alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          25,004
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                   230
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    266,909
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        390,244
<ALLOWANCE>                                    (3,810)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 716,669
<DEPOSITS>                                     418,229
<SHORT-TERM>                                    92,462
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              4,004
<LONG-TERM>                                    160,917
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           12,048
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           485
<OTHER-SE>                                      28,524
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 716,669
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 14,656
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                8,834
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    27
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                23,517
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               6,100
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,569
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            9,948
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       60
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 303
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 10,328
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,530
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       3,530
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,275
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .74
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .71
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.14
<LOANS-NON>                                        310
<LOANS-PAST>                                         5
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 3,701
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      124
<RECOVERIES>                                       173
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                3,810
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             2,102
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          1,708


</TABLE>
Writ ofNiandainus Denied, Opinion issued October 11, 2012

In The 

## Q!nurt øf .ppaah 

## Fifth JhitricI uf Lixaei tt 

## Jit1n No. 0 5 -12-01351-CV IN RE REVEREND RES[IUNN D. ChAMBERS, TH.M., Relator Original Proceeding from the 192nd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No, DC-12-01540 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION [3efore Justices Moseley. FitzGerald, and Myers Opinion by Justice Moseley Relator contends the trialjudge erred in granting a plea in abatement. The facts and issues are well known to the parties, so we need not recount them herein, Based on the recordbefore us, we conclude relatorhas not shownhe is entitledto the reliefrequested. SeeTEx. R. App. P. 52.8(a); Walkerv. Packer, 827 S.W2d 833, 839-40 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding). Accordingly, weDENY relator’s petition for writ ofmandamus. 

# ‘\/ 

# //

I I J14MOSELEY 

## j ,F(JSTICE 121351F.P05
§ 780.3 Jurisdiction of the Patent Compensation Board. The Patent Compensation Board was established by section 157 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954. It was transferred to the Energy Research and Development Administration pursuant to section 104(d) of the Energy Reorganization Act of 1974 (42 U.S.C. 5814) and subsequently to the Department of Energy by section 301 of the Department of Energy Organization Act (42 U.S.C. 7151). Under section 157, the Board is given authority to determine reasonable royalty fees or resolve issues involving the grant of awards. In addition, the Board has authority: ( a ) To hear and make decisions as to compensation under section 173 of the Act (42 U.S.C. 2223) and the Invention Secrecy Act (35 U.S.C. 183);
( b ) To hear and make decisions as to whether a specific patent is affected with the public interest pursuant to section 153a of the Act;
( c ) To hear and make decisions as to whether a specific patent license should be granted under sections 153b(2) and 153e of the Act;
( d ) To give notices, hold hearings and take such other actions as may be necessary under section 153; and
( e ) To exercise all powers available under the Act and necessary for the performance of these duties, including the issuance of such rules of procedure as may be necessary.
IV 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 707 

Condemning the Government of Iran’s offer of assistance to Hamas, a known 

terrorist organization which currently controls the Palestinian Authority, 

and its call for other Arab nations to do the same, and the antiIsraeli and anti-American statements of the leaders of Iran. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 2, 2006 

Mr. GARRETT of New Jersey submitted the following resolution; which was 

referred to the Committee on International Relations 

RESOLUTION 

Condemning the Government of Iran’s offer of assistance 

to Hamas, a known terrorist organization which currently controls the Palestinian Authority, and its call 

for other Arab nations to do the same, and the antiIsraeli and anti-American statements of the leaders of 

Iran. 

