alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 569 

Honoring and praising the work of the United States-China Economic and 

Security Review Commission and restating Congress’ commitment to 

the Commission. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 17, 2005 

Mr. RYAN of Ohio (for himself and Mr. HUNTER) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

RESOLUTION 

Honoring and praising the work of the United States-China 

Economic and Security Review Commission and restating 

Congress’ commitment to the Commission. 

Whereas the Commission was created to review the national 

security implications of trade and economic ties between 

the United States and the People’s Republic of China; 

Whereas Congress created the Commission to review the national security implications of trade and economic ties between the United States and the People’s Republic of 

China; 

Whereas Congress created the Commission to monitor, investigate, and to provide recommendations, where appropriate, to Congress for legislative and administrative action; 
2 

•HRES 569 IH 

Whereas the Commission focuses its work on the essential 

topics of proliferation practices, economic reforms and 

United States economic transfers, energy, United States 

capital markets, corporate reporting, regional economic 

and security impacts, United States-China bilateral programs, WTO compliance, and media control by the Chinese government; and 

Whereas the Commission is composed of 12 bipartisan members who serve two-year terms: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that— 

3 (1) the United States-China Economic and Se4 curity Review Commission is to be commended for 

5 its bipartisan work and its analyses of trends in the 

6 United States-China relationship that have serious 

7 implications for the long-term economic and security 

8 interests of the United States; and 

9 (2) the Commission and its work should con10 tinue to receive the support of Congress. 

Æ
### In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

______________________________

No. 06

- 0 9

- 00 010

- CR

______________________________

DARNELL HARTSFIELD , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Fourth Judicial District Court

Rusk County, Texas

Trial Court No. CR05

- 337

Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Mo rriss2 MEMORANDUM OPINION

A jury convicted Darnell Hartsfield of five counts of capital murder ; he was sentenced to

punishment at life imprisonment. Hartsfield appeals from his conviction and has filed a single

brief, in which he raises issues common to all of his appeals. 1 He argues that the trial court

committed reversible error in that (1) the evidence supporting his conviction was legally and

factually insufficient and (2) admitting evidence of an extraneous offense.

We addressed these issues in detail in our opinion of this date i n Hartsfield’s appeal in

cause number 06

- 09

- 00006

- C R. For the reasons stated therein, we likewise conclude that error

has not been shown in this case.

We affirm the trial court’s judgment.

Josh R. Morriss, III

Chief Justice

Date Submitted: October 21, 2009

Date Decided: Febru ary 4 , 2010

Do Not Publish

1 Defendant appeals from five convictions, for capital murder , cause numbers 06

- 09

- 0 0006

- CR through

06

- 09

- 00010

- CR.
#### MANNING, Respondent, v. STATEN ISLAND MIDLAND RY. CO., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

June 19, 1914.)

Action by Annie Manning against the Staten Island Midland Railway Company.

No opinion. Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs.
# L_2023240EN.01008701.xml

| 28.9.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 240/87 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.9.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 240/87

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE No 217/2020

of 11 December 2020

amending Annex XI (Electronic communication, audiovisual services and information society) to the EEA Agreement [2023/2019]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (“the EEA Agreement”), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/1250 (1), which is incorporated into the EEA Agreement, was declared invalid by the Court of Justice of the European Union in its judgement of 16 July 2020 in Case C-311/18 (2) and consequently the reference to Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/1250 is to be deleted from the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/1250 (1), which is incorporated into the EEA Agreement, was declared invalid by the Court of Justice of the European Union in its judgement of 16 July 2020 in Case C-311/18 (2) and consequently the reference to Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/1250 is to be deleted from the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex XI to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex XI to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The text of point 5eq (Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/1250) of Annex XI to the EEA Agreement is deleted.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on 12 December 2020, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 3

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 11 December 2020.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Sabine MONAUNI

---

(1)  
  OJ L 207, 1.8.2016, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 249, 16.7.2018, p. 15.

2

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
-80 -79 -78 -77 -76 -75

 38

 39

 40

 41

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

05/26

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 26 May 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 39.31 N 76.47 W Meters AGL
Exhibit 32.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                               ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Certification of CEO

In connection with the Quarterly Report of the United States  Basketball  League
(the  "Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period  ended  August 31, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, Daniel T. Meisenheimer III, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,
pursuant to Section 18 U.S.C.  1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


   /s/ Daniel T. Meisenheimer III                              October 17, 2003
   -------------------
     Daniel T. Meisenheimer III
     Chief Executive Officer


     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
     other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
     signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
     written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company
     and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
     Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


     This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section
     906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent
     required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
     Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended  (the
     "Exchange Act").  Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated
     by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended,
     or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically
     incorporates it by reference
Exhibit 33.3b

 

|        |                                                                                        |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                   |
|        | 260 Interstate North Circle, SE

Atlanta, GA 30339 

T 770.763-4000 

www.assurant.com |

 

February 13, 2020

REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH §1122 (d)(2)(vi), §1122(d)(4)(xi) and §1122(d)(4)(xii) of REGULATION AB SERVICING CRITERIA FOR THE REPORTING PERIOD JANUARY 1, 2019 TO DECEMBER 31, 2019

American Security Insurance Company, Standard Guaranty Insurance Company and TrackSure Insurance Agency, Inc. (collectively, the “Asserting Party”) is responsible for assessing compliance for the period of January 1, 2019 through December 31, 2019 (the “Reporting Period”) with the servicing criteria set forth in §1122(d)(2)(vi), §1122(d)(4)(xi) and §1122(d)(4)(xii) of Title 17, §229.1122(d) of the Code of Federal Regulations, (the “Applicable Servicing Criteria”) which the Asserting Party has concluded are applicable to the insurance escrow servicing activities it performs with respect to all mortgage backed securities transactions that were registered after January 1, 2006 with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Platform Transactions”). The Asserting Party used the criteria set forth in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB to assess the compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.

The Asserting Party has assessed its compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria for the Reporting Period and has concluded that the Asserting Party has complied, in all material respects, with the Applicable Servicing Criteria for the Reporting Period with respect to the Platform Transaction.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on the assessment of compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of and for the Reporting Period.

American Security Insurance Company Standard Guaranty Insurance Company TrackSure Insurance Agency, Inc.

|                                                        |
|--------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                   |
| /s/ Michael Campbell                                   |
| By: Michael Campbell                                   |
| President of American Security Insurance Company       |
| And Standard Guaranty Insurance Company, and           |
| Sr. Vice President of TrackSure Insurance Agency, Inc. |

 

 

Date:  February 13, 2020
#### § 830.7 Graded approach.

Where appropriate, a contractor must use a graded approach to implement the requirements of this part, document the basis of the graded approach used, and submit that documentation to DOE. The graded approach may not be used in implementing the unreviewed safety question (USQ) process or in implementing technical safety requirements.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                       2,563,358
<SECURITIES>                                 7,734,371
<RECEIVABLES>                                   57,925
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,621,283
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,393,482
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          138,623
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                  10,254,859
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,393,482
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               400,339
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                98,416
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                301,923
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            301,923
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   301,923
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
| **Page 1** |
|------------|

----

| **Page 2** |
|------------|

----

| **Page 3** |
|------------|

----

| **Page 4** |
|------------|

----

| **Page 5** |
|------------|

----

| **Page 6** |
|------------|

----

| **Page 7** |
|------------|

----

| **Page 8** |
|------------|

----

| **Page 9** |
|------------|

----

| **Page 10** |
|-------------|

----

| **Page 11** |
|-------------|

----

| **Page 12** |
|-------------|

----

| **Page 13** |
|-------------|

----

| **Page 14** |
|-------------|

----

| **Page 15** |
|-------------|

----

| **Page 16** |
|-------------|

----

| **Page 17** |
|-------------|

----

| **Page 18** |
|-------------|

----

| **Page 19** |
|-------------|

----

| **Page 20** |
|-------------|

----

| **Page 21** |
|-------------|

----

| **Page 22** |
|-------------|

----

| **Page 23** |
|-------------|

----

| **Page 24** |
|-------------|

----

| **Page 25** |
|-------------|

----

| **Page 26** |
|-------------|

----

| **Page 27** |
|-------------|

----

| **Page 28** |
|-------------|

----

| **Page 29** |
|-------------|

----

| **Page 30** |
|-------------|

----

| **Page 31** |
|-------------|

----

| **Page 32** |
|-------------|

----

| **Page 33** |
|-------------|

----

| **Page 34** |
|-------------|

----

| **Page 35** |
|-------------|

----

| **Page 36** |
|-------------|

----

| **Page 37** |
|-------------|

----

| **Page 38** |
|-------------|

----

| **Page 39** |
|-------------|

----

| **Page 40** |
|-------------|
#### § 76.85 Assessment of accidents.

The Corporation shall perform an analysis of potential accidents and consequences to establish the basis for limiting conditions for operation of the plant with respect to the potential for releases of radioactive material. Special attention must be directed to assurance that plant operation will be conducted in a manner to prevent or to mitigate the consequences from a reasonable spectrum of postulated accidents which include internal and external events and natural phenomena in order to ensure adequate protection of the public health and safety. Plant operating history relevant to the assessment should be included. In performing this assessment, the full range of operations should be considered including, but not necessarily limited to, operation at the maximum capacity contemplated. The assessment must be performed using an expected release rate resulting from anticipated operational occurrences and accidents with existing systems and procedures intended to mitigate the release consequences, along with site characteristics, including meteorology, to evaluate the offsite radiological consequences.
Editorial Note on Part 72
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 72 appear at 80 FR 74981, Dec. 1, 2015, and at 81 FR 86910, Dec. 2, 2016.

§ 72.200 Provision of MRS information. ( a ) The Director, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards, or the Director's designee shall provide to the Governor and legislature of any State in which an MRS authorized under the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982, as amended, is or may be located, to the Governors of any contiguous States, to each affected unit of local government and to the governing body of any affected Indian Tribe, timely and complete information regarding determinations or plans made by the Commission with respect to siting, development, design, licensing, construction, operation, regulation or decommissioning of such monitored retrievable storage facility.
( b ) Notwithstanding paragraph (a) of this section, the Director or the Director's designee is not required to distribute any document to any entity if, with respect to such document, that entity or its counsel is included on a service list prepared pursuant to part 2 of this chapter.
( c ) Copies of all communications by the Director or the Director's designee under this section must be made available at the NRC Web site, *http://www.nrc.gov ,* and/or at the NRC Public Document Room, and must be furnished to DOE.
[53 FR 31658, Aug. 19, 1988, as amended at 64 FR 48954, Sept. 9, 1999]
Exhibit 35.2

Feb 28, 2014

Servicer Compliance Statement

For SEMT 2013-4 (see Schedule A)



| | (i) | a review of the Servicers activities during the reporting period from January 1, 2013 through December 31, 2013 and of its performance under the Agreement (each of the agreement and the reconstitution Agreement as
defined on Schedule A attached hereto) from the above referenced trust during such period has been made under such officers supervision, and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | to the best of such officers knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under this Agreement and any applicable Reconstitution Agreement in all material respects throughout
such reporting period (or applicable portion thereof) or, if there has been a failure to fulfill any such obligation in any material respect, specifically identifying each such failure known to such officer and the nature and the status thereof.
| | ---- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



First Republic BankBy:

/s/ Lionel AntunesName:

Lionel AntunesTitle:

Vice President of Residential LendingDate: Feb. 28, 2014




---

<for SEMT 2013-4>

SCHEDULE A



| | 1. | Flow Mortgage Loan Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of July 1, 2010, between Redwood Residential Acquisition Corporation and First Republic Bank, as modified by Reconstitution Agreement dated March 21, 2013.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
List of Small Entity Representatives (SERs) 

Name Industry/Sector Business Name 

David Kudlow Drugs and Druggists' Sundries 

Merchant Wholesalers 

All Terrain, Inc. 

Jennifer Kane Soap and Other Detergent 

Manufacturing 

Cedar Creek Products LLC 

Dan Siegel Medicinal and Botanical 

Manufacturing 

Dancing Roots Inc 

Steven Bessette Pesticide and Other Agricultural 

Chemical Manufacturing 

EcoSmart Technologies, Inc 

Dan Ritter Polish and Other Sanitation Good 

Manufacturing 

EES Inc. 

Rob Albert All Other Personal Services Evergreen Research 

Allen Jones Pesticide and Other Agricultural 

Chemical Manufacturing 

Homs, LLC 

Keith Onsdorff Pesticide and Other Agricultural 

Chemical Manufacturing 

Liquid Fence Company, Inc. 

Stephen Tvedten Other Chemical and Allied 

Products Merchant Wholesalers 

Safe Solutions, Inc. 

Mike Spargo Soap and Other Detergent 

Manufacturing 

Spargo Enterprises Inc. 

Sandy Maine Farm Supplies Merchant 

Wholesalers 

SunFeather Natural Soap 

Vern Schrum Pesticide and Other Agricultural 

Chemical Manufacturing 

Tender Corporation 

Jackie Mitchell Toilet Preparation Manufacturing W. S. Badger Company, Inc. 

Gene Lovalli Pesticide and Other Agricultural 

Chemical Manufacturing 

White Mountain Insect 

Repellent, LLC 

Carl Hughes Unclassified Establishments Whup A Bug Inc
Order entered November 3, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-00615-CV

MARK SCHWARZ, NEWCASTLE MANAGEMENT, L.P., ET AL., Appellants

V.

STEVEN J. PULLY, Appellee

On Appeal from the 298th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-11-0064-H

ORDER

We GRANT appellants’ October 31, 2014 motion for extension of time to file reply brief 

and ORDER the brief be filed no later than December 17, 2014. No further extensions will be 

granted absent exigent circumstances.

/s/ ADA BROWN 

JUSTICE
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Raymond Hauck, Respondent, v. Pillsbury Flour Mills et al., Appellants. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.

Greenblott, J.

Appeal by the employer and its carrier from a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Board, filed February 29, 1968, which found that claimant had a continuing causally related permanent partial disability subsequent to March 1, 1966 due to an occupational disease, and that claimant’s loss of earnings was attributable to this causally related disability. Prior to his retirement on March 1, 1966, respondent was employed as an oiler and grinder in appellant employer’s flour mill. Appellants concede that while thus employed, respondent sustained asthmatic bronchitis with emphysema, a causally related occupational disease, due to grain dust. The sole issue on this appeal is whether respondent was disabled and sustained any loss of earnings subsequent to March 1, 1966 which was causally related to his disability. Appellants contend that claimant was unable to secure employment, not because of any disability, but solely because of his retirement and the absence of available jobs. However, the board found that “ claimant’s loss of earnings are attributable to the causally related disability and occupational disease resulting from the exposure to the grain dust”. The record contains sufficient medical evidence to support the board’s conclusion that claim-' ant’s occupational disease was a substantial factor in bringing about his,loss of earnings. While an award may not be made where reduced earnings are caused by factors other than disability, an award is sustainable if the disability is even a contributory factor. (See *Matter of Wagner*v. *Emile & Robert Beauty Salon,*27 A D 2d 608.) Decision affirmed, with costs to the Workmen’s Compensation Board. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds, Cooke and Greenblott, JJ., concur in memorandum by Greenblott, J.