alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 75.9 Information collection requirements: OMB approval. ( a ) The Nuclear Regulatory Commission, or another U.S. Government agency, has submitted the information collection requirements contained in this Part to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for approval as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 *et seq.*). The NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. OMB has approved the information collection requirements contained in this Part under control number 3150-0055.
( b ) The approved information collection requirements contained in this Part appear in §§ 75.3, 75.6, 75.7a, 75.10, 75.11, 75.12, 75.21, 75.22, 75.23, 75.24, 75.31, 75.32, 75.33, 75.34, 75.35, 75.36, 75.43, 75.44, and 75.45.
( c ) This part contains information collection requirements in addition to those approved under the control number specified in paragraph (a) of this section. These information collection requirements and the control numbers under which they are approved are as follows: ( 1 ) In § 75.10, Design Information Questionnaire forms are approved under control number 3150-0056.
( 2 ) In §§ 75.31, 75.32, 75.33, and 75.35, DOE/NRC Form 742 is approved under control number 3150-0004.
( 3 ) In §§ 75.33 and 75.34, DOE/NRC Form 741 is approved under control number 3150-0003.
( 4 ) In §§ 75.34 and 75.35, DOE/NRC Form 740M is approved under OMB control number 3150-0057.
( 5 ) In § 75.35, DOE/NRC Form 742C is approved under control number 3150-0058.
( 6 ) In §§ 75.10 and 75.11, DOC/NRC Forms AP-1, AP-A, and associated forms are approved under control number 0694-0135.
[49 FR 19628, May 9, 1984, as amended at 62 FR 52189, Oct. 6, 1997; 67 FR 67101, Nov. 4, 2002; 73 FR 78610, Dec. 23, 2008; 83 FR 19611, May 4, 2018; 85 FR 65664, Oct. 16, 2020]
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 15

- 00343

- CR

Phillip Jackson v. The State of Texas

On Appeal from the 105th District Court of Nueces County , Texas Trial Cause No. 00

- CR

- 2318

- D

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this caus e on appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed. The Court orders the appeal
DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion

. We further order this decision certified below for observance.

October 1, 2015
#### In re BEALS’ ESTATE.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

February 19, 1915.)

In the matter of the appraisal of the estate of William R. Beals, deceased, under the act relating to taxable transfers of property.

No opinion. • Order of the Surrogate’s Court of Orange County affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 971 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to treat small businesses, owned 

by surviving spouses of members of the Armed Forces killed in the 

line of duty, as small business concerns owned and controlled by veterans 

for purposes of contracting goals and preferences of the Department 

of Veterans Affairs, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 7, 2017 

Ms. MENG introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to treat small businesses, owned by surviving spouses of members of the 

Armed Forces killed in the line of duty, as small business 

concerns owned and controlled by veterans for purposes 

of contracting goals and preferences of the Department 

of Veterans Affairs, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Surviving Spouse Con5 tracting Preference Act’’. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 971 IH

1 SEC. 2. TREATMENT OF BUSINESSES OWNED BY SURVIVING 

2 SPOUSES OF MEMBERS OF THE ARMED 

3 FORCES FOR PURPOSES OF DEPARTMENT OF 

4 VETERANS AFFAIRS CONTRACTING GOALS 

5 AND PREFERENCES. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 8127 of title 38, United 

7 States Code, is amended— 

8 (1) by redesignating subsections (h) through (k) 

9 as subsections (i) through (l), respectively; and 

10 (2) by inserting after subsection (g) the fol11 lowing new subsection (h): 

12 ‘‘(h) TREATMENT OF BUSINESSES AFTER DEATH OF

13 MEMBER.—(1) If a member of the Armed Forces is killed 

14 in the line of duty in the active military, naval, or air serv15 ice, the surviving spouse of such member who acquires 

16 ownership rights in a small business concern shall, for the 

17 period described in paragraph (2), be treated as the sur18 viving spouse of a service-disabled veteran described in 

19 section 3(q)(2)(C)(i) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 

20 632(q)(2)(C)(i)). 

