alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 245 (Wednesday, December 22, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 80501]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-32092]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM


Formations of, Acquisitions by, and Mergers of Bank Holding 
Companies

    The companies listed in this notice have applied to the Board for 
approval, pursuant to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 
1841 et seq.) (BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part 225), and all other 
applicable statutes and regulations to become a bank holding company 
and/or to acquire the assets or the ownership of, control of, or the 
power to vote shares of a bank or bank holding company and all of the 
banks and nonbanking companies owned by the bank holding company, 
including the companies listed below.
    The applications listed below, as well as other related filings 
required by the Board, are available for immediate inspection at the 
Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The application also will be available 
for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested 
persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated 
in the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the proposal also involves the 
acquisition of a nonbanking company, the review also includes whether 
the acquisition of the nonbanking company complies with the standards 
in section 4 of the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise noted, 
nonbanking activities will be conducted throughout the United States.
    Unless otherwise noted, comments regarding each of these 
applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the 
offices of the Board of Governors not later than January 18, 2011.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of New York (Ivan Hurwitz, Vice President) 
33 Liberty Street, New York, New York 10045-0001:
    1. Chuo Mitsui Trust Holding, Inc., Tokyo, Japan; to become a bank 
holding Company by acquiring The Sumitomo Trust and Banking Co., Ltd, 
Osaka, Japan, and thereby acquire Sumitomo Trust and Banking Co. (USA), 
Hoboken, New Jersey.
    In connection with this application, Applicant also has applied to 
acquire Nikko Am Americas Holding Co., Inc., Nikko Asset Management 
Americas, Inc., and Cho Mitsui Investment, all in New York, New York, 
and thereby engage in investment advisory activities, pursuant to 
section 225.24(b)(6) of Regulation Y.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, December 17, 
2010.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2010-32092 Filed 12-21-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
Case 2:06-cv-00767-MEF-SRW Document 12 Filed 09/27/2006 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:06-cv-00767-MEF-SRW Document 12 Filed 09/27/2006 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
           AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      I,  Stephen L.  Brown,  as Chief  Executive  Officer of  Franklin  Capital
Corporation (the "COMPANY") certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

      (1)   the  accompanying  Form 10-Q report for the period ending  September
30,  2003 as  filed  with the  U.S.  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  (the
"REPORT") fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

      (2)   the  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.



Dated:  November 14, 2003                   /s/ Stephen L. Brown
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Stephen L. Brown
                                            Chairman and Chief Executive Officer



A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided  to  Franklin  Capital  Corporation  and will be  retained  by Franklin
Capital  Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange  Commission or
its staff upon request.
ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE



Reference is hereby made to that certain
Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated
as of March 1, 2013, by and among DEUTSCHE MORTGAGE & ASSET RECEIVING
CORPORATION, as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master
Servicer, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Special Servicer, U.S. BANK
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee, and DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS,
as Certificate Administrator, Paying Agent and Custodian, and PARK BRIDGE LENDER
SERVICES LLC as Operating Advisor with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through
Certificates, Series COMM 2013-CCRE6 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms
used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.



Pursuant to Section 10.11 of this Agreement,
I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period
from January 1, 2013 through December 31, 2013 (the "Reporting Period"),  and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has been
made under my supervision, and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review,
the Master Servicer, has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------







IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has
executed this Certificate as of the 13th day of March 2014.



| |  | 
| |  | 



|Daniel Bober             | 
|------------------------ | 
|Executive Vice President | 
|Wells Fargo Bank         | 





















|Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | 
|---------------------- |
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Somsak Chivavibul,
certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period
covered by this report on Form 10-K of SLM Student Loan Trust 2013-1 (the Exchange Act periodic reports);

2. Based on my
knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing
and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required under this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer and administrator have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreement and administration agreement, as applicable, in all material respects; and

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this
report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K. In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as indenture trustee.

Date: March 27, 2014



|                                                                     
|---------------------------------------------------------------------
|/S/ SOMSAK CHIVAVIBUL                                                
|Somsak Chivavibul                                                    
|President and Chief Financial Officer (Senior Securitization Officer)
|SLM Funding LLC
#### § 603.505 Program resources.

Program officials can be a source of information for determining the reasonableness of proposed funding (e.g., on labor rates, as discussed in § 603.520) or establishing observable and verifiable technical milestones for payments (see § 603.570).
Order entered August 25, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-01415-CR

TAMARA LAVON CHRISTIAN, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 005-80320-2013

ORDER

The Court REINSTATES the appeal.

On July 25, 2014, we ordered the trial court to make findings regarding why appellant’s 

brief has not been filed. The Court now has before it appellant’s motion to dismiss the appeal. 

Accordingly, we VACATE the July 25, 2014 order requiring findings. We will dispose of the 

motion to dismiss the appeal in due course.

/s/ DAVID EVANS 

JUSTICE
Summary of Influent Concentrations for POTWs 1 through 40 from:

"Fate of Priority Pollutants in Publicly Owned Treatment Works", Final Report, Vol. 1, EPA 1982

Parameter

Average of POTW 

Average 

Concentrations* 

Median of POTW 

Average 

Concentrations*

Flow Weighted Average of 

POTW Average 

Concentrations* 

BOD (mg/L) 214 215 218

TSS (mg/L) 182 153 201

Cadmium 38 3 17

Chromium 173 105 142

Copper 226 132 251

Cyanide 577 249 420

Lead 101 53 119

Mercury (ng/L) 551 517 573

Nickel 120 54 82

Silver 9 8 9

Zinc 723 273 740

Benzene 20 2 18

1,1,1-Trichloroethane 220 29 343

Chloroform 17 7 18

1,2-trans-Dichloroethylene 7 2 4

Ethylbenzene 22 8 32

Methylene Chloride 508 38 246

Tetrachloroethylene 125 23 188

Toluene 216 27 289

Trichloroethylene 76 28 86

Phenol 54 7 70

Naphthalene 7 3 8

Bis (2-ethyl hexyl) Phthalate 45 27 51

Butyl Benzyl Phthalate 12 3 16

Di-N-Butyl Phthalate 9 4 10

Diethyl Phthalate 4 3 3

* All units in ug/L unless othewise noted
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 743 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 743

To repeal the wage rate requirements commonly known as the Davis-Bacon 
                                  Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 30, 2017

Mr. King of Iowa (for himself, Mr. Franks of Arizona, Mr. Sanford, Mr. 
 Harper, Mr. Amash, Mr. Hensarling, Mr. Duncan of South Carolina, and 
    Ms. Jenkins of Kansas) introduced the following bill; which was 
        referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To repeal the wage rate requirements commonly known as the Davis-Bacon 
                                  Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Davis-Bacon Repeal Act''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF DAVIS-BACON WAGE REQUIREMENTS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter IV of chapter 31 of title 40, United 
States Code, is repealed.
    (b) Reference.--Any reference in any law to a wage requirement of 
subchapter IV of chapter 31 of title 40, United States Code, shall 
after the date of the enactment of this Act be null and void.

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE AND LIMITATION.

    The amendment made by section 2 shall take effect 30 days after the 
date of the enactment of this Act but shall not affect any contract in 
existence on such date of enactment or made pursuant to invitation for 
bids outstanding on such date of enactment.
                                 <all>
```
114 STAT. 790 PUBLIC LAW 106–269—SEPT. 22, 2000

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 4608:

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 106–689 (Comm. on Transportation and Infrastructure).

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 146 (2000):

June 27, considered and passed House.

Sept. 13, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 106–269

106th Congress

An Act

To designate the United States courthouse located at 220 West Depot Street in

Greeneville, Tennessee, as the ‘‘James H. Quillen United States Courthouse’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

The United States courthouse located at 220 West Depot Street

in Greeneville, Tennessee, shall be known and designated as the

‘‘James H. Quillen United States Courthouse’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the United States courthouse

referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the

‘‘James H. Quillen United States Courthouse’’.

Approved September 22, 2000.

Sept. 22, 2000

[H.R. 4608]
1443.205 Contract clauses.       BPCs may establish procedures, when appropriate, for authorizing the CO to vary the 30-day period for submission of requests for adjustment prescribed by FAR 43.205.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 1443.2 - Change Orders
Subpart 1242.1—Contract Audit Services

Parent topic: PART 1242—CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION AND AUDIT SERVICES

1242.101 Contract audit responsibilities.

(b) It is DOT policy that private certified public accounting (CPA) firms may be used to provide audit

services as described in FAR 42.101 to DOT contracting officers when procurement schedule

demands cannot be met by the Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) or the agency with audit

cognizance.

1242.102 Assignment of contract audit services.

(b) In accordance with 1242.101, when the responsible audit agency declines a request for services,

DOT contracting officers may utilize audit services from commercial CPA firms as authorized in

1242.101.

1242.170 Contract clause.

The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 1252.242–74, Contract Audit Support, in solicitation

and contracts when other than firm-fixed-price contracts are contemplated.
**Exhibit 31**

**SEMT 2013-3**

EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d)Certification. 

I, Christopher J. Abate, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this reporton Form 10-K of Sequoia Mortgage Trust 2013-3 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”); 

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Actperiodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleadingwith respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other informationrequired to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports; 

4. Basedon my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicingagreements in all material respects; and 

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backedsecurities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K. 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Cenlar, FSBas Servicer, First Republic Bank as Servicer, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as Custodian and Master Servicer, and Citibank, N.A. as Securities Administrator and Paying Agent. 

Date: April 1, 2019 

/s/ Christopher J.Abate                                                         

Signature 

Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Financial Officer 

(senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
Case 2:06-cv-00767-MEF-SRW Document 32 Filed 12/22/2006 Page 1 of 1
### MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04

- 1 1

- 00 245

- CR
IN RE Theron PETERSON Original Mandamus Proceeding 1
PER CURIAM Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice Marialyn Barnard, Justice
Delivered and Filed: April 20 , 2011
PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED On March 30, 2011, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus, complaining of the trial
court’s failure to rule on his pro se motion for speedy trial. However, counsel has been appointed to represent relator in the criminal proceeding pending in the tr ial court for which he is currently confined. A criminal defendant is not entitled to hybrid representation. See Robinson
v. State , 240 S.W.3d 919, 922 (Tex. Crim. App. 2007); Patrick v. State , 906 S.W.2d 481, 498 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995). A trial court h as no legal duty to rule on pro se motions or petitions filed with regard to a criminal proceeding in which the defendant is represented by counsel. See
Robinson , 240 S.W.3d at 922. Consequently, the trial court did not abuse its discretion by

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2010

- CR

- 10830C , styled State of Texas v. Theron Peterson , pending in the 227 th Judicial District Court , Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Philip Kazen presiding.04

- 11

- 00245

- CR

- 2

- declining to rule on relator’s pro se motion filed in the criminal proceeding pending in the trial court. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52.8( a). Additionally, relator filed an Application for Leave to File Petition for Writ of Mandamus. No leave is required to file a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. T EX

. R.
A PP

. P . 52. Therefore, relator’s motion for leave to file is DENIED as moot.
PER CURIAM
DO NOT PUBLISH
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 295 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 295

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                    September 27, 2006.
Whereas recent student housing fires in Ohio, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, and 
        Maryland have tragically cut short the lives of some of the youth of our 
        Nation;
Whereas since January 2000, at least 75 people, including students, parents, and 
        children have died in student housing fires;
Whereas over three-fourths of these deaths have occurred in off-campus 
        occupancies;
Whereas a majority of the students across the Nation live in off-campus 
        occupancies;
Whereas a number of fatal fires have occurred in buildings where the fire safety 
        systems have been compromised or disabled by the occupants;
Whereas it is recognized that automatic fire alarm systems provide the necessary 
        early warning to occupants and the fire department of a fire so that 
        appropriate action can be taken;
Whereas it is recognized that automatic fire sprinkler systems are a highly 
        effective method of controlling or extinguishing a fire in its early 
        stages, protecting the lives of the building's occupants;
Whereas many students are living in off-campus occupancies, Greek housing, and 
        residence halls that are not adequately protected with automatic fire 
        sprinkler systems and automatic fire alarm systems;
Whereas it is recognized that fire safety education is an effective method of 
        reducing the occurrence of fires and reducing the resulting loss of life 
        and property damage;
Whereas students are not routinely receiving effective fire safety education 
        throughout their entire college career;
Whereas it is vital to educate the future generation of our Nation about the 
        importance of fire safety behavior so that these behaviors can help to 
        ensure their safety during their college years and beyond; and
Whereas by developing a generation of fire-safe adults, future loss of life from 
        fires can be significantly reduced: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) supports the establishment of September as Campus Fire Safety 
        Month;
            (2) encourages administrators and municipalities across the country 
        to provide educational programs to all students during September and 
        throughout the school year; and
            (3) encourages administrators and municipalities to evaluate the 
        level of fire safety being provided in both on- and off-campus student 
        housing and take the necessary steps to ensure fire-safe living 
        environments through fire safety education, installation of fire 
        suppression and detection systems and the development and enforcement of 
        applicable codes relating to fire safety.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
# L_2006007EN.01003202.xml

| 12.1.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 7/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.1.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 7/32

---

Corrigendum to Commission Directive 74/268/EEC of 2 May 1974 laying down special conditions concerning the presence of ‘Avena fatua’ in fodder plant and cereal seed

(
  Official Journal of the European Communities L 141 of 24 May 1974
  )

On page 19, Article 2, first paragraph:

for:

‘Member States shall issue the official certificate provided for in Article 11 of the Directive on the marketing of cereal seed,’;

read:

‘Member States shall issue, on request, the official certificate provided for in Article 11 of the Directive on the marketing of cereal seed,’.

---
§ 71.100 Criminal penalties. ( a ) Section 223 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, provides for criminal sanctions for willful violation of, attempted violation of, or conspiracy to violate, any regulation issued under sections 161b, 161i, or 161o of the Act. For purposes of section 223, all the regulations in part 71 are issued under one or more of sections 161b, 161i, or 161o, except for the sections listed in paragraph (b) of this section.
( b ) The regulations in part 71 that are not issued under sections 161b, 161i, or 161o for the purposes of section 223 are as follows: §§ 71.0, 71.2, 71.4, 71.6, 71.7, 71.10, 71.31, 71.33, 71.35, 71.37, 71.38, 71.39, 71.40, 71.41, 71.43, 71.45, 71.47, 71.51, 71.55, 71.59, 71.65, 71.71, 71.73, 71.74, 71.75, 71.77, 71.99, and 71.100.
[60 FR 50264, Sept. 28, 1995, as amended at 69 FR 3796, Jan. 26, 2004]