alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 1130.3 Exceptions from requirements of this part.

Exceptions are permitted from the administrative requirements in this part only as described at 2 CFR 1126.3.
ATTACHMENT HEADER SHEET

Attachment Number 005

Attachment Name

DMP process description

Associated PMN Section Number

Pt.2, Sec.A, id.

Does not contain CBI

Report Number

DMP_101 122926607598
Substance: 3,4-Dimethylpyrazol (DMP) CAS # 2820-37-3

Diagram of the major unit operation steps

SIMPORT of 3,4-Dimethylpyrazol

(liquid formulation, containing 72 % DMP,

20 % water and 8 % Phosphoric acid)
IV 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 814 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4755) to amend title 49, United 

States Code, to modify the mediation and implementation requirements 

of section 40122 regarding changes in the Federal Aviation Administration personnel management system, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 12, 2006 

Mr. COSTELLO submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Rules 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4755) to amend 

title 49, United States Code, to modify the mediation 

and implementation requirements of section 40122 regarding changes in the Federal Aviation Administration 

personnel management system, and for other purposes. 

1 Resolved, That immediately upon the adoption of this 

2 resolution the House shall without intervention of any 

3 point of order consider in the House the bill (H.R. 4755) 

4 to amend title 49, United States Code, to modify the medi5 ation and implementation requirements of section 40122 

6 regarding changes in the Federal Aviation Administration 

7 personnel management system, and for other purposes. 


dsatterwhite on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
2 

HRES 814 IH

1 The bill shall be considered as read. The previous question 

2 shall be considered as ordered on the bill to final passage 

3 without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate 

4 on the bill equally divided and controlled by the chairman 

5 and ranking minority member of the Committee on Trans6 portation and Infrastructure; and (2) one motion to re7 commit. 

Æ 


dsatterwhite on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
#### §§ 2300.11-2300.2335 [Reserved]
IV 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 792 

Recognizing the 40th anniversary of the independence of Guyana and extending best wishes to Guyana for peace and further progress, development, 

and prosperity. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 2, 2006 

Mr. MEEKS of New York (for himself, Mr. MCNULTY, Mrs. CHRISTENSEN, 

Mr. PAYNE, and Mr. OWENS) submitted the following resolution; which 

was referred to the Committee on International Relations 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the 40th anniversary of the independence of 

Guyana and extending best wishes to Guyana for peace 

and further progress, development, and prosperity. 

Whereas Guyana gained independence from the United Kingdom on May 26, 1966; 

Whereas since Guyana became an independent country, the 

interests of Guyana and the United States have been 

closely aligned; 

Whereas Guyana is a supporter and ally of the United States 

in the Global War on Terror, and joins the United States 

in promoting political and economic freedoms, combating 

poverty, crime, disease, and drugs, and promoting security, stability, and prosperity; 


cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 792 IH 

Whereas the bonds of association and friendship between the 

peoples of the two countries have been strengthened by 

the large number of Guyanese who have migrated to the 

United States, where they make significant contributions 

to both the United States and Guyana; and 

Whereas Guyana is an integral member of the Caribbean region and a constructive partner of the United States in 

fulfilling the agenda of the Western Hemisphere: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives recog2 nizes the 40th anniversary of the independence of Guyana 

3 and extends best wishes to Guyana for peace and further 

4 progress, development, and prosperity. 

Æ 


cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1060 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1060

 Commending Alice Allison Dunnigan for her barrier-breaking career in 
                              journalism.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 12, 2018

Ms. Clarke of New York (for herself, Ms. Bass, Mr. Pocan, Mr. Hastings, 
Ms. Norton, Ms. Lee, Mr. Carson of Indiana, and Mrs. Demings) submitted 
   the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 
                    Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Commending Alice Allison Dunnigan for her barrier-breaking career in 
                              journalism.

Whereas Alice Allison Dunnigan was born on April 27, 1906, in Russellville, 
        Kentucky, where she overcame poverty, segregation, and sexism in order 
        to break barriers for African-American women throughout the country;
Whereas Ms. Dunnigan served as Washington Bureau Chief of the Associated Negro 
        Press from 1947 to 1961, publishing stories in over 110 African-American 
        newspapers throughout the country, informing people of the ways in which 
        government decisions impacted their lives and forcing decisionmakers to 
        address key issues impacting minority communities;
Whereas Ms. Dunnigan became the first African-American woman accredited to cover 
        the White House, Congress, Department of State, and Supreme Court as a 
        result of her proven journalism skills and hard-hitting reporting style;
Whereas Ms. Dunnigan was one of only three African Americans and one of two 
        women in the press corps that fully covered President Harry S. Truman's 
        1948 Presidential campaign;
Whereas Ms. Dunnigan's commitment to truth, honesty, and equality served as the 
        basis for her employment as an education consultant to the President's 
        Committee on Equal Employment Opportunity under the Kennedy 
        administration, where she fought to ensure that all Americans had equal 
        employment rights regardless of age, race, or sex; and
Whereas Ms. Dunnigan demonstrated an extraordinary commitment to journalism, the 
        truth, and equality for all Americans: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives commends Alice Allison 
Dunnigan for her barrier-breaking career in journalism.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 200.423 Alcoholic beverages.

Costs of alcoholic beverages are unallowable.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MIGUEL ANGEL QUIJOSA, 

Petitioner, 

 v. 

JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney 

General, 

Respondent.

No. 15-72816 

Agency No. A205-065-550 

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted August 9, 2017**

Before: SCHROEDER, TASHIMA, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Miguel Angel Quijosa, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for 

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to 

reconsider. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of 

discretion the BIA’s denial of a motion to reconsider, Cano-Merida v. INS, 311 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

AUG 15 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 15-72816 

F.3d 960, 964 (9th Cir. 2002), and we deny the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion to reconsider as 

untimely where Quijosa’s filed the motion over seven months after the filing 

deadline. See 8 U.S.C. § 1229a(c)(6)(B) (setting a 30 day deadline for motions to 

reconsider).

We do not consider Quijosa’s contentions relating to the agency’s 

underlying denial of cancellation of removal. We previously addressed the 

agency’s denial of relief in Quijosa v. Holder, No. 13-73669 (9th Cir. Feb. 25, 

2014) (Order). 

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
H. Res. 545

In the House of Representatives, U.S., 

December 18, 2005.

Whereas the United States supports the development of democracy, free markets, and civil society in Uzbekistan 

and in other states in Central Asia; 

Whereas the rule of law, the impartial application of the law, 

and equal justice for all courts of law are pillars of all 

democratic societies; 

Whereas Sanjar Umarov was reportedly arrested in 

Tashkent, Uzbekistan, on October 22, 2005; 

Whereas Sanjar Umarov is a businessman and leader of the 

Uzbek opposition party, Sunshine Coalition; 

Whereas Sanjar Umarov was reportedly taken into custody 

on October 22, 2005, during a crackdown on the Sunshine Coalition that included a raid of its offices and seizure of its records; 

Whereas Sanjar Umarov was reportedly charged with grand 

larceny; 

Whereas press accounts report that representatives of Sanjar 

Umarov claim that Mr. Umarov was drugged and abused 

while at his pretrial confinement center in Tashkent, 

Uzbekistan, but such accounts could not be immediately 

confirmed, and official information about the health, 
2

•HRES 545 EH 

whereabouts, and treatment while in custody of Mr. 

Umarov has thus far been unavailable; 

Whereas the United States has expressed its serious concern 

regarding the overall state of human rights in Uzbekistan 

and is seeking to clarify the facts of this case; 

Whereas the European Union (EU) and the Organization for 

Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) have expressed concern about the arrest and possible abuse of 

Sanjar Umarov; and 

Whereas the Government of Uzbekistan is party to various 

treaty obligations, and in particular those under the 

International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, 

which obligate governments to provide for due process in 

criminal cases: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives that—

(1) the law enforcement and judicial authorities of 

Uzbekistan should ensure that Sanjar Umarov is accorded the full measure of his rights under the 

Uzbekistan Constitution to defend himself against any 

and all charges that may be brought against him, in a 

fair and transparent process, so that individual justice 

may be done; 

(2) the Government of Uzbekistan should observe 

its various treaty obligations, especially those under the 

International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, 

which obligate governments to provide for due process in 

criminal cases; and 
3

•HRES 545 EH 

(3) the Government of Uzbekistan should publicly 

clarify the charges against Sanjar Umarov, his current 

condition, and his whereabouts. 

Attest:

Clerk.
§ 417.660 Will administrative agreement information about me in the designated integrity and performance system accessible through SAM be corrected or updated? Yes, the suspending or debarring official who entered information into the designated integrity and performance system about an administrative agreement with you: ( a ) Must correct the information within three business days if he or she subsequently learns that any of the information is erroneous.
( b ) Must correct in the designated integrity and performance system, within three business days, the ending date of the period during which the agreement is in effect, if the agreement is amended to extend that period.
( c ) Must report to the designated integrity and performance system, within three business days, any other modification to the administrative agreement.
( d ) Is strongly encouraged to amend the information in the designated integrity and performance system in a timely way to incorporate any update that he or she obtains that could be helpful to Federal awarding agencies who must use the system.
Order entered April 26, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-00184-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF A.M.C. AND E.N.C., III, CHILDREN

On Appeal from the 330th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DF-12-21078

ORDER

Appellant filed a motion to stay proceedings in the trial court pursuant to the Service 

Members Civil Relief Act. See 50 U.S.C.A. § 3932. By order dated April 1, 2019, the trial court 

granted the motion to stay proceedings and abated the case “as to all matters until June 30, 2019 

or until further Order of this Court.” Before the Court is appellee’s April 2, 2019 motion for 

stay. At the time the trial court signed the April 1 order, appellee had pending in the trial court a 

motion for temporary orders pending appeal. See TEX. FAM. CODE ANN. § 109.001(a). Appellee 

asserts in her motion that the trial court will lose jurisdiction to hear and consider her motion for 

temporary orders. See id. § 109.001(b-2). In light of the trial court’s April 1 order, proceedings 

in the trial court are abated, including the hearing on her motion for temporary orders pending 

appeal. For this reason, we DENY appellee’s motion.

Also before the Court is appellant’s April 25, 2019 motion seeking a sixty-day extension 

of time to file his brief. We GRANT the motion and extend the time to June 28, 2019.

/s/ KEN MOLBERG 

JUSTICE
exv4w1



 





Exhibit 4.1




AMENDMENT NO. 2

TO THE TYLER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

STOCK OPTION PLAN

(AMENDED AND RESTATED AS OF MAY 12, 2000)




     Pursuant to Section 18 of the Tyler Technologies, Inc. Stock Option Plan (Amended and Restated
as of May 12, 2000) (the “Plan”), Section 5 of the Plan is hereby amended in its entirety to read
as follows:




     5. SHARES SUBJECT TO PLAN. The Committee may not grant Options under the Plan
for more than 7,500,000 shares of Common Stock and may not grant Options to any
Participant for more than 7,500,000 shares of Common Stock, but these numbers may be
adjusted to reflect, if deemed appropriate by the Committee, any stock dividend,
stock split, share combination, recapitalization or the like, of or by the Company.
Shares to be optioned and sold may be made available from either authorized but
unissued Common Stock or Common Stock held by the Company in its treasury. Shares
that by reason of the expiration of an Option or otherwise are no longer subject to
purchase pursuant to an Option granted under the Plan may be re-offered under the
Plan.



     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Amendment effective as of the
6th day of May, 2004.



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	TYLER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	By:
	 	/s/ H. Lynn Moore, Jr.
 

	 	 
	 

	 	Name:
	 	H. Lynn Moore, Jr.	 	 
	 

	 	Title:
	 	Vice President, General Counsel &	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	Secretary
January 9 , 2013

Ms. Kristin Fitzgerald , Environmental Protection Specialist

US EPA

5304P 1200 Pennsylvania Ave, NW Washington, DC 20460

RE: Estimate of Pharmaceutical Generation Rates for Colorado Nursing Homes

Dear M s

. Fitzgerald :

The Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, Hazardous Materials and Waste Management Division (the Division) estimates that 0.1 0 to 0. 28 pounds of pharmaceutical waste is generated by Colorado nursing home s p er bed

, per month. Therefore, with approximate ly 20,000 licensed beds in nursing home facilities
statewide , we estimate that between approximately 2 4 ,000 and 67 ,000 pounds of pharmaceutical waste is generated each year by Colorado nursing homes. According to this estimate

, a 100

- bed nursing home migh t expect to generate approximately 10 to 28 pounds of pharmaceutical waste per month.

Th is estimate is for the net weight (without packaging) of all types of pharmaceutical wastes including those that are RCRA hazardous, non

- RCRA hazardous, DEA controlled, prescription, and over

- the

- counter. This estimate includes inert ingredients for most waste pharmaceuticals that were not originally in pill or capsule form such as liquids, gels, lotions, and ointments. The estimate includes vitamins (since some vitamins can contain RCRA regulated heavy metals) but specifically excludes high volume nutritional supplements such as fiber

, protein supplements, and meal replacement drinks since they have the potential to significantly skew the data upward and

pos e little to no environmental concern

.

In Colorado, licensing regulations require nursing homes to track all drugs that are destroyed ( 6 CCR 1011

- 1, Chapter V, Section 16.6 ) Therefore, i n order to arrive at our estimate, the Division obtained copies of drug destruction logs from three Colorado nursing homes

. The table below gives further details regarding the nursing

homes used for the estimate

.

Nursing Home # of

licensed

beds Dates of drug logs reviewed How waste was disposed during review period Area of State

A 49 January 2011

– October 2011 (10 months) Sharps container Northwest

B 120 September 2011

– April 2011 (8 months) Sharps container South

C 56 October 2011

– July 2012 (10 months) Chemotherapy
waste container Central (Denver

Metro Area)It is important to note that the Division had to make numerous assumptions to arrive at these figures, and

therefore they should be treated as estimates. In F all 2013, the Division plans to begin requiring all nursing homes to report the volumes o f RCRA hazardous and non

- RCRA hazardous pharmaceutical waste s that they generate. We look forward to being able to compare our estimates with this future data.

Please feel free to contact me at (303)692

- 3351 if you h ave any questions at all.

Sincerely,

Lillian Gonzalez , Health Care Sector Lead

Hazardous Waste Compliance Assurance Unit

xc: Kathryn Stewart, CDPHE
Joe Schi e ffelin, CDPHE
Exhibit 10.29  



	[EntreMed Logo]	 	www.entremed.com




December 19,
2005 


Affymax, Inc.

4001 Miranda Avenue

Palo Alto, California 94304

Attn: Robert Naso, Ph.D.

          Executive Vice President, R&D 


Re:     Second Extension of Letter Agreement for TFPI Product Candidates


Dear
Dr. Naso: 


        I
am writing with reference to the Letter Agreement between Affymax, Inc. ("Affymax") and EntreMed, Inc. ("EntreMed") dated as of September 20, 2004 (together with
each of the exhibits thereto, the "Letter Agreement") and the related Extension Letter dated as of August 23, 2005 between Affymax and EntreMed (the "First Extension Letter"), pursuant
to which EntreMed and Affymax agreed to extend the Term of the Letter Agreement to December 31, 2005. All capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meaning given to such
terms in the Letter Agreement. 


        As
both parties would like to continue the Research Collaboration under the Letter Agreement, pending our current negotiations relating to a Co-Development and
Co-Commercialization Agreement, the Term of the Letter Agreement is agreed to be further extended until February 28, 2006. Both Affymax and EntreMed acknowledge and agree that,
except as otherwise set forth herein, all terms and conditions of the Letter Agreement and the First Extension Letter remain unchanged and in full force and effect. 


        Please
confirm your agreement to extend the Term of the Letter Agreement (including, without limitation, the period to enter into a Co-Development and
Co-Commercialization Agreement) to February 28, 2006, by countersigning this Letter and returning the countersigned letter to EntreMed. 



	 	 	Very truly yours,
	
 	
 	

EntreMed, Inc.
	
 	
 	

By:	

/s/ Marc Corrado
 Name: Marc Corrado

Title: Vice President, Corporate Development







	 ACCEPTED AND AGREED:	 	 
	
 Affymax, Inc.	
 	

 
	
 By:	

/s/ Robert Naso
 Name: Robert Naso

Title: Exec. V.P.

Date: 20 Dec 2005

	
 	

 











 


EntreMed,
Inc. / 9640 Medical Center Drive / Rockville, MD 20850

240.864.2600 phone / 240.864.2601 fax
§ 71.14 Exemption for low-level materials. ( a ) A licensee is exempt from all the requirements of this part with respect to shipment or carriage of the following low-level materials: ( 1 ) Natural material and ores containing naturally occurring radionuclides that are either in their natural state, or have only been processed for purposes other than for the extraction of the radionuclides, and which are not intended to be processed for the use of these radionuclides, provided the activity concentration of the material does not exceed 10 times the applicable radionuclide activity concentration values specified in appendix A, Table A-2, or Table A-3 of this part.
( 2 ) Materials for which the activity concentration is not greater than the activity concentration values specified in appendix A, Table A-2, or Table A-3 of this part, or for which the consignment activity is not greater than the limit for an exempt consignment found in appendix A, Table A-2, or Table A-3 of this part.
( 3 ) Non-radioactive solid objects with radioactive substances present on any surfaces in quantities not in excess of the levels cited in the definition of contamination in § 71.4.
( b ) A licensee is exempt from all the requirements of this part, other than §§ 71.5 and 71.88, with respect to shipment or carriage of the following packages, provided the packages do not contain any fissile material, or the material is exempt from classification as fissile material under § 71.15: ( 1 ) A package that contains no more than a Type A quantity of radioactive material;
( 2 ) A package transported within the United States that contains no more than 0.74 TBq (20 Ci) of special form plutonium-244; or
( 3 ) The package contains only LSA or SCO radioactive material, provided— ( i ) That the LSA or SCO material has an external radiation dose of less than or equal to 10 mSv/h (1 rem/h), at a distance of 3 m from the unshielded material; or
( ii ) That the package contains only LSA-I or SCO-I material.
[69 FR 3786, Jan. 26, 2004, as amended at 80 FR 34012, June 12, 2015]
First Amendment to the ClubCorp, Inc. Omnibus Stock Plan



 Exhibit 10.31 
 FIRST AMENDMENT 
 TO THE CLUBCORP, INC. 
 OMNIBUS STOCK PLAN 
 This First Amendment to the ClubCorp, Inc. Omnibus Stock
Plan (the “Amendment”) of ClubCorp, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), is effective as of the 8th day of May, 2006, by the Company pursuant to the terms of Section 7.2 of the ClubCorp, Inc. Omnibus Stock Plan, as
amended (the “Plan”). 
 RECITIALS: 
 WHEREAS, the Company originally established the Plan as approved and ratified by the stockholders of the Company, effective February 10, 1998; 
 WHEREAS, the Plan was previously amended and restated effective as of January 1, 2001 and January 1, 2005; 
 WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”) approved the increase in the number of shares authorized to be issued under the Plan by 500,000
shares; and 
 WHEREAS, the Board approved the form of this Amendment to the Plan. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to the authority of the Board of Directors of the Company under Section 7.2 of the Plan, the Plan is hereby amended as follows: 

1. Section 2.1 of the Plan is hereby amended by deleting the reference to “seven million six hundred thirty eight thousand eight hundred
sixty two (7,638,862)” and substituting in lieu thereof “eight million one hundred thirty eight thousand eight hundred sixty two (8,138,862)”. 
 2. This Amendment shall be effective as of May 8, 2006. 
 3. All initially capitalized terms used
without definition herein shall have the meanings set forth therefore in the Plan. Except as expressly amended hereby, the Plan shall remain in full force and effect. 
 [signature page follows] 
  

 1 








 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment is executed and delivered as of the 8th day of May, 2006. 
  

			
	CLUBCORP, INC.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Tom Henslee

	Name:	 	Tom Henslee
	Title:	 	Secretary


  

 2