alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 11-3810

___________________________

Guy Clayton Barnes

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant

v.

Arkansas Department of Correction; Danny Burl, originally sued as Burls; John

Belken, originally sued as Belkens; James Bell, originally sued as J.W. Bell;

Theaster Petty, originally sued as Pettie

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees

____________

 Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Helena

____________

 Submitted: July 24, 2012

 Filed: August 16, 2012

[Unpublished]

____________

Before LOKEN, BOWMAN, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.
Inmate Guy Clayton Barnes appeals from the order of the District Court

1

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. 

Upon de novo review, we conclude that dismissal without prejudice was warranted. 

See Hammett v. Cofield, 681 F.3d 945, 946 (8th Cir. 2012) (per curiam) (standard of

review). It is clear from the record that Barnes’s grievance appeal was not decided

on the merits but was denied because it was untimely. Cf. id. at 947 (adopting the

position “that the PLRA’s exhaustion requirement is satisfied if prison officials

decide a procedurally flawed grievance on the merits”). And while inmates cannot

be held to exhaustion requirements when prison officials keep them from pursuing

their administrative remedies, see Miller v. Norris, 247 F.3d 736, 740 (8th Cir. 2001),

Barnes fell short of showing that such remedies were made unavailable to him. We

affirm the District Court, and we deny Barnes’s pending motions for default

judgment. 

______________________________

The Honorable J. Leon Holmes, United States District Judge for the Eastern 1

District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable

Jerome T. Kearney, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of

Arkansas.

-2-
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 19

- 00326

- CR
Oscar Davila Rodriguez v. The State of Texas
On Appeal from the 139th District Court of Hidalgo County , Texas Trial Court Cause No. CR

- 0084

- 06

- C

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having consid ered this cause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed

. The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED

. We further order this decision certified below for observance. May 26 , 2022
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>   5
<LEGEND> 
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED 
FROM THE REGISTRANT'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 
1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN SUCH REPORT.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                            9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                       SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                                    3558
<SECURITIES>                                          28511954
<RECEIVABLES>                                                0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                 0
<INVENTORY>                                                  0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                      28515512
<PP&E>                                                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                                               0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                        28515512
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                   176131
<BONDS>                                                      0
<COMMON>                                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                        0
<PREFERRED>                                                  0
<OTHER-SE>                                            28339381
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                          28515512
<SALES>                                                      0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       1770961
<CGS>                                                        0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                           348947
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        236226
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                           0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                        1185788
<INCOME-TAX>                                           1185788
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    1185788
<DISCONTINUED>                                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                              0
<CHANGES>                                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                                           1185788
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                0


        

