alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case 2:06-cv-00739-LES-CSC Document 1-3 Filed 08/16/2006 Page 1 of 18
Case 2:06-cv-00739-LES-CSC Document 1-3 Filed 08/16/2006 Page 2 of 18
Case 2:06-cv-00739-LES-CSC Document 1-3 Filed 08/16/2006 Page 3 of 18
Case 2:06-cv-00739-LES-CSC Document 1-3 Filed 08/16/2006 Page 4 of 18
Case 2:06-cv-00739-LES-CSC Document 1-3 Filed 08/16/2006 Page 5 of 18
Case 2:06-cv-00739-LES-CSC Document 1-3 Filed 08/16/2006 Page 6 of 18
Case 2:06-cv-00739-LES-CSC Document 1-3 Filed 08/16/2006 Page 7 of 18
Case 2:06-cv-00739-LES-CSC Document 1-3 Filed 08/16/2006 Page 8 of 18
Case 2:06-cv-00739-LES-CSC Document 1-3 Filed 08/16/2006 Page 9 of 18
Case 2:06-cv-00739-LES-CSC Document 1-3 Filed 08/16/2006 Page 10 of 18
Case 2:06-cv-00739-LES-CSC Document 1-3 Filed 08/16/2006 Page 11 of 18
Case 2:06-cv-00739-LES-CSC Document 1-3 Filed 08/16/2006 Page 12 of 18
Case 2:06-cv-00739-LES-CSC Document 1-3 Filed 08/16/2006 Page 13 of 18
Case 2:06-cv-00739-LES-CSC Document 1-3 Filed 08/16/2006 Page 14 of 18
Case 2:06-cv-00739-LES-CSC Document 1-3 Filed 08/16/2006 Page 15 of 18
Case 2:06-cv-00739-LES-CSC Document 1-3 Filed 08/16/2006 Page 16 of 18
Case 2:06-cv-00739-LES-CSC Document 1-3 Filed 08/16/2006 Page 17 of 18
Case 2:06-cv-00739-LES-CSC Document 1-3 Filed 08/16/2006 Page 18 of 18
IV 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 47 

Urging a peaceful resolution of the conflict over Kashmir, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 25, 2005 

Mr. PITTS submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on International Relations 

RESOLUTION 

Urging a peaceful resolution of the conflict over Kashmir, 

and for other purposes. 

Whereas the conflict over Kashmir began in 1947 after colonial partition of the region; 

Whereas United Nations Security Council Resolution 47 of 

April 21, 1948, called for the holding of a plebiscite for 

the people of Kashmir; 

Whereas numerous human rights reports detail the extensive 

suffering of the Kashmiri people at the hands of security 

forces, militias, paramilitary forces, and militants; 

Whereas the peoples of Kashmir, India, and Pakistan have 

suffered tremendous loss of life over the last 14 years 

from the violence in the conflict over Kashmir, including 

the deaths of approximately 60,000 people; 
2 

•HRES 47 IH 

Whereas reports suggest that Kashmiri territory has been 

used by militants who seek to destabilize the region, including India and Pakistan; 

Whereas the unresolved conflict over Kashmir brings instability to South Asia, particularly as Pakistan and India 

continue to build their weapons capabilities; 

Whereas the governments of India and Pakistan agreed upon 

a cease-fire in November of 2003, and then took commendable steps to build bridges between the two nations 

by reopening air and bus routes and through other confidence-building measures; 

Whereas in February of 2004, the governments of India and 

Pakistan agreed upon a basic road map for peace negotiations to facilitate their conflict over Kashmir and the 

peace process; and 

Whereas the designation of a Special Envoy by the United 

States to help resolve the issues relating to Kashmir 

would signify the importance of the region and issues to 

United States and international security and stability: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) urges all parties involved to find a peaceful 

3 resolution of the conflict over Kashmir; 

4 (2) commends the governments of India and 

5 Pakistan for the November 2003 cease-fire agree6 ment, ongoing dialogue, the agreement on the basic 

7 road map for peace negotiations, and confidence 

8 building measures to promote peace; 
3 

•HRES 47 IH 

1 (3) commends nongovernmental and humani2 tarian organizations for their work on communal 

3 peace and reconciliation and on building civil society 

4 in Kashmir; 

5 (4) urges the governments of India and Paki6 stan to include Kashmiri leaders in the dialogue and 

7 constructive engagement regarding Kashmir; and 

8 (5) urges the President to appoint immediately 

9 a Special Envoy to work with the governments and 

10 peoples of India, Pakistan, and Kashmir in order to 

11 support further dialogue, negotiations, and a resolu12 tion of the conflict over Kashmir. 

