alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Instruction Manual Part 2a 

Instructions for Classifying the Underlying Cause of Death 

Errata for Year 2011 

 

Page# Content to be Corrected Corrections 

93-94 Removed 1st example from page 94 to last example on Corrected page attached 

page 93 

 2a January 2011E-1
 
Section III - Editing and Interpreting Entries 

16. Psychosis (any F29)

 

Code F09 (Psychosis, organic NEC) when reported due to or on the same line with 

conditions listed in the causation table under address code F09. 

 Codes for Record

 I (a) Pneumonia J189 

 (b) Psychosis - cerebrovascular F09 I672 

 (c) arteriosclerosis 

 (d) Arteriosclerosis I709 

Code to I672. The code I709 is listed as a subaddress to F09 in the causation table 

so this sequence is accepted. Arteriosclerosis will link (LMP) with cerebrovascular 

arteriosclerosis in the modification table. 

17. Mental Disorder (any F99) 

Code F069 (Organic mental disorder) 

When reported due to or on the same line with conditions listed in the causation table 

under address code F069. 

 Codes for Record

I (a) Cardiorespiratory arrest I469 

(b) Heart failure I509 

(c) Mental disorder F069 

(d) Multiple sclerosis G35 

Code to G35. The code G35 is listed as a subaddress to F069 in the causation table 

so this sequence is accepted. 

18. Parkinson’s Disease (G20)

Advanced Parkinson’s Disease (G2000)

 Grave Parkinson’s Disease (G2000)

 Severe Parkinson’s Disease (G2000)

a. Code G214 (Vascular parkinsonism) when reported due to conditions listed in the 

causation table under address code G214. 

 I (a) Parkinsonism G214 

 (b) Arteriosclerosis I709 

 (c) 

Code to G214 (Vascular parkinsonism) when reported due to conditions listed in 

the causation table under G214. 

 93 2a January 2011 E-1
Section III - Editing and Interpreting Entries 

Code G219 (Secondary parkinsonism) when reported due to: 

A170-A179 B060 B949 R75 Y20-Y369 

A504-A539 B200-B24 F200-F209 S000-T357 Y600-Y849 

A810-A819 B261 G000-G039 T66-T876 Y850-Y872 

A870-A89 B375 G041-G09 T900-T982 Y881-Y899 

B003 B900 G20-G2000 T983 

B010 B902 G218-G219 X50-X599 

B021-B022 B91 G300-G309 X70-X84 

B051 B941 I950-I959 X91-Y09 

 

 

 I (a) Parkinson’s disease G219 

 (b) Tuberculous meningitis A170 

 (c) 

Code to G219 (Secondary parkinsonism) when reported due to conditions 

listed in the causation table under G219. 

 I (a) Secondary Parkinson’s disease G219 

 (b) 

 (c) 

Code to G219 as indexed. 

19. Cerebral Sclerosis (G379)

 

Code I672 (Cerebrovascular atherosclerosis) 

 a. When reported due to or on the same line with conditions listed in the causation 

 table under address code I672. 

 Codes for Record

I (a) Cerebral sclerosis I672 

 (b) Diabetes E149 

Code to E149. The code E149 is listed as a subaddress to I672 in the causation 

table so this sequence is accepted 

 94 2a January 2011 E-1
#### JONES, Respondent, v. ROME HOLLOW WIRE & TUBE CO., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

July 7, 1914.)

Action by Griffith Solomon Jones against the Rome Hollow Wire & Tube Company.

No opinion. Motion for leave to appeal to Court of Appeals denied, with $10 costs. For former decision, see 147 N. Y. Supp. 1119.
Case 2:06-cv-00756-MHT-WC Document 29 Filed 03/23/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:06-cv-00756-MHT-WC Document 29 Filed 03/23/2007 Page 2 of 2
Case 2:06-cv-00756-MHT-WC Document 29-2 Filed 03/23/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:06-cv-00756-MHT-WC Document 29-2 Filed 03/23/2007 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Balance
Sheet, Statement of Operations, Statements of Cash flows and Notes thereto
incorporated in Part I, Item 1. of this Form 10-Q and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         201,786
<SECURITIES>                                    10,905
<RECEIVABLES>                                      263
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               218,954
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 218,954
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,649
<OTHER-SE>                                     213,305
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   218,954
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               128,731
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   78,396
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,988
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 94,237
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (12,592)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            106,829
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   106,829
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
#### § 52.27 Limited work authorization after issuance of early site permit.

A holder of an early site permit may request a limited work authorization in accordance with § 50.10 of this chapter.

