alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-1183

MICHAEL H. MCGEE, Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus
JANET RENO, US Attorney General, and her successors, in their official capacity as Attorney General of the United States; LOUISB. FREEH, and his successors, in their official capacity as the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation; CHARLES ROSSOTTI, and his successors, in their official capacity asUnited States Commissioner of Internal Revenue; LEONIDAS R. MECHAM, and his successors, in their official capacity as Director of the Administrative Office of the United States Courts; JAMES B. HUNT, JR., Governor, and his successors, in their official capacity as Governor of the State of North Carolina; MIKE EASLEY, Attorney General, and his successors, in their official capacity as North Carolina Attorney General; BRYAN E. BEATTY, and his successors, in their official capacity as Director of the North Carolina State Bureau of Investigation; J. THOMAS LUNSFORD, and his successors, in their official capacity as Executive Director of the North Carolina State Bar; THOMAS W. ROSS, and his successors, in their official capacity as executive Director of the North Carolina Medical Board; DARRELSTEPHENS, and his successors, in their official capacity as Chief, Charlotte-Mecklenburg Police Department; JIM PENDERGRAPH, and his successors, in their official capacity as Sheriff of Mecklenburg County, Defendants - Appellees,2 and
GEORGE B. TENET, and his successors, in their official capacity as Director of the United States Central Intelligence Agency; ANDREW W. WATRY, and his successors, in their official capacity as Executive Director of the North Carolina Medical Board, Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Chief District Judge. (CA-00-452-3-MU)
Submitted: June 29, 2001 Decided: July 13, 2001
Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael H. McGee, Appellant Pro Se. James Michael Sullivan, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina; Gilbert Steven Rothenberg, Annette Marie Wietecha, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C.; Staci Tolliver Meyer, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina; Aldert Root Edmonson, NORTH CAROLINA STATE BAR, Raleigh, North Carolina; Scott Douglas MacLatchie, WOMBLE, CARLYLE, SANDRIDGE & RICE, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).3 PER CURIAM:Michael H. McGee appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his civil action pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s orders and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See McGee v. Reno , No. CA-00-452-3-MU (W.D.N.C. Jan. 5 & Feb. 1, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.

AFFIRMED
2007-1656.

#### State ex rel. Babos v. Court of Appeals, Sixth Appellate Dist.

In Mandamus. On motion for judgment on the pleadings. Motion granted. Cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 31.2





CERTIFICATIONS





I, Michael J. Sallmann, Vice President  Finance and Secretary of Criticare Systems, Inc., certify that:





1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Criticare Systems, Inc.;





2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;




3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;




4.  The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:





(a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;





(b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and





(c)  disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and





5.  The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





(a)  all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and








(b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.





Date: May 11, 2004




/s/ Michael J. Sallmann


Michael J. Sallmann


Vice President - Finance and Secretary
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 398 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 398

Expressing support for the designation of June 21 as International Yoga 
                                  Day.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 21, 2017

Ms. Gabbard (for herself, Mr. Ryan of Ohio, Mr. Krishnamoorthi, and Ms. 
Jayapal) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Expressing support for the designation of June 21 as International Yoga 
                                  Day.

Whereas the United Nations adopted resolution 69/131 on December 11, 2014, which 
        proclaimed that June 21 is the International Day of Yoga;
Whereas 175 countries cosponsored the resolution;
Whereas the practicing of yoga will help promote better health among the global 
        population and help encourage the need for healthier choices and 
        lifestyles;
Whereas, on June 21, countries across the world will hold yoga events and 
        demonstrations; and
Whereas Prime Minister of India Narendra Modi addressed the United Nations 
        General Assembly on September 27, 2014, on the adoption of an 
        International Yoga Day, stating, ``Yoga is an invaluable gift of India's 
        ancient tradition. It embodies unity of mind and body; thought and 
        action; restraint and fulfillment; harmony between man and nature; a 
        holistic approach to health and well-being. It is not about exercise but 
        to discover the sense of oneness with yourself, the world and the 
        nature.'': Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) supports the designation of International Yoga Day;
            (2) supports the ideals that International Yoga Day 
        embodies; and
            (3) encourages all individuals to participate in 
        International Yoga Day events.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sionix Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), the undersigned, James J.
Houtz, President of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

                  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

                  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
                      in all material respects, the financial condition and
                      results of operations of the Company.

