alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 950.10 Conditional agreement. ( a ) *Purpose.* The Department and a sponsor may enter into a Conditional Agreement. The Department will enter into a Standby Support Contract with the first six sponsors to satisfy the specified conditions precedent for a Standby Support Contract if and only if all funding and other contractual, statutory and regulatory requirements have been satisfied.
( b ) *Eligibility.* A sponsor is eligible to enter into a Conditional Agreement with the Program Administrator after the sponsor has submitted to the Department the following information but before the sponsor receives approval of the combined license application from the Commission: ( 1 ) An electronic copy of the combined license application docketed by the Commission pursuant to 10 CFR part 52, and if applicable, an electronic copy of the design certification or early site permit, or environmental report referenced or included with the sponsor's combined license application;
( 2 ) A summary schedule identifying the projected dates of construction, testing, and full power operation;
( 3 ) A detailed business plan that includes intended financing for the project including the credit structure and all sources and uses of funds for the project, the most recent private credit rating or other similar credit analysis for project related covered financing, and the projected cash flows for all debt obligations of the advanced nuclear facility which would be covered under the Standby Support Contract;
( 4 ) The sponsor's estimate of the amount and timing of the Standby Support payments for debt service under covered delays; and
( 5 ) The estimated dollar amount to be allocated to the sponsor's covered costs for principal or interest on the debt obligation of the advanced nuclear facility and for incremental costs, including whether these amounts would be different if the advanced nuclear facility is one of the initial two reactors or one of the subsequent four reactors.
( c ) The Program Administrator shall enter into a Conditional Agreement with a sponsor upon a determination by the Department that the sponsor is eligible for a Conditional Agreement, the information provided by the sponsor under paragraph (b) of this section is accurate and complete, and the Conditional Agreement is consistent with applicable laws and regulations.
Effective Date Note
Effective Date Note: At 71 FR 46325, Aug. 11, 2006, § 950.10 was revised. Paragraph (b) of this section contains information collection and recordkeeping requirements and will not become effective until approval has been given by the Office of Management and Budget.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                       3,465,269
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,953,043
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,876,247
<PP&E>                                       4,503,007
<DEPRECIATION>                             (2,012,303)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              14,785,263
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,091,713
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    345,455
<COMMON>                                       415,475
<OTHER-SE>                                   9,932,620
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                14,785,263
<SALES>                                      9,305,573
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             9,305,573
<CGS>                                        4,437,494
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,437,494
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             6,924,445
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              26,017
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (2,082,383)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (2,082,383)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (2,082,383)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.15)
        

</TABLE>
#### § 218.41 Violations.

Any practice that circumvents, contravenes or results in the circumvention or contravention of the requirements of any provision of this part 218 or any order issued pursuant thereto is a violation of the DOE regulations stated in this part and is unlawful.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-1533

DALLICE M. ALLEN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

WESTWINDS APARTMENTS; REBECCA COHEN; ALBERT

DAVIS, Individually and as Agents of Westwinds

Apartments for NHP Management Company,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Columbia. Matthew J. Perry, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-96-329-3-10BD)

Submitted: January 22, 1998 Decided: February 3, 1998

Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dallice M. Allen, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Wightman Dibble, Jr.,

MCNAIR LAW FIRM, P.A., Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order granting

summary judgment to Defendants in her civil action in which she

asserted that Defendants discriminated against her on the basis of

her race in connection with her housing and in initiating eviction

proceedings. We have reviewed the record and the district court's

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the

reasoning of the district court. Allen v. Westwinds Apartments,

No. CA-96-329-3-10BD (D.S.C. Apr. 18, 1997). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
IV 

House Calendar No. 152 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 641 

[Report No. 109–385] 

Requesting the President to provide to the House of Representatives certain 

documents in his possession relating to electronic surveillance without 

search warrants on individuals in the United States. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 18, 2005 

Ms. LEE submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Select 

Committee on Intelligence (Permanent Select) 

MARCH 7, 2006 

Additional sponsors: Mr. THOMPSON of Mississippi, Mr. MARKEY, Mr. CONYERS, Mr. PALLONE, Ms. MOORE of Wisconsin, Mr. HOLT, Mrs. 

