alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 616 

Directing the Committee on Government Reform to hold hearings on intelligence relating to the rationale for the commencement of Operation 

Iraqi Freedom. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 15, 2005 

Mr. LYNCH (for himself, Mr. WAXMAN, Mr. LANTOS, Mr. KANJORSKI, Mrs. 

MALONEY, Mr. CUMMINGS, Ms. NORTON, Mr. HIGGINS, and Ms. LINDA

T. SA ́NCHEZ of California) submitted the following resolution; which was 

referred to the Committee on Rules 

RESOLUTION 

Directing the Committee on Government Reform to hold 

hearings on intelligence relating to the rationale for the 

commencement of Operation Iraqi Freedom. 

1 Resolved, That the Committee on Government Re2 form shall, not later than 30 days after the date of the 

3 adoption of this resolution, hold at least one hearing, and 

4 as many additional hearings as considered necessary by 

5 the chairman of the committee, in consultation with the 

6 ranking minority member of the committee, on intelligence 

7 (as such term is defined in section 3(1) of the National 

8 Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 401a(1))) relating to the 
2 

•HRES 616 IH 

1 rationale for the commencement of Operation Iraqi Free2 dom that was available before the operation began on 

3 March 19, 2003. 

Æ
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the amended Quarterly Report of AccuPoll Holding Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Diana A. Dimadi, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


May 20, 2005                            /s/ Diana Dimadi
                                          --------------------------------------
                                            Diana Dimadi
                                            Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of BNP Residential Properties, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, D.
Scott Wilkerson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




   /s/ D. Scott Wilkerson
--------------------------------------------
D. Scott Wilkerson
President and Chief Executive Officer

November 11, 2002


                                       31
<PAGE>
p. 1 

# OAR Box 1828 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 193 ) ll-K-(I)- 6 Docket Number: 

# A-83-2 7

Printed 11/12/200811:12:55AM Sheet 193 of 325

# f\-QO~C I

II-K-(I)- 6
PRINCIPA L ASPECT S O F CONVERTIN G STEA M GENERATOR S BAC K T O COAL FIRING . Bogot , A . and R.C . Sherill . Combustio nEngineering , Inc . Publicatio nNo . TIS-4588 . Presente d a t th e NCA/BC A Coa l Conferenc e and EXP O II . Louisville . Octobe r 21-23 , 1975 . THI S INFORMATION

CA N B E FOUND I

N DOCKE T A-79-02 , ITE

M II-K-(I)- 6
NOT RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION 

File Name: 17a0449n.06 

No. 17-1093 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT 

WILLIAM D. SMITH, 

 Plaintiff-Appellant, 

 v. 

MELANY GAVULIC; HURLEY MEDICAL 

CENTER, 

 Defendants-Appellees. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

ON APPEAL FROM THE 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT 

COURT FOR THE EASTERN 

DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN 

BEFORE: NORRIS, SUHRHEINRICH, and GRIFFIN, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM. 

In this employment-discrimination case, plaintiff William Smith, former General Counsel 

to Hurley Medical Center, appeals the district court’s judgment granting summary judgment in 

favor of defendants Hurley and its CEO, Melany Gavulic. The case arises from Hurley’s Board 

of Managers’ decision to terminate Smith’s employment on Gavulic’s recommendation, which 

Smith alleges was an act of racial discrimination and retaliation for raising a complaint of racial 

discrimination against Gavulic. Smith’s complaint alleged four types of claims: a racial 

discrimination claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, a First Amendment retaliation claim, and violation 

of Michigan’s Whistle-Blowers’ Protection Act, M.C.L. § 15.361 et seq., and Elliott-Larsen 

Civil Rights Act, M.C.L. § 37.2101 et seq. The district court granted summary judgment in 

favor of defendants on each claim, and plaintiff appealed. 
No. 17-1093, Smith v. Gavulic, et al. 

-2- 

After reviewing the record, the parties’ briefs, and the applicable law, we conclude that 

the district court’s thorough and well-written opinion correctly articulates and applies the 

applicable law to undisputed facts and that the issuance of a full written opinion by this court 

would serve no jurisprudential purpose. Accordingly, for the reasons stated in the district court’s 

opinion, we affirm.
H. Res. 499

In the House of Representatives, U.S., 

May 16, 2006.

Whereas on July 9, 2004, American journalist Paul 

Klebnikov was murdered by gunmen as he exited the 

Moscow offices of Forbes Magazine; 

Whereas no person has been convicted of any offense in connection with the murder of Mr. Klebnikov; 

Whereas Mr. Klebnikov is survived by his wife Helen, and his 

three young children; 

Whereas twelve journalists have been murdered in the Russian Federation since 2000 and Mr. Klebnikov was the 

first and only United States citizen among these journalists; 

Whereas the Department of State’s 2005 Country Reports on 

Human Rights Practices states government pressure in 

Russia continues to weaken freedom of expression and 

the independence and freedom of the media, particularly 

among the major national television networks and regional media outlets; 

Whereas the Russian Prosecutor General’s office arrested and 

tried Musa Vahaev and Kazbek Dukzov for the murder 

of Mr. Klebnikov; 

Whereas Musa Vahaev and Kazbek Dukzov were acquitted on 

May 5, 2006, of the charges of murdering Mr. Klebnikov; 
2

•HRES 499 EH 

Whereas the Government of Russia has stated that Mr. 

Klebnikov’s murder was ordered by Khozh-Akhmed 

Nukhayev, a fugitive Chechen criminal gang leader, but 

has not publicly released any evidence of Mr. Nukhayev’s 

complicity; 

Whereas it remains unclear who ordered the murder of Mr. 

Klebnikov or if any party will be convicted of this crime; 

and 

Whereas a group of United States investigative journalists 

has launched an independent inquiry into the death of 

Mr. Klebnikov: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

(1) condemns the murder of American journalist 

Paul Klebnikov on July 9, 2004, in Moscow and the 

murders of other members of the media in the Russian 

Federation; 

(2) commends the Russian Prosecutor General’s office for its continuing investigation of the murder of Mr. 

Klebnikov; 

(3) urges the Government of Russia to continue its 

inquiries to determine and bring to justice all parties involved in the murder of Mr. Klebnikov; 

(4) urges the Government of Russia to accept offers 

of assistance with the investigation of Mr. Klebnikov’s 

murder from the United States and other concerned governments; 
3

•HRES 499 EH 

(5) urges the Government of Russia to take appropriate action to protect the independence and freedom of 

the Russian media and all visiting members of the 

media; and 

(6) commends all journalists working and living in 

Russia for their courageous dedication to transparency 

and the truth.

Attest: 

Clerk.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION IX 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, CA 94105



## MAY 0 6 

## 2011 Robert D. Fletcher Deputy Executive Officer CaliforniaAir Resources Board P. 

### 0. Box 2815 Sacramento,CA 958 12 Dear Mr. Fletcher: On April 5,2011,the CaliforniaAir Resources Board submittedrevisions to the California State Implementation Plan (SIP). We have reviewed materials submitted with the followingrules and found that they fulfill the completeness criteria in 40 CFR Part 5 1,Appendix V.This addresses all revisions in this submittal. 

### In the coming months we will review the complete revisions for action pursuant to Clean Air Act section 

### 110(k). Questions regarding our completeness review should be directed to Cynthia G. Allen at 

### (415)947-4120. Sincerely, 

# m\mhD~* Jordan Director, Air ~ivisioy 

## (j

cc: Mr. Thomas J. Christofk, APCO Placer County APCD Mr. Terry Dressler, APCO SantaBarbara County APCD Mr. Mat Ehrhardt, APCO Yolo-SolanoAQMD Mr. Douglas G. Gearhart, APCO Lake County APCD Mr. Larry Greene, APCO Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD Mr. Eldon Heaston Executive Officer Mojave Desert AQMD

### Mr. Seyed Sadredin, APCO SanJoaquin Valley Unified APCD Dr. Barry Wallerstein Executive Officer South Coast AQMD Mr. Michael Guzzetta,Manager Rule Evaluation Section Stationary Source DivisionUNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION IX 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, CA 94105-3901 

## MAY 3 

## 1 2011 Mr. Robert 

### D. Fletcher Deputy Executive Officer California Air Resources Board Post Office Box 28 15

On April 5,2011,the California Air Resources Board submitted revisions to the California State Implementation Plan. On May 6, 201 1,

### I wrote to you that EPA had found all revisions in the April 5th submittal complete. Unfortunately, our May 6th letter incorrectly identified several Placer County submittals. 

### I am providing below a corrected list of the submitted revisions that we found complete on May 6th.

### This addresses all revisions in this submittal. In the coming months we will review the complete revisions for action pursuant to Clean Air Act section 110(k). South Coast South Coast South Coast
South Coast Yolo Solano



### Questions regarding our completeness review should be directed to Cynthia G. Allen at 

### (41

### 5) 947-4120. Sincerely, 

# @* Deborah Jordan 1 144 1 171 1 175

2002 2.43



### Director, Air Division Metalworking Fluids and Direct-Contact Lubricants Solvent Cleaning Operations Control of Emissions from the Manufacture ofPolymeric Cellular (Foam) Products Allocations For Oxides ofNitrogen (NOx) and Oxides ofSulh(Sox) Biomass Boilers



### cc: Mr. Thomas J. Christofk, APCO Placer County APCD Mr. Michael Guzzetta, Manager Rule Evaluation Section Stationary Source Division
PGI 225.7203 Contracting officer distribution

of reports.

(a) Before contract award, forward a copy of any reports that are submitted with offers in

accordance with the provision at 252.225-7003, Report of Intended Performance Outside the United

States and Canada—Submission with Offer, to the Office of the Principal Director (Contract Policy)

via email to osd.pentagon.ousd-a-s.mbx.asda-dp-c-contractpolicy@mail.mil.

(b) Forwarding the reports as described in paragraph (a) of this section is necessary to satisfy the

requirement of 10 U.S.C. 4603 that notifications (or copies) of contract performance outside the

United States and Canada be maintained in compiled form for 5 years after the date of submission.

Parent topic: PGI 225.72 -REPORTING CONTRACT PERFORMANCE OUTSIDE THE UNITED

STATES
#### § 603.885 Updated program plans and budgets.

In addition to reports on progress to date, a TIA may include a provision requiring the recipient to annually prepare an updated technical plan for future conduct of the research effort and a revised budget if there is a significant change from the initial budget.
Exhibit 32



                       President's Written Certification
                            Of Financial Statements
                       Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Statute 1350



     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Statute 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 907 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity
as president of 4net Software, Inc. (the "Company") that

     (a) the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-QSB for the period ended
         June 30, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
         the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

     (b) the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of
         such period and the results of operations of the Company for such
         period.



Dated: August 13, 2008



                                            /s/ Steven N. Bronson
                                            ----------------------------------
                                            Steven N. Bronson, President
6/24/13

US Department of Transportation

Docket Management System

Washington, DC 20590

Attn: Ida Klepper

Subject: Petition for Exemption

Please accept this letter to formally request a petition for Exemption to combine Analar’s drug program for 

Part 135 and 91.147 into one program. Analar currently operates under FAA Part 135 certificate # 

CZIA106D and under a Letter of Agreement issued by FAA for its 91.147 operations. Analar’s pilots are 

currently tested under its Part 135 drug program and are the same pilots who also conduct flights under its 

91.147 LOA.

I am requesting these programs be combined into one program to improve Analar’s efficiency and accuracy

of its drug program. By combining the programs there is less chance of error and additionally, it will greatly

improve the efficiency of the DOT/FAA audits of our program. Granting an exemption will not affect public 

safety as it will not alter the required drug testing for either purpose (Part 135 or LOA).

In addition, the combination of the programs will improve efficiency of the FAA/DOT personnel because 

they won’t have to audit 2 programs for exact same purpose.

Best Regards,

Michael Renz

President

Analar Corporation

mrenz@analarcorp.com
2007-2428.

#### Masek v. Marroulis.

Trumbull App. No. 2007-T-0034, 2007-Ohio-6159. On motion for stay of court of appeals’ judgment. Motion denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Maritime Commission

# AGENCY:

Federal Maritime Commission.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

Notice is hereby given of the names of the members of the Performance Review Board.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Harriette H. Charbonneau, Director of Human Resources, Federal Maritime Commission, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., Washington, DC 20573.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Section 4314(c) (1) through (5) of title 5, U.S.C., requires each agency to establish, in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Office of Personnel Management, one or more performance review boards. The board shall review and evaluate the initial appraisal of a senior executive's performance by the supervisor, along with any recommendations to the appointing authority relative to the performance of the senior executive.

Richard A. Lidinsky, Jr.,

Chairman.

*The Members of the Performance Review Board are:*

1. Joseph E. Brennan, Commissioner.

2. Rebecca F. Dye, Commissioner.

3. Michael A. Khouri, Commissioner.

4. Clay G. Guthridge, Administrative Law Judge.

5. Erin M. Wirth, Administrative Law Judge.

6. Florence A. Carr, Deputy Managing Director.

7. Rebecca A. Fenneman, General Counsel.

8. Karen V. Gregory, Secretary.

9. Vern W. Hill, Director, Office of Consumer Affairs and Dispute Resolution Services.

10. Peter J. King, Director, Bureau of Enforcement.

11. Sandra L. Kusumoto, Director, Bureau of Certification and Licensing.

12. Ronald D. Murphy, Managing Director.

13. Austin L. Schmitt, Director, Bureau of Trade Analysis.

[FR Doc. 2010-32016 Filed 12-20-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
# L_2016151DE.01002201.xml

| 8.6.2016 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 151/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.6.2016

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 151/22

---

Berichtigung der Verordnung (EWG) Nr. 2658/87 des Rates vom 23. Juli 1987 über die zolltarifliche und statistische Nomenklatur sowie den Gemeinsamen Zolltarif

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 256 vom 7. September 1987
  )

Seite 2, letzter Erwägungsgrund

Anstatt:

„Mit dem Inkrafttreten dieser Verordnung werden die Verordnung (EWG) Nr. 950/68 des Rates vom 28. Juni 1968 über den Gemeinsamen Zolltarif (2) und die Verordnung (EWG) Nr. 97/69 des Rates vom 16. Januar 1969 über die zur einheitlichen Anwendung des Schemas des Gemeinsamen Zolltarifs erforderlichen Maßnahmen (3), zuletzt geändert durch die Verordnung (EWG) Nr. 2055/83 (4), aufgehoben —“

muss es heißen:

„Mit dem Inkrafttreten dieser Verordnung werden die Verordnung (EWG) Nr. 950/68 des Rates vom 28. Juni 1968 über den Gemeinsamen Zolltarif (2) und die Verordnung (EWG) Nr. 97/69 des Rates vom 16. Januar 1969 über die zur einheitlichen Anwendung des Schemas des Gemeinsamen Zolltarifs erforderlichen Maßnahmen (3), zuletzt geändert durch die Verordnung (EWG) Nr. 2055/84 (4), aufgehoben —“.

---
#### Forcheimer & Co. *v.*Port of Mobile.

*Bill in Equity to Enjoin Enforcement of Municipal Ordinance,*

1. *Injunction of enforcement of municipal ordinance.*— A court of equity will not interfere by injunction at the instance of an individual seeking to restrain the enforcement of a municipal ordinance, no question as to the protection of a franchise as to him being involved, no irreparable damage to him being threatened, and the invalidity of the ordinance not having been established at law.

Appeal from Chancery Court of Mobile!

Heard before the Hon. Thomas W. Coleman.

Complainants, and appellants, wbo are wholesale merchants and warehousemen in the Port of Mobile, and do business on and near the street upon which the railroad track runs, sought to enjoin the enforcement of a municipal ordinance prohibiting the loading and unloading of cars in *127the public streets o£ Mobile. The ordinance is that discussed in the case of the *.Pori of Mobile v. L.*& *N. Ji. R. Co.*just preceding this, and in which at the suit of the *R. R. Co.,*enforcement thereof was enjoined.

Overall & Bektor, for appellant.

B. H. Clarke, *eonira.*

SOMEEVILLE, J.

Under the principles settled in *The Port of Mobile v. The Louisville & Nashville Railroad Co.,*decided at the present term, and the case of *Burnett v. Craig,*30 Ala. 135; s. c. 68 Amer. Dec. 115, the facts stated in the complainants’ bill do not present a case of irreparable damage threatened by the enforcement of the municipal ordinance sought to be enjoined, and no question being involved as to the protection of a franchise, the decree of the chancellor must be affirmed. Before the injunctive aid of a chancery court can be successfully invoked in this case, the complainants must first establish the invalidity of the ordinance in question by judgment of a court of law. Their remedy at law is not shown to be inadequate.

Affirmed.
§ 12.105 Standards for awards. ( a ) A prevailing applicant may receive an award for fees and expenses incurred in connection with a proceeding or a significant and discrete substantive portion of the proceeding, unless the position of the Commission over which the applicant has prevailed was substantially justified. The position of the Commission includes, in addition to the position taken by the Commission in the adversary adjudication, the action or failure to act by the Commission upon which the adversary adjudication is based. The burden of proof that an award should not be made to a prevailing applicant because the Commission's position was substantially justified is on the Commission counsel.
( b ) An award will be reduced or denied if the applicant has unduly or unreasonably protracted the proceeding or if special circumstances make the award sought unjust.
#### § 7.3 Interpretations.

Except as specifically authorized by the Commission in writing, no interpretation of the meaning of the regulations in this part by an NRC officer or employee, other than a written interpretation by the General Counsel, shall be binding upon the Commission.