alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| 1.   | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                                            |   |   |                                                                            |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| /s/      Barry M. Portnoy          |   |   | /s/      John G. Murray            |
| Barry      M. Portnoy                                                           |   |   | John      G. Murray                                                             |
| Managing      Trustee                                                           |   |   | President      and Chief Operating Officer                                      |
|                                                                            |   |   |                                                                            |
|                                                                            |   |   |                                                                            |
| /s/      Adam D. Portnoy           |   |   | /s/      Mark L. Kleifges          |
| Adam      D. Portnoy                                                            |   |   | Mark      L. Kleifges                                                           |
| Managing      Trustee                                                           |   |   | Treasurer      and Chief FinancialOfficer                                       |

----
ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE



Reference is hereby made to that
certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of March 1, 2013, by and among DEUTSCHE MORTGAGE & ASSET RECEIVING CORPORATION,
as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Special Servicer,
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee, PARK BRIDGE LENDER SERVICES LLC, as Operating Advisor and DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY
AMERICAS, as Certificate Administrator, Paying Agent and Custodian with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates,
Series COMM 2013-CCRE6 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings
assigned in the Agreement.

Pursuant to Section 10.11 of this
Agreement, Daniel Marthinsen, Managing Director of Special Servicing and Timothy S. Ryan, Managing Director of Customer Relationship
Management, do hereby certify that:

| | 1. | A review of the activities of the Special Servicer during the period from January 1, 2017 through
December 31, 2017 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has been made
under my supervision, and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Special Servicer has fulfilled all of its
obligations under this Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of Febryary
2018.



|                  |  |                  
|----------------- |  | -----------------
|Daniel Marthinsen |  | Timothy S. Ryan  
|Managing Director |  | Managing Director
|Wells Fargo Bank  |  | Wells Fargo Bank
#### Edward Thompson Company *v.*Henson.

Opinion delivered March 8, 1920.

Courts — jurisdiction of circuit court. — An action on an account for $27 and on nine notes for $10 each *held*not within the jurisdiction of the’ circuit court.

Appeal from Pope Circuit Court; *A. B. Priddy,*Judge;

affirmed.

*Jas. PL. Johnson,*for appellant.

The only question is, did the court have jurisdiction? If it did, it erred in sustaining the demurrer. The contract of the purchase and the notes constituted one entire contract and the court had jurisdiction. 59 Ark. 186; 56 S. W. 374; 78 Ark. 490; 95 S. W. 804; 136 S. W. 177; 26 Ark. 240 ; 28 *Id.*391; 49 *Id.*320; 5 S. W. 339; 10 Ark. 326. The contract was not severable. 13 C. J., p. 564, par. 6, § 530; 10 Ark. 326; 140 S. W. 840; 59 Pa. Sup. 8. The contract was entire. 1 Bouvier, Law Diet., p. 660.

*Hays & Ward,*for appellee.

The amount of each separate demand and not the aggregate determines the jurisdiction. 74 Ark. 615; 83 Ark. 374; 85 *Id.*213. The court had no jurisdiction and the ruling was correct. Cases *supra.*

*505McCulloch, C. J.

Appellant is a foreign corporation engaged in the publication ;of law books, and entered into a written contract with appellee for the sale to the latter of a current set of law reports at a stipulated price. The contract of sale covered 28 volumes of the published reports at the price of $5 per volume and two digests for $7^, and it was stipulated that the payments were to be made, $7 cash, and “the balance in installments of $10 each, to be evidenced by my notes payable every two months from date thereof. ’ ’ The contract also contained a subscription for the -uiipublished volumes. Appellee executed notes in accordance with the contract, and later received four additional volumes of the reports as the same were published, and made payments in the aggregate of $62, leaving a balance of $117, as evidenced by nine of the notes and an open account for $27.

Appellant instituted this action against appellee in the circuit court- of Pope County, exhibiting the original contract and the account and the notes. Appellee entered a plea to the jurisdiction of the court on the ground that the suit was on the notes and the additional account, and was not within the jurisdiction of the court. The circuit court sustained the plea and dismissed the action.

The suit was necessarily on the notes and the open account for $27, all of which constituted separate causes of action within the exclusive jurisdiction of justices of the peace. The facts of the case are identical with the facts in *American Soda Fountain Co.*v. *Battle,*85 Ark. 213, and the decision in that case is conclusive of the present case.

Judgment affirmed.
§ 417.625 What is the scope of a suspension or debarment? If you are suspended or debarred, the suspension or debarment is effective as follows: ( a ) Your suspension or debarment constitutes suspension or debarment of all of your divisions and other organizational elements from all covered transactions, unless the suspension or debarment decision is limited— ( 1 ) By its terms to one or more specifically identified individuals, divisions, or other organizational elements; or
( 2 ) To specific types of transactions.
( b ) Any affiliate of a participant may be included in a suspension or debarment action if the suspending or debarring official— ( 1 ) Officially names the affiliate in the notice; and
( 2 ) Gives the affiliate an opportunity to contest the action.
H. Res. 635 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

November 30, 2017. 

Resolved, That at any time after adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XVIII, 

declare the House resolved into the Committee of the Whole 

House on the state of the Union for consideration of the bill 

(H.R. 4182) to amend title 5, United States Code, to modify 

probationary periods with respect to positions within the competitive service and the Senior Executive Service, and for 

other purposes. The first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. All points of order against consideration of the 

bill are waived. General debate shall be confined to the bill 

and shall not exceed one hour equally divided and controlled 

by the chair and ranking minority member of the Committee 

on Oversight and Government Reform. After general debate 

the bill shall be considered for amendment under the fiveminute rule. The bill shall be considered as read. All points 

of order against provisions in the bill are waived. No amendment to the bill shall be in order except those printed in the 

report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolu-
2 

•HRES 635 EH 

tion. Each such amendment may be offered only in the order 

printed in the report, may be offered only by a Member designated in the report, shall be considered as read, shall be debatable for the time specified in the report equally divided 

and controlled by the proponent and an opponent, shall not 

be subject to amendment, and shall not be subject to a demand for division of the question in the House or in the 

Committee of the Whole. All points of order against such 

amendments are waived. At the conclusion of consideration of 

the bill for amendment the Committee shall rise and report 

the bill to the House with such amendments as may have 

been adopted. The previous question shall be considered as 

ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to final passage 

without intervening motion except one motion to recommit 

with or without instructions. 

SEC. 2. Upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in 

order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 1699) to amend 

the Truth in Lending Act to modify the definitions of a mortgage originator and a high-cost mortgage, to amend the Secure and Fair Enforcement for Mortgage Licensing Act of 

2008 to modify the definition of a loan originator, and for 

other purposes. All points of order against consideration of 

the bill are waived. An amendment in the nature of a substitute consisting of the text of Rules Committee Print 115– 

42 shall be considered as adopted. The bill, as amended, shall 
3 

•HRES 635 EH 

be considered as read. All points of order against provisions 

in the bill, as amended, are waived. The previous question 

shall be considered as ordered on the bill, as amended, and 

on any further amendment thereto, to final passage without 

intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on Financial Services; and (2) one motion to recommit with or without instructions. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
§ 417.1010 Suspending official (USDA supplement to governmentwide definition at 2 CFR 180.1010). ( a ) Suspending official means an agency official who is authorized to impose suspension. The suspending official is either: ( 1 ) The agency head; or
( 2 ) An official designated by the agency head.
( b ) The head of an organizational unit within USDA (*e.g.,* Administrator, Food and Nutrition Service), who has been delegated authority in 7 CFR part 2 of this title to carry out a covered transaction, is delegated authority to act as the suspending official in connection with such transaction. This authority to act as a suspending official may not be redelegated below the head of the organizational unit, except that, in the case of the Forest Service, the Chief may redelegate the authority to act as a suspending official to the Deputy Chief for the National Forest System or an Associate Deputy Chief for the National Forest System.
#### § 200.473 Training and education costs.

The cost of training and education provided for employee development is allowable.

[78 FR 78608, Dec. 26, 2013. Redesignated at 85 FR 49570, Aug. 13, 2020]
#### In the Matter of AIG Centennial Insurance Company, Respondent, v Rangasammy Chunasamy et al., Respondents, and State Farm Mutual Insurance Company, Appellant.

[818 NYS2d 95]

*787In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to permanently stay arbitration, State Farm Mutual Insurance Company appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Conway, R.), dated July 8, 2005, which, after a hearing, inter alia, determined that its disclaimer was untimely as a matter of law and directed it to provide coverage for the subject accident.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

“It is well established that the decision of the fact-finding court should not be disturbed on appeal unless the court’s conclusion could not be reached by any fair interpretation of the evidence” *(Matter of State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v Nater,*22 AD3d 762, 763 [2005]; *see Matter of Allstate Ins. Co. v Mc*Mahon, 251 AD2d 571, 572 [1998]; *Matter of CGU Ins. Co. v Velez,*287 AD2d 624 [2001]). Here, the Supreme Court’s determination that State Farm Mutual Insurance Company (hereinafter State Farm) was first notified of the subject accident in “[l]ate March of 2004,” was supported by a fair interpretation of the evidence. Thus, the Supreme Court properly concluded that State Farm’s failure to disclaim until July 12, 2004 was unreasonable as a matter of law *(see Matter of American Express Prop. Cas. Co. v Vinci,*18 AD3d 655, 656 [2005]; *Pennsylvania Lumbermans Mut. Ins. Co. v D & Sons Constr. Corp.,*18 AD3d 843, 845 [2005]; *Wasserheit v New York Cent. Mut. Fire Ins. Co.,*271 AD2d 439, 440 [2000]; *Matter of Allstate Ins. Co. v Souffrant,*221 AD2d 434 [1995]). Adams, J.P., Rivera, Skelos and Lifson, JJ., concur.
#### § 3373.505 Who in the NEH determines that a recipient who is an individual violated the requirements of this part?

The NEH General Counsel is the agency official authorized to make the determination under 2 CFR 182.505.
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications.

 

 

I, Helaine M. Kaplan, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports onForm 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this reporton Form 10-K of the COMM 2013-CCRE7 Mortgage Trust (the "Exchange Actperiodic reports");

 

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, takenas a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing andother information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the periodcovered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statementsrequired in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except asdisclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilledtheir obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and

 

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicingcriteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports onassessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securitiesrequired to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 ofRegulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as anexhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Anymaterial instances of noncompliance described in such reports have beendisclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied oninformation provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:

 

Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, NationalAssociation, as Master Servicer, Situs Holdings, LLC, as Special Servicer,Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee and CertificateAdministrator, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Custodian, ParkBridge Lender Services LLC, as Operating Advisor, KeyBank National Association(as successor to KeyCorp Real Estate Capital Markets, Inc.), as PrimaryServicer,Computershare Trust Company, National Association, asServicing Function Participant for the Certificate Administrator, andComputershare Trust Company, National Association, as Servicing FunctionParticipant for the Custodian.

 

 

 

 

 

Dated: March 13, 2023

 

 

/s/ Helaine M. Kaplan

Helaine M. Kaplan

President

(senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
#### PEOPLE ex rel. PAIGE, Relator, v. WALDO, Police Com’r, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

January 15, 1915.)

Proceeding by the People of the State of New York, on the relation of George F. Paige, against Rhinelander Waldo, as Police Commissioner of the City of New York.

