alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7201 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7201

    To amend title 35, United States Code, to include the exclusive 
economic zone as part of the United States for patent infringement, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 29, 2018

Mr. Smith of Texas (for himself, Mr. Olson, Mr. Sensenbrenner, Mr. Poe 
  of Texas, Mr. Ratcliffe, Mr. Gene Green of Texas, and Mr. Cuellar) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend title 35, United States Code, to include the exclusive 
economic zone as part of the United States for patent infringement, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PATENT INFRINGEMENT IN EXCLUSIVE ECONOMIC ZONE OF THE UNITED 
              STATES.

    (a) Amendment.--Chapter 10 of title 35, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following new section:
``Sec. 106. Inventions in the exclusive economic zone
    ``Any act occurring on or below the waters of the exclusive 
economic zone of the United States established by Presidential 
Proclamation 5030 of March 10, 1983 (16 U.S.C. 1453 note), including 
activity on the seabed of such zone, that is related to the economic 
exploitation of, or exploration for, natural resources or marine 
scientific research shall be considered an act occurring within the 
United States for the purposes of section 271.''.
    (b) Technical and Conforming Amendment.--The table of sections for 
chapter 10 of title 35, United States Code, is amended by adding at the 
end the following new item:

        ``106. Inventions in the exclusive economic zone.''.
                                 <all>
```
March 14, 2014 

Memorandum 

Subject: Summary of Conference Call with Alcoa Intalco Representatives 

From: David Green, RTI 

To: David Putney, EPA/OAQPS 

I. Purpose

 The purpose of the call was to discuss results of previous testing of secondary potroom 

emissions of polycyclic organic matter (POM) and the schedule and procedures for future 

testing. 

II. Date and Time 

 The call was held March 13, 2014 between 11:00 a. m. and 11:30 a.m. 

III. Attendees

 David Putney, EPA/OAQPS 

 Gerri Garwood, EPA/OAQPS 

 David Green, RTI 

 Mike Palazzolo, Alcoa 

 Patricia Bliskis, Alcoa 

 Catherine Mitchell, Alcoa 

IV. Summary

 

 Alcoa plans to schedule testing of wet scrubber controlled roof vent polycyclic organic 

matter emissions between April 14 and April 25, 2014 and anticipates having preliminary results 

by May 9, 2014. Testing would consist of three runs of 8 to 12 hour duration. Alcoa 

representatives believe that stationary testing with sampling at a single location where the gas 

velocity is equal to the average velocity across the scrubber area would produce equivalent 

results to transverse sampling. Transverse sampling requires additional labor and requires a 

person on the roof for eight to twelve hours. Stationary sampling can be controlled by a person 

at a lower level. Alcoa requested confirmation that results of stationary sampling would be 

acceptable for EPA’s use in setting POM standards. EPA representatives agreed to consider this 

and advise Alcoa as soon as possible. Alcoa representatives also agreed to send the results of a 

series of tests conducted in September, 2013 that had not been previously submitted because of 

quality assurance problems associated with isokinetic sampling.
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the annual report of Cavico Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ha Quang Bui, Chief Executive
Officer and Financial Officer, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
that:





(1) This
report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/
      Ha Quang BuiHa
      Quang Bui
                          Chief
      Executive OfficerDate:  December
      14,
2009
#### GEORGE E. VAN VORST, Inc., Appellant, v. STRONG, Respondent, et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

June 26, 1914.)

Action by George E. Van Vorst, Incorporated, against James S. Strong, impleaded with others.

W. Bigelow, of New York City, for appellant.

R. H. Ernest, of New York City, for respondent.

No opinion. Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Order filed.
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. AP -76,803

EX P ARTE WILL IAM THOMAS WATTS, Ap plicant

ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. DIS-08-01654 IN THE 119TH DISTRICT COURT

F ROM CONCHO COUNTY

Per curiam . O P I N I O N Pursuant to the provisi o n s o f Ar t icle 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedur e, the cler k of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habea s corpus. Ex parte Y oung , 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of ag gravated sexual assault and sentenc ed to fifty year s’ imprisonment. The Third Court of Appea ls dismiss ed his appea l. W atts v. State , No. 03-08-00725- CR (Tex. App.–Austi n 2009, no pet.). Applicant contends th at h e wa s denied his right to appea l. The trial court found that Ap p l i cant was deprive d of his right to appea l through no fault of his own. Ex parte Ril ey , 1 9 3 S.W .3d 900, 902 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). We find that Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of-time appeal of the j udgment of c o n v i ct i o n i n cause number DI S-08-01654 from the2

119th District Court of Concho County

. Applicant is order ed returne d to that time at which he may g ive a written notice of appea l so that he may then, with the aid o f co un s el, obtain a meaning ful appea l. Within ten day s of the issuance of t h i s o p inion, the trial court shall deter mine whether Applicant is indige nt. I f Applicant is indige nt and wishes to be repr esente d by counsel, the trial court shall immediately appoint an attorney to repr esent Applicant on direc t appea l. All time limit s shall be cal cu l ated as i f the sentence had been imposed on the date on which the mandate of this Court issues. We hold that, should Applicant desire to prosec ute an appea l, he must take aff irmative steps to file a written notice of appea l in the trial court within 30 d ay s afte r the mandate of this Court issues. Copies of th is o pinion shall be sent to the Texas Depa rtment of Criminal J ustice-Corr ectional Institut ions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.

Deliver ed: May

23, 2012 Do not publish
###### Editorial Note on Part 9

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 9 appear at 82 FR 52825, Nov. 15, 2017.

#### § 9.3 Definitions.

As used in this part:

*Commission* means the Commission of five members or a quorum thereof sitting as a body, as provided by section 201 of the Energy Reorganization Act of 1974.

*Government agency* means any executive department, military department, Government corporation, Government-controlled corporation, or other establishment in the executive branch of the Government (including the Executive Office of the President), or any independent regulatory agency.

*NRC* means the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, established by the Energy Reorganization Act of 1974.

*NRC personnel* means employees, consultants, and members of advisory boards, committees, and panels of the NRC; members of boards designated by the Commission to preside at adjudicatory proceedings; and officers or employees of Government agencies, including military personnel, assigned to duty at the NRC.

*Working days* mean Monday through Friday, except legal holidays.

[52 FR 49355, Dec. 31, 1987]
Exhibit
32



Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

(Adopted
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)



Securities
and Exchange Commission

100
F Street, N.E.

Washington,
D.C. 20549



In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Gulf Coast Ultra Deep Royalty Trust (the “Trust”) for the year ended December
31, 2023, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, not in
its individual capacity but solely as the trustee of the Trust, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant
to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of its knowledge:



(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition, distributable income and
changes in trust corpus of the Trust.



Date:
March 28, 2024



| | /s/
    Sarah C. Newell                              
| | -----------------------------------------------------
| | Sarah
    C. Newell                                  
| | Vice
    President                                   
| | The
    Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., 
| | as
    Trustee of Gulf Coast Ultra Deep Royalty Trust



The
above certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) and is not being filed
as part of the Form 10-K or as a separate disclosure document.
§ 850.11 General CBDPP requirements. ( a ) The CBDPP must specify the existing and planned operational tasks that are within the scope of the CBDPP. The CBDPP must augment and, to the extent feasible, be integrated into the existing worker protection programs that cover activities at the facility.
( b ) The detail, scope, and content of the CBDPP must be commensurate with the hazard of the activities performed, but in all cases the CBDPP must: ( 1 ) Include formal plans and measures for maintaining exposures to beryllium at or below the permissible exposure level prescribed in § 850.22;
( 2 ) Satisfy each requirement in subpart C of this part;
( 3 ) Contain provisions for: ( i ) Minimizing the number of workers exposed and potentially exposed to beryllium;
( ii ) Minimizing the number of opportunities for workers to be exposed to beryllium;
( iii ) Minimizing the disability and lost work time of workers due to chronic beryllium disease, beryllium sensitization and associated medical care; and
( iv ) Setting specific exposure reduction and minimization goals that are appropriate for the beryllium activities covered by the CBDPP to further reduce exposure below the permissible exposure limit prescribed in § 850.22.
#### § 54.7 Written communications.

All applications, correspondence, reports, and other written communications shall be filed in accordance with applicable portions of 10 CFR 50.4.
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 92 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to increase the maximum age for 

children eligible for medical care under the CHAMPVA program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 3, 2017 

Ms. BROWNLEY of California (for herself and Mr. WALZ) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to increase the 

maximum age for children eligible for medical care under 

the CHAMPVA program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘CHAMPVA Children’s 

5 Protection Act of 2017’’. 

6 SEC. 2. INCREASE OF MAXIMUM AGE FOR CHILDREN ELIGI7 BLE FOR MEDICAL CARE UNDER CHAMPVA 

8 PROGRAM. 

9 (a) INCREASE.—Section 1781(c) of title 38, United 

10 States Code, is amended— 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 92 IH

1 (1) by striking ‘‘twenty-three’’ and inserting 

2 ‘‘twenty-six’’; and 

3 (2) by striking ‘‘twenty-third birthday’’ and in4 serting ‘‘twenty-sixth birthday’’. 

5 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

6 subsection (a) shall apply with respect to medical care pro7 vided on or after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 14, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 04-41236

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

 

TIMOTHY JEROME LUKE, 

 Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 2:04-CR-357-ALL

--------------------

Before KING, Chief Judge, and HIGGINBOTHAM and SMITH, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Counsel appointed to represent Timothy Jerome Luke has

requested leave to withdraw from this appeal and has filed a

brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). 

Our independent review of the brief, Luke’s response, and the

record discloses no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Counsel’s

motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from

further responsibilities, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5TH

CIR. R. 42.2.
PGI 225.871-4 Statutory waivers.       Forward any request for waiver under a cooperative project to the Deputy Secretary of Defense, through the Principal Director,Defense Pricing and Contracting. The waiver request shall include a draft Determination and Findings for signature by the Deputy Secretary of Defense establishing that the waiver is necessary to significantly further NATO standardization, rationalization, and interoperability.    **Parent topic:** PGI 225.871 North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) cooperative projects.
Amendments to Global Pension Plan, effective 12/18/2009



 Exhibit 10.JJ(6) 
 AMENDMENTS TO THE 
 GLOBAL PENSION PLAN

 Pursuant to Section 6.4 of the Global Pension Plan (“Plan”), which provides that the Plan may be amended
in whole or in part at any time by Alcoa, the Plan is revised as follows: 
  

	1.	The following new Article VII – Claims and Appeals is added: 

 ARTICLE VII – CLAIMS AND APPEALS 
 7.1 If a claim
by a Participant or spouse is denied in whole or in part, the Participant or spouse, or their representative will receive written notice from the Director. This notice will include the reasons for denial, the specific Plan provision involved, an
explanation of how claims are reviewed, the procedure for requesting a review of the denied claim, and a description of the information that must be submitted with the appeal. The Participant or spouse, or their representative, may file a written
appeal for review of a denied claim to the Plan. The process and the time frames for the determination of claims and appeals are as follows: 
 (a) The Director reviews initial claim and makes determination within 90 days of the date the claim is received. 
 (b) The Director may extend the above 90-day period an additional 90 days if required due to special circumstances beyond control of Director. 
 (c) The Participant or spouse, or their representative, may submit an appeal of a denied claim within 60 days of receipt of the denial.

 (d) The Director reviews and makes a determination on the appeal within 60 days of the date the appeal was received.

 (e) The Director may extend the above 60-day period an additional 60 days if required by special circumstances beyond the
control of the Director. 
