alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### HILTON v. HILTON.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

May 29, 1914.)

Action by Fred Hilton against Hobart Hilton.

No opinion. Defendant’s motion for new trial denied, with costs.
# FILED
December 23, 1997 Cecil Crowson, Jr. Appellate C ourt Clerk IN THE COURT OF CR IMINAL A PPEALS OF TENN ESSEE AT KNOXVILLE JUNE 1997 SESSION

DONALD WAYNE HOLT, ) ) C.C.A. NO. 03C 01-9702-CR-00059 Appellant, ) ) JOHNSON COUNTY VS. ) ) HON. LYNN W. BROWN, HOWARD CARLTON and ) JUDGE STATE OF TENN ESSEE ) ) Appellees. ) (Habeas corpus)

FOR THE APPE LLANT: FOR THE APPELLEE: KENNETH F. IRVINE, JR. JOHN KNOX WALKUP 606 W. Main St., Suite 350 Attorney General & Repor ter P.O. Box 84 Knoxville, TN 37901-0084 SANDY R. COPOUS Asst. Attorney General 450 Jame s Roberts on Pkwy. Nashville, TN 37243-0493 DAVID CROCKETT District Attorney General Route 19, Box 99 Johnson City, TN 37601

OPINION FILED:____________________

AFFIRMED JOHN H. PEAY, Judge1 The petiti oner also cl aims in his pet iti on that t he indict ment was not signed by the dist rict attorney general. However, thi s issue has not be en briefed andis theref ore waived. Tenn. Crim. App. R. 10( b). Moreov

er, the copy o

f th e in dict ment i nclu ded i n the recor d cont ains the s igna

tur e of Guy

R. Dotson, who was the di strict attorney

general of Rut herford County at the t ime. This issue meri ts no further di scussion. 2 O P I N I O N

The petitioner filed his petiti on forwrit of habeas corpus on Sep tember 18, 1996, alleging that his 1991 conviction for aggr avated rape is void bec ause it is based upon an invalid indictment. Specifically , he claims that the indictment fails to allege the necessary mens rea element and that his conviction must there fore be reversed and dismissed pursuant to this Court’s opinion in Sta te v. Roger Dale Hill, Sr. , No. 01C01- 9508-CC-00267, Wayne County (Tenn. Crim. App. filed Ju ne 20, 1996, at Nashville). 1 The court below summarily dismissed the defendant’s petiti on, finding that it fails to s tate a claim upon which reli ef could be granted. Th e d ef en da nt now a pp ea ls . We

affirm the judgmen t below.

In Hill , this Court held that an indictment for agg ravated rape alleging that the defendant had “unlawfully sex ually penetrate[d]” the v ictim was

insufficient because it did not allege a culpable mental state. However, our Supr eme Court has overruled this Court’s decision in Hill , holding that aggravated rape “is committable only if the principal actor's mens rea is intentional, knowing, or reckl ess. Thus, the required mental state may be inferred from the nature of the criminal conduct alleged.” State v. Hill , __ S.W.2d __ (Tenn. 1997) (footnote omitted).

In this case, the petitioner was also charged w ith aggravated rape, the indictment

alleging that he “unlawfully did sexually penetrate and cause bodily i njury to” the victim. Under our Supreme Court's analysis in Hill , this indictment is adequate. This3

issue is therefore wit hout merit.

The judgment below is affirmed.

________ _____________________ ___ _ JOHN H. PEAY, Judge

CONCUR:

______________________________ JOSEPH M. TIPT ON, Judge

______________________________ CURWOOD W ITT, Judge
Editorial Note on Part 70
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 70 appear at 81 FR 86910, Dec. 2, 2016.

§ 70.66 Additional requirements for approval of license application. ( a ) An application for a license from an applicant subject to subpart H will be approved if the Commission determines that the applicant has complied with the requirements of §§ 70.21, 70.22, 70.23, and 70.60 through 70.65.
( b ) Submittals by existing licensees in accordance with § 70.62(c)(3)(i) will be approved if the Commission determines that: ( 1 ) The integrated safety analysis approach is in accordance with the requirements of §§ 70.61, 70.62(c)(1), and 70.62(c)(2); and
( 2 ) The schedule is in compliance with § 70.62(c)(3)(ii).
( c ) Submittals by existing licensees in accordance with § 70.62(c)(3)(ii) will be approved if the Commission determines that: ( 1 ) The requirements of § 70.65(b) are satisfied; and
( 2 ) The performance requirements in § 70.61 (b), (c) and (d) are satisfied, based on the information in the ISA Summary, together with other information submitted to NRC or available to NRC at the licensee's site.
Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Clean Systems Technology
Group, Ltd. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2004,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), David Robbins, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