No opinion. Determination confirmed, and writ dismissed, with $50 costs and disbursements.
§ 784.9 Content of waiver requests. ( a ) Forms (OMB No. 1901-0800) for submitting requests for advance and identified invention waivers, indicating the necessary information, may be obtained from the Contracting Officer or Patent Counsel. All requests for advance and identified invention waivers shall include the following information: ( 1 ) The requestor's identification, business address, and, if represented by Counsel, the Counsel's name and address;
( 2 ) An identification of the pertinent contract or proposed contract and a copy of the contract Statement of Work or a nonproprietary statement which fully describes the proposed work to be performed;
( 3 ) The nature and extent of waiver requested;
( 4 ) A full and detailed statement of facts, to the extent known by or available to the requestor, directed to each of the considerations set forth in §§ 784.4 or 784.5 of this part, as applicable, and a statement applying such facts and considerations to the policies set forth in § 784.3 of this part. It is important that this submission be tailored to the unique aspects of each request for waiver, and be as complete as feasible; and
( 5 ) The signature of the requestor or authorized representative with the following statement: “The facts set forth in this request for waiver are within the knowledge of the requestor and are submitted with the intention that the Secretary or designee rely on them in reaching the waiver determination.”
( b ) In addition to the requirements of paragraph (a) of this section, requests for waiver of identified inventions shall include: ( 1 ) The full names of all inventors;
( 2 ) A statement of whether a patent application has been filed on the invention, together with a copy of such application if filed or, if not filed, a complete description of the invention;
( 3 ) If a patent application has not been filed, any information which may indicate a potential statutory bar to the patenting of the invention under 35 U.S.C. 102 or a statement that no such bar is known to exist; and
( 4 ) Where the requestor is the inventor, written authorization from the applicable contractor or subcontractor permitting the inventor to request a waiver.
( c ) Subject to statutes, DOE regulations, requirements, and restrictions on the treatment of proprietary and classified information; all material submitted in requests for waiver or in support thereof will be made available to the public after a determination on the waiver request has been made, regardless of whether a waiver is granted. Accordingly, requests for waiver should not normally contain information or data that the requestor is not willing to have made public. If proprietary or classified information is needed to make the waiver determination, such information shall be submitted only at the request of Patent Counsel.
§ 170.110 Exceptions to which this part applies. ( a ) *General.* Through a Federal awarding agency's implementation of the guidance in this part, this part applies to recipients, other than those exempted by law or excepted in accordance with paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section, that— ( 1 ) Apply for or receive Federal awards; or
( 2 ) Receive subawards under Federal awards.
( b ) *Exceptions.* ( 1 ) None of the requirements in this part apply to an individual who applies for or receives a Federal award as a natural person (*i.e.,* unrelated to any business or nonprofit organization he or she may own or operate in his or her name).
( 2 ) None of the requirements regarding reporting names and total compensation of a non-Federal entity's five most highly compensated executives apply unless in the non-Federal entity's preceding fiscal year, it received— ( i ) 80 percent or more of its annual gross revenue in Federal procurement contracts (and subcontracts) and Federal financial assistance awards subject to the Transparency Act, as defined at § 170.320 (and subawards); and
( ii ) $25,000,000 or more in annual gross revenue from Federal procurement contracts (and subcontracts) and Federal financial assistance awards subject to the Transparency Act, as defined at § 170.320; and
( 3 ) The public does not have access to information about the compensation of senior executives, unless otherwise publicly available, through periodic reports filed under section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a), 78o(d)) or section 6104 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986.
( c ) *Exceptions for classes of Federal awards or recipients.* OMB may allow exceptions for classes of Federal awards or recipients subject to the requirements of this part when exceptions are not prohibited by statute.
[85 FR 49525, Aug. 13, 2020]
§ 1130.110 Property trust relationship. ( a ) *OMB guidance.* OMB guidance in 2 CFR 200.316 describes the property trust relationship. It states that: ( 1 ) Recipients must hold real property, equipment, and intangible property acquired or improved under grants or cooperative agreements in trust for the beneficiaries of the projects or programs under which the property was acquired or improved; and
( 2 ) A Federal agency may require a recipient to record liens or other appropriate notices of record to indicate that personal or real property was acquired or improved under a grant or cooperative agreement, making the property's use and disposition subject to the award terms and conditions.
( b ) *DoD implementation.* A DoD Component's general terms and conditions must specify that recipients hold title to real property, equipment, and intangible property acquired or improved under DoD grants and cooperative agreements in trust for the beneficiaries of the projects or programs carried out under those awards.
( c ) *Award terms and conditions.* A DoD Component's general terms and conditions: ( 1 ) Must include the wording appendix A to this part provides for paragraph B.1 of PROP Article I, except that a DoD Component may instead reserve Section B if there will be no acquisition or improvement of real property, equipment, or intangible property under awards using those general terms and conditions or subawards under those awards.
( 2 ) May add wording to the reserved paragraph B.2 of the wording of Section B of PROP Article I to require recipients to record liens or other notices of record, as described in paragraph (a) of this section.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 669 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
H. Res. 669

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                     December 20, 2017.
    Resolved, That the following named Member be, and is hereby, elected to the 
following standing committee of the House of Representatives:
    Committee on the Judiciary: Mrs. Demings.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```