alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications.

 

 

I, Helaine M. Kaplan, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-Drequired to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of the COMM 2013-CCRE6 Mortgage Trust (the "ExchangeAct periodic reports");

 

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as awhole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered bythis report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other informationrequired to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements requiredin this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers havefulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and

 

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteriafor asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backedsecurities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances ofnoncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on informationprovided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:

 

Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, Midland LoanServices, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, as Special Servicer, U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, Park BridgeLender Services LLC, as Operating Advisor, CoreLogic Commercial Real Estate Services, Inc., as Servicing Function Participant,National Tax Search, LLC, as Servicing Function Participant, Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association,as Primary Servicer for the Moffett Towers Mortgage Loan, Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as Special Servicer for the Moffett TowersMortgage Loan, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee and Certificate Administrator for the Moffett Towers MortgageLoan, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Custodian for the Moffett Towers Mortgage Loan, and Park Bridge Lender ServicesLLC, as Operating Advisor for the Moffett Towers Mortgage Loan.

 

 

 

Dated: March 25, 2019

 

 

/s/ Helaine M. Kaplan

 

 

President

(senior officer in charge of securitization ofthe depositor)
#### Arthur Wick, Trustee in Bankruptcy of Estate of Karl F. Goy, Appellant, v. Elizabeth O. Weiler, Appellee.

Gen. No. 41,048.

opinion filed June 24, 1940.

John A. Niemeyer and George B. Cohen, for appellant; P. P. Flick, for appellee.

Opinion by

Presiding Justice Matchett.

“Not to be published in full.’’
§ 611.103 Application evaluation. ( a ) *Eligibility screening.* Applications will be reviewed to determine whether the applicant is eligible, the information required under § 611.101 is complete, and the proposed loan complies with applicable statutes and regulations. DOE can at any time reject an application, in whole or in part, that does not meet these requirements. Any additional information submitted to DOE will be treated as provided in 10 CFR 600.15 and must be marked as provided in 10 CFR 600.15(b).
( b ) *Evaluation criteria.* Applications that are determined to be eligible pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section shall be subject to a substantive review by DOE based upon factors that include, but are not limited to, the following: ( 1 ) The technical merit of the proposed advanced technology vehicles or qualifying components, with greater weight given for factors including, but not limited to: ( i ) Improved vehicle fuel economy above that required for an advanced technology vehicle;
( ii ) Potential contributions to improved fuel economy of the U.S. light-duty vehicle fleet;
( iii ) Likely reductions in petroleum use by the U.S. light-duty fleet; and
( iv ) Promotion of use of advanced fuel (e.g., E85, ultra-low sulfur diesel).
( 2 ) Technical Program Factors such as economic development and diversity in technology, company, risk, and geographic location.
( 3 ) The adequacy of the proposed provisions to protect the Government, including sufficiency of Security, the priority of the lien position in the Security, and the percentage of the project to be financed with the loan.
( 4 ) In making loans to those manufacturers that have existing facilities, priority will be given to those facilities that are oldest or have been in existence for at least 20 years even if such facilities are idle at the time of application.
[73 FR 66731, Nov. 12, 2008, as amended at 76 FR 26583, May 9, 2011]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           1,737
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,084
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      3,580
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                10,630
<PP&E>                                             937
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  11,890
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,415
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           669
<OTHER-SE>                                     174,383
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    11,890
<SALES>                                         11,804
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                11,804
<CGS>                                           10,694
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,652
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   1
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (543)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (543)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (543)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.01)
        


</TABLE>
#### § 205.193A Submission of ERA supplemental information.

Within 20 days after service of a Notice of Objection to a Proposed Remedial Order the ERA may serve, upon the person to whom the Proposed Remedial Order was directed, supplemental information relating to the calculations and determinations which support the findings of fact set forth in the Proposed Remedial Order.
#### In the Matter of Joseph Sole, Respondent, v Elonzo Draffin et al., Respondents, and Arthur J. Carlsen et al., Constituting the Board of Elections of the County of Erie, Appellants. Erie,

Order unanimously reversed, without costs, petition dismissed and designating petition reinstated. Memorandum: After objection and presentation of specifications by petitioner pursuant to section 6-154 of the Election Law, the Board of Elections of Erie County validated the designating petition of Elonzo Draffin and Maria A. • Michaux for the party position of County Committeeman for the 60th Election District, City of Buffalo. Petitioner commenced this proceeding pursuant to section 16-102 of the Election Law to invalidate the designating petition of Draffin and Michaux. The designating petition consists of two pages: page one thereof bearing four signatures and page two thereof bearing six signatures. Special Term properly invalidated five of the six signatures on page two on the ground that the signers were not registered voters in the election district. The only issue before us is whether Special Term properly invalidated four signatures on page one because it was subscribed by two attesting witnesses. We hold that respondent candidates have strictly complied with the Election Law (see Election Law, § 6-132; and *Matter of Higby v Mahoney,*48 NY2d 15), and the inclusion of an additional *574subscribing witness does not fatally taint the designating petition. (Appeal from order of Erie Supreme Court—Election Law.) Present—Dillon, P. J., Hancock, Jr., Schnepp, Doerr and Witmer, JJ. (Decided Aug. 21, 1980.)
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 666 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 666

  Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to observe a 60-
second moment of silence in the House for those killed by gun violence 
    in the United States on the next legislative day after any such 
                            individual dies.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 15, 2017

 Mr. Raskin submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                         the Committee on Rules

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to observe a 60-
second moment of silence in the House for those killed by gun violence 
    in the United States on the next legislative day after any such 
                            individual dies.

    Resolved, That rule XIV of the Rules of the House of 
Representatives is amended by adding at the end the following new 
clause:
    ``7. There shall be a 60-second moment of silence in the House for 
victims of firearm homicide in the United States on the next 
legislative day after any such individual dies.''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report  of The  Topps  Company,  Inc.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended November 27, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Arthur
T.  Shorin,  Chairman  and Chief  Executive  Officer  of the  Company,  certify,
pursuant  to  18  U.S.C.   ss.1350,   as  adopted  pursuant  to  ss.906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.







                                                   s/ Arthur T. Shorin
                                                   -----------------------
                                                      Arthur T. Shorin
                                            Chairman and Chief Executive Officer



January 6, 2005
Seismic Safety

| RUS is revising its existing regulations concerning    seismic safety. The proposed revision to 7 CFR Part 1792, Subpart C,    would update and simplify the seismic safety requirements for new building construction    using RUS or RTB loan, grant or guaranteed funds or funds provided through lien    accommodations or subordinations approved by RUS or RTB.

The proposed revision also changes the list of acceptable model codes    and standards for which new buildings are to meet seismic provisions. According to a    recent study commissioned by the Interagency Committee on Seismic Safety in Construction,    the model codes and standards which are equivalent to the 1994 NEHRP Recommended    Provisions are the 1997 ICBO Uniform Building Code (UBC) and the ASCE 7-95 Minimum Design    Loads for Buildings and Other Structures.

If you would like more information or have any questions, please call    Don Heald, Structural Engineer, Transmission Branch, at (202) 720-9102.
 

[Abbreviations] [Returnto Table of Contents] |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
-FA 1'\- .2..010 -0 .L;LO

Contacts. With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed?

Organization Person Contacted Date Response

National Business Aircraft Association Eli Cotti tJ'410tl ~

Regional Airline Association Dave Lotterer

511~JO'£ -

Aircraft Owners & Pilots Associatioll Robert Hackman ~11"/o'6 -

ATA Craig Fabian (1,,,104. -

09/29/06
Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed 

February 27, 2024

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-23-00443-CV

IN THE MATTER OF R.D.D., Appellant

On Appeal from the 314th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2021-00909J

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This is an appeal from a final determination order signed on May 8, 2023. 

See Tex. Fam. Code Ann. §§ 54.04; 56.01(c)(1)(C). The final order determined 

that appellant, a juvenile, engaged in delinquent conduct and committed him to the 

custody of the Texas Juvenile Justice Department for ten years with a possible 

transfer to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice.

Appellant has filed a motion to voluntarily dismiss this appeal. Appellant’s 

motion is signed by appellant and states that appellant knowingly waives his 
2

appeal and understands the possible consequences of waiving the appeal. 

Appellant’s motion is sufficient to show that he has knowingly and voluntarily 

waived his right to appeal. See Tex. Fam. Code § 51.09; In the Matter of A.S.H., 

615 S.W.3d 699 (Tex. App.—Amarillo 2021, no pet.); In the Matter of E.S., No. 

03-23-00231-CV, 2023 WL 4405466 (Tex. App.—Austin July 7, 2023, no pet.).

Accordingly, we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 

42.1(a)(1).

PER CURIAM 

Panel consists of Justices Wise, Spain, and Hassan.
#### Howard K. Morse, Appellant, v. Association of Arts and Industries, Appellee.

Gen. No. 41,068.

Burke, J., dissenting.

opinion filed June 19, 1940.

Burry, *264Johnstone, Peters & Dixon, for appellant; John O. Trussell, of counsel; Wetten, Pegler & Dale, for appellee.

Opinion by

Presiding Justice Denis E. Sullivan.

“Not to be published in full.”
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 3.1C

                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                       TO
                          CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                          IMCLONE SYSTEMS INCORPORATED

                Under Section 242 of the General Corporation Law
                            Of the State of Delaware



 The undersigned, being the President and CEO of IMCLONE SYSTEMS INCORPORATED, a

Delaware corporation (the "Corporation") DOES HEREBY CERTIFY as follows:

        FIRST: This Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation is
                       hereby amended so that Article

FOURTH (a) shall read in its entirety as follows:

                  "FOURTH: (a) The total number of shares of capital stock which
                  the Corporation shall have the authority to issue is two
                  hundred million (200,000,000) shares of Common Stock with a
                  par value of one tenth of one cent ($.001) per share and four
                  million (4,000,000) shares of Preferred Stock with a par value
                  of one dollar ($1.00) per share"

         SECOND: That such amendment was duly adopted by the Board of Directors

of the Corporation and by the Stockholders of the Corporation in accordance with

Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.

         IN WITNESS THEREOF, this Certificate of Amendment to the Certificate of

Incorporation has been signed, and the statements made herein affirmed as true

under the penalties of perjury, this 9th day of August 2002.


                                                     /S/ Harlan W. Waksal
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     Harlan W. Waksal
                                                     President and CEO
/S/ Daniel S. Lynch
-------------------------
Daniel S. Lynch
Secretary
PGI 249.105-1 Termination status reports.

When the contract administration office receives a termination notice, it will—

(1) Prepare a DD Form 1598, Contract Termination Status Report;

(2) Within 30 days, send one copy to the purchasing office and one copy to the headquarters office to

which the contract administration office is directly responsible;

(3) Continue reporting semiannually to cover the six-month periods ending March and September.

The semiannual reports must be submitted within 30 days after the end of the reporting period; and

(4) Submit a final report within 30 days after closing the termination case.

Parent topic: PGI 249.105 Duties of termination contracting officer after issuance of notice of

termination.
PGI Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation

PGI Part 227 - TECHNICAL DATA AND ASSOCIATED RIGHTS

PGI Part 228 - BONDS AND INSURANCE

PGI Part 229 - TAXES

PGI Part 230 - COST ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

PGI Part 231 - CONTRACT COST PRINCIPLES AND PROCEDURES

PGI Part 232 - CONTRACT FINANCING

PGI Part 233 - PROTESTS, DISPUTES, AND APPEALS

Parent topic: PGI Subchapter E - GENERAL CONTRACTING REQUIREMENTS
IV 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 313 

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to exclude certain 

provisions relating to water resources development projects of the Corps 

of Engineers or the Bureau of Reclamation from the definition of congressional earmark, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 3, 2017 

Mr. THOMAS J. ROONEY of Florida submitted the following resolution; which 

was referred to the Committee on Rules 

RESOLUTION 

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to 

exclude certain provisions relating to water resources development projects of the Corps of Engineers or the 

Bureau of Reclamation from the definition of congressional earmark, and for other purposes. 

Whereas the Rules of the House of Representatives define an 

earmark as a Member request for funding targeted to a 

specific State, locality, or congressional district, other 

than through a statutory or administrative formula-driven or competitive award process; 

Whereas the Congressional Research Service reports that 85 

percent of Corps of Engineers projects (Corps projects) 

and 75 percent of Bureau of Reclamation projects (Reclamation projects) are geographically specific studies or 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 313 IH 

projects, and the appropriation of funds for Corps and 

Reclamation projects is not determined through a formula-driven or competitive award process; and 

Whereas the appropriation of funds for Corps and Reclamation projects is not intended to supersede applicable allocation authorities under section 302(a) of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 (2 U.S.C. 633(a)), or to preclude the requirement that a Corps or Reclamation 

project receive an authorization prior to the allocation of 

appropriations for the project: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, 

2 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

3 This resolution may be cited as the ‘‘Responsible En4 vironmental Preservation and American Infrastructure 

5 Restoration Resolution’’ or the ‘‘REPAIR Resolution’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EXCLUSION OF CERTAIN WATER RESOURCES DE7 VELOPMENT PROJECTS FROM DEFINITION 

8 OF CONGRESSIONAL EARMARK. 

9 Clause 9(e) of rule XXI of the Rules of the House 

10 of Representatives is amended— 

11 (1) by striking ‘‘(e) For the purpose’’ and in12 serting ‘‘(e)(1) For the purpose’’; and 

13 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

14 ‘‘(2) For the purpose of this clause, the term ‘con15 gressional earmark’ does not include a provision or report 

16 language described in subparagraph (1) if the provision 

17 or report language provides, authorizes, or recommends an 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 313 IH 

1 amount of discretionary budget authority for a project of 

2 the Corps of Engineers or the Bureau of Reclamation.’’. 

Æ 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS