T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). K Y / R es ear ch NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON

UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T J OS E AN T ON I O D E L C I DM A ZA RI EG O S, P et i t i on er , v. E R I C H . H O L D E R J r ., A tto rn e yG e n e r a l, R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 07- 74470 A ge nc yN o. A 098- 113- 305 ME MOR AN DU M *

O n P e t i t i on f

orR e vi e w of

a n O r de rof

the B o ar do f I m m ig r a tio n A p p e a ls S ubm i tt e d J anua ry11, 2010 ** B e f o r e : B E E Z E R , T R O T T , a n dB Y B E E , C ir c u it Ju d g e s . Jose A nt on i o D elC i d-M az ar i egos, a nat i ve and ci t i ze n o f G uat em al a, pe t i t i ons pr o s e f

orr e vi e w of

the B oar d of

I m m i gr a t i on A ppe a l s or de rdi s m i s s i ng hi s appe a l f

r om a n i m m i gr a t i on j udge ’ s de c i s i on de ny i ng hi s appl i c a t i on f or 

# FI LED JAN 21 2 010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALSK Y / Res ea r ch 07- 74470 2 as ylum , w i thh ol di ng of re m ov al , and rel i ef un der the C on vent i on A gai nstT orture ( “ C A T ” ) . O urj ur i s di c t i on i s gove rne d by8 U . S . C . § 1252. W e r e vi e w de novo q u e s tio n s o f

law , C er ez o v. Mukasey , 512 F . 3d 1163, 1166 ( 9th C i r . 2008) , e xc e pt t o the e xt e nttha tde f

e r e nc e i s ow e d t o the B I A ’ s de t e rm i na t i on of the gove rni ng s ta tu te s an dr e g u la tio n s , S im e o n o vv . A s h c r o ft , 3 7 1 F .3 d5 3 2 , 5 3 5 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 4 ) . W e r e v ie w f

a c tu a l f in d in g s f o rs ub s tan tia l e v id e n c e . Zehat ye v. G on zales , 453 F . 3d 1182, 1184- 85 ( 9th C i r . 2006) . W e de nyi n parta nd di s m i s s i n partthe p e t i t i o n f o rr e v i e w. W e r e j e c tD e l C i d- M a z ar i e gos ’ c l a i m tha the i s e l i gi bl e f ora s y l um a nd w i thhol di ng of

r e m ova l ba s e d on hi s m e m be r s hi p i n apa rt i c ul ars oc i a l gr oup, na m e l y , G ua t e m a l an m a l e s w ho r e f us e t o j oi n gangs , orba s e d on hi s a nt i - gang p o litic a l o p in io n . See San tos-L em us v. Mukasey , 54 2 F . 3d 73 8, 74 5-46 (9th C i r. 2008) ( r e j e c t i ng a s apart i c ul ars oc i a l gr oup “ y oung m e n i n E l S a l va dorr e s i s t i ng gang vi ol ence ”) (i nt ernalqu ot at i on om i tt ed); B arri os v. H older , 581 F . 3d 849, 85 4-56 (9th C i r. 20 09 ) ( re fusa l t o j oi n a gang do es no tam ou ntt o p ol i t i ca l op i ni on . ) A cc ordi ng l y, because D elC i d-M az ar i egos fa i l ed t o d em on strat e thathe w as pe r s e c ut e d on a c c ountof apr ot e c t e d gr ound, w e de nythe pe t i t i on a s t o hi s a s y l um a n dw ith h o ld in g o f

r e m o v a l c la im s . Se e id . a t856.K Y / Res ea r ch 07- 74470 3 W e l a c k j ur i s di c t i on t o c ons i de rD e l C i d- M a z ar i e gos ’ C A T c l a i m be c aus e he d idn o t e x h au s t it b e f

o r e th e a g e n c y . Se e B a rr o n v . A s h c r o ft , 358 F . 3d 674, 677- 78 (9th C i r. 20 04 ). P E T I T I O N F O R R E V I E W D E N I E D in p a r t ; D I S M I S S E D in p a r t .