alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 25
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 25 appear at 79 FR 75879, Dec. 19, 2014.

§ 25.425 For-profit organization. *For-profit organization* means a non-Federal entity organized for profit. It includes, but is not limited to: ( a ) An “S corporation” incorporated under Subchapter S of the Internal Revenue Code;
( b ) A corporation incorporated under another authority;
( c ) A partnership;
( d ) A limited liability corporation or partnership; and
( e ) A sole proprietorship.
# EUR-Lex - 31987D0304 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31987D0304

**87/304/EEC: Commission Decision of 12 May 1987 authorizing the Kingdom of Denmark to apply intra- Community surveillance to imports of certain textile products originating in South Korea which have been put into free circulation in the Community (Only the Danish text is authentic) **

*
Official Journal L 152 , 12/06/1987 P. 0031 - 0031 *

*****

COMMISSION DECISION

of 12 May 1987

authorizing the Kingdom of Denmark to apply intra-Community surveillance to imports of certain textile products originating in South Korea which have been put into free circulation in the Community

(Only the Danish text is authentic)

(87/304/EEC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community, and in particular the first paragraph of Article 115 thereof,

Having regard to Commission Decision 80/47/EEC of 20 December 1979 on surveillance and protective measures which Member States may de authorized to take in respect of imports of certain products originating in third countries and put into free circulation in another Member State (1), and in particular Articles 1 and 2 thereof,

Whereas Decision 80/47/EEC requires Member States to have prior authorization from the Commission before introducing intra-Comunity surveillance of the imports of certain products originating in third countries and put into free circulation in another Member State;

Whereas the information given by the Danish authorities in support of this application has been subjected to close examination by the Commission, in accordance with the criteria laid down by Decision 80/47/EEC;

Whereas the Commission examined in particular whether the imports could be made subject to intra-Community surveillance measures under Article 2 of Decision 80/47/EEC, whether information was given as regards the economic difficulties alleged, whether during the reference years set out in Decision 80/47/EEC there had been deflection of trade, and whether intra-Community licence applications had been submitted;

Whereas this examination has shown that there is a risk that imports of the products mentioned below are worsening or prolonging the existing economic difficulties; whereas, therefore, Denmark should be authorized to make these imports subject to intra-Comunity surveillance until 31 December 1988,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The Kingdom of Denmark is authorized to introduce, until 31 December 1988 and in accordance with Decision 80/47/EEC, intra-Community surveillance of the textile products of categories 16 and 21, originating in South Korea.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Kingdom of Denmark.

Done at Brussels, 12 May 1987.

For the Commission

Willy DE CLERCQ

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ No L 16, 22. 1. 1980, p. 14.
Editorial Note on Part 180
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 180 appear at 79 FR 75879, Dec. 19, 2014.

§ 180.750 What does the suspending official consider in deciding whether to continue or terminate my suspension? ( a ) The suspending official bases the decision on all information contained in the official record. The record includes— ( 1 ) All information in support of the suspending official's initial decision to suspend you;
( 2 ) Any further information and argument presented in support of, or opposition to, the suspension; and
( 3 ) Any transcribed record of fact-finding proceedings.
( b ) The suspending official may refer disputed material facts to another official for findings of fact. The suspending official may reject any resulting findings, in whole or in part, only after specifically determining them to be arbitrary, capricious, or clearly erroneous.
State of California

AIR RESOURCES BOARD

Executive Order G-99-077

WHEREAS, on December 10, 1998, the Air Resources Board (the ABoard) conducted a public

hearing to consider amendments to the California Regulations for New 1997 and Later OffHighway Recreational Vehicles and Engines;

WHEREAS, following the public hearing, the Board adopted Resolution 98-66, in which the

Board approved amendment of Title 13, California Code of Regulations, sections 2410, 2411,

2412, 2413, 2414, and the incorporated ACalifornia Exhaust Emissions Standards and Test

Procedures for 1997 and Later Off-Highway Recreational Vehicles and Engines,@ and adoption of

section 2415, with the modifications set forth in Appendices A and B thereto;

WHEREAS, the approved regulations were made available for public comment for a period of 15

days, with the changes to the originally proposed text clearly indicated, in accordance with the

provisions of Title 1, California Code of Regulations, section 44; and

WHEREAS, no written comments were received during this 15-day comment period.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the recitals and findings contained in Resolution 98-

66 are incorporated by reference herein.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the regulatory adoption and amendments adopted herein, and

any additional documentation identified as necessary for approvability under the federal Clean Air

Act and United States Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA), be forwarded to the U.S.

EPA for a request for waiver or confirmation that the regulations are within the scope of an

existing waiver of federal preemption pursuant to section 209 of the Clean Air Act, as

appropriate.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, in accordance with Resolution 98-66 that sections 2410, 2411,

2412, 2413, 2414, and the incorporated ACalifornia Exhaust Emissions Standards and Test

Procedures for 1997 and Later Off-Highway Recreational Vehicles and Engines,@ are amended,

and section 2415 is adopted as set forth in Attachment 1 hereto.

Executed this day of , 1999, at Sacramento, California.

Michael P. Kenny

Executive Officer

Attachment
#### GLEASON et al. v. JOHN L. SCHWARZ BREWING CO.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

December 4, 1914.)

Action by William H. . Gleason and others against the John L. Schwarz Brewing Company and Edward H. Gleason.

No opinion. Judgment modified, by striking therefrom *1088the paragraph numbered third, and, as so modified, affirmed, without costs. of this appeal to either party. Held, that under the contract the brewing company was entitled to charge only the prevailing market or agreed price, but that question was not within the issues.
§ 184.2 Applicability, effective date, and severability. ( a ) *Non-applicability of this part to existing Buy America Preferences.* This part does not apply to a Buy America Preference meeting or exceeding the requirements of section 70914 of the Build America, Buy America Act applied by a Federal Awarding Agency to Federal awards for infrastructure projects before November 15, 2021.
( b ) *Effective date of this part.* The effective date of this part is October 23, 2023. Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, this part applies to Federal awards obligated on or after its effective date. Awards obligated on or after May 14, 2022, the effective date of the Build America, Buy America Act, and before the effective date of this part, are instead subject to OMB Memorandum M-22-11.
( c ) *Modified effective date of this part for certain infrastructure projects.* If an infrastructure project that has previously received a Federal award obligated on or after May 14, 2022, but before the effective date of this part receives an additional Federal award obligated within one year of the effective date of this part, the additional Federal award is subject to OMB Memorandum M-22-11. However, if significant design or planning changes are made to the infrastructure project, the Federal awarding agency may apply this part to the additional Federal award. Federal awards for an infrastructure project obligated after one year from the effective date of this part are subject to this part, regardless of whether this part applied to previous awards for the project.
( d ) *Severability.* The provisions of this part are separate and severable from one another. OMB intends that if a provision of this part is held to be invalid or unenforceable as applied to a particular person or circumstance, the provision should be construed so as to continue to give the maximum effect permitted by law as applied to other persons not similarly situated or to dissimilar circumstances. If any provision is determined to be wholly invalid and unenforceable, it should be severed from the remaining provisions of this part, which should remain in effect.
# EUR-Lex - 31988D0240 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31988D0240

**88/240/EEC: Commission Decision of 14 March 1988 approving the plan relating to the examination for hormone residues submitted by Portugal (Only the Portuguese text is authentic) **

*
Official Journal L 105 , 26/04/1988 P. 0028 - 0028 *

*****

COMMISSION DECISION

of 14 March 1988

approving the plan relating to the examination for hormone residues submitted by Portugal

(Only the Portuguese text is authentic)

(88/240/EEC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community,

Having regard to Council Directive 86/469/EEC of 16 September 1986 concerning examination of animals and fresh meat for the presence of residues (1), and in particular Article 4 thereof,

Whereas, by document dated 8 July 1987, Portugal sent the Commission a plan setting out the national measures taken on the examination for residues of the substances referred to in Annex I, Groups A I and II, to Directive 86/469/EEC;

Whereas examination of this plan, as modified, has shown that it conforms to the provisions laid down in Directive 86/469/EEC, and in particular Article 4 (1) thereof;

Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Veterinary Committee,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The plan relating to the examination for residues of the substances referred to in Annex I, Groups A I and II, to Directive 86/469/EEC submitted by Portugal is hereby approved.

Article 2

Portugall shall adopt the necessary laws, regulations and administrative provisions for the implementation of the plan referred to in Article 1.

Article 3

This Decision is addressed to the Portuguese Republic.

Done at Brussels, 14 March 1988.

For the Commission

Frans ANDRIESSEN

Vice-President

(1) OJ No L 275, 26. 9. 1986, p. 36.
§ 910.364 Reporting on utilization of subject inventions. ( a ) Unless otherwise instructed, a recipient that obtains title to an invention made under an award shall submit annual reports on the utilization or efforts to obtain utilization of the invention for at least 10 years from the date the invention was first disclosed to DOE (Utilization Reports). Utilization Reports shall include at least the following information: ( 1 ) Status of development;
( 2 ) Date of first commercial sale or use;
( 3 ) Gross royalties received by the recipient;
( 4 ) The location of any manufacture of products embodying the subject invention; and
( 5 ) Any such other data and information as DOE may reasonably specify.
( b ) To the extent data or information supplied in a Utilization Report is considered by the recipient to be privileged and confidential and is so marked by the recipient, DOE agrees that, to the extent permitted by law, it shall not disclose such information to persons outside the Government.
[80 FR 53238, Sept. 3, 2015]
#### § 1108.330 Recipient.

*Recipient* means an entity that receives an award directly from a DoD Component. The term does not include subrecipients.
§ 52.11 Information collection requirements: OMB approval. ( a ) The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has submitted the information collection requirements contained in this part to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for approval as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 *et seq.*). The NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. OMB has approved the information collection requirements contained in this part under Control Number 3150-0151.
( b ) The approved information collection requirements contained in this part appear in §§ 52.7, 52.15, 52.16, 52.17, 52.29, 52.35, 52.39, 52.45, 52.46, 52.47, 52.57, 52.63, 52.75, 52.77, 52.79, 52.80, 52.93, 52.99, 52.110, 52.135, 52.136, 52.137, 52.155, 52.156, 52.157, 52.158, 52.171, 52.177, and appendices A, B, C, D, E, F, G, and N of this part.
[72 FR 49517, Aug. 28, 2007, as amended at 79 FR 61983, Nov. 14, 2014; 84 FR 23452, May 22, 2019; 88 FR 3306, Jan. 19, 2023]
§ 182.505 How are violations of this part determined for recipients who are individuals? An individual recipient is in violation of the requirements of this part if the agency head or his or her designee determines, in writing, that— ( a ) The recipient has violated the requirements of subpart C of this part; or
( b ) The recipient is convicted of a criminal drug offense resulting from a violation occurring during the conduct of any award activity.
#### § 2429.225 Whom in HUD does a recipient other than an individual notify about a criminal conviction?

A recipient other than an individual who is required under 2 CFR 182.225(a) to notify Federal agencies about an employee's conviction for a criminal drug offense must notify each HUD office with which it currently has an award.
#### § 960.3-4 Environmental impacts.

Environmental impacts shall be considered by the DOE throughout the site characterization, site selection, and repository development process. The DOE shall mitigate significant adverse environmental impacts, to the extent practicable, during site characterization and repository construction, operation, closure, and decommissioning.
Exhibit 31.1

              SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


I, D. Scott Wilkerson, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of BNP Residential
Properties, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

      (a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
      disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
      to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
      its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
      prepared;

      (b)Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
      procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
      effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
      the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

      (c)Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
      control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
      most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably
      likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over
      financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors:

      (a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
      operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
      reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
      process, summarize and report financial information; and

      (b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
      over financial reporting.



August 12, 2003                     /s/ D. Scott Wilkerson
                                --------------------------------------------
                                D. Scott Wilkerson
                                President and Chief Executive Officer

                                       26
<PAGE>
#### SILBERSTEIN et al. v. BLUM et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

January 29, 1915.)

Action by Solomon Silberstein and others against Harry Blum and others.

No opinion. Application granted. Order signed.
§ 3485.811 When does a debarment affect title IV, HEA transactions? ( a ) A debarment under § 3485.611(b) takes effect 30 days after those procedures are complete.
( b ) If the respondent appeals the debarment to the Secretary before the expiration of the 30 days under paragraph (a) of this section, the debarment takes effect when the respondent receives the Secretary's decision.
(Authority: E.O. 12549 (3 CFR 1986 Comp., p. 189); E.O. 12689 (3 CFR 1989 Comp., p. 235); sec. 2455, Pub. L. 103-355, 108 Stat. 3327 (31 U.S.C. 6101 note); 20 U.S.C. 1082, 1094, 1221e-3, and 3474)
227 So.2d 148

#### Robert F. FRAZIER v. MISSOURI PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY et al.

No. 50057.

Oct. 23, 1969.

In re: Missouri Pacific Railroad Company et al. applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Allen. 224 So.2d 179.

Writ refused. The judgment is not final.
§ 2424.20 Does this part apply to me? This part and, through this part, pertinent portions of subparts A through I of 2 CFR part 180 (see table at 2 CFR 180.100(b)), apply to you if you are a— ( a ) Participant or principal in a “covered transaction” (see subpart B of 2 CFR part 180 and the definition of “nonprocurement transaction” at 2 CFR 180.970, as supplemented by § 2424.970 of this part);
( b ) Respondent in a HUD suspension or debarment action;
( c ) HUD debarment or suspension official; or
( d ) HUD grants officer, agreements officer, or other official authorized to enter into any type of nonprocurement transaction that is a covered transaction.
# EUR-Lex - 31981R3131 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31981R3131

**Commission Regulation (EEC) No 3131/81 of 28 October 1981 on the classification of goods falling within subheading 19.08 B of the Common Customs Tariff **

*
Official Journal L 312 , 31/10/1981 P. 0055 - 0055 Finnish special edition: Chapter 2 Volume 3 P. 0093 Spanish special edition: Chapter 02 Volume 8 P. 0285 Swedish special edition: Chapter 2 Volume 3 P. 0093 Portuguese special edition Chapter 02 Volume 8 P. 0285 *

COMMISSION REGULATION (EEC) No 3131/81 of 28 October 1981 on the classification of goods falling within subheading 19.08 B of the Common Customs Tariff

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 97/69 of 16 January 1969 on measures to be taken for uniform application of the nomenclature of the Common Customs Tariff (1), as last amended by the Act of Accession of Greece, and in particular Article 3 thereof,

Whereas, in order to ensure uniform application of the nomenclature of the Common Customs Tariff, provisions must be laid down concerning the tariff classification of pancakes with cheese filling (approximately 48 % of the total weight) pre-cooked and deep-frozen, for consumption after rapid frying in oil;

Whereas the Common Customs Tariff annexed to Council Regulation (EEC) No 950/68 (2), as last amended by Regulation (EEC) No 3002/81 (3), provides for the classification under heading No 19.08 of pastry, biscuits, cakes and other fine bakers' wares, whether or not containing cocoa in any proportion;

Whereas neither the ingredients (in particular the cheese filling) nor the preparation (pre-cooking followed by deep-freezing) of the products in question constitute an impediment to their being considered as goods falling within heading No 19.08 ; whereas, within this heading, subheading 19.08 B must be chosen for the products in question;

Whereas the measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee on Common Customs Tariff Nomenclature,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Pancakes with cheese filling (approximately 48 % of the total weight), pre-cooked and deep-frozen for consumption after rapid frying in oil shall fall within Common Customs Tariff subheading

19.08 Pastry, biscuits, cakes and other fine bakers' wares, whether or not containing cocoa in any proportion:

B. Other.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the 21st day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 28 October 1981.

For the Commission

Karl-Heinz NARJES

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ No L 14, 21.1.1969, p. 1. (2) OJ No L 172, 22.7.1968, p. 1. (3) OJ No L 301, 22.10.1981, p. 1.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-29-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-01-1997
<CASH>                                          14,635
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   53,465
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    344,753
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               432,874
<PP&E>                                         712,404
<DEPRECIATION>                                 294,379
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 861,758
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          265,027
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        19,634
<OTHER-SE>                                     539,762
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   861,758
<SALES>                                        710,934
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                          522,156
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  687,754
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 23,180
<INCOME-TAX>                                     9,100
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             14,080
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    14,080
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .36
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .36
        

</TABLE>