(logo) Crowe Horwath

 

**Crowe Horwath LLP**

Independent Member CroweHorwath International

 

 

REPORT OF INDEPENDENTREGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

The Board of Directors 

NS Servicing II, LLC 

New York, New York

 

We have examined management'sassertion, included in the accompanying Management's Report on Assessment ofCompliance with Regulation AB Criteria that NS Servicing II, LLC (the Company)complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of theSecurities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB, as of December 31,2016 and for the period January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2016 (the"Reporting Period") for the commercial mortgage-backed securitytransactions or commercial mortgage loans included in a commercialmortgage-backed security or other securitization transaction, for which theCompany is named as a special servicer and is required to comply withRegulation AB (the “Platform”) except for servicing criteria1122(d)(1)(iii), 1122(d)(2)(ii), 1122(d)(3)(ii-iv), 1122(d)(4)(ii),1122(d)(4)(v), and 1122(d)(4)(ix-xv), for which the Company has determined arenot applicable to the activities performed with respect to the Platform. Withrespect to applicable servicing criterion 1122(d)(2)(iii) and 1122(d)(4)(iii),the Company has determined that there were no activities performed during theyear ended December 31, 2016 with respect to the Platform, because there wereno occurrences of events that would require the Company to perform suchactivities. The Company has determined that servicing criteria 1122(d)(3)(i) isapplicable to the activities the Company performs with respect to the Platformonly as it relates to the Company’s obligation to report to thecertificate administrator or other parties in accordance with the transactionagreement. Appendix A to Management’s Report on Assessment of Compliancewith Regulation AB Criteria identifies the individual transactions defined bymanagement as constituting the Platform. Management is responsible for theCompany’s compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Ourresponsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion based on ourexamination.

 

Our examination was conductedin accordance with attestation standards of the Public Company AccountingOversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a testbasis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the applicableservicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considerednecessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of selectedasset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing ofselected servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whetherthe Company processed those selected transactions and performed those servicingactivities in compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our procedureswere limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed bythe Company during the period covered by the report. Our procedures were notdesigned to detect noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurredprior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances oramounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by thisreport. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for ouropinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on theCompany’s compliance with the applicable servicing criteria.

 

As described in theaccompanying Management’s Report on Assessment of Compliance withRegulation AB Criteria, for servicing criteria 1122(d)(4)(vi) and 1122(d)(4)(vii),the Company has engaged various vendors to perform the activities required bythese servicing criteria. The Company has determined that these vendors are notconsidered “servicers” as defined in Item 1101(j) of Regulation AB,and the Company has elected to take responsibility for assessing compliancewith the servicing criteria applicable to each vendor as permitted by Section200.06 of the Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations for Regulation ABpublished by the Division of Corporation Finance (“C&DIs Section200.06”). As permitted by C&DIs Section 200.06, the Company hasasserted that it has policies and procedures in place designed to providereasonable assurance that the vendors’ activities comply in all materialrespects with the servicing criteria applicable to each vendor. The Company issolely responsible for determining that it meets the SEC requirements to applyC&DIs Section 200.06 for the vendors and related criteria as described inits assertion, and we performed no procedures with respect to theCompany’s determination of its eligibility to use C&DIs Section200.06.

 

In our opinion,management’s assertion that the Company complied with the aforementionedapplicable servicing criteria as of December 31, 2016 and for the periodJanuary 1, 2016 December 31, 2016 for the Platform is fairly stated, in allmaterial respects.

 

 

/s/ Crowe Horwath LLP

Crowe Horwath LLP

 

Fort Lauderdale, Florida 

March 10, 2017