alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# EUR-Lex - 31980L0368 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31980L0368

**Eleventh Council Directive 80/368/EEC of 26 March 1980 on the harmonization of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes - exclusion of the French overseas departments from the scope of Directive 77/388/EEC **

*
Official Journal L 090 , 03/04/1980 P. 0041 - 0041 Finnish special edition: Chapter 1 Volume 2 P. 0003 Greek special edition: Chapter 09 Volume 1 P. 0120 Swedish special edition: Chapter 1 Volume 2 P. 0003 Spanish special edition: Chapter 09 Volume 1 P. 0125 Portuguese special edition Chapter 09 Volume 1 P. 0125 *

ELEVENTH COUNCIL DIRECTIVE of 26 March 1980 on the harmonization of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes - exclusion of the French overseas departments from the scope of Directive 77/388/EEC (80/368/EEC)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community, and in particular Articles 99 and 100 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the Commission,

Whereas the third subparagraph of Article 227 (2) of the Treaty requires that the institutions of the Community should, within the framework of the procedures provided for in the Treaty, take care that the economic and social development of the French overseas departments is possible;

Whereas, in accordance with the judgment handed down by the Court of Justice on 10 October 1978 in Case 148/77, the Treaty and secondary legislation apply in the French overseas departments unless a decision is taken by the Community institutions adopting measures particularly suited to the economic and social conditions of those departments;

Whereas, for reasons connected with their geographic, economic and social situation, the French overseas departments should be excluded from the scope of the common system of value added tax as established by Council Directive 77/388/EEC (1);

Whereas implementation of this Directive does not involve any amendment of the laws of the Member States,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DIRECTIVE:

Article 1

The following indent shall be added to Article 3 (2) of Directive 77/388/EEC:

"- French Republic: - the overseas departements."

Article 2

This Directive shall apply with effect from 1 January 1979.

Article 3

This Directive is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 26 March 1980.

For the Council

The President

G. MARCORA (1)OJ No L 145, 13.6.1977, p. 1.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Federal Highway Administration

# AGENCY:

Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), DOT.

# ACTION:

Rescind Notice of Intent to prepare an EIS.

# SUMMARY:

                        This notice rescinds the Notice of Intent for preparing an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for proposed highway, State Route 15, to provide a connection between Interstate 10 and U.S. 98 near Beaumont, Harrison, George, Greene, Jackson, Perry, and Stone Counties, Mississippi. The original Notice of Intent for this EIS process was published in the                         **Federal Register**                         on May 28, 2009.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Claiborne Barnwell, Project Development Team Leader, Federal Highway Administration, Mississippi                               ( print page 81710)                            Division, 100 West Capitol Street, Suite 1026, Jackson, Mississippi 39269,                         *Telephone:*                         (601) 965-4217.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

## Background

The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) in cooperation with the Mississippi Department of Transportation (MDOT) initiated an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) with a Notice of Intent May 28, 2009, to provide a connector road between Interstate 10 and U.S. 98.

Due to funding constraints this Notice of Intent is rescinded.

 Andrew H. Hughes,

Division Administrator, Mississippi Federal Highway Administration, Jackson, Mississippi.

[FR Doc. 2010-32422 Filed 12-27-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE M
#### § 503.4 Purpose and scope.

This subpart establishes the general requirements necessary to qualify for either a temporary or permanent exemption under this part and sets out the methodology for calculating the cost of using an alternate fuel and the cost of using imported petroleum.
### EPA Form 5900-06 OMB No. 2060-0336, Approval Expires 06/30/2015 

### Federal Operating Permit Pr ogram (40 CFR Part 71)

FEE FILING FORM (FF)

Complete this form each time you prepare form FEE and send this form to the appropriate lockbox bank

address, along with full payment. This form required at time of initial fee payment, and thereafter, when

paying annual fees.

Source or Facility Name_ Anadarko Petroleum Cor poration – Blackhawk EGOM Exploratory Project

Source Location Refer to Section 1.1 of the attached application.

EPA Region where Source Located 4

Mailing Address:

Street/P.O. Box __1201 Lake Robbins Drive City___ The Woodlands

State __TX____ ZIP _77380_ - ______

Contact Person: Kathryn Maness Title _Sr. Staff EHS Representative

Telephone (832) 636 – 2582 Ext. __________

Total Fee Payment Remitted : $ 58,558
§ 503.7 State approval—general requirement for new powerplants. ( a ) Where approvals by the appropriate State regulatory authority are required prior to the construction or use of a new powerplant, a petition for an exemption for consideration by OFE may be submitted to OFE prior to obtaining such approvals from the State regulatory authority.
( b ) An exemption granted for a powerplant shall not become effective until an adequate demonstration has been made to OFE that all applicable approvals required by the State regulatory authorities have been obtained.
#### § 708.40 Notice of program requirements.

