alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> BD
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998             SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                               0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  925,285               2,205,979
<SECURITIES-RESALE>                                  0                       0
<SECURITIES-BORROWED>                                0                       0
<INSTRUMENTS-OWNED>                         10,055,498               8,843,349
<PP&E>                                               0                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,980,783              11,049,328
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0                       0
<PAYABLES>                                      57,598                 184,542
<REPOS-SOLD>                                         0                       0
<SECURITIES-LOANED>                                  0                       0
<INSTRUMENTS-SOLD>                                   0                       0
<LONG-TERM>                                          0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             0                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                  10,923,185              10,864,786
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,980,783              11,049,328
<TRADING-REVENUE>                              416,566               1,770,613
<INTEREST-DIVIDENDS>                           460,638                 433,026
<COMMISSIONS>                                  207,782                 220,548
<INVESTMENT-BANKING-REVENUES>                        0                       0
<FEE-REVENUE>                                        0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0
<COMPENSATION>                                       0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                663,728               1,983,091
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     663,728               1,983,091
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   663,728               1,983,091
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    17.08                   47.74
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    17.08                   47.74
        

</TABLE>
[J-80-2014]

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

SAYLOR, C.J., EAKIN, BAER, TODD, STEVENS, JJ.

**COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,**

**Appellee**

**v.**

**THOMAS MEADOWS,**

**Appellant :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 689 CAP** 

**Appeal from the Order of 09/24/2013 (docketed on 09/25/2013) in the Court of**  **Common Pleas, Criminal Division of Montgomery County at No.** 

**CP-46-CR-0001869-1990.**

**SUBMITTED: July 31, 2014**

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 17th day of February, 2015, the Order of the Court of Common** 

**Pleas of Montgomery County, dismissing appellant’s secon d petition for relief under the** 

**Post-Conviction Relief Act (PCRA), is hereby** AFFIRMED

**.**
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

October 12, 2018

No. 04-18-00317-CV

Teresa M. FAYETTE,

Appellant

v.

Luciano REYES and ABC Trucking,

Appellees

From the 37th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015CI04948

Honorable Michael E. Mery, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

After this court granted court reporter Amy L. Hinds’s first request for an extension of 

time to file the record, the reporter’s record was due on October 5, 2018.

After the extended due date, the court reporter filed a second notification of late record, 

indicated the record would comprise approximately 500 pages, and subsequently filed a report 

describing the status of the record. 

The court reporter’s request is GRANTED. The reporter’s record is due to be filed with 

this court by November 5, 2018. See id. R. 35.3(c) (limiting an extension in an ordinary appeal 

to thirty days). 

If the reporter’s record is not filed with this court by November 5, 2018, any requests for 

additional time to file the record must be accompanied by a signed, written status report. 

The report must describe the transcript by day with the date, description, page counts, and 

remarks for each day. The page counts must include the total number of pages, the number of

pages edited, proofread, and formatted into the required electronic form (including bookmarks). 

The report may describe any unusual aspects of the record. The report must describe any 

problems the court reporter reasonably believes may delay the completion of the record beyond 

the requested date. 
A preferred form for the status report, with an accompanying example, is attached to this 

order.

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 12th day of October, 2018.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
#### § 431.425 Consolidation.

DOE may consolidate any or all matters at issue in two or more proceedings docketed where there exist common parties, common questions of fact and law, and where such consolidation would expedite or simplify consideration of the issues. Consolidation shall not affect the right of any party to raise issues that could have been raised if consolidation had not occurred.
§ 95.63 Criminal penalties. ( a ) Section 223 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, provides for criminal sanctions for willful violation of, attempted violation of, or conspiracy to violate, any regulation issued under sections 161b, 161i, or 161o of the Act. For purposes of section 223, all the regulations in part 95 are issued under one or more of sections 161b, 161i, or 161o, except for the sections listed in paragraph (b) of this section.
( b ) The regulations in part 95 that are not issued under sections 161b, 161i, or 161o for the purposes of section 223 are as follows: §§ 95.1, 95.3, 95.5, 95.7, 95.8, 95.9, 95.11, 95.17, 95.19, 95.21, 95.23, 95.55, 95.59, 95.61, and 95.63.
[57 FR 55080, Nov. 24, 1992]
Editorial Note on Part 851
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 851 appear at 88 FR 41293, June 26, 2023.

§ 851.5 Enforcement. ( a ) A contractor that is indemnified under section 170d. of the AEA (or any subcontractor or supplier thereto) and that violates (or whose employee violates) any requirement of this part shall be subject to a civil penalty of up to $118,790 for each such violation. If any violation under this subsection is a continuing violation, each day of the violation shall constitute a separate violation for the purpose of computing the civil penalty.
( b ) A contractor that violates any requirement of this part may be subject to a reduction in fees or other payments under a contract with DOE, pursuant to the contract's *Conditional Payment of Fee* clause, or other contract clause providing for such reductions.
( c ) DOE may not penalize a contractor under both paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section for the same violation of a requirement of this part.
( d ) For contractors listed in subsection d. of section 234A of the AEA, 42 U.S.C. 2282a(d), the total amount of civil penalties under paragraph (a) and contract penalties under paragraph (b) of this section may not exceed the total amount of fees paid by DOE to the contractor in that fiscal year.
( e ) DOE shall not penalize a contractor under both sections 234A and 234C of the AEA for the same violation.
( f ) DOE enforcement actions through civil penalties under paragraph (a) of this section, start on February 9, 2007.
[71 FR 6931, Feb. 9, 2006, as amended at 74 FR 66033, Dec. 14, 2009; 79 FR 20, Jan. 2, 2014; 81 FR 41795, June 28, 2016; 81 FR 96352, Dec. 30, 2016; 83 FR 1292, Jan. 11, 2018; 83 FR 66084, Dec. 26, 2018; 85 FR 831, Jan. 8, 2020; 86 FR 2956, Jan. 14, 2021; 87 FR 1064, Jan. 10, 2022; 88 FR 2194, Jan. 13, 2023; 89 FR 1029, Jan. 9, 2024]
#### In re McEWEN.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

January 8, 1915.)

In the matter of the application of Frank J. McEwen for admission to the bar.

No opinion. Application granted.
# EUR-Lex - 31985R3562 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31985R3562

**Commission Regulation (EEC) No 3562/85 of 17 December 1985 correcting Regulation (EEC) No 3143/85 with respect to the statements appearing on packs of concentrated butter **

*
Official Journal L 339 , 18/12/1985 P. 0034 - 0034 Spanish special edition: Chapter 03 Volume 39 P. 0141 Portuguese special edition Chapter 03 Volume 39 P. 0141 Finnish special edition: Chapter 3 Volume 19 P. 0237 Swedish special edition: Chapter 3 Volume 19 P. 0237 *

*****

COMMISSION REGULATION (EEC) No 3562/85

of 17 December 1985

correcting Regulation (EEC) No 3143/85 with respect to the statements appearing on packs of concentrated butter

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 804/68 of 27 June 1968 on the common organization of the market in milk and milk products (1), as last amended by Regulation (EEC) No 1298/85 (2), and in particular Article 6 (7) thereof,

Whereas Commission Regulation (EEC) No 3143/85 of 11 November 1985 on the sale at reduced prices of intervention butter intended for direct consumption in the form of concentrated butter (3), as last amended by Regulation (EEC) No 3338/85 (4), provides that packs of concentrated butter must bear, in clear and legible print, certain statements; whereas, as a result of an error, the statement in the Italian language does not correspond to the statement adopted in the text submitted for voting to the Management Committee for Milk and Milk products; whereas the Regulation should therefore be corrected,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The penultimate indent of the first subparagraph of Article 5 (4) is replaced by the following:

' - burro concentrato'.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 17 December 1985.

For the Commission

Frans ANDRIESSEN

Vice-President

(1) OJ No L 148, 28. 6. 1968, p. 13.

(2) OJ No L 137, 27. 5. 1985, p. 5.

(3) OJ No L 298, 12. 11. 1985, p. 9.

