U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE

WASHINGTON : 

For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office

Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800

Fax: (202) 512–2250 Mail: Stop SSOP, Washington, DC 20402–0001

93–841 PDF 2004

SUCCESSFUL HOMEOWNERSHIP AND

RENTING THROUGH HOUSING COUNSELING

HEARING

BEFORE THE

SUBCOMMITTEE ON 

HOUSING AND COMMUNITY OPPORTUNITY

OF THE

COMMITTEE ON FINANCIAL SERVICES

U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

ONE HUNDRED EIGHTH CONGRESS

SECOND SESSION

MARCH 18, 2004

Printed for the use of the Committee on Financial Services

Serial No. 108–73

(

(II)

HOUSE COMMITTEE ON FINANCIAL SERVICES 

MICHAEL G. OXLEY, Ohio, Chairman

JAMES A. LEACH, Iowa 

DOUG BEREUTER, Nebraska 

RICHARD H. BAKER, Louisiana 

SPENCER BACHUS, Alabama 

MICHAEL N. CASTLE, Delaware 

PETER T. KING, New York 

EDWARD R. ROYCE, California 

FRANK D. LUCAS, Oklahoma 

ROBERT W. NEY, Ohio 

SUE W. KELLY, New York, Vice Chair 

RON PAUL, Texas 

PAUL E. GILLMOR, Ohio 

JIM RYUN, Kansas 

STEVEN C. LATOURETTE, Ohio 

DONALD A. MANZULLO, Illinois 

WALTER B. JONES, JR., North Carolina 

DOUG OSE, California 

JUDY BIGGERT, Illinois 

MARK GREEN, Wisconsin 

PATRICK J. TOOMEY, Pennsylvania 

CHRISTOPHER SHAYS, Connecticut 

JOHN B. SHADEGG, Arizona 

VITO FOSSELLA, New York 

GARY G. MILLER, California 

MELISSA A. HART, Pennsylvania 

SHELLEY MOORE CAPITO, West Virginia 

PATRICK J. TIBERI, Ohio 

MARK R. KENNEDY, Minnesota 

TOM FEENEY, Florida 

JEB HENSARLING, Texas 

SCOTT GARRETT, New Jersey 

TIM MURPHY, Pennsylvania 

GINNY BROWN-WAITE, Florida 

J. GRESHAM BARRETT, South Carolina 

KATHERINE HARRIS, Florida 

RICK RENZI, Arizona 

BARNEY FRANK, Massachusetts 

PAUL E. KANJORSKI, Pennsylvania 

MAXINE WATERS, California 

CAROLYN B. MALONEY, New York 

LUIS V. GUTIERREZ, Illinois 

NYDIA M. VELA ́ ZQUEZ, New York 

MELVIN L. WATT, North Carolina 

GARY L. ACKERMAN, New York 

DARLENE HOOLEY, Oregon 

JULIA CARSON, Indiana 

BRAD SHERMAN, California 

GREGORY W. MEEKS, New York 

BARBARA LEE, California 

JAY INSLEE, Washington 

DENNIS MOORE, Kansas 

MICHAEL E. CAPUANO, Massachusetts 

HAROLD E. FORD, JR., Tennessee 

RUBE ́ N HINOJOSA, Texas 

KEN LUCAS, Kentucky 

JOSEPH CROWLEY, New York 

WM. LACY CLAY, Missouri 

STEVE ISRAEL, New York 

MIKE ROSS, Arkansas 

CAROLYN MCCARTHY, New York 

JOE BACA, California 

JIM MATHESON, Utah 

STEPHEN F. LYNCH, Massachusetts 

ARTUR DAVIS, Alabama 

RAHM EMANUEL, Illinois 

BRAD MILLER, North Carolina 

DAVID SCOTT, Georgia 

CHRIS BELL, Texas 

BERNARD SANDERS, Vermont

Robert U. Foster, III, Staff Director 

(III)

SUBCOMMITTEE ON HOUSING AND COMMUNITY OPPORTUNITY

ROBERT W. NEY, Ohio, Chairman

MARK GREEN, Wisconsin, Vice Chairman 

DOUG BEREUTER, Nebraska 

RICHARD H. BAKER, Louisiana 

PETER T. KING, New York 

WALTER B. JONES, JR., North Carolina 

DOUG OSE, California 

PATRICK J. TOOMEY, Pennsylvania 

CHRISTOPHER SHAYS, Connecticut 

GARY G. MILLER, California 

MELISSA A. HART, Pennsylvania 

PATRICK J. TIBERI, Ohio 

KATHERINE HARRIS, Florida 

RICK RENZI, Arizona 

MAXINE WATERS, California 

NYDIA M. VELA ́ ZQUEZ, New York 

JULIA CARSON, Indiana 

BARBARA LEE, California 

MICHAEL E. CAPUANO, Massachusetts 

BERNARD SANDERS, Vermont 

MELVIN L. WATT, North Carolina 

WILLIAM LACY CLAY, Missouri 

STEPHEN F. LYNCH, Massachusetts 

BRAD MILLER, North Carolina 

DAVID SCOTT, Georgia 

ARTUR DAVIS, Alabama 

(V)

C O N T E N T S 

Page 

Hearing held on: 

March 18, 2004 ................................................................................................. 1

Appendix: 

March 18, 2004 ................................................................................................. 59

WITNESSES 

THURSDAY, MARCH 18, 2004

Bibby, Douglas M., President, National Multi Housing Council ......................... 48

Canfield, Anne C., Executive Director, Consumer Mortgage Coalition ............... 49

Couch, Robert M., President and CEO, New South Federal Savings Bank, 

on behalf of the Mortgage Bankers Association ................................................ 46

Diaz, Lautaro, Deputy Vice President for Community Development, National 

Council of La Raza ............................................................................................... 31

Grist, Lisa-Nicolle, Executive Director, Neighbors Helping Neighbors, Inc. ...... 32

Jordan, Rodney, Vice Chairman, Norfolk Redevelopment and Housing Authority, Norfolk, VA .................................................................................................... 34

Obloy, Gary F., Executive Director, Community Action Commission of Belmont County, Inc., Clairsville, OH ..................................................................... 36

Smith, William, President and CEO, Mutual Community Savings Bank, on 

behalf of America’s Community Bankers ........................................................... 51

Spriggs, William E., Executive Director, National Urban League Institute 

for Opportunity and Equality .............................................................................. 52

Wade, Kenneth D., Executive Director, Neighborhood Reinvestment Corporation ........................................................................................................................ 29

Walsh, Chapman, Housing Director, Green Forest Community Development 

Corporation, Decatur, GA .................................................................................... 38

Weicher, Hon. John C., Assistant Secretary for Housing-Federal Housing 

Commissioner, U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development ........... 11

Williamson, Odette, Staff Attorney, National Consumer Law Center ................ 54

APPENDIX 

Prepared statements: 

Oxley, Hon. Michael G. .................................................................................... 60

Bibby, Douglas M. ............................................................................................ 61

Canfield, Anne C. ............................................................................................. 69

Couch, Robert M. .............................................................................................. 77

Diaz, Lautaro .................................................................................................... 83

Grist, Lisa-Nicolle ............................................................................................. 92

Jordan, Rodney ................................................................................................. 101

Obloy, Gary F. ................................................................................................... 104

Smith, William .................................................................................................. 109

Spriggs, William E. .......................................................................................... 113

Wade, Kenneth D. ............................................................................................ 118

Walsh, Chapman .............................................................................................. 130

Weicher, Hon. John C. ..................................................................................... 151

Williamson, Odette ........................................................................................... 158

ADDITIONAL MATERIAL SUBMITTED FOR THE RECORD

Bibby, Douglas M: 

Written response to questions from Hon. Nydia M. Velazquez .................... 172

Page

VI

Canfield, Anne C.: 

Written response to questions from Hon. Nydia M. Velazquez .................... 173

Couch, Robert M: 

Written response to questions from Hon. Nydia M. Velazquez .................... 176

Williamson, Odette: 

Written response to questions from Hon. Nydia M. Velazquez .................... 182

AARP, prepared statement ..................................................................................... 185

American Financial Services Association, prepared statement ........................... 191

American Society of Home Inspectors, Inc. ........................................................... 194

Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now, prepared statement ...................................................................................................................... 198

Financial Services Roundtable, prepared statement ............................................ 200

Housing Partnership Network, prepared statement ............................................. 207

The National American Indian Housing Council, prepared statement ............... 212

(1)

SUCCESSFUL HOMEOWNERSHIP AND 

RENTING THROUGH HOUSING COUNSELING 

Thursday, March 18, 2004

U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, SUBCOMMITTEE ON HOUSING AND COMMUNITY

OPPORTUNITY, COMMITTEE ON FINANCIAL SERVICES, Washington, D.C. 

The subcommittee met, pursuant to call, at 10:04 a.m., in Room 

1310, Longworth House Office Building, Hon. Bob Ney [chairman 

of the subcommittee] presiding. 

Present: Representatives Ney, Miller of California, Renzi, Waters, Velazquez, Lee, Clay, Scott and Davis. 

Chairman NEY. [Presiding.] Everybody got quiet before I banged 

the gavel. What a great group of people. It is because you are in 

smaller quarters. We could not have the hearing in the regular 

hearing room so we are here in House Administration, so we are 

just in a little bit tighter quarters. 

Today, the subcommittee meets to discuss the importance of 

housing counseling, specifically on H.R. 3938, Expanding Housing 

Opportunities Through Education and Counseling. I would like to 

thank the gentlelady from New York, Ms. Velazquez and her staff 

for their hard work and diligence in helping draft this important 

piece of legislation. I want to thank the gentlelady. We also worked 

in conjunction with the gentleman from Georgia, Mr. Scott, and we 

produced a bill designed I think that enhances the counseling programs currently operating through HUD and to foster other private 

counseling activities which I really firmly believe are so important 

to so many people. 

Currently, HUD laws and various documents show a variety of 

counseling activities scattered throughout the agency. This year, 

the Bush administration’s budget proposal recommends increasing 

funding for the housing counseling assistance program to $45 million and funding it through a separate program dedicated to housing counseling. In previous years, counseling was funded as a setaside within the HOME program. In fiscal year 2005, it is estimated that this $45 million will support 550,000 families with 

home purchase and homeownership counseling and about 250,000 

families with rental counseling. During the previous 3 years, this 

administration more than doubled funding for the program. 

H.R. 3938 will consolidate all HUD counseling services and programs under a single office within HUD entitled the Office of Housing Counseling. The mission of this office will be to coordinate and 

oversee HUD’s many housing counseling programs, to improve the 

2

efficiency and effectiveness of the counseling services provided 

through the HUD programs. The director of this office will be responsible for the oversight and coordination of both homeownership 

and rental housing counseling programs. 

Today, homeownership and counseling programs take on a variety of forms. Counseling is provided with grants through separately 

administered programs, nonprofit organizations, government agencies and lenders. The programs offered are delivered through a 

wide variety of different means, including telephone, classroom, 

home study, and individual counseling. Information provided and 

the timing of the counseling also varies I think significantly, but 

can be generally divided into two separate categories, pre-and postpurchase. 

Pre-purchase counseling education prepares families for the responsibility of homeownership by providing information on the 

home buying and the financing process. Counseling also can include information on financial planning, money management and 

home maintenance and repairs. Post-purchase includes the abovementioned items, but often has a greater emphasis on issues pertaining to maintenance and repair and to individual budgeting 

techniques. 

Extending homeownership opportunities to American families 

continues to be a primary focus of this housing subcommittee. I 

want to thank the members I mentioned previously, and the two 

members that have joined us, Mr. Renzi of Arizona and Mr. Miller 

of California. They have been also great members on a wide variety 

of issues. Last year, our bipartisan approach to legislation in 2003, 

and I want to thank everybody, and our Ranking Member, Maxine 

Waters, on this subcommittee, and of course the full committee 

Chairman Oxley and Ranking Member Barney Frank. 

Last year, our bipartisan approach to legislation in 2003 led to 

the enactment into law of 11 pieces of legislation out of here, which 

I think was a tremendous effort. I also want to thank the staff from 

both sides of the aisle for that. 

In December of last year, the President signed into law the 

American Dream Down Payment Act, which will assist an estimated 40,000 low-income families each year to share in the dream 

of owning their first home. Critical to increasing homeownership is 

helping families learn more about the important elements in the 

purchase or retention of a home, which for people is the most major 

thing practically that could happen in their lives. 

With that, without objection, I have more for the record. I do not 

want to take up the time of other statements and also the witnesses. 

Does the gentlelady have remarks? 

Ms. VELAZQUEZ. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. 

Mr. Chairman, achieving the American dream of owning a home 

is unfortunately still out of reach for many hard-working families 

across the nation. Despite that more than 68 percent of Americans 

now own a home, minorities still lag behind. Only 50 percent of 

Hispanic and Afro-American families own a home, as compared to 

76 percent of Caucasian families. 

The number of foreclosures are increasing nationwide, and are 

skyrocketing in many local communities. In Queens, New York, 

3

which is part of my congressional district, over 200 families defaulted on their mortgages last year and the foreclosure rate is 

twice the national average. Housing counseling is not just an important initial step in the process of purchasing a home. It is critical to ensuring that new homeowners know what is on the table 

and what is at stake when they sign on the bottom line. 

In neighborhoods across the country, certified housing counselors 

are meeting with low-income families helping, them determine if 

they are ready to purchase a home. They walk potential homeowners through the buying process, clarifying loan terms, fees and 

costs, as well as their rights and responsibilities. Housing counseling empowers individuals to meet with mortgage lenders knowing what that they have the information they need to successfully 

purchase and maintain a home for their families. 

However, many families caught up in the excitement of purchasing their first home are often ill-informed or misinformed 

about the loan agreement they are signing. As a result, they end 

up with mortgage payments they cannot afford and, with alarming 

frequency, face default or foreclosure. While not a solution to curbing predatory lending, housing counseling is an important part of 

educating families about all aspects of purchasing, maintaining and 

refinancing a home. 

I want to thank Chairman Ney for working together to draft this 

bill, which we believe is the first step in strengthening housing 

counseling services at the federal level. The Expanding Housing 

Opportunities Through Education and Counseling Act will elevate 

the importance of housing counseling at HUD. With establishment 

of the Office of Housing Counseling, the bill consolidates and expands the existing patchwork of counseling-related services under 

one roof. The director of housing counseling will be charged with 

strengthening services and ensuring that the agency is providing 

comprehensive assistance to counseling organizations in all neighborhoods across the country. 

The federal investment in housing counseling is critical to local 

agencies seeking to deliver their services to more families in more 

neighborhoods across the country. The Expanding Housing Opportunities Through Education and Counseling Act authorizes federal 

grants to provide a central source of funding to local agencies and 

not-for-profit organizations. The bill also targets low-income families, the elderly, individuals who face language barriers and other 

consumers who are more vulnerable to the predatory practices of 

unscrupulous lenders. This will ensure that these individuals are 

better prepared for the home-buying process and know the benefits 

and risks of their loan options. 

Today, we will hear testimony from HUD, housing counseling 

agencies, and lenders. Their testimony will help highlight just how 

important a strong federal investment in housing counseling is for 

families in underserved neighborhoods. I look forward to hearing 

everyone’s testimony today and I am sure that it will provide momentum to move this legislation forward and enact it into law. 

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. 

Chairman NEY. I thank the gentlelady. 

The gentleman from Arizona? 

Mr. RENZI. No comments here. 

4

Chairman NEY. Thank you. 

The gentleman from Georgia, Mr. Scott? 

Mr. SCOTT. Thank you very much, Chairman Ney. I want to commend you for the sterling leadership that you have provided on this 

issue. Ms. Velazquez, it has certainly been a pleasure working with 

you, and certainly our ranking member, Ms. Waters, for the leadership that she has provided on this issue over many years, and to 

other members of this committee. 

I do not think that there is a more pressing issue today that we 

can deal with than how we can assist our citizens in first purchasing a home, maintaining that home, and then keeping that 

home. Our country is plagued from one end to the other with unscrupulous lending practices, with predatory lending, with threats 

coming from every direction. So much of this is targeted, it is targeted at the most vulnerable people; it is targeted at our senior 

citizens; it is targeted at our minority communities; it is targeted 

at those places where people believe that they do not have the information, that they are not armed with the essentials to be able 

to protect themselves, protect their homes, and make sure that 

their dreams are manifested. 

Throughout my career in the State of Georgia, I have been working on this very important and serious issue. Any of us sitting at 

this table and in this room that have been familiar with this issue 

knows that Georgia has been at the forefront unfortunately of so 

many abusive practices. In many respects, it represents a trend 

across the nation. One of the things that we have learned has been, 

one, that an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure; and that 

we must prepare for the storm before the hurricane is raging. 

That is why I am so proud to work with this bill because that 

is exactly what we are doing. We are putting counseling in place. 

We are putting in a very important feature that I think is somewhat the basis of this legislation, which is a toll-free 800 number. 

This toll-free 800 number will provide a help-line for many of our 

constituents to be able to have access to help. We know that this 

is a targeted activity, so why not try to target the information and 

target the help-line to those communities. To have a toll-free 800 

number where individuals can reach out and call for help, and then 

to have grants that we can put down to the local community levels, 

so that groups who have the credibility with many of these targeted groups will be able to get this information to them. 

The NAACP, with a sterling history of working in this area, has 

certainly utilized the grants to work to get the toll-free number. 

Many church groups, senior citizens groups, AARP, folks that have 

the credibility of these individuals, and grassroots organizations 

that can use these grants to get the toll-free number out. We can 

use it to advertise. We can use it to put this number on radio stations, in newspapers, and those entities where these individuals listen and receive their information. 

And then the bottom line, ministers, senior citizens who hold 

ministers in high regard, can say in their pulpits, before you sign 

on the dotted line, call this 1-800 number. I think this is going to 

go a long way to help with a very needed, needed problem. 

So Mr. Chairman, I appreciate this opportunity. I want to thank 

you for letting me work with you. I am especially pleased that we 

5

have put forward a bill with the help of many members on this 

committee, that we have authored, called the Prevention of Predatory Lending Through Education Act, and Mr. Chairman, you have 

seen fit to include a number of the features of our bill in this bill. 

I want to say on the record how much I appreciate that. 

Chairman NEY. Thank you. 

Mr. SCOTT. As a freshman Democrat coming on the committee, 

I appreciate certainly the opportunity of working with you, Mr. 

Frank, Ms. Waters and all of the leadership in a bipartisan way 

to move this issue forward. 

I close my remarks by just recalling the words of Alexander 

Hamilton, one of the great founders of this country. As we know, 

Alexander Hamilton founded the cornerstone of our commercial 

and enterprising activities. He said that a country that remains illiterate of its commerce and handling of its money will not remain 

free and enterprising for long. 

I think that this measure goes a long way to take charge of those 

words from Hamilton and build on them because, Mr. Chairman, 

there is nothing more important than getting the information to 

this needed targeted group, and providing the counseling and the 

funding to make sure we can put a serious dent into many of these 

financial abuses by protecting and giving our targeted constituencies the armor to defend themselves. There is no greater armor 

than education and counseling. 

Thank you. 

Chairman NEY. I thank the gentleman for his comments. 

The gentleman from California, Mr. Miller? 

Mr. MILLER OF CALIFORNIA. Thank you, Mr. Ney. 

I would like to applaud you for this legislation. I have been involved in the housing industry privately for over 30 years and I 

have watched the industry change dramatically and the impact on 

the private sector and how that has really had direct correlations 

to the cost of housing. Much of the reason for the scarcity of housing and the cost of housing is government and government regulations and processes. 

I remember 25 or 30 years ago in California, and California is 

unusual because about 56.9 percent of the population in 2000 own 

a home in California. That is more than 10 percent under the national average. But I remember 25 or 30 years as a young builder, 

I could apply for a tentative tract map and in 58 days they had to 

say yes or no; 59 days, if they did not act, the government, you 

were approved by law. Now, with CEQA and the EIR process and 

the application and the way the law is drafted, your application is 

not even deemed complete until every ‘i’ is dotted and ‘t’ is crossed 

in the perspective of government. What used to be a 2-month process to be able to move forward to provide housing can be a 2-, 3-

, 5-, 8-, 10-year process, as you know. 

That is extremely disturbing from any perspective, especially 

from California. We are going to discuss things that I think should 

be discussed. Predatory lending is huge, but I think we need to 

move very cautiously because there are individuals out there in society who have less than perfect credit. Borrowers generally understand that if you pose a somewhat higher risk, there should also 

be reasonable expectations that the fees are going to be somewhat 

6

higher. But there is a huge difference between predatory and subprime. I think we are moving in a direction to really make it very 

difficult for predatory lenders, and understand that if you are a 

predator, that there is going to be a consequence and a price to be 

paid. 

We need to move gingerly to not impact in any fashion the subprime market, because that sub-prime market is absolutely essential and important to homeownership for those who have less than 

perfect credit, and there are a lot of people in this country who 

have less than perfect credit for different given reasons and different problems. 

But a real concern I have, and I hope you will address this, is 

RESPA. I worked with Secretary Martinez 3 years ago and I think 

we were moving I think very well through the RESPA process, the 

concept of bundling, other ones were thrown out there and debated 

back and forth, and compromise occurred. I really believed at that 

point in time we were heading in a reasonable direction on RESPA 

that would benefit consumers and provide the information that 

they needed and an understanding of how to best be able to proceed with the acquisition of a home, and clarify all the processes 

and such. 

But I am really, really concerned, and I have always had a great 

relationship with HUD, as you know. We have never had disagreements. We have always been able to work problems out. But the 

new process that you are going through really disturbs me because 

we do not know what it is. All I know is I have a letter here that 

FTC has come out with and said that the new RESPA reform proposal that they reviewed, which we have not reviewed, could cost 

mistakenly buyers $400 million and $800 million per year. 

Now, I do not know what that breaks down to per applicant, but 

when we are talking about $400 million to $800 million a year impact on people trying to get a loan because the new RESPA proposal is perceived from their perspective to be vague and ambiguous and could lead people to make the wrong decision rather than 

the right decision, it really concerns me because I thought we were 

really off in a good direction. Right now, I do not know if we are 

off in a good direction or we are off in a bad direction. All we can 

glean is that from what we are getting it could be concerning. So 

I hope you would address that. 

Again, Chairman Ney, thank you very much for this hearing and 

I look forward to hearing the testimony. 

Chairman NEY. Thank you. I do not know what direction we are 

in RESPA, period. I know that issue will continue and we will go 

down the road at some point in time with that. 

The gentlelady from California, Ms. Lee? 

Ms. LEE. Thank you, Mr. Chairman, and I want to thank Ranking Member Waters for convening this hearing today on this very 

important issue. 

Last year when we were marking up the American Dream Down 

Payment bill, we discussed and offered amendments to provide not 

only foreclosure assistance, but also foreclosure counseling to participants in the program of the American Dream Down Payment 

bill. 

7

Mr. Chairman, one thing that I wanted to just note for the record 

is that we all recognize that the key to successful wealth-building 

is comprehensive counseling for both homeowners and renters and 

also increasing the stock of affordable housing. We were pleased to 

know that this bill was in the hopper and that this hearing was 

going to be held today, but Mr. Chairman I wanted to ask you a 

couple of things, and just mention them in my opening statement, 

with regard to specifically section six of the bill that requires the 

preliminary report and study as it relates to foreclosure and default of home loans, and report back within 24 months. 

Some States I believe have conducted these studies and I would 

like to work with you as this bill moves forward to possibly talk 

about the States that have already conducted studies with regard 

to default and foreclosures, how we can provide maybe a provision 

for real foreclosure assistance and counseling in those States so 

that in fact we do not have to wait for 24 months. People are losing 

their homes right and left, and I think it would really be very helpful. Yes, the national study, but also, Mr. Chairman, I think it 

would be an added element to this bill where we can add some real 

help in terms of foreclosure assistance to those States that already 

have the studies in place. 

I think this is an excellent first step. It will streamline housing 

counseling services in HUD and I think it is a starting point. I look 

forward to this hearing and I hope to work with you to try to add 

some language to this bill. 

Chairman NEY. I want to thank the gentlelady. I am assuming 

you would like to go towards foreclosure counseling and you want 

to get also some of the state statistics that are out there to find 

out how many people are losing their homes and what can be done 

about it. 

Ms. LEE. Mr. Chairman, yes, but also some States already have 

conducted those studies and we know what the issues are and what 

the problems are. For those States that already have studies relating to this, I would like to provide a provision that says we are 

going to provide some foreclosure assistance and counseling, rather 

than just the study. 

Chairman NEY. I am sure we will have further discussions on 

the issue as it progresses. 

Ms. LEE. Okay. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I would like to work 

with you on that, as we move this bill forward. 

Chairman NEY. Thank you. 

Ms. LEE. Okay, thank you. 

Chairman NEY. Our Ranking Member, the gentlelady from California. 

Ms. WATERS. Thank you so much, Mr. Chairman, for scheduling 

this hearing on the important subject of housing counseling and on 

H.R. 3938, the bill that you introduced last week with Congresswoman Velazquez and Congressman Scott to expand housing opportunities through education and counseling. 

You have assembled large, balanced, and diverse panels of witnesses for this hearing, and I appreciate the care and attention 

that went into assuring that a wide range of views will be presented here today. I also commend you, Mr. Chairman, for making 

good on the pledge that you made last year to Congresswoman 

8

Velazquez to work with her on homeownership counseling legislation. 

Pre-purchase housing counseling is extremely important to ensuring that consumers are well informed and protected when they 

evaluate whether, when and how to purchase a home. Post-purchase housing counseling and foreclosure prevention counseling are 

essential to protecting consumers in times of financial stress. Yet 

it is critical to emphasize that housing counseling must be supported by strong, effective laws and regulations against predatory 

lending. Housing transactions are complex, intimidating transactions for many consumers, and counseling will better prepare 

consumers to deal with the unethical. 

We also should emphasize that while homeownership is an important goal for many Americans, there are millions of Americans 

who choose to rent and will always be renters. We need a balanced 

approach that recognizes that housing counseling is broader than 

just homeownership counseling. H.R. 3938 has some very attractive 

components. It establishes an office of housing counseling within 

HUD to consolidate and strengthen housing counseling offered by 

the federal government. It directs that standards be developed for 

materials used by counseling agencies in providing rental housing 

counseling and homeownership counseling. 

Based on legislation that was introduced by Representative 

Scott, H.R. 1865, the bill includes a toll-free number and Web site 

for a listing of housing counseling information. It provides that 

only HUD-certified housing counseling programs may receive assistance. It also has provisions for multi-media outreach to vulnerable populations at greatest risk of predatory lending, such as seniors, people with language barriers, low-income households, and ensures that all counseling materials and outreach are language and 

culturally appropriate. 

I know that some concerns have been raised about what culturally appropriate materials would mean in this context. I hope 

that our witnesses will address this issue in their testimony. While 

H.R. 3938 has many valuable elements, it also appears to me that 

certain aspects of the bill may require some fine-tuning. Some have 

raised concerns about the work of the proposed advisory council. It 

is important to determine what role, if any, such body would play 

in granting housing counseling funds. I believe that it is important 

that housing counseling funds be awarded on a competitive basis, 

and that the advisory council have no role in awarding these funds. 

H.R. 3938 also mandates the use of housing counseling software, 

that is on page 13 beginning at line 15, and carrying over to page 

14. This legislation mandates the Secretary to certify mortgage 

software programs for consumer use and authorizes the development of such mortgage software systems using private sector software companies. During the pilot phase, these mortgage software 

programs can only be offered in conjunction with counseling by a 

housing counselor. Following the pilot phase, they do not need to 

be. 

The Secretary is encouraged to make them widely available in 

public places and throughout the Internet. Thus, while initially the 

bill would require face-to-face counseling, the door is left open for 

this software to replace this human contact. Research suggests that 

9

this type of virtual counseling is far less effective than human contact. 

The legislation also appears to open the door to groups other 

than nonprofits and government bodies doing counseling. On page 

17, line 10, the legislation authorizes HUD to make financial assistance to States, units of local government, nonprofit organizations and other entities. These other entities could include for-profit businesses, including affiliates of lenders. Given the huge potential for conflicts of interest, if we allow those with an interest in 

profiting from this industry to provide advice that should be given 

by impartial groups, we need to proceed with great caution in this 

area. 

Finally, it is worth noting that this bill provides no new money 

for housing counseling beyond what President Bush has already 

proposed. We should be discussing the scope of the unmet needs for 

housing counseling and how best to address those needs. 

I look forward to hearing from our witnesses and hearing them 

examine many of these issues in the course of this hearing. I want 

to thank you, Mr. Chairman, and if I have to leave early, it is because H.R. 1375, the Financial Services Regulatory Relief Act, is on 

the floor and I have offered an amendment as you know that would 

retain the 15-day waiting period after the department of justice has 

signed off on a bank merger or mergers between bank holding companies. That is important to our consumers and I will have to go 

up and present my amendment. So if I leave early, it is because 

of that. 

Thank you. 

Chairman NEY. We understand. Before you came in, I thanked 

you and also want to do it again for all your work, last year working with us, and producing I think some good bills, about 11 or so 

that got to the floor. We appreciate that. 

Ms. WATERS. Thank you. 

Chairman NEY. Before we move directly on to the witnesses, I 

did want to clarify to the gentlelady from California, Congresswoman Lee, because you and I had not discussed it previously, but 

are you talking about, I have no problems with the counseling and 

also the counseling on foreclosure and looking at what the States 

have done, but are you talking about grants directly in the bill for 

foreclosure? 

Ms. LEE. That is part of it, Mr. Chairman. When there is a real 

need, if an individual or family can stay in their house based on 

30 days of assistance while they go through foreclosure counseling 

and restructure their loan or whatever is necessary, then I think 

we should be able to provide something to tide them over for those 

30 days or 60 days. 

Chairman NEY. I do not want to mislead you at all. The scope 

of this bill, and I will work with you on this and I will be glad to 

talk to you later about that other issue, but the scope of this bill 

is counseling. I do not know if we could place into here something 

that directly funds, I am not saying it is not a good issue, but I 

do not know if it will fit in the counseling bill. I did not want to 

mislead you. 

Ms. LEE. No, Mr. Chairman. I understand that. I just would like 

to work with you on it. I know under section six we do talk about 

10

the preliminary report that should be submitted to Congress on the 

root causes of default and foreclosure of home loans. So because 

this provision with regard to foreclosure is in there, I would like 

to see if there is any way we can figure that out under that section. 

Chairman NEY. Again, I do not think probably in this bill we will 

be able to go beyond counseling. I do not think we will be able to 

get into the direct grants, although it is an issue I would like to 

talk to you about. I think it is something important. 

Ms. LEE. Yes. Last year, we discussed this during the markup of 

the American Dream Homeownership bill, and I think that is a 

very important issue concept that this committee needs to address, 

because we could save a lot of homes and a lot of families from 

being thrown out as a result of a 30-day or a bridge kind of assistance. 

Chairman NEY. On the history of this issue, I am trying to recall, 

has there been a bill or do you have a bill or does anybody have 

a bill? 

Ms. LEE. We had amendments to the American Dream Down 

Payment bill that would have provided the framework for this kind 

of assistance. I would like to talk to you about those amendments 

and maybe turn that into some form of a bill. We talked about this 

during committee and said we would do that. 

Chairman NEY. We will talk later then. 

Ms. LEE. Because the point I believe you made at the hearing 

was that you did not want to tinker with the American Dream 

Down Payment bill, but most members understood the validity and 

the necessity to ensure that families stay in their homes. Sometimes it may be necessary just to help them through that 30-day 

or 60-day period. 

Chairman NEY. That is what actually led us here today, because 

I did not want on the counseling, I made a commitment on the 

counseling that I did not want to in fact take the counseling issue 

into that particular area. That is why I just wanted to clarify. I do 

not know if this bill would be the appropriate vehicle, because it 

is counseling, of direct grant assistance for foreclosures, but maybe 

we ought to look at a piece of legislation, or further discuss the 

issue. I just did not want to mislead you that when I realized you 

were talking about direct grants, I do not know if this would be the 

vehicle for it. 

Ms. LEE. Okay. No, Mr. Chairman. I understand that. I would 

just like to look at an appropriate vehicle so we can bring that to 

the committee because I think the time is now to do that. 

Chairman NEY. Thank you. I appreciate it. Thank you. 

We will move on to Mr. Weicher. Thank you for being here. He 

is Assistant Secretary for Housing and Federal Housing Commissioner at the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development, HUD, a post he has held since June of 2001. Prior to 

his appointment to HUD, Mr. Weicher was the Director of Urban 

Policy studies at the Hudson Institute and a member of the Millennial Housing Commission. 

Welcome, thank you. 

11

STATEMENT OF HON. JOHN C. WEICHER, ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR HOUSING-FEDERAL HOUSING COMMISSIONER, 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT 

Mr. WEICHER. Thank you, Mr. Chairman and members of the 

subcommittee. It is a pleasure to testify this morning regarding 

HUD’s housing counseling programs. 

Housing counseling plays a key role in support of the administration’s goal to increase homeownership and close the ownership gap 

between minority and non-minority households. The President’s 

blueprint for the American Dream Partnership establishes a goal 

of 5.5 million additional minority homeowners by the end of the 

decade, and specifically recommends educating more people regarding the home buying process to help achieve this goal. 

Counseling funds have doubled in this administration and we 

have requested a further increase to $45 million for fiscal year 

2005. We have gone from $20 million to $40 million already and 

we think this is part of the President’s continued commitment to 

expanding homeownership opportunities in this country. 

About half of HUD’s housing counseling funds support pre-purchase counseling and homebuyer education. Based on our experience in recent years, we project that the fiscal year 2003 funds will 

help about 60,000 families become homeowners this year. An additional 140,000 families will continue to work with their counselors 

so that they will become ready to buy a home during the following 

year. 

The counseling program also helps to ensure that these new 

homebuyers remain in their homes. About 20 percent of the housing counseling grant funds support the delivery of post-purchase 

counseling to help families pay their bills on time, perform basic 

home maintenance and make their mortgage payments. The fiscal 

year 2003 funds will help about 135,000 families to stay in their 

homes. 

The housing counseling programs accounts for more than twothirds of HUD’s direct grants for counseling. There are only two 

other programs within HUD that directly fund counseling-related 

activities. The fair housing initiatives program will devote $3.8 million in fiscal year 2004 for education and outreach grants to nonprofits and the resident opportunities for self-sufficiency program 

will provide $13.2 million in grants for life skills training, including 

financial literacy. 

In addition, funds from a number of other programs may be used 

to pay for counseling services, including HOME, CDBG, HOPE VI, 

Self-Help Homeownership, the SHOP program, and special needs 

assistance grants for the homeless. The decision to allocate any of 

those funds for counseling, however, is up to the grantees. 

I would like to describe some aspects of the program. To participate, an organization must first be approved by HUD as a housing 

counseling agency. Approval involves meeting various requirements 

relating to experience and capacity, including nonprofit status, a 

minimum of 1 year of housing counseling experience in the community, and sufficient resources to implement a housing counseling 

plan. We maintain a list of HUD-approved housing counseling 

agencies so that individuals and families in need of assistance can 

12

easily access the nearest HUD-approved housing counseling agency 

through HUD’s Web site or through our automated 1-800 hotline. 

Currently, there are almost 1,700 HUD-approved housing counseling agencies, including over 600 local housing counseling agencies, with another 600 branch offices, and almost 500 affiliates and 

branches of national and regional intermediaries. The national and 

regional intermediaries provide and manage sub-grants to networks of affiliated local housing counseling agencies and they also 

provide training and technical assistance. In addition, 16 state 

housing finance agencies provide counseling services with HUD 

housing counseling grant funds. 

Every 2 years, HUD performs an on-site review of every HUDapproved housing counseling agency to ensure that their performance is consistent with their housing counseling plan and that they 

are in compliance with program requirements. Reviewers may provide technical assistance based on their findings and results of the 

review are factored into grant application scores. 

For the past 3 years, HUD has given the AARP Foundation significant funding to develop training and quality control measures 

for congressionally mandated counseling related to home equity 

conversion mortgages. The money has supported development of a 

network of specially trained counselors who are employees of local 

HUD-approved nonprofit agencies. Based in part on this successful 

partnership, HUD will soon publish an $8 million housing counseling training notice of funding availability to train counselors, 

produce training and educational materials on a broad array of 

housing counseling topics. 

Also, we are in the process of procuring an Internet-based client 

management software system that is designed to improve the analysis of a client’s financial situation and readiness for home purchase, and also improve the collection of program-related activity 

data. 

Finally, a draft housing counseling regulation is making its way 

through HUD’s clearance process. This will be the first set of regulations for the housing counseling program. I hope that this overview of our counseling program clearly demonstrates the department’s commitment to the program and to the delivery of high 

quality counseling services across the nation. 

This concludes my statement, Mr. Chairman. Thank you again 

for the opportunity to meet with you today to discuss this important program. 

[The prepared statement of Hon. John C. Weicher can be found 

on page 11 in the appendix.] 

Chairman NEY. I want to thank the gentleman for his testimony 

and move to questions. 

Ms. Velazquez? 

Ms. VELAZQUEZ. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. 

Mr. Weicher, as you know, there has been discussion of creating 

a mortgage software system to be used to supplement housing 

counseling services. It has been suggested that HUD could use resources from the working capital fund for such an activity. Could 

you please clarify whether or not the funding for HUD’s working 

capital fund could be used for the creation of a mortgage software 

system? 

13

Mr. WEICHER. Ms. Velazquez, very simply, yes it can, and further, we are in the process of doing that. We are in the process of 

acquiring a client management system. I alluded to this a bit in my 

statement. We are very excited by this opportunity. We think this 

will enable us to track the performance of individual counseling 

agencies more precisely than we can now, and we think it will also 

enable us to track the outcomes of individual families who receive 

housing counseling far more precisely than we can now. 

We are very excited by this and we hope to complete that procurement as expeditiously as we can. As you know, the continuing 

resolutions that we have had in each of the last 2 years have complicated, for us in particular, IT procurement. Things have gone 

more slowly than we would like. 

Ms. VELAZQUEZ. Thank you. It is my understanding that current 

HUD guidelines prevent local nonprofits from combining community development block grant funding and housing counseling funding for housing counseling activities. HUD considers this doubledipping. While this requirement is to prevent organizations from 

getting paid twice for providing the same service, it severely limits 

funding sources for local housing counseling agencies. It is also my 

understanding that CDBG requires rigorous reporting standards to 

prevent the misuse of federal funds, and therefore the double-dipping guideline is unnecessary. It has been brought to my attention 

that this issue has been raised to HUD by housing counseling organizations. Can you please explain HUD’s thoughts on this issue 

and how the agency plans on addressing these concerns? 

Mr. WEICHER. Certainly, Ms. Velazquez. I think there may be 

some confusion about our position on this issue. We certainly encourage agencies to seek out and use as many sources of funding 

as possible. We do not provide all of the funding for any of the 

agencies which we fund. They have to use other sources besides 

ours. 

However, the issue becomes that funds from two different 

sources cannot be used to pay for the same service to the same client. And that is a government-wide policy. It is not simply a HUD 

policy. It is a policy of the federal government. You cannot pay 

twice for the same service to the same client. I know that from the 

standpoint of an individual counseling agency this may be a complication in terms of record keeping, but it is a government-wide 

requirement. It is not simply a HUD requirement. 

Ms. VELAZQUEZ. So if we want to change that, then we will have 

to do it through legislation. 

Mr. WEICHER. I believe you will, Ms. Velazquez. It is not something we at the department can change. 

Ms. VELAZQUEZ. Okay. Thank you. 

As you are aware, it has been proposed that housing counseling 

services should be consolidated under one roof. The intent would be 

to create a more efficient system that better meets the needs of 

counseling organizations and the families that benefit from those 

services. Can you please comment on what your views are of the 

benefits in consolidating housing counseling services at HUD? 

Mr. WEICHER. Let me start by saying that in each of the last 

three budgets, we have requested a separate account for housing 

counseling funding. As you know, the housing counseling program 

14

which I administer is in fact funded as a set-aside in the HOME 

block grant. The funds are transferred from that block grant to my 

office for purposes of awarding the funds and managing the program. 

We felt all along that housing counseling should have a more elevated position in policymaking. We do have some concerns with the 

proposal, and Assistant Secretary Roy Bernardi for Community 

Planning and Development, and I have both testified on this subject previously. We both have expressed concerns that we think a 

shift in the program operations of this sort would disrupt the service delivery for some period of time. We think it would well be 

counterproductive. 

We have ourselves revised the standards and performance measures relating to the 1,700 HUD-approved counseling agencies that 

participate in our program. We do not think there is a reason for 

another office to assume these responsibilities and begin to operate 

them. We think it is easier and quicker for us to continue to manage our program, and we as I said are over two-thirds of the total 

direct grants for housing counseling in the department. There are 

small programs in Fair Housing and in Public and Indian housing 

for specific clients, for specific purposes. We think they work well 

enough separately. 

Ms. VELAZQUEZ. Mr. Weicher, I have a list here of all the housing 

counseling programs that I want to make part of the record. Do you 

think that this is more manageable and that it would allow for you 

to provide better assistance to those counseling services organizations in our districts? 

Mr. WEICHER. Yes, because there are only three counseling programs which directly fund counseling, and our program is 70 percent of it. All the other programs on that list, counseling is an optional use of funding at the discretion of the grantee. That is true 

for CDBG; that is true for HOME; that is true for the Indian housing block grant. It is all at the discretion of the grantee. In some 

cases in addition, there is a requirement in a program that someone receive counseling, but there is not a requirement that the 

counseling be provided with HUD funds. 

We have a requirement that any borrower receiving a home equity conversion mortgage should receive counseling before obtaining that mortgage, but we do not make direct grants for that purpose. We leave that to the lender and the buyer to obtain the counseling. It comes down to three programs, and our program is over 

two-thirds of the total. 

Ms. VELAZQUEZ. The foreclosure rate is getting worse, not better, 

in our communities. It seems something is not working. 

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. 

Chairman NEY. Your time has expired. 

Mr. Miller? 

Mr. MILLER OF CALIFORNIA. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. 

Whenever I look at legislation, I say how can anybody in the private sector be held liable in court by mistake and oversight on our 

part. Under the Section 8 updating and simplification of mortgage 

information booklet, you put out a book on RESPA currently, correct? 

15

Mr. WEICHER. We put out a special information booklet which is 

to be distributed to any——

Mr. MILLER OF CALIFORNIA. Is that given to everybody who 

wants to buy a house, they are given a copy of the booklet in the 

process? 

Mr. WEICHER. They are supposed to receive that, yes. We do not 

ourselves distribute that booklet, but it is supposed to be provided 

by the lender. 

Mr. MILLER OF CALIFORNIA. The concern I have, in my community probably 12 years ago when my son was in elementary school, 

they spoke 37 different dialects. Among those dialects there were 

basic differences in cultural backgrounds even. This section talks 

about preparing a booklet to help consumers applying for federally 

related mortgage loans to understand the nature and cost of real 

estate settlement services. It says they have to be accessible to 

homebuyers of different ethnic and cultural backgrounds. 

Now, we can talk about that here and we might think that is 

very simple. In California, in reality it could be very difficult and 

complex to do this. How is this information to be distributed once 

HUD prepares it? 

Mr. WEICHER. The information is distributed by the lender. It is 

to be provided by the lender, by the loan originator, by the broker 

at the time that the borrower obtains the mortgage. It is intended 

to be useful to the borrower. 

Mr. MILLER OF CALIFORNIA. To a borrower in RESPA, if they do 

not, what liability do they face for that? 

Mr. WEICHER. I cannot tell you what the specific liability is for 

failure to provide a booklet. I can certainly provide that for the 

record, but I cannot tell you what the penalty is on that particular 

matter. 

Mr. MILLER OF CALIFORNIA. Mr. Chairman, I would strongly suggest that we try to get an answer to that question and define in 

this bill clearly that we are not intending to propose a significant 

impact upon an unintentional mortgage broker or a lender who 

might not necessarily have the proper information to deal with different ethnic and cultural backgrounds. A lot of people I know specifically in the Muslim community, for example, and in that community even though the dialect is similar, the cultural backgrounds 

and beliefs are completely different. What is acceptable in one is 

not acceptable in another. I know certain Muslims, the women are 

not allowed to shake your hand, because I am heathen, basically. 

That is the rule. 

So this concerns me because I think we are making an effort to 

do something good, but can we accomplish this and create legal 

roadblocks for the private sector down the road. I would like to see, 

at least consider it, I do not know if we can do it here, but consider 

trying to come up with something to add to this what the intent 

is and not create a tort issue out there that in the future some attorney is just going to try to make a fortune off some little guy who 

went out there and tried to help a person get a loan and did not 

give him or her the proper information based on this legislation. 

Chairman NEY. One comment, I would like to take credit for this, 

but our counsel, Clinton Jones, actually slipped the idea here to 

me. If you are going in to deal with a broker or anybody that is 

16

dealing with this issue, I do not know if HUD does this now, they 

all have the computers. Can’t this be put on the Web in all languages, you know, Creole, Farsi, Spanish, you name it? It could be 

put on the Web and then you click it and it prints off and you print 

one of 50 languages. Is that done now? Do you have things on the 

Web? 

Mr. WEICHER. We have many things translated into Spanish, in 

particular, and many of them on the Web. I know that in the previous administration there was an attempt to translate some basic 

material into a number of languages, which proved out in a couple 

of cases to be badly translated. The department recognizes that if 

you are going to provide information in other languages, you have 

to be very careful about the quality of the translation. 

Mr. MILLER OF CALIFORNIA. Perhaps we need to also consider in 

there that if we had that available on the Web, that it is to be supplied to the buyer in what the buyer perceives to be the most appropriate form available. That way the mortgage broker is not responsible if the mortgage broker shows the buyer a list of different 

languages and information that would be applicable, the buyer has 

the opportunity to pick one that he or she deems most appropriate 

for their needs. That way, we remove the liability from the middleman. 

Chairman NEY. We will explore the issue because it depends on 

which area of the country you are in. Florida has Creole. 

Mr. MILLER OF CALIFORNIA. I agree. I would appreciate some 

consideration of that area. 

Thank you. 

Chairman NEY. On to Mr. Scott. 

Mr. SCOTT. Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman. 

Secretary Weicher, can you tell the committee how many home 

education programs currently exist in HUD and how currently they 

are coordinated? 

Mr. WEICHER. We have three housing counseling programs. Our 

housing counseling grants provided by the Office of Housing, which 

we provide grants to over 400 agencies a year, and they total about 

$38 million this year. There are only two other programs. There is 

a $3.8 million program for fair housing initiatives counseling operated by the Office of Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity. There 

is a $13.2 million program, resident opportunities for self-sufficiency operated by the Office of Public and Indian Housing for residents of public housing. Those other two programs are both small, 

targeted to specific clienteles for specific purposes. Our program is 

the only general housing counseling direct grant program in the department. 

There are a number of other programs where funds can be used 

for counseling, but they are to be used at the discretion of the 

grantee. In the cases of CDBG, they are to be used at the discretion 

of the city or county that receives the funds. That is also true in 

the case of HOME. Funds are available in the Indian housing block 

grant and can be used in the Indian housing block grant for that 

purpose. But funds do not have to be used for that purpose in any 

of those programs. It is at the discretion of the grantee. So the Office of Housing provides over 70 percent of the funds for housing 

counseling that the department provides in the form of direct 

17

grants, and we operate the only broad national housing counseling 

grant program in the department. 

Mr. SCOTT. So we are setting up in this legislation a new Office 

of Housing. How will that help you coordinate these programs? 

Mr. WEICHER. As I was saying, it is not clear either to me or to 

my colleague, Assistant Secretary Roy Bernardi, that a new office 

is necessary for the management of our counseling grant program. 

We have only the one broad program which I now manage, and we 

have the two smaller grant programs which are managed in separate offices because they have separate purposes. These programs 

all run effectively, and we think that the transitional costs of combining management of all three programs into one office is not really likely to yield substantial benefits and is likely to have costs 

during the period of transition. 

Mr. SCOTT. Okay. Let’s look at section three and section four 

here which I think are the heart of this legislation, the counseling 

procedures and the money. Let’s take one of these, and work with 

me here on how you see this working in this new department. Let’s 

look at the toll-free number and the Web site. Let’s see how we tie 

that to the granting at the local level and then secondly, is $45 million sufficient to do some of this. 

I happen to believe that one of the most critical needs in dealing 

with this whole issue for our constituency is beating the predatory 

lenders to the punch and giving our folks out there some help. So 

we have this 1-800 number. It is coming to you. How do you envision this new office handling this 1-800 number? 

Mr. WEICHER. We have a 1-800 number now, as well as a Web 

site, and the number is 1-800-569-4287. A caller who uses that 

number is prompted to enter a zip code, select the type of counseling service needed from a menu, and the system will provide the 

caller with the names and the phone numbers of three agencies 

that offer these services that the caller wants in the caller’s area. 

On the Web site, we provide a list of all of the HUD-approved 

housing counseling agencies, categorized by state, then categorized 

by city in alphabetical order, listed by name. The Web site has the 

name of the organization, the address, the phone number and the 

types of counseling services provided. 

Mr. SCOTT. Mr. Weicher, could I ask you one question. 

Mr. WEICHER. Certainly, Mr. Scott. 

Mr. SCOTT. If it is clear that the people who need the help the 

most are elderly, one of the very reasons why they are so vulnerable and why we have this problem is that they do not have the 

sophistication. Don’t you think it would be helpful if we had a 1-

800 number and that we targeted this 1-800 number using some 

of these grants to get that number targeted to these elderly folks 

who simply want to be able to dial the phone number and get a 

human being, get somebody on the phone that they could talk to. 

Don’t you think that would be helpful? I mean, if they call a 1-800 

number and they get a recording, they get a lot of confusion, and 

they get a Web site, we are dealing with people who we want to 

help the most, but people that if we get this 1-800 number to them, 

we want to get them to talk to a human being. What is it going 

to take for us to get that? 

18

Mr. WEICHER. I think that the 1-800 number that we have now 

tells you what counseling agencies are available in your neighborhood, in your community. I think that information can be provided 

either on an automated basis or by an individual answering the 

phone, but I think that over the phone that really is about all the 

information that can be provided by a single 1-800 number. An elderly person calling and asking for help on a home equity conversion mortgage or a problem with a predatory loan will obtain from 

the 800 number or from the Web site the names, addresses and 

phone numbers of organizations which can provide help to them on 

their specific concerns. We believe that works reasonably well. We 

do think that process works. 

We yield to no one in our opposition to predatory lending. I testified before Senator Craig in the Senate Committee on Aging about 

6 weeks ago on the activities that we have taken at FHA to combat 

predatory lending in our FHA insurance program, which is the only 

place that HUD has direct authority to combat predatory lending. 

We have been aggressively pursuing that with literally half a dozen 

rules which we have put out as final rules in this administration 

and we continue to work on that problem. 

Chairman NEY. If I could, the time has expired and I have no 

problem coming back, but I think Mr. Renzi has a commitment, so 

if we can get him into the questioning, and then we will come back. 

Mr. Renzi? 

Mr. RENZI. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. 

I represent a district where actually I actually represent more 

Native Americans than anyone else in Congress that has one single 

district that is not a whole state. While I am not in favor of growing government, I would applaud Mr. Scott’s comments. I do not 

care if you have to add 100 people in this new office, if it takes that 

to reach out to particularly Native Americans who are the lowest 

of all minorities in the country as far as homeownership goes. 

In the Indian housing block grant program you have the ability 

on an optional basis to spend money for counseling. Can you help 

me understand that optional basis, please? 

Mr. WEICHER. I am not an expert on the Indian housing block 

grant. It is managed by my colleague, Assistant Secretary Mike 

Liu, the Office of Public and Indian Housing. I do know that counseling is an eligible activity in that program as it is in our other 

block grant programs. It is an eligible activity at the discretion of 

the grantee. I do not know to what extent the recipients of that 

block grant choose, the tribes choose to devote funds to counseling. 

We may be able to provide you with that information for the 

record, but I do not know that myself. 

Mr. RENZI. One of the things that I commend Mrs. Velazquez for 

teaching me when I first came on this committee was, many times 

first generation Americans trying to go to college and have their 

sons and daughters enter into the university system, the first impediment they meet is the application process. Of course, that is 

the same that we are seeing here as it relates to housing. For the 

first time, generations and generations of Native Americans who 

live on sovereign land do not even have the concept of a modular 

home. So they are having to break through cultural barriers in 

19

order to embrace the benefits that homeownership have that we 

have all seen. 

In the area of funding and the formula as it relates to Indian 

housing block grants, and again this is not so much counseling, but 

I have you in the door and since we opened it up, you know we 

are going through a tough time here as far as what kind of funding 

and everything, that housing will take in the block grant program. 

Many times, those monies are spent, are allocated to individuals in 

the census who check that they are Native American in their blood. 

They might live in Chicago, but because they checked the box that 

they are Native American, those monies that are specifically intended towards tribes or sovereign lands are then diverted into 

even inner-city areas. 

While I do not want to be a person who impedes their ability to 

get monies, there has got to be a focus as to how much money is 

being diverted away from the tribes, and the monies that are really 

needed on the reservation. The conditions on the Navajo Nation’s 

18 million acres are absolutely deplorable. You do not have to go 

to Africa. You do not have to go to the third world countries to see 

poverty like we have on the reservation. 

So I would just, since I had you in front of me today, I wanted 

to take the time to ask you to look at that. In my final couple of 

seconds here, could you just go ahead and expand upon any kind 

of HUD programs or any kind of counseling programs that you see 

that are going to really help Native Americans? Thank you. 

Mr. WEICHER. Let me say, Mr. Renzi, that I am not an expert 

on Indian housing and I do not manage the Indian housing programs at all. I certainly do not manage the Indian housing block 

grant. I do know that my colleague, Assistant Secretary Liu, 

spends a great deal of time addressing the Indian housing issues, 

and indeed has been much involved personally in the development 

of the formula for allocating funds under the Indian housing block 

grant. I know he spent a lot of time on that earlier this calendar 

year. 

What I can certainly do is express your concerns to him and I 

will certainly do that. I cannot tell you how that block grant program works. I cannot tell you of my own knowledge. We can certainly provide information for you for the record from the department. I can do that. 

Chairman NEY. Thank you. 

The gentlelady from California, Ms. Lee? 

Ms. LEE. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. 

First, thank you, Mr. Secretary, for being here. Let me just ask 

you a couple of questions about the current housing program, given 

the fact that we have such a high rate of foreclosures and of course 

cases of predatory lending. How effective are these existing housing 

counseling programs? 

Mr. WEICHER. We think they are effective. We track performance 

of clients in various kinds of programs in a number of ways. I can 

provide you with very detailed information for the record, but I can 

say, for instance, that the agencies which we have funded have provided help to clients who are trying to avoid a mortgage delinquency or resolve a delinquency without going to foreclosure. The 

HUD funds that we have provided have been successfully used to 

20

avoid foreclosure in 90 percent of the cases, here I am using data 

based on fiscal year 2002, in 90 percent of the cases where there 

has been a conclusion to the person’s concern, foreclosure has been 

avoided. 

Here we are dealing with people who are at serious risk of foreclosure. To start, there are a lot of families for whom we do not 

know at the end of the year whether they have successfully avoided 

foreclosure. The jury is still out. We do not know the end of the 

situation. 

Ms. LEE. So you have not done any national studies? 

Mr. WEICHER. Yes, we have tabulations of outcomes in a number 

of aspects, and this I think is a good indication of the effective use 

of our funds. It is also I think a good indication of the effectiveness 

of the housing counseling agencies who receive our funds and use 

our funds and other funds as well, to provide help. I think the 

funds are used effectively for the important purposes of keeping 

people in their homes and helping people buy homes. 

Ms. LEE. So you have the raw data, but you do not have the compilation of this data into any studies that would show us how effective these programs are? 

Mr. WEICHER. I can provide you with the tabulations. There are 

a number of studies which have been done. Two economists at 

Freddie Mac did a study 3 years ago looking at Freddie Mac’s data 

and measuring the effectiveness of counseling. There is a study 

done by The Ohio State University where I used to teach, not done 

by me, but done by The Ohio State University which shows the 

same pattern. I do not think there is any question about the effectiveness of housing counseling. We track it in our own program, in 

the FHA programs as well, and we know that counseling is effective in preventing foreclosure. 

It is on the basis of that research that the administration made 

the decision to ask Congress for additional funding for counseling. 

We started with a $20 million appropriation at the beginning of 

this administration. We have gone to $40 million with Congress 

acting favorably on our request, and we are now asking to go to 

$45 million. 

Ms. LEE. Okay. Given the number of assistance programs that 

you have, what do you think the impact would be if all of these 

counseling assistance programs were under one umbrella or were 

consolidated, streamlined, and that office, for example, takes responsible for really executing and maintaining these programs? 

Mr. WEICHER. There is only one direct grant program that provides housing counseling and that is the program I administer. 

That provides over two-thirds of the funding that the department 

has for housing counseling. There are only two other direct grant 

programs in the department. They are both much smaller and they 

both have very specific purposes. One is the Fair Housing Initiative 

grants for fair housing counseling, and one is the Resident Opportunities Self-Sufficiency Program for residents of public and Indian 

housing. One is managed by the Office of Fair Housing, the other 

by Public and Indian Housing. They are both small and they both 

have very specific purposes. 

