alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Ed Gomez et al., Appellants, v City of New York, Respondent.

[813 NYS2d 917]

In an action, inter alia, for a judgment declaring that a resolution adopted by the Board of Estimate of the City of New York on May 1, 1936, as amended November 11, 1955 and May 23, 1957, constitutes an unconstitutional taking of the plaintiffs’ property, the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Mega, J.), dated June 13, 2005, as denied their motion for summary judgment.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

*739The plaintiffs failed to put forth evidence in admissible form establishing that they are entitled to judgment as a matter of law on the claim alleging an unconstitutional taking of their property *(see*CPLR 3212 [b]). Moreover, on the record before us, the plaintiffs failed to establish, prima facie, that any policy of the defendant existed by which the plaintiffs were denied equal protection of the laws *(see Goodwin v Perales,*88 NY2d 383, 398 [1996]; *Payne v County of Sullivan,*12 AD3d 807, 809 [2004]). Florio, J.P., Miller, Adams and Skelos, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 747 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 747

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to require that all 
   members of the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence and all 
      members of the Subcommittee on Defense of the Committee on 
                Appropriations have security clearances.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 30, 2006

Mr. Buyer submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                           Committee on Rules

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to require that all 
   members of the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence and all 
      members of the Subcommittee on Defense of the Committee on 
                Appropriations have security clearances.

