alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Appendix A. Universe of Tanks and Estimated Facilities by State

State

Number of Active 

Tanks (a)

Estimated Number of 

Facilities (b)

% of UST Facilities in 

Significant Operational 

Compliance w/UST 

Release Detection and 

Release Prevention (c)

Region 1

Connecticut 11,439 4,317 61%

Maine 3,308 1,248 68%

Massachusetts 11,758 4,671 23%

New Hampshire 2,891 1,091 53%

Rhode Island 1,648 622 61%

Vermont 3,039 1,147 59%

Region 2

New Jersey 17,467 6,591 5%

New York 28,749 10,849 67%

Puerto Rico 4,603 1,737 82%

Virgin Islands 144 54 60%

Region 3

Delaware 1,585 589 60%

District of Columbia 720 272 56%

Maryland 9,418 3,752 80%

Pennsylvania 25,116 9,478 63%

Virginia 21,824 7,875 58%

West Virginia 5,891 2,223 62%

Region 4

Alabama 18,144 6,693 61%

Florida 29,028 11,032 85%

Georgia 29,054 10,063 73%

Kentucky 12,749 4,811 39%

Mississippi 8,610 3,249 73%

North Carolina 29,424 11,103 62%

South Carolina 12,027 4,538 76%

Tennessee 17,637 6,567 81%

Region 5

Illinois 22,875 8,632 40%

Indiana 14,111 5,325 74%

Michigan 20,420 7,706 39%

Minnesota 14,236 6,341 55%

Ohio 23,594 8,903 59%

Wisconsin 12,651 4,466 68%

Region 6

Arkansas 9,597 3,622 56%

Louisiana 14,047 5,301 55%

New Mexico 4,089 1,543 86%

Oklahoma 11,378 4,294 69%

Texas 56,265 21,232 64%

Region 7

Iowa 7,492 2,827 74%
Kansas 7,102 2,680 71%

Missouri 9,997 4,154 51%

Nebraska 6,915 2,609 44%

Region 8

Colorado 7,981 3,012 71%

Montana 3,308 1,248 75%

North Dakota 2,168 818 70%

South Dakota 3,019 1,139 63%

Utah 4,065 1,534 64%

Wyoming 2,037 769 88%

Region 9

American Samoa 16 6 Data Not Available

Arizona 6,875 2,594 80%

California 37,750 14,245 75%

CNMI 75 28 100%

Guam 259 98 75%

Hawaii 1,755 662 92%

Nevada 4,080 1,482 76%

Region 10

Alaska 1,145 516 73%

Idaho 3,395 1,281 55%

Oregon 6,181 2,332 76%

Washington 10,299 3,886 51%

Total 635,450 239,859 65%

Notes:

(a) All data were obtained from EPA's FY 2006 End-of-Year Activity Report (November 14, 2006) except the 

number of active tanks was obtained from 13 state databases by E2 Inc. Data from these states are shaded. 

The EPA data do not include tanks located on Tribal lands. 

(b) E2 Inc. estimated a tank to facility ratio of 2.65 from its analysis of tank and facility information obtained from 

13 state databases. However, actual facility counts from these 13 states are presented. Data from these 

states are shaded.

(c) Compliance data obtained from EPA's FY 2006 End-of-Year Activity Report.
`[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 862 Reported in House (RH)]







                                                 House Calendar No. 192
109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 862

                          [Report No. 109-498]

   Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to 
  consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on 
                                 Rules.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 12, 2006

  Mr. Lincoln Diaz-Balart, from the Committee on Rules, reported the 
  following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and 
                         ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION


 
   Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to 
  consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on 
                                 Rules.

    Resolved,  That the requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII for a 
two-thirds vote to consider a report from the Committee on Rules on the 
same day it is presented to the House is waived with respect to any 
resolution reported on the legislative day of June 13, 2006, providing 
for consideration of the bill (H.R. 5576) making appropriations for the 
Departments of Transportation, Treasury, and Housing and Urban 
Development, the Judiciary, District of Columbia, and independent 
agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2007, and for other 
purposes.
                                                 House Calendar No. 192

109th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                              H. RES. 862

                          [Report No. 109-498]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

   Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to 
  consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on 
                                 Rules.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             June 12, 2006

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed`
CDC’s Response to Zika

PREGNANT and living in an area with Zika?

What we know about Zika

 Zika can be passed from a pregnant woman to her fetus. 

 Infection with Zika during pregnancy is linked

to birth defects in babies. 

 Zika is spread mostly by the bite

of an infected Aedes species

mosquito. 

» These mosquitoes

are aggressive

daytime biters.

