alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 435.4 Energy efficiency performance standard. ( a ) ( 1 ) All Federal agencies shall design new Federal buildings that are low-rise residential buildings, for which design for construction began on or after January 3, 2007, but before August 10, 2012, to: ( i ) Meet the IECC 2004 (incorporated by reference, see § 435.3), and
( ii ) If life-cycle cost-effective, achieve energy consumption levels, calculated consistent with paragraph (b) of this section, that are at least 30 percent below the levels of the IECC Baseline Building 2004.
( 2 ) All Federal agencies shall design new Federal buildings that are low-rise residential buildings, for which design for construction began on or after August 10, 2012, but before January 10, 2018 to: ( i ) Meet the IECC 2009 (incorporated by reference, see § 435.3), and
( ii ) If life-cycle cost-effective, achieve energy consumption levels, calculated consistent with paragraph (b) of this section, that are at least 30 percent below the levels of the IECC Baseline Building 2009.
( 3 ) All Federal agencies shall design new Federal buildings that are low-rise residential buildings, for which design for construction began on or after January 10, 2018, but before April 5, 2023 to: ( i ) Meet the IECC 2015, (incorporated by reference, see § 435.3), including the mandatory mechanical ventilation requirements in Section R403.6 of the IECC 2015; and
( ii ) If life-cycle cost-effective, achieve energy consumption levels, calculated consistent with paragraph (b) of this section, that are at least 30 percent below the levels of the IECC Baseline Building 2015.
( 4 ) All Federal agencies shall design new Federal buildings that are low-rise residential buildings, for which design for construction began on or after April 5, 2023 to: ( i ) Meet the IECC 2021, (incorporated by reference, see § 435.3); and
( ii ) If life-cycle cost-effective, achieve energy consumption levels, calculated consistent with paragraph (b) of this section, that are at least 30 percent below the levels of the IECC Baseline Building 2021.
( b ) ( 1 ) For new Federal low-rise residential buildings whose design for construction began before January 10, 2018, energy consumption for the purposes of calculating the 30 percent savings shall include space heating, space cooling, and domestic water heating.
( 2 ) For new Federal low-rise residential buildings whose design for construction began on or after before January 10, 2018, energy consumption for the purposes of calculating the 30 percent savings shall include space heating, space cooling, lighting, mechanical ventilation, and domestic water heating.
( c ) If a 30 percent reduction is not life-cycle cost-effective, the design of the proposed building shall be modified so as to achieve an energy consumption level at or better than the maximum level of energy efficiency that is life-cycle cost-effective, but at a minimum complies with paragraph (a) of this section.
[71 FR 70283, Dec. 4, 2006, as amended at 72 FR 72571, Dec. 21, 2007; 76 FR 49285, Aug. 10, 2011; 82 FR 2867, Jan. 10, 2017; 87 FR 19613, Apr. 5, 2022]
§ 1136.215 Records for program income earned after the end of the performance period. ( a ) *OMB guidance.* OMB guidance in 2 CFR 200.333(e) provides the retention period for records related to program income earned under a grant or cooperative agreement after the end of the period of performance, if an agency establishes requirements governing the disposition of program income earned after that time.
( b ) *DoD implementation.* A DoD Component's general terms and conditions should not establish retention requirements for records related to program income earned after the end of the period of performance. Retention requirements for those records in general terms and conditions would be inconsistent with the statement in 2 CFR 1128.725 that a DoD Component should rarely, if ever, establish a requirement for a recipient to be accountable for program income earned after the end of the period of performance. Section 1128.725 provides for use of general terms and conditions wording in FMS Article VII that establishes no such requirement. Section 1128.725 further states that exceptions for individual awards are properly addressed at the time of award in the award-specific terms and conditions.
( c ) *Award terms and conditions.* A DoD Component's general terms and conditions must use the wording appendix B to this part provides for Section C of OAR Article II. If a DoD Component includes a requirement in the award-specific terms and conditions for the recipient to be accountable for program income earned after the end of the period of performance, it also may include a requirement in the award-specific terms and conditions for the recipient's retention of the associated records.
J

- S47032

- 16

NON - PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 DEUTSCHE BANK NATION AL TRUST CO., AS TRUSTEE OF RESIDE NTIAL ASSET SECURITIZATION TRUST 2006

- A214CB MORTGAGE PASS

- THROUGH CERTIFICATES SERIES 2006

- N UNDER POOLING & SERVICING AGREEMENT DATED AS OF 10/1/06 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Appellee

v.

ROBERT KEELER Appellant No. 1534 MDA 2015

Appeal from the Order Entered August 10 , 2015 In the Court of Common Pleas of Franklin County Civil Division at No(s): 2008

- 1211

BEFORE: SHOGAN, J., LAZARUS, J., and JENKINS, J. JUDGMENT ORDER BY LAZARUS, J.: FILED JULY 06, 2016 Robert Keeler appeals from the order of the Court of Common Pleas of Franklin County that denied his petition to set aside a sheriff’s sale. For the following reasons, we dismiss the appeal.

Keeler’s pro se brief fails to comply with almost all applicable Pennsylvania Rules of Appellate Procedure. Pa.R.A.P. 2101 provides that where defects in the appellant’s brief or reproduced record are substantial, the appeal may be dismissed. Here, Keeler did not file a reproduced record nor did he file an application seeking to be excused from producing one.

See Pa.R.A.P. 2151(d).J

- S47032

- 16

- 2

-

Furthermore, Pa.R.A.P. 2117 requires a statement of the form of action followed by a brief procedural history, a brief history of any prior determination in the same case, the names of the judges whose

determinations are to be rev iewed and a condensed chronological statement of the facts. Instead, Keeler’s brief contains an introductory note, a reference to the trial court’s Pa.R.A.P. 1925(a) opinion, a statement of two general issues and a discussion of the grant of summary judgm ent entered more than five years ago. Keeler’s brief fails to include a summary of argument, see Pa.R.A.P. 2118. The argument section fails to comply with Pa.R.A.P. 2119 in that it consists of 28 numbered paragraphs with no clear connection or referenc e to the record. While the brief contains references to four cases, only one is a published decision, and it is from a federal bankruptcy court. Accordingly, none of the cases has precedential value in this Court.

Keeler’s brief contains no table of cont ents, see Pa.R.A.P. 2174(a), and no table of citations, see Pa.R.A.P. 2174(b). Finally, because Keeler’s brief fails to explain why the trial court abused its discretion in denying his petition to set aside the sheriff’s sale, we are unable to engage in m eaningful review. See Branch Banking & Trust

v. Gesiorski , 904 A.2d 939 (Pa. Super. 2009) (dismissal appropriate where

numerous defects in pro se brief prevented court from conducting meaningful appellate review). Appeal dismissed.J

- S47032

- 16

- 3

-

Judgment Entered.

Joseph D. Seletyn, Esq. Prothonotary

Date: 7/6/2016
#### In the Matter of Barton Baker, an Attorney, Respondent. Monroe County Bar Association, Petitioner.

Motion for reargument or reduction of penalty imposed denied; motion granted and stay continued until the opening of the term of the Court of Appeals commencing September 21, 1970. (2 motions.) Present— Del Vecchio, J. P., Marsh, Witmer, Bastow and Henry, JJ.
#### § 1400.862 When does a contested proposed debarment action include a fact-finding proceeding?

Fact-finding to resolve genuine disputes over facts material to the proposed debarment occurs where the conditions at 2 CFR 180.830(b) are satisfied.
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      I, Thian Hoo Tan, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report of Komag, Incorporated on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended
October 3, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such
Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and
results of operations of Komag, Incorporated.

                                            BY: /s/ Thian Hoo Tan
                                                --------------------------------

                                            Thian Hoo Tan
                                            Chief Executive Officer

      I, Kathleen A. Bayless, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Quarterly Report of Komag, Incorporated on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period
ended October 3, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in
such 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and
results of operations of Komag, Incorporated.

                                            BY: /s/ Kathleen A. Bayless
                                                --------------------------------

                                            Kathleen A. Bayless
                                            Chief Financial Officer

      This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the
extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by Komag, Incorporated for purposes
of Section 18 of the Security Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Komag, Incorporated and will be retained by Komag, Incorporated and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Kansas**

**Kansas 07 Jewell**
Exhibit
33.2



MANAGEMENT’S REPORT
ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH SEC
REGULATION AB SERVICING CRITERIA



Union
Bank, N.A. (the “Bank”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of UnionBanCal Corporation, provides
this assessment of compliance with the following applicable servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB promulgated
by the Securities and Exchange Commission. Management has determined that the servicing criteria are applicable in regards to the
servicing platform for the period as follows:



Platform:The retail installment contracts for Honda Auto Receivables 2013-1 Owner Trust (the
“Platform”).



Applicable
Servicing Criteria:  All servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d), to the extent required in the related transaction agreements
or required by the Item 1122(d) servicing criteria in regards to the activities performed by the Bank, except for the following
criteria:1122(d) 1(i), 1(ii), 1(iii),1(iv), 2(i), 2(iii),2(iv), 2(v), 2(vi),
2(vii), 3(i), 4(i), 4(ii), 4(iii), 4(iv), 4(v), 4(vi), 4(vii), 4(viii), 4(ix),4(x), 4(xi), 4(xii), 4(xiii), 4(xiv), and 4(xv),
which management has determined are not applicable to the activities the Bank performs with respect to the Platform (the “Applicable
Servicing Criteria”).



