alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 995 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 995

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
    To direct the Secretary of Agriculture and the Secretary of the 
          Interior to modernize terms in certain regulations.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``21st Century Respect Act''.

SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS TO REGULATIONS REQUIRED.

    (a) Secretary of Agriculture.--The Secretary of Agriculture shall 
amend section 1901.202 of title 7, Code of Federal Regulations, for 
purposes of--
            (1) replacing the reference to the term ``Negro or Black'' 
        with ``Black or African American'';
            (2) replacing the reference to the term ``Spanish Surname'' 
        with ``Hispanic''; and
            (3) replacing the reference to the term ``Oriental'' with 
        ``Asian American or Pacific Islander''.
    (b) Secretary of the Interior.--The Secretary of the Interior shall 
amend section 906.2 of title 36, Code of Federal Regulations, for 
purposes of--
            (1) replacing the references to the term ``Negro'' with 
        ``Black or African American'';
            (2) replacing the definition of ``Negro'' with the 
        definition of ``Black or African American'' as ``a person 
        having origins in any of the Black racial groups of Africa'';
            (3) replacing the references to the term ``Oriental'' with 
        ``Asian American or Pacific Islander''; and
            (4) replacing the references to the terms ``Eskimo'' and 
        ``Aleut'' with ``Alaska Native''.

SEC. 3. RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.

    Nothing in this Act, or the amendments required by this Act, shall 
be construed to affect Federal law, except with respect to the use of 
terms by the Secretary of Agriculture and the Secretary of the 
Interior, respectively, to the regulations affected by this Act.

            Passed the House of Representatives November 28, 2017.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
115th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 995

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

    To direct the Secretary of Agriculture and the Secretary of the 
          Interior to modernize terms in certain regulations.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998             JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997             DEC-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1                       1
<CASH>                                       2,372,323               2,372,323
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                8,011,175               8,011,175
<ALLOWANCES>                                   505,000                 505,000
<INVENTORY>                                  7,626,716               7,626,716
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            18,669,253              18,669,253
<PP&E>                                      10,956,528              10,956,528
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,156,619               4,156,619
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              25,611,124              25,611,124
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,347,898               5,347,898
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                       332,796                 332,796
<OTHER-SE>                                  16,709,613              16,709,613
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                25,611,124              25,611,124
<SALES>                                      7,137,503              14,681,507
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,137,503              14,681,507
<CGS>                                        3,864,726               7,903,128
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,715,410              13,673,336
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               290,495                 704,112
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                17,000                  38,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             199,839                 638,756
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                131,598                 304,059
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            131,598                 304,059
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   131,598                 304,059
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .02                     .04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .02                     .04
        

</TABLE>
§ 73.81 Criminal penalties. ( a ) Section 223 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, provides for criminal sanctions for willful violation of, attempted violation of, or conspiracy to violate, any regulation issued under sections 161b, 161i, or 161o of the Act. For purposes of section 223, all the regulations in part 73 are issued under one or more of sections 161b, 161i, or 161o, except for the sections listed in paragraph (b) of this section.
( b ) The regulations in part 73 that are not issued under sections 161b, 161i, or 161o for the purposes of section 223 are as follows: §§ 73.1, 73.2, 73.3, 73.4, 73.5, 73.6, 73.8, 73.25, 73.45, 73.75, 73.80, and 73.81.
( c ) ( 1 ) No person without authorization may carry, transport, or otherwise introduce or cause to be introduced any dangerous weapon, explosive, or other dangerous instrument or material likely to produce substantial injury or damage to persons or property into or upon a protected facility or installation. Willful violations of this provision are punishable by the criminal penalties set forth in sections 229b and 229c of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended.
( 2 ) As used in this section: ( i ) “Protected facility or installation” means any production or utilization facility, high-level waste storage or disposal facility, independent spent fuel storage installation, uranium enrichment, uranium conversion, or nuclear fuel fabrication facility, but does not include those portions of such facilities that are not required under § 73.75(b) of this part to be identified by notices posted at their pedestrian and vehicle entrances, and does not include facilities described in § 73.75(c) of this part.
( ii ) “Without authorization” means not authorized as part of one's official duties to carry the weapon, explosive, or other instrument or material;
( iii ) “Dangerous weapon” includes any firearm, as defined in either 18 U.S.C. 921 or 26 U.S.C. 5845, or dangerous weapon, as defined in 18 U.S.C. 930;
( iv ) “Explosive” means any explosive as defined in 18 U.S.C. 844(j).
( 3 ) An item, such as a dangerous weapon, explosive, or other dangerous instrument or material, is considered to have been carried, transported, or otherwise introduced or caused to be introduced into or upon a protected facility or installation for purposes of paragraph (c)(1) of this section once the item has traveled past a notice posted pursuant to § 73.75 of this part at a vehicle or pedestrian entrance to the protected facility, or once the item has entered the protected facility or installation at a location that is not a vehicle or pedestrian entrance to the facility, whether such entry is accomplished through, over, under, or around a fence, wall, floor, roof, or other structural barrier enclosing the protected facility or installation or by any other means.
( 4 ) For all protected facilities or installations that do not possess special nuclear material, byproduct material, or source material as of the effective date of this rule, this provision shall take effect upon receipt of such material at the applicable facility or installation.
[57 FR 55079, Nov. 24, 1992, as amended at 74 FR 52674, Oct. 14, 2009]
#### § 708.25 Appointment of Administrative Judge.

The OHA Director will appoint an Administrative Judge from the Office of Hearings and Appeals to conduct a hearing.
#### Mercedes Gasc et al., Respondents, v. City of New York, Appellant.

Judgment in favor of plaintiff Mercedes Gase for personal injuries in the sum *531of $55,000 unanimously reversed on the law, on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, without costs and without disbursements, and a new trial granted, unless plaintiff Mercedes Gase, within 20 days of service upon her by defendant of a copy of the order herein, stipulates to accept $35,000 in lieu of the award by verdict, in which event the judgment is modified to that extent and as thus modified affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. It is obvious that the award by verdict of $55,000 is excessive and not supported by the evidence. Concur—Stevens, P. J., Eager, Markewich and McNally, JJ.
#### FULTON v. BUNT et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

June 19, 1914.)

Action by Anna J. Fulton against Permilla A. Bunt, impleaded with others.

No opinion. Motion granted, with $10 costs. Order filed
ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE



Reference is hereby made to that certain
Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of March 1, 2013, by and among DEUTSCHE MORTGAGE & ASSET RECEIVING CORPORATION, as
Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Special Servicer,
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee, and DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS, as Certificate Administrator, Paying Agent
and Custodian, and PARK BRIDGE LENDER SERVICES LLC as Operating Advisor with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates,
Series COMM 2013-CCRE6 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings
assigned in the Agreement.



Pursuant to Section 10.11 of this Agreement,
I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from January 1, 2016 through
December 31, 2016 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has been made
under my supervision, and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its
obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------







IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has
executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2017.





Daniel Bober

Executive Vice President 
Wells Fargo Bank































Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 248 (Tuesday, December 28, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 81616]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-32508]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2010-N-0198]


Agency Information Collection Activities; Announcement of Office 
of Management and Budget Approval; Premarket Notification

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a 
collection of information entitled ``Premarket Notification'' has been 
approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the 
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Daniel Gittleson, Office of 
Information Management, Food and Drug Administration, 1350 Piccard Dr., 
PI50-400B, Rockville, MD 20850, 301-796-5156, e-mail: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5f1b3e31363a337118362b2b333a2c30311f393b3e7137372c71383029"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="8fcbeee1e6eae3a1c8e6fbfbe3eafce0e1cfe9ebeea1e7e7fca1e8e0f9">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the Federal Register of August 11, 2010 
(75 FR 48696), the Agency announced that the proposed information 
collection had been submitted to OMB for review and clearance under 44 
U.S.C. 3507. An Agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not 
required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays 
a currently valid OMB control number. OMB has now approved the 
information collection and has assigned OMB control number 0910-0120. 
The approval expires on December 31, 2013. A copy of the supporting 
statement for this information collection is available on the Internet 
at http://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain.

    Dated: December 21, 2010.
Leslie Kux,
Acting Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2010-32508 Filed 12-27-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### City of Buffalo, Respondent, *v.*Joseph Migliore et al., Appellants.

Fourth Department,

June 25, 1970.

*335
      *John Nasca (Edward P. Rath, Jr.,*of counsel), for appellants.

*Anthony Manguso, Corporation Counsel (Clarence S. Wertheimer*of counsel), for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

The city appropriated realty owned by defendants in the City of Buffalo. Upon the trial the respective experts for the parties expressed- the usual widely divergent opinions as to values by use of the three recognized methods of valuation — replacement cost, market data, and economic approach.

The trial court considered all of these methods of valuation but appears to have relied primarily on the market data approach. This we conclude was error. The proper method of fixing value would have been capitalization of income. *(Matter of City of New York [Maxwell],*15 A D 2d 153, 161.) The property had been leased to a reputable tenant for many years and was income producing at the time of the appropriation. The use of this method, of course, mandates the finding of fair value of the land.

The testimony of the experts called by both parties as to land value was patently deficient because of their failure to make adjustments between the comparable sales proffered by them and subject property. (Cf. *Geffen Motors*v. *State of New York,*33 A D 2d 980.) The city’s appraiser made no adjustments between the comparable sales and subject property. Claimants’ appraiser made no adjustments for comparable land sales and noted only general comments thereon. While adjustments were made for land and building sales they were limited to differences in size with none made for location and time of sales — some of which antedated appropriation by several years.

*336In the posture in which the appeal comes to us it is difficult, if not impossible, to utilize the proper method — capitalization of income — for fixing value. Claimants’ appeal is limited to the amount ($110,000) awarded for improvements. Neither party appeals from so much of the decision as fixed land value at $154,500. The final decree (from which claimants necessarily appeal), however, fixes just compensation at the total sum of $264,500 without breakdown between land and buildings. We conclude, for the reasons heretofore stated, that the proof fails to sustain this award because of the deficiencies in the proof as to land value and the use of an improper method in fixing the building value. In the interest of justice there should be a new trial.

The judgment should be reversed and a new trial granted.

Goldman, P. J., Del Vecchio, Wither, Gabrielli and Bastow, JJ., concur.

Judgment unanimously reversed, on the law and facts, without costs and a new trial granted.
H. Res. 65

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

February 2, 2005.

Resolved, That the following Members be, and are hereby, elected to the following standing committee of the House

of Representatives:

COMMITTEE ON STANDARDS OF OFFICIAL CONDUCT:

Mr. Hastings of Washington, Chairman, Mrs. Biggert, Mr.

Smith of Texas, Ms. Hart and Mr. Cole.

Attest:

Clerk.
Editorial Note on Part 51
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 51 appear at 80 FR 74980, Dec. 1, 2015.

§ 51.74 Distribution of draft environmental impact statement and supplement to draft environmental impact statement; news releases. ( a ) A copy of the draft environmental impact statement will be distributed to: ( 1 ) The Environmental Protection Agency.
( 2 ) Any other Federal agency which has special expertise or jurisdiction by law with respect to any environmental impact involved or which is authorized to develop and enforce relevant environmental standards.
( 3 ) The applicant or petitioner for rulemaking and any other party to the proceeding.
( 4 ) Appropriate State and local agencies authorized to develop and enforce relevant environmental standards.
( 5 ) Appropriate State, regional and metropolitan clearinghouses.
( 6 ) Appropriate Indian Tribes when the proposed action may have an environmental impact on a reservation.
( 7 ) Upon written request, any organization or group included in the master list of interested organizations and groups maintained under § 51.122.
( 8 ) Upon written request, any other person to the extent available.
( b ) Additional copies will be made available in accordance with § 51.123.
( c ) A supplement to a draft environmental impact statement will be distributed in the same manner as the draft environmental impact statement to which it relates.
( d ) News releases stating the availability for comment and place for obtaining or inspecting a draft environmental statement or supplement will be provided to local newspapers and other appropriate media.
( e ) A notice of availability will be published in the Federal Register in accordance with § 51.117.
###### Editorial Note on Part 72

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 72 appear at 80 FR 74981, Dec. 1, 2015, and at 81 FR 86910, Dec. 2, 2016.

#### § 72.176 Audits.

The licensee, applicant for a license, certificate holder, and applicant for a CoC shall carry out a comprehensive system of planned and periodic audits to verify compliance with all aspects of the quality assurance program and to determine the effectiveness of the program. The audits must be performed in accordance with written procedures or checklists by appropriately trained personnel not having direct responsibilities in the areas being audited. Audited results must be documented and reviewed by management having responsibility in the area audited. Follow-up action, including reaudit of deficient areas, must be taken where indicated.
6/24/13 US Department of Transportation Docket Management Sy stem Washington, DC 20590
Attn: I da Klepper Subject: Petition for Exemption
Please accept this letter to formally request a petition for Exemption to combine Analar’s drug program for Part 135 and 91.147 into one program. Analar currently operates under FAA Part 135 certificate # CZIA106D and under a Letter of Agreement issued by F AA for its 91.147 operations. Analar’ s pilots are currentl y tested under its Part 135 drug program and are the same pilots who also conduct flights under its 91.147 L OA.
I am requesting these programs be combined into one program to improve Analar’s efficiency and accuracy of its drug progra m. By

combining the programs there is less chance of error and additionally , it will greatly improve the efficiency

of the DOT/FAA audits of our program. Granting an exemption will not affect public safet y as it will not alter the required drug testing for either purpose (Part 135 or LOA). In addition, the combination of the programs will improve efficiency of the FAA/DOT personnel because they won’t have to audit 2 programs for exact same purpose. Best Regards,

Michael Renz President Analar Corporation mrenz@analarcorp.com
§ 824.2 Applicability. ( a ) *General.* These regulations apply to any person that has entered into a contract or agreement with DOE, or a subcontract or sub-agreement thereto.
( b ) *Limitations.* DOE may not assess any civil penalty against any entity (including subcontractors and suppliers thereto) specified at subsection d. of section 234A of the Act until the entity enters, after October 5, 1999, into a new contract with DOE or an extension of a current contract with DOE, and the total amount of civil penalties may not exceed the total amount of fees paid by the DOE to that entity in that fiscal year.
( c ) *Individual employees.* No civil penalty may be assessed against an individual employee of a contractor or any other entity which enters into an agreement with DOE.
[70 FR 3607, Jan. 26, 2005, as amended at 70 FR 8716, Feb. 23, 2005]
Sanitized Consolidated Chemical Substance 3: Manufacture of

Thermoplastic Pellets
Editorial Note on Part 712
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 712 appear at 88 FR 41292, June 26, 2023.

§ 712.34 Site Occupational Medical Director. ( a ) The SOMD must nominate a physician to serve as the Designated Physician and a clinical psychologist to serve as the Designated Psychologist. The nominations must be sent through the Manager to the Director, Office of Environment, Health, Safety and Security or his or her designee. Each nomination must describe the nominee's relevant training, experience, and licensure, and include a curriculum vitae and a copy of the nominee's current state or district license.
( b ) The SOMD must submit a renomination report biennially through the Manager to the Director, Office of Environment, Health, Safety and Security or his or her designee. This report must be submitted at least 60 days before the second anniversary of the initial designation or of the last redesignation, whichever applies. The report must include: ( 1 ) A statement evaluating the performance of the Designated Physician and Designated Psychologist during the previous designation period; and
( 2 ) A copy of the valid, unrestricted state or district license of the Designated Physician and Designated Psychologist.
( c ) The SOMD must submit, annually, to the Director, Office of Environment, Health, Safety and Security or his or her designee through the Manager, a written report summarizing HRP medical activity during the previous year. The SOMD must comply with any DOE directives specifying the form or contents of the annual report.
( d ) The SOMD must investigate any reports of performance issues regarding a Designated Physician or Designated Psychologist, and the SOMD may suspend either official from HRP-related duties. If the SOMD suspends either official, the SOMD must notify the Director, Office of Environment, Health, Safety and Security or his or her designee and provide supporting documentation and reasons for the action.
[69 FR 3223, Jan. 23, 2004, as amended at 71 FR 68731, Nov. 28, 2006; 83 FR 18208, Apr. 26, 2018; 88 FR 41292, June 26, 2023]