21 ‘‘(2) The period referred to in paragraph (1) is the 

22 period beginning on the date on which the member of the 

23 Armed Forces dies and ending on the earliest of the fol24 lowing dates: 

25 ‘‘(A) The date on which the surviving spouse of 

26 the member remarries. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 971 IH

1 ‘‘(B) The date on which the surviving spouse 

2 relinquishes such ownership interest in the small 

3 business concern.’’. 

4 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—Subsection (h) of section 

5 8127 of such title, as added by subsection (a), shall take 

6 effect on the date of the enactment of this Act and shall 

7 apply with respect to the deaths of members of the Armed 

8 Forces occurring on or after such date. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
| (logo)usbank  | All  of **us** serving you |
|--------------------|----------------------------|
|               |                       |

**AnnualStatement of Compliance**

**MorganStanley Bank of America Merrill Lynch Trust 2013-C7**

 

*VIA: EMAIL*

 

Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc.

1585 Broadway

New York, New York 10036

Attention: Stephen Holmes

stephen.holmes@morganstanley.com

 

 

Re:         The Poolingand Servicing Agreement (the "Agreement") dated as of January 1, 2013among Morgan Stanley Capital I, Inc. as depositor, Midland Loan Services, aDivision of PNC Bank, National Association, as master servicer and specialservicer, Situs Holdings, LLC, as trust advisor, Wells Fargo Bank, NationalAssociation, as custodian and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee,certificate administrator, certificate registrar and authenticating agent

 

I,Kimberly O. Jacobs, a Senior Vice President of U.S. Bank National Association,as Certificate Administrator, as a certifying servicer hereby certify that:

 

(1)A review of the activities of the Certificate Administrator during the precedingcalendar year (the “Reporting Period”) and of the performance of theCertificate Administrator under the Agreement has been made under mysupervision; and

 

(2)To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the CertificateAdministrator has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement in allmaterial respects throughout such Reporting Period 

 

Capitalizedterms used but not defined herein have the meanings set forth in the Agreement.

 

 

Date:March 1, 2018

 

 

U.S.Bank National Association as Certificate Administrator 

 

 

By:/s/ Kimberly O. Jacobs

KimberlyO. Jacobs

SeniorVice President
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sionix Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, James
J. Houtz, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ James J. Houtz
-----------------------------------
    James J. Houtz, President

May 20, 2004
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of BNP Residential Properties, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Pamela
B. Bruno, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.







  /s/ Pamela B. Bruno

Pamela B. Bruno
Vice President, Treasurer and
Chief Financial Officer


August 5, 2005


                                       44
<PAGE>
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A24A1109. ANGEL DAVIS v. L & J AUTO SALES & LEASING, LLC. 

After the magistrate court entered judgment for plaintiff Angel Davis,

defendant L & J Auto Sales & Leasing, LLC (“L & J”) appealed to the State Court of

Dougherty County. That court entered judgment in favor of L & J for $354.00, plus

costs and post-judgment interest. Davis then filed this direct appeal. We, however,

lack jurisdiction. 

Pretermitting the issue of the judgment amount, see OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (6), an

appeal from a state court order disposing of a de novo appeal from a magistrate court

decision must be initiated by filing an application for discretionary appeal. OCGA §

5-6-35 (a) (11); Strachan v. Meritor Mtg. Corp. East, 216 Ga. App. 82, 82 (453 SE2d

119) (1995).“Compliance with the discretionary appeals procedure is jurisdictional.”

Smoak v. Dept. of Human Resources, 221 Ga. App. 257, 257 (471 SE2d 60) (1996).

Thus,Davis’failure to file a discretionary application deprives usof jurisdiction

over this appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED. 

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office,Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

April 15, 2024

04/15/2024
8. APPROVALS, ACCEPTANCE, AND OWNERSHIP

8.1 Final designs must be approved by the owner before material ordering.Material ordering and fabrication prior to approval of the owner will be at the manufacturer's risk. Award of the contract to themanufacturer does not constitute acceptance of design calculations submittedwith the bid. If corrections are required in the final pole designs due tomanufacturer's errors, omissions, or misinterpretations of the specifications,the quoted price shall not change. Approval of the drawings and calculations bythe owner does not relieve the manufacturer of responsibility for the adequacyof the design, correctness of dimensions, details on the drawings, or the properfit of parts.

8.2 Upon delivery, poles shall be free of defects and blemishes whichwould have a detrimental effect on the structure capacity and/or longevity ofthe pole. They also shall be smooth, attractive, unscarred and in new condition.Poles not meeting these requirements shall be repaired or replaced by themanufacturer at no additional cost to the owner.

8.3 Poles failing to meet strength requirements, poles withcircumferential or longitudinal cracks, poles failing to meet manufacturingtolerances or cover requirements, poles with exposed steel, poles with cavitiesthat absorb water, and spliced poles that do not fit together properly or aredistorted after mating shall be rejected by the owner and replaced by themanufacturer at no cost to the owner.

8.4 If the delivered weight of a pole will exceed the calculated weightby 5 percent, the manufacturer shall notify the owner of the actual weightbefore pole delivery. Any pole whose delivered weight exceeds or is below 10 percent of its calculated weight may berejected by the owner.

8.5 All final drawings shall become the property of the owner, who shallhave full rights to reproduce and use them, but shall not share them with otherconcrete pole suppliers.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 500 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 500

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                     November 17, 2005.
Whereas on December 5, 1945, the 5 Avenger torpedo bombers of Flight 19, 
        originating at the Naval Air Station of Fort Lauderdale, Florida, and 
        its crew of 14 Navy airmen, disappeared;
Whereas the Mariner rescue aircraft sent to search for Flight 19, originating at 
        the Naval Air Station of Banana River, Florida, and its crew of 13 Navy 
        airmen, also disappeared on that date;
Whereas December 5, 2005, marks the 60th anniversary of the disappearance of 
        Flight 19;
Whereas the loss of Flight 19 occurred during peacetime;
Whereas the disappearance of Flight 19 sparked one of the largest air and sea 
        rescue searches in history covering over 200,000 square miles;
Whereas all investigations of the disappearance of Flight 19 have failed to 
        recover any aircraft, debris, or remains;
Whereas there remain unanswered questions concerning the disappearance of Flight 
        19; and
Whereas there are continuing efforts with the latest technology to determine the 
        location of the lost aircraft and crews: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) recognizes the 60th anniversary of the disappearance of the 5 
        naval Avenger torpedo bombers of Flight 19 and the naval Mariner rescue 
        aircraft sent to search for Flight 19;
            (2) honors the memory of the 27 Navy airmen lost in these 
        disappearances;
            (3) recognizes the historical significance of Flight 19;
            (4) acknowledges continuing efforts to determine what caused these 
        disappearances; and
            (5) commends the Naval Historical Center for preserving the history 
        of Flight 19.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
§ 708.5 Protected conduct. An employee of a contractor may file a complaint against his employer alleging that he has been subject to retaliation for: ( a ) Disclosing to a DOE official, a member of Congress, any other government official who has responsibility for the oversight of the conduct of operations at a DOE site, the employer, or any higher tier contractor, information that he reasonably believes reveals— ( 1 ) A substantial violation of a law, rule, or regulation;
( 2 ) A substantial and specific danger to employees or to public health or safety; or
( 3 ) Fraud, gross mismanagement, gross waste of funds, or abuse of authority; or
( b ) Participating in a Congressional proceeding or an administrative proceeding conducted under this part; or
( c ) Subject to § 708.7 of this subpart, refusing to participate in an activity, policy, or practice if the employee believed participation would— ( 1 ) Constitute a violation of a Federal health or safety law; or
( 2 ) Cause the employee to have a reasonable fear of serious injury to himself, other employees, or members of the public.
March 16, 2010 

Esta Rosenberg 

Chief, U.S. Carrier Licensing 

Division 

Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave., S.E. 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

Re: American 	Airlines, Additional U.S.-Argentina 

es DOT-OST-2010­

Dear Ms. Rosenberg: 

American Airlines, Inc. has completed its poll of the 

carrier parties served with our application of March 16, 2010 

(docket number not yet assigned). We are seeking allocation of 

four additional U.S.-Argentina weekly combination frequencies 

for peak season service in the Miami-Buenos Aires market in July 

and August 2010. 

We have received non-objections from each of the 

carrier parties we served. Accordingly, we request expedited 

approval. 

Respectfully submitted, 

Associate General Counsel 

American Airlines, Inc. 

1101 17th Street, N.W., Suite 

Washington, D.C. 20036 

(202) 496-5647 

carl.nelson@aa.com 

600 

cc: Docket Branch 

Service list 
I hereby certify that I have this day served the 

foregoing document by email on the following persons: 

hkamen@coair.com 

sascha.vande llen@delta.com 

jeffrey.manley@united.com 

gbleopard@fedex.com 

dvaughan@kelleydrye.com 

kevin.montgomery@polaraircargo.com 

rpommer@atlasair.com 

rsilverberg@sgbdc.com 

March 16, 2010
IV 

House Calendar No. 80 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 400 

[Report No. 109–213] 

Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to 

consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on Rules. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 29 (legislative day, JULY 28), 2005 

Mrs. CAPITO, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; 

which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

RESOLUTION 

Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with 

respect to consideration of certain resolutions reported 

from the Committee on Rules. 

1 Resolved, That the requirement of clause 6(a) of rule 

2 XIII for a two-thirds vote to consider a report from the 

3 Committee on Rules on the same day it is presented to 

4 the House is waived with respect to any resolution re5 ported on the legislative day of July 29, 2005, providing 

6 for consideration or disposition of any measure related to 

7 funding for transportation programs. 
House Calendar No. 80 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 400 

[Report No. 109–213] 

RESOLUTION 

Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII 

tions reported from the Committee on Rules. with respect to consideration of certain resoluJULY 29 (legislative day, JULY 28), 2005 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 729 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 729

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                          June 6, 2006.
Whereas travel and tourism has a major impact on the economy of the United 
        States as the 3rd largest retail sales industry in the Nation;
Whereas 1 out of every 7 people employed in the United States civilian labor 
        force is directly or indirectly employed in the travel and tourism 
        industry;
Whereas international travel to the United States is the largest service export, 
        having generated a trade surplus for 16 consecutive years, increasing 
        144 percent between 2003 to 2004 to over $4 billion;
Whereas, in 2005, travel and tourism-related expenditures reached $1 trillion, 
        including $596 billion in direct sales and $445 billion in indirect 
        sales, and supported 8 million jobs;
Whereas the Department of Commerce has released the 2004 international year-end 
        arrivals data, revealing that the level of international travel to the 
        United States increased by 12 percent from 2003 to 46 million in 2004, 
        with overseas visitors increasing 13 percent, to 20 million in 2004;
Whereas domestic and international traveler spending in the United States 
        generated $99.4 billion in taxes for Federal, State and local 
        governments in 2004;
Whereas tourism contributes substantially to personal growth, education, 
        appreciation of cross-cultural differences, and the enhancement of 
        international understanding and good will;
Whereas the abundant natural and man-made attractions of the United States and 
        the hospitality of the American people establish the United States as 
        the preeminent destination for both foreign and domestic travelers;
Whereas National Tourism Week was established by Congress in 1983, and first 
        celebrated in May 1984, when President Ronald Reagan signed a 
        proclamation urging citizens to observe the week with appropriate 
        ceremonies and activities;
Whereas, since 1984, National Tourism Week has been celebrated each May by the 
        travel and tourism community, travel industry associations, as well as 
        many States, cities, and localities throughout the Nation; and
Whereas May 13 through 21, 2006, is the 23rd annual National Tourism Week: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) supports National Tourism Week; and
            (2) requests that the President issue a proclamation calling upon 
        the people of the United States and interested groups to observe 
        National Tourism Week with appropriate ceremonies and activities.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```