alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### NUM BER 13-0 8-00 531- CV 

## COURT OF A PP EA LS T H I R T E E N T H D I S T R I C T O F T E X AS CORPUS CHRI ST I -E DI NBURG

____ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _______ _ JOSE R. CA RR ERAS, M . D ., A pp ellan t,
v . JO SE V IL LA R R EA LA N D S ON IA V IL LA R R EA L , A p p el le es .

____ ____ ____ ____ __ _ _ _ _ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ___ On ap pe al f rom th e 2 06t h Dist rict C ou rt of H ida lgoC ou nty , T exas .

____ ____ ____ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ___ 

## ME MOR A N D U M OP I N I ON Be fo re Ju stice s Yañ ez, Garza, a nd Ve la M emo rand um Opin ion Pe r Cu riam App ellantperfecte d an app eal f rom a judgmen t ent ered bythe 20 6th Distri ct Court of Hi dal g o C ounty , Texas, i n c ause number C -2 374- 07- D. Ap pel lant h a s f iled an unoppos ed moti on to di smi ssthe appeal

. Appel lan t req uests that thi s C our t di smi ssthe app eal.2

Th e C o u rt , hav ing co nsi dered th e doc uments on fil e and appel lan t’ s u noppos ed moti on to di smi ssthe appeal , i s o f the opini on that the moti on s houl d be g ra nted. SeeT EX . R. A PP . P. 4 2.1(a). Appel lan t’ s mot ion to dis mis s i s g ra nted, and the a ppeal i s h ereby DI SM ISSE D. Cos ts w il l be ta x ed ag ain st appel lan t. SeeT EX . R. A PP . P. 4 2.1( d)( "Abse nt ag re ement of the par

ti es, the cour

t w il l tax cos ts ag ain st the a ppel lan t.")

. Hav ing di smi ss ed the a ppeal atappell ant’ s req uest , no moti on for re hear ing w il l be ent ertai ned, and our mandate w il l is sue forthw it h.

PERC UR IAM Me moran dum Opi nio n del ivered and filed thi s t he 15t h day

of Janua ry , 200 9.
#### § 765.23 Annual report.

The Department shall prepare annually a report summarizing pertinent information concerning claims submitted in the previous calendar year, the status of the Department's review of the claims, determinations made regarding the claims, amounts paid for claims approved, and other relevant information concerning this reimbursement program. The report will be available to all interested parties upon written request to the Department's National Nuclear Security Administration Service Center, Office of Technical Services, Environmental Programs Department, P.O. Box 5400, Albuquerque, NM 87185-5400 and will also be available in the Department's Freedom of Information Reading room, 1000 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC.

[59 FR 26726, May 23, 1994, as amended at 68 FR 32957, June 3, 2003]
# EUR-Lex - 31986R1323 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31986R1323

**Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1323/86 of 5 May 1986 amending Regulation (EEC) No 1351/72 on the recognition of producer groups for hops **

*
Official Journal L 117 , 06/05/1986 P. 0012 - 0012 Finnish special edition: Chapter 3 Volume 20 P. 0201 Swedish special edition: Chapter 3 Volume 20 P. 0201 *

*****

COMMISSION REGULATION (EEC) No 1323/86

of 5 May 1986

amending Regulation (EEC) No 1351/72 on the recognition of producer groups for hops

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 1696/7 of 26 July 1971 on the common organization of the market in hops (1), as last amended by Council Regulation (EEC) No 3800/85 of 31 December 1985 (2), and in particular Article 7 (5) thereof,

Whereas Council Regulation (EEC) No 3332/85 of 26 November 1985 amending Regulation (EEC) No 1696/71 on the common organization of the market in hops (3) amended Article 7 of the latter in such a way as to permit producer groups to use aid to take not only measures leading to a greater concentration of supply and greater market stability by marketing the entire production of their members but also measures by means of which production can be improved and adapted to the requirements of the market; whereas Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1351/72 (4), containing the rules for the application of the said Article 7 should be adapted accordingly;

Whereas the measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Hops,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

In Article 1 (1) (b) (cc) the following is inserted after the words 'market stabilization measures':

'as also for measures to improve and adapt production to market requirements'.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 5 May 1986.

For the Commission

Frans ANDRIESSEN

Vice-President

(1) OJ No L 175, 4. 8. 1971, p. 1.

(2) OJ No L 367, 31. 12. 1985, p. 32.

(3) OJ No L 318, 29. 11. 1985, p. 1.

(4) OJ No L 148, 30. 6. 1972, p. 13.
# PGI 223.370 Safety precautions for ammunition and explosives.

- PGI 223.370-4 Procedures. 

**Parent topic:**PGI 223.3 -HAZARDOUS MATERIAL IDENTIFICATION AND MATERIAL SAFETY DATA
###### Editorial Note on Part 725

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 725 appear at 88 FR 41292, June 26, 2023.

#### § 725.6 Categories of available information.

For administrative purposes DOE has categorized Restricted Data which will be made available to permittees in the categories as set forth in appendix A to this part. Top Secret information; information pertaining to the design, manufacture or utilization of atomic weapons; and defense information other than Restricted Data are not included in these categories and will not be made available under this part.
#### State of Connecticut *v.*Kent K. Huey

*Joette Katz,*assistant public defender, in support of the petition.

*Lawrence J. Tytla,*deputy assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.

Decided June 20, 1984

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 1 Conn. App. 724, is granted, limited to sentencing only.
Exhibit 10.19



 Exhibit 10.19 
 Danaher Corporation 
 Description of
Non-Management Director Compensation Arrangements 
 Following is a description of the compensation arrangements for
each of the Company’s non-management directors. For 2010, our non-management directors receive: 
  

	 	•	 	 an annual cash retainer of $40,000, paid in four, equal installments following each quarter of service; 


  

	 	•	 	 $2,500 for each board meeting they attend (whether by telephone or in person); 


  

	 	•	 	 $1,000 for each committee meeting they attend (whether by telephone or in person); 


  

	 	•	 	 an annual grant of options to purchase 4,000 shares of Danaher common stock with a ten-year term, which grant is fully vested as of the date of grant;
and 


  

	 	•	 	 payment of or reimbursement for Danaher-related out-of-pocket expenses, including travel expenses. 


 In addition, the chair of each of the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Nominating and Governance Committee receives an annual retainer of
$15,000, paid in quarterly installments. 
 Each non-employee director can elect to defer all or a part of the cash director fees that he or she
receives with respect to a particular year under the Non-Employee Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan, which is a sub-plan under the 2007 Stock Incentive Plan. Amounts deferred under the plan are converted into a particular number of phantom
shares of Danaher common stock, calculated based on the closing price on the quarterly date that such fees would otherwise have been paid. A director may elect to have his or her plan balance distributed upon cessation of Board service, or one, two,
three, four or five years after cessation of Board service. All distributions from the plan are in the form of shares of Danaher common stock.
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 14

- 792V

Filed: November 21 , 2014

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

MORGAN KRUGER, *

*

Petitioner, * Ruling on entitlement; Concession;

v. * Cause

- in

- fact; SIRVA; Influenza

*

SECRETARY OF HEALTH *

AND HUMAN SERVICES, *

*

Respondent. *

*

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT 1

Vowell , Special Master:

On August 29 , 2014

, Morgan Kruger filed a petition for compensation under the

National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa

- 10, et seq

, 2 [ the

“Vaccine Act” or “Program”]

. The petition alleges that as a result of the administration

of an influenza vaccination on January 10, 2013 , Petitioner developed a shoulder injury

rel ated to vaccine administration the effects of which she suffered longer than six

months. Petition at p . 1.

On November 19 , 2014

, R espondent filed a status report in this case conceding

that Petitioner ’ s claim is appropriate for compensation under the Vaccine Act. (ECF No.

