alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 52.167 Issuance of manufacturing license. ( a ) After completing any hearing under § 52.163, and receiving the report submitted by the ACRS, the Commission may issue a manufacturing license if the Commission finds that: ( 1 ) Applicable standards and requirements of the Act and the Commission's regulations have been met;
( 2 ) There is reasonable assurance that the reactor(s) will be manufactured, and can be transported, incorporated into a nuclear power plant, and operated in conformity with the manufacturing license, the provision of the Act, and the Commission's regulations;
( 3 ) The proposed reactor(s) can be incorporated into a nuclear power plant and operated at sites having characteristics that fall within the site parameters postulated for the design of the manufactured reactor(s) without undue risk to the health and safety of the public;
( 4 ) The applicant is technically qualified to design and manufacture the proposed nuclear power reactor(s);
( 5 ) The proposed inspections, tests, analyses and acceptance criteria are necessary and sufficient, within the scope of the manufacturing license, to provide reasonable assurance that the manufactured reactor has been manufactured and will be operated in conformity with the license, the provisions of the Act, and the Commission's regulations;
( 6 ) The issuance of a license to the applicant will not be inimical to the common defense and security or to the health and safety of the public; and
( 7 ) The findings required by subpart A of part 51 of this chapter have been made.
( b ) Each manufacturing license issued under this subpart shall specify: ( 1 ) Terms and conditions as the Commission deems necessary and appropriate;
( 2 ) Technical specifications for operation of the manufactured reactor, as the Commission deems necessary and appropriate;
( 3 ) Site parameters and design characteristics for the manufactured reactor; and
( 4 ) The interface requirements to be met by the site-specific elements of the facility, such as the service water intake structure and the ultimate heat sink, not within the scope of the manufactured reactor.
( c ) ( 1 ) A holder of a manufacturing license may not transport or allow to be removed from the place of manufacture the manufactured reactor except to the site of a licensee with either a construction permit under part 50 of this chapter or a combined license under subpart C of this part. The construction permit or combined license must authorize the construction of a nuclear power facility using the manufactured reactor(s).
( 2 ) A holder of a manufacturing license shall include, in any contract governing the transport of a manufactured reactor from the place of manufacture to any other location, a provision requiring that the person or entity transporting the manufactured reactor to comply with all NRC-approved shipping requirements in the manufacturing license.
| (logo) WELLS            FARGO | Commercial Mortgage Servicing

D1086-120, 12th Floor

55 0 South Tryon Street

Charlotte, NC 28202

1-800-326-1334 |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

 

**A****NNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE**

 

Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of as of December 1, 2012, by and   among Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc., as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, Certificate Administrator, Tax Administrator and Custodian, Midland Loan Services, a division of PNC Bank, National Association, as Special Servicer, Pentalpha Surveillance LLC, as Trust Advisor and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates WFRBS 2012-C10 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 11.12 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1.             A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period from January 1, 2014 through December 31, 2014 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and

 

2.             To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer, has fulfilled all of its obligations under this Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 6th day of March 2015.

 

 

 

 

 

/s/  Daniel Bober            

Daniel Bober

Executive Vice President

Wells Fargo Bank

 

 

 

 
| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll go far |
|------------------------|------------------------------------|
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

FRANK DIGMAN

,

Defendant Below,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF DELAWARE,

Plaintiff Below,

Appellee. §

§ No. 594 , 2018

§

§ Court Below

— Superior Court

§ of the State of Delaware

§

§ Cr. ID No

. 1104022622 ( N )

§

§

§

§

Submitted: February 12, 2019

Decided : February 21 , 2019

O R D ER

On January 28, 2019 , the Chief Deputy Clerk issued a notice, by certified

mail, directing the appellant to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed

for the appellant's failure to file the opening brief. The appellant recei ved the notice

to show cause by February 1, 2019 but did not respond to it, and has not filed the

opening brief. D ismissal of the appeal is therefore deemed to be unopposed.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, under Supreme Court Rules 3(b)(2)

and 29(b), that the appeal is DISMISSED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ James T. Vaughn, Jr.

Justice
`[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 583 Reported in House (RH)]







                                                 House Calendar No. 127
109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 583

                          [Report No. 109-328]

 Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4340) to implement the 
              United States-Bahrain Free Trade Agreement.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            December 6, 2005

 Mr. Hastings of Washington, from the Committee on Rules, reported the 
  following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and 
                         ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION


 
 Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4340) to implement the 
              United States-Bahrain Free Trade Agreement.

