alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CASE ANNOUNCEMENTS

*January 30, 2008*

[Cite as *01/30/2008 Case Announcements,*2008-Ohio-290.]

MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS

2007-2425.

#### State v. Ketterer.

Butler C.P. No. CR 2003-03-0309. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Common Pleas for Butler County. Upon consideration of appellee’s motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction,

It is ordered by the court that the motion to dismiss is denied.

It is further ordered by the court, sua sponte, that the appeal in this case shall be consolidated with the appeal in 2007-1261, *State v. Ketterer,*Butler C.P. No. CR 2003-03-0309. No further briefing shall be allowed.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 of PBF Holding Company LLC (the Company), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Thomas J. Nimbley, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: March 18, 2013



|                             
|-----------------------------
|/s/ Thomas J. Nimbley        
|Thomas J. Nimbley            
|Chief Executive Officer      
|(Principal Executive Officer)

A signed original of the written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to PBF Holding Company LLC and
will be retained by PBF Holding Company LLC and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Jean Kendrick, Appellant, v Mohawk Valley Oil Co. et al., Respondents. Workers’ Compensation Board, Respondent.

Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed February 26, 1979, which disallowed a claim for death benefits under the Workers’ Compensation Law. The board found: "on the basis of the evidence in the record, particularly Dr. Cohen’s testimony, that claimant’s death was not causally related to his work activity on September 17, 1974 and that the death was due to the natural progression of claimant’s underlying heart disease.” The board’s decision is supported by substantial evidence and must be affirmed. Claimant’s other contentions have been examined and found to be without merit. Decision affirmed, without costs. Greenblott, J. P., Main, Mikoll and Casey. JJ., concur; Staley, Jr., J., not •taking part.
| (logo) ncb  National Cooperative Bank    | 2011 Crystal Drive  Suite, 8oo  Arlington, Virginia 22202 |
|-----------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------|

 

February 6, 2018

 

 

Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Securities, Inc. as Depositor

Attn: Anthony Sfarra

375 Park Avenue, 2nd Floor

J0127-023

New York, NY 10152

 

RE: Annual Statement as to Compliance

WFRBS 2013 C12

 

Dear Sir/Madam: 

 

In accordance with the Pooling and Servicing Agreement enteredinto in connection with the issuance of the Commercial Mortgage Pass-ThroughCertificates Series 2013-C12, as an authorized officer of National CooperativeBank, N.A. (the “NCB Master Servicer”), I hereby certify pursuant to Section11.12 thereof that:

 

a. A review of the activities of the NCB Master Servicer duringthe preceding calendar year (the “Reporting Period”) and of its performanceunder the Pooling and Servicing Agreement has been made under my supervision.

 

b. To the best of my knowledge, based on these reviews, the NCBMaster Servicer has fulfilled all obligations under this agreement in allmaterial respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

Please note that the annual financial statement will be sent underseparate cover on or before March 31, 2018.

 

 

Best regards,

/s/ Karyn Mann

Karyn Mann

Senior Vice President, Investor Compliance

National Cooperative Bank, N.A.
### IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 15

- 00259

- CV

IN RE BRENDA COLLINS AND DENNIS EUGENE CO LLINS

Original Proceeding

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relators ’ Petition for Writ of Mandamus filed on July 23, 2015, is denied.

TOM GRAY

Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Petition denied

Opinion delivered and filed July 30 , 2015

OT06
#### SOLINGER, Respondent, v. FEDER et al., Appellants.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

December 24, 1914.)

Action by Bertha Solinger against Louis Feder and others. L. Marshall, of New York City, for appellants. AY. B. Solinger, of New York City, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Order affirmed, with $10 <osts and disbursements. Order filed.

McLAUGHLIN, J., dissents.
J. Pickering is waived and he failed to demonstrate good cause or actual prejudice for failing to raise it on direct appeal. 

### See NRS 34.810(1)(13). Accordingly, we

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED. 2

Saitta

Gibbon's

cc: Chief Judge, The Eighth Judicial District Court Hon. J. Charles Thompson, Senior Judge Anthony Perry Oliver Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

2 We have reviewed all documents that appellant has submitted in pro se to the clerk of this court in this matter, and we conclude that no relief based upon those submissions is warranted. To the extent that appellant has attempted to present claims or facts in those submissions which were not previously presented in the proceedings below, we have declined to consider them in the first instance.

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2
(0) [947A 

### e
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, John Breeman, Chief Financial Officer of Voltari Corporation (the Registrant), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



| | 1. | The Registrants annual report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2013 (the Annual Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |                        
|-------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: April 30, 2014 |  | /s/ John Breeman       
|                     |  | John Breeman           
|                     |  | Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Voltari Corporation and will be
retained by Voltari Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 1710.117 Refunds. ( a ) The Board will refund promptly any amounts deducted to satisfy debts owed to the United States when the debt is waived, found not owed to the United States, or when directed by an administrative or judicial order.
( b ) Unless required or permitted by law or contract, refunds under this section may not bear interest.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-01-00615-CR

George Andre Clark, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 403RD JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 9014039, HONORABLE FRANK W. BRYAN, JR., JUDGE PRESIDING

Appellant’s motion to dismiss this appeal is granted. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a).

The appeal is dismissed.

 

David Puryear, Justice

Before Chief Justice Aboussie, Justices B. A. Smith and Puryear

Dismissed on Appellant’s Motion

Filed: November 29, 2001

Do Not Publish
EXHIBIT 34.2



LOGO

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors

TransCentra, Inc.

We have examined managements assertion for those customers that management has informed us have requested confirmation of compliance,
included in the accompanying Managements Report on Assessment of Compliance with Regulation AB Servicing Criteria (Managements Assertion), that TransCentra, Inc. (the Company) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in
Item 1122(d)(2)(i) and Item1122(d)(4)(iv) of the Securities and Exchange Commissions (SEC) Regulation AB for services by the Company that are encompassed by contractual obligations to perform Regulation AB reporting (the
Platform) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2014. TransCentra has determined that the remainder of the servicing criteria are not applicable to the activities it performs with respect to the Platform covered by this report.
Management is responsible for the Companys compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on managements assertion about the Companys compliance with the applicable servicing criteria
based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards established by the American Institute of
Certified Public Accountants, as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Companys compliance with the applicable servicing criteria,
including tests on a sample basis of the servicing activities related to the Platform, determining whether the Company performed those activities in compliance with the servicing criteria during the specified period and performing such other
procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our procedures were limited to selected servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report and, accordingly, such samples may not have included servicing
activities related to each asset-backed transaction in the Platform. Further, an examination is not designed to detect noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurred prior to the period specified above that may have affected the balances
or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Companys
compliance with the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, managements assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned
applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2014, is fairly stated, in all material respects.

/s/ Porter
Keadle Moore, LLC

January 30, 2015

235 Peachtree Street NE | Suite 1800| Atlanta, Georgia 30303 | Phone 404-588-4200 | Fax 404-588-4222
N OTE : This order is nonprecedential. 

# United States Court of Appeals **for the Federal Circuit**

__________________________

RICHARD REBSTOCK, Claimant-Appellant,

v. ERIC K. SHINSEKI, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, Respondent-Appellee.

__________________________ 2012-7169

__________________________ Appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims in 12-1171, Judge Robert N. Davis.

__________________________ ON MOTION

__________________________ O R D E R Richard Rebstock moves for an out of time extension to file his reply brief. The Government does not oppose the motion. Upon consideration thereof, IT IS ORDERED THAT: Case: 12-7169 Document: 24 Page: 1 Filed: 12/27/2012RICHARD REBSTOCK v. SHINSEKI 2 Rebstock’s motion is grante d. The reply brief is accepted as filed. F OR T HE C OURT /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly Clerk

s23 Case: 12-7169 Document: 24 Page: 2 Filed: 12/27/2012
**Exhibit 32.1**

**Certification of Chief Executive Officer Under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

The undersigned officer of First National Lincoln Corporation (the "Company") hereby certifies that the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005 to which this certification is being furnished as an exhibit (the "Report"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. This certification is provided pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K ("Item 601(b)(32)") promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"), and the Exchange Act. In accordance with clause (ii) of Item 601(b)(32), thiscertification (A) shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and (B) shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.

 

Date: August 9, 2005

 

/s/ Daniel R. Daigneault

Daniel R. Daigneault

President & Chief Executive Officer

First National Lincoln Corporation
#### MORRON v. BRYCE et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

May 19, 1914.)

Action by John R. Morron against Edith Cooper Bryce and others.

PER CURIAM.

Motion granted. See, also, 147 N. Y. Supp. 931.

JENKS, P. J., takes no part.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED October 31, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-40871 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus ISABEL RUANO, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:04-CR-238-1

-------------------- Before JOLLY, DAVIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Isabel Ruano appeals from the sentence imposed following her guilty plea to transporting illegal aliens for commercial gain. She argues that she was sentenced in contravention to United States v. Booker , 125 S. Ct. 738 (2005), when her sentence was enhanced pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2L1.1(5) (2003) and by virtue of the fact that she was sentenced pursuant to the mandatory Sentencing Guidelines regime.No. 04-40871 -2- The district court, however, opined that if the Guidelines were held unconstitutional, it would impose the same sentence. Therefore, the Government has carried its burden of establishing that the sentencing errors suffered by Ruano were harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. United States v. Walters , 418 F.3d 461, 464 (5th Cir. 2005); United States v. Akpan , 407 F.3d 360, 376 (5th Cir. 2005).
AFFIRMED.
IV 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 603 

Recognizing November 25, 2017, as ‘‘Small Business Saturday’’ and supporting efforts to increase awareness of the value of locally owned small 

businesses. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 2, 2017 

Mr. CHABOT (for himself, Ms. VELA ́ZQUEZ, Ms. ADAMS, Mr. BACON, Mr. 

BLUM, Mr. BRAT, Ms. JUDY CHU of California, Ms. CLARKE of New 

York, Mr. COMER, Mr. ESPAILLAT, Mr. EVANS, Mr. FITZPATRICK, Miss 

GONZA ́LEZ-COLO ́N of Puerto Rico, Mr. KELLY of Mississippi, Mr. KING

of Iowa, Mr. KNIGHT, Mr. LAWSON of Florida, Mr. LUETKEMEYER, Mr. 

MARSHALL, Mrs. MURPHY of Florida, Mr. NORMAN, Mrs. RADEWAGEN, 

Mr. SCHNEIDER, Ms. BONAMICI, Mr. CARSON of Indiana, Mr. DELANEY, 

Ms. HANABUSA, Ms. KELLY of Illinois, Ms. MCCOLLUM, Mr. TAKANO, 

Ms. SLAUGHTER, and Mr. SWALWELL of California) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Small Business 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing November 25, 2017, as ‘‘Small Business Saturday’’ and supporting efforts to increase awareness of 

the value of locally owned small businesses. 

Whereas there are over 29,600,000 small businesses in the 

United States; 

Whereas small businesses represent 99.9 percent of all businesses with employees in the United States; 


dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 603 IH 

Whereas small businesses employ nearly 48 percent of the 

employees in the private sector in the United States; 

Whereas small businesses pay 41.1 percent of the total payroll of the employees in the private sector in the United 

States; 

Whereas small businesses constitute nearly 98 percent of 

firms exporting goods; 

Whereas small businesses generated 1,400,000 net new jobs; 

and 

Whereas November 25, 2017, is an appropriate day to designate as ‘‘Small Business Saturday’’: Now, therefore, be 

it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) recognizes and encourages the observance of 

3 ‘‘Small Business Saturday’’; and 

4 (2) supports efforts— 

5 (A) to encourage consumers to shop lo6 cally; and 

7 (B) to increase awareness of the value of 

8 locally owned small businesses and the impact 

9 of locally owned small businesses on the econ10 omy of the United States. 

Æ 


dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
PGI 239.7603-4 DoD damage assessment

activities.

(a) Prior to initiating damage assessment activities, the contracting officer shall verify that a

contract(s) identified in the cyber incident report include(s) the clause at DFARS 252.239-7010. If

the contracting officer determines that a contract identified in the report does not contain the

clause, the contracting officer shall notify the requiring activity that damage assessment activities, if

required, may be determined to constitute a change to the contract.

(b) In cases of cyber incidents involving multiple contracts, a single contracting officer will be

designated to coordinate with the contractor regarding media submission.

(c) If the requiring activity requests the contracting officer obtain media, as defined at DFARS

252.239-7010, from the contractor, the contracting officer shall—

(1) Provide a written request for the media;

(2) Provide the contractor with the “Instructions for Media Submission” document available at

http://www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/dars/pgi/docs/Instructions_for_Submitting_M...; and

(3) Provide a copy of the request to DC3, electronically via email at dcise@dc3.mil, and the requiring

activity.

(d) If the contracting officer is notified by the requiring activity that media are not required, the

contracting officer shall notify the contractor and simultaneously provide a copy of the notice to DC3

and the requiring activity.

(e) The contracting officer shall document the action taken as required by paragraph (c) or (d) of this

section, in the contract file.

(f) Upon receipt of the contractor media, DC3 will confirm receipt in writing to the contractor and

the requesting contracting officer.

(g) When the requiring activity determines that the damage assessment activities are complete, the

requiring activity will provide the contracting officer with a report documenting the findings from

the damage assessment activities affecting covered defense information.

(h) The contracting officer shall include the report documenting the findings in the contract file(s)

and provide a copy to the contractor.

Parent topic: PGI 239.7603 Procedures.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                            1581
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       93
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  1676
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    1676
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              249
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                        1427
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      1676
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   224
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       25
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    95
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 104
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  (246)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (246)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (8.19)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (8.19)
        

</TABLE>
IV 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 543 

Congratulating Northeastern Illinois University on the sesquicentennial of 

the University. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 27, 2017 

Mr. QUIGLEY submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Education and the Workforce 

RESOLUTION 

Congratulating Northeastern Illinois University on the 

sesquicentennial of the University. 

Whereas Northeastern Illinois University has served the 

Chicagoland area and beyond for 150 years, having graduated nearly 80,000 students who have— 

(1) strengthened the local workforce; 

(2) made a positive difference in their communities; 

and 

(3) transformed the lives of others, just as the University has done for those students; 

Whereas Northeastern Illinois University is regarded as the 

most diverse regional university in the Midwest and is 

designated by the Department of Education as a Hispanic-Serving Institution; 

Whereas Northeastern Illinois University is known for— 


dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 543 IH 

(1) having the safest campus in the State of Illinois; 

(2) being among the best institutions in the United 

States for adult learners; and 

(3) the fact that graduates of the University have 

the ninth-lowest amount of student loan debt among 

graduates of 4-year colleges and universities in the 

United States; and 

Whereas Northeastern Illinois University offers more than 80 

undergraduate and graduate programs in the arts, 

sciences, education, and business at 5 locations in the 

Chicago metropolitan area, including in the North Park 

and Bronzeville neighborhoods: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) congratulates Northeastern Illinois Univer3 sity on the sesquicentennial of the University; and 

4 (2) extends best wishes to the University for 

5 continued success and achievement. 

Æ 


dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS