alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT
32**
 
 **Certification
of Periodic Financial Report**
 **Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350**
 
 
 Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of Criticare
Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) certifies that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
of the Company for the period ended March 31, 2005 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
information contained in that Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
 
 
 
 Date: May
12, 2005     /s/
Emil H.
Soika
 Emil H. Soika,
Chief Executive Officer
 
 
 
 Date: May
12, 2005     /s/
Joel D.
Knudson
 Joel D.
Knudson, Vice President - Finance
 
 
 
 This
Certification is made solely for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject to
the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other
purpose.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 247 (Monday, December 27, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 81283]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-32413]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2010-N-0001]


Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee; Cancellation

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The meeting of the Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee 
scheduled for February 9, 2011, is cancelled. This meeting was 
announced in the Federal Register of December 6, 2010 (75 FR 75680). On 
February 9, 2011, the Oncologic Drugs Advisory Committee was scheduled 
to discuss biologics license application (BLA) 125377, with the 
proposed trade name YERVOY (ipilimumab), submitted by Bristol-Myers 
Squibb Co. The proposed indication (use) for this product is for the 
treatment of advanced melanoma in patients who have received prior 
therapy. This meeting has been cancelled because the issues for which 
FDA was seeking the scientific input of the committee have been 
resolved.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nicole Vesely, Center for Drug 
Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New 
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 31, rm. 2417, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 301-
796-9001, FAX: 301-847-8533, e-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#c688afa5a9aaa3e8b0a3b5a3aabf86a0a2a7e8aeaeb5e8a1a9b0"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="82ccebe1edeee7acf4e7f1e7eefbc2e4e6e3aceaeaf1ace5edf4">[email protected]</span></a>, or FDA 
Advisory Committee Information Line, 1-800-741-8138 (301-443-0572 in 
the Washington, DC area), and follow the prompts to the desired center 
or product area. Please call the Information Line for up-to-date 
information on this meeting.

    Dated: December 21, 2010.
Jill Hartzler Warner,
Acting Associate Commissioner for Special Medical Programs.
[FR Doc. 2010-32413 Filed 12-23-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit
10.3


Description
of Compensation Arrangement for Non-Executive Directors


Effective July 1, 2006, non-executive directors are
entitled to receive annual fees equal to $70,000.


Non-executive directors continue to be entitled to
receive $1,000 for any meeting of the Board of Directors or a committee thereof
that they attend.


Directors may elect to receive fees in the form of
common stock pursuant to the Advance America, Cash Advance Centers, Inc. Policy
Regarding Receipt of Common Stock in Lieu of Cash Director’s Fees.


All directors are entitled to reimbursement of
expenses incurred in connection with participating in board and committee
meetings.
STEAM ELECTRIC CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE 

EPA-HQ-OW-2009-0819 

DCN: SE03560

THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT 

CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION 

(CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.
Editorial Note on Part 70
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 70 appear at 81 FR 86910, Dec. 2, 2016.

§ 70.8 Information collection requirements: OMB approval. ( a ) The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has submitted the information collection requirements contained in this part to the office of Management and Budget (OMB) for approval as required by the Paperwork reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 *et seq.*). The NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. OMB has approved the information collection requirements contained in this part under control number 3150-0009.
( b ) The approved information collection requirements contained in this part appear in §§ 70.9, 70.17, 70.19, 70.20a, 70.20b, 70.21, 70.22, 70.24, 70.25, 70.32, 70.33, 70.34, 70.38, 70.39, 70.42, 70.50, 70.51, 70.52, 70.59, 70.61, 70.62, 70.64, 70.65, 70.72, 70.73, 70.74, and Appendix A.
( c ) This part contains information collection requirements in addition to those approved under the control number specified in paragraph (a) of this section. These information collection requirements and the control numbers under which they are approved are as follows: ( 1 ) In § 70.21(g), Form N-71 and associated forms are approved under control number 3150-0056.
( 2 ) In § 70.38, NRC form 314 is approved under control number 3150-0028.
( 3 ) In § 70.21(g), DOC/NRC Forms AP-1, AP-A, and associated forms are approved under control number 0694-0135.
[49 FR 19628, May 9, 1984, as amended at 52 FR 19305, May 22, 1987; 56 FR 40769, Aug. 16, 1991; 57 FR 18392, Apr. 30, 1992; 58 FR 39634, July 26, 1993; 62 FR 52189, Oct. 6, 1997; 65 FR 56225, Sept. 18, 2000; 67 FR 78142, Dec. 23, 2003; 73 FR 78606, Dec. 23, 2008]
226 So.2d 922

#### Mrs. Lena M. AMACKER, Individually and as Natural Tutrix of, for and on behalf of the Minor, Betty Jo Amacker v. Edgar W. KIRBY and The Travelers Indemnity Company.

