alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v. Oneilo Ruiz, Respondent.

Order entered January 17, 1969 granting defendant’s motion, after hearing, to suppress certain statements, unanimously reversed on the facts, and law, and the motion denied. The court found the defendant’s statements, which were made to the officers on the street prior to their giving the defendant the *Miranda*warnings *(Miranda*v. *Arizona,*384 U. S. 436), were admissible because they were made voluntarily while he was not in custody. As to those statements, the motion to suppress was denied. The court suppressed all acts performed by the defendant after the *Miranda*warnings were given to him on the street, and, specifically, the act of leading the detectives to his automobile. With reference to those statements made by the defendant after he was given the *Miranda*warnings and before he arrived at the police station, the court found the defendant understood all the warnings. Since, however, the detective merely asked the defendant if he understood, without more, the court held there was not demonstrated a conscious or express waiver *909to have counsel present before the questioning. This fact coupled with the court’s findings that the questioning at this point occurred while the defendant was in custody is the basis of the court’s ruling that the *Miranda*warnings given were not sufficient. The court made an express finding that the defendant understood the English language. In our opinion the defendant by his acts and conduct after the *Miranda*warnings were read to him waived his privilege against self incrimination. The record clearly demonstrates that the defendant also intelligently waived his right to counsel, and did so immediately after the warnings were given. *No*express statement of waiver is necessary if the facts and surrounding circumstances clearly demonstrate that such a waiver was otherwise made. *(People*v. *Matthews,*30 A D 2d 776, affd. 25 N Y 2d 870.) The defendant not only said he knew what was read to him, he voluntarily offered to take the police to where the automobile was located, and took the police to that location. These events transpired immediately after the warnings were given. Waiver in each ease depends on the facts, including the background, experience and conduct of the accused. *(Carnley*v. *Cochran,*369 U. S. 506; *Johnson*v. *Zerbst,*304 U. S. 458; *United States*v. *Hayes,*385 F. 2d 375, cert, den., 390 ü. S. 1006; *People*v. *Bodie,*16 N Y 2d 275.) Concur—Eager, J. P., Markewich, McNally and Steuer, JJ.
#### § 431.191 Purpose and scope.

This subpart contains energy conservation requirements for distribution transformers, pursuant to Parts B and C of Title III of the Energy Policy and Conservation Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 6291-6317.

[71 FR 24995, Apr. 27, 2006]
#### HAVERY, Appellant, v. WAGSTAFF, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

June 12, 1914.)

Action by Margaret P. Havery against Alfred Wagstaff, as executor, etc.

A. S. Gilbert, of New York City, for appellant.

H. Barry, of New York City, for respondent.

No opinion. Judgment and order affirmed, with Costs. Order filed. See, also, 147 N. Y. Supp. 1115.
Exhibit 32.2
  CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
  I, Terry
R. Lazar, Chief Financial Officer of PureSafe Water Systems, Inc. (the
“Registrant”), hereby certify that the Form 10-Q of PureSafe Water Systems, Inc.
for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2009 (the “Report”) fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, and the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Registrant.
 
 Date:  May20,
      2009Terry
      R. LazarChief
      Financial Officer
§ 1120.405 Content of the preamble. The preamble for each set of general terms and conditions must include at least the following information elements, organized in the order shown: ( a ) *Table of contents.* This should show the articles within each other subdivision of the general terms and conditions (Subdivisions B and C for administrative and national policy requirements and, if needed, Subdivision D for programmatic requirements).
( b ) *Scope.* This element identifies the programs, types of awards, and types of recipient entities that are subject to the set of general terms and conditions.
( c ) *Effective date.* This is the date on which the particular version of the set of general terms and conditions became effective, which enables a recipient to easily distinguish it from any earlier or subsequent versions. The version date of each article within the general terms and conditions must be indicated in parentheses following the title of the article, to help a recipient identify the articles that changed from previous versions of the general terms and conditions.
( d ) *English language.* The purpose of this element of the preamble is to implement OMB guidance in 2 CFR 200.111(b) by informing each recipient that: ( 1 ) It must translate any of the award content (including attachments to it and any material incorporated into the award by reference) into another language to the extent that the recipient's compliance with the award's terms and conditions depends upon a significant number of its employees who are not fluent in English being able to read and comprehend that content.
( 2 ) If it does translate any award content into another language, either as required by paragraph (d)(1) of this section or at its own initiative, the original award content in the English language will take precedence in the event of an inconsistency between the award requirements in the English and translated versions.
( e ) *Plain language.* This section of the preamble is required when the general terms and conditions use personal pronouns, in accordance with § 1120.310. Its purpose is to inform recipients about the meanings of those personal pronouns.
( f ) *Definitions.* Providing the definitions of words and phrases that are used in the general terms and conditions and defined in the DoDGARs is more helpful to recipients than referring them to the DoDGARs to find the definitions.
PGI 229.101 Resolving tax problems.

(a) For the military departments, the Defense Logistics Agency, and the Defense Contract

Management Agency, the members of the DFARS Tax Committee are the designated legal counsel

for tax matters within their respective departments/agencies.

(b) Information on fuel excise taxes, including applicability, exemptions, and refunds, is available as

follows:

(i) The DLA Energy website at www.desc.dla.mil provides information on Federal, State, and local

excise taxes.

(ii) Internal Revenue Service Publications 510 and 378, available on the Internal Revenue Service

website at www.irs.gov, provide information on Federal excise taxes.

(c) The contracting officer may direct the contractor to litigate the applicability of a particular tax

if—

(i) The contract is either a cost-reimbursement type or a fixed-price type with a tax escalation clause

such as FAR 52.229-4; and

(ii) The direction is coordinated with the DoD Tax Policy and Advisory Group through the agencydesignated legal counsel.

(d)(i) Tax relief agreements between the United States and foreign governments in Europe that

exempt the United States from payment of specific taxes on purchases made for common defense

purposes are maintained by the United States European Command (USEUCOM). For further

information, contact HQ USEUCOM, ATTN: ECLA, Unit 30400, Box 1000, APO AE 09128;

Telephone: DSN 430-8001/7263, Commercial 49-0711-680-8001/7263; facsimile: 49-0711-680-5732.

(ii) Other international treaties may exempt the United States from the payment of specific taxes.

The Department of State publishes a list of treaties on its website at www.state.gov.

(iii) Tax relief also may be available in countries that have not signed tax relief agreements. The

potential for such relief should be explored in accordance with paragraph (d)(iv) of this section.

(iv) DoD Directive 5100.64, DoD Foreign Tax Relief Program, defines DoD tax relief policy and

requires designation of a military commander as the single point of contact for investigation and

resolution of specific matters related to the foreign tax relief program within the country for which

the commander is designated. Those military commanders are the same as the ones designated

under DoD Directive 5525.1, Status of Forces Policy and Information, and specified in Appendix C of

Army Regulation 27-50/SECNAVINST 5820.4G,Status of Forces Policies, Procedures, and

Information. Appendix C of Army Regulation 27-50/SECNAVINST 5820.4G is available at

http://www.army.mil/usapa/epubs/xml_pubs/r27_50/main.xml#appc.

(v) Also see PGI 229.70 for special procedures for obtaining tax relief and duty-free import privileges

when conducting U.S. Government acquisitions in certain foreign countries.

Parent topic: PGI 229.1 -GENERAL
###### Editorial Note on Part 4

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 4 appear at 77 FR 39904, July 6, 2012.

#### § 4.74 Content of orders.

The final decision may provide for suspension or termination of, or refusal to grant or continue Federal financial assistance, in whole or in part, to which this regulation applies, and may contain such terms, conditions, and other provisions as are consistent with and will effectuate the purposes of the Act and this subpart, including provisions designed to assure that no Federal financial assistance to which this regulation applies will thereafter be extended to the applicant or recipient determined by such decision to be in default in its performance of an assurance given by it pursuant to this subpart, or to have otherwise failed to comply with this subpart, unless and until it corrects its noncompliance and satisfies the NRC that it will fully comply with this subpart. A copy of the final decision shall be mailed to the applicant or recipient and the complainant, if any.

