Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 2 / Tuesday, January 4, 2011 / Notices 323 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

Bureau of Industry and Security 

Information Systems Technical 

Advisory Committee; Notice of 

Partially Closed Meeting 

The Information Systems Technical 

Advisory Committee (ISTAC) will meet 

on January 26 and 27, 2011, 9 a.m., at 

the Space and Naval Warfare Systems 

Center (SPAWAR), Building 33, Cloud 

Room, 53560 Hull Street, San Diego, 

California 92152. The Committee 

advises the Office of the Assistant 

Secretary for Export Administration on 

technical questions that affect the level 

of export controls applicable to 

information systems equipment and 

technology. 

Wednesday, January 26 

Open Session 

1. Welcome and Introductions 

2. Working Groups Reports 

3. Intel Technology Roadmap 

4. EDA Overview and Relation to 

Category 3 

5. Godson Microprocessor Project 

6. Autonomous Vehicle Project 

7. Cloud Computing, Technology and 

Security Issues 

Thursday, January 27 

Closed Session 

8. Discussion of matters determined to 

be exempt from the provisions 

relating to public meetings found in 5 

U.S.C. app. 2 §§ 10(a)(1) and 10(a)(3). 

The open session will be accessible 

via teleconference to 20 participants on 

a first come, first serve basis. To join the 

conference, submit inquiries to Ms. 

Yvette Springer at 

Yspringer@bis.doc.gov, no later than 

January 19, 2011. 

A limited number of seats will be 

available for the public session. 

Reservations are not accepted. To the 

extent time permits, members of the 

public may present oral statements to 

the Committee. The public may submit 

written statements at any time before or 

after the meeting. However, to facilitate 

distribution of public presentation 

materials to Committee members, the 

Committee suggests that public 

presentation materials or comments be 

forwarded before the meeting to Ms. 

Springer. 

The Assistant Secretary for 

Administration, with the concurrence of 

the delegate of the General Counsel, 

formally determined on December 14, 

2010, pursuant to Section 10(d) of the 

Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 

amended (5 U.S.C. app. 2 § (10)(d))), 

that the portion of the meeting 

concerning trade secrets and 

commercial or financial information 

deemed privileged or confidential as 

described in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(4) and the 

portion of the meeting concerning 

matters the disclosure of which would 

be likely to frustrate significantly 

implementation of an agency action as 

described in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(9)(B) shall 

be exempt from the provisions relating 

to public meetings found in 5 U.S.C. 

app. 2 §§ 10(a)(1) and 10(a)(3). The 

remaining portions of the meeting will 

be open to the public. 

For more information, call Yvette 

Springer at (202) 482–2813. 

Dated: December 29, 2010. 

Yvette Springer, 

Committee Liaison Officer. 

[FR Doc. 2010–33220 Filed 1–3–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–JT–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

Bureau of Industry and Security 

Sensors and Instrumentation 

Technical Advisory Committee; Notice 

of Partially Closed Meeting 

The Sensors and Instrumentation 

Technical Advisory Committee (SITAC) 

will meet on January 25, 2011, 9:30 

a.m., in the Herbert C. Hoover Building, 

Room 3884, 14th Street between 

Constitution and Pennsylvania 

Avenues, NW., Washington, DC. The 

Committee advises the Office of the 

Assistant Secretary for Export 

Administration on technical questions 

that affect the level of export controls 

applicable to sensors and 

instrumentation equipment and 

technology. 

Agenda: 

Public Session: 

1. Welcome and Introductions. 

2. Remarks from the Bureau of 

Industry and Security Management. 

3. Industry Presentations. 

4. New Business. 

Closed Session: 

5. Discussion of matters determined to 

be exempt from the provisions relating 

to public meetings found in 5 U.S.C. 

app. 2 §§ 10(a)(1) and 10(a)(3). 

The open session will be accessible 

via teleconference to 20 participants on 

a first come, first serve basis. To join the 

conference, submit inquiries to Ms. 

Yvette Springer at 

Yspringer@bis.doc.gov no later than 

January 18, 2011. 

A limited number of seats will be 

available during the public session of 

the meeting. Reservations are not 

accepted. To the extent that time 

permits, members of the public may 

present oral statements to the 

Committee. The public may submit 

written statements at any time before or 

after the meeting. However, to facilitate 

distribution of public presentation 

materials to the Committee members, 

the Committee suggests that the 

materials be forwarded before the 

meeting to Ms. Springer. 

The Assistant Secretary for 

Administration, with the concurrence of 

the General Counsel, formally 

determined on December 14, 2010 

pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal 

Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 

U.S.C. app. 2 § 10(d)), that the portion 

of this meeting dealing with predecisional changes to the Commerce 

Control List and U.S. export control 

policies shall be exempt from the 

provisions relating to public meetings 

found in 5 U.S.C. app. 2 §§ 10(a)(1) and 

10(a)(3). The remaining portions of the 

meeting will be open to the public. 

For more information contact Yvette 

Springer on (202) 482–2813. 

Dated: December 29, 2010. 

Yvette Springer, 

Committee Liaison Officer. 

[FR Doc. 2010–33222 Filed 1–3–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–JT–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–967] 

Aluminum Extrusions From the 

People’s Republic of China: Notice of 

Amended Preliminary Determination of 

Sales at Less Than Fair Value 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce 

DATES: Effective Date: January 4, 2011. 

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce 

(‘‘Department’’) has determined that it 

made certain significant ministerial 

errors in the preliminary determination 

of sales at less than fair value in the 

antidumping duty investigation of 

aluminum extrusions from the People’s 

Republic of China (‘‘PRC’’) as described 

below in the SUPPLEMENTARY

INFORMATION section of this notice. The 

Department has corrected these errors 

and has re-calculated the antidumping 

duty margins for a mandatory 

respondent and for exporters eligible for 

a separate rate as shown below in the 

‘‘Amended Preliminary Determination’’ 

section of this notice. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul 

Stolz or Eugene Degnan, Import 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
324 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 2 / Tuesday, January 4, 2011 / Notices 

Administration, International Trade 

Administration, U.S. Department of 

Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution 

Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; 

telephone: (202) 482–4474, or 482–0414, 

respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

On November 12, 2010, the 

Department published its affirmative 

preliminary determination in this 

proceeding that aluminum extrusions 

from the PRC are being, or are likely to 

be, sold in the United States at less than 

fair value, as provided by section 773 of 

the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the 

‘‘Act’’). See Aluminum Extrusions From 

the People’s Republic of China: Notice 

of Preliminary Determination of Sales at 

Less Than Fair Value, and Preliminary 

Determination of Targeted Dumping, 75 

FR 69403 (November 12, 2010) 

(‘‘Preliminary Determination’’). 

On November 15, 2010, and 

November 16, 2010, the Guang Ya 

Aluminium Industries Co., Ltd., Foshan 

Guangcheng Aluminium Co., Ltd., Kong 

Ah International Company Limited, and 

Guang Ya Aluminium Industries (Hong 

Kong) Limited, (collectively, ‘‘Guang Ya 

Group’’) and Zhaoqing New Zhongya 

Aluminum Co., Ltd., Zhongya Shaped 

Aluminium (HK) Holding Limited, and 

Karlton Aluminum Company Ltd. 

(collectively ‘‘New Zhongya’’) submitted 

timely ministerial error allegations with 

respect to the Department’s Preliminary 

Determination. Therefore, in accordance 

to section 351.224(e) of the 

Department’s regulations, we have made 

changes, as discussed below, to the 

Preliminary Determination. 

Period of Investigation 

The period of investigation (‘‘POI’’) is 

July 1, 2009, through December 31, 

2009. This period corresponds to the 

two most recent fiscal quarters prior to 

the month of the filing of the petition, 

which was March 2009. See 19 CFR 

351.204(b)(1). 

Scope of Investigation 

The merchandise covered by this 

investigation is aluminum extrusions 

which are shapes and forms, produced 

by an extrusion process, made from 

aluminum alloys having metallic 

elements corresponding to the alloy 

series designations published by The 

Aluminum Association commencing 

with the numbers 1, 3, and 6 (or 

proprietary equivalents or other 

certifying body equivalents). 

Specifically, the subject merchandise 

made from aluminum alloy with an 

Aluminum Association series 

designation commencing with the 

number 1 contains not less than 99 

percent aluminum by weight. The 

subject merchandise made from 

aluminum alloy with an Aluminum 

Association series designation 

commencing with the number 3 

contains manganese as the major 

alloying element, with manganese 

accounting for not more than 3.0 

percent of total materials by weight. The 

subject merchandise made from an 

aluminum alloy with an Aluminum 

Association series designation 

commencing with the number 6 

contains magnesium and silicon as the 

major alloying elements, with 

magnesium accounting for at least 0.1 

percent but not more than 2.0 percent of 

total materials by weight, and silicon 

accounting for at least 0.1 percent but 

not more than 3.0 percent of total 

materials by weight. The subject 

aluminum extrusions are properly 

identified by a four-digit alloy series 

without either a decimal point or 

leading letter. Illustrative examples from 

among the approximately 160 registered 

alloys that may characterize the subject 

merchandise are as follows: 1350, 3003, 

and 6060. 

Aluminum extrusions are produced 

and imported in a wide variety of 

shapes and forms, including, but not 

limited to, hollow profiles, other solid 

profiles, pipes, tubes, bars, and rods. 

Aluminum extrusions that are drawn 

subsequent to extrusion (‘‘drawn 

aluminum’’) are also included in the 

scope. 

Aluminum extrusions are produced 

and imported with a variety of finishes 

(both coatings and surface treatments), 

and types of fabrication. The types of 

coatings and treatments applied to 

subject aluminum extrusions include, 

but are not limited to, extrusions that 

are mill finished (i.e., without any 

coating or further finishing), brushed, 

buffed, polished, anodized (including 

bright-dip anodized), liquid painted, or 

powder coated. Aluminum extrusions 

may also be fabricated, i.e., prepared for 

assembly. Such operations would 

include, but are not limited to, 

extrusions that are cut-to-length, 

machined, drilled, punched, notched, 

bent, stretched, knurled, swedged, 

mitered, chamfered, threaded, and spun. 

The subject merchandise includes 

aluminum extrusions that are finished 

(coated, painted, etc.), fabricated, or any 

combination thereof. 

Subject aluminum extrusions may be 

described at the time of importation as 

parts for final finished products that are 

assembled after importation, including, 

but not limited to, window frames, door 

frames, solar panels, curtain walls, or 

furniture. Such parts that otherwise 

meet the definition of aluminum 

extrusions are included in the scope. 

The scope includes aluminum 

extrusions that are attached (e.g., by 

welding or fasteners) to form 

subassemblies, i.e., partially assembled 

merchandise. 

Subject extrusions may be identified 

with reference to their end use, such as 

heat sinks, door thresholds, or carpet 

trim. Such goods are subject 

merchandise if they otherwise meet the 

scope definition, regardless of whether 

they are finished products and ready for 

use at the time of importation. 

The following aluminum extrusion 

products are excluded: Aluminum 

extrusions made from aluminum alloy 

with an Aluminum Association series 

designation commencing with the 

number 2 and containing in excess of 

1.5 percent copper by weight; aluminum 

extrusions made from aluminum alloy 

with an Aluminum Association series 

designation commencing with the 

number 5 and containing in excess of 

1.0 percent magnesium by weight; and 

aluminum extrusions made from 

aluminum alloy with an Aluminum 

Association series designation 

commencing with the number 7 and 

containing in excess of 2.0 percent zinc 

by weight. 

The scope also excludes finished 

merchandise containing aluminum 

extrusions as parts that are fully and 

permanently assembled and completed 

at the time of entry, such as finished 

windows with glass, doors, picture 

frames, and solar panels. The scope also 

excludes finished goods containing 

aluminum extrusions that are entered 

unassembled in a ‘‘kit.’’ A kit is 

understood to mean a packaged 

combination of parts that contains, at 

the time of importation, all of the 

necessary parts to fully assemble a final 

finished good. 

The scope also excludes aluminum 

alloy sheet or plates produced by other 

than the extrusion process, such as 

aluminum products produced by a 

method of casting. Cast aluminum 

products are properly identified by four 

digits with a decimal point between the 

third and fourth digit. A letter may also 

precede the four digits. The following 

Aluminum Association designations are 

representative of aluminum alloys for 

casting: 208.0, 295.0, 308.0, 355.0, 

C355.0, 356.0, A356.0, A357.0, 360.0, 

366.0, 380.0, A380.0, 413.0, 443.0, 

514.0, 518.1, and 712.0. The scope also 

excludes pure, unwrought aluminum in 

any form. 

