alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 954 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 954

     To remove the use restrictions on certain land transferred to 
          Rockingham County, Virginia, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 7, 2017

Mr. Goodlatte introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To remove the use restrictions on certain land transferred to 
          Rockingham County, Virginia, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REMOVAL OF USE RESTRICTION.

    Public Law 101-479 (104 Stat. 1158) is amended--
            (1) by striking section 2(d); and
            (2) by adding the following new section at the end:

``SEC. 4. REMOVAL OF USE RESTRICTION.

    ``(a) The approximately 1-acre portion of the land referred to in 
section 3 that is used for purposes of a child care center, as 
authorized by this Act, shall not be subject to the use restriction 
imposed in the deed referred to in section 3.
    ``(b) Upon enactment of this section, the Secretary of the Interior 
shall execute an instrument to carry out subsection (a).''.
                                 <all>
```
PGI 222.101-1 General.       The contracting officer shall obtain approval from the labor advisor before—          (1) Contacting a national office of a labor organization, a Government agency headquarters, or any other organization on labor relations matters or disputes; or          (2) Making recommendations for plant seizure or injunctive action relating to potential or actual work stoppages.    **Parent topic:** PGI 222.101 Labor relations.
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

December 13, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

133988 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

DOROTHY MINTER,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 133988 

 COA: 273017 

Kent CC: 03-005719-NI 

CITY OF GRAND RAPIDS and JOHN 

EDWARD-RHEEM WETZEL, 

Defendants-Appellants. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 12, 2007 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral 

argument during the January 2008 session on whether to grant the application or take 

other peremptory action. MCR 7.302(G)(1). At oral argument, the parties shall address 

whether the Court of Appeals majority correctly applied Kreiner v Fischer, 471 Mich 109 

(2004), in partially reversing the Kent Circuit Court’s order granting the defendants’ 

motion for summary disposition. The parties may file supplemental briefs no later than 

January 4, 2008, but they should not submit mere restatements of their application papers. 

t1213 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

December 13, 2007 

Clerk
Case 2:06-cv-00767-MEF-SRW Document 11 Filed 09/27/2006 Page 1 of 1
§ 75.13 Communication of information to the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). ( a ) Except as otherwise provided in this section, the NRC will furnish to the IAEA all information submitted under §§ 75.10, 75.11, 75.12, and 75.31 through 75.43.
( b ) ( 1 ) An applicant, licensee, certificate holder, or possessor of nuclear material outside facilities may request that information of particular sensitivity, that it customarily holds in confidence, not be transmitted physically to the IAEA. An applicant, licensee, certificate holder, or possessor of nuclear material outside facilities who makes this request shall, at the time the information is submitted, identify the pertinent document or part thereof and make a full statement of the reasons supporting the request.
( 2 ) In considering such a request, it is the policy of the NRC to achieve an effective balance between legitimate concerns of licensees, applicants, certificate holders, or possessors of nuclear material outside facilities, including protection of the competitive position of the owner of the information, and the undertaking of the United States to cooperate with the IAEA to facilitate the implementation of the safeguards provided for in the Safeguards Agreements. The NRC will take into account the obligation of the IAEA to take every precaution to protect commercial and industrial secrets and other confidential information coming to its knowledge in the implementation of the safeguards agreements.
( 3 ) A request made under § 2.390 of this chapter will not be treated as a request under this section unless the application makes specific reference to this section, nor shall a determination to withhold information from public disclosure necessarily require a determination that such information not be transmitted physically to the IAEA.
( 4 ) If a request is granted, the NRC will determine a physical location where the information will remain readily available for examination by the IAEA and will so inform the applicant, licensee, certificate holder, or possessor of nuclear material outside facilities.
( c ) A request made under § 2.390(b) of this chapter will not be treated as a request under this section unless the application makes specific reference to this section, nor shall a determination to withhold information from public disclosure necessarily require a determination that this information not be transmitted physically to the IAEA.
( d ) Where consistent with the Safeguards Agreements, the NRC may at its own initiative, or at the request of a licensee, determine that any information submitted under §§ 75.10, 75.11, and 75.12 shall not be physically transmitted to, or made available for examination by, the IAEA.
[83 FR 19611, May 4, 2018]
EXHIBIT 35.2

SERVICERS CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE

Re: Assessment of compliance for services
provided pursuant to the Master Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated February 27, 2007, the Series Supplement, dated January 8, 2013, the US$ Note Trust Deed, dated January 9, 2013, and other transaction documents relating to SMART ABS
Series 2013-1US Trust (collectively, the Agreements).

The undersigned hereby certifies that:



| | 1. | I, Alan Cameron, am a Director of Macquarie Securities Management Pty Limited (the Manager).
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | A review of the Managers activities during the period from January 23, 2013 (date of issuance of the SMART ABS Series 2013-1US Trust) through March 31,
2013 (the Reporting Period), and of its performance under each of the Agreements has been made under my supervision.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 3. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Manager has fulfilled all of its obligations under each of the Agreements in all material respects throughout the
Reporting Period.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: 20 June 2013



|                     
|---------------------
|/s/ Alan Cameron     
|Alan Cameron
Director

Macquarie Securities Management Pty

Limited
#### § 1108.300 Procurement contract.

*Procurement contract* means a legal instrument which, consistent with 31 U.S.C. 6303, reflects a relationship between the Federal Government and a State, a local government, or other recipient when the principal purpose of the instrument is to acquire property or services for the direct benefit or use of the Federal Government. A procurement contract is a prime-tier transaction and therefore distinct from a recipient's or subrecipient's “procurement transaction” or “contract” as defined in this subpart.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 576 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 576

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                         July 11, 2006.
Whereas Advancement Via Individual Determination (AVID) has provided academic 
        and motivational support that has enabled more than 95 percent of the 
        over 257,000 underperforming students who have been in its program to go 
        on to college;
Whereas Advancement Via Individual Determination has grown over 25 years to more 
        than 2,200 middle and high schools in 36 States and Department of 
        Defense schools in 15 countries;
Whereas Advancement Via Individual Determination started in 1980 with one 
        teacher and 32 high school students in San Diego, California, and 
        developed into an easily replicated program that promotes academic 
        success;
Whereas students are selected because they are low-income, first-generation, 
        college-going students who are underperforming academically;
Whereas college students support the program with individual academic coaching;
Whereas students are required to take a rigorous, college preparatory curriculum 
        including advanced level courses;
Whereas the program provides SAT/ACT preparation, college information and 
        financial aid assistance, college visits, and motivational experiences;
Whereas at the end of the first college year, 89 percent of Advancement Via 
        Individual Determination students are fully eligible and do enroll for 
        their sophomore year compared to a national average of 50 percent; and
Whereas over 98,000 teachers and administrators have attended training in the 
        high-quality teaching skills that support Advancement Via Individual 
        Determination students: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) congratulates Advancement Via Individual Determination students 
        and their teachers on increasing college eligibility and attendance; and
            (2) celebrates Advancement Via Individual Determination's 25 years 
        of success.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
# Subpart 1429.3 - State and Local Taxes

**Parent topic:**PART 1429 - TAXES

## 1429.303 Application of State and local taxes to Government contractors and subcontractors.

Contractors to be treated as agents of the Government for the purposes set forth in FAR 29.303(a) shall require the written review and approval of the AS/PMB. The HCA shall submit requests for approval through SOL, to the Director, PAM, for further action.
§ 835.1 Scope. ( a ) *General.* The rules in this part establish radiation protection standards, limits, and program requirements for protecting individuals from ionizing radiation resulting from the conduct of DOE activities.
( b ) *Exclusion.* Except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, the requirements in this part do not apply to: ( 1 ) Activities that are regulated through a license by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission or a State under an Agreement with the Nuclear Regulatory commission, including activities certified by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission under section 1701 of the Atomic Energy Act;
( 2 ) Activities conducted under the authority of the Deputy Administrator for Naval Reactors, as described in Pub. L. 98-525 and 106-65;
( 3 ) Activities conducted under the Nuclear Explosives and Weapons Surety Program relating to the prevention of accidental or unauthorized nuclear detonations;
( 4 ) DOE activities conducted outside the United States on territory under the jurisdiction of a foreign government to the extent governed by occupational radiation protection requirements agreed to between the United States and the cognizant government;
( 5 ) Background radiation, radiation doses received as a patient for the purposes of medical diagnosis or therapy, or radiation doses received from participation as a subject in medical research programs; or
( 6 ) Radioactive material on or within material, equipment, and real property which is approved for release when the radiological conditions of the material, equipment, and real property have been documented to comply with the criteria for release set forth in a DOE authorized limit which has been approved by a Secretarial Officer in consultation with the Director, Office of Environment, Health, Safety and Security.
( 7 ) Radioactive material transportation not performed by DOE or a DOE contractor.
( c ) Occupational doses received as a result of excluded activities and radioactive material transportation listed in paragraphs (b)(1) through (b)(4) and (b)(7) of this section, shall be included to the extent practicable when determining compliance with the occupational dose limits at §§ 835.202 and 835.207, and with the limits for the embryo/fetus at § 835.206. Occupational doses resulting from authorized emergency exposures and planned special exposures shall not be considered when determining compliance with the dose limits at §§ 835.202 and 835.207.
( d ) The requirements in subparts F and G of this part do not apply to radioactive material transportation by DOE or a DOE contractor conducted: ( 1 ) Under the continuous observation and control of an individual who is knowledgeable of and implements required exposure control measures, or
( 2 ) In accordance with Department of Transportation regulations or DOE orders that govern such movements.
[58 FR 65485, Dec. 14, 1993, as amended at 63 FR 59679, Nov. 4, 1998; 71 FR 68733, Nov. 28, 2006; 72 FR 31922, June 8, 2007; 80 FR 5008, Jan. 30, 2015; 88 FR 41293, June 26, 2023]
Exhibit 32



                       President's Written Certification
                            Of Financial Statements
                       Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Statute 1350



    Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Statute 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 907 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity
as president of Ridgefield Acquisition Corp. (the "Company") that

    (a) the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period Ended
        March 31, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
        the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

    (b) the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all
        material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of
        such period and the results of operations of the Company for such
        period.


Dated: May 15, 2008

                                            /s/ Steven N. Bronson
                                            ----------------------------------
                                            Steven N. Bronson, President
PGI 237.102-77 Acquisition requirements

roadmap tool.

The Acquisition Requirements Roadmap Tool (ARRT) is a tool that enables requiring activities to

develop and organize performance requirements into draft versions of the performance work

statement, the quality assurance surveillance plan, and the performance requirements summary.

ARRT provides a standard template for these documents and some default text that can be modified

to reflect a particular requirement. This tool should be used to prepare these documents for all

performance- based acquisitions for services. ARRT is available for download at

https://www.dau.edu/tools/Documents/SAM/resources/ARRT_Home.html.

Parent topic: PGI 237.102 Policy.
SAT Report

PMN Number: P-13-0069

SAT Date: 11/9/2012

Print Date: 2/4/2013

Related cases:

Health related cases: 

Ecotox related cases: 

Concern levels:

Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments

Level of Concern: 2 3

 Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments

1 11

Exposure Based Review:

Health: No

Ecotox: No

Routes of exposure: Health: Dermal Inhalation 

Ecotox: All releases to water

Fate: ;

Keywords:

 Keywords: IRR-E,S,L,MM, LUNG, UNCERT-SENS, AQUATOX-A,C

Summary of Assessment:

 Fate:

Fate Summary: P-13-0063-77

FATE: Estimations for 

Liquid with MP < 25 C (E)

log Kow = 3.30 (E) 

S = Dispersible / 73.2 mg/L at 25 C (ICB / E)

VP < 1.0E-6 torr at 25 C (E)

BP > 400 C (E)

H < 1.00E-8 (E)

log Koc = 5.66 (E)

log Fish BCF = 1.85 (E)
log Fish BAF = 1.79 (E) 

POTW removal (%) = 90 via sorption

Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg = wk-mo

Sorption to soils/sediments = v.strong

PBT Potential: P1B1

*CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = negl

 Health:

 Health Summary: Absorption is poor through the skin, moderate through 

the GI tract, and good through the lungs based on analogs. The PMN material is expected to be 

a strong irritant to all exposed tissues based on the amines and the surfactant properties of the 

material. There is also concern for lung effects if respirable particles are inhaled based on 

cationic binding to lung tissues and/or interference with the natural surfactant balance in the 

lungs. There is uncertain concern for sensitization for the . Moderate 

concern. 

 Ecotox:

Test Organism Test 

Type

Test End 

Point

Predicted Measured Comments

fish 96-h LC50 0.28

daphnid 48-h LC50 0.050

green algal 96-h EC50 0.018

fish _ chronic value 0.004

daphnid _ chronic 

value

0.006

algal _ chronic 

value

0.008

Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50 _

Sewage Sludge _ Chronic 

Value

_

Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SARs for aliphatic amines and amides; 

SAR chemical class = aliphatic amine, amide; ; liquid; log Kow = 5.67 (EPI); S = 

dispersible in water at 25 C (P); pH7; effective concentrations based on 100% active 

ingredients and mean measured concentrations; hardness < 150.0 mg/L as CaCO3; and TOC 

<2.0 mg/L;

Factors Values Comments

Assessment Factor 10

Concentration of Concern 

(ppb)

1

SARs aliphatic amines and amides

SAR Class aliphatic amine, amide

Ecotox Category Aliphatic Amines
Ecotox Factors Comments: 

 SAT Chair: Becky Jones
Case 2:06-cv-00768-ID-SRW Document 3 Filed 09/05/2006 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 31

SEMT 2013-3

 

EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certification.

 

I, Jeremy P. Strom, certify that:

 

1.I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Sequoia Mortgage Trust 2013-3 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

 

2.Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4.Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and

 

5.All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: CoreLogic Tax Services, LLC (“CoreLogic”), American Security Insurance Company, Standard Guaranty Insurance Company and TrackSure Insurance Agency, Inc. (collectively, “Assurant”), Cenlar, FSB as Servicer, First Republic Bank as Servicer, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as Custodian and Master Servicer, Computershare Trust Company, N.A. as Custodian and Master Servicer, and Citibank, N.A. as Securities Administrator and Paying Agent.

 

Date: March 30, 2022

 

 

/s/ Jeremy. P Strom

Signature 

 

President

(senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
#### § 611.112 Termination of obligations.

DOE, the Federal Financing Bank, and the Borrower shall have such rights to terminate the Agreement as are set forth in the loan documents.