alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|EXHIBIT 32
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Quarterly Report of SITI-Sites.com, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q
for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), We, Lawrence M. Powers, Chief Executive Officer and Toni Ann
Tantillo, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 Act of 2002, that:
(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; and
(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and result of operations of the Company.
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|
|
|

| |  | /s/   Lawrence M. Powers                        
| |  | ------------------------------------------------
| |  |                                      
| |  | Lawrence M. Powers
      Chief Executive Officer
| |  |                                                 
| |  |                                                 
| |  | /s/   Toni Ann Tantillo                         
| |  |                                      
| |  | Toni Ann Tantillo
      Chief Financial Officer 

|                 
|-----------------
|                 
|February 14, 2005

|16
|--
Exhibit 10.22


 





COLONIAL DOWNS


10515 Colonial Downs
Parkway   New Kent, Virginia 23124


(804) 966-7223   Fax (804) 966-1565


www.colonialdowns.com


 


May 26, 2006


 


Dr. R. C. Dunavant, Jr., D.V.M.


President


Virginia Harness Horse Association


c/o Lunenburg Animal Hospital


Highway 40


Kenbridge, VA 23944


 


Dear Charley,


 


The agreement between Colonial Downs (“Colonial”) and the Virginia
Harness Horse Association (the “VHHA”) dated January 1, 2006 (the
“Agreement”) sets forth in Section 9C requirements for additional
referenda in the Central-Southside Virginia Region. Colonial and the VHHA both
agree that additional referenda in the Central-Southside Virginia Region for
the purpose of opening additional satellite wagering facilities in this region
is not the optimal use of their collective resources at this time. The VHHA
further acknowledges that by running six referendums in 2003 and 2004, Colonial
met prior contractual requirements to run three referendums in the Central
Southside Virginia Region and actually ran two referendums that it was not
required to in areas outside the Central Southside Virginia Region.


 


Colonial and the VHHA both believe the greatest potential for handle
growth lies in account wagering and that account wagering is the best way to
penetrate the Northern Virginia market. Colonial has developed a business plan
to expand account wagering to internet cafes, country clubs and bars and
restaurants with sports themes. Colonial is also developing the touch screen
technology to facilitate this expansion. Therefore, in recognition of a mutual
shift in emphasis to account wagering as a means to handle and purse account
growth, Colonial and the VHHA agree to replace the first sentence of
Section 8E of the Agreement with the following:


 


“Colonial Downs shall conduct three referenda during the period from
January 1, 2005 to December 31, 2007 in the Central-Southside
Virginia Region as set forth in Exhibit D hereto (the “Central Southside
Virginia region”); provided however, upon standardbred handle (as calculated as
provided in Subsection C(3)) equaling or exceeding $45,000,000, Colonial
Downs’ obligations to conduct additional referenda in the Central-Southside
Virginia Region shall automatically terminate.”


 


Making Virginia Horse Racing
History


 


Sincerely,


 


	
  /s/ Ian M. Stewart

  
	
  Ian M. Stewart, President

  



 


 


Acknowledged and accepted


 


Virginia Harness Horse Association


 


	
  By:

  	
  /s/ R. C. Dunavant

  
	
  Name

  	
  Dr. R. C. Dunavant, Jr., D.V.M.

  
	
  Title

  	
  President
No. 98-41505 -1-

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-41505 Conference Calendar

SCOTTY LYNN TAYLOR, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus MONTY TIPPS, Corporal at Sulphur Springs Police Department; STILLWAGONER, Detective; RONNIE GLOSSUP, Magistrate Judge of the Peace; MARTIN BRADDY, Assistant District Attorney, Defendants-Appellees.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:98-CV-60

-------------------- February 17, 2000 Before EMILIO M. GARZA, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: * Scotty Lynn Taylor, Texas prisoner #817710, appeals the dismissal of his civil rights lawsuit as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). As the district court explained, Taylor’s claims that he was denied due process and equal protection by the defendants are barred by Heck v. Humphrey , 512 U.S. 477, 487 (1994), which held that a state prisoner’s lawsuit is barred whenever a judgment in the prisoner’s favor “wouldNo. 98-41505 -2- necessarily imply the invalidity of his conviction.” Taylor argues that the district court erred in dismissing his complaint with prejudice. In Boyd v. Biggers , 31 F.3d 279, 284 (5th Cir. 1994), however, we squarely held that it was not error to dismiss a complaint pursuant to Heck with prejudice. The district court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing Taylor’s complaint with prejudice. See Siglar v. Hightower , 112 F.3d 191, 193 (5th Cir. 1997). This appeal is without arguable merit and, thus, frivolous. Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983). Because the appeal is frivolous, it is DISMISSED. 5th Cir. R. 42.2. We caution Taylor that both the district court’s and this court’s dismissals will count as “strikes” for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Adepegba v. Hammons , 103 F.3d 383, 388 (5th Cir. 1996). Once Taylor accumulates three strikes, he may not proceed in forma pauperis in any civil action or appeal filed while he is incarcerated or detained in any facility unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTIONS WARNING ISSUED.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7128

DWAYNE JOHNSON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

J. E. SAUNDERS, Correctional Officer,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge.

(CA-96-572-R)

Submitted: September 20, 1996 Decided: October 2, 1996

Before NIEMEYER, HAMILTON, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dwayne Johnson, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing

his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint for failure to state a claim

upon which relief may be granted. We have reviewed the record and

the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Johnson v.

Saunders, No. CA-96-572-R (W.D. Va. July 15, 1996). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management

          - [LLES956000-L14200000-BJ0000-LXSITRST0000]

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice of Filing of Plat of Survey; Alabama.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) will file the plat of survey of the lands described below in the BLM-Eastern States office in Springfield, Virginia, 30 calendar days from the date of publication in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Bureau of Land Management-Eastern States, 7450 Boston Boulevard, Springfield, Virginia 22153. Attn: Cadastral Survey.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The survey was requested by the Bureau of Indian Affairs.

The lands surveyed are:

## St. Stephens Meridian, Alabama

T. 17 N., R. 19 E.

The plat of survey represents the dependent resurvey of Parcel No. 17, land held in trust for the Poarch Band of the Creek Indians, in Township 17 North, Range 19 East, of the St. Stephens Meridian, in the State of Alabama, and was accepted September 28, 2010.

We will place a copy of the plat we described in the open files. It will be available to the public as a matter of information.

If BLM receives a protest against the survey, as shown on the plat, prior to the date of the official filing, we will stay the filing pending our consideration of the protest.

We will not officially file the plat until the day after we have accepted or dismissed all protests and they have become final, including decisions on appeals.

 Dated: December 14, 2010.

Dominica Van Koten,

Chief Cadastral Surveyor.

[FR Doc. 2010-31984 Filed 12-20-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-GJ-P
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Olin Hill, Jr., and Maurice Kessler, Appellants.

Upon appeal by defendants (by permission) the Court of Appeals modified the two judgments herein of the County Court, Westchester County, one rendered as to defendant Kessler on December 20, 1966 and the other rendered as to defendant Hill on December 21, 1966, convicting them of attempted burglary in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, the modification consisting of a direction that a hearing be held on the issue of the in-court identification of defendants *(People*v. *Hill,*22 N Y 2d 686, modfg. 28 A D 2d 959). Such hearing has been held and the County Court has made an order thereon, dated August 20, 1968, adjudging said issue against defendants. Order of August 20, 1968 modified, on the law and the facts, so as to limit the adjudication therein to defendant Kessler and to adjudge that the in-court identification of defendant Hill by the witness Miss Milligan is suppressed. As so modified, order affirmed. In accordance, the judgment convicting defendant Hill is reversed, on the law and the *967facts, and a new trial as to him is ordered. It is our opinion that the People failed to prove by clear and convincing evidence, at the hearing directed by the Court of Appeals, that the in-court identification of defendant Hill by Miss Milligan was not tainted by the improper show-up. Accordingly, defendant Hill should be afforded a new trial, at which the identification testimony of that witness should be excluded *(People*v. *Ballott,*20 N Y 2d 600; *People*v. *Hill, supra).*Unlike the situation as to defendant Hill, it is our opinion that the People established by clear and convincing evidence that the witnesses’ in-court identification of defendant Kessler was not tainted by the improper show-up. Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, Rabin, Benjamin and Martuscello, JJ„ concur.
Exhibit 35.1

                                                          [LOGO] IndymacBank(SM)


                       REG AB 1123 Statement of Compliance

I am an authorized officer for IndyMac Bank, F.S.B, the servicer for the
transaction listed below and I certify:

a)    A review of IndyMac Bank's activities during the reporting period and of
      its performance under the applicable servicing agreement has been made
      under my supervision.

b)    To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, except as set forth
      below IndyMac Bank has fulfilled all of its obligations under the
      agreement in all material respects throughout the reporting period.

c)    None


                                By: /s/ Robert M. Abramian
                                    ----------------------
                                    Robert M. Abramian
                                    First Vice President
                                    Home Loan Servicing
                                    Investor Reporting
                                    Indymac Bank


                                By: /s/ Barbara Perez
                                    ----------------------
                                    Barbara Perez
                                    Senior Vice President
                                    Indymac Bank



Prepared for:   Deutsche Bank

Date:           February 28, 2007

Ref:            6012 - INDX 2006-FLX1 (DB)



                                                             www.indymacbank.com


             460 Sierra Madre Villa Ave., Pasadena, CA 91107   Tel: 626.535.5555
§ 71.3 Requirement for license. Except as authorized in a general license or a specific license issued by the Commission, or as exempted in this part, no licensee may— ( a ) Deliver licensed material to a carrier for transport; or
( b ) Transport licensed material.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

# AGENCY:

Office of Nonproliferation and International Security, Department of Energy.

# ACTION:

Proposed subsequent arrangement.

# SUMMARY: 

Pursuant to Article VIII.C of the Agreement for Cooperation Concerning Civil Uses of Atomic Energy, signed April 4, 1972, as amended, the American Institute in Taiwan and the Taipei Economic and Cultural Representative Office (TECRO) hereby jointly determine that the provisions in Article XI of the Agreement may be effectively applied with respect of the plan proposed by TECRO in March 2010 for the alteration in form or content of U.S.-origin nuclear material contained in irradiated fuel elements at the hot laboratory of the Institute of Nuclear Energy Research, Lungtan, Taiwan. The facility is hereby found acceptable to both parties pursuant to Article VIII.C of the Agreement for the sole purpose of alteration in form or content of irradiated fuel elements for the period ending December 31, 2015.

In accordance with section 131a. of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, it has been determined that this subsequent arrangement will not be inimical to the common defense and security.

This subsequent arrangement will take effect no sooner than January 12, 2011.

Dated: December 21, 2010.

For the Department of Energy.

Thomas P. D'Agostino,

Administrator, National Nuclear Security Administration.

[FR Doc. 2010-32586 Filed 12-27-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<CASH>                                           4,075
<SECURITIES>                                 2,714,812
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,475,685
<ALLOWANCES>                                    64,000
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,765,157
<PP&E>                                          12,760
<DEPRECIATION>                                  12,760
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,204,622
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          247,145
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,957,477
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,204,622
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               202,873
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  286,414
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (83,541)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (83,541)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (83,541)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (2.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.02)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           2,216
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      811
<ALLOWANCES>                                        88
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                          34,219
<DEPRECIATION>                                  26,021
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  11,520
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      10,353
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    11,520
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,633
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,281
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   (3)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    222
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                222
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       222
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.02
        

</TABLE>
# EUR-Lex - 31988D0442 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31988D0442

**88/442/EEC: Commission Decision of 27 June 1988 amending Decision 86/414/EEC as regards the list of establishments in Argentina approved for the purpose of importing meat products into the Community **

*
Official Journal L 218 , 09/08/1988 P. 0026 - 0027 *

*****

COMMISSION DECISION

of 27 June 1988

amending Decision 86/414/EEC as regards the list of establishments in Argentina approved for the purpose of importing meat products into the Community

(88/442/EEC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community,

Having regard to Council Directive 77/99/EEC of 21 December 1976 on health problems affecting intra-Community trade in meat products (1), as last amended by Regulation (EEC) No 3768/85 (2), and in particular Article 17 (1) thereof,

Whereas a list of establishments in Argentina, approved for the purpose of importing meat products into the Community, was drawn up initially by Commission Decision 86/414/EEC (3), amended by Decision 88/268/EEC (4);

Whereas a Community on-the-spot visit to meat production establishments in Argentina has revealed that the level of hygiene in one establishment was altered since the last inspection; whereas the list of establishments should be amended accordingly;

Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Veterinary Committee,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The Annex to Decision 86/414/EEC is hereby replaced by the Annex to this Decision.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 27 June 1988.

For the Commission

Frans ANDRIESSEN

Vice-President

(1) OJ No L 26, 31. 1. 1977, p. 85.

(2) OJ No L 362, 31. 12. 1985, p. 8.

(3) OJ No L 237, 23. 8. 1986, p. 36.

(4) OJ No L 107, 28. 4. 1988, p. 52.

ANNEX

LIST OF ESTABLISHMENTS

1.2.3 // // // // Approval No // Establishment // Address // // // // 13 // Swift Armour SA Argentina // Rosario, Santa Fe // 16 // Santa Elena // Santa Elena, Entre Ríos // 89 // Carcarana // Carcarana, Santa Fe // 249 // Frigorífico Nelson // Nelson, Santa Fe // 1352 // Frigorífico Meatex SA // Alejandro Korn, Buenos Aires // 1373 // El Centenario // Venado Tuerto, Santa Fe // 1383 // Barreca Hnos // Vivorata, Buenos Aires // 1399 // FRIA // Casilda, Santa Fe // 1822 // Meatex // Villa Ballester, Buenos Aires // 1921 // San Telmo SACIAFIF // Mar del Plata, Buenos Aires // 1930 // Vizental y Cía. SACIA // San José, Entre Ríos // 1964 // Casasa SA // Dolores, Buenos Aires // 2067 // Cía. elaboradora de productos animales SAICAGT // Pontevedra, Buenos Aires // // //