</TABLE>
! "# # % &' ()* + , - . /0 (' + (, 1 - 2 3 
 ! "# # % &' ()* + , - . /0 (' + (, 1 - 2 3 !
 ! "# # % &' ()* + , - . /0 (' + (, 1 - 2 3 "
 ! "# # % &' ()* + , - . /0 (' + (, 1 - 2 3 #
 ! "# # % &' ()* + , - . /0 (' + (, 1 - 2 3 $
 ! "# # % &' ()* + , - . /0 (' + (, 1 - 2 3 %
 ! "# # % &' ()* + , - . /0 (' + (, 1 - 2 3 &
 ! "# # % &' ()* + , - . /0 (' + (, 1 - 2 3 '
 ! "# # % &' ()* + , - . /0 (' + (, 1 - 2 3 (
 ! "# # % &' ()* + , - . /0 (' + (, 1 - 2 3 )
 ! "# # % &' ()* + , - . /0 (' + (, 1 - 2 3 
 ! "# # % &' ()* + , - . /0 (' + (, 1 - 2 3 !
 ! "# # % &' ()* + , - . /0 (' + (, 1 - 2 3 "
 ! "# # % &' ()* + , - . /0 (' + (, 1 - 2 3 #
 ! "# # % &' ()* + , - . /0 (' + (, 1 - 2 3 $
 ! "# # % &' ()* + , - . /0 (' + (, 1 - 2 3 %
 ! "# # % &' ()* + , - . /0 (' + (, 1 - 2 3 &
 ! "# # % &' ()* + , - . /0 (' + (, 1 - 2 3 '
 ! "# # % &' ()* + , - . /0 (' + (, 1 - 2 3 (
 ! "# # % &' ()* + , - . /0 (' + (, 1 - 2 3 ! )
 ! "# # % &' ()* + , - . /0 (' + (, 1 - 2 3 ! 
 ! "# # % &' ()* + , - . /0 (' + (, 1 - 2 3 ! !
 ! "# # % &' ()* + , - . /0 (' + (, 1 - 2 3 ! "
 ! "# # % &' ()* + , - . /0 (' + (, 1 - 2 3 ! #
 ! "# # % &' ()* + , - . /0 (' + (, 1 - 2 3 ! $
 ! "# # % &' ()* + , - . /0 (' + (, 1 - 2 3 ! %
 ! "# # % &' ()* + , - . /0 (' + (, 1 - 2 3 ! &
 ! "# # % &' ()* + , - . /0 (' + (, 1 - 2 3 ! '
 ! "# # % &' ()* + , - . /0 (' + (, 1 - 2 3 ! (
 ! "# # % &' ()* + , - . /0 (' + (, 1 - 2 3 " )
 ! "# # % &' ()* + , - . /0 (' + (, 1 - 2 3 " 
 ! "# # % &' ()* + , - . /0 (' + (, 1 - 2 3 " !
 ! "# # % &' ()* + , - . /0 (' + (, 1 - 2 3 " "
 ! "# # % &' ()* + , - . /0 (' + (, 1 - 2 3 " #
 ! "# # % &' ()* + , - . /0 (' + (, 1 - 2 3 " $
 ! "# # % &' ()* + , - . /0 (' + (, 1 - 2 3 " %
 ! "# # % &' ()* + , - . /0 (' + (, 1 - 2 3 " &
 ! "# # % &' ()* + , - . /0 (' + (, 1 - 2 3 " '
 ! "# # % &' ()* + , - . /0 (' + (, 1 - 2 3 " (
 ! "# # % &' ()* + , - . /0 (' + (, 1 - 2 3 # )
 ! "# # % &' ()* + , - . /0 (' + (, 1 - 2 3 # 
 ! "# # % &' ()* + , - . /0 (' + (, 1 - 2 3 # !
 ! "# # % &' ()* + , - . /0 (' + (, 1 - 2 3 # "
 ! "# # % &' ()* + , - . /0 (' + (, 1 - 2 3 # #
 ! "# # % &' ()* + , - . /0 (' + (, 1 - 2 3 # $
 ! "# # % &' ()* + , - . /0 (' + (, 1 - 2 3 # %
 ! "# # % &' ()* + , - . /0 (' + (, 1 - 2 3 # &
 ! "# # % &' ()* + , - . /0 (' + (, 1 - 2 3 # '
 ! "# # % &' ()* + , - . /0 (' + (, 1 - 2 3 # (
 ! "# # % &' ()* + , - . /0 (' + (, 1 - 2 3 $ )
 ! "# # % &' ()* + , - . /0 (' + (, 1 - 2 3 $ 

4 / + )' (/ 4 /5 6 5 / 7 + 689 / : ( ; / (: 5 : 5 < ; / (:
 ! "# # % &' ()* + , - . /0 (' + (, 1 - 2 3 $ !

9 /& 8= >/ ? @ A @ ? ? B C B D D E ? F . G 3 @ H I E D E D J J @D A F C E K B
IV 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 661 

Encouraging States to establish programs to award high school diplomas 

to veterans who left high school before receiving diplomas in order 

to serve in the Armed Forces during a time of war. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 31, 2006 

Mr. PALLONE (for himself, Mrs. JONES of Ohio, Mr. FITZPATRICK of Pennsylvania, Mr. SALAZAR, Mr. GRIJALVA, Ms. HARRIS, Mrs. MCCARTHY, and 

Mrs. CHRISTENSEN) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce 

RESOLUTION 

Encouraging States to establish programs to award high 

school diplomas to veterans who left high school before 

receiving diplomas in order to serve in the Armed Forces 

during a time of war. 

Whereas in October 2000, New Jersey established Operation 

Recognition, a program to honor veterans of World War 

I, World War II, the Korean War, and the Vietnam War 

who left high school in order to join the Armed Forces 

and never received high school diplomas; 

Whereas through Operation Recognition the State of New 

Jersey will award a high school diploma to any veteran 

residing in New Jersey who left a high school located in 

New Jersey before graduating to enter the Armed Forces 
2 

•HRES 661 IH 

during World War I, World War II, the Korean War, or 

the Vietnam War; and 

Whereas New York, Connecticut, Florida, Georgia, Iowa, 

Massachusetts, Minnesota, Nebraska, North Carolina, 

Wisconsin, and West Virginia have established programs 

similar to Operation Recognition: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives encour2 ages each State to establish a program similar to Oper3 ation Recognition, to award high school diplomas to vet4 erans who left high school in order to serve in the Armed 

5 Forces during a time of war and who never received high 

6 school diplomas. 

Æ
EXHIBIT 99.1

                                  CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
           AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         I, Stephen L. Brown,  as Chief  Executive  Officer of Franklin  Capital
Corporation (the "COMPANY") certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

         (1) the  accompanying  Form 10-Q report for the period ending March 31,
2003 as filed with the U.S.  Securities and Exchange  Commission  (the "REPORT")
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         (2) the  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated:  May 14, 2003                   /s/ STEPHEN L. BROWN
                                       --------------------
                                       Stephen L. Brown
                                       Chairman and Chief Executive Officer



A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided  to  Franklin  Capital  Corporation  and will be  retained  by Franklin
Capital  Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange  Commission or
its staff upon request.
#### Edward L. Melton et al., Respondents, v. South Shore U-Drive, Inc., et al., Appellants.

In an action to recover damages for the loss of plaintiff’s pedigreed Collie show dog, defendants' appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, entered December 20, 1968 upon a jury verdict, as included a recovery against them based upon the jury’s award of $8,000 for the loss of prospective stud fees (appellants’ brief asks for no relief from so much of the judgment as is based on the jury award of $7,000 for the market value of the dog). Judgment reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs to appellants; accordingly, the jury’s award of. $8,000 for the loss of prospective stud fees *951is vacated; and case remitted to the trial court for entry of an amended judgment in accordance herewith. The findings of fact below have not been affirmed. In our opinion there can be no additional recovery for loss of prospective stud fees. The jury’s award for the full market value of the dog fully compensates plaintiffs (see *Rimbaud*v. *Beiermeister,*168 App. Div. 596; *Kling*v. *United States Fire Ins. Co.,*146 So. 2d 635 [La. App.]). Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, Rabin, Benjamin and Martuscello, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 249 (Wednesday, December 29, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 81998]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-32758]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Navy


Meeting of the Independent Panel To Review the Judge Advocate 
Requirements of the Department of the Navy; Correction

AGENCY: Department of the Navy, DoD.

ACTION: Notice of open meetings; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Independent Panel to Review the Judge Advocate 
Requirements of the Department of the Navy (DoN) (hereinafter referred 
to as the Panel) published a document in the Federal Register of 
December 17, 2010, concerning an open meeting. The document contained 
an incorrect time for the Panel meeting.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Frank A. Putzu, Designated Federal 
Official, Department of the Navy, Office of the General Counsel, Naval 
Sea Systems Command, Office of Counsel, 1333 Isaac Hull Avenue, SE., 
Washington Navy Yard, Building 197, Room 4W-3153, Washington, DC 20376, 
via Telephone: 202-781-3097; Fax: 202-781-4628; or E-mail: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#650317040b0e4b1510111f10250b04131c4b080c09"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="751307141b1e5b0500010f00351b14030c5b181c19">[email protected]</span></a>.

Correction

    In the Federal Register of December 17, 2010, in FR Doc. 2010-
31797, on page 78979, in the second column, correct the DATES caption 
to read:

DATES: The meeting will be held on Friday, January 7th, 2011, from 1 
p.m. to 5 p.m.

    Dated: December 21, 2010.
D. J. Werner,
Lieutenant Commander, Office of the Judge Advocate General, U.S. Navy, 
Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010-32758 Filed 12-28-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3810-FF-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

IN THE INTEREST OF: S.W., A MINOR 

PETITION OF: S.W., A MINOR, AND 

ALLEGHENY COUNTY OFFICE OF 

CHILDREN, YOUTH AND FAMILIES 

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 127 WAL 2024

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 22nd day of May, 2024, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

GRANTED. The issue, rephrased for clarity, is:

(1) Whether the judicially created “prospective adoptive parent” exception to

the general prohibition against foster parents participating in dependency

cases was abrogated by the Legislature’s subsequent enactment of Section

6336.1(a) of the Juvenile Act, which provides that preadoptive foster

parents shall not have standing in the matter absent an award of legal

custody of the child?
CASE ANNOUNCEMENTS

*January 23, 2008*

[Cite as *01/23/2008 Case Announcements,*2008-Ohio-153.]

MERIT DECISIONS WITHOUT OPINIONS

2007-1962.

#### Bunting v. Bobby.

In Prohibition. On answer of respondents and motion for judgment on the pleadings. Motion for judgment on the pleadings granted. Cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 375 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
H. Res. 375

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                          June 7, 2017.
    Resolved, That at any time after adoption of this resolution the Speaker 
may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XVIII, declare the House resolved into the 
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of the 
bill (H.R. 10) to create hope and opportunity for investors, consumers, and 
entrepreneurs by ending bailouts and Too Big to Fail, holding Washington and 
Wall Street accountable, eliminating red tape to increase access to capital and 
credit, and repealing the provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act that make America 
less prosperous, less stable, and less free, and for other purposes. The first 
reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. All points of order against 
consideration of the bill are waived. General debate shall be confined to the 
bill and shall not exceed 90 minutes equally divided and controlled by the chair 
and ranking minority member of the Committee on Financial Services. After 
general debate the bill shall be considered for amendment under the five-minute 
rule. In lieu of the amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the 
Committee on Financial Services now printed in the bill, it shall be in order to 
consider as an original bill for the purpose of amendment under the five-minute 
rule the amendment in the nature of a substitute printed in part A of the report 
of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution. That amendment in the 
nature of a substitute shall be considered as read. All points of order against 
that amendment in the nature of a substitute are waived. No amendment to that 
amendment in the nature of a substitute shall be in order except those printed 
in part B of the report of the Committee on Rules. Each such amendment may be 
offered only in the order printed in the report, may be offered only by a Member 
designated in the report, shall be considered as read, shall be debatable for 
the time specified in the report equally divided and controlled by the proponent 
and an opponent, shall not be subject to amendment, and shall not be subject to 
a demand for division of the question in the House or in the Committee of the 
Whole. All points of order against such amendments are waived. At the conclusion 
of consideration of the bill for amendment the Committee shall rise and report 
the bill to the House with such amendments as may have been adopted. Any Member 
may demand a separate vote in the House on any amendment adopted in the 
Committee of the Whole to the bill or to the amendment in the nature of a 
substitute made in order as original text. The previous question shall be 
considered as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to final passage 
without intervening motion except one motion to recommit with or without 
instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM BNP
RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES, INC. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE SIX MONTHS
ENDED JUNE 30, 2000, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         927,287
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,177,004
<PP&E>                                     244,277,314
<DEPRECIATION>                             (29,289,466)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             221,632,408
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,219,312
<BONDS>                                    150,945,109
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    69,764,224
<OTHER-SE>                                 (22,590,400)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               221,632,408
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            16,937,017
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                8,420,939
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,615,877
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           5,508,707
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,070,442
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,070,442
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,070,442
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.19



</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 784 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 784

Commending and supporting Radio Al Mahaba, Iraq's first and only radio 
                           station for women.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 2006

 Mrs. McCarthy (for herself, Mr. Osborne, Mrs. Tauscher, Ms. Granger, 
Ms. Solis, Ms. Ros-Lehtinen, and Mr. Ackerman) submitted the following 
   resolution; which was referred to the Committee on International 
                               Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Commending and supporting Radio Al Mahaba, Iraq's first and only radio 
                           station for women.

Whereas Radio Al Mahaba, Iraq's first and only radio station for women, went on 
        the air on April 1, 2005;
Whereas Radio Al Mahaba is an educational tool, broadcasting in three different 
        languages and giving women freedom to voice opinions and hear other 
        opinions;
Whereas Radio Al Mahaba airs shows dedicated to women's rights and women's 
        issues;
Whereas such shows are devoted to relationships, parenting, and other social 
        topics;
Whereas despite terrible risks, the staff of Radio Al Mahaba works at the 
        station because they want to reach out and touch peoples' lives, and 
        they want to give hope, knowledge, empowerment, support, and a passage 
        to freedom to Iraq women;
Whereas Radio Al Mahaba, amid the struggles in Iraq, has followed the examples 
        of the United States which guarantees freedoms of speech and the press, 
        thereby encouraging Iraqis to build an open, democratic civil society;
Whereas Radio Al Mahaba has a positive, important role in educating women;
Whereas Radio Al Mahaba provides women with freedom of speech;
Whereas Radio Al Mahaba provides an opportunity for women to secure their role 
        in the governance of a civil society within Iraq; and
Whereas Radio Al Mahaba meets a palpable need of Iraqi women: Now, therefore, be 
        it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) commends the efforts of Radio Al Mahaba to provide 
        Iraqi women with freedom of speech and an opportunity for women 
        to be included in and informed of the reconstruction of Iraq 
        with an open, democratic civil society;
            (2) supports the mission of Radio Al Mahaba; and
            (3) urges Al Mahaba to continue its important work.
                                 <all>
```