No. 50035.

Oct. 14, 1969.

In re: Mrs. Lena M. Amacker, individually and as natural tutrix of, for and on behalf of the minor, Betty Jo Amacker, applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of East Baton Rouge. 224 So.2d 18.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal we find no error of law in its judgment.
Editorial Note on Part 2
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

§ 2.1310 Notice of hearing consisting of written comments. A notice of hearing consisting of written comments will: ( a ) State the issues to be considered;
( b ) Provide the names and addresses of participants;
( c ) Specify the schedule for the filing of written testimony, statements of position, proposed questions for the Presiding Officer to consider for submission to the other parties, and rebuttal testimony, consistent with the schedule provisions of § 2.1321.
( d ) State any other instructions the Commission deems appropriate.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 309 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 309

         Supporting the goals and ideals of National Poppy Day.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 3, 2017

  Mr. Carson of Indiana submitted the following resolution; which was 
      referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
         Supporting the goals and ideals of National Poppy Day.

Whereas Poppies are worn and displayed as a symbolic tribute to fallen and 
        future veterans and members of the Armed Forces;
Whereas the use of the poppy symbolically comes from the poem ``In Flanders 
        Fields'', which movingly begins, ``In Flanders Fields the poppies blow, 
        between the crosses, row on row'', referring to the poppies that sprang 
        up in the churned-up earth of newly dug soldiers' graves in parts of 
        Belgium and France following World War I;
Whereas at the end of World War I, the American Legion adopted the poppy as a 
        symbol of freedom and the blood sacrificed by members of the Armed 
        Forces in war;
Whereas the American Legion has long utilized the red poppy as its official 
        flower, symbolizing the blood shed by those who have served in the 
        United States Armed Forces;
Whereas the poppy is worn in England and Canada on Remembrance Day, also known 
        as Armistice Day and Poppy Day, to commemorate members of the armed 
        forces who have died in the line of duty;
Whereas as the United States commemorates the 100th anniversary of its entrance 
        into World War I and the American Legion approaches its 100th 
        anniversary, it is fitting to expand the meaning the poppy and formally 
        recognize its historic symbolism;
Whereas wearing a poppy can unite citizens from across the country who wish to 
        show their patriotism and appreciation for those who serve as members of 
        the United States Armed Forces; and
Whereas the Friday before each Memorial Day is an appropriate day to recognize 
        as ``National Poppy Day'': Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) supports the goals and ideals of National Poppy Day; 
        and
            (2) encourages all citizens, residents, and visitors of the 
        United States to join in observing National Poppy Day to honor 
        every member of the Armed Forces who has died in the name of 
        liberty, freedom, and democracy while also showing their 
        support for living veterans, members of the Armed Forces, and 
        their families.
                                 <all>
```
06/11/201 0 15:4 8 FAX 202433514 2 FAA •> DMS gl002/007 

06/01/2010 17:33 FAI 202 2675106 121002/007 

r r --• •' • •-•-.-i^ATii^i, I 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TBAHSPORTATION 

FEDBMO. AVIATION ADMINISTBATION 

OFFICE OF BEARINGS 

HASBIHGTON, D.C. 

in the Matter of: 

Empire Airlines, Inc. 

FAA Docket No. CP09NM0009 

DMS No. FAA-2009-0721 

Judge Goodwin 

Motion To Reschedule Hearing 

Pursuant to section 13.218 of the Federal Aviation 

Administration's (FAA's) Rules of Practice in Civil Penalty 

Proceeding, 14 C.F.R. § 13.218, the Administrator of the 

FAA files this Motion to Reschedule ,the Hearing, and in 

support thereof states as follows; 

1. On May 26, 2010, Judge Goodwin issued an order 

setting the hearing for the above case on July 27 and 28, 

2010. 

2. Donald Stiger, a key witness for the Federal 

Aviation Administration, has a long-planned vacation and 

family reunion that is scheduled from July 26 through July 

31, 2010, Mr. Stiger, who is the FAA's primary 

investigator on this case, will serve as a fact witness 

regarding his investigation of the shipments at issue. He 

is essential to the Federal Aviation Administration's case. 
OG/11/2010 15:48 FAX 2024935142 FAA * DMS @l003/007 

06/01/2010 17:34 FAX 202 2675106 121003/007 

3. The Administrator and his witnesses are available 

July 19" through 25"', August 2""^ through August 20'='', and 

the entire month of September, 

4. The Administrator has been in contact with Empire 

Airlines, In d regarding this conflict. Empire Airlines 

plans to file a response to this motion in which it will 

list the dates its attorneys and witnesses are available. 

Wherefore, the Administrator respectfully requests that 

this Court reschedule the hearing at a time that is 

convenient for the Court and the parties. 

Peter J. Lynch 

Assistant CiHrtsf Counsel 

By; 

[les Conneely 

'Attorney 

Enforcement Division, AGC-300 

Office of the Chief Counsel 

Tel: (202) 267-9958 

Fax: (202) 267-5106 

June 1, 2010 

. *•.) / ^^r^; ; • 
OG/11/2010 15:48 FAX 2024935142 

06/01/2010 17:34 FAX 202 2675106 

FAA DMS 0004/007 

@1004/007 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

Re: Federal Express, Inc. 

Case No. 2007NM700156 

FAA Docket No. CP0 9NM0010 

I hereby certify that on this date I served a copy of 

the ADMINISTRATOR'S MOTION TO RESCHEDULE HEARING and draft 

ORDER by Facsimile to: 

Ms. Courtney Felts, Esq. 

C/0 Mark Hansen, Esq. 

Federal Express, Inc. 

3620 Hacks Cross Road 

Building B, S"""* Floor 

Memphis, TN 38125-8800 

FAX 901 434-8263 

I further certify that on this date I have served the 

the foregoing by facsimile to; 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin... .. 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

East Building Ground Floor, Rm E12-320 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

TEL: 202.366.2139 

FAX: 202.366.7536 

Federal Aviation Administration 

600 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Wilbur Wright Building ~ Suite 2W1000 

Washington, D.C. 20591 

Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

FAiti--2T53?, 493. 5020 

Office of the Chief Counsel 

Enf^cement Division, AGC-300 

800 Independence Ave., SW 

Washington, DC 20591 

C-i-i^ 

Date 

..--.•..-^i.^^i
#### KELLOGG v. WILNER CONST. CO. et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

June 19, 1914.)

Action by Rawdon W. Kellogg against the Wilner Construetion Company and others.

No opinion. Motion for reargument denied, with $10 costs. For former decision, see 148 N. Y. Supp. 1124.
#### Carlos Sevilla et al., Respondents, v Efstathios Valiotis, Appellant.

[815 NYS2d 229]

In an action, inter alia, for specific performance of a contract for the sale of real property, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Satterfield, J.), dated *776January 5, 2005, which granted the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment on the cause of action seeking specific performance of the contract.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

In April 2004 the plaintiffs entered into a contract with the defendant to purchase a condominium apartment. After a title search revealed that the owner of record was the defendant’s defunct partnership, Victoria Hall Associates, the original sponsor of the condominium offering plan, the defendant attempted to cancel the contract with the plaintiffs on the ground that he could not convey clear title. The plaintiffs refused to accept cancellation and took the position that the defendant had the authority to sell the property on behalf of Victoria Hall Associates, as he had done so in the past. When the defendant still refused to close, the plaintiffs commenced this action seeking, inter alia, specific performance of the contract. Shortly thereafter, the plaintiffs moved for summary judgment. The Supreme Court granted the motion. We affirm.

Where, as here, a provision in the contract provides that in the event that the seller cannot convey a clear title, the seller may refund the buyer’s deposit, terminate the contract, and the buyer shall have no further claims against the seller, “that limitation ‘contemplates the existence of a situation beyond the control of the parties’ and implicitly requires the seller to act in good faith” *(Naso v Haque,*289 AD2d 309, 310 [2001], quoting *Mokar Props. Corp. v Hall,*6 AD2d 536, 539 [1958]; *see Bosco, Bisignano & Mascolo, Esqs., LLP v Turyan,*8 AD3d 418, 419 [2004]; *9 Bros. Bldg. Supply Corp. v Buonamicia,*299 AD2d 529 [2002]). Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the plaintiff established as a matter of law that the defendant failed to make a good faith effort to cure the title defects revealed by the title examination of the condominium apartment *(see 9 Bros. Bldg. Supply Corp. v Buonamicia, supra; Naso v Haque, supra).*Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment on the specific performance cause of action. Goldstein, J.P., Mastro, Rivera and Lunn, JJ., concur.
1 

### Parsons, Nick

From: **McMahon, Al (SABIC Innovative Plastics) [Al.McMahon @sabic-ip.com]**  Sent: **Tuesday, February 18, 2014 3:02 PM** To: **Parsons, Nick** Cc: **Varner, Thomas L (SABIC Innovative Plastics)** Subject: **Request for extension of comment deadline; Docket I D No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2012-0133**  Attachments: **SABIC request for extension of comment deadline (02 -18-2014).PDF** 



### Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2012-0133

**Dear Mr. Parsons,**

**Attached is a request by SABIC Innovative Plastics US LLC to extend the comment deadline in the above**  **referenced docket.**

**Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have an y questions.** 

**-- Regards,**  **Alphonse McMahon SABIC**  **Senior Counsel, EHSS**

**1 Lexan Lane Mount Vernon, IN 47620**  **T: 1.812.831.4688 F: 1.866.505.7124**  **E: al.mcmahon@sabic-ip.com**  **www.sabic-ip.com**



### -------------------------------- This e-mail and any attachments are for authorized use by the intended recipient(s) only. They may con tain proprietary material or confidential information an d/or be subject to legal privilege. They should not be copied, disclosed to, or used by any other party. If you have reason to believe that you are not one of the intended recipients of this e-mail, please n otify the sender immediately by reply e-mail and immediately delete this e-mail and any of its attachments. Than k you.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 11**  **- 6166** 

GARY WAITERS , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. DR. CROSS; MR. BENJAMIN; MRS. SPIKE; MR. MARSHALL; MR. QUMBLEY, official and individual capacities , Defendants

- Appell ees .

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Columbia

. J. Michelle Childs , District Judge. ( 3:09

- cv - 02686

- JMC )

Submitted : May 19, 2011 Decided: May 24, 2011

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and AGEE and KEENAN , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

. Gary Waiters, Appellant Pro Se. Marshall Hodges Waldron, Jr., GRIFFITH & SADLER, PA, Beaufort, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in thi s circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Gary Waiters appeals the district court ’ s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (200 6 ) complaint. The district court referred this case to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. A. § 636(b)(1)(B) ( West 200 6 & Supp. 2010 ). The magistrate judge recommended that relief be denied and advised Waiters that failure to timely file specific objections to this recommendation could waive appellate review of a district court order based upon the recommendation. The timely filing of sp ecific objections to a magistrate judge ’ s recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have been warned of the consequences of noncompliance. Wright v. Collins , 766 F.2d 841, 845

- 46 (4th Cir. 1985); see also Thomas v. Arn , 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Waiters has waived appellate review by failing to timely file specific objections after receiving proper notice. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. We dispense with oral ar gument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.
AFFIRMED
Exhibit 35.2

LOGO

Feb 28, 2018

Servicer
Compliance Statement

For SEMT 2013-4 (see Schedule A)

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of First Republic Bank (the Servicer), does hereby certify that:



| | (i) | a review of the Servicers activities during the reporting period from January 1, 2017 through December 31, 2017 and of its performance under the Agreement (as defined on Schedule A attached hereto) from the
above referenced trust during such period has been made under such officers supervision, and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | to the best of such officers knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under this Agreement in all material respects throughout such reporting period.
| | ---- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



First Republic BankBy:

/s/ Ron TremblayName:

Ron TremblayTitle:

Vice President of Residential LendingDate:

Feb. 28, 2018


San Francisco  Palo Alto  Los Angeles  Santa Barbara  Newport Beach  San Diego 
Portland  Palm Beach  Boston  Greenwich  New York





111 PINE STREET, SAN FRANCISCO,
CALIFORNIA 94111, TEL (415) 392-1400 OR (800) 392-1400, FAX (415) 392-1413

WWW.FIRSTREPUBLIC.COM  MEMBER FDIC AND


LOGO
 EQUAL HOUSING LENDER



---

LOGO

<for SEMT 2013-4>

SCHEDULE A



| | 1. | Flow Mortgage Loan Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of July 1, 2010, between Redwood Residential Acquisition Corporation and First Republic Bank, as modified by the Reconstitution Agreement dated
March 21, 2013 (the Agreement).
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



San Francisco
 Palo Alto  Los Angeles  Santa Barbara  Newport Beach  San Diego  Portland  Palm Beach  Boston  Greenwich  New York





111 PINE STREET, SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94111, TEL (415) 392-1400 OR (Soo) 392-1400, FAX (415) 392-1413

WWW.FIRSTREPUBLIC.COM  MEMBER
FDIC AND


LOGO
 EQUAL HOUSING LENDER
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                             367,842
<SECURITIES>                                       829,125
<RECEIVABLES>                                        8,822
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,207,362
<PP&E>                                                   0
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,786,460
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               30,190
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                        87,477,847
<OTHER-SE>                                               0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1,786,460
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    36,837
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       48,440
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (11,603)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (11,603)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                             0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                            0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0
                           


</TABLE>