alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of Thomas G. Meehan, Appellant, v. Alfred J. Lehmann et al., Constituting the Board of Zoning Appeals of the City of Glen Cove, Respondents.

In a proceeding pursuant to article 78 of the CPLR to review a determination of the respondent Board of Zoning Appeals, dated May 8, 1967, denying petitioner permission to erect a motor vehicle filling station as a special use under the Building Zone Ordinance of the City of Glen Cove, petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered August 22, 1967, which dismissed the petition. Judgment *824reversed, on the law, without costs, and matter remitted to the respondent Board of Zoning Appeals for further proceedings not inconsistent herewith. We agree with the holding of Mr. Justice Brennan at Special Term that the board’s finding that “the addition of the proposed station would create a traffic hazard at this time ” was not a proper basis for the board’s determinar tion, since there is no evidence in the record to support this finding. In our opinion, the record is inadequate with respect to the question of public convenience and necessity. The board had no evidence before it as to why gas stations in Glen Cove had been closed in previous years, a circumstance upon which the board relied. Such closings may well' have been unrelated to a lack of need of the community in the area sought to be served by the instant application. There was evidence that the two relatively new shopping centers located across Forest Avenue from the proposed station and the general traffic flow justified this additional. station. More evidence should have been introduced, as well, to show the impact of the greatly expanded population growth of the community of Glen Cove relevant to the claim that an additional gas station at this location would not serve the public convenience and the needs of the public. The denial of a special permit for a use in an area in which such use may be permitted in discretion is an act quasi-judicial in character subject to. judicial renew, even though performed by a body having legislative power. Such denial must be predicated upon a reasonable basis within the constitutional requirements of equal protection and due process, and upon substantial evidence supporting a holding that the permit has not been refused arbitrarily or diseriminatorily (35 Brooklyn L. Rev., 264; and cases there tiited). Benjamin, Martuscello and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur; Hopkins, Acting P. J., and Munder, J., dissent and vote to affirm the judgment, with the following memorandum : We find substantial evidence to support the Board of Zoning Appeals’ denial of the special use permit with respect to both the public interest or lack of need for an additional gasoline service station and the creation of a vehicular and pedestrian traffic hazard at the busy intersection adjacent to the subject property. In the latter context, however, we do not agree with Special Term that the omission of the word “undue” from the board’s decision renders its finding as to traffic hazard inadequate or that the record lacks sufficient evidence of hazard.
Editorial Note on Part 51
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 51 appear at 80 FR 74980, Dec. 1, 2015.

§ 51.28 Scoping—participants. ( a ) The appropriate NRC staff director shall invite the following persons to participate in the scoping process: ( 1 ) The applicant or the petitioner for rulemaking;
( 2 ) Any person who has petitioned for leave to intervene in the proceeding or who has been admitted as a party to the proceeding;
( 3 ) Any other Federal agency which has jurisdiction by law or special expertise with respect to any environmental impact involved or which is authorized to develop and enforce relevant environmental standards;
( 4 ) Affected State and local agencies, including those authorized to develop and enforce relevant environmental standards;
( 5 ) Any affected Indian Tribe; and
( 6 ) Any person who has requested an opportunity to participate in the scoping process.
( b ) The appropriate NRC staff director may also invite any other appropriate person to participate in the scoping process.
( c ) Participation in the scoping process for an environmental impact statement does not entitle the participant to become a party to the proceeding to which the environmental impact statement relates. Participation in an adjudicatory proceeding is governed by the procedures in §§ 2.309 and 2.315 of this chapter. Participation in a rulemaking proceeding in which the Commission has decided to have a hearing is governed by the provisions in the notice of hearing.
[49 FR 9381, Mar. 12, 1984, as amended at 74 FR 62682, Dec. 1, 2009]
IV 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 660 

Supporting the goals and ideals of National Mentoring Month. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 31, 2006 

Mr. OSBORNE (for himself, Ms. MCCOLLUM of Minnesota, Mr. HONDA, Mr. 

BOSWELL, Mr. VAN HOLLEN, Mrs. TAUSCHER, Mr. SIMPSON, Mr. WAXMAN, Mr. KELLER, Mr. CRENSHAW, Mr. GRIJALVA, Mr. SCHIFF, Mr. 

DAVIS of Illinois, and Mrs. BIGGERT) submitted the following resolution; 

which was referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce 

RESOLUTION 

Supporting the goals and ideals of National Mentoring 

Month. 

Whereas youth mentoring is a centuries-old concept, through 

which a dependable adult provides guidance, support, and 

encouragement to help a young person become a responsible, productive adult; 

Whereas mentoring, when done well, helps young people stay 

in school and improve academically, boosts self-esteem 

and communication skills, and improves the chances of 

going on to higher education; 

Whereas there are thousands of mentoring programs in communities of all sizes across the United States, focused on 

building strong, effective relationships between caring 
2 

•HRES 660 IH 

and responsible adults and young people who need positive adult role models; 

Whereas in spite of the great benefits mentoring provides, 

America has a serious mentoring gap, with more than 15 

million young people currently in need of caring adult 

role models; 

Whereas the demand for mentoring far exceeds the current 

capacity of local mentoring programs and the number of 

adults who currently volunteer as mentors; 

Whereas on December 22, 2005, the President designated 

January 2006 as National Mentoring Month to focus the 

Nation’s attention on the essential role mentoring plays 

in the lives of young people; 

Whereas the month-long celebration of mentoring will encourage more individuals and organizations, including schools, 

businesses, nonprofit organizations, faith institutions, 

and foundations, to become engaged in mentoring; and 

Whereas National Mentoring Month will, most importantly, 

build awareness of mentoring and recruit more individuals to become mentors, helping close our Nation’s mentoring gap: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) supports the goals and ideals of National 

3 Mentoring Month; 

4 (2) acknowledges the hard work of individuals 

5 and groups who promote mentoring and who are ob6 serving the month with appropriate ceremonies and 

7 activities that promote awareness of and volunteer 

8 involvement with youth mentoring; and 
3 

•HRES 660 IH 

1 (3) recognizes with gratitude the contributions 

2 of the millions of caring adults who are already serv3 ing as mentors and encourages more adults to volun4 teer as mentors. 

Æ
# EUR-Lex - 31978R2112 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31978R2112

**Council Regulation (EEC) No 2112/78 of 25 July 1978 concerning the conclusion of the Customs Convention on the international transport of goods under cover of TIR carnets (TIR Convention) of 14 November 1975 at Geneva **

*
Official Journal L 252 , 14/09/1978 P. 0001 - 0001 Finnish special edition: Chapter 7 Volume 2 P. 0036 Spanish special edition: Chapter 02 Volume 5 P. 0046 Swedish special edition: Chapter 7 Volume 2 P. 0036 Portuguese special edition Chapter 02 Volume 5 P. 0046 *

COUNCIL REGULATION (EEC) No 2112/78 of 25 July 1978 concerning the conclusion of the Customs Convention on the international transport of goods under cover of TIR carnets (TIR Convention) of 14 November 1975 at Geneva

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community,

Having regard to the recommendation from the Commission,

Whereas the conclusion of the Customs Convention on the international transport of goods under cover of TIR carnets (TIR Convention) of 14 November 1975 at Geneva introduces new provisions into the system of international transport of goods by road vehicles ; whereas the nature of the provisions is such as to contribute to the harmonious development of international trade in accordance with the objectives of the European Economic Community;

Whereas it is therefore appropriate that the TIR Convention should be approved on behalf of the Community,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The Customs Convention on the international transport of goods under cover of TIR carnets (TIR Convention) of 14 November 1975 at Geneva is hereby approved on behalf of the European Economic Community.

The text of the Convention and the Annexes thereto is annexed to this Regulation.

Article 2

The President of the Council is hereby authorized to deposit the instrument of ratification on behalf of the Community in accordance with Article 52 (1) (b) of the Convention (1).

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 25 July 1978.

For the Council

The President

K. von DOHNANYI (1)The date of entry into force of the Convention will be published in the Official Journal of the European Communities by the General Secretariat of the Council.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

January 4, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

132336 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 132336 

 COA: 270820 

Oakland CC: 03-190746-FH 

GERALD WILLIAM MOLIK,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 6, 2006 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

p1218 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

January 4, 2007 

 Clerk
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7200 

To extend indemnity for wildfires and hurricanes, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 29, 2018 

Mr. AUSTIN SCOTT of Georgia introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Agriculture 

A BILL 

To extend indemnity for wildfires and hurricanes, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Wildfires and Hurri5 canes Indemnity Program Extension Act of 2018’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EXTENSION. 

7 Title I of subdivision 1 of division B of the Bipartisan 

8 Budget Act of 2018 (Public Law 115–123) is amended 

9 under the heading ‘‘Department of Agriculture—Agricul10 tural Programs—Processing, Research and Marketing— 

11 Office of the Secretary’’— 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•HR 7200 IH

1 (1) by striking ‘‘December 31, 2019’’ and in2 serting ‘‘December 31, 2020’’; 

3 (2) by inserting ‘‘Florence, Michael,’’ after 

4 ‘‘Maria,’’; and 

5 (3) by inserting ‘‘or 2018’’ after ‘‘occurring in 

6 calendar year 2017’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
H. Res. 667 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

December 19, 2017. 

Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall 

be in order to consider the conference report to accompany 

the bill (H.R. 1) to provide for reconciliation pursuant to titles II and V of the concurrent resolution on the budget for 

fiscal year 2018. All points of order against the conference 

report and against its consideration are waived. The conference report shall be considered as read. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the conference report 

to its adoption without intervening motion except: (1) one 

hour of debate; and (2) one motion to recommit if applicable. 

Clause 5(b) of rule XXI shall not apply to the conference report. 

SEC. 2. Upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in 

order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 3312) to amend 

the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act to specify when bank holding companies may be subject to certain enhanced supervision, and for other purposes. 

All points of order against consideration of the bill are 
2 

•HRES 667 EH 

waived. In lieu of the amendment recommended by the Committee on Financial Services now printed in the bill, an 

amendment in the nature of a substitute consisting of the 

text of Rules Committee Print 115–49, modified by the 

amendment printed in the report of the Committee on Rules 

accompanying this resolution, shall be considered as adopted. 

The bill, as amended, shall be considered as read. All points 

of order against provisions in the bill, as amended, are 

waived. The previous question shall be considered as ordered 

on the bill, as amended, and on any further amendment 

thereto, to final passage without intervening motion except: 

(1) one hour of debate equally divided and controlled by the 

chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on Financial Services; and (2) one motion to recommit with or 

without instructions. 

SEC. 3. The requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII for 

a two-thirds vote to consider a report from the Committee on 

Rules on the same day it is presented to the House is waived 

with respect to any resolution reported through the remainder 

of the first session of the One Hundred Fifteenth Congress. 

SEC. 4. It shall be in order at any time through the remainder of the first session of the One Hundred Fifteenth 

Congress for the Speaker to entertain motions that the 

House suspend the rules as though under clause 1 of rule 

XV. The Speaker or his designee shall consult with the Mi-
3 

•HRES 667 EH 

nority Leader or her designee on the designation of any matter for consideration pursuant to this section. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
Editorial Note on Part 63
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 63 appear at 81 FR 86909, Dec. 2, 2016.

§ 63.305 Required characteristics of the reference biosphere. ( a ) Features, events, and processes that describe the reference biosphere must be consistent with present knowledge of the conditions in the region surrounding the Yucca Mountain site.
( b ) DOE should not project changes in society, the biosphere (other than climate), human biology, or increases or decreases of human knowledge or technology. In all analyses done to demonstrate compliance with this part, DOE must assume that all of those factors remain constant as they are at the time of submission of the license application.
( c ) DOE must vary factors related to the geology, hydrology, and climate based upon cautious, but reasonable assumptions of the changes in these factors that could affect the Yucca Mountain disposal system during the period of geologic stability, consistent with the requirements for performance assessments specified at § 63.342.
( d ) Biosphere pathways must be consistent with arid or semi-arid conditions.
[66 FR 55792, Nov. 2, 2001, as amended at 74 FR 10829, Mar. 13, 2009]
Attachment 21 EFAST

Sanitized
IV 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 705 

Recognizing and congratulating Apolo Anton Ohno for his historic performances in short track speedskating at the 2006 and 2002 Olympic Winter 

Games. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 1, 2006 

Mr. MCDERMOTT submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 

the Committee on Government Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing and congratulating Apolo Anton Ohno for his 

historic performances in short track speedskating at the 

2006 and 2002 Olympic Winter Games. 

Whereas short track speedskater Apolo Anton Ohno was born 

May 22, 1982, in Seattle, Washington; 

Whereas Apolo Anton Ohno’s father, Yuki Ohno, a single, 

Japanese-American parent, never wavered in his support, 

sacrifice, and inspiration to help his son Apolo realize his 

dream of competing in the Olympic Games; 

Whereas Apolo Anton Ohno, at the age of just 23, now has 

five career Olympic medals in short track speedskating, 

tying the record for the most medals by an American 

male at the Olympic Winter Games; 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 705 IH 

Whereas Apolo Anton Ohno’s gold medal in the 500 meters, 

bronze medal in the 1,000 meters, and bronze medal in 

the 5,000 meters relay gave him three medals at the 

2006 Olympic Winter Games in Turin, Italy, making him 

just the fourth Unites States athlete to win that many 

medals at a single Olympic Winter Games; 

Whereas the United States Olympic Team needed every one 

of Apolo Anton Ohno’s medals to edge out the Canadian 

Olympic Team and claim second place in the medal 

standings at the 2006 Olympic Winter Games; and 

Whereas Apolo Anton Ohno, just 19 years old at the time, 

also captured the gold medal in the 1,500 meters and the 

silver medal in the 1,000 meters at the 2002 Olympic 

Winter Games in Salt Lake City, Utah: Now, therefore, 

be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives recog2 nizes and congratulates Apolo Anton Ohno for his historic 

3 performances in short track speedskating at the 2006 and 

4 2002 Olympic Winter Games. 

