alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 582 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 582

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                      December 6, 2005.
    Resolved, That the Clerk be instructed to inform the President of the United 
States that the House of Representatives has elected Karen L. Haas, a citizen of 
the State of Maryland, Clerk of the House of Representatives of the One Hundred 
Ninth Congress.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
# EUR-Lex - 31975Y0422(01) - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31975Y0422(01)

**Joint Declaration of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission CONCERNING THE INSTITUTION OF A CONCILIATION PROCEDURE BETWEEN THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL **

*
Official Journal C 089 , 22/04/1975 P. 0001 - 0002 Greek special edition: Chapter 01 Volume 2 P. 0003 Spanish special edition: Chapter 01 Volume 2 P. 0009 Portuguese special edition Chapter 01 Volume 2 P. 0009 *

JOINT DECLARATION of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission

THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL AND THE COMMISSION,

Whereas from 1 January 1975, the Budget of the Communities will be financed entirely from the Communities' own resources;

Whereas in order to implement this system the European Parliament will be given increased budgetary powers;

Whereas the increase in the budgetary powers of the European Parliament must be accompanied by effective participation by the latter in the procedure for preparing and adopting decisions which give rise to important expenditure or revenue to be charged or credited to the budget of the European Communities,

HAVE AGREED AS FOLLOWS:

1. A conciliation procedure between the European Parliament and the Council with the active assistance of the Commission is hereby instituted.

2. This procedure may be followed for Community acts of general application which have appreciable financial implications, and of which the adoption is not required by virtue of acts already in existence.

3. When submitting its proposal the Commission shall indicate whether the act in question is, in its opinion, capable of being the subject of the conciliation procedure. The European Parliament, when giving its Opinion, and the Council may request that this procedure be initiated.

4. The procedure shall be initiated if the criteria laid down in paragraph 2 are met and if the Council intends to depart from the Opinion adopted by the European Parliament.

5. The conciliation shall take place in a "Conciliation Committee" consisting of the Council and representatives of the European Parliament. The Commission shall participate in the work of the Conciliation Committee.

6. The aim of the procedure shall be to seek an agreement between the European Parliament and the Council.

The procedure should normally take place during a period not exceeding three months, unless the act in question has to be adopted before a specific date or if the matter is urgent, in which case the Council may fix an appropriate time limit.

7. When the positions of the two institutions are sufficiently dose, the European Parliament may give a new Opinion, after which the Council shall take definitive action.

Done at Brussels, 4 March 1975.

For the

European Parliament

C. BERKHOUWER

For the Council

G. FITZGERALD

For the Commission

François-Xavier ORTOLI
Order entered December 22 , 2020

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05
- 20
- 01042
- CV KENNETH CRAIG WELLS AND DUSTY WELLS, Appellant s
V. MARK CROWELL AND SUZON CROWELL, App ellee s On Appeal from the 397th Judicial District Court

Grayson County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CV
- 20
- 0760

ORDER Before the Court is appellants’ December 17, 2020 unopposed motion for an
extension of time to file their brief on the merits. We GRANT the motion and
extend the time to January 5, 2021

.

/s/ ERIN A. NOWELL JUSTICE
EXHIBIT 31.4



CERTIFICATIONS



I, Donna Blank, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A of ZAIS Group Holdings, Inc.; and
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: April 29, 2016



| | By:    | /s/ Donna Blank        
| | ------ | -----------------------
| | Name:  | Donna Blank            
| | Title: | Chief Financial Officer
#### § 766.102 Calculation methodology.

(a) *Calculation of Domestic Utilities' Annual Assessment Ratio to the Fund.* Domestic utilities shall be assessed annually for their share of the Fund. The amount of the assessment shall be determined by the ratio of SWUs produced by DOE and purchased by domestic utilities prior to October 24, 1992, to the total number of SWUs produced by DOE for all purposes (including SWUs produced for defense purposes). All calculations will be carried out to the fifth significant digit. This ratio is expressed by the following hypothetical example:

| SWUs purchased by all domestic utilities | | Total SWUs produced—all purposes | | Special assessment ratio |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 12345 | ÷ | 45678 | = | .27026 |

(b) *Calculation of the Baseline Total Annual Special Assessment for Domestic Utilities.* The Annual Special Assessment ratio calculated in paragraph (a) of this section shall be multiplied by $480 million, yielding the total amount of the Baseline Total Annual Special Assessment as of October 1992. In the event that this amount is in excess of $150 million, the Baseline Total Annual Special Assessment shall be capped at $150 million. All calculations will be carried out to the fifth significant digit. The Baseline Total Annual Special Assessment is determined as shown in the following hypothetical example:

| Total fund | | Annual assessment ratio | | Baseline total annual special assessment |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| $480,000,000 | × | 0.27026 | = | $129,724,800 |

(c) *Calculation of Baseline Total Annual Special Assessment per Utility.* The ratio of the total number of SWUs purchased by an individual domestic utility for commercial electricity generation, to the total number of SWUs purchased by all domestic utilities for commercial electricity generation, multiplied by the Baseline Total Annual Special Assessment calculated in paragraph (b) of this section, determines an individual utility's share of the Baseline Total Annual Special Assessment. All calculations will be carried out to the fifth significant digit. A hypothetical example of such a calculation follows:

| Single utility SWUs | | All utility SWUs | | Utility ratio | | Baseline total annual special assessment | Individual utility special Assessment |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 300 | ÷ | 12345 | = | .02430 | × | $129,724,800 | $3,152,312.64 |

(d) *Calculation of Inflation Adjustment.* The Baseline Total Annual Special Assessment billed to domestic utilities shall be adjusted for inflation using the most recently published monthly CPI-U and the CPI-U for October 1992. All calculations will be carried out to the fifth significant digit. A hypothetical example of such a calculation follows:

| CPI-U (Mar 93) | | CPI-U (Oct 92) | | Adjustment multiplier |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 150 | ÷ | 141.8 | = | 1.05783 |

| Utility special Assessment | | Adjustment multiplier | | Adjusted utility assessment |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| $3,152,312.64 | × | 1.05783 | = | $3,334,610.88 |
#### PEOPLE ex rel. CATALANO v. BOARD OF EDUCATION.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

February 11, 1915.)

Proceeding by the People of the State of New York, on the relation of Quirino A. Catalano, against the Board of Education.

No opinion. Motion to dismiss appeal granted, with $10 costs. Order filed.
1 

### 20 15

- 0 6

- 24



## Re : Questions to incompleteness letter

– 26 May 2015

To : Chenise Farquharson

farquharson.chenise@epa.gov

We are very thankful for your willingness to list us under SNAP, and providing us with guidance to reach the requir ements needed. I have tried to the best of my knowledge, to understand and answer the questions raised in our application. I will discuss these questions to makes sure I understand the incompleteness before resubmitting, I hope this can

In the first sec tion of the R

- 1270 Incompleteness Letter_26 May 2015 the following can be read..

 “ EPA also requires additional information on topics including

, but not limited to, occupational and environmental exposure

, local air quality impacts

, and servicing and reco very practices

, based on your responses to the preliminary questions presented in this letter”

Question: I have attached our normal service and maintenance manual for the machine that will cover these points. B asically the machine is an air

- cooled chiller and does not pollute the air with any substances. Please comment if this is enough to move forward or if further explanation will be needed.

Responses/questions to the specific points raised in letter R

- 1270 Incompleteness Letter_26 May 2015

1) I have filled in the document “ Enclosure_Table of SNAP RefAC EndUses and Applications ” with the appropriate E nd U ses. Please provide comment if further information is needed to move forward with resubmitting the application.

2) I have made a qualified assumption ba sed on my knowledge and feel for the market and indicated based on

the sales of R

- 1270 chiller within the segment of R

- 1270 chiller within the respective EndUse catagories. I hope this is the correct approach, please confirm, before I move forward with re

- submitting the application.

3) We confirm we do not intend to claim any information back from the earlier submitted information.

Please communicate back to me via e

- mail; bjorn.skattberg@frigadon.se



### Kind regards

/Björn Skattberg

, Managing Director

, Frigadon AB
Editorial Note on Part 51
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 51 appear at 80 FR 74980, Dec. 1, 2015.

§ 51.97 Final environmental impact statement—materials license. ( a ) *Independent spent fuel storage installation (ISFSI).* As stated in § 51.23, the generic impact determinations regarding the continued storage of spent fuel in NUREG-2157 shall be deemed incorporated into the environmental impact statement.
( b ) *Monitored retrievable storage facility (MRS).* As provided in sections 141 (c), (d), and (e) and 148 (a) and (c) of the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982, as amended (NWPA) (96 Stat. 2242, 2243, 42 U.S.C. 10161 (c), (d), (e); 101 Stat. 1330-235, 1330-236, 42 U.S.C. 10168 (a), (c)) a final environmental impact statement for the construction of a monitored retrievable storage installation (MRS) will not address the need for the MRS or any alternative to the design criteria for an MRS set forth in section 141(b)(1) of the NWPA (96 Stat. 2242, 42 U.S.C. 10161(b)(1)) but may consider alternative facility designs which are consistent with these design criteria.
( c ) *Uranium enrichment facility.* As provided in section 5(e) of the Solar, Wind, Waste, and Geothermal Power Production Incentives Act of 1990 (104 Stat. 2834 at 2835, 42 U.S.C. 2243), a final environmental impact statement must be prepared before the hearing on the issuance of a license for a uranium enrichment facility is completed.
[49 FR 34695, Aug. 31, 1984, as amended at 53 FR 31682, Aug. 19, 1988; 57 FR 18392, Apr. 30, 1992; 79 FR 56262, Sept. 19, 2014]
IV 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1085 

Celebrating the 10th anniversary of the Women’s Congressional Staff 

Association. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 26, 2018 

Ms. FRANKEL of Florida (for herself and Ms. ROS-LEHTINEN) submitted the 

following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration 

RESOLUTION 

Celebrating the 10th anniversary of the Women’s 

Congressional Staff Association. 

Whereas, in August 2008, a bipartisan group of female congressional staffers founded the Women’s Congressional 

Staff Association (referred to in this preamble as the 

‘‘WCSA’’), the first official staff association focused on 

the professional development of female staffers; 

Whereas WCSA has over 400 active members in the House 

of Representatives and Senate; 

Whereas the commitment of the WCSA to bipartisanship fosters congeniality and respect in Congress; 

Whereas WCSA organizes and hosts a variety of career development opportunities for female staffers, such as resume 


dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1085 IH 

reviews, networking workshops, and mock interview sessions; and 

Whereas WCSA provides mentoring opportunities to further 

the career advancement and professional education of 

young staffers: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) celebrates the 10th anniversary of the Wom3 en’s Congressional Staff Association’s founding (re4 ferred to in this resolving clause as the ‘‘WCSA’’); 

5 (2) commends the WCSA on its many achieve6 ments and contributions to the congressional com7 munity; and 

8 (3) reaffirms the commitment of the House to 

9 supporting the professional development of female 

10 staff members. 

Æ 


dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          23,118
<SECURITIES>                                 1,157,238
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,514,743
<ALLOWANCES>                                    64,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,226,164
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,636,514
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          257,132
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,379,382
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,636,514
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               122,368
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                44,878
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 77,490
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             77,490
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    77,490
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
IV 

House Calendar No. 3 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 71 

[Report No. 109–3] 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 418) to establish and rapidly 

implement regulations for State driver’s license and identification document security standards, to prevent terrorists from abusing the asylum 

laws of the United States, to unify terrorism-related grounds for inadmissibility and removal, and to ensure expeditious construction of the San 

Diego border fence. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 8, 2005 

Mr. SESSIONS, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 418) to establish 

and rapidly implement regulations for State driver’s license and identification document security standards, to 

prevent terrorists from abusing the asylum laws of the 

United States, to unify terrorism-related grounds for inadmissibility and removal, and to ensure expeditious construction of the San Diego border fence. 

1 Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this 

2 resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of 
2 

HRES 71 RH 

1 rule XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee 

2 of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consider3 ation of the bill (H.R. 418) to establish and rapidly imple4 ment regulations for State driver’s license and identifica5 tion document security standards, to prevent terrorists 

6 from abusing the asylum laws of the United States, to 

7 unify terrorism-related grounds for inadmissibility and re8 moval, and to ensure expeditious construction of the San 

9 Diego border fence. The first reading of the bill shall be 

10 dispensed with. All points of order against consideration 

11 of the bill are waived. General debate shall be confined 

12 to the bill and shall not exceed one hour and 40 minutes, 

13 with 40 minutes equally divided and controlled by the 

14 chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee 

15 on the Judiciary; 40 minutes equally divided and con16 trolled by the chairman and ranking minority member of 

17 the Committee on Government Reform; and 20 minutes 

18 equally divided and controlled by the chairman and rank19 ing minority member of the Committee on Homeland Se20 curity. After general debate the Committee of the Whole 

21 shall rise without motion. No further consideration of the 

22 bill shall be in order except pursuant to a subsequent order 

23 of the House. 

House Calendar No. 3 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 71 

[Report No. 109–3] 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 418) 

tious construction of the San Diego border fence. admissibility and removal, and to ensure expediStates, to unify terrorism-related grounds for infrom abusing the asylum laws of the United ment security standards, to prevent terrorists for State driver’s license and identification docuto establish and rapidly implement regulations 

FEBRUARY 8, 2005 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed
#### National Preferred Risks, Inc., Respondent, v S. S. Silberblatt, Inc., et al., Appellants.

In an action to recover a sum of money representing premiums due on certain insurance policies, defendants appeal from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated November 26,1979, which, *inter alia,*granted plaintiff’s motion to confirm a referees report that recommended plaintiff have judgment in the principal sum of $60,694.99, (2) the judgment entered thereon on December 4,1979, and (3) a further judgment of the same court, entered January 4,1980, which directed defendants to pay the referees fee. Appeal from the order dismissed (see *Matter of Aho,*39 NY2d 241, 248). Judgments affirmed. Plaintiff is awarded one bill of costs. There was a mutual, open and current account between the parties (see *Minion v Warner,*238 NY 413; *Green v Disbrow,*79 NY 1). Therefore, the action was not barred by the Statute of Limitations (see CPLR 206, subd [d]). We have considered defendants other points and find them to be without merit. Hopkins, J. P., Gulotta, Hargett and O’Connor, JJ., concur.
§ 708.26 Time and location of hearings. ( a ) The Administrative Judge will schedule a hearing to be held by the 90th day after issuance of the report of investigation. Any extension of the hearing date must be approved by the OHA Director.
( b ) The Administrative Judge will schedule the hearing for a location near the site where the alleged retaliation occurred or the complainant's place of employment, or at another location that is appropriate considering the circumstances of a particular case. Hearings may be conducted by video teleconference or other remote means, at the Administrative Judge's discretion.
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

IndependentRegistered Public Accounting Firm’s Consent

 

Weconsent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements of Nxt-ID, Inc. on Form S-3, File No. 333-209001,Form S-3, File No. 333-206955, Form S-3, File No. 333-204026, and Form S-3, File No. 333-203637 of our report dated April 13,2017, which includes an explanatory paragraph as to our audit of adjustments to retroactively apply the reverse stock splitof the Company’s common stock and to reclassify deferred financing costs from other current assets to convertiblenotes payable on its balance sheet at December 31, 2015 which occurred subsequent to the year ended December 31, 2015, to the2015 consolidated financial statements which were audited by other auditors, and, with respect to our audit of theconsolidated financial statements of Nxt-ID, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2016, which report appears in the Form10-K, of  Nxt-ID, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2016.

 

/s/Marcum llp

 

Marcumllp

NewYork, NY

 July 7, 2017
H. Res. 534

In the House of Representatives, U.S., 

December 16, 2005.

Whereas the United States is supportive of a sovereign governing body in Iraq, including the current government as 

well as future duly elected governments and appointed officials; 

Whereas Iraq, as do all sovereign nations, has the duty and 

responsibility to indict, prosecute, and punish criminals 

within its jurisdiction; 

Whereas the Iraqi Special Tribunal holds the sovereign power 

to prosecute criminals; 

Whereas certain accused individuals have allegedly committed 

egregious crimes against humanity, genocide, and war 

crimes; 

Whereas the people of a free and democratic Iraq deserve justice for the horrific crimes inflicted upon them; and 

Whereas the Iraqi Special Tribunal is empaneled to bring 

swift and impartial justice for the people, victims, and 

the nation of Iraq: Now, therefore, be it 
2

•HRES 534 EH 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives fully supports an independent Iraqi judiciary and its efforts to serve 

the cause of justice in a free and democratic Iraq. 

Attest:

Clerk.
227 So.2d 596

#### Edward ALLEMAN v. Harry GUILLOT.

No. 50140.

Nov. 12, 1969.

In re: Edward Alleman applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of Assumption. 225 So.2d 607.

Writ refused. No error in the judgment complained of.