alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-40375 Summary Calendar

DONALD R. FRANK, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus JACK GARNER; D. GROUNDS; J. HASSELL; D. HUDSON; K. BROWN; D. BROWN, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 5:96-CV-14

- - - - - - - - - - July 31, 1996 Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Donald R. Frank, #208829, appeals the dismissal of his civil rights suit as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d). We have reviewed the record and the decision of the district court and find no abuse of discretion in the district court's dismissal of Frank's claim of due process violations in his placement in lockdown. Accordingly, the judgment dismissing this claim as frivolous isNo. 96-40375 -2- AFFIRMED for essentially the reasons stated by the magistrate judge and adopted by the district
court. Frank v. Garner , No. 5:96-CV-014 (E.D. Tex. April 9, 1996). Frank's claims of Eighth Amendment violations during lockdown, constitutionally inadequate food, and denial of access to court have been abandoned by Frank's failure to brief these issues on appeal. See Yohey v. Collins , 985 F.2d 222, 224-25 (5th Cir. 1993). AFFIRMED.
H. R. 7318 

One Hundred Fifteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and eighteen 

An Act 

To amend the Federal Assets Sale and Transfer Act of 2016 to ensure that the 

Public Buildings Reform Board has adequate time to carry out the responsibilities 

of the Board, and for other purposes. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. FEDERAL ASSETS SALE. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—Section 4(c)(2) of the Federal Assets Sale 

and Transfer Act of 2016 (40 U.S.C. 1303 note; Public Law 114– 

287) is amended— 

(1) by striking subparagraph (B); 

(2) by striking the paragraph designation and heading and 

all that follows through ‘‘In selecting’’ in subparagraph (A) 

in the matter preceding clause (i) and inserting the following: 

‘‘(2) APPOINTMENTS.—In selecting’’; and 

(3) by redesignating clauses (i) through (iv) as subparagraphs (A) through (D), respectively, and indenting appropriately. 

(b) TERMINATION.—Section 10 of the Federal Assets Sale and 

Transfer Act of 2016 (40 U.S.C. 1303 note; Public Law 114–287) 

is amended by striking ‘‘the date of enactment of this Act’’ and 

inserting ‘‘the date on which the Board members are appointed 

pursuant to section 4’’. 

(c) ACCOUNTING SYSTEM.—Section 12(e) of the Federal Assets 

Sale and Transfer Act of 2016 (40 U.S.C. 1303 note; Public Law 

114–287) is amended in the first sentence by striking ‘‘the date 

of enactment of this Act’’ and inserting ‘‘the date on which the 

Board members are appointed pursuant to section 4’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
§ 60.183 Criminal penalties. ( a ) Section 223 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, provides for criminal sanctions for willful violation of, attempted violation of, or conspiracy to violate, any regulation issued under sections 161b, 161i, or 161o of the Act. For purposes of section 223, all the regulations in part 60 are issued under one or more of sections 161b, 161i, or 161o, except for the sections listed in paragraph (b) of this section.
( b ) The regulations in part 60 that are not issued under sections 161b, 161i, or 161o for the purposes of section 223 are as follows: §§ 60.1, 60.2, 60.3, 60.5, 60.6, 60.7, 60.8, 60.15, 60.16, 60.17, 60.18, 60.21, 60.22, 60.23, 60.24, 60.31, 60.32, 60.33, 60.41, 60.42, 60.43, 60.44, 60.45, 60.46, 60.51, 60.52, 60.61, 60.62, 60.63, 60.64, 60.65, 60.101, 60.102, 60.111, 60.112, 60.113, 60.121, 60.122, 60.130, 60.131, 60.132, 60.133, 60.134, 60.135, 60.137, 60.140, 60.141, 60.142, 60.143, 60.150, 60.151, 60.152, 60.162, 60.181, and 60.183.
[57 FR 55076, Nov. 24, 1992]
IV 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 576 

Celebrating Advancement Via Individual Determination’s 25 years of success. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 18, 2005 

Mrs. DAVIS of California (for herself, Mr. FILNER, Mr. DAVIS of Illinois, Mr. 

HONDA, Mr. FARR, Mr. SHERMAN, Mr. CASTLE, Mr. MANZULLO, Mr. 

WAXMAN, Mr. REYES, Mr. COOPER, Mr. CALVERT, Mr. BERMAN, and 

Mr. RUPPERSBERGER) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce 

RESOLUTION 

Celebrating Advancement Via Individual Determination’s 25 

years of success. 