CHRISTENSEN, Mr. STARK, Ms. SCHAKOWSKY, Ms. KILPATRICK of Michigan, Ms. WATSON, Mr. CLEAVER, Mrs. TAUSCHER, Ms. LINDA T. 

SA ́NCHEZ of California, Ms. BALDWIN, Mr. CLAY, Mr. DEFAZIO, Ms. 

JACKSON-LEE of Texas, Ms. NORTON, Mrs. JONES of Ohio, Ms. WATERS, Mr. LEWIS of Georgia, Mr. TOWNS, Ms. WOOLSEY, Mr. AL GREEN

of Texas, Mr. DAVIS of Illinois, Mr. MEEKS of New York, Mr. WATT, 

and Mr. OWENS

MARCH 7, 2006 

Reported adversely from the Select Committee on Intelligence, referred to the 

House Calendar, and ordered to be printed 

RESOLUTION 

Requesting the President to provide to the House of Representatives certain documents in his possession relating 


dsatterwhite on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 641 RH 

to electronic surveillance without search warrants on individuals in the United States. 

1 Resolved, That the President is requested to provide 

2 to the House of Representatives, not later than 14 days 

3 after the date of the adoption of this resolution, all docu4 ments in the possession of the President, including tele5 phone and electronic mail records, logs, calendars, min6 utes, memoranda, and advisory legal opinions on, and 

7 identities of all individuals subject to, electronic surveil8 lance without search warrants by the National Security 

9 Agency within the United States since September 11, 

10 2001. 


dsatterwhite on PROD1PC76 with BILLS

dsatterwhite on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
House Calendar No. 152 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 641 

[Report No. 109

–385] 

RESOLUTION 

Requesting the President to provide to the House 

States. search warrants on individuals in the United session relating to electronic surveillance without of Representatives certain documents in his posMARCH 7, 2006 

Reported adversely, referred to the House Calendar, and 

ordered to be printed 


dsatterwhite on PROD1PC76 with BILLS
§ 719.45 Are there any special procedures or requirements regarding subcontractor and retrospective insurance carrier legal costs? ( a ) The contractor shall establish a monitoring system for significant matters in litigation which are handled by subcontractors other than retrospective insurance carriers whose contracts provide for the reimbursement of legal costs. The purpose of this monitoring system is to enable the contractor to be regularly informed of the progress of the Significant Matter, to monitor the associated costs and help ensure that they are reasonable, and to report on the progress of the Significant Matter and the associated costs to Department Counsel.
( b ) The contractor shall require retrospective insurance carriers and other subcontractors whose contracts provide for the reimbursement of legal costs to request prior permission from the contractor to enter into a settlement agreement with, or make any payments to, claimants or third-parties if: ( 1 ) In the case of a subcontractor other than a retrospective insurance carrier, the settlement or payment amount is likely to reach $25,000 or more; or
( 2 ) In the case of a retrospective insurance carrier, the settlement or payment amount is likely to reach $100,000 or more.
( c ) The contractor shall require the insurance carrier or other subcontractor to submit all documentation described in § 719.34 and to provide the contractor with a copy of the executed settlement agreement within seven days of execution, which the contractor will promptly forward to Department Counsel. The contractor shall not authorize the subcontractor to enter into a settlement agreement or make a payment to a claimant or third-party that is likely to reach or exceed the above-stated threshold amounts without first obtaining the approval of the Department Counsel.
( d ) Upon request from Department Counsel, the Contracting Officer, or other authorized representative of the Department, the contractor shall provide detailed cost information regarding particular legal matters handled by retrospective insurance carriers or other subcontractors whose contracts provide for the reimbursement of legal costs.
( e ) The contractor shall provide reviewed costs and status updates for all significant matters in litigation handled by subcontractors whose contracts provide for the reimbursement of legal costs in accordance with § 719.51. The contractor is not required to provide cost and status updates for matters handled by retrospective insurance carriers except upon the written request of the cognizant Contracting Officer or Department Counsel.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-1598
WILLIAM REESE, Petitioner - Appellant, versus COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States Tax Court. (Tax Ct. No. 1174-05L) Submitted: September 28, 2006 Decided: October 4, 2006 Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. William Reese, Appellant Pro Se. Eileen J. O’CONNOR Assistant Attorney General, Richard Farber, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C.; Donald L. Korb, IN TERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: William Reese appeals the tax court’s order granting summary judgment and allowing the Commissioner of Internal Revenue to proceed with its collection of Reese’s tax liabilities for the 1988 to 1992 tax years. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the tax court. Reese v. Comm’r of Internal Revenue , No. 1174-05L (U.S.T.C. Feb. 9, 2006). We deny Reese’s motion to vacate our order allowing the Commissioner additional time to file an informal brief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 99.2




