alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit
      32**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





**In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of American Resources and Development
      Company. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2008,
      as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
      "Report"), I, Keith M Elison, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as
      adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:**





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/
                    KEITH M ELISON**Keith
                M Elison**Chief
                Financial Officer and Principal Accounting OfficerNovember
                14, 2008





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been
      provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. The foregoing
      certifications are accompanying the Company's Form 10-Q solely pursuant to
      section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
      section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being
      filed
      as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document.
§ 71.19 Previously approved package. ( a ) A Type B(U) package, a Type B(M) package, or a fissile material package, previously approved by the NRC but without the designation “-85” in the identification number of the NRC CoC, may be used under the general license of § 71.17 with the following additional conditions: ( 1 ) Fabrication of the package is satisfactorily completed by April 1, 1999, as demonstrated by application of its model number in accordance with § 71.85(c);
( 2 ) A package used for a shipment to a location outside the United States is subject to multilateral approval as defined in DOT regulations at 49 CFR 173.403; and
( 3 ) A serial number which uniquely identifies each packaging which conforms to the approved design is assigned to and legibly and durably marked on the outside of each packaging.
( b ) A Type B(U) package, a Type B(M) package, or a fissile material package previously approved by the NRC with the designation “-85” in the identification number of the NRC CoC, may be used under the general license of § 71.17 with the following additional conditions: ( 1 ) Fabrication of the package must be satisfactorily completed by December 31, 2006, as demonstrated by application of its model number in accordance with § 71.85(c); and
( 2 ) A package used for a shipment to a location outside the United States is subject to multilateral approval as defined in the DOT's regulations at 49 CFR 173.403.
( c ) NRC will approve modifications to the design and authorized contents of a Type B package, or a fissile material package, previously approved by NRC, provided— ( 1 ) The modifications of a Type B package are not significant with respect to the design, operating characteristics, or safe performance of the containment system, when the package is subjected to the tests specified in §§ 71.71 and 71.73;
( 2 ) The modifications of a fissile material package are not significant, with respect to the prevention of criticality, when the package is subjected to the tests specified in §§ 71.71 and 71.73; and
( 3 ) The modifications to the package satisfy the requirements of this part.
( d ) NRC will revise the package identification number to designate previously approved package designs as B, BF, AF, B(U), B(M), B(U)F, B(M)F, B(U)-85, B(U)F-85, B(M)-85, B(M)F-85, or AF-85 as appropriate, and with the identification number suffix “-96” after receipt of an application demonstrating that the design meets the requirements of this part.
[69 FR 3786, Jan. 26, 2004; 69 FR 6139, Feb. 10, 2004, as amended at 80 FR 34012, June 12, 2015]
§ 73.8 Information collection requirements: OMB approval. ( a ) The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has submitted the information collection requirements contained in this part to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for approval as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 *et seq.*). The NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information is it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. OMB has approved the information collection requirements contained in this part under control number 3150-0002.
( b ) The approved information collection requirements contained in this part appear in §§ 73.5, 73.15, 73.17, 73.20, 73.21, 73.24, 73.25, 73.26, 73.27, 73.37, 73.40, 73.45, 73.46, 73.50, 73.54, 73.55, 73.56, 73.57, 73.58, 73.60, 73.67, 73.70, 73.72, 73.73, 73.74, 73.1200, 73.1205, 73.1210, 73.1215, and appendices B and C to this part.
( c ) This part contains information collection requirements in addition to those approved under the control number specified in paragraph (a) of this section. These information collection requirements and control numbers under which they are approved are as follows: ( 1 ) In § 73.17, NRC Form 754 is approved under control number 3150-0204;
( 2 ) In §§ 73.17 and 73.57, Federal Bureau of Investigation Form FD-258 is approved under control number 1110-0046; and
( 3 ) In § 73.1205, NRC Form 366 is approved under control number 3150-0104.
[62 FR 52189, Oct. 6, 1997, as amended at 67 FR 67101, Nov. 4, 2002; 73 FR 63574, Oct. 24, 2008; 74 FR 13970, Mar. 27, 2009; 77 FR 39909, July 6, 2012; 78 FR 29550, May 20, 2013; 80 FR 67275, Nov. 2, 2015; 80 FR 74981, Dec. 1, 2015; 88 FR 15882, Mar. 14, 2023]
#### § 95.49 Security of automatic data processing (ADP) systems.

Classified data or information may not be processed or produced on an ADP system unless the system and procedures to protect the classified data or information have been approved by the CSA. Approval of the ADP system and procedures is based on a satisfactory ADP security proposal submitted as part of the licensee's, certificate holder's, or other person's request for facility clearance outlined in § 95.15 or submitted as an amendment to its existing Standard Practice Procedures Plan for the protection of classified information.

[72 FR 49564, Aug. 28, 2007]
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-09-00551-CV

Rhett Webster Pease, Appellant

v.

First National Bank of Giddings, Appellee

FROM THE COUNTY COURT OF LEE COUNTY

NO. 3014, HONORABLE EDWARD F. JANECKA, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant Rhett Webster Pease appeals from a county court order vacating a writ of

reentry he obtained in justice court after filing an emergency application for writ of reentry to

property owned by appellee First National Bank of Giddings. This Court has affirmed the order of

the county court dismissing the litigation underlying this appeal. See Pease v. First Nat’l Bank of

Giddings, No. 03-11-00192-CV, 2012 WL 1948343 (Tex. App.—Austin May 25, 2012, no pet. h.)

(mem. op.). Our affirmance of the order that dismissed the underlying litigation in its entirety

renders moot any appeal related to the merits of the justice court’s or county court’s disposition of

that litigation, including this appeal challenging the county court’s pre-dismissal disposition of the

writ of reentry. We therefore dismiss this appeal as moot.
_____________________________________________

J. Woodfin Jones, Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Pemberton and Henson

Dismissed as Moot

Filed: May 25, 2012

2
# FOIA Annual Reports

            -  Share 
            -          Post      Linkedin
Email
Print

In accordance with the Electronic FOIA Amendments of 1996, each Department is required to submit electronically available annual reports.  The annual reports must specify specific numerical benchmarks such as the number of requests received and processed; the types of requests received, the number of requests where the agency did not release the requested records and the reasons for these decisions; the number of appeals the results, the amount of fees collected; and the number of staff and staff hours devoted to processing requests.

For annual reports from 1998-2014, see the FDA Archive.
FOIA Annual Reports- 2015 FOIA Annual Report
- 2016 FOIA Annual Report
-  Content current as of:
03/28/2018
 
-   
-  FOIA Annual Reports     
Footer Links- FDA Archive
- About FDA
- Accessibility
- Visitor Information 
- Website Policies / Privacy
- No FEAR Act
- Vulnerability Disclosure Policy
- FOIA
- HHS.gov
- USA.gov
Contact FDAFollow FDA on FacebookFollow FDA on XFollow FDA on InstagramFollow FDA on LinkedInView FDA videos on YouTubeSubscribe to FDA RSS feedsFDA HomepageContact Number      1-888-INFO-FDA (1-888-463-6332)    Back to Top
#### § 950.20 General provisions.

The parties shall include provisions in the Standby Support Contract to specify the procedures and conditions set forth in this subpart for the submission of claims and the payment of covered costs under the Standby Support Contract. A sponsor is required to establish that there is a covered event, a covered delay and a covered cost; the Department is required to establish an exclusion in accordance with § 950.14(b).
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 621 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 621

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                     December 16, 2005.
    Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker 
may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XVIII, declare the House resolved into the 
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for further consideration 
of the bill (H.R. 4437) to amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to 
strengthen enforcement of the immigration laws, to enhance border security, and 
for other purposes. No further general debate shall be in order, and remaining 
proceedings under House Resolution 610 shall be considered as subsumed by this 
resolution. Notwithstanding clause 11 of rule XVIII, no further amendment to the 
bill, as amended, shall be in order except those printed in the report of the 
Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution. Each further amendment may be 
offered only in the order printed in the report, may be offered only by a Member 
designated in the report, shall be considered as read, shall be debatable for 
the time specified in the report equally divided and controlled by the proponent 
and an opponent, shall not be subject to amendment, and shall not be subject to 
a demand for division of the question in the House or in the Committee of the 
Whole. All points of order against such further amendments are waived. At the 
conclusion of consideration of the bill for amendment the Committee shall rise 
and report the bill, as amended, to the House with such further amendments as 
may have been adopted. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on 
the bill and amendments thereto to final passage without intervening motion 
except one motion to recommit with or without instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Editorial Note on Part 9
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 9 appear at 82 FR 52825, Nov. 15, 2017.

§ 9.8 Information collection requirements: OMB approval. ( a ) The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has submitted the information collection requirements contained in this part to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for approval as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 *et seq.*). The NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. OMB has approved the information collection requirements contained in this part under control number 3150-0043.
( b ) The approved information collection requirements contained in this part appear in §§ 9.23, 9.25, 9.28, 9.29, 9.40, 9.41, 9.53, 9.54, 9.55, 9.65, 9.66, and 9.67.
[62 FR 52184, Oct. 6, 1997, as amended at 63 FR 2876, Jan. 20, 1998; 70 FR 34306, June 14, 2005]
§ 71.15 Exemption from classification as fissile material. Fissile material meeting the requirements of at least one of the paragraphs (a) through (f) of this section are exempt from classification as fissile material and from the fissile material package standards of §§ 71.55 and 71.59, but are subject to all other requirements of this part, except as noted. ( a ) Individual package containing 2 grams or less fissile material.
( b ) Individual or bulk packaging containing 15 grams or less of fissile material provided the package has at least 200 grams of solid nonfissile material for every gram of fissile material. Lead, beryllium, graphite, and hydrogenous material enriched in deuterium may be present in the package but must not be included in determining the required mass for solid nonfissile material.
( c ) ( 1 ) Low concentrations of solid fissile material commingled with solid nonfissile material, provided that: ( i ) There is at least 2000 grams of solid nonfissile material for every gram of fissile material, and
( ii ) There is no more than 180 grams of fissile material distributed within 360 kg of contiguous nonfissile material.
( 2 ) Lead, beryllium, graphite, and hydrogenous material enriched in deuterium may be present in the package but must not be included in determining the required mass of solid nonfissile material.
( d ) Uranium enriched in uranium-235 to a maximum of 1 percent by weight, and with total plutonium and uranium-233 content of up to 1 percent of the mass of uranium-235, provided that the mass of any beryllium, graphite, and hydrogenous material enriched in deuterium constitutes less than 5 percent of the uranium mass, and that the fissile material is distributed homogeneously and does not form a lattice arrangement within the package.
( e ) Liquid solutions of uranyl nitrate enriched in uranium-235 to a maximum of 2 percent by mass, with a total plutonium and uranium-233 content not exceeding 0.002 percent of the mass of uranium, and with a minimum nitrogen to uranium atomic ratio (N/U) of 2. The material must be contained in at least a DOT Type A package.
( f ) Packages containing, individually, a total plutonium mass of not more than 1000 grams, of which not more than 20 percent by mass may consist of plutonium-239, plutonium-241, or any combination of these radionuclides.
[69 FR 3786, Jan. 26, 2004, as amended at 80 FR 34012, June 12, 2015]
#### § 501.182 Injunctions.

Whenever it appears to OFE that any person has committed, is committing, or is about to commit a violation of any provision of the Act, or any rule or order thereunder, OFE may, in accordance with section 724 of FUA, bring a civil action in the appropriate United States District Court to enjoin such acts or practices. The relief sought may include a mandatory injunction commanding any person to comply with any provision of such provision, order or rule, the violation of which is prohibited by section 724 of FUA and may also include interim equitable relief.
IV 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 640 

Expressing support for the designation of December 3, 2017, as the ‘‘National 

Day of 3D Printing’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 1, 2017 

Mr. FOSTER (for himself, Mr. RYAN of Ohio, Mr. CICILLINE, Mr. TAKANO, 

Ms. KAPTUR, Mr. BEN RAY LUJA ́N of New Mexico, Mr. KHANNA, Ms. 

HANABUSA, Mr. LIPINSKI, and Mr. FARENTHOLD) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and 

Commerce 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for the designation of December 3, 2017, 

as the ‘‘National Day of 3D Printing’’. 

Whereas additive manufacturing, also known as 3D printing, 

is a process by which digital 3D design data is used to 

build up a component in layers by depositing material; 

Whereas 3D printing creates an object layer by layer, greatly 

reducing waste and increasing efficiency compared to traditional manufacturing techniques; 

Whereas 3D printing has grown exponentially over the last 

several years; 

Whereas the United States is a world leader in advanced 

manufacturing, and has a history of design innovation; 


dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 640 IH 

Whereas public-private partnerships that promote advanced 

manufacturing, such as the Digital Manufacturing and 

Design Innovation Institute and other Manufacturing Innovation Institutes, will develop enhanced digital capabilities to design and test new products and reduce costs in 

manufacturing processes across a variety of industries; 

Whereas 3D printing has widespread applications in home 

construction, home goods production, biotechnology, the 

automotive sector, aerospace, medicine, consumer electronics, and defense; 

Whereas 3D printing has the potential to reshape manufacturing in the United States, by decreasing the cost of 

producing goods for small businesses and local manufacturers; 

Whereas innovation will be increased, as 3D printing reduces 

the time required for product development and market 

launch; and 

Whereas, December 3, 2017, would be an appropriate date to 

designate as the ‘‘National Day of 3D Printing’’: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) supports the designation of the ‘‘National 

3 Day of 3D Printing’’; 

4 (2) recognizes the economic impact of 3D print5 ing and the positive implications of 3D printing for 

6 the United States advanced manufacturing sector; 

7 and 


dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 640 IH 

1 (3) encourages the promotion and celebration of 

2 3D printing technology. 

Æ 


dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit
      32**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





**In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of American Resources and Development
      Company. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30,
      2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
      (the "Report"), I, Tom Stamos, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as
      adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:**





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.





/s/ **TOM
      STAMOS**





**Tom
      Stamos**


President
      and Principal Accounting Officer


December
      27, 2007





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been
      provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. The foregoing
      certifications are accompanying the Company's Form 10-QSB solely pursuant to
      section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
      section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being
      filed
      as part of the Form 10-QSB or as a separate disclosure document.
Summary of Non-Employee Director Compensation



 EXHIBIT 10.1 
 Summary of Non-Employee Director Compensation 
 Directors of Entravision Communications Corporation
who are not officers or employees of the company are compensated for their services as follows: (i) an annual grant under the company’s then-current equity incentive plan, in an amount and with the terms and conditions as may be provided
from time to time in the company’s then-current equity incentive plan, or as may otherwise be determined by the Board; (ii) $24,000 per year; (iii) $1,250 for attendance at a Board meeting in person ($500 if telephonically); and
(iv) $1,000 for attendance at a committee meeting in person ($500 if telephonically and an additional $250 if serving as the chairperson of the committee). However, Board committees may waive the meeting fees to which they would otherwise be
entitled, subject to the unanimous approval of all members of the relevant committee.
#### § 1108.255 Nonprocurement instrument.

*Nonprocurement instrument* means a legal instrument other than a procurement contract that a DoD Component may award. Examples include an instrument of financial assistance, such as a grant or cooperative agreement, or an instrument of technical assistance, which provides services in lieu of money.
#### In the Matter of Matthew Newman.

Order entered terminating suspension and reinstating petitioner as an attorney and counselor at law. Present — Dillon, P. J., Cardamone, Schnepp, Witmer and Moule, JJ.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MIGUEL ANGEL QUIJOSA,

Petitioner,

v.

JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney

General,

Respondent. No. 15

- 72816

Agency No. A205

- 065

- 550

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted August 9 , 2017 **

Before: SCHROEDER, TASHIMA, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Miguel Angel Quijosa, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro s e for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to

reconsider. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of

discretion the BIA’s denial of a motion to reconsider, Cano

- Merida v. INS , 311

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

AUG 15 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 15

- 72816

F.3d 960, 96 4 (9th Cir. 2002), and we deny the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion to reconsider as

untimely where Quijosa’s filed the motion over seven months after the filing

deadline

. See 8 U.S.C. § 1229a(c)(6)(B) (setti ng a 30 day deadline for motions to

reconsider).

We do not consider Quijosa’s contentions relating to the agency’s

underlying denial of cancellation of removal. We previously addressed the

agency’s denial of relief in Quijosa v. Holder , No. 13

- 73669 (9th Cir. Feb. 25,

2014) (Order).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
§ 1108.15 Acquisition. *Acquisition* means the process of acquiring as described in: ( a ) Paragraph (a) of § 1108.10 when used in connection with DoD Component actions at the prime tier.
( b ) Paragraph (b) of § 1108.10 when used in connection with recipient or subrecipient actions at a lower tier under a DoD Component's award.
#### GOLDSTEIN, Respondent, v. NEW YORK STATE RYS., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

July 7, 1914.)

Action by Sarah Goldstein, as administratrix, etc., against the New York State Railways.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.

MERRELL, J., dissents.