alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT
31.2**
 
 CERTIFICATION
 
 I,
Jeffery A. Baird, certify that:
 
 1. I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of CAS Medical Systems,
Inc.;
 
 2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
 3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
 
 4. The
small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:
 
 a.
    Designed
      such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
      controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
      that material information relating to the small business issuer, including
      its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
      prepared; 
 b.
    Evaluated
      the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls and
      procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
      effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
      the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 
 c.
    Disclosed
      in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control
      over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s
      most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal
      quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or
      is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’s
      internal control over financial reporting; and  
 5. The
small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation, of internal control over financial reporting, to the
small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the small business
issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 
 a.
    All
      significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
      operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
      reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability
      to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 
 b.
    Any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer’s
      internal control over financial reporting.  
 
 
 /s/
Jeffery A. Baird
 
 Jeffery
A. Baird
 Chief
Financial Officer
 
 Date: May
1 2 ,
2005
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-4792

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

JAMES LEE WORKMAN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at 

Elkins. Thomas S. Kleeh, District Judge. (2:03-cr-00003-TSK-MJA-1)

Submitted: April 30, 2020 Decided: June 2, 2020

Before KEENAN, HARRIS, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kristen M. Leddy, Assistant Federal Public Defender, OFFICE OF THE FEDERAL 

PUBLIC DEFENDER, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellant. Stephen Donald 

Warner, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES 

ATTORNEY, Elkins, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

James Lee Workman appeals the district court’s order revoking his supervised 

release and imposing a 24-month revocation sentence with no additional supervision to 

follow. Workman’s appellate counsel filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 

U.S. 738 (1967), stating that there are no meritorious grounds for appeal. While this appeal 

was pending, Workman was released from federal custody. 

“When a case or controversy ceases to exist—either due to a change in the facts or 

the law—the litigation is moot, and the court’s subject matter jurisdiction ceases to exist 

also.” Porter v. Clarke, 852 F.3d 358, 363 (4th Cir. 2017) (internal quotation marks 

omitted). “Because mootness is jurisdictional, we can and must consider it even if neither 

party has raised it.” United States v. Ketter, 908 F.3d 61, 65 (4th Cir. 2018). Workman

has already served his sentence, faces no further term of supervised release, and suggests 

no other collateral consequences sufficient to meet the case or controversy requirement; 

thus, there is no longer a live controversy. Workman’s challenge to the revocation of his 

supervised release and revocation sentence is therefore moot. See United States v. Hardy, 

545 F.3d 280, 284 (4th Cir. 2008).

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Editorial Note on Part 851
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 851 appear at 88 FR 41293, June 26, 2023.

§ 851.44 Administrative appeal. ( a ) Any contractor that receives a final notice of violation may petition the Office of Hearings and Appeals for review of the final notice in accordance with 10 CFR part 1003, within 30 calendar days from receipt of the final notice.
( b ) In order to exhaust administrative remedies with respect to a final notice of violation, the contractor must petition the Office of Hearings and Appeals for review in accordance with paragraph (a) of this section.
[71 FR 6931, Feb. 9, 2006, as amended at 88 FR 41294, June 26, 2023]
Exhibit 35.1

SERVICING COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2013-1 for the fiscal year ending
December 31, 2014 (the Report), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Santander Consumer USA Inc. (the Servicer), does hereby certify and represent that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities and performance of the Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of January 16, 2013, among Santander Drive Auto Receivables LLC, Santander Consumer USA Inc., Santander
Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2013-1 and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas (the Agreement) during the period that is the subject of the Report has been made under my supervision.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the period that is the subject of the Report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



SANTANDER CONSUMER USA INC./s/ Jason KulasName:

Jason KulasTitle:

President and Chief Financial OfficerDate:

March 23, 2015/s/ Jennifer M. PoppName:

Jennifer M. PoppTitle:

Chief Accounting OfficerDate:

March 23, 2015
# EUR-Lex - 31987R1096 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31987R1096

**Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1096/87 of 21 April 1987 amending Regulation (EEC) No 3143/85 on the sale at reduced prices of intervention butter intended for direct consumption in the form of concentrated butter **

