alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| (logo)  **ncb**  National Cooperative Bank    | 2011  Crystal Drive  Suite, 8oo  Arlington, VA 22202 |
|----------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

February6, 2019

 

WellsFargo Commercial Mortgage Securities, Inc. as Depositor

Attn:Anthony Sfarra

375Park Avenue, 2nd Floor

J0127-023

NewYork, NY 10152

 

RE:        Annual Statement as to Compliance

              WFRBS 2013 C12

 

DearSir/Madam:

 

 

Inaccordance with the Pooling and Servicing Agreement entered into in connectionwith the issuance of the Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series2013-C12, as an authorized officer of National Cooperative Bank, N.A. (the“Co-op Special Servicer”), I hereby certify that:

 

a.       Areview of the activities of the Co-op Special Servicer during the precedingcalendar year (the “Reporting Period”) and of its performance under the Poolingand Servicing Agreement has been made under my supervision.

 

b.       Tothe best of my knowledge, based on these reviews, the Co-op Special Servicerhas fulfilled all obligations under this agreement in all material respectsthroughout the Reporting Period.

 

Pleasenote that the annual financial statement will be sent under separate cover onor before March 31, 2019.

 

 

Bestregards,

/s/Karyn Mann

KarynMann

SeniorVice President, Investor Compliance

NationalCooperative Bank, N.A.
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications.

 

 

I, Nicholas Galeone, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filedin respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of the UBS-Barclays Commercial Mortgage Trust 2013-C5 (the "ExchangeAct periodic reports");

 

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information requiredto be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report underItem 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligationsunder the servicing agreements in all material respects; and

 

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backedsecurities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities requiredto be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been includedas an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in suchreports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to meby the following unaffiliated parties:

 

Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, MidlandLoan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, as Special Servicer, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Trustee, DeutscheBank Trust Company Americas, as Certificate Administrator, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Custodian, Situs Holdings, LLC, asOperating Advisor, and KeyBank National Association (as successor to KeyCorp Real Estate Capital Markets, Inc.), as Primary Servicer.

 

 

 

Dated: March 16, 2023 

 

/s/ Nicholas Galeone

 

Nicholas Galeone

President

(senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
EXHIBIT 31.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Diana Dimadi, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of AccuPoll Holding
Corp.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions);

(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.


May 20, 2005                                   /s/  Diana Dimadi
                                                --------------------------------
                                                    Diana Dimadi
                                                    Chief Financial Officer
###### Editorial Note on Part 72

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 72 appear at 80 FR 74981, Dec. 1, 2015, and at 81 FR 86910, Dec. 2, 2016.

#### § 72.246 Issuance of amendment to a certificate of compliance.

In determining whether an amendment to a CoC will be issued to the applicant, the Commission will be guided by the considerations that govern the issuance of an initial CoC.

[64 FR 53617, Oct. 4, 1999]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-29-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-31-1997
<CASH>                                          16,228
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   53,898
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    345,447
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               434,753
<PP&E>                                         724,226
<DEPRECIATION>                                 302,231
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 867,572
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          278,603
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        19,412
<OTHER-SE>                                     537,126
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   867,572
<SALES>                                      1,429,200
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                        1,050,355
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,385,856
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 43,344
<INCOME-TAX>                                    17,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             26,344
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    26,344
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .67
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .67
        

</TABLE>
PGI 222.101-4 Removal of items from contractors' facilities affected by work stoppages.       (a)(ii) Include the following information in the request:          (*1*) Contract number.          (*2*) A statement as to the urgency and criticality of the item needed.          (*3*) A description of the items to be moved (nature of the item, amount, approximate weight and cubic feet, item number, etc.).          (*4*) Mode of transportation by which the items are to be moved, if different than in the contract, and whether by Government or commercial bill of lading.          (*5*) Destination of the material, if different from that specified in the contract.    **Parent topic:** PGI 222.101 Labor relations.
Webinar Attendees: The Commercial/Industrial Pumps Working Group Meeting Meeting Date: Thursday, January 30, 2014 Name Title Organization Street City State Zip Phone Fax Email Johnson, Erica N/A Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) 902 Battelle Blvd Richland WA 99354 N/A N/A Menzer, Mark Director of Public

Meeting Affairs Danfoss 11655 Crossroads Circle Baltimore MD 21220-2863410-931-6779 N/A Rivest, Michael C.Managing Director Navigant Consulting, Inc. 1200 19th Street, NW, Suite 700 WashingtonDC 20036 202-973-2426202-973-2401 Sdano, Arnold R. Chief Engineer Pentair Engineered Flow 3601 Fairbanks Avenue Kansas CityKS 66106 913-748-4152 913-748-4039 Vuppuluri, Prem N/A N/A 2455 George Washington Way Richland WA 99354 N/A N/A
#### Tonasia Maxwell et al., Respondents, v City of New York et al., Appellants.

[815 NYS2d 133]

In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice, etc., the defendants appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (LeVine, J.), dated July 21, 2004, as denied that branch of their motion which was pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7) to dismiss the complaint on the ground that the plaintiffs failed to serve a timely notice of claim.

*541Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, that branch of the defendants’ motion which was to dismiss the complaint for failure to serve a timely notice of claim is granted, and the complaint is dismissed.

Service of a notice of claim within 90 days after accrual of the claim is a condition precedent to commencing an action against the defendants herein *(see*General Municipal Law § 50-e [1] [a]; § 50-i [1] [a]; McKinney’s Uncons Laws of NY § 7401 [2]; *Scantlebury v New York City Health & Hosps. Corp.,*4 NY3d 606, 609-610 [2005]; *Perry v City of New York,*238 AD2d 326 [1997]; *see also Small v New York City Tr. Auth.,*14 AD3d 690 [2005]). The plaintiffs failed to serve their notice of claim within the statutory period, and their late service without leave of court was a nullity *(see Santiago v City of New York,*294 AD2d 483 [2002]; *Henry v Aguilar,*282 AD2d 711 [2001]; *Kokkinos v Dormitory Auth. of State of N.Y.,*238 AD2d 550, 551 [1997]).

The plaintiffs were required to move within one year and 90 days of the accrual date of the claim for leave to serve a late notice of claim pursuant to General Municipal Law § 50-e (5) *(see Small v New York City Tr. Auth., supra; Santiago v City of New York, supra).*Since the plaintiffs failed to make a timely application for such relief, the defendants were entitled to dismissal of the complaint *(see Pierson v City of New York,*56 NY2d 950 [1982]; *Herrera v Duncan,*13 AD3d 485 [2004]).

The plaintiffs’ argument that the defendants should be estopped from asserting as a defense their failure to serve a timely notice of claim is without merit. The defendants were under no obligation to plead, as an affirmative defense, the plaintiffs’ failure to comply with the statutory requirement *(see Lynch v New York City Tr. Auth.,*12 AD3d 644, 646 [2004]; *Ames v City of New York,*280 AD2d 625, 626 [2001]; *Ceely v New York City Health & Hosps. Corp.,*162 AD2d 492, 493 [1990]), and the defendants did not engage in any conduct that would give rise to an estoppel *(see Wade v New York City Health & Hosps. Corp.,*16 AD3d 677 [2005]; *Cappadonna v New York City Tr. Auth.,*187 AD2d 691, 692 [1992]; *Nicholas v City of New York,*130 AD2d 470 [1987]).

In light of this determination, we need not address the defendants’ remaining contentions. Crane, J.P., Mastro, Rivera and Spolzino, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 696 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 696

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that there should 
  be established a National Physical Education and Sports Week and a 
             National Physical Education and Sports Month.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 16, 2006

    Mr. Udall of Colorado (for himself and Mr. Wamp) submitted the 
following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Government 
                                 Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that there should 
  be established a National Physical Education and Sports Week and a 
             National Physical Education and Sports Month.

Whereas many residents of the United States would improve the quality of their 
        lives through proper exercise and diet;
Whereas obesity-related diseases cost the United States economy more than 
        $100,000,000,000 every year;
Whereas physical activity reduces risk, at all ages, of heart disease, high 
        blood pressure, and diabetes;
Whereas almost half of individuals aged 12 through 21, and more than a third of 
        high school students, do not participate in vigorous physical activity 
        on a regular basis;
Whereas physical activity is necessary to support normal growth in children and 
        is essential to the continuing health and well-being of youth and 
        adults;
Whereas the 60 million school-aged children and youth in the United States have 
        the potential to acquire the knowledge, skills, and values that can lead 
        to a lifetime of physically active and heathy living;
Whereas in a 1996 report on physical activity and health, the Surgeon General of 
        the United States Public Health Service verified that regular physical 
        activity is associated with improved health-related quality of life;
Whereas it would be appropriate to recognize May 1 through 7, 2006, as National 
        Physical Education and Sports Week; and
Whereas the month of May has traditionally been recognized as National Physical 
        Education and Sports Month to encourage broader promotion of physical 
        fitness activities and programs in schools, parks, recreation 
        departments, employee associations, hospitals, and other entities 
        involved in physical fitness: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives that 
there should be established--
            (1) a National Physical Education and Sports Week; and
            (2) a National Physical Education and Sports Month.
                                 <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                             934,925
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,169,764
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (167,000)
<INVENTORY>                                      1,213,439
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 4,367,443
<PP&E>                                             821,268
<DEPRECIATION>                                    (478,492)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   6,284,103
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,539,964
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                           632,597
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,349,373
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     6,284,103
<SALES>                                          1,952,816
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,952,816
<CGS>                                              849,475
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,009,280
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 (98,660)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      4,712
<INCOME-TAX>                                        19,514
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      0
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (14,802)
<EPS-BASIC>                                           0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0



</TABLE>
BOARD RESOLUTION

REQUESTING HARDSHIP RATE LOAN

	WHEREAS, it has been determined on the basis of the current Construction Work Plan that financing is needed for electric facilities as shown on Rural Utilities Service (RUS) Form 740c, Cost Estimates and Loan Budget for Electric Borrowers, as follows:

	RUS Hardship Rate Loan Requested:

$		 for Facilities

	NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that (Insert name and address of Applicant) make application to the RUS for a hardship rate loan in the approximate amount of   $		 to be used in accordance with the provisions of 7 CFR Part 1710 and 7 CFR Part 1714 to finance the above mentioned facilities.

	BE IT ALSO RESOLVED, that the RUS loan shall cover a period of (Insert number of years) years and shall provide for repayment of the loan (choose one of the following) (a) in periodic installments which provide for interest and level amortization of principal over the term of the loan (level principal method). or (b) in periodic installments, including interest and principal payments, which are equal in amount to every other such periodic installment (level payment method).

	BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that RUS note shall be in the full amount of the RUS loan and provide for the repayment of principal to begin two years from the date thereof.

CERTIFICATION OF SECRETARY

I, 			, Secretary of 				 do hereby certify that the above is a true and correct excerpt from the minutes of the meeting of the board of directors of the 					, held on the 		 day of 		, 19     , at which meeting a quorum was present.

	SEAL		

		Signature
#### BROSKY v. HALLOCK.

(No. 6576.)

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

December 31, 1914.)

Venue (§ 46*)—Change of Place of Teial—Grounds.

Where, in an employé’s action brought in N. county for injuries sustained in G. county, where defendant resided, the papers moving to change the place of trial to G. county for the convenience of witnesses showed that there were at least 11 necessary witnesses, all residents of that county, and no affidavits were presented in opposition thereto, it was error to deny the motion.

[Ed. Note.—For other cases, see Venue, Cent. Dig. § 68; Dec. Dig. § 46.*]

Appeal from Special Term, New York County.

Action <by John Brosky against Charles D. Hallock. From an order denying a motion to change the place of trial for the convenience of witnesses, defendant appeals. Reversed.

Argued before CLARKE, McLAUGHLIN, LAUGHLIN, SCOTT, and HOTCHKISS, JJ.

John L. Fray, of Catskill, for appellant.

Edward F. Lindsay, of New York City, for respondent.

*

For other cases see same topic & § number in Dec. *&*Am. Digs. 1907 to date, & Rep’r Indexes

McLAUGHLIN, J.

The defendant, a resident of Greene county, employed the plaintiff to work in a sawmill there located, and while thus engaged he sustained personal injuries. He brought this action, the venue being laid in the county of New York, to recover the dam*756ages alleged to have been sustained, on the ground that the same were caused by defendant’s negligence. After issue was joined, defendant moved to change the place of trial to Greene county for the convenience of witnesses.

The moving papers showed there were at least 11 necessary and material witnesses, all residents of that county. Notwithstanding no affidavits were presented on behalf of the plaintiff in opposition, the motion was denied. I think the motion should have been granted. The cause of action arose in Greene county. All of the witnesses, unless it be the plaintiff himself, reside in that county. Such facts brought the case within the general rule, which is that transitory actions should ' be tried in the county where the transaction involved in the controversy took place. Kaufman v. Kaufman, 152 App. Div. 100, 136 N. Y. Supp. 592; Van Alstine v. Burt, 151 App. Div. 81, 135 N. Y. Supp. 779; Fluckiger v. Haber, 144 App. Div. 65, 128 N. Y. Supp. 739.

The order appealed from, therefore, is reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, with $10 costs. All concur.
#### Monroe County Water Authority, Respondent, v. City of Rochester, Appellant.

Order unanimously affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: We hold that the order is appealable, and affirm on the merits. declaration of rights has been made. Respondent has not shown that the public interest cannot be served as it deems best within the framework of the contract. (Appeal from order of Monroe Special Term granting motion to dismiss second defense and counterclaim.) Present—Goldman, P. J., Marsh, Witmer, Bastow and Henry, JJ.