alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
2008-0238.

#### Springfield v. Dot.Com Invest. Holdings, Ltd.

Clark App. Nos. 2008CA04, 2008CA05, 2008CA06, and 2008CA07. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal and claimed appeal of right. Upon consideration of appellants’ motion for stay of the court of appeals’ judgment,

It is ordered by the court that the motion is denied.
Editorial Note on Part 40
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 40 appear at 79 FR 75740, Dec. 19, 2014.

§ 40.12 Carriers. ( a ) Except as specified in paragraph (b) of this section, common and contract carriers, freight forwarders, warehousemen, and the U.S. Postal Service are exempt from the regulations in this part and the requirements for a license set forth in section 62 of the Act to the extent that they transport or store source material in the regular course of the carriage for another or storage incident thereto.
( b ) The exemption in paragraph (a) of this section does not apply to a person who possesses a transient shipment (as defined in § 40.4(r)), an import shipment, or an export shipment of natural uranium in an amount exceeding 500 kilograms, unless the shipment is in the form of ore or ore residue.
[52 FR 9651, Mar. 26, 1987]
#### MANNUZZA, Respondent, v. L. MUNDET & SON, Inc., et al., Appellants.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

November 27, 1914.)

Action by Cristofero Mannuzza against L. Mundet & Son, incorporated, and others. A. H. Gleason and T. H. Lord, both of New York City, for appellants. D. O. Hirsch, of New York City, for respondent.

No opinion. Judgment and order affirmed, costs. Order filed.
<PAGE>   1

                                 AMENDMENT NO. 1
                                       TO
                          SPECIAL TERMINATION AGREEMENT

     THIS AMENDMENT No. 1, dated as of July 1, 1997, to that certain Special
Termination Agreement (the "Agreement") that was amended and restated as of the
31st day of January, 1997 by and among Abington Bancorp, Inc., a Massachusetts
corporation, Abington Savings Bank, a Massachusetts savings bank, and James P.
McDonough, an individual currently employed by the Company and the Bank in the
capacity of President and Chief Executive Officer.

     NOW, THEREFORE, the parties to the Agreement hereby agree to amend the
Agreement as follows:

     1. Paragraph 4 of the Agreement is hereby amended by deleting the last
sentence thereof.

     2. As amended by this Amendment, the Agreement shall continue in full force
and effect in accordance with its terms.

     3. This Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts, all of
which taken together shall constitute one and the same instrument, and any of
the parties hereto may execute this Amendment by signing any such counterpart.

     4. This Amendment shall be governed by, and construed and enforced in
accordance with, the substantive laws of The Commonwealth of Massachusetts,
without regard to its principles of conflicts of laws.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment as of the day
and year first above written.



                                        ABINGTON BANCORP, INC.


                                        By: /s/ Robert M. Lallo
                                            ---------------------------------
                                            Its Treasurer



                                        ABINGTON SAVINGS BANK


                                        By: /s/ Edward J. Merritt
                                            ---------------------------------
                                            Its Executive Vice President



                                            /s/ James P. McDonough
                                            ---------------------------------
                                            James P. McDonough
#### Hector DeJesus an Infant, by His Mother and Natural Guardian, Caroline Rivera, et al., Appellants, v City of New York, Defendant, and New York City Housing Authority, Respondent.

[815 NYS2d 502]

*402Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Michael D. Stallman, J.), entered June 10, 2005, which granted defendants’ motion and cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

This action is barred by the doctrine of assumption of risk. The 14-year-old plaintiff, an experienced cyclist, should have realized that certain risks, including having to swerve to avoid a pedestrian or that his tire might come in contact with the abutting curb, causing him to fall, were inherent in riding a bike on a pedestrian-only cement walkway and are not dangers over and above the usual dangers associated with bicycle riding in an urban area *(see Chrem v City of New York,*293 AD2d 301 [2002]).

Even if assumption of risk did not operate as a complete bar, plaintiffs have failed to raise an issue of fact as to the existence of a dangerous condition. Although plaintiffs claimed that the walkway, the curb, or both, was “broken,” plaintiffs’ photographs show only that the curb was not continuous. Defendant Housing Authority is under no common-law or statutory duty to have continuous curbs, or any curb at all for that matter, along pedestrian pathways in housing developments. Furthermore, plaintiffs are unable to show, without resorting to speculation, that the absence of a continuous curb was a substantial cause of the infant plaintiffs accident *(see Omer v Rodriguez,*294 AD2d 202 [2002]). Concur—Buckley, P.J., Mazzarelli, Friedman, Sweeny and McGuire, JJ.
H. Res. 583

In the House of Representatives, U.S., 

December 7, 2005.

Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it 

shall be in order without intervention of any point of order 

to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 4340) to implement 

the United States-Bahrain Free Trade Agreement. The bill 

shall be considered as read. The bill shall be debatable for 

two hours equally divided and controlled by the chairman and 

ranking minority member of the Committee on Ways and 

Means. Pursuant to section 151 of the Trade Act of 1974, 

the previous question shall be considered as ordered on the 

bill to final passage without intervening motion. 

SEC. 2. During consideration of H.R. 4340 pursuant to 

this resolution, notwithstanding the operation of the previous 

question, the Chair may postpone further consideration of the 
2

•HRES 583 EH 

bill to a time designated by the Speaker in consonance with 

section 151 of the Trade Act of 1974.

Attest:

Clerk.
H. Res. 671

In the House of Representatives, U.S., 

February 8, 2006.

Resolved, That the following named Members be, and 

they are hereby, elected to the following standing committees 

of the House of Representatives: 

COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS: Mr. DeLay to rank 

after Mr. Wolf. 

COMMITTEE ON THE BUDGET: Mr. Campbell. 

COMMITTEE ON ENERGY AND COMMERCE: Mr. Blunt to 

rank after Mr. Fossella. 

COMMITTEE ON FINANCIAL SERVICES: Mr. Campbell. 

COMMITTEE ON VETERANS’ AFFAIRS: Mr. Campbell. 

Attest:

Clerk.
# PGI 232.1001 Policy.

(a) *Contracting officer action*. Performance-based payments are not practical for use on all fixed-price contracts and require considerable effort between the contractor and Government to identify the appropriate performance-based payment events and establish the proper completion criteria for those events. Additionally, FAR 32.1003 prohibits contracts from having both progress payments and performance-based payment financing on a contract at the same time. Additional information and instruction on performance-based payments are provided in the DoD Performance-based Payments Guide on the Defense Pricing and Contracting (Price, Cost and Finance) website under Pricing Topics, Performance Based Payment.             See             https://www.acq.osd.mil/asda/dpc/pcf/docs/resources-training/Performanc....          

**Parent topic:**PGI 232.10 -PERFORMANCE-BASED PAYMENTS
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 619 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 619

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                     December 16, 2005.
    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in order 
without intervention of any point of order to consider in the House the 
resolution (H. Res. 612) expressing the commitment of the House of 
Representatives to achieving victory in Iraq. The resolution shall be considered 
as read. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the resolution 
and preamble to final adoption without intervening motion or demand for division 
of the question except: (1) one hour of debate equally divided and controlled by 
the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on International 
Relations; and (2) one motion to recommit which may not contain instructions.
    Sec. 2. On the first legislative day of the second session of the One 
Hundred Ninth Congress, the House shall not conduct organizational or 
legislative business.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
#### RESTIVO v. BRADLEY CONTRACTING CO., et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

December 11, 1914.)

Action by Maddalena Restivo. as administratrix, etc., against the Bradley Contracting Company and Francis L. Corrao.

No opinion. Motion for reargument of 150 N. Y. Supp. 1108, denied, without costs.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-7077 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

CASHMERE CAZEAU,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr., Senior

District Judge. (CR-93-131)

Submitted: January 26, 2006 Decided: February 1, 2006

Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Cashmere Cazeau, Appellant Pro Se. Kevin Michael Comstock,

Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Cashmere Cazeau seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying relief on his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion, which the

district court properly construed as a successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255

(2000) motion. An appeal may not be taken from the final order in

a § 2255 proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A

certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial

showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district

court’s assessment of his constitutional claims is debatable and

that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are

also debatable or wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322,

336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v.

Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently

reviewed the record and conclude that Cazeau has not made the

requisite showing. 

Additionally, we construe Cazeau’s notice of appeal and

informal brief on appeal as an application to file a second or

successive § 2255 motion. See United States v. Winestock, 340 F.3d

200, 208 (4th Cir. 2003). In order to obtain authorization to file

a successive § 2255 motion, a prisoner must assert claims based on

either: (1) a new rule of constitutional law, previously
- 3 -

unavailable, made retroactive by the Supreme Court to cases on

collateral review; or (2) newly discovered evidence sufficient to

establish that no reasonable fact finder would have found the

movant guilty. 28 U.S.C. §§ 2244(b)(3)(C), 2255 (2000). Cazeau’s

claim does not satisfy either of these conditions. 

For these reasons, we deny a certificate of

appealability, decline to authorize Cazeau to file a successive

§ 2255 motion, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### § 820.65 Implementation plan.

With respect to a DOE Nuclear Safety Requirement for which there is no regulatory provision for an implementation plan or schedule, an exemption may be granted to establish an implementation plan which reasonably demonstrates that full compliance with the requirement will be achieved within two years of the effective date of the requirement without a determination of special circumstances under § 820.62(d).
#### Caryn Welsh, Respondent, v New York City Transit Authority, Appellant.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, defendant appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated October 29, 1979, as denied the branch of its motion for a protective order which sought to vacate plaintiffs notice for discovery and inspection with respect to certain physical descriptions of a number of defendant’s employees. Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, with $50 costs and disbursements. It was not an abuse of discretion for Special Term to deny the said branch of the motion for a protective order. Defendant is not compelled to prepare new documents not previously in existence. Hopkins, J. P., Mangano, O’Connor and Weinstein, JJ., concur.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Staff

# Information Digest, 2022–2023 (NUREG-1350, Volume 34)

*This page includes links to files in non-HTML format. See Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools for more information.*

## Publication Information

**Date Published:** February 2023

Office of Public AffairsU.S. Nuclear Regulatory CommissionWashington, DC 20555-0001

Availability Notice

## Abstract

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) has published the Information Digest annually since 1989. Beginning with this edition, the Digest will begin a 2-year publication cycle. The Digest provides information about agency activities and licensees from the various industries it regulates. It describes the agency’s responsibilities and activities and provides general information on nuclear-related topics. The Information Digest includes NRC and industry data in an easy-to-read format. Infographics help explain the information with visual aids.

The 2022–2023 Information Digest includes NRC data and non-NRC data (e.g., International Atomic Energy Agency, Energy Information Administration, and U.S. Department of Energy), which were updated as of September 30, 2022, including data in maps and graphics. Beginning with this edition, the Digest provides QR codes to direct users to the most current information. The next Information Digest containing updated data will be published in February 2025.

The NRC reviews the information from industry and international sources but does not independently verify it. The NRC is the source of all photographs, graphics, and tables unless otherwise noted. All information is final unless otherwise noted. Any corrections and updates will appear in the digital version of the publication on the NRC Web site.

The NRC welcomes comments or suggestions on the Information Digest. To submit comments, write to the Office of Public Affairs at U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001, or at opa.resource@nrc.gov. 

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, February 22, 2023
#### § 71.89 Opening instructions.

Before delivery of a package to a carrier for transport, the licensee shall ensure that any special instructions needed to safely open the package have been sent to, or otherwise made available to, the consignee for the consignee's use in accordance with 10 CFR 20.1906(e).
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 426 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 426

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                     September 8, 2005.
    Resolved, That it shall be in order at any time on the legislative day of 
Thursday, September 8, 2005, for the Speaker to entertain motions that the House 
suspend the rules. The Speaker or his designee shall consult with the Minority 
Leader or her designee on the designation of any matter for consideration 
pursuant to this resolution.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Angel Hernandez, Appellant.

Supreme Court, Bronx County, rendered on June 28,' 1977, unanimously affirmed. The case is remitted to the Supreme Court, Bronx County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (subd 5). Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted. (See *Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Saunders,*52 AD2d 833.) We have reviewed this record and agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious points which could be raised on this appeal. Concur—Fein, J. P., Sandler, Ross, Bloom and Carro, JJ.
IV 

House Calendar No. 124 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 564 

[Report No. 109–308] 

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 

bill (H.R. 2528) making appropriations for military quality of life functions of the Department of Defense, military construction, the Department of Veterans Affairs, and related agencies for the fiscal year ending 

September 30, 2006, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 18 (legislative day, NOVEMBER 17), 2005 

Mr. GINGREY, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; 

which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

RESOLUTION 

Waiving points of order against the conference report to 

accompany the bill (H.R. 2528) making appropriations 

for military quality of life functions of the Department 

of Defense, military construction, the Department of Veterans Affairs, and related agencies for the fiscal year 

ending September 30, 2006, and for other purposes. 

1 Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it 

2 shall be in order to consider the conference report to ac3 company the bill (H.R. 2528) making appropriations for 
2 

HRES 564 RH 

1 military quality of life functions of the Department of De2 fense, military construction, the Department of Veterans 

3 Affairs, and related agencies for the fiscal year ending 

4 September 30, 2006, and for other purposes. All points 

5 of order against the conference report and against its con6 sideration are waived. The conference report shall be con7 sidered as read. 

House Calendar No. 124 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 564 

[Report No. 109–308] 

RESOLUTION 

Waiving points of order against the conference reNSeptember 30, 2006, and for other purposes. and related agencies for the fiscal year ending struction, the Department of Veterans Affairs, tions of the Department of Defense, military con- appropriations for military quality of life func- port to accompany the bill (H.R. 2528) making OVEMBER 18 (legislative day, NOVEMBER 17), 2005 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed
IV 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 571 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the deployment 

of United States forces in Iraq be terminated immediately. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 18, 2005 

Mr. HUNTER submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on International Relations 

NOVEMBER 18, 2005 

The Committee on International Relations discharged; considered and failed 

of adoption 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that 

the deployment of United States forces in Iraq be terminated immediately. 

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that the deployment of United States forces 

3 in Iraq be terminated immediately. 

Æ
IV 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 637 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the symbols and 

traditions of Christmas should be protected for use by those who celebrate Christmas. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 30, 2017 

Mr. LAMBORN (for himself, Mr. KING of Iowa, Mr. PEARCE, Mr. WEBER of 

Texas, Mr. JODY B. HICE of Georgia, Mr. COLE, Mr. BABIN, Mr. BOST, 

Mr. ROKITA, Mr. NORMAN, Mr. ADERHOLT, Mr. CONAWAY, Mr. THOMAS

J. ROONEY of Florida, Mr. NEWHOUSE, Mr. STEWART, Mr. WESTERMAN, 

Mr. HULTGREN, Mr. WENSTRUP, Mr. BANKS of Indiana, Mr. CARTER of 

Georgia, Mr. WILSON of South Carolina, Mrs. BLACKBURN, Mr. BARR, 

Mr. HUIZENGA, Mr. HARRIS, Mr. WALBERG, Mr. LAHOOD, Mr. FLORES, 

Mr. GRAVES of Louisiana, Mr. DAVIDSON, Mr. ALLEN, Mr. WILLIAMS, 

Mr. WITTMAN, Mr. ESTES of Kansas, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. LAMALFA, Mr. 

AUSTIN SCOTT of Georgia, Mr. GIBBS, Mr. YOHO, Mr. GOODLATTE, Mr. 

HARPER, Mr. WALKER, and Mrs. HARTZLER) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that 

the symbols and traditions of Christmas should be protected for use by those who celebrate Christmas. 

Whereas Christmas is a national holiday celebrated on December 25; and 

Whereas the Framers intended that the First Amendment of 

the Constitution, in prohibiting the establishment of reliVerDate Sep 11 2014 02:12 Dec 01, 2017 Jkt 079200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6300 E:\BILLS\HR637.IH HR637

SSpencer on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 637 IH 

gion, would not prohibit any mention of religion or reference to God in civic dialog: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) recognizes the importance of the symbols and tra3 ditions of Christmas; 

4 (2) strongly disapproves of attempts to ban ref5 erences to Christmas; and 

6 (3) expresses support for the use of these symbols 

7 and traditions by those who celebrate Christmas. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.2
 
 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
 
 I, Terry R. Lazar, Chief Financial Officer of PureSafe Water Systems, Inc. (the “Registrant”), hereby certify that the Form 10-Q of PureSafe Water Systems, Inc. for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2009 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended, and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
 
 Date:  August 13, 2009
/s/ Terry R. LazarTerry R. LazarChief Financial Officer
Tc 2 , 47 MIDENEffite Nev. 982, 989, 12 P.3d 953, 957 (2000) (this court will not disturb a sentence absent an abuse of discretion). Accordingly, we

ORDER the judgment of conviction AFFIRMED.

(A Hardesty Hardesty Parraguirre

cc: Hon. Gary Fairman, District Judge State Public Defender/Ely State Public Defender/Carson City Attorney General/Carson City Eureka County District Attorney Eureka County Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA (0) 1947A 2 J. J.
###### Editorial Note on Part 35

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 35 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

#### § 35.2092 Records of decay-in-storage.

A licensee shall maintain records of the disposal of licensed materials, as required by § 35.92, for 3 years. The record must include the date of the disposal, the survey instrument used, the background radiation level, the radiation level measured at the surface of each waste container, and the name of the individual who performed the survey.