alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of Vincent J. De Cordova et al., Respondents, v. Nathan L. H. Bennett, as Town Clerk of the Town of Hempstead, et al., Appellants.

In a proceeding pursuant to article 78 of the CPLR to annul the appellant Town Board’s determination, rendered December 19, 1967, denying the separate applications of petitioners for tow car owners’ licenses, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered May 23, 1968, which granted the petitions herein and directed the appellant Town Clerk to issue such licenses to petitioners. Judgment reversed, on the law, without costs; determination confirmed; and proceeding dismissed on the merits. No questions of fact were considered. Under the amendment to Ordinance No. 40 which became effective pending this appeal, petitioners are ineligible for the relief granted to them at Special Term by reason of their lack of a place of business within the confines of the Town of Hempstead. Since petitioners’ right to the licenses sought did not vest and this appeal must be decided on the law as it now exists *(Arcelo Reproduction Co.*v. *Modugno,*31 A D 2d 642), the judgment under review may not stand. Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, Rabin, Hopkins and Benjamin, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Herbert B. Grimes, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the annual report of Vaughan Foods, Inc., on Form 10-K for the annual report period ended December 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in such Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Vaughan Foods, Inc. Date: March 30, 2011/s/ Herbert B. GrimesHerbert B. GrimesChairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)


I, Gene P. Jones, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the annual report of Vaughan Foods, Inc., on Form 10-K for the annual report period ended December 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in such Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Vaughan Foods, Inc.


Date: March 30, 2011/s/ Gene JonesGene JonesChief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to Vaughan Foods, Inc. and will be retained by Vaughan Foods, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. This certification “accompanies” the Form 10-K to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-K), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-6957

TONNIE L. NORTHAM,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; ATTORNEY

GENERAL OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior

District Judge. (1:05-cv-01504-CMH)

Submitted: October 31, 2006 Decided: December 18, 2006

Before NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tonnie L. Northam, Appellant Pro Se. Paul Christopher Galanides,

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Tonnie L. Northam seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. The

order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A

certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial

showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any

assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is

debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by

the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell,

537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484

(2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Northam has not

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 843 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 843

 Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the United 
  States should seek to achieve complete energy independence by 2015.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 25, 2006

 Mrs. Drake submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                  the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the United 
  States should seek to achieve complete energy independence by 2015.

