alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 231 

Celebrating the importance of the 15th Anniversary of the Arab Peace Initiative as a meaningful effort by Arab countries to the commitment of 

peace in the Middle East. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 27, 2017 

Mr. HASTINGS submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Foreign Affairs 

RESOLUTION 

Celebrating the importance of the 15th Anniversary of the 

Arab Peace Initiative as a meaningful effort by Arab 

countries to the commitment of peace in the Middle 

East. 

Whereas the Arab Peace Initiative was unanimously endorsed 

by the Arab League on March 28, 2002, as a proposal 

to end the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict; 

Whereas the Arab Peace Initiative endorsed normalized relations between regional Arab and Muslim-majority countries and the State of Israel; 

Whereas the Arab Peace Initiative established a regionally 

endorsed baseline for negotiations as a means of supporting gradual progress in regional cooperation among 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 231 IH 

regional Arab and Muslim-majority countries, the United 

States, the State of Israel, and the Palestinian Authority; 

Whereas Prime Minister of Israel Binyamin Netanyahu on 

May 26, 2015, stated that ‘‘there are positive aspects 

. . .’’ to the Arab Peace Initiative and that the ‘‘general 

idea—to try to reach understanding with leading Arab 

countries—is a good idea’’; and 

Whereas a lasting two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian 

conflict is essential to achieving long-term peace and security in the Middle East: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) recognizes the importance of the 15th Anni3 versary of the Arab Peace Initiative as a meaningful 

4 effort by regional Arab countries to support peace in 

5 the Middle East and to bring an end to the Israeli6 Palestinian conflict; 

7 (2) commends regional Arab and Muslim-major8 ity countries that have taken steps to facilitate the 

9 end of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict; 

10 (3) congratulates the Hashemite Kingdom of 

11 Jordan on their presidency of the Arab League on 

12 March 9, 2017; 

13 (4) supports the efforts of regional Arab and 

14 Muslim-majority countries to strengthen regional se15 curity cooperation and stability through discussions 

16 with the State of Israel; and 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 231 IH 

1 (5) urges the State of Israel, the Palestinian 

2 Authority, and regional Arab and Muslim-majority 

3 countries to engage in bilateral and multilateral ne4 gotiations to advance the Israeli-Palestinian peace 

5 process and support the normalization by Arab and 

6 Muslim-majority countries of relations with the 

7 State of Israel. 

Æ 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Subpart 1836.2—Special Aspects of Contracting for Construction    **Parent topic:** PART 1836—CONSTRUCTION AND ARCHITECT-ENGINEER CONTRACTS1836.203 Government estimate of construction costs.(NASA supplements paragraph (c))       (c)(i) If the acquisition is by sealed bidding, the contracting officer shall file a sealed copy of the detailed Government estimate with the bids until bid opening. After the bids are read and recorded, the contracting officer shall read the estimate, and record it in the same detail as the bids.          (ii) If the acquisition is by negotiation, the contracting officer may disclose the overall amount of the Government estimate after award upon request of offerors.1836.213-370 Additive and deductive items.       When it appears that funds available for a project may be insufficient for all the desired features of construction, the contracting officer may provide in the invitation for bids for a first or base bid item covering the work generally as specified and one or more additive or deductive bid items progressively adding or omitting specified features of the work in a stated order of priority. In such case, the contracting officer, before the opening of bids, shall record in the contract file the amount of funds available for the project and determine the low bidder and the items to be awarded in accordance with the provision at 1852.236–71, Additive or Deductive Items.
#### In the Matter of Susan Kaplan, Respondent, for the Dissolution of Med-Crest Management Services, Inc., Appellant.

Order Supreme Court, New York County, entered April 30, 1980, which, *inter alia,*granted petitioner’s application for dissolution of Med-Crest Management Services, Inc., unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent of reversing the granting of the application and the dissolution; the application is granted only to the extent of directing a hearing on the issues raised by the papers, and, as so modified, affirmed, without costs and disbursements, and the matter remanded for such hearing. Petitioner, a 40% minority shareholder of issued and outstanding shares, commenced this proceeding for judicial dissolution of Med-Crest Management Services, Inc., on the ground that the assets of the corporation were being looted, wasted and diverted for noncorporate purposes. Respondents, owners of the remaining 60% of the issued and outstanding shares, in opposition accuse petitioner of conspiring to destroy the corporation for the benefit of a newly formed competitor in which petitioner has an interest. The instant appeal does not involve a deadlocked board of directors or situation where a corporation cannot function on a day-to-day basis because of opposition between parties in equal control. Thus, it was improper for Special Term to direct dissolution without a hearing on the disputed issues (see *Liebert*v *Clapp,*13 NY2d 313; cf. *Matter of Gordon & Weiss, Inc.,*32 AD2d 279). Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Fein, Sullivan, Lupiano and Lynch, JJ.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.1

SUMMARY OF PERFORMANCE GOALS AND BUSINESS CRITERIA FOR PAYMENT OF AWARDS

      Executive bonus targets for the executive group are set between the 50th
and 75th percentile of market data as an average. The named executives were
assigned the following target annual bonus amounts:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                 TARGET ANNUAL
                                                                 BONUS AMOUNT
                                                                ---------------
<S>                                                             <C>
Scott C. Grout, President and Chief Executive Officer              $328,300
Julia A. Harper, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary             $140,500
Christian A. Lepiane, Vice President of Worldwide Sales            $140,500
Keith Lambert, Vice President of Operations and Manufacturing      $125,000
</TABLE>

      Actual bonus payouts are calculated and paid semi-annually and are based
on achievement of planned operating income, as well as the following parameters:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
PARAMETER                PAYOUT                                     WEIGHT
----------------------   -------------------------------------  -------------
<S>                      <C>                                    <C>
Individual objectives    Payout from 0 - 200% based on results        50%
Design win target        Payout from 0 - 200% based on results        20%
Revenue target           Payout from 0 - 200% based on results        15%
Gross margin target      Payout from 0 - 200% based on results        15%
</TABLE>
### Reported Emissions and Product Content

Table 1

. Reported Emissions and Product Content of PFOA, Precursors, and Higher Homologues from U.S. Operations
Company Six th

Reporting

Year Chemical

Category Emissions Product Content

R eleases to all

media from FP

and Telomer Manufacturing (kg) kg of

release / kg of product produced Dispersions

(ppm wet

weight basis) Other

Fluoropolymers (ppm dry

- weight basis) Telomers

(ppm dry

weight basis,

unless stated otherwise)

Asahi 2 0 1 1 PFOA, PFOA

salts and Higher Homologues 0 Not Applicable 0 0 Not Applicable

Precursors Not ApplicableTable 2

. Reported Emissions and Product Content of PFOA, Precursors, and Higher Homologues from Non U.S. Operations

Com pany Sixth

Reporting

Year Chemical

Category Emissions Product Content

Releases to all

media from FP

and Telomer Manufacturing (kg) kg of

release / kg of product produced Dispersions

(ppm wet

weight basis) Other

Fluoropolymers (ppm dry

- weight basis) Te lomers

(ppm dry

weight basis,

unless stated otherwise)

Asahi 20 1 1 PFOA, PFOA

salts and Higher Homologues 237 For FP

Production: < 1 kg / 100 kg Not

Applicable 0.08 Negligible compared to

precursors

Precursors 468 For Telomer

Production: < 1 kg / 100 kg Not

Applicable Not Applicable Average 50% (range:

0

- 100%)

### Reported Percent Reductions in Emissions and Product Content

Table 3

. Reported Percent Reductions in Emissions and Product Content of PFOA, Precursors, a nd Higher Homologues from U.S. Operations

Company Six th

Reporting

Year Chemical

Category % Reduction in Emissions % Reduction in Product Content

% Reductions in total quantity of chemical(s) released from baseline year Fluoropolymer Dispersions Other

Fluoropolymers Telomer based

products

Asahi 20 1 1 PFOA,

PFOA salts and Higher Homologues 100 % 100 % 100% Not Applicable

Precursors Not ApplicableTable 4

. Reported Percent Reductions in Emissions and Product Content of PFOA, Precursors, and Higher Homologues from Non U.S. Operations

Company Six th

Reporting

Year Chemical

Category % Reduction in Emissions % Reduction in Product Content

% Reductions in total quantity of chemical(s) released from baseline year Fluoropolymer

D ispersions Other

Fluoropolymers Telomer based

products

Asahi 20 1 1 PFOA,

PFOA salts and Higher Homologues 9 8 % 100 % PFOA content in this product is negligible as compared to that in dispersions Negligible as

compared to

precursors

Precursors 88 % Not Appl icable Not Applicable 8 8 %

### Accomplishment Table

Company Facilities R eductions

Emissions Product Content

US 100% 100%

Non

- US 95 % 88 %

Global 96 % 88 %
| 1.   | I      am the Chief Executive Officer of Rudy  Nutrition. |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | Attached      to this certification is Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008, a      periodic report (the “periodic report”) filed by the issuer with the      Securities Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the      Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), which contains      consolidated financial statements. |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 3.   | I      hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,  that |
|----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| a.   | The      periodic report containing the consolidated financial statements fully      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange      Act, and |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| b.   | The      information in the periodic report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of operations      of the issuer for the periodspresented. |
|----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|              |        |                                                           |
|-------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------|
|              |   |                                                           |   |
| May      16, 2008 | By:    | /s/ Daniel E.      Ruettiger                                   |   |
|              |   | Daniel      E. Ruettiger                                       |   |
|              |   | Chief      Executive Officer(Principal      Executive Officer) |   |
|              |   |                                                           |   |

----
<PAGE>



                            STATEMENT UNDER OATH FOR
                             CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

I, Phillip W. Arneson, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Sorrento Networks
Corporation (the "Company"), certify pursuant to Rule 13(a)-14(b) or Rule
15(d)-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
that (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly
period ended April 30, 2004 fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information
contained th such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operation of the Company


                                             Subscribed and sworn to
                                             before me this 14 day of June, 2004

          /s/ PHILLIP W. ARNESON                       /s/ Claudia Warner
       ----------------------------          -----------------------------------
Name:  Phillip W. Arneson                    Notary Public
Date:  June 11, 2004                         Seal


A signed original of this written statement required by 18 U.S. C 1350 has been
provided to Sorrento Networks Corporation and will be retained by Sorrento
Networks Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.


