alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO

18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
connection with this Annual Report of STL Marketing Group, Inc. (the “Company”), on Form 10-K /A for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2014, as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Jose P. Quiros,
Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | Such
                                         Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014, fully complies
                                         with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                                         and                               
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  
| | (2) | The
                                         information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December
                                         31, 2014, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
                                         of operations of the Company.



|Date:
    December 11 , 2015 | By: | /s/ Jose P. Quiros                                                                                            
|---------------------------- | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                             |     | Jose
    P. Quiros                                                                                            
|                             |     | Principal
                                         Executive Officer
        STL
        Marketing Group, Inc.
§ 1401.100 What does this part do? This part requires that the award and administration of the DOI grants and cooperative agreements comply with Office of Management and Budget (OMB) guidance implementing the portion of the Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1988, 41 U.S.C. 701-707, as amended (hereinafter, “the Act”) that applies to grants. It thereby— ( a ) Gives regulatory effect to the OMB guidance (Subparts A through F of 2 CFR Part 182) for DOI's grants and cooperative agreements; and
( b ) Establishes DOI policies and procedures for compliance with the Act that are the same as those of other Federal agencies, in conformance with the requirement in 41 U.S.C. 705 for government-wide implementing regulations.
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officers of Longs Drug Stores Corporation
(the Company) hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:



(i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended October 28, 2004 (the Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



|                       |  |                                                                              
|---------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: December 3, 2004 |  | /s/ WARREN F. BRYANT                                                         
|                       |  | Warren F. Bryant Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer             
|                       | 
|Date: December 3, 2004 |  | /s/ STEVEN F. MCCANN                                                         
|                       |  | Steven F. McCann Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer



A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Longs Drug Stores Corporation and will be retained by Longs Drug Stores Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### § 1401.120 Does this part affect the Federal contracts that I receive?

It will affect future contract awards indirectly if you are debarred or suspended for a violation of the requirements of this part, as described in § 1401.610(c). However, this part does not directly apply to procurement contracts. The portion of the Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1988 that applies to Federal procurement contracts is carried out through the Federal Acquisition Regulation in 48 CFR part 23, subpart 23.5.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS IN THE QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 
10-Q OF DIGITAL MICROWAVE CORPORATION FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 1998 AND 
IS  QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          14,764
<SECURITIES>                                     6,637
<RECEIVABLES>                                   65,936
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,633
<INVENTORY>                                     65,981
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               162,825
<PP&E>                                          75,537
<DEPRECIATION>                                  42,631
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 211,083
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           48,408
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           467
<OTHER-SE>                                     162,023
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   211,083
<SALES>                                         53,003
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                53,003
<CGS>                                           41,660
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   41,660
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                26,183
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,838
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  27
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (13,935)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        27
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (13,962)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (13,962)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.30)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.30)
        

</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 180
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 180 appear at 79 FR 75879, Dec. 19, 2014.

§ 180.1005 State. ( a ) *State* means— ( 1 ) Any of the states of the United States;
( 2 ) The District of Columbia;
( 3 ) The Commonwealth of Puerto Rico;
( 4 ) Any territory or possession of the United States; or
( 5 ) Any agency or instrumentality of a state.
( b ) For purposes of this part, *State* does not include institutions of higher education, hospitals, or units of local government.
§ 600.330 Purpose of procurement standards. Section 600.331 sets forth requirements necessary to ensure: ( a ) Recipients' procurements that use Federal funds comply with applicable Federal statutes, regulations, and executive orders.
( b ) Proper stewardship of Federal funds used in recipients' procurements.
###### Editorial Note on Part 1

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear at 78 FR 34247, June 7, 2013.

#### § 1.59 Report of violations.

In order to ensure adherence to the authorized uses of the NRC seal and flag as provided in this subpart, a report of each suspected violation of this subpart, or any questionable use of the NRC seal or flag, should be submitted to the Secretary of the Commission.
**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Simclar, Inc, (the “Company”) on Form
      10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Barry J. Pardon,
      President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/
                Barry J. PardonBarry
                J. Pardon, PresidentSimclar,
                Inc.November
                17, 2008
#### § 1401.500 What are my responsibilities as a DOI awarding official?

To obtain a recipient's agreement to comply with applicable requirements in the OMB guidance at 2 CFR part 182, you must include the following term or condition in the award:

*Drug-free workplace.* You, as the recipient, must comply with drug-free workplace requirements in subpart B (or subpart C, if the recipient is an individual) of part 1401, which adopts the government-wide implementation of 2 CFR part 182; sections 5152-5158 of the Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1988, Pub. L. 100-690, Title V, Subtitle D; 41 U.S.C. 701-707.
# STATE OF LOUISIANA



# COURTOFAPPEAL,FIRSTCIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA NO. 2021 KW 1540 VERSUS KEVIN MICHAEL QUATREVINGT 

### JANUARY 31, 2022 In Re: Kevin Michael Quatrevingt, applying for supervisory writs, 22nd Judicial District Court, Parish of St. 

