alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 835.704 Administrative records. ( a ) Training records shall be maintained, as necessary, to demonstrate compliance with §§ 835.901.
( b ) Actions taken to maintain occupational exposures as low as reasonably achievable, including the actions required for this purpose by § 835.101, as well as facility design and control actions required by §§ 835.1001, 835.1002, and 835.1003, shall be documented.
( c ) Records shall be maintained to document the results of internal audits and other reviews of program content and implementation.
( d ) Written declarations of pregnancy, including the estimated date of conception, and revocations of declarations of pregnancy shall be maintained.
( e ) Changes in equipment, techniques, and procedures used for monitoring shall be documented.
( f ) Records shall be maintained as necessary to demonstrate compliance with the requirements of §§ 835.1201 and 835.1202 for sealed radioactive source control, inventory, and source leak tests.
[58 FR 65485, Dec. 14, 1993, as amended at 63 FR 59685, Nov. 4, 1998]
EXHIBIT 31.1





CERTIFICATIONS





I, Emil H. Soika, President and Chief Executive Officer of Criticare Systems, Inc., certify that:





1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Criticare Systems, Inc.;





2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;




4.  The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:





(a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;





(b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and





(c)  disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and





5.  The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





(a)  all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and








(b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.





Date: May 11, 2004





/s/ Emil H. Soika


Emil H. Soika


President and Chief Executive Officer
##### 



Exhibit 31.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Robert J. Terrano, certify that:  1.
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Del Taco Income Properties IV;2.
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  a)
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andc)
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and  5.
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function):  a)
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting. Date: May 13, 2005
    
    /s/ Robert J. TerranoRobert J. TerranoExecutive Vice President,Chief Financial Officer
NOTE: The docket for today's action contains key portions of the 2007 Ozone Plan. The entire plan and 

appendices are available at: http://www.valleyair.org/Air_Quality_Plans/AQ_Final_Adopted_Ozone2007.htm
San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District 

1990 E. Gettysburg Avenue 

Fresno, California 93726 

(559) 230-5800 

www.valleyair.org

San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District 

1990 E. Gettysburg Avenue 

Fresno, California 93726 

(559) 230-5800 

www.valleyair.org

San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District 

1990 E. Gettysburg Avenue 

Fresno, California 93726 

(559) 230-5800 

www.valleyair.org
EXHIBIT 35.1

VW Credit, Inc. Servicer Compliance Statement Under Section 3.9 of the Sale and Servicing

Agreement and Item 1123 of Regulation AB





VOLKSWAGEN AUTO
LOAN ENHANCED TRUST 2013-1

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of VW Credit, Inc. (VCI), as Servicer under the Sale and Servicing
Agreement dated as of February 27, 2013 (as amended and supplemented, or otherwise modified and in effect from time to time, the Sale and Servicing Agreement), by and among Volkswagen Auto Loan Enhanced Trust 2013-1, as Issuer,
Volkswagen Auto Lease/Loan Underwritten Funding, LLC as Seller, VW Credit, Inc., as Servicer, and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Indenture Trustee, does hereby certify that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period from February 27, 2013 through December 31, 2013, and of its performance under the Sale and Servicing Agreement was conducted under my supervision.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Sale and Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout such period.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate on behalf of the Servicer this twenty-eighth day of March, 2014.



/s/ Dr. Christian DahlheimDr. Christian DahlheimExecutive Vice President & CFO
#### ADZERYEHA, Respondent, v. HOLBROOK, CABOT & ROLLINS CO., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

December 24, 1914.)

Action by Anisim Adzeryeha against the Holbrook, Cabot & Rollins Company. B. Patterson, of New York City, for appellant. F. X. Wazeter, of New York City, for respondent.

No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Order filed.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without **

oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

LA/Research

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

J. REFUGIO CEJA-RIVERA, aka Jose

Rivera,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 07-71782

Agency No. A072-294-331

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted November 17, 2009** 

Before: ALARCÓN, TROTT, and TASHIMA, Circuit Judges.

Jose Refugio Ceja-Rivera, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an

immigration judge’s decision finding him ineligible to adjust status due to his

FILED

DEC 07 2009

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
LA/Research 2 07-71782

controlled substance offenses. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. 

Reviewing de novo the agency’s legal determination, see Aguiluz-Arellano v.

Gonzales, 446 F.3d 980, 983 (9th Cir. 2006), we deny the petition for review.

We deny as moot Ceja-Rivera’s request to hold this case in abeyance for

proceedings in de Jesus Melendez v. Gonzales, 503 F.3d 1019 (9th Cir. 2007),

r’hearing denied.

