alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Angeles
Partners 16 1997 Third Quarter 10-QSB and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such 10-QSB filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000812187
<NAME> ANGELES PARTNERS 16
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                             466
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       15
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                          11,876
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,498
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  10,686
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                         13,564
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (5,866)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    10,686
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,991
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,450
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 971
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (237)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (237)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (237)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (16.79)<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet.
<F2>Multiplier is 1.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
#### § 765.1 Purpose.

The provisions of this part establish regulatory requirements governing reimbursement for certain costs of remedial action at active uranium or thorium processing sites as specified by Subtitle A of Title X of the Energy Policy Act of 1992. These regulations are authorized by section 1002 of the Act (42 U.S.C. 2296a-1), which requires the Secretary to issue regulations governing the reimbursements.
§ 431.385 Cessation of distribution of a basic model of an electric motor. ( a ) In the event that a model of an electric motor is determined non-compliant by the Department in accordance with § 431.192 or if a manufacturer or private labeler determines a model of an electric motor to be in noncompliance, then the manufacturer or private labeler shall: ( 1 ) Immediately cease distribution in commerce of the basic model.
( 2 ) Give immediate written notification of the determination of noncompliance, to all persons to whom the manufacturer has distributed units of the basic model manufactured since the date of the last determination of compliance.
( 3 ) Pursuant to a request made by the Secretary, provide the Department within 30 days of the request, records, reports, and other documentation pertaining to the acquisition, ordering, storage, shipment, or sale of a basic model determined to be in noncompliance.
( 4 ) The manufacturer may modify the non-compliant basic model in such manner as to make it comply with the applicable performance standard. Such modified basic model shall then be treated as a new basic model and must be certified in accordance with the provisions of this subpart; except that in addition to satisfying all requirements of this subpart, the manufacturer shall also maintain records that demonstrate that modifications have been made to all units of the new basic model prior to distribution in commerce.
( b ) If a basic model is not properly certified in accordance with the requirements of this subpart, the Secretary may seek, among other remedies, injunctive action to prohibit distribution in commerce of such basic model.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Martin J. Fitzpatrick, Petitioner.

Application unanimously denied. Memorandum: The Oneida County Grand Jury returned an indictment accusing petitioner of murder in four counts. Petitioner made an application in County Court to waive a jury trial upon the ground that the indictment did not allege that the victim was a police officer who was killed in the course of performing his official duties. The court denied the motion upon the ground that the People contended that they would establish upon the trial that petitioner committed a robbery and, while fleeing therefrom, shot two peace officers who were engaged at the time in performing their duties and that, in these circumstances, it was not authorized to approve the waiver. Section 2 of article I of the Constitution provides that a jury trial may not be waived when the crime charged may be punishable by death. Under section 125.30 of the Penal Law a defendant may be sentenced to death when the victim was a peace officer who was killed in the performance of his duties. Petitioner also moved to dismiss the indictment upon the ground that the applicable homicide statutes with respect to a sentence for murder are on the face unconstitutional in that, among other things, they permit any relevant evidence not privileged to be received regardless of its admissibility under the exclusionary rules of evidence. The court held the statutes to be valid. This proceeding in the nature of prohibition instituted in this court seeks to enjoin the Oneida County Court from exceeding its authorized powers in a proceeding over which it has jurisdiction and raises the identical contentions presented in the court below. Petitioner argues that prohibition *731furnishes the more effective remedy available and that there is no other adequate remedy. Upon the record, we conclude that the questions presented can be adequately reviewed on appeal. In *Matter of Hogan*v. *Court of General Sessions*(296 N. Y. 1) the court said at pages 8-9: “ The remedy [prohibition] is an extraordinary one which lies within the discretion of the court. Although ordinarily employed to restrain a subordinate tribunal from entertaining a cause or proceeding over which it has no jurisdiction [cases cited], it may be exercised also to enjoin a lower court from exceeding its authorized powers in a proceeding over which it has jurisdiction. [Cases cited] The writ does not issue where the grievance can be redressed by ordinary proceedings at law or in equity or merely to prevent error which may be readily corrected on appeal.” (Application for an order prohibiting Oneida County Court from proceeding with trial.) Present—Goldman, P. J., Del Vecchio, Witmer, Gabrielli and Bastow, J J.
H. Res. 696 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

January 18, 2018. 

Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall 

be in order to take from the Speaker’s table the bill (H.R. 

195) to amend title 44, United States Code, to restrict the 

distribution of free printed copies of the Federal Register to 

Members of Congress and other officers and employees of the 

United States, and for other purposes, with the Senate 

amendment thereto, and to consider in the House, without 

intervention of any point of order, a motion offered by the 

chair of the Committee on Appropriations or his designee 

that the House concur in the Senate amendment with an 

amendment consisting of the text of Rules Committee Print 

115–55. The Senate amendment and the motion shall be considered as read. The motion shall be debatable for one hour 

equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on Appropriations. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the motion 

to its adoption without intervening motion. 
2 

•HRES 696 EH 

SEC. 2. The requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII for 

a two-thirds vote to consider a report from the Committee on 

Rules on the same day it is presented to the House is waived 

with respect to any resolution reported through the legislative 

day of January 20, 2018. 

SEC. 3. It shall be in order at any time through the legislative day of January 20, 2018, for the Speaker to entertain 

motions that the House suspend the rules as though under 

clause 1 of rule XV. The Speaker or his designee shall consult with the Minority Leader or her designee on the designation of any matter for consideration pursuant to this section. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

# AGENCY:

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC).

# ACTION:

Notice of renewal of the FDIC Advisory Committee on Economic Inclusion.

# SUMMARY:

Pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (“FACA”), 5 U.S.C. App. 2, and after consultation with the General Services Administration, the Chairman of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation has determined that renewal of the FDIC Advisory Committee on Economic Inclusion (“the Committee”) is in the public interest in connection with the performance of duties imposed upon the FDIC by law. The Committee has been a successful undertaking by the FDIC and has provided valuable feedback to the agency on important initiatives focused on expanding access to banking services by underserved populations. The Committee will continue to provide advice and recommendations on initiatives to expand access to banking services by underserved populations. The Committee will continue to review various issues that may include, but not be limited to, basic retail financial services such as check cashing, money orders, remittances, stored value cards, short-term loans, savings accounts, and other services to promote asset accumulation and financial stability. The structure and responsibilities of the Committee are unchanged from when it was originally established in November 2006. The Committee will continue to operate in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Mr. Robert E. Feldman, Committee Management Officer of the FDIC, at (202) 898-7043.

Dated: December 21, 2010.

Valerie J. Best,

Assistant Committee Management Officer, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

[FR Doc. 2010-32502 Filed 12-27-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6714-01-P
CASE ANNOUNCEMENTS

*December 12, 2007*

[Cite as *12/12/2007 Case Announcements,*2007-Ohio-6518.]

MERIT DECISIONS WITHOUT OPINIONS

2007-1781.

#### State ex rel. Nash v. Court of Appeals, Eighth Appellate Dist.

In Mandamus. On respondents’ motion to dismiss and relator’s motion to strike the motion to dismiss. Motion to strike denied. Motion to dismiss granted. Cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.
Editorial Note on Part 725
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 725 appear at 88 FR 41292, June 26, 2023.

§ 725.22 Scope of permit. ( a ) All access permits will as a minimum authorize access, subject to the terms and conditions of the access permit to confidential restricted data in all of the categories set forth in appendix A to this part, except C-91 and C-24.
( b ) In addition, access permits may authorize access, subject to the terms and conditions of the access permit to such Secret Restricted Data as is included within the particular category or categories specified in the permit.
( c ) In addition, access permits may authorize access, subject to the terms and conditions of the access permit, to such government confidential commercial information as is included within the particular category or categories specified in the permit.
[41 FR 56778, Dec. 30, 1976, as amended at 52 FR 30139, Aug. 13, 1987]
ESA, NHPA, and Tribal 

Consultation Documents 

MCU Facility PSD Permit 

Amendment
#### Ellis *et al*v. Ellis.

*Bill in Equity lo Enjoin Action of Ejectment.*

1. *Sale of lands by administrator; ejectment by heir.*— Where an administrator sells lands of his intestate under a void order of the Probate Court, and the purchase-money is paid to and used by the administrator in paying debts of the estate, and the balance thereof is turned over to the guardian of the minor heirs of the intestate and applied to their benefit, such minor heirs, not having make or tendered restitution of the purchase-money, are estopped from asserting title to the prejudice of the purchaser or his privies; affirmed on authority of *Jlobertson v. Bradford,*73 Ala. 116.

Appeal from Pike Chancery Court.

Heard before Hon. John A. Poster.

Gardner *&*Wiley, for appellants.

Parks & Son, *contra. ■*

STONE, C, J.

The decree of the chancellor is affirmed on the authority of *Robertson v. Bradford,*73 Ala. 116.
SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

Case No. 6D23-1315

Lower Tribunal No. 2021-CA-008420-O

_____________________________

MAYLIN MASO,

Appellant,

v.

SECURITY FIRST INSURANCE COMPANY d/b/a SECURITY FIRST FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County.

Kevin B. Weiss, Judge.

December 15, 2023

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the trial court’s final order dismissing Appellant's complaint and 

remand for further proceedings consistent with our opinion in Hughes v. Universal 

Property & Casualty Insurance Co., No. 6D23-296, 2023 WL 8108671 (Fla. 6th 

DCA Nov. 22, 2023).

1

 Also consistent with Hughes, we certify conflict with Cole 

1 This case was transferred from the Fifth District Court of Appeal to this 

Court on January 1, 2023.
2

v. Universal Property & Casualty Insurance Co., 363 So. 3d 1089 (Fla. 4th DCA 

2023).

REVERSED and REMANDED.

STARGEL, NARDELLA and GANNAM, JJ., concur.

Kenneth R. Duboff, of Duboff Law Firm, North Miami, for Appellant.

C. DeWitt Revels, III, and Celeste Murphy-Gerling, of Walker, Revels, Greninger, 

PLLC, Orlando, for Appellee.

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING 

AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED
REGULATORY EVALUATION

Directorate Identifier: 2011-NM-251-AD

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific 

requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of 

transportation?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)
#### § 707.8 Applicant drug testing.

An applicant for a testing designated position will be tested for the use of illegal drugs before final selection for employment or assignment to such a position. Provisions of this part do not prohibit contractors from conducting drug testing on applicants for employment in any position.
Editorial Note on Part 55
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 55 appear at 80 FR 74980, Dec. 1, 2015.

§ 55.71 Violations. ( a ) The Commission may obtain an injunction or other court order to prevent a violation of the provisions of— ( 1 ) The Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended;
( 2 ) Title II of the Energy Reorganization Act of 1974, as amended; or
( 3 ) A regulation or order issued pursuant to those Acts.
( b ) The Commission may obtain a court order for the payment of a civil penalty imposed under section 234 of the Atomic Energy Act: ( 1 ) For violations of— ( i ) Sections 53, 57, 62, 63, 81, 82, 101, 103, 104, 107, or 109 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended;
( ii ) Section 206 of the Energy Reorganization Act;
( iii ) Any rule, regulation, or order issued pursuant to the sections specified in paragraph (b)(1)(i) of this section;
( iv ) Any term, condition, or limitation of any license issued under the sections specified in paragraph (b)(1)(i) of this section.
( 2 ) For any violation for which a license may be revoked under section 186 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended.
[57 FR 55076, Nov. 24, 1992]
#### § 905.24 Will Western conduct reviews of this program?

Yes, Western may periodically initiate a public process to review the regulations in this subpart to determine whether they should be revised to reflect changes in technology, needs, or other developments.
#### § 904.6 Charge for capacity and firm energy.

The charge for Capacity and Firm Energy from the Project shall be composed of two separate charges; a charge to provide for the basic revenue requirements, as identified in paragraphs (b), (c), and (d) of § 904.5 of these General Regulations (Base Charge), and a charge to provide the surplus revenue for the Lower Colorado River Basin Development Fund contribution, as identified in paragraph (e) of § 904.5 of these General Regulations (Lower Basin Development Fund Contribution Charge).
IV 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 428 

Expressing the sincere gratitude of the House of Representatives to the 

foreign individuals, organizations, and governments that have offered 

material assistance and other forms of support to those who have been 

affected by Hurricane Katrina. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 7, 2005 

Mr. HYDE (for himself and Mr. LANTOS) submitted the following resolution; 

which was referred to the Committee on International Relations 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sincere gratitude of the House of Representatives to the foreign individuals, organizations, and governments that have offered material assistance and other 

forms of support to those who have been affected by 

Hurricane Katrina. 

Whereas Hurricane Katrina struck the Gulf Coast of the 

United States with devastating effect on August 29, 

2005; 

Whereas the United States has a long history of humanitarian response to other countries that have experienced 

disasters of similar magnitude; 
2 

•HRES 428 IH 

Whereas soon after the scope of the destruction became evident, assistance was offered by foreign individuals, organizations, and governments; and 

Whereas numerous messages of condolence and support for 

the people of the United States have been sent to the 

President and Congress and to government authorities in 

the affected area: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives ex2 presses its sincere gratitude to the foreign individuals, or3 ganizations, and governments that have offered material 

4 assistance and other forms of support to those who have 

5 been affected by Hurricane Katrina. 

6 SEC. 2. The Clerk of the House of Representatives 

7 shall transmit enrolled copies of this resolution to the Sec8 retary of State with a request that the Secretary transmit 

9 the copies to the foreign governments described in this res10 olution. 

Æ
# PGI 225.7203 Contracting officer distribution of reports.

             (a) Before contract award, forward a copy of any reports that are submitted with offers in accordance with the provision at 252.225-7003, Report of Intended Performance Outside the United States and Canada—Submission with Offer, to the Office of the Principal Director (Contract Policy) via email to osd.pentagon.ousd-a-s.mbx.asda-dp-c-contractpolicy@mail.mil.           

             (b)              Forwarding the reports as described in paragraph (a) of this section is necessary to satisfy the requirement of 10 U.S.C. 4603 that notifications (or copies) of contract performance outside the United States and Canada be maintained in compiled form for 5 years after the date of submission. 

**Parent topic:**PGI 225.72 -REPORTING CONTRACT PERFORMANCE OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES
#### In re THANASULES.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

February 11, 1915.)

In the matter of Antonio A. Thanasules, deceased.

No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Order filed.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Availability of ground-waterdata for California, water year**
 
1999 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005| 2006 | 2007| 2008 | 2009| 2010
 
SuDoc Number:I 19.127/4:
Item Number:0621-L-03 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000825503
 
February 18, 2020
§ 830.121 Quality Assurance Program (QAP). ( a ) Contractors conducting activities, including providing items or services, that affect, or may affect, the nuclear safety of DOE nuclear facilities must conduct work in accordance with the Quality Assurance criteria in § 830.122.
( b ) The contractor responsible for a DOE nuclear facility must: ( 1 ) Submit a QAP to DOE for approval and regard the QAP as approved 90 days after submittal, unless it is approved or rejected by DOE at an earlier date.
( 2 ) Modify the QAP as directed by DOE.
( 3 ) Annually submit any changes to the DOE-approved QAP to DOE for approval. Justify in the submittal why the changes continue to satisfy the quality assurance requirements.
( 4 ) Conduct work in accordance with the QAP.
( c ) The QAP must: ( 1 ) Describe how the quality assurance criteria of § 830.122 are satisfied.
( 2 ) Integrate the quality assurance criteria with the Safety Management System, or describe how the quality assurance criteria apply to the Safety Management System.
( 3 ) Use voluntary consensus standards in its development and implementation, where practicable and consistent with contractual and regulatory requirements, and identify the standards used.
( 4 ) Describe how the contractor responsible for the nuclear facility ensures that subcontractors and suppliers satisfy the criteria of § 830.122.