UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION

WASHINGTON, DC

IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION OF
LAMAC ENGINEERING COMPANY, INC.

for an exemption from part 21 and §§ 45.23, 45.29, 61.3, 61.113, 61.133,

91.7(a), 9 1.9 (b)(2)

, 91.109 (a) , 91. 119, 91.121, 91.151(a), 91.203 (a) and (b),

and 91.401

- 91.417 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations

.

Submitted on February 9 , 2015

Kelli Storckman

Rhine Ernest LLP

One Main Street, Suite 600

Evansville, IN 477 08
Telephone: 812

- 759

- 0600

Facsimile: 812

- 759

- 0601
Attorney for PetitionerU.S. Department of Transportation

Docket Management System
1200 New Jersey Ave., SE
Washington, DC 20590

Re: Exemption Request Under Section 333 of the FAA Reform Act and Part 11 of the Federal
Aviation Regulations

Dear Madam, Sir,

Pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (the “Reform Act”)
and 14 C.F.R. Part 11, Lamac Engineering Company, Inc. (“ Lamac ”), an operator of the eBee

Unma nned Aircraft System (“eBee”) seeks an exemption from the Federal Aviation Regulations (“FARs”) listed below:

 14 C.F.R. 21

 14 C.F.R. 45.23

 14 C.F.R

. 45.29

 14 C.F.R. 61.3

 14 C.F.R. 61.11 3(a) &(b)

 14 C.F.R. 61.133(a)

 14 C.F.R. 91.7(a )

 14 C.F.R. 91.9(b)(2)

 14 C.F.R. 91.109(a)

 14 C.F.R. 91.119

 14 C.F.R. 91.121

 14 C.F.R. 91.151(a)

 14 C.F.R. 91.203(a) & (b)

 14 CFR Subpart E (91.401

- 91.417)

The requested exemption would authorize commercial operations using the eBee for mapping and survey applications. These op erations will be subject to strict operating requirements defined in the eBee user manual ( Lamac requests the FAA treat the eBee training program as proprietary under 14 C.F.R. 11.35(b) and does not include this document in the public docket , rather submits this information by mail under separate cover ) and condition s defined by the Safety Code of the Academy of Model Aeronautics (see Annex B), in order to ensure at least an equivalent level of safety to currently authorized operations using manned aircrafts.

The eBee wi ll be operated by an individual whom meets the following requirements:

1. Possesses a private pilot license or is being supervised by an individual possessing a private pilot license;

2. H as successfully completed the PPL ground school ; and

3. Has passed a manufacturer’ s training program for the eBee. Lamac requests the FAA treat the eBee training program as proprietary under 14 C.F.R. 11.35(b) and does not

include thi s document in the public docket , rather submits this information by mail under separate cover

.1. APPLICANT

The name and address of the Petitioner is:

Lamac Engineering Company, Inc.

323 W. 3 rd Street

M t. Carmel, IL 62863

The point of contact for the Petitioner is:

Kelli Storckman

Rhine Ernest LLP

631 N. Market Street

Mt. Carmel, IL 62863

Telephone: 618

- 262

- 8611

Facsimile: 618

- 262

- 7145

Email: kstorckman@rhine

- ernest.com

2 . CHARACTERISTICS OF THE AIRCRAFT

The eBee is a small (37.8 inches wingspan) and ultra

- light (maximum take

- off weight of 1.7 pounds) platform made of flexible foam that performs pre

- programmed precision aerial mapping

missions thanks to the on

- board GPS and the related flight ma nagement software (eMotion) that allows the operator to plan safely and efficiently a mission in 3D, and then monitor it in real

- time. Thanks to the embedded camera, protected by a foam envelope, the eBee takes a collection of high

- definition still images that are used later to generate maps and contour lines of the surveyed

area.

The four main characteristics of the eBee are:

a. Very light weight

The eBee is so light that the operator can launch it by hand and let it land on almost any surface

without requiring a parachute or landing net (belly land). Its low impact energy ( 38 J in case of a controlled emergency landing ) also significantly reduces the risk of hazardous situations. Finally, the wings of the eBee are detachable and made of flexible foam w ith no sharp or hard edges and almost no internal strengthening structure.

b. Electric

- powered

The eBee is electric powered. A brushless engine technology makes it silent and reliable. The propeller is attached with a rubber band to the body of the plan e so that it can easily flex away in case of contact with any object.

c. Semi

- automatic flight

The artificial intelligence incorporated within the eBee autopilot system continuously analyzesdata from the Inertial Measurement Unit and from the onboard G PS and takes care of all the

aspects of the flight under the supervision of the operator.

d. Option for Manual control

Additionally, the eBee provides an override capability that allows the operator to take manual actions during the flight (Go to Home, G o Land, Hold and Resume the mission) and also suspend automated operations and take manual control of the aircraft should it become necessary to respond to emergent circumstances, thanks to the remote controller provided with the system.

3. APPLICABLE LE GAL STANDARD UNDER SECTION 333

a. Airworthiness assessment of the eBee

Lamac notes that the airworthiness of the eBee has already been demonstrated for different projects in the United States, involving state/federal agencies or universities (among other s the New Mexico State University: https://newscenter.nmsu.edu/Articles/view/10208/nmsu

- uas

- flight

test

- center

- conducts

- ebee

- a irworthiness

- assessment , and the USACE New Orleans, who coordinated with the Department of Army and the FAA to obtain all authorizations required i n order to operate the eBee UAS).

Moreover, SenseFly obtained flight approvals for the eBee (delivered by n ational civil aviation authorities) in many countries, among others:

 Switzerland (flight approval for VLOS operations)

 Canada (flight approval for VLOS operations)

 Australia (flight approval for VLOS operations)

 France (flight approval for Extended

- VLOS o perations)

 Germany (flight approval for VLOS operations)

 United Kingdom (flight approval for VLOS operations)

 Norway (flight approval for VLOS operations)

 Sweden (flight approval for VLOS operations)

 Denmark (flight approval for VLOS operations)

b. Operat ing requirements

Grant of the exemption to Lamac for the eBee will be subject to the following operating requirements , based on the operating conditions set forth by the Academy of Model Aeronautics (see Annex B). The main restrictions are summarized belo w:

 Operations to be conducted over private, controlled

- access, or public property where approved;

 Permission from the land owner/authority required before commencing any flight;

 Operations over congested areas shall be avoided;

 Operations must not interfe re with manned aircraft operations, must yield the right of way to manned aircraft, and operators must See & Avoid other aircraft and obstacles at all

times ;

 Operations limited to Visual Flight Rules Meteorological Conditions (VMC) and daylight

hours ;

 Airc raft operations must remain within Visual Line of Sight (VLOS) and will be visuallymonitored at all times;

 VLOS guaranteed with a GPS geo

- fence around operator of 0.5 miles ;

 Flight ceiling pre

- programed at 400 feet;

 All operations conducted within 5 miles from an airport shall only be initiated after verbal coordination with the airport authority, or air traffic control when a control tower is present at the airport;

 All operations shall comply with required permissions and permits established by

territor ial, state, county or city jurisdictions; including local law enforcement, fire, or other appropriate governmental agencies.

 The eBee operations will be compliant with existing safety procedures inherent to the activities of the related company.

c. Operat or Requirements

The eBee operator wi ll have successfully completed the PPL ground test and passed a manufacturer’ s training program for the eBee

. Additionally, the operator will possess a private pilot license or be supervised by someone who possess such a license.

4 . CONCLUSION

By granting this exemption, the FAA Administrator will be fulfilling the Congressional mandate

of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 . Approval of the exemption is in the public interest for it will reduce congestion of the National Airspace System and will benefit the economy by allowing the state based Petitioner to economically provide surveying and mapping services to the public.

