alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 600.341 Monitoring and reporting program and financial performance. ( a ) The terms and conditions of the award prescribe the reporting requirements, the frequency, and the due dates for reports. At a minimum, requirements must include: ( 1 ) Periodic progress reports (at least annually, but no more frequently than quarterly) addressing both program status and business status, as follows: ( i ) The program portions of the reports must address progress toward achieving program performance goals and milestones, including current issues, problems, or developments.
( ii ) The business portions of the reports must provide summarized details on the status of resources (Federal funds and non-Federal cost sharing or matching), including an accounting of expenditures for the period covered by the report. The report should compare the resource status with any payment and expenditure schedules or plans provided in the original award, explain any major deviations from those schedules, and discuss actions that will be taken to address the deviations.
( 2 ) A final technical report if the award is for research and development.
( b ) If the contracting officer previously authorized advance payments, pursuant to § 600.312(a)(2), he/she should consult with the DOE project director and consider whether program progress reported in the periodic progress report, in relation to reported expenditures, is sufficient to justify continued authorization of advance payments.
§ 76.22 Ineligibility of certain applicants. A certificate of compliance may not be issued to the Corporation if the Commission determines that: ( a ) The Corporation is owned, controlled, or dominated by an alien, a foreign corporation, or a foreign government; or
( b ) The issuance of such a certificate of compliance would be inimical to— ( 1 ) The common defense and security of the United States; or
( 2 ) The maintenance of a reliable and economical domestic source of enrichment services.
[62 FR 6670, Feb. 12, 1997]
N OTE : This o rder is non precedential.



# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

DAVID MITCHELL, SR.,
Claimant

- Appellant,

v.

ROBERT A. MCDONALD, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, Respondent

- Appellee.

______________________

2014

- 7074

______________________

Appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for
Veterans Claims in No. 13

- 1814, Judge Mary J. Schoelen.

______________________

ON MOTION

______________________ O R D E R

David Mitchell, Sr. moves to withdraw his appeal.

Upon consideration thereof,

I T I S O RDERED T HAT :
(1) The motion is granted. The appeal is dismissed.

(2) Each side shall bear its own costs. Case: 14-7074 Document: 11 Page: 1 Filed: 08/13/2014MITCHELL v. MCDONALD 2

F OR THE C OURT

/s/ Daniel E. O’Toole
Daniel E. O’Toole
Clerk of Court

s21

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: August 13, 2014 Case: 14-7074 Document: 11 Page: 2 Filed: 08/13/2014
**Exhibit
      32.1**





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Patient Safety Technologies, Inc. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2005 as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
      I, Louis Glazer, M.D., Ph.G, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




February
              13, 2006
            
            /s/ Louis Glazer, M.D., Ph.GLouis
              Glazer, M.D., Ph.GChief
                Executive Officer
# PGI 237.102-74 Taxonomy for the acquisition of services and supplies & equipment.

Click here for OUSD(A&S) DPAP memorandum, “Taxonomy for the Acquisition of Services and Supplies & Equipment,” dated August 27, 2012. An Excel version of “Acquisition of Services and Supplies & Equipment Taxonomy” is available here.

**Parent topic:**PGI 237.102 Policy.
226 So.2d 924

#### Hollis E. MOORE and Clellie Balton Moore v. CENTRAL LOUISIANA ELECTRIC COMPANY, Inc., et al.

No. 50167.

Oct. 14, 1969.

In re: Hollis E. Moore and Clellie Balton Moore applying for writs of certiorari, mandamus and prohibition.

Application denied. This Court will not exercise its supervisory jurisdiction to review interlocutory orders or rulings of a trial court, save in cases of palpable error and only when irreparable injury will ensue. Relator has an adequate remedy by appeal in the event of an adverse judgment on the merits.
#### § 52.85 Administrative review of applications; hearings.

A proceeding on a combined license is subject to all applicable procedural requirements contained in 10 CFR part 2, including the requirements for docketing (§ 2.101 of this chapter) and issuance of a notice of hearing (§ 2.104 of this chapter). If an applicant requests a Commission finding on certain ITAAC with the issuance of the combined license, then those ITAAC will be identified in the notice of hearing. All hearings on combined licenses are governed by the procedures contained in 10 CFR part 2.
Exhibit 34.3b



LOGO

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Tothe Board of Directors of Assurant Inc.:

We have
examined managements assertion, included in the accompanying Report on Assessment of Compliance with §1122(d)(2)(vi), §1122(d)(4)(xi) and §1122(d)(4)(xii) of Regulation AB Servicing Criteria, that American Security Insurance
Company, Standard Guaranty Insurance Company and TrackSure Insurance Agency, Inc. (affiliates of Assurant, Inc., collectively the Company) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange
Commissions Regulation AB for the insurance escrow servicing activities it performs with respect to all mortgage backed securities transactions that were registered after January 1, 2006 with the Securities and Exchange Commission
pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933 (the Platform), as of December 31, 2016 and for the year then ended,excluding criteria §1122(d)(1)(i) through §1122(d)(1)(v), §1122(d)(2)(i) through §1122(d)(2)(v),
§1122(d)(2)(vii), §1122(d)(3)(i) through §1122(d)(3)(iv), §1122(d)(4)(i) through §1122(d)(4)(x) and §1122(d)(4)(xiii) through §1122(d)(4)(xv), which the Company has determined are not applicable to the activities
performed by it with respect to the Platform. Management is responsible for the Companys compliance with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on managements assertion based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly,
included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Companys compliance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of
selected servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company performed those selected activities in compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our procedures were limited to the servicing activities performed by
the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to detect noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurred prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated
or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Companys compliance with the
servicing criteria.

