alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 247 (Monday, December 27, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 81205]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-32419]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT


Renewal of the Advisory Committee on Voluntary Foreign Aid

AGENCY: United States Agency for International Development.

ACTION: Notice of renewal of advisory committee.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Federal Advisory Committee Act, the 
Administrator of USAID has determined that renewal of the Advisory 
Committee on Voluntary Foreign Aid for a two-year period beginning 
January 15, 2011 is necessary and in the public interest.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Deborah Lewis, 202-712-0936.

    Dated: December 13, 2010.
Benjamin Hubbard,
Executive Director, Advisory Committee on Voluntary Foreign Aid 
(ACVFA), U.S. Agency for International Development.
[FR Doc. 2010-32419 Filed 12-23-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
#### § 1136.3 Exceptions from requirements of this part.

Exceptions are permitted from the administrative requirements in this part only as described at 2 CFR 1126.3.
IV 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 166 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the United States 

postal facility network is an asset of significant value and the United 

States Postal Service should take appropriate measures to maintain, 

modernize and fully utilize the existing post office network for economic 

growth. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 2, 2017 

Mr. AMODEI (for himself and Mr. WELCH) submitted the following resolution; 

which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that 

the United States postal facility network is an asset 

of significant value and the United States Postal Service 

should take appropriate measures to maintain, modernize 

and fully utilize the existing post office network for economic growth. 

Whereas the postal facility network is an integral part of universal service and should be modernized to make universal service relevant for the 21st century; 

Whereas the closure of post offices in rural communities 

would create an economic burden for people in the United 

States that depend on universal service for communication, package services, and non-typical postal services; 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 166 IH 

Whereas the closure process of post offices does not adequately take into account community input; 

Whereas post offices are recognized as secure and trustworthy, and could function as the location for other government services, community events, and emergency services; and 

Whereas post offices have become a part of the identity of 

rural communities, and provide a significant social value: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that the United States Postal Service should 

3 take all appropriate measures to modernize and maintain 

4 a post office network. 

Æ 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
§ 81.3 Communications. All communications concerning the regulations in this part, including applications for licenses, should be sent to the NRC either by mail addressed to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001; by hand delivery to the NRC's offices at 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland; or, where practicable, by electronic submission, for example, via Electronic Information Exchange, or CD-ROM. Electronic submissions must be made in a manner that enables the NRC to receive, read, authenticate, distribute, and archive the submission, and process and retrieve it a single page at a time. Detailed guidance on making electronic submissions can be obtained by visiting the NRC's Web site at *http://www.nrc.gov/site-help/e-submittals.html ;* by e-mail to *MSHD.Resource@nrc.gov ;* or by writing the Office of the Chief Information Officer, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001. The guidance discusses, among other topics, the formats the NRC can accept, the use of electronic signatures, and the treatment of nonpublic information. [68 FR 58823, Oct. 10, 2003, as amended at 74 FR 62685, Dec. 1, 2009; 80 FR 74982, Dec. 1, 2015]
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Miguel Giraud, Appellant.

[814 NYS2d 543]

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated December 27, 1993 *(People v Giraud,*199 AD2d 532 [1993]), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered February 18, 1993.

Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel *(see Jones v Barnes,*463 US 745 [1983]; *People v Stultz,*2 NY3d 277 [2004]). Prudenti, P.J., Florio, Miller and Adams, JJ., concur.
#### § 1108.190 Federal share.

*Federal share* means the portion of the project costs under an award that is paid by Federal funds.
## Williams , Rene e (OST) "jV^CJC ^ b6T-0-Sf>/<^^>vy7^ Subject : FW : Acces s Limitation s t o Chisan a'

. : i ;^-.; l
Origina l Messag e From : Morris , Ally n D [mailto:Allyn.D.Morris@boeing.com ] Sent : Tuesday , Apri l 06 , 201 0 11:2 6 A M To : Little , Cynthi aM (DOT) Subject : Acces s Limitation s t o Chisan a Cindie , Pleas e maintai nChisana , Docke t 98-4574 , a s on e o f th e essentia l ai r servic e locations
. A s a landowne r a t Chisana , I hav e relie do n40-Mil e Ai r t o ge t eithe r peopl e and/o r supplie s i n andou t o f Chisana , includin g mai l service s andunexpecte dmedica l relate dissues
. Chisan a doesn' t hav e roadacces s andi s ove r 8 0 mile s fro mTok , th e closes t airpor t wit hai r service
. Than k you , AllynMorri s (425 ) 299-062 2
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO. 2-06-1180985-183-CV

IN RE TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF FAMILYInN rReE MaArRiInNeErR HeEaAlLtThH CaArReE, InNcC.; InN rReE CaAdDaAlLiInN, L.L.C.	RELATORS

MaArRiInNeErR HeEaAlLtThH CaArReE oOfF NaAsShHvViIlLlLeE 

InNcC.,   

InNdDiIvViIdDuUaAlLlLyY aAnNdD/oOrR dD/bB/aA MaArRiInNeErR 

HeEaAlLtThH 

oOfF FoOrRtT WoOrRtThH; aAnNdD MaArRiInNeErR 

HeEaAlLtThH CaArReE MaAnNaAgGeEmMeEnNtT CoO.	RELATOR

AND PROTECTIVE SERVICES

	------------

	ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

	------------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1

	------------

	The court has considered relator'’s’ petition for writ of mandamusinjunction and motion for emergency relief and is of the opinion that relief should be denied.  Accordingly, relator'’s’ petition for writ of mandamusinjunction  is iand motion for emergency relief are denied.  In addition, theis court vacates the portiionon io f its April 3, March 24, 2006 order that stayeduiing the trial parrespondednnt’s March 31, 200requirement of production of documents by relators of documents referenced in paragraphs 2 and 3  of of the trial court’s order of February 24, 2006court’s.6 order granting Anderton Developmetnt Group, Ltd.’’s  Motion tTo Lift Abatement ANdAnd Distributte e Interpleeadied Funds in trial court cause number 67- 208771-04.ned

	Relators shall pay all costs of this original proceeding, for which let execution issue.

								PER CURIAM

PANEL ABA:	CAYCE., CL..J.; HOLMAN ,  DAUPHINOT, and WALKER, GARDNER, JJ. ; CAYCE, C.J.; and WALKER, J.

WALKER, J. would request a response.

DELIVERED: May 24, 2005April 724, 2006vacate
##### 



Exhibit 99.1

WESTCORP

CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Westcorp (the Company) on Form
10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify,
to the best of their knowledge and belief and pursuant to 18 U.S.C., Chapter
63, Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the SarbanesOxley Act
of 2002, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and                          
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company.

The foregoing Certification is incorporated solely for purposes of complying
the provisions of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and is not intended to
be used for any other purpose.

WESTCORP

|                                                                                                                                                             
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Ernest S. RadyErnest S. Rady
Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer                                                                           
|                                                                                                                                                             
|/s/ Lee A. WhatcottLee A. Whatcott
Executive Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer and
Chief Operating Officer (Principal Financial and
Accounting Officer)
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 19

- 00306

- CR

The State of Texas
v. Rosie Rangel

On Appeal from the 347th District Court of Nueces County , Texas Trial Cause No. 17FC

- 1805H

JUDGMENT
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on
appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed. The Court orders the appeal

DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion

. We further order this decision certified below for observance.
October 31, 2019
SERVED: JULY 24, 2012 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION · OFFICE OF HEARINGS WASHINGTON, DC INTHEMATTER OF SKYWEST AIRLINES FAADOCKETNO. [TOBEASSIGNED] (Civil Penalty Action)' FDMS NO. FAA-Q012-0776 NOTICE OlfASSIGNMENT OFPROCEEDING This proceeding

### (hereto~ore designated as Case No. 2011NM060049) has been assigned toAdministrativeLawJudgeRichard C. Goodwin. All future pleadings and other communicationsregarding this proceeding shall be served ontheJudge, theFAA HearingDocket, andthe otherpersons ori the attached ServiceList. ·



# ..

Attachment - ServiceList 

## 2: 

## 09FDMS No. FAA-2012-0776 (Civil Penalty Action) SERVICE LIST ORIGINAL & ONE COPY Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1 000 1 ONE COPY Todd C. Emerson, Respondent's Counsel Director, Government and Legal Affairs SkyWest Airlines 444 South River Road

St. George, UT 84 790 TEL: 435-634-3530 FAJ(: 435-634-3505 Jeffrey**~.** Harper, Complainant's Counsel Attorney, Office of the Regional Counsel Northwest Mountain Region, ANM-7 Federal Aviation Administration 1601 Lind Avenue, S.W. Renton, WA 98057 TEL: 425-227-2161 FAJ(: 425-227-1007