    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order without intervention of any point of order to consider in the 
House the bill (H.R. 4340) to implement the United States-Bahrain Free 
Trade Agreement. The bill shall be considered as read. The bill shall 
be debatable for two hours equally divided and controlled by the 
chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on Ways and 
Means. Pursuant to section 151 of the Trade Act of 1974, the previous 
question shall be considered as ordered on the bill to final passage 
without intervening motion.
    Sec. 2. During consideration of H.R. 4340 pursuant to this 
resolution, notwithstanding the operation of the previous question, the 
Chair may postpone further consideration of the bill to a time 
designated by the Speaker in consonance with section 151 of the Trade 
Act of 1974.
                                                 House Calendar No. 127

109th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                              H. RES. 583

                          [Report No. 109-328]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4340) to implement the 
              United States-Bahrain Free Trade Agreement.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            December 6, 2005

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed`
Order entered May 20, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-00929-CV

IN RE CHUAN C. CHEN, ALBERT LUTTERODT, 

AND MPATANISHI TAYARI GARRETT, Relators

Original Proceeding from the 102nd District Court

Red River County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CV04011

ORDER

Before Justices Bridges and Brown

Before the Court is relator Albert Lutterodt’s May 14, 2019 “Emergency Motion for 

Sanctions Against David J Potter and Jackson M Potter, et al.” We DENY the motion.

/s/ DAVID L. BRIDGES 

JUSTICE
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 40 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 40

 Honoring the career and philanthropic contributions of Johnny Carson.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 25, 2005

Mr. Fortenberry (for himself, Ms. Watson, Mr. Terry, Mr. King of Iowa, 
 Mrs. Bono, Ms. Lee, Mr. Schiff, Mr. Moore of Kansas, Mr. Sherman, Mr. 
  Osborne, Mr. Hayworth, and Mr. Tom Davis of Virginia) submitted the 
following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Government 
                                 Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Honoring the career and philanthropic contributions of Johnny Carson.

Whereas Johnny Carson was born as John William Carson on October 23, 1925, in 
        Corning, Iowa, to Homer ``Kit'' and Ruth Carson;
Whereas Johnny Carson moved with his family to Norfolk, Nebraska, in 1933, 
        served his country as a Navy ensign during World War II, and received a 
        bachelor of arts degree in radio and speech in 1949 from the University 
        of Nebraska;
Whereas Johnny Carson became known as the ``King of Late Night'' as he 
        entertained millions of Americans from 1962 until 1992 as the host of 
        ``The Tonight Show'';
Whereas Johnny Carson won six Emmy Awards, was inducted into the Television Hall 
        of Fame in 1987, was awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom in 1992, 
        and received the Kennedy Center Lifetime Achievement Award in 1993;
Whereas Johnny Carson continued to recognize his Midwestern roots by generously 
        donating millions of dollars to communities and institutions in Nebraska 
        and Iowa;
Whereas the United States was saddened by the death of Johnny Carson on January 
        23, 2005, at the age of 79: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) honors Johnny Carson for making us laugh and for his 
        many philanthropic contributions; and
            (2) expresses its deepest sympathy and condolences to his 
        family.
                                 <all>
```
H. Res. 697

In the House of Representatives, U.S., 

May 2, 2006.

Whereas from February 17 to February 26, 2006, Turin, 

Italy, hosted the 2006 Olympic Winter Games; 

Whereas this is the third time Italy has hosted the Olympic 

Games, with the prior Winter Games having been held in 

1956 in Cortina d’Ampezzo and the Summer Games having been held in 1960 in Rome; 

Whereas the people of Turin and the surrounding Alpine 

areas have opened their hearts to the world, demonstrated their passions for sports, art, and culture, and 

strengthened the bonds between the city of Turin and the 

surrounding Alpine areas; 

Whereas the city of Turin accommodated nearly 2,600 athletes, more than 2,700 trainers and escorts, 18,000 volunteers, 9,500 members of the media, and nearly 

1,000,000 spectators at 7 competition sites and 3 Olympic villages; 

Whereas in light of a global terror threat, Italian authorities 

implemented extraordinary security measures and successfully coordinated the efforts of 10,000 police officers 

and 2,500 Italian military personnel, providing effective 

and efficient protection, while also ensuring a secure and 

stable environment for both athletes and spectators alike; 
2

•HRES 697 EH 

Whereas through the stewardship of the International Olympic Committee and the Torino Olympic Organizing Committee, athletes representing 80 different countries competed in 15 disciplines of winter sport with the spirit of 

mutual respect and understanding, furthering the Olympic legacy of ‘‘peace between nations, equality, fair play, 

loyalty and respect’’; 

Whereas well over 200 members of the United States Olympic Team participated in the Games and embodied the 

spirit of this Nation with resolve and determination and 

won 25 medals, including 9 gold medals; 

Whereas 477 athletes from 39 countries competed for 9 days 

in March 2006 in Turin at the 2006 Paralympic Winter 

Games, which were organized in 1948 as a venue for injured World War II veterans to compete, demonstrating 

not an individual’s disability, but rather the individual’s 

achievements in athleticism; and 

Whereas the United States Olympic Team ranked second 

among all nations in the number of medals won at the 

2006 Olympic Winter Games and the United States 

Paralympic Team ranked seventh among all nations in 

the number of medals won at the 2006 Paralympic Winter Games: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

(1) commends the people and Government of Italy, 

and specifically the people of Turin and the surrounding 

Alpine areas, the Torino Olympic Organizing Committee, 

and the International Olympic Committee on the successful completion of the 2006 Olympic Winter Games; 
3

•HRES 697 EH 

(2) congratulates the United States Olympic Committee, the 2006 United States Olympic and Paralympic 

Teams, and all international athletes for their outstanding performances at the 2006 Olympic Winter 

Games; and 

(3) expresses gratitude to the thousands of volunteers and others who made the 2006 Olympic Winter 

Games exciting, safe, and successful.

Attest: 

Clerk.
§ 603.700 Standards for purchasing systems of for-profit firms. ( a ) If the TIA is an expenditure-based award, it should require for-profit participants that currently perform under DOE assistance instruments subject to the purchasing standards in 10 CFR 600.331 to use the same requirements for the TIA, unless there are programmatic or business reasons to do otherwise (in which case the reasons must be documented in the award file).
( b ) Other for-profit participants under an expenditure-based TIA should be allowed to use their existing purchasing systems, as long as they flow down the applicable requirements in Federal statutes, Executive Orders or Government-wide regulations (see Appendices A and B to this part for a list of those requirements).
PGI 252.103 Identification of provisions and clauses.       (c) Local provisions and clauses developed by departments and agencies for a single-use intended to meet the needs of an individual acquisition shall be identified by the title, date, and name of the department or agency that developed the local clause. For example, if “X” Agency negotiated a single-use clause for use of special government facilities during discussions, such clause would be identified in the contract as follows:          “Special Use of Government Facilities (DATE) X Agency”          (d)(1)(A) Local provisions and clauses that will be used on a repetitive basis shall be identified by—          (*1*) The chapter assigned to the department or agency under Title 48 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR);          (*2*) FAR subpart “52.2”;          (*3*) The applicable FAR part;          (*4*) A four-digit sequential number in the 9000 series for the suffix (see DFARS 252.101(b)(2)(ii)(B));          (*5*) Title; and          (*6*) Date.          (B) For example, if “Y” Agency is assigned a CFR chapter number 99, and has developed a provision regarding an evaluation factor for past performance to be used on a repetitive basis in negotiated acquisitions, such provision would be identified as follows:          “9952.215-9XXX Past Performance Evaluation Factor (DATE)”    **Parent topic:** PGI 252.1 -INSTRUCTIONS FOR USING PROVISIONS AND CLAUSES
