Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 247 / Monday, December 27, 2010 / Notices 81263 

REVISED TABLE 5.1—TEST LOAD SIZES—Continued 

Container volume Minimum load Maximum load Average load 

cu. ft. 

liter 

lb kg lb kg lb 

< < 

3.60–3.70 101.9–104.8 3.00 1.36 15.00 6.8 9.00 4.08 

3.70–3.80 104.8–107.6 3.00 1.36 15.40 6.99 9.20 4.17 

3.80–3.90 107.6–110.4 3.00 1.36 15.80 7.16 9.40 4.26 

3.90–4.00 110.4–113.3 3.00 1.36 16.20 7.34 9.60 4.35 

4.00–4.10 113.3–116.1 3.00 1.36 16.60 7.53 9.80 4.45 

4.10–4.20 116.1–118.9 3.00 1.36 17.00 7.72 10.00 4.54 

4.20–4.30 118.9–121.8 3.00 1.36 17.40 7.90 10.20 4.63 

4.30–4.40 121.8–124.6 3.00 1.36 17.80 8.09 10.40 4.72 

4.40–4.50 124.6–127.4 3.00 1.36 18.20 8.27 10.60 4.82 

4.50–4.60 127.4–130.3 3.00 1.36 18.70 8.46 10.80 4.91 

4.60–4.70 130.3–133.1 3.00 1.36 19.10 8.65 11.00 5.00 

4.70–4.80 133.1–135.9 3.00 1.36 19.50 8.83 11.20 5.10 

4.80–4.90 135.9–138.8 3.00 1.36 19.90 9.02 11.40 5.19 

4.90–5.00 138.8–141.6 3.00 1.36 20.30 9.20 11.60 5.28 

5.00–5.10 141.6–144.4 3.00 1.36 20.70 9.39 11.90 5.38 

5.10–5.20 144.4–147.2 3.00 1.36 21.10 9.58 12.10 5.47 

5.20–5.30 147.2–150.1 3.00 1.36 21.50 9.76 12.30 5.56 

5.30–5.40 150.1–152.9 3.00 1.36 21.90 9.95 12.50 5.65 

5.40–5.50 152.9–155.7 3.00 1.36 22.30 10.13 12.70 5.75 

5.50–5.60 155.7–158.6 3.00 1.36 22.80 10.32 12.90 5.84 

5.60–5.70 158.6–161.4 3.00 1.36 23.20 10.51 13.10 5.93 

5.70–5.80 161.4–164.2 3.00 1.36 23.60 10.69 13.30 6.03 

5.80–5.90 164.2–167.1 3.00 1.36 24.00 10.88 13.50 6.12 

5.90–6.00 167.1–169.9 3.00 1.36 24.40 11.06 13.70 6.21 

Appendix 2 

Philip Manthei, Senior Staff Engineer, 

Agency and Codes Approval, Alliance 

Laundry Systems LLC, 221 Shepard 

Street, Ripon, WI 54971. 

Michael L. Baroni, General Counsel, 

BSH Home Appliances Corporation, 

5551 McFadden Avenue, Huntington 

Beach, CA 92649. 

John Taylor, Vice President, 

Government Relations and 

Communications, LG Electronics 

U.S.A., Inc., 1776 K Street, NW., 

Washington, DC 20006. 

Bryce Wells, Marketing Manager, Fisher 

& Paykel Appliances, 27 Hubble 

Street, Irvine, CA 92618–4209. 

Earl F. Jones, Senior Counsel— 

Government Relations, GE Consumer 

& Industrial, Appliance Park, AP2– 

225, Louisville, KY 40225. 

Shariff Kan, President, White Goods 

Group, Haier America, 1356 

Broadway, New York, NY 10018. 

[FR Doc. 2010–32436 Filed 12–23–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6450–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 

Federal Energy Regulatory 

Commission 

[Docket No. CP11–45–000] 

Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line 

Company, LLC; Notice of Application 

December 17, 2010. 

Take notice that on December 6, 2010, 

Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line 

Company, LLC (Transco), PO Box 1396, 

Houston, Texas 77251, filed in the 

above referenced docket an application 

pursuant to section 7(b) of the Natural 

Gas Act (NGA) requesting authorization 

to partially abandon storage 

deliverability at the Washington Storage 

Field in St. Landry Parish, Louisiana. 

Transco states that, subsequent to 

Commission approval of the proposed 

abandonment, Transco and its Rate 

Schedule WSS–Open Access customers 

will execute amendments to the 

applicable service agreements to reflect 

the revised Storage Demand Quantities, 

all as more fully set forth in the 

application which is on file with the 

Commission and open to public 

inspection. The filing is available for 

review at the Commission in the Public 

Reference Room or may be viewed on 

the Commission’s Web site web at 

http://www.ferc.gov using the ‘‘eLibrary’’ 

link. Enter the docket number excluding 

the last three digits in the docket 

number field to access the document. 

For assistance, contact FERC at FERC

OnlineSupport@ferc.gov or call toll-free, 

(886) 208–3676 or TTY, (202) 502–8659. 

Any questions concerning this 

application may be directed to Ingrid 

Germany, Staff Regulatory Analyst, 

Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line 

Company, LLC, PO Box 1396, Houston, 

Texas 77251–1396 at (713) 215–4015. 

There are two ways to become 

involved in the Commission’s review of 

this project. First, any person wishing to 

obtain legal status by becoming a party 

to the proceedings for this project 

should, on or before the comment date 

stated below file with the Federal 

Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 

First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, 

a motion to intervene in accordance 

with the requirements of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure (18 CFR 385.214 or 385.211) 

and the Regulations under the NGA (18 

CFR 157.10). A person obtaining party 

status will be placed on the service list 

maintained by the Secretary of the 

Commission and will receive copies of 

all documents filed by the applicant and 

by all other parties. A party must submit 

seven copies of filings made in the 

proceeding with the Commission and 

must mail a copy to the applicant and 

to every other party. Only parties to the 

proceeding can ask for court review of 

Commission orders in the proceeding. 


erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
81264 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 247 / Monday, December 27, 2010 / Notices 

However, a person does not have to 

intervene in order to have comments 

considered. The second way to 

participate is by filing with the 

Secretary of the Commission, as soon as 

possible, an original and two copies of 

comments in support of or in opposition 

to this project. The Commission will 

consider these comments in 

determining the appropriate action to be 

taken, but the filing of a comment alone 

will not serve to make the filer a party 

to the proceeding. The Commission’s 

rules require that persons filing 

comments in opposition to the project 

provide copies of their protests only to 

the party or parties directly involved in 

the protest. 

The Commission strongly encourages 

electronic filings of comments, protests 

and interventions in lieu of paper using 

the ‘‘eFiling’’ link at http://www.ferc.gov. 

Persons unable to file electronically 

should submit an original and seven 

copies of the protest or intervention to 

the Federal Energy Regulatory 

Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 

Washington, DC 20426. 

This filing is accessible on-line at 

http://www.ferc.gov, using the 

‘‘eLibrary’’ link and is available for 

review in the Commission’s Public 

Reference Room in Washington, DC. 

There is an ‘‘eSubscription’’ link on the 

Web site that enables subscribers to 

receive e-mail notification when a 

document is added to a subscribed 

docket(s). For assistance with any FERC 

Online service, please e-mail FERC

OnlineSupport@ferc.gov, or call (866) 

208–3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 

502–8659. 

Comment Date: January 7, 2011. 

Kimberly D. Bose, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2010–32360 Filed 12–23–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6717–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 

Federal Energy Regulatory 

Commission 

[Docket No. EL11–11–000] 

Critical Path Transmission, LLC; Clear 

Power, LLC; v. California Independent 

System Operator, Inc.; Notice of 

Complaint 

December 17, 2010. 

Take notice that on December 14, 

2010, pursuant to Rule 206 of the Rules 

of Practice and Procedure of the Federal 

Energy Regulatory Commission 

(Commission), 18 CFR 385.206 (2010) 

and sections 206 and 306 of the Federal 

Power Act, 16 U.S.C. 824e and 825e 

(2006), Critical Path Transmission, LLC 

and Clear Power LLC (Complainants) 

filed a complaint against California 

Independent System Operator, Inc. 

(CAISO or Respondent), alleging a 

violation of the CAISO tariff, as more 

fully explained in the complaint. 

Complainants state that copies of the 

complaint were served upon 

Respondent. 

Any person desiring to intervene or to 

protest this filing must file in 

accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of 

the Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). 

Protests will be considered by the 

Commission in determining the 

appropriate action to be taken, but will 

not serve to make protestants parties to 

the proceeding. Any person wishing to 

become a party must file a notice of 

intervention or motion to intervene, as 

appropriate. The Respondent’s answer 

and all interventions, or protests must 

be filed on or before the comment date. 

The Respondent’s answer, motions to 

intervene, and protests must be served 

on the Complainants. 

The Commission encourages 

electronic submission of protests and 

interventions in lieu of paper using the 

‘‘eFiling’’ link at http://www.ferc.gov. 

Persons unable to file electronically 

should submit an original and 14 copies 

of the protest or intervention to the 

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 

888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 

20426. 

This filing is accessible on-line at 

http://www.ferc.gov, using the 

‘‘eLibrary’’ link and is available for 

review in the Commission’s Public 

Reference Room in Washington, DC. 

There is an ‘‘eSubscription’’ link on the 

Web site that enables subscribers to 

receive e-mail notification when a 

document is added to a subscribed 

docket(s). For assistance with any FERC 

Online service, please e-mail 

FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov, or call 

(866) 208–3676 (toll free). For TTY, call 

(202) 502–8659. 

Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time 

on January 3, 2011. 

Kimberly D. Bose, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2010–32362 Filed 12–23–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6717–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 

Federal Energy Regulatory 

Commission 

[Project No. 2149–152] 

Public Utility District No. 1 of Douglas 

County; Notice of Intent To Prepare an 

Environmental Impact Statement 

December 16, 2010. 

On May 27, 2010, Public Utility 

District No. 1 of Douglas County filed an 

application for the continued operation 

of the 774.3-megawatt Wells 

Hydroelectric Project No. 2149. Federal 

lands within the project boundary 

include 8.60 acres of U.S. Department of 

Interior and 6.55 acres of U.S. Army 

Corps of Engineers land. 

In accordance with the National 

Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and 

the Commission’s regulations, 

Commission staff held public scoping 

meetings for the relicensing of the Wells 

Project on February 28, 2007, in East 

Wenatchee and Brewster, Washington. 

Based on the comments received in 

response to the Commission’s August 

10, 2010 Notice of Application Accepted 

for Filing, Soliciting Motions to 

Intervene and Protests, Ready for 

Environmental Analysis, and Soliciting 

Comments, Recommendations, 

Preliminary Terms and Conditions, and 

Preliminary Fishway Prescriptions, and 

an errata to this notice issued on August 

19, 2010, Commission staff has 

determined that relicensing of the Wells 

Project may constitute a major federal 

action significantly affecting the quality 

of the human environment. Therefore, 

staff now intends to prepare an 

Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) 

that addresses the relicensing of the 

Wells Project. 

A draft EIS will be issued and 

circulated for review by all interested 

parties. All comments filed on the draft 

EIS will be analyzed by the staff and 

considered in the final EIS. The staff’s 

conclusions and recommendations will 

be available for the Commission’s 

consideration in reaching its final 

licensing decision. 

The application will be processed 

according to the following schedule. 

Revisions to the schedule may be made 

as appropriate. 

Milestone Target date 

Issue Draft EIS ........................................................................................................................................................................ April 6, 2011. 

Comments on Draft EIS due ................................................................................................................................................... May 23, 2011. 


erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES