alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-10.84


    Exhibit
      10.84

    


    OBERON

    SECURITIES

    November
      15, 2005

    Mr.
      Guy Nissenson

    Xfone,
      Inc.

    Britannia
      House

    960
      High
      Road

    London,
      N12 9RY

    United
      Kingdom

    


    Fees
      Due to Oberon Securities, LLC from Xfone, Inc. in connection with past services
      and certain transactions

    


    Dear
      Mr.
      Nissenson:

    


    This
      letter serves as a negotiated agreement of all remaining fees due to Oberon
      Securities, LLC (“Oberon”) from outstanding retainer payments through the end of
      November 2005, non-cash M&A fees related to the acquisition of WS Telecom,
      Inc. (for purposes of clarity this does not include fees due to Oberon from
      either I-55 Telecommunications, LLC. or I-55 Internet Services, Inc. which
      shall
      be paid upon the closing of those respective transactions), and warrants due
      from the financial advisory services provided by Oberon to Xfone, Inc. in
      conjunction with fundraising from Laurus Master Fund, Ltd., Crestview Capital
      Master, LLC, Burlingame
      Equity Investors, LP, Burlingame Equity Investors II, LP, and Burlingame Equity
      Investors (Offshore), Ltd. 

    


    The
      following reflects the agreement between the parties with respect to total
      and
      final consideration due to Oberon pursuant to the Finders Agreement and the
      Financial Consulting Agreement between the parties for said services /
      transactions:

     

    Common
      Shares - $105,000 “Market Value” - defined below

    Warrants
      - 245,000 5-year warrants @ $3.15 strike price 

    


    For
      purposes of this letter agreement, the common shares will be delivered to Oberon
      within 7 calendar days of the effectiveness of the covering registration
      statement (or at any earlier time as may be requested by Oberon). The specific
      number of common shares granted to Oberon on that date shall be equal to (a)
      the
“Market Value” of the shares of common stock due to Oberon; divided by (b) the
      average closing price per share from the three trading days after the date
      the
“resale” registration statement including such shares has been declared
      effective by the SEC (with such average price from this section (b) subject
      to a
      ceiling of $4.00 per share and a floor of $2.00 per share). 

    


    I
      look
      forward to continuing to work with Xfone on its financing and M&A
      needs.

    


    Best
      regards, 

    


    /s/
      Adam Breslawsky

    Adam
      Breslawsky

    


    


    Agreed
      to
      by:

    


    /s/
      Guy Nissenson

    Guy
      Nissenson

    Xfone,
      Inc.

    Chief
      Executive Officer
Editorial Note on Part 851
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 851 appear at 88 FR 41293, June 26, 2023.

§ 851.45 Direction to NNSA contractors. ( a ) Notwithstanding any other provision of this part, the NNSA Administrator, rather than the Enforcement Director, signs, issues and serves the following actions that direct NNSA contractors: ( 1 ) Subpoenas;
( 2 ) Orders to compel attendance;
( 3 ) Disclosures of information or documents obtained during an investigation or inspection;
( 4 ) Preliminary notices of violations; and
( 5 ) Final notices of violations.
( b ) The NNSA Administrator shall act after consideration of the Enforcement Director's recommendation.
[71 FR 6931, Feb. 9, 2006, as amended at 88 FR 41294, June 26, 2023]
# L_2023240EN.01008901.xml

| 28.9.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 240/89 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.9.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 240/89

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE No 219/2020

of 11 December 2020

amending Annex XIII (Transport) to the EEA Agreement [2023/2021]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (“the EEA Agreement”), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Directive (EU) 2020/612 of 4 May 2020 amending Directive 2006/126/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on driving licences (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Directive (EU) 2020/612 of 4 May 2020 amending Directive 2006/126/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on driving licences (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following indent is added in point 24f (Directive 2006/126/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council) of Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘— | 32020 L 0612: Commission Directive (EU) 2020/612 of 4 May 2020 (OJ L 141, 5.5.2020, p. 9).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32020 L 0612: Commission Directive (EU) 2020/612 of 4 May 2020 (OJ L 141, 5.5.2020, p. 9).’

Article 2

The text of Directive (EU) 2020/612 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 12 December 2020, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 11 December 2020.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Sabine MONAUNI

---

(1)  
  OJ L 141, 5.5.2020, p. 9.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
#### In re ZBOROWSKI.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

June 19, 1914.)

In the matter of Margaret Laura Zborowski, deceased.

No opinion. Order (84 Misc. Rep. 342, 145 N. Y. Supp. 1101) affirmed, with costs, on the opinion of Surrogate Fowler. Order filed.
§ 1536.10 What does this part do? This part requires that the award and administration of Environmental Protection Agency grants and cooperative agreements comply with Office of Management and Budget (OMB) guidance implementing the portion of the Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1988 (41 U.S.C. 701-707, as amended, hereafter referred to as “the Act”) that applies to grants. It thereby— ( a ) Gives regulatory effect to the OMB guidance (Subparts A through F of 2 CFR part 182) for the Environmental Protection Agency's grants and cooperative agreements; and
( b ) Establishes Environmental Protection Agency policies and procedures for compliance with the Act that are the same as those of other Federal agencies, in conformance with the requirement in 41 U.S.C. 705 for Governmentwide implementing regulations.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Lionel Gillenwater, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County, rendered November 13, 1968, convicting him of feloniously possessing and selling narcotic drugs (on several counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Judgment affirmed. No opinion. Rabin, Acting P. J., Martuseello, Latham and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur; Benjamin, J., dissents and votes to reverse the judgment and order a new trial, with the following memorandum: Defendant was charged with the sale of narcotics to an undercover police officer who had allegedly been introduced to him by one Colbert. Colbert was not called as a witness. The prosecutor made these statements during his summation: “My job as the Assistant District Attorney is to present to you the legal, admissible evidence. And it may shock you to know that is not quite as easy as it sounds. Because what may be legal, admissible evidence, may not be true today, and what may be true in the next courtroom may not be true here. I abide by His Honor’s rulings as best I can and attempt to comply with them. Unfortunately, legal, admissible evidence has nothing to do with common sense and intelligence, because you may sit there and say to yourselves: ‘ How come we didn’t hear about this and this? ’ Now, this is the normal, intelligent reaction while sitting there as a juror. I would have the same feeling if I sat there and the answer simply is, it may be something that may not be brought to your attention because it is not proper, legal, admissible evidence. * * * There is also another principle of law, if the District Attorney calls a witness to that stand and the witness uses the Fifth Amendment, and the District Attorney knows he is going to use the Fifth Amendment, that’s what they call reversible error, because all we can do is plant a seed in your mind by deliberately calling someone who is going to plead the Fifth Amendment, and it is highly improper for me to do so. And I suggest to you in this case, that’s exactly what would have happened if Willie Colbert was called as a witness. But, in any event, the testimony here, Willie Colbert is a seller of narcotics. He is not a paid informer for the Nassau County Narcotics Squad.” The first statement clearly implied that the prosecutor had proof of guilt that the Trial Judge, perhaps erroneously, was keeping from the jury; it thus was, in effect, a vouching by the prosecutor for defendant’s guilt, even if not proven, and in invitation to the jury to speculate about what that proof might be. The second statement plainly implied that Colbert was a known narcotics seller, implicated in this crime, and would have taken the Fifth Amendment if called as a witness; it thus accomplished by indirection *799exactly what the prosecutor knew he could not do directly, namely call a witness knowing he would take the Fifth Amendment. In my opinion these comments were so grossly improper -and prejudicial that they cannot be overlooked and a new trial must be had.
IV 

House Calendar No. 139 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 632 

[Report No. 109–358] 

Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to 

consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on Rules. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 17, 2005 

Mr. PUTNAM, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; 

which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

RESOLUTION 

Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with 

respect to consideration of certain resolutions reported 

from the Committee on Rules. 

1 Resolved, That the requirement of clause 6(a) of rule 

2 XIII for a two-thirds vote to consider a report from the 

3 Committee on Rules on the same day it is presented to 

4 the House is waived with respect to any resolution re5 ported on the legislative day of Sunday, December 18, 

6 2005. 
House Calendar No. 139 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 632 

[Report No. 109–358] 

RESOLUTION 

Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII 

tions reported from the Committee on Rules. with respect to consideration of certain resoluDECEMBER 17, 2005 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed
Editorial Note on Part 180
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 180 appear at 79 FR 75879, Dec. 19, 2014.

§ 180.300 What must I do before I enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier? When you enter into a covered transaction with another person at the next lower tier, you must verify that the person with whom you intend to do business is not excluded or disqualified. You do this by: ( a ) Checking SAM Exclusions; or
( b ) Collecting a certification from that person; or
( c ) Adding a clause or condition to the covered transaction with that person.
[70 FR 51865, Aug. 31, 2005, as amended at 71 FR 66432, Nov. 15, 2006]
#### TAGGART, Respondent, v. SOLVAY PROCESS CO., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

May 27, 1914.)

Action by Alba Taggart against the Solvay Process Company.

No opinion. Motion for leave to appeal to Court of Appeals denied, with $10 costs. For former decision, see 147 N. Y. Supp. 1144.
E.O. 12866 NESHAP for Area Sources: Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers; 2060-AR14

Mary Johnson to: Higgins, Cortney

Cc

:

Peter Tsirigotis, RobertJ Wayland, Jonathan Averback, Thomas Gillis, Jim Eddinger

From: Mary Johnson/RTP/USEPA/US

To: "Higgins, Cortney" <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov>

Cc: Peter Tsirigotis/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Jonathan Averback/DC/USEPA/US@

Gillis/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Jim Eddinger/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Cortney,

Attached is the NESHAP for Area Sources: Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers - Final rule; 

notice of final action on reconsideration, per your request as part of the E.O. 12866 interagency review 

process. Please let us know if you have any questions.

