alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
2414.408-70 Award when only one bid is received.       When only one bid is received in response to an invitation for bids, such bid may be considered and accepted if the Contracting Officer makes a written determination that: (a) The specifications were clear and not unduly restrictive; (b) adequate competition was solicited and it could have been reasonably assumed that more than one bid would have been submitted; (c) the price is reasonable; and (d) the bid is otherwise in accordance with the invitation for bids. Such a determination shall be placed in the file.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 2414.4 - Opening of Bids and Award of Contracts
#### § 1108.360 Subrecipient.

*Subrecipient* means an entity that receives a subaward.
H. Res. 441

In the House of Representatives, U.S., 

September 20, 2005.

Whereas the Space Shuttle Return-to-Flight is the first step 

in the Nation’s Vision for Space Exploration; 

Whereas the Space Shuttle Discovery Crew completed three 

highly successful extra-vehicular activity spacewalks; 

Whereas the STS flight 114 accomplished the first in-flight 

heat shield repairs on the Space Shuttle; 

Whereas the Discovery crew delivered more than 6 tons of 

needed supplies and equipment to the International 

Space Station; 

Whereas Discovery’s spacewalkers removed a failed Space 

Station gyroscope and replaced it with a new one, restoring full capability of the Station’s attitude control system; 

Whereas the Discovery mission successfully used three different Canadian robotic extensions to conduct spacewalks 

and to survey the Shuttle: the Shuttle Canadarm; the 

Space Station Canadarm2; and the Orbiter Boom Sensor 

System; 

Whereas the crew of the Discovery experienced ‘‘virtual’’ visits from leaders of 2 nations, the President of the United 

States and the Prime Minister of Japan; and 
2

•HRES 441 EH 

Whereas Commander Eileen Collins led the crew of 7 and 

guided the Discovery vehicle through an unprecedented 

back flip maneuver: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

(1) commends the entire National Aeronautics and 

Space Administration team and community, who provided invaluable technical support and leadership for the 

historic mission of Space Shuttle Discovery STS flight 

114; 

(2) commends Commander Eileen Collins, for being 

the first female space shuttle commander and a role 

model for all; 

(3) commends Col. Jim Kelly, pilot of STS 114, for 

his second flight aboard the Space Shuttle and his participation in robotic arm operations; 

(4) commends Charlie Camarda, mission specialist, 

a ‘‘rookie’’ who performed like a veteran by transferring 

the multipurpose logistics module from the International 

Space Station to the Space Shuttle; 

(5) commends Wendy Lawrence, mission specialist, 

for outstanding skill in operating Canadarm2; 

(6) commends Soichi Noguchi of Japan, mission 

specialist, a ‘‘rookie’’ who was a ‘‘spacewalker’’ for the 

inspections and repairs of the Space Shuttle; 

(7) commends Steve Robinson, mission specialist, 

for his outstanding skill as a ‘‘spacewalker,’’ who en-
3

•HRES 441 EH 

hanced and repaired Discovery and the International 

Space Station; and 

(8) commends Andy Thomas, mission specialist, 

who performed the laser checks on the leading edge of 

the Space Shuttle by the operation of Canadarm2.

Attest:

Clerk.
#### Marion Teschke et al., Respondents, v. State of New York, Appellant.

(Claim No. 45719.)

Herlihy, J.

Appeal by the State from a judgment of the Court of Claims entered March 7, 1968 awarding damages to the claimants. The finding of the trial court that the water in the area of the *979restroom where claimant Marion Tesehke fell was the result of being tracked in by patrons following a “downpour of rain” which occurred just prior to the accident mandates the conclusion that the State had not failed to exercise reasonable care. (See *Pascual*v. *State of New York,*23 A D 2d 518; *Kelly*v. *State of New York,*29 A D 2d 904.) In the absence of notice, either actual or constructive, claimants must prove that the State created the hazardous condition and this the claimant failed to show. (See *Conroy*v. *Saratoga Springs Auth.,*259 App. Div. 365, 367, affd. 284 N. Y. 723; *Antenen*v. *New York Tel. Co.,*271 N. Y. 558; *Miller*v. *Gimbel Bros.,*262 N. Y. 107.) Judgment reversed, on the law and the facts, and claim dismissed without costs. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds, Staley, Jr., and Greenblott, JJ., concur in memorandum by Herlihy, J.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Washington, DC 20460 OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION June 28 , 2011 MEMORANDUM SUBJECT: Meeting between EPA and CD - Adapco FROM: Arvon Mitcham, Mechanical Engineer, and Sam Waltzer, Environmental

Engineer. TO: Docket EPA - HQ - OAR- 2010 - 0162 This memorandum documents the meeting held on June 2 7 , 2011, between representatives from the USEPA and CD - Adapco. This meeting was a discussion of computational fluid dy namics (CFD) test data and general simulation practices. Attendees included: Arvon Mitcham, USEPA Sam Waltzer, USEPA Gregg Gustafson, CD - Adapco Fred Ross, CD - Adapco Kevin Horrigan, CD - Adapco
October 16, 2015

Mr. Cody Sheehy

3740 North Bearcreek Circle

Tucson, AR 85749

Dear Mr. Sheehy:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your petition for an exemption from 

§§ 91.103(b), 91.105, 91.109, 91.119, 91.121, 91.151, 91.405, 91.407, 91.409, and 91.417 of 

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we cannot process your 

request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can Not Process Your Request

We received your June 18, 2015, exemption request filed in Docket No. FAA−2015−3128, 

but we are unable to process your request any further. Your petition does not comply with the 

requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must 

send us all of the following:

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

For more detailed information relating to submitting petitions for exemption, please visit 

http://aes.faa.gov/petition/index.html. This website helps the petitioner to meet Federal 

Aviation Administration (FAA) requirement outlines in § 11.81 and helps answer any 

questions you may have.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must submit the requested information 

within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption 

at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. 
2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further. 

If you have any questions you may call the 333 Information Line (202) 267-2999.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and

 Airspace Rules Division

Enclosures
3
4
**EXHIBIT
      32**





**Certification
      of Periodic Financial Report**


**Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350**








Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of Criticare
      Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) certifies that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
      of the Company for the period ended March 31, 2006 fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
      information contained in that Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.











Date:
      May
      9, 2006 /s/
      Emil H.
      Soika


Emil
      H.
      Soika, Chief Executive Officer











Date:
      May
      9,
      2006 /s/
      Joel D.
      Knudson


Joel
      D.
      Knudson, Vice President - Finance











This
      Certification is made solely for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject
      to
      the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other
      purpose.
Exhibit 32.2

                                  CERTIFICATION
                           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Perkins Oil & Gas, Inc.
(the "Company") for the year ended June 30, 2013, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Howard H. Hendricks,
as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-OxLey Act of 2002,
that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Date: January 14, 2015                By: /s/ Howard H. Hendricks
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Howard H. Hendricks
                                          Chief Financial Officer

This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of ss.18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 1402.102 Are there any exceptions to this part? ( a ) Awards made in accordance with the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act (Pub. L. 93-638, 88 Stat. 2204), as amended, are governed by 25 CFR parts 900 and 1000, and by 2 CFR part 200, subparts E and F.
( b ) Exceptions for individual foreign entities to the requirements in this part may be authorized by the Director, Office of Grants Management. Such exceptions must be made in accordance with written bureau or office policy and procedures. ( 1 ) Foreign entities must request any exception to a requirement established in this part in writing. Such requests must be submitted to the funding bureau or office by an authorized official of the foreign entity, and must provide sufficient pertinent background information, including: ( i ) Identification of the requirement under this part that is inconsistent with an in-country statute or regulation to which the foreign entity is subject;
( ii ) A complete description of the in-country statute or regulation, including a description of how it prohibits or otherwise limits the foreign entity's ability to comply with the identified requirement under this part; and
( iii ) Identification of the entity's name, DOI award(s) affected, and point of contact for the request.
( 2 ) The Director, Office of Grants Management may approve exceptions for individual foreign entities to the requirements of this part only when it has been determined that the requirement to be waived is inconsistent with either the international obligations of the United States or the statutes or regulations of a foreign government. Bureaus and offices will communicate exception request decisions to the requesting entity in writing.
( 3 ) Submissions by public international organization submissions of any assurances, certifications or representations required for and related to a Federal award do not constitute a waiver of immunities provided under the International Organizations Immunities Act (22 U.S.C. 288-288f).
( 4 ) Foreign entities are not subject to the following requirements in 2 CFR part 200: ( i ) Foreign entities may be subject to other applicable international or in-country alternatives to generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), such as the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). See 2 CFR 200.403, Factors affecting allowability of costs;
( ii ) 2 CFR 200.321, Contracting with small and minority businesses, women's business enterprises, and labor surplus area firms; and
( iii ) Section 6002 of the Solid Waste Disposal Act. See 2 CFR 200.322, Procurement of recovered materials.
#### § 835.404 [Reserved]
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18,
UNITED STATES CODE) In connection with the Quarterly Report of Del Taco Income Properties IV (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each
of the undersigned officers of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §
1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. Date:
    
    November 12, 2004
    
    /s/ Kevin K. MoriartyKevin K. Moriarty
Director, Chairman and
Chief Executive OfficerDate:
    
    November 12, 2004
    
    /s/ Robert J. TerranoRobert J. Terrano
Executive Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                              5
<LEGEND> THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL
INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE REGISTRANT'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE
THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN
SUCH REPORT.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>1 
       
<S>                                                    <C>  
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                          3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                      DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                           MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                                      166194
<SECURITIES>                                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                             10593692
<ALLOWANCES>                                                     0
<INVENTORY>                                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                          10759886
<PP&E>                                                           0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                   0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                            33867832
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                       221031
<BONDS>                                                          0
<COMMON>                                                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                            0
<PREFERRED>                                                      0
<OTHER-SE>                                                33646801
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                              33867832
<SALES>                                                      54266
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                            790664
<CGS>                                                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                               137043
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                             90732
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                               0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                             562889
<INCOME-TAX>                                                562889
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                         562889
<DISCONTINUED>                                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                  0
<CHANGES>                                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                                                562889
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                    0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                    0
        


</TABLE>
227 So.2d 591

#### Liston BROWN, as administrator of the Estate of Michael Brown v. CITY OF ALEXANDRIA.

No. 50097.

Nov. 10, 1969.

In re: City of Alexandria applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Rapides. 225 So.2d 157; 226 So.2d 600.

The application is denied. On the facts of the case as found by the court of appeal there appears no error of law in the judgment complained of.
Exhibit 99.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Steven N. Bronson, the President and sole officer of Bio-Medical Automation,
Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


(a) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarterly period
ended September 30, 2002, to which this certification accompanies (the "Periodic
Report"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


(b) the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated: November 14, 2002


                                              /s/ Steven N. Bronson
                                              ------------------------------
                                              Steven N. Bronson, President
**CERTIFICATION**

** **

 

Re:          **Morgan Stanley Bank of America Merrill Lynch Trust 2013-C9, CommercialMortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2013-C9** (the “Transaction”),issued pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of May 1, 2013 (the“Pooling and Servicing Agreement”), executed in connection with the Transaction(capitalized terms used but not defined herein have the meanings set forth inthe Pooling and Servicing Agreement).

                               

I, Jane Lam, certify that:

 

               1.             Ihave reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required tobe filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of MorganStanley Bank of America Merrill Lynch Trust 2013-C9 (the “Exchange Act periodicreports”);

 

               2.            Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, donot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 

 

               3.            Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other informationrequired to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this reportis included in the Exchange Act periodic reports; 

 

               4.            Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement(s) required in thisreport under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in theExchange Act periodic reports, the servicer(s) have fulfilled their obligationsunder the servicing agreement(s) in all material respects; and

 

               5.             Allof the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria forasset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment ofcompliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to beincluded in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB andExchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to thisreport, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any materialinstances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed inthis report on Form 10-K.  

 

In giving the certificationsabove, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the followingunaffiliated parties:

 

Wells Fargo Bank, NationalAssociation, as Trustee

Wells Fargo Bank, NationalAssociation, as Certificate Administrator

Wells Fargo Bank, NationalAssociation, as Custodian

Midland Loan Services, aDivision of PNC Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer

LNR Partners, LLC, as SpecialServicer

Trimont Real Estate Advisors,Inc., as Operating Advisor

 

 

Date:  March 26, 2020

 

 

By /s/ Jane Lam

Name: Jane Lam

Title: Director and President
§ 600.322 Federally owned property. ( a ) *Annual inventory.* The recipient must submit annually to the contracting officer an inventory listing of all Federally owned property in its custody, i.e., property furnished by the Federal Government, rather than acquired by the recipient with Federal funds under the award.
( b ) *Insurance.* The recipient may not insure Federally owned property unless required by the terms and conditions of the award.
( c ) *Use on other activities.* ( 1 ) Use of federally owned property on other activities is permissible, if authorized by the contracting officer responsible for administering the award to which the property currently is charged.
( 2 ) Use on other activities must be in the following order of priority: ( i ) Activities sponsored by DOE grants, cooperative agreements, or other assistance awards;
( ii ) Activities sponsored by other Federal agencies' grants, cooperative agreements, or other assistance awards;
( iii ) Activities under Federal procurement contracts or activities not sponsored by any Federal agency. If so used, use charges must be assessed to those activities. For real property or equipment, the use charges must be at rates equivalent to those for which comparable real property or equipment may be leased.
( d ) *Disposition or property.* Upon completion of the award, the recipient must submit to the contracting officer a final inventory of Federal owned property. DOE may: ( 1 ) Use the property to meet another Federal Government need (*e.g.,* by transferring accountability for the property to another Federal award to the same recipient, or by directing the recipient to transfer the property to a Federal agency that needs the property or to another recipient with a currently funded award).
( 2 ) Declare the property to be excess property and either: ( i ) Report the property to the General Services Administration through EADS, in accordance with the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949 (40 U.S.C. 483(b)(2)), as implemented by General Services Administration regulations at 41 CFR 101-47.202; or
( ii ) Dispose of the property by alternative methods, if there is authority under law, such as 15 U.S.C. 3710(i).
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED December 14, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-41236 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus TIMOTHY JEROME LUKE, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 2:04-CR-357-ALL

-------------------- Before KING, Chief Judge, and HIGGINBOTHAM and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Counsel appointed to represent Timothy Jerome Luke has requested leave to withdraw from this appeal and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of the brief, Luke’s response, and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2.