                        President's Written Certification
                             Of Financial Statements
                       Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Statute 1350



     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Statute 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity
as president of Ridgefield Acquisition Corp. (the "Company") that

     (a)  the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-QSB for the period ended
          June 30, 2003 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
          the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

     (b)  the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end
          of such period and the results of operations of the Company for such
          period.




                                            /s/ Steven N. Bronson
                                            ----------------------------------
                                            Steven N. Bronson, President
#### Louis E. Enfeld, Respondent, v. Hemmerdinger Estate Corporation, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered December 15, 1969, which denied its motion for summary judgment. Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion granted. Plaintiff seeks $25,000 for services rendered to defendant pursuant *981to an alleged oral contract under which he was to suggest possible terms and conditions and consult with and advise defendant with respect to the possible sale of defendant’s interest in premises known as Terminal Warehouse. The acts allegedly performed by plaintiff clearly fall within subdivision 10 of section 5-701 of the General Obligations Law and thus the alleged agreement is void unless there is a written memorandum thereof. Since plaintiff concedes that there is no written memorandum, the motion for summary judgment should have been granted. Furthermore, plaintiff’s failure to comply with section 442-d of the Real Property Law precludes a recovery herein *(Sorice*v. *DuBois,*25 A D 2d 521). Hopkins, Acting P. J., Munder, Martuscello, Brennan and Benjamin, JJ., concur.
§ 830.206 Preliminary documented safety analysis. Prior to construction of a new Hazard Category 1, 2, or 3 DOE nuclear facility or a major modification to an existing Hazard Category 1, 2, or 3 DOE nuclear facility, the contractor responsible for the design and construction of the new facility or major modification must: ( a ) Prepare a preliminary documented safety analysis for the facility, and
( b ) Obtain DOE approval of: ( 1 ) The nuclear safety design criteria to be used in preparing the preliminary documented safety analysis unless the contractor uses the design criteria in DOE Order 420.1, *Facility Safety,* or successor document; and
( 2 ) The preliminary documented safety analysis before the contractor can procure materials or components or begin construction; provided that DOE may authorize the contractor to perform limited procurement and construction activities without approval of a preliminary documented safety analysis if DOE determines that the activities are not detrimental to public health and safety and are in the best interests of DOE.
Exhibit 32



                        President's Written Certification
                             Of Financial Statements
                       Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Statute 1350



     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Statute 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity
as president of Ridgefield Acquisition Corp. (the "Company") that

     (a)  the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-QSB for the period
          ended March 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section
          13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

     (b)  the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end
          of such period and the results of operations of the Company for such
          period.


Dated: May 13, 2005


                                            /s/ Steven N. Bronson
                                            ----------------------------------
                                            Steven N. Bronson, President
937 A.2d 209

#### In re ADOPTION/GUARDIANSHIP OF LAMONT J.

No. 100

Sept. Term, 2007.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Dec. 12, 2007.

*532Julia Doyle Bernhardt, Asst. Public Defender (Nancy S. Forster, Public Defender), Baltimore, for petitioner.

Leslie K. Ridgway, Asst. Atty. Gen. (Douglas F. Gansler, Atty. Gen. of MD), Baltimore; Marianna I. Burt (Lazarus & Burt, P.A.), Rockville, for respondent.

SUBMITTED BEFORE: BELL, C.J., RAKER, HARRELL, BATTAGLIA and GREENE, JJ.

PER CURIAM

ORDER

The Court having considered and granted the petition for writ of certiorari in the above captioned case, it is this 12th day of December, 2007,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the judgment of the Court of Special Appeals be, and it is hereby, vacated, and the case is remanded to that Court for reconsideration in light of *In re Adoption/Guardianship of Rashawn H. and Tyrese H.,*402 Md. 477, 937 A.2d 177, 2007 WL 4303496 (2007). Costs in this Court to be paid by respondent, and costs in the Court of Special Appeals to abide the result.
From: "Bill Batchelor" <bill-batchelor@tamu.edu>

To: "'Kavya Kasturi'" <Kavya.Kasturi@erg.com>

Date: 3/30/2010 5:04 PM

Subject: Dissertation

Kavya Kasturi:

I talked to Dong Suk Han and he has agreed to allow me to send you a copy of

his dissertation for your use in developing a report to EPA regarding

technologies for treating power plan wastewaters. Because of the size of

the file, I will not attach it to this email. However, you can download it

at http://batchelor.tamu.edu/files/. Please let me know when you have

downloaded the file, so that I can remove it. Good luck with your work.

Bill Batchelor

Zachry Dept. of Civil Engineering 979.845.1304

Texas A&M University 979.862.1542 (fax)

3136 TAMU

bill-batchelor@tamu.edu

College Station, TX 77843-3136 http://batchelor.tamu.edu/bill/
# EUR-Lex - 31974D0491 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31974D0491

**74/491/EEC: Commission Decision of 17 September 1974 exempting the Kingdom of Denmark from applying to certain species the Council Directive of 30 June 1969 on the marketing of seed of oil and fibre plants (Only the Danish text is authentic) **

*
Official Journal L 267 , 03/10/1974 P. 0018 - 0018 *

COMMISSION DECISION of 17 September 1974 exempting the Kingdom of Denmark from applying to certain species the Council Directive of 30 June 1969 on the marketing of seed of oil and fibre plants (Only the Danish text is authentic) (74/491/EEC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community;

Having regard to the Council Directive of 30 June 1969 (1) on the marketing of seed of oil and fibre plants, as last amended by the Council Directive of 11 December 1973 (2), and in particular Article 22 thereof;

Having regard to the request submitted by the Kingdom of Denmark;

Whereas groundnut, hemp, soya bean, cotton and sunflower are species not normally cultivated in the Kingdom of Denmark ; whereas the seeds of these species are not propagated or marketed there;

Whereas for as long as these conditions obtain it is appropriate to exempt the Kingdom of Denmark from applying the provisions of this Directive to the species in question;

Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the Opinion of the Standing Committee on Seeds and Propagating Material for Agriculture, Horticulture and Forestry,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The Kingdom of Denmark is exempted from applying the Council Directive of 30 June 1969 on the marketing of seed of oil and fibre plants, with the exception of the provisions of Article 13 (1), thereof, to the species listed below.

>PIC FILE= "T9000635">

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Kingdom of Denmark.

Done at Brussels, 17 September 1974.

For the Commission

The President

François-Xavier ORTOLI

(1)OJ No L 169, 10.7.1969, p. 3. (2)OJ No L 356, 27.12.1973, p. 79.
§ 75.44 Timing of advance notification. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, notification to the Commission, when required by § 75.43, must be given: ( 1 ) In the case of exports and domestic transfers, at least 20 days in advance of the preparation of the nuclear material for shipment from the facility.
( 2 ) In the case of imports, at least 12 days in advance of the unpacking of nuclear material at the facility.
( b ) For a particular receipt or shipment of nuclear material, the Commission will approve a shorter notice period than that specified by paragraph (a) of this section, for good cause, if it determines that observing the specified notification period would result in delay in shipment or unpackaging.
( c ) The licensee shall inform the Commission, by phone, as soon as possible, with respect to any delay in the receipt (or unpackaging) or the shipment (or preparation for shipment) of nuclear material for which advance notification is required. New dates should be provided, if known.
[45 FR 50711, July 31, 1980, as amended at 73 FR 78614, Dec. 23, 2008]
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 671 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 671

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                      February 8, 2006.
    Resolved, That the following named Members be, and they are hereby, elected 
to the following standing committees of the House of Representatives:
    Committee on Appropriations: Mr. DeLay to rank after Mr. Wolf.
    Committee on the Budget: Mr. Campbell.
    Committee on Energy and Commerce: Mr. Blunt to rank after Mr. Fossella.
    Committee on Financial Services: Mr. Campbell.
    Committee on Veterans' Affairs: Mr. Campbell.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```