alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 708.28 Hearing procedures. ( a ) In all hearings under this part: ( 1 ) Testimony of witnesses is given under oath or affirmation, and witnesses must be advised of the applicability of 18 U.S.C. 1001 and 18 U.S.C. 1621, dealing with the criminal penalties associated with false statements and perjury;
( 2 ) Witnesses are subject to cross-examination; and
( 3 ) A court reporter will make a transcript of the hearing.
( b ) The Administrative Judge has all powers necessary to regulate the conduct of proceedings, including the following. ( 1 ) The Administrative Judge may order discovery at the request of a party, based on a showing that the requested discovery is designed to produce evidence regarding a matter, not privileged, that is relevant to the subject matter of the complaint.
( 2 ) The Administrative Judge may permit parties to obtain discovery by any appropriate method, including deposition upon oral examination or written questions; written interrogatories; production of documents or things; permission to enter upon land or other property for inspection and other purposes; and requests for admission.
( 3 ) The Administrative Judge may issue subpoenas for the appearance of witnesses on behalf of either party, or for the production of specific documents or other physical evidence.
( 4 ) The Administrative Judge may rule on objections to the presentation of evidence; exclude evidence that is immaterial, irrelevant, or unduly repetitious; require the advance submission of documents offered as evidence; dispose of procedural requests; grant extensions of time; determine the format of the hearing; direct that written motions, documents, or briefs be filed with respect to issues raised during the course of the hearing; ask questions of witnesses; direct that documentary evidence be served upon other parties (under protective order if such evidence is deemed confidential); and otherwise regulate the conduct of the hearing.
( 5 ) The Administrative Judge may, at the request of a party or on his own initiative, dismiss a claim, defense, or party. He may also make adverse findings upon the failure of a party or the party's representative to comply with a lawful order of the Administrative Judge, or, without good cause, to attend a hearing. If the Administrative Judge's rulings result in termination of the proceeding prior to the completion of the hearing, the Administrative Judge will issue an initial agency decision pursuant to § 708.31 of this subpart.
( 6 ) The Administrative Judge, upon request of a party, may allow the parties a reasonable time to file pre-hearing briefs or written statements with respect to material issues of fact or law. Any pre-hearing submission must be limited to the issues specified and filed within the time prescribed by the Administrative Judge.
( 7 ) The parties are entitled to make closing arguments, but post-hearing submissions are only permitted by direction of the Administrative Judge.
( 8 ) Parties allowed to file written submissions must serve copies upon the other parties within the time prescribed by the Administrative Judge.
#### § 835.4 Radiological units.

Unless otherwise specified, the quantities used in the records required by this part shall be clearly indicated in special units of curie, rad, roentgen, or rem, including multiples and subdivisions of these units, or other conventional units, such as, dpm, dpm/100 cm2 or mass units. The SI units, becquerel (Bq), gray (Gy), and sievert (Sv), may be provided parenthetically for reference with scientific standards.

[72 FR 31925, June 8, 2007]
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 246 (Thursday, December 23, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 80812]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-32501]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION


Sunshine Act Meeting

    Pursuant to the provisions of the ``Government in the Sunshine 
Act'' (5 U.S.C. 552b), notice is hereby given that at 11:10 a.m. on 
Tuesday, December 14, 2010, the Board of Directors of the Federal 
Deposit Insurance Corporation met in closed session to consider matters 
related to the Corporation's supervision, corporate and resolution 
activities.
    In calling the meeting, the Board determined, on motion of Vice 
Chairman Martin J. Gruenberg, seconded by Director John E. Bowman 
(Acting Director, Office of Thrift Supervision), concurred in by 
Director Thomas J. Curry (Appointive), Director John G. Walsh (Acting 
Comptroller of the Currency), and Chairman Sheila C. Bair, that 
Corporation business required its consideration of the matters which 
were to be the subject of this meeting on less than seven days' notice 
to the public; that no earlier notice of the meeting was practicable; 
that the public interest did not require consideration of the matters 
in a meeting open to public observation; and that the matters could be 
considered in a closed meeting by authority of subsections (c)(2), 
(c)(4), (c)(6), (c)(8), (c)(9)(A)(ii), (c)(9)(B), and (c)(10) of the 
``Government in the Sunshine Act'' (5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(2), (c)(4), 
(c)(6), (c)(8), (c)(9)(A)(ii), (c)(9)(B), and (c)(10)).
    The meeting was held in the Board Room of the FDIC Building located 
at 550--17th Street, NW., Washington, DC.

    Dated: December 14, 2010.

    Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

Valerie J. Best,
Assistant Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-32501 Filed 12-21-10; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE P
DPN



Exhibit 4.2(1)

DEMAND PROMISSORY NOTE

US$20,000



In consideration of receiving a loan of US$20,000, the undersigned Reperio Exploration Inc. of 650 - 1500 West Georgia Street, Vancouver, BC, V6G 2Z6, does hereby PROMISE TO PAY to Joanna Kotsiris of 10802 155 Street, Surrey, BC, V3R 6J1, the sum of US$20,000, without interest, payable on demand. 