The scope also excludes collapsible 

tubular containers composed of metallic 

elements corresponding to alloy code 

1080A as designated by the Aluminum 

Association where the tubular container 

(excluding the nozzle) meets each of the 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 2 / Tuesday, January 4, 2011 / Notices 325 

1This entity is also known as New Asia 

Aluminum & Stainless Steel Product Co., Ltd. 

2See October 27, 2010, memorandum from Paul 

Stolz, Senior International Trade Compliance 

Analyst, to Eugene Degnan, Program Manager, 

regarding the Preliminary Determination Analysis 

Memorandum for Guang Ya Aluminium Industries 

Co., Ltd., Foshan Guangcheng Aluminium Co., Ltd., 

Kong Ah International Company Limited, and 

Guang Ya Aluminium Industries (Hong Kong) 

Limited, (collectively, ‘‘GYG’’) and (2) Zhaoqing 

New Zhongya Aluminum Co., Ltd., Zhongya 

Shaped Aluminium (HK) Holding Limited 

(collectively ‘‘NZ’’) and (3) Xinya Aluminum & 

Stainless Steel Product Co., Ltd. (‘‘Xinya’’). 

following dimensional characteristics: 

(1) Length of 37 mm or 62 mm, (2) outer 

diameter of 11.0 mm or 12.7 mm, and 

(3) wall thickness not exceeding 0.13 

mm. 

Imports of the subject merchandise 

are provided for under the following 

categories of the Harmonized Tariff 

Schedule of the United States (‘‘HTS’’): 

7604.21.0000, 7604.29.1000, 

7604.29.3010, 7604.29.3050, 

7604.29.5030, 7604.29.5060, 

7608.20.0030, and 7608.20.0090. The 

subject merchandise entered as parts of 

other aluminum products may be 

classifiable under the following 

additional Chapter 76 subheadings: 

7610.10, 7610.90, 7615.19, 7615.20, and 

7616.99 as well as under other HTS 

chapters. While HTS subheadings are 

provided for convenience and customs 

purposes, the written description of the 

scope in this proceeding is dispositive. 

Significant Ministerial Error 

Ministerial errors are defined in 

section 735(e) of the Act as ‘‘errors in 

addition, subtraction, or other 

arithmetic function, clerical errors 

resulting from inaccurate copying, 

duplication, or the like, and any other 

type of unintentional error which the 

administering authority considers 

ministerial.’’ Section 351.224(e) of the 

Department’s regulations provides that 

the Department ‘‘will analyze any 

comments received and, if appropriate, 

correct any significant ministerial error 

by amending the preliminary 

determination * * *.’’ See 19 CFR 

361.224(e). A significant ministerial 

error is defined as a ministerial error, 

the correction of which, either singly or 

in combination with other errors, would 

result in (1) a change of at least five 

absolute percentage points in, but not 

less than 25 percent of, the weightedaverage dumping margin calculated in 

the original (erroneous) preliminary 

determination, or (2) a difference 

between a weighted-average dumping 

margin of zero (or de minimis) and a 

weighted-average dumping margin of 

greater than de minimis or vice versa. 

See 19 CFR 351.224(g). 

In accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(e) 

and (g)(1), the Department is amending 

the preliminary determination of sales 

at less than fair value in the 

antidumping duty investigation of 

aluminum extrusions from the PRC to 

reflect the correction of significant 

ministerial errors it made in the margin 

calculations regarding the mandatory 

respondent in this investigation Guang 

Ya Group, New Zhongya, and Xinya 

Aluminum & Stainless Steel Product 

Co., Ltd. (‘‘Xinya’’) 1 (collectively ‘‘Guang 

Ya Group/New Zhongya/Xinya’’). 

Ministerial-Error Allegation 

The Guang Ya Group 

The Guang Ya Group argues that the 

Department erred by inadvertently 

applying an incorrect ratio for the 

Guang Ya Group’s U.S. indirect selling 

expense in the SAS margin calculation 

program by coding the decimal point in 

the wrong place. The Department 

agrees, and finds that this error qualifies 

as a ministerial error in accordance with 

section 735(e) of the Act. Moreover, the 

Department determines that correcting 

this error would result in a change of at 

least five absolute percentage points in, 

but not less than 25 percent of, the 

weighted-average dumping margin 

calculated in the original (erroneous) 

preliminary determination, and thus has 

corrected the error. 

New Zhongya 

New Zhongya argues that the 

Department committed a ministerial 

error by failing to correct respondent’s 

database reporting errors relating to (1) 

certain movement expenses, and (2) the 

‘‘packing-paper’’ consumption factor of 

production. 

With respect to New Zhongya’s 

assertion that the Department 

committed a ministerial error by failing 

to correct certain incorrectly reported 

movement expenses, the Department 

disagrees. 

While the Department corrected 

several database reporting errors 

committed by New Zhongya and the 

Guang Ya Group for purposes of the 

Preliminary Determination,2 the 

Department was not able to identify all 

of their errors, nor should it be expected 

to. It is the responsibility of respondents 

to provide complete and accurate 

information and data to the Department; 

however, in this case, the errors in 

question are reporting errors made by 

the respondent, not ministerial errors 

made by the Department. Accordingly, 

the Department finds that New Zhongya 

and the Guang Ya Group’s database 

reporting errors relating to certain 

movement expenses do not constitute 

ministerial errors by the Department 

pursuant to section 735(e) of the Act, 

and thus has not corrected respondents’ 

reporting errors for this amended 

preliminary determination. 

With respect to New Zhongya’s 

assertion that the Department 

committed a ministerial error by failing 

to correct Guang Ya Group/New 

Zhongya’s database reporting error for 

the ‘‘packing-paper’’ consumption factor 

of production (‘‘FOP’’), the Department 

also disagrees. Specifically, Guang Ya 

Group/New Zhongya erred in reporting 

its consumption of ‘‘packing-paper’’ in 

the consolidated FOP databases by 

inadvertently failing to convert the 

reporting basis from kilograms per 

metric ton to kilograms per kilogram, 

but indicating in the database that it had 

made this conversion which resulted in 

applying inconsistent units of measure 

for the consumption of the ‘‘packingpaper’’ input. While Guang Ya Group/ 

New Zhongya neglected to convert the 

units of measure relating to ‘‘packingpaper,’’ it did correctly convert, and 

report, the units of measure for other 

factors of production when 

consolidating their FOP databases. 

Therefore, the Department finds that 

this constitutes a reporting error by 

respondent, not a ministerial error by 

the Department pursuant to section 

735(e) of the Act, and thus has not 

corrected respondents’ reporting error 

for this amended preliminary 

determination. 

Additional Ministerial Error 

Additionally, in reviewing the 

antidumping duty margin calculations 

in light of the ministerial error 

allegations raised by parties in this 

investigation, the Department has 

identified an error committed by the 

Department regarding the calculation of 

the surrogate value for labor that 

constitutes a ministerial error pursuant 

to section 735(e) of the Act. 

In applying the procedures discussed 

in the Factors of Production 

memorandum issued concurrently with 

the Preliminary Determination, the 

Department erred in identifying the 

significant producers of comparable 

merchandise. The Department 

committed a ministerial error when 

downloading the Global Trade Atlas 

(‘‘GTA’’) export data by inadvertently (1) 

selecting data from years 2008 through 

2010, and (2) limiting the data to 

exports from January to August, which 

resulted in an incomplete and 

inapplicable dataset because the export 

list (e.g., 2010) post-dates the instant 

POI. In identifying whether a country is 

a significant producer of comparable 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
326 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 2 / Tuesday, January 4, 2011 / Notices 

3See Dorbest Ltd. v. United States, 604 F.3d 1363, 

1372 (CAFC 2010) (‘‘Dorbest IV’’). 

4See Id. See also December 21, 2010, Ministerial 

Error Memorandum, Aluminum Extrusions from 

the People’s Republic of China, Preliminary 

Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, at 

Issue 4; and December 21, 2010, Memorandum to 

the File, regarding Investigation of Certain 

Aluminum Extrusions from the People’s Republic 

of China: Petition Rate recalculation. 

5See December 10, 2010, Memorandum to the 

File, regarding Investigation of Certain Aluminum 

Extrusions from the People’s Republic of China: 

Petition Rate recalculation. 

6See ‘‘Statement of Administrative Action’’ 

accompanying the URAA, H.R. Rep. No. 103–316, 

vol. 1, at 870 (1994) (‘‘SAA’’). 

7See Tapered Roller Bearings and Parts Thereof, 

Finished and Unfinished, From Japan, and Tapered 

Roller Bearings, Four Inches or Less in Outside 

Diameter, and Components Thereof, From Japan; 

Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Reviews and Partial Termination of 

Administrative Reviews, 61 FR 57391, 57392 

(November 6, 1996), and unchanged in Tapered 

Roller Bearings and Parts Thereof, Finished and 

Unfinished, From Japan; and Tapered Roller 

Bearings, Four Inches or Less in Outside Diameter, 

and Components Thereof, From Japan; Final 

Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Reviews and Termination in Part, 62 FR 11825 

(March 13, 1997). 

merchandise, it is the Department’s 

practice to rely on annualized GTA 

export data based on the three years 

leading up to the end of the relevant 

POI, (in this case that should be 2007 

through 2009). 

Therefore, for this amended 

preliminary determination, the 

Department has corrected the 

ministerial error and recalculated the 

surrogate labor rate. For the revised 

labor rate calculation, see Investigation 

of Certain Aluminum Extrusions from 

the People’s Republic of China: Petition 

Rate recalculation, at Attachment I. For 

further discussion of the ministerial 

error allegations and the Department’s 

positions, see the ‘‘Ministerial Error 

Memorandum, Aluminum Extrusions 

from the People’s Republic of China, 

Preliminary Determination of Sales at 

Less Than Fair Value,’’ dated December 

21, 2010; see also Appendix I for a list 

of the ministerial error allegations. 

Recalculated Initiation Margins 

As a result of correcting the 

ministerial errors discussed above, the 

Department has revised the overall 

antidumping duty rate for the 

mandatory respondent to a rate that falls 

below the initiation margins. While the 

Department normally does not 

recalculate the petition rates, the 

initiation margins were calculated using 

the Department’s regression analysis as 

a basis for the labor surrogate value, and 

the regulation regarding that analysis 

was invalidated by the Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit in Dorbest IV.3

Therefore, in light of the Federal Circuit 

decision, the Department has adjusted 

the Petition rates using the revised 

surrogate value for labor discussed 

above, resulting in adjusted Petition 

rates ranging from 32.44 to 33.18 

percent.4

Corroboration 

As a result of correcting the 

ministerial errors discussed above, and 

the subsequent revision of the 

antidumping duty rate for the 

mandatory respondent to a rate below 

the adjusted initiation margin, the 

Department has determined to use the 

highest adjusted petition rate when 

applying adverse facts available 

(‘‘AFA’’).5 Section 776(c) of the Act 

provides that, when the Department 

relies on secondary information rather 

than on information obtained in the 

course of an investigation as FA, it 

must, to the extent practicable, 

corroborate that information from 

independent sources reasonably at its 

disposal. Secondary information is 

described as ‘‘information derived from 

the petition that gave rise to the 

investigation or review, the final 

determination concerning the subject 

merchandise, or any previous review 

under section 751 concerning the 

merchandise subject to this 

investigation.’’ 6 To ‘‘corroborate’’ means 

that the Department will satisfy itself 

that the secondary information to be 

used has probative value. Independent 

sources used to corroborate may 

include, for example, published price 

lists, official import statistics and 

customs data, and information obtained 

from interested parties during the 

particular investigation. To corroborate 

secondary information, the Department 

will, to the extent practicable, examine 

the reliability and relevance of the 

information used.7

To corroborate the AFA margin that 

we have selected, we compared this 

margin to the transaction-specific 

margins we found for the cooperating 

mandatory respondents. We found that 

the margin of 33.18 percent has 

probative value because it is in the 

range of the transaction-specific margins 

that we found for Guang Ya Group/New 

Zhongya/Xinya during the period of 

investigation. See Amended Preliminary 

Determination Analysis Memorandum 

dated concurrently with this notice. 

Accordingly, we find this rate is reliable 

and relevant, considering the record 

information, and thus, has probative 

value. See Amended Preliminary 

Determination Analysis Memorandum 

dated concurrently with this notice. 

Given that numerous PRC-wide 

entities did not respond to the 

Department’s requests for information in 

this investigation, the Department 

concludes that the updated petition rate 

of 33.18 percent, as total AFA for the 

PRC-wide entity, is sufficiently adverse 

to prevent these respondents from 

benefitting from their lack of 

cooperation. See SAA at 870. 

Accordingly, we find that the rate of 

33.18 percent is corroborated to the 

extent practicable within the meaning of 

section 776(c) of the Act. 

Consequently, we are applying 33.18 

percent as the single antidumping rate 

to the PRC-wide entity. The PRC-wide 

rate applies to all entries of the 

merchandise under investigation except 

for entries from Guang Ya Group/New 

Zhongya/Xinya and the separate rate 

applicants, listed below, receiving a 

separate rate. 

Amended Preliminary Determination 

We are publishing this amended 

preliminary determination pursuant to 

19 CFR 351.224(e). As a result of this 

amended preliminary determination, we 

have revised the antidumping rate for 

Guang Ya Group/New Zhongya/Xinya. 

In addition, we have revised the 

separate rate based on Guang Ya Group/ 

New Zhongya/Xinya’s revised dumping 

margin. Because Guang Ya Group/New 

Zhongya/Xinya’s revised dumping 

margin is lower than the Petition rate, 

we have also revised the PRC-wide 

entity rate. The margin for the 

companies granted separate-rate status 

must also be revised because the margin 

for those companies was derived from 

the Guang Ya Group/New Zhongya/ 

Xinya margin. 

As a result of our correction of 

significant ministerial errors in the 

Preliminary Determination, we have 

determined that the following weightedaverage dumping margins apply: 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 2 / Tuesday, January 4, 2011 / Notices 327 

Exporter Producer 

Weightedaverage 

margin 

Guang Ya Aluminium Industries Co., Ltd; Foshan Guangcheng 

Aluminium Co., Ltd; Kong Ah International Company Limited; 

Guang Ya Aluminium Industries (Hong Kong) Limited; 

Zhaoqing New Zhongya Aluminum Co., Ltd; Zhongya 

Shaped Aluminium (HK) Holding Limited; Karlton Aluminum 

Company Ltd; Xinya Aluminum & Stainless Steel Product 

Co., Ltd (A.K.A. New Asia Aluminum & Stainless Steel Product Co., Ltd).

Guang Ya Aluminium Industries Co., Ltd; Foshan 

Guangcheng Aluminium Co., Ltd; Kong Ah International 

Company Limited; Guang Ya Aluminium Industries (Hong 

Kong) Limited; Zhaoqing New Zhongya Aluminum Co., Ltd; 

Zhongya Shaped Aluminium (HK) Holding Limited; Karlton 

Aluminum Company Ltd; Xinya Aluminum & Stainless Steel 

Product Co., Ltd (A.K.A. New Asia Aluminum & Stainless 

Steel Product Co., Ltd).

32.04 

Alnan Aluminium Co., Ltd ........................................................... Alnan Aluminium Co., Ltd .......................................................... 32.04 

Changshu Changsheng Aluminium Products Co., Ltd ............... Changshu Changsheng Aluminium Products Co., Ltd .............. 32.04 

China Square Industrial Limited ................................................. Zhaoqing China Square Industry Limited .................................. 32.04 

Cosco (J.M) Aluminium Co., Ltd ................................................. Cosco (J.M) Aluminium Co., Ltd; Jiangmen Qunxing Hardware 

Diecasting Co., Ltd.

32.04 

First Union Property Limited ....................................................... Top-Wok Metal Co., Ltd ............................................................. 32.04 

Foshan Jinlan Non-ferrous Metal Product Co.; Ltd .................... Foshan Jinlan Aluminium Co.; Ltd ............................................. 32.04 

Foshan Sanshui Fenglu Aluminium Co., Ltd .............................. Foshan Sanshui Fenglu Aluminium Co., Ltd ............................. 32.04 

Guangdong Hao Mei Aluminium Co., Ltd ................................... Guangdong Hao Mei Aluminium Co., Ltd .................................. 32.04 

Guangdong Weiye Aluminium Factory Co., Ltd ......................... Guangdong Weiye Aluminium Factory Co., Ltd ........................ 32.04 

Guangdong Xingfa Aluminium Co., Ltd ...................................... Guangdong Xingfa Aluminium Co., Ltd ..................................... 32.04 

Hanwood Enterprises Limited ..................................................... Pingguo Aluminium Company Limited ....................................... 32.04 

Honsense Development Company ............................................. Kanal Precision Aluminium Product Co., Ltd ............................ 32.04 

Innovative Aluminium (Hong Kong) Limited ............................... Taishan Golden Gain Aluminium Products Limited ................... 32.04 

Jiangyin Trust International Inc ................................................... Jiangyin Xinhong Doors and Windows Co., Ltd ........................ 32.04 

JMA (HK) Company Limited ....................................................... Guangdong Jianmei Aluminum Profile Company Limited; 

Foshan JMA Aluminium Company Limited.

32.04 

Kam Kiu Aluminium Products Sdn Bhd ...................................... Tai Shan City Kam Kiu Aluminium Extrusion Co., Ltd .............. 32.04 

Longkou Donghai Trade Co., Ltd ............................................... Shandong Nanshan Aluminum Co., Ltd .................................... 32.04 

Ningbo Yili Import and Export Co., Ltd ....................................... Zhejiang Anji Xinxiang Aluminum Co., Ltd ................................ 32.04 

North China Aluminum Co., Ltd .................................................. North China Aluminum Co., Ltd ................................................. 32.04 

PanAsia Aluminium (China) Limited ........................................... PanAsia Aluminium (China) Limited .......................................... 32.04 

Pingguo Asia Aluminum Co., Ltd ................................................ Pingguo Asia Aluminum Co., Ltd ............................................... 32.04 

Popular Plastics Co., Ltd ............................................................ Hoi Tat Plastic Mould & Metal Factory ...................................... 32.04 

Press Metal International Ltd ...................................................... Press Metal International Ltd ..................................................... 32.04 

Shenyang Yuanda Aluminium Industry Engineering Co. Ltd ..... Zhaoqing Asia Aluminum Factory Company Limited; Guang 

Ya Aluminum Industries Co., Ltd.

32.04 

Tai-Ao Aluminium (Taishan) Co., Ltd ......................................... Tai-Ao Aluminium (Taishan) Co., Ltd ........................................ 32.04 

Tianjin Ruixin Electric Heat Transmission Technology Co., Ltd Tianjin Ruixin Electric Heat Transmission Technology Co., Ltd 32.04 

USA Worldwide Door Components (Pinghu) Co., Ltd; Worldwide Door Components (Pinghu) Co.USA Worldwide Door Components (Pinghu) Co., Ltd .............. 32.04 

Zhejiang Yongkang Listar Aluminium Industry Co., Ltd ............. Zhejiang Yongkang Listar Aluminium Industry Co., Ltd ............ 32.04 

Zhongshan Gold Mountain Aluminium Factory Ltd .................... Zhongshan Gold Mountain Aluminium Factory Ltd ................... 32.04 

PRC-wide Entity .......................................................................... .................................................................................................... 33.18 

The collection of bonds or cash 

deposits and suspension of liquidation 

will be revised accordingly and parties 

will be notified of this determination, in 

accordance with section 733(d) and (f) 

of the Act. 

International Trade Commission 

Notification 

In accordance with section 733(f) of 

the Act, we have notified the 

International Trade Commission (‘‘ITC’’) 

of our amended preliminary 

determination. If our final 

determination is affirmative, the ITC 

will determine before the later of 120 

days after the date of the preliminary 

determination or 45 days after our final 

determination whether the domestic 

industry in the United States is 

materially injured, or threatened with 

material injury, by reason of imports, or 

sales (or the likelihood of sales) for 

importation, of the subject merchandise. 

This determination is issued and 

published in accordance with sections 

733(f) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 

CFR 351.224(e). 

Dated: December 21, 2010. 

Christian Marsh, 

Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import 

Administration. 

Appendix I 

Issue 1: Whether the Department used 

an incorrect indirect selling expense 

ratio in the SAS programming (Guang 

Ya Group) 

Issue 2: Whether the Department should 

correct errors made by New Zhongya 

with respect to its reported 

USINSURU and INSURU expenses 

Issue 3: Whether the Department used 

the correct surrogate value for packing 

paper (PAPER1) 

Issue 4: Recalculation of the surrogate 

value for labor 

[FR Doc. 2010–32867 Filed 1–3–11; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–427–801] 

Ball Bearings and Parts Thereof From 

France: Partial Rescission of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review 

AGENCY: Import Administration, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: In response to requests from 

interested parties, the Department of 

Commerce (the Department) initiated an 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on ball bearings 


jlentini on DSKJ8SOYB1PROD with NOTICES