alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### International Trade Administration

# AGENCY:

Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Shauna Biby, Senior Import Policy Analyst, Office of Policy, Import Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-4267.

## Correction and Clarification

                        On December 16, 2010, the Department of Commerce published in the Federal Register the following notice:                         *Proposed Methodology for Respondent Selection in Antidumping Proceedings; Request for Comment,*75 FR 78678 (Dec. 16, 2010) (                        *Respondent Selection Notice*). After the publication of the                         *Respondent Selection Notice,*                         we identified an inadvertent error in this notice. Specifically, we inadvertently listed the deadline to file comments as both 30 days and 45 days following publication. The correct deadline for filing comments is 45 days after publication (                        *i.e.,*                         January 30, 2011). Because this date falls on a weekend, the deadline for filing comments is January 31, 2011.                    

Dated: December 17, 2010.

Ronald K. Lorentzen,

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.

[FR Doc. 2010-32342 Filed 12-22-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
H. Res. 736

In the House of Representatives, U.S., 

March 29, 2006.

Whereas the United States, at great cost in blood and treasure, helped the people of Afghanistan liberate themselves 

from the tyranny of the Taliban and adopt free institutions and practices, including respect for rule of law and 

internationally recognized human rights; 

Whereas the preamble of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan affirms that the people of Afghanistan are ‘‘for creation of a civil society free of oppression, 

atrocity, discrimination, and violence and based on the 

rule of law, social justice, protection of human rights, 

and dignity, and ensuring the fundamental rights and 

freedoms of the people’’; 

Whereas Article 7 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic 

of Afghanistan provides that ‘‘the state shall observe the 

United Nations Charter, inter-state agreements, as well 

as international treaties to which Afghanistan has joined, 

and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights,’’ which 

includes the right to freedom of thought, conscience, and 

religion and the freedom to change one’s religion or belief; 

Whereas Article 18 of the International Covenant on Civil 

and Political Rights, to which Afghanistan has acceded, 

provides that ‘‘[e]veryone shall have the right to freedom 
2

•HRES 736 EH 

of thought, conscience and religion . . . [t]his right shall 

include freedom to have or to adopt a religion or belief 

of his choice, and freedom, either individually or in community with others and in public or private, to manifest 

his religion or belief in worship, observance, practice and 

teaching’’; and 

Whereas the President of the United States has expressed his 

concern about the Abdul Rahman apostasy case, stating 

that ‘‘[i]t is deeply troubling that a country we helped 

liberate would hold a person to account, because they 

chose a particular religion over another’’: Now, therefore, 

be it

Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

(1) condemns, in the strongest possible terms, the 

enforcement of laws against apostasy; 

(2) requests the President to continue to work with 

the Government of Afghanistan to establish better protections for religious minorities, including converts to 

minority religions, and to enhance human rights protections in Afghanistan; and 

(3) calls upon the Government of Afghanistan, and 

especially President Hamid Karzai, to continue to conform Afghan laws to Afghanistan’s international human 

rights treaty obligations, thereby protecting Afghan citi-
3

•HRES 736 EH 

zens who have converted or plan to convert to other religions from prosecution.

Attest: 