*
Official Journal L 106 , 22/04/1987 P. 0020 - 0020 Finnish special edition: Chapter 3 Volume 23 P. 0118 Swedish special edition: Chapter 3 Volume 23 P. 0118 *

*****

COMMISSION REGULATION (EEC) No 1096/87

of 21 April 1987

amending Regulation (EEC) No 3143/85 on the sale at reduced prices of intervention butter intended for direct consumption in the form of concentrated butter

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 804/68 of 27 June 1968 on the common organization of the market in milk and milk products (1), as last amended by Regulation (EEC) No 773/87 (2), and in particular Article 6 (7) thereof,

Whereas Commission Regulation (EEC) No 3143/85 (3), as last amended by Regulation (EEC) No 569/87 (4), provides for the sale at reduced prices of intervention butter intended for direct consumption in the form of concentrated butter; whereas this is one of the additional measures provided for in 1987 and 1988 to increase the rate of disposal of butter from public storage; whereas special rules for the financing of these measures were introduced into Article 4 (1) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1883/78 (5), as last amended by Regulation (EEC) No 801/87 (6), with effect from 1 December 1986; whereas the said special rules for financing should, therefore, be referred to in Regulation (EEC) No 3143/85;

Whereas the measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Milk and Milk Products,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The following subparagraph is hereby added to Article 13 of Regulation (EEC) No 3143/85:

'The expenditure arising from this Regulation shall be financed in accordance with the provisions of the second, third and fourth subparagraphs of Article 4 (1) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1883/78 (1).

(1) OJ No L 216, 5. 8. 1978, p. 1.'

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

It shall apply with effect from 1 December 1986.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 21 April 1987.

For the Commission

Frans ANDRIESSEN

Vice-President

(1) OJ No L 148, 28. 6. 1968, p. 13.

(2) OJ No L 78, 20. 3. 1987, p. 1.

(3) OJ No L 298, 12. 11. 1985, p. 9.

(4) OJ No L 57, 27. 2. 1987, p. 26.

(5) OJ No L 216, 5. 8. 1978, p. 1.

(6) OJ No L 79, 21. 3. 1987, p. 14.
#### Sam Seidman, Appellant, v. Fred C. Bachtel, Appellee.

Gen. No. 41,034.

opinion filed June 24, 1940.

Herman L. Aaron, for appellant; E. C. Weichbrodt, for appellee.

Opinion by

Presiding Justice Matchett.

“Not to be published in full.’’
|   | 1. | I am a duly authorized officer of BMW Financial Services NA, LLC; |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | I have reviewed the terms of that certain Servicing Agreement, dated as of August 30, 1995 (the “Basic Servicing Agreement”), between Financial Services Vehicle Trust (the “Trust”) and BMW Financial Services NA, LLC, as servicer (in such capacity, the “Servicer”), as supplemented by the 2013-1 SUBI Servicing Supplement, dated as of January 1, 2014 (together with the Basic Servicing Agreement, the “Servicing Agreement”), among the Trust, BMW Manufacturing L.P., as grantor and initial beneficiary of the Trust, and BMW Financial Services NA, LLC, as sponsor and as Servicer, and I have made, or have caused to be made under my supervision, a detailed review of the activities of the Servicer and the performance of its obligations thereunder during the period from January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2014; |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 3. | To the best of my knowledge, based on the review described in paragraph 2, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement in all material respects during the period from January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2014, except as set forth below. |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
§ 73.6 Exemptions for certain quantities and kinds of special nuclear material. A licensee is exempt from the requirements of 10 CFR part 26 and §§ 73.20, 73.25, 73.26, 73.27, 73.45, 73.46, 73.70 and 73.72 with respect to the following special nuclear material: ( a ) Uranium-235 contained in uranium enriched to less than 20 percent in the U-235 isotope.
( b ) Special nuclear material which is not readily separable from other radioactive material and which has a total external radiation level in excess of 1 gray (100 rad) per hour at a distance of 1 meter (3.3 feet) from any accessible surface without intervening shielding.
( c ) Special nuclear material in a quantity not exceeding 350 grams of uranium-235, uranium-233, plutonium, or a combination thereof, possessed in any analytical, research, quality control, metallurgical or electronic laboratory.
( d ) Special nuclear material that is being transported by the United States Department of Energy transport system.
( e ) Special nuclear material at non-power reactors.
Licensees subject to § 73.60 are not exempted from §§ 73.70 and 73.72, and licensees subject to § 73.67(e) are not exempted from § 73.72 of this part. [40 FR 52841, Nov. 13, 1975, as amended at 44 FR 68187, Nov. 28, 1979; 58 FR 31471, June 3, 1993; 78 FR 34250, June 7, 2013; 86 FR 43402, Aug. 9, 2021]
Editorial Note on Part 63
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 63 appear at 81 FR 86909, Dec. 2, 2016.