Yours sincerely,

/s/Kelli Storckman

Kelli Storckman Attorney for Petitioner

Rhine Ernest LLP

631 N . Market Street
Mt. Carmel, IL 62863 Telephone: 618

- 262

- 8611

Facsimile: 618

- 262

- 7145A NNEX A: EXEMPTIO N REQUEST AND EQUIVALENT LEVEL OF SAFETY

SHOWINGS UNDER APPLICABLE RULES SUBJECT TO EXEMPTION

Lamac requests an exemption from the followi ng regulations as well as any additional regulations that may technically apply to the operation of the eBee:

14 C.F.R. Part 21, Subpart H: Airworthiness Certificates

14 CFR § 91.203(a)(1)

Section 91.203 requires all civil aircraft to have a certificat e of airworthiness. Part 21, Subpart H, entitled Airworthiness Certificates, establishes the procedural requirements for the issuance of airworthiness certificates as required by FAR § 91.203(a). Given the size of the eBee, its very light weight (the maxim um take

- off weight is 1.7 pounds) and the limited operating area associated with its utilization, it is unnecessary to go through the certificate of airworthiness process under Part 21 Subpart H in order to achieve or exceed current safety levels.

Such a n exemption meets the requirements of an equivalent level of safety under Part 11 and

Section 333 of the Reform Act. The Federal Aviation Act and Section 333 of the Reform Act both authorize the FAA to exempt aircraft from the requirement for an airworthin ess certificate, upon consideration of the size, weight, speed, operational capability, and proximity to airports and populated areas of the UAS involved. An analysis of these different criteria demonstrates that the eBee operated without an airworthiness certificate, under the conditions proposed in that exemption, will be at least as safe, or safer, than a conventional aircraft with an airworthiness certificate. A proprietary risk assessment for operations with the eBee, which demonstrates that
assertion, is also being submitted to the FAA as part of this application. Lamac requests the FAA treat the eBee risk assessment as proprietary under 14 C.F.R. 11.35(b) and not include this document in the public docket.

14 C.F.R. § 45.23 & 14 C.F.R. § 45.29: Displ ay of marks; size of marks

These regulations provide that each aircraft must display "N" and the aircraft's registration number in letters at least 3 inches high. Additionally, the aircraft must display the word

"EXPERIMENTAL" in letters at least 2 inche s high near the entrance to the cabin, cockpit, or pilot station.

Given the size of the eBee (wingspan of 37.8 inches), this requirement is impossible to match.

14 C.F.R. § 61.3: Requirements for certificates, ratings and authorizations

14 C.F.R. § 61. 113(a) & (b); 61.133(a): Private Pilot Privileges and Limitations; Pilot in
Command; Commercial Pilot Privileges and Limitations

The regulation provides that no person may serve as a required pilot flight crewmember of a civil

aircraft of the United Stat es, unless that person:

(1) Has a pilot certificate or special purpose pilot authorization issued under this part in that person's physical possession or readily accessible in the aircraft when exercising the privileges of that pilot certificate or author ization. However, when the aircraft is operated within a foreign country, a pilot license issued by that country may be used.The regulation provides also that no person that holds a private pilot certificate may act as pilot in

command of an aircraft for compensation or hire. Subparagraph (b) allows a private pilot to act as pilot in command of an aircraft in connection with any business or employment if:

(1) The flight is only incidental to that business or employment; (2) The aircraft does not carry passengers or property for compensation or hire.

Given the safety features of the eBee and the fact that the missions are pre

- programmed and

monitored in real

- time with a specific flight management software (eMotion), SenseFly proposes
that operators of t he eBee should not be required to hold a commercial or private pilot

certification. Instead, operators should be required to:

1. Possess a private pilot license or work under the Responsible Charge of an i ndividual possessing a private pilot license;

2. S uccess fully complete the PPL ground school; and

3. Pass a manufacturer’ s training program for the eBee. Lamac requests the FAA treat the eBee training program as proprietary under 14 C.F.R. 11.35(b) and does not

include thi s document in the public docket.

The Ap plicant, Lamac Engineering, as an engineering and surveying firm, commonly has

u nlicensed persons working in the field under the Responsible Charge of a licensed Engineer or
licensed Surveyor. T he Applicant will employ one or more licensed private pilots to ove rsee any operation of the eBee and seeks the Administration’s approval in this practice.

14 C.F.R. § 91.7(a): Civil aircraft airworthiness

This regulation requires that no person may operate a civil aircraft unless it is in airworthy

condition. Sh ould the exemption be granted allowing commercial operation of the eBee without

an airworthiness certificate, no standard will exist for airworthiness of the eBee. Given the size of the aircraft and the previous airworthiness assessments given to the eBee, among others:

 New Mexico State University: https://newscenter.nmsu.edu/Articles/view/10208/nmsu

uas

- flight

- test

- center

- condu cts

- ebee

- airworthiness

- assessment

 USACE New Orleans, who coordinated with the Department of Army and the FAA to obtain all authorizations required in order to operate the eBee UAS for levee system monitoring, documentation of construction progress, and e xtensive oblique photography

of USACE structures & activities

An equivalent level of safety will be achieved by insuring compliance with the SenseFly manuals prior to each flight.

14 C.F.R. § 91.9: Civil aircraft flight manual, marking, and placard req uirements.

This regulation provides that no person may operate an aircraft unless a current, approved flight

manual is in the aircraft. Lamac assumes that the intent of this requirement is to ensure that flight

manual information is available to the airc rew while operating the aircraft. Lamac requests an exemption to this requirement since the aircraft is not only too small to carry documentation, the

documentation would not be available to the crew.The equivalent level of safety will be achieved by ke eping a hard copy of the flight manual in the

eBee transportation box.

14 C.F.R. § 91.109(a) : Flight Instruction

The regulation provides that "No person may operate a civil aircraft that is being used for flight

instruction unless that aircraft has full y functioning dual controls."

Flight instruction will be accomplished through an elaborated training program, using first the simulation mode of the flight management software eMotion. The equivalent level of safety during the training will be achieved b y the manufacturer or authorized distributor providing the training and through the use of experienced and qualified operators familiar with the eBee.

14 CFR § 91.119: Minimum Safe Altitudes

The regulation provides that over sparsely populated areas the aircraft cannot be operated closer than 500 feet to any person, vessel, vehicle, or structure. Since the aircraft will be operating at a maximum of 400 feet AGL, the eBee cannot comply with this requirement.

The equivalent level of safety will be achieved because the eBee will only fly over private property with the permission of the landowner. The operator will define before every flight a working area radius and a flight area ceiling, preventing the eBee to go beyond the flight area.

The landowner and th e persons who may be on the ground in the flight area will be briefed of the expected route of flight and the associated risks to persons and property on the ground. Due to the
small size of the eBee and the material with which the eBee is built, the hazar d to persons, vessels, vehicles, and structures is not comparable to manned aircraft and should be considered in granting the exemption.

Moreover, the aircraft will not be operated over congested areas nor over any open

- air assembly of persons. The aircr aft will be operated at an altitude allowing, if a power unit fails, an emergency landing without undue hazard to persons or property on the surface.

14 CFR 91.121

– Altimeter settings

This section requires that each person operating an aircraft shall ma intain the cruising altitude or flight level of that aircraft, as the case may be, by reference to an altimeter that is set, when operating below 18,000 feet MSL to:

 The current reported altimeter setting of a station along the route and within 100 nautic al
miles of the aircraft;

 If there is no station within the area prescribed in paragraph (a)(1)(i) of this section, the current reported altimeter setting of an appropriate available station;

 In the case of an aircraft not equipped with a radio, the elevat ion of the departure airport or an appropriate altimeter setting available before departure.

To provide an equivalent level of safety, the eBee autopilot calculates the reference altitude (ground level) with the on

- board GPS during the pre

- flight tests. T he GPS and barometer data are merged with respect to their respective precisions. The GPS provides reliable information to correct potential barometric bias, while rapid variations in altitude are detected through thebarometer. Hence, barometric bias indu ced by environmental factors is rejected.

14 C.F.R. § 91.151(a): Fuel Requirements for Flight in VFR Conditions

The regulation provides that no person may begin a flight in an airplane under day

- VFR conditions unless there is enough fuel to fly to the fi rst point of intended landing and to fly after

that for at least 30 minutes.

Given the area of operation for the eBee, Lamac believes that an equivalent level of safety is already achieved with the specific procedure preventing the e Bee to accept a take

- o ff order if the battery level is below a given value. Moreover, SenseFly has integrated “low” and “critical” battery level warnings and implemented a “return to Home” (and “Go Land”) action in these

situations.

14 C.F.R. § 91.203 (a) & (b): Carrying Civi l Aircraft Certification and Registration

This regulation provides as follows:

 No person may operate a civil aircraft unless it has an appropriate and current

airworthiness certificate.

 No person may operate a civil aircraft unless the airworthiness certi ficate required by
paragraph (a) of this section or a special flight authorization issued under §91.715 is
displayed at the cabin or cockpit entrance so that it is legible to passengers or crew.

The eBee weighs only 1.7 pounds (max take

- off weight). As su ch, there is no ability or place to carry certification and registration documents or to display them on the UAS. In addition, there is no pilot or passengers on board the aircraft.

To obtain an equivalent level of safety and meet the intent of 91.203, La mac propose s that documents deemed appropriate for this aircraft by the FAA will be co

- located with the operator at the ground control station in the eBee box and available for inspection upon request

14 CFR Subpart E (91.401

- 91.417)

- Maintenance, Prev entive Maintenance, and

Alterations

The regulation provides that the operator is primarily responsible for maintaining the aircraft in an airworthy condition, including compliance with Parts 39 and 43. Paragraphs 91.407 and 91.409 require that the aircra ft be "approved for return to service by a person authorized under 43.7" after maintenance and inspection. Section 91.409(a)(2) requires an annual inspection for the issuance of an airworthiness certificate. Section 91.417(a) requires the owner or operator to keep records showing certain maintenance work that has been accomplished by certificated mechanics, under Part 43, or licensed pilots and records of approval of the aircraft for return to service.

Lamac proposes that the maintenance of the eBee will b e accomplished by the owner/operator according to the maintenance manual, provided by SenseFly. Lamac requests the FAA treat the eBee training program as proprietary under 14 C.F.R. 11.35(b) and not include this document in the public docket.

An equivale nt level of safety will be achieved because the eBee is small in size, it is not a complex mechanical device, it will carry no external payload, and it will operate only in restrictedpredetermined areas. Moreover, the operator is the person most familiar with the aircraft and is

best suited to maintain the aircraft in an airworthy condition and to ensure an equivalent level of safety. Finally, before every flight, the eBee runs automatically a sequence of pre

- flight tests to make sure that every sensor and every critical part is running properly. If a problem is detected,

the eBee will not be able to be switched

- on and a message error is displayed on the main screen of

t he flight management software . The operator can then refer to the maintenance manual to troubleshoot this issue. Several parts of the eBee are easily interchangeable (propellers, wings), which allows the operator to make sure the wings and propulsion system are always airworthy

when a mission is initiated.A NNEX B: ACADEMY OF MODEL AERONAUTICS SAFETY REQUIREMENTS

http://www.modelaircraft.org/files/105.pdf

http://www.modelaircraft.or g/files/540

- D.pdf

http://www.modelaircraft.org/files/560.pdf