SecondaryLeadCostEstimateFinalRule_.xlsx Option 1S (0.25)

SourceFile BaghouseControlEquipmentID

ControlDevic

eInstallationY

ear

InletGasFlowRat

e_dscfm

NumberO

fCompart

ments

NumberOfBags

OrCartridgesPe

rCompartment

Capital cost 

Estimate

Annualized 

Capital cost

Additional Annual 

O&M

Bag 

Replacement 

cost 

Total Annualized cost 

over current cost 

Capital cost 

Estimate by 

facility

Annualized 

Capital cost by 

Facility

Annual O&M by 

Facility

Bag Replacement 

cost by Facility

Total Annual 

O&M

Total Facility 

Annualized cost 

above current 

cost 

Current 

concentration

Current Pb 

Emissions TPY

Future Pb 

Emissions TPY

Buick RRF CD8-EP08 1967 325,000 14 416 5,625,750 531,031 156,000 349,440 1,036,471 505,440 1.19 3.46 0.462

Buick RRF CD27-EP71 2003 60,000 4 256 - 28,800 61,440 90,240 90,240 0.26 0.21 0.166

Buick RRF EP-73 27,166 3 352 470,237 44,387 13,039 63,360 120,786 76,399 1.27 0.43 0.053

Buick RRF EP-16 33,985 3 352 588,284 55,530 16,313 63,360 135,203 79,673 - 0.53 0.22 0.064

Buick RRF EP-31c 10,427 1 352 180,488 17,037 5,005 21,120 43,162 26,125 1.73 0.19 0.018

Buick RRF EP-31a 4,007 1 175 69,358 6,547 1,923 10,500 18,970 12,423 0.29 0.01 0.007

Buick RRF EP-31b 53,141 8 288 - 25,508 138,240 163,748 6,934,116 654,531 246,588 707,460 163,748 1,608,580 0.26 0.14 0.110

East Penn S202 30,000 1 384 519,300 49,018 14,400 23,040 86,458 519,300 49,018 14,400 23,040 37,440 86,458 0.34 0.05 0.021

Exide Frisco EPN 21 = SCR(BH(Feed Dryer Exhaust)) + BH(Kettles 5-7, C, D) 81,197 - 

Exide Frisco EPN 38 = SCR(BH(Reverb Exhaust) + BH(AB(Blast Exhaust62)))) ,401 - 

Exide Frisco EPN 18 = BH(Kettles 3, 4, A, B) 27,433 - 

Envirofocus SV001 = BH(AB(BF Exhaust)) 1964 35,550 10 204 - - - - - - - 0.87 0.38

Exide Baton Rouge #4 BH #3 Reverb 93-2a 1977 45,000 8 288 778,950 73,527 21,600 138,240 233,367 159,840 0.49 0.23 0.076

Exide Baton Rouge #5 BH 93-3 1979 44,000 3 352 605,850 57,188 21,120 63,360 141,668 84,480 0.51 0.34 0.106

Exide Baton Rouge #1 BH 93-1a 1979 90,000 10 528 1,557,900 147,055 43,200 316,800 507,055 2,942,700 277,770 85,920 518,400 360,000 882,090 1.26 1.49 0.188

Exide Reading C22 1984 80,000 4 264 1,384,800 130,715 38,400 63,360 232,475 101,760 0.66 0.39 0.095

Exide Reading C11 unk 60,000 5 80 1,038,600 98,036 28,800 24,000 150,836 2,423,400 228,752 67,200 87,360 52,800 383,312 0.31 0.32 0.166

Sanders BH 1 1970 90,720 10 288 1,570,363 148,231 43,546 172,800 364,577 216,346 0.62 0.72 0.184

Sanders BH #4 1970 21,200 3 288 366,972 34,640 10,176 51,840 96,656 1,937,335 182,871 53,722 224,640 62,016 461,232 0.72 0.31 0.068

Total 14,756,851 1,392,942 467,830 1,560,900 3,421,672 14,756,851 1,392,942 467,830 1,560,900 2,028,730 3,421,672 Total 8.885 1.78

Pb Emission 

Reduction 7.100

 2,028,730 

HAP Emission 

Reduction 8.999

Assumptions:

Costs calculated for baghouses that do 

not currently obtain half the limit 

evaluated of 0.5 mg/dscm

Facilities listed would need upgrade/ replacement of existing baghouses 

Baghouses selected based on actual test concentrations and concentration needed to comply with 0.5 mg/dscm limit (were over 0.25)

Survey data used for flowrate, number of compartments and number of bags if available

Cost for baghouses were derived from data submitted in survey - Model facility used 

Annualized cost assumes 7% cost of capital, 20 year life

Annual O&M cost derived from data submitted in survey. Compared with cost of replacing bags at $200/bag for teflon on teflon bag, estimated additional O&M over current is 25%

For cost over current cost of operating a baghouse, estimated that bags would be changed more often than current (2 years vs 5)

Facilities would meet the revised Lead limit for facility wide emissions
SecondaryLeadCostEstimateFinalRule_.xlsx Option 2S (0.009 lbton)

SourceFile

BaghouseControlE

quipmentID

ControlDevic

eInstallationY

ear

InletGasFlowRat

e_dscfm

NumberO

fCompart

ments

NumberOfBags

OrCartridgesPe

rCompartment

Capital cost 

Estimate

Annualized 

Capital cost

Additional Annual 

O&M

Bag 

Replacement 

cost 

Total Annualized cost 

over current cost 

Capital cost Estimate 

by facility

Annualized 

Capital cost by 

Facility

Annual O&M by 

Facility

Bag Replacement 

cost by Facility

Total Annual 

O&M

Total Facility 

Annualized cost 

above current 

cost 

Buick RRF CD8-EP08 1967 325,000 14 416 5,625,750 531,031 156,000 349,440 1,036,471

Buick RRF CD27-EP71 2003 60,000 4 256 259,650 24,509 28,800 61,440 114,749

Buick RRF EP-73 27,166 3 352 470,237 44,387 13,039 63,360 120,786

Buick RRF EP-16 33,985 3 352 588,284 55,530 16,313 63,360 135,203 6,943,920 655,457 214,152 537,600 751,752 1,407,209 

East Penn S202 30,000 1 384 - 14,400 23,040 37,440 - - 14,400 23,040 37,440 37,440 

Exide Frisco HARDLEADBH 1978 25,616 4 216 443,420 41,856 12,296 51,840 105,992

Exide Frisco SPECALLOY 1978 74,382 3 216 1,287,552 121,536 35,703 38,880 196,119

Exide Frisco SOFTLEADBH 1978 52,093 6 288 901,733 85,117 25,005 103,680 213,802

Exide Frisco NewBLAST-Reverb 1969 62,401 5 200 1,080,165 101,960 29,953 60,000 191,912

