7520 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 33 / Friday, February 19, 2010 / Notices 

on February 27, 2009 and March 11, 

2009. 74 FR 12377–78 (Mar. 24, 2009). 

The complaint, as supplemented, 

alleged violations of section 337 in the 

importation into the United States, the 

sale for importation, or the sale within 

the United States after importation of 

certain digital cameras by reason of 

infringement of several claims of United 

States Patent Nos. 5,731,852 and 

6,229,695. The complaint named 

Eastman Kodak Company of Rochester, 

New York (‘‘Kodak’’) as respondent. 

On January 8, 2010, Samsung and 

Kodak filed a joint motion to terminate 

the investigation in its entirety based on 

the execution of a settlement agreement. 

On January 20, 2010, the Commission 

investigative attorney filed a response in 

support of the motion to terminate the 

investigation. 

On January 21, 2010, the ALJ issued 

the subject ID (Order No. 19) 

terminating the investigation. None of 

the parties petitioned for review of the 

ID. The Commission has determined not 

to review the ID. Accordingly, this 

investigation is terminated. 

The authority for the Commission’s 

determination is contained in section 

337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in 

section 210.42(h) of the Commission’s 

Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 

210.42(h)). 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: February 12, 2010. 

Marilyn R. Abbott, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2010–3248 Filed 2–18–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 337–TA–687] 

In the Matter of Certain Video Displays, 

Components Thereof, and Products 

Containing Same; Notice of 

Commission Decision Not To Review 

an Initial Determination Granting 

Complainant’s Motion To File a Second 

Amended Complaint and To Amend 

the Notice of Investigation 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that 

the U.S. International Trade 

Commission has determined not to 

review an initial determination (‘‘ID’’) 

(Order No. 12) of the presiding 

administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’) 

granting complainant’s motion to file a 

second amended complaint and to 

amend the notice of investigation in the 

above-captioned investigation. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Clint Gerdine, Esq., Office of the 

General Counsel, U.S. International 

Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., 

Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 

708–2310. Copies of non-confidential 

documents filed in connection with this 

investigation are or will be available for 

inspection during official business 

hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the 

Office of the Secretary, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, 500 E 

Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, 

telephone (202) 205–2000. General 

information concerning the Commission 

may also be obtained by accessing its 

Internet server at http://www.usitc.gov. 

The public record for this investigation 

may be viewed on the Commission’s 

electronic docket (EDIS) at http:// 

edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired 

persons are advised that information on 

this matter can be obtained by 

contacting the Commission’s TDD 

terminal on (202) 205–1810. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Commission instituted this investigation 

on September 16, 2009, based on a 

complaint filed by LG Electronics, Inc. 

(‘‘LGE’’) of Korea. 74 FR 47616. The 

complaint, as amended, alleges 

violations of section 337 of the Tariff 

Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 

1337, in the importation into the United 

States, the sale for importation, and the 

sale within the United States after 

importation of certain video displays, 

components thereof, and products 

containing same by reason of 

infringement of certain claims of U.S. 

Patent Nos. 5,790,096; 5,537,612; 

5,459,522; and 7,154,564. The 

complaint further alleges the existence 

of a domestic industry. The 

Commission’s notice of investigation 

named the following respondents: Funai 

Electric Company, Ltd. of Japan; Funai 

Corporation, Inc. of Rutherford, New 

Jersey; P&F USA, Inc. of Alpharetta, 

Georgia; and Vizio, Inc. of Irvine, 

California. 

On November 25, 2009, complainant 

filed a motion for leave to file a second 

amended complaint and to amend the 

notice of investigation to add the 

following respondents to the 

investigation: AmTran Technology Co., 

Ltd. of Taiwan; and AmTran Logistics, 

Inc. of Irvine, California (collectively 

‘‘AmTran’’). 

On January 8, 2010, the ALJ issued 

the subject ID granting complainant’s 

motion for leave to file a second 

amended complaint and to amend the 

notice of investigation. On January 20, 

2010, the ALJ issued an order (Order 

No. 13) suspending the current 

procedural schedule of the investigation 

until a new one can be set in the second 

half of February 2010. On January 21, 

2010, Amtran petitioned for review of 

the ID. On January 26, 2010, the 

Commission investigative attorney and 

LGE each filed a response in opposition 

to Amtran’s petition for review. The 

Commission has determined not to 

review this ID. The Commission notes 

that the ALJ has the authority to move 

the hearing dates and target date to 

avoid any resulting prejudice to 

AmTran being added as a respondent 

over four months after institution of the 

investigation. 

The authority for the Commission’s 

determination is contained in section 

337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, and in 

sections 210.14, 210.42(c), and 

210.43(d) of the Commission’s Rules of 

Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.14, 

210.42(c), 210.43(d). 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: February 12, 2010. 

Marilyn R. Abbott, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2010–3250 Filed 2–18–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 337–TA–632] 

Certain Refrigerators and Components 

Thereof; Notice of the Commission’s 

Final Determination of No Violation of 

Section 337, Extension of Target Date, 

Termination of the Investigation 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that 

the U.S. International Trade 

Commission has determined that there 

is no violation of Section 337 of the 

Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. * 1337) by 

LG Electronics, Inc.; LG Electronics, 

USA, Inc.; and LG Electronics 

Monterrey Mexico, S.A., De, CV. The 

target date of the investigation is 

extended to February 12, 2010. The 

investigation is terminated. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Megan M. Valentine, Esq., Office of the 

General Counsel, U.S. International 

Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., 

Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 

708–2301. Copies of the presiding 

Administrative Law Judge’s (‘‘ALJ’’) 

Initial Determinations (‘‘ID’’) and all 

other non-confidential documents filed 

in connection with this investigation are 


pwalker on DSK8KYBLC1PROD with NOTICES