Date: May 7, 2003                                 /s/ James R. Houtz
                                                  --------------------------
                                                  James R. Houtz
                                                  President
Editorial Note on Part 9
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 9 appear at 82 FR 52825, Nov. 15, 2017.

§ 9.31 Extension of time for response. ( a ) In unusual circumstances defined in § 9.13, the NRC may extend the time limits prescribed in § 9.25 or § 9.29 by not more than 10 working days. The extension may be made by written notice to the person making the request to explain the reasons for the extension and indicate the date on which a determination is expected to be dispatched.
( b ) An extension of the time limits prescribed in §§ 9.25 and 9.29 may not exceed a combined total of 10 working days per request, unless a requester has agreed to an alternative time frame as described in § 9.25
( c ) .
#### § 71.2 Interpretations.

Except as specifically authorized by the Commission in writing, no interpretation of the meaning of the regulations in this part by any officer or employee of the Commission, other than a written interpretation by the General Counsel, will be recognized to be binding upon the Commission.
Exhibit 35.2



LOGO

Feb 28, 2015

Servicer
Compliance Statement

For SEMT 2013-2 (see Schedule A)

The
undersigned, a duly authorized officer of First Republic Bank (the Servicer), does hereby certify that:



| | (i) | a review of the Servicers activities during the reporting period from January 1, 2014 through December 31, 2014 and of its performance under the Agreement (as defined on Schedule A attached hereto) from
the above referenced trust during such period has been made under such officers supervision, and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | to the best of such officers knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under this Agreement in all material respects throughout such reporting period.
| | ---- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



First Republic BankBy:

/s/ Lionel AntunesName: Lionel Antunes Title: Vice President
of Residential Lending Date: Feb. 28, 2015




---

SCHEDULE A



|1. | Flow Mortgage Loan Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of July 1, 2010, between Redwood Residential Acquisition Corporation and First Republic Bank, as modified by the Reconstitution Agreement dated
January 30, 2013 (the Agreement).
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
U.S. Department of Transportation 

Office of the Secretary of Transportation 

DESIGNATION OF AGENT FOR 

SERVICE OF NOTICE, PROCESS, ORDERS 

DECISIONS AND REQUIREMENTS 

Chief, Documentary Services Div. 

Department of Transportation 

Washington. D C 20590 

ATTENTION: DOCKET SECTION. C-55 

C)?FR^!ONb 

1 .•, i i A ^02 

_i having its principal 

(Name of Company, please print) 

office at Bromnr> ;Sl:r&g.t )4tir>yi>^ ^SI Z lUlxxgJ )4er r^ondf-Z CL'trpor-f , fljuoJilL VK . 

(Address) 

hereby designates, pursuant to section 46103 of Title 49 of the U.S. Code (formerly section 1005(b) of 

the Federal Aviation Act of 1958. as amended) the person named belowr as its Agent upon service of all 

notice; and process and all orders\decisions, and requirements of the Department of Transportation 

may be made for and on behalf of said carrier, hereby canceling all previous designations of agents 

made by it to the DOT. 

Name of Agent: Luis A. Irizarrv. L A. Irizarrv & Assodates. Inc. 

(Please Print) 

Address: PC Box 37217. San Juan. Puerto Rico 00937-0217 

The Agent so designated has written his name and also his initials in the following space: 

Name: ^ / ^ ^^^^^^ 2 (Initials) (^ ^ 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, 'Se.skiia. P\>r <^.r\/\ciL^ , Jlnc has caused these 

(Name of Company) 

presents to be signed in its name by, ScvrvlD& ^Ao u Kjylt^JQMf ^ , President of 

(Please Print) 

said company, and to be attested under its corporate seal by Lofcnc u LoLSo-ilg.. , 

6>e£.reA(XY 

(Secretary or other Title) f on this ,-9/ day of -J* ^ * ^2011 . 

3^K 

ATTEST: 

(Secretary or other officer)
PGI 219.803 Selecting acquisitions for the

8(a) Program.

(1) Contracting activities should respond to SBA requests for contract support within 30 calendar

days after receipt.

(2) Before considering a small business set-aside, review the acquisition for offering under the 8(a)

Program.

Parent topic: PGI 219.8 -CONTRACTING WITH THE SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION (THE

8(A) PROGRAM)
#### Mary J. Maxwell, Guardian, *v.*The People *ex rel.*Freise, County Collector.

*Opinion filed February 20, 1901*

*Rehearing denied April 11, 1901.*

1. *Taxes—right of guardian to object to tax against ward’s property.*The removal of a guardian and ward from the State, while it may be ground for the discharge of the guardian by the county court does not affect the validity of an objection by her, as guardian, against the taxing of the ward’s property which has no taxable *situs*in this State. ,

2. The other questions involved are controlled by the decision in *Maxwell*v. *People, {ante,*p. 546.)

Boggs, C. J., and Hand, J., dissenting.

Appeal from the County Court of Mercer county; the Hon. W. T. Church, Judge, presiding.

*604Robert L. Watson, and Guy C. Scott, for appellant.

James M. Brock, for appellee.

Per Curiam:

The questions involved in this case are the same as those involved in, and decided by, the case of *Maxwell*v. *People, {ante,*p. 546). The objection, filed below by the appellant as guardian of her min'or son, was that she and her minor son were non-residents of Illinois on May 1, 1898, and April 1, 1899, and that, upon those dates, they had no personal property in the State of Illinois. The facts of non-residence and of the *situs*of the personal property outside of the State, as set up in the objection, were established by the proof. It makes no difference that the appellant was the guardian of her minor son. The right of the State to tax depends upon the question whether or not the owner of the property resided in this State, and whether or not the *situs*of his property was outside of this State. The removal of the guardian from the State may have been ground for the removal of such guardian by the county court under the provisions of the statute in regard to “Guardian and Ward.” But this in no way takes the present case out of the. principles announced in the case of *Maxwell*v. *People, supra. '*

Accordingly, the judgment of the county court, so far as it applies to the interest of said minor in the land in question, is reversed, and the cause is remanded to that court for further proceedings in accordance with the views herein expressed.

*Beversed and remanded.*

Boggs, C. J., and Hand, J., dissenting.
`[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 439 Reported in House (RH)]







                                                  House Calendar No. 85
109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 439

                          [Report No. 109-221]

  Providing for the consideration of the resolution (H. Res. 437) to 
     establish the Select Bipartisan Committee to Investigate the 
           Preparation for and Response to Hurricane Katrina.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 14, 2005

    Mr. Dreier, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION


 
  Providing for the consideration of the resolution (H. Res. 437) to 
     establish the Select Bipartisan Committee to Investigate the 
           Preparation for and Response to Hurricane Katrina.

    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order without intervention of any point of order to consider in the 
House the resolution (H. Res. 437) to establish the Select Bipartisan 
Committee to Investigate the Preparation for and Response to Hurricane 
Katrina. The resolution shall be considered as read. The previous 
question shall be considered as ordered on the resolution to final 
adoption without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate 
equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority 
member of the Committee on Rules; and (2) one motion to recommit which 
may not contain instructions.
                                                  House Calendar No. 85

109th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                              H. RES. 439

                          [Report No. 109-221]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

  Providing for the consideration of the resolution (H. Res. 437) to 
     establish the Select Bipartisan Committee to Investigate the 
           Preparation for and Response to Hurricane Katrina.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           September 14, 2005

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed`
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Domingo Perez, Appellant.

Judgment rendered on May 16, 1968 *{nunc pro tune*as of April 29, 1969) convicting defendant on his plea of guilty of manslaughter in the second degree, unanimously modified on the law .and on the facts by vacating the sentence and remanding for resentence and otherwise affirmed. While affirming the conviction as proper in all respects, we remand for resentence solely because the sentence imposed was to run concurrently with the assault term imposed under a judgment we have reversed simultaneously herewith. Concur — Stevens, P. J., Eager, Capozzoli, Nunez and Steuer, JJ.
# EUR-Lex - 31986D0153 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31986D0153

**86/153/EEC: Commission Decision of 25 March 1986 exempting Greece from applying to certain species Council Directives 66/401/EEC, 66/402/EEC and 69/208/EEC on the marketing of fodder plant seed, cereal seed and the seed of oil and fibre plants respectively (Only the Greek text is authentic) **

*
Official Journal L 115 , 03/05/1986 P. 0026 - 0027 *

*****

COMMISSION DECISION

of 25 March 1986

exempting Greece from applying to certain species Council Directives 66/401/EEC, 66/402/EEC and 69/208/EEC on the marketing of fodder plant seed, cereal seed and the seed of oil and fibre plants respectively

(Only the Greek text is authentic)

(86/153/EEC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community,

Having regard to Council Directive 66/401/EEC of 14 June 1966 on the marketing of fodder plant seed (1), as last amended by Regulation (EEC) No 3768/85 (2), and in particular Article 23a thereof,

Having regard to Council Directive 66/402/EEC of 14 June 1966 on the marketing of cereal seed (3), as last amended by Regulation (EEC) No 3768/85, and in particular Article 23a thereof,

Having regard to Council Directive 69/208/EEC of 30 June 1969 on the marketing of seed of oil and fibre plants (4), as last amended by Regulation (EEC) No 3768/75, and in particular Article 22 thereof,

Having regard to the request submitted by Greece,

Whereas seed of hairy vetch, swede, fodder kale, fodder radish, canary grass, spelt, brown mustard, cumin and white mustard is not normally reproduced or marketed in Greece;

Whereas, as long as those conditions obtain, Greece should be exempted from applying the provisions of the abovementioned Directives to the species in question;

Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on Seeds and Propagating Material for Agriculture, Horticulture and Forestry,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Greece is hereby exempted from applying:

1. Directive 66/401/EEC, with the exception of Article 14 (1), to the following species:

1.2 // (a) Vicia villosa Roth // - Hairy vetch // (b) Brassica napus L. var. napobrassica (L.) Peterm. // - Swede // (c) Brassica oleracea L. convar. acephala (DC.) // - Fodder kale // (d) Raphanus sativus L. ssp. oleifera (DC.) Metzg. // - Fodder radish

2. Directive 66/402/EEC, with the exception of Article 14 (1), to the following species:

1.2 // (a) Phalaris canariensis L. // - Canary grass // (b) Triticum spelta L. // - Spelt

3. Directive 69/208/EEC, with the exception of Article 13 (1), to the following species:

1.2 // (a) Brassica juncea (L.) Czern. et Coss in Czern. // - Brown mustard // (b) Carum carvi L. // - Cumin No L 169, 10. 7. 1969, p. 3.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Hellenic Republic.

Done at Brussels, 25 March 1986.

For the Commission

Frans ANDRIESSEN

Vice-President // (c) Sinapis alba L. // - White mustard

(1) OJ No 125, 11. 7. 1966, p. 2298/66. (2) OJ No L 362, 31. 12. 1985, p. 8. (3) OJ No 125, 11. 7. 1966, p. 2309/66. (4) OJ