alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 99.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

 

Each ofthe undersigned  hereby certifies, inhis capacity as an officer of Archon Corporation (the “Company”), for purposesof 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:

 

•                                          the Quarterly Report of theCompany on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2002 fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and

 

•                                          the information contained insuch report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditionand results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| February  13, 2003                                                                   |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                 |
| /s/  PAUL W. LOWDEN                                                                  |   |
| Paul  W. Lowden                                                                      |
| *Chairman of the Board and President  (Principal Executive Officer)*                 |
|                                                                                 |
|                                                                                 |
| /s/  CHARLES W. SANDEFUR                                                             |   |
| Charles  W. Sandefur                                                                 |
| *Director and Chief Financial Officer  (Principal Accounting and Financial Officer)* |

 

29

----
In The Matter Of: 

SERVED: March 26, 2013 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC ''''! 1-1 

Li i 

Docket No . .F AA-2012-0781 

BRAILLE BATTERY, INC. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No. 2011 SO 700298 

Respondent 

NOTICE OF PRE-HEARING STATUS CONFERENCE 

On November 2, 2012, an Order Setting Litigation Dates and Procedures was filed. 

On February 13, 2013, a Notice of Withdrawal as Counsel for Braille Battery, Inc. was 

filed. This Notice instructed that future communications be directed to Respondent's CEO, 

acting as its lay representative. 

YOU ARE HEREBY NOTICED: 

1. Pursuant to 14 C.P.R.§ 13.205(a)(l), a pre-hearing status conference will be held 

Thursday, Aprilll, 2013, at 11:00 a.m. Eastern time. The Office of Hearings will 

provide the parties a call-in number and passcode prior to the pre-hearing status 

conference. 

2. The purpose of the pre-hearing status .conference will be to assess the progress of the 

proceeding, make any necessary .changes to the litigation schedule, and address any 

motions, issues, or concerns of the parties. · 

Attachment: Service List 
FDMS No. FAA-2012-0781 

. (Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST- BY U.S. MAIL 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W~ 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1 0001 

Mr. ,Gerald A. Ellis, Esq. 

Complainant's Counsel 

Office of the Regional Counsel, AS0-7 

Southern Region 

Federal Aviation Administration 

P.O. Box 20636 

Atlanta, GA 30320 

TEL: 404-305-5200 

FAX: 404-305-5223 

Mr. Blake Fuller, CEO 

Respondent's Representative 

Braille Battery, Inc., Respondent 

6935 15th Street E, Building 115 

Sarasota, FL 34243 

blake@braillebattery.com 

TEL: 941-312-5047 

Judge J. E. Sullivan 

US. Administrative Law Judge 

ONE COPY 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Office of Hearings, M-20/Room E11-310 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2132 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

1 Service was by u.s. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building,..-Suite 2W1000, Washington, DC 

20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Balance
Sheet, Statement of Operations, Statements of Cash Flows and Notes thereto
incorporated in Part I, Item 1 of this Form 10-Q and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         210,927
<SECURITIES>                                   435,105
<RECEIVABLES>                                   43,948
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               690,601
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,002,190
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           10,088
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,649
<OTHER-SE>                                     987,227
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,002,190
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 8,786
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   12,181
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                12,897
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (16,292)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,078
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (23,370)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (23,370)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
H. Res. 742

In the House of Representatives, U.S., 

March 30, 2006.

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule 

XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the 

Whole House on the state of the Union for further consideration of the bill (H.R. 609) to amend and extend the Higher 

Education Act of 1965. No further general debate shall be 

in order. Notwithstanding clause 11 of rule XVIII, no further 

amendment shall be in order except those printed in the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution. 

Each such amendment may be offered only in the order 

printed in the report, may be offered only by a Member designated in the report, shall be considered as read, shall be debatable for the time specified in the report equally divided 

and controlled by the proponent and an opponent, shall not 

be subject to amendment, and shall not be subject to a demand for division of the question in the House or in the 

Committee of the Whole. All points of order against such 

amendments are waived. At the conclusion of consideration of 
2

•HRES 742 EH 

the bill for amendment the Committee shall rise and report 

the bill to the House with such amendments as may have 

been adopted. Any Member may demand a separate vote in 

the House on any amendment adopted in the Committee of 

the Whole to the bill or to the amendment in the nature of 

a substitute made in order as original text. The previous 

question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and 

amendments thereto to final passage without intervening motion except one motion to recommit with or without instructions.

Attest: 

Clerk.
§ 709.14 Consequences of a refusal to complete a CI evaluation including a polygraph examination. ( a ) If a covered person is an applicant for employment or assignment or a potential detailee or assignee with regard to an identified position and the covered person refuses to complete a CI evaluation including a polygraph examination required by this part as an initial condition of access, DOE and its contractors must refuse to employ, assign, or detail that covered person with regard to the identified position.
( b ) If a covered person is an incumbent employee in an identified position subject to a CI evaluation including a polygraph examination under § 709.3(b), (c), or (d), and the covered person refuses to complete a CI evaluation, DOE and its contractors must deny that covered person access to classified information and materials protected under § 709.3(b) and (c) and may take other actions consistent with the denial of access, including administrative review of access authorization under 10 CFR part 710. If the covered person is a DOE employee, DOE may reassign or realign the DOE employee's duties, or take other action, consistent with that denial of access and applicable personnel regulations.
( c ) If a DOE employee refuses to take a CI polygraph examination, DOE may not record the fact of that refusal in the employee's personnel file.
§ 835.1301 General provisions. ( a ) A general employee whose occupational dose has exceeded the numerical value of any of the limits specified in § 835.202 as a result of an authorized emergency exposure may be permitted to return to work in radiological areas during the current year providing that all of the following conditions are met: ( 1 ) Approval is first obtained from the contractor management and the Head of the responsible DOE field organization;
( 2 ) The individual receives counseling from radiological protection and medical personnel regarding the consequences of receiving additional occupational exposure during the year; and
( 3 ) The affected employee agrees to return to radiological work.
( b ) All doses exceeding the limits specified in § 835.202 shall be recorded in the affected individual's occupational dose record.
( c ) When the conditions under which a dose was received in excess of the limits specified in § 835.202, except those received in accordance with § 835.204, have been eliminated, operating management shall notify the Head of the responsible DOE field organization.
( d ) Operations which have been suspended as a result of a dose in excess of the limits specified in § 835.202, except those received in accordance with § 835.204, may be resumed only with the approval of DOE.
[58 FR 65485, Dec. 14, 1993, as amended at 63 FR 59687, Nov. 4, 1998; 72 FR 31927, June 8, 2007]
#### § 603.1240 Cooperative agreement.

A legal instrument which, consistent with 31 U.S.C. 6305, is used to enter into the same kind of relationship as a grant (see definition of “grant,” in § 603.1270), except that substantial involvement is expected between the DOE and the recipient when carrying out the activity contemplated by the cooperative agreement. The term does not include “cooperative research and development agreements” as defined in 15 U.S.C. 3710a.
§ 1108.210 Foreign public entity. *Foreign public entity* means: ( a ) A foreign government or foreign governmental entity;
( b ) A public international organization, which is an organization entitled to enjoy privileges, exemptions, and immunities as an international organization under the International Organizations Immunities Act (22 U.S.C. 288-288f);
( c ) An entity owned (in whole or in part) or controlled by a foreign government; or
( d ) Any other entity consisting wholly or partially of one or more foreign governments or foreign governmental entities.
ex10-61.htm


    Exhibit 10.61

    
      
        

      



    Summary of Compensation for
Non-Employee Directors

    Effective
January 1, 2010

    


     

    


     

    
      	 Annual Board
      Retainer	
               $  50,000

               

            
	 Board Meeting
      Fee	
               $    1,500
      per meeting attended

               

            
	 Committee
      Chair Annual Retainer Audit/Compensation	
               $  15,000

               

            
	 Committee
      Chair Annual Retainer Other
      Committees	
               $  10,000

               

            
	 Committee
      Meeting Fee	
               $    1,500
      per meeting attended

               

            
	 Annual Equity
      Grant (1)	 $125,000


    

     

     

    
      	
              (1)

            	
              Granted
      in the form Restricted Stock Units effective January 26,
      2010.  Messrs. Bech, Dossey, Lee, Loyd, Rose and Myers each
      received 9,630 Restricted Stock Units which will vest in full on December
      31, 2010.
§ 603.810 Method and frequency of payment requests. The procedure and frequency for payment requests depend upon the payment method, as follows: ( a ) For either reimbursements or advance payments, the TIA must allow recipients to submit requests for payment at least monthly. The contracting officer may authorize the recipients to use the forms or formats described in 10 CFR 600.312(d).
( b ) If the payments are based on payable milestones, the recipient will submit a report or other evidence of accomplishment to the program official at the completion of each predetermined activity. If the award is an expenditure-based TIA that includes minimum cost sharing percentages for milestones (see 10 CFR 603.570(c)), the recipient must certify in the report that the minimum cost sharing requirement has been met. The contracting officer may approve payment to the recipient after receiving validation from the program manager that the milestone was successfully reached.
PUBLIC LAW 109–421—DEC. 20, 2006 120 STAT. 2889

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 854:

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 109–557 (Comm. on Resources).

SENATE REPORTS: No. 109–342 (Comm. on Indian Affairs).

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 152 (2006):

July 24, considered and passed House.

Dec. 6, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 109–421

109th Congress

An Act

To provide for certain lands to be held in trust for the Utu Utu Gwaitu Paiute

Tribe.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LANDS TO BE HELD IN TRUST.

(a) IN GENERAL.—Subject to valid existing rights, all right,

title, and interest of the United States in and to the lands, including

improvements and appurtenances, described in subsection (b) are

hereby declared to be held in trust by the United States for the

benefit of the Utu Utu Gwaitu Paiute Tribe, Benton Paiute Reservation.

(b) LAND DESCRIPTION.—The lands to be held in trust pursuant

to subsection (a) are the approximately 240 acres described as

follows: Mount Diablo Base and Meridian, Township 2 South, Range

31 East Section 11: SE1⁄4 and E1⁄2 of SW1⁄4.

(c) GAMING RESTRICTION.—Lands taken into trust pursuant

to subsection (a) shall not be considered to have been taken into

trust for, and shall not be eligible for, class II gaming or class

III gaming (as those terms are used in the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (25 U.S.C. 2701 et seq.)).

Approved December 20, 2006.

Dec. 20, 2006

[H.R. 854]
#### Alan Schachter, Respondent, v. Doctors Hospital, Appellant.

Judgment entered October 3, 1969, in plaintiff’s favor unanimously reversed on the law, the facts and in the exercise of discretion, and a new trial ordered, with $50 costs and disbursements to abide the event. The plaintiff’s private physician and surgeon testified that he had not ordered that bedrails or sideboards be placed on the plaintiff’s bed since he did not consider them necessary. In the face of this testimony, the trial court, although acknowledging that there was no express claim that the hospital should have supplied bedrails on the plaintiff’s bed, committed reversible error in charging the jury that *“*you are free from all the evidence in the ease to infer whether the hospital as a reasonable prudent hospital should have had bedrails on patients’ beds and what effect, if any, the bedrails would have had on the accident.” The decision as to whether bedrails should be installed on a patient’s bed is a medical act. Inasmuch as the plaintiff’s physician did not order and in fact saw no need that rails be placed on the plaintiff’s bed, the defendant-appellant hospital may not be cast in liability because of their absence. *(Grace*v. *Manhattan Eye, Ear é Throat liosp.,*276 App. Div. 955, affd. 301 N. Y. 660; *Pinar*v. *Manhattan Gen.,*279 App. Div. 552; 27 N. Y. Jur., Hospitals and Asylums, § 79; 31 ALR 2d 1128, 1131.) Reversible error was committed too in permitting the plaintiff to testify that he had not received any moneys in a prior action against a third party for his original knee injury. Mention was made in that action of his fall out of the bed at the defendant-appellant’s hospital. Unquestionably, the plaintiff’s testimony as to the outcome of the previous trial contributed to the return of an obviously excessive award. The general jury verdict of $125,000 may not stand in any event since it may have been based upon the erroneous theory that the hospital was negligent in not providing bedrails on *761the plaintiff’s bed. *(fHamilton*v. *Presbyterian Hosp. of City of N. Y.,*25 A D 2d 563, app. dsmd. 17 N Y 2d 719.) Concur — Eager, J. P., McGivern, Steuer and Tilzer, JJ.; Nunez, J., concurs in result.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM                        .                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

