alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 10.9
 REVISED SUMMARY SHEET
OF
2007 COMPENSATION
 Director Compensation
 Employee Directors
  Non-Employee Directors
   
    
    $12,000 restricted stock retainer, which vests over a
three year period, issued under the Companys 2007 Equity Incentive Plan. A copy of the
2007 Equity Incentive Plan is filed as an exhibit to the
Companys Form 8-K filed on April 20, 2007.
 
    
    $12,000 cash retainer payable in four quarterly payments.
  
    
    $900 cash fee for each Board of Directors meeting of the Company attended.
 
    
    $600 cash fee for each committee meeting attended.
  
    
    $2,000 fee payable in four quarterly payments to Presiding Independent Director.
 
    
    $2,000 fee payable in four quarterly payments to Committee Chairs.
  
    
    $900 additional fee for each full day spent in training at seminars or other training
sessions approved in advance by the Chairman of the Board.
 
    
    Reimbursement for travel and other expenses incurred for attending seminars or other
training sessions.
 
    
    Reimbursement for accommodations, travel or meals in connection with attending
corporate, board or other authorized functions, which includes Board of Directors meetings,
committee meetings, and Board retreats.




---



##### 



Compensation of Named Executive Officers
  Michael T. Vea, Chairman,
President and Chief Executive
Officer
    
    $
    468,180Martin M. Zorn, Executive
Vice-President, Chief Risk
Officer and Secretary
    
    $
    271,500Archie M. Brown, Executive
Vice-President, Commercial
and Consumer Banking
    
    $
    271,500Roger M. Watson, Executive
Vice-President, Division
Manager, Commercial Real Estate
    
    $
    210,000Roger W. Duncan, Executive
Vice-President, Evansville and
Community Banking Division
President
    
    $
    210,000
   -2-




---



##### 



Cash Incentives
    Equity-Based Incentives.
    2007 Executive Compensation Decisions.
   -3-




---



##### 



Threshold
    
    
    Target
    
    
    MaximumMichael T. Vea
    
    
    0
    %
    
    
    60
    %
    
    
    100
    %Martin M. Zorn
    
    
    0
    %
    
    
    45
    %
    
    
    80
    %Archie M. Brown
    
    
    0
    %
    
    
    45
    %
    
    
    80
    %Roger D. Watson
    
    
    0
    %
    
    
    35
    %
    
    
    60
    %Roger M. Duncan
    
    
    0
    %
    
    
    35
    %
    
    
    60
    %
   Threshold
    
    
    Target
    
    
    MaximumMichael T. Vea
    
    
    50
    %
    
    
    80
    %
    
    
    160
    %Martin M. Zorn
    
    
    20
    %
    
    
    35
    %
    
    
    70
    %Archie M. Brown
    
    
    20
    %
    
    
    35
    %
    
    
    70
    %Roger D. Watson
    
    
    20
    %
    
    
    35
    %
    
    
    60
    %Roger M. Duncan
    
    
    20
    %
    
    
    35
    %
    
    
    60
    %
 Other Compensation of Named Executive Officers
   Agreements with Other Executive Officers
   -4-
### Land status and federal mineral ownership in the Powder River basin, Wyoming and Montana; a digital data set for geographic information systems

By: Laura BiewickShayne R. UrbanowskiSheila CainLarry Neasloney

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr98102

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Documents:                                -  **Index Page**                                                                                                     (html)                                                                                                                                     
  - **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf) 
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

As the Nation's energy resources continue to be examined for development, it is critical that a digital database exist that contains location data for all Federal land and mineral resources. The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), in cooperation with the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), is collecting these ownership files and compiling them in Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc. (ESRI) ARC/INFO coverages, to form a standardized data library. A coverage is a digital version of a map in the form of vector data storage. These coverages are combined with models of coal deposits from the USGS National Coal Resource Assessment project, a five-year effort to identify and characterize the coal beds and coal zones that will provide fuel for the Nation’s energy needs during the first quarter of the twenty-first century. Geographic and geologic data layers are integrated in a Geographic Information System (GIS) to answer complex geo-spatial questions concerning coal resource occurrence.

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
**EXHIBIT
      31.1**





**CERTIFICATIONS**




I,
      Emil
      H. Soika, certify that:





1. I
      have
      reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Criticare Systems,
      Inc.;





2. Based
      on
      my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
      fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
      in
      light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
      with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. Based
      on
      my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
      in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
      results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
      periods presented in this report;





4. The
      registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing
      and
      maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
      Rules
      13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:





(a) designed
      such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
      and
      procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
      information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
      is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
      period in which this report is being prepared;





(b) evaluated
      the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and
      presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
      disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by
      this
      report based on such evaluation; and





(c) disclosed
      in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial
      reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that
      has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
      registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and





5. The
      registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
      recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
      registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
      (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





(a) all
      significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
      of
      internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
      adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
      report financial information; and





(b) any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
      who
      have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial
      reporting.





Date: 
      February 5, 2007








/s/
      Emil H.
      Soika


Emil
      H.
      Soika


President
      and Chief Executive Officer






2
###### Editorial Note on Part 2

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

#### § 2.1027 Sua sponte.

In any initial decision in a proceeding on an application for a construction authorization for a high-level radioactive waste repository at a geologic repository operations area under parts 60 or 63 of this chapter, or an application for a license to receive and possess high-level radioactive waste at a geologic repository operations area under parts 60 or 63 of this chapter, the Presiding Officer, other than the Commission, shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law on, and otherwise give consideration to, only those matters put into controversy by the parties and determined to be litigable issues in the proceeding.

[69 FR 2266, Jan. 14, 2004]
#### § 781.1 Scope.

The regulations of this part supplement the U.S. Department of Commerce regulations, entitled LICENSING OF GOVERNMENT OWNED INVENTIONS, at 37 CFR Part 404.

[77 FR 4889, Feb. 1, 2012]
p. 1 

# OAR Box 

# 1796 Prepped byKeeia Richards



### Document

Number: 

# 66 ) VI-B-1 7 Docket Number: 

# A-90-3 7

Printed 10/31/2008 4:20:38 PM Sheet 66 of 107P. 2 A-90-3 7 VI-B-1 7 Thi s documen t

ha s bee nmove dt o IV-D-33 1 a t th e reques t

o f th e projec t officer . I t

wa s incorrectl y categoriz eoriginally .
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 980 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 980

 To amend title 38, United States Code, to modify authorities relating 
   to the collective bargaining of employees in the Veterans Health 
                            Administration.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 7, 2017

Mr. Takano (for himself, Mr. Blumenauer, Mr. Brady of Pennsylvania, Ms. 
   Brownley of California, Mr. Cardenas, Mr. Cohen, Mr. Cooper, Mrs. 
   Dingell, Ms. Eshoo, Mr. Garamendi, Mr. Grijalva, Ms. Jayapal, Mr. 
 Kildee, Ms. Kuster of New Hampshire, Ms. Lofgren, Mr. Lowenthal, Mr. 
McGovern, Mr. Nolan, Mr. Pocan, Miss Rice of New York, Ms. Schakowsky, 
    Mr. Schiff, Mr. Walz, Mr. Panetta, Mr. Correa, and Mr. Khanna) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                           Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 38, United States Code, to modify authorities relating 
   to the collective bargaining of employees in the Veterans Health 
                            Administration.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``VA Employee Fairness Act of 2017''.

SEC. 2. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITIES ON COLLECTIVE BARGAINING OF 
              EMPLOYEES OF THE VETERANS HEALTH ADMINISTRATION.

