alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
           PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Greyhound Lines, Inc. and
Subsidiaries (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2002 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned President and Chief Executive Officer and Senior Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company hereby certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 that to the best of their knowledge:

         1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.

 /s/ Craig R. Lentzsch
-------------------------------
Craig R.Lentzsch, President and Chief Executive Officer
August 14, 2002

/s/ Jeffrey W. Sanders
------------------------------
Jeffrey W. Sanders, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
August 14, 2002
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

                    The companies listed in this notice have given notice under section 4 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843) (BHC Act) and Regulation Y, (12 CFR part 225) to engage                     *de novo,*                     or to acquire or control voting securities or assets of a company, including the companies listed below, that engages either directly or through a subsidiary or other company, in a nonbanking activity that is listed in § 225.28 of Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.28) or that the Board has determined by Order to be closely related to banking and permissible for bank holding companies. Unless otherwise noted, these activities will be conducted throughout the United States.                

Each notice is available for inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The notice also will be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing on the question whether the proposal complies with the standards of section 4 of the BHC Act.

Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding the applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors not later than January 11, 2011.

A. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas (E. Ann Worthy, Vice President) 2200 North Pearl Street, Dallas, Texas 75201-2272:

1. Grupo Financiero Banorte, S.A.B. de C.V., Mexico City, Mexico; to acquire 100 percent of the voting shares of Ixe Grupo Financiero, S.A.B. de C.V., Cuauhtemoc, Mexico, and indirectly acquire voting shares of Ixe Securities, LLC, New York, New York, and thereby engage in securities brokerage activities, pursuant to section 225.28(b)(7)(i) of Regulation Y.

      ( print page 82026)    

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, December 22, 2010.

Robert deV. Frierson,

Deputy Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2010-32652 Filed 12-28-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
#### In re COMMITTEE ON ADMISSION AND PRACTICE.

No. MISC. 6-98.

United States Court of Veterans Appeals.

July 29, 1998.

Before NEBEKER, Chief Judge, and KRAMER, FARLEY,HOLDAWAY, IVERS, STEINBERG, and GREENE, Judges.

*314ORDER

NEBEKER, Chief Judge.

It is ORDERED that Robert L. Gilliat, Esq., a member of the Committee on Admission and Practice, is designated to serve as Chair, only for the consideration of Case No. 97-8004.
#### PEOPLE v. LYNCH.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

December 11, 1914.)

Proceeding by the People of the State of New York against Daniel Lynch.

No opinion. granted. Order filed. See, also, 150 N. Y. Supp. 1102.
EX-35.9


(logo) WELLS FARGO

Corporate Trust Services

MAC R1204-010
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045

Tel: 410 884 2000
Fax: 410 715 2380


Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation
60 Wall Street
New York, New York 10005


RE: Annual Statement of Compliance for COMM 2013-LC6 Commercial Mortgage
    Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2013-LC6

Per the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of January 1, 2013 (the
"Agreement"), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank,
N.A., as Certificate Administrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows
as of and for the year ending December 31, 2013 (the "Reporting Period"):

(a) A review of Wells Fargo's activities during the Reporting Period and of its
performance under the Agreement has been made under such officer's supervision;
and

(b) To the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo
has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material
respects throughout the Reporting Period.


March 7, 2014


/s/ Brian Smith
BRIAN SMITH
Vice President


Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v James White, Appellant.

Judgment Supreme Court, Bronx County, rendered on December 13, 1978, unanimously affirmed. Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted. (See *Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Saunders,*52 AD2d 833.) We have reviewed this record and agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious points which could be raised on this appeal. Concur—Ross, J. P., Markewich, Silverman, Bloom and Yesawich, JJ.
# Materials Not Included in **Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket**

Docket Number: F AA - 2014 - 0485 Directorate Identifier: 2014NM093AD

777 - 27 - 0062, R 1 --- 1 0 / 1 / 09

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket 

### MA **Y BE VIEWED AT:** Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate Rules Docket 1601 Lind Ave. SW., Renton, WA 98057 425.227.1221 **DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Form Date: 0 3/05/2008
Exhibit 10.12
 DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS
60 WALL STREET
NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10005
  
 Re: Wellman, Inc. Credit Agreement dated as of February 27, 2008
 Funds Administrator Administrative Agent Credit
Agreement




---



##### 



Very truly yours,DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY
AMERICAS,as Administrative AgentBy:
    /s/ David J. BellTitle:  Managing DirectorBy:
    /s/ Dusan LazarovTitle: Vice President 
 WELLMAN, INC.
 By:
    /s/ Keith R. PhillipsTitle: Chief Financial Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### International Trade Commission

          - [Investigation No. 731-TA-1058 (Review)]

## Determination

                    On the basis of the record [1]                                          developed in the subject five-year review, the United States International Trade Commission (Commission) determines, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)), that revocation of the antidumping duty order on wooden bedroom furniture from China would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time.                

## Background

                    The Commission instituted this review on December 1, 2009 (74 FR 62817) and determined on March 8, 2010 that it would conduct a full review (75 FR 14469, March 25, 2010). Notice of the scheduling of the Commission's review and of a public hearing to be held in connection therewith was given by posting copies of the notice in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, Washington, DC, and by publishing the notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     on April 26, 2010 (75 FR 21657). The hearing was held in Washington, DC, on October 5, 2010, and all persons who requested the opportunity were permitted to appear in person or by counsel.                

                    The Commission transmitted its determination in this review to the Secretary of Commerce on December 14, 2010. The views of the Commission are                           ( print page 80529)                        contained in USITC Publication 4203 (December 2010), entitled                     *Wooden Bedroom Furniture from China: Investigation No. 731-TA-1058 (Review).*

By order of the Commission.

Issued: December 15, 2010.

Marilyn R. Abbott,

Secretary to the Commission.

# Footnotes

1.                             The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)).                    
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. 2010-32029 Filed 12-21-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
#### § 782.2 Objectives.

Whenever a claim of infringement of privately owned rights in patented inventions or copyrighted works is asserted against the Department of Energy, all necessary steps shall be taken to investigate and to settle administratively, to deny, or otherwise to dispose of such claim prior to suit against the United States.
#### JOSEPH, Appellant, v. GUERNSEY, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

January 6, 1915.)

Action by Isadore S. Joseph against Aai Guernsey.

No-opinion. Interlocutory judgment reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, upon the authority of Stroock Plush Co. v. Talcott, 129 App. Div. 14, 113 N. Y. Supp. 214, and demurrer sustained, without costs.
§ 905.35 New customer eligibility. ( a ) Allocations to new customers from the project-specific resource pools established under § 905.32 shall be determined through separate public processes in each project's marketing area. New customers receiving an allocation must execute a long-term firm power contract to receive the allocated power and are required to comply with the IRP requirements in this part. Contracts with new customers shall expire on the same date as firm power contracts with all other customers of a project.
( b ) To be eligible for an allocation, a potential new customer must be a preference entity, as defined in Reclamation law, within the currently established marketing area for a project.
( c ) Entities that desire to purchase power from Western for resale to consumers, including municipalities, cooperatives, public utility districts and public power districts, must have utility status. Native American tribes are not subject to this requirement. Utility status means that the entity has responsibility to meet load growth, has a distribution system, and is ready, willing, and able to purchase power from Western on a wholesale basis for resale to retail consumers. To be eligible to apply for power available from a project's initial resource pool, those entities that desire to purchase Western power for resale to consumers must have attained utility status by December 31, 1996, for the Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program—Eastern Division, and by September 30, 2000, for the Loveland Area Projects. To be eligible to apply for power from subsequent resource pool increments, these entities must have attained utility status no later than 3 years prior to availability of the incremental addition to the resource pool. Deadlines for attaining utility status for other projects will be established at a later date.
§ 200.300 Statutory and national policy requirements. ( a ) The Federal awarding agency must manage and administer the Federal award in a manner so as to ensure that Federal funding is expended and associated programs are implemented in full accordance with the U.S. Constitution, Federal Law, and public policy requirements: Including, but not limited to, those protecting free speech, religious liberty, public welfare, the environment, and prohibiting discrimination. The Federal awarding agency must communicate to the non-Federal entity all relevant public policy requirements, including those in general appropriations provisions, and incorporate them either directly or by reference in the terms and conditions of the Federal award.
( b ) The non-Federal entity is responsible for complying with all requirements of the Federal award. For all Federal awards, this includes the provisions of FFATA, which includes requirements on executive compensation, and also requirements implementing the Act for the non-Federal entity at 2 CFR parts 25 and 170. See also statutory requirements for whistleblower protections at 10 U.S.C. 2409, 41 U.S.C. 4712, and 10 U.S.C. 2324, 41 U.S.C. 4304 and 4310.
### Page 1 of 3 **Disposition Comments Docket No:**  

### FAA - 201 4 - 0009 These comments are in **Directorate ID:** 

### 201 3 -NM - 1 23 - AD response to an SNPRM Originating Office Tracking No.: 

### 13 - AD - 34 **Next Step:** F RAN SNPRM 

### N o C omments/Only

Supportive Comments Received

– If this box is checked, no signatures are required. No 

### Has the reference d service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? I f ye s, list latest revision and attach a cop y. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance. Instructions: Summarize all comments **by issue** (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue. **All comments relating to the sam e issue should be discussed together.**  Do not list all of the issues from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comm ents received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA - IR- M - 8040.1C Chapter 9. **ISSUE 1:** Select one o

f the following : If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because **ISSUE 2**  **:** Select one of the following :

If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree w ith because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD:

### Page 2 of 3

If **NO** , we don’t agree because **For additional issues, do uble**  **- click**  **here**

