alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 250 (Thursday, December 30, 2010)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 82279]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-32466]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 73

[DA 10-2280]


Radio Broadcasting Services; Various Locations

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commission amends the Table of FM Allotments to unreserved 
FM allotments that are reserved for noncommercial educational (NCE) use 
for Channel *272A at Homer, Louisiana, and Channel *260A at Fountain 
Green, Utah.

DATES: Effective December 30, 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rolanda F. Smith, Media Bureau, (202) 
418-2180.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a summary of the Commission's Report 
and Order, adopted December 1, 2010, and released December 3, 2010. 
These amendments are necessary to reflect that Channel 272A at Homer, 
Louisiana, and Channel 260A at Fountain Green, Utah are no longer 
reserved for NCE use. The full text of this Commission decision is 
available for inspection and copying during regular business hours at 
the FCC Reference Information Center, Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW., 
Room CY-A257, Washington, DC 20554. The complete text of this decision 
may also be purchased from the Commission's duplicating contractor, 
Best Copy and Printing, Inc., 445 12th Street, SW., Room CY-B402, 
Washington, DC 20554, telephone 1-800-378-3160 or http://www.BCPIWEB.com. The Commission will not send a copy of the Report & 
Order in this proceeding pursuant to the Congressional Review Act, see 
5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A), because the adopted rules are rules of 
particular applicability.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 73

    Radio, Radio broadcasting.

0
As stated in the preamble, the Federal Communications Commission amends 
47 CFR part 73 as follows:

PART 73--RADIO BROADCASTING SERVICES

0
1. The authority citation for part 73 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  47 U.S.C. 154, 303, 334, 336.


Sec.  73.202  [Amended]

0
2. Section 73.202(b), the Table of FM Allotments, is amended as 
follows:
0
a. Under Louisiana, the table is amended by removing Channel *272A and 
by adding Channel 272A at Homer.
0
b. Under Utah, the table is amended by removing Channel *260A and by 
adding Channel 260A at Fountain Green.

Federal Communications Commission.
John A. Karousos,
Assistant Chief, Audio Division, Media Bureau.
[FR Doc. 2010-32466 Filed 12-29-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
Bureau of Labor Statistics

**Series Id: Series title:**  **Labor force status: Type of data:**  **Age: Years:**  **Year Qtr1**  **Qtr2 Qtr3**  **Qtr4 Annual**  **2011** 271 Unemployed Number in thousands 65 to 69 years 2011 to 2011 

### Labor Force Statistics from the Current Population Survey **Original Data Value** LNU03024938Q **Not Seasonally Adjusted** (Unadj) Unemployment Level - 65-69 yrs.

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics Generated on: May 16, 2011 (02:10:03 PM)
EXHIBIT 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of Bigfoot Project Investments Inc.  (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended July 31, 2015, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Tom Biscardi, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date: November 23, 2015  /s/ Tom Biscardi Tom Biscardi Principal Executive Officer
###### Editorial Note on Part 61

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 61 appear at 80 FR 74980, Dec. 1, 2015, and at 81 FR 86909, Dec. 2, 2016.

#### § 61.71 State and Tribal government consultation.

Upon request of a State or tribal governing body, the Director shall make available Commission staff to discuss with representatives of the State or tribal governing body information submitted by the applicant, applicable Commission regulations, licensing procedures, potential schedules, and the type and scope of State activities in the license review permitted by law. In addition, staff shall be made available to consult and cooperate with the State or tribal governing body in developing proposals for participation in the license review.
! 	


	





	

 

 








	










"




#
		




		





$




	



%
"

&	
		


	


%
"&	


	

'(






#



	




 


)
*


 







+

,-


	+


	

,-




+


	

,-


+


		

,-


+





%
"&	

		
.



		



/

%
"&		

		







 	





%
"&	









		









	







		

	

	


	


 		







	
 







	


	





		
		

		


				





)	

	

*



 	





 




+

,!				








 


	


,0		





		



.
	







,				













	




			



	

	





+

,-



,-


,1
	




,$


			

	



,2
.

,3










		


	
	

	

		

		


%
"&	


			


		

4



		









!				

	 %
"&	

	
 



	








		

		


		


	
	

			













		

		













		
	

	

		

%
"&	5

				


+

,!






	


	





















,0	
.






	
	

,0




			












			


	


,-

-	












	



,%

)

			
*







	














,2
	


			

	

,

	








 	

		



		

%
"

&	5		

		#


	




	
 -	


	

	




		


#
	

	








	

 

 




6

#

		7		


 

		

-
		






				


	

	


	



	


















	



	







	




	


		

 $












	
	




	
	














	



		



 




	








	



	








		


		
	








	
	
	

 

	

	


	 





	

	







	


 




		





 











	


	
	
				
	

 	



!	
		
"
#
$



%



#	
&
'	

(




%
	&
'	

(


%
	&
)#



*


*
#	&


+
,-./0,012




+

(
	

%
	
"


	
		


			

		




 !"#"

$$	%&#' (!"#"


	)!# *+#,(,#',

)!# *+#,(,-& 

.(	
/	
0

111	
0
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 242 (Friday, December 17, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 78998]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-31798]



[[Page 78998]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Disease, Disability, and Injury Prevention and Control Special 
Emphasis Panel (SEP): Addressing Global TB Prevention and Control in 
all Populations and Strengthening Health Facilities, Laboratories, 
Prisons and Other Community Settings, Funding Opportunity Announcement 
(FOA) PS11-002; and Addressing TB Control and Lung Health Activities 
through the Vietnam National Lung Hospital/National TB Program (NLH/
NTP), FOA PS11-004, Initial Review

    In accordance with Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention (CDC) announces the aforementioned meeting:

Time and Date:  12 p.m.--2 p.m., March 10, 2011 (Closed).

Place:  Teleconference.

Status:  The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with 
provisions set forth in Section 552b(c) (4) and (6), Title 5 U.S.C., 
and the Determination of the Director, Management Analysis and Services 
Office, CDC, pursuant to Public Law 92-463.

Matters To Be Discussed:  The meeting will include the initial review, 
discussion, and evaluation of applications received in response to 
``Addressing Global TB Prevention and Control in all Populations and 
Strengthening Health Facilities, Laboratories, Prisons And Other 
Community Settings, FOA PS11-002'' and ``Addressing TB Control and Lung 
Health Activities through the Vietnam National Lung Hospital/National 
TB Program (NLH/NTP), FOA PS11-004, initial review.''

Contact Person for More Information:  Gregory Anderson, M.S., M.P.H., 
Scientific Review Officer, CDC, 1600 Clifton Road, NE., Mailstop E60, 
Atlanta, Georgia 30333, Telephone: (404) 498-2293.
    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been 
delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices pertaining to 
announcements of meetings and other committee management activities, 
for both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and the Agency 
for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.

    Dated: December 13, 2010.
Elaine L. Baker,
Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2010-31798 Filed 12-16-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
Subpart 2803.1 - Safeguards    **Parent topic:** PART 2803 - IMPROPER BUSINESS PRACTICES AND PERSONAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST2803.101 Standards of conduct.2803.101-3 Agency regulations.       The DOJ regulations governing Standards of Conduct are contained in 5 CFR part 2635.2803.104 Procurement integrity.2803.104-7 Violations or possible violations.       (a) Upon receipt of information regarding a violation or possible violation of 41 U.S.C. 2102, 2103, or 2104, the contracting officer must make the determination required by FAR 3.104-7(a) and follow the procedures prescribed therein.          (1) Make the determination required by FAR 3.104-7(a) and follow the procedures prescribed therein.          (2) [Reserved].          (b) The individual referenced in FAR 3.104-7(a)          (1)  			is the BPC.          (c) The HCA or designee must follow the criteria contained in FAR 3.104-7(g) when delegating authority under this subpart.          (d) The HCA or designee shall refer information regarding actual or possible violations of section 41 U.S.C. 2102, 2103, or 2014 to the OIG or other office designated in Attorney General Order 1931-94.          (e) If the HCA or designee, after receiving information relating to a violation, or possible violation, determines that award or extension of a contract potentially affected by the violation is justified by urgent and compelling circumstances, or is otherwise in the interest of the Government, then the HCA may authorize the contracting officer to award or extend the contract after notification to the OIG or other office designated in Attorney General Order 1931-94.          (f) The HCA will advise the contracting officer as to the action to be taken. Criminal and civil penalties, and administrative remedies, may apply to conduct that violates 41 U.S.C. chapter 21, see FAR 3.104-8.          (g) The contracting officer shall advise the SPE in writing of all allegations of violations. The contracting officer must describe the alleged violation as well as actions taken.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

