alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 74.53 Process monitoring. ( a ) Licensees subject to § 74.51 shall monitor internal transfers, storage, and processing of SSNM. The process monitoring must achieve the detection capabilities described in paragraph (b) of this section for all SSNM except: ( 1 ) SSNM that is subject to the item loss detection requirements of § 74.55;
( 2 ) Scrap in the form of small pieces, cuttings, chips, solutions, or in other forms that result from a manufacturing process, held in containers of 30 gallons or larger, with an SSNM content of less than 0.25 grams per liter;
( 3 ) SSNM with an estimated measurement standard deviation greater than five percent that is either input or output material associated with a unit that processes less than five formula kilograms over a consecutive three-month period; and
( 4 ) SSNM involved in research and development operations that process less than five formula kilograms during any seven-consecutive-day period.
( b ) *Unit process detection capability.* For each unit process, a licensee shall establish a production quality control program capable of monitoring the status of material in process. The program shall include: ( 1 ) A statistical test that has at least a 95 percent power of detecting an abrupt loss of five formula kilograms within three working days of a loss of Category IA material from any accessible process location and within seven calendar days of a loss of Category IB material from any accessible process location;
( 2 ) A quality control test whereby process differences greater than three times the estimated standard deviation of the process difference estimator and 25 grams of SSNM are investigated; and
( 3 ) A trend analysis for monitoring and evaluating sequences of material control test results from each unit process to determine if they indicate a pattern of losses or gains that are of safeguards significance.
( c ) For research and development operations exempt from the requirements of paragraph (b) of this section, the licensee shall: ( 1 ) Perform material balance tests on a lot or a batch basis, as appropriate, or monthly, whichever is sooner, and investigate any difference greater than 200 grams of plutonium or U-233 or 300 grams of U-235 that exceeds three times the estimated standard error of the inventory difference estimator;
( 2 ) Evaluate material balance results generated during an inventory period for indications of measurement biases or unidentified loss streams and investigate, determine the cause(s) of, and institute corrective action for cumulative inventory differences generated during an inventory period that exceed three formula kilograms of SSNM.
§ 76.21 Certificate required. ( a ) The Corporation or its contractors may not operate the gaseous diffusion plants at Piketon, Ohio, and Paducah, Kentucky, unless an appropriate certificate of compliance, and/or an approved compliance plan is in effect under this part. Unless authorized by the NRC under other provisions of this chapter, a person other than the Corporation or its contractors may not acquire, deliver, receive, possess, use, or transfer radioactive material at the gaseous diffusion plants at Piketon, Ohio, and Paducah, Kentucky.
( b ) For the purposes of §§ 30.41, 40.51, and 70.42 of this chapter, the Corporation shall be authorized to receive, and licensees shall be authorized to transfer to the Corporation, byproduct material, source material, or special nuclear material to the extent permitted under the certificate of compliance issued, and/or the compliance plan approved, pursuant to this part.
[59 FR 48960, Sept. 23, 1994, as amended at 62 FR 6669, Feb. 12, 1997; 64 FR 44649, Aug. 17, 1999]
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Shamod Murray, Appellant.

[813 NYS2d 717]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Rena K. Uviller, J.) rendered March 3, 2004, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 472 to 9 years, unanimously affirmed.

The record establishes that defendant validly waived his right to be present at sidebar discussions with prospective jurors *(see People v Keen,*94 NY2d 533, 538 [2000]; *People v Spruill,*212 AD2d 381 [1995], *lv denied*85 NY2d 943 [1995]). The court noted on the record that some jurors may be embarrassed to discuss certain subjects in open court, and asked counsel to explain to defendant his *Antommarchi*rights *(see People v An*
      *318
      *tommarchi,*80 NY2d 247 [1992]). After conferring with defendant, counsel announced in open court that defendant was waiving his right to be present at sidebars. The court then obtained an express personal" waiver from defendant. Since “embarrassing” matters include matters relating to bias that a panelist might not wish to discuss publicly, there is no merit to defendant’s claim that the court misinformed him that the sidebars would not involve the panelists’ potential biases.

Defendant is not entitled, pursuant to the amelioration doctrine of *People v Behlog*(74 NY2d 237 [1989]), to the benefit of the reduced penalty contained in the Drug Law Reform Act (L 2004, ch 738), because the Legislature has expressly stated that the subject provision applies only to crimes committed after its effective date *(People v Nelson,*21 AD3d 861 [2005], *lv granted*6 NY3d 757 [2005]). In any event, the amelioration doctrine does not apply where, as here, a defendant was sentenced before the new law’s effective date *(People v Walker,*81 NY2d 661, 666-667 [1993]).

Defendant’s remaining contentions are unpreserved and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. Were we to review these claims, we would reject them. Concur—Tom, J.P., Mazzarelli, Friedman, Marlow and Malone, JJ.
§ 76.36 Renewals. ( a ) The Corporation shall file periodic applications for renewal, as required by § 76.31.
( b ) Information contained in previous applications, statements, or reports filed with the Commission may be referenced as part of the application, provided that the reference is clear and specific.
( c ) An application for renewal is subject to the requirements in § 76.33 and must contain the following information: ( 1 ) The information specified in § 76.35; or,
( 2 ) A statement by the Corporation that the NRC may rely upon the information provided in the previous application(s) upon which the existing certificate is based, except for: ( i ) Any proposed changes in the existing certificate of compliance conditions or technical safety requirements;
( ii ) Any proposed changes to the documents submitted with the previous application in accordance with § 76.35;
( iii ) Any changes which the Corporation has made without prior NRC approval pursuant to § 76.68; and,
( iv ) Any changes to certificate conditions or technical safety requirements for which the Corporation has sought and received Commission approval pursuant to § 76.45.
( d ) The changes which are submitted as part of an application for renewal in accordance with paragraph (c)(2) of this section, must be in the form of specific changes to the documentation specified in § 76.35. The changes must be marked and dated for easy identification.
[59 FR 48960, Sept. 23, 1994, as amended at 62 FR 6670, Feb. 12, 1997; 64 FR 44649, Aug. 17, 1999]
§ 820.38 Consolidation and severance. ( a ) *Consolidation.* The Presiding Officer may, by motion or *sua sponte,* consolidate any or all matters at issue in two or more enforcement adjudications under this part where there exists common parties or common questions of fact or law, consolidation would expedite and simplify consideration of the issues, and consolidation would not adversely affect the rights of parties engaged in otherwise separate adjudications.
( b ) *Severance.* The Presiding Officer may, by motion or *sua sponte,* for good cause shown order any enforcement adjudication severed with respect to any or all parties or issues.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Somsak Chivavibul,
certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period
covered by this report on Form 10-K of SLM Student Loan Trust 2013-1 (the Exchange Act periodic reports);

2. Based on my
knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing
and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer and administrator have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreement and administration agreement, as applicable, in all material respects; and

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this
report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K. In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as indenture trustee.

Date: March 31, 2015



|                                                                     
|---------------------------------------------------------------------
|/S/ SOMSAK CHIVAVIBUL                                                
|Somsak Chivavibul                                                    
|President and Chief Financial Officer (Senior Securitization Officer)
|Navient Funding, LLC
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsBOREAS TE-23 Canopy Architecture and Spectral Data from Hemispherical PhotographsThe Boreal Ecosystem-Atmospheric Study (BOREAS) TE-23 (Terrestrial Ecology) team collected hemispherical photographs in support of its efforts to characterize and interpret information on estimates of canopy architecture and radiative transfer properties for most BOREAS study sites. Various Old Aspen (OA), Old Black Spruce (OBS), Old Jack Pine (OJP), Young Jack Pine (YJP), and Young Aspen (YA) sites in the boreal forest were measured from May to August 1994. The hemispherical photographs were used to derive values of leaf area index (LAI), leaf angle, gap fraction, and clumping index. This documentation describes these derived values. The derived data are stored in tabular ASCII files. The hemispherical photographs are stored in the original set of 42 CD-ROMs that were supplied by TE-23. The data files are available on a CD-ROM (see document number 20010000884), or from the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) Distributed Active Archive Center (DAAC).Document ID20010005253Acquisition SourceGoddard Space Flight CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsRich, Paul M.*(Kansas Univ. Lawrence, KS United States)*Hall, Forrest G.*(NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt, MD United States)*Papagno, Andrea*(Raytheon Information Technology and Scientific Services Greenbelt, MD United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 7, 2013Publication DateOctober 1, 2000Subject CategoryEarth Resources And Remote SensingReport/Patent NumberRept-2000-03136-0/VOL187NASA/TM-2000-209891/VOL187NAS 1.15:209891/VOL187Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 462-33-01Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20010005253.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### § 950.2 Scope and applicability.

This part sets forth the policies and procedures for the award and administration of Standby Support Contracts between the Department and sponsors of new advanced nuclear facilities.
Top of page

Skip to main content

Library of Congress

              - Discover
              - Services
              - Visit
              - Education
              - Connect
              - Shop *external link*
              - Donate
              - About
              - Ask a Librarian
              - Help
              - Contact
              - Search Online Catalog
              - Copyright.gov
              - Congress.gov

Library of Congress
Digital Collections
United States Statutes at Large
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q FOR THE
QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          12,926
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                              71
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                    82
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     63,683
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          56,923
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        400,066
<ALLOWANCE>                                      4,169
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 548,135
<DEPOSITS>                                     460,503
<SHORT-TERM>                                    13,265
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              6,067
<LONG-TERM>                                     15,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        12,634
<OTHER-SE>                                      40,666
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 548,135
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 25,174
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                5,445
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   259
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                30,878
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              14,036
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              15,090
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           15,788
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    1,152
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  76
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 14,787
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,159
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       3,159
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,050
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .41
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .40
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.14
<LOANS-NON>                                        791
<LOANS-PAST>                                     1,277
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 3,289
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      488
<RECOVERIES>                                       216
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                4,169
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             3,734
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            435


