alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 72
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 72 appear at 80 FR 74981, Dec. 1, 2015, and at 81 FR 86910, Dec. 2, 2016.

§ 72.22 Contents of application: General and financial information. Each application must state: ( a ) Full name of applicant;
( b ) Address of applicant;
( c ) Description of business or occupation of applicant;
( d ) If applicant is: ( 1 ) An individual: Citizenship and age;
( 2 ) A partnership: Name, citizenship, and address of each partner and the principal location at which the partnership does business;
( 3 ) A corporation or an unincorporated association: ( i ) The State in which it is incorporated or organized and the principal location at which it does business; and
( ii ) The names, addresses, and citizenship of its directors and principal officers;
( 4 ) Acting as an agent or representative of another person in filing the application: The identification of the principal and the information required under this paragraph with respect to such principal.
( 5 ) The Department of Energy: ( i ) The identification of the DOE organization responsible for the construction and operation of the ISFSI or MRS, including a description of any delegations of authority and assignments of responsibilities.
( ii ) For each application for a license for an MRS, the provisions of the public law authorizing the construction and operation of the MRS.
( e ) Except for DOE, information sufficient to demonstrate to the Commission the financial qualifications of the applicant to carry out, in accordance with the regulations in this chapter, the activities for which the license is sought. The information must state the place at which the activity is to be performed, the general plan for carrying out the activity, and the period of time for which the license is requested. The information must show that the applicant either possesses the necessary funds, or that the applicant has reasonable assurance of obtaining the necessary; funds or that by a combination of the two, the applicant will have the necessary funds available to cover the following: ( 1 ) Estimated construction costs;
( 2 ) Estimated operating costs over the planned life of the ISFSI; and
( 3 ) Estimated decommissioning costs, and the necessary financial arrangements to provide reasonable assurance before licensing, that decommissioning will be carried out after the removal of spent fuel, high-level radioactive waste, and/or reactor-related GTCC waste from storage.
( f ) Each applicant for a license under this part to receive, transfer, and possess power reactor spent fuel, power reactor-related Greater than Class C (GTCC) waste, and other radioactive materials associated with spent fuel storage in an independent spent fuel storage installation (ISFSI) shall protect Safeguards Information against unauthorized disclosure in accordance with the requirements in § 73.21 and the requirements of § 73.22 or § 73.23, as applicable.
[53 FR 31658, Aug. 19, 1988, as amended at 66 FR 51839, Oct. 11, 2001; 73 FR 63573, Oct. 24, 2008]
§ 76.123 Tests. The Corporation shall perform, or permit the Commission to perform, any tests the Commission deems appropriate or necessary for administration of the requirements in this part. These tests include tests of: ( a ) Radioactive material;
( b ) Facilities where radioactive material is utilized, produced or stored;
( c ) Radiation detection and monitoring instruments; and
( d ) Other equipment and devices used in connection with the production, utilization, or storage of radioactive material.
# EUR-Lex - 31987R2685 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31987R2685

**Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2685/87 of 4 September 1987 concerning the stopping of fishing for pollack by vessels flying the flag of Spain **

*
Official Journal L 254 , 05/09/1987 P. 0012 - 0012 *

*****

COMMISSION REGULATION (EEC) No 2685/87

of 4 September 1987

concerning the stopping of fishing for pollack by vessels flying the flag of Spain

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community,

Having regard to council Regulation (EEC) No 2241/87 of 23 July 1987 establishing certain control measures for fishing activities (1), and in particular Article 11 (3) thereof,

Whereas Council Regulation (EEC) No 4034/86 of 22 December 1986, fixing, for certain fish stocks and groups of fish stocks, total allowable catches for 1987 and certain conditions under which they may be fished (2), as last amended by Regulation (EEC) No 1880/87 (3) provides for pollack quotas for 1987;

Whereas, in order to ensure compliance with the provisions relating to the quantitative limitations on catches of stocks subject to quotas, it is necessary for the Commission to fix the date by which catches made by vessels flying the flag of a Member State are deemed to have exhausted the quota allocated;

Whereas, according to the information communicated to the Commission, catches of pollack in the waters of ICES division VII by vessels flying the flag of Spain or registered in Spain have reached the quota allocated for 1987,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Catches of pollack in the waters of ICES division VII by vessels flying the flag of Spain or registered in Spain are deemed to have exhausted the quota allocated to Spain for 1987.

Fishing for pollack in the waters of ICES division VII by vessels flying the flag of Spain or registered in Spain is prohibited, as well as the retention on board, the transhipment and the landing of such stock captured by the abovementioned vessels after the date of entry into force of this Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 4 September 1987.

For the Commission

Willy DE CLERCQ

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ No L 207, 29. 7. 1987, p. 1.

(2) OJ No L 376, 31. 12. 1986, p. 39.

(3) OJ No L 179, 3. 7. 1987, p. 4.
September 2 0 , 2016

Exemption No. 12659 A
Regulatory Docket No. FAA

– 20 15

– 1780

Mr. Tim Lawrence
Aerial Technology International, LLC dba ATIP, Aerial Technology International
Productions, Apex Innovations

27350 SW 95th Ave #3022

Wilsonville

, O R 97070

Dear Mr. Lawrence :

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition for an amendment. It explains
the basis for our decision, describes its effect, and lists any changes to the original conditions

and limitations.

By letter posted to the public docket on July 22, 2016 , you petitioned the Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA) on behalf of Aerial Technology International, LLC dba ATIP, Aerial
Technology Internationa l Productions, Apex Innovations (hereinafter petitioner or operator)

for an amendment to your current exemption . That exemption from §§ 61.23(a) and ( c ),

61.101(e)(4 ) and (5), 61.113(a), 61.315(a) , 91.7(a), 91.119(c), 91.121, 91.151(a)(1),
91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) and (2), and 91.417(a) and (b) of Title 14, Code of
Federal Regulations (14 CFR) allows the petitioner to conduct UAS operations

. You requested an amendment to change the company name from Aerial Technology International,

LLC to Aerial Technology International, LLC dba ATIP, Aerial Technology International
Productions, Apex Innovations. 1

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons
relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition

in the Federal Register because the requested amendment to the exemption would not set a
precedent, and any delay in acti ng on this pe tition would be detrimental to the petitioner

.

1 The petitioner also requested to add aircraft. At this time, the FAA is unable to act on this request. When the
FAA is ready to act, we will proceed accordingly and no further action will be required by the petitioner.2

Our Decision

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 12659
remains valid and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the authority contained

in 49 U.S.C

. 106(f), 40113, and 44701, delegated to me by the Administrator, the operator is
granted an amendment to change the operator name

.

The operator shall add this amendment to its original exemption.

Conditions and Limitations

In this grant of amendment, Aerial Technology International, LLC dba ATIP, Aerial
Technology International Productions, Apex Innovations is hereafter referred to as the

operator. All conditions and limitations within Grant of Exemption No. 12659 remain in

effect

.

Failur e to comply with any of the conditions and limitations of this grant of exemption will be
grounds for the immediate suspension or rescission of this exemption.

T his exemption terminates on August 31, 2017 , unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincere ly,

/ s/

John S. Duncan

Di rector, Flight Standards Service
EXHIBIT 35.2

SERVICERS CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE

Re: Assessment of compliance for services provided pursuant to the Master Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated February 27, 2007, the Series Supplement,
dated January 8, 2013, the US$ Note Trust Deed, dated January 9, 2013, and other transaction documents relating to SMART ABS Series 2013-1US Trust (collectively, the Agreements).

The undersigned hereby certifies that:



| | 1. | I, Alan Cameron, am a Director of Macquarie Securities Management Pty Limited (the Manager).
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | A review of the Managers activities during the period from April 1, 2013 through March 31, 2014 (the Reporting Period), and of its performance under each of the Agreements has been
made under my supervision.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 3. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Manager has fulfilled all of its obligations under each of the Agreements in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                            |  | 
|------------------------------------------- |  | 
|Date: 25 June 2014                          |  | 
|                                            | 
|/s/ Alan Cameron                            |  | 
|Alan Cameron
Director                       |  | 
|                                           
|Macquarie Securities Management Pty Limited
#### § 820.35 *Ex parte* discussions.

At no time after a respondent has requested an on-the-record adjudication of the assessment of a civil penalty shall a DOE Official, or any person who is likely to advise a DOE Official in the decision on the case, discuss *ex parte* the merits of the proceeding with any interested person outside DOE, with any DOE staff member who performs a prosecutorial or investigative function in such proceeding or a factually related proceeding, or with any representative of such person. Any *ex parte* memorandum or other communication addressed to a DOE Official during the pendency of the proceeding and relating to the merits thereof, by or on behalf of any party shall be regarded as argument made in the proceeding and shall be served upon all other parties. Any oral communication shall be set forth in a written memorandum and served on all other parties. The other parties shall be given an opportunity to reply to such memorandum or communication.
P.1 

OAR Box 1784 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

20) 11 -A-2 

Docket Number: 

A-84-44 

Printed 10/31/2008 8:05:38 AM Sheet 20 of 143 
JL2 

A-84-44 

U-A-2 

rtris. PROPERTY OF EPA UBRARY 

EPA-650/2-73-017 

August 1973 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION TECHNOLOGY SERIES 

>W: 

i 

m 

•:•:•:•:•: 

ATMOSPHERIC {MISSIONS FROM 

THI PETROLEUM REFINING INDUSTRY 

J * 

rt£0 ST<, 

^ 

SE O 

T 

%

~ ^ 

: <•; til U ..•,'..,-.. . 

MIS
Editorial Note on Part 72
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 72 appear at 80 FR 74981, Dec. 1, 2015, and at 81 FR 86910, Dec. 2, 2016.

§ 72.126 Criteria for radiological protection. ( a ) *Exposure control.* Radiation protection systems must be provided for all areas and operations where onsite personnel may be exposed to radiation or airborne radioactive materials. Structures, systems, and components for which operation, maintenance, and required inspections may involve occupational exposure must be designed, fabricated, located, shielded, controlled, and tested so as to control external and internal radiation exposures to personnel. The design must include means to: ( 1 ) Prevent the accumulation of radioactive material in those systems requiring access;
( 2 ) Decontaminate those systems to which access is required;
( 3 ) Control access to areas of potential contamination or high radiation within the ISFSI or MRS;
( 4 ) Measure and control contamination of areas requiring access;
( 5 ) Minimize the time required to perform work in the vicinity of radioactive components; for example, by providing sufficient space for ease of operation and designing equipment for ease of repair and replacement; and
( 6 ) Shield personnel from radiation exposure.
( b ) *Radiological alarm systems.* Radiological alarm systems must be provided in accessible work areas as appropriate to warn operating personnel of radiation and airborne radioactive material concentrations above a given setpoint and of concentrations of radioactive material in effluents above control limits. Radiation alarm systems must be designed with provisions for calibration and testing their operability.
( c ) *Effluent and direct radiation monitoring.* ( 1 ) As appropriate for the handling and storage system, effluent systems must be provided. Means for measuring the amount of radionuclides in effluents during normal operations and under accident conditions must be provided for these systems. A means of measuring the flow of the diluting medium, either air or water, must also be provided.
( 2 ) Areas containing radioactive materials must be provided with systems for measuring the direct radiation levels in and around these areas.
( d ) *Effluent control.* The ISFSI or MRS must be designed to provide means to limit to levels as low as is reasonably achievable the release of radioactive materials in effluents during normal operations; and control the release of radioactive materials under accident conditions. Analyses must be made to show that releases to the general environment during normal operations and anticipated occurrences will be within the exposure limit given in § 72.104. Analyses of design basis accidents must be made to show that releases to the general environment will be within the exposure limits given in § 72.106. Systems designed to monitor the release of radioactive materials must have means for calibration and testing their operability.
§ 766.103 Special Assessment invoices. ( a ) DOE shall issue annually a Special Assessment invoice to each domestic utility. This invoice will specify itemized quantities of enrichment services by reactor. In each Special Assessment invoice, DOE shall require payment, on or before 30 days from the date of each invoice, of that utility's prorated share of the Baseline Total Annual Special Assessment, as adjusted for inflation using the most recently published monthly CPI-U data.
( b ) DOE shall enclose with the Fiscal Year 1993 Special Assessment invoice a sealed, business confidential, summary SWU transaction statement including: ( 1 ) TESS information which documents, by reactor, the basis of the utility's assessment;
( 2 ) A list of domestic utilities subject to the Special Assessment;
( 3 ) The total number of SWUs purchased from DOE by all domestic utilities for all purposes prior to October 24, 1992.
( 4 ) The total number of SWUs purchased from DOE for all purposes prior to October 24, 1992, including SWUs purchased or produced for defense purposes; and
( 5 ) Such other information as may be appropriate.
( c ) With regard to any fiscal year after Fiscal Year 1993, DOE shall enclose a summary SWU transaction statement with Special Assessment invoices that will include updated information regarding adjustments to Special Assessments resulting from the reconciliation and appeals process under Section 766.104.
( d ) The date of each Annual Special Assessment invoicing will be set on or about October 1 with payment due 30 calendar days from the date of invoice starting with the Fiscal Year 1995 Special Assessment.
ANNUAL COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

RE:	PE5 – SEQUOIA 2013-4

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association, as Servicer, pursuant to the Agreement, does hereby certify that:

(1)	A review of the activities of the Servicer between May 1, 2023 to December 31, 2023 and of the performance of the Servicer under the Agreement has been made under my supervision; and

 

(2)	To the best of my knowledge, based on such review for purposes of Regulation AB, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout such year, except as otherwise provided in the Servicer’s applicable Form 1122 filing.

JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.

Date: 2/28/2024

By: /s/ Michelle Silwonuk

Name:	Michelle Silwonuk

Title:	Managing Director

1

 

----
§ 820.10 Office of the docketing clerk. ( a ) *Docket.* The Docketing Clerk shall maintain a docket for enforcement actions commencing with the issuance of a Preliminary Notice of Violation, interpretations issued pursuant to subpart D of this part, exemptions issued pursuant to subpart E of this part, and any other matters designated by the Secretary. A docket for an enforcement action shall contain all documents required to be filed in the proceeding.
( b ) *Public inspection.* Subject to the provisions of law restricting the public disclosure of certain information, any person may, during Department business hours, inspect and copy any document filed with the Docketing Clerk. The cost of duplicating documents shall be borne by the person seeking copies of such documents. The DOE Official may waive this cost in appropriate cases.
( c ) *Transcript.* Except as otherwise provided in this part, after the filing of a Preliminary Notice of Violation, all hearings, conferences, and other meetings in the enforcement process shall be transcribed verbatim. A copy of the transcript shall be filed with the Docketing Clerk promptly. The Docketing Clerk shall serve all participants with notice of the availability of the transcript and shall furnish the participants with a copy of the transcript upon payment of the cost of reproduction, unless a participant can show that the cost is unduly burdensome.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

This notice corrects a notice (FR Doc. 2010-32092) published on page 80501 of the issue for Wednesday, December 22, 2010.

Under the Federal Reserve Bank of New York heading, the entry for Chuo Mitsui Trust Holding, Inc., Tokyo, Japan, is revised to read as follows:

A. Federal Reserve Bank of New York (Ivan Hurwitz, Vice President) 33 Liberty Street, New York, New York 10045-0001:

                    1.                     *Chuo Mitsui Trust Holdings, Inc.,*                     Tokyo, Japan; to become a bank holding Company by acquiring The Sumitomo Trust and Banking Co., Ltd, Osaka, Japan, and thereby acquire Sumitomo Trust and Banking Co. (USA), Hoboken, New Jersey.                

In connection with this application, Applicant also has applied to acquire Nikko Americas Holding Co., Inc., Nikko Asset Management Americas, Inc., and Chuo Mitsui Investments, all in New York, New York, and thereby engage in investment advisory activities, pursuant to section 225.24(b)(6) of Regulation Y.

Comments on this application must be received by January 18, 2011.

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, December 22, 2010.

Robert deV. Frierson,

Deputy Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2010-32593 Filed 12-27-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
###### Editorial Note on Part 51

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 51 appear at 80 FR 74980, Dec. 1, 2015.

#### § 51.94 Requirement to consider final environmental impact statement.

The final environmental impact statement, together with any comments and any supplement, will accompany the application or petition for rulemaking through, and be considered in, the Commission's decisionmaking process. The final environmental impact statement, together with any comments and any supplement, will be made a part of the record of the appropriate adjudicatory or rulemaking proceeding.