Employers who are covered by this part must inform their employees about these regulations by posting notices in conspicuous places at the work site. These notices must include the name, address, telephone number, and website or email address of the DOE office where employees can file complaints under this part.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

GREAT AMERICAN INS. CO., § 

 § 

 Plaintiff, § 

 § 

v. § Case No. 2:06mc-03334-MHT 

 § 

CHARLES H. STEPHENS, et al., § 

 § 

 Defendants. § 

PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF SATISFACTION OF JUDGMENT 

Great American Insurance Company hereby notifies this Court and all other 

affected persons, entities and parties, that the judgment in the amount of 

$761,615.81 entered in favor of Great American Insurance Company and against 

the Defendants, Charles H. Stephens, Floy Stephens, Gary L. Bennett, and Kay 

Bennett, entered by the United States District Court of the Eastern District of 

Pennsylvania on August 9, 2006, and subsequently registered in this Court on 

August 23, 2006, has been paid and satisfied in full effective this the 26th day of 

February, 2008. 

 /s/ R. Cooper Shattuck 

R. Cooper Shattuck (SHATR-5109) 

Attorney for Plaintiff, Great American 

Insurance Company 

Case 2:06-mc-03334-MHT Document 13-2 Filed 02/27/2008 Page 1 of 3
OF COUNSEL: 

ROSEN HARWOOD, P.A. 

2117 Jack Warner Parkway 

Post Office Box 2727 

Tuscaloosa, Alabama 35403 

Telephone: (205) 344-5000 

Facsimile: (205) 758-8358 

\\server2k3\vol1\frances\shattuck\gaic\bennett - stephens\collection on judgment\pleadings\word pleading drafts\satisfaction of judgment middle district.doc 

Case 2:06-mc-03334-MHT Document 13-2 Filed 02/27/2008 Page 2 of 3
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that I have served a copy of the foregoing on the following 

parties in this proceeding by mailing same by United States mail, properly 

addressed and first class postage prepaid, and/or sent electronically via the 

CM/ECF system on this 27th day of February, 2008. 

Armen Shahinian 

Robert T. Carlton, Jr. 

Wolff & Samson PC 

One Boland Drive 

West Orange, NJ 07052 

Travis Kreiser 

Ewing & Kreiser PC 

500 Fayette Street #201 

Conshohocken, PA 19428 

Henry J. Costa, Jr. 

Flamm Boroff Bacine PC 

925 Harvest Drive, Suite 220 

Blue Bell, PA 19422 

Richard J. Joyce 

Reager & Adler PC 

2331 Market Street 

Camp Hill, PA 17011 

Gary L. Bennett 

3301 Afton Way 

Birmingham, AL 35242 

Kay Bennett 

3301 Afton Way 

Birmingham, AL 35242 

 /s/ R. Cooper Shattuck 

R. Cooper Shattuck (SHATR-5109) 

Case 2:06-mc-03334-MHT Document 13-2 Filed 02/27/2008 Page 3 of 3
EX‐35.12 

 
| (logo) WELLS            FARGO | **Corporate Trust Services** MAC R1204-010 9062 Old Annapolis Road

Columbia, MD 21045

 

Tel:  410 884 2000

Fax: 410 715 2380 |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

 

Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation

60 Wall Street

New York, NY 10005

 

 

RE: Annual Statement of Compliance

 

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Certificate Administrator and Paying Agent for the Harmon Corner Loan Combination (in such capacities, “Wells Fargo”), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2014 (the “reporting period”):

 

 

(a)      A review of Wells Fargo's activities during the reporting period and of its performance under the applicable servicing agreement(s) listed on Schedule A hereto (the “Servicing Agreement(s)”) has been made under my supervision; and

 

(b)     To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement(s) in all material respects throughout the reporting period, except as noted on Schedule B.

