alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON , DC 20460 

# JUL - 5 2011

O FFiCE .) F Mr. Michael P. Halpin, P.E. f,IR A ' 0 RADIA**~** Director, Division of Air Resource Management Florida Department ofEnvironmental Protection Bob Martinez Center 2600 Blair Stone Road Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2400
Dear Mr. Halpin :
Thank you for your letter ofJune 2,2011 , requesting an extension of the public comment period for the proposed "National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants from Coal- and Oil-fired Electric Utility Steam Generating Units and Standards of Performance for Fossil-Fuel-Fired Electric Utility, Industrial-Commercial-Institutional, and Small Industrial-Commercial-Institutional Steam Generating Units" (the Mercury and Air Toxics Standards rule), which was published in the Federal Register on May 3,2011. The proposal identified a public comment period of 60 days; that period would have ended on July 5, 2011. The U.S

. Environmental Protection Agency , however, recently announced an extension ofthe comment period by 30 days to August 4.
While we are extending the comment period, we are not seeking to extend the November 16, 2011 , deadline for signature ofthe final rule, and remain committed to meeting that deadline

. The 30-day extension will provide the public with a 140-day period to review the proposal. As you know, interested parties were aware ofthe posting on March 16, 2011 , of the signed proposal on the EPA ' s website (http: / /www.epa.gov/ttn/atw/utility/utilitypg.html). along with much ofthe pertinent supporting documentation (including the analyses used in establishing the proposed emission limits and the technical support documents). The proposal was published a little over six weeks later, on May 3, marking the beginning ofthe formal public comment period. This will provide the public with approximately 140 days to review and provide written comments on the proposed rule and supporting documents. It will also provide at least 60 days for other documentation that was not posted on the website until after the proposed rule was signed. Due to the substantive issues specific to this rulemaking, this comment period is significantly longer than statutorily required. Again, thank you for your letter. We look forward to the timely receipt of your comments.

Gina McCarthy Assistant Administrator

Internet Address (UR L) • http IIwwwepa gov Recycled/Recyc lab l e· Pnnted with Vegetabl e Ol18ased In son 100% Pl)slconsumer. Process Chlonne Free Recycled Paper
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 974 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 974

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 14, 2017

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To amend title 38, United States Code, to authorize the Secretary of 
 Veterans Affairs, in awarding a contract for the procurement of goods 
  or services, to give a preference to offerors that employ veterans.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Boosting Rates of American Veteran 
Employment Act'' or the ``BRAVE Act''.

SEC. 2. PREFERENCE FOR OFFERORS EMPLOYING VETERANS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 81 of title 38, United 
States Code, is amended by adding after section 8128 the following new 
section:
``Sec. 8129. Preference for offerors employing veterans
    ``(a) Preference.--In awarding a contract for the procurement of 
goods or services, the Secretary may give a preference to offerors that 
employ veterans on a full-time basis. The Secretary shall determine 
such preference based on the percentage of the full-time employees of 
the offeror who are veterans.
    ``(b) Enforcement Penalties for Misrepresentation.--(1) Any offeror 
that is determined by the Secretary to have willfully and intentionally 
misrepresented the veteran status of the employees of the offeror for 
purposes of subsection (a) may be debarred from contracting with the 
Department for a period of not less than 5 years.
    ``(2) If the Secretary carries out a debarment under paragraph (1), 
the Secretary shall commence debarment action against the offeror by 
not later than 30 days after determining that the offeror willfully and 
intentionally misrepresented the veteran status of the employees of the 
offeror as described in paragraph (1) and shall complete debarment 
actions against such offeror by not later than 90 days after such 
determination.
    ``(3) The debarment of an offeror under paragraph (1) includes the 
debarment of all principals in the offeror for a period of not less 
than 5 years.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the beginning of 
such chapter is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 
8128 the following new item:

``8129. Preference for offerors employing veterans.''.

            Passed the House of Representatives February 13, 2017.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
§ 1500.13 Purpose and scope of this subpart. ( a ) This section provides the process for the resolution of pre-award and post-award assistance agreement disputes as described in § 1500.14, except for: ( 1 ) Assistance agreement competition-related disputes which are covered by EPA's Grant Competition Dispute Resolution Procedures; and,
( 2 ) Any appeal process relating to an award official's determination that an entity is not qualified for award that may be developed pursuant to guidance implementing Section 872 of the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (Pub. L. 110-417, as amended).
( b ) Pre-award and post-award disagreements between affected entities and EPA related to an assistance agreement should be resolved at the lowest level possible. If an agreement cannot be reached, absent any other applicable statutory or regulatory dispute provisions, affected entities must follow the dispute procedures outlined in this subpart.
( c ) Determinations affecting assistance agreements made under certain Agency decision-making processes are not subject to review under the procedures in this subpart or the Agency's procedures for resolving assistance agreement competition-related disputes. These determinations include, but are not limited to: ( 1 ) Decisions on requests for exceptions under § 1500.4;
( 2 ) Bid protest decisions under 2 CFR 200.318(k);
( 3 ) National Environmental Policy Act decisions under 40 CFR part 6;
( 4 ) Policy decisions of the EPA Internal Audit Dispute Resolution Process (formerly known as Audit Resolution Board);
( 5 ) Suspension and Debarment Decisions under 2 CFR parts 180 and 1532;
( 6 ) Decisions to decline to fund non-competitive applications or not to award incremental or supplemental funding based on the availability of funds or agency priorities;
( 7 ) Decisions on requests for reconsideration of specific award conditions under 2 CFR 200.208;
( 8 ) Decisions to deny requests for no-cost extensions under 2 CFR 200.308(e)(2), 40 CFR 35.114(b), and 40 CFR 35.514(b); and
( 9 ) Denials of requests for EPA approval of procurement through noncompetitive proposals under 2 CFR 200.320(c)(4).
[79 FR 76050, Dec. 19, 2014. Redesignated at 85 FR 61573, Sept. 30, 2020; 85 FR 61574, Sept. 30, 2020]
H. Res. 731

In the House of Representatives, U.S., 

June 20, 2006.

Whereas in 2005, a small group of American Legion Riders 

in Kansas calling themselves the ‘‘Patriot Guard’’ began 

a movement to shield the families and friends of fallen 

service members from interruptions by protesters appearing at military funerals; 

Whereas individuals from Colorado, Oklahoma, and Texas 

later brought together diverse groups of motorcycle organizations across the country who rode to honor fallen 

service members, forming an organization known as the 

‘‘Patriot Guard Riders’’; 

Whereas the Patriot Guard Riders have since grown into a 

nationwide network, including both veterans and nonveterans and riders and nonriders, and is open to anyone 

who shares a respect for service members who have made 

the ultimate sacrifice for the Nation; 

Whereas Patriot Guard Riders attend military funerals to 

show respect for fallen service members and to shield 

mourning family members and friends of the deceased 

from protestors who interrupt, or threaten to interrupt, 

the dignity of the event; 

Whereas across the Nation, Patriot Guard Riders volunteer 

their time to come to the aid of military families in need, 
2

•HRES 731 EH 

so to allow the memories of the deceased service member 

to be remembered with honor and dignity; 

Whereas regardless of one’s opinion of the Nation’s military 

commitments, the families, friends, and communities of 

the Nation’s fallen soldiers deserve a peaceful time of 

mourning and should not be harassed and caused further 

suffering at a funeral; 

Whereas Patriot Guard Riders appear at a funeral only at 

the invitation of the fallen soldier’s family and participate 

in a nonviolent, legal manner; and 

Whereas the members of the Nation’s Armed Forces willingly 

risk their lives to protect the American way of life and 

the freedoms guaranteed by the Constitution: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved, That the House of Representatives expresses 

its deepest appreciation to the Patriot Guard Riders who—

(1) attend military funerals across the country to 

show respect for fallen members of the Armed Forces 

and, when needed, shield mourning family members and 

friends of the deceased from protestors who interrupt, or 

threaten to interrupt, the dignity of a funeral; and 

(2) in so doing, help to preserve the memory and 

honor of the Nation’s fallen heroes.

