alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
To: U.S. Department of Energy

Date: October 2, 2013

Re: Ex parte meeting on Grid-enabled water heaters, September 26, 2013.

On September 26, 2013 a number of stakeholders met with DOE representatives regarding water heater 

standards and thermal storage and demand response programs.

The following individuals were in the meeting:

Jay Morrison, National Rural Electric Cooperative Association

Keith Dennis, National Rural Electric Cooperative Association

Julie Barkemeyer, National Rural Electric Cooperative Association

Brian Cavey, National Rural Electric Cooperative Association (on phone)

Harvey Sachs, American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy

Lowell Ungar, American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy

Robin Roy, Natural Resources Defense Council

Craig Glazer, PJM Interconnection

Steve Rosenstock, Edison Electric Institute

Alex Hofmann, American Public Power Association

Charlie Adams, A. O. Smith Corporation (on phone)

Josh Greene, representing A. O. Smith Corporation (on phone)

Karen Meyers, Rheem Manufacturing Company (on phone)

Paul Steffes, Steffes Corporation (on phone)

John Cymbalsky, DOE

Dan Cohen, DOE

Ari Altman, DOE

Mr. Jay Morrison presented DOE with a copy of recent draft legislative language agreed to by the 

stakeholders in the meeting. This draft amendment to S.1392 gives as its purpose, “To modify the 

efficiency standards for grid-enabled water heaters.” It would allow restricted sales of resistance water 

heaters larger than 75 gallons after April 16, 2015 for use in thermal storage and demand response 

programs with specified conditions and reporting requirements, and with episodic reviews of the 

program by the Secretary of Energy. The stakeholders presented it to DOE staff for their information, to 

clarify the intent of the legislative proposal, and so that the parties and DOE staff could discuss whether 

the ideas within the language could potentially be incorporated in the regulatory proposal pending in 

docket no. EERE-2012-BT-STD-0022.

Mr. Morrison noted that the group did not have full consensus on any specific regulatory alternative, 

but that the issue is important enough to warrant early consideration. He expressed hope that DOE 

would be able to find an alternative regulatory approach to achieving the same ends as the legislation.

The draft amendment is attached.
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-15-00259-CV

IN RE BRENDA COLLINS AND DENNIS EUGENE COLLINS

Original Proceeding

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relators’ Petition for Writ of Mandamus filed on July 23, 2015, is denied.

TOM GRAY

Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Petition denied

Opinion delivered and filed July 30, 2015

OT06
§ 719.7 Is there a procedure for exceptions or deviations from this part? ( a ) Requests for exceptions or deviations from this part must be made in writing to Department Counsel and approved by the General Counsel. If an alternate procedure is proposed for compliance with an individual requirement in this part, that procedure must be included in the written request by the contractor. The General Counsel or his/her delegee shall provide a written response to such requests; however the response shall not require a justification of the Department's exercise of its discretion.
( b ) The General Counsel may authorize exceptions or deviations requested under paragraph (a) of this section. The General Counsel may also establish exceptions to this part based on current field office and contractor practices that satisfy the purpose of these requirements.
( c ) Exceptions to this part that are also a deviation from the Department of Energy Acquisition Regulation (DEAR) cost principles (see subpart D of this part) must be approved in accordance with applicable DOE procurement policy. See, e.g., DOE Acquisition Guide chapter 1.1, requiring approval by the Senior Procurement Executive of DOE or NNSA as applicable. In any event, the written request from a contractor for a deviation from a cost principle relating to this part must be submitted to the contracting officer, with a copy provided to Department Counsel.
# 801.604 Contracting Officer`s Representative (COR).

When the contracting officer intends to designate a Contracting Officer's Representative for a solicitation or contract, the contracting officer must include the clause in 852. 201-70, Contracting Officer`s Representative, in the solicitation and contract.     

**Parent topic:**Subpart 801.6 - Career Development, Contracting Authority, and Responsibilities
IV 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 160 

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to establish a Permanent 

Select Committee on Aging. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 1, 2017 

Mr. CICILLINE (for himself, Ms. SCHAKOWSKY, Ms. MATSUI, Mr. CARTWRIGHT, Mr. BRENDAN F. BOYLE of Pennsylvania, Ms. WASSERMAN

SCHULTZ, Ms. LOFGREN, Mr. POCAN, Mr. GRIJALVA, Ms. SHEA-PORTER, 

Mr. LANGEVIN, Ms. ROYBAL-ALLARD, Ms. MICHELLE LUJAN GRISHAM

of New Mexico, Ms. BONAMICI, Ms. PINGREE, Ms. KAPTUR, Mr. CONNOLLY, Mr. MCNERNEY, Mrs. CAROLYN B. MALONEY of New York, Ms. 

FUDGE, Mr. COHEN, Mr. GARAMENDI, Mr. DEUTCH, Ms. TITUS, and Ms. 

SLAUGHTER) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 

the Committee on Rules 

RESOLUTION 

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to 

establish a Permanent Select Committee on Aging. 

1 Resolved, That rule X of the Rules of the House of 

2 Representatives is amended by adding at the end the fol3 lowing new clause: 

4 ‘‘Permanent Select Committee on Aging 

5 ‘‘12. There is established a Permanent Select Com6 mittee on Aging which shall not have legislative jurisdic7 tion but which shall have jurisdiction— 


rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 160 IH 

1 ‘‘(1) to conduct a continuing comprehensive 

2 study and review of the problems of the older Amer3 ican, including but not limited to income mainte4 nance, poverty, housing, health (including medical 

5 research), welfare, employment, education, recre6 ation, and long-term care; 

7 ‘‘(2) to study the use of all practicable means 

8 and methods of encouraging the development of pub9 lic and private programs and policies which will as10 sist the older American in taking a full part in na11 tional life and which will encourage the utilization of 

12 the knowledge, skills, special aptitudes, and abilities 

13 of older Americans to contribute to a better quality 

14 of life for all Americans; 

15 ‘‘(3) to develop policies that would encourage 

16 the coordination of both governmental and private 

17 programs designed to deal with problems of aging; 

18 and 

19 ‘‘(4) to review any recommendations made by 

20 the President or by the White House Conference on 

21 aging relation to programs or policies affecting older 

22 Americans.’’. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
EX-35.1
(logo) LNR
Partners, LLC


ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

OF

LNR PARTNERS, LLC


The undersigned, Job Warshaw, being the President of LNR Partners, LLC (the
"Special Servicer"), as special servicer under the applicable Pooling and
Servicing Agreement for the transactions listed on Schedule II hereto, hereby
certifies, subject to any limitations listed on Schedule II hereto, as of the
date hereof, on behalf of the Special Servicer, solely in his capacity as an
authorized officer of the Special Servicer and not in his individual capacity,
as follows:

1. A review of the activities performed by the Special Servicer during the
   period commencing on January 1, 2013 and ending on December 31, 2013 (or any
   other shorter period set forth on Schedule II hereto) (the "Reporting
   Period"), and of the Special Servicer's performance under the Pooling and
   Servicing Agreement has been made under my supervision; and

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review and using the applicable
   servicing criteria under Item 1122 of Regulation AB, the Special Servicer has
   fulfilled all of its obligations under the applicable Pooling and Servicing
   Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.


LNR PARTNERS, LLC,
a Florida limited liability company

By: /s/ Job Warshaw
        Job Warshaw
        President


Dated: February 28, 2014


1601 Washington Avenue * Suite 700 * Miami Beach, Florida 33139-3164
Telephone: (305) 695-5600 * Fax: (305) 695-5601


(page)


Schedule II

Transaction                                   Certificate Restrictions (if any)
GS Mortgage Securities Corporation II,
Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through
Certificates, Series 2013-GC10
January , 2011 

ACTIO N 

JiC 

SlO-d 10113-008 

^PPARTWENTOF, 

••^/..KiSPORTATlOii 

'•';"! OPERAllUi! 

•7t O m^ 

The Honorable Ray LaHood 

Secretary 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

Re: Continuation of Alaska Airlines' Essential Air Service at Cordova. Gustavus. 

Petersburg. Wranaell. and Yakutat. Alaska. Docket OST-1998-4899 

Dear Secretary LaHood: 

This letter is to express strong support for the selection of Alaska Airlines to continue to 

provide essential air service to our community. 

Alaska's current pattern of service - using jet aircraft - meets crucial needs that would 

be difficult, if not impossible, to meet with any other type of service or aircraft type: 

Alaska's service connects Southeast Alaska passengers to one or more major 

communities of interest, with single-plane service to Anchorage, Juneau, Ketchikan or 

Seattle. From these hubs, our community can access the airline's extensive route 

system and benefit from its marketing relationships with other carriers. The 737-400 

combination ("combi") passenger and cargo aircraft, which Alaska Airlines proposes to 

continue using on this route, provides freight, mail and cargo capacity that a non-jet 

carrier simply cannot provide. Further, the 737-400 combi aircraft is equipped with 

Required Navigation Performance Technology precision technology, which enables the 

airline to reliably access the airport during inclement weather, thus reducing diversions 

and cancellations and, in turn, enabling people and products to dependably reach the 

community. In sum, Alaska's jet service is critical to the economic well being of our 

community. 

For these reasons, we respectfully urge DOT to select Alaska Airlines to continue to 

provide essential air service to Southeast Alaska, as the airline has successfully done for 

more than thirty years. 

Furthermore, at Alaska Commercial we receive our produce and other food items weekly 

from Seattle to serve the community and keep our grocery store well stocked. 

Also, I personally own a B&B in Cordova and 99% of our guests and the tourist to 

Cordova come via Alaska Airlines and any disruption in service would put the economy 

of Cordova into a tailspin. 

Sincerely, 

Dennis Rose 

Branch Manager 

Alaska Commercial Co. 
Dennis Rose 

Owner 

Salmon Beary Inn 

Cordova AK. 

cc; Susan Kurland, Assistant Secretary for Aviation and International Affairs 

Dennis DeVany, Chief, EAS and Domestic Analysis 

The Honorable Sean Parnell, Governor, State of Alaska 

Marc A. Luiken, Commissioner, Alaska State Department of Transportation and 

Public Facilities
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A2 1 A0 18 5 . ANYTI ME BAI L BONDI NG, I NC. v . STATE OF GEORGI A.

An y t i m e Bai l Bo n di ng
, In c. p o s t ed an ap p earan ce b o nd fo r Di eg o An t o n io

Ort i z Go n zal ez fo l l o wi ng h i s arres t fo r d ri v i n g wh i l e l i cen s e s u s p en d ed

. Go n zal ez

fai l ed to ap p ear fo r h i s arrai g n m en t

, an d t he t ri al co u rt en t ered an o rd er s t at i n g t h at

t h e b o n d was fo rfei t ed an d s ch ed u li n g a h eari n g as t o w h et her fi n al ju d g m en t s h o u ld

b e en t ered o n th e fo rfei t ed bo n d an d ex ecu t i o n i s s u ed

. An y t i m e t h en fi l ed a M o t i o n

t o Rel i ev e Su ret y o f Li ab i l i t y un d er OCGA § 1 7 -6 -3 1 (3 ), arg ui n g t h at i t s h o u l d b e

rel eas ed fro m l i ab i li t y b ecau se t h e St at e fai l ed t o t ry G o n zal ez wi t h i n o n e y ear. Th e

t ri al co u rt d e n i ed An y t i m e’ s m o t i o n
, an d An y t i m e fi l ed t h is d irect ap p eal

. W e,

h o wev er, l ack ju ri s di ct i o n.

Th e o rd er An y t i m e s eek s t o ap p eal i s n ot fi n al

, as t h i s act i o n rem ai n s p en d i n g

b efo re t h e t ri al co u rt

. Co n s eq u en t l y , A n y t i m e was req ui red t o u s e t he i n t erl o cu t o ry

ap p eal p ro ced u res – in cl u d in g o b t ai n i n g a cert ifi cat e o f i m m ed i at e rev i ew fro m t h e

t ri al co u rt

– t o ap p eal t h e o rd er d en y i n g i t s M o t i o n t o Rel i ev e Su ret y of Li ab i l i t y

. See

OCGA § 5 -6 -3 4 (b ); Bo

yd v. S t a t e , 1 9 1 G a. Ap p

. 4 35

, 4 3 5 (3 8 3 SE2 d 9 0 6 ) (1 9 8 9 ).