In our opinion, managements assertion that American Security Insurance Company, Standard Guaranty Insurance Company,
and TrackSure Insurance Agency, Inc. complied with the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016 for the Platform is fairly stated, in all material respects.



LOGO

February 15, 2017





PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, 1075 Peachtree Street,
Atlanta, GA 30309-3851

T: (678) 419 1000, www.pwc.com/us
###### Editorial Note on Part 725

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 725 appear at 88 FR 41292, June 26, 2023.

#### § 725.30 Exceptions and additional requirements.

Notwithstanding any other provision in the regulations in this part, the Director, Office of Environment, Health, Safety and Security may deny an application for an access permit or suspend or revoke any access permit, or incorporate additional conditions or requirements in any access permit, upon finding that such denial, revocation or the incorporation of such conditions and limitations is necessary or appropriate in the interest of the common defense and security or is otherwise in the public interest.

[41 FR 56778, Dec. 30, 1976, as amended at 71 FR 68732, Nov. 28, 2006; 88 FR 41292, June 26, 2023]
§ 600.10 Form and content of applications. ( a ) *General.* Applications shall be required for all financial assistance projects or programs.
( b ) *Forms.* Applications shall be on the form specified in a program rule, the program announcement, or these regulations. (See also §§ 600.112 and 600.210.) For unsolicited applications, a guide for preparation and submission is available from U.S. Department of Energy, Federal Energy Technology Center, Attn: Unsolicited Proposal Manager, Post Office Box 10940, Pittsburgh, PA, 15236-0940.
( c ) *Contents of an application.* In general, a financial assistance application shall include: ( 1 ) A facesheet containing basic identifying information. The facesheet shall be the Standard Form (SF)424;
( 2 ) A detailed narrative description of the proposed project, including the objectives of the project and the applicant's plan for carrying it out;
( 3 ) A budget with supporting justification; and
( d ) *Incomplete applications.* DOE may return an application that: ( 1 ) Is not signed, either in writing or electronically, by an official authorized to bind the applicant; or
( 2 ) Omits any information or documentation required by statute, program rule, or the solicitation, if the nature of the omission precludes review of the application.
( e ) *Supplemental information.* During the review of a complete application, DOE may request the submission of additional information only if the information is essential to evaluate the application.
( f ) Registration is required in the Central Contractor Registration (CCR) for all applications. Information on registration can be obtained at *http://www.ccr.gov/Grantees.aspx .*
[61 FR 7166, Feb. 26, 1996, as amended at 64 FR 56420, Oct. 20, 1999; 69 FR 7867, Feb. 20, 2004; 74 FR 44276, Aug. 28, 2009]
###### Editorial Note on Part 725

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 725 appear at 88 FR 41292, June 26, 2023.

#### § 725.27 Amendment.

An access permit may be amended from time to time upon application by the permittee. An application for amendment may be filed, in triplicate, in letter form and shall be signed by an individual authorized to sign on behalf of the applicant. The term of an access permit shall not be altered by an amendment thereto.
**EXHIBIT
32**
 
 **Certification
of Periodic Financial Report**
 **** **Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350**
 
 
 Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of Criticare
Systems, Inc. (the “Company”) certifies that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
of the Company for the period ended December 31, 2004 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
information contained in that Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
 
 
 
 Date:
February 11 ,
2005 /s/
Emil H.
Soika
 Emil H. Soika, Chief
Executive Officer
 
 
 
 Date:
February 11 ,
2005 /s/
Joel D.
Knudson
 Joel
D. Knudson, Vice President - Finance
 
 
 
 This
Certification is made solely for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject to
the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other
purpose.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Sandy Hook visitor programs**
 
SuDoc Number:I 29.96/5:
Item Number:0654-B-02 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000598072
 
2006 Fall | 2006-07 Winter
 
March 3, 2020
Order filed June 16, 2016

I n The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 16

- 00374

- CV

____________ MISHA FERGUSON ET AL , Appellant

V. QIAO ZHOU ET AL, Appellee

On Appeal from Co unty Civil C our t at Law No

. 4

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1073353



### O R D E R The notice of appeal in this case was filed May 4, 2016

. To date, the filing fee of $20 5.00 has not been paid. No evidence that appellants are excused by statute or the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure from paying costs has been filed. See Tex. R. App. P

. 5

. Therefore, the court issues the following order.
Appellant Misha Ferguson is ordered to pay th e filing fee in the amount of $20 5.00 to the c lerk of this court on or before June 27, 2016. See Tex. R. App. P. 5. If appellant fails to timely pay the filing fee in accordance with this order, the appeal
will be dismissed.