Thank you.

EO 12866 NESHAP for Area Sources ICI Boilers 2060-AR14_092112.docx 

Mary Johnson

Environmental Engineer

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards

Mail Code D 243-01

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

Phone: (919) 541-5025

Fax: (919) 541-5450
EXHIBIT 10.1

AMENDMENT

That certain Employment Agreement (hereinafter "Agreement") entered into on the 17th of April, 2000, by and between Longs Drug Stores
California, Inc., a California corporation (hereinafter "Company") and Steven F. McCann, an individual (hereinafter "McCann") is hereby amended on this 22nd of May, 2002, as follows:





Other
than as herein amended the parties hereby reaffirm all other provisions of the Agreement.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed the Agreement as of the date first written above.

|Steven F. McCann,
an Individual |                     | LONGS DRUG STORES CALIFORNIA, INC.
a California Corporation
|------------------------------- | ------------------- | -----------------------------------------------------------
|By                              | /s/STEVEN F. MCCANN |                                                            
|                                |                     |                                                            
|                                |                     |                                                            
|                                |                     |                                                            
|                                |                     |                                                            
|                                |                     |                                                            

---

QuickLinks
(June 12, 1970)

#### In the Matter of Paul A. Fino, Jr., Respondent, v. James M. Power et al., Constituting the Board of Elections of the City of New York, Respondents, and Andrew P. Mantovani, Appellant.

Order entered June 8, 1970 unanimously affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. No opinion. Concur — Stevens, P. J., Eager, McGivern, Nunez and McNally, JJ.
223 So.2d 866

#### Ethel B. CARTWRIGHT v. CHRYSLER CORPORATION et al.

No. 49787.

June 27, 1969.

In re: Nelson Dodge, Inc., and Chrysler Corporation applying for certiorari, or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Calcasieu. 219 So.2d 561.

It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be notified.
EXHIBIT 32 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of SITI-Sites.com, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), We, Lawrence M.
Powers, Chief Executive Officer and Toni Ann Tantillo, Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report
fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. /s/ Lawrence
  M. PowersLawrence M.
  PowersChief
  Executive Officer  /s/ Toni Ann
  TantilloToni Ann
  TantilloChief
  Financial OfficerFebruary 14,
  2006 17
#### JONES et al., Respondents, v. LEHIGH VALLEY R. CO., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

May 27, 1914.)

Action by Herbert E. Jones and others against the Lehigh Valley Railroad Company.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment of Special Term and judgment of Buffalo City Court reversed, and a new trial granted in the Buffalo City Court, with costs in all courts to appellant to abide event. New trial to be had on the 10th day of June, 1914, at 10 a. m. Held, that the plaintiff failed to prove that the grape fruit was in good condition when received by defendant for shipment over its railroad, or that the damaged condition of the fruit when received by the consignee at Buffalo was due to any neglect on the part of the defendant.
#### § 1532.1230 How will the EPA debarring official notify me of the reinstatement decision?

The EPA debarring official will notify you of the reinstatement decision in writing, using the same methods for communicating debarment or suspension action notices under 2 CFR 180.615.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          66,658
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             720
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  1,961,735
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                      2,358,530
<ALLOWANCE>                                     69,994
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,146,516
<DEPOSITS>                                   2,221,061
<SHORT-TERM>                                   798,271
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            824,269
<LONG-TERM>                                    874,274
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        26,597
<OTHER-SE>                                     354,892
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               5,146,516
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 73,601
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               24,899
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 2,389
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               100,889
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              28,813
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              49,254
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           51,635
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   11,945
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               (200)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 56,855
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 38,616
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      19,841
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    158
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    19,999
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.75
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.75
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                   10.03
<LOANS-NON>                                      9,240
<LOANS-PAST>                                     2,993
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                 9,554
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                64,217
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    9,016
<RECOVERIES>                                     2,848
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               69,994
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            69,994
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
From: Giedrius Ambrozaitis

Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2014 3:09 PM

To: Moulis, Charles

Subject: RE: Potential Revisions for DEF Replenishment Regulations

Chuck -

Sorry for not getting back to you as I promised yesterday. We have 

reviewed the proposed revisions and have no comments to add nor issues 

with going ahead with them. Thanks again for sharing them with us.

Regards,

Giedrius

Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers

________________________________________

From: Moulis, Charles 

Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2014 5:40 PM

To: Giedrius Ambrozaitis

Subject: RE: Potential Revisions for DEF Replenishment Regulations

Tuesday will work.

-----Original Message-----

From: Giedrius Ambrozaitis [mailto:gambrozaitis@autoalliance.org]

Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2014 5:35 PM

To: Moulis, Charles

Subject: Re: Potential Revisions for DEF Replenishment Regulations

Chuck -

Thank you again for sharing these potential revisions. If its still 

acceptable, I'll send you some feedback by Tuesday next week.

Thanks,

Giedrius

Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers
### Scenarios for historic San Francisco Bay Region earthquakes

By: W. H. Bakun

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr98785

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.