alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of James L. Dillard, Appellant, v. New York City Transit Authority, Respondent.

In a proceeding pursuant to article 78 of the CPLR to review a determination by respondent, made on April 17, 1968 after a hearing, which dismissed appellant from his position of Transit Patrolman in respondent’s employ, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered November 7, 1969, which denied the application and dismissed the proceeding. Judgment reversed, on the law, without costs; and matter remitted to respondent for further proceedings not inconsistent herewith. In its present state the record is insufficient to permit a determination of the question presented. There is no evidence as to whether the “restricted duties” to which petitioner was assigned have *996customarily been performed by those within the title classification of Transit Patrolman or whether they are, in fact, extraordinary duties. Nor does it appear when the “established” departmental policy under which petitioner was removed in favor of a civilian worker was established. Nor does it appear whether this policy has ever been applied to anyone other than petitioner. Although the Authority may have the right to establish such a policy, it is self-evident that it may not apply such policy in an arbitrary or haphazard fashion solely to pick and choose favored employees who shall remain on restricted duty while under disability. Nor does it appear whether or not petitioner’s disability was a “service-connected” disability, in which case, by respondent’s own admission, petitioner would have 'been entitled to retention for the period of his disability in accordance with departmental policy. Accordingly, the matter should be remitted to respondent (CPLR 7804, subd. [g]). Rabin, Acting P. J., Hopkins, Martuseello, Latham and Brennan, JJ., concur.
§ 501.167 Fuel use order. ( a ) *General.* OFE will issue a Fuel Use Order if, after considering all the information received during the proceeding, OFE determines that a person has committed, is committing, or is about to commit a violation of FUA or of an order or rule thereunder.
( b ) *Contents.* Any Fuel Use Order issued under this section shall set forth the relevant facts and legal basis for the order and where appropriate, the final penalty assessment and the basis therefor. When an administrative hearing is requested under § 501.166(a) of this part, the Fuel Use Order will include the recommended findings and conclusions of the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) and the basis for the penalty assessment. OFE will make a final determination as to any penalty assessment or other appropriate remedy based upon the recommended findings and conclusions of the ALJ and other information in the record of the enforcement proceeding. The order will be effective upon service, unless otherwise provided therein, or stayed pursuant to § 501.120.
( c ) *Service.* OFE will serve a copy of the Fuel Use Order upon any person who was served a copy of the notice of violation and upon all parties to any public proceeding on the notice of violation. OFE will place a copy of each final order on file in the Public Information Office described in § 501.12.
( d ) *Judicial review.* Any person against whom a penalty is assessed pursuant to § 501.167(b) after a hearing before an ALJ may, within sixty (60) calendar days after the date of issuance of the order assessing such penalty, institute an action in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate judicial circuit for judicial review of such order in accordance with the provisions of section 723 of FUA.
#### Ruth Barton et al., Appellants, v. City of Saratoga Springs, Respondent. (And 2 Other Actions.)

Order affirmed, without costs, on authority of *Kratz*v. *Dussault*(33 A D 2d 826). No opinion. Herlihy, P. J., Reynolds, Staley, Jr., Greenblott and Cooke, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 335 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 335

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                        December 9 (legislative day, December 8), 2006.
Whereas epidermolysis bullosa is a rare disease characterized by the presence of 
        extremely fragile skin that results in the development of recurrent, 
        painful blisters, open sores, and in some forms of the disease, in 
        disfiguring scars, disabling musculoskeletal deformities, and internal 
        blistering;
Whereas approximately 12,500 individuals in the United States are affected by 
        the disease;
Whereas data from the National Epidermolysis Bullosa Registry indicates that of 
        every one million live births, 20 infants are born with the disease;
Whereas there currently is no cure for the disease;
Whereas children with the disease require almost around-the-clock care;
Whereas approximately 90 percent of individuals with epidermolysis bullosa 
        report experiencing pain on an average day;
Whereas the skin is so fragile for individuals with the disease that even minor 
        rubbing and day-to-day activity may cause blistering, including from 
        activities such as writing, eating, walking, and from the seams on their 
        clothes;
Whereas most individuals with the disease have inherited the disease through 
        genes they receive from one or both parents;
Whereas epidermolysis bullosa is so rare that many health care practitioners 
        have never heard of it or seen a patient with it;
Whereas individuals with epidermolysis bullosa often feel isolated because of 
        the lack of knowledge in the Nation about the disease and the impact 
        that it has on the body;
Whereas more funds should be dedicated toward research to develop treatments and 
        eventually a cure for the disease; and
Whereas the last week of October would be an appropriate time to recognize 
        National Epidermolysis Bullosa Week in order to raise public awareness 
        about the prevalence of epidermolysis bullosa, the impact it has on 
        families, and the need for additional research into a cure for the 
        disease: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) supports the goals and ideals of a National Epidermolysis 
        Bullosa Awareness Week to raise public awareness and understanding of 
        epidermolysis bullosa;
            (2) recognizes the need for a cure for the disease; and
            (3) encourages the people of the United States and interested groups 
        to support the week through appropriate ceremonies and activities to 
        promote public awareness of epidermolysis bullosa and to foster 
        understanding of the impact of the disease on patients and their 
        families.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
#### § 52.159 Standards for review of application.

Applications filed under this subpart will be reviewed according to the applicable standards set out in 10 CFR parts 20, 50 and its appendices, 51, 73, and 100 and its appendices.
VIA ELECTRONIC SUBMISSION

The Rules Docket (AGC 200)

Federal Aviation Administration

800 Independence Avenue, SW

Washington, DC. 20591

Re: Request to withdraw a petition to renew Exemption Number 10492 by the Lone Star 

Flight Museum.

To Whom It May Concern:

The Lone Star Flight Museum wishes to withdraw a prior petition dated November 25, 2014 to 

renew Exemption Number 10492. We will apply for a new LHFE exemption under the new guidance 

published in July of this year. 

Thank you for your assistance in this matter,

Very Truly yours,

 

Larry J. Gregory

President

Lone Star Flight Museum
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsBOREAS TE-18 Landsat TM Maximum Likelihood Classification Image of the NSAThe BOREAS TE-18 team focused its efforts on using remotely sensed data to characterize the successional and disturbance dynamics of the boreal forest for use in carbon modeling. The objective of this classification is to provide the BOREAS investigators with a data product that characterizes the land cover of the NSA. A Landsat-5 TM image from 20-Aug-1988 was used to derive this classification. A standard supervised maximum likelihood classification approach was used to produce this classification. The data are provided in a binary image format file. The data files are available on a CD-ROM (see document number 20010000884), or from the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) Distributed Activity Archive Center (DAAC).Document ID20010004615Acquisition SourceGoddard Space Flight CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsHall, Forrest G.*(NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt, MD United States)*Knapp, David*(Raytheon Information Technology and Scientific Services Greenbelt, MD United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 7, 2013Publication DateOctober 1, 2000Subject CategoryEarth Resources And Remote SensingReport/Patent NumberRept-2000-03136-0/VOL172NASA/TM-2000-209891/VOL172NAS 1.15:209891/VOL172Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 462-33-01Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20010004615.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
§ 780.50 Applicants. ( a ) Any owner or licensee of a patent licensed under section 158 or subsections b or e of section 153 of the Act may file an application with the Board for the determination of a reasonable royalty fee.
( b ) Any owner or licensee of a patent licensed under subsections b or e of section 153 of the Act may file an application with the Board for the modification of any terms and conditions of the license.
( c ) Any person who has made an invention or discovery useful in the production or utilization of special nuclear material or atomic energy, has complied with the provisions of section 151c, but, under the Act, is not entitled to a royalty for such invention or discovery, may file an application for an award.
( d ) Any owner of a patent application that contains restricted data not belonging to the United States which the Department has communicated to any foreign nation may make application for just compensation pursuant to section 173 of the Act.
( e ) Any patent applicant, whose patent is withheld because of a secrecy order issued at the request of the Department may, beginning at the date the patent applicant is notified that, except for such order, the application is otherwise in condition for allowance, apply for compensation for the damage caused by the secrecy order and/or for the use of the invention by the Government, resulting from any disclosure to the Department required by the Invention Secrecy Act.
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 826 

To require the head of each executive agency to relocate such agency outside 

of the Washington, D.C., metropolitan area, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 2, 2017 

Mr. DAVIDSON (for himself and Mr. BUDD) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To require the head of each executive agency to relocate 

such agency outside of the Washington, D.C., metropolitan area, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Drain the Swamp Act 

5 of 2017’’. 

6 SEC. 2. RELOCATION OF AGENCY HEADQUARTERS. 

7 (a) REPEAL OF HEADQUARTERS LOCATION RE8 QUIREMENT.—Section 72 of title 4, United States Code, 

9 is repealed. 

10 (b) HEADQUARTERS RELOCATION PLAN.— 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 826 IH

1 (1) IN GENERAL.—Not later than September 

2 30, 2018, the head of each executive agency shall 

3 develop and submit to Congress a plan for the relo4 cation of the headquarters of that agency outside of 

5 the Washington metropolitan area. 

6 (2) REQUIREMENTS.—The plan described in 

7 paragraph (1) shall— 

8 (A) identify a location for a new head9 quarters outside of the Washington metropoli10 tan area; 

11 (B) maximize any potential cost savings 

12 associated with the relocation; 

13 (C) provide that, upon implementation of 

14 the plan, no more than 10 percent of the em15 ployees of the agency are based in the Wash16 ington metropolitan area; and 

17 (D) consider any potential national secu18 rity implications of the relocation. 

19 (3) CERTIFICATION.—Prior to the submission 

20 of a plan under paragraph (1), the Director of the 

21 Office of Management and Budget and the Adminis22 trator of General Services shall certify the compli23 ance of the plan with the provisions of this section 

24 if the plan meets the requirements described in 

25 paragraph (2). 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 826 IH

1 (4) IMPLEMENTATION.—Not later than Sep2 tember 30, 2023, the head of each executive agency 

3 shall implement the plan for such agency submitted 

4 under paragraph (1). 

5 (c) DEFINITIONS.—For purposes of this section: 

6 (1) EXECUTIVE AGENCY.—The term ‘‘executive 

7 agency’’ has the meaning given the term ‘‘Executive 

8 agency’’ in section 105 of title 5, United States 

9 Code, except that the term does not include the Ex10 ecutive Office of the President. 

11 (2) WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA.—The 

12 term ‘‘Washington metropolitan area’’ means the ge13 ographic area located within the boundaries of— 

14 (A) the District of Columbia; 

15 (B) Montgomery and Prince George’s 

16 Counties in the State of Maryland; and 

17 (C) Arlington, Fairfax, Loudon, and 

18 Prince William Counties and the City of Alex19 andria in the Commonwealth of Virginia. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
IV 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 285 

Expressing the sense of the United States House of Representatives that 

Congress and the President should empower the creation of police and 

community alliances designed to enhance and improve communication 

and collaboration between members of the law enforcement community 

and the public they serve. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 26, 2017 

Mr. TAYLOR (for himself, Mr. O’HALLERAN, Mr. REICHERT, and Mr. PASCRELL) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the United States House of Representatives that Congress and the President should empower the creation of police and community alliances 

designed to enhance and improve communication and 

collaboration between members of the law enforcement 

community and the public they serve. 

Whereas the United States of America was founded upon the 

principles of republican governance which include, but are 

not limited to, an adherence to the rule of law; 

Whereas the American law enforcement community embodies 

society’s most salient defenders of the rule of law; 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 285 IH 

Whereas the ability of the American law enforcement community to effectively preserve the rights of American citizens 

and uphold the rule of law is predicated upon a healthy 

and collaborative relationship between police officers and 

the communities they serve; 

Whereas police and community relations have recently experienced periods of strain, where mistrust and suspicion 

have come to dominate police and community interactions 

in many communities and undermine effective policing 

strategies and public safety; 

Whereas the legitimate concerns of citizens as well as those 

of the law enforcement community are not always well 

understood by each respective constituency; and 

Whereas an open, constructive, and mutually respectful dialogue meant to address these legitimate concerns can 

dramatically improve police and community relations, improve public safety, and engage all of society’s stakeholders: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that Congress and the President should em3 power the creation of police and community alliances de4 signed to enhance and improve communication and col5 laboration between members of the law enforcement com6 munity and the public they serve. 

Æ 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
###### Editorial Note on Part 70

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 70 appear at 81 FR 86910, Dec. 2, 2016.

#### § 70.14 Foreign military aircraft.

The regulations in this part do not apply to persons who carry special nuclear material (other than plutonium) in aircraft of the armed forces of foreign nations subject to 49 U.S.C. 40103(d).

[71 FR 15012, Mar. 27, 2006]
PGI 223.7305 Authorization and approval.       The contracting officer shall ensure that the appropriate authorizations from the program executive office are included in the solicitation and contract. The contracting officer shall forward proposals submitted by an offeror or requests from a Contractor seeking authorization to use hexavalent chromium in a deliverable item, to the cognizant program executive office for evaluation and, if necessary, authorization by the appropriate official.    **Parent topic:** PGI 223.73 -MINIMIZING THE USE OF MATERIALS CONTAINING HEXAVALENT CHROMIUM
#### § 600.204 Effect on other issuances.

All other grants administration provisions of codified program regulations, program manuals, handbooks and other nonregulatory materials which are inconsistent with this subpart are superseded, except to the extent they are required by statute, or authorized in accordance with the exception provision in § 600.205.

[53 FR 8045, 8087, Mar. 11, 1988. Redesignated at 59 FR 53264, Oct. 21, 1994, as amended at 61 FR 7165, Feb. 26, 1996]
310.001 Policy.       Market research shall be conducted as prescribed in Federal Acquisition Regulation part 10.    **Parent topic:** PART 310 - MARKET RESEARCH
IV 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 199 

Recognizing the self determination of Gibraltar to determine its status as 

a British Overseas Territory. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 15, 2017 

Mr. HOLDING (for himself, Mr. CONNOLLY, Mr. DIAZ-BALART, Ms. FRANKEL

of Florida, Mr. NUNES, Mrs. RADEWAGEN, Mr. KIND, Mr. KILMER, Mr. 

COOPER, Mr. THOMAS J. ROONEY of Florida, Mr. SHERMAN, Ms. ROSLEHTINEN, Mr. ROSKAM, Mr. COURTNEY, Mr. HASTINGS, Mr. 

FLEISCHMANN, Mr. RUPPERSBERGER, Mr. SENSENBRENNER, Mr. HIGGINS of New York, and Ms. SPEIER) submitted the following resolution; 

which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the self determination of Gibraltar to determine 

its status as a British Overseas Territory. 

Whereas the Department of State recognizes Gibraltar as an 

overseas territory of the United Kingdom based on the 

1713 Treaty of Utrecht; 

Whereas the citizens of Gibraltar have freely and democratically expressed their view to remain a British Overseas 

Territory in 1967 and 2002 when 99.6 and 98.48 percent 

of the Gibraltarians, respectively, voted in a popular 

referenda their wish to remain a British Overseas Territory; 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 199 IH 

Whereas the United States has relied on Gibraltar’s military 

facilities numerous times, including America’s first overseas military intervention in 1801 against the Barbary 

States, World War II, and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization intervention in 2011 in Libya; 

Whereas, during World War II, General Dwight Eisenhower 

used Gibraltar as his headquarters to plan the liberation 

of North Africa stating, ‘‘Without it the vital air cover 

would not have been quickly established on the North African fields.’’; 

Whereas the security situation in North Africa and the Middle East continues to underscore the need for the United 

States to maintain secure access to Gibraltar’s military 

facilities; 

Whereas Gibraltar has the right, under the United Nations 

Charter and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, to determine its own future; and 

Whereas the United Kingdom is a loyal ally that has stood 

by the United States: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that— 

3 (1) the United States honors the contribution 

4 that Gibraltar has made to advancing United States 

5 security interests in the Mediterranean region since 

6 1801 and extends its deepest appreciation and 

7 thanks to the Government of Gibraltar and its citi8 zens; and 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 199 IH 

1 (2) the views and rights of Gibraltarians should 

2 always be imperative in any discussion of Gibraltar’s 

3 status as a British Overseas Territory. 

Æ 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 00-11337

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

RICHARD KEVIN CHANDLER,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:00-CR-99-4-A

--------------------

June 14, 2001

Before WIENER, DeMOSS, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Richard Kevin Chandler appeals his sentence for receiving

stolen mail. Chandler argues that the district court abused its

discretion by departing upward to the 60-month statutory maximum

sentence based on its determination that Chandler’s criminal

history did not adequately reflect the seriousness of his past

criminal conduct or the likelihood that he would commit future

crimes. Chandler contends that the extent of the district

court’s departure was unreasonable and that the court failed to

explain why a lesser departure would not have been an adequate
No. 00-11337

-2-

sanction. Chandler does not dispute that he committed the

additional offenses cited by the district court in support of the

upward departure. Based on the undisputed facts presented at

sentencing, Chandler’s sentence was within the discretion of the

district court. United States v. McDowell, 109 F.3d 214, 219

(5th Cir. 1997); United States v. Ashburn, 38 F.3d 803, 807 (5th

Cir. 1994) (en banc).

AFFIRMED.
#### American Motorists Insurance Company *v.*Lynda Brookman et al.

*David M. Reilly,*in support of the petition.

*Marshall S. Feingold,*in opposition.

Decided April 10, 1984

The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 1 Conn. App. 219, is denied.