alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
`[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 702 Reported in House (RH)]







                                                 House Calendar No. 148
109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 702

                          [Report No. 109-381]

   Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4167) to amend the 
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to provide for uniform food safety 
       warning notification requirements, and for other purposes.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 1, 2006

   Mr. Gingrey, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION


 
   Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4167) to amend the 
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to provide for uniform food safety 
       warning notification requirements, and for other purposes.

    Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution 
the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XVIII, declare the 
House resolved into the Committee of the Whole House on the state of 
the Union for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4167) to amend the 
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to provide for uniform food safety 
warning notification requirements, and for other purposes. The first 
reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. All points of order 
against consideration of the bill are waived. General debate shall be 
confined to the bill and shall not exceed one hour equally divided and 
controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee 
on Energy and Commerce. After general debate the Committee of the Whole 
shall rise without motion. No further consideration of the bill shall 
be in order except pursuant to a subsequent order of the House.
                                                 House Calendar No. 148

109th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                              H. RES. 702

                          [Report No. 109-381]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

   Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4167) to amend the 
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to provide for uniform food safety 
       warning notification requirements, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             March 1, 2006

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed`
Exhibit 32



                        President's Written Certification
                             Of Financial Statements
                       Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Statute 1350



     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Statute 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 907 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity
as president of 4net Software, Inc. (the "Company") that

     (a)  the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended
          December 31, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section
          13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

     (b)  the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end
          of such period and the results of operations of the Company for such
          period.


Dated:, February 12, 2010


                                            /s/ Steven N. Bronson
                                            ----------------------------------
                                            Steven N. Bronson, President
§ 1134.300 Purposes of REP Article III. REP Article III of the general terms and conditions provides a consolidated source that sets out required reports, notifications, requests, and accountings related to federally owned property and property that is acquired or improved under awards. The article is: ( a ) The original source of requirements for recipients to: ( 1 ) Submit periodic status reports and notifications of critical changes for real property (in paragraphs A.1 and A.2 of the article), which thereby implements OMB guidance in 2 CFR 200.329;
( 2 ) Submit an annual inventory of federally owned property (in paragraph C.1 of the article), which thereby partially implements OMB guidance in 2 CFR 200.312(a);
( 3 ) Provide information on request about copyrighted works and data produced under awards (in paragraph D.2 of the article).
( b ) A secondary source provided for the convenience of recipients and DoD post-award administrators that lists and refers to the original sources of requirements for recipients to: ( 1 ) Request disposition instructions and account at closeout for real property (in paragraphs A.3 and A.4 of the article), the original sources of which are in PROP Article III and OAR Article VI;
( 2 ) Provide notifications of loss, damage, or theft and requests for disposition instructions for equipment (in paragraphs B.2 and B.3 of the article), the original sources of which are in PROP Articles II and IV, respectively;
( 3 ) Account at closeout for equipment and supplies (in paragraph B.4 of the article), the original sources of which are in OAR Article VI and PROP Article IV;
( 4 ) Provide notifications of loss, damage, or theft and requests for disposition instructions for federally owned property (in paragraphs C.2 and C.3 of the article), the original sources of which are in PROP Articles II and V, respectively;
( 5 ) Disclose and report on inventions developed under awards (in paragraph D.1), the original source of which is in PROP Article VI; and
( 6 ) Request disposition instructions for intangible property acquired, but not developed or produced, under awards (in paragraph D.3 of the article), the original source of which is in PROP Article VI.
# EUR-Lex - 31988R4046 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31988R4046

**Council Regulation (ECSC, EEC, Euratom) No 4046/88 of 19 December 1988 adapting the representation and special- duty allowances for the President and Members of the Commission and the President, Judges, Advocates-General and Registrar of the Court of Justice **

*
Official Journal L 356 , 24/12/1988 P. 0002 - 0002 *

COUNCIL REGULATION (ECSC, EEC, EURATOM) No 4046/88 of 19 December 1988 adapting the representation and special-duty allowances for the President and Members of the Commission and the President, Judges, Advocates-General and Registrar of the Court of Justice

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to Council Regulation No 422/67/EEC, No 5/67/Euratom of 25 July 1967 determining the emoluments of the President and Members of the Commission and of the President, Judges, Advocates-General and Registrar of the Court of Justice (1), as last amended by Council Regulation (Euratom, ECSC, EEC) No 3875/87 (2), and in particular Article 4 (4) thereof,

Whereas the representation and special-duty allowances provided for under Article 4 (2) and (3) of Regulation No 422/67/EEC, No 5/67/Euratom should be increased,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1 With effect from 1 July 1988:

(a) the amounts listed in Article 4 (2) of Regulation No 422/67/EEC, No 5/67/Euratom shall be as follows:

- President: Bfrs 49 045, - Vice-President: Bfrs 31 515, - Other Members: Bfrs 21 015;

(b) the amounts listed in the first subparagraph of Article 4 (3) of Regulation No 422/67/EEC, No 5/67/Euratom shall be as follows:

- President: Bfrs 49 045, - Judge or Advocate-General: Bfrs 21 015, - Registrar: Bfrs 19 170;

(c) the amount listed in the second subparagraph of Article 4 (3) of Regulation No 422/67/EEC, No 5/67/Euratom shall be replaced by Bfrs 28 035.

Article 2 This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 19 December 1988.

For the Council The President Th. PANGALOS (1) OJ No 187, 8. 8. 1967, p. 1.

(2) OJ No L 363, 23. 12. 1987, p. 66.
###### Editorial Note on Part 180

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 180 appear at 79 FR 75879, Dec. 19, 2014.

#### § 180.405 May I enter into a covered transaction with a participant if a principal of the transaction is excluded?

As a Federal agency official, you may not enter into a covered transaction with a participant if you know that a principal of the transaction is excluded, unless you obtain an exception under § 180.135.
IV 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 752 

Requesting the President to transmit to the House of Representatives not 

later than 14 days after the date of adoption of this resolution documents 

in the possession of the President relating to the receipt and consideration by the Executive Office of the President of any information concerning the variation between the version of S. 1932, the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005, that the House of Representatives passed on February 

1, 2006, and the version of the bill that the President signed on February 

8, 2006. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 30, 2006 

Mr. WAXMAN (for himself, Mr. LANTOS, Mr. OWENS, Mrs. MALONEY, Mr. 

CUMMINGS, Mr. KUCINICH, Ms. NORTON, Mr. SANDERS, Mr. VAN

HOLLEN, Ms. WATSON, and Mr. CLAY) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Government Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Requesting the President to transmit to the House of Representatives not later than 14 days after the date of 

adoption of this resolution documents in the possession 

of the President relating to the receipt and consideration 

by the Executive Office of the President of any information concerning the variation between the version of S. 

1932, the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005, that the House 

of Representatives passed on February 1, 2006, and 

the version of the bill that the President signed on February 8, 2006. 


rfake on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 752 IH 

1 Resolved, That the President is requested to transmit 

2 to the House of Representatives not later than 14 days 

3 after the date of adoption of this resolution, all documents, 

4 including telephone and electronic mail records, logs and 

5 calendars, and records of internal discussions in the pos6 session of the President relating to the receipt and consid7 eration by the Executive Office of the President of any 

8 information concerning the variation between the version 

9 of S. 1932, the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005, that the 

10 House of Representatives passed on February 1, 2006, 

11 and the version of the bill that the President signed on 

12 February 8, 2006. 

Æ 


rfake on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
IV 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 684 

Supporting the goals of National Manufacturing Week, congratulating manufacturers and their employees for their contributions, growth and innovation, and recognizing the challenges facing the manufacturing sector. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 15, 2006 

Mr. GILLMOR (for himself and Mr. SHIMKUS) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

RESOLUTION 

Supporting the goals of National Manufacturing Week, congratulating manufacturers and their employees for their 

contributions, growth and innovation, and recognizing 

the challenges facing the manufacturing sector. 

