alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 606 

Congratulating the University of Maryland Terrapins men’s soccer team, 

the 2005 National Collegiate Athletic Association Champions. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 14, 2005 

Mr. HOYER (for himself, Mr. CARDIN, Mr. GILCHREST, Mr. BARTLETT of 

Maryland, Mr. WYNN, Mr. CUMMINGS, Mr. RUPPERSBERGER, and Mr. 

VAN HOLLEN) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 

the Committee on Education and the Workforce 

RESOLUTION 

Congratulating the University of Maryland Terrapins men’s 

soccer team, the 2005 National Collegiate Athletic Association Champions. 

Whereas the Maryland Terrapins claimed the 2005 NCAA 

Championship, 1–0, over the University of New Mexico 

Lobos at SAS Complex in Cary, North Carolina, on December 11, 2005; 

Whereas the Maryland Terrapins are the 2005 Atlantic Coast 

Conference Regular Season Champions; 

Whereas the Maryland Terrapins, in their 2005 season, had 

an overall record of 19–4–2, and set a school record of 

66 goals; 
2 

•HRES 606 IH 

Whereas the Maryland Terrapins have amassed 76 wins over 

the past four seasons, the most in the NCAA during the 

four-year span; 

Whereas the Maryland Terrapins won their first national soccer title in 1968, when it shared the title with Michigan 

State; 

Whereas the Maryland Terrapins are the first team since 

1992 to win the tournament as the number one seed; 

Whereas Jason Garey was named the tournament’s offensive 

Most Valuable Player and Chris Seitz was named the defensive Most Valuable Player; and 

Whereas the 2005 NCAA Championship Soccer team members are Spencer Allen, Matt Beckman, Kenney Bertz, 

Marc Burch, Robbie C’deBaca, Kwame Darko, A.J. 

Delagarza, Michael Dello-Russo, Maurice Edu, Jason 

Garey, David Glaudemans, A.J. Godbolt, Aki Kadotani, 

Stephen King, Chris Lancos, Michael Marchiano, Kevin 

Reiman, Doug Rodkey, Robbie Rogers, Craig Salvati, 

Chris Seitz, Kevin Tangney, Michael Vallie, Pat Wilson, 

and Graham Zusi: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives con2 gratulates the University of Maryland Terrapins men’s 

3 soccer team and Coaches Sasho Cirovsky, Russell Payne, 

4 and Rob Vartughian on an outstanding championship sea5 son, a season that sets the Terrapins among the elite in 

6 collegiate soccer. 

Æ
**REGULATORY EVALUATION**

**Directorate Identifier:** 2011

- NM

- 251

- AD

**Executive Order 12866:** Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:** Is the AD significant? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Regulatory Flexibility Act:** Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:** This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. I s it appropriate t o include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? YES ( ) explain NO (X)
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

October 31, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice 131451 & (39) Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices

v SC: 131451 COA: 258575 Oakland CC: 2004-196178-FH; JAN-JAMES BUCHANAN, 2004-196899-FH Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 27, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion to remand is DENIED.

t1023 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 31, 2006

Clerk
#### Ruth Petker, as Administratrix of the Estate of Aaron Petker, Deceased, Respondent, v Richard Hornstein, Appellant.

Appeal from order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on September 6, 1979, unanimously dismissed as academic, without costs and without disbursements, and resettled order of said court entered on May 20, 1980, unanimously affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. No opinion. Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Birns, Fein, Lupiano and Carro, JJ.
§ 780.41 Contents of application. In addition to the information specified in § 780.5, each application shall contain the following: ( a ) The applicant's contention, with supporting data, that the invention or discovery covered by the patent is of primary importance in the production or utilization of special nuclear material or atomic energy;
( b ) The applicant's contention, with supporting data, that the licensing of such invention or discovery is of primary importance to the conduct of the activities of the applicant, including information concerning: ( 1 ) The activities in the production or utilization of special nuclear material or atomic energy to which applicant proposes to apply the license;
( 2 ) The nature and purpose of the applicant's intended use of the patent license; and
( 3 ) The relationship of the invention or discovery to the activities to which it is to be applied, including an estimate of the effect of such activities stemming from the grant or denial of the license.
( c ) The applicant's contention, with supporting data, that the activities to which the patent license are proposed to be applied are of primary importance to the furtherance of policies and purposes of the Act;
( d ) The applicant's contention, with supporting data, that such applicant cannot otherwise obtain a patent license from the owner of the patent on terms which are reasonable for the applicant's intended use of the patent, including information concerning: ( 1 ) Efforts made by applicant to obtain a patent license from the owner of the patent; and
( 2 ) Terms, if any, on which the owner of the patent proposed to grant applicant a patent license.
( e ) The terms the applicant proposes as reasonable for the patent license; and
( f ) A copy of any license, permit, or lease obtained by the applicant under the procedures outlined in section 153(c) of the Act.
#### § 1400.137 Who in the Department of the Interior may grant an exception to let an excluded person participate in a covered transaction?

Within the Department of the Interior, the Director, Office of Acquisition and Property Management has the authority to grant an exception to let an excluded person participate in a covered transaction, as provided in the OMB guidance at 2 CFR 180.135.
Exhibit 4.2


    Exhibit
      4.2

    


    


    Form
      of
      3.95% Convertible Senior Note due 2026 (attached as Exhibit A to the First
      Supplemental Indenture filed as Exhibit 4.1 hereto and incorporated by reference
      thereto).
ICRAS 1472 1845-0108 v2 – Affected Public - Individuals 8/28/2013

This request is for an extension of the current approval of the policies and procedures for 

determining satisfactory academic progress (SAP) as required in Section 484 of the Higher 

Education Act of 1965, as amended (HEA). 

These regulations identify the policies and procedures to ensure that students are making 

satisfactory academic progress in their program at a pace and a level to receive or continue to 

receive Title IV, HEA program funds. If there is lapse in progress, the policy must identify how 

the student will be notified and what steps are available to a student not making satisfactory 

academic progress toward the completion of their program, and under what conditions a student 

who is not making satisfactory academic progress may continue to receive Title IV, HEA 

program funds.

Section 668.34(c) – Institutions that evaluate satisfactory academic progress at the end of each 

payment period.

This section of the regulations identifies the process that is followed for institutions that 

evaluate a student’s SAP at the end of a payment period. This section specifies that an 

institution’s policy may provide for disbursement of Title IV aid to a student not meeting SAP 

under certain circumstances. This includes policies that automatically place a student who is not 

meeting SAP on “financial aid warning” a newly defined term.

# of Respondents # of Responses Hrs/Response Burden Hours

Individuals not meeting SAP requirements

809,537 x 2= 1,619,074 X .17 275,243

Section 668.34(d) – Institutions that evaluate satisfactory academic progress annually or less 

frequently than at the end of each payment period.

This section of the regulations identifies the process that is followed for institutions that 

evaluate a student’s SAP on an annual basis. This section specifies that an institution’s policy

may provide for disbursement of Title IV aid to a student not meeting SAP under certain 

circumstances. This includes policies that require a student to file an appeal and either having a 

determination made by the school that the student should meet SAP standards after the 

subsequent payment period or if the school develops, with the student, an academic plan which if 

successfully completed will ensure the student meets the institution’s SAP standards at a specific 

time.

# of Respondents # of Responses Hrs/Response Burden Hours

Individuals not meeting SAP requirements

662,348 662,348 X .17 112,599

TOTALS

Responses 2,281,422

Respondents 1,471,885

Burden Hours 387,842
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 169 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 169

Congratulating the New England Patriots on their victory in Super Bowl 
                                  LI.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 2, 2017

 Mr. Neal (for himself, Mr. Kennedy, Ms. Pingree, Mr. Welch, Ms. Clark 
of Massachusetts, Mr. Larson of Connecticut, Mr. Poliquin, Mr. Keating, 
Mr. Courtney, Mr. Lynch, Ms. Kuster of New Hampshire, Ms. DeLauro, Mr. 
Moulton, Ms. Shea-Porter, Mr. McGovern, Mr. Cicilline, Mr. Capuano, Ms. 
  Esty, and Mr. Himes) submitted the following resolution; which was 
      referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Congratulating the New England Patriots on their victory in Super Bowl 
                                  LI.

Whereas on Sunday, February 5, 2017, the New England Patriots won Super Bowl LI 
        by a score of 34 to 28, defeating the Atlanta Falcons in Houston, Texas;
Whereas the Patriots overcame the largest deficit in Super Bowl history, scoring 
        25 points in the second half;
Whereas the Patriots' victory in Super Bowl LI earned the team's historic fifth 
        Super Bowl victory in 15 years;
Whereas Tom Brady, who many in New England refer to as ``The GOAT'', broke 
        multiple Super Bowl records leading the Patriots to victory in the first 
        Super Bowl overtime and was named the Super Bowl Most Valuable Player 
        for a record fourth time;
Whereas Bill Belichick won a recordbreaking fifth Super Bowl title as a head 
        coach;
Whereas James White had an outstanding performance, scoring an impressive 3 
        touchdowns, and completing a 2-point conversion;
Whereas the performance of the defense, especially Dont'a Hightower, Alan 
        Branch, and Trey Flowers in the second half was critical to the 
        Patriots' victory in Super Bowl LI, effectively shutting out the Atlanta 
        Falcons for the final 23 minutes and 36 seconds of regulation;
Whereas Julian Edelman, with exceptional skill and determination, performed a 
        spectacular catch to continue a fourth quarter drive by the Patriots, 
        helping to send the game to overtime;
Whereas Robert Kraft, the owner of the New England Patriots, stated, ``I want to 
        say to our fans, brilliant coaching staff and players who are so 
        spectacular, this is unequivocally the sweetest. I'm proud to say for 
        the fifth time, we are all Patriots.''; and
Whereas the Patriots ``did their job'' for the fifth time, delivering the 
        Lombardi Trophy to New England once again: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives congratulates the New 
England Patriots on their remarkable victory in Super Bowl LI.
                                 <all>
```
(logo) pwc

 

 

**Report of IndependentRegistered Public Accounting Firm**

 

To the Board of Directors, PNCFinancial Services Group, Inc.:

 

We have examinedmanagement’s assertion, included in the accompanying Report on Assessmentof Compliance with Regulation AB Servicing Criteria, that Midland LoanServices, a division of PNC Bank, National Association (“Midland”or the “Company”) complied with the servicing criteria set forth inItem 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for alltransactions serviced on the *Enterprise!* Loan Management System (the“Platform”), as of December 31, 2016 and for the year then ended,excluding criteria 1122(d)(1)(iii), 1122(d)(3)(i)(B), 1122(d)(3)(i)(C),1122(d)(3)(i)(D), 1122(d)(3)(ii), 1122(d)(3)(iii), 1122(d)(3)(iv), and1122(d)(4)(xv), which the Company has determined are not applicable to the servicingactivities performed by it with respect to the Platform. Management isresponsible for the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria. Ourresponsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion based on ourexamination.

 

Our examination was conductedin accordance with attestation standards of the Public Company AccountingOversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a testbasis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the applicableservicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considerednecessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of selectedasset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing ofselected servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whetherthe Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selectedactivities in compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our procedureswere limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed bythe Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were notdesigned to detect noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurredprior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances oramounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by thisreport. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for ouropinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on theCompany’s compliance with the servicing criteria.

 

In our opinion,management’s assertion that Midland complied with the aforementionedapplicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016for the Platform is fairly stated, in all material respects.

 

 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

 

February 17, 2017

 

 

*PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP,1100 Walnut Street, Suite 1300, Kansas City, MO 64106*

*T: (816) 472 7921, F: (816)218 1890 www.pwc.com/us*

* *
Editorial Note on Part 2
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

§ 2.902 Definitions. As used in this subpart: ( a ) *Government agency* means any executive department, commission, independent establishment, corporation, wholly or partly owned by the United States of America, which is an instrumentality of the United States, or any board, bureau, division, service, office, officer, authority, administration, or other establishment in the executive branch of the Government.
( b ) *Interested party* means a party having an interest in the issue or issues to which particular Restricted Data or National Security Information is relevant. Normally the interest of a party in an issue may be determined by examination of the notice of hearing, the answers and replies.
( c ) The phrase *introduced into a proceeding* refers to the introduction or incorporation of testimony or documentary matter into any part of the official record of a proceeding subject to this part.
( d ) *National Security Information* means information that has been classified pursuant to Executive Order 12356.
( e ) *Party,* in the case of proceedings subject to this subpart includes a person admitted as a party under § 2.309 or an interested State admitted under § 2.315(c).
[41 FR 53329, Dec. 6, 1976, as amended at 47 FR 56314, Dec. 16, 1982; 69 FR 2264, Jan. 14, 2004]
**Exhibit 31.2**
**Section 302 Certification**
I, Lee A. Whatcott, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Westcorp; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand have;
 a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter inthe case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s boardof directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial data; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.     Date: May 6, 2004      By /S/ LEE A. WHATCOTT       Lee A. Whatcott   Executive Vice President,   Chief Financial Officer and   Chief Operating Officer (Principal Financial and   Accounting Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-27-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-25-1998
<CASH>                                           4,414
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   41,156
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,835
<INVENTORY>                                     71,439
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               128,091
<PP&E>                                          66,062
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,460
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 208,419
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          214,355
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           223
<OTHER-SE>                                    (23,994)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   208,419
<SALES>                                         55,085
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                55,085
<CGS>                                           44,924
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   14,366
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,018
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,773
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (9,996)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (9,996)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (9,996)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.46)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.46)
        

</TABLE>
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Commercial Mortgage  Servicing**D1050-084, 8th Floor  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|--------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

Reference is hereby made tothat certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of March 1, 2013, by andamong DEUTSCHE MORTGAGE & ASSET RECEIVING CORPORATION, as Depositor, WELLSFARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, WELLS FARGO BANK,NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Special Servicer, U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, asTrustee, and DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS, as CertificateAdministrator, Paying Agent and Custodian, and PARK BRIDGE LENDER SERVICES LLCas Operating Advisor with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-ThroughCertificates, Series COMM 2013-CCRE6 (the "Agreement"). Capitalizedterms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in theAgreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 10.11 ofthis Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of CommercialMortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1. A review of the activitiesof the Master Servicer during the period from January 1, 2016 through December31, 2016 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance per theAgreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and

 

2. To the best of myknowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of itsobligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, theundersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2017.

 

 

/s/ Daniel Bober

Daniel Bober

Executive Vice President 

Wells Fargo Bank

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll  go far |
|------------------------|-------------------------------------|