alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
10(z-3) 


 


RESOLUTIONS OF BOARD OF DIRECTORS


 


RESOLVED,
    that each non-employee director may transfer, without consideration, any
    and all options granted to him by the Company (i) under the Company’s 1995 Non-Employee Directors Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan and 1997 Non-Employee Directors Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan and (ii) outside of a stockholder approved plan, subject to the provisions of such options, to any person who is a “family member” of
    such director as such term is used in the instructions to Form S-8 or to
    a trust solely for the benefit of such director and his or her such family
members; and


 


RESOLVED, that the officers of the Company be, and each of them hereby is, authorized and empowered on behalf of the Company to prepare, execute and deliver and file all such consents, resolutions, certificates, instruments and documents, and to do or cause to be done any and all such further acts and things, that are in their judgment necessary, desirable or appropriate to carry out the purpose of the foregoing resolution.


 


* * *


 


RESOLUTIONS OF COMPENSATION AND PERSONNEL COMMITTEE


 


RESOLVED,
    that each non-employee director may transfer, without consideration, any
    and all options granted to him by the Company under the Company’s 2007 Incentive Plan, subject to the provisions of such options, to any person who is a “family member” of
    such director as such term is used in the instructions to Form S-8 or to
    a trust solely for the benefit of such director and his or her such family
members; and


 


RESOLVED, that the officers of the Company be, and each of them hereby is, authorized and empowered on behalf of the Company to prepare, execute and deliver and file all such consents, resolutions, certificates, instruments and documents, and to do or cause to be done any and all such further acts and things, that are in their judgment necessary, desirable or appropriate to carry out the purpose of the foregoing resolution.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 247 (Monday, December 27, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 81211]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-32442]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Notice of Lincoln County Resource Advisory Committee Meeting

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the authorities in the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act (Pub. L. 92-463) and under the Secure Rural Schools and Community 
Self-Determination Act of 2000 (Public Law 106-393) the Kootenai 
National Forest's Lincoln County Resource Advisory Committee will meet 
on Wednesday, January 5, 2011 at 6 p.m. at the Forest Supervisor's 
Office in Libby, Montana for a business meeting. The meeting is open to 
the public.

DATES: January 5, 2011.

ADDRESSES: Forest Supervisor's Office, 31374 US Hwy 2, Libby, Montana.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Janette Turk, Committee Coordinator, 
Kootenai National Forest at (406) 283-7764, or e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#016b7574736a4167722f6764652f7472"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="345e4041465f7452471a5251501a4147">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Agenda will include planning for future RAC 
priorities. If the meeting date or location is changed, notice will be 
posted in the local newspapers, including the Daily Interlake based in 
Kalispell, Montana.

    Dated: December 16, 2010.
Paul Bradford,
Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 2010-32442 Filed 12-23-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Case 2:06-cv-00757-LES-CSC Document 3 Filed 09/05/2006 Page 1 of 1
###### Editorial Note on Part 4

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 4 appear at 77 FR 39904, July 6, 2012.

#### § 4.540 Employment.

No qualified disabled person shall, on the basis of disability, be subjected to discrimination in employment under any program or activity conducted by the agency. The definitions, requirements, and procedures of section 501 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 791), as established by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission in 29 CFR part 1613, shall apply to employment in federally conducted programs or activities.
IV 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 281 

Expressing support for designation of April 2017 as ‘‘Second Chance Month’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 26, 2017 

Mr. CA ́RDENAS (for himself, Mr. JEFFRIES, Mr. BISHOP of Georgia, Mr. 

CHABOT, Mr. CURBELO of Florida, Mr. CONYERS, Mrs. LOVE, Mr. 

WALKER, Mr. RUSSELL, Ms. BASS, and Mr. DANNY K. DAVIS of Illinois) 

submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee 

on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for designation of April 2017 as ‘‘Second 

Chance Month’’. 

Whereas April 2017 is an appropriate month to designate as 

‘‘Second Chance Month’’: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) honors the work of communities, govern3 mental entities, nonprofit organizations, congrega4 tions, employers, and individuals to remove unneces5 sary legal and societal barriers that prevent an indi6 vidual with a criminal record from becoming a pro7 ductive member of society; and 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 281 IH 

1 (2) calls on the people of the United States to 

2 observe Second Chance Month through actions and 

3 programs that— 

4 (A) promote awareness of collateral con5 sequences; and 

6 (B) provide closure for individuals who 

7 have paid their debts. 

Æ 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BYRON ESTRADA-CHACON, 

Petitioner, 

 v. 

WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General, 

Respondent.

No. 17-70505 

Agency No. A091-617-775 

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted April 17, 2019**

Before: McKEOWN, BYBEE, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

Byron Estrada-Chacon, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions pro se 

for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from 

an immigration judge’s decision denying asylum and related relief. Our jurisdiction 

is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo questions of law. Ahmed v. 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

APR 24 2019

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 17-70505 

Holder, 569 F.3d 1009, 1012 (9th Cir. 2009). We deny in part and dismiss in part 

the petition for review.

The agency did not err or violate due process in determining that EstradaChacon’s conviction under California Penal Code (“CPC”) § 288(a) in 1988 is an 

aggravated felony, where the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant 

Responsibility Act of 1996 (“IIRIRA”) includes “sexual abuse of a minor” in the 

list of aggravated felonies, and the definition of an aggravated felony under 

IIRIRA applies regardless of the date of the commission of the crime. See Becker 

v. Gonzales, 473 F.3d 1000, 1002 (9th Cir. 2007); Padilla-Martinez v. Holder, 770 

F.3d 825, 830 (9th Cir. 2014) (“To prevail on a due-process claim, a petitioner 

must demonstrate both a violation of rights and prejudice.”). Accordingly, the 

agency properly determined Estrada-Chacon is ineligible for asylum. See 8 U.S.C. 

§ 1158(b)(2)(A)(ii), (B)(i); 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43)(A) (“sexual abuse of a minor” 

is an aggravated felony); United States v. Medina-Villa, 567 F.3d 507, 520 (9th 

Cir. 2009) (a conviction under CPC § 288(a) constitutes “sexual abuse of a 

minor”).

Estrada-Chacon’s contention that CPC § 288(c)(1) is broader than the 

federal definition of “sexual abuse of a minor” is unavailing, where he was 

convicted under CPC § 288(a).

We lack jurisdiction to review Estrada-Chacon’s unexhausted contention 
3 17-70505 

that his conviction is not a crime involving moral turpitude. See Tijani v. Holder, 

628 F.3d 1071, 1080 (9th Cir. 2010) (“We lack jurisdiction to review legal claims 

not presented in an alien’s administrative proceedings before the BIA.”).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.
###### Editorial Note on Part 2

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

#### § 2.403 Notice of proposed action on applications for operating licenses pursuant to appendix N of 10 CFR part 50.

In the case of applications pursuant to appendix N of part 50 of this chapter for operating licenses for nuclear power reactors, if the Commission has not found that a hearing is in the public interest, the Commission or the Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, as appropriate will, prior to acting thereon, cause to be published in the Federal Register, pursuant to § 2.105, a notice of proposed action with respect to each application as soon as practicable after the applications have been docketed.

[73 FR 5717, Jan. 31, 2008, as amended at 84 FR 65643, Nov. 29, 2019]
2007-1924.

#### State ex rel. Payne v. Glaeden.

In Habeas Corpus. On petition for writ of habeas corpus of Edward Payne and respondent’s motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss granted. Cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.

O’Donnell, J., dissents and would grant an alternative writ.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 

PUBLIC MEETING ON STANDARDS FOR 

COMMERCIAL UNITARY AIR CONDITIONERS AND HEAT PUMPS 

U.S. Department of Energy 

Room 1E-245 

1000 Independence Avenue, SW 

Washington, DC 20585 

September 30, 2004 

Purpose 

The Department will present its methodology for the Advance Notice of Proposed 

Rulemaking (ANOPR) analysis and example results. The Department also will explain 

its plans for the remaining analysis—the analysis to support the Notice of Proposed 

Rulemaking—and will seek input from stakeholders on its planned methodologies, 

assumptions, and data sources. 

Agenda 

 9:00-9:05 am Welcome

 

 9:05-9:15 am Introduction and Agenda Review 

 Doug Brookman 

 9:15-9:30 am Rulemaking Overview 

Jim Raba 

This is an overview of the analyses in the rulemaking, the 

tools DOE uses to generate results for each analysis, and 

the issues on which DOE would like input during today’s 

meeting. 

 

 9:30-10:00 am Comments from Participants 

This is an open forum for participants to make a brief 

summary statement and/or identify their key issues 

regarding the ANOPR analyses, methods, and data. 

 

 10:00-11:15 am Engineering Analysis 

Dave Winiarski and Aris Marantan 

This is a summary presentation and discussion regarding 

the approach used and factors considered for the market 

and technology assessment, screening analysis, and 

engineering analysis, and a characterization of the results. 