(4) OJ No L 318, 29. 11. 1985, p. 13.
<PAGE>   1
                                                            Exhibit 10.4 (c)

                                 AMENDMENT NO. 2
                                       TO
                          SPECIAL TERMINATION AGREEMENT


         THIS AMENDMENT No. 2, dated as of April 16, 1998, to that certain
Special Termination Agreement (the "Agreement") that was amended and restated as
of the 31st day of January, 1997 and previously amended as of July 1, 1997, by
and among Abington Bancorp, Inc., a Massachusetts corporation, Abington Savings
Bank, a Massachusetts savings bank, and Mario A. Berlinghieri, an individual
currently employed by the Company and the Bank in the capacity of Senior Vice
President.

         NOW, THEREFORE, the parties to the Agreement hereby agree to amend the
Agreement as follows:

         1. Paragraph 4 of the Agreement is hereby deleted and the following new
Paragraph 4 inserted in lieu thereof:

                  4. SEVERANCE PAYMENT. In the event a Terminating Event occurs
         within three (3) years after a Change in Control, the Employers shall
         pay to the Executive an amount equal to (x) three times the "base
         amount" (as defined in section 280G(b)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code
         of 1986, as amended (the "Code")) applicable to the Executive, less (y)
         One Dollar ($1.00), payable in one lump-sum payment on the date of
         termination.

         2. As amended by this Amendment, the Agreement shall continue in full
force and effect in accordance with its terms.

         3. This Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts, all of
which taken together shall constitute one and the same instrument, and any of
the parties hereto may execute this Amendment by signing any such counterpart.

         4. This Amendment shall be governed by, and construed and enforced in
accordance with, the substantive laws of The Commonwealth of Massachusetts,
without regard to its principles of conflicts of laws.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment as of the
day and year first above written.


ABINGTON SAVINGS BANK                        ABINGTON BANCORP, INC.



By:                                          By:
  ------------------------------                -------------------------------
   Its                                          Its


                                                -------------------------------
                                                Mario A. Berlinghieri
**Pennsylvania**

**Pennsylvania 6 Indiana**
§ 835.604 Exceptions to posting requirements. ( a ) Areas may be excepted from the posting requirements of § 835.603 for periods of less than 8 continuous hours when placed under continuous observation and control of an individual knowledgeable of, and empowered to implement, required access and exposure control measures.
( b ) Areas may be excepted from the radioactive material area posting requirements of § 835.603(g) when: ( 1 ) Posted in accordance with §§ 835.603(a) through (f); or
( 2 ) Each item or container of radioactive material is labeled in accordance with this subpart such that individuals entering the area are made aware of the hazard; or
( 3 ) The radioactive material of concern consists solely of structures or installed components which have been activated (i.e., such as by being exposed to neutron radiation or particles produced by an accelerator).
( c ) Areas containing only packages received from radioactive material transportation labeled and in non-degraded condition need not be posted in accordance with § 835.603 until the packages are monitored in accordance with § 835.405.
[63 FR 59684, Nov. 4, 1998]
Exhibit 34.1



| |  |  |  |  |  |     
| |  |  |  |  |  | ----
| |  |  |  |  |  | LOGO

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors of VW Credit, Inc. and

Deutsche Bank
Trust Company Americas, Indenture Trustee:

We have examined VW Credit, Incs (the Company) compliance with the servicing criteria set
forth in Title 17, Section 229.1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commissions Regulation AB for the Companys Volkswagen Auto Loan Enhanced Trust 2013-1 (the Trust) asset backed securitization transactions except for
the servicing criteria set forth in Sections 229.1122(d)(1)(ii)-(iv), 229.1122(d)(2)(vi), 229.1122(d)(4)(ix)-(xiii), and 229.1122(d)(4)(xv), which the Company has determined are not applicable to the activities it performs with respect to the asset
backed securities transactions being serviced as of December 31, 2013 and for the period from February 27, 2013 (date of issuance) through December 31, 2013 (the Reporting Period). Management is responsible for the
Companys compliance with those servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Companys compliance based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included
examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Companys compliance with the servicing criteria specified above and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing selected
asset-backed transactions and securities of the Trust, testing selected servicing activities related to the Trust, and determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with
the servicing criteria. Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to determine whether errors
may have occurred either prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We
believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Companys compliance with the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, VW Credit, Inc. complied, in all material respects, with the aforementioned servicing criteria as of and for the reporting period ended
December 31, 2013.

/s/ Baker Tilly Virchow Krause, LLP

Southfield, Michigan

March 28, 2014



LOGO
Exhibit 13.2 Certification of the Principal Financial OfficerPursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002 In connection with the annual report of Ambev S.A. (the Company) on Form 20–F for the year ended December 31, 2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, or the Report, I, Nelson José Jamel, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes–Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Date: March 24, 2014 /s/ Nelson José Jamel Name: Nelson José Jamel Title:    Chief Financial Officer  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# L_2023240EN.01008301.xml

| 28.9.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 240/83 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.9.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 240/83

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE No 215/2020

of 11 December 2020

amending Annex IX (Financial services) to the EEA Agreement [2023/2017]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (“the EEA Agreement”), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/1689 of 29 May 2019 correcting the Romanian language version of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/1229 supplementing Regulation (EU) No 909/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to regulatory technical standards on settlement discipline (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/1689 of 29 May 2019 correcting the Romanian language version of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/1229 supplementing Regulation (EU) No 909/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to regulatory technical standards on settlement discipline (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex IX to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex IX to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following is added in point 31bfh (Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/1229) of Annex IX to the EEA Agreement:

‘, as amended by:

| — | 32019 R 1689: Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/1689 of 29 May 2019 (OJ L 259, 10.10.2019, p. 1).’ |
| --- | --- |

—

32019 R 1689: Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/1689 of 29 May 2019 (OJ L 259, 10.10.2019, p. 1).’

Article 2

The text of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/1689 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 12 December 2020, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 11 December 2020.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Sabine MONAUNI

---

(1)  
  OJ L 259, 10.10.2019, p. 1.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
# EUR-Lex - 31977D0271 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31977D0271

**77/271/Euratom: Council Decision of 29 March 1977 on the implementation of Decision 77/270/Euratom empowering the Commission to issue Euratom loans for the purpose of contributing to the financing of nuclear power stations **

*
Official Journal L 088 , 06/04/1977 P. 0011 - 0011 Greek special edition: Chapter 10 Volume 1 P. 0121 Spanish special edition: Chapter 12 Volume 3 P. 0026 Portuguese special edition Chapter 12 Volume 3 P. 0026 Finnish special edition: Chapter 10 Volume 1 P. 0013 Swedish special edition: Chapter 10 Volume 1 P. 0013 *

COUNCIL DECISION of 29 March 1977 on the implementation of Decision 77/270/Euratom empowering the Commission to issue Euratom loans for the purpose of contributing to the financing of nuclear power stations (77/271/Euratom)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community,

Having regard to Council Decision 77/270/Euratom of 29 March 1977 empowering the Commission to issue Euratom loans for the purpose of contributing to the financing of nuclear power stations (1), and in particular Article 1 thereof,

Whereas the maximum amount of the loans which the Commission is empowered to issue on behalf of the European Atomic Energy Community should be fixed at 500 million European units of account;

Whereas the Commission should inform the Council accordingly when the total value of the transactions effected has reached 300 million European units of account, so that the Council may decide, in the light of experience gained, on the fixing of a new amount,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Sole Article

Loans as provided for in Article 1 of Decision 77/270/Euratom may be contracted for amounts the total of which shall not exceed 500 million European units of account ; the European unit of account is defined in Decision 75/250/EEC (2).

When the total value of the transactions effected reaches 300 million European units of account, the Commission shall inform the Council which, acting unanimously, shall decide on the fixing of a new amount as soon as possible.

Done at Brussels, 29 March 1977.

For the Council

The President

T. BENN (1)See page 9 of this Official Journal. (2)OJ No L 104, 24.4.1975, p. 35.