    Resolved, That (a) clause 11(a) of rule X of the Rules of the House 
of Representatives is amended by adding at the end the following new 
subparagraph:
    ``(5) No Member, Delegate, or Resident Commissioner may serve as a 
member of the select committee until such Member, Delegate, or Resident 
Commissioner receives a security clearance at the highest level 
required of any staff of the select committee. Any such security 
clearance shall be renewed at least every 4 years.''.
    (b) Clause 11 of rule X of the Rules of the House of 
Representatives is amended by adding at the end the following new 
paragraph:
    ``(f) No Member, Delegate, or Resident Commissioner may serve as a 
member of the Subcommittee on Defense of the Committee on 
Appropriations until such Member, Delegate, or Resident Commissioner 
receives a security clearance at the highest level required of any 
staff of the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence. Any such 
security clearance shall be renewed at least every 4 years.''.
    (c) The amendments made by this resolution shall take effect 
immediately before noon January 3, 2007.
                                 <all>
```
§ 770.7 What procedures are to be used to transfer real property at defense nuclear facilities for economic development? ( a ) *Proposal.* The transfer process starts when a potential purchaser or lessee submits to the Field Office Manager a proposal for the transfer of real property that DOE has included on a list of available real property, as provided in § 770.5 of this part. ( 1 ) A proposal must include (but is not limited to): ( i ) A description of the real property proposed to be transferred;
( ii ) The intended use and duration of use of the real property, including potential users and an indication that these users are interested in participating in the economic development of the property;
( iii ) A description of the economic development that would be furthered by the transfer (*e.g.,* jobs to be created or retained, improvements to be made) or what reuse or reutilization would be accomplished by means of a description of the business to be created (direct and indirect economic benefits that will result due to the proposed transfer);
( iv ) Information supporting the economic viability of the proposed development; and
( v ) The consideration offered and any financial requirements.
( 2 ) The person or entity should state in the proposal whether it is or is not requesting indemnification against claims based on the release or threatened release of a hazardous substance or pollutant or contaminant resulting from DOE activities.
( 3 ) If a proposal for transfer does not contain a statement regarding indemnification, the Field Office Manager will notify the person or entity by letter of the potential availability of indemnification under this part, and will request that the person or entity either modify the proposal to include a request for indemnification or submit a statement that it is not seeking indemnification.
( b ) *Decision to transfer real property.* After review of the proposal, DOE will notify, by letter, the person or entity that submitted the proposal of DOE's decision whether or not a transfer of the real property by sale or lease is in the best interest of the Government. If DOE determines the transfer is in the Government's best interest, then the Field Office Manger will begin development of a transfer agreement.
( c ) *Congressional committee notification.* DOE may not transfer real property under this part until 30 days have elapsed after the date DOE notifies congressional defense committees of the proposed transfer. The Field Office Manager will notify congressional defense committees through the Secretary of Energy.
[65 FR 10689, Feb. 29, 2000, as amended at 78 FR 67927, Nov. 13, 2013]
Court of Appeals, State of Michigan 

ORDER 

In re S Kanjia Minor 

Docket No. 320055 

LC No. I 1-053881 -NA 

Stephen L. Borrello 

Presiding Judge 

Deborah A. Servitto 

Douglas B. Shapiro 

Judges 

The Court orders that the motion for reconsideration is GRANTED, and this Court's 

opinion issued October 21, 2014 is hereby VACA TED. A new opinion is attached to this order. 

A true copy entered and certified by Jerome W. Zimmer Jr., Chief Clerk, on 

DEC 3 o 2014 

Date
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Area 3 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Monday, March 8, 2010.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sallie Chavez at 1-888-912-1227 or 954-423-7979.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that a meeting of the Area 3 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be held Monday, March 8, 2010, at 2:30 p.m. Eastern Time via telephone conference. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited conference lines, notification of intent to participate must be made with Sallie Chavez. For more information please contact Ms. Chavez at 1-888-912-1227 or 954-423-7979, or write TAP Office, 1000 South Pine Island Road, Suite 340, Plantation, FL 33324, or post comments to the Web site:                     *http://www.improveirs.org.*

The agenda will include various IRS issues.

*Reason for Late Notice:*                     Due to inclement weather and Federal office closings in the District of Columbia, key TAP staff was unavailable to prepare and submit notice in time to meet the 15-day notice requirement. Scheduling conflicts with other meetings prevent rescheduling this meeting.                

Dated: February 12, 2010.

Linda Rivera,

Senior Program Analyst, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.

[FR Doc. 2010-3181 Filed 2-18-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 571 Committee Discharged House (CDH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 571

     Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the 
 deployment of United States forces in Iraq be terminated immediately.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 18, 2005

 Mr. Hunter submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                the Committee on International Relations

                           November 18, 2005

  The Committee on International Relations discharged; considered and 
                           failed of adoption

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
     Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the 
 deployment of United States forces in Iraq be terminated immediately.

    Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives that 
the deployment of United States forces in Iraq be terminated 
immediately.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Intervoice, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ended November 30, 2002, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David
W. Brandenburg, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



Date: January 14, 2003
                                      /s/ David W. Brandenburg
                                      ------------------------------------------
                                      David W. Brandenburg
                                      Chief Executive Officer and Chairman
#### Dewberry *v.*The State.

May 13, 1913.

Indictment for murder. Before Judge Thomas. Fulton superior court. February 15, 1913.

*Calhoun & Connally,*for plaintiff in error.

*Thomas 8. Felder, attorney-general, Hugh M. Dorsey, solicitor-general,*and *William J. Laney,*contra.

Fish, C. J.

There was no complaint that any error of law was committed upon the trial. The evidence warranted the verdict, and the court did not err in refusing a new trial.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
IV 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 663 

Urging the release of information regarding the September 11, 2001, terrorist 

attacks upon the United States. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 13, 2017 

Mr. JONES (for himself, Mr. LYNCH, and Mr. MASSIE) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and 

Government Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Urging the release of information regarding the September 