18, p. 1.) Specifically, Respondent stated that “ Respondent ’ s position is that petitioner

meets all of the criteria for Shoulder Injur y Related to Vaccine Administration (SIRVA)

as set forth by the upcoming Vaccine Injury Table. Therefore it is recommended that

compensation be awarded under the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program since the

1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I intend to

post this ruling and order on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with the

E

- Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107

- 347 , § 205, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (codified as amended at 44

U.S.C. § 3501 note (2006)) . In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and

move to delete medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwa rranted

invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will

delete such material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99

- 660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinaf ter, for

ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. §

300aa (2006).preponderance of the medical evidence indicat es that the injury identified in the petition

is causally related to the vaccine

. ” 3 ( Id .)

In view of respondent’s concession and the evidence before me, I find that

petitioner is entitle d to compensation

.

s/Denise K. Vowe ll

Denise K. Vowell

Chief Special Master

3 Although the status report does not explicitly use the term “concede ” or “concession

, ” Of fice of Special

Masters S taff A ttorney Daniel Horner confirmed orally during a status conference with the parties on

November 21, 2014, that the status report was intended by Respondent ’s counsel as a concession

regarding entitlement in this case and that her client understood and intended that a ruling on entitlement

would result

.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsAnalysis of Tank PMD Rewetting Following Thrust ResettlingRecent investigations have successfully demonstrated closed-form analytical solutions of spontaneous capillary flows in idealized cylindrical containers with interior corners. In this report, the theory is extended and applied to complex containers modeling spacecraft fuel tanks employing propellant management devices (PMDs). The specific problem investigated is one of spontaneous rewetting of a typical partially filled liquid fuel/cryogen tank with PMD after thrust resettling. The transients of this flow impact the logistics of orbital maneuvers and potentially tank thermal control. The general procedure to compute the initial condition (mean radius of curvature for the interface) for the closed-form transient flows is first outlined then solved for several 'complex' cylindrical tanks exhibiting symmetry. The utility and limitations of the technique as a design tool are discussed in a summary, which also highlights comparisons with NASA flight data of a model propellant tank with PMD.Document ID20020090943Acquisition SourceGlenn Research CenterDocument TypeContractor Report (CR)AuthorsWeislogel, M. M.*(Portland State Univ. OR United States)*Sala, M. A.*(Portland State Univ. OR United States)*Collicott, S. H.*(Purdue Univ. West Lafayette, IN United States)*Rame, EnriqueDate AcquiredSeptember 7, 2013Publication DateOctober 1, 2002Subject CategoryFluid Mechanics And ThermodynamicsReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.26:211974NASA/CR-2002-211974E-13618Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 101-13-0BCONTRACT_GRANT: NAS3-00126Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20020090943.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of the Company on Form
10-K for the period ended June 30, 2015 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
I, Paul Forgue, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title
18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                                         
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.



Date: September 28, 2015



|By:                                                        | /s/ Paul Forgue | 
|---------------------------------------------------------- | --------------- | 
|Name:  Paul Forgue                                         |                
|Title:  Chief Financial Officer & Chief Operations Officer |
April 17, 2006

To: Aurora Gold Corporation
3540 West 41st Avenue, Suite 204
Vancouver, BC V6N 3E6

Tel. 604-687-4432
Fax 604-687-4709

Attention: Cameron Richardson
Email: c.richardson@telus.net
       ----------------------


From: Tomas Almeida, Certified Translator

Re: Translation of Memorandum of Understanding regarding Branca de Neve Project


                            Translator's Declaration

I,  Tomas  Almeida,  Certified  Portuguese to English Translator, Member in good
standing  of  the  Society  of  Translators and Interpreters of British Columbia
(STIBC),  which  is  a  member  association  of  the  Canadian  Translators  and
Interpreters Council (CTIC), hereby attest that, to the best of my knowledge and
belief, the above-mentioned document is a true, correct and complete translation
of  the  Portuguese  document  presented  to  me.


Tomas  Almeida


Tomas Almeida
19780 Honeydew Drive
Pitt Meadows, BC V3Y 2S6

Tel. 604-465-6128
Fax 604-465-6129
Cell.604-202-0031
Email: talmeida@telus.net
       ------------------
###### Editorial Note on Part 63

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 63 appear at 81 FR 86909, Dec. 2, 2016.

#### § 63.23 Elimination of repetition.

In its application or environmental impact statement, DOE may incorporate, by reference, information contained in previous applications, statements, or reports filed with the Commission, if the references are clear and specific and copies of the information incorporated are made available to the public locations near the site of the proposed geologic repository, as specified in § 63.22(d).
§ 780.1 Scope. The regulations in this part establish the procedures, terms, and conditions for Patent Compensation Board: ( a ) Proceedings to declare a patent affected with the public interest pursuant to section 153a of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (Pub. L. 83-703; 42 U.S.C. 2183);
( b ) Proceedings to determine a reasonable royalty fee pursuant to section 157 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954;
( c ) Proceedings for the grant of an award pursuant to section 157 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954;
( d ) Proceedings to obtain compensation pursuant to section 173 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 and the Invention Secrecy Act (35 U.S.C. 183);
And for applications to the Department of Energy (DOE) for a patent license pursuant to sections 153b(2) and 153c of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954.
### .Archer. Torlanda (OST) From: 

### Sent: 

### To: " Joanne Young [Jyoung@yklaw.com] Monday, April 04, 2011 1:29 PM Archer, Torlanda (OST) 

### Cc: Gaynes, Jeffrey (OST); Gretch, Paul (OST); Lehman, Dayton (OST); Flemmings, Reather (OST); David Kirstein; Lyndsey Grunewald 

### Subject: Attachments: Categories: FW: Spirit Airlines Waiver Request
- Cuba Charters Spirit Waiver Request 3-29-11.pdf Red Category

Thank you. We will serve the waiver application immediately, follow up with a telephone poll and send you the results as soon as possible

Joanne W. Young Managing Partner Kirstein & Young, PLLC 1750 K Street, NW Suite 200 Washington, DC 20006 Phone: (202) 331-3348 X 222 Fax: (202) 331-3933 Email: jyounq@yklaw.com 

### From: Torlanda.Archer@dot.gov [mailto:Torlanda.Archer@dot.gov] 

### Sent: Monday, April 04, 2011 

### 1:17 PM To: Joanne Young Cc: David Kirstein; Jeffrey.Gaynes@dot.gov; PauI.Gretch@dot.gov; Dayton.Lehman@dot.gov; Reather.Flemmings@dot.gov 

### Subject: FW: Spirit Airlines Waiver Request
- Cuba Charters 

## DearMs. Young, o



## Wenote thatSpirit did not serve its waiver application on any parties outside the Departmentof Transportation. Inorderfor us to process the application, we ask you to serve it

## on the following attorneys, each ofwhom represents a Cuba charteroperatorwith a long history offiling public charterprospectuses involving travel to andfrom Cuba.
LonniePera: GulfstreamAirlines, ABC Charters, etc. SusanJollie: C&TCharters, PierreMurphy:WilsonInt'I. Service, Inc JoshRomanow: XaeI Charters**S~, 7Ml4d4~.**  

### Special Authorities Division, X46 

### USDOT 

### lOST/alA

### 1200 NewJersey Ave., SE 

### W-86-445 

### Washington, DC 20509 202 366-2396 

### Fax: 202 366 3694 Visit ourwebsite at: httpflostlLxweb.dot.gov!aviation!X-40%20Role Fites!publiccharters.htm 

### From: Joanne Young [mailto:Jyoung@yklaw.coml 

### Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2011 12:01 PM 

### To: Archer, Torlanda (OST) Cc: Kurland, Susan (OST); Gretch, Paul COST); Rosenberg, Esta COST); David Kirstein 

### Subject: Spirit Airlines Waiver Request
- Cuba Charters

Dear Ms. Archer,
Please see the attached letter on behalf of 

### Spirit Airlines requesting a waiver ofthe financial security arrangements requiredby 14 CFR 

### §§ 212.7, 212.8, 380.34, 380.34a, and 380.35 specifically in connection with the sale and operation ofCubacharter flights from Fort Lauderdale Intemational Airport.. Please advise ifyou need additional information. Respectfully submitted,
Joanne W. Young David M. Kirstein Counsel for Spirit Airlines

Joanne W. Young Managing Partner Kirstein & Young, PLLC 1750 K Street, NW Suite 200 Washington, DC 20006 Phone: (202) 331-3348 X 222 Fax: (202) 331-3933 Email: jyoung@yklaw.com

2
§ 780.47 Conditions and issuance of license. ( a ) Upon receipt of the Board's decision and instruction to issue a patent license, the General Counsel shall issue a license which complies with the following: ( 1 ) The scope and durations of such use shall be limited to the purpose for which it was authorized;
( 2 ) Such use shall be non-exclusive;
( 3 ) Such use shall be non-assignable, except with that part of the enterprise or goodwill that enjoys such use;
( 4 ) Any such use shall be authorized predominantly for the supply of the U.S. market; and,
( 5 ) Authorization for such use shall be liable, subject to adequate protection of the legitimate interests of the persons so authorized, to be terminated if and when the circumstances that led to it cease to exist and are unlikely to recur.
( b ) The Board shall have the authority to review, on motivated request, the continued existence of these circumstances. The parties will propose and agree on a reasonable royalty fee within a reasonable time as determined by the General Counsel. A reasonable royalty shall provide adequate remuneration for the circumstances of each case, taking into account the economic value of the authorization. If a party does not agree with the terms and conditions of the license as determined by the General Counsel or if a royalty fee cannot be agreed upon within the reasonable time period established by the General Counsel, any party may, within 30 days after the expiration of such time period, initiate a proceeding before the Board, in accordance with subpart E of this part, for a reconsideration of the General Counsel's determination. After the proceeding under subpart E of this part is completed, the General Counsel shall modify the patent license in accordance with the Board's determination.
[46 FR 39581, Aug. 4, 1981, as amended at 58 FR 68734, Dec. 29, 1993]
IV 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 764 

Recognizing and honoring firefighters for their many contributions throughout 

the history of the Nation. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 5, 2006 

Mr. WELDON of Pennsylvania submitted the following resolution; which was 

referred to the Committee on Government Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing and honoring firefighters for their many 

contributions throughout the history of the Nation. 

Whereas in 1736 Benjamin Franklin founded the Union Fire 

Company, the first volunteer fire company; 

Whereas there are more than 1,100,000 firefighters in the 

United States; 

Whereas approximately 75 percent of all firefighters are volunteers who receive little or no compensation for their heroic work; 

Whereas career and combination fire departments protect 3 

out of 4 Americans; 

Whereas there are more than 30,000 fire departments in the 

United States; 


rfake on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 764 IH 

Whereas approximately 100 firefighters die in the line of duty 

each year; 

Whereas Congress recognizes that Christopher Nicholas 

Kangas was a heroic firefighter; 

Whereas more than 340 firefighters died responding to the 

terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001; 

Whereas firefighters respond to more than 24,000,000 calls 

during an average year; 

Whereas firefighters also provide emergency medical services 

and life safety education; and 

Whereas it is estimated that on April 7, 2005, more than 

2,000 firefighters will attend the 17th Annual National 

Fire and Emergency Services Dinner and Seminars: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives honors 

2 and recognizes the more than 1,100,000 firefighters in the 

3 United States for their contributions to and sacrifice for 

4 the Nation. 

Æ 


rfake on PROD1PC77 with BILLS
ALASKA SEAFOOD CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE 

EPA-HQ-OW-2013-0652

DCN: 00077CBI

THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT 

CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION 

(CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.