The undersigned and each endorser hereof waives demand and presentment for payment, notice of dishonor, notice of nonpayment, protest and notice of this Promissory Note.

DATED at Vancouver, British Columbia, this 30th day of January, 2006.


 

	
/s/"Alex Kurenov"
	
/s/ "Gord Samson"

	
(Name of Witness)
	
Gord Samson, President

	
Signature of Witness
	
Reperio Exploration Inc.
§ 830.204 Documented safety analysis. ( a ) The contractor responsible for a Hazard Category 1, 2, or 3 DOE nuclear facility must obtain approval from DOE for the methodology used to prepare the documented safety analysis for the facility unless the contractor uses a methodology set forth in Table 1 of Appendix A to this part.
( b ) The documented safety analysis for a Hazard Category 1, 2, or 3 DOE nuclear facility must, as appropriate for the complexities and hazards associated with the facility: ( 1 ) Describe the facility (including the design of safety structures, systems and components) and the work to be performed;
( 2 ) Provide a systematic identification of both natural and man-made hazards associated with the facility;
( 3 ) Evaluate normal, abnormal, and accident conditions, including consideration of natural and man-made external events, identification of energy sources or processes that might contribute to the generation or uncontrolled release of radioactive and other hazardous materials, and consideration of the need for analysis of accidents which may be beyond the design basis of the facility;
( 4 ) Derive the hazard controls necessary to ensure adequate protection of workers, the public, and the environment, demonstrate the adequacy of these controls to eliminate, limit, or mitigate identified hazards, and define the process for maintaining the hazard controls current at all times and controlling their use;
( 5 ) Define the characteristics of the safety management programs necessary to ensure the safe operation of the facility, including (where applicable) quality assurance, procedures, maintenance, personnel training, conduct of operations, emergency preparedness, fire protection, waste management, and radiation protection; and
( 6 ) With respect to a nonreactor nuclear facility with fissionable material in a form and amount sufficient to pose a potential for criticality, define a criticality safety program that: ( i ) Ensures that operations with fissionable material remain subcritical under all normal and credible abnormal conditions;
( ii ) Identifies applicable nuclear criticality safety standards; and
( iii ) Describes how the program meets applicable nuclear criticality safety standards.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000812076               
<NAME>                        TOPPS
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              FEB-27-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   NOV-28-1998
<CASH>                                              44,138
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       34,802
<ALLOWANCES>                                         1,281
<INVENTORY>                                         15,666                                    
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    99,103
<PP&E>                                              13,144
<DEPRECIATION>                                       5,458
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     170,838
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               75,012
<BONDS>                                             10,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  475
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                               0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       170,838
<SALES>                                             67,647
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    67,964
<CGS>                                               41,102
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       60,312
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       110
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     395
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      7,257
<INCOME-TAX>                                         3,123
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  4,134
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                         4,134
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          .09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          .09
        


</TABLE>
**RB** IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 19 - 0683 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. LYNDSEY LALICKER ,

Defendant and Appellant.

**GRANT OF EXTENSION** Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 30 - day extension of time, and good cause appearing therefor, Appellee is gran ted an extension of time to and including September 25 , 20 2 1 , within which to prepare, serve, and file its response brief.

Electronically signed by: Bowen Greenwood Clerk of the Supreme Court August 18 2021

08/18/2021

Case Number: DA 19-0683
§ 830.205 Technical safety requirements. ( a ) A contractor responsible for a Hazard Category 1, 2, or 3 DOE nuclear facility must: ( 1 ) Develop technical safety requirements that are derived from the documented safety analysis;
( 2 ) Prior to use, obtain DOE approval of technical safety requirements and any change to technical safety requirements; and
( 3 ) Notify DOE of any violation of a technical safety requirement.
( b ) A contractor may take emergency actions that depart from an approved technical safety requirement when no actions consistent with the technical safety requirement are immediately apparent, and when these actions are needed to protect workers, the public or the environment from imminent and significant harm. Such actions must be approved by a certified operator for a reactor or by a person in authority as designated in the technical safety requirements for nonreactor nuclear facilities. The contractor must report the emergency actions to DOE as soon as practicable.
( c ) A contractor for an environmental restoration activity may follow the provisions of 29 CFR 1910.120 or 29 CFR 1926.65 to develop the appropriate hazard controls (rather than the provisions for technical safety requirements in paragraph (a) of this section), provided the activity involves either: ( 1 ) Work not done within a permanent structure, or
( 2 ) The decommissioning of a facility with only low-level residual fixed radioactivity.
§ 71.85 Preliminary determinations. Before the first use of any packaging for the shipment of licensed material— ( a ) The certificate holder shall ascertain that there are no cracks, pinholes, uncontrolled voids, or other defects that could significantly reduce the effectiveness of the packaging;
( b ) Where the maximum normal operating pressure will exceed 35 kPa (5 lbf/in2) gauge, the certificate holder shall test the containment system at an internal pressure at least 50 percent higher than the maximum normal operating pressure, to verify the capability of that system to maintain its structural integrity at that pressure;
( c ) The certificate holder shall conspicuously and durably mark the packaging with its model number, serial number, gross weight, and a package identification number assigned by the NRC. Before applying the model number, the certificate holder shall determine that the packaging has been fabricated in accordance with the design approved by the Commission; and
( d ) The licensee shall ascertain that the determinations in paragraphs (a) through (c) of this section have been made.
[60 FR 50264, Sept. 28, 1995, as amended at 80 FR 34013, June 12, 2015]
EXHIBIT 35.1  ANNUAL SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT PURSUANT TO ITEM 1123 OF REGULATION AB

CARMAX BUSINESS SERVICES, LLC

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of CarMax Business Services, LLC, as Servicer pursuant to Section 3.10 of the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of February 1, 2013 (the Sale and
Servicing Agreement) among CarMax Auto Owner Trust 2013-1, as Issuer (the Issuer), CarMax Auto Funding LLC, as Depositor, CarMax Business Services, LLC, as Servicer (the Servicer), and Wells Fargo Bank, National
Association, as Backup Servicer, does hereby certify that:



| | 1. | CarMax Business Services, LLC is, as of the date hereof, the Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The undersigned is duly authorized to execute and deliver this Officers Certificate.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 3. | A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period beginning on February 14, 2013 and ending on February 28, 2013 and of the Servicers performance under
the Sale and Servicing Agreement was made under my supervision. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Sale and Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout such
period.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Capitalized terms used in this
certificate and not otherwise defined herein have the meanings assigned to them in the Sale and Servicing Agreement.

IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of the Servicer, has duly executed this Officers Certificate this 24th day of May, 2013.



CARMAX BUSINESS SERVICES, LLC/s/ Thomas W. ReedyThomas W. Reedy
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
and Treasurer
Editorial Note on Part 63
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 63 appear at 81 FR 86909, Dec. 2, 2016.

§ 63.204 Preclosure standard. DOE must ensure that no member of the public in the general environment receives more than an annual dose of 0.15 mSv (15 mrem) from the combination of: ( a ) Management and storage (as defined in 40 CFR 191.2) of radioactive material that: ( 1 ) Is subject to 40 CFR 191.3(a); and
( 2 ) Occurs outside of the Yucca Mountain repository but within the Yucca Mountain site; and
( b ) Storage (as defined in § 63.202) of radioactive material inside the Yucca Mountain repository.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 248 (Tuesday, December 28, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 81631]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-32631]



[[Page 81631]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Microbiology, Infectious Diseases and AIDS 
Initial Review Group. Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research 
Committee.
    Date: February 16-17, 2011.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Embassy Suites Hotel, 4300 Military Road, NW., 
Washington, DC 20015.
    Contact Person: Michelle M. Timmerman, PhD, Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Program, DEA/NIAID/NIH/DHHS, Room 2217, 
6700B Rockledge Drive, MSC-7616, Bethesda, MD 20892-7616. 301-451-
4573. <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#88fce1e5e5edfae5e9e6e5c8e6e1e9e1eca6e6e1e0a6efe7fe"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="5c28353131392e313d32311c32353d353872323534723b332a">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: December 21, 2010.
Jennifer S. Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2010-32631 Filed 12-27-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### § 709.21 Requirements for notification of a polygraph examination.

When a polygraph examination is scheduled, the DOE must notify the covered person, in writing, of the date, time, and place of the polygraph examination, the provisions for a medical waiver, and the covered person's right to obtain and consult with legal counsel or to secure another representative prior to the examination. DOE must provide a copy of this part to the covered person. The covered person must receive the notification at least ten days, excluding weekend days and holidays, before the time of the examination except when good cause is shown or when the covered person waives the advance notice provision.
#### § 603.630 Use Federally approved indirect cost rates for for-profit firms.

In accordance with the general policy in § 603.605, the contracting officer must require a for-profit participant that has federally approved indirect cost rates for its Federal procurement contracts to use those rates to accumulate and report costs under an expenditure-based TIA. This includes both provisional and final rates that are approved up until the time that the TIA is closed out.
EXHIBIT 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Lawrence M. Powers, certify that:

1) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of SITI-Sites.com, Inc.
(the "Registrant")

2) Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4) The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

      a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly
report is being prepared;

      b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

      c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation
as of the Evaluation Date;

5) The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the audit committee of registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

      a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified any material
weaknesses in internal controls; and

      b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6) The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date:    November 13, 2003
                                    By  /s/   Lawrence M. Powers
                                        ------------------------
                                        Lawrence M. Powers
                                        Chief Executive Officer and
                                        Chairman of the Board of Directors

                                       12
#### MAGEE, Respondent, v. MAGEE, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

January 15, 1915.)

Action by Florence Deems Magee against Belmont Burdette Magee.

No opinion. Order modified, by reducing the amount of the alimony to $60 per month, and the counsel fee to $300, and, as so modified, affirmed, without costs.