alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<CIK>                         0000764763
<NAME>                        TRIANGLE IMAGING GROUP, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         592,540
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  616,927
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1,217,926
<PP&E>                                         207,924
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 3,324,268
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          1,219,102
<BONDS>                                        1,250,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    10,000
<COMMON>                                       8,950
<OTHER-SE>                                     585,923
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   3,324,268
<SALES>                                        2,588,958
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               3,324,268
<CGS>                                          625,142
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  625,142
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               1,631,370
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             52,784
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                279,662
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            279,662
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   279,662
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .04
        


</TABLE>
```

[109th Congress Public Law 327]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ327.109]

[[Page 120 STAT. 1767]]

Public Law 109-327
109th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
    6101 Liberty Road in Baltimore, Maryland, as the ``United States 
   Representative Parren J. Mitchell Post Office''. <<NOTE: Oct. 12, 
                         2006 -  [H.R. 4109]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. UNITED STATES REPRESENTATIVE PARREN J. MITCHELL POST 
                              OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 6101 Liberty Road in Baltimore, Maryland, shall be known and 
designated as the ``United States Representative Parren J. Mitchell Post 
Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``United 
States Representative Parren J. Mitchell Post Office''.

    Approved October 12, 2006.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 4109:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD:
                                                        Vol. 151 (2005):
                                    Dec. 18, considered and passed 
                                        House.
                                                        Vol. 152 (2006):
                                    Sept. 29, considered and passed 
                                        Senate.

                                  <all>
```
-86 -84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72

 32

 34

 36

 38

 40

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲

▲ ▲

▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 500

18 12 06 00

08/16

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 16 Aug 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.54 N 76.62 W Meters AGL
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Furman Franks, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered December 1, 1965, dismissed. Subsequent to the rendition of the judgment from which the appeal was taken, and on January 26, 1967, defendant was resentenced *nunc pro tunc*as of December 1, 1965, as a first felony offender. The appealed judgment was therefore superseded and this appeal therefrom must be dismissed. However, we have considered the merits of the appeal and, if we were not dismissing the appeal, we would affirm the appealed judgment. Furthermore, defendant has not appealed from the superseding judgment of January 26, 1967 and his time to appeal therefrom has expired. If a timely appeal therefrom on the same grounds as contended at bar were before us, we would affirm that judgment on the merits. Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, Rabin, Hopkins and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Food and Drug Administration

          - [Docket No. FDA-2010-N-0074]

# AGENCY:

Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a collection of information entitled “Registration and Product Listing for Owners and Operators of Domestic Tobacco Product Establishments and Listing of Ingredients in Tobacco Products” has been approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Jonna Capezzuto, Office of Information Management, Food and Drug Administration, 1350 Piccard Dr., PI50-400B, Rockville, MD 20850, 301-796-3794, e-mail:                         *Jonnalynn.Capezzuto@fda.hhs.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In the                     **Federal Register**                     of May 7, 2010 (75 FR 25267), the Agency announced that the proposed information collection had been submitted to OMB for review and clearance under 44 U.S.C. 3507. An Agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. OMB has now approved the information collection and has assigned OMB control number 0910-0650. The approval expires on December 31, 2012. A copy of the supporting statement for this information collection is available on the Internet at                     *http://www.reginfo.gov/​public/​do/​PRAMain.*

Dated: December 17, 2010.

Leslie Kux,

Acting Assistant Commissioner for Policy.

[FR Doc. 2010-32277 Filed 12-22-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4160-01-P
p. 1 

ACETO 

Aceto Corporation 

4 Tri Harbor Court 

Port Washington, NY 11050 

Tel: (516) 627 6000 

Fax: (516) 627 6093 

www.aceto .com 

February 16, 2011 

Document Control Office (DCO) (7407M) 

Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics (OPPT) 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

1200 Pennsylvania Ave, NW 

Washington, DC 20460-0001 

IIIII,IIIIINIIINIIIII~I~III0 III,I,IIIIIII,IIIIII 

ATTN: TSCA Section 4 - Docket Identification Number EPA-HQ-OPPT-2007-0531 

Re : Application for Exemption, Section 4 Test Rule, Benzenediamine, ar, ar-diethyl-armethyl-, CASH 68479-98-1, Testing of certain high production volume chemicals ; Second group 

of Chemicals, Federal Register, Vol. 76, No. 5, January 7, 2011, 40 CFR 799.5087 

Dear Sir or Madam: 

Aceto Corporation submits this application for exemption from the requirements for testing 

Benzenediamine, ar, ar-diethyl-ar-methyl-, CASH 68479-98-1 under TSCA Section 4 Test Rule as 

noted above. 

As part of our exemption application we are providing the following information : 

(a) The identity of the test rule, the chemical identity, and the CAS No. of the test substance on 

which the application is based. 