    Section 7422 of title 38, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by striking subsections (b), (c), and (d); and
            (2) by redesignating subsection (e) as subsection (b).
                                 <all>
```
exv10w01



 





EXHIBIT 10.1




NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR COMPENSATION STRUCTURE



On July 24, 2006, Advanced Energy Industries, Inc. adopted the following compensation structure for
its non-employee directors, subject to shareholder approval:





	 	•	 	$20,000 annual retainer paid quarterly in July, October, February and April;
	 
	 	•	 	An additional $50,000 annual retainer for the Chair of the Board, paid quarterly in
July, October, February and April;
	 
	 	•	 	An additional $30,000 annual retainer for the Lead Director paid quarterly in July,
October, February and April;
	 
	 	•	 	$3,000 per day for each full board meeting, whether such meeting is held in person or
telephonically;
	 
	 	•	 	$4,000 per Audit and Finance Committee meeting for the Chair and $1,750 per meeting for
each other committee member, whether such meeting is held in person or telephonically;
	 
	 	•	 	$2,000 per Compensation Committee meeting or Corporate Governance & Nominations
Committee meeting for such Committee’s Chair and $750 for each other Committee member,
whether such meeting is held in person or telephonically;
	 
	 	•	 	15,000 restricted stock units on initial election or appointment to the Board, which
vest in equal installments over four years, contingent upon the recipient continuing to be
a director of the company; and
	 
	 	•	 	6,000 restricted stock units annually on the date of re-election at the annual meeting
which vest in equal installments over four years, contingent upon the recipient continuing
to be a director of the company.




In addition, each incumbent non-employee director who is re-elected at the 2007 annual meeting
of stockholders will be granted 10,000 restricted stock units upon such re-election. Such
restricted stock units will vest in equal installments over four years, contingent upon the
recipient continuing to be a director of the company
(November 17, 1980)

#### Kenneth J. Altman, Respondent, v Poughkeepsie Savings Bank, Appellant.

Judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated March 18, 1980, affirmed, with costs, for the reasons set forth in the decision of Mr. Justice Walsh at Trial Term. Titone, J. P., Gibbons, Margett and O’Connor, JJ., concur.
To: U.S. Department of Energy

Date: October 2 , 2013

Re: Ex parte meeting on Grid

- enabled water heaters, September 26, 2013.

On September 26, 2013 a number of stakeholders met with DOE representatives regarding water heater standards and thermal storage and demand response programs.

The following individuals were in the meeting:

Jay Morrison, National Rural Electric Cooperative Association Keith Dennis, National Rural Electric Cooperat ive Association Julie Barkemeyer, National Rural Electric Cooperative Association Brian Cavey, National Rural Electric Cooperative Association (on phone) Harvey Sachs, American Council for an Energy

- Efficient Economy Lowell Ungar, American Council for an E nergy

- Efficient Economy Robin Roy, Natural Resources Defense Council Craig Glazer, PJM Interconnection Steve Rosenstock, Edison Electric Institute Alex Hofmann, American Public Power Association
Charlie Adams , A

. O

. Smith Corporation (on phone)
Jos h Greene, representing A. O. Smith Corporation (on phone) Karen Meyers, Rheem Manufacturing Company (on phone) Paul Steffes, Steffes Corporation (on phone) John Cymbalsky, DOE Dan Cohen, DOE Ari Altman, DOE

Mr. Jay Morrison presented DOE with a copy of recent draft legislative language agreed to by the stakeholders in the meeting . This draft amendment to S.1392 gives as its purpose, “To modify the efficiency standards for grid

- enabled water heaters

. ” It would allow restricted sales of resistance water heaters larger than 75 gallons after April 16, 2015 for use in thermal storage and demand response programs with specified conditions and reporting requirements

, and with episodic reviews of the program by t he Secretary of Energy. The stakeholders presented it to DOE staff for their information , to clarify the intent of the legislative proposal, and so that the parties and DOE staff could discuss whether the ideas within the language could potentially be inc orporated in the regulatory proposal pending in
docket no. EERE

- 2012

- BT

- STD

- 0022

.

Mr. Morrison noted that the group did not have full consensus on any specific regulatory alternative

, but that the issue is important enough to warrant early consideration. He expressed hope that DOE would be able to find an alternative regulatory approach to achieving the same ends as the legislation.

The draft amendment is attached.
Exhibit 32





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report
on Form 10-K of Mazzal Holding Corp, (the “Company”) for the year ending December 31, 2013, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Nissim Trabelsi, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



(1) The report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





|Dated:
    October 21, 2015 | By: /s/ Nissim Trabelsi 
|--------------------------- | ------------------------
|                            | Nissim Trabelsi         
|                            | Chief Executive Officer,
|                            | Chief Financial Officer 





This certification accompanies each
Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
§ 75.28 Termination from IAEA safeguards. ( a ) Upon request of the U.S. Government, the IAEA may terminate IAEA safeguards on nuclear material that has been consumed, or has been diluted in such a way that it is no longer usable for any nuclear activity relevant from the point of view of safeguards, or has become practicably irrecoverable.
( b ) The NRC will notify the affected licensees, certificate holders, and nuclear material outside facilities of the IAEA's termination of IAEA safeguards.
#### BLIEFERNICH, Respondent, v. LIVERPOOL & LONDON & GLOBE INS. CO., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

November 13, 1914.)

Action by Henry Bliefernich against the Liverpool & London & Globe Insurance Company.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment and order reversed, and new trial granted, costs to abide the event, unless within 10 days plaintiff stipulate to reduce the verdict by the sum of $400, together with proportionate interest, in which event the judgment, as so modified, and the order, are affirmed, without costs:
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 550 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 550

  Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives regarding the 
importance of maintaining the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) 
 forum as the preeminent multilateral institution in the Asia-Pacific 
                                region.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 10, 2005

  Mr. Kirk (for himself, Mr. Larsen of Washington, Mr. Manzullo, Mr. 
Burton of Indiana, Mr. Crowley, Mr. Kennedy of Minnesota, Mr. Smith of 
 Washington, and Mr. Wilson of South Carolina) submitted the following 
   resolution; which was referred to the Committee on International 
                               Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives regarding the 
importance of maintaining the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) 
 forum as the preeminent multilateral institution in the Asia-Pacific 
                                region.

Whereas the Asia-Pacific region accounts for 40 percent of the world's 
        population, more than half of world trade, and 60 percent of global 
        gross domestic product;
Whereas the growth of the Asia-Pacific region has created millions of new jobs 
        in the United States;
Whereas United States businesses in the Asia-Pacifc region face obstacles to 
        doing business in the region, in part due to a rise in discriminatory 
        regulations and standards;
Whereas the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) was established as a forum 
        for the United States to address business concerns in the region;
Whereas success in APEC contributes directly to keeping the United States at the 
        forefront of the global marketplace by strongly supporting current World 
        Trade Organization (WTO) negotiations, developing model measures for 
        high quality free trade agreements, sensible regulations and standards, 
        and streamlining the movement of goods across borders by its members; 
        and
Whereas the upcoming APEC Leaders' Meeting in Busan, Korea is an important 
        opportunity to demonstrate to the world the commitment of the United 
        States to improving prosperity and security in the Asia-Pacific region: 
        Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives 
that--
            (1) the continuing success of the Asia-Pacific Economic 
        Cooperation (APEC) is in the national interest of the United 
        States because APEC is the only multilateral institution in the 
        Asia-Pacific region that includes the United States; and
            (2) APEC should remain at the center of United States 
        diplomacy in the Asia-Pacific region.
                                 <all>
```