alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 2245.500 Who in the Corporation determines that a recipient other than an individual violated the requirements of this part?

The Corporation's Chief Executive Officer or designee is authorized to make the determination under 2 CFR 182.500.
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 15

- 00037

- CR

DANNY CHARLES MORAN APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

----------

FROM CRIMINAL DISTRI CT COURT NO. 2 OF TA RRANT COUNTY

TRIAL COURT NO. 1369 231D

----------



### MEMORAN DUM OPINION 1

----------

After review of the reporter’s record of the trial court’s June 15, 2015

abatement hearing and pursuant to Appellant’s statement on record that he no

longer wishes to continue this appeal, this court, on its own initiative, suspends

the requirements of rule 42.2(a) of the rules of appellate procedure, and we

dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 2, 42.2(a), 43.2(f).

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.2 PER CURIAM

PANEL: GABRIEL, J; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and SUDDERTH, J.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVE RED: July 30, 2015
Editorial Note on Part 180
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 180 appear at 79 FR 75879, Dec. 19, 2014.

§ 180.930 Debarring official. *Debarring official* means an agency official who is authorized to impose debarment. A debarring official is either— ( a ) The agency head; or
( b ) An official designated by the agency head.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.01

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-3 (No. 333-34778) and on Form S-8 (No. 33-92902, No.
333-14323, No. 333-18871, No. 333-42819, No. 333-46875, No. 333-50623, No.
333-62195, No. 333-71923, No. 333-80965, No. 333-89165, No. 333-33952, No.
333-40344, No. 333-41388, No. 333-45442 and No. 333-55398) of HNC Software Inc.
of our report dated January 24, 2001, except as to Note 15, to which the date is
March 6, 2001, relating to the financial statements, which
appears in this Form 10-K.


/s/PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP


San Diego, California
March 28, 2001
# EUR-Lex - 31991D0185 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31991D0185

**91/185/EEC: Commission Decision of 18 March 1991 amending Decision 86/414/EEC as regards the list of establishments in Argentina approved for the purpose of importing meat products into the Community **

*
Official Journal L 091 , 12/04/1991 P. 0063 - 0064 *

COMMISSION DECISION of 18 March 1991 amending Decision 86/414/EEC as regards the list of establishments in Argentina approved for the purpose of importing meat products into the Community (91/185/EEC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community,

Having regard to Council Directive 72/462/EEC of 12 December 1972 on health and veterinary inspection problems upon importation of bovine animals and swine and fresh meat or meat products from third countries (1), as last amended by Directive 91/69/EEC (2), and in particular Article 4 (1) thereof,

Whereas a list of establishments in Argentina, approved for the purpose of importing meat products into the Community, was drawn up initially by Commission Decision 86/414/EEC (3), as last amended by Decision 91/92/EEC (4);

Whereas a Community on-the-spot visit to meat product establishments in Argentina has revealed that the level of hygiene in one establishment was altered since the last inspection; whereas the list of establishments should be amended accordingly;

Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Veterinary Committee,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION: Article 1

The Annex to Decision 86/414/EEC is hereby replaced by the Annex to this Decision. Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Member States. Done at Brussels, 18 March 1991. For the Commission

Ray MAC SHARRY

Member of the Commission (1) OJ No L 302, 31. 12. 1972, p. 28. (2) OJ No L 46, 19. 2. 1991, p. 37. (3) OJ No L 237, 23. 8. 1986, p. 36. (4) OJ No L 50, 23. 2. 1991, p. 25.

ANNEX

LIST OF ESTABLISHMENTS

Approval

No Establishment 'Frigorífico' Address 13 Swift Armour SA Argentina Rosario, Santa Fé 16 Regional Santa Elena SA Santa Elena, Entre Ríos 89 Carcarana SACI Carcarana, Santa Fé 239 Maciel Maciel, Santa Fé 249 Industrias Nelson SACIA Nelson, Santa Fé 1067 Mirab SA Pilar, Buenos Aires 1311 Frymat SAICFA Santa Fé, Santa Fé 1352 Meatex SA Alejandro Korn, Buenos Aires 1383 Barreca Hermanos Vivoratá, Buenos Aires 1399 FRÍA SAIC Casilda, Santa Fé 1822 Meatex SA Villa Ballester, Buenos Aires 1921 San Telmo SACIAFIF Mar del Plata, Buenos Aires 1930 Vizental y Cía SACIA San José, Entre Ríos 1964 Casasa SA Dolores, Buenos Aires 2052 Antártico SAIC González Catán, Buenos Aires 2067 Cía elaboradora de productos animales SA (CEPA) Pontevedra, Buenos Aires 2612 Nutryte SA Pilar, Buenos Aires
<PAGE>   1
Exhibit 11   Computation of Earnings Per Share



