alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

----

| CONSENT                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      |
| The Board of DirectorsMazor Robotics Ltd.:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                |
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      |
| We hereby consent to the references to our firm as an independent valuation specialist, and to the assistance we provided with respect to the valuation of warrants issued to investors on September 27, 2012, included under the heading “Warrants” of “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects – A. Operating Results” of this Annual Report on Form 20-F of Mazor Robotics Ltd. /s/ Financial Immunities Dealing Room Ltd.Financial Immunities Dealing Room Ltd.  |

----

----
IV 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 53 

Congratulating Ichiro Suzuki for breaking the Major League Baseball record 

for hits in a single season. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 26, 2005 

Mr. MCDERMOTT (for himself, Mr. INSLEE, Mr. LARSEN of Washington, Mr. 

DICKS, Mr. SMITH of Washington, Miss McMorris, Mr. HASTINGS of 

Washington, and Mr. BAIRD) submitted the following resolution; which 

was referred to the Committee on Government Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Congratulating Ichiro Suzuki for breaking the Major League 

Baseball record for hits in a single season. 

Whereas on Friday, October 1, 2004, right fielder Ichiro Suzuki of the Seattle Mariners got his 258th hit of the 

2004 season, thereby breaking the Major League Baseball record for hits in a single season; 

Whereas Ichiro Suzuki’s 262 hits in a single season breaks 

the 84-year old record of 257, set by George Sisler in 

1920; 

Whereas Ichiro Suzuki’s 225 singles in a single season breaks 

the 106-year old record of 206, set by ‘‘Wee’’ Willie 

Keeler in 1898; 
2 

•HRES 53 IH 

Whereas in 2004 Ichiro Suzuki won his second American 

League batting title in four years; 

Whereas Ichiro Suzuki’s batting average of .372 during the 

2004 season was the highest single-season batting average ever for a Seattle Mariner; and 

Whereas no other player in the history of Major League 

Baseball has as many hits in the first four years of his 

career as Ichiro Suzuki: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) congratulates Ichiro Suzuki for breaking the 

3 Major League Baseball record for hits in a single 

4 season and recognizes his historic achievements; 

5 (2) requests that the President recognize the 

6 accomplishments of Ichiro Suzuki; and 

7 (3) directs the Clerk of the House of Represent8 atives to make available enrolled copies of this reso9 lution to Ichiro Suzuki for appropriate display and 

10 to transmit an enrolled copy of this resolution to the 

11 owner of the Seattle Mariners, the Commissioner of 

12 Baseball, and the President of the National Baseball 

13 Hall of Fame and Museum. 

Æ
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

Russell E. Garner *

*

Plaintiff, *

*

vs. * Civil Case No. 01:06cv781-MHT

*

Progressive Direct Insurance Company, *

*

Defendant. *

REPORT OF PARTIES PLANNING MEETING

I. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f), a scheduling meeting was held on September

26, 2006, and was attended by:

David W. Rousseau for Plaintiff

Alex Holtsford for Defendant

II. Pre-Discovery Disclosures

The parties will exchange initial disclosures required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1)

within twenty-one days after the scheduling order has been entered.

III. Discovery Plan

The parties jointly propose to the Court the following discovery plan:

a. All discovery commenced in time to be completed by March 12, 2007.

b. Maximum of 40 interrogatories by each party to the other party; responses are

due 30 days after service.

c. Maximum of 30 requests for admissions by each party to the other party;

responses due 30 days after service;

d. Maximum of 10 depositions by Plaintiff and 10 depositions by Defendants.

e. Each deposition will not exceed four hours unless agreed to by the parties.

Case 1:06-cv-00781-MHT-TFM Document 6 Filed 09/26/2006 Page 1 of 3
f. Reports from retained experts under Rule 26(a)(2) due:

From Plaintiffs : December 1, 2006

From Defendants : January 1, 2007

IV. Other Items

a. Parties do not request a conference with the Court before entry of the scheduling

order;

b. The parties request a pretrial conference in April 2007.

c. Plaintiffs will be allowed until December 1, 2006, to join additional parties and

until December 1, 2006, to amend pleadings.

d. Defendants shall be allowed until January 1, 2007, to join additional parties and

until January 1, 2007, to amend pleadings.

e. All potentially dispositive motions should be filed by March 12, 2007.

f. Final list of witness and exhibits under Rule 26(a)(3) should be due:

Plaintiff’s exhibit list - March 12, 2007

Plaintiff’s witness list - March 12, 2007

Defendant’s exhibit list - March 12, 2007

Defendant’s witness list - March 12, 2007

g. Parties should have ten days after service of final list of witnesses and exhibits to

list an objection under Rule 26(a)(3).

h. The case should be ready for trial by May 7, 2007, and is expected to take

approximately 2 days.

Dated: September 26, 2006 _________________

/s Alex L. Holtsford, Jr 

Alex L. Holtsford, Jr. (HOL048)

Attorney for Defendant

OF COUNSEL:

Nix Holtsford Gilliland

Higgins & Hitson, P.C.

Post Office Box 4128

Case 1:06-cv-00781-MHT-TFM Document 6 Filed 09/26/2006 Page 2 of 3
Montgomery, Alabama 36104

334-215-8585

s/David W. Rousseau 

David W. Rousseau

Attorney for Plaintiff

OF COUNSEL:

David W. Rousseau

Attorney For Plaintiff

211 W. Adams Street

Dothan, Alabama 36303

Case 1:06-cv-00781-MHT-TFM Document 6 Filed 09/26/2006 Page 3 of 3
§ 590.302 Motions and answers. ( a ) Motions for any procedural or interlocutory ruling shall set forth the ruling or relief requested and state the grounds and the statutory or other authority relied upon. All written motions shall comply with the filing requirements of § 590.103. Motions made during conferences, oral presentations or trial-type hearings may be stated orally upon the record, unless the Assistant Secretary or the presiding official determines otherwise.
( b ) Any party may file an answer to any written motion within fifteen (15) days after the motion is filed, unless another period of time is established by the Assistant Secretary or the presiding official. Answers shall be in writing and shall detail each material allegation of the motion being answered. Answers shall state clearly and concisely the facts and legal authorities relied upon.
( c ) Any motion, except for motions seeking intervention or requesting that a conference, oral presentation or trial-type hearing be held, shall be deemed to have been denied, unless the Assistant Secretary or presiding official acts within thirty (30) days after the motion is filed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5





<MULTIPLIER>                                    1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1996
<CASH>                                          30,101
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   49,890
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,127
<INVENTORY>                                     23,336
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               121,513
<PP&E>                                          15,547
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,443
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 205,683
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           99,217
<BONDS>                                         37,450
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           475
<OTHER-SE>                                      67,260
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   205,683
<SALES>                                        196,777
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               199,349
<CGS>                                          129,520
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  216,550
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   216
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,387
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (19,588)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    (6,056)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (13,532)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (13,532)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.29)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.29)
        


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 521 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 521

 Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the Former 
Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (FYROM) should cease its distribution of 
  negative and nationalist propaganda and should work with the United 
Nations and Greece to find a mutually acceptable official name for the 
                                 FYROM.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 27, 2005

 Mrs. Maloney (for herself and Mr. Bilirakis) submitted the following 
   resolution; which was referred to the Committee on International 
                               Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the Former 
Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (FYROM) should cease its distribution of 
  negative and nationalist propaganda and should work with the United 
Nations and Greece to find a mutually acceptable official name for the 
                                 FYROM.

Whereas on April 8, 1993, the United Nations General Assembly admitted as a 
        member the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (FYROM), not as the 
        ``Republic of Macedonia'', but as the ``Former Yugoslav Republic of 
        Macedonia'';
Whereas United Nations Security Council Resolution 817 (1993) states that the 
        dispute over the name must be resolved to maintain peaceful relations 
        between Greece and the FYROM;
Whereas on September 13, 1995, Greece and the FYROM signed a United Nations 
        brokered Interim Accord;
Whereas since its admittance to the United Nations in 1993, the FYROM has 
        allowed the publishing of negative and nationalist propaganda, including 
        in school textbooks;
Whereas students are being taught that parts of Greece, including Greek 
        Macedonia, belong to the FYROM;
Whereas some textbooks and maps show that a ``Greater Macedonia'' extends south 
        to Mount Olympus in Greece and east to Mount Pirin in Bulgaria; and
Whereas this misinformation instills hostility in portions of the population of 
        the FYROM toward Greece: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) urges the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (FYROM) 
        to observe its obligations under Article 7 of the 1995 United 
        Nations brokered Interim Accord and take steps to halt the 
        proliferation of negative propaganda toward Greece and review 
        the contents of textbooks, maps, and teaching aids to ensure 
        that such tools are stating accurate information; and
            (2) urges the FYROM to work within the framework of the 
        United Nations process to reach a mutually acceptable permanent 
        name.
                                 <all>
```
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department


## 186 **CA 11-00985** PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., FAHEY, PERADOTTO, CARNI, AND LINDLEY, JJ.

MICHAEL REW, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

V ORDER
VALEO, INC. AND VALEO ENGINE COOLING, INC., DEFENDANTS.

---------------------------------------------- VALEO, INC., THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

V
DIVERSIFIED ERECTION SERVICES, INC., THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

KENNEY SHELTON LIPTAK NOWAK LLP, BUFFALO (WENDY A. SCOTT OF COUNSEL), FOR THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
PHILLIPS LYTLE LLP, BUFFALO (WILLIAM D. CHRIST OF COUNSEL), FOR THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.
BROWN CHIARI LLP, LANCASTER (SAMUEL J. CAPIZZI OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.

Appeal from an amended order of the Supreme Court, Niagara County (Ralph A. Boniello, III, J.), entered December 22, 2010 in a personal injury action. The amended order, among other things, denied in part third-party defendant’s motion for summary judgment. It is hereby ORDERED that the amended order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Entered: February 17, 2012 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 190 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 190

 Recognizing the 50th anniversary of Lake of the Woods Association of 
                        Orange County, Virginia.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 10, 2017

Mr. Brat submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Recognizing the 50th anniversary of Lake of the Woods Association of 
                        Orange County, Virginia.

Whereas Lake of the Woods Association is a large property owners association 
        located in Orange County, Virginia, that was developed 50 years ago;
Whereas Lake of the Woods Association currently has over 38,000 homes and 8,000 
        full-time residents;
Whereas Lake of the Woods Association members have dedicated the Association to 
        the preservation of the natural environment of the area by making 
        significant commitment to maintaining and improving the area's lakes, 
        foliage, and green space;
Whereas Lake of the Woods Association members have dedicated the Association to 
        the preservation of historic resources, have conducted extensive 
        research, and have marked the location of events of the Battle of the 
        Wilderness, which took place in the area on 5-7 May 1864;
Whereas Lake of the Woods has been named the 2015 Community Association of the 
        Year for a Large Association by the Community Association Institute of 
        Virginia; and
Whereas the Articles of Incorporation of Lake of the Woods Association were 
        approved by the Commonwealth of Virginia on April 21, 1967: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) recognizes Lake of the Woods Association upon the 
        occasion of its 50th anniversary; and
            (2) congratulates Lake of the Woods Association for 50 
        years of commitment and concern that its members have shown for 
        their community and the environment.
                                 <all>
```
September 10, 2015

Mr. Andre B. Gervais

11149 Sacco Drive

Boca Raton, FL 33482

Dear Mr. Gervais :

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your petition for an exemption from

§ § 45.23(a) and (b); 45.27(a); 45.29; 47.15; 91.7(a); 91.119(b) and (c); 91.121, 91.151(a);

91.405(a); 91.407(a)(1); 91.409(a)(2); and 91.417(a) and (b) of Title 14, Code of Federal

Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we cannot pro cess your request and what you should

do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can n o t Process Your Request

We received your exemption request filed in D ocket No

. FAA− 20 15

− 2651 , but we are unable

to process your request any further. Your petition does no t comply with the requirements of

§ 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of

the following:

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would

benefit the public as a whole.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

For more detailed information relating to submitting petitions for exemption, please visit

http://aes.faa.gov/petition/index.html . This website helps the petitioner to meet Federal

Aviation A dministration (FAA) requirement outlines in § 11.81 and helps answer any

questions you may have.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must submit the requested information

within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption

at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notif ying you further.

If you have any questions you may call the 333 Information Line (202) 267

- 2999.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and

Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure s34
2022.901-70 Contract provisions.

The contracting officer shall insert the provision found at 2052.222-70, Nondiscrimination Because

of Age, in all solicitations.

Parent topic: Subpart 2022.9 - Nondiscrimination Because of Age
###### Editorial Note on Part 100

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 100 appear at 81 FR 86910, Dec. 2, 2016.

#### § 100.4 Communications.

Except where otherwise specified, all communications and reports concerning the regulations in this part and applications filed under them should be sent by mail addressed to: ATTN: Document Control Desk, Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001; by hand delivery to the NRC's offices at 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland; or, where practicable, by electronic submission, for example, via Electronic Information Exchange, or CD-ROM. Electronic submissions must be made in a manner that enables the NRC to receive, read, authenticate, distribute, and archive the submission, and process and retrieve it a single page at a time. Detailed guidance on making electronic submissions can be obtained by visiting the NRC's Web site at *http://www.nrc.gov/site-help/e-submittals.html;* by e-mail to *MSHD.Resource@nrc.gov;* or by writing the Office of the Chief Information Officer, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001. The guidance discusses, among other topics, the formats the NRC can accept, the use of electronic signatures, and the treatment of nonpublic information. Copies should be sent to the appropriate Regional Office and Resident Inspector.

[73 FR 5726, Jan. 31, 2008, as amended at 74 FR 62686, Dec. 1, 2009; 80 FR 74982, Dec. 1, 2015; 84 FR 65646, Nov. 29, 2019]
Editorial Note on Part 61
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 61 appear at 80 FR 74980, Dec. 1, 2015, and at 81 FR 86909, Dec. 2, 2016.

§ 61.27 Application for renewal or closure. ( a ) Any expiration date on a license applies only to the above ground activities and to the authority to dispose of waste. Failure to renew the license shall not relieve the licensee of responsibility for carrying out site closure, postclosure observation and transfer of the license to the site owner. An application for renewal or an application for closure under § 61.28 must be filed at least 30 days prior to license expiration.
( b ) Applications for renewal of a license must be filed in accordance with §§ 61.10 through 61.16 and § 61.20. Applications for closure must be filed in accordance with §§ 61.20 and 61.28. Information contained in previous applications, statements or reports filed with the Commission under the license may be incorporated by reference if the references are clear and specific.
( c ) In any case in which a licensee has timely filed an application for renewal of a license, the license for continued receipt and disposal of licensed materials does not expire until the Commission has taken final action on the application for renewal.
( d ) In determining whether a license will be renewed, the Commission will apply the criteria set forth in § 61.23.