alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 850.25 Exposure reduction and minimization. ( a ) The responsible employer must ensure that no worker is exposed above the exposure limit prescribed in § 850.22.
( b ) The responsible employer must, in addition: ( 1 ) Where exposure levels are at or above the action level, establish a formal exposure reduction and minimization program to reduce exposure levels to below the action level, if practicable. This program must be described in the responsible employer's CBDPP and must include: ( i ) Annual goals for exposure reduction and minimization;
( ii ) A rationale for and a strategy for meeting the goals;
( iii ) Actions that will be taken to achieve the goals; and
( iv ) A means of tracking progress towards meeting the goals or demonstrating that the goals have been met.
( 2 ) Where exposure levels are below the action level, implement actions for reducing and minimizing exposures, if practicable. The responsible employer must include in the CBDPP a description of the steps to be taken for exposure reduction and minimization and a rationale for those steps.
( c ) The responsible employer must implement exposure reduction and minimization actions using the conventional hierarchy of industrial hygiene controls (*i.e.,* engineering controls, administrative controls, and personal protective equipment in that order).
226 So.2d 526

#### Margaret DAVIS and Marlene Smith v. Orest PENA.

No. 49977.

Oct. 1, 1969.

In re: Margaret Davis and Marlene Smith applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court óf Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans. 222 So.2d 595.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal, there is no error of law in its judgment.
National Fire

Department Census
Why a National Fire Department Census?

In the spring of 1998, the Director of the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) convened a Blue 

Ribbon Panel of prominent members of the U.S. fire 

service to review the structure, mission, and purpose of 

the United States Fire Administration (USFA) and to make 

recommendations for the future of the Federal fire focus. 

The Blue Ribbon Panel noted the lack of a comprehensive 

list of fire departments and baseline data for the definition of the composition, capabilities, and activities of the 

Nation’s fire service. Their recommendation was for the 

USFA to develop a fire department census.

In the fall of 2001, the USFA launched a nationwide 

campaign for voluntary registration of fire departments 

by means of direct mailing, coordination with fire service 

organizations and State offices, referencing existing data 

sources, and conference promotions. By March 2004, 

close to 22,000 fire departments had registered with the 

National Fire Department Census.

The purpose of the census is to create a national database 

for use by the fire protection and prevention communities, allied professions, the general public, and the USFA. 

USFA will use the database to conduct special studies, 

guide program decisionmaking, and to improve direct 

communication with individual fire departments.

The census database provides a current directory of registered fire departments and includes basic information including address, department type, Web site, and number 
of stations. The survey also collects information that will 

be released in summary format only: population and area 

protected, number of personnel, and specialized services.

Visit the National Fire Department Census on the USFA

Web site at www.usfa.fema.gov/applications/fdonline/ to:

• view or download the current online directory;

• register your department in the fire department

 census; and

• update your department’s information in the fire 

 department census.

City of ABC Fire Department

Address: ABC Street

ABC, Maryland 21727

County: WASHINGTON

Dept Type: Mostly Career

Org Type: Local

Website: www.abcfiredepartment.com

Stations: 6 view additional addresses

Search results from the National Fire Department Census as displayed on the USFA Web site.
For more information about the National Fire Department 

Census or to obtain a copy of the census form, contact:

National Fire Department Census

United States Fire Administration

16825 South Seton Avenue

Emmitsburg, Maryland 21727

(800) 238-3358

www.usfa.fema.gov

FA-278/March 2004
ANNUAL RECLAIM AUDIT

PAGE 3 - 3 MARCH 2011

energy crisis. Even though there was a programmatic reduction to Compliance 

Year 2009 NOx holdings as part of the January 2005 rule amendments, 

Compliance Year 2009 NOx emissions still achieved aggregate RECLAIM 

emission reduction goals and were below the total allocations by 29%. Given the 

fact that there were programmatic reductions in NOx allocations starting with 

Compliance Year 2007 yet the percentage of leftover NOx RTCs in the program 

remains at 20% or higher for the last five compliance years, including 

Compliance Year 2009. There may be other forces at play to cause such results 

in addition to actual emission reductions implemented through the application of 

air pollution control systems by RECLAIM facilities. Potentially, the effects of the 

nation’s economic downturn and slow recovery over the last couple of years may 

also be a contributor to lower aggregate NOx and SOx emissions in the 

RECLAIM universe. Whether this development has short term or long lasting 

impacts is yet to be seen.

