alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 626.4 General acquisition strategy. ( a ) *Criteria for commencing acquisition.* DOE shall consider the following factors prior to commencing acquisition of petroleum products for the SPR: ( 1 ) The current inventory of the SPR;
( 2 ) The current level of private inventories;
( 3 ) Days of net import protection;
( 4 ) Current price levels for petroleum products and related commodities, the ability to minimize costs and avoid incurring excessive costs in acquisition, and the possible effect on consumer and market prices of any SPR acquisition;
( 5 ) The outlook for international and domestic production levels;
( 6 ) Existing or potential disruptions in supply or refining capability;
( 7 ) The level of market volatility;
( 8 ) Futures market price differentials for petroleum products and related commodities;
( 9 ) The need to protect national security; and
( 10 ) Any other factor the Secretary deems necessary or appropriate to consider.
( b ) *Review of rate of acquisition.* DOE shall review the appropriate rate of petroleum product acquisition each time an open market acquisition has been suspended for more than three months.
( c ) *Acquisition through other Federal agencies.* DOE may enter into arrangements with another Federal agency for that agency to acquire petroleum products for the SPR on behalf of DOE.
IV 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 161 

Recognizing the 100th anniversary of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, 

the world’s largest organization of food and nutrition professionals. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 1, 2017 

Ms. FUDGE (for herself and Mr. TIBERI) submitted the following resolution; 

which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the 100th anniversary of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, the world’s largest organization of 

food and nutrition professionals. 

Whereas October 20, 1917, was the date on which the constitution and bylaws of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics (then known as the American Dietetic Association) were adopted; 

Whereas the Academy was founded in Cleveland, Ohio, by a 

group of visionary women dedicated to helping the American government conserve food and improve the public’s 

health and nutrition during World War I; 

Whereas during its first century, the Academy has grown 

from a charter membership of 58 into a worldwide, diverse membership of more than 75,000 registered dietitian nutritionists, dietetic technicians, scientists, cliniVerDate Sep 11 2014 00:19 Mar 02, 2017 Jkt 069200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6300 E:\BILLS\HR161.IH HR161

rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 161 IH 

cians, educators, students, and other food and nutrition 

practitioners; 

Whereas members of the Academy have from the organization’s founding to the present day played a pivotal role 

in shaping the public’s food choices, improving people’s 

nutritional status, and preventing and treating chronic 

diseases across the lifecycle; and 

Whereas October 20, 2017, should be commemorated as the 

100th anniversary of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) commemorates the 100th anniversary of the 

3 Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics; and 

4 (2) expresses hope that the Academy of Nutri5 tion and Dietetics proudly will enter its second cen6 tury and honor its distinguished history by con7 tinuing to improve the Nation’s health, by setting as 

8 bold a vision for the future as its founders did in 

9 1917, and by advancing the profession of dietetics 

10 through research, education and advocacy. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
PGI 243.1 -GENERAL

Parent topic: PGI Part 243 - CONTRACT MODIFICATIONS

PGI 243.170 Identification of foreign military sale (FMS)

requirements.

When adding FMS requirements using a contract modification, the contracting officer shall—

(1) Clearly indicate “FMS Requirement” on the front of the modification; and

(2) Refer to each FMS case identifier code by line/subline item number within the modification, e.g.,

FMS Case Identifier GY-D-DCA.

PGI 243.171 Obligation or deobligation of funds.

The contracting officer shall include sufficient information in each contract modification to permit

the paying office to readily identify the changes for each contract line and subline item.

(1) Include the information under the heading “Summary for the Payment Office” in—

(i) Section G, Contract Administration Data (Uniform Contract Format); or

(ii) The contract schedule (Simplified Contract Format).

(2) The information normally should contain—

(i) The amount of funds obligated by prior contract actions, to include—

(A) The total cost and fee if a cost-type contract;

(B) The target fee at time of contract award if a cost-plus-incentive-fee contract;

(C) The base fee if a cost-plus-award-fee contract; or

(D) The target price and target profit if a fixed-price incentive contract;

(ii) The amount of funds obligated or deobligated by the instant modification, categorized by the

types of contracts specified in paragraph (2)(i) of this section; and

(iii) The total cumulative amount of obligated or deobligated funds, categorized by the types of

contracts specified in paragraph (2)(i) of this section.
#### § 60.112 Overall system performance objective for the geologic repository after permanent closure.

The geologic setting shall be selected and the engineered barrier system and the shafts, boreholes and their seals shall be designed to assure that releases of radioactive materials to the accessible environment following permanent closure conform to such generally applicable environmental standards for radioactivity as may have been established by the Environmental Protection Agency with respect to both anticipated processes and events and unanticipated processes and events.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ALFREDO GARCIA, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

 v. 

CORIZON HEALTH, INC., 

Defendant-Appellee, 

and 

DONNA MENDOZA; et al., 

Defendants.

No. 19-15271 

D.C. No. 2:16-cv-04569-DJH 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

Diane J. Humetewa, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 5, 2020**

Before: SCHROEDER, HAWKINS, and LEE, Circuit Judges.

Arizona state prisoner Alfredo Garcia appeals pro se from the district court’s 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

AUG 11 2020

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
 2 19-15271 

summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging deliberate indifference 

to his serious dental needs. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We

review de novo. Toguchi v. Chung, 391 F.3d 1051, 1056 (9th Cir. 2004). We 

affirm. 

The district court properly granted summary judgment for defendant Corizon 

Health, Inc. (“Corizon”) because Garcia failed to raise a genuine dispute of 

material fact as to whether Corizon’s policy or custom caused him to suffer a 

constitutional injury. See Tsao v. Desert Palace, Inc., 698 F.3d 1128, 1139 (9th 

Cir. 2012) (a private entity is liable under § 1983 only if the entity acted under 

color of state law and the constitutional violation was caused by the entity’s 

official policy or custom); Toguchi, 391 F.3d at 1060-61 (a prison official acts with 

deliberate indifference only if he or she knows of and disregards a risk to the 

prisoner’s health; medical malpractice, negligence or difference of opinion 

concerning the course of treatment does not amount to deliberate indifference). 

The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying Garcia’s untimely 

motion for leave to amend his complaint because Garcia did not demonstrate good 

cause. See Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc., 975 F.2d 604, 607-09 (9th Cir. 

1992) (setting forth the standard of review and explaining that a party seeking 

leave to amend the pleadings after the date specified in the scheduling order must 

show diligence in seeking the amendment to satisfy the “good cause” standard).
 3 19-15271 

We reject as unsupported by the record Garcia’s contention that the district 

court failed to construe his pleadings liberally.

We do not consider arguments and allegations raised for the first time on 

appeal. See Padgett v. Wright, 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009). 

Garcia’s request for judicial notice of district court case law (Docket Entry 

No. 18) is denied as unnecessary. 

AFFIRMED.
**Exhibit
        32.2**
 
 CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO
 18
        U.S.C.
        SECTION 1350,
 AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of Patient Safety Technologies, Inc.
        (the
        "Company") on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2005 as
        filed
        with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
        I, William B. Horne, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
        to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
        Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
        The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
        The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 
 A
        signed
        original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
        to
        the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
        and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
  November
                14, 2005
              
              /s/ William
                B. HorneWilliam
                B. HorneChief
                Financial Officer
§ 71.99 Violations. ( a ) The Commission may obtain an injunction or other court order to prevent a violation of the provisions of— ( 1 ) The Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended;
( 2 ) Title II of the Energy Reorganization Act of 1974, as amended; or
( 3 ) A regulation or order issued pursuant to those Acts.
( b ) The Commission may obtain a court order for the payment of a civil penalty imposed under section 234 of the Atomic Energy Act: ( 1 ) For violations of— ( i ) Sections 53, 57, 62, 63, 81, 82, 101, 103, 104, 107, or 109 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended;
( ii ) Section 206 of the Energy Reorganization Act;
( iii ) Any rule, regulation, or order issued pursuant to the sections specified in paragraph (b)(1)(i) of this section; or
( iv ) Any term , condition, or limitation of any license issued under the sections specified in paragraph (b)(1)(i) of this section.
( 2 ) For any violation for which a license may be revoked under section 186 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended.
2903.602 Exceptions.       (a) In accordance with FAR 3.602, only when there is a most compelling reason to do so, is the Assistant Secretary for Administration and Management authorized to except a contract from the policy in FAR 3.601, after the Procurement Review Board and the agency ethics official have reviewed and recommended approval of the exception. However, when time does not permit, the Assistant Secretary for Administration and Management may unilaterally approve an exception. The exception and information supporting the exception must be provided to the contracting officer for their official records.          (b) When an exception under this subpart is requested, it is submitted through the director of the cognizant program office to the HCA. In the procurement request, the director must describe the basis for the exception from the restrictions of FAR 3.601.          (c) Except as allowed in paragraph (a) of this section, the Department of Labor may enter into a negotiated contract or an amendment to an existing contract with former employees of DOL within one year of separation (or with firms in which former employees are known to have a substantial interest) only after review and recommendation for approval by the agency ethics official, the Procurement Review Board, and written approval by the Assistant Secretary for Administration and Management.          (d) Approval of a decision to grant an exception as provided in this section must be documented by a written findings and determination prepared by the requesting official for signature by the Assistant Secretary for Administration and Management. The determination and findings must document compliance with FAR 3.603, FAR 9.5 and DOLAR 2909.5; specify the compelling reason(s) for award; and be placed in the contract files and the files of the Policy Review Board.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 2903.6 - Contracts With Government Employees or Organizations Owned or Controlled by Them
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 8, 2022

No. 04-22-00272-CV

Rebecca FLORES and Juan Flores,

Appellants

v.

SAN ANTONIO KITCHEN & BATH, LLC,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 3, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2021CV03517

Honorable David J. Rodriguez, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The court reporter’s record was due on July 5, 2022. On July 5, 2022, Ms. Kay 

Counseller, the court reporter responsible for preparing, certifying, and filing the reporter’s 

record in this appeal, filed a notification of late record, stating appellant had failed to pay or

make arrangements to pay the reporter’s fee for preparing the record and appellant was not 

entitled to appeal without paying the fee.

We therefore ORDER appellant to provide written proof to this court no later than July 

18, 2022 that either (1) the reporter’s fee has been paid or arrangements have been made to pay 

the reporter’s fee; or (2) appellant is entitled to appeal without paying the reporter’s fee. If 

appellant fails to respond within the time provided, appellant’s brief will be due within thirty 

days from the date of this order, and the court will only consider those issues or points raised in 

appellant’s brief that do not require a reporter’s record for a decision. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 37.3(c).

_________________________________

Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 8th day of July, 2022.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
Page 1 of 3

Disposition Comments

Docket No: FAA-2011-0454 These comments are in

Directorate ID: 2009-SW-54-AD response to an SNPRM

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

Next Step: FRAN SNPRM

 No Comments/Only Supportive Comments Received – If this box is checked, no signatures are 

required.

 Has the referenced service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? If yes, 

list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously 

published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance.

Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of 

each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues 

from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and 

describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA-IR-M-8040.1C Chapter 9.

ISSUE 1: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD: 

If NO, we don’t agree because 

ISSUE 2: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD:
Page 2 of 3

If NO, we don’t agree because 

For additional issues, double-click here
Page 3 of 3

Signature Section

Signature indicates concurrence with this action.

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

ASE Printed Name: Date

Branch Manager Date
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 241 (Thursday, December 16, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 78675]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-31717]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS


Sunshine Act Notice

AGENCY: United States Commission on Civil Rights.

ACTION: Notice of Meeting cancellation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On December 9, 2010 (75 FR 76698), the U.S. Commission on 
Civil Rights announced a business meeting to be held on Friday, 
December 17, 2010 at the Commission's headquarters. On December 13, 
2010 (75 FR 77613), the Commission submitted an amended announcement of 
the same business meeting to be held on Friday, December 17, 2010 via 
teleconference. Later on Monday, December 13, 2010, the meeting was 
cancelled. The details of the cancelled meeting are:

DATE AND TIME: Friday, December 17, 2010; 11:30 a.m. EST.

PLACE: Via Teleconference, Public Dial-In: 1-800-597-7623. Conference 
ID<greek-i>: 31039129.

Meeting Agenda

    This meeting is open to the public.
I. Approval of Agenda.
II. Welcome New Commissioners.
III. Management and Operations:
    <bullet> Review of transition, order of succession, continuity of 
operations.
    <bullet> Review of 2011 meeting calendar.
    <bullet> Staff Director's report.
IV. Program Planning: Update and discussion of projects.
    <bullet> Cy Pres.
    <bullet> Disparate Impact in School Discipline Policies.
    <bullet> Gender and the Wage Gap.
    <bullet> Title IX--Sex Discrimination in Liberal Arts College 
Admissions.
    <bullet> Eminent Domain Project.
    <bullet> NBPP.
V. State Advisory Committee Issues:
    <bullet> Update on status of North Dakota, Illinois and Minnesota 
SACs.
    <bullet> Update on Vermont SAC.
VI. Approval of Minutes of December 3, 2010 Meeting.
VII. Announcements.
VIII. Adjourn.

CONTACT PERSON FOR FURTHER INFORMATION: Lenore Ostrowsky, Acting Chief, 
Public Affairs Unit (202) 376-8591. TDD: (202) 376-8116.
    Persons with a disability requiring special services, such as an 
interpreter for the hearing impaired, should contact Pamela Dunston at 
least seven days prior to the meeting at 202-376-8105. TDD: (202) 376-
8116.

    Dated: December 14, 2010.
David Blackwood,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2010-31717 Filed 12-14-10; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 246 (Thursday, December 23, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 80895]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-32366]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Surface Transportation Board

[Docket No. EP 290 (Sub-No. 5) (2011-1)]


Quarterly Rail Cost Adjustment Factor

AGENCY: Surface Transportation Board, DOT.

ACTION: Approval of rail cost adjustment factor.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Board has approved the first quarter 2011 Rail Cost 
Adjustment Factor (RCAF) and cost index filed by the Association of 
American Railroads. The first quarter 2011 RCAF (Unadjusted) is 1.093. 
The first quarter 2011 RCAF (Adjusted) is 0.488. The first quarter 2011 
RCAF-5 is 0.462.

DATES: Effective Date: January 1, 2011.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pedro Ramirez, (202) 245-0333. Federal 
Information Relay Service (FIRS) for the hearing impaired: (800) 877-
8339.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Additional information is contained in the 
Board's decision, which is available on our Web site, http://www.stb.dot.gov. Copies of the decision may be purchased by contacting 
the Office of Public Assistance, Governmental Affairs, and Compliance 
at (202) 245-0235. Assistance for the hearing impaired is available 
through FIRS at (800) 877-8339.
    This decision will not significantly affect the quality of the 
human environment or the conservation of energy resources.

    Decided: December 20, 2010.

    By the Board, Chairman Elliott, Vice Chairman Mulvey, and 
Commissioner Nottingham.
Andrea Pope-Matheson,
Clearance Clerk.
[FR Doc. 2010-32366 Filed 12-22-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-01-P
NotesFAQContact Us

Collection

Thesaurus
AdvancedSearch Tips

Collection

Thesaurus
BrowseThesaurus

 Download full text

**ERIC Number:**

**Record Type:**

**Publication Date:**

**Pages:**

**Abstractor:**

**ISBN:**

**ISSN:**

**EISSN:**

Educational ResourcesHigher EducationSchools of EducationTeacher Education CurriculumTeacher Education ProgramsTeacher EducatorsTechnology EducationTechnology Integration

**Publication Type:**

**Education Level:**

**Audience:**

**Language:**

**Sponsor:**

**Authoring Institution:**

**Grant or Contract Numbers:**

PrivacyCopyrightContact UsSelection PolicyAPI
JournalsNon-JournalsDownloadSubmitMultimediaWidget