Clerk.
§ 719.6 Are there any types of legal matters not included in the coverage of this part? Legal matters not covered by this part include: ( a ) Matters handled by counsel retained by an insurance carrier, except under retrospective insurance in accordance with § 719.45;
( b ) Routine intellectual property law support services; and
( c ) Routine workers and unemployment compensation matters.
§ 820.14 Whistleblower protection. ( a ) *Covered acts.* An act of retaliation (as defined in 10 CFR 708.2) by a DOE contractor, prohibited by 10 CFR 708.43, that results from a DOE contractor employee's involvement in an activity listed in 10 CFR 708.5(a) through (c) may constitute a violation of a DOE Nuclear Safety Requirement if it concerns nuclear safety.
( b ) *Commencement of investigation.* The Director may not initiate an investigation or take any other action under this part with respect to an alleged act of retaliation by a DOE contractor until 180 days after an alleged violation of 10 CFR 708.43 occurs.
( c ) *Administrative or judicial proceedings.* The Director shall immediately suspend any ongoing activities under this part and suspend any time limits under this part when an administrative or judicial proceeding commences based on the same alleged act of retaliation. While an administrative or judicial proceeding, including appeals, is pending, the Director may not exercise any authority under this part based on an alleged violation of 10 CFR 708.43, including issuing enforcement letters, subpoenas, orders to compel attendance, Consent Orders, Preliminary Notices of Violation, or Final Notices of Violation. Once such a proceeding commences, the Director shall not conduct any activities under this part until sixty days after a final decision of an agency or court finds that a retaliation occurred, or otherwise makes a final disposition of the matter on procedural grounds without explicitly finding that retaliation did not occur.
( d ) *Final decision.* For the purposes of this section, a final decision of an agency or court includes any of the following: ( 1 ) A final agency decision pursuant to 10 CFR part 708;
( 2 ) A final decision or order of the Secretary of Labor pursuant to 29 CFR part 24;
( 3 ) A decision by the Secretary upon a report by the Inspector General;
( 4 ) A decision by a federal or state court.
( e ) *Evidentiary record.* If a final decision of an agency or court finds that retaliation occurred, the Director may obtain and use information collected as part of those proceedings. The Director has discretion to give appropriate weight to information obtained from these proceedings and to initiate and conduct further investigation if the Director deems necessary, particularly with regard to the relationship between the retaliation and nuclear safety.
( f ) *Underlying nuclear safety requirements.* Notwithstanding the commencement of an administrative or judicial proceeding based on an alleged act of retaliation, this section shall not prevent the Director from taking any action consistent with this part regarding compliance with DOE Nuclear Safety Requirements other than 10 CFR 708.43.
[81 FR 94914, Dec. 27, 2016]
#### Board of Education of Grant Community High School District No. 121, Lake County, Appellant, v. Board of Education of Richmond-Burton Community High School District No. 157, McHenry County, Appellee.

Gen. No. 9,569.

Opinion filed June 28, 1940.

Charles E. Jack, of Waukegan, and Richard F. Locke, of Glen Ellyn, for appellant.

Floyd E. Eckert and Arthur G. Waite, of Woodstock, for appellee.

Mr. Justice Huffman

delivered the opinion of the court.

*262The amended complaint in this case charges that appellant district is a duly organized high school district situated entirely within Lake county, Illinois; that appellee district is a duly organized high school district situated entirely within McHenry county, Illinois; that the county superintendent of schools in and for McHenry county, approved the transfer of certain resident students of appellee district to appellant *district;*that pursuant to such transfer, these students attended the high school in appellant district for the school years of 1930-1931 and 1931-1932; that because of such transfer of the students from appellee district to appellant district, appellee district thereby became indebted to appellant district for certain tuition, as claimed in the complaint.

Appellee district filed its motion to dismiss the amended complaint, on the ground that under section 96 of the school law, providing for the attendance of a pupil in a district other than that in which he resides, and where the two districts lie in more than one county, the pupil so transferred must have the approval of the county superintendent of each of the counties involved, before the district in which he resides can be charged with his tuition. Upon this motion the court dismissed the complaint and appellant brings this appeal.

It appears that the pupils transferred from appellee district to appellant district at the instance of the county superintendent of appellee district, did not have or receive the approval of the county superintendent of appellant district for such transfer. The order of the trial court dismissing the complaint and its judgment against appellant district was proper. *Board of Education Onarga Township High School v. Board of Education Thawville Community High School,*308 Ill. 231; *Board of Education Blue Mound Community High School v. Board of Education Stonington Community High School,*312 Ill. 31.

The judgment of the trial court is therefore affirmed.

*Judgment affirmed.*
#### McNALLY, Respondent, v. UNITED TRACTION CO., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

July 1, 1914.)

Action by Bart H. McNally against the United Traction Company.

No opinion. Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs.
| (logo) **ncb**  National Cooperative Bank    | 2011 Crystal Drive  Suite, 8oo  Arlington, VA 22202 |
|---------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------|

 

 

February6, 2019

 

 

WellsFargo Commercial Mortgage Securities, Inc. as Depositor

Attn:Anthony Sfarra

375Park Avenue, 2nd Floor

J0127-023

NewYork, NY 10152

 

RE:         Annual Statement as to Compliance

               WFRBS 2013 C12

 

 

DearSir/Madam:

 

Inaccordance with the Pooling and Servicing Agreement entered into in connectionwith the issuance of the Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series2013-C12, as an authorized officer of National Cooperative Bank, N.A. (the “NCBMaster Servicer”), I hereby certify pursuant to Section 11.12 thereof that:

 

a.       Areview of the activities of the NCB Master Servicer during the precedingcalendar year (the “Reporting Period”) and of its performance under the Poolingand Servicing Agreement has been made under my supervision.

