alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-81,450-02

EX PARTE BILLY FAIRCLOTH, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. D-1-DC-11-200824-A IN THE 167TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM TRAVIS COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Applicant filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and

the district clerk forwarded it to this Court. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07. Under Article

11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, a district clerk is required to forward to this Court,

among other things, “the application, any answers filed, any motions filed, transcripts of all

depositions and hearings, any affidavits, and any other matters such as official records used by the

court in resolving issues of fact.” Id. at § 3(d); see also TEX. R. APP. P. 73.4(b)(4). The record

forwarded to this Court appears, however, to be incomplete. Copies of the following documents,

which the Docket Record in volume six indicates were filed in the trial court, are not in the

forwarded record: (1) Joint Stipulation of Evidence; (2) Joint Motion to Designate Issues of Fact and
2

Proposed Order Designating Issues; (3) Amended Joint Motion to Designate Issues of Fact and

Proposed Order Designating Issues; (4) the trial court’s Order Designating Issues; and (5) Agreed

Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law.

The district clerk shall either forward to this Court or certify in writing that these documents

are not part of the record. The district clerk shall comply with this order within thirty days from the

date of this order.

Filed: November 28, 2022

Do not publish
#### § 1536.400 What method do I use as an agency awarding official to obtain a recipient's agreement to comply with the OMB guidance?

To obtain a recipient's agreement to comply with applicable requirements in the OMB guidance at 2 CFR part 182, you must include the following term or condition in the award:

Drug-free workplace. You as the recipient must comply with drug-free workplace requirements in Subpart B (or Subpart C, if the recipient is an individual) of 2 CFR Subtitle B, Chapter XV, Part 1536, which adopts the Governmentwide implementation (2 CFR part 182) of sec. 5152-5158 of the Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1988 (Pub. L. 100-690, Title V, Subtitle D; 41 U.S.C. 701-707).
#### § 905.23 What are the opportunities for using the Freedom of Information Act to request plan and report data?

IRPs, small customer plans, minimum investment reports and EE/RE reports and associated data submitted to Western are subject to the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) and may be made available to the public upon request. IRPs must be posted on a customer's publicly available Web site or on Western's Web site. Customers posting their IRPs on their own Web site must notify Western of this decision when they submit their IRP. A hotlink on Western's Web site to IRPs posted on customer Web sites gives interested parties ready access to those IRPs. Western will post on its Web site the IRPs of customers that do not post on their own Web sites. Prior to posting, Western will provide the customer the opportunity to submit its views on whether information contained in the IRP is exempt from the FOIA's mandatory public disclosure requirements. Customers may request confidential treatment of all or part of a submitted document consistent with FOIA exemptions. Western will determine whether particular information is exempt from public access. Western will not disclose to the public information it has determined to be exempt, recognizing that certain competition-related customer information may be proprietary.

[73 FR 35062, June 20, 2008]
###### Editorial Note on Part 180

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 180 appear at 79 FR 75879, Dec. 19, 2014.

#### § 180.620 Do Federal agencies coordinate suspension and debarment actions?

Yes, when more than one Federal agency has an interest in a suspension or debarment, the agencies may consider designating one agency as the lead agency for making the decision. Agencies are encouraged to establish methods and procedures for coordinating their suspension and debarment actions.
#### In re SCHWARTZ & COHN, Inc.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

May 29, 1914.)

In the matter of the application of Schwartz & Cohn, Incorporated, for leave to withdraw moneys, etc.

No opinion. Order of the County Court of Kings County affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.
#### Ross DiLorenzo, Appellant, v General Motors Acceptance Corp., Respondent.

[814 NYS2d 750]

*854In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for conversion, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Byrne, J.H.O.), entered July 18, 2005, as, after a nonjury trial upon stipulated facts, and upon a decision of the same court dated April 7, 2005, is in favor of the defendant and against him dismissing the first, third, and fifth causes of action.

