alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2023227EN.01004401.xml

| 14.9.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 227/44 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.9.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 227/44

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE No 176/2020

of 30 October 2020

amending Annex XIII (Transport) to the EEA Agreement [2023/1751]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (“the EEA Agreement”), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1477 of 14 October 2020 amending Council Regulation (EEC) No 95/93 as regards the temporary extension of exceptional measures to address the consequences caused by the COVID-19 pandemic (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1477 of 14 October 2020 amending Council Regulation (EEC) No 95/93 as regards the temporary extension of exceptional measures to address the consequences caused by the COVID-19 pandemic (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following indent is added in point 64b (Council Regulation (EEC) No 95/93) of Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘— | 32020 R 1477: Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1477 of 14 October 2020 (OJ L 338, 15.10.2020, p. 4).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32020 R 1477: Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1477 of 14 October 2020 (OJ L 338, 15.10.2020, p. 4).’

Article 2

The text of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1477 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 30 October 2020, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 30 October 2020.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Sabine MONAUNI

---

(1)  
  OJ L 338, 15.10.2020, p. 4.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
§ 960.5-2-11 Tectonics. ( a ) *Qualifying Conditions.* The site shall be located in a geologic setting in which any projected effects of expected tectonic phenomena or igneous activity on repository construction, operation, or closure will be such that the requirements specified in § 960.5-1(a)(3) can be met.
( b ) *Favorable Condition.* The nature and rates of faulting, if any, within the geologic setting are such that the magnitude and intensity of the associated seismicity are significantly less than those generally allowable for the construction and operation of nuclear facilities.
( c ) *Potentially Adverse Conditions.* ( 1 ) Evidence of active faulting within the geologic setting.
( 2 ) Historical earthquakes or past man-induced seismicity that, if either were to recur, could produce ground motion at the site in excess of reasonable design limits.
( 3 ) Evidence, based on correlations of earthquakes with tectonic processes and features, (e.g., faults) within the geologic setting, that the magnitude of earthquakes at the site during repository construction, operation, and closure may be larger then predicted from historical seismicity.
( d ) *Disqualifying Condition.* A site shall be disqualified if, based on the expected nature and rates of fault movement or other ground motion, it is likely that engineering measures that are beyond reasonably available technology will be required for exploratory-shaft construction or for repository construction, operation, or closure.
Editorial Note on Part 180
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 180 appear at 79 FR 75879, Dec. 19, 2014.

§ 180.940 Excluded or exclusion. *Excluded or exclusion* means— ( a ) That a person or commodity is prohibited from being a participant in covered transactions, whether the person has been suspended; debarred; proposed for debarment under 48 CFR part 9, subpart 9.4; voluntarily excluded; or
( b ) The act of excluding a person.
**Alaska**

**Alaska 03 Kodiak**
§ 605.8 Solicitation. ( a ) The Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance number for this program is 81.049, and its solicitation control number is ERFAP 10 CFR part 605.
( b ) An application for a new or renewal award under this solicitation may be submitted at any time to DOE at the address specified in paragraph (c) of this section. New or renewal applications shall receive consideration for funding generally within 6 months but, in any event, no later than 12 months from the date of receipt by DOE.
( c ) Applicants may obtain application forms, described in § 605.9(b), and additional information from the Acquisition and Assistance Management Division, Office of Science, SC, Department of Energy, Washington, DC 20585, (301) 903-5544, and shall submit applications to the same address.
( d ) DOE shall publish annually, in the Federal Register, a notice of the availability of the Office of Science Financial Assistance Program. DOE shall also publish notices or abbreviated notices of availability in trade and professional journals, and news media, and use other means of communication, as appropriate. ( 1 ) Each notice of availability shall cite this part and shall include: ( i ) The Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance number and solicitation control number of the program;
( ii ) The amount of money available or estimated to be available for award;
( iii ) The name of the responsible DOE program official to contact for additional information, and an address where application forms may be obtained;
( iv ) The address for submission of applications; and
( v ) Any evaluation criteria in addition to those set forth in § 605.10.
( 2 ) The notice of availability may also include any other relevant information helpful to applicants such as: ( i ) Program objectives,
( ii ) A project agenda or potential areas for project initiatives,
( iii ) Problem areas requiring additional effort, and
( iv ) Any other information which identifies areas in which grants or cooperative agreements may be made.
( e ) DOE is under no obligation to pay for any costs associated with the preparation or submission of applications.
( f ) DOE reserves the right to fund, in whole or in part, any, all, or none of the applications submitted.
( g ) To be considered for a renewal award under this part, an incumbent recipient shall submit a renewal application as provided in § 605.9 (c) and (h).
[57 FR 40583, Sept. 3, 1992, as amended at 79 FR 76046, Dec. 19, 2014]
# EUR-Lex - 31984D0382 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31984D0382

**84/382/EEC: Council Decision of 19 July 1984 amending the amount of the daily allowance granted to members of the Economic and Social Committee **

*
Official Journal L 208 , 03/08/1984 P. 0052 - 0052 Spanish special edition: Chapter 01 Volume 6 P. 0063 Portuguese special edition Chapter 01 Volume 6 P. 0063 *

*****

COUNCIL DECISION

of 19 July 1984

amending the amount of the daily allowance granted to members of the Economic and Social Committee

(84/382/EEC)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing a single Council and a single Commission of the European Communities, and in particular Article 6 thereof,

Whereas the amount of the daily allowance granted to members of the Economic and Social Committee should be adjusted,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

Council Decision 81/121/EEC of 3 March 1981 on the granting of daily allowances and the reimbursement of travelling expenses of members of the Economic and Social Committee, alternates and experts (1), as amended by Decision 82/868/EEC (2), is hereby amended as follows:

In the first indent of Article 2, 'Bfrs 3 450' is replaced by 'Bfrs 3 600'.

Article 2

This Decision shall take effect on 1 January 1985.

Done at Brussels, 19 July 1984.

For the Council

The President

J. O'KEEFFE

(1) OJ No L 67, 12. 3. 1981, p. 29.

(2) OJ No L 368, 28. 12. 1982, p. 39.
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________

NICHELLE HAYNES,

Petitioner

v.

OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT,

Respondent

______________________

2022-1464

______________________

Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection 

Board in No. AT-844E-21-0553-I-1.

______________________

O R D E R

Upon consideration of Nichelle Haynes having not filed

a motion pursuant to this court’s order dated April 20, 2022

(ECF No. 14),

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

Case: 22-1464 Document: 17 Page: 1 Filed: 05/02/2022
2 HAYNES v. OPM

(1) Pursuant to the court’s April 20, 2022 order, the 

petition for review is dismissed and any pending motions 

are denied as moot. 

(2) Each party shall bear its own costs.

May 2, 2022

 Date

 FOR THE COURT

 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

 Peter R. Marksteiner

 Clerk of Court

Case: 22-1464 Document: 17 Page: 2 Filed: 05/02/2022
# EUR-Lex - 31987L0355 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31987L0355

**Council Directive 87/355/EEC of 25 June 1987 amending Directive 71/316/EEC on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to common provisions for both measuring instruments and methods of metrological control **

*
Official Journal L 192 , 11/07/1987 P. 0046 - 0047 Finnish special edition: Chapter 13 Volume 16 P. 0145 Swedish special edition: Chapter 13 Volume 16 P. 0145 *

*****

COUNCIL DIRECTIVE

of 25 June 1987

amending Directive 71/316/EEC on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to common provisions for both measuring instruments and methods of metrological control

(87/355/EEC)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community, and in particular Article 100 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the Commission (1),

Having regard to the opinion of the European Parliament (2),

Having regard to the opinion of the Economic and Social Committee (3),

Whereas Annex II to Council Directive 71/316/EEC of 26 July 1971 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to common provisions for both measuring instruments and methods of metrological control (4), as last amended by Directive 87/354/EEC (5), must be supplemented by drawings of the distinguishing letters E for Spain, EL for Greece and P for Portugal;

Whereas it is also necessary to amend the said Annex in order to replace the drawing of the distinguishing letters IR for Ireland by IRL,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DIRECTIVE:

Article 1

1. The drawings referred to in point 3.2.1 of Annex II to Directive 71/316/EEC are hereby supplemented by the distinguishing letters E, EL and P and the distinguishing letters IR are hereby replaced by IRL.

2. The models for these distinguishing letters are shown below:

Article 2

1. Member States shall bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive by 31 December 1987. They shall forthwith inform the Commission thereof.

2. Member States shall communicate to the Commission the text of the provisions of national law which they adopt in the field governed by this Directive.

Article 3

This Directive is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Luxembourg, 25 June 1987.

For the Council

The President

H. DE CROO

(1) OJ No C 317, 10. 12. 1986, p. 8.

(2) Opinion delivered on 19 June 1987 (not yet published in the Official Journal).

(3) OJ No C 150, 9. 6. 1987, p. 4.

(4) OJ No L 202, 6. 9. 1971, p. 1.

(5) See page 43 of this Official Journal.
#### JENDRASIAK, Respondent, v. LACKAWANNA BRIDGE CO., Appellant, et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

July 7, 1914.)

Action by Lawrence *1123Jendrasiak against the Lackawanna Bridge Company, impleaded with another.

No opinion. Motion for leave to appeal to Court of Appeals denied, with $10 costs. For former decision, see 148 N. Y. Supp. 1122.
Order entered December 11, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-01092-CR

PRISCILLA DIANE LONG, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 380th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 380-80161-2012

ORDER

The Court REINSTATES the appeal.

On November 30, 2015, we ordered the trial court to make findings regarding why the 

reporter’s record had not been filed. On December 10, 2015, we received the reporter’s record. 

Therefore, in the interest of expediting the appeal, we VACATE the November 30, 2015 order 

requiring findings.

We ORDER the reporter’s record filed as of the date of this order.

Appellant’s brief is due within thirty days of the date of this order. 

/s/ ADA BROWN

JUSTICE
§ 2339.10 What does this part do? This part requires that the award and administration of Social Security Administration (SSA) grants and cooperative agreements comply with Office of Management and Budget (OMB) guidance implementing the portion of the Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1988 (41 U.S.C. 701-707, as amended, hereafter referred to as “the Act”) that applies to grants. It thereby— ( a ) Gives regulatory effect to the OMB guidance (subparts A through F of 2 CFR part 182) for SSA's grants and cooperative agreements; and
( b ) Establishes SSA's policies and procedures for compliance with the Act that are the same as those of other Federal agencies, in conformance with the requirement in 41 U.S.C. 705 for Government-wide implementing regulations.
IV 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 279 

Recognizing Israeli-American heritage and the contributions of the IsraeliAmerican community to the United States. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 26, 2017 

Mr. ZELDIN (for himself and Ms. MENG) submitted the following resolution; 

which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing Israeli-American heritage and the contributions 

of the Israeli-American community to the United States. 

Whereas there are currently up to 800,000 Israeli-Americans 

contributing to our society; 

Whereas the values of Israelis and Israeli-Americans are 

shared American values; 

Whereas Israeli-Americans bring invaluable skills that promote our economy and national security, such as expertise in cybersecurity and water technologies; 

Whereas hundreds of Israeli startups have been brought to 

the United States; 

Whereas the contributions of Israeli-Americans in the fields 

of high-tech and biotech have been invaluable to the 

United States; 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 279 IH 

Whereas Israeli-Americans have helped to form a strong bond 

between the people of the United States and the people 

of Israel, reinforcing our shared values and interests; and 

Whereas countless Israeli-Americans and Israeli-based companies have enriched the society of the United States, including— 

(1) Israeli-based companies operating in the United 

States creating tens of thousands of jobs in the United 

States; 

(2) Israeli engineers based in the United States developing the Intel’s Pentium M chip, which revolutionized 

the mobile computer world; 

(3) Israeli-American engineer Abraham Karem being 

the pioneer of the unmanned aerial vehicle, and described 

by The Economist magazine as the man who ‘‘created the 

robotic plane that transformed the way modern warfare 

is waged and continues to pioneer other airborne innovations’’; and 

(4) Israeli-American businesswoman Safra Catz, 

CEO of Oracle, being one of the most successful female 

business executives in the United States: Now, therefore, 

be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives affirms 

2 that the Israeli-American community has contributed im3 mensely to American society and culture. 

Æ 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### § 200.458 Pre-award costs.

Pre-award costs are those incurred prior to the effective date of the Federal award or subaward directly pursuant to the negotiation and in anticipation of the Federal award where such costs are necessary for efficient and timely performance of the scope of work. Such costs are allowable only to the extent that they would have been allowable if incurred after the date of the Federal award and only with the written approval of the Federal awarding agency. If charged to the award, these costs must be charged to the initial budget period of the award, unless otherwise specified by the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity.

[85 FR 49569, Aug. 13, 2020]
§ 1138.510 Property management system requirements for subawards. ( a ) *Requirement.* A DoD Component's general terms and conditions must address the standards for property management systems that apply to subawards.
( b ) *Award terms and conditions.* To specify the property management system standards that recipients must include in their subawards, a DoD Component's general terms and conditions must use the wording appendix E to this part provides as Section C of SUB Article V.
H. Res. 91 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

February 7, 2017. 

Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall 

be in order to consider in the House the joint resolution 

(H.J. Res. 44) disapproving the rule submitted by the Department of the Interior relating to Bureau of Land Management regulations that establish the procedures used to prepare, revise, or amend land use plans pursuant to the Federal 

Land Policy and Management Act of 1976. All points of 

order against consideration of the joint resolution are waived. 

The joint resolution shall be considered as read. All points of 

order against provisions in the joint resolution are waived. 

The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the 

joint resolution and on any amendment thereto to final passage without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking 

minority member of the Committee on Natural Resources; 

and (2) one motion to recommit. 

SEC. 2. Upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in 

order to consider in the House any joint resolution specified 
2 

•HRES 91 EH 

in section 3 of this resolution. All points of order against consideration of each such joint resolution are waived. Each such 

joint resolution shall be considered as read. All points of 

order against provisions in each such joint resolution are 

waived. The previous question shall be considered as ordered 

on each such joint resolution and on any amendment thereto 

to final passage without intervening motion except: (1) one 

hour of debate equally divided and controlled by the chair 

and ranking minority member of the Committee on Education and the Workforce; and (2) one motion to recommit. 

SEC. 3. The joint resolutions referred to in section 2 of 

this resolution are as follows: 

(a) The joint resolution (H.J. Res. 57) providing for 

congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United 

States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of 

Education relating to accountability and State plans under 

the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965. 

(b) The joint resolution (H.J. Res. 58) providing for 

congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United 

States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of 

Education relating to teacher preparation issues. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications.

 

I, Larry Kravetz, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reportson Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of the UBS-Barclays Commercial MortgageTrust 2013-C6 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

 

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports,taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicingand other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the ExchangeAct periodic reports;

 

4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statementsrequired in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicershave fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and

 

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicingcriteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteriafor asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange ActRules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any materialinstances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably reliedon information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:

 

Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association,as Master Servicer, Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as Special Servicer, U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, U.S. Bank NationalAssociation, as Certificate Administrator, U.S. Bank National Association, as Custodian, Park Bridge Lender Services LLC, as OperatingAdvisor, Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, as Primary Servicer for the Santa Anita Mall Mortgage Loan,Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, as Special Servicer for the Santa Anita Mall Mortgage Loan, DeutscheBank Trust Company Americas, as Trustee for the Santa Anita Mall Mortgage Loan, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Custodian for theSanta Anita Mall Mortgage Loan, and Situs Holdings, LLC, as Operating Advisor for the Santa Anita Mall Mortgage Loan.

 

Dated: March 23, 2020

 

/s/ Larry Kravetz

 

Chief Executive Officer

(senior officer in charge of securitizationof the depositor)
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-50645 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus HUGO DANIEL CHACON-DELEON, also known as Julio Cesar Estrada, also known as Hugo Chacon DeLeonrraga, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 96-CR-276-ALL

- - - - - - - - - - June 17, 1998 Before DAVIS, PARKER, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Hugo Daniel Chacon-Deleon argues that his sentence for illegal reentry following deportation pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) violates principles of due process because the indictment did not allege his prior felony conviction as an element of the offense. This argument is precluded by the Supreme Court’s decision in Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 118 S. Ct. 1219 (1998).No. -2-
AFFIRMED.