alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 850.12 Implementation. ( a ) The responsible employer must manage and control beryllium exposures in all DOE beryllium activities consistent with the approved CBDPP.
( b ) No person employed by DOE or a DOE contractor may take or cause any action inconsistent with the requirements of: ( 1 ) This part,
( 2 ) An approved CBDPP, and
( 3 ) Any other Federal statute or regulation concerning the exposure of workers to beryllium at DOE facilities.
( c ) No task involving potential exposure to airborne beryllium that is outside the scope of the existing CBDPP may be initiated until an update of the CBDPP is approved by the Head of DOE Field Element, except in an unexpected situation and, then, only upon approval of the Head of DOE Field Element.
( d ) Nothing in this part precludes a responsible employer from taking any additional protective action that it determines to be necessary to protect the health and safety of workers.
( e ) Nothing in this part affects the responsibilities of DOE officials under the Federal Employee Occupational Safety and Health Program (29 CFR part 1960) and related DOE directives.
H. Res. 754

In the House of Representatives, U.S., 

April 4, 2006.

Resolved, That the following named Members be, and 

they are hereby, elected to the following standing committee 

of the House of Representatives: 

COMMITTEE ON SCIENCE: Mr. Neugebauer to rank after 

Mr. Feeney and Mr. Mario Diaz-Balart of Florida.

Attest: 

Clerk.
PGI 249.109-70 Limitation on pricing of the terminated effort.       When there is a termination for convenience (partial or whole) or a change that reduces scope, the price of the terminated or reduced effort that the contractor is required to credit back to the Government shall not be more than the original amount placed on contract for that effort.    **Parent topic:** PGI 249.109 Settlement agreements.
§ 710.8 Action on derogatory information. ( a ) If a question arises as to the individual's access authorization eligibility, the Local Director of Security shall authorize the conduct of a consultation with the individual, or other appropriate actions and, on the basis of the results of such consultation or actions, may authorize the granting of the individual's access authorization. If, in the opinion of the Local Director of Security, the question as to the individual's access authorization eligibility has not been favorably resolved, the Local Director of Security shall submit the matter to the Manager with a recommendation that authority be obtained to process the individual's case under administrative review procedures set forth in this part.
( b ) If the Manager agrees that unresolved derogatory information is present and that appropriate attempts to resolve such derogatory information have been unsuccessful, the Manager shall notify the Director of the proposal to conduct an administrative review proceeding, accompanied by an explanation of the security concerns and a duplicate Personnel Security File. If the Manager believes that the derogatory information has been favorably resolved, the Manager shall direct that access authorization be granted for the individual. The Manager may also direct the Local Director of Security to obtain additional information prior to deciding whether to grant the individual access authorization or to submit a request for authority to conduct an administrative review proceeding. A decision in the matter shall be rendered by the Manager within 10 calendar days of its receipt.
( c ) Upon receipt of the Manager's notification, the Director shall review the matter and confer with the Manager on: ( 1 ) The institution of administrative review proceedings set forth in §§ 710.20 through 710.30;
( 2 ) The granting of access authorization; or
( 3 ) Other actions as the Director deems appropriate.
( d ) The Director shall act pursuant to one of these options within 30 calendar days of receipt of the Manager's notification unless an extension is granted by the Deputy Director for Security, Office of Environment, Health, Safety and Security.
[81 FR 71335, Oct. 17, 2016, as amended at 88 FR 41292, June 26, 2023; 89 FR 59596, July 23, 2024]
IV 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 135 

Urging North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) member countries to 

meet or exceed the two percent gross domestic product commitment 

to spending on defense. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 16, 2017 

Mr. BISHOP of Michigan (for himself and Mr. TROTT) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

RESOLUTION 

Urging North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) member 

countries to meet or exceed the two percent gross domestic product commitment to spending on defense. 

Whereas in 2006, the defense ministers of North Atlantic 

Treaty Organization (NATO) Alliance member countries 

agreed to commit a minimum of two percent, as a percentage of gross domestic product (GDP) to spending on 

defense; 

Whereas in 2006, the defense ministers of NATO Alliance 

member countries further agreed to commit a minimum 

of 20 percent of defense expenditures to major equipment 

spending; 

Whereas these commitments were reaffirmed in the Wales 

Summit Declaration of 2014 issued by Heads of State 


emcdonald on DSK9F6TC42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 135 IH 

and Government participating in the meeting of the 

North Atlantic Council; 

Whereas Article 3 of the North Atlantic Treaty states that, 

‘‘in order more effectively to achieve the objectives of this 

Treaty, the Parties, separately and jointly, by means of 

continuous and effective self-help and mutual aid, will 

maintain and develop their individual and collective capacity to resist armed attack.’’; 

Whereas member nations that meet or exceed the GDP commitment and member nations with a plan of action to 

move toward the GDP commitment are commended and 

encouraged; 

Whereas the aggressive actions of Russia against Ukraine 

challenge global freedom, security, and stability critical to 

the NATO Alliance; 

Whereas the instability in the Middle East and North Africa 

and the continued threat of global terrorism pose a 

threat to security and prosperity; 

Whereas emerging security challenges such as cyber-attacks 

threaten the resilience and integrity of NATO networks 

and infrastructure assets; and 

Whereas the resolute commitment of the United States to 

NATO is steadfast and the efforts of member nations 

that have met GDP commitments is applauded: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) calls on North Atlantic Treaty Organization 

3 (NATO) member countries to meet or exceed the 

4 two percent gross domestic product commitment to 

5 spending on defense; 


emcdonald on DSK9F6TC42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 135 IH 

1 (2) calls on NATO member countries to meet 

2 or exceed the 20 percent commitment to defense ex3 penditures on major equipment spending; and 

4 (3) reaffirms the United States longstanding 

5 and resolute commitment to NATO and the peace 

6 through strength it advances. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK9F6TC42PROD with BILLS
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22-6895

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

TARIK COEFIELD,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:93-cr-00339-LMB)

Submitted: December 20, 2022 Decided: December 27, 2022

Before NIEMEYER and QUATTLEBAUM Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit 

Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tarik Coefield, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 22-6895 Doc: 13 Filed: 12/27/2022 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Tarik Coefield appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. 

§ 3582(c)(1)(A) motion for compassionate release. We review a district court’s order 

granting or denying a compassionate release motion for abuse of discretion. United States 

v. Kibble, 992 F.3d 326, 329 (4th Cir.) (stating standard of review), cert. denied, 142 S. Ct. 

383 (2021). We have reviewed the record and conclude that the district court did not abuse 

its discretion in analyzing the relevant 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors. See United States v. 

High, 997 F.3d 181, 189 (4th Cir. 2021). We therefore affirm the district court’s order. 

We deny Coefield’s motion to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument because 

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court 

and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED

USCA4 Appeal: 22-6895 Doc: 13 Filed: 12/27/2022 Pg: 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         136,562
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               136,562
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 389,740
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          202,890
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        32,747
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   389,740
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  116,068
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (121,762)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (121,762)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (121,762)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (121,762)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.00)


</TABLE>
§ 745.110 Expedited review procedures for certain kinds of research involving no more than minimal risk, and for minor changes in approved research. ( a ) The Secretary of HHS has established, and published as a Notice in the Federal Register, a list of categories of research that may be reviewed by the IRB through an expedited review procedure. The Secretary will evaluate the list at least every 8 years and amend it, as appropriate, after consultation with other federal departments and agencies and after publication in the Federal Register for public comment. A copy of the list is available from the Office for Human Research Protections, HHS, or any successor office.
( b ) ( 1 ) An IRB may use the expedited review procedure to review the following: ( i ) Some or all of the research appearing on the list described in paragraph (a) of this section, unless the reviewer determines that the study involves more than minimal risk;
( ii ) Minor changes in previously approved research during the period for which approval is authorized; or
( iii ) Research for which limited IRB review is a condition of exemption under § 745.104(d)(2)(iii), (d)(3)(i)(C), and (d)(7) and (8).
( 2 ) Under an expedited review procedure, the review may be carried out by the IRB chairperson or by one or more experienced reviewers designated by the chairperson from among members of the IRB. In reviewing the research, the reviewers may exercise all of the authorities of the IRB except that the reviewers may not disapprove the research. A research activity may be disapproved only after review in accordance with the nonexpedited procedure set forth in § 745.108(b).
( c ) Each IRB that uses an expedited review procedure shall adopt a method for keeping all members advised of research proposals that have been approved under the procedure.
( d ) The department or agency head may restrict, suspend, terminate, or choose not to authorize an institution's or IRB's use of the expedited review procedure.
PGI Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation

PGI Part 252 - CLAUSES

PGI Part 253 - FORMS

Parent topic: PGI Subchapter H - CONTRACT MANAGEMENT
§ 710.24 Appointment of DOE Counsel. ( a ) Upon receipt from the individual of a written request for a hearing, a DOE attorney shall forthwith be assigned by the Manager to act as DOE Counsel.
( b ) DOE Counsel is authorized to consult directly with the individual if he/she is not represented by counsel, or with the individual's counsel or other representative if so represented, to clarify issues and reach stipulations with respect to testimony and contents of documents and physical evidence. Such stipulations shall be binding upon the individual and the DOE Counsel for the purposes of this part.
ASSIGNMENT OF CONTRACT



 Exhibit 10.13 
 ASSIGNMENT OF CONTRACT 
 THIS ASSIGNMENT (the “Assignment”) is made effective as of this
27th day of April, 2006, by and between APPLE SIX HOSPITALITY OWNERSHIP, INC., a Virginia corporation (the
“Assignor”), and APPLE SEVEN HOSPITALITY OWNERSHIP, INC., a Virginia corporation (the “Assignee”). 
 RECITALS

 A. The Assignor and Hospitality Ventures DMCY, LLC (“Seller”), have executed a Purchase Contract dated March 6, 2006
(the “Contract”) whereby Seller agreed to sell, and the Assignor agreed to purchase, certain real property located in Miami, Florida, and more particularly described in the Contract. 
 B. The Assignor now desires to assign its rights under the Contract to the Assignee. 
 WITNESSETH 
 FOR AND IN CONSIDERATION of the sum of Ten Dollars ($10.00) cash in
hand paid, other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows: 
 1. Assignment. The Assignor hereby assigns and conveys to Assignee all of its right, title and interest in, to and under the Contract. 
 2. Assumption. The Assignee hereby assumes and agrees to perform all of the Assignor’s obligations under the Contract. 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Assignment as of the day first above written.

  

			
	ASSIGNOR:
	
	 APPLE SIX HOSPITALITY OWNERSHIP, INC.,
 a
Virginia corporation

		
	By:	 	 /s/ Justin G. Knight

	Name:	 	Justin G. Knight
	Title:	 	President
	
	ASSIGNEE:
	
	APPLE SEVEN HOSPITALITY OWNERSHIP,
	INC., a Virginia corporation
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Justin G. Knight

	Name:	 	Justin G. Knight
	Title:	 	President
§ 75.29 Requirements for facilities, locations, and nuclear material outside facilities after termination from IAEA safeguards. ( a ) *Licensees of facilities.* A licensee of a facility shall submit an Inventory Change Report pursuant to §§ 75.6(c) and 75.31(a) following notification from the NRC that IAEA safeguards have been terminated as described in § 75.28.
( b ) *Licensees of locations.* A licensee of a location shall provide annual updates pursuant to § 75.11(c) following notification from the NRC that IAEA safeguards have been terminated as described in § 75.28.
( c ) *Possessors of nuclear material outside facilities.* A possessor of nuclear material outside facilities shall submit an Inventory Change Report pursuant to §§ 75.6(e) and 75.31(b) following notification from the NRC that IAEA safeguards have been terminated as described in § 75.28.
( d ) Nuclear material that has had IAEA safeguards terminated as described in § 75.28 is not subject to inspections by the IAEA.
IV 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 551 

Supporting the goals and ideals of the International Day of Non-Violence. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 2, 2017 

Ms. MENG (for herself, Ms. NORTON, Mr. EVANS, Mr. MCGOVERN, and Ms. 

JUDY CHU of California) submitted the following resolution; which was 

referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Supporting the goals and ideals of the International Day 

of Non-Violence. 