[72 FR 57447, Oct. 9, 2007]
| (logo) WELLS

           FARGO | Corporate Trust Services

MAC R1204-010 

9062 Old Annapolis Road 

Columbia, MD 21045 

 

Tel:  410 884 2000 

Fax: 410 715 2380 |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

 

Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Cor p oration 

60 Wall Street 

New York, New York 10005 

 

 

RE: Annual Statement of Compliance for COMM 2013-LC6 Commercial Mortgage 

           Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2013-LC6 

 

 

Per the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of January 1, 2013 (the "Agreement"), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Certificate Administrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2014 (the "Reporting Period"): 

 

 

(a) A review of Wells Fargo's activities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under such officer's supervision; and 

 

(b) To the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period. 

 

 

 

March 9, 2015 

 

 

   /s/Brian Smith

BRIAN SMITH 

Vice President 

 

 

 

Wells Fargo Bank,N.A.
**Exhibit
        32.1**
 
 **CERTIFICATION
        OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE AND FINANCIAL OFFICER**
 **PURSUANT
        TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
        ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 In
        connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter
        ended
        June 30, 2007 (the “Report”) of Patient Safety Technologies, Inc. (the
“Registrant”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
        hereof, I, William B. Horne, as the Chief Executive and Financial Officer
        of the
        Registrant, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the
        Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge,
        that:
 
 (1)
        the
        Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 (2)
        the
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operations of the
        Registrant.
  Dated:
                  August 20, 2007
              By:
              /s/
                  William B. HorneWilliam
                  B. HorneChief
                  Executive and Financial Officer
 
  A
        signed
        original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
        to
        the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the
        Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
From: Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US

To: nfrey@omb.eop.gov

Cc: Beth Hassett-Sipple/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Joseph-J Dougherty/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Scott 

Jenkins/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, martin.karen@epa.gov, Susan Stone/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, 

Alison Davis/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Steven Silverman/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 06/07/2012 02:53 PM

Subject: Summary response to the interagency comments we received on the Air Quality Index (AQI) 

section of the PM preamble

Nathan, 

Attached below is a summary response to the comments we've received both verbally and in writing from 

the interagency group on the AQI. In addition, I'm attaching the studies that we discussed in our meeting 

yesterday, which include the studies you requested earlier today. We intend to modify the preamble to 

reflect the changes identified in this response. I'd like to discuss with you at 4:30 the timing for when we 

will send the revisions to the preamble that elaborate upon this summary response. Thanks. . 

Lydia

----- Forwarded by Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US on 06/07/2012 02:47 PM -----

From: Scott Jenkins/RTP/USEPA/US

To: Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: Karen Martin/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Beth Hassett-Sipple <hassett-sipple.beth@epa.gov>, Susan 

Stone/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 06/07/2012 02:40 PM

Subject: Response to Interagency comments on the PM AQI

Lydia,

Attached are responses to Interagency comments received on the AQI. 

In addition, I have attached the health studies noted by Susan on yesterday's teleconference. These 

studies were used to support the proposed decision to revise the 500 level of the AQI.

Schreuder et al 2006 

Barregard et all 2008

Delfino et al 2009

Mar et al 2000

Sarnat et al 2008
Comments 5 through 8 on the AQI

Response: As discussed on the teleconference on June 6, we agree to make several 

changes to the preamble discussion of the AQI 

- Rather than proposing two different possible approaches to setting the AQI 

value of 100, we will revise the preamble to propose setting the value at the level 

of the 24-hour PM2.5 standard and to solicit comment on the alternative 

approach of setting the value below the level of this short-term standard. 

- We will note in the preamble that the 500 level of the AQI does not establish an 

SHL and that we are not proposing an SHL for PM2.5 in this package. The 

preamble will also be revised to note that, if in the future we do set an SHL 

different from the 500 level of the AQI (i.e., as part of the Emergency Episode 

Program), we will adjust the AQI accordingly. 

In addition to these edits, we note that EPA (OAR, ORD) continues to work with CDC 

and with the Forest Service to create joint documents for use in fires and to create a 

central site on AIRNow containing information related to fires (airnow.gov/fire). 

We anticipate that such collaborations will continue and will contribute to the 

development of fire-related public health messages that will be useful across 

multiple Federal Agencies.
# EUR-Lex - 31984X0469 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31984X0469

**84/469/EEC: Application of Article 27 of the Sixth Council Directive of 17 May 1977 on value added tax (Authorization of a derogation, requested by the United Kingdom, with a view to avoiding certain types of fraud or tax evasion) **

*
Official Journal L 264 , 05/10/1984 P. 0027 - 0027 *

*****

Application of Article 27 of the Sixth Council Directive of 17 May 1977 on value added tax (1)

(Authorization of a derogation, requested by the United Kingdom, with a view to avoiding certain types of fraud or tax evasion)

(84/469/EEC)

In a letter dated 17 January 1984, the United Kingdom Government informed the Commission, pursuant to the above provisions, of its intention to introduce a measure derogating from the Sixth Directive with a view to avoiding certain types of fraud or tax evasion on supplies of gold, gold coins and gold scrap between taxable persons by a special tax accounting scheme.

The Commission informed the other Member States, by a letter dated 14 February 1984, of the intention of the United Kingdom Government.

In accordance with Article 27 (4) of the Sixth Directive, the Council Decision authorizing this derogation will be deemed to have been adopted if, within two months of the notification mentioned in the preceding paragraph, neither the Commission nor any Member State has requested that the matter be raised by the Council.

Since neither the Commission nor any Member State has asked for this matter to be raised within this period, the Council Decision is deemed to have been adopted on 15 April 1984.

(1) OJ No L 145, 13. 6. 1977, p. 1.
Nebraska Court of Appeals Memorandum Opinions

NOT Selected for Posting to Court Website

(released on or before September 12, 2023)

The following memorandum opinions were filed by the Nebraska Court of 

Appeals and can be viewed using SSCALES:

None Available

The above-listed memorandum opinions can be viewed online through the 

appellate court case search available by subscription through Nebraska.gov:

http://www.nebraska.gov/subscriber/.

Current subscribers to Nebraska.gov can search appellate court cases here:

https://www.nebraska.gov/courts/sccales/.
----

----

|                                        |   |                                                                             |
|---------------------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                        |   |                                                                             |   |
| Date:    March 28, 2013 | By:    | /s/          Erle Martin            |   |
|                                        |   | Name:    Erle Martin                                              |   |
|                                        |   | Title:      President and Chief Executive Officer  |   |
|                                        |   |                                                                             |   |

----

----
SAT Report

PMN Number: P-13-0945

SAT Date: 10/25/2013

Print Date: 4/1/2014

Related cases:

 

Concern levels:

Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments

Level of Concern: 1-2 2

 Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments

1 1 1 PMN

2 1 1 Hyd Pdt

Exposure Based Review:

Health: No Exposure based testing (health): XB level testing submitted with PMN

Ecotox: Yes

Routes of exposure: Health: Dermal Inhalation 

Ecotox: All releases to water

Fate: ; Hyd Pdt slow

Keywords:

 Keywords: MUTA; IRR-E,MM,L (UNCERT); AQUATOX

Summary of Assessment:

 Fate:

Fate Summary: P-13-0945-46

FATE: Estimations for hydrolysis product 

log Fish BCF = 0.50 (E)

log Fish BAF = -0.04 (E)

Hydrolysis Half-life = hr

EPA SANITIZED Page 1 of 3
BP = 307 C (E)

H < 1.00E-8 (E)

POTW removal (%) = PMN 90-99 via hydrolysis; then Hyd Pdt 0-25 via sorption; OECD 

301B(Mod Sturm CO2 ev): 42.63%/28d NRB; OECD111(Hydrolysis): t1/2(pH5,7,9):6.1-15 

mins/2.3-10 hrs/3.2-14 mins

Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg = Hyd Pdt mo

Sorption to soils/sediments = Hyd Pdt moderate - strong

PBT Potential: PMN P1B1; Hyd Pdt P2B1

*CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = Hyd Pdt slow

 Health:

 Health Summary: Expect moderate absorption via all routes (pchem). 

Concern for mutagenicity based on submitted test data. Uncertain concern for irritation to eyes, 

lungs, and mucous membranes based on the reactivity of the alkoxysilane moiety. Test data 

indicate that the PMN substance is not irritating to the eye.

 Test Data: (-) Salmonella with and without activation; (-) E. coli 

with and without activation; (+) in a mouse lymphoma assay with activation, (-) without 

activation; (-) oral rat micronucleus assay; rat oral LD0 = 2000 mg/kg; rat dermal LD0 = 2000 

mg/kg; no skin irritation in rabbits; no eye irritation in rabbits; no skin sensitization in guinea 

pigs using the Buehler assay; rat 15-day oral NOEL = 1000 mg/kg (highest dose tested); rat 

OECD 422 oral NOEL = 1000 mg/kg (highest dose tested) for both parental and 

developmental/reproductive toxicity

 Ecotox:

Test Organism Test 

Type

Test End 

Point

Predicted Measured Comments

fish 96-h LC50 10.7

daphnid 48-h LC50 16.2

green algal 96-h EC50 3.7

fish _ chronic value 0.776

daphnid _ chronic 

value

0.576

algal _ chronic 

value

2.5

Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50 _

Sewage Sludge _ Chronic 

Value

_

Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SARs for Alkoxy Silanes; SAR 

chemical class = Alkoxy Silanes; MW 274; pH7; 

with unknown MP(P); effective concentrations based on 100% active ingredients and mean 

measured concentrations; DW hardness < 150.0 mg/L as CaCO3; and DW TOC <2.0 mg/L;

EPA SANITIZED Page 2 of 3
Factors Values Comments

Assessment Factor 10

Concentration of Concern 

(ppb)

58

SARs Alkoxy Silane

SAR Class Alkoxy Silane

Ecotox Category Alkoxysilanes

Ecotox Factors Comments: 

 SAT Chair: L Keifer 564-8916

EPA SANITIZED Page 3 of 3
Note: This disposition is nonprecedential.



## United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2008-7014

KEVIN L. HOBSON,

Claimant-Appellant,

v.

JAMES B. PEAKE, M.D., Secret ary of Veterans Affairs,

Respondent-Appellee.

Kevin L. Hobson , of Phoenix, Arizona, pro se.

Maame A.F. Ewusi-Mensah , Attorney, Commercial Li tigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Depar tment of Justice, of Wash ington, DC, for respondentappellee. With him on the brief were Jeanne E. Davidson , Director, and Deborah A. Bynum , Assistant Director. Of counsel on the brief were Michael J. Timinski , Deputy Assistant General Counsel, and Tracey P. Warren , Attorney, United States Department of Veterans Affairs, of Washington, DC.

Appealed from: United States Cour t of Appeals for Veterans Claims

Judge Bruce E. KasoldNOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.



## United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2008-7014

KEVIN L. HOBSON

Claimant-Appellant,

v.

JAMES B. PEAKE, M.D., Secret ary of Veterans Affairs,

Respondent-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims in 05-0547, Judge Bruce E. Kasold.

__________ ________________

DECIDED: February 6, 2008

__________________________

Before MAYER, BRYSON and GAJARSA, Circuit Judges

.

PER CURIAM.

Kevin Hobson appeals the j udgment of the United Stat es Court of Appeals for

Veterans Claims, which reversed the B oard of Veterans’ Appeals decision denying

service connection for his disabilities, because the Secretary did no t fulfill his duty to

assist under 38 U. S.C. § 5103A. Hobson v. Nicholson , No. 05-0547 (Vet. App. Nov. 9,

2006). We dismiss the appeal.

This court lacks jurisdiction over this case because Hobson did not timely appeal,

and the time limit for filing a notice of appeal is not subject to equitable tolling.2008-7014 2 Furthermore, Hobson prevailed in his appeal at the Veter ans Court, so there would be

no issue to be considered here in any event.
#### McGOWAN, Appellant, v. O’BRIEN CONST. CO., Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

February 19, 1915.)

Action by John McGowan against the O’Brien Construction Company.

T. J. O’Neill, of New York City, for appellant. J. V. Bouvier, Jr., of New York City, for respondent.

No opinion. Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Order filed.
###### Editorial Note on Part 61

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 61 appear at 80 FR 74980, Dec. 1, 2015, and at 81 FR 86909, Dec. 2, 2016.

#### § 61.44 Stability of the disposal site after closure.

The disposal facility must be sited, designed, used, operated, and closed to achieve long-term stability of the disposal site and to eliminate to the extent practicable the need for ongoing active maintenance of the disposal site following closure so that only surveillance, monitoring, or minor custodial care are required.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                         109,842
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  525,718
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,113,464
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                46,079
<PP&E>                                         677,752
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,547,813
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          724,780
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        36,000
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,547,813
<SALES>                                      1,793,043
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,793,043
<CGS>                                        1,110,792
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,110,792
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               488,558
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              41,445
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                152,248
<INCOME-TAX>                                    30,450
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            121,798
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   121,798
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .04
        

</TABLE>
- ** Subscribe Now ! **
        - **  My Account  **
        -   **Sign In**  **Sign Out** 

HomeMilitaryLibraryPolicyArmyField Manuals3-19-1

            - Military Menu                       

              - Introduction
              - Systems
              - Facilities
              - Agencies
              - Industry
              - Operations
              - Countries
              - Hot Documents
              - News
              - Reports
              - Policy
              - Budget
              - Congress
              - Links

            - WMD
            - Intelligence
            - Homeland Security
            - Space

# Military

|  |
|--|

|  |
|--|

***FM 3-19.1**(FM 19-1)
#### McLAUGHLIN, Respondent, v. McLAUGHLIN REAL ESTATE CO. et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

May 29, 1914.)

Action by Leonora McLaughlin against the McLaughlin Redi Estate Company and others.

PER CURIAM.

Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Leave to appeal to Court of Appeals, denied, 148 N. Y. Supp. 1128. See, also, 147 N. Y. Supp. 959; 148 N. Y. Supp. 1128.

BURR, J., dissents.