alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 248 (Tuesday, December 28, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 81685]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-32727]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meeting

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the Securities 
and Exchange Commission will hold a Closed Meeting on Wednesday, 
December 29, 2010 at 2 p.m.
    Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the 
Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the Closed Meeting. 
Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters also may be 
present.
    The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has 
certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth 
in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (7), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR 
200.402(a)(3), (5), (7), 9(ii) and (10), permit consideration of the 
scheduled matters at the Closed Meeting.
    Commissioner Casey, as duty officer, voted to consider the items 
listed for the Closed Meeting in a closed session.
    The subject matter of the Closed Meeting scheduled for Wednesday, 
December 29, 2010 will be:

    Institution and settlement of injunctive actions; institution 
and settlement of administrative proceedings; consideration of 
amicus participation; and other matters relating to enforcement 
proceedings.

    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in 
the scheduling of meeting items.
    For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have 
been added, deleted or postponed, please contact:
    The Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

    Dated: December 22, 2010.
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-32727 Filed 12-23-10; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE P
#### In the Matter of the Arbitration between Methodist Church of Babylon, Appellant, and Glen-Rich Construction Corp., Respondent.

Order of the Supreme Court, Hassau County, dated September 23,1968, affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs, on the opinion at Special Term. Brennan, Acting P. J., Hopkins, Benjamin, Munder and Martuscello, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 33 (Friday, February 19, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 7452]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-3263]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army, Corps of Engineers


Intent To Prepare a Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) 
for the State of Alaska's Proposed Alaska Stand Alone Pipeline (ASAP) 
Natural Gas Transportation Pipeline

AGENCY: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, DoD.

ACTION: Notice of Intent; Extension of scoping period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In December 4, 2009, issue of the Federal Register (74 FR 
63736), the Alaska District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps), 
published a Notice of Intent to prepare a Draft Environmental Impact 
Statement (DEIS) to identify and analyze the potential impacts 
associated with the construction of the proposed Alaska Stand Alone 
Pipeline (ASAP) natural gas transportation pipeline. In that notice, 
the Alaska District stated that the scoping period would end on 
February 5, 2010. In response to several requests, the Alaska District 
has decided to extend the scoping period to March 8, 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Questions about the proposed action 
and the DEIS can be answered by: Ms. Serena Sweet, Regulatory Division, 
telephone: (907) 753-2819, toll free in AK: (800) 478-2712, fax: (907) 
753-5567, e-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#fe8d9b8c9b909fd09bd08d899b9b8abe8b8d9f9d9bd09f8c9387d0939792"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="ccbfa9bea9a2ade2a9e2bfbba9a9b88cb9bfadafa9e2adbea1b5e2a1a5a0">[email protected]</span></a>, or mail: U.S. Army 
Corps of Engineers, CEPOA-RD, Post Office Box 6898, Elmendorf AFB, 
Alaska 99506-0898. Additional information may be obtained at http://www.asapeis.com.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: None.

    Date: February 4, 2010.
    Approved by:

Serena E. Sweet,
Project Manager, Alaska District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
[FR Doc. 2010-3263 Filed 2-18-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3720-58-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
H. Res. 8

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

January 4, 2005.

Resolved, That unless otherwise ordered, before Monday,

May 16, 2005, the hour of daily meeting of the House shall

be 2 p.m. on Mondays; noon on Tuesdays; and 10 a.m. on

all other days of the week; and from Monday, May 16, 2005,

until the end of the first session, the hour of daily meeting

of the House shall be noon on Mondays; 10 a.m. on Tuesdays, Wednesdays, and Thursdays; and 9 a.m. on all other

days of the week.

Attest:

Clerk.
IV 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 81 

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Energy and 

Commerce in the One Hundred Fifteenth Congress. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 1, 2017 

Mr. WALDEN submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on House Administration 

RESOLUTION 

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on 

Energy and Commerce in the One Hundred Fifteenth 

Congress. 

