alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION OF PRESIDENT PURSUANT TO SECURITIES
ACT RULES 13A-14 AND 15D-14 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Del Taco Income Properties IV;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
 Date: May 14, 2007
    /s/ Shirlene LopezShirlene LopezPresident
#### § 1401.335 Whom in the DOI does a recipient other than an individual notify about a criminal drug conviction?

The DOI is not designating a central location for the receipt of these reports. Therefore you shall provide this report to every grant officer, or other designee within a bureau or office of the Department on whose grant activity the convicted employee was working.
# Subpart 1450.1 - Extraordinary Contractual Actions

**Parent topic:**PART 1450 - EXTRAORDINARY CONTRACTUAL ACTIONS AND THE SAFETY ACT

## 1450.101 General.

## 1450.101-2 Policy.

Requests for extraordinary contractual actions shall be submitted by the HCA to the Director, PAM, for further action.   

## 1450.101-3 Records.

The records of actions taken under FAR Part 50 shall be maintained by the Director, PAM.   

## 1450.102 Delegation of and limitations on exercise of authority.

## 1450.102-1 Delegation of authority.

The AS/PMB shall approve all actions under FAR Part 50, except for actions in excess of $55,000, actions which increase the contract price without consideration, and indemnification actions, which shall be approved by the Secretary.   

## 1450.103 Contract adjustments.

## 1450.103-6 Disposition.

The CO shall submit the Memorandum of Decision including the contractor's request, contractor information in support of the request required by FAR 50.103-4, the results of the CO's investigation required by FAR 50.103-5, and the information required by FAR 50.103-6 to the SOL for review. If the SOL concurs with the Memorandum of Decision, the Memorandum of Decision will be submitted through the HCA to the Director, PAM, for further action.   

## 1450.104 Residual powers.

## 1450.104-2 General.

Proposals for the exercise of residual powers shall be processed using the procedures referred to in FAR 50.104-2.   

## 1450.104-3 Special procedures for unusually hazardous or nuclear risks.

The CO shall submit the proposed Memorandum of Decision including the contractor's request for indemnification and the information required from the CO, to the SOL for review and approval. If the SOL approves the proposed Memorandum of Decision, it shall be submitted through the HCA, to the Director, PAM, for approval or disapproval by the Secretary.
H. Res. 715

In the House of Representatives, U.S., 

March 9, 2006.

Resolved, That the following named Member be, and is 

hereby, elected to the following standing committee of the 

House of Representatives: 

COMMITTEE ON AGRICULTURE: MR. SODREL. 

Attest:

Clerk.
Exhibit 35.3A



|     |  |                                     
|---- |  | ------------------------------------
|LOGO |  | 1 Corelogic Drive
Westlake, TX 76262

SERVICER COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION

This Servicer Compliance Certification is issued pursuant to the Tax Outsourcing Agreement dated as of May 28, 2009 (together with all amendments thereto, the
Agreement), between Cenlar FSB (Bank) and CoreLogic Tax Services, LLC (CoreLogic).

I, Vicki Chenault, an authorized
officer of CoreLogic, certify to Bank and with the knowledge and intent that it will rely upon this certification, that:

1. The servicing
information required to be provided to Bank by CoreLogic under the Agreement has been so provided;

2. I am responsible for reviewing the
activities performed by CoreLogic under the Agreement and, based upon my knowledge and in all material respects throughout the relevant reporting period, CoreLogic has fulfilled its obligations under the Agreement.

3. Attached to this Servicer Compliance Certification is a list of all material failures and the nature and status thereof. [NONE/NO
ATTACHMENT]



|                            |  |                      
|--------------------------- |  | ---------------------
|CORELOGIC TAX SERVICES, LLC
|                            | 
|By:                         |  | /s/ Vicki Chenault   
|                            |  | Vicki Chenault       
|                            |  | Senior Vice President
|                            | 
|                            |  | February 11, 2016
MEMORANDUM 

DATE: 10/2/2014

TO: Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket Id: OAR–2013-0602

FROM: Mike Gordon, EPA Region 3

SUBJECT: 9/25/14 Meeting with Newport News Citizens sponsored by the American Lung 

Association

SUMMARY

A meeting was held between the EPA and the general public in Newport News, Virginia

on September 25, 2014 to discuss the proposed Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants. The 

Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants was proposed on June 2, 2014.

ATTENDEES

Mike Gordon, EPA Region 3*

Emily Linn, EPA Region 3*

Tiana Blount, EPA Region 3

Holly Wilson, OAQPS*

Dr. Erica Holloman, American Lung Association

Members of the public

*Called in via conference line
§ 200.103 Authorities. This part is issued under the following authorities. ( a ) Subparts B through D of this part are authorized under 31 U.S.C. 503 (the Chief Financial Officers Act, Functions of the Deputy Director for Management), 41 U.S.C. 1101-1131 (the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act), Reorganization Plan No. 2 of 1970, and Executive Order 11541 (“Prescribing the Duties of the Office of Management and Budget and the Domestic Policy Council in the Executive Office of the President”), the Single Audit Act Amendments of 1996, (31 U.S.C. 7501-7507), as well as The Federal Program Information Act (Pub. L. 95-220 and Pub. L. 98-169, as amended, codified at 31 U.S.C. 6101-6106).
( b ) Subpart E of this part is authorized under the Budget and Accounting Act of 1921, as amended; the Budget and Accounting Procedures Act of 1950, as amended (31 U.S.C. 1101-1125); the Chief Financial Officers Act of 1990 (31 U.S.C. 503-504); Reorganization Plan No. 2 of 1970; and Executive Order 11541, “Prescribing the Duties of the Office of Management and Budget and the Domestic Policy Council in the Executive Office of the President.”
( c ) Subpart F of this part is authorized under the Single Audit Act Amendments of 1996, (31 U.S.C. 7501-7507).
[85 FR 49538, Aug. 13, 2020]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial data extracted from the Registrant's
unaudited consolidated financial statements as of and for the quarter ended
October 31, 1998, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
financial statements and the notes thereto.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
       
<S>                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JAN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   OCT-31-1998
<CASH>                                                 889
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                          769
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                         16,094
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    18,862
<PP&E>                                              28,413
<DEPRECIATION>                                      22,453
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      24,822
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               21,301
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                3,814
<PREFERRED>                                          2,072
<COMMON>                                            16,224
<OTHER-SE>                                        (20,740)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        24,822
<SALES>                                             16,145
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    16,145
<CGS>                                               11,867
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       16,259
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     421
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      (535)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  (535)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                         (535)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       (1.22)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of SITI-Sites.com, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), We,
Lawrence M. Powers, Chief Executive Officer and Toni Ann Tantillo, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


                                                /s/ Lawrence M. Powers
                                                -----------------------
                                                Lawrence M. Powers
                                                Chief Executive Officer


                                                /s/ Toni Ann Tantillo
                                                -----------------------
                                                Toni Ann Tantillo
                                                Chief Financial Officer


August 13, 2003
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 56 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                      February 2, 2005.
Whereas on January 9, 2005, the Palestinian people elected Mahmoud Abbas as the 
        second President of the Palestinian Authority;
Whereas this election has been hailed as free and fair and is an important and 
        noteworthy step in advancing democracy in the Arab world;
Whereas Israel should be commended for facilitating the Palestinian election 
        proceedings;
Whereas the United States is hopeful that a peaceful resolution of the Israeli-
        Palestinian conflict can be achieved;
Whereas the United States is strongly committed to the security of Israel and 
        its well-being as a Jewish state; and
Whereas on June 24, 2002, President George W. Bush expressed his vision of two 
        states living side by side in peace and security and that vision can 
        only be fully realized when terrorism is defeated, so that a new state 
        may be created based on the rule of law and respect for human rights: 
        Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved,  That the House of Representatives--
            (1) commends the Palestinian people for conducting a free and fair 
        presidential election on January 9, 2005;
            (2) congratulates the new Palestinian President, Mahmoud Abbas;
            (3) urges the new Palestinian leadership to continue to advance 
        democratic ideals by reforming the Palestinian political structure, 
        advancing human rights, and ending corruption;
            (4) strongly condemns terrorism and urges President Mahmoud Abbas, 
        who has previously disavowed terrorism, to immediately take steps to 
        dismantle the Palestinian terrorist infrastructure, confiscate 
        unauthorized weapons, arrest and bring terrorists to justice, 
        consolidate and control the many Palestinian security organizations, and 
        end the incitement to violence and hatred in the Palestinian media, 
        educational institutions, mosques, and other institutions;
            (5) urges Arab states to take active steps to encourage and assist 
        the Palestinian Authority in bringing an end to terrorism and an end to 
        anti-Israel incitement in their own media; and
            (6) encourages all interested parties to take advantage of this 
        historic opportunity to remove obstacles to achieving a lasting peace in 
        the Middle East.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Peter B. Scanlon, Appellant, *v.*Charles F. Milliken, et al., Composing the State Civil Service Commission, Respondents.

*People ex rel. Scanlon*v. Milliken, 127 App. Div. 468, reversed. .

(Argued November 11, 1908;

decided December 15, 1908.)

Appeal from an order of'the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered J uly 7, 1908, which affirmed an order of Special Term denying an application for a peremptory writ of mandamus to compel the defendants to place the relator’s name upon the roster of employees in the office of the sheriff of Kings county.

*John J. McGinniss*for appellant.

*William 8.*Jackson, *Attorney-General [Timothy I. Dillon*of counsel), for respondents.

Orders of Appellate Division and Special Term reversed, and application for mandamus granted, with costs in all courts, on the authority of *Matter of Flaherty*v. *Milliken*(193 N. Y. 564); no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Haight, Vann, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock and Chase, JJ.
`[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 653 Reported in House (RH)]







                                                 House Calendar No. 142
109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 653

                          [Report No. 109-366]

    Relating to consideration of the bill (S. 1932) to provide for 
reconciliation pursuant to section 202(a) of the concurrent resolution 
         on the budget for fiscal year 2006 (H. Con. Res. 95).


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 31, 2006

    Mr. Putnam, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION


 
    Relating to consideration of the bill (S. 1932) to provide for 
reconciliation pursuant to section 202(a) of the concurrent resolution 
         on the budget for fiscal year 2006 (H. Con. Res. 95).

    Resolved, That the House hereby concurs in the Senate amendment to 
the House amendment to the bill (S. 1932) to provide for reconciliation 
pursuant to section 202(a) of the concurrent resolution on the budget 
for fiscal year 2006 (H. Con. Res. 95).
                                                 House Calendar No. 142

109th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                              H. RES. 653

                          [Report No. 109-366]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

    Relating to consideration of the bill (S. 1932) to provide for 
reconciliation pursuant to section 202(a) of the concurrent resolution 
         on the budget for fiscal year 2006 (H. Con. Res. 95).

_______________________________________________________________________

                            January 31, 2006

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed`
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the annual report of SBH ASSOCIATES, INC. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2015 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Brent A. Beecham, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify that:  1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date: January 13, 2016 By: /s/BRENT A. BEECHAM Brent A. Beecham Chief Financial Officer
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Josephus M. Bostic, Appellant.

Cooke, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Albany County, rendered July 15, 1968, convicting defendant on his plea of guilty of burglary in the third degree. While investigating an apparent burglary at a jewelry store in the City of Albany detective Keefe came upon defendant and noticed a cloth bag near where the latter was standing. Upon inquiry, defendant admitted that all the goods he had taken were in the bag. Indicted for burglary in the third degree and grand larceny in the second degree, appellant, represented by the Public Defender’s staff, pleaded not guilty on April 15, 1968. About a month thereafter defendant’s counsel, in his presence, indicated they would he ready for trial three days later. Prior to the suppression hearing on July 10, 1968, defendant stated that he had not had sufficient time to consult with counsel and the request was made .that the trial be put over until October. However, counsel informed the court he was ready to proceed. Appellant had the right to a reasonable time to prepare for trial with counsel’s assistance, but this constitutional guarantee could not be invoked merely to delay the course of justice *(People*v. *Brdbson,*9 N Y 2d 173, 179; *People*v. *Mooney,*18 A D 2d 1112, cert. den. 375 U. S'. 887). His argument of denial of the right to counsel overlooks the facts that he was given additional time to consult with counsel prior to the suppression hearing and that his plea of guilty, with the understanding that the larceny charge be dismissed, was not entered until the day following the hearing after “ thorough ” discussion with counsel. There was no error in denying the motion to suppress the real evidence, since it is well recognized that objects falling in the plain view of an officer who has a right to be in the position to have that view are subject to seizure and may be introduced in evidence *(Harris*V. *United States,*390 U. S. 234, 236; *People*v. *Gallmon,*19 N Y 2d 389, 394; *People*v. *Merola,*30 A D 2d 963) and the detective was lawfully on the premises, having been admitted by the store manager. Regarding the claim that his guilty plea was not a fully informed one, if defendant wanted to know the court’s ruling on his motion to suppress the oral statement, as to which it had been announced previously that a decision would be handed down early on the day the plea was taken, all he or his counsel had to 'do was request the decision from the court or await the ruling. The change of plea was initiated by the advice to the court by defendant’s counsel that his client desired such a change. Judgment affirmed. Reynolds, J. P., Staley, Jr., Greenblott, Cooke and Sweeney, JJ., concur in memorandum by Cooke, J.
§ 1104.105 Regulations governing DoD Components' general terms and conditions. ( a ) *Administrative requirements.* On an interim basis pending completion of the update of the DoDGARs to implement OMB guidance published in 2 CFR part 200, the following regulatory provisions govern the administrative requirements to be included in general terms and conditions of DoD Components' new grants and cooperative agreements: ( 1 ) The provisions of parts 1126 through 1138 of the DoDGARs (2 CFR parts 1126 through 1138, which comprise subchapter D of this chapter) govern the administrative requirements to be included in the general terms and conditions of DoD Components' new grants and cooperative agreements awarded to institutions of higher education, nonprofit organizations, States, local governments, and Indian tribes.
( 2 ) Part 34 of the DoDGARs (32 CFR part 34) governs the administrative requirements to be included in general terms and conditions of DoD Components' grants and cooperative agreements awarded to for-profit entities.
( b ) *National policy requirements.* Part 1122 of the DoDGARs (2 CFR part 1122) governs the national policy requirements to be included in DoD Components' new grants and cooperative agreements awarded to all types of entities.
2007-1675.

#### Poston v. Timmerman-Cooper.

In Prohibition. On motion for judgment on the pleadings. Motion granted. Cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.