alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### ROSENTHAL, Respondent, v. RACHLIN, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

December 18, 1914.)

Action by Louis C. Rosenthal, as administrator, etc., of Henry Rosenthal, deceased, against Rose Rachlin.

No opinion. Judgment and order of the County Court of Kings County affirmed, with costs.
#### § 1401.115 Are any of my Federal assistance awards exempt from this part?

This part does not apply to any award if the Director, Office of Acquisition and Property Management (PAM), determines that the application of this part would be inconsistent with the international obligations of the United States or the laws or regulations of a foreign government.
#### § 182.655 Individual.

Individual means a natural person.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### U.S. Customs and Border Protection

# AGENCY:

U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland Security.

# ACTION:

Notice of accreditation of Dixie Services, Inc., as a commercial laboratory.

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to 19 CFR 151.12, Dixie Services, Inc., 1706 First Street, Galena Park, TX 77547, has been accredited to test petroleum and petroleum products for customs purposes, in accordance with the provisions of 19 CFR 151.12. Anyone wishing to employ this entity to conduct laboratory analyses should request and receive written assurances from the entity that it is accredited by the U.S. Customs and Border Protection to conduct the specific test requested. Alternatively, inquiries regarding the specific test this entity is accredited to perform may be directed to the U.S. Customs and Border Protection by calling (202) 344-1060. The inquiry may also be sent to                         *cbp.labhq@dhs.gov.*                         Please reference the website listed below for a complete listing of CBP approved gaugers and accredited laboratories.                         *http://cbp.gov/​xp/​cgov/​import/​operations_​support/​labs_​scientific_​svcs/​commercial_​gaugers/​.*

# DATES:

The accreditation of Dixie Services, Inc., as commercial laboratory became effective on September 3, 2009. The next triennial inspection date will be scheduled for September 2012.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Anthony Malana, Laboratories and Scientific Services, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Suite 1500N, Washington, DC 20229, 202-344-1060.

Dated: February 4, 2010.

Ira S. Reese,

Executive Director, Laboratories and Scientific Services.

[FR Doc. 2010-3238 Filed 2-18-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9111-14-P
JOHNP. BAKER, Plaintiff, 

### UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FORTHE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 

# FILED NO'J \ 8 2010 o' trlct &Bankruptcy Clerk, u'Stl\' ISOistrict ot Columbia courts tor e

v. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action NolO 

# 1977 u.s. SENATE, 

### et al., Defendants.


### MEMORANDUM OPINION This matter is before the Court onplaintiffs application to proceed 

### informapauperis and 

### pro se complaint. The Court will grant the application, and dismiss the complaint. Plaintiffalleges that the Anti-Terrorism and Effective DeathPenaltyAct of 1996 ("AEDPA") violates the United States Constitution by setting a time limit within which a prisonermust seekhabeas relief. He demands an Order directing the Congress to repeal these
measures and directing the United States District Court for the District ofArizona to review his habeas petition. Even ifthis Court were authorized to grant the reliefpetitioner demands and if the defendants were amenable to suit, his complaint must be dismissed. The Supreme Court has held that the AEDPA "does not preclude [its review of] an application for habeas corpus relief, although it does affect the standards governing the granting ofsuch relief," 

### Felker v. 

### Turpin, 518 U.S. 651, 654 (1996), and "[t]he added restrictions which the [AEDPA] places on second habeas petitions
... do not amount to a 'suspension' ofthe writ contrary to Article I, 

### § 9" ofthe United States Constitution, 

### id. at 664. 1 Because the complaint
"Theprivilege ofthe Writ ofHabeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases ofRebellion or Invasion the public Safetymayrequire it." U.S. CONST. art. I, 

### § 9, cl. 2.fails to state a claim upon which reliefcan be granted, it must be dismissed. 

### See 28 U.S.C. 

### § 1915A(b)(1). An Order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.

DATE: 

# tb**~** ZoIO
Editorial Note on Part 70
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 70 appear at 81 FR 86910, Dec. 2, 2016.

