alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### MEMORANDUM OPINION
N o. 04

- 12

- 00285

- CV In the Interest of C.A.N. and R.A.N., III, C hildren From the 37th Judicial District Court , Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 1986

- CI

- 22039 Honorable David A. Berchelmann, Jr. , Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice Delivered and Filed: August 29, 2012
DISMISSED Appellant Jessica Scott attempts to appeal from a final judgment signed on January 24,
2012. For the following reasons, w e dismiss this appeal. The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provide that a notice of appeal must be filed within ninety days after th e judgment is signed if any party timely files a motion for new trial.
T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 26.1(a)(1). T he time to file a notice of appeal is extended if, within fifteen days after the deadline for filing the notice of appeal, an appellant files a notice of ap peal and a motion for extension of time to file a notice of appeal

. T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 26.3. A motion for extension of time is necessarily implied when an appellant, acting in good faith, files a notice of appeal beyond the time allowed by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 26.1 but within the04

- 12

- 00285

- CV

- 2

- fifteen

- day grace period provided by Rule 26.3 for fili ng a motion for extension of time. See Verburgt v. Dorner , 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997) (construing the predecessor to Rule 26). However, the appellant must offer a reasonable explanation for failing to file the notice of appeal in a timely manner. See id. ; T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 26.3, 10.5(b)(2)(A ). Here, the trial court signed a final judgment on January 24, 2012. Appellant timely filed a motion for new trial on February 22, 2012. Therefore, the notice of appeal was due to be filed on April 23, 2012. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 26.1 (a)(1) . A ppellant , however, did not file a notice of appeal until May 7, 2012. Although appellant filed a notice of appeal within the fifteen

- day grace period allowed by Rule 26.3, she did not file a motion for extension of time to file a notice of appeal, which was due on May 8, 2012. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 26.3. We, therefore, ordered appellant to file a response presenting a reasonable explanation for failing to file a notice of appeal in a timely manner. We warned that if appellant fail ed to respond within the time provided, the appeal would be dismissed. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 42.3(c). Appellant failed to respond. Therefore, this appeal is dismissed. Costs of appeal are taxed against appellant.
PER CURIAM
#### PAYNE v. BRADLEY CONTRACTING CO.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

July 10, 1914.)

Action by Albert Payne against the Bradley Contracting Company.

No opinion. Motion to dismiss appeal granted, with $10 costs, unless appellant comply with terms stated in order. Order filed.
Order entered May 28, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-01050-CR

RONNIE CREIGE WILSON, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 3

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F13-62751-J

ORDER

The Court REINSTATES the appeal.

On April 30, 2015, we ordered the trial court to make findings regarding why appellant’s 

brief had not been filed. On May 27, 2015, we received appellant’s brief, together with an 

extension motion. Therefore, in the interest of expediting the appeal, we VACATE the April 30, 

2015 order requiring findings.

We GRANT the May 27, 2015 extension motion and ORDER appellant’s brief filed as 

of the date of this order. 

/s/ ADA BROWN 

JUSTICE
PGI 246.472 Inspection stamping.       (a)(i)  There are two DoD quality inspection approval marking designs (stamps).          (A)  Both stamps are used—          *(1)*  Only by, or under the direct supervision of, the Government representative; and          *(2)*  For both prime and subcontracts.          (B)  The designs of the two stamps and the differences in their uses are—          *(1)*             *Partial (Circle) Inspection Approval Stamp*.          *(i)*  This circular stamp is used to identify material inspected for conformance to only a portion of the contract quality requirements.          *(ii)*  Further inspection is to be performed at another time and/or place.          *(iii)*  Material not inspected is so listed on the associated DD Form 250 (Material Inspection and Receiving Report), packing list, or comparable document.          *(2)*             *Complete (Square) Inspection Approval Stamp*.          *(i)*  This square stamp is used to identify material completely inspected for all contract quality requirements at source.          *(ii)*  The material satisfies all contract quality requirements and is in complete conformance with all contract quality requirements applicable at the time and place of inspection.          *(iii)*  Complete inspection approval establishes that material that once was partially approved has subsequently been completely approved.          *(iv)*  One imprint of the square stamp voids multiple imprints of the circle stamp.          (ii)  The marking of each item is neither required nor prohibited.  Ordinarily, the stamping of shipping containers, packing lists, or routing tickets serves to adequately indicate the status of the material and to control or facilitate its movement.          (iii)  Stamping material does not mean that it has been accepted by the Government.  Evidence of acceptance is ordinarily a signed acceptance certificate on the DD Form 250, Material Inspection and Receiving Report.    **Parent topic:** PGI 246.4 -GOVERNMENT CONTRACT QUALITY ASSURANCE
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 855 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 855

 Recognizing the Nordic Heritage Museum in Seattle, Washington, as the 
                        National Nordic Museum.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 2018

Ms. Jayapal (for herself, Mr. Hoyer, Mr. Smith of Washington, Mr. Heck, 
   Ms. DelBene, Mr. Kilmer, Mr. Larsen of Washington, Mr. Cole, Ms. 
 McCollum, Mr. Doggett, Ms. Jackson Lee, Mrs. Dingell, and Mr. Meeks) 
submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee 
                          on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Recognizing the Nordic Heritage Museum in Seattle, Washington, as the 
                        National Nordic Museum.

Whereas the Nordic Heritage Museum in Seattle, Washington, is the only museum in 
        the United States dedicated to the history, culture, and art of the 
        Nordic nations;
Whereas Nordic people have long contributed to the rich cultural heritage of the 
        United States;
Whereas the Nordic Heritage Museum serves as a unique and valuable resource 
        locally and nationwide in expanding knowledge of Nordic heritage and its 
        impact throughout the U.S.;
Whereas Nordic history, art, and culture will be even more vibrant and 
        accessible when the Nordic Heritage Museum opens its new state-of-the-
        art museum in 2018;
Whereas the State of Washington, King County, the Nordic Council (comprised of 
        Nordic nations), the national museums of Denmark, Finland, Iceland, 
        Norway, and Sweden, and many private individuals have partnered to 
        provide funds and exhibits for the new Nordic Heritage Museum;
Whereas the Nordic Heritage Museum is a significant resource in preserving and 
        celebrating the immigrant Nordic culture, art, and history;
Whereas the Nordic Heritage Museum is the only museum in the U.S. that exists 
        for the exclusive purpose of preserving, interpreting, and providing 
        education about Nordic culture and heritage;
Whereas the Nordic Heritage Museum promotes valuable international relations 
        with the Nordic countries of Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, and 
        Sweden; and
Whereas it is appropriate to designate the Nordic Heritage Museum in Seattle, 
        Washington, as the ``National Nordic Museum'': Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives recognizes the Nordic 
Heritage Museum of Seattle, Washington, as the ``National Nordic 
Museum''.
                                 <all>
```
exv10w4






Exhibit 10.4




AMENDMENT NO. 1

TO

AMENDED AND RESTATED

LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY AGREEMENT

OF

WAMSUTTER LLC




     This Amendment No. 1, dated February 17, 2010 (this “Amendment”) to the Amended and
Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement, dated as of December 1, 2007 (the “Operating
Agreement”), of Wamsutter LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the “Company”), is
entered into by Williams Field Services Company, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and a
member of the Company (“WFSC”), and Williams Partners Operating LLC, a Delaware limited
liability company and a member of the Company (“OpCo”). Capitalized terms used but not
defined herein are used as defined in the Operating Agreement.



RECITALS




     WHEREAS, pursuant to the Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated as of the date hereof, between
WFSC and OpCo, WFSC sold, granted, contributed, transferred, assigned and conveyed 100% of the
Class B Interests in the Company and all of its Class C Interests in the Company, which is
approximately 31% of all the Class C Interests in the Company, to OpCo; and



     WHEREAS, WFSC and OpCo desire to amend the Operating Agreement to reflect that WFSC has ceased
to be a Member, that OpCo now owns 100% of the Class A Interests, Class B Interests and Class C
Interests in the Company, and that OpCo is now the sole Member of the Company.



AGREEMENT




     NOW THEREFORE, the undersigned hereby agree as follows:



     1. Amendments.



     (a) Effective as of the date hereof, for all purposes under the Operating Agreement, all
references to “Class A Member(s),” “Class B Member(s),” “Class C Member(s),” and “Member(s)” shall
mean OpCo.



     (b) Effective as of the date hereof, all Class A Interests, Class B Interests and Class C
Interests shall automatically convert to Common Interests.



     2. No Other Provisions Amended. Except as hereby amended, the Operating Agreement
shall remain in full force and effect.



     3. Governing Law. This Amendment shall be governed by, and interpreted in accordance
with, the laws of the State of Delaware, all rights and remedies being governed by such laws
without regard to principles of conflicts of laws.



 









 





     4. Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of
which shall be deemed an original and all of which, when taken together, constitute one and the
same document.



*  *  *  *  *



2









 





     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment has been executed as of the date first written above.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	WILLIAMS FIELD SERVICES COMPANY, LLC