## Tammany, No. 

### 603, 891. BEFORE: MCDONALD, LANIER, AND WOLFE, JJ.

WRIT DENIED. JMM WIL EW



### COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

DEPUWLERKF COURT



### FOR THE COURT
#### Harvey School, Plaintiff, v. Town of Bedford, Defendant.

Submission of a controversy on an agreed statement of facts (CPLR 3222) to determine whether plaintiff’s ice skating rink qualifies for an exemption from taxation pursuant to section 420 of the Real Property Tax Law. Judgment directed for plaintiff, with costs. It being agreed that plaintiff is a nonprofit educational corporation, the only issue presented is whether the property in question (an ice skating rink and related facilities) is “used exclusively” for educational purposes (Real Property Tax Law, § 420). In our opinion, the primary use of the property is clearly educational and it is therefore totally exempt from taxation (see *Greater N. Y. Corp. of Seventh-Day Adventists*v. *Town of Dover,*29 A D 2d 861, app. dsmd. 23 N Y 2d 682). The fact that plaintiff also permits certain individuals, such as parents of students, alumni, parents of alumni, and certain residents of the Bedford Area with *“*outstanding ” skating backgrounds, to use the rink during nonschool hours for a fee (to defray maintenance costs) does not destroy the exemption *(Temple Grove Seminary*v. *Cramer,*98 N. Y. 121). Even if such' use be nonedueational, it is clearly incidental to the primary use of providing for the physical education and welfare of plaintiff’s students (see *People ex rel. Watchtower Bible & Tract Soc.*v. *Haring,*8 N Y 2d 350; but see *Young Women’s Christian Assn.*v. *City of New York,*217 App. Div. 406, affd. 245 N. Y. 562; *People ex rel. Adelphi College*v. *Wells,*97 App. Div. 312, affd. 180 N. Y. 534). Christ, P. J., Munder, Martuscello, Latham and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.
**South Dakota**

**South Dakota 03 Clay**
SERVED:FEBRUARY

### 2,2017U.S.DEPARTMENTOFTRANSPORTATIONOFFICEOFHEARINGS

### WASHINGTON,DCINTHEMATTEROF

### CLASSICAIR

### AVIATION,LLCDOCKETNO.FAA-2015-2438

## (CivilPenalty

## Action)ORDEROFCHIEFADMINISTRATIVELAWJUDGEDISMISSINGPROCEEDINGWITHPREJUDICE

## ByNotice

## filed'and

## served2January4,2017,

## Respondentstates

### that,becausethe

## parties"have

## signedsettlement

## agreement,"itwithdrawsits

## "appealofthis

## matter."3Sinceno

## appealis

## pending,theNotice

### isdeemedto

### bewithdrawalof

## Respondent'srequestfor

# hearing.4Accordingly,pursuantto

### Rule

### 215,this

## proceedingis

### dismissedwith

# prejudice.5TheFAAshallsendthe

## JudgeandDocketcopyofany

### compromiseorderorfinalorder

### assessingcivil

## penalty.SOORDERED.

### AttachmentServiceList

### 'Doc.No.9,FDMSNo.FAA-2015-2438,Letterto

### HearingDocketClerkandChiefAdministrativeLaw

### Judge("AU")(Jan.4,

### 2017)

### (Marple,Opns.Dir),availableat

### https://www.regulations.gov/document?D=FAA-2015-2438-0009

### ("Notice").Id.

### ("Sentvia.Mail...

### [a]ndEmailto

### David.F.Shayne@faa.gov").Inresponsetostatus

### inquiry,Mr.

### Shayneadvisedthatheisnow

### Complainant'sCounsel.SeeNotice,supranote1.

### 4SeeRule215

### ("Atanytimebeforeor

### duringhearing,anagencyattorneymaywithdraw

### complaintorpartymaywithdrawrequestfor

### hearingwithouttheconsentoftheadministrativelaw

### judge."14C.F.R.13.215

### (2016),availableat

### https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkgICFR-2016-title14

### -voll/pdf'CFR-2016-title14-vol

### partl3

### .pdf.Id.

### ("Ifanagencyattorneywithdrawsthe

### complaintorpartywithdrawstherequestfor

### hearing.theadministrativelaw

### judgeshalldismissthe

### proceedingsunderthis

### subpartwith

### prejudice.).

## –2– Docket No. FAA-2015-2438

(Civil Penalty Action)

UPDATED SERVICE LIST

— BY U.S. MAIL

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY

Federal Aviation Administration

800 Independence Avenue, S.W.

Washington, DC 20591

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC -430

Wilbur Wright Building – Suite 2W1000 6



## ONE COPY

Jon Marple, Operations Directo r

Classic Air Aviation, LLC, Respondent

4805 E. Falcon Drive

Mesa, AZ 85215

TEL: 602-574-5376

David F. Shayne, Complainant’s Counsel

Federal Aviation Administration

Western Enforcement Team, Enforcement Division, AGC -300

1601 Lind Avenue Southwest

Renton, WA 98057

TEL: 425-227-2165

FAX: 425-227-1007

The Honorable Ronnie A. Yoder, Chief Administrative Law Judge

U.S. Department of Transportation

Office of Hearings, M -20

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310)

Washington, DC 20590

TEL: 202-366-2142

FAX: 202-366-7536

6 

### Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building

– Suite 2W1000, Washington,

DC 20591, Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC

- 430.
#### § 1402.5 Non-Federal entity.

*Non-Federal entity* means a State, local government, Indian tribe, institution of higher education (IHE), for-profit entity, or nonprofit organization that carries out a Federal award as a recipient or subrecipient.
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Commercial Mortgage  Servicing**D1050-084, 8th Floor  550 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|--------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

 

Reference is hereby made tothat certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of March 1, 2013, by andamong DEUTSCHE MORTGAGE & ASSET RECEIVING CORPORATION, as Depositor, WELLS FARGOBANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONALASSOCIATION, as Special Servicer, U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee,PARK BRIDGE LENDER SERVICES LLC, as Operating Advisor and DEUTSCHE BANK TRUSTCOMPANY AMERICAS, as Certificate Administrator, Paying Agent and Custodian withrespect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series COMM2013-CCRE6 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein nototherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 10.11 ofthis Agreement, I, Daniel Marthinsen, Managing Director of Special Servicing dohereby certify that:

 

1. A review of the activitiesof the Special Servicer during the period from January 1, 2016 through December31, 2016 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance per theAgreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and

 

2. To the best of myknowledge, based on such review, the Special Servicer has fulfilled all of itsobligations under this Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, theundersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of Febryary 2017.

 

/s/ Daniel Marthinsen

Daniel Marthinsen

Managing Director

Wells Fargo Bank

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll  go far |
|------------------------|-------------------------------------|
§ 830.203 Unreviewed safety question process. ( a ) The contractor responsible for a Hazard Category 1, 2, or 3 DOE nuclear facility must establish, implement, and take actions consistent with a DOE-approved USQ procedure that meets the requirements of this section.
( b ) The contractor responsible for a new Hazard Category 1, 2, or 3 DOE nuclear facility must submit for DOE approval a procedure for its USQ process on a schedule that allows DOE approval in a safety evaluation report issued pursuant to § 830. 207(a) of this part.
( c ) The contractor responsible for a Hazard Category 1, 2, or 3 DOE nuclear facility must implement the DOE-approved USQ procedure in situations where there is a: ( 1 ) Temporary or permanent change in the facility as described in the existing documented safety analysis;
( 2 ) Temporary or permanent change in the procedures as described in the existing documented safety analysis;
( 3 ) Test or experiment not described in the existing documented safety analysis; or
( 4 ) Potential inadequacy of the documented safety analysis because the analysis potentially may not be bounding or may be otherwise inadequate.
( d ) A contractor responsible for a Hazard Category 1, 2, or 3 DOE nuclear facility must obtain DOE approval prior to taking any action determined to involve a USQ.
( e ) The contractor responsible for a Hazard Category 1, 2, or 3 DOE nuclear facility must annually provide to DOE a summary of the USQ determinations performed since the prior submittal.
( f ) If a contractor responsible for a Hazard Category 1, 2, or 3 DOE nuclear facility discovers or is made aware of a potential inadequacy of the documented safety analysis, it must: ( 1 ) Take action, as appropriate, to place or maintain the facility in a safe condition until an evaluation of the safety of the situation is completed;
( 2 ) Notify DOE of the situation;
( 3 ) Perform a USQ determination and notify DOE promptly of the results; and
( 4 ) Submit the evaluation of the safety of the situation to DOE prior to removing any operational restrictions initiated to meet paragraph (f)(1) of this section.
#### PEOPLE v. GROUT.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

January 15, 1915.)

Appeal from Special Term, Kings County.

Edward M. Grout was indicted for perjury. From an order denying his motion to supersede and set aside an indictment, and dismiss it for lack of prosecution, he appeals.

Appeal dismissed.

Argued before BURR, THOMAS, RICH, and PUTNAM, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal dismissed, upon authority of People v. Grout, 151 N. Y. Supp. 322 (Appeal No. 1), decided herewith.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         243,530
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               243,530
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 243,530
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,550
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,439,559
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,203,579)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   243,530
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,200
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (1,574)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (626)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (626)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### § 1122.120 Other national policy requirements.

If a DoD Component determines that awards using its general terms and conditions, or subawards under them, are subject to a national policy requirement that is not addressed in the standard wording appendices A through D to this part provide for cross-cutting requirements, the DoD Component must include the requirement in its general terms and conditions. It should add the requirement in Section B of NP Article I, II, III, or IV, as most appropriate to the subject matter of the requirement.