PER CURIAM
###### Editorial Note on Part 725

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 725 appear at 88 FR 41292, June 26, 2023.

#### § 725.13 Additional information.

The Director, Office of Environment, Health, Safety and Security may, at any time after the filing of the original application and before the termination of the permit, require additional information in order to enable the Director, Office of Environment, Health, Safety and Security to determine whether the permit should be granted or denied or whether it should be modified or revoked.

[41 FR 56778, Dec. 30, 1976, as amended at 71 FR 68732, Nov. 28, 2006; 88 FR 41292, June 26, 2023]
#### REILLY, Respondent, v. BARRETT, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

December 24, 1914.)

Action by William F. Reilly against William M. Barrett, as President, etc.

No opinion. Motion for leave to appeal (150 N. Y. Supp. 1108) to the Court of Appeals denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> BD
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996             DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997             SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                               0                       0 
<RECEIVABLES>                                  2205979                 1831927
<SECURITIES-RESALE>                                  0                       0 
<SECURITIES-BORROWED>                                0                       0 
<INSTRUMENTS-OWNED>                            8843349                 7273651
<PP&E>                                               0                       0 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                11049328                 9105578
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0                       0 
<PAYABLES>                                      184542                  155138
<REPOS-SOLD>                                         0                       0 
<SECURITIES-LOANED>                                  0                       0 
<INSTRUMENTS-SOLD>                                   0                       0 
<LONG-TERM>                                          0                       0 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0 
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0 
<COMMON>                                             0                       0 
<OTHER-SE>                                    10864786                 8950440 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  11049328                 9105578
<TRADING-REVENUE>                              1770613                  587124
<INTEREST-DIVIDENDS>                            433026                  321910
<COMMISSIONS>                                   220548                  132353  
<INVESTMENT-BANKING-REVENUES>                        0                       0
<FEE-REVENUE>                                        0                       0 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0                       0 
<COMPENSATION>                                       0                       0 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1983091                  776681
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     1983091                  776681
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0 
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0 
<NET-INCOME>                                   1983091                  776681
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    47.74                   17.11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    47.74                   17.11
        

</TABLE>
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution Prevention (OCSPP) 

1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. (Mailcode 7101 M) 

Washington, D.C. 20460

OPPTS-RCS-OMB-7f (revised 11/15/2010)

If you have any questions about this regulatory action or this documentation, please call the contact:

Name: eMail: Phone:

Title of 

Action:

Documentation of Changes Made During Review Under Executive Order 12866

Docket #: EPA-HQ- FRL#: RIN: 2070-

This action was submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review under Executive Order 12866, entitled 

Regulatory Planning and Review (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993). According to section 6(a)(3)(E) of the Executive Order, 

whenever the Agency makes publicly available an action that was reviewed under Executive Order 12866, the Agency is also 

required to: 

(1) Make available to the public a copy of the information that was provided to OMB's Office of Information and Regulatory 

Affairs (OIRA) for review under the Executive Order, i.e., the text of the draft action and, if applicable, an assessment 

of the potential costs and benefits; as well as additional information required for those actions that are determined to 

be economically significant under section 3(f) of the Executive Order (see section 6(a)(3)(B) & (C)); 

(2) Identify for the public any substantive changes made to the draft submitted to OMB, using a method that is complete, 

clear and simple; and 

(3) Identify for the public those substantive changes made at the suggestion or recommendation of OIRA/OMB.

For this action, were substantive changes made during the review? [Check the appropriate answer.]

Yes. [The information identified in items 1-3 below is included in the docket, as applicable.]

No. [Only the information identified in item 1 below is included in the docket.]

Accordingly, the Agency has included the following information in the public docket for this 

action: [Check the appropriate box(es).]

(2) Documentation of any substantive changes that were made to the draft document that was 

submitted to OIRA/OMB for review, when compared with what completed review, using one of the 

following methods (select one):

(1) A copy of the information that was submitted to OIRA for review under the Executive Order.

(3) Documentation of those substantive changes made at the suggestion or recommendation of 

OMB, if any, are identified in the document using one of the following methods (select one):

(a) A copy of the draft document submitted, with redline and strikeout to show all the substantive 

changes that were made during the review.

(b) A document that identifies the substantive changes that were made during the review, with 

page and paragraph references to the draft document that was submitted.

(a) Through attributions to OMB in the redline and strikeout version or other document identifying 

the changes made at OMB's recommendation. 

(c) Other (please describe):

(b) Other (please describe):
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Somsak Chivavibul,
certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period
covered by this report on Form 10-K of SLM Student Loan Trust 2013-1 (the Exchange Act periodic reports);

2. Based on my
knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing
and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer and administrator have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreement and administration agreement, as applicable, in all material respects; and

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this
report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K. In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as indenture trustee.

[Signature Page Follows]



---

Date: March 30, 2016



|                                                                     
|---------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ SOMSAK CHIVAVIBUL                                                
|Somsak Chivavibul                                                    
|President and Chief Financial Officer (Senior
Securitization Officer)
|Navient Funding, LLC