Testing of certain high production volume chemicals ; Second group of Chemicals, Federal 

Register, Vol . 76, No. 5, January 7, 2011, 40 CFR 799.5087, Benzenediamine, ar, ar-diethylar-methyl-, CASH 68479-98-1. 

(b) We are requesting an exemption from all testing requirements for Benzenediamine, ar, ardiethyl-ar-methyl-, CASH 68479-98-1 under 40 CFR 799.5087 because we will no longer be 

conducting business activities with this chemical. 

(c) Name, address, and telephone number of applicant. 

ACETO Corporation 

4 Tri Harbor Court 

Port Washington, NY 11050 

516-627-6000 

(d) Name, address, and telephone number of appropriate individual to contact for further information . 

Suhey Francisco . 

Regulatory Affairs Specialist - Environmental, Health, Safety and Regulatory Affairs 

ACETO Corporation 

4 Tri Harbor Court 

Port Washington, NY 11050 

off'1-2-001-as'31 

RECEIVE(, r')!-)T r,`'EC REC'D MAR 11 2011 

I I FEB 23 AM 6: 07 

CONTAINS NO CBI 
516-627-6000 

As per 40 CFR 790 .99, ACETO Corporation provides our Statement of financial responsibility per our 

application for exemption: 

I (ACETO Corporation) understand that if this application is granted before the reimbursement period 

described in section 4(c)(3)(B) of TSCA expires, ACETO Corporation must pay fair and equitable 

reimbursement to the person or persons who incurred or shared in the costs of complying with the 

requirement to submit data and upon whose data the granting of my application was based. 

If you have any further questions please contact me. 

Sincerely, 

Suhey Francisco . 

Regulatory Affairs Specialist - Environmental, Health, Safety and Regulatory Affairs 

ACETO Corporation
Order entered October 1 5 , 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 19
- 00771
- CV ANDREA M. REYES, Appellant

V.
GUADALUPE TORRES AND ROSALINDA SILVA, Appellee s On Appea l from the 193rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC
- 17
- 13110



### O RDER Before the Court is appellant’s October 12, 2019 motion for extension of time to file her opening brief

. The reporter’s record was ordered to be filed October 21, 2019 , but a ppellant explains s he was recently informed no reporter’s record exists for the underlying proceedings

. We rule as follows.
We VACATE our September 30, 2019 order directing court reporter Vielica Dobbins to file the reporter’s reco rd no later than October 21, 2019 and ORDER appellant’s opening brief be filed no later than November 15, 2019.
We DIRECT the Clerk of the Court send a copy of this order to Ms. Dobbins and the parties.
/s/ BILL WHITEHILL JUSTICE
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 11-1368

___________

Joe S. Wesley, *

*

Appellant, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the Eastern

v. * District of Arkansas.

*

Crothall Services Group, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Appellee. *

___________

Submitted: October 5, 2011

Filed: October 11, 2011

___________

Before LOKEN, BYE, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Joe S. Wesley appeals following the district court’s adverse grant ofsummary 1

judgment in his employment-discrimination action, and the subsequent denial of his

motion for reconsideration. Initially, we note that Wesley’s notice of appeal istimely

only as to the order denying reconsideration, see Huggins v. FedEx Ground Package

Sys., Inc., 566 F.3d 771, 773 (8th Cir. 2009) (court is obligated to consider

jurisdiction sua sponte when there is indication that it islacking), because his motion

was filed twenty-nine days after the entry of judgment, and thus did not toll the time

The Honorable Susan Webber Wright, United States District Judge for the

1

Eastern District of Arkansas.
to appeal the underlying grant of summary judgment, see Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(4). 

Finding no abuse of discretion in the denial of reconsideration under Federal Rule of

Civil Procedure 60(b), see Arnold v. Wood, 238 F.3d 992, 998 (8th Cir. 2001) (Rule

60(b) movant must demonstrate exceptional circumstancesjustifying such relief), we

affirm the district court. We also deny Wesley’s motion for remand.

______________________________

-2-
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18,
UNITED STATES CODE) In connection with the Quarterly Report of Del Taco Income Properties IV (the Company) on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned officers of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership. Date: May 13, 2005
    
    /s/ Kevin K. MoriartyKevin K. MoriartyDirector, Chairman andChief Executive OfficerDate: May 13, 2005
    
    /s/ Robert J. TerranoRobert J. TerranoExecutive Vice President,Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         171,519
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      853
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               177,022
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 177,022
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           78,844
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      98,178
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   177,022
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               557,211
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               134,702
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                422,509
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            422,509
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   422,509
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .42
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .42


</TABLE>
#### Michael Seniuk, Individually and as Sheriff of Nassau County, et al., Respondents, v United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company, Appellant.

In an action to declare that defendant has the duty to defend and indemnify plaintiffs in an action against them for personal injuries, defendant appeals from (1) a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered January 3, 1980, which, *inter alia,*granted plaintiffs summary judgment, (2) a further judgment of the same court, entered February 7, 1980, which awarded plaintiffs attorney’s fees, costs and disbursements, and (3) stated portions of a resettled judgment of the same court, entered March 24, 1980. Appeal' from the judgment entered January 3, 1980 dismissed as academic. That judgment was superseded by the resettled judgment. Judgment entered February 7, 1980 affirmed, and resettled judgment affirmed insofar as appealed from. Plaintiffs are awarded one bill of $50 costs and disbursements. The plaintiff in the underlying action alleged that the Sheriff’s Department of Nassau County negligently deprived him of medical care, resulting in an aggravation of his injuries. This constituted an "occurrence” under the insurance policy in question which defines occurrence as "an accident, including continuous or repeated exposure to conditions, which results in bodily injury or property damage neither expected nor intended from the standpoint of the Insured” (see *McGroarty v Great Amer. Ins. Co.,*36 NY2d 358; *Matter of Schechter v State Ins. Fund,*6 NY2d 506). The question of whether the Sheriff’s department acted negligently or intentionally should be determined at the trial of the underlying action (see *Torcivia v United States Fid. & Guar. Co.,*52 AD2d 944; *Allstate Ins. Co. v Szego,*38 AD2d 736; *Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co. v Dennis,*14 AD2d 188). Special Term’s award of attorney’s fees was reasonable (see *Royal Globe Ins. Co. v Dinan,*42 Misc 2d 595). Damiani, J. P., Lazer, Mangano and Cohalan, JJ., concur.
#### § 963.12 Preclosure suitability determination.

DOE will apply the method and criteria described in §§ 963.13 and 963.14 to evaluate the suitability of the Yucca Mountain site for the preclosure period. If DOE finds that the results of the preclosure safety evaluation conducted under § 963.13 show that the Yucca Mountain site is likely to meet the applicable radiation protection standard, DOE may determine the site suitable for the preclosure period.
- Home
- Data Products
- State Fact Sheets
- State Data
#### STUMP v. BURNS.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

December 4, 1914.)

Action by Evelyn A. Stump, as administratrix, against William Burns. C. P. AYilliamson, of New York City, for plaintiff. J. V. Bouvier, Jr., of New York City, for defendant.

PER CURIAM.

Exceptions overruled, motion for new trial denied, with costs, and judgment directed dismissing complaint, with costs. Settle order on notice.

SCOTT and HOTCHKISS, JJ., dissent.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          13,100
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  153,700
<ALLOWANCES>                                     9,600
<INVENTORY>                                    116,800
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               304,500
<PP&E>                                       1,192,500
<DEPRECIATION>                                 608,200
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,094,600
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          161,400
<BONDS>                                        974,700
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       178,900
<OTHER-SE>                                   (270,900)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,094,600
<SALES>                                        870,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               870,000
<CGS>                                          720,900
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  806,600
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (1,400)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              68,200
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,400)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,300)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,100)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,100)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
IIB 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 974 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 14, 2017 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

AN ACT 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to authorize the 

Secretary of Veterans Affairs, in awarding a contract 

for the procurement of goods or services, to give a preference to offerors that employ veterans. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 974 RFS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Boosting Rates of 

3 American Veteran Employment Act’’ or the ‘‘BRAVE 

4 Act’’. 

5 SEC. 2. PREFERENCE FOR OFFERORS EMPLOYING VET6 ERANS. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 81 of 

8 title 38, United States Code, is amended by adding after 

9 section 8128 the following new section: 

10 ‘‘§ 8129. Preference for offerors employing veterans 

11 ‘‘(a) PREFERENCE.—In awarding a contract for the 

12 procurement of goods or services, the Secretary may give 

13 a preference to offerors that employ veterans on a full14 time basis. The Secretary shall determine such preference 

15 based on the percentage of the full-time employees of the 

16 offeror who are veterans. 

17 ‘‘(b) ENFORCEMENT PENALTIES FOR MISREPRESEN18 TATION.—(1) Any offeror that is determined by the Sec19 retary to have willfully and intentionally misrepresented 

20 the veteran status of the employees of the offeror for pur21 poses of subsection (a) may be debarred from contracting 

22 with the Department for a period of not less than 5 years. 

23 ‘‘(2) If the Secretary carries out a debarment under 

24 paragraph (1), the Secretary shall commence debarment 

25 action against the offeror by not later than 30 days after 

26 determining that the offeror willfully and intentionally 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 974 RFS

1 misrepresented the veteran status of the employees of the 

2 offeror as described in paragraph (1) and shall complete 

3 debarment actions against such offeror by not later than 

4 90 days after such determination. 

5 ‘‘(3) The debarment of an offeror under paragraph 

6 (1) includes the debarment of all principals in the offeror 

7 for a period of not less than 5 years.’’. 

8 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

9 at the beginning of such chapter is amended by inserting 

10 after the item relating to section 8128 the following new 

11 item: 

‘‘8129. Preference for offerors employing veterans.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives February 13, 

2017. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS