alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 01-2473

___________ Byther Mae Williams; Richard V. Fink, * * Appellants, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Western District of Missouri. Regency Financial Corp., * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: September 27, 2001 Filed: November 16, 2001

___________ Before WOLLMAN, Chief Judge, HANSEN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Byther Mae Williams purports to appeal an adverse district court decision in her bankruptcy proceeding against Regency Financial Corp. Regency contends the appeal is untimely, and requests dismissal. Upon careful review of the record, we observe that the district court never entered a separate judgment, as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58. Accordingly, the appeal is premature, we are without appellate jurisdiction, and we dismiss without prejudice to the taking of an appeal once the district court enters judgment on a separate document. See Moore v. St. Louis Music Supply Co. , 526 F.2d 801, 802 (8th Cir. 1975).-2- A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
**EXHIBIT      32 **

**CERTIFICATIONS      **

**Pursuant      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 **

|                                   |                                                 |
|----------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------|
| Date:                May 10, 2006      | /s/                Reginald M. Fountain, Jr.         |
|                                   | Reginald                M. Fountain, Jr.             |
|                                   | President                and Chief Executive Officer |
|                                   |                                                 |
|                                   |                                                 |
| Date: May                10, 2006 | /s/                Irving L. Smith                   |
|                                   | Irving                L. Smith                       |
|                                   | Chief                Financial Officer               |

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                       2,568,226
<SECURITIES>                                 7,534,693
<RECEIVABLES>                                   56,488
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,624,714
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,194,329
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          144,023
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                  10,050,306
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,194,329
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               587,499
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               218,942
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                368,557
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            368,557
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   368,557
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
5608.003 Use of other Government supply

sources.

(Revised January 2018)

Agencies shall satisfy requirements for the following supplies or services from or through specified

sources, as applicable:

(f) SOCOM Wide Mission Support (SWMS) contract:

In accordance with the Chief of Staff memo, Obtaining Acquisition Support for Service Contract

Requirements dated December 1, 2015, all Headquarters (HQ) USSOCOM services contract

requirements (excluding IT support) are required to use the SWMS contract.

(g) Removed (January 2018).

(h) SOF Information Enterprise (SIE) IT Services, Hardware and Software Purchasing:

Use of Enterprise Operations and Maintenance (EO&M) contract (services) and GSA Alliant GWACs

(Services) and NASA SEWP (Hardware/Software) are highly encouraged but not mandatory.

Parent topic: Part 5608 - REQUIRED SOURCES OF SUPPLIES AND SERVICES
§ 810.10 Revocation, suspension, or modification of authorization. The Secretary may revoke, suspend, or modify a general or specific authorization: ( a ) For any material false statement in an application for specific authorization or in any additional information submitted in its support;
( b ) For failing to provide a report or for any material false statement in a report submitted pursuant to § 810.12;
( c ) If any authorization governed by this part is subsequently determined by the Secretary to be inimical to the interest of the United States or otherwise no longer meets the legal criteria for approval; or
( d ) Pursuant to section 129 of the Atomic Energy Act.
#### § 1329.400 What method do I use as an agency awarding official to obtain a recipient's agreement to comply with the OMB guidance?

To obtain a recipient's agreement to comply with applicable requirements in the OMB guidance at 2 CFR part 182, you must include the following term or condition in the award: Drug-free workplace. You as the recipient must comply with drug-free workplace requirements in Subpart B (or Subpart C, if the recipient is an individual) of 2 CFR part 1329, which adopts the Govemmentwide implementation (2 CFR part 182) of sec. 5152-5158 of the Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1988 (Pub. L. 100-690, Title V, Subtitle D; 41 U.S.C. 701-707).
#### § 830.120 Scope.

This subpart establishes quality assurance requirements for contractors conducting activities, including providing items or services that affect, or may affect, nuclear safety of DOE nuclear facilities.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 247 (Monday, December 27, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 81247]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-32400]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Docket ID DOD-2010-OS-0168]


Privacy Act of 1974; System of Records

AGENCY: Defense Intelligence Agency, DoD.

ACTION: Notice to delete a system of records.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Defense Intelligence Agency proposes to delete a system of 
records notice in its existing inventory of records systems subject to 
the Privacy Act of 1974, (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended.

DATES: This proposed action will be effective without further notice on 
January 26, 2011 unless comments are received which result in a 
contrary determination.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by dock number and/RIN 
number and title, by any of the following methods:
    <bullet> Federal Rulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. 
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
    <bullet> Mail: Federal Docket Management System Office, Room 3C843, 
1160 Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-1160.
    Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name 
and docket number or Regulatory Information Number (RIN) for this 
Federal Register document. The general policy for comments and other 
submissions from members of the public is to make these submissions 
available for public viewing on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov as they are received without change, including any 
personal identifiers or contact information.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: DIA Privacy Act Coordinator, Records 
Management Section, 200 MacDill Blvd., Washington, DC 20340, or Ms. 
Theresa Lowery at (202) 231-1193.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Defense Intelligence Agency systems of 
records notices subject to the Privacy Act of 1974, (5 U.S.C. 552a), as 
amended, have been published in the Federal Register and are available 
from the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT address above.
    The specific changes to the record system being amended are set 
forth below followed by the notice, as amended, published in its 
entirety. The proposed amendment is not within the purview of 
subsection (r) of the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended, 
which requires the submission of new or altered systems reports.

    Dated: December 14, 2010.
Morgan F. Park,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
Deletions:

DCIFA 01

System name:
    CIFA Operational and Analytical Records (February 25, 2005, 70 FR 
9281).
    Reason: The records collected and maintained in this system are 
covered under Ldia 10-0002, Intelligence/Counterintelligence/Operation 
Record System (June 15, 2010, 75 FR 33791).

[FR Doc. 2010-32400 Filed 12-23-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
§ 820.5 Service. ( a ) *General rule.* Any document filed with the Docketing Clerk must be served on the addressee of the document and shall not be considered filed until service is complete and unless accompanied by proof of service; provided that the filing with the Docketing Clerk of any document addressed to the DOE Official shall be considered service on the DOE Official.
( b ) *Service in an Enforcement Adjudication.* Any document filed in an enforcement adjudication must be served on all other participants in the adjudication.
( c ) *Who may be served.* Any paper required to be served upon a person shall be served upon him or upon the representative designated by him or by law to receive service of papers. When an attorney has entered an appearance on behalf of a person, service must be made upon the attorney of record.
( d ) *How service may be made.* Service may be made by personal delivery, by first class, certified or registered mail or as otherwise authorized or required by the DOE Official. The DOE Official may require service by express mail.
( e ) *When service is complete.* Service upon a person is complete: ( 1 ) By personal delivery, on handing the paper to the individual, or leaving it at his office with his clerk or other person in charge or, if there is no one in charge, leaving it in a conspicuous place therein or, if the office is closed or the person to be served has no office, leaving it at his usual place of residence with some person of suitable age and discretion then residing there;
( 2 ) By mail, on deposit in the United States mail, properly stamped and addressed; or
( 3 ) By any other means authorized or required by the DOE Official.
( f ) *Proof of service.* Proof of service, stating the name and address of the person on whom served and the manner and date of service, shall be shown for each document filed, and may be made by: ( 1 ) Written acknowledgement of the person served or his counsel;
( 2 ) The certificate of counsel if he has made the service;
( 3 ) The affidavit of the person making the service; or
( 4 ) Any other means authorized or required by the DOE Official.
( g ) *Deemed service.* If a document is deemed filed under this part, then the service requirements shall be deemed satisfied when the document is deemed filed.
Exhibit 34.3a



LOGO

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors and shareholders of CoreLogic, Inc.:

We have examined managements assertion, included in the accompanying Report on Assessment of Compliance, that CoreLogic Tax Services, LLC (the
Company), an indirect subsidiary of CoreLogic, Inc. complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commissions Regulation AB for all loans for residential and commercial mortgage loan
outsourcing customers for which the Company served as the residential and commercial tax service provider (the Platform), as of December 31, 2015 and for the year then ended, only including 1122(d)(1)(iv), 1122(d)(2)(ii), 1122(d)(2)(v),
1122(d)(2)(vi), 1122(d)(2)(vii), 1122(d)(4)(xi), 1122(d)(4)(xii) and 1122(d)(4)(xiii), which the Company has determined are applicable to the servicing activities performed by it with respect to the Platform. Management is responsible for the
Companys compliance with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on managements assertion based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly,
included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Companys compliance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of
selected servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company performed those selected activities in compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our procedures were limited to the selected servicing activities
performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to detect noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurred prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts
calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Companys compliance with
the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, managements assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of
and for the year ended December 31, 2015 for all loans for residential and commercial mortgage loan outsourcing customers for which the Company served as the residential and commercial tax service provider is fairly stated, in all material respects.

February 4, 2016

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, 2001 Ross Avenue, Suite 1800, Dallas, Texas 75201

T: (214) 999-1400, F: (214) 754-7991, www.pwc.com/us
<!Congresg of tbe m1n{teb ~tate5

.' mmIaulJin~Qn. m'!t 20510

July 16,20]3

Brooke Chapman

Office of Aviation Analysis

1200 New Jersey Ave, SE

Washington DC 20590 .

Dear Associate Director Chapman:

.';... ,-'•. "JT\ ,'; I JTI'ENT OF

.;" :S?ORTATIO;J

'",,11'\[. ""-',. OPERATIC ~i0."

l:'lJ AUGIb A ~: 24

-~-- - ... _,--- -,~--_.-- ------_._--~-~_._..-.

1tis Withgreat enthusiasm that we offer our support to.the Small Community Air Servite,Developit)ent

(SCASD) grant application of the Duluth Airport Authority and Visit Duluth. Duluth's SCASD

application has broad support in the local community evident by the public and private money committed

as a local match.

Duluth is a model candidate for the SCASD program due to its higher fares and limited air service

connectivity. A recent leakage study revcaled that 49% of potential passengers within a 30 mile radius 6f

Duluth choose to drive 2 Yo hours to Minneapolis due in part to higher fares and limited connectivity. The

same study also shows that 70% of Duluth's air passengers are outbound. These trends are reversible

with the assistance oftlie SCASD program.

The Duluth Airport Authority. in partnership with Visit Duluth, has developed a plan targeting travel

from Chicago to Duluth in an effort to attract leisure travelers to the Duluth area. This effort will combat

the 70% outbound passenger numbers directly bringing the percentage closer to an industry acceptable

50%. Increased passengers to Duluth will assist the airport in working Witbeach of its airline partners to

keep fares coinpetitive and provide additional frequencies. The economic.impact oftbisinv:estment.wilt

also be felt in many businesses of the rcgion as travelers stay in area hOltHs.eat in local res\iUliiihts, and

shop in many oftbe local small businesses that call Duluth home.

The airport.and the community are on the cusp of self-sustaining growth with the infusion of capital the.

SCA_S~~~gram can_~ro'yj~e.We th~nkyou will agree that Duluth's application makes a strong case.

Thank you for your considemtionoftheii appficati6n~-- ."-'- -_._-- - --_.- .•.• --------

Sincere

United States Senator United States Senator

Richard M. Nolan

Member of CongresS

".'..

...'•...•.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 33 (Friday, February 19, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 7536]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-3256]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 6897]


Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Hendrick Avercamp (1585-1634): The Little Ice Age''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236 
of October 19, 1999, as amended, and Delegation of Authority No. 257 of 
April 15, 2003 [68 FR 19875], I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``Hendrick Avercamp (1585-1634): The Little 
Ice Age,'' imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the 
United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are imported 
pursuant to loan agreements with the foreign owners or custodians. I 
also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at 
the National Gallery of Art, Washington, DC, from on or about March 21, 
2010, until on or about July 5, 2010, and at possible additional 
exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the national 
interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these Determinations be 
published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Julie Simpson, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6467). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, 
Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: February 12, 2010.
Maura M. Pally,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Professional and Cultural Exchanges, 
Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2010-3256 Filed 2-18-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
§ 900.10 Consolidated administrative docket. ( a ) DOE shall maintain a consolidated docket of: ( 1 ) All information that DOE distributes to or receives from the project proponent, relevant Federal entities, and relevant non-Federal entities related to the Integrated Interagency Pre-Application (IIP) Process, including: ( i ) The IIP initiation request, review meeting request, and close-out meeting request required by §§ 900.5, 900.8, and 900.9;
( ii ) The IIP Process final meeting summaries required by §§ 900.5, 900.8 and 900.9;
( iii ) The IIP Process final resource reports developed under § 900.6;
( iv ) The final project-specific schedule developed under §§ 900.7 and 900.8;
( v ) Other documents submitted by the project proponent as part of the IIP Process or provided to the project proponent as part of the IIP Process, including but not limited to maps, publicly available data, and other supporting documentation; and
( vi ) Communications between any relevant Federal or non-Federal entity and the project proponent regarding the IIP Process; and
( 2 ) All information assembled and used by relevant Federal entities as the basis for Federal authorizations and related reviews following completion of the IIP Process.
( b ) Federal entities should include DOE in all communications with the project proponent related to the IIP Process for the proposed electric transmission project.
( c ) DOE shall make the consolidated docket available, as appropriate, to the NEPA joint lead agency selected under § 900.11; any relevant Federal or non-Federal entity responsible for issuing an authorization for the proposed project; and any consulting parties per section 106 of the NHPA, consistent with 36 CFR part 800. DOE shall exclude or redact privileged documents, as appropriate.
( d ) Where necessary and appropriate, DOE may require a project proponent to contract with a qualified record-management consultant to compile a contemporaneous docket on behalf of all participating agencies. Any such contractor shall operate at the direction of DOE, and DOE shall retain responsibility and authority over the content of the docket.
( e ) Upon request, any member of the public will be provided materials included in the docket, excluding any materials protected as CEII or otherwise required or allowed to be withheld under the Freedom of Information Act.
#### § 960.5-2 Technical guidelines.

The technical guidelines in this subpart set forth qualifying, favorable, potentially adverse, and, in seven guidelines, disqualifying conditions for the characteristics, processes, and events that influence the suitability of a site relative to the preclosure system guidelines. These conditions are separated into three main groups: Preclosure radiological safety; environment, socioeconomics, and transportation; and ease and cost of siting, construction, operation, and closure. The first group includes conditions on population density and distribution, site ownership and control, meteorology, and offsite installations and operations. The second group includes conditions related to environmental quality and socioeconomic impacts in areas potentially affected by a repository and to the transportation of waste to a repository site. The third group includes conditions on the surface characteristics of the site, the characteristics of the host rock and surrounding strata, hydrology, and tectonics. The individual technical guidelines within each group, as well as the favorable conditions and the potentially adverse conditions under each guideline, are not listed in any assumed order of importance. The technical guidelines that follow establish conditions that shall be considered in determining compliance with the qualifying conditions of the preclosure system guidelines. For each technical guideline, an evaluation of qualification or disqualification shall be made in accordance with the requirements specified in subpart B.