alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION

SOUTHEASTERN BOLL WEEVIL )

ERADICATION FOUNDATION, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

v. ) 2:06cv756-MHT

) 

BOLL WEEVIL ERADICATION )

FOUNDATION OF GEORGIA, )

INC., and TOMMY IRVIN, in )

his capacity as Trustee )

of Boll Weevil Eradication )

Foundation of Georgia, )

Inc., )

)

Defendants. )

ORDER

It is ORDERED that the motion to amend answer (doc.

no. 32) is granted. The court assumes that the other

parties have no objection to the allowance of the

amendment; however, if they do, they must file the

objection within seven days from the date of this order.

DONE, this the 10th day of May, 2007.

 /s/ Myron H. Thompson 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00756-MHT-WC Document 33 Filed 05/10/2007 Page 1 of 1
·-": -· U.S.Deportmentof Transportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 Officeofthe Secretary ofTransportation ·

The Hqnorable.Kim Reynolds Lieutenant Governor ofIowa State Capitol Des Moines, IA 50319 

## JUL 52012

Dear Lieutenant Governor Reynolds: Thank you for your letter supporting thep,roposal submitted by Sioux Gateway Airport for a grant under the U.S. Department ofTransportation's Small Community Air Service Development Program. The Small Community Air ServiceI>evelopment Program was established to help smaller communities address air service de:fidendes;particularly issues related to high airfares or insufficient service. Underthe statute, the Department may make a maximum of40 grant awards each year, althoughno more than-4 awards may be to communities in the same State. In ot:der to provide communities**with~'Iatitude.in** developing solutions to their air·service · deficiencies, the statute provides flexibility in the types ofprojects that can be funded. On May 15, the Department issued an orderrequesting that communities interested in receiving a grant this year file their-applications by June 11. As these grant requests are pending before the Department, I cannot comment on the merits ofany particular proposal. I assure you that the Department will give full and fair consideration to all proposals that have been properly filed. As is ournormai practice, I am placing a copy ofyour letter and this response in Docket DOT-OST-2012-0069 as a contact outside the record ofthis matter. I appreciate your interest in this prograni. Sincerely yours,

# -~1\f:~~ 

# ;, a

Aloha Ley Associate Director Small Community ProgramTERRY E. BRANS'i'AD GOVERNOR

Aloha Ley May 3H, 2012

Associate Director, SmallCommunity Program Ofiice ofAviation Analysis 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE W86-310 Washington, DC 20590 Dear Ms. Ley, KIM R.-:vhJOl.D!; LT. GOVERNOR

I strong!)' supportthe air service,proposal det.ailed intheCity ofSioux,Citis Small Community Air Service Development Program grant application. In April2012, American Airlines became the subsidized Essential Air Service catTier for the Sioux Gateway Airp_ort by initiating service to Chicago O'Hare Intemati.onal Airport. I fully suppmi the need for Essential Air Service at the Sioux Gateway Airport, and this Small Community Air Service Development Program grant will be an import<mt support mechanism .iorthe air service to help ensure the successful transition to American Airlines and service to
·· Chicago O'Hare.

It is my hope that you will give the City ofSioux City's application full consideration and award the funds requested to ensurethe success ofAmerican Airlines in the Sioux City market
Sincerely,

# ~~- Kim Reynolcrs-J Lieutenant Governor oflowa

STI'.TE •::APITOL DES MOII•!ES, IOWA 50319 515.2.81.5211 FAX 515.725.3527 WW\1\/.GOVEP.I·IOR.IOW/A.GOV
#### Aris Steamship Co., Ltd., Respondent, v. Worldwide Carriers, Ltd., et al., Respondents, and Marine Midland Grace Trust Company of New York, Appellant.

Order, entered February 14, 1969, unanimously reversed and vacated on the law and the facts but with $30 costs and disbursements to be paid by appellant garnishee, and motion to hold garnishee in contempt denied, without prejudice to renewal, on condition, however, that the garnishee, by its officers and employees having knowledge of the facts, submit itself to examination to be conducted before Hon. Samuel Coleman, who is hereby appointed Referee for such purpose with power to rule upon and determine all objections and questions concerning the relevancy, competency and materiality of questions asked and testimony rendered on the examination. The garnishee is hereby directed to appear for such examination at such times and places as may be designated by the Referee and shall submit to an examination as to all information possessed by it regarding any property in which the defendant (Worldwide Carriers, Ltd.) has an interest including any account or property in its custody in which it has reason to believe such defendant has an interest and any debts owing to it by the garnishee. (See CPLR 6214, subd. [b]; 6219, 6220.) On the completion of the examination, the Referee shall report his proceedings to Special Term, together with his fees and the costs of the reference, and the garnishee shall .pay such fees and costs. Concur — Stevens, P. J., Eager, Capozzoli, Nunez and 'Steuer, JJ.
Letter Agreement dated July 26, 2006 with William R. Nuti



 Exhibit 10.4 
 

 
  

  

			
		  	 1700 S. Patterson Boulevard

		  	 Dayton, OH 45479-0001


 July 26, 2006 
 Mr. William R. Nuti 
 NCR Corporation 
 1700 South Patterson Boulevard 
 Dayton, OH 45479 
 Dear Mr. Nuti: 
 This will confirm that the paragraph captioned “Relocation” of the
letter agreement between us dated July 29, 2005 is amended to: (a) delete the first four sentences and the first six words of the fifth sentence; (b) to substitute “NCR” for the words “the Company” at the beginning
of the fifth sentence as amended by clause (a) hereof; and (c) to delete the words beginning with “from” and ending with “(the Relocation Period)” in clause (ii) of the fifth sentence. In addition, the
paragraph captioned “Travel Expenses and Benefits” of such letter agreement is amended to: (w) insert the words “, subject to the terms of the prior paragraph,” after the first use of the word “and” in the
first sentence of such paragraph; (x) delete the second sentence and the first four words of the third sentence of such paragraph; (y) capitalize the first use of the word “you” in the third sentence; and (z) delete the
words following the second semicolon in the third sentence of such paragraph. 
  

	
	Sincerely,
	
	NCR Corporation
	
	 /s/ Linda Fayne Levinson

	Linda Fayne Levinson
	Chair, NCR Compensation and Human Resource Committee


  

	
	Agreed and accepted
	
	This 26th day of July 2006
	
	 /s/ William R. Nuti

	William R. Nuti
#### § 81.4 Interpretations.

Except as specifically authorized by the Commission in writing and by § 81.53, no interpretation of the meaning of the regulations in this part by an officer or employee of the Commission other than a written interpretation by the General Counsel will be recognized to be binding upon the Commission.
223 So.2d 870

#### The CITY OF NATCHITOCHES et al. v. The STATE of Louisiana et al.

No. 49916.

June 27, 1969.

In re: The City of Natchitoches applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Natchitoches. 221 So.2d 534.

The application is denied. Although the ruling of the Court of Appeal, that the State of Louisiana may he sued herein without its consent, is palpably erroneous (see Cobb v. Louisiana Board of Institutions, 229 La. 1, 85 So.2d 10, and Weinstein, Bronfin & Heller v. LeBlanc, 249 La. 936, 192 So.2d 130, and the authorities cited in those matters), the rulings complained of in this application are correct.

' HAMLIN, J., is of the view that the decision of the Court of Appeal is correct.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

In the Matter of : No. 127 DB 2023 (No. 71 RST 2023)

:

ALISON CHASE VANNOY : Attorney Registration No. 88372

:

PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT :

FROM INACTIVE STATUS : (Out of State)

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 26th day of October, 2023, the Report and Recommendation of 

Disciplinary Board Member dated October 12, 2023, is approved and it is ORDERED that 

ALISON CHASE VANNOY, who has been on Inactive Status, has demonstrated that she 

has the moral qualifications, competency, and learning in law required for admission to 

practice in the Commonwealth, shall be and is, hereby reinstated to active status as a 

member of the Bar of this Commonwealth. The expenses incurred by the Board in the 

investigation and processing of this matter shall be paid by the Petitioner.
#### § 820.60 Purpose and scope.

This subpart provides for exemption relief from provisions of DOE Nuclear Safety Requirements at nuclear facilities.
#### Dynamic Classics, Ltd., Respondent, v. Snyder Manufacturing Company, Inc., et al., Appellants.

Order entered May 14, 1969, unanimously modified, on the law and the facts, so ás to delete, effective as of the date of the order entered hereon, the provisions of paragraph 3 thereof enjoining defendanfcs-appellants from selling any exercise wheel and as so modified, affirmed, without costs or disbursements. Defendants may not be enjoined from copying and selling an unpatented article, in the absence of trade-mark infringement or unfair competition. *(Sears, Roebuck & Co.*v. *Stiffel Co.,*376 U. S. 225, 231; *Compco Corp.*v. *Day-Brite Lighting,*376 U. S. 234, 238.) In the circumstances of this case the interests of justice would be served by an early trial. Accordingly, the calendar clerk is directed to place this cause on the appropriate calendar for immediate trial upon payment by plaintiff of the appropriate fee. Concur — Eager, J. P., Capozzoli, Tilzer, Markewich and Nunez, JJ.
United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois 60604

Submitted August 12, 2009

Decided August 12, 2009

Before

FRANK H. EASTERBROOK, Chief Judge

    MICHAEL S. KANNE, Circuit Judge

ILANA DIAMOND ROVNER, Circuit Judge

No. 09‐1189

MARY JANE MURRAY,

Plaintiff‐Appellant,

v.

MILWAUKEE COUNTY, et al.,

Defendants‐Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District

Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin.

No. 08‐C‐1072

Rudolph T. Randa,

Chief Judge.

O R D E R

Mary Jane Murray appeals from the dismissal of her civil‐rights complaint on the

ground that it fails to state a claim.  We affirm the judgment.

The guardianship of Murray’s developmentally disabled daughter, Mary Kate

Murray (“Mary Kate”), is at the center of this lawsuit and many other suits that Murray has

filed over the years in state and federal court.  Mary Kate has had several different

guardians since 1984, including Murray’s sister and two of Murray’s former coworkers.

Most recently, in 1999, when Mary Kate was 38 years old, a Wisconsin state court appointed

ARC of Greater Milwaukee, Inc., an organization serving the disabled, to serve as Mary

Kate’s guardian.  In her present complaint, Murray claims that Milwaukee County, Mary

Kate’s former guardians, and ARC violated her and her daughter’s constitutional rights.

Murray moved to proceed in forma pauperis, see 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a), but the district court

NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION

To be cited only in accordance with

Fed. R. App. P. 32.1
No. 09‐1189 Page 2

concluded that the complaint fails to state a claim and dismissed the suit, see id. § 1915(e)(2).

On appeal Murray argues that the district court’s dismissal was in error and repeats many

of the allegations from her complaint.

As a threshold matter we note that Murray is not authorized to bring a civil‐rights

suit on behalf of Mary Kate. Only ARC, Mary Kate’s legally appointed guardian, may bring

suit on her behalf, and ARC may do so only with the assistance of counsel.  See Struck v.

Cook County Pub. Guardian, 508 F.3d 858, 859 (7th Cir. 2007); Malone v. Nielson, 474 F.3d 934,

937 (7th Cir. 2007); Navin v. Park Ridge Sch. Dist., 270 F.3d 1147, 1149 (7th Cir. 2001).

Murray’s claims made on behalf of her daughter, therefore, were not properly before the

district court.  Murray’s own claim, moreover, is limited to the contention that she would be

the best guardian for Mary Kate and yet the defendants have prevented her from serving in

that capacity.  But the selection of an appropriate guardian raises no federal constitutional

issue; any concern Murray has about Mary Kate’s guardianship must be addressed to the

state court where the guardianship determination was made.  See Struck, 508 F.3d at 859.

AFFIRMED.
PGI 241.202 Procedures.

(2)(A) Do not use the connection charge provisions for the installation of Government-owned

distribution lines and facilities. The acquisition of such facilities must be authorized by legislation

and accomplished in accordance with FAR Part 36. Also, do not use the connection charge provisions

for the installation of new facilities related to the supplier's production and general “backbone”

system unless authorized by legislation.

(B) Construction labor standards ordinarily do not apply to construction accomplished under the

connection charge provisions of this part. However, if installation includes construction of a public

building or public work as defined in FAR 36.102, construction labor standards may apply.

Parent topic: PGI 241.2 - ACQUIRING UTILITY SERVICES
§ 719.12 What information must be included in the Legal Management Plan? The Legal Management Plan must include the following items: ( a ) A description of the contractor's in-house counsel resources at the time the Legal Management Plan is submitted, including areas of expertise and an explanation of the types of matters expected to be handled in-house.
( b ) A description of the legal matters that may necessitate engagement of retained legal counsel.
( c ) A description of the factors the contractor will consider in determining whether to handle a particular matter utilizing retained legal counsel.
( d ) An outline of the factors the contractor must consider in selecting retained legal counsel, including: ( 1 ) Cost;
( 2 ) Past performance of previously retained counsel;
( 3 ) Particular expertise in a specific area of the law;
( 4 ) Familiarity with the Department's activity at the particular site and the prevalent issues associated with facility history and current operations;
( 5 ) Location of retained legal counsel relative to: ( i ) The site involved in the matter,
( ii ) Any forum in which the matter will be processed, and
( iii ) The location where a significant portion of the work will be performed;
( 6 ) Experience as an advocate in alternative dispute resolution procedures such as mediation;
( 7 ) Actual or potential conflicts of interest; and
( 8 ) The means and rate of compensation (e.g., hourly billing, fixed fee, blended fees).
( e ) A description of the system that the contractor will use to review each matter in litigation to determine whether and when alternative dispute resolution is appropriate.
( f ) A description of the role of in-house counsel in cost management.
( g ) A description of the contractor's process for review and approval of invoices for legal costs.
( h ) A description of the contractor's strategy for interaction with, and supervision of, retained legal counsel.
( i ) A description of the procedures the contractor will employ in order to seek timely approval from Department Counsel to settle any legal matters as required by § 719.34 of this part;
( j ) A description of the contractor's strategy for keeping Department Counsel apprised of all legal matters covered by this part (e.g., regularly scheduled meetings and written communications).
§ 7.15 Procedures for closing an NRC advisory committee meeting. ( a ) To close all or part of a meeting of an NRC advisory committee, the committee shall submit a written request for closure to the General Counsel, citing specific exemptions listed in the Government in the Sunshine Act (5 U.S.C. 552b), as implemented by 10 CFR 9.104, that justify the closure. The request shall provide the General Counsel sufficient time for review in order to make a determination prior to publication of the meeting notice pursuant to § 7.12.
( b ) If the General Counsel finds that the request for closure is consistent with the provisions of the Government in the Sunshine Act and this part, a determination shall be issued in writing that all or part of the meeting will be closed. The determination shall include a statement of the reasons for the closing, citing the applicable exemptions in the Government in the Sunshine Act (as implemented by 10 CFR 9.104).
( c ) Except when the President or designee determines in writing that no notice should be published for reasons of national security, the Secretary of the Commission shall make a copy of the determination to close all or part of an NRC advisory committee meeting available to the public upon request. If such a determination has been issued, the meeting notice published in the Federal Register should comply with the provisions of § 7.12 applicable to closed meetings.
[67 FR 79842, Dec. 31, 2002]
H. Res. 22 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

January 5, 2017. 

Resolved, That at any time after adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XVIII, 

declare the House resolved into the Committee of the Whole 

House on the state of the Union for consideration of the bill 

(H.R. 26) to amend chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, 

to provide that major rules of the executive branch shall have 

no force or effect unless a joint resolution of approval is enacted into law. The first reading of the bill shall be dispensed 

with. All points of order against consideration of the bill are 

waived. General debate shall be confined to the bill and shall 

not exceed one hour equally divided and controlled by the Majority Leader and the Minority Leader or their respective designees. After general debate the bill shall be considered for 

amendment under the five-minute rule. The bill shall be considered as read. All points of order against provisions in the 

bill are waived. No amendment to the bill shall be in order 

except those printed in the report of the Committee on Rules 

accompanying this resolution. Each such amendment may be 
2 

•HRES 22 EH 

offered only in the order printed in the report, may be offered 

only by a Member designated in the report, shall be considered as read, shall be debatable for the time specified in the 

report equally divided and controlled by the proponent and an 

opponent, shall not be subject to amendment, and shall not 

be subject to a demand for division of the question in the 

House or in the Committee of the Whole. All points of order 

against such amendments are waived. At the conclusion of 

consideration of the bill for amendment the Committee shall 

rise and report the bill to the House with such amendments 

as may have been adopted. The previous question shall be 

considered as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to 

final passage without intervening motion except one motion 

to recommit with or without instructions. 

SEC. 2. Upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in 

order without intervention of any point of order to consider 

in the House the resolution (H. Res. 11) objecting to United 

Nations Security Council Resolution 2334 as an obstacle to 

Israeli-Palestinian peace, and for other purposes. The resolution shall be considered as read. The previous question shall 

be considered as ordered on the resolution and preamble to 

adoption without intervening motion or demand for division 

of the question except one hour of debate equally divided and 
3 

•HRES 22 EH 

controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of the 

Committee on Foreign Affairs. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 472 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 472

  Recognizing the commencement of Ramadan, the Islamic holy month of 
  fasting and spiritual renewal, and commending Muslims in the United 
            States and throughout the world for their faith.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 29, 2005

Ms. Eddie Bernice Johnson of Texas (for herself, Mr. Meeks of New York, 
 Mr. Honda, Mr. Lantos, Mr. Conyers, Mrs. Jones of Ohio, Mr. Grijalva, 
  Mr. Rothman, Ms. McCollum of Minnesota, Mr. Burton of Indiana, Ms. 
 Berkley, Mr. Holt, Ms. Jackson-Lee of Texas, Mr. Dingell, Mr. Filner, 
Mr. Abercrombie, Mr. Serrano, Ms. Schakowsky, Ms. Lee, Mr. Feeney, Mr. 
 Hinchey, and Mr. Ackerman) submitted the following resolution; which 
        was referred to the Committee on International Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Recognizing the commencement of Ramadan, the Islamic holy month of 
  fasting and spiritual renewal, and commending Muslims in the United 
            States and throughout the world for their faith.

Whereas since the terrorist attacks on the United States on September 11, 2001, 
        threats and incidents of violence have been directed at law-abiding, 
        patriotic Americans of African, Arab, and South Asian descent, 
        particularly members of the Islamic faith;
Whereas on September 14, 2001, the House of Representatives passed a concurrent 
        resolution condemning bigotry and violence against Arab-Americans, 
        American Muslims, and Americans from South Asia in the wake of the 
        terrorist attacks in New York, New York, and Washington, D.C.;
Whereas it is estimated that there are approximately 1,500,000,000 Muslims 
        worldwide;
Whereas Ramadan is the holy month of fasting and spiritual renewal for Muslims 
        worldwide, and is the 9th month of the Muslim calendar year; and
Whereas the observance of the Islamic holy month of Ramadan commences at dusk on 
        October 4, 2005, and continues for one lunar month: Now, therefore, be 
        it
    Resolved, That--
            (1) during this time of conflict, in order to demonstrate 
        solidarity with and support for members of the community of 
        Islam in the United States and throughout the world, the House 
        of Representatives recognizes the Islamic faith as one of the 
        great religions of the world; and
            (2) in observance of and out of respect for the 
        commencement of Ramadan, the Islamic holy month of fasting and 
        spiritual renewal, the House of Representatives acknowledges 
        the onset of Ramadan and expresses its deepest respect to 
        Muslims in the United States and throughout the world on this 
        significant occasion.
                                 <all>
```