alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
C__C. 

# depwestvirginiadepartmentofenvironmentalprotectionDivisionofAirQualityEarlRayTomblin,Governor60157thSTSERandyC.Huffman,CabinetSecretaryCharleston,WV24304dep.wv.govFebruary14,2011Ms.DianaEsher,Director12011RECEIVEDAirProtectionDivisionip3OU.S.EPARegion3FEB1520111650ArchStreet(3APOO)DivisionDirectorC3APOO)Philadelphia,PA19103-2029Re:CleanDataShowingAttainmentofthe2006PM2.5NAAQSfortheWestVirginiaNonattainmentAreasofCharlestonandWeirtonDearMs:Asyouknow,WestVirginiahastwoareasthatarepresentlydesignatednonattainmentforthe2006PM2.524-hourairqualitystandardof35jig/m3.Baseduponthemostrecent2008-2010monitoringdatacertifiedinEPA’sAirQualitySystem(AQS),boththoseareasarenowattainingthestandard.Infact,Charlestonalsometthestandardduring2007-2009at32tg/m.For2008-2010,thedesignvalueforCharlestonisandforWeirtonis31tg/m.Likewise,theannualstandardisbeingmetinbothareaswiththedesignvalueforCharlestonat13.2g/iandforWeirtonat13.7ig/m3.DataavailableinAQSdoesnotindicateanyviolationsinthecorrespondingportionsofadjacentstates.ThefederalPM2.5ImplementationRulestates:(c)UponadeterminationbyEPAthatanareadesignatednonattainmentforthePM2.5NAAQShasattainedthestandard,therequirementsforsuchareatosubmitattainmentdemonstrationsandassociatedreasonablyavailablecontrolmeasures,reasonablefurtherprogressplans,contingencymeasures,andotherplanningSIPsrelatedtoattainmentofthePM2.5NAAQSshallbesuspendeduntilsuchtimeas:theareaisredesignatedtoattainment,atwhichtimetherequirementsnolongerapply;orEPAdeterminesthattheareahasviolatedthePM25NAAQS,atwhichtimetheareaisagainrequiredtosubmitsuchplans.[72FR20665,April25,2007;40CFR51.1004(c)jPromotingahealthyenvironment.4LettertoDianaEsherFebruary14,2011Page2



# C

CTherefore,werequestEPAtoactinatimelymannertomakeaformalfindingthatthesetwoareasareattainingthe2006PM2.5standardsandthattheirobligationtosubmitrelatedattainmentSIPsandotherlisteditemsaresuspendedinaccordancewiththefederalPM2.5ImplementationRule.Ifyouoryourstaffhaveanyquestionsorwouldlikeadditionalinformation,pleasefeelfreetocontactmeat(304)926-0462orFredDurham,DeputyDirector,at(304)926-0499ext.1242.cc:CristinaFernandezMarilynPowers-DivisionofAirQuality
#### ERLANGER v. SULLIVAN et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

February 11, 1915.)

Action by Abraham L. Erlanger against Patrick H. Sullivan and others.

No opinion. Motion to dismiss appeal granted, with $10 costs. Order filed.
§ 820.3 Separation of functions. ( a ) *Separation of functions.* After a respondent requests an on-the-record adjudication of an assessment of a civil penalty contained in a Final Notice of Violation, no person shall participate in a decision-making function in an enforcement proceeding if he has been, is or will be responsible for an investigative or prosecutorial function related to that proceeding or if he reports to the person responsible for the investigative or prosecutorial function.
( b ) *Director.* The Director shall be responsible for the investigation and prosecution of violations of the DOE Nuclear Safety Requirements. After the request for an enforcement adjudication, the Director shall not discuss *ex parte* the merits of the proceeding with a DOE Official or any person likely to advise the DOE Official in the decision of the proceeding.
( c ) *Presiding Officer.* A Presiding Officer shall perform no duties inconsistent with his responsibilities as a Presiding Officer, and will not be responsible to or subject to the supervision or direction of any officer or employee engaged in the performance of an investigative or prosecutorial function. The Presiding Officer may not consult any person other than a member of his staff or a special assistant on any fact at issue unless on notice and opportunity for all parties to participate, except as required for the disposition of *ex parte* matters as authorized by law.
§ 850.30 Housekeeping. ( a ) Where beryllium is present in operational areas of DOE facilities, the responsible employer must conduct routine surface sampling to determine housekeeping conditions. Surfaces contaminated with beryllium dusts and waste must not exceed a removable contamination level of 3 μg/100 cm2 during non-operational periods. This sampling would not include the interior of installed closed systems such as enclosures, glove boxes, chambers, or ventilation systems.
( b ) When cleaning floors and surfaces in areas where beryllium is present at DOE facilities, the responsible employer must clean beryllium-contaminated floors and surfaces using a wet method, vacuuming or other cleaning methods, such as sticky tack cloths, that avoid the production of airborne dust. Compressed air or dry methods must not be used for such cleaning.
( c ) The responsible employer must equip the portable or mobile vacuum units that are used to clean beryllium-contaminated areas with HEPA filters, and change the filters as often as needed to maintain their capture efficiency.
( d ) The responsible employer must ensure that the cleaning equipment that is used to clean beryllium-contaminated surfaces is labeled, controlled, and not used for non-hazardous materials.
Editorial Note on Part 712
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 712 appear at 88 FR 41292, June 26, 2023.

§ 712.11 General requirements for HRP certification. ( a ) The following requirements apply to each individual applying for or in an HRP position: ( 1 ) A DOE “Q” access authorization;
( 2 ) Signed releases, acknowledgments, and waivers to participate in the HRP on forms provided by DOE;
( 3 ) Completion of initial and annual HRP instruction as provided in § 712.17;
( 4 ) Successful completion of an initial and annual supervisory review, medical assessment, management evaluation, and a DOE personnel security review;
( 5 ) No use of any hallucinogen in the preceding 5 years and no experience of flashback resulting from the use of any hallucinogen more than 5 years before applying for certification or recertification;
( 6 ) An initial drug test and random drug tests for the use of illegal drugs at least once each 12 months;
( 7 ) An initial alcohol test and random alcohol tests at least once each 12 months; and
( 8 ) For designated positions, identified pursuant to 10 CFR part 709, successful completion of a counterintelligence evaluation, which may include a counterintelligence-scope polygraph examination in accordance with DOE's Polygraph Examination Regulation, 10 CFR part 709, and any subsequent revisions to that regulation.
( b ) Each HRP candidate must be certified in the HRP before being assigned to HRP duties and must be recertified annually, not to exceed 12 months between recertifications.
( c ) Individuals in newly identified HRP positions must immediately sign the releases, acknowledgments, and waivers to participate in the HRP and complete initial instruction on the importance of security, safety, reliability, and suitability. If these requirements are not met, the individual must be removed from the HRP position. All remaining HRP requirements listed in paragraph (a) of this section must be completed in an expedited manner.
( d ) Alcohol consumption is prohibited within an eight-hour period preceding scheduled work for individuals performing nuclear explosive duties and for individuals in specific positions designated by either the Manager, the NNSA Administrator, his or her designee, or the appropriate Lead Program Secretarial Officer, or his or her designee.
( e ) Individuals reporting for unscheduled nuclear explosive duties and those specific positions designated by either the Manager, the NNSA Administrator or his or her designee, or the appropriate Lead Program Secretarial Officer, or his or her designee, will be asked prior to performing any type of work if they have consumed alcohol within the preceding eight-hour period. If they answer “no,” they may perform their assigned duties but still may be tested.
( f ) Any doubt as to an HRP candidate's or HRP certified individual's eligibility for certification shall be resolved against the candidate or individual in favor of national security and/or safety.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 793 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 793

 To amend the National Security Act of 1947 to provide for additional 
   requirements relating to the regular attendees of meetings of the 
             National Security Council and bodies thereof.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 1, 2017

 Mr. Larsen of Washington (for himself, Mr. Aguilar, Mr. Carbajal, Mr. 
  Connolly, Mr. Cooper, Mr. Courtney, Ms. DelBene, Mr. Garamendi, Mr. 
  Heck, Mr. Kilmer, Mr. O'Halleran, Mr. Perlmutter, Mr. Walz, and Mr. 
  McGovern) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
   Committee on Armed Services, and in addition to the Committees on 
 Foreign Affairs, and Intelligence (Permanent Select), for a period to 
      be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for 
consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the 
                          committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the National Security Act of 1947 to provide for additional 
   requirements relating to the regular attendees of meetings of the 
             National Security Council and bodies thereof.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Ensuring Sound Military and 
Intelligence Advice Act of 2017''.

SEC. 2. DESIGNATION OF REGULAR ATTENDEES OF MEETINGS OF NATIONAL 
              SECURITY COUNCIL AND BODIES THEREOF.

    Section 101(c)(2) of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 
3021) is amended by adding at the end the following new sentence: ``If 
any individual whose responsibilities are primarily political is 
designated as a regular attendee of meetings of the National Security 
Council or of any body of the National Security Council, including the 
Principals Committee, then the Director of National Intelligence and 
the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff shall also be designated as 
regular attendees of such Council or body.''.
                                 <all>
```
Editorial Note on Part 61
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 61 appear at 80 FR 74980, Dec. 1, 2015, and at 81 FR 86909, Dec. 2, 2016.

§ 61.32 Facility information and verification. ( a ) In response to a written request by the Commission, each applicant for a license and each recipient of a license shall submit facility information, as described in § 75.10 of this chapter, on IAEA Design Information Questionnaire forms and site information on DOC/NRC Form AP-A, and associated forms;
( b ) As required by the Additional Protocol, applicants and licensees specified in paragraph (a) of this section shall submit location information described in § 75.11 of this chapter on DOC/NRC Form AP-1 and associated forms; and
( c ) Shall permit verification thereof by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and take other action as necessary to implement the US/IAEA Safeguards Agreement, as described in Part 75 of this chapter.
[73 FR 78606, Dec. 23, 2008, as amended at 85 FR 65663, Oct. 16, 2020]
]
# L_2008113EN.01002301.xml

| 25.4.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 113/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.4.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 113/23

---

Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2237/77 of 23 September 1977 amending Regulation No 118/66/EEC on the form of farm return to be used for the purpose of determining incomes of agricultural holdings

(
  Official Journal of the European Communities L 263 of 17 October 1977, p. 1
  )

In the Contents on the cover and on page 1 in the title:

for:

‘Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2237/77 of 23 September 1977 amending Regulation No 118/66/EEC on the form of farm return to be used for the purpose of determining incomes of agricultural holdings’,

read:

‘Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2237/77 of 23 September 1977 on the form of farm return to be used for the purpose of determining incomes of agricultural holdings’.

---
#### In re GRADE CROSSING COM’RS OF CITY OF BUFFALO.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

January 20, 1915.)

In the matter of the application of the Grade Crossing Commissioners of the City of Buffalo for the appointment of commissioners of appraisal to ascertain the compensation to be paid to the owners of and parties interested in lands claimed to be injured by the change of grade of Ferry street, etc., and claimed to be owned by Peter Hof et al. Proceeding No. 98.

PER CURIAM.

Motion granted, allowing claimant United States Cast Iron Pipe & Foundry Company and claimants Reeb and Neuhecker to add to the record on appeal certain resolutions of the common council of the city of Buffalo as to Ferry street, French street, and Box avenue, and certificates of recording of same by the city clerk' of Buffalo. See, also, 151 N. Y. Supp. 1119.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

BYRON YOUNG,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D21-3565

[May 26, 2022]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Barbara R. Duffy, 

Judge; L.T. Case No. 09-7400CF10A.

Byron Young, Wewahitchka, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

MAY, DAMOORGIAN, and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

BUREAU OF STANDARDS

S. W. STRATTON, Director

Miscellaneous Publications No. 49

April 18, 1922. GRAPHIC COMPARISON OF SCREW THREAD PITCHES

Showing the Number of Threads per Inch and Pitch in MilUmeters

for both Inch and Millimeter Systems

GRAPHICAL DETERMINATION OF THE

RELATION BETWEEN ENGLISH AND METRIC SCREW-THREAD PITCHES—By H. W. Scarce

3^

The "fineness" of an English screw thread is ordi- narily expressed in terms of the number of threads per

inch, while in the case of metric threads the same thing

is expressed in terms of the distance from one thread

to the next, measured parallel to the axis; that is, in terms of the pitch. In the accompanying chart a simple method has been

devised for finding the nearest equivalent of one sys- tem In terms of the other. Suppose it is desired to find the metric pitch most

nearly corresponding to 32 threads per inch. First, look along the horizontal line at the bottom of the chart

until 32 per inch is located; then go up vertically to the

point v/here this line cuts the curve, and then horizontally to the right to the vertical line showing the

pitch in millimeters. The pitch in millimeters is seen

to be 0.79 f. The pitch, in inches, corresponding to any number of threads per inch can also be obtained by going horizontally to the left from the curve, instead

of to the right. In this case it is seen to be 0.0312 inch.

Again, suppose it is desired to find the threads per

inch most nearly corresponding to a 2 mm pitch. Look

along the offset vertical line of metric pitches until 2 mm is located; then go horizontally across the chart

to the point where the horizontal line cuts the curve, and then vertically downward to the line showing threads

per inch. The point of intersection Will be the threads

per inch corresponding to a pitch of 2 mm. The equivalent is seen to be slightly less than 13 threads per inch

(12.7 more exactly). Again, if it is desired to find the pitch in inches cor- responding to a given pitch in millimeters, or vice versa,

it is only necessary to go horizontally across the chart from the one to the other. For example, 0.05 inch is seen to be equivalent to 1.27 mm ; and 3 mm equivalent to 0.118 inch. The accompanying table is provided to give extreme

