appendix E to this part provides as Section B of SUB Article V to specify the requirements concerning title to property that recipients must include in their subawards.
( 2 ) *Exception.* If a DoD Component has the necessary statutory authority to do so and includes provisions in paragraph A.2 of PROP Article I to identify any property acquired under the award as exempt property, as described in 2 CFR 1130.105, the DoD Component may at its option insert wording in paragraph B.1.b of SUB Article V to allow recipients to pass through those provisions to subrecipients. ( i ) It is critical, however, that the DoD Component ensures that the wording of paragraph B.1.b is consistent with the statutory authority.
( ii ) For example, if the statutory authority is 31 U.S.C. 6306—as described in 2 CFR 1130.105(b)(2)(i)—the wording of paragraph B.1.b of SUB Article V may permit a recipient to flow down the substance of the exempt property provision in paragraph A.2 of PROP Article I only to a subrecipient that is a nonprofit institution of higher education or nonprofit organization whose primary purpose is conducting scientific research.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          34,612
<SECURITIES>                                    48,110
<RECEIVABLES>                                  130,866
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,361
<INVENTORY>                                     87,202
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               308,855
<PP&E>                                         123,066
<DEPRECIATION>                                  75,670
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 371,384
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           87,160
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           735
<OTHER-SE>                                     283,489
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   371,384
<SALES>                                        192,167
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               192,167
<CGS>                                          128,333
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  128,333
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                42,637
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   427
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  29
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 23,783
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,568
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             20,215
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    20,215
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.28
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.26


</TABLE>