Period:  As of March 31, 2014 and for the period from April 1, 2013 to March
31, 2014 (the “Period”).



With respect to the Platform
and the Period, the Bank provides the following assessment of compliance with respect to the Applicable Servicing Criteria:



| | 1. | The Bank is responsible for assessing its compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The Bank has assessed compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria, as described above as
of and for the Period. In performing this assessment, management has used the criteria set by the Securities and Exchange Commission
in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 3. | The Bank was in compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of and for the Period in all
material respects.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Deloitte and Touche LLP, an independent registered
public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report with respect to the Bank’s foregoing assessment of compliance as
of and for the Period.

UNION BANK, N.A.



|By: | /s/ David Ursa | 
|--- | -------------- | 



|David Ursa            |  | 
|--------------------- |  | 
|Senior Vice President |  | 



|By: | /s/ Valerie Crain | 
|--- | ----------------- | 



|Valerie Crain              |  | 
|-------------------------- |  | 
|Vice President and Manager |  | 





May 28, 2014
§ 5.425 Counseling and use of appraisal and counseling materials. ( a ) *Counseling.* A recipient shall not discriminate against any person on the basis of sex in the counseling or guidance of students or applicants for admission.
( b ) *Use of appraisal and counseling materials.* A recipient that uses testing or other materials for appraising or counseling students shall not use different materials for students on the basis of their sex or use materials that permit or require different treatment of students on such basis unless such different materials cover the same occupations and interest areas and the use of such different materials is shown to be essential to eliminate sex bias. Recipients shall develop and use internal procedures for ensuring that such materials do not discriminate on the basis of sex. Where the use of a counseling test or other instrument results in a substantially disproportionate number of members of one sex in any particular course of study or classification, the recipient shall take such action as is necessary to assure itself that such disproportion is not the result of discrimination in the instrument or its application.
( c ) *Disproportion in classes.* Where a recipient finds that a particular class contains a substantially disproportionate number of individuals of one sex, the recipient shall take such action as is necessary to assure itself that such disproportion is not the result of discrimination on the basis of sex in counseling or appraisal materials or by counselors.
2007-2030.

#### State v. Sessler.

Crawford App. No. 3-06-23, 2007-Ohio-4931. Discretionary appeal accepted and cause consolidated with 2007-2426, *State v. Sessler,*Crawford App. No. 3-06-23, 2007-Ohio-4931.

O’Connor, J., dissents.
sourceTypeID isLeapYear monthID monthVMTFraction 11 Y 1 0.0729041 11 Y 2 0.072023 11 Y 3 0.0815285 11 Y 4 0.0820979 11 Y 5 0.0872855 11 Y 6 0.0880524 11 Y 7 0.0920958 11 Y 8 0.0931976 11 Y 9 0.0844703 11 Y 10 0.0863011 11 Y 11 0.080029 11 Y 12 0.0800148 21 Y 1 0.0729041 21 Y 2 0.072023 21 Y 3 0.0815285 21 Y 4 0.0820979 21 Y 5 0.0872855 21 Y 6 0.0880524 21 Y 7 0.0920958 21 Y 8 0.0931976 21 Y 9 0.0844703 21 Y 10 0.0863011 21 Y 11 0.080029 21 Y 12 0.0800148 31 Y 1 0.0729041 31 Y 2 0.072023 31 Y 3 0.0815285 31 Y 4 0.0820979 31 Y 5 0.0872855 31 Y 6 0.0880524 31 Y 7 0.0920958 31 Y 8 0.0931976 31 Y 9 0.0844703 31 Y 10 0.0863011 31 Y 11 0.080029 31 Y 12 0.0800148 32Y 1 0.0729041 32Y 2 0.072023 32Y 3 0.0815285 32Y 4 0.0820979 32Y 5 0.0872855 32Y 6 0.0880524 32Y 7 0.0920958 32Y 8 0.0931976 32Y 9 0.0844703 32Y 10 0.0863011 32Y 11 0.080029 32Y 12 0.0800148 41 Y 1 0.0729041 41 Y 2 0.072023 41 Y 3 0.081528541 Y 4 0.0820979 41 Y 5 0.0872855 41 Y 6 0.0880524 41 Y 7 0.0920958 41 Y 8 0.0931976 41 Y 9 0.0844703 41 Y 10 0.0863011 41 Y 11 0.080029 41 Y 12 0.0800148 42Y 1 0.0729041 42Y 2 0.072023 42Y 3 0.0815285 42Y 4 0.0820979 42Y 5 0.0872855 42Y 6 0.0880524 42Y 7 0.0920958 42Y 8 0.0931976 42Y 9 0.0844703 42Y 10 0.0863011 42Y 11 0.080029 42Y 12 0.0800148 43Y 1 0.0729041 43Y 2 0.072023 43Y 3 0.0815285 43Y 4 0.0820979 43Y 5 0.0872855 43Y 6 0.0880524 43Y 7 0.0920958 43Y 8 0.0931976 43Y 9 0.0844703 43Y 10 0.0863011 43Y 11 0.080029 43Y 12 0.0800148 51 Y 1 0.0729041 51 Y 2 0.072023 51 Y 3 0.0815285 51 Y 4 0.0820979 51 Y 5 0.0872855 51 Y 6 0.0880524 51 Y 7 0.0920958 51 Y 8 0.0931976 51 Y 9 0.0844703 51 Y 10 0.0863011 51 Y 11 0.080029 51 Y 12 0.0800148 52Y 1 0.0729041 52Y 2 0.072023 52Y 3 0.0815285 52Y 4 0.0820979 52Y 5 0.0872855 52Y 6 0.0880524 52Y 7 0.092095852Y 8 0.0931976 52Y 9 0.0844703 52Y 10 0.0863011 52Y 11 0.080029 52Y 12 0.0800148 53Y 1 0.0729041 53Y 2 0.072023 53Y 3 0.0815285 53Y 4 0.0820979 53Y 5 0.0872855 53Y 6 0.0880524 53Y 7 0.0920958 53Y 8 0.0931976 53Y 9 0.0844703 53Y 10 0.0863011 53Y 11 0.080029 53Y 12 0.0800148 54Y 1 0.0729041 54Y 2 0.072023 54Y 3 0.0815285 54Y 4 0.0820979 54Y 5 0.0872855 54Y 6 0.0880524 54Y 7 0.0920958 54Y 8 0.0931976 54Y 9 0.0844703 54Y 10 0.0863011 54Y 11 0.080029 54Y 12 0.0800148 61 Y 1 0.0729041 61 Y 2 0.072023 61 Y 3 0.0815285 61 Y 4 0.0820979 61 Y 5 0.0872855 61 Y 6 0.0880524 61 Y 7 0.0920958 61 Y 8 0.0931976 61 Y 9 0.0844703 61 Y 10 0.0863011 61 Y 11 0.080029 61 Y 12 0.0800148 62Y 1 0.0729041 62Y 2 0.072023 62Y 3 0.0815285 62Y 4 0.0820979 62Y 5 0.0872855 62Y 6 0.0880524 62Y 7 0.0920958 62Y 8 0.0931976 62Y 9 0.0844703 62Y 10 0.0863011 62Y 11 0.08002962Y 12 0.0800148
#### In the Matter of Leopold Siao-Pao, Appellant, v New York State Board of Parole, Appeals Unit, Respondent.

[813 NYS2d 658]

Appeal from order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Marcy Friedman, J.), entered April 12, 2005, which denied petitioner’s application to annul respondent’s August 2004 denial of petitioner’s August 2003 parole application, and dismissed the petition, unanimously dismissed as moot, without costs.

The appeal has been rendered moot because petitioner appeared before the Parole Board in August 2005 and received another hearing *(Matter of Siao-Pao v Travis,*5 AD3d 150 [2004], *354
      *lv denied*3 NY3d 603 [2004]). In any event, we find that respondent properly considered the factors set forth in Executive Law § 259-i, including such pertinent documents as the presentence report and victim impact statement. Concur—Andrias, J.P., Sullivan, Williams, Sweeny and McGuire, JJ.
Editorial Note on Part 2
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

§ 2.401 Notice of hearing on construction permit or combined license applications pursuant to appendix N of 10 CFR parts 50 or 52. ( a ) In the case of applications pursuant to appendix N of part 50 of this chapter for construction permits for nuclear power reactors of the type described in § 50.22 of this chapter, or applications pursuant to appendix N of part 52 of this chapter for combined licenses, the Secretary will issue notices of hearing pursuant to § 2.104.
( b ) The notice of hearing will also state the time and place of the hearings on any separate phase of the proceeding.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM BODDIE-NOELL
PROPERTIES, INC. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH
31, 1997, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           1,036,282
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       17,941
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,598,832
<PP&E>                                         109,947,833
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (12,100,572)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 103,679,638
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,319,445
<BONDS>                                         77,581,765
<COMMON>                                            31,030
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<OTHER-SE>                                      24,747,398
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   103,679,638
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,852,615
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,472,916
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   371,773
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,537,143
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    470,783
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                470,783
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                       470,783
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         0.15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0.15
        


</TABLE>
§ 1132.305 Administrative requirements. ( a ) *Requirement.* A DoD Component's general terms and conditions must require recipients to include in their contracts standard administrative requirements related to remedies, termination, allowable costs, rights in copyrights and data, records access and retention, and reporting.
( b ) *Award terms and conditions.* To implement the requirement described in paragraph (a) of this section, a DoD Component's general terms and conditions must use the wording that appendix C to this part provides for Section A of PROC Article III.