alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 527 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 527

 Expressing support for designation of the week of September 18, 2017, 
       through September 24, 2017, as ``Balance Awareness Week''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 14, 2017

Ms. Eddie Bernice Johnson of Texas submitted the following resolution; 
       which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Expressing support for designation of the week of September 18, 2017, 
       through September 24, 2017, as ``Balance Awareness Week''.

Whereas vestibular (inner-ear-balance) disorders are underdiagnosed and 
        undertreated;
Whereas, as many as 35 percent of adults 40 years of age and older in the United 
        States, approximately 69,000,000 people in the United States, have 
        experienced some form of vestibular dysfunction;
Whereas 80 percent of people 65 years of age and older have experienced 
        dizziness;
Whereas vestibular disorder patients may consult 4 or more physicians and spend 
        50 months or more in their search for a diagnosis;
Whereas the Vestibular Disorders Association celebrates ``Balance Awareness 
        Week'' to reduce the time it takes to diagnose a vestibular disorder by 
        helping patients recognize their symptoms and encouraging them to seek 
        help from a qualified vestibular specialist; and
Whereas the week of September 18, 2017, through September 24, 2017, would be an 
        appropriate week to designate as ``Balance Awareness Week'': Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) supports the designation of ``Balance Awareness Week''; 
        and
            (2) recognizes the importance of raising public awareness 
        about vestibular disorders.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 31.2

              SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


I, Philip S. Payne, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of BNP Residential
Properties, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

      (a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
      disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
      to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
      its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
      prepared;

      (b)Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
      procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
      effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
      the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

      (c)Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
      control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
      most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably
      likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over
      financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors:

      (a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
      operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
      reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
      process, summarize and report financial information; and

      (b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
      over financial reporting.



November 7, 2003                         /s/ Philip S. Payne
                                     -----------------------------------------
                                     Philip S. Payne
                                     Executive Vice President and
                                     Chief Financial Officer


                                       27
<PAGE>
#### § 183.30 Access to records.

In addition to any other existing examination-of-records authority, the Federal Government is authorized to examine any records of the recipient and its subawards, to the extent necessary, to ensure that funds, including supplies and services, received under a covered grant or cooperative agreement (see § 183.35) are not provided directly or indirectly to a covered person or entity in accordance with Never Contract with the Enemy. The Federal awarding agency may only exercise this authority upon a written determination by the Federal awarding agency that relies on a finding by the commander of a covered combatant command that there is reason to believe that funds, including supplies and services, received under the grant or cooperative agreement may have been provided directly or indirectly to a covered person or entity.
#### § 600.143 Competition.

All procurement transactions shall be conducted in a manner to provide, to the maximum extent practical, open and free competition. The recipient shall be alert to organizational conflicts of interest as well as noncompetitive practices among contractors that may restrict or eliminate competition or otherwise restrain trade. In order to ensure objective contractor performance and eliminate unfair competitive advantage, contractors that develop or draft specifications, requirements, statements of work, invitations for bids and/or requests for proposals shall be excluded from competing for such procurements. Awards shall be made to the bidder or offeror whose bid or offer is responsive to the solicitation and is most advantageous to the recipient, price, quality and other factors considered. Solicitations shall clearly set forth all requirements that the bidder or offeror shall fulfill in order for the bid or offer to be evaluated by the recipient. Any and all bids or offers may be rejected when it is in the recipient's interest to do so.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Bryant Howard, Appellant.

[814 NYS2d 544]

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from two sentences of the County Court, Suffolk County (Doyle, J.), both imposed March 28, 2005.

Ordered that the sentences are affirmed *(see People v Robinson,*13 AD3d 399 [2004]; *People v Mejia,*6 AD3d 630 [2004]). Schmidt, J.P., Goldstein, Rivera and Lifson, JJ., concur.
§ 835.601 General requirements. ( a ) Except as otherwise provided in this subpart, postings and labels required by this subpart shall include the standard radiation warning trefoil in black or magenta imposed upon a yellow background.
( b ) Signs required by this subpart shall be clearly and conspicuously posted and may include radiological protection instructions.
( c ) The posting and labeling requirements in this subpart may be modified to reflect the special considerations of DOE activities conducted at private residences or businesses. Such modifications shall provide the same level of protection to individuals as the existing provisions in this subpart.
[63 FR 59684, Nov. 4, 1998]
§ 1138.600 Purpose of SUB Article VI. SUB Article VI of the general terms and conditions specifies procurement provisions recipients must include in their subaward terms and conditions. It thereby: ( a ) Specifies which of the requirements in PROC Articles I through III of the award flow down to subawards; and
( b ) Implements OMB guidance in 2 CFR 200.317 through 200.326 and appendix II to 2 CFR part 200, as those portions of 2 CFR part 200 apply to subawards; and
( c ) Partially implements OMB guidance in 2 CFR 200.205(d), 200.213, and 200.517, as those sections of 2 CFR part 200 apply to subawards.
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications


I, David Nass, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D
required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on
Form 10-K of the UBS-Barclays Commercial Mortgage Trust 2013-C5 (the
"Exchange Act periodic reports");

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to
state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered
by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in
this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in
the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their
obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment
of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required
to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB
and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to
this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material
instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in
this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:

Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, as
Master Servicer, Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National
Association, as Special Servicer, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as
Trustee, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Certificate Administrator,
Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Custodian, Situs Holdings, LLC, as
Operating Advisor, KeyBank National Association (as successor to KeyCorp
Real Estate Capital Markets, Inc.), as Primary Servicer, and Bank of
America, National Association, as Primary Servicer.


        Dated: March 24, 2016


        /s/ David Nass


        President and Chief Executive Officer
        (senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
**Exhibit 23**

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 

The Board of Directors 

MEMC Electronic Materials, Inc.: 

We consent to the incorporation byreference in the registration statements (Nos. 33-96420, 333-19159, 333-43474, 333-83624, 333-83628, 333-100404, 333-122405, and 333-142818) on Form S-8 of MEMC Electronic Materials, Inc. of our reports dated February 27, 2009, with respect tothe consolidated balance sheets of MEMC Electronic Materials, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in thethree-year period ended December 31, 2008, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008, which reports appear in the December 31, 2008 annual report on Form 10-K of MEMC ElectronicMaterials, Inc. 

As discussed in Note 13 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS)No. 158, *Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans,* effective December 31, 2006, and the measurement date provisions as of December 31, 2008. 

As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 48, *Accounting forUncertainty in Income Taxes, an interpretation of Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 109,* effective January 1, 2007 and SFAS No. 157, *Fair Value Measurements,* as of January 1, 2008. 

/s/ KPMG LLP 

St. Louis, Missouri 

February 27, 2009
#### Joseph Geha, Plaintiff, v 55 Orchard Street, LLC, et al., Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs-Appellants. Strong Equipment, Third-Party Defendant-Respondent.

[815 NYS2d 253]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendants third-party plaintiffs appeal (1) from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Jones, J.), dated July 14, 2004, which granted the motion of the third-party defendant for summary judgment dismissing the third-party complaint, denied their cross motion for summary *736judgment, and dismissed the third-party complaint, and (2), as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the same court dated February 4, 2005, as denied that branch of their motion which was for leave to renew those branches of the third-party defendant’s prior motion and their cross motion which were for summary judgment on the third-party cause of action for common-law indemnification/contribution.

Ordered that the order and judgment is modified, on the law, by deleting the provision thereof granting that branch of the third-party defendant’s motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the third-party cause of action for contractual indemnification and substituting therefor a provision denying that branch of the motion; as so modified, the order and judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements, and that third-party cause of action is reinstated; and it is further,

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

The plaintiff, an employee of the third-party defendant, Strong Equipment (hereinafter Strong), allegedly sustained personal injuries while in the course of his employment. He commenced an action against 55 Orchard Street, LLC, and L&H Construction Company (hereinafter the appellants). The appellants commenced a third-party action against Strong, seeking common-law indemnification/contribution and contractual indemnification. Strong moved for summary judgment dismissing the third-party complaint. Thereafter, the appellants cross-moved for summary judgment. The Supreme Court granted Strong’s motion and denied the appellants’ cross motion. The appellants then moved, inter alia, for leave to renew those branches of the prior motion and cross motion which were for summary judgment on the common-law indemnification/ contribution causes of action. The Supreme Court denied their motion.

The Supreme Court erred in granting that branch of Strong’s motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the contractual indemnification cause of action. Although the subject written contract is unsigned, “an unsigned contract may be enforceable, provided there is objective evidence establishing that the parties intended to be bound” *(Flores v Lower E. Side Serv. Ctr., Inc.,*4 NY3d 363, 369 [2005]). Here, a triable issue of fact exists as to whether the indemnification provision in the subject written contract is enforceable.

The appellants’ remaining contentions are without merit. Schmidt, J.P., Santucei, Rivera and Skelos, JJ., concur.
WELLS
FARGO
 Corporate
Trust ServicesMAC
R1204-010 
9062 Old
Annapolis Road 
Columbia,
MD 21045

Tel:
410 884 2000 
Fax: 410 715 2380
    US
Bank N.A. 
190
South LaSalle Street 
7th
Floor 
Mail
Code: MK-IL-SL7R 
Chicago,
Illinois 60603
    RE:
Annual Statement of Compliance for Morgan Stanley 2013-C7

Per
the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of January 1, 2013 (the 
"Agreement"), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo
Bank, N.A., 
as Custodian ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows as of and for
the year ending 
December 31, 2013 (the "Reporting Period"):
  (a) A
review of Wells Fargo's activities during the Reporting Period and of
its 
performance
under the Agreement has been made under such officer's 
supervision; and 
(b) To the
best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has

fulfilled
all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects
throughout 
the Reporting Period.
   March
5, 2014 
/s/ Gail
Vannest 
Gail
Vannest, Vice President
   Wells
Fargo Bank, N.A.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                               76166
<SECURITIES>                                        692886
<RECEIVABLES>                                       206522
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                         581169
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   1589873
<PP&E>                                              271280
<DEPRECIATION>                                     (120501)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     2229029
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              1855902
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                            252
<COMMON>                                              1868
<OTHER-SE>                                         (306342)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       2229029
<SALES>                                            1271328
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   1271328
<CGS>                                               650220
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       650220
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   1224512
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   91606
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (572828)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (572828)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (572828)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         (.31)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         (.31)
        


</TABLE>
#### § 2701.93 Subrecipient.

SBA will only permit non-Federal entities to receive subawards where expressly authorized by statute.
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of BNP Residential Properties, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Philip
S. Payne, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.







  /s/ Philip S. Payne

Philip S. Payne

Executive Vice President and

Chief Financial Officer



August 12, 2003





                                       29
<PAGE>
**Exhibit 32.1**

**Certification of Chief Executive Officer Under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

The undersigned officer of First National Lincoln Corporation (the "Company") hereby certifies that the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007 to which this certification is being furnished as an exhibit (the "Report"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. This certification is provided pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K ("Item 601(b)(32)") promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"), and the Exchange Act. In accordance with clause (ii) of Item 601(b)(32), thiscertification (A) shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and (B) shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.

 

Date: May 10, 2007

 

/s/ Daniel R. Daigneault

Daniel R. Daigneault

President & Chief Executive Officer

First National Lincoln Corporation
#### PFAELZER, Appellant, v. BACH FUR CO. OF NEW YORK, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

November 27, 1914.)

Action by Morris Pfaelzer against the Bach Fur Company of New York. F. Gilbert, of New York City, for appellant. H. L. Scheuerman, of New York City, for respondent.

No opinion. Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Order filed.
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **CMBS Department**

 

MAC N9401-011

1055 10th Avenue SE

Minneapolis, MN 55414 |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc. 

1585 BROADWAY

NEW YORK, New York 10036-8200

 

RE: Annual Statement ofCompliance for Morgan Stanley Bank of America Merrill Lynch Trust 2013-C9,Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2013-C9

 

Per the Pooling and ServicingAgreement dated as of May 1, 2013 (the “Agreement”), theundersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Custodian(“Wells Fargo”), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the yearending December 31, 2016 (the “Reporting Period”):

 

(a) A review of WellsFargo’s activities during the Reporting Period and of its performanceunder the Agreement has been made under such officer’s supervision; and

 

(b) To the best of suchofficer’s knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled allof its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

 

February 27, 2017

 

/s/ Gail Vannest

GAIL VANNEST

Vice President

 

 

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.