alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
PART 27 – PATENTS, DATA, AND

COPYRIGHTS

SUBPART 27.1 – GENERAL

27.101 Applicability.

SUBPART 27.2 – PATENTS

27.201 Patent and copyright infringement liability.

27.201-2 Contract clauses.

SUBPART 27.71 –– RIGHTS IN TECHNICAL DATA

27.7103-6 Contract clauses.

SUBPART 27.90 – EXPORT CONTROL OF TECHNICAL DATA

27.9001 Policy.

27.9002 Data subject to export control.

27.9003 Contractor eligibility.

SUBPART 27.1 – GENERAL

(Revised September 19, 2016 through PROCLTR 2016-09)

27.101 Applicability.

Refer all patent, copyright, rights in data, and trademark matters through the Office of Counsel to

DLA General Counsel.

SUBPART 27.2 – PATENTS

(Revised September 19, 2016 through PROCLTR 2016-09)

27.201 Patent and copyright infringement liability.
27.201-2 Contract clauses.

(e) Specific patents may be excluded in accordance with FAR 27.201-2(e) only with the prior

approval of DLA General Counsel.

SUBPART 27.71 –– RIGHTS IN TECHNICAL DATA

(Added March 23, 2020 in accordance with PROCLTR 2020-01)

27.7103-6 Contract clauses.

(c) Contracting officers shall insert the clause at DFARS 252.227-7025, Limitations on the Use or

Disclosure of Government Furnished Information Marked with Restrictive Legends, in solicitations

and contracts if the POT includes Standard Text Object (STO) RD002, Covered Defense Information

Applies; STO RD003, Covered Defense Information Potentially Applies; or STO RQ032, Export

Control of Technical Data. These STOs indicate the Government may need to provide controlled

technical data to a contractor for performance of its contract. Such data could potentially be marked

with another contractor’s restrictive legend(s), which meets the conditions for use of the clause at

DFARS 227.7103-6(c).

SUBPART 27.90 – EXPORT CONTROL OF TECHNICAL DATA

(Revised August 30, 2022 through PROCLTR 2022-15)

27.9001 Policy.

Distribution, transfer, or disclosure of export-controlled technology, technical information, or data to

foreign persons or companies may constitute an export under applicable export control regulations,

requiring either an export license or an authorization for such distribution, transfer, or disclosure.

The contracting officer shall comply with 4.7303-1, General; 25.7902-4, Procedures; DFARS 227.71,

Rights in Technical Data; and DFARS PGI 225.7901-2, Export Control, General, to ensure that only

contractors that meet the qualifications in STO RQ032, Export Control of Technical Data, have

access to controlled technical data.

27.9002 Data subject to export control.

For EBS users when export control applies, STO CS003, Identifying Export Control Technical Data,

appears on the purchase request (PR) trailer, and STO RQ032 appears in the POT.

27.9003 Contractor eligibility.
Contractors must have DLA controlling authority approval to be eligible for award, unless one of the

exceptions at PGI 25.7902-4(S-92) applies.
-,- ... 

# • FEDERAL REQUIRD1ENT RCRA REVISION**C~EC~LIST** 3 Interiln Status Staneards**~pplicability** 48 FR 52718-20 November 22, 1983 RCRA CITE STATE AL7HORITY IF**DIFFERE~7** FROM FEDERAL STATl,7E REGULATION REQUIREMENT, EXPLAIN PART 265 - INTERIM**STA.~rAR.CS** FOR a-,lNERS AND OPERATORS OF TSDF'.S SlJBP.;RT A - GrnG..b..L PURPOSE, SCOPE AND APPLICABILITY



# •

• persons to whan reg s apply 265.l.(b) 73-303-400( 1\ 

### &**~2)**

'.Jo\,t?"\ber 22, 1983

-**?3~e** 1 of 1
##### 



Exhibit 10.1 FOURTH AMENDMENT TO
SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT PLAN This Fourth Amendment
to the Greyhound Lines, Inc. (the Company)
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan is made effective as of April 1, 2004. WHEREAS,the Company previously adopted the Greyhound Lines, Inc.
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, as restated effective January 1, 1994,
and as amended by the First Amendment dated as of December 9, 1996, as further
amended by the Second Amendment dated as of January 20, 1999, and as further
amended by the Third Amendment dated as of August 1, 2003 (the Plan); and WHEREAS, the Company, having sought the approval of the Board of Directors
of the Company, desires to amend the Plan as set forth herein. NOW THEREFORE,the Plan shall be amended as follows: 1.       Section 6.1 of the Plan shall be deleted in its entirety and replaced
with the following:  6.1
    
    Calculation of Plan Benefit Credits. The
annual amount credited to the Employer Contribution
Account of a Participant as of the last day of each
Plan Year shall equal the Participants Annual Base
Salary for such Plan Year multiplied by a percentage,
which percentage shall be:  (a)
    
    20 percent in the case of
an officer of the Sponsor in job grade 21 or
above;(b)
    
    20 percent for
Participants that, as of the first day of a
Plan Year beginning on or after January 1,
1996, have completed a minimum of 84 months
of Service with the Sponsor; and(c)
    
    10 percent for all other
Participants. Notwithstanding the foregoing, prior to the
beginning of each Plan Year, the Committee may
establish in writing minimum levels of financial or
operating performance that must be achieved for the
Plan Year if a Participant is to be credited with an
amount for such Plan Year. 2.     Capitalized terms used herein without definition shall have the meaning
ascribed to such terms as set forth in the Plan.  GREYHOUND LINES, INC.By:Stephen E.
GormanPresident and CEO
CERTIFICATION OF ACTING PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND ACTING PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO


SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT RULES 13a‐14(a) AND 15d‐14(a), AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES‐OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Kenneth Goldmann, certify that:


|   |                                                                                
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10‐K/A of Voltari Corporation; and

|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.




Date: April 29, 2016/s/ KENNETH GOLDMANNName:Kenneth GoldmannTitle:Chief Administrative and Accounting Officer  (Acting Principal Executive Officer and Acting Principal Financial Officer)
##### 



Exhibit 31.2 PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICERS CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Cheryl W. Farmer, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Greyhound Lines, Inc. and Subsidiaries;  2.
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;  3.
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;  4.
    The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  a)
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
report is being prepared;b)
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andc)
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that
has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and  5.
    The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):  a)
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
andb)
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting. Date: May 16, 2005 /s/ Cheryl W. FarmerCheryl W. Farmer, Senior Vice
President  Finance and Treasurer
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 789 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 789

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                           May 3, 2006.
    Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker 
may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XVIII, declare the House resolved into the 
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of the 
bill (H.R. 4954) to improve maritime and cargo security through enhanced layered 
defenses, and for other purposes. The first reading of the bill shall be 
dispensed with. All points of order against consideration of the bill are 
waived. General debate shall be confined to the bill and shall not exceed one 
hour, with 40 minutes equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking 
minority member of the Committee on Homeland Security and 20 minutes equally 
divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the 
Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure. After general debate the bill 
shall be considered for amendment under the five-minute rule. It shall be in 
order to consider as an original bill for the purpose of amendment under the 
five-minute rule the amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the 
Committee on Homeland Security now printed in the bill. The committee amendment 
in the nature of a substitute shall be considered as read. All points of order 
against the committee amendment in the nature of a substitute are waived. 
Notwithstanding clause 11 of rule XVIII, no amendment to the committee amendment 
in the nature of a substitute shall be in order except those printed in the 
report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution. Each such 
amendment may be offered only in the order printed in the report, may be offered 
only by a Member designated in the report, shall be considered as read, shall be 
debatable for the time specified in the report equally divided and controlled by 
the proponent and an opponent, shall not be subject to amendment, and shall not 
be subject to a demand for division of the question in the House or in the 
Committee of the Whole. All points of order against such amendments are waived. 
At the conclusion of consideration of the bill for amendment the Committee shall 
rise and report the bill to the House with such amendments as may have been 
adopted. Any Member may demand a separate vote in the House on any amendment 
adopted in the Committee of the Whole to the bill or to the committee amendment 
in the nature of a substitute. The previous question shall be considered as 
ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to final passage without intervening 
motion except one motion to recommit with or without instructions.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
#### § 175.5 Purpose of this part.

This part establishes a Governmentwide award term for grants and cooperative agreements to implement the requirement in paragraph (g) of section 106 of the Trafficking Victims Protection Act of 2000 (TVPA), as amended (22 U.S.C. 7104(g)).
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Jason
Kulas, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the
period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2013-2 (the Exchange Act periodic reports);

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed
by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports,
the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and

5. All of the reports on
assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance
with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been
disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the
following unaffiliated parties: U.S. Bank National Association.



/s/ Jason KulasName:

Jason KulasTitle:

President and Chief Financial OfficerDate:

March 23, 2015
EXHIBIT 32.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 (AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)





In connection with Quarterly Report of Sionix Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David R. Wells, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to my knowledge and in my capacity as an officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and,


2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.




Date: August 15, 2011


By:
/s/ David R. WellsDavid R. WellsPresident, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary/Treasurer, and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer





A certification furnished pursuant to this Item will not be deemed “filed” for purposes of section 18 of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78r), or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the registrant specifically incorporates it by reference.
### Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA

- 2012

- 0495 Directorate Identifier: 2011

-NM

- 236

- AD If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If they do not, click (or Tab) into and then out of the changed c ell

. **Estimated Costs:**  Action (e.g., Inspection, replacement) Do not include on

condition costs here Costs per **Product** (e.g., aircraft, engine,

propeller, appliance) Work

- h ours (include access, testing, and close

- up) Labor

cost ( @ $8 5 /h our) Part s Cost T otal Costs ( labor + parts) Number of

**U.S. Registered**  **Products** Total Cost

for U

. S

. Fleet

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0. 00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 

### The known number of products in compliance: Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $ 0 

### Costs covered under warranty ( if known ) $
**On**
**- Condition Costs:**  Action (e.g., Inspection, replacement) Work

- h ours

(include access, testing, and close

up) Labor cost

( @ $8 5 /hour) Parts Cost Cost per Product

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 

### Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs) 

### :

### Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”? YES * NO

* Explanation: **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:** Is the AD significant? YES * NO

* Explanation: **Regulatory Flexibility Act:** Will the AD h ave a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? E xplain for either a Yes or No answer. YES NO Explanation: **Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:** This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include speci fic requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? YES NO Explanation:
SERVED: OCTOBER24, 2013 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON,DC
IN THE MATTER OF MULTI-AERO, INC. FAA DOCKETNO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] (Civil Penalty Action) FDMS NO. FAA-2013-0718

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING This proceeding (heretofore designated as CaseNo. 2013CE030017) has been assigned to Administrative LawJudge Richard C. Goodwin. All future pleadings and othercommunications regarding this proceeding shall be served on the Judge, the FAA Hearing Docket, and the other persons onthe attached Service List.

Attachment

- Service List onnie A.

## Yode~ ChiefAdministrativ0awJudge 

## /

### SERVICE LIST ORIGINAL & 

### ONE COPY Fede al Aviation Administration 800 dependence Avenue, S.W. Was 'ngton, DC 20591 Atte tion: HearingDocket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000 1

Sh e Storz, Director ofOperations Mul i-Aero, Inc., Respondent 123 0 Old Tesson Road, Suite 200F St. ouis, MO 63128 Jare M. Allen, Respondent's Counsel The viation Law Finn One Research Court, Suite 450 Roc ville, MD 20850 TE 301-294-8550 F : 301-294-2525 Da id B. Kessler, Complainant's Counsel

### ONE COPY FDMS No. FAA-2013-0718 (Civil Penalty Action)

Dir ctorate Counsel, Office ofRegional Counsel, Central Region, ACE-7 Fed ral Aviation Administration 901 Locust Street, DOT Building, Room 506 K sas City, MO 64106-2641 TE 816-329-3763 F : 816-329-3771 Honorable Richard C. Goodwin,Administrative LawJudge OfIce ofHearings, M-20 U.
. Department ofTransportation 12 0 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) W shington, DC 20590 T 202-366-5121 StaffAssistant F : 202-366-7536

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person orby expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Av ation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000, Washington, D 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

### -2-
§ 820.24 Preliminary notice of violation. ( a ) If the Director has reason to believe a person has violated or is continuing to violate a provision of the Act or a DOE Nuclear Safety Requirement, he may file a Preliminary Notice of Violation. The Notice and any transmittal documents shall contain sufficient information to fairly apprise the respondent of the facts and circumstances of the alleged violations and the basis of any proposed remedy, and to properly indicate what further actions are necessary by or available to respondent.
( b ) Within 30 days after the filing of a Preliminary Notice of Violation, the respondent shall file a reply.
( c ) The reply shall be in writing and signed by the person filing it. The reply shall contain a statement of all relevant facts pertaining to the situation that is the subject of the Notice. The reply shall state any facts, explanations and arguments which support a denial that a violation has occurred as alleged; demonstrate any extenuating circumstances or other reason why the proposed remedy should not be imposed or should be mitigated; and furnish full and complete answers to the questions set forth in the Notice. Copies of all relevant documents shall be submitted with the reply. The reply shall include a discussion of the relevant authorities which support the position asserted, including rulings, regulations, interpretations, and previous decisions issued by DOE.
( d ) The respondent may terminate an enforcement action if the reply agrees to comply with the proposed remedy and waives any right to contest the Notice or the remedy. If a respondent elects this option, the Preliminary Notice of Violation shall be deemed a Final Order upon the filing of the reply.