alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1

              SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


I, D. Scott Wilkerson, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of BNP Residential
Properties, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

         (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
         disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
         supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
         registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
         us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
         which this report is being prepared;

         (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
         and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
         effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
         of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

         (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
         control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
         most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
         reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal
         control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors:

         (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
         or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
         reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
         record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

         (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
         other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
         internal control over financial reporting.



August 9, 2004                      /s/ D. Scott Wilkerson
                                --------------------------------------------
                                D. Scott Wilkerson
                                President and Chief Executive Officer



                                       29
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 32
 
 Certification of Periodic Financial Report
 Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
 
 
 Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of Criticare Systems, Inc. (the Company) certifies that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended March 31, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in that Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 
 Date: May 11, 2004     /s/ Emil H. Soika
 Emil H. Soika, Chief Executive Officer
 
 
 Date: May 11, 2004 /s/ Michael J. Sallmann
 M ichael J. Sallmann, Vice President  Finance
 
 
 
 This Certification is made solely for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other purpose.
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 879 

To require the Government Accountability Office to conduct periodic reviews 

of the flood insurance rates and flood insurance rate maps under the 

national flood insurance program, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 6, 2017 

Mr. BILIRAKIS (for himself and Ms. ESTY) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To require the Government Accountability Office to conduct 

periodic reviews of the flood insurance rates and flood 

insurance rate maps under the national flood insurance 

program, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Flood Insurance Integ5 rity Act of 2017’’. 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 879 IH

1 SEC. 2. GAO REVIEWS REGARDING FLOOD INSURANCE 

2 RATES AND RATE MAPS. 

3 (a) PERIODIC REVIEW OF RATE TABLES.—During 

4 the 6-month period that begins 12 months after the date 

5 of the enactment of this Act and every 4 years thereafter, 

6 the Comptroller General of the United States shall con7 duct a review of the rate tables established by the Federal 

8 Emergency Management Agency for carrying out the na9 tional flood insurance program under the National Flood 

10 Insurance Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 4011 et seq.) and in 

11 effect at the time of such review, and shall make a deter12 mination of whether— 

13 (1) the chargeable premium rates for flood in14 surance coverage determined by such tables are ac15 tuarially sound, based on standard actuarial prac16 tices used in the private sector; and 

17 (2) such chargeable premium rates are suffi18 cient to ensure the long-term financial sustainability 

19 of the national flood insurance program. 

20 (b) ANNUAL REVIEW OF MAPPING PROCESS AND

21 RATE MAPS.—During the 6-month period referred to in 

22 subsection (a) and annually thereafter, the Comptroller 

23 General, in consultation with the United States Geological 

24 Survey of the Department of the Interior, shall conduct 

25 a review of the process in effect at the time of such review 

26 for establishing and updating flood insurance rate maps 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 879 IH

1 under the national flood insurance program and shall 

2 make a determination of the degree of accuracy of such 

3 mapping process. 

4 (c) REPORTS.—For each review conducted pursuant 

5 to subsection (a) or (b), the Comptroller General shall sub6 mit to the Congress a report describing the results of the 

7 review and the determinations made pursuant to the re8 view. 

Æ 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
SEP-14-S01 0 13:5 0 FROMiGDUERNO R HDEUEN S OF C 70132^20 5 70:202366720 2 

# %^MmmM M 

# State o f 

# Nort h Dakot a Offic e o f

th e Governo r 

## Joh n Hoeve n G(memo r Scptcmbc t 14 , 201 0 C O C D n o

> • •

_ o o

- O _

' . ^ } *—- ' "•"•'''"n' ' —HGO ^ 

# i§ ^ ooo . 2:- ^ G O Hunoiabl e Raymon dH . LaHoci d Secrecat y o f Transportatio n U S Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 120 0 Ne w J ctsc y Avenu e S E Washington , D C 2059 0 Dear Secretary I-aHood : I Ac awiidn g i n suppot t

o f th e I'arg u Municipa l Airpot t Authont/ s applicatio n for a Smal l Communit y Ai r

Servic e Developmen t

Progra mgran t

t o hel p America n Airline s establis h non-sto p ai r

setvic c betwee n Farg o an dDallas/For r Wort h o n 50-sea t

regional jet s operate dby America n Eagle . A s Nort h Dakota' s larges t dcy , an dagrowin g metropolita n area , Farg o an denviron s nee ddependabl e ai r

servic e t o busines s an drecreationa l destination s i n al l region s o f di e country . Departmen t

o f Transpoitatio n fiindin g will supplemen t communit y an dairpor t fundin g t o hel p initiat e th e servic e an dalocal hote l i s providin g a n in-kin dcontributio n 6c) r flight cre w roo mdiscounts . ITi e Municipa l Airpor t

Authority , th e Greate r

Fargo-Mporhca dFAX>nomi c Developmen t

Corporation , th e Chambe r o f Commerc e o f

f argo-Moorhea dan dWes t Farg o arc all providin g th e cas h matc h fur th e program . Pleas e not e tha t

th e Airpor t

Authorit y wa s awarde da200 5 gran t vi adii s program , whic h enable dDelt aAi r

Une s t o provid e roundtri p flights betwee n Farg o an dSai l Lak e City , 'llia t progra mwa s successful . Sincerely .

38:48:5 6
60 0 E Bmilcvai dAve . DiRmarck . N D .WSflS^XIO I I'hone ; 701.32 8 220 0 lf^x : 70132S-220 5 v7%wu)d,go v
# L_2023240EN.01010101.xml

| 28.9.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 240/101 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.9.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 240/101

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE No 229/2020

of 11 December 2020

amending Annex XX (Environment) to the EEA Agreement [2023/2031]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (“the EEA Agreement”), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/1861 of 31 October 2019 amending Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/587 in order to clarify whether the scope of that Implementing Decision includes exterior LED lighting fitted to certain not off-vehicle charging hybrid electric M1 vehicles (NOVC-HEV) (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/1861 of 31 October 2019 amending Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/587 in order to clarify whether the scope of that Implementing Decision includes exterior LED lighting fitted to certain not off-vehicle charging hybrid electric M1 vehicles (NOVC-HEV) (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex XX to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex XX to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following is added in point 21aet (Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/587) of Chapter III of Annex XX to the EEA Agreement:

‘, as amended by:

| — | 32019 D 1861: Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/1861 of 31 October 2019 (OJ L 286, 7.11.2019, p. 15).’ |
| --- | --- |

—

32019 D 1861: Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/1861 of 31 October 2019 (OJ L 286, 7.11.2019, p. 15).’

Article 2

The text of Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/1861 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 12 December 2020, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 11 December 2020.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Sabine MONAUNI

---

(1)  
  OJ L 286, 7.11.2019, p. 15.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
§ 52.57 Application for renewal. ( a ) Not less than 12 nor more than 36 months before the expiration of the initial 15-year period, or any later renewal period, any person may apply for renewal of the certification. An application for renewal must contain all information necessary to bring up to date the information and data contained in the previous application. The Commission will require, before renewal of certification, that information normally contained in certain procurement specifications and construction and installation specifications be completed and available for audit if this information is necessary for the Commission to make its safety determination. Notice and comment procedures must be used for a rulemaking proceeding on the application for renewal. The Commission, in its discretion, may require the use of additional procedures in individual renewal proceedings.
( b ) A design certification, either original or renewed, for which a timely application for renewal has been filed remains in effect until the Commission has determined whether to renew the certification. If the certification is not renewed, it continues to be valid in certain proceedings, in accordance with the provisions of § 52.55.
( c ) The Commission shall refer a copy of the application for renewal to the Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards (ACRS). The ACRS shall report on those portions of the application which concern safety and shall apply the criteria set forth in § 52.59.
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended
      June 30, 2006 (the “Report”) of Patient Safety Technologies, Inc. (the
“Registrant”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
      hereof, I, William B. Horne, as the Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge,
      that:





(1)
      the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)
      the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Registrant.





Dated:
              August 21, 2006
            
            /s/
              William B. HorneWilliam B. Horne
              Chief Financial Officer


A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
###### Editorial Note on Part 72

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 72 appear at 80 FR 74981, Dec. 1, 2015, and at 81 FR 86910, Dec. 2, 2016.

