alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### SERVE D JANUAR Y 11,201 0 U.S

. DEPARTMEN T O F TRANSPORTATEMFTH ^ 

### ^POMIO H OFFIC E O FHEARING S ' WASHINGTON , D C

I N TH E MATTE RO F HELICOPTER S FLITE , INC. , Respondent

. FA A DOCKE T NO

. CP09EA001 5 (Civi l Penalt y Proceeding ) DM S NO

. FAA-2009-057 9
NOTIC E O FHEARIN G PLEAS E TAKE NOTIC E tha t th e hearin g i n thi s cas e wil l b e hel do n January 26 , 2010 , beginnin g a t 10:0 0 a.m. , loca l tim e at

th e followin g location : Cah n Federa l Buildin g 50 4 Hamilto n Stree t AllentownP A 1810 1 Allo w tim e t o pas s throug h security an dnot e tha t cameras , includin g cellular telephone s incorporatin g cameras , ar e no t allowe di n federal courthouses.

Isaa c D
. Benki n Administrativ e La w Judg e Attachment-Servic e Lis tFA A Docke t No
. CP09EA001 5 (Civi l Penalt

y Action ) SERVIC E LIS T ORIGINA L & ONE COP Y Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W

. Washington , D C 2059 1 Attention : Hearing Docke t Clerk , AGC-43 0 Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit

e 2W1000 ^ ONE COP Y Christophe r T
. Powell , Jr. , Respondent' s Counsel Powel l La w 52 7 Linde n Stree t Scranton , P

A 1850 3 TEL : 570-961-077 7 FAX : 570-342-123 2 Helicopter s Flite , Inc. , Responden t 19 0 Decke r Lane Weatherly , P

A 1825 5 Zachar y M
. Berman , Complainant' s Counsel Offic e of the Regiona

l Counsel Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 1 Aviation Plaz a Jamaica , N

Y 1143 4 TEL : 718-553-325 8 FAX : 718-995-569 9 Th e Honorable Isaa

c D
. Benkin , Administrativ e La w Judg e Offic e of Hearings , M-20 U.S

. Departmen

t o f Transportatio n 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E

. East Building Groun

dFloor , Roo

mEl2-32 0 Washington , D C 2059 0 TEL : Attorne

y 202-366-043 7 Lega l Assistan t 202-366-213 2 FAX : 202-366-753 6

' Servic e was b

y U.S

. Mail

. Fo

r servic e i n person o r b y expeditedcourier , us e tiie followin g address : Federa

l Aviation Administration , 600 Independenc e Avenue , S.W. , Wilbu r Wrigh t Building — Suit e 2W1000 , Washington , D

C 20591 , Attention : Hearing Docke t Clerk, AGC-430

.
Case 3:06-cv-00772-WKW-TFM Document 19 Filed 03/07/2007 Page 1 of 4
Case 3:06-cv-00772-WKW-TFM Document 19 Filed 03/07/2007 Page 2 of 4
Case 3:06-cv-00772-WKW-TFM Document 19 Filed 03/07/2007 Page 3 of 4
Case 3:06-cv-00772-WKW-TFM Document 19 Filed 03/07/2007 Page 4 of 4
#### § 1108.115 Co-principal investigator.

*Co-principal investigator* means any one of a group of individuals whom an organization that is carrying out a research project with DoD support designates as sharing the authority and responsibility for leading and directing the research intellectually and logistically, other than the one among the group identified as the primary contact for scientific, technical, and related budgetary matters (see the definition of “principal investigator”).
Editorial Note on Part 9
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 9 appear at 82 FR 52825, Nov. 15, 2017.

§ 9.43 Processing requests for a waiver or reduction of fees. ( a ) Within 20 working days after receipt of a request for access to agency records for which the NRC agrees to waive fees under § 9.39 (a) through (d) or § 9.41(c), the NRC will respond to the request as provided in § 9.25.
( b ) In making a request for a waiver or reduction of fees, a requester shall provide the information required by § 9.41(b).
( c ) After receipt of a request for the waiver or reduction of fees made in accordance with § 9.41, the NRC will either waive or reduce the fees and notify the requester of the NRC's intent to provide the agency records promptly or deny the request and provide a statement to the requester explaining why the request does not meet the requirements of § 9.41(b).
( d ) As provided in § 9.29, a requester may appeal a denial of a request to waive or reduce fees to the Executive Director for Operations. The appeal must be submitted within 90 calendar days from the date of the notice.
[63 FR 2876, Jan. 20, 1998, as amended at 70 FR 34308, June 14, 2005; 81 FR 96347, Dec. 30, 2016]
#### Roger Baillargeon et al., Respondents, v Kings County Waterproofing Corp. et al., Defendants, and Gordon H. Smith Corporation, Appellant.

