alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
2008-0031.

#### State ex rel. Norfolk S. Ry. Co. v. Hanna.

In Mandamus and Prohibition. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus and prohibition. Upon consideration of relator’s application for dismissal,

It is ordered by the court that the application for dismissal is granted. Accordingly, this cause is dismissed.
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Robert Genovas, Appellant, v. James J. Morrow, as Director of Woodbourne Rehabilitation Center, Respondent.

'Motion to dismiss appeal granted, without costs, on the ground that relator has been released to aftercare supervision (see *People ex rel. Wilder*v. Markley, 26 N Y 2d 648). Cross motion denied, without costs. Herlihy, P. J., Reynolds, Greenblott, Cooke and Sweeney, JJ., concur.
NotesFAQContact Us

Collection

Thesaurus
AdvancedSearch Tips

Collection

Thesaurus
BrowseThesaurus

 Download full text

**ERIC Number:**

**Record Type:**

**Publication Date:**

**Pages:**

**Abstractor:**

**ISBN:**

**ISSN:**

**EISSN:**

Elementary Secondary EducationParent ParticipationResource MaterialsScience EducationScience ExperimentsScience FairsScience Process SkillsScience ProjectsScientific Concepts

**Publication Type:**

**Education Level:**

**Audience:**

**Language:**

**Sponsor:**

**Authoring Institution:**

**Grant or Contract Numbers:**

PrivacyCopyrightContact UsSelection PolicyAPI
JournalsNon-JournalsDownloadSubmitMultimediaWidget
Exhibit 35.9








Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation
60 WALL ST
NEW YORK, New York 10005-2836







RE: Annual Statement of Compliance for COMM 2013-LC6 Commercial
Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2013-LC6



Per the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of January 1, 2013
(the “Agreement”), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Certificate Administrator
(“Wells Fargo”), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2015 (the “Reporting
Period”):



(a) A review
of Wells Fargo's activities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under such officer's
supervision; and



(b) To the best
of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all
material respects throughout the Reporting Period.







March 1, 2016





BRIAN
SMITH

Vice President
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
ART. 5 FDS FOR QUARTER 10-Q
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           1,326
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   32,568
<ALLOWANCES>                                       235
<INVENTORY>                                      3,872
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                62,622
<PP&E>                                         415,403
<DEPRECIATION>                                 106,430
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 497,555
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          102,532
<BONDS>                                        224,048
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           588
<OTHER-SE>                                     123,438
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   497,555
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               161,148
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  122,295
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,586
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (17,089)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        79
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (17,168)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (17,168)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.29)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.29)
        

</TABLE>
#### General Instrument Corporation, Inc., Respondent, v Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., Appellant.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on September 6, 1979, unanimously affirmed for the reasons stated by A. Klein, J., at Special Term. Respondent shall recover of appellant $75 costs and disbursements of this appeal. Concur — Sandler, J. P., Sullivan, Markewich, Lupiano and Silverman, JJ.
#### Sandra A. Srebnick, Respondent, v. Barry Srebnick, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated February 18, 1969, as, on reargument, (1) adhered to the original decision adjudging him in contempt of court and (2) provided for the making of a new order of commitment. Order dated *973February 18, 1969, affirmed insofar as appealed from. No opinion. Appeal from order of the same court dated November 25, 1968 dismissed as academic. That order was superseded by the order made on reargument, dated February 18, 1969. A single bill of costs is allowed to respondent to cover both appeals. Rabin, Acting P. J., Benjamin, Munder, Martuscello and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.
#### § 76.53 Consultation with Environmental Protection Agency.

In reviewing an application for a certificate, including the provisions of any compliance plan, the Director shall consult with the Environmental Protection Agency and solicit the Environmental Protection Agency's written comments on the application.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                  5

<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                            443969
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      22783
<ALLOWANCES>                                        3590
<INVENTORY>                                            0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  463162
<PP&E>                                             52732
<DEPRECIATION>                                      5942
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1315798
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              80656
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                              80
<OTHER-SE>                                       1144563
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1315798
<SALES>                                                0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   70925
<CGS>                                                  0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     210216
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (139291)
<INCOME-TAX>                                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (139291)
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (139291)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (0.02)



</TABLE>
PART 38 – FEDERAL SUPPLY SCHEDULE CONTRACTING       SUBPART 38.90 DLA–MANAGED FEDERAL SUPPLY SCHEDULES                                                         38.9000 Scope.                                                            38.9001 General.                                                            38.9002 DLA–Managed Federal Supply Schedules for FedMall.    SUBPART 38.90 DLA–MANAGED FEDERAL SUPPLY SCHEDULES    *(Revised December 8, 2020 through PROCLTR 2021-02)* 38.9000 Scope.    This subpart prescribes policy and procedures for awarding and administering DLA-managed Federal Supply Schedules, including those for placement on FedMall.38.9001 General.    (a) Under the provisions of the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949 (40 U.S.C. 486(e)), the Administrator of General Services designates and authorizes the DoD to procure and supply personal property and non-personal services and perform related functions in support of the federal civil agencies within the terms of the Agreement between the Department of Defense and the General Services Administration Governing Supply Management Relationships Under the National Supply System (https://dlamil.dps.mil/sites/Acquisition/Shared%20Documents/Forms/AllItems.aspx?RootFolder=%2Fsites%2FAcquisition%2FShared%20Documents%2FJ%2D72%2FPROCLTR%2DFiles&FolderCTID=0x01200080FADA3E9BBF764593CF2E25DC6FA477), dated February 19, 1971, and the 1972 Supplement. Enter your email address to access documents.       (b) In accordance with the 1971 Agreement, both GSA and DoD agreed that “GSA and DSA (Defense Supply Agency, now DLA) will develop and maintain Federal Supply Schedule type contracts for Groups, Commodities, or items assigned under terms of this Agreement.”       (c) In establishing and maintaining a uniform federal supply catalog system, GSA and DoD shall coordinate to avoid unnecessary duplication (40 U.S.C. 506).38.9002 DLA–Managed Federal Supply Schedules for FedMall.    (a) DCSO contracting officers shall—       (1) Use delegated authority from GSA to establish Federal Supply Schedules in compliance with FAR Part 38 and the Agreement between the DoD and GSA Governing Supply Management Relationships Under the National Supply System, dated February 19, 1971.       (2) Consider GSA Acquisition Manual (GSAM) guidelines and GSA contracting practices when establishing Federal Supply Schedules. Contracting officers may use specific GSA clauses, procedures, and practices if determined to be in the best interest of the Government.       (3) Determine the prices of fixed-price supplies to be fair and reasonable for the purpose of establishing the Federal Supply Schedule.       (4) Determine in writing contract termination is appropriate prior to removing a contract from FedMall.
Exhibit 35.2

[First Republic Bank Logo]

Feb 29, 2016

Servicer Compliance Statement

For SEMT 2013-4 (see Schedule A)

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of First Republic Bank (the Servicer), does hereby certify that:



| | (i) | a review of the Servicers activities during the reporting period from January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015 and of its performance under the Agreement (as defined on Schedule A attached hereto) from the above
referenced trust during such period has been made under such officers supervision, and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | to the best of such officers knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under this Agreement in all material respects throughout such reporting period.
| | ---- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



First Republic BankBy:

/s/ Lionel AntunesName:

Lionel AntunesTitle:

Vice President of Residential LendingDate: Feb. 29, 2016




---

SCHEDULE A



|1. | Flow Mortgage Loan Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of July 1, 2010, between Redwood Residential Acquisition Corporation and First Republic Bank, as modified by the Reconstitution Agreement dated March 21, 2013
(the Agreement).
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
§ 850.23 Action level. ( a ) The responsible employer must include in its CBDPP an action level that is no greater than 0.2 μg/m3, calculated as an 8-hour TWA exposure, as measured in the worker's breathing zone by personal monitoring.
( b ) If an airborne concentration of beryllium is at or above the action level, the responsible employer must implement §§ 850.24(c) (periodic monitoring), 850.25 (exposure reduction and minimization), 850.26 (regulated areas), 850.27 (hygiene facilities and practices), 850.28 (respiratory protection), 850.29 (protective clothing and equipment), and 850.38 (warning signs) of this part.
#### Raymond H. Stogsdill, Appellant, v New York Telephone Company et al., Respondents.

Order unanimously affirmed, without costs, on the opinion at Special Term, Murphy J. (Appeal from order of Onondaga Supreme Court — summary judgment.) Present — Simons, J. P., Schnepp, Callahan, Doerr and Witmer, JJ.
Editorial Note on Part 51
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 51 appear at 80 FR 74980, Dec. 1, 2015.

§ 51.29 Scoping-environmental impact statement and supplement to environmental impact statement. ( a ) The scoping process for an environmental impact statement shall begin as soon as practicable after publication of the notice of intent as provided in § 51.116, and shall be used to: ( 1 ) Define the proposed action which is to be the subject of the statement or supplement. For environmental impact statements other than a supplement to an early site permit final environmental impact statement prepared for a combined license application, the provisions of 40 CFR 1502.4 will be used for this purpose. For a supplement to an early site permit final environmental impact statement prepared for a combined license application, the proposed action shall be as set forth in the relevant provisions of § 51.92(e).
( 2 ) Determine the scope of the statement and identify the significant issues to be analyzed in depth.
( 3 ) Identify and eliminate from detailed study issues which are peripheral or are not significant or which have been covered by prior environmental review. Discussion of these issues in the statement will be limited to a brief presentation of why they are peripheral or will not have a significant effect on the quality of the human environment or a reference to their coverage elsewhere.
( 4 ) Identify any environmental assessments and other environmental impact statements which are being or will be prepared that are related to but are not part of the scope of the statement under consideration.
( 5 ) Identify other environmental review and consultation requirements related to the proposed action so that other required analyses and studies may be prepared concurrently and integrated with the environmental impact statement.
( 6 ) Indicate the relationship between the timing of the preparation of environmental analyses and the Commission's tentative planning and decision-making schedule.
( 7 ) Identify any cooperating agencies, and as appropriate, allocate assignments for preparation and schedules for completion of the statement to the NRC and any cooperating agencies.
( 8 ) Describe the means by which the environmental impact statement will be prepared, including any contractor assistance to be used.
( b ) At the conclusion of the scoping process, the appropriate NRC staff director will prepare a concise summary of the determinations and conclusions reached, including the significant issues identified, and will send a copy of the summary to each participant in the scoping process.
( c ) At any time prior to issuance of the draft environmental impact statement, the appropriate NRC staff director may revise the determinations made under paragraph (b) of this section, as appropriate, if substantial changes are made in the proposed action, or if significant new circumstances or information arise which bear on the proposed action or its impacts.
[49 FR 9381, Mar. 12, 1984, as amended at 72 FR 49510, Aug. 28, 2007]
29–008 

108TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 2d Session 108–602 

PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF H.R. 4759, UNITED 

STATES-AUSTRALIA FREE TRADE AGREEMENT IMPLEMENTATION ACT 

JULY 13, 2004.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

Mr. DREIER, from the Committee on Rules, 

submitted the following 

R E P O R T 

[To accompany H. Res. 712] 

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House 

Resolution 712, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to the House 

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted. 

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution provides for consideration of H.R. 4759, the 

United States-Australia Free Trade Agreement Implementation 

Act, under a closed rule. The rule provides two hours of debate in 

the House equally divided and controlled by the chairman and 

ranking minority member of the Committee on Ways and Means. 

The rule waives all points of order against consideration of the 

bill. The resolution provides that pursuant to section 151(f)(2) of 

the Trade Act of 1974, the previous question shall be considered as 

ordered on the bill to final passage without intervening motion. 

Finally, section 2 of the resolution provides that during consideration of the bill, notwithstanding the operation of the previous 

question, the Chair may postpone further consideration of the bill 

to a time designated by the Speaker. 

The waiver of all points of order against consideration of the bill 

includes a waiver of clause 4(a) of rule XIII (requiring a three-day 

layover of the committee report), because the Committee on Ways 

and Means did not file its report (H. Rept. 108–597) until Monday, 

July 12, 2004, and the bill may be considered by the House as early 

as Wednesday, July 14. 

