alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

WILLIAM RAINER,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

D. CHAPMAN; et al.,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 08-17128

D.C. No. 1:04-cv-05343-OWWDLB

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

Oliver W. Wanger, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 12, 2013** 

Before: PREGERSON, REINHARDT, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.

Former California state prisoner William Rainer appeals pro se from the

district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging due

process violations. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de

FILED

MAR 22 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 08-17128

novo a dismissal for failure to state a claim under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915A and

1915(e)(2). Resnick v. Hayes, 213 F.3d 443, 447 (9th Cir. 2000); Barren v.

Harrington, 152 F.3d 1193, 1194 (9th Cir. 1998) (order). We affirm. 

The district court properly dismissed Rainer’s due process claims based on

his removal from his work assignment and transfer from the facility where his job

was located because these allegations did not give rise to a constitutionally

protected liberty or property interest. See Sandin v. Conner, 515 U.S. 472, 484

(1995) (requiring “atypical and significant hardship on the inmate in relation to the

ordinary incidents of prison life” or a restraint that exceeds the prisoner’s sentence

in “an unexpected manner” to state a liberty interest); Walker v. Gomez, 370 F.3d

969, 973 (9th Cir. 2004) (there is no liberty or property interest in prison

employment).

The district court properly dismissed Rainer’s due process claim based on

defendants’ processing of Rainer’s administrative grievances because prisoners do

not have a protected liberty interest in a particular grievance procedure. See

Ramirez v. Galaza, 334 F.3d 850, 860 (9th Cir. 2003).

AFFIRMED.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1027 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
H. Res. 1027

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                         July 26, 2018.
    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider the conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 5515) to authorize 
appropriations for fiscal year 2019 for military activities of the Department of 
Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department 
of Energy, to prescribe military personnel strengths for such fiscal year, and 
for other purposes. All points of order against the conference report and 
against its consideration are waived. The conference report shall be considered 
as read. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the conference 
report to its adoption without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of 
debate; and (2) one motion to recommit if applicable.
    Sec. 2.  The Committee on Appropriations may, at any time before 3 p.m. on 
Thursday, August 2, 2018, file privileged reports to accompany measures making 
appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2019.
    Sec. 3.  House Resolution 1020 is laid on the table.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
#### LANCASTER SEA BEACH IMPROVEMENT CO., Appellant v. CITY OF NEW YORK, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appell*1126ate Division, Second Department.

June 11, 1914.)

Action by the Lancaster Sea Beach Improvement Company against the City of New York.

No opinion. Motion granted in part, Settle order before Mr. Justice Stapleton. See, also, 147 N. Y. Supp. 1122.
IV 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 609 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives in support of providing 

fair and up-to-date teaching in United States secondary schools of the 

developments of modern day Russia. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 14, 2005 

Mr. NADLER submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Education and the Workforce 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives in 

support of providing fair and up-to-date teaching in 

United States secondary schools of the developments of 

modern day Russia. 

Whereas the events of the past 15 years, including the end 

of the Cold War and the breakup of the former Soviet 

Union, have fundamentally changed the nature of Russian society and politics, as well as the relationship of the 

Russian Federation to the United States; 

Whereas the United States prides itself on the importance of 

its school system and its teachers in providing a wide 

breadth of current knowledge to its students; 
2 

•HRES 609 IH 

Whereas New York City is home to more than 240,000 people of Russian descent, with Brighton Beach having one 

of the largest Russian communities in the United States; 

Whereas a 2004 study indicates that many of the history 

textbooks used in New York City high schools lack adequate coverage of Russian history and only teach one 

perspective of Russian history; 

Whereas these errors of omission are predominantly evident 

in the post-Communist era coverage of Russia, specifically with little or no coverage of President Yeltsin and 

President Putin and often times with no mention of the 

democratic, economic, and social reforms of Russia; and 

Whereas it is in the best interests of United States students 

to advance their understanding of Russian history: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) applauds the efforts of officials of public 

3 and private schools in the United States who are 

4 trying to improve the history curriculum in United 

5 States secondary schools; 

6 (2) calls on school officials to reexamine their 

7 history curriculum in order to ensure fair and up-to8 date teaching of the developments of modern day 

9 Russia; and 

10 (3) calls on publishers of history textbooks to 

11 include more information and additional points of 

12 view regarding Russian history in new versions of 
3 

•HRES 609 IH 

1 textbooks or make such information available as 

2 supplementary materials. 

Æ
(logo) GREYSTONE

 

C-III ASSET MANAGEMENT LLCd/b/a

GREYSTONE SPECIAL SERVICING

5221 N. O’Connor Blvd., Suite800

Irving, Texas 75039

Phone: 972-868-5300

Fax: 972-868-5303

** **

**OFFICER’S CERTIFICATE**

**C-III Asset Management LLC**

 

The undersigned, Barry Davis,Vice President of C-III Asset Management LLC, the current Special Servicerunder that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of March 1, 2013,relating to the **J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Trust 2013-C10,Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2013-C10** (the“Pooling and Servicing Agreement”), hereby certifies as follows:

 

1.  a review of theactivities of the Special Servicer and of its performance under the Pooling andServicing Agreement during the calendar year 2019 (the “Reporting Period”) hasbeen made under the undersigned’s supervision;

 

2.  to the best of theundersigned’s knowledge, based on such review, the Special Servicer hasfulfilled all its obligations under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement in allmaterial respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

Capitalized terms nototherwise defined herein shall have the meanings given them in the Pooling andServicing Agreement.

 

**IN WITNESS WHEREOF**, as of the 1st day of March, 2020, I have hereuntosigned my name.

 

/s/ Barry Davis

**Barry Davis**, Vice President
§ 60.72 Construction records. ( a ) DOE shall maintain records of construction of the geologic repository operations area in a manner that ensures their useability for future generations in accordance with § 60.51(a)(2).
( b ) The records required under paragraph (a) shall include at least the following: ( 1 ) Surveys of the underground facility excavations, shafts, and boreholes referenced to readily identifiable surface features or monuments;
( 2 ) A description of the materials encountered;
( 3 ) Geologic maps and geologic cross sections;
( 4 ) Locations and amount of seepage;
( 5 ) Details of equipment, methods, progress, and sequence of work;
( 6 ) Construction problems;
( 7 ) Anomalous conditions encountered;
( 8 ) Instrument locations, readings, and analysis;
( 9 ) Location and description of structural support systems;
( 10 ) Location and description of dewatering systems; and
( 11 ) Details, methods of emplacement, and location of seals used.
[48 FR 28222, June 21, 1983, as amended at 53 FR 19251, May 27, 1988]
Exhibit 32



                        President's Written Certification
                             Of Financial Statements
                       Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Statute 1350



     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Statute 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity
as president of Ridgefield Acquisition Corp. (the "Company") that

     (a)  the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-QSB for the period
          ended June 30, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section
          13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

     (b)  the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end
          of such period and the results of operations of the Company for such
          period.


Dated: August 9, 2005


                                            /s/ Steven N. Bronson
                                            ----------------------------------
                                            Steven N. Bronson, President
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A25A0266. STEVEN FETTEROLF v. THE STATE.

In March 2022, Steven Fetterolf pled guilty to aggravated assault and other

crimes, and he received a probated sentence. In March 2024, the trial court revoked

Fetterolf’s probation upon finding that he had admitted to violating his conditions of

probation. Fetterolf filed this direct appeal, but we lack jurisdiction.

An appeal from a probation revocation order must be made by application for

discretionary appeal. See OCGA§ 5-6-35 (a) (5).“Compliance with the discretionary

appeals procedure is jurisdictional.”Smoak v.Dept.of HumanResources, 221Ga.App.

257, 257 (471 SE2d 60) (1996). Fetterolf’s failure to follow the required procedure

deprives us of jurisdiction over this direct appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office,Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

September 04, 2024

09/04/2024
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk March 4, 2013

h 0225 

# Order

March 4, 2013

146108

MERLO CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v SC: 146108

COA: 304184

Wayne CC: 10

- 000814

- CK

CITIZENS INSURANCE COMPANY OF

AMERICA,

Defendant

- Appellee,

and

MADIGAN INSURANCE AGENCY, INC.,

d/b/a MADIGAN PINGATORE INSURANCE

SERVICES,

Defendant.

______________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 25, 2012

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

V IVIAN O

, J., not participating.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 612 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 612

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                     December 16, 2005.
Whereas the Iraqi election of December 15, 2005, the first to take place under 
        the newly ratified Iraqi Constitution, represented a crucial success in 
        the establishment of a democratic, constitutional order in Iraq; and
Whereas Iraqis, who by the millions defied terrorist threats to vote, were 
        protected by Iraqi security forces with the help of United States and 
        Coalition forces: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved,  That--
            (1) the House of Representatives is committed to achieving victory 
        in Iraq;
            (2) the Iraqi election of December 15, 2005, was a crucial victory 
        for the Iraqi people and Iraq's new democracy, and a defeat for the 
        terrorists who seek to destroy that democracy;
            (3) the House of Representatives encourages all Americans to express 
        solidarity with the Iraqi people as they take another step toward their 
        goal of a free, open, and democratic society;
            (4) the successful Iraqi election of December 15, 2005, required the 
        presence of United States Armed Forces, United States-trained Iraqi 
        forces, and Coalition forces;
            (5) the continued presence of United States Armed Forces in Iraq 
        will be required only until Iraqi forces can stand up so our forces can 
        stand down, and no longer than is required for that purpose;
            (6) setting an artificial timetable for the withdrawal of United 
        States Armed Forces from Iraq, or immediately terminating their 
        deployment in Iraq and redeploying them elsewhere in the region, is 
        fundamentally inconsistent with achieving victory in Iraq;
            (7) the House of Representatives recognizes and honors the 
        tremendous sacrifices made by the members of the United States Armed 
        Forces and their families, along with the members of Iraqi and Coalition 
        forces; and
            (8) the House of Representatives has unshakable confidence that, 
        with the support of the American people and the Congress, United States 
        Armed Forces, along with Iraqi and Coalition forces, shall achieve 
        victory in Iraq.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Editorial Note on Part 35
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 35 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

§ 35.315 Safety precautions. ( a ) For each patient or human research subject who cannot be released under § 35.75, a licensee shall— ( 1 ) Quarter the patient or the human research subject either in— ( i ) A private room with a private sanitary facility; or
( ii ) A room, with a private sanitary facility, with another individual who also has received therapy with unsealed byproduct material and who also cannot be released under § 35.75;
( 2 ) Visibly post the patient's or the human research subject's room with a “Radioactive Materials” sign.
( 3 ) Note on the door or in the patient's or human research subject's chart where and how long visitors may stay in the patient's or the human research subject's room; and
( 4 ) Either monitor material and items removed from the patient's or the human research subject's room to determine that their radioactivity cannot be distinguished from the natural background radiation level with a radiation detection survey instrument set on its most sensitive scale and with no interposed shielding, or handle the material and items as radioactive waste.
( b ) A licensee shall notify the Radiation Safety Officer, or his or her designee, and an authorized user as soon as possible if the patient or human research subject has a medical emergency or dies.
[67 FR 20370, Apr. 24, 2002, as amended at 68 FR 19325, Apr. 21, 2003]
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

TAURIC GRIGGS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D18-3751

[March 14, 2019]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Bernard I. Bober, 

Judge; L.T. Case No. 97-3672CF10A.

Tauric Griggs, Okeechobee, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GROSS, CONNER and FORST, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 855 

To amend title 31, United States Code, to require the Secretary of the 

Treasury to provide for the purchase of paper United States savings 

bonds with tax refunds. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 3, 2017 

Mr. CARTWRIGHT (for himself, Mr. CUMMINGS, Mr. ELLISON, Ms. JENKINS

of Kansas, Mr. NEAL, Ms. TSONGAS, Mr. LIPINSKI, and Ms. SCHAKOWSKY) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend title 31, United States Code, to require the Secretary of the Treasury to provide for the purchase of 

paper United States savings bonds with tax refunds. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Save Access to a Valu5 able Investment Needed to Generate Savings Act of 2017’’ 

6 or the ‘‘SAVINGS Act’’. 


smartinez on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 855 IH

1 SEC. 2. PURCHASE PAPER UNITED STATES SAVINGS BONDS 

2 WITH TAX REFUND. 

3 Section 3106 of title 31, United States Code, is 

4 amended by adding at the end the following: 

5 ‘‘(d) The Secretary shall— 

6 ‘‘(1) provide an option on the individual return 

7 of tax under subtitle A of the Internal Revenue Code 

8 of 1986 to use a portion or all of a refund of over9 payment of such tax to purchase United States sav10 ings bonds in paper form for the taxpayer or any in11 dividual designated by the taxpayer; or 

12 ‘‘(2) provide an option on such return of tax 

13 that— 

14 ‘‘(A) allows for the gifting of United States 

15 savings bonds to any individual designated by 

16 the taxpayer; and 

17 ‘‘(B) serves the unbanked (within the 

18 meaning of section 49 of the Federal Deposit 

19 Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 1831z)) and individ20 uals who lack access to the Internet.’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
# Update on the Discontinuation of FHFA's Monthly Interest Rate Survey (MIRS)

On May 29, 2019, FHFA published its final Monthly Interest Rate Survey (MIRS), due to dwindling participation by financial institutions. MIRS had provided information on a monthly basis on interest rates, loan terms, and house prices by property type (all, new, previously occupied); by loan type (fixed- or adjustable-rate), and by lender type (savings associations, mortgage companies, commercial banks and savings banks); as well as information on 15-year and 30-year, fixed-rate loans. Additionally, MIRS provided quarterly information on conventional loans by major metropolitan area and by Federal Home Loan Bank district, and was used to compile FHFA’s monthly adjustable-rate mortgage index entitled the “National Average Contract Mortgage Rate for the Purchase of Previously Occupied Homes by Combined Lenders,” also known as the ARM Index.

As some banks use the ARM Index as the basis for adjusting the interest rates on adjustable-rate mortgages, FHFA created and designated as the replacement for the ARM Index a version of Freddie Mac’s 30-year Primary Mortgage Market Survey® (PMMS®) that adjusts for differences between the two. This new index is called “MIRS Transition Index” and will be published on fhfa.gov on the final Thursday of every month. June 2019 was the first MIRS Transition index value to be published. The MIRS Transition index is intended to be used in lieu of the discontinued index for currently outstanding loans, and not as a reference rate on newly-originated adjustable-rate mortgages. The MIRS Transition Index was briefly referred to as PMMS+. It is not a replacement for PMMS.

 

## MIRS Transition Index

----

Historical MIRS Transition Index

​​ 

## National Average Contract Mortgage Rate

----

The data, tabulated and published as described above, is used to compile FHFA’s monthly adjustable-rate mortgage index entitled the “National Average Contract Mortgage Rate for the Purchase of Previously Occupied Homes by Combined Lenders.”  This index is the successor to the index previously maintained by the former Federal Home Loan Bank Board.   

Historical National Average Contract Mortgage Rate Index Values

 

## MIRS Microdata File

----

MIRS Public Use File (CSV)

MIRS Public Use File Documentation

  

## MIRS Historical Summary Tables

----

The following tables present historical summary data prior to 2008 containing Rates and Terms on Conventional Single-Family Non-farm Mortgage Loans. This survey is the nation's most comprehensive source of information on conventional mortgage rates and terms.

​​​​
§ 600.234 Copyrights. The Federal awarding agency reserves a royalty-free, nonexclusive, and irrevocable license to reproduce, publish or otherwise use, and to authorize others to use, for Federal Government purposes: ( a ) The copyright in any work developed under a grant, subgrant, or contract under a grant or subgrant; and
( b ) Any rights of copyright to which a grantee, subgrantee or a contractor purchases ownership with grant support.