alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.1

       Statement Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
             By The Principal Executive Officer Regarding Facts and
                 Circumstances Relating to Exchange Act Filings


I, Steven N. Bronson, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended
September 30, 2002;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
registrant and I have:

     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
     information relating to the registrant is made known to me by others,
     particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being
     prepared;

     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
     procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
     quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

     c) presented in this quarterly report my conclusions about the
     effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on my
     evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's
auditors and the registrant's board of directors:

     a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
     controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
     process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
     registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

     b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
     employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
     controls; and

6. I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were
significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could
significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of my most recent
evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses.


Date:  November 13, 2002.


                                              /s/ Steven N. Bronson
                                              ------------------------------
                                              Steven N. Bronson, President
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 246 (Thursday, December 23, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 80823]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-32277]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2010-N-0074]


Agency Information Collection Activities; Announcement of Office 
of Management and Budget Approval; Registration and Product Listing for 
Owners and Operators of Domestic Tobacco Product Establishments and 
Listing of Ingredients in Tobacco Products

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a 
collection of information entitled ``Registration and Product Listing 
for Owners and Operators of Domestic Tobacco Product Establishments and 
Listing of Ingredients in Tobacco Products'' has been approved by the 
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act 
of 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jonna Capezzuto, Office of Information 
Management, Food and Drug Administration, 1350 Piccard Dr., PI50-400B, 
Rockville, MD 20850, 301-796-3794, e-mail: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#df95b0b1b1beb3a6b1b1f19cbeafbaa5a5aaabb09fb9bbbef1b7b7acf1b8b0a9"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e4ae8b8a8a85889d8a8acaa78594819e9e91908ba4828085ca8c8c97ca838b92">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the Federal Register of May 7, 2010 (75 
FR 25267), the Agency announced that the proposed information 
collection had been submitted to OMB for review and clearance under 44 
U.S.C. 3507. An Agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not 
required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays 
a currently valid OMB control number. OMB has now approved the 
information collection and has assigned OMB control number 0910-0650. 
The approval expires on December 31, 2012. A copy of the supporting 
statement for this information collection is available on the Internet 
at http://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain.

    Dated: December 17, 2010.
Leslie Kux,
Acting Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2010-32277 Filed 12-22-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Editorial Note on Part 180
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 180 appear at 79 FR 75879, Dec. 19, 2014.

§ 180.350 What must I do if I learn of information required under § 180.335 after entering into a covered transaction with a Federal agency? At any time after you enter into a covered transaction, you must give immediate written notice to the Federal agency office with which you entered into the transaction if you learn either that— ( a ) You failed to disclose information earlier, as required by § 180.335; or
( b ) Due to changed circumstances, you or any of the principals for the transaction now meet any of the criteria in § 180.335.
§ 1402.315 What are the requirements for availability of data? ( a ) All data, methodology, factual inputs, models, analyses, technical information, reports, conclusions, valuation products or other scientific assessments in any medium or form, including textual, numerical, graphic, cartographic, narrative, or audiovisual, resulting from a financial assistance agreement is available for use by the Department of the Interior, including being available in a manner that is sufficient for independent verification.
( b ) The Federal Government has the right to: ( 1 ) Obtain, reproduce, publish, or otherwise use the data, methodology, factual inputs, models, analyses, technical information, reports, conclusions, or other scientific assessments, produced under a Federal award; and
( 2 ) Authorize others to receive, reproduce, publish, or otherwise use such data, methodology, factual inputs, models, analyses, technical information, reports, conclusions, or other scientific assessments, for Federal purposes, including to allow for meaningful third-party evaluation.
( c ) Bureaus and offices of the Department of the Interior must include the language in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section in full text in all NOFOs and financial assistance agreements.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 764 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 764

  Recognizing and honoring firefighters for their many contributions 
                 throughout the history of the Nation.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 5, 2006

 Mr. Weldon of Pennsylvania submitted the following resolution; which 
           was referred to the Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Recognizing and honoring firefighters for their many contributions 
                 throughout the history of the Nation.

Whereas in 1736 Benjamin Franklin founded the Union Fire Company, the first 
        volunteer fire company;
Whereas there are more than 1,100,000 firefighters in the United States;
Whereas approximately 75 percent of all firefighters are volunteers who receive 
        little or no compensation for their heroic work;
Whereas career and combination fire departments protect 3 out of 4 Americans;
Whereas there are more than 30,000 fire departments in the United States;
Whereas approximately 100 firefighters die in the line of duty each year;
Whereas Congress recognizes that Christopher Nicholas Kangas was a heroic 
        firefighter;
Whereas more than 340 firefighters died responding to the terrorist attacks on 
        September 11, 2001;
Whereas firefighters respond to more than 24,000,000 calls during an average 
        year;
Whereas firefighters also provide emergency medical services and life safety 
        education; and
Whereas it is estimated that on April 7, 2005, more than 2,000 firefighters will 
        attend the 17th Annual National Fire and Emergency Services Dinner and 
        Seminars: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives honors and recognizes 
the more than 1,100,000 firefighters in the United States for their 
contributions to and sacrifice for the Nation.
                                 <all>
```
226 So.2d 923

#### STATE of Louisiana v. Bobby J. STANLEY.

No. 50163.

Oct. 14, 1969.

In re: Bobby J. Stanley applying for writ of certiorari.

Writ refused. No error in the judgment complained of.
SEA4*PDRT 

rA I R L I N E S 

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: November 8. 2011 

Contact Information 

Claire James: Marketing Coordinator/SeaPortAirtlnes, Inc. 

971-340-1713, Claire@SeaPortAir.com 

Rob McKinney: President/SeaPort Airlines, Inc. 

971-340-1711, Rob(5)SeaPortAir.com 

SeaPort Airlines Statement on EAS Proposals to Serve 

Muscle Shoals, Greenville, Laurel-Hattiesburg, and Tupelo 

* " • • 

(Novembers, 2011)-SeaPort Airlines today released the following statement regarding their proposals to provide air service 

to four rural communities in the Southern region of the United States: 

"On October 12, 2011. SeaPort Airlines submitted proposals to provide scheduled air service under the Essential Air Service 

program to Muscle Shoals, Laurel-Hattiesburg, Tupelo, and Greenville. Following communication via telephone, in writing, 

and in person, it is evident that all communities intend to reject all proposals, the incumbent will be held in under their current 

contract, and new proposals will be requested. For this reason, SeaPort Airlines has canceled its planned visits to each of the 

communities that were scheduled for this week. 

SeaPort Airlines understands the communities' concern regarding a change from a large to a smaller aircraft, though we 

believe that such a change to smaller aircraft with greater frequency is the future of rural air sen/ice. Our success in 

rebuilding passenger traffic in Arkansas communities, as well as providing reliable air service in Salina, KS and Pendleton, 

validate this belief. In each of these communities, SeaPort has successfully replaced larger aircraft or reinstated service after 

suspension from another carrier 

While we have canceled our visits planned for this week, we intend to maintain a dialogue with each community to develop a 

proposal, and to be able to submit a proposal in the future that provides an enhanced level of connectivity." 

About SeaPort Airlines 

Portland, Oregon-based SeaPort Airlines, Inc. operates daily scheduled flights in Arkansas, Kansas, Tennessee, Missouri, 

Texas; Itlaho, Oregon, Washington, and Alaska. Reservations can be made by calling 888-573-2767, at 

vww.SeaPortAirlines.com. or through all major CDS systems. Follow SeaPort on Facebook, Twitter, and via their blog the 

SeaPort RePort. SeaPort Airlines prides itself on its outstanding air service. Customers can expect to encounter a unique 

and personalized travel experience from the moment they arrive for check-in at the terminal until they reach their 

destination. 

# # #
#### American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance Company et al., Respondents, v IDI Construction, Inc., Defendant, and James Stumpf et al., Appellants. (And a Third-Party Action.)

[813 NYS2d 902]

Appeal from judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Helen E. Freedman, J.), entered August 29, 2005 and order, same court and Justice, entered July 13, 2005, unanimously withdrawn in accordance with the terms of the stipulations of the parties hereto. No opinion. Order filed. Concur—Buckley, P.J., Friedman, Marlow, Nardelli and McGuire, JJ.
###### Editorial Note on Part 25

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 25 appear at 79 FR 75879, Dec. 19, 2014.

#### § 25.455 Subaward.

*Subaward* has the meaning given in 2 CFR 200.1.
Exhibit 34.2

 

**REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

To the Audit and Finance Committee of the Board of Directors