§ 70.92 Criminal penalties. ( a ) Section 223 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, provides for criminal sanctions for willful violation of, attempted violation of, or conspiracy to violate, any regulation issued under sections 161b, 161i, or 161o of the Act. For purposes of section 223, all the regulations in part 70 are issued under one or more of sections 161b, 161i, or 161o, except for the sections listed in paragraph (b) of this section.
( b ) The regulations in part 70 that are not issued under sections 161b, 161i, or 161o, for the purposes of section 223 are as follows: §§ 70.1, 70.2, 70.4, 70.5, 70.6, 70.8, 70.11, 70.12, 70.13, 70.14, 70.17, 70.18, 70.23, 70.31, 70.33, 70.34, 70.35, 70.37, 70.66, 70.73, 70.76, 70.81, 70.82, 70.63, 70.91, and 70.92.
[57 FR 55077, Nov. 24, 1992. Redesignated and amended at 65 FR 56226, Sept. 18, 2000]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                            1372
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      176
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  1548
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    1548
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               43
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                        1505
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      1548
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   328
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       25
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   121
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 104
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     78
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 78
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  (245)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (167)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (5.58)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (5.58)
        

</TABLE>
#### § 960.3-2-3 Recommendation of sites for characterization.

After the nomination of at least five sites as suitable for site characterization for the selection of the first repository, the Secretary shall recommend in writing to the President not less than three candidate sites for such characterization. The recommendation decision shall be based on the available geophysical, geologic, geochemical, and hydrologic data; other information; associated evaluations and findings reported in the environmental assessments accompanying the nominations; and the considerations specified below, unless the Secretary certifies that such available data will not be adequate to satisfy applicable requirements of the Act in the absence of further preliminary borings or excavations. On the basis of the evidence and in accordance with the siting provision specifying the basis for site evaluations in § 960.3-1-5, the sites nominated as suitable for characterization shall be considered as to their order of preference as candidate sites for characterization. Subsequently, the siting provisions specifying diversity of geohydrologic settings, diversity of rock types, and, after the first repository, consideration of regionality in §§ 960.3-1-1, 960.3-1-2, and 960.3-1-3, respectively, shall be considered to determine a final order of preference for the characterization of such sites. Considering this order of preference together with the available siting alternatives specified in the Act, the sites recommended as candidate sites for characterization shall offer, on balance, the most advantageous combination of characteristics and conditions for the successful development of repositories at such sites. The process for the recommendation of sites as candidate sites for characterization for the selection of any subsequent repository shall be the same as that specified above for the first repository.
§ 800.304 Default. ( a ) In the event that the borrower fails to perform the terms and conditions of the loan, the borrower shall be in default and the Secretary shall have the right, at the Secretary's option, to accelerate the indebtedness and demand full payment of all principal and interest amounts outstanding under the loan.
( b ) No failure on the part of the Secretary to make demand at any time shall constitute a waiver of the rights held by the Secretary.
( c ) Upon demand by the Secretary, the borrower shall have a period of not more than 30 days from the date of receipt of the Secretary's demand to make payment in full.
( d ) In the event that the failure on the part of the borrower to perform the terms and conditions of the loan does not constitute an intentional act, but is brought about as a result of circumstances largely beyond the control of the borrower, or is deemed by, the Secretary to be insubstantial, the Secretary may elect, at the Secretary's option, to defer such performance and/or restructure the repayment required by the loan agreement in any mutually acceptable manner.
( e ) Should the borrower fail to pay after demand as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, and no deferral or restructuring is agreed to by the Secretary as provided in paragraph (d) of this section, the Secretary shall undertake collection in accordance with the terms of the loan agreement and the applicable law.
PGI 222.1704 Violations and remedies.

(1) If the contracting officer receives information indicating that the contractor, a contractor

employee, a subcontractor, or a subcontractor employee has failed to comply with the requirements

of the clause at FAR 52.222-50, the contracting officer

shall—

(i) Through the contracting officer's local commander or other designated representative,

immediately notify the Combatant Commander responsible for the geographical area in which the

incident has occurred; and

(ii) Provide information about any investigation and enforcement to—

(A) Program Manager, DoD CTIP Policy and Programs Support at https://ctip.defense.gov/ or by

email to dodctip@mail.mil; and

(B) Defense Pricing and Contracting (Contract Policy) by email to osd.pentagon.ousd-a-s.mbx.dpccp@mail.mil.

(2) Reports may be made to the DoD Inspector General Hotline at http://www.dodig.mil/hotline/ or

800-424-9098, first and foremost.

(3) Reports also may be made to the National Human Trafficking Hotline at 1-888-373-7888 or to the

Hotline website at https://humantraffickinghotline.org/.

Parent topic: PGI 222.17 -COMBATING TRAFFICKING IN PERSONS
#### § 1108.225 Indian tribe.

*Indian tribe* means any Indian tribe, band, nation, or other organized group or community, including any Alaska Native village or regional or village corporation as defined in or established pursuant to the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (43 U.S.C. Chapter 33), which is recognized as eligible for the special programs and services provided by the United States to Indians because of their status as Indians (25 U.S.C. 450b(e)). See the annually published Bureau of Indian Affairs list of Indian Entities Recognized and Eligible to Receive Services.
#### § 1600.215 Which nonprocurement transactions are not covered transactions?