Ordered that the notice of appeal from the decision is deemed a premature notice of appeal from the judgment *(see*CPLR 5520 [c]); and it is further,

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly awarded judgment to the defendant dismissing the causes of action to recover damages for trespass to chattel, conversion, and negligence. A person who, like the plaintiff, innocently purchases stolen property from a thief, nonetheless acquires no title to that property *(see Candela v Port Motors,*208 AD2d 486, 486-487 [1994]; *Green v Arcadia Fin.,*174 Misc 2d 411, 413 [1997], *affd*261 AD2d 896 [1999]; *cf. Johnny Dell, Inc. v New York State Police,*84 Misc 2d 360 [1975]). Moreover, where, as here, a demand for the return of the stolen property is made on behalf of the rightful owner, the plaintiff, as an innocent purchaser, loses any possessory interest he might have claimed in the property *(see Pivar v Graduate School of Figurative Art of N.Y. Academy of Art,*290 AD2d 212, 213 [2002]). Thus, the defendant’s seizure of the subject property, even under the mistaken belief that it had a security interest therein, did not impose liability upon it to the plaintiff for the value of the property. Mastro, J.P., Rivera, Skelos and Covello, JJ., concur.
#### Jones *v.*Woodstock Iron Co.

*Appeal from Decree on Demurrers to Gross-Bill.*

1. *When appeal lies.*— An appeal does not lie (Code, §§ 3611-2) from a decree sustaining demurrers to a cross-bill, but making no final disposition of it.

Appeal from the City Court of Anniston, in equity.

Heard before the Hon. B. F. Oassady.

Parsons & Darby, Gordon Macdonald, and Kelly & Smith, for appellant.

Knox *&*Bowie, and Caldwell & Joiinstcn, *contra.*

STONE, C. J.

The defendants in the original bill, Alice O. Jones *et aln*filed a demurrer thereto, assigning grounds of demurrer. They also answered the bill, and made their answer a cross-bill. To the cross-bill there was a demurrer, assigning-many grounds. The cause being submitted to the court on the several demurrers to the original and cross-bills, decretal orders were separately rendered, overruling the demurrer to the original bill, and sustaining eighteen of the nineteen grounds of demurrer filed to the cross-bill of Alice C. Jones *et al.*Jos. A. Jones, one of the defendants to the original bill, had filed a separate cross-bill, to which a demurrer was sustained, and his cross-bill was dismissed. No final decree has been rendered on any phase of the case, save the dismissal of the cross-bill of Jos. A. Jones.

An appeal was taken to this court by some of the complainants in the Alice C. Jones cross-bill, which is evidenced only by the appeal bond, or security for costs, and by the certificate of appeal. The latter does not show from what the appeal was taken. The former, or security for costs, describes it as “an appeal this day taken to the Supreme Court of Alabama, by Alice C. Jones and the other complainants in the cross-bill filed by them in the cause above stated. The appeal is taken from the City Court of Anniston, sustaining demurrers to said cross-bill.”

We hold that this appeal brings up only the rulings on the cross-bill; first, because the security for costs savs so in terms; *546and, second, any ruling of *this*court, and *the*result of it, which should go beyond the questions raised by the demurrer to the cross-bill, would be outside of the stipulations of the bond, and the sureties could not be charged for any costs that might be adjudged on such outside question or questions. — 2 Brick. Dig. 374, § 18; *City Council v. Hughes, 65*Ala. 201.

The appeal being only from the rulings on the cross-bill, it can not be *entertained.*—Barclay *v.*Spragins, 80 Ala. 357.

Appeal dismissed.
###### Editorial Note on Part 9

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 9 appear at 82 FR 52825, Nov. 15, 2017.

#### § 9.85 Fees.

Fees shall not be charged for search or review of records requested under this subpart or for making copies or extracts of records to make them available for review, although fees may be charged for additional copies. Fees established under 31 U.S.C. 483c and 5 U.S.C. 552a(f)(5) shall be charged according to the schedule contained in § 9.35 for actual copies of records disclosed under the Freedom of Information Act from Privacy Act Systems of Records.

[70 FR 34309, June 14, 2005]
1 Faulk, Scott (OST)

From: Faulk, Scott (OST)

Sent: Friday, August 01, 2014 9:51 AM

To: 'nissa.pilcher@alaska.gov'; 'john.binder@alaska.gov'; 'Linda.bustamante@alaska.gov'; 'rich.sewell@alaska.gov'

Cc: 'Janette Stansel'; Bob Bursiel; Ken Leary <KLeary@evertsair.com> (KLeary@evertsair.com); 'Adventure'; Accounting; Schlemmer, Kevin (OST) Subject: EAS at Lake Minchumina and Rampart

Attachments: Everts at Lake Minchumina.pdf; Everts at Rampart.pdf; Wright Air at Lake Minchumina.pdf; Warbelow's Ra mpart EAS Proposal --- 2014.pdf

Greetings All,

I would like to update you on the Esse ntial Air Service (EAS) situation at Lake Minchumina and Rampart, and give you an opportunity to offer a ny comments on the record before we submit a recommendation to the Assistant Secretary for Aviation and International Affairs.

As you know, by Order 2014-6-8, issued on June 17, 2014, the Department solicited pr oposals from air carriers interested in providing EAS at Lake Minchumina and Ra mpart for a new term. In response to our request, Wright Air Service and Everts Air submitted proposals to serve Lake Minchumina; Warbelow’s Air Ventures and Everts Air submitted proposals to serve Rampart. I have attached each air carrier’s proposal for your review and I expect them to be uploaded on www.regulations.gov sometime today. I request that you review the proposals and submit any comments you may have as soon as possible, but no later than September 1, 2014. Please send your comments directly to scott.faulk@dot.gov . Also, please forward this to all relevant parties that I have not included on th e distribution list. Feel free to contact me if you have any questions.

Scott Faulk Transportation Industry Analyst U.S. Department of Transportation Office of Aviation Analysis EAS & Domestic Analysis Division 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE Washington, DC 20590
202-366-9967
§ 1130.310 Disposition of real property. ( a ) *OMB guidance.* OMB guidance in 2 CFR 200.311(c): ( 1 ) Addresses the recipient's responsibility to request disposition instructions for real property when the recipient no longer needs it for the originally authorized purpose; and
( 2 ) Identifies three alternative disposition methods those instructions may specify.
( b ) *DoD implementation.* DoD implements the guidance in 2 CFR 200.311(c) through award terms and conditions that govern disposition of real property acquired or improved under awards.
( c ) *Award terms and conditions.* A DoD Component's general terms and conditions must include the wording appendix C to this part provides for Section B of PROP Article III to specify requirements concerning disposition of real property acquired or improved under awards.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 371 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 371

   Recognizing the commencement of Ramadan, the Muslim holy month of 
  fasting and spiritual renewal, and commending Muslims in the United 
            States and throughout the world for their faith.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 26, 2017

  Ms. Eddie Bernice Johnson of Texas (for herself, Mr. Pascrell, Mr. 
    Carson of Indiana, Ms. McCollum, and Mr. Ellison) submitted the 
 following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign 
                                Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Recognizing the commencement of Ramadan, the Muslim holy month of 
  fasting and spiritual renewal, and commending Muslims in the United 
            States and throughout the world for their faith.

Whereas since the terrorist attacks on the United States on September 11, 2001, 
        threats and incidents of violence have been directed at law-abiding, 
        patriotic Americans of African, Arab, and South Asian descent, 
        particularly members of the Islamic faith;
Whereas, on September 14, 2001, the House of Representatives passed a concurrent 
        resolution condemning bigotry and violence against Arab-Americans, 
        American Muslims, and Americans from South Asia in the wake of the 
        terrorist attacks;
Whereas it is estimated that there are approximately 1,600,000,000 Muslims 
        worldwide;
Whereas over 3,700 Muslims serve on active duty and over 1,900 Muslims serve as 
        selected reserve personnel in the United States Armed Forces;
Whereas Ramadan is the holy month of fasting and spiritual renewal for Muslims 
        worldwide, and is the 9th month of the Muslim calendar year; and
Whereas the observance of the Muslim holy month of Ramadan commences at dusk on 
        May 26, 2017, and continues for one lunar month: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That--
            (1) during this time of conflict, in order to demonstrate 
        solidarity with and support for members of the community of 
        Islam in the United States and throughout the world, the House 
        of Representatives recognizes the Islamic faith as one of the 
        great religions of the world; and
            (2) in observance of and out of respect for the 
        commencement of Ramadan, the Muslim holy month of fasting and 
        spiritual renewal, the House of Representatives acknowledges 
        the onset of Ramadan and expresses its deepest respect to 
        Muslims in the United States and throughout the world on this 
        significant occasion.
                                 <all>
```
| (logo) WELLS

      FARGO | CMBS Department

MAC N9401-011

1055 10th Avenue S.E.

Minneapolis, MN 55414

  |
|----------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

 

                Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc. 

                1585 Broadway

                New York, New York 10036

                

 

                RE: Annual Statement of Compliance for Morgan Stanley Bank of America Merrill Lynch Trust 2013-C8, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through

            Certificates Series 2013-C8

 

 

Per the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of February 1, 2013 (the “Agreement”), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Custodian (“Wells Fargo”), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2014 (the “Reporting Period”): 

 

 

(a)    A review of Wells Fargo’s activities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under such officer’s supervision; and 

 

(b)   To the best of such officer’s knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

February 18, 2015

 

 

/s/ Gail Vannest

GAIL VANNEST

Vice President 

 

 

 

                Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
IV 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 56 

Commending the Palestinian people for conducting a free and fair presidential 

election on January 9, 2005, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 1, 2005 

Mr. BLUNT (for himself, Mr. HOYER, Mr. PENCE, and Mr. GENE GREEN of 

Texas) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on International Relations 

RESOLUTION 

Commending the Palestinian people for conducting a free 

and fair presidential election on January 9, 2005, and 

for other purposes. 

Whereas on January 9, 2005, the Palestinian people elected 

Mahmoud Abbas as the second President of the Palestinian Authority; 

Whereas this election has been hailed as free and fair and is 

an important and noteworthy step in advancing democracy in the Arab world; 

Whereas Israel should be commended for facilitating the Palestinian election proceedings; 

Whereas the United States is hopeful that a peaceful resolution of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict can be achieved; 
2 

•HRES 56 IH 

Whereas the United States is strongly committed to the security of Israel and its well-being as a Jewish state; and 

Whereas on June 24, 2002, President George W. Bush expressed his vision of two states living side by side in 

peace and security and that vision can only be fully realized when terrorism is defeated, so that a new state may 

be created based on the rule of law and respect for 

human rights: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) commends the Palestinian people for con3 ducting a free and fair presidential election on Janu4 ary 9, 2005; 

5 (2) congratulates the new Palestinian Presi6 dent, Mahmoud Abbas; 

7 (3) urges the new Palestinian leadership to con8 tinue to advance democratic ideals by reforming the 

9 Palestinian political structure, advancing human 

10 rights, and ending corruption; 

11 (4) strongly condemns terrorism and urges 

12 President Mahmoud Abbas, who has previously dis13 avowed terrorism, to immediately take steps to dis14 mantle the Palestinian terrorist infrastructure, con15 fiscate unauthorized weapons, arrest and bring ter16 rorists to justice, consolidate and control the many 

17 Palestinian security organizations, and end the in18 citement to violence and hatred in the Palestinian 
3 

•HRES 56 IH 

1 media, educational institutions, mosques, and other 

2 institutions; 

3 (5) urges Arab states to take active steps to en4 courage and assist the Palestinian Authority in 

5 bringing an end to terrorism and an end to anti6 Israel incitement in their own media; and 

7 (6) encourages all interested parties to take ad8 vantage of this historic opportunity to remove obsta9 cles to achieving a lasting peace in the Middle East. 

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         137,913
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             510
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    553,220
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         441,833
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           445,389
<LOANS>                                      1,731,617
<ALLOWANCE>                                     40,211
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,335,045
<DEPOSITS>                                   1,873,942
<SHORT-TERM>                                   343,357
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            468,899
<LONG-TERM>                                    330,917
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        25,997
<OTHER-SE>                                     291,933
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               3,335,045
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                171,328
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               65,091
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 5,969
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               242,388
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              99,091
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             139,194
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          103,194
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   13,571
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             (1,620)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                203,646
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 67,241
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      31,797
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    31,797
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.23
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.21
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                     3.7
<LOANS-NON>                                     20,939
<LOANS-PAST>                                    15,889
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                 1,559
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                39,260
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   21,258
<RECOVERIES>                                     7,168
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               40,211
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
#### § 600.140 Purpose of procurement standards.

Sections 600.141 through 600.148 set forth standards for use by recipients in establishing procedures for the procurement of supplies and other expendable property, equipment, real property and other services with Federal funds. These standards are furnished to ensure that such materials and services are obtained in an effective manner and in compliance with the provisions of applicable Federal statutes and executive orders. No additional procurement standards or requirements shall be imposed by DOE upon recipients, unless specifically required by Federal statute or executive order or in accordance with the deviation procedures of § 600.4.