alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# EUR-Lex - 31978R3056 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31978R3056

**Commission Regulation (EEC) No 3056/78 of 22 December 1978 fixing the Community frontier crossing point for imported olive oil **

*
Official Journal L 361 , 23/12/1978 P. 0055 - 0055 Finnish special edition: Chapter 3 Volume 10 P. 0134 Greek special edition: Chapter 03 Volume 23 P. 0203 Swedish special edition: Chapter 3 Volume 10 P. 0134 Spanish special edition: Chapter 03 Volume 15 P. 0078 Portuguese special edition Chapter 03 Volume 15 P. 0078 *

COMMISSION REGULATION (EEC) No 3056/78 of 22 December 1978 fixing the Community frontier crossing point for imported olive oil

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation No 136/66/EEC of 22 September 1966 on the establishment of a common organization of the market in oils and fats (1), as last amended by Regulation (EEC) No 1562/78 (2), and in particular Article 9 thereof,

Whereas under Article 9 of Regulation No 136/66/EEC it is forthe for the to determine the frontier crossing point for which the threshold price is fixed;

Whereas most imports of olive oil enter the Community through the Mediterranean ports on the coast of Northern Italy ; whereas Imperia is particularly representative of these ports, since a large industry using imported olive oil is situated there ; whereas this port should therefore be chosen as the Community frontier crossing point;

Whereas the measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Oils and Fats,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The Community frontier crossing point referred to in Article 9 of Regulation No 136/66/EEC shall be Imperia in Italy.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 22 December 1978.

For the Commission

Finn GUNDELACH

Vice-President (1)OJ No 172, 30.9.1966, p. 3025/66. (2)OJ No L 185, 7.7.1978, p. 1.
223 So.2d 407

#### LOUISIANA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY v. George A. LASSEIGNE, Jr., et al., Miss Yvonne Brady et al., Peter J. Brady et al.

No. 49847.

June 13, 1969.

In re: George A. Lasseigne, Jr., et al., applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of St. John the Baptist. 220 So.2d 475.

It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be notified.
1 Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-31220 Summary Calendar

LARRY E. CLARK; ET AL,

Plaintiffs,

LARRY E. CLARK,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

STATE OF LOUISIANA, on behalf of Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development; CHARLES E. SOILEAU; BERTRAND &
SOILEAU; FRANK DENTON; MIKE FOSTER; CADDO PARISH COMMISSION; POLICE JURY OF CADDO PARISH; MANGHAM & DAVIS; WILLIAM SUSSMAN,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 98-CV-1753

- - - - - - - - - -

June 11, 1999

Before DAVIS, DUHÉ, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: 1

Pro se litigant Larry Clark requests this court’s permission

to appeal in forma pauperis in this case, which was recently

removed from state court. This court lacks appellate jurisdiction

because the record shows that no federal judgment has been entered

in the case. 28 U.S.C. §§ 1291, 1292.“If up on the hearing of any interlocutory motion . . . it

shall appear to the Court that the appeal is frivolous and entirely

without merit, the appeal will be dismissed.” 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2.

As no judgment appealable to this court has been entered in

this case, we conclude that the appeal lacks arguable legal merit.

Clark’s motion to proceed IFP on appeal is DENIED and the appeal is

DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS. 5 T H C IR

. R. 42.2. We caution Clark that

any additional appeals filed by him or on his behalf will invite

the imposition of sanctions. To avoid sanctions, Clark should

review any pending appeals to ensure that they do not raise

arguments that are frivolous.

MOTION FOR IFP DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS; SANCTION

WARNING ISSUED.
§ 52.153 Relationship to other subparts. ( a ) A nuclear power reactor manufactured under a manufacturing license issued under this subpart may only be transported to and installed at a site for which either a construction permit under part 50 of this chapter or a combined license under subpart C of this part has been issued.
( b ) Subpart B of this part governs the certification by rulemaking of the design of standard nuclear power facilities. Subpart E of this part governs the NRC staff review and approval of standard designs for a nuclear power facility. A manufacturing license applicant may reference a standard design certification or a standard design approval in its application. These subparts may also be used independently of the provisions in this subpart.
#### Disciplinary Counsel *v.*Johnson.

[Cite as *Disciplinary Counsel v. Johnson,*116 Ohio St.3d 1208, 2007-Ohio-7184.]

