alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
228 So.2d 483

#### Andrew ROUGHT v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 50225.

Dec. 11, 1969

In re: Andrew Rought applying for writs of certiorari and habeas corpus.

The application is denied. The showing made does not warrant the exercise of our supervisory or original jurisdiction in this case.

BARHAM, J.,

is of the opinion that the application and returns warrant the ordering of a hearing on the application for writ of habeas corpus. No counsel at arraignment (reflected in minutes) allegation that counsel was not seen until day of trial, and record reflecting a denial of a motion to suppress as being untimely filed require a hearing for the determination of the merits of the application.
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO EXCHANGE ACT RULES 13a**-14(a) AND 15d-14(a)

** **

I, Adam D. Portnoy, certifythat:

 

1.               I have reviewedthis Amendment No. 3 to Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of HospitalityProperties Trust;

 

2.               Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3.               Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

 
| Date:  July 25, 2008 | /s/ Adam D.  Portnoy |
|---------------------------|----------------------|
|                      | Adam D.  Portnoy     |
|                      | Managing  Trustee    |

 

----
#### In the Matter of Nicholas Carroll and of Those Similarly Situated, Petitioners, v. Mario Procaccino, as Comptroller of the City of New York, Respondent.

Determination of the comptroller unanimously affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. Because of the somewhat confused presentation on the argument we state specifically that this confirmation does not affect the rate of pay of petitioners for any period subsequent to July 1, 1968. Concur — Stevens, P. J., Eager, Tilzer, Markewich and Steuer, JJ.
#### § 200.309 Modifications to Period of Performance.

If a Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity approves an extension, or if a recipient extends under § 200.308(e)(2), the Period of Performance will be amended to end at the completion of the extension. If a termination occurs, the Period of Performance will be amended to end upon the effective date of termination. If a renewal award is issued, a distinct Period of Performance will begin.
ISSUE : 2 of 19/03/2004 SB 90-25-012 ANNEX 1 

 DATE : 18/01/2001 PAGE : 1 / 2 

SB – Form CE 025 – 10/93 

58(/8&,(1&283(7,6628'81)5$1&(7(/(3+21(7(/()$;6,7$&+56,&5

	


SERVICE BULLETIN ANNEX 

N° 90-25-012 

ATA system: 25 

SUBJECT: 

PASSENGER SEAT ASSEMBLIES 

BACKREST LINKS INSPECTION 
	


SERVICE BULLETIN 

ISSUE : 2 of 19/03/2004 SB 90-25-012 ANNEX 1 

 DATE : 18/01/2001 PAGE : 2 / 2 

SB – Form CE 025 – 10/93 

58(/8&,(1&283(7,6628'81)5$1&(7(/(3+21(7(/()$;6,7$&+56,&5

List of SICMA seat series concerned by the service bulletin application. 

SEAT 

SERIES 

ALL SEAT P/Ns AND S/Ns 

ARE AFFECTED REMARKS 

SERIES 91xx 

9140 All seat P/Ns and S/Ns are affected - 

9166 All seat P/Ns and S/Ns are affected - 

9173 All seat P/Ns and S/Ns are affected - 

9174 All seat P/Ns and S/Ns are affected - 

9184 All seat P/Ns and S/Ns are affected - 

9188 All seat P/Ns and S/Ns are affected - 

9196 All seat P/Ns and S/Ns are affected - 

91B7 All seat P/Ns and S/Ns are affected - 

91B8 All seat P/Ns and S/Ns are affected - 

91C0 All seat P/Ns and S/Ns are affected - 

91C2 All seat P/Ns and S/Ns are affected - 

91C4 All seat P/Ns and S/Ns are affected - 

91C5 All seat P/Ns and S/Ns are affected - 

SERIES 93xx 

9301 All seat P/Ns and S/Ns are affected - 

SERIES 95xx 

9501 

Only these seats are affected : 

9501311-05, 9501301-06, 9501311-15, 

9501301-16, 9501441-30, 9501441-33, 

9501311-55, 9501301-56, 9501441-83, 

9501441-95, 9501311-97, 9501301-98 

Affected seats are equipped with In-armtable. Standard seats are not concerned.
#### § 73.28 Security background checks for secure transfer of nuclear materials.

Licensees are excepted from the security background check provisions in Section 170I of the AEA if they have not received Orders from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission containing requirements for background checks for trustworthiness and reliability that include fingerprinting and criminal history record checks as a prerequisite for unescorted access to radioactive materials.

[72 FR 3027, Jan. 24, 2007]
EX-31Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications.

 

I, Daniel Vinson, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered bythis report on Form 10-K of the UBS-Barclays Commercial Mortgage Trust 2013-C6 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

 

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for theperiod covered,by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and exceptas disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreementsin all material respects; and

 

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestationreports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this reportin accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to thisreport, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have beendisclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

Ingiving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:

 

MidlandLoan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as Special Servicer,U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee prior to October 17, 2022, U.S. Bank Trust Company, National Association, as Trusteeon and after October 17, 2022, U.S. Bank National Association, as Certificate Administrator prior to October 17, 2022, U.S. BankTrust Company, National Association, as Certificate Administrator on and after October 17, 2022, U.S. Bank National Association,as Custodian, Park Bridge Lender Services LLC, as Operating Advisor, Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association,as Primary Servicer for the Santa Anita Mall Mortgage Loan, Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association,as Special Servicer for the Santa Anita Mall Mortgage Loan, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Trustee for the Santa AnitaMall Mortgage Loan, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Custodian for the Santa Anita Mall Mortgage Loan, and Situs Holdings,LLC, as Operating Advisor for the Santa Anita Mall Mortgage Loan.

 

Dated:March 27, 2023

 

/s/Daniel Vinson

 

Daniel Vinson

 

ChiefExecutive Officer 

(seniorofficer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
§ 1.641 What legal authority must a third-party certification body have to qualify for accreditation? ( a ) A third-party certification body seeking accreditation from a recognized accreditation body or from FDA must demonstrate that it has the authority (as a governmental entity or as a legal entity with contractual rights) to perform such examinations of facilities, their process(es), and food(s) as are necessary to determine compliance with the applicable food safety requirements of the FD&C Act and FDA regulations, and conformance with applicable industry standards and practices and to issue certifications where appropriate based on a review of the findings of such examinations. This includes authority to: ( 1 ) Review any relevant records;
( 2 ) Conduct onsite audits of an eligible entity; and
( 3 ) Suspend or withdraw certification for failure to comply with applicable requirements.
( b ) A third-party certification body seeking accreditation must demonstrate that it is capable of exerting the authority (as a governmental entity or as legal entity with contractual rights) necessary to meet the applicable requirements of accreditation under this subpart if accredited.
H. Res. 323 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

May 17, 2017. 

Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall 

be in order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 115) to 

amend title 18, United States Code, to provide additional aggravating factors for the imposition of the death penalty 

based on the status of the victim. All points of order against 

consideration of the bill are waived. In lieu of the amendment 

in the nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee 

on the Judiciary now printed in the bill, an amendment in 

the nature of a substitute consisting of the text of Rules 

Committee Print 115–17 shall be considered as adopted. The 

bill, as amended, shall be considered as read. All points of 

order against provisions in the bill, as amended, are waived. 

The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the 

bill, as amended, and on any further amendment thereto, to 

final passage without intervening motion except: (1) one hour 

of debate equally divided and controlled by the chair and 
2 

•HRES 323 EH 

ranking minority member of the Committee on the Judiciary; 

and (2) one motion to recommit with or without instructions. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
Order entered February 4, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-00480-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF B.Q.T., A CHILD

On Appeal from the 255th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DF-12-07404-S

ORDER

We GRANT appellant’s February 2, 2015 motion for an extension of time to file a reply 

brief. Appellant shall file a reply brief by FEBRUARY 12, 2015.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

JUSTICE
§ 780.32 Response and request for hearing. Any party within thirty (30) days after service of the notice of docketing of the application: ( a ) May file with the Board a response containing a concise statement of the facts or law or any other relevant information which that party believes should be considered by the Board in opposition to or in support of the proposed application; and
( b ) May file a request for a hearing or for a decision on the record.
#### § 782.500 Who in USAID determines that a recipient other than an individual violated the requirements of this part?

The Director of the Office of Acquisition and Assistance is the official authorized to make the determination under 2 CFR 182.500.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 756 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 756

  Expressing support for designation of March 21, 2018, as ``National 
                        Rosie the Riveter Day''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 27, 2018

    Mr. Huffman (for himself, Mr. Fitzpatrick, Ms. Speier, and Mr. 
 DeSaulnier) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
              the Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Expressing support for designation of March 21, 2018, as ``National 
                        Rosie the Riveter Day''.

Whereas ``National Rosie the Riveter Day'' is a collective national effort to 
        raise awareness of the 16,000,000 women working during World War II;
Whereas Americans have chosen to honor female workers who contributed on the 
        home front during World War II;
Whereas these women left their homes to work or volunteer full-time in 
        factories, farms, shipyards, airplane factories, banks, and other 
        institutions in support of the military overseas;
Whereas these women worked with the USO and Red Cross, drove trucks, riveted 
        airplane parts, collected critical materials, rolled bandages, and 
        served on rationing boards;
Whereas it is fitting and proper to recognize and preserve the history and 
        legacy of working women, including volunteer women, during World War II 
        to promote cooperation and fellowship among such women and their 
        descendants;
Whereas these women and their descendants wish to further the advancement of 
        patriotic ideas, excellence in the workplace, and loyalty to the United 
        States of America; and
Whereas March 21, 2018, during Women's History Month, would be an appropriate 
        date to designate as ``National Rosie the Riveter Day'': Now, therefore, 
        be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) supports the designation of ``National Rosie the 
        Riveter Day''; and
            (2) acknowledges the important role played by women in 
        World War II.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

Exhibit 3(b)


                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                       OF                          [STAMP]
                          CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                          ENCORE COMPUTER CORPORATION


                         Pursuant to Section 242 of the
                    Corporation Law of the State of Delaware


       ENCORE COMPUTER CORPORATION (the "Corporation"), organized and existing
under and by virtue of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware,
does hereby certify:

       First:    That at a meeting of the Board of Directors of the Corporation,
resolutions were duly adopted, pursuant to Section 242 of the General
Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, setting forth an amendment to the
Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation and declaring said Amendment to
be advisable. The stockholders of the Corporation duly approved said proposed
Amendment in accordance with Sections 228 and 242 of the General Corporation Law
of the State of Delaware. The resolution setting forth the Amendment is as
follows:

       RESOLVED: That Article FOURTH of the Certificate of Incorporation of the
                 Corporation be and hereby is amended to read in its entirety as
                 follows:

                 FOURTH.  The total number of shares of stock which the
                 Corporation shall have authority to issue is Ten Million
                 (10,000,000) Shares of Common Stock, $.01 par value per share.

<PAGE>

     SECOND: The capital of the Corporation will not be reduced under or by
reason of the Amendment herein certified.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Encore Computer Corporation has caused this Certificate
to be signed by Kenneth G. Fisher, its President, and attested by Henry
Burkhardt III, its Assistant Secretary, this 12 day of July, 1983.

                                                     ENCORE COMPUTER CORPORATION

                                                     By: /s/ Kenneth G. Fisher
                                                         -----------------------
                                                         President

ATTEST:

/s/ Henry G. Burkhardt III
--------------------------
Assistant Secretary
H. Res. 789

In the House of Representatives, U.S., 

May 3, 2006.

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule 

XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the 

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of 

the bill (H.R. 4954) to improve maritime and cargo security 

through enhanced layered defenses, and for other purposes. 

The first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. All 

points of order against consideration of the bill are waived. 

General debate shall be confined to the bill and shall not exceed one hour, with 40 minutes equally divided and controlled 

by the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on Homeland Security and 20 minutes equally divided 

and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member 

of the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure. 

After general debate the bill shall be considered for amendment under the five-minute rule. It shall be in order to consider as an original bill for the purpose of amendment under 

the five-minute rule the amendment in the nature of a sub-
2

•HRES 789 EH 

stitute recommended by the Committee on Homeland Security now printed in the bill. The committee amendment in the 

nature of a substitute shall be considered as read. All points 

of order against the committee amendment in the nature of 

a substitute are waived. Notwithstanding clause 11 of rule 

XVIII, no amendment to the committee amendment in the 

nature of a substitute shall be in order except those printed 

in the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this 

resolution. Each such amendment may be offered only in the 

order printed in the report, may be offered only by a Member 

designated in the report, shall be considered as read, shall be 

debatable for the time specified in the report equally divided 

and controlled by the proponent and an opponent, shall not 

be subject to amendment, and shall not be subject to a demand for division of the question in the House or in the 

Committee of the Whole. All points of order against such 

amendments are waived. At the conclusion of consideration of 

the bill for amendment the Committee shall rise and report 

the bill to the House with such amendments as may have 

been adopted. Any Member may demand a separate vote in 

the House on any amendment adopted in the Committee of 

the Whole to the bill or to the committee amendment in the 

nature of a substitute. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to final 
3

•HRES 789 EH 

passage without intervening motion except one motion to recommit with or without instructions.

Attest: 

Clerk.
§ 1108.3 Definitions of terms used in the Governmentwide cost principles or single audit requirements. ( a ) Some DoDGARs provisions state that DoD Components or recipients must comply with single audit or cost principles requirements in a Governmentwide issuance that contains defined terms and include the requirements by reference to the issuance without restating them.
( b ) For any term in one of those issuances, this part includes the definition of the term only if the DoDGARs also use that term directly.
( c ) If the DoDGARs only use the term indirectly, *i.e.,* through the DoDGARs' reference to the issuance, then this part will not include a definition and a user of the DoDGARs should consult definitions in the pertinent Governmentwide source, as follows: ( 1 ) The Single Audit Act requirements for audits of recipients and subrecipients that are in subpart F of OMB guidance in 2 CFR part 200;
( 2 ) The Governmentwide cost principles for institutions of higher education, nonprofit organizations, States, local governments, and Indian tribes that are contained in subpart E of OMB guidance in 2 CFR part 200; and
( 3 ) The cost principles for for-profit entities at Subpart 31.2 of the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) at 48 CFR part 31, as supplemented by provisions of the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement at subpart 231.2 of 48 CFR part 231.
§ 1138.200 Purpose of SUB Article II. SUB Article II specifies requirements concerning subrecipients' unique entity identifiers and pre-award risk assessments. It also references requirements in REP Article IV to report on subawards and subrecipients' executive compensation. It thereby partially implements OMB guidance in: ( a ) 2 CFR parts 25 and 170;
( b ) 2 CFR 200.207; 200.300(b), as it applies to subaward reporting; and 200.331(b); and
( c ) Subpart C of 2 CFR part 180, as implemented by DoD at 2 CFR part 1125.
Order filed September 2 , 2021

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 21

- 00 266

- CV

____________ LARRY JOHNS , Appellant

V.

C ARL R. GRANTOM AND LEIGH AN N GRANTOM , Appellee s

On Appeal fro m the 333rd District Court

Harris County, Texa s Tr ial Court Ca use No. 2018

- 42908



### ORDER
The notice of appeal in this case was filed May 14 , 2021. The clerk responsible for preparing the record notified this court that appellant has not made
pa y ment for the record. No evidence that appellant has estab lish ed indigenc e has been filed. See Tex. R. Civ. P. 145. On July 8 , 2021, this court notified appellant that the appeal was subject to dismissal unless appellant filed a response with proof of pay m ent fo r the record. No response was filed. Therefore , the cour t issues the following ord er.Appellant is ordered to demonstrate to this court that he has made

arrangements to pay for the clerk’s record on or before September 17 , 2021. See Tex. R. App. P. 35

. 3(c). If appellant fails to do so, the appeal will be di smis sed. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b).

PER CURIAM

Panel Consists of Justices Wise, Bourliot, and Zimmerer

.
#### § 1108.160 Direct costs.

*Direct costs* means any costs that are identified specifically with a particular final cost objective, such as an award, in accordance with the applicable cost principles.
§ 1.305 Federal agency responsibilities. The head of each Federal agency that awards and administers grants and agreements subject to the guidance in this subtitle is responsible for: ( a ) Implementing the guidance in this subtitle.
( b ) Ensuring that the agency's components and subcomponents comply with the agency's implementation of the guidance.
( c ) Performing other functions specified in this subtitle.
#### MANDEL, Appellant, v. HOPKINS et al., Respondents.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

June 19, 1914.)

Action by Adolph Mandel against David Hopkins and another, as executors, etc.

M. S. Harris, of New York City, for appellant.

W. S. Bennet, of New York City, for respondents.

No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Order filed. See, also, 148 N. Y. Supp. 1129.