alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

201 

KA 14-01229 

PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., PERADOTTO, CARNI, SCONIERS, AND DEJOSEPH, JJ. 

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

ANTWANE WALKER, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

 

J. SCOTT PORTER, SENECA FALLS, FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

WILLIAM J. FITZPATRICK, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, SYRACUSE (VICTORIA M. WHITE

OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from an order of the Onondaga County Court (Thomas J.

Miller, J.), dated June 13, 2014. The order determined that defendant

is a level two risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from an order determining that he

is a level two risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act

(Correction Law § 168 et seq.). Contrary to defendant’s contention,

County Court’s determination that defendant is a level two risk is

based upon clear and convincing evidence (see generally § 168-n [3]). 

The evidence supports the court’s determination that defendant’s

primary purpose in establishing the relationship with the victim was

to victimize her (see People v Washington, 91 AD3d 1277, 1277, lv

denied 19 NY3d 801). Defendant approached the victim on a bus and

thereafter initiated contact with her through Facebook and by cell

phone, even though she had not given defendant her last name or cell

phone number. Defendant then persistently texted the victim and

invited her to dinner, but instead took her to a hotel where he raped

her. “[T]he self-serving denial of defendant that he established the

relationship for the purpose of victimizing the victim presented an

issue of credibility for the court” (People v Romana, 35 AD3d 1241,

1242, lv denied 8 NY3d 810).

Entered: February 13, 2015 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
Exhibit 32



                        President's Written Certification
                             Of Financial Statements
                       Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Statute 1350



     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Statute 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity
as president of Ridgefield Acquisition Corp. (the "Company") that

     (a)  the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-QSB for the period
          ended June 30, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section
          13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

     (b)  the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end
          of such period and the results of operations of the Company for such
          period.


Dated: August 13, 2004


                                            /s/ Steven N. Bronson
                                            ----------------------------------
                                            Steven N. Bronson, President
| USGS HomeContact USGSSearch USGS |
|----------------------------------|
| Fact Sheet 092–95          |

|                                                                                                                                     |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   About USGS /  Science Topics /  Maps, Products & Publications /  Education / FAQ |
|                                                                                                                                     |

## NATURAL ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS OF SILVER-LEAD-ZINC DEPOSITS IN THE BROOKS RANGE,    ALASKA

The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) is investigating the environmental effects  of undisturbed (unmined) silver-lead-zinc deposits in the northwestern Brooks  Range (fig. 1). Metal concentrations and metal dispersion in stream waters  draining the deposits have been determined. Using these data, scientists can:
IV 

House Calendar No. 94 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 580 

[Report No. 115–369] 

Providing for consideration of the Senate amendment to the concurrent resolution (H. Con. Res. 71) establishing the congressional budget for the 

United States Government for fiscal year 2018 and setting forth the 

appropriate budgetary levels for fiscal years 2019 through 2027. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 24, 2017 

Mr. WOODALL, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the Senate amendment to the 

concurrent resolution (H. Con. Res. 71) establishing the 

congressional budget for the United States Government 

for fiscal year 2018 and setting forth the appropriate 

budgetary levels for fiscal years 2019 through 2027. 

1 Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it 

2 shall be in order to take from the Speaker’s table the con3 current resolution (H. Con. Res. 71) establishing the con4 gressional budget for the United States Government for 

5 fiscal year 2018 and setting forth the appropriate budgVerDate Sep 11 2014 21:52 Oct 24, 2017 Jkt 079200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\HR580.RH HR580

ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 580 RH 

1 etary levels for fiscal years 2019 through 2027, with the 

2 Senate amendment thereto, and to consider in the House, 

3 without intervention of any point of order, a motion of4 fered by the chair of the Committee on the Budget or her 

5 designee that the House concur in the Senate amendment. 

6 The Senate amendment and the motion shall be consid7 ered as read. The motion shall be debatable for one hour 

8 equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking 

9 minority member of the Committee on the Budget. The 

10 previous question shall be considered as ordered on the 

11 motion to adoption without intervening motion. 


ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with BILLS

ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with BILLS
House Calendar No. 94 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 580 

[Report No. 115–369] 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the Senate amendels for fiscal years 2019 through 2027. and setting forth the appropriate budgetary lev- United States Government for fiscal year 2018 71) establishing the congressional budget for the ment to the concurrent resolution (H. Con. Res. 

OCTOBER 24, 2017 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 


ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with BILLS
BOBBY JINDAL (;( l\TRi\t ll{ PEGGY M. HATCH :-IJ,RI-:T-\R'I

## ~tatc 

# of JLouisiana DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY 

### ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
Dr. Al Armendariz, Administrator US EPA Region 6 (6-RA) 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 1200 Dallas, TX 75202-2733 RE: State ofLouisiana, Request for Redesignation and Maintenance Plan Letter ofClarificationfor Section 9, ContingencyMeasures DearDr. Armendariz: 

## '" >< -< 

## '" 

# - ;0 <- :::0 ;r. 

### c:: 1'" 

### :z: 

### rn ,- 1'" I 0 -Tl \D 

### rn -Tl 

# - 1'" -0 

## .c:: :;; 3 

### m <J"> <::> N C 

### :<:. 

# .. 0 

### u; \D C5 ;r.

This letter serves to clarify a portion of our SIP submittal entitled, Baton Rouge Ozone Nonattainment Area Redesignation Request and Maintenance Plan. A minor correction to Section 9.2, Contingency Measures, ofthe submittal must be made to reflectthe correct wording of that section. On page 46 of the document, the contingency measures list contains several control measures that may be considered ifthe area exceeds the 1997 8-hour ozone standard. We mistakenly titled one as "anti-backsliding ordinances". This is a typographical error. The contingencymeasure should state "anti-idling ordinances." The department wishes to correct this typographical error prior to EPA's action on the redesignation and maintenance plan submittal. Ifyou have any questions concerning this matter, please contact either Vivian Aucoin at (225) 219-3419 or vivian.aucoin@la.gov or Timothy Bergeron at (225) 219-3410 ortimothy.bergeron@la.gov
.

P . Hatch Secretary C: 

# .
Guy Donaldson, Air Chief US EPA Region 6 (6-PDL) Date

### 6RA.~~:-.\. .•••.•6EN
.**6DRA~~.l** 6WQ•................ 6MD 6SF

.. 60EJ 6RC

.. 6PD.**()(:J~'M!.** 6XA.I(J:1;,.;\•••••••••• 

### C\;
. ..\{1l \
Post Office Box 4313 • Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70821-4313 • Phone 225-219-3181 • Fax 225-219-3309 www.dco.louisiana.pnv
H. Res. 610

In the House of Representatives, U.S., 

December 15, 2005.

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule 

XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the 

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of 

the bill (H.R. 4437) to amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to strengthen enforcement of the immigration laws, 

to enhance border security, and for other purposes. The first 

reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. All points of order 

against consideration of the bill are waived. General debate 

shall be confined to the bill and shall not exceed two hours 

equally divided among and controlled by the chairman and 

ranking minority member of the Committee on the Judiciary 

and the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on Homeland Security. After general debate the bill 

shall be considered for amendment under the five-minute 

rule. The amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on the Judiciary now printed in 

the bill, modified by the amendment printed in part A of the 
2

•HRES 610 EH 

report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution, shall be considered as adopted in the House and in the 

Committee of the Whole. The bill, as amended, shall be considered as the original bill for the purpose of further amendment under the five-minute rule and shall be considered as 

read. All points of order against the bill, as amended, are 

waived. Notwithstanding clause 11 of rule XVIII, no further 

amendment to the bill, as amended, shall be in order except 

those printed in part B of the report of the Committee on 

Rules. Each further amendment may be offered only in the 

order printed in the report, may be offered only by a Member 

designated in the report, shall be considered as read, shall be 

debatable for the time specified in the report equally divided 

and controlled by the proponent and an opponent, shall not 

be subject to amendment, and shall not be subject to a demand for division of the question in the House or in the 

Committee of the Whole. All points of order against such further amendments are waived. After disposition of the further 

amendments printed in part B of the report of the Committee 

on Rules, the Committee of the Whole shall rise without mo-
3

•HRES 610 EH 

tion. No further consideration of the bill shall be in order except pursuant to a subsequent order of the House. 

Attest:

Clerk.
§ 708.30 Timing for issuing an initial agency decision. The Administrative Judge will issue an initial agency decision on the complaint by the 60th day after the later of: ( a ) The date the Administrative Judge approves the parties' agreement not to hold a hearing;
( b ) The date the Administrative Judge receives the transcript of the hearing; or
( c ) The date the Administrative Judge receives post-hearing submissions permitted under § 708.28(b)(7) of this subpart.
§ 75.33 Accounting reports. ( a ) ( 1 ) The accounting reports for each IAEA material balance area must consist of: ( i ) Inventory Change Reports (Nuclear Material Transaction Report); and
( ii ) Material status reports showing the material balance based on a physical inventory of nuclear material actually present.
( 2 ) These prescribed computer-readable forms replace the following forms which have been submitted in paper form: ( i ) The DOE/NRC Form 741; and
( ii ) The DOE/NRC Form 742.
( b ) The reports shall be based on data available as of the date of reporting and may be corrected at a later date, as required.
[45 FR 50711, July 31, 1980, as amended at 49 FR 19629, May 9, 1984; 59 FR 35622, July 13, 1994; 73 FR 78613, Dec. 23, 2008; 83 FR 19613, May 4, 2018]
# EUR-Lex - 31980L0590 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31980L0590

**Commission Directive 80/590/EEC of 9 June 1980 determining the symbol that may accompany materials and articles intended to come into contact with foodstuffs **

*
Official Journal L 151 , 19/06/1980 P. 0021 - 0022 Finnish special edition: Chapter 13 Volume 10 P. 0203 Greek special edition: Chapter 13 Volume 9 P. 0125 Swedish special edition: Chapter 13 Volume 10 P. 0203 Spanish special edition: Chapter 13 Volume 11 P. 0024 Portuguese special edition Chapter 13 Volume 11 P. 0024 *

COMMISSION DIRECTIVE of 9 June 1980 determining the symbol that may accompany materials and articles intended to come into contact with foodstuffs (80/590/EEC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community,

Having regard to Council Directive 76/893/EEC of 23 November 1976 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to materials and articles intended to come into contact with foodstuffs (1), and in particular the last indent of Article 7 (1) (a) thereof,

Whereas the last indent of Article 7 (1) (a) of Directive 76/893/EEC provides for the determination of a symbol that may accompany materials and articles instead of the particulars "for food use" or a specific indication as to the use of such materials and articles;

Whereas such symbol must be easy to understand ; whereas in addition it must be possible to reproduce it on materials and articles or on other media under the best possible technical conditions;

Whereas the symbol reproduced in the Annex hereto meets these criteria;

Whereas the measures provided for in this Directive are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on Foodstuffs,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DIRECTIVE:

Article 1

The symbol referred to in the last indent of Article 7 (1) (a) of Directive 76/893/EEC shall be that reproduced in the Annex hereto.

Article 2

The Member States shall take the measures necessary to authorize with effect from 1 January 1981 the use of the symbol referred to in Article 1.

Article 3

This Directive is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 9 June 1980.

For the Commission

Étienne DAVIGNON

Member of the Commission (1)OJ No L 340, 9.12.1976, p. 19.

BILAG - ANHANG - ANNEX - ANNEXE - ALLEGATO - BIJLAGE

>PIC FILE= "T0013289">
§ 81.11 Policy. ( a ) The inventions covered by the U.S. patents and patent applications vested in the Government of the United States of America, as represented by or in the custody of the Commission, normally will best serve the public interest when they are developed to the point of practical application and made available to the public in the shortest time possible.
( b ) The Commission generally prefers to make these inventions available to all interested parties through the granting of nonexclusive licenses. However, the Commission recognizes that to obtain commercial utilization of an invention, it may be necessary to grant an exclusive license for a limited period of time as an incentive for the investment of risk capital to achieve practical application of an invention.
( c ) Whenever the Commission deems it appropriate to grant an exclusive license, the license will be negotiated on terms and conditions most favorable to the interests of the public and the Government. In considering the accord of such a license, due weight will be given to assisting small business and minority business enterprises, as well as economically depressed, low income and labor surplus areas within the United States.
( d ) All licenses shall be by express written instruments. No license shall be granted or implied in an NRC invention except as provided for in these regulations or in patent rights articles under Commission procurement regulations, pursuant to the Act, or pursuant to any existing or future treaty or agreement between the United States and any foreign government or intergovernmental organization.
( e ) No grant of a license under this subpart shall be construed to confer upon any licensee any immunity from the antitrust laws or from liability for patent misuse, and the acquisition and use of rights pursuant to this subpart shall not be immunized from the operation of State or Federal law by reason of the source of the grant.
( f ) No grant of a license under this subpart shall be construed to confer any authorization under chapters 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, or any other chapter or section of the Act (42 U.S.C., sec. 2011-2296) for which separate application for a license must be made in accordance with the Act or other Commission regulations.
#### LESTER v. VILLAGE OF BLASDELL.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

March 3, 1915.)

Appeal from Special Term. Proceeding by Jessie I. Lester against the Village of Blasdell. From an order for plaintiff, defendant appeals.

Affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed, with costs.

KRUSE, P. J.

