alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of TurnKey Capital, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017, I, Timothy S. Hart, Interim Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Director of TurnKey Capital, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:



(1)

Such Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of TurnKey Capital, Inc.



|                         |                                                       
|------------------------ | ------------------------------------------------------
|Date:  February 21, 2017 | /s/ Timothy S. Hart                                   
|                         | Timothy S. Hart                                       
|                         | Chief Financial Officer 
(Principle Financial Officer)
#### In the Matter of the Estate of Frank A. Ludlam, Deceased. Nathan Zausmer et al., Individually and as Executors of Frank A. Ludlam, Deceased, Respondents; El Rena L. Schoelles, Appellant.

In a proceeding to determine a claim for legal services rendered to the testator (SCPA 1805, formerly Surrogate’s Ct. Act, § 209 [the claimant is a eoexeeutor of the estate]) insofar as the claim would affect and be paid out of the 25% distributive share of the legatee-appellant, the appeal is from a decree of the Surrogate’s Court, Nassau County, dated July 7, 1967, which allowed the total claim at $25,000 and charged $6,250 thereof to said distributive share, with interest. Decree modified, on the law and on the facts, by limiting the period for computing interest as follows: from September 30, 1953 to January 7, 1955. As so modified, decree affirmed, without costs. In our opinion the Surrogate’s fixation of the attorney’s claim in the sum of $25,000 and charging $6,250 thereof to appellant’s share in the estate is fair and reasonable from the evidence adduced; however, we do not concur in his allowing interest at 6% per annum from the date of the commencement of the proceeding (Sept. 30, 1953) until actual payment. As eoexeeutor and the estate’s attorney, the claimant had the duty to have his claim adjudicated expeditiously in order to avoid the running of interest (cf. *Matter of Kulyk,*243 App. Div. 443; *Matter of Taylor,*95 N. Y. S. 2d 459; 34 C. J. S., Executors and Administrators, § 466) and should not have deferred such determination for his own convenience and pecuniary advantage. The record clearly demonstrates that he should have, and could have, had the hearing to resolve this issue in 1955 when he obtained a decree in a companion proceeding with respect to the portion of his claim that was payable out of the interests of other legatees. Therefore, we allow interest on the sum of $6,250 only from the date of the commencement of the instant proceeding (Sept. 30, 1953) to January 7, 1955, the date the decree was entered in the companion proceeding. Beldoek, P. J., Christ, Rabin, Benjamin and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 248 (Tuesday, December 28, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 81644]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-32439]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

JUDICIAL CONFERENCE OF THE UNITED STATES


Meeting of the Judicial Conference Committee on Rules of Practice 
and Procedure

AGENCY: Judicial Conference of the United States Committee on Rules of 
Practice and Procedure.

ACTION: Notice of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Committee on Rules of Practice and Procedure will hold a 
two-day meeting. The meeting will be open to public observation but not 
participation.

DATES: January 6-7, 2011. Time: 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.

ADDRESSES: James R. Browning, United States Courthouse, Courtroom 5, 95 
Seventh Street, San Francisco, CA.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peter G. McCabe, Secretary Rules 
Committee Support Office, Administrative Office of the United States 
Courts, Washington, DC 20544, telephone (202) 502-1820.

    Dated: December 21, 2010.
Peter G. McCabe,
Rules Committee Support Office.
[FR Doc. 2010-32439 Filed 12-27-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 2210-55-M
###### Editorial Note on Part 2

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

#### § 2.203 Settlement and compromise.

###### Cross Reference

Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 67832, Aug. 22, 2024.

At any time after the issuance of an order designating the time and place of hearing in a proceeding to modify, suspend, or revoke a license or for other action, the staff and a licensee or other person may enter into a stipulation for the settlement of the proceeding or the compromise of a civil penalty. The stipulation or compromise shall be subject to approval by the designated presiding officer or, if none has been designated, by the Chief Administrative Law Judge, according due weight to the position of the staff. The presiding officer, or if none has been designated, the Chief Administrative Law Judge, may order such adjudication of the issues as the presiding officer or Chief Administrative Law Judge may deem to be required in the public interest to dispose of the proceeding. If approved, the terms of the settlement or compromise shall be embodied in a decision or order settling and discontinuing the proceeding.

[36 FR 16896, Aug. 26, 1971, as amended at 88 FR 57876, Aug. 24, 2023]
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 636 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
H. Res. 636

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                     November 30, 2017.
    Resolved, That until otherwise provided by the House, the authority of the 
ranking minority member of the Committee on the Judiciary shall be exercised by 
the minority member of the Committee who, prior to the adoption of this 
resolution, ranked immediately below the ranking minority member.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

NORTHERN DIVISION 

OWEN J. ROGAL, D.D.S., P.C., 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

SKILSTAF, INC., 

 Defendant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CIVIL ACTION NO. 

3:06-cv-00711-MHT 

DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO REPLY 

TO PLAINTIFF’S BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT 

SKILSTAF, INC.’S MOTION TO STRIKE JURY DEMAND

In order to fully address the matters now before the Court, Defendant 

Skilstaf, Inc. (“Skilstaf”) respectfully moves the Court to permit Skilstaf to file a 

reply on or before August 22, 2007, to Plaintiff’s Brief in Opposition to Defendant 

Skilstaf, Inc.’s Motion to Strike Jury Demand (Doc. No. 69). As grounds for this 

motion, Skilstaf states as follows: 

1. On August 17, 2007, the Court entered an order, indicating that 

Defendant’s Motion to Strike Jury Demand had been set for submission without 

oral argument on August 22, 2007, with all briefs due by that date. (Doc. 68). 

2. Plaintiff filed its Opposition on August 17, 2007. (Doc. 69). 

Case 3:06-cv-00711-MHT-WC Document 70 Filed 08/20/2007 Page 1 of 3
2

3. Skilstaf is gathering information and would like to reply to the 

some of the legal arguments asserted in Plaintiff’s Opposition. Skilstaf’s counsel 

believes that it can gather the necessary information and draft its reply by 

Wednesday, August 22, 2007. 

WHEREFORE, Skilstaf respectfully moves the Court to enter an 

order permitting Skilstaf to file a reply on or before August 22, 2007, to Plaintiff’s 

Brief in Opposition to Defendant Skilstaf, Inc.’s Motion to Strike Jury Demand 

(Doc. No. 69). 

Respectfully Submitted, 

 s/Charles A. Stewart III 

Charles A. Stewart III (STE067) 

Bradley Arant Rose & White LLP

The Alabama Center for Commerce 

401 Adams Avenue, Suite 780 

Montgomery, AL 36104 

Telephone: (334) 956-7700 

Facsimile: (334) 956-7701 

cstewart@bradleyarant.com

s/Amelia T. Driscoll 

Amelia T. Driscoll (DRI016) 

Bradley Arant Rose & White LLP

1819 Fifth Avenue North 

Birmingham, AL 35203-2104 

Telephone: (205) 521-8000 

Facsimile: (205) 521-8800 

adriscoll@bradleyarant.com

Attorneys for Defendant 

Skilstaf, Inc. 

Case 3:06-cv-00711-MHT-WC Document 70 Filed 08/20/2007 Page 2 of 3
3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on August 20, 2007, I electronically filed the foregoing 

with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system, which will send notification 

of such filing to the following: 

Robert E. Cole 

437 Chestnut Street, Suite 218 

Philadelphia, PA 19106 

Beth A. Friel 

Jeanne L. Bakker 

Mongtomery, McCracken, Walker & Rhoads 

123 South Broad Street 

Philadelphia, PA 19109 

and I hereby certify that I have mailed by U. S. Postal Service the document to the 

following non-CM/ECF participants: None. 

/s/ Amelia T. Driscoll 

Case 3:06-cv-00711-MHT-WC Document 70 Filed 08/20/2007 Page 3 of 3
223 So.2d 410

#### Billy Roy MORACE v. Josephine Louise MORACE.

No. 49864.

June 13, 1969.

In re: Billy Roy Morace applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of East Baton Rouge. 220 So.2d 775.

Writ refused. The result is correct.

BARHAM, J.,

is of the opinion the application should be granted. The appellate court has “corseted” the child support obligation with property law principles.
Case 2:06-cr-00193-MEF-CSC Document 37 Filed 11/15/2006 Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 709 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 709

   Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to ensure that 
Members have a reasonable amount of time to read legislation that will 
                             be voted upon.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 2, 2006

Mr. Paul submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                           Committee on Rules

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to ensure that 
Members have a reasonable amount of time to read legislation that will 
                             be voted upon.

    Resolved, That:
    (a) The Rules of the House of Representatives are amended by adding 
at the end the following new rule:

                              ``rule xxix

                ``time to read legislation before voting

    ``1. Notwithstanding any provision of these rules, no bill, joint 
resolution, conference report, or amendment between the Houses shall be 
voted on by the House unless the text of that measure has been 
available to all Members and their staffs in both printed and 
electronic format for at least 10 days and any manager's amendment or 
other amendment which makes substantive changes to the legislation has 
been made available in both printed and electronic versions for at 
least 72 hours before the scheduled vote on such legislation.
    ``2. Clause 1 shall not apply to--
            ``(1) the intelligence authorization bill, appropriations, 
        or other legislation containing classified information, or 
        conference report thereon, if Members have at least 7 days to 
        study the contents of such measure; and
            ``(2) congressional declarations of war or authorization of 
        military force to respond to attacks on the United States.
    ``3. (a) Any Member who votes for any measure that has been placed 
before the House in violation of this rule shall be deemed to have 
violated House ethics rules and be subject to censure.
    ``(b) Notwithstanding any provision of these rules, any citizen who 
is eligible to vote and who is not an employee of the executive or 
judicial branch of the Government may petition the Committee on 
Standards and Official Conduct to investigate allegations that a Member 
voted for any measure that violated this rule.''.
    (b) Clause 6(c) of rule XIII of the Rules of the House of 
Representatives is amended by striking the period at the end of 
subparagraph (2) and inserting ``; or'' and by adding at the end the 
following new subparagraph:
            ``(3) a rule or order that would waive the provisions of 
        rule XXIX.''.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 519 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 519

 Recognizing and saluting the Carolinas Independent Automobile Dealers 
                              Association.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 27, 2005

Mr. Wilson of South Carolina submitted the following resolution; which 
          was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Recognizing and saluting the Carolinas Independent Automobile Dealers 
                              Association.

Whereas the Carolinas Independent Automobile Dealers Association was founded in 
        1955 by a small group of businesspeople with a shared interest in 
        supporting and uniting independent automobile dealers throughout North 
        and South Carolina;
Whereas the Carolinas Independent Automobile Dealers Association has 
        approximately 2,500 members and is the largest association within the 
        National Independent Automobile Dealers Association in the Nation;
Whereas the Carolinas Independent Automobile Dealers Association encourages its 
        members to abide by a published code of ethics, and to actively serve 
        the best interests of the people of North and South Carolina;
Whereas the National Independent Automobile Dealers Association has elected 4 
        distinguished presidents from the membership of the Carolinas 
        Independent Automobile Dealers Association;
Whereas the current president of the National Independent Automobile Dealers 
        Association, the first female president of the association, is a member 
        of the Carolinas Independent Automobile Dealers Association; and
Whereas the Carolinas Independent Automobile Dealers Association, headquartered 
        in Harrisburg, North Carolina, is committed to community service on 
        behalf of the people of Cabarrus County, and all of North and South 
        Carolina: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) recognizes the Carolinas Independent Automobile Dealers 
        Association on the 50th anniversary of the association; and
            (2) salutes the Carolinas Independent Automobile Dealers 
        Association for providing outstanding service to the people of 
        North and South Carolina.
                                 <all>
```
# L_2007248EN.01002702.xml

| 22.9.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 248/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.9.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 248/27

---

Corrigendum to Regulation (ECSC, EEC, Euratom) No 558/73 of the Council of 26 February 1973 amending Regulation (EEC, Euratom, ECSC) No 259/68 fixing the Staff Regulations of the Officials and Conditions of employment applicable to other Servants of the European Communities

(
  Official Journal of the European Communities L 55 of 28 February 1973
  )

On page 2, Article 1(1)(k) first indent (concerning Article 10 of Annex VII):

for:

‘— In the first subparagraph of paragraph 1 and in paragraph 2 (a) and (b) the words: “entitled to the household allowance”, “not entitled to the household allowance”, “who is entitled to the household allowance”, and “who is not entitled to the household allowance” shall be substituted for “head of household”, “not head of household”, “who is not head of household” and “who is head of household”.’,

read:

‘— In the first subparagraph of paragraph 1 and in paragraph 2 (a) and (b) the words: “entitled to the household allowance”, “not entitled to the household allowance”, “who is not entitled to the household allowance”, and “who is entitled to the household allowance” shall be substituted for “head of household”, “not head of household”, “who is not head of household” and “who is head of household”.’

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-26-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-24-1996
<CASH>                                          31,885
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   49,169
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    358,550
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               465,587
<PP&E>                                         675,743
<DEPRECIATION>                                 277,606
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 875,128
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          307,390
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         9,767
<OTHER-SE>                                     518,189
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   875,128
<SALES>                                      2,013,820
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                        1,474,812
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,952,386
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 61,434
<INCOME-TAX>                                    24,500
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             36,934
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    36,934
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.87
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
### RE: Felman inspection report Amy M. Lincoln to: Beth Friedman Cc: Conrad Chin, r.powell, jskonrady This message has been replied to and forwarded. 2 attachments 

# -,:i

**~** Felman insp rept mar_12 REDACTED.pdfFelman insp rept mar_12 CONTAINS CBI.pdf 05/23/2012 12:57 PM

As requested, here is afinal (clean) version ofthe document with the CBI redacted. Also attached is a clean copy ofthe confidential version for your files. This one is labeled as containing CBI and also corrects the "Inc." in the Subject line on page 

### 1, which 

### I missed in yesterday's CBI version. Amy M. Lincoln Principal Beverlctge 

### & -Diamo - nd, P.C. 456 Montgomery Street Suite 1800 San Francisco, CA 94104 T (415) 262-4029 - F (415) 262-4040 Alincoln@bdlaw
.com 

# BEVERIDGE~



# &DIAMOND~ CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: This electronic message contains information from the law firm of Beveridge & Diamond, P.C. and may be confidential or privileged . The information is intended solely for the use of the individual(s) or entity(ies) named above. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution , or use of the contents of this message is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately by telephone at (202) 789-6000 or by e-mail reply and delete this message. Thank you . IRS CIRCULAR 230 DISCLOSURE: To the extent that tax advice is contained in this correspondence or any attachment hereto, you are advised that such tax advice is not intended to be used, and cannot be used for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code, or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party the tax advice contained herein . Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.
From: Beth Friedman [mailto:friedman.beth@ecrweb.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2012 6:17AM To: Amy M. Lincoln Cc: Chin.Conrad@epamail.epa.gov Subject: FW: Felman inspection reportAmyCould you please send us a final nonconfidential version that has the CBI redacted? I will enter the confidential version into the CBI files. Beth From: Conrad Chin [mailto:Chin
.Conrad@epamail.epa.gov]
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of AccuPoll Holding Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Craig A. Hewitt, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


February 14, 2005                           /s/ Craig A. Hewitt
                                            -----------------------------------
                                            Craig A. Hewitt
                                            Chief Financial Officer

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.