Whereas for more than a century, the manufacturing sector 

has been the primary source of economic growth in the 

United States; 

Whereas manufacturing is central to both economic security 

and national security; 

Whereas every dollar in manufactured goods sold generates 

an additional $1.43 in intermediate economic activity, 

which is an output higher than that of any other economic sector; 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC72 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 684 IH 

Whereas manufacturers are responsible for almost 2⁄3 of all 

private-sector research and development conducted in the 

United States, which benefits other manufacturers and 

other industries; 

Whereas manufactured goods make up 62 percent of products exported from the United States, a number that is 

double the percentage of 10 years ago; 

Whereas in the last 20 years, manufacturing productivity has 

increased twice as much as productivity in other economic sectors, enabling American manufacturers to pay 

employees higher wages and at the same time to compete 

in a world market; 

Whereas employees in the manufacturing sector are compensated an average of more than $54,000 annually, the 

highest average compensation level in the private sector; 

Whereas the manufacturing sector has contributed significantly to economic growth and tax receipts at all levels 

of government, paying 1⁄3 of all corporate taxes collected 

by State and local governments; and 

Whereas March 20–23, 2006, has been designated as National Manufacturing Week by the National Association 

of Manufacturers as a week to celebrate the contributions 

of manufacturing to the United States economy: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) supports the goals of National Manufac3 turing Week; 

4 (2) congratulates manufacturers and their em5 ployees for their ongoing contributions to growth 

6 and innovation and for the key role they play in proVerDate Aug 31 2005 12:31 Feb 24, 2006 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\HR684.IH HR684

hsrobinson on PROD1PC72 with BILLS
3 

•HRES 684 IH 

1 moting and ensuring a brighter and stronger future 

2 for the Nation; and 

3 (3) recognizes that the manufacturing sector is 

4 facing serious, new challenges to its international 

5 preeminence which affect prospects for future 

6 growth of the United States economy. 

Æ 


hsrobinson on PROD1PC72 with BILLS
###### Editorial Note on Part 180

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 180 appear at 79 FR 75879, Dec. 19, 2014.

#### § 180.325 What happens if I do business with an excluded person in a covered transaction?

If as a participant you knowingly do business with an excluded person, the Federal agency responsible for your transaction may disallow costs, annul or terminate the transaction, issue a stop work order, debar or suspend you, or take other remedies as appropriate.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. James Hardison, Appellant.

Judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered March 14, *1969*on resentence, affirmed. No opinion. Appeal from judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered February 7,1969, dismissed as academic. This judgment was superseded by the judgment rendered March 14, 1969. Christ, P. J., Rabin, Hopkins, Munder and Martuscello, JJ., concur.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

 NORTHERN DIVISION

______________________________

JOHN GREER, #87837 *

Plaintiff, *

 v. * 2:06-CV-783-ID

 

SHERIFF D.T. MARSHALL, et al., *

Defendants. * 

 ______________________________

ORDER

Plaintiff filed this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action on August 31, 2006. On September 11,

2006 the court entered an order of procedure which informed Plaintiff, among other things,

that if moved to a different institution or was released, he must immediately inform the court

and Defendants of his new address. It has come to the court’s attention that Plaintiff is no

longer at the most recent address he provided to the court. This case cannot proceed if

Plaintiff’s whereabouts remain unknown to this court. 

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that:

1. On or before December 11, 2006 Plaintiff shall SHOW CAUSE why this case

should not be dismissed for his failure to comply with the orders of this court and his failure

to adequately prosecute this action;

2 The Clerk SEND of a copy of this order to Plaintiff at his last known mailing

address. Plaintiff is specifically cautioned that if he fails to respond to this order the

Magistrate Judge will recommend that this case be dismissed. 

