alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(logo) DHG

DIXON HUGHES GOODMAN LLP

** **

** **

**Reportof Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

** **

 

To the Board of Managers ofC-III Capital Partners LLC, the 

Sole Member of C-III AssetManagement LLC:

 

 

We have examined management ofC-III Asset Management LLC’s (the “Company”) assertion that the Companycomplied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of theSecurities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB for all transactions forwhich the Company acted as servicer involving first lien commercial mortgageloans (the “Platform”), excluding criteria 1122(d)(1)(iii), 1122(d)(2)(ii),1122(d)(3)(i) – 1122(d)(3)(iv), 1122(d)(4)(ii), 1122(d)(4)(v), 1122(d)(4)(ix)and 1122(d)(4)(xv), which management has determined are not applicable to theactivities performed by the Company with respect to the Platform, included inthe accompanying Management’s Report on Assessment of Compliance withSecurities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB Servicing Criteria datedFebruary 20, 2018 as of and for the year ended December 31, 2017. The Company’smanagement is responsible for its assertion. Our responsibility is to expressan opinion on management’s assertion about the Company’s compliance with thespecified requirements based on our examination.

 

Our examination was conductedin accordance with attestation standards established by the American Instituteof Certified Public Accountants, as adopted by the Public Company AccountingOversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan andperform the examination to obtain reasonable assurance about whethermanagement’s assertion about compliance with the specified requirements isfairly stated, in all material respects. An examination involves performingprocedures to obtain evidence about whether management’s assertion is fairlystated, in all material respects. The nature, timing, and extent of theprocedures selected depend on our judgment, including an assessment of therisks of material misstatement of management’s assertion, whether due to fraudor error. We believe that the evidence we obtained is sufficient andappropriate to provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

 

Our examination does notprovide a legal determination on the Company’s compliance with the specifiedrequirements.

 

In our opinion, management’sassertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned applicableservicing criteria included in the accompanying Management’s Report onAssessment of Compliance with Securities and Exchange Commission’s RegulationAB Servicing Criteria dated February 20, 2018 as of and for the year endedDecember 31, 2017 is fairly stated, in all material respects.

 

 

/s/ Dixon Hughes Goodman LLP

 

Asheville, North Carolina 

February 20, 2018
#### LIGHTFOOT, Appellant, v. HAGGERTY et al., Respondents.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

July 7, 1914.)

Action by William tightfoot against William Bowen Haggerty and others.

No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs.
Editorial Note on Part 9
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 9 appear at 82 FR 52825, Nov. 15, 2017.

§ 9.40 Assessment of fees. ( a ) If the request is expected to require the NRC to assess fees in excess of $25 for search and/or duplication, the NRC will notify the requester that fees will be assessed unless the requester has indicated in advance his or her willingness to pay fees as high as estimated.
( b ) In the notification, the NRC will include the estimated cost of search fees and the nature of the search required and estimated cost of duplicating fees.
( c ) The NRC will encourage requesters to discuss with the NRC the possibility of narrowing the scope of the request with the goal of reducing the cost while retaining the requester's original objective.
( d ) If the fee is determined to be in excess of $250, the NRC will require an advance payment.
( e ) Unless a requester has agreed to pay the estimated fees or, as provided for in paragraph (d) of this section, the requester has paid an estimated fee in excess of $250, the NRC may not begin to process the request.
( f ) If the NRC receives a new request and determines that the requester has previously failed to pay a properly charged fee under the Freedom of Information Act to the NRC or other Federal agency within 30 calendar days of receipt of the bill on a previous request, the NRC may refuse to accept the new request for processing until payment is made of the full amount owed on the prior request, plus any applicable interest assessed as provided in § 9.34.
( g ) Within 10 working days of the receipt of NRC's notice that fees will be assessed, the requester will provide advance payment if required, notify the NRC in writing that the requester agrees to bear the estimated costs, or submit a request for a waiver or reduction of fees pursuant to § 9.41.
[63 FR 2876, Jan. 20, 1998, as amended at 70 FR 34308, June 14, 2005]
#### In the Matter of Board of Education of the City School District of the City of Mount Vernon, Appellant, v. James E. Allen, Jr., as Commissioner of Education of the State of New York, Respondent, and Jeffrey L. King et al., Intervenors-Respondents.

Reynolds, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Albany -County, dismissing, on motion and before answer, appellant’s petition brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 and vacating a temporary stay. The petition seeks to annul and set aside a certain order of the -Commissioner of Education directing appellant to effect not later than November 4, 1968 a reassignment of students in grades one through six in the Mount Vernon School District to overcome purported racial imbalance. The Commissioner’s motion, made pursuant to -CPLR 7804 (subd. [f]) is in the nature of a demurrer and only the -petition may be considered *(Matter of Berlingieri v. O’Connell,*3 A D 2d 762). Moreover, the facts alleged in the petition are deemed true and considered in their most favorable light in support of the petition *(Matter of Hassett*v. *Barnes,*11 A D 2d 1089; 24 Carmody-Wait 2d, New York Practice, § 145:315). Thus the motion must be denied if there is present a triable issue of fact *(Matter of Borko*v. *Giordano,*29 A D 2d 546). The instant petition alleges, *inter alia,*that the Commissioner’s order is arbitrary, capricious and an abuse of discretion because it is financially impossible for the City of Mount Vernon to implement the Commissioner’s plan. An affidavit attached to the petition asserts that implementation of the plan would cost $3,600,000 and -that it is impossible for the city to raise such a sum in addition to the ordinary school budget given the New York State constitutional tax limitation of 2%. Concededly, our review is limited -to the well established rule that the Commissioner’s decisions are final absent a showing of “pure arbitrariness” (Education Law, § 310; *Matter of Vetere*v. *Allen,*15 N Y 2d 259), but to require the implementation of a plan which is financially impossible to obey is clearly “.pure arbitrariness”. Any attack on .the alleged -cost figures advanced by appellant, is not resolvable on the instant motion. As noted, for the -purposes of this motion such figures are deemed uncontrovertible and the sole question here is thus an issue of law, which must he resolved in appellant’s favor. Judgment reversed, on the law, without costs, and motion denied. Respondent’s time to serve an answer to *986the petition is extended until 20 days after service of the order hereon, with notice of entry. Herlihy, J. P., Reynolds, Cooke and Greenblott, JJ., concur in memorandum by Reynolds, J.; Aulisi, J., not voting.
ex10-41.htm


    Exhibit 10.41

    


    Amendment
to

    Employment
Agreement

    


    This Amendment is made effective as of
October 1, 2009 by and between First Solar, Inc. a Delaware corporation having
its principal office at 350 West Washington Street, Suite 600, Tempe, Arizona
85281 (hereinafter “Employer”) and Michael J. Ahearn (hereinafter
“Employee”)

    


    WITNESSETH:

    


    WHEREAS,
Employer and Employee are party to an Employment Agreement dated as of November
3, 2008 (the “Employment Agreement”);

     

    WHEREAS,
effective October 1, 2009, Employee relinquished the position of Chief Executive
Officer but remains employed as Employer’s Chairman of the Board;

     

    WHEREAS,
the parties wish to memorialize this change in status by amending the Employment
Agreement accordingly;

     

    NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the
foregoing premises, and the mutual covenants, terms and conditions set forth
herein, and intending to be legally bound hereby, Employer and Employee hereby
agree that the Employment Agreement is amended as provided herein.

    


    
      	
              1.

            	
              Section
      1.2 of the Employment Agreement is amended to replace the phrase “in its
      initial capacity as Chief Executive Officer” with the phrase “Chairman of
      the Board”.

            


    

    


    
      	
              2.

            	
              Except
      as amended above, the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and
      effect.

            


    

    


    IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Employer has caused
this Agreement to be executed by one of its duly authorized officers and
Employee has individually executed this Agreement, each intending to be legally
bound, as of the date first above written.

    


    
      	
              EMPLOYER

            	
              EMPLOYEE

            
	
               

               

               

              /s/ Michael Sweeney

               

              Michael
      Sweeney

              Chairman,
      Compensation Committee

            	
               

               

               

              /s/ Michael J. Ahearn

               

              Michael
      J. Ahearn

            
	 
      	 
      
	 
      	
              Date:  2/15/10
ATTACHMENT B: IEPS REPORTING SYSTEM PROPOSED SCREENS

FOREIGN LANGUAGE AND AREA STUDIES 

FELLOWSHIPS (FLAS)

POSTGRADUATE

AGGREGATE DATA

CFDA NUMBER: 84.015B

IEPS REPORTING SYSTEM PROPOSED

SCREENS
FLAS Project Director - Postgraduate Aggregate Data for Award Number: _________

The Higher Education Opportunity Act of 2008 requires that the Secretary of Education assist grantees in developing a survey to

administer to students to determine postgraduate employment, education, or training. Grantees are required to administer the survey

once every two years and report the results to the Secretary.

Click on the Post Aggregate Data link below to access the screen to enter your survey data. Click here to view sample survey

questions that you may use. You are welcome to add questions to the survey. The survey will not be administered via IRIS. You

should use your own survey process for reaching former fellows. Only the aggregate results of your survey will be reported in

IRIS.

Click on the List of Fellows link to download an Excel spreadsheet of your fellows. Note that the spreadsheet is a cumulative list

of fellows for successive reporting periods.

Action Award Period Due Date Download

Postgraduate Aggregate Data 2010-2011 10/1/2012 List of Fellows

Postgraduate Aggregate Data 2010-2013 10/1/2014 List of Fellows

Postgraduate Aggregate Data 2010-2015 10/1/2016 List of Fellows

Postgraduate Aggregate Data 2010-2017 10/1/2018 List of Fellows

IEPS - International Resource Information System (IRIS)
FLAS Postgraduate Aggregate Data

Please complete the information below. Click here to view a list of suggested survey questions.

Employment:

How many fellows did you contact?

How many responded?

How many are currently employed?

 Of the number employed, how many indicated they are using the training they received during their FLAS fellowship?

Please fill in the fellows’ employment sectors in the table below.

Sector Bachelor's Master's Doctorate

Elementary or secondary education

Federal government

Foreign government

Graduate study

Higher education

International organization (in U.S.)

International organization (outside U.S.)

Private sector (for profit)

Private sector (non-profit)

State or local government

Unemployed or out of job market

Unknown

U.S. military

Total Students Placed

Total Students Awarded Degrees 0 0 0

IEPS - International Resource Information System (IRIS)
Please indicate the languages studies by the fellows who responded to the survey.

Language Number of Fellows

Education or Training:

Which degrees did the fellows receive as a result of a FLAS support?

Discipline Bachelor's Master's Doctorate

How many received additional degrees or certificates?

Bachelor's Master's Doctorate

How many additional degrees or certificates had a language component?

How many additional degrees or certificates had an area or international studies component?

IEPS - International Resource Information System (IRIS)
IV 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 823 

Commending the outstanding efforts by members of faith-based and community organizations in response to Hurricane Katrina and Hurricane Rita. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 19, 2006 

Mr. GREEN of Wisconsin submitted the following resolution; which was 

referred to the Committee on Government Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Commending the outstanding efforts by members of faithbased and community organizations in response to Hurricane Katrina and Hurricane Rita. 

Whereas on August 29, 2005, Hurricane Katrina and on 

September 24, 2005, Hurricane Rita struck the Gulf 

Coast of the United States, affecting millions of people, 

displacing hundreds of thousands, and causing an unknown number of fatalities in Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, Texas, and Florida; 

Whereas the response by members of faith-based and community organizations to aid in the relief efforts has been immediate and courageous; 

Whereas members of faith-based and community organizations have shown compassion and leadership in responding to the immediate basic needs of the victims of HurriVerDate Aug 31 2005 20:17 May 20, 2006 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6300 E:\BILLS\HR823.IH HR823

sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 823 IH

canes Katrina and Rita, assisting in their resettlement 

across the United States, and organizing and executing 

national fundraising efforts; 

Whereas these faith-based and community organizations are 

in a unique position to respond to many of the needs of 

the victims of Hurricanes Katrina and Rita, working in 

partnership with the Federal Government and State governments; and 

Whereas faith-based and community organizations such as 

Catholic Charities USA, the Salvation Army, the North 

American Baptist Conference, and the American Red 

Cross, along with many other faith-based communities 

from across the Nation, have responded with invaluable 

resources, time, and compassion to aid in Hurricanes 

Katrina and Rita relief efforts: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) commends the outstanding efforts by mem3 bers of faith-based and community organizations in 

4 response to Hurricanes Katrina and Rita, that 

5 struck the Gulf Coast in August and September of 

6 2005; 

7 (2) recognizes that these organizations have 

8 done extraordinary and invaluable work to bring re9 lief to the victims of Hurricanes Katrina and Rita; 

10 (3) encourages all government agencies to con11 sider faith-based and community organizations in 

12 disaster relief and recovery in the future; and 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
3 

•HRES 823 IH

1 (4) thanks the faith-based and volunteer com2 munities for their service. 

Æ 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. James Karhan, Appellant, v. Vincent R. Mancusi, as Warden of Attica State Prison, Respondent.

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: If appellant is entitled to relief, it is not 'by way of habeas corpus (cf. *People*v. *Montgomery,*24 N Y 2d 130). (Appeal from judgment of Wyoming County Court, dismissing writ of habeas corpus.) Present— Goldman, P. J., Marsh, Witmer, Moule and Bastow, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q
FOR PERIOD ENDED 9-30-96 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                            7866
<SECURITIES>                                      3750
<RECEIVABLES>                                    18685
<ALLOWANCES>                                        75
<INVENTORY>                                      10474
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 42596
<PP&E>                                           11897
<DEPRECIATION>                                    3575
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   54694
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            16065
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         32164
<OTHER-SE>                                        1387
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     54694
<SALES>                                           7323
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  7882
<CGS>                                             4116
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     4411
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  3477
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 197
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      1
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (51)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 52
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        52
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.01
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 699 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 699

 Expressing support for designation of February 12, 2018, as ``Darwin 
 Day'' and recognizing the importance of science in the betterment of 
                               humanity.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 18, 2018

   Mr. Himes (for himself, Mr. Raskin, Mr. Kilmer, Ms. Lofgren, Mr. 
 Lowenthal, Ms. Judy Chu of California, Mr. McGovern, Mr. Foster, Ms. 
   Schakowsky, Mr. Huffman, Ms. Norton, Mr. Smith of Washington, Mr. 
 Pocan, and Mr. Schiff) submitted the following resolution; which was 
      referred to the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Expressing support for designation of February 12, 2018, as ``Darwin 
 Day'' and recognizing the importance of science in the betterment of 
                               humanity.

Whereas Charles Darwin's theory of evolution by the mechanism of natural 
        selection, together with the monumental amount of scientific evidence he 
        compiled to support it, provides humanity with a logical and 
        intellectually compelling explanation for the diversity of life on 
        Earth;
Whereas the validity of Darwin's theory of evolution by natural selection is 
        further strongly supported by the modern understanding of the science of 
        genetics;
Whereas it has been the human curiosity and ingenuity exemplified by Darwin that 
        has promoted new scientific discoveries that have helped humanity solve 
        many problems and improve living conditions;
Whereas the advancement of science must be protected from those unconcerned with 
        the adverse impacts of global warming and climate change;
Whereas the teaching of creationism in some public schools compromises the 
        scientific and academic integrity of the United States education 
        systems;
Whereas Charles Darwin is a worthy symbol of scientific advancement on which to 
        focus and around which to build a global celebration of science and 
        humanity intended to promote a common bond among all of Earth's peoples; 
        and
Whereas February 12, 2018, is the anniversary of the birth of Charles Darwin in 
        1809 and would be an appropriate date to designate as ``Darwin Day'': 
        Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) supports the designation of ``Darwin Day''; and
            (2) recognizes Charles Darwin as a worthy symbol on which 
        to celebrate the achievements of reason, science, and the 
        advancement of human knowledge.
                                 <all>
```
226 So.2d 520

#### Application of Claudel WILLIAMS for a writ of habeas corpus v. SUPERINTENDENT OF the STATE INDUSTRIAL SCHOOL FOR COLORED YOUTH.

No. 50139.

Sept. 29, 1969.

In re: Claudel Williams applying for writ of habeas corpus.

Writ refused. The showing made does not warrant the exercise of our original or supervisory jurisdiction.