The Honorable Richard Q. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge Office of Hearings, M-20 U.S. Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL:· 202-366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 202-366-5121 Staff Assistant FAJ(: 202-366-7536

.. 1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S. W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000812075
<NAME> UNO RESTAURANT CORP.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-03-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-28-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-27-1999
<CASH>                                           1,311
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,804
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      2,449
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 5,853
<PP&E>                                         206,940
<DEPRECIATION>                                  77,858
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 147,353
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           24,378
<BONDS>                                         47,906
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           138
<OTHER-SE>                                      74,931<F1>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   147,353
<SALES>                                        152,546
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               152,546
<CGS>                                           39,397
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  141,887
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   152
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,409
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,098
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,673
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,425
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,425
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.52
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.52
<FN>
<F1>Net of Treasury Stock
</FN>


</TABLE>
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS

Appeal of

- )

)

Quality Trust, Inc. ) ASBCA No. 62576

)

Under Contract No. FA2517

- 19

- P

- A083 )

APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT : Mr. Lawrence M. Ruiz

President

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Jeffrey P. Hildebrant, Esq.

Air Force Deputy Chief Trial Attorney

Jason R. Smith, Esq.

Trial Attorney

ORDER OF PARTIAL DISMISSAL

On October 29, 2020

, the government filed a motion for partial dismissal.

Appellant’s notice of appeal of a termination for cause included a “ total amount in

dispute” of approximately $323,000. Appellant had not filed a certified claim for the

$323,000. On January 12, 2021

, appellant responded to the motion agreeing to the

partial dismissal. Accordingly, that portion of the appeal relating to the $323,000 i s

dismissed without prejudice. The government’s termination for cause remains before

the Board.

Date: February 1 8 , 2021

CRAIG S. CLARKE

Administrative Judge

Armed Services Board

of Contract Appeals2 I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Partial Dismissal of the

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 62576

, Appeal of Quality

Trust, Inc. , rendered in conformance with the Board’s Charter.

Dated: February 18, 2021

PAULLA K. GATES

- LEWIS

Recorder, Armed Services

Board of Contract Appeals
Subpart 2103.5 - Other Improper Business

Practices

Parent topic: PART 2103 - IMPROPER BUSINESS PRACTICES AND PERSONAL CONFLICTS OF

INTEREST

2103.570 Misleading, Deceptive, or Unfair Advertising.

(a) OPM, or the Contractor with the approval of OPM, makes available to Federal employees a

booklet describing the provisions of the FEGLI Program, which includes information about eligibility,

enrollment, and general procedures. The booklet, along with valid election documents, serves as

certification of the employee's coverage under the FEGLI Program. Any marketing/advertising

directed specifically at Federal employees and life insurance contacts with Federal employees for

the purpose of selling FEGLI Program coverage must be approved by OPM in advance.

(b) The Contractor is prohibited from making incomplete and/or incorrect comparisons or using

disparaging or minimizing techniques to compare its other products or services to those of the

FEGLI Program. The Contractor agrees that any advertising material authorized and released by the

Contractor which mentions the FEGLI Program will be truthful and not misleading and will present

an accurate statement of FEGLI Program benefits. The Contractor will use reasonable efforts to

assure that agents selling its other products are aware of and abide by this prohibition.

(c) The contractor's failure to conform to the requirements of this subpart shall be considered by

OPM in the determination of the service charge prenegotiation objective.

2103.571 Contract clause.

The clause at 2152.203-70 shall be inserted in FEGLI Program contracts and in subcontracts.
#### MERCHANTS’ NAT. BANK v. SANTA MARIA SUGAR CO.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

June 19, 1914.)

Action by the Merchants’ National Bank against the Santa Maria Sugar Company.

No opinion. Motion for leave to go to Court of Appeals granted. Order signed. For former opinion, see 147 N. Y. Supp. 498.
#### Mary L. Hays, as Administratrix of the Estate of Harold J. Hays, Deceased, Appellant, v. Edward P. McBride, Respondent.

