alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# EUR-Lex - 31989R3745 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31989R3745

**Commission Regulation (EEC) No 3745/89 of 13 December 1989 amending Regulation (EEC) No 2220/85 laying down common detailed rules for the application of the system of securities for agricultural products **

*
Official Journal L 364 , 14/12/1989 P. 0054 - 0054 Finnish special edition: Chapter 3 Volume 30 P. 0237 Swedish special edition: Chapter 3 Volume 30 P. 0237 *

*****

COMMISSION REGULATION (EEC) No 3745/89

of 13 December 1989

amending Regulation (EEC) No 2220/85 laying down common detailed rules for the application of the system of securities for agricultural products

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 1491/85 of 23 May 1985 laying down special measures in respect of soya beans (1), as last amended by Regulation (EEC) No 2217/88 (2), and in particular Article 2 (8) thereof,

Whereas the first Article of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2220/85 (3), as last amended by Regulation (EEC) No 1181/87 (4), refers to Community agricultural Regulations which require that a security be given to ensure payment of a sum due if an obligation is not met;

Whereas neither Council Regulation (EEC) No 1491/85 nor Regulation (EEC) No 2194/85 of 25 July 1985 adopting general rules concerning special measures for soya beans (5), as last amended by Regulation (EEC) No 1231/89 (6), although introducing a security system, are mentioned in Article 1 of Regulation (EEC) No 2220/85; whereas, therefore, in order to ensure a uniform interpretation covering also the aforesaid system, Regulation (EEC) No 2220/85 should be completed accordingly;

Whereas the measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of all the relevant Management Committees,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

In Regulation (EEC) No 2220/85, the following point (g) is added to Article 1:

'(g) Regulation (EEC) No 1491/85 (soya beans) (*).

(*) OJ No L 151, 10. 6. 1985, p. 15.'

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 13 December 1989.

For the Commission

Ray MAC SHARRY

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ No L 151, 10. 6. 1985, p. 15.

(2) OJ No L 197, 26. 7. 1988, p. 11.

(3) OJ No L 205, 3. 8. 1985, p. 5.

(4) OJ No L 113, 30. 4. 1987, p. 31.

(5) OJ No L 204, 2. 8. 1985, p. 1.

(6) OJ No L 128, 11. 5. 1989, p. 24.
MEMORANDUM 

DATE: April 11, 2015

TO: Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket Id: OAR–2013-0602

FROM: Howard J. Hoffman, EPA - OGC

SUBJECT: March 31, 2015 Meeting with Advanced Energy Economy Regarding Proposed 

Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants

SUMMARY

On March 31, 2015, Aileen Roder (EPA-OGC), Kevin Culligan (EPA-OAR-OAQPS), Matt 

Clouse (EPA-OAR-OAP) and I met with Arvin Ganesan and Malcolm Wolfe of Advanced 

Energy Economy to discuss legal issues concerning the proposed Clean Power Plan for existing 

power plants.
#### ORR v. HAMBURG—AMERIKANISCHE PACKETFAHRT ACTIEN GESELLSCHAFT (HAMBURG-AMERICAN LINE).

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

January 29, 1915.)

Action by Orton G. Orr against the Hamburg-Amerikanische Packetfahrt Actien Gesellschaft (Hamburg-American Line).

No opinion. Motion denied, with $10 costs. Order filed. See, also, 150 N. Y. Supp. 268.
§ 1134.320 Intangible property: disclosures, reports, and requests. ( a ) *Requirement.* REP Article III of a DoD Component's general terms and conditions must specify the requirement described in § 1134.300(a)(3) and provide the references described in § 1134.300(b)(5) and (6) to requirements in other articles for disclosures, reports, and requests related to intangible property.
( b ) *Award terms and conditions* — ( 1 ) *General.* To implement the requirement described in paragraph (a) of this section, a DoD Component's general terms and conditions must use the wording appendix C to this part provides for Section D of REP Article III.
( 2 ) *Exceptions.* A DoD Component may reserve: ( i ) Section D of REP Article III if it determines that no recipients of awards using its general terms and conditions, or subrecipients of subawards under those awards, will have any intangible property for which they will be accountable to the Federal Government; or
( ii ) Any of paragraphs D.1 through D.3, if it determines that no recipients of awards using its general terms and conditions, or subrecipients of subawards under those awards, will be accountable to the Federal Government for the particular types of intangible property addressed by those paragraphs.
§ 840.5 Criterion II—Substantial damages to persons offsite or property offsite. ( a ) After DOE has determined that an event has satisfied Criterion I, DOE will determine that the event has resulted or will probably result in substantial damages to persons offsite or property offsite if any of the following findings are made: ( 1 ) DOE finds that such event has resulted in the death or hospitalization, within 30 days of the event, of five or more people located offsite showing objective clinical evidence of physical injury from exposure to the radioactive, toxic, explosive, or other hazardous properties of source, special nuclear, or byproduct material; or
( 2 ) DOE finds that $2,500,000 or more of damage offsite has been or will probably be sustained by any one person, or $5 million or more of such damage in the aggregate has been or will probably be sustained, as the result of such event; or
( 3 ) DOE finds that $5,000 or more of damage offsite has been or will probably be sustained by each of 50 or more persons, provided that $1 million or more of such damage in the aggregate has been or will probably be sustained, as the result of such event.
( b ) As used in paragraphs (a) (2) and (3) of this section “damage” shall be that arising out of or resulting from the radioactive, toxic, explosive, or other hazardous properties of source, special nuclear, or byproduct material, and shall be based upon estimates of one or more of the following: ( 1 ) Total cost necessary to put affected property back into use.
( 2 ) Loss of use of affected property.
( 3 ) Value of affected property where not practical to restore to use.
( 4 ) Financial loss resulting from protective actions appropriate to reduce or avoid exposure to radiation or to radioactive materials.
DOE Analysis in Support of the EPA Evaluation of Waivers of the 

Renewable Fuel Standard

Impacts of the Waivers on the Energy Portion of the Consumer 

Price Index 

DOE utilized the Bureau of Labor Statistics Consumer Price Index (CPI)1

methodology to calculate the energy component effects on the CPI. Below are the 

estimated impacts on the energy component of CPI for the two ISU cases.

 

Iowa State 

Mean 

Estimate

Iowa State 

Mandate 

Binds

Units

Change in Blended Fuel 

Price with Waiver $/gallon -$0.002 -$0.016

Change in Energy CPI with 

Waiver percent -0.03% -0.23%

Below is an example worksheet with the weights of energy prices calculated in 

both the wholesale and consumer price indices. The first column is the actual 

weights in the equation; the second column recalculates the equation weights to 

give the detailed energy price impacts on the overall WPI (wholesale price index) 

or CPI. DOE used these weights to calculate how changes in energy prices would 

impact overall CPI and WPI.

 1 BLS tables may be found at http://www.bls.gov/cpi/cpiri2011.pdf for the CPI and 

www.bls.gov/ppi and select PPI Tables, ftb://ftp.bls.gov/pub/special.requests/ppi/sopnew12.txt 

for the WPI
2
3

Monetary Impact of the Waivers by Household

DOE estimated the economic impacts of the RFS waivers on the average and first 

quintile of households using data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics Consumer 

Expenditure Survey, 2011, and the Household Vehicles Energy Use: Latest Data 

& Trends, from the Energy Information Administration (EIA) DOE/EIA-0464 

(2005), November, 2005. Estimates for annual gasoline consumption for average 

and first quintile households by income were taken from the EIA Household 

Vehicle Energy Use report; average and first quintile household expenditure and 

income after taxes data were taken from the BLS consumer expenditure survey, 

2011. Estimates of the changes in consumer expenditures, the percentage change 

in annual household expenditures, and the changes as a percent of income after 

taxes were derived for the two ISU scenarios: mean estimate and binding 

mandate. The table below presents the estimates based on the two scenarios:

Impacts on Energy CPI and Gasoline Expenditures for Average and Low Income 

Households 

Iowa State 

Mean 

Estimate

Iowa State 

Mandate 

Binds

Units

Change in Blended Fuel Price with Waiver $/gallon -$0.002 -$0.016

Change in Annual Expenditures on 

Gasoline For Average Household with 

Vehicles

$ -$1.98 -$17.40

Change in Annual Expenditures on 

Gasoline For Lowest Quintile Households 

with Vehicles

$ -$1.20 $10.49

Change as a Percentage of Consumer 

Expenditures for Average Household with 

Vehicles

percent 0.00% -0.04%

Change as a Percentage of Consumer 

Expenditures for Lowest Quintile of Vehicle 

Owners

percent -0.01% -0.05%

Change as a Percentage of Income After 

Taxes for Average Household with 

Vehicles

percent 0.00% -0.03%

Change as a Percentage of Income After 

Taxes for Lowest Quintile with Vehicles percent -0.01% -0.10%
#### § 62.3 Communications.

Except where otherwise specified, all communications and reports concerning the regulations in this part and applications filed under them should be sent by mail addressed: ATTN: Document Control Desk, Director, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001; by hand delivery to the NRC's offices at 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland; or, where practicable, by electronic submission, for example, via Electronic Information Exchange, or CD-ROM. Electronic submissions must be made in a manner that enables the NRC to receive, read, authenticate, distribute, and archive the submission, and process and retrieve it a single page at a time. Detailed guidance on making electronic submissions can be obtained by visiting the NRC's Web site at *http://www.nrc.gov/site-help/e-submittals.html*; by e-mail to *MSHD.Resource@nrc.gov*; or by writing the Office of the Chief Information Officer, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001. The guidance discusses, among other topics, the formats the NRC can accept, the use of electronic signatures, and the treatment of nonpublic information.

[73 FR 5725, Jan. 31, 2008, as amended at 74 FR 62683, Dec. 1, 2009; 79 FR 75740, Dec. 19, 2014; 80 FR 74980, Dec. 1, 2015]
Glossary

Allergic reaction - Can 

include rash, itching, swelling, 

sneezing, runny nose, or 

trouble breathing due to 

contact with things a person is 

allergic to. 

Bug - General term for insects. 

The term “bug” refers to 

insects with two pairs of wings 

and “beak” mouthparts for 

piercing and sucking plant 

juices or other insects. 

Castings - “Worm poop” that 

forms pellets or small piles. 

Earthworm castings put 

nutrients back into the soil. 

Caterpillar - What a moth or 

butterfly looks like in the larval 

stage of its life cycle. 

Compost - A mixture of 

organic leftovers that may 

include rotted plant materials, 

manure, and eggshells. Added 

to your garden, it nourishes 

the soil and plants. 

Insect - An organism with 

three body parts (head, thorax, 

abdomen) and three pairs of 

jointed legs. Most numerous 

type of creatures on earth. 

Insecticide - A pesticide that 

kills insects. 

Integrated Pest Management 

(IPM) - Choosing among 

various ways to treat pest 

problems. The goal is to cause 

least harm to the environment. 

Larva - The second 

developmental stage for an 

insect that has a four-stage life 

cycle: egg, larva, pupa, adult. 

Lyme Disease - A flu-like 

illness caused by the bite of an 

infected deer tick. 

Mulch - A layer of material 

that gardeners place over the 

soil to reduce weeds and hold 

moisture. 

Native - A plant or animal that 

is an original inhabitant of 

where you live. 

Natural Enemy - Something 

existing in nature that kills or 

eats an organism. 

Nutrients - Substances that 

organisms need to live and 

grow. 

Nymph - A young insect that 

has not yet developed into its 

adult stage. Nymphs look like 

adults but lack fully-formed 

wings. 

Organism - A living plant or 

animal. 

Parasite - An organism that 

lives off another organism in a 

way that harms it. 

Pathogen - Something that 

causes disease or death in an 

organism. 

Pest - Something that shows 

up where you don't want it. 

Examples can include weeds, 

insects, mold, rodents, and 

bacteria. 

Pesticide - A substance used 

for keeping pests away, killing 

them, or reducing their 

numbers. EPA registers — or 

licenses — pesticides. 

Poison - A substance that 

kills, injures, or impairs an 

organism through chemical 

action. 

Predator - An organism that 

kills and eats other organisms. 

Prey - An animal that another 

animal hunts for food. 

Spore - A single plant or 

animal cell that is able to grow 

into a new plant or animal. 

Toxic - A word that means 

"poisonous in certain 

amounts." 

Weed - An unwanted plant. 

United States Environmental Protection Agency 2003 25
MARCH 10, 2006 MARCH 10, 2006

EDITION

A L SPECI

Retirement News 

for Employers 

A L

EDITION

MARCH 10, 2006 

Helping Business Owners with Retirement Plans 

Internal Revenue Service Tax Exempt and Government Entities 

IRS Offers Relief to Employers with SIMPLE IRA Plans 

Employee Plans (EP) established an examination project on SIMPLE IRA plans in January 2005. During 

the initial phase of the project, EP examiners discovered that many employers had failed to update their 

plans for the provisions of the Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001 (EGTRRA). 

Some employers questioned whether there was a need to amend their SIMPLE IRA plans for EGTRRA. 

The answer is a resounding “Yes.” 

Examiners were instructed, based on early findings, to check the date on the employers’ plan documents. 

They were seeing a significant number of SIMPLE IRA plans that had not been updated for EGTRRA. 

Plans not in compliance with this requirement could lose all the retirement savings and tax benefits that these 

plans provide to both the employers sponsoring them and the employees participating in them. 

Based on these findings, EP is offering employers with SIMPLE IRA plans an extended time to update their 

plans for the provisions of EGTRRA. Employers that previously failed to amend their SIMPLE IRA plans 

for EGTRRA have until December 31, 2006, to either adopt the latest version of the IRS model SIMPLE 

IRA plan (revised August 2005) or adopt another SIMPLE IRA plan document that that has been updated 

for EGTRRA. 

Through a review of 2004 Form W-2 information, EP identified approximately 190,000 employers with 

SIMPLE IRA plans. EP is planning on sending these employers a letter informing them of this limited relief 

opportunity so they can update their SIMPLE IRA plans for EGTRRA if they have not already done so. 

EP has information on the Retirement Plans Community web page on this initiative with links to: 

• SIMPLE IRA Plan Relief for Employers (Letter 4083); 

• SIMPLE IRA Plan Relief — Pension/IRA Department (Letter 4084); 

• Relief for SIMPLE IRA Plans FAQs; 

• EGTRRA Background Paper; and 

• Form 5304-SIMPLE and Form 5305-SIMPLE. 

The mail-out effort will start in early March, with an initial test mailing of 1,000 letters. Subsequent mailings 

will start in early April, with a plan to mail out between 10,000 and 15,000 letters a week until all 190,000 

have been mailed out.
#### § 835.201 [Reserved]
Editorial Note on Part 2
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

§ 2.911 Admissibility of restricted data or other national security information. A presiding officer shall not receive any Restricted Data or other National Security Information in evidence unless: ( a ) The relevance and materiality of the Restricted Data or other National Security Information to the issues in the proceeding, and its competence, are clearly established; and
( b ) The exclusion of the Restricted Data or other National Security Information would prejudice the interests of a party or the public interest.
[41 FR 53329, Dec. 6, 1976, as amended at 86 FR 43401, Aug. 9, 2021]
###### Editorial Note on Part 51

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 51 appear at 80 FR 74980, Dec. 1, 2015.

#### § 51.1 Scope.

This part contains environmental protection regulations applicable to NRC's domestic licensing and related regulatory functions. These regulations do not apply to export licensing matters within the scope of part 110 of this chapter or to any environmental effects which NRC's domestic licensing and related regulatory functions may have upon the environment of foreign nations. Subject to these limitations, the regulations in this part implement:

(a) Section 102(2) of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as amended.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-01-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-04-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-02-2000
<CASH>                                           1,072
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,353
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      2,644
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 9,183
<PP&E>                                         215,818
<DEPRECIATION>                                  83,376
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 155,938
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           26,088
<BONDS>                                         46,349
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           154
<OTHER-SE>                                      83,347<F1>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   155,938
<SALES>                                         53,146
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                53,146
<CGS>                                           13,363
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   49,212
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (40)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 680
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,294
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,120
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,174
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,174
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.18
<FN>
<F1>Net of Treasury Stock
</FN>


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 66 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                      February 2, 2005.
    Resolved, That the following Members be, and are hereby, elected to the 
following standing committees of the House of Representatives:
    Committee on Education and the Workforce: Mr. Souder to rank after Mr. 
Johnson of Texas.
    Committee on Financial Services: Mr. Pearce to rank after Mr. Gerlach.
    Committee on International Relations: Mr. Barrett of South Carolina to rank 
after Mr. Boozman.
    Committee on Small Business: Mr. Shuster to rank after Mr. Akin, Mr. Bradley 
of New Hampshire to rank after Mrs. Musgrave and Mr. Keller to rank after Mr. 
McCotter.
    Committee on Veterans' Affairs: Mr. Nunes to rank after Ms. Brown-Waite and 
Mr. Turner.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
<Page>

                                                               Exhibit 10.9

                    GRANAHAN MCCOURT ACQUISITION CORPORATION

JULY 24, 2006

Granahan McCourt Capital, LLC
179 Stony Brook Road
Hopewell, NJ 08525

Ladies and Gentlemen:

     This letter will confirm our agreement that commencing on July 1, 2006
Granahan McCourt Capital, LLC ("Capital") shall make available to Granahan
McCourt Acquisition Corporation ("GMC") certain office space and general and
administrative services as may be required by GMC, situated at 179 Stony
Brook Road, Hopewell, NJ 08525, and/or their offices at 167 Stony Brook Road,
or any other office space Capital occupies. In exchange therefore, GMC shall
pay Capital the sum of $10,000 per month. GMC will pay Capital the $10,000
monthly fee each month until the earlier of (i) the completion of GMC's
initial business combination and (ii) GMC's dissolution.

                  [REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]

<Page>


                                Very truly yours,

                                GRANAHAN MCCOURT ACQUISITION CORPORATION

                                By:    /s/ David C. McCourt
                                       --------------------------------------
                                Name:  David C. McCourt
                                Title: President, Chief Executive Officer and
                                       Chairman of the Board


AGREED AND ACCEPTED

GRANAHAN MCCOURT CAPITAL, LLC

By:    /s/ David C. McCourt
       ---------------------------
Name:  David C. McCourt
Title: Chief Executive Officer and
       Chairman
§ 603.500 Pre-award business evaluation. ( a ) The contracting officer must determine the qualification of the recipient, as described in §§ 603.510 and 603.515.
( b ) As the business expert working with the program official, the contracting officer also must address the financial aspects of the proposed agreement. The contracting officer must: ( 1 ) Determine that the total amount of funding for the proposed effort is reasonable, as addressed in § 603.520.
( 2 ) Assess the value and determine the reasonableness of the recipient's proposed cost sharing contribution, as discussed in §§ 603.525 through 603.555.
( 3 ) If contemplating the use of a fixed-support rather than expenditure-based TIA, ensure that its use is justified, as explained in §§ 603.560 and 603.565.
( 4 ) Determine amounts for milestone payments, if used, as discussed in § 603.570.