38500 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 127 / Friday, July 2, 2010 / Notices 

questions on risk factors for poor 

civilian readjustment, and other 

biographical and psychological content. 

DoD regulations stipulate that all 

military personnel must receive preseparation counseling no less than 90 

days before leaving active duty. 

NHRC proposes tracking over time the 

mental well-being of eligible baseline 

respondents for the longitudinal portion 

of the study through a follow-on survey 

3 to 6 months after separation from 

military service, after they have 

completed the transition from military 

to civilian life. Data from extant 

historical personnel and medical files 

will also be combined with survey data 

to develop models that demonstrate the 

influence of combat, and a variety of 

covariates, on mental health symptoms, 

resilience, and substance abuse. We 

estimate that approximately 1,850 of the 

2,700 baseline participants will be 

eligible for and consent to participate in 

the follow-up survey. In order to 

facilitate locating these respondents, the 

baseline questionnaire requested 

participants provide name, relocation 

plans, names and contact information 

for two friends or relatives who always 

know where the respondent is living, 

and the respondent’s date of birth and 

social security number. The follow-up 

survey will be sent to respondents 

through the mail. Respondents will also 

have the option of completing this 

survey via the Web, which will closely 

simulate the hardcopy version of the 

instrument. 

Affected Public: Marine Corps 

personnel who have separated from the 

Military in the six-month period 

following the baseline survey. 

Annual Burden Hours: 1,850. 

Number of Respondents: 1,850. 

Responses per Respondent: 1. 

Average Burden per Response: 1 hour. 

Frequency: One time. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Summary of Information Collection 

This study population is unique 

because there is a need for longitudinal 

mental health research in the Military 

that spans both Active Duty and the 

period of reintegration into civilian life 

after combat exposure. Given that 

disability and poor physical health were 

significant predictors of mental health 

problems in the pilot study, that stigma 

continues to be an issue for military 

personnel seeking mental health care, 

and that significant difficulties remain 

in transitioning mental health care, this 

type of program would appear 

especially appropriate and suited for 

implementation in the U.S. military. 

The follow-up survey will consist of 

a mailed paper-and-pencil questionnaire 

with the option of completing the 

questionnaire via the Web. All 

participants from the baseline survey 

who have separated from military 

service since completion of the baseline 

survey will be eligible for the second 

phase of study and their participation in 

the follow-up survey will be requested. 

Respondents were informed during the 

Introductory Briefing to the baseline 

survey that they may be contacted for a 

follow-up interview. 

Approximately 15 percent of Military 

personnel are women. Therefore, it is 

estimated that 15 percent will be the 

proportion of women completing the 

survey; the remaining 85 percent will be 

male respondents. 

Dated: June 28, 2010. 

Mitchell S. Bryman, 

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison 

Officer, Department of Defense. 

[FR Doc. 2010–16089 Filed 7–1–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 5001–06–P 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

Department of the Army 

Corps of Engineers 

Notice of Availability of Draft 

Environmental Impact Statement for 

the Proposed Folsom South of U.S. 

Highway 50 Specific Plan Project, in 

Sacramento County, CA, Corps Permit 

Application Number SPK–2007–02159 

AGENCY: Department of the Army, U.S. 

Army Corps of Engineers, DOD. 

ACTION: Notice of availability. 

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the National 

Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the 

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), 

Sacramento District has prepared a Draft 

Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) 

that analyzes the potential effects of 

implementing each of six on-site landuse and eleven off-site water supply/ 

alignment alternative scenarios for a 

large-scale, mixed-use, mixed-density 

master planned community on the 

approximately 3,502-acre Folsom South 

of U.S. Highway 50 Specific Plan area 

(SPA), located within the Sphere of 

Influence of the City of Folsom, 

Sacramento County, California. The 

DEIS has been prepared as a joint 

document with the City of Folsom 

(City). The City is the local agency 

responsible for preparing an 

Environmental Impact Report in 

compliance with the California 

Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). 

