alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
H. Res. 833

In the House of Representatives, U.S., 

June 6, 2006.

Whereas women of all backgrounds have the power to greatly 

reduce their risk of common diseases through preventive 

measures such as a healthy lifestyle and frequent medical 

screenings; 

Whereas significant disparities exist in the prevalence of disease among women of different backgrounds, including 

women with disabilities, African American women, Asian/

Pacific Islander women, Latinas, and American Indian/

Alaska Native women; 

Whereas since healthy habits should begin at a young age, 

and preventive care saves Federal dollars designated to 

health care, it is important to raise awareness among 

women and girls of key female health issues; 

Whereas National Women’s Health Week begins on Mother’s 

Day annually and celebrates the efforts of national and 

community organizations working with partners and volunteers to improve awareness of key women’s health 

issues; and 

Whereas in 2006, the week of May 14 through May 20, is 

dedicated as the National Women’s Health Week: Now, 

therefore, be it

Resolved, That the House of Representatives—
2

•HRES 833 EH 

(1) recognizes the importance of preventing diseases 

that commonly affect women; 

(2) calls on the people of the United States to use 

National Women’s Health Week as an opportunity to 

learn about health issues that face women; 

(3) calls on the women of the United States to observe National Women’s Check-Up Day by receiving preventive screenings from their health care providers; and 

(4) recognizes the importance of programs that provide research and collect data on common diseases in 

women.

Attest: 

Clerk.
#### OSTROW v. LESSER.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department.

February 4, 1915.)

Covenants (§ 96*) — Actions for Breach — Covenant Against Incumbrance.

A grantee under a deed containing a covenant against incumbrance cannot recover against the grantor the amount of a judgment, which was a lien upon the property by showing that he paid the amount thereof to his purchaser, without also showing that the purchaser took title subject to the incumbrance, or that the payment removed the incumbrance.

[Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Covenants, Cent. Dig. *§§*111-129; Dec. Dig. § 96.*]

Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Bronx, Second District.

Action by Daniel Ostrow against Albert D. Lesser. Judgment for the plaintiff, and defendant appeals.

Reversed, and new trial granted.

*513Argued January term, 1915, before GUY, BIJUR, and GAVEGAN, JJ.

Tobias A. Keppler, of New York City (Sidney V. Hirsh, of New York City, of counsel), for appellant.

Locker & Locker, of New York City (Benjamin Locker, of New York City, of counsel), for respondent.

*

For other cases see same topic & § number in Dec. & Am. Digs. 1907 to date, & Rep’r Indexes

BIJUR, J.

Plaintiff’s claim ultimately resolved itself into a demand for the amount of an incumbrance based on a breach of warranty of title. Plaintiff was defendant’s grantee under a deed containing a warranty against incumbrance. When plaintiff conveyed to one Jans, it was discovered that there existed a lien on the property in the form *>*of a judgment against defendant’s grantor. Thereupon plaintiff claims to have paid to Jans the amount of this judgment, with -interest to date. It was not shown that Jans took title subject to the incumbrance, nor that the incumbrance was removed by payment of the judgment. Under the circumstances, plaintiff cannot recover. See Delavergne v. Norris, *7*Johns. 358, 5 Am. Dec. 281.

Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event. All concur.
§ 709.1 Purpose. This part: ( a ) Describes the categories of individuals who are subject for counterintelligence evaluation processing;
( b ) Provides guidelines for the counterintelligence evaluation process, including the use of counterintelligence-scope polygraph examinations, and for the use of event-specific polygraph examinations; and
( c ) Provides guidelines for protecting the rights of individual DOE employees and DOE contractor employees subject to this part.
EXHIBIT 99.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350,  As Adopted Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  Granite Real Estate Investment Trust

In connection with the annual report of Granite Real Estate Investment Trust (the "Company") on Form 40-F for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2016 (the "Report") to which this certification is an exhibit, I, Michael Forsayeth, Trustee and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

Date:
March 1, 2017

By:

/s/ MICHAEL FORSAYETH Name: Michael Forsayeth
Title: Trustee and Chief Executive Officer


---





EXHIBIT 99.1

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350,  As Adopted Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  Granite REIT Inc.

In
connection with the annual report of Granite REIT Inc. (the "Company") on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 (the "Report") to which this
certification is an exhibit, I, Michael Forsayeth, Director and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

Date:
March 1, 2017

By:

/s/ MICHAEL FORSAYETH Name: Michael Forsayeth
Title: Director and Chief Executive Officer


---



QuickLinks
<PAGE>
 
                                                                     Exhibit 3.3

                        INDUSTRIAL TRAINING CORPORATION

                             ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT

     Industrial Training Corporation, a Maryland corporation, having its
principal office in Herndon, Fairfax County, Virginia (hereinafter called the
"Corporation"), hereby certifies to the State Department of Assessments and
Taxation of Maryland that:

     FIRST:  The charter of the Corporation is hereby amended by striking out
Article SECOND and inserting in lieu thereof the following:

          SECOND:  "The name of the Corporation is ITC LEARNING CORPORATION."

