Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 249 / Wednesday, December 29, 2010 / Notices 82073 

Consent_Decrees.html. A copy of the 

proposed consent decree may also be 

obtained by mail from the Consent 

Decree Library, P.O. Box 7611, U.S. 

Department of Justice, Washington, DC 

20044–7611 or by faxing or e-mailing a 

request to Tonia Fleetwood 

(tonia.fleetwood@usdoj.gov), fax no. 

(202) 514–0097, phone confirmation 

number (202) 514–1547. In requesting a 

copy from the Consent Decree Library, 

please enclose a check in the amount of 

$28.75 (25 cents per page reproduction 

cost) payable to the U.S. Treasury or, if 

by e-mail or fax, forward a check in that 

amount to the Consent Decree Library at 

the stated address. 

Maureen M. Katz, 

Assistant Chief, Environmental Enforcement 

Section, Environment and Natural Resources 

Division. 

[FR Doc. 2010–32661 Filed 12–28–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–15–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Drug Enforcement Administration 

Manufacturer of Controlled 

Substances; Notice of Application 

Pursuant to § 1301.33(a), Title 21 of 

the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), 

this is notice that on November 3, 2010, 

Siegfried (USA), 33 Industrial Park 

Road, Pennsville, New Jersey 08070, 

made application by renewal to the 

Drug Enforcement Administration 

(DEA) to be registered as a bulk 

manufacturer of the basic classes of 

controlled substances listed in 

schedules I and II: 

Drug Schedule 

Gamma Hydroxybutyric Acid 

(2010).

I 

Dihydromorphine (9145) ............... I 

Amphetamine (1100) .................... II 

Methylphenidate (1724) ................ II 

Amobarbital (2125) ....................... II 

Pentobarbital (2270) ..................... II 

Secobarbital (2315) ...................... II 

Glutethimide (2550) ...................... II 

Codeine (9050) ............................. II 

Oxycodone (9143) ........................ II 

Hydromorphone (9150) ................ II 

Hydrocodone (9193) ..................... II 

Methadone (9250) ........................ II 

Methadone intermediate (9254) ... II 

Dextropropoxyphene, bulk (nondosage forms) (9273).II 

Morphine (9300) ........................... II 

Oxymorphone (9652) ................... II 

Oxycodone (9143) ........................ II 

The company plans to manufacture 

the listed controlled substances in bulk 

for distribution to its customers. 

Any other such applicant, and any 

person who is presently registered with 

DEA to manufacture such substances, 

may file comments or objections to the 

issuance of the proposed registration 

pursuant to 21 CFR 1301.33(a). 

Any such written comments or 

objections should be addressed, in 

quintuplicate, to the Drug Enforcement 

Administration, Office of Diversion 

Control, Federal Register Representative 

(ODL), 8701 Morrissette Drive, 

Springfield, Virginia 22152; and must be 

filed no later than February 28, 2011. 

Dated: December 20, 2010. 

Joseph T. Rannazzisi, 

Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of 

Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement 

Administration. 

[FR Doc. 2010–32855 Filed 12–28–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–09–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Federal Bureau of Prisons 

Notice of Intent To Prepare a Draft 

Environmental Impact Statement 

AGENCY: Federal Bureau of Prisons, U.S. 

Department of Justice. 

ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare a 

draft environmental impact statement. 

SUMMARY: Notice of Intent to Prepare a 

Draft Environmental Impact Statement 

(DEIS) for development of a Federal 

Correctional Institution and Federal 

Prison Camp by the U.S. Department of 

Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons 

(BOP). Land under consideration for 

development consists of areas located 

on BOP-owned property comprising the 

U.S. Penitentiary (USP) in Leavenworth, 

Kansas. 

Background 

The Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP) 

is responsible for carrying out 

judgments of the federal courts 

whenever a period of confinement is 

ordered. The mission of the BOP is to 

protect society by confining offenders in 

the controlled environments of prisons 

and community-based facilities that are 

safe, humane, cost-efficient and 

appropriately secure, and that provide 

work and other self-improvement 

opportunities to assist offenders in 

becoming law-abiding citizens. 

The BOP is facing continuous growth 

in the number of federal inmates with 

projections showing the federal inmate 

population increasing from 210,227 

inmates at the end of fiscal year 2010 to 

over 226,000 inmates by the end of 

fiscal year 2013. As such, the demand 

for bedspace within the federal prison 

system continues to grow at a significant 

rate. At the present time, the federal 

inmate population exceeds the 

combined rated capacities of the 

existing 116 federal correctional 

facilities. 

The federal inmate population has 

grown dramatically over the past two 

decades. While the BOP is no longer 

experiencing the dramatic population 

increases of between 10,000 and 11,000 

inmates per year that occurred from 

1998 to 2001, the increases are still 

significant and a net growth of over 

6,000 inmates is projected for FY 2011 

and 5,600 is projected for FY 2012. The 

federal inmate population is projected 

to increase and continue to exceed the 

rated capacity of the BOP’s 116 

institutions and current contract 

facilities. Currently, the BOP is 36 

percent above rated capacity systemwide in the federal prison system, 43 

percent over rated capacity at medium 

security facilities, and 53 percent over 

rated capacity at high security 

institutions. As in the past, the BOP will 

continue to increase the number of beds 

through additional contract beds, 

acquisition and adaptation of existing 

facilities, and new prison construction 

as funding permits. Adding capacity 

through these various means, allows the 

BOP the opportunity to work towards 

keeping prison crowding at manageable 

levels to ensure both public safety and 

the safety of inmates within the BOP 

institutions. 

In the face of the continuing increase 

in the federal prison population, one 

way the BOP has expanded its capacity 

is through construction of new 

institutions. As part of this effort, the 

BOP has a facilities planning program 

featuring the identification and 

evaluation of sites for new facilities. The 

BOP routinely identifies prospective 

sites that may be appropriate for 

development of new federal correctional 

facilities determined by the need for 

such facilities in various parts of the 

country and the resources available to 

meet that need. 

The BOP routinely screens and 

evaluates private and public properties 

located throughout the nation for 

possible use and development. Over the 

past decade, the BOP has examined 

prospective sites for new correctional 

facilities development in Alabama, 

Kentucky, New Hampshire, Arizona, 

Mississippi, West Virginia, California 

and other locations around the country 

and has undertaken environmental 

impact studies in compliance with the 

National Environmental Policy Act of 

1969, as amended. 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
82074 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 249 / Wednesday, December 29, 2010 / Notices 

Proposed Action 

The BOP is facing increased bedspace 

shortages throughout the federal prison 

system. Over the past decade, a 

significant influx of inmates has entered 

the federal prison system with a large 

portion of this influx originating from 

the north central region of the United 

States. In response, the BOP has 

committed significant resources to 

identifying and developing sites for new 

federal correctional facilities within this 

region including development of 

facilities in Florence, Colorado; Terre 

Haute, Indiana; Greenville, Illinois; and 

Waseca, Minnesota. Even with the 

development of new and expanded 

facilities, projections show the federal 

inmate population continuing to 

increase, placing additional demands 

for bedspace within the BOP’s North 

Central Region. 

In response, the BOP has undertaken 

preliminary investigations in an effort to 

identify prospective sites capable of 

accommodating federal correctional 

facilities and communities willing to 

host such facilities. Through this 

process, the BOP has identified 

potential locations for development of 

new federal correctional facilities and 

several sites are under active 

consideration. These potential sites 

were subjected to initial studies by the 

BOP and those considered suitable for 

correctional facility development will 

be evaluated further by the BOP in a 

DEIS that will analyze the potential 

impacts of facility construction and 

operation. 

The Process 

The process of evaluating the 

potential environmental impacts 

associated with federal correctional 

facility development and operation 

involves the analysis of many factors 

and features including, but not limited 

to: Topography, geology, soils, 

hydrology, biological resources, cultural 

resources, hazardous materials, visual 

and aesthetics features, fiscal 

considerations, population/ 

employment/housing characteristics, 

community services and facilities, land 

uses, utility services, transportation 

systems, meteorological conditions, air 

quality, and noise. 

Alternatives 

In developing the DEIS, the No Action 

alternative, other actions considered 

and eliminated, and alternative 

development areas for the proposed 

Federal Correctional Institution and 

Federal Prison Camp will be examined. 

The areas examined will consist of BOPowned property contiguous to the 

existing Leavenworth Institution and 

will be further defined in the EIS 

process. 

Scoping Process 

During the preparation of the DEIS, 

there will be opportunities for public 

involvement in order to determine the 

issues to be examined. A Public Scoping 

Meeting will be held at 7 p.m., January 

20, 2011, at the Riverfront Community 

Center (123 S. Esplanade Street, 

Leavenworth, Kansas). The meeting 

location, date, and time will be wellpublicized and have been arranged to 

allow for the public as well as interested 

agencies and organizations to attend and 

formally express their views on the 

scope and significant issues to be 

studied as part of the DEIS process. The 

Scoping Meeting is being held to 

provide for timely public comments and 

understanding of federal plans and 

programs with possible environmental 

consequences as required by the 

National Environmental Policy Act of 

1969, as amended, and the National 

Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as 

amended. 

Availability of DEIS 

Public notice will be given concerning 

the availability of the DEIS for public 

review and comment. 

Contact 

Questions concerning the proposed 

action and the DEIS may be directed to: 

Richard A. Cohn, Chief, or Bridgette 

Lyles, Site Selection Specialist, Capacity 

Planning and Site Selection Branch, 

U.S. Department of Justice, Federal 

Bureau of Prisons, 320 First Street, NW., 

Washington, DC 20534, Telephone: 

202–514–6470/Facsimile: 202–616– 

6024/E-mail: siteselection@bop.gov. 

Dated: December 17, 2010. 

Richard A. Cohn, 

Chief, Capacity Planning and Site Selection. 

[FR Doc. 2010–32317 Filed 12–28–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE P 

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR 

Mine Safety and Health Administration 

Fee Adjustment for Testing, 

Evaluation, and Approval of Mining 

Products 

AGENCY: Mine Safety and Health 

Administration (MSHA), Labor. 

ACTION: Notice of fee adjustment. 

SUMMARY: This notice describes MSHA’s 

revised fee schedule for testing, 

evaluating, and approving mining 

products as provided by 30 CFR part 5. 

MSHA charges applicants a fee to cover 

its direct and indirect costs associated 

with testing, evaluating, and approval of 

equipment and materials manufactured 

for use in the mining industry. The new 

fee schedule, effective January 1, 2011, 

is based on MSHA’s direct and indirect 

costs for providing services during fiscal 

year (FY) 2010. 

DATES: This fee schedule is effective 

January 1, 2011. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John 

P. Faini, Chief, Approval and 

Certification Center, 304–547–2029 or 

304–547–0400. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Background 

Under 30 CFR 5.50, each fee schedule 

shall remain in effect for at least one 

year and be subject to revision at least 

once every three years. MSHA’s existing 

fee schedule, revised December 24, 2008 

(73 FR 79195) became effective January 

1, 2009. 

Under 30 CFR 5.30(a), Part 15 fees for 

services provided to MSHA by other 

organizations may be set by those 

organizations. In addition, under 30 

CFR 5.40, when the nature of the 

product requires MSHA to test and 

evaluate the product at a location other 

than on MSHA premises, MSHA is 

allowed to charge actual travel expenses 

in addition to the fees charged for 

evaluation and testing. 

II. Fee Computation 

MSHA computed the 2011 fees using 

FY 2010 costs for baseline data. MSHA 

calculated a weighted-average based on 

the direct and indirect costs to 

applicants for testing, evaluation, and 

approval services provided in FY 2010. 

From this average, MSHA computed a 

single hourly rate, which applies 

uniformly to all applications. 

As a result of this process, MSHA has 

determined that as of January 1, 2011, 

the fee will be $97 per hour for services 

provided. 

III. Applicable Fee 

• Applications postmarked before 

January 1, 2011: MSHA will process 

these applications under the 2009 

hourly rate of $90. 

• Applications postmarked on or after 

January 1, 2011: MSHA will process 

these applications under the 2011 

hourly rate of $97. This information is 

available on MSHA’s Web site at 

http://www.msha.gov. 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES