### 42492 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 139 / Thursday, July 19, 2012 / Notices

may serve more than 2 consecutive terms as a director.

Dated: June 28, 2012. Lisa P. Jackson,
Administrator.
Wonya Lucas

Ms. Wonya Y. Lucas has been Chief Executive Officer and President of TV One, LLC since August 08, 2011. Ms. Lucas was most recently Executive Vice President of Discovery Channel, Chief Operating Officer of Discovery Channel, Executive Vice President of Science Channel and Chief Operating Officer of Science Channel at Discovery Communications Holding, LLC since June 2010. She served as Chief Marketing Officer of Discovery Communications Holding, LLC from March 24, 2008 to June 2010.

Prior to joining Discovery Communications in 2008, Lucas served as General Manager and Executive Vice President of The Weather Channel Networks, where she was responsible for corporate strategy and development, strategic marketing for The Weather Channel and weather.com, and operations and programming for The Weather Channel, The Weather Channel HD, Weatherscan, The Weather Channel Radio Network, and newspaper syndication.

Before joining The Weather Channel in 2002 as Executive Vice President of Marketing, Lucas held several positions at Turner Broadcasting System, including Senior Vice President of Strategic Marketing for CNN Networks and Vice President of Business Operations and Network Development for TBS, TNT, Turner Classic Movies and Turner South. Her other experience includes brand management for The Coca-Cola Company and The Clorox Company.

In 2010, Lucas was named among the ‘‘75 Most Powerful Women in Business’’ by Black Enterprise magazine. Previous honors include listing among the 2009 ‘‘Leading Women in Business’’ and ‘‘Leading Minorities in Business’’ by Cablefax Daily, recognition as a ‘‘Woman To Watch’’ by Women in Cable Telecommunications, a Brand Builders Award at the 2006 Promax & BDA Conference, recognition as a ‘‘Women To Watch’’ in the 2005 Wonder Women of Cable TV Awards, and the Inspiration Award for ‘‘Woman of the Year’’ in the WICT–Atlanta’s 2007 Red Letter Awards. Lucas serves on the Board of Directors of the Cable & Telecommunications Association forMarketing and she was the cochairperson for the 2007 CTAM Summit. She also has served as a board member for WICT, Inc. and is a graduate of the Betsy Magness Leadership Institute.

Ms. Lucas earned a master’s degree in business administration from the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School of Business and a bachelor’s degree in Industrial Engineering from Georgia Institute of Technology.

[FR Doc. 2012–17661 Filed 7–18–12; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 6560–50–P**

**ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY** 

**[Petition IV–2010–9; FRL–9700–9]**

**Clean Air Act Operating Permit Program; Petition for Objection to**  **State Operating Permit for Kentucky Syngas, LLC; Muhlenberg County, KY** 

**AGENCY :**  Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

**ACTION :**  Notice of final order on petition to object to a state operating permit.

**SUMMARY :**  Pursuant to Clean Air Act (CAA) the EPA Administrator signed an Order, dated June 22, 2012, partially granting and partially denying a petition to object to a CAA merged prevention of significant deterioration and title V operating permit issued by the Kentucky Division for Air Quality (KDAQ) to Kentucky Syngas, LLC (KSG) for its facility located near Central City in Muhlenberg County, Kentucky. This Order constitutes a final action on the petition submitted by Environmental Policy & Law Center on behalf of Sierra Club and Valley Watch (Petitioners) and received by EPA on October 27, 2010. A petition for judicial review of those parts of the Order that deny issues in the petition may be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit within 60 days from the date this notice is published in the Federal Register

. **DATES :**  September 17, 2012.

**ADDRESSES :**  Copies of the Order, the petition, and all pertinent information relating thereto are on file at the following location: EPA Region 4; Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management Division; 61 Forsyth Street SW.; Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. The Order is also available electronically at the following address: http://www.epa.gov/region07/ air/title5/petitiondb/petitions/ kentuckysyngas

_ response2010.pdf.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Art Hofmeister, Air Permits Section, EPA Region 4, at (404) 562–9115 or hofmeister.art@epa.gov.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  The CAA affords EPA a 45-day period to review and, as appropriate, the authority to object to operating permits proposed by state permitting authorities under title V of the CAA, 42 U.S.C. 7661–7661f. Section 505(b)(2) of the CAA and 40 CFR 70.8(d) authorize any person to petition the EPA Administrator to object to a title V operating permit within 60 days after the expiration of EPA’s 45- day review period if EPA has not objected on its own initiative. Petitions must be based only on objections to the permit that were raised with reasonable specificity during the public comment period provided by the state, unless the petitioner demonstrates that it was impracticable to raise these issues during the comment period or the grounds for the issues arose after this period.

Petitioners submitted a petition regarding KSG (received by EPA on October 27, 2010), requesting that EPA object to the CAA title V operating permit (#V–09–001). Petitioners alleged that the permit was not consistent with the CAA because: (1) KDAQ failed to provide an opportunity for meaningful public participation; (2) KDAQ failed to consider and respond to comments on alternatives; (3) KDAQ’s decision to permit the KSG facility and the Thoroughbred Mine separately was arbitrary and capricious; (4) the best available control technology (BACT) analyses omitted consideration of clean fuels and processes; (5) emissions estimates from the flare and BACT for the flare were in error; (6) the permit failed to meet certain requirements for hazardous air pollutants; (7) KDAQ failed to accurately account for all emissions of volatile organic compounds in the potential-to-emit calculation; (8) the permit’s monitoring requirements for a variety of different units and pollutants were inadequate; (9) KSG failed to accurately estimate, sufficiently control and adequately model particulate matter; (10) KDAQ failed to demonstrate that the proposed facility will not cause or contribute to violations of the ozone national ambient air quality standard; and (11) the permit lacked the necessary PM 2.5 limit.

On June 22, 2012, the Administrator issued an Order partially granting and partially denying the petition. The Order explains EPA’s rationale for partially granting and partially denying the petition.

Dated: July 6, 2012. A. Stanley Meiburg, Deputy Regional Administrator. Region 4.

[FR Doc. 2012–17632 Filed 7–18–12; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 6560–50–P**