alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 35
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 35 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

§ 35.642 Periodic spot-checks for teletherapy units. ( a ) A licensee authorized to use teletherapy units for medical use shall perform output spot-checks on each teletherapy unit once in each calendar month that include determination of— ( 1 ) Timer accuracy, and timer linearity over the range of use;
( 2 ) On-off error;
( 3 ) The coincidence of the radiation field and the field indicated by the light beam localizing device;
( 4 ) The accuracy of all distance measuring and localization devices used for medical use;
( 5 ) The output for one typical set of operating conditions measured with the dosimetry system described in § 35.630(b); and
( 6 ) The difference between the measurement made in paragraph (a)(5) of this section and the anticipated output, expressed as a percentage of the anticipated output (*i.e.*, the value obtained at last full calibration corrected mathematically for physical decay).
( b ) A licensee shall perform measurements required by paragraph (a) of this section in accordance with written procedures established by the authorized medical physicist. That individual need not actually perform the spot-check measurements.
( c ) A licensee shall have the authorized medical physicist review the results of each spot-check within 15 days. The authorized medical physicist shall notify the licensee as soon as possible in writing of the results of each spot-check.
( d ) A licensee authorized to use a teletherapy unit for medical use shall perform safety spot-checks of each teletherapy facility once in each calendar month and after each source installation to assure proper operation of— ( 1 ) Electrical interlocks at each teletherapy room entrance;
( 2 ) Electrical or mechanical stops installed for the purpose of limiting use of the primary beam of radiation (restriction of source housing angulation or elevation, carriage or stand travel and operation of the beam on-off mechanism);
( 3 ) Source exposure indicator lights on the teletherapy unit, on the control console, and in the facility;
( 4 ) Viewing and intercom systems;
( 5 ) Treatment room doors from inside and outside the treatment room; and
( 6 ) Electrically assisted treatment room doors with the teletherapy unit electrical power turned off.
( e ) If the results of the checks required in paragraph (d) of this section indicate the malfunction of any system, a licensee shall lock the control console in the off position and not use the unit except as may be necessary to repair, replace, or check the malfunctioning system.
( f ) A licensee shall retain a record of each spot-check required by paragraphs (a) and (d) of this section, and a copy of the procedures required by paragraph (b), in accordance with § 35.2642.
H. Res. 553

In the House of Representatives, U.S., 

November 16, 2005.

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule 

XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the 

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of 

the bill (H.R. 1065) to establish the United States Boxing 

Commission to protect the general welfare of boxers and to 

ensure fairness in the sport of professional boxing. The first 

reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. All points of order 

against consideration of the bill are waived. General debate 

shall be confined to the bill and shall not exceed one hour, 

with 40 minutes equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on Energy and Commerce and 20 minutes equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the 

Committee on the Judiciary. After general debate the bill 

shall be considered for amendment under the five-minute 

rule. In lieu of the amendments recommended by the Committees on Energy and Commerce and the Judiciary now 
2

•HRES 553 EH 

printed in the bill, it shall be in order to consider as an original bill for the purpose of amendment under the five-minute 

rule the amendment in the nature of a substitute printed in 

part A of the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution. That amendment in the nature of a 

substitute shall be considered as read. All points of order 

against that amendment in the nature of a substitute are 

waived. Notwithstanding clause 11 of rule XVIII, no amendment to that amendment in the nature of a substitute shall 

be in order except those printed in part B of the report of 

the Committee on Rules. Each amendment may be offered 

only in the order printed in the report, may be offered only 

by a Member designated in the report, shall be considered as 

read, shall be debatable for the time specified in the report 

equally divided and controlled by the proponent and an opponent, shall not be subject to amendment, and shall not be 

subject to a demand for division of the question in the House 

or in the Committee of the Whole. All points of order against 

such amendments are waived. At the conclusion of consideration of the bill for amendment the Committee shall rise and 

report the bill to the House with such amendments as may 

have been adopted. Any Member may demand a separate vote 

in the House on any amendment adopted in the Committee 

of the Whole to the bill or to the amendment in the nature 

of a substitute made in order as original text. The previous 
3

•HRES 553 EH 

question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and 

amendments thereto to final passage without intervening motion except one motion to recommit with or without instructions. 

