alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
-84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72 -70

 34

 36

 38

 40

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

05/31

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 31 May 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.92 N 77.01 W Meters AGL

★

■

■

■

■

★ ■ ■ ■ ■

★

●

● ●

●

★ ●

● ●

●
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>

The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated financial statements and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements.

<S>                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                               YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           MAY-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                MAY-31-1996
<CASH>                                      4,432,278
<SECURITIES>                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                               5,055,579
<ALLOWANCES>                                7,575
<INVENTORY>                                 356,882
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            10,127,900
<PP&E>                                      283,161
<DEPRECIATION>                              4,592,685
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              13,453,530
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       6,867,455
<BONDS>                                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<COMMON>                                    5,482,824
<OTHER-SE>                                  0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                13,453,530
<SALES>                                     24,661,145
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            24,661,145
<CGS>                                       19,225,998
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               19,225,998
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            3,216,318
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          100,550
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             2,253,882
<INCOME-TAX>                                743,651
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         2,253,882
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                                1,510,231
<EPS-PRIMARY>                               .66
<EPS-DILUTED>                               .66
        


</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 101
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 101 appear at 63 FR 14035, Mar. 24, 1998, 66 FR 17358, Mar. 30, 2001, 66 FR 56035, Nov. 6, 2001, and 81 FR 49895, July 29, 2016.

§ 101.5 Food; name and place of business of manufacturer, packer, or distributor. ( a ) The label of a food in packaged form shall specify conspicuously the name and place of business of the manufacturer, packer, or distributor.
( b ) The requirement for declaration of the name of the manufacturer, packer, or distributor shall be deemed to be satisfied, in the case of a corporation, only by the actual corporate name, which may be preceded or followed by the name of the particular division of the corporation. In the case of an individual, partnership, or association, the name under which the business is conducted shall be used.
( c ) Where the food is not manufactured by the person whose name appears on the label, the name shall be qualified by a phrase that reveals the connection such person has with such food; such as “Manufactured for ______”, “Distributed by ______”, or any other wording that expresses the facts.
( d ) The statement of the place of business shall include the street address, city, State, and ZIP code; however, the street address may be omitted if it is shown in a current city directory or telephone directory. The requirement for inclusion of the ZIP code shall apply only to consumer commodity labels developed or revised after the effective date of this section. In the case of nonconsumer packages, the ZIP code shall appear either on the label or the labeling (including invoice).
( e ) If a person manufactures, packs, or distributes a food at a place other than his principal place of business, the label may state the principal place of business in lieu of the actual place where such food was manufactured or packed or is to be distributed, unless such statement would be misleading.
§ 1.1139 How does a laboratory apply for LAAF-accreditation or extend its scope of LAAF-accreditation? ( a ) *Application for LAAF-accreditation.* A laboratory seeking LAAF-accreditation or extension of its scope of LAAF-accreditation must submit its application for LAAF-accreditation to a recognized accreditation body identified on the website described in § 1.1109. The recognized accreditation body will review and assess the application in accordance with the requirements of this subpart. If the laboratory seeking LAAF-accreditation had its LAAF-accreditation withdrawn or one or more methods within its scope of LAAF-accreditation reduced by a recognized accreditation body or has been previously disqualified by FDA, the laboratory must meet the additional requirements specified by § 1.1142(a).
( b ) *Documentation of conformance with ISO/IEC 17025:2017(E).* The laboratory may use documentation of conformance with ISO/IEC 17025:2017(E) (incorporated by reference, see § 1.1101), as applicable and supplemented as necessary, in meeting the applicable requirements of this subpart.
( c ) *Duration of accreditation.* If a LAAF-accredited laboratory maintains compliance with all requirements of this subpart, including accreditation to ISO/IEC 17025:2017(E), the laboratory's LAAF-accreditation will not end until reduced in scope, withdrawn, relinquished, or the laboratory is disqualified, under this subpart.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1

                       EAGLE POINT SOFTWARE CORPORATION
         CALCULATION OF SHARES USED IN DETERMINING PER SHARE EARNINGS

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                       Years Ended June 30,
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                   1997       1996       1995
                                                 -------------------------------
<S>                                              <C>        <C>        <C>
SHARES USED IN DETERMINING PRIMARY EARNINGS
 PER SHARE:

Weighted average common shares outstanding       4,930,119  4,931,084  3,864,581

Weighted average common shares issued within
 a one year period prior to the Company's
 stock offering at prices below the offering
 price of $13.00 per share                                                 1,488

Net effect of stock options based on the
 treasury stock method using the average
 market price during the period                          0     26,899
                                                 -------------------------------
 Total weighted average common and common
  equivalent shares outstanding                  4,930,119  4,957,988  3,873,126
                                                 ===============================
SHARES USED IN DETERMINING FULLY
 DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE:

Weighted average common shares outstanding       4,930,119  4,931,084  3.983.127

Weighted average common shares issued within
 a one year period prior to the Company's
 stock offering, at prices below the offering
 price of $13.00 per share                                                 1,488

Net effect of stock options based on the
 treasury stock method using the average
 market price during the period                          0     26,899
                                                 -------------------------------
 Total weighted average common and common
  equivalent shares outstanding                  4,930,119  4,957,988  3,873,126
                                                 ===============================
</TABLE>
EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0708-DRAFT-0329[1]

-----Forwarded by Melanie King/RTP/USEPA/US on 02/15/2010 09:27PM -----

To: "Higgins, Cortney" <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov> 

From: Melanie King/RTP/USEPA/US 

Date: 01/14/2010 03:23PM 

cc: RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA 

Subject: RE: RICE cost and reduction breakdown by HP range 

Hi Cortney, I added a column with the number of engines to the spreadsheet. 

(See attached file: Existing CI RICE NESHAP costs and emission reductions by HP 

range 1-

13-10.xls) 

Melanie King 

Energy Strategies Group 

Sector Policies and Programs Division 

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

Mail Code D243-01 

RTP, NC 27711 

Phone: (919) 541-2469 

Fax: (919) 541-5450 

king.melanie@epa.gov 

"Higgins, Cortney" ---01/14/2010 02:39:13 PM---Hi Melanie, Thank you for this 

spreadsheet. 

 Do you have a worksheet or information

From:

"Higgins, Cortney" <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov>

To:

Melanie King/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc:

RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Date:

01/14/2010 02:39 PM

Subject

:

RE: RICE cost and reduction breakdown by HP range

Hi Melanie, 

Thank you for this spreadsheet. Do you have a worksheet or information on the 

number of 

sources in each HP range? 

 

Thanks, 

Cortney 

 

From: King.Melanie@epamail.epa.gov [ mailto:King.Melanie@epamail.epa.gov ] 

Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2010 10:49 PM 

Page 1
EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0708-DRAFT-0329[1]

To: Higgins, Cortney 

Cc: wayland.robertj@epa.gov 

Subject: RICE cost and reduction breakdown by HP range 

 

Hi Cortney, 

Attached is a spreadsheet with the breakdown of the estimated costs and reductions 

by HP 

range for the CI RICE NESHAP. I'll also be sending you the data for the MACT floors

that 

Kevin Bromberg requested. 

Melanie King 

Energy Strategies Group 

Sector Policies and Programs Division 

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

Mail Code D243-01 

RTP, NC 27711 

Phone: (919) 541-2469 

Fax: (919) 541-5450 

king.melanie@epa.gov

Page 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>      5
<LEGEND>
     The schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
consolidated financial statements and is qualified in its entirety by reference
to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>   1
       
<S>                                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               MAY-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                    MAY-31-1997
<CASH>                                              545,515
<SECURITIES>                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     4,337,646
<ALLOWANCES>                                         48,196
<INVENTORY>                                         562,401
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  6,133,725
<PP&E>                                           10,259,226
<DEPRECIATION>                                    5,881,455
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   10,793,206
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             8,128,026
<BONDS>                                                   0
<COMMON>                                          3,757,015
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<OTHER-SE>                                       (1,789,649)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     10,793,206
<SALES>                                          25,952,371
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 25,952,371
<CGS>                                           (26,119,469)
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    30,418,002
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  247,575
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (4,632,885)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (1,420,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (3,212,885)
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (3,212,885)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         (1.24)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         (1.24)
        


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 1 (Monday, January 3, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 142]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-32969]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-9245-9]


Notice of Prevention of Significant Deterioration Final 
Determination for Russell City Energy Center

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (``EPA'').

ACTION: Notice of final action.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces that on November 18, 2010, the 
Environmental Appeals Board (EAB) of the EPA denied Petitions for 
Review of a Federal Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) 
Permit issued to Russell City Energy Center, LLC by the Bay Area Air 
Quality Management District (``BAAQMD'').

DATES: The effective date for the EAB's decision is November 18, 2010. 
Pursuant to section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 
7607(b)(1), judicial review of this permit decision, to the extent it 
is available, may be sought by filing a Petition for Review in the 
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on or before March 
4, 2011.

ADDRESSES: The documents relevant to this notice are available for 
public inspection during normal business hours at the following 
address: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9, 75 Hawthorne 
St., San Francisco, CA 94105. To arrange viewing of these documents, 
call Shaheerah Kelly at (415) 947-4156. Due to building security 
procedures, please call Ms. Kelly at least 24 hours before you would 
like to view the documents.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Shaheerah Kelly, Air Division, U.S. 
Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9, 75 Hawthorne St., San 
Francisco, CA 94105. Anyone who wishes to review the EAB decision can 
obtain it at http://www.epa.gov/eab/.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notification of EAB Final Decision: The 
BAAQMD, acting under authority of a PSD delegation agreement dated 
February 4, 2008, issued a PSD permit to Russell City Energy Center, 
LLC, on February 3, 2010, granting approval to construct a new 600-
megawatt natural gas-fired combined-cycle power plant in Hayward, 
California. Five petitioners filed timely Petitions for Review of the 
PSD decision with the EAB. The EAB issued an Order denying the 
Petitions for review on November 18, 2010. One petitioner filed a 
Motion and Supplemental Motion for Reconsideration and/or Clarification 
and Stay of the EAB's November 18, 2010 Order.
    On December 17, 2010, the EAB issued an Order denying the Motion 
and Supplemental Motion for Reconsideration and/or Clarification and 
Stay.

    Dated: December 20, 2010.
Kerry Drake,
Acting Director, Air Division, Region 9.
[FR Doc. 2010-32969 Filed 12-30-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
Exhibit
      32.2





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT


TO
      SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of DOR BioPharma, Inc.
      (the
“Company”) for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2007, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
      undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








**DOR
      BIOPHARMA, INC.**





November
                14, 2007
            by:
            **/s/
                Evan Myrianthopoulos**Evan
                MyrianthopoulosChief
                Financial Officer(Principal
                Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
§ 200.462 Rearrangement and reconversion costs. ( a ) Costs incurred for ordinary and normal rearrangement and alteration of facilities are allowable as indirect costs. Special arrangements and alterations costs incurred specifically for a Federal award are allowable as a direct cost with the prior approval of the Federal awarding agency or pass-through entity.
( b ) Costs incurred in the restoration or rehabilitation of the non-Federal entity's facilities to approximately the same condition existing immediately prior to commencement of Federal awards, less costs related to normal wear and tear, are allowable.
IV 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 798 

Recognizing and celebrating students who overcome immeasurable adversity 

to excel academically. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 4, 2006 

Mr. FATTAH submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Education and the Workforce 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing and celebrating students who overcome 

immeasurable adversity to excel academically. 

Whereas the United States of America was founded on the 

principles of fair competition, collaboration, and equal opportunity; 

Whereas the preparation of young people for success in the 

21st century and beyond is the primary objective of 

America’s public education system; 

Whereas a high-quality, highly competitive education for all 

students is imperative for the economic growth and productivity of the United States; 

Whereas a well-educated populace is critical to the Nation’s 

political and economic well-being and national security; 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 798 IH 

Whereas all students in public elementary schools and secondary schools must have access to an equitable and effective education in order to succeed; 

Whereas students across America work hard every day, overcoming substantial barriers to their academic achievement; 

Whereas individuals, communities, schools, and families succeed in the face of great odds to secure educational opportunity for American children; and 

Whereas continued academic excellence in every community is 

vital to American progress and global competitiveness: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) commends those students who have risen 

3 above the obstacles to their success, both internal 

4 and external; 

5 (2) recognizes the contributions of families, 

6 schools, and communities in student achievement; 

7 (3) encourages all students to continue to work 

8 hard and strive for excellence; 

9 (4) congratulates Hollywood for meeting the 

10 challenge of positively depicting young people in 

11 film; and 

12 (5) recognizes the talents of Laurence 

13 Fishburne, Angela Bassett, Keke Palmer, and Doug 

14 Atchison for the portrayal of an American eduVerDate Aug 31 2005 06:47 May 06, 2006 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\HR798.IH HR798

ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
3 

•HRES 798 IH 

1 cational success story in the newly released movie, 

2 Akeela and the Bee. 

Æ 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
§ 415.3 Purpose. ( a ) The regulations in this part implement Executive Order 12372, “Intergovernmental Review of Federal Programs”, issued July 14, 1982, and amended on April 8, 1983. These regulations also implement applicable provisions of section 401 of the Intergovernmental Cooperation Act of 1968 and section 204 of the Demonstration Cities and Metropolitan Development Act of 1966.
( b ) These regulations are intended to foster an intergovernmental partnership and a strengthened Federalism by relying on State processes and on State, areawide, regional and local coordination for review of proposed Federal financial assistance and direct Federal development.
( c ) The regulations are intended to aid the internal management of the Department, and are not intended to create any right or benefit enforceable at law by a party against the Department or its officers.
#### § 3373.30 What policies and procedures must I follow?

(a) *General.* You must follow the policies and procedures specified in applicable sections of the OMB guidance in Subparts A through F of [2 CFR part 182](/on/2024-09-17/title-2/part-182), as implemented by this part.

(b) *Specific sections of OMB guidance that this part supplements.* In implementing the OMB guidance in [2 CFR part 182](/on/2024-09-17/title-2/part-182), this part supplements four sections of the guidance, as shown in the following table. For each of those sections, you must follow the policies and procedures in the OMB guidance, as supplemented by this part.

| Section of OMB guidance | Section in this part where supplemented | What the supplementation clarifies |
| --- | --- | --- |
| (1) [2 CFR 182.225(a)](/on/2024-09-17/title-2/section-182.225#p-182.225(a)) | § 3373.225 | Whom in the NEH a recipient other than an individual must notify if an employee is convicted for a violation of a criminal drug statute in the workplace. |
| (2) [2 CFR 182.300(b)](/on/2024-09-17/title-2/section-182.300#p-182.300(b)) | § 3373.300 | Whom in the NEH a recipient who is an individual must notify if he or she is convicted of a criminal drug offense resulting from a violation occurring during the conduct of any award activity. |
| (3) [2 CFR 182.500](/on/2024-09-17/title-2/section-182.500) | § 3373.500 | Who in the NEH is authorized to determine that a recipient other than an individual is in violation of the requirements of [2 CFR part 182](/on/2024-09-17/title-2/part-182), as implemented by this part. |
| (4) [2 CFR 182.505](/on/2024-09-17/title-2/section-182.505) | § 3373.505 | Who in the NEH is authorized to determine that a recipient who is an individual is in violation of the requirements of [2 CFR part 182](/on/2024-09-17/title-2/part-182), as implemented by this part. |

(c) *Sections of the OMB guidance that this part does not supplement.* For any section of OMB guidance in Subparts A through F of [2 CFR part 182](/on/2024-09-17/title-2/part-182) that is not listed in [paragraph (b)](/on/2024-09-17/title-2/section-3373.30#p-3373.30(b)) of this section, NEH policies and procedures are the same as those in the OMB guidance.
#### § 1882.5 What does this part do?

This part adopts the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) guidance in subparts A through F of 2 CFR part 182, as supplemented by this part, as the NASA policies and procedures for implementing the portion of the Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1988 (41 U.S.C. 701-707, as amended, hereafter referred to as “the Act”) that applies to grants and cooperative agreements. It thereby gives regulatory effect for NASA to the OMB guidance. Further, it supplements the OMB guidance with NASA-specific regulation.

[79 FR 56487, Sept. 22, 2014. Redesignated at 79 FR 62797, Oct. 21, 2014]
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You havereached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC)Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC.Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of catalogingand locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications.  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the eventthat publications are no longer available from the original publishing agencysite. (Historical purposes)

**Title:**  Connecting threads newsletter.

Fall 2001, Winter 2002

 
SuDoc: I 29.141:
�Item Number: 0648-A-05 (online)
CGP system Number: �000559215
#### § 902.500 Who in the DOE determines that a recipient other than an individual violated the requirements of this part?

The Secretary of the Department of Energy and the Secretary's designee or designees are authorized to make the determinations under 2 CFR 182.500 for DOE, including NNSA.