alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 63
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 63 appear at 81 FR 86909, Dec. 2, 2016.

§ 63.74 Tests. ( a ) DOE shall perform, or permit the Commission to perform, those tests the Commission considers appropriate or necessary for the administration of the regulations in this part. This may include tests of— ( 1 ) Radioactive waste,
( 2 ) The geologic repository, including portions of the geologic setting and the structures, systems, and components constructed or placed therein,
( 3 ) Radiation detection and monitoring instruments, and
( 4 ) Other equipment and devices used in connection with the receipt, handling, or storage of radioactive waste.
( b ) The tests required under this section must include a performance confirmation program carried out in accordance with subpart F of this part.
#### § 602.12 Cost sharing.

Cost sharing is not required, nor will it be considered, as a criterion in the evaluation and selection process unless otherwise provided under § 602.9(d)(5).
#### Carmel Reddington, Appellant-Respondent, v Staten Island University Hospital et al., Respondents-Appellants.

Decided January 10, 2008

Certification of questions by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, pursuant to section 500.27 of the Rules of Practice of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.27), accepted and the issues presented are to be considered after briefing and argument.

Concur: Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones.
§ 431.85 Materials incorporated by reference. ( a ) *General.* We incorporate by reference the following standards into subpart E of part 431. The material listed has been approved for incorporation by reference by the Director of the Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. Any subsequent amendment to a standard by the standard-setting organization will not affect the DOE regulations unless and until amended by DOE. Material is incorporated as it exists on the date of the approval and a notice of any change in the material will be published in the Federal Register. All approved material is available for inspection at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030 or go to *http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html .* Also, this material is available for inspection at U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Building Technologies Program, 6th Floor, 950 L'Enfant Plaza, SW., Washington, DC 20024, 202-586-2945, or go to: *http://www1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/appliance_standards/ .* Standards can be obtained from the sources listed below.
( b ) *AHRI.* Air-Conditioning, Heating, and Refrigeration Institute, 2111 Wilson Blvd., Suite 500, Arlington, VA 22201, (703) 524-8800, or go to: *http://www.ahrinet.org*. ( 1 ) AHRI Standard 1500-2015, (“ANSI/AHRI Standard 1500-2015”), “2015 Standard for Performance Rating of Commercial Space Heating Boilers,” ANSI approved November 28, 2014, IBR approved for appendix A to subpart E as follows: ( i ) Section 3—Definitions (excluding introductory text to section 3, introductory text to 3.2, 3.2.4, 3.2.7, 3.6, 3.12, 3.13, 3.20, 3.23, 3.24, 3.26, 3.27, and 3.31);
( ii ) Section 5—Rating Requirements, 5.3 Standard Rating Conditions: (excluding introductory text to section 5.3, 5.3.5, 5.3.8, and 5.3.9);
( iii ) Appendix C—Methods of Testing for Rating Commercial Space Heating Boilers—Normative, excluding C2.1, C2.7.2.2.2, C3.1.3, C3.5-C3.7, C4.1.1.1.2, C4.1.1.2.3, C4.1.2.1.5, C4.1.2.2.2, C4.1.2.2.3, C4.2, C5, C7.1, C7.2.12, C7.2.20;
( iv ) Appendix D. Properties of Saturated Steam—Normative.
( v ) Appendix E. Correction Factors for Heating Values of Fuel Gases—Normative.
( 2 ) [Reserved].
[74 FR 36354, July 22, 2009, as amended at 81 FR 89305, Dec. 9, 2016]
I am joining Alaska Airlines in its effort to provide convenient service from Portland to our nation's 

capital.

Docket No. DOT-OST-2012-0029

Dear Secretary LaHood:

I am writing in support of the application of Alaska Airlines, Inc. to provide a daily direct flight to Reagan National 

Airport (DCA) from Portland International Airport (PDX). I believe that Alaska is the right choice. With their large 

Portland hub presence, strong customer service focus and track record for operational reliability, the carrier is best 

suited to provide a nonstop PDX to DCA flight.

Portland is the second largest market to the Washington DC area without nonstop service to DCA. With a nonstop 

route from PDX to DCA, Oregon and S.W. Washington residents will no longer be forced to use more time-consuming 

and less convenient service to our nation's capital.

I respectfully urge you to grant Alaska Airlines' application to serve PDX-DCA.

Karen Conley

Conley98001@gmail.com
EXHIBIT 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Form 10-QSB of Tangent Solutions, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the three months ending March 31, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Charles
M. Moche, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


/s/Charles M. Moche
Charles M. Moche
Chief Financial Officer
November 18, 2003


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
exv10w8



 






Exhibit 10.8



Natural Health Trends Corp.

STOCK OPTION GRANT




Option to Purchase



6,000,000 Common Shares




Presented To:




Randall A. Mason

111 Windy Point Drive

Marietta Ohio 45750




Key Dates:




July 24,
2002 – 2,000,000 options vest at $.01 per share

July 24, 2003 – 2,000,000 options vest at $.015 per share

July 24, 2004 – 2,000,000 options vest at $.02 per share

July 24, 2007 – Expiration Date



You may exercise your right to purchase all or any of the shares on or after the date on which such
shares vest, but in any event, not later than the Expiration Date. Your exercise shall be effective
when payment in full for the shares being purchased is actually received by the Company. The
Company shall not be obligated to deliver any stock certificates unless and until there has been
compliance with all requirements the Company may deem applicable. No exercise may occur after the
Expiration Date. This option and all rights provided for herein shall be of no force or effect and
no rights hereunder shall exist after the Expiration Date.





/s/ Mark D. Woodburn
                    



Mark D. Woodburn

President

July 24, 2002




This is not a stock certificate or a negotiable instrument
§ 719.17 Are there any budgetary requirements? ( a ) Contractors required to submit a Legal Management Plan must also submit an annual legal budget to Department Counsel.
( b ) The annual legal budget must include cost projections for significant matters at a level of detail reflective of the types of billable activities and the stage of each such matter.
( c ) For informational purposes for both the contractor and Department Counsel, the contractor must submit a report to Department Counsel comparing its budgeted and actual legal costs within 30 days of the conclusion of the period covered by each annual legal budget. The Department recognizes, however, that there may be departures from the annual budget beyond the control of the contractor.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1051 Reported in House (RH)]

<DOC>

                                                 House Calendar No. 181
115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1051

                          [Report No. 115-920]

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 6691) to amend title 18, 
United States Code, to clarify the definition of ``crime of violence'', 
 and for other purposes, and providing for consideration of motions to 
                           suspend the rules.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 5, 2018

     Mr. Buck, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 6691) to amend title 18, 
United States Code, to clarify the definition of ``crime of violence'', 
 and for other purposes, and providing for consideration of motions to 
                           suspend the rules.

    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 6691) to amend title 18, 
United States Code, to clarify the definition of ``crime of violence'', 
and for other purposes. All points of order against consideration of 
the bill are waived. The bill shall be considered as read. All points 
of order against provisions in the bill are waived. The previous 
question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and on any 
amendment thereto to final passage without intervening motion except: 
(1) one hour of debate equally divided and controlled by the chair and 
ranking minority member of the Committee on the Judiciary; and (2) one 
motion to recommit.
    Sec. 2.  It shall be in order at any time on the legislative day of 
September 13, 2018, for the Speaker to entertain motions that the House 
suspend the rules as though under clause 1 of rule XV. The Speaker or 
his designee shall consult with the Minority Leader or her designee on 
the designation of any matter for consideration pursuant to this 
section.
                                                 House Calendar No. 181

115th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                              H. RES. 1051

                          [Report No. 115-920]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 6691) to amend title 18, 
United States Code, to clarify the definition of ``crime of violence'', 
 and for other purposes, and providing for consideration of motions to 
                           suspend the rules.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           September 5, 2018

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
NBS

PUBLICATIONS

NATL INST OF STANDARDS & TECH R.I.C.

A1 1102142337

/Miscellaneous publication - National Bu QC100 .U57 V68;1925 C.1 NBS-PUB-C 1934



\
aU of Standard*

JUN 2 5 1926

qcioo • .1157


c/3 H

DCa<

DC

0^DOHDQ< J sl-l U g'g-B ju

US

J

!J<1

11:11

j.rj<

CQ£

J 1

CQ <?

en si ^ '! I 9 -j e9

\

\

\



\
#### In the Matter of Melvin Brown, Respondent, v New York State Board of Parole, Appellant.

from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, dated January 16, 1980, which (1) set aside a determination of the New York State Board of Parole establishing petitioner’s minimum period of incarceration (MPI) at 38 months and (2) remitted the matter to the board for the establishment of a new MPI not to exceed one third of the maximum of petitioner’s sentence. Judgment reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and proceeding dismissed on the merits (see *Matter of Russo v New York State Bd. of Parole,*50 NY2d 69, revg 69 AD2d 520). Mollen, P. J., Hopkins, Mangano and Cohalan, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 42 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                      January 26, 2005.
    Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker 
may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XVIII, declare the House resolved into the 
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of the 
bill (H.R. 54) to amend title 31, United States Code, to provide reasonable 
standards for congressional gold medals, and for other purposes. The first 
reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. General debate shall be confined to 
the bill and shall not exceed one hour equally divided and controlled by the 
chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on Financial Services. 
After general debate the bill shall be considered for amendment under the five-
minute rule. The bill shall be considered as read. No amendment to the bill 
shall be in order except those printed in the report of the Committee on Rules 
accompanying this resolution. Each such amendment may be offered only in the 
order printed in the report, may be offered only by a Member designated in the 
report, shall be considered as read, shall be debatable for the time specified 
in the report equally divided and controlled by the proponent and an opponent, 
shall not be subject to amendment, and shall not be subject to a demand for 
division of the question in the House or in the Committee of the Whole. All 
points of order against such amendments are waived. At the conclusion of 
consideration of the bill for amendment the Committee shall rise and report the 
bill to the House with such amendments as may have been adopted. The previous 
question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to 
final passage without intervening motion except one motion to recommit with or 
without instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
PGI 211.1 -SELECTING AND DEVELOPING REQUIREMENTS DOCUMENTS    **Parent topic:** PGI Part 211 - DESCRIBING AGENCY NEEDSPGI 211.105 Items peculiar to one manufacturer.       Office of Federal Procurement Policy memorandum of April 11, 2005, Subject: Use of Brand Name Specifications, reinforces the need to maintain vendor and technology neutral contract specifications, and asks agencies to publish the supporting justification when using brand name specifications in a solicitation.          Office of Federal Procurement Policy memorandum of April 17, 2006, Subject: Publication of Brand Name Justifications, provides additional guidance regarding publication of justifications for use of brand name specifications.
2015.606-1 Receipt and initial review.

(a) The Division of Contracts and Property Management shall acknowledge receipt of an unsolicited

proposal, complete a preliminary review, assign a docket number, and send copies of the unsolicited

proposal to the appropriate program office Director(s) or designee for evaluation.

(b) The Division of Contracts and Property Management shall be responsible for controlling

reproduction and distribution of proposal material by notifying evaluators of their responsibilities

and tracking the number of proposals received and forwarded to evaluators.

(c) An acknowledgment letter will be sent to the proposer by The Division of Contracts and Property

Management. The letter will provide an estimated date for a funding decision or identifying the

reasons for non-acceptance of the proposal for review in accordance with FAR 15.606-1(b) and FAR

15.606-1(c).

Parent topic: Subpart 2015.6 - Unsolicited Proposals
#### In the Matter of South Shore Yacht Club, Petitioner, v. State Liquor Authority, Respondent.

Proceeding pursuant to article 78 of the CPLR to annul a determination of the respondent State Liquor Authority dated December 22, 1969, canceling petitioner’s club liquor license. Determination confirmed and proceeding dismissed on the merits, with $20 costs and disbursements. In our opinion, the record establishes that petitioner permitted its license to be availed of by two corporate caterers for purposes of serving nonmembers during relatively lengthy periods of time. Although the activities of the caterers were clearly in violation of petitioner’s trust and confidence, this alone cannot excuse petitioner from its responsibility as a licensee. The activities of the caterers were not carried on in a clandestine manner hut were open and notorious and petitioner, through its officers, agents or employees, is chargeable both with the knowledge that these activities were being carried on and that they were in violation of the terms of the license. Petitioner apparently abdicated its responsibility and permitted its contractors to employ the license as they saw fit. Although the other five charges against petitioner might not be cause for cancellation in light of all the circumstances herein, we cannot say, even in view of petitioner’s prior unblemished record for law observance, that the charge of violation of section 111 of the Alcoholic Beverage *795Control Law in the manner established by the uncontested facts herein did not warrant the measure and mode of discipline imposed *(Matter of Stolz*v. *Board of Regents,*4 A D 2d 361). Christ, P. J., Hopkins, Munder, Latham and Benjamin, JJ., concur.
§ 603.570 Determining milestone payment amounts. ( a ) If the contracting officer selects the milestone payment method (see § 603.805), the contracting officer must assess the reasonableness of the estimated amount for reaching each milestone. This assessment enables the contracting officer to set the amount of each milestone payment to approximate the Federal share of the anticipated resource needs for carrying out that phase of the RD&D effort.
( b ) The Federal share at each milestone need not be the same as the Federal share of the total project. For example, the contracting officer might deliberately set payment amounts with a larger Federal share for early milestones if a project involves a start-up company with limited resources.
( c ) For an expenditure-based TIA, if the contracting officer establishes minimum cost sharing percentages for each milestone, those percentages should be indicated in the agreement.
( d ) For a fixed-support TIA, the milestone payments should be associated with the well-defined, observable, and verifiable technical outcomes (*e.g.*, demonstrations, tests, or data analysis) that are established for the project in accordance with §§ 603.305(a) and 603.560(a).
§ 429.51 Commercial pre-rinse spray valves. ( a ) *Sampling plan for selection of units for testing.* ( 1 ) The requirements of § 429.11 apply to commercial prerinse spray valves; and
( 2 ) For each basic model of commercial prerinse spray valve, a sample of sufficient size must be randomly selected and tested to ensure that any represented value of flow rate must be greater than or equal to the higher of: ( i ) The mean of the sample, where: and, x̄ is the sample mean; n is the number of samples; and xi is the ith sample; Or,
( ii ) The upper 95-percent confidence limit (UCL) of the true mean divided by 1.10, where: and, x̄ is the sample mean; s is the sample standard deviation; n is the number of samples; and t0.95 is the t statistic for a 95-percent two-tailed confidence interval with n-1 degrees of freedom (from Appendix A of this subpart).
( b ) *Certification reports.* ( 1 ) The requirements of § 429.12 are applicable to commercial prerinse spray valves; and
( 2 ) Pursuant to § 429.12(b)(13), a certification report must include the following public product-specific information: The flow rate, in gallons per minute (gpm), rounded to the nearest 0.01 gpm, and the corresponding spray force, in ounce-force (ozf), rounded to the nearest 0.1 ozf.
[76 FR 12451, Mar. 7, 2011; 76 FR 24779, May 2, 2011, as amended at 78 FR 62986, Oct. 23, 2013; 80 FR 81453, Dec. 30, 2015; 81 FR 4801, Jan. 27, 2016]
§ 39.45 Subsurface tracer studies. ( a ) The licensee shall require all personnel handling radioactive tracer material to use protective gloves and, if required by the license, other protective clothing and equipment. The licensee shall take precautions to avoid ingestion or inhalation of radioactive tracer material and to avoid contamination of field stations and temporary jobsites.
( b ) A licensee may not knowingly inject licensed material into fresh water aquifers unless specifically authorized to do so by the Commission.
# L_2023102EN.01009501.xml

| 17.4.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 102/95 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.4.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 102/95

---

UNILATERAL DECLARATION BY THE UNION IN THE JOINT COMMITTEE ESTABLISHED BY THE AGREEMENT ON THE WITHDRAWAL OF THE UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND FROM THE EUROPEAN UNION AND THE EUROPEAN ATOMIC ENERGY COMMUNITY

of 24 March 2023

taking note of the Unilateral Declaration by the United Kingdom in the Joint Committee established by the Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community of 24 March 2023 on market surveillance and enforcement

The Union takes note of the United Kingdom’s declaration on market surveillance and enforcement.

---