alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 727 Reported in House (RH)]

<DOC>

                                                 House Calendar No. 124
115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 727

                          [Report No. 115-547]

 Providing for consideration of the Senate amendment to the bill (H.R. 
 1892) to amend title 4, United States Code, to provide for the flying 
    of the flag at half-staff in the event of the death of a first 
                     responder in the line of duty.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 6, 2018

   Mr. Sessions, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Providing for consideration of the Senate amendment to the bill (H.R. 
 1892) to amend title 4, United States Code, to provide for the flying 
    of the flag at half-staff in the event of the death of a first 
                     responder in the line of duty.

    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order to take from the Speaker's table the bill (H.R. 1892) to amend 
title 4, United States Code, to provide for the flying of the flag at 
half-staff in the event of the death of a first responder in the line 
of duty, with the Senate amendment thereto, and to consider in the 
House, without intervention of any point of order, a motion offered by 
the chair of the Committee on Appropriations or his designee that the 
House concur in the Senate amendment with an amendment consisting of 
the text of Rules Committee Print 115-58 modified by the amendment 
printed in the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this 
resolution. The Senate amendment and the motion shall be considered as 
read. The motion shall be debatable for one hour equally divided and 
controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on 
Appropriations. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on 
the motion to its adoption without intervening motion.
                                                 House Calendar No. 124

115th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                              H. RES. 727

                          [Report No. 115-547]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 Providing for consideration of the Senate amendment to the bill (H.R. 
 1892) to amend title 4, United States Code, to provide for the flying 
    of the flag at half-staff in the event of the death of a first 
                     responder in the line of duty.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            February 6, 2018

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
#### § 782.3 Authority.

The General Counsel or the General Counsel's delegate is authorized to investigate, settle, deny, or otherwise dispose of all claims of patent and copyright infringement pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 2201(g), 2223, 5817(d) and 7261; the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961, 22 U.S.C. 2356 (formerly the Mutual Security Acts of 1951 and 1954); the Invention Secrecy Act, 35 U.S.C. 183; and 28 U.S.C. 1498.
#### PATTEN, Respondent, v. PATTEN, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

July 31, 1914.)

Action by Mary L. Patten against TIniack It. Patten, Jr.

No opinion. Motion to dismiss appeal denied, without costs. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.
# <!Congresg of tbe m1n{teb ~tate5 .' mmIaulJin~Qn. 

# m'!t 20510 July 16,20]3 Brooke Chapman Office of Aviation Analysis 1200New Jersey Ave, SE Washington DC 20590
. Dear Associate Director Chapman: ,-' "JT\ 

## 'ENT OF .';... •. ,'; I JTI 

## .;" :S?ORTATIO;J ""-',. OPERATIC ." '",,11'\[. ~i0 

## l:'lJ AUGIb A ~: 

## 24



## -~-- - ... 

### _,--- 

## -,~--_.-- ------_._--~-~_.



# _.. -. 1tis Withgreat enthusiasm that we offer our supportto.the Small Community Air Servite,Developit)ent (SCASD) grant application ofthe Duluth AirportAuthority andVisit Duluth. Duluth's SCASD application has broad support inthe localcommunity evident bythe public and private money committed as a local match. Duluth is a model candidate for the SCASD program due to its higher fares and limited air service connectivity. A recent leakage study revcaled that49% ofpotential passengers within a 30 mile radius 6f Duluth choose to drive 2 

### Yo hours to Minneapolis due inpartto higher fares and limited connectivity. The same study also shows that 70% ofDuluth's air passengers are outbound. These trends are reversible with the assistance oftlie SCASD program. The Duluth Airport Authority. in partnership with Visit Duluth, has developed a plan targeting travel from Chicago to Duluth in an effort to attract leisure travelers to the Duluth area. This effort will combat the 70% outbound passenger numbers directly bringingthe percentage closer to an industry acceptable 50%. Increased passengers to Duluth will assist the airport in working Witbeach of its airline partners to keep fares coinpetitive and provide additional frequencies. The economic.impact oftbisinv:estment.wilt also be felt inmany businesses ofthe rcgion as travelers stay in area hOltHs. eat inlocal res\iUliiihts,and shop inmany oftbe local small businesses that call Duluth home. The airport.and the community are on the cusp ofself-sustaining growth with the infusion of capital the. SCA_S~~~gram can_~ro'yj~e.We th~nk you will agree that Duluth's application makes a strong case. Thank you for your considemtionoftheii appficati6n~--
."-'- -_._-- - --_.- .•.• -------- Sincere

United States Senator United States Senator Richard M. Nolan Member ofCongresS

".'

.. ...'

## •...•.
#### PEOPLE ex rel. BROCK, Respondent, v. ANSCO CO., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

January 29, 1915.)

Proceeding by the People of the State of New York, on the relation of Charles Brock, against the Ansco Company.

C. A. Brodek, of New York City, for appellant. B. D. Whedon, of New York City, for respondent.

No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Order filed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         603,088
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               611,238
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 627,481
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           70,397
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        64,316
<OTHER-SE>                                     492,768
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   627,481
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                53,376
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,500
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (55,876)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (55,876)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 706,911
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   651,115
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.01
        

</TABLE>
ESA, NHPA, and Tribal Consultation Documents

MCU Facility PSD Permit Amendment
#### § 52.139 Standards for review of applications.

Applications filed under this subpart will be reviewed for compliance with the standards set out in 10 CFR parts 20, 50 and its appendices, and 10 CFR parts 73 and 100.
IV 

House Calendar No. 164 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 717 

[Report No. 109–415] 

Directing the Secretary of Commerce to transmit to the House of Representatives a copy of a workforce globalization final draft report produced 

by the Technology Administration. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 9, 2006 

Mr. GORDON (for himself, Mr. COSTELLO, Ms. EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON of 

Texas, Ms. WOOLSEY, Ms. HOOLEY, Mr. UDALL of Colorado, Mr. WU, 

Mr. HONDA, Mr. MILLER of North Carolina, Mr. DAVIS of Tennessee, 

Mr. LIPINSKI, Ms. JACKSON-LEE of Texas, Mr. SHERMAN, Mr. BAIRD, 

Mr. MATHESON, Mr. COSTA, Mr. AL GREEN of Texas, Mr. MELANCON, 

Mr. MOORE of Kansas, and Mr. CARNAHAN) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Science 

APRIL 7, 2006 

Additional sponsors: Mr. MCDERMOTT, Mr. CONYERS, Mr. GRIJALVA, Mr. 

RYAN of Ohio, and Mr. EVANS

APRIL 7, 2006 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

RESOLUTION 

Directing the Secretary of Commerce to transmit to the 

House of Representatives a copy of a workforce 

globalization final draft report produced by the Technology Administration. 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

HRES 717 RH 

1 Resolved, That the Secretary of Commerce is directed 

2 to transmit to the House of Representatives, not later 

3 than 14 days after the date of the adoption of this resolu4 tion, a copy of the final draft report, produced by the pro5 fessional staff of the Technology Administration, entitled: 

6 ‘‘Six-Month Assessment of Workforce Globalization In 

7 Certain Knowledge-Based Industries’’. 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS

ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
House Calendar No. 164 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 717 

[Report No. 109

–415] 

RESOLUTION 

Directing the Secretary of Commerce to transmit to 

the Technology Administration. force globalization final draft report produced by the House of Representatives a copy of a workAPRIL 7, 2006 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
###### Editorial Note on Part 63

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 63 appear at 81 FR 86909, Dec. 2, 2016.

#### § 63.343 Severability of individual protection and groundwater protection standards.

The individual protection and groundwater protection standards are severable.
Exhibit 31.1

              SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


I, D. Scott Wilkerson, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of BNP Residential
Properties, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

         (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
         disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
         supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
         registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
         us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
         which this report is being prepared;

         (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
         and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
         effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
         of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

         (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
         control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
         most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
         reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal
         control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors:

         (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
         or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
         reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
         record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

         (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
         other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
         internal control over financial reporting.



May 7, 2004                          /s/ D. Scott Wilkerson
                                 --------------------------------------------
                                 D. Scott Wilkerson
                                 President and Chief Executive Officer


                                       23
<PAGE>
IV 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 465 

Recognizing the commencement of Ramadan, the Islamic holy month of fasting and spiritual renewal, and commending Muslims in the United States 

and throughout the world for their faith. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 27, 2005 

Ms. EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON of Texas (for herself, Mr. MEEKS of New 

York, Mr. HONDA, Mr. LANTOS, Mr. CONYERS, Mrs. JONES of Ohio, Mr. 

GRIJALVA, Mr. ROTHMAN, Ms. MCCOLLUM of Minnesota, Mr. BURTON

of Indiana, Ms. BERKLEY, Mr. HOLT, Ms. JACKSON-LEE of Texas, Mr. 

DINGELL, Mr. FILNER, Mr. ABERCROMBIE, Mr. SERRANO, and Ms. 

SCHAKOWSKY) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 

the Committee on International Relations 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the commencement of Ramadan, the Islamic 

holy month of fasting and spiritual renewal, and commending Muslims in the United States and throughout 

the world for their faith. 

Whereas since the terrorist attacks on the United States on 

September 11, 2001, threats and incidents of violence 

have been directed at law-abiding, patriotic Americans of 

African, Arab, and South Asian descent, particularly 

members of the Islamic faith; 

Whereas on September 14, 2001, the House of Representatives passed a concurrent resolution condemning bigotry 
2 

•HRES 465 IH 

and violence against Arab-Americans, American Muslims, 

and Americans from South Asia in the wake of the terrorist attacks in New York, New York, and Washington, 

D.C.; 

Whereas it is estimated that there are approximately 

1,500,000,000 Muslims worldwide; 

Whereas Ramadan is the holy month of fasting and spiritual 

renewal for Muslims worldwide, and is the 9th month of 

the Muslim calendar year; and 

Whereas the observance of the Islamic holy month of Ramadan commences at dusk on October 15, 2005, and continues for one lunar month: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That— 

2 (1) during this time of conflict, in order to 

3 demonstrate solidarity with and support for mem4 bers of the community of Islam in the United States 

5 and throughout the world, the House of Representa6 tives recognizes the Islamic faith as one of the great 

7 religions of the world; and 

8 (2) in observance of and out of respect for the 

9 commencement of Ramadan, the Islamic holy month 

10 of fasting and spiritual renewal, the House of Rep11 resentatives acknowledges the onset of Ramadan and 

12 expresses its deepest respect to Muslims in the 

13 United States and throughout the world on this sig14 nificant occasion. 

Æ
#### Richard Zmyewski, Respondent, v Street Broadcasting Corp. et al., Appellants.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court at Special Term, entered January 30, 1980 in Schenectady County, which denied defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Order affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Mahoney, P. J., Greenblott, Main and Herlihy, JJ., concur.

Casey, J.,

dissents and votes to reverse in the following memorandum. Casey, J. (dissenting). I disagree with the conclusion of the majority that the plaintiff has demonstrated a cause of action sufficient to defeat the defendants’ motion for summary judgment, and, therefore, I dissent. The plaintiff’s complaint and affidavits submitted in opposition to the defendants’ motion are legally insufficient to sustain a cause of action for libel, and, accordingly, summary judgment dismissing the complaint should have been granted to the defendants by Special Term. The action arose out of the termination of the plaintiff’s employment by the defendants. Subsequent to the plaintiff’s discharge, the defendants received inquiries from prospective employers concerning the plaintiff’s performance of his duties and the reasons for his termination. In response, the defendants stated that the plaintiff was discharged because it was “our belief he falsified his daily sales report on at least one occasion”. To statements arising from the employer-employee relationship that admittedly existed between these parties, the law accords a qualified privilege *(Cheatum v Wehle,*5 NY2d 585; *Burns v Smith-Corona Marchant,*36 AD2d 400); and where, as here, the facts of that relationship and the statement made are admitted, the determination of the existence of a qualified privilege is a matter of law for the court *(Green v Kinsella,*36 AD2d 677). In turn, the existence of such privilege casts upon the plaintiff the burden of showing that in making the statement the defendants' abused the privilege by acting with malice motivated by ill will, spite or hostility *(Shapiro v Health Ins. Plan of Greater N. Y.,*7 NY2d *56; Rezey v Golub Corp.,*73 AD2d 772).

*959Neither the complaint nor the supporting affidavits have met this burden. The plaintiff is required to show evidentiary facts, not conclusions based upon surmise, conjecture and suspicion *(Shapiro v Health Ins. Plan of Greater N. Y., supra).*The plaintiff’s failure to meet the required burden compels the granting of the defendants’ motion for summary judgment *(Shapiro v Health Ins. Plan of Greater N. Ysupra).*This determination obviates the necessity of considering whether the statement made was true or false. The order of Special Term should be reversed and the complaint dismissed on the merits.
#### § 820.80 Basis and purpose.

This subpart implements the Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act of 1990 (the Act) (Pub. L. 101-410), as amended by the Debt Collection Improvement Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-134, section 31001) and the Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act Improvements Act of 2015 (Pub. L. 114-74, section 701). 28 U.S.C. 2461 note. As amended, the Act requires each agency head to adjust by regulation each civil monetary penalty provided by law within the jurisdiction of the Federal agency by the inflation adjustment specified in 28 U.S.C. 2461 note. This subpart increases the civil penalty amount specified in 42 U.S.C. 2282a.

[62 FR 46184, Sept. 2, 1997, as amended at 81 FR 41794, June 28, 2016]
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 6 (Thursday, January 9, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 1666]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-00150]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8581]

In the Matter of the Designation of Qari Saifullah Also Known as 
Qari Saifullah Al Tokhi Also Known as Qari Sahab as a Specially 
Designated Global Terrorist Pursuant to Section 1(b) of Executive Order 
13224, as Amended

    Acting under the authority of and in accordance with section 1(b) 
of Executive Order 13224 of September 23, 2001, as amended by Executive 
Order 13268 of July 2, 2002, and Executive Order 13284 of January 23, 
2003, I hereby determine that the individual known as Qari Saifullah, 
also known as Qari Saifullah Al Tokhi, also known as Qari Sahab, 
committed, or poses a significant risk of committing, acts of terrorism 
that threaten the security of U.S. nationals or the national security, 
foreign policy, or economy of the United States.
    Consistent with the determination in section 10 of Executive Order 
13224 that ``prior notice to persons determined to be subject to the 
Order who might have a constitutional presence in the United States 
would render ineffectual the blocking and other measures authorized in 
the Order because of the ability to transfer funds instantaneously,'' I 
determine that no prior notice needs to be provided to any person 
subject to this determination who might have a constitutional presence 
in the United States, because to do so would render ineffectual the 
measures authorized in the Order.
    This notice shall be published in the Federal Register.

    Dated: October 30, 2013.
John F. Kerry,
Secretary of State.
[FR Doc. 2014-00150 Filed 1-8-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-10-P
```