 

b.       To thebest of my knowledge, based on these reviews, the NCB Master Servicer has fulfilledall obligations under this agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

Pleasenote that the annual financial statement will be sent under separate cover onor before March 31, 2019.

 

 

Bestregards,

/s/Karyn Mann

KarynMann

SeniorVice President, Investor Compliance

NationalCooperative Bank, N.A.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

June 2, 2016

No. 04

- 15

- 0079 9

- CR

Eric G. YZAGUIRRE

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 25th Judicial District Court, Guadalupe County, Texas

Trial Court No. 13

- 1569

- CR

- C Honorable Gary L. Steel, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

Appellant’s brief was originally due February 29, 2016 , but was not filed

. Because appellant’s counsel filed neither the brief nor a motion to extend time to file the brief, this court sent counsel a notice advising him the brief was past due. On March 11, 2016, in response to our notice, counsel filed a motion to extend time to file the brief, which this court granted. After we granted appellant’s first request for extension of time, his brief was due April 11, 2016

— forty

two days from the original due date. The brief was not file by the due date, but on April 17, 2016, appe llant’s counsel filed a second motion to extend time to file his brief and a motion to supplement the reporter’s record. In the motion to supplement, and for the first time, appellant’s

counsel state d certain portions of the reporter’s record ha d not been filed and he could not complete the appellate brief without them. In his extension, he ask ed that he be allowed thirty days after the record is supplement ed to file his brief.

In response, on April 19, 2016, we ordered the court reporter to file thos e portions of the record requested by counsel . On June 1, 2016, the reporter filed several supplemental volumes of the reporter’s record. Accordingly, per our prior order, which required appellant to file his brief in this court on or before thirty days from the date the supplemental reporter’s record was filed, we ORDER appellant to file appellant’s brief in this court on or before July 1, 2016

.We order the clerk of this court to serve a copy of this order on all counsel.

_________________________________ Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 2nd d ay of June, 2016

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 12 -423V Filed: September 21 , 2015

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * MARY KATE WRIGHT and * GARRY WRIGHT, * as legal representatives of a minor child, M.W., * Petitioners, * Interim Attorney Fees and Costs;

v. * Stipulation * SECRETARY OF HEALTH * AND HUMAN SERVICES, * Respondent. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Mindy Michaels Roth

, Britcher, Leone & Roth, LLC, Glen Rock, NJ, for petitioners

. Lara Ann Englund

, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

DECISION ON INTERIM ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS 1

Vowell, Chief Special Master:

In this case under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program [hereinafter “the Program”], 2 petitioners submitted a request for attorney fees and costs

on September 8, 2015 [the “Application”]

. See Avera v. Sec’y, HHS , 515 F.3d 1343, 1352 (Fed. Cir. 2008). On September 10, 2015, the parties filed a Stipulation of Fact Concerning Attorneys’ Fees and Costs [“Stipulation”], wherein they explain that based on discussion of respondent’s objections, petitioner s amend their Application to request an award of $80,000.00. 3 Respondent does not object to this amount. Stipulation ¶ 3.

I find that petitioner is entitled to an award of interim attorney fees and costs under the facts and circumstances of this case. A review of the materials offered in

1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I intendto post this decision on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with the EGovernment Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, § 205, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (codified as amended at 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2006))

. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and

m ove to delete medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will delete such material from public access.

2 The applicable statutory provisions defining the Program are found at 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10 et seq

. (2006).

3 Petitioners did not file a statement comporting with General Order 9. However, because any costs personally incurred by petitioners can be addressed in a subsequent award of fees and costs, I have elected to act on this interim application without that statement.2

support of the application for interim attorney fees and costs indicates that the agreed amount is reasonable. Accordingly, I hereby award the total of $80,000.00 issued in the form of a check payable jointly to petitioners
, Mary Kate Wright and Garry Wright, and petitioners ’ attorney, Mindy Michaels Roth, for interim attorney fees and costs.

The clerk of court shall enter judgment accordingly. 4

IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Denise K. Vowell Denise K. Vowell Special Master

4 Entry of judgment can be expedited by each party’s filing a notice renouncing the right to seek review. See Vaccine Rule 11(a).
#### § 835.102 Internal audits.

Internal audits of the radiation protection program, including examination of program content and implementation, shall be conducted through a process that ensures that all functional elements are reviewed no less frequently than every 36 months.