[815 NYS2d 261]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant Gordon H. Smith Corporation appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (F. Rivera, J.), dated August 6, 2004, as denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The injured plaintiff allegedly slipped and fell on a wet floor while installing a carpet at the Jacob Javits Convention Center (hereinafter the Javits Center). The plaintiffs commenced this action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., alleging that prior to the accident the defendants had been hired by the Javits Center to repair a recurrent leaking condition of the glass roof and that the accident occurred as a result of their negligence in repairing the roof in the area where the injured plaintiff fell. The appellant moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it on the ground, inter alia, that the injured plaintiff could not identify what caused him to slip and fall.

The Supreme Court properly denied the appellant’s motion. The appellant failed to establish its prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law (see *Alvarez v Prospect Hosp.,*68 NY2d 320, 324 [1986]). The appellant did not dispute the plaintiffs’ allegations that it had attempted to repair the leaking roof prior to the accident. The appellant relied on selected portions of the injured plaintiffs deposition testimony that he did not observe any water on the floor either before or after the accident or on his clothing. However, the injured plaintiff also testified to a recurring condition of rain water and melting *839snow leaking from the glass roof onto the floor, that it had rained the prior evening, and that “his hand was in water” after the fall. In light of this testimony, questions of fact exist as to whether a dangerous condition existed on the floor which caused the injured plaintiff to slip and fall and, if so, whether the appellant created the dangerous condition by negligently repairing the roof *(see Doize v Holiday Inn Ronkonkoma,*6 AD3d 573, 574 [2004]). The appellant’s failure to make a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law required denial of its motion, regardless of the sufficiency of the plaintiffs’ opposing papers *(see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., supra*at 324). Florio, J.P., Crane, Goldstein and Spolzino, JJ., concur.
AAM-13-248-E

March 08, 2013

 Exemption No. 10718

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2013-0187

Mr. Brian K Coshatt

Express Helicopters, Inc.

P.O. Box 131373

Birmingham, AL 35213

Dear Mr. Coshatt:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our 

decision, explains its basis, and gives you the conditions and limitations of the exemption, 

including the date it ends.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated February 15, 2013, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) 

on behalf of Express Helicopters, Inc. (Express Helicopters) for an exemption from part 120

of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) to the extent necessary to allow Express

Helicopters to cover its safety-sensitive employees under one drug and alcohol testing 

program.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent, and any 

delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Express Helicopters.

The FAA has issued a grant of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to 

those presented in your petition. In Grant of Exemption No. 9703 (copy enclosed), the FAA 

found that Solid Edge’s § 91.147 air tour operations were closely connected to its part 135 

operations. The FAA also found that combining the petitioner’s two drug and alcohol testing 

programs into one would be in the public interest and would maintain an equivalent level of 
2

safety to that provided by the current regulations. Thus, the FAA concluded it was 

unnecessary to burden the petitioner by requiring it to conduct two separate testing programs.

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that—

 they are similar in all material respects to relief previously requested in the enclosed Grant 

of Exemption No. 9703;

 the reasons stated by the FAA for granting the enclosed Grant of Exemption No. 9703 also 

apply to the situation you present; and 

 a grant of exemption is in the public interest.

Our Decision

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator 

has delegated to me, I hereby grant Express Helicopters, Inc. an exemption from 14 CFR 

part 120 to the extent necessary to allow Express Helicopters to cover its safety-sensitive 

employees under one drug and alcohol testing program, subject to the conditions and 

limitations described below.

Conditions and Limitations 

1. Employees of Express Helicopters are subject to the drug and alcohol regulations 

at all times while conducting operations under part 135 or part 91.

2. The drug and alcohol program must be implemented under the same auspices of 

the Express Helicopters part 135 operation, not under part 91.

This exemption terminates on March 31, 2015, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/

James R. Fraser, M.D.

Deputy Federal Air Surgeon

Enclosure
#### § 1125.10 What does this part do?

This part adopts the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) guidance in subparts A through I of 2 CFR part 180, as supplemented by this part, as the Department of Defense (DoD) policies and procedures for nonprocurement debarment and suspension. It thereby gives regulatory effect for the Department of Defense to the OMB guidance as supplemented by this part. This part satisfies the requirements in section 3 of Executive Order 12549, “Debarment and Suspension” (3 CFR 1986 Comp., p. 189), Executive Order 12689, “Debarment and Suspension” (3 CFR 1989 Comp., p. 235) and 31 U.S.C. 6101 note (Section 2455, Public Law 103-355, 108 Stat. 3327).
# Materials Not Included in **Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket** Docket Number: FAA- 2012 - 0930 Directorate Identifier: 2011NM251AD

100 - 29 - 14 --- 12/16/10 SBIS 100 - 29 - 14 --- 12/22/10

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket 

### MA **Y BE VIEWED AT:** Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate Rules Docket 1601 Lind Ave. SW., Renton, WA 98057 425.227.1221 **DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Form Date: 0 3/05/2008
Order entered December 19 , 2022

In The 

### Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**
No. 05
- 22
- 00116
- CR
JEREMIAH ROBINSON , Appellant
V. THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee On Appeal from the Crimi nal District Court No. 5 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F17
- 33830 -L
O RDER Appellant’s brief is overdue. The brief was due September 3, 2022. We notified appellant’s counsel on September 9, 2022, by postcard that the brief was overdue and di rected counsel to file within ten days both appellant’s brief and an extension motion. We cautioned counsel that if the brief and an extension motion were not filed, we would order the trial court to conduct a hearing. On September 12, 2022, appellant fi led a motion for extension of time to file the brief, and on September 15, 2022, we ordered appellant to file the brief by October 18, 2022.On October 31, 2022, appellant filed a second motion for extension of time to file the brief. On November 2, 2022 , we ordered appellant to file the brief by November 30, 2022. We cautioned appellant that if he failed to file the brief by November 30, 2022, this Court might abate the appeal for a hearing in the trial court to determine why the brief has not been file d. As of the date of this order, neither the brief nor a further motion for extension has been filed

. The Court ORDERS the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine why appellant’s brief has not been filed. In this regard, the trial court shall mak e appropriate findings and recommendations and determine whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeals, whether appellant has abandoned the appeals, or whether appointed counsel has abandoned the appeals. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P

. 38.8( b ). If the trial co urt cannot obtain appellant’s presence at the hearing, the trial court shall conduct the hearing in appellant’s absence. See Meza v. State , 742 S.W.2d 708 (Tex. App.

– Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.) (per curiam). If appellant is indigent, the trial court is ORDERED to take such measures as may be necessary to assure effective representation, which may include appointment of new counsel.
We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record of the proceedings, which shall include written findings and recommendations, to this Court within THIRTY
DAYS of the date of this order.We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order to the Honorable Carter Thompson, Presiding Judge, Criminal District Court No. 5, and to counsel for all parties. This appeal is ABATED to allow t he trial court to comply with the above order. The appeals shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are received, whichever is earlier.

/s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE
#### § 1104.1 Purpose of this part.

This part provides an update to the DoD interim implementation of Office of Management and Budget (OMB) guidance in 2 CFR part 200. It supersedes the initial interim implementation of that guidance that DoD adopted in 2 CFR part 1103 on December 19, 2014.
Para más información

El Departamento de Agricultura de los Estados Unidos

es un proveedor y empleador que ofrece igualdad de

oportunidades para todos.

United States Department of Agriculture

Food and Nutrition Service

FNS-322-S

April 2001

Recuerde

El Programa de Servicio de Alimentos de

Verano sirve comidas con leche, carne, frutas,

verduras y pan.

Todas las comidas y las meriendas cumplen

con los requisitos nutritivos especificados por

el USDA.

La comida es gratis para niños hasta los 18

años de edad.

Los niños pueden comer hasta 3 comidas al día.

Las comidas son servidas en un lugar

supervisado cerca de donde usted vive.

Ayuda a 

familias 

migratorias

Programa de Servicio

de Alimentos de

Verano

Provee buenas comidas 

para sus niños

Nota para los patrocinadores

El Programa de Servicio de Alimentos de

Verano de USDA (SFSP por sus siglás en

inglés) provee comidas y meriendas gratis

para niños de familias de bajos ingresos

económicos, que tengan 18 años o menos,

durante las vacaciones escolares. Para

sitios del SFSP que sirven por la mayor

parte a niños de familias migratorias, el

establecer eligibilidad es más fácíl, los

horarios del servicio de las comidas son

más flexibles, y los pagos administrativos

son a menudo más altos. Aún más

importante es que los niños de familias

migratorias pueden recibir hasta 3

comidas reembosables cada día.
Sus hijos no van a la escuela porque están de vacaciones.

¿Donde pueden ellos continuar recibiendo una buena 

alimentación mientras usted está trabajando?

Beneficios para los niños

En el Programa de Servicio de Alimentos

de Verano, los niños tienen un lugar donde

ir para:

• recibir una alimentación nutritiva,

• participar en actividades planificadas,

• jugar con otros niños.

El Programa de Servicio de Alimentos de

Verano es para niños hasta los 18 años de

edad.

Usted no tiene que llenar ninguna

aplicación.

Desayuno, almuerzo y hasta

cena

Las comidas tienen todo lo bueno que

necesitan los niños para crecer fuertes y

saludables.

Los niños comen en un lugar cercano a su

casa.

Los niños pueden comer desayuno,

almuerzo, cena o meriendas, dependiendo

de lo que provea el lugar donde el niño va

a comer.

Sus niños pueden recibir comidas gratis

cada día, y de esta manera usted podrá

tener dinero adicional para poder comprar

alimentos para toda la familia.

Comidas saludables y gratis

El Programa de Servicio de Alimentos de

Verano (Summer Food Service Program)

de USDA proporciona a sus niños buenos

alimentos para comer y en un sitio cercano

al lugar donde usted vive.

Los niños necesitan una buena

alimentación durante todo el año, aún

cuando no estan en la escuela.

El Programa de Servicio de Alimentos de

Verano provee comidas saludables y

gratuitas a los niños.

Sus niños reciben los alimentos que ellos

necesitan para aprender, jugar, y crecer

durante las vacaciones escolares cuando no

pueden comer en la escuela.
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of SITI-Sites.com, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), We,
Lawrence M. Powers, Chief Executive Officer and Toni Ann Tantillo, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


                                                /s/ Lawrence M. Powers
                                                ----------------------
                                                Lawrence M. Powers
                                                Chief Executive Officer


                                                /s/ Toni Ann Tantillo
                                                ---------------------
                                                Toni Ann Tantillo
                                                Chief Financial Officer

November 12, 2004


                                       15
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          99,034
<SECURITIES>                                       426
<RECEIVABLES>                                   26,575
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               126,035
<PP&E>                                       3,011,349
<DEPRECIATION>                                 999,105
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,138,279
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           23,721
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,976,605
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,138,279
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               238,856
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  113,032
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                125,824
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            125,824
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   125,824
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.75
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.75


</TABLE>
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 163 (Thursday, August 22, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 52230]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-20522]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8433]

 Designation of Mohamed Lahbous, also known as Lahbous Mohamed, 
also known as Mohamed Ennouini, also known as Hassan, also known as 
Hocine, as a Specially Designated Global Terrorist Pursuant to Section 
1(b) of Executive Order 13224, as Amended

    Acting under the authority of and in accordance with section 1(b) 
of Executive Order 13224 of September 23, 2001, as amended by Executive 
Order 13268 of July 2, 2002, and Executive Order 13284 of January 23, 
2003, I hereby determine that the individual known as Mohamed Lahbous, 
also known as Lahbous Mohamed, also known as Mohamed Ennouini, also 
known Hassan, also known as Hocine, committed, or poses a significant 
risk of committing, acts of terrorism that threaten the security of 
U.S. nationals or the national security, foreign policy, or economy of 
the United States.
    Consistent with the determination in section 10 of Executive Order 
13224 that ``prior notice to persons determined to be subject to the 
Order who might have a constitutional presence in the United States 
would render ineffectual the blocking and other measures authorized in 
the Order because of the ability to transfer funds instantaneously,'' I 
determine that no prior notice needs to be provided to any person 
subject to this determination who might have a constitutional presence 
in the United States, because to do so would render ineffectual the 
measures authorized in the Order.

    This notice shall be published in the Federal Register.

    Dated: August 7, 2013.
John F. Kerry,
Secretary of State.
[FR Doc. 2013-20522 Filed 8-21-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-10-P
```
#### § 73.5 Specific exemptions.

The Commission may, upon application of any interested person or upon its own initiative, grant such exemptions from the requirements of the regulations in this part as it determines are authorized by law and will not endanger life or property or the common defense and security, and are otherwise in the public interest.
PGI SUBPART 16.5 – INDEFINITE-DELIVERY

CONTRACTS

(Revised January 11, 2022 through PROCLTR 2021-15)

Parent topic: PGI PART 16 – TYPES OF CONTRACTS

PGI 16.504 Indefinite-quantity contracts.

(a)(1)(S-90) Establishing guaranteed minimum quantities and recording obligations.

(B) Monthly review and reporting. Procuring organizations shall access Guaranteed Minimum

(https://dlamil.dps.mil/sites/Acquisition/Shared%20Documents/Forms/AllItems.aspx?viewid=e9b411

26%2Dd28f%2D4f87%2Da9f7%2Dddf914a82406&id=%2Fsites%2FAcquisition%2FShared%20Docu

ments%2FGuaranteed%20Minimum); and

(i) Use instructions to query guaranteed minimums in ECC and SRM; and

(ii) Complete the Procuring Org Monthly Reporting Template and submit to the DLA Acquisition

Procurement Process & Systems Division on a monthly basis (by the 10th of the month for the

preceding month).