They also bite

at night.

 There is no vaccine

to prevent or

medicine to

treat Zika. 

 Zika can be spread by a

man to his sex partners.

What we don’t know 

about Zika

 When during pregnancy Zika 

might cause harm to the fetus.

 How likely it is that Zika 

infection will affect your 

pregnancy.

 If your baby will develop birth 

defects from the infection. 

Symptoms of Zika

Most people with Zika won’t even know they have it. The 

illness is usually mild with symptoms lasting for several 

days to a week. 

The most common symptoms of Zika are

 Fever

 Rash

 Joint Pain

 Red eyes

CS263062-I March 11, 2016
CDC recommends special precautions for pregnant 

women and women trying to become pregnant

Pregnant? 

Pregnant women and their male partners should 

strictly follow steps to prevent mosquito bites.

If you have a male partner, either use condoms 

the right way every time you have sex during your 

pregnancy, or do not have sex.

If you develop the symptoms of Zika, see a

healthcare provider right away for testing.

Testing is recommended for pregnant women at their 

first prenatal care visit.

Trying to become 

pregnant? 

Women trying to become pregnant 

and their male partners should 

strictly follow steps to prevent 

mosquito bites.

Talk to your healthcare provider 

about plans to become pregnant.

Your Best Protection: Prevent Mosquito Bites

Clothing

 Wear long-sleeved shirts and long pants. 

 Treat clothing and gear with permethrin or purchase permethrin-treated items. 

» Treated clothing remains protective after multiple washings. See product

information to learn how long the protection will last.

» If treating items yourself, follow the product instructions carefully.

 Do NOT use permethrin products directly on skin. They are intended to treat clothing.

Indoor Protection

 Stay in places with air conditioning or that use window and door screens to 

keep mosquitoes outside.

 Sleep under a mosquito bed net if air conditioned or screened rooms are not 

available or if sleeping outdoors.

Repellent

Use Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)-registered insect repellents. When used

as directed, these insect repellents are safe and effective for pregnant and

breastfeeding women. 

 Always follow the product label instructions. 

 Reapply as directed. 

 Do not spray repellent on the skin under clothing. 

 If you are also using sunscreen, apply sunscreen before applying insect repellent. 

NO!

www.cdc.gov/zika
#### ALTHERR, Respondent, v. SOHMER, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

June 12, 1914.)

Action by Henry R. Altherr against Edwin W. Sohmer.

No opinion. Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Betty McPherson, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant, as limited by her motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, imposed November 7, 1979, upon her conviction of manslaughter in the first degree, upon her plea of guilty, the sentence being an indeterminate term of imprisonment with a minimum of 4 years and a maximum of 12 years. Sentence modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by reducing it to an indeterminate period of imprisonment with a minimum of two years eight months, and a maximum of eight years. As so modified, sentence affirmed. The sentence was excessive to the extent indicated. Mollen, P. J., Hopkins, Damiani and Titone, JJ., concur.
#### § 2520.10 What does this part do?

This part adopts the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) guidance in subparts A through I of 2 CFR part 180, as supplemented by this part, as the NSF policies and procedures for nonprocurement debarment and suspension. It thereby gives regulatory effect for NSF to the OMB guidance as supplemented by this part. This part satisfies the requirements in section 3 of Executive Order 12549, “Debarment and Suspension” (3 CFR 1986 Comp., p. 189), Executive Order 12689, “Debarment and Suspension” (3 CFR 1989 Comp., p. 235) and 31 U.S.C. 6101 note (Section 2455, Public Law 103-355, 108 Stat. 3327).
Order entered September 6, 2016

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-01064-CR

LARRY LYNN ROBINSON, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 7

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F-1451103-Y

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s September 2, 2016 motion requesting immediate release. 

Our opinion issued on January 27, 2016. The court of criminal appeals denied appellant’s 

petition for discretionary review on April 13, 2016, and our mandate issued on May 17, 2016. 

Appellant’s motion is DENIED.

/s/ ADA BROWN 

JUSTICE
#### § 1108.400 Unobligated balance.

*Unobligated balance* means the amount of funds under an award or subaward that the recipient or subrecipient has not obligated. The amount is computed by subtracting the cumulative amount of the recipient's or subrecipient's unliquidated obligations and expenditures of funds from the cumulative amount of funds that it was authorized to obligate under the award or subaward.
# EUR-Lex - 31981R0040 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31981R0040

**Council Regulation (EEC) No 40/81 of 1 January 1981 fixing the basic prices and the buying-in prices applicable in Greece to cauliflowers and apples **

*
Official Journal L 003 , 01/01/1981 P. 0011 - 0011 Spanish special edition: Chapter 03 Volume 20 P. 0168 Portuguese special edition Chapter 03 Volume 20 P. 0168 *

COUNCIL REGULATION (EEC) No 40/81 of 1 January 1981 fixing the basic prices and the buying-in prices applicable in Greece to cauliflowers and apples

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to the 1979 Act of Accession, and in particular Article 60 (b), thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the Commission,

Having regard to the opinion of the European Parliament (1),

Whereas the producer prices for cauliflowers and apples, recorded in Greece during the reference period determined pursuant to Article 74 of the Act of Accession are, on average, higher than the prices in the Community of Nine ; whereas, in order to bring about a single market for the said products more rapidly, the common basic prices and buying-in prices for the said products should be applied in Greece with effect from accession, by virtue of Article 60 (b) of the said Act,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

With effect from 1 January 1981, the common basic prices and buying-in prices for cauliflowers and apples shall apply in Greece.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 1 January 1981.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 1 January 1981.

For the Council

The President

D.F. VAN DER MEI

(1) OJ No C 346, 31.12.1980.
(September 22, 1980)

#### Carol Arena, Petitioner, v Pat Ravo, as Manager of the City of Yonkers, et al., Respondents.

pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent Pat Ravo, as Manager of the City of Yonkers, which, after a hearing, found that petitioner had engaged in an illegal strike on June 26, 27 and 28, 1978. Determination confirmed and proceeding dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements. There is substantial evidence in the record to support the findings of the respondent Ravo (see *Mynarski v Ravo,*72 AD2d 741, mot for lv to app den 48 NY2d 611). Damiani, J. P., Gibbons, Rabin and Margett, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 808 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 808

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                          May 22, 2006.
Whereas national workforce professional organizations and the local workforce 
        investment boards will celebrate National One-Stop Month from May 1 to 
        31, 2006;
Whereas workforce investment boards and One-Stop delivery system were created 
        under the Workforce Investment Act of 1998 and are designed to provide a 
        full range of employment solutions to employers and job seekers in a 
        single location;
Whereas more than 600 workforce investment boards and 2,000 One-Stop Career 
        Centers are enhancing the productivity and competitiveness of the Nation 
        by providing workforce solutions for hundreds of thousands of employers 
        annually across the United States;
Whereas, in the spirit of the Workforce Investment Act, the cornerstones of 
        maximizing customer choice, employment and training solutions, and 
        universal access are the primary missions of the One-Stop delivery 
        system, allowing more than 14,000,000 job seekers annually the 
        opportunity to connect with the tools they need for their next career 
        opportunity;
Whereas each year the One-Stop delivery system and regional workforce investment 
        boards contribute to the competitiveness of the Nation's workforce by 
        providing training assistance through grants to job seekers and employed 
        workers and other programs to more than 400,000 Americans so they may 
        upgrade or acquire new skills; and
Whereas, in the spirit of the Workforce Investment Act, the private sector 
        leadership of the regional workforce investment boards provides the 
        planning, oversight, and accountability of workforce strategies that 
        succeed in communities across the country: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) supports the goals of National One-Stop Month; and
            (2) supports the efforts of the workforce investment boards and One-
        Stop delivery system in preparing the Nation's workforce.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
§ 950.32 Final determination on covered events. ( a ) If the parties reach a Final Determination on Covered Events through mediation, or Summary Binding Decision as set forth in this subpart, the Final Determination on Covered Events is a final settlement of the issue, made by the sponsor and the Program Administrator. The sponsor, and the Department, may rely on, and neither may challenge, the Final Determination on Covered Events in any future Certification of Covered Costs related to the covered event that was the subject of that Initial Determination.
( b ) The parties agree that no appeal shall be taken or further review sought, and that the Final Determination on Covered Events is final, conclusive, non-appealable and may not be set aside, except for fraud.
#### § 910.518 [Reserved]
| (logo)  WELLS FARGO | **Commercial  Mortgage Servicing**D1050-084,  8th Floor  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|---------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

Referenceis hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as ofFebruary 1, 2013, by and among GS Mortgage Securities Corporation II, asDepositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer andCertificate Administrator, LNR Partners, LLC, as Special Servicer, Trimont RealEstate Advisors, Inc., as Operating Advisor and U.S. Bank National Associationas Trustee, with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through CertificatesSeries 2013-GC10 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein nototherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuantto Section 10.07 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice Presidentof Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1.      Areview of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from January1, 2017 through December 31, 2017 (the “Reporting Period”), and of itsperformance per the Agreement during such period has been made under mysupervision, and

 

2.      To thebest of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilledall of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughoutthe Reporting Period.

 

 

INWITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28thday of February 2018.

 

 

/s/Daniel Bober

DanielBober

ExecutiveVice President

WellsFargo Bank

 

 

| Wells  Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo)  Together we’ll go far |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
§ 765.10 Eligibility for reimbursement. ( a ) Any licensee of an active uranium or thorium processing site that has incurred costs of remedial action for the site that are attributable to byproduct material generated as an incident of sales to the United States shall be eligible for reimbursement of these costs, subject to the procedures and limitations specified in this part.
( b ) Prior to reimbursement of costs of remedial action incurred by a licensee, the Department shall make a determination regarding the total quantity of dry short tons of byproduct material, and the quantity of Federal-related dry short tons of byproduct material present on October 24, 1992 at the licensee's active processing site. A claim for reimbursement from a site for which a determination is made will be evaluated individually. If a licensee does not concur with the Department's determination regarding the quantity of dry short tons of byproduct material present at the site, the licensee may appeal the Department's determination in accordance with § 765.22 of this part. The Department's determination shall be used to determine that portion of an approved claim for reimbursement submitted by the licensee which shall be reimbursed, unless or until the determination is overturned on appeal. If the outcome of an appeal requires a change in the Department's initial determination, the Department will adjust any payment previously made to the licensee to reflect the change.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Mendel Lowe, Appellant.

(1) Appeal by defendant from a judgment (Indictment No. 1792/78) of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered September 28, 1979, convicting him of two counts of robbery in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence and (2) purported appeal by defendant from a judgment (Indictment No. 359/79) of the same court, also rendered September 28, 1979, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon a plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. Judgment under Indictment No. 1792/78, affirmed. No opinion. Purported appeal from judgment under Indictment No. 359/79, dismissed. No notice of appeal has been filed. Mollen, P. J., Lazer, Cohalan and Margett, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 10.48



Summary of Compensation Arrangements for Certain Named Executive Officers



Set forth below is a summary of the compensation paid by MEMC Electronic
Materials, Inc. (the Company) to the five executive officers to be named in the Companys 2006 annual proxy statement who are not covered by current employment agreements, as of the date of filing of the Companys Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the Form 10-K). Each of these executive officers is an employee at will whose compensation and employment status may be changed at any time in the discretion of the Companys
Board of Directors.



Base Salaries. These executive
officers receive base salaries in the amounts indicated below:



|                                                                        |  |                        |        
|----------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------- | -------
|Name and Position                                                       |  | 2006 Base SalaryAmount
|Nabeel Gareeb, Chief Executive Officer and President                    |  | $                      | 610,000
|Thomas E. Linnen, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (1) |  | $                      | 250,000
|Shaker Sadasivam, Senior Vice President, Research and Development       |  | $                      | 315,000
|John A. Kauffmann, Senior Vice President, Sales and Marketing           |  | $                      | 300,000
|Sean Hunkler, Senior Vice President, Manufacturing                      |  | $                      | 350,000

---

|(1) | Mr. Linnen stepped aside as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer on April 27, 2006.
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



The Compensation Committee adjusts these base salaries from time to time as
the Committee deems appropriate, generally annually.



Incentive Awards. These executive officers are also eligible to participate in the Companys incentive compensation plans as provided in the terms of such plans. Such plans, and any forms of awards thereunder providing for
material terms, are included as exhibits to the Form 10-K.



Pension Plan. These executive officers are also eligible to participate in the MEMC Pension Plan on the same terms as the Companys other covered employees. Because they commenced employment after December 31, 2001,
Mr. Gareeb, Mr. Hunkler and Mr. Linnen are not covered by the MEMC Pension Plan.



Relocation Payments. From time to time the Company makes payments to executive officers to cover relocation expenses.
#### § 601.930 Debarring Official (Department of State supplement to government-wide definition at 2 CFR 180.930).

The Debarring Official for the Department of State is the Procurement Executive, Office of the Procurement Executive (A/OPE).
Robert and Patricia



# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

March 12, 2014

N o. 04

- 14

- 00083

- CV

Mike and Geri JONES,

Appellant s

v.

Robert and Patricia ZEARFOSS,

Appellee s

From the 25th Judicial District Court, Guadalupe County, Texas

Tria l Court No. 12

- 00986

- CV

- A

Honorable W.C. Kirkendall, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellant's motion for extension of time to file brief is hereby GRANTED. Appellant's

brief is due on or before May 12, 2014.

_________________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 12th day of March, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court