alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 554 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 554

Recognizing the life and legacy of Richard (Dick) Gregory and honoring 
 his contributions to the civil rights movement and to American comedy.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 3, 2017

 Ms. Norton submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
            the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Recognizing the life and legacy of Richard (Dick) Gregory and honoring 
 his contributions to the civil rights movement and to American comedy.

Whereas Dick Gregory was born on October 12, 1932, in St. Louis, Missouri, and 
        passed away on August 19, 2017, in the District of Columbia at the age 
        of 84;
Whereas Dick Gregory was an early civil rights pioneer, participating in sit-ins 
        and getting arrested numerous times throughout the South for the defeat 
        of segregation and for equal rights;
Whereas Dick Gregory was a passionate champion for voting rights and home rule 
        for the residents of the District of Columbia and in the 1960s was in 
        the forefront of the struggle that culminated in home rule for the 
        District of Columbia;
Whereas Dick Gregory moved to Chicago, Illinois, in 1956 to begin his comedy 
        career after having served in the United States Army;
Whereas in 1959, Dick Gregory married Lillian Smith, with whom he had 11 
        children;
Whereas besides civil rights, Dick Gregory was an activist in numerous causes 
        over the course of his life, including the Vietnam War, the Equal Rights 
        Amendment, police brutality, South African apartheid, nuclear power, 
        prison reform, feminism, drug abuse, and Native American rights;
Whereas Dick Gregory authored a dozen books; and
Whereas Dick Gregory became one of the first African-American comedians to enjoy 
        crossover appeal to Blacks and Whites alike, using his talent to point 
        up the absurdity of racism and discrimination: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives honors the life and 
legacy of Richard (Dick) Gregory and acknowledges his contributions to 
civil rights, to multiple other causes for freedom and equality, and to 
American comedy.
                                 <all>
```
Order entered October 4, 2018

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 18 - 00774 - CV IN RE RUTH TORRES, Relator O rigina l Proceeding from the 44th Judicial District Court

Dall as County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC - 16 - 08711



### O RDER Before Justices Lang

- Miers, Fillmore, and Stoddart Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DENY relator’s petition for writ of mandamus, petition for writ of prohibition, and petition for wri t of injunction.
/s/ ELIZABETH LANG

- MIERS JUSTICE
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          98,088
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             510
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  1,138,914
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                      1,886,668
<ALLOWANCE>                                     36,245
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,812,806
<DEPOSITS>                                   2,159,776
<SHORT-TERM>                                   386,892
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            608,988
<LONG-TERM>                                    324,386
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        26,301
<OTHER-SE>                                     306,463
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               3,812,806
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 44,977
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               17,805
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 2,264
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                65,046
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              27,132
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              40,155
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           24,891
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    6,388
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 28,216
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (24,757)
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                    (24,757)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (12,203)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.46)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.46)
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.07
<LOANS-NON>                                     14,733
<LOANS-PAST>                                    16,787
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                33,834
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    4,632
<RECOVERIES>                                       655
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               36,245
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            36,245
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
#### § 780.44 Hearing and decision.

In accordance with section 153d of the Act, the Board shall hold a hearing and issue a final decision on the application.
APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

2007-1865.

#### State v. Aleshire.

Licking App. No. 2007-CA-l, 2007-Ohio-4446. Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law No. II; cause held for the decision in 2006-1973, *State v. Sarkozy,*Cuyahoga App. No. 86952, 2006-Ohio-3977; and briefing schedule stayed.

*1506Moyer, C. J., would also accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. I.

Lundberg Stratton and O’Connor, JJ., would also accept the appeal on Proposition of Law Nos. I, III, IV, and V.

Pfeifer, O’Donnell, and Cupp, JJ., dissent.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v George Wright, Appellant.

Judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered January 3, 1979, affirmed. No opinion. This case is remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (subd 5). Hopkins, J. P., Damiani, Lazer and Cohalan, JJ., concur.
#### § 1201.80 Program income.

Notwithstanding 2 CFR 200.1, *program income* means gross income earned by the non-Federal entity that is directly generated by a supported activity or earned as a result of the Federal award during the period of performance. (See 2 CFR 200.1 *Definitions*.) Program income includes but is not limited to income from fees for services performed, the use or rental or real or personal property acquired under Federal awards, the sale of commodities or items fabricated under a Federal award, license fees and royalties on patents and copyrights, and principal and interest on loans made with Federal award funds. Interest earned on advances of Federal funds is not program income. Except as otherwise provided in Federal statutes, regulations, or the terms and conditions of the Federal award, program income does not include rebates, credits, discounts, taxes, special assessments, levies, and fines raised by a grantee and subgrantee, and interest earned on any of them.

[79 FR 76049, Dec. 19, 2014, as amended at 88 FR 12806, Mar. 1, 2023]
July 27, 2015

Mr. Francisco Jeremias

P.O. Box 567

San Lorenzo, PR 00754

Dear Mr. Jeremias:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from 

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can not process your 

request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can Not Process Your Request

We entered your June 30, exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA-2015-2598), 

but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does not 

comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any 

further, you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the 

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption 

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you 

seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your 

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.
2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brenda Robeson

Program Analyst, Airmen and 

 Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
#### BOVANZIER, Respondent, v. BABCOCK, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

November 11, 1914.)

Action by Paul Bovanzier against Rufus A. Babcock.

PER CURIAM.

Order reversed, with $10 costs disbursements, and motion denied, with $10 costs. *Held*that, the complaint not being subdivided into separately numbered) paragraphs, the denials of the answer are to be deemed to apply to all the material allegations of the complaint, and, even if considered as denials of knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief, are sufficient to raise an issue as to the allegations of transfer to and ownership by plaintiff. See Rochkind v. Perlman, 123 App. Div. 808, 108 N. Y. Supp. 224, 1151; Curran v. Art, 141 App. Div. 659, 125 N. Y. Supp. 993.
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Corporate Trust Services**MAC R1204-0109062 Old Annapolis RoadColumbia, MD 21045Tel: 410 884 2000 Fax: 410 715 2380 |
|--------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp. 383 Madison Avenue31st FloorNew York, New York 10179  RE: Annual Statement of Compliance for JP Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Trust 2013-C10, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2013-C10  Per the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of March 1, 2013 (the "Agreement"), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Certificate Administrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2015 (the "Reporting Period"): (a) A review of Wells Fargo's activities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under such officer's supervision; and (b) To the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.  March 1, 2016  /s/ Brian SmithBRIAN SMITHVice President   Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
##### 



Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION OF TREASURER PURSUANT TO SECURITIES ACT
RULES 13A-14 AND 15D-14 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report (report) on Form 10-Q of Del Taco Income Properties
IV;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls over financial
reporting.
 Date: November 14, 2007
    
    /s/ Steven L. BrakeSteven L. BrakeTreasurer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          38,736
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  118,119
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               156,855
<PP&E>                                       5,132,052
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,315,455
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,095,372
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           90,169
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,095,372
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               516,730
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               461,300
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             253,199
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (197,769)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
§ 820.37 Participation in an adjudication. ( a ) *Parties.* In an enforcement adjudication, the Director and the respondent shall be the only parties; provided that the Presiding Officer may permit a person to intervene as a party if the person demonstrates it could be liable in the event a civil penalty is assessed.
( b ) *Appearances.* Any party to an enforcement adjudication may appear in person or by counsel or other representative. A partner may appear on behalf of a partnership and an officer may appear on behalf of a corporation. Persons who appear as counsel or other representative must conform to the standards of conduct and ethics required of practitioners before the courts of the United States.
( c ) *Amicus Curiae.* Persons not parties to an enforcement adjudication who wish to file briefs may so move. The motion shall identify the interest of the person and shall state the reasons why the proposed amicus brief is desirable. If the motion is granted, the Presiding Officer shall issue an order setting the time for filing such brief. An *amicus curiae* is eligible to participate in any briefing after his motion is granted, and shall be served with all briefs, reply briefs, motions, and orders relating to issues to be briefed.
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**
MEMORANDUM OPINION
N o. 04

- 24

- 00412

- CR Christopher ACOSTA , Appellant

v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee From the 187th Judicial District Court , Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2024CR1657 Honorable Stephanie R. Boyd , Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice Irene Rios , Justice Delivered and Filed: September 4, 2024
DIS MISSED The trial court’s certification in this appeal states that this criminal case, “is a plea

- bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal,” and “the defendant has waived the right of appeal.” Rule 25.2(a)(2) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provides: In a plea bargain case

— that is, a case in which a defendant’s plea was guilty or nolo contendere and the punishment did not exceed the punishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant

— a defendant may appeal only: (A) those matters that were raised by written motion filed and ruled on before trial,04

- 24

- 00412

- CR

- 2

- (B) after getting the trial court’s permission to appeal, or (C) where the specific appeal is expressly authorized by statute.
T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 25.2(a)(2). The clerk’s record, which contains a written plea bargain , establishes the punishment assessed by the court does not exceed the punishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant. See id. The clerk’s record does not include a written motion filed and ruled upon before trial, nor does it indicate the trial court gave its permission to appeal

. See id. Appellant has not identified with this court any statute that expressly authorizes the specific appeal. See id. The t rial court’s certification , therefore, appears to accurately reflect that this is a plea

- bargain case and appellant does not have a right to appeal

. We must dismiss an appeal “if a certification that shows the defendant has the right of appeal has not been made part of the record.” T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 25.2(d). We issued an order stating this appeal would be dismissed unless an amended trial court certification was made part of the appellate record. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 25.2(d); Dears v. State , 154 S.W.3d 610 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005); Daniels v. State ,110 S.W.3d 174 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 2003, no pet.). Appellant responded to our order, stating that the trial court denied his request to amend the certification to allow him to appeal. Because no amended trial court certification has been filed, we dismiss this appeal pursuant to Rule 25.2(d).
PER CURIAM
DO NOT PUBLISH
#### § 905.37 Process.

Modified contractual language shall be required to place resource extensions under contract. Resource extensions and allocations to new customers from the initial resource pool will take effect when existing contracts expire. These dates are December 31, 2000, for the Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program—Eastern Division and September 30, 2004, for the Loveland Area Projects. For the Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program—Eastern Division, Western will offer contracts to existing customers for resource extensions no sooner than the effective date of the final regulations. For the Loveland Area Projects, existing contracts provide for potential adjustments to marketable resources in 1999. No contracts will be offered to existing customers for post-2004 Loveland Area Projects resources until the analysis of potential resource adjustments in 1999 has been completed and any adjustments are implemented. Existing power sales contracts require that this analysis be completed by 1996.
###### Editorial Note on Part 72

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 72 appear at 80 FR 74981, Dec. 1, 2015, and at 81 FR 86910, Dec. 2, 2016.

#### § 72.160 Licensee and certificate holder inspection.

The licensee, applicant for a license, certificate holder, and applicant for a CoC shall establish and execute a program for inspection of activities affecting quality by or for the organization performing the activity to verify conformance with the documented instructions, procedures, and drawings for accomplishing the activity. The inspection must be performed by individuals other than those who performed the activity being inspected. Examinations, measurements, or tests of material or products processed must be performed for each work operation where necessary to assure quality. If direct inspection of processed material or products cannot be carried out, indirect control by monitoring processing methods, equipment, and personnel must be provided. Both inspection and process monitoring must be provided when quality control is inadequate without both. If mandatory inspection hold points that require witnessing or inspecting by the licensee's or certificate holder's designated representative, and beyond which work should not proceed without the consent of its designated representative, are required, the specific hold points must be indicated in appropriate documents.
#### § 1108.365 Supplies.

*Supplies* means all tangible personal property, including computing devices, acquired under an award that does not meet the definition of equipment in this subpart.