alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

August 11, 2016

No. 04-16-00347-CV

ALLSTATE COUNTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY,

Appellant

v.

Gregorio G. PAREDES Jr.,

Appellee

From the 49th Judicial District Court, Zapata County, Texas

Trial Court No. 9,016

Honorable Jose A. Lopez, Judge Presiding

O R D E R O F R E F E R R A L

After reviewing the parties’ responses to this court’s prior order, the court has determined 

this appeal is appropriate for referral to alternative dispute resolution. TEX. CIV. PRAC. & 

REM. CODE § 154.021(a); 4TH TEX. APP. (SAN ANTONIO) LOC. R. 2. It is therefore 

ORDERED that this appeal is referred to a mediated settlement conference to be conducted by 

Paul Van Osselaer, Van Osselaer Dispute Resolution, PLLC, 2305 Cheswick Court, Austin, TX 

78746-1935, (512) 593-5104, the Mediator selected by the parties.

It is FURTHER ORDERED that all appellate deadlines are hereby suspended until 

September 26, 2016.

It is FURTHER ORDERED that mediation shall commence at such place as the Mediator 

may designate and proceed in accordance with the schedule set by the Mediator until completed, 

but in any event the mediation shall be completed no later than forty-five (45) days from the date 

of this Order. The Mediator shall file with the Clerk of Court within three (3) days of the 

completion of the mediation a written report concerning the disposition of this appeal.

It is FURTHER ORDERED that the Mediator shall be compensated and that parties in 

this cause shall be equally responsible for its share of this obligation. Mediation fees shall 

ultimately be taxed as court costs. TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE § 154.054.
It is FURTHER ORDERED that all parties to this cause are directed to attend the 

mediated settlement conference with their counsel of record. The corporate party representative 

in attendance and the individual party representatives shall have full authority to settle up to and 

including the judgment amount. To facilitate this procedure the Mediator shall encourage and 

assist, but will not compel or coerce the parties in reaching a settlement of the dispute. Unless the 

parties otherwise agree, all matters, including the conduct and demeanor of the parties and their 

counsel during mediation, shall remain confidential and shall never be disclosed to anyone, 

including this court. See id. § 154.053.

If the parties are able to settle all matters related to this appeal, the parties are directed to 

file a joint motion requesting an appropriate disposition of this appeal within thirty (30) days of 

the date of mediation.

It is so ORDERED on August 11, 2016.

___________________________________

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on August 11, 2016.

___________________________________

 Keith E. Hottle, Clerk
#### § 766.2 Applicability.

This part applies to all domestic utilities in the United States that purchased separative work units from the DOE between 1945 and October 23, 1992.
# EUR-Lex - 31984R3516 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31984R3516

**Commission Regulation (EEC) No 3516/84 of 13 December 1984 on the classification of goods falling within subheading 08.12 C of the Common Customs Tariff **

*
Official Journal L 328 , 15/12/1984 P. 0008 - 0008 Finnish special edition: Chapter 2 Volume 4 P. 0046 Spanish special edition: Chapter 02 Volume 13 P. 0004 Swedish special edition: Chapter 2 Volume 4 P. 0046 Portuguese special edition Chapter 02 Volume 13 P. 0004 *

*****

COMMISSION REGULATION (EEC) No 3516/84

of 13 December 1984

on the classification of goods falling within subheading 08.12 C of the Common Customs Tariff

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN

COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 97/69 of 16 January 1969 on measures to be taken for the uniform application of the nomenclature of the Common Customs Tariff (1), as last amended by Regulation (EEC) No 2055/84 (2), and in particular Article 3 thereof,

Whereas, in order to ensure that the Common Customs Tariff Nomenclature is applied uniformly, measures must be taken concerning the classification of pitted prunes, ready to eat, having a moisture content not exceeding 35 % to which sorbic acid has been added;

Whereas heading No 08.12 of the Common Customs Tariff annexed to Council Regulation (EEC) No 950/68 (3), as last amended by Regulation (EEC) No 3400/84 (4), relates in particular to dried fruits other than those falling within heading No 08.01 to 08.05 inclusive;

Whereas the products in question have the characteristics of goods falling within heading No 08.12 and must therefore be classified in this heading; whereas, within the latter, subheading 08.12 C is the most appropriate;

Whereas the measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee on Common Customs Tariff Nomenclature,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Pitted prunes, ready to eat, having a moisture content not exceeding 35 % to which sorbic acid has been added, shall be classified in the Common Customs Tariff within subheading:

08.12 Fruit, dried, other than that falling within heading Nos 08.01, 08.02, 08.03, 08.04 or 08.05:

C. Prunes

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the 21st day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 13 December 1984.

For the Commission

Karl-Heinz Narjes

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ No L 14, 21. 1. 1969, p. 1.

(2) OJ No L 191, 19. 7. 1984, p. 1.

(3) OJ No L 172, 22. 7. 1968, p. 1.

(4) OJ No L 320, 10. 12. 1984, p. 1.
**EXHIBIT 35.1**

 

SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

 

I, Erin M. Rohde, certify that:

 

(a)                                 A review of the Servicer’s activities and of its performance under the applicable servicing agreement during the period from January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2015 has been made under my supervision.

 

(b)                                 To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the applicable servicing agreement in all material respects throughout the aforementioned period.

 

Dated March 21, 2016

 
|   | /s/  Erin M. Rohde               |
|--------|---------------------------------------|
|   | Erin M. Rohde                         |
|   | Assistant Treasurer of                |
|   | Ford Motor Credit Company LLC,        |
|   | as Servicer of Ford Credit Auto Owner |
|   | Trust 2013-A                          |

 

----
§ 835.606 Exceptions to labeling requirements. ( a ) Items and containers may be excepted from the radioactive material labeling requirements of § 835.605 when: ( 1 ) Used, handled, or stored in areas posted and controlled in accordance with this subpart and sufficient information is provided to permit individuals to take precautions to avoid or control exposures; or
( 2 ) The quantity of radioactive material is less than one tenth of the values specified in appendix E of this part and less than 0.1 Ci; or
( 3 ) Packaged, labeled, and marked in accordance with the regulations of the Department of Transportation or DOE Orders governing radioactive material transportation; or
( 4 ) Inaccessible, or accessible only to individuals authorized to handle or use them, or to work in the vicinity; or
( 5 ) Installed in manufacturing, process, or other equipment, such as reactor components, piping, and tanks; or
( 6 ) The radioactive material consists solely of nuclear weapons or their components.
( b ) Radioactive material labels applied to sealed radioactive sources may be excepted from the color specifications of § 835.601(a).
[63 FR 59684, Nov. 4, 1998, as amended at 72 FR 31927, June 8, 2007]
PGI Part 226 - OTHER SOCIOECONOMIC PROGRAMS       PGI 226.1 -INDIAN INCENTIVE PROGRAM                                                         PGI 226.103 Procedures.    **Parent topic:** PGI Defense Federal Acquisition RegulationPGI 226.1 -INDIAN INCENTIVE PROGRAM    PGI 226.103 Procedures.       (1) Submit a request for funding of the Indian incentive to—          Director, the Office of Small Business Programs          201 12th Street South, Suite 406          Arlington, VA 22202-5411.          (2) Upon receipt of funding from the Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense (Industrial Policy), Office of Small Business Programs, issue a contract modification to add the Indian incentive funding for payment of the contractor’s request for adjustment as described in the clause at DFARS 252.226-7001, Utilization of Indian Organizations, Indian-Owned Economic Enterprises, and Native Hawaiian Small Business Concerns.
Editorial Note on Part 72
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 72 appear at 80 FR 74981, Dec. 1, 2015, and at 81 FR 86910, Dec. 2, 2016.

§ 72.96 Siting limitations. ( a ) An ISFSI which is owned and operated by DOE must not be located at any site within which there is a candidate site for a HLW repository. This limitation shall apply until such time as DOE decides that such candidate site is no longer a candidate site under consideration for development as a HLW repository.
( b ) An MRS must not be sited in any State in which there is located any site approved for site characterization for a HLW repository. This limitation shall apply until such time as DOE decides that the candidate site is no longer a candidate site under consideration for development as a repository. This limitation shall continue to apply to any site selected for construction as a repository.
( c ) If an MRS is located, or is planned to be located, within 50 miles of the first HLW repository, any Commission decision approving the first HLW repository application must limit the quantity of spent fuel or high-level radioactive waste that may be stored. This limitation shall prohibit the storage of a quantity of spent fuel containing in excess of 70,000 metric tons of heavy metal, or a quantity of solidified high-level radioactive waste resulting from the reprocessing of such a quantity of spent fuel, in both the repository and the MRS until such time as a second repository is in operation.
( d ) An MRS authorized by section 142(b) of NWPA (101 Stat. 1330-232, 42 U.S.C. 10162(b)) may not be constructed in the State of Nevada. The quantity of spent nuclear fuel or high-level radioactive waste that may be stored at an MRS authorized by section 142(b) of NWPA shall be subject to the limitations in § 72.44(g) of this part instead of the limitations in paragraph (c) of this section.
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Clean Systems Technology Group, Ltd.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Yona Leibowitz Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     3)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     4)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.


June 6, 2004
                                        By: /s/ YONA LEIBOWITZ
                                            ------------------
                                        Name: Yona Leibowitz
                                        Title:  Chief Financial Officer







<PAGE>
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

ALBERT ROBINSON, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D18-3685

)

DAVID KEITH OAKS, )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed November 6, 2019.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for 

Sarasota County; Frederick P. Mercurio, 

Judge.

Albert Robinson, pro se.

David K. Oaks of David K. Oaks, P.A., 

Punta Gorda, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

SILBERMAN, BADALAMENTI, and SMITH, JJ., Concur.
#### PERLITCH v. SIMON.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department.

December 24, 1914.)

Licenses (§ 39*)—Recovery by Unlicensed Persons—Plumbers.

A party must prove that he is a licensed plumber, in order to recover for labor and materials furnished as a plumber.

[Ed. Note.—For other cases, see Licenses, Cent. Dig. §§ 76-78; Dec. Dig. § 39.*]

Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of the Bronx, Second District.

Action by Harry Perlitch against Louise Simon.' Judgment for plaintiff,' and defendant appeals. Reversed.

Argued December term, 1914, before GUY, BIJUR, and PAGE, JJ.

Charles Frankel, of New York City, for appellant.

Isidor Block, of New York City, for respondent.

PAGE, J.

This is an action brought by a plumber to recover for labor and materials furnished in installing a hot water heater and boiler and putting in a new water main in the defendant’s house. The plaintiff failed to plead and prove that he was a licensed plumber, which was a prerequisite to his right to recover. Milton Schnaier & Co. v. Grigsby, 132 App. Div. 854, 117 N. Y. Supp. 455, affirmed on opinion of Scott, J., below, 199 N. Y. 577, 93 N. E. 1125. The defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint upon that ground, made at the close of the entire case, should have been granted.

The judgment should be reversed, with costs, and the complaint dismissed. All concur.
Exhibit 99.1

For Immediate Release:
----------------------

          4net Software, Inc. Terminates Letter of Intent with NWT Inc.

Ridgefield, CT (February 14, 2003) Today, 4net Software, Inc. (OTC BB: FNSI)
announced that it received correspondence from NWT Inc., that states that NWT is
unwilling to proceed with the merger transaction contemplated by the Letter of
Intent (the "LOI"), which was previously announced by 4net Software on December
30, 2002. Based on the correspondence received from NWT, 4net Software has
notified NWT that the LOI is terminated based upon NWT's unwillingness to
proceed with the merger transaction, and that 4net Software has demanded that
NWT pay the agreed to break-up fee in the amount of $50,000.00 in accordance
with the terms of the LOI. While NWT has indicated that it is interested in
discussing some type of transaction with 4net Software there can be no assurance
that any transaction with NWT will be completed.

         4net Software's CEO and President, Steven N. Bronson, stated that, "We
are deeply regretful that NWT has changed its position and is now unwilling to
proceed with transaction the parties agreed to in the LOI." Mr. Bronson stated
further that "While it is frustrating to spend considerable amount of energy,
time and money to pursue the NWT merger, we are still committed in pursuing our
goal of completing a merger and/or acquisition that will enhance 4netSoftware's
revenue and increase shareholder value."

Forward-Looking Information. This release contains certain "forward-looking
statements" within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act
of 1995. These statements are based on management's current expectations and are
subject to uncertainty and changes in circumstances. Actual results may vary
materially from the expectations contained in the forward-looking statements.
These statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to
certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult to predict.
Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking
statements, which speak only as of the date of this release. Detailed
information about factors pertinent to the business of 4net Software that could
cause actual results to differ is set forth in the Company's filings with the
Securities and Exchange Commission, including the Company's Annual Report for
the fiscal year ended September 30, 2002 and its most recent Quarterly Reports.
4net Software, Inc. is under no obligation to (and expressly disclaims any such
obligation to) update or alter its forward-looking statements whether as a
result of new information, future events or otherwise.

Contact Details

For information regarding 4net Software, please contact:

Steven N. Bronson, President
4net Software, Inc.
10 South Street, Suite 202
Ridgefield, Connecticut 06877
Telephone: (203) 894-9755
Fax: (203) 894-8990
#### § 1108.298 Prior approval.

*Prior approval* means written or electronic approval by a DoD grants or agreements officer evidencing prior consent. When prior approval is required for an activity or expenditure that would result in a direct cost to a DoD award, the grants or agreements officer's signature on an award that includes the planned activity or expenditure in the scope of work or approved budget satisfies the requirement for prior approval. Otherwise, a recipient is required to obtain such approval after award.
EXHIBIT 31.2



CERTIFICATIONS OF
PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION
302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Jack Ross, certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Synergy CHC Corp. (the “Company”);                                                                                                                                                                                              
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.



|Date: May 12, 2020 | By: | /s/ Jack Ross                               
|------------------ | --- | --------------------------------------------
|                   |     | Chief Financial Officer                     
|                   |     | (Principle Financial and Accounting Officer)
#### § 205.191 [Reserved]
IV 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 579 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the symbols and 

traditions of Christmas should be protected. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 6, 2005 

Mrs. JO ANN DAVIS of Virginia (for herself, Mr. BARTLETT of Maryland, Mr. 

GOODE, and Mr. JONES of North Carolina) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Government Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that 

the symbols and traditions of Christmas should be protected. 

Whereas Christmas is a national holiday celebrated on December 25; and 

Whereas the Framers intended that the First Amendment to 

the Constitution of the United States would prohibit the 

establishment of religion, not prohibit any mention of religion or reference to God in civic dialog: Now, therefore, 

be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) recognizes the importance of the symbols 

3 and traditions of Christmas; 
2 

•HRES 579 IH 

1 (2) strongly disapproves of attempts to ban ref2 erences to Christmas; and 

3 (3) expresses support for the use of these sym4 bols and traditions. 

Æ
# L_2023173EN.01004101.xml

| 6.7.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 173/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.7.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 173/41

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE No 139/2020

of 25 September 2020

amending Annex XIII (Transport) to the EEA Agreement [2023/1398]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (“the EEA Agreement”), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/2105 of 9 December 2019 amending Regulation (EC) No 474/2006 as regards the list of air carriers which are banned from operating or are subject to operational restrictions within the Union (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/2105 of 9 December 2019 amending Regulation (EC) No 474/2006 as regards the list of air carriers which are banned from operating or are subject to operational restrictions within the Union (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following indent is added in point 66zab (Commission Regulation (EC) No 474/2006) of Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘- | 32019 R 2105: Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/2105 of 9 December 2019 (OJ L 318, 10.12.2019, p. 79).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘-

32019 R 2105: Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/2105 of 9 December 2019 (OJ L 318, 10.12.2019, p. 79).’

Article 2

The text of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/2105 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 26 September 2020, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 25 September 2020.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Sabine MONAUNI

---

(1)  
  OJ L 318, 10.12.2019, p. 79.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---