alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
32.1
 CERTIFICATION
OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S. C. SECTION
1350
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the Annual Report of SigmaBroadband Co., (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2016 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), I, Jeffery A. Brown, President and Principal
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S. C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:
 
 (1)  The Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 (2)  The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
 
 
 SIGMABROADBAND
CO.May 5,
2017
By:
/s/ 
Jeffery A.
BrownJeffery
A. BrownPresident,
Secretary, Principal Executive Officer, and Director
H. Res. 892

In the House of Representatives, U.S., 

July 24, 2006.

Whereas the Michoud Assembly Facility plays a vital role in 

the United States manned space flight program, including production of the Shuttle External Tank, a vital component of the Shuttle program; 

Whereas the 38 members of the ‘‘Michoud Hurricane RideOut Team’’ who stayed behind during Hurricane Katrina 

risked their lives in dedication to the space program and 

faced down one of the greatest natural disasters in this 

Nation’s history, at great personal risk; and 

Whereas, if not for the dedication of this team, the Michoud 

facility would have suffered a great loss of National Aeronautics and Space Administration assets and technology, 

which would have severely limited the National Aeronautics and Space Administration’s mission: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives commends 

the dedication of the 38 members of the ‘‘Michoud Hurricane 

Ride-Out Team’’ who stayed behind at the National Aeronautics and Space Administration’s Michoud Assembly Facility and protected vital program assets, which enabled the facility to resume production of the Shuttle External Tank 
2

•HRES 892 EH 

within 5 weeks of Hurricane Katrina’s landfall, including 

Ronald L. Adams, Jr. of New Orleans, LA, Joseph Charles 

Barrett of Metairie, LA, Donald K. Bollich of Metairie, LA, 

Frederick H. Castle of Bay Saint Louis, MS, Daniel Alvine 

Doell of Terrytown, LA, John Lee Fisher of Slidell, LA, 

James E. Ford II of Madisonville, LA, Stephen Lynn Francis 

of New Orleans, LA, Monroe Lewis Frazier Jr. of Harvey, 

LA, Ernest Graham of Picayune, MS, William Carl Hale III 

of Slidell, LA, Willie Frederick Henderson III of New Orleans, LA, Simmie Paul Herrin of Slidell, LA, Royal Kenneth 

Holland of New Orleans, LA, Guy Mitchell Jackson of 

Chalmette, LA, Ivory Jordan, Jr. of Lacombe, LA, Joe E. 

Kennedy of Pearl River, LA, Donald P. Leon Jr. of New Orleans, LA, Michael Wilson Moore of Metairie, LA, Daryl 

Ordes of Pearlington, MS, Michael A. Parquet of Slidell, LA, 

John Melvin Pucheu of Waveland, MS, George Elson Rogers, 

Sr. of Kenner, LA, Steven L. Roshto Jr. of Slidell, LA, Alan 

J. Rovira of New Orleans, LA, Joan B. Savoy of Saint Bernard, LA, Vickie Ann Schmersahl of Slidell, LA, Patrick 

Shawn Shea of Mandeville, LA, Henry Peter Sissac Jr. of 

New Orleans, LA, Aline H. Sullwold of Picayune, MS, Steve 

Thompson of Huntsville, AL, Richard Leowen Treat of Picayune, MS, Stephen Avery Turner of Slidell, LA, Byran Dale 

Walker of Picayune, MS, Edward Perry Watts Jr. of 

Metairie, LA, Roland C. Williams of New Orleans, LA, Terry 
3

•HRES 892 EH 

Michael Winchester of Slidell, LA, and Malcolm Wayne Wood 

of Picayune, MS. 

Attest:

Clerk.
Exhibit 32.1

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

         In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of
Velocity Asset Management Inc. for the nine months ended September 30, 2006, I,
John C. Kleinert, Chief Executive Officer of Velocity Asset Management, Inc.
hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

                  (1) such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the nine months
ended September 30, 2006, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

                  (2) the information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form
10-QSB for the nine months ended September 30, 2006, fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Velocity
Asset Management, Inc.

                                             /s/ JOHN C. KLEINERT
                                             ---------------------------
                                             John C. Kleinert
                                             Chief Executive Officer


         November 15, 2006

                                       31
H. Res. 766

In the House of Representatives, U.S., 

April 6, 2006.

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule 

XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the 

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of 

the concurrent resolution (H. Con. Res. 376) establishing the 

congressional budget for the United States Government for 

fiscal year 2007 and setting forth appropriate budgetary levels for fiscal years 2008 through 2011. The first reading of 

the concurrent resolution shall be dispensed with. All points 

of order against consideration of the concurrent resolution 

are waived. General debate shall not exceed four hours, with 

three hours of general debate confined to the congressional 

budget equally divided and controlled by the chairman and 

ranking minority member of the Committee on the Budget 

and one hour of general debate on the subject of economic 

goals and policies equally divided and controlled by Representative Saxton of New Jersey and Representative 

Maloney of New York or their designees. After general debate 
2

•HRES 766 EH 

the Committee of the Whole shall rise without motion. No 

further consideration of the concurrent resolution shall be in 

order except pursuant to a subsequent order of the House.

Attest: 

Clerk.
#### § 1326.30 What policies and procedures must I follow?

The Department of Commerce policies and procedures that you must follow are the policies and procedures specified in each applicable section of the OMB guidance in subparts A through I of 2 CFR part 180, as that section is supplemented by the section in this part with the same section number. The contracts that are covered transactions, for example, are specified by section 220 of the OMB guidance (*i.e.*, 2 CFR 180.220) as supplemented by section 220 in this part (*i.e.*, § 1326.220). For any section of OMB guidance in subparts A through I of 2 CFR 180 that has no corresponding section in this part, Department of Commerce policies and procedures are those in the OMB guidance.
IV 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 465 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that regular order 

should be restored in the House and Senate. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 20, 2017 

Mr. NOLAN submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Rules 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that 

regular order should be restored in the House and Senate. 

1 Resolved, 

2 SECTION 1. REQUIRING REGULAR ORDER IN THE HOUSE 

3 AND SENATE. 

4 It is the sense of the House of Representatives that— 

5 (1) it should not be in order to consider a bill 

6 or resolution in the House unless each committee to 

7 which the bill or resolution is referred— 

8 (A) had a hearing on the bill or resolution 

9 at which amendments were permitted to be ofVerDate Sep 11 2014 21:53 Jul 21, 2017 Jkt 069200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\HR465.IH HR465

asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 465 IH 

1 fered and debated and a vote was taken on each 

2 amendment offered and on final passage; and 

3 (B) filed a report with respect to the bill 

4 or resolution; 

5 (2) a conference report should not be filed in 

6 the House unless— 

7 (A) the conference committee held at least 

8 3 meetings in which all members of the con9 ference committee were allowed to be present; 

10 (B) all items of difference between the 

11 House and Senate were addressed, voted on, 

12 and resolved by the full conference committee 

13 membership; and 

14 (C) printed or electronic copies of the con15 ference report and the accompanying joint ex16 planatory statement were available to Members 

17 and Delegates for at least 48 hours prior to fil18 ing; 

19 (3) the House and Senate should schedule si20 multaneous 5-day work weeks in Washington and 

21 district work periods; and 

22 (4) every bill brought to committee should be 

23 open to amendment and every bill brought to the 


asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 465 IH 

1 floor of the House for a vote should be considered 

2 under an open rule. 

Æ 


asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Reclamation

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Reclamation, Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice of change.

# SUMMARY:

The Water Resources Planning Act of 1965 and the Water Resources Development Act of 1974 require an annual determination of a discount rate for Federal water resources planning. The discount rate for Federal water resources planning for fiscal year 2011 is 4.125 percent. Discounting is to be used to convert future monetary values to present values.

# DATES:

This discount rate is to be used for the period October 1, 2010, through and including September 30, 2011.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Brooke Miller-Levy, Water and Environmental Resources Division, Denver, Colorado 80225; telephone: 303-445-2889.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Notice is hereby given that the interest rate to be used by Federal agencies in the formulation and evaluation of plans for water and related land resources is 4.125 percent for fiscal year 2011.

This rate has been computed in accordance with Section 80(a), Public Law 93-251 (88 Stat. 34) and 18 CFR 704.39, which: (1) specify that the rate will be based upon the average yield during the preceding fiscal year on interest-bearing marketable securities of the United States which, at the time the computation is made, have terms of 15 years or more remaining to maturity (average yield is rounded to nearest one-eighth percent); and (2) provide that the rate will not be raised or lowered more than one-quarter of 1 percent for any year. The U.S. Department of the Treasury calculated the specified average to be 4.1620 percent. This average value is then rounded to the nearest one-eighth of a point, resulting in 4.125 percent.

The rate of 4.125 percent will be used by all Federal agencies in the formulation and evaluation of water and related land resources plans for the purpose of discounting future benefits and computing costs or otherwise converting benefits and costs to a common-time basis.

Dated: December 3, 2010.

Roseann Gonzales,

Director, Policy and Administration, Denver Office.

[FR Doc. 2010-32801 Filed 12-28-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-MN-P
#### DEMAREST v. CARR.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

December 24, 1914.)

Action by Horace A. Demarest against Frank A. Carr.

No opinion. Motion denied, with $10 costs. Order filed. See, also, 150 N. Y. Supp. 1082.
§ 905.50 Resource acquisition principles. Western's resource acquisition activities will be determined by project-specific power marketing plans, hydropower production capability, and the application of the following principles of IRP: ( a ) Western will consider a full range of resource options, both supply-side and demand-side, as well as renewable resource options.
( b ) On a project-by-project basis, Western, through a public process involving interested stakeholders will develop criteria to be used in evaluating power resource alternatives.
( c ) Evaluation criteria will address cost, environmental impact, dependability, dispatchability, risk, diversity, and the ability to verify demand-side alternatives. Evaluation criteria will be reviewed as the need for resources changes or when long-term commitments to purchase power expire.
( d ) Evaluation criteria will be consistent with Western's power marketing policy, which states that Federal power is to be marketed in such a manner as to encourage the most widespread use thereof at the lowest possible rates to consumers consistent with sound business principles. The policy, found in Delegation Order No. 00-037.00A, is derived from statutes authorizing the sale of power from both Department of the Army and Department of the Interior hydroelectric projects. These statutes include section 5 of the Flood Control Act of 1944, 16 U.S.C. 825(s) and section 9(c) of the Reclamation Project Act of 1939.
( e ) Resource acquisition planning will be consistent with power marketing plans and associated contractual obligations.
( f ) Resource acquisition decisions will be documented and made available to Western's power customers and the public.
Exhibit 32.1

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

         In connection with the accompanying amended Quarterly Report on Form
10-QSB of Velocity Asset Management Inc. for the three months ended September
30, 2005, I, John C. Kleinert, Chief Executive Officer of Velocity Asset
Management, Inc. hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

                  (1) such amended Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the three
months ended September 30, 2005, fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

                  (2) the information contained in such amended Quarterly Report
on Form 10-QSB for the three months ended September 30, 2005, fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Velocity Asset Management, Inc.

                                               /s/ JOHN C. KLEINERT
                                               --------------------------------
                                               John C. Kleinert
                                               Chief Executive Officer


         November 14, 2005

                                       28
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 70 (Monday, April 13, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 19648]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-08532]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ELECTION ASSISTANCE COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Notice

AGENCY: U.S. Election Assistance Commission.

ACTION: Notice of Public Meeting for EAC Standards Board.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DATE & TIME:  Tuesday, April 28, 2015, 9:00 a.m.-5:00 p.m. and 
Wednesday, April 29, 2015, 9:00 a.m.-2:00 p.m.

PLACE:  The Williamsburg Woodlands Hotel, 105 Visitor Center Drive, 
Williamsburg, VA 23185, Phone: (757) 220-7960.

PURPOSE:  The U.S. Election Assistance Commission (EAC) Standards 
Board, as required by the Help America Vote Act of 2002, will meet to 
organize and select an executive board following a suspension of 
activity. The Standards Board will present its views on issues in the 
administration of Federal elections, formulate recommendations to the 
EAC, and receive updates on EAC program activities. The Board will 
designate a Bylaws Committee, an EAC Executive Director Search 
Committee, and a Voting Systems Standards Committee. The Board will 
receive a briefing on the EAC Grants program. The Board will receive a 
briefing on the EAC Testing & Certification program with updates on the 
Voluntary Voting System Guidelines (VVSG 1.1). The Board will receive a 
briefing on the EAC Research Program. The Board will receive a briefing 
by the National Association of State Election Directors (NASED) Voting 
Systems Committee. The Board will receive a briefing on Disability 
Grants. The Board will receive a briefing by the Federal Voting 
Assistance Program (FVAP). The Board will receive a briefing on the 
activities of the EAC's Technical Guidelines Development Committee 
(TGDC). The Board will receive a status report on a State Testing & 
Certification Consortium. The Board will hear committee reports and 
consider other administrative matters.

This Meeting Will Be Open to the Public

PERSON TO CONTACT FOR INFORMATION: Bryan Whitener, Telephone: (301) 
563-3961.

Bryan Whitener,
Director of Communications and Clearinghouse, U.S. Election Assistance 
Commission.
[FR Doc. 2015-08532 Filed 4-9-15; 4:15 pm]
 BILLING CODE 6820-KF-P
```
§ 81.40 Contents of a license application. ( a ) *Nonexclusive license application.* An application for a nonexclusive license under an NRC invention should be accompanied by a fee of ten dollars ($10) for processing the application and must include the following information: ( 1 ) Identification of the invention for which the license is desired, including the patent application serial number or the patent number, title, and date, if known, and any other identification of the invention;
( 2 ) Name and address of the person, company, or organization applying for a license and the citizenship or State of incorporation thereof;
( 3 ) Name and address of a representative of applicant to whom correspondence should be sent and any notices served;
( 4 ) Nature and type of applicant's business;
( 5 ) Identification of the source of applicant's information concerning the availability of a license on the invention;
( 6 ) Purpose for which the license is desired, and a brief description of applicant's plan to achieve that purpose;
( 7 ) A statement of the field and the field(s) of use in which applicant intends to practice the invention; and
( 8 ) A statement of the geographical area(s) in which the applicant will practice the invention.
( b ) *Exclusive license application.* An application for a limited exclusive license should include, in addition to the information indicated above for a nonexclusive license application, the following information: ( 1 ) Applicant's status, if any, in any one or more of the following categories: ( i ) Small business firm;
( ii ) Minority business enterprise;
( iii ) Location in a surplus labor area;
( iv ) Location in a low income area; and
( v ) Location in an economically depressed area.
( 2 ) A statement describing the time, expenditure, and other acts which the applicant considers necessary to bring the invention to a point of practical application, and the applicant's offer to invest that time and sum, and to perform such acts, if the license is granted.
( 3 ) A statement of applicant's capability to undertake the development and/or marketing required to bring the invention to the point of practical application.
( 4 ) A statement that contains applicant's best knowledge of the extent to which the invention is being practiced by private industry and the Government; and
( 5 ) Any other facts which the applicant believes to show it to be in the public interest for the Commission to grant an exclusive license rather than a nonexclusive license and that such exclusive license should be granted to the applicant.
#### § 2520.30 What policies and procedures must I follow?

The NSF policies and procedures that you must follow are the policies and procedures specified in each applicable section of the OMB guidance in subparts A through I of 2 CFR part 180, as that section is supplemented by the section in this part with the same section number. The contracts that are covered transactions, for example, are specified by section 220 of the OMB guidance (i.e., 2 CFR 180.220) as supplemented by section 220 in this part (i.e., § 2520.220). For any section of OMB guidance in subparts A through I of 2 CFR 180 that has no corresponding section in this part, NSF policies and procedures are those in the OMB guidance.
#### § 2998.220 What contracts and subcontracts, in addition to those listed in 2 CFR 180.220, are covered transactions?

In addition to the contracts covered under 2 CFR 180.220(b) of the OMB guidance, this part applies to any contract, regardless of tier, that is awarded by a contractor, subcontractor, supplier, consultant, or its agent or representative in any transaction, if the contract is to be funded or provided by the Department of Labor under a covered non-procurement transaction. This extends the coverage of the Department of Labor non-procurement suspension and debarment requirements to all lower tiers of subcontracts under covered non-procurement transactions, as permitted under the OMB guidance at 2 CFR 180.220(c) (see optional lower tier coverage in the figure in the appendix to 2 CFR part 180).
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-16-00273-CV 

IN RE MACK BENNETT RELATOR

------------

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

TRIAL COURT NO. 342-268831-13

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

------------

We have considered “Relator’s Amended Motion to Dismiss Petition for 

Writ of Mandamus as Moot.” It is the court’s opinion that the motion should be 

granted; therefore, we dismiss this original proceeding. 

/s/ Bonnie Sudderth

BONNIE SUDDERTH

JUSTICE

PANEL: LIVINGSTON, C.J.; GABRIEL and SUDDERTH, JJ. 

DELIVERED: August 19, 2016

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.