We agree with the agency’s conclusion that Ceja Rivera’s second controlled

substance offense is not amenable to treatment under the Federal First Offenders

Act, 18 U.S.C. §3607. See id. at 1025-27. Ceja-Rivera’s contention that his

second offense does not constitute a conviction for immigration purposes is not

persuasive. See id.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
**Exhibit 32.2**
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Calgon Carbon Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Leroy M. Ball, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company for the periods presented therein.

/s/ Leroy M.   Ball

 

 

 

 

Chief   Financial Officer

 

 

August 9,   2006

 

 

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                       1,117,545
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,091,422
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (167,000)
<INVENTORY>                                  1,198,005
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,346,552
<PP&E>                                       1,441,783
<DEPRECIATION>                              (1,065,443)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,452,814
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,084,782
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       510,237
<OTHER-SE>                                     990,906
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 6,452,814
<SALES>                                      1,733,154
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,733,154
<CGS>                                          876,011
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  923,695
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                            (112,976)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (66,552)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (66,552)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.17)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.17)


</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
                                                                  EXHIBIT 10.39

                           AMENDMENT TO LOAN DOCUMENTS



Borrower:         Digital Microwave Corporation
Address:          170 Rose Orchard Way
                  San Jose, California

Date:             As of June 25, 1996


         THIS AMENDMENT TO LOAN DOCUMENTS is entered into between Coast Business
Credit, a division of Southern Pacific Thrift & Loan Association (successor by
merger to CoastFed Business Credit Corporation) ("Coast"), whose address is
12121 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 1111, Los Angeles, California and the borrower named
above (the "Borrower").

         The Parties agree to amend the Amended and Restated Accounts and
Inventory Collateral Security Agreement between them, dated June 25, 1996 (the
"Accounts Agreement"), as follows. (This Amendment, the Accounts Agreement, the
Loan and Security Agreement between Coast and Borrower dated June 25, 1996 (the
"Loan Agreement"), any prior written amendments to said agreements signed by
Coast and the Borrower, and all other written documents and agreements between
Coast and the Borrower are referred to herein collectively as the "Loan
Documents." Capitalized terms used but not defined in this Amendment shall have
the meanings set forth in the Loan Agreement.)

     1.  Eligible Receivables. Clause (ii) of Exhibit A to the Accounts
         Agreement, which presently reads: "(ii) ... are on terms which require
         payment in full within 30 days from the date of invoice and are not
         unpaid more than 90 days from the date of the original invoice
         applicable thereto," is amended to read as follows:

         "(ii) ...are not unpaid more than 90 days from the date of the original
         invoice applicable thereto."

     2.  Representations True.  Borrower represents and warrants to Coast that 
         all representations and warranties set forth in the Loan Agreement, as
         amended hereby, are true and correct.

     3.  General Provisions. This Amendment, the Loan Agreement, and the other
         Loan Documents set forth in full all of the representations and
         agreements of the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof and
         supersede all prior discussions, representations, agreements and
         understandings between the parties with respect to the subject hereof.
         Except as herein expressly amended, all of the terms and provisions of
         the Loan Agreement and the other Loan Documents shall continue in full
         force and effect and the same are hereby ratified and confirmed.
<PAGE>   2
Borrower:                                         Coast:

Digital Microwave Corporation        Coast Business Credit, a division of
                                     Southern Pacific Thrift & Loan Association




By: /s/ Carl A. Thomsen              By: /s/ Edit Kondorosi
   ______________________________       _______________________________________
   Carl A. Thomsen                       Edit Kondorosi
   Vice President & Chief                Vice President
   Financial Officer
07/23/201 0 10:3 6 FA X 2024G3514 2 FA A ^ OM S @001/00 1

UNITE D STATE S DEPARTMEN T O F TRANSPORTATIO N FEDERA L AVIATIO N ADMINISTRATIO N

WASHINGTON , D C I n th e Matte r

of : DARB Y AVIATION . IN C Docke t No . CP08SO002 6 bDMSNo.FAA-2008-119 2 Served : Jul y 23 , 201 0 EXTENSIO N O F TIM E Administrativ e La

w Judg e Isaac D . Benkii i serve dawritte n initial decisio n o n Jun e 3 , 2010 , findin g iha

t Respondent

Darb y Aviation , Inc. , di dno t violat e 1 4 C.F.R . § 135.293(a) , a s allege din th e complaint , an ddismissin g th e cas e •wit h prejudice . Th e FA A filed atimel y notic e o f

appeal fro

mth e written initial decision . Unde r 1 4 C.F.R . § § 13.233(c)an d13.2 1 l(e X th e FAA' s appea

l brie f i s du e n o late

r than Jul y 28 , 2010 , unles s a n extensio n o f

tim e i s granted . B y letter date dJul y 23 , 2010 , th e agenc y attorne y requeste da n extensio n o f

lim e unti l Augus i 6 , 2010 , in whic h to perfec t th e agency' s appea

l b y filin g a n appea l brief , lli e agenc y attorne y represente dtha t Respondent' s counse l agree dto a n extensio n oiu p t o 3 0 days . I n light of th e foregoing , th e FAA' s reques t fo r a n extensio n o f

tim e i n whic h t o file it s appea

l brie f i s grante dunder

1 4 C.F.R . § 13.233(c)(1) . Th e FAA' s appeal brief , therefore , i s du e t

o b e filedo

n o r befor e Augus t 6,2010 . J . RANDOLPH BABBIT T ADMINISTRATO R Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n . •-.•• : U J y *

„....,. - * • a i K.. O - Q

C 3 -X-L ; r,- j .,' i ; : 1 . ,r - , >

- H- O -^-'c: > rr; ) • =r H

> » •

- M C D .-— .

?1CK I S . dS^€iN ' Manager , Adjudicatio n Branc h

' Issue dunde r authorit y delegate dt o th e ChierCounse

l an dth e Assistan t Chie f Counse l fo r Litigatio n b y Memorandu

mdate dOctobe r 27 , 1992, unde

r 4 9 U.S.C . § 322(b ) an

d14 C.F.R . § 13.20 2 {se e 5 7 Fed . Reg . 58,28 0 (1992) ) an dredelegatcdb

y the A.s.fisian

t Chie f Counse l fo r Litigatio n t o th e Manager, Adjudicatio

n Branch , b

y Memorandu

mdate dAugus t 6 , 1993 .
2007-2123.

#### Williams v. Hart.

In Habeas Corpus. On petition for writ of habeas corpus of Deangelo Williams. Sua sponte, cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.
§ 727.3 To whom does this part apply? ( a ) This part applies to DOE employees, DOE contractors, DOE contractor and subcontractor employees, and any other individual who has been granted access to a DOE computer or to information on a DOE computer.
( b ) Section 727.4 of this part also applies to any person who uses a DOE computer by sending an e-mail message to such computer.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 832 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 832

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                          May 24, 2006.
    Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker 
may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XVIII, declare the House resolved into the 
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of the 
bill (H.R. 5427) making appropriations for energy and water development for the 
fiscal year ending September 30, 2007, and for other purposes. The first reading 
of the bill shall be dispensed with. All points of order against consideration 
of the bill are waived. General debate shall be confined to the bill and shall 
not exceed one hour equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking 
minority member of the Committee on Appropriations. After general debate the 
bill shall be considered for amendment under the five-minute rule. Points of 
order against provisions in the bill for failure to comply with clause 2 of rule 
XXI are waived except for section 102. During consideration of the bill for 
amendment, the Chairman of the Committee of the Whole may accord priority in 
recognition on the basis of whether the Member offering an amendment has caused 
it to be printed in the portion of the Congressional Record designated for that 
purpose in clause 8 of rule XVIII. Amendments so printed shall be considered as 
read. When the committee rises and reports the bill back to the House with a 
recommendation that the bill do pass, the previous question shall be considered 
as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to final passage without 
intervening motion except one motion to recommit with or without instructions.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
INLAND RETAIL REAL ESTATE TRUST, INC.


AMENDED SCHEDULE A

TO INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT

DATED MAY 1, 2006

BETWEEN

INLAND INVESTMENT ADVISORS, INC ("Adviser")

INLAND RETAIL REAL ESTATE TRUST, INC. ("Client")




1. This Schedule A may be amended from time to time by Adviser upon 30

days' written notice to Client.

2. Fee Schedule as of May 1, 2006: 

Client shall pay or cause to be paid to Adviser as remuneration for its services under this Agreement a percent per annum based on the schedule below as an investment management fee on all assets under management.

A.

as an investment management fee on all equity assets under management:

• from $0 - $10,000,000 fee is 1 percent (1.0%) of assets

• from $10,000,001 - $25,000,000 fee is 90 basis points (.90%) of assets

• from $25,000,001 - $50,000,000 fee is 80 basis points (.80%) of assets

• over $50,000,000 fee is 75 basis points (.75%) of assets

• an additional performance fee calculated at the end of each calendar year of:

• 50 basis points (1/2%) if the annualized net profit is 15% - 20%

• 1% if the annualized net profit is 20%+






B.

as an investment management fee on all contracts (other than covered calls) related to futures and/or options only:

• 50 basis points (1/2 %) on the option value on the date the position is closed; and

• 5% of the all profits earned on futures and/or options provided client earns a annual minimum return of 20% on closed positions during the calendar year ending December 31st or if Agreement is terminated prior to that date earned until such date.  

In addition, Client will be responsible for any third party fees and charges as described in Section II of the Agreement. The fee will be computed and due monthly based on the average daily net asset value. The fee will be deducted from cash available in the account, and if there is no cash available, asset(s) will be sold in an amount equal to the payment due.