alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION

Required by Rule 13a-14(a)

I, Reginald M. Fountain, Jr., certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Fountain Powerboat Industries, Inc.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a 15(e) and 15d 15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a.

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b.

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c.

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a.

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b.

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date: May 15, 2008



| |    |                             
| | -- | ----------------------------
| | By | /s/REGINALD M. Fountain, JR.
| |    | Chief Executive Officer
**Exhibit 31.1**
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Stephen E. Gorman, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Greyhound Lines,Inc. and Subsidiaries; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand have:
 a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, asof the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s boardof directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reporting whichare reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.
Date: November 15, 2004                                                               /s/ Stephen E. Gorman   Stephen E. Gorman, President and Chief   Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1996
<CASH>                                         168,039
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             701
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    356,211
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         470,679
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           475,328
<LOANS>                                      1,730,679
<ALLOWANCE>                                     41,039
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,076,518
<DEPOSITS>                                   1,737,228
<SHORT-TERM>                                   341,046
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            385,698
<LONG-TERM>                                    284,496
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        24,602
<OTHER-SE>                                     279,685
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               3,076,518
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 41,660
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               15,991
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 1,430
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                59,081
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              25,117
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              36,224
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           22,857
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    5,600
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             (1,974)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 39,897
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 19,644
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       9,848
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     9,848
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .38<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .38
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.20
<LOANS-NON>                                     27,162
<LOANS-PAST>                                       704
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                39,260
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    5,326
<RECOVERIES>                                     1,505
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               41,039
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            41,039
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
<FN>
<F1>FOR PURPOSES OF THIS EXHIBIT, PRIMARY MEANS BASIC.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
| **Scientific Investigations Map          2837** |
|-------------------------------------------------|

| Surficial geologic map of the Germantown quadrangle, Shelby County, Tennessee |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

By Roy Van Arsdale**Version 1.0**The text of this report is presented here in Portable Document Format.      The latest version of Adobe Acrobat Reader® or similar software is      required to view it. If you wish to download the latest version of Acrobat      Reader® free of charge, click here. SIM 2837 PDF        file (2.13 MB)For printing and viewing
Text Only PDF file (25 KB)
(This version of the report is accessible as defined in Section 508.)Readme TXT file (2        KB) SIM 2837 MET file (14 KB)Metadata file
 
2837.zip (294 KB)ZIPPED archive of ArcInfo and ArcView files2837.tar.gz (296 KB)TARRED and GZIPPED archive of ArcInfo and ArcView filesbases.zip (1.84 MB)ZIPPED archive of base maps imagesbases.tar.gz (1.83 MB)TARRED and GZIPPED archive of base maps imagesAccessibilityFOIAPrivacyPolicies and Notices
U.S. Department of the Interior | U.S. Geological Survey      URL: https://pubsdata.usgs.gov/pubs/sim/2004/2837/Questions or Assistance: USGS Web ContactPage Last Modified: Thr Dec  1 17:04 EDT 2016
#### Bell *v.*Bell.

*Contest on Claim of Homestead by Widow and Minor Children.*

1. *Homestead; right of widow and children; disposition of property by will.*— The right of the widow and minor children to the exemption of the homestead under § 2543, Code of 1886, providing for the exemption from administration of the homestead of any resident of the State, is not barred by the attempted disposition of the property by the decedent in his will.

Appeal from Cleburne Probate Court.

Heard before Hon. Bartlett Owen.

Aiken & Burton, for appellant.

Kelly *&*Smith, *contra.*

SOMEEYILLE, J.

In *Hubbard v.*Russell, 73 Ala. 578, it was decided that where a decedent leaves a will by which he disposes of his entire property, providing for the widow by making her a devisee under the terms of the instrument, *65slie could claim her exemptions of personal property provided for by statute without being first required to dissent from the will. In that case, the testator had directed the property, real and personal, to be sold, giving the widow, during her life or widowhood, one half interest in the net proceeds, to be retained in trust by the executor for her use, with remainder to the testator’s lawful heirs. The same principle, in our opinion, applies to the claim of exemption by the widow to the homestead owned and occupied by the decedent at the time of his death. The homestead declared to be exempt is not that of one dying intestate, but the homestead of “any resident” of this State — thus including decedents both testate and intestate. It is not only exempted from the payment of debts contracted since the 23d of April, 1873, but is declared expressly to be “exempted from administration.” The effect of the statute is to take the homestead out of the operation of the will, during the life of the widow and minority of the child or children, for the purpose and. to the extent declared in the statute. — Code, 1886, §§2543, 2507; *Jarrell v. Payne,*75 Ala. 577; *Coffee v. Joseph,*74 Ala. 271.

The attempted disposition of the property, therefore, by the testator in his will can not bar the widow and minor children of the statutory right of exemption. There is no room for the operation of an equitable estoppel in such a case, at least in the Probate or Circuit Court, where issues arising out of the contest relating to homestead rights are authorized to be tried.

Whether a testator could lawfully provide a legacy, or devise, which should vest only on condition of a waiver of all exemption rights, in any mode, is a question not now before us for decision.