Whereas the United Nations General Assembly established 

the International Day of Non-Violence on June 15, 2007, 

to disseminate the message of non-violence, through 

means such as education and public awareness; 

Whereas, the United Nations General Assembly has stated 

that ‘‘non-violence, tolerance, full respect for all human 

rights and fundamental freedoms for all, democracy, development, mutual understanding and respect for diversity are interlinked and mutually reinforcing’’; 

Whereas the annual International Day of Non-Violence celebration date, October 2, was chosen to commemorate the 

birthday of Mohandas K. Gandhi, more commonly known 

as ‘‘Mahatma’’, which means ‘‘great soul’’; 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 551 IH 

Whereas Mahatma Gandhi was a world-renowned civil rights 

and spiritual leader, who experienced injustices early in 

life, and learned to embrace the principles of non-violence 

as a vehicle for social and political change; 

Whereas Mahatma Gandhi was influenced by religious teachings in Hinduism, Jainism, and Christianity in the development of his philosophy; 

Whereas Mahatma Gandhi was a major influence for Martin 

Luther King, Jr., whose emphasis on non-violence is 

credited with ushering in our Nation’s civil rights; and 

Whereas people around the world commemorate the International Day of Non-Violence by participating in volunteer projects as a way to give back to their communities: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) supports the goals and ideals of the Inter3 national Day of Non-Violence; and 

4 (2) encourages the people of the United States 

5 to observe the International Day of Non-Violence 

6 with appropriate ceremonies, programs, and activi7 ties. 

Æ 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                               5
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  the
Company's  consolidated financial statements for the fiscal quarter to March 31,
1999 as presented in the Company's  Form 10-QSB for such period and is qualified
by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                           0000764763
<NAME>                         Triangle Imaging Group, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                             1
<CURRENCY>                                             USD
       
<S>                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                         3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                  JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                    MAR-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                           1
<CASH>                                               59,328
<SECURITIES>                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     1,220,332
<ALLOWANCES>                                         96,187
<INVENTORY>                                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  1,325,837
<PP&E>                                              338,622
<DEPRECIATION>                                            0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    4,125,095
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             1,875,485
<BONDS>                                           2,985,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            14,143,791
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                                  0
<OTHER-SE>                                                0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      4,125,095
<SALES>                                           2,091,079
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  2,091,079
<CGS>                                             1,577,249
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       577,249
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   70,562
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      85,067
<INCOME-TAX>                                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  85,067
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                         85,067
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                           .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           .01
        

</TABLE>
#### § 800.203 Loan limits.

The Secretary shall not make a loan in excess of $50,000, or make aggregate loans to the same minority business enterprise, including its affiliates, in any Federal fiscal year in excess of $100,000. In addition, the Secretary shall not increase a loan to an amount which would cause the limits set forth in the previous sentence to be exceeded. Nothing in this regulation shall be interpreted to restrict the Secretary, in making the various determinations provided for in this regulation, from taking into account considerations relating to the Office of Minority Economic Impact loan program as a whole.
Editorial Note on Part 63
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 63 appear at 81 FR 86909, Dec. 2, 2016.

§ 63.10 Completeness and accuracy of information. ( a ) Information provided to the Commission by an applicant for a license or by a licensee, or information required by statute, or required by the Commission's regulations, orders, or license conditions to be maintained by the applicant or the licensee must be complete and accurate in all material respects.
( b ) The applicant or licensee shall notify the Commission of information identified by the applicant or licensee as having, for the regulated activity, a significant implication for public health and safety or common defense and security. An applicant or licensee violates this paragraph only if the applicant or licensee fails to notify the Commission of information that the applicant or licensee has identified as having a significant implication for public health and safety or common defense and security. Notification must be provided to the Director of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, within 2 working days of identifying the information. This requirement is not applicable to information that is already required to be provided to the Commission by other reporting or updating requirements.
PGI 235.010 Scientific and technical reports.

(b) The Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC) is responsible for collecting all scientific or

technological observations, findings, recommendations, and results derived from DoD endeavors,

including both in-house and contracted efforts. The DTIC has eligibility and registration

requirements for use of its services. Requests for eligibility and registration information should be

addressed to DTIC-BC Registration, 8725 John J. Kingman Road, Fort Belvoir, VA 22060-6218, or

may be obtained at http://www.dtic.mil.

Parent topic: PGI Part 235 - RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CONTRACTING
#### In the Matter of Skidmore College et al., Respondents, v. Newton Cline et al., Constituting the Town Board of the Town of Greenfield, Appellants.

Judgment affirmed, without costs, on the opinion of Crangle, J., at Special Term (58 Misc 2d 582). Gibson, P. J., Staley, Jr., Cooke and Greenblott, JJ., concur; Aulisi, J. not voting.