alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| Autism
**Autism booklet**Defines autism, explains how this devastating childhood disorder is diagnosed, and summarizes current thinking about possible causes.  Answers questions about treatment approaches, including available medications, and describes options for enhancing social skills and opportunities for learning.  Discusses coping strategies for family members, summarizes ongoing research initiatives, and lists sources of additional information and support.  60p. Printed 1997.  NIH 97-4023 |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
`[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 202 Reported in House (RH)]






                                                  House Calendar No. 20
109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 202

                          [Report No. 109-35]

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 8) to make the repeal of 
                       the estate tax permanent.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 12, 2005

 Mr. Hastings of Washington, from the Committee on Rules, reported the 
  following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and 
                         ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION


 
Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 8) to make the repeal of 
                       the estate tax permanent.

    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 8) to make the repeal of 
the estate tax permanent. The bill shall be considered as read. The 
previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and on any 
amendment thereto to final passage without intervening motion except: 
(1) one hour of debate on the bill equally divided and controlled by 
the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on Ways and 
Means; (2) the amendment in nature of a substitute printed in the 
report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution, if 
offered by Representative Pomeroy of North Dakota or his designee, 
which shall be in order without intervention of any point of order, 
shall be considered as read, and shall be separately debatable for one 
hour equally divided and controlled by the proponent and an opponent; 
and (3) one motion to recommit with or without instructions.




                                                  House Calendar No. 20

109th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                              H. RES. 202

                          [Report No. 109-35]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 8) to make the repeal of 
                       the estate tax permanent.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             April 12, 2005

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed`
Agenda for Siloxanes Meeting

August 21, 2013 from 10am-4p EST

In Person Location: (Interested parties and observers will need to be signed-in. Please arrive promptly.) US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)

EPA East Room 4225

1201 Constitution Avenue Washington, D.C. 20460

Call in Number: 1-866-299-3188, conference code: 202-564-2901#

1. Meeting introduction

2. Review of current ECA draft

3. Overview and discussion of PO TW identification document

4. Overview and discussion of test standard documents

5. Next steps/ ECA extension
PGI 206.305 Availability of the justification.       See OUSD(A&S) DPAP memorandum, “Noncompetitive Contracts Awarded Based on Urgency,” dated April 13, 2015, for further guidance on the justification and approval documents required for contracts awarded using the unusual and compelling urgency exception.    **Parent topic:** PGI 206.3 -OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
PGI 225.871-5 Directed subcontracting.

The cooperative project agreement is the authority for a contractual provision requiring the

contractor to place certain subcontracts with particular subcontractors. No separate justification

and approval during the acquisition process is required.

Parent topic: PGI 225.871 North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) cooperative projects.
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Tetra Technologies, Inc. v. David Alleman and Alleman Consulting, 

LLC

Appellate case number: 01-19-00049-CV

Trial court case number: 2018-66742

Trial court: 269th District Court of Harris County

On July 9, 2019, this Court abated this appeal pending the trial court’s resolution of a 

related matter. Since then, appellees have filed several status reports in this Court, the most 

recent on June 10, 2022. The last status report indicated trial of the related matter, which was 

scheduled on the two-week docket beginning May 16, 2022, was not reached and has yet to be 

reset.

Appellees are hereby ordered to file a tenth status report within 90 days from the date of 

this order. The status report should advise this Court of the status of any related trial court 

proceedings. 

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: _________/s/ Julie Countiss______________________

Acting individually

Date: June 23, 2022
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Surface Transportation Board

          - [Docket No. EP 290 (Sub-No. 5) (2011-1)]

# AGENCY:

Surface Transportation Board, DOT.

# ACTION:

Approval of rail cost adjustment factor.

# SUMMARY:

The Board has approved the first quarter 2011 Rail Cost Adjustment Factor (RCAF) and cost index filed by the Association of American Railroads. The first quarter 2011 RCAF (Unadjusted) is 1.093. The first quarter 2011 RCAF (Adjusted) is 0.488. The first quarter 2011 RCAF-5 is 0.462.

# DATES:

*Effective Date:*                         January 1, 2011.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Pedro Ramirez, (202) 245-0333. Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) for the hearing impaired: (800) 877-8339.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Additional information is contained in the Board's decision, which is available on our Web site,                     *http://www.stb.dot.gov.*                     Copies of the decision may be purchased by contacting the Office of Public Assistance, Governmental Affairs, and Compliance at (202) 245-0235. Assistance for the hearing impaired is available through FIRS at (800) 877-8339.                

This decision will not significantly affect the quality of the human environment or the conservation of energy resources.

Decided: December 20, 2010.

By the Board, Chairman Elliott, Vice Chairman Mulvey, and Commissioner Nottingham.

Andrea Pope-Matheson,

Clearance Clerk.

[FR Doc. 2010-32366 Filed 12-22-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4915-01-P
exv4w1



 







Exhibit 4.1




CERTIFICATE OF MEMBERSHIP UNITS




[Homeland Energy Solutions, LLC Logo)







	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	Membership
	Number
	 	 	 	Units
	

    


	 	 	 	





	 












HOMELAND ENERGY SOLUTIONS, LLC

A Limited Liability Company

Organized Under the Laws of the State of Iowa








     THIS CERTIFIES THAT  
               
               
               
               
               
               
         is/are the
owner(s) of                                                                            
      UNITS (                    ) of the Membership Units of Homeland Energy Solutions, LLC, an
Iowa limited liability company. Changes in the actual Membership Units held by the Members
are reflected in the Certificate of Registration of the Company.


The Membership Units represented by this Certificate may not be transferred or assigned except
in compliance with the Operating Agreement of the Company, a copy of which is available at the
principal office of the Company.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Certificate to be signed by its duly
authorized President and Secretary as of this                      day of                                         , 20         
           .




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 

	 	 

Stephen Eastman, President
	 	 
	 	 

Steve Dietz, Secretary
	 	 






 









 





FOR
VALUE RECEIVED,                      hereby sell, assign, and transfer unto                                 
                                                 Units
represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint                                                             
Attorney to transfer the said Units on the books of the within named Company with full power
of substitution in the premises.



     Dated                                         ,                     .



In Presence of




	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 

	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	 
	 

	 	 	 	 





THE TRANSFERABILITY OF THE MEMBERSHIP UNITS REPRESENTED BY THIS CERTIFICATE
IS RESTRICTED. SUCH UNITS MAY NOT BE SOLD, ASSIGNED, OR TRANSFERRED, AND NO
ASSIGNEE, VENDEE, TRANSFEREE OR ENDORSEE THEREOF WILL BE RECOGNIZED AS HAVING
ACQUIRED ANY SUCH UNITS FOR ANY PURPOSES, UNLESS AND TO THE EXTENT SUCH SALE,
TRANSFER, HYPOTHECATION, OR ASSIGNMENT IS PERMITTED BY, AND IS COMPLETED IN STRICT
ACCORDANCE WITH, APPLICABLE FEDERAL AND STATE LAW AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS SET
FORTH IN THE OPERATING AGREEMENT OF THE COMPANY, AS AMENDED FROM TIME TO TIME.



THE SECURITIES REPRESENTED BY THIS CERTIFICATE MAY NOT BE SOLD, OFFERED FOR SALE
OR TRANSFERRED IN THE ABSENCE OF AN EFFECTIVE REGISTRATION UNDER THE SECURITIES
ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED, AND UNDER APPLICABLE STATE SECURITIES LAWS, OR AN OPINION
OF COUNSEL SATISFACTORY TO THE COMPANY THAT SUCH TRANSACTION IS EXEMPT FROM
REGISTRATION UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED, AND UNDER APPLICABLE
STATE SECURITIES LAWS.
exv10w40






Exhibit 10.40




Corrections Corporation of America (the “Company”)




Summary of Director and Executive Officer Compensation


I. Director Compensation. Directors who are employees of the Company do not receive additional
compensation for serving as directors of the Company. The following table sets forth current rates
of cash compensation for the Company’s non-employee directors.




