alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 776 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 776

Supporting the observance of a ``National Day of the American Cowboy''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 25, 2006

 Mr. Hefley submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                   the Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Supporting the observance of a ``National Day of the American Cowboy''.

Whereas pioneering men and women, recognized as cowboys, helped establish the 
        American West;
Whereas that cowboy spirit continues to infuse this country with its solid 
        character, sound family values, and good common sense;
Whereas the cowboy embodies honesty, integrity, courage, compassion, respect, a 
        strong work ethic, and patriotism;
Whereas the cowboy loves, lives off of, and depends on the land and its 
        creatures, and is an excellent steward, protecting and enhancing the 
        environment;
Whereas the cowboy continues to play a significant role in the culture and 
        economy of the United States;
Whereas approximately 800,000 ranchers are conducting business in all 50 States 
        and are contributing to the economic well being of nearly every county 
        in the Nation;
Whereas rodeo is the sixth most-watched sport in the United States;
Whereas membership in rodeo and other organizations encompassing the livelihood 
        of a cowboy transcends race and sex and spans every generation;
Whereas the cowboy is an American icon;
Whereas to recognize the American cowboy is to acknowledge the ongoing 
        commitment of the United States to an esteemed and enduring code of 
        conduct;
Whereas the ongoing contributions made by cowboys to their communities should be 
        recognized and encouraged; and
Whereas the fourth Saturday in July has been proposed as an annual celebration 
        of the American cowboy: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) supports the observance of a ``National Day of the 
        American Cowboy''; and
            (2) encourages the people of the United States to celebrate 
        the day with appropriate ceremonies and activities.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<CIK>                         0000812788                     
<NAME>                        Jeffrey S. Williams, CFO
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         1,216,910
<SECURITIES>                                   7,175,722
<RECEIVABLES>                                    718,651
<ALLOWANCES>                                      38,000
<INVENTORY>                                    7,487,706
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                              11,659,706
<PP&E>                                         5,189,478
<DEPRECIATION>                                 1,639,096
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                26,695,080
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2,659,044
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                      12,849,805
<OTHER-SE>                                             0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  26,695,080 
<SALES>                                       14,063,408
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              14,203,228
<CGS>                                          5,858,904
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  8,489,014
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               3,894,552
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1,819,662
<INCOME-TAX>                                     664,980
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            1,154,682
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1,154,682
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        .22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        .22
        




</TABLE>
2007-2060.

#### Ali v. Thomas.

In Habeas Corpus. On petition for writ of habeas corpus of George B. Ali. Sua sponte, cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.
§ 1130.125 Federal interest in property improved under awards. ( a ) *Requirement.* A DoD Component's general terms and conditions must address the Federal interest in improvements to real property or equipment that results if a recipient directly charges the costs of the improvements to an award.
( b ) *Award terms and conditions.* A DoD Component's general terms and conditions therefore must either: ( 1 ) Include the wording appendix A to this part provides for Section E of PROP Article I to specify the Federal interest in improved real property or equipment; or
( 2 ) Reserve Section E of PROP Article I if there will be no improvements to real property or equipment under awards using those general terms and conditions or subawards under those awards.
§ 95.9 Communications. Except where otherwise specified, all communications and reports concerning the regulations in this part should be submitted as follows: ( a ) By mail addressed to: ATTN: Document Control Desk, Director, Office of Nuclear Security and Incident Response, U.S Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001;
( b ) By hand delivery to the NRC's offices at 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland; or
( c ) Where practicable, by electronic submission, for example, Electronic Information Exchange, or CD-ROM. Electronic submissions must be made in a manner that enables the NRC to receive, read, authenticate, distribute, and archive the submission, and process and retrieve it a single page at a time. Detailed guidance on making electronic submissions can be obtained by visiting the NRC's Web site at *http://www.nrc.gov/site-help/e-submittals.html ;* by e-mail to *MSHD.Resource@nrc.gov ;* or by writing the Office of the Chief Information Officer, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001. The guidance discusses, among other topics, the formats the NRC can accept, the use of electronic signatures, and the treatment of nonpublic information.
( d ) Classified communications shall be transmitted in accordance with § 95.39 of this chapter to the NRC Headquarters' classified mailing address listed in appendix A to part 73 of this chapter or delivered by hand in accordance with § 95.39 of this chapter to the NRC Headquarters' street address listed in appendix A to part 73 of this chapter.
[68 FR 58823, Oct. 10, 2003, as amended at 74 FR 62685, Dec. 1, 2009; 83 FR 58723, Nov. 21, 2018]
225 So.2d 5

#### STATE of Louisiana in the interest of William Louis HARRELL.

No. 49982.

July 8, 1969.

In re William Louis Harrell applying for writ of habeas corpus.

The petition of the relator in the above entitled and numbered case having been duly considered,

It is ordered that a writ of certiorari issue herein, directing the Honorable James C. Gulotta, Leo B. Blessing and James P. O’Connor, Judges of the Juvenile Court for the Parish of Orleans, to transmit to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, on or before the 14th day of October, 1969, the record in duplicate, or a certified copy of the record in duplicate, of the proceedings complained of by the relator herein, to the end that the validity of said proceedings may be ascertained.

It is further ordered that the aforesaid Judge of said Court and the respondent shall show cause, in this court, on the date aforesaid, at 11 o’clock A.M., why the relief prayed for in the petition of the relator should not be granted.

It is further ordered that, in the meantime and until the further orders of this court all proceedings against the relator in said Juvenile Court shall be stayed and suspended.

Granted with stay order.
Editorial Note on Part 72
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 72 appear at 80 FR 74981, Dec. 1, 2015, and at 81 FR 86910, Dec. 2, 2016.

§ 72.42 Duration of license; renewal. ( a ) Each license issued under this part must be for a fixed period of time to be specified in the license. The license term for an ISFSI must not exceed 40 years from the date of issuance. The license term for an MRS must not exceed 40 years from the date of issuance. Licenses for either type of installation may be renewed by the Commission at the expiration of the license term upon application by the licensee for a period not to exceed 40 years and under the requirements of this rule. Application for ISFSI license renewals must include the following: ( 1 ) TLAAs that demonstrate that structures, systems, and components important to safety will continue to perform their intended function for the requested period of extended operation; and
( 2 ) A description of the AMP for management of issues associated with aging that could adversely affect structures, systems, and components important to safety.
( b ) Applications for renewal of a license should be filed in accordance with the applicable provisions of subpart B of this part at least 2 years before the expiration of the existing license. The application must also include design bases information as documented in the most recently updated FSAR as required by § 72.70. Information contained in previous applications, statements, or reports filed with the Commission under the license may be incorporated by reference provided that these references are clear and specific.
( c ) In any case in which a licensee, not less than two years prior to expiration of its existing license, has filed an application in proper form for renewal of a license, the existing license shall not expire until a final decision concerning the application for renewal has been made by the Commission.
[53 FR 31658, Aug. 19, 1988, as amended at 76 FR 8890, Feb. 16, 2011]
#### In re Ramon MONTES, Sheriff of El Paso County, Texas, Petitioner.

No. 82-2201.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

May 18, 1982.

*416Michael Patrick Davis, Asst. County Atty., El Paso, Tex., for petitioner.

William Bennett Turner, San Francisco, Cal., Rick Gray, Asst. Atty. Gen., Austin, Tex., Bruce Ponder, El Paso, Tex., Dennis J. Dempsey, Dept, of Justice, Washington, D. C., for respondent.

Before CLARK, Chief Judge, RUBIN and TATE, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

The Sheriff seeks relief under the All-Writs Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1651. That statute empowers courts of appeals to issue all writs necessary or appropriate in aid of their jurisdiction. The Sheriff, however, has not shown that our jurisdiction is involved in this matter at this time. No attempt has been made to secure relief either from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas or from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas. The motion presented to us is the very first pleading raising the issue whether the Texas Department of Corrections has refused to accept prisoners from the Sheriff or whether the number of prisoners in the county jail violates the order of the Western District of Texas or whether there is any conflict in the operation of the two district court orders.

In effect the relief sought is the suspension of an injunction. No application has been made to a district court, as required by Rule 8, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. The argument is made that it would be vain to do so because of the action taken by the District Court for the Southern District of Texas in another matter. That, however, is not an adequate reason for noncompliance with Rule 8.

As an appellate court, we cannot take evidence or hear matters initially. We are dependent entirely on the record made in a trial court. None has been made. *Miller v. Connally,*354 F.2d 206 (5th Cir. 1963). All parties agree that the Texas Department of Corrections made a change in its policy on May 17, 1982, after this emergency petition was filed. We lack evidence of the effect of that change.

Moreover, even if our jurisdiction were properly invoked, it is well settled that relief under the All-Writs Act is not available unless the applicant has shown that he has no other adequate remedy. *In re Chicago, R.I. & P. Ry.,*255 U.S. 273, 41 S.Ct. 288, 65 L.Ed. 631 (1921); *Noble v. Eicher,*143 F.2d 1001 (D.C.Cir.1944) (per curiam).

The Sheriff has made no effort to secure relief from either of the trial courts involved and it is, therefore, patent that there is at least a possibility that he might obtain an adequate remedy if appropriate application were made and if he is in fact entitled to such relief.

For these reasons the application for a writ of prohibition is dismissed.

DISMISSED.
`[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 640 Reported in House (RH)]







                                                 House Calendar No. 141
109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 640

                          [Report No. 109-363]

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
bill (S. 1932) to provide for reconciliation pursuant to section 201(a) 
    of the concurrent resolution on the budget for fiscal year 2006.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

            December 19 (legislative day, December 18), 2005

    Mr. Putnam, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION


 
Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
bill (S. 1932) to provide for reconciliation pursuant to section 201(a) 
    of the concurrent resolution on the budget for fiscal year 2006.