The DEIS documents the existing 

condition of environmental resources in 

and around areas considered for 

development, and potential impacts on 

those resources as a result of 

implementing the alternatives. The onsite land use alternatives considered in 

detail are: (1) No Project Alternative (No 

development for both land use and 

water supply/alignment); (2) No USACE 

Permit Alternative (no discharge of 

dredged and/or fill material into waters 

of the U.S.); (3) Proposed Project 

Alternative, the Applicants’ Preferred 

Alternative; (4) Resource Impact 

Minimization Alternative; (5) 

Centralized Development Alternative; 

and (6) Reduced Hillside Development 

Alternative. The off-site water supply/ 

alignment alternatives considered in 

detail are: (1) No USACE Permit 

Alternative (no discharge of dredged 

and/or fill material into waters of the 

U.S.); (2) Proposed Off-site Water 

Facility Alternative—Raw Water 

Conveyance—Grant Line Road 

Alignment and On-site WTP; (3) Off-site 

Water Facility Alternative 1—Raw 

Water Conveyance—Grant Line Road 

Alignment and White Rock WTP; (4) 

Off-site Water Facility Alternative 1A— 

Raw Water Conveyance—Grant Line 

Road Route Variation Alignment and 

White Rock WTP; (5) Off-site Water 

Facility Alternative 2—Treated Water 

Conveyance—Douglas Road Alignment 

and Vineyard SWTP; (6) Off-site Water 

Facility Alternative 2A—Treated Water 

Conveyance—Douglas Road Route 

Variation Alignment and Vineyard 

SWTP; (7) Off-site Water Facility 

Alternative 2B—Treated Water 

Conveyance—North Douglas Tanks 

Variation Alignment and Vineyard 

SWTP; (8) Off-site Water Facility 

Alternative 3—Raw Water 

Conveyance—Douglas Road Alignment 

and White Rock WTP; (9) Off-site Water 

Facility Alternative 3A—Raw Water 

Conveyance—Douglas Road Route 

Variation Alignment and White Rock 

WTP; (10) Off-site Water Facility 

Alternative 4—Raw Water Conveyance 

to Folsom Boulevard Alignment and 

Folsom Boulevard WTP; and (11) Offsite Water Facility Alternative 4A—Raw 

Water Conveyance to Folsom 

Boulevard—Route Variation Alignment 

and Folsom Boulevard WTP. 

DATES: All written comments must be 

postmarked on or before September 7, 

2010. The USACE and the City will 

jointly conduct a public meeting that 

will be held on August 2, 2010 from 5 

p.m. to 7 p.m. The public meeting will 

be held at the Folsom Community 

Center, 52 Natoma Street, Folsom, 

California 95630. 

ADDRESSES: Comments may be 

submitted in writing to: Lisa M. Gibson, 

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 127 / Friday, July 2, 2010 / Notices 38501 

Sacramento District, Regulatory 

Division; 1325 J Street, Room 1480, 

Sacramento, California 95814–2922, or 

via e-mail to 

Lisa.M.Gibson2@usace.army.mil. Oral 

and written comments may also be 

submitted at the public meeting 

described in the DATES section. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lisa 

M. Gibson, (916) 557–5288, or via e-mail 

at Lisa.M.Gibson2@usace.army.mil. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The South 

Folsom Property Owners Group, the 

project applicants, are seeking adoption 

by the City of the proposed SPA project 

and associated entitlements. The City 

and the South Folsom Property Owners 

Group are also seeking authorization 

from USACE for the placement of 

dredged or fill material into waters of 

the United States pursuant to Section 

404 of the Clean Water Act. The 

Proposed Project includes 10,210 

residential units at various densities on 

a total of 1,477.2 acres; 362.8 acres 

designated for commercial and 

industrial use, including a regional 

shopping center; public/quasi-public 

uses; elementary, middle, and high 

schools on 179.3 acres; 121.7 acres of 

community and neighborhood parks; 

stormwater detention basins; 1,053.1 

acres of open-space areas and openspace preserves; and major roads with 

landscaping. In addition, the proposed 

project includes the construction of 

several off-site infrastructure facilities, 

including intersection expansions to 

allow access to and from U.S. 50 and the 

SPA, an overpass of U.S. 50, two 

roadway connections and sewer 

pipelines from the SPA into El Dorado 

Hills, a sewer force main connection to 

the existing City system, a detention 

basin and water pipelines and facilities. 

The SPA contains approximately 84.94 

acres of waters of the U.S. The proposed 

land-use plan would involve the 

discharge of fill material into 

approximately 39.50 acres of waters of 

the U.S., and indirect impacts to 0.29 

acres of waters of the U.S. resulting from 

fragmentation of existing waters. In 

addition, the proposed land-use plan 

involves the preservation of 

approximately 44.19 acres of waters of 

the U.S., concentrated primarily on the 

Alder Creek corridor and adjacent 

tributaries and wetlands. 

