alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31

Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Toni Ann Tantillo, certify that:

1) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of SITI-Sites.com, Inc.
(the "Registrant")

2) Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4) The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

      a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

      b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

      c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation
as of the Evaluation Date;

5) The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the audit committee of registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

      a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified any material
weaknesses in internal controls; and

      b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6) The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: August 13, 2004


                                  By /s/ Toni Ann Tantillo
                                     ---------------------
                                         Toni Ann Tantillo
                                         Chief Financial Officer,
                                         Vice President, Secretary and Treasurer


                                       14
Exhibit 10.37


 


RESOLUTIONS


 


Director
Compensation


 


The following resolutions were
adopted by The Allstate Corporation’s Board of Directors on September 14,
2009.


 


RESOLVED, effective June 1,
2010, that directors who are not officers or employees of the Corporation or
any of its subsidiaries (each a “Non-Employee Director”) shall be entitled to
receive for their services as directors a quarterly cash retainer in the amount
of $17,500 (“Quarterly Retainer”), to be paid on each June 1, September 1,
December 1, and March 1 (each a “Quarterly Payment Date”) to each
Non-Employee Director serving as a director on such date.


 


FURTHER RESOLVED,
effective June 1, 2010, that each Non-Employee Director who serves as a
chair of a committee of the Corporation’s Board of Directors shall be entitled
to receive an additional quarterly chair fee for each such chair, in the amount
of $3,750 (“Quarterly Chair Fee”), to be paid on each Quarterly Payment Date to
each Non-Employee Director serving as a committee chair on such date.


 


FURTHER RESOLVED,
effective June 1, 2010, that any Non-Employee Director initially elected or appointed to the Board or initially appointed as a committee chair effective on any
date other than a Quarterly Payment Date shall be entitled to receive on the
Quarterly Payment Date following the date he or she joins the Board or becomes
such chair, as the case may be, an additional one-time fee in an amount equal
to the Quarterly Retainer or Quarterly Chair Fee, as the case may be,
multiplied by a fraction, the numerator of which is the number of calendar days
such Non-Employee Director has served on the Board or as such chair prior to
such Quarterly Payment Date and the denominator of which is 91.


 


FURTHER RESOLVED, that on
June 1 of each year, each Non-Employee Director who is serving as a
director on that date shall be entitled to receive a number of restricted stock
units (“RSUs”) equal to $150,000 divided by the Fair Market Value, as defined
in the 2006 Equity Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors (“Plan”), of
the Corporation’s common stock as of such June 1, with any fractional
amount rounded up to the next whole RSU.


 


FURTHER RESOLVED, that
any Non-Employee Director initially
elected or appointed to the Board effective on any date other than June 1 shall
be entitled to receive on the date he or she joins the Board, a number of RSUs
equal to $150,000 divided by the Fair Market Value, as defined in the Plan, of
the Corporation’s common stock as of the date the Non-Employee Director joins
the Board, multiplied by a fraction, the numerator of which is the number of
full calendar months from such date until the following May 31 and the
denominator of which is 12, with any fractional amount rounded to the next
whole RSU.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Erenio Laboy, Appellant.

Judgment Supreme Court, Bronx County, rendered on May 5, 1978, unanimously affirmed. Application by appellant’s counsel to withdraw as counsel is granted. (See *Anders v California,*386 US 738; *People v Saunders,*52 AD2d 833.) We have reviewed this record and agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious points which could be raised on this appeal. Concur—Fein, J. P., Sandler, Ross, Bloom and Carro, JJ.
#### § 97.176 Fees payable in advance.

Fees and charges shall be paid at the time of making application or at the time of submitting a request for any action by the Office for which a fee or charge is payable and established in this part.
EX-34.7
(logo) pwc


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors, PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.:

We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying Report on
Assessment of Compliance with Regulation AB Servicing Criteria, that Midland
Loan Services, a division of PNC Bank, National Association ("Midland" or the
"Company") complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the
Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for the commercial
mortgage-backed securities transactions (the "Platform"), as of December 31,
2013 and for the year then ended, excluding criteria 1122(d)(1)(iii),
1122(d)(3)(i)(B), 1122(d)(3)(i)(C), 1122(d)(3)(i)(D), 1122(d)(3)(ii),
1122(d)(3)(iii), 1122(d)(3)(iv), and 1122(d)(4)(xv), which the Company has
determined are not applicable to the servicing activities performed by it with
respect to the Platform. Management is responsible for the Company's compliance
with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on
management's assertion based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly,
included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance
with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as
we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing
of selected asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform,
testing of selected servicing activities related to the Platform, and
determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and
performed those selected activities in compliance with the applicable servicing
criteria. Our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing
activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report.
Our procedures were not designed to detect noncompliance arising from errors
that may have occurred prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have
affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during
the period covered by this report. We believe that our examination provides a
reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal
determination on the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, management's assertion that Midland complied with the
aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2013 for the Platform is fairly stated, in all material respects.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

February 24, 2014


PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, 1100 Walnut, Suite 1300, Kansas City, MO 64106
T: (816) 472 7921, F: (816) 218 1890, www.pwc.com/us
#### § 603.565 Use of a hybrid instrument.

For a RD&D project that is to be carried out by a number of participants, the contracting officer may award a TIA that provides for some participants to perform under fixed-support arrangements and others to perform under expenditure-based arrangements. This approach may be useful, for example, if a commercial firm that is a participant will not accept an agreement with all of the post-award requirements of an expenditure-based award. Before using a fixed-support arrangement for that firm's portion of the project, the agreement must meet the criteria in § 603.305.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<CIK> 0000812146
<NAME> ABINGTON BANCORP
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLAR
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          12,872
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                   216
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    190,551
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        330,378
<ALLOWANCE>                                    (2,908)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 559,778
<DEPOSITS>                                     348,792
<SHORT-TERM>                                    27,657
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              6,638
<LONG-TERM>                                    130,500
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           11,915
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           480
<OTHER-SE>                                      33,796
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 559,778
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 19,702
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                8,734
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    94
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                28,530
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               8,776
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              16,172
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           12,358
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      570
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               1,388
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 11,768
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,175
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       5,175
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,355
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .95
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .89
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.39
<LOANS-NON>                                        588
<LOANS-PAST>                                        22
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 2,280
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      176
<RECOVERIES>                                       234
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                2,908
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,789
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          1,119
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                            2059
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      226
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  3139
<PP&E>                                           28436
<DEPRECIATION>                                   12520
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   19221
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              770
<BONDS>                                          12357
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                        6094
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     19221
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  2723
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     1707
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   787
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  2000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 629
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (2400)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (2400)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (2400)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (79.20)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (79.20)
        

</TABLE>
###### Editorial Note on Part 63

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 63 appear at 81 FR 86909, Dec. 2, 2016.

#### § 63.201 Purpose and scope.

This subpart covers the storage of radioactive material by DOE in the Yucca Mountain repository and on the Yucca Mountain site. For the purposes of demonstrating compliance with this subpart, to the extent there may be any conflict with the requirements specified in this subpart and the requirements contained in Subparts A-J of this regulation, including definitions, the requirements in this subpart shall take precedence.
[No. 9516.

Department One.

October 26, 1911.]

#### The State of Washington, *on the Relation of C. Hofstetter, Plaintiff,*v. Ben Sheeks, *Judge etc., Respondent.**1*

Appeal — -Record—Statement of Facts — Proposing and Certifying. Where, in making up a proposed statement of facts, the trial judge ordered appellant’s statement of his evidence in narrative form stricken out and the full stenographer’s report thereof added, the appellant is not entitled to have the statement certified by adding the stenographer’s report without striking out the objectionable part as ordered.

Application filed in the supreme court September 29, 1911, for a writ of mandamus to compel the superior court for King county, Sheeks, J., to certify a proposed statement of facts.

Denied.

*L. H. Wheeler,*for relator.

*Roberts, Battle, Hulbert & Tennant*and *Geo. R. Biddle,*for respondent.

1

 Reported in 118 Pac. 308.

Per Curiam.

— This is a second application for a writ of mandate. See former opinion, *State ex rel. Hofstetter v. Sheeks,*63 Wash. 408, 115 Pac. 859. In speaking to the merits, after an answer had been filed to the first writ, we said:

> “But the trial judge having certified to this court that the proposed statement is in some respects untrue, the writ will issue, with directions to the lower court to specify his objections so that .the relator may have formal opportunity to comply with his demands. ‘The court should, if in its judgment the statement omitted certain material evidence or proceedings, order the insertion thereof in the record, and continue so to order until it could properly make its certificate in the language of the statute.’ *State ex rel. Roberts v. Clifford, supra.”*

The relator states in his application, “that the said judge . ordered and directed that the whole of affiant’s, plaintiff’s, *411testimony embraced in plaintiff’s original proposed statement of facts should be stricken.” He has not complied with this requirement, which we think was a reasonable one. This was pointed out to him by the letter of the respondent, wherein he states : “One complete statement should be made up by omitting what I ordered stricken from your proposed statement and by inserting what I ordered added.” The relator has added one hundred and twenty-seven pages to the original statement of facts, and has duplicated his own testimony. A part of the original statement is in the narrative. It is possible, therefore, that there may be a conflict between the substance of the testimony as prepared by the relator in the original statement and a verbatim copy of the testimony as transcribed by the reporter. A compliance with the court’s suggestion will at least avoid confusion and repetition. The relator has seemingly complied with all of the court’s order except that he has not stricken his own testimony from the original statement.

The writ is denied.
Editorial Note on Part 70
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 70 appear at 81 FR 86910, Dec. 2, 2016.

§ 70.82 Suspension and operation in war or national emergency. Whenever Congress declares that a state of war or national emergency exists, the Commission, if it finds it necessary to the common defense and security may, ( a ) Suspend any license it has issued.
( b ) Order the recapture of special nuclear material.
( c ) Order the operation of any licensed facility.
( d ) Order entry into any plant or facility in order to recapture special nuclear material or to operate the facility. Just compensation shall be paid for any damages caused by recapture of special nuclear material or by operation of any facility, pursuant to this section.
[21 FR 764, Feb. 3, 1956, as amended at 32 FR 4056, Mar. 15, 1967; 35 FR 11461, July 17, 1970. Redesignated at 65 FR 56226, Sept. 18, 2000]
Exhibit 35.3












ANNUAL STATEMENT AS TO COMPLIANCE

COMM 2013-CCRE6

The undersigned, David Co, a Director of Deutsche Bank Trust
Company Americas, as the Certificate Administrator (a “Certifying Servicer”) under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement,
dated as of March 1, 2013 (the “Agreement”), by and among, Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation, as
Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Special Servicer,
U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Certificate Administrator, Paying Agent and
Custodian, and Park Bridge Lender Services LLC, as Operating Advisor, here by certifies in accordance with Section 10.11 of the
Agreement:



| | A) | A review of such Certifying Servicer’s activities from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2016 (the “reporting period”)
and of such Certifying Servicer’s performance under the Agreement has been made under such officer’s supervision and
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | B) | That, as to the best of such officer’s knowledge, based on such review, such Certifying Servicer has fulfilled all its
obligations under the Agreement, in all material respects throughout the reporting period.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS

as Certificate Administrator





BY: David Co

Title: Director

Date: March 1, 2017
**Exhibit 32.2**

**Certification of Chief financial Officer Under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

The undersigned officer of First National Lincoln Corporation (the "Company") hereby certifies that the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005 to which this certification is being furnished as an exhibit (the "Report"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. This certification is provided pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K ("Item 601(b)(32)") promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"), and the Exchange Act. In accordance with clause (ii) of Item 601(b)(32),this certification (A) shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and (B) shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.

 

Date: November 9, 2005

 

/s/ F. Stephen Ward

F. Stephen Ward

Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer

First National Lincoln Corporation

 

 

Page 1
2419.812 Contract administration.       (e) Awards under the Partnership Agreement cited in 2419.800 are subject to 15 U.S.C. 637(a)(21). These contracts contain the clause at 2452.219-71, Section 8(a) Direct Award (Deviation), which requires the 8(a) contractor to notify the SBA and the HUD contracting officer when ownership of the firm is being transferred.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 2419.8 - Small Business Administration Section (8)(a) Program