alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### VULCAN DETINNING CO. v. ASSMAN et al. (two cases).

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

December 11, *11171914.)

Actions by the Vulcan Detinning Company against Franz A. Assman and others.

No opinions. Motions denied, with $10 costs. Orders filed. See, also, 149 N. Y. Supp. 1117.
§ 708.31 Procedure for issuing an initial agency decision. ( a ) The Administrative Judge will serve the initial agency decision on all parties.
( b ) An initial agency decision issued by the Administrative Judge will contain appropriate findings, conclusions, an order, and the factual basis for each finding, whether or not a hearing has been held on the complaint. In making such findings, the Administrative Judge may rely upon, but is not bound by, the report of investigation.
( c ) If the Administrative Judge determines that an act of retaliation has occurred, the initial agency decision will include an order for any form of relief permitted under § 708.36. If the Administrative Judge does not determine that an act of retaliation has occurred, the initial agency decision will state that the complaint is denied.
`[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 488 Reported in House (RH)]







                                                 House Calendar No. 110
109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 488

                          [Report No. 109-269]

Requesting that the President transmit to the House of Representatives 
  information in his possession relating to contracts for services or 
          construction related to Hurricane Katrina recovery.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 7, 2005

Mr. LaTourette (for himself, Mr. LoBiondo, and Mr. McCotter) submitted 
   the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 
                   Transportation and Infrastructure

                            November 3, 2005

      Additional sponsors: Mr. Simmons and Mr. Johnson of Illinois

                            November 3, 2005

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION


 
Requesting that the President transmit to the House of Representatives 
  information in his possession relating to contracts for services or 
          construction related to Hurricane Katrina recovery.

    Resolved, That the House of Representatives requests that the 
President transmit to the House of Representatives, not later than 14 
days after the date of the adoption of this resolution, copies of any 
portions of any contracts in his possession for services or building or 
other construction (including pre-awarded contracts or contracts that 
were modified or extended) related to Hurricane Katrina recovery or 
rebuilding in the geographic areas specified in the President's 
Proclamation 7924 of September 8, 2005, that were awarded by the 
Federal Emergency Management Agency (or any other agency) pursuant to 
the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 
U.S.C. 5121 et seq.), and any communications in his possession made or 
received, on or after August 26, 2005, by such agency relating to such 
contracts.
                                                 House Calendar No. 110

109th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                              H. RES. 488

                          [Report No. 109-269]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

Requesting that the President transmit to the House of Representatives 
  information in his possession relating to contracts for services or 
          construction related to Hurricane Katrina recovery.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            November 3, 2005

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed`
#### In the Matter of Clifton L. Rider, Petitioner, v Board of Trustees of the Village of Rockville Centre, Respondent.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent board of trustees, dated August 15,1978 and made after a hearing, which found petitioner guilty of reckless handling of firearms and dismissed him from his position as a police *857officer. Petition granted to the extent that the determination is modified, on the law, by adding thereto a provision that petitioner is entitled to back pay for the period beginning 30 days after his suspension and ending on the date of his dismissal from service, less any moneys received during that period as provided in subdivision 3 of section 75 of the Civil Service Law. As so modified, determination confirmed and proceeding otherwise dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements. On the record before us, we hold that there was substantial evidence to support the finding that petitioner was guilty of the charges preferred against him (see *300 Gramatan Ave. Assoc. v State Div. of Human Rights,*45 NY2d 176). Furthermore, the penalty imposed (termination of employment) was not so disproportionate to the offense as to be shocking to one’s sense of fairness (see *Matter of Pell v Board of*Educ., 34 NY2d 222). Under such circumstances, we are compelled to confirm these determinations. Notwithstanding his dismissal, petitioner is entitled to back pay for the period of his suspension in excess of 30 days, less any moneys received during that period as provided in subdivision 3 of section 75 of the Civil Service Law (see *Matter of Amkraut v Hults,*21 AD2d 260; *Matter of Coping v New York City Tr. Auth.,*57 AD2d 621). Lazer, J. P., Mangano, Gibbons and Cohalan, JJ., concur.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 244 (Tuesday, December 21, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 80082]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-32150]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS ADMINISTRATION

Information Security Oversight Office


State, Local, Tribal, And Private Sector Policy Advisory 
Committee (SLTPS-PAC)

AGENCY: Information Security Oversight Office, National Archives and 
Records Administration.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. Appendix 2) and implementing regulation 41 CFR 101-6, 
the Information Security Oversight Office (ISOO) announces the 
inaugural meeting of the State, Local, Tribal, and Private Sector 
Policy Advisory Committee (SLTPS-PAC). The SLTPS-PAC will advise the 
President, the Secretary of Homeland Security, the Director of the 
Information Security Oversight Office (ISOO), and other executive 
branch officials on all matters concerning the policies relating to 
access to and safeguarding of classified national security information 
by U.S. State, Local, Tribal, and Private Sector Entities, as specified 
in Executive Order 13549 and its implementing directive.

