alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## Breadcrumb

-  National Minerals Information Center 

#           The Mineral Industry of South Dakota      

      By National Minerals Information Center

-  Home 
-  Commodities 
-  Countries 
-  Materials Flow 
-  US States 
-  NMIC Seminars 
-  Data 
-  Multimedia 
-  Publications 
-  News 
-  Connect 
-  About 

Statistics and information on the nonfuel mineral commodities produced in South Dakota

### Minerals Yearbook Vol. II - Domestic

2018-2019 data for South Carolina are summarized in the table on this web page. The 2015 chapter data tables (XLS) and 2014 chapter containing text and data tables in PDF and XLS formats are available, with other years, through the links below.

### Sources of information

South Dakota leads in mica production It also produces construction sand and gravel, crushed stone, dimension stone, feldspar, gemstones, gold, gypsum, industrial sand and gravel, lime, and silver. Iron ore mined is used for cement clinker.

                        - Statistical Summary
                        - Aggregates Data by State, Type, and End Use
                        - Mineral Commodity Summaries
                        - Mineral Industry Surveys
                        - Minerals Yearbook Volume I -- Metals and Minerals
                        - Mineral Yearbook Volume II - South Dakota chapters

The following data table gives nonfuel mineral commodity production data for South Dakota extracted from Table 5 in the 2019 Minerals Yearbook Statistical Summary.

rRevised. XX Not applicable.

1Includes data from the commodity chapters published in the Minerals Yearbook as they were completed and released through June 2022.

2Production as measured by mine shipments, sales, or marketable production (including consumption by producers).

3Data are rounded to no more than three significant digits; may not add to totals shown.

4Withheld to avoid disclosing company proprietary data.

5Recoverable content of ores and concentrates.

### **Minerals Yearbook Volume II South Dakota chapters:**

*Subscribe to receive an email notification when a publication is added to this page*.
                            - Minerals Yearbook:  The Mineral Industry of South Dakota   	  PDF Format:   	     |  1994  |  1995  |  1996  |  1997  |  1998  |  1999  |  2000  |  2001  |  2002  |  2003  |  2004  |  2005  |  2006  |  2007  |  2008  |  2009  |  2010-2011  |  2012-2013  |  2014  |    	  XLS Format:   	     |  2002  |  2003  |  2004  |  2005  |  2006  |  2007  |  2008  |  2009  |  2010-2011  |  2012-2013  |  2014  |  2015 tables-only release  |
                            - Archive   	     |  1932-1993  |

### Links

                            - South Dakota Geological Survey
                            - South Dakota Department of Natural Resources, Minerals and Mining Program
                            - Association of American State Geologists
                            - USGS Publications Warehouse (search by State)

### Contacts

#### Robert M Callaghan

##### Mineral Commodity Specialist - States

National Minerals Information Center

rcallaghan@usgs.gov

703-648-7709
2808.802 Policy.       The Director, Facilities and Administrative Services Staff (FASS), JMD, has been designated to serve as the central printing authority for the DOJ, for purposes of FAR 8.802(b).    **Parent topic:** Subpart 2808.8 - Acquisition of Printing and Related Supplies
# EUR-Lex - 31987D0168 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31987D0168

**87/168/EEC: Commission Decision of 23 February 1987 amending Decision 86/473/EEC as regards the list of establishments in Uruguay approved for the purpose of importing meat products into the Community **

*
Official Journal L 068 , 12/03/1987 P. 0029 - 0030 *

*****

COMMISSION DECISION

of 23 February 87

amending Decision 86/473/EEC as regards the list of establishments in Uruguay approved for the purpose of importing meat products into the Community

(87/168/EEC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community,

Having regard to Council Directive 77/99/EEC of 21 December 1976 on health problems affecting intra-Community trade in meat products (1), as last amended by Directive 86/469/EEC (2), and in particular Article 17(1) thereof,

Whereas a list of establishments in Uruguay, approved for the purpose of importing meat products into the Community, was drawn up initially by Commission Decision 86/473/EEC (3);

Whereas a Community on-the-spot visit to meat products establishments in Uruguay has revealed that the level of hygiene in one establishment has altered since the last inspection; whereas the list of establishments should be amended accordingly;

Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Veterinary Committee,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The Annex to Decision 86/473/EEC is replaced by the Annex to this Decision.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 23 February 1987.

For the Commission

Frans ANDRIESSEN

Vice-President

(1) OJ No L 26, 31. 12. 1977, p. 85.

(2) OJ No L 275, 26. 9. 1986, p. 36.

(3) OJ No L 279, 30. 9. 1986, p. 53.

ANNEX

LIST OF ESTABLISHMENTS FROM WHICH IMPORTS OF MEAT PRODUCTS MAY BE AUTHORIZED WITHOUT A TIME LIMIT

1.2.3 // // // // Approval No // Establishment // Address // // // // 2 (1) // Frigorífico Colonia // Tarariras, Colonia // 8 (2) // Frigorífico Canelones // Canelones, Canelones // // //

(1) Frozen cooked bovine meat which is cooked to a centre temperature of at least 80 °C only.

(2) Fully heat treated canned bovine meat only.

LIST OF ESTABLISHMENTS FROM WHICH MEAT PRODUCTS MAY BE INTRODUCED INTO THE TERRITORY OF THE COMMUNITY ONLY UNTIL THE STATED DATE

1.2.3 // // // // Approval No // Establishment // Address // // // // 35 (1) (2) // Delta Brands Uruguay // Pando, Canelones // // //

(1) Fully heat treated canned bovine meat only.

(2) Until 31 July 1987.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

OFFICE OF THE CLERK

POST OFFICE BOX 711

MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA 36101-0711

DEBRA P. HACKETT, CLERK

TELEPHONE (334) 954-3600

November 1, 2006

NOTICE OF NON-COMPLIANCE

To: ALL COUNSEL OF RECORD

Case Style: Burkett v. McCray et al 

Case Number: 1:06-cv-00775-DRB

Referenced Pleading: Rule 26(A)(1) Initial Disclosures

 (Erroneously entered as a status report)

Docket Entry Number: 25

The referenced pleading was electronically filed on ***October 31, 2006*** in this case and

is not in compliance with the local rules and/or administrative procedures of this court. 

******This pleading is discovery and is not allowed pursuant to Local Rule 5.1 NON-FILING

OF CIVIL DISCOVERY.

The pleading is hereby STRICKEN from the record and the parties are instructed to disregard

the entry of this pleading on the court’s docket. Parties should be aware that the striking of

this entry does not affect their responsibilities as to the discovery process.

Case 1:06-cv-00775-TFM Document 26 Filed 11/01/2006 Page 1 of 1
Editorial Note on Part 712
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 712 appear at 88 FR 41292, June 26, 2023.

§ 712.25 Cooperation by the individual. ( a ) It is the responsibility of the HRP candidate or HRP certified individual to provide full, frank, and truthful answers to relevant and material questions, and when requested, furnish, or authorize others to furnish, information that DOE deems pertinent to reach a decision regarding HRP certification or recertification. This obligation to cooperate applies at any stage, including but not limited to initial certification, recertification, temporary removal, revocation, and/or hearing. The individual or candidate may elect not to cooperate; however, such refusal may prevent DOE from reaching an affirmative finding required for granting or continuing HRP certification. In this event, any HRP certification then in effect may be revoked, or, for HRP candidates, may not be granted.
( b ) An HRP certified individual who receives notification of the Manager's decision to revoke his or her certification due to failure to cooperate may choose one of the following options: ( 1 ) Take no action; or
( 2 ) Within 20 working days after the individual received notice of the Manager's revocation decision, submit a written request by certified mail to the Manager for reconsideration. The request must include the individual's response to the information that gave rise to the revocation decision.
( c ) Upon receipt of the request for reconsideration, the Manager shall notify the individual, in writing, within 20 calendar days of receipt of the written appeal, as to whether the action to revoke certification was appropriate. If the Manager determines that the action was inappropriate, he or she shall reverse revocation.
ANNUAL STATEMENT AS TO COMPLIANCE

UBS-Barclays Commercial Mortgage Trust
2013-C5

The undersigned, David Co, a Director of Deutsche Bank Trust Company
Americas, as the Certificate Administrator (a “Certifying Servicer”) under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated
as of February 1, 2013 (the “Agreement”), by and among, UBS Commercial Mortgage Securitization Corp., as Depositor,
Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC
Bank, National Association, as Special Servicer, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Trustee, Certificate Administrator, Paying
Agent and Custodian, and Situs Holdings, LLC, as Operating Advisor here by certifies in accordance with Section 10.11 of the Agreement:



| | A) | A review of such Certifying Servicer’s activities from January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2017 (the “reporting period”)
and of such Certifying Servicer’s performance under the Agreement has been made under such officer’s supervision and
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | B) | That, as to the best of such officer’s knowledge, based on such review, such Certifying Servicer has fulfilled all its
obligations under the Agreement, in all material respects throughout the reporting period.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS

as Certificate Administrator



/s/ David Co

BY: David Co

Title: Director

Date: March 1, 2018
# EUR-Lex - 31985D0620 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31985D0620

**85/620/EEC: Commission Decision of 13 December 1985 amending, because of the accession of Spain and Portugal, Decision 79/491/EEC laying down a code and standard rules for the transcription into a machine-readable form of the data of the basic surveys of areas under vines **

