alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
exv10w29



 




Exhibit 10.29



Senior Executives’ Deferred Share Unit Plan

for

Trident Exploration Corp. (the “Plan”)




PARTICIPATION ELECTION — Section 2.1 of the Plan



I hereby confirm that, as of the date written below, I am an employee of Trident Exploration
Corp. (the “Corporation”) and acknowledge that I will be granted Deferred Share Units under Section
2.1 of the Plan by the Board of Directors of the Corporation, on a discretionary basis, from time
to time, subject to and in accordance with the terms of the Plan.



I confirm that:





	1.	 	I have received and reviewed a copy of the terms of the Plan and agree to be bound by them
and to participate in the Plan.






	2.	 	I understand that I will not be able to cause the Corporation to redeem Discretionary DSUs
granted under the Plan (“DSUs”) unless such DSUs have vested in accordance with the terms of
the Plan and the grant thereof, and I am no longer either a director or an employee of the
Corporation or of an “affiliate” thereof, as defined in paragraph 8 of Canada Revenue Agency’s
Interpretation Bulletin IT-337R4 dated October 21, 2003 (an “Affiliate”).






	3.	 	I recognize that when DSUs credited pursuant to the Plan are redeemed in accordance with the
terms of the Plan after I am no longer either a director or employee of the Corporation or of
an Affiliate, income tax and other withholdings as required will arise at that time. Upon
redemption of the DSUs, the Corporation will make all appropriate withholdings as required by
law at that time.






	4.	 	The value of DSUs are based on the value of the common shares of the Corporation or a Related
Corporation and therefore are not guaranteed.






	5.	 	No funds will be set aside to guarantee the payment of DSUs. Future payment of DSUs will
remain an unfunded and unsecured liability recorded on the books of the Corporation.





     The foregoing is only a brief outline of certain key provisions of the Plan. For more
complete information, reference should be made to the Plan text which governs in the case of
conflict or inconsistency with this Participation Election. All capitalized expressions used
herein shall have the same meaning as in the Plan unless otherwise defined herein.






	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 
	Date

	 	 	 	(Name of Employee)
	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 	 	(Signature of Employee)
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1176 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
H. Res. 1176

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                     December 12, 2018.
    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider the conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 2) to provide for the 
reform and continuation of agricultural and other programs of the Department of 
Agriculture through fiscal year 2023, and for other purposes. All points of 
order against the conference report and against its consideration are waived. 
The conference report shall be considered as read. The previous question shall 
be considered as ordered on the conference report to its adoption without 
intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate; and (2) one motion to 
recommit if applicable.
    Sec. 2.  The provisions of section 7 of the War Powers Resolution (50 U.S.C. 
1546) shall not apply during the remainder of the One Hundred Fifteenth Congress 
to a concurrent resolution introduced pursuant to section 5 of the War Powers 
Resolution (50 U.S.C. 1544) with respect to the Republic of Yemen.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
§ 54.31 Issuance of a renewed license. ( a ) A renewed license will be of the class for which the operating license or combined license currently in effect was issued.
( b ) A renewed license will be issued for a fixed period of time, which is the sum of the additional amount of time beyond the expiration of the operating license or combined license (not to exceed 20 years) that is requested in a renewal application plus the remaining number of years on the operating license or combined license currently in effect. The term of any renewed license may not exceed 40 years.
( c ) A renewed license will become effective immediately upon its issuance, thereby superseding the operating license or combined license previously in effect. If a renewed license is subsequently set aside upon further administrative or judicial appeal, the operating license or combined license previously in effect will be reinstated unless its term has expired and the renewal application was not filed in a timely manner.
( d ) A renewed license may be subsequently renewed in accordance with all applicable requirements.
[60 FR 22491, May 8, 1995, as amended at 72 FR 49560, Aug. 28, 2007]
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 1**  **5 -**  **6430**

JARRETT D. HOLDEN , Petitioner

- Appellant ,
v. HAROLD CLARKE, Director of VA. D.O.C. , Respondent

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Alexandria
. T. S. Ellis, III , Senior District Judge. ( 1:13

- cv - 0 1591

- TSE

- MSN )

Submitted : July 1, 2015 Decided: July 15, 2015

Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and WYNN , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Jarrett D. Holden, Appellant Pro Se. Leah A. Darron, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Jarrett D. Holden seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.
§ 2 253(c)(1) (A) (2012) . A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012)
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this stan dard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When th e district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85
. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Holden has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral
argumen t because the facts and legal contentions are adequately3 presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
ATTACHMENT B

Application Requirements

 

For appurtenance material supplied by the owner, owner shall providemanufacturer, connector and/or member locations, orientations, sizes, types, andstrength capacities with this Attachment.