The list that I know CRS has provided is largely a list of programs in which funds may be used for counseling at the discretion 

21

of the grantee. Unless you change those programs, unless you 

change CDBG or the Native American housing block grants, the 

decision to spend money on counseling rests with the grantee. 

Ms. LEE. I see. May I just quickly have an additional 30 seconds, 

Mr. Chairman? 

I just wanted to ask you about creating more affordable housing 

in terms of the housing production initiative, given the mission of 

HUD in terms of its goal to provide more affordable housing for everyone. How do you see the establishment of a national housing 

trust fund? We have had the bill here in committee. We have 

talked about it. We have support throughout the country, but 

somehow it just goes away. I am just wondering what your 

thoughts are on that. 

Mr. WEICHER. I have seen a number of proposals to use the reserves, the net worth of the FHA mutual mortgage insurance fund 

for a national housing trust, and those funds are the reserves that 

we use to pay claims when we have foreclosures. We certainly do 

not believe that the funds that FHA has collected from moderate 

income home buyers as part of a mutual mortgage insurance fund 

should be used for other purposes. 

Ms. LEE. About how much is in the reserves now? Do you know? 

Mr. WEICHER. The reserves are about $22 billion. 

Ms. LEE. $22 billion? 

Mr. WEICHER. At this point, yes. 

Ms. LEE. So just taking maybe $2 billion a year to create more 

affordable housing would impact this fund? 

Mr. WEICHER. Yes. Those reserves are to pay the costs of defaults, the cost of foreclosures. We have built them up through effective management of the program and we do our very best to 

minimize foreclosures and minimize losses on the foreclosures, but 

these are the reserves. 

Ms. LEE. No, I understand that, but I am just saying on the reserves, if we took $3 billion, $5 billion, left the reserve fund at $15 

billion, that would create a major impact in the ability to use the 

reserves in the way——

Mr. WEICHER. It would put the fund at some risk that we do not 

believe that there is any purpose in putting the fund at that risk. 

Ms. VELAZQUEZ. Would the gentlelady yield for a second? 

Ms. LEE. May I yield, Mr. Chairman? 

Chairman NEY. Ms. Lee, the time has expired. 

Ms. VELAZQUEZ. Just a quick question. Sir, out of the $20 billion 

reserve, what is the default rate? 

Mr. WEICHER. The default rate is not measured against the reserve. For a given book of business, we expect to have about 8 percent of the loans, the book of business being the loans underwritten 

in one year, we expect to have about an 8 percent claim rate over 

the life of that book of business, and we expect most of those claims 

to occur between about the third year and the fifth year after the 

loan is originated. After that, people have equity in the home and 

they are well established and they know how to do it. 

So we believe that the funds that we have are appropriately 

maintained for the MMI fund and we do not really see the public 

policy advantage of taxing moderate income first-time home buyers 

22

for the provision of housing for other people through charging premiums on the MMI fund. 

Chairman NEY. The time has expired. 

I want to note, the default rate is 12 percent? 

Mr. WEICHER. I am referring to the FHA. Over the life of a book 

of business, the loans we underwrite in any year, over the life of 

that book of business those loans will default, about 8 percent of 

those loans will default, and most of them will default in the first 

5 years. 

Chairman NEY. There was an article in the New York Times and 

the Journal of 12 percent. So you are all saying 8 percent. 

Mr. WEICHER. The New York Times was talking, what is commonly looked at is the default rate right now, and the default rate 

is higher during economic downturns, and the default rate tends to 

peak after the economy has turned up because people do their best 

to hang onto their homes when they become unemployed, so they 

avoid losing their home as long as possible. Typically, that means 

that some of the people who do not run out of resources after the 

economy as a whole has turned up, but their own position remains 

negative. We have seen this in every economic cycle back for 30 

years. 

Chairman NEY. I think it is 12 percent, but I will move on to Mr. 

Clay. 

[Laughter.] 

Mr. WEICHER. But not in our program. 

Mr. CLAY. Thank you, Mr. Chairman, for allowing me to claim 

my time. I appreciate that. 

Chairman NEY. We appreciate your patience. 

Mr. CLAY. Let me follow the same line of questioning of Ms. 

Velazquez and Ms. Lee. You know, Mr. Secretary, when people sign 

paperwork on predatory loans, they often do not understand what 

they are signing. Does your counseling program provide legal assistance to homeowners that enter into predatory loans? I would 

think that should be a point of any comprehensive counseling that 

your department provides. 

Mr. WEICHER. Yes, we do. The counseling agency may provide 

legal assistance directly or may refer the borrower to legal aid or 

to an organization which specializes in legal assistance, but that is 

one thing that happens for those borrowers who appear to be victims of predatory lending. Yes, that happens. 

Mr. CLAY. Okay, so if we change that setup and you go to a software program instead of a one-on-one session with a trained housing counselor who can really review the paperwork and figure out 

if there are alternatives available to those people seeking counseling, how does that help this situation? 

Mr. WEICHER. That is not what we are doing. The software program that Ms. Velazquez asked about is a software program which 

enables us to track the performance of housing counseling agencies 

and the experience of their clients much more specifically, much 

more directly than we are able to do now. It relates to Ms. Lee’s 

question about what kind of data we have and what the data 

shows. We are not proposing to replace any one-on-one counseling 

with a software program. The software program is an information 

23

tool for us and for the agencies that receive our funds. It is not a 

software counseling program. 

Mr. CLAY. Does that mean that when someone calls, will they 

speak to a person or speak to a machine? That can be frustrating, 

I know. 

Mr. WEICHER. Our 1-800 number is intended to direct you to a 

counseling agency. The counseling agency that provides you with 

help is providing you help through one-on-one counseling or perhaps through group counseling, but the counseling is being provided by human beings. 

Mr. CLAY. Okay. Along the same lines that others have asked 

you today, help me and describe the effectiveness of the post-homeownership counseling. Has your department been able to stave off 

foreclosures and keep families in homes? Along with that, should 

local communities that receive the grants and CDBG funds be required to provide counseling? You stated earlier that it was discretionary. Being from St. Louis, Missouri, I realize how local communities can abuse the CDBG funds. It happens every day in my community, where they go for unintended purposes. So should that be 

part of any law, that we require these local communities who receive these grants to provide the counseling necessary? 

Mr. WEICHER. I think there are two questions there. Let me take 

them in the order in which you asked them. 

We know that of those counseling clients who come to our counseling agencies and are trying to avoid losing their home, we know 

that 90 percent of them are successful in keeping their home. I 

think that is a good performance. With respect to requiring counseling in the CDBG, the rationale behind the CDBG program for 

the 30 years since it was enacted has been that the decision on how 

to use the funds should be left to the local government, the county, 

the city, the rural community that receives funds through the state 

CDBG portion. It becomes up to them to decide which purpose of 

the purposes of the funds are the most important to them. 

If you have abuses of funds, that becomes an issue for the HUD 

office of inspector general and perhaps the Justice Department, but 

it has not been our view and I do not think it has been a very popular view that CDBGs should be earmarked for specific purposes, 

rather than being left at the discretion of the local government to 

decide what is the most important local purpose. 

Mr. CLAY. You find local governments abusing funds every year. 

Mr. WEICHER. I am sure that is true. I think the abuses should 

be considered separately from the question of how the program is 

organized. There are abuses in categorical grant programs as well. 

It is in all of our interests to combat those abuses. 

Mr. CLAY. You have broad guidelines now in CDBG funding, so 

to make this a requirement you would see it to be problematic? 

Mr. WEICHER. I think I would like to defer to Assistant Secretary 

Bernardi who runs the program, but certainly our view has been 

that the program, and the view of I think all previous administrations has been that the program is intended to provide funding for 

local governments to make local decisions as to what they need. It 

came after a very unhappy experience with a number of categorical 

programs, most notably urban renewal. 

24

Mr. CLAY. Okay. That is a subject for another hearing, but I 

thank you for your answers. 

Chairman NEY. Would you like some extra time, Mr. Clay? 

[Laughter.] 

I feel bad. That is why I am offering it. We will have some other 

rounds here. I have one quick one and I will yield to any question 

you have. 

The one I wanted to ask about is, you were talking about the 

success of the pre-purchase housing counseling. Do you collect data 

on that, the number of people who were counseled and it was a successful situation for them? 

Mr. WEICHER. Yes, we do, Mr. Chairman. We can certainly provide that information to you for the record. As I said, I think to 

Ms. Lee, we have a very detailed tabulation. Of the families who 

received pre-purchase counseling last year, we count 150,000 families, of whom 30,000 bought a home; 70,000 are continuing the 

process of counseling with the clear expectation that they will be 

buying a home this year; and 10,000 decided not to buy a home, 

which is fine, too. It is one way of avoiding making a mistake. As 

a result of the counseling, they decided that they really were not 

ready to buy a home or this was not what they wanted to do. 

So a large number of families who received homeownership counseling either buy a home or are about to buy a home. The data 

stops at the end of that fiscal year. We think it is a successful program. 

Chairman NEY. What I will do, because we have two more panels, and Mr. Davis has yet to ask a question, I will just put some 

things in writing to you. I want to look at ways how we measure 

the effectiveness of the programs we have and the counseling. 

Mr. WEICHER. I would be glad to respond. 

Chairman NEY. Thank you. 

Mr. Davis? 

Mr. DAVIS. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I appreciate the Chair letting me sit here. I was not sure which would upset Ms. Waters 

more, seeing me on the Republican side or in her seat. 

[Laughter.] 

Chairman NEY. We could talk about sitting you over there if you 

would like to. 

[Laughter.] 

Mr. DAVIS. At least we would get a roll call tomorrow. 

Let me, Mr. Weicher, pick up the spirit of the last round of questions you have been asked about predatory lending. One of the 

things that is always very striking to me is that obviously we 

would expect to find a fairly active sub-prime market in low-income 

communities. I suppose that is the purpose of the sub-prime market. One of the things that is really striking to me, though, is that 

as I understand the statistics, the incidence of sub-prime lending 

is double in affluent black communities what it is in low-income 

white communities. That, I think, is a significant thing that we 

ought to very much try to get a handle on. I hope that your program is able to address some of those disparities. 

Let me ask you, what can your counseling program do to 

proactively seek out upper-income black homeowners who for whatever reasons are still being steered into the sub-prime market? Do 

25

you recognize that as a problem and what does your program do 

to specifically get at that concern? 

Mr. WEICHER. Mr. Davis, I believe that next week I will be testifying in front of this subcommittee on two program initiatives that 

we and FHA have in this year’s budget to create more opportunities, particularly for minority families, to buy homes with FHA-insured mortgages, and also for families which now own homes which 

have sub-prime loans, to refinance into FHA mortgages. We think 

both of those initiatives will go far toward addressing the concern 

that you raise. This is we think an important program initiative, 

and I very much hope you will be here next week, on either side 

of the aisle. 

Mr. DAVIS. I will be on this side of the aisle. 

Let me try to ask a slightly more pointed question than that. 

How do you structure a counseling program to not just reach people who are low income and who recognize that they have problems 

buying a home? That is an obvious target group for you to reach. 

I am sure there are fairly easy ways to reach them. How do you 

take it a step further, though, to proactively reach what may be affluent, but discriminated-against homeowners who may be African 

American or Latino, Puerto Rican? How do you go about telling 

them about the sub-prime market and the potential abuses in the 

sub-prime market? Is there anything in this counseling program 

that can really aggressively reach out to target not just your easy 

group of people to reach, the low income, but maybe some of your 

higher income individuals who still may be affected? 

Mr. WEICHER. I am not quite sure I would agree that it is easier 

to reach low-income people than it is high-income people, but setting that aside, there are two things here. Our program is intended 

to serve anyone who wants to buy a home. Our counseling agencies 

are prepared to help anyone who wants help. When we get into 

concerns about discrimination, that is where the program that I 

mentioned, one of the other two grant programs in the department, 

the Fair Housing Initiatives counseling program, comes into play 

as well. If there is a case of discrimination, that is something that 

they are prepared to help with. 

I can provide you for the record with the income levels of the individuals who we have helped last year. I cannot tell you what that 

looks like right now. 

Mr. DAVIS. Let me ask you one final set of questions on a different topic. There has been some concern that has been raised 

around what happens in the context of apartment owners. Can you 

clarify for me exactly how this program is going to be administered 

for people who are living in apartments? 

Mr. WEICHER. About 20 percent of the funds that we have for 

counseling are in fact used to provide rental counseling; provide 

counseling to individuals who either have problems where they are 

renting or are looking for help and advise in how to rent and what 

to look for. 

Mr. DAVIS. Who does the counseling? 

Mr. WEICHER. It is the same agencies. It is the same set of agencies. Some agencies will specialize more in homeownership counseling; some will specialize more in rental counseling; some will do 

both. But we make grants to agencies which are providing counVerDate 0ct 09 2002 11:48 Jul 21, 2004 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00031 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6633 G:\DOCS\93841.TXT FIN1 PsN: MICAH
26

seling assistance, housing counseling assistance, which may be 

homeownership counseling, buying a home, maybe keeping a home; 

maybe renting a home. We provide funding and our agencies provide assistance to people with any of those problems, and indeed 

there is homeless counseling in there as well. 

Mr. DAVIS. Okay. Mr. Chairman, I think my time has expired. 

Chairman NEY. Thank you. 

Ms. Velazquez and then Mr. Scott. 

Ms. VELAZQUEZ. Mr. Weicher, according to the U.S. Census Bureau statistical abstract the number of homes in foreclosure in the 

year 1980 was 114,000, while the number of homes in foreclosure 

in the year 2001 was 555,000. This is an increase of over 250 percent. Yet even this statistic masks the more dramatic increases in 

foreclosures in some neighborhoods; cities such as Philadelphia and 

Chicago, where the foreclosures have tripled in recent years, and 

in New York it is twice the national average. Are those numbers 

alarming to you? What do you have to say to those 555,000 people 

who lost their homes? 

Mr. WEICHER. I think with respect to the comparison over time, 

in 1980 we had experienced a long period of inflation which had resulted in substantial increases in house prices and made it for 

those people who owned homes much easier to avoid foreclosure. 

We have a significantly higher homeownership rate now than we 

had in 1980, and that means that we can expect there will be some 

more foreclosures for that reason as well. In 2001, we were in the 

recession that started at the end of 1980, and we will have higher 

foreclosure rates in a recession than we have in a period of good 

economic experience. 

That being said, we certainly are not happy when people lose 

their homes. We have a very active loss mitigation program in FHA 

where we require lenders to offer loss mitigation to families who 

are at risk of losing their homes. In the last 2 years, we have had 

as many families in loss mitigation as we have had foreclosures. Of 

those families who have loss mitigation, more than half of them 

have brought themselves current on their loan and avoided foreclosure within a year. That is an extremely important activity and 

it is something we are continuing. We monitor that. We monitor 

the performance of our lenders both in offering loss mitigation and 

in avoiding foreclosure. 

Ms. VELAZQUEZ. Given the high percentage of foreclosure, are 

you contemplating putting more funding into the prevention of 

foreclosure? 

Mr. WEICHER. This is something that is addressed in the notice 

of funds availability. We want a balance between promoting homeownership, preventing foreclosure, providing rental counseling, and 

to some extent that is at the discretion of the counseling agencies, 

which know what their clients, what their communities need. To 

some extent, it is based on guidance that we will provide as well. 

Certainly we believe in promoting homeownership, and we also 

know that it does not do anybody any good to put them in a home 

which they are going to lose in a couple of years through no fault 

of their own. 

Ms. VELAZQUEZ. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. 

Chairman NEY. Any other questions? 

27

Mr. SCOTT. Two very quick ones here. The first question, I do not 

want you to leave without answering this. What is your opinion of 

this legislation before us? 

Mr. WEICHER. As I believe I said earlier, we certainly applaud 

the purpose of the legislation. We have asked Congress, asked the 

Appropriations Committee to create a separate account for housing 

counseling and take it out of the home block grant. We do believe 

that the program that we have operates well. The program that I 

operate constitutes the large majority of the housing counseling 

grants that HUD makes. We do not really see a particular advantage to consolidating the three grant programs that we have into 

a single agency, since they serve different purposes and have different clienteles. I do know from my own experience that a reorganization within the department takes time and resources, and can 

be a complication while it is going on. I would be glad to try to explain it more thoroughly if you would like. 

Mr. SCOTT. Well, you are aware of a serious problem that requires our attention, that is going to require us to do more draconian measures to try to get at, to stop much of the abuses that are 

happening there. It is clear that there needs to be improvement in 

specific areas. Of course, the reason I asked you that question was, 

when I asked you the previous question about just one simple application of this new bill that we are pushing, which was the application of the toll-free number, clearly mandates that a toll-free 

number be established and that it be operated and that it be language-friendly, and that we have these other programs implemented so that it reaches these targeted groups of low-income senior citizens and so forth. 

In other words, this bill goes to the heart of the matter of getting 

at it. We must have a corresponding attitude within this administration than when help is coming, it needs to have a receptive nature, or else we will be forced to have to deal with more draconian 

measures of which mortgage bankers, mortgage banks, legitimate 

operators who are not in these activities, get caught up in this net. 

So it is my hope that as a result of this hearing, that HUD will 

go back and understand that this bill is vitally needed; that we 

need to get programs and outreach out there that target this; and 

currently what is being done is not getting the job done. 

Mr. WEICHER. Mr. Scott, we are the administration which has requested a doubling of housing counseling funds in the first 3 years 

and a further increase this year. We know housing counseling is 

important. We have made a point of requesting Congress and Congress has granted additional funds to support housing counseling. 

We have asked for a separate account in the budget for housing 

counseling which we believe would be valuable as well. 

Whatever abuses you are aware of or problems you are aware of 

in the performance of specific agencies, please let us know. We believe that the agencies are doing a good job. We believe that the 

funds that are being spent are helping people who need help now. 

They are helping them to buy homes. They are helping them to 

avoid foreclosure. They are helping to find and maintain and continue to live in decent rental housing. We think the program works 

well. It can always be improved, but we believe the program works 

28

well. I really would like specific examples of the problems that you 

allude to and I will address them if it is at all within my authority. 

Mr. SCOTT. Well, they are all over the place. They are in the 

news daily. We hope that as a result of this hearing that we have 

taken this opportunity to share with you the need for this, and this 

is the whole genesis of this counseling bill that we are putting forward. We look forward to working with you on it and receiving it, 

and making this an integral part of not taking what you are doing, 

but adding to it and making it a collaborative effort. But clearly 

and surely, we must get programs directly to these targeted 

groups, or else failing this, will come more draconian measures 

that many of the industries will not like. 

So it is my hope that you will be, and HUD will be very receptive 

to this bill and work with us to get it through, and that you will 

implement it and follow through with the directives in the legislation. 

Chairman NEY. Additional questions? 

I want to thank you, Mr. Weicher for your time today. 

Mr. WEICHER. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. 