     SECOND:   The board of directors of the Corporation (the "Board of
Directors"), at a meeting duly convened and held on January 29, 1997, adopted
resolutions which set forth the foregoing amendment to the Charter, declaring
that the said amendment of the Charter was advisable and directing that it be
submitted for action thereon at the annual meeting of stockholders of the
Corporation to be held on May 6,1997.

     THIRD:  Notice setting forth the said amendment and stating that a purpose
of the meeting of the stockholders would be to take action thereon, was given as
required by law, to all stockholders of the Corporation entitled to vote
thereon; and like notice was given to all stockholders of the Corporation not
entitled to vote thereon, whose contract rights as expressly set forth in the
Charter would be altered by the amendment.  The amendment of the Charter of the
Corporation as hereinabove set forth was approved by the stockholders of the
Corporation at said meeting by the affirmative vote of two-thirds (2/3) of all
the votes entitled to be cast thereon.

     FOURTH:  The amendment of the charter of the Corporation as herein before
set forth has been duly advised by the board of directors and approved by the
stockholders of the Corporation.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF:  Industrial Training Corporation, has caused these
presents to be signed in its name and on its behalf by its Vice President its
corporate seal to be hereunto affixed by its Secretary on May 9, 1997, and its
Vice President acknowledged that these Articles of Amendment are the act and
deed of Industrial Training Corporation and, under the penalties of perjury,
that the matters and facts set forth herein with respect to authorization and
approval are true in all material respects to the best of this knowledge,
information and belief.

ATTEST:                         INDUSTRIAL TRAINING CORPORATION

/s/ Anne J. Fletcher             By: /s/ Christopher E. Mack 
--------------------                 -----------------------
Anne J. Fletcher                     Christopher E. Mack
Secretary                            Vice President
#### HALL v. WOODMERE HOMESTEAD CO. et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

June 5, 1914.)

Action by Martin V. W. Hall against the Woodmere Homestead Company and others.

No opinion. Motion to dismiss appeal denied, without costs. See, also, 148 N. Y. Supp. 1118.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of  AccuPoll  Holding  Corp.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the fiscal  quarter  ended  March 31, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, Dennis Vadura, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

May 16, 2005                                           /s/ Dennis Vadura
                                                       -------------------------
                                                       Dennis Vadura
                                                       Chief Executive Officer

A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
required by Section 906,  has been  provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission or its
staff upon request.
IV 

House Calendar No. 2 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 59 

[Report No. 109–2] 

Providing for consideration of the concurrent resolution (H. Con. Res. 36) 

expressing the continued support of Congress for equal access of military 

recruiters to institutions of higher education. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 1, 2005 

Mr. COLE, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; 

which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the concurrent resolution (H. 

Con. Res. 36) expressing the continued support of Congress for equal access of military recruiters to institutions of higher education. 

1 Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution 

2 it shall be in order to consider in the House the concurrent 

3 resolution (H. Con. Res. 36) expressing the continued sup4 port of Congress for equal access of military recruiters to 

5 institutions of higher education. The concurrent resolution 

6 shall be considered as read. The previous question shall 
2 

•HRES 59 RH 

1 be considered as ordered on the concurrent resolution and 

2 preamble to final adoption without intervening motion or 

3 demand for division of the question except: (1) one hour 

4 of debate on the concurrent resolution equally divided and 

5 controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member 

6 of the Committee on Armed Services; and (2) one motion 

7 to recommit. 

House Calendar No. 2 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 59 

[Report No. 109–2] 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the concurrent resocation. tary recruiters to institutions of higher edu- ued support of Congress for equal access of mili- lution (H. Con. Res. 36) expressing the continFEBRUARY 1, 2005 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed
§ 950.21 Notification of covered event. ( a ) A sponsor shall submit in writing to the Claims Administrator a notification that a covered event has occurred that has delayed the schedule for construction or testing and that may cause covered delay. The sponsor shall submit the notification to the Claims Administrator no later than thirty (30) days of the end of the covered event and contain the following information: ( 1 ) A description and explanation of the covered event, including supporting documentation of the event;
( 2 ) The duration of the delay in the schedule for construction, testing and full power operation, and the schedule for inspections, tests, analyses and acceptance criteria, if applicable;
( 3 ) The sponsor's projection of the duration of covered delay;
( 4 ) A revised schedule for construction, testing and full power operation, including the dates of system level construction or testing that had been conducted prior to the event; and
( 5 ) A revised inspections, tests, analyses, and acceptance criteria schedule, if applicable, including the dates of Commission review of inspections, tests, analyses, and acceptance criteria that had been conducted prior to the event.
( b ) An authorized representative of the sponsor shall sign the notification of a covered event, certify the notification is made in good faith and the covered event is not an exclusion as specified in § 950.14(b), and represent that the supporting information is accurate and complete to the sponsor's knowledge and belief.
Exhibit 32.2

Exhibit 32.2 Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Calgon Carbon Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Leroy M. Ball, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company for the periods
presented therein.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Leroy M. Ball      
|Chief Financial Officer
|March 27, 2006         

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and
shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.



32
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 348 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
H. Res. 348

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                          May 23, 2017.
    Resolved, That at any time after adoption of this resolution the Speaker 
may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XVIII, declare the House resolved into the 
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of the 
bill (H.R. 953) to amend the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act 
and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to clarify Congressional intent 
regarding the regulation of the use of pesticides in or near navigable waters, 
and for other purposes. The first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. 
All points of order against consideration of the bill are waived. General debate 
shall be confined to the bill and shall not exceed one hour equally divided and 
controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on 
Transportation and Infrastructure. After general debate the bill shall be 
considered for amendment under the five-minute rule. It shall be in order to 
consider as an original bill for the purpose of amendment under the five-minute 
rule an amendment in the nature of a substitute consisting of the text of Rules 
Committee Print 115-21. That amendment in the nature of a substitute shall be 
considered as read. All points of order against that amendment in the nature of 
a substitute are waived. No amendment to that amendment in the nature of a 
substitute shall be in order except those printed in the report of the Committee 
on Rules accompanying this resolution. Each such amendment may be offered only 
in the order printed in the report, may be offered only by a Member designated 
in the report, shall be considered as read, shall be debatable for the time 
specified in the report equally divided and controlled by the proponent and an 
opponent, shall not be subject to amendment, and shall not be subject to a 
demand for division of the question in the House or in the Committee of the 
Whole. All points of order against such amendments are waived. At the conclusion 
of consideration of the bill for amendment the Committee shall rise and report 
the bill to the House with such amendments as may have been adopted. Any Member 
may demand a separate vote in the House on any amendment adopted in the 
Committee of the Whole to the bill or to the amendment in the nature of a 
substitute made in order as original text. The previous question shall be 
considered as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to final passage 
without intervening motion except one motion to recommit with or without 
instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 724 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 724

 Honoring Leonidas Ralph Mecham, Director of the Administrative Office 
of the United States Courts and Secretary of the Judicial Conference of 
                           the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 14, 2006

 Mr. Sensenbrenner (for himself, Mr. Conyers, Mr. Cannon, Mr. Smith of 
Texas, Mr. Inglis of South Carolina, Mr. Feeney, Mr. Scott of Virginia, 
 and Mr. Coble) submitted the following resolution; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Honoring Leonidas Ralph Mecham, Director of the Administrative Office 
of the United States Courts and Secretary of the Judicial Conference of 
                           the United States.

Whereas Ralph Mecham has served under three chief justices for more than 20 
        years as the Director of the Administrative Office of the United States 
        Courts, earning him the distinction of the longest serving director in 
        the agency's history;
Whereas Ralph Mecham has focused on enhancing support to the Judicial 
        Conference;
Whereas Ralph Mecham has worked to secure sufficient resources for the judiciary 
        in tight budget climates;
Whereas Ralph Mecham assisted in the creation of a program to obtain funding for 
        new courthouses to replace aging, unsafe facilities, and to enhance 
        judicial security;
Whereas Ralph Mecham championed innovations that have enhanced court 
        administration by decentralizing financial and management 
        responsibilities, thereby providing more flexibility to district and 
        circuit courts; and
Whereas Ralph Mecham encouraged the development and incorporation into the 
        judicial system of the latest technology, which has resulted in major 
        improvements in court efficiency, presentation of evidence, and access 
        to court records: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) commends Leonidas Ralph Mecham for his steadfast 
        loyalty and unwavering dedication to the judiciary and to the 
        public;
            (2) recognizes Leonidas Ralph Mecham for his more than 20 
        years of outstanding public service to the Federal judiciary 
        and to the Nation; and
            (3) honors Leonidas Ralph Mecham on the occasion of his 
        retirement from the Administrative Office of the United States 
        Courts.
                                 <all>
```
TS-CKHI01

Attachment #7

Pt. 2, Sec. B, 1a

Processing Information on the New Chemical Substance at Industrial Sites

Controlled by Others
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000813040
<NAME> GREYHOUND LINES INC
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           7,778
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   48,597
<ALLOWANCES>                                       328
<INVENTORY>                                      6,952
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               104,229
<PP&E>                                         584,399
<DEPRECIATION>                                 169,763
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 684,450
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          162,523
<BONDS>                                        176,222
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           43,303
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           587
<OTHER-SE>                                     356,457
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   684,450
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               691,468
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  436,954
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              16,961
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (15,955)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (5,683)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (11,055)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  1,607
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (12,662)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of BNP Residential Properties, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, D.
Scott Wilkerson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




   /s/ D. Scott Wilkerson
D. Scott Wilkerson
President and Chief Executive Officer

November 8, 2004


                                       31
<PAGE>