1 Resolved, 

2 SECTION 1. AMOUNTS FOR COMMITTEE EXPENSES. 

3 For the expenses of the Committee on Energy and 

4 Commerce (hereafter in this resolution referred to as the 

5 ‘‘Committee’’), including the expenses of all staff salaries, 

6 there shall be paid, out of the applicable accounts of the 

7 House of Representatives for committee salaries and ex8 penses, not more than $20,531,442 for the One Hundred 

9 Fifteenth Congress. 


smartinez on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 81 IH 

1 SEC. 2. SESSION LIMITATIONS. 

2 Of the amount specified in section 1— 

3 (1) not more than $10,265,721 shall be avail4 able for expenses incurred during the period begin5 ning at noon on January 3, 2017, and ending imme6 diately before noon on January 3, 2018; and 

7 (2) not more than $10,265,721 shall be avail8 able for expenses incurred during the period begin9 ning at noon on January 3, 2018, and ending imme10 diately before noon on January 3, 2019. 

11 SEC. 3. VOUCHERS. 

12 Payments under this resolution shall be made on 

13 vouchers authorized by the Committee, signed by the 

14 Chairman of the Committee, and approved in the manner 

15 directed by the Committee on House Administration. 

16 SEC. 4. REGULATIONS. 

17 Amounts made available under this resolution shall 

18 be expended in accordance with regulations prescribed by 

19 the Committee on House Administration. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 OCT-1-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         230,619
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               230,619
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 230,619
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          4,100
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       226,569
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   230,619
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  16,053
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (5,966)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (10,087)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (10,087)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (10,087)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        


</TABLE>
§ 1500.1 Definitions. ( a ) *Participant support costs.* The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has supplemented 2 CFR 200.1, *Participant support costs,* to provide that allowable participant support costs under EPA assistance agreements include: ( 1 ) Rebates or other subsidies provided to program participants for purchases and installations of commercially available, standard (“off the shelf”) pollution control equipment or low emission vehicles under the Diesel Emission Reduction Act program or programs authorized by EPA appropriation acts and permitted by terms specified in EPA assistance agreements or guidance, when the program participant rather than the recipient owns the equipment.
( 2 ) Subsidies, rebates, and other payments provided to program beneficiaries to encourage participation in statutorily authorized programs to encourage environmental stewardship and enable the public to participate in EPA funded research, pollution abatement, and other projects or programs to the extent permitted by statutes and terms specified in EPA assistance agreements or guidance.
( b ) [Reserved]
#### § 1108.4 Definitions of terms that vary depending on context.

DoDGARs definitions of some terms related to types of legal instruments (*e.g.,* “contract”) and purposes for which they are used (*e.g.,* “procurement” or “acquisition”) may vary, depending on the context. Appendix A to this part provides additional information about those terms and their definitions.
§ 810.8 Restrictions on general and specific authorization. A general or specific authorization granted by the Secretary under this part: ( a ) Is limited to activities involving only unclassified information and does not permit furnishing classified information;
( b ) Does not relieve a person from complying with the relevant laws or the regulations of other U.S. Government agencies applicable to exports; and
( c ) Does not authorize a person to engage in any activity when the person knows or has reason to know that the activity is intended to provide assistance in designing, developing, fabricating, or testing a nuclear explosive device.
#### SCHERER v. JOSEPH FALLERT BREWING CO., Limited, et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

June 26, 1914.)

Action by Henry Scherer against Joseph Fallert Brewing Company, Limited, and others.

No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs.
###### Editorial Note on Part 9

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 9 appear at 82 FR 52825, Nov. 15, 2017.

#### § 9.50 Scope of subpart.

This subpart implements the provisions of section 3 of the Privacy Act of 1974, Pub. L. 93-579, 5 U.S.C. 552a, with respect to (a) the procedures by which individuals may determine the existence of, seek access to and request correction of NRC records concerning themselves, and (b) the requirements applicable to NRC personnel with respect to the use and dissemination of such records. The regulations in this subpart apply to all records which are retrievable from a system of records under the control of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission by the use of an individual's name or of an identifying number, symbol, or other identifying particular assigned to such individual. Except where specifically provided otherwise, this subpart applies to all NRC records maintained on individuals whether they predate or postdate September 27, 1975.
**Exhibit 32.1**WESTCORPCERTIFICATION OF CEOIn connection with the Quarterly Report of Westcorp (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the periodending June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, to the bestof his knowledge and belief and pursuant to 18 U.S.C., Chapter 63, Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes–Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.The foregoing Certification is furnished solely for purposes of complying with the provisions ofSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and is not intended to be used for any other purpose.**WESTCORP**     /s/ Ernest S. Rady     Ernest S. RadyChairman of the Board andChief Executive Officer     Date: August 8, 2005
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATIONS**I, Thomas M. Duff, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Wellman, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect tothe period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internalcontrol over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is beingprepared;  (b) Designed such internal control over financialreporting, or caused such internal control overfinancial reporting to be designed under oursupervision, to provide reasonable assurance regardingthe reliability of financial reporting and thepreparation of financial statements for externalpurposes in accordance with generally acceptedaccounting principles;  (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented inthis report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  (d) Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors: (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.        Date May 10, 2007 By:  /s/ Thomas M. Duff    Chief Executive Officer
§ 605.20 Dissemination of results. ( a ) Recipients are encouraged to disseminate project results promptly. DOE reserves the right to utilize, and have others utilize, to the extent it deems appropriate, the reports resulting from awards.
( b ) DOE may waive progress reporting requirements set forth in § 605.19, if the recipient submits to DOE a copy of its own report which is published or accepted for publication in a recognized scientific or technical journal and which satisfies the information requirements of the program.
( c ) Recipients are urged to publish results through normal publication channels in accordance with the applicable provisions of 2 CFR part 200 as amended by 2 CFR part 910.
( d ) The article shall include an acknowledgment that the project was supported, in whole or in part, by a DOE award, and specify the award number, but state that such support does not constitute an endorsement by DOE of the views expressed in the article.
[57 FR 40583, Sept. 3, 1992, as amended at 79 FR 76047, Dec. 19, 2014]
CLEARVIEW INVESTMENTS, LTD.
                       2000 East Lamar Blvd., Suite 150
                            Arlington, Texas 76006

                               November 7, 1997

Factory Outlet Centre Limited Liability Company
c/o The Balcor Company
Bannockburn Lake Office Plaza
2355 Waukegan Road
Site A-200
Bannockburn, Illinois  60015

RE:  Agreement of Sale dated as of August 25, 1997 between Insignia Commercial
Investments Group, Inc. ("Assignor") and Factory Outlet Centre Limited
Liability Company ("Seller") for the purchase and sale of property known as the
Factory Outlet Center in Kenosha, Wisconsin ("Property") as amended by
September 8, 1997 Letter Agreement, as amended by October 7, 1997 Letter
Agreement, and as assigned on October 24, 1997 to Clearview Investments, Ltd.
("Assignee") herein referred to as Purchaser

Dear Madam or Sir:

     Under the above referenced Agreement of Sale, the Purchase Price (as
defined herein) is $15,000,000.00, the Inspection Period, as defined therein,
expires on November 17, 1997 and the Closing Date, as defined therein, was to
be December 15, 1997.

     This letter shall confirm that Seller, has among other things, agreed to
provide Purchaser with additional time to conduct investigations and studies of
the Property.  It shall be at Purchaser's sole discretion, whether to elect to
purchase the Property, or to terminate the Agreement of Sale, as provided in
Article 7 thereof.

     The Inspection Period shall be revised to end at 5:00 p.m. Chicago time on
November 24, 1997 and the Closing Date shall be  December 15, 1997.

     Except as provided herein, the Agreement of Sale shall remain unmodified
and in full force and effect.

     The date that Purchaser shall release the Earnest Money to Seller pursuant
to the Consent to Assignment of the agreement dated October 24, 1997 shall be
revised from November 17, 1997 to November 24, 1997.

