alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV 

House Calendar No. 91 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 418 

[Report No. 109–228] 

Requesting the President to transmit to the House of Representatives not 

later than 14 days after the date of the adoption of this resolution 

documents in the possession of the President relating to the disclosure 

of the identity and employment of Ms. Valerie Plame. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 29, 2005 

Mr. HOLT (for himself, Mr. INSLEE, Mr. GRIJALVA, Mr. CONYERS, Mr. 

KUCINICH, Mr. TIERNEY, Mr. MCDERMOTT, Mr. ACKERMAN, Mr. 

DEFAZIO, Mr. HINCHEY, Mr. DELAHUNT, Mr. DOYLE, Mr. UDALL of 

Colorado, Mr. VISCLOSKY, Mr. MCGOVERN, Mr. PALLONE, Ms. LEE, and 

Ms. MATSUI) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 

the Select Committee on Intelligence (Permanent Select) 

SEPTEMBER 21, 2005 

Additional sponsors: Mr. CROWLEY, Mr. SMITH of Washington, and Ms. 

BERKLEY

SEPTEMBER 21, 2005 

Reported adversely from the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, 

referred to the House Calendar, and ordered to be printed 

RESOLUTION 

Requesting the President to transmit to the House of Representatives not later than 14 days after the date of 

the adoption of this resolution documents in the posses-
2 

•HRES 418 RH 

sion of the President relating to the disclosure of the 

identity and employment of Ms. Valerie Plame. 

1 Resolved, That the President is requested to transmit 

2 to the House of Representatives not later than the date 

3 that is 14 days after the date of the adoption of this reso4 lution, all documents, including telephone and electronic 

5 mail records, logs and calendars, personnel records, and 

6 records of internal discussions in the possession of the 

7 President relating to the disclosure of the identity of Ms. 

8 Valerie Plame as an employee of the Central Intelligence 

9 Agency during the period beginning on May 6, 2003, and 

10 ending on July 31, 2003. 

House Calendar No. 91 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 418 

[Report No. 109–228] 

RESOLUTION 

Requesting the President to transmit to the House 

of Ms. Valerie Plame. to the disclosure of the identity and employment ments in the possession of the President relating the date of the adoption of this resolution docuof Representatives not later than 14 days after 

SEPTEMBER 21, 2005 

Reported adversely, referred to the House Calendar, and 

ordered to be printed
228 So.2d 484

#### STATE of Louisiana v. Eddie WEBSTER.

No. 50257.

Dec. 11, 1969.

■In re: Eddie Webster applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition and/or mandamus.

Writ denied. Application is premature. Relator may seek review in event of an adverse judgment revoking probation.
PGI 225.504 Evaluation examples.       The following examples illustrate the evaluation procedures in DFARS 225.502(c)(ii). The examples assume that the contracting officer has eliminated all offers that are unacceptable for reasons other than price or a trade agreement and that price is the determining factor in contract award. The same evaluation procedures and the 50 percent evaluation factor apply regardless of whether the acquisition is subject to the Buy American Act (BAA) or the Balance of Payments Program (BOPP).          (1) Example 1.          Offer A $945,000 Foreign offer subject to BAA/BOPP          Offer B $950,000 Foreign offer exempt from BAA/BOPP          Since no domestic offers are received, do not apply the evaluation factor. Award on Offer A.          (2) Example 2.          Offer A $950,000 Domestic offer          Offer B $890,000 Foreign offer exempt from BAA/BOPP          Offer C $880,000 Foreign offer subject to BAA/BOPP          Since the exempt foreign offer is lower than the domestic offer, do not apply the evaluation factor. Award on Offer C.          (3) Example 3.          Offer A $9,100 Foreign offer exempt from BAA/BOPP          Offer B $8,900 Domestic offer          Offer C $6,000 Foreign offer subject to BAA/BOPP          Since the domestic offer is lower than the exempt foreign offer, apply the 50 percent evaluation factor to Offer C. This results in an evaluated price of $9,000 for Offer C. Award on Offer B.          (4) Example 4.          Offer A $910,000 Foreign offer exempt from BAA/BOPP          Offer B $890,000 Domestic offer          Offer C $590,000 Foreign offer subject to BAA/BOPP          Since the domestic offer is lower than the exempt foreign offer, apply the 50 percent evaluation factor to Offer C. This results in an evaluated price of $885,000 for Offer C. Award on Offer C.          (5) Example 5.          Offer A $900,000 Foreign offer exempt from BAA/BOPP          Offer B $850,000 Domestic offer (complies with the required domestic content)          Offer C $550,000 Foreign offer subject to BAA/BOPP (exceeds the required domestic content)          Since the domestic offer complies with the required domestic content and is lower than the exempt foreign offer, apply the 50 percent evaluation factor to Offer C. This results in an evaluated price of $825,000 for Offer C. Award on Offer C.    **Parent topic:** PGI 225.5 -EVALUATING FOREIGN OFFERS-SUPPLY CONTRACTS
#### KROMER, Appellant, v. KLETT, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

May 29, 1914.)

Action by Edward Kromer against Louisa Klett, individually and as executrix, etc., of Martin Klett, deceased.

No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. See decision in 148 N. Y. Supp. 1125, decided herewith.
###### Take the Smoke-free Home Pledge

###### Event Log

#### Take the Smoke-free Home Pledge

Number of young children (birth-6 yrs. old) in the home:________

#### Has smoking been allowed in the home or car (by family or visitors): ( Yes   ( No

### I, ___________________________, on ____________,__________,

(Your name here)(Date)(ZIP Code)

pledge to protect children from the health risks of secondhand smoke by keeping my home and car smoke-free.

Would you like a *Smoke-free Home Kit* mailed to you?   ( Yes   ( No

Name:______________________________________________________

Address:____________________________________________________

City:_______________________State:_____ZIP Code:_______________

***Congratulations on making your***

***home and car smoke-free!***

#### Take the Smoke-free Home Pledge

Number of young children (birth-6 yrs. old) in the home:________

Has smoking been allowed in the home or car (by family or visitors): ( Yes   ( No

### I, ___________________________, on ___________,___________,

(Your name here)(Date)(ZIP Code)

pledge to protect children from the health risks of secondhand smoke by keeping my home and car smoke-free.

Would you like a *Smoke-free Home Kit* mailed to you?   ( Yes   ( No

Name:______________________________________________________

Address:____________________________________________________

City:_______________________State:_____ZIP Code:_______________

***Congratulations on making your***

***home and car smoke-free!                                                                                               !***

�

�

Smoke-free Home Pledge:

Planning Guide for Pledge Events

Place your organization’s logo or graphic here (be sure to delete this text)

Smoke-free Home Pledge Sheet

I pledge to protect children from the health risks of secondhand smoke by keeping my home and car smoke-free.

�

�

Place your organization’s logo or graphic here (be sure to delete this text)

www.epa.gov/smokefree

 (Or use your organization’s website/hotline)

�

Place your organization’s logo or graphic here (be sure to delete this text)

www.epa.gov/smokefree

 (Or use your organization’s website/hotline)
#### § 7.20 Conflict of interest reviews of advisory committee members' outside interests.

The Designated Federal Officer or alternate for each NRC advisory committee and the General Counsel or designee shall review the interests and affiliations of each member of the Designated Federal Officer's advisory committee annually, and upon the commencement of the member's appointment to the committee, for the purpose of ensuring that such appointment is consistent with the laws and regulations on conflict of interest applicable to that member.

[67 FR 79843, Dec. 31, 2002]
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 150 (Friday, August 3, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 46374-46375]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-19025]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service

[Docket No. APHIS-2012-0044]

National Poultry Improvement Plan; General Conference Committee 
Meeting and 41st Biennial Conference

AGENCY: Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are giving notice of a meeting of the General Conference 
Committee of the National Poultry Improvement Plan (NPIP) and the 
NPIP's 41st Biennial Conference.

DATES: The General Conference Committee meeting will be held on 
September 25, 2012, from 12 p.m. to 4 p.m. The Biennial Conference will 
meet on September 26, 2012, from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m., and on September 27, 
2012, from 8 a.m. to 12 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Loews New Orleans Hotel, 300 
Poydras Street, New Orleans, LA.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. C. Stephen Roney, Senior 
Coordinator, National Poultry Improvement Plan, VS, APHIS, 1506 
Klondike Road, Suite 300, Conyers, GA 30094-5173, (770) 922-3496.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The General Conference Committee (the 
Committee) of the National Poultry Improvement Plan (NPIP), 
representing cooperating State agencies and poultry industry members, 
serves an essential function by acting as a liaison between the poultry
    industry and the Department in matters pertaining to poultry 
health. The Committee meets to discuss significant poultry health 
issues and makes recommendations to improve the NPIP program.
    Topics for discussion at the upcoming meetings include:
    1. Salmonella testing.
    2. Technical Committee report.
    3. Avian influenza.
    4. USDA regulatory review.
    The meetings will be open to the public. However, due to time 
constraints, the public will not be allowed to provide oral comments 
pertaining to the discussions during either of the meetings. Written 
statements on meeting topics may be filed with the Committee before or 
after the meeting by sending them to the person listed under FOR 
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. Written statements may also be filed at 
the meeting. Please refer to Docket No.

[[Page 46375]]

APHIS-2012-0044 when submitting your statements.
    If you require special accommodations, such as a sign language 
interpreter, please call or write the individual listed under FOR 
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
    This notice of meeting is given pursuant to section 10 of the 
Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App. 2).

    Done in Washington, DC, this 30th day of July 2012.
Kevin Shea,
Acting Administrator, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. 2012-19025 Filed 8-2-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-34-P
```
###### Editorial Note on Part 72

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 72 appear at 80 FR 74981, Dec. 1, 2015, and at 81 FR 86910, Dec. 2, 2016.

#### § 72.244 Application for amendment of a certificate of compliance.

Whenever a certificate holder desires to amend the CoC (including a change to the terms, conditions or specifications of the CoC), an application for an amendment shall be filed with the Commission fully describing the changes desired and the reasons for such changes, and following as far as applicable the form prescribed for original applications.

[64 FR 53617, Oct. 4, 1999]
#### In the Matter of Rochester Urban Renewal Agency, Respondent, v Ruth Taksen-Berger, Individually and as Executrix of Samuel Berger, Deceased, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously reversed, without costs, and a new trial granted, in accordance with same memorandum as in *Rochester Urban Renewal Agency v Ram Ltd. Partnership, 78*AD2d 1007). (Appeal from judgment of Monroe Supreme Court—condemnation.) Present—Cardamone, J. P., Simons, Hancock, Jr., Callahan and Moule, JJ.
From: Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US

To: nfrey@omb.eop.gov Cc: Beth Hassett

- Sipple/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Joseph

- J Dougherty/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Scott

Jenkins/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, martin.karen@epa.gov, Susan Stone/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Alison Davis/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Steven Silverman/DC/USEPA/US@EPA Date: 06/07/2012 02:53 PM Subject: Summary response to the interagency comments we received on the Air Quality Index (AQI)

section of the PM preamble

Nathan,

Attached below is a summary response to the comments we've received both verbally and in writing from the interagency group on t he AQI. In addition, I'm attaching the studies that we discussed in our meeting yesterday, which include the studies you requested earlier today. We intend to modify the preamble to reflect the changes identified in this response. I'd like to discuss wi th you at 4:30 the timing for when we will send the revisions to the preamble that elaborate upon this summary response. Thanks. .

Lydia

----- Forwarded by Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US on 06/07/2012 02:47 PM

-----

From: Scott Jenkins/RTP/USEPA/US To: Lydi a Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA Cc: Karen Martin/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Beth Hassett

- Sipple <hassett

- sipple.beth@epa.gov>, Susan

Stone/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA Date: 06/07/2012 02:40 PM Subject: Response to Interagency comments on the PM AQI

Lydia, Attached are responses t o Interagency comments received on the AQI.

In addition, I have attached the health studies noted by Susan on yesterday's teleconference. These studies were used to support the proposed decision to revise the 500 level of the AQI.



### Schreuder et al 2006

Barregard et all 2008

Delfino et al 2009

Mar et al 2000

Sarnat et al 2008

### Comment s 5 through 8 on the AQI

Response: As discussed on the teleconference on June 6, we agree to make several changes to the preamble discussion of the AQI

- Rather than proposing two different possible approaches to setting the AQI value of 100, we will revise the preamble to propose setting the value at the level
of the 24

- hour PM2.5 standard and to solicit comment on the alternative approach of setting the v alue below the level of this short

- term standard.

- We will note in the preamble that the 500 level of the AQI does not establish an SHL and that we are not proposing an SHL for PM2.5 in this package. The preamble will also be revised to note that, if in the future we do set an SHL different from the 500 level of the AQI (i.e., as part of the Emergency Episode Program), we will adjust the AQI accordingly.

In addition to these edits, we note that EPA (OAR, ORD) continues to work with CDC
and with the For est Service to creat e joint documents for use in fires and to create a central site on AIRNow containing information related to fires (airnow.gov/fire). We anticipate that such collaborations will continue and will contribute to the development of fire

- re lated public health messages that will be useful across multiple Federal Agencies

.
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHEASTERN BOLL WEEVIL )

ERADICATION FOUNDATION, )

)

Plaintiff, )

v. ) Civil Action No. CV-06-756-MHT

)

BOLL WEEVIL ERADICATION )

FOUNDATION OF GEORGIA, INC.; )

TOMMY IRVIN in his capacity as )

TRUSTEE OF BOLL WEEVIL )

ERADICATION FOUNDATION )

OF GEORGIA, INC. )

)

Defendants. )

____________________________________)

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

COMES NOW T. Randall Lyons, attorney with the firm Webster, Henry, Lyons &

White, P.C., and notifies this Honorable Court and all counsel of record of his appearance as

additional counsel for the Plaintiff Southeastern Boll Weevil Eradication Foundation, Inc.

/s/ T. Randall Lyons 

T. Randall Lyons (LYO006)

Attorney for Southeastern Boll Weevil Eradication 

Foundation, Inc.

Case 2:06-cv-00756-MHT-WC Document 14 Filed 10/06/2006 Page 1 of 2
2

OF COUNSEL:

WEBSTER, HENRY, LYONS & WHITE, P.C.

Post Office Box 239

Montgomery, Alabama 36101-0239

Telephone: (334) 264-9472

Facsimile: (334) 264-9599

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that I have served a copy of the above and foregoing pleading on

counsel as follows by ECF or by placing same in the U.S. Mail, properly addressed and

first-class postage prepaid on this the 6 day of October, 2006. th

Tommy Irvin 

Georgia Commissioner of Agriculture

19 Martin Luther King Dr., SW

Atlanta, GA 30334

Duke R. Groover

Groover & