alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Angeles
Partners 16 1997 Second Quarter 10-QSB and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such 10-QSB filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000812187
<NAME> ANGELES PARTNERS 16
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                             623
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       21
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                          11,786
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,454
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  10,659
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                         13,581
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (5,550)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    10,659
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,336
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,597
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 645
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     79
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 79
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        79
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     5.57<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet.
<F2>Multiplier is 1.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
#### Alfred S. Muller, Respondent, v. Baier Lustgarten, Individually and Doing Business as Middle Island Country Club, Appellant.

Order, entered March 26, 1969, unanimously reversed, on the law and the facts and in the exercise of discretion, without costs or disbursements, and the motion denied, without prejudice to renewal upon a proper factual showing warranting a departure from the statement of readiness rule. (Rules of the Supreme Court, New York and Bronx Counties, part 1, rule IV; 22 NYCRR 660.4.) Plaintiff’s motion for a discovery and inspection of photographs alleged to have been taken by defendant at or about the time of the accident, was made two years after the accident and one year after a statement of readiness had been filed. The present record fails to show the requisite unusual or unanticipated conditions which permit relaxation of the statement of readiness rule. The motion should therefore have been denied. *(Pioneer Jewelry Corp.*v. *All Continent Corp.,*24 A D 2d 436; *Jacobs*v. *Peress,*23 A D 2d 483; *McGuire*v. *Pick,*8 A D 2d 800; *Price*v. *Brody,*7 A D 2d 204.) Concur — Eager, J. P., Capozzoli, Tilzer, Markewieh and .Nunez, JJ.
###### Editorial Note on Part 51

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 51 appear at 80 FR 74980, Dec. 1, 2015.

#### § 51.3 Resolution of conflict.

In any conflict between a general rule in subpart A of this part and a special rule in another subpart of this part or another part of this chapter applicable to a particular type of proceeding, the special rule governs.
#### § 626.3 Applicability.

The procedures in this part apply to the acquisition of petroleum products by DOE for the Strategic Petroleum Reserve through purchase or exchange, as well as to deferrals of contractually scheduled deliveries.
#### Elizabeth J. O’Connor, Respondent, v. Goodrich-Rosensheim Co., Inc., et al., Defendants, Big Scot Associates, Inc., Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant, et al., Third-Party Defendants. (And Another Title.)

Judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, dated November 22, 1968, affirmed. No opinion. Appeal from order of the same court, made in Orange County on November 21, 1968, and entered in Dutchess County November 22,1968, dismissed. An order denying a motion to set aside a verdict, made only on the trial minutes, is not appealable. In any event, the contentions urged with respect to the motion were considered on the appeal from the judgment. One bill of costs is allowed to respondent to cover both appeals. Brennan, Acting P. J., Rabin, Hopkins, Benjamin and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit 32.2**
WESTCORP
CERTIFICATION OF CFO
In connection with the Quarterly Report of Westcorp (the “Company”) on Form10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, to the best of hisknowledge and belief and pursuant to 18 U.S.C., Chapter 63, Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes–Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and result of operationsof the Company.
The foregoing Certification is furnished solely for purposes of complying withthe provisions of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and is not intended tobe used for any other purpose.
**WESTCORP** /s/ Lee A. WhatcottLee A. WhatcottExecutive Vice President,Chief Financial Officer andChief Operating Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)   Date: August 6, 2004
Exhibit
32





Certification
Pursuant to 18. U.S.C. Section 1350,


As
Adopted Pursuant to


Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In
connection with the quarterly report of Banyan Rail Services Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2010(the “Report”) filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Gary O.
Marino, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Larry
Forman, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of § 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Gary O. MarinoGary
      O. MarinoChairman
      and Chief Executive Officer/s/ Larry FormanLarry
      FormanVice
      President andChief
      Financial OfficerAugust
      16, 2010
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM SPECTRUM
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCICAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           1,846
<SECURITIES>                                     2,195
<RECEIVABLES>                                      258
<ALLOWANCES>                                        86
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 4,557
<PP&E>                                             556
<DEPRECIATION>                                     365
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   4,748
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,431
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          1
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,945
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     4,748
<SALES>                                             53
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   165
<CGS>                                               23
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       23
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (996)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (996)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (996)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.92)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.92)
        

</TABLE>
#### MACK, Respondent, v. ASTORIA VENEER MILLS & DOCK CO., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

November 27, 1914.)

Action by Daniel Mack against the Astoria Veneer Mills & Dock Company.

No opinion. Judgment and order of the County Court of Queens County reversed, and new trial ordered, costs to abide the event, on the ground that the evidence failed to establish the negligence of defendant.
IV 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 696 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that there should 

be established a National Physical Education and Sports Week and 

a National Physical Education and Sports Month. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 16, 2006 

Mr. UDALL of Colorado (for himself and Mr. WAMP) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Government Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that 

there should be established a National Physical Education and Sports Week and a National Physical Education and Sports Month. 

Whereas many residents of the United States would improve 

the quality of their lives through proper exercise and diet; 

Whereas obesity-related diseases cost the United States economy more than $100,000,000,000 every year; 

Whereas physical activity reduces risk, at all ages, of heart 

disease, high blood pressure, and diabetes; 

Whereas almost half of individuals aged 12 through 21, and 

more than a third of high school students, do not participate in vigorous physical activity on a regular basis; 


rfake on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 696 IH 

Whereas physical activity is necessary to support normal 

growth in children and is essential to the continuing 

health and well-being of youth and adults; 

Whereas the 60 million school-aged children and youth in the 

United States have the potential to acquire the knowledge, skills, and values that can lead to a lifetime of 

physically active and heathy living; 

Whereas in a 1996 report on physical activity and health, the 

Surgeon General of the United States Public Health 

Service verified that regular physical activity is associated 

with improved health-related quality of life; 

Whereas it would be appropriate to recognize May 1 through 

7, 2006, as National Physical Education and Sports 

Week; and 

Whereas the month of May has traditionally been recognized 

as National Physical Education and Sports Month to encourage broader promotion of physical fitness activities 

and programs in schools, parks, recreation departments, 

employee associations, hospitals, and other entities involved in physical fitness: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that there should be established— 

3 (1) a National Physical Education and Sports 

4 Week; and 

5 (2) a National Physical Education and Sports 

6 Month. 

Æ 


rfake on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
# L_2023240EN.01010801.xml

| 28.9.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 240/108 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.9.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 240/108

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE No 232/2020

of 11 December 2020

amending Annex XX (Environment) to the EEA Agreement [2023/2034]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/22 of 31 October 2019 amending Annexes I and III to Regulation (EU) 2019/631 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the monitoring of CO2 emissions from new light commercial vehicles type-approved in a multi-stage process (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/22 of 31 October 2019 amending Annexes I and III to Regulation (EU) 2019/631 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the monitoring of CO2 emissions from new light commercial vehicles type-approved in a multi-stage process (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex XX to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex XX to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following is added in point 21az (Regulation (EU) 2019/631 of the European Parliament and of the Council) of Annex XX to the EEA Agreement:

‘, as amended by:

| — | 32020 R 0022: Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/22 of 31 October 2019 (OJ L 8, 14.1.2020, p. 2).’ |
| --- | --- |

—

32020 R 0022: Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/22 of 31 October 2019 (OJ L 8, 14.1.2020, p. 2).’

Article 2

The text of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/22 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 12 December 2020, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1), or on the day of the entry into force of Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 168/2020 of 23 October 2020 (2), whichever is the later.

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 11 December 2020.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Sabine MONAUNI

---

(1)  
  OJ L 8, 14.1.2020, p. 2.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

(2)  
  OJ L 227, 14.9.2023, p. 34.

2

---
COURTROOM DEPUTY’S MINUTES DATE: October 25, 2006

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA DIGITAL RECORDING: 10:45 - 10:51 

/ARRAIGNMENT CHANGE OF PLEA  CONSENT PLEA

 RULE 44(c) HEARING  SENTENCING

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

PRESIDING MAG. JUDGE: Susan Russ Walker DEPUTY CLERK: Joyce Taylor

CASE NUMBER: 1:06cr170-WHA-DRB DEFENDANT NAME: Roy Dale Wallace

AUSA: Clark Morris DEFENDANT ATTORNEY: Paul Cooper standing in for Jim Cooper

Type counsel ( )Waived; ( )Retained; ( / )CJA; ( )FPD

( ) appointed at arraignment; ( ) standing in for: _______________

PTSO/USPO:

Interpreter present? ( / )NO; ( )YES Name:

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 This is defendant’s FIRST APPEARANCE.

 Financial Affidavit executed. ORAL MOTION for appointment of Counsel.

 ORAL ORDER appointing Federal Public Defender. Notice of Appearance to be filed.

 WAIVER OF INDICTMENT executed and filed.

 INFORMATION filed.

 Juvenile Information filed w/Certificate that State Court refused jurisdiction.

PLEA: /Not Guilty (Second Superseding Indictment)

 Guilty as to:

 Count(s):

 Count(s):  dismissed on oral motion of USA

 to be dismissed at sentencing

 Written plea agreement filed  ORDERED SEALED

 ORAL ORDER Accepting Guilty Plea and Adjudicating Defendant Guilty as to Counts

/CRIMINAL TERM: 1/8/07 / WAIVER OF SPEEDY TRIAL filed. 

 DISCOVERY DISCLOSURE DATE: 10/25/06

 ORDER: Defendant continued under  same bond;  summons; for:

 Trial on ____________;  Sentencing on ____________

/ Defendant remanded to custody of U. S. Marshal for:

 Trial on ________________; or  Sentencing on ______________

 Rule 44 Hearing:  Waiver of Conflict of Interest Form executed

 Defendant requests time to secure new counsel

Case 1:06-cr-00170-WHA-CSC Document 222 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 1 of 1
Order entered October 15, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-00771-CV

ANDREA M. REYES, Appellant

V.

GUADALUPE TORRES AND ROSALINDA SILVA, Appellees

On Appeal from the 193rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-17-13110

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s October 12, 2019 motion for extension of time to file her 

opening brief. The reporter’s record was ordered to be filed October 21, 2019, but appellant 

explains she was recently informed no reporter’s record exists for the underlying proceedings. 

We rule as follows.

We VACATE our September 30, 2019 order directing court reporter Vielica Dobbins to 

file the reporter’s record no later than October 21, 2019 and ORDER appellant’s opening brief 

be filed no later than November 15, 2019.

We DIRECT the Clerk of the Court send a copy of this order to Ms. Dobbins and the 

parties. 

/s/ BILL WHITEHILL

JUSTICE
#### § 780.21 Notice.

The Board will serve upon the patent owner and all other parties a written notice of the Department's proposed action to declare the patent affected with the public interest, and the notice shall identify the patent and state the basis for the proposed declaration.
Editorial Note on Part 725
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 725 appear at 88 FR 41292, June 26, 2023.

§ 725.25 Term and renewal. ( a ) Each access permit will be issued for a two year term, unless otherwise stated in the permit.
( b ) Applications for renewal shall be filed in accordance with § 725.11. Each renewal application must be complete, without reference to previous applications. In any case in which a permittee has filed a properly completed application for renewal more than thirty (30) days prior to the expiration of his existing permit, such existing permit shall not expire until the application for a renewal has been finally acted upon by the Director, Office of Environment, Health, Safety and Security.
[41 FR 56778, Dec. 30, 1976, as amended at 71 FR 68732, Nov. 28, 2006; 88 FR 41292, June 26, 2023]
From: 

Sen.t;' 

To: .". 

