alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
-       - Superintendent of Documents
      - 2022-04-13T08:16:33-0400
      - Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20401
      - Government Publishing Office
      - Government Publishing Office attests that this document has not been altered since it was disseminated by Government Publishing Office
CASE ANNOUNCEMENTS

*December 10, 2007*

[Cite as *12/10/2007 Case Announcements,*2007-Ohio-6531.]

RECONSIDERATION OF PRIOR DECISIONS

2007-1929.

#### Banez v. Banez.

Stark App. No. 2006CA00216, 2007-Ohio-4584. Reported at 116 Ohio St.3d 1416, 2007-Ohio-6257, 876 N.E.2d 1244. On motion for reconsideration of the dismissal of the cross-appeal. Motion denied.
EPA Reg. No. 241-256 

Vol. 1
§ 71.70 Incorporations by reference. ( a ) The materials listed in this section are incorporated by reference in the corresponding sections noted and made a part of the regulations in part 71. These incorporations by reference were approved by the Director of the Federal Register under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. These materials are incorporated as they exist on the date of the approval. A notice of any changes made to the material incorporated by reference will be published in the Federal Register, and the material must be available to the public. The materials can be examined, by appointment, at the NRC's Technical Library, which is located at Two White Flint North, 11545 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852; telephone: 301-415-7000; email: *Library.Resource@nrc.gov .* The materials are also available from the sources listed below. All approved material is available for inspection at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 1-202-741-6030 or go to *http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html .*
( b ) International Organization for Standardization, ISO Central Secretariat, Chemin de Blandonnet 8 CP 401, 1214 Vernier, Geneva, Switzerland; email: *central@iso.org ;* phone: + 41 22 749 01 11; Web site: *http://www.iso.org .* ( 1 ) ISO 9978:1992(E), “Radiation protection—Sealed radioactive sources—Leakage test methods,” First Edition (February 15, 1992), incorporation by reference approved for § 71.75(a), is available for purchase from the American National Standards Institute, 25 West 43rd Street, 4th Floor, New York, NY 10036, 212-642-4900, *http://www.ansi.org ,* or *info@ansi.org .*
( 2 ) ISO 2919:1999(E), “Radiation protection—Sealed radioactive sources—General requirements and classification,” Second Edition (February 15, 1999), incorporation by reference approved for § 71.75(d), is available on *http://www.amazon.com .*
[80 FR 34013, June 12, 2015, as amended at 80 FR 48684, Aug. 14, 2015]
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certification.

  I, Brian Baker, certify that:

  1.I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D
    required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form
    10-K of the J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Trust 2013-C10
    (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

  2.Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
    whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
    to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
    light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
    misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

  3.Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
    information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
    covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

  4.Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required
    in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
    disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have
    fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all
    material respects; and

  5.All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
    asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment
    of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required
    to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB
    and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to
    this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material
    instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in
    this report on Form 10-K.

  In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
  provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:

  Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, as Master
  Servicer, CWCapital Asset Management LLC, as Special Servicer, Wells Fargo
  Bank, National Association, as Trustee and Certificate Administrator, Wells
  Fargo Bank, National Association, as Custodian, Park Bridge Lender Services
  LLC, as Senior Trust Advisor, Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank,
  National Association, as Primary Servicer for the West County Center Mortgage
  Loan, Rialto Capital Advisors LLC, as Special Servicer for the West County
  Center Mortgage Loan, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee and
  Certificate Administrator for the West County Center Mortgage Loan, Wells
  Fargo Bank, National Association, as Custodian for the West County Center
  Mortgage Loan, and Pentalpha Surveillance LLC, as Senior Trust Advisor for the
  West County Center Mortgage Loan.



    Dated:   March 28, 2014


    /s/ Brian Baker
    Signature

    President and Chief Executive Officer
    (senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
Editorial Note on Part 9
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 9 appear at 82 FR 52825, Nov. 15, 2017.

§ 9.55 Specification of records. ( a ) ( 1 ) Requests relating to records shall, insofar as practicable, specify the nature of the record sought, the approximate dates covered by the record, the system of records in which the record is thought to be included and the system manager having custody of the record system as shown in the annual compilation, “Notices of Records Systems”, published by the General Services Administration. Requests shall, in addition, comply with any additional specification requirements contained in the published “Notice of System of Records” for that system.
( 2 ) Requests for correction or amendment of records shall, in addition, specify the particular record involved, state the nature of the correction or amendment sought and furnish justification for the correction or amendment.
( b ) Requests which do not contain information sufficient to identify the record requested will be returned promptly to the requestor, with a notice indicating what information is lacking. Individuals making requests in person will be informed of any deficiency in the specification of records at the time the request is made. Individuals making requests in writing will be notified of any such deficiency when their request is acknowledged.
§ 490.806 Action on an application for waiver. ( a ) DOE grants or denies a complete waiver application within 45 business days after receipt of a complete application.
( b ) If DOE determines that an application is not complete in that sufficient information is not provided for DOE to make a determination, DOE notifies the State or covered person of the information that must be submitted to complete the application.
( c ) If DOE denies a waiver, and the State or covered person wishes to exhaust administrative remedies, the State or covered person must appeal within 30 days of the date of the determination, pursuant to 10 CFR part 1003, subpart C, to the Office of Hearings and Appeals, U.S. Department of Energy, 1000 Independence Ave., SW., Washington, DC 20585. DOE's determination shall be stayed during the pendency of an appeal under this paragraph.
# L_2023227EN.01004101.xml

| 14.9.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 227/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.9.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 227/41

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE No 173/2020

of 23 October 2020

amending Protocol 31 to the EEA Agreement, on cooperation in specific fields outside the four freedoms [2023/1748]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (“the EEA Agreement”), and in particular Articles 86 and 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | It is appropriate to continue the cooperation of the Contracting Parties to the EEA Agreement in Union actions funded from the general budget of the Union regarding the implementation and development of the single market for financial services. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

It is appropriate to continue the cooperation of the Contracting Parties to the EEA Agreement in Union actions funded from the general budget of the Union regarding the implementation and development of the single market for financial services.

| (2) | Protocol 31 to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended in order to allow for that extended cooperation to take place from 1 January 2020, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Protocol 31 to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended in order to allow for that extended cooperation to take place from 1 January 2020,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

In paragraph 11 of Article 7 of Protocol 31 to the EEA Agreement, the words “and 2019” are replaced by the words “, 2019 and 2020”.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the day following the last notification under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement (*1).

It shall apply from 1 January 2020.

Article 3

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 23 October 2020.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Sabine MONAUNI

---

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
#### Wood *et al. v.*Moore *et al.*

*Bill in Fqiiity by Creditor to set aside Conveyances as Fraudulent.*

1. *Conveyance by insolvent debtor; validity as against other creditors.*A conveyance of property by an insolvent debtor’ to one of his children will be sustained, against the attack of existing creditors, on proof that he was indebted to the grantee in an amount at least equal to the value of the property, that the conveyance was made and received in absolute payment of that debt, and without the reservation of any interest or benefit whatever to the debtor himself.

Appeal from Marengo Chancery Court.

Heard before Hon. Thos. W. Coleman.

Taylor & Johnston, for appellants.

Jno. C. Anderson, *contra.*

SOMEBVTLLE, J.

We concur with the chancellor in the conclusion reached by him in this case, being satisfied from the testimony that the defendant, Henry Moore, the alleged fraudulent grantor in the several conveyances assailed in the bill, was indebted to the grantees, Virgil and Susan Moore, in an amount at least equal to the value of the lands conveyed to them; that the conveyances were made in absolute payment of the debt, without reservation of interest by the grantor, and the preference was, therefore, one authorized by law. *Hodges v. Coleman,*76 Ala. 103; *Meyer v. Sulzbacher,*76 Ala. 120; *Levy v. Williams,*79 Ala. 171; *Carter v. Coleman,*82 Ala. 177, The conveyances are, for these reasons, valid against the attack of the complainants' who were pre-existing creditors.

The deed to Bradford, made by Virgil Moore, embraces a part of the same land, and must necessarily be sustained, in view of the conclusion above attained.

