alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**AIMD-21.3.2**                      Published: May 01, 2000. Publicly Released: May 01, 2000.                  

-   
-   
-   
-   

    Jump To:  
-  Elder Abuse 
-  Services for Older Adults 
-  State and Local-Level Drivers and Trends 
-  State and Local Fiscal Projections 
-  Federal Borrowing 
-  Managing the Debt 
-  Summary of Funding Provisions 
-  Auditing the Government's Books 
-  Unpacking the Financial Report 
-  Highlights 
-  Recommendations 
-  Background 
-  About This Work 
-  About This Work 
-  Trends 
-  About the Center 
-  Why It's High Risk 
-  What Remains To Be Done 
-  Key Reports 
-  Newest COVID-Related Reports 
-  AI Use Cases 
-  Flood Insurance 
-  Past Pandemic-Related Reports 
-  CARES Act Oversight Reports 
-  All COVID-19 Reports 
-  Report Suspected Fraud 
-  Subjects 
-  How to Get Notified 
-  Past Reports 
-  Public Health Threats 
-  Explore the FY 2022 and 2023 Funds 
-  Status of FY22 Projects 
-  Lessons Learned 
-  Agency Reports 
-  Recent Reports 
-  Recommendations 
-  Supplemental Material 
-  Full Report 
-  Additional Data 
-  View Decision 
-  Downloads 
-  Previously Identified Actions 
-  Related Pages 
-  Associated Agencies 
-  Tough Choices and Opportunities Ahead 
-  Americas Fiscal Future Key Areas 
-  Retirement Security Key Areas 
-  Current List 
-  About The High Risk List 
-  Area Ratings 
-  Previous High Risk Products 
-  Search Federal Vacancies 
-  Past Federal Vacancies 
-  Violation Letters 
-  About the Yellow Book 
-  Advisory Council 
-  Related Resources 
-  Comment Letters 
-  Related Publications 
-  Contacts and Resources 
-  Major Issues Facing the Nation 
-  Meeting Strategic Challenges 
-  Additional Resources 
-  Resources 
-  GAO Contacts 
-  Mission Teams 
-  Operations and Staff Offices  
-  Organization Chart  
-  Why a Career at GAO? 
-  Am I Qualified? 
-  Company Culture 
-  Reasonable Accommodations 
-  Video Gallery 
-  Paid Internships 
-  Student Volunteers 
-  Professional Development Program 
-  Advancement 
-  Executive Candidate Program 
-  Summer Associates 
-  Externships 
-  Benefits 
-  Contacts 

Skip to Highlights

## Highlights

GAO published a guide to assist agencies in maintaining effective internal control while streamlining the operations of their payment systems and reducing costs.

## Full Report

Full Report (36 pages)

## Office of Public Affairs

### Media Inquiries

Sarah Kaczmarek
kaczmareks@gao.gov

(202) 512-4800

### Public Inquiries

Public Affairs
PublicAffairs@gao.gov

(202) 512-4800

## Topics

Auditing and Financial Management

Contractor paymentsCost controlFinancial management systemsInternal controlsStrategic information systems planningSystems designPayment systemsElectronic signaturesFinancial managementPrompt payment
#### § 1400.1014 Respondent.

Respondent means a person who is the subject of a DOI suspension or proposed debarment action.

[81 FR 65857, Sept. 26, 2016]
§ 3000.20 Does this part apply to me? This part and, through this part, pertinent portions of the OMB guidance in Subparts A through I of 2 CFR part 180 (see table at 2 CFR 180.100(b)) apply to you if you are a— ( a ) Participant or principal in a “covered transaction” (see Subpart B of 2 CFR Part 180 and the definition of “nonprocurement transaction” at 2 CFR 180.970);
( b ) Respondent in a Department of Homeland Security suspension or debarment action;
( c ) Department of Homeland Security debarment or suspension official;
( d ) Department of Homeland Security grants officer, agreements officer, or other official authorized to enter into any type of nonprocurement transaction that is a covered transaction.
§ 910.370 Novation of financial assistance agreements. ( a ) Financial assistance agreements are not assignable absent written consent from the contracting officer. At his or her sole discretion, the contracting officer may, through novation, recognize a third party as the successor in interest to a financial assistance agreement if such recognition is in the Government's interest, conforms with all applicable laws and the third party's interest in the agreement arises out of the transfer of: ( 1 ) All of the recipient's assets; or
( 2 ) The entire portion of the assets necessary to perform the project described in the agreement.
( b ) When the contracting officer determines that it is not in the Government's interest to consent to the novation of a financial assistance agreement from the original recipient to a third party, the original recipient remains subject to the terms of the financial assistance agreement, and the Department may exercise all legally available remedies under 2 CFR 200.339 through 200.343, or that may be otherwise available, should the original recipient not perform.
( c ) The contracting officer may require submission of any documentation in support of a request for novation, including but not limited to documents identified in 48 CFR Subpart 42.12. The contracting officer may use the format in 48 CFR 42.1204 as guidance for novation agreements identified in paragraph (a) of this section.
[80 FR 53239, Sept. 3, 2015, as amended at 87 FR 15320, Mar. 18, 2022]
From: "Achanta, Chandana L." <Chandana_L._Achanta@omb.eop.gov>

To: William Charmley/AA/USEPA/US@EPA, "'Neil.Eisner@dot.gov'" <Neil.Eisner@dot.gov>, "'Steve.Wood@dot.gov'" <Steve.Wood@dot.gov>, Robin Moran/AA/USEPA/US@EPA,

"'james.tamm@dot.gov'" < james.tamm@dot.gov>, "'rebecca.yoon@dot.gov'" <rebecca.yoon@dot.gov>, "'Joanne.Petrie@dot.gov'" <Joanne.Petrie@dot.gov>

Date: 11/30/2010 03:02 PM

Subject: Summary of interagency working comments on draft NOI under EO 12866 review

Please find attached a summary of interagency working comments received on the draft supplemental

NOI currently under EO 12866 review. They are for your consideration and subject to further policy

review.

Thanks.Summary of Interagency Working Comments on Draft Supplemental Notice of Intent under EO 12866

Review

Below is a summary of interagency working comments received during interagency review of the draft

Supplemental Notice of Intent under EO 12866. They are for your consideration and subject to further

policy review.

1) Interagency commenter recommends that the agencies add language similar to the following in

Section III:

“In his May 21, 2010 Memorandum, the President highlighted the opportunity for the U.S. to lead the

world in developing a new generation of clean cars and trucks, to spur economic growth and to create

high

‐ quality jobs. In developing the proposal, the agencies will continue to gather input from

stakeholders, including the OEMs and labor unions, on the potential impacts of standards on jobs and

the automotive sector in order to maximize the opportunities for economic growth.”

2) Interagency commenter also requests the following revision to the sentence in the

supplemental notice:

“EPA and NHTSA intend to continue working with the California Air Resources Board in

developing the underlying technical assessments that will inform our future proposed standards

and we will continue to work with CARB on additional program related issues and seek their

input as we work toward our common goal of a National Program. We will continue to

coordinate on a number of on

‐ going studies, including technology cost, effectiveness, mass

feasibility, and mass

‐ related safety studies.”
Untitled Page


		

			

			Exhibit 10.8

			

			

		

		
			PROMISSORY NOTE

					

				

		

		
			$300,000

				Los Angeles, California

				September 25, 2002

		

		

		

		            FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned, Pure Play Media, Inc. ("Maker"), promises to pay to the order of Michael Fitzgerald ("Ninn Worx") ("Payee"), at Chatsworth, California, (or at such other place as the holder of this note may from time to time designate in writing), the principal sum of Three Hundred Thousand Dollars ($300,000), without interest in four equal semi-annual installments commencing on the last day of the sixth full month following the Capitalization Date.  The Capitalization Date to be defined as the date on which all principal, interest and other moneys owing by the Corporation to Doral EZ Investments Inc. pursuant to the Loan Agreement have been paid in full.

		

		            This note is subject to the ASSET PURCHASE AGREEMENT ("Agreement") made and entered into as of September 25, 2002, by and between Michael Fitzgerald (aka "Ninn Worx") an individual and Pure Play Media, Inc., a California corporation ("Pure Play" or "PPM"), and any conflict between this note and the Agreement shall be resolved in favor of the agreement.

