alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 745.114 Cooperative Research. ( a ) Cooperative research projects are those projects covered by this policy that involve more than one institution. In the conduct of cooperative research projects, each institution is responsible for safeguarding the rights and welfare of human subjects and for complying with this policy.
( b ) ( 1 ) Any institution located in the United States that is engaged in cooperative research must rely upon approval by a single IRB for that portion of the research that is conducted in the United States. The reviewing IRB will be identified by the Federal department or agency supporting or conducting the research or proposed by the lead institution subject to the acceptance of the Federal department or agency supporting the research.
( 2 ) The following research is not subject to this provision: ( i ) Cooperative research for which more than single IRB review is required by law (including tribal law passed by the official governing body of an American Indian or Alaska Native tribe); or
( ii ) Research for which any Federal department or agency supporting or conducting the research determines and documents that the use of a single IRB is not appropriate for the particular context.
( c ) For research not subject to paragraph (b) of this section, an institution participating in a cooperative project may enter into a joint review arrangement, rely on the review of another IRB, or make similar arrangements for avoiding duplication of effort.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Calvin Edison Frett, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered February 28, 1969, convicting him of robbery in the first degree and other crimes, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Judgment reversed, on the law, and new trial ordered. The findings of fact below are affirmed. In our opinion, under the particular circumstances of this case, defendant was deprived of his right to counsel when the trial court denied his request for an opportunity to obtain different retained counsel *(People*v. *Walker,*29 A D 2d 973). Christ, P. J., Latham, Kleinfeld, Brennan and Benjamin, JJ., concur.
MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS

1992-1249.

#### State v. Richard.

Cuyahoga App. No. 54040. On motion to vacate the court’s order dated October 28, 1992. Motion denied.
IV 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 756 

Expressing support for designation of March 21, 2018, as ‘‘National Rosie 

the Riveter Day’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 27, 2018 

Mr. HUFFMAN (for himself, Mr. FITZPATRICK, Ms. SPEIER, and Mr. 

DESAULNIER) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 

the Committee on Education and the Workforce 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for designation of March 21, 2018, as 

‘‘National Rosie the Riveter Day’’. 

Whereas ‘‘National Rosie the Riveter Day’’ is a collective national effort to raise awareness of the 16,000,000 women 

working during World War II; 

Whereas Americans have chosen to honor female workers who 

contributed on the home front during World War II; 

Whereas these women left their homes to work or volunteer 

full-time in factories, farms, shipyards, airplane factories, 

banks, and other institutions in support of the military 

overseas; 

Whereas these women worked with the USO and Red Cross, 

drove trucks, riveted airplane parts, collected critical materials, rolled bandages, and served on rationing boards; 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 756 IH 

Whereas it is fitting and proper to recognize and preserve the 

history and legacy of working women, including volunteer 

women, during World War II to promote cooperation and 

fellowship among such women and their descendants; 

Whereas these women and their descendants wish to further 

the advancement of patriotic ideas, excellence in the 

workplace, and loyalty to the United States of America; 

and 

Whereas March 21, 2018, during Women’s History Month, 

would be an appropriate date to designate as ‘‘National 

Rosie the Riveter Day’’: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) supports the designation of ‘‘National Rosie 

3 the Riveter Day’’; and 

4 (2) acknowledges the important role played by 

5 women in World War II. 

Æ 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
H. Res. 588

In the House of Representatives, U.S., 

December 8, 2005.

Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it 

shall be in order without intervention of any point of order 

to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 4297) to provide for 

reconciliation pursuant to section 201(b) of the concurrent 

resolution on the budget for fiscal year 2006. The bill shall 

be considered as read. The amendment in the nature of a 

substitute recommended by the Committee on Ways and 

Means now printed in the bill shall be considered as adopted. 

The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the 

bill, as amended, to final passage without intervening motion 

except: (1) one hour of debate on the bill, as amended, equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on Ways and Means; (2) the 

amendment in the nature of a substitute printed in the report 

of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution, if 

offered by Representative Rangel of New York or his designee, which shall be in order without intervention of any 

point of order, shall be considered as read, and shall be sepa-
2

•HRES 588 EH 

rately debatable for one hour equally divided and controlled 

by the proponent and an opponent; and (3) one motion to recommit with or without instructions. 

Attest:

Clerk.
2007-1271.

#### Howard v. Howard.

Pike App. No. 06CA755, 2007-0hio-3940. Reported at 115 Ohio St.3d 1443, 2007-Ohio-5567, 875 N.E.2d 103. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.

Pfeifer, J., dissents.
§ 5.515 Compensation. A recipient shall not make or enforce any policy or practice that, on the basis of sex: ( a ) Makes distinctions in rates of pay or other compensation;
( b ) Results in the payment of wages to employees of one sex at a rate less than that paid to employees of the opposite sex for equal work on jobs the performance of which requires equal skill, effort, and responsibility, and that are performed under similar working conditions.
Exhibit 32



                        President's Written Certification
                             Of Financial Statements
                       Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Statute 1350



     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Statute 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity
as president of 4net Software, Inc. (the "Company") that

     (a)  the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-QSB for the period
          ended March 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section
          13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

     (b)  the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end
          of such period and the results of operations of the Company for such
          period.



Dated: May 13, 2005



                                            /s/ Steven N. Bronson
                                            ----------------------------------
                                            Steven N. Bronson, President
Exhibit 10.23



Exhibit 10.23



 

Description of Director Compensation


Fees.  Directors who are not employees of the Company receive fees of $40,000 annually. All such fees are paid in cash. Directors who are also employees of the Company receive no fees for their service on the Board. All Directors are entitled to reimbursement for their reasonable out-of-pocket travel expenditures. 


Equity Grants.  Pursuant to the Non-Employee Director's Stock Grant Plan, Directors who are not employees of the Company are credited annually with 5,000 shares of the Company's common stock. One quarter of these shares, or 1,250 shares, are credited to a Director's account on the last business day of each calendar quarter. Delivery of the shares credited to a Director is deferred until such Director ceases to serve as a Director. These shares are issued pursuant to the Plan. 


Chairman's Fee.  Mr. Donald P. Aiken serves as Chairman of the Board. In addition to receiving the Director compensation described above, Mr. Aiken receives a fee of $12,500 per month for his services as Chairman.


Deferrals.  Under an amended Agreement for Deferment of Director Fees, each non-employee Director may elect to defer all or part of the Director's annual retainer fees and Board and committee meeting attendance fees until a future date selected by the Director. Until the termination of the Gerber Scientific, Inc. 1992 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan in August 2002, a Director could elect to have the deferral held in cash, on which interest accrues at market rates, or in shares of the common stock issued under that plan.  From the termination of the 1992 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan in August 2002 until January 1, 2006, the Agreement provided that deferred amounts would only be held in cash, on which interest would accrue at a rate equal to the pre-tax equivalent yield on the Company's combined short-term and long-term investment portfolios or, in the absence of such portfolios, at a LIBOR-based rate.  Amendments to the Agreement adopted in December 2005 provide that non-employee directors will have the option, from and after January 1, 2006, to have amounts deferred be held in shares of the common stock issued under the Agreement or in cash, on which interest accrues at a LIBOR-based rate.  The Agreement provides for dividends to be credited on the shares of the common stock held in a Director's share account established in accordance with the Agreement.  The amended Agreement provides that a total of 100,000 shares of common stock may be issued pursuant to the Agreement.
# EUR-Lex - 31991D0637 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31991D0637

**91/637/EEC: Commission Decision of 3 December 1991 establishing the model for the message to be transmitted by means of the computerized network Animo' **

*
Official Journal L 343 , 13/12/1991 P. 0046 - 0047 Finnish special edition: Chapter 3 Volume 39 P. 0208 Swedish special edition: Chapter 3 Volume 39 P. 0208 *

COMMISSION DECISION of 3 December 1991 establishing the model for the message to be transmitted by means of the computerized network 'Animo' (91/637/EEC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community,

Having regard to Council Directive 90/425/EEC of 26 June 1990 concerning veterinary and zootechnical checks applicable in intra-Community trade in certain live animals and products with a view to the completion of the internal market (1), as last amended by Regulation (EEC) No 91/496/EEC (2), and in particular Article 20 (3) thereof,

Whereas on 19 July 1991 the Commission adopted Decision 91/398/EEC on a computerized network linking veterinary authorities (Animo) (3);

Whereas, in order to ensure the smooth functioning of the network, a model should be established for the message to be transmitted by the competent veterinary authorities;

Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Veterinary Committee,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The message to be transmitted by means of the computerized network Animo shall be in accordance with the model in the Annex.

Article 2

This Decision shall be reviewed before 31 December 1992 in the light of the development of the veterinary rules and in particular those concerning certification requirements.

Article 3

This Decision is addressed to the Member States. Done at Brussels, 3 December 1991. For the Commission

Ray MAC SHARRY

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ No L 224, 18. 8. 1990, p. 29. (2) OJ No L 268, 24. 9. 1991, p. 56. (3) OJ No L 221, 9. 8. 1991, p. 30.

ANNEX

MODEL FOR THE MESSAGE

1. Date of transmissin

2. Origin

- Country code - unit code

- Health certificate

- Number

- Date

- Name of veterinarian signing the certificate

3. Destination

- Country code - unit code

- Receiver and address of place of destination

4. Merchandise

- Type - code

- Number/quantity

5. Means of transport

- Type of transport (lorry, train, plane, ship, etc.)

- Identification of means of transport (registration of lorry, wagon number, flight number, name of vessel, container number, etc.)

6. Observations

[In particular, for frontier inspection posts: origin of animals and products.]
La ley...

Una persona de los Estados Unidos que tenga un interés financiero o 

autoridad de firma u otra autoridad sobre la(s) cuenta(s) financiera(s) 

ubicada(s) fuera de los Estados Unidos, tiene que presentar un Informe 

de cuentas bancarias y financieras en el extranjero (FBAR, por sus siglas 

en inglés), si el valor agregado de estas cuentas supera los $10,000 en 

cualquier momento durante el año calendario.

Cómo cumplir con la ley...

• Conteste las preguntas relacionadas con el FBAR sobre las 

declaraciones de impuestos federales y las declaraciones 

informativas. Por ejemplo, marque la casilla en la Parte III del Anexo 

B del Formulario 1040(SP) o 1040-SR(SP).

• Presente un FBAR completo y exacto utilizando el sistema de 

presentación electrónica de Financial Crimes Enforcement Network

(Red contra los delitos financieros, o FinCEN, por sus siglas 

en inglés), para los formularios de la Ley de Secreto Bancario, 

disponible en www.fincen.gov, en inglés. Comuníquese con la 

Sección de Apoyo con las Normas de FinCEN (800-949-2732 o al 

703-905-3975) si tiene preguntas sobre cómo presentar el FBAR.

• Presente el FBAR para el 15 de abril del año siguiente al año 

calendario que se informa.

Para obtener ayuda...

Visite www.irs.gov/espanol, o www.fincen.gov, en inglés, 

para ver información, instrucciones, prórrogas de presentación y 

otros recursos para el FBAR. Para las preguntas generales sobre los 

requisitos de presentación del FBAR o los métodos de presentación, 

llame a la línea directa del IRS referente al FBAR (866-270-0733 o 

al 313-234-6146). Para las preguntas técnicas sobre el sistema de 

presentación electrónica, comuníquese con la FinCEN, 866-346-9478 

o BSAEFilingHelp@fincen.gov.

¿Tiene una cuenta financiera en 

el extranjero?

Publication 4261 (sp) (Rev. 7-2021) Catalog Number 38248M

Department of the Treasury Internal Revenue Service www.irs.gov

Es posible que deba informar la cuenta al 

Departamento del Tesoro.
#### In re Estate of Charles M. Bump, Deceased. Laura George Watson, Appellee, v. Edward R. Monroe, Appellant.

Gen. No. 41,098.

opinion filed June 19, 1940.

George Delbert Gray and William H. Haight, for appellant; J. Paul Dunne, for appellee.

Opinion by

Presiding Justice Denis E. Sullivan.

“Not to be published in full.”
§ 780.34 Criteria for decision to issue a license. A license shall issue to the applicant to use the invention covered by the patent declared to be affected with the public interest pursuant to subsection 153b(2) of the Act upon a final decision that: ( a ) The activities to which the patent license is proposed to be applied are of primary importance to the applicant's conduct of an activity authorized under the Act; and
( b ) The applicant has made efforts to obtain reasonable commercial terms and conditions and such efforts have not been successful within a reasonable period of time. The requirement to make such efforts may be waived by the Board in the case of a national emergency or other circumstances of extreme urgency or in cases of public non-commercial use. Where this requirement is waived due to national emergency or other circumstances of extreme urgency, the owner of the patent shall be notified as soon as reasonably practicable. Where this requirement is waived for a public non-commercial use, the owner of the patent shall be notified promptly.
[46 FR 39581, Aug. 4, 1981, as amended at 58 FR 68734, Dec. 29, 1993]
| Bipolar Disorder
***Decade of the Brain***Describes the disorder; gives signs and symptoms, types of treatment, andhow to find help.  It is useful for distribution in health units, mentalhealth centers, physicians' offices, etc. 12p. Reprinted 1995   NIH 95-3679|  Full Text |  Order from NIMH  |

Bipolar Disorder Research at the NIMH
Going to Extremes: Manic Depressive Illness,  Science On Our Minds series
**NIMH Clinical Trial -**Bipolar (Manic-Depressive) Disorder Treatment Effectiveness Study
Child and Adolescent Bipolar Disorder: An Update from the NIMH
Early Recognition and Treatment of Schizophrenia and Bipolar Disorder In Children and Adolescents -- **Workshop Summary**, May, 1999 
Genetics and Mental Disorders,  Bipolar Fact Sheet

Bipolar Disorder Information from NLM's Medline Plus |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
#### § 708.43 Affirmative duty not to retaliate.

DOE contractors will not retaliate against any employee because the employee (or any person acting at the request of the employee) has taken an action listed in § 708.5(a) through (c).
~y,S~~J srRTFm 

< ~ 

i e 

o~ 

~f~TA L PAOtti`'\ 

l€Nl1`ED S°lATES ENVSPOtdMENTAL PROTECSION AGENC'l 

W6aS71NGTflN, D.C. 20460 

OFFICE OF 

AiR AND RADIATiON 

David Moodv, Ph.D., Manager 

Carlsbad Field Office 

U.S. Department of Energy 

P.O. Box 3090 

Carlsbad_ New Mexieo 88221-3090 

Dear Dr. Moody: 

During the week of January 8, 2007, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

performed inspeetions of the Department of Energy's (DOE) Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) 

waste management and storage operations, and waste emplacement operations in preparation for 

the first receipt of remote-handled (RH) waste (EPA Docket No. A-98-49, I1-B-101). These 

inspections were performed under the authority of 40 CFR 194.21 and 40 CFR Part 191, 

Subpart A. 

EPA's inspection verified that DOE will be able to effectively monitor radiation releases 

to members of the public due to both normal operation and any unplanned or accidental releases, 

as a result of the disposal of RH waste at WIPP. EPA's inspection examined WIPP's emission 

control devices and the methods used to estimate radiation doses to the public. EPA did not 

identify any findings or concerns. 

EPA's inspection also verified that DOE can emplace RH waste according to its 

emplacement plan and that adequate procedures are in plaee for RH. Although EPA did not 

identify any findings or concerns during the inspection. EPA noted that the emplacement 

procedure(s) for 10-160B processing are not yet finalized. EPA is requiring DOE to provide the 

final procedure(s) for 10-160B processing prior to their implementation. 

Copies of the enciosed inspection reports will be placed in the EPA public dockets. If 

you have any questions regarding the enclosed reports, please eall Chuck Byrum at (214) 665- 

7555. 

Sincerely 

' f ~ 

Juan Reyes, Direocf r

~ 

Radiation Protection Division 

Enclosures 

internetAdtlress{URL)f trttp:?lwww.epa.gov 

Recyc3edt9ecyciaDie g Psinted ov18h Jeget:4le 0 ~ 1 9ased hnks on 100°L-Postconsarr.er , Pra;ess Chlorina Fres Recyc;ed Paper 
cc: (Electronic Distribution) 

Russ Patterson, DOE/CBFO 

Steve Casey, DOE/CBFO 

Steve Zappe, NMED 

EPA Docket
2008-0305.

#### Plazamill Ltd. Partnership v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of Revision.

Board of Tax Appeals, No. 2006-M-398.
#### § 835.104 Written procedures.

Written procedures shall be developed and implemented as necessary to ensure compliance with this part, commensurate with the radiological hazards created by the activity and consistent with the education, training, and skills of the individuals exposed to those hazards.

[63 FR 59682, Nov. 4, 1998]
Editorial Note on Part 9
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 9 appear at 82 FR 52825, Nov. 15, 2017.

§ 9.45 Annual report to the Attorney General of the United States and Director of the Office of Government Information Services. ( a ) On or before February 1 of each year, the NRC will submit a report covering the preceding fiscal year to the Attorney General of the United States and to the Director of the Office of Government Information Services which shall include the information required by 5 U.S.C. 552(e)(1).
( b ) The NRC will make its annual FOIA reports available to the public at the NRC Web site, *http://www.nrc.gov .*
[81 FR 96347, Dec. 30, 2016]
#### § 625.1 Application and purpose.

This part shall apply to all price competitive sales of SPR petroleum by DOE. This section provides the rules for developing standard contract terms and conditions and financial and performance responsibility measures; notifying potential purchasers of those terms, conditions and measures; choosing applicable terms, conditions and measures for each sale of SPR petroleum; and notifying potential purchasers of which terms, conditions and measures will be applicable to particular sales of SPR petroleum.
From: Barry.Hammer@faa.gov [ mailto:Barry.Hammer@faa.gov] 

Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2012 10: 12 AM 

To: Maguire, Russ 

Cc: Willenborg, Christopher (DOT); Klay, Tracy (DOT) 

Subject: Request for Review of Sub-Lease Assignment Interest - BEH, LLC 

Russ, 

I've reviewed the information you provided with your October 20, 2012 letter regarding the assignment, 

assumption, and amendment of a Swift Aviation, Inc. lease to Boston Executive Helicopters LLC. 

Firstly, it's important to note that our review of the lease is performed as a courtesy and while we try to 

identifY potential compliance issues, our review can not protect the airport from any compliance 

violations that may result due to the terms ofthis lease. 

While I don't see any glaring problems with most of the terms and conditions of the lease provided in Tab 

B, the justification for the 39 year term is not sufficient. The FAA allows sponsors to enter into long-term 

lease agreements (not to exceed 50-years) provided longer terms are reasonably necessary to amortize a 

tenant's investment. The Patrick J. O'Malley letter dated September 6, 2012 and provided in Tab E 

identifies a reasonable depreciation of the tenant's anticipated improvements to the leased parcel, 

however, justification for a 39-year term would require an amortization schedule with reasonable rates 

and payments. 

Here's an excerpt from the FAA's Compliance Manual regarding reasonable terms: "Most tenant ground 

leases of30 to 35 years are sufficient to retire a tenant's initial financing and provide a reasonable return 

for the tenant's development of major facilities." 

Certainly this statement provides for some subjectivity with respect to reasonable terms and major 

facilities, however by requiring an amortization schedule with longer leases the airport will be able to 

better justifY the term. 

Please don't hesitate to call or email with any questions. 

Respectfully, 

Barry J. Hammer, P.E. 

FAA Airports Division 

12 New England Executive Park