alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                       1,856,163
<SECURITIES>                                 8,631,160
<RECEIVABLES>                                   60,859
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,917,022
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,591,972
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          155,873
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                  10,436,099
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,591,972
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               589,397
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               137,083
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                452,314
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            452,314
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   452,314
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
###### Editorial Note on Part 72

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 72 appear at 80 FR 74981, Dec. 1, 2015, and at 81 FR 86910, Dec. 2, 2016.

#### § 72.170 Nonconforming materials, parts, or components.

The licensee, applicant for a license, certificate holder, and applicant for a CoC shall establish measures to control materials, parts, or components that do not conform to their requirements in order to prevent their inadvertent use or installation. These measures must include, as appropriate, procedures for identification, documentation, segregation, disposition, and notification to affected organizations. Nonconforming items must be reviewed and accepted, rejected, repaired, or reworked in accordance with documented procedures.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Thomas C. Lancaster, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously reversed on the law and action remitted to Onondaga County Court for a jury trial. Memorandum: Appellant was 17 years old when indicted for grand larceny, third degree. While represented by counsel, appellant signed a consent to be treated as a youthful offender and after investigation he was determined to be eligible for such treat*728ment. Upon arraignment he was informed that having consented to youthful offender treatment he was entitled to a trial but without a jury. Appellant then pleaded guilty and was sentenced to a reformatory period of imprisonment up to four years. This appeal presents the same issue decided by this court in the case of *People*v. *Sawyer*(33 A D 2d 242). The opinion in *Sawyer*(p. 245) fully sets forth our reasoning and cites the authorities upon which we rely in holding that “ Appellant was effectively denied that right [trial by jury] when he in substance was required to consent to a nonjury trial as a prerequisite to consideration for adjudication as a youthful offender.” This denial of his constitutional right to a jury trial for a serious crime requires a reversal of appellant’s conviction. (Appeal from judgment of Onondaga County Court adjudging defendant a youthful offender.) Present—Goldman, P. J., Witmer, Gabrielli, Moule and Bastow, JJ.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7684

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

FRANK ESQUIVEL,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior

District Judge. (5:05-cr-00026-F-1; 5:08-cv-00281-F)

Submitted: June 17, 2010 Decided: June 23, 2010

Before MOTZ and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Frank Esquivel, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., 

Assistant United States Attorney, Kimberly Ann Moore, OFFICE OF 

THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Frank Esquivel seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2010) 

motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or 

judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. We have independently reviewed the record 

and conclude that Esquivel has not made the requisite showing. 

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss 

the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts 

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
3

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

DISMISSED
H. Res. 639

In the House of Representatives, U.S., 

December 19 (legislative day, December 18), 2005.

Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall 

be in order to consider the conference report to accompany 

the bill (H.R. 2863) making appropriations for the Department of Defense for the fiscal year ending September 30, 

2006, and for other purposes. All points of order against the 

conference report and against its consideration are waived. 

The conference report shall be considered as read. 

Attest:

Clerk.
§ 600.20 Maximum DOE obligation. ( a ) The maximum DOE obligation to the recipient is— ( 1 ) For monetary awards, the amount shown in the award as the amount of DOE funds obligated, and
( 2 ) Any designated property.
( b ) DOE shall not be obligated to make any additional, supplemental, continuation, renewal, or other award for the same or any other purpose.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>                    
<PERIOD-START>                  JUL-01-1996             JUL-01-1995
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1996             DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                    SEP-30-1996             SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                          3,032                   2,116
<SECURITIES>                        0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                   2,990                   2,622
<ALLOWANCES>                        0                       0
<INVENTORY>                       376                     339
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                6,789                   5,559
<PP&E>                         96,024                  94,084
<DEPRECIATION>                (34,489)                (31,329)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                 69,335                  69,406
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           7,018                   8,011
<BONDS>                        50,580                  51,390
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>               0                       0
<PREFERRED>                         0                       0
<COMMON>                            0                       0
<OTHER-SE>                     11,295                   9,752
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>   69,335                  69,406
<SALES>                        11,897                  11,945
<TOTAL-REVENUES>               11,897                  11,945
<CGS>                               0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 (10,358)                (10,352)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                    0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                    0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>             (1,218)                 (1,238)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                   321                     355
<INCOME-TAX>                        0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                 0                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                      0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                     0                       0
<CHANGES>                           0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                      321                     355
<EPS-PRIMARY>                       0<F1>                   0<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                       0                       0
<FN>
<F1> Class A Unitholders........$ .01
     Class B Unitholders........$ .29

<F2> Class A Unitholders........$(.01) 
     Class B Unitholders........$ .32
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                     MAR-31-1997 
<PERIOD-END>                                          DEC-31-1997   
<CASH>                                                     73,696     
<SECURITIES>                                             0     
<RECEIVABLES>                                       72,528
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0     
<INVENTORY>                                        560,965
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   707,189
<PP&E>                                              79,874 
<DEPRECIATION>                                      66,813
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  11,942,559
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,217,542 
<BONDS>                                                  0        
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                            252
<COMMON>                                            36,705
<OTHER-SE>                                       3,340,549
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    11,942,559
<SALES>                                            274,000   
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   274,000
<CGS>                                              160,422
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      160,422
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,046,309
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0        
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  18,880
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (709,592)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0        
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (709,592)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (709,592)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (0.02)
        

</TABLE>
§ 1138.715 Reporting on property under subawards. ( a ) *Requirement.* A DoD Component's general terms and conditions must specify the requirements for reporting on property that recipients must include in their subawards.
( b ) *Award terms and conditions.* To implement the requirement described in paragraph (a) of this section, a DoD Component's general terms and conditions must use the wording appendix G to this part provides as Section D of SUB Article VII.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. William Cadogan, Appellant.

In a *coram nobis*proceeding, defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated June 9, 1969, which, *inter alia,*denied the application without a hearing. Order affirmed. Defendant’s application to vacate his 1956 conviction was based upon a conceded *Bruton*error during his trial. In our opinion the direct proof of defendant’s guilt was so overwhelming that there was no “ reasonable possibility that the evidence *960complained of mig'ht have contributed to the conviction ”; hence, “ the *Bruton*error must be characterized as harmless ” *(People*v. *Baker,*26 N Y 2d 169, 174). Christ, P. ,J., Munder, Martuseello, Latham and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.
# EUR-Lex - 31986D0539 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31986D0539

**86/539/EEC: Commission Decision of 3 November 1986 concerning the implementation by Portugal of certain measures to adjust capacity in the fisheries sector pursuant to Council Directive 83/515/EEC (Only the Portuguese text is authentic) **

*
Official Journal L 319 , 14/11/1986 P. 0074 - 0074 *

*****

COMMISSION DECISION

of 3 November 1986

concerning the implementation by Portugal of certain measures to adjust capacity in the fisheries sector pursuant to Council Directive 83/515/EEC

(Only the Portuguese text is authentic)

(86/539/EEC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community,

Having regard to Council Directive 83/515/EEC of 4 October 1983 concerning certain measures to adjust capacity in the fisheries sector (1), and in particular Article 7 (1) thereof,

Whereas the Portuguese Government intends to introduce an aid scheme in connection with measures involving the temporary or permanent reduction of production capacity in the fisheries sector; whereas, on 19 and 26 August 1986, it communicated particulars of the aid scheme in accordance with Article 6 of Directive 83/515/EEC;

Whereas, in accordance with Article 7 of the said Directive, the Commission has considered whether, having regard to their compatibility with the Directive and to the other structural measures existing or planned in the fisheries sector, the measures contemplated fulfil the conditions for a financial contribution from the Community;

Whereas this Decision is in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee of Fisheries Structures,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The measures which Portugal intends to take to implement an aid scheme in connection with measures involving the temporary or permanent reduction of production capacity in the fisheries sector fulfil the conditions for a financial contribution from the Community.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Portuguese Republic.

Done at Brussels, 3 November 1986.

For the Commission

Antonio CARDOSO E CUNHA

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ No L 290, 22. 10. 1983, p. 15.
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 208 (Tuesday, October 28, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 64177]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-25586]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

[Certification Notice--229]

Notice of Filing of Self-Certification of Coal Capability Under 
the Powerplant and Industrial Fuel Use Act

AGENCY: Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability, DOE.

ACTION: Notice of filing.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On October 1, 2014, Newark Energy Center, LLC, as owner and 
operator of a new base load electric powerplant, submitted a coal 
capability self-certification to the Department of Energy (DOE) 
pursuant to Sec.  201(d) of the Powerplant and Industrial Fuel Use Act 
of 1978 (FUA), as amended, and DOE regulations in 10 CFR 501.60, 61. 
FUA and regulations thereunder require DOE to publish a notice of 
filing of self-certification in the Federal Register. 42 U.S.C. 8311(d) 
and 10 CFR 501.61(c).

ADDRESSES: Copies of coal capability self-certification filings are 
available for public inspection, upon request, in the Office of 
Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability, Mail Code OE-20, Room 8G-
024, Forrestal Building, 1000 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 
20585.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christopher Lawrence at (202) 586-
5260.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Title II of FUA, as amended (42 U.S.C. 8301 
et seq.), provides that no new base load electric powerplant may be 
constructed or operated without the capability to use coal or another 
alternate fuel as a primary energy source. Pursuant to FUA in order to 
meet the requirement of coal capability, the owner or operator of such 
a facility proposing to use natural gas or petroleum as its primary 
energy source shall certify to the Secretary of Energy (Secretary) 
prior to construction, or prior to operation as a base load electric 
powerplant, that such powerplant has the capability to use coal or 
another alternate fuel. Such certification establishes compliance with 
FUA section 201(a) as of the date it is filed with the Secretary. 42 
U.S.C. 8311.
    The following owner of a proposed new base load electric powerplant 
has filed a self-certification of coal-capability with DOE pursuant to 
FUA section 201(d) and in accordance with DOE regulations in 10 CFR 
501.60, 61:
    Owner: Newark Energy Center, LLC.
    Capacity: 705 megawatts (MW).
    Plant Location: Newark, Essex County, New Jersey.
    In-Service Date: December 1, 2014.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on October 22, 2014.
Brian Mills,
Director, Permitting and Siting, Office of Electricity Delivery and 
Energy Reliability.
[FR Doc. 2014-25586 Filed 10-27-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
```
#### § 861.1 Purpose.

The regulations in this part are designed to facilitate the control of traffic at the Nevada Test Site.
#### § 1600.930 Debarring official.

The debarring official for DFC is the Vice President & Chief Administrative Officer, Office of Administration, or designee as delegated in Agency policy.
EXHIBIT 99


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of SITI-Sites.com, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), We,
Lawrence M. Powers, Chief Executive Officer and Toni Ann Tantillo, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify , pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


                                                /s/ Lawrence M. Powers
                                                ----------------------
                                                Lawrence M. Powers
                                                Chief Executive Officer


                                                /s/ Toni Ann Tantillo
                                                ----------------------
                                                Toni Ann Tantillo
                                                Chief Financial Officer


August 13, 2002
#### In re OATES’ WILL. MACKLIN, Appellant, v. OATES et al., Respondents.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

May 29, 1914.)

In the matter of proving the last will and testament of Mary Oates, deceased. Proceeding by John Macklin, as executor, etc., against John T. Oates and others.

No opinion. Decree of the Surrogate’s Court "of Richmond County reversed, and issues ordered to be tried by a jury, with costs of the appeal to abide the event of the new trial, payable out óf the estate. Settle order before the Presiding Justice. See, also, 145 N. Y. Supp. 1131.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1997
<CASH>                                         399,726
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,211,209
<ALLOWANCES>                                   318,439
<INVENTORY>                                  7,605,563
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            14,165,253
<PP&E>                                      42,313,024
<DEPRECIATION>                              15,896,755
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              41,738,424
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       11,596,053
<BONDS>                                     12,604,583
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     8,011,208
<OTHER-SE>                                   7,166,580
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                41,738,424
<SALES>                                     47,499,141
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            47,499,141
<CGS>                                       28,674,116
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               28,674,116
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            12,110,546
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,336,452
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              5,354,296
<INCOME-TAX>                                 2,015,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          3,339,296
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,339,296
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .83
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .83
        

</TABLE>