alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION OF CEO PURSUANT TO SECURITIES
ACT RULES 13a-14 AND 15d-14 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report (report) on Form 10-Q of Del Taco Income Properties
IV;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
 Date: August 11, 2006
    
    /s/ Ronald PowellRonald PowellChief Executive Officer
DuPont Chemicals and Fluoroproducts

Chambers Works

Deepwater, NJ 08023

July xx, 2015

Director, Chemical Control Division

US Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics

EPA East

Room 4146

1201 Constitution Avenue, NW

Washington, DC 20004

Re: EPA – HQ – OPPT – 2003 - 0012

DuPont Chambers Works NJPDES Permit No. NJ0005100

PFOA Data Submittal – Outfall DSN662 Weekly Grab Samples

June 2015 Sample Data

Dear Chemical Control Division:

Attached please find summaries of PFOA analytical results for the DuPont Chambers Works 

weekly grab samples taken at internal outfall DSN662A in June 2015. 

In accordance with the current site NJPDES permit (NJ0005100, effective September 2011), 

these results are provided to NJDEP on a monthly basis via electronic discharge monitoring 

reports. The enclosures include two paper and two electronic copies of the analytical results 

from this monitoring period.

Sincerely, 

Amutha Jeyarajasingam

Area Manager-Secure Environmental Treatment

DuPont Chambers Works

AJ/clc

Enclosures
Copy to:

Document Control Office

US Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics

EPA East

Room 6428

1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW

Washington, DC 20460

Ms. Heather Genievich (cover letter only)

NJDEP Division of Water Quality

Bureau of Surface Water Permitting

Mail Code 401-02B

401 E. State Street

P.O. Box 420

Trenton, NJ 08625-0420
U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE

WASHINGTON : 

1

79–012 2000

106th Congress, 2d Session – – – – – – – – – – – – House Document no. 106–267

REQUEST AND AVAILABILITY OF

EMERGENCY SUPPLEMENTAL FUNDING

COMMUNICATION

FROM

THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES

TRANSMITTING

THE REQUEST AND AVAILABILITY OF THE FUNDS IN ACCORDANCE WITH PROVISIONS OF DIVISION B OF THE H.R. 4425, THE

EMERGENCY SUPPLEMENTAL ACT, 2000, AND DIVISION C OF

H.R. 4425, THE CERRO GRANDE FIRE SUPPLEMENTAL

JULY 17, 2000.—Referred to the Committee on Appropriations and ordered

to be printed
Order entered April 12, 2016

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-00853-CR

SELVIN SANTOS-HERNANDEZ, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 292nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F13-30682-V

ORDER

The reporter’s record was due in this case on September 26, 2015. On November 24, 

2015, we abated the appeal for findings regarding why the record has not been filed. On 

December 11, 2015, we ordered the reporter’s record filed within thirty days. When the record 

was not filed by January 21, 2016, we ordered that the record be filed by February 5, 2016. On 

February 8, 2016, we granted court reporter Robin Washington an extension until March 24, 

2016 to file the record due to complications related to her pregnancy. To date, Ms. Washington 

has neither filed the reporter’s record nor communicated with the Court regarding the status of 

the record.

Accordingly, we ORDER the trial court to make findings regarding the following:
 Whether Ms. Washington has done any work on transcribing the reporter’s record 

in this appeal.

 If Ms. Washington has done work on transcribing the record, the trial court shall 

determine the date by which the record will be filed.

 If the trial court finds that Ms. Washington has not yet begun working on 

transcribing the record, the trial court shall next determine whether Ms. 

Washington is able to work on the record or whether the notes of the proceedings 

should be surrendered to the trial court for transcription by another court reporter.

 If the trial court determines that another court reporter should transcribe the notes, 

the trial court shall provide the name and contract information for that court 

reporter as well as make a finding of the date by which the record will be filed.