The judgment of the Probate Court, in view of these principles, is free from error, and must be affirmed.
Exhibit 10.1
                                                                    ------------

                Summary of Compensation to Non-Employee Directors
                -------------------------------------------------


         On July 25, 2006, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors
(the "Board") of Cheniere Energy, Inc. (the "Company") approved the payment of
$100,000 to each non-employee director of the Company as compensation for
services for the period from the current year's annual meeting of Stockholders
(May 23, 2006) until the next year's annual meeting of Stockholders (the "Annual
Period"). An additional payment of $20,000 was approved for the chairman of the
Audit Committee and the chairman of the Compensation Committee for the Annual
Period. The payment shall be made, at the election of the director, either 100%
in shares of the Company's restricted stock, 100% in cash or 50% in cash and 50%
in shares of restricted stock. Cash payments shall be made quarterly as of the
last business day of July, October, January and April, beginning on July 31,
2006. Shares of restricted stock will be issued in December 2006. The number of
restricted shares to be issued will be determined based on a 25% discount to the
closing price of the Company's common stock as reported on the American Stock
Exchange on the date of the Company's December 2006 Board meeting or the last
business day of the calendar year, if there is no December Board meeting (the
"Date of Grant"). Vesting will occur for one-third of the restricted shares on
each anniversary of the Date of Grant beginning on the first anniversary of the
Date of Grant.
##### 



Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) UNDER THE EXCHANGE ACT
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of B.H.I.T. Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant is made known to us by others, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Date: August 10, 2005
    By:
    /s/ James Benenson, Jr.James Benenson, Jr.President and Chief Executive Officer
#### § 71.81 Applicability of operating controls and procedures.

A licensee subject to this part, who, under a general or specific license, transports licensed material or delivers licensed material to a carrier for transport, shall comply with the requirements of this subpart G, with the quality assurance requirements of subpart H of this part, and with the general provisions of subpart A of this part.
#### The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v. Carl Wess, Respondent.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated October 13, 1967, which granted defendant’s motion to dismiss the indictment. Order reversed, on the law, and motion denied. No questions of fact were considered. The evidence before the Grand Jury, if believed, states a prima facie case to support the indictment and, therefore, the dismissal of the indictment was erroneous. Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan and Hopkins, JJ., concur; Rabin and Kleinfeld, JJ., dissent and vote to affirm the order.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 766 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 766

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                         April 6, 2006.
    Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker 
may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XVIII, declare the House resolved into the 
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of the 
concurrent resolution (H. Con. Res. 376) establishing the congressional budget 
for the United States Government for fiscal year 2007 and setting forth 
appropriate budgetary levels for fiscal years 2008 through 2011. The first 
reading of the concurrent resolution shall be dispensed with. All points of 
order against consideration of the concurrent resolution are waived. General 
debate shall not exceed four hours, with three hours of general debate confined 
to the congressional budget equally divided and controlled by the chairman and 
ranking minority member of the Committee on the Budget and one hour of general 
debate on the subject of economic goals and policies equally divided and 
controlled by Representative Saxton of New Jersey and Representative Maloney of 
New York or their designees. After general debate the Committee of the Whole 
shall rise without motion. No further consideration of the concurrent resolution 
shall be in order except pursuant to a subsequent order of the House.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Marie C. Behuniak, Appellant. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.

[815 NYS2d 782]

*1259Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed July 1, 2005, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.

Claimant worked as a teacher for a Catholic school for nearly 35 years. On July 9, 2004, the employer offered her a contract of employment for the 2004-2005 academic year which contained an addendum with specified conditions. Claimant became upset with the conditions, left a voice message declining the offer and did not sign the contract. The employer treated claimant’s actions as a resignation. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause. Claimant appeals.

Initially, we note that general dissatisfaction with the conditions of employment does not constitute good cause for leaving a job *(see Matter of Enneddam [Commissioner of Labor],*20 AD3d 800, 801 [2005]). In the case at hand, it is apparent that the employer had experienced problems with claimant and that she was unhappy with the terms of the addendum, which were designed to address such problems, and she did not sign the contract. While claimant’s testimony that she was terminated from her position is in conflict with that of the employer’s representative that she effectively resigned, this presented a credibility issue for the Board to resolve *(see Matter of Peake [Commissioner of Labor],*8 AD3d 743, 744 [2004]). Therefore, we find no reason to disturb the Board’s decision.

Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Spain, Lahtinen and Kane, JJ, concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
IV 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 491 

A resolution affirming and recognizing the Khmer, Laotian, Hmong, and 

the other ethnic groups commonly referred to as Montagnards of Cambodia and Laos who supported and defended the United States Armed 

Forces and freedom in Southeast Asia. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 28, 2017 

Mr. DUFFY (for himself, Mr. GROTHMAN, and Mr. PERLMUTTER) submitted 

the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign 

Affairs 

RESOLUTION 

A resolution affirming and recognizing the Khmer, Laotian, 

Hmong, and the other ethnic groups commonly referred 

to as Montagnards of Cambodia and Laos who supported 

and defended the United States Armed Forces and freedom in Southeast Asia. 

Whereas many Khmer, Laotian, Hmong, and Montagnards— 

(1) fought and died with the United States Armed 

Forces during the conflict in Southeast Asia; 

(2) rescued United States pilots shot down in 

enemy-controlled territory and returned the pilots to safety; 


srobinson on DSKBC5CHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 491 IH 

(3) captured and destroyed enemy supplies and prevented enemy forces from using the supplies to kill members of the United States Armed Forces; 

(4) gathered and provided to the United States 

Armed Forces intelligence about enemy troop positions, 

movement, and strength; and 

(5) provided food, shelter, and support to the United 

States Armed Forces; and 

Whereas the National Armed Forces of Cambodia facilitated 

the evacuation of the United States Embassy in Phnom 

Penh on April 12, 1975, by continuing to fight Khmer 

Rouge forces as they advanced upon the capital: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives affirms 

2 and recognizes these Khmer, Laotian, Hmong, and 

3 Montagnard people of Cambodia and Laos for their sup4 port and defense of the United States Armed Forces and 

5 freedom in Southeast Asia. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSKBC5CHB2PROD with BILLS