Case 2:06-cv-00783-ID-SRW Document 16 Filed 11/29/2006 Page 1 of 2
2

DONE, this 29th day of November 2006.

 /s/Susan Russ Walker 

SUSAN RUSS WALKER

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00783-ID-SRW Document 16 Filed 11/29/2006 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                   5
<MULTIPLIER>                1000         
<CURRENCY>                                    U.S. DOLLARS         
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                        3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-28-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 DEC-30-1996         
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                          1   
<CASH>                                              93,774   
<SECURITIES>                                        16,735   
<RECEIVABLES>                                       72,570   
<ALLOWANCES>                                         3,018   
<INVENTORY>                                         61,632   
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   281,029   
<PP&E>                                             999,922   
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (317,296)   
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,007,659   
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               84,743   
<BONDS>                                            145,000   
<COMMON>                                               519   
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0   
<PREFERRED>                                              0   
<OTHER-SE>                                         715,630   
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1,007,659   
<SALES>                                            167,242   
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   167,242   
<CGS>                                              127,927   
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      127,927   
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    12,757   
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     1,034   
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   1,467   
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     17,562   
<INCOME-TAX>                                         2,986   
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 17,799   
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0   
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0   
<CHANGES>                                                0   
<NET-INCOME>                                        17,799   
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         0.33   
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0.33   
        

</TABLE>
#### GILLETT, Respondent, v. GILLETT, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

July 1, 1914.)

Action by Louisa Gillett against G. Byron Gilett.

No opinion. Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs.
###### Editorial Note on Part 72

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 72 appear at 80 FR 74981, Dec. 1, 2015, and at 81 FR 86910, Dec. 2, 2016.

#### § 72.210 General license issued.

A general license is hereby issued for the storage of spent fuel in an independent spent fuel storage installation at power reactor sites to persons authorized to possess or operate nuclear power reactors under 10 CFR part 50 or 10 CFR part 52.

[72 FR 49561, Aug. 28, 2007]
New York State Department of Environmental Conservation

Division of Air Resources

625 Broadway, Albany, New York 12233-3250

Phone: (518) 402-8452 • Fax: (518) 402-9035

Website: www.dec.ny.gov

~

~

JAN 272015

Joe Martens

Commissioner

Mr. John Filippelli

Director, Clean Air and Sustainability Division

United States Environmental Protection Agency - Region 2

290 Broadway

New York, NY 10007-1866

Section 111(d)/129 State Plan for

Implementation of Emission Guidelines and Compliance Times

For Existing Sewage Sludge Incineration Units

. (Title 40 Part 60 Subpart MMMM)

llippelli~ krr/"

Your staffhas advised us that in an April 18, 2014 opinion, the U.S. Court of Appeals for

the District of Columbia Circuit upheld the United States Environmental Protection Agency's

(EPA) emission standards for its Portland cement MACT rule, but vacated the rule's affirmative

defense provision for violations that result from malfunctions, as applied to civil penalties

assessed in citizen suits. Natural Resources Defense Council v. Environmental Protection

Agency, No. 749F3dl055 (D.C. Cir. April 18, 2014).

The vacated affirmative defense provision in EPA's Portland cement rule is identical to

the affirmative defense provision in EPA's SSI Guidelines (Subpart MMMM) which was

incorporated by reference into New York State regulation and included as part of New York's

State Plan for Existing Sewage Sludge Incineration Units (State Plan for SSI).

Because of the U.S. Court of Appeals' decision, New York is withdrawing its request for

EPA approval of the affirmative defense provisions as part of its State Plan for SSI, submitted to

EPA for approval on July 1,2013.

If you have any questions regarding this request, please contact me at (518) 402-8452 or

have your staff contact Mr. Robert Stanton, Director, Bureau of Stationary Sources at (518) 402-

8403.

a.~

David J. Shaw

Director, Division of Air Resources

c: Richard Ruvo, Chief, Air Programs Branch, US EPA Region 2