alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION

SOUTHEASTERN BOLL WEEVIL )

ERADICATION FOUNDATION, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

v. ) 2:06cv756-MHT

) 

BOLL WEEVIL ERADICATION )

FOUNDATION OF GEORGIA, )

INC., and TOMMY IRVIN, in )

his capacity as Trustee )

of Boll Weevil Eradication )

Foundation of Georgia, )

Inc., )

)

Defendants. )

ORDER

It is ORDERED that the motion to extend deadline

(Doc. No. 36) is granted.

DONE, this the 25th day of June, 2007.

 /s/ Myron H. Thompson 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00756-MHT-WC Document 37 Filed 06/25/2007 Page 1 of 1
#### James J. Leff v State Commission on Judicial Conduct of the State of New York et al.

Motion for a stay denied. On the present papers there is no showing that the action of respondents is arbitrary or capricious or illegal or in violation of constitutional rights. (See *Matter of Nicholson v State Comm, on Judicial Conduct,*50 NY2d 597, 611-612.) Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Lupiano, Silverman and Yesawich, JJ.
IV 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 24 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the Federal Government should not bail out State and local government employee pension 

plans or other plans that provide post-employment benefits to State 

and local government retirees. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 5, 2017 

Mr. CHAFFETZ submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Education and the Workforce 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that 

the Federal Government should not bail out State and 

local government employee pension plans or other plans 

that provide post-employment benefits to State and local 

government retirees. 

Whereas the Federal Government is operating at an annual 

deficit and is increasing its outstanding debt every year; 

Whereas the Federal Government, as of December 29, 2016, 

is carrying more than $19.879 trillion in debt, of which 

$14.408 trillion is owed to the public and $5.472 trillion 

is owed to Social Security and other trust funds; 

Whereas the Federal Government borrowed 15 cents for 

every dollar it spent in 2016; 


smartinez on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 24 IH 

Whereas foreign governments, individuals, and corporations 

as of October 2016 own 43.1 percent of Federal debt 

held by the public; 

Whereas Social Security’s unfunded liabilities will be $11.4 

trillion by 2090 and $32.1 trillion over the infinite horizon; 

Whereas the Federal debt held by the public is expected to 

increase by more than $9 trillion from fiscal year 2016 

to fiscal year 2026 according to the Congressional Budget Office; 

Whereas State and local governments are heavily dependent 

on Federal revenues; 

Whereas nearly 17 percent of the entire Federal budget goes 

directly to States and local governments; 

Whereas 17 percent of total State and local government general revenue comes from the Federal Government according to Census Bureau’s latest Annual Survey of State 

and Local Government Finance; 

Whereas numerous State and local government employee pension plans have offered overly generous retirement benefits to its employees and are in dire financial situations 

with combined unfunded liabilities of nearly $4 trillion; 

Whereas many State and local government pension plans 

have understated liabilities and overstated asset growth 

rates and have employed methodologies that private sector plans are prohibited from using by Federal law; and 

Whereas several State and local pension plans are expected 

to fully exhaust their funds within ten years: Now, therefore, be it 


smartinez on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 24 IH 

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that— 

3 (1) the Federal Government should not bail out 

4 State and local government employee pension plans 

5 and other post-employment benefit plans; and 

6 (2) State and local governments should imme7 diately institute reforms to their employee pension 

8 plans, including replacing defined benefit plans with 

9 defined contribution plans. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
Order entered March 11, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-01546-CV

OKLAHOMA SURETY COMPANY, Appellant

V.

STEVE NOVIELLO, ASSIGNEE OF METRO TOWNHOMES & HOMES, INC. 

AND METRO TOWNHOMES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, Appellee

On Appeal from the 192nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 10-00335

ORDER

We GRANT appellee’s March 10, 2014 unopposed second motion for an extension of 

time to file a brief. Appellee shall file his brief on or before April 21, 2014. We caution 

appellee that no further extension of time will be granted absent extraordinary circumstances.

/s/ ADA BROWN 

JUSTICE
Version 1.0



Volume 2 (Chapters S-LL) will be issued as separate chapters and available
online.

This report is presented in Portable Document Format.
Adobe Acrobat Reader or similar software is required to view it.
If you wish to download the latest version of Acrobat Reader free of charge,
click here.Screen-optimized PDF file (4.0 MB)

Print-optimized PDF file (4.4 MB)

Text-only PDF file (2.3 KB)
(This version of the bulletin is accessible as defined in Section 508.)

separator barAccessibilityFOIAPrivacyPolicies and NoticesU.S. Department of the Interior | U.S. Geological Survey
      URL: https://pubsdata.usgs.gov/pubs/bul/b2064-ll/
Questions or Assistance: USGS Web Contact
Page Last Modified: Wed Nov 23 11:16 EDT 2016
No. 07-16-00250-CR

Allen ODonald Nash

 Appellant

v.

The State of Texas

 Appellee 

§

§

§

§

From the 9th District Court 

 of Montgomery County

March 29, 2017

Opinion Per Curiam

J U D G M E N T

Pursuant to the opinion of the Court dated March 29, 2017, it is ordered, 

adjudged and decreed that the appeal is abated and the cause is remanded to the 9th 

District Court of Montgomery County, Texas, for further proceedings in accordance with 

this Court’s opinion entered this day.

o O o
#### In re HAMILTON PLACE.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

June 19, 1914.)

In the matter of Hamilton Place.

No opinion. Reference ordered. Order filed.
#### § 601.210 Reporting.

No reporting is required with respect to payments of reasonable compensation made to regularly employed officers or employees of a person.
WaterSense® Labeled 

Toilets 

T

oilets are by far the 

main source of 

water use in the 

home, accounting for 

nearly 30 percent of residential indoor water 

consumption. Toilets also 

happen to be a major 

source of wasted water 

due to leaks and/or 

inefficiency. WaterSense, a program 

sponsored by the U.S. Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA), is helping consumers identify highperformance, water-efficient toilets that can reduce 

water use in the home and help preserve the 

nation’s water resources. 

What Are WaterSense Labeled 

Toilets? 

Recent advancements have allowed toilets to use 20 

percent less water than the current federal standard, 

while still providing equal or superior performance. 

The WaterSense label is used on toilets that are certified by independent laboratory testing to meet rigorous criteria for both performance and efficiency. Only 

high-efficiency toilets that complete the third-party 

certification process can earn the WaterSense label. 

How Much Can WaterSense 

Labeled Toilets Save? 

Over the course of your lifetime, you will likely flush 

the toilet nearly 140,000 times. If you replace older, 

existing toilets with WaterSense labeled models, you 

can save 4,000 gallons per year with this simpler, 

greener choice. 

What About Price? 

WaterSense labeled toilets are available at a wide 

variety of price points and a broad range of styles. 

EPA estimates that a family of four that replaces its 

home’s older toilets with WaterSense labeled models 

will, on average, save more than $90 per year in 

reduced water utility bills, and $2,000 over the lifetime of the toilets. Additionally, in many areas, utilities offer rebates and vouchers that can lower the 

price of a WaterSense labeled toilet. 

And Performance? 

Unlike some first-generation, “low-flow” toilets, 

WaterSense labeled toilets combine high efficiency 

with high performance. Design advances enable 

WaterSense labeled toilets to save water with no 

trade-off in flushing power. In fact, many perform 

better than standard toilets in consumer testing. 

Look for the WaterSense Label! 

Whether remodeling a bathroom, starting construction of a new home, or 

simply replacing an old, leaky toilet 

that is wasting money and water, 

installing a WaterSense labeled toilet is 

a high-performance, water-efficient option worth 

considering. If every American home with older, 

inefficient toilets replaced them with new 

WaterSense labeled toilets, we would save nearly 

640 billion gallons of water per year, equal to more 

than two weeks of flow over Niagara Falls! 

Go to <www.epa.gov/watersense> for more 

information. 

EPA-832-F-06-018 

(866) WTR-SENS (987-7367) · www.epa.gov/watersense · watersense@epa.gov 

February 2008 Recycled/Recyclable—Printed with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on 100% Process Chlorine Free Recycled Paper.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

ANGELA DENISE NAILS, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:06CV737-WKW

) (WO)

DOTHAN RESCUE MISSION, )

)

Defendants. )

ORDER

Upon review of the complaint filed by the pro se plaintiff in this action, the court

concludes that the complaint must be amended before this action may proceed. Plaintiff’s

one paragraph complaint contains a list of broad areas of law which she apparently contends

give her a right to relief. However, the complaint alleges only that plaintiff was denied entry

(for life) into defendant’s homeless shelter. The complaint does not allege sufficient facts

to permit a conclusion that defendant has committed any act which would entitle plaintiff to

judgment. The court is cognizant of its obligation to construe pleadings filed by pro se

litigants liberally. However, the present complaint is not in a form to permit defendant to

frame a response. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that plaintiff is DIRECTED to amend her complaint, on or before

