alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| ***USDA    Rural Utilities Service    Electric Program****Boxscores***
[ Main Menu ][ Loans/Rates ][ Service ][ Contacts ][ Regulations ][ Bulletins ][ Engineering ][ Forms ][ List of Materials ][ Exit/Links ]  
 
RUS ELECTRIC PROGRAM BOX SCORESFiscal Year 2000 - As of July 31, 2000**Insured Loans**
 
 **Pending:**
 
    Hardship Loans 30 Applications:$254,094,000  Municipal Rate Loans 144 Applications:$859,277,000**Hardship Loans**
 
 *  Approved this Fiscal Year:*
* *

*24 Loans:**$109,006,000*  FY Loan Authority: 
   $121,666,666         Remaining:             $12,660,666**Municipal Rate Loans**
 
 *  Approved this Fiscal Year:*
* **22 Loans:**$**291,981,000*  FY Loan Authority:
$294,332,425Remaining:             $2,351,425
**Guaranteed Loans****Pending:**33 Applications:$1,347,412,756*Approved This Fiscal Year:**66 Loans:**$1090866000*  FY Loan Authority: $1,700,000,000         Remaining:            $609,134,000
**FFB Loans Repriced/Refinanced  (FY 2000)**$9,043,531
*Last updated 08/02/2000* |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
#### § 200.323 Procurement of recovered materials.

A non-Federal entity that is a state agency or agency of a political subdivision of a state and its contractors must comply with section 6002 of the Solid Waste Disposal Act, as amended by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act. The requirements of Section 6002 include procuring only items designated in guidelines of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) at 40 CFR part 247 that contain the highest percentage of recovered materials practicable, consistent with maintaining a satisfactory level of competition, where the purchase price of the item exceeds $10,000 or the value of the quantity acquired during the preceding fiscal year exceeded $10,000; procuring solid waste management services in a manner that maximizes energy and resource recovery; and establishing an affirmative procurement program for procurement of recovered materials identified in the EPA guidelines.
§ 1.1440 What process will FDA follow when waiving a requirement of this subpart on our own initiative? ( a ) If FDA, on our own initiative, determines that a waiver of one or more requirements for an individual entity or type of entity is appropriate, we will publish a notice in the Federal Register setting forth the proposed waiver and the reasons for such waiver. The notice will establish a public docket so that interested persons may submit written comments on the proposal.
( b ) After considering any comments timely submitted, we will publish a notice in the Federal Register stating whether we are granting the waiver (in whole or in part) and the reasons for our decision.
( c ) Any waiver for a type of entity that FDA grants will become effective on the date that notice of the waiver is published in the Federal Register, unless otherwise stated in the notice.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 63 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 63

  Congratulating the James Madison University Dukes football team for 
   their outstanding and historic victory in the National Collegiate 
         Athletic Association Division I-AA Championship Game.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 2, 2005

   Mr. Goodlatte (for himself, Mr. Goode, Mr. Boucher, Mr. Wolf, Mr. 
 Cantor, Mr. Tom Davis of Virginia, Mr. Moran of Virginia, Mrs. Jo Ann 
 Davis of Virginia, Mrs. Drake, Mr. Scott of Virginia, and Mr. Forbes) 
submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee 
                     on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Congratulating the James Madison University Dukes football team for 
   their outstanding and historic victory in the National Collegiate 
         Athletic Association Division I-AA Championship Game.

Whereas, on December 17, 2004, the James Madison University Dukes football team 
        (``Dukes'') won the National Collegiate Athletic Association (``NCAA'') 
        Division I-AA Football Championship Game;
Whereas the Dukes defeated the University of Montana, with a final score of 31-
        21, before 16,771 fans and a national television audience in the 
        Division I-AA Championship Game at Finley Stadium, University of 
        Tennessee-Chattanooga;
Whereas the Dukes' victory resulted in James Madison University's first national 
        championship in a team sport since the 1994 Women's Field Hockey NCAA 
        Championship;
Whereas the Dukes defeated Lehigh, Furman, and the College of William and Mary 
        to advance and win the 2004 National Championship and become the first 
        team to win four straight road games in Division I-AA postseason 
        history; and
Whereas at James Madison University, President Dr. Linwood Rose, Athletic 
        Director Jeff Bourne, Head Coach Mickey Matthews, Offensive Coordinator 
        Jeff Durden, and Defensive Coordinator George Barlow collectively led 
        the Dukes to a record victory: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved,  That the House of Representatives congratulates the 
James Madison University Dukes football team for their outstanding and 
historic victory in the National Collegiate Athletic Association 
Division I-AA Championship Game.
                                 <all>
```
# EUR-Lex - 31992D0216 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31992D0216

**92/216/EEC: Commission Decision of 26 March 1992 on the collection of data concerning competitions for equidae as referred to in Article 4 (2) of Council Directive 90/428/EEC **

*
Official Journal L 104 , 22/04/1992 P. 0077 - 0077 Finnish special edition: Chapter 3 Volume 41 P. 0235 Swedish special edition: Chapter 3 Volume 41 P. 0235 *

COMMISSION DECISION of 26 March 1992 on the collection of data concerning competitions for equidae as referred to in Article 4 (2) of Council Directive 90/428/EEC (92/216/EEC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community,

Having regard to Council Directive 90/428/EEC of 26 June 1990 on trade in equidae intended for competitions and laying down the conditions for participation therein (1), and in particular Article 4 (3) thereof,

Whereas it is the responsibility of each Member State to inform the Commission of the use of the possibilities offered by the first indent of Article 4 (2) of Directive 90/428/EEC and to inform the Commission and the other Member States of the criteria for the distribution of funds provided for in the second indent of the said Article 4 (2);

Whereas under the rules for applying Article 4 of Directive 90/428/EEC each Member State should first designate a coordinating authority responsible for collecting the necessary data;

Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on Zootechnics,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

1. Each Member State shall appoint a coordinating authority responsible for collecting the data concerning:

- competitions as referred to in the first indent of Article 4 (2) of Directive 90/428/EEC organized in its territory,

- the criteria for the distribution of funds provided for in the third subparagraph of the second indent of the said Article 4 (2).

2. Each Member State shall communicate to the Commission the name and address of the coordinating authority appointed in accordance with paragraph 1. On the basis of these communications, the Commission shall draw up a list of the coordinating authorities. It shall publish the list in the Official Journal of the European Communities, C series.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Member States. Done at Brussels, 26 March 1992. For the Commission

Ray MAC SHARRY

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ No L 224, 18. 8. 1990, p. 60.
89–1008

106TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 2d Session 106–1008

WAIVING POINTS OF ORDER AGAINST THE CONFERENCE

REPORT TO ACCOMPANY H.R. 4942, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA APPROPRIATIONS ACT, 2001

OCTOBER 26 (legislative day, OCTOBER 25), 2000.—Referred to the House Calendar

and ordered to be printed

Mr. LINDER, from the Committee on Rules,

submitted the following

REPORT

[To accompany H. Res. 653]

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House

Resolution 653, by a non-record vote, report the same to the House

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted.

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution waives all points of order against the conference

report to accompany H.R. 4942, the District of Columbia Appropriations Act, 2001, and against its consideration. The rule further provides that the conference report shall be considered as read.

Æ
# EUR-Lex - 31993L0087 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31993L0087

**Commission Directive 93/87/EEC of 22 October 1993 amending Directive 90/377/EEC with regard to the survey locations and regions in the Federal Republic of Germany **

*
Official Journal L 277 , 10/11/1993 P. 0032 - 0032 Finnish special edition: Chapter 12 Volume 2 P. 0171 Swedish special edition: Chapter 12 Volume 2 P. 0171 *

COMMISSION DIRECTIVE 93/87/EEC of 22 October 1993 amending Directive 90/377/EEC with regard to the survey locations and regions in the Federal Republic of Germany

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community,

Having regard to Council Directive 90/377/EEC of 29 June 1990 concerning a Community procedure to improve the transparency of gas and electricity prices charged to industrial end-users (1),

Having regard to Council Directive 90/653/EEC of 4 December 1990 laying down amendments for the purpose of implementing in Germany certain Community Directives relating to statistics on the carriage of goods and statistics on gas and electricity prices (2),

Whereas Germany has defined the locations in the territory of the former German Democratic Republic in order to extend the breakdown by region and location for statistics on gas and electricity prices;

Whereas the Advisory Committee established by Article 7 of Council Directive 90/377/EEC has been consulted on the measures laid down in the present Directive,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DIRECTIVE:

Article 1

The Annexes to Directive 90/377/EEC shall be amended in order to add the following locations and regions for the collection of gas and electricity prices in the Federal Republic of Germany:

(a) in Annex I, point 11 - Federal Republic of Germany:

- 'Dresden and Berlin';

(b) in Annex II, point 2 - Federal Republic of Germany:

- 'Erfurt, Leipzig and Rostock';

(c) in Annex II, point 13 - Federal Republic of Germany:

- 'East';

(d) footnote 2 to Annex II, point 13 shall be replaced by the following:

'The Laender will be divided into four zones, namely:

- North/Central: Schleswig-Holstein, Hamburg, Bremen, Berlin, Lower Saxony, North Hessen,

- West: North-Rhine-Westphalia, Rineland-Palatinate, South Hessen, Saarland,

- South: Baden-Wurttemberg, Bavaria,

- East: all the Laender not included in the other regions.'

Article 2

This Directive is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 22 October 1993.

For the Commission

Henning CHRISTOPHERSEN

Vice-President

(1) OJ No L 185, 17. 7. 1990, p. 16.

(2) OJ No L 353, 17. 12. 1990, p. 46.
#### Flushing National Bank, Respondent, v. Carat Contracting Company, Inc., et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

In an action, *inter alia,*to recover on written guarantees of a promissory note, the appeal is from an order of the *869Supreme Court, Queens County, dated April 14,1980, which denied the motion of appellants (except Carat Contracting Company) for summary judgment on the second cause of action. Appeal by defendant Carat Contracting Company dismissed, without costs or disbursements. Said defendant was not aggrieved by the order under review (see CPLR 5511). As to defendants Mildred Durante, individually and as administratrix, Frank and Alice Castiglione and Joseph and Miriam Maiello, order affirmed, without costs or disbursements, on condition that plaintiff serve upon said defendants copies of the promissory note and written guarantees within 10 days after service upon it of a copy of the order to be made hereon, together with notice of entry thereof. In the event the condition is not complied with, then order reversed, on the law, with $50 costs and disbursements, and motion granted. In serving its bill of particulars, plaintiff should have served copies of the promissory note and guarantees. Hopkins, J. P., Damiani, Titone and O’Connor, JJ., concur.
# EUR-Lex - 31993D0355 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31993D0355

**93/355/EEC: Council Decision of 8 June 1993 concerning the conclusion of a Memorandum of understanding on certain oil seeds between the European Economic Community and the United States of America within the framework of the GATT **

*
Official Journal L 147 , 18/06/1993 P. 0025 - 0025 Finnish special edition: Chapter 3 Volume 50 P. 0030 Swedish special edition: Chapter 3 Volume 50 P. 0030 *

COUNCIL DECISION of 8 June 1993 concerning the conclusion of a Memorandum of understanding on certain oil seeds between the European Economic Community and the United States of America within the framework of the GATT

(93/355/EEC)THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community, and in particular Article 113 thereof,

Having regard to the recommendation from the Commission,

Whereas a GATT panel found that a consequence of the Community's support scheme for oil seeds was an impairment of the value of the tariff concession which the Community had granted to the United States in 1962;

Whereas the GATT panel consequently recommended that the Community should act quickly to eliminate this impairment;

Whereas a mutually satisfactory agreement was reached in the negotiations initiated with the United States of America and took the form of a Memorandum of Understanding;

Whereas this Memorandum of Understanding should be quickly given effect, so that the deadlines contained therein can be met,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The Memorandum of Understanding between the European Economic Community and the United States of America on oil seeds in the framework of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade is hereby approved on behalf of the European Economic Community.

The text of the said Memorandum is attached to this Decision.

Article 2

The President of the Council is hereby authorized to designate the person empowered to sign the Memorandum of Understanding in order to bind the Community.

This Decision shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

Done at Luxembourg, 8 June 1993.

For the Council

The President

N. HELVEG PETERSEN

ANNEX

EC-12 oil seed separate base area system (1) (Soya beans, rape and colza seeds and sunflower seeds)

/* Tables: see OJ */

(1) Figures to be reduced to reflect the annual set aside rate for arable crops.

(2) The term 1994/95 refers to the Community marketing year, i.e. oil seeds (both winter and spring sown) for harvest in 1994.

(3) It is understood that, should the membership of the Community be expanded, this Agreement will be amended to reflect an increase in the separate base area in an amount no more than the average level of production area of the acceding member in the three years immediately preceding such accession.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1185 Reported in House (RH)]

<DOC>

                                                 House Calendar No. 201
115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1185

                         [Report No. 115-1103]

Providing for consideration of the bill (S. 2322) to amend the Federal 
    Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to define the term natural cheese.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 21, 2018

   Mr. Newhouse, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Providing for consideration of the bill (S. 2322) to amend the Federal 
    Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to define the term natural cheese.

    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order to consider in the House the bill (S. 2322) to amend the Federal 
Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to define the term natural cheese. All 
points of order against consideration of the bill are waived. The bill 
shall be considered as read. All points of order against provisions in 
the bill are waived. The previous question shall be considered as 
ordered on the bill and on any amendment thereto to final passage 
without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate equally 
divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of the 
Committee on Energy and Commerce; and (2) one motion to commit.
                                                 House Calendar No. 201

115th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                              H. RES. 1185

                         [Report No. 115-1103]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the bill (S. 2322) to amend the Federal 
    Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to define the term natural cheese.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           December 21, 2018

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
#### § 52.143 Staff approval of design.

Upon completion of its review of a submittal under this subpart and receipt of a report by the Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards under § 52.141 of this subpart, the NRC staff shall publish a determination in the Federal Register as to whether or not the design is acceptable, subject to appropriate terms and conditions, and make an analysis of the design in the form of a report available at the NRC Web site, *http://www.nrc.gov.*
§ 1128.600 Purpose of FMS Article VI. FMS Article VI sets forth requirements concerning recipients' cost sharing or matching under awards. It thereby implements OMB guidance in: ( a ) 2 CFR 200.306 and 200.308(c)(1)(vii); and
( b ) 2 CFR 200.434, in conjunction with FMS Article III in appendix C to this part.
§ 708.36 Remedies. ( a ) *General remedies.* If the initial or final agency decision determines that an act of retaliation has occurred, it may order: ( 1 ) Reinstatement;
( 2 ) Transfer preference;
( 3 ) Back pay;
( 4 ) Reimbursement of the complainant's reasonable costs and expenses, including attorney and expert-witness fees reasonably incurred to prepare for and participate in proceedings leading to the initial or final agency decision; or
( 5 ) Such other remedies as are deemed necessary to abate the violation and provide the complainant with relief.
( b ) *Interim relief.* If an initial agency decision contains a determination that an act of retaliation occurred, the decision may order the employer to provide the complainant with appropriate interim relief (including reinstatement) pending the outcome of any request for review of the decision by the OHA Director. Such interim relief will not include payment of any money.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                      19,589,403
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,458,058
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,315,325
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            28,202,645
<PP&E>                                     206,094,877
<DEPRECIATION>                              56,379,310
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             235,135,231
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       80,606,955
<BONDS>                                    146,055,438
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                 21,606,686
<COMMON>                                        61,954
<OTHER-SE>                                (13,108,028)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               235,135,231
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            84,869,413
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               47,950,423
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            30,513,355
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          18,791,234
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (12,385,599)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (12,385,599)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (12,385,599)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.18
        

</TABLE>