		

		    Maker shall have the right to prepay in part or in full, without penalty, this promissory note, together with accrued interest to the date of prepayment on the amount of principal thus prepaid, at any time or times in the inverse order of maturity.

		

		    In the event of any failure to pay when due any installment of interest under this note or any installment of the principal sum of this note, and the continuance of that failure to pay for a period of 10 days after written notice, by certified or registered mail or by hand delivery, of this failure, this promissory note shall be considered to be in default and the entire unpaid principal sum, together with accrued interest, shall at the option of the holder become immediately due and payable in full.

		

		    Except as set forth in this note, Maker waives presentment, demand, and presentation for payment, notice of nonpayment and dishonor, protest and notice of protest and expressly agrees that this promissory note or any payment under this note may be extended from time to time without in any way affecting the liability of Maker.

		

		    In the event of default and the placement of this promissory note in the hands of an attorney for collection, Maker agrees to pay all collection costs and expenses, including attorney fees equal to Two percent (2%) of the amount then due.

		

		    The validity and construction of this promissory note and all matters pertaining to it are to be determined in accordance with the laws of the State of California.

		

		 

		

		

		

		

		

		

		  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Maker by its appropriate officers duly authorized, has executed this promissory note and affixed its corporate seal on this September 25, 2002.

		

		

		

		Maker:

		

		

		/s/ Richard Arnold

		Richard Arnold,

			Pure Play Media, Inc.

		

		

		/s/ Sieg Badke

		Sieg Badke,

			Pure Play Media, Inc.
IV 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 722 

Expressing the sense of the Congress regarding the importance of oral health, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 14, 2006 

Mr. BRADLEY of New Hampshire (for himself and Mr. ALLEN) submitted the 

following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and 

Commerce 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the Congress regarding the 

importance of oral health, and for other purposes. 

Whereas the Surgeon General of the United States Public 

Health Service has determined that oral health is integral 

to general health; 

Whereas the Surgeon General of the United States Public 

Health Service has noted oral-systemic disease connections, including possible associations between chronic oral 

infections and diabetes, heart and lung diseases, stroke, 

low-birth-weight, and premature births; 

Whereas the burden of dental and oral health diseases restricts activities in school, work, and home, and often significantly diminishes the quality of life; 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 722 IH 

Whereas oral health diseases, including dental caries and periodontal disease, are largely preventable; 

Whereas the effective treatment and prevention of such diseases are substantially aided by access to highly trained 

dental primary care professionals; 

Whereas the Academy of General Dentistry was officially incorporated in 1952, with the mission to serve as the premier resource for general dentists committed to improving patient care through lifelong learning and continuing 

education; 

Whereas the Academy of General Dentistry has grown to represent over 33,000 general dentists who provide primary 

care oral health care services; 

Whereas the Academy of General Dentistry encourages excellence in continuing education and professionalism 

through its earned professional designation programs 

known as Mastership, Fellowship and Lifelong Learning 

and Service Recognition; and 

Whereas the Academy of General Dentistry has signed a 

memorandum of understanding with the Department of 

Health and Human Services to help improve the oral 

health status of Americans and achieve the objectives of 

the Department’s Healthy People 2010 initiative: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That— 

2 (1) it is the sense of the House of Representa3 tives that access to oral health care services and the 

4 prevention of oral health care disease is integral to 

5 achieving and maintaining good health; and 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
3 

•HRES 722 IH 

1 (2) the House of Representatives recognizes the 

2 Academy of General Dentistry and the organiza3 tion’s members for their role in promoting excellence 

4 in continuing dental education, for promoting high 

5 standards of training and professionalism in the 

6 field of primary dental care, and for helping to ad7 dress the treatment and prevention of oral health 

8 disease. 

Æ 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
§ 850.10 Development and approval of the CBDPP. ( a ) *Preparation and submission of initial CBDPP to DOE.* ( 1 ) The responsible employer at a DOE facility must ensure that a CBDPP is prepared for the facility and submitted to the appropriate Head of DOE Field Element before beginning beryllium activities, but no later than April 6, 2000 of this part.
( 2 ) If the CBDPP has separate sections addressing the activities of multiple contractors at the facility, the Head of DOE Field Element will designate a single DOE contractor to review and approve the sections prepared by other contractors, so that a single consolidated CBDPP for the facility is submitted to the Head of DOE Field Element for review and approval.
( b ) *DOE review and approval.* The appropriate Head of DOE Field Element must review and approve the CBDPP. ( 1 ) The initial CBDPP and any updates are deemed approved 90 days after submission if they are not specifically approved or rejected by DOE earlier.
( 2 ) The responsible employer must furnish a copy of the approved CBDPP, upon request, to the DOE Director, Office of Environment, Health, Safety and Security or designee, DOE program offices, and affected workers or their designated representatives.
( c ) *Update.* The responsible employer must submit an update of the CBDPP to the appropriate Head of DOE Field Element for review and approval whenever a significant change or significant addition to the CBDPP is made or a change in contractors occurs. The Head of DOE Field Element must review the CBDPP at least annually and, if necessary, require the responsible employer to update the CBDPP.
( d ) *Labor Organizations.* If a responsible employer employs or supervises beryllium-associated workers who are represented for collective bargaining by a labor organization, the responsible employer must: ( 1 ) Give the labor organization timely notice of the development and implementation of the CBDPP and any updates thereto; and
( 2 ) Upon timely request, bargain concerning implementation of this part, consistent with the Federal labor laws.
[64 FR 68905, Dec. 8, 1999, as amended at 71 FR 68733, Nov. 28, 2006; 80 FR 5008, Jan. 30, 2015; 88 FR 41293, June 26, 2023]
| **Scientific Investigations Map          2839** |
|-------------------------------------------------|

| Surficial geologic map of the Northeast Memphis quadrangle, Shelby County, Tennessee |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

By Randy Cox**Version 1.0**The text of this report is presented here in Portable Document Format.      The latest version of Adobe Acrobat Reader® or similar software is      required to view it. If you wish to download the latest version of Acrobat      Reader® free of charge, click here. SIM 2839 PDF        file (2.42 MB)For printing and viewing
Text Only PDF file (25 KB)
(This version of the report is accessible as defined in Section 508.)Readme TXT file (2 KB) SIM 2839 MET file (14 KB)Metadata file
 
2839.zip (537 KB)ZIPPED archive of ArcInfo and ArcView files2839.tar.gz (540 KB)TARRED and GZIPPED archive of ArcInfo and ArcView filesbases.zip (2.02 MB)ZIPPED archive of base maps imagesbases.tar.gz (2.02 MB)TARRED and GZIPPED archive of base maps imagesAccessibilityFOIAPrivacyPolicies and Notices
U.S. Department of the Interior | U.S. Geological Survey      URL: https://pubsdata.usgs.gov/pubs/sim/2004/2839/Questions or Assistance: USGS Web ContactPage Last Modified: Thr Dec  1 17:04 EDT 2016
No. 17,390.

#### Edwards et al. *v.*State, ex rel. Lockwood.

Filed December 18, 1895.

From the Miami Circuit Court.

*Mitchell <& Cole,*for appellants.

*W. B. McClintic*and *Bartley & Lamrence,*for appellee.

Monks. J.

The questions involved in this case are the same as those in the case of *Edwards et al., Trustees of the School City of Peru,*v. *State, ex rel. Kesling,*143 Ind. 84, and upon the authority of that case the judgment in this case is affirmed.
Record of Discussion

Docket No. FAA-2012-1228 Directorate Identifier: 2012-NM-190-AD

With whom outside the FAA has this AD action been discussed (i.e., Design Approval 

Holder, manufacturer, ATA, NBAA, RAA, AOPA, ALPA, GAMA, etc)? 

ORGANIZATION PERSON 

CONTACTED

DATE RESPONSE

refer to AD 2012-15-15 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other/Additional Information:
# EUR-Lex - 31986R1473 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31986R1473

**Council Regulation (EEC) No 1473/86 of 13 May 1986 amending Regulation (EEC) No 2759/75 on the common organization of the market in pigmeat **

*
Official Journal L 133 , 21/05/1986 P. 0036 - 0036 Finnish special edition: Chapter 3 Volume 20 P. 0235 Swedish special edition: Chapter 3 Volume 20 P. 0235 *

COUNCIL REGULATION (EEC) No 1473/86 of 13 May 1986 amending Regulation (EEC) No 2759/75 on the common organization of the market in pigmeat

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community and, in particular, Article 43 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the Commission (1),

Having regard to the opinion of the European Parliament (2),

Whereas Article 20 of Regulation (EEC) No 2759/ 75 (3), as last amended by Regulation (EEC) No 3768/ 85 (4), lays down that market support measures may be taken in order to take account of any restrictions imposed on the free circulation of pigmeat in consequence of measures taken in the field of veterinary or health policy; whereas the said measures are at present strictly limited to the markets affected by such restriction; whereas restrictions on imports into third countries of products from a Member State part of whose territory is affected by an epidemic may have serious consequences for all the exports of the Member State concerned; whereas the possibility of adopting market support measures in such cases should therefore be extended to the entire territory of a Member State,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Article 20 of Regulation (EEC) No 2709/75 is hereby replaced by the following:

'Article 20

In order to take account of any restrictions on intra- Community trade or trade with third countries resulting from the application of measures taken to combat the spread of animal diseases, exceptional measures may be taken to support the market affected by such restrictions, in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 24. Such measures may be taken only in so far as and for such period as is strictly necessary for the support of that market.'

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the third day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 13 May 1986.

For the Council

The President

W. F. van EEKELEN

(1)OJ No C 85, 14.4.1986, p. 83.(2)Opinion delivered on 17 April 1986 (not yet published in the Official Journal).(3)OJ No L 282, 1.11.1975, p. 1.(4)OJ No L 362, 31.12.1985, p. 8.
226 So.2d 518

#### STATE of Louisiana v. Gilberto HERNANDEZ, and one Frank Torres, each.

No. 50126.

Sept. 24, 1969.

In re: Gilberto Hernandez and Frank Torres applying for writs of mandamus, review and habeas corpus.

The application is denied. The showing made does not warrant the relief sought.
H. Res. 842

In the House of Representatives, U.S., 

June 6, 2006.

Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it 

shall be in order without intervention of any point of order 

to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 5254) to set schedules 

for the consideration of permits for refineries. The bill shall 

be considered as read. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill to final passage without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate equally divided 

and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member 

of the Committee on Energy and Commerce; and (2) one motion to recommit.

Attest: 

Clerk.
(April 14, 1970)

#### Isabella Bridger, Individually, and as Administratrix of the Estate of James E. Bridger, Deceased, Plaintiff, v. John H. Donaldson, Respondent, and Whippet Motor Lines Corp., Appellant, et al., Defendants.

Order entered *629November 17, 1969, granting motion to vacate default and to serve an answer to complaint and cross complaint, unanimously modified on the law, the facts, and in the exercise of discretion, without costs or disbursements, so as to deny motion to open' default in answering cross complaint. That portion of the appeal from the other provisions of the order opening defendant Donaldson’s default in answering the complaint is dismissed, without costs and without disbursements. Although CPLR 5015 (subd. [a], par. 1) does permit relief from an *“*excusable default ” there must first be a demonstration of both an impressive reason vindicating the delay in answering and a meritorious defense. *(Investment Corp. of Philadelphia*v. *Spector,*12 A D 2d 911; *Levine*v. *Fal-Bar Argentinian Corner Best.,*18 A D 2d 611.) Neither is here present. The defendant Donaldson, despite repeated and importunate admonitions, made no effort to appear in this litigation until April 7, 1969, at which time he finally sought vacatur of the inquest and judgment of May 7, 1968. When we consider that the initial complaint is dated February 18, 1965, and the cross complaint July 12, 1965, the delay of the defendant Donaldson is insupportable. Nor is there any setting forth of facts indicating the existence of a meritorious defense to the cross complaint; we note also the failure to submit a proposed answer with respondent’s papers. (Cf. *Levine*v. *Fal-Bar Argentinian Corner Best., supra.)*However, since plaintiff has not appealed from the order insofar as it opens respondent’s default in answering the complaint, appellant may not question that part of the order since appellant is not an aggrieved party in respect of that relief (CPLR 5511). Concur — Eager, J. P., McGivern, Markewich and Nunez, JJ.
#### § 605.7 [Reserved]