alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Greyhound Lines, Inc. and Subsidiaries (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned officers of the
Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to such officers knowledge:  1.
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and result of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the
periods expressed in the Report. Date: May 16, 2005 /s/ Stephen E. GormanName:Title:
    Stephen E. Gorman
President and Chief Executive Officer /s/ Cheryl W. FarmerName:Title:
    Cheryl W. Farmer 
Senior Vice President  Finance and Treasurer A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request. The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not
being filed as a part of this report or on a separate disclosure document.
§ 910.521 Management decision. ( a ) *General.* The management decision must clearly state whether or not the audit finding is sustained, the reasons for the decision, and the expected auditee action to repay disallowed costs, make financial adjustments, or take other action. If the auditee has not completed corrective action, a timetable for follow-up should be given. Prior to issuing the management decision, the Federal agency may request additional information or documentation from the auditee, including a request for auditor assurance related to the documentation, as a way of mitigating disallowed costs. The management decision should describe any appeal process available to the auditee. While not required, DOE agency may also issue a management decision on findings relating to the financial statements (if they were available) which are required to be reported in accordance with GAGAS.
( b ) As provided in § 910.513 Responsibilities, paragraph (c)(3), DOE is responsible for issuing a management decision for findings that relate to DOE awards it makes to for-profit entities.
( c ) Not applicable.
( d ) *Time requirements.* DOE must issue a management decision within six months of acceptance of the audit report. The auditee must initiate and proceed with corrective action as rapidly as possible and corrective action should begin no later than upon receipt of the audit report.
( e ) *Reference numbers.* Management decisions must include the reference numbers the auditor assigned to each audit finding in accordance with § 910.516 Audit findings paragraph (c).
# EUR-Lex - 31991A0223 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31991A0223

**91/223/EEC: Commission opinion of 2 April 1991 addressed to the Spanish government concerning the implementation of Council Directive 79/116/EEC concerning minimum requirements for certain tankers entering or leaving Community ports, and Council Directive 79/1034/EEC amending Council Directive 79/116/EEC **

*
Official Journal L 098 , 19/04/1991 P. 0021 - 0021 *

COMMISSION OPINION of 2 April 1991 addressed to the Spanish Government concerning the implementation of Council Directive 79/116/EEC concerning minimum requirements for certain tankers entering or leaving Community ports, and Council Directive 79/1034/EEC amending Council Directive 79/116/EEC (91/223/EEC)

1. By letter of 13 March 1990, the Office of the Permanent Representative of Spain to the European Communities forwarded to the Commission pursuant to Article 3 of both of these Directives (1) (2), Real Decreto No 145/89 of 20 January 1990 and the Orden of 8 February 1990, together with the correction thereto, concerning the minimum requirements for certain tankers entering or leaving Spanish ports.

2. The Commission must point out that, despite its obligations under Article 3 of both Directives, the Spanish Government submitted the text of the Real Decreto and the Orden to the Commission for consultation after they had been adopted and not, as provided for in the Directives, before they were adopted.

3. Examination of the measures has enabled the Commission to ascertain that the Spanish Government has complied fully with the Directives concerned. The Commission is therefore delivering a favourable opinion.

Done at Brussels, 2 April 1991.

For the Commission

Karel VAN MIERT

Member of the Commission (1) OJ No L 33, 8. 2. 1979, p. 33. (2) OJ No L 315, 11. 12. 1979, p. 16.
§ 1326.970 Nonprocurement transaction (Department of Commerce supplement to government-wide definition at 2 CFR 180.970). For purposes of the Department of Commerce, nonprocurement transaction includes the following: ( a ) Joint project Agreements under 15 U.S.C. 1525.
( b ) Cooperative research and development agreements.
( c ) Joint statistical agreements.
( d ) Patent licenses under 35 U.S.C. 207.
( e ) NTIS joint ventures, 15 U.S.C. 3704b.
##### 



Exhibit 99.3

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18,
UNITED STATES CODE)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Del Taco Income Properties IV (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each
of the undersigned officers of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



|Date: November 14, 2002 | /s/ Kevin K. Moriarty
Kevin K. Moriarty
Director, Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer
|----------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Date: November 14, 2002 | /s/ Robert J. Terrano
Robert J. Terrano
Executive Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer
|----------------------- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3289 

To suspend temporarily the duty on electric knives. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 26, 2006 

Mr. ALLEN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on electric knives. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ELECTRIC KNIVES. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.85.12 Electric knives (provided for in subheading 8509.80.00) ................................ Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
2 

•S 3289 IS 

1 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

2 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
#### § 417.500 What is the purpose of the System for Award Management Exclusions (SAM Exclusions)?

SAM Exclusions is a widely available source of the most current information about persons who are excluded or disqualified from covered transactions.
Editorial Note on Part 180
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 180 appear at 79 FR 75879, Dec. 19, 2014.

§ 180.1020 Voluntary exclusion or voluntarily excluded. ( a ) *Voluntary exclusion* means a person's agreement to be excluded under the terms of a settlement between the person and one or more agencies. Voluntary exclusion must have governmentwide effect.
( b ) *Voluntarily excluded* means the status of a person who has agreed to a voluntary exclusion.
#### § 1201.106 DOT Component implementation.

The specific requirements and responsibilities for grant-making DOT Components are set forth in this part. DOT Components must implement the language in this part unless different provisions are required by Federal statute or are approved by DOT Headquarters. DOT Components making Federal awards to non-Federal entities must implement the language in the Subpart C—Pre-Federal Award Requirements and Contents of Federal Awards of this Part through Subpart F—Audit Requirements of this Part in codified regulations unless different provisions are required by Federal statute or are approved by DOT Headquarters.
Exhibit
      10.1

    


    COMPENSATION
      ARRANGEMENT FOR LLOYD L. BEATTY, JR.

    


    Shore
      Bancshares, Inc. (the “Company”) and Lloyd L. Beatty, Jr., the Company’s Chief
      Operating Officer, are not party to a written employment agreement. Mr. Beatty’s
      employment arrangement provides for an annual salary of $215,000, subject to
      annual adjustment. Mr. Beatty is also entitled to participate in the Company’s
      bonus program, profit sharing and 401(k) plan, and group term life insurance
      program, to the extent the provisions and rules of those plans and programs
      permit such participation.
IV 

House Calendar No. 73 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 437 

[Report No. 115–269] 

Of inquiry requesting the President to provide certain documents in the 

President’s possession. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 12, 2017 

Mr. DEFAZIO (for himself and Mr. JOHNSON of Georgia) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation 

and Infrastructure 

JULY 28, 2017 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

RESOLUTION 

Of inquiry requesting the President to provide certain 

documents in the President’s possession. 

1 Resolved, That the President is requested to transmit 

2 (in a manner appropriate to classified information, if the 

3 President determines appropriate), to the House of Rep4 resentatives, not later than 14 days after the date of the 

5 adoption of this resolution, copies of any document, 


asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 437 RH 

1 record, memo, correspondence, or other communication in 

2 the possession of the Administrator of the General Serv3 ices Administration or the Acting Administrator of such 

4 Administration, or any portion of any such communica5 tion, that refers or relates to the following: 

6 (1) Guidance or direction to the Acting Admin7 istrator or to other staff of the General Services Ad8 ministration regarding responses to requests for in9 formation from Members of Congress and Ranking 

10 Members of Committees. 

11 (2) Ground lease No. GS-LS-11-11307, the 

12 lease agreement between the Trump Old Post Office 

13 LLC and the Government, including all books, 

14 records, annual statements, monthly statements, an15 nual budgets, detailed statements of the outstanding 

16 equity held by each member of the Trump Old Post 

17 Office LLC leasehold mortgage agreements, mez18 zanine lender agreements, notices, lease status re19 ports, and claims. 

20 (3) Legal memoranda or opinions generated by 

21 the Government related to ground lease No. GS-LS22 11-11307 between the Trump Old Post Office LLC 

23 and the Government. 


asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with BILLS

asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with BILLS
House Calendar No. 73 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 437 

[Report No. 115–269] 

RESOLUTION 

Of inquiry requesting the President to provide 

certain documents in the President’s possession. 

JULY 28, 2017 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 


asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with BILLS
2007-2313.

