alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 34.1












Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm



To the Board of Directors, PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.:



We have examined management’s assertion, included in the accompanying
Report on Assessment of Compliance with Regulation AB Servicing Criteria, that Midland Loan Services, a division of PNC Bank, National
Association (“Midland” or the “Company”) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d)
of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB for all transactions serviced on the Enterprise!Loan Management
System (the “Platform”), as of December 31, 2015 and for the year then ended, excluding criteria 1122(d)(1)(iii), 1122(d)(3)(i)(B),
1122(d)(3)(i)(C), 1122(d)(3)(i)(D), 1122(d)(3)(ii), 1122(d)(3)(iii), 1122(d)(3)(iv), and 1122(d)(4)(xv), which the Company has
determined are not applicable to the servicing activities performed by it with respect to the Platform. Management is responsible
for the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s
assertion based on our examination.



Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards
of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence
about the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered
necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of selected asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise
the Platform, testing of selected servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those
selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our procedures
were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report.
Our procedures were not designed to detect noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurred prior to or subsequent to our
tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report.
We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination
on the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria.



In our opinion, management’s assertion that Midland complied
with the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2015 for the Platform is fairly
stated, in all material respects.







February 25, 2016
```

[108th Congress Public Law 233]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ233.108]

[[Page 118 STAT. 654]]

Public Law 108-233
108th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To amend the Reclamation Wastewater and Groundwater Study and Facilities 
    Act to authorize the Secretary of the Interior to participate in 
projects within the San Diego Creek Watershed, California, and for other 
            purposes. <<NOTE: May 28, 2004 -  [H.R. 1598]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress <<NOTE: Irvine Basin Surface and 
Groundwater Improvement Act of 2004. 43 USC 390h note.>> assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Irvine Basin Surface and Groundwater 
Improvement Act of 2004''.

SEC. 2. PROJECT AUTHORIZATION.

    (a) In General.--The Reclamation Wastewater and Groundwater Study 
and Facilities Act (Public Law 102-575, title XVI; 43 U.S.C. 390h et 
seq.) is amended by inserting after section 1635 the following:

``SEC. 1636. <<NOTE: 43 USC 390h-18.>> IRVINE BASIN GROUNDWATER AND 
            SURFACE WATER IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS.

    ``(a) Authorization.--The Secretary, in cooperation with the Irvine 
Ranch Water District, California, is authorized to participate in the 
design, planning, and construction of projects to naturally treat 
impaired surface water, reclaim and reuse impaired groundwater, and 
provide brine disposal within the San Diego Creek Watershed.
    ``(b) Cost Share.--The Federal share of the costs of the projects 
authorized by this section shall not exceed 25 percent of the total 
cost.
    ``(c) Limitation.--The Secretary shall not provide funds for the 
operation or maintenance of a project authorized by this section.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections in section 2 of the 
Reclamation Projects Authorization and Adjustment Act of 1992 is amended 
by inserting after the item relating to section 1635 the following:

``1636. Irvine basin groundwater and surface water improvement 
           projects.''.

    Approved May 28, 2004.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 1598:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 108-306 (Comm. on Resources).
SENATE REPORTS: No. 108-244 (Comm. on Energy and Natural Resources).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD:
                                                        Vol. 149 (2003):
                                    Oct. 15, considered and passed 
                                        House.
                                                        Vol. 150 (2004):
                                    May 19, considered and passed 
                                        Senate.

                                  <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
 
 I, Leslie J. Kessler, Chief Executive Officer of PureSafe Water Systems, Inc. (the “Registrant”), hereby certify that the Form 10-Q of PureSafe Water Systems, Inc. for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
 
 
 Date:  November 19, 2010
/s/ Leslie J. KesslerLeslie J. KesslerChief Executive Officer
Second Amendment to the Northrop Grumman Savings Plan



 Exhibit 10.1 
 SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE 
 NORTHROP GRUMMAN 
 SAVINGS EXCESS PLAN 
 (AMENDED AND
RESTATED EFFECTIVE AS OF OCTOBER 1, 2004) 
 This Amendment to the October 1, 2004 restatement of the Northrop Grumman Savings
Excess Plan (“Plan”) provides that the membership of the Plan’s Administrative Committee and the Administrative Committee for the Northrop Grumman Deferred Compensation Plan shall be the same. 
 This Amendment is effective as of April 27, 2006. 
  

	 	1.	Section 7.1(a) is amended in its entirety to read as follows: 

 (a) The Administrative Committee shall be comprised of the individuals (in their corporate capacity) who are members of the Administrative Committee for the Northrop Grumman Deferred Compensation Plan. If no such
Administrative Committee exists, the members of the Administrative Committee for the Plan shall be the individuals holding the following positions within the Company (as such titles may be modified from time to time), or their successors in office:
the Corporate Vice President and Chief Human Resources and Administration Officer; the Corporate Vice President, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer; the Vice President, Taxation; the Vice President, Trust Administration and Investments; the
Vice President Compensation, Benefits and HRIS; and the Corporate Director, Benefits Administration and Services. A member of the Administrative Committee may resign by delivering a written notice of resignation to the Corporate Vice President and
Chief Human Resources and Administration Officer. 
 *            *            *            * 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment is hereby executed by a duly authorized officer on this 27th day of April, 2006. 
  

			
	NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION
		
	By:	 	/s/    DEBORA L.
CATSAVAS        
		 	Debora L. Catsavas
		 	Vice President, Compensation, Benefits and HRIS
Regulator·y Evaluation 

Docker No. FAA-

.20lS"-N ;vt- oq 3 -4J) Directorate Identifier: -AD 

(f'nm mokc c.:hany,l!.' to rhc nduc.\ 111 the tahle helo1r. you/111/.\l ('1/Sttrc' th£' total.\ U[ll.lut<' occording./y. (I 

theP do JJUI. click tor Tuh) into unci r!Jen our u(tlte dumgl!d cl!f/. 

Estima ted Costs: 

Action Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, 

(e.g., Inspection, propeller. appliance) 

Work-hours Labor Parts Cost Total Costs Number of Total Cost replacement) (include cost (labor + u.s. for U.S. Fleet Do nor include oncondition costs here access. testing. (@$85/h parts) Registered 

and close-up) our) Products 

SB I 0 8 

accomplishment A 

T he known number of products in comp liance: 

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. tleet: $680 

Costs covered unde r warranty (if known) $ 

On-Condition Costs: 

Action Work-hours Labor cost Parts Cost Cost per Product 

(e.g .. Inspection, (include access, (@$85/hour) 

resting, and close- replacement) up) 

Special considerations for· Economic Analysis (Use this.field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table 

that u·as assumed or might not be obvious. This.field can also be used /o e.•plainwarranty costs): 
Executive Order 12866: 

Could the AD be considered a "significant regulatory act on'"? ~ 

YES* D NO~ 

*Explanation: 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Pt·ocedures: 

Is the AD significant? ~ 

YES* 0 NO~ 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act: 

Will the AD have a signiticant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

either a Yes or No answer. 0 

YES D O~ 

Explanation: 

l ntt·astate Aviation in Alaska: 

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? ~ 

YES* D NO~ 

*Explanation:
#### Mae Nielson *v.*Daniel D’Angelo

*William J. Secor, Jr.,*in support of the petition.

*Thomas L. Bray ton,*in opposition.

Decided May 1, 1984

The plaintiff’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 1 Conn. App. 239, is dismissed.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the amended Quarterly Report of AccuPoll Holding Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Diana Dimadi, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


May 20, 2005                                 /s/ Diana Dimadi
                                               ---------------------------------
                                                   Diana Dimadi
                                                   Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
CASE ANNOUNCEMENTS

*January 17, 2008*

[Cite as *01117/2008 Case Announcements,*2008-Ohio-123.]

MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS

2005-1656.

#### State v. Davis.

Licking C.P. No. 04 CR 464. This cause came on for further consideration of appellant’s motion for stay of execution scheduled for April 2, 2008. Upon consideration thereof,

It is ordered by the court that the motion is granted.

It is further ordered that this stay shall remain in effect until exhaustion of all state post-conviction proceedings, including any appeals.

It is further ordered that counsel for appellant and for the appellee shall notify this court when all proceedings for post-conviction relief before the courts of this state have been exhausted.
# L_2019109EN.01002901.xml

| 24.4.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 109/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.4.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 109/29

---

Corrigendum to Council Directive 90/270/EEC of 29 May 1990 on the minimum safety and health requirements for work with display screen equipment (fifth individual Directive within the meaning of Article 16 (1) of Directive 87/391/EEC)

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 156 of 21 June 1990
  )

On page 14, title of the Directive:

for:

‘Council Directive 90/270/EEC of 29 May 1990 on the minimum safety and health requirements for work with display screen equipment (fifth individual Directive within the meaning of Article 16(1) of Directive 87/391/EEC)’,

read:

‘Council Directive 90/270/EEC of 29 May 1990 on the minimum safety and health requirements for work with display screen equipment (fifth individual Directive within the meaning of Article 16(1) of Directive 89/391/EEC)’.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000813040         
<NAME> GREYHOUND LINES INC
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           2,927
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   47,861
<ALLOWANCES>                                       223
<INVENTORY>                                      5,238
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               134,582
<PP&E>                                         482,967
<DEPRECIATION>                                 144,426
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 659,021
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          123,975
<BONDS>                                        257,157
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     60,000
<COMMON>                                           603
<OTHER-SE>                                     152,839
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   659,021
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               636,101
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  384,518
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              21,222
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 13,973
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (17,167)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             31,140
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    27,252
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.46 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.42
        

</TABLE>
# AVS

Quality Management System Title: Domestic New Action Worksheet with S8 QPM# IR-ANM-1l30-F7 Date: Dtfember 17,2008 Revision 

### 1 

# Record ofContacts 

# 2o'o-ot/~1 FDMS Docket No. FAA-<6&- - With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed (e.g., ATA,

# M.A. ALPA, etc.)? 

# , Organization PersonContact~ Date Boeing MicbaelEo 

# I 412812009 ATA Mark Lopez 

# I 6/1512009 

# I

UNCONTROLLED COPY WHEN DOWNUOADED Check the Master Listto Verify That This is the Correct ReJision Before Use
§ 73.20 General performance objective and requirements. ( a ) In addition to any other requirements of this part, each licensee who is authorized to operate a fuel reprocessing plant pursuant to part 50 of this chapter; possesses or uses formula quantities of strategic special nuclear material at any site or contiguous sites subject to control by the licensee; is authorized to transport or deliver to a carrier for transportation pursuant to part 70 of this chapter formula quantities of strategic special nuclear material; takes delivery of formula quantities of strategic special nuclear material free on board (f.o.b.) the point at which it is delivered to a carrier for transportation; or imports or exports formula quantities of strategic special nuclear material, shall establish and maintain or make arrangements for a physical protection system which will have as its objective to provide high assurance that activities involving special nuclear material are not inimical to the common defense and security, and do not constitute an unreasonable risk to the public health and safety. The physical protection system shall be designed to protect against the design basis threats of theft or diversion of strategic special nuclear material and radiological sabotage as stated in § 73.1(a).
( b ) To achieve the general performance objective of paragraph (a) of this section a licensee shall establish and maintain, or arrange for, a physical protection system that: ( 1 ) Provides the performance capabilities described in § 73.25 for in-transit protection or in § 73.45 for fixed site protection unless otherwise authorized by the Commission;
( 2 ) Is designed with sufficient redundancy and diversity to ensure maintenance of the capabilities described in §§ 73.25 and 73.45;
( 3 ) Includes a safeguards contingency capability that can meet the criteria in appendix C to this part “Licensee Safeguards Contingency Plans;” and
( 4 ) Includes a testing and maintenance program to assure control over all activities and devices affecting the effectiveness, reliability, and availability of the physical protection system, including a demonstration that any defects of such activities and devices will be promptly detected and corrected for the total period of time they are required as a part of the physical protection system.
( c ) Each licensee subject to the requirements of paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section shall establish, maintain, and follow NRC-approved safeguards physical protection and safeguards contingency plans that describe how the licensee will comply with the requirements of paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section.
[44 FR 68188, Nov. 28, 1979, as amended at 57 FR 33430, July 29, 1992]
July 30, 2014 

Clean Power Plants/Carbon Pollution Emission Guidelines for Existing 

Stationary Sources and Standards for Modified and Reconstructed Stationary Sources: EGUs 

Atlanta,GA 

Registration/Sign-up Sheet 

Time Number Name 

9:15 1 

0:\T~~ c>ltl1(/'J~# 9:20 2 

b(;:;cn f5,t,neu) ~ 

9:25 3 J 

\lot+_ {YJ.-,'1 1 

'· \ . . "-'' l 

J 

9:30 4 

R.o~· 1Y/CL()n ,tl1r} 

9:35 5 

flo_cJ..L} ~~_-f~/' 

9:40 6 

Chn"-) ((\Yrut.VcWQ / 

9:45 7 

Jc< 'cj- HrA~-5 

9:50 8 

Cha/L(p.DJoneLJ 

9:55 9 

Bnon F,+G~r;c( 10:00 10 

rYln+,'rJ rVJc. G(\C"-lt< ' ~~ 10:05 11 

~hlf) L\J1V1~C: if 

10:10 12 

~~D(a~~ 
10 :15 13 

JJJlr; f) l<Jk''Z:J 

10 :20 14 I 

. ~. ~-:-1-h c~C\.lrw) ,,u 

10:25 '"''<: 15 .. 

{);.<''~1· ft1 c~JI lj 

'"-.! 

10:30 16___ 

Ul.c~~ &ccen_., 

10:40 17Lhv :cl tfa.roK:r r"/ 

10:45 

llorvnnL icrn 

10:50 

19 ~(UJlf (4~~ 7+ 

20 ' 

f'\i~ 

10:55 

rn ~ ~ lhLll'G 

11:00 2arl :r+yChsuJ n, VZ1 

11:05 22 . 

f'l<-e_t- Pol<x w 1 

23 A , k.. 11:10 

Clu!~ ftlLtL ....._ ' 

-

- . 

24 ' ' I I ~ L' b : ( 

11:15 

CU-:' VlOlc . 'j _, t .... 11:20 Z5, 1) . _£}.."'-vl± : vti IJ I.'J l}L 

11:25 26 •J 

Ocl\(

1

ht (f\_lf:l 

11:30 27 ,. 

~ 

I h c:CYYwi,U ctl, I )1 '\ 
11:35 28 J,,) (.l(u 

J' ~,(fVl{<A; r-~4-- 11:40 29&: 

'-._J 

.. ·.JJ u);y 

11:45 30 

cd~ * 2/~fc\Vl 11:50 31 

~ Lu\rJcr\} 

11:55 32 

LUNCH 12-1; reading opening 

statements 1:00-1:15 

1:15 

' 5~ 1

Lh.t'1-LL5f 8e.s( llOh 

1:20 34 '~ 

'-"@; ~ •1unf ~{ 1 

1:25 

.__ ~ ~ Y(la.J) tf'tJY:: hn° 

1:30 36 .8Jnr.t -PC~ &Jh 

1:35 ' 37 

0 @J Vl!(a,uf(\ !Jo::n 

1:40 38 

\J 8; ~C\11c\.cd / mor ru _... 

1:45 39 

Vrx\\ \C~ r r;'AQ 

1:50 40 'J 

~o\0 \~ 1:55 ciD 41 

. VJJ(j(\ /' 

jc·(\~ I\ 
2:00 

2:05 43 

2:10 

2:15 

2:20 

2:25 

2:30 48 

2:35 

2:40 

tpn i'(j:\-c\\))~~+-----------1 50 

&\(et\'1 

2:45 51 

2:50 

2:55 53 

3:00 

3:05 

3:10 
3:15 (§,~ 57 

,)( 1-L ("11 \rnr 

3:20 

tv 58 ' 

?-\0 cnJo f\/0. vk ~ 3:25 @ 59 ,j 

~ Glon o fo:h JrY\ 

3:30 

~ 60 

~ .A)...N .. lv Art u~._ 

3:35 61 

3:40 62 

3:45 63 

3:50 64 

3:55 65 

4:00 66 

4:05 67 

4:10 68 

4:15 69 

4:20 70 

4:25 71 
4:30 72 

4:35 73 

4:40 74 

4:45 75 

4:50 76 

4:55 77 

5:00 

Dinner Break 5pm- 6pm; 

6:00 78 

6:05 79 

6:10 80 

6:15 81 

6:20 82 

6:25 83 

6:30 84 

6:35 85 

6:40 86 
6:45 87 

6:50 88 

6:55 89 

7:00 90 

7:05 91 

7:10 92 

7:15 93 

7:20 94 

7:25 95 

7:30 96 

7:35 97 

7:40 98 

7:45 99 

7:50 100 

7:55 101
IV 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 55 

Recognizing the 100th anniversary of Rotary International. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 26, 2005 

Mr. SHERMAN (for himself and Mr. WILSON of South Carolina) submitted the 

following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Government 

Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the 100th anniversary of Rotary International. 

Whereas Rotary International, founded on February 23, 

1905, is a worldwide organization of business and professional leaders that provides humanitarian service, encourages high ethical standards in all vocations, and helps 

build goodwill and peace in the world; 

Whereas approximately 1,200,000 Rotarians belong to more 

than 31,000 Rotary clubs located in 166 countries; 

Whereas nearly 400,000 Rotarians in more than 7,500 Rotary clubs in the United States voluntarily support thousands of humanitarian and educational projects to benefit 

communities in this Nation and abroad; 

Whereas Rotarians are committed to the motto ‘‘Service 

Above Self’’ and to ‘‘The Four-Way Test’’ of business 
2 

•HRES 55 IH 

ethics, a philosophy that encourages truth, fairness, goodwill, and mutual benefit in all professional actions; 

Whereas Rotarians support efforts to provide educational opportunities and to meet basic human needs because these 

efforts are essential steps to greater world understanding, 

goodwill, and peace; 

Whereas the founding of Rotary International encouraged the 

creation and expansion of service clubs in the 20th century, and these service clubs generated a formalized spirit 

of community voluntarism in the United States; 

Whereas the PolioPlus program, created by Rotary International to eradicate the dreaded disease of polio, has 

helped to vaccinate more than 2,000,000,000 children 

against the disease; 

Whereas Rotary International is the only nongovernmental 

organization to join in partnership with the World Health 

Organization, the United Nations Children’s Fund 

(UNICEF), and the Centers for Disease Control and 

Prevention to achieve the goal of the total eradication of 

polio in 2005; 

Whereas the work of Rotary International for the eradication 

of polio is an outstanding and noteworthy humanitarian 

effort by a nonprofit organization; and 

Whereas February 23, 2005, marks the centennial anniversary of Rotary International: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) recognizes the 100th anniversary of Rotary 

3 International and commends Rotary International 

4 for a century of humanitarian service; 
3 

•HRES 55 IH 

1 (2) acknowledges the important service and 

2 contributions of Rotary International to local com3 munities and the world; and 

4 (3) expresses its appreciation for the significant 

5 contributions of Rotary International to achieving a 

6 99 percent reduction of polio in the world, and looks 

7 forward to celebrating the global eradication of polio 

8 in 2005. 

Æ
#### § 52.89 [Reserved]