 

 

 

March 4, 2015

 

 

/s/ Brian Smith

Brian Smith

Vice President

 

 

To: Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation

Schedule A

 

 

**List****of Servicing Agreement(s) and Series**

 

 

1.        Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of December 1, 2012, by and among DEUTSCHE MORTGAGE & ASSET RECEIVING CORPORATION, as Depositor, MIDLAND LOAN SERVICES, A DIVISION OF PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, MIDLAND LOAN SERVICES, A DIVISION OF PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Special Servicer, and PARK BRIDGE LENDER SERVICES, LLC, as Operating Advisor and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as Certificate Administrator, Paying Agent, Trustee and Custodian relating to the Series COMM 2012-CCRE5 Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates relating to the Harmon Corner Loan Combination, a pari passu portion of which is included in the Series COMM 2013-LC6 Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates transaction.

 

 

 

 

To: Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation

 

Schedule B

 

 

Material Non-Compliance with Servicing Obligations

 

Not Applicable
# PGI 244.2 -CONSENT TO SUBCORACTNT

**Parent topic:**PGI Part 244 - SUBCONTRACTING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES

## PGI 244.201 Consent and advance notification requirements.

### PGI 244.201-1 Consent requirements.

When contracting for a covered system or covered item of supply, work with the requiring activity to determine if, based on the criticality of the component or system to be supplied and potential concerns about supply chain risk, written consent to subcontract by the contracting officer is necessary when subcontractors are selected or modified during the course of contract performance.  Should the requiring activity conclude that a potential subcontractor is beyond the risk tolerance of the system and mission, the requiring activity must inform the contracting officer and the authority granted in section 806 of Pub. L. 111-383 may be used to withhold consent for the contractor to subcontract with a particular source or exclude a source from consideration as specified in DFARS 239.73.
(PRINT ON BORROWER’S LETTERHEAD)

The following statement and certification will become a part of your application currently on file for a loan from the Rural Utilities Service and/or the Rural Telephone Bank.

FEDERAL DEBT DELINQUENCY CERTIFICATION

IS THE APPLICANT DELINQUENT ON ANY FEDERAL DEBT?	 YES  		NO

Note:	Example of debts include, but are not limited to, delinquent taxes, guaranteed or direct government loans (more than 31 days past due) and other administrative debts.

If Yes, provide explanatory information.

APPLICANT CERTIFICATION

FEDERAL COLLECTION POLICIES FOR COMMERCIAL DEBT

The Federal Government is authorized by law to take any or all of the following actions in the event that a borrower’s loan payments become delinquent or the borrower defaults on its loan:  (1)  Report the borrower’s delinquent account to a credit bureau;  (2)  Assess additional interest and penalty charges for the period of time that payment is not made;  (3)  Assess charges to cover additional administrative costs incurred by the Government to service the borrower’s account;  (4)  Offset amounts owed to the borrower under other Federal programs;  (5)  Refer the borrower’s debt to the Internal Revenue Service for offset against any amount owed to the borrower as an income tax refund;  (6)  Refer the borrower’s account to a private collection agency to collect the amount due;  and  (7)  Refer the borrower’s account to the Department of Justice for litigation in the courts.

All of these actions can and will be used to recover any debts owed when it is determined to be in the interest of the Government to do so.

Certification

I have read and understand the actions the Federal Government can take in the event that I fail to meet my scheduled payments in accordance with the terms and conditions of my agreements.

					Signed:	     					

					Title:	     	President			

					Company:   					

					Date:	    					

DEBTDELQ.DOC (Computer generated form, Version 2, 12/96)
Exhibit 35.1



AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE CORPORATION

ANNUAL COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE

PURSUANT TO SECTION 3.11(a) OF THE

SALE AND SERVICING AGREEMENT AND

ITEM 1123 OF REGULATION AB



I, Paul C. Honda, do
hereby certify that I am the Vice President and Assistant Secretary of American Honda Finance Corporation, a California corporation
(the “Company”), and further certify on behalf of the Company in its capacity as servicer (the “Servicer”
and “Sponsor”) under the Sale and Servicing Agreement (the “Agreement”) dated as of January 23, 2013 among
the Servicer and Sponsor, American Honda Receivables LLC, as Seller, and Honda Auto Receivables 2013-1 Owner Trust, as follows:



| | (i) | A review of the activities of the Servicer during the reporting period ended March 31, 2016, and of its performance under the
Agreement has been made under my supervision.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations
under the Agreement throughout such period in all material respects.
| | ---- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this
16th day of May, 2016.



