alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Danielle Lewis - Homer City Notes 

 

Attached are edited notes and answers to the highlighted questions from ERG's October 23, 2012 email. 

Please note that in photograph "IMG_0003.jpg" , logos are visible in the foreground. Please see that the logos 

are either cropped from the photograph or somehow covered. 

If you have any questions, please feel free to give me a call. 

Additionally, could someone from either ERG or EPA reply back to me to confirm receipt of this email. 

Thanks, 

Joe 

Joe Stanek 

EME Homer City Generation, LP 

Environmental Manager 

1750 Power Plant Road 

Homer City, PA 15748 

Phone (724) 479-6256 

Cell (724) 762-7397 

Fax (724) 479-6300 

Email JStanek@mwgen.com 

From: Joseph Stanek <jstanek@mwgen.com>

To:

 

<Thomas.finseth@erg.com>, Danielle Lewis <Danielle.Lewis@erg.com>, 

<alicea.jezebele@epa.gov>

Date: 11/13/2012 1:13 PM

Subject: Homer City Notes

Attachments: EPA Notes 11.13.2012 Attachment.pdf; EPA Notes 11.13.2012.pdf

Page 1 of 1

file://C:\Documents and Settings\DLewis\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpwise\50A2477BDO... 11/13/2012
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-07-00138-CV

Carl Dixon d/b/a Dixon Contracting, Appellant

v.

Doug Groves and Patty Groves, Appellees

FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 4 OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY

NO. 06-0046-CC4, HONORABLE JOHN MCMASTER, JUDGE PRESIDING 

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

The parties have filed a joint motion to vacate the trial court’s judgment and dismiss

the case with prejudice to refiling, as agreed to in their Rule 11 settlement agreement. This court

has the authority to render judgment effectuating the parties’ agreement. See Tex. R. App. P.

42.1(a)(2)(A). Accordingly, we vacate the trial court’s judgment and dismiss the case with prejudice

to refile. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(e) (may vacate and dismiss case).

 

W. Kenneth Law, Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Law, Justices Puryear and Henson

Vacated and Cause Dismissed on Joint Motion

Filed: April 18, 2007
Subpart 1237.1—Service Contracts—General    **Parent topic:** PART 1237—SERVICE CONTRACTING1237.110-70 Contract clauses.       (a) The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 1252.237–70, Qualifications of Contractor Employees, in all solicitations and contracts for services where contractor employees will have access to Government facilities and sensitive information, including proprietary data and/or resources.          (b) The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 1252.237–73, Key Personnel, in solicitations and contracts for services when the selection for award is substantially based on the offeror's possession of special capabilities regarding personnel.
IV 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 514 

Supporting the observance of a Month of Global Health. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 26, 2005 

Ms. MCCOLLUM of Minnesota (for herself, Mr. GILCHREST, Mrs. 

CHRISTENSEN, Mr. SNYDER, and Mr. SCHWARZ of Michigan) submitted 

the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on International Relations 

RESOLUTION 

Supporting the observance of a Month of Global Health. 

Whereas child survival is a key element of global health and 

is of utmost importance to the United States and all 

countries of the world; 

Whereas child survival must be addressed on a global scale; 

Whereas increasing child survival rates is critical to population growth in countries around the world; 

Whereas child survival depends on access to key nutrients 

that can avert millions of unnecessary deaths in third 

world countries from preventable diseases; 

Whereas 5 simple interventions, if delivered to children before 

the age of 5, may significantly increase their chances of 

survival; 
2 

•HRES 514 IH 

Whereas these 5 interventions—vaccines, antibiotics, Vitamin 

A and micronutrients, oral rehydration therapy, and insecticide-treated bednets—can be provided to third world 

countries at minimal cost; 

Whereas 10,000,000 children die each year from preventable 

diseases in third world countries, and 6,000,000 of those 

deaths could be prevented by the use of these interventions; and 

Whereas it would be appropriate to observe November 2005 

as a Month of Global Health: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) supports the observance of a Month of 

3 Global Health; 

4 (2) reaffirms its commitment to ensuring that 

5 children around the world receive the interventions 

6 necessary for survival as an integral component of 

7 efforts to improve global health; and 

8 (3) encourages the people of the United States 

9 to observe a Month of Global Health with appro10 priate participation in key activities, programs, and 

11 fundraising in support of worldwide child survival. 

Æ
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 164 (Wednesday, August 24, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 52944]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-21638]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Environmental Management Site-Specific Advisory Board, Nevada

AGENCY: Department of Energy.

ACTION: Notice of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces a meeting of the Site-Wide Environmental 
Impact Statement (EIS) Committee of the Environmental Management Site-
Specific Advisory Board (EM SSAB), Nevada. The Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 86 Stat. 770) requires that public 
notice of this meeting be announced in the Federal Register.

DATES: Wednesday, September 7, 2011; 2 p.m.

ADDRESSES: Nevada Site Office, 232 Energy Way, North Las Vegas, Nevada 
89030.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Denise Rupp, Board Administrator, 232 
Energy Way, M/S 505, North Las Vegas, Nevada 89030. Phone: (702) 657-
9088; Fax (702) 295-5300 or E-mail: nssab@nv.doe.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Purpose of the Board: The purpose of the Board is to make 
recommendations to DOE-EM and site management in the areas of 
environmental restoration, waste management, and related activities.
    Purpose of the Committee: The purpose of the Committee is to review 
and prepare comments on the draft Site-Wide EIS.
    Tentative Agenda: The Committee members will review and prepare 
comments on the draft Site-Wide EIS.
    Public Participation: The EM SSAB, Nevada, welcomes the attendance 
of the public at its meetings and will make every effort to accommodate 
persons with physical disabilities or special needs. If you require 
special accommodations due to a disability, please contact Denise Rupp 
at least seven days in advance of the meeting at the phone number 
listed above. Written statements may be filed with the Committee either 
before or after the meeting. Individuals who wish to make oral 
presentations pertaining to agenda items should contact Denise Rupp at 
the telephone number listed above. The request must be received five 
days prior to the meeting and reasonable provision will be made to 
include the presentation in the agenda. The Deputy Designated Federal 
Officer is empowered to conduct the meeting in a fashion that will 
facilitate the orderly conduct of business. Individuals wishing to make 
public comments will be provided a maximum of five minutes to present 
their comments. This notice is being published less than 15 days prior 
to the meeting date due to programmatic issues that had to be resolved 
prior to the meeting date.
    Minutes: Minutes will be available by writing to Denise Rupp at the 
address listed above or at the following Web site: http://nv.energy.gov/nssab/MeetingMinutes.aspx.

    Issued at Washington, DC on August 18, 2011.
LaTanya R. Butler,
Acting Deputy Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2011-21638 Filed 8-23-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
```
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7318 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7318

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To amend the Federal Assets Sale and Transfer Act of 2016 to ensure 
 that the Public Buildings Reform Board has adequate time to carry out 
       the responsibilities of the Board, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FEDERAL ASSETS SALE.

    (a) In General.--Section 4(c)(2) of the Federal Assets Sale and 
Transfer Act of 2016 (40 U.S.C. 1303 note; Public Law 114-287) is 
amended--
            (1) by striking subparagraph (B);
            (2) by striking the paragraph designation and heading and 
        all that follows through ``In selecting'' in subparagraph (A) 
        in the matter preceding clause (i) and inserting the following:
            ``(2) Appointments.--In selecting''; and
            (3) by redesignating clauses (i) through (iv) as 
        subparagraphs (A) through (D), respectively, and indenting 
        appropriately.
    (b) Termination.--Section 10 of the Federal Assets Sale and 
Transfer Act of 2016 (40 U.S.C. 1303 note; Public Law 114-287) is 
amended by striking ``the date of enactment of this Act'' and inserting 
``the date on which the Board members are appointed pursuant to section 
4''.
    (c) Accounting System.--Section 12(e) of the Federal Assets Sale 
and Transfer Act of 2016 (40 U.S.C. 1303 note; Public Law 114-287) is 
amended in the first sentence by striking ``the date of enactment of 
this Act'' and inserting ``the date on which the Board members are 
appointed pursuant to section 4''.

            Passed the House of Representatives December 21, 2018.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
115th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 7318

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To amend the Federal Assets Sale and Transfer Act of 2016 to ensure 
 that the Public Buildings Reform Board has adequate time to carry out 
       the responsibilities of the Board, and for other purposes.
```
1/( '·

# )[_;(i~.~-J..~_:,_:_·_ •.

# :~t_·=:..

# :f·;.,

- J" ' --• • .//-;; / ! /_' ' -·' 

# THE STATE OF**TEXA~('h o** **,~!'1**

# 10

# 47 MANDATE**,-~\:~~s,-~-'**

# ..., ********************************************* Ots iR!{: ,:'

## ,:·-··:."~'-._. --(Eifff
TO THE 420TH DISTRICT COURT OF NACOGDOCHES COUNTY, GREETING: Before our Court ofAppeals for the 12th Court ofAppeals District ofTexas, on the 25th day ofMarch, 2015, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse yourjudgment between TOCARRA LOCKETT A/K/ A TOCARRA MCKIND, Appellant NO. 12-13-00357-CR; Trial Court No. F1320229 Opinion by Greg Neeley, Justice.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

was determined; and therein our said Court made its order in these words: "THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record and the briefs tiled herein, and the same being considered, because it is the opinion of this court that there was error in the judgment of the court below, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this court that the judgment of the trial court be reversed and a judgment of acquittal be, and the same is, hereby entered herein in accordance with the opinion of this court; and that this decision be certified to the court below for observance." WHEREAS, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order ofour said Court of Appeals for the Twelfth Court of Appeals District of Texas in this behalf, and in all things have it duly recognized, obeyed, and executed. WITNESS, THE HONORABLE .JAMES T. WORTHEN, Chief Justice of our Court ofAppeals for the Twelfth Court ofAppeals District, with the Seal thereof affixed, at the City of Tyler, this the 191h day ofMay, 2015. CATHY S. LUSK, CLERKCHJiif jUSTICE**jAM~S** T. WORTIIEN 

### TwELFTH COURT OF APPEALS [USTJUiS BRIAN HOYI.Ii GRF.r. NliELEY
May 19,2015

Ms. Loretta Cammack District Clerk 101 West Main Street Room 120 Nacogdoches, TX 75961 *DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL* RE: Case Number: Trial Court Case Number: 12-13-00357-CR F1320229 Style: Tocarra Lockett a/k/a Tocarra McKind 

### v. The State ofTexas FILE: COPY

Pursuant to Rule 18.1 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, enclosed herewith is the Mandate issued in the above cause. When the District or County Clerk has executed the Mandate in accordance with the opinion of this Court, the Clerk is requested to fill in the infonnation below and to return the attached copy to this office. Very truly yours, CATHY S. LUSK, CLERK

C Ms. Cristin Lane (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL) C Mr. Seth T. Johnson (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)

Mandate executed on 

## .:2

## -z-#1 day of**~** , 2015. Briefexplanation

## ~faction taken: 

# -fJ!/tA'JCIUILL t 

### )z(jL) < 

### )Jtt.dJ 

## ,At1fu.4,c:L-

# ~,U.Ut**'ij!J,u_j~ ~** **District/Gon~** Clerk 1517WBSTFRONTSTRBBT • SIJJTI!354 • 'l'YLBR, TX75702 • TI!L:903·593·8471 • FAX:903·593·2193 Serving**Ander~vn,** Angelina, Cherokee, Gregg, Henderson, Houston, Nacogdoches, Rains, Rusk, Sabine, San Augustine, Shelby, Smith, Tri11ity; Upshur, Van Za11dtand Wood Counties www.12thcoa.co;•rts.state.tx.us
#### § 455.154 Discretionary review by the Assistant Secretary.

On or before 15 days from the date of the determination under § 455.153(b), the applicant for a grant award may file an application, with a supporting statement of reasons, for discretionary review by the Assistant Secretary. If administrative review is sought pursuant to paragraph (a) of § 455.150, the Assistant Secretary shall send a notice granting or denying discretionary review within 15 days and upon granting such review, shall issue a decision no later than 60 days from the date discretionary review is granted. If administrative review is sought pursuant to paragraph (b) of § 455.150, the Assistant Secretary shall send a notice granting or denying discretionary review within 15 days and upon granting such review shall issue a decision no later than 30 days from the date discretionary review is granted. The Assistant Secretary may not issue a notice or decision under this paragraph without the concurrence of the DOE Office of General Counsel.
IV 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 117 

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Oversight and 

Government Reform in the One Hundred Fifteenth Congress. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 13, 2017 

Mr. CHAFFETZ (for himself and Mr. CUMMINGS) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration 

RESOLUTION 

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on 

Oversight and Government Reform in the One Hundred 

Fifteenth Congress. 

1 Resolved, 

2 SECTION 1. AMOUNTS FOR COMMITTEE EXPENSES. 

3 For the expenses of the Committee on Oversight and 

4 Government Reform (hereafter in this resolution referred 

5 to as the ‘‘Committee’’), including the expenses of all staff 

6 salaries, there shall be paid, out of the applicable accounts 

7 of the House of Representatives for committee salaries 

8 and expenses, not more than $18,595,472 for the One 

9 Hundred Fifteenth Congress. 


emcdonald on DSK9F6TC42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 117 IH 

1 SEC. 2. SESSION LIMITATIONS. 

2 Of the amount specified in section 1— 

3 (1) not more than $9,297,736 shall be available 

4 for expenses incurred during the period beginning at 

5 noon on January 3, 2017, and ending immediately 

6 before noon on January 3, 2018; and 

7 (2) not more than $9,297,736 shall be available 

8 for expenses incurred during the period beginning at 

9 noon on January 3, 2018, and ending immediately 

10 before noon on January 3, 2019. 

11 SEC. 3. VOUCHERS. 

12 Payments under this resolution shall be made on 

13 vouchers authorized by the Committee, signed by the 

14 Chairman of the Committee, and approved in the manner 

15 directed by the Committee on House Administration. 

16 SEC. 4. REGULATIONS. 

17 Amounts made available under this resolution shall 

18 be expended in accordance with regulations prescribed by 

19 the Committee on House Administration. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK9F6TC42PROD with BILLS
Order filed July 16, 2012.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-12-00455-CV

____________

IN THE INTEREST OF J.W.K. AKA J.K., K.D.R. AKA K.K., K.D.R., JR. AND 

Q.S.B., children

On Appeal from the 313th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2011-03425J

ORDER

This is an accelerated appeal from a judgment in a suit in which the termination of 

the parent-child relationship is at issue (“parental termination case”). Appellant’s brief 

was due July 16, 2012. No brief has been filed. On July 16, 2012, appellant requested a 

second extension of time to file the brief until July 26, 2012. When appellant’s first 

request was granted, the court notified appellant that no further extensions would be 

granted.
Unless appellant files a brief with the clerk of this court within 10 days of the date 

of this order, the court will dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. 

P. 42.3(b). 

PER CURIAM
#### In the Matter of Julius Walker, Appellant, v New York State Board of Parole, Respondent.

[814 NYS2d 558]

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (McNamara, J.), entered October 17, 2005 in Albany County, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of respondent denying his request for parole release.

In 1979, petitioner was convicted of murder in the second degree and was sentenced to 20 years to life in prison. In May 2004, he made his fourth appearance before respondent for release on parole. Petitioner’s request was denied following a hearing and he was ordered held for an additional 24 months. After the determination was affirmed on administrative appeal, petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding, which was later dismissed by Supreme Court. This appeal ensued.

Following the commencement of the CPLR article 78 proceeding, petitioner reappeared before the Board of Parole and his request for parole release was denied. In view of this, the instant matter is now moot and the appeal must be dismissed *(see Matter of Rivera v Travis,*8 AD3d 716, 716-717 [2004]).

Cardona, P.J., Crew III, Peters, Rose and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs.
Case 2:06-cv-00716-WKW-WC Document 2 Filed 08/16/2006 Page 1 of 4
Case 2:06-cv-00716-WKW-WC Document 2 Filed 08/16/2006 Page 2 of 4
Case 2:06-cv-00716-WKW-WC Document 2 Filed 08/16/2006 Page 3 of 4
Case 2:06-cv-00716-WKW-WC Document 2 Filed 08/16/2006 Page 4 of 4
# EUR-Lex - 31981R3021 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31981R3021

**Council Regulation (EEC) No 3021/81 of 19 October 1981 adapting, consequent upon the accession of Greece, Regulation (EEC) No 1108/70 introducing an accounting system for expenditure on infrastructure in respect of transport by rail, road and inland waterway **

*
Official Journal L 302 , 23/10/1981 P. 0008 - 0008 Finnish special edition: Chapter 7 Volume 2 P. 0191 Spanish special edition: Chapter 07 Volume 3 P. 0034 Swedish special edition: Chapter 7 Volume 2 P. 0191 Portuguese special edition Chapter 07 Volume 3 P. 0034 *

*****

COUNCIL REGULATION (EEC) No 3021/81

of 19 October 1981

adapting, consequent upon the accession of Greece, Regulation (EEC) No 1108/70 introducing an accounting system for expenditure on infrastructure in respect of transport by rail, road and inland waterway

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN

COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community, and in particular Article 75 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the Commission,

Having regard to the opinion of the European Parliament (1),

Whereas the Council has consulted the Economic and Social Committee on the Commission proposal pursuant to Article 198, first paragraph, of the Treaty; whereas the Committee has been unable to submit its opinion within the time limit set by the Council; whereas Article 198, second paragraph, of the Treaty permits the Council to take further action in the absence of an opinion; whereas the Council feels that it must avail itself of this possibility in view of the importance of rapidly adopting the required amendments;

Whereas Regulation (EEC) No 1108/70 (2), as amended by Regulation (EEC) No 1384/79 (3), should be adapted in order to include the rail network of Greece in the Annex thereto,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The following shall be added to the Schedule in Annex II to Regulation (EEC) No 1108/70 under point 'A. 1. RAIL - Main networks', after the entry 'Federal Republic of Germany':

'Hellenic Republic

- Organismós Sidirodrómon Elládos A.E. (OSE)'.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

It shall apply with effect from 1 January 1981.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Luxembourg, 19 October 1981.

For the Council

The President

P. WALKER

(1) OJ No C 144, 15. 6. 1981, p. 36.

(2) OJ No L 130, 15. 6. 1970, p. 4.

(3) OJ No L 167, 5. 7. 1979, p. 1.
§ 590.313 Trial-type hearings. ( a ) Any party may file a motion for a trial-type hearing for the purpose of taking evidence on relevant and material issues of fact genuinely in dispute in the proceeding. The motion shall identify the factual issues in dispute and the evidence that will be presented. The party must demonstrate that the issues are genuinely in dispute, relevant and material to the decision and that a trial-type hearing is necessary for a full and true disclosure of the facts. The Assistant Secretary or presiding official shall grant a party's motion for a trial-type hearing, if the Assistant Secretary or presiding official determines that there is a relevant and material factual issue genuinely in dispute and that a trial-type hearing is necessary for a full and true disclosure of the facts.
( b ) In trial-type hearings, the parties shall have the right to be represented by counsel, to request discovery, to present the direct and rebuttal testimony of witnesses, to cross-examine witnesses under oath, and to present documentary evidence.
( c ) The Assistant Secretary or presiding official upon his or her own initiative or upon the motion of any party may consolidate any proceedings involving common questions of fact in whole or in part for a trial-type hearing. The Assistant Secretary or presiding official may also place appropriate limitations on the number of intervenors who may participate if two or more intervenors have substantially like interests.
( d ) The Assistant Secretary or presiding official may make such rulings for trial-type hearings, including delineation of the issues and limitation of cross-examination of a witness, as are necessary to obtain a full and true disclosure of the facts and to limit irrelevant, immaterial, or unduly repetitious evidence.
( e ) At trial-type hearings, the Assistant Secretary or presiding official, or any other decisional employee directed by the Assistant Secretary or presiding official, may call witnesses for testimony or presenting exhibits that directly relate to a particular issue of fact to be considered at the hearing. The Assistant Secretary or presiding official, or any other decisional employee directed by the Assistant Secretary or presiding official, may also question witnesses offered by the parties concerning their testimony.
( f ) Trial-type hearings shall be recorded, and the transcript shall be made part of the official record of the proceeding and available to the public.