</TABLE>
§ 60.31 Construction authorization. Upon review and consideration of an application and environmental impact statement submitted under this part, the Commission may authorize construction if it determines: ( a ) *Safety.* That there is reasonable assurance that the types and amounts of radioactive materials described in the application can be received, possessed, and disposed of in a geologic repository operations area of the design proposed without unreasonable risk to the health and safety of the public. In arriving at this determination, the Commission shall consider whether: ( 1 ) DOE has described the proposed geologic repository including but not limited to: ( i ) The geologic, geophysical, geochemical and hydrologic characteristics of the site;
( ii ) the kinds and quantities of radioactive waste to be received, possessed, stored, and disposed of in the geologic repository operations area;
( iii ) the principal architectural and engineering criteria for the design of the geologic repository operations area;
( iv ) construction procedures which may affect the capability of the geologic repository to serve its intended function; and
( v ) features or components incorporated in the design for the protection of the health and safety of the public.
( 2 ) The site and design comply with the performance objectives and criteria contained in Subpart E of this part.
( 3 ) The DOE's quality assurance program complies with the requirements of Subpart G of this part.
( 4 ) The DOE's personnel training program complies with the criteria contained in Subpart H of this part.
( 5 ) The DOE's emergency plan complies with the criteria contained in Subpart I of this part.
( 6 ) The DOE's proposed operating procedures to protect health and to minimize danger to life or property are adequate.
( b ) *Common defense and security.* That there is reasonable assurance that the activities proposed in the application will not be inimical to the common defense and security.
( c ) *Environmental.* That, after weighing the environmental, economic, technical and other benefits against environmental costs and considering available alternatives, the action called for is issuance of the construction authorization, with any appropriate conditions to protect environmental values.
[46 FR 13980, Feb. 25, 1981, as amended at 48 FR 28220, June 21, 1983; 54 FR 27872, July 3, 1989; 63 FR 26961, May 15, 1998]
#### Gerhard Habben, Appellant, v. Vern Robertson, Appellee.

Gen. No. 9,540.

opinion filed June 28, 1940.

Pallissard & Smith, for appellant; Malo & Bell and Arthur Bohn, for appellee.

Opinion by

Presiding Justice Wolfe.

‘ ‘Not to be published in full.”
#### § 52.81 Standards for review of applications.

Applications filed under this subpart will be reviewed according to the standards set out in 10 CFR parts 20, 50, 51, 54, 55, 73, 100, and 140.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 09**  **- 8105** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. WILLIAM CLYDE MURPHY, JR. , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the E astern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh
. James C. Fox , Senior District Judge. ( 7:05

- cr - 00034

- F

- 1 ; 7:09

- cv - 00164

- F )

Submitted : July 27, 2010 Decided: August 4, 2010

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and K EENAN , Circuit Judges.

Di smissed by un published per curiam opinion
. William Clyde Murphy, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 P ER CURIAM: William Clyde Murphy, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. A. § 2255 ( West Supp. 2010 ) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U .S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (200 6 ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (200 6 ). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies thi s standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). W hen the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 48 4

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Murphy has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentio ns are adequately presented in the materials3 before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process. DISMISSED
#### § 733.7 Referral to the contracting officer.

If the DOE Office of the Inspector General declines to investigate an allegation of research misconduct, the DOE Element should forward the allegation to the contracting officer responsible for administration of the contract or financial assistance agreement to which the allegation pertains.
**EXHIBIT 35.1**

 

**SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT**

**New Holland Credit Company, LLC**

 

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of New Holland Credit Company, LLC (“NHCC”), as Servicer pursuant to the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of February 1, 2013 (as amended from time to time, the “Sale and Servicing Agreement”) by and among NHCC, CNH Capital Receivables LLC and CNH Equipment Trust 2013-A, does hereby certify that:

 

1.             NHCC is Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement.

 

2.             The undersigned is duly authorized as required pursuant to the Sale and Servicing Agreement to execute and deliver this Certificate to the Indenture Trustee.

 

3.             This Certificate is delivered pursuant to Section 4.9(a) of the Sale and Servicing Agreement and Item 1123 of Regulation AB.

 

4.             A review of the Servicer’s activities during the 12 month period ending (and including) December 31, 2014 and of its performance under the Sale and Servicing Agreement has been made under my supervision.

 

5.             To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Sale and Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the 12 month period ending (and including) December 31, 2014.

 

6.             IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 30th day of March, 2015.

 

----

 
| March 30,   2015 |   |
|-----------------------|--------|
|                  |   |
|                  | By:    | /s/   Brett D. Davis |
|                  | Name:  | Brett   D. Davis |
|                  | Title: | President |

 

----