Table 3-1

Annual NOx Emissions for Compliance Years 1994 through 2009

Compliance

Year

Audited 

Annual 

NOx 

Emissions1

(tons)

Audited 

Annual 

NOx 

Emissions 

Change

from 1994

(%)

Total

NOx 

RTCs2

(tons)

NOx 

RTCs

Left Over

(tons)

NOx 

RTCs

Left Over

(%)

1994 25,420 0% 40,534 15,114 37%

1995 26,632 4.8% 36,484 9,852 27%

1996 24,414 -4.0% 32,742 8,328 25%

1997 21,258 -16% 28,657 7,399 26%

1998 21,158 -17% 24,651 3,493 14%

1999 20,889 -18% 20,968 79 0.38%

2000 19,148 -25% 17,208 -1,940 -11%

2001 14,779 -42% 15,617 838 5.4%

2002 11,201 -56% 14,111 2,910 21%

2003 10,342 -59% 12,485 2,143 17%

2004 10,134 -60% 12,477 2,343 19%

2005 9,642 -62% 12,484 2,842 23%

2006 9,152 -64% 12,486 3,334 27%

2007 8,794 -65% 11,046 2,252 20%

2008 8,346 -67% 10,705 2,359 22%

2009 7,317 -71% 10,377 3,060 29%

1

The RECLAIM universe is divided into two cycles with compliance schedules staggered by six 

months. Compliance years for Cycle 1 facilities run from January 1 through December 31 and 

Cycle 2 compliance years are from July 1 through June 30.

2

Total RTCs = Allocations + Converted ERCs.
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d)Certifications.

 

 

I, Leland F. Bunch, III, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this report on Form10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the periodcovered by this report on Form 10-K of the Morgan Stanley Bank of AmericaMerrill Lynch Trust 2013-C8 (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

 

2. Based on my knowledge, the ExchangeAct periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, all of thedistribution, servicing and other information required to be provided underForm 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Actperiodic reports;

 

4. Based on my knowledge and theservicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 ofRegulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports,the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreementsin all material respects; and

 

5. All of the reports on assessment ofcompliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and theirrelated attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteriafor asset-backed securities required to be included in this report inaccordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwisedisclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described insuch reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving the certifications above, Ihave reasonably relied on information provided to me by the followingunaffiliated parties:

 

Wells Fargo Bank, NationalAssociation, as Master Servicer, NS Servicing II, LLC, as Special Servicer,Colony NorthStar AMC OPCO, LLC, as Special Servicer, U.S. Bank NationalAssociation, as Trustee, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as CertificateAdministrator, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Custodian, SitusHoldings, LLC, as Trust Advisor, CoreLogic Commercial Real Estate Services,Inc., as Servicing Function Participant, National Tax Search, LLC, as ServicingFunction Participant, Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, NationalAssociation, as Primary Servicer for the Chrysler East Building Mortgage Loan,Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, as SpecialServicer for the Chrysler East Building Mortgage Loan, U.S. Bank NationalAssociation, as Trustee and Certificate Administrator for the Chrysler East BuildingMortgage Loan, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Custodian for theChrysler East Building Mortgage Loan, and Situs Holdings, LLC, as Trust Advisorfor the Chrysler East Building Mortgage Loan.

 

 

 

Dated: March 25, 2019

 

 

/s/ Leland F. Bunch, III

 

 

President and Chief Executive Officer

(senior officer in charge ofsecuritization of the depositor)
| 1.   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| May 13, 2011 |   | /s/ Christopher J. Schaber            |
|--------------|--------|---------------------------------------|
|         |   | Christopher J. Schaber, Ph.D.         |
|         |   | President and Chief Executive Officer |
|         |   | (Principal Executive Officer)         |
|         |   |                                  |
#### Ethel L. JONES, petitioner, v. Togo WEST, Secretary of Veterans Affairs.