Æ 


ycherry on PROD1PC64 with BILLS
#### § 780.42 Notice of hearing.

Within thirty (30) days after the filing of the application, the Board will serve on all parties a notice of hearing to be held not later than sixty (60) days after the filing of the application.
(PRINT ON BORROWER’S LETTERHEAD)

ASSURANCES REQUIRED BY 49 CFR SECTION 24.2(A)

The (insect name of borrower) Electric Cooperative assures that it will comply with the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, as amended (Uniform Act), 42 U.S.C. 4601-4655, and with implementing Federal regulations in 49 C.F.R. Part 24 and 7 C.F.R. Part 21.

Specifically, the (insert name of borrower) Electric Cooperative assures that:

(1)	Whenever Federal Financial assistance is used to pay for any part of the cost of a program or project which will result in the displacement of any person;

(a)	Fair and reasonable relocation payments and assistance will be provided to or for displaced persons in accordance with sections 202, 203, and 204 of the Uniform Act;

(b)	Relocation assistance programs offering the services described in section 205 of the Uniform Act shall be provided to displaced persons; and,

(c)	Within a reasonable period of time prior to displacement, comparable replacement dwellings will be available to displaced persons in accordance with section 205 (c) (3) of the Uniform Act.

	Date							President

RELOCATE.DOC  (Computer generated form, Version 2, 12/96)
###### Editorial Note on Part 9

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 9 appear at 82 FR 52825, Nov. 15, 2017.

#### § 9.103 General provisions.

The Secretary shall ensure that all open Commission meetings are held in a location such that there is reasonable space and adequate visibility and acoustics, for public observation. No additional right to participate in Commission meetings is granted to any person by this subpart. An open meeting is not part of the formal or informal record of decision of the matters discussed therein except as otherwise required by law. Statements of views or expressions of opinion made by Commissioners or NRC employees at open meetings are not intended to represent final determinations or beliefs. Such statements may not be pleaded, cited, or relied upon before the Commission or in any proceeding under part 2 of these regulations (10 CFR part 2) except as the Commission may direct. Members of the public attending open Commission meetings may use small electronic sound recorders to record the meeting, but the use of other electronic recording equipment and cameras requires the advance written approval of the Secretary.

[42 FR 12877, Mar. 7, 1977, as amended at 43 FR 13055, Mar. 29, 1978; 43 FR 37421, Aug. 23, 1978]
# EUR-Lex - 31985L0411 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31985L0411

**Commission Directive 85/411/EEC of 25 July 1985 amending Council Directive 79/409/EEC on the conservation of wild birds **

*
Official Journal L 233 , 30/08/1985 P. 0033 - 0041 Spanish special edition: Chapter 15 Volume 6 P. 0084 Portuguese special edition Chapter 15 Volume 6 P. 0084 Finnish special edition: Chapter 15 Volume 7 P. 0061 Swedish special edition: Chapter 15 Volume 7 P. 0061 *

COMMISSION DIRECTIVE

of 25 July 1985

amending Council Directive 79/409/EEC on the conservation of wild birds

(85/411/EEC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community,Having regard to Council Directive 79/409/EEC of 2 April 1979 on the conservation of wild birds (1), as last amended

by Directive 81/854/EEC (2), in particular Article 15 thereof,Whereas Annex I to Directive 79/409/EEC should be altered to take account of the latest information on the situation as regards avifauna;Whereas the provisions of this Directive are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee to adapt Directive 79/409/EEC to technical and scientific progress,HAS ADOPTED THIS DIRECTIVE:

Article 1

Annex I to Directive 79/409/EEC shall be replaced by the Annex to this Directive.

Article 2

1. Member States shall bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive on 31 July 1986.2. They shall forthwith inform the Commission thereof.

Article 3

This Directive is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 25 July 1985.For the Commission,

Stanley CLINTON DAVIS

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ N° L 103, 25. 4. 1979, p. 1.

(2) OJ N° L 319, 7. 11. 1981, p. 3.