alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**AIMD-99-251R**                      Published: Aug 26, 1999. Publicly Released: Aug 26, 1999.                  

-   
-   
-   
-   

    Jump To:  
-  Elder Abuse 
-  Services for Older Adults 
-  State and Local-Level Drivers and Trends 
-  State and Local Fiscal Projections 
-  Federal Borrowing 
-  Managing the Debt 
-  Summary of Funding Provisions 
-  Auditing the Government's Books 
-  Unpacking the Financial Report 
-  Highlights 
-  Recommendations 
-  Background 
-  About This Work 
-  About This Work 
-  Trends 
-  About the Center 
-  Why It's High Risk 
-  What Remains To Be Done 
-  Key Reports 
-  Newest COVID-Related Reports 
-  AI Use Cases 
-  Flood Insurance 
-  Past Pandemic-Related Reports 
-  CARES Act Oversight Reports 
-  All COVID-19 Reports 
-  Report Suspected Fraud 
-  Subjects 
-  How to Get Notified 
-  Past Reports 
-  Public Health Threats 
-  Explore the FY 2022 and 2023 Funds 
-  Status of FY22 Projects 
-  Lessons Learned 
-  Agency Reports 
-  Recent Reports 
-  Recommendations 
-  Supplemental Material 
-  Full Report 
-  Additional Data 
-  View Decision 
-  Downloads 
-  Previously Identified Actions 
-  Related Pages 
-  Associated Agencies 
-  Tough Choices and Opportunities Ahead 
-  Americas Fiscal Future Key Areas 
-  Retirement Security Key Areas 
-  Current List 
-  About The High Risk List 
-  Area Ratings 
-  Previous High Risk Products 
-  Search Federal Vacancies 
-  Past Federal Vacancies 
-  Violation Letters 
-  About the Yellow Book 
-  Advisory Council 
-  Related Resources 
-  Comment Letters 
-  Related Publications 
-  Contacts and Resources 
-  Major Issues Facing the Nation 
-  Meeting Strategic Challenges 
-  Additional Resources 
-  Resources 
-  GAO Contacts 
-  Mission Teams 
-  Operations and Staff Offices  
-  Organization Chart  
-  Why a Career at GAO? 
-  Am I Qualified? 
-  Company Culture 
-  Reasonable Accommodations 
-  Video Gallery 
-  Paid Internships 
-  Student Volunteers 
-  Professional Development Program 
-  Advancement 
-  Executive Candidate Program 
-  Summer Associates 
-  Externships 
-  Benefits 
-  Contacts 

Skip to Highlights

## Highlights

Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO provided information on the expenditures for the Office of Independent Counsel Kenneth W. Starr, focusing on the office's responses to 46 questions grouped into 11 categories.

## Full Report

Full Report (16 pages)

## Office of Public Affairs

### Media Inquiries

Sarah Kaczmarek
kaczmareks@gao.gov

(202) 512-4800

### Public Inquiries

Public Affairs
PublicAffairs@gao.gov

(202) 512-4800

## Topics

Justice and Law Enforcement

Budget outlaysCompensationFederal employeesFinancial managementStaff utilizationIndependent counselsInvestigations into federal agenciesLegal feesSalary increasesTravel costs
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

KY/Research

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOSE ANTONIO DEL CIDMAZARIEGOS,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 07-74470

Agency No. A098-113-305

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted January 11, 2010** 

Before: BEEZER, TROTT, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges. 

Jose Antonio Del Cid-Mazariegos, a native and citizen of Guatemala,

petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals order dismissing

his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for

FILED

JAN 21 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
KY/Research 2 07-74470

asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture

(“CAT”). Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo

questions of law, Cerezo v. Mukasey, 512 F.3d 1163, 1166 (9th Cir. 2008), except

to the extent that deference is owed to the BIA’s determination of the governing

statutes and regulations, Simeonov v. Ashcroft, 371 F.3d 532, 535 (9th Cir. 2004). 

We review factual findings for substantial evidence. Zehatye v. Gonzales, 453

F.3d 1182, 1184-85 (9th Cir. 2006). We deny in part and dismiss in part the

petition for review.

We reject Del Cid-Mazariegos’ claim that he is eligible for asylum and

withholding of removal based on his membership in a particular social group,

namely, Guatemalan males who refuse to join gangs, or based on his anti-gang

political opinion. See Santos-Lemus v. Mukasey, 542 F.3d 738, 745-46 (9th Cir.

2008) (rejecting as a particular social group “young men in El Salvador resisting

gang violence”) (internal quotation omitted); Barrios v. Holder, 581 F.3d 849,

854-56 (9th Cir. 2009) (refusal to join a gang does not amount to political opinion.) 

Accordingly, because Del Cid-Mazariegos failed to demonstrate that he was

persecuted on account of a protected ground, we deny the petition as to his asylum

and withholding of removal claims. See id. at 856.
KY/Research 3 07-74470

We lack jurisdiction to consider Del Cid-Mazariegos’ CAT claim because he

did not exhaust it before the agency. See Barron v. Ashcroft, 358 F.3d 674, 677-78

(9th Cir. 2004).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.
§ 850.37 Training and counseling. ( a ) The responsible employer must develop and implement a beryllium training program and ensure participation for: ( 1 ) Beryllium-associated workers;
( 2 ) All other individuals who work at a site where beryllium activities are conducted.
( b ) The training provided for workers identified in paragraph (a)(1) of this section, must: ( 1 ) Be in accordance with 29 CFR 1910.1200, Hazard Communication;
( 2 ) Include the contents of the CBDPP; and
( 3 ) Include potential health risks to beryllium worker family members and others who may come in contact with beryllium on beryllium workers or beryllium workers' personal clothing or other personal items as the result of a beryllium control failure at a DOE facility.
( c ) The training provided for workers identified in paragraph (a)(2) of this section must consist of general awareness about beryllium hazards and controls.
( d ) The responsible employer must provide the training required by this section before or at the time of initial assignment and at least every two years thereafter.
( e ) The employer must provide retraining when the employer has reason to believe that a beryllium worker lacks the proficiency, knowledge, or understanding needed to work safely with beryllium, including at least the following situations: ( 1 ) To address any new beryllium hazards resulting from a change to operations, procedures, or beryllium controls about which the beryllium worker was not previously trained; and
( 2 ) If a beryllium worker's performance involving beryllium work indicates that the worker has not retained the requisite proficiency.
( f ) The responsible employer must develop and implement a counseling program to assist beryllium-associated workers who are diagnosed by the SOMD to be sensitized to beryllium or to have CBD. This counseling program must include communicating with beryllium-associated workers concerning: ( 1 ) The medical surveillance program provisions and procedures;
( 2 ) Medical treatment options;
( 3 ) Medical, psychological, and career counseling;
( 4 ) Medical benefits;
( 5 ) Administrative procedures and workers rights under applicable Workers' Compensation laws and regulations;
( 6 ) Work practice procedures limiting beryllium-associated worker exposure to beryllium; and
( 7 ) The risk of continued beryllium exposure after sensitization.
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications.

 

 

I, Anthony Sfarra, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports onForm 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report onForm 10-K of the WFRBS Commercial Mortgage Trust 2013-C12 (the "ExchangeAct periodic reports");

 

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, takenas a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing andother information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the periodcovered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statementsrequired in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except asdisclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilledtheir obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and

 

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicingcriteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports onassessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securitiesrequired to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 ofRegulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as anexhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Anymaterial instances of noncompliance described in such reports have beendisclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied oninformation provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:

 

National Cooperative Bank, N.A. (successor to NCB, FSB), as NCBMaster Servicer, Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as Special Servicer, NationalCooperative Bank, N.A. (successor to NCB, FSB), as Co-op Special Servicer, U.S.Bank National Association, as Trustee prior to October 17, 2022, U.S. BankTrust Company, National Association, as Trustee on and after October 17, 2022,Pentalpha Surveillance LLC, as Trust Advisor, CoreLogic Solutions, LLC, asServicing Function Participant, PGIM Real Estate Loan Services, Inc.(formerly known as Prudential Asset Resources, Inc.), as Primary Servicer,Computershare Trust Company, National Association, as Servicing FunctionParticipant for the Certificate Administrator, and Computershare Trust Company,National Association, as Servicing Function Participant for theCustodian. 

 

 

Dated: March 13, 2023 

 

/s/ Anthony Sfarra

Anthony Sfarra

President

(seniorofficer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
# Materials Not Included in

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

Docket Number: FAA

- 2015

- 1984

Directorate Identifier: 2015NM022AD

747

- 53A2494

--- 9/18/03

747

- 53A2450, R7

--- 11/2/11

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the

Supplemental AD Docket



### MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03/05/2008
| (logo) WELLS            FARGO | Corporate Trust Services

 

MAC R1204-010 9062 Old Annapolis Road

Columbia, MD 21045

 

Tel:  410 884 2000

Fax: 410 715 2380 |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

 

 

 

J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp.

383 Madison Avenue

31st Floor

New York, New York 10179

 

 

 

 

RE: Annual Statement of Compliance for JP Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Trust 2013-C10, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2013-C10

 

 

Per the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of March 1, 2013 ( the "Agreement"), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Certificate Administrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2014 (the "Reporting Period" ) :

 

(a) A review of Wells Fargo's activities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under such officer's supervision; and

 

(b) To the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

 

 

February 25, 2015

 

/s/  Brian Smith 

BRIAN SMITH 

Vice President

 

 

 

 

 

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Editorial Note on Part 851
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 851 appear at 88 FR 41293, June 26, 2023.

