alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
227 So.2d 374

#### In re Arthur W. JONES applying for Writ of Habeas Corpus.

No. 50188.

Nov. 6, 1969.

In re: Arthur W. Jones applying for writ of habeas corpus.

Writ refused. Considering the return of the district attorney the application is insufficient to warrant the exercise of our supervisory jurisdiction.
450044568410/07COMMONWEALTHOFPENNSYLVAMASTD—521REV.12-88 

# PUBLICATIONSAUTHORIZATION AND INVOICEINVORENO. 

# 1.52197

PUBLICATIONS AUTHORIZATION (To be completed by agency)HEREWITHISENCLOSEDCOPYFORPUBUCATIONOFADVERTISEMENTFORPROPOSALSTOEMPLOYPUBUSHADVERTISEMENT(NO.OFT1MES)



# IDATESOFINSERTION 

# December 10, 2009You,asvendor,areauthorizedtopublishthisadvertiserrentinyournewspaper,subjecttothetermsof,this9rder,asfollows:Advertiseesenttobepiblishedinregularadvortisngcolmnnopo&tidn%iedified;capticthof‘iwolinesand‘igrtaturetobeincapitalsandsubjectmatterandtitleofoffieer..tobesetsolidin 

# typeregularlyusedby_yournewspaperforpublic(legal)noceadvertising;chargetobemadeattheratechargedtoandpaidbycommercialadvertisersformattersimilarlysetandoccupyingsimilarspace;advertisementtoberunintheeditionsspecifiedabove.Vendoragreesthat,intheperformanceofanycontractawardedtoithereunder,saidvendorwillnotdiscriminateagainstanyemployeorotherpersonsonaccountofrace,color,sex,religiouscreed,ancestry,ageornationaloriginandthattheCommonwealth,uponreceiptofsatisfactoryevidenceofsuchdiscrimination,shallhavetherighttocancelsaidcontract.Returnthiscopyatonceifyouwillnotacceptthisadvertisementunderthetermssetforth.ProofofadvertisingintheformofatearsheetmustbeincludedonParts1,283 

# Returnoriginalandtwocopies(signedbytheeditororpublisher)toAgencylistedabove.Part1mustbenotarized.Part4isyours.Commonwealthtobebilledonlyforactualnumberofprintedlinespublished.LOG



# Sf#’ O7(74YOOI- 

# r’ 35trg-_____



# CC 35ti-2 731Cc’ od,

INVOICE (To be completed by publisher)DATEOFINSERt1ONACTUALNOOFPRINTEDUNESCOSTPERLINETOTALAMOUNT-.---.-.------ 

# -..1._--.--..-..--__.--2ndAd-...3rdAd——— 

# 4k””—---‘1-’--__—--—



# PASTE TEARSHEET HERECommon’eaLthofPennsyl)Lania 

# ICountyof 

# At’ 4 tiVcc I.Beforeme,thesubscriber,aNotaryPublicinandforsaidCouny,pernallyeme‘ 

# (Zwhoje’zlulyswornØothdeposndsaythatheis’.thU‘t-.L’ageneraln4wsaperpublishedat.-- 

# fthattheadvertisement,ofwhichtearsheetisattachedhereto,vfaspublishedintheregularadvertisingcolumnsofsaidnewspaper,intheeditionsofsaidnewspaper,inallrespectsasorderedandinvoicedabove;andthattheCommonwealthisnotchargedthereforataratehigherthanischargedanyordinarycommercialadvertiserforasimilaramountofmatteroccupyingsimilarspaceandSetinasimilarmanner,insaidnewspaper...... 

# /7111Sworjapdsubscribedbeforemethis‘ 

# /2..



# day of‘-‘L/i/I( 

# 20TO;SMEANRESSOFNEwspAa)



# Inc iimes eaaer

P.O Box 730 Wilkes—Barre, 1 PA 18711FED7IL1OFftAN%ODRNCY) 

# 495

Bureau of Air QualLty..--..---.-



# 12th Floor..



# Harrisburg, PA 17105TYPEOFADLEGALNOTiCEACCOUNTCODEFUNDDEPTAPPYEAR—-..—1.-—1StAdORGyOSTFUNCTIONON.)AMOUNT_.‘•T.*.,4



# j ‘7..... 

# 7: ‘/E.GRANDTOTAL--ISIGNATREOFAIANTNOTARYPUBLIC——i-i/i 

# /2)Mycommissionexpires/C.•_/



# /L/9ThisaffidavitmustbemadebytheOwner,Publisher,orthedesignatedagentoftheownerorpublisher.IrZMflriPflWflk’TAKIOr.Arr-rAI
MEMORANDUM 

DATE: 9/17/2014

TO: Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket Id: OAR–2013-0602

FROM: Michael Gordon, EPA Region 3

SUBJECT: 8/26/14 Meeting with Virginia Secretary of Natural Resources Regarding

Proposed Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants

SUMMARY

A meeting was held between the EPA Region 3 Regional Administrator and the Virginia 

Secretary of Natural Resources on August 26, 2014 to discuss the proposed Clean Power Plan for 

Existing Power Plants. The Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants was proposed on June 2, 

2014.

ATTENDEES

Shawn Garvin, Regional Administrator

Molly Ward, Virginia Secretary of Natural Resources
Editorial Note on Part 180
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 180 appear at 79 FR 75879, Dec. 19, 2014.

§ 180.845 What does the debarring official consider in deciding whether to debar me? ( a ) The debarring official may debar you for any of the causes in § 180.800. However, the official need not debar you even if a cause for debarment exists. The official may consider the seriousness of your acts or omissions and the mitigating or aggravating factors set forth at § 180.860.
( b ) The debarring official bases the decision on all information contained in the official record. The record includes— ( 1 ) All information in support of the debarring official's proposed debarment;
( 2 ) Any further information and argument presented in support of, or in opposition to, the proposed debarment; and
( 3 ) Any transcribed record of fact-finding proceedings.
( c ) The debarring official may refer disputed material facts to another official for findings of fact. The debarring official may reject any resultant findings, in whole or in part, only after specifically determining them to be arbitrary, capricious, or clearly erroneous.
§ 50.74 Notification of change in operator or senior operator status. Each licensee shall notify the appropriate NRC contact, as described in § 55.5 of this chapter, within 30 days of the following in regard to a licensed operator or senior operator: ( a ) Permanent reassignment from the position for which the licensee has certified the need for a licensed operator or senior operator under § 55.31(a)(3) of this chapter;
( b ) Termination of any operator or senior operator;
( c ) Permanent disability or illness as described in § 55.25 of this chapter.
[52 FR 9469, Mar. 25, 1987, as amended at 60 FR 13616, Mar. 14, 1995; 68 FR 58809, Oct. 10, 2003; 86 FR 67842, Nov. 30, 2021]
#### § 733.2 Scope.

This part applies to allegations of research misconduct with regard to scientific research conducted under a Department of Energy contract or an agreement.
§ 961.4 Deviations. Requests for authority to deviate from this part shall be submitted in writing to the Contracting Officer, who shall forward the request for approval to the Senior Procurement Official, Headquarters. Each request for deviation shall contain the following information: ( a ) A statement of the deviation desired, including identification of the specific paragraph number(s) of the contract;
( b ) A description of the intended effect of the deviation;
( c ) The reason why the deviation is considered necessary or would be in the best interests of the Government;
( d ) The name of the owner or generator seeking the deviation and nuclear power reactor(s) affected;
( e ) A statement as to whether the deviation has been requested previously and, if so, circumstances of the previous request;
( f ) A statement of the period of time for which the deviation is needed; and
( g ) Any pertinent background information will contribute to a full understanding of the desired deviation.
#### § 862.6 Voluntary minimum altitude.

In addition to complying with all applicable FAA prohibitions or restrictions, aircraft are requested to maintain a minimum altitude of 2,000 feet above the terrain of a designated site. Applicable FAA prohibitions or restrictions take precedence over this voluntary minimum altitude.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 21
- 0143 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. ROBERT MURRAY GIBBONS,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including January 14, 2022, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening b rief on appeal.

.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

December 9 2021

12/09/2021

Case Number: DA 21-0413
§ 1401.325 What actions must I take concerning employees who are convicted of drug violations in the workplace? There are two actions you must take if an employee is convicted of a drug violation in the workplace: ( a ) First, you must notify Federal agencies if an employee who is engaged in the performance of an award informs you about a conviction, as required by § 1401.305(c)(2), or you otherwise learn of the conviction. Your notification to the Federal agencies must— ( 1 ) Be in writing;
( 2 ) Include the employee's position title;
( 3 ) Include the identification number(s) of each affected award;
( 4 ) Be sent within ten calendar days after you learn of the conviction; and
( 5 ) Be sent to every Federal agency on whose award the convicted employee was working. It must be sent to every awarding official or his or her official designee, unless the Federal agency has specified a central point for the receipt of the notices.
( b ) Second, within 30 calendar days of learning about an employee's conviction, you must either— ( 1 ) Take appropriate personnel action against the employee, up to and including termination, consistent with the requirements of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. 794, as amended; or
( 2 ) Require the employee to participate satisfactorily in a drug abuse assistance or rehabilitation program approved for these purposes by a Federal, State or local health, law enforcement, or other appropriate agency.
#### § 1134.400 Purpose of REP Article IV.

REP Article IV of the general terms and conditions specifies requirements for recipients to report information about subawards and executive compensation.
EXHIBIT 31.1  CERTIFICATION  Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  I, Lawrence M. Powers, certify that:  1)

        I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of
 SITI-Sites.com, Inc. (the Registrant)
  2)Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does
not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;  3)Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,
and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;  4)The registrants other certifying officers and
I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:  a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to
the registrant is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;  b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a
date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the Evaluation Date); and  c)   presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;  5)The registrants other certifying officers and
I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the audit  committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):  a)   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified any material weaknesses in internal controls; and  b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrants internal controls; and  6)The registrants other certifying officers and
I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the
date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.  Date:    August 14, 2006By/s/   Lawrence M. PowersLawrence M. PowersChief Executive Officer andChairman of the Board of Directors
   11
IV 

House Calendar No. 27 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 229 

[Report No. 115–60] 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1430) to prohibit the Environmental Protection Agency from proposing, finalizing, or disseminating 

regulations or assessments based upon science that is not transparent 

or reproducible. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 27, 2017 

Mr. WOODALL, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1430) to prohibit the Environmental Protection Agency from proposing, finalizing, or disseminating regulations or assessments based upon science that is not transparent or 

reproducible. 

1 Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it 

2 shall be in order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 

3 1430) to prohibit the Environmental Protection Agency 

4 from proposing, finalizing, or disseminating regulations or 

5 assessments based upon science that is not transparent 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 229 RH 

1 or reproducible. All points of order against consideration 

2 of the bill are waived. The bill shall be considered as read. 

3 All points of order against provisions in the bill are 

4 waived. The previous question shall be considered as or5 dered on the bill and on any amendment thereto to final 

6 passage without intervening motion except: (1) one hour 

7 of debate equally divided and controlled by the chair and 

8 ranking minority member of the Committee on Science, 

9 Space, and Technology; and (2) one motion to recommit. 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS

asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
House Calendar No. 27 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 229 

[Report No. 115–60] 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1430) 

not transparent or reproducible. lations or assessments based upon science that is from proposing, finalizing, or disseminating reguto prohibit the Environmental Protection Agency 

MARCH 27, 2017 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### MARKEVICH, Appellant, v. ROYAL INS. CO., Limited, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

April 24, 1914.)

Action by Peter Markevich against the Royal Insurance Company, Limited.

No opinion. Motion granted, without costs. See, also, 147 N. Y. Supp. 1004; 148 N. Y. Supp. 1129.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Wellman, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Thomas M. Duff, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.







|By: /s/Thomas M. DuffChief Executive Officer
|--------------------------------------------
#### § 960.3-3 Consultation.

The DOE shall provide to designated officials of the affected States and to the governing bodies of any affected Indian tribe timely and complete information regarding determinations or plans made with respect to the siting, site characterization, design, development, construction, operation, closure, decommissioning, licensing, or regulation of a repository. Written responses to written requests for information from the designated officials of affected States or affected Indian tribes will be provided within 30 days after receipt of the written requests. In performing any study of an area for the purpose of determining the suitability of such area for the development of a repository, the DOE shall consult and cooperate with the Governor and the legislature of an affected State and the governing body of an affected Indian tribe in an effort to resolve concerns regarding public health and safety, environmental impacts, socioeconomic impacts, and technical aspects of the siting process. After notifying affected States and affected Indian tribes that potentially acceptable sites have been identified, or that a site has been approved for characterization, the DOE shall seek to enter into binding written agreements with such affected States or affected Indian tribes in accordance with the requirements of the Act. The DOE shall also consult, as appropriate, with other Federal agencies.
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,

J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk May 24, 2011

d0516 

# Order

May 24, 2011

141049-51(74)

ROBIN DECKER, as Next Friend of ERIC DECKER, a Minor, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 141049-51 COA: 284155; 285870; 290633 Montcalm CC: 06-007819-NH MICHAEL STOIKO, M.D., SPECTRUM HEALTH HOSPITALS, INC., d/b/a BUTTERWORTH HOSPITAL, and SPECTRUM HEALTH HOSPITALS, INC., d/b/a DEVOS CHILDREN’S HOSPITAL, Defendants-Appellants,

and

MICHAEL ROCHOWIAK, D.O., ALBERTO BETANCOURT, M.D., CARSON CITY HOSPITAL, d/b/a CENTER FOR WOMEN’S HEALTH CARE, and CARSON CITY HOSPITAL, INC., Defendants-Appellees,

and

BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD, Intervening Plaintiff.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the motion for re consideration of this Court’s November
22, 2010 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it doe s not appear that the order was entered erroneously.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM                        .                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

Postal Service notice of filing of a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3).

# DATES:

December 27, 2010.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Elizabeth A. Reed, 202-268-3179.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that on December 16, 2010, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *Request of the United States Postal Service to Add Priority Mail Contract 31 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *http://www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2011-10, CP2011-46.                

Neva R. Watson,

Attorney, Legislative.

[FR Doc. 2010-32375 Filed 12-23-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
IV 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 795 

Condemning in the strongest terms the terrorist attacks in Dahab and 

Northern Sinai, Egypt, on April 24 and 26, 2006. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 3, 2006 

Mr. TOM DAVIS of Virginia (for himself, Mr. ISSA, Mr. WEXLER, Mr. WILSON

of South Carolina, Mr. BAIRD, Mr. MCDERMOTT, and Ms. WATSON) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 

International Relations 

RESOLUTION 

Condemning in the strongest terms the terrorist attacks in 

Dahab and Northern Sinai, Egypt, on April 24 and 

26, 2006. 

Whereas, on April 24 and 26, 2006, a series of explosions at 

Dahab and in Northern Sinai, Egypt, planned and carried out by terrorists, resulted in the deaths of scores of 

civilians and the injury of many others; 

Whereas the people of Egypt have been subjected to several 

other deadly terrorist attacks over the past years; and 

Whereas President George W. Bush called President Hosni 

Mubarak of Egypt to extend condolences on behalf of the 

American people for the loss of life: Now, therefore, be 

it 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 795 IH 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) condemns in the strongest terms the ter3 rorist attacks on Dahab and Northern Sinai, Egypt 

4 and other terrorist attacks directed against Egypt; 

5 (2) expresses its condolences to the families and 

6 friends of those individuals who were killed in the 

7 attacks and expresses its sympathies to those indi8 viduals who have been injured; 

9 (3) joins with President George W. Bush in ex10 pressing the solidarity of the people and Government 

11 of the United States with the people and Govern12 ment of Egypt as they recover from these cowardly 

13 and inhuman attacks; and 

14 (4) expresses its readiness to support the Egyp15 tian authorities in their efforts to bring to justice 

16 those individuals responsible for the recent attacks 

17 in Egypt and to pursue, disrupt, undermine, and 

18 dismantle the networks which plan and carry out 

19 such attacks. 

Æ 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
**THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS**

**Post Office Box 12248**

**Austin, Texas 78711**

**(512) 463-1312**

April 23, 2010

Mr. L. T. "Butch" Bradt

Teltschik Associates, P.C.

5151 San Felipe, Suite 1950

Houston, TX 77056

Mrs. Brenda Luebe

16418 Hill Country Drive

Conroe, TX 77302

Mr. John B. Worley

Office of the Attorney General

P.O. Box 12017 (M 038-1)

Austin, TX 78711

Ms. Elsie Martin-Simon

1915 Commonwealth, Ste. 203

Houston, TX 77006

Honorable Bonnie Crane Hellums

247th Judicial District Court

1115 Congress, 2nd Floor

Houston, TX 77002

RE:Case Number:  10-0255

Court of Appeals Number:  01-09-00908-CV

Trial Court Number:  96-36539

Style:IN RE  MARK D. LUEBE

Dear Counsel:

Relator’s petition for writ of habeas corpus filed on April 14, 2010, have been duly considered in chambers, The Supreme Court of Texas ordered relator be released, conditioned upon $250.00 bond and issued the enclosed order. The petition for writ of habeas corpus remains pending before this Court.   

Sincerely,

Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk

by Kathy Sandoval, Deputy Clerk

**Case No. 10-0255Page 2**