alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 35
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 35 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

§ 35.643 Periodic spot-checks for remote afterloader units. ( a ) A licensee authorized to use a remote afterloader unit for medical use shall perform spot-checks of each remote afterloader facility and on each unit— ( 1 ) Before the first use of a high dose-rate, medium dose-rate, or pulsed dose-rate remote afterloader unit on a given day;
( 2 ) Before each patient treatment with a low dose-rate remote afterloader unit; and
( 3 ) After each source installation.
( b ) A licensee shall perform the measurements required by paragraph (a) of this section in accordance with written procedures established by the authorized medical physicist. That individual need not actually perform the spot check measurements.
( c ) A licensee shall have the authorized medical physicist review the results of each spot-check within 15 days. The authorized medical physicist shall notify the licensee as soon as possible in writing of the results of each spot-check.
( d ) To satisfy the requirements of paragraph (a) of this section, spot-checks must, at a minimum, assure proper operation of— ( 1 ) Electrical interlocks at each remote afterloader unit room entrance;
( 2 ) Source exposure indicator lights on the remote afterloader unit, on the control console, and in the facility;
( 3 ) Viewing and intercom systems in each high dose-rate, medium dose-rate, and pulsed dose-rate remote afterloader facility;
( 4 ) Emergency response equipment;
( 5 ) Radiation monitors used to indicate the source position;
( 6 ) Timer accuracy;
( 7 ) Clock (date and time) in the unit's computer; and
( 8 ) Decayed source(s) activity in the unit's computer.
( e ) If the results of the checks required in paragraph (d) of this section indicate the malfunction of any system, a licensee shall lock the control console in the off position and not use the unit except as may be necessary to repair, replace, or check the malfunctioning system.
( f ) A licensee shall retain a record of each check required by paragraph (d) of this section and a copy of the procedures required by paragraph (b) of this section in accordance with § 35.2643.
# EUR-Lex - 31974D0362 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31974D0362

**74/362/EEC: Commission Decision of 13 June 1974 exempting the United Kingdom from applying to certain species the Council Directive of 14 June 1966 on the marketing of fodder plant seed (Only the English text is authentic) **

*
Official Journal L 196 , 19/07/1974 P. 0020 - 0020 *

COMMISSION DECISION of 13 June 1974 exempting the United Kingdom from applying to certain species the Council Directive of 14 June 1966 on the marketing of fodder plant seed (Only the English text is authentic) (74/362/EEC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community;

Having regard to the Council Directive of 14 June 1966 (1) on the marketing of fodder plant seed, as last amended by the Council Directive of 11 December 1973 (2), and in particular Article 23a thereof;

Having regard to the request from the United Kingdom;

Whereas meadow foxtail, swamp meadowgrass, golden oatgrass, sulla, berseem, egyptian clover, crimson clover, persian clover and fenugreck species are not normally cultivated in the United Kingdom ; whereas the seeds of these species are not propagated or marketed there;

Whereas these conditions have held for sometime, it is appropriate to exempt the United Kingdom from applying the provisions of this Directive to the species in question;

Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the Opinion of the Standing Committee on Seeds and Propagating Material for Agriculture, Horticulture and Forestry,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The United Kingdom is exempt from applying the Council Directive of 14 June 1966 on the marketing of fodder plant seed, with the exception of the provisions of Article 14 (1), to the species listed below:

>PIC FILE= "T9000607">

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the United Kingdom.

Done at Brussels, 13 June 1974.

For the Commission

The President

François-Xavier ORTOLI (1)OJ No 125, 11.7.1966, p. 2298/66. (2)OJ No L 356, 27.12.1973, p. 79.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-1136

DERICK J. NOEL; HILARY A. FINDLEY,

Plaintiffs - Appellants,

v.

J.R. ATKINSON, trading as Atkinson Truck Sales,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, Senior District 

Judge. (8:08-cv-01978-PJM)

Submitted: August 20, 2010 Decided: August 26, 2010

Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John F. Pressley, Jr., Washington, D.C., for Appellants. 

Phillip R. Zuber, SASSCER, CLAGETT & BUCHER, Upper Marlboro, 

Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Derick J. Noel and Hilary A. Findley appeal the 

district court’s orders granting summary judgment in favor of 

J.R. Atkinson (t/a Atkinson Truck Sales) on a complaint based on 

the repossession of a motor vehicle. We have reviewed the 

record and the parties’ briefs and conclude that the district 

court properly determined that the repossession at issue was 

permissible according to the terms of the contract and state 

law. Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### § 71.137 Audits.

The licensee, certificate holder, and applicant for a CoC shall carry out a comprehensive system of planned and periodic audits to verify compliance with all aspects of the quality assurance program and to determine the effectiveness of the program. The audits must be performed in accordance with written procedures or checklists by appropriately trained personnel not having direct responsibilities in the areas being audited. Audited results must be documented and reviewed by management having responsibility in the area audited. Followup action, including reaudit of deficient areas, must be taken where indicated.
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Commercial Mortgage Servicing**D1086-120, 12th Floor550 South Tyron StreetCharlotte, NC 28202 1-800-326-1334 |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

 

Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of March 1, 2013, by and among WELLS FARGO COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES, INC., as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as General Master Servicer, RIALTO CAPITAL ADVISORS, LLC, as General Special Servicer, NCB, FSB, as NCB Master Servicer, NCB, FSB, as Co-op Special Servicer, PENTALPHA SURVEILLANCE LLC, as Trust Advisor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Certificate Administrator, as Tax Administrator and as Custodian, and U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee, with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates WFRBS 2013-C12 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 11.12 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1. A review of the activities of the General Master Servicer during the period from January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and

 

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the General Master Servicer, has fulfilled all of its obligations under this Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 4th day of March 2016.

 

 

/s/ Daniel Bober

Daniel Bober

Executive Vice President

Wells Fargo Bank

 

 
| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A |  (logo) Together we’ll go far |
|-----------------------|------------------------------------------|
PGI 207.470 Statutory requirements.

The contracting officer should obtain additional information on the definition of “substantial

termination liability” by contacting the servicing legal adviser.

Parent topic: PGI 207.4 -EQUIPMENT LEASE OR PURCHASE
IV 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1119 

Urging the people of the United States to observe October of each year 

as Italian and Italian-American Heritage Month. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 5, 2018 

Mr. PASCRELL (for himself and Mr. AMODEI) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government 

Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Urging the people of the United States to observe October 

of each year as Italian and Italian-American Heritage Month. 

Whereas Italian and Italian-American Heritage Month is an 

appropriate time to recognize the enormous contributions 

the Italian and Italian-American people have made to 

this country and the world throughout our history, including generals, admirals, philosophers, statesmen, musicians, athletes, and Nobel Prize-winning scientists; 

Whereas Italian and Italian-American Heritage Month is held 

to salute the Italian and Italian-American community 

and to exhibit appreciation for their culture and their 

heritage that have immeasurably enriched the lives of the 

people of this Nation and the world; 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1119 IH 

Whereas the strength and success of the United States, the 

vitality of our communities, and the effectiveness of our 

American society depend, in great measure, upon the distinctive and sterling qualities demonstrated by our various ethnic groups, exemplified by members of the Italian 

and Italian-American community, who share with us their 

rich and unique heritage; and 

Whereas it is fitting and proper that October of each year be 

observed as Italian and Italian-American Heritage Month 

throughout the United States: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That in order to recognize the enormous 

2 contributions Italian and Italian-American people have 

3 made to this country and the world throughout our his4 tory, the House of Representatives urges the people of the 

5 United States to acknowledge an Italian and Italian6 American Heritage Month and to observe the month with 

7 appropriate events and activities. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
#### § 25.1 Purpose.

The regulations in this part establish procedures for granting, reinstating, extending, transferring, and terminating access authorizations of licensee personnel, licensee contractors or agents, and other persons (e.g., individuals involved in adjudicatory procedures as set forth in 10 CFR part 2, subpart I) who may require access to classified information.

[62 FR 17687, Apr. 11, 1997]
114 STAT. 788 PUBLIC LAW 106–267—SEPT. 22, 2000

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 1901:

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 106–586 (Comm. on Transportation and Infrastructure).

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 146 (2000):

May 3, considered and passed House.

Sept. 13, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 106–267

106th Congress

An Act

To designate the United States border station located in Pharr, Texas, as the

‘‘Kika de la Garza United States Border Station’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

The United States border station located in Pharr, Texas, shall

be known and designated as the ‘‘Kika de la Garza United States

Border Station’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the border station referred

to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Kika

de la Garza United States Border Station’’.

Approved September 22, 2000.

Sept. 22, 2000

[H.R. 1901]
#### § 455.80 Purpose.

This subpart describes what constitutes a State administrative expense that may receive financial assistance under this part and sets forth the eligibility criteria for States to receive grants for administrative expenses.
NATIONALTAX SEARCH(logo)

 

REPORT ONASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION’S REGULATION AB SERVICING CRITERIA

 

Forthe calendar year ending December 31, 2018, National Tax Search, LLC has been a Tax Service Vendor for **Wells Fargo Bank N.A.**(the “Servicer”)**.**

** **

NationalTax Search, LLC (“NTS”) is responsible for assessing compliance as of December 31, 2018 and for the period from January1, 2018 through December 31, 2018 (the “Reporting Period”) with the servicing criteria set forth in Title 17, Section229.1122(d) of the Code of Federal Regulations (the “CFR”). NTS has used the servicing criteria communicated to NTSby the Servicer to assess compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Only servicing criteria 1122(d)(l)(ii), 1122(d)(1)(iv),1122(d)(2)(ii), 1122 (d)(2)(v), 1122(d)2(vi), 1122(d)(4)(xi), and 1122(d)(4)(xii) (the “Applicable Servicing Criteria”)are applicable to the activities NTS performs with respect to the transactions covered by this report. NTS has determined thatthe remaining servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the SEC Regulation AB are not applicable to the activities it performswith respect to the transactions covered by this report. The transactions covered by this report include all tax payments madeon behalf of the Servicer using NTS’s TaxQ system (the “Platform Transactions”).

 

NTS,as a vendor, has assessed its compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria for the Reporting Period and has concluded thatNTS has complied, in all material respects, with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2018 and for the ReportingPeriod with respect to the Platform Transactions taken as a whole.

 

Plante& Moran, PLLC, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on the assessment of compliancewith the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2018 and for the Reporting Period as set forth in this assertion.

 

NationalTax Search, LLC, as Vendor to Servicer

 

/s/Lori D. Eshoo

LoriD. Eshoo, President/CEO

January25, 2019

 

130 S. JeffersonStreet

Suite300

Chicago,IL 60661
#### Florence Caldicott, Appellant, v. City of New York, Respondent.

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered on or about December 4, 1967 in favor of defendant, upon a jury verdict. Judgment reversed, on the law, and new trial granted, with costs to abide the event. The findings of fact below are affirmed. Plaintiff sustained her injuries in a sidewalk fall, allegedly caused by an elevated flagstone. The height of the elevation was variously described as being about two inches (by plaintiff), between two and three inches (by plaintiff’s daughter), and one and one-half to two inches (by the owner of a nearby store). Under the circumstances, the question of liability was close. During the charge, the court told the jury that the ease was being submitted to them “ only because of the testimony of the daughter, that it was 2 to 3 inches in height.” This statement, coupled with the comments concerning the estimates of plaintiff and the other witnesses, was tantamount to a charge that, as a matter of law, plaintiff could not recover unless the elevation exceeded two inches in height. The court charged further that “ It is only when the condition is such that it creates a trap that a plaintiff has a right to recover ” and that “ You must first find, before you can find for this lady, that this was a trap ”, There is no rule that a sidewalk defect must be of certain minimum dimensions or constitute “ a trap ” in order to render a municipality liable for injuries sustained thereby. “A municipality’s liability depends on whether or not, having in mind the circumstances of each case, it has neglected and failed to keep its public thoroughfares * * * in a condition reasonably safe for pedestrians ” *(Loughran*v. *City of New York,*298 N. Y. 320, 322). Accordingly, a new trial should be granted (cf. *Monllas*v. *City of New York,*27 A D 2d 722). In passing, we note that the court should not have charged the jury that “if you believe that the photograph, Defendant’s Exhibit A, correctly, portrays the condition that existed on the day of this accident, your verdict must be for the defendant”. Not only was there no evidence that this photograph fairly represented the defect as it existed at the time of the accident, but each witness who was questioned in this regard affirmatively testified to the contrary. Under the circumstances, the instruction invited a finding that was unsupported by the evidence and tended to lend an air of authenticity to the photograph that was unjustified by the evidence. Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, Rabin, Munder and Martuscello, JJ., concur.
§ 455.123 Grantee records and reports for State grants for administrative expenses, technical assistance, program assistance, and marketing. ( a ) Each State which receives a grant for administrative expenses, or a grant for technical assistance programs, program assistance, or marketing shall keep all the records required by § 455.4 in accordance with this part and the DOE Financial Assistance Rules.
( b ) Each State shall submit a semi-annual program performance report to DOE by the close of each February and August, including, but not limited to: ( 1 ) A discussion of administrative activities pursuant to § 455.82, if a State has received a grant to fund such activities, and a discussion of milestones accomplished, those not accomplished, status of in-progress activities, problems encountered, and remedial actions, if any, planned pursuant to § 455.135(f);
( 2 ) A discussion of technical assistance, program assistance, and/or marketing programs pursuant to § 455.121, if the State has received grants to fund such activities, including a discussion of the results of the State's program to non-Federally fund energy conservation measures consistent with this part pursuant to § 455.121, with a list of buildings receiving assistance for technical assistance programs and a list of buildings which obtained energy conservation measures using non-Federal funds, including the name and address of each building, the amount and type of funding provided to each, and for energy conservation measures, the types of measures funded in each building together with each measure's total estimated cost and estimated annual cost savings, annual energy savings, and the annual cost of the energy to be saved (determined pursuant to § 455.62(d)) consistent with the data currently provided to DOE on all ICP grants;
( 3 ) A summary of grantee reports received by the State during the report period pursuant to §§ 455.113(b)(1) and (b)(2);
( 4 ) For the report due to be submitted to DOE by the close of each August, an estimate of annual energy use reductions in the State, by energy source, attributable to implementation of energy conservation maintenance and operating procedures and installation of energy conservation measures under this part. Such estimates shall be based upon a sampling of institutions participating in the technical assistance phase of this program and upon the energy use reports submitted to the State pursuant to § 455.113(b)(2)(iii); and
( 5 ) Such other information as DOE may from time to time request.
( c ) Each copy of any report covering grants for State administrative, technical assistance, program assistance, or marketing expenses shall be accompanied by a financial status report completed in accordance with the documents listed in § 455.3. In addition, States shall file quarterly financial status reports for the quarters which occur between the semi-annual report periods covered in their program performance reports. These quarterly reports are due within 30 days following the end of the applicable quarters.
PGI 251.101 Policy.

(a)(1) When authorizing contractors to use Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) Energy as a source of

fuel in performance of other than cost-reimbursement contracts, contracting officers shall—

(i) Comply with the requirements of FAR 51.101 and DFARS 251.102, including the execution of a

letter of authorization;

(ii) Include FAR clause 52.251-1, Government Supply Sources, and DFARS clause 252.251-7000,

Ordering From Government Supply Sources, in the contract;

(iii) Obtain a current DLA Energy Fuel Purchase Authorization (FPA) from DLA Energy by emailing

dlaenergyfpa@dla.mil;

(iv) Email to DLA Energy, at dlaenergyfpa@dla.mil, a copy of the—

(A) Completed FPA;

(B) Letter of authorization from the contracting officer; and

(C) Documentation showing the inclusion of FAR clause 52.251-1 and DFARS clause 252.251-7000 in

the underlying contract.

(2) Upon receipt of the documentation in paragraph (a)(1)(iv)(A)-(C) of this section, DLA Energy will

work with all parties to review the FPA for accuracy and completion. If approved, DLA Energy will

assign a Department of Defense Activity Address Code for the fuel sales.

Parent topic: PGI 251.1 - CONTRACTOR USE OF GOVERNMENT SUPPLY SOURCES
§ 709.17 Final disposition of CI evaluation findings and recommendations. ( a ) Following completion of a CI evaluation, the Director of the Office of Intelligence and Counterintelligence must recommend, in writing, to the appropriate Program Manager that the covered person's access be approved or retained, or denied or revoked.
( b ) If the Program Manager agrees with the recommendation, the Program Manager notifies the covered person that the covered person's access has been approved or retained, or denied or revoked.
( c ) If the Program Manager disagrees with the recommendation of the Director, Office of Intelligence and Counterintelligence, the matter is referred to the Secretary for a final decision.
( d ) If the Program Manager denies or revokes a DOE employee's access, DOE may reassign the employee or realign the employee's duties within the local commuting area or take other actions consistent with the denial of access.
( e ) If the Program Manager revokes the access of a covered person assigned or detailed to DOE, DOE may remove the assignee or detailee from access to the information that justified the CI evaluation and return the assignee or detailee to the agency of origin.
( f ) Covered persons whose access is denied or revoked may request reconsideration by the head of the relevant DOE element.
( g ) For cases involving a question of loyalty to the United States, the Director of the Office of Intelligence and Counterintelligence may refer the matter to the FBI as required by section 145d of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954. For cases indicating that classified information is being, or may have been, disclosed in an unauthorized manner to a foreign power or an agent of a foreign power, DOE is required by 50 U.S.C. 402a(e) to refer the matter to the Federal Bureau of Investigation.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 21 - 0517 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. SHANE CLARK JOHNSON,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including July 14 , 2023, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

June 6 2023

06/06/2023

Case Number: DA 21-0517