                                       28
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           5,699
<SECURITIES>                                    36,959
<RECEIVABLES>                                   25,865
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (1,076)
<INVENTORY>                                        439
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                76,809
<PP&E>                                          14,485
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (7,002)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 108,848
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14,882
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            24
<OTHER-SE>                                      93,365
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   108,848
<SALES>                                         27,593
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                27,593
<CGS>                                            8,660
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    8,660
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                12,931
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  22
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,483
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,524
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,959
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,959
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.19
        

</TABLE>
#### § 2424.1100 What is a limited denial of participation?

A limited denial of participation excludes a specific person from participating in a specific program, or programs, within a HUD field office's geographic jurisdiction, for a specific period of time. A limited denial of participation is normally issued by a HUD field office, but may be issued by a Headquarters office. The decision to impose a limited denial of participation is discretionary and based on the best interests of the federal government.
(logo) C-III Asset Management

 

 

OFFICER’S CERTIFICATE

C-III Asset Management LLC

 

 

The undersigned, Kevin Donahue, President of C-III Asset Management LLC *(f/k/a Centerline Servicing LLC)*, the Special Servicer under that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of March 1, 2013, relating to the **J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Trust 2013-C10, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2013-C10**(the “Pooling and Servicing Agreement”), hereby certifies as follows:

 

·                     a review of the activities of the Special Servicer and of its performance under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement during the calendar year 2014 (the “Reporting Period”) has been made under the undersigned’s supervision;

 

·                     to the best of the undersigned’s knowledge, based on such review, the Special Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

Capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings given them in the Pooling and Servicing Agreement.

 

 

**IN WITNESS WHEREOF,**as of the 19th day of March, 2015, I have hereunto signed my name.

 

 

 

                                                                                                        /s/ Kevin Donahue                                   

                                                                                                        **Kevin Donahue**, President

C-III Asset Management LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
§ 603.1020 File documents. The award file should include an analysis which: ( a ) Briefly describes the program and details the specific commercial benefits that should result from the project supported by the TIA. If the recipient is a consortium that is not formally incorporated, a copy of the signed articles of collaboration should be attached.
( b ) Describes the process that led to the award of the TIA, including how DOE solicited and evaluated proposals and selected the one supported through the TIA.
( c ) Explains the basis for the decision that a TIA was the most appropriate instrument, in accordance with the factors in Subpart B of this part. The explanation must include the answers to the relevant questions in § 603.225(a) through (d).
( d ) Explains how the recipient's cost sharing contributions was valued in accordance with §§ 603.530 through 603.555. For a fixed-support TIA, the file must document the analysis required (see § 603.560) to set the fixed level of Federal support; the documentation must explain how the recipient's minimum cost share was determined and how the expenditures required to achieve the project outcomes were estimated.
( e ) Documents the results of the negotiation, addressing all significant issues in the TIA's provisions.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Wayne J. Guza, Appellant.

Appeals by defendant, as limited by his brief, from two sentences of the County Court, Suffolk County, one imposed July 26,1979, and the other imposed July 30, 1979, upon his convictions of burglary in the second degree, upon his pleas of guilty, the sentences being concurrent indeterminate terms of imprisonment of from three to six years, as a second felony offender. Sentences affirmed. We have reviewed defendant’s arguments with respect to the alleged unconstitutionality of section 70.06 of the Penal Law and find them to be without merit. *(See People v Butler,*46 AD2d *422; People v Brown,*46 AD2d 255; *People v Gonzales,*54 AD2d 946.) Hopkins, J. P., Damiani, Lazer and Cohalan, JJ., concur.
DISMISS; and Opinion Filed February 13, 2017.

S

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-17-00022-CV

ASWAN TRADING, Appellant

V.

MUSTAFEEN ABBAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 162nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-13-11338

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Lang, Fillmore, and Schenck

Opinion by Justice Schenck

Before the Court is appellant’s February 6, 2017 agreed motion to dismiss appeal. We 

grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). We order each party to 

bear its own cost, if any, of this appeal.

170022F.P05

/DAVID J. SCHENCK/

DAVID J. SCHENCK

JUSTICE
–2–

Court of Appeals

S

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

ASWAN TRADING, Appellant

No. 05-17-00022-CV V.

MUSTAFEEN ABBAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 162nd Judicial District 

Court, Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-13-11338.

Opinion delivered by Justice Schenck, 

Justices Lang and Fillmore participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED.

It is ORDERED that each party bear its own costs, if any, of this appeal.

Judgment entered this 13th day of February, 2017.