[63 FR 59682, Nov. 4, 1998]
#### § 54.1 Purpose.

This part governs the issuance of renewed operating licenses and renewed combined licenses for nuclear power plants licensed pursuant to Sections 103 or 104b of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, and Title II of the Energy Reorganization Act of 1974 (88 Stat. 1242).

[72 FR 49560, Aug. 28, 2007]
# EUR-Lex - 31983R2333 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31983R2333

**Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2333/83 of 11 August 1983 on the classification of goods falling within heading No 15.06 of the Common Customs Tariff **

*
Official Journal L 224 , 17/08/1983 P. 0013 - 0013 Finnish special edition: Chapter 2 Volume 4 P. 0003 Spanish special edition: Chapter 02 Volume 10 P. 0060 Swedish special edition: Chapter 2 Volume 4 P. 0003 Portuguese special edition Chapter 02 Volume 10 P. 0060 *

*****

COMMISSION REGULATION (EEC) No 2333/83

of 11 August 1983

on the classification of goods falling within heading No 15.06 of the Common Customs Tariff

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN

COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 97/69 of 16 January 1969 on measures to be taken for uniform application of the Common Customs Tariff nomenclature (1), as last amended by the Act of Accession of Greece, and in particular Article 3 thereof,

Whereas, in order to ensure uniform application of the Common Customs Tariff nomenclature, provisions must be laid down concerning the tariff classification of a product consisting of partly hydrolyzed pig fat, obtained as a by-product in the manufacture of gelatin from pigskin by the action of strong acids, with a free fatty acid content (calculated as oleic acid) of 10 % or more, and a peroxide index of about 5 or more;

Whereas heading No 15.01 of the Common Customs Tariff annexed to Council Regulation (EEC) No 950/68 (2), as last amended by Regulation (EEC) No 3000/82 (3), refers to lard, other pig fat and poultry fat rendered or solvent-extracted:

Whereas heading No 15.06 refers to animal oils and fats (including neat's-foot oil and fats from bones or waste);

Whereas the product in question, by reason of its production process, cannot be classified under heading No 15.01 and that it therefore falls within heading No 15.06;

Whereas the measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee on Common Customs Tariff Nomenclature,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The product consisting of partly hydrolyzed pig fat, obtained as a by-product in the manufacture of gelatin from pigskin by the action of strong acids, with a free fatty acid content (calculated as oleic acid) of 10 % or more, and a peroxide index of about 5 or more, shall be classified in the Common Customs Tariff under heading No:

15.06 Other animal oils and fats (including neat's- foot oil and fats from bones or waste).

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the 21st day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 11 August 1983.

For the Commission

Étienne DAVIGNON

Vice-President

(1) OJ No L 14, 21. 1. 1969, p. 1.

(2) OJ No L 172, 22. 7. 1968, p. 1.

(3) OJ No L 318, 15. 11. 1982, p. 1.
IV 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 312 

Recognizing National Homeownership Month and the importance of 

homeownership in the United States. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 9, 2005 

Mr. GARY G. MILLER of California (for himself, Mr. OXLEY, Mr. FRANK of 

Massachusetts, Mr. NEY, Ms. WATERS, and Ms. HARRIS) submitted the 

following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Financial 

Services 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing National Homeownership Month and the 

importance of homeownership in the United States. 

Whereas the President of the United States has issued a 

proclamation designating the month of June 2005 as National Homeownership Month; 

Whereas the national homeownership rate in the United 

States has reached a record high of 69.1 percent and 

more than half of all minority families are homeowners; 

Whereas the people of the United States are one of the besthoused populations in the world; 

Whereas owning a home is a fundamental part of the American dream and is the largest personal investment many 

families will ever make; 
2 

•HRES 312 IH 

Whereas homeownership provides economic security for homeowners by aiding them in building wealth over time and 

strengthens communities through a greater stake among 

homeowners in local schools, civic organizations, and 

churches; 

Whereas improving homeownership opportunities requires the 

commitment and cooperation of the private, public, and 

nonprofit sectors, including the Federal Government and 

State and local governments; and 

Whereas the current laws of the United States, such as the 

American Dream Downpayment Act, encourage homeownership and should continue to do so in the future: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) fully supports the goals and ideals of Na3 tional Homeownership Month; and 

4 (2) recognizes the importance of homeownership 

5 in building strong communities and families. 

Æ