alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the Balance
Sheet at December 31, 1998 and the Statement of Operations for the three months
then ended, as included in this Form 10-QSB, and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                  OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                    DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                              227,777
<SECURITIES>                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                             0
<ALLOWANCES>                                              0
<INVENTORY>                                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    227,777
<PP&E>                                                    0
<DEPRECIATION>                                            0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      227,777
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                 3,500
<BONDS>                                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                              2,814
<OTHER-SE>                                        1,436,745
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        227,777
<SALES>                                                   0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                          0
<CGS>                                                     0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                             0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        108
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   (4,487)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                           0
<INCOME-TAX>                                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                   4,379
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                          4,379
<EPS-BASIC>                                             0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                             0



</TABLE>
#### § 1326.220 What contracts and subcontracts, in addition to those listed in 2 CFR 180.220, are covered transactions?

In addition to the contracts covered under 2 CFR 180.220(b) of the OMB guidance, this part applies to a subcontract that is awarded by a participant in a procurement transaction covered under 2 CFR 180.220(a), if the amount of the subcontract exceeds or is expected to exceed $25,000. This extends the coverage of the Department of Commerce nonprocurement suspension and debarment requirements to one additional tier of contracts under covered nonprocurement transactions, as permitted under the OMB guidance at 2 CFR 180.220(c) (see optional lower tier coverage in the figure in the appendix to 2 CFR part 180).
**Illinois**

**Illinois 07 Henry**
#### § 961.5 Federal agencies.

Federal agencies or departments requiring DOE's disposal services for SNF and/or HLW will be accommodated by a suitable interagency agreement reflecting, as appropriate, the terms and conditions set forth in the contract in § 961.11; *Provided, however,* that the fees to be paid by Federal agencies will be equivalent to the fees that would be paid under the contract.
Exhibit 33.3b

 
260 Interstate North Circle, SE 

Atlanta, GA 30339 

T 770.763-4000 

www.assurant.com 

 

 

January 26, 2022

 

REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH§1122 (d)(2)(vi), §1122(d)(4)(xi) and §1122(d)(4)(xii)of REGULATION AB SERVICING CRITERIAFOR THE REPORTING PERIODJANUARY 1, 2021 TO DECEMBER 31, 2021

American Security Insurance Company, Standard Guaranty Insurance Company and TrackSure Insurance Agency, Inc. (collectively, the “Asserting Party”) is responsible for assessing compliance for the period of January 1, 2021 through December 31, 2021 (the “Reporting Period”) with the servicing criteria set forth in §1122(d)(2)(vi), §1122(d)(4)(xi) and §1122(d)(4)(xii) of Title 17, §229.1122(d) of the Code of Federal Regulations, (the “Applicable Servicing Criteria”) which the Asserting Party has concluded are applicable to the insurance escrow servicing activities it performs with respect to all mortgage backed securities transactions that were registered after January 1, 2006 with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Platform Transactions”). The Asserting Party used the criteria set forth in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB to assess the compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.

The Asserting Party has assessed its compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria for the Reporting Period and has concluded that the Asserting Party has complied, in all material respects, with the Applicable Servicing Criteria for the Reporting Period with respect to the Platform Transaction.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on the assessment of compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of and for the Reporting Period.

American Security Insurance CompanyStandard Guaranty Insurance CompanyTrackSure Insurance Agency, Inc.

 

/s/ Michael Campbell

By: Michael Campbell

President of American Security Insurance Company

And Standard Guaranty Insurance Company, and

Sr. Vice President of TrackSure Insurance Agency, Inc.

Date: January 26, 2022
§ 470.13 Program solicitation. ( a ) The Regional Program Managers shall be responsible for the preparation of program solicitations which solicit proposals for support under the program pursuant to simplified application procedures. Projects may be supported under the program only if they have successfully completed under a program solicitation.
( b ) Each program solicitation shall include— ( 1 ) A description of the program;
( 2 ) The eligibility requirements;
( 3 ) A time schedule for submission of, and action on, proposals;
( 4 ) A simple application form for submitting a proposal for support under the program, together with instructions for completing the application form;
( 5 ) Evaluation criteria, along with a narrative description of their relative importance;
( 6 ) An explanation of the evaluation and selection procedures, including a notice to proposers that if the proposer expressly indicates that only Government evaluation is authorized, DOE may be unable to give full consideration to the proposal.
( 7 ) Other applicable information, terms and conditions, including the desired budget format;
( 8 ) Place for, and manner of, submission;
( 9 ) A unique number for identification purposes;
( 10 ) A statement notifying potential proposers that an announcement does not commit DOE to pay any proposal perparation costs and that DOE reserves the right to select for support any, all, or none of the proposals received in response to a solicitation;
( 11 ) A late proposal provision;
( 12 ) A statement notifying proposers how to identify information in the proposal which the proposer does not want disclosed for purposes other than the evaluation of the proposal.
( 13 ) A statement notifying proposers that all information contained in the proposal will be handled in accordance with the policies and procedures set forth in DOE-AR and DOE-PR, as applicable, and disclosed, if appropriate, in accordance with 10 CFR part 1004 entitled “Freedom of Information.”
( 14 ) A statement notifying proposers of their right to request a debriefing pursuant to the procedures set forth in § 470.18; and
( 15 ) A statement notifying proposers of their right to request a waiver of DOE's title to inventions made under the program.
( c ) Each program solicitation shall be synopsized in the *Commerce Business Daily* prior to or concurrent with release. The program solicitation also shall be announced to appropriate newspapers, trade and technical publications, and State and local governments, and shall be circulated directly to interested individuals, entities, and associations thereof, to the maximum extent feasible.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<CIK> 0000812146
<NAME> ABINGTON BANCORP
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLAR
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          13,599
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                   215
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    162,512
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        345,114
<ALLOWANCE>                                    (2,652)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 546,208
<DEPOSITS>                                     345,838
<SHORT-TERM>                                    28,228
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              4,907
<LONG-TERM>                                    120,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           11,956
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           496
<OTHER-SE>                                      34,303
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 546,208
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 13,181
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                5,604
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    79
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                18,864
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               5,771
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              10,818
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            8,046
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      380
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               1,022
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  7,584
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,537
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       3,537
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,290
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .64
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .60
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.36
<LOANS-NON>                                        744
<LOANS-PAST>                                         6
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 2,280
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      122
<RECOVERIES>                                       114
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                2,652
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,781
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            871
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 131 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
H. Res. 131

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                     February 16, 2017.
    Resolved, That the following named Members be, and are hereby, elected to 
the following standing committees of the House of Representatives:
    Committee on the Budget: Mr. Smith of Missouri, to rank immediately after 
Mr. Johnson of Ohio.
    Committee on Education and the Workforce:  Mr. Russell, to rank immediately 
after Mr. Grothman.
    Committee on Ways and Means: Mr. Bishop of Michigan.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1183 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
H. Res. 1183

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                     December 20, 2018.
    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to take 
from the Speaker's table the bill (H.R. 695) to amend the National Child 
Protection Act of 1993 to establish a voluntary national criminal history 
background check system and criminal history review program for certain 
individuals who, related to their employment, have access to children, the 
elderly, or individuals with disabilities, and for other purposes, with the 
Senate amendment to the House amendment to the Senate amendment thereto, and to 
consider in the House, without intervention of any point of order, a motion 
offered by the chair of the Committee on Appropriations or his designee that the 
House concur in the Senate amendment to the House amendment to the Senate 
amendment with an amendment consisting of the text of Rules Committee Print 115-
88. The Senate amendment and the motion shall be considered as read. The motion 
shall be debatable for one hour equally divided and controlled by the chair and 
ranking minority member of the Committee on Appropriations. The previous 
question shall be considered as ordered on the motion to its adoption without 
intervening motion.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended
      March 31, 2008 (the “Report”) of Patient Safety Technologies, Inc. (the
“Registrant”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
      hereof, I, William B. Horne, as the Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge,
      that:





(1)
      the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)
      the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Registrant.





Dated:
                May 20, 2008
            By:
            /s/
                William B. HorneWilliam
                B. HorneChief
                Financial Officer





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 667 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 667

 Commending hospice care providers such as Hospeace House for allowing 
 people with life-limiting illness or injury to die pain-free and with 
                                dignity.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 1, 2006

  Mr. Kuhl of New York submitted the following resolution; which was 
            referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Commending hospice care providers such as Hospeace House for allowing 
 people with life-limiting illness or injury to die pain-free and with 
                                dignity.

Whereas the number of hospice programs nationwide has grown from one program in 
        1974 to 3,650 programs in 2004 and continues to increase;
Whereas approximately 63 percent of hospice programs, including Hospeace House 
        of Naples, New York, are nonprofit;
Whereas 1,060,000 patients sought hospice care in 2004;
Whereas hospice providers care for patients with diagnoses of cancer, end-stage 
        heart disease, dementia, debility, lung disease, and end-stage kidney 
        disease, among others;
Whereas hospice patients are, in most cases, in need of caring, rather than 
        curing;
Whereas Hospeace House has established a network of nurses, volunteers, clergy, 
        and staff, which enables it to provide the highest level of hospice care 
        possible to its residents; and
Whereas hospice offers a unique mix of medical care, pain management, and 
        emotional and spiritual support to patients as well as their families: 
        Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) recognizes Hospeace House and the rest of the Nation's 
        hospice providers for their contributions in caring for people 
        who have months rather than years to live;
            (2) commends these hospice providers for making patients 
        comfortable, addressing issues that cause patients physical and 
        emotional pain, and supporting their families; and
            (3) encourages hospice providers to maintain their 
        commitment to offering the highest quality of care for patients 
        by establishing community partnerships.
                                 <all>
```
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 February 3, 2016

s0127

Order 

Clerk

February 3, 2016

152138 & (147)

BRUCE WHITMAN,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 152138

COA: 294703

Genesee CC: 08-087993-CL

CITY OF BURTON and CHARLES SMILEY,

Defendants-Appellees.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 9, 2015 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in 

lieu of granting leave to appeal, we VACATE those parts of the Court of Appeals opinion 

holding that a plaintiff’s actions or conduct, as an objective matter, must advance the 

public interest to entitle a plaintiff to the protection of the Whistleblowers’ Protection Act

(WPA), MCL 15.361 et seq. and that the plaintiff here failed to establish sufficient 

evidence of the necessary causal connection between his claimed protected activity and 

the alleged adverse employment action to avoid a judgment notwithstanding the verdict. 

In light of the Court of Appeals’ holding that, pursuant to Wurtz v Beecher Metropolitan 

District, 495 Mich 242 (2014), the plaintiff is not an “employee” placed to bring a claim 

under the WPA, resolution of these other issues was unnecessary. In all other respects, 

leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the remaining questions 

presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion to expedite proceedings is 

DENIED as moot.
§ 709.24 Other information provided to a covered person prior to a polygraph examination. Before administering the polygraph examination, the examiner must: ( a ) Inform the covered person that audio and video recording of each polygraph examination session will be made, and that other observation devices, such as two-way mirrors and observation rooms, also may be employed;
( b ) Explain to the covered person the characteristics and nature of the polygraph instrument and examination;
( c ) Explain to the covered person the physical operation of the instrument and the procedures to be followed during the examination;
( d ) Review with the covered person the relevant questions to be asked during the examination;
( e ) Advise the covered person of the covered person right against self-incrimination; and
( f ) Provide the covered person with a pre-addressed envelope, which may be used to submit a quality assurance questionnaire, comments or complaints concerning the examination.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 13**  **- 4571** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. WILLIAM BARNES , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Greenbelt
. Roger W. Titus , Senior District Judge. ( 8:06

- cr - 00131

- RWT

- 11 )

Submitted : June 19, 2014 Decided: July 7, 2014

Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and THACKER , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
.
Carmen D. Hernandez , Highland, Maryland, for Appellant. Rod J. Rosenstein, United States Attorney, James A. Crowell, IV, Assistant United States Attorney, Jennifer R. Sykes, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Gree nbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: William Barnes appeals the district court’s judgment revoking his supervised release and imposing a nine

- month prison term and a three

- yea r, nine

- month term of supervised release. The only issues Barnes raises on appeal challenge the district court’s decision to impose the nine

- month prison term . Because Barnes’ appeal is moot, we dismiss it. Barnes’ term of supervised release began in March 2013. In April 2013, the probation officer petitioned the district court to revoke Barnes’ supervised release, alleging that he had violated three terms of his supervised release. After a hearing, the district court determined that Barnes had violated those terms. Accordingly, the court revoked Barnes’ supervised release and sentenced him to nine months’ imprisonment and a three

- year, nine

- month term of supervised release. During the pendency of this appeal, Barnes w as released from imprisonment. Accordingly, his arguments challenging the district court’s imposition of the nine

- month prison term are moot. See United States v. Hardy , 545 F.3d 280 , 28 4

- 85 (4th Cir. 2008) ( noting that appellant’s release from prison during pendenc y of appeal mooted challenge to revocation of supervised release and imposition of prison sentence); Friedman’ s, Inc. v. Dunlap , 290 F.3d 191 , 197 (4th Cir. 2002)3 (whether this court is “ presented with a live case or controversy is a question [the court] m ay raise sua sponte since mootness goes to the heart of the Article III jurisdiction of the courts ” (internal quotation marks omitted)). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal as moot.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
§ 501.190 Purpose and scope. ( a ) If a person operates a powerplant covered by any of the prohibitions of titles II, III, or IV of FUA, § 501.191 of this subpart establishes procedures to be followed for the use of minimum amounts of natural gas or petroleum under FUA section 103(a)(15)(B) in order to alleviate or prevent unanticipated equipment outages and emergencies directly affecting the public health, safety, or welfare that would result from electric power outages.
( b ) *Explanatory note:* If a person operates a rental boiler as a powerplant covered by any of the prohibitions of titles II, III, or IV of FUA, he may be able to use the provisions of this subpart for the emergency use of natural gas or petroleum.
[54 FR 52893, Dec. 22, 1989]