alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

OFFICE OF THE CLERK

POST OFFICE BOX 711

MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA 36101-0711

DEBRA P. HACKETT, CLERK

TELEPHONE (334) 954-3600

January 5, 2007

 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT

To: All Counsel of Record

Re: Burkett v. McCray et al 

Civil Action No. 1:06-cv-00775-DRB

The above-styled case has been reassigned to Judge Terry F. Moorer.

Please note that the case number is now 1:06-cv-00775-TFM. 

This new case number should be used on all future correspondence and pleadings in this

action.

 

Case 1:06-cv-00775-TFM Document 40 Filed 01/05/2007 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000812076                         
<NAME>                        TOPPS
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              FEB-27-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   AUG-29-1998
<CASH>                                              39,020
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       32,441   
<ALLOWANCES>                                         1,305
<INVENTORY>                                         14,132
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    95,127
<PP&E>                                              13,245
<DEPRECIATION>                                       5,163
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     167,947
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               73,017
<BONDS>                                              9,375
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  475
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                               0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       167,947
<SALES>                                             57,868
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    60,988
<CGS>                                               32,563
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       51,839
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       110
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      8,442
<INCOME-TAX>                                         3,629
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  4,813
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0  
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                         4,813
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          .10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          .10
        


</TABLE>
#### In re GARTNER.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

May 29, 1914.)

In the matter of the application of Julius Gartner for a peremptory writ of mandamus, etc.

No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.
#### § 925.3 Person.

*Person* means an individual, partnership, corporation, association, or any other business unit.
#### In the Matter of Le Roy Hodge, an Attorney, Respondent. New York State Bar Association, Petitioner.

Application, pursuant to section 90 of the Judiciary Law, to be reinstated as an attorney and counselor at law granted. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds, Staley, Jr., and Cooke, JJ., concur.
#### § 605.1 Purpose and scope.

This part sets forth the policies and procedures applicable to the award and administration of grants and cooperative agreements by the DOE Office of Science (SC) for basic and applied research, educational and/or training activities, conferences and related activities.

[57 FR 40583, Sept. 3, 1992, as amended at 79 FR 76046, Dec. 19, 2014]
### Open-File Report 97-489

Compiled by E. E. Brabb

Digital Database Prepared by S. Graham, C. Wentworth, D. Knifong, R. Graymer and J. Blissenbach

---



### 1. Documentation files

A. Download individual documentation files:





---



### 2. Geologic map database (spatial and attribute  GIS) files:

A. Download all the geologic database layers and supporting materials in ARC/INFO 7.x ASCII EXPORT format, and all of the documentation files, packaged in a single UNIX tar file, compressed with gzip:

#### - OR -

Geologic layers:







Utilities (AMLs) for ARC/INFO users - import.aml



---

### 3. Geologic map cartographic (plottable Postscript and PDF) files:







---

| | For more information on the geologyof the San Francisco Bay region:Visit the sfgeo website
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Raphael P. Kenel, Now Known as Father Patrick Kenel, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously modified on the law and facts by reducing sentence to the time already served by defendant and as so modified judgment affirmed. Memorandum: In our opinion the sentence imposed upon defendant was excessive. In the interests of justice the sentence should be reduced to the time already served and defendant discharged. (Appeal from judgment of Chautauqua County Court, convicting defendant of injury to property.) Present — Goldman, P. J., Del Veeehio, Gabrielli, Moule and Henry, JJ.
Superintendent of Documents Subscription Order Form
Order Processing Code
* 8305

YES, enter my subscription(s) as follows:

Subscription to the List of Materials Acceptable for

Use of Systems of RUS Electrification Borrowers

(IP. 202-1), (LOMA) for $38.00 domestic and $47.50 for
foreign

The total cost of my order is $. . Price includes regular shipping, and
handling, and is subject to change. International customers please add 25%.

‘Company or personal name (Please type or print) Charge
your

Additional address/attention line order,
It's

Street address easy!

City, State, Zip code

Daytime phone including area code

Purchase order number (optional)

For privacy protection, check below: tox
____Do not make my name available to other mailers To fax
Your orders
Check method of payment (202) 512-2250
Check payable to Superintendent of Documents

—— GPO Deposit Account CIT TTT] —_— im
___ VISA ___ MasterCard
LETTTITTITTTTTiT tT tty tit
LETT] (expiration date)

Thank you for

Your order!

Authorizing signature 8/99

Mail To: Superintendent of Documents
P.O. Box 371954, Pittsburgh, PA 15250-7954
#### § 71.113 Document control.

The licensee, certificate holder, and applicant for a CoC shall establish measures to control the issuance of documents such as instructions, procedures, and drawings, including changes, that prescribe all activities affecting quality. These measures must assure that documents, including changes, are reviewed for adequacy, approved for release by authorized personnel, and distributed and used at the location where the prescribed activity is performed.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v.

JOHN HENRY SCHNEIDER,

Defendant

- Appellant. No. 18

- 30187

D.C. No. 1:17

- cr

- 00077

- SPW

- 1

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Montana

Susan P. Watters, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted July 15, 2019 **

Before: SCHROEDER, SILVERMAN, and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges.

John Henry Schneider appeals from the district court’s judgment and

challenges the 24

- month sentence imposed following his guilty

- plea conviction for

concealment of bankruptcy assets , in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 152(1). We hav e

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Schneider’s request for oral

argument is , therefore, denied. 

# FILED

JUL 17 2019

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 18

- 30187

Schneider argues that trial counsel was constitutionally ineffective at

sentencing f

or failing to object t o (1) the loss calculation under U.S.S.G. § 2 B 1.1;

(2) the introduction and content of victim impact statements ; and ( 3) the district

court’s alleged failure to properly consider and weigh the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)

sentencing factors

. We decline to address these claim s on direct appeal because

the record is insufficiently developed to permit determination of the issues , and

Schneider’s legal representation was not so inadequate that it obviously denied him

his Sixth Amendment right to counsel. See United States v. Rahm an

, 642 F.3d

1257

, 1259

- 60 (9th Cir. 20 11 ).

We decline to reach Schneider’s additional claims because he did not

specifically and distinctly raise and argue those issues in his opening brief. See

Padgett v. Wright , 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).

A FFIRMED.
PGI 208.7304 Refined precious metals.       The following refined precious metals are currently managed by DSCP:          Precious Metal                      National Stock Number (NSN)Gold                      9660-00-042-7733Silver                      9660-00-106-9432Platinum Granules                      9660-00-042-7768Platinum Sponge                      9660-00-151-4050Palladium Granules                      9660-00-042-7765Palladium Sponge                      9660-01-039-0320Rhodium                      9660-01-010-2625Iridium                      9660-00-011-1937Ruthenium                      9660-01-039-0313    **Parent topic:** PGI 208.73 -USE OF GOVERNMENT-OWNED PRECIOUS METALS
Sanitized – Attachment 019

Page 1 of 1
NotesFAQContact Us

Collection

Thesaurus
AdvancedSearch Tips

Collection

Thesaurus
BrowseThesaurus

 Download full text

**ERIC Number:**

**Record Type:**

**Publication Date:**

**Pages:**

**Abstractor:**

**ISBN:**

**ISSN:**

**EISSN:**

Community CollegesEducation Work RelationshipEducational ChangeEducational InnovationGeneral EducationIntegrated CurriculumInterdisciplinary ApproachJob TrainingProgram ImplementationTechnical InstitutesTwo Year CollegesVocational Education

**Publication Type:**

**Education Level:**

**Audience:**

**Language:**

**Sponsor:**

**Authoring Institution:**

**Grant or Contract Numbers:**

PrivacyCopyrightContact UsSelection PolicyAPI
JournalsNon-JournalsDownloadSubmitMultimediaWidget
§ 150.32 Funds for reclamation or maintenance of byproduct material. ( a ) The total amount of funds an Agreement State collects, pursuant to a license for byproduct material as defined in § 150.3(c)(2) of this part or for any activity that results in the production of such material, for reclamation or long term maintenance and monitoring of such material, shall after November 8, 1981, be transferred to the United States if title and custody of such material and its disposal site is transferred to the United States upon termination of such license. Such funds include, but are not limited to, sums collected for long term surveillance (*i.e.*, continued site observation, monitoring and, where necessary, maintenance). Such funds do not however, include monies held as surety where no default has occurred and the reclamation or other bonded activity has been performed.
( b ) If an Agreement State requires such payments for reclamation or long term surveillance (*i.e.*, continued site observation, monitoring and, where necessary, maintenance), the payments must, after November 8, 1981, be sufficient to ensure compliance with those standards established by the Commission pertaining to bonds, sureties, and financial arrangements to ensure adequate reclamation and long term management of such byproduct material and its disposal site.
[45 FR 65537, Oct. 3, 1980; 48 FR 40882, Sept. 12, 1983]
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 663 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 663

 Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to prohibit former 
 Members and former officers of the House who are registered lobbyists 
    from admission to the Hall of the House, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 31, 2006

 Mr. Snyder submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
   the Committee on Rules, and in addition to the Committee on House 
   Administration, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 
  Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 
           within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to prohibit former 
 Members and former officers of the House who are registered lobbyists 
    from admission to the Hall of the House, and for other purposes.

    Resolved, That clause 4(a) of rule IV of the Rules of the House of 
Representatives is amended by striking ``and'' at the end of 
subparagraph (1), by striking the period at the end of subparagraph (2) 
and inserting ``; and'', and by adding at the end the following new 
subparagraph:
            ``(3) they are not registered lobbyists.''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITING ADDITIONAL ACCESS TO HOUSE SERVICES FOR LOBBYISTS 
              WHO ARE FORMER MEMBERS.

    (a) In General.--Any services which are made available by the House 
of Representatives exclusively to Members, officers, and employees of 
the House of Representatives and former Members of the House of 
Representatives, including access to facilities in House office 
buildings which are operated for the exclusive use of Members and 
former Members, may not be made available or provided to any former 
Member who is a lobbyist registered under the Federal Regulation of 
Lobbying Act or any successor statute except to the extent that such 
services are made available by the House to lobbyists registered under 
such Act who are not former Members. For purposes of this section, the 
term ``Member of the House of Representatives'' includes a Delegate or 
Resident Commissioner to the Congress.
    (b) Regulations.--The Committee on House Administration shall 
promulgate regulations to carry out this section.
                                 <all>
```
Index

Parent topic: Attachment 5601-2 Table Of Contents
Page 1 of 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR

THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

FARMERS TELECOMMUNICATIONS )

COOPERATIVE, INC., )

 )

Plaintiff, )

 )

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:06cv790-WC

 )

VERIZON BUSINESS NETWORK )

SERVICES INC., et al., )

 )

Defendants. )

ORDER

Upon of review of Defendant/Cross-claim Defendant Qwest Communications

Corporation's Motion to Amend its Answer to the Amended Cross-Claim (Doc. #53), filed

October 2, 2007, it is

ORDERED the motion be submitted without oral argument on October 17, 2007.

It is further 

ORDERED that Verizon Business Network Services, Inc. and Farmers

Telecommunications Cooperative, Inc. file a response on or before October 17, 2007. 

DONE this 3rd day of October, 2007.

 /s/ Wallace Capel, Jr.

WALLACE CAPEL, JR.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00790-WC Document 55 Filed 10/03/2007 Page 1 of 1
§ 71.129 Inspection, test, and operating status. ( a ) The licensee, certificate holder, and applicant for a CoC shall establish measures to indicate, by the use of markings such as stamps, tags, labels, routing cards, or other suitable means, the status of inspections and tests performed upon individual items of the packaging. These measures must provide for the identification of items that have satisfactorily passed required inspections and tests, where necessary to preclude inadvertent bypassing of the inspections and tests.
( b ) The licensee shall establish measures to identify the operating status of components of the packaging, such as tagging valves and switches, to prevent inadvertent operation.
835.010 Scientific and technical reports.

The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 852.235-75, Scientific and Technical Reports, in all

research and development (R&D) solicitations and contracts.

Parent topic: PART 835 - RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CONTRACTING
DISMISS and Opinion Filed July 26, 2016 

# S

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-16-00484-CV
RICHARD D. YOUNG, Appellant V. ROBIN GIBBS AND KARL ADAMS, Appellees
On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC-16-01463-E



### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Wright a nd Justices Bridges and Lang Opinion by Justice Bridges The Dallas County Clerk’s office informed th is Court that it would not be filing the clerk’s record because appellant had filed with the trial court a document entitled “Defendant’s Notice to Withdraw Appeal.” By letter dated June 27, 2016, we instructed appellant to file, by July 5, 2016, either written verification that he has requested preparation of the clerk’s record or a motion to dismiss the appeal. We cautioned appe llant that failure to comply with the Court’s instructions may result in dismissal of the appeal without further notice. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 37.3(b), 42.3(b), (c). As of toda y’s date, appellant has not comp lied. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 37.3(b), 42.3(b), (c).

