alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 733 

To provide for an accounting of total United States contributions to the 

United Nations. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 30, 2017 

Mr. BROOKS of Alabama introduced the following bill; which was referred to 

the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

A BILL 

To provide for an accounting of total United States 

contributions to the United Nations. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REPORT ON UNITED STATES CONTRIBUTIONS 

4 TO THE UNITED NATIONS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 90 days after the 

6 date of the enactment of this Act and annually thereafter, 

7 the Director of the Office of Management and Budget 

8 shall submit to Congress a report on all assessed and vol9 untary contributions, including in-kind, of the United 

10 States Government to the United Nations and its affiliVerDate Sep 11 2014 00:52 Feb 03, 2017 Jkt 069200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H733.IH H733

SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 733 IH

1 ated agencies and related bodies during the previous fiscal 

2 year. 

3 (b) CONTENT.—The report required under subsection 

4 (a) shall include the following elements: 

5 (1) The total amount of all assessed and vol6 untary contributions, including in-kind, of the 

7 United States Government to the United Nations 

8 and its affiliated agencies and related bodies during 

9 the previous fiscal year. 

10 (2) The approximate percentage of United 

11 States Government contributions to each United Na12 tions affiliated agency or body in such fiscal year 

13 when compared with all contributions to each such 

14 agency or body from any source in such fiscal year. 

15 (3) For each such United States Government 

16 contribution— 

17 (A) the amount of each such contribution; 

18 (B) a description of each such contribution 

19 (including whether assessed or voluntary); 

20 (C) the department or agency of the 

21 United States Government responsible for each 

22 such contribution; 

23 (D) the purpose of each such contribution; 

24 and 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 733 IH

1 (E) the United Nations or its affiliated 

2 agency or related body receiving the contribu3 tion. 

4 (c) SCOPE OF INITIAL REPORT.—The first report re5 quired under subsection (a) shall include the information 

6 required under this section for the previous three fiscal 

7 years. 

8 (d) PUBLIC AVAILABILITY OF INFORMATION.—Not 

9 later than 14 days after submitting a report required 

10 under subsection (a), the Director of the Office of Man11 agement and Budget shall post a public version of the re12 port on a text-based, searchable, and publicly available 

13 Internet Web site. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.1


Certification of Periodic Financial Report
 
 
 Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, Andrew E. Kersey, the President and Chief Executive Officer, and Jeffery A. Baird, the Chief Financial Officer of CAS Medical Systems, Inc. (the “issuer”), do hereby certify that the report on Form 10-Q accompanying this certification (the “report”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the issuer.
 
 
 
 /s/ Andrew E. Kersey
 
 Andrew E. Kersey
 President and Chief Executive Officer
 CAS Medical Systems, Inc.
 
 August 4, 2010
 
 
 
 
 /s/ Jeffery A. Baird
 
 Jeffery A. Baird
 Chief Financial Officer
 CAS Medical Systems, Inc.
 
 August 4, 2010
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

M.C., who sues by and through her )

mother and next friend, GAIL TATUM, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:06cv83-LES

) (LEAD CASE)

PACTIV CORPORATION, et al, )

)

Defendants. )

ORDER

On July 12, 2006, the court ordered the following cases consolidated for all pretrial

proceedings governed by FED. R. CIV. P. 26 through 27. 

2:06cv83-LES, M.C. v. Pactiv Corp., et al.

2:06cv84-LES, Phillips v. Pactiv Corp., et al.

2:06cv85-LES, Thompson v. Pactiv Corp., et al.

2:06cv86-LES, Edwards v. Pactiv Corp., et al.

2:06cv186-LES, Madden v. Pactiv Corp., et al.

2:06cv187-LES, Davis v. Pactiv Corp., et al.

2:06cv188-LES, Douglas v. Pactiv Corp., et al.

2:06cv189-LES, Thompson v. Pactiv Corp., et al.

2:06cv190-LES, Kelley v. Pactiv Corp., et al.

2:06cv191-LES, Cravey v. Pactiv Corp., et al.

See Doc. # 59. 

Since that date, mediation has been unsuccessful and the following additional cases have

been filed. 

2:06cv660-LES, Adams, et al., v. Pactiv Corp., et al.

2:06cv679-LES, Cassady, et al. v. Pactiv Corp., et al.

2:06cv680-LES, Brooks, et al. v. Pactiv Corp., et al.

2:06cv739-LES, Anderson et al., v. Pactiv Corp., et al.

2:06cv757-LES, Harrison, et al., v. Pactiv Corp., et al.

2:06cv758-LES, Lawrence, et al., v. Pactiv Corp., et al.

Case 2:06-cv-00758-LES-CSC Document 5 Filed 10/19/2006 Page 1 of 2
2

2:06cv759-LES, Hamilton v. Pactiv Corp., et al.

2:06cv904-LES, K.C. et al., v. Pactiv Corp., et al.

At this juncture, it appears that all of these cases should be consolidated for all pretrial

proceedings; provided, however, that at a later date, the court may unconsolidate these cases

should it become necessary. Accordingly, for good cause, it is

ORDERED that the afore-referenced cases be and are hereby CONSOLIDATED for all

pretrial proceedings. It is further

ORDERED that the above-styled case be and is hereby DESIGNATED as LEAD case,

and that all pleadings shall be filed only in the lead case.

The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to docket and place a copy of this order in each

case file referenced herein.

Counsel are reminded of M.D. ALA. LR 5.1 which governs the filing of discovery

materials in this district.

Done this 19 day of October, 2006. th

 /s/Charles S. Coody 

CHARLES S. COODY

CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00758-LES-CSC Document 5 Filed 10/19/2006 Page 2 of 2
229 So.2d 112

#### Ruthie Mae SMITH v. SCOTLAND URBAN ENTERPRISES, INC.

No. 50250.

Dec. 18, 1969.

In re: Ruthie Mae Smith applying for writs of certiorari and review.

Writ refused. The showing made does not warrant the exercise of our supervisory jurisdiction.
226 So.2d 520

#### Mrs. Bevelle Nabers CRANE, Curatrix v. SUN OIL COMPANY et al.

No. 49946.

Oct. 1, 1969.

In re: Sun Oil Company and Marine Properties, Inc., applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of Pointe Coupee. 223 So.2d 14.

It is ordered that the writ of review issue ; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be notified.

Writ granted, but limited to a consideration of assignment No. 5 relating to the issue of damages. Otherwise, the writ is denied' inasmuch as the judgment as to the remaining assignments is correct.
EX-35.5


 (logo) WELLS FARGO

Corporate Trust Services
MAC R1204-010
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045

Tel: 410 884 2000
Fax: 410 715 2380


Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation
60 Wall Street
New York, NY 10005


RE:  Annual Statement of Compliance

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as
Certificate Administrator and Paying Agent for the Eastview Mall and Commons
Mortgage Loan (in such capacity, "Wells Fargo"),hereby certifies as follows
as of and for the year ending December 31, 2012 (the "reporting period"):

(a) A review of Wells Fargo's activities during the reporting period and of its
performance under the applicable servicing agreement(s) listed on Schedule A
hereto (the "Servicing Agreement(s)") has been made under my supervision; and

(b) To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has
fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement(s) in all
material respects throughout the reporting period, except as noted on Schedule
B.



October 25, 2013

/s/ Julie Eichler
Julie Eichler
Vice President



Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

(logo) Together we'll go far

(page)


To:  Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation

Schedule A


List of Servicing Agreement(s) and Series


  1. Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of November 1, 2012, by and among
  DEUTSCHE MORTGAGE & ASSET RECEIVING CORPORATION, as Depositor, WELLS FARGO
  BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer TORCHLIGHT LOAN SERVICES, LLC,
  as Special Servicer, U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee, and PARK
  BRIDGE LENDER SERVICES LLC, as Operating Advisor and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
  as Certificate Administrator, Paying Agent and Custodian relating to the
  Series COMM 2012-CCRE4 Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates,
  relating to the Eastview Mall and Commons Mortgage Loan Combination, a pari
  passu portion of which is included in the Series COMM 2012-CCRE5 Commercial
  Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates transaction.


(page)


To:  Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation

Schedule B


Material Non-Compliance with Servicing Obligations

Not Applicable
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 605 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 605

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                     September 6, 2006.
Whereas Preston Robert ``Bob'' Tisch was born on April 29th, 1926, in the 
        Bensonhurst neighborhood of Brooklyn to a middle class family;
Whereas Bob Tisch attended Erasmus Hall High School in Brooklyn for 3 years and 
        DeWitt Clinton High School in the Bronx for one year;
Whereas Bob Tisch earned a Bachelor of Arts degree in economics from the 
        University of Michigan in 1948;
Whereas in 1948 Bob Tisch joined a family hotel business venture, the Laurel-in-
        the-Pines in Lakewood, New Jersey, establishing the foundation for his 
        success;
Whereas from 1946 through 1959 Bob and Larry Tisch built a thriving hotel chain 
        spanning New York, New Jersey, and Florida;
Whereas in 1959 Bob and Larry Tisch acquired a controlling interest in Loew's 
        Theatres, consisting of 102 movie theatres and a New York radio station, 
        WMGM;
Whereas the investment in Loew's Theatres formed the basis for the modern-day 
        Loews Corporation, which was created in 1969;
Whereas Bob and Larry Tisch built Loews Corporation into one of the largest 
        diversified financial corporations in the United States;
Whereas in 1986 Bob Tisch was appointed by the Board of Governors of the United 
        States Postal Service as Postmaster General under the administration of 
        President Ronald Reagan;
Whereas in 1991 Bob Tisch purchased a 50 percent share in the New York Giants 
        Football Club;
Whereas Bob Tisch helped create the Meals-on-Wheels program and served as its 
        president for over 10 years, frequently delivering meals himself;
Whereas Bob Tisch founded the Take the Field program, a program which during the 
        1990s raised over $100,000,000 in public and private funds to rebuild 43 
        athletic fields in New York City for the use of hundreds of thousands of 
        public school students;
Whereas Bob Tisch gave countless millions of dollars to hospitals, charities, 
        and universities in the spirit of improving the lives of Americans;
Whereas on November 15, 2005, Bob Tisch died of a brain tumor at the age of 79; 
        and
Whereas the life of Bob Tisch serves as a model for self-made success and 
        positive American philanthropy: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives, on the occasion of the death of 
Preston Robert Tisch--
            (1) expresses its deepest condolences to his wife of 57 years Joan 
        and their 3 children; and
            (2) recognizes the outstanding contributions Preston Robert Tisch 
        made throughout his life to New York City, the New York Giants Football 
        Club, the National Football League, and the United States.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
#### In the Matter of Noel Feustel, Appellant, v Robert L. Garfínkle et al., Respondents.

[813 NYS2d 919]

In a proceeding pursuant to Election Law § 16-102, inter alia, to invalidate a petition nominating Scott S. Rosenblum as a candidate of the Preservation Party for the Public Office of Mayor of the Village of Saltaire in the general election to be held on May 26, 2006, the petitioner appeals from so much of a final order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Burke, J.), dated May 11, 2006, as granted the petition only to the extent of remitting the matter to the Suffolk County Board of Elections to “immediately take all steps necessary to render a determination on the questions raised by the petitioner’s objections and specifications.”

Ordered that the order is modified, on the law, by deleting the provision thereof remitting the matter to the Suffolk County Board of Elections to “immediately take all steps necessary to render a determination on the questions raised by the petitioner’s objections and specifications” and substituting therefor a provision granting the petition to the extent of remitting the matter to the Suffolk County Board of Elections to render a determination after a ministerial examination of the petitioner’s objections and specifications; as so modified, the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements, *833and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, for a determination of the objections involving matters not appearing on the face of the candidate’s petition, including fraud *(see Matter of Feustel v Garfinkle,*29 AD 3d 831 [2006] [decided herewith]). Krausman, J.P., Goldstein, Skelos and Lunn, JJ., concur.
#### Avco Security Systems, Inc., Respondent, v Linda T. Beigel, Appellant.

[816 NYS2d 512]

In an action to recover damages for conversion, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Werner, J.), dated June 27, 2005, which denied her motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint based on the doctrines of res judicata and collateral estoppel.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed.

The plaintiff, Avco Security Systems, Inc. (hereinafter Avco), commenced this action against the defendant, Linda T. Beigel, alleging that she converted various property belonging to it. The president, sole shareholder, and sole director of Avco is Linda’s former husband, Larry Beigel. The two divorced in an acrimonious action that was resolved by a stipulation of settlement entered into in open court. The defendant moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the grounds that the action was barred by the doctrines of res judicata and collateral estoppel arising from the stipulation of settlement in the matrimonial action. In support of her motion, the defendant demonstrated, prima facie, that the issue of the ownership and possession of all of the property at issue herein (which was potentially marital property subject to equitable distribution) was actually litigated and resolved in the matrimonial action *(see Xiao Yang Chen v Fischer,*6 NY3d 94,100-101 [2005]; *Watts v Swiss Bank Corp.,*27 NY2d 270, 277 [1970]; *Luscher v Arrua,*21 AD3d 1005, 1006-1007 [2005]; *Matter of State of New York v Seaport Manor A.C.F.,*19 AD3d 609 [2005]; *Morse v Morse,*12 AD3d 425 [2004]), and that Avco shall be bound by the determination therein *(see Matter of Shea,*309 NY 605; *Shire Realty Corp. v Schorr,*55 AD2d 356, 360-361 [1977]). In opposition, *838Avco failed to raise a triable issue of fact. Thus, the defendant’s motion should have been granted. Miller, J.P., Ritter, Skelos and Lifson, JJ, concur.
IV 

House Calendar No. 124 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 727 

[Report No. 115–547] 

Providing for consideration of the Senate amendment to the bill (H.R. 1892) 

to amend title 4, United States Code, to provide for the flying of 

the flag at half-staff in the event of the death of a first responder 

in the line of duty. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 6, 2018 

Mr. SESSIONS, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the Senate amendment to the 

bill (H.R. 1892) to amend title 4, United States Code, 

to provide for the flying of the flag at half-staff in 

the event of the death of a first responder in the line 

of duty. 

1 Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it 

2 shall be in order to take from the Speaker’s table the bill 

3 (H.R. 1892) to amend title 4, United States Code, to pro4 vide for the flying of the flag at half-staff in the event 

5 of the death of a first responder in the line of duty, with 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 727 RH 

1 the Senate amendment thereto, and to consider in the 

2 House, without intervention of any point of order, a mo3 tion offered by the chair of the Committee on Appropria4 tions or his designee that the House concur in the Senate 

5 amendment with an amendment consisting of the text of 

6 Rules Committee Print 115-58 modified by the amend7 ment printed in the report of the Committee on Rules ac8 companying this resolution. The Senate amendment and 

9 the motion shall be considered as read. The motion shall 

10 be debatable for one hour equally divided and controlled 

11 by the chair and ranking minority member of the Com12 mittee on Appropriations. The previous question shall be 

13 considered as ordered on the motion to its adoption with14 out intervening motion. 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS

daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
House Calendar No. 124 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 727 

[Report No. 115–547] 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the Senate amenda first responder in the line of duty. the flag at half-staff in the event of the death of United States Code, to provide for the flying of ment to the bill (H.R. 1892) to amend title 4, 

FEBRUARY 6, 2018 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
**Idaho**

**Idaho 10 Nez Perce**
#### In the Matter of Joseph Goldstein, Appellant, v. William D. Meisser et al., Constituting the Board of Elections of Nassau County, and Stanley Harwood, Respondents.

In a proceeding to invalidate petitions designating respondent Stanley Harwood as a candidate in the Liberal Party Primary Election to be held on June 23, 1970 for nomination for the public office of Member of the Assembly for the 11th Assembly District, Nassau County, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered June 8, 1970, which denied the application. Judgment affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Christ, P. J., Rabin, Hopkins, Kleinfeld and Brennan, JJ., concur.
EX-31 Rule13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications.

 

 

I, Leah Nivison,certify that:

 

1. I have reviewedthis report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed inrespect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of the GS MortgageSecurities Trust 2013-GC10 (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

 

2. Based on myknowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 

 

3. Based on myknowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required tobe provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is includedin the Exchange Act periodic reports; 

 

4. Based on myknowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report underItem 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Actperiodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under theservicing agreements in all material respects; and

 

5. All of the reportson assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securitiesand their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance withservicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in thisreport in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except asotherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliancedescribed in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving thecertifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me bythe following unaffiliated parties:

 

Wells Fargo Bank,National Association, as Master Servicer, LNR Partners, LLC, as SpecialServicer, U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, Wells Fargo Bank,National Association, as Certificate Administrator, Wells Fargo Bank, NationalAssociation, as Custodian, TriMont Real Estate Advisors, Inc., as OperatingAdvisor, CoreLogic Commercial Real Estate Services, Inc., as Servicing FunctionParticipant, and National Tax Search, LLC, as Servicing Function Participant.

 

 

 

Dated: March 25, 2019

 

 

/s/ Leah Nivison

 

 

Chief ExecutiveOfficer

(seniorofficer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
5303.1104  Mitigation or Waiver       (b) See MP5301.601(a)(i).     **Parent topic:** Subpart 5303.11 - PREVENTING PERSONAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST FOR CONTRACTOR EMPLOYEES PERFORMING ACQUISITION FUNCTIONS
PGI 244.305-70 Policy.

(c) Disposition of findings.

(2) Initial determination.

(ii)(A) Within 10 days of receiving the report, if the contracting officer makes a determination that

there is a significant deficiency, the contracting officer should provide an initial determination of

deficiencies and a copy of the report to the contractor and require the contractor to submit a written

response.

(C) Evaluation of contractor's response. Within 30 days of receiving the contractor’s response, the

contracting officer, in consultation with the auditor or cognizant functional specialist, should

evaluate the contractor’s response and make a final determination.

(3) Final Determination.

(ii)(A) Monitoring contractors’ corrective action. The contracting officer and Purchasing System

Analyst (PSA) or auditor shall monitor the contractor's progress in correcting deficiencies. If the

contractor fails to make adequate progress, the contracting officer shall take whatever action is

necessary to ensure that the contractor corrects the deficiencies. Examples of actions the

contracting officer can take are: withdraw or withhold approval of the system; bringing the issue to

the attention of higher level management, implementing or increasing the withholding in accordance

with 252.242-7005, Contractor Business Systems, and recommending non-award of potential

contracts.

(B) Correction of significant deficiencies.

(1) When the contractor notifies the contracting officer that the contractor has corrected the

significant deficiencies, the contracting officer shall request the PSA or auditor to review the

correction to determine if the deficiencies have been resolved.

(2) The contracting officer shall determine if the contractor has corrected the deficiencies.

(3) If the contracting officer determines the contractor has corrected the deficiencies, the

contracting officer's notification shall be sent to the PSA; auditor; payment office; appropriate action

officers responsible for reporting past performance at the requiring activities; and each contracting

and contract administration office having substantial business with the contractor as applicable.

Parent topic: PGI 244.305 RESERVED