UnionBanCal Corporation

San Francisco, California

 

We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanyingManagement's Report on Assessment of Compliance with SEC Regulation AB Servicing Criteria, that Union Bank, N.A. (the “Bank”),a wholly-owned subsidiary of UnionBanCal Corporation, complied with the servicing criteriaset forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for the servicing of certain retail installmentcontracts for Honda Auto Receivables 2013-1 Owner Trust (the "Platform") as of March 31, 2013, and for the period fromJanuary 23, 2013 (inception) through March 31, 2013, excluding criteria 1122(d) 1(i), 1(ii), 1(iii),1(iv),2(i), 2(iii), 2(iv), 2(v), 2(vi), 2(vii), 3(i), (4)(i), 4(ii), 4(iii), 4(iv), 4(v), 4(vi), 4(vii), 4(viii), 4(ix),4(x), 4(xi),4(xii), 4(xiii), 4(xiv), and 4(xv), which management has determined are not applicable to the activities performed by theBank with respect to the Platform. Management is responsible for the Bank’s compliance with the servicing criteria. Our responsibilityis to express an opinion on management's assertion about the Bank’s compliance with the servicing criteria based on our examination.

 

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standardsestablished by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board(United States), and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Bank’s compliance with the applicableservicing criteria, including tests on a sample basis of the servicing activities related to the Platform, determining whetherthe Bank performed those selected activities in compliance with the servicing criteria during the specified period, and performingsuch other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our procedures were limited to selected servicing activitiesperformed by the Bank during the period covered by this report and, accordingly, such samples may not have included servicing activitiesrelated to each asset-backed transaction included in the Platform. Further, an examination is not designed to detect noncompliancearising from errors that may have occurred prior to the period specified above that may have affected the balances or amounts calculatedor reported by the Bank during the period covered by this report. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis forour opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Bank’s compliance with the servicing criteria.

 

In our opinion, management's assertion that the Bank complied withthe aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of March 31, 2013, and for the period from January 23, 2013 (inception) throughMarch 31, 2013 for the Platform is fairly stated, in all material respects.

 

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

 

May 24, 2013
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                              JUL-1-1997              JUL-1-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                SEP-1-1997             SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           7,225                  16,641
<SECURITIES>                                     4,527                   2,227
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,262                  16,480
<ALLOWANCES>                                       633                     864
<INVENTORY>                                     11,384                  19,437
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                38,169                  57,345
<PP&E>                                          14,180                  17,007
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,923                   6,573
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  50,478                  73,420
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           15,180                  31,444
<BONDS>                                          4,824                   4,371
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                   6,205
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                        32,602                  38,169
<OTHER-SE>                                     (2,359)                 (6,769)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    50,478                  73,420
<SALES>                                         19,672                  13,257
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                20,564                  14,323
<CGS>                                           14,743                   8,939
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   15,126                   9,508
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,876                   9,485
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 322                     470
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,378                     115
<INCOME-TAX>                                       178                      77
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,200                      38
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,200                      38
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.19                    0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.18                    0.01
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Wellman, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Keith R. Phillips, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.







|By:/s/Keith R. Phillips
Chief Financial Officer and
Vice President
|------------------------------------------------------------------
#### ANDREWS, Respondent, v. COHEN, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

November 20, 1914.)

Action by James E. Andrews against George Cohen.

No opinion. Motion for reargument (103 App. Div. 580, 148 N. Y. Supp. 1028) denied, with $10 costs. Motion to resettle order denied, without costs. See, also, 149 N. Y. Supp. 1069.
#### § 603.1200 Definitions.

The terms defined in 10 CFR 600.3 apply to all DOE financial assistance, including a TIA. In addition to those terms, the following terms are used in this part.
###### Prev Doc | Prev Page | Doc List | USGS Home | Contents | Next Page | Next Doc

METHODS FOR SAMPLING FISH COMMUNITIES                    AS A PART OF THE NATIONAL WATER-QUALITY                     ASSESSMENT PROGRAM

----

**U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY**

**Open-File Report 93-104**
#### § 1800.209 Certifications and representations.

###### Cross Reference

Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 75948, Sept. 17, 2024.

The certifications and representations for NASA may be found in Appendix C of the GCAM, at: *https://prod.nais.nasa.gov/pub/pub_library/srba/index.html.*

[85 FR 71817, Nov. 12, 2020]
#### § 1108.335 Research.

*Research* means basic, applied, and advanced research.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-24-00034-CV 

IN RE Anthony MOORE, Relator

Original Proceeding1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Irene Rios, Justice

Delivered and Filed: February 7, 2024

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

On January 17, 2024, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus that included a request 

for emergency relief. After considering the petition and the record, this court concludes relator is 

not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, relator’s request for emergency relief is DENIED

and relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is DISMISSED without prejudice to relator seeking 

relief by appeal, if necessary, after a divorce decree is finalized. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).

PER CURIAM

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 23-04-0279-CVA, styled In the Matter of the Marriage of Jo Ann Moore 

and Anthony Moore, pending in the County Court at Law, Atascosa County, Texas, the Honorable Bob Brendel 

Presiding.
222 So.2d 879

#### STATE of Louisiana v. Larry COOPER.

No. 49882.

May 22, 1969.

In re: Larry Cooper applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition, mandamus, habeas corpus and stay order.

Application denied. On the showing made relator is not entitled to the relief prayed for.
§ 1500.4 Exceptions. Consistent with 2 CFR 200.102(b): ( a ) In the EPA, the Director, Office of Grants and Debarment or designee, is authorized to grant exceptions on a case-by-case basis for non-Federal entities.
( b ) The EPA Director or designee is also authorized to approve exceptions, on a class or an individual case basis, to EPA program specific assistance regulations other than those which implement statutory and executive order requirements.
[79 FR 76050, Dec. 19, 2014. Redesignated at 85 FR 61573, Sept. 30, 2020]
Exhibit 10.14
 DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS
60 WALL STREET
NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10005
  
 Re: Wellman, Inc. Credit Agreement dated as of February 27, 2008
 Funds Administrator Administrative Agent Credit
Agreement




---



##### 



Very truly yours,DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY
AMERICAS,as Administrative AgentBy:
    /s/ David J. BellTitle: Managing DirectorBy:
    /s/ Dusan LazarovTitle: Vice President 
 WELLMAN, INC.
 By:
    /s/ Keith R. PhillipsTitle: Chief Financial Officer
##### 



Exhibit 10.2
 WELLMAN, INC.
Fourth Amended and Restated
Management Incentive Compensation Plan for the Executive Group
 ARTICLE I
    
    NAME
  ARTICLE II
    
    STATEMENT OF PURPOSE
  ARTICLE III
    
    DEFINITIONS
 Plan Year
 Effective Date
 Committee
 Cause




---



##### 



Change of Control




---



##### 



Company
 ARTICLE IV
    
    PLAN ADMINISTRATION




---



##### 



ARTICLE V
    
    PARTICIPATION
  ARTICLE VI
    
    DESCRIPTION OF PLAN OPERATION
    ARTICLE VII
    
    CHANGE IN STATUS DURING THE PLAN YEAR
 Disability




---



##### 



ARTICLE VIII
    
    GENERAL PROVISIONS