(No. 2006-1197

Submitted December 12, 2007

Decided December 19, 2007.)

{¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by respondent, Bryan Bright Johnson, Attorney Registration No. 0003981, last known business address in Columbus, Ohio.

{¶ 2} The court now considers its order of May 16, 2007, wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), suspended respondent for a period of one year with the last six months stayed and ordered that upon reinstatement, respondent shall serve a six-month monitored probation, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A). Therefore,

{¶ 3} It is ordered that respondent is reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio. It is further ordered that the final six months of respondent’s suspension is stayed and that he is placed on probation for a period of six months in accordance with Gov.Bar R. V(9). Consistent with the opinion rendered in this matter, it is ordered that during the period of probation, respondent shall advise any probate court in which he practices that he has been disciplined for excessive fee applications. It is further ordered that if respondent fails to comply with this condition, the stay will be lifted, and respondent will serve the entire term of the actual suspension.

{¶ 4} It is further ordered that on or before thirty days from the date of this order, relator, Disciplinary Counsel, shall file with the Clerk of this court the name of the attorney who will serve as respondent’s monitor, in accordance with Gov.Bar R. V(9). It is further ordered that at the end of respondent’s probationary period, the relator shall file with the Clerk of this court a report indicating whether respondent, during his probationary period, complied with the terms of the probation.

{¶ 5} It is further ordered that on or after six months from the date of this order, respondent may apply for termination of probation as provided in Gov.Bar R. V(9). It is further ordered that respondent’s probation shall not be terminated until (1) respondent files an application for termination of probation in compliance with Gov.Bar R. V(9)(D), (2) respondent complies with this and all *1209other orders issued by this court, (3) respondent complies with the Rules for the Government of the Bar of Ohio, (4) relator files with the Clerk of this court a report indicating that respondent has complied with the terms of the probation, and (5) this court orders that the probation be terminated.

{¶ 6} It is further ordered that the Clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication.

{¶ 7} For earlier case, see *Disciplinary Counsel v. Johnson,*113 Ohio St.3d 344, 2007-Ohio-2074, 865 N.E.2d 873.

Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.
§ 719.43 What is the treatment of travel costs? ( a ) Travel and related expenses must at a minimum comply with the restrictions set forth in 48 CFR 31.205-46, or 48 CFR (DEAR) 970.3102-05-46, as appropriate, to be reimbursable.
( b ) Travel time may be allowed at a full hourly rate for the portion of time during which retained legal counsel performs legal work for which it was retained; any remaining travel time shall be reimbursed at 50 percent of the full hourly rate, except that in no event will travel time spent working for other clients be allowable. Also, for long distance travel that could be completed by various methods of transportation, e.g., car, train, or plane, costs charged by retained legal counsel or any agent of retained legal counsel will be considered reasonable only if the individuals charge no more travel time than it would take to utilize the fastest mode of transportation that is cost-effective. For example, if retained legal counsel travels for 10 hours by train when a cost-effective flight that would take two hours to get to the same destination is available, the attorney may charge a maximum of two hours for the time spent traveling.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                             639
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,417
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      2,007
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                12,474
<PP&E>                                             914
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  13,720
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,346
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           679
<OTHER-SE>                                     174,433
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    13,720
<SALES>                                         45,600
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                45,600
<CGS>                                           42,176
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,961
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 258
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,795)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,795)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,795)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.04)


</TABLE>
§ 60.22 Filing and distribution of application. ( a ) An application for a construction authorization for a high-level radioactive waste repository at a geologic repository operations area, and an application for a license to receive and possess source, special nuclear, or byproduct material at a geologic repository operations area at a site which has been characterized, and any amendments thereto, and an accompanying environmental impact statement and any supplements, shall be signed by the Secretary of Energy or the Secretary's authorized representative and must be filed with the Director.
( b ) DOE shall maintain the capability to generate additional copies for distribution in accordance with written instructions from the Director or the Director's designee.
( c ) DOE shall, upon notification of the appointment of an Atomic Safety and Licensing Board, update the application, eliminating all superseded information, and supplement the environmental impact statement if necessary, and serve the updated application and environmental impact statement (as it may have been supplemented) as directed by the Board. At that time DOE shall also serve one such copy of the application and environmental impact statement on the Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Panel. Any subsequent amendments to the application or supplements to the environmental impact statement shall be served in the same manner.
( d ) At the time of filing of an application and any amendments thereto, one copy shall be made available in an appropriate location near the proposed geologic repository operations area (which shall be a public document room, if one has been established) for inspection by the public and updated as amendments to the application are made. The environmental impact statement and any supplements thereto shall be made available in the same manner. An updated copy of the application, and the environmental impact statement and supplements, shall be produced at any public hearing held by the Commission on the application, for use by any party to the proceeding.
( e ) The DOE shall certify that the updated copies of the application, and the environmental impact statement as it may have been supplemented, as referred to in paragraphs (c) and (d) of this section, contain the current contents of such documents submitted in accordance with the requirements of this part.
[54 FR 27871, July 3, 1989, as amended at 68 FR 58814, Oct. 10, 2003; 69 FR 2279, Jan. 14, 2004]
52.247-48 F.o.b. Destination-Evidence of

Shipment.

As prescribed in 47.305-4(c), insert the following clause:

F.o.b. Destination-Evidence of Shipment (Feb 1999)

(a) If this contract is awarded on a free on board (f.o.b.) destination basis, the Contractor-

(1) Shall not submit an invoice for payment until the supplies covered by the invoice have been

shipped to the destination; and

(2) Shall retain, and make available to the Government for review as necessary, the following

evidence of shipment documentation for a period of 3 years after final payment under the contract:

(i) If transportation is accomplished by common carrier, a signed copy of the commercial bill of

lading for the supplies covered by the Contractor’s invoice, indicating the carrier’s intent to ship the

supplies to the destination specified in the contract.

(ii) If transportation is accomplished by parcel post, a copy of the certificate of mailing.

(iii) If transportation is accomplished by other than common carrier or parcel post, a copy of the

delivery document showing receipt at the destination specified in the contract.

(b) The Contractor is not required to submit evidence of shipment documentation with its invoice.

(End of clause)

Parent topic: 52.247 [Reserved]
# 22.7404 Waiver.

(c) Requests for waivers shall be submitted to the Agency Labor Advisor.

**Parent topic:**SUBPART 22.74 – RESTRICTIONS ON THE USE OF MANDATORY ARBITRATION AGREEMENTS
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 246 (Thursday, December 23, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 80836-80837]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-32011]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT

[Docket No. FR-5375-N-50]


Federal Property Suitable as Facilities To Assist the Homeless

AGENCY: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Community Planning and 
Development, HUD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This Notice identifies unutilized, underutilized, excess, and 
surplus Federal property reviewed by HUD for suitability for possible 
use to assist the homeless.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Juanita Perry, Department of Housing 
and Urban Development, 451 Seventh Street, SW., Room 7262, Washington, 
DC 20410; telephone (202) 708-1234; TTY number for the hearing- and 
speech-impaired (202) 708-2565, (these telephone numbers are not toll-
free), or call the toll-free Title V information line at 800-927-7588.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with the December 12, 1988 
court order in National Coalition for the Homeless v. Veterans 
Administration, No. 88-2503-OG (D.D.C.), HUD publishes a Notice, on a 
weekly basis, identifying unutilized, underutilized, excess and surplus 
Federal buildings and real property that HUD has reviewed for 
suitability for use to assist the homeless. Today's Notice is for the

[[Page 80837]]

purpose of announcing that no additional properties have been 
determined suitable or unsuitable this week.

    Dated: December 16, 2010.
Mark R. Johnston,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Special Needs.
[FR Doc. 2010-32011 Filed 12-22-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210-67-P
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 242 (Friday, December 17, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 78997]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-31785]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/Health Resources and 
Services Administration (CDC/HRSA) Advisory Committee on HIV and STD 
Prevention and Treatment: Notice of Charter Renewal

    This gives notice under the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 
92-463) of October 6, 1972, that the CDC/HRSA Advisory Committee on HIV 
and STD Prevention and Treatment, Department of Health and Human 
Services, has been renewed for a 2-year period through November 25, 
2012.
    Contact Person for More Information: Kevin Fenton, M.D., PhD, 
Designated Federal Officer, CDC/HRSA Advisory Committee on HIV and STD 
Prevention and Treatment, Department of Health and Human Services, CDC, 
1600 Clifton Road, NE., Mailstop E07, Atlanta, Georgia 30333, telephone 
(404)639-8000 or fax (404)639-8600.
    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been 
delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices pertaining to 
announcements of meetings and other committee management activities, 
for both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Agency 
for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.

    Dated: December 13, 2010.
Elaine L. Baker,
Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2010-31785 Filed 12-16-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
§ 452.3 Solicitations. The reverse auction process commences with the issuance of a solicitation by DOE. DOE will publish a solicitation in the Federal Register and shall post the solicitation on its website at *www.eere.energy.gov* no later than 60 days before the bidding in a reverse auction under this part commences. The solicitation shall: ( a ) Invite interested persons and businesses to submit pre-qualification statements;
( b ) Set forth the terms on which bids will be accepted;
( c ) Specify the open window for bidding; and
( d ) Specify the date by which successful bidders will be required to file pre-auction eligibility submissions.
###### Editorial Note on Part 72

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 72 appear at 80 FR 74981, Dec. 1, 2015, and at 81 FR 86910, Dec. 2, 2016.

#### § 72.216 [Reserved]
223 So.2d 408

#### Dr. Cecil O. LORIO et al. v. AETNA INSURANCE COMPANY.

No. 49869.

June 13, 1969.

In re: Dr. Cecil O. Lorio applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of East Baton Rouge. 220 So.2d 781.

It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be notified.
#### § 71.135 Quality assurance records.

The licensee, certificate holder, and applicant for a Certificate of Compliance shall maintain sufficient written records to describe the activities affecting quality. These records must include changes to the quality assurance program as required by § 71.106, the instructions, procedures, and drawings required by § 71.111 to prescribe quality assurance activities, and closely related specifications such as required qualifications of personnel, procedures, and equipment. The records must include the instructions or procedures that establish a records retention program that is consistent with applicable regulations and designates factors such as duration, location, and assigned responsibility. The licensee, certificate holder, and applicant for a Certificate of Compliance shall retain these records for 3 years beyond the date when the licensee, certificate holder, and applicant for a Certificate of Compliance last engage in the activity for which the quality assurance program was developed. If any portion of the quality assurance program, written procedures or instructions is superseded, the licensee, certificate holder, and applicant for a Certificate of Compliance shall retain the superseded material for 3 years after it is superseded.

[80 FR 34014, June 12, 2015]
§ 74.8 Information collection requirements: OMB approval. ( a ) The Commission has submitted the information collection requirements contained in this part to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for approval as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 *et seq.*). The NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. OMB has approved the information collection requirements contained in this part under control number 3150-0123.
( b ) The approved information collection requirements contained in this part appear in §§ 74.7, 74.11, 74.13, 74.15, 74.17, 74.19, 74.31, 74.33, 74.41, 74.43, 74.45, 74.51, 74.57, and 74.59.
( c ) This part contains information collection requirements in addition to those approved under the control number specified in paragraph (a) of this section. These information collection requirements and the control numbers under which they are approved are as follows: ( 1 ) In § 74.15, DOE/NRC Form-741 is approved under Control No. 3150-0003.
( 2 ) In § 74.13, DOE/NRC Form-742 is approved under Control No. 3150-0004.
( 3 ) In § 74.13, DOE/NRC Form-742C is approved under Control No. 3150-0058.
( 4 ) In § 74.17, NRC Form 327 is approved under Control No. 3150-0139.
[50 FR 7579, Feb. 25, 1985, as amended at 52 FR 10040, Mar. 30, 1987; 52 FR 19305, May 22, 1987; 56 FR 55998, Oct. 31, 1991; 62 FR 52189, Oct. 6, 1997; 67 FR 78144, Dec. 23, 2002; 85 FR 65664, Oct. 16, 2020]
Editorial Note on Part 725
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 725 appear at 88 FR 41292, June 26, 2023.

§ 725.21 Issuance. ( a ) Upon a determination that an application meets the requirements of this regulation, the Director, Office of Environment, Health, Safety and Security will issue to the applicant an access permit on Form DOE 379.
( b ) An Access Permit is not an access authorization. It does not authorize any individual not having an appropriate DOE access authorization to receive Restricted Data. See § 725.24 and part 1016 of this title.
[41 FR 56778, Dec. 30, 1976, as amended at 71 FR 68732, Nov. 28, 2006; 88 FR 41292, June 26, 2023]