alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7257 

To amend title 31, United States Code, to require $1 coins issued during 

2019 to honor President George H. W. Bush and to direct the Secretary 

of the Treasury to issue bullion coins during 2019 in honor of Barbara 

Bush. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 11, 2018 

Mr. POLIQUIN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To amend title 31, United States Code, to require $1 coins 

issued during 2019 to honor President George H. W. 

Bush and to direct the Secretary of the Treasury to 

issue bullion coins during 2019 in honor of Barbara 

Bush. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘President George H. 

5 W. Bush and Barbara Bush Dollar Coin Act’’. 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7257 IH

1 SEC. 2. COINS HONORING PRESIDENT GEORGE H. W. BUSH 

2 AND BARBARA BUSH. 

3 (a) CIRCULATING $1 COINS HONORING PRESIDENT

4 GEORGE H. W. BUSH.—Notwithstanding subsections (d), 

5 (n)(2)(E), (n)(3), (n)(4), and (n)(8) of section 5112 of 

6 title 31, United States Code, in addition to the coins to 

7 be issued pursuant to section 5112(r) of such title, and 

8 in accordance with the other provisions of section 5112(n) 

9 of such title, $1 coins issued during the 1-year period be10 ginning January 1, 2019, shall bear the image of Presi11 dent George H. W. Bush. 

12 (b) BULLION COINS HONORING BARBARA BUSH.— 

13 Notwithstanding paragraphs (1) and (5)(C) of section 

14 5112(o) of title 31, United States Code, and in accordance 

15 with the other provisions of section 5112(o) of such title, 

16 the Secretary of the Treasury shall issue bullion coins dur17 ing the 1-year period beginning January 1, 2019, that 

18 bear the image of Barbara Bush. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
First Amendment to Employment Agreement


 Exhibit 10.1 
 First Amendment to Employment Agreement 
 This First Amendment to Employment Agreement (this
“Amendment”) is made by and between W&T Offshore, Inc., a Texas corporation (the “Company”) and William Talafuse (“Key Employee”). 
 WITNESSETH: 
 WHEREAS, the Company and Key Employee are parties to that certain Employment
Agreement dated effective September 28, 2005 (the “Original Agreement”); and 
 WHEREAS, the Company and Key Employee
desire to amend the Original Agreement in certain respects as provided herein. 
 NOW THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the
foregoing and the agreements contained herein, the Company and Key Employee do hereby agree as follows: 
  

	 	1.	Defined Terms. Unless otherwise defined herein, capitalized terms used herein shall have the same meaning ascribed thereto in the Original Agreement.


  

	 	2.	Amendment. Section 2.1 of the Original Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following: 

 “2.1 Term. Unless sooner terminated pursuant to other provisions hereof, the Company agrees to employ Key Employee for the period
beginning on the Effective Date and ending on the third anniversary of the Effective Date; provided, however, that beginning on the first anniversary from the Effective Date, and on each anniversary date thereafter, if this Agreement has not been
terminated pursuant to paragraph 2.2 or 2.3, then said term of employment shall automatically be extended for an additional one-year period unless on or before the date that is 90 days prior to the first day of any such extension period either party
shall give written notice to the other that no such automatic extension shall occur.” 
  

	 	3.	Ratification. As amended herein, the Original Agreement remains in full force and effect. The term “Agreement” shall hereafter mean the Original Agreement as
amended by this Amendment. 

 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment on the 18th day of July 2006, to be effective as of the Effective Date. 
  

			
	W&T OFFSHORE, INC.
		
	By:	 	 /S/ Tracy W. Krohn

	Name:	 	Tracy W. Krohn
	Title:	 	Chief Executive Officer
		 	“COMPANY”
		
	By:	 	 /S/ William Talafuse

	Name:	 	William Talafuse
		 	“KEY EMPLOYEE”
§ 71.5 Transportation of licensed material. ( a ) Each licensee who transports licensed material outside the site of usage, as specified in the NRC license, or where transport is on public highways, or who delivers licensed material to a carrier for transport, shall comply with the applicable requirements of the DOT regulations in 49 CFR parts 107, 171 through 180, and 390 through 397, appropriate to the mode of transport. ( 1 ) The licensee shall particularly note DOT regulations in the following areas: ( i ) Packaging—49 CFR part 173: subparts A, B, and I.
( ii ) Marking and labeling—49 CFR part 172: subpart D; and §§ 172.400 through 172.407 and §§ 172.436 through 172.441 of subpart E.
( iii ) Placarding—49 CFR part 172: subpart F, especially §§ 172.500 through 172.519 and 172.556; and appendices B and C.
( iv ) Accident reporting—49 CFR part 171: §§ 171.15 and 171.16.
( v ) Shipping papers and emergency information—49 CFR part 172: subparts C and G.
( vi ) Hazardous material employee training—49 CFR part 172: subpart H.
( vii ) Security plans—49 CFR part 172: subpart I.
( viii ) Hazardous material shipper/carrier registration—49 CFR part 107: subpart G.
( 2 ) The licensee shall also note DOT regulations pertaining to the following modes of transportation: ( i ) Rail—49 CFR part 174: subparts A through D and K.
( ii ) Air—49 CFR part 175.
( iii ) Vessel—49 CFR part 176: subparts A through F and M.
( iv ) Public Highway—49 CFR part 177 and parts 390 through 397.
( b ) If DOT regulations are not applicable to a shipment of licensed material, the licensee shall conform to the standards and requirements of the DOT specified in paragraph (a) of this section to the same extent as if the shipment or transportation were subject to DOT regulations. A request for modification, waiver, or exemption from those requirements, and any notification referred to in those requirements, must be filed with, or made to, the Director, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001.
[69 FR 3786, Jan. 26, 2004; 69 FR 58038, Sept. 29, 2004]
Exhibit 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION
                           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Perkins Oil & Gas, Inc.
(the "Company") for the year ended June 30, 2012, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), J. Michael Page, as
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act oF 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date: October 15, 2013                By: /s/ J. Michael Page
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          J. Michael Page
                                          Chief Executive Officer

This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of ss.18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Case 2:06-cv-00669-MEF-SRW Document 11 Filed 11/01/2006 Page 1 of 4
Case 2:06-cv-00669-MEF-SRW Document 11 Filed 11/01/2006 Page 2 of 4
Case 2:06-cv-00669-MEF-SRW Document 11 Filed 11/01/2006 Page 3 of 4
Case 2:06-cv-00669-MEF-SRW Document 11 Filed 11/01/2006 Page 4 of 4
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 594 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 594

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                     December 13, 2005.
Whereas John D. Dingell learned firsthand about the institution of Capitol Hill 
        at an early age, serving as a House of Representatives Page from 1938 to 
        1943;
Whereas John D. Dingell served his country during the World War II as a member 
        of the United States Army;
Whereas John D. Dingell has served 50 years in the House of Representatives, 
        since succeeding his late father, the Honorable John David Dingell, Sr., 
        a 12-term incumbent, in a special election to the 84th Congress on 
        December 13, 1955;
Whereas a member of the Dingell family has represented the Detroit metropolitan 
        area in the House of Representatives since 1933;
Whereas John D. Dingell, the Dean of the House of Representatives since the 
        104th Congress, is the longest serving current Member of the House of 
        Representatives, having been re-elected on 25 subsequent occasions;
Whereas John D. Dingell's term of service is the third-longest term of service 
        in the history of the House of Representatives and the fifth-longest in 
        Congressional history; and
Whereas John D. Dingell has served on the Energy and Commerce Committee (and its 
        predecessors) since the 85th Congress in 1957, and chaired that panel 
        from the 97th through the 103rd Congresses (1981-1995): Now, therefore, 
        be it
    Resolved,

SECTION 1. HONORING THE 50TH ANNIVERSARY OF JOHN D. DINGELL'S SERVICE IN THE 
              HOUSE.

    The House of Representatives--
            (1) honors the lifelong commitment of the Honorable John D. Dingell 
        to the ideals of our Nation;
            (2) recognizes the Honorable John D. Dingell's half-century of 
        exceptional dedication to his constituents, to the State of Michigan, 
        and to the United States; and
            (3) congratulates the Honorable John D. Dingell on 50 years of 
        superior service in the United States Congress.

SEC. 2. TRANSMISSION OF ENROLLED RESOLUTION.

    The Clerk of the House of Representatives shall transmit an enrolled copy of 
this resolution to the Honorable John D. Dingell.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
#### Montgomery *v.*Alexander Lumber Company.

Lumpkin, J.

1. Under former rulings of this court, which are binding, where a contract is required to be evidenced by writing, under the statute of frauds, and a petition sets out the' terms of a contract, but does not allege that it is in writing, such petition is not demurrable for that reason. *Allen & Holmes*v. *Powell,*125 *Ga.*438 (54 S. E. 137).

2. Remote or consequential damages are not generally allowed when they can not be traced solely to the breach of the contract, or unless they are capable of exact computation, such as the profits which are the immediate fruit of the contract, and are independent of any collateral enterprise entered into in contemplation of the contract. Civil Code, § 4394.

3. Where it is sought to recover damages on account of loss’ of profits of . a contract, under the rule that damages recoverable for .a breach of contract are' such as arise naturally and according to the usual course of things from such breach, and such as the parties contemplated, *52when the contrast was made, as the probable result of the breach (Civil Code, § 4395), or on the ground that the contract was broken with the knowledge and for the purpose of depriving the party injured of its benefits (Civil Code, § 4511), the plaintiff should allege facts showing that the special damages claimed fall within one or the other of such rules.

May 15, 1913.

Action for breach of contract. Before Judge Pendleton. Fulton superior court. June 10, 1912.

*Qopeland & White*and *A. C. Corbett,*for plaintiff.

*Watlcins & Latimer,*for defendant.

4. A petition seeking to recover damages for a breach of contract and also for a tort is subject to demurrer.

5. The allegations as to damages were general in character, and failed to show a right to recover the special damages alleged. The petition was also demurrable because it sought to recover both for a tort and on a contract in the same action. A demurrer was filed on the ground of such misjoinder of causes of action; and there were also special demurrers to the paragraphs of the petition alleging damages. Theseourt sustained the demurrers, with leave to the plaintiff to amend; but upon failure of the plaintiff to do so, the action was dismissed. *Held,*that this was not error.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>  THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM
THE REGISTRANT'S 10-QSB AS FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         407,260
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,391,937
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (652,644)
<INVENTORY>                                    285,784
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,786,928
<PP&E>                                       2,931,087
<DEPRECIATION>                             (2,179,199)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              13,098,514
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,355,559
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       396,408
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,574,652
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                13,098,514
<SALES>                                      1,822,385
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,822,385
<CGS>                                        1,126,775
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,260,505
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               150,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           (197,066)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,635,186)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,635,186)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,635,186)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.42)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.42)


</TABLE>
exv10w25









Exhibit 10.25




Amendment

To the

The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Employee Retirement Plan Supplement




     Effective
as of January 1, 2010, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Employee
Retirement Plan Supplement (the “MH ERPS”), amended and restated as of January
1, 2008, unless otherwise provided, is amended as set forth below.



     1. Article 5 of the MH ERPS is amended to incorporate new Section 5.05, as set forth
below:




Section 5.05. Distribution of Benefits Due to FICA. If any
Benefits under this Plan are taxable to a Participant under the Federal Insurance
Contributions Act (FICA) (as a result of Section 3101, 3121(a) or 3121(v)(2) of the
Code or any successor provisions) (the “FICA Tax”) prior to the date the Benefits
become payable to the Participant in accordance with terms of this Plan, then the
Company may determine, in its sole discretion, that a lump sum distribution shall
be made from this Plan in an amount equal to: (i) the FICA Tax payable on any such
Benefits; (ii) the income tax at source on wages imposed under Section 3401 of the
Code or the corresponding withholding provisions of applicable state, local or
foreign tax laws as a result of the payment of the FICA Tax under subsection (i) of
this Section 5.05 of the Plan; plus (iii) the additional income tax at
source on wages attributable to the pyramiding Section 3401 of the Code wages and
taxes, in accordance with Section 409A of the Code (the amounts under subsections
(i); (ii) and (iii) collectively, the “Accelerated Tax Payment”). The total amount
of any accelerated distributions for a Participant must not exceed the aggregate of
the FICA amount and the income tax withholding related to such FICA amount. In the
event that the Accelerated Tax Payment is distributed, the Participant’s Benefit
shall be reduced by such Accelerated Tax Payment.



* * * * *




     Except as set forth herein, the MH ERPS remains in full force and effect.
#### § 600.360 Purpose.

Sections 600.361 through 600.363 contain procedures for closeout and for subsequent disallowances and adjustments.
#### KENNEDY, Appellant, v. HECKSCHER, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

June 12, 1914.)

Action by John Kennedy against August Heckscher.

No opinion. Order unanimously affirmed, with costs.
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 892 

To adjust the amount of monthly old-age, survivors, and disability insurance 

payments under title II of the Social Security Act based on localitybased comparability payment rates. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 6, 2017 

Ms. MENG introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To adjust the amount of monthly old-age, survivors, and 

disability insurance payments under title II of the Social 

Security Act based on locality-based comparability payment rates. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Locality-based Social 

5 Security Benefits Act of 2017’’. 


emcdonald on DSK9F6TC42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 892 IH

1 SEC. 2. SOCIAL SECURITY BENEFIT AMOUNTS ADJUSTED 

2 TO REFLECT LOCALITY-BASED COM3 PARABILITY PAYMENT RATES. 

4 Notwithstanding title II of the Social Security Act, 

5 the Commissioner of Social Security shall increase the 

6 monthly benefit amount to which each individual is other7 wise entitled under such title by the percentage deter8 mined by the President under sections 5304 and 5304a 

9 of title 5, United States Code, for the locality pay area 

10 (as established in section 531.603 of title 5, Code of Fed11 eral Regulations) in which the individual resides at the 

12 time of such increase. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK9F6TC42PROD with BILLS
#### § 455.72 Scope of the grant.

Financial assistance awarded under this subpart may be expended for the design (excluding design costs funded under the technical assistance program), acquisition, and installation of energy conservation measures to reduce energy consumption or measures to allow the use of renewable resources in schools and hospitals or to shift energy usage to periods of low demand and cost. Such measures include, but are not necessarily limited to, those included in the definition of “energy conservation measure” in § 455.2.
BEFORE THE 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

WASHINGTON, D. C. 

Motion of 

AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC. DOT-OST-1996-1203 

for confidential treatment under Rule 

12 (Form 41, Schedule B-7) 

MOTION OF AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC. FOR 

CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT UNDER RULE 12 

Communications with respect to this document should be sent to: 

VIRASB VAHIDI 

Senior Vice President -

Marketing and Planning 

and Chief Commercial Officer 

American Airlines, Inc. 

P.O. Box 619616, MD 5628 

DFW Airport, Texas 75261 

November 8, 2012 

WILLIAM K. RIS, JR. 

Senior Vice President -

Government Affairs 

American Airlines, Inc. 

1101 17th Street, N.W. 

Suite 600 

Washington, D.C. 20036 

FRANCIS C. HEIL 

Senior Attorney 

American Airlines, Inc. 

1101 17th Street, N.W. 

Suite 600 

Washington, D.C. 20036 

(202) 496-5642 

francis.heil@aa.com 

JS 
Motion of 

BEFORE THE 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

WASHINGTON, D. C. 

AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC. 

for confidential treatment under Rule 

12 (Form 41, Schedule B-7) 

·DOT-OST-1996-1203 

MOTION OF AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC. FOR 

CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT UNDER RULE 12 

American Airlines, Inc., under 14 CFR 302.12, hereby 

moves that its Form 41, Schedule B-7 for 3Q2012 be accorded 

confidential treatment and withheld from public disclosure. 

The information for which confidential treatment is requested 

pertains to American's airframe and aircraft engine acquisitions and retirements. 

In accordance with the Department's Final Rule on Submitting Airline Data via the Internet, 75 Fed. Reg. 41580, 

41582, July 16, 2010, we are uploading our confidential report 

electronically to http://esubmit.rita.dot.gov 

On June 5, 1995, by letter of James W. Mitchell, Director, Office of Airline Statistics, the Department granted 

confidential treatment for a 10-year period to similar data 

filed by American. For the reasons stated in that letter, the 

current submission should also receive confidential treatment 

for 10 years. 
2 -

WHEREFORE, American moves that the schedule being 

submitted electronically to the above-referenced website be 

withheld from public disclosure under Rule 12 for a period of 

10 years. 

November 8, 2012 

Respectfully submitted, 

Francis C. Heil 

Senior Attorney 

American Airlines, Inc.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

HENRY LEE FORD, III, #170148, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:06cv752-MHT

) (WO)

BRENDA PEN, COI, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

ORDER

There being no objections filed to the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge filed

herein on September 15, 2006 (doc. no. 3), said Recommendation is hereby adopted, and it

is the

ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of the court that this case is DISMISSED

without prejudice for plaintiff's failure to comply with the order of this court.

DONE, this the 13th day of October, 2006.

 /s/ Myron H. Thompson 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00752-MHT-SRW Document 4 Filed 10/13/2006 Page 1 of 1