alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 745.120 Evaluation and disposition of applications and proposals for research to be conducted or supported by a Federal department or agency. ( a ) The department or agency head will evaluate all applications and proposals involving human subjects submitted to the Federal department or agency through such officers and employees of the Federal department or agency and such experts and consultants as the department or agency head determines to be appropriate. This evaluation will take into consideration the risks to the subjects, the adequacy of protection against these risks, the potential benefits of the research to the subjects and others, and the importance of the knowledge gained or to be gained.
( b ) On the basis of this evaluation, the department or agency head may approve or disapprove the application or proposal, or enter into negotiations to develop an approvable one.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 33 (Friday, February 19, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 7513]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-3238]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

U.S. Customs and Border Protection


Accreditation of Dixie Services, Inc., as a Commercial Laboratory

AGENCY: U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland 
Security.

ACTION: Notice of accreditation of Dixie Services, Inc., as a 
commercial laboratory.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to 19 CFR 151.12, Dixie 
Services, Inc., 1706 First Street, Galena Park, TX 77547, has been 
accredited to test petroleum and petroleum products for customs 
purposes, in accordance with the provisions of 19 CFR 151.12. Anyone 
wishing to employ this entity to conduct laboratory analyses should 
request and receive written assurances from the entity that it is 
accredited by the U.S. Customs and Border Protection to conduct the 
specific test requested. Alternatively, inquiries regarding the 
specific test this entity is accredited to perform may be directed to 
the U.S. Customs and Border Protection by calling (202) 344-1060. The 
inquiry may also be sent to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#0a69687a24666b68627b4a6e6279246d657c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="7f1c1d0f51131e1d170e3f1b170c51181009">[email protected]</span></a>. Please reference the 
website listed below for a complete listing of CBP approved gaugers and 
accredited laboratories. http://cbp.gov/xp/cgov/import/operations_support/labs_scientific_svcs/commercial_gaugers/.

DATES: The accreditation of Dixie Services, Inc., as commercial 
laboratory became effective on September 3, 2009. The next triennial 
inspection date will be scheduled for September 2012.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Anthony Malana, Laboratories and 
Scientific Services, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, 1300 
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Suite 1500N, Washington, DC 20229, 202-344-
1060.

    Dated: February 4, 2010.
Ira S. Reese,
Executive Director, Laboratories and Scientific Services.
[FR Doc. 2010-3238 Filed 2-18-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-14-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 4.10





Exhibit 4.10




PARK NATIONAL CORPORATION

50 North Third Street

Post Office Box 3500

Newark, Ohio 43058-3500

(740) 349-8451

www.parknationalcorp.com




February 24, 2010




United States Securities and Exchange Commission

100 F Street, N.E.

Washington, D.C. 20549





	 	 Re:	 	 Park National Corporation

Commission File Number: 1-13006

Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year

Ended December 31, 2009





Ladies and Gentlemen:



Park National Corporation, an Ohio corporation (“Park”), is today filing with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Park for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2009 (“Park’s 2009 Form 10-K”).



Neither (i) Park nor (ii) any of Park’s consolidated subsidiaries has outstanding any
instrument or agreement with respect to its long-term debt under which the total amount of
long-term debt authorized exceeds 10% of the total assets of Park and Park’s subsidiaries on a
consolidated basis. In accordance with the provisions of Item 601(b)(4)(iii) of SEC Regulation
S-K, Park hereby agrees to furnish to the SEC, upon request, a copy of each instrument or agreement
defining (i) the rights of holders of long-term debt of Park or (ii) the rights of holders of
long-term debt of a consolidated subsidiary of Park, in each case which is not being filed or
incorporated by reference as an exhibit to Park’s 2009 Form 10-K.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	Very truly yours,



PARK NATIONAL CORPORATION

 	 
	 	/s/ John W. Kozak
 	 
	 	John W. Kozak 	 
	 	Chief Financial Officer
§ 708.20 Review by the Secretary of Energy of a decision on appeal of a dismissal. ( a ) By the 30th day after receiving a decision on an appeal under § 708.19 from the OHA Director, any party may file a petition for Secretarial review of a dismissal with the Office of Hearings and Appeals. A decision by the OHA Director to reverse a dismissal may not be the subject of a petition for Secretarial review.
( b ) By the 15th day after filing the petition for Secretarial review, the petitioning party must file a statement setting forth the arguments in support of its position. A copy of the statement must be served on the other parties, who may file a response by the 20th day after receipt of the statement. Any response must also be served on the other parties.
( c ) All submissions permitted under this section must be filed with the Office of Hearings and Appeals.
( d ) The Secretary (or his designee) will reverse or revise an appeal decision by the OHA Director only under extraordinary circumstances. Upon consideration of the petition for Secretarial review, the Secretary will direct the OHA Director to issue an order either upholding the dismissal by the Head of Field Element or EC Director or ordering further processing of the complaint. If the dismissal is upheld, this is a final agency action.
#### PIXLEY, Appellant, v. COMMERCIAL TRAVELERS’ MUTUAL ACCIDENT ASS’N OF AMERICA, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

November 25, 1914.)

Action by Ella A. Pixley against the Travelers’ Mutual Accident Association of America.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.

KRUSE, P. J., and LAMBERT, J., dissent, upon the ground that the evidence presented questions of fact for the jury.
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of BNP Residential Properties, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Philip
S. Payne, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.







  /s/ Philip S. Payne

Philip S. Payne
Chairman, Treasurer and
Chief Financial Officer


May 7, 2004






                                       26
<PAGE>
§ 835.1202 Accountable sealed radioactive sources. ( a ) Each accountable sealed radioactive source shall be inventoried at intervals not to exceed six months. This inventory shall: ( 1 ) Establish the physical location of each accountable sealed radioactive source;
( 2 ) Verify the presence and adequacy of associated postings and labels; and
( 3 ) Establish the adequacy of storage locations, containers, and devices.
( b ) Except for sealed radioactive sources consisting solely of gaseous radioactive material or tritium, each accountable sealed radioactive source shall be subject to a source leak test upon receipt, when damage is suspected, and at intervals not to exceed six months. Source leak tests shall be capable of detecting radioactive material leakage equal to or exceeding 0.005 μCi.
( c ) Notwithstanding the requirements of paragraph (b) of this section, an accountable sealed radioactive source is not subject to periodic source leak testing if that source has been removed from service. Such sources shall be stored in a controlled location, subject to periodic inventory as required by paragraph (a) of this section, and subject to source leak testing prior to being returned to service.
( d ) Notwithstanding the requirements of paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section, an accountable sealed radioactive source is not subject to periodic inventory and source leak testing if that source is located in an area that is unsafe for human entry or otherwise inaccessible.
( e ) An accountable sealed radioactive source found to be leaking radioactive material shall be controlled in a manner that minimizes the spread of radioactive contamination.
[63 FR 59686, Nov. 4, 1998, as amended at 72 FR 31927, June 8, 2007]
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Henriette B. Roman, Appellant. Martin P. Catherwood, as Industrial Commissioner, Respondent.

Memorandum by the Court. Appeal by the claimant from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed July 18, 1968, which adopted the opinion and decision of a Referee sustaining an initial determination of the respondent disqualifying the claimant from benefits upon the ground that she voluntarily left her employment without good cause. The board affirmed the Referee’s finding that the credible evidence in the record established that the claimant was not discharged, but left her employment voluntarily and without good cause, and further affirmed the finding that driving the manager in her automobile was not a burden sufficient to establish good cause for voluntary leaving. The office manager had been employed since May 26, 1966. The Referee’s finding that LEe claimant had driven the manager “ over a number of years ” is technically incorrect, but it has no crucial effect upon the finding as such. Decision affirmed, without costs. Herlihy, P. J., Reynolds, Staley, Jr., Greenblott and Cooke, JJ., concur in memorandum by the court.
§ 54.4 Scope. ( a ) Plant systems, structures, and components within the scope of this part are— ( 1 ) Safety-related systems, structures, and components which are those relied upon to remain functional during and following design-basis events (as defined in 10 CFR 50.49 (b)(1)) to ensure the following functions— ( i ) The integrity of the reactor coolant pressure boundary;
( ii ) The capability to shut down the reactor and maintain it in a safe shutdown condition; or
( iii ) The capability to prevent or mitigate the consequences of accidents which could result in potential offsite exposures comparable to those referred to in § 50.34(a)(1), § 50.67(b)(2), or § 100.11 of this chapter, as applicable.
( 2 ) All nonsafety-related systems, structures, and components whose failure could prevent satisfactory accomplishment of any of the functions identified in paragraphs (a)(1) (i), (ii), or (iii) of this section.
( 3 ) All systems, structures, and components relied on in safety analyses or plant evaluations to perform a function that demonstrates compliance with the Commission's regulations for fire protection (10 CFR 50.48), environmental qualification (10 CFR 50.49), pressurized thermal shock (10 CFR 50.61), anticipated transients without scram (10 CFR 50.62), and station blackout (10 CFR 50.63).
( b ) The intended functions that these systems, structures, and components must be shown to fulfill in § 54.21 are those functions that are the bases for including them within the scope of license renewal as specified in paragraphs (a) (1)-(3) of this section.
[60 FR 22491, May 8, 1995, as amended at 61 FR 65175, Dec. 11, 1996; 64 FR 72002, Dec. 23, 1999]
#### § 600.170 Purpose.

Sections 600.171 through 600.173 contain closeout procedures and other procedures for subsequent disallowances and adjustments.
Editorial Note on Part 72
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 72 appear at 80 FR 74981, Dec. 1, 2015, and at 81 FR 86910, Dec. 2, 2016.

§ 72.52 Creditor regulations. ( a ) This section does not apply to an ISFSI or MRS constructed and operated by DOE.
( b ) Pursuant to section 184 of the Act, the Commission consents, without individual application, to the creation of any mortgage, pledge, or other lien on special nuclear material contained in spent fuel not owned by the United States that is the subject of a license or on any interest in special nuclear material in spent fuel; Provided: ( 1 ) That the rights of any creditor so secured may be exercised only in compliance with and subject to the same requirements and restrictions as would apply to the licensee pursuant to the provisions of the license, the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, and regulations issued by the Commission pursuant to said Act; and
( 2 ) That no creditor so secured may take possession of the spent fuel and/or reactor-related GTCC waste under the provisions of this section before— ( i ) The Commission issues a license authorizing possession; or
( ii ) The license is transferred.
( c ) Any creditor so secured may apply for transfer of the license covering spent fuel and/or reactor-related GTCC waste by filing an application for transfer of the license under § 72.50(b). The Commission will act upon the application under § 72.50(c).
( d ) Nothing contained in this regulation shall be deemed to affect the means of acquiring, or the priority of, any tax lien or other lien provided by law.
( e ) As used in this section, “creditor” includes, without implied limitation— ( 1 ) The trustee under any mortgage, pledge, or lien on spent fuel and/or reactor-related GTCC waste in storage made to secure any creditor;
( 2 ) Any trustee or receiver of spent fuel and/or reactor-related GTCC waste appointed by a court of competent jurisdiction in any action brought for the benefit of any creditor secured by a mortgage, pledge, or lien;
( 3 ) Any purchaser of the spent fuel and/or reactor-related GTCC waste at the sale thereof upon foreclosure of the mortgage, pledge, or lien or upon exercise of any power of sale contained therein; or
( 4 ) Any assignee of any such purchaser.
[53 FR 31658, Aug. 19, 1988, as amended at 66 FR 51840, Oct. 11, 2001]
H. Res. 702

In the House of Representatives, U.S., 

March 2, 2006.

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule 

XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the 

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of 

the bill (H.R. 4167) to amend the Federal Food, Drug, and 

Cosmetic Act to provide for uniform food safety warning notification requirements, and for other purposes. The first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. All points of order 

against consideration of the bill are waived. General debate 

shall be confined to the bill and shall not exceed one hour 

equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking 

minority member of the Committee on Energy and Commerce. After general debate the Committee of the Whole shall 

rise without motion. No further consideration of the bill shall 
2

•HRES 702 EH 

be in order except pursuant to a subsequent order of the 

House.

Attest: 

Clerk.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
         THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S  UNAUDITED  CONSOLIDATED  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE THREE MONTHS
ENDED  SEPTEMBER  28, 1996 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                          0001000371
<NAME>                                         Herff Jones, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-28-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-28-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1.000
<CASH>                                         643
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  39,018
<ALLOWANCES>                                   3,304
<INVENTORY>                                    41,127
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               93,694
<PP&E>                                         89,408
<DEPRECIATION>                                 40,095
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 148,370
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          87,734
<BONDS>                                        162,928
<COMMON>                                       5,728
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (110,348)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   148,370
<SALES>                                        46,656
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               46,656
<CGS>                                          30,122
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  30,122
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               24,499
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             4,977
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (12,937)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   4,593
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (8,344)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (8,344)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (4.48)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (4.48)
        


</TABLE>
#### § 435.6 Life-cycle costing.

Each Federal agency shall determine life-cycle cost-effectiveness by using the procedures set out in subpart A of 10 CFR part 436. A Federal agency may choose to use any of four methods, including lower life-cycle costs, positive net savings, savings-to-investment ratio that is estimated to be greater than one, and an adjusted internal rate of return that is estimated to be greater than the discount rate as listed in OMB Circular Number A-94 “Guidelines and Discount Rates for Benefit-Cost Analysis of Federal Programs.”

[71 FR 70283, Dec. 4, 2006, redesignated at 79 FR 61571, Oct. 14, 2014]
#### § 612.1 Purpose.

This part implements section 40323(g)(2) of the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (Pub. L. 117-58), codified at 42 U.S.C. 18753(g)(2), to set forth the procedure to recapture credits awarded pursuant to the civil nuclear credit program.
#### § 603.865 March-in rights.

A TIA's patent rights provision should include the Bayh-Dole march-in rights set out in paragraph (j) of the Patent Rights (Small Business Firms and Nonprofit Organization) provision in Appendix A to subpart D of 10 CFR 600, or an equivalent clause, concerning actions that the Government may take to obtain the right to use subject inventions, if the recipient fails to take effective steps to achieve practical application of the subject inventions within a reasonable time. The march-in provision may be modified to best meet the needs of the program. However, only infrequently should the march-in provision be entirely removed (*e.g.*, if a recipient is providing most of the funding for a RD&D project, with the Government providing a much smaller share).
Case 2:06-cv-00778-MEF-WC Document 7 Filed 09/12/2006 Page 1 of 1
#### KELLEY et al., Respondents, v. GERE COAL CO. et al., Appellants.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

May 27, 1914.)

Action by Daniel A. Kelley and others against the Gere Coal Company and others.

No opinion. Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.
IV 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 41 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that a day should 

be established as ‘‘National Tartan Day’’ to recognize the outstanding 

achievements and contributions made by Scottish-Americans to the 

United States. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 25, 2005 

Mr. MCINTYRE (for himself and Mr. DUNCAN) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Government Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that 

a day should be established as ‘‘National Tartan Day’’ 

to recognize the outstanding achievements and contributions made by Scottish-Americans to the United States. 

Whereas April 6 has a special significance for all Americans, 

and especially those Americans of Scottish descent, because the Declaration of Arbroath, the Scottish Declaration of Independence, was signed on April 6, 1320, and 

the American Declaration of Independence was modeled 

in part on that inspirational document; 

Whereas this resolution honors the major role that ScottishAmericans played in the founding of the Nation, such as 

the fact that almost half of the signers of the Declaration 

of Independence were of Scottish descent, the Governors 
2 

•HRES 41 IH 

in 9 of the original 13 States were of Scottish ancestry, 

and Scottish-Americans successfully helped shape the Nation in its formative years and guide it through its most 

troubled times; 

Whereas this resolution recognizes the monumental achievements and invaluable contributions made by ScottishAmericans that have led to America’s preeminence in the 

fields of science, technology, medicine, government, politics, economics, architecture, literature, media, and visual 

and performing arts; 

Whereas this resolution commends the more than 200 organizations throughout the United States that honor Scottish 

heritage, tradition, and culture, representing the hundreds of thousands of Americans of Scottish descent, residing in every State, who already have made the observance of Tartan Day on April 6 a success; and 

Whereas these numerous individuals, clans, societies, clubs, 

and fraternal organizations do not let the great contributions of the Scottish people go unnoticed: Now, therefore, 

be it 

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that a day should be established as ‘‘National 

3 Tartan Day’’ to recognize the outstanding achievements 

4 and contributions made by Scottish-Americans to the 

5 United States. 

Æ