In an action to recover damages for wrongful death, plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, entered November 20, 1968 in favor of defendant, upon the trial court’s dismissal of the complaint at the close of plaintiff’s case upon a jury trial on the issues of liability. Judgment reversed, on the law, and new trial granted, with costs to abide the event. The questions of fact have not been considered. In our opinion, although a verdict in favor of plaintiff might have been on a very weak foundation, a prima facie ease was made out and it was error to dismiss the complaint (cf. *Pfaffenbach*v. *White Plains Express Corp.,*17 N Y 2d 132; *Wragge*v. *Lizza Asphalt Constr. Co.,*17 N Y 2d 313; *Czekala*v. *Meehan,*27 A D 2d 565). Hopkins, Kleinfeld, Brennan and Benjamin, JJ., concur; Christ, P. J., dissents and votes to affirm the judgment, with the following memorandum: This is a wrongful death action. On the trial, defendant (called as a witness by plaintiff) testified that he was operating a panel truck in the single northbound lane of Lewis Road when the decedent’s car, proceeding in the single southbound lane, rounded a curve, crossed a double white line separating the north and south lanes, and struck the panel truck, which had slowed to about five miles per hour while angling to the extreme right of the northbound lane. It was conceded on the trial that the decedent’s car had in fact crossed the lines and had collided with the panel truck in the truck’s proper lane. About a week after the accident, defendant pleaded guilty to a charge of operating the truck with unsafe tires in violation of section 375 of the Vehicle and Traffic Law. In my opinion, the complaint was properly dismissed at the end of plaintiff’s ease. While driving with unsafe tires may have been negligence on defendant’s part, there is no basis in the record, short of sheer speculation, for a finding that such negligence was a proximate cause of this accident. *(O’Neill*v. *Hamill,*22 A D 2d 691, 692.) Nor was defendant, *956confronted with an emergency situation not of his own making, obliged to exercise the 'best possible judgment in the operation of his truck when the decedent’s ear came into the northbound lane *(Rowlands*v. *Parks,*2 N Y 2d 64, 67; cf. *Palmer*v. *Palmer,*31 A D 2d 876, 877). The decedent’s contributory negligence was established prima facie when it was conceded that his car had come over onto the wrong side of the road *(Pfaffenbach*v. *White Plains Express Corp.,*17 N Y 2d 132, 135) and there is not the slightest basis in the evidence to justify an exculpatory explanation for his presence there.
PGI 236.273 Construction in foreign countries.       (b) When a technical working agreement with a foreign government is required for a construction contract—          (i) Consider inviting the Army Office of the Chief of Engineers, or the Naval Facilities Engineering Command, to participate in the negotiations.          (ii) The agreement should, as feasible and where not otherwise provided for in other agreements, cover all elements necessary for the construction that are required by laws, regulations, and customs of the United States and the foreign government, including—          (A) Acquisition of all necessary rights;          (B) Expeditious, duty-free importation of labor, material, and equipment;          (C) Payment of taxes applicable to contractors, personnel, materials, and equipment;          (D) Applicability of workers' compensation and other labor laws to citizens of the United States, the host country, and other countries;          (E) Provision of utility services;          (F) Disposition of surplus materials and equipment;          (G) Handling of claims and litigation; and          (H) Resolution of any other foreseeable problems that can be appropriately included in the agreement.    **Parent topic:** PGI 236.2 -SPECIAL ASPECTS OF CONTRACTING FOR CONSTRUCTION
§ 780.22 Opposition, support and request for hearing. ( a ) Any party may, within thirty (30) days after service of the notice or such other time as may be provided by the terms of the notice, file with the Board a written statement in opposition to or in support of the Department's proposed action. Such statement may also include a request for hearing. The statement shall contain a concise description of the facts, law, or any other relevant matter which the party believes should be reviewed by the Board during its consideration of the proposed declaration. If the request for a hearing is timely received, the Board shall call a hearing and provide notice of the time and place to all parties.
( b ) Failure of all parties to oppose the proposed action or to request a hearing within the time specified in the notice shall be deemed an acquiescence to that action and may result in a declaration by the Board that the patent is affected with the public interest.
#### WEBB, Respondent, v. BRADLEY et al., Appellants.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

May 27, 1914.)

Action by Harold Webb, an infant, etc., against Walter Bradley and others.

No opinion. Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.
Exhibit 99.2







                        President's Written Certification
                             Of Financial Statements
                       Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Statute 1350



        Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Statute 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned hereby certifies in his
capacity as president of 4net Software, Inc. (the "Company") that (a) the Annual
Report of the Company on Form 10-QSB for the period ended December 31, 2002
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 and (b) the information contained in such report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of such
period and the results of operations of the Company for such period.






                                            /s/ Steven N. Bronson
                                            ----------------------------------
                                            Steven N. Bronson, President