alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Regulator ·y Ev aluation

Docker No. FAA- 

## .20lS"

-N;vt
- 

# oq 

# 3

- 4J) D i rectorate Identifier: -AD (f'nm mokc c.:hany,l!
. ' to rh c nduc. \ 111 the tahle helo1r. you/111/.\l ('1/Sttrc' th £' to t al.\ U[ll.lu t<' occording./y. (I theP do JJU I. clic k tor Tuh) in to unci r!J en our u(tlte 

### dumgl!d cl!f/
. Es tim a t ed Co s t s : Ac ti o n Cos t s per Product (e.g., a ircraft , engine , (e.g., Inspection , propelle r . app li a nc e) Wor k-h ours Labor Parts Cost To tal Costs Number of Tota l Cost replacement) (include cost ( labor + 

## u.s. for U.S. F leet Do nor include on conditi on cos ts her e a ccess . t es tin g . ( @ $85 / h pa rt s) Registered and close-up) ou r ) Product s 

## SB**I** 

### 0 8 acco mpli s hme nt A

T h e k n own numbe r of products in co m p lian ce: Tota l Costs of co mplianc e fo r U

. S

. tleet: $680 Costs cove r ed und e r war r anty (if known) $ On-Co n d i t i on Cos t s: Act ion Work

- hours Labor cost Parts Cost Cos t per Product (e
. g .. In s p ec tion , ( includ e access , ( @ $85 /hour) r es tin g , and clo se- r e pla ce ment) up )



### S p ecial co n si d e rations fo r · 

### Ec onom i c A nal ys i s (Use thi s.fie ld to e xplain anything in th e Es timated Cos t s tab l e that u ·as ass um ed o r mi gh t not be obvio u s. This.field ca n also be u sed /o e.•plainwarrant y cos t s) :

### Exe cutive Order 12866: 

### Cou ld th e AD be co n s i de r ed a "s ign i fica nt regulatory

# act**on'"? ~**  YES* 

# D**NO~** 

### *E xplanatio n : DOT Regulatory Policie s and Pt·ocedur es: 

### I s t he AD s i gn i ficant ?

# ~ YES * 0**NO~** 

### *Ex planatio n : Reg ula tory Flex ibili ty Act: 

### W ill t he AD have a signiticant econo mic impact on a substa ntia l number of s mal l en titi es? Exp l a i

n for e ith er a Yes or No answer. 

# 0 YES 

# D**O~** 

### Ex pl anat i o n : l ntt·a state Av i at ion in Alaska: 

### T h is AD could affect int ra s tate aviat i o n in Alaska. I s it appropriate to inc lud e spec ifi c r e q uirements for airc raft ope rated in A l as k a whe r e aviation mi ght be the on l y m ode of tra n spo r ta ti o n ?

# ~ YES* 

# D**NO~** 

### *Exp l a nat i o n:
(logo) WELLS      **Commercial Mortgage Servicing**

**           **FARGO**  **D1086-120, 12th Floor

                             550 South Tryon Street

                             Charlotte, NC 28202

                             1-800-326-1334

 

 

Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc.

1585 Broadway

New York, New York 10036

Attention: Stephen Holmes

 

ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

 

Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement d a t e d as of February 1, 2013, by and among Banc of America Merrill Lynch Commercial Mortgage Inc., as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, Certificate Administrator, Certificate Registrar, Authenticating Agent and Custodian, NS Servicing II, LLC as Special Servicer, Situs Holdings, LLC, as Trust Advisor and U.S. Bank, National Association as Trustee, with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2013-C8 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 13.9 of the Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of 

    Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1.        A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from January 1,2014 through December 31, 2014 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance

per the Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and

 

2.        To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 6thday of March 2015.

 

 

 

 

           /s/ Daniel Bober

           Daniel Bober

           Executive Vice President

           Wells Fargo Bank

 

 

 

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             Together we’ll go far
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.3

              CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.ss.1350 AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of AccuPoll
Holding Corp. (the "Company") for the quarter ended December 31, 2002, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company each hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: February 14, 2003

                                          /S/ DENNIS VADURA
                                         Dennis Vadura
                                         Chief Executive Officer


                                          /S/ CRAIG A. HEWITT
                                         -------------------------------------
                                         Craig A. Hewitt
                                         Chief Financial Officer
#### § 176.200 Procedure.

The award official shall insert the standard award term in this subpart in all awards funded in whole or in part with Recovery Act funds.
NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION

File Name: 18a0496n.06

No. 18-1151

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

CHARLES MASON, 

Defendant-Appellant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

ON APPEAL FROM THE 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT 

COURT FOR THE EASTERN 

DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

Before: SILER and KETHLEDGE, Circuit Judges; and OLIVER, District Judge.*

KETHLEDGE, Circuit Judge. Charles Mason pled guilty to nine felony counts related to

an extensive credit-card fraud and identity-theft scheme. In a written plea agreement, Mason and 

the government stipulated that the Guidelines range for these offenses was 145-175 months’ 

imprisonment. Mason also agreed to waive his right to appeal his sentence, so long as the sentence 

imposed did not exceed 175 months. At his sentencing hearing, Mason nevertheless made 

numerous objections to the parties’ agreed-upon Guidelines calculation. The district court 

overruled those objections, but imposed a 126-month sentence—below the agreed-upon range. 

Mason now appeals that sentence, again challenging the Guidelines calculation in his plea 

agreement. 

 

* The Honorable Judge Solomon Oliver, Jr., United States District Judge for the Northern 

District of Ohio, sitting by designation. 
No. 18-1151, United States v. Mason

-2-

What Mason omits to say, anywhere in his opening (and only) brief on appeal, is that he 

waived his right to appeal his sentence. An unsuspecting reader—such as a judge of this court—

could thus take the time to read all of Mason’s brief, and to consider at least preliminarily the 

arguments raised there, without realizing that Mason quite likely has waived all of them. 

And indeed he has. A defendant may waive his right to appeal a conviction or sentence. 

See United States v. Toth, 668 F.3d 374, 377 (6th Cir. 2012). We will enforce a waiver that was 

knowing and voluntary. Id. Here, Mason agreed not to appeal his sentence if it did not exceed 

175 months, which obviously it did not. And Mason offers no reason to doubt that his waiver was 

knowing and voluntary. Indeed, when the government raised the issue of waiver on appeal, Mason 

neglected to respond or even to file a reply brief. In a civil case, this conduct would be grounds 

for sanctions. See Fed. R. App. P. 38.

We enforce Mason’s waiver and dismiss this appeal.
Second Department,

June, 1970

(June 1, 1970)

#### In the Matter of Edward J. Kelly and John P. Whalen, Attorneys, Respondents. Samuel Greason, Petitioner.

Application by respondent Whalen to change, to June 15, 1970, the date of commencement of Ms six-months’ suspension from the practice of law. The order of this court, dated April 20, 1970, which imposed the six-months’ suspension, fixed the date for the commencement of the suspension as May 15, 1970. Since then, a stay was granted by a Judge of the Court of Appeals and that stay has terminated. Application granted. The six-months suspension of respondent Whalen is herewith changed so as to commence as of June 15, 1970. Christ, P. J., Rabin, Hopkins, Munder and Martuscello, JJ., concur.
#### McNEILLY, Respondent, v. LACKAWANNA BRIDGE CO., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

November 11, 1914.)

Action by Samuel D. McNeilly against the Lackawanna Bridge Company.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.

LAMBERT, J., dissents, upon the ground that the plaintiff failed to establish actionable negligence against the defendant and that the plaintiff assumed the risk and was guilty of contributory negligence as matter of law.
#### Ives *et al. v.*Rice.

*Bill to enforce Vendor’s Lien.*

1. *Setting aside sale under decree, on proof of payment.*— Under a decree declaring a.vendor’s lien, the lands not having been sold until after the lapse of twelve years, the sale was set aside, and satisfaction of the decree entered, on proof of full payment before the sale.

Appeal from Lauderdale Chancery Court.

Heard before Hon. Thomas Cobbs.

Appellants filed a bill to enforce the vendor’s lien. A decree was rendered in their favor in November, 1873. In August, 1885, the register sold the land and made a report of sale. The defendant submitted exceptions to this report, and filed a petition to set aside the sale on the ground that the decree against Mm had been paid. The question of payment *veil non*was referred to the register, who reported that payment had been made. Complainants filed exceptions to this report, which exceptions were overruled, and a decree was rendered, that the register enter satisfaction on the record of the decree theretofore rendered against defendant in 1873, and setting aside the sale in August, 1885. Complainants appealed.

Emmet O’Neal, for appellants.

R. O. Pickett, *contra.*

Per Curiam.

Excluding all illegal testimony to which objection is properly taken, there remains, in the opinion of the court, a sufficient amount of legal testimony to support the conclusion reached by the chancellor, that the decree sought to be enforced in favor of appellants against the ap*283pllee had been fully paid and discharged prior to the sale of the land.

The sale was, therefore, properly set aside, and there was no error in the decree of the chancellor ordering the entry of satisfaction of the judgment, in favor of the appellant, under which the sale was made.

Affirmed.
EXHIBIT 31.2  Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  I, Toni Ann Tantillo, certify that:  1)

        I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of SITI-Sites.com, Inc. (the
Registrant)
  2)Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does
not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;  3)Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,
and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;  4)The registrants other certifying officers and
I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:  a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to
the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;  b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a
date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the Evaluation Date); and  c)   presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;  5)The registrants other certifying officers and
I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):  a)   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified any material weaknesses in internal controls; and  b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrants internal controls; and  6)The registrants other certifying
officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.   Date:   August 14, 2006By/s/   Toni Ann TantilloToni Ann TantilloChief Financial Officer, DirectorVice President, Secretary and Treasurer
   12
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>   5


<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                               9,800
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      115,800
<ALLOWANCES>                                         6,000
<INVENTORY>                                         85,900
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   224,800
<PP&E>                                           1,126,600
<DEPRECIATION>                                     556,200
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,011,400
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              167,200
<BONDS>                                            900,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                           177,600
<OTHER-SE>                                        (259,100)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1,011,400
<SALES>                                            399,800
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   399,800
<CGS>                                              364,100
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      412,400
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     1,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  42,100
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (55,700)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       (21,300)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (34,400)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (34,400)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        (0.64)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                               29879
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        51423
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                        1367381
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   1466887
<PP&E>                                              325233
<DEPRECIATION>                                     (106260)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    13999398
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              3934153
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                            252
<COMMON>                                              1851
<OTHER-SE>                                         2686378
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      13999398
<SALES>                                             172161
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    172161
<CGS>                                                89140
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       601275
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   16343
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (399227)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (399227)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (399227)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        (0.22)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (0.22)
        


</TABLE>
#### Professional Insurance Company of New York, Plaintiff, v. Desmond T. Barry et al., Defendants. Robert Chaut, Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant-Respondent, v. M. A. Schapiro & Co., Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent-Appellant, et al., Third-Party Defendants.

Order entered February 4, 1969 unanimously affirmed in all respects, with $50 costs and disbursements to third-party plaintiff. Special Term’s elimination of the $1,000 paid by Ghaut is not approved and our affirmance is not to be construed as limiting any possible recovery in this respect. Concur — Stevens, P. J., Eager, Capozzoli, Nunez and Steuer, JJ.
§ 810.1 Purpose. The regulations in this part implement section 57 b.(2) of the Atomic Energy Act, which empowers the Secretary, with the concurrence of the Department of State, and after consultation with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, the Department of Commerce, and the Department of Defense, to authorize persons to directly or indirectly engage or participate in the development or production of special nuclear material outside the United States. The purpose of the regulations in this part is to: ( a ) Identify activities that are generally authorized by the Secretary and thus require no other authorization under this part;
( b ) Identify activities that require specific authorization by the Secretary and explain how to request authorization; and
( c ) Specify reporting requirements for authorized activities.
( d ) Specify civil penalties and enforcement proceedings.
[80 FR 9375, Feb. 23, 2015, as amended at 88 FR 1979, Jan. 12, 2023]
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15**  **- 7016** 

CHARLES T. HOYE , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. HAROLD CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections; GARY L. BASS, Reg. Administrator, Virginia Department of Corrections, Central Regional Office; SAMUEL V. PRUETT, Warden, Coffeewood Correctional Center; I. T. GILMORE, Assistant Warden, Coffeewood Correctional Center; R. W. MARTIN, EBP/Reentry Manager, Coffeewood Correctional Center; D. GOURDINE, Inst. Pgms. Mgr . (IPM), Coffeewood Correctional Center; L. D. MOORE, Food Service Admin., Coffeewood Correctional Center , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia , at Roanoke

. Michael F. Urbanski , District Judge. ( 7:14

- cv
- 00124

- MFU )

Submitted : December 29, 2015 Decided: January 13, 2016

Before WILKINSON and KEENAN , Circuit Judges , and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.2 Charles T. Hoye, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Carson Vorhis, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.3 PER CURIAM:
Charles T. Hoye appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hoye v.

Clarke , No. 7:14

- cv
- 00124

- MFU (W.D. Va. May 2 7 , 2015)

. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
|us bank(logo) | All of us serving you
|------------- | ---------------------





VIA EMAIL



Barclays Commercial Mortgage Securities LLC

745 Seventh Avenue

New York, New York 10019

Attention: Daniel Vinson, Vice President

Email: daniel.vinson@barclays.com



17g5informationprovider@usbank.com



Annual Statement of Compliance

UBS-Barclays Commercial Mortgage Trust 2013-C6



|Re: | ThePooling and Servicing Agreement (the “Agreement”)
dated as of April 1, 2013 entered into by Barclays Commercial Mortgage Securities LLC, as depositor, Midland Loan Services, a Division
of PNC Bank, National Association, as master servicer, Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as special servicer, Park Bridge Lender Services
LLC, as operating advisor, and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee, certificate administrator, paying agent and custodian
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



I, Kimberly O. Jacobs,
a Senior Vice President of U.S. Bank National Association, as Certificate Administrator hereby certify that:



(1)	A review of the activities of the Certificate
Administrator during the preceding calendar year (the “Reporting Period”) and of the performance of the Certificate
Administrator under the Agreement have been made under my supervision; and



(2)	To the
best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Certificate Administrator has fulfilled its obligations under the Agreement in
all material respects throughout theReporting Period.



Capitalized terms used but not defined herein have the meanings set forth in the Agreement.



Date: March 1, 2018



U.S. Bank National Association, as Certificate Administrator



|By: | /s/ Kimberly
    O. Jacobs | 
|--- | -------------------------- | 
|    | Kimberly O. Jacobs         | 
|    | Senior Vice President      |