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                     THREE MONTHS ENDED
                                                                          MARCH 31,
                                                                -----------------------------
                                                                   1997              1996
                                                                -----------       -----------
<S>                                                             <C>               <C>
         PRIMARY EARNINGS PER SHARE:
            Weighted average and common equivalent shares        26,274,339        26,070,903
                                                                -----------       -----------
            Net income                                          $ 7,896,007       $ 9,848,110
                                                                ===========       ===========
            Net income per share                                $      0.30       $      0.38
                                                                ===========       ===========

         FULLY DILUTED:
            Weighted average and common equivalent shares        26,274,339        26,070,903
                                                                -----------       -----------
            Net income                                          $ 7,896,007       $ 9,848,110
                                                                ===========       ===========
            Net income per share                                $      0.30       $      0.38
                                                                ===========       ===========
</TABLE>


                                       32
#### § 2245.30 What policies and procedures must I follow?

(a) *General.* You must follow the policies and procedures specified in applicable sections of the OMB guidance in Subparts A through F of [2 CFR part 182](/on/2024-09-17/title-2/part-182), as implemented by this part.

(b) *Specific sections of OMB guidance that this part supplements.* In implementing the OMB guidance in [2 CFR part 182](/on/2024-09-17/title-2/part-182), this part supplements four sections of the guidance, as shown in the following table. For each of those sections, you must follow the policies and procedures in the OMB guidance, as supplemented by this part.

| Section of OMB guidance | Section in this part where supplemented | What the supplementation clarifies |
| --- | --- | --- |
| (1) [2 CFR 182.225(a)](/on/2024-09-17/title-2/section-182.225#p-182.225(a)) | § 2245.225 | Whom in the Corporation a recipient other than an individual must notify if an employee is convicted for a violation of a criminal drug statute in the workplace. |
| (2) [2 CFR 182.300(b)](/on/2024-09-17/title-2/section-182.300#p-182.300(b)) | § 2245.300 | Whom in the Corporation a recipient who is an individual must notify if he or she is convicted of a criminal drug offense resulting from a violation occurring during the conduct of any award activity. |
| (3) [2 CFR 182.500](/on/2024-09-17/title-2/section-182.500) | § 2245.500 | Who in the Corporation is authorized to determine that a recipient other than an individual is in violation of the requirements of [2 CFR part 182](/on/2024-09-17/title-2/part-182), as implemented by this part. |
| (4) [2 CFR 182.505](/on/2024-09-17/title-2/section-182.505) | § 2245.505 | Who in the Corporation is authorized to determine that a recipient who is an individual is in violation of the requirements of [2 CFR part 182](/on/2024-09-17/title-2/part-182), as implemented by this part. |

(c) *Sections of the OMB guidance that this part does not supplement.* For any section of OMB guidance in Subparts A through F of [2 CFR part 182](/on/2024-09-17/title-2/part-182) that is not listed in [paragraph (b)](/on/2024-09-17/title-2/section-2245.30#p-2245.30(b)) of this section, the Corporation's policies and procedures are the same as those in the OMB guidance.
###### Editorial Note on Part 9

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 9 appear at 82 FR 52825, Nov. 15, 2017.

#### § 9.109 Report to Congress.

The Secretary shall annually report to the Congress regarding the Commission's compliance with the Government in the Sunshine Act, including a tabulation of the total number of open meetings, the total number of closed meetings, the reasons for closing such meetings and a description of any litigation brought against the Commission pursuant to the Government in the Sunshine Act, including any cost assessed against the Commission in such litigation (whether or not paid by the Commission).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                       5


<MULTIPLIER>                    1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                               8,700
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      129,200
<ALLOWANCES>                                         6,200
<INVENTORY>                                         82,800
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   233,500
<PP&E>                                           1,125,600
<DEPRECIATION>                                     562,800
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,015,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              151,200
<BONDS>                                            924,700
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                           178,100
<OTHER-SE>                                        (267,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1,015,000
<SALES>                                            628,800
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   628,800
<CGS>                                              557,200
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      630,800
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     3,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  63,700
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (68,700)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       (26,300)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (42,400)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (42,400)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        (0.79)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0


</TABLE>
§ 200.346 Collection of amounts due. ( a ) Any funds paid to the non-Federal entity in excess of the amount to which the non-Federal entity is finally determined to be entitled under the terms of the Federal award constitute a debt to the Federal Government. If not paid within 90 calendar days after demand, the Federal awarding agency may reduce the debt by: ( 1 ) Making an administrative offset against other requests for reimbursements;
( 2 ) Withholding advance payments otherwise due to the non-Federal entity; or
( 3 ) Other action permitted by Federal statute.
( b ) Except where otherwise provided by statutes or regulations, the Federal awarding agency will charge interest on an overdue debt in accordance with the Federal Claims Collection Standards (31 CFR parts 900 through 999). The date from which interest is computed is not extended by litigation or the filing of any form of appeal.
InThe Matter Of: 

## SERVED: August 27, 2015 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OFHEARINGS WASIUNGTON, DC

.,.;.,.: ) ) ) ) ) ) DocketNo. FAA-2014-0867 BIRMINGHAM FLIGHT CENTER, INC. Respondent Case No. 2012S0090053

ORDER SETTING MOTION CONFERENCE

OnApril 7, 2015, an Order Setting Litigation Dates and Procedures was filed. OnAugust 25, 2015, the FAA filed a Motion to Amend Schedule to Extend Discovery and Set Deadlines for Dispositive Motions. Laterthat same day, August 25,2015, the Respondent, Birmingham Flight Center, Inc., filed the Respondent's Response to Administrator's Motion to Amendthe Court's Rule 16 Scheduling Order. OnAugust 27,2015, the FAA filed a Reply in Support ofMotionto Amend Schedule to Extend Discovery and Set Deadlines for Dispositive Motions. Laterthat same day, August 27,2015, the Office ofHearings attorney staffinformally contacted the parties by e-mail to determine their availability for a short-set Motion Conference. Bothparties responded that same day, and an agreed date was set. Pursuantto 14 C.F.R. 

### § 13.205(a)(1), (6) and (8), and after reviewing all relevant caselaw, regulation, statutory authority, and being fully advised;1 

### IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. August 31,2015 (1:30 p.m.- 2:30 p.m. ET): Motion Conference. The parties shall convene onMonday, August 31, 2015 (1:30 p.m. - 2:30 p.m. ET) for a Motion Conference topresent oral argument on the FAA's Motion. 2. Theparties shall access the Motion Conference by dialing 202-493-2343.

Attachment: Service ListDocketNo. FAA-2014-0867 (Civil Penalty Action) 

### SERVICE LIST- BY U.S. MAIL ORIGINAL & ONE COPY Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000 1 ONE COPY Mr. Christopher R. Stevenson Complainant's Counsel Federal AviationAdministration Office ofthe Regional Counsel, AS0-7 Southern Region 1701 ColumbiaAvenue College Park, GA 30337 TEL: 404-305-5200 FAX: 404-305-5223 Mr. Paul R. Borth Respondent's Counsel Barnett & Borth, LLC 800 Waukegan Road, Suite 200 Glenview, IL 60025-4387 TEL: 847-724-5520 FAX: 815-356-7042 Judge J.E. Sullivan U.S. AdministrativeLawJudge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-6941 FAX: 202-366-7536 Birmingham Flight Center, Inc. Respondent 4243 East Lake Blvd. Birmingham, AL 35217

1 Service was byU.S. Mail. For service in person orby expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
```

[Federal Register: August 20, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 161)]
[Notices]               
[Page 51518]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr20au10-101]                         

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 7127]

 
Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Picasso: Masterpieces from the Mus[eacute]e National 
Picasso, Paris''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 
236-3 of August 28, 2000, I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``Picasso: Masterpieces from the 
Mus[eacute]e National Picasso,'' imported from abroad for temporary 
exhibition within the United States, are of cultural significance. The 
objects are imported pursuant to a loan agreement with the foreign 
owner or custodian. I also determine that the exhibition or display of 
the exhibit objects at the Seattle Art Museum, Seattle, WA, from on or 
about October 8, 2010, until on or about January 17, 2011; at the 
Virginia Museum of Fine Arts, Richmond, VA, from on or about February 
19, 2011, until on or about May 15, 2011; at the Fine Arts Museums of 
San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, from on or about June 11, 2011, until 
on or about September 18, 2011; and at possible additional exhibitions 
or venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest. Public 
Notice of these Determinations is ordered to be published in the 
Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Carol B. Epstein, Attorney-
Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State 
(telephone: 202/632-6473). The address is U.S. Department of State, SA-
5, L/PD, Fifth Floor, Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: August 10, 2010.
Ann Stock,
Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, 
Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2010-20697 Filed 8-19-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
#### § 1532.1120 What is the purpose of CAA or CWA disqualification?

As provided for in Executive Order 11738 (3 CFR, 1973 Comp., p. 799), the purpose of CAA and CWA disqualification is to enforce the Federal Government's policy of undertaking Federal procurement and nonprocurement activities in a manner that improves and enhances environmental quality by promoting effective enforcement of the CAA or CWA.
§ 200.517 Audit documentation. ( a ) *Retention of audit documentation.* The auditor must retain audit documentation and reports for a minimum of three years after the date of issuance of the auditor's report(s) to the auditee, unless the auditor is notified in writing by the cognizant agency for audit, oversight agency for audit, cognizant agency for indirect costs, or pass-through entity to extend the retention period. When the auditor is aware that the Federal agency, pass-through entity, or auditee is contesting an audit finding, the auditor must contact the parties contesting the audit finding for guidance prior to destruction of the audit documentation and reports.
( b ) *Access to audit documentation.* Audit documentation must be made available upon request to the cognizant or oversight agency for audit or its designee, cognizant agency for indirect cost, a Federal agency, or GAO at the completion of the audit, as part of a quality review, to resolve audit findings, or to carry out oversight responsibilities consistent with the purposes of this part. Access to audit documentation includes the right of Federal agencies to obtain copies of audit documentation, as is reasonable and necessary.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Richard C. Bellis, Sr., Appellant.

Judgment insofar as it convicts defendant of rape, first degree, unanimously reversed and plea vacated, and matter remitted to Ontario County Court for further proceedings on that charge, and otherwise judgment affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant was charged with one count of rape in the first degree, two counts of sodomy in the first degree and two counts of sexual abuse in the first degree. Defendant’s counsel in open court in the defendant’s presence asked that the defendant’s not guilty plea be changed to a plea of guilty. After a brief catechism, in which defendant was advised of his right to a jury trial, the court inquired as to whether defendant desired to waive that right and plead guilty to the charges, to which defendant answered in the affirmative. When asked whether he had sexual intercourse with his daughter, the victim, defendant expressly denied engaging in sexual intercourse and stated that he had not entered her and that she was still a virgin. Defendant did admit to the acts of sodomy and sexual abuse charged. The fact that defendant did not actually say “Guilty” does not invalidate a plea of guilty. Acceptance of defendant’s plea of guilt, through counsel in open court and in defendant’s presence, is proper *(People v Sadness,*300 NY 69, cert den 338 US 952; *People v McGuire,*13 AD2d 794, cert den 368 US *866; People v Weires,*12 AD2d 679, affd 10NY2d 1017, cert den 370 US 954). However, before accepting a plea of guilty, where defendant’s statements do not establish the crime to which he is pleading, the court should take all precautions to assure that defendant is aware of what he is doing *(People v Serrano,*15 NY2d *304,308-310;People v Broach,*72 AD2d *748;People v Cullen,*57 AD2d 903,904; *People v Stone,*54 AD2d 918,919). Defendant did not admit to penetration which is an essential element of rape. The court should have advised defendant that his admissions were not consistent with the charge of rape and inquired further whether defendant nevertheless wished to plead guilty to avoid the risk of a jury verdict *(see North Carolina v Alford,*400 US 25). Consequently, the court improperly accepted defendant’s plea of guilty to the rape charge. However, defendant’s guilty plea was validly accepted on the other *1015charges. (Appeal from judgment of Ontario County Court — rape, first degree, and other charges.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Simons, Hancock, Jr., Callahan and Moule, JJ.
#### § 176.180 Procedure.

The award official shall insert the standard award term in this subpart in all awards funded in whole or in part with Recovery Act funds.
#### § 3374.1 Adoption of 2 CFR Part 200.

Under the authority listed above, the National Endowment for the Humanities (NEH) adopts the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Guidance in 2 CFR part 200. Thus, this part gives regulatory effect to the OMB guidance and supplements the guidance as needed for NEH.
MEDIATION REFERRALS

The following case has been returned to the regular docket pursuant to S.CtPrac.R. XIV(6)(E):

2007-1954.

#### State ex rel. McNeal v. Dayton.

Franklin App. No. 06AP-1093, 2007-0hio-5082.
#### § 60.151 Applicability.

The quality assurance program applies to all systems, structures and components important to safety, to design and characterization of barriers important to waste isolation and to activities related thereto. These activities include: site characterization, facility and equipment construction, facility operation, performance confirmation, permanent closure, and decontamination and dismantling of surface facilities.
#### § 910.352 Cost Principles.

For For-Profit Entities, the Cost Principles contained in 48 CFR 31.2 (Contracts with Commercial Organizations) must be followed in lieu of the Cost principles contained in 2 CFR 200.400 through 200.476, except that patent prosecution costs are not allowable unless specifically authorized in the award document. This applies to For-Profit entities whether they are recipients or subrecipients.

[79 FR 76024, Dec. 19, 2014, as amended at 87 FR 15320, Mar. 18, 2022]