     If the amendments to the Agreement of Sale provided in this letter are
acceptable, please indicate your agreement on behalf of Seller, where indicated
below.
<PAGE>
                    Sincerely,

                    CLEARVIEW INVESTMENTS, LTD.
                    By:  Redbud Capital, Inc.
                         Its general partner

                    By:  /s/Carla B. Fulton
                           ------------------------------------
                    Title:  Carla B. Fulton, Vice President

Agreed and Accepted this 7th day of November, 1997

Factory Outlet Centre Limited Liability Company
By:  Outlet Centre Investors, a member

     By:  Balcor Partners-XXI, its general partner

          By:  /s/ Michael J. Becker
                 ------------------------------
          Name:  Michael J. Becker
          Its:   Authorized Representative

cc:  Michael R. Horowitz
<PAGE>
IV 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 134 

Supporting the goals and ideals of Black History Month and honoring the 

outstanding contributions of African-American Medal of Honor recipients. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 16, 2017 

Mrs. BEATTY (for herself, Ms. KAPTUR, Ms. FUDGE, Mr. CONYERS, Ms. 

EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON of Texas, Mr. COHEN, Mr. RUSH, Mr. YARMUTH, Mr. BUTTERFIELD, Mr. STIVERS, and Ms. ADAMS) submitted the 

following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Armed 

Services 

RESOLUTION 

Supporting the goals and ideals of Black History Month 

and honoring the outstanding contributions of AfricanAmerican Medal of Honor recipients. 

Whereas the Medal of Honor is the highest award for personal acts of valor in action above and beyond the call 

of duty against an enemy force which can be bestowed 

upon an individual serving in the United States Armed 

Forces; 

Whereas since its first presentation in 1863, 3,515 members 

of the Armed Forces have received the Medal of Honor 

with just less than half being awarded for actions during 

the Civil War; 


emcdonald on DSK9F6TC42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 134 IH 

Whereas African-American members of the Armed Forces 

have played vital roles in military operations throughout 

the history of the United States; 

Whereas 88 African-Americans have been awarded the Medal 

of Honor for military valor; 

Whereas Sergeant William Harvey Carney, a member of 

Company C of the 54th Massachusetts Colored Infantry, 

was the first African-American to earn the Medal of 

Honor when, during the attack on Fort Wagner on July 

18, 1863, he risked his own life above and beyond the 

call of duty to save the American flag while under heavy 

fire and prevent its capture, despite being wounded several times by Confederate fire; 

Whereas William Harvey Carney was not presented with the 

Medal of Honor until nearly 37 years after his acts of 

bravery; 

Whereas in 1993, a study commissioned by the United States 

Army described systematic racial discrimination in the 

criteria for awarding medals during World War II; 

Whereas after an exhaustive review, the study recommended 

seven African-American World War II veterans be awarded the Medal of Honor; and 

Whereas African-American men and women who today serve 

in the Armed Forces play a critical role in the defense 

and security of the United States: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) recognizes Black History Month as an im3 portant time to acknowledge and reflect on the sig4 nificant contributions of African-Americans in the 

5 history of the United States; and 


emcdonald on DSK9F6TC42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 134 IH 

1 (2) honors the outstanding contributions of Af2 rican-American members of the United States 

3 Armed Forces, including the 88 African-Americans 

4 who have been awarded the Medal of Honor for mili5 tary bravery, heroism, and valor. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK9F6TC42PROD with BILLS
#### § 904.2 Scope.

These General Regulations are effective June 1, 1987, and shall apply as the basis for computation of all charges applicable to any sale of power from the Boulder Canyon Project after May 31, 1987. “General Regulations for Power Generation, Operation, Maintenance, and Replacement at the Boulder Canyon Project, Arizona/Nevada” are the subject of a separate rulemaking of the Department of the Interior under 43 CFR part 431. The “General Regulations for Generation and Sale of Power in Accordance with the Boulder Canyon Project Adjustment Act” (1941 General Regulations) dated May 20, 1941, and the “General Regulations for Lease of Power” dated April 25, 1930, terminate May 31, 1987.