           (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

Dated: April 12, 2005



By: /S/ YONA LIEBOWITZ
-----------------------
Yona Liebowitz
Chief Financial Officer


            This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
(logo)  RialtoCAPITAL   **2015 Annual Statement of Servicer Compliance (Item 1123)**  Pooling and Servicing Agreement (the “Pooling and Servicing Agreement”) dated as of December 1, 2012 by and among J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp., as Depositor, Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association as Master Servicer, Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC as Special Servicer, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association as Certificate Administrator, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association as Trustee and Pentalpha Surveillance LLC as Senior Trust Advisor relating to the J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Trust 2012-LC9, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2012-LC9 **(JPMCC 2012-LC9)**  The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as special servicer (the “Special Servicer”) herein certifies to the following: 1. All servicing activities and performance of such servicing activities under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement are performed on behalf of the Special Servicer. 2. A review of the servicing activities and performance by the Special Servicer for the period of January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2015 (the “Reporting Period”) in accordance with the Pooling and Servicing Agreement has been conducted under my supervision. 3. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Special Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the terms of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, in all material respects for the Reporting Period and if there has been a failure to fulfill any such obligations in any material respect, each failure and the nature and status thereof has been specifically identified herein.  Certified by: /s/ Adam SingerAdam Singer, Managing Director Date: March 1, 2016
#### § 50.56 Conversion of construction permit to license; or amendment of license.

Upon completion of the construction or alteration of a facility, in compliance with the terms and conditions of the construction permit and subject to any necessary testing of the facility for health or safety purposes, the Commission will, in the absence of good cause shown to the contrary, issue a license of the class for which the construction permit was issued or an appropriate amendment of the license, as the case may be.

[21 FR 355, Jan. 19, 1956, as amended at 35 FR 11461, July 17, 1970; 75 FR 73944, Nov. 30, 2010]
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE 

CORPORATION, a corporation organized 

and existing under the laws of the United 

States of America, its assignees and/or 

successors, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

 v. 

CHANHT REATREY KEO, 

Defendant-Appellant, 

and

JOHN ARAIZA; KENNETH 

MCCALLISTER, 

Defendants.

No. 20-16145 

D.C. No. 3:19-cv-02099-RS 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of California

Richard Seeborg, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 12, 2021**

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

OCT 15 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 20-16145 

Before: TALLMAN, RAWLINSON, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.

Chanht Reatrey Keo appeals pro se from the district court’s summary 

judgment in this unlawful detainer proceeding brought against her by Federal 

Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (“FHLMC”). We have jurisdiction under 28

U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Bravo v. City of Santa Maria, 665 F.3d 1076, 

1083 (9th Cir. 2011). We affirm.

The district court properly granted summary judgment for FHLMC because 

Keo failed to raise a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether the property 

was not sold in accordance with California’s statutory requirements for nonjudicial 

foreclosure sales or whether FHLMC did not duly perfect its title. See Cal. Civ. 

Proc. Code §§ 1161a(b)(3) (unlawful detainer actions following a trustee’s sale), 

1162 (notice-to-quit requirements); In re Perl, 811 F.3d 1120, 1128-29 (9th Cir. 

2016) (explaining that California law allows for only a “narrow and sharply 

focused examination of title” in an unlawful detainer action brought following a 

nonjudicial foreclosure sale); Dr. Leevil, LLC v. Westlake Health Care Ctr., 431 

P.3d 151, 157 (Cal. 2018) (“Matters affecting the validity of the trust deed or 

primary obligation itself, or other basic defects in the plaintiff’s title, are neither 

properly raised in [a] summary [unlawful detainer] proceeding for possession, nor 

are they concluded by the judgment.”).

Contrary to Keo’s contention, the district court did not err by entering 
3 20-16145 

summary judgment without holding a hearing. See N.D. Cal. Civ. R. 7-1(b) 

(motions may be decided without oral argument).

We reject as meritless Keo’s contention that the district court was biased 

against her.

We do not consider matters not specifically and distinctly raised and argued 

in the opening brief, or arguments and allegations raised for the first time on 

appeal. See Padgett v. Wright, 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).

Keo’s motion for stay of judgment pending appeal (Docket Entry No. 13)

and request for a stay pending appeal, set forth in the opening brief, are denied as 

moot.

AFFIRMED.
229 So.2d 112

#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Dolphus L. DULIN v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, et al.

No. 50273.

Dec. 18, 1969.

In re: Dolphus L. Dulin applying for writ of habeas corpus.

The application is denied. The showing made does not warrant the exercise of our supervisory or original jurisdiction.
§ 73.58 Safety/security interface requirements for nuclear power reactors. ( a ) Each operating nuclear power reactor licensee with a license issued under part 50 or 52 of this chapter shall comply with the requirements of this section.
( b ) The licensee shall assess and manage the potential for adverse effects on safety and security, including the site emergency plan, before implementing changes to plant configurations, facility conditions, or security.
( c ) The scope of changes to be assessed and managed must include planned and emergent activities (such as, but not limited to, physical modifications, procedural changes, changes to operator actions or security assignments, maintenance activities, system reconfiguration, access modification or restrictions, and changes to the security plan and its implementation).
( d ) Where potential conflicts are identified, the licensee shall communicate them to appropriate licensee personnel and take compensatory and/or mitigative actions to maintain safety and security under applicable Commission regulations, requirements, and license conditions.
[74 FR 13987, Mar. 27, 2009]
Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report  of The  Topps  Company,  Inc.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period  ended May 27,  2006,  as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the  "Report"),  I,
Catherine K. Jessup, Vice President-Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the
Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                                s/ Catherine K. Jessup
                                              --------------------------
                                                   Catherine K. Jessup
                                            Vice President, Chief Financial
                                                  Officer and Treasurer


Date:  July 6, 2006
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Judicial Conference of the United States

# AGENCY:

Judicial Conference of the United States Advisory Committee on Rules of Criminal Procedure. 

# ACTION:

Notice of Open Meeting.

# SUMMARY:

The Advisory Committee on Rules of Criminal Procedure will hold a two-day meeting. The meeting will be open to public observation but not participation. 

# DATES:

                        April 11-12, 2011.                         *Time:*                         8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.                     

# ADDRESS:

United States Court of Appeals, Pioneer Courthouse, 700 SW. Sixth Avenue, Portland, OR 97204. 

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Peter G. McCabe, Secretary, Rules Committee Support Office, Administrative Office of the United States Courts, Washington, DC 20544, telephone (202) 502-1820. 

Dated: December 21, 2010. 

Peter G. McCabe, 

Rules Committee Support Office. 

[FR Doc. 2010-32434 Filed 12-27-10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 2210-55-M
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Frederick K. Yeboah, Appellant. Philip Ross, as Industrial Commissioner, Respondent.

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed April 5, 1979, which found claimant disqualified from receiving benefits because he lost his employment through misconduct in connection therewith. Claimant worked for a china manufacturing company and sustained a back injury on August 15, 1978. He was on disability leave until November 1, 1978, the date on which the employer’s physician indicated he could return to work. Claimant was examined by his own physician on November 6, 1978 and received a note stating that he could resume his duties on November 13. The employer did not wish to wait that long and called claimant’s physician on November 7 to inquire whether claimant could perform light duty. A note indicating that claimant could perform light duty as of November 7 was obtained by the employer from claimant’s doctor. Claimant did not believe this change when informed of it by his employer and was advised to contact his doctor. Claimant was also warned that his failure to report for light duty might result in his termination since he had previously been warned about excessive absences. When he did not report to work until November 13, claimant was fired and ultimately denied benefits when the board found him guilty of misconduct. This appeal ensued. Initially, we note that the employ*730er’s reliance on a provision in the collective bargaining agreement with claimant’s union as a basis for his discharge is misplaced. That provision, which states that an employee loses all seniority rights if he "Is absent for three days without advising and giving satisfactory reasons therefor”, deals only with seniority rights and does not mandate claimant’s dismissal *(Matter of Love [Syracuse China Corp.—Ross],*54 AD2d 775). However, since claimant was warned that failure to report for light duty on November 7 might result in his discharge, the board could properly conclude that he lost his employment through misconduct when he did not return to work until November 13. Claimant’s contention that the November 7 note from his physician was a forgery and that he justifiably relied on the November 6 note excusing his absence until November 13 merely raised questions of credibility for resolution by the board. Accordingly, since there is substantial evidence in the record to support the finding that claimant lost his job through misconduct, the board’s determination denying benefits must be upheld. Decision affirmed, without costs. Mahoney, P. J., Greenblott, Sweeney, Main and Mikoll, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 244 (Tuesday, December 21, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 80069]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-31984]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[LLES956000-L14200000-BJ0000-LXSITRST0000]


Eastern States: Filing of Plat of Survey

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of Filing of Plat of Survey; Alabama.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) will file the plat of 
survey of the lands described below in the BLM-Eastern States office in 
Springfield, Virginia, 30 calendar days from the date of publication in 
the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bureau of Land Management-Eastern 
States, 7450 Boston Boulevard, Springfield, Virginia 22153. Attn: 
Cadastral Survey.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The survey was requested by the Bureau of 
Indian Affairs.
    The lands surveyed are:

St. Stephens Meridian, Alabama

T. 17 N., R. 19 E.

    The plat of survey represents the dependent resurvey of Parcel 
No. 17, land held in trust for the Poarch Band of the Creek Indians, 
in Township 17 North, Range 19 East, of the St. Stephens Meridian, 
in the State of Alabama, and was accepted September 28, 2010.

    We will place a copy of the plat we described in the open files. It 
will be available to the public as a matter of information.
    If BLM receives a protest against the survey, as shown on the plat, 
prior to the date of the official filing, we will stay the filing 
pending our consideration of the protest.
    We will not officially file the plat until the day after we have 
accepted or dismissed all protests and they have become final, 
including decisions on appeals.

     Dated: December 14, 2010.
Dominica Van Koten,
Chief Cadastral Surveyor.
[FR Doc. 2010-31984 Filed 12-20-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-GJ-P
IV 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 72

Urging the interim Government of Iraq ensure that the charges brought 

against Saddam Hussein include charges for the crimes his government 

committed against the people of Iran during the Iran-Iraq war from 

1980 to 1988. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 8, 2005

Mr. MEEHAN (for himself, Mr. WELDON of Pennsylvania, Mr. COX, Mr. 

SHIMKUS, Mr. SNYDER, and Mr. MCGOVERN) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on International Relations 

RESOLUTION

Urging the interim Government of Iraq ensure that the 

charges brought against Saddam Hussein include charges 

for the crimes his government committed against the 

people of Iran during the Iran-Iraq war from 1980 to 

1988.

Whereas former President of Iraq Saddam Hussein used 

chemical weapons against Iran during the Iran-Iraq war 

from 1980 to 1988; 

Whereas on July 1, 2004, the Iraqi Special Tribunal brought 

charges against Saddam Hussein for crimes committed 

by Hussein as President of Iraq, including crimes result-
2

•HRES 72 IH 

ing from the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait from 1990 to 

1991; 

Whereas none of the seven charges brought against Saddam 

Hussein by the Iraqi Special Tribunal refers to the 

crimes committed by Hussein against the people of Iran 

during the eight year Iran-Iraq War; 

Whereas an estimated 100,000 Iranians were affected by 

chemical weapons used by Saddam Hussein, 

Whereas many Americans of Iranian descent have been victims of the chemical weapons used by Saddam Hussein; 

Whereas the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) estimates 

that 20,000 Iranians were killed by chemical weapons 

used by Saddam Hussein while another 5,000 Iranians 

remain under medical care; 

Whereas the trial of Saddam Hussein will not be complete 

unless he is also forced to answer for the atrocities his 

government committed against the people of Iran; 

Whereas the United States stands with people living under 

oppressive regimes such as the Government of Iran in 

their quest for freedom and rule of law; and 

Whereas holding Saddam Hussein accountable for the crimes 

his government committed against humanity will further 

demonstrate the commitment of the United States to 

human rights: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives urges 

2 the interim Government of Iraq—

3 (1) to ensure that the charges brought against 

4 Saddam Hussein include charges for the crimes his 

5 government committed against the people of Iran 
3

•HRES 72 IH 

1 during the Iran-Iraq war from 1980 to 1988, includ2 ing the use of chemical weapons; and 

3 (2) to ensure a transparent, comprehensive, 

4 just, and fair trial against Saddam Hussein.

Æ