Whereas the Government of Iran has offered financial assistance to Hamas, a known terrorist organization which 

currently controls the Palestinian Authority; 

Whereas Hamas has publicly declared its desire to destroy 

the State of Israel and the citizens of Israel; 

Whereas since September 2000, Palestinian terrorists have 

launched more than 17,000 attacks, killing more than 


wwhite on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 707 IH 

800 Israelis and wounding more than 5,000 others, and 

Hamas, either directly or through indirect financial incentives, is thought to be responsible for an overwhelming 

majority of these attacks; 

Whereas the Secretary of Iran’s Supreme National Security 

Council, Ali Larijani, stated that his country’s financial 

assistance to Hamas is an effort to ‘‘stand up against the 

oppression of America’’; 

Whereas Iranian Secretary Larijani also called on other Arab 

nations to similarly provide financial assistance beyond 

humanitarian assistance for the Palestinian people; 

Whereas the President of Iran, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, inexcusably and vehemently stated that, ‘‘Israel should be 

wiped off the map.’’; and 

Whereas Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice has stated, 

‘‘We’ve been very clear that Hamas is a terrorist group 

and it has to be disbanded, both for peace and security 

and in the Middle East and for the proper functioning 

of the Palestinian Authority.’’: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) condemns, in the strongest terms possible, 

3 the Government of Iran’s offer of assistance to 

4 Hamas, a known terrorist organization which cur5 rently controls the Palestinian Authority, and its call 

6 for other Arab nations to do the same; 

7 (2) condemns, in the strongest terms possible, 

8 the anti-Israeli and anti-American statements of the 

9 leaders of Iran; and 


wwhite on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
3 

•HRES 707 IH 

1 (3) expresses support for President George W. 

2 Bush, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, and the 

3 entire Administration for their efforts to deny assist4 ance to any organization that supports the policy of 

5 the destruction of the State of Israel. 

Æ 


wwhite on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Federal Aviation Administration

# AGENCY:

Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

# ACTION:

Notice of meetings; correction.

# SUMMARY:

                        This action corrects an error in the notice of meetings published in the                         **Federal Register**                         on Tuesday, November 30, 2010, concerning a proposal to revise Class B airspace at Philadelphia, PA. The name and phone number of the person to contact for further information has changed from that published in the notice.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

## History

                    On Tuesday, November 30, 2010, a notice of meetings was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     concerning a proposal to revise Class B airspace at Philadelphia, PA (75 FR 74127). The name and phone number of the person to contact for further information has subsequently been changed. This action provides the correct information.                

## Correction

In notice of meetings FR Doc. 2010-30085, as published on November 30, 2010 (75 FR 74127) on page 74127, column two, make the following correction:

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Dennis Sweeney, Philadelphia ATCT/TRACON, 15 Hog Island Road, Philadelphia, PA 19153;                         *telephone:*                         215-492-4100, extension 287.                    

Issued in Washington, DC, on December 14, 2010.

Edith V. Parish,

Manager, Airspace, Regulations and ATC Procedures Group.

[FR Doc. 2010-32048 Filed 12-20-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
EX-31Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications.

 

 

I, AdamTrebing, certify that:

 

1. Ihave reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required tobe filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of theWFRBS Commercial Mortgage Trust 2013-C11 (the "Exchange Act periodicreports");

 

2.Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, donot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3.Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other informationrequired to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this reportis included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4.Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in thisreport under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in theExchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligationsunder the servicing agreements in all material respects; and

 

5. Allof the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria forasset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment ofcompliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to beincluded in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB andExchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit tothisreport, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances ofnoncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report onForm 10-K.

 

Ingiving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on informationprovided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:

 

WellsFargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, CWCapital AssetManagement LLC, as Special Servicer, U.S. Bank Trust Company, NationalAssociation, as Trustee, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as CertificateAdministrator, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Custodian, FintechTrust Advisors LLC d.b.a. CRED iQ, as Trust Advisor, CoreLogic Solutions, LLC,as Servicing Function Participant, PGIM Real Estate Loan Services, Inc.(formerly known as Prudential Asset Resources, Inc.), as Primary Servicer,Computershare Trust Company, National Association, as Servicing Function Participantfor the Certificate Administrator, and Computershare Trust Company, NationalAssociation, as Servicing Function Participant for the Custodian.

 

 

 

Dated: March 29, 2024

 

 

/s/Adam Trebing

AdamTrebing

President

(seniorofficer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway,

 Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

May 26, 2010 

p0519 

Order 

 

May 26, 2010 

140008 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 140008 

 COA: 291953 

Wayne CC: 05-001277-01 

REGINALD JEROME RIGGINS, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 24, 2009 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
Library of CongressMARC**Holdings**

----

----

----

This online publication provides access to both the full and  concise versions of the *MARC 21 Format for Holdings  Data*. The "full" holdings format contains detailed  descriptions of every data element, along with examples, input  conventions, and history sections. The "concise" holdings  format contains abridged descriptions of every data element,  along with examples. The full and concise versions are  identified in the header of each field description.

Changes to the *MARC 21 Format for Holdings Data*  that resulted from Update No. 38 (June 2024) are displayed  in red print. The date  located in the header of the full version of each field  indicates the last month and year of update.

----

    - /www.loc.gov/marc/holdings/hdintro.html">Introduction
    - /www.loc.gov/marc/holdings/hdsummary.html">Format      Summary
    - /www.loc.gov/marc/holdings/hdleader.html">Leader
    - /www.loc.gov/marc/holdings/hddirectory.html">Directory
    - /www.loc.gov/marc/holdings/hd00x.html">00X: Control      Fields
    - /www.loc.gov/marc/holdings/hd0xx.html">0XX: Number      and Code Fields
    - /www.loc.gov/marc/holdings/hd5xx84x.html">3XX, 5XX,      84X: Note Fields
    - /www.loc.gov/marc/holdings/hd852856.html">852, 856, 857: Location and Access Fields
    - /www.loc.gov/marc/holdings/hd853878.html">Holdings      Data--General Information
    - /www.loc.gov/marc/holdings/hd853855.html">853-855:      Captions and Pattern Fields
    - /www.loc.gov/marc/holdings/hd863865.html">863-865:      Enumeration and Chronology Fields
    - /www.loc.gov/marc/holdings/hd866868.html">866-868:      Textual Holdings Statement Fields
    - /www.loc.gov/marc/holdings/hd876878.html">876-878:      Item Information Fields
    - /www.loc.gov/marc/holdings/hd88x.html">88X: Other      Variable Fields
    - /www.loc.gov/marc/holdings/echdcntf.html">Appendix      A: Control Subfields
    - /www.loc.gov/marc/holdings/examples.html">Appendix      B: Full Level Record Examples
    - /www.loc.gov/marc/holdings/echdmulti.html">Appendix      C: Multiscript Records
    - /www.loc.gov/marc/holdings/hdapndxd.html">Appendix      D: ANSI/NISO, ISO and MARC 21
    - /www.loc.gov/marc/holdings/hdapndxe.html">Appendix      E: Glossary
    - /www.loc.gov/marc/holdings/hdapndxf.html">Appendix      F: Format Changes for Update No. 38 (June 2024) 
    - /www.loc.gov/marc/holdings/echdorg.html">Appendix G:      Organization Code Sources

----

Library of CongressMARC**Holdings**

(06/07/24)

Contact Us
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-4571

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

v. 

WILLIAM BARNES, 

 Defendant - Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, Senior District Judge. 

(8:06-cr-00131-RWT-11) 

Submitted: June 19, 2014 Decided: July 7, 2014

Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. 

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Carmen D. Hernandez, Highland, Maryland, for Appellant. Rod J. 

Rosenstein, United States Attorney, James A. Crowell, IV, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Jennifer R. Sykes, Special 

Assistant United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for 

Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2

PER CURIAM: 

William Barnes appeals the district court’s judgment 

revoking his supervised release and imposing a nine-month prison 

term and a three-year, nine-month term of supervised release. 

The only issues Barnes raises on appeal challenge the district 

court’s decision to impose the nine-month prison term. Because 

Barnes’ appeal is moot, we dismiss it. 

Barnes’ term of supervised release began in

March 2013. In April 2013, the probation officer petitioned the 

district court to revoke Barnes’ supervised release, alleging 

that he had violated three terms of his supervised release. 

After a hearing, the district court determined that Barnes had 

violated those terms. Accordingly, the court revoked Barnes’

supervised release and sentenced him to nine months’ 

imprisonment and a three-year, nine-month term of supervised 

release. 

During the pendency of this appeal, Barnes was 

released from imprisonment. Accordingly, his arguments 

challenging the district court’s imposition of the nine-month 

prison term are moot. See United States v. Hardy, 545 F.3d 280, 

284-85 (4th Cir. 2008) (noting that appellant’s release from 

prison during pendency of appeal mooted challenge to revocation 

of supervised release and imposition of prison sentence); 

Friedman’s, Inc. v. Dunlap, 290 F.3d 191, 197 (4th Cir. 2002) 
3

(whether this court is “presented with a live case or 

controversy is a question [the court] may raise sua sponte since 

mootness goes to the heart of the Article III jurisdiction of 

the courts” (internal quotation marks omitted)). 

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal as moot. 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
§ 603.845 Data rights requirements. ( a ) If the TIA is a cooperative agreement, the requirements at 10 CFR 600.325(d), Rights in data-general rule, apply. The “Rights in Data—General” provision in Appendix A to Subpart D of 10 CFR 600 normally applies. This provision provides the Government with unlimited rights in data first produced in the performance of the agreement, except as provided in paragraph (c) Copyright. However, in certain circumstances, the “Rights in Data—Programs Covered Under Special Protected Data Statutes” provision in Appendix A may apply.
( b ) If the TIA is an assistance transaction other than a cooperative agreement, the requirements at 10 CFR 600.325(e), Rights in data—programs covered under special protected data statutes, normally apply. The “Rights in Data—Programs Covered Under Special Data Statutes” provision in Appendix A to Subpart D of 10 CFR 600 may be modified to accommodate particular circumstances (e.g., access to or expanded use rights in protected data among consortium or team members), or to list data or categories of data that the recipient must make available to the public. In unique cases, the contracting officer may negotiate special data rights requirements that vary from those in 10 CFR 600.325. Modifications to the standard data provisions must be approved by intellectual property counsel.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 370 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 370

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                         July 22, 2005.
    Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker 
may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XVIII, declare the House resolved into the 
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of the 
bill (H.R. 3070) to reauthorize the human space flight, aeronautics, and science 
programs of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, and for other 
purposes. The first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. All points of 
order against consideration of the bill are waived. General debate shall be 
confined to the bill and shall not exceed one hour equally divided and 
controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on 
Science. After general debate the bill shall be considered for amendment under 
the five-minute rule. It shall be in order to consider as an original bill for 
the purpose of amendment under the five-minute rule the amendment in the nature 
of a substitute recommended by the Committee on Science now printed in the bill. 
The committee amendment in the nature of a substitute shall be considered as 
read. All points of order against the committee amendment in the nature of a 
substitute are waived. Notwithstanding clause 11 of rule XVIII, no amendment to 
the committee amendment in the nature of a substitute shall be in order except 
those printed in the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this 
resolution. Each such amendment may be offered only in the order printed in the 
report, may be offered only by a Member designated in the report, shall be 
considered as read, shall be debatable for the time specified in the report 
equally divided and controlled by the proponent and an opponent, shall not be 
subject to amendment, and shall not be subject to a demand for division of the 
question in the House or in the Committee of the Whole. All points of order 
against such amendments are waived. At the conclusion of consideration of the 
bill for amendment the Committee shall rise and report the bill to the House 
with such amendments as may have been adopted. Any Member may demand a separate 
vote in the House on any amendment adopted in the Committee of the Whole to the 
bill or to the committee amendment in the nature of a substitute. The previous 
question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to 
final passage without intervening motion except one motion to recommit with or 
without instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```