    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order to consider the conference report to accompany the bill (S. 1932) 
to provide for reconciliation pursuant to section 201(a) of the 
concurrent resolution on the budget for fiscal year 2006. All points of 
order against the conference report and against its consideration are 
waived. The conference report shall be considered as read.
    Sec. 2. Section 2 of House Resolution 619 is amended to read as 
follows: ``On any legislative day of the second session of the One 
Hundred Ninth Congress from January 3, 2006, through January 30, 2006, 
the Speaker may dispense with organizational and legislative 
business.''.
                                                 House Calendar No. 141

109th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                              H. RES. 640

                          [Report No. 109-363]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
bill (S. 1932) to provide for reconciliation pursuant to section 201(a) 
    of the concurrent resolution on the budget for fiscal year 2006.

_______________________________________________________________________

            December 19 (legislative day, December 18), 2005

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed`
# EUR-Lex - 31987D0415 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31987D0415

**87/415/EEC: Council Decision of 15 June 1987 concerning the conclusion of a Convention between the European Community, the Republic of Austria, the Republic of Finland, the Republic of Iceland, the Kingdom of Norway, the Kingdom of Sweden and the Swiss Confederation on a common transit procedure **

*
Official Journal L 226 , 13/08/1987 P. 0001 - 0001 *

COUNCIL DECISION

of 15 June 1987

concerning the conclusion of a Convention between the European Community, the Republic of Austria, the Republic of Finland, the Republic of Iceland, the Kingdom of Norway, the Kingdom of Sweden and the Swiss Confederation on a common transit procedure

(87/415/EEC)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community, and in particular Article 113 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the Commission,

Whereas the conclusion of a Convention with Austria, Finland, Iceland, Norway, Sweden and Switzerland with a view to introducing a common transit procedure in trade between the Community ans those countries, as well as between those countries themselves, must enable the carriage of goods in the context of such trade to be simplified; whereas it is therefore appropriate to approve such a Convention;

Whereas this Convention falls within the framework of follow-up action to the Joint Declaration made in Luxembourg on 9 April 1984 by the Ministers of the Member States of the Community, the European Free Trade Association (EFTA) and the Commission expressing their political will to extend cooperation between the Community and those countries 'with the aim of creating a dynamic European economic space of benefit to their countries',

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The Convention between the European Economic Community, the Republic of Austria, the Republic of

Finland, the Republic of Iceland, the Kingdom of Norway, the Kingdom of Sweden and the Swiss Confederation on a common transit procedure is hereby approved on behalf of the Community.

The text of the Convention is attached to this Decision.

Article 2

The Community shall be represented in the joint committee provided for in Article 14 of the Convention by the Commission, assisted by the representatives of the Member States.

Article 3

The President of the Council is hereby authorized to deposit the instrument of acceptance provided for in Article 22 of the Convention.

Done at Luxembourg, 15 June 1987.

For the Council

The President

P. DE KEERSMAEKER

EWG:L333UMBE00.96

FF: 3UEN; SETUP: 01; Hoehe: 395 mm; 54 Zeilen; 2252 Zeichen;

Bediener: MARL Pr.: A;

Kunde: ................................
#### § 706.14 DOE's role in proceedings.

If controversies within the scope of the Labor Management Relations Act arise which cannot be adjusted by mutual agreement, and contested proceedings before NLRB result, each party to such proceedings will present his own position and the evidence in support thereof with due regard for existing security rules. DOE will be continuously informed of the progress of such proceedings and will act as may appear desirable (a) to assure the protection of classified information; (b) to assure that material and relevant information is not withheld from the record on grounds of security if such information can be supplied in unclassified form; and (c) to assist in determining appropriate action where a decision may turn on data which can be expressed only in classified form.
**Exhibit 32.1**
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Calgon Carbon Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John S. Stanik, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company for the periods presented therein.

/s/ John S. Stanik

 

 

 

 

Chief   Executive Officer

 

 

August 9,   2006

 

 

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           3,500
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  103,200
<ALLOWANCES>                                     7,400
<INVENTORY>                                     84,800
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               204,700
<PP&E>                                       1,041,300
<DEPRECIATION>                                 435,600
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 902,600
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          134,900
<BONDS>                                        633,800
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       173,600
<OTHER-SE>                                    (68,600)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   902,600
<SALES>                                        195,600
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               195,600
<CGS>                                          174,200
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  194,700
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (800)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              19,400
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (17,700)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (8,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (9,700)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (9,700)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.18)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.18)
        

</TABLE>
#### § 1136.600 Purpose of OAR Article VI.

OAR Article VI addresses recipients' responsibilities for closeout of awards and subawards under them. The article thereby implements OMB guidance in 2 CFR 200.343.
§ 719.42 What categories of costs are unallowable? ( a ) Specific categories of unallowable costs are contained in the cost principles at 48 CFR (FAR) part 31 and 48 CFR (DEAR) part 931 and 48 CFR 970.31. See also 41 U.S.C. 4304.
( b ) Costs that are customarily or already included in billed hourly rates are not separately reimbursable.
( c ) Interest charges that a contractor incurs on any outstanding (unpaid) bills from retained legal counsel are not reimbursable.