alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 7.7 Termination, renewal, and rechartering of advisory committees. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b)(1) of this section, each NRC advisory committee shall terminate two years after it is established, reestablished, or renewed, unless— ( 1 ) It has been terminated sooner;
( 2 ) It has been renewed or reestablished before the end of such period in accordance with the procedures set forth in paragraph (b) of this section; or
( 3 ) Its duration has been otherwise designated by law. The NRC Committee Management Officer shall notify the Committee Management Secretariat of the effective date of termination of any advisory committee that has been terminated by the NRC.
( b ) ( 1 ) An NRC advisory committee that is established by statute shall require rechartering by the filing of a new charter every 2 years after the date of enactment of the statute establishing the committee. If a new charter is not filed, the committee is not terminated, but it may not meet or take any actions.
( 2 ) Any other NRC advisory committee may be renewed, provided that such renewal is carried out in compliance with the procedures set forth in § 7.5, except that an advisory committee established by the President may be renewed by appropriate action of the President and the filing of a new charter. Renewal of an NRC advisory committee shall not be deemed to terminate the appointment of any committee member who was previously appointed to serve on the committee.
[54 FR 26948, June 27, 1989, as amended at 67 FR 79840, Dec. 31, 2002]
§ 820.64 Terms and conditions. An exemption may contain appropriate terms and conditions including, but not limited to, provisions that : ( a ) Limit its duration;
( b ) Require alternative action;
( c ) Require partial compliance; or
( d ) Establish a schedule for full or partial compliance.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>     5
<LEGEND>  THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
          EXTRACTED FROM THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF
          AND FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED OCTOBER 31, 1999 AS REPORTED
          ON FORM 10-K AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
          TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                            YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        OCT-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                           NOV-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                             OCT-31-1999
<CASH>                                            479
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  18,426
<ALLOWANCES>                                      400
<INVENTORY>                                    20,080
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               41,836
<PP&E>                                          6,616
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (3,007)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 50,813
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          31,649
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                           52
<OTHER-SE>                                     17,403
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   50,813
<SALES>                                       124,974
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              124,974
<CGS>                                          97,302
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  97,302
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               22,449
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (678)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 4,560
<INCOME-TAX>                                    1,885
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             2,675
<DISCONTINUED>                                      0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                    2,675
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0.52
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0.52


</TABLE>
```

[House Report 108-602]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

108th Congress                                                   Report
                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
 2d Session                                                     108-602

======================================================================

 
PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF H.R. 4759, UNITED STATES-AUSTRALIA FREE 
                   TRADE AGREEMENT IMPLEMENTATION ACT

                                _______
                                

   July 13, 2004.--Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

                                _______
                                

    Mr. Dreier, from the Committee on Rules, submitted the following

                              R E P O R T

                       [To accompany H. Res. 712]

    The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration 
House Resolution 712, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to 
the House with the recommendation that the resolution be 
adopted.

                SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

    The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 4759, the 
United States-Australia Free Trade Agreement Implementation 
Act, under a closed rule. The rule provides two hours of debate 
in the House equally divided and controlled by the chairman and 
ranking minority member of the Committee on Ways and Means.
    The rule waives all points of order against consideration 
of the bill. The resolution provides that pursuant to section 
151(f)(2) of the Trade Act of 1974, the previous question shall 
be considered as ordered on the bill to final passage without 
intervening motion.
    Finally, section 2 of the resolution provides that during 
consideration of the bill, notwithstanding the operation of the 
previous question, the Chair may postpone further consideration 
of the bill to a time designated by the Speaker.
    The waiver of all points of order against consideration of 
the bill includes a waiver of clause 4(a) of rule XIII 
(requiring a three-day layover of the committee report), 
because the Committee on Ways and Means did not file its report 
(H. Rept. 108-597) until Monday, July 12, 2004, and the bill 
may be considered by the House as early as Wednesday, July 14.

                                  

```
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, April 26, 2021. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, April 26, 2021 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A21I0168. SELECT SPECIALTY HOSPITAL - MIDTOWN ATLANTA, LLC v. ABIEGALE ROGERS, AS ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF SONNY ROGERS, DECEASED.
Upon consideration of the Application for Interlocutory Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: 18C08479
#### The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v. Tyde Moss, Respondent.

Appeal by the People from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated November 19, 1969 (erroneously referred to in the notice of appeal by the date of February 18, 1969), which, after a hearing, granted defendant’s motion to suppress certain evidence and to dismiss the indictment. Order reversed, on the law and the facts, and defendant’s motion denied. In our opinion, although the search warrant authorized the seizure of narcotics, and nothing else, and although only a small and unindietable quantity of narcotics was unearthed on the officers’ search in pursuance of the authority granted to them by the search warrant, nevertheless, their simultaneous discovery of weapons which constituted contraband, the mere possession of which was a crime, served as a legal predicate for defendant’s arrest and the use of the contraband as evidence against him *(Harris*v. *United States,*331 U. S. 145; 154; *Abel*v. *United States,*362 U. S. 217, 235, 237, 238; *Sibron*v. *New York,*392 U. S. 40, 77 [concurring opinion by Mr. Justice Harlan] ). An officer, armed with a warrant, is not restricted to seizing only those items listed in the warrant, but also may seize unlisted items which constitute instrumentalities of crime *(People*v. *Hendricks,*45 Misc 2d 7, 11-12; *People*v. *Reinhardt,*42 Misc 2d 45, 50-51). Christ, P. J., Rabin, Hopkins, Munder and Martuscello, JJ., concur.
Amended Schedule to the Form of Amended and Restated Indemnification Agreement



 Exhibit 10.2 
 Amended Schedule to the Form of 
 Amended and Restated Indemnification Agreement 
 The Indemnification Agreements between Sunoco, Inc. and the directors, executive officers, trustees, fiduciaries, employees or agents named below are identical in all
material respects. 
  

			
	 Employee
	  	 Date of Agreement

	Michael J. Colavita	  	September 2, 2004
	John F. Carroll	  	March 4, 2004
	Terence P. Delaney	  	March 4, 2004
	Michael H. R. Dingus	  	March 4, 2004
	John G. Drosdick	  	March 4, 2004
	Bruce G. Fischer	  	March 4, 2004
	Michael J. Hennigan	  	February 2, 2006
	Thomas W. Hofmann	  	March 4, 2004
	Vincent J. Kelley	  	February 2, 2006
	Joseph P. Krott	  	March 4, 2004
	Michael S. Kuritzkes	  	March 4, 2004
	Joel H. Maness	  	March 4, 2004
	Michael J. McGoldrick	  	March 4, 2004
	Ann C. Mulé	  	March 4, 2004
	Paul A. Mulholland	  	March 4, 2004
	Rolf D. Naku	  	March 4, 2004
	Marie A. Natoli	  	March 3, 2006
	Robert W. Owens	  	March 4, 2004
	Alan J. Rothman	  	March 4, 2004
	Charles K. Valutas	  	March 4, 2004
		
	 Director
	  	 Date of Agreement

	Robert J. Darnall	  	March 4, 2004
	Ursula O. Fairbairn	  	March 4, 2004
	Thomas P. Gerrity	  	March 4, 2004
	Rosemarie B. Greco	  	March 4, 2004
	James G. Kaiser	  	March 4, 2004
	R. Anderson Pew	  	March 4, 2004
	G. Jackson Ratcliffe	  	March 4, 2004
	John W. Rowe	  	March 4, 2004
	John K. Wulff	  	March 8, 2004
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended
March 31, 2009 (the “Report”) of Patient Safety Technologies, Inc. (the
“Registrant”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof, I, Mary A. Lay, as the Interim Chief Financial Officer of the
Registrant, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge,
that:





(1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.





Dated:
      May 20, 2009
                By:
                /s/
      Mary A. LayMary
      A. LayInterim
      Chief Financial Officer





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 954 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 954

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
     To remove the use restrictions on certain land transferred to 
          Rockingham County, Virginia, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REMOVAL OF USE RESTRICTION.

    Public Law 101-479 (104 Stat. 1158) is amended--
            (1) by striking section 2(d); and
            (2) by adding the following new section at the end:

``SEC. 4. REMOVAL OF USE RESTRICTION.

    ``(a) The approximately 1-acre portion of the land referred to in 
section 3 that is used for purposes of a child care center, as 
authorized by this Act, shall not be subject to the use restriction 
imposed in the deed referred to in section 3.
    ``(b) Upon enactment of this section, the Secretary of the Interior 
shall execute an instrument to carry out subsection (a).''.

            Passed the House of Representatives July 11, 2017.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
115th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 954

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

     To remove the use restrictions on certain land transferred to 
          Rockingham County, Virginia, and for other purposes.
```
#### § 601.30 What policies and procedures must I follow?

The DOS policies and procedures that you must follow are the policies and procedures specified in each applicable section of the OMB guidance in subparts A through I of 2 CFR part 180 and any supplemental policies and procedures set forth in this part.
§ 200.466 Scholarships and student aid costs. ( a ) Costs of scholarships, fellowships, and other programs of student aid at IHEs are allowable only when the purpose of the Federal award is to provide training to selected participants and the charge is approved by the Federal awarding agency. However, tuition remission and other forms of compensation paid as, or in lieu of, wages to students performing necessary work are allowable provided that: ( 1 ) The individual is conducting activities necessary to the Federal award;
( 2 ) Tuition remission and other support are provided in accordance with established policy of the IHE and consistently provided in a like manner to students in return for similar activities conducted under Federal awards as well as other activities; and
( 3 ) During the academic period, the student is enrolled in an advanced degree program at a non-Federal entity or affiliated institution and the activities of the student in relation to the Federal award are related to the degree program;
( 4 ) The tuition or other payments are reasonable compensation for the work performed and are conditioned explicitly upon the performance of necessary work; and
( 5 ) It is the IHE's practice to similarly compensate students under Federal awards as well as other activities.
( b ) Charges for tuition remission and other forms of compensation paid to students as, or in lieu of, salaries and wages must be subject to the reporting requirements in § 200.430, and must be treated as direct or indirect cost in accordance with the actual work being performed. Tuition remission may be charged on an average rate basis. See also § 200.431.
[78 FR 78608, Dec. 26, 2013, as amended at 85 FR 49569, Aug. 13, 2020]
EX-35.4
(logo) WELLS FARGO

Corporate Trust Services

MAC R1204-010
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045

Tel: 410 884 2000
Fax: 410 715 2380


Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc.
1585 Broadway
New York, New York 10036

RE: Annual Statement of Compliance for Morgan Stanley Bank of America Merrill
    Lynch Trust 2013-C9, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates
    Series 2013-C9

Per the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of May 1, 2013 (the
"Agreement"), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank,
N.A., as Custodian ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows as of and for
the year ending December 31, 2013 (the "Reporting Period"):

(a) A review of Wells Fargo's activities during the Reporting Period and of its
    performance under the Agreement has been made under such officer's
    supervision; and

(b) To the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo
    has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material
    respects throughout the Reporting Period.

February 14, 2014


/s/ Gail Vannest
GAIL VANNEST
Vice President


Wells Fargo Bank, N.A
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 731 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 731

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                         June 20, 2006.
Whereas in 2005, a small group of American Legion Riders in Kansas calling 
        themselves the ``Patriot Guard'' began a movement to shield the families 
        and friends of fallen service members from interruptions by protesters 
        appearing at military funerals;
Whereas individuals from Colorado, Oklahoma, and Texas later brought together 
        diverse groups of motorcycle organizations across the country who rode 
        to honor fallen service members, forming an organization known as the 
        ``Patriot Guard Riders'';
Whereas the Patriot Guard Riders have since grown into a nationwide network, 
        including both veterans and nonveterans and riders and nonriders, and is 
        open to anyone who shares a respect for service members who have made 
        the ultimate sacrifice for the Nation;
Whereas Patriot Guard Riders attend military funerals to show respect for fallen 
        service members and to shield mourning family members and friends of the 
        deceased from protestors who interrupt, or threaten to interrupt, the 
        dignity of the event;
Whereas across the Nation, Patriot Guard Riders volunteer their time to come to 
        the aid of military families in need, so to allow the memories of the 
        deceased service member to be remembered with honor and dignity;
Whereas regardless of one's opinion of the Nation's military commitments, the 
        families, friends, and communities of the Nation's fallen soldiers 
        deserve a peaceful time of mourning and should not be harassed and 
        caused further suffering at a funeral;
Whereas Patriot Guard Riders appear at a funeral only at the invitation of the 
        fallen soldier's family and participate in a nonviolent, legal manner; 
        and
Whereas the members of the Nation's Armed Forces willingly risk their lives to 
        protect the American way of life and the freedoms guaranteed by the 
        Constitution: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives expresses its deepest 
appreciation to the Patriot Guard Riders who--
            (1) attend military funerals across the country to show respect for 
        fallen members of the Armed Forces and, when needed, shield mourning 
        family members and friends of the deceased from protestors who 
        interrupt, or threaten to interrupt, the dignity of a funeral; and
            (2) in so doing, help to preserve the memory and honor of the 
        Nation's fallen heroes.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
#### § 60.1 Purpose and scope.

This part prescribes rules governing the licensing (including issuance of a construction authorization) of the U.S. Department of Energy to receive and possess source, special nuclear, and byproduct material at a geologic repository operations area sited, constructed, or operated in accordance with the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982, as amended. This part does not apply to any activity licensed under another part of this chapter. This part does not apply to the licensing of the U.S. Department of Energy to receive and possess source, special nuclear, and byproduct material at a geologic repository operations area sited, constructed, or operated at Yucca Mountain, Nevada, in accordance with the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1992, as amended, and the Energy Policy Act of 1992, subject to part 63 of this chapter. This part also gives notice to all persons who knowingly provide to any licensee, applicant, contractor, or subcontractor, components, equipment, materials, or other goods or services, that relate to a licensee's or applicant's activities subject to this part, that they may be individually subject to NRC enforcement action for violation of § 60.11.

[69 FR 2279, Jan. 14, 2004]
#### § 417.650 May an administrative agreement be the result of a settlement?

Yes, a Federal agency may enter into an administrative agreement with you as part of the settlement of a debarment or suspension action.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 927 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 927

 To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for the eligibility 
   for beneficiary travel for veterans seeking treatment or care for 
    military sexual trauma in specialized outpatient or residential 
 programs at facilities of the Department of Veterans Affairs, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 7, 2017

Mrs. Walorski (for herself and Ms. Kuster of New Hampshire) introduced 
 the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans' 
                                Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for the eligibility 
   for beneficiary travel for veterans seeking treatment or care for 
    military sexual trauma in specialized outpatient or residential 
 programs at facilities of the Department of Veterans Affairs, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. BENEFICIARY TRAVEL FOR VETERANS SEEKING TREATMENT OR CARE 
              FOR MILITARY SEXUAL TRAUMA IN SPECIALIZED OUTPATIENT OR 
              RESIDENTIAL PROGRAMS OF THE DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS 
              AFFAIRS.

    (a) Eligibility.--Section 111 of title 38, United States Code, is 
amended--
            (1) in subsection (b)(1), by adding at the end the 
        following subparagraph:
            ``(H) A veteran whose travel to a specialized outpatient or 
        residential program at a Department facility is in connection 
        with treatment or care for military sexual trauma.''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(h) In this section:
            ``(1) The term `military sexual trauma' means psychological 
        trauma, which in the judgment of a Department mental health 
        professional, resulted from a physical assault of a sexual 
        nature, battery of a sexual nature, or sexual harassment which 
        occurred while the veteran was serving on active duty or active 
        duty for training.
            ``(2) The term `sexual harassment' means repeated, 
        unsolicited verbal or physical contact of a sexual nature which 
        is threatening in character.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall 
apply with respect to travel occurring after the date of the enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```