11, 2001, terrorist attacks upon the United States. 

Whereas tens of thousands of pages of documents relating to 

the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, remain classified by the Federal Government; 

Whereas the contents of these documents are necessary for 

a full public understanding of the events and circumstances surrounding the September 11, 2001, attacks 

upon the United States; 

Whereas the decision to maintain the classified status of 

many of these documents prevents the people of the 

United States from having access to information about 

the attacks, including the involvement of certain foreign 

governments; and 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 663 IH 

Whereas the people of the United States and the families of 

the victims of the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks 

deserve full and public disclosure of the events surrounding the attack: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that— 

3 (1) documents related to the events of Sep4 tember 11, 2001, should be declassified to the great5 est extent possible; and 

6 (2) the survivors, the families of the victims, 

7 and the people of the United States deserve answers 

8 about the events and circumstances surrounding the 

9 September 11, 2001, attacks upon the United 

10 States. 

Æ 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit
      32.2**





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Patient Safety Technologies, Inc. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2005 as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
      I, William B. Horne, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





Date: September
              13, 2005
            By:
            /s/ William
              B. HorneWilliam
                B. Horne
              Chief
                Financial Officer
Case 2:06-mc-03334-MHT Document 12 Filed 10/04/2006 Page 1 of 9
Case 2:06-mc-03334-MHT Document 12 Filed 10/04/2006 Page 2 of 9
Case 2:06-mc-03334-MHT Document 12 Filed 10/04/2006 Page 3 of 9
Case 2:06-mc-03334-MHT Document 12 Filed 10/04/2006 Page 4 of 9
Case 2:06-mc-03334-MHT Document 12 Filed 10/04/2006 Page 5 of 9
Case 2:06-mc-03334-MHT Document 12 Filed 10/04/2006 Page 6 of 9
Case 2:06-mc-03334-MHT Document 12 Filed 10/04/2006 Page 7 of 9
Case 2:06-mc-03334-MHT Document 12 Filed 10/04/2006 Page 8 of 9
Case 2:06-mc-03334-MHT Document 12 Filed 10/04/2006 Page 9 of 9
#### Ugenia Young, Respondent-Appellant, v Delta Air Lines, Inc., Appellant-Respondents.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered September 12, 1979, granting in part and denying in part defendant’s motion for summary judgment, is unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent that defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the second and third causes of action in the complaint is granted and said causes of action are dismissed, and the order is otherwise affirmed, without costs. It is clear from the complaint and the bill of particulars that the present action is not for an insult to a passenger but rather for negligence and misconduct in connection with the transportation and consequent death of plaintiffs dog. In such circumstances, plaintiffs damages are limited by applicable tariff filed with the Civil Aeronautics Board to $500 and may not be increased beyond that by allegations of emotional distress to plaintiff or claims for punitive damages. *(Crosby & Co. v Compagnie Nationale Air France,*76 Misc 2d 990, 996-999, affd 42 AD2d 1050; *Blair v Delta Air Lines,*344 F Supp 360; *Tishman & Lipp v Delta Air Lines,*275 F Supp 471, 480, affd 413 F2d 1401.) And even apart from the tariffs, New York law does not permit recovery for mental suffering and emotional disturbance as an element of damages for loss of a passenger’s property *(Cohen v Varig Airlines,*62 AD2d 324, 336); nor does this appear to be a case where punitive damages could be awarded under New York law. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Sandler, Ross, Silverman and Carro, JJ.
EX-31 Rule13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications.

 

 

I, Anthony Sfarra,certify that:

 

1. I have reviewedthis report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed inrespect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of the WFRBSCommercial Mortgage Trust 2013-C12 (the "Exchange Act periodicreports");

 

2. Based on myknowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3. Based on myknowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required tobe provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is includedin the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4. Based on myknowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report underItem 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Actperiodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under theservicing agreements in all material respects; and

 

5. All of the reportson assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securitiesand their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance withservicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in thisreport in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except asotherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliancedescribed in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving thecertifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me bythe following unaffiliated parties:

 

National CooperativeBank, N.A. (successor to NCB, FSB), as NCB Master Servicer, Rialto CapitalAdvisors, LLC, as Special Servicer, National Cooperative Bank, N.A. (successor toNCB, FSB), as Co-op Special Servicer, U.S. Bank National Association, asTrustee, Pentalpha Surveillance LLC, as Trust Advisor, CoreLogic CommercialReal Estate Services, Inc., as Servicing Function Participant, National TaxSearch, LLC, as Servicing Function Participant, and Prudential Asset Resources,Inc., as Primary Servicer.

 

 

 

Dated: March18, 2020

 

 

/s/ AnthonySfarra

 

 

President

(seniorofficer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, 

NORTHERN DIVISION

J.B., a minor child, by and through his )

next friend, ADDIE WARD, on behalf of )

himself and all other similarly situated; )

) Case No: 2:06-CV-755-MHT

Plaintiff, )

)

vs. )

)

WALTER WOOD, in his individual )

capacity, )

)

Defendant. )

J.B., a minor child, by and through his )

next friend, ADDIE WARD, on behalf of )

himself and all other similarly situated; )

) Case No: 2:06-CV-908-MHT

Plaintiff, )

)

vs. )

)

WALTER WOOD, in his individual )

capacity, )

)

Defendant. )

EXHIBIT LIST FOR TRIAL

COMES NOW, the Defendant, J. Walter Wood, Jr, through counsel, and lists the

following exhibits that may be used during trial. 

Case 2:06-cv-00755-MHT-CSC Document 63 Filed 08/22/2007 Page 1 of 2
Exhibit 1 J.B. Commitment documents

Exhibit 2 J. B. Deposition 

In addition, the Defendant reserves the right to offer any additional documents as

evidence for purposes of impeachment and/or rebuttal.

 Respectfully submitted,

TROY KING

ATTORNEY GENERAL

 s/ T. Dudley Perry, Jr. 

T. Dudley Perry, Jr. 

Bar Number: (PER-034)

Deputy Attorney General

Attorney for Defendants

Alabama Department of Youth Services

Post Office Box 66

Mt. Meigs, Alabama 36057

Telephone: (334) 215-3803

Fax: (334) 215-3872

E-Mail: dudley.perry@dys.alabama.gov 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

 I hereby certify that on the 22 day of August 2007, I electronically filed the foregoing nd

Exhibit List For Trial, with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send

notification of such filing to the following:

Robert D Drummond

Attorney at Law

323 De LaMare

Fairhope, AL 36532

Michael J. Crow

Beasley, Allen, Crow, Methvin, Portis & Miles, P. C.

P. O. Box 4160

Montgomery, AL 36103-4160

Case 2:06-cv-00755-MHT-CSC Document 63 Filed 08/22/2007 Page 2 of 2
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Standard technicalspecifications [electronic resource] : Babcock and Wilcox plants.**
 
Volumes: 0102
 
SuDoc Number:Y 3.N 88:10/1430/v.1-2/REV.3
Item Number:1051-H-02
CGP systemNumber:000562531
 
October 24, 2018