Whereas Advancement Via Individual Determination (AVID) 

has provided academic and motivational support that has 

enabled more than 95 percent of the over 257,000 underperforming students who have been in its program to go 

on to college; 

Whereas Advancement Via Individual Determination has 

grown over 25 years to more than 2,200 middle and high 

schools in 36 States and Department of Defense schools 

in 15 countries; 

Whereas Advancement Via Individual Determination started 

in 1980 with one teacher, Mary Catherine Swanson, and 
2 

•HRES 576 IH 

32 high school students in San Diego, California, and developed into an easily replicated program that promotes 

academic success; 

Whereas students are selected because they are low-income, 

first-generation, college-going students who are underperforming academically; 

Whereas college students support the program with individual 

academic coaching; 

Whereas students are required to take a rigorous, college preparatory curriculum including advanced level courses; 

Whereas the program provides SAT/ACT preparation, college 

information and financial aid assistance, college visits, 

and motivational experiences; 

Whereas at the end of the first college year, 89 percent of 

Advancement Via Individual Determination students are 

fully eligible and do enroll for their sophomore year compared to a national average of 50 percent; and 

Whereas over 98,000 teachers and administrators have attended training in the high-quality teaching skills that 

support Advancement Via Individual Determination students: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) congratulates Advancement Via Individual 

3 Determination students and their teachers on in4 creasing college eligibility and attendance; and 

5 (2) celebrates Advancement Via Individual De6 termination’s 25 years of success. 

Æ
#### § 71.11 Protection of Safeguards Information.

Each licensee, certificate holder, or applicant for a Certificate of Compliance for a transportation package for transport of irradiated reactor fuel, strategic special nuclear material, a critical mass of special nuclear material, or byproduct material in quantities determined by the Commission through order or regulation to be significant to the public health and safety or the common defense and security, shall protect Safeguards Information against unauthorized disclosure in accordance with the requirements in § 73.21 and the requirements of § 73.22 or § 73.23 of this chapter, as applicable.

[73 FR 63572, Oct. 24, 2008]
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6808

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

TONY CURTIS BENTON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (CR-94-236-A, CA-99-523-AM)

Submitted: September 30, 1999 Decided: October 7, 1999

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tony Curtis Benton, Appellant Pro Se. Leslie Bonner McClendon,

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* Although the district court’s order is marked as “filed” on

April 23, 1999, the district court’s records show that it was

entered on the docket sheet on April 27, 1999. Pursuant to Rules

58 and 79(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is the

date that the order was entered on the docket sheet that we take as

the effective date of the district court’s decision. See Wilson v.

Murray, 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir. 1986).

2

PER CURIAM:

Tony Curtis Benton seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

1999). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of

the district court. See United States v. Benton, Nos. CR-94-236-A;

CA-99-523-AM (E.D. Va. Apr. 27, 1999).* We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the amended Quarterly Report of AccuPoll Holding Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Craig A. Hewitt, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


March 14, 2005                            /s/ Craig A. Hewitt
                                          --------------------------------------
                                              Craig A. Hewitt
                                              Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 642 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 642

   Requesting the President and directing the Secretary of State to 
  provide to the House of Representatives certain documents in their 
   possession relating to the Secretary of State's trip to Europe in 
                             December 2005.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 18, 2005

 Ms. Lee submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                  Committee on International Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Requesting the President and directing the Secretary of State to 
  provide to the House of Representatives certain documents in their 
   possession relating to the Secretary of State's trip to Europe in 
                             December 2005.

    Resolved, That the President is requested and the Secretary of 
State is directed to provide to the House of Representatives, not later 
than 14 days after the date of adoption of this resolution, all 
documents, including telephone and electronic mail records, logs, 
calendars, minutes, memoranda, and advisory legal opinions, in the 
possession of the President or the Secretary of State, respectively, 
from the Department of State provided to the Executive Office of the 
President in preparation for and during the Secretary of State's trip 
to Germany, Belgium, Romania, and Ukraine in December 2005, relating 
to--
            (1) United States policies under the United Nations 
        Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or 
        Degrading Treatment or Punishment toward individuals captured 
        by or transferred to the United States or detained in United 
        States custody; and
            (2) United States policies regarding any facility outside 
        of the territory of the United States for the detention of 
        individuals captured by or transferred to the United States or 
        detained in United States custody.
                                 <all>
```
Case 1:06-cr-00170-WHA-CSC Document 150 Filed 09/07/2006 Page 1 of 4
Case 1:06-cr-00170-WHA-CSC Document 150 Filed 09/07/2006 Page 2 of 4
Case 1:06-cr-00170-WHA-CSC Document 150 Filed 09/07/2006 Page 3 of 4
Case 1:06-cr-00170-WHA-CSC Document 150 Filed 09/07/2006 Page 4 of 4
usbank(logo)



Global Corporate
Trust

190 S. LaSalle
Street, 7th Floor

MK-IL-SL7C

Chicago, IL 60603



usbank.com





Annual Statement of Compliance

Morgan Stanley Bank of America Merrill Lynch
Trust 2013-C7



VIA: EMAIL



Morgan Stanley Capital I
Inc.

1585 Broadway

New York, New York 10036

Attention: Stephen Holmes

stephen.holmes@morganstanley.com



| | Re: | ThePooling and Servicing Agreement (the “Agreement”)
dated as of January 1, 2013 among Morgan Stanley Capital I, Inc. as depositor, Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National
Association, as master servicer and special servicer, Situs Holdings, LLC, as trust advisor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association,
as custodian and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee, certificate administrator, certificate registrar and authenticating
agent
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



I, Kimberly O. Jacobs,
a Senior Vice President of U.S. Bank National Association, as Certificate Administrator, as a certifying servicer hereby certify
that:



(1) A review of the activities
of the Certificate Administrator during the preceding calendar year (the “Reporting Period”) and of the performance
of the Certificate Administrator under the Agreement has been made under my supervision; and



(2) To the best of my knowledge,
based on such review, the Certificate Administrator has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects
throughout such Reporting Period



Capitalized terms used
but not defined herein have the meanings set forth in the Agreement.



Date: March 1, 2019



U.S. Bank National Association as Certificate
Administrator



| | By: | /s/ Kimberly O.
Jacobs                   | 
| | --- | ---------------------------------------- | 
| |     | Kimberly O. Jacobs
Senior Vice President |
§ 73.74 Requirement for advance notice and protection of import shipments of nuclear material from countries that are not party to the Convention on the Physical Protection of Nuclear Material. ( a ) A licensee authorized to import special nuclear material of low strategic significance from a country not a party to the Convention on the Physical Protection of Nuclear Material (*i.e.*, not listed in appendix F of this part) shall: ( 1 ) Notify in writing the Director, Office of Nuclear Security and Incident Response, by email (preferred method) to *AdvanceNotifications.Resource@nrc.gov* or by using any appropriate method listed in § 73.4;
( 2 ) Assure that the notification will be received at least 10 days before transport of the shipment commences at the shipper's facility; and
( 3 ) Include the following information in the notification: ( i ) The name(s), address(es) and telephone number(s) of the shipper, receiver, and carrier(s);
( ii ) A physical description of the shipment (the isotopes, enrichment, quantity, etc.);
( iii ) A listing of mode(s) of shipment, transfer points, and routes to be used;
( iv ) The estimated time and date that shipment will commence and that each country along the route is scheduled to be entered; and
( v ) The estimated time and date of arrival of the shipment at the destination.
( b ) A licensee who needs to amend a written advance notification required by paragraph (a) of this section may notify the NRC Headquarters Operations Center by telephone at the numbers listed in appendix A to this part.
( c ) A licensee authorized to import from a country not a party to the Convention on the Physical Protection of Nuclear Material (*i.e.*, not listed in appendix F of this part) a formula quantity of special nuclear material, special nuclear material of moderate strategic significance, special nuclear material of low strategic significance, or irradiated reactor fuel shall assure that during transport outside the United States the shipment will be protected in accordance with Annex I to the Convention on the Physical Protection of Nuclear Material (see appendix E of this part).
[52 FR 9654, Mar. 26, 1987, as amended at 53 FR 4112, Feb. 12, 1988; 60 FR 24553, May 9, 1995; 67 FR 3586, Jan. 25, 2002; 68 FR 58820, Oct. 10, 2003; 74 FR 62684, Dec. 1, 2009; 83 FR 58723, Nov. 21, 2018; 86 FR 67843, Nov. 30, 2021]
January 13, 2015

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

THE CITY OF GALVESTON, TEXAS, Appellant

NO. 14-14-00222-CV V.

JOE MURPHY, YORAM BEN-AMRAM, AND GALTEX DEVELOPMENT, 

LLC, Appellees

________________________________

This cause, an interlocutory appeal from the order denying appellant City of 

Galveston’s motion to dismiss for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction, in favor of 

appellees, Joe Murphy, Yoram Ben-Amram, and Galtex Development, LLC, 

signed February 28, 2014, was heard on the transcript of the record. We have 

inspected the record and find the trial court erred in failing to grant the motion in 

part. We therefore order that the order that denied the City’s motion to dismiss

with regard to appellees’ takings claims based on the City’s denial of appellees’ 

Special Use Permit is REVERSED in part and RENDER judgment dismissing 

such claims. 

Further, we order that the order is AFFIRMED in part with regard to 

appellees’ takings claims based on the City’s revocation of the property at issue’s 

grandfathered non-conforming status.

We order that each party shall pay its costs by reason of this appeal.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
#### § 603.1275 In-kind contributions.

The value of non-cash contributions made by a recipient or non-Federal third parties toward cost sharing.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, *

*

*

v. * CASE NO. 2:0600198-WKW-CSC-1

*

RONALD MCQUEEN *

NOTICE OF APPEAL

Comes now Defendant Ronald McQueen by and through undersigned Counsel, and gives

Notice of Appeal from his conviction and sentencing on March 20, 2007.

Respectfully submitted,

s/Susan G. James

SUSAN G. JAMES

Attorney at Law

600 South McDonough Street

Montgomery, Alabama 36104

Phone: (334) 269-3330

Fax: (334) 834-0353

E-mail: sgjamesandassoc@aol.com

Bar No: JAM012

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on March 29, 2007, I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk

of Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing to Tommie

Hardwick, United States Attorney, P.O. Box 197, Montgomery, Alabama, 36101

Respectfully submitted,

s/Susan G. James

SUSAN G. JAMES

600 South McDonough Street

Montgomery, Alabama 36104

Phone: (334) 269-3330

Fax: (334) 834-0353

E-mail: sgjamesandassoc@aol.com

Bar No: JAM012

Case 2:06-cr-00198-WKW-CSC Document 53 Filed 03/29/2007 Page 1 of 1
MEMORANDUM 

DATE: 11/14/14

TO: Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket Id: OAR–2013-0602

FROM: Ray Saracino, EPA Region 9

SUBJECT: November 14, 2014 Meeting with Northern Arizona University (NAU) Regarding 

Proposed Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants

SUMMARY

A meeting was held between EPA and the attendees listed below on November 14, 2014

to discuss the proposed Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants. The Clean Power Plan for 

Existing Power Plants was proposed on June 2, 2014 and published in the Federal Register on 

June 18, 2014.

ATTENDEES

External Stakeholders

Jeff Downard, NAU

Fletcher Wilkinson, NAU

Jeff Busan, NAU

Steve Burr, ADEQ

Tai Wallace, ADEQ

EPA 

Ray Saracino

Attachment

Filename: 111(d) Docket Memo Attachment_NAU Questions for EPA and ADEQ
#### § 707.1 Purpose.

The Department of Energy (DOE) promulgates this part in order to protect the environment, maintain public health and safety, and safeguard the national security. This part establishes policies, criteria, and procedures for developing and implementing programs that help to maintain a workplace free from the use of illegal drugs. It applies to DOE contractors and subcontractors performing work at sites owned or controlled by DOE and operated under the authority of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, and to individuals with unescorted access to the control areas of certain DOE reactors. The procedures include detection of the use of illegal drugs by current or prospective contractor employees in testing designated positions.
Editorial Note on Part 35
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 35 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

§ 35.3204 Report and notification for an eluate exceeding permissible molybdenum-99, strontium-82, and strontium-85 concentrations. ( a ) The licensee shall notify by telephone the NRC Operations Center and the distributor of the generator within 7 calendar days after discovery that an eluate exceeded the permissible concentration listed in § 35.204(a) at the time of generator elution. The telephone report to the NRC must include the manufacturer, model number, and serial number (or lot number) of the generator; the results of the measurement; the date of the measurement; whether dosages were administered to patients or human research subjects, when the distributor was notified, and the action taken.
( b ) By an appropriate method listed in § 30.6(a) of this chapter, the licensee shall submit a written report to the appropriate NRC Regional Office listed in § 30.6 of this chapter within 30 calendar days after discovery of an eluate exceeding the permissible concentration at the time of generator elution. The written report must include the action taken by the licensee; the patient dose assessment; the methodology used to make this dose assessment if the eluate was administered to patients or human research subjects; and the probable cause and an assessment of failure in the licensee's equipment, procedures or training that contributed to the excessive readings if an error occurred in the licensee's breakthrough determination; and the information in the telephone report as required by paragraph (a) of this section.
[83 FR 33111, July 16, 2018]