160484F.P05 /David L. Bridges/ DAVID L. BRIDGES JUSTICE–2– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
JUDGMENT

RICHARD D. YOUNG, Appellant

No. 05-16-00484-CV V.

ROBIN GIBBS AND KARL ADAMS, Appellees On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC-16-01463-E. Opinion delivered by Justice Bridges. Chief Justice Wright and Justice Lang participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opi nion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED

.
It is ORDERED that appellees ROBIN GIBBS AND KARL ADAMS recover their costs of this appeal from appe llant RICHARD D. YOUNG.

Judgment entered July 26, 2016.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                       1,889,764
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,889,764
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,889,764
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          349,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,540,764
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,540,764
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                27,827
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   77,716
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                (49,889)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (49,889)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.20)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
U.S. Department of TransportationFederal Highway Administration
        1200 New Jersey Avenue, SEWashington, DC 20590
        202-366-4000


About
		
	 
FHWA Organization
   	Headquarters Offices
    Field Offices
    Careers
    Strategic Plan
    Business Opportunities
    Staff Directories
    Highway History
	Programs
		
	 
Acquisition Management
	
	Civil Rights
	Federal Lands Highway
    Infrastructure
    Innovative Program Delivery
    Operations
    Planning, Environment, and Realty
    Policy
    Research, Development & Technology
    Safety
    Browse by Topics
	Resources
		
			 
Core Highway Topics
  Federal-Aid Essentials
  Automation
  Complete Streets
  Publications & Statistics
  Laws & Regulations
  Policy & Guidance Center
  Section 508
  Professional Development
  National Highway Institute (NHI)
  Resource Center
  Accessibility Resource Library
  FHWA Research Library
	Briefing Room
	 
	 
Press Releases
	Speeches & Testimony
    Photos
    Videos
    Media Contacts
	Contact
	
	Search FHWA


**Federal Highway Administration Research and Technology**Coordinating, Developing, and Delivering Highway Transportation Innovations


Report**This report is an archived publication and may contain dated technical, contact, and link information** Federal Highway Administration >
  
    Publications >
  
    Research Publications >
  
    Human Factors >
  
    00089.Cfm >
   ErgoTMC, A New Tool for Human-Centered TMC Design **Publication Number: FHWA-RD-00-089
    Date: April 2000**ErgoTMC, A New Tool for Human-Centered TMC Design



**Research Update:**

FHWA-RD-00-089, April 2000 (117 KB)
PDF files can be viewed with the Acrobat® Reader®       

			



	FHWA-RD-00-089 Page Owner: Office of Research, Development, and Technology, Office of Safety, RDT
          
          
          
          Topics: research, safety, human factors, data and analysis tools
              
                Keywords: research, safety, TMC, Transportation Management Center, Traffic Management Center, Freeway Management, Traffic Signal System, Human Factors, Human-Centered Design, Ergonomics, Transportation 
              
                TRT Terms: Transportation--Management--Data processing, Human factors, Ergonomics, Traffic control centers
              
                  Scheduled Update: Archive -  No Update needed
          
          
          
          
This page last modified on 06/29/2016


|Return to top
|-------------

Privacy Policy Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Accessibility Web Policies & Notices No Fear Act Report Waste, Fraud and Abuse  U.S. DOT Home USA.gov WhiteHouse.gov
 Federal Highway Administration  Turner-Fairbank Highway Research Center
§ 600.505 Other information DOE may consider. In making the determination under § 600.502(b)(2), DOE may— ( a ) consider information on the relevant international and domestic law obligations of the country of incorporation of the parent company of an applicant;
( b ) consider information relating to the policies and practices of the country of incorporation of the parent company of an applicant with respect to: ( 1 ) The eligibility criteria for, and the experience of United States-owned company participation in, energy-related research and development programs;
( 2 ) Local investment opportunities afforded to United States-owned companies; and
( 3 ) Protection of intellectual property rights of United States-owned companies;
( c ) Seek and consider advice from other federal agencies, as appropriate; and
( d ) Consider any publicly available information in addition to the information provided by the applicant.
Case 2:06-cv-00721-MHT-TFM Document 11 Filed 10/06/2006 Page 1 of 1