alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 1800.1 Authority.

The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) awards grants and cooperative agreements under the authority of 51 U.S.C. 20113 (e), the National Aeronautics and Space Act. This part 1800 is issued under the authority of 51 U.S.C. 20113 (e), Pub. L. 97-258, 96 Stat. 1003 (31 U.S.C. 6301 *et seq.*), and 2 CFR part 200.
#### In the Matter of East New York Savings Bank et al., Petitioners, v. J. Edward Conway et al., Constituting the New York State Human Rights Appeal Board, Respondents, and Cleveland Hanchard, Intervenor-Respondent.

Determination of State Human Rights Appeal Board unanimously confirmed, without costs and without disbursements, and the petition dismissed. In so deciding, we do not indicate any opinion as to the merits of the complaint. Concur—Capozzoli, J. P., Markewich, Steuer and Tilzer, JJ.
#### § 170.307 Foreign organization.

*Foreign organization* has the meaning given in 2 CFR 200.1.

[85 FR 49526, Aug. 13, 2020]
### Onslow County DJI Inspire 1 EMERGENCY PROCEDURES In the event of a flyaway, we will immediately contact the appropriate Air traffic Control Facility via Radio or phone and alert them to the last know location of the UAS, altitude, direction of flight and remaining flight time. (Listed on page 2) The DJI Inspire 1 comes with lost link software that allows the UAS to return to its original “Take off point” or until it regains signal with the user remote. The USA will return to home with the prescribed return altitude. This altitude is usually set at 100 ft AGL. This will avoid all trees or obstructions in the surrounding are if the return to base option is need. Part of the initial Pre-flight safety checking for heights of nearby obstructions. This will be done by first getting to altitude of highest obstructions and rotating 30 degrees and asses your highest point. Then PIC will set above the highest obstruction for the altitude return to home.

Accident/Incident Notification If UAS is lost, the crew will attempt to locate the downed aircraft and request help from the Onslow County Emergency Services. The crew will write a detailed description of the event for Onslow County flight safety and the FAA. The flight the crew will inform the Sheriff of any abnormalities. If the UAS crashes and damages any property or anyone is injured the crew will assess the situation.

o Maintain personal safety

o Care for or request medical care for any injured parties.

o Notify any applicable law enforcement agencies

o Write down exactly what happened and be ready to file a report with the FAA If electrical power loss occurs, the PIC will initiate a fail-safe mission abort procedure and immediately notify the local ATC. DJI Inspire 1 discrepancies will be written up in the aircraft forms and records. Information will be passed to the FAA and the manufacturer, if necessary. All FAA accident/ incident notification procedures will be followed as required.

# Local Air Traffic Control
Marine Corps Air Station New River *Base Ops (910) 449-6316 or 449 6311 Tower Freq. 120.00000

Albert J. Ellis Airport *(910) 324-1100 or 989-3168 (No tower) Freq. 153.90500

Wilmington International Airport *Tower (910) 815-4504 Freq. 121.50000

Marine Corps Air Station Cherry Point *Base Ops (252) 466-2233 Freq.121.30000

Marine Corps Auxiliary Landing Field (MCALF) Bogue *Base Ops (252) 466-0674 Freq. 126.450000 Onslow County Sheriff (910) 455-3113

Onslow County Emergency Services (910) 347-4270
§ 1136.100 Purpose of OAR Article I. OAR Article I sets forth requirements for recipients to maintain current information about themselves in the data system the Federal Government specifies as the repository for standard information about its business partners, currently the System for Award Management. The article thereby implements OMB guidance in: ( a ) 2 CFR 200.113 and 200.210(b)(1)(iii);
( b ) 2 CFR part 25; and
( c ) The portion of 2 CFR 200.300(b) that cites 2 CFR part 25 and the System for Award Management).
§ 1108.260 Nonprofit organization. *Nonprofit organization* means any corporation, trust, association, cooperative, or other organization, not including an institution of higher education, that: ( a ) Is operated primarily for scientific, educational, service, charitable, or similar purposes in the public interest;
( b ) Is not organized primarily for profit; and
( c ) Uses net proceeds to maintain, improve, or expand the operations of the organization.
Form of Stock Option Grant for Members of the Board of Directors



 Exhibit 10.1 
 [date] 
 [Form of Stock Option Grant for members of the Board of Directors] 
 Dear [name]: 
 Pursuant to the terms and conditions of Adolor Corporation’s 2003 Stock-Base Incentive Compensation Plan (the ‘Plan’), I am pleased to advise you of your
annual grant of a Non-Qualified Stock Option to purchase [number] shares (the ‘Option’) of common stock as outlined below: 
  

					
	Grant Date:	  	[date]	  	
			
	Option Price per Share:	  	$[price]	  	Total Cost to Exercise: $[total price]                        
			
	Expiration Date:	  	[date]	  	
		
	Vesting Schedule:	  	100% of the Option shall vest on [date]; provided, however, that if prior [date], you resign from the Board of Directors of the Corporation other than for Cause (as defined in the
Plan), the vesting of the Option shall accelerate so that the Option becomes immediately exercisable with respect to one twelfth (1/12) of the shares underlying such Option for each full month that has elapsed between the date of grant and the date
of such resignation and provided further, however, that none of the Option shall vest if such resignation from the Board of Directors of the Corporation was for Cause.

 You may elect at any time while on the Board of Directors of Adolor Corporation to exercise in full all of the
shares subject to this Option prior to the vesting of the Option. Any such shares purchased prior to their vesting: (i) shall vest in accordance with the vesting schedule otherwise applicable to the Option; and (ii) shall be subject to a
repurchase right in favor of Adolor Corporation in the event of a termination of service as set forth in Section 8 of the Plan (a “Termination Event”). The repurchase right of Adolor Corporation shall be for any unvested shares and
shall be at a price equal to the lesser of (x) the exercise price of such shares, or (y) the Fair Market Value of such shares on the date of repurchase, which right must be exercised by Adolor Corporation within 90 days of the Termination
Event; provided that if Adolor Corporation does not exercise such repurchase right within such 90-day period, the Option shall become fully and immediately vested. 
 Kindly execute this letter as below and return it to me in the envelope provided. I have also enclosed a summary of the Adolor Corporation’s 2003 Stock-Based Compensation Plan, its Summary Description and the Company’s latest
annual report (SEC Form 10-K), and a copy of the grant for your records. 
 We thank you for your many contributions to the
Company, and look forward to working with you over the next year. 
 Sincerely, 
 Chief Financial Officer 
 I hereby
acknowledge receipt of the Stock Option granted on the date shown above, which has been issued to me under the terms and conditions of the Plan. 
  

							
	Signature:	  	  
	  	Date	  	  

		  	 [Director Name]
###### Editorial Note on Part 70

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 70 appear at 81 FR 86910, Dec. 2, 2016.

#### § 70.34 Amendment of licenses.

Applications for amendment of a license shall be filed in accordance with § 70.21(a) and shall specify the respects in which the licensee desires his license to be amended and the grounds for such amendment.
Exhibit 35.3a



|     |                    |                  
|---- | ------------------ | -----------------
|LOGO |                    | 1 Corelogic Drive
|     | Westlake, TX 76262

SERVICER COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION

This Servicer Compliance Certification is issued pursuant to the Tax Outsourcing Agreement dated as of May 28, 2009 (together with all amendments
thereto, the Agreement), between Cenlar FSB (Bank) and CoreLogic Tax Services, LLC (CoreLogic).

I, Vicki Chenault, an
authorized officer of CoreLogic, certify to Bank and with the knowledge and intent that it will rely upon this certification, that:

1.
The servicing information required to be provided to Bank by CoreLogic under the Agreement has been so provided;

2. I am responsible for
reviewing the activities performed by CoreLogic under the Agreement and, based upon my knowledge and in all material respects throughout the relevant reporting period, CoreLogic has fulfilled its obligations under the Agreement.

3. Attached to this Servicer Compliance Certification is a list of all material failures and the nature and status thereof. [NONE/NO
ATTACHMENT]



|                            |  |                      
|--------------------------- |  | ---------------------
|CORELOGIC TAX SERVICES, LLC
|                            | 
|By:                         |  | /s/ Vicki Chenault   
|                            |  | Vicki Chenault       
|                            |  | Senior Vice President
|                            |  | February 11, 2016
IV 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 786 

Condemning the recent election of the Iranian Ambassador to the United 

Nations to the position of Vice-chair of the United Nations Disarmament 

Commission. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 27, 2006 

Mr. RYUN of Kansas (for himself, Mr. TANCREDO, Mr. MCCAUL of Texas, Mr. 

MCCOTTER, Mr. SCHWARZ of Michigan, Mr. DOOLITTLE, and Mr. 

FOLEY) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on International Relations 

RESOLUTION 

Condemning the recent election of the Iranian Ambassador 

to the United Nations to the position of Vice-chair of 

the United Nations Disarmament Commission. 

Whereas Iran reportedly is accelerating its nuclear weapons 

program and claims to have mastered the technology for 

uranium enrichment; 

Whereas the United Nations Security Council has noted 

‘‘with serious concern Iran’s resumption of uranium enrichment-related activities and its suspension of cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency 

(IAEA)’’ and underlined the importance of Iran re-establishing ‘‘full and sustained suspension of all enrichmentVerDate Aug 31 2005 19:41 Apr 30, 2006 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6300 E:\BILLS\HR786.IH HR786

jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 786 IH 

related and reprocessing activities, including research and 

development’’; 

Whereas Iran has suspended its cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA); 

Whereas on April 10, 2006, the United Nations Disarmament Commission elected the Iranian Ambassador to 

the United Nations as one of its Vice-chairs; 

Whereas the United Nations Disarmament Commission exists 

to promote disarmament and nuclear non-proliferation; 

and 

Whereas Iran’s election as one of the Vice-chairs of the 

United Nations Disarmament Commission may further 

undermine the Commission from effectively addressing 

nuclear threats: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives con2 demns the United Nations Disarmament Commission’s 

3 election of the Iranian Ambassador to the United Nations 

4 to the position of Vice-chair of the Commission. 

Æ 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
<PAGE>



                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2


      CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                       OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of SEDONA Corporation on Form
10-QSB for the quarter ending June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Quarterly Report"), I, Anita M.
Primo, Chief Financial Officer of SEDONA Corporation certify, pursuant Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
SEDONA Corporation.


Dated:  August 14, 2006            /s/ ANITA M. PRIMO
                                   --------------------------------------------
                                   Anita M. Primo
                                   Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
                                   (Principal Financial Officer)
Page 1 of 1 

Department of Defense Comments on the Revised Draft Toxicological Review of Hexachloro

Comments submitted by: Chemical Material Risk Management Directorate 

 Organization: Department of Defense Date Submitted: 25 March 20

*Comment categories: Science or methods (S); Editorial, grammar/spelling, clarifications needed (E); or Other (O). Also please inoutcome, conclusions or implementation of the assessment. 

Comment 

No. Section 

Page & 

Paragraph 

(enter Global 

if report 

section-wide) 

Comment Suggested Action, R

 and References (if n

1 Global The revisions made to the Toxicological Review 

for Hexachloroethane improved the clarity of the document, the rationale for the approach taken in the risk assessment is much clearer. However, we still do not agree that the kidney toxicity exhibited in male rats is predictive of toxic 

effects that may be seen in humans. It is unfortunate that the analysis used to determine that 

there is insufficient evidence to support an alpha 2μ-globulin-related mode of action per the 1991 EPA publication Alpha2u-Globulin: Association with Chemically Induced Renal Toxicity and Neoplasia in the Male Rat had to make that determination due to insufficiency that stems from data gaps. We would also like to point out that Table A-1 in this same publication includes hexachloroethane as substances that cause kidney tumors by an alpha2u-globulin-mediated 

mechanism; we are unsure why this publication made this determination whereas the toxicological review does not. 

We believe that the charge qupeer review are adequate to inremaining issues will be addreround of review.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 34 (Monday, February 22, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 7598-7599]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-3281]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Notice of Proposals to Engage in Permissible Nonbanking 
Activities or to Acquire Companies that are Engaged in Permissible 
Nonbanking Activities

    The companies listed in this notice have given notice under section 
4 of the Bank Holding Company Act (12 U.S.C. 1843) (BHC Act) and 
Regulation Y (12 CFR Part 225) to engage de novo, or to

[[Page 7599]]

acquire or control voting securities or assets of a company, including 
the companies listed below, that engages either directly or through a 
subsidiary or other company, in a nonbanking activity that is listed in 
Sec. [thinsp]225.28 of Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.28) or that the Board 
has determined by Order to be closely related to banking and 
permissible for bank holding companies. Unless otherwise noted, these 
activities will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Each notice is available for inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank 
indicated. The notice also will be available for inspection at the 
offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their 
views in writing on the question whether the proposal complies with the 
standards of section 4 of the BHC Act. Additional information on all 
bank holding companies may be obtained from the National Information 
Center website at www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding the applications must be 
received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of 
Governors not later than March 8, 2010.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (Colette A. Fried, Assistant 
Vice President) 230 South LaSalle Street, Chicago, Illinois 60690-1414:
    1. Ida Grove Bancshares, Inc., Ida Grove, Iowa; to continue to 
engage de novo in leasing personal or real property, pursuant to 
section 225.28(b)(3) of Regulation Y.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, February 16, 
2010.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2010-3281 Filed 2-19-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-S
<TABLE> <S> <C>
 
<ARTICLE>      5 
<LEGEND>       THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
               FROM THE ACCOMPANYING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN
               ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>   1,000 
       
<S>                                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                        3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                    JAN-03-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                       JUN-29-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                         SEP-27-1998
<CASH>                                                   66,668
<SECURITIES>                                             59,950
<RECEIVABLES>                                            40,964
<ALLOWANCES>                                              2,899
<INVENTORY>                                              30,822
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                        239,359
<PP&E>                                                  919,325
<DEPRECIATION>                                          429,234
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                          736,415
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                   317,869
<BONDS>                                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                         0
<PREFERRED>                                                   0
<COMMON>                                                    534
<OTHER-SE>                                              339,184
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                            736,415
<SALES>                                                  81,314
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         81,314
<CGS>                                                    84,117
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            84,117
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         19,166
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                            301
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                        4,763
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                         (23,901)
<INCOME-TAX>                                                256
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                     (27,449)
<DISCONTINUED>                                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                               0
<CHANGES>                                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                            (27,449)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                            ($0.51)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            ($0.51)

         

</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                             STRATEX NETWORKS, INC.

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the periodic report of Stratex Networks, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Carl A. Thomsen, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely
for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code,
that to the best of my knowledge:

        (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
        15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

        (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
        material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
        the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.





Date: November 14, 2002                            /s/ Carl A. Thomsen
                                                   -----------------------------
                                                   Carl A. Thomsen
                                                   Chief Financial Officer
### ATTACHMENT HEADER SHEET
Attachment Number 005 Attachment Name DMP process description 

### Associated PMN Section Number Pt.2, Sec.A, id. Does not contain CBI



### Report Number DMP_101 122926607598

### Substance: 3,4-Dimethylpyrazol (DMP) CAS #2820-37-3 Diagram of the major unit operation steps

SIMPORT of 3,4-Dimethylpyrazol (liquid formulation, containing 72 %DMP,

20% water and 8% Phosphoric acid)
#### § 810.13 Additional information.

DOE may at any time require a person engaging in any generally or specifically authorized activity to submit additional information.
§ 20.2102 Records of radiation protection programs. ( a ) Each licensee shall maintain records of the radiation protection program, including: ( 1 ) The provisions of the program; and
( 2 ) Audits and other reviews of program content and implementation.
( b ) The licensee shall retain the records required by paragraph (a)(1) of this section until the Commission terminates each pertinent license requiring the record. The licensee shall retain the records required by paragraph (a)(2) of this section for 3 years after the record is made.