Exide Frisco FURNFUG 113,167 6 288 1,958,924 184,909 54,320 103,680 342,909

Exide Frisco RMSTG 91,883 8 288 1,590,491 150,131 44,104 138,240 332,475

Exide Frisco Dryer BH 20,000 4 216 346,200 32,679 9,600 51,840 94,119 7,608,486 718,187 210,981 548,160 759,141 1,477,328 

Exide Baton Rouge #1 BH 1973 90,000 10 528 1,557,900 147,055 43,200 316,800 507,055

Exide Baton Rouge #4 BH 1977 45,000 8 288 778,950 73,527 21,600 138,240 233,367

Exide Baton Rouge #5 BH 1979 35,000 3 352 605,850 57,188 16,800 63,360 137,348 2,942,700 277,770 81,600 518,400 600,000 877,770 

Exide Reading C22 1984 80,000 4 264 1,384,800 130,715 38,400 63,360 232,475

Exide Reading C11 60,000 5 80 1,038,600 98,036 28,800 24,000 150,836 2,423,400 228,752 67,200 87,360 154,560 383,312 

Sanders BH 1 1970 90,720 10 288 1,570,363 148,231 43,546 172,800 364,577 1,570,363 148,231 43,546 172,800 216,346 364,577 

Battery Recycling Main BH 60,000 8 240

average 1,264,051

Total 21,488,869 2,028,397 631,879 1,887,360 4,547,636 21,488,869 2,028,397 631,879 1,887,360 2,519,239 4,547,636 

 2,519,239 

Assumptions:

Note: East Penn is not currently within the limit established, however one baghouse had a test with much higher values 

than previous test. Assume East Penn needs only additional maintenance or bag replacement

Facilities would meet the revised Lead limit for facility wide emissions

For cost over current cost of operating a baghouse, estimated that bags would be changed more often than current (2 

years vs 5)

Survey data used for flowrate, number of compartments and number of bags 

Facilities listed would need upgrade/ replacement of existing baghouses 

Cost for baghouses were derived from data submitted in survey - Model facility used 

Annualized cost assumes 7% cost of capital, 20 year life

Annual O&M cost derived from data submitted in survey. Compared with cost of replacing bags at $200/bag for teflon on 

Baghouses selected based on emission rate needed to comply with lb/ton limit

Costs calculated for limit based on 0.009 lb lead emissions per ton product
SourceFile

BaghouseControlE

quipmentID

ControlDevic

eInstallationY

ear Pb Conc

Pb Emissions 

TPY

Anticipated 

Pb Emission 

Reduction

InletGasFlowRat

e_acfm

NumberO

fCompart

ments

NumberOfBags

OrCartridgesPe

rCompartment

Capital cost 

Estimate

Annualized 

Capital cost

Additional 

Annual O&M

Bag 

Replacement 

cost 

Total Annualized cost 

over current cost 

cost 

Effectiveness 

$/ton HAP

Facility Total 

Capital

Facility Total 

Annualized

Buick RRF CD8-EP08 1967 1.19 3.46 3.0 325000 14 416 5,625,750 531,031 156,000 349,440 1,036,471

Buick RRF EP-73 1.27 0.43 0.4 32599 3 352 564,284 53,264 15,647 63,360 132,272

Buick RRF EP-16 scrubber 0.53 0.22 0.1 40782 3 352 - 19,575 63,360 82,935

Buick RRF EP-31C 1.73 0.194 0.176 10427 1 352 180,488 17,037 5,005 21,120 43,162 6370521.751 1294839.911 Buick

Exide Frisco Feed Dryer 2007 0.585 0.54 0.3 97436 4 216 - 46,769 51,840 98,609 0 98609.3568 Frisco

Exide Baton Rouge #1 BH 1973 1.26 1.49 1.3 90000 10 528 1,557,900 147,055 43,200 316,800 507,055

Exide Baton Rouge EP93-3 1979 0.506 0.34 0.2 53050 3 458 - 25,464 82,419 107,883 1557900 614937.3317 Baton Rouge

Exide Reading C22 1984 0.657 0.39 0.3 80000 4 264 1,384,800 130,715 38,400 63,360 232,475 1384800 232475.3236 Reading

Sanders BH 1 1970 0.619 0.72 0.5 90720 10 288 1,570,363 148,231 43,546 172,800 364,577

Sanders BH4 1970 0.723 0.31 0.2 35000 3 352 605,850 57,188 16,800 63,360 137,348 2176213.2 501924.731 Sanders

Envirofocus SV 001 1964 0.867 0.378 35,550 10 204 - 0 0 Envirofocus

Total 8.5 6.5 11,489,435 1,084,521 410,406 1,247,859 2,742,787 334,095 11,489,435 2,742,787 

 8.20 

Total Metal HAP 

reduction Total O&M 1,658,265 

Assumptions:

0

The Battery Recycling company and Johnson controls will meet limits

Units designated for maintenance only will reduce outlet concentration by half

Option 1S- Concentration limit established at about 0.5 mg/dscm

Facilities listed would need upgrade/ replacement of existing baghouses 

Survey data used for existing baghouses at facilities. 

Cost for baghouses were derived from data submitted in survey - Model facility used 

average lead concentration from all stacks is 0.159, assumption for emission reduction is based on achieving this concentration

Annual O&M cost derived from data submitted in survey. Added to cost of replacing bags at $200/bag for teflon on teflon bag, estimated additional O&M over current is 

25%

For cost over current cost of operating a baghouse, estimated that bags would be changed more often than current (2 years vs 5)

Baghouses chosen for replacement would allow facilities to meet proposed concentration limit 

Annualized cost assumes 7% cost of capital, 20 year life
Facility BaghouseControlEquipmentID

InletGasFl

owRate_d

scfm

Number

OfComp

artment

s

NumberO

fBagsOrCa

rtridgesPe

rCompart

ment

Capital cost 

Estimate

Annualized 

Capital cost

Additional 

Annual 

O&M

Bag 

Replacemen

t cost 

Total 

Annualized 

cost over 

current cost 

Current 

concentrat

ion

Current Pb 

Emissions 

TPY

Future Pb 

Emissions 

TPY

Buick RRF CD8-EP08 325,000 14 416 5,625,750 531,031 156,000 349,440 1,036,471 1.19E+00 3.46 0.12

Buick RRF EP16 = SCR(Battery / Desulfurization / crystallization processes) 33,985 3 352 588,284 55,530 16,313 63,360 135,203 5.32E-01 0.21 0.01

Buick RRF EP31A = BH(Drum Shredder Feed Hopper) 4,007 1 175 69,358 6,547 1,923 10,500 18,970 2.87E-01 0.22 0.00

Buick RRF EP31B = BH(Drum Shredder BuildingHygiene) 53,141 8 288 919,867 86,829 25,508 138,240 250,577 2.59E-01 0.01 0.02

Buick RRF EP31C = BH (Drum Shredder) 10,427 1 352 180,488 17,037 5,005 21,120 43,162 1.73E+00 0.14 0.00

Buick RRF EP71-CD27 = BH(Reverb Slag Tap Fugitives) 60,000 4 256 1,038,600 98,036 28,800 61,440 188,276 2.58E-01 0.19 0.02

Buick RRf EP73 = Baghouse (Sweat Furnace Fugitives) 27,166 3 352 470,237 44,387 13,039 63,360 120,786 1.27E+00 0.43 0.01

Sanders BH 1 90,720 10 288 1,570,363 148,231 43,546 172,800 364,577 6.19E-01 0.72 0.03

Sanders BH #4 21,200 3 288 1,405,517 132,671 10,176 51,840 194,687 7.23E-01 0.31 0.01

Exide Frisco EPN 21 = SCR(BH(Feed Dryer Exhaust)) + BH(Kettles 5-7, C, D) 81,197 4 216 1,405,517 132,671 38,974 51,840 223,485 5.85E-01 0.54 0.03

Exide Frisco EPN 38 = SCR(BH(Reverb Exhaust) + BH(AB(Blast Exhaust)))) 62,401 5 200 1,080,165 101,960 29,953 60,000 191,912 3.25E-01 2.62E-01 0.02

Exide Frisco EPN 18 = BH(Kettles 3, 4, A, B) 27,433 4 216 474,858 44,823 13,168 51,840 109,831 2.60E-01 8.00E-02 0.01

Exide Frisco EPN 45 = Dust Collector (Raw Materials storage building fugitives) 91,883 8 288 1,590,491 150,131 44,104 138,240 332,475 1.40E-01 1.60E-01 0.03

Exide Frisco EPN 39 = BH(Slag Treatment) 21,006 1 672 363,614 34,323 10,083 40,332 84,737 4.80E-01 0.14 0.01

Exide Baton Rouge #4 BH #3 Reverb 93-2a 45,000 8 288 778,950 73,527 21,600 138,240 233,367 4.86E-01 2.33E-01 0.02

Exide Baton Rouge #5 BH 93-3 44,000 3 352 761,640 71,893 21,120 63,360 156,373 5.06E-01 3.37E-01 0.02

Exide Baton Rouge #1 BH 93-1a 90,000 10 528 1,557,900 147,055 43,200 316,800 507,055 1.26E+00 1.49E+00 0.03

Exide Reading C22 80,000 4 264 1,384,800 130,715 38,400 63,360 232,475 6.57E-01 3.93E-01 0.03

Exide Reading C11 60,000 5 80 1,038,600 98,036 28,800 24,000 150,836 3.08E-01 3.23E-01 0.02

EnviroFocus SV0011 = BH(Refining and Casting operations) 28,000 3 288 484,680 45,750 13,440 51,840 111,030 1.32E-01 5.14E-02 0.01

East Penn S202 = BH(HEPA(Rotary Scrap Dryer))) 30,000 1 384 519,300 49,018 14,400 23,040 86,458 3.40E-01 4.50E-02 0.01

Canon Hollow EP001 = BH(Refining and Receiving Kettles + Charge Hood + Mix Roo100m,000 ) + SCR(BH12(AB(Blas288 t Furn ace E1m,731iss,i000 ons))) + S163 CR(,B394H(Lead &48Sl,a000g Tap)) 207,360 418,754 1.11E-01 1.43E-01 0.04

Exide Muncie SCR-V = VS(Battery Breaker) 42,455 1 1359 734,889 69,368 20,378 81,513 171,259 2.28E-01 1.32E-01 0.02

Eagan SV001 = SCR (Hammer Mill and Reaction Tanks) 15,000 1 480 259,650 24,509 7,200 28,800 60,509 1.89E-01 2.51E-02 0.01

RSR EP1 = Scrubber(BH(Rotary Exhaust & Lead, Slag Taps)) + BH(Rotary84Dr,051 ying Kiln Ex4haust) 396 1,454,923 137,334 40,344 95,040 272,719 1.35E-01 1.22E-01 0.03

RSR EP17 = Scrubber (BH(Reverb Exhaust) + BH(Reverb Tap & Charging))55,277 6 240 956,841 90,319 26,533 86,400 203,252 1.24E-01 7.10E-02 0.02

Exide Vernon S145 = BH(CYC(Rotary Exhaust)) 18,249 1 584 315,892 29,818 8,760 35,038 73,616 2.71E-01 4.17E-02 0.01

Quemetco IN EP10 = HEPA(Busch Unit 8(SRF furnace General)) 39,098 1 196 676,781 63,883 18,767 11,760 94,410 1.40E-01 7.84E-02 0.01

TBRC Arecibo Main Stack 47,364 1 1516 819,871 77,390 22,735 90,939 191,064 1.47E-01 9.20E-02 0.02

Em Reductions

Total 30,258,825 2,856,219 810,268 2,591,842 6,258,328 10.44 0.63 Lead 9.81

Cost with HEPA filter 36,310,591 3,427,463 972,321 3,110,210 7,509,994 13.23 0.80 HAP 12.43

 4,082,531 $/Ton Reductions Lead 765,615

HAP 604,071
Facility

Total Enclosed 

Area Needed 

ft2

Building 

Capital Cost

New CF to be 

ventilated

Baghouse 

Capital ($)

Total Capital 

cost

Annualized 

Capital cost 

Baghouse + 

building

Baghouse 

Annual 

Operating 

cost($)

Enclosure 

Annual 

operating 

cost

Enclosure and 

baghouse 

operating 

cost

Enclosure and 

baghouse total 

Annual cost

Work 

practice 

estimate

Annual 

Operation and 

Maintenance 

cost (total)

Total Annual 

cost 

Exide Baton Rouge 66,488 2,659,514 1,994,636 3,031,846 5,691,360 537,224 337,093 66,488 403,581 940,805 250,000 653,581 1,190,805

Exide Forest City 29,880 1,195,185 896,389 1,362,511 2,557,696 241,428 151,490 29,880 181,369 422,798 250,000 431,369 672,798

Exide Frisco 51,281 250,000 250,000 250,000

Exide Reading 65,816 2,632,620 1,974,465 3,001,187 5,633,807 531,792 333,685 65,816 399,500 931,292 250,000 649,500 1,181,292

Doe Run 141,590 5,663,584 4,247,688 6,456,486 12,120,070 1,144,049 717,859 141,590 859,449 2,003,498 250,000 1,109,449 2,253,498

EnviroFocus 20,139 - 250,000 250,000 250,000

Sanders 111,183 4,447,336 3,335,502 5,069,963 9,517,299 898,366 563,700 111,183 674,883 1,573,249 250,000 924,883 1,823,249

Battery Recycling Co 40,658 286,664 1,084,000 1,701,680 1,988,344 187,686 183,196 40,658 223,854 411,540 250,000 473,854 661,540

Johnson Controls 400,000 608,000 608,000 57,391 67,600 - 67,600 124,991 250,000 317,600 374,991

Total listed facilities 16,884,903 21,231,672 38,116,575 6,408,172 2,250,000 5,060,237 8,658,172

Total Level 1 facilities 29,317,073 4,929,092 1,000,000 3,161,767 5,929,092

Total Level 2 facilities 8,191,503 1,354,089 750,000 1,330,869 2,104,089

Level 3 facilities 750000 750,000 750,000

Total All Facilities 38,116,575 3,597,935 2,354,623 455,614 2,810,237 6,408,172 3,000,000 5,810,237 9,408,172

East Penn 250000

Exide Muncie 250000

Exide Vernon 0

Gopher Eagan 250000

Quemetco CA 0

Quemetco In 0

RSR 0

Assumptions:

 Using the reduced footprint methodology, the capital cost of building and baghouse was reduced by up to 40%

No capital cost was estimated for Exide, Frisco because the facility is under consent to build enclosures

Level 2 definition - total facility enclosures vented to baghouse

Level 3 defnition - Level 2 plus additional work practices equivalent to South Coast California rule

No capital cost was estimated for Envirofocus as this facility is currently undergoing an expansion and upgrade. Practices described will meet control level required. 

Unenclosed or partially enclosed facilities would need to enclose area and vent to baghouse

 Unenclosed or partially enclosed faciliites would reduce their facility footprint to the size of an enclosed facility with similar production. 

 Buildings are 30 ft tall

Baghouse cost estimated from data submitted by facilities in survey. EPA cost manual data was significantly higher

Baghouse operating data was submitted in the survey for the control device used to estimate capital cost

 Baghouse operating data verified against cost to replace bags on a bi-annual basis, costs were similar

 Building O&M cost was estimated at $1 / ft sq ft. This cost was estimated using the Air Compliance Advisor program for Permanent Total Enclosures

Building cost was estimated at $40 /ft2. this cost was estimated using two model facilities in the Air Compliance Advisor for Permanent Total Enclosures. 

 The higher cost estimate of the two faciliites in $/ft2 was used to estimate all facilities 

 Not enough facility specific information on cost to retrofit was available for an alternate retrofit cost

 Cost data for a building was submitted by Quemetco, CA in January 2011. This cost was not considered in the analysis as the cost was very high compared to other estimates
Facility

Total Enclosed 

Area Needed 

ft2

Building 

Capital Cost

New CF to be 

ventilated

Baghouse 

Capital ($)

Total Capital 

cost

Annualized 

Capital cost 

Baghouse + 

building

Baghouse 

Annual 

Operating 

cost($)

Enclosure 

Annual 

operating 

cost

Enclosure and 

baghouse 

operating 

cost

Enclosure and 

baghouse total 

Annual cost

Work practice 

estimate

Annual 

Operation and 

Maintenance 

cost (total)

Ambient 

Monitoring 

Cost Total Annual cost 

Exide Baton Rouge 66,488 2,659,514 1,994,636 3,031,846 5,691,360 537,224 337,093 66,488 403,581 940,805 250,000 653,581 23,128 1,213,933

Exide Forest City 29,880 1,195,185 896,389 1,362,511 2,557,696 241,428 151,490 29,880 181,369 422,798 250,000 431,369 23,128 695,926

Exide Frisco 250,000 250,000 23,128 273,128

Exide Reading 65,816 2,632,620 1,974,465 3,001,187 5,633,807 531,792 333,685 65,816 399,500 931,292 250,000 649,500 23,128 1,204,420

Doe Run 141,590 5,663,584 4,247,688 6,456,486 12,120,070 1,144,049 717,859 141,590 859,449 2,003,498 250,000 1,109,449 23,128 2,276,626

EnviroFocus 20,139 - 250,000 250,000 23,128 273,128

Sanders 111,183 4,447,336 3,335,502 5,069,963 9,517,299 898,366 563,700 111,183 674,883 1,573,249 250,000 924,883 23,128 1,846,377

Battery Recycling Co 40,658 286,664 1,084,000 1,701,680 1,988,344 187,686 183,196 40,658 223,854 411,540 250,000 473,854 23,128 684,668

Johnson Controls 400,000 608,000 608,000 57,391 67,600 - 67,600 124,991 250,000 317,600 - 374,991

Total listed facilities 16,884,903 21,231,672 38,116,575 6,408,172 2,250,000 5,060,237 185,024 8,843,196

Total Level 1 facilities 29,317,073 4,929,092 1,000,000 3,161,767 92,512 5,336,936

Total Level 2 facilities 8,191,503 1,354,089 750,000 1,330,869 69,384 2,173,473

Level 3 facilities 750000 750,000 161,896 911,896

Total All Facilities 38,116,575 3,597,935 2,354,623 455,614 2,810,237 6,408,172 3,000,000 5,810,237 346,920 9,755,092

Assumptions:

 Using the reduced footprint methodology, the capital cost of building and baghouse was reduced by up to 40%

No capital cost was estimated for Exide, Frisco because the facility is under consent to build enclosures

Level 2 definition - total facility enclosures vented to baghouse

Level 3 defnition - Level 2 plus additional work practices equivalent to South Coast California rule

No capital cost was estimated for Envirofocus as this facility is currently undergoing an expansion and upgrade. Practices described will meet control level required. 

 Buildings are 30 ft tall

 Building O&M cost was estimated at $1 / ft sq ft. This cost was estimated using the Air Compliance Advisor program for Permanent Total Enclosures

Building cost was estimated at $40 /ft2. this cost was estimated using two model facilities in the Air Compliance Advisor for Permanent Total Enclosures. 

 The higher cost estimate of the two faciliites in $/ft2 was used to estimate all facilities 

 Not enough facility specific information on cost to retrofit was available for an alternate retrofit cost

 Cost data for a building was submitted by Quemetco, CA in January 2011. This cost was not considered in the analysis as the cost was very high compared to other estimates

Unenclosed or partially enclosed facilities would need to enclose area and vent to baghouse

 Unenclosed or partially enclosed faciliites would reduce their facility footprint to the size of an enclosed facility with similar production. 

Baghouse cost estimated from data submitted by facilities in survey. EPA cost manual data was significantly higher

Baghouse operating data was submitted in the survey for the control device used to estimate capital cost

 Baghouse operating data verified against cost to replace bags on a bi-annual basis, costs were similar
Secondary Lead Control Cost Incremental Improvement with increase in afterburner temperature

Control of THC / Dioxin-Furan

Facility

Furnace 

Type

Blast Furnace Flow 

rate requiring 

control (scfm)

Existing 

Afterburner 

Operating Temp 

(deg F) - if no 

AB, Furnace 

Temp

Existing AB 

residence time

Temp 

increase 

required 

(deg F) Fuel cost 

Current 

Emissions 

TPY TEQ

Current 

TEQ 

Emissions 

(g/yr)

TEQ 

Emission 

Reduction 

(g/yr) 10%

Cost 

Effectiveness 

$/g TEQ

Current 

Emission

s TPY 

Organic 

HAPs

Organic 

HAPs 

Emission 

Reductio

n TPY 

10%

Cost 

Effectiveness 

$/ton Organic 

HAPs

Additional 

fuel (MM 

BTU)

Additional 

NOx 

emissions 

(TPY)

Additional 

CO2 

emissions 

TPY

Doe Run Mixed 10000 500 0 0 - 2.59E-06 2.35E+00 40.40

East penn Co-located

EnviroFocus Blast

Exide Baton Rouge Reverb

Exide Baton Rouge Blast 21505 700 3 100 78,966 6.30E-06 5.72E+00 5.72E-01 $ 138,091 35.15 3.52 $ 22,464.7 19,742 0.99 1,148.98

Exide Forest City Blast 22000 1100 unk 0 - 1.67E-06 1.51548 40.63

Exide Frisco Mixed 24000 1525 1 75 66,096 4.26E-06 3.86E+00 3.86E-01 $ 171,189 26.07 2.61 $ 25,348.5 16,524 0.83 961.71

Exide Muncie Co-located

Exide Reading Co-located

Exide Vernon Mixed

Gopher Eagan Co-located

Quemetco (CA) Reverb

Quemetco (IN) Reverb

RSR Reverb

RSR Rotary- slag

Sanders Blast 16000 1300 2.5 100 58,752 1.05E-05 9.56E+00 9.56E-01 $ 61,439 117.56 11.76 $ 4,997.5 14,688 0.73 854.86

Sanders Blast 16000 1300 2.5 100 58,752 1.05E-05 9.56E+00 9.56E-01 $ 61,439 117.56 11.76 $ 4,997.5 14,688 0.73 854.86

Battery Recycling Rotary

Johnson Controls Rotary

Totals $ 262,566 3.26E+01 2.87E+00 $ 432,158 377.38 29.64 $ 8,860 65,642 3.28 3,820.41

Assumptions

A 10% reduction in D/F and organics is possible with improved operating practices and increase in afterburner temperature of 100 deg F

Beyond the floor MACT for Blast furnaces would require 1600 degree afterburner to achieve control of dioxins

$/MM BTU Nat Gas 4

Assumed the existing afterburner would remain in place. Additional afterburner fuel cost to increase temperature 100 deg F
Secondary Lead Control Cost Beyond the floor option for controlling Blast Furnaces

Control of THC / Dioxin-Furan

Facility

Furnace 

Type

Blast 

Furnace 

Flow rate 

requiring 

control 

(scfm)

Existing 

Afterburner 

Operating Temp 

(deg F) - if no 

AB, Furnace 

Temp

Existing 

AB 

residence 

time

New AB 

required 

(Y/N)

AB 

Installed 

cost

Temp 

increase 

required 

(deg F) Fuel cost 

Electricity 

(KWH)

Electricity 

$/yr

Annual Capital 

Cost O&M cost

Indirect 

Operating 

cost

Annual cost 

- total

Current 

Emission

s TPY 

TEQ

Current 

TEQ 

Emission

s (g/yr)

TEQ 

Emission 

Reductio

n (g/yr) 

90%

Cost 

Effectiveness 

$/g TEQ

Current 

Emissions 

TPY Organic 

HAPs

Organic 

HAPs 

Emission 

Reduction 

TPY 90%

Cost 

Effectiveness 

$/lb Organic 

HAPs

Additional 

fuel (MM 

BTU)

Additional 

NOx 

emissions 

(TPY)

Additional CO2 

emissions TPY

Doe Run Mixed 10000 500 0 Yes 1,040,310 1100 403,920 839,800 57,526 98,198 13,688 49,825 623,157 2.59E-06 2.35E+00 2.11E+00 $ 295,237 40.4 36.36 $ 8.6 100,980 5.05 5,877.14

East penn Co-located No

EnviroFocus Blast No

Exide Baton Rouge Reverb No

Exide Baton Rouge Blast 21505 700 3 Yes 1,259,788 900 710,697 1,805,990 123,710 118,915 13,688 58,604 1,025,614 6.30E-06 5.72E+00 5.15E+00 $ 199,280 35.2 31.64 $ 16.2 177,674 8.88 10,340.83

Exide Forest City Blast 22000 1100 unk No - - - - - 1.67E-06 1.52E+00 40.6

Exide Frisco Mixed 24000 1525 1 Yes 1,294,838 75 66,096 2,015,520 138,063 122,224 13,688 60,006 400,076 4.26E-06 3.86E+00 3.47E+00 $ 105,735 26.1 23.47 $ 8.5 16,524 0.83 961.71

Exide Muncie Co-located No

Exide Reading Co-located No

Exide Vernon Mixed No

Gopher Eagan Co-located No

Quemetco (CA) Reverb No

Quemetco (IN) Reverb No

RSR Reverb No

RSR Rotary-Slag No

Sanders Blast 16000 1300 2.5 Yes 1,170,019 300 176,256 1,343,680 92,042 110,441 13,688 55,013 447,440 1.05E-05 9.56E+00 8.61E+00 $ 47,746 58.8 52.90 $ 4.2 44,064 2.20 2,564.57

Sanders Blast 16000 1300 2.5 Yes 1,170,019 300 176,256 1,343,680 92,042 110,441 13,688 55,013 447,440 1.05E-05 9.56E+00 8.61E+00 $ 47,746 58.8 52.90 $ 4.2 44,064 2.20 2,564.57

Battery Recycling Rotary

Johnson controls Rotary

Total 5,934,974 1,533,225 503,384 560,220 68,438 278,461 2,943,728 3.59E-05 3.26E+01 2.79E+01 105,341 259.82 197 7.46 383,306 19.17 22,309

Assumptions

Beyond the floor MACT for Blast furnaces would require 1600 degree afterburner to achieve control of co-located furnaces

$/KWH 0.0685

$/MM BTU Nat Gas 4

Labor cost / hr 25

Electricity KWH calculated from equation in http://www.epa.gov/ttn/catc/dir1/cs3-2ch2.pdf

corrected for density of air at 600 deg F

Assumed the existing afterburner would remain in place. Additional afterburner fuel cost to increase temperature to 1600 deg F

Used afterburner cost data submitted in Section 114 survey for three afterburner installations to estimate base capital cost. Used highest of 3 total installed cost

 Derived new equation to account for flow rate - modeled after equation 2.32 in EPA cost estimation manual for Incinerators

Operating cost approach developed from EPA cost manual for incinerators.

 Used afterburner operating cost data submitted in Section 114 survey as a reference. Cost is similar to that calculated in this sheet. 

Cost estimated using Air Compliance Advisor (EPA cost manual program), values significantly higher than these costs. Elected to use industry supplied data as the base
Summary of WESP Control Cost by Facility

Assume furnace vent and furnace process fugitive vents to WESP

Assume flow minimized from process fugitive vents

Furnace plus 

1/2 Furnace 

Fugitives 

ACFM

Capital cost 

Estimate

Annualized Capital 

cost Operating Cost

Total Annualized 

Cost 

Alternate Operating 

Cost

Alternate Total 

Annualized cost

Electricity 

Usage kwhr/yr

Electricity 

Cost

CO2 tons per 

year from 

Electricity

NOX tons per 

year from 

electricity

Doe Run 356,641 40,746,715 3,846,202 2,037,336 5,883,537 1,783,207 5,629,408 4,707,666 310,235 3,566 7.06

East Penn 105,019 19,566,497 1,846,939 978,325 2,825,264 525,093 2,372,031 1,386,244 91,353 1,050 2.08

EnviroFocus 57,768 13,669,976 1,290,349 683,499 1,973,848 288,842 1,579,191 762,543 50,252 578 1.14

Exide Baton Rouge 165,120 25,670,457 2,423,110 1,283,523 3,706,632 825,601 3,248,710 2,179,586 143,635 1,651 3.27

Exide Forest City 95,362 18,466,254 1,743,084 923,313 2,666,396 476,810 2,219,894 1,258,778 82,953 954 1.89

Exide Frisco 152,557 24,480,086 2,310,747 1,224,004 3,534,751 762,785 3,073,532 2,013,753 132,706 1,525 3.02

Exide Muncie 125,444 21,768,255 2,054,769 1,088,413 3,143,182 627,220 2,681,989 1,655,861 109,121 1,254 2.48

Exide Reading 187,753 27,727,152 2,617,247 1,386,358 4,003,605 938,763 3,556,010 2,478,335 163,322 1,877 3.72

Exide Vernon 189,297 27,863,803 2,630,146 1,393,190 4,023,336 946,487 3,576,633 2,498,726 164,666 1,893 3.75

Gopher Eagan 215,542 30,121,205 2,843,229 1,506,060 4,349,289 1,077,708 3,920,937 2,845,150 187,495 2,155 4.27

Quemetco CA 94,556 18,000,000 1,699,073 1,000,000 2,699,073 472,780 2,171,853 1,248,139 82,252 945 1.87

Quemetco IN 82,080 16,877,030 1,593,072 843,851 2,436,924 410,400 2,003,472 1,083,456 71,400 821 1.63

RSR 129,172 22,154,120 2,091,192 1,107,706 3,198,898 645,860 2,737,052 1,705,070 112,364 1,292 2.56

Sanders 218,248 30,347,517 2,864,591 1,517,376 4,381,967 1,091,238 3,955,828 2,880,867 189,849 2,182 4.32

The Battery Recycling Co. 77,500 16,305,519 1,539,126 815,276 2,354,402 387,500 1,926,626 1,023,000 67,416 775 1.53

Johnson Controls 202,420 29,007,149 2,738,070 1,450,357 4,188,427 1,012,098 3,750,167 2,671,938 176,081 2,024 4.01

Total 2,359,922 382,771,737 36,130,944 19,238,587 55,369,531 12,272,391 48,403,335 31,150,972 2,052,849 23,597 46.73

Additional Total Cost 364,771,737 34,431,871 18,238,587 52,670,458 11,799,611 46,231,482 29,902,833 1,970,597 22,651 45

Method Used EPA Method

Capital 364,771,737 285,784,915

Annual 18,238,587 11,799,611

TAC 52,670,458 38,775,685

MM $/ ton 2.70 1.99

MM $/ton 

selected option 0.33
Cost

Annual cost 

per monitor

Number of 

monitors / 

site

Total 

Annual cost

Total cost15 facilities

Ambient Lead Monitoring (lab analysis) per test 127 7725.8 2 15452 231,775

Ambient Monitoring Equipment Annual Lease 2500 2500 2 5000 75,000

Labor to collect and ship samples, analyze data 22 1338.3 2 2677 40,150

Total monitoring cost 23,128 346,925

Ambient monitors tested once every 6 days

References: 

Table 3.5 - Additional Testing and Monitoring Costs, Primary Lead Smelting Technical Support document
Annualized Cost to Small Businesses

Gopher Resources Envirofocus Battery Recycling

Additional Work Practices 250,000 250,000 250,000

Testing, Monitoring, Recordkee ping 46,448 46,448 33,865

Ambient Lead Monitoring 21,000 21,000 21,000

Stack controls - - -

Total Enclosures - - 411,540

Facility Total 317,448 317,448 716,405

Company Total $ 634,896 $ 716,405
Secondary Lead - REVISED Pre Control Fugitive Emissions Estimates

Estimates based upon Facility C detailed fugitive estimates and comparison of facility descriptions

Basis: size 

factor and 

housekeeping 

factor

2006 Fugitive 

Estimates

Facility Code Size Factor Enclosure Factor

Enclosure 

Category 

Housekeeping factor 

(based on practices 

plus ambient 

monitoring values)

Fugitive Pb 

Emissions 

Tons/yr 

Fugitive Pb 

Emissions 

Tons/yr 

Exide Baton Rouge 0.84 1.07 Unenclosed 1 0.64 0.7

Exide Forest City 0.76 0.75 Partial 1 0.40 1.9

Exide Frisco 1.03 1.00 Partial- Model 1 0.73 2.2

Exide Muncie 1.04 0.25 Enclosed 1 0.18 1.2

Exide Reading 1.00 0.75 Partial 1 0.53 1

Exide Vernon 1.84 0.25 Enclosed 0.5 0.16 1.2

RSR NY 1.36 0.25 Enclosed 0.25 0.06 1.4

Quemetco CA 1.19 0.25 Enclosed 0.2 0.04 1.5

Quemetco IN 1.27 0.25 Enclosed 0.25 0.06 0.5

Sanders, Al 1.40 1.07 Unenclosed 1 1.07 1.2

Envirofocus 0.44 0.75 Partial 1 0.24 1

Gopher, Eagan Mn 1.56 0.25 Enclosed 1 0.28 1.3

Doe Run, Boss Mo 3.14 1.07 Unenclosed 1 2.39 7.3

East Penn 1.34 0.25 Enclosed 0.25 0.06 1.7

Arecibo, Puerto Rico 0.32 1.07 Unenclosed 1 0.24

Johnson controls 1.44 Enclosed

7.08 24.1

Total HAP 8.18

0.51 1.72
Fugitive Emissions - Other Metals. Basis Average of Production and Area factors

Fugitive Pb 

Emissions 

lb/yr As Tons/yr Be Tons/yr Cd Tons/yr Cr Tons/yr Cr+6 Tons/yr Cr+3 Tons/yr Mn Tons/yr Hg Tons/yr

Elemental 

Gaseous Mercury

Gaseous 

Divalent 

Mercury Particulate DivalNi entTMonersc/ury yr Se Tons/yr Sb Tons/yr

1277 1.62E-02 1.11E-04 1.18E-02 2.40E-03 2.40E-05 2.37E-03 1.09E-02 5.34E-03 4.27E-03 5.34E-04 7.01E-04 4.51E-03 8.75E-03 2.04E-02

807 1.03E-02 7.00E-05 7.49E-03 1.52E-03 1.52E-05 1.50E-03 6.89E-03 3.38E-03 2.70E-03 3.38E-04 6.33E-04 2.85E-03 2.38E-02 1.29E-02

1460 1.85E-02 1.27E-04 1.36E-02 2.74E-03 2.74E-05 2.71E-03 1.25E-02 6.11E-03 4.89E-03 6.11E-04 8.60E-04 5.16E-03 2.75E-02 2.34E-02

370 4.70E-03 3.21E-05 3.43E-03 6.94E-04 6.94E-06 6.87E-04 3.16E-03 1.55E-03 1.24E-03 1.55E-04 4.35E-04 1.31E-03 1.50E-02 5.92E-03

1070 1.36E-02 9.27E-05 9.93E-03 2.01E-03 2.01E-05 1.99E-03 9.13E-03 4.48E-03 3.58E-03 4.48E-04 4.19E-04 3.78E-03 1.25E-02 1.71E-02

327 4.15E-03 2.84E-05 3.04E-03 6.14E-04 6.14E-06 6.08E-04 2.79E-03 1.37E-03 1.09E-03 1.37E-04 7.69E-04 1.16E-03 1.50E-02 5.23E-03

121 1.54E-03 1.05E-05 1.12E-03 2.27E-04 2.27E-06 2.25E-04 1.03E-03 5.07E-04 4.06E-04 5.07E-05 5.70E-04 4.28E-04 1.75E-02 1.94E-03

84 1.07E-03 7.32E-06 7.84E-04 1.59E-04 1.59E-06 1.57E-04 7.21E-04 3.54E-04 2.83E-04 3.54E-05 4.97E-04 2.99E-04 1.88E-02 1.35E-03

113 1.44E-03 9.81E-06 1.05E-03 2.12E-04 2.12E-06 2.10E-04 9.65E-04 4.73E-04 3.79E-04 4.73E-05 5.32E-04 4.00E-04 6.25E-03 1.81E-03

2133 2.71E-02 1.85E-04 1.98E-02 4.01E-03 4.01E-05 3.97E-03 1.82E-02 8.93E-03 7.14E-03 8.93E-04 1.17E-03 7.54E-03 1.50E-02 3.41E-02

472 5.99E-03 4.09E-05 4.38E-03 8.86E-04 8.86E-06 8.77E-04 4.02E-03 1.97E-03 1.58E-03 1.97E-04 3.70E-04 1.67E-03 1.25E-02 7.55E-03

553 7.02E-03 4.79E-05 5.13E-03 1.04E-03 1.04E-05 1.03E-03 4.72E-03 2.31E-03 1.85E-03 2.31E-04 6.50E-04 1.95E-03 1.63E-02 8.84E-03

4773 6.06E-02 4.14E-04 4.43E-02 8.96E-03 8.96E-05 8.87E-03 4.07E-02 2.00E-02 1.60E-02 2.00E-03 2.62E-03 1.69E-02 9.13E-02 7.64E-02

119 1.51E-03 1.03E-05 1.10E-03 2.23E-04 2.23E-06 2.21E-04 1.02E-03 4.98E-04 3.98E-04 4.98E-05 5.60E-04 4.20E-04 2.13E-02 1.90E-03

488 6.20E-03 4.23E-05 4.53E-03 9.17E-04 9.17E-06 9.08E-04 4.17E-03 2.04E-03 1.64E-03 2.04E-04 1.73E-03 0.00E+00 7.81E-03

0.180 0.001 0.132 0.027 0.000 0.121 0.059 0.050 0.301 0.227
Updates Include:

Used reduced Exide Frisco Emissions estimates - eliminated double counting of blast and reverb furnace fugitives

Estimated fugitive reduction for the enclosure of raw material storage area based on information submitted by Frisco. (Previous estimates prior to enclosure)

Assigned emissions to unenclosed facilities based on a ratio higher than the Exide Frisco, but similar to their emissions prior to enclosure of Raw material area (1.07 factor)

Revised East Penn fugitive emissions based on information provided in the comments, using a work practice factor of 0.25 (equivalent to best of industry, but not to level of Quemetco CA)

Included Arecibo facility using factors similar to other facilities. Because their facility is small and has low production, fugitives were moderate. 

FE Reductions Anticipated

TPY lb/yr

Pb 6.42 12848

As 0.163 326

Be 0.001 2

Cd 0.119 239

Cr 0.024 48

Cr+6 0.00024 0

Cr+3 0.000 0

Mn 0.110 219

Hg 0.054 108

Ni 0.045 91

Se 0.000 0

Sb 0.206 411

total HAP 7.15 14292
Secondary Lead - REVISED Post Control Fugitive Emissions Estimates

Basis: size 

factor and 

housekeepi

ng factor

2006 Fugitive 

Estimates Fugitive Emissions - Other Metals. Basis Average of Production and Area factors

Facility Code Size Factor Enclosure Factor

Enclosure 

Category 

Housekeeping 

factor (based on 

practices plus 

ambient monitoring 

values)

Fugitive Pb 

Emissions 

Tons/yr 

2006 estimates 

Fugitive Pb 

Emissions 

Tons/yr 

Fugitive Pb 

Emissions 

lb/yr As Tons/yr Be Tons/yr Cd Tons/yr Cr Tons/yr Cr+6 Tons/yr Cr+3 Tons/yr Mn Tons/yr Hg Tons/yr

Elemental 

Gaseous 

Mercury

Gaseous 

Divalent 

Mercury Particulate DivaNi lentTMonesrc/yrury Se Tons/yr Sb Tons/yr

Exide Baton Rouge 0.84 0.25 Unenclosed 0.2 0.03 0.7 60 7.57E-04 5.17E-06 5.53E-04 1.12E-04 1.12E-06 1.11E-04 5.09E-04 2.49E-04 2.00E-04 2.49E-05 7.01E-04 2.11E-04 8.75E-03 9.54E-04

Exide Forest City 0.76 0.25 Partial 0.2 0.03 1.9 54 6.83E-04 4.66E-06 4.99E-04 1.01E-04 1.01E-06 1.00E-04 4.59E-04 2.25E-04 1.80E-04 2.25E-05 6.33E-04 1.90E-04 2.38E-02 8.61E-04

Exide Frisco 1.03 0.25 Partial- Model 0.2 0.04 2.2 73 9.29E-04 6.34E-06 6.79E-04 1.37E-04 1.37E-06 1.36E-04 6.24E-04 3.06E-04 2.45E-04 3.06E-05 8.60E-04 2.58E-04 2.75E-02 1.17E-03

Exide Muncie 1.04 0.25 Enclosed 0.2 0.04 1.2 74 9.39E-04 6.41E-06 6.87E-04 1.39E-04 1.39E-06 1.37E-04 6.31E-04 3.10E-04 2.48E-04 3.10E-05 4.35E-04 2.61E-04 1.50E-02 1.18E-03

Exide Reading 1.00 0.25 Partial 0.2 0.04 1 71 9.06E-04 6.18E-06 6.62E-04 1.34E-04 1.34E-06 1.33E-04 6.08E-04 2.98E-04 2.39E-04 2.98E-05 4.19E-04 2.52E-04 1.25E-02 1.14E-03

Exide Vernon 1.84 0.25 Enclosed 0.2 0.07 1.2 131 1.66E-03 1.13E-05 1.21E-03 2.46E-04 2.46E-06 2.43E-04 1.12E-03 5.47E-04 4.38E-04 5.47E-05 7.69E-04 4.62E-04 1.50E-02 2.09E-03

RSR NY 1.36 0.25 Enclosed 0.2 0.05 1.4 97 1.23E-03 8.40E-06 8.99E-04 1.82E-04 1.82E-06 1.80E-04 8.27E-04 4.06E-04 3.24E-04 4.06E-05 5.70E-04 3.42E-04 1.75E-02 1.55E-03

Quemetco CA 1.19 0.25 Enclosed 0.2 0.04 1.5 84 1.07E-03 7.32E-06 7.84E-04 1.59E-04 1.59E-06 1.57E-04 7.21E-04 3.54E-04 2.83E-04 3.54E-05 4.97E-04 2.99E-04 1.88E-02 1.35E-03

Quemetco IN 1.27 0.25 Enclosed 0.2 0.05 0.5 91 1.15E-03 7.85E-06 8.40E-04 1.70E-04 1.70E-06 1.68E-04 7.72E-04 3.79E-04 3.03E-04 3.79E-05 5.32E-04 3.20E-04 6.25E-03 1.45E-03

Sanders, Al 1.40 0.25 Unenclosed 0.2 0.05 1.2 100 1.26E-03 8.63E-06 9.24E-04 1.87E-04 1.87E-06 1.85E-04 8.50E-04 4.17E-04 3.33E-04 4.17E-05 1.17E-03 3.52E-04 1.50E-02 1.59E-03

Envirofocus 0.44 0.25 Partial 0.2 0.02 1 31 3.99E-04 2.73E-06 2.92E-04 5.90E-05 5.90E-07 5.84E-05 2.68E-04 1.32E-04 1.05E-04 1.32E-05 3.70E-04 1.11E-04 1.25E-02 5.03E-04

Gopher, Eagan Mn 1.56 0.25 Enclosed 0.2 0.06 1.3 111 1.40E-03 9.58E-06 1.03E-03 2.08E-04 2.08E-06 2.05E-04 9.43E-04 4.63E-04 3.70E-04 4.63E-05 6.50E-04 3.90E-04 1.63E-02 1.77E-03

Doe Run, Boss Mo 3.14 0.25 Unenclosed 0.2 0.11 7.3 223 2.83E-03 1.93E-05 2.07E-03 4.18E-04 4.18E-06 4.14E-04 1.90E-03 9.33E-04 7.46E-04 9.33E-05 2.62E-03 7.87E-04 9.13E-02 3.57E-03

East Penn 1.34 0.25 Enclosed 0.2 0.05 1.7 95 1.21E-03 8.25E-06 8.83E-04 1.79E-04 1.79E-06 1.77E-04 8.12E-04 3.98E-04 3.19E-04 3.98E-05 5.60E-04 3.36E-04 2.13E-02 1.52E-03

Arecibo, Puerto Rico 0.35 0.25 Unenclosed 0.2 0.01 25 3.15E-04 2.15E-06 2.30E-04 4.66E-05 4.66E-07 4.61E-05 2.12E-04 1.04E-04 8.30E-05 1.04E-05 8.76E-05 0.00E+00 3.97E-04

Johnson controls 1.44 Enclosed

0.66 24.1 0.017 0.000 0.012 0.002 0.000 0.011 0.006 0.005 0.301 0.021

Total HAP 1.03

Updates Include:

Used reduced Exide Frisco Emissions estimates - eliminated double counting of blast and reverb furnace fugitives

Estimated fugitive reduction for the enclosure of raw material storage area based on information submitted by Frisco. (Previous estimates prior to enclosure)

Assigned emissions to unenclosed facilities based on a ratio higher than the Exide Frisco, but similar to their emissions prior to enclosure of Raw material area (1.07 factor)

Revised East Penn fugitive emissions based on information provided in the comments, using a work practice factor of 0.25 (equivalent to best of industry, but not to level of Quemetco CA)

Included Arecibo facility using factors similar to other facilities. Because their facility is small and has low production, fugitives were moderate.