Postal Service notice of filing of a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3).

# DATES:

December 27, 2010.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Elizabeth A. Reed, 202-268-3179.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that on December 16, 2010, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *Request of the United States Postal Service to Add Priority Mail Contract 32 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *http://www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2011-11, CP2011-47.                

Neva R. Watson,

Attorney, Legislative.

[FR Doc. 2010-32374 Filed 12-23-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
### 23000 Sussex Hwy. #226 Seaford, DE 19973 855

- 973

- 6476

August	26,	2015

U.S.	Department	of	Transportation Docket	Management	System 1200	New	Jersey	Avenue,	SE Washington,	DC	20590

RE:	Exemption	No.	11237	(FAA

- 2014

- 0591)	Utility	Aerial	Services,	Inc.

This	letter	is	a request for	amendment	to	the	existing	Section	333	Exemption	No.	11237	to add	additional	aircraft	to	the	exemption	holders	authorized	commercial	operations.		On March	26,	2014,	the	FAA	granted	this	Petition	for	Exemption	to	conduct	commercial operations	using	smal l	unmanned	aircraft	systems.		Utility	Aerial	Services,	Inc.	now	seeks	an amendment	to	its	exemption	authorizing	the	operation	of	the	DJI	S

- 1000	and	the	Ascending Technologies	As c Tec Falcon	8. The	FAA	has	previously	granted	operations	of	t he	As c Tec	Falcon 8 under	(exemptions 11208,	11268)	and	the	DJI	S

- 1000	(exemptions	11728,	12106). The	addition	of	these	aircraft	will	enhance	Utility	Aerial	Services	operational	capabilities without	any	change	to	the	safe	conduct	of	operations.

In	addition	we	request	that the	point	of	contact	be	changed	to	the	following	for	all

communications	and	notifications.

Utility	Aerial	Services,	Inc.

Attn:	William	R.	Alex 23000	Sussex	Highway,	#	226 Seaford,	DE		19973

855

- 973

- 6476

wral ex@utilityaerial.com

Thank	you	for	your	prompt	attention	to	this	request	for	amendment.		Please	do	not	hesitate to	contact	me	if	you	should	have	any	questions.

Regards,

William	R.	Alex President/CEO Utility	Aerial	Services,	Inc.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED DECEMBER
28,  1996 AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY  BY  REFERENCE  TO SUCH  FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                      0001000371
<NAME>                                     Herff Jones, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                               1,000
<CURRENCY>                                 U.S. Dollars
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-28-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-28-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                            1.000
<CASH>                                     2,638
<SECURITIES>                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                              40,168
<ALLOWANCES>                               2,841
<INVENTORY>                                44,585
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           100,571
<PP&E>                                     90,602
<DEPRECIATION>                             41,741
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             154,554
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      92,025
<BONDS>                                    160,278
<COMMON>                                   5,728
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      0
<PREFERRED>                                0
<OTHER-SE>                                 (105,415)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               154,554
<SALES>                                    114,944
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           114,944
<CGS>                                      64,073
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              64,073
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           51,756
<LOSS-PROVISION>                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         10,104
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (10,989)
<INCOME-TAX>                               3,901
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (7,088)
<DISCONTINUED>                             0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            0
<CHANGES>                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                               (7,088)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                              (3.66)
<EPS-DILUTED>                              (3.66)
                                
                                

</TABLE>