### Page 3 of 3 **S ignature Section**  Signature indicates concurrence with this action. Originating Office Tracking No.: **ASE** Printed Name **: Date** 

**Branch Man ager**  **Date**
Exhibit 35.1



|     |  |  |  |                                                                                                                        
|---- |  |  |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|LOGO |  |  |  | Corporate Trust Services 
MAC R1204-010 9062 Old
Annapolis Road Columbia, MD 21045 
Tel: 410 884 2000 Fax: 410 715 2380

Citibank, National Association

388 Greenwich Street

14th Floor

New York, New York 10013



|Re: | Annual Statement of Compliance for Sequoia Mortgage Trust 2013-4 Mortgage Pass- Through Certificates, Series 2013-4
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Per the Amended and Restated Pooling and Servicing dated as of January 1, 2014 (the Agreement), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Master Servicer (Wells Fargo), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2016 (the Reporting Period):

(a) A review of Wells Fargos activities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under such
officers supervision; and

(b) To the best of such officers knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of
its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

March 1, 2017



|              
|--------------
|LOGO          
|              
|Kristen Cronin
|Vice President



|                       |  |     
|---------------------- |  | ----
|Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. |  | LOGO
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                           5,600
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  101,200
<ALLOWANCES>                                     6,000
<INVENTORY>                                     88,200
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               213,300
<PP&E>                                       1,080,500
<DEPRECIATION>                                 488,300
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 954,800
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          132,300
<BONDS>                                        780,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       175,800
<OTHER-SE>                                   (159,700)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   954,800
<SALES>                                        197,600
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               197,600
<CGS>                                          186,100
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  206,700
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   200
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              21,100
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (30,400)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (11,600)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (18,800)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (18,800)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.35)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.35)
        

</TABLE>
§ 820.6 Computation and extension of time. ( a ) *Computation.* In computing any period of time set forth in this part, except as otherwise provided, the day of the event from which the designated period begins to run shall not be included. Saturdays, Sundays, and Federal legal holidays shall be included. When a stated time expires on a Saturday, Sunday or Federal legal holiday, the stated time period shall be extended to include the next business day.
( b ) *Extensions of time.* A DOE Official may grant an extension of any time period set forth in this part.
( c ) *Service by mail.* Where a pleading or document is served by mail, five (5) days shall be added to the time allowed by these rules for the filing of a responsive pleading or document. Where a pleading or document is served by express mail, only two (2) days shall be added.
Amendment No. 1 to Intersearch Group, Inc. 2005 Equity Incentive Plan



 Exhibit 10.5 
 AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO INTERSEARCH GROUP, INC. 
 2005 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN 
 THIS AMENDMENT NO. 1 to the InterSearch Group, Inc. (the “Company”) 2005 Equity Incentive Plan (the
“Plan”) amends the Plan as set forth below effective as of July 27, 2006. All capitalized terms not specifically defined in this Amendment shall have the meanings provided to them in the Plan. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows: 
  

	1.	The second sentence of Section 3(a) of the Plan is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows: 

 “The maximum number of shares of Stock with respect to which Plan Awards may be granted under the Plan, subject to adjustment in
accordance with the provisions of Section 9, shall be 1,744,124 shares.” 
  

	2.	Section 3(c) of the Plan is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows: 

 “The shares of Stock involved in the unexercised or undistributed portion of any terminated, expired or forfeited Plan Award shall be
made available for further Plan Awards. After the effective date of the Plan, if any shares of Stock subject to awards granted under the Company’s 2004 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended, would again become available for new grants under the
terms of such plan as if that plan had remained in effect after its termination date, then those shares of Stock will be available for the purpose of granting Awards under this Plan, thereby increasing the number of shares of Stock available for
issuance under this Plan as determined under the second sentence of Section 3(a). Any such shares of Stock will not be available for future awards under the terms of the Company’s 2004 equity Incentive Plan, as amended.” 
  

	3.	Except to the extent amended hereby, the terms and provisions of the Plan shall remain in full force and effect.
1 In The


### Court of Appeals
Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

__________________
N O . 09

- 19

- 0037 1

- CV

__________________ CHRISTINA WINTERS , Appellant

V.

JACOBO ARREGUIN RIVERA , Appellee

__________________________________________________________________ On Appeal from the 284th District Court Montgomery County, Texas Trial Cause No. 18

- 07

- 09703

- CV

__________________________________________________________________ MEMORANDUM OPINION
On December 4, 2019, we notified the parties that this appeal would be
dismissed unless the appellant remitted the filing fee for the appeal. Appellant did
not respond.
Appellant did not file an affidavit of indigence on appeal and has not shown

th at she is entitle d to proceed without payment of costs. See Tex. R. App. P. 20.1.2 There being no satisfactory explanation for the failure to pay the filing fee for the
appeal, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3.

APPEA L DISMISSED.

PER CURIAM

Submitted on January 15, 20 20 Opinion Delivered January 16, 2020
Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Johnson, JJ.