[29 FR 19277, Dec. 31, 1964, as amended at 68 FR 51344, Aug. 26, 2003]
#### § 1401.110 What policies and procedures must I follow?

(a) *General.* You must follow the policies and procedures specified in applicable sections of the OMB guidance in Subparts A through F of [2 CFR part 182](/on/2024-09-17/title-2/part-182), as implemented by this part.

(b) In implementing OMB guidance in [2 CFR part 182](/on/2024-09-17/title-2/part-182), this part supplements four sections of the guidance, as shown in the following table. For each of those sections, you must follow the policies and procedures set forth in the OMB guidance, as supplemented by this part.

| Section of OMB guidance | Section in this part where supplemented | What the supplementation clarifies |
| --- | --- | --- |
| (1) [2 CFR 182.225(a)](/on/2024-09-17/title-2/section-182.225#p-182.225(a)) | § 1401.335 | Whom in the DOI a recipient other than an individual must notify if an employee is convicted for a violation of a criminal drug statute in the workplace. |
| (2) [2 CFR 182.300(b)](/on/2024-09-17/title-2/section-182.300#p-182.300(b)) | § 1401.401 | Whom in the DOI a recipient who is an individual must notify if he or she is convicted of a criminal drug offense resulting from a violation occurring during the conduct of any award activity. |
| (3) [2 CFR 182.500](/on/2024-09-17/title-2/section-182.500) | § 1401.600 | Who in the DOI is authorized to determine that a recipient other than an individual is in violation of the requirements of [2 CFR Part 182](/on/2024-09-17/title-2/part-182), as implemented by this part. |
| (4) [2 CFR 182.505](/on/2024-09-17/title-2/section-182.505) | § 1401.605 | Who in the DOI is authorized to determine that a recipient who is an individual is in violation of the requirements of [2 CFR Part 182](/on/2024-09-17/title-2/part-182), as implemented by this part. |

(c) *Sections of the OMB guidance that this part does not supplement.* For any section of OMB guidance in Subparts A through F of [2 CFR Part 182](/on/2024-09-17/title-2/part-182) that is not listed in [paragraph (b)](/on/2024-09-17/title-2/section-1401.110#p-1401.110(b)) of this section, DOI policies and procedures are the same as those in the OMB guidance.
#### § 820.71 Standard.

If a person subject to the Act or the DOE Nuclear Safety Requirements has, by act or omission, knowingly and willfully violated, caused to be violated, attempted to violate, or conspired to violate any section of the Act or any applicable DOE Nuclear Safety Requirement, the person shall be subject to criminal sanctions under the Act.
§ 75.34 Inventory change reports. ( a ) Each licensee of a facility, certificate holder, or possessor of nuclear material outside facilities who transfers nuclear material subject to IAEA safeguards shall submit an Inventory Change Report (Nuclear Material Transaction Report) to the NRC no later than the close of business the next working day after each transfer, in accordance with the instructions in NUREG/BR-0006 and NMMSS Report D-24 “Personal Computer Data Input for NRC Licensees.” Each licensee of a facility, certificate holder, or possessor of nuclear material outside facilities who receives nuclear material subject to IAEA safeguards shall submit an Inventory Change Report to the NRC. Inventory Change Reports for receipts must be submitted within 10 days after the material is received, in accordance with the instructions in NUREG/BR-0006 and NMMSS Report D-24 “Personal Computer Data Input for NRC Licensees.” Copies of the instructions for completing DOE/NRC Form 741 and DOE/NRC Form 740M may be obtained from the following websites: *http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/nuregs/brochures* and *https://nnsa.energy.gov/aboutus/ourprograms/nuclearsecurity/nmmsshome/nmmssinfo/nmmssreports .*
( b ) An Inventory Change Report (Nuclear Material Transaction Report) must specify identification and batch data for each batch of nuclear material, the date of the inventory change, and, as appropriate: ( 1 ) The originating IAEA material balance area or the shipper; and
( 2 ) The receiving IAEA material balance area or the recipient.
( 3 ) Each person who receives any nuclear material from a foreign source shall complete both the supplier's and receiver's portion of DOE/NRC Form 741.
( 4 ) Each person in the U.S. Caribbean Territories who receives nuclear material from the U.S. outside the U.S. Caribbean Territories shall complete both the supplier's and receiver's portion of DOE/NRC Form 741.
( c ) An Inventory Change Report must be accompanied by DOE/NRC Form 740M whenever it is necessary to: ( 1 ) Explain the inventory changes set forth in the operating records required by § 75.23; or
( 2 ) Describe, to the extent specified in the license conditions, the anticipated operational program for the facility, including, but not limited to, the schedule for taking physical inventory.
( d ) Copies of the instructions for completing DOE/NRC Form 741 and DOE/NRC Form 740M may be obtained from the following websites: *http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/nuregs/brochures* and *https://nnsa.energy.gov/aboutus/ourprograms/nuclearsecurity/nmmsshome/nmmssinfo/nmmssreports .*
[83 FR 19613, May 4, 2018]
#### § 1108.305 Procurement transaction.

*Procurement transaction* means a legal instrument by which a recipient or subrecipient purchases property or services it needs to carry out the project or program under its award or subaward, respectively. A procurement transaction is distinct both from “subaward” and “procurement contract,” as those terms are defined in this subpart.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

NORTHERN DIVISION

ALMA T. McBROOM, *

PLAINTIFF *

VS. * CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:06 CV767-F

JOHN E. POTTER, POSTMASTER *

GENERAL UNITED STATES POSTAL *

SERVICE; NATIONAL POSTAL *

MAIL HANDLERS UNION; THE *

MONTGOMERY ALABAMA AREA *

LOCAL AMERICAN POSTAL WORKERS *

UNION, AFL-CIO; and VANESSA *

GORDON, *

DEFENDANTS *

REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS 

COMES NOW Defendant, CONNIE FREEMAN by and through 

Counsel and request Plaintiff admit or deny the following 

within 30 days after service of this request.

1. That the Local Union is not required to accompany, 

represent or file a grievance on your behalf 

pursuant to the Collective Bargaining Agreement in 

force at the relevant time complained of. Exhibit 1

2. That Vanessa Gordon did in fact accompany, 

represent you resulting in the document described 

as “Mutual Agreement” Defendant’s Exhibit 2

3. That you failed to follow up or contact VANESSA 

GORDON after the “Mutual Agreement” was signed.

Case 2:06-cv-00767-MEF-SRW Document 60 Filed 03/29/2007 Page 1 of 3
4. That you personally filed a grievance concerning 

your claim for compensation from the Postal 

Service.

5. That after December 31, 2004 you failed or refused 

to answer certified letters sent to you by your 

immediate supervisor concerning your alleged 

grievance. 

6. That you in fact have not been determined to be 

totally disabled.

7. That you, in fact, could work.

3/29/07 /s/ William P. Roberts, II

DATE SIGNATURE OF COUNSEL

COUNSEL FOR:

VANESSA GORDON

HOWELL, SARTO & HOWELL

P.O. Box 681864

147 E. Main St.

Prattville, AL 36068-1864

(334)365-2286

Case 2:06-cv-00767-MEF-SRW Document 60 Filed 03/29/2007 Page 2 of 3
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that I have served a copy of the 

foregoing upon the following by U. S. Mail, first class, 

postage pre-paid and through the Court’s electronic filing 

system: 

Debrorah Nicknson 

2820 Fairlane Drive, A-10

Montgomery, AL 36116

Brenda C. Zwack 

O’DONNELL, SCHWARTZ, & ANDERSON, P.C.

1300 L. Street NW, Suite 1200

Washington, DC 20005-4126

Patrick Nakamura 

NAKAMURA, QUINN & WALLS LLP 

2204 Lakeshore Drive, Suite 130

Birmingham, AL 35209

Dated: March 29, 2007 /s/ William P. Roberts, II

Case 2:06-cv-00767-MEF-SRW Document 60 Filed 03/29/2007 Page 3 of 3
Case 2:06-cv-00767-MEF-SRW Document 60-2 Filed 03/29/2007 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:06-cv-00767-MEF-SRW Document 60-2 Filed 03/29/2007 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:06-cv-00767-MEF-SRW Document 60-2 Filed 03/29/2007 Page 3 of 3
Case 2:06-cv-00767-MEF-SRW Document 60-3 Filed 03/29/2007 Page 1 of 1
227 So.2d 596

#### Dianne RIDGE, Aaron Prescott v. ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY et al.

No. 50149.

Nov. 12, 1969.

In re: August J. Beyl applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of East Baton Rouge. 225 So.2d 704; 225 So.2d 707.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal there appears no error of law in ,its judgment.
IV 

House Calendar No. 169 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1001 

[Report No. 115–834] 

Providing for consideration of the concurrent resolution (H. Con. Res. 119) 

expressing the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental 

to the United States economy. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 17, 2018 

Mr. NEWHOUSE, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the concurrent resolution (H. 

Con. Res. 119) expressing the sense of Congress that 

a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States 

economy. 

1 Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it 

2 shall be in order to consider in the House the concurrent 

3 resolution (H. Con. Res. 119) expressing the sense of Con4 gress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to the United 

5 States economy. All points of order against consideration 

6 of the concurrent resolution are waived. The concurrent 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1001 RH 

1 resolution shall be considered as read. All points of order 

2 against provisions in the concurrent resolution are waived. 

3 The previous question shall be considered as ordered on 

4 the concurrent resolution and preamble to adoption with5 out intervening motion or demand for division of the ques6 tion except one hour of debate equally divided and con7 trolled by the chair and ranking minority member of the 

8 Committee on Ways and Means. 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS

pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
House Calendar No. 169 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1001 

[Report No. 115–834] 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the concurrent resoto the United States economy. Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental lution (H. Con. Res. 119) expressing the sense of 

JULY 17, 2018 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
(logo)C-III | C-III Asset Management

 

 

**OFFICER’S CERTIFICATE**

**C-III Asset Management LLC**

 

 

Theundersigned, Barry Davis, President of C-III Asset Management LLC (*f/k/aCenterline Servicing LLC*), the Special Servicer under that certain Poolingand Servicing Agreement dated as of March 1, 2013, relating to the **J.P.Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Trust 2013-C10, Commercial MortgagePass-Through Certificates, Series 2013-C10** (the “Pooling and ServicingAgreement”), hereby certifies as follows:

 

1.       areview of the activities of the Special Servicer and of its performance underthe Pooling and Servicing Agreement during the calendar year 2017 (the“Reporting Period”) has been made under the undersigned’s supervision;

 

2.       tothe best of the undersigned’s knowledge, based on such review, the SpecialServicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Pooling and ServicingAgreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

Capitalizedterms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings given them in thePooling and Servicing Agreement.

 

 

**INWITNESS WHEREOF**, as of the 1st day of March, 2018, I havehereunto signed my name.

 

 

/s/Barry Davis

**BarryDavis**,President

C-IIIAsset Management LLC, a 

Delawarelimited liability company

 

 

JPM2013-C10
###### Editorial Note on Part 712

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 712 appear at 88 FR 41292, June 26, 2023.

#### § 712.30 Applicability.

This subpart establishes standards and procedures for conducting medical assessments of DOE and DOE contractor individuals in HRP positions.
###### Editorial Note on Part 72

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 72 appear at 80 FR 74981, Dec. 1, 2015, and at 81 FR 86910, Dec. 2, 2016.

#### § 72.56 Application for amendment of license.

Whenever a holder of a specific license desires to amend the license (including a change to the license conditions), an application for an amendment shall be filed with the Commission fully describing the changes desired and the reasons for such changes, and following as far as applicable the form prescribed for original applications.

[64 FR 53616, Oct. 4, 1999]
#### UEBERWASSER v. HEEN et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

December 4, 1914.)

Action by Bernhard Ueberwasser against Sophia Keen, impleaded with Matthew J. Smith and others.

No" opinion. Order of the County Court of Richmond County reversed. Settle order pursuant to stipulation. See, also, 163 App. Div. 969, 148 N. Y. Supp 1148.