DATES: The meeting will be held on Tuesday, January 11, 2011 from 1 
p.m. to 3 p.m.

ADDRESSES: National Archives and Records Administration, 700 
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Jefferson Room, Washington, DC 20408.

SUPPEMENTARY INFORMATION: This meeting will be open to the public. 
However, due to space limitations and access procedures, the name and 
telephone number of individuals planning to attend must be submitted to 
the Information Security Oversight Office no later than Thursday, 
January 6, 2011. ISOO will provide additional instructions for gaining 
access to the location of the meeting.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert J. Skwirot, Senior Program 
Analyst, ISOO, National Archives Building, 700 Pennsylvania Avenue, 
NW., Washington, DC 20408, telephone number (202) 357-5398, or at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#99ebf6fbfcebedb7eaf2eef0ebf6edd9f7f8ebf8b7fef6ef"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="7b0914191e090f5508100c1209140f3b151a091a551c140d">[email protected]</span></a>. Contact ISOO at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#773e243838371916051659101801"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b1f8e2fefef1dfd0c3d09fd6dec7">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: December 16, 2010.
Mary Ann Hadyka,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010-32150 Filed 12-20-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7515-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
§ 603.540 Acceptability of fully depreciated real property or equipment. The contracting officer should limit the value of any contribution of a fully depreciated asset to a reasonable use charge. In determining what is reasonable, the contracting officer must consider: ( a ) The original cost of the asset;
( b ) Its estimated remaining useful life at the time of the negotiations;
( c ) The effect of any increased maintenance charges or decreased performance due to age; and
( d ) The amount of depreciation that the participant previously charged to Federal awards.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION

CALVIN FLUKER, et al., )

)

Plaintiffs, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

v. ) 2:06cv785-MHT

) 

U.S. FOODSERVICE, INC., )

and U.S. FOODSERVICE, )

INC.- Montgomery Division, )

)

Defendants. )

ORDER

It is ORDERED as follows:

(1) The motion to extend (Doc. No. 33) is granted to

the extent set forth in this order only.

(2) The uniform scheduling order (Doc. No. 16) is

modified in the following respects:

(A) The pretrial is reset for May 19, 2008, and

the trial is reset for term of court beginning on June

23, 2008, with all deadlines expressly tied to these two

dates adjusted accordingly.

Case 2:06-cv-00785-MHT-WC Document 34 Filed 06/11/2007 Page 1 of 2
(B) The deadline for completing discovery is

extended to January 18, 2008.

(C) The deadlines for expert reports are

extended to August 22, 2007, for plaintiffs and September

26, 2007, for defendants.

(D) All other deadlines are unchanged.

DONE, this the 11th day of June, 2007.

 /s/ Myron H. Thompson 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00785-MHT-WC Document 34 Filed 06/11/2007 Page 2 of 2
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Richard Marx, Appellant, v. J. Edwin La Vallee, as Warden of Clinton Prison, Respondent.

Greenblott, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court at Special Term, entered May 13,1969 in Clinton County, which dismissed a writ of habeas corpus after a hearing. Appellant was convicted following trial of the crime of murder in the first degree in Queens County on June 27, 1957, and was thereafter sentenced to a term of life imprisonment. He contends that his conviction was invalid, alleging (1) that the prosecution was permitted to orally amend the indictment in its opening statement to the jury, and (2) the trial court committed further error when it included in its charge the crime of felony murder when the indictment, as returned, alleged premeditated murder. Respondent’s contention that one indicted for premeditated murder, first degree, under former subdivision 1 of section 1044 of the Penal Law, could lawfully be convicted of felony murder under subdivision 2 of that section, is well-founded. It is established case law that an indictment in common-law form, stating facts constituting murder in the first degree, is sufficient to sustain a conviction if the proof is within any of the statutory definitions of the crime. (See *People*v. *Donaldson,*295 N. Y. 158; *People*v. *Sullivan,*173 N. Y. 122; *People*v. *Giblin,*115 N. Y. 196; and *People*v. *Snelling,*33 Mise 2d 735.) Judgment affirmed, without costs. Herlihy, P. J., Reynolds, Greenblott, Cooke and Sweeney, JJ., concur in memorandum by Greenblott, J.
<PAGE>

                                                                     Exhibit 4.5

                           AGREEMENT TO AMEND WARRANT

     This Agreement is dated as of July 17, 2006, by and between SF Capital
Partners, Ltd. ("SF Capital") and Alfacell Corporation (the "Company").

     The undersigned hereby agree as follows:

     1. In connection with the Securities Purchase Agreement (the "Purchase
Agreement") dated as of the date hereof by and among the Company and the
purchasers of securities (the "Purchasers") that are a party thereto (including
affiliates of SF Capital), the Company and SF Capital have agreed to amend the
terms of a warrant to purchase 189,585 shares of the Company's common stock held
by SF Capital (the "Original Warrant").

     2. The Original Warrant shall be amended to reflect the following:

          -    The exercise price per share of Company common stock will be
               reduced to $2.88 per share.

          -    The Warrant will not be exercisable until six months from the
               Closing Date (as defined in the Purchase Agreement).

          Otherwise, the terms of the Original Warrant shall remain the same.

     3. On the Closing Date, The Company will issue a new warrant to SF Capital
to reflect the amended terms (the "Amended Warrant"). SF Capital shall return
the Original Warrant to the Company as soon as practicable and upon receipt, it
will be cancelled and destroyed. In the event SF Capital does not return the
Original Warrant to the Company, it shall be deemed cancelled; and, provided
further, that whether or not the Original Warrant is returned, the books and
records of the Company shall be updated to reflect the cancellation of the
Original Warrant and the issuance of the Amended Warrant.

     4. SF Capital acknowledges that the terms of the Purchase Agreement and
this Agreement will be disclosed on a Form 8-K to be filed by the Company (the
"8-K"). SF Capital consents to the disclosure of such terms, including the
identification of SF Capital as a Purchaser in the 8-K.

<PAGE>

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of
the day and year first above written.

                                        SF CAPITAL PARTNERS, LTD.


                                        By:
                                            ------------------------------------
                                        Name:
                                              ----------------------------------
                                        Its:
                                             -----------------------------------


AGREED AND ACCEPTED:

ALFACELL CORPORATION


By: /s/ Kuslima Shogen
    ---------------------------------
Name: Kuslima Shogen
Its: Chief Executive Officer


                                        2
§ 603.665 Periodic audits of nonprofit participants. An expenditure-based TIA is an assistance instrument subject to the Single Audit Act (31 U.S.C. 7501-7507), so nonprofit participants are subject to the requirements under that Act and OMB Circular A-133. Specifically, the requirements are those in: ( a ) 10 CFR 600.226 for State and local governments; and
( b ) 10 CFR 600.126 for other nonprofit organizations.
EX-10.2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF EBANK FINANCIAL SVCS



 





EXHIBIT 10.2




GUARANTOR’S ACKNOWLEDGMENT




     The undersigned (the “Guarantor”) has guaranteed payment and performance of obligations of
EBANK MORTGAGE, LLC (the “Borrower”) to U.S. Bank National Association (the “Bank”) pursuant to the
terms of a Guaranty, dated as of April 19, 2006 (the “Guaranty”), which obligations include without
limitation obligations under the Warehousing Credit Agreement, dated as of [agreement date] between
the Borrower and the Bank (as amended, the “Credit Agreement”). The Guarantor acknowledges that
the Guarantor has received a copy of the proposed First Amendment to the Credit Agreement, to be
dated on or about July 21, 2006 (the “Amendment”). The Guarantor agrees and acknowledges that the
Amendment shall in no way impair or limit the right of the Bank under the Guaranty, and confirms
that by the Guaranty, the Guarantor continues to guaranty payment and performance of the
obligations of the Borrower to the Bank, including without limitation obligations under the Credit
Agreement as amended pursuant to the Amendment. The Guarantor hereby confirms that the Guaranty
remains in full force and effect, enforceable against the Guarantor in accordance with its terms.



Dated as of July 21, 2006




	 	 	 	 	 
	 	EBANK FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/  James L. Box
 	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	Title:  	President and CEO
2007-1925.

#### State ex rel. Newell v. Jackson.

Jackson App. No. 06CA20.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 228 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                           May 3, 2005.
Whereas the Vietnamese who resettled in the United States after the events of 
        April 1975 have, through perseverance and hard work, been able to 
        rebuild their lives and form a vibrant community across the United 
        States, nearly a million and a half strong, which contributes in many 
        significant ways to the richness and diversity of American society;
Whereas the large flow of refugees to the United States and elsewhere was caused 
        by the fall of the Republic of Vietnam to the Communist forces of North 
        Vietnam in April 1975, resulting in a world refugee crisis of historic 
        proportions, the exodus of millions of Vietnamese, and hundreds of 
        thousands of deaths at sea;
Whereas since 1975, Vietnamese Americans have worked tirelessly to promote 
        freedom and democracy in Vietnam;
Whereas the United States honors all members of the United States Armed Forces 
        and members of the South Vietnamese forces who fought in the Vietnam 
        conflict, including those individuals who gave the ultimate sacrifice, 
        their lives, for the cause of freedom during such conflict; and
Whereas the interests of the United States with respect to the Socialist 
        Republic of Vietnam will be best served when the Vietnamese people fully 
        enjoy the exercise of their basic human rights regardless of politics, 
        religion, gender, or ethnic origin: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) honors the significant contributions of Vietnamese Americans to 
        the richness, diversity, and success of American society;
            (2) observes the 30th anniversary of the large exodus of refugees 
        from Vietnam when the Republic of Vietnam fell to the Communist forces 
        of North Vietnam;
            (3) supports all individuals taking part in events in Washington, 
        D.C. and across the United States to commemorate these momentous events 
        in world history;
            (4) honors the memory of those Vietnamese who lost their lives in 
        that refugee exodus; and
            (5) urges all citizens of the United States to share in remembering 
        these events and working toward the full realization of freedom, 
        democracy, and equality for all the people of Vietnam.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
PGI 206.000 Scope of part.       For information on various approaches that may be used to competitively fulfill DoD requirements, see the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment Guidelines for Creating and Maintaining a Competitive Environment for Supplies and Services in the Department of Defense.    **Parent topic:** PGI Part 206 - COMPETITION REQUIREMENTS
PGI 237.270 Acquisition of audit services.

The following DoD publications govern the conduct of audits:

(1) DoDI 7600.2, Audit Policies - Provides DoD audit policies.

(2) DoDI 7600.6, Audit of Nonappropriated Fund Instrumentalities and Related Activities - Provides

guidance to audit organizations for audits of nonappropriated fund organizations.

(3) DoD 7600.7-M, DoD Audit Manual - Provides policy and guidance to DoD audit organizations for

the monitoring of audit services provided by non-Federal auditors.

Parent topic: PGI 237.2 -ADVISORYAND ASSISTANCE SERVICES
#### § 52.147 Duration of design approval.

A standard design approval issued under this subpart is valid for 15 years from the date of issuance and may not be renewed. A design approval continues to be valid beyond the date of expiration in any proceeding on an application for a construction permit or an operating license under part 50 or a combined license or manufacturing license under part 52 that references the final design approval and is docketed before the date of expiration of the design approval.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

June 25, 2012

h0618

Order 

June 25, 2012

144043(43)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 144043

COA: 298400

Muskegon CC: 09-057501-FC

BERNARD JAMES MOORE,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s March 5, 

2012 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was 

entered erroneously.
IV 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 722 

Supporting the goals and ideals of ‘‘Black Women’s Heart Health Awareness 

Week’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 2, 2018 

Mr. RUSH submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Supporting the goals and ideals of ‘‘Black Women’s Heart 

Health Awareness Week’’. 

Whereas heart disease and stroke are the number one killers 

of women, and stroke disproportionately affects AfricanAmerican women; 

Whereas African-American women are less likely than Caucasian women to be aware that heart disease is the leading 

cause of death; 

Whereas cardiovascular diseases kill nearly 50,000 AfricanAmerican women annually; 

Whereas of African-American women ages 20 and older, 49 

percent have heart disease; 

Whereas only 1 in 5 African-American women believes she is 

personally at risk; 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 722 IH 

Whereas only 52 percent of African-American women are 

aware of the signs and symptoms of a heart attack; 

Whereas only 36 percent of African-American women know 

that heart disease is their greatest health risk; 

Whereas more than 40 percent of non-Hispanic African 

Americans have high blood pressure, which is more severe 

in Blacks than Caucasians, and develops earlier in life; 

Whereas African Americans are disproportionately affected 

by obesity; 

Whereas among non-Hispanic African Americans age 20 and 

older, 63 percent of men and 77 percent of women are 

overweight or obese; 

Whereas African Americans are more likely to have diabetes 

than non-Hispanic Caucasians; and 

Whereas the week of February 12, 2018, would be an appropriate week to designate as ‘‘Black Women’s Heart 

Health Awareness Week’’: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives supports 

2 the goals and ideals of ‘‘Black Women’s Heart Health 

3 Awareness Week’’. 

Æ 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS