alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
PGI PART 53 – FORMS       PGI SUBPART 53.90 – FORMATS AND TEMPLATES                                                         PGI 53.9000 Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) Marking.    PGI SUBPART 53.90 – FORMATS AND TEMPLATES    *(Added January 11, 2022 in accordance with through PROCLTR 2022-03)* PGI 53.9000 Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) Marking.    (a) The originator of a communication or documentation is responsible for determining, at the time of creation, whether information in a communication or documentation falls into a CUI category.Controlled by: [Name of DoD Component determining that the information is CUI] (*This should normally be DLA and MSC name. Omit this if using memo with DLA or DLA procuring organization letterhead.*)                         Controlled by: [Name of Office making the CUI determination] (*This is typically the procuring organization sublevel/branch name or code.*)                         CUI Category: [List category or categories of CUI] (*The most common categories are General Procurement, Source Selection, and Privacy; however, others may apply (e.g., General Proprietary Business Information, Legal Privilege.). Documents marked for the CUI Category - Source Selection still require markings IAW FAR 3.104-4(c). The top and bottom of each page must also be marked “Source Selection Information - See FAR 2.101 and 3.104”.*)                         Distribution/Dissemination Control: [Include Limited Dissemination Control of who can view the document] (*In most cases use “FED ONLY” for internal documents and emails. Use “FEDCON” for emails and other correspondence with contractors. The CUI Limited Dissemination Controls list in DLAI 5200.48 includes all available options.)*                         POC: [Email address or phone number of document originator](b) Contracting Officers may access the following resources and training material for additional guidance:       (1) DoDI 5200.48 Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) (https://dlamil.dps.mil/sites/Intelligence/PublishingImages/cui/DoDI%205200.48%20-%20Controlled%20Unclassified%20Information%20%28CUI%29%20%28002%29.pdf).       (2) DLAI 5200.48, Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) (https://dlamil.dps.mil/sites/Intelligence/Shared%20Documents/DLAI%205200.48%20CUI.pdf).       (3) DLA Intelligence CUI Resources(https://dlamil.dps.mil/sites/Intelligence/cui).       (4) CUI Categories | National Archives (https://www.bing.com/search?q=categories%3A+https%3A%2F%2Fwww.archives.gov%2Fcui%2Fregistry%2Fcategorylist&src=IE-SearchBox&FORM=IESR3N)       (5) DoD CUI Training (PowerPoint) (https://www.dodcui.mil/Portals/109/Documents/Training%20Docs/21-S-0588%20cleared%20CUI%20Awareness%20Training%20Nov%202020.pdf?ver=eOMZuMPrdLXcnhS6egUe2w%3d%3d)(see pages 21 through 24 for examples of markings).
**EXHIBIT 34.3**

**Independent Auditor’s Report**

The Board of Directors 

Perpetual Trustee Company Limited: 

We haveexamined management’s assessment, included in the accompanying Report on Assessment of Compliance with Regulation AB servicing criteria, that Perpetual Trustee Company Limited (the “Company”) complied with the servicing criteria setforth in Item 1122(d)(2)(ii), 1122(d)(3)(ii), 1122(d)(3)(iii) and 1122(d)(3)(iv) of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB for asset-backed securities transactions for which the Company served as issuer trustee that arebacked by the same asset type backing the class of asset-backed securities of the SMART ABS Series 2013-1US Trust (the Platform), as of 31 March 2013 and for the period from 23 January 2013 (the date of issuance of the SMART ABS Series2013-1US Trust transaction subject to the requirements of Regulation AB) through 31 March 2013 (the “Reporting Period”). The Company’s management has determined that all other criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) are notapplicable to the Company because the Company does not perform activities with respect to the Platform relating to those criteria. Management is responsible for the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is toexpress an opinion on management’s assessment about the Company’s compliance based on our examination. 

Ourexamination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the servicingcriteria specified above and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing selected asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing selected servicingactivities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the servicing criteria. Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the selectedtransactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to determine whether errors may have occurred either prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affectedthe balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Ourexamination does not provide a legal determination on the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria. 

In our opinion,management’s assessment that Perpetual Trustee Company Limited complied with the aforementioned servicing criteria as of 31 March 2013 and for the Reporting Period is fairly stated, in all material respects. 

/s/ KPMG 

KPMG 

Sydney, Australia 

5 June 2013
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q
FOR THE PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                             476
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   22,009
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,238
<INVENTORY>                                      2,812
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                44,794
<PP&E>                                          13,632
<DEPRECIATION>                                  10,062
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 155,072
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           54,447
<BONDS>                                         43,428
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         27
<COMMON>                                           120
<OTHER-SE>                                      67,794
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   155,072
<SALES>                                         29,595
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                29,595
<CGS>                                           23,460
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   23,460
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,958
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   219
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 704
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,254
<INCOME-TAX>                                       792
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,292
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,292
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.11
        

</TABLE>
BOARD RESOLUTION

REQUESTING GUARANTEED FEDERAL FINANCING BANK (FFB) LOAN

WHEREAS, it has been determined on the basis of the current Construction Work Plan that financing is needed for electric facilities as shown on RUS Form 740c, Cost Estimates and Loan Budget for Electric Borrowers, as follows:

RUS Guaranteed Federal Financing Bank (FFB) Loan Requested for Facilities         [$              ]

NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that [insert name of borrower] makes application to the Rural Utilities Service pursuant to 7 CFR Part 1710 for a guaranteed FFB loan in the approximate amount of [$ ] to be used in accordance with the provisions of 7 CFR Part 1710 to finance the above mentioned facilities.

BE IT ALSO RESOLVED, that the RUS guaranteed FFB loan shall bear a maturity date to cover an 

approximate period of [insert the term of the loan]

.

BE IT ALSO RESOLVED, that the Board of Directors of [insert name of borrower] authorizes its officers to execute and attest all necessary papers, documents, and applications related to the foregoing.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that [title(s) of corporate official(s) authorized, and any official(s) authorized to act in such corporate position(s) and to perform the functions of such positions(s)] (is/are) authorized on behalf of the Borrower (a) to execute and deliver from time to time advance reqests, maturity extension election notices, prepayment election notices and refinancing election notices, in the form of such instruments attached to the note payable to FFB, and (b) to specify information and select option as provided in such instruments.

�

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the (insert name of applicant) hereby authorizes the RUS to release appropriate information and data relating to the application to the FFB and any existing supplemental lenders.

I, [insert applicable name], Secretary of [insert name of borrower], do hereby certify that the above is a true and correct copy of a resolution adopted at the meeting of the Board of Directors of [insert name of borrower] on [insert date], at which a quorum was present and voted.

	SEAL		

		[insert applicable name], Secretary
**Nevada**

**Nevada 21 SPPCO**
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16

- 40944 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
MANUEL RIOS

- OJEDA, also known as Jose Ortiz

- Villarreal, also known as Victor Flores

- Huerta, also known as Ulises Garrido

- Zambudio , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:16

- CR

- 74

- 1

Before JOLLY, PRADO, 

### and SOUTHWICK , Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Manuel Rios

- Ojeda raises an argument that is foreclosed by United States v. Rodriguez

- Salazar , 768 F.3d 437 (5th Cir. 2014). In Rodriguez

- Salazar , 768 F.3d at 437

- 38, we rejected the argument that the Texas offense of theft is broader than the generic, contemporary definition of theft because the Texas offense, which includes

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances se t forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED February 21, 2017 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 16-40944 Document: 00513882987 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/21/2017No. 16

- 40944

2 theft by deception, may be committed by taking property with the owner’s consent. Accordingly, the motion for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. Case: 16-40944 Document: 00513882987 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/21/2017
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1176 Reported in House (RH)]

<DOC>

                                                 House Calendar No. 196
115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1176

                         [Report No. 115-1074]

 Providing for consideration of the conference report to accompany the 
      bill (H.R. 2) to provide for the reform and continuation of 
   agricultural and other programs of the Department of Agriculture 
           through fiscal year 2023, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 11, 2018

   Mr. Newhouse, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Providing for consideration of the conference report to accompany the 
      bill (H.R. 2) to provide for the reform and continuation of 
   agricultural and other programs of the Department of Agriculture 
           through fiscal year 2023, and for other purposes.

    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order to consider the conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 2) 
to provide for the reform and continuation of agricultural and other 
programs of the Department of Agriculture through fiscal year 2023, and 
for other purposes. All points of order against the conference report 
and against its consideration are waived. The conference report shall 
be considered as read. The previous question shall be considered as 
ordered on the conference report to its adoption without intervening 
motion except: (1) one hour of debate; and (2) one motion to recommit 
if applicable.
    Sec. 2.  The provisions of section 7 of the War Powers Resolution 
(50 U.S.C. 1546) shall not apply during the remainder of the One 
Hundred Fifteenth Congress to a concurrent resolution introduced 
pursuant to section 5 of the War Powers Resolution (50 U.S.C. 1544) 
with respect to the Republic of Yemen.
                                                 House Calendar No. 196

115th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                              H. RES. 1176

                         [Report No. 115-1074]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 Providing for consideration of the conference report to accompany the 
      bill (H.R. 2) to provide for the reform and continuation of 
   agricultural and other programs of the Department of Agriculture 
           through fiscal year 2023, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           December 11, 2018

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications.

 

 

I, Helaine M. Kaplan, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-Drequired to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of the COMM 2013-CCRE6 Mortgage Trust (the "ExchangeAct periodic reports");

 

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as awhole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered bythis report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other informationrequired to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements requiredin this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers havefulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and

 

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteriafor asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backedsecurities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances ofnoncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on informationprovided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:

 

Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, Midland LoanServices, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, as Special Servicer, U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, Park BridgeLender Services LLC, as Operating Advisor, CoreLogic Commercial Real Estate Services, Inc., as Servicing Function Participant,National Tax Search, LLC, as Servicing Function Participant, Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association,as Primary Servicer for the Moffett Towers Mortgage Loan, Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as Special Servicer for the Moffett TowersMortgage Loan, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee for the Moffett Towers Mortgage Loan, Wells Fargo Bank, NationalAssociation, as Custodian for the Moffett Towers Mortgage Loan, and Park Bridge Lender Services LLC, as Operating Advisor for theMoffett Towers Mortgage Loan.

 

 

 

Dated: March 19, 2020

 

 

/s/ Helaine M. Kaplan

 

 

President

(senior officer in charge of securitization ofthe depositor)
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION

CALVIN FLUKER, et al, )

)

Plaintiffs, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

v. ) 2:06cv785-MHT

) 

U.S. FOODSERVICE, INC., )

and U.S. FOODSERVICE, INC.- )

Montgomery Division, )

)

Defendants. )

ORDER

It is ORDERED that the joint motion to extend

deadlines (Doc. No. 56) is granted as requested.

DONE, this the 7th day of December, 2007.

 /s/ Myron H. Thompson 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00785-MHT-WC Document 57 Filed 12/07/2007 Page 1 of 1
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 99 

To amend the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 to 

provide for the eligibility of Transportation Security Administration employees to receive public safety officers’ death benefits, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 3, 2017 

Ms. BROWNLEY of California introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets 

Act of 1968 to provide for the eligibility of Transportation Security Administration employees to receive public safety officers’ death benefits, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Honoring Our Fallen 

5 TSA Officers Act’’. 


smartinez on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 99 IH

1 SEC. 2. TRANSPORTATION SECURITY ADMINISTRATION EM2 PLOYEES ELIGIBLE TO RECEIVE PUBLIC 

3 SAFETY OFFICERS’ DEATH BENEFITS. 

4 Section 1204(9) of the Omnibus Crime Control and 

5 Safe Streets Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 3796b(9)) is amend6 ed— 

7 (1) in subparagraph (C), by striking ‘‘or’’ at 

8 the end; 

9 (2) in subparagraph (D), by striking the period 

10 at the end and inserting ‘‘; or’’; and 

11 (3) by inserting after subparagraph (D) the fol12 lowing: 

13 ‘‘(E) an employee of the Transportation 

14 Security Administration who is performing offi15 cial duties of the Administration, if those offi16 cial duties are related to protecting the Nation’s 

17 transportation systems to ensure freedom of 

18 movement for people and commerce.’’. 

19 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

20 This Act and the amendments made by this Act shall 

21 take effect as if they had been enacted on October 31, 

22 2013. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
###### Editorial Note on Part 61

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 61 appear at 80 FR 74980, Dec. 1, 2015, and at 81 FR 86909, Dec. 2, 2016.

#### § 61.40 General requirement.

Land disposal facilities must be sited, designed, operated, closed, and controlled after closure so that reasonable assurance exists that exposures to humans are within the limits established in the performance objectives in §§ 61.41 through 61.44.
IV 

House Calendar No. 25 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 221 

[Report No. 115–56] 

Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on Rules, and 

providing for consideration of motions to suspend the rules. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 22, 2017 

Mr. SESSIONS, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

RESOLUTION 

Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with 

respect to consideration of certain resolutions reported 

from the Committee on Rules, and providing for consideration of motions to suspend the rules. 

1 Resolved, That the requirement of clause 6(a) of rule 

2 XIII for a two-thirds vote to consider a report from the 

3 Committee on Rules on the same day it is presented to 

4 the House is waived with respect to any resolution re5 ported through the legislative day of March 27, 2017. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 221 RH 

1 SEC. 2. It shall be in order at any time through the 

2 calendar day of March 26, 2017, for the Speaker to enter3 tain motions that the House suspend the rules as though 

4 under clause 1 of rule XV. The Speaker or his designee 

5 shall consult with the Minority Leader or her designee on 

6 the designation of any matter for consideration pursuant 

7 to this section. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS

SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
House Calendar No. 25 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 221 

[Report No. 115–56] 

RESOLUTION 

Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII 

the rules. providing for consideration of motions to suspend tions reported from the Committee on Rules, and with respect to consideration of certain resoluMARCH 22, 2017 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### In the Matter of Elisa Samson et al., Appellants, v County of Nassau et al., Respondents.

a proceeding pursuant to section 50-e of the General Municipal Law for leave to serve a late notice of claim, petitioners appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated February 22, 1980, which denied their motion "for leave to renew” a prior order of the same court, dated January 11, 1980, which had denied their application. Appeal dismissed, without costs or disbursements. Petitioners’ motion for renewal was, in reality, a motion for reargument, as no new matter was presented therein which was unavailable to the petitioners prior to the order dated January 11, 1980 (see *Matter of Dowling v Bowen,*53 AD2d 862, mot for lv to app den 40 NY2d 806; see, also, *Foley v Roche,*68 AD2d 558, 568). It is axiomatic that an order denying a motion for leave to reargue is not appealable. Damiani, J. P., Gulotta, Martuscello and O’Connor, JJ., concur.