alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# EUR-Lex - 31975L0502 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31975L0502

**Commission Directive 75/502/EEC of 25 July 1975 limiting the marketing of seed of smooth-stalk meadow grass (Poa pratensis L.) to seed which has been officially certified 'basic seed' or 'certified seed' **

*
Official Journal L 228 , 29/08/1975 P. 0026 - 0026 Finnish special edition: Chapter 3 Volume 6 P. 0151 Greek special edition: Chapter 03 Volume 13 P. 0134 Swedish special edition: Chapter 3 Volume 6 P. 0151 *

++++

( 1 ) OJ NO 125 , 11 . 7 . 1966 , P . 2298/66 .

( 2 ) OJ NO L 356 , 27 . 12 . 1973 , P . 79 .

COMMISSION DIRECTIVE OF 25 JULY 1975 LIMITING THE MARKETING OF SEED OF SMOOTH-STALK MEADOWGRASS ( POA PRATENSIS L . ) TO SEED WHICH HAS BEEN OFFICIALLY CERTIFIED " BASIC SEED " OR " CERTIFIED SEED "

( 75/502/EEC )

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES ,

HAVING REGARD TO THE TREATY ESTABLISHING THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC COMMUNITY ;

HAVING REGARD TO THE COUNCIL DIRECTIVE OF 14 JUNE 1966 ( 1 ) ON THE MARKETING OF FODDER PLANT SEED , AS LAST AMENDED BY THE COUNCIL DIRECTIVE OF 11 DECEMBER 1973 ( 2 ) , IN PARTICULAR ARTICLE 3 ( 3 ) THEREOF ;

WHEREAS THE ABOVEMENTIONED DIRECTIVE PERMITS THE MARKETING OF BASIC , CERTIFIED AND COMMERCIAL SEED OF SMOOTH-STALK MEADOWGRASS ( POA PRATENSIS L . ) ;

WHEREAS ARTICLE 3 ( 3 ) OF THE DIRECTIVE AUTHORIZES THE COMMISSION TO PROHIBIT THE MARKETING OF FODDER PLANT SEED UNLESS IT HAS BEEN OFFICIALLY CERTIFIED AS " BASIC SEED " OR " CERTIFIED SEED " ;

WHEREAS THE MEMBER STATES NOW PRODUCE SUFFICIENT AMOUNTS OF BASIC AND CERTIFIED SEED TO SATISFY THE DEMAND FOR SEED OF SMOOTH-STALK MEADOWGRASS INSIDE THE COMMUNITY ;

WHEREAS IT IS CONSEQUENTLY APPROPRIATE TO ADMIT NO LONGER THE MARKETING OF SMOOTH-STALK MEADOWGRASS AFTER THE STOCKS RESULTING FROM CURRENT PRODUCTION CONDITIONS HAVE BEEN USED UP ;

WHEREAS THE MEASURES PROVIDED FOR IN THIS DIRECTIVE ARE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE OPINION OF THE STANDING COMMITTEE ON SEEDS AND PROPAGATING MATERIAL FOR AGRICULTURE , HORTICULTURE AND FORESTRY ,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DIRECTIVE :

ARTICLE 1

THE MEMBER STATES PROVIDE THAT FROM 1 JULY 1976 IT IS NO LONGER PERMITTED TO MARKET SEED OF SMOOTH-STALK MEADOWGRASS ( POA PRATENSIS L . ) UNLESS IT HAS BEEN OFFICIALLY CERTIFIED AS " BASIC SEED " OR " CERTIFIED SEED " .

ARTICLE 2

THE MEMBER STATES SHALL , NOT LATER THAN 1 JULY 1976 , BRING INTO FORCE THE LAWS , REGULATIONS OR ADMINISTRATIVE PROVISIONS NECESSARY TO COMPLY WITH THIS DIRECTIVE . THEY SHALL FORTHWITH INFORM THE COMMISSION THEREOF .

ARTICLE 3

THIS DIRECTIVE IS ADDRESSED TO THE MEMBER STATES .

DONE AT BRUSSELS , 25 JULY 1975 .

FOR THE COMMISSION

P.J . LARDINOIS

MEMBER OF THE COMMISSION
#### PEOPLE ex rel. BUCK, Respondent, v. WILLIAMS, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

July 31, 1914.)

Proceeding by the People of the State of New York, on the relation of John S. Buck, against William Williams, as Commissioner of Water Supply, Gas and Electricity, etc.

No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements, on the authority of People ex rel. Davison v. Williams, 148 N. Y. Supp. infra, decided herewith.
H. Res. 71

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

February 9, 2005.

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule

XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of

the bill (H.R. 418) to establish and rapidly implement regulations for State driver’s license and identification document security standards, to prevent terrorists from abusing the asylum laws of the United States, to unify terrorism-related

grounds for inadmissibility and removal, and to ensure expeditious construction of the San Diego border fence. The first

reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. All points of order

against consideration of the bill are waived. General debate

shall be confined to the bill and shall not exceed one hour and

40 minutes, with 40 minutes equally divided and controlled

by the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on the Judiciary; 40 minutes equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the

Committee on Government Reform; and 20 minutes equally
2

•HRES 71 EH

divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority

member of the Committee on Homeland Security. After general debate the Committee of the Whole shall rise without

motion. No further consideration of the bill shall be in order

except pursuant to a subsequent order of the House.

Attest:

Clerk.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Judicial Conference of the United States

# AGENCY:

Judicial Conference of the United States Advisory Committee on Rules of Evidence.

# ACTION:

Notice of open meeting.

# SUMMARY:

The Advisory Committee on Rules of Evidence will hold a one-day meeting. The meeting will be open to public observation but not participation.

# DATES:

                        April 1, 2011.                         *Times:*                         8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.                    

# ADDRESS:

 University of Pennsylvania, Law School, 3400 Chestnut Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Peter G. McCabe, Secretary, Rules Committee Support Office, Administrative Office of the United States Courts, Washington, DC 20544, telephone (202) 502-1820.

Dated: December 21, 2010.

Peter G. McCabe,

Rules Committee Support Office.

[FR Doc. 2010-32433 Filed 12-27-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 2210-55-M
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

 Respondent

 v.

MARCUS LEE GRAHAM,

 Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 893 MAL 2014

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

 Respondent

 v.

MARCUS LEE GRAHAM,

 Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 894 MAL 2014

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 10th day of March, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED.
#### Robert Tully, Respondent, v. Roosevelt Properties, Inc., Defendant, and Joseph Bisceglia & Sons, Inc., Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant. South Shore Brick Masons, Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent.

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, defendant and third-party plaintiff Joseph Bisceglia *&*Sons, Inc., appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an interlocutory judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, entered May 19, 1969 after a jury trial upon the issues of liability only, as (1) adjudged it liable to plaintiff, upon the jury’s verdict, and (2) dismissed its third-party complaint against third-party defendant, South Shore Brick Masons, Inc., upon decision of the trial court. Judgment affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs to respondents jointly. Appellant was the general contractor engaged to construct a department store in Westbury, Long Island. Plaintiff was in the employ of the third-party defendant, a subcontractor engaged by appellant to assist it in the project. Plaintiff testified that on the morning of December 4, 1962, the date of the accident in which he was injured, he was directed by appellant’s superintendent in charge of the project to use a designated well wheel and rope for hoisting cinder blocks up the elevator shaft. The well wheel and rope were attached to the ceiling of the shaft. While he was working on the second story of the structure, hoisting cinder blocks up the elevator shaft with the well wheel and rope, the rope, which was in his hand, came apart at a point above his head where it had been knotted. Plaintiff and the cinder blocks were catapulted down the open elevator shaft to its bottom—a distance of about 15 feet. The case was submitted to the jury on the issue whether appellant, as the general contractor, had violated *787subdivision 1 of section 240 of the Labor Law in directing plaintiff to perform the hoisting work with defective equipment. In our opinion, this question was properly submitted to the jury and the jury’s verdict was supported by the evidence (cf. *Sarnoff*v. *Charles Schad, Inc.,*22 N Y 2d 180; *Koenig*v. *Patrick Constr. Corp.,*298 N. Y. 313; *Galbraith*v. *Pike & Son,*18 A D 2d 39). The' third-party complaint was properly dismissed since appellant’s duty under the above-mentioned provision of the Labor Law to furnish plaintiff with safe equipment in the performance of the directed work was nondelegable. Its violation of that statute, as found by the jury, constituted affirmative negligence. Thus, it had no claim over against the third-party defendant on the theory that the latter owned the well wheel and rope (cf. *Rufo*v. *Orlando,*309 N. Y. 345, 350). Christ, P. J., Hopkins, Brennan and Benjamin, JJ., concur. (Beldock, P. J., deceased.)
§ 824.6 Preliminary notice of violation. ( a ) In order to begin a proceeding to impose a civil penalty under this part, the Director shall notify the person by a written preliminary notice of violation sent by certified mail, return receipt requested, of: ( 1 ) The date, facts, and nature of each act or omission constituting the alleged violation;
( 2 ) The particular provision of the regulation, rule or compliance order involved in each alleged violation;
( 3 ) The proposed remedy for each alleged violation, including the amount of any civil penalty proposed; and,
( 4 ) The right of the person to submit a written reply to the Director within 30 calendar days of receipt of such preliminary notice of violation.
( b ) A reply to a preliminary notice of violation must contain a statement of all relevant facts pertaining to an alleged violation. The reply must: ( 1 ) State any facts, explanations and arguments which support a denial of the alleged violation;
( 2 ) Demonstrate any extenuating circumstances or other reason why a proposed remedy should not be imposed or should be mitigated;
( 3 ) Discuss the relevant authorities which support the position asserted, including rulings, regulations, interpretations, and previous decisions issued by DOE;
( 4 ) Furnish full and complete answers to any questions set forth in the preliminary notice; and
( 5 ) Include copies of all relevant documents.
( c ) If a person fails to submit a written reply within 30 calendar days of receipt of a preliminary notice of violation: ( 1 ) The person relinquishes any right to appeal any matter in the preliminary notice; and
( 2 ) The preliminary notice, including any remedies therein, constitutes a final order.
( d ) The Director, at the request of a person notified of an alleged violation, may extend for a reasonable period the time for submitting a reply or a hearing request letter.
SERVED: APRIL 23, 2015 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ·· ·· 

In The Matter Of: 

JETBLUE AIRWAYS 

CORPORATION 

Respondent 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS . ·:;. ' 

WASHINGTON, DC 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Docket No. FAA-2014-0813 

Case No. 2012EA150022 

ORDER CANCELLING 

BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND MOTION CONFERENCE 

On April 6, 2015, an Order Accepting Late-Filed Proposed Briefing Schedule and Setting 

Motion Conference was filed ("April 6, 2015 Order"). 

On April 22, 2015 the parties filed a Notice of Settlement, in which they asserted that 

they were in the "process of finalizing" a settlement. As a result, the Respondent, JetBlue 

Airways Corporation, would not be pursuing a motion to dismiss. The parties also confirmed that 

they would advise this Court when the settlement was finalized. 

Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. § 13.205, and having reviewed the case file, all pleadings and 

motions, all relevant caselaw, statutes, regulations, rules, and authority, and being fully advised~ 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 

1. The briefing schedule set by the April6, 2015 Order is cancelled. 

2. The Motion Conference set on June 2, 2015 (11 :OOam -12:00pm ET) is cancelled. 

Attachment: Service List 
SERVICE LIST- BY U.S. MAIL 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000 1 

Mr. Christian Lewerenz 

Complainant's Counsel 

Office of Regional Counsel, Eastern: Region 

Federal Aviation Administration 

1 Aviation Plaza 

Jamaica, NY 11434 

TEL: 718-553-3258 

FAX: 718-995-5699 

Mr. Steven Raffaele 

Respondent's Counsel 

HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP 

31 West 5211d Street 

NewYork,NY 10019 

TEL: 212-513-3200 

FAX: 212-385-9010 

Judge J.E. Sullivan 

US. Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (£11-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-6941 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

ONE COPY 

Docket No. FAA-2014-0813 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation 

Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W ., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W I 000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: 

Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
EX-35.1
(logo) ncb


2011 Crystal Drive
Suite 800
Arlington, Virginia 22202

TEL  (703) 302-8000
TOLL (800) 955-9622
FAX  (703) 647-3460

February 26,2014

Wells Fargo Bank, NA, as Certificate Administrator
and Rule 17g-5 Information Provider
Attn: Compliance Manager
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045

RE:      Annual Statement as to Compliance
         WFRBS 2013 C12

Dear Sir/Madam:


In accordance with the Pooling and Servicing Agreement entered into in
connection with the issuance of the Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through
Certificates Series 2013-C12, as an authorized officer of NCB, FSB (the
"NCB Master Servicer"), I hereby certify pursuant to Section 11.12 thereof that:


a.  A review of the activities of the NCB Master Servicer during the
    preceding calendar year and of its performance under the Pooling and
    Servicing Agreement has been made under my supervision.


b.  To the best of my knowledge, based on these reviews, the NCB Master Servicer
    Servicer has fulfilled all obligations under this agreement in all material
    respects throughout the year.


Please note that the annual financial statement will be sent under separate
cover on or before March 31,2014.



Best regards,

/s/ Karyn Mann

Karyn Mann
Senior Vice President, Investor Compliance
NCB,FSB

www.ncb.coop

Banking & Financial Services
Cooperative Expansion
Economic Development


NCB refers to National Consumer Cooperative Bank and its subsidiaries (primarily
NCB Financial Corporation and its subsidiary NCB, FSB), its affiliated
non-profit corporation, NCB Capital Impact, and also NCB Community Works,LLC,
which is jointly owned by NCB and NCB Capital Impact. Each is a separate
corporation within the NCB Financial Group.
2007-1394.

#### State v. Crosby.

Lucas App. No. L-05-1241, 2007-Ohio-3468. Reported at 115 Ohio St.3d 1475, 2007-Ohio-5735, 875 N.E.2d 628. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.

Lanzinger, J., not participating.
CHARTS

Conventional . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $19.75

Small Craft (Folio, Area, Route) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $19.75

Recreation #14786 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $33.25

Recreation (all others) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $22.25

Canoe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $10.75

PUBLICATIONS

Coast Pilots . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $28.00

MISCELLANEOUS PUBLICATIONS

Offshore Oil and Gas Leasing Areas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $19.75

Nautical Training Charts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $3.00

Shoreline Movement Maps (set) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $10.00

Plotting Map - New England to Bermuda . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $14.25

Marine Weather Service Charts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $1.25

Historical Maps:

Ellicott Map of Washington, D.C., 1800 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $6.00

L’Enfant Plan of Washington, D.C., 1792 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $6.00

Chart Catalogs 1-4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Free

Dates of Latest Editions, Nautical Charts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Free

Posters

Nautical . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .$4.00

A5902–N

NOS Nautical Charts

and Related Products Price List

Prices effective October 1, 2006

HOW TO ORDER NOS NAUTICAL CHARTS AND RELATED PRODUCTS: Find the product name and stock number in the chart

catalog, and the current price on this list. Please provide your name, delivery address, the product name(s), stock number(s), and 

quantity on the Customer Order Form found in the back of the catalog or on a separate sheet of paper. Please include room or apartment number on your delivery address, and a daytime phone number should questions arise about your order. Payment must be

included with your order. Remittance must be in U.S. funds, by check payable to FAA, on a U.S. bank, by international money order,

or by providing VISA, American Express, Diners Club International, MasterCard or DiscoverCard account information. All sales are

final, unless an error is made by this office in filling the order. Please note that returned checks will result in the cancellation of

your order. You may FAX your order to 301-436-6829, or place an order by calling 800–638–8972 or 301–436–8301.

Send mail orders and payment to: FAA, National Aeronautical Charting Office, Distribution Division AJW-3550, 10201 Good Luck Road,

Glenn Dale, MD 20769-9700. Please refer to the chart catalog for further ordering information.

PLEASE NOTE: Prices are subject to change without notice

Distributed By:

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION

National Aeronautical Charting Office

Aeronautical Chart Distribution

Glenn Dale, MD 20769-9700

I ♥ BOATING WITH

LIFE JACKETS. NOAA NAUTICAL CHARTS

They Float. You Don’t.
Editorial Note on Part 70
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 70 appear at 81 FR 86910, Dec. 2, 2016.

§ 70.36 Inalienability of licenses. ( a ) No license granted under the regulations in this part and no right to possess or utilize special nuclear material granted by any license issued pursuant to the regulations in this part shall be transferred, assigned or in any manner disposed of, either voluntarily or involuntarily, directly or indirectly, through transfer of control of any license to any person unless the Commission shall after securing full information, find that the transfer is in accordance with the provisions of the Act, and shall give its consent in writing.
( b ) An application for transfer of license must include: ( 1 ) The identity, technical and financial qualifications of the proposed transferee; and
( 2 ) Financial assurance for decommissioning information required by § 70.25.
[21 FR 764, Feb. 3, 1956, as amended at 35 FR 11461, July 17, 1970; 76 FR 35573, June 17, 2011]
IV 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 516 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 3763) to reinstate the application 

of the wage requirements of the Davis-Bacon Act to Federal contracts 

in areas affected by Hurricane Katrina. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 26, 2005 

Mr. MELANCON submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Rules 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 3763) to reinstate the application of the wage requirements of the 

Davis-Bacon Act to Federal contracts in areas affected 

by Hurricane Katrina. 

1 Resolved, That immediately upon the adoption of this 

2 resolution the House shall without intervention of any 

3 point of order consider in the House the bill (H.R. 3763) 

4 to reinstate the application of the wage requirements of 

5 the Davis-Bacon Act to Federal contracts in areas affected 

6 by Hurricane Katrina. The bill shall be considered as read. 

7 The previous question shall be considered as ordered on 

8 the bill to final passage without intervening motion except: 
2 

•HRES 516 IH 

1 (1) one hour of debate on the bill equally divided and con2 trolled by the chairman and ranking minority member of 

3 the Committee on Education and the Workforce; and (2) 

4 one motion to recommit. 

Æ
# EUR-Lex - 31992D0342 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31992D0342

**92/342/EEC: Commission Decision of 5 June 1992 approving the plan for the approval of establishments for the purposes of intra-Community trade in poultry and hatching eggs submitted by Germany (Only the German text is authentic) **

*
Official Journal L 188 , 08/07/1992 P. 0039 - 0039 *

COMMISSION DECISION

of 5 June 1992

approving the plan for the approval of establishments for the purposes of intra-Community trade in poultry and hatching eggs submitted by Germany

(Only the German text is authentic)

(92/342/EEC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community,

Having regard to Council Directive 90/539/EEC of 15 October 1990 on animal health conditions governing intra-Community trade in, and imports from third countries of, poultry and hatching eggs (1), as last amended by Directive 91/496/EEC (2), and in particular Article 3 (2) thereof,

Whereas by letter dated 10 March 1992 Germany transmitted a plan to the Commission;

Whereas the plan has been examined and found to meet the requirements of Directive 90/539/EEC, and in particular Annex II thereof;

Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Veterinary Committee,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The plan submitted by Germany for the approval of establishments for the purposes of intra-Community trade in poultry and hatching eggs is hereby approved.

Article 2

Germany shall bring into force by 15 June 1992 the laws, regulations and administrative provisions for implementation of the plan referred to in Article 1.

Article 3

This Decision is addressed to Germany.

Done at Brussels, 5 June 1992. For the Commission

Ray MAC SHARRY

Member of the Commission