 11:15-11:30 am Break 

 EE-RM-STD-01-375 COMMENT 24D
 

 11:30 am-12:45 pm Life-Cycle Cost Analysis 

Dave Winiarski and Greg Rosenquist 

This is a summary presentation and discussion regarding 

the approach used and factors considered for the life-cycle 

cost analysis, building energy use and end-use load 

characterization, markups, and payback period analysis, 

and a characterization of the results. 

 12:45-1:45 pm Lunch (on your own) 

 1:45-3:00 pm National Impact Analysis 

Greg Rosenquist 

This is a summary presentation and discussion regarding 

the approach used and factors considered for the national 

energy savings, net present value, and shipments analysis, 

and a characterization of the results. 

 3:00-3:30 pm Discussion of Other Issues 

This is an open forum to discuss any remaining questions 

or issues identified by participants. 

 3:30-3:45 pm Break 

 3:45-4:30 pm NOPR Analyses and Next Steps 

Jim McMahon, Mike Rivest and Jim Raba 

This is a summary presentation and discussion regarding 

the planned revisions to the ANOPR analyses, and the 

planned approach and factors that will be considered for the 

manufacturer, utility, employment, and regulatory impact 

analyses, and the environmental assessment. 

 

 4:30-5:00 pm Final Discussions 

This is an opportunity to discuss any remaining issues. 

 5:00 pm Adjourn 

 EE-RM-STD-01-375 COMMENT 24D
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 18

- 11290 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.

MARK LEE , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:16

- CR

- 199

- 1

Before KING, ELROD, and WILLETT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Mark Lee has
moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Lee h a s not filed a response. We have revi ewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED May 22, 2019 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 18-11290 Document: 00514967884 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/22/2019No. 18

- 11290

2 Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, couns el is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 18-11290 Document: 00514967884 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/22/2019
IV 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 224 

Recognizing the 150th Anniversary of Howard University and its contributions 

to the United States. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 23, 2017 

Mr. CUMMINGS submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Education and the Workforce 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the 150th Anniversary of Howard University 

and its contributions to the United States. 

Whereas Howard University is celebrating its sesquicentennial on March 2, 2017, celebrating achievements and 

milestones and its rich legacy of excellence in truth and 

service; 

Whereas Howard University was chartered by Congress in 

1867 that set its mission and vision to provide AfricanAmericans with access to a high quality education during 

an era of socioeconomic inequalities that still impacts African-American and other minority communities today; 

Whereas Howard University is a comprehensive research institution comprised of 13 schools and colleges with students pursuing more than 120 areas of study, and it has 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 224 IH 

awarded more than 120,000 degrees in the arts, sciences, 

and the humanities; 

Whereas Howard University produces more African-American 

doctors, dentists, lawyers, and Ph.D. degree holders than 

any other American university; 

Whereas Howard University has four Rhodes Scholars, which 

is the largest among Historically Black Colleges and Universities; 

Whereas Howard University has produced a Justice of the 

Supreme Court, cabinet secretaries, diplomats, Members 

of Congress, local officials, and three Mayors of the Nation’s capital—including the city’s first female mayor; 

Whereas Howard University students, each year, participate 

in the Alternative Spring Break program, which focuses 

on addressing community needs in various cities across 

the country; 

Whereas Howard University has a national radio show that 

educates small businesses on best practices to be successful; 

Whereas Howard University’s Center for Urban Progress 

works to address urban challenges, locally, nationally, 

and globally through community and agency partnerships; 

Whereas the Howard University Hospital serves vulnerable 

and economically disadvantaged populations that need 

medical care; 

Whereas Howard University’s Charles B. Rangel International Affairs Program, created to promote greater diversity and excellence in the United States Foreign Service, has prepared students from across the country and 

other institutions to become Foreign Service Officers, 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 224 IH 

representing the United States in countries such as 

China, Korea, South Africa, and Germany; and 

Whereas Howard University has contributed historic periodicals from the 20th century to the National Museum of 

African American History and Culture: Now, therefore, 

be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives cele2 brates and honors Howard University for its rich legacy 

3 and contributions to the local, national, and global com4 munities. 

Æ 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
**Arkansas**

**Arkansas 09 Craighead**
#### § 600.102 Effect on other issuances.

For awards subject to this subpart, all administrative requirements of codified program regulations, program manuals, handbooks and other nonregulatory materials which are inconsistent with the requirements of this subpart shall be superseded, except to the extent they are required by statute, or authorized in accordance with the deviations provision in § 600.4.
§ 73.80 Violations. ( a ) The Commission may obtain an injunction or other court order to prevent a violation of the provisions of— ( 1 ) The Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended;
( 2 ) Title II of the Energy Reorganization Act of 1974, as amended; or
( 3 ) A regulation or order issued pursuant to those Acts.
( b ) The Commission may obtain a court order for the payment of a civil penalty imposed under section 234 of the Atomic Energy Act: ( 1 ) For violations of— ( i ) Sections 53, 57, 62, 63, 81, 82, 101, 103, 104, 107, or 109 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended:
( ii ) Section 206 of the Energy Reorganization Act;
( iii ) Any rule, regulation, or order issued pursuant to the sections specified in paragraph (b)(1)(i) of this section;
( iv ) Any term, condition, or limitation of any license issued under the sections specified in paragraph (b)(1)(i) of this section.
( 2 ) For any violation for which a license may be revoked under Section 186 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended.
[57 FR 55078, Nov. 24, 1992]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                            2220
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      183
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  3236
<PP&E>                                           30436
<DEPRECIATION>                                   11539
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   22362
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              621
<BONDS>                                          12467
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                        9274
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     22326
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  3822
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     2145
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  1188
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 952
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (463)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (463)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (463)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (15.27)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (15.27)
        

</TABLE>
§ 605.12 Funding. ( a ) The project period during which DOE expects to provide support for an approved project under this part shall generally not exceed 3 years and may exceed 5 years only if DOE makes a renewal award or otherwise extends the award. The project period shall be specified on the Notice of Financial Assistance Award (DOE Form 4600.1).
( b ) Each budget period, of an award under this part, shall generally be 12 months and may be as much as 24 months as determined appropriate by SC.
[57 FR 40583, Sept. 3, 1992, as amended at 79 FR 76047, Dec. 19, 2014]
#### § 431.446 Small electric motors energy conservation standards and their effective dates.

(a) Each small electric motor manufactured (alone or as a component of another piece of non-covered equipment) after March 9, 2015, or in the case of a small electric motor which requires listing or certification by a nationally recognized safety testing laboratory, after March 9, 2017, shall have an average full load efficiency of not less than the following:

| Motor horsepower/standard kilowatt equivalent | Average full load efficiency | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Polyphase | | |
| Open motors (number of poles) | | |
| 6 | 4 | 2 |
| 0.25/0.18 | 67.5 | 69.5 | 65.6 |
| 0.33/0.25 | 71.4 | 73.4 | 69.5 |
| 0.5/0.37 | 75.3 | 78.2 | 73.4 |
| 0.75/0.55 | 81.7 | 81.1 | 76.8 |
| 1/0.75 | 82.5 | 83.5 | 77.0 |
| 1.5/1.1 | 83.8 | 86.5 | 84.0 |
| 2/1.5 | N/A | 86.5 | 85.5 |
| 3/2.2 | N/A | 86.9 | 85.5 |

| Motor horsepower/standard kilowatt equivalent | Average full load efficiency | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Capacitor-start capacitor-run and capacitor-start induction-run | | |
| Open motors (number of poles) | | |
| 6 | 4 | 2 |
| 0.25/0.18 | 62.2 | 68.5 | 66.6 |
| 0.33/0.25 | 66.6 | 72.4 | 70.5 |
| 0.5/0.37 | 76.2 | 76.2 | 72.4 |
| 0.75/0.55 | 80.2 | 81.8 | 76.2 |
| 1/0.75 | 81.1 | 82.6 | 80.4 |
| 1.5/1.1 | N/A | 83.8 | 81.5 |
| 2/1.5 | N/A | 84.5 | 82.9 |
| 3/2.2 | N/A | N/A | 84.1 |

(b) For purposes of determining the required minimum average full load efficiency of an electric motor that has a horsepower or kilowatt rating between two horsepower or two kilowatt ratings listed in any table of efficiency standards in [paragraph (a)](/on/2024-09-17/title-10/section-431.446#p-431.446(a)) of this section, each such motor shall be deemed to have a listed horsepower or kilowatt rating, determined as follows:

(1) A horsepower at or above the midpoint between the two consecutive horsepower ratings shall be rounded up to the higher of the two horsepower ratings;

(2) A horsepower below the midpoint between the two consecutive horsepower ratings shall be rounded down to the lower of the two horsepower ratings; or

(3) A kilowatt rating shall be directly converted from kilowatts to horsepower using the formula 1 kilowatt = (1/0.746) hp, without calculating beyond three significant decimal places, and the resulting horsepower shall be rounded in accordance with [paragraphs (b)(1)](/on/2024-09-17/title-10/section-431.446#p-431.446(b)(1)) or [(b)(2)](/on/2024-09-17/title-10/section-431.446#p-431.446(b)(2)) of this section, whichever applies.

[[75 FR 10947](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/75-FR-10947), Mar. 9, 2010; [75 FR 17036](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/75-FR-17036), Apr. 5, 2010]