September 6, 2006, to include facts in support of each of her claims and to present each

claim for relief in a separate count. Each count must specifically allege the conduct of the

defendant. Each count may include only one legal theory of relief – i.e., if plaintiff contends

Case 1:06-cv-00737-WKW-SRW Document 4 Filed 08/23/2006 Page 1 of 2
2

that particular actions violated her rights under both the Americans with Disabilities Act and

First Amendment, she must set forth those claims in two separate counts. Each count must

contain all of the factual allegations – and only those factual allegations – which support that

particular claim for relief and may not incorporate previous allegations by reference. Plaintiff

is further DIRECTED to specify the date of any alleged violations of law. For example, if

plaintiff alleges that she was denied service by defendant, she must include the date on which

such denial occurred. Additionally, plaintiff will not be entitled to relief pursuant to 42

U.S.C. § 1983 unless she is able to allege and demonstrate that defendant is acting under

color of state law.

Plaintiff is advised that if she fails to file an amended complaint as set forth above

within the time allowed by the court, the undersigned Magistrate Judge may recommend

dismissal of this action.

DONE, this 23rd day of August, 2006.

/s/ Susan Russ Walker 

SUSAN RUSS WALKER

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00737-WKW-SRW Document 4 Filed 08/23/2006 Page 2 of 2
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

BERTHA ALLEN, #134004, )

)

 Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:06-CV-772-WKW

 )

TALLAPOOSA COUNTY JAIL STAFF, )

 )

 Defendants. )

ORDER ON MOTION

Upon consideration of the motion for defense counsel to resubmit special report filed

by the plaintiff on March 7, 2007 (Court Doc. No. 19), in which the plaintiff seeks a second

copy of the defendants’ written report as she provided her initial copy to a third party while

seeking assistance, and for good cause it is

ORDERED that:

1. This motion be and is hereby DENIED. The plaintiff is advised that she should

seek to gain access to the special report from the third party to whom she provided the report.

If she is unable to regain possession of the report from this individual, the plaintiff is advised

that she may obtain a copy of the report from the Clerk of this Court at a cost of fifty cents

per copy. The special report consists of 19 pages while the exhibits attached to the report

total 64 pages. Thus, to receive copies of all these documents from the Clerk, the plaintiff

must make prepayment of $41.50. If the plaintiff seeks only a copy of the special report

without copies of the attached exhibits, she must make prepayment of $950. 

2. The plaintiff be GRANTED an extension to and including March 22, 2007 to file

Case 3:06-cv-00772-WKW-TFM Document 20 Filed 03/07/2007 Page 1 of 2
2

a response to the defendants' special report. 

Done this 7th day of March, 2007.

 /s/ Terry F. Moorer 

TERRY F. MOORER 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-00772-WKW-TFM Document 20 Filed 03/07/2007 Page 2 of 2
Editorial Note on Part 61
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 61 appear at 80 FR 74980, Dec. 1, 2015, and at 81 FR 86909, Dec. 2, 2016.

§ 61.14 Institutional information. The institutional information must include: ( a ) A certification by the Federal or State government which owns the disposal site that the Federal or State government is prepared to accept transfer of the license when the provisions of § 61.30 are met, and will assume responsibility for custodial care after site closure and postclosure observation and maintenance.
( b ) Where the proposed disposal site is on land not owned by the Federal or a State government, the applicant must submit evidence that arrangements have been made for assumption of ownership in fee by the Federal or a State government before the Commission issues a license.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7200 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7200

    To extend indemnity for wildfires and hurricanes, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 29, 2018

 Mr. Austin Scott of Georgia introduced the following bill; which was 
                referred to the Committee on Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To extend indemnity for wildfires and hurricanes, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Wildfires and Hurricanes Indemnity 
Program Extension Act of 2018''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION.

    Title I of subdivision 1 of division B of the Bipartisan Budget Act 
of 2018 (Public Law 115-123) is amended under the heading ``Department 
of Agriculture--Agricultural Programs--Processing, Research and 
Marketing--Office of the Secretary''--
            (1) by striking ``December 31, 2019'' and inserting 
        ``December 31, 2020'';
            (2) by inserting ``Florence, Michael,'' after ``Maria,''; 
        and
            (3) by inserting ``or 2018'' after ``occurring in calendar 
        year 2017''.
                                 <all>
```
#### HALL, Respondent, v. MOORE REALTY CO., Appellant et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

June 26, 1914.)

Action by Margaret Hall against the Moore Realty Company, impleaded with others.

C. E. Meier, for appellant.

No opinion. Judgment modified, by reducing the amount adjudged to be due to the plaintiff by the sum of $408, and, as so modified, affirmed, without costs. Settle order on notice.
§ 60.3 License required. ( a ) DOE shall not receive or possess source, special nuclear, or byproduct material at a geologic repository operations area except as authorized by a license issued by the Commission pursuant to this part.
( b ) DOE shall not commence construction of a geologic repository operations area unless it has filed an application with the Commission and has obtained construction authorization as provided in this part. Failure to comply with this requirement shall be grounds for denial of a license.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsBOREAS TE-5 CO2 Concentration and Stable Isotope CompositionThe BOREAS TE-5 team collected measurements in the NSA and SSA on gas exchange, gas composition, and tree growth. This data set contains measurements of the concentration and stable carbon (C-13/C-12 and oxygen (O-18/O-16) isotope ratios of atmospheric CO2 in air samples collected at different heights within forest canopies. The data were collected to determine the influence of photosynthesis and respiration by the forest ecosystems on the concentration and stable isotope ratio of atmospheric CO2 These measurements were collected at the SSA during each 1994 IFC at OJP, OBS, and OA sites. Measurements were also collected at the NSA during each 1994 IFC at the OJP, T6R5S TE UBS, and T2Q6A TE OA sites. The stable isotope ratios are expressed using standard delta notation and in units of per mil. The isotope ratios are expressed relative to the international standard, PDB, for both carbon and oxygen samples. The data are stored in tabular ASCII files. The data files are available on a CD-ROM (see document number 20010000884), or from the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) Distributed Activity Archive Center (DAAC).Document ID20010005748Acquisition SourceGoddard Space Flight CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsHall, Forrest G.*(NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt, MD United States)*Curd, Shelaine*(Raytheon Information Technology and Scientific Services Greenbelt, MD United States)*Ehleriinger, Jim*(Utah Univ. Salt Lake City, UT United States)*Brooks, J. Renee*(University of South Florida Tampa, FL United States)*Flanagan, Larry*(Lethbridge Univ. Lethbridge, Alberta Canada)*Date AcquiredSeptember 7, 2013Publication DateOctober 1, 2000Subject CategoryEarth Resources And Remote SensingReport/Patent NumberRept-2000-03136-0/VOL136NASA/TM-2000-209891/VOL136NAS 1.15:209891/VOL136Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 462-33-01Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20010005748.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
PGI 239.7603 Procedures.

PGI 239.7603-1 General.

PGI 239.7603-2 Notification of third party access requests.

PGI 239.7603-3 Cyber incident and compromise reporting.

PGI 239.7603-4 DoD damage assessment activities.

Parent topic: PGI 239.76 -CLOUD COMPUTING
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

JEROME TITA,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D18-3019

[March 21, 2019]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Bernard I. Bober, 

Judge; L.T. Case No. 09-5390CF10A.

Robert D. Devin of Robert D. Devin, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

No appearance for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GROSS, MAY and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### § 50.23 Construction permits.

A construction permit for the construction of a production or utilization facility will be issued before the issuance of a license if the application is otherwise acceptable, and will be converted upon completion of the facility and Commission action, into a license as provided in § 50.56. However, if a combined license for a nuclear power reactor is issued under part 52 of this chapter, the construction permit and operating license are deemed to be combined in a single license. A construction permit for the alteration of a production or utilization facility will be issued before the issuance of an amendment of a license, if the application for amendment is otherwise acceptable, as provided in § 50.92.

[72 FR 49490, Aug. 28, 2007, as amended at 81 FR 86909, Dec. 2, 2016]
223 So.2d 875

#### STATE of Louisiana v. George MAILHOS.

No. 49981.

July 7, 1969.

In re: George Mailhos applying for writs of prohibition, mandamus and certiorari.

The application is denied. It is not our •understanding that the jurisprudence of the United States Supreme Court has been extended to cases of this nature. Hence the trial judge correctly denied the application for habeas corpus.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AND INCOME STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           2,710
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,588
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      6,976
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                15,901
<PP&E>                                             620
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  16,641
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           41,362
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     30,000
<COMMON>                                           669
<OTHER-SE>                                     111,145
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    16,641
<SALES>                                         18,260
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                18,260
<CGS>                                           16,300
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,595
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 303
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     62
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 62
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        62
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.01)
        

</TABLE>