| | /s/ Paul C. Honda                                    | 
| | ---------------------------------------------------- | 
| | Paul C. Honda                                        | 
| | Vice President and Assistant Secretary               | 
| | (senior officer in charge of the servicing function) |
```

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                                  CERTIFICATION
                           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Perkins Oil & Gas, Inc.
(the "Company") for the year ended June 30, 2015, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Betty N. Myers, as
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-OxLey Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Date: July 26, 2016                   By: /s/ Betty N. Myers
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Betty N. Myers
                                          Chief Executive Officer

This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of ss.18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```
#### Thana Skouras et al., Respondents, v. C. Russell Feldmann, Appellant.

Order entered on January 14, 1969, unanimously affirmed, with $30 costs and disbursements to the respondents, on the memorandum decision at Special Term. Examination is to be held on 10 days’ written notice as to time and place, or such other time and place as may be agreed to by the parties. No opinion. Concur—Eager, J. P., MeGivern, Markewich, Nunez and McNally, JJ.
#### Richard STRONG *v.*STATE of Arkansas

CR 06-1346

257 S.W.3d 80

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Opinion delivered May 17, 2007

*Randel Miller,*for appellant.

No response.

Per Curiam.

On April 20, 2007, Randel Miller, attorney for Appellant Richard Strong, filed a second motion to withdraw or, in the alternative, a motion for extension of time to file a brief. In his motion, Miller claimed that “a conflict has recently *88arisen between counsel and [Appellant]” that would require his withdrawal from the case. Miller stated that Appellant filed a complaint against him with the Committee on Professional Conduct, but Miller did not attach such an exhibit to his motion. Miller now requests that we grant his motion to withdraw.

Rule 16 of the Rules of Appellate Procedure - Criminal provides:

> (a) Trial counsel, whether retained or court appointed, shall continue to represent a convicted defendant throughout any appeal to the Arkansas Supreme Court, unless permitted by the trial court to withdraw in the interest of justice or for other sufficient cause. After the notice of appeal of a judgment of conviction has been filed, the Supreme Court shall have exclusive jurisdiction to relieve counsel and appoint new counsel.

The United States Supreme Court recognized in *Holloway v. Arkansas,*435 U.S. 475 (1978), that defense counsel is in the best position professionally and ethically to determine when a conflict of interest exists or will probably develop in the course of a trial. The Supreme Court also stated in *Holloway*that defense attorneys have the obligation to advise the court at once upon discovering a conflict of interest. *See id.*

Here, we grant Miller’s motion for extension of time to file a brief and order him to file a brief within thirty days. We deny Miller’s motion to withdraw at this time. However, we will consider a subsequent motion to withdraw if an entry of appearance of new counsel, an affidavit of indigency, or a petition to appear pro se are submitted simultaneously with a motion to withdraw. These motions must be filed within thirty days of this order.

Motion to withdraw denied; motion for extension of time granted.
PGI 242.7401 Procedures.

(1) When the program, project, or system manager determines that a technical representative is

required, the manager shall issue a letter of intent to the contract administration office commander

listing the assignment location, starting and ending assignment dates, technical duties assigned,

delegated authority, and support required from the contract administration office. Any issues

regarding the assignment of a technical representative should be resolved promptly. However, final

decision on the assignment remains with the program manager. Issues regarding the assignment of

technical duties that cannot be resolved between the program office and the on-site DoD contract

administration office will be elevated.

(2) The program, project, or system manager will furnish the designated technical representative a

letter of assignment of delegated technical duties, with copies to the contract administration office,

the contracting officer, and the contractor, at least 30 days before the assignment date (or

termination date). Any changes to the requirements of the assignment letter will be made by a new

letter of intent and processed in accordance with paragraph (1) of this section.

(3) The contract administration office normally provides the technical representative with office

space, equipment, supplies, and part-time clerical support. The program, project, or system manager

provides supervision, technical direction, administrative services (e.g., pay, travel, maintenance of

personnel records), and, when required, full-time clerical support.

(4) The program manager or designee and the contract administration office, at the local level, shall

negotiate a memorandum of agreement (MOA) delineating their functional administrative

interrelationships, with annual updates as necessary. The agreements may be included in an existing

MOA, if one exists, or as a separate MOA.

(5) The technical representative shall keep the contract administration office commander fully

informed of matters discussed with the contractor. The contract administration office shall also keep

the technical representative fully informed of contractor discussions that relate to technical matters

within the purview of the technical representative's assigned duties.

Parent topic: PGI 242.74 -TECHNICAL REPRESENTATION AT CONTRACTOR FACILITIES