> 
Climbing device desired by owner _________

Delivery schedule _________

Free on board destination (F.O.B.) _________

Additional requirements (below)
** 

 **
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 246 (Thursday, December 23, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 80885-80886]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-32247]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration


Fifteenth Meeting: EUROCAE WG-72: RTCA Special Committee 216: 
Aeronautical Systems Security (Joint Meeting)

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of EUROCAE WG-72: RTCA Special Committee 216: 
Aeronautical Systems Security (Joint Meeting).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of a 
meeting of EUROCAE WG-72: RTCA Special Committee 216: Aeronautical 
Systems Security (Joint Meeting).

DATES: The meeting will be held January 18-21, 2011 starting at 9 a.m. 
to 5 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at The Westin Long Beach, 333 East 
Ocean Boulevard, Long Beach, CA. Telephone--(562) 499-2025, Host, 
Boeing Commercial Airplane Group.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: RTCA Secretariat, 1828 L Street, NW., 
Suite 805, Washington, DC 20036; telephone (202) 833-9339; fax (202) 
833-9434; Web site http://www.rtca.org.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), notice 
is hereby given for a EUROCAE WG-72: RTCA Special Committee 216: 
Aeronautical Systems Security (Joint Meeting) meeting.

Agenda

    <bullet> Welcome/Introductions/Administrative Remarks.
    <bullet> Agenda Overview and Approval of the Summary of the 14th 
meeting held October 12-14th, 2010 (RTCA Paper No. 250-10/SC216-031).
    <bullet> Report on the PMC/ICC action on SC 216 TOR.
    <bullet> Publication Progress and Update.
    <bullet> Subgroup and Action Item Reports.
    <bullet> Plenary review of EUROCAE Council and RTCA PMC actions on 
ED-202 and SC-216 TOR.
    <bullet> Continuation of Glossary Review.

[[Page 80886]]

    <bullet> Publication Considerations of Glossary (Update).
    <bullet> Subgroup Meetings/Breakouts.
    <bullet> Subgroup Reports on Breakouts.
    <bullet> Establish Dates, Location and Agenda for Next Meeting(s).
    <bullet> Any Other Business.
    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairmen, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present 
statements or obtain information should contact the person listed in 
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Members of the public may 
present a written statement to the committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on December 16, 2010.
Robert L. Bostiga,
RTCA Advisory Committee.
[FR Doc. 2010-32247 Filed 12-22-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
IV 

House Calendar No. 1 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 42 

[Report No. 109–1] 

Providing for the consideration of the bill (H.R. 54) to amend title 31, 

United States Code, to provide reasonable standards for congressional 

gold medals, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 25, 2005 

Mr. SESSIONS, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for the consideration of the bill (H.R. 54) to 

amend title 31, United States Code, to provide reasonable standards for congressional gold medals, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this 

2 resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of 

3 rule XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee 

4 of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consider5 ation of the bill (H.R. 54) to amend title 31, United States 

6 Code, to provide reasonable standards for congressional 
2 

HRES 42 RH 

1 gold medals, and for other purposes. The first reading of 

2 the bill shall be dispensed with. General debate shall be 

3 confined to the bill and shall not exceed one hour equally 

4 divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking mi5 nority member of the Committee on Financial Services. 

6 After general debate the bill shall be considered for 

7 amendment under the five-minute rule. The bill shall be 

8 considered as read. No amendment to the bill shall be in 

9 order except those printed in the report of the Committee 

10 on Rules accompanying this resolution. Each such amend11 ment may be offered only in the order printed in the re12 port, may be offered only by a Member designated in the 

13 report, shall be considered as read, shall be debatable for 

14 the time specified in the report equally divided and con15 trolled by the proponent and an opponent, shall not be 

16 subject to amendment, and shall not be subject to a de17 mand for division of the question in the House or in the 

18 Committee of the Whole. All points of order against such 

19 amendments are waived. At the conclusion of consider20 ation of the bill for amendment the Committee shall rise 

21 and report the bill to the House with such amendments 

22 as may have been adopted. The previous question shall 

23 be considered as ordered on the bill and amendments 

24 thereto to final passage without intervening motion except 

25 one motion to recommit with or without instructions. 
3 

HRES 42 RH 

1 SEC. 2. Notwithstanding clause 11(a)(1) of rule XI, 

2 during the One Hundred Ninth Congress the Permanent 

3 Select Committee on Intelligence shall be composed of not 

4 more than 19 members, of whom not more than 11 may 

5 be from the same party. 
House Calendar No. 1 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 42 

[Report No. 109–1] 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for the consideration of the bill (H.R. 54) 

als, and for other purposes. reasonable standards for congressional gold medto amend title 31, United States Code, to provide 

JANUARY 25, 2005 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed
PGI 208.7102 Procedures.

PGI 208.7102-1 General.

PGI 208.7102-2 Purchase request and acceptance.

PGI 208.7102-3 Changes in estimated total prices.

PGI 208.7102-4 Payments.

Parent topic: PGI 208.71 -ACQUISITION FOR NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE

ADMINISTRATION (NASA)
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
You havereached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC)Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC.Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of catalogingand locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications.  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the eventthat publications are no longer available from the original publishing agencysite. (Historical purposes)
**Title:****The insidescoop**** 
SuDocNumber:A57.81/29:
ItemNumber:0120-A-24(online)
CGPSystem Number:000597173
 
February 2004
 
Summer/Fall 2004
 
Winter 2005
 
Summer 2006
 **
1 

# Hearing on the DLA PCB Import Petition

July 8, 20142



# PCB Petition Process TSCA 6(e)(3)(B) allows any person to petition EP A for an exemption from the § 6(e)(3) ban on manufacturing (which includes imports), processing and distribution - in -commerce of PCBs Limited to one year duration Notice-and -comment rulemaking Includes an opportunity for an informal hearing3



# Rulemaking for DLA Petition
On April 23, 2013, EP

A received a petition from Defense Logistics Agency (DLA), a component of the United States Department of Defense (DOD), to import foreign - manufactured PCBs that DOD currently owns in Japan for disposal in the US . The PCBs and PCB Items are currently in storage at U.S. military installations in Japan. DLA estimates that as much as 1,014,222 pounds of waste contaminated with PCBs could be generated in Japan through the end of calendar year 2014. DLA estimates that 94% of the waste is at concentrations below 50 ppm. The PCB waste would be imported for proper disposal in the U.S. (i.e. disposal in accordance with the regulations set forth in 40 CFR 761) Submission of the petition triggered an EP A process to review the petition and begin the rulemaking process EP A has proposed to grant DLA the import exemption4



# Hearing Objective EP A is here to receive your comments The proposed rule represents our preliminary conclusions based on the information we have. EP A is here to gather any additional information that is available, and we will fully consider all the comments that are presented today. At the hearing, participants may be asked to answer questions submitted by the audience (in writing to the Hearing Clerk) at EP A's discretion. However, EP A would prefer that all questions are raised and addressed through the cross examination procedure (40 CFR 750.20), where questions are submitted to the Hearing Clerk by July 22, 2014 (tentative) and responses are supplied by August 12, 2014 (tentative).5



# Hearing Schedule

**Time Speaker**  9:00 a.m . – 9:15 a.m. Wi lliam Noggle (EPA) – Introduction 9:15 a.m. – 9:45 a.m. Dr. Rennae Anderson 9:45 a.m. – 11:00 a.m. Presentations/Comments from hearing attendees 11:00 a.m . – 11:15 a.m . --- Break --- 11:15 a.m . – 1:00 p.m. Continue presentations/comments from hearing attendees6



# Hearing Format Hearing will be open for public comments from approximately 9:00 a.m . until 1:00 p.m. If you would like to speak, please fill out the sign - in sheet with the Hearing Clerk 

### One 15 minute break scheduled for approximately 11 :00 a.m. Doors will remain open, so feel free to come and go as needed. However, please try not to interrupt presentations7



# Hearing Contact For any questions, please contact William Noggle Noggle.william@epa.gov 703-347-8769 

### EP A We bsite for the DLA

Petition http://www.epa.gov/epawaste/hazard/tsd/pcbs/dlapcb.htm
#### § 603.1290 Participant.

A consortium member or, in the case of an agreement with a single for-profit entity, the recipient. Note that a for-profit participant may be a firm or a segment of a firm (*e.g.*, a division or other business unit).
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

PUBLIC MEETING ON STANDARDS FOR

COMMERCIAL UNITARY AIR CONDITIONERS AND HEAT PUMPS

U.S. Department of Energy

Room 1E-245 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20585

September 30, 2004



## Purpose

The Department will present its methodol ogy for the Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANOPR) analysis and example results. The Department also will explain its plans for the remaining analysis—the analysis to support the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking—and will seek input from stak eholders on its planned methodologies, assumptions, and data sources.



## Agenda

9:00-9:05 am Welcome

9:05-9:15 am Introduction and Agenda Review Doug Brookman

9:15-9:30 am Rulemaking Overview

Jim Raba This is an overview of the analyses in the rulemaking, the tools DOE uses to generate results for each analysis, and the issues on which DOE would like input during today’s meeting.

9:30-10:00 am Comments from Participants This is an open forum for participants to make a brief summary statement and/or identify their key issues regarding the ANOPR analyses, methods, and data.

10:00-11:15 am Engineering Analysis

Dave Winiarski and Aris Marantan This is a summary presentation and discussion regarding the approach used and factors considered for the market and technology assessment, screening analysis, and engineering analysis, and a characterization of the results.

11:15-11:30 am Break11:30 am-12:45 pm Life-Cycle Cost Analysis Dave Winiarski and Greg Rosenquist This is a summary presentation and discussion regarding the approach used and factors considered for the life-cycle cost analysis, building energy use and end-use load characterization, markups, and payback period analysis,

and a characterization of the results.

12:45-1:45 pm Lunch (on your own)

1:45-3:00 pm National Impact Analysis Greg Rosenquist This is a summary presentation and discussion regarding the approach used and factors considered for the national energy savings, net present value, and shipments analysis,

and a characterization of the results.

3:00-3:30 pm Discussi on of Other Issues This is an open forum to discuss any remaining questions or issues identified by participants.

3:30-3:45 pm Break

3:45-4:30 pm NOPR Analyses and Next Steps Jim McMahon, Mike Rivest and Jim Raba This is a summary presentation and discussion regarding the planned revisions to the ANOPR analyses, and the planned approach and factors that will be considered for the manufacturer, utility, employment, and regulatory impact analyses, and the environmental assessment.

4:30-5:00 pm Final Discussions This is an opportunity to discuss any remaining issues.

5:00 pm Adjourn
# L_2023164EN.01009601.xml

| 29.6.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 164/96 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.6.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 164/96

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE No 346/2022

of 9 December 2022

amending Annex XX (Environment) to the EEA Agreement [2023/1288]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (“the EEA Agreement”), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/2326 of 30 November 2021 establishing best available techniques (BAT) conclusions, under Directive 2010/75/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council, for large combustion plants (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/2326 of 30 November 2021 establishing best available techniques (BAT) conclusions, under Directive 2010/75/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council, for large combustion plants (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex XX to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex XX to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following point is inserted after point 1fw (Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2020/2009) of Annex XX to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘1fx. | 32021 D 2326: Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/2326 of 30 November 2021 establishing best available techniques (BAT) conclusions, under Directive 2010/75/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council, for large combustion plants (OJ L 469, 30.12.2021, p. 1).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘1fx.

32021 D 2326: Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/2326 of 30 November 2021 establishing best available techniques (BAT) conclusions, under Directive 2010/75/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council, for large combustion plants (OJ L 469, 30.12.2021, p. 1).’

Article 2

The text of Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/2326 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 10 December 2022, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 9 December 2022.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Kristján Andri STEFÁNSSON

---

(1)  
  OJ L 469, 30.12.2021, p. 1.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---