	 	 	 	 	 
	Retainers and Fees	 	 	 	 
	Board retainer
	 	$	50,000	 
	Board meeting fee
	 	$	3,000	 
	Audit chair retainer
	 	$	10,000	 
	Audit member retainer
	 	$	2,000	 
	Compensation, Nominating and Governance chair retainer
	 	$	5,000	 
	Committee chair meeting fee (excluding Executive)
	 	$	2,500	 
	Non-chair committee meeting fee
	 	$	2,000	 






     In addition to the cash compensation set forth above, each non-employee director has
historically received a grant of a non-qualified option for the purchase of shares of the Company’s
common stock following the Company’s annual meeting of stockholders.


II. Executive Officer Compensation. The following table sets forth the current base salaries and
the fiscal 2009 performance bonuses provided to the individuals who are anticipated to constitute
the named executive officers of the Company for 2010.




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	Fiscal 2009
	Executive Officer	 	Current Salary	 	Bonus Amount
	Damon T. Hininger
	 	$	600,000	 	 	$	398,895	 
	Todd J Mullenger
	 	$	290,000	 	 	$	306,124	 
	Richard P. Seiter
	 	$	310,655	 	 	$	327,927	 
	Anthony L. Grande
	 	$	270,000	 	 	$	285,013	 
	G. A. Puryear, IV
	 	$	257,094	 	 	$	271,389	 






     The named executive officers also participate in the Company’s 2010 Cash Bonus Plan and will
continue to receive long-term incentive awards pursuant to the Company’s stockholder approved
equity incentive plans.


III. Additional Information. The foregoing information is summary in nature. Additional
information regarding director and named executive officer compensation will be provided in the
Company’s proxy statement to be filed in connection with the 2010 annual meeting of stockholders.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsBOREAS TE-4 Branch Bag Data From Boreal Tree SpeciesThe BOREAS TE-4 team collected continuous records of gas exchange under ambient conditions from intact boreal forest trees in the BOREAS NSA from 23-Jul-1996 until 14-Aug-1996. These measurements can be used to test models of photosynthesis, stomatal conductance, and leaf respiration, such as SiB2 (Sellers et al., 1996) or the leaf model (Collatz et al., 1991), and programs can be obtained from the investigators. The data are stored in tabular ASCII files. The data files are available on a CD-ROM (see document number 20010000884), or from the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) Distributed Active Archive Center (DAAC).Document ID20010004212Acquisition SourceGoddard Space Flight CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsHall, Forrest G.*(NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt, MD United States)*Papagno, Andrea*(Raytheon Information Technology and Scientific Services Greenbelt, MD United States)*Berry, Joseph A.*(Carnegie Institution of Washington Stanford, CA United States)*Fu, Wei*(Carnegie Institution of Washington Stanford, CA United States)*Fredeen, Art*(University of Northern British Columbia Prince George, British Columbia Canada)*Gamon, John*(California State Univ. Los Angeles, CA United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 7, 2013Publication DateOctober 1, 2000Subject CategoryEarth Resources And Remote SensingReport/Patent NumberNASA/TM-2000-209891/VOL134Rept-2000-03136-0/VOL134NAS 1.15:209891/VOL134Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 462-33-01Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20010004212.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
Kentucky Energy and Environment Cabinet 

Kentucky Division for Air Quality 

------------------------------------------- 

Appendix M 

VISTAS Modeling Reports 

 Appendix M - 1 

Kentucky Regional Haze SIP
[This page intentionally left blank.]

 Appendix M - 2 

Kentucky Regional Haze SIP
Introduction 

The regional haze modeling was coordinated by the Southeast Regional Planning Organization, 

Visibility Improvement State and Tribal Association of the Southeast (VISTAS), which is 

comprised of the ten Southeast States (Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, North 

Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, Virginia and West Virginia) and the local programs and 

tribal agencies located within these states. VISTAS contracted with Environ International Corp, 

Alpine Geophysics, LLC and the University of California Riverside to perform the emissions and 

air quality modeling for this regional haze state and tribal implementation plans. This appendix 

contains several modeling reports produced by the contractors in support of these regional haze 

plans for the VISTAS states. 

Appendix M.1 contains the preliminary draft of the Technical Support Document for VISTAS 

Emissions and Air Quality Modeling to Support Regional Haze State Implementation Plans, as 

submitted by the VISTAS contractors. The document contains information on the development 

of the emission inventory, as well as a domain wide model performance evaluation. The 

document is in draft final form; however, any revisions will be included in the final submission 

of this state implementation plan. 