Attest: 

Clerk.
#### § 71.10 Public inspection of application.

Applications for approval of a package design under this part, which are submitted to the Commission, may be made available for public inspection, in accordance with provisions of parts 2 and 9 of this chapter. This includes an application to amend or revise an existing package design, any associated documents and drawings submitted with the application, and any responses to NRC requests for additional information.
CASE ANNOUNCEMENTS

*November 9, 2007*

[Cite as *11109/2007 Case Announcements,*2007-Ohio-5962.]

MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS

2007-1261.

#### State v. Ketterer.

Butler C.P. No. CR 2003-03-0309. This cause is pending before the court as a death penalty appeal from the Court of Common Pleas of Butler County. Upon consideration of appellant’s motion to supplement the record,

It is ordered by the court that the motion is granted. The clerk of the trial court shall certify and transmit to the Clerk of this court within 20 days from the date of this entry the following document: the transcript of the May 24, 2007 re-sentencing proceedings.
§ 75.21 General requirements. ( a ) Each licensee or certificate holder who has been given notice by the NRC in writing that its facility has been identified under the U.S.-IAEA Safeguards Agreement shall establish, maintain, and follow written material accounting and control procedures.
( b ) Each possessor of nuclear material outside facilities in the U.S. Caribbean Territories shall establish, maintain, and follow written material accounting and control procedures.
( c ) The material accounting and control procedures required by paragraph (a) of this section shall include, as appropriate: ( 1 ) A measurement system for the determination of the quantities of nuclear material received, produced, shipped, lost or otherwise removed from inventory, and the quantities on inventory;
( 2 ) The evaluation of precision and accuracy of measurements and the estimation of measurement uncertainty;
( 3 ) Procedures for identifying, reviewing and evaluating differences in shipper/receiver measurements;
( 4 ) Procedures, including frequency, for taking a physical inventory;
( 5 ) Procedures for the evaluation of accumulations of unmeasured inventory and unmeasured losses; and
( 6 ) A system of accounting and operating records.
( d ) ( 1 ) The procedures must, unless otherwise specified in license or certificate conditions, conform to the facility information submitted by the licensee under § 75.10.
( 2 ) Until facility information has been submitted by the applicant, licensee, or certificate holder, the procedures must be sufficient to document changes in the quantity of nuclear material in or at its facility. Observance of the procedures described in §§ 40.61 or 74.15 of this chapter (or the corresponding provisions of the regulations of an Agreement State) by any applicant, licensee, or certificate holder subject thereto constitutes compliance with this paragraph.
( e ) The requirements of this section are in addition to any other requirements of this chapter, relating to material accounting and control, that may apply to the licensee.
[45 FR 50711, July 31, 1980, as amended at 53 FR 19263, May 27, 1988; 67 FR 78149, Dec. 23, 2002; 73 FR 78613, Dec. 23, 2008; 83 FR 19612, May 4, 2018]
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002**

In connection with the accompanyingAnnual Report on Form 10-K of Greenway Technologies, Inc. for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2017, I, D. Patrick Six, ChiefFinancial Officer of Greenway Technologies, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:

1.       SuchAnnual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2018, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.       Theinformation contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2018, fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Greenway Technologies, Inc.

Date: April 5, 2018.

/s/ D. Patrick Six	

D. Patrick Six, Chief FinancialOfficer

and Principal Accounting Officer
Swanson , Bria n (OST ) 'PCTT - gS P 2W 0 "(yh'^ 3 From : alohi128@aol.co m '';i1 1 iVit N f(J F Sent : Friday , Januar y06 , 201 2 1:4

0 A M ' -SPORTAT'ONTo : Devany , Denni s (OST) ; EA S (OST ) i": ^ OPERATION' " Subject : Answe rt o Pacifi cWings'Petitio n fo rReconsideratio n " ^ ''" ' m .;AN^ S P f:3 0 Aloha ; A s a residen t o fKalaupap a fo rth e pas t seve n years , I a m i n oppositio n t o th e petitio n fo rreconsideratio n tha t wa s file d byPacifi cWings , LLC
. I anf i enormousl yhapp ywit h th e servic e an d professionalis m tha t i s currentl ybein g supplie d b ySchuma n Aviatio n Company , Ltd
. (Makan i Ka i Ai rCharters ) a t Kalaupapa , HI
. Sincerel y Jan e "Claire " Cappell e
### SERVED: December 17,2013 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF**TRANSPORTATION-.~** OFFICE OF HEARINGS

---'.1 

# :c :f

WASHINGTON, DC
IN THE MATTER OF SKYWEST AIRLINES FAA DOCKETNO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] (Civil Penalty Action) FDMS NO. FAA-2013- 0612

ORDER OF DISMISSAL Respondenthas advised the undersigned the within captioned matter has been settled and Respondenthas withdrawn its Request for Hearing. 14 C.F.R. § 13.215 states: "Atany time before or during a hearing, an agency attorney may withdraw a complaint orparty may withdraw a request for a hearing without the consent ofthe administrative lawjudge. Ifan agency attorney withdraws the complaint or a party withdraws the request for a hearing and the answer, the administrative lawjudge shall dismiss the proceedings under this subpart withprejudice." WHEREFORE, the within filed Request to Withdraw Request for Hearing having been read and considered, it is ORDERED as follows: , 1. Respondent's Request to Withdraw Request for Hearing be and is hereby granted; and 2. This proceeding be and is hereby dismissed with prejudice.

Richard C. Goodwin U.S. Administrative Law Judge
Attachment

- Service ListSERVICE LIST ORIGINAL & ONE COPY Federal AviationAdministration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite2W10001

Todd C. Emerson, Respondent's Counsel Director

- Government and Legal Affairs SkyWest Airlines, Inc., Respondent 444 South River Road St. George, UT 84790 TEL: 435-634-3530 FAX: 435-634-3505 Robert Spitzer, Complainant's Counsel Attorney, Office ofRegional Counsel Northwest Mountain Region, ANM-7 Federal Aviation Administration 1601 Lind Avenue, S.W. Renton, WA 98057 TEL: 425-227-1417 FAX: 425-227-1007 ONE COPY

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin,Administrative LawJudge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-5121 StaffAssistant FAX: 202-366-7536 FDMS No. FAA-2013-0612 (Civil Penalty Action)

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 3
#### LANGE v. O’NEILL-ADAMS CO.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department.

December 17, 1914.)

Master and Servant (§§ 276, 278, 2S1*)—Injuries to Clerk in Store—Condition of Stairs—Contributory Negligence—Proximate Cause oe Injury.

In an action by a dry goods clerk for injuries by falling down stairs with which the clerk was familiar, and which had been used by the public on a wet day, evidence merely that plaintiff slipped on the top steps, and that the steps were slippery, and she caught her heel on the top step, and fell down the whole flight of stairs, and that the top step was bro-

. ken in one place, and had a large hole in it, is insufficient to show negligence, or absence of contributory negligence, or that the hole in the step was the proximate cause of the injury.

[Ed. Note.—For other cases, see Master and Servant, Cent. Dig. §§ 950-952, 954, 956-959, 960-972, 976, 977, 987-996; Dec. Dig. §§ 276, 278, 2til.*j

Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Sixth District.

Action by Elizabeth Lange against the O’Neill-Adams Company. From an order granting a new trial, plaintiff appeals. Affirmed.

Argued November term, 1914, before LEHMAN, DELANY, and WHITAKER, JJ.

*460Samuel Ecker, of New York City (Jacob Stiefel, of New York City, of counsel), for appellant.

James B. Henney, of New York City (Edward E. Lindsay, of New York City, of counsel), for respondent.

*

For other cases see same topic & § number in Dec. & Am. Digs. 1907 to date, & Rep’r Indexes

WHITAKER, J.

The action was for personal injuries caused by the alleged negligence of defendant. Plaintiff was employed in the dry goods store of the defendant and fell down stairs. The only testimony upon which the verdict of the jury could have been based is as follow's:

> “I started, to walk down stairs, and just as I stepped down one step, the stairs were very slippery, and my heel caught in the top step, and I tell down the whole flight of steps. Q. State what was on the top step. A. Well, I slipped on the step. It was wet, and I fell down the whole flight of stairs. * * * The top step was broken in one place. It had a large hole in."

Plaintiff had noticed the condition of the step for four or five days. The evidence showed that the day of the accident was a wet one, and that many people came upon the steps from the street. The plaintiff was familiar with the condition of the stairs. We think that the evidence fails to establish negligence on the part of the defendant and freedom from negligence on the part of plaintiff, and it also fails to show that the alleged hole was the proximate cause of the injury.

. Order affirmed, with costs. All concur.
#### § 1400.1012 The OIG Administrative Remedies Division (ARD).

The OIG ARD prepares and forwards suspension and/or debarment action referral memoranda to the Suspending and Debarring Official and may provide additional assistance, in the course of action proceedings.

[81 FR 65857, Sept. 26, 2016]
Exhibit 32



                       President's Written Certification
                            Of Financial Statements
                       Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Statute 1350



     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Statute 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity
as president of 4net Software, Inc. (the "Company") that

     (a) the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-QSB for the period ended
         December 31, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
         of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

     (b) the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of
         such period and the results of operations of the Company for such
         period.



Dated: February 15, 2008



                                           /s/ Steven N. Bronson
                                           ----------------------------------
                                           Steven N. Bronson, President
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 1 (Monday, January 3, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 146-147]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-33084]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES


Meeting of the Advisory Committee on Minority Health; Correction

AGENCY: Office of Minority Health, Office of the Assistant Secretary 
for Health, Office of the Secretary, Department of Health and Human 
Services.

ACTION: Notice: Correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Health and Human Services published a notice 
in the Federal Register of December 21, 2010 announcing a meeting of 
the Advisory Committee on Minority Health. It was announced that this 
meeting would be held on Monday, January 10, 2011 from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. 
and Tuesday, January 11, 2011 from 9 a.m. to 1 p.m. Due to unforseen 
circumstances the meeting date has been changed.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Monica A. Baltimore, Phone: 240-
453-2882 Fax: 240-453-2883.

Correction

    In the Federal Register of December 21, 2010, Vol. 75, No. 244, on 
page 80055, in the 2nd column, correct the DATES caption to read:

    The meeting will be held on Monday, February 21, 2011 from 9 
a.m. to 5 p.m. and Tuesday, February 22, 2011 from 9 a.m. to 1 p.m.


[[Page 147]]


    Dated: December 28, 2010.
Mirtha Beadle,
Deputy Director, Office of Minority Health, Office of the Assistant 
Secretary for Health, Office of the Secretary, U.S. Department of 
Health and Human Services.
[FR Doc. 2010-33084 Filed 12-30-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4150-29-P
#### § 2900.15 Closeout.

In addition to the guidance set forth in 2 CFR 200.344(b), for Federal awards from the Department of Labor, the non-Federal entity must liquidate all financial obligations and/or accrued expenditures incurred under the Federal award. For non-Federal entities reporting on an accrual basis and operating on an expenditure period, unless otherwise noted in the grant agreement or cooperative agreement, the only liquidation that can occur during closeout is the liquidation of accrued expenditures (NOT financial obligations) for goods and/or services received during the grant period.

[86 FR 22108, Apr. 27, 2021]