(dissenting). I think the order of reference was one to hear and determine. The referee heard and decided the matter, making findings of fact and conclusions of law, to which exceptions were filed, but omitted formally to direct judgment to be entere,d. Thereupon a motion to confirm the report was made at Special Term; but the Special Term, instead of treating the application as a motion, made findings and decided the matter directly contrary to the referee’s decision, and judgment was entered thereupon. I think the only order the Special Term could make was to send the matter back to the referee, to make a formal decision and direct judgment to be entered thereupon, as the Code provides. Smith v. Geiger, 202 N. Y. 306, 95 N. E. 706. While the motion to confirm the report of the referee was entirely unnecessary, I think the making of the motion did not have the effect to change the reference from one to hear and determine to one to take proof and report,, with the opinion of the referee. The question of a want of power to decide the matter anew by the Special Term was specifically raised by exceptions filed to the decision of the Special Term. I think the judgment should be reversed, and the matter sent back to the referee.
IV 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 525 

Designating September 16, 2017, as ‘‘Isaac M. Wise Temple Day’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 14, 2017 

Mr. CHABOT submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Designating September 16, 2017, as ‘‘Isaac M. Wise Temple 

Day’’. 

Whereas 2017 marks the 175th anniversary of the incorporation of the congregation of the Isaac M. Wise Temple in 

Cincinnati, Ohio; 

Whereas 2017 marks the 150th anniversary of the establishment of the current site for the Isaac M. Wise Temple, 

also known as the ‘‘Plum Street Temple’’; 

Whereas Rabbi Isaac M. Wise led that congregation for nearly a half century, establishing the congregation as the 

cradle of American Reform Judaism and helping to make 

Cincinnati a center of Jewish life in the United States; 

Whereas Rabbi Isaac M. Wise founded the Union of American Hebrew Congregations (now known as the ‘‘Union 

for Reform Judaism’’) in 1873 and the Central ConVerDate Sep 11 2014 02:43 Sep 15, 2017 Jkt 069200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6300 E:\BILLS\HR525.IH HR525

dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 525 IH 

ference of Reform Rabbis in 1889 to help lead the United 

States Jewish Reform movement; 

Whereas Rabbi Isaac M. Wise founded the Hebrew Union 

College in Cincinnati in 1875, now the oldest rabbinical 

school in continuous existence in the United States; and 

Whereas the Isaac M. Wise Plum Street Temple is listed on 

the National Register of Historic Places for the significant role that the Temple played in the history of Reform 

Judaism and for the unique Moorish architectural style 

of the Temple: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) supports the designation of ‘‘Isaac M. Wise 

3 Temple Day’’; and 

4 (2) recognizes the importance of the Isaac M. 

5 Wise Temple in— 

6 (A) United States Jewish history; 

7 (B) establishing Cincinnati, Ohio, as a 

8 great center of Jewish life; and 

9 (C) contributing to religious life in the 

10 United States. 

Æ 


dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
IV 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 829 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the Shadow Wolves 

should be preserved and fostered as one unit, located on the Tohono 

O’odham lands. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 19, 2006 

Mr. SOUDER (for himself, Mr. SHADEGG, Mr. KING of Iowa, Mr. GRIJALVA, 

and Mr. COLE of Oklahoma) submitted the following resolution; which 

was referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that 

the Shadow Wolves should be preserved and fostered 

as one unit, located on the Tohono O’odham lands. 

Whereas in 1972, the 92nd Congress created a specialized 

unit of Customs Patrol Officers known as the Shadow 

Wolves to patrol the international land border within the 

Tohono O’odham sovereign Indian nation in Arizona; 

Whereas the Shadow Wolves are Native Americans who combine modern technology with traditional tracking techniques to identify, track and arrest illegal drug smugglers 

along the 76 miles of border and within the 2.8 million 

acres of the Tohono O’odham nation; 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 829 IH

Whereas although never constituting more than 21 specialized agents, the Shadow Wolves have consistently succeeded in seizing over 100,000 pounds of illegal narcotics 

annually; 

Whereas the Shadow Wolves are a singular example of a unit 

that is uniquely suited to meet the special challenges in 

border protection present in their area in a way that no 

other unit or combination of units could be expected to 

match; and 

Whereas the Federal Government should take all reasonable 

steps to prevent the loss of such a vital asset for the securing of our borders and the fight against illegal narcotics trafficking: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that the Shadow Wolves should be preserved 

3 and fostered as one unit, located on the Tohono O’odham 

4 lands, so that they might continue to apply their unique 

5 abilities in helping the United States to protect its bor6 ders. 

Æ 


sroberts on PROD1PC70 with BILLS