alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 685 

Requesting the President and directing the Secretary of State and Secretary 

of Defense provide to the House of Representatives certain documents 

in their possession relating to any entity with which the United States 

has contracted for public relations purposes concerning Iraq. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 15, 2006 

Mr. KUCINICH submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Armed Services 

RESOLUTION 

Requesting the President and directing the Secretary of State 

and Secretary of Defense provide to the House of Representatives certain documents in their possession relating to any entity with which the United States has 

contracted for public relations purposes concerning Iraq. 

1 Resolved, That the President is requested and the 

2 Secretary of State and Secretary of Defense are directed 

3 to provide to the House of Representatives, not later than 

4 14 days after the date of adoption of this resolution, all 

5 documents in the possession of the President, the Sec6 retary of State, or the Secretary of Defense, respectively, 

7 relating to any entity (including the Rendon Group and 
2 

•HRES 685 IH 

1 the Lincoln Group) with which the United States has en2 tered into a contract for public relations purposes con3 cerning Iraq insofar as such documents relate to such con4 tract, including— 

5 (1) any such document relating to communica6 tions between United States Government officials 

7 and any such entity relating to such contract, in8 cluding any notes and minutes from meetings, 

9 memos, telephone and electronic mail records, logs 

10 and calendars, and records of discussions; 

11 (2) any such document comprising the proposed 

12 or realized public relations work by any such entity 

13 for the United States pursuant to such contract, in14 cluding any strategy proposal, press release, news 

15 article and any proposal for a news article, biog16 raphy or other summary of any individual, leaflets, 

17 pamphlets, and memos; and 

18 (3) any such document relating to the business 

19 relationship arising from such contract between the 

20 United States and any such entity, including any re21 quest for proposals leading to the contract with such 

22 entity and any billing statement. 

Æ
## DOE Analys is in Support of the EPA Evaluation of Wa i ver s of the Renewable Fuel Standard

Impacts of the W aiver s on the E nergy P ortion of the Consumer Price Index

DOE utilized the Bureau of Labor Statistics Consumer Price Index (CPI) 1 

### methodology to calculate the energy component effects on the CPI. Below are the estimated impacts on the energy component of CPI for the two ISU cases.

Iowa State Mean Estimate Iowa State Mandate

Binds

Units

Change in Blended Fuel Price with Waiver $/gallon

- $0.00 2

- $ 0

. 016

Change in Energy CPI with Waiver percent

- 0.0 3 %

- 0. 23 %



### Below is an example worksheet with the weights of energy prices calculated in both the wholesale and consumer price indices

. The first column is the actual weights in the equation; the second column recalculates the equation weights to give the detailed energy price impacts on the overall WPI (wholesale price index)
or CPI

. DOE use d these weights to calculate how changes in energy prices would impact overall CPI and WPI.

1 BLS tables may be found at http://www.bls.gov/cpi/cpiri2011.pdf for the CPI and www.bls.gov/ppi and select PPI Tables, ftb://ftp.bls.gov/pub/special.requests/ppi/sopnew12.txt for the WPI

### 2

### 3 

## Monetary I mpact of the W aiver s by H ousehold

DOE estimated the economic impacts of the RFS waiver s on the average and first quintile of households using data from the Bureau of La bor Statistics Consumer Expenditure Survey, 20 11, and the H ousehold V ehicles E nergy U se: L atest D ata & T rends, from the Energy Information Administration (EIA) DOE/EIA

- 0464 (2005), November, 2005. Estimates for annual gasoline consumption for average and first quintile households by income were taken from the EIA Household Vehicle Energy Use report; average and first quintile household expenditure and income after taxes data were taken from the BLS consumer expenditure survey, 2011. Estimates of the chang es in consumer expenditures, the percentage change in annual household expenditures, and the changes as a percent of income after taxes were derived for the two ISU scenarios: mean estimate and binding mandate. The table below presents the estimates based on the two scenarios:

Impacts on Energy CPI and Gasoline Expenditures for Average and Low Income Households

Iowa State Mean Estimate Iowa State Mandate

Binds

Units

Change in Blended Fuel Price with Waiver $/gallon

- $0.00 2

- $0.01 6

Change in Annual Expenditures on Gasoline For Average Household with Vehicles $

- $ 1

. 98

- $1 7

. 40

Change in Annual Expenditures on Gasoline For Lowest Quintile Households with Vehicles $

- $ 1 .2 0 $ 10.49

Change as a Percentage of Consumer Expenditures for Average Household with Vehicles percent 0.00%

- 0.0 4 %

Change as a Percentage of Consumer Expenditures for Lowest Quintile of Vehicle Owners percent

- 0.01%

- 0.0 5 %

Change as a Percentage of Income After Taxes for Average Household with Vehicles percent 0.00%

- 0.0 3 %

Change as a Percentage of Income After Taxes for Lowest Quintile with Vehicles percent

- 0.0 1 %

- 0. 10 %
Editorial Note on Part 9
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 9 appear at 82 FR 52825, Nov. 15, 2017.

§ 9.21 Publicly available records. ( a ) Single copies of NRC publications in the NUREG series, NRC Regulatory Guides, and Standard Review Plans can be ordered from the National Technical Information Service, 5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, Virginia, 22161.
( b ) For the convenience of persons who may wish to inspect without charge, or purchase copies of a record or a limited category of records for a fee, publicly available records of the NRC's activities described in paragraph (c) of this section are also made available at the NRC Web site, *http://www.nrc.gov ,* and/or at the Public Document Room located at One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike (first floor), Rockville, Maryland 20852-2738, between 7:45 am and 4:15 pm on Monday through Friday except Federal holidays.
( c ) The following records of NRC activities are available for public inspection in an electronic format: ( 1 ) Final opinions including concurring and dissenting opinions as well as orders of the NRC issued as a result of adjudication of cases;
( 2 ) Statements of policy and interpretations that have been adopted by the NRC and have not been published in the Federal Register;
( 3 ) Nuclear Regulatory Commission rules and regulations;
( 4 ) Nuclear Regulatory Commission Manuals and instructions to NRC personnel that affect any member of the public;
( 5 ) Copies of all records, regardless of form or format— ( i ) That have been released to any person under § 9.23; and
( ii ) ( A ) That because of the nature of their subject matter, the NRC determines have become or are likely to become the subject of subsequent requests for substantially the same records; or
( B ) That have been requested 3 or more times;
( 6 ) Individual indexes to publicly available records, including those records specified in paragraph (c) of this section, may be created by using the search features of the Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS), located at the NRC Web site, *http://www.nrc.gov .* This capability made it unnecessary for the NRC to continue publishing its monthly publication, *Documents Made Publicly Available* (NUREG-0540) after March 1999.
( d ) The published versions of the records made publicly available under paragraph (c)(1) of this section are available under the title, Nuclear Regulatory Issuances, NUREG-0750, for purchase through the National Technical Information Service.
[64 FR 48950, Sept. 9, 1999, as amended at 67 FR 67098, Nov. 4, 2002; 70 FR 34306, June 14, 2005; 81 FR 96346, Dec. 30, 2016]
§ 780.4 Filing and service of documents. ( a ) All communications regarding proceedings subject to this part should be addressed to: Chairman, Patent Compensation Board, U.S. Department of Energy, 1000 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20585. All documents offered for filing shall be accompanied by proof of service upon all parties to the proceeding or their attorneys of record as required by law, rule, or order of the Department. Service on the Department shall be by mail or delivery to: Office of Assistant General Counsel for Technology Transfer and Intellectual Property, U.S. Department of Energy, 1000 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20585.
( b ) Filing by mail will be deemed to be complete as of the time of deposit in the United States mail.
[77 FR 4887, Feb. 1, 2012]
###### Editorial Note on Part 9

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 9 appear at 82 FR 52825, Nov. 15, 2017.

#### § 9.203 Procedure where response to demand is required prior to receiving instructions.

If a response to the demand is required before the instructions from the Inspector General or the General Counsel are received, a U.S. attorney or NRC attorney designated for the purpose shall appear with the employee of the NRC upon whom the demand has been made, and shall furnish the court or other authority with a copy of the regulations contained in this subpart and inform the court or other authority that the demand has been, or is being, as the case may be, referred for the prompt consideration of the appropriate NRC official and shall respectfully request the court or authority to stay the demand pending receipt of the requested instructions. In the event that an immediate demand for production or disclosure is made in circumstances which would preclude the proper designation or appearance of a U.S. or NRC attorney on the employee's behalf, the employee shall respectfully request the demanding authority for sufficient time to obtain advice of counsel.

[55 FR 33649, Aug. 17, 1990]
#### EAUNUZELLE et al., Appellants, v. NEW YORK, N. H. & H. R. CO., Respondents.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

December 4, 1914.)

Action by Michael Eaunuzelle and another against the New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad Company. T. F. Donnelly, of New York City, for appellants. R. L. Luce, of New York City, for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Order filed.

SCOTT, J., dissents.
Editorial Note on Part 63
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 63 appear at 81 FR 86909, Dec. 2, 2016.

§ 63.304 Reasonable expectation. *Reasonable expectation* means that the Commission is satisfied that compliance will be achieved based upon the full record before it. Characteristics of reasonable expectation include that it: ( 1 ) Requires less than absolute proof because absolute proof is impossible to attain for disposal due to the uncertainty of projecting long-term performance;
( 2 ) Accounts for the inherently greater uncertainties in making long-term projections of the performance of the Yucca Mountain disposal system;
( 3 ) Does not exclude important parameters from assessments and analyses simply because they are difficult to precisely quantify to a high degree of confidence; and
( 4 ) Focuses performance assessments and analyses on the full range of defensible and reasonable parameter distributions rather than only upon extreme physical situations and parameter values.
EXHIBIT 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Dennis Vadura, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of AccuPoll Holding
Corp.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions);

(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.


March 14, 2005                                /s/ Dennis Vadura
                                              ----------------------------------
                                                  Dennis Vadura
                                                  Chief Executive Officer
# EUR-Lex - 31984R1548 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31984R1548

**Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1548/84 of 4 June 1984 amending Regulation No 467/67/EEC fixing the conversion rates, the processing costs and the value of the by-products for the various stages of rice processing **

*
Official Journal L 148 , 05/06/1984 P. 0016 - 0016 Spanish special edition: Chapter 03 Volume 30 P. 0244 Portuguese special edition Chapter 03 Volume 30 P. 0244 *

*****

COMMISSION REGULATION (EEC) No 1548/84

of 4 June 1984

amending Regulation No 467/67/EEC fixing the conversion rates, the processing costs and the value of the by-products for the various stages of rice processing

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN

COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 1418/76 of 21 June 1976 on the common organization of the market in rice (1), as last amended by Regulation (EEC) No 1025/84 (2), and in particular Article 19 thereof,

Whereas Article 2 (1) and (2) of Commission Regulation No 467/67/EEC (3), as last amended by Regulation (EEC) No 1999/83 (4), fixed the processing costs to be taken into consideration for certain processing stages; whereas, as a result of changes in prices, processing costs for these stages have also changed and these changes should be taken into account;

Whereas the measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

In Article 2 (1) and (2) of Regulation No 467/67/EEC, '43,73 ECU' is hereby replaced by '45,00 ECU'.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 1 September 1984.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 4 June 1984.

For the Commission

Poul DALSAGER

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ No L 166, 25. 6. 1976, p. 1.

(2) OJ No L 107, 19. 4. 1984, p. 13.

(3) OJ No 204, 24. 8. 1967, p. 1.

(4) OJ No L 196, 20. 7. 1983, p. 17.
226 So.2d 336

#### STATE of Louisiana v. Charles Ray MERGE.

No. 50118.

Sept. 17, 1969.

In re: Charles R. Merge applying for writ of mandamus.

Writ refused. The showing made does not warrant the exercise of our supervisory jurisdiction.
HPMSVtypeID yearID HPMSBaseYearVMT baseYearOffNetVMT 10 2024 9375025 0 20 2024 1351346800 0 30 2024 859546895 0 40 2024 5741815 0 50 2024 66113545 0 60 2024 120620820 0
PGI 225.870-7 Acceptance of Canadian

supplies.

(1) For contracts placed in Canada, either with the Canadian Commercial Corporation or directly

with Canadian suppliers, the Department of National Defence (Canada) will perform any necessary

contract quality assurance and/or acceptance, as applicable.

(2) Signature by the Department of National Defence (Canada) quality assurance representative on

the DoD inspection and acceptance form is satisfactory evidence of acceptance for payment

purposes.

Parent topic: PGI 225.870 Contracting with Canadian contractors.
`[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 654 Reported in House (RH)]







                                                 House Calendar No. 143
109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 654

                          [Report No. 109-367]

   Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to 
  consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on 
                                 Rules.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 31, 2006

   Mrs. Capito, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION


 
   Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to 
  consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on 
                                 Rules.

    Resolved, That the requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII for a 
two-thirds vote to consider a report from the Committee on Rules on the 
same day it is presented to the House is waived with respect to any 
resolution reported on the legislative day of February 1, 2006, 
providing for consideration or disposition of a bill to extend and 
modify authorities needed to combat terrorism, and for other purposes.
                                                 House Calendar No. 143

109th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                              H. RES. 654

                          [Report No. 109-367]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

   Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to 
  consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on 
                                 Rules.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            January 31, 2006

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed`
§ 783.1 Waiver. The Department of Energy, hereinafter “DOE”, waives its rights under section 152 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (66 Stat. 944) with respect to inventions and discoveries resulting from the use of the following materials and services: ( a ) Source materials, special nuclear materials, and heavy water distributed by DOE in accordance with the “Schedules of Base Charges for Materials Sold of Leased by DOE for Use in Private Atomic Energy Development and Base Prices Which DOE Will Pay for Certain Products From Private Reactors.”
( b ) Radioactive and stable isotopes, irradiation services (this waiver does not include inventions or discoveries made by DOE or DOE contractor personnel in the course of or in connection with the performance of an irradiation service), and radioactive material resulting from the performance of an irradiation service sold or distributed by DOE in accordance with the prices and charges established by: ( 1 ) Oak Ridge National Laboratory Inventory and Price List of electromagnetically enriched and other stable isotopes.
( 2 ) Oak Ridge National Laboratory Catalog and Price List of radioisotopes, special materials, and services.
( 3 ) Idaho National Engineering Laboratory Catalog of Price and charges on irradiation services at the materials testing reactor. The waiver does include inventions or discoveries made by sponsor personnel in the course of their use of the Gamma Irradiation Facility at the Idaho National Engineering Laboratory.
( 4 ) Argonne National Laboratory schedule of charges for irradiation services at its irradiation facilities.
( 5 ) Brookhaven National Laboratory schedule of prices and charges for irradiation services and radioisotopes.
#### § 611.104 [Reserved]
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. George Vennard, Appellant.

Appeals by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered September 28, 1967, and an order of said court dated January 4, 1968. The court is in receipt of a handwritten letter from appellant, dated February 13, 1970, stating that he wishes to withdraw the appeals, and a letter from his assigned counsel, dated March 31, 1970, that he consents to the withdrawal of the appeals. Under the circumstances, the court directs that the appeals be deemed withdrawn. Rabin, Acting P. J., Martuscello, Latham, Kleinfeld and Benjamin, JJ., concur.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

IN RE: ESTATE OF WILLIAM R.

ZIMMERMAN

PETITION OF: DIANA VONSCHLICHTEN :

:

:

:

: No. 30 MM 2019

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 29th day of May , 2019, the Petition for Leave to File Petition for

Allowance of Appeal Nunc Pro Tunc is DENIED.
§ 765.31 Designation of funds available for subsequent remedial action. ( a ) The Department shall authorize reimbursement of costs of remedial action, incurred in accordance with an approved plan for subsequent remedial action and approved by the Department as specified in subpart C to this part, to be made from the Fund. These costs are reimbursable until: ( 1 ) This remedial action has been completed, or
( 2 ) The licensee has been reimbursed its maximum reimbursement amount as determined by the Department pursuant to paragraph (e) of § 765.30.
( b ) A licensee shall submit any claim for reimbursement of costs of remedial action incurred pursuant to an approved plan for subsequent remedial action in accordance with the requirements of subpart C of this part. The Department shall approve, approve in part, or deny any claims in accordance with the procedures specified in subpart C of this part. The Department shall authorize the disbursement of funds upon approval of a claim for reimbursement.
( c ) After all remedial actions have been completed by affected Agreement State or NRC licensees, the Department will issue a Federal Register notice announcing a termination date beyond which claims for reimbursement will no longer be accepted.
[59 FR 26726, May 23, 1994, as amended at 68 FR 32958, June 3, 2003]