alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Benny L. Colona et al., Respondents, v Frederick Norwood et al., Appellants. (Action No. 1.) (And a Second Action.)

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated February 15,1980, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint (in Action No. 1), upon the ground that no triable issue of fact is presented by the plaintiffs as to the existence of serious injury within the meaning of subdivision 4 of section 671 of the Insurance Law. Order reversed, on the law, with $50 costs and disbursements, motion granted and complaint dismissed. The injured plaintiff alleges that the lumbosacral strain which he sustained in the accident of March 24, 1978 constituted “permanent'eonsequential limitation of use of a body, organ or member,’ or at least, a'significant limitation of the use of bodily *[sic]*junction or system,’ or at the very least,‘a medically determined injury or impairment of a non-permanent nature which prevents the injured person from performing substantially *all*of the material acts which constitute such persons usual and customary daily activities for not less than 90 *[sic]*days during the 180 *[sic]*days immediately following the occurrence of the injury or impairment,’ ” within the meaning of subdivision 4 of section 671 of the Insurance Law. These allegations are unsubstantiated conclusory assertions not supported by any medical proof and fail to establish a genuine issue of fact. The medical report of the injured plaintiff’s treating physician, dated October 28,1978, submitted by the defendants on this motion, in which the physician stated that “the patient recovered completely from his injury and was discharged on June 5, 1978”, stands wholly unrefuted. (See *Simone v Streeben,*56 AD2d 237; *Jackson v Decatur,*83 Misc 2d 295; *Weaver v Ware,*89 Misc 2d 710.) Titone, J. P., Gibbons, Margett and O’Connor, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 633 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 633

Honoring Helen Sewell on the occasion of her retirement from the House 
 of Representatives and expressing the gratitude of the House for her 
                         many years of service.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 17, 2005

 Mr. Weldon of Pennsylvania submitted the following resolution; which 
         was referred to the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Honoring Helen Sewell on the occasion of her retirement from the House 
 of Representatives and expressing the gratitude of the House for her 
                         many years of service.

Whereas Helen Sewell, the proprietor of the concession stand in the Republican 
        Cloak Room of the House of Representatives, through her long and devoted 
        service to the House and its Members, has become a House institution in 
        the minds and hearts of House Members;
Whereas Helen Sewell has worked at the counter in the Cloak Room since she was a 
        teenager in the 1930's;
Whereas Helen Sewell's service to the House of Representatives is a continuation 
        of a family tradition, as her father began working in the Cloak Room 87 
        years ago;
Whereas Helen Sewell, as a result of her almost seven decades of service, has 
        been present for some of the defining events in the Nation's history and 
        the House's history, including the attack by Puerto Rican nationalists 
        on March 1, 1954;
Whereas Helen Sewell has established personal relationships with many of the 
        20th century's most important Americans, including Presidents Ford, 
        Nixon, and George H.W. Bush;
Whereas Helen Sewell's dedication to her work, and her careful attention to 
        Members of the House, has provided both nourishment and friendship to 
        Members of the House since the days of the Great Depression;
Whereas Helen Sewell has demonstrated extraordinary strength and endurance by 
        working long and difficult hours past her 80th year;
Whereas Helen Sewell received the 1983 John W. McCormick Award of Excellence for 
        her service to the Congress;
Whereas all who have served as Members in the United States House of 
        Representatives, and who have had occasion to meet Helen Sewell, believe 
        that her service to the House is a matter of historical importance and 
        should be commemorated; and
Whereas Helen Sewell will retire officially from the House of Representatives on 
        December 31, 2005: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives honors Helen Sewell on 
the occasion of her retirement and expresses its gratitude for her many 
years of service.
                                 <all>
```
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-19-00306-CR

The State of Texas

v.

Rosie Rangel

On Appeal from the

347th District Court of Nueces County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 17FC-1805H

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed. The Court orders the appeal 

DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

October 31, 2019
§ 850.29 Protective clothing and equipment. ( a ) The responsible employer must provide protective clothing and equipment to beryllium workers and ensure its appropriate use and maintenance, where dispersible forms of beryllium may contact worker's skin, enter openings in workers' skin, or contact workers' eyes, including where: ( 1 ) Exposure monitoring has established that airborne concentrations of beryllium are at or above the action level;
( 2 ) Surface contamination levels measured or presumed prior to initiating work are above the level prescribed in § 850.30;
( 3 ) Surface contamination levels results obtained to confirm housekeeping efforts are above the level prescribed in § 850.30; and
( 4 ) Any beryllium-associated worker who requests the use of protective clothing and equipment for protection against airborne beryllium, regardless of measured exposure levels.
( b ) The responsible employer must comply with 29 CFR 1910.132, Personal Protective Equipment General Requirements, when workers use personal protective clothing and equipment.
( c ) The responsible employer must establish procedures for donning, doffing, handling, and storing protective clothing and equipment that: ( 1 ) Prevent beryllium workers from exiting areas that contain beryllium with contamination on their bodies or their personal clothing; and
( 2 ) Include beryllium workers exchanging their personal clothing for full-body protective clothing and footwear before they begin work in regulated areas.
( d ) The responsible employer must ensure that no worker removes beryllium-contaminated protective clothing and equipment from areas that contain beryllium, except for workers authorized to launder, clean, maintain, or dispose of the clothing and equipment.
( e ) The responsible employer must prohibit the removal of beryllium from protective clothing and equipment by blowing, shaking, or other means that may disperse beryllium into the air.
( f ) The responsible employer must ensure that protective clothing and equipment is cleaned, laundered, repaired, or replaced as needed to maintain effectiveness. The responsible employer must: ( 1 ) Ensure that beryllium-contaminated protective clothing and equipment, when removed for laundering, cleaning, maintenance, or disposal, is placed in containers that prevent the dispersion of beryllium dust and that are labeled in accordance with § 850.38 of this part; and
( 2 ) Inform organizations that launder or clean DOE beryllium-contaminated protective clothing or equipment that exposure to beryllium is potentially harmful, and that clothing and equipment should be laundered or cleaned in a manner prescribed by the responsible employer to prevent the release of airborne beryllium.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Roger Whitfield, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from (1) a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County, rendered September 23, 1968, convicting him of murder in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence, and (2) two orders of said court, (a) one entered January 28, *1969,*which denied his *coram nobis*proceeding to vacate said judgment, and (b) the other entered November 14, 1969, which denied his motion for a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence. (The notices of appeal from the orders erroneously refer to the dates of the orders as December 31, 1968 and September 29, 1969, respectively.) The appeal from the judgment brings up for review another order of said court, entered November 28, 1967, which denied defendant’s motion to suppress certain evidence, without a hearing. Orders entered January 28, 1969 and November 14,1969 affirmed. No opinion. Order entered November 28, 1967 reversed, on the law, and defendant’s motion to suppress evidence remitted to the County Court for a hearing and new determination. The appeal from the judgment will be held in abeyance pending such hearing and new determination. In our opinion, defendant’s uncontradicted allegation that evidence procured by an illegal search and seizure of his automobile by the police was to be used against him in a criminal proceeding' was sufficient to require a hearing (Code Crim. Pro., § 813-c; cf. *People v. McCoy,*27 A D 2d 858, affd. 21 N Y 2d 730; *People v. Manguso,*24 A D 2d 539). Christ, Acting P. J., Martuscello, Brennan and Benjamin, JJ., concur; (Beldock, P. J., deceased).
§ 1128.705 Content of FMS Article VII. ( a ) *Requirement.* A DoD Component's general terms and conditions must address the kinds of income included as program income, the way or ways in which a recipient may use it, the duration of the recipient's accountability for it, and related matters.
( b ) *Award terms and conditions.* A DoD Component's general terms and conditions must include as FMS Article VII the wording appendix G to this part provides, unless, as authorized by §§ 1128.710 through 1128.725, there are revisions to the wording of Sections A and E of the article or Section D is reserved.
#### § 1108.30 Advance payment.

*Advance payment* means a payment that DoD or a recipient or subrecipient makes by any appropriate payment mechanism, including a predetermined payment schedule, before the recipient or subrecipient disburses the funds for project or program purposes.
IV 

House Calendar No. 142 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 653 

[Report No. 109–366] 

Relating to consideration of the bill (S. 1932) to provide for reconciliation 

pursuant to section 202(a) of the concurrent resolution on the budget 

for fiscal year 2006 (H. Con. Res. 95). 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 31, 2006 

Mr. PUTNAM, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; 

which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

RESOLUTION 

Relating to consideration of the bill (S. 1932) to provide 

for reconciliation pursuant to section 202(a) of the concurrent resolution on the budget for fiscal year 2006 

(H. Con. Res. 95). 

1 Resolved, That the House hereby concurs in the Sen2 ate amendment to the House amendment to the bill (S. 

3 1932) to provide for reconciliation pursuant to section 

4 202(a) of the concurrent resolution on the budget for fis5 cal year 2006 (H. Con. Res. 95). 
House Calendar No. 142 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 653 

[Report No. 109–366] 

RESOLUTION 

Relating to consideration of the bill (S. 1932) to 

for fiscal year 2006 (H. Con. Res. 95). 202(a) of the concurrent resolution on the budget provide for reconciliation pursuant to section 

JANUARY 31, 2006 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed
# L_2014229EN.01001201.xml

| 31.7.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 229/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.7.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 229/12

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 30 July 2014

appointing a Belgian member of the European Economic and Social Committee

(2014/511/EU)

(2014/511/EU)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 302 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal of the Belgian Government,

Having regard to the opinion of the European Commission,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 13 September 2010 the Council adopted Decision 2010/570/EU, Euratom appointing the members of the European Economic and Social Committee for the period from 21 September 2010 to 20 September 2015 (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 13 September 2010 the Council adopted Decision 2010/570/EU, Euratom appointing the members of the European Economic and Social Committee for the period from 21 September 2010 to 20 September 2015 (1).

1

| (2) | A member's seaton the European Economic and Social Committee has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Mr Claude ROLIN, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

A member's seaton the European Economic and Social Committee has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Mr Claude ROLIN,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Mr Raymond COUMONT is hereby appointed as a member of the European Economic and Social Committee for the remainder of the current term of office, which runs until 20 September 2015.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 30 July 2014.

For the Council

The President

S. GOZI

---

(1)  OJ L 251, 25.9.2010, p. 8.

1

---
§ 170.210 Requirements for notices of funding opportunities, regulations, and application instructions. ( a ) Each Federal awarding agency that makes awards of Federal financial assistance subject to the Transparency Act must include the requirements described in paragraph (b) of this section in each notice of funding opportunity, regulation, or other issuance containing instructions for applicants under which Federal awards may be made that are subject to Transparency Act reporting requirements, and is issued on or after the effective date of this part.
( b ) The notice of funding opportunity, regulation, or other issuance must require each non-Federal entity that applies for Federal financial assistance and that does not have an exception under § 170.110(b) to have the necessary processes and systems in place to comply with the reporting requirements should they receive Federal funding.
[85 FR 49526, Aug. 13, 2020]
1 The Honorable William R. Wilson, United St ates District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 08-1736

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the v. * Eastern District of Arkansas. * Christopher Levell McFadden, * [PUBLISHED] * Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: April 21, 2008 Filed: May 1, 2008

___________ Before WOLLMAN, HANSEN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Christopher McFadden appeals from the district court’s 1 order denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursu ant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) based on Amendment 706 to the United States Sent encing Guidelines Manual (USSG), which reduced the base offense leve ls in USSG § 2D1.1(c) ba sed on the quantity of cocaine base (crack).-2- McFadden pleaded guilty to conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute more than 50 grams of a mixture containing co caine base and to using a communication facility to distribute cocaine base. He was sentenced to 108 months’ imprisonment. Although McFadden’s original drug quan tity-driven sentencing range was 188 to 235 months’ imprisonment, he faced a 108-month statutory maximum (five-year maximum on the conspiracy charge, see 18 U.S.C. § 371, and a four-year maximum on the use of communication facility, see21 U.S.C. § 843(b)(d)), which became his guidelines sentencing range, see USSG § 5G1.1(a) (“Where the statutorily authorized maximum sentence is less than the minimum of the applicable guideline range, the statutorily authorized maximum senten ce shall be the guideline sentence.”).
A two-level decrease base d on drug quantity would re sult in a sentencing range of 151 to 188 months’ imprisonment, with the result that McFadden’s newly calculated guideline range would still be limited by USSG § 5G1.1(a) and would remain unchanged at 108 months. McFadden is thus not entitled to a reduction under Amendment 706. See USSG § 1B1.10(a)(2)(B) (“A re duction in the defendant’s term of imprisonment . . . is not authorized under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) if–[a]n amendment listed in subsection (c) does not have the effect of lowering the defendant’s applicable guideline range.”). The district court’s judgment denying McFadden any relief pursuant to the retroactive amendments is summarily affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47A(a).

______________________________
HECI0.1AI AlgPOXT 

APPENDIX C: LETTERS OF SUPPORT 

JEFF 5f5SrCiNS 

Bnitci] ^tarcs pcnarr 

'.VASHIMTIOW. OC CiSIOO'O'l 

<\ill!n;:l 2'\ i'.Uti 

Hi; Koiiorahk' Kriv Liillui:'! 

SKKi.iry 

L*!> Uqi:'.i1n«:i!l iil"l'rjrtir'."i".nii'r'il 

IJO!) NVvV Jcisvy Avc-mu'. SI: 

Wii-iliiiiKi li.C. 2Q?-70 

Dili: Sivmiaiv l.iill^riil: 

c:? 

3 

t 

> 

_p 

rs3 

^ ^ o 

-2^ m-M Nm 

T OF 

[ATION 

RATION 

CO 

I aiB tirjiiw '.oi-xprca ir/-' unr.wi 5i:|'|ii5ji ofOit: ijiniiiinjpliciiiirMi .-;ii5>ii!ii;c-il l«y ilic IX'ihrji 

Kci'.croi Aiipon tu llic LiS l)i:|«iiimLT.i .>rTi.iiiSii.>ii:!rui;i ^t'>^ll'lr^l^l^.ll Ci-inii-.uiiiiy Air Scivicv 

Ijf.v.'opinciii l'rl'i;i:iir.. 

Tliii fiiiiiliiiu. ir.'i'.raiiitj, wmild cii:il.'lr ilie l>v>lli;iii Uiijjitnir;! A'.ipi'it ••• iiStrici rilVurdii^sIc, 

Ci>nvi:t;i:iii nii' 5!:r. :cc fur IIIL" cuiiiriiuiiiiy \i> foiiw buiincss :>;;<] (;i:)ii.iiiy ^ii.;\i'ili A key c.-siv.pnuciii ii> 

tMiil:lim: :i NIIIIH:; ;IIH! vibir.ni '.•coiioniy isc-jnipciiuvs airi<;rviix- ;ill>'>\»'iiii; iVn- atvrL'iS ;•> ilii" l;k*h;il 

iii;ii'l:ci(il.icf. Tl-.f prcicticc 'jTsin ucdilion;il :iii K-'.IT'IC; v.oiilil inlil ilic; clc-tiiuiii -M"i:c-ir.|'i.'liii-:>n riiul hrfoiiij 

iiavL-1 tiiiijaimnilii.-s lo S'jull'.r.isi Al:'.l';ir.>.'i citanti'.miticL';. liiiicruini; ilic c^iiic stiic. Wiih 'j s;iK-!c 

•.•oriincre'al ai; c;inicr, iOniliL-i^i ALili.ini.t iiiivclcrr pay -oiiic orih'.- lis^h-.-jj oirfarvi in ihe counir>'. 

siV'iMi'.t ii;ily It* liiyii>L:i1i. CiilllViiT.iii. 

The r>Dlhiii! ciul liiiU'tpris;; nnsi; :iii;sir;iii;!j!'.: Ito.'iiifuis f<.<i IUISIULSS, with r.'isy avOi^iS vln 

liifjIrvO)"? scrv'iny ilic rvv;ii.in, ii inilil \''i;ilci i-liiuMi'.:, fmil n iiTniic-il wciifv i'c-ioc u-jtli (iis;-faic Cviucaiiwi.il 

tir.liii;iif'i« fniil !i p.'ivUUiirA'Sj ii \ lirui'iuie. Ii is iilso il"^ ii.'iiifniril '"I \i»cic <-i Army Aviriunn" wiih iiioic 

ili.sn S.iiilO;nirn;i!y sml civilinns smploy""^ ^' I'L "uOtw. iJiillifiii'-': divcisil'icj CL-oisfisiiyliiclndci 

rii::iintii.'ii:ijii.c)!c;U;b-Kiri: :ind stcial icniccs. i"<Ii:v;iiK>n;irtilpislilis; ::!liniti!s!;:i]i>ju tiKHKinSitiv.si liiciop 

\ii<i-iliii'4li ol' l:idii5iry giivjps. l-vcii iit ihc miii.m -.-U'liiiiriy, '.his .'iitri hi.". iiirrtiiUtiiini liiw niifUiployiMcni 

:irtd a pcrsisicm iriimiilcofuiuivili. '111-.- |)ic.^i:i«'.Tfi.'mipfiii!venir.5LT\iccivi;uld yo c loiiir ivuy.o 

suppnn ihc-c pnyijiiij: clTo>i!: 

L^pwi review>;riiii>{;s:iiii appUt.-ii[iin, I am lir^pcAil you ••vill agree iluiii il l!;i3 imnii njKiv; wviiiliv 

c:' lumiir.si. ThdciVrc. I icn:i-" yy-if full cfiiisulcmiioi! nniJ im-aii n lavoriblc ii:>piinM; If I f.i" !ini»n ;iiiy 

quc3lioas o; pruviili; inrvJici' inrorniaufiri. pi'.asr ilo iiui hfsiini;? u> i'Oiii;ic< inc. 

\'i;iy inily jxmrs'. 

United Siiiti's i!Cii:r.ai 

J5:r.T. 

^ 1 v'4v^ lr:3iA c i nn r 

:i:!i.T'i: ; 

11 C.T.; t* M llzJl^Ui 

tsuiLiiiSi}:) 

L'OMI-

^ t j ttr,. _iri a ^-M - lii>i 

r.-.^. <_..-ciil 

Dothan Regional Airport, Dothan, Alabama 

Small Community Air Sen/ice Development Program Proposal 2010 

41
H. Res. 725

In the House of Representatives, U.S., 

March 15, 2006.

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule 

XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the 

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of 

the bill (H.R. 4939) making emergency supplemental appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2006, and 

for other purposes. The first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. All points of order against consideration of the 

bill are waived. General debate shall be confined to the bill 

and shall not exceed one hour equally divided and controlled 

by the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on Appropriations. After general debate the bill shall 

be considered for amendment under the five-minute rule. 

When the reading for amendment reaches title II, such title 

shall be considered as read. During consideration of the bill 

for amendment, the Chairman of the Committee of the Whole 

may accord priority in recognition on the basis of whether the 

Member offering an amendment has caused it to be printed 
2

•HRES 725 EH 

in the portion of the Congressional Record designated for 

that purpose in clause 8 of rule XVIII. Amendments so printed shall be considered as read. When the committee rises and 

reports the bill back to the House with a recommendation 

that the bill do pass, the previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to final 

passage without intervening motion except one motion to recommit with or without instructions.

Attest: 

Clerk.
§ 603.670 Flow down audit requirements to subrecipients. ( a ) In accordance with § 603.610, an expenditure-based TIA must require participants to flow down the same audit requirements to a subrecipient that would apply if the subrecipient were a participant.
( b ) For example, a for-profit participant that is audited by the DCAA: ( 1 ) Would flow down to a university subrecipient the Single Audit Act requirements that apply to a university participant;
( 2 ) Could enter into a subaward allowing a for-profit participant, under the circumstances described in § 603.650(a), to use an IPA to do its audits.
( c ) This policy applies to subawards for substantive performance of portions of the RD&D project supported by the TIA, and not to participants' purchases of goods or services needed to carry out the RD&D.
H. Res. 1181 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

December 20, 2018. 

Resolved, That the requirement of clause 6(a) of rule 

XIII for a two-thirds vote to consider a report from the Committee on Rules on the same day it is presented to the House 

is waived with respect to any resolution reported through the 

legislative day of December 24, 2018. 

SEC. 2. It shall be in order at any time through the calendar day of December 23, 2018, for the Speaker to entertain motions that the House suspend the rules as though 

under clause 1 of rule XV. The Speaker or his designee shall 

consult with the Minority Leader or her designee on the designation of any matter for consideration pursuant to this section. 

Attest: 

Clerk.