**(EXHIBIT D)**

**CWP WORKSHEET**

REFERENCE TO BULLETIN 1724D-101B

             BULLETIN 1724D-103

                                                                    Borrower:

                                                                    Engineer:

                                                                        Date:

**Pre-CWP Meeting:** Yes   No    N/A

1.  Do you agree with all the engineer’s and the borrower management’s proposed design criteria?                                                

   2.  Are the peak load and consumer projections of the current, REA approved Power Requirements Study                                         

        to be the basis for the voltage drop study?       

   3.  Does the borrower have a current, REA approved Long Range Plan?                                                                                           

   4.  Was the current Construction Work Plan reviewed?                                                                                                                     

   5.  Were deficiencies noted in the most recent SO&M Review (REA Form 300) discussed?                                                               

   6.  Was the “One System” planning concept and coordination with the borrower’s power supplier discussed?                                   

   7.  Is a new Sectionalizing Study needed?                                                                                                                                         

                                                                                                                                                Date:

**Draft CWP Meeting:**Yes   No   N/A

   1.  Does the engineer concisely list all reference materials (PRS, LRP, Sectionalizing Study, Load Flow                                            

        Analysis, etc.) used in the preparation of the CWP?                                                                                                                      

   2.  Is the engineer’s statement of service standards included in the CWP?                                                                                                                                                                                

   3.  Has the engineer reviewed and discussed the adequacy of the current LRP?                                                                                  

   4.  Are service interruptions summarized for the past 5 years?                                                                                                           

   5.  If the 5-year average for service interruptions exceed 5.0 consumer-hours per consumer per year, is a                                          

       detailed analysis included?                                                                                                                                                             

   6.  Is each proposed construction project adequately described (by narrative), justified and in accordance                                          

        with the agreed upon design criteria?  Narratives should:                                                                                                             

        a.  describe existing problems on the system,                                                                                                                                 

        b.  describe the corrective measures recommended,                                                                                                                       

        c.  explain how the corrective measures will solve the problems, and                                                                                             

        d.  clearly distinguish between system improvements and ordinary replacements.                                                                          

   7.  Is it clearly stated why the proposed construction was selected over other reasonable alternatives?                                                

   8.  Are projected construction costs reasonable and based on historical costs?                                                                                    

   9.  Does the engineer provide a summary of historical data and costs to support the projections to serve new                                     

        consumers?                                                                                                                                                                                   

2

                                                                                                                                                Date:            

**Continued:**Yes   No   N/A    

   10.  Has the engineer analyzed the borrower’s Form 300 and provided recommendations for improvement?                                      

   11.  Are all proposed major system improvements based on the current LRP recommended plan?                                                      

   12.  Do the circuit diagrams provide sufficient information to be able to assess system performance before and                                  

          after the proposed improvements?  Circuit diagram should:                                                                                                        

          a.  show present system with voltage drops at design load,                                                                                                          

          b.  show existing wire size,                                                                                                                                                         

          c.  show system improvements locations and adequate cross-reference to description in CWP,                                                    

          d.  show wire sizes and voltage drops after system improvements,                                                                                               

          e.  show transmission lines identified by owner and by voltage,                                                                                                   

          f.  be of a scale that relates substation areas with the entire system or at least adjacent substation areas, and                                

          g.  show kW demand or max current if a system improvement is current related rather than voltage related.                               

   13.  Are load flow diagrams included to justify transmission projects?                                                                                                

   14.  Is coordination (new delivery points, changes in existing delivery points) with the power supplier required?                              

   15.  Is a substation capacity/loading table included?                                                                                                                           

   16.  Is the need for new substations or changes in existing substations clearly identified and justified even though                             

          they may be provided by the power supplier?                                                                                                                              

   17.  (A)  Are carry-over projects from the last CWP identified and re-justified?                                                                                 

          (B)  Are completed projects from last CWP identified?                                                                                                               

   18.  Are proposed large power loads identified?                                                                                                                                 

   19.  Has a separate study been prepared to justify load management and SCADA projects?                                                               

           (See 7CFR 1710, SUBPART H.)                                                                                                                                                

   20.  Is this a reasonable 2, 3, or 4-year construction program for this borrower?  Is a significant variance from                                  

          Trendbucks justified?  Justification to be included in CWP or with any subsequent loan application.                                           

**Notes:**