*
Official Journal L 379 , 31/12/1985 P. 0001 - 0011 Finnish special edition: Chapter 3 Volume 20 P. 0082 Spanish special edition: Chapter 03 Volume 40 P. 0128 Swedish special edition: Chapter 3 Volume 20 P. 0082 Portuguese special edition Chapter 03 Volume 40 P. 0128 *

COMMISSION DECISION of 13 December 1985 amending, because of the accession of Spain and Portugal, Decision 79/491/EEC laying down a code and standard rules for the transcription into a machine-readable form of the data of the basic surveys of areas under vines (85/620/EEC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community, Having regard to the Act of Accession of Spain and Portugal, and in particular Article 396 thereof, Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 357/79 of 5 February 1979 on statistical surveys of areas under vines (1), as last amended by Council Regulation (EEC) No 3719/81 (2), and in particular Article 4 (4) thereof, Whereas the accession of Spain and Portugal, necessitates the amending of Commission Decision 79/491/EEC (3); Whereas pursuant to Article 2 (3) of the Treaty of Accession the institutions of the Community may adopt before accession the measures referred to in Article 396 of the Act, such measures entering into force subject to and on the date of the entry into force of that Treaty, HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Subject to the entry into force of the Treaty of Accession of Spain and Portugal, the Annexes I, II and III to Decision 79/491/EEC are hereby replaced by the Annexes to this Decision.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 13 December 1985. For the Commission Alois PFEIFFER Member of the Commission

(1) OJ No L 54, 5. 3. 1979, p. 124.

(2) OJ No L 373, 29. 12. 1981, p. 5.

(3) OJ No L 129, 28. 5. 1979, p. 9.
#### The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v Anibal Rosario, Respondent.

The People appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated June 26, 1979, which, *inter alia,*granted defendant’s motion to dismiss the indictment, with leave to resubmit. Order affirmed. We agree with Criminal Term that the instructions given the Grand Jury were insufficient, prejudicial and a denial to the defendant of due process. We also agree that the third count of the indictment, criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, was insufficient on its face as it failed to include a material element of the crime charged (see Penal Law, § 265.02, subd *[4];People v Iannone,*45 NY2d 589, 600-601). However, contrary to Criminal Term, we hold-that the evidence before the Grand Jury was sufficient to establish a prima facie case for the crime of criminally negligent homicide (CPL 190.65, subd 1; *People v Peetz,*7 NY2d 147). The defendant observed the decedent produce a gun and wave it in the faces of those gathered in a room of an apartment. He watched as Juan Gomez took the gun from the decedent and removed the only bullet contained in the pistol. Although the defendant left the apartment for a period of time, upon his return he saw that Gomez still had the bullet. However, when the defendant left the room a second time, the decedent retrieved the bullet, reloaded the gun and began waving it about again. The defendant saw the decedent playing with the gun again and obtained it from him. As the defendant began to wave the gun around with his finger on the trigger it discharged killing the decedent. The defendant’s failure to ascertain whether the gun had been reloaded, when he saw the decedent again playing with the pistol, coupled with defendant’s handling of the weapon, created a risk of death that, if unexplained and uncontradicted, was substantial, unjustifiable and a gross deviation from the standard of care that a reasonable person would observe in the situation (see Penal Law, § 15.05, subd 4). The defendant’s failure to perceive this risk, makes *865out a prima facie case of criminally negligent homicide (Penal Law, § 125.10). As the Court of Appeals has stated “Although the discharge of the weapon may well have been unintentional, the jury was entitled to consider whether the risk created by defendants action was substantial, unjustifiable and constituted a gross deviation from the standard of conduct a reasonable person would have observed” *(People v Licitra,*47 NY2d 554, 559). Where, as here, a prima facie case has been made out for one count of the indictment, the general rule is to reinstate the entire indictment (see *People v Warner-Lambert Co.,*69 AD2d 265). However, in view of the many errors made during the charge and recharge to the Grand Jury, the indictment should be dismissed with leave to resubmit. Hopkins, J. P., Gulotta, Margett and O’Connor, JJ., concur.
# EUR-Lex - 31980R3478 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31980R3478

**Commission Regulation (EEC) No 3478/80 of 30 December 1980 amending various Regulations in the seeds sector as a result of Greek accession **

*
Official Journal L 363 , 31/12/1980 P. 0082 - 0082 Finnish special edition: Chapter 3 Volume 12 P. 0265 Greek special edition: Chapter 03 Volume 32 P. 0190 Swedish special edition: Chapter 3 Volume 12 P. 0265 Spanish special edition: Chapter 03 Volume 20 P. 0127 Portuguese special edition Chapter 03 Volume 20 P. 0127 *

COMMISSION REGULATION (EEC) No 3478/80 of 30 December 1980 amending various Regulations in the seeds sector as a result of Greek accession

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community,

Having regard to the Act of Accession of Greece (1), and in particular Article 146 (2) thereof,

Whereas, pursuant to Article 22 of the Act of Accession of Greece, the adaptations to the acts listed in Annex II to the said Act are to be drawn up in conformity with the guidelines set out in that Annex;

Whereas adaptations are also necessary in respect of acts adopted after signature of the Treaty of Accession, the validity of which extends beyond 1 January 1981;

Whereas in the seeds sector, it is necessary to add certain expressions in Greek to Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1445/76 of 22 June 1976 specifying the different varieties of Lolium perenne L (2), as last amended by Regulation (EEC) No 1501/80 (3), and to Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1119/79 of 6 June 1979 laying down special provisions for the implementation of the system of import licences for seeds (4), as amended by Regulation (EEC) No 1516/79 (5),

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Regulation (EEC) No 1445/76 is hereby amended as follows: >PIC FILE= "T0018275">

Article 2

In Article 6 (2) of Regulation (EEC) No 1119/79, the following terms are hereby added: >PIC FILE= "T0018276">

Article 3

This Regulation shall enter into force on 1 January 1981.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 30 December 1980.

For the Commission

Finn GUNDELACH

Vice-President

(1) OJ No L 291, 19.11.1979, p. 17. (2) OJ No L 161, 23.6.1976, p. 10. (3) OJ No L 149, 17.6.1980, p. 25. (4) OJ No L 139, 7.6.1979, p. 13. (5) OJ No L 184, 20.7.1979, p. 14.
# L_2015110EN.01004102.xml

| 29.4.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 110/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.4.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 110/41

---

Corrigendum to Regulation No 31 (EEC), 11 (EAEC), laying down the Staff Regulations of Officials and the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Economic Community and the European Atomic Energy Community

(
  Official Journal of the European Communities 45 of 14 June 1962
  )

(English Special Edition, Series I, Chapter 1959 to 1962, p. 135)

On page 147, Article 50, fifth paragraph:

for:

‘When the official's entitlement to the allowance ceases, he shall be entitled (...) to receive payment of pension under Article 9 of Annex VIII.’

read:

‘When the official's entitlement to the allowance ceases, he shall be entitled (...) to receive payment of pension without applying the reduction laid down in Article 9 of Annex VIII.’

---
MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-12-00285-CV

In the Interest of C.A.N. and R.A.N., III, Children

From the 37th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 1986-CI-22039

Honorable David A. Berchelmann, Jr., Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice

Delivered and Filed: August 29, 2012

DISMISSED 

Appellant Jessica Scott attempts to appeal from a final judgment signed on January 24, 

2012. For the following reasons, we dismiss this appeal.

The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provide that a notice of appeal must be filed 

within ninety days after the judgment is signed if any party timely files a motion for new trial. 

TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1(a)(1). The time to file a notice of appeal is extended if, within fifteen days 

after the deadline for filing the notice of appeal, an appellant files a notice of appeal and a 

motion for extension of time to file a notice of appeal. TEX. R. APP. P. 26.3. A motion for 

extension of time is necessarily implied when an appellant, acting in good faith, files a notice of 

appeal beyond the time allowed by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 26.1 but within the 
04-12-00285-CV

- 2 -

fifteen-day grace period provided by Rule 26.3 for filing a motion for extension of time. See 

Verburgt v. Dorner, 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997) (construing the predecessor to Rule 26). 

However, the appellant must offer a reasonable explanation for failing to file the notice of appeal 

in a timely manner. See id.; TEX. R. APP. P. 26.3, 10.5(b)(2)(A). 

Here, the trial court signed a final judgment on January 24, 2012. Appellant timely filed a 

motion for new trial on February 22, 2012. Therefore, the notice of appeal was due to be filed on 

April 23, 2012. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.1(a)(1). Appellant, however, did not file a notice of appeal 

until May 7, 2012. Although appellant filed a notice of appeal within the fifteen-day grace period 

allowed by Rule 26.3, she did not file a motion for extension of time to file a notice of appeal, 

which was due on May 8, 2012. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.3. 

We, therefore, ordered appellant to file a response presenting a reasonable explanation for 

failing to file a notice of appeal in a timely manner. We warned that if appellant failed to respond 

within the time provided, the appeal would be dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c). Appellant 

failed to respond. Therefore, this appeal is dismissed. Costs of appeal are taxed against appellant.

 PER CURIAM
**Indiana**

**Indiana 01 Greene**
###### Editorial Note on Part 72

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 72 appear at 80 FR 74981, Dec. 1, 2015, and at 81 FR 86910, Dec. 2, 2016.

#### § 72.130 Criteria for decommissioning.

The ISFSI or MRS must be designed for decommissioning. Provisions must be made to facilitate decontamination of structures and equipment, minimize the quantity of radioactive wastes and contaminated equipment, and facilitate the removal of radioactive wastes and contaminated materials at the time the ISFSI or MRS is permanently decommissioned.