Attest:

Clerk.
§ 71.38 Renewal of a certificate of compliance. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, each Certificate of Compliance expires at the end of the day, in the month and year stated in the approval.
( b ) In any case in which a person, not less than 30 days before the expiration of an existing Certificate of Compliance issued pursuant to the part, has filed an application in proper form for renewal, the existing Certificate of Compliance for which the renewal application was filed shall not be deemed to have expired until final action on the application for renewal has been taken by the Commission.
( c ) In applying for renewal of an existing Certificate of Compliance, an applicant may be required to submit a consolidated application that is comprised of as few documents as possible. The consolidated application should incorporate all changes to its certificate, including changes that are incorporated by reference in the existing certificate.
[80 FR 34012, June 12, 2015]
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                  JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                             16,649
<SECURITIES>                                      643,087
<RECEIVABLES>                                     299,044
<ALLOWANCES>                                            0
<INVENTORY>                                       362,987
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                1,398,395
<PP&E>                                          1,229,939
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (195,060)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  5,893,239
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           2,216,806
<BONDS>                                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                           245
<COMMON>                                            2,965
<OTHER-SE>                                      1,412,363
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    4,477,666
<SALES>                                           809,034
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  809,034
<CGS>                                             499,870
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     657,175
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (107,042)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (411,536)
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (411,536)
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (411,536)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       (0.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       (0.14)
        

</TABLE>
a:link {  font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-weight: bold; color: #0000FF; text-decoration: none}a:visited {  font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-weight: bold; color: #6600FF}a:hover {  font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-weight: bold; color: #6633FF; text-decoration: underline}a:active {  font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-weight: bold; color: #6633FF; text-decoration: underline}
###### Editorial Note on Part 63

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 63 appear at 81 FR 86909, Dec. 2, 2016.

#### § 63.161 Emergency plan for the geologic repository operations area through permanent closure.

DOE shall develop and be prepared to implement a plan to cope with radiological accidents that may occur at the geologic repository operations area, at any time before permanent closure and decontamination or decontamination and dismantlement of surface facilities. The emergency plan must be based on the criteria of § 72.32(b) of this chapter.
§ 800.305 Disclosure. Information received from an applicant by DOE may be available to the public subject to the provision of 5 U.S.C. 552, 18 U.S.C. 1905 and 10 CFR part 1004; provided that: ( a ) Subject to the requirements of law, information such as trade secrets, commercial and financial information, and other information concerning the minority business enterprise that the enterprise submits to DOE in writing, in an application, or at other times throughout the duration of the loan on a privileged or confidential basis, will not be disclosed without prior notice to submitter in accordance with DOE regulations concerning public disclosure of information. Any submitter asserting that the information is privileged or confidential should appropriately identify and mark such information.
( b ) Upon a showing satisfactory to the Secretary that any information or portion thereof obtained under this regulation would, if made public, divulge trade secrets or other proprietary information of the minority business enterprise, the Secretary may not disclose such information.
( c ) This section shall not be construed as authority to withhold information from Congress or from any committee of Congress upon request of the Chairman.
#### § 1108.320 Property.

*Property* means real property and personal property (equipment, supplies, intangible property, and debt instruments), unless stated otherwise.
Exhibit 99.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Wellman, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Thomas M. Duff, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.







|By/s/Thomas M. Duff__
Chief Executive Officer
|---------------------------------------------
#### § 1532.1135 Does CAA or CWA disqualification mean that I must remain ineligible?

You must remain ineligible until the EPA debarring official certifies that the condition giving rise to your conviction has been corrected. If you desire to have your disqualification terminated, you must submit a written request for reinstatement to the EPA debarring official and support your request with persuasive documentation. For information about the process for reinstatement see §§ 1532.1205 and 1532.1300.
(logo) **Situs**                                                                                                                   

101 Montgomery Street, Suite2250

San Francisco, CA 94104

Situs.com

** **

** **

**ANNUAL COMPLIANCE STATEMENT**

**For the period of January1, 2017 through December 31, 2017 (“****Reporting Period****”)**

 

 

Re: Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving CorporationCOMM 2013-CCRE7, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series COMM2013-CCRE7 (the “Transaction”), issued pursuant to the Pooling andServicing Agreement dated as of April 1, 2013 (the “Pooling and ServicingAgreement”), by and among Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation,as Depositor, Midland Loan Services, a division of PNC Bank, National Association,as Master Servicer, Situs Holdings, LLC, as Special Servicer, Wells Fargo Bank,National Association, as Trustee, Certificate Administrator, Paying Agent andCustodian, and Park Bridge Lender Services, LLC, as Operating Advisor

 

Capitalized terms used but notdefined herein have the meanings set forth in the Pooling and ServicingAgreement.

 

SitusHoldings, LLC, as Special Servicer, (a “Certifying Servicer”) isresponsible for assessing compliance as of December 31, 2017 for the ReportingPeriod with the applicable servicing criteria specified in Paragraph (d) ofItem 1122 of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB (the“Relevant Servicing Criteria”).

 

The Special Servicer hasassessed its compliance with the Relevant Servicing Criteria for the ReportingPeriod and has concluded that the Special Servicer has complied, in allmaterial respects, with the Relevant Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2017and for the Reporting Period with respect to the Platform taken as a whole. 

 

As Executive Managing Directorof Situs Holdings, LLC, I certify that:

 

(A) A review of the SpecialServicer’s activities during the Reporting Period and of Situs 

Holdings, LLC’s performanceunder the Pooling and Servicing Agreement has been made under my supervision;and

 

(B) To the best of myknowledge, based on such review, the Special Servicer has fulfilled all its 

obligations under the Poolingand Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the ReportingPeriod. 

 

 

Date: February 28, 2018

 

Situs Holdings, LLC

 

By: /s/ George Wisniewski

George Wisniewski

Executive Managing Director

 

 

EVALUATE   OPTIMIZE  MANAGE
#### Sydelle F. Schoenberg, Appellant, v Gerald H. Schoenberg, Respondent.

In a matrimonial action, the plaintiff wife appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered June 19, 1980, which, *inter alia,*confirmed the sale of the former marital residence. Order reversed, without costs or disbursements, and matter remitted to Special Term for further proceedings in accordance herewith. As the obvious intention of Special Term in directing the sale of the former marital residence was to secure the greatest “net proceeds” for the parties, and since a question has been raised as to whether the terms of the sale submitted for confirmation would accomplish this result, a hearing is required in order to resolve this question, as well as to determine the *bona fides*of the alleged alternate offer by the parties’ son (David M. Schoenberg) to purchase the property for “all cash”. After the hearing, Special Term should require the acceptance of the offer returning the greatest “net proceeds” to the parties, and should further require that the transaction be completed within a specified reasonable time (see *St. John v St. John,*48 AD2d 911). Lazer, J. P., Gibbons, Gulotta and Cohalan, JJ., concur.
# L_2005145EN.01004201.xml

| 9.6.2005 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 145/42 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.6.2005

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 145/42

---

Corrigendum to Council Directive 89/682/EEC of 21 December 1989 amending Directive 86/298/EEC on rear-mounted roll-over protection structures of narrow-track wheeled agricultural and forestry tractors

(
  Official Journal of the European Communities L 398 of 30 December 1989
  )

On page 30, Article 1, point 4:

for:

| ‘4. | in Annex VI, the following point is inserted:






  ‘7.3. | Indication and results of any additional dynamic test’,’ |
| --- | --- | --- |

‘4.

in Annex VI, the following point is inserted:

‘7.3.

Indication and results of any additional dynamic test’,’

read:

| ‘4. | in Annex V, the following point is inserted:






  ‘7.3. | Indication and results of any additional dynamic test’.’ |
| --- | --- | --- |

‘4.

in Annex V, the following point is inserted:

‘7.3.

Indication and results of any additional dynamic test’.’

---
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Samuel Dubington, Appellant, v. J. Edwin La Vallee, as Warden of Clinton Prison, Respondent.

Herlihy, P. J.

The defendant was sentenced, upon his plea of guilty, for attempted violation of subdivision 2 of section 1751 of the Penal Law, which is possession of a narcotic with intent to sell. The defendant was indicted for a violation of the Public Health Law with respect to narcotic drugs, as a felony. At the time (March 23, 1965) the defendant withdrew his plea of not guilty he entered a plea of guilty “ to the crime of attempted possession of narcotic drugs as a felony to *cover this indictment*”. Approximately two months thereafter (May 18, 1965) he was brought before the court for sentencing and the court, after carefully advising and questioning the defendant as to his guilty plea, stated: *“*This defendant was indicted for violation of the Public Health Law with respect to narcotic drugs, a felony, two counts. He pleaded guilty on the 23rd of March, 1965, to attempted violation of 1751 *867subdivision 2 of the Penal Law, as a felony.” From this colloquy it is, to say the least, difficult to understand how on August 18, 1969 (date of petition) the defendant, who raised no objection at the time, now contends that he was pleading to a different subdivision of section 1751. He was represented by counsel at the time of his plea and sentence; his rights were fully and carefully explained to him and it is clear that his attorney knew that his client was pleading to a felony. There is no merit to the other alleged errors, particularly as to his being properly sentenced as a second offender. Judgment affirmed, without costs. Herlihy, P. J., Reynolds, Staley, Jr., Greenblott and Cooke, JJ., concur in memorandum by Herlihy, P. J.
J-S47032-16

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37

DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST CO., 

AS TRUSTEE OF RESIDENTIAL ASSET 

SECURITIZATION TRUST 2006-A214CB 

MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH 

CERTIFICATES SERIES 2006-N UNDER 

POOLING & SERVICING AGREEMENT 

DATED AS OF 10/1/06

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF

PENNSYLVANIA

Appellee

v.

ROBERT KEELER

Appellant No. 1534 MDA 2015

Appeal from the Order Entered August 10, 2015

In the Court of Common Pleas of Franklin County

Civil Division at No(s): 2008-1211

BEFORE: SHOGAN, J., LAZARUS, J., and JENKINS, J. 

JUDGMENT ORDER BY LAZARUS, J.: FILED JULY 06, 2016

Robert Keeler appeals from the order of the Court of Common Pleas of 

Franklin County that denied his petition to set aside a sheriff’s sale. For the 

following reasons, we dismiss the appeal.

Keeler’s pro se brief fails to comply with almost all applicable 

Pennsylvania Rules of Appellate Procedure. Pa.R.A.P. 2101 provides that 

where defects in the appellant’s brief or reproduced record are substantial, 

the appeal may be dismissed. Here, Keeler did not file a reproduced record 

nor did he file an application seeking to be excused from producing one. 

See Pa.R.A.P. 2151(d).
J-S47032-16

- 2 -

Furthermore, Pa.R.A.P. 2117 requires a statement of the form of 

action followed by a brief procedural history, a brief history of any prior 

determination in the same case, the names of the judges whose 

determinations are to be reviewed and a condensed chronological statement 

of the facts. Instead, Keeler’s brief contains an introductory note, a 

reference to the trial court’s Pa.R.A.P. 1925(a) opinion, a statement of two 

general issues and a discussion of the grant of summary judgment entered 

more than five years ago. 

Keeler’s brief fails to include a summary of argument, see Pa.R.A.P. 

2118. The argument section fails to comply with Pa.R.A.P. 2119 in that it 

consists of 28 numbered paragraphs with no clear connection or reference to 

the record. While the brief contains references to four cases, only one is a 

published decision, and it is from a federal bankruptcy court. Accordingly, 

none of the cases has precedential value in this Court.

Keeler’s brief contains no table of contents, see Pa.R.A.P. 2174(a), 

and no table of citations, see Pa.R.A.P. 2174(b).

Finally, because Keeler’s brief fails to explain why the trial court 

abused its discretion in denying his petition to set aside the sheriff’s sale, we 

are unable to engage in meaningful review. See Branch Banking & Trust 

v. Gesiorski, 904 A.2d 939 (Pa. Super. 2009) (dismissal appropriate where 

numerous defects in pro se brief prevented court from conducting 

meaningful appellate review).

Appeal dismissed. 
J-S47032-16

- 3 -

Judgment Entered.

Joseph D. Seletyn, Esq.

Prothonotary

Date: 7/6/2016
§ 75.27 Requirements for facilities, locations, and nuclear material outside facilities after issuance of IAEA exemptions. ( a ) *Licensees of facilities.* After the NRC has notified a licensee of a facility under § 75.26(c) that the IAEA has approved the exemption requested under § 75.26(a) of this part, the licensee: ( 1 ) Shall submit reports to the NRC pursuant to §§ 75.6(c) and 75.31(a); and
( 2 ) Shall not export any nuclear material identified under § 75.26 until the NRC notifies the licensee that IAEA safeguards under the U.S.-IAEA Safeguards Agreement have been re-applied.
( b ) *Licensees of locations.* A licensee of a location shall provide annual updates pursuant to § 75.11(c) following notification from the NRC that the IAEA has approved the exemption requested under § 75.26.
( c ) *Possessors of nuclear material outside facilities.* After the NRC has notified a possessor of nuclear material outside facilities under § 75.6(c) that the IAEA has approved the exemption requested under § 75.26(a), a possessor of nuclear material outside facilities: ( 1 ) Shall submit reports to the NRC pursuant to §§ 75.6(e) and 75.31(b); and
( 2 ) Shall not export out of the U.S. Caribbean Territories any nuclear material identified under § 75.26 until the NRC notifies the possessor that IAEA safeguards under the U.S.-IAEA Caribbean Territories Safeguards Agreement have been re-applied.
( d ) *Prohibition against commingling of nuclear material in storage.* Licensees of facilities, licensees of locations, and possessors of nuclear material outside facilities shall not store nuclear material exempted under § 75.26 together with nuclear material subject to Safeguards Agreements.
( e ) Nuclear material exempted from IAEA safeguards under § 75.26 is not subject to inspections by the IAEA.
#### § 200.335 Requests for transfer of records.

The Federal awarding agency must request transfer of certain records to its custody from the non-Federal entity when it determines that the records possess long-term retention value. However, in order to avoid duplicate recordkeeping, the Federal awarding agency may make arrangements for the non-Federal entity to retain any records that are continuously needed for joint use.