 7.2 In the case where the Director requires an extension of the period to provide a determination on
an initial claim or an appeal, the plan will notify the Participant or spouse, or their representative, prior to the expiration of the initial determination period. The notification will describe the circumstances requiring the extension and the
date a determination is expected to be made. If additional information is required from the Participant or spouse, the determination period








 
will be suspended until the earlier of i) the date the information is received by the Director or ii) 45 days from the date the information was requested. 
 7.3 Participants or spouses, or their representative, who having received an adverse appeal determination and thereby exhausted the remedies
provided under the Plan, proceed to file suit in state or federal court, must file such suit within 180 days from the date of the adverse appeal determination notice. 
  

	2.	In all other respects the Plan is ratified and confirmed.
**Exhibit
      32.1**





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Patient Safety Technologies, Inc. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2005 as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
      I, Milton “Todd” Ault, III, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





Date: September
              13, 2005
            By:
            /s/ Milton
              "Todd" Ault, IIIMilton
                “Todd” Ault, III
              Chief
                Executive Officer
223 So.2d 870

#### Joseph BOULET and Augustin E. Boulet v. Beulah MIGUEZ, wife of Eddie FRUGGE, and Howard Miguez.

No. 49913.

June 27, 1969.

In re: Augustin E. Boulet applying for, certiorari or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Acadia. 221 So.2d 602.

Application denied. The judgment complained of is correct.
§ 1108.245 Local government. *Local government* means any unit of government within a State, including a: ( a ) County;
( b ) Borough;
( c ) Municipality;
( d ) City;
( e ) Town;
( f ) Township;
( g ) Parish;
( h ) Local public authority, including any public housing agency under the United States Housing Act of 1937;
( i ) Special district;
( j ) School district;
( k ) Intrastate district;
( l ) Council of governments, whether or not incorporated as a nonprofit corporation under State law; and
( m ) Any other agency or instrumentality of a multi-, regional, or intra-state or local government.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000764579
<NAME> CAS MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           2,002,387
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      828,218
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                        889,478
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,886,151
<PP&E>                                           3,128,696
<DEPRECIATION>                                     758,966
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   6,258,781
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              541,062
<BONDS>                                                  0
<COMMON>                                            37,387
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,705,347
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     6,258,781
<SALES>                                          1,715,948
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,796,593
<CGS>                                              774,300
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      733,540
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   127,674
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              (   1,239)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    159,840
<INCOME-TAX>                                        59,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                100,840
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                       100,840
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          .01
        

</TABLE>
§ 850.33 Beryllium emergencies. ( a ) The responsible employer must comply with 29 CFR 1910.120(l) for handling beryllium emergencies related to decontamination and decommissioning operations.
( b ) The responsible employer must comply with 29 CFR 1910.120(q) for handling beryllium emergencies related to all other operations.
#### § 602.3 Definitions.

In addition to the definitions provided in 2 CFR part 200 and 2 CFR part 910, the following definitions are provided for purposes of this part:

*Conference and communication activities* means scientific or technical conferences, symposia, workshops, seminars, public meetings, publications, video or slide shows, and other presentations for the purpose of communicating or exchanging information or views pertinent to DOE.

*DOE* means the United States Department of Energy.

*Education/Training* means support for education or related activities for an individual or organization that will enhance educational levels and skills, in particular, scientific or technical areas of interest to DOE.

*Epidemiology and Other Health Studies* means research pertaining to potential health effects resulting from DOE or predecessor agency operations or from any aspect of energy production, transmission, or use (including electromagnetic fields) in the United States and abroad. Related systems or activities to enhance these areas, as well as other program areas that may be described by notice published in the Federal Register, are also included.

*Principal investigator* means the scientist or other individual designated by the recipient to direct the project.

*Research* means basic and applied research and that part of development not related to the development of specific systems or products. The primary aim of research is scientific study and experimentation directed toward advancing the state of the art or increasing knowledge or understanding rather than focusing on a specific system or product.

[60 FR 5841, Jan. 31, 1995, as amended at 79 FR 76046, Dec. 19, 2014]