alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-27-1996
<CASH>                                           4,667
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   75,769
<ALLOWANCES>                                     4,129
<INVENTORY>                                    108,632
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               211,480
<PP&E>                                         121,034
<DEPRECIATION>                                  32,961
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 337,873
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           92,129
<BONDS>                                        122,597
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           223
<OTHER-SE>                                      98,063
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   337,873
<SALES>                                        256,621
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               256,621
<CGS>                                          195,331
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  195,331
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                63,872
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,014
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (7,661)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (3,095)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,566)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,566)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.21)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.21)
        

</TABLE>
IV 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 633 

Honoring Helen Sewell on the occasion of her retirement from the House 

of Representatives and expressing the gratitude of the House for her 

many years of service. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 17, 2005 

Mr. WELDON of Pennsylvania submitted the following resolution; which was 

referred to the Committee on House Administration 

RESOLUTION 

Honoring Helen Sewell on the occasion of her retirement 

from the House of Representatives and expressing the 

gratitude of the House for her many years of service. 

Whereas Helen Sewell, the proprietor of the concession stand 

in the Republican Cloak Room of the House of Representatives, through her long and devoted service to the 

House and its Members, has become a House institution 

in the minds and hearts of House Members; 

Whereas Helen Sewell has worked at the counter in the Cloak 

Room since she was a teenager in the 1930’s; 

Whereas Helen Sewell’s service to the House of Representatives is a continuation of a family tradition, as her father 

began working in the Cloak Room 87 years ago; 
2 

•HRES 633 IH 

Whereas Helen Sewell, as a result of her almost seven decades of service, has been present for some of the defining 

events in the Nation’s history and the House’s history, 

including the attack by Puerto Rican nationalists on 

March 1, 1954; 

Whereas Helen Sewell has established personal relationships 

with many of the 20th century’s most important Americans, including Presidents Ford, Nixon, and George 

H.W. Bush; 

Whereas Helen Sewell’s dedication to her work, and her careful attention to Members of the House, has provided both 

nourishment and friendship to Members of the House 

since the days of the Great Depression; 

Whereas Helen Sewell has demonstrated extraordinary 

strength and endurance by working long and difficult 

hours past her 80th year; 

Whereas Helen Sewell received the 1983 John W. McCormick 

Award of Excellence for her service to the Congress; 

Whereas all who have served as Members in the United 

States House of Representatives, and who have had occasion to meet Helen Sewell, believe that her service to the 

House is a matter of historical importance and should be 

commemorated; and 

Whereas Helen Sewell will retire officially from the House of 

Representatives on December 31, 2005: Now, therefore, 

be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives honors 

2 Helen Sewell on the occasion of her retirement and ex3 presses its gratitude for her many years of service. 

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         424,833
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  604,899
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,058,604
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               100,947
<PP&E>                                         658,234
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,847,517
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          491,623
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        36,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,909,777
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,847,517
<SALES>                                      1,089,905
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,089,905
<CGS>                                          708,642
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  295,334
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,782
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 72,147
<INCOME-TAX>                                    20,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             52,147
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    52,147
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .02
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 696 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
H. Res. 696

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                      January 18, 2018.
    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to take 
from the Speaker's table the bill (H.R. 195) to amend title 44, United States 
Code, to restrict the distribution of free printed copies of the Federal 
Register to Members of Congress and other officers and employees of the United 
States, and for other purposes, with the Senate amendment thereto, and to 
consider in the House, without intervention of any point of order, a motion 
offered by the chair of the Committee on Appropriations or his designee that the 
House concur in the Senate amendment with an amendment consisting of the text of 
Rules Committee Print 115-55. The Senate amendment and the motion shall be 
considered as read. The motion shall be debatable for one hour equally divided 
and controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on 
Appropriations. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the 
motion to its adoption without intervening motion.
    Sec. 2.  The requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII for a two-thirds vote 
to consider a report from the Committee on Rules on the same day it is presented 
to the House is waived with respect to any resolution reported through the 
legislative day of January 20, 2018.
    Sec. 3.  It shall be in order at any time through the legislative day of 
January 20, 2018, for the Speaker to entertain motions that the House suspend 
the rules as though under clause 1 of rule XV. The Speaker or his designee shall 
consult with the Minority Leader or her designee on the designation of any 
matter for consideration pursuant to this section.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
H. Res. 66

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

February 2, 2005.

Resolved, That the following Members be, and are hereby, elected to the following standing committees of the House

of Representatives:

COMMITTEE ON EDUCATION AND THE WORKFORCE: Mr.

Souder to rank after Mr. Johnson of Texas.

COMMITTEE ON FINANCIAL SERVICES: Mr. Pearce to

rank after Mr. Gerlach.

COMMITTEE ON INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS: Mr. Barrett of South Carolina to rank after Mr. Boozman.

COMMITTEE ON SMALL BUSINESS: Mr. Shuster to rank

after Mr. Akin, Mr. Bradley of New Hampshire to rank after

Mrs. Musgrave and Mr. Keller to rank after Mr. McCotter.

COMMITTEE ON VETERANS’ AFFAIRS: Mr. Nunes to

rank after Ms. Brown-Waite and Mr. Turner.

Attest:

Clerk.
Page 1 of 3

Disposition Comments

Docket No: FAA-2013-0364 These comments are in

Directorate ID: 2011-NM-114-AD response to an SNPRM

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

Next Step: FRAN SNPRM

 No Comments/Only Supportive Comments Received – If this box is checked, no signatures are 

required.

 Has the referenced service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? If yes, 

list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously 

published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance.

Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of 

each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues 

from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and 

describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA-IR-M-8040.1C Chapter 9.

ISSUE 1: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD: 

If NO, we don’t agree because 

ISSUE 2: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD:
Page 2 of 3

If NO, we don’t agree because 

For additional issues, double-click here
Page 3 of 3

Signature Section

Signature indicates concurrence with this action.

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

ASE Printed Name: Date

Branch Manager Date
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-7307
EDDIE C. WILSON, SR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versusBERNARD SMITH, Warden; MARSHA BROADDUS, Director of Medical Services; MICHAEL MURRAY,Hospital Administrator; PRISON HEALTH SERVICES, INCORPORATED, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Andre M. Davis, District Judge. (CA-96- 2318-AMD) Submitted: November 19, 1996 Decided: December 2, 1996 Before HAMILTON, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Eddie C. Wilson, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant, a federal inmate, appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) (1994), amended by Prison Litigation Reform Act, Pub. L. No. 104-134, 110 Stat. 1321 (1996). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Wilson v. Smith , No. CA-96-2318-AMD (D. Md. July 29, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1180 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
H. Res. 1180

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                     December 20, 2018.
    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to take 
from the Speaker's table the bill (H.R. 88) to modify the boundary of the Shiloh 
National Military Park located in Tennessee and Mississippi, to establish 
Parker's Crossroads Battlefield as an affiliated area of the National Park 
System, and for other purposes, with the Senate amendment thereto, and to 
consider in the House, without intervention of any point of order, a motion 
offered by the chair of the Committee on Ways and Means or his designee that the 
House concur in the Senate amendment with an amendment consisting of the text of 
Rules Committee Print 115-87. The Senate amendment and the motion shall be 
considered as read. The motion shall be debatable for one hour equally divided 
and controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on Ways 
and Means. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the motion to 
its adoption without intervening motion.
    Sec. 2.  On any legislative day of the second session of the One Hundred 
Fifteenth Congress after December 23, 2018--
             (a) the Journal of the proceedings of the previous day shall be 
        considered as approved; and
            (b) the Chair may at any time declare the House adjourned to meet at 
        a date and time, within the limits of clause 4, section 5, article I of 
        the Constitution, to be announced by the Chair in declaring the 
        adjournment.
    Sec. 3.  The Speaker may appoint Members to perform the duties of the Chair 
for the duration of the period addressed by section 2 of this resolution as 
though under clause 8(a) of rule I.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
#### Teddy’s Drive-In, Inc., Respondent, v. Richard L. Miller, as Executor of Harry L. Miller, Deceased, et al., Appellants.

In an action for a judgment declaring, *inter*alia, that plaintiff has the right to remove its diner structure from the real property of which plaintiff is "the lessee, in which action defendants counterclaimed for ejectment on the basis of plaintiff’s alleged breach of the lease, defendants appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated July 28, 1967, which, *inter*alia, (1) decreed that plain*931tiff (a) had not breached its lease by failing to keep the diner open and (b) has the right to remove the diner; and (2) dismissed the counterclaim. Judgment modified, on the law and the facts, by (1) deleting therefrom so much of decretal paragraph “ 2 ” as declared that plaintiff has the right to remove the diner and (2) adding a decretal paragraph that plaintiff may not use the demised premises as a parking lot except in connection with a diner conducted thereon. As so modified, judgment affirmed, without costs. We are of the opinion that the language of the lease clearly provides that the diner may not be removed until the termination of the lease and that the premises may be used for parking only for a business conducted on the premises and not for a business conducted on adjoining premises. Beldock, P. J., Christ, Munder and Martuseello, JJ., concur; Rabin, J., dissents and votes to affirm the judgment.
§ 950.25 Calculation of covered costs. ( a ) The Claims Administrator shall calculate the allowable amount of the covered costs claimed in the Certification of Covered Costs as follows: ( 1 ) *Costs covered through Program Account.* The principal or interest on any debt obligation financing the advanced nuclear facility for the duration of covered delay to the extent the debt obligation was included in the calculation of the loan cost; and
( 2 ) *Costs covered by Grant Account.* The incremental costs calculated for the duration of the covered delay. In calculating the incremental cost of power, the Claims Administrator shall consider: ( i ) *Fair Market Price.* The fair market price may be determined by the lower of the two options: The actual cost of the short-term supply contract for replacement power, purchased by the sponsor, during the period of delay, or for each day of replacement power by its day-ahead weighted average index price in $/MWh at the hub geographically nearest to the advanced nuclear facility as posted on the previous day by the Intercontinental Exchange (ICE) or an alternate electronic marketplace deemed reliable by the Department. The daily MWh assumed to be covered is no more than its nameplate capacity multiplied by 24 hours; multiplied by the capacity-weighted U.S. average capacity factor in the previous calendar year, including in the calculation any and all commercial nuclear power units that operated in the United States for any part of the previous calendar year; and multiplied by the average of the ratios of the net generation to the grid for calculating payments to the Nuclear Waste Fund to the nameplate capacity for each nuclear unit included. In addition, the Claims Administrator may consider “fair market price” from other published indices or prices at regional trading hubs and bilateral contracts for similar delivered firm power products and the costs incurred, including acquisition costs, to move the power to the contract-specified point of delivery, as well as the provisions of the covered contract regarding replacement power costs for delivery default; and
( ii ) *Contractual price of power.* The contractual price of power shall be determined as the daily weighted average price in equivalent $/MWh under a contractual supply agreement(s) for delivery of firm power that the sponsor entered into prior to any covered event. The daily MWh assumed to be covered is no more than the advanced nuclear facility's nameplate capacity multiplied by 24 hours; multiplied by the capacity-weighted U.S. average capacity factor in the previous calendar year, including in the calculation any and all commercial nuclear power units that operated in the United States for any part of the previous calendar year; and multiplied by the average of the ratios of the net generation to the grid for calculating payments to the Nuclear Waste Fund to the nameplate capacity for each nuclear unit included.
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

**____________** No. 22 - 40585 Summary Calendar

**____________ United States of America,**  Plaintiff
— Appellee **,** versus **Jose Edman Zamora -**  **Hernandez,** Defendant
— Appellant **.**

**______________________________** Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 2:22 - CR - 248 - 1

**______________________________** Before **Jones, Haynes,** and **Oldham,** Circuit Judges **. Per Curiam**  **:** ***** The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jose Edman Zamora - Hernandez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Zamora - Hernandez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the

**_____________________** * This opinion is not designated for publication. See **5th Cir . R.**  47.5. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED February 24, 2023 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 22-40585 Document: 00516656116 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/24/2023No. 22 - 40585

2 record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is **GRANTED** , counsel is excused from fu rther responsibilities herein, and the appeal is **DISMISSED** . See **5th Cir. R.** 42.2 . Case: 22-40585 Document: 00516656116 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/24/2023
PGI 253.213 Simplified acquisition

procedures (SF's 18, 30, 44, 1165, 1449, and

OF's 336, 347, and 348).

(f)(i) Use the OF 336, or a sheet of paper, as a continuation sheet for the DD Form 1155.

Continuation sheets may be printed on the reverse of the DD Form 1155.

(ii) DD Form 1155c-1, Order for Supplies or Services (Commissary Continuation Sheet) may be used

for commissary acquisitions.

PGI 253.213-70 Completion of DD Form 1155, Order for Supplies or Services.

Parent topic: PGI 253.2 -PRESCRIPTION OF FORMS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000812075
<NAME> UNO RESTAURANT CORP.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-03-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-28-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-27-1998
<CASH>                                           1,121
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,727
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      2,699
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 7,187
<PP&E>                                         198,312
<DEPRECIATION>                                  71,602
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 145,199
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           23,216
<BONDS>                                         48,988
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           138
<OTHER-SE>                                      72,857<F1>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   145,199
<SALES>                                         48,747
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                48,747
<CGS>                                           12,952
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   45,746
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    48
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 799
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,154
<INCOME-TAX>                                       711
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,443
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.14
<FN>
<F1>NET OF TREASURY STOCK
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
#### In re LEWIS.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

June 5, 1914.)

In the matter of Charles E. Lewis, deceased.

No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Order filed.