§ 63.45 Amendment of license. ( a ) An application for amendment of a license may be filed with the Commission fully describing the changes desired and following as far as applicable the format prescribed for license applications.
( b ) In determining whether an amendment of a license will be approved, the Commission will be guided by the considerations that govern the issuance of the initial license, to the extent applicable.
exv4w20






Exhibit 4.20




Exhibit A

to

Term Loan Agreement




Form of Term Loan Note



			
	 	 	 
	Lender: [Name of Lender]
	 	New York, New York
	Principal Amount: [$                     ]
	 	December 20, 2006





          For value received, the undersigned, Revlon Consumer Products Corporation, a
Delaware corporation (the “Company”), hereby promises to pay to the order of the Lender set forth
above (the “Lender”) the Principal Amount set forth above, or, if less, the aggregate unpaid
principal amount of the Term Loan (as defined in the Term Loan Agreement referred to below) of the
Lender to the Company, payable at such times, and in such amounts, as are specified in the Term
Loan Agreement.


          The Company promises to pay interest on the unpaid principal amount of such Term Loan from the
date made until such principal amount is paid in full, at such interest rates, and payable at such
times, as are specified in the Term Loan Agreement.


          Both principal and interest are payable in Dollars to Citicorp USA, Inc. (“Citicorp”), as
administrative agent for the Lenders (in such capacity, the “Administrative Agent”), at 388
Greenwich Street, New York New York 10013, in immediately available funds.


          This Note is one of the Term Loan Notes referred to in, and is entitled to the benefits of,
the Term Loan Agreement, dated as of December 20, 2006 (as the same may be amended, restated,
supplemented or otherwise modified from time to time, the “Term Loan Agreement”), among the
Company, the Lenders party thereto, the Administrative Agent, Citicorp, as collateral agent for the
Secured Parties, and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as syndication agent. Capitalized terms used
herein and not defined herein are used herein as defined in the Term Loan Agreement.


          The Term Loan Agreement, among other things, (a) provides for the making of a Term Loan by the
Lender to the Company in an aggregate amount not to exceed at any time outstanding the Principal
Amount set forth above, the indebtedness of the Company resulting from such Term Loan being
evidenced by this Note and (b) contains provisions for acceleration of the maturity of the unpaid
principal amount of this Note upon the happening of certain stated events and also for prepayments
on account of the principal hereof prior to the maturity hereof upon the terms and conditions
therein specified.


          This Note is entitled to the benefits of the Guaranty and is secured as provided in the
Security Documents.


          Demand, diligence, presentment, protest and notice of non-payment and protest are hereby
waived by the Company.


          This Note shall be governed by, and construed and interpreted in accordance with, the law of
the State of New York.





A-1









 







          In witness whereof, the Company has caused this Note to be executed and delivered by
its duly authorized officer as of the day and year and at the place set forth above.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	Revlon Consumer Products Corporation

 	 
	 	By:  	 	 
	 	 	Name:  	 	 
	 	 	Title:  	 	 
	 



[Signature Page from Term Loan Note of Revlon Consumer Products Corporation]
Editorial Note on Part 40
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 40 appear at 79 FR 75740, Dec. 19, 2014.

