81190 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 247 / Monday, December 27, 2010 / Proposed Rules 

Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4). For 

the same reason, this action also does 

not significantly or uniquely affect the 

communities of tribal governments, as 

specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 

FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This 

action will not have substantial direct 

effects on the states, on the relationship 

between the national government and 

the states, or on the distribution of 

power and responsibilities among the 

various levels of government, as 

specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 

FR 43255, August 10, 1999), because it 

merely authorizes state requirements as 

part of the State RCRA hazardous waste 

program without altering the 

relationship or the distribution of power 

and responsibilities established by 

RCRA. This action also is not subject to 

Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, 

April 23, 1997), because it is not 

economically significant and it does not 

make decisions based on environmental 

health or safety risks. This rule is not 

subject to Executive Order 13211, 

‘‘Actions Concerning Regulations That 

Significantly Affect Energy Supply, 

Distribution, or Use’’ (66 FR 28355 (May 

22, 2001)) because it is not a significant 

regulatory action under Executive Order 

12866. 

Under RCRA 3006(b), EPA grants a 

state’s application for authorization as 

long as the state meets the criteria 

required by RCRA. It would thus be 

inconsistent with applicable law for 

EPA, when it reviews a state 

authorization application, to require the 

use of any particular voluntary 

consensus standard in place of another 

standard that otherwise satisfies the 

requirements of RCRA. Thus, the 

requirements of section 12(d) of the 

National Technology Transfer and 

Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 

272 note) do not apply. As required by 

section 3 of Executive Order 12988 (61 

FR 4729, February 7, 1996), in issuing 

this rule, EPA has taken the necessary 

steps to eliminate drafting errors and 

ambiguity, minimize potential litigation, 

and provide a clear legal standard for 

affected conduct. EPA has complied 

with Executive Order 12630 (53 FR 

8859, March 15, 1988) by examining the 

takings implications of the rule in 

accordance with the ‘‘Attorney General’s 

Supplemental Guidelines for the 

Evaluation of Risk and Avoidance of 

Unanticipated Takings’’ issued under 

the Executive Order. This rule does not 

impose an information collection 

burden under the provisions of the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 271 

Environmental protection, 

Administrative practice and procedure, 

Confidential business information, 

Hazardous waste, Hazardous waste 

transportation, Indian lands, 

Intergovernmental relations, Penalties, 

Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements. 

Authority: This action is issued under the 

authority of sections 2002(a), 3006, and 

7004(b) of the Solid Waste Disposal Act as 

amended 42 U.S.C. 6912(a), 6926, 6974(b). 

Dated: December 6, 2010. 

Carol Rushin, 

Acting Regional Administrator, Region 8. 

[FR Doc. 2010–32480 Filed 12–23–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS 

COMMISSION 

47 CFR Part 73 

[DA 10–2365; MB Docket No. 02–151; RM– 

10453] 

Television Broadcasting Services; 

Yuma, AZ 

AGENCY: Federal Communications 

Commission. 

ACTION: Dismissal. 

SUMMARY: The Commission dismisses 

the petition for rulemaking filed by 

Arizona Western College, requesting 

that the Commission amend the pretransition DTV Table Allotments to allot 

digital channel 24 at Yuma, Arizona. 

The pre-transition DTV Table of 

Allotments is now obsolete as the DTV 

transition is over and the PostTransition Table of DTV Allotments has 

replaced the pre-transition DTV Table of 

Allotments. Therefore, the petition for 

rulemaking filed by Arizona Western 

College is dismissed. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Adrienne Y. Denysyk, 

adrienne.denysyk@fcc.gov, Media 

Bureau, (202) 418–1600. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a 

synopsis of the Commission’s Order, 

MB Docket No. 02–151, adopted 

December 15, 2010, and released 

December 16, 2010. The full text of this 

document is available for public 

inspection and copying during normal 

business hours in the FCC’s Reference 

Information Center at Portals II, CY– 

A257, 445 12th Street, SW., 

Washington, DC 20554. This document 

will also be available via ECFS (http:// 

www.fcc.gov/cgb/ecfs/). (Documents 

will be available electronically in ASCII, 

Word 97, and/or Adobe Acrobat.) This 

document may be purchased from the 

Commission’s duplicating contractor, 

Best Copy and Printing, Inc., 445 12th 

Street, SW., Room CY–B402, 

Washington, DC 20554, telephone 1– 

800–478–3160 or via e-mail http://www.

BCPIWEB.com. To request this 

document in accessible formats 

(computer diskettes, large print, audio 

recording, and Braille), send an e-mail 

to fcc504@fcc.gov or call the 

Commission’s Consumer and 

Governmental Affairs Bureau at (202) 

418–0530 (voice), (202) 418–0432 

(TTY). This document does not contain 

information collection requirements 

subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act 

of 1995, Public Law 104–13. In addition, 

therefore, it does not contain any 

information collection burden ‘‘for small 

business concerns with fewer than 25 

employees,’’ pursuant to the Small 

Business Paperwork Relief Act of 2002, 

Public Law 107–198, see 44 U.S.C. 

3506(c)(4). Provisions of the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act of 1980 do not apply to 

this proceeding. 

This document is not subject to the 

Congressional Review Act. (The 

Commission, is, therefore, not required 

to submit a copy of this Order to the 

Government Accountability Office, 

pursuant to the Congressional Review 

Act, see 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A) since this 

proposed rule is dismissed, herein.) 

Clay C. Pendarvis, 

Associate Chief, Video Division, Media 

Bureau, Federal Communications 

Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2010–32481 Filed 12–23–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6712–01–P 

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS 

COMMISSION 

47 CFR Part 73 

[DA 10–2358; MB Docket No. 01–323; RM– 

10337] 

Television Broadcasting Services; 

Vernal and Santaquin, UT, and Ely and 

Caliente, NV 

AGENCY: Federal Communications 

Commission. 

ACTION: Dismissal. 

SUMMARY: The Commission dismisses 

the pending rulemaking petition filed by 

TV 6, L.L.C., former permittee of KBCJ, 

analog channel 6, Vernal, Utah, and 

Kaleidescope Foundation Inc., former 

permitee of KBNY, analog channel 6, 

Ely, Nevada, requesting to reallot their 

analog channels from Vernal to 

Santaquin, Utah and from Ely to 

Caliente, Nevada. The Commission was 

required by the DTV Delay Act to 


erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with PROPOSALS-1