alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

SEAN WELLS ,

Appellant ,

v. Case No. 5D 17

- 1257
STATE OF FLORIDA ,

Appellee

. ________________________________/ Opinion filed January 2 6 , 2018 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Brevard County , W. David Dugan , Judge. James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Sean K evin Gravel, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Allison L eigh Morris, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM

. Appellant, Sean Wells, appeals the trial court ’ s order revoking his probation an d sentencing him to thirty months in prison . We affirm, but remand for a corrected ord er. The trial court orally found Appellant guilty of violating Condition 1 of his probation for failing to report in December 2016 and January 2017. At sentencing, defense counsel2

conceded that Appellant qualified as a violent felony offender o f special c oncern, and the trial court made the oral pronouncement that Appellant ’s release posed a danger to the community pursuant to section 948.06(8)(e), Florida Statutes (2016)

. On appeal, Appellant argues (1) the finding that he violated his probation was not supported by competent, substantial evidence, and (2) the trial court erred by failing to
include its reasons for finding that he posed a danger to the community in its written order

. We affirm the trial court’s revocation o f Appellant ’s probation without further
discussion

. However, the State concedes that remand is appropriate for the trial court to
reduce its orally pronounced reasons for finding that Appellant presents a danger to the community to writing. See Bell v. State , 150 So. 3d 1214 (Fla. 5th DCA 2014) ; see also
Ar n on e v. State , 204 So. 3d 556 , 557 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016) (“ [W] here a court orally pronounces a reason, consistent with one or more of the factors listed under section 948.06(8)(e) 1

. , for its finding that the defendant, as a violent felony offender of special concern, poses a danger to the community, but fails to provide written reasons for its finding, the proper remedy is to affirm the revoca tion of the defendant ’ s probation, but remand for entry of a writt en order conforming to the court’ s oral pronouncement. ”)

. Similarly , we no te that although the trial court orally pronounced its finding that Appellant
violated probation, the written order revoking probation does not specify which condition Appellant violated. See Brown v. State , 225 So. 3d 399, 400 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017). Thus , on remand, the trial court should enter a corrected order with appropriate written findings

. AFFIRMED AND REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS

. PALMER , WALLIS and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### USDA Forest Service

# SUMMARY:

The Siskiyou County Resource Advisory Committee (RAC) will hold its first meeting in 2011 on January 17th.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held on January 17th, 2011 and will begin at 4 p.m.

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be held at the Klamath National Forest Supervisor's Office, Conference Room, 1312 Fairlane Road, Yreka, CA.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Kerry Greene, Committee Coordinator, USDA, Klamath National Forest, Supervisor's Office, 1312 Fairlane Road, Yreka, CA 96097. (530) 841-4484; E-MAIL                         *kggreene@fs.fed.us.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The agenda includes project updates and financial status, and presentation and review of new project proposals to be considered by the RAC. The meeting is open to the public. Opportunity for public comment will be provided and individuals will have the opportunity to address the Committee at that time.

Dated: December 10, 2010.

Kelly Russell,

Deputy Forest Supervisor.

[FR Doc. 2010-31897 Filed 12-17-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-P
IV 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 498 

Supporting the goals and ideals of School Bus Safety Week. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 18, 2005 

Mr. DUNCAN submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Government Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Supporting the goals and ideals of School Bus Safety Week. 

Whereas approximately 480,000 yellow school buses carry 25 

million children to and from school every weekday; 

Whereas America’s 480,000 school buses comprise the largest 

mass transportation fleet in the country, 2.5 times the 

size of all other forms of mass transportation—transit, 

intercity buses, commercial airlines, and rail—combined; 

Whereas during the school year, school buses make more 

than 50 million passenger trips daily carrying the Nation’s future—our children; 

Whereas school bus transportation is eight times safer than 

traveling in a passenger vehicle and is the safest form of 

ground transportation available; 

Whereas school buses meet higher construction, equipment, 

and inspection standards than any other vehicle, and 
2 

•HRES 498 IH 

school bus drivers meet higher qualification, training, and 

testing standards than any other drivers; 

Whereas according to the National Academy of Sciences, an 

average of 820 students are killed annually during school 

transportation hours, but less than 2 percent of them are 

school bus passengers; 

Whereas despite the industry’s best efforts, accidents still 

happen; 

Whereas an average of seven school-age passengers are killed 

in school bus crashes each year, and an average of 19 

children are killed each year getting on and off the bus; 

Whereas most of those killed are children aged five to seven, 

and most often those children are killed in the area immediately surrounding the bus—either by a passing vehicle or by the bus itself; 

Whereas School Bus Safety Week, which is celebrated in 

more than 40 States and sponsored by the National 

Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), was 

created to remind all students of the best ways to get on 

and off the bus in an effort to enhance the safety of the 

Nation’s children; 

Whereas School Bus Safety Week, which dates back to 1966, 

also recognizes the hard work and dedication of school 

transportation personnel, especially the many school bus 

drivers who ensure a safe journey each and every day; 

and 

Whereas School Bus Safety Week, celebrated the third week 

in October, promotes awareness through local and State 

poster and speech contests, lessons utilizing school bus 

safety community awareness kits, and other activities 
3 

•HRES 498 IH 

built around themes that raise awareness of school bus 

safety issues: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives supports 

2 the goals and ideals of School Bus Safety Week. 

Æ
EXHIBIT 32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 (AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sionix Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James R. Currier, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify to my knowledge and in my capacity as an officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and,


2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.






Date: May 10, 2011
By:
/s/ James R. CurrierJames R. CurrierChairman, Chief Executive Officer, and Principal Executive Officer





A certification furnished pursuant to this Item will not be deemed “filed” for purposes of section 18 of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78r), or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the registrant specifically incorporates it by reference.
#### § 733.3 Definitions.

The following terms used in this part are defined as follows:

*Contract* is defined in 2 CFR 200.22.

*DOE* means the U.S. Department of Energy (including the National Nuclear Security Administration).

*DOE Element* means a major division of DOE, usually headed by a Presidential appointee, which has a delegation of authority to carry out activities by entering into contracts or financial assistance agreements.

*Fabrication* means making up data or results and recording or reporting them.

*Falsification* means manipulating research materials, equipment, or processes, or changing or omitting data or results such that the research is not accurately represented in the research record.

*Financial assistance agreement* means an agreement the primary purpose of which is to provide appropriated funds to stimulate an activity, including but not limited to, grants and cooperative agreements pursuant to 2 CFR part 200 as amended by 2 CFR part 910.

*Finding of research misconduct* means a determination, based on a preponderance of the evidence, that research misconduct has occurred. Such a finding requires a conclusion that there has been a significant departure from accepted practices of the relevant research community and that it be knowingly, intentionally, or recklessly committed.

*Plagiarism* means the appropriation of another person's ideas, processes, results, or words without giving appropriate credit.

*Research* means all basic, applied, and demonstration research in all fields of science, engineering, and mathematics, such as research in economics, education, linguistics, medicine, psychology, social sciences, statistics, and research involving human subjects or animals.

*Research misconduct* means fabrication, falsification, or plagiarism in proposing, performing, or reviewing research, or in reporting research results, but does not include honest error or differences of opinion.

*Research record* means the record of all data or results that embody the facts resulting from scientists' inquiries, including, but not limited to, research proposals, laboratory records, both physical and electronic, progress reports, abstracts, theses, oral presentations, internal reports, and journal articles

[70 FR 37014, June 28, 2005, as amended at 79 FR 76047, Dec. 19, 2014]
EX-35.5
(logo) WELLS FARGO

Corporate Trust Services

MAC R1204-010
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045

Tel: 410 884 2000
Fax: 410 715 2380

GS Mortgage Securities Corporation II
200 West Street
New York, New York 10282


RE: Annual Statement of Compliance for GS Mortgage Securities Corporation II,
    Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2013-GC10

Per the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of February 1, 2013 (the
"Agreement"), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank,
N.A., as Certificate Administrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows
as of and for the year ending December 31, 2013 (the "Reporting Period"):

(a) A review of Wells Fargo's activities during the Reporting Period and of its
performance under the Agreement has been made under such officer's supervision;
and

(b) To the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo
has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material
respects throughout the Reporting Period.


March 10, 2014

/s/ Brian Smith
BRIAN SMITH
Vice President

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
###### Editorial Note on Part 72

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 72 appear at 80 FR 74981, Dec. 1, 2015, and at 81 FR 86910, Dec. 2, 2016.

#### § 72.162 Test control.

The licensee, applicant for a license, certificate holder, and applicant for a CoC shall establish a test program to ensure that all testing, required to demonstrate that the structures, systems, and components will perform satisfactorily in service, is identified and performed in accordance with written test procedures that incorporate the requirements of this part and the requirements and acceptance limits contained in the ISFSI, MRS, or spent fuel storage cask license or CoC. The test procedures must include provisions to ensure that all prerequisites for the given test are met, that adequate test instrumentation is available and used, and that the test is performed under suitable environmental conditions. The licensee, applicant for a license, certificate holder, and applicant for a CoC shall document and evaluate the test results to ensure that test requirements have been satisfied.
May 16, 2015

U. S. Department of Transportation Docket

Management System

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE

Washington DC 20590

Re: Additional aircraft to be listed on Lewanui UAS exemption #11558

Dear Sir or Madam:

We ’ d like to add another version of a sUA already listed on our exemption. We were approved to operate

the DJI Phantom 2 and Inspire 1 series, all of which are being registered with the Registration Branch per

our exemption . We ’ d like to add the Phantom 3, in addition to our already pending requests for the

S1000 and S900 aircraft.

The Phantom 3 we are requesting possesses the same operating specs and weight criteria but with

upgrades to the electronics making t his aircraft even safer to operate than its predecessor

.

I ’ ve attached the operating manual in the docket in addition to the previous request and operating manual

for the S1000.

S i ncerely yours,

Timothy Lerma

Lewanui
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sionix Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending December 31, 2002, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), the undersigned, James J.
Houtz, President of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

                  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

                  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
                      in all material respects, the financial condition and
                      results of operations of the Company.

Date: February 13, 2003                                      /s/ James R. Houtz
                                                             ------------------
                                                                 James R. Houtz
                                                                 President

         This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
# EUR-Lex - 31970R0538 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31970R0538

**Regulation (EEC) No 538/70 of the Commission of 23 March 1970 amending Regulation (EEC) No 315/68 as regards the size of anemone coronaria **

*
Official Journal L 067 , 24/03/1970 P. 0012 - 0012 Finnish special edition: Chapter 3 Volume 3 P. 0022 Danish special edition: Series I Chapter 1970(I) P. 0140 Swedish special edition: Chapter 3 Volume 3 P. 0022 English special edition: Series I Chapter 1970(I) P. 0159 Greek special edition: Chapter 03 Volume 5 P. 0072 Spanish special edition: Chapter 03 Volume 3 P. 0206 Portuguese special edition Chapter 03 Volume 3 P. 0206 *

REGULATION (EEC) No 538/70 OF THE COMMISSION of 23 March 1970 amending Regulation (EEC) No 315/68 as regards the size of anemone coronaria

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community;

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 234/68 (1) of 27 February 1968 on the establishment of a common organisation of the market in live trees and other plants, bulbs, roots and the like, cut flowers and ornamental foliage, and in particular Article 4 thereof;

Whereas experiments by an experimental station have shown that under present production techniques good quality anemone coronaria can be obtained from tubers of a size smaller than that provided for by the common quality standards ; whereas, therefore, those standards should be adjusted;

Whereas the measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the Opinion of the Management Committee for Live Plants;

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

In the Table appearing in Section III of the Annex to Regulation (EEC) No 315/68, as last amended by Regulation (EEC) No 448/69, (2) the text in the Annex to this Regulation shall be substituted for the text referring to "anemone coronaria".

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the third day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 23 March 1970.

For the Commission

The President

Jean REY (1)OJ No L 55, 2.3.1968, p. 1. (2)OJ No L 61, 12.3.1969, p. 1.

ANNEX

>PIC FILE= "T0002320">
§ 706.30 Clearance of certain local union representatives. It is recognized that security clearance of certain union representatives may be necessary to assure opportunity for effective representation of employees in collective bargaining relationships with DOE contractors. Accordingly, DOE managers may authorize investigation for “Q” clearance of union officials whose functions as representatives of employees may reasonably be expected to require access to Restricted Data under NLRB and other procedures according to applicable law (LMRA, 1947); to effectively perform their representation functions in the resolution of grievances and in other collective bargaining relationships with contractors; to effectuate the recommendation of the President's Commission on Labor Relations in the Atomic Energy Installations in respect to integration of the union into the plant organization “as to two-way channel of communication and a medium of understanding between management and workers”. ( a ) In the pre-contract stage of union-management relations, the requirements of the Labor Management Relations Act normally will be the applicable criteria for determining which bargaining representatives, if any, will need access to classified material in the exercise of their functions as employee representatives.
( b ) After a bargaining relationship has been established between the contractor and the representatives of its employees the nature of this relationship and the procedures followed in it normally will be the controlling criteria for determination of the access to be granted to particular persons in carrying out their functions as employee representatives. For example, many contract grievance procedures designate by title certain union and management officials who are to have definite roles in the resolution of grievances under the procedure. Investigation for “Q” clearance will normally be in order for such officials, both company and union, employee, and non-employee. In addition, persons not so designated may be investigated for clearance where the company and the union advise DOE manager that their established relationships contemplate access for such persons.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM BODDIE-NOELL
PROPERTIES, INC. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED MARCH
31, 1999, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                            DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                               JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                 MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           943,814
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                          0
<ALLOWANCES>                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                            0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               3,384,036
<PP&E>                                       244,509,209
<DEPRECIATION>                               (21,283,961)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               231,269,684
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2,251,931
<BONDS>                                      149,923,480
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                      72,330,482
<OTHER-SE>                                   (16,470,827)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 231,269,684
<SALES>                                                0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               8,360,466
<CGS>                                                  0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  4,040,754
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 612,783
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             2,682,359
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  810,486
<INCOME-TAX>                                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              810,486
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                     810,486
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                       0.14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       0.14
        



</TABLE>