M.1 Appendices: 

Appendix A: Emission Processing Selected QA Summary Reports and Figures 

Appendix B: Air Quality Model Performance Evaluation: Regional Model Evaluation 

across the VISTAS Region 

Appendix C: Air Quality Model Performance Evaluation: Evaluation at VISTAS and 

Nearby Class I Areas 

Appendix D: Air Quality Model Performance Evaluation: Spatial Maps of Model 

Performance on the Best and Worst 20 Percent Days at VISTAS and Nearby Class I 

Areas 

Appendix E: 2018 Visibility Projects at VISTAS and Nearby Class I Areas for the Worst 

20 Percent Days using EPA Default Approach and Comparison with 2018 Uniform Rate 

of Progress 

Appendix F: 2018 Visibility Projections at VISTAS and Nearby Class I Areas for the 

Best 20 Percent Days using EPA Default Approach 

Appendix G: Evaluation of the 2002 GEOS-CHEM Global Chemistry Model Used for 

Boundary Conditions in the VISTAS Regional Haze Modeling 

Appendix H: Based on “VISTAS Area of Influence Analyses for Sulfur Dioxide” by 

Archuleta, Adhloch, Mansell, Stella and Brewer (February 28, 2007) and “Procedures for 

Developing and Displaying AoI Back-trajectories Residence Time GIS Data by Mansell 

(August 29, 2007) 

 Appendix M - 3 

Kentucky Regional Haze SIP
Appendix M.2 contains a description of the procedure for developing and displaying the Area of 

Influence back trajectories and residence time data, described in Appendix H of M.1 in 

Arc/INFO GIS. 

 

 Appendix M - 4 

Kentucky Regional Haze SIP
[This page intentionally left blank.]

 Appendix M - 5 

Kentucky Regional Haze SIP
#### § 708.27 The Administrative Judge may not require that the parties participate in alternative dispute resolution.

The Administrative Judge may recommend, but may not require, that the parties attempt to resolve the complaint through alternative dispute resolution. Within 5 days of appointment, the Administrative Judge will make the contact information for the DOE's Alternative Dispute Resolution Office available to the parties.
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm



To the Board of Directors, PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.:



We have examined management’s assertion, included in the accompanying Report
on Assessment of Compliance with Regulation AB Servicing Criteria, that Midland Loan Services, a division of PNC Bank, National
Association (“Midland” or the “Company”) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d)
of the Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for all transactions serviced on the Enterprise!Loan Management
System (the “Platform”), as of December 31, 2016 and for the year then ended, excluding criteria 1122(d)(1)(iii), 1122(d)(3)(i)(B),
1122(d)(3)(i)(C), 1122(d)(3)(i)(D), 1122(d)(3)(ii), 1122(d)(3)(iii), 1122(d)(3)(iv), and 1122(d)(4)(xv), which the Company has
determined are not applicable to the servicing activities performed by it with respect to the Platform. Management is responsible
for the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion
based on our examination.



Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards of the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company’s
compliance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances.
Our examination included testing of selected asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing of selected
servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed
those selected activities in compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our procedures were limited to the selected transactions
and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to
detect noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurred prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the
balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report. We believe that our examination
provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company’s compliance
with the servicing criteria.





In our opinion, management’s assertion that Midland complied with the aforementioned
applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016 for the Platform is fairly stated, in all material
respects.







February 17, 2017

















PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, 1100 Walnut Street, Suite 1300, Kansas City, MO 64106

T: (816) 472 7921, F: (816) 218 1890 www.pwc.com/us
**Exhibit 32.1**

**Certification of Chief Executive Officer Under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

The undersigned officer of First National Lincoln Corporation (the "Company") hereby certifies that the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2007 to which this certification is being furnished as an exhibit (the "Report"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. This certification is provided pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K ("Item 601(b)(32)") promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"), and the Exchange Act. In accordance with clause (ii) of Item 601(b)(32), thiscertification (A) shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and (B) shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.

 

Date: August 3, 2007

 

/s/ Daniel R. Daigneault

Daniel R. Daigneault

President & Chief Executive Officer

First National Lincoln Corporation