 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ Alan S. Armstrong 	 
	 	 	Name:  	Alan S. Armstrong 	 
	 	 	Title:  	Senior Vice President 	 
	 
	 	WILLIAMS PARTNERS OPERATING, LLC

 	 
	 	  	 	 
	 	By:  	Williams Partners LP, its managing member 	 
	 	  	
 	 
	 	By:  	Williams Partners GP LLC, its general 	 
	 	 	partner 	 
	 
	 	 	 
	 	By:  	 /s/ Donald R. Chappel 
 	 
	 	 	Name:  	Donald R. Chappel 	 
	 	 	Title:  	Chief Financial Officer 	 
	 



Signature Page to Amendment No. 1 to

Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement

of Wamsutter LLC
§ 1108.385 Third-party in-kind contribution. *Third-party in-kind contribution* means the value of a non-cash contribution (*i.e.,* property or services) that: ( a ) A non-Federal third party contributes, without charge, either to a recipient or subrecipient at any tier under a DoD Component's award; and
( b ) Is identified and included in the approved budget of the DoD Component's award, as a contribution being used toward meeting the award's cost-sharing or matching requirement (which includes voluntary committed, but not voluntary uncommitted, contributions).
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0483

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

KEVIN CHARLES WALLA,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including January 4, 2023, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

November 28 2022

11/28/2022

Case Number: DA 22-0483
# EUR-Lex - 31989R0213 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31989R0213

**Commission Regulation (EEC) No 213/89 of 27 January 1989 amending Regulation (EEC) No 2288/83 establishing the list of biological or chemical substances provided for in Article 60 (1) (b) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 918/83 setting up a Community system of reliefs from customs duty **

*
Official Journal L 025 , 28/01/1989 P. 0070 - 0070 Finnish special edition: Chapter 2 Volume 7 P. 0005 Swedish special edition: Chapter 2 Volume 7 P. 0005 *

*****

COMMISSION REGULATION (EEC) No 213/89

of 27 January 1989

amending Regulation (EEC) No 2288/83 establishing the list of biological or chemical substances provided for in Article 60 (1) (b) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 918/83 setting up a Community system of reliefs from customs duty

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 918/83 of 28 March 1983 setting up a Community system of reliefs from customs duty (1), as amended by Regulation (EEC) No 4235/88 (2), and in particular Article 143 (1) thereof,

Whereas Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2288/83 (3), as last amended by Regulation (EEC) No 3692/87 (4), sets out the list of biological or chemical substances provided for in Article 60 (1) (b) of Regulation (EEC) No 918/83; whereas it has emerged from additional information received from Member States that the Regulation should again be amended in such a way as to include in the list a substance not contained therein for which there is at present no equivalent production within the customs territory of the Community;

Whereas it is necessary to provide for the retrospective application of these provisions so that they cover imports of that substance as from 1 September 1988;

Whereas the measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee on Duty Free Arrangements,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The Annex to Regulation (EEC) No 2288/83 is hereby completed by insertion of the substance named 'Orcoacid Sulphorhodamine G' (CN code 3204).

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

It shall apply with effect from 1 September 1988.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 27 January 1989.

For the Commission

Christiane SCRIVENER

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ No L 105, 23. 4. 1983, p. 1.

(2) OJ No L 373, 31. 12. 1988, p. 1.

(3) OJ No L 220, 11. 8. 1983, p. 13.

(4) OJ No L 347, 11. 12. 1987, p. 16.
**Exhibit
      32.2**





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Patient Safety Technologies, Inc. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2005 as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
      I, William B. Horne, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




February
                13, 2006
              By:
              /s/ William B. HorneWilliam
                B. HorneChief
                Financial Officer
§ 81.50 Additional licenses. Subject to any outstanding licenses, nothing in this subpart shall preclude the Commission from granting additional nonexclusive and limited exclusive licenses for inventions covered by this subpart when the Commission determines that to do so would provide for an equitable exchange of patent rights. The following exemplify circumstances wherein such licenses may be granted: ( a ) In consideration of the settlement of interferences;
( b ) In consideration of a release of any claims;
( c ) In exchange for or as part of the consideration for a license under adversely held patent(s); or
( d ) In consideration for the settlement or resolution of any proceeding under the Act or other statute.
Editorial Note on Part 55
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 55 appear at 80 FR 74980, Dec. 1, 2015.

§ 55.61 Modification and revocation of licenses. ( a ) The terms and conditions of all licenses are subject to amendment, revision, or modification by reason of rules, regulations, or orders issued in accordance with the Act or any amendments thereto.
( b ) Any license may be revoked, suspended, or modified, in whole or in part: ( 1 ) For any material false statement in the application or in any statement of fact required under section 182 of the Act,
( 2 ) Because of conditions revealed by the application or statement of fact or any report, record, inspection or other means that would warrant the Commission to refuse to grant a license on an original application,
( 3 ) For willful violation of, or failure to observe any of the terms and conditions of the Act, or the license, or of any rule, regulation, or order of the Commission, or
( 4 ) For any conduct determined by the Commission to be a hazard to safe operation of the facility.
( 5 ) For the sale, use or possession of illegal drugs, or refusal to participate in the facility drug and alcohol testing program, or a confirmed positive test for drugs, drug metabolites, or alcohol in violation of the conditions and cutoff levels established by § 55.53(j) or the consumption of alcoholic beverages within the protected area of power reactors or the controlled access area of non-power reactors, or a determination of unfitness for scheduled work as a result of the consumption of alcoholic beverages.
[52 FR 9460, Mar. 25, 1987, as amended at 56 FR 32070, July 15, 1991]
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 536 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 536

Expressing condolences to the people and Government of Nigeria for the 
   loss of life suffered in the crash of a Nigerian passenger jet on 
 October 22 and the tragic death of Stella Obasanjo, wife of Nigerian 
  President Olusegun Obasanjo, at a hospital in Spain on October 23, 
                                 2005.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            November 4, 2005

 Mr. Payne (for himself, Mr. Jefferson, Mr. Tancredo, Mr. Rangel, Ms. 
Kilpatrick of Michigan, Mr. Bishop of Georgia, Ms. Carson, Ms. Corrine 
 Brown of Florida, Mr. Towns, Ms. McCollum of Minnesota, Mr. Meeks of 
New York, Mr. Lewis of Georgia, Mr. Wynn, Mr. Butterfield, Mr. Lantos, 
  Mr. Brady of Pennsylvania, Mr. Owens, and Ms. Waters) submitted the 
     following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 
                        International Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Expressing condolences to the people and Government of Nigeria for the 
   loss of life suffered in the crash of a Nigerian passenger jet on 
 October 22 and the tragic death of Stella Obasanjo, wife of Nigerian 
  President Olusegun Obasanjo, at a hospital in Spain on October 23, 
                                 2005.

Whereas on October 22, 2005, a passenger jet en route from Lagos to the Nigerian 
        capital of Abuja crashed shortly after takeoff;
Whereas all 111 passengers and six crew members of Bellview Airlines Flight 210 
        perished in the crash;
Whereas the pilot of Bellview Airlines Flight 210 reportedly sent a distress 
        call approximately three minutes after takeoff;
Whereas, according to the Nigerian Aviation Minister, the crash may have been a 
        result of an explosion onboard the aircraft; and
Whereas on October 23, 2005, Stella Obasanjo, wife of Nigerian President 
        Olusegun Obasanjo, died from complications resulting from surgery at a 
        hospital in Spain: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) expresses condolences to the people and Government of 
        the Federal Republic of Nigeria for the tragic loss of life 
        suffered in the crash of Bellview Airlines Flight 210 on 
        October 22 and the tragic death of Stella Obasanjo, wife of 
        Nigerian President Olusegun Obasanjo, at a hospital in Spain on 
        October 23, 2005; and
            (2) urges the Government of the United States to provide 
        assistance to the Government of Nigeria in the investigation to 
        determine the cause and responsibility of the crash of Bellview 
        Airlines Flight 210.
                                 <all>
```
§ 820.12 Classified, confidential, and controlled information ( a ) *General rule.* The DOE Official in charge of a proceeding under this part may utilize any procedures deemed appropriate to safeguard and prevent disclosure of classified, confidential, and controlled information, including Restricted Data and National Security Information, to unauthorized persons, with minimum impairment of rights and obligations under this part.
( b ) *Obligation to protect restricted information.* Nothing in this part shall relieve any person from safeguarding classified, confidential, and controlled information, including Restricted Data or National Security Information, in accordance with the applicable provisions of federal statutes and the rules, regulations, and orders of any federal agency.