Chairman NEY. We will move on to panel two if we could. Could 

I remind you as you speak to please turn the mikes on. We will 

start with panel two, Mr. Kenneth Wade, executive director, Neighborhood Reinvestment Corporation. We want to welcome you here 

today. You are the new executive director of the Neighborhood Reinvestment Corporation. The corporation is a national nonprofit organization created by Congress 25 years ago to develop effective 

systems of public and private sector support for community revitalization efforts. The corporation supports a network of more than 

220 locally based affordable housing and community development 

organizations. 

The next witness will be introduced by Congresswoman Velazquez. 

Ms. VELAZQUEZ. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. 

I would like to take this opportunity to personally welcome and 

introduce Lisa-Nicolle Grist, the executive director of Neighbors 

Helping Neighbors, a community-based housing counseling agency 

in my district. Neighbors Helping Neighbors serves tenants, homebuyers and owners of small properties and small businesses. The 

agency, which was founded by community residents in 1990, helps 

tenants retain and improve their homes, succeed in purchasing affordable first homes, and repair their homes and resolve mortgage 

delinquencies. 

The critical housing counseling Neighbors Helping Neighbors 

provides, and their leadership, has a huge impact on the families 

they serve. I appreciate your coming here to share the experiences 

you and your staff have had working with families in Sunset Park 

and Park Slope, Brooklyn. 

Thank you and welcome. 

Chairman NEY. We also want to welcome Lautaro Diaz, the deputy vice president for community development of the National 

Council of La Raza, a national Hispanic advocacy and research organization. La Raza seeks to improve opportunities for Hispanic 

Americans by supporting and strengthening local Hispanic groups. 

We want to welcome you. 

29

The next witness is Mr. Rodney Jordan, vice chairman of the 

Norfolk Redevelopment and Housing Authority in Norfolk, Virginia. We want to welcome you also. 

The next witness is Gary Obloy. He is from the great State of 

Ohio and the greater county of Belmont and the even greater city 

of St. Clairsville, which happens to be my hometown. So I have 

known Gary Obloy for a long time. He is executive director of Community Action Commission of Belmont County in St. Clairsville, 

Ohio. I personally know about the contributions that he has made 

and the commission and the people that they have helped in our 

county and its low-income residents, and the more than 25 federal, 

State and locally funded programs that it manages. So it is a pleasure to have you here today, Gary. 

The last witness will be introduced by Mr. Scott. 

Mr. SCOTT. Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman. We are delighted to have Mr. Chapman Walsh from the Green Forest Community Development Corporation in the great State of Georgia in 

my district. Mr. Walsh was appointed director of the homeownership program, the Green Forest Community Development Corporation in 1999. Prior to that, he served as the coordinator from 1997 

to 1998. 

Just very briefly, Green Forest Community Development Corporation is a private nonprofit faith-based community economic development corporation created by the Green Forest Community 

Baptist Church of Georgia. 

Good to have you with us. Thank you. 

Chairman NEY. Thank you very much. We will begin with Mr. 

Wade. 

STATEMENT OF KENNETH WADE, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, 

NEIGHBORHOOD REINVESTMENT CORPORATION 

Mr. WADE. Good morning, Chairman Ney and Representatives 

Velazquez and Scott. I am pleased to be here today. As was commented earlier, I am the executive director of Neighborhood Reinvestment. I am here today to share our achievements in the housing counseling area. 

While I am new to the executive director role here at Neighborhood Reinvestment, I have been with the corporation for 13 years, 

serving in a variety of capacities. Prior to becoming executive director, I was our director of National Programs. In that role, I oversaw 

our homebuyer education counseling efforts. So I am particularly 

proud to be here to share with you the accomplishments that we 

have achieved. 

We are authorized by the House Committee on Financial Services. We thank you for your continued support. NeighborWorks is 

over 220 community development organizations nationwide providing housing counseling and promoting neighborhood revitalization in 2,500 urban, suburban and rural communities, such as an 

organization you will hear from a little later today, Neighbors 

Helping Neighbors. We also work very extensively with HUD as 

they serve on our board, and we are one of the intermediaries that 

HUD funds in the housing counseling arena, and we do work with 

a number of the other panelists that you will hear from today in 

a number of capacities. Over the last 10 years, the NeighborWorks 

30

Campaign for Homeownership has set national standards for prepurchase homeownership counseling. NeighborWorks has established a 5-day training and certification course for housing counselors. With the committee’s support, NeighborWorks has certified 

more than 3,000 counselors nationwide. And the NeighborWorks 

network has provided housing counseling to nearly 500,000 families. 

NeighborWorks does this by creating a system that effectively 

educates low-income customers about the home buying process. 

This system, known as Full Cycle Lending, includes pre-purchase 

counseling, flexible loan products, and post-purchase counseling. 

Essentially, here is how it works. All the potential homebuyers receive a minimum of 8 hours of group counseling with follow-up individual counseling. In addition, NeighborWorks housing counselors are certified by completing a 5-day home buyer education 

methods class at our national training institute, where they are 

also required to pass an exam. In addition, NeighborWorks uses 

the widely endorsed Realizing the American Dream curriculum, 

which I would like to submit for the record today. 

Because of these high standards, families across the country from 

Ohio to Queens, New York to all the communities you represent 

have received over 4 million hours of counseling in the last 10 

years. The demand for housing counseling continues to rise and we 

plan to significantly increase the number of housing counselors we 

train and certify. This will reach more underserved communities 

and ensure effective education and counseling to a vast number of 

additional families and individuals. 

NeighborWorks housing counseling achievements are even more 

impressive when you consider that the home buyers directly assisted by the NeighborWorks system are traditionally underserved 

populations: 51 percent of those home buyers were non-white; 67 

percent earned less than their area’s median income; and 44 percent were female-headed households. NeighborWorks adheres to 

strict housing counseling standards that have proven to lower delinquency and default rates. Mortgage delinquency among 

NeighborWorks customers is lower than for all mortgage loans in 

the United States. This is amazing when you consider that these 

borrowers are often viewed by the conventional market as too 

risky. 

Moreover, only 0.25 percent of NeighborWorks borrowers were 

foreclosed upon. This is less than the foreclosure rate for conventional borrowers. NeighborWorks borrowers are thoroughly educated about the responsibilities of owning a home and therefore 

have a stabilizing impact on their communities. This is why 

NeighborWorks insists on Full Cycle Lending. 

I thank the subcommittee for the opportunity to speak about the 

housing counseling successes of NeighborWorks. Your support and 

guidance have been crucial to our effectiveness. We look forward to 

greater success in the future and we look forward to working with 

you in any way we can. 

Thank you. I am prepared to answer any questions you might 

have. 

[The prepared statement of Kenneth D. Wade can be found on 

page 29 in the appendix.] 

31

Chairman NEY. Thank you. We will get to the testimony and 

then we will come to questioning. 

Mr. Diaz? 

STATEMENT OF LAUTARO DIAZ, DEPUTY VICE PRESIDENT 

FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT, NATIONAL COUNCIL OF 

LA RAZA 

Mr. DIAZ. Thank you, Chairman Ney, Ranking Member Waters 

and Congresswoman Velazquez and the rest of the members of the 

subcommittee. My name is Lautaro Diaz. I am NCLR’s deputy vice 

president for community development. I have spent the last 16 

years developing and operating community development programs, 

including small business lending, single-family and multi-family 

housing development and homeownership programs. 

As the nation’s largest national Hispanic constituency-based organization, NCLR serves all Hispanic national groups in all the regions of the country through a network of more than 300 affiliated 

community-based organizations. We have a long history in the 

housing industry. We have been producing research, policy analysis 

and advocacy on affordable housing issues for more than two decades. We partnered with Fannie Mae and First Interstate Bank in 

the early 1990s to pilot one of the first counseling programs called 

Home To Own. NCLR has since become a national intermediary 

designated by HUD to distribute funds to community-based organizations providing housing counseling services. 

NCLR has concluded that housing counseling is a powerful tool 

that effectively moves low-income families into homeownership. 

Homeownership is critical to building wealth in the Latino community. However, Latinos are still significantly less likely than other 

Americans to be homeowners. Hispanic families have unique financial service needs that are not being met by the marketplace. In 

fact, we estimate that more than one million Hispanic families are 

mortgage-ready, yet do not own their own homes. There are four 

key barriers to this, to increasing Latino homeownership: lack of 

information regarding the process; lack of affordability in many of 

the mortgage markets around the country; systemic barriers to obtaining a mortgage; and other market failures. 

This brings me to NCLR’s homeownership network, or NHN. The 

mission and purpose of NHN is to increase Latino homeownership 

in a manner that does not endanger the family financially. The 

NHN consists of 35 NCLR affiliates in 15 States that provide bilingual pre-purchase homeownership counseling to low-income families. NCLR counsels over 20,000 families per year and closes approximately 3,000 mortgages with those families. Today, more than 

13,500 families have achieved homeownership through NHN agencies. 

The success of the network is based in large part on the NCLR 

model which focuses on a single goal: increasing the number of 

Latino homeowners. NHN counselors may spend 6 months to 3 

years helping a family prepare for this goal. Once the family is 

ready to purchase their home, counselors help families evaluate 

products, navigate the closing process, and help the family package 

a loan and send it on to the lenders for verification and processing. 

32

As we all know, the home buying industry is expanding. In the 

midst of these changes, community-based housing counseling agencies are becoming more critical to the home buying process. They 

are often the first point of contact for Latino and immigrant families looking for trustworthy information. The counseling agencies 

play a critical role in filling the market gap that exists for low-income Hispanic families. 

It is imperative that all levels of government recognize the important role the organizations play. It is important that the mortgage industry reward families that receive counseling and recognize the value-added provided by counselors. It is equally important that the regulatory environment does not discourage this role. 

NCLR has forged many sophisticated national partnerships with 

financial institutions. These partnerships have allowed us to expand our capacity by, first, increasing funding to counseling agencies by leveraging NCLR’s HUD grant funds with private mortgage 

company contributions to NCLR’s network. We have been able to 

develop innovative database technology designed for counseling 

agencies to increase staff efficiency. They have helped create feefor-service relationships that will allow agencies to become more 

self-sufficient. 

Now let me turn to our recommendations. NCLR applauds H.R. 

3938 for promoting the visibility and work of housing counselors. 

However, NCLR would like to make the following recommendations 

to improve the bill and advance the counseling field. First, we suggest increased funding. The program has proven its capacity and 

effectiveness. In order to reproduce this success on a larger scale, 

increased support is necessary. Second, develop a pilot program 

with FHA clients. FHA and VA loans have the highest delinquency 

and foreclosure rates. Proven counseling methods can be used to 

mitigate the risk for both the homeowner and the taxpayer. Finally, support fee income. Agencies must develop ways to generate 

fee income to become self-sustainable. This committee should encourage HUD to affirm counseling agencies’ ability to earn fees. 

Thank you and I would be happy to answer any questions afterwards. 

[The prepared statement of Lautaro Diaz can be found on page 

31 in the appendix.] 

Chairman NEY. Thank you very much. 

Ms. Grist? 

STATEMENT OF LISA-NICOLLE GRIST, CHIEF EXECUTIVE 

DIRECTOR, NEIGHBORS HELPING NEIGHBORS, INC. 

Ms. GRIST. Thank you very much. I am Lisa-Nicolle Grist. I am 

the executive director of Neighbors Helping Neighbors in Brooklyn, 

New York. 

It is a great honor for me to be invited to join this panel of leaders whose work I have long admired, and to be asked to share a 

Brooklyn street-level perspective on both the importance and the 

mechanics of housing counseling. 

The home is the base from which families climb the socioeconomic ladder. It is a key to health, educational attainment, business opportunities and intergenerational wealth. Thus, housing 

counseling helps residents not only to stabilize their housing situaVerDate 0ct 09 2002 11:48 Jul 21, 2004 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00038 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6633 G:\DOCS\93841.TXT FIN1 PsN: MICAH
33

tions, but also to advance the quality of their lives. As housing 

counselors, we envision a society where all people are secure in 

their ability to find, afford and keep good homes. 

Housing is typically a person’s largest expense and investment. 

The price and quality of housing is affected by a complex set of institutions. Therefore, housing counseling helps educate consumers 

and level the playing field between individuals and institutions 

that naturally have very different amounts of information and 

power. For example, housing counseling creates confidence for firsttime home buyers facing mortgage banks, tenants facing housing 

court, and homeowners facing foreclosure attorneys. 

Neighbors Helping Neighbors, which is also called NHN or sometimes VAV, is a community-based organization that advocates and 

serves tenants, homebuyers and owners of small properties and 

small businesses. Our mission is to enable low-and moderate-income people to build assets for their families and Brooklyn communities by securing, improving and owning their homes and businesses. NHN’s most quantifiable results come from helping low-income people get money to buy, keep or improve their homes. 

In the course of our history, we have facilitated 148 home repair loans worth almost $2.5 million; 463 mortgages worth over $64 million; and in the past 2 years, NHN has saved over 50 families from 

becoming homeless by securing rent subsidies worth nearly 

$485,000. Since housing and money are inseparable, we also measure the difference that we make in people’s lives by giving them 

the information and tools to take charge of their personal finances. 

NHN is a HUD-certified local housing counseling agency. We have 

received housing counseling grants each year since 1999 and our 

experience in applying for and administering the HUD grants has 

generally been excellent, even though the processes can be somewhat complicated. 

The HUD housing counseling grant program offers ample flexibility for us to adjust to changing community needs. NHN’s housing counseling work is also funded by New York City and New 

York State, the Neighborhood Reinvestment Corporation, the New 

York Mortgage Coalition and its member banks. Our partnerships 

with banks are very important to NHN’s home buyer and homeowner counseling programs. These partnerships give us legitimacy 

in the eyes of the public and enable us to offer real products, not 

just words, to people who might otherwise succumb to the aggressive marketing by predatory lenders. 

NHN’s one-on-one home buyer counseling ensures that people 

have sufficient income, savings and credit to qualify for a mortgage, and that they shop for homes they can afford. Once a customer has identified an affordable property, NHN calls several 

banks, helps them complete the application, and helps them 

through closing. NHN also counsels homeowners on how to seek 

loan forbearance or pursue other loss mitigation strategies. 

Homeowners who miss FHA mortgage payments are advised by 

their lenders to contact HUD’s housing counseling clearinghouse, 

that 800 number, which refers them to local agencies through zip 

codes. Sometimes this is less than ideal because homeowners often 

delay in seeking help because the mortgage delinquency is just one 

of many disheartening factors that create more stress and chaos in 

34

their lives. Unfortunately, the delay means precious time is lost. 

Counseling is most effective in the first 3 months of a mortgage delinquency, but is very difficult after a lender starts legal proceedings. 

Some large counseling agencies have built relationships with 

loan servicers so that the agency gets notification of missed mortgage payments and can reach out to homeowners proactively. Although our organization does not participate in that system, I 

imagine that it is very successful. It requires substantial staff capacity. 

Our homeownership counselors must continuously become more 

efficient, knowledgeable and professionally skilled in order to meet 

our banking partners’ increasing expectations. To help us meet 

those expectations, NHN receives superb technical assistance from 

Neighborhood Reinvestment in the person of management consultant Jose Perez. 

In addition to homeownership counseling, the need for rental 

counseling is overwhelming. A person earning the minimum wage 

would have to work 154 hours a week to afford the average onebedroom apartment in New York City, or would have to earn a 

wage of almost $20 an hour to afford a typical two-bedroom apartment. At NHN, we focus on preventing homelessness by helping 

people to afford and improve their current rental situations. The 

median annual household income of NHN’s tenant customers is 

less than $7,000; 44 percent of the tenants who seek our help are 

having problems making rent payments. Due to the high cost of 

housing and the excess of demand over supply in rental housing in 

New York, displacement counseling is one of our most important 

types of work. 

I hope this helps address the committee’s interests and my written testimony offers more detailed descriptions of our work and the 

ways that we measure our success, as well as some case studies 

about people that we have helped. 

Thank you for giving me this opportunity to participate in the 

process. 

[The prepared statement of Lisa-Nicolle Grist can be found on 

page 32 in the appendix.] 

Chairman NEY. Thank you. 

Mr. Jordan? 

STATEMENT OF RODNEY JORDAN, VICE CHAIRMAN, NORFOLK 

REDEVELOPMENT AND HOUSING AUTHORITY, NORFOLK, VA 

Mr. JORDAN. Good afternoon, Chairman Ney and honorable committee members. I am Rodney Jordan, vice-chair of the board of 

commissioners of Norfolk Redevelopment and Housing Authority in 

Norfolk, Virginia. With me today are Lori Burden and LaShawn 

Fortes of the NHRA Homeownership Center, and in the audience 

is Robert Jenkins, our deputy executive director. 

As one of the oldest redevelopment housing authorities in the 

country, we at NRHA are well aware of the benefits of raising the 

rate of homeownership. Not only does it strengthen Norfolk’s neighborhoods and help maintain a healthy economy, it also contributes 

to wealth creation and has positive effects on our city’s social and 

educational cultures. That is why we created the NHRA HomeVerDate 0ct 09 2002 11:48 Jul 21, 2004 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00040 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6633 G:\DOCS\93841.TXT FIN1 PsN: MICAH
35

ownership Center. It is just one of the many innovations we have 

brought to our industry in recent years. 

Another example of how NHRA innovates is that we were the 

only housing agency in the nation to be awarded an allocation of 

new market tax credits by the U.S. treasury in the program’s first 

round. These tax credits are enabling us to bring amenities such 

as fitness centers and grocery stores into the neighborhoods we 

build, and those amenities in turn attract the homebuyers that we 

counsel to those neighborhoods. 

Today, through our one-stop homeownership center, we demonstrate our commitment to bringing the great American dream of 

homeownership to more people every year, especially minorities. 

We do this by providing comprehensive and customized homeownership counseling to any prospective Norfolk homebuyer. Our 

center is designed to reach families from all economic backgrounds 

to the variety of housing choices available in Norfolk, including the 

homes that we build. 

The counseling we offer provides potential homebuyers with the 

tools and resources they need to become homeowners. We have programs that cover everything involved in the process of purchasing 

a home, from restoring credit and finding the right mortgage, to 

builder selection, home inspections and foreclosure prevention. To 

bring a complete range of home buying services to our clients, we 

form partnerships with banks, developers, mortgage companies, attorneys, real estate firms and other government agencies. 

Another important benefit is that through our Homeownership 

Center, we are able to match buyers with homes in the neighborhoods that we build as a redevelopment authority. Another plus is 

that our center also creates demand for other NHRA services such 

as rehabilitating homes and selling real estate. Our housing counseling ultimately increases homeownership in Norfolk, especially 

among minorities, by educating potential home buyers about the 

issues involved in buying and owning a home. Our goal is to remove the barriers to homeownership by preparing clients to become 

mortgage ready, enable them to pre-qualify for loans, and informing them of the range of special financing and mortgage programs 

available. 

The post-homeownership counseling we offer enables clients to 

handle issues that may come up after loan closing. For some of our 

clients, this counseling is the first time they have learned anything 

about homeownership because they come from families caught in 

the cycle of poverty that has prevented previous generations from 

becoming homeowners. 

Our housing counselors are certified through the Neighborhood 

Reinvestment Corporation’s NeighborWorks Institute and by the 

Commonwealth of Virginia. We offer a 22-month counseling program through our five home buyer clubs, 6 hours of group counseling through the VHDA home buyers program, and individual 

counseling customized to each client’s needs. We now provide counseling to more than 350 families and individuals annually. Of 

those, more than 50 are considered mortgage-ready, and at least 

half of those end up buying new homes that we build in mixed-income neighborhoods. For example, as a result of our homeownership counseling in our new neighborhood of Westchurch, we have 

36

former public housing families living next door to homeowners who 

earn six-figure salaries. 

Although we are not a HUD-approved agency, our mission is 

comparable. As with those agencies, we give advice on buying a 

home, renting, defaults, foreclosures and credit histories. Our counseling programs are very similar to those offered by HUD-funded 

agencies and cover virtually all of the same issues. Preventing foreclosure is addressed through the home buying classes we offer in 

conjunction with VHDA. For more intensive foreclosure counseling, 

we refer clients to one of our homeownership center partners, 

Catholic Charities of Hampton Roads. 

We offer a 22-month counseling program through our five homebuyers clubs, as I mentioned before, and additional training as 

well. One important way that we measure our success is through 

the number of clients who graduate from our counseling programs. 

We also track our clients’ successes through their improved credit 

scores, increased savings and reduced debt, loan pre-qualification, 

and ultimate goal of achieving homeownership. 

The classes we offer with VHDA educate our clients about the 

issues of questionable and predatory lending, as well as foreclosure 

prevention. Even if the financial institutions we partner with did 

not require that these issues be addressed, we believe that it is our 

responsibility to educate and inform our clients about these unfair 

lending tactics. 

I would like to thank you for inviting me here today and I would 

be free to answer questions at the appropriate time. 

[The prepared statement of Rodney Jordan can be found on page 

34 in the appendix.] 

Chairman NEY. Thank you, Mr. Jordan. 

Mr. Obloy? 

STATEMENT OF GARY OBLOY, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, COMMUNITY ACTION COMMISSION OF BELMONT COUNTY, INC., 

CLAIRSVILLE, OH 

Mr. OBLOY. Good afternoon. My name is Gary Obloy and I am 

the executive director of the Community Action Commission of Belmont County. We are located in Appalachian Ohio. I wish to thank 

Chairman Ney and members of the subcommittee for giving me the 

opportunity to address you today. 

I would like to begin by describing for you the mission of the 

Community Action Commission and by explaining what we do in 

an attempt to improve the lives of the people we serve. The Community Action Commission of Belmont County is a private nonprofit organization governed by an 18-member board. The agency’s 

mission is to combat poverty, its causes and consequences. The 

Community Action Commission administers over 20 federal, state 

and privately funded programs targeted to low-and moderate-income residents of Belmont County. Specific programs include the 

LIHEAP Program, the Home Weatherization Assistance Program 

and the Homebuyers Counseling Program. 

In January 1997, the Community Action Commission received a 

certification from the Department of Housing and Urban Development in first-time homebuyer education and for home equity conversion mortgages. In May 2000, the Community Action CommisVerDate 0ct 09 2002 11:48 Jul 21, 2004 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00042 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6633 G:\DOCS\93841.TXT FIN1 PsN: MICAH
37

sion received certification from HUD as a local comprehensive 

housing counseling agency. The Community Action Commission’s 

program provides services in four areas: homebuyer education; 

budget counseling; foreclosure prevention; and home equity conversion mortgages. Resource materials used include the HUD publication, the Home Buyer Education and Learning Program Guide, also 

known as HELP, various handouts which have been compiled into 

booklet form, and a locally designed PowerPoint presentation. 

Homebuyer education includes general sessions on budgeting, home 

selection, financing, the closing process, knowing and understanding credit, post-closing, and foreclosure prevention. 

General sessions are offered eight times per year with an average class size of 10. In 2003, 25 customers who attended homeownership sessions purchased their first home. From 1996 to 2003, 

persons attending the sessions have purchased 215 homes. While 

the purchase of a home is a significant measure of success, it is not 

the sole indicator of the benefits of a homeownership counseling 

program. Currently, 27 families are in pre-purchase status, meaning they lack a sufficient down payment or have not been able to 

identify a home which is financially affordable. This status ranges 

up to 18 months. Thirty-one families have been working on credit 

issues for the last 6 to 12 months. Eleven families have contacted 

the Community Action Commission after becoming delinquent. Seventeen families who purchased a home have contacted the agency 

requesting additional information on such topics as home repair 

and insurance. 

For the grant year ending September 30, 2002, 96 households 

completed the home buyer education workshops; 28 purchased 

housing; 9 decided not to purchase; 2 obtained a home equity conversion mortgage; 3 initiated forbearance agreements or repayment 

plans; and 1 mortgage was foreclosed upon. 

Participants are also schooled in renting versus ownership. A 

participant’s involvement includes an analysis of the household income and expenses, a credit report and discussions on the impact 

of an immediate purchase as opposed to remaining a renter. If the 

participant chooses to continue renting, he or she is provided with 

information aimed at increasing his or her knowledge of their 

rights and obligations in a landlord-tenant relationship. If safe and 

affordable rental housing becomes the goal of the participant, a referral is made to the Belmont Metropolitan Housing Authority. 

The Community Action Commission views success with its housing counseling efforts not only in terms of homes purchased, but 

also in delivering services which are needed by the customer. Part 

of the value of homebuyer education workshops is that participants 

are given the opportunity to objectively judge whether or not purchasing a home is in their best interest. Statistics show that if they 

choose to do so, their success in maintaining homeownership is 

strengthened. Other successes can be seen in the customer who is 

motivated to purchase, but does not have the down payment or is 

experiencing credit problems. He or she is provided with the mechanism to address issues that may lead to future ownership. Those 

who find themselves in a financial dilemma have somewhere to 

turn and someone to intervene on their behalf. 

38

Key partners in offering a successful program are banking institutions. The relationships are mutually beneficial in that the counseling programs offered by the agency enhances the ability of banks 

to make good loans. Program participants are educated about 

banks and lending practices, and are made aware of what banks 

require from potential loan customers. The partnership also serves 

to educate participants who might otherwise look to predatory or 

sub-prime lenders for loans. 

In summation, the Community Action Commission has been involved in homebuyer education and homeownership counseling for 

nearly 8 years. Through the concerted efforts of many partners, we 

as the community of Belmont County, Ohio have witnessed many 

families become homeowners. We applaud those families and individuals for their true grit, hard work and dedication in claiming a 

piece of the American dream. We look forward to a continuing relationship with funding agencies such as the Department of Housing 

and Urban Development and urge you to consider enhancing the 

federal government’s efforts in the arena of homebuyer education 

and counseling. 

Once again, thank you for the opportunity you afforded me today, 

and I would be happy to answer any of your questions. 

[The prepared statement of Gary F. Obloy can be found on page 

36 in the appendix.] 

Chairman NEY. Thank you for your testimony. 

Mr. Walsh? 

STATEMENT OF CHAPMAN WALSH, HOUSING DIRECTOR, 

GREEN FOREST COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, DECATUR, GA 

Mr. WALSH. Thank you, Chairman Ney and to all you other 

members of the subcommittee, especially Congressman Scott from 

our great state. 

My name is Chapman Walsh and I am the housing director at 

the Green Forest Community Development Corporation, a faithbased community development corporation located in Decatur, 

Georgia, right outside of metro Atlanta. Green Forest Community 

Development Corporation was really created and born out of the 

need that the Green Forest Community Baptist Church felt. The 

cries coming from the community led that organization to fund and 

go forward with a move to get granted a 501(c)(3) in 1996. Green 

Forest Community Development Corporation is a nonprofit and it 

really focuses on economic development and housing. 

The mission of the Green Forest Community Development Corporation is to create empowerment and networking for people 

through economic development, housing, youth, senior, and health 

initiatives, social ministries, education, and comprehensive preventive programs for persons of all ages. You can see that is a pretty 

lengthy list. I am really here today to talk about the housing division. That was the first division started in the Community Development Corporation at Green Forest. Basically, we started because 

everyone realizes the great need to create safe matriculation from 

renting to housing in society and communities. 

We started really with the Expanding the Dream initiative, 

which is a homebuyer education program, what many people look 

39

at as a first-time homebuyer program, but in fact many times people who have purchased homes before need housing counseling and 

need homebuyer education. 

During the first year of the program, we were able to help over 

300 families move to homeownership either directly or indirectly. 

At this point, we are well over 700 families who have directly 

gained benefit from working with Green Forest and from having us 

help them to understand the process of homeownership and key 

role players what they should be doing for you and exactly how to 

acquire a team that works for you. 

Green Forest uses a HUD-certified, Freddie Mac-certified and 

Fannie Mae-certified lecture series. We call that our education 

piece. Those classes teach potential homebuyers about the key roles 

of the realtors, what sort of realtor you should have if you are purchasing, the mortgage process, and the appraisals. It talks about 

renting versus buying. I think everyone wants to know how much 

it costs. We go on to talk about repairing your credit. I think that 

what we find is that that is the area that people have most difficulty with. 

Clearly, every successful entity in America works on a budget, 

but very few of our community members are taught formally anywhere how to budget. Consequently, financial illiteracy is a real 

issue with many people who come into and want to purchase a 

home. It goes across the board. No matter what their educational 

background, there are problems with budgeting. 

Credit is another issue. What we feel is that anyone who we 

interface with should be able to come in, learn the process of home 

purchase, understand who the sharks are, who to stay away from, 

who to get close to. We feel that the strength of housing counseling 

is really one-on-one meetings with the clients after this education 

period. Anyone can help someone move to property, but in fact I 

think the one-on-one counseling is what helps build a roadmap for 

an individual that allows that person to find success. As I said, financial illiteracy is a real issue. We use the CreditSmart curriculum. It is a Freddie Mac program to help people to understand 

the purpose of credit and to help them strengthen their credit profiles. 

Our housing counseling program was asked to go and get certified to provide loss mitigation counseling some years ago because 

of the great foreclosure rate in DeKalb County. That is where most 

of our work is done right now. Loss mitigation allows people to 

work out something with the servicers and stay in their homes. I 

think that the bottom line is that people who are facing foreclosure 

are really at a loss for which way to turn. Many times, they are 

taken advantage of. So again, one-on-one counseling is what works 

with that situation. 

To sum it up, the bottom line is one-on-one counseling is what 

works. Group counseling does not. One-on-one counseling is very, 

very expensive. We need help. 

Thank you. 

[The prepared statement of Chapman Walsh can be found on 

page 38 in the appendix.] 

Chairman NEY. I want to thank the panel for some very good testimony. 

40

I want to ask Mr. Obloy, according to the testimony, you take individuals from West Virginia that come over to Ohio for counseling, 

too? 

Mr. OBLOY. Correct. 

Chairman NEY. I know Canton, you mentioned in your testimony. Where is the closest in West Virginia to us? 

Mr. OBLOY. I believe that the family services in Wheeling was recently awarded or recently certified as a HUD-certified counseling 

agency. I did a check of the HUD Web site before I came to Washington and their name appeared there. 

Chairman NEY. Okay. 

Mr. OBLOY. Other than that, the nearest HUD-certified agency 

would be in the Pittsburgh area. 

Chairman NEY. Is every single group here certified by HUD to 

do counseling officially? 

Mr. JORDAN. No. 

Chairman NEY. You are not? Okay. Did you want to be? I was 

just curious. Did I ask a bad question? 

[Laughter.] 

Maybe we better get Mr. Weicher back here. 

Mr. JORDAN. As I mentioned, Mr. Chairman, we are a redevelopment housing authority and we created this homeownership center 

under those auspices. While we do meet the criteria, we are 

pleased with our current standing. 

Chairman NEY. Okay. Of the groups that have the HUD-certified 

counseling, the question I wanted to ask, if anybody can answer, 

does HUD tell every single group the same thing, that this is how 

you counsel; this is what you say? Is there a laid-out criterion that 

is given to you all? Gary, do you want to start? I am sorry. Mr. 

Walsh? 

Mr. WALSH. Mr. Chairman, in the loss mitigation area, there are 

parameters set by HUD to the servicers, but the people who call 

are all in different situations. So I think that we have to deal with 

them on a one-on-one basis. The counseling is different for each client. 

Chairman NEY. Do you ever get stumped? Is there somebody you 

have to call? Or have you dealt with the issues so long you are able 

to do it? 

Mr. WALSH. I think you have to work your way through. There 

is usually an answer and working with the HUD guidelines and 

the servicers as best we can. We usually can come up with a solution for the community member. 

Chairman NEY. But it is standard. HUD gives all of you the 

same guidelines; nothing changes. 

Mr. WADE. I would just like to clarify that a little bit. HUD provides broad guidelines for each of the eligible program activities. 

One of the things that we do is train the counselors who are actually doing the training in the neighborhoods. We have a defined 

curriculum that we use at our national training institutes. It is 

broadly available. We do five of those throughout the year, all over 

the country. The most recent was in Atlanta the last week of February. Essentially, this is the curriculum that we provide to all of 

the folks who we train and certify as homebuyer education counselors. 

41

Mr. DIAZ. I would just like to add, what HUD said, as Kenneth 

mentioned, broad standards. When we apply for HUD funds, we 

have to present the program curriculum, how it is delivered, when 

it is delivered, processing in between. The HUD staff approves that 

as meeting their standard. 

Chairman NEY. Okay. And do you think counseling is defined as 

much as it can be? Or does it need more definition? The reason I 

say that, in Cleveland, Ohio there was an article and the Cleveland 

Council decided they were going to have counseling. This gentleman thought his mortgage was going to be $447. It was actually 

$600 and some. He was in terrible jeopardy and there was a newspaper article on it. The counselor said, well, I don’t know; I was 

hired by the Council. The Cleveland Council put this together; I 

was hired; I was paid $79; I thought I was telling the right thing. 

I do not think they made a clear point of definition, and this was 

not HUD. This was the Cleveland City Council. I do not think they 

made clear definition, but do you think counseling has been defined, or in HUD’s eyes has been defined enough? 

Mr. DIAZ. I would imagine so. I guess when you were saying the 

question, the services that are provided in counseling, they tend to 

slide from one to another; for a homebuyer education to pre-purchase; to default counseling. There are a variety of services. So we 

took some pains to separate those, which HUD has accepted as definition for discrete counseling services. 

Chairman NEY. I have one brief last question because I know 

other members want to ask question, and we do have a third panel, 

and we appreciate your testimony. 

Ms. Grist, I wanted to ask you, you mentioned displacement 

counseling. What is that? Is that different than regular counseling? 

Ms. GRIST. Displacement counseling is a category that was in 

this most recent year’s HUD notice of funding availability as one 

of its eight eligible activities. In New York and in many cities, and 

I only know the urban areas, as the local economies have improved, 

as the real estate markets have heated up, low-income, often longterm residents can no longer afford market rents. One of the side 

effects of neighborhood improvement which we have all participated in is that a lot of people are now being displaced as their 

neighborhoods have become more attractive. 

So helping people to preserve their rights to the extent that they 

have them, to stay in their homes, to ensure that abuses are not 

taking place as people may be forced out of their homes by landlords who are eager to collect market rents, that is part of what 

we would call displacement counseling. It might even include getting people rent subsidies or even helping people figure out how to 

relocate. 

Chairman NEY. That has happened here in the District of Columbia. I have watched it in the 10 years I have been commuting. 

We probably ought to talk at some point in time. This bill has not 

addressed displacement counseling. It is not something we particularly thought of. That is why I wanted to see how much of it you 

were doing and maybe we will address it in this bill. 

Ms. GRIST. It is one of the eligible activities under the current 

housing counseling program. That is one of the nice things about 

the program, is that is has offered a great deal of flexibility, both 

42

for us to define what the needs are in our local community and 

pick among a menu, and to sort out where to place our emphasis. 

Chairman NEY. Thank you. 

The gentlelady from New York? 

Ms. VELAZQUEZ. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. 

Ms. Grist, in your testimony you mentioned how homeowners 

who miss payments on their mortgages are currently advised by 

their lenders to contact HUD’s housing counseling clearinghouse, 

which refers them to local agencies. You said that this process is 

not necessarily ideal. Can you explain a little bit further? 

Ms. GRIST. Sure. It is wonderful that people are given access to 

this 800 number, but it comes in an envelope from their lender 

which they might not want to open. One characteristic of people 

who are falling behind on their mortgage is they stop opening their 

mail, especially their bills. It requires that the homeowner make at 

least two phone calls, one to the clearinghouse and one to the counseling agency. 

So it is a good idea. It is a wonderful idea, but it has its sort of 

natural pitfalls for homeowners who are avoiding taking care of 

their situation as quickly as they might. The delay is really what 

causes problems. 

Ms. VELAZQUEZ. You also stated that some large counseling agencies have developed relationships with loan servicers in which they 

contact the counseling agency when one of their clients becomes delinquent. The housing counselor then contacts the delinquent borrower to provide assistance. You stated that you felt this system 

is more successful than waiting for the borrowers to contact HUD. 

Can you talk more about these agreements and explain their effectiveness? 

Ms. GRIST. A little bit. Our organization is too small to engage 

in that kind of operation because it requires considerable staff capacity, but I know that one of our colleagues in New York, Neighborhood Housing Services, which is also part of the NeighborWorks 

network, has had that kind of relationship. The advantage of it is 

that, particularly with conventional lenders, it gives an additional 

support to the homeowner. It takes some of the obligation off of the 

homeowner to reach out and make that first call. It can avoid that 

delay period. The key in default counseling is to get the homeowner, counselor and lender talking in a three-way conversation 

within the first 3 months of delinquency. So a process that allows 

a counselor to know who is falling behind early is in general a process that I think can work better. Maybe Neighborhood Reinvestment might know how that works other places. 

Ms. VELAZQUEZ. Would you? 

Mr. WADE. Sure. Yes, we have a number of groups who have that 

kind of relationship with servicers. Typically, you do need the customer’s consent in order for them to allow the home buyer education counselor to contact the customer. Oftentimes, we have encouraged our groups to use a simple release form. We have samples 

that we have provided to our groups that they can use with their 

customers, allowing them to be designated as the homebuyer educator. 

Ms. VELAZQUEZ. And that will happen at the time of the closing? 

43

Mr. WADE. It is best done at time of closing. Then obviously if 

you are doing follow-up work for customers, you can also have it 

done at that time. 

Ms. VELAZQUEZ. Mr. Diaz, a key issue for housing counselors is 

their ability to expand their work and build capacity to meet the 

needs of growing demands from individuals hoping to purchase a 

home for their families. Counseling agencies also need technical assistance to build their infrastructure and efficiently serve and attract more families. Can you comment on how support from HUD 

for capacity building and technical assistance will help housing 

counselors serve more families? 

Mr. DIAZ. Yes, our relationship with HUD and with the counseling agencies that are part of our network, HUD has been, rightfully so, taking on a role of making sure that all the dollars that 

we have invested are getting to the family, which is really critical. 

We have taken on the role primarily for technical assistance to 

make sure the efficiency quality of service things have occurred. 

How HUD could be supportive, and they have been supportive 

with us before, is as mentioned earlier, promote technology usage. 

We think it is a critical part. It is not replacing the one-on-one contact, but encouraging efficiency within the agencies because database technology can be a really useful tool once it is learned and 

used well. I think they can also support that activity. One of the 

key aspects with that is to get people using the database technology requires training. That sometimes is forgotten when they 

have this great technological thing. 

And then finally, HUD does have a lot of technical expertise, particularly on foreclosure counseling; some other technical areas that 

could be utilized by counselors in terms of training programs, but 

it has to be offered in a way that is useful to the agency. By that 

I mean it follows a work-flow. Sometimes that connection is a little 

harder to make than just offering the training once a month or 

whatever. 

Ms. VELAZQUEZ. So you feel that resources that are available to 

agencies that offer housing counseling services are not enough in 

the area of capacity building and technical assistance? 

Mr. DIAZ. Yes, that is definitely true. 

Ms. VELAZQUEZ. And that will go to the heart of the question 

that was asked by the Chairman regarding the information that 

was provided by the counselor to the Virginia person. I do not 

know, the question that he asked to Mr. Obloy. So Mr. Chairman, 

I think that this is an area that I think that we need to really look 

at. If we want to have counselors that are not only providing the 

information, but on top of what is happening, so that they could 

provide the effective services. 

Mr. OBLOY. May I say something? 

Ms. VELAZQUEZ. Yes. 

Mr. OBLOY. I appreciate your comment. To take that perhaps a 

step further as laws change, rules change, regulations change. 

Ms. VELAZQUEZ. Sure. 

Mr. OBLOY. In order to deliver a quality product, you need that 

technical assistance to keep the housing counselors up to date on 

what is happening with credit reporting; what may be happening 

44

with insurance underwriting; what may be happening with all 

changes in rules and regulations. 

Ms. VELAZQUEZ. Thank you very much. 

Thank you, Mr. Chairman. 

Chairman NEY. Mr. Scott? 

Mr. SCOTT. Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman. 

Mr. Walsh, thank you again for coming up and being a part of 

this for all members of the panel. One of the reasons why we are 

so delighted to have you, Mr. Walsh, is because the area that you 

are concentrating your counseling services is the highest in the nation in three very critical areas: delinquency, predatory lending, 

and foreclosure. 

It would be very revealing if you could share with us why this 

is so in South DeKalb, Atlanta, and especially given the fact that 

this area in the nation is not low income. It is more moderate and 

middle, and in some degrees higher income. In so doing, could you 

share with us in responding to those three areas of difficulty, how 

you feel this legislation, this housing counseling bill can be helpful? 

Mr. WALSH. Thank you, Congressman. I do feel that it is critical 

that the emphasis be placed on more counseling. You are right. In 

the zip code where my organization is located, 30034, it is a notorious area for predatory-type activities. Many of the homes are 

owned by elderly people who have really paid most of the mortgage 

down. They are great targets for people who can come in with some 

kind of scam, whether it be home improvement or some other type 

of scam; you know, flip the house and before you know it, they take 

all that is contained in the house. There is nothing left. There is 

no equity. These people many times are senior citizens and really 

do not have the ability to pay a second mortgage or a mortgage at 

the rate that these predatory-type lenders are offering. 

What we see in our area is that our phones are ringing off the 

hook with people who have reached a 90-day delinquency mark and 

have received this pamphlet from HUD, or from their servicer. 

Many times it is ambiguous because the servicers take this pamphlet and they kind of adjust it. It is very hard for some of the people to peruse through this minutiae and get to the HUD hotline 

and get to a certified counseling agency. 

Consequently, many of them get to us when they are 5 or 6 

months behind. It is very hard. I just know that our phone is ringing off the hook. We are following the HUD guidelines. We are 

using the remedies that are available to us, but I think more education and more information for our community is certainly necessary. 

Mr. SCOTT. How many families have you helped, certainly if it 

is measurable on an annual basis? 

Mr. WALSH. I think that we average probably over 200 counseling hours a month. That is split between housing counseling and 

loss mitigation counseling. But I think one of the things that we 

see is most of the people who are facing foreclosure or 60-or 90-day 

delinquencies have not gone to housing counseling. They have been 

targeted by someone that they trusted who put them many times 

in a sub-prime loan or charged high fees. That is a big part of the 

problem. 

45

Obviously, we are in very tough economic times and we are seeing a host of people who have lost their jobs, who have lost income. 

That is a factor also, but I think many of the times it is a matter 

of mis-education and no education. 

Mr. SCOTT. Thank you very much. 

Mr. Wade, in your testimony you mention a terminology, ‘‘full 

cycle lending.’’

Mr. WADE. Yes. 

Mr. SCOTT. I think you mentioned it also in connection with delinquency and foreclosure. Could you elaborate on what that means 

in relationship to foreclosure? 

Mr. WADE. Sure. What we have done in the development of our 

homebuying education efforts is develop what we call the full cycle 

lending approach. Essentially, it includes an organization that has 

a partnership with local lenders, local government in their local 

community. They have a pre-purchase homebuyer education program, and their staff received certification and training at our 

training institutes. 

We also typically have flexible loan products. Oftentimes it includes the provision of down payment and closing cost assistance 

to assist the homeowner. It would typically provide property services where the organization would provide home inspections and 

construction management if the home needs repair. And then it requires a post-purchase counseling component as well, so that the 

customer to a certain extent is helped all the way through the process on the front end, and then has some assistance on the back end 

as well. 

Mr. SCOTT. Thank you. 

Those are my questions for now, Mr. Chairman. 

Chairman NEY. I want to thank the panel. I appreciate your testimony and appreciate your coming to the Capitol. Thank you. 

We will move on to the third panel now. We have Doug Bibby, 

who is the president of the National Multi Housing Council. The 

Council is the national association representing the interests of the 

nation’s apartment firms. Previous to joining the National Multi 

Housing Council, he spent approximately 16 years with Fannie 

Mae, including having served as the organization’s chief administrative officer. Welcome. 

We welcome Anne Canfield who is executive vice president of the 

Consumer Mortgage Coalition, a trade association of national resident mortgage lenders and service providers. Welcome. 

Robert Couch is the 2004 chairman, kind of brand new, of the 

Mortgage Bankers Association, an association of 2,700 members 

representing mortgage companies and brokers, commercial banks 

and thrifts, and life insurance companies. Mr. Couch is the president and CEO of New South Federal Savings Bank in Birmingham, 

Alabama. New South is the largest thrift in Alabama with $1.4 billion in assets. 

William Smith is president and CEO of the Mutual Community 

Savings Bank in Raleigh, North Carolina. He is testifying today on 

behalf of America’s Community Bankers, a trade association representing the nation’s community banks of all charter types and 

sizes. 

46

William Spriggs is executive director of the National Urban 

League Institute for Opportunity and Equality. 

Odette Williamson is a staff attorney with the National Consumer Law Center. The center seeks to help consumers utilize the 

nation’s consumer laws on behalf of low-income Americans. One of 

the Center’s top priorities is providing support on issues involving 

consumer fraud, predatory lending and sustainable homeownership. 

We want to welcome the entire panel. Thank you for your patience. Does anybody have a flight, I should ask? Someone wrote 

me a note. I know you do. Anybody else? We will start out of order. 

Mr. Couch, and then we will go down the line, if that is okay. 

STATEMENT OF ROBERT COUCH, PRESIDENT AND CEO, NEW 

SOUTH FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK, ON BEHALF OF THE MORTGAGE BANKERS’ ASSOCIATION 

Mr. COUCH. Thank you, Congressman. Good morning, Chairman 

Ney, Congressman Scott. My name is Rob Couch. I am president 

and chief executive officer of New South Federal Savings Bank in 

Birmingham, Alabama. I am here today as chairman of the Mortgage Bankers Association. Thank you for inviting MBA to testify 

today on H.R. 3938, the Expanding Housing Opportunities Through 

Education and Counseling Act. That is a mouthful, I know. 

MBA strongly supports H.R. 3938, as it elevates and expands 

upon the Department of Housing and Urban Development’s current 

housing counseling activities. We applaud your efforts and those of 

Representatives Velazquez and Scott for introducing this bill and 

highlighting the important role that homebuyer education can play 

in combating predatory lending and assisting American families in 

making wise housing choices. While there has been a great focus 

on laws, regulations and stepped-up enforcement, the absolute best 

defense against predatory lenders is a knowledgeable and empowered borrower in a competitive marketplace. 

MBA is also pleased that H.R. 3938 recognizes the importance of 

housing counseling for those families who live in rental housing. 

Renters often have significant housing needs and the ability to discuss housing options with a competent housing counselor can stabilize families and help them avoid homelessness. Purchasing a 

home is often the biggest investment that the typical American 

family makes. It can bring great financial and social rewards, helping families to build wealth while they put a roof over their heads. 

However, buying a home is often also one of the most complicated transactions they ever undertake. H.R. 3938’s provision for 

a toll-free number and Web site will ensure convenient access to 

information that will assist them with the benefits and responsibilities of homeownership. Through the funding of HUD-approved 

counseling agencies and the certification of counselors, families 

across the country who require more personal counseling will have 

access to it. 

We support H.R. 3938 and again applaud your timely effort. In 

that spirit, I would like to share two important suggestions that 

MBA believes are essential to the effective implementation of the 

bill. First, the bill calls for updating and simplifying the mortgage 

information booklet. This booklet is provided to all borrowers at 

47

time of application. While HUD would be responsible for updating 

and expanding the booklet into several languages and cultural 

styles, the bill States that lenders would be required to provide the 

booklet in a format that is language-appropriate and culturally appropriate for the borrower. This requirement may give borrowers 

the impression that because they were offered a booklet explaining 

aspects of home financing in a language other than English, they 

could expect further documents, communications or assistance in a 

language other than English. This is just not practicable. 

Additionally, the term ‘‘culturally appropriate’’ is far too vague to 

be used as a reliable compliance standard. MBA believes a mandate requiring lenders to deliver the most language-appropriate or 

culturally appropriate booklet could become a litigation risk. MBA 

would like to work with the subcommittee on language that would 

achieve the intent of H.R. 3938, without the above-cited problems. 

There is a second issue I would like to raise. MBA believes that 

while software programs can be a great tool for consumers to use 

during the mortgage process, they can fall short in assisting a specific consumer with a specific transaction. A software program will 

not be able to accurately measure subjective issues. MBA suggests 

report language be included stating software programs certified by 

the office of housing counseling should not replace the sound advice 

of a financial or mortgage services professional. 

H.R. 3938 is a bill that takes HUD and housing counseling in the 

right direction. MBA applauds the efforts that HUD has made to 

date in prioritizing housing counseling and believes that it can 

have an even greater impact under the proposed office of housing 

counseling. 

Thank you again for the opportunity to present MBA’s views. We 

look forward to working with you and the subcommittee as it considers this bill. 

[The prepared statement of Robert M. Couch can be found on 

page 46 in the appendix.] 

Chairman NEY. I want to thank you. One quick question, in case 

you have to take off. I have raised this already. Would you all accept the fact that if you had a Web site you could go to and you 

print it and it prints in Creole or Farsi or Spanish. Would that 

work in the technological end of it? 

Mr. COUCH. It certainly has some possibilities as an intriguing 

notion, provided that HUD is responsible for the translation and 

the compilation of all the different languages that would need to 

be posted there. 

Chairman NEY. I understand about you putting the book together versus somebody else putting the book together because you 

could make a horrific mistake and it would not be good. What is 

your current liability? Do you have current liability on a certain 

amount of the information you distribute? 

Mr. COUCH. Unfortunately, just like Secretary Weicher, I cannot 

tell you the exact liability, but we are required to provide a notice 

to borrowers within 45 days of going into foreclosure. So there are 

requirements on us to provide HUD-mandated information to all 

borrowers, whether they are HUD borrowers or not. 

Chairman NEY. Thank you. 

Mr. Bibby? 

48

STATEMENT OF DOUGLAS BIBBY, PRESIDENT, NATIONAL 

MULTI HOUSING COUNCIL 

Mr. BIBBY. Thank you. 

Chairman Ney and distinguished members of the subcommittee, 

I am Doug Bibby. I am president of the National Multi Housing 

Council, a national association representing the nation’s most 

prominent apartment firms. 

NMHC operates a joint legislative program with the National 

Apartment Association which represents over 30,000 apartment executives and professionals who own and manage close to five million apartment homes. It is my pleasure to testify on behalf of both 

organizations today. 

We commend you for your leadership and we thank the members 

of the subcommittee for your valuable work addressing the important issue of housing in America, and particularly the topic of today’s hearings, successful homeownership and renting through 

housing counseling. 

I know some of you may be thinking, why is the head of an 

apartment trade group here discussing housing counseling? Well, 

as a matter of fact many of our members across the country partner with housing counseling agencies to do just that. They counsel 

people on a variety of issues important to the entire housing sector. 

Renters are the homebuyers of tomorrow and vice versa. Many 

homeowners become renters. Rental housing is a great benefit to 

many people in America, and our housing policy should not be so 

lopsided with tax incentives that it distorts what should be our 

over-arching goal in America: good quality housing for everyone, 

both owned housing and rental housing. 

Let me highlight today the Columbus Housing Partnership, a 

nonprofit housing provider. They offer various types of housing to 

meet the needs of individuals and families throughout central Ohio. 

CHP provides counseling to renters on a variety of topics: how to 

rent and maintain their apartment home; financial counseling; and 

homeownership counseling. CHP also provides residents with programs that bring computer labs, resident councils and meals to 

apartment communities. CHP, a member of the Columbus Apartment Association, partners with Wallick Properties Midwest, a private property management organization and a member of NMHC 

to manage most of its rental portfolio. Such partnerships not only 

provide housing-related counseling services, but also other valuable 

community services. CHP’s program is a commitment to provide a 

start-to-finish approach to housing services. 

We feel that appropriate counseling is especially necessary in 

light of the recent spike in the foreclosure rate, particularly among 

individuals who participate in homeownership programs with low 

down payment requirements. We support Congress in your quest to 

address this issue. NMHC and NAA feel that the time has come 

to ask whether homeownership above all else and at any cost is 

wise public policy and sound financial policy. 

It is essential that proposed homeownership initiatives include 

strong and substantial counseling and education provisions to educate consumers about the considerable responsibilities that accompany successful homeownership. No one is born a successful homeowner. To be a successful first-time homeowner, an individual 

49

should understand all of the factors that go into purchasing and 

owning a home, especially the financial considerations. 

If I were counseling someone or a family that is now renting an 

apartment on whether or not they should buy a house with zero 

down, I would say, if you have a marginal income, few cash reserves, and impaired credit history, I would be very comfortable in 

advising you to be cautious and be very sure you want to take on 

the huge emotional and financial challenge of owning a home. 

NHMC and NAA urge Congress to include programs that will 

benefit both renters and potential homebuyers in the proposed office of housing counseling, such as those I have outlined today. 

Thank you for the opportunity to testify. 

[The prepared statement of Douglas M. Bibby can be found on 

page 48 in the appendix.] 

Chairman NEY. Thank you very much. 

Ms. Canfield? 

STATEMENT OF ANNE CANFIELD, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, 

CONSUMER MORTGAGE COALITION 

Ms. CANFIELD. Chairman Ney, thank you very much for the opportunity to testify today. I would like to request that our full written statement be made a part of the record. Thank you. 

We applaud your efforts, Mr. Chairman, and the efforts of Congresswoman Velazquez, as well as Congressman Scott in introducing this legislation. The CMC has believed since its inception in 

the mid-1990s that housing counseling and education, if done correctly, is a key component to helping individuals first become and 

then remain successful homeowners. 

When the CMC first became actively engaged in this issue some 

years ago, we found that there was an enormous amount of counseling services that were available to consumers, but, consumers 

often did not know where to go for the counseling; and very importantly, the quality of counseling services varied dramatically. 

Our solutions to these two issues were several-fold. First, in 

order to address the problem of letting consumers know where to 

find qualified counselors, we suggested that the government publish an online list of qualified counselors or counseling services and 

their location. In addition, we suggested the government set up 1-

800 numbers that consumers could call and find out where to access these services. Furthermore, we suggested the government engage in a public advertising public relations campaign to let consumers know where these services are; that these services are 

available and within their reach by simply calling the 1-800 number that would be advertised, or by visiting the HUD Web site. 

Second, in an effort to improve the quality of counseling services 

being provided, we initially suggested having the government develop and make publicly available smart computer systems to be 

used as a tool to help counselors provide quality counseling services. In addition, we also proposed that these systems be available 

online so that consumers who had access to computers could use 

the systems themselves. 

Since the concept of utilizing a smart computer system to help 

improve the quality of counseling services was thought of some 

years ago, the industry has actually developed a number of similar 

50

programs that are available for consumers online. However, these 

systems are not necessarily being widely used by the housing counselors themselves to counsel consumers. Rather, the consumers 

who are computer literate are using them online themselves. 

Our third proposal was to have HUD create a counseling certification process to at least ensure that HUD-funded counselors 

would meet uniform high standards. That HUD certification process could eventually lead to a system whereby counselors would actually seek to be certified by HUD to prove to their customers or 

consumers that either they or their organization were providing 

quality services by utilizing the latest technology tools. 

Fourth, we suggested that HUD’s special information booklet 

that is required to be given to consumers under RESPA should be 

available online and that the booklet should include examples illustrating various loan products and how consumers might evaluate 

which products best fit their needs. While not the only solution, 

helping consumers understand a loan product and its terms and 

the responsibilities of homeownership will help to prevent consumers from falling prey to abusive lending practices. 

Finally, we suggested that the lender provide information to its 

mortgage applicants on how they could reach a qualified counselor. 

This legislation that you have introduced, which is very important, 

incorporates many of these proposals and we believe it is a very 

good start to making timely high-quality counseling services available to consumers across the nation. 

In addition, we are particularly pleased that the legislation 

places a high degree of importance on the public awareness campaigns that you have referenced in your bills. Part of the problem 

right now is that most consumers do not know that a 1-800 number 

exists at HUD. We also believe it is critical that consumers understand what options are available to them after closing, an item that 

has been discussed considerably today, particularly when they miss 

a payment. One of the biggest difficulties that mortgage servicers 

have is getting delinquent customers to communicate with them 

about their situation right away and work out a resolution or plan 

to bring the loan current. If a consumer is reluctant to call and becomes many months delinquent, it is much harder to craft a solution that works for both the consumer and the note-holder. The 

availability of timely counseling can be of immense help to consumers in this situation. Thus, we are very supportive of the legislation’s recognition of the importance of default counseling. 

Mr. Chairman, I would like to close with an example of how a 

housing counseling program can work effectively to help consumers 

make the right decisions. Some years ago, I used to work for GE 

Capital and one of the GE Capital companies was GE Mortgage Insurance Company. The late Gale Cincotta came to us a few years 

ago. She wanted private sector capital and resources in her neighborhood. She helped us understand the people in her neighborhoods and the neighborhoods and the communities themselves. We 

helped her understand what a financial institution needed in order 

to make things work on our end. 

Together, we created a series of affordable housing products. In 

fact, I think those were the core of the GSE’s affordable housing 

products some years ago. The first product was a community homeVerDate 0ct 09 2002 11:48 Jul 21, 2004 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00056 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6633 G:\DOCS\93841.TXT FIN1 PsN: MICAH
51

buyers product. It was an expanded-risk product where GE Mortgage Insurance agreed to insure loans with higher debt-to-income 

ratios for first-time Low-to-moderate-income homebuyers. However, 

in order for consumers to qualify for that product, they had to go 

through a counseling program. We test-marketed the product in 

five major Midwest cities. The product was distributed through 

various participating banks and thrifts. GE contributed counseling 

materials and the participating lenders put up the people, time and 

space to counsel. 

In the first year, we had 1-800 numbers running off the hook. 

People came into the lender’s offices, went through the counseling 

programs. At the end of the year, only 250 loans had been made. 

So we were wondering what went wrong. It turned out that everything was right. Many of the consumers, they actually went 

through the counseling, determined that they were not ready for 

homeownership yet. So the smart lending institutions actually 

helped those consumers straighten out their credit records, set up 

a savings accounts, and many of those consumers actually became 

successful homebuyers a year later. So we look at that and say that 

was not only a successful counseling program, but it was a successful homeownership program. 

With that, Mr. Chairman and Congressman Scott, thank you 

again for the opportunity to testify. We want to work with you to 

get this legislation enacted this year. 

[The prepared statement of Anne C. Canfield can be found on 

page 49 in the appendix.] 

Chairman NEY. Thank you. 

Mr. Smith? 

STATEMENT OF WILLIAM SMITH, PRESIDENT AND CEO, MUTUAL COMMUNITY SAVINGS BANK, ON BEHALF OF AMERICA’S COMMUNITY BANKERS 

Mr. SMITH. Good afternoon, Mr. Chairman and other members of 

the committee. My name is William Smith and I am the president 

and CEO of Mutual Community Savings Bank in Durham, North 

Carolina. I am representing America’s Community Bankers and its 

MBank Council. 

ACB represents the nation’s community banks of all charter 

types and sizes. ACB created the MBank Council in December, 

2001 as a standing committee within ACB to represent ACB’s minority-owned institutions. Mutual Community Savings Bank has 

$94 million in assets. We are 82 years old and are one of only three 

African American financial institutions in the state of North Carolina. We are a premier housing lender to underserved and emerging communities. 

As part of Mutual’s vision to educate customers before they are 

ready to buy a home, Mutual implemented the FDIC’s MoneySmart 

program in October of 2002. It went right to the heart of the community to educate consumers on the importance of financial literacy as a crucial first step towards homeownership. 

To further our financial education and homeownership campaign, 

Mutual’s branch managers must conduct a financial education session in their branches. Branch managers actively engage customers 

unfamiliar with the importance of financial education. I want all 

52

my customers to understand the importance of sound financial 

management and promote those values to their families. 

Mutual also has a trainer to assist our employees in using the 

FDIC MoneySmart module. This was the first step in assisting my 

customers on buying a home. One of our first financial education 

and housing counseling sessions was held at Maple Temple Church 

in Raleigh, North Carolina. There were 20 parishioners here, including parents and students. They were very engaged in understanding the two most important steps needed before one actually 

is granted a mortgage: the importance of understanding your credit 

and the value of good credit when one qualifies for an interest rate. 

This housing counseling education is especially important due to 

the increase in foreclosures. As you know, the highest foreclosure 

rates are for so-called sub-prime loans, which are disproportionately made in low-income and African American neighborhoods. In 

2003, the foreclosure rate for conventional prime loans was 0.53 

percent, but for conventional sub-prime loans, it was 6.6 percent. 

In ACB’s 2004 real estate lending survey, ACB asked its members if their banks required homeowner education or housing counseling for any of their current home mortgages or consumer lending 

products. Of the 401 responses nationwide, 52 percent required 

counseling for at least some loan products. Of those that did not 

require counseling, about half strongly recommended counseling. 

Those banks that do not require or strongly recommend homeowner 

education often cite the following reasons: it is not available in the 

area; it is not convenient; or it is too costly. 

I believe that housing counseling and education is a necessity. 

First, counseling should be made more universally available and 

encouraged by efforts to streamline the process and lower the cost. 

Therefore, I am a strong supporter of H.R. 3938. Specifically, I 

agree with the language in the bill on the scope of homeownership 

counseling the Department of Housing and Urban Development 

will undertake. I also support the language to establish a toll-free 

telephone number and a Web site which anyone can access for 

homeownership information. In addition, the language in the bill 

that addresses outreach to vulnerable populations is essential. 

In closing, owning a home is the greatest accomplishments a person can achieve. Educating customers and consumers is one of the 

greatest responsibilities we in the private sector can undertake to 

decrease foreclosure rates and boost homeownership throughout 

our nation. 

Thanks for allowing me to testify. 

[The prepared statement of William Smith can be found on page 

109 in the appendix.] 

Chairman NEY. Thank you. 

Mr. Spriggs? 

STATEMENT OF WILLIAM SPRIGGS, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, 

NATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE INSTITUTE FOR OPPORTUNITY 

AND EQUALITY 

Mr. SPRIGGS. Thank you, Chairman Ney and thank you to Congresswoman Velazquez and to Congressman Scott, for this opportunity. The National Urban League runs a housing department. I 

do not run it. So I want to say thank you to my colleagues Marvin 

53

Owens, who is our vice president for economic development and 

housing and Cy Richardson who directs the housing program under 

him. 

The League, first off, is a housing counselor funded by HUD. We 

were an initial partner in the design of the housing counseling program in 1968 with HUD. As such, we are designated as a national 

intermediary. Our affiliates are certified to do this work through 

us, and our experiences with the program have been good with regard to implementation. We have generally found that education 

and counseling services are of broad value for homeowners and can 

improve the market by facilitating effective consumer use and demand for a very wide range of housing and mortgage products. 

One of the key areas our affiliates concentrate on is mortgage delinquency and foreclosure counseling. Others have already talked 

about this rising problem in the country. We primarily offer delinquency counseling which specifically targets homeowners who are 

delinquent in repayment of their mortgage and who may or may 

not have been served a notice of foreclosure. Delinquency counseling usually occurs in one-on-one settings. The National Urban 

League seeks to assist delinquent borrowers as opposed to efforts 

from loan officers to structure a repayment plan. 

Our program also includes components that assist families looking to rent affordable housing. The affiliates serve as an information clearinghouse for affordable rental opportunities, and after determining that near-term homeownership is not desired or appropriate for a family, we make a referral on behalf of the family for 

the rental, while keeping the family in a database and contacting 

the family at a later date to encourage homeownership if requested. Housing counseling greatly benefits the rental market by 

moving renters to homeownership and thereby freeing up affordable units for other families to move up the housing ladder. 

The National Urban League does offer a narrow set of housing 

counseling services in partnership with Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, 

the Bank of America and Chase Bank. With those partners separate from our HUD-funded housing counseling programs, we offer 

a program to help potential home buyers qualify for mortgages, and 

National Urban League affiliates separate from our HUD counseling program operate first-time homeownership programs in ways 

that complement the HUD program. We encourage our affiliates to 

develop robust and comprehensive housing programs ranging from 

financial literacy, to first-time homebuyer classes, to housing counseling, to broader asset development strategies such as real estate 

investment and capital home improvements. 

We measure the success of our programs by a number of qualitative and quantitative indicators. First, we gauge the efficacy of 

the program against the National Urban League’s housing policy 

goals, which include, one, preserving and expanding the supply of 

good, quality housing units; two, making housing more affordable 

and more readily available; three, promoting racial and economic 

diversity in residential neighborhoods; and four, linking housing 

with the central support of services. 

Some of the short-term and long-term quantitative measures include the number of loans and people served, the number of new 

homeowners, the number of households relocating with housing 

54

search assistance, the number of very low-and moderate-income 

households paying more than 50 percent for housing. These are 

some of the measures that we use. 

In total from our HUD counseling activities, our affiliates 

throughout the National Urban League movement service well over 

19,000 clients in a year. The nonprofit program is indeed comprehensive in nature and application. 

Chairman NEY. Not to interrupt, but I would note that a vote 

has been called. We have a few minutes, but we want to get your 

testimony finished, and then also your testimony, and see if there 

are questions, so we don’t hold you. 

Mr. SPRIGGS. Okay. Let me sum up, then. 

Because of our relationship in terms of doing HUD counseling, 

we are very appreciative that you have this legislation to call attention to the need for home counseling. We would like to just 

make a few suggestions. One is in the area of certification, because 

we do it as an organization and it is very costly and capacity-building at the local level is very hard, if certification could be done at 

an agency level, so that we could then certify others, would be far 

more cost-effective. CBOs need to be included in all advisory capacities within the process in order to reach the neighborhoods and 

the people who most need it. It is really necessary to work through 

community-based organizations. Finally, we would hope that these 

wonderful ideas of using technology to reach those who may not 

have a counseling agency nearby, not be a diversion of funds away 

from the existing program. We really need funds on top of the existing program. The greatest problem that we are faced with is that 

while we are a successful provider of counseling services, this program has never been funded to the level that we could do the services at the level we know we have the demand for. 

[The prepared statement of William E. Spriggs can be found on 

page 113 in the appendix.] 

Chairman NEY. Thank you. 

We will move on as quickly as we can, because I want to see if 

there are questions by Mr. Scott. 

STATEMENT OF ODETTE WILLIAMSON, STAFF ATTORNEY, 

NATIONAL CONSUMER LAW CENTER 

Ms. WILLIAMSON. Sure. 

Good afternoon, Subcommittee Chairman Ney and members of 

the subcommittee, my name is Odette Williamson. I am an attorney with the National Consumer Law Center. At NCLC, I focus on 

issues relating to sustaining homeownership for low-income consumers, consumer credit and foreclosure prevention issues. I testify 

here today on behalf of low-income consumers. 

We support the committee’s effort to improve the level of housing 

counseling assistance offered to low-income consumers. The 

achievements of the housing counseling industry are numerous and 

best exemplified by the sizeable increase in the number of low-income and minority home buyers over the last decade. Now more 

than ever, a strong housing counseling industry is needed to sustain the gains made in homeownership among low-income consumers from the threat of predatory lending and from the steady 

rise in the foreclosure rates. 

55

One of the benefits that education and counseling can provide is 

to make homeowners less vulnerable to predatory lending. A 

knowledgeable counselor can steer homeowners away from predatory lenders to affordable alternative loan products. However, counseling is not a substitute for strong legislation to protect homeowners from predatory lenders. Only by changing the laws governing mortgage lending can we fully address the problem of predatory lending. Clear prohibitions to stop the worst practices, coupled 

with assignee liability, are what is needed to tackle this problem. 

Federal law must also provide additional protections to borrowers losing their homes to foreclosure. The law should mandate 

that foreclosures cannot go forward without lenders and servicers 

being first required to offer counseling and to evaluate the use of 

loss mitigation options. Similar requirements are already in place 

for FHA-insured loans. These requirements should be made applicable to all loans. 

To assist consumers in danger of foreclosure, the capacity of nonprofit agencies to provide default and delinquency counseling and/

or predatory lending assistance must be expanded. Currently, only 

a portion of the housing counseling agencies offer these programs. 

Providing these services in an effective manner is expensive. Welltrained counselors must meet one-on-one with consumers to assess 

their needs and provide direct assistance. An effective housing 

counselor can prevent foreclosure by acting as a mediator between 

the homeowner and the servicer. However, nongovernment support 

for this type of service is currently very limited. More funding and 

other resources should be specifically allocated to default counseling and for assistance to victims of predatory lenders. Federal 

policy should also encourage the private mortgage industry to provide more financial support for these types of services. 

More funding is necessary to support the housing counseling industry in general. The $45 million to be appropriated for fiscal 

years 2004 to 2007 under H.R. 3938 should be increased. This does 

not represent a significant increase from the current funding levels 

of $37.5 million. More nonprofit and for-profit organizations are 

providing housing counseling services. With more providers, the 

small pool of funding dedicated to housing counseling is being 

spread thin. 

In addition, the $45 million called for by H.R. 3938 will fund a 

new agency and many new initiatives. Without a significant increase in funding, the net result may be a reduction in the amount 

of funds directed towards HUD-approved agencies. Funding should 

be doubled to support this new agency and to provide adequate 

funding for the nonprofit housing counseling agencies that provide 

direct assistance to consumers. 

More funding should also be allocated to research. 

Chairman NEY. I will note, and I hate to do this. I feel so bad, 

but there are 8 minutes and 29 seconds left. So if you want to ask 

a question, we are running real short on time. 

Ms. WILLIAMSON. Okay. I will just sum up. In sum, the housing 

counseling and education industry provides invaluable assistance 

to low-income and minority consumers. A strong industry can be a 

benefit to consumers. 

56

I thank the subcommittee for the opportunity to speak today on 

behalf of low-income consumers. 

[The prepared statement of Odette Williamson can be found on 

page 158 in the appendix.] 

Chairman NEY. Thank you so much. 

Mr. Scott? 

Mr. SCOTT. Thank you very much. I apologize for this time 

frame. What a fascinating panel. There is so much I really wanted 

to get into. 

Ms. Williams, you are absolutely right in your testimony. That 

is why it is so important that if we move ahead with this bill, and 

we are fortunate we are. We are going to do it. Some of your comments are very pointed. We do have serious questions out there. 

The assignee liability is an issue that is a probability down the 

road. But in this legislation, we have some things before us. It is 

very concerning to me that we move forward with this, making 

sure that we have the resources to do the counseling; that we indeed have a toll-free number that is friendly, that is language-significant, that is going to do the job. 

One of the problems we need to clear up in this toll-free number, 

for example, in your testimony, Mr. Couch, you referred to the fact 

that through the current toll-free number and proposed Web site, 

this bill directly establishes this new department, to establish a 

new toll-free number; a toll-free number that is different from what 

is going on. As came from Ms. Canfield’s testimony, she didn’t even 

know a toll-free number existed. We need a toll-free number that 

is friendly; has a human being at it; that is language-specific to the 

diversity that reflects; and is targeted through marketing programs 

to get the number out there so we can get some help to the people 

beforehand. 

So it is a fight here just to get these things forward. I know I 

have to run, but Mr. William Smith, I would be very interested to 

know right quickly if we could, North Carolina has one of the 

toughest predatory lending laws on the books. In light of our counseling and in light of your work, very briefly, what is the result of 

that? What is the implication? Is that working? In terms of the 

counseling that is needed, does not it even bring forth a greater 

need for more resources to counseling? 

Mr. SMITH. You are right. I believe it is working in North Carolina. Our predatory lending laws are making the leaders in the financial institutions in North Carolina more responsive to making 

sure we are providing homeownership training, counseling and 

training. It is about leadership for the banks in North Carolina, 

particularly in my bank. I provide leadership in my bank by going 

out and doing homeowners counseling and making sure we give 

back to the communities, and are doing things in those communities to make homeownership available to the citizens of Durham, 

North Carolina and Greensboro, and we are. 

Mr. SCOTT. Thank you. 

Mr. Couch, on that point, I just wanted to make sure that we 

were clear that we are talking about a new toll-free number. I 

think you may have put that in your statement. I do not know. 

Mr. COUCH. If I said that, it was inadvertent. We are in support 

of a new toll-free number. There is an existing toll-free number 

57

that is mentioned in the notice that must go out when someone becomes delinquent, within 45 days of delinquency. 

Mr. SCOTT. One other thing, too, while we are at it, and we will 

just get out of here so we can go vote, you mentioned your support 

in the Mortgage Bankers Association, for this effort in education, 

financial literacy and so forth. We have $45 million there. As Ms. 

Williams mentioned, we know that that is a pittance compared to 

what we are going to need if we are going to make a difference and 

to do this. Because once you get this out there, we do not know 

what that final cost would be. 

There is certainly some discussion within the private sector of 

ways and means in which they can augment and assist us with financial support for the financial literacy programs. I certainly 

wanted to put that on the table as something that you all might 

take back to your industry as well to see what you could do. 

Mr. COUCH. Congressman Scott, I know you have to run, but it 

is worth noting that many of our members, just as my colleague 

Mr. Smith said, we do provide counseling services outside of those 

that are required of us. 

Mr. SCOTT. Thank you. Again, we apologize. 

Chairman NEY. Thank you. 

I want to apologize. I have a few technical things. First of all, 

Congressman Velazquez wanted me to personally relay that she 

does have questions, as I do too, but we will get them to you in 

writing. Also, I have for the record statements to be submitted 

without objection by Randall Pence, American Society of Home Inspectors, the AARP, Financial Services Roundtable, ACORN, Housing Partnership Network and American Financial Services Association. 

I also note that some members may have additional questions for 

this panel which they may wish to submit in writing. Without objection, the hearing record will remain open for 30 days for members to submit written questions to you, the witnesses, and to place 

the responses in the record. 

I want to apologize for these votes. You are a great panel. I am 

glad you were here to get on the record. Thank you very much. 

[Whereupon, at 1:26 p.m., the subcommittee was adjourned.] 

(59)

A P P E N D I X

March 18, 2004

60


93841.001
61


93841.002
62


93841.003
63


93841.004
64


93841.005
65


93841.006
66


93841.007
67


93841.008
68


93841.009
69


93841.010
70


93841.011
71


93841.012
72


93841.013
73


93841.014
74


93841.015
75


93841.016
76


93841.017
77


93841.018
78


93841.019
79


93841.020
80


93841.021
81


93841.022
82


93841.023
83


93841.024
84


93841.025
85


93841.026
86


93841.027
87


93841.028
88


93841.029
89


93841.030
90


93841.031
91


93841.032
92


93841.033
93


93841.034
94


93841.035
95


93841.036
96


93841.037
97


93841.038
98


93841.039
99


93841.040
100


93841.041
101


93841.042
102


93841.043
103


93841.044
104


93841.045
105


93841.046
106


93841.047
107


93841.048
108


93841.049
109


93841.050
110


93841.051
111


93841.052
112


93841.053
113


93841.054
114


93841.055
115


93841.056
116


93841.057
117


93841.058
118


93841.059
119


93841.060
120


93841.061
121


93841.062
122


93841.063
123


93841.064
124


93841.065
125


93841.066
126


93841.067
127


93841.068
128


93841.069
129


93841.070
130


93841.071
131


93841.072
132


93841.073
133


93841.074
134


93841.075
135


93841.076
136


93841.077
137


93841.078
138


93841.079
139


93841.080
140


93841.081
141


93841.082
142


93841.083
143


93841.084
144


93841.085
145


93841.086
146


93841.087
147


93841.088
148


93841.089
149


93841.090
150


93841.091
151


93841.092
152


93841.093
153


93841.094
154


93841.095
155


93841.096
156


93841.097
157


93841.098
158


93841.099
159


93841.100
160


93841.101
161


93841.102
162


93841.103
163


93841.104
164


93841.105
165


93841.106
166


93841.107
167


93841.108
168


93841.109
169


93841.110
170


93841.111
171


93841.112
172


93841.113
173


93841.114
174


93841.115
175


93841.116
176


93841.117
177


93841.118
178


93841.119
179


93841.120
180


93841.121
181


93841.122
182


93841.123
183


93841.124
184


93841.125
185


93841.126
186


93841.127
187


93841.128
188


93841.129
189


93841.130
190


93841.131
191


93841.132
192


93841.133
193


93841.134
194


93841.135
195


93841.136
196


93841.137
197


93841.138
198


93841.139
199


93841.140
200


93841.141
201


93841.142
202


93841.143
203


93841.144
204


93841.145
205


93841.146
206


93841.147
207


93841.148
208


93841.149
209


93841.150
210


93841.151
211


93841.152
212


93841.153
213


93841.154