values which can not conveniently be shown in the

chart; and also for the convenience of those who prefer

to use a table.

Designation

of

Screvr System

THREADS PER INCH

11—7944 GOVERNMENT PRIiniNO OTFICF
§ 781.65 Appeals. ( a ) Standing. The following parties have the right to appeal under this part: ( 1 ) Pursuant to 37 CFR 404.11: ( i ) A person whose application for a license has been denied;
( ii ) A licensee whose license has been modified or terminated, in whole or in part;
( iii ) A person who timely filed a written objection in response to the notice required by 37 CFR 404.7(a)(1)(i) or (b)(1)(i) and who can demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Federal agency that such person may be damaged by the agency action; or
( 2 ) A management and operating contractor appealing an agency decision to grant a copyright license to a third party pursuant to the Rights in Data-Technology Transfer clause for DOE management and operating contracts per 48 CFR part 970.
( b ) Notice of Appeal. Appeal under paragraph (a) of this section shall be initiated by filing a Notice of Appeal with the Secretary, ATTN: Deputy General Counsel for Technology Transfer and Procurement (“Deputy General Counsel”), within thirty (30) days from the date of receipt of a written notice by the Department of Energy of an action set forth in paragraph (a) of this section. The Notice of Appeal shall specify the portion of the decision from which the appeal is taken. A statement of fact and argument in the form of a brief in support of the appeal shall be submitted with the Notice of Appeal or within thirty (30) days thereafter.
( c ) Procedure. Appeals under this section shall be conducted pursuant to rules of procedure provided by the Deputy General Counsel.
( d ) Within sixty (60) days of receiving appellant's brief pursuant to paragraph (b) of this section or such other time period set by the Deputy General Counsel, the Office of the Assistant General Counsel for Technology Transfer and Intellectual Property shall submit to the Deputy General Counsel a response brief and shall timely serve a copy of the response brief to appellant.
( e ) The Deputy General Counsel shall consider the facts and arguments submitted in appellant's brief submitted under paragraph (b) of this section, as well as those presented by the Assistant General Counsel for Technology Transfer and Intellectual Property. An appeal by a licensee under paragraph (a)(1)(ii) of this section may include a hearing, upon request of the licensee, to address a dispute over any relevant fact. Such request for a hearing must be received by the Deputy General Counsel within thirty (30) days of appellant's receipt of the response brief.
( f ) The Deputy General Counsel shall issue a written decision, which shall constitute the final action of the Department on the matter.
( g ) The parties may agree to Alternate Dispute Resolution in lieu of an appeal.
( h ) Appeals Arising Under National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) Management and Operating Contracts. For appeals pursuant to paragraph (a)(2) of this section arising under management and operating contracts administered by NNSA for NNSA facilities, the NNSA Deputy General Counsel for Procurement shall be designated as the appeal authority (Deputy General Counsel) pursuant to paragraphs (b) through (f) of this section.
[77 FR 4890, Feb. 1, 2012]
Exhibit
31.1



CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT
TO RULE 13A-14(A) UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934



I,
Rory J. Cutaia, certify that:



|1. | I
    have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021 of Verb Technology Company, Inc.; and                                                                                                                                                                                        
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|2. | Based
    on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
    to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
    the period covered by this report.



|April
    12, 2022                                                                           | 
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|                                                                                             | 
|/s/
    Rory J. Cutaia                                                                       | 
|Rory
    J. Cutaia                                                                           | 
|President,
    Secretary, Chief Executive Officer, Director, and Principal Executive Officer |
1827.000 Scope of part.       This part prescribes NASA policies, procedures, and contract clauses pertaining to patents, data, and copyrights. The provisions of FAR Part 27 apply to NASA acquisitions unless specifically excepted in this part.    **Parent topic:** PART 1827—PATENTS, DATA, AND COPYRIGHTS
Editorial Note on Part 61
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 61 appear at 80 FR 74980, Dec. 1, 2015, and at 81 FR 86909, Dec. 2, 2016.

§ 61.59 Institutional requirements. ( a ) *Land ownership.* Disposal of radioactive waste received from other persons may be permitted only on land owned in fee by the Federal or a State government.
( b ) *Institutional control.* The land owner or custodial agency shall carry out an institutional control program to physically control access to the disposal site following transfer of control of the disposal site from the disposal site operator. The institutional control program must also include, but not be limited to, carrying out an environmental monitoring program at the disposal site, periodic surveillance, minor custodial care, and other requirements as determined by the Commission; and administration of funds to cover the costs for these activities. The period of institutional controls will be determined by the Commission, but institutional controls may not be relied upon for more than 100 years following transfer of control of the disposal site to the owner.