alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV 

House Calendar No. 169 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 724 

[Report No. 109–446] 

Honoring Leonidas Ralph Mecham, Director of the Administrative Office 

of the United States Courts and Secretary of the Judicial Conference 

of the United States. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 14, 2006 

Mr. SENSENBRENNER (for himself, Mr. CONYERS, Mr. CANNON, Mr. SMITH

of Texas, Mr. INGLIS of South Carolina, Mr. FEENEY, Mr. SCOTT of Virginia, and Mr. COBLE) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

APRIL 27, 2006 

Additional sponsor: Ms. WATERS

APRIL 27, 2006 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

RESOLUTION 

Honoring Leonidas Ralph Mecham, Director of the Administrative Office of the United States Courts and Secretary 

of the Judicial Conference of the United States. 

Whereas Ralph Mecham has served under three chief justices 

for more than 20 years as the Director of the Administrative Office of the United States Courts, earning him 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 724 RH 

the distinction of the longest serving director in the agency’s history; 

Whereas Ralph Mecham has focused on enhancing support to 

the Judicial Conference; 

Whereas Ralph Mecham has worked to secure sufficient resources for the judiciary in tight budget climates; 

Whereas Ralph Mecham assisted in the creation of a program 

to obtain funding for new courthouses to replace aging, 

unsafe facilities, and to enhance judicial security; 

Whereas Ralph Mecham championed innovations that have 

enhanced court administration by decentralizing financial 

and management responsibilities, thereby providing more 

flexibility to district and circuit courts; and 

Whereas Ralph Mecham encouraged the development and incorporation into the judicial system of the latest technology, which has resulted in major improvements in 

court efficiency, presentation of evidence, and access to 

court records: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) commends Leonidas Ralph Mecham for his 

3 steadfast loyalty and unwavering dedication to the 

4 judiciary and to the public; 

5 (2) recognizes Leonidas Ralph Mecham for his 

6 more than 20 years of outstanding public service to 

7 the Federal judiciary and to the Nation; and 

8 (3) honors Leonidas Ralph Mecham on the oc9 casion of his retirement from the Administrative Of10 fice of the United States Courts. 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS

jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
House Calendar No. 169 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 724 

[Report No. 109

–446] 

RESOLUTION 

Honoring Leonidas Ralph Mecham, Director of the 

of the United States. Courts and Secretary of the Judicial Conference Administrative Office of the United States 

APRIL 27, 2006 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 


jlentini on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Ray Santiago, Appellant.

[816 NYS2d 33]

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Margaret Clancy, J.), rendered October 3, 2003, convicting defendant, after a nonjury trial, of two counts of promoting prison contraband in the first degree, and sentencing him to concurrent terms of 2 to 4 years, unanimously affirmed.

*467The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. There is no basis for disturbing the court’s determinations concerning credibility *(see People v Gaimari,*176 NY 84, 94 [1903]). The evidence supports the conclusion that defendant knowingly possessed the prison contraband that was in his pocket *(see People v Reisman,*29 NY2d 278, 285-286 [1971], *cert denied*405 US 1041 [1972]).

Defendant’s claim that the People made improper use of his pretrial silence is unpreserved because, in this regard, he made only a general objection during the officer’s testimony, and no objection at all during the People’s summation. We decline to review this claim in the interest of justice. Were we to review this claim, we would find that any error was harmless, particularly in this nonjury trial where the court is considered capable of disregarding such evidence *(see People v Moreno,*70 NY2d 403, 406 [1987]). Concur—Sullivan, J.P., Williams, Gonzalez, Catterson and McGuire, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 679 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 679

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                     February 15, 2006.
    Resolved, That the following named Member be, and he is hereby, elected to 
the following standing committee of the House of Representatives:
    Committee on Education and the Workforce: Mr. McKeon, Chairman.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Rialto
CAPITAL
    February
28, 2014
   To:
 Barclays
Commercial Mortgage Securities, LLC, as Depositor 
U.S.
Bank National Association, as Trustee, Certificate Administrator and
Paying Agent 
Midland Loan Services, a Division ofPNC Bank, National Association, as
Master Servicer
   2013
Annual Statement of Servicer Compliance (Item 1123)
  Name
of Motgage Loan Pass-Through Cetiificate Series:
  - UBS
2013-C6
  (Referred
to herein as "Security Agreement" or "Security Agreements") 
The
undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC,
as special servicer (the 
"Special Servicer") herein cetiifies to the following:
  1. 
2.
3.
 All
servicing activities and performance of such servicing activities under
Agreements
are performed on behalf of the Special Servicer.
A
review of the servicing activities and performance by the Special
Servicer for the period of

April25,
2013 to December 31, 2013 (the "Repotiing Period") in accordance with
the servicing 
agreements applicable to each Security Agreement has been conducted
under my supervision. 
To
the best of my knowledge, the Special Servicer has fulfilled all of its
obligations under the 
terms
of the Security Agreements, in all material respects for the Repotiing
Period and if there 
has been a failure to fulfill any such obligations in any material
respect, each failure and the 
nature and status thereof has been specifically identified herewith.
    Cetiified
by: /s/Thekla Salzman
 Date:
February 28, 2014
  Thekla Salzman 
Chief
Administrative Officer
§ 1132.105 Content of PROC Article I. ( a ) *Requirement.* A DoD Component's general terms and conditions must address requirements for States' procurement systems.
( b ) *Award terms and conditions* — ( 1 ) *General.* Except as provided in paragraph (b)(2) of this section, a DoD Component's general terms and conditions must use the wording appendix A to this part provides for PROC Article I.
( 2 ) *Exception.* A DoD Component's general terms and conditions may instead reserve PROC Article I if the DoD Component determines that it is not possible that any States will receive: ( i ) DoD Component awards using those general terms and conditions; or
( ii ) Subawards from recipients of DoD Component awards using those general terms and conditions.
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 08471

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2File Name Description

08471\08471_ Completeness Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

08471\08471_ HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 08471\08471_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

x 08471\08471_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 08471\08471_PartB.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 08471\08471_PartC.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 08471\08471_PartD.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 08471\08471_PartE.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 08471\08471_PartF.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 08471\08471_PartG.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 08471\08471_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 08471\SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS\08417_Follow Up Questions.doc Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 08471\SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS\08471_A5-2 MAP-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 08471\SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS\08471_A5-3 Water Balance-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x x 08471\SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS\08471_C3-29 Bottom Ash Conversion Option 1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x x 08471\SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS\08471_C3-29 Bottom Ash Conversion Option 2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x x 08471\SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS\08471_C3-29 Bottom Ash Conversion Option 3.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 08471\SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS\08471_D3-1 RET-POND-1 Retired Ash Pond Flow Diagram.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 08471\SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS\08471_D3-1 SPD-1 Ash Pond Flow Diagram.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

08471\SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS\08471_Sect. 2.3 Fly Ash Handling Block Diagram.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

08471\SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS\08471_Sect. 3.3 Bottom Ash Handling Block Diagram.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 08471\SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS\Follow Up Response\08471_Follow Up Email.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 08471\SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS\Follow Up Response\08471_Part C Revised 02.16.2011.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 08471\SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS\Follow Up Response\08471_Part C Revised 2 02.16.2011.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 08471\SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS\Follow Up Response\08471_Part C Revised 3 02.16.2011.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 08471\SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS\Follow Up Response\08471_Part C Revised 4 02.16.2011.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 08471\SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS\Follow Up Response\Part C revised 2-16-11.xls Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

08471\08471_Certification Statement.pdf Plant certification statement

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.
IV 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 58 

Recognizing the holiday of Diwali. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 1, 2005 

Mr. CROWLEY submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Government Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the holiday of Diwali. 

