alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(logo)KPMG
KPMG LLP

811 Main Street

Houston, TX 77002           , .
   , - 0 , - , 0 , , , , , , , , - . .
 
 , , - , .
  As descr ib e d in t he  a c c o m p a n y i ng  M ana g e m e nt's Asse s s m e nt,  f o r s er v ici n g  c r i t e ria  1 1 22( d ) ( 2 )(i ) , 1122( d ) ( 2 ) ( i i ), 1 122(d) ( 2 ) ( v ii ) (a) ,  ( b ) ,  a nd  ( d ) ,  11 2 2( d ) ( 4 ) (i ) ,  112 2 (d)(4 ) ( v i ) ,  1 1 2 2 ( d)(4 ) (x ) (  a ) and  ( b ),  and  1122( 4 ) ( d ) ( 4)(x i ) , t h e  P a rt n e rs h i p  h a s  en g a g e d  v a rio u s  v e ndors  to  p e rf o r m  t h e  a c t i v i t i e s  re q u i r e d by  t he s e s e r v ici n g  cr i ter i a .  T he  P a r t n e rs h i p h a s  d e t e r m i n ed  t h a t  n one  of  t h e se  v en d o r s  is  c ons id er e d a "s e r v ic e r" as d e f i ned  in I tem  1 1 01 ( j )  o f  R e g u la t i o n  A B ,  a n d  t he Pa r t n er s h i p h a s  elec t ed  t o  t a k e  re s pon s i b i lity for  a sse s s i ng  co m p l i a n c e w i th  the  s e r v ici n g  c r i t e r ia  ap p l i c a b l e to  e ach  v end o r as  p e r m i tt e d by  I nte r p r e t a ti o n 17.06  o f  t h e  SEC  Di v i s i on of  Cor p ora t i o n  F i n a n c e  M a n u a l of  P u b l icly  A v ai l a b l e  T e lep h o n e  I n t e r p r e t a t i on s ( I n t e r pretati o n  17.06). As  p e r m i t ted  b y  I n t e r p r e t a t i o n  1 7 .06,  the  P a r t ne r s h i p  has  a s s e rted  that  i t  h a s po l i c ies a nd  p r o c e d u r e s  i n  p l a ce  d e s i g n e d  to  p r o v i d e  r e a s o n a b l e  a s s uran c e  t h a t  t h e  v e nd o r s  a c t i v i t i e s  c o m p l y  in  a l l m a te r i al  r e s p ec t s  w i th  t h e  s e r v ici n g  c r i t e r i a  ap p l ic a b le  t o  e a ch  v endo r .  The  P a rtner s h i p  i s  s o lely res p on s i b l e f or  d e ter m i n i ng that it  m e ets  t h e  S EC  r e q u i r e m e n ts to  a p p l y Interpretation 17.06 f o r  t h e  v e ndors  and r e l a ted  c r i t er i a  a s  described in  i t s  a s sert i on,  a nd  we per f o r m e d  no p r oce d u r e s  w i th  resp e ct t o  t h e Pa r t n er s h i p's  e l igib i lity to  a p p l y  I n terpr e t a t i o n  1 7.0 6 .
  . , , , . 0 .
       J a n u a r y  3 0, 2015
    ,
 . .
 , .
223 So.2d 871

#### STATE of Louisiana v. Chafe FRANK.

No. 49939.

June 27, 1969.

In re: Chafe Frank applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition and mandamus.

Writ refused. We find no error of law in the rulings complained of.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 250 (Thursday, December 30, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 82381]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-32839]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER11-2438-000]


ASC Energy Services, Inc.; Supplemental Notice That Initial 
Market-Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 
Authorization

December 22, 2010.
    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of 
ASC Energy Services, Inc.'s application for market-based rate 
authority, with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such 
application includes a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR 
part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 
385.214). Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a 
copy of that document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability, is January 11, 2011.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in 
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in 
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link 
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification 
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with 
any FERC Online service, please e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#0c4a495e4f4362606562695f797c7c637e784c6a697e6f226b637a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="195f5c4b5a56777570777c4a6c6969766b6d597f7c6b7a377e766f">[email protected]</span></a>, or 
call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-32839 Filed 12-29-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
**31.1
**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

 

           I, Lisa Norman, certify that:

     1)   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of American Home Alliance Corporation.