JEVON GIBSON, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D16-4383

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

________________________________ )

Opinion filed April 27, 2018. 

Appeal from the Circuit Court for 

Charlotte County; John L. Burns, 

Acting Circuit Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, 

and Kevin Briggs, Assistant Public 

Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. 

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

NORTHCUTT, SALARIO, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
# EUR-Lex - 31975D0752 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31975D0752

**75/752/EEC: Commission Decision of 20 November 1975 exempting the United Kingdom from applying Council Directive No 70/458/EEC to certain vegetable species (Only the English text is authentic) **

*
Official Journal L 319 , 10/12/1975 P. 0012 - 0012 *

COMMISSION DECISION of 20 November 1975 exempting the United Kingdom from applying Council Directive No 70/458/EEC to certain vegetable species (Only the English text is authentic) (75/752/EEC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community;

Having regard to the Council Directive of 29 September 1970 (1) on the marketing of vegetable seed, as last amended by the Council Directive of 11 December 1973 (2), and in particular Article 42 thereof;

Having regard to the request from the United Kingdom;

Whereas the Commission has already granted to the United Kingdom, by its Decisions No 73/188/EEC (3) and No 74/363/EEC (4), exemption in respect of certain species;

Whereas seed of Anthriscus cerefolium L. Hoffm. has no significance for the United Kingdom, although it is marketed there ; whereas the Directive permits exemption to be granted in respect of the species concerned without imposing any special requirement;

Whereas the species Capsicum annuum L., Solanum melongena L. and Valerianella locusta (L.) Betcke, are not normally cultivated in the United Kingdom ; whereas the seeds of these species are not propagated or marketed there;

Whereas during such time as these conditions obtain it is appropriate to exempt the United Kingdom from applying the provisions of this Directive to the species in question;

Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the Opinion of the Standing Committee on Seeds and Propagating Material for Agriculture, Horticulture and Forestry,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The United Kingdom is hereby exempted from applying the provisions of the Council Directive of 29 September 1970 on the marketing of vegetable seed, with the exception of Articles 16 (1) and 30 (1), to the species listed below:

>PIC FILE= "T9000662">

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the United Kingdom.

Done at Brussels, 20 November 1975.

For the Commission

P.J. LARDINOIS

Member of the Commission (1)OJ No L 225, 12.10.1970, p. 7. (2)OJ No L 356, 27.12.1973, p. 79. (3)OJ No L 194, 16.7.1973, p. 16. (4)OJ No L 196, 19.7.1974, p. 21.
#### § 60.152 Implementation.

DOE shall implement a quality assurance program based on the criteria of appendix B of 10 CFR part 50 as applicable, and appropriately supplemented by additional criteria as required by § 60.151.
IV 

House Calendar No. 108 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 463 

[Report No. 109–259] 

Of inquiry directing the Secretary of Homeland Security to provide certain 

information to the House of Representatives relating to the reapportionment of airport screeners. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 27, 2005 

Mr. BLUMENAUER (for himself, Mr. HOLDEN, Ms. HOOLEY, Mr. WATT, Mr. 

COOPER, Mr. DEFAZIO, Mr. WU, Mr. LEWIS of Georgia, Mr. MENENDEZ, 

Mr. FORD, Mr. SNYDER, Mr. GRIJALVA, Mr. PASTOR, and Mr. TERRY) 

submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee 

on Homeland Security 

OCTOBER 28, 2005 

Additional sponsors: Mr. MEEKS of New York and Mr. LANGEVIN

OCTOBER 28, 2005 

Reported adversely from the Committee on Homeland Security, referred to the 

House Calendar, and ordered to be printed 

RESOLUTION 

Of inquiry directing the Secretary of Homeland Security 

to provide certain information to the House of Representatives relating to the reapportionment of airport screeners. 
2 

•HRES 463 RH 

1 Resolved, That the Secretary of Homeland Security 

2 is directed to furnish the House of Representatives, not 

3 later than 14 days after the date of the adoption of this 

4 resolution, all documents and records in his possession re5 lating to the review of the screener allocation model of the 

6 Transportation Security Administration and the subse7 quent reapportionment of airport screeners employed by 

8 the Transportation Security Administration which was an9 nounced on or around July 26, 2005. 

House Calendar No. 108 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 463 

[Report No. 109–259] 

RESOLUTION 

Of inquiry directing the Secretary of Homeland Setionment of airport screeners. House of Representatives relating to the reappor- curity to provide certain information to the 

OCTOBER 28, 2005 

Reported adversely from the Committee on Homeland Sebe printed curity, referred to the House Calendar, and ordered to
4 3-8" 3-8" 4
|
f
8 ea |
‘© ice) ik co deek N\
— on XN
bp ee EN is
w > I
. m
[o) 4 - -
4d i-ek
N Position of Guy RY \u
(When Req'd) j
ae I
vant Nos 1 |
d-ek | |! | |
|} 1 cm |
Il | |
1 oI _ |
j | oe It
It |
Io It
lo toot
I ot Io
I oot Io
I od tot
| I
| | Specify VC1.12P for ||
| | offset neutral assembly | |
bJ low)
ASSEMBLY: VC1.|11P|12P
ITEM MATERIAL QTY|QTY
c |Bolt, machine, 5/8" x req’d length 3| 3
d [Washer, square, 2 1/4 5 | 5
g |Crossarm, 3 5/8"x 4 5/8" x 8-0" 1 1
i Bolt, carriage, 3/8" x 4° 2|2
j_|Screw, lag, 1/2" x 4" 113
bs _|Bolt, single, upset 1
cm |Insulator, spool, 3° 1|1
cu _|Brace, 28" 2|2
ea |Insulator, post type (24.9/14.4 kV) 3 | 3
eb |Bracket, pole top 1[1
ec | Bracket, offset_neutral 1
ek_| Locknuts 6/6

DESIGN PARAMETERS:

MAXIMUM LINE ANGLES:
5’ — Small Conductors
2 — Larger than #1/0

SINGLE SUPPORT ON CROSSARM
(TANGENT) (POST INSULATORS)

DEC 1998

RUS

3 — PHASE PRIMARY
24.9/14.4 kV

VC1.11P
VC1.12P
#### § 830.201 Performance of work.

A contractor must perform work in accordance with the DOE-approved safety basis for a Hazard Category 1, 2, or 3 DOE nuclear facility and, in particular, with the hazard controls that ensure adequate protection of workers, the public, and the environment.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

REVISED JUNE 27, 2008

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-51281

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

DANA YOUNG, also known as Dana Dee Young

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 6:07-CR-111-ALL

Before KING, DeMOSS, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Dana Dee Young was convicted by a jury of being a felon in possession of

a firearm. Young was sentenced to a 36-month term of imprisonment and to a

three-year period of supervised release and was ordered to pay a $2,000 fine.

Young gave timely notice of his appeal. 

Young contends that the district court erred in denying his motion to

suppress the firearm found during a traffic stop. Young contends that the

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

June 26, 2008

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 07-51281

2

weapon was discovered after the traffic stop should have ended. The police

officer who detained Young developed, during the course of the traffic stop, a

reasonable and articulable suspicion that a crime had been or was being

committed by Young. Before the final records check was completed, the officer

knew that Young had been behaving suspiciously in the early morning hours in

an area known for narcotics trafficking and prostitution, that Young appeared

to be nervous, that Young had voluntarily produced two crack pipes, that Young

was known for carrying a knife, and that Young had repeatedly moved his hands

to his waistband despite repeated instructions by the officer not to do so. Under

these circumstances, it was reasonable for the officer to continue to detain after

the final records check had been completed and to frisk Young to determine

whether he was carrying narcotics or a weapon in his waistband. The district

court did not clearly err in denying the motion to suppress. See United States

v. Brigham, 382 F.3d 500, 506-09 (5th Cir. 2004) (en banc). 

Young contends that the district court erred in refusing to adjust his

offense level for acceptance of responsibility. Young argues that he never denied

that he possessed the weapon and that he went to trial only so that he would

have an opportunity to tell his story. Young has not shown that this case

presents a rare situation in which a defendant that has exercised his

constitutional right to a jury trial has also clearly demonstrated acceptance of

responsibility for the offense. See U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1, comment. (n.2). The district

court did not clearly err in refusing to award an adjustment for acceptance of

responsibility. See United States v. Cordero, 465 F.3d 626, 630-32 (5th Cir.

2006). 

AFFIRMED.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 24-0263

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellant,

v.

THOMAS JOSEPH BRENNAN,

Defendant and Appellee.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 30-day extension of time, 

and good cause appearing therefor,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellee is granted an extension of 

time to and including September 27, 2024, within which to prepare, serve, 

and file his response brief.

Electronically signed by:

Bowen Greenwood

Clerk of the Supreme Court

August 28 2024

08/28/2024

Case Number: DA 24-0263
# EUR-Lex - 31988D0203 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31988D0203

**88/203/EEC: Commission Decision of 18 February 1988 approving the plan relating to the examination for hormone residues submitted by France (Only the French text is authentic) **

*
Official Journal L 094 , 12/04/1988 P. 0029 - 0029 *

*****

COMMISSION DECISION

of 18 February 1988

approving the plan relating to the examination for hormone residues submitted by France

(Only the French text is authentic)

(88/203/EEC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community,

Having regard to Council Directive 86/469/EEC of 16 September 1986 concerning examination of animals and fresh meat for the presence of residues (1), and in particular Article 4 thereof,

Whereas, by document of 17 September 1987, France sent the Commission a plan setting out the national measures taken on the examination for residues of the substances referred to in Annex I (A), Groups I and II to Directive 86/469/EEC;

Whereas examination of this plan, as modified, has shown that it conforms to the provisions laid down in Directive 86/469/EEC, and in particular Article 4 (1) thereof;

Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Veterinary Committee,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The plan relating to the examination for residues of the substances referred to in Annex I (A), Groups I and II to Directive 86/469/EEC submitted by France is hereby approved.

Article 2

France shall adopt the necessary laws, regulations and administrative provisions for the implementation of the plan referred to in Article 1.

Article 3

This Decision is addressed to the French Republic.

Done at Brussels, 18 February 1988.

For the Commission

Frans ANDRIESSEN

Vice-President

(1) OJ No L 275, 26. 9. 1986, p. 36.
#### § 12.310 Payment of award.

An applicant seeking payment of an award shall submit to the appropriate official of the paying agency a copy of the Commission's final decision granting the award, accompanied by a certification that the applicant will not seek review of the decision in the United States courts. Where the award is granted against the Commission, the applicant shall make the submission to the Director, Division of Accounting and Finance, Office of the Controller, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555. The NRC will pay the amount awarded to the applicant within 60 days.