Whereas Diwali is an annual festival celebrated by many 

South Asians and is particularly significant to Hindus, 

Sikhs, and Jains; 

Whereas for nearly 2,000,000 Indian Americans, Diwali is a 

time for thanksgiving and prayer for health, knowledge, 

and peace; 

Whereas Diwali falls on the last day of the last month in the 

lunar calendar and is celebrated as the beginning of the 

New Year by Hindus and Jains; 

Whereas the word ‘‘Diwali’’ is a version of the Sanskrit word 

‘‘Deepavali’’, which means a row of lamps; 

Whereas Diwali is a festival of lights, celebrated in part by 

the lighting and display of small oil lamps throughout the 

home and the community; 
2 

•HRES 58 IH 

Whereas Hindu celebrants of Diwali believe that the rows of 

lamps symbolize the light within the individual that rids 

the soul of the darkness of ignorance; 

Whereas for Hindus, Diwali is a celebration of the return of 

god following the vanquishing of demonic forces; 

Whereas for Sikhs, Diwali is feted as the day on which the 

sixth founding Sikh guru, Guru Hargobind, was released 

from captivity by the Mughal Emperor Jehangir; 

Whereas for Jains, Diwali marks the anniversary of the attainment of Nirvana by Lord Mahavira, the last of the 

Tirthankaras (founders of the Jain philosophy); and 

Whereas Diwali is a celebration of great importance in Indian-American communities throughout the United 

States: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) recognizes the historical and cultural signifi3 cance of Diwali; and 

4 (2) requests that the President issue a procla5 mation recognizing Diwali. 

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 551 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 551

    Supporting the goals and ideals of the International Day of Non-
                               Violence.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 2, 2017

  Ms. Meng (for herself, Ms. Norton, Mr. Evans, Mr. McGovern, and Ms. 
 Judy Chu of California) submitted the following resolution; which was 
      referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
    Supporting the goals and ideals of the International Day of Non-
                               Violence.

Whereas the United Nations General Assembly established the International Day of 
        Non-Violence on June 15, 2007, to disseminate the message of non-
        violence, through means such as education and public awareness;
Whereas, the United Nations General Assembly has stated that ``non-violence, 
        tolerance, full respect for all human rights and fundamental freedoms 
        for all, democracy, development, mutual understanding and respect for 
        diversity are interlinked and mutually reinforcing'';
Whereas the annual International Day of Non-Violence celebration date, October 
        2, was chosen to commemorate the birthday of Mohandas K. Gandhi, more 
        commonly known as ``Mahatma'', which means ``great soul'';
Whereas Mahatma Gandhi was a world-renowned civil rights and spiritual leader, 
        who experienced injustices early in life, and learned to embrace the 
        principles of non-violence as a vehicle for social and political change;
Whereas Mahatma Gandhi was influenced by religious teachings in Hinduism, 
        Jainism, and Christianity in the development of his philosophy;
Whereas Mahatma Gandhi was a major influence for Martin Luther King, Jr., whose 
        emphasis on non-violence is credited with ushering in our Nation's civil 
        rights; and
Whereas people around the world commemorate the International Day of Non-
        Violence by participating in volunteer projects as a way to give back to 
        their communities: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) supports the goals and ideals of the International Day 
        of Non-Violence; and
            (2) encourages the people of the United States to observe 
        the International Day of Non-Violence with appropriate 
        ceremonies, programs, and activities.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                         162,196
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             689
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    473,852
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         513,724
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           524,022
<LOANS>                                      1,745,589
<ALLOWANCE>                                     39,260
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,222,798
<DEPOSITS>                                   1,753,475
<SHORT-TERM>                                   466,354
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            408,870
<LONG-TERM>                                    296,360
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        24,563
<OTHER-SE>                                     273,176
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               3,222,798
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                162,394
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               54,037
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 5,662
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               222,093
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             101,364
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             139,279
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           82,814
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   11,470
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               1,829
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                115,433
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 61,571
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      33,428
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    33,428
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.30<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.29
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.16
<LOANS-NON>                                     18,400
<LOANS-PAST>                                       526
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                23,622
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                41,323
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   19,187
<RECOVERIES>                                     4,754
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               39,260
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
<FN>
<F1>FOR PURPOSES OF THIS EXHIBIT, PRIMARY MEANS BASIC.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

February 24, 2009

d0217

Order 

February 24, 2009

136419

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 136419

COA: 272939 

Wayne CC: 02-013495-01

KEVIN LONELL HARRINGTON,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 20, 2008 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
#### § 76.93 Quality assurance.

The Corporation shall establish, maintain, and execute a quality assurance program satisfying each of the applicable requirements of ASME NQA-1-1989, “Quality Assurance Program Requirements for Nuclear Facilities,” or satisfying acceptable alternatives to the applicable requirements. The Corporation shall execute the criteria in a graded approach to an extent that is commensurate with the importance to safety.
§ 95.11 Specific exemptions. The NRC may, upon application by any interested person or upon its own initiative, grant exemptions from the requirements of the regulations of this part, that are— ( a ) Authorized by law, will not present an undue risk to the public health and safety, and are consistent with the common defense and security; or
( b ) Coincidental with one or more of the following: ( 1 ) An application of the regulation in the particular circumstances conflicts with other rules or requirements of the NRC;
( 2 ) An application of the regulation in the particular circumstances would not serve the underlying purpose of the rule or is not necessary to achieve the underlying purpose of the rule;
( 3 ) When compliance would result in undue hardship or other costs that are significantly in excess of those contemplated when the regulation was adopted, or that are significantly in excess of those incurred by others similarly situated;
( 4 ) When the exemption would result in benefit to the common defense and security that compensates for any decrease in security that may result from the grant of the exemption;
( 5 ) When the exemption would provide only temporary relief from the applicable regulation and the licensee or applicant has made good faith efforts to comply with the regulation;
( 6 ) When there is any other material circumstance not considered when the regulation was adopted for which it would be in the public interest to grant an exemption. If such a condition is relied on exclusively for satisfying paragraph (b) of this section, the exemption may not be granted until the Executive Director for Operations has consulted with the Commission.
[64 FR 15650, Apr. 1, 1999]
H. Res. 632

In the House of Representatives, U.S., 

December 18, 2005.

Resolved, That the requirement of clause 6(a) of rule 

XIII for a two-thirds vote to consider a report from the Committee on Rules on the same day it is presented to the House 

is waived with respect to any resolution reported on the legislative day of Sunday, December 18, 2005. 

Attest:

Clerk.
PGI 217.7504 Acquisition of parts when data is not available.       When acquiring a part for which the Government does not have necessary data with rights to use in a specification or drawing for competitive acquisition, use one of the following procedures in order of preference:          (1) When items of identical design are not required, the acquisition may still be conducted through full and open competition by using a performance specification or other similar technical requirement or purchase description that does not contain data with restricted rights. Two methods are—          (i) Two-step sealed bidding; and          (ii) Brand name or equal purchase descriptions.          (2) When other than full and open competition is authorized under FAR Part 6, acquire the part from the firm that developed or designed the item or process, or its licensees, provided productive capacity and quality are adequate and the price is fair and reasonable.          (3) When additional sources are needed and the procedures in paragraph (1) of this section are not practicable, consider the following alternatives:          (i) Encourage the developer to license others to manufacture the parts;          (ii) Acquire the necessary rights in data;          (iii) Use a leader company acquisition technique (FAR Subpart 17.4) when complex technical equipment is involved and establishing satisfactory additional sources will require technical assistance as well as data; or          (iv) Incorporate a priced option in the contract that allows the Government to require the contractor to establish a second source.          (4) As a last alternative, the contracting activity may develop a design specification for competitive acquisition through reverse engineering. Contracting activities shall not do reverse engineering unless—          (i) Significant cost savings can be demonstrated; and          (ii) The action is authorized by the head of the contracting activity.    **Parent topic:** PGI 217.75 -ACQUISITION OF REPLENISHMENT PARTS