,,', 

.,-/ ,-" 

Jaimie Trautman Uaimietrautman@gmail.com] 

Saturday, February 13,20109:07 AM 

Del/shy, Dennis (OST) 

Subject: EAS' Selection Clinton Co; NY 

Devany, Dennis (OST) 

"' ... " 

Th~ Qli~tgn e(~;Legislature took a stand that is not supported by the residents of this county. Against all 

common sense and business sense from the point of view of county residents they voted to recommend Colgan 

Air to replace Cape Air.,,:Ticket rates will increase, the number of flights will decrease, and we will be giving up 

a company that has a proven track record for safety, timeliness, responsiveness and integrity. A major argument 

was that bigger planes are needed. It is a fallacious argument. Many planes currently fly with empty seats. Cape 

Air has said itwill provide more planes and more flights if there is additional demand. More planes and more 

flights are a hetter response to demand than fewer flights and bigger planes. 

The survey carried out by the North Country Chamber of Commerce and accepted as a basis for their decision 

by the County Legislature was slanted toward the Chamber's desired conclusion. In its argument to the 

Legislature, the Chamber pushed Quebec residents' opinion. What about Clinton County residents' opinion? We 

want Cape Air. They have served us well and we are confident that they will continue to do so. 

Please use your vote to correct a huge mistake that our Legislature has made by its vote for Colgan Air to 

replace Cape Air. 

Thank you for your attention, 

laimie Trautman 

Resident, Clinton County NY 

. 1
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

MARK G. KEEGAN,

Appellant,

v.

TRACEY NEFF,

Appellee.

No. 4D2023-2621

[May 29, 2024]

Appeal of a nonfinal order from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth 

Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; G. Joseph Curley Jr., Judge; L.T. 

Case No. 502022CA002420.

Mark G. Keegan of Keegan Law Group, Palm Beach, pro se.

Brett L. Goldblatt of Goldblatt Law, PLLC, Boca Raton, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the circuit court’s post-judgment order denying appellant’s 

objection and motion to vacate a judicial sale of property in the underlying 

partition action.

Most of appellant’s arguments are untimely directed at the original final 

judgment ordering partition and sale, which appellant characterizes as a 

non-final order. However, the judgment constituted a final order. See 

Perez v. Jaimot, 326 So. 3d 748, 749 (Fla. 3d DCA 2021) (“[A]n order of 

partition is final at such time as the court directs the sale of the property.”). 

The order was final even though the court retained jurisdiction to divide 

the proceeds. See Morrison v. Smolarick, 334 So. 3d 675, 676 (Fla. 2d DCA 

2022) (“A partition order directing the sale of property is final even when 

the court retains jurisdiction for the purpose of adjusting, by a further 

decree, the accounts between the parties.”) (citation and internal quotation 

marks omitted). Therefore, appellant cannot challenge the final judgment 

ordering partition.

Appellant’s remaining arguments also lack merit without further 

discussion.
2

Affirmed.

WARNER, GERBER and FORST, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### In the Matter of the City of Rochester, Appellant, Relative To Acquiring Title to Property for an Urban Renewal Project in the Front Street Area Known as Genesee Crossroads. Paul Wolk et al., Respondents.

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: Since the findings of the trial court are insufficient in that they fail to state the method used in arriving at a valuation, we have re-evaluated the evidence and made additional findings in order to avoid a remand of the case. *(Matter of City of Rochester [State St. Holding Corp.],*32 A D 2d 731.) Upon the trial the appraiser called by the owners testified that the improvement, which was more than 100 years old, added no value to the property. We have accepted this concession and, in view of the agreement by both experts that the market data approach is the best method for determining value in this case, have employed that method in finding a value for the land. Sales presented by the owners’ appraiser, adjusted to take into account differences from the subject property, indicate a basic square foot value of $40.50, to which we have added an allowance for corner influence of 30%, the allowance used by the city’s, appraiser. The value of $52.65 per square foot thus arrived at, multiplied by the area taken of 2,222 square feet, yields a total value of $116,988 (say $117,000), the value fixed by the trial court. (Appeal from judgment of Monroe Trial Term, in condemnation proceeding.) Present—Goldman, P. J., Del Vecchio, Marsh, Gabrielli and Moule, JJ.