alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 40 

Honoring the career and philanthropic contributions of Johnny Carson. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 25, 2005 

Mr. FORTENBERRY (for himself, Ms. WATSON, Mr. TERRY, Mr. KING of Iowa, 

Mrs. BONO, Ms. LEE, Mr. SCHIFF, Mr. MOORE of Kansas, Mr. SHERMAN, Mr. OSBORNE, Mr. HAYWORTH, and Mr. TOM DAVIS of Virginia) 

submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee 

on Government Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Honoring the career and philanthropic contributions of 

Johnny Carson. 

Whereas Johnny Carson was born as John William Carson 

on October 23, 1925, in Corning, Iowa, to Homer ‘‘Kit’’ 

and Ruth Carson; 

Whereas Johnny Carson moved with his family to Norfolk, 

Nebraska, in 1933, served his country as a Navy ensign 

during World War II, and received a bachelor of arts degree in radio and speech in 1949 from the University of 

Nebraska; 

Whereas Johnny Carson became known as the ‘‘King of Late 

Night’’ as he entertained millions of Americans from 

1962 until 1992 as the host of ‘‘The Tonight Show’’; 
2 

•HRES 40 IH 

Whereas Johnny Carson won six Emmy Awards, was inducted into the Television Hall of Fame in 1987, was 

awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom in 1992, and 

received the Kennedy Center Lifetime Achievement 

Award in 1993; 

Whereas Johnny Carson continued to recognize his Midwestern roots by generously donating millions of dollars 

to communities and institutions in Nebraska and Iowa; 

Whereas the United States was saddened by the death of 

Johnny Carson on January 23, 2005, at the age of 79: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) honors Johnny Carson for making us laugh 

3 and for his many philanthropic contributions; and 

4 (2) expresses its deepest sympathy and condo5 lences to his family. 

Æ
# L_2016289EN.01002202.xml

| 25.10.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 289/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.10.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 289/22

---

Corrigendum to Council Regulation (ECSC, EEC, Euratom) No 2799/85 of 27 September 1985 amending the Staff Regulations of officials and the conditions of employment of other servants of the European Communities

(
  Official Journal of the European Communities L 265 of 8 October 1985
  )

On page 7, Article 34 (relating to Article 32):

for:

‘“The servant may appeal against this decision to the Invalidity Committee provided for in Article 4(1) of the Staff Regulations.”’,

read:

‘“The servant may appeal against this decision to the Invalidity Committee provided for in Article 9(1) of the Staff Regulations.”’.

---
#### § 600.115 Metric system of measurement.

The Metric Conversion Act, as amended by the Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act (15 U.S.C. 205) declares that the metric system is the preferred measurement system for U.S. trade and commerce. The Act requires each Federal agency to establish a date or dates in consultation with the Secretary of Commerce, when the metric system of measurement will be used in the agency's procurements, grants, and other business-related activities. Metric implementation may take longer where the use of the system is initially impractical or likely to cause significant inefficiencies in the accomplishment of federally-funded activities. DOE will follow the provisions of E.O. 12770, “Metric Usage in Federal Government Programs.”
§ 429.57 General service lamps. ( a ) *Determination of represented value.* Manufacturers must determine represented values, which includes certified ratings, for each basic model of general service lamp in accordance with following sampling provisions. ( 1 ) The requirements of § 429.11 are applicable to general service lamps, and
( 2 ) For general service incandescent lamps, use § 429.27(a);
( 3 ) For compact fluorescent lamps, use § 429.35(a);
( 4 ) For integrated LED lamps, use § 429.56(a);
( 5 ) For other incandescent lamps, use § 429.27(a);
( 6 ) For other fluorescent lamps, use § 429.35(a); and
( 7 ) For OLED lamps and non-integrated LED lamps, use § 429.56(a).
( b ) *Certification reports.* ( 1 ) The requirements of § 429.12 are applicable to general service lamps;
( 2 ) Values reported in certification reports are represented values;
( 3 ) For general service incandescent lamps, use § 429.27(b);
( 4 ) For compact fluorescent lamps, use § 429.35(b);
( 5 ) For integrated LED lamps, use § 429.56(b); and
( 6 ) For other incandescent lamps, for other fluorescent lamps, for OLED lamps and non-integrated LED lamps, pursuant to § 429.12(b)(13), a certification report must include the following public product-specific information: The testing laboratory's ILAC accreditation body's identification number or other approved identification assigned by the ILAC accreditation body, initial lumen output, input power, lamp efficacy, and power factor. For non-integrated LED lamps, the certification report must also include the input voltage and current used for testing.
( c ) *Rounding requirements.* ( 1 ) Round input power to the nearest tenth of a watt.
( 2 ) Round initial lumen output to three significant digits.
( 3 ) Round lamp efficacy to the nearest tenth of a lumen per watt.
( 4 ) Round power factor to the nearest hundredths place.
( 5 ) Round standby mode power to the nearest tenth of a watt.
[81 FR 72503, Oct. 20, 2016]
§ 200.321 Contracting with small and minority businesses, women's business enterprises, and labor surplus area firms. ( a ) The non-Federal entity must take all necessary affirmative steps to assure that minority businesses, women's business enterprises, and labor surplus area firms are used when possible.
( b ) Affirmative steps must include: ( 1 ) Placing qualified small and minority businesses and women's business enterprises on solicitation lists;
( 2 ) Assuring that small and minority businesses, and women's business enterprises are solicited whenever they are potential sources;
( 3 ) Dividing total requirements, when economically feasible, into smaller tasks or quantities to permit maximum participation by small and minority businesses, and women's business enterprises;
( 4 ) Establishing delivery schedules, where the requirement permits, which encourage participation by small and minority businesses, and women's business enterprises;
( 5 ) Using the services and assistance, as appropriate, of such organizations as the Small Business Administration and the Minority Business Development Agency of the Department of Commerce; and
( 6 ) Requiring the prime contractor, if subcontracts are to be let, to take the affirmative steps listed in paragraphs (b)(1) through (5) of this section.
```

[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 241 (Thursday, December 15, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 90840]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-29886]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-9956-49-Region 6]

Notice of Proposed Administrative Settlement Pursuant to the 
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice; request for public comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency is giving notice of two 
proposed administrative settlements concerning the Scrub-A-Dubb Barrel 
Company Superfund Site, located in the City of Lubbock, Lubbock County, 
Texas.

DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before January 17, 2017.

ADDRESSES: The proposed settlements and additional background 
information relating to the settlements are available for public 
inspection at 1445 Ross Avenue, Dallas, Texas 75202-2733. Copies of the 
proposed settlements may be obtained from Robert Werner, Enforcement 
Officer, 1445 Ross Avenue, Dallas, Texas 75202-2733 or by calling (214) 
665-6724. Comments should reference the Scrub-A-Dubb Barrel Company 
Superfund Site, located in the City of Lubbock, Lubbock County, Texas 
and EPA CERCLA Docket Number 06-09-16 for the Enterprise Products BBCT 
LLC settlement and EPA CERCLA Docket Number 06-10-16 for the Foster 
Testing, Inc. settlement and should be addressed to Robert Werner, 
Enforcement Officer, at the address listed above.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Amy Salinas, Attorney, 1445 Ross 
Avenue, Dallas, Texas 75202-2733 or call (214) 665-8063.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with Section 122(h) of the 
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, 
as amended (CERCLA), 42 U.S.C. 9622(h)(1), notice is hereby given of 
two proposed administrative settlements concerning the Scrub-A-Dubb 
Barrel Company Superfund Site, located in the City of Lubbock, Lubbock 
County, Texas.
    The settlements require two settling parties, Enterprise Products 
BBCT, LLC, and Foster Testing, Inc., to pay a total of $147,800.00 as 
payment of response costs to the Hazardous Substances Superfund. The 
settlements include a covenant not to sue pursuant to Section 107 of 
CERCLA, 42, U.S.C. 9607.
    For thirty (30) days beginning the date of publication of this 
notice, the Agency will receive written comments relating to this 
notice and will receive written comments relating to the settlement. 
The Agency will consider all comments received and may modify or 
withdraw its consent to the settlement if comments received disclose 
facts or considerations which indicate that the settlement is 
inappropriate, improper, or inadequate. The Agency's response to any 
comments received will be available for public inspection at 1445 Ross 
Avenue, Dallas, Texas 75202-2733.

    Dated: November 24, 2016.
Ron Curry,
Regional Administrator (6RA).
[FR Doc. 2016-29886 Filed 12-14-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v James Harte, Appellant.

[815 NYS2d 93]

*476Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Herbert Adlerberg, J.H.O., and Micki A. Scherer, J., at hearing; William A. Wetzel, J., at jury trial and sentence), rendered December 7, 2004, convicting defendant of arson in the second and third degrees, and criminal mischief in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of 8 years, 3 to 6 years, and 2 to 4 years, respectively, unanimously reversed, on the law, and as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, the judgment vacated and the matter remanded to Supreme Court for a new trial.

Initially, we find that the trial court erred in admitting testimony from the store owner’s four employees detailing their conclusions, drawn from their observation as a group of a poor-quality surveillance videotape, that defendant gathered garbage and had set the fire, especially since the videotape was the only evidence the prosecution could muster against defendant, and none of the employees had actually witnessed the incident. Thus, their opinions “were inadmissible conclusions reached by the witness[es] apparently based upon a retrospective view of the events” at the scene *(People v Hackett,*228 AD2d 377, 378 [1996], *lv denied 88*NY2d 986 [1996]; *cf. People v Russell,*79 NY2d 1024 [1992], *affg*165 AD2d 327 [1991]; Prince, Richardson on Evidence § 7-202 [n], at 451-453 [Farrell 11th ed]).

The foregoing is compounded by improper comments made by the prosecutor during summation. Indeed, the prosecutor, at least three times during his closing argument, and despite sustained objections, continually pointed out to the jury that the four employees had identified defendant as the man in the videotape, and then, in concluding, specifically invited the jury to “wonder why [defendant] chose not to testify,” an error of “constitutional dimension” *(People v LaDolce,*196 AD2d 49, 54 [1994]; *see also People v Crimmins,*36 NY2d 230, 241 [1975]), which improperly shifted the burden of proof to defendant *(People v Jamal,*307 AD2d 267, 268 [2003]; *People v Smith,*288 AD2d 496, 497 [2001]).

Accordingly, we find that based upon these cumulative errors, reversal is warranted and a new trial required. To the extent these errors were not preserved, we choose to reach them in the interest of justice. Concur—Buckley, P.J., Andrias, Saxe, Nardelli and Malone, JJ.
State of Arkansas 

Jurisdiction: f1'1eJ bo"uNJ.Q Type of Levy: ---=L=o=ca""I-=So.:a.:.::le:.::s-=a:.:.;n:.::dc...::U""s=.::e'-'T:...::a:.:.:x __ 

Enactment Date: q f2:z.l ZtJ Ordinance No. '3 rr - 5 Tax Rate: _.._/_OZo....:..-~ I~~ . .,4- . Purpose and Use of Tax: UK:..ru... ~VL SJIC~ 

Applicability of Tax: General sales & use tax- Applies to all goods and services taxable under state law. 

Administrative Costs: 3% of gross collections withheld by the state for administration of the tax. 

Credits or Exemptions: Tax subject to same credits & exemptions available under state sales & use tax law 

Subsequent Amendments and Amendment Purpose: 

1. Date: ---------- Amending Ordinance No.-----------

Purpose of Amendment: 

2. Date: ---------- Amending Ordinance No.------ -----

Purpose of Amendment: 

3. Date: - - ---- ---- Amending Ordinance No.-----------

Purpose of Amendment: 

4. Date: - - ---- ---- Amending Ordinance No.-- ---- ---- -

PurposeofAmendment: -------- ---------------------

Is the tax on aviation fuel distributed for airport related purposes: Yes or~ If No, state reason 

for belief that the tax is grandfathered. 

The state of Arkansas administers local taxes for all cities and counties in this state and commits that the 

Arkansas Department of Finance and Administration will notify the FAA of any subsequent amendments 

to this tax that could affect grandfathered status. 

l?;/yj5 

Date 
------·----------

LEVYING TAX 

AND CALLING ELECTION 

ORDINANCE NO. 87-5 

AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR THE LEVY OF A 

LOCAL SALES AND USE TAX AT THE RATE OF 

ONE PERCENT ( l% l ON RECEIPTS FRm1 RETAIL 

SALES WITHIN Tlil:; CITY OF UELBOURNE, 

ARKANSAS; PROVIDING FOR A SPECIAL ELECTION 

ON I September 22 , 19 8 7; PROVIDING THE 

E!·lERGENCY CLAUSE; PROVIDING-FOR A REPEAL OF 

EXISTING ORDINANCE NO. 44 0F' 1967 AND FOR 

OTHER PURPOSES. 

WHEREAS, 'rhere is a great need for immediate improvement of municipal services and a stable source of revenue to 

finance such vital local government services, and 

WHEREAS, Act 25 of lst Extraordinary Session of 1981, 

as amended by Acts 726 and 802 of 1983, provides for the local 

option of adoption of a city-Wide sales and use tax. 

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY TilE CITY COUNCIL 

Ol'' TilE CITY OP HELBOURNE, ARKANSAS: 

Section l. ~evy of· Sales and Use Tax. As authorized 

bv Act 25 of lst Extraordinary Session of 1981, as amended by 
Section 3. That the City Council 

for the City of tielbourne, Arkansas has determined that there is 

u (jreut need to establish a stable source of revenue to finance 

v.i tal munic.i.pal services, and this Ordinance being necessary for 

the preservation of the health, safety, and welfare of the 

Citizens of 1'1elbourne, Arkansas, shall become law immediately upon 

its passage, approval, and publication. 

Passed and approved this _11_ day of 

l98z_.
The following case has been returned to the regular docket pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. XIV(6)(E):

2007-2100.

#### State ex rel. McClaran v. Ontario.

Richland App. No. 06CA99, 2007-Ohio-5254.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS IN THE QUARTERLY REPORT ON
FORM 10-Q OF DIGITAL MICROWAVE CORPORATION FOR THE QUARTER ENDED DECEMBER 31,
1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BE REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          29,114
<SECURITIES>                                    35,342
<RECEIVABLES>                                   88,902
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,685
<INVENTORY>                                     48,038
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               209,809
<PP&E>                                         111,030
<DEPRECIATION>                                  67,573
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 266,021
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           64,601
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           686
<OTHER-SE>                                     200,714
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   266,021
<SALES>                                        211,915
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               211,915
<CGS>                                          149,760
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  149,760
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                55,381
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   662
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 721
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,025
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,205
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,820
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,820
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.07


</TABLE>
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





Grant Thornton LLP

1717 Main Street, Suite 1500 Dallas, TX 75201-4667



T214.561.2300

F214.561.2370
GrantThornton.com

linkd.in/GrantThorntonUS

twitter.com/GrantThorntonUS

Board of Directors and Shareholders

Situs Holdings LLC



We have examined management’s assertion, included
in the accompanying Report of Management on Compliance (“Management’s Assertion”), that Situs Holdings LLC (the
“Company”) complied with certain servicing criteria set forth in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of the U.S. Securities
and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB included in Exhibit A as of December 31, 2013 and for the period January 1, 2013
through December 31, 2013, with respect to the Company’s Operating or Trust Advisor Services performed over the deals listed
in Appendix B (the “Platform”). Management is responsible for the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicing
criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assertion about the Company’s compliance with
the applicable servicing criteria for the Platform based on our examination.



Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards
of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence
about the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicing criteria for the Services and performing such other procedures
as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination was not designed to detect material noncompliance that may have
occurred prior to the period covered by this report and that may have affected the Company’s activities with respect to the
Platform during the period covered by this report. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicing criteria.



In our opinion, management’s assertion that Situs
Holdings LLC complied with the aforementioned minimum servicing standards as of December 31, 2013 and for the period January 1,
2013 through December 31, 2013, for the Services is fairly stated, in all material respects.







Dallas, Texas
March 10, 2014











Grant Thornton LIP

U.S. member firm of Grant Thornton International Ltd
Exhibit 35.3







| | 
| | 







VIA EMAIL



Barclays Commercial Mortgage Securities LLC

745 Seventh Avenue

New York, New York 10019

Attention: Daniel Vinson, Vice President

Email: daniel.vinson@barclays.com



17g5informationprovider@usbank.com





Annual Statement of Compliance

UBS-Barclays Commercial Mortgage Trust 2013-C6





| | Re: | The Pooling and Servicing Agreement (the "Agreement") dated as of April 1, 2013
entered into by Barclays Commercial Mortgage Securities LLC, as depositor, Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National
Association, as master servicer, Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as special servicer, Park Bridge Lender Services LLC, as operating
advisor, and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee, certificate administrator, paying agent and custodian
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





I, Kimberly O. Jacobs,
a Senior Vice President of U.S. Bank National Association, as Certificate Administrator hereby certify that:



(1) A review of the activities
of the Certificate Administrator during the preceding calendar year (the “Reporting Period”) and of the performance
of the Certificate Administrator under the Agreement have been made under my supervision; and



(2)
To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Certificate Administrator has fulfilled its obligations under the Agreement
in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.



Capitalized terms used
but not defined herein have the meanings set forth in the Agreement.







Date: March 15, 2016





| | U.S. Bank National Association, as Certificate Administrator and Custodian
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |                                                                           
| |                                                                           
| | By:  /s/ Kimberly O. Jacobs                                               
| | Kimberly O. Jacobs                                                        
| | Senior Vice President
Editorial Note on Part 180
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 180 appear at 79 FR 75879, Dec. 19, 2014.

§ 180.105 How is this part written? ( a ) This part uses a “plain language” format to make it easier for the general public and business community to use. The section headings and text, often in the form of questions and answers, must be read together.
( b ) Pronouns used within this part, such as “I” and “you,” change from subpart to subpart depending on the audience being addressed.
( c ) The “Covered Transactions” diagram in the appendix to this part shows the levels or “tiers” at which a Federal agency may enforce an exclusion.
Editorial Note on Part 180
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 180 appear at 79 FR 75879, Dec. 19, 2014.

§ 180.805 What notice does the debarring official give me if I am proposed for debarment? After consideration of the causes in § 180.800, if the debarring official proposes to debar you, the official sends you a Notice of Proposed Debarment, pursuant to § 180.615, advising you— ( a ) That the debarring official is considering debarring you;
( b ) Of the reasons for proposing to debar you in terms sufficient to put you on notice of the conduct or transactions upon which the proposed debarment is based;
( c ) Of the cause(s) under § 180.800 upon which the debarring official relied for proposing your debarment;
( d ) Of the applicable provisions of this subpart, subpart F of this part, and any other agency procedures governing debarment; and
( e ) Of the governmentwide effect of a debarment from procurement and nonprocurement programs and activities.