# EUR-Lex - 31985R2249 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31985R2249

**Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2249/85 of 2 August 1985 amending Regulation No 467/67/EEC fixing the conversion rates, the processing costs and the value of the by-products for the various stages of rice processing **

*
Official Journal L 210 , 07/08/1985 P. 0013 - 0013 Finnish special edition: Chapter 3 Volume 19 P. 0066 Spanish special edition: Chapter 03 Volume 36 P. 0239 Swedish special edition: Chapter 3 Volume 19 P. 0066 Portuguese special edition Chapter 03 Volume 36 P. 0239 *

*****

COMMISSION REGULATION (EEC) No 2249/85

of 2 August 1985

amending Regulation No 467/67/EEC fixing the conversion rates, the processing costs and the value of the by-products for the various stages of rice processing

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN

COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 1418/76 of 21 June 1976 on the common organization of the market in rice (1), as last amended by Regulation (EEC) No 1025/84 (2), and in particular Article 19 thereof,

Whereas Article 2 (1) and (2) of Commission Regulation No 467/67/EEC (3), as last amended by Regulation (EEC) No 1548/84 (4), fixed the processing costs to be taken into consideration for certain processing stages; whereas, as a result of changes in prices, processing costs for these stages have also changed and these changes should be taken into account;

Whereas the measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Cereals,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

In Article 2 (1) and (2) of Regulation No 467/67/EEC, '45,00 ECU' is hereby replaced by '47,13 ECU'.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 1 September 1985.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 2 August 1985.

For the Commission

The President

Jacques DELORS

(1) OJ No L 166, 25. 6. 1976, p. 1.

(2) OJ No L 107, 19. 1. 1984, p. 13.

(3) OJ No L 204, 24. 8. 1967, p. 1.

(4) OJ No L 148, 5. 6. 1984, p. 16.
#### § 706.12 Administrative Law Judges.

By agreement with the National Labor Relations Board, a panel of cleared NLRB administrative law judges is maintained to facilitate resolution of questions as to the materiality of classified information in NLRB hearings and to facilitate preparation of an unclassified record. The assignment of individual administrative law judges to DOE cases remains a matter within the discretion of the National Labor Relations Board.
2401.603-3 Appointment.

(a) Appointments to officials not expressly delegated procurement authority by a published

departmental delegation of authority shall be made in writing by the Head of the Contracting

Activity. The Certificate of Appointment (SF 1402) shall constitute the appointing official's

determination that the appointee meets the selection requirements set forth at 2401.603-2.

Parent topic: Subpart 2401.6 - Career Development, Contracting Authority, and Responsibilities
#### § 707.17 Permissible actions in the event of contractor noncompliance.

Actions available to DOE in the event of contractor noncompliance with the provisions of this part or otherwise performing in a manner inconsistent with its approved program include, but are not limited to, suspension or debarment, contract termination, or reduction in fee in accordance with the contract terms.
§ 20.1902 Posting requirements. ( a ) *Posting of radiation areas.* The licensee shall post each radiation area with a conspicuous sign or signs bearing the radiation symbol and the words “CAUTION, RADIATION AREA.”
( b ) *Posting of high radiation areas.* The licensee shall post each high radiation area with a conspicuous sign or signs bearing the radiation symbol and the words “CAUTION, HIGH RADIATION AREA” or “DANGER, HIGH RADIATION AREA.”
( c ) *Posting of very high radiation areas.* The licensee shall post each very high radiation area with a conspicuous sign or signs bearing the radiation symbol and words “GRAVE DANGER, VERY HIGH RADIATION AREA.”
( d ) *Posting of airborne radioactivity areas.* The licensee shall post each airborne radioactivity area with a conspicuous sign or signs bearing the radiation symbol and the words “CAUTION, AIRBORNE RADIOACTIVITY AREA” or “DANGER, AIRBORNE RADIOACTIVITY AREA.”
( e ) *Posting of areas or rooms in which licensed material is used or stored.* The licensee shall post each area or room in which there is used or stored an amount of licensed material exceeding 10 times the quantity of such material specified in appendix C to part 20 with a conspicuous sign or signs bearing the radiation symbol and the words “CAUTION, RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL(S)” or “DANGER, RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL(S).”
[56 FR 23401, May 21, 1991, as amended at 60 FR 20185, Apr. 25, 1995]
#### E. William Miller, Jr., Respondent, v. Harold Korman, Appellant, and James R. Lawley et al., Constituting the Board of Elections of Erie County, Respondents.

Order unanimously affirmed, without costs. (Order entered June 9, 1969.) (Appeal from order of Erie Special Term invalidating petition.) Present — Del Yecchio, J. P., Witmer, Gabrielli, Bastow and Henry, JJ.
§ 708.21 Referral to the Office of Hearings and Appeals. ( a ) If a complaint is not dismissed for lack of jurisdiction or other good cause, the Head of Field Element or EC Director (as applicable) will forward the complaint to the OHA Director by the later of: ( 1 ) The 25th day after receipt of the employer's response, or
( 2 ) The 5th day after receipt of an order to continue processing the complaint following an appeal of dismissal.
( b ) The Head of the Field Element or EC Director (as applicable) will notify all parties that the complaint has been referred to the Office of Hearings and Appeals.
( c ) The OHA Director and an Administrative Judge appointed to preside over any aspect of a part 708 proceeding are prohibited, beginning with the complaint's referral to the OHA and until a final agency decision is issued, from initiating or otherwise engaging in *ex parte* discussions with any party on the merits of the complaint.
( d ) In all proceedings under this subpart: ( 1 ) The parties have the right to be represented by a person of their choosing or to proceed without representation. The parties are responsible for producing witnesses on their behalf, including requesting the issuance of subpoenas, if necessary;
( 2 ) Formal rules of evidence do not apply, but the OHA may use the Federal Rules of Evidence as a guide.
Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of BNP Residential Properties, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Philip S. Payne, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.





  /s/ Philip S. Payne
--------------------------------------------

Philip S. Payne

Executive Vice President and

Chief Financial Officer



November 11, 2002




                                       32
<PAGE>