alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# United Stat es Court of A ppeals For the First C ircuit

No. 03-2415 SAMANTHA J. COMFORT, ETC., ET AL., Plaintiffs, Appellants,

v. LYNN SCHOOL COMMITTEE ET AL., Defendants, Appellees.

ERRATA SHEET The opinion of this Court issued on October 20, 2004 is corrected as follows: On page 4, line 9, change "claim" to "claims" On page 4, line 10, insert "and Title VI" after "1983" On page 20, line 7, insert "and Title VI" after both instances of "1983"; change "claim" to "claims" On page 20, line 10, insert after "claims" (both in the traditional sense and in the sense that they have been presented to this court without sufficiently developed argumentation) On page 48, line 17 — insert "and Title VI" after 1983; change "claim" to "claims"; insert footnote 12 signal after "claims." to read: We note that "[d]iscrimination that violates the Equal Protection Clause . . . committed by an institution that accepts federal funds also constitutes a violation of Title VI." Gratz , 539 U.S. at 276 n.23. It follows, then, that the denial of school transfers based on race violates both Title VI as well as section 1983.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          71,234
<SECURITIES>                                       400
<RECEIVABLES>                                   25,818
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                97,452
<PP&E>                                       3,011,349
<DEPRECIATION>                                 687,859
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,420,942
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,535
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,279,454
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,420,942
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                71,838
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   33,566
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 38,272
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             38,272
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    38,272
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.23
        

</TABLE>
#### PEOPLE ex rel. BUCK, Respondent, v. WILLIAMS, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

December 11, 1914.)

Proceeding by the People - of the State of New York, on the relation of John S. Buck, against William Williams, as Commissioner of the Department of Water Supply, etc.

No opinion. Motion for reargument (of 148 N. Y. Supp. 1136) granted, and case set down for the first Monday of the January term, 1915.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

October 27, 2021

No. 04

- 21

- 00404

- CV

Fernando GUERRA, Appellant

v.

Debra GUERRA , Ebra Trejo, and Michael Reyes, Appellees

From the 407th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018

- CI

- 14451 Honorable John D. Gabriel, Jr. , Judge Presiding



### ORDER

The clerk’s record was due to be filed with this court on October 2 2 , 2021. See T EX . R.

A PP . P. 35.1. After the due date, the Bexar County District Clerk notified this court that Appellant has not paid the clerk’s fee for preparing the record and Appellant is not entitled to a

free clerk’s record.

We ORDER Appellant to provide written proof to this court within TEN DAYS of the date of this order that (1) the clerk’s fee has been paid or arrangements have been made to pay the clerk’s fee, or (2) Appellant is entitled to appeal without paying the clerk’s fee. See id. R.

20.1. If Appellant fails t o respond as ordered, this appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution without further notice. See id. R. 37.3(b).

_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, JusticeIN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 27th day of October, 2021

.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Clerk of Court
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and § 225.41 of the Board's Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).

The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must be received not later than January 7, 2011.

A. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (Dennis Denney, Assistant Vice President) 1 Memorial Drive, Kansas City, Missouri 64198-0001:

                    1.                     *Tribble Family Partners, L.P.; Vera Tribble, general partner; David Tribble, limited partner; all of Unionville, Missouri; and Diana Bennett, limited partner, Bethany, Missouri,*                     to retain shares of Northern Missouri Bancshares, Inc., parent of Farmers Bank of Northern Missouri, National Association, both in Unionville, Missouri.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, December 16, 2010.

Robert deV. Frierson,

Deputy Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2010-31990 Filed 12-20-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
#### § 1134.3 Exceptions from requirements of this part.

Exceptions are permitted from the administrative requirements in this part only as described at 2 CFR 1126.3.
Editorial Note on Part 72
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 72 appear at 80 FR 74981, Dec. 1, 2015, and at 81 FR 86910, Dec. 2, 2016.

§ 72.78 Nuclear material transaction reports. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, whenever the licensee transfers or receives or adjusts the inventory, in any manner, of special nuclear material as specified by § 74.15 and/or source material as specified by § 40.64 of this chapter, the licensee shall complete in computer-readable format a Nuclear Material Transaction Report as specified in the instructions in NUREG/BR-0006 and NMMSS Report D-24, “Personal Computer Data Input for NRC Licensees.” Copies of these instructions may be obtained either by writing to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Division of Fuel Management, Washington, DC 20555-0001, or by e-mail to *RidsNmssFcss@nrc.gov .* Each licensee who transfers the material shall submit a Nuclear Material Transaction Report in computer-readable format as specified in the instructions no later than the close of business the next working day. Each licensee who receives the material shall submit a Nuclear Material Transaction Report in computer-readable format in accordance with instructions within ten (10) days after the material is received. Each ISFSI licensee who receives spent fuel from a foreign source shall complete both the supplier's and the receiver's portion of the Nuclear Material Transaction Report, verify the identity of the spent fuel, and indicate the results on the receiver's portion of the form. These prescribed computer-readable forms replace the DOE/NRC Form 741 which have been previously submitted in paper form.
( b ) Any licensee who is required to submit Nuclear Material Transactions Reports pursuant to § 75.34 of this chapter (pertaining to implementation of the US/IAEA Safeguards Agreement) shall prepare and submit the reports only as provided in that section instead of as provided in paragraph (a) of this section.
[59 FR 35621, July 13, 1994, as amended at 66 FR 51841, Oct. 11, 2001; 68 FR 58819, Oct. 10, 2003; 73 FR 32463, June 9, 2008; 79 FR 75741, Dec. 19, 2014; 84 FR 65646, Nov. 29, 2019]
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 97 

To amend the Consolidated and Further Continuing Appropriations Act, 

2016, to enable the payment of certain officers and employees of the 

United States whose employment is authorized under the Deferred Action 

for Childhood Arrivals program, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 3, 2017 

Ms. BROWNLEY of California introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on House Administration 

A BILL 

To amend the Consolidated and Further Continuing Appropriations Act, 2016, to enable the payment of certain 

officers and employees of the United States whose employment is authorized under the Deferred Action for 

Childhood Arrivals program, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘American Dream Em5 ployment Act of 2017’’. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 97 IH

1 SEC. 2. CERTAIN FEDERAL EMPLOYEES WHO ARE BENE2 FICIARIES OF DACA AUTHORIZED TO BE 

3 PAID. 

4 Section 704 of title VII of division E of the Consoli5 dated Appropriations Act, 2016 (Public Law 114–113) is 

6 amended— 

7 (1) by striking ‘‘eligible; or’’ and inserting ‘‘eli8 gible;’’; and 

9 (2) by striking the semicolon after ‘‘owes alle10 giance to the United States’’ and inserting the fol11 lowing: ‘‘; or (5) is a person who is employed by the 

12 House of Representatives or the Senate, and has 

13 been issued an employment authorization document 

14 under the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals 

15 Program of the Secretary of Homeland Security, es16 tablished pursuant to the memorandum from the 

17 Secretary of Homeland Security entitled ‘Exercising 

18 Prosecutorial Discretion with Respect to Individuals 

19 Who Came to the United States as Children’, dated 

20 June 15, 2012:’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
§ 1120.3 DoD Component implementation. Each DoD Component that awards grants or cooperative agreements must: ( a ) Conform the format of its awards to the standard format established by this part no later than [18 months after the effective date of the final rule].
( b ) Update electronic systems it maintains for generating awards within 18 months of the issuance of a new or updated DoD form for the award cover pages, in order to implement that form in those systems, unless it has an approved deviation in accordance with § 1120.110.
226 So.2d 526

#### STATE of Louisiana v. Louis Harrison BENNETT.

No. 50150.

Oct. 1, 1969.

In re: Louis Harrison Bennett applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition and mandamus and in the alternative a writ of habeas corpus.

Applications denied. The application for writ of habeas corpus admits defendant is held under indictment. His application for other writs is based upon the overruling of the motion to quash that indictment. His relief is by appeal if there is a conviction and all errors now urged may then be reviewed by this court.
###### Editorial Note on Part 180

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 180 appear at 79 FR 75879, Dec. 19, 2014.

#### § 180.35 By when must a Federal agency implement these guidelines?

Federal agencies must submit proposed regulations to the OMB for review within nine months of the issuance of these guidelines and issue final regulations within eighteen months of these guidelines.
#### § 1108.355 Subaward.

*Subaward* means a legal instrument by which a recipient or subrecipient at any tier transfers—for performance by an entity at the next lower tier—a portion of the substantive program for which the DoD Component made an award.
#### BARCLAY v. HENRY W. SAVAGE, Inc.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department.

December 24, 1914.)

Master and Servant (§ 30*)—Discharge of Servant—Grounds—Misconduct of Servant.

An employé, maliciously cutting and tearing to pieces theatrical costumes of a coemployé, may be discharged by the employer.

[Ed. Note.—For other cases, see Master and Servant, Cent. Dig. §§ 30-36; Dec. Dig. § 30.*]

Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Third District. •

Action by Lila Barclay against' Henry W. Savage, Incorporated. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. Reversed, and new trial ordered.

Argued December term, 1914, before GUY, BIJUR, and PAGE, JJ.

Reynolds, Thomas & Friedman, of New York City (A. C. Thomas, of New York City, of counsel), for appellant.

Charles Fox, of New York City (Edward H. Lockwood, of New York City, of counsel), for respondent.

*

For other cases see same topic & § number in Dec. & Am. Digs. 1907 to date, & Rep’r Indexes

PER CURIAM.

The defendant appeals from a judgment in favor of plaintiff, brought to recover damages for breach of contract of employment. The answer pleads justification, and the defendant at the trial introduced convincing proof that plaintiff was discharged because, while in defendant’s employment, she maliciously cut and tore to pieces certain theatrical costumes belonging to another actress in the employ of defendant. The preponderance of evidence on this point is so entirely in favor of the defendant that we feel it our duty to set aside the judgment and order a new trial.

Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.
EPA SANITIZED Page 1 of 5
EPA SANITIZED Page 2 of 5
 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 3 of 5
EPA SANITIZED Page 4 of 5
EPA SANITIZED Page 5 of 5
**Exhibit 31.2**
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Cheryl W. Farmer, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Greyhound Lines,Inc. and Subsidiaries; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand have:
 a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, asof the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s boardof directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reporting whichare reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.
Date: May 17, 2004                                                          /s/ Cheryl W. Farmer   Cheryl W. Farmer, Senior Vice President -  Finance
#### § 1200.220 What contracts and subcontracts, in addition to those listed in 2 CFR 180.220, are covered transactions?

In addition to the contracts covered under 2 CFR 180.220(b) of the OMB guidance, this part applies to any contract, regardless of tier, that is awarded by a contractor, subcontractor, supplier, consultant, or its agent or representative in any transaction, if the contract is to be funded or provided by the Department of Transportation under a covered nonprocurement transaction and the amount of the contract is expected to equal or exceed $25,000. This extends the coverage of the Department of Transportation nonprocurement suspension and debarment requirements to all lower tiers of subcontracts under covered nonprocurement transactions, as permitted under the OMB guidance at 2 CFR 180.220(c) (see optional lower-tier coverage in the figure in the appendix to 2 CFR part 180).
120 STAT. 2704 PUBLIC LAW 109–393—DEC. 13, 2006

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 4377 (S. 2035):

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 109–684 (Comm. on Energy and Commerce).

SENATE REPORTS: No. 109–304 accompanying S. 2035 (Comm. on Energy and

Natural Resources).

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 152 (2006):

Sept. 26, considered and passed House.

Nov. 16, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 109–393

109th Congress

An Act

To extend the time required for construction of a hydroelectric project, and for

other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ARROWROCK HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT.

Notwithstanding the time period specified in section 13 of the

Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 806) that would otherwise apply

to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission project numbered

4656, on request of the licensee, the Commission shall—

(1) if the license for the project is in effect on the date

of the enactment of this Act, extend the period for commencing

construction of project works for a period of 3 years beginning

on the date of enactment of this Act; or

(2) if the license for the project has been terminated before

the date of enactment of this Act, reinstate the license and

extend the period for commencing construction of project works

for an additional 3-year period beginning on the date of enactment of this Act.

Approved December 13, 2006.

Dec. 13, 2006

[H.R. 4377]
# EUR-Lex - 31986R0713 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31986R0713

**Commission Regulation (EEC) No 713/86 of 6 March 1986 amending Regulation (EEC) No 3143/85 on the sale at reduced prices of intervention butter intended for direct consumption in the form of concentrated butter **

*
Official Journal L 065 , 07/03/1986 P. 0016 - 0016 Finnish special edition: Chapter 3 Volume 20 P. 0150 Swedish special edition: Chapter 3 Volume 20 P. 0150 *

*****

COMMISSION REGULATION (EEC) No 713/86

of 6 March 1986

amending Regulation (EEC) No 3143/85 on the sale at reduced prices of intervention butter intended for direct consumption in the form of concentrated butter

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 804/68 of 27 June 1968, on the common organization of the market in milk and milk products (1), as last amended by Regulation (EEC) No 3768/85 (2), and in particular Article 6 (7) thereof,

Whereas Commission Regulation (EEC) No 3143/85 (3), as last amended by Regulation (EEC) No 3812/85 (4), made arrangements for the sale at reduced prices of intervention butter for direct consumption in the form of concentrated butter;

Whereas Article 5 of Regulation (EEC) No 3143/85 states that certain substances may be incorporated into the concentrated butter; whereas in the light of experience the incorporation of sodium chloride should also be permitted; whereas the maximum sitosterol content of stigmasterol incorporated in the butter under formulas I and II laid down in that Article should also be altered;

Whereas Article 5 (4) of Regulation (EEC) No 3143/85 states that packs of concentrated butter must carry certain wordings in clear and legible print; whereas the Danish language wording should be amplified;

Whereas the measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Milk and Milk Products;

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Article 5 of Regulation (EEC) No 3143/85 is hereby amended as follows:

1. The second subparagraph of paragraph 1 is replaced by the following:

'However, there may be incorporated in the concentrated butter a maximum of 2 % dry defatted milk components and/or 0,5 % lecithin (E 322) and/or 0,75 % sodium chloride.'

2. In formulas I and II in paragraph 2, '4 % sitosterol' is replaced by '6 % sitosterol'.

3. The first indent of paragraph 4 is replaced by the following:

'Stege- og bagesmoer' or 'stegesmoer'.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the third day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 6 March 1986.

For the Commission

Frans ANDRIESSEN

Vice-President

(1) OJ No L 148, 28. 6. 1968, p. 13.

(2) OJ No L 362, 31. 12. 1985, p. 8.

(3) OJ No L 298, 12. 11. 1985, p. 9.

(4) OJ No L 368, 31. 12. 1985, p. 3.