No. 97-9025.

Supreme Court of the United States.

Oct. 5, 1998.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### General Services Administration

          - 41 CFR Parts 300-3, 301-10, 301-12, 301-30, 301-70, Chapter 301, Parts 302-1, 302-2, 302-3, 302-7, 302-11, and 303-70
          - [FTR Amendment 2010-07; FTR Case 2010-307; Docket 2010-0020, Sequence 1]
          - RIN 3090-AJ09

# AGENCY:

Office of Governmentwide Policy, General Services Administration (GSA).

# ACTION:

Final rule; correction.

# SUMMARY:

                        GSA is correcting a final rule that appeared in the                         **Federal Register**                         on November 29, 2010. The applicability date for the final rule was incorrectly designated December 29, 2010. This final rule correction document corrects the applicability date to January 1, 2011.                    

# DATES:

                        The effective date for the final rule published on November 29, 2010 at 75 FR 72965 remains November 29, 2010. The                         *applicability date*                         is corrected to January 1, 2011.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        The Regulatory Secretariat (MVCB), 1275 First Street, NE., Washington, DC, 20417, (202) 501-4755, for information pertaining to status or publication schedules. For clarification of content,                               ( print page 80351)                            contact Mr. Cy Greenidge, Program Analyst, Office of Governmentwide Policy, at (202) 219-2349. Please cite FTR Amendment 2010-07; FTR case 2010-307.                    

Dated: December 16, 2010.

James Vogelsinger,

Acting Deputy Associate Administrator, Office of Governmentwide Policy.

[FR Doc. 2010-32128 Filed 12-21-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6820-14-P
IV 

House Calendar No. 129 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 595 

[Report No. 109–343] 

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 

bill (H.R. 3199) to extend and modify authorities needed to combat 

terrorism, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 13, 2005 

Mr. GINGREY, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; 

which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

RESOLUTION 

Waiving points of order against the conference report to 

accompany the bill (H.R. 3199) to extend and modify 

authorities needed to combat terrorism, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it 

2 shall be in order to consider the conference report to ac3 company the bill (H.R. 3199) to extend and modify au4 thorities needed to combat terrorism, and for other pur5 poses. All points of order against the conference report 

6 and against its consideration are waived. 
House Calendar No. 129 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 595 

[Report No. 109–343] 

RESOLUTION 

Waiving points of order against the conference rerorism, and for other purposes. and modify authorities needed to combat ter- port to accompany the bill (H.R. 3199) to extend 

DECEMBER 13, 2005 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed
§ 1122.1 Purpose of this part. ( a ) This part specifies a standard format and standard wording of general terms and conditions for Subdivision B of the general terms and conditions of DoD grants and cooperative agreements, which concerns national policy requirements.
( b ) It thereby implements: ( 1 ) Office of Management and Budget (OMB) guidance in 2 CFR 200.210(b)(ii) and 200.300, as those paragraphs of 2 CFR part 200 relate to national policy requirements for general terms and conditions of DoD grants and cooperative agreements to institutions of higher education and other nonprofit organizations, States, local governments, and Indian tribes.
( 2 ) National policy requirements, to the extent they apply, for general terms and conditions of DoD awards to for-profit firms, foreign organizations, and foreign public entities.
§ 73.59 Relief from fingerprinting, identification and criminal history records checks and other elements of background checks for designated categories of individuals. Fingerprinting, and the identification and criminal history records checks required by section 149 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, and other elements of background checks are not required for the following individuals prior to granting access to Safeguards Information, including Safeguards Information designated as Safeguards Information-Modified Handling as defined in 10 CFR 73.2: ( a ) An employee of the Commission or the Executive Branch of the United States government who has undergone fingerprinting for a prior U.S. government criminal history records check;
( b ) A member of Congress;
( c ) An employee of a member of Congress or Congressional committee who has undergone fingerprinting for a prior U.S. government criminal history records check;
( d ) The Comptroller General or an employee of the Government Accountability Office who has undergone fingerprinting for a prior U.S. Government criminal history records check;
( e ) The Governor of a State or his or her designated State employee representative;
( f ) A representative of a foreign government organization that is involved in planning for, or responding to, nuclear or radiological emergencies or security incidents who the Commission approves for access to Safeguards Information, including Safeguards Information designated as Safeguards Information—Modified Handling;
( g ) Federal, State, or local law enforcement personnel;
( h ) State Radiation Control Program Directors and State Homeland Security Advisors or their designated State employee representatives;
( i ) Agreement State employees conducting security inspections on behalf of the NRC pursuant to an agreement executed under section 274.i. of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended;
( j ) Representatives of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) engaged in activities associated with the U.S./IAEA Safeguards Agreement who have been certified by the NRC;
( k ) Any agent, contractor, or consultant of the aforementioned persons who has undergone equivalent criminal history records and background checks to those required by 10 CFR 73.22(b) or 73.23(b).
( l ) Tribal official or the Tribal official's designated representative, and Tribal law enforcement personnel.
[73 FR 63580, Oct. 24, 2008, as amended at 77 FR 34206, June 11, 2012]
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM SPECTRUM
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES (DEBTORS IN POSSESSION)
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                           3,550
<SECURITIES>                                       905
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,870
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                         59
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                16,762
<PP&E>                                           1,345
<DEPRECIATION>                                     940
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  12,702
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,197
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            77
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                         283
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    12,702
<SALES>                                            320
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,699
<CGS>                                              191
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,738
<NET-OTHER-INCOME>                               1,722
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,160
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,095)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   3,255
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,160
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .02
        

</TABLE>
United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 9, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

In the

United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit

_______________

m 03-60191

_______________

LEROY MITCHELL, JR.,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

VERSUS

CITY OF GULFPORT, MISSISSIPPI, ET AL.,

Defendants,

CITY OF GULFPORT, MISSISSIPPI; MARK PEDUZZI; TODD WALLIS,

Defendants-Appellants.

_________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Mississippi

m 1:01-CV-449-GR

_________________________
2

Before GARWOOD, HIGGINBOTHAM, and

SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

*

The district court did not abuse its

discretion in considering the transcript of the

criminal proceeding, which transcript bears

sufficient indicia of reliability. In light of that

transcript, the district court determined that

there are genuine issues of disputed material

fact. Accordingly, we have no jurisdiction to

review the claim of excessive force. Johnson

v. Jones, 515 U.S. 304, 317 (1995). 

The appeal is DISMISSED for want of jurisdiction. Appellants’ motion to supplement

the record is GRANTED. We express no

opinion on the merits of any claim.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has

determined that this opinion should not be published

and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
Amendment No. 2 to Employment Agreement between Comcast Corp & Brian L. Roberts



 Exhibit 10.23 
 AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 
 This AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT is entered into on the 31st day of December, 2009, is between COMCAST CORPORATION, a Pennsylvania corporation (together with its subsidiaries, the “Company”), and BRIAN L. ROBERTS (“Employee”). 
 BACKGROUND 
 WHEREAS, the parties entered into an Employment Agreement dated as of January 1, 2005, as amended by Amendment to Employee Agreement dated as of February 13, 2009 (together, the “Agreement”), that sets forth the terms
and conditions of Employee’s employment with the Company, and 
 WHEREAS, the parties desire to amend the Agreement on the
terms and conditions contained herein. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto, intending to be legally bound hereby, agree as
follows: 
 1. Subparagraph 5(b) of the Agreement is hereby amended to add the following year and amount thereto: “Year
– 2010; Amount – $3,000,000.” 2. Except as modified hereby, the Agreement shall continue unmodified and in full force and effect. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed and delivered this Second Amendment on the date first-above written. 
  

			
	COMCAST CORPORATION
		
	By:	 	/s/ Arthur R. Block
	
	EMPLOYEE:
	
	/s/ Brian L. Roberts
	Brian L. Roberts