We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record containing its findings of fact and any 

orders to this Court within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this order.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order to the Honorable Brandon 

Birmingham, Presiding Judge, 292nd Judicial District Court; court reporter Robin Washington; 

and to counsel for all parties.

We ABATE the appeal to allow the trial court to comply with this order. The appeal shall 

be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are received.

/s/ ADA BROWN 

JUSTICE
#### HARGRAVES, Respondent, v. WICKWIRE STEEL CO., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

January 20, 1915.)

Action by Susan Hargraves, as administratrix, etc., against the Wickwire Steel Company.

No opinion. Judgment and order affirmed with costs.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-6865
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus JIMMY LAWRENCE NANCE, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge. (CR-92-135, CA-97-399-R) Submitted: September 25, 1997 Decided: October 9, 1997 Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.Jimmy Lawrence Nance, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Linn Eckert, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying without prejudice his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we denya certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Nance , Nos. CR-92- 135; CA-97- 399-R (W.D. Va. June 5, 1997). We deny Appellant's motion to consolidate and dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### § 95.27 Protection while in use.

While in use, classified matter must be under the direct control of an authorized individual to preclude physical, audio, and visual access by persons who do not have the prescribed access authorization or other written CSA disclosure authorization (see § 95.36 for additional information concerning disclosure authorizations).

[64 FR 15651, Apr. 1, 1999]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 2 4 - 0263 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellant, v. THOMAS JOSEPH BRENNAN,

Defendant and Appellee. **ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 30 - day extension of time , and good cause appearing therefor, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellee is granted an extension of time to and including September 27 , 2024, within which to prepare, serve, and file his response brief.

Electronically signed by: Bowen Greenwood Clerk of the Supreme Court August 28 2024

08/28/2024

Case Number: DA 24-0263
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.1

       CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Thian Hoo Tan, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Komag, Incorporated;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial
information included in this report fairly present, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a - 15(e) and 15d - 15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors:

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize, and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

         DATE: August 9, 2004            BY: /s/ Thian Hoo Tan
                                                 ---------------------

                                                 Thian Hoo Tan
                                                 Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           6,900
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  104,100
<ALLOWANCES>                                     7,400
<INVENTORY>                                     73,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               206,300
<PP&E>                                       1,053,900
<DEPRECIATION>                                 463,400
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 913,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          121,000
<BONDS>                                        704,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       174,700
<OTHER-SE>                                   (114,600)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   913,000
<SALES>                                        577,400
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               577,400
<CGS>                                          534,300
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  595,800
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   800
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              60,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (79,200)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (31,100)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (48,100)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (7,700)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (55,800)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.06)
        

</TABLE>
#### H. G. VOGEL CO., Appellant, v. GEORGE BACKER CONST. CO., Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

January 29, 1915.)

Action by the H. G. Vogel Company against the George Backer Construction Company.

D. Bernstein, of New York City, for appellant. S. Levy, of New York City, for respondent.

No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs. Order filed.
Editorial Note on Part 51
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 51 appear at 80 FR 74980, Dec. 1, 2015.

§ 51.121 Status of NEPA actions. Individuals or organizations desiring information on the NRC's NEPA process or on the status of specific NEPA actions should address inquiries to: ( a ) *Utilization facilities:* ATTN: Document Control Desk, Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001, telephone (301) 415-1270, e-mail *RidsNrrOd@nrc.gov .*
( b ) *Production facilities:* ATTN: Document Control Desk, Director, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001, telephone (301) 415-7800, e-mail *RidsNmssOd@nrc.gov .*
( c ) *Materials licenses:* ATTN: Document Control Desk, Director, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001, telephone (301) 415-7800, e-mail *RidsNmssOd@nrc.gov .*
( d ) *Rulemaking:* ATTN: Chief, Regulatory Analysis and Rulemaking Support Branch, Division of Rulemaking, Environmental, and Financial Support, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001, telephone (800) 368-5642.
( e ) *General environmental matters:* Executive Director for Operations, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555, Telephone: (301) 415-1700.
[53 FR 13399, Apr. 25, 1988, as amended at 60 FR 24552, May 9, 1995; 68 FR 58811, Oct. 10, 2003; 73 FR 5724, Jan. 31, 2008; 77 FR 39907, July 6, 2012; 84 FR 65645, Nov. 29, 2019]
#### In the Matter of Marilyn Rapp, Respondent, v. Christopher Birch, Appellant.

Two orders of the Family Court, Suffolk County, dated September 3, 1968 and December 6, 1968, respectively, affirmed, with one bill of costs. In our opinion, the evidence in this paternity proceeding was sufficient to create a genuine belief in the mind of the trier of the facts that appellant is the father of the child *(Commissioner of Public Welfare*v. Ryan, 238 App. Div. 607, 608; see *People*v. *Arcieri,*8 A D 2d 923; *People*v. *Mendel,*10 A D 2d 767). Rabin, Acting P. J., Benjamin, Munder, Martuscello and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.
**Departamento de Asuntos de Veteranos**

***Programa de Asistencia Educativa Para Veteranos Post-Vietnam (VEAP) - Capítulo 32***

# ¿Qué es VEAP?

El programa de asistencia educativa para veteranos post-Vietnam (VEAP) es un beneficio de educación para veteranos que pagaron VEAP mientras estaban en servicio.  Los veteranos elegibles pueden tener derecho hasta 36 meses de entrenamiento.  La elegibilidad normalmente termina 10 años después de darse de baja del servicio, pero el tiempo límite puede ser más largo en ciertos casos. Los veteranos elegibles pueden dedicarse a cualquiera de los siguientes tipos de entrenamiento:

***Nota***:  VA no aprueba escuelas o programas para beneficios.  Cada estado aprueba individualmente escuelas y cursos.  Para averiguar si su escuela o programa está aprobado para los beneficios educativos de VA bajo VEAP, póngase en contacto con el oficial de certificación de VA de su escuela o llame a VA al número gratis a continuación.

# ¿Quién es Elegible?

Para establecer la elegibilidad a VEAP, usted debe

· haber entrado por primera vez el servicio activo después del 31 de diciembre de 1976 y antes del 1 de Julio de 1985, ***Y***

· contribuido a VEAP antes del 1 de abril de 1987, ***Y***

· completado su primer período de servicio, ***Y***

· haber recibido la baja de servicio bajo condiciones honorables.

***Nota***:  Puede que usted sea elegible para beneficios de educación si usted está todavía en activo, llame al número gratis a continuación por detalles acerca de su elegibilidad para VEAP o para averiguar si puede cambiar al Montgomery GI Bill. 

# ¿Qué Paga VA ?

La cantidad total de dólares de sus beneficios es la suma de:

· Sus contribuciones totales,  ***MAS***

· Fondos de contrapartida de VA equivalentes a 2 veces sus contribuciones, ***MAS***

· Cualquier contribución DOD o "kickers"

La cantidad mensual que recibirá está basada en el total (anterior), el número de meses que contribuyó, el tipo de entrenamiento que persigue, y su tiempo de entrenamiento (ej. jornada completa, media jornada, etc).

**Nota**:  Las contribuciones pueden ser reembolsables.  Por favor, llame al número gratis a continuación para más información.

# ¿Cómo Puede Presentar su Solicitud ?

Cuando encuentre un programa aprobado para entrenamiento VA, usted puede solicitar VEAP completando el formulario 22-1990 de VA, *Solicitud para beneficios de educación*.  Usted también puede presentar su solicitud en Internet a través de nuestro sitio web en http://vabenefits.vba.va.gov/vonapp*.*

# Beneficios Relacionados

Programa de trabajo-estudioAsistencia tutelar

*VEAP* no contribuyente (Sec. 903)Reembolso de contribuciones

# Para más información, llame gratis al 1-888-GIBILL-1 (1-888-442-4551)

**o visite nuestro sitio web en****http://www.gibill.va.gov****.**

Servicio de Educación – Abril 2006
Califican.

No califican.

¿Y sus clientes calificarán para el EITC?
Le presentamos la mejor manera para averiguarlo.

No pase por alto la elegibilidad de sus clientes para reclamar el Crédito por Ingreso del Trabajo (EITC).

Asegúrese que apliquen únicamente los clientes calificados para el EITC. Repase los nuevos requisitos

para el año fiscal 2003, y asegúrese de evitar los errores que se listan a continuación al momento de

ayudar a sus clientes calificados a preparar sus reclamos para el EITC.

Para reclamar el EITC, los contribuyentes

deben cumplir con los siguientes requisitos:

• Haber tenido ingresos del trabajo

• Tener un número válido del Seguro Social

• Ingreso por inversiones limitado a $2,600

• Su estado civil para efectos de la declaración 

no puede ser “casado(a), presentando su

declaración por separado”

• Generalmente, haber sido ciudadano(a) o 

residente permanente de los Estados Unidos

durante todo el año

• No puede ser un hijo(a) calificado(a) de 

otra persona

• No puede presentar la Forma 2555 ó la Forma

2555-EZ (relacionado con los ingresos 

provenientes del extranjero)

Criterio para la calificación de hijos(as)

Un hijo(a) calificado(a) no puede ser reclamado

por más de una persona para el EITC.

Ese hijo(a) debe cumplir con los requisitos de

parentesco, edad y residencia.

Si usted no tiene un hijo(a):

• Debe tener por lo menos 25 años y ser menor

de 65 años 

• No puede calificar como dependiente de 

otra persona

• Debe haber vivido en los Estados Unidos por

más de la mitad del año fiscal

Forma correcta de reportar sus ingresos

Usted debe haber trabajado y haber recibido

ingresos menores a:

• $11,230 ($12,230 si es casado(a) y declara 

conjuntamente) si no tiene un hijo(a)

calificado(a), ó

• $29,666 ($30,666 si es casado(a) y declara 

conjuntamente) si tiene un hijo(a) calificado(a), ó

• $33,692 ($34,692 si es casado(a) y declara 

conjuntamente) si tiene más de un 

hijo(a) calificado(a)

Estado civil para efectos de la declaración

No puede estar casado(a) y presentar su

declaración por separado.

Errores comunes que debe evitar

• Los contribuyentes reclaman un hijo(a) que no

es un hijo(a) calificado(a)

• Contribuyentes casados que deben presentar su

declaración como “casados declarando por 

separado”, presentan su declaración como

“soltero(a)” o “jefe de familia” (head 

of household)

• Errores al reportar los ingresos

• Contribuyentes o hijos(as) calificados(as) con

números de Seguro Social incorrectos 

Para más información sobre el EITC, visite www.eitcfortaxpreparers.com

para utilizar el Kit de Herramientas Electrónico de Preparación de Impuestos

(Tax Preparer Electronic Toolkit).

O llame al 1-800-860-4259 para comunicarse con un representante del IRS.

Internal Revenue Service

www.irs.gov/eitc

Publication 4257 SP Catalog Number 37900P (12-2003)

Requisitos para el Crédito por Ingreso del Trabajo 2003
2007-1802.

#### State v. Clay.

Cuyahoga App. No. 88823, 2007-Ohio-4295. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated in the court of appeals’ Journal Entry filed September 12, 2007:

“Whether knowledge of the pending indictment is required for a conviction for having a weapon while under disability pursuant to R.C. 2923.13(A)(3) when the disability is based on a pending indictment.”

O’Donnell, J., dissents.

The conflict case is *State v. Burks*(June 22, 1990), Sandusky App. No. S-89-13.

Sua sponte, cause consolidated with 2007-1852, *State v. Clay,*Cuyahoga App. No. 88823, 2007-Ohio-4295.