alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         231,029
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               231,029
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 231,029
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          10,453
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       2,814
<OTHER-SE>                                     217,762
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   231,029
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               8,287
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               12,843
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,556)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,556)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,556)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        


</TABLE>
#### Evans *v.*Daughtry *et al.*

*Petition by Sitrety on Guardianes Bond for Supersedeas of Execution and Discharge from Decree on Final Settlement.*

1. *Signing bond by surety, on condition.*— A surety on a guardian’s bond may sign it conditionally, and leave it with his principal, to be delivered, and to become valid and operative, only if and when other pei'sons named have also signed it as sureties; and if it is delivered by the principal without the additional signatures, the surety so signingys not bound by it, unless he has estopped himself from denying his liability, by allowing the guardian to act in that capacity under the bond, having knowledge of the abuse of confidence, or notice of facts which *are*the equivalent of knowledge.

Appeal from Bullock Probate Court.

Heard before Hon. S. F. Frazer.

W. F. Foster, for appellant.

Norman & Son, *contra.*

STONE, C. J.

There is no conflict in the testimony in this case. It fully proves that Evans signed the bond conditionally, and left it with Eaney, his principal, with the understanding and instruction, that he was not to become a surety on the bond, unless Pearson and Scott became co-sureties with him. In other words, it was left with him as an escrow. ‘ Neither Pearson nor Scott signed the bond, and it results, if there is nothing else in the transaction, that Evans is not bound as a surety on the *bond.*— Bibb *v. Reid,*3 Ala. 88; *Guild v. Thomas,*54 Ala. 414; *Marks v. First National Bank,*79 Ala. 550; *Smith v. Kirkland,*81 Ala. 345. The court below found, as fact, that Evans did sign on the conditions claimed.

2. It was contended in the Probate Court, and the court so ruled, that Evans, by permitting Eaney to obtain the appointment of guardian on said bond, and to act under it, had estopped himself to deny his liability as surety.— *Wright v. Lang,*66 Ala. 389, is relied on, as supporting this view. The principle is certainly sound, if the facts justify its application to this case. To make this principle applicable, *69however, it must be shown that the party sought to be estopped had knowledge that his confidence had been abused, or had 'notice of some suggestive fact, which, if followed up, would have led to such *knowledge.*— Howe *v.*Ashley, 60 Ala. 496; *Burns v. Campbell,*71 Ala. 271; *Herring v. Skaggs,*73 Ala. 446.

The testimony in this case, if . believed, shows that Evans took prompt measures to avert any injury that might result from an improper use of his name. There is no testimony that he even knew that Raney had been appointed guardian, until shortly before the latter was brought to settlement; nor is there proof of fact or circumstance, which made it his duty to inquire. If any such facts existed, they are not proved. Under the facts, as shown in the record. Evans is entitled to have the execution so modified as to strike his name therefrom, and to be discharged from all liability as one of the sureties.

Reversed and remanded.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1089 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1089

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that a replacement 
for the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act should have certain 
                               features.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 27, 2018

Mr. Sessions (for himself, Mr. Faso, Mr. Cole, Mr. Bacon, Ms. Granger, 
    Mr. Hill, Mr. Amodei, Mr. Byrne, Mr. Gianforte, Mr. Lance, Mr. 
    Mitchell, Mr. Johnson of Ohio, Mr. Poe of Texas, Mr. Bishop of 
Michigan, Ms. Tenney, Mr. Olson, Mr. Buck, Mr. Meadows, and Mr. Cramer) 
submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee 
                         on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that a replacement 
for the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act should have certain 
                               features.

    Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives that 
a replacement for the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 
(Public Law 111-148) should do the following:
            (1) Allow States to ask for and receive broad authority to 
        reform their individual health insurance markets provided that 
        any such reform--
                    (A) ensures that individuals with preexisting 
                conditions experience--
                            (i) lower premiums;
                            (ii) lower out-of-pocket costs; and
                            (iii) greater accessibility to in-network 
                        providers;
                    (B) takes steps towards ensuring that individuals 
                who pay premiums to group health plans and then become 
                too sick to work have access to individual health 
                insurance coverage that is similar to such group health 
                plans in price, quality, and access to care, regardless 
                of any preexisting condition; and
                    (C) has an impact on Federal finances that is 
                budget neutral.
            (2) Grant States the authority necessary--
                    (A) to create market conditions which provide 
                incentives to insurance companies to provide coverage 
                to individuals with an expensive health condition, 
                including cancer, diabetes, and heart disease; and
                    (B) to allow individuals to use health savings 
                accounts and individual insurance plans for more 
                services.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 1402.4 Foreign entity.

*Foreign entity* means both “foreign public entity” and “foreign organization,” as defined in 2 CFR 200.1.

[84 FR 45635, Aug. 30, 2019, as amended at 86 FR 57531, Oct. 18, 2021]
#### § 905.51 Transmission planning principles.

Western's transmission planning is conducted to assess the capability of the Federal transmission system to provide adequate and reliable electric service to its customers and the interconnected power grid. These planning efforts occur as part of its participation in regional and sub-regional planning entities as well as Western's Open Access Transmission Tariff.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 235 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                        April 27, 2005.
    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in order 
without intervention of any point of order to consider in the House the 
resolution (H. Res. 22) expressing the sense of the House of Representatives 
that American small businesses are entitled to a Small Business Bill of Rights. 
The amendments to the resolution and the preamble recommended by the Committee 
on Small Business now printed in the resolution are considered as adopted. The 
previous question shall be considered as ordered on the resolution and preamble, 
as amended, to final adoption without intervening motion or demand for division 
of the question except: (1) one hour of debate equally divided and controlled by 
the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on Small Business; and 
(2) one motion to recommit, which may not contain instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
### SERVE D JUN E3 , 201 0
U.S
. DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO N

OFFIC EO FHEARING S WASHINGTON , D C
INTH EMATTE RO F RUSHMOR EHELICOPTERS , INC
. FA A DOCKE T NO
. CP10GL000 2 (Civi l Penalty Action ) DM S No
. FA A - 201 0 - 002 3 

### AMENDE D PROCEDURA L ORDE R Paragrap h# 2 o f

th e Procedura l Orde r

i s amende da s follows : WHEREFORE , th e partie s b e an dar e hereb y ORDERE D t o adher e t o th e followin g procedura l schedule :

.. . O n o r before Septembe r

1 , 2010 , th e partie s shal l conclud e al l discover y including , bu t

not limite dto , depositions , documen t production , response s t o productio n request s and/o r interrogatories
. I f

th e partie s canno t

resolv e a discovery disput e the y shal l submi t th e disput e t o th e undersigne dfo r resolutio n i n atimel y manner.. .

-T-lR^ichar dJCr-Ot)^! ^ \ ^
• tJ.S
. Administrativ e La w Judg e Attachmen t

- Servic e Lis t

Th e cour t doe s not anticipat e scheduling thi s cas e prior to 1 Septembe

r 2010
.FA A Docke t No
. CP10GL000 2 (Civi l Penalty Action ) SERVIC ELIS T ORIGINA L& ON ECOP Y Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W
. Washington , D C 2059 1 Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC-43 0 Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit e 2W1000 ' ON ECOP Y Michae l Jacob , Responden t Presiden t o r CE O Rushmor e Helicopters , Inc
. 2456 4 Highway 16/38 5 Custer , S D 5773 0 Chri s G
. Zurales , Complainant' s Counse l Great Lake s Region , AGL- 7 Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n 230 0 Eas t Devo n Avenu e Des Plaines , IL60018-469 6 TEL : 847-294-771 3 FAX : 847-294-749 8 Th e Honorabl e Richar dC
. Goodwin , Administrativ e Law Judg e Offic e o f Hearings , M-2 0 U.S
. Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E
. Eas t Buildin g Groun dFloor , Roo mEl2-32 0 Washington , D C 2059 0 TEL : 202-366-213 9 Attorney-Adviso r 202-366-512 1 Lega l Assistan t FAX : 202-366-753 6

' Service was b

y U.S
. Mail
. Fo

r servic e i n person o r b y expeditedcourier , us e the followin g address : Federa l Aviation Administration , 600 Independenc e Avenue , S.W. , Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit

e 2W1000 , Washington , D

C 20591 ; Attention : Hearing Docke t Clerk, AGC-430
.
###### Editorial Note on Part 9

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 9 appear at 82 FR 52825, Nov. 15, 2017.

#### § 9.102 General requirement.

Commissioners shall not jointly conduct or dispose of Commission business in Commission meetings other than in accordance with this subpart. Except as provided in § 9.104, every portion of every meeting of the Commission shall be open to public observation.
#### § 1120.305 Requirement for general terms and conditions.

Each DoD Component must establish at least one set of general terms and conditions. A DoD Component may have more than one set, as it deems appropriate to reflect differences in its award terms and conditions across different programs, classes of recipients, or types of activity.
- Home
- Data Products
- County-level Data Sets
- Unemployment
#### WALKER v. JURYAN.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

June 19, 1914.)

Action by William It. Walker against Ike Juryan.

No opinion. Application denied, with $10 costs. Order signed. See, also, 148 N. Y. Supp. 1149.
#### Security Mutual Life Insurance Company et al., Respondents, v. Seymour Arenstein et al., Appellants.

Judgment entered September 11, 1968, herein appealed from, unanimously modified on the law and the facts, so as to vacate so much of the second decretal paragraph as declares Security Mutual Life Insurance Company policy number 447023 to be null and void and to substitute therefor a declaration that such policy be reinstated. As so modified the judgment appealed from is otherwise affirmed, without costs or disbursements to either party. We find and determine that as to policy number 447023 there was a specific request to put into operation the policy provision for Automatic Premium Loans. At the time of such request there was a dividend accumulation of $543, and a loan value in the amount of $359 which total sum was more than sufficient to pay a quarterly premium. The reply to such request was not responsive and perhaps somewhat misleading. This caused the insured to make application for reinstatement when, in fact, it should not have been necessary to do so. The contention of plaintiff that the insured, by making application for reinstatement of the policy, is estopped from now claiming such policy did not lapse is found to be without merit. *Struhl*v. *Travelers Ins. Co.*(255 App. Div. 527, affd. 281 N. Y. 584) upon which plaintiff places some measure of reliance, may be readily, distinguished. In that ease the primary issue concerned the timeliness of the premium payment, and in the request for reinstatement of the policy plaintiff acknowledged that the policy had lapsed for nonpayment. The promissory note represent*900ing part payment of the quarterly premium payment was not paid on the due date and the court so found upon plaintiff’s own testimony. It was against such background the court stated “ that recovery for plaintiff was precluded by his written application for reinstatement of the policy, wherein he certified that the policy had lapsed for non-payment of premium. By applying for reinstatement, plaintiff agreed with the insurance company that the policy had lapsed” (p. 531). That is not the situation in the case before us where plaintiff made a specific request which should have resulted in an automatic premium change. Concur—Stevens, P. J., Eager, Capozzoli, Nunez and Steuer, JJ.
-86 -84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72

32 34 36 38 40 

### ★

▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 500 18 12 06 00 08/16 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 16 Aug 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.54 N 76.62 WMeters AGL
H. Res. 721

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

July 18, 2006.

Whereas the aftermath of 40 years of internal political turmoil forced hundreds of thousands of individuals in the 

Republic of El Salvador to flee that country and seek 

peace and security in a new country, the United States; 

Whereas Salvadoran-Americans constitute a significantly 

growing population in the United States, with the majority living in the Los Angeles metropolitan area, the 

Washington, D.C., metropolitan area, and various other 

areas in the United States; 

Whereas the history of the United States is a rich and enduring tapestry woven with the threads of many remarkable 

lives, cultures, and events, and the lives, work, and artistry of Salvadoran-Americans have added strength, vitality, and purpose to that tapestry; 

Whereas the maturing Salvadoran-American community continues to make great economic and cultural contributions 

to daily life in the United States; 

Whereas many of these Salvadoran-Americans actively participate in the United States educational system, further 

promoting their sense of American pride within communities in this country; 
2

•HRES 721 EH 

Whereas Salvadoran-American families should have an established day to acknowledge the contribution and value of 

their culture to the United States; 

Whereas the strength of the Salvadoran-American culture can 

be preserved and passed on to future generations; 

Whereas Salvadoran-American families, communities, and 

generations that follow are committed to maintain both 

Salvadoran and American cultures, while promoting cultural interchange; 

Whereas free of prejudices and as proud men and women, 

Salvadoran-Americans participate and contribute to the 

social, educational, professional, and political systems of 

the United States; 

Whereas Salvadoran-American individuals, families, organizations, and communities in cities and States across the 

Nation wish to share the establishment of a nationally 

recognized and celebrated Salvadoran-American Day (El 

Dia del Salvadoren ̃o), beginning on August 6, 2005, and 

to be celebrated by all generations that follow; 

Whereas on August 6, 1525, the official founding of Villa De 

San Salvador was declared in the Valle de las Hamacas 

(Valley of the Hammocks) where the indigenous ancestors of El Salvador fought historic battles against the 

submission and abuse of Spanish colonialism in order to 

preserve the life and liberty of the Cuscatleco population; 

and 

Whereas August 6 is a day of recognition for SalvadoranAmericans to celebrate throughout the United States: 

Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives supports 

the goals and ideals of a Salvadoran-American Day (El Dia 
3

•HRES 721 EH 

del Salvadoren ̃o) in recognition of all Salvadoran-Americans 

for their hard work, dedication, and contribution to the stability and well-being of the United States. 

Attest:

Clerk.
#### The State of Ohio, Appellant, *v.*Battease, Appellee.

[Cite as *State v. Battease,*116 Ohio St.3d 1207, 2007-Ohio-6457.]

(No. 2007-0157

Submitted November 28, 2007

Decided December 11, 2007.)

Joseph T. Deters, Hamilton County Prosecuting Attorney, and Philip R. Cummings, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant.

Schuh *&*Goldberg, L.L.P., and Richard J. Goldberg, for appellee.

{¶ 1} The cause is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently accepted.

Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.

O’Donnell, J., dissents.
#### § 820.52 Procedures.

The General Counsel may utilize any procedure which he deems appropriate to comply with his responsibilities under this subpart. All interpretations issued under this subpart must be filed with the Office of the Docketing Clerk which shall maintain a docket for interpretations.
#### REINCKE v. TEXAS CO.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

July 10, 1914.)

Action by Edgar A. Reincke against the Texas Company.

No opinion. Motion denied, with $10 costs. Order filed. See, also, 148 N. Y. Supp. 1140.
#### § 182.665 State.

State means any of the States of the United States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, or any territory or possession of the United States.
Federal Depository Library ProgramPersistent URL Home Page      

# Target for /GPO/LPS5210 lost

The target resource for this PURL can no longer be traced. The following is a list of the targets this PURL was previously assigned to.

Powered by the Federal Depository Library Program.                A service of the U.S. Government Publishing Office.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable  material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel; Member Conflict: Cardiac Development.                    

*Date:*                         January 4, 2011.                    

*Time:*                         3 p.m. to 4 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892. (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Joseph Thomas Peterson, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 4118, MSC 7814, Bethesda, MD 20892. 301-443-8130.                    

This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333, 93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: December 21, 2010.

Jennifer S. Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2010-32639 Filed 12-27-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P