§ 851.4 Compliance order. ( a ) The Secretary may issue to any contractor a Compliance Order that: ( 1 ) Identifies a situation that violates, potentially violates, or otherwise is inconsistent with a requirement of this part;
( 2 ) Mandates a remedy, work stoppage, or other action; and,
( 3 ) States the reasons for the remedy, work stoppage, or other action.
( b ) A Compliance Order is a final order that is effective immediately unless the Order specifies a different effective date.
( c ) Within 15 calendar days of the issuance of a Compliance Order, the recipient of the Order may request the Secretary to rescind or modify the Order. A request does not stay the effectiveness of a Compliance Order unless the Secretary issues an order to that effect.
( d ) A copy of the Compliance Order must be prominently posted, once issued, at or near the location where the violation, potential violation, or inconsistency occurred until it is corrected.
<TABLE> <S> <C>
 
<ARTICLE>                                                           5 

        
<S>                                                   <C> 
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                   3-MOS 
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                         SEP-30-1997 
<PERIOD-START>                                            OCT-01-1996 
<PERIOD-END>                                              DEC-31-1996 
<CASH>                                                         25,626 
<SECURITIES>                                                        0 
<RECEIVABLES>                                                       0 
<ALLOWANCES>                                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                                    61,885 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                               90,492 
<PP&E>                                                      1,545,794 
<DEPRECIATION>                                               (187,557) 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                              1,455,725
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                         231,303 
<BONDS>                                                             0 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                               0 
<PREFERRED>                                                         0 
<COMMON>                                                       23,725
<OTHER-SE>                                                    988,795 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                1,455,725 
<SALES>                                                             0 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                    0 
<CGS>                                                               0 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                              245,735     
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                    0 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                              3,125
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                              (248,860) 
<INCOME-TAX>                                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                          (248,860) 
<DISCONTINUED>                                                      0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                     0 
<CHANGES>                                                           0 
<NET-INCOME>                                                 (248,860)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                   (0.01) 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                   (0.01) 

         

</TABLE>
H. Res. 1001 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

July 18, 2018. 

Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall 

be in order to consider in the House the concurrent resolution 

(H. Con. Res. 119) expressing the sense of Congress that a 

carbon tax would be detrimental to the United States economy. All points of order against consideration of the concurrent resolution are waived. The concurrent resolution shall be 

considered as read. All points of order against provisions in 

the concurrent resolution are waived. The previous question 

shall be considered as ordered on the concurrent resolution 

and preamble to adoption without intervening motion or demand for division of the question except one hour of debate 

equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on Ways and Means. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
§ 140.82 Procedures. ( a ) The Commission may initiate, on its own motion, the making of a determination as to whether or not there has been an extraordinary nuclear occurrence. In the event the Commission does not so initiate the making of a determination, any affected person, or any licensee or person with whom an indemnity agreement is executed or a person providing financial protection may petition the Commission for a determination of whether or not there has been an extraordinary nuclear occurrence. If the Commission does not have, or does not expect to have, within 7 days after it has received notification of an alleged event, enough information available to make a determination that there has been an extraordinary nuclear occurrence, the Commission will publish a notice in the Federal Register setting forth the date and place of the alleged event and requesting any persons having knowledge thereof to submit their information to the Commission.
( b ) When a procedure is initiated under paragraph (a) of this section, the Commission will designate members of the principal staff to begin immediately to assemble the relevant information and prepare a report on which the Commission can make its determination.
[33 FR 15999, Oct. 31, 1968, as amended at 40 FR 8794, Mar. 3, 1975]
§ 800.103 Review by Application Approving Official. ( a ) The Application Approving Official shall consider the results of the Panel's review under section 102 (c) or (d), and such other information as the Application Approving Official determines to be relevant pursuant to the provisions of this regulation, and shall either approve or disapprove the application, giving it priority in accordance with the provisions of § 800.102(b).
( b ) The Application Approving Official shall authorize a contracting officer to notify the applicant of approval or disapproval.
( c ) An applicant whose application has been rejected will be informed, on request, of the reason for rejection. Rejection is not a bar to submission of an appropriately revised application.
§ 850.32 Waste disposal. ( a ) The responsible employer must control the generation of beryllium-containing waste, and beryllium-contaminated equipment and other items that are disposed of as waste, through the application of waste minimization principles.
( b ) Beryllium-containing waste, and beryllium-contaminated equipment and other items that are disposed of as waste, must be disposed of in sealed, impermeable bags, containers, or enclosures to prevent the release of beryllium dust during handling and transportation. The bags, containers, and enclosures that are used for disposal of beryllium waste must be labeled according to § 850.38.
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Patient Safety
Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended September 30, 2010, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), Brian E. Stewart, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and
David C. Dreyer, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





/s/ Brian E. StewartName:
      Brian E. StewartTitle:
      Chief Executive OfficerDate:
      November 19, 2010/s/ David C. DreyerName:
      David C. DreyerTitle:
      Chief Financial OfficerDate:
      November 19, 2010





The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and
is not being “filed” as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure
document for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended (the “Exchange Act”), or otherwise subject to liability under that
section. This certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference
into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange
Act except to the extent that this Exhibit 32.1 is expressly and specifically
incorporated by reference in any such filing.





A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

September 9, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

136494 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, 

Justices 

v SC: 136494 

 COA: 284026 

Genesee CC: 07-021273-FH 

TYBERRIUS MARTECE ROBERTS, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 16, 2008 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

p0828 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 9, 2008 

 Clerk