     2)   Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report.

     3)   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results from operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report.

By:  /s/ Lisa Norman****
`[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 815 Reported in House (RH)]







                                                 House Calendar No. 177
109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 815

                          [Report No. 109-466]

   Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to 
  consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on 
                                 Rules.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 16, 2006

    Mr. Putnam, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION


 
   Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to 
  consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on 
                                 Rules.

    Resolved,  That the requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII for a 
two-thirds vote to consider a report from the Committee on Rules on the 
same day it is presented to the House is waived with respect to any 
resolution reported on the legislative day of May 17, 2006: (1) 
providing for consideration of the concurrent resolution (H. Con. Res. 
376) establishing the congressional budget for the United States 
Government for fiscal year 2007 and setting forth appropriate budgetary 
levels for fiscal years 2008 through 2011; or (2) addressing budget 
enforcement or priorities.
                                                 House Calendar No. 177

109th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                              H. RES. 815

                          [Report No. 109-466]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

   Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to 
  consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on 
                                 Rules.

_______________________________________________________________________

                              May 16, 2006

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed`
#### § 2336.220 What contracts and subcontracts, in addition to those listed in 2 CFR 180.220, are covered transactions?

Although the OMB guidance at 2 CFR 180.220(c) allows a Federal agency to do so (also see option lower tier coverage in the figure in the appendix to 2 CFR part 180), SSA does not extend coverage of nonprocurement suspension and debarment requirements beyond first-tier procurement contracts under a covered nonprocurement transaction.
Editorial Note on Part 9
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 9 appear at 82 FR 52825, Nov. 15, 2017.

§ 9.106 Persons affected and motions for reconsideration. ( a ) Whenever any person whose interests may be directly affected by a portion of a meeting requests that the Commission close such portion to the public for any of the reasons referred to in paragraphs (a) (5), (6), or (7) of § 9.104, the Commission, upon request of any one Commissioner, shall vote by recorded vote whether to close such meeting.
( b ) Any person may petition the Commission to reconsider its action under § 9.105(a) or paragraph (a) of this section by filing a petition for reconsideration with the Commission within seven days after the date of such action and before the meeting in question is held.
( c ) A petition for reconsideration filed pursuant to paragraph (b) of this section shall state specifically the grounds on which the Commission action is claimed to be erroneous, and shall set forth, if appropriate, the public interest in the closing or opening of the meeting. The filing of such a petition shall not act to stay the effectiveness of the Commission action or to postpone or delay the meeting in question unless the Commission orders otherwise.
IV 

House Calendar No. 147 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 642 

[Report No. 109–376] 

Requesting the President and directing the Secretary of State to provide 

to the House of Representatives certain documents in their possession 

relating to the Secretary of State’s trip to Europe in December 2005. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 18, 2005 

Ms. LEE submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on International Relations 

FEBRUARY 10, 2006 

Additional sponsors: Mr. MCGOVERN, Mr. BERMAN, Mr. PAYNE, Mr. ACKERMAN, Mr. MEEKS of New York, Ms. WOOLSEY, Mr. KUCINICH, Mr. 

STARK, Mr. HONDA, Mr. GRIJALVA, Mr. DEFAZIO, Mr. EVANS, and Mr. 

ENGEL

FEBRUARY 10, 2006 

Reported adversely from the Committee on International Relations, referred 

to the House Calendar, and ordered to be printed 

RESOLUTION 

Requesting the President and directing the Secretary of State 

to provide to the House of Representatives certain documents in their possession relating to the Secretary of 

State’s trip to Europe in December 2005. 
2 

•HRES 642 RH 

1 Resolved, That the President is requested and the 

2 Secretary of State is directed to provide to the House of 

3 Representatives, not later than 14 days after the date of 

4 adoption of this resolution, all documents, including tele5 phone and electronic mail records, logs, calendars, min6 utes, memoranda, and advisory legal opinions, in the pos7 session of the President or the Secretary of State, respec8 tively, from the Department of State provided to the Exec9 utive Office of the President in preparation for and during 

10 the Secretary of State’s trip to Germany, Belgium, Roma11 nia, and Ukraine in December 2005, relating to— 

12 (1) United States policies under the United Na13 tions Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, 

14 Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment 

15 toward individuals captured by or transferred to the 

16 United States or detained in United States custody; 

17 and 

18 (2) United States policies regarding any facility 

19 outside of the territory of the United States for the 

20 detention of individuals captured by or transferred 

21 to the United States or detained in United States 

22 custody. 

House Calendar No. 147 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 642 

[Report No. 109–376] 

RESOLUTION 

Requesting the President and directing the SecEurope in December 2005. sion relating to the Secretary of State’s trip to resentatives certain documents in their posses- retary of State to provide to the House of RepFEBRUARY 10, 2006 

Reported adversely from the Committee on International 

to be printed Relations, referred to the House Calendar, and ordered
#### Calcados Samello, S. A., Respondent, v Intershoe Incorporated, Appellant.

Order of the Supreme Court, New York County, entered May 22, 1980, reversed, on the law and the facts, to the extent appealed from, without costs, and the matter remanded to Special Term with directions, (1) to delete from Item q of the notice of discovery so much thereof as requires the production of documents belonging to entities other than defendant and over which defendant has neither possession nor control; and (2) to examine, *in camera,*those portions of the redacted documents to determine whether the parts sought to be excised are relevant to the instant lawsuit. The action here involved is for breach of contract and for goods sold and delivered. Plaintiff served upon defendant an eight-page notice to produce documents. Defendant objected to two groups of documents. One involved those which are the property of Brascan Limited, a Canadian corporation which is the parent of defendant. These documents are in the possession of Brascan and defendant asserts, without contradiction that it requested the documents of Brascan and the request was refused. The second group of documents contain material which deals with defendant’s business relationship with firms other than plaintiff. Defendant asserts that these documents are four in number and it seeks to redact portions of them on the ground that disclosure of these other business relations, which are claimed to be irrelevant to the suit here involved, would seriously prejudice defendant’s relations with those firms. It is obvious that defendant cannot produce that which it does not possess and over which it has no control. Accordingly, Item q of the notice to produce documents must be modified to eliminate the Brascan documents. So far as concerns the four redacted documents, we remand to Special Term for an inspection of the documents *in camera*for the purpose of determining their materiality to the matters here in suit. If they are found to be relevant, the redaction should be overruled. If, on the other hand, it is concluded that they are immaterial, the excision of the questions’ parts should be sustained. Concur — Kupferman, J. P., Birns, Ross, Bloom and Carro, JJ.
# EUR-Lex - 31973D0123 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31973D0123

**73/123/EEC: Commission Decision of 7 May 1973 modifying the Decision of 16 October 1970 exempting the French Republic from the application to certain species of the Council Directive of 30 June 1969 concerning the marketing of seed of oil and fibre plants (Only the French text is authentic) **

*
Official Journal L 145 , 02/06/1973 P. 0043 - 0043 *

COMMISSION DECISION of 7 May 1973 modifying the Decision of 16 October 1970 exempting the French Republic from the application to certain species, of the Council Directive of 30 June 1969 concerning the marketing of seed of oil and fibre plants (Only the French text is authentic) (73/123/EEC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community;

Having regard to the Council Directive of 30 June 1969 (1) concerning the marketing of seed of oil and fibre plants, as last modified by the Directive of 6 December 1972 (2) and in particular, Article 22 thereof;

Having regard to the request from the French Republic;

Whereas, by its Decision of 16 October 1970 (3), the Commission has exempted the French Republic from the application to certain species of the Directive referred to above ; that the French government has informed the Commission that, henceforth, there will be multiplication of soya (Soia hispida L.) in its territory intended for the production of seed ; that the application of control of the production of certified seed of this species is then capable of being introduced;

Whereas since the conditions governing the right for exemption are no longer fulfilled concerning the species Soia hispida L. and that, in consequence it is appropriate to modify the aforesaid Decision;

Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the Opinion of the Management Committee for Agricultural, Horticultural and Forestry Seeds and Plants;

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The Commission Decision of 16 October 1970 is modified as follows:

In Article 1 the subparagraph "f Soia hispida L. Soya" is deleted.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the French Republic.

Done at Brussels, 7 May 1973.

For the Commission

The President

François-Xavier ORTOLI (1)OJ No L 169, 10.7.1969, p. 3. (2)OJ No L 287, 26.12.1972, p. 22. (3)OJ No L 237, 28.10.1970, p. 29.
#### § 963.11 Suitability determination.

DOE will evaluate whether the Yucca Mountain site is suitable for the location of a geologic repository on the basis of the preclosure and postclosure determinations described in §§ 963.12 and 963.15. If DOE's evaluation of the Yucca Mountain site for the location of a geologic repository under §§ 963.12 and 963.15 shows that the geologic repository is likely to meet the applicable radiation protection standards for the preclosure and postclosure periods, then DOE may determine that the site is a suitable location for the development of such a repository.
#### § 1600.30 What regulations must I follow?

The DFC regulations that you must follow are the regulations specified in each applicable section of the OMB guidance in subparts A through I of 2 CFR part 180 as that section is supplemented by the section in this part with the same section number or by additional provisions with no corresponding section number. For any section of OMB guidance in subparts A through I of 2 CFR part 180 that has no corresponding section in this part, DFC regulations are those in the OMB guidance.
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Harry Watley, Appellant, v. Harold W. Follette, as Warden of Green Haven Prison, Respondent.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, dated November 25, 1968, dismissed as moot, without costs. The judgment of •conviction has been reversed *(People*v. *Watley,*32 A D 2d 791). Beldock, P. J., Christ, Brennan, Hopkins and Martuscello, JJ., concur.
<PAGE>   1
Exhibit 11   Computation of Earnings Per Share


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                               THREE MONTHS ENDED               NINE MONTHS ENDED
                                                                  SEPTEMBER 30,                   SEPTEMBER 30,
                                                            --------------------------      -------------------------
                                                             1996             1995              1996          1995
                                                            ------         ----------       -----------   -----------
                                                                                                                 
<S>                                                         <C>            <C>              <C>
PRIMARY EARNINGS PER SHARE:
  Weighted average and common equivalent shares             26,265,693     26,065,752        26,186,500    25,874,205
                                                            ----------     ----------        ----------    ----------
  Net income                                                $3,479,007     $9,073,040       $24,003,163   $23,707,338
                                                            ==========     ==========       ===========   ===========
  Net income per share                                           $0.13          $0.35             $0.92         $0.92
                                                            ==========     ==========       ===========   ===========

FULLY DILUTED
  Weighted average and common equivalent shares             26,265,693     26,065,752        26,186,500    25,874,205
                                                            ----------     ----------       -----------   -----------
  Net income                                                $3,479,007     $9,073,040       $24,003,163   $23,707,338
                                                            ==========     ==========       ===========   ===========
  Net income per share                                           $0.13          $0.35             $0.92         $0.92
                                                            ==========     ==========       ===========   ===========
</TABLE>





                                       31
§ 60.62 Site review. ( a ) Whenever an area has been approved by the President for site characterization, and upon request of a State or an affected Indian Tribe, the Director shall make NRC staff available to consult with representatives of such States and Tribes.
( b ) Requests for consultation shall be made in writing to the Director.
( c ) Consultation under this section may include: ( 1 ) Keeping the parties informed of the Director's views on the progress of site characterization.
( 2 ) Review of applicable NRC regulations, licensing procedures, schedules, and opportunities for State and Tribe participation in the Commission's regulatory activities.
( 3 ) Cooperation in development of proposals for State and Tribe participation in license reviews.