alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1134.110 Performance reporting for non-construction awards. ( a ) *OMB guidance.* OMB guidance in 2 CFR 200.328(f) states that an agency may waive any performance report that it does not need.
( b ) *DoD implementation* — ( 1 ) *Interim reports.* DoD Components should waive requirements for interim performance reports under non-construction awards, including research awards, only when program managers have an alternative source for the information that the reports provide in support of the need for technical program oversight during the period of performance.
( 2 ) *Final reports* — ( i ) *Research.* DoD Components may not waive requirements for final performance reports under research awards, even when program managers have other sources of the information they contain. A primary purpose of a final report under a research award is to document the overall project or program well enough to serve as a long-term reference from which others may understand the purpose, scope, approach, results or outcomes, and conclusions or recommendations of the research.
( ii ) *Non-construction awards other than research.* DoD Components should consider the long-term value of final performance reports for documenting program outcomes, as well as any near-term value, before waiving requirements for final reports under other non-construction awards.
( c ) *Award terms and conditions.* Appendix A to this part provides a template for REP Article I of the general terms and conditions of research awards or other non-construction awards under which performance reports are required. A DoD Component must either use the wording that appendix A provides or insert wording into the template, in accordance with §§ 1134.115 through 1134.145, to: ( 1 ) Specify the content and form, format, or data elements recipients must use for interim and final performance reporting (see § 1134.115);
( 2 ) Specify the reporting frequency, reporting periods, and due dates for interim performance reports (see § 1134.120);
( 3 ) Specify the due dates and reporting periods for final performance reports (see § 1134.125);
( 4 ) Specify that recipients may request extensions of due dates for performance reports (see § 1134.130);
( 5 ) Require recipients to report significant developments (see § 1134.135);
( 6 ) Specify reporting procedures (see § 1134.140); and
( 7 ) Reserve the DoD Component's right to make site visits (see § 1134.145).
PROTEGI

B= ninguna circunstancia el Servicio de Impuestos Internos (IRS) permitira la

discriminaci6n hacia los contribuyentes por parte de sus empleados, o individuos que

son voluntarios o trabajan en los centros de Talleres para Contribuyentes de Bajos
Recursos (LITC), Asistencia Voluntaria al Contribuyente (VITA) y Asesoramiento Tributario para
Ancianos (TCE). Ningtin contribuyente estara sujeto a discriminacion sexual en los programas o
actividades de educacion patrocinados por el Servicio de Impuestos Internos — Departamento
del Tesoro, ni estara sujeto a discriminacion por la raza, el color de la piel, el origen de
nacionalidad, las represalias, la discapacidad o la edad en los programas o actividades
patrocinados por el Servicio de Impuestos Internos — Departamento del Tesoro.

Los contribuyentes que tengan una discapacidad pueden solicitar adaptaciones razonables
si desean participar en, o recibir beneficios de, un programa o actividad patrocinado por el
Servicio de Impuestos Internos — Departamento del Tesoro. Nuestros empleados, y nuestros
Coordinadores y Supervisores de los centros LITC, VITA y TCE, son los responsables de
asegurar que se conceda toda solicitud de adaptaci6n razonable, hecha por una persona que
tenga discapacidad y que retina los requisitos para solicitarla.

Si, a una persona que tenga discapacidad y que retina los requisitos, no se le concede
adaptaciones razonables después de solicitarlas, o si una persona entiende que se le ha
discriminado por su sexo, raza, color de piel, origen de nacionalidad, discapacidad, represalias
o edad, él o ella pueden presentar una queja escrita contra un empleado, el Coordinador o
Supervisor de un Centro, o el Servicio de Impuestos Internos —- Departamento del Tesoro. Todas
las quejas escritas deben ser enviadas a:

Operations Director, Civil Rights Division Para todas las preguntas concernientes a los derechos
Internal Revenue Service civiles del contribuyente, comuniquese a la direccion
que aparece a la izquierda o envienos un correo

1111 Constitution Avenue, NW electronico a
Room 2413

Washington, DC 20224

Publication 4053 (SP) (Rev, 10-2012) Catalog Number 34304X Department of the Treasury Internal Revenue Service www.irs.gov IRS
# EUR-Lex - 31990D0647 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31990D0647

**90/647/EEC: Council Decision of 24 September 1990 concerning the conclusion of the agreement between the European economic community and the people's republic of china on trade in textile products **

*
Official Journal L 352 , 15/12/1990 P. 0001 - 0073 *

COUNCIL DECISION

of 24 September 1990

concerning the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Economic Community and the People's Republic of China on trade in textile products

(90/647/EEC)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community, and in particular Article 113 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the Commission,

Whereas the Agreement negotiated between the European Economic Community and the People's Republic of China

on trade in textile products initialled in Brussels on

9 December 1988 and applied on a provisional basis by Decision 88/656/EEC (1), as from 1 January 1989, should be approved,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The Agreement between the European Economic Community and the People's Republic of China on trade

in textile products is hereby approved on behalf of the Community.

The text of the agreement is attached to the Decision.

Article 2

The President of the Council is hereby authorized to designate the person empowered to sign the above Agreement in order to bind this Community.

Done at Brussels, 24 September 1990.

For the Council

The President

V. SACCOMANDI

(1) OJ N° L 380, 31. 12. 1988, p. 1.
###### Editorial Note on Part 9

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 9 appear at 82 FR 52825, Nov. 15, 2017.

#### § 9.95 Specific exemptions.

Exemptions applicable to Privacy Act Systems of Records are stated in each Privacy Act System of Records Notice which is published in the Federal Register and is available at the NRC Web site, *http://www.nrc.gov.*

[70 FR 34309, June 14, 2005]
873.118 Debriefings.       Offerors whose proposals are not accepted under a competitive request for proposals (RFP) may submit a written request for a debriefing to the contracting officer. Without regard to FAR 15.505, preaward debriefings may be conducted by the contracting officer when determined to be in the best interest of the Government. Post-award debriefings shall be conducted in accordance with FAR 15.506. (38 U.S.C. 8153)    **Parent topic:** PART 873 - SIMPLIFIED PROCEDURES FOR HEALTH-CARE RESOURCES
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-7041

HOWARD PIERCE,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; WILLIAM DAVIS,

Warden; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF SOUTH

CAROLINA; MICHAEL MOORE, Director,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Columbia. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District

Judge. (CA-95-680-3BC)

Submitted: January 18, 1996 Decided: February 15, 1996

Before HAMILTON and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Howard Pierce, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy

Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the magistrate judge's order denying Appellant's motion for the appointment of counsel. We dismiss the appeal

for lack of jurisdiction because the order is not appealable. This

court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C.

§ 1291 (1988), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders. 28

U.S.C. § 1292 (1988); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial

Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order here appealed is

neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral

order.

We deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss

the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
§ 1138.105 Content of SUB Article I. ( a ) *Requirement.* A DoD Component's general terms and conditions must: ( 1 ) Require the recipient to determine the nature of transactions it makes under its award; and
( 2 ) Inform the recipient about the effect of that determination on the procedures for awarding the transaction and the transaction's terms and conditions.
( b ) *Award terms and conditions.* A DoD Component's general terms and conditions must use the wording appendix A to this part provides for SUB Article I.
EX-31 Rule13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications.

 

 

I, Leland F. Bunch,III, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewedthis report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respectof the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of the Morgan Stanley Bank ofAmerica Merrill Lynch Trust 2013-C8 (the "Exchange Act periodicreports");

 

2. Based on myknowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3. Based on myknowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required tobe provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is includedin the Exchange Act periodic reports; 

 

4. Based on myknowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report underItem 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Actperiodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under theservicing agreements in all material respects; and

 

5. All of the reportson assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securitiesand their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance withservicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in thisreport in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except asotherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliancedescribed in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving thecertifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me bythe following unaffiliated parties:

 

Wells Fargo Bank,National Association, as Master Servicer, Colony Capital AMC OPCO, LLC (f/k/aColony NorthStar AMC OPCO, LLC, as Special Servicer, U.S. Bank NationalAssociation, as Trustee, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as CertificateAdministrator, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Custodian, SitusHoldings, LLC, as Trust Advisor, CoreLogic Commercial Real Estate Services,Inc., as Servicing Function Participant, National Tax Search, LLC, as ServicingFunction Participant, Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, NationalAssociation, as Primary Servicer for the Chrysler East Building Mortgage Loan,Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, as SpecialServicer for the Chrysler East Building Mortgage Loan, U.S. Bank NationalAssociation, as Trustee for the Chrysler East Building Mortgage Loan, WellsFargo Bank, National Association, as Custodian for the Chrysler East BuildingMortgage Loan, and Situs Holdings, LLC, as Trust Advisor for the Chrysler EastBuilding Mortgage Loan.

 

 

 

Dated: May 4, 2020

 

 

/s/ Leland F. Bunch,III

President and ChiefExecutive Officer

(seniorofficer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Robert McCray, Chief Financial Officer of Sionix Corporation, certify that:

         1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Sionix
Corporation:

         2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
quarterly report;

         3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly represent in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

         4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

                  a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during this period in which the quarterly report is being prepared;

                  b. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

                  c. presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about
the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

         5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent function):

                  a. all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

                  b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
internal controls; and

         6. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in
this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

 Date: August14, 2003

 /s/ Robert McCray
------------------------------
   Robert McCray
   Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
      THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF SPECTRUM INFORMATION
TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND ITS SUBSIDIARY AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                  1000

<S>                                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                          6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                     SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                                   645
<SECURITIES>                                               0
<RECEIVABLES>                                             39
<ALLOWANCES>                                               0
<INVENTORY>                                                0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         732
<PP&E>                                                    50
<DEPRECIATION>                                             1
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                         1,065
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    238
<BONDS>                                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                      0
<PREFERRED>                                                0
<COMMON>                                                   8
<OTHER-SE>                                               819
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                           1,065
<SALES>                                                    0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                           0
<CGS>                                                      0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                              5
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                           0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                           0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                         0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                        (456)
<INCOME-TAX>                                               0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    (516)
<DISCONTINUED>                                            60
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                            0
<CHANGES>                                                  0
<NET-INCOME>                                           (456)
<EPS-BASIC>                                         (.056)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         (.056)



</TABLE>
§ 1138.1105 Content of SUB Article XI. ( a ) *Requirement.* A DoD Component's general terms and conditions must address requirements that recipients must include in subawards to entities that may make lower-tier subawards.
( b ) *Award terms and conditions.* A DoD Component's general terms and conditions must use the wording appendix K to this part provides for SUB Article XI.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 717 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 717

    Directing the Secretary of Commerce to transmit to the House of 
Representatives a copy of a workforce globalization final draft report 
               produced by the Technology Administration.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 9, 2006

  Mr. Gordon (for himself, Mr. Costello, Ms. Eddie Bernice Johnson of 
  Texas, Ms. Woolsey, Ms. Hooley, Mr. Udall of Colorado, Mr. Wu, Mr. 
   Honda, Mr. Miller of North Carolina, Mr. Davis of Tennessee, Mr. 
    Lipinski, Ms. Jackson-Lee of Texas, Mr. Sherman, Mr. Baird, Mr. 
Matheson, Mr. Costa, Mr. Al Green of Texas, Mr. Melancon, Mr. Moore of 
Kansas, and Mr. Carnahan) submitted the following resolution; which was 
                  referred to the Committee on Science

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
    Directing the Secretary of Commerce to transmit to the House of 
Representatives a copy of a workforce globalization final draft report 
               produced by the Technology Administration.

    Resolved, That the Secretary of Commerce is directed to transmit to 
the House of Representatives, not later than 14 days after the date of 
the adoption of this resolution, a copy of the final draft report, 
produced by the professional staff of the Technology Administration, 
entitled: ``Six-Month Assessment of Workforce Globalization In Certain 
Knowledge-Based Industries''.
                                 <all>
```
§ 835.206 Limits for the embryo/fetus. ( a ) The equivalent dose limit for the embryo/fetus from the period of conception to birth, as a result of occupational exposure of a declared pregnant worker, is 0.5 rem (0.005 Sv).
( b ) Substantial variation above a uniform exposure rate that would satisfy the limits provided in § 835.206(a) shall be avoided.
( c ) If the equivalent dose to the embryo/fetus is determined to have already exceeded 0.5 rem (0.005 Sv) by the time a worker declares her pregnancy, the declared pregnant worker shall not be assigned to tasks where additional occupational exposure is likely during the remaining gestation period.
[58 FR 65485, Dec. 14, 1993, as amended at 72 FR 31926, June 8, 2007]
#### SULLIVAN v. McCUE CO.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

July 7, 1914.)

Action by- Raymond J. Sullivan, an infant, etc., against the McCue Company.

No opinion. Plaintiff’s exceptions overruled, motion for new trial “denied, with costs, and judgment directed for the defendant upon the nonsuit, with costs.
#### PARK v. EISENBERG et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department.

December 4, 1914.)

Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, First District. Action by William Park against Jacob Eisenberg others. From an order setting aside a verdict in favor of defendants, defendants appeal. Reversed, and verdict reinstated. Myers Goldsmith, of New York City (Emanuel J. ers and Josiah Canter, both of New York City, of counsel), for appellant. Abraham Landau and Jacob I. Berman, both of New York City, for respondents.

PER CURIAM.

This action was brought for goods sold and delivered. The defense was that the goods were sold by sample, and that they did not correspond in kind, color, or quality. The delivery of the goods, the amount, and price agreed upon were conceded, and the only issue was as to whether or not the goods delivered were according to the samples shown. Upon this issue there was a sharp conflict of evidence. Experts were called by both- sides and the case was submitted to the jury in a charge eminently fair to the defendant. The plaintiff asked the court to charge the jury that, “if the goods delivered are as near the sample as human agency can make them, the plaintiff is entitled to a verdict.” This the court refused to charge. The jury, however, found for the plaintiff, which verdict the court below immediately set aside as contrary to the evidence. A careful reading of the record does not bear out this claim. The trial justice stated that the “plaintiff’s own witnesses have testified that these goods were not the same as the sample.” The plaintiff offered the testimony of three witnesses, concededly experts, each of whom had carefully examined the samples and the goods, and each of whom testified, in substance, that the goods delivered were identical in color, made from the same warp and from the same material, and that if there was any difference in finish it was slight, and that the goods delivered were as near the samples as any goods could be made. We can discover no preponderance of testimony in favor of the defendant that leads us to believe that the verdict of the jury was reached by reason of any prejudice or bias. Order reversed, with costs, and verdict reinstated.
#### § 1128.400 Purpose of FMS Article IV.

FMS Article IV of the general terms and conditions specifies requirements related to changes in recipients' budget and program plans. It thereby implements OMB guidance in § 200.308 of 2 CFR part 200 and partially implements § 200.209 and Subpart E of that part.