Æ
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 45 (Wednesday, March 7, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 13683]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-5523]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary

Aviation Proceedings, Agreements Filed the Week Ending February 
18, 2012

    The following Agreements were filed with the Department of 
Transportation under the Sections 412 and 414 of the Federal Aviation 
Act, as amended (49 U.S.C. 1382 and 1384) and procedures governing 
proceedings to enforce these provisions. Answers may be filed within 21 
days after the filing of the application.
    Docket Number: DOT-OST-2012-0024.
    Date Filed: February 16, 2012.
    Parties: Members of the International Air Transport Association.
    Subject: PTC COMP Mail Vote 701--Resolution 011a Mileage Manual, 
Non TC Member/Non IATA Carrier Sectors, Intended Effective Date 15 
March 2012, for Implementation 1 April 2012 (Memo 1663).

Renee V. Wright,
Program Manager, Docket Operations, Federal Register Liaison.
[FR Doc. 2012-5523 Filed 3-6-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P
```
227 So.2d 594

#### SUCCESSION of Mrs. Lucille McGimsey ROBINSON.

No. 50099.

Nov. 12, 1969.

In re: Mrs. Ruth Sheffield applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans. 225 So.2d 149.

Writ refused. The judgment is correct.
H. Res. 795

In the House of Representatives, U.S., 

May 18, 2006.

Whereas on April 24 and 26, 2006, a series of explosions at 

Dahab and in Northern Sinai, Egypt, planned and carried out by terrorists, resulted in the deaths of scores of 

civilians and the injury of many others; 

Whereas the people of Egypt have been subjected to several 

other deadly terrorist attacks over the past years; and 

Whereas President George W. Bush called President Hosni 

Mubarak of Egypt to extend condolences on behalf of the 

American people for the loss of life: Now, therefore, be 

it

Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

(1) condemns in the strongest terms the terrorist 

attacks on Dahab and Northern Sinai, Egypt and other 

terrorist attacks directed against Egypt; 

(2) expresses its condolences to the families and 

friends of those individuals who were killed in the attacks and expresses its sympathies to those individuals 

who have been injured; 

(3) joins with President George W. Bush in expressing the solidarity of the people and Government of 
2

•HRES 795 EH 

the United States with the people and Government of 

Egypt as they recover from these cowardly and inhuman 

attacks; and 

(4) expresses its readiness to support the Egyptian 

authorities in their efforts to bring to justice those individuals responsible for the recent attacks in Egypt and 

to pursue, disrupt, undermine, and dismantle the networks which plan and carry out such attacks.

Attest: 

Clerk.
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. James Daniels, Jr., Appellant, v. Warden, Queens House of Detention, Respondent.

In a habeas corpus proceeding (erroneously treated as a duplication of a *corcm nobis*motion which had been previously denied) with respect to a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered January 24, 1964, convicting appellant of murder in the second degree, on his plea of guilty, the proceeding being predicated on the ground that at the time of the acceptance of the plea appellant was not afforded the warning prescribed in section 335-b (now § 335-c) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the appeal is from an order of said court dated September 14, 1967 which denied the application. Order affirmed, without costs. While the application was erroneously treated as above noted, we have considered the application in its habeas corpus perspective and find it to be without merit. In our opinion, section 335-b of the Code of Criminal Procedure (now § 335-c) was inapplicable to the crime of murder in the second degree to which relator pleaded guilty. This crime was punishable under section 1048 of the former Penal Law, which contained no prescription or express authorization for different or additional punishment predicated on a prior conviction as contemplated by said section 335-b. Nor, in view of the provision in said section 1048 for a maximum sentence of life imprisonment, may any minimum imposed in excess of the 20-year minimum therein set forth be deemed different punishment so as to render section 335-b applicable *(People*v. *Buckley,*178 Misc. 545; *People*v. *Martin,*52 Misc 2d 571; see, also, *People*v. *Washington,*264 N. Y. 338). Beldock, P. J., Christ, Hopkins, Munder and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.