In addition to the nonprocurement transactions which are not covered transactions under 2 CFR 180.215, any nonprocurement transaction entered into under a primary tier nonprocurement transaction that does not require DFC explicit prior consent is not a covered transaction under 2 CFR 180.215(g)(2).
#### § 950.40 General.

The parties shall include a provision in the Standby Support Contract that specifies the procedures in this subpart for the monitoring, auditing and disclosure of information under a Standby Support Contract.
05/18/201 1 17;55 FAX 2024935142 FAA * DMS g|001/00 2 

^..^K'SPORTATIOM 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION^T OFrRATiOMS 

Office of Hearings 

Washington,D.C. /..n m 2Q A ^^ 0 1 

j\€!^'L-f & IV 'iZ D 

BEARING r^CKE^ 

Comlux Aviation Services LLC 

FAA DOCKET NO. CP*not yet assigned* 

(ETR 20 lO'GL-11-0109) 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

Aclrainislralive Law Judge *nyl yel assigned* 

WITHDRAWAL OF COMPLAINT 

The undersigned Agency Attorney docs hereby withdraw the complaint filed in the matter 

captioned above and requests ihal the case be dismissed. The matter has been settled between the 

parties and a compromise order issued. 

Respectfully filed this 12* day of May 2011. 

Chris G. Zura( 

Senior Attorney" 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Great Lakes Region, AGL-7K 

2300 East Devon Avenue 

Des Plaines, IL 60018 

Phone: (847)294-7713 

Fax: (847)294-7498 
05/19/201 1 17:5G FAX 2024935142 FAA * DMS @l002/002 

Certificate of Service 

I hereby certify that the foregoing Withdrawal of Complaint has been mailed this 12^^ day of May 

2011, by Certified Mail, Return Receipt Requested, to: 

Original and One Copy: 

Hearing Docket, Federal Aviation Administration 

Aileniion: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilber Wright Building - Suite 2W1000 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

One Copy to: 

Mr. Jason Dickstein, Esq. 

2233 Wisconsin Avenue, NW, Suite503 

Washington, DC 20007 

Telephone: (202) 628-6776 

Fax: (202) 628-8948 

Dated this 12"'day ofMay 2011. 

rammy Gardner 

Legal Technician 

FAA Great Lakes
#### § 1800.4 Amendment.

This part will be amended by publication of changes in the Federal Register. Changes will be issued as final rules.
[J-9-2013] [OAJC: Baer, J.] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

**COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Appellee** 

**v.**

**SHATAAN ADAMS, Appellant**  **: :**  **: :**  **: :**  **: :**  **: :**  **: No. 58 MAP 2012**  **Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court entered January 20, 2012 at No.**  **2464 EDA 2009, vacating and remanding the Judgment of Sentence of the**  **Delaware County Court of Common Pleas, Criminal Division, entered July 14, 2009 at**  **No. 23 CR-0002312-2008**

**ARGUED : September 10, 2013** 

CONCURRING OPINION

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE CASTILLE DECIDED: November 20, 2014 **I concur in the result reached by the Court on the basi s of my Dissenting Opinion**  **in the companion case, Commonwealth v. Molina, __ A.3 d __ (Pa. 2014). Because this**  **case involves a pre-arrest scenario, in my view, the refer ence to appellant’s pre-arrest**  **silence during the course of the police investigation di d not impinge upon his**  **constitutional rights, irrespective of whether the prosec ution later exploited the**  **reference. In the alternative, I agree with Mr. Just ice Baer’s explanation of why the**  **reference at issue did not implicate the right to silen ce, even if such a right could be said**  **to obtain in the pre-arrest scenario.**
Editorial Note on Part 63
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 63 appear at 81 FR 86909, Dec. 2, 2016.

§ 63.71 Records and reports. ( a ) DOE shall maintain records and make reports in connection with the licensed activity that are required by the conditions of the license or by rules, regulations, and orders of the Commission, as authorized by the Atomic Energy Act and the Energy Reorganization Act.
( b ) Records of the receipt, handling, and disposition of radioactive waste at a geologic repository operations area at the Yucca Mountain site must contain sufficient information to provide a complete history of the movement of the waste from the shipper through all phases of storage and disposal. DOE shall retain these records in a manner that ensures their usability for future generations in accordance with § 63.51(a)(3).
_______________________________________ __ 

# Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

March 29, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice 129880 & (67) Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver INTERNATIONAL UNION, UNITED AUTOMOBILE, AEROSPACE & AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT WORKERS OF AMERICA and UN ITED BROADCASTING NETWORK, INC.,Plaintiffs/CounterdefendantsAppellants, Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman,
Justices

v SC: 129880 COA: 248412 Washtenaw CC: 97-008442-CB HELEN DORSEY, PAT CHOATE, and EDWARD A. MILLER, Defendants/Counterp laintiffs/ThirdParty Plaintiffs-Appellees, and

KAY CASEY, Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellee, and

DANIEL SHERRICK, R OY WYSE, and JOYCE FRANK, Third-Party Defendants-Appellants.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the motion for admittance pro hac vice is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the October 4, 2005 judgment of th e Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, for the reasons stated in the partial di ssent in the Court of Appeals, we REVERSE that part of the Court of Appeals opinion that granted a new trial, and REMA ND this case to the Court of Appeals for consideration of the issues defendants raised in their motion for new trial that the Court of Appeals did not reach . Should the Court of Appeals affirm the
circuit court’s denial of defendants’ motion for new trial, it shall reinstate mediation
sanctions.

We do not retain jurisdiction.

s0322 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

March 29, 2006

Clerk
EX-35.2
(logo) ncb

2011 Crystal Drive
Suite 800
Arlington, Virginia 22202

TEL (703) 302-8000
TOLL (800) 955-9622
FAX (703) 647-3460


February 26, 2014


Wells Fargo Bank, NA, as Certificate Administrator
Attn: Compliance Manager
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045


RE:      Annual Statement as to Compliance
         WFRBS 2013 C12

Dear Sir/Madam:


In accordance with the Pooling and Servicing Agreement entered into in
connection with the issuance of the Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through
Certificates Series 2013-C12, as an authorized officer of NCB, FSB (NCB) (the
"Co-op Special Servicer"), I hereby certify that:


a.  A review of the activities of the Co-op Special Servicer during the
    preceding calendar year and of its performance under the Pooling and
    Servicing Agreement has been made under my supervision.


b.  To the best of my knowledge, based on these reviews, the Co-op Special
    Servicer has fulfilled all obligations under this agreement in all material
    respects throughout the year.


Please note that the annual financial statement will be sent under separate
cover on or before March 31, 2014.


Best regards,

/s/ Karyn Mann

Karyn Mann
Senior Vice President, Investor Compliance
NCB, FSB



www.ncb.coop

Banking & Financial Services
Cooperative Expansion
Economic Development


The NCB Financial Group consists of the National Consumer Cooperative Bank
(NCCB) and NCB, FSB, a federally insured savings bank wholly owned by NCCB.
Banking and financial services provided by NCB, FSB.  Member FDIC.
EX-34.18
(logo) Grant Thornton

Audit * Tax * Advisory

Grant Thornton LLP
201 South College Street
Suite 2500
Charlotte, NC 28244

T 704.632.3500

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


Board of Directors

Trimont Real Estate Advisors, Inc


We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying
Management's Certification Regarding Compliance with Applicable Servicing
Criteria ("Management's Report"), that Trimont Real Estate Advisors, Inc. (the
"Company") complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB as of and for the year
ended December 31, 2013, except for those criteria noted as not applicable (N/A)
within Exhibit A. The transactions covered by this report are only those
transactions processed by the Company in its capacity as trust, senior trust or
operating advisor for the asset backed securities transactions (the "Platform").
Reference Exhibit B for the transactions covered by this examination. Management
is responsible for the Company's compliance with the applicable servicing
criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion
about the Company's compliance with the applicable servicing criteria for the
Platform based on our examination.


Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included
examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the
applicable servicing criteria for the Platform and performing such other
procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination
included testing selected asset-backed transactions and securities constituting
the Platform and evaluating whether the Company performed servicing activities
related to those transactions and securities in compliance with the applicable
servicing criteria for the period covered by this report. Accordingly, our
testing may not have included servicing activities related to each asset-backed
transaction or security constituting the Platform. Further, our examination was
not designed to detect material noncompliance that may have occurred prior to
the period covered by this report and that may have affected the Company's
servicing activities during the period covered by this report. We believe that
our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination
does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance with the
applicable servicing criteria.


1


(page)


In our opinion, management's assertion that Trimont Real Estate Advisors, Inc.
complied with the applicable servicing criteria identified in Exhibit A and
Exhibit B as of and for the year ended December 31, 2013 for the Platform is
fairly stated, in all material respects.


Charlotte, North Carolina

/s/ Grant Thornton LLP

March 1, 2014


2