An y t i m e’ s fai l u re to d o s o d ep ri v es u s of ju ri s d i c t i o n o ver t hi s ap p eal

, wh i ch i s

h ereb y DISM ISSED. See Bo

yd , 1 91 Ga. Ap p . at 4 3 5.

April 07, 2021C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O f f i c e

, A t la n t a

,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r t i f y t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a tr u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

.

W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t

h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 04/07/2021
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         426,242
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                8,747,783
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (317,500)
<INVENTORY>                                  7,680,520
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            17,149,016
<PP&E>                                      11,179,662
<DEPRECIATION>                             (3,434,870)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              25,297,353
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      (6,715,938)
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     (285,131)
<OTHER-SE>                                (13,683,821)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              (25,297,353)
<SALES>                                      6,478,165
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,478,165
<CGS>                                      (3,354,426)
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              (6,248,519)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             (178,243)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              (22,500)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           (154,483)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 51,403
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             51,403
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    51,403
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01
        

</TABLE>
GUIDE FOR TRANSFORMER QUADRANT INSTALLATION

When the Then install the TRANSFORMER
SERVICE DROP in the Quadrant below:
in Quadrant: (Deadend Pole) (Tangent Pole)

“At “ot "ote
"B c "D

“cr “AC A
D A B

* May require lowering transformer 3" to
avoid conflict between transformer and neutral.

PRI. NEUTRAL —> “QUADRANTS “

NOTES:

1. Install transformer on deadend poles so that
secondary bushings are adjacent to and face
the primary neutral.

2. Install transformer on tangent poles on a quadrant
on the opposite side of pole from primary neutral;
secondary bushings should face primary neutral.

3. When it is necessary to install transformer in

the same quadrant as a service drop, attach the
service drops 4 inches below the transformer.

4. Install transformer so that primary neutral is
at same height as bottom of transformer lid on
tangent poles, or 3 inches above bottom of
transformer lid on deadend poles.

5. Use compression type connectors (item"p").

6. Standard aluminum alloy or standard soft—
drawn copper is recommended for the grounding

See Note 4

5

loop conductor.

7. Transformer secondary bushings are not to be
used for bi—metal connections.

8. Cover secondary terminals with moisture seal of service drop.
and/or dress conductor ends downward to prevent See Note 3
entry of moisture. (Mininum bending radius is

six times the overall cable diameter).

Alternate position

TRANSFORMER

INSTALLATION GUIDE

SINGLE—PHASE, POLE—TYPE TRANSFORMER

DEC_1998
RUS

G1.1G
#### STERLING, Appellant, v. PEALE, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

November 27, 1914.)

Action by Louis V. Sterling against Roscoe S. Peale.

No opinion. Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 245 (Wednesday, December 22, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 80544]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-32352]



[[Page 80544]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

MILLENNIUM CHALLENGE CORPORATION

[MCC FR 10-16]


Change of Date for December 15, 2010 Millennium Challenge 
Corporation Board of Directors Meeting; Sunshine Act Meeting

AGENCY: Millennium Challenge Corporation.

TIME AND DATE: 10 a.m. to 12 p.m., Wednesday, January 5, 2011.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Information on the meeting may be 
obtained from Melvin Williams, Jr., Vice President, General Counsel and 
Corporate Secretary via e-mail at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f0b39f82809f82918495839593829584918289b09d9393de979f86"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="febd918c8e918c9f8a9b8d9b9d8c9b8a9f8c87be939d9dd0999188">[email protected]</span></a> or by 
telephone at (202) 521-3600.

Background

    On November 23, 2010, the Millennium Challenge Corporation 
published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to the Government 
in the Sunshine Act (5 U.S.C. 552b) stating that the MCC Board of 
Directors would hold a meeting December 15, 2010. (Volume 75, Number 
225, page 71465) This meeting is now being moved to January 5, 2011. 
All other details regarding the place, status, and matters to be 
considered remain the same.

Amendment

    The time and date of the meeting are amended to read: 10 a.m. to 12 
p.m., Wednesday, January 5, 2011

    Dated: December 20, 2010.
Melvin F. Williams, Jr.,
VP/General Counsel and Corporate Secretary, Millennium Challenge 
Corporation.
[FR Doc. 2010-32352 Filed 12-20-10; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 9211-03-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Subpart 1843.2—Change Orders

Parent topic: PART 1843—CONTRACT MODIFICATIONS

1843.205 Contract clauses.

As authorized in the prefaces of clauses FAR 52.243–1, Changes—Fixed Price; FAR 52.243–2,

Changes—Cost Reimbursement; and FAR 52.243–4, Changes; and in the prescription at 43.205(c)

for FAR 52.243–3, Changes—Time-and-Material or Labor-Hours, the period within which a

contractor must assert its right to an equitable adjustment may be varied not to exceed 60 calendar

days.

1843.205-70 NASA contract clauses.

The contracting officer may insert a clause substantially as stated at 1852.243–72, Equitable

Adjustments, in solicitations and contracts for—

(a) Dismantling, demolishing, or removing improvements; or

(b) Construction, when the contract amount is expected to exceed the simplified acquisition

threshold and a fixed-price contract is contemplated.
H. Res. 34 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

January 9, 2017. 

Resolved, That the following named Member be, and is 

hereby, elected to the following standing committee of the 

House of Representatives: 

COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES: Mr. Smith of Washington. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
§ 71.77 Qualification of LSA-III Material. ( a ) LSA-III material must meet the test requirements of paragraph (b) of this section. Any differences between the specimen to be tested and the material to be transported must be taken into account in determining whether the test requirements have been met.
( b ) *Leaching test.* ( 1 ) The specimen, representing no less than the entire contents of the package, must be immersed for 7 days in water at ambient temperature;
( 2 ) The volume of water to be used in the test must be sufficient to ensure that at the end of the test period the free volume of the unabsorbed and unreacted water remaining will be at least 10% of the volume of the specimen itself;
( 3 ) The water must have an initial pH of 6-8 and a maximum conductivity 10 micromho/cm at 20 °C (68 °F); and
( 4 ) The total activity of the free volume of water must be measured following the 7 day immersion test and must not exceed 0.1 A2.
#### § 75.5 Interpretations.

Except as authorized specifically by the Commission in writing, no interpretation of the meaning of the regulations in this part by any officer or employee of the Commission other than a written interpretation by the General Counsel will be recognized to be binding upon the Commission.
#### CIGGIO v. RODGERS & HAGERTY, Inc.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department.

December 4, 1914.)

Master and Servant (§ 265*)—Injuries to Servant—Negligence—Proof. Where, in an action for injuries to a servant, defendant’s alleged negligence was not proved, but left entirely to conjecture, a judgment for plaintiff could not be sustained.

[Ed. Note.-—For other cases, see Master and Servant, Cent. Dig. §§ 877-908, 955; Dec. Dig. § 265.*]

Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of The Bronx, Second District.

Action by Lorenzo Ciggio against Rodgers & Hagerty, Incorporated. From a Municipal Court judgment in favor of plaintiff, defendant appeals. Reversed and dismissed.

Argued October term, 1914, before SEABURY, BIJUR, and COHALAN, JJ.

Frank Verner Johnson, of New York City (Oliver R. Brant, of New York City, of counsel), for appellant. .

C. Arthur Arnstein, of New York City, for respondent.

*

For other cases see same topic *&*§ number in Dec. & Am. Digs. 1907 to date, *&*Rep’r Indexes

SEABURY, J.

This is an action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained through the alleged negligence of the defendant. The evidence is meager and insufficient to establish a cause of action. Plaintiff proved that he was directed by his “boss” to dump a box, and that while engaged in that act his finger was caught and injured. The alleged negligence of the defendant seems to have been left entirely to conjecture; certainly it was not proved.

Judgment reversed, and complaint dismissed, with costs in this court and in the court below. All concur.