Whereas all Americans have the right to affordable energy;
Whereas, for too long, the United States has failed to develop its own natural 
        resources and to encourage the innovative spirit necessary to achieve 
        energy independence;
Whereas, by operating a 21st Century economy through an energy infrastructure 
        built in the 1970's, the United States has made itself vulnerable to 
        rogue nations, dictators, and a commodities market that is sensitive to 
        global political and natural events; and
Whereas the 109th Congress took decisive action to begin to restore our 
        infrastructure after decades of neglect by passing the Energy Policy Act 
        of 2005, but more must be done: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved,  That it is the sense of the House of Representatives 
that the United States should seek to achieve complete energy 
independence by 2015, by--
            (1) investing in the production infrastructure necessary to 
        increase the use of renewable and alternative fuels;
            (2) exploring and producing more American natural 
        resources;
            (3) increasing the number of domestic refineries;
            (4) revising and streamlining the permitting process for 
        constructing and operating energy production facilities;
            (5) promoting small businesses and entrepreneurs to further 
        develop the use of renewable and alternative energy;
            (6) encouraging gasoline servicing stations to become 
        capable of supplying new sources of energy for automobiles;
            (7) furthering the proliferation of fuel efficient 
        vehicles;
            (8) improving the energy efficiency of Federal, State, and 
        local government facilities and promoting energy conservation 
        in the private sector;
            (9) enabling businesses and homeowners to produce their own 
        electricity and sell the abundance back to the grid; and
            (10) engaging the bright minds in academia to further 
        explore research and development into new technologies and uses 
        of renewable and alternative fuels.
                                 <all>
```
Nebraska Court of Appeals Memorandum Opinions

NOT Selected for Posting to Court Website

(released the week prior to August 17, 2021)

The following memorandum opinions were filed by the Nebraska Court of 

Appeals and can be viewed using SSCALES:

A-20-881 Jensen v. Murcek

The above-listed memorandum opinions can be viewed online through the 

appellate court case search available by subscription through Nebraska.gov:

http://www.nebraska.gov/subscriber/.

Current subscribers to Nebraska.gov can search appellate court cases here:

https://www.nebraska.gov/courts/sccales/.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 830 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 830

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                          May 23, 2006.
    Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker 
may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XVIII, declare the House resolved into the 
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of the 
bill (H.R. 5384) making appropriations for Agriculture, Rural Development, Food 
and Drug Administration, and Related Agencies for the fiscal year ending 
September 30, 2007, and for other purposes. The first reading of the bill shall 
be dispensed with. All points of order against consideration of the bill are 
waived. General debate shall be confined to the bill and shall not exceed one 
hour equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member 
of the Committee on Appropriations. After general debate the bill shall be 
considered for amendment under the five-minute rule. Points of order against 
provisions in the bill for failure to comply with clause 2 of rule XXI are 
waived except for sections 749, 751, and 752. During consideration of the bill 
for amendment, the Chairman of the Committee of the Whole may accord priority in 
recognition on the basis of whether the Member offering an amendment has caused 
it to be printed in the portion of the Congressional Record designated for that 
purpose in clause 8 of rule XVIII. Amendments so printed shall be considered as 
read. When the committee rises and reports the bill back to the House with a 
recommendation that the bill do pass, the previous question shall be considered 
as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to final passage without 
intervening motion except one motion to recommit with or without instructions.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
IV 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 550 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives regarding the importance of maintaining the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) 

forum as the preeminent multilateral institution in the Asia-Pacific region. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 10, 2005 

Mr. KIRK (for himself, Mr. LARSEN of Washington, Mr. MANZULLO, Mr. 

BURTON of Indiana, Mr. CROWLEY, Mr. KENNEDY of Minnesota, Mr. 

SMITH of Washington, and Mr. WILSON of South Carolina) submitted the 

following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on International Relations 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives regarding the importance of maintaining the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) forum as the preeminent 

multilateral institution in the Asia-Pacific region. 

Whereas the Asia-Pacific region accounts for 40 percent of 

the world’s population, more than half of world trade, 

and 60 percent of global gross domestic product; 

Whereas the growth of the Asia-Pacific region has created 

millions of new jobs in the United States; 
2 

•HRES 550 IH 

Whereas United States businesses in the Asia-Pacifc region 

face obstacles to doing business in the region, in part due 

to a rise in discriminatory regulations and standards; 

Whereas the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) was 

established as a forum for the United States to address 

business concerns in the region; 

Whereas success in APEC contributes directly to keeping the 

United States at the forefront of the global marketplace 

by strongly supporting current World Trade Organization 

(WTO) negotiations, developing model measures for high 

quality free trade agreements, sensible regulations and 

standards, and streamlining the movement of goods 

across borders by its members; and 

Whereas the upcoming APEC Leaders’ Meeting in Busan, 

Korea is an important opportunity to demonstrate to the 

world the commitment of the United States to improving 

prosperity and security in the Asia-Pacific region: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that— 

3 (1) the continuing success of the Asia-Pacific 

4 Economic Cooperation (APEC) is in the national in5 terest of the United States because APEC is the 

6 only multilateral institution in the Asia-Pacific re7 gion that includes the United States; and 

8 (2) APEC should remain at the center of 

9 United States diplomacy in the Asia-Pacific region. 

Æ
- Home
- Data Products
- County-level Data Sets
- Population
Editorial Note on Part 180
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 180 appear at 79 FR 75879, Dec. 19, 2014.

§ 180.130 How does an exclusion restrict a person's involvement in covered transactions? With the exceptions stated in §§ 180.135, 315, and 420, a person who is excluded by any Federal agency may not: ( a ) Be a participant in a Federal agency transaction that is a covered transaction; or
( b ) Act as a principal of a person participating in one of those covered transactions.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-30176

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

MICHAEL DABOVAL BESSE, JR.,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 6:08-CR-153-1

Before SMITH, PRADO, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

*

The attorney appointed to represent Michael Daboval Besse, Jr., has

moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Besse has not filed a response. Our

independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous

issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

April 20, 2010

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 09-30176 Document: 00511085707 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/20/2010
#### § 76.81 Authorized use of radioactive material.

Unless otherwise authorized by law, the Corporation shall confine its possession and use of radioactive material to the locations and purposes covered by the certificate and/or approved compliance plan. Except as otherwise provided, the certificate or approved compliance plan issued pursuant to the requirements in this part entitles the Corporation to receive title to, own, acquire, receive, possess, and use radioactive material in accordance with the certificate.
###### Editorial Note on Part 725

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 725 appear at 88 FR 41292, June 26, 2023.

#### § 725.26 Assignment.

An access permit is nontransferable and nonassignable.
```

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 249 (Wednesday, December 29, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 82029-82030]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-32773]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION

[GSA Bulletin FTR 11-03; Docket 2010-0003; Sequence 6]

Privately Owned Vehicle Mileage Reimbursement Rates

AGENCY: Office of Governmentwide Policy (OGP), General Services 
Administration (GSA).

ACTION: Notice of FTR Bulletin 11-03, Calendar Year (CY) 2011 Privately 
Owned Vehicle Mileage Reimbursement Rates.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The General Services Administration's (GSA) annual privately 
owned vehicle (POV) mileage reimbursement rate reviews have resulted in 
new CY 2011 rates for the use of privately owned automobiles (POA), 
POAs when Government owned automobiles (GOA) are authorized, and 
motorcycles for official purposes. No change resulted for the use of 
privately owned airplanes. FTR Bulletin 11-03 establishes these new CY 
2011 mileage reimbursement rates, pursuant to the process discussed 
below. This notice of subject bulletin is the only notification of 
revisions to the POV rates to agencies other than the changes posted on 
the GSA website. GSA determines these rates by reviewing the annual 
standard automobile study conducted by the Internal Revenue Service, as 
well as conducting motorcycle and aircraft studies, and/or by applying 
consumer price index data.

DATES: This notice is effective upon the date of publication and 
applies to travel performed on or after January 1, 2011, through 
December 31, 2011.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For clarification of content, please 
contact Mr. Cy Greenidge, Office of Governmentwide Policy, Office of 
Travel, Transportation, and Asset Management, at (202) 219-2349, or by 
e-mail at [email protected]. Please cite Notice of FTR Bulletin 11-
03.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Change in Standard Procedure

    GSA posts the POV mileage reimbursement rates, formerly published 
in 41 CFR Chapter 301, solely

[[Page 82030]]

on the Internet at http://www.gsa.gov/ftr. This process, implemented in 
FTR Amendment 2010-07 (75 FR 72965, Nov. 29, 2010), ensures more timely 
updates in mileage reimbursement rates by GSA for Federal employees on 
official travel. Notices published periodically in the Federal 
Register, such as this one, and the changes posted on the GSA Web site, 
now constitute the only notification of revisions to privately owned 
vehicle reimbursement rates for Federal agencies.

    Dated: December 21, 2010.
Janet Dobbs,
Acting Deputy Associate Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2010-32773 Filed 12-28-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-14-P
```
###### Editorial Note on Part 51

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 51 appear at 80 FR 74980, Dec. 1, 2015.

#### § 51.61 Environmental report—independent spent fuel storage installation (ISFSI) or monitored retrievable storage installation (MRS) license.

Each applicant for issuance of a license for storage of spent fuel in an independent spent fuel storage installation (ISFSI) or for the storage of spent fuel and high-level radioactive waste in a monitored retrievable storage installation (MRS) pursuant to part 72 of this chapter shall submit with its application to: ATTN: Document Control Desk, Director, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards, a separate document entitled “Applicant's Environmental Report—ISFSI License” or “Applicant's Environmental Report—MRS License,” as appropriate. If the applicant is the U.S. Department of Energy, the environmental report may be in the form of either an environmental impact statement or an environmental assessment, as appropriate. The environmental report shall contain the information specified in § 51.45 and shall address the siting evaluation factors contained in subpart E of part 72 of this chapter. As stated in § 51.23, no discussion of the environmental impacts of the continued storage of spent fuel in an ISFSI is required in this report.

[79 FR 56261, Sept. 19, 2014]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          96,139
<SECURITIES>                                       400
<RECEIVABLES>                                   26,168
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               122,707
<PP&E>                                       3,011,349
<DEPRECIATION>                                 843,483
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,290,573
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,382
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,148,238
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,290,573
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                72,966
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   44,980
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 27,986
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             27,986
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    27,986
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.17
        

</TABLE>
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA 

FIFTH DISTRICT 

 

 NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

 FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

 DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED 

 

DENISE COLLINS, 

 Appellant, 

v. Case No. 5D15-1885 

DWAYNE COLLINS, SR., 

 Appellee. 

________________________________/ 

Opinion filed April 1, 2016 

Appeal from the Circuit Court 

for Lake County, 

Mark J. Hill, Judge. 

Brandon M. Tyson, of Tyson Law Firm, 

LLC, Altamonte Springs, for Appellant. 

Paul W. Darby and Thomas Holden, of 

Holden & Darby, P.A., Tavares, for 

Appellee. 

PER CURIAM. 

Denise Collins appeals a final judgment of dissolution of marriage that provided, 

inter alia, for her former husband to have sole parental responsibility on decisions 

relating to the parties’ minor children’s education and medical care. Although we 

conclude that the trial court’s factual findings support its decision, we remand the case 

because the final judgment failed to include a specific finding that shared parental 
2

responsibility would be detrimental to the children. See Henderson v. Henderson, 162 

So. 3d 203, 207 (Fla. 5th DCA 2015). The final judgment is otherwise affirmed. 

 AFFIRMED, IN PART; REVERSED, IN PART; REMANDED. 

ORFINGER, EVANDER and COHEN, JJ., concur.