§ 40.38 Ineligibility of certain applicants. A license may not be issued to the Corporation if the Commission determines that: ( a ) The Corporation is owned, controlled, or dominated by an alien, a foreign corporation, or a foreign government; or
( b ) The issuance of such a license would be inimical to— ( 1 ) The common defense and security of the United States; or
( 2 ) The maintenance of a reliable and economical domestic source of enrichment services.
[62 FR 6669, Feb. 12, 1997]
# EUR-Lex - 31989D0483 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31989D0483

**89/483/EEC: Commission Decision of 26 July 1989 amending Decision 86/414/EEC as regards the list of establishments in Argentina approved for the purpose of importing meat products into the Community **

*
Official Journal L 235 , 12/08/1989 P. 0035 - 0036 *

*****

COMMISSION DECISION

of 26 July 1989

amending Decision 86/414/EEC as regards the list of establishments in Argentina approved for the purpose of importing meat products into the Community

(89/483/EEC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community,

Having regard to Council Directive 72/462/EEC of 12 December 1972 on health and veterinary inspection problems upon importation of bovine animals and swine and fresh meat or meat products from third countries (1), as last amended by Directive 89/227/EEC (2), and in particular Article 4 (1) thereof,

Whereas a list of establishments in Argentina, approved for the purpose of importing meat products into the Community, was drawn up initially by Commission Decision 86/414/EEC (3), as last amended by Decision 89/151/EEC (4);

Whereas a Community on-the-spot visit to meat product establishments in Argentina has revealed that the level of hygiene in one establishment was altered since the last inspection; whereas the list of establishments should be amended accordingly;

Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Veterinary Committee,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The Annex to Decision 86/414/EEC is hereby replaced by the Annex to this Decision.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 26 July 1989.

For the Commission

Ray MAC SHARRY

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ No L 302, 31. 12. 1972, p. 28.

(2) OJ No L 93, 6. 4. 1989, p. 25.

(3) OJ No L 237, 23. 8. 1986, p. 36.

(4) OJ No L 59, 2. 3. 1989, p. 27.

ANNEX

LIST OF ESTABLISHMENTS

1.2.3 // // // // Approval No // Establishment // Address // // // // 13 // Swift Armour SA Argentina // Rosario, Santa Fe // 16 // Santa Elena // Santa Elena, Entre Ríos // 89 // Carcarana // Carcarana, Santa Fe // 249 // Frigorífico Nelson // Nelson, Santa Fe // 1311 // Frymat Saicfa // Santa Fe, Santa Fe // 1352 // Frigorífico Meatex SA // Alejandro Korn, Buenos Aires // 1373 // El Centenario // Venado Tuerto, Santa Fe // 1383 // Barreca Hnos // Vivorata, Buenos Aires // 1399 // FRIA // Casilda, Santa Fe // 1822 // Meatex // Villa Ballester, Buenos Aires // 1921 // San Telmo Saciafif // Mar del Plata, Buenos Aires // 1930 // Vizental y Cía Sacia // San José, Entre Ríos // 1964 // Casasa SA // Dolores, Buenos Aires // 2052 // Matadero y Frigorífico Antartico SAIC // González Catan, Buenos Aires // 2067 // Cía elaboradora de productos animales Saicagt // Pontevedra, Buenos Aires // // //
§ 207.4 Confidentiality of energy information. ( a ) Information obtained by the DOE under authority of ESECA shall be available to the public in accordance with the provisions of part 202 of this chapter. Upon a showing satisfactory to the Administrator by any person that any energy information obtained under this subpart from such person would, if made public, divulge methods or processes entitled to protection as trade secrets or other proprietary information of such person, such information, or portion thereof, shall be deemed confidential in accordance with the provisions of section 1905 of title 18, United States Code; except that such information, or part thereof, shall not be deemed confidential pursuant to that section for purposes of disclosure, upon request, to ( 1 ) any delegate of the DOE for the purpose of carrying out ESECA or the EPAA,
( 2 ) the Attorney General, the Secretary of the Interior, the Federal Trade Commission, the Federal Power Commission, or the General Accounting Office, when necessary to carry out those agencies' duties and responsibilities under ESECA and other statutes, and
( 3 ) the Congress, or any Committee of Congress upon request of the Chairman.
( b ) Whenever the Administrator requests reports of energy information under this subpart, he may specify (in the rule, order or questionnaire or other means by which he has requested such reports) the nature of the showing required to be made in order to satisfy DOE that certain energy information contained in such reports warrants confidential treatment in accordance with this section. He shall, to the maximum extent practicable, either before or after requesting reports, by ruling or otherwise, inform respondents providing energy information pursuant to this subpart of whether such information will be made available to the public pursuant to requests under the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552).