#### § 72.4 Communications.

Except where otherwise specified, all communications and reports concerning the regulations in this part and applications filed under them should be sent by mail addressed: ATTN: Document Control Desk, Director, Division of Fuel Management, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001; by hand delivery to the NRC's offices at One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland between 7:30 a.m. and 4:15 p.m. eastern time; or, where practicable, by electronic submission, for example, via Electronic Information Exchange, or CD-ROM. Electronic submissions must be made in a manner that enables the NRC to receive, read, authenticate, distribute, and archive the submission, and process and retrieve it a single page at a time. Detailed guidance on making electronic submissions can be obtained by visiting the NRC's Web site at *http://www.nrc.gov/site-help/e-submittals.html;* by e-mail to *MSHD.Resource@nrc.gov;* or by writing the Office of the Chief Information Officer, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001. The guidance discusses, among other topics, the formats the NRC can accept, the use of electronic signatures, and the treatment of nonpublic information. If the submission deadline date falls on a Saturday, or Sunday, or a Federal holiday, the next Federal working day becomes the official due date.

[68 FR 58818, Oct. 10, 2003, as amended at 74 FR 62684, Dec. 1, 2009; 75 FR 73945, Nov. 30, 2010; 79 FR 75741, Dec. 19, 2014; 80 FR 74981, Dec. 1, 2015; 84 FR 65646, Nov. 29, 2019]
September 20, 2016

Exemption No. 12659A

Regulatory Docket No. FAA–2015–1780

Mr. Tim Lawrence

Aerial Technology International, LLC dba ATIP, Aerial Technology International 

Productions, Apex Innovations

27350 SW 95th Ave #3022

Wilsonville, OR 97070

Dear Mr. Lawrence:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition for an amendment. It explains 

the basis for our decision, describes its effect, and lists any changes to the original conditions 

and limitations.

By letter posted to the public docket on July 22, 2016, you petitioned the Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA) on behalf of Aerial Technology International, LLC dba ATIP, Aerial 

Technology International Productions, Apex Innovations (hereinafter petitioner or operator) 

for an amendment to your current exemption. That exemption from §§ 61.23(a) and (c), 

61.101(e)(4) and (5), 61.113(a), 61.315(a), 91.7(a), 91.119(c), 91.121, 91.151(a)(1), 

91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) and (2), and 91.417(a) and (b) of Title 14, Code of 

Federal Regulations (14 CFR) allows the petitioner to conduct UAS operations. You 

requested an amendment to change the company name from Aerial Technology International, 

LLC to Aerial Technology International, LLC dba ATIP, Aerial Technology International 

Productions, Apex Innovations.1

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons 

relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested amendment to the exemption would not set a 

precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to the petitioner. 

 

1 The petitioner also requested to add aircraft. At this time, the FAA is unable to act on this request. When the 

FAA is ready to act, we will proceed accordingly and no further action will be required by the petitioner.
2

Our Decision

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 12659

remains valid and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the authority contained 

in 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 40113, and 44701, delegated to me by the Administrator, the operator is 

granted an amendment to change the operator name.

The operator shall add this amendment to its original exemption.

 

Conditions and Limitations

In this grant of amendment, Aerial Technology International, LLC dba ATIP, Aerial 

Technology International Productions, Apex Innovations is hereafter referred to as the 

operator. All conditions and limitations within Grant of Exemption No. 12659 remain in 

effect. 

Failure to comply with any of the conditions and limitations of this grant of exemption will be 

grounds for the immediate suspension or rescission of this exemption. 

This exemption terminates on August 31, 2017, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/

John S. Duncan

Director, Flight Standards Service
#### § 76.51 Conditions of certification.

The Corporation shall comply with the certificate of compliance, any approved compliance plan, and the requirements set forth and referenced in this part, except as may be modified by the certificate or approved compliance plan.
#### MORRISON, Respondent, v. BURCHELL, Appellant, two cases.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

July 31, *11321914.)

Action by James B. Morrison against George IP. Burchell.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment and order reversed, and new trial granted, costs to abide the event, unless within 20 days plaintiff stipulates to reduce the verdict to the sum of $100, in which event the judgment, as so modified, and the order, are unanimously affirmed, without costs.
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 05-2639

___________

In re: Stanley Reid Henricksen, *

*

Debtor, *

*

--------------------------------------- *

*

Hartford Life and Accident Insurance * Appeal from the United States

Company, * Bankruptcy Appellate Panel.

*

Appellee, * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

v. *

*

Stanley Reid Henricksen, *

*

Appellant, *

*

Nauni Jo Manty, *

*

Appellee. *

___________

Submitted: June 16, 2006

Filed: June 21, 2006

___________

Before RILEY, MAGILL, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.
-2-

Debtor Stanley Henricksen (Henricksen) appeals the Bankruptcy Appellate

Panel’s (BAP’s) denial of his Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) motion. We hold

the BAP did not abuse its discretion in denying Henricksen’s Rule 60(b) motion. See

In re Kirwan, 164 F.3d 1175, 1177 (8th Cir. 1999) (standard review). Accordingly,

we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________
# L_2020242EN.01004101.xml

| 28.7.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 242/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.7.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 242/41

---

Corrigendum to Council Directive 85/148/EEC of 29 January 1985 amending Directive 81/645/EEC concerning the Community list of less-favoured farming areas within the meaning of Directive 75/268/EEC (Greece)

(
  Official Journal of the European Communities L 56 of 25 February 1985
  )

| 1. | On page 18, in the Annex, table titled ‘ΠΙΝΑΚΑΣ ΟΡΕΙΝΩΝ ΔΗΜΩΝ ΚΑΙ ΚΟΙΝΟΤΗΤΩΝ (ΑΡΘΡΟ 3 ΠΑΡΑΓΡΑΦΟΣ 3)’, second column, point 30: |
| --- | --- |

1.

On page 18, in the Annex, table titled ‘ΠΙΝΑΚΑΣ ΟΡΕΙΝΩΝ ΔΗΜΩΝ ΚΑΙ ΚΟΙΝΟΤΗΤΩΝ (ΑΡΘΡΟ 3 ΠΑΡΑΓΡΑΦΟΣ 3)’, second column, point 30:

for:

| ‘30. | Νόμος ΚΟΡΙΝΘΙΑΣ’, |
| --- | --- |

‘30.

read:

| ‘30. | Νομός ΚΟΡΙΝΘΙΑΣ’. |
| --- | --- |

‘30.

| 2. | On page 19, in the Annex, table titled ‘ΠΙΝΑΚΑΣ ΟΡΕΙΝΩΝ ΔΗΜΩΝ ΚΑΙ ΚΟΙΝΟΤΗΤΩΝ (ΑΡΘΡΟ 3 ΠΑΡΑΓΡΑΦΟΣ 3)’, under ‘30. Νομός ΚΟΡΙΝΘΙΑΣ’, first column, point 59: |
| --- | --- |

2.

On page 19, in the Annex, table titled ‘ΠΙΝΑΚΑΣ ΟΡΕΙΝΩΝ ΔΗΜΩΝ ΚΑΙ ΚΟΙΝΟΤΗΤΩΝ (ΑΡΘΡΟ 3 ΠΑΡΑΓΡΑΦΟΣ 3)’, under ‘30. Νομός ΚΟΡΙΝΘΙΑΣ’, first column, point 59:

for:

‘Σαραντάπηχου (Οικ. Σαρανταπηχιώτικα)’,

read:

‘Σαρανταπήχου (εκτός οικισμού Σαρανταπηχιώτικα)’.

---
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas May 4, 2017 No. 04

- 17

- 00237

- CV IN THE INTEREST OF G.S., A CHILD , From the 407th Judicial District Court, Bexar County , Texas

Trial Court No. 2016

- PA

- 00112 Honorable Barbara Hanson Nellermoe, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R Appellant attempts to appeal from a final order terminating her parental rights. An appeal from such an order is accelerated. See T EX . F AM . C ODE A NN . § 263.405( a ). The trial court signed the order of termination on February 28, 2017
. Because this is an accelerated appeal, the notice of appeal was due on March 20, 2017
. See T EX . R. A PP . P . 26.1(b ) ; In re K.A.F . , 160 S.W.3d 923, 928 (Tex. 2005) . Although appellant filed a timely motion for new trial, this motion does not extend the appe llate deadline
. In re K.A.F . , 160 S.W.3d at 928. It is therefore ORDERED that appellant show cause in writing within fifteen days from the date of this order why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See T EX . R. A PP . P . 26.1(b); In re K.A.F . , 160 S.W.3d 923, 928 (Tex. 2005). If appellant fails to respond within the time provided, the appeal will be dismissed. See T EX . R. A PP . P . 42.3(c). All other appellate deadlines are suspended until further order of this court.

_________________________________ Irene Rios , Ju stice IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 4th day of May, 2017 .

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle Cler k of Court