#### In re Roberson Children.

Stark App. No. 2007CA0067. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal and a claimed appeal of right. Upon review of the appeal it appears that the case involves the termination of parental rights. Accordingly,

It is ordered by the court, sua sponte, that this case shall proceed according to the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court of Ohio that pertain to the termination of parental rights or adoption of a minor child. Therefore, pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. III(2)(A), appellee’s memorandum in response shall be filed no later than 20 days from the date of this entry.
|ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE of PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION d/b/a MIDLAND LOAN SERVICES
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Pursuant to the requirements
of the applicable Servicing Agreement for the transactions listed on
Schedule I hereto, the undersigned, Steven W. Smith, as Executive Vice
President of Midland Loan Services, a division of PNC Bank, National
Association, hereby certifies, subject to any limitations listed on
Schedule I hereto, as of the date hereof, solely in his capacity as an
officer and not in his individual capacity, as follows:
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------







|1. A review of the Servicer's
activities during the calendar year 2013 (the "Reporting Period") and
of its performance under the Agreement has been made under the
undersigned officer's supervision; and
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. To the best of the
undersigned officer's knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has
fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material
respects throughout the Reporting Period.
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Dated: March 1, 2014
|--------------------



|PNC Bank, National Association
d/b/a Midland Loan Services
|----------------------------------------------------------





| | /s/ Steven W. Smith Steven W. Smith
Executive Vice President
| | ------------------------------------------------------------







|Member of The PNC Financial Services Group 10851 Mastin Boulevard Overland Park, Kansas 66210 800-327-8083www.pnc.com/midland
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------















|Schedule I
|----------



|Barclays Commercial Mortgage Securities LLC
|-------------------------------------------
|Direct Email: Daniel.vinson@barcap.com     









|Recipient Role | Deal Name Series Number                                                             | Midland Role   
|-------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------
|Depositor      | UBS-Barclays Commercial Mortgage Trust   Series 2013-C6 Master Servicer             | Master Servicer
|               | Master and Special Servicer of the Santa Anita Mall loan under the UBSB 2013-C5 PSA
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 899 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 899

 Congratulating Kentucky on being selected to host the 2010 Federation 
                  Equestre Internationale (FEI) Games.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 28, 2006

  Mr. Lewis of Kentucky submitted the following resolution; which was 
          referred to the Committee on International Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Congratulating Kentucky on being selected to host the 2010 Federation 
                  Equestre Internationale (FEI) Games.

Whereas there are 320,000 horses and nearly 200,000 owners, employees, and 
        volunteers involved in the horse industry in Kentucky, providing nearly 
        52,000 jobs;
Whereas the horse industry is an approximately $3,500,000,000 industry in 
        Kentucky, making it the largest segment of the State's agricultural 
        sector;
Whereas the Federation Equestre Internationale (FEI) Games comprise the most 
        prestigious competition in the equestrian world;
Whereas the FEI Games feature show jumping, dressage, eventing, driving, 
        endurance, vaulting, reining, and para-equestrian events;
Whereas the FEI Games occur only once every 4 years, and 2010 will mark the 
        first time the FEI Games are held outside Europe;
Whereas as many as 800 competitors representing 50 countries will attend the 
        2010 FEI Games;
Whereas more than 1,000 national and international media outlets will televise 
        the FEI Games in 180 countries;
Whereas the Kentucky Horse Park is the only single venue in the world that can 
        accommodate the entire FEI Games; and
Whereas the FEI Games will provide significant economic benefit for Kentucky, 
        with an estimated $100,000,000 in revenue: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved,  That the House of Representatives congratulates Kentucky 
on being selected to host the 2010 Federation Equestre Internationale 
(FEI) Games.
                                 <all>
```
Editorial Note on Part 10
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear at 68 FR 24879, May 9, 2003, and at 88 FR 45064, July 14, 2023.

§ 10.31 Citizen petitions and petitions for stay of action related to abbreviated new drug applications, certain new drug applications, or certain biologics license applications. ( a ) *Applicability.* This section applies to a citizen petition or petition for stay of action that meets all of the following criteria: ( 1 ) The petition requests that the Commissioner take any form of action that could, if taken, delay approval of an abbreviated new drug application submitted under section 505(j) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, a new drug application submitted through the pathway described by section 505(b)(2) of the Federal, Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, or a biologics license application submitted under section 351(k) of the Public Health Service Act.
( 2 ) The petition is submitted on or after September 27, 2007.
( 3 ) The petition is submitted in writing and under § 10.30 (for citizen petitions) or § 10.35 (for petitions for stay of action).
( b ) *Date of submission.* A petition subject to this section and submitted in accordance with § 10.20, § 10.30, § 10.31, or § 10.35 is regarded as submitted on the date on which the petition is received by the Dockets Management Staff.
( c ) *Certification.* ( 1 ) FDA will not consider for review a petition that is subject to this section unless the petition is in writing and contains the following certification:
( 2 ) The certification in paragraph (c)(1) of this section must contain one or more specific dates (month, day, and year) in the first blank space provided. If different categories of information become known at different times, the certification must contain each estimated relevant date. The information associated with a particular date must be identified.
( d ) *Verification.* ( 1 ) FDA will not accept for review any supplemental information or comments on a petition that is subject to this section unless the supplemental information or comments are in writing and contain the following verification:
( 2 ) The verification in paragraph (d)(1) of this section must contain one or more specific dates (month, day, and year) in the first blank space provided. If different categories of information become known at different times, the verification must contain each estimated relevant date. The information associated with a particular date must be identified.
[81 FR 78506, Nov. 8, 2016]
#### § 3000.220 What contracts and subcontracts, in addition to those listed in 2 CFR 180.220, are covered transactions?

Department of Homeland Security extends coverage of nonprocurement suspension and debarment requirements beyond first-tier procurement contracts under a covered nonprocurement transaction.
A NNALEI A VANCE Ñ A

A DVISOR

– R EGULATORY A FFAIRS P HONE /F AX :

E- MAIL : (312) 997-8349

A NNALEI

. A VANCENA @ U NITED

. C OM

December 29, 2009

Linda Lundell U.S. Air Carrier Licensing Division U.S. Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. Washington, D.C. 20590

Re: United Airlines Application for Streamlined and Consolidated U.S.-Mexico Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity

, dated December 4, 2009, Docket DOT-OST-2005-22228-- CORRECTION

Dear Ms. Lundell:

Please note the following correction w ith respect to the listing of points beyond Mexico City on page 3 of the Appendix to United’s above-referenced application. The point named as Barranquilla, Brazil should be named as Barranquilla, Colombia. For

ease of reference, attached is a corrected copy of the Appendix with this change highlighted.

A copy of this letter and the corrected Appendix will be filed electronically at regulations.gov and served on all persons on the attached Service List

Respectfully submitted,

Annalei Avanceña Advisor—Regulatory Affairs

cc: Service ListCERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that I have this date served a copy of the foregoing document on

all persons named below by causing a copy to be sent via email:

byerlyjr@state.gov

carl.nelson@aa.com charters@evergreenaviation.com donna.kooperstein@usdoj.gov dvaughan@kelleydrye.com (UPS) dwight.moore@ustranscom.mil

hkamen@coair.com howard_kass@usairways.com jhill@dowlohnes.com (JetBlue) john.allen@faa.gov kevin.montgomery@polaraircargo.com nssparks@fedex.com

sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com

matwood@sherblackwell.com (Kalitta)

Annalei Avanceña Advisor—Regulatory Affairs

Dated: December 29, 2009

### Corrected Appendix



## United’s U.S.-Mexico Exemption/Certificate Authorities

(Direct Service beyond Mexico City)

Pursuant to its Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity for Route 566 last reissued by Order 2000-5-31 in Docket DOT -OST-1999-5856, United is authorized to serve certain points beyond Mexico City in conjunction with the company’s Los AngelesMexico City service. By the same Certificat e, United is authorized to combine its route segment for Washington, D.C.-Mexico City/T oluca with its Los A ngeles-Mexico City segment to serve these beyond points.

Los Angeles &/or Washington via Mexico City to/from:

Barranquilla, Colombia

Belem, Brazil

Brasilia, Brazil

Buenos Aires, Argentina

Caracas, Venezuela

Georgetown, Guyana

Guatemala City, Guatemala

Managua, Nicaragua

Maracaibo, Venezuela

Montevideo, Uruguay

Panama City, Panama

Paramaribo, Suriname

Port of Spain, Trinidad and Tobago

Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

San Jose, Costa Rica

San Salvador, El Salvador

Sao Paulo, Brazil

Tegucigalpa, Honduras
§ 1122.100 Purpose of this subpart. This subpart provides: ( a ) Direction to DoD Components on how to construct the four articles of national policy requirements for inclusion in the general terms and conditions of grants and cooperative agreements.
( b ) Standard wording for national policy requirements that are more commonly applicable to DoD Components' grants and cooperative agreements.