Affirmed.
T HE U NITED B UI LDING

, 77 W EST W ACKER D RIVE

, C HICAGO

, IL 60601

D AN W EISS

M ANAGING D IRECTOR

, I NTERNATIONAL A FFAIRS & R EGULATORY ( 3 12 ) 997

-

7573

DAN

. WEISS @ COAIR

. COM

March 23, 2012

Esta Rosenberg, Chief

U.S. Carrier Licensing Division

U.S. Depa rtment of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E.

Washington, D.C. 20590

Re: Notice of United

Docket DOT

- OST

- 2010

- 0092

Dear Ms. Rosenberg:

Pursuant to the blanket statement of authorization granted to United and Aeromar by De partment

Approval dated April 11, 2011 in th is docket, 1 United notifies the Department of the display of

United’s “UA*” designator code on flights operated by Aeromar between Mexico City

Minatitlán. The proposed code

- share services are fully consistent wi th the U.S.

- Mexico Air

Services Agreement. United and Aeromar intend to implement these services no sooner than

thirty days from today.

Sincerely,

Dan Weiss

Managing Director, International & Regulatory

Affairs

UNITED AIR LINES, INC.

cc: Robert Finamore

1 By Department Action dated April 11, 2011, the Department conformed its original approval of the

Continental/Aeromar code share in this d ocke t with Order 2011

- 3

- 14 to allow Aeromar to display the

designator codes of “United and/or Continental”.T HE U NITED B UI LDING

, 77 W EST W ACKER D RIVE

, C HICAGO

, IL 60601 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that I have this date served a copy of the foregoing document on all

persons named below by causing a copy to be sent via email:

ago erlich@ggh

- airlaw.com

amosner@hklaw.com

anbird@fedex.com

barbara.russell@virginamerica.com

b enjamin.slocum@usairways.com

bill@mietuslaw.com

carl.nelson@aa.com

dkirstein@y klaw.com

efaberman@wileyrein.com

howard.kass@usairways.com

jblank@prestongates.com

jeff.morgan@delta.com

jhill@dowlohnes.com

jyoung@yklaw.com john.fredericksen@suncountry.com

jrichardson@johnlrichardson .com

matwood@sherblackwell.com

m l benge@zsr.law.com

msinick@ssd.com

pmurphy@lopmurphy.com

robertland@jetblue.com

rsilverberg@sgbdc.com

sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com

slachter@lachter

- clements.com

temerson@skywest.com

william.stallings @usdoj.gov

dwight.moore@ustranscom.mil

john.allen @faa.gov

Annalei Avanceña

Int ernational Regulatory A dvisor

March 23, 2012
Click here to skip navigation

OPM.gov HomeSubject IndexImportant LinksContact UsHelp

# U.S. Office of Personnel Management - Ensuring the Federal Government has an effective civilian workforce

Advanced Search

## Training and Development Policy
# EPA Reg. No. 241-256

Vol. 1
| (logo) plante moran | **Plante & Moran, PLLC**

10 South Riverside Plaza

9th floor

Chicago, IL 60606

Tel: 312.207.1040

Fax: 312.207.1066

plantemoran.com |
|---------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

Report of IndependentRegistered Public Accounting Firm

 

 

To the Board of Directors

National Tax Search, LLC

 

We have examined National TaxSearch, LLC’s (the “Company”) compliance with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB Servicing Criteria, set forth inItem 1122(d) of the Security and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB forthe National Tax Search TaxQ system (the “Platform”) as of and forthe year ended December 31, 2016. The Company has determined that only certainservicing criteria, 1122(d)(l)(ii), 1122(d)1(iv), 1122(d)2(ii), 1122(d)2(v),1122(d)2(vi), 1122(d)(4)(xi), and 1122(d)(4)(xii), are applicable to theactivities performed by it with respect to the Platform covered by this report.The Company has determined that the remaining servicing criteria set forth inItem 1122(d) of the SEC Regulation AB are not applicable to the activities performedby it with respect to the Platform covered by this report.

 

Management is responsible forthe Company's compliance with those servicing criteria. Our responsibility isto express an opinion on management's assertion about the Company's compliance withthe servicing criteria based on our examination. Our examination was conductedin accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board(United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidenceabout the Company's compliance with the applicable servicing criteria andperforming such other procedures as we considered necessary in thecircumstances. Our examination included a selection of a sample of transactionsand compliance activities related to the Platform during the examination periodand determining whether the Company processed those transactions and performedthose activities in compliance with the servicing criteria. Our testing ofselected transactions and compliance activities was limited to calculations,reports, and activities performed by the Company during the period covered bythis report. Our procedures did not include determining whether errors may haveoccurred prior to our tests that may have affected the balances or amountscalculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this reportfor the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe that ourexamination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination doesnot provide a legal determination on the Company’s compliance with theservicing criteria.

 

In our opinion,management’s assertion that the Company complied with the aforementionedservicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016 for thePlatform is fairly stated in all material respects.

 

 

/s/ Plante & Moran, PLLC

 

Chicago, IL

January 27, 2017

 

 

(logo) Praxity 

MEMBER

GLOBAL ALLIANCE OF 

INDEPENDENT FIRMS
EXHIBIT 32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 (AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sionix Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, James R. Currier, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify to my knowledge and in my capacity as an officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and,


2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.




Date: August 15, 2011


By:
/s/ James R. CurrierJames R. CurrierChairman, Chief Executive Officer, and Principal Executive Officer





A certification furnished pursuant to this Item will not be deemed “filed” for purposes of section 18 of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78r), or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the registrant specifically incorporates it by reference.
EXHIBIT 31.2
  CERTIFICATIONS
 
 
 I, Michael J. Sallmann, Vice President  Finance and Secretary of Criticare Systems, Inc., certify that:
 
 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Criticare Systems, Inc.;
 
 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
 
 4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 
 (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 
 (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
 (c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
 
 5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 
 (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 
 (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
 
 Date: November 13, 2003
 /s/ Michael J. Sallman
 Michael J. Sallmann
 Vice President - Finance and Secretary
#### § 824.14 Special procedures.

A person receiving a final notice of violation under § 824.7 may elect in writing, within 30 days of receipt of such notice, the application of special procedures regarding payment of the penalty set forth in section 234A.c.(3) of the Act, 42 U.S.C. 2282a(c)(3). The Director shall promptly assess a civil penalty, by order, after the date of such election. If the civil penalty has not been paid within sixty calendar days after the assessment has been issued, the DOE shall institute an action in the appropriate District Court of the United States for an order affirming the assessment of the civil penalty.
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T BOBB Y D ARRE LL COLB ER T, P e titio n e r- A p p e lla n t, v. J I M M C DO NA L D, D ef

endant- A pp el l ee . N o. 09- 35537 D . C. N o . 2 : 0 8 - c v - 0 0 8 7 0 - RSL ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f orthe W e s t e rn D i s tr i c tof W a s hi ngt on R obe rtS . L a s ni k, C hi e f D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d J une 29, 2010 ** B efo re: A L A R C Ó N , L E A V Y , an d G R A B E R , C i rcu i tJu d g es. W a s hi ngt on s t a t e pr i s one rB obby D a rr e l l C ol be rtappe a l s pr o s e f r om the di s tr i c tc ourt ’ s j udgm e ntde ny i ng hi s 28 U . S . C . § 2254 habe a s pe t i t i on. W e ha ve j u r i s d i c t i o n u n d e r2 8 U . S. C. § 2 2 5 3 , a n d w e a f f i rm. 

# FI LED JU L 01 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS09- 35537 2 C o l b e rtc o n t e n d s th a tth e tr i a l c o u rt ’ s d e n i a l o f h i s m o t i o n t o s e v e rth e two unr e l a t e d r ape c ha r ge s f ortr i a l de ni e d hi s due pr oc e s s r i ghtt o af a i rtr i a l . W e do n o t r e a c h th e m e r its o f

th is c la im , h o w e v e r , b e c au s e C o lb e rt f a ile d to e x h au s t it in s ta te c o u rt. See 2 8 U .S .C . § 2 2 5 4 ( b ) ( 1 ) ( A ) ; s e e al s o Hi i v ala v . W

ood , 195 F . 3d 10 98 , 11 06 -07 (9th C i r. 19 99 ); B a ldw i n v. R eese , 54 1 U . S . 27 , 32 (200 4). AF F I RME D.