Æ
§ 60.47 Facility information and verification. ( a ) In response to a written request by the Commission, each applicant for a construction authorization or license and each recipient of a construction authorization or a license shall submit facility information, as described in § 75.10 of this chapter, on IAEA Design Information Questionnaire forms, and site information on DOC/NRC Form AP-A and associated forms;
( b ) As required by the Additional Protocol, applicants and licensees specified in paragraph (a) of this section shall submit location information described in § 75.11 of this chapter on DOC/NRC Form AP-1 and associated forms;
( c ) Shall permit verification thereof by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and take other action as necessary to implement the US/IAEA Safeguards Agreement, as described in part 75 of this chapter.
[73 FR 78605, Dec. 23, 2008, as amended at 85 FR 65663, Oct. 16, 2020]
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000812076
<NAME>                        TOPPS
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Mar-03-2001
<PERIOD-START>                                 Aug-27-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   Nov-25-2000
<CASH>                                         152,858
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   22,490
<ALLOWANCES>                                     3,155
<INVENTORY>                                     20,451
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               207,924
<PP&E>                                          18,916
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,814
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 277,940
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           78,504
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                           483
<OTHER-SE>                                     0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   277,940
<SALES>                                         92,700
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                94,557
<CGS>                                           45,182
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   68,079
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    50
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  49
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 26,429
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,548
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             18,881
<DISCONTINUED>                                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 0
<CHANGES>                                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                    18,881
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .42
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .41



</TABLE>
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended
      March 31, 2006 (the “Report”) of Patient Safety Technologies, Inc. (the
“Registrant”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
      hereof, I, William B. Horne, as the Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge,
      that:





(1)
      the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)
      the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Registrant.











Dated:
                May 19, 2006
            /s/
                William B.
                HorneWilliam
                B. HorneChief
                Financial Officer








A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-17-00243-CV

IN RE John M. DONOHUE

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Delivered and Filed: April 26, 2017

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

On April 19, 2017, Relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. The court has considered 

the petition for writ of mandamus and is of the opinion that Relator is not entitled to the relief 

sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).

PER CURIAM

 1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2017CI04327, styled Ex Parte John M. Donohue, pending in the 37th 

Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Ron Rangel presiding.
#### Frank T. Twitchell et al., Plaintiffs, v Town of Pittsford, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant. Pittsford Central School District, Third-Party Defendant-Respondent. (And Another Action.)

Order unanimously affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: CPLR 3025 (subd [b]) permits amendment of pleadings at any time by leave of court and directs that leave be freely given. It is well settled that the statute should be liberally construed and amendment should be granted absent laches, undue prejudice or unfair advantage. Liberality does not, however, require courts to permit futile amendments *(Citibank [N. Y. State], N. A. v Suthers,*68 AD2d 790). On this appeal the third-party plaintiff asserts such futility but at Special Term it submitted no pleading in opposition to the motion to amend made by the third-party defendant. Thus the futility issue is not *587before us on this appeal. The third-party defendant’s motion under CPLR 3025 (subd [b]) to amend its answer by asserting certain agreements between the parties was proper and Special Term did not abuse its discretion in granting the motion. (Appeal from order of Monroe Supreme Court—amend complaint.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Schnepp, Callahan, Doerr and Witmer, JJ.
H. Res. 396 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

June 22, 2017. 

Resolved, That at any time after adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XVIII, 

declare the House resolved into the Committee of the Whole 

House on the state of the Union for consideration of the bill 

(H.R. 2842) to provide for the conduct of demonstration 

projects to test the effectiveness of subsidized employment for 

TANF recipients. The first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. All points of order against consideration of the 

bill are waived. General debate shall be confined to the bill 

and shall not exceed one hour equally divided and controlled 

by the chair and ranking minority member of the Committee 

on Ways and Means. After general debate the bill shall be 

considered for amendment under the five-minute rule. In lieu 

of the amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended 

by the Committee on Ways and Means now printed in the 

bill, it shall be in order to consider as an original bill for the 

purpose of amendment under the five-minute rule an amendment in the nature of a substitute consisting of the text of 
2 

•HRES 396 EH 

Rules Committee Print 115–22. That amendment in the nature of a substitute shall be considered as read. All points of 

order against that amendment in the nature of a substitute 

are waived. No amendment to that amendment in the nature 

of a substitute shall be in order except those printed in the 

report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution. Each such amendment may be offered only in the order 

printed in the report, may be offered only by a Member designated in the report, shall be considered as read, shall be debatable for the time specified in the report equally divided 

and controlled by the proponent and an opponent, shall not 

be subject to amendment, and shall not be subject to a demand for division of the question in the House or in the 

Committee of the Whole. All points of order against such 

amendments are waived. At the conclusion of consideration of 

the bill for amendment the Committee shall rise and report 

the bill to the House with such amendments as may have 

been adopted. Any Member may demand a separate vote in 

the House on any amendment adopted in the Committee of 

the Whole to the bill or to the amendment in the nature of 

a substitute made in order as original text. The previous 

question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and 

amendments thereto to final passage without intervening motion except one motion to recommit with or without instructions. 
3 

•HRES 396 EH 

SEC. 2. It shall be in order at any time on the legislative 

day of June 22, 2017, for the Speaker to entertain motions 

that the House suspend the rules, as though under clause 1 

of rule XV, relating to the bill (H.R. 2353) to reauthorize the 

Carl D. Perkins Career and Technical Education Act of 

2006. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
#### § 920.67 Agents.

The Secretary may, by designation in writing, name any officer or employee of the United States, or name any agency or division in the United States Department of Agriculture, to act as the Secretary's agent or representative in connection with any of the provisions of this part.
H. Res. 623

In the House of Representatives, U.S., 

December 17, 2005.

Resolved, That it shall be in order at any time on the 

legislative day of Saturday, December 17, 2005, for the 

Speaker to entertain motions that the House suspend the 

rules relating to the following measures: 

(1) The bill (H.R. 4519) to amend the Public Health 

Service Act to extend funding for the operation of State high 

risk health insurance pools. 

(2) The bill (H.R. 2520) to provide for the collection and 

maintenance of human cord blood stem cells for the treatment of patients and research, and to amend the Public 

Health Service Act to authorize the C. W. Bill Young Cell 

Transplantation Program. 

(3) The bill (H.R. 4568) to improve proficiency testing 

of clinical laboratories. 

(4) The bill (H.R. 3402) to authorize appropriations for 

the Department of Justice for fiscal years 2006 through 

2009, and for other purposes. 
2

•HRES 623 EH 

(5) The bill (H.R. 4579) to amend title I of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, title XXVII 

of the Public Health Service Act, and the Internal Revenue 

Code of 1986 to extend by one year provisions requiring parity in the application of certain limits to mental health benefits. 

(6) The bill (H.R. 4525) to temporarily extend the programs under the Higher Education Act of 1965, and for 

other purposes. 

(7) The conference report to accompany the bill (S. 

1281) to reauthorize the human space flight, aeronautics, and 

science programs of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, and for other purposes. 

(8) The bill (S. 467) to extend the applicability of the 

Terrorism Risk Insurance Act of 2002. 

(9) A joint resolution making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2006, and for other purposes. 

Attest:

Clerk.
CASE ANNOUNCEMENTS

*January 25, 2008*

[Cite as *01/25/2008 Case Announcements,*2008-0hio-241.]

MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS

2008-0160.

#### McAllister v. Smith.

Marion App. No. 9-07-45. This cause was filed as a discretionary appeal and claimed appeal of right. Upon consideration of appellant’s jurisdictional memorandum, it is determined by the court that this cause originated in the court of appeals and should proceed as an appeal of right pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. II(1)(A)(1).

It is ordered by the court that the Clerk shall issue an order for the transmission of the record from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County, and the parties shall brief this case in accordance with S.Ct.Prac.R. VI.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

vs. ) Case No. 2:06CR200-WHA

)

HECTOR R. SILVER )

ORDER

Upon consideration of the motion to withdraw (doc. # 49) and Matthew Patrick

Teague’s notice of appearance for the defendant, it is

ORDERED that the motion to withdraw be and is hereby GRANTED.

Done this 26 day of September, 2006. th

 /s/Charles S. Coody 

CHARLES S. COODY

CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:06-cr-00200-WHA-CSC Document 55 Filed 09/26/2006 Page 1 of 1
#### In the Matter of William S. Davis, Petitioner. Westchester County Bar Association (Grievance Committee for the Ninth Judicial District), Respondent.

Application by petitioner, who was disbarred by this court’s order dated January 7,1963, under the name W. Scott Davis, for reinstatement as an attorney and counselor at law. By order, dated February 26, 1980, this court referred the matter to the Committee on Character and Fitness, to investigate, hear and report; the application was held in abeyance, pending receipt of said report. The Committee on Character and Fitness has rendered its report and finds that petitioner presently possesses the requisite character and fitness for an attorney and counsel at law and recommends that petitioner be reinstated as an attorney and counselor at law. The report and recommendation of the Character Committee are accepted and confirmed; motion for reinstatement granted and the clerk of this court is directed to restore the petitioner, William S. Davis, to the roll of attorneys and counselors at law forthwith. Mollen, P. J., Hopkins, Damiani, Titone and O’Connor, JJ., concur.
Editorial Note on Part 63
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 63 appear at 81 FR 86909, Dec. 2, 2016.

§ 63.171 Violations. ( a ) The Commission may obtain an injunction or other court order to prevent a violation of the provisions of— ( 1 ) The Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended;
( 2 ) Title II of the Energy Reorganization Act of 1974, as amended; or
( 3 ) A regulation or order issued under those Acts.
( b ) The Commission may obtain a court order for the payment of a civil penalty imposed under section 234 of the Atomic Energy Act: ( 1 ) For violations of— ( i ) Sections 53, 57, 62, 63, 81, 82, 101, 103, 104, 107, or 109 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended;
( ii ) Section 206 of the Energy Reorganization Act;
( iii ) Any rule, regulation, or order issued under the sections specified in paragraph (b)(1)(i) of this section;
( iv ) Any term, condition, or limitation of any license issued under the sections specified in paragraph (b)(1)(i) of this section.
( 2 ) For any violation for which a license may be revoked under section 186 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended.
Subpart 5637.1 - SERVICE CONTRACTS

GENERAL

Parent topic: Part 5637 - SERVICE CONTRACTING

5637.102 Policy.

(Revised August 2016)

(a) See 5609.901 for Guidance on Contractors in the Federal Workplace.

(b) Acquisition of Services shall be in accordance with DoD Instruction 5000.74. The Senior Services

Manager (SSM) for USSOCOM has delegated the decision authority for Service Category V

acquisitions (estimated total value of the SAT or more but less than $10M) to the Component and

Theater Special Operations Command (TSOC) level, unless otherwise directed. Components and

TSOC contracting offices shall ensure requiring activities obtain service acquisition approval IAW

local procedures. The contract file shall contain the approved acquisition strategy.

(1) To ensure effective management, planning, and execution of services acquisitions at the

Component/TSOC level, SOF AT&L-KM will pull quarterly reports for submission to PEO-SV. As part

of the oversight in services acquisitions for USSOCOM, the SSM or designee may participate in

milestone decision briefs, execution reviews, and/or Procurement Management Reviews.

5637.103-90 Contracting Officer Responsibility.

(Revised August 2016)

See FAR 37.103(e) for reporting requirements.

5637.104 Personal Service Contracts.

(b)(1) If a request for approval of a personal service contract is submitted in accordance with DFARS

237.104(b)( i ) , the following additional information shall be furnished:

(a) The requiring activity's initial request signed by the Requiring Activity Official (RAO);

(b) A determination and findings (D&F);

(c) A review sheet coordinated in accordance with Attachment 5601-1 ;

(d) Documentation of Contracting Officer coordination; and

(e) A narrative requesting the approval authority signs the required D&F.
5637.110 Solicitation Provisions and Contract Clauses.

(Revised August 2017)

(a) (Removed August 2017).

(b) When a service contract Statement of Work (SOW) contains key personnel, contracting officers

may insert a clause substantially the same as 5652.237-9001 , Key Personnel Requirements.

5637.170 Approval of contracts and task orders for services.

(Revised April 2015)

See DCG for service requirement (SR) approval and reporting policy and responsibilities.

5637.170-2 Approval Requirements.

(Revised October 2015)

Contracts or task orders valued at or below $93 million that are not performance-based must be

approved by an HCD or FCO Chief. For acquisitions exceeding $93 million, obtain the approval of

the senior procurement executive.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                       8,675,850
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  962,237
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,345,543
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            80,860,934
<PP&E>                                      78,393,377
<DEPRECIATION>                              20,781,013
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             140,312,130
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      146,212,578
<BONDS>                                     43,531,502
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                 25,847,472
<COMMON>                                        61,954
<OTHER-SE>                               (126,767,106)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               140,312,130
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           101,051,389
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               57,181,506
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            32,057,793
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          16,869,374
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              7,041,325
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (5,057,284)
<DISCONTINUED>                              12,098,609
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              2,786,308
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 9,827,633
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.31
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.31


</TABLE>