alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 708.10 Informal resolution of complaints. ( a ) DOE encourages the use of alternative dispute resolution. If the parties are willing, they can seek to utilize alternative dispute resolution techniques, such as settlement discussions or mediation, in an attempt to resolve the complaint.
( b ) The parties may engage in alternative dispute resolution at any time prior to the issuance of an initial agency decision.
( c ) If the parties resolve the complaint informally, the Head of Field Element, EC Director, and the Office of Hearings and Appeals must be given a copy of the settlement agreement or a written statement from the employee that withdraws the complaint.
# Materials Not Included in **Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket**

Docket Number: FAA- 2012 - 1156 Directorate Identifier: 2011NM205AD

737 - 52 - 1079 --- 12/16/83 737 - 52 - 1079, R1 --- 12/15/88 737 - 52 - 1079, R2 --- 7/20/89 737 - 52 - 1079 , R3 --- 5/17/90 737 - 52 - 1079, R4 --- 2/21/91 737 - 52 - 1079, R5 --- 5/16/96 737 - 52A1079, R6 --- 11/18/99

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket



### MA **Y BE VIEWED AT:** Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate Rules Docket 1601 Lind Ave. SW., Renton, WA 98057 425.227.1221 **DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Form Date: 0 3/05/2008
# EUR-Lex - 31980R3485 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31980R3485

**Council Regulation (EEC) No 3485/80 of 22 December 1980 amending, consequent upon the accession of Greece, Regulation (EEC) No 2782/75 on the production and marketing of eggs for hatching and of farmyard poultry chicks **

*
Official Journal L 365 , 31/12/1980 P. 0001 - 0001 Finnish special edition: Chapter 3 Volume 12 P. 0267 Greek special edition: Chapter 03 Volume 32 P. 0200 Swedish special edition: Chapter 3 Volume 12 P. 0267 Spanish special edition: Chapter 03 Volume 20 P. 0132 Portuguese special edition Chapter 03 Volume 20 P. 0132 *

*****

COUNCIL REGULATION (EEC) No 3485/80

of 22 December 1980

amending, consequent upon the accession of Greece, Regulation (EEC) No 2782/75 on the production and marketing of eggs for hatching and of farmyard poultry chicks

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN

COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community,

Having regard to the 1979 Act of Accession and in particular Article 146 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the Commission,

Whereas the accession of Greece necessitates amendment of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2782/75 of 29 October 1975 on the production and marketing of eggs for hatching and of farmyard poultry chicks (1),

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Regulation (EEC) No 2782/75 is hereby amended as follows:

1. Article 5 (3) shall be replaced by the following:

'3. Eggs for hatching shall be transported in perfectly clean packs, containing only eggs for hatching of the same species, category and type of poultry, originating in one establishment and bearing at least the words: "eggs for hatching", "rugeaeg", "Bruteier", "avgá pros ekkólapsin", "oeufs à couver", "uova da cova", or "broedeieren".'

2. Article 6 shall be replaced by the following:

'Article 6

Eggs for hatching from third countries may be imported only if they bear, in type at least 3 mm high, the name of the country of origin and the printed words "hatching", "rugeaeg", "Brutei", "pros ekkólapsin", "à couver", "cova", or "broedei". Their packings must contain only eggs for hatching of the same species, category and type of poultry from the same country of origin and sender, and must bear at least the following particulars:

(a) the information shown on the eggs;

(b) the species of poultry from which the eggs come;

(c) the sender's name or business name or address.'

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 1 January 1981.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 22 December 1980.

For the Council

The President

J. SANTER

(1) OJ No L 282, 1. 11. 1975, p. 100.
§ 490.604 Penalties and Fines. ( a ) *Civil penalties.* Whoever violates § 490.603 shall be subject to a civil penalty of not more than $10,846 for each violation.
( b ) *Willful violations.* Whoever willfully violates section 490.603 of this part shall pay a criminal fine of not more than $10,000 for each violation.
( c ) *Repeated violations.* Any person who knowingly and willfully violates section 490.603 of this part, after having been subjected to a civil penalty for a prior violation of section 490.603 shall pay a criminal fine of not more than $50,000 for each violation.
[61 FR 10653, Mar. 14, 1996, as amended at 62 FR 46183, Sept. 2, 1997; 74 FR 66032, Dec. 14, 2009; 79 FR 19, Jan. 2, 2014; 81 FR 41794, June 28, 2016; 81 FR 96351, Dec. 30, 2016; 83 FR 1291, Jan. 11, 2018; 83 FR 66083, Dec. 26, 2018; 85 FR 830, Jan. 8, 2020; 86 FR 2956, Jan. 14, 2021; 87 FR 1064, Jan. 10, 2022; 88 FR 2193, Jan. 13, 2023; 89 FR 1028, Jan. 9, 2024]
#### § 590.101 Purpose and scope.

The purpose of this part is to establish the rules and procedures required to be followed by persons to obtain authorizations from DOE to import or export natural gas under the Natural Gas Act and by all other persons interested in participating in a natural gas import or export proceeding before the agency. This part establishes the procedural rules necessary to implement the authorities vested in the Secretary of Energy by sections 301(b) and 402(f) of the DOE Act, which have been delegated to the Assistant Secretary.
#### In the Matter of White Realty, Inc., Appellant, v. Fred H. Kossow et al., Constituting the Board of Trustees of the Village of Briarcliff Manor, et al., Respondents.

Judgment of the Supreme 'Court, Westchester County, dated September 25, 1967, affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Appeal from order of said court dated December 28, 1967 dismissed, without costs. No appeal lies from an order denying reargument. Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, Hopkins, Munder and Martuseello, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 32 (Thursday, February 18, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 7291]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-3247]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[USITC SE-10-002]


Government in the Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: United States International Trade 
Commission.

ORIGINAL DATE AND TIME: February 12, 2010 at 11 a.m.

NEW DATE AND TIME: February 19, 2010 at 11 a.m.

PLACE: 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, Telephone: (202) 205-
2000.

STATUS: Open to the public.
    In accordance with 19 CFR 201.35(d)(1), the Commission has 
determined to reschedule the meeting of 11 a.m., February 12, 2010 to 
11 a.m., February 19, 2010. Earlier announcement of this rescheduling 
was not possible.
    By order of the Commission.


    Issued: February 9, 2010.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2010-3247 Filed 2-16-10; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-27-1997
<CASH>                                            7556
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    76190
<ALLOWANCES>                                      4372
<INVENTORY>                                      99895
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                194451
<PP&E>                                          105387
<DEPRECIATION>                                   31357
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  296934
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            98925
<BONDS>                                         137545
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           223
<OTHER-SE>                                       42367
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     42590
<SALES>                                          79727
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 79727
<CGS>                                            63944
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    63944
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 18790
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                2965
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (5972)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (5972)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (5972)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.27)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.27)
        

</TABLE>
IV 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 227 

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to permit Delegates 

and the Resident Commissioner to the Congress to cast votes in the 

Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 23, 2017 

Ms. PLASKETT submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Rules 

RESOLUTION 

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to 

permit Delegates and the Resident Commissioner to the 

Congress to cast votes in the Committee of the Whole 

House on the state of the Union. 

1 Resolved, That clause 3(a) of rule III of the Rules 

2 of the House of Representatives is amended by inserting 

3 before the first sentence the following: ‘‘In the Committee 

4 of the Whole House on the state of the Union, each Dele5 gate and the Resident Commissioner shall possess the 

6 same powers and privileges as Members of the House.’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
PGI 215.304 Evaluation factors and

significant subfactors.

(c)(i)(A) Evaluation factors may include—

(1) The extent to which such firms are specifically identified in proposals;

(2) The extent of commitment to use such firms (for example, enforceable commitments are to be

weighted more heavily than non-enforceable ones);

(3) The complexity and variety of the work small firms are to perform;

(4) The realism of the proposal;

(5) Past performance of the offerors in complying with requirements of the clauses at FAR 52.219-8,

Utilization of Small Business Concerns, and 52.219-9, Small Business Subcontracting Plan; and

(6) The extent of participation of such firms in terms of the value of the total acquisition.

(v) Using authority granted in section 806 of Pub. L. 111-383 to exclude a source based on supply

chain risk requires an evaluation factor for supply chain risk, as specified at DFARS 239.73.

Evaluating supply chain risk requires review of the supply chain, including all information

technology subcontractors and suppliers that are proposed for use at any time in the performance of

the contract and may involve the use of all-source intelligence information. The requiring activity is

responsible for obtaining any necessary all-source intelligence information and must inform the

contracting officer and source selection authority of the results of the review for use in evaluating

offers.

Parent topic: PGI 215.3 -SOURCE SELECTION
#### § 706.32 Security indoctrination of non-employee representatives.

All collective bargaining representatives, company and union, who are to have access to Restricted Data, will be given appropriate security indoctrination.
U.S. Department of the Interior

U.S. Geological Survey

USGS Fact Sheet 135-01

2001

Underwater Microscope System

The U.S. Geological Survey has

a patent pending, as of November

2001, for a new underwater microscope system, which has the capability to acquire and analyze digital

images of sediment grains on a riverbed or sea bottom without the

need to manually collect actual bottom samples. In this system, a

close-up microscopic lens is installed on a modified version of a

commercially available camera

system. The underwater microscope camera is enclosed in a special housing that, together with

U. S. Geological Survey raft deploying underwater microscope system in Colorado River.
Printed on recycled paper

Typical video frame showing bottom sediment (image is 1 cm across)

ballasting, winching, and operational procedures, permits topside

operators to work from a small vessel even in swift-moving rivers.

The system acquires a video image of the seabed at c-inch distance from the focal plane of the

lens and sends the video signal

through a cable to a digital video

recording console on the surface

vessel. The image is received at the

surface and recorded as digital

video. Later, these digital video sequences are viewed on a computer,

and quality frames of each bottom

contact sample are saved. These

images are then analyzed using one

of several algorithms.

At least four different approaches can be used to determine

grain size from video images of

sediment:

(1) Visual estimates by a human operator

(2) Use of an edge-detection

algorithm to recognize

and measure individual

grains

(3) Use of two-dimensional

fast fourier transform or

wavelets to measure

grain size

(4) Spatial autocorrelation

The underwater microscope system is designed to assist sedimentologists, marine geologists, or any

other scientists interested in studying the surficial bottom sediments

in lakes, rivers, and oceans. Improvements to the system’s lens design are in development to permit

gravel characterizations that would

have applications in aquaculture

and fish wildlife studies.

Video camera assembly including stabilizer fin,

camera pressure case, and bridle assembly.

For More Information

For technical information, contact:

Hank Chezar

U.S. Geological Survey

345 Middlefield Road, MS–999

Menlo Park, CA 94025

Phone: (650) 329-5331

hchezar@usgs.gov

For licensing information, contact:

Julia Giller or Neil Mark

USGS Technology Enterprise Office

National Center, MS–211

12201 Sunrise Valley Dr.

Reston, VA 20192

Phone: (703) 648-4403

Fax (703) 648-4408

jgiller@usgs.gov

Topside video console, including video monitor

and digital recorder
Editorial Note on Part 2
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

§ 2.1324 Appearance in an oral hearing. ( a ) A participant may appear in a hearing on her or his own behalf or be represented by an authorized representative.
( b ) A person appearing shall file a written notice stating her or his name, address and telephone number, and if an authorized representative, the basis of her or his eligibility and the name and address of the participant on whose behalf she or he appears.
( c ) A person may be excluded from a hearing for disorderly, dilatory or contemptuous conduct, provided he or she is informed of the grounds and given an opportunity to respond.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 166 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 166

 Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the United 
States postal facility network is an asset of significant value and the 
   United States Postal Service should take appropriate measures to 
maintain, modernize and fully utilize the existing post office network 
                          for economic growth.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 2, 2017

    Mr. Amodei (for himself and Mr. Welch) submitted the following 
   resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and 
                           Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the United 
States postal facility network is an asset of significant value and the 
   United States Postal Service should take appropriate measures to 
maintain, modernize and fully utilize the existing post office network 
                          for economic growth.

Whereas the postal facility network is an integral part of universal service and 
        should be modernized to make universal service relevant for the 21st 
        century;
Whereas the closure of post offices in rural communities would create an 
        economic burden for people in the United States that depend on universal 
        service for communication, package services, and non-typical postal 
        services;
Whereas the closure process of post offices does not adequately take into 
        account community input;
Whereas post offices are recognized as secure and trustworthy, and could 
        function as the location for other government services, community 
        events, and emergency services; and
Whereas post offices have become a part of the identity of rural communities, 
        and provide a significant social value: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives that 
the United States Postal Service should take all appropriate measures 
to modernize and maintain a post office network.
                                 <all>
```
1 The Honorable David S. Doty, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 03-3233

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Minnesota Duane Wendall Larson, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: May 26, 2004 Filed: June 8, 2004

___________ Before BYE, McMILLIAN, and RILEY, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Duane Larson appeals from the final judgment entered in the District Court 1 for the District of Minnesota denying his motion for a writ of mandamus. For reversal, Larson argues that the district court erred in finding res judicata barred his claim that the government breached its plea agreement with him in a tax-evas ion prosecution against him, see Larson v. United States , 835 F.2d 169, 171 (8th Cir. 1987), cert. denied , 486 U.S. 1056 (1988), by later seizing money from two of his bank accounts, see Larson v. United States , 274 F.3d 643, 644 (1st Cir. 2001). Although the-2- government ultimately returned the seized money, see id. , Larson sought “lost imputed interest costs.” For the reasons discussed below, we affirm the judgment of the district court. Specifically, we agree with the district court that Larson’s action is barred by res judicata, as his breach-of-contract claim was denied by the Court of Federal Claims, and the First Circuit Court of Appeals found that he was not entitled to recover interest on the seized money. Seeid. at 645-48; Lundquist v. Rice Mem’l Hosp. , 238 F.3d 975, 977 (8th Cir. 2001) (per curiam) (elements of res judicata). To the extent Larson seeks relief under the Fourth Amendment unrelated to the recovery of lost interest, such relief is not appropriately sought by motion for a writ of mandamus in his criminal tax-evasion case. Finally, we reject Larson’s argument that he is entitled to costs and fees, because he is not the prevailing party in this litigation. See 28 U.S.C. § 2412; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court.

______________________________
Editorial Note on Part 72
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 72 appear at 80 FR 74981, Dec. 1, 2015, and at 81 FR 86910, Dec. 2, 2016.

§ 72.98 Identifying regions around an ISFSI or MRS site. ( a ) The regional extent of external phenomena, man-made or natural, that are used as a basis for the design of the ISFSI or MRS must be identified.
( b ) The potential regional impact due to the construction, operation or decommissioning of the ISFSI or MRS must be identified. The extent of regional impacts must be determined on the basis of potential measurable effects on the population or the environment from ISFSI or MRS activities.
( c ) Those regions identified pursuant to paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section must be investigated as appropriate with respect to: ( 1 ) The present and future character and the distribution of population,
( 2 ) Consideration of present and projected future uses of land and water within the region, and
( 3 ) Any special characteristics that may influence the potential consequences of a release of radioactive material during the operational lifetime of the ISFSI or MRS.
###### Editorial Note on Part 72

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 72 appear at 80 FR 74981, Dec. 1, 2015, and at 81 FR 86910, Dec. 2, 2016.

#### § 72.180 Physical protection plan.

The licensee shall establish, maintain, and follow a detailed plan for physical protection as described in § 73.51 of this chapter. The licensee shall retain a copy of the current plan as a record until the Commission terminates the license for which the procedures were developed and, if any portion of the plan is superseded, retain the superseded material for 3 years after each change or until termination of the license. The plan must describe how the applicant will meet the requirements of § 73.51 of this chapter and provide physical protection during on-site transportation to and from the proposed ISFSI or MRS and include within the plan the design for physical protection, the licensee's safeguards contingency plan, and the security organization personnel training and qualification plan. The plan must list tests, inspections, audits, and other means to be used to demonstrate compliance with such requirements.

[63 FR 26961, May 15, 1998]
5303.1104 Mitigation or Waiver

(b) See MP5301.601(a)(i).

Parent topic: Subpart 5303.11 - PREVENTING PERSONAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST FOR

CONTRACTOR EMPLOYEES PERFORMING ACQUISITION FUNCTIONS
Presidential Documents

80673 

Federal Register 

Vol. 75, No. 246 

Thursday, December 23, 2010 

Title 3— 

The President 

Memorandum of December 20, 2010 

Delegation of Certain Functions and Authorities 

Memorandum for the Director of the Office of Personnel Management 

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the 

laws of the United States, including section 301 of title 3, United States 

Code, I hereby delegate to you the functions and authority conferred upon 

the President by section 7301 of title 5, United States Code, with respect 

to providing appropriate workplace accommodations for executive branch 

civilian employees who are nursing mothers. 

You are authorized and directed to publish this memorandum in the Federal 

Register. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

Washington, December 20, 2010 

[FR Doc. 2010–32463 

Filed 12–22–10; 8:45 am] 

Billing code 6325–01–P 


WReier-Aviles on DSKGBLS3C1PROD with PRESDOC1OB#1.EPS</GPH>