For the proposed off-site water 

supply/alignment for the SPA, the City 

is proposing off-site water facilities that 

would involve the permanent 

assignment to the City of the contractual 

entitlements to Central Valley Project 

(CVP) contract entitlement water, 

totaling not more than 8,000 acre-feet 

per year (AFY) from the Natomas 

Central Mutual Water Company 

(NCMWC), diverting the water supply 

from the Sacramento River and 

conveying the water to the SPA. The 

proposed water supply would also 

involve the City purchasing dedicated 

capacity within the Freeport Regional 

Water Project (Freeport Project) from 

Sacramento County Water Agency 

(SCWA), which would serve as the 

point of diversion (POD) on the 

Sacramento River and partial 

conveyance pathway for not more than 

6,000 AFY purchased from NCMWC. 

The City proposes to add the Freeport 

POD to the assigned CVP water to 

facilitate the diversion of these supplies 

at the existing Freeport Project 

diversion. The City proposes to pump 

and convey the assigned NCMWC CVP 

water supply through the Freeport 

Project diversion facility and 

conveyance pipeline to the point where 

SCWA and East Bay Municipal Utility 

District pipelines split. The City would 

then construct new water supply 

conveyance infrastructure from the 

bifurcation point to the SPA within an 

approximately 200-foot corridor. The 

corridor for the proposed construction 

of the water line and the proposed 

location for water treatment plants 

contains approximately 50.7 acres of 

waters of the U.S. The estimate of 

waters of the U.S. within the proposed 

water supply corridor was determined 

based on aerial photographs and 

National Wetland Inventory maps, and 

has not been field delineated or verified 

by USACE. Because the City has not yet 

completed project specific engineering 

details for the proposed off-site water 

supply/alignment, the exact impacts to 

waters of the U.S. cannot be determined. 

However, construction of the water 

supply infrastructure is expected to 

occur within an area of less than 100- 

feet in width, and, depending on which 

side of the corridor construction would 

occur, would impact an estimated 5.7 

acres or 6.8 acres of waters of the U.S. 

USACE invites full public 

participation to promote open 

communication and better decisionmaking. All persons and organizations 

that have an interest in the SPA are 

urged to participate in the NEPA 

process. 

An electronic version of the DEIS may 

be viewed at the USACE, Sacramento 

District Web site: http://www.spk.usace.

army.mil/organizations/cespk-co/ 

regulatory/EISs/EIS-index.html: In 

addition, a hardcopy of the DEIS may 

also be reviewed at the following 

locations: 

(1) City of Folsom City Hall, 

Community Development Department, 

50 Natoma Street, Folsom, California 

95630. 

(2) Folsom Public Library, Georgia 

Murray Building, 411 Stafford Street, 

Folsom, California 95630. 

June 23, 2010. 

Thomas C. Chapman, 

Colonel, U.S. Army, District Engineer. 

[FR Doc. 2010–16135 Filed 7–1–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3720–58–P 

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 

Department of the Army 

Corps of Engineers 

The Release of the Final Environmental 

Impact Statement (FEIS) for the Town 

of Nags Head Proposed Beach 

Nourishment Project in Dare County, 

NC 

AGENCY: Department of the Army, U.S. 

Army Corps of Engineers, DoD. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Army Corps of 

Engineers (COE), Wilmington District, 

Regulatory Division, has been reviewing 

a request for Department of the Army 

authorization, pursuant to Section 404 

of the Clean Water Act and Section 10 

of the Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899, 

from the Town of Nags Head to dredge 

up to 4.6 million cubic yards of beachquality sediment from an offshore 

borrow source, and deposit the material 

along approximately 10 miles of ocean 

shoreline in the Town of Nags Head. 

The applicant proposes to utilize a 

self-contained hopper dredge during a 

proposed construction window from 

April through September to undertake 

the dredging operations and discharge 

the sand on the beach via submerged 

pipeline. The applicant’s proposed 

borrow areas include sites identified as 

having beach quality material in the 

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 

Wilmington District’s EIS, entitled Final 

Feasibility Report and Environmental 

Impact Statement on Hurricane 

Protection and Beach Erosion Control, 

dated September 2000 (USACE 2000). 

DATES: Written comments on the Final 

EIS will be received until July 26, 2010. 

ADDRESSES: Copies of comments and 

questions regarding the Final EIS may 

be addressed to: U.S. Army Corps of 

Engineers, Wilmington District, 

Washington Regulatory Field Office. 

ATTN: File Number 200640282, 2407 

W. Fifth Street, Washington, NC 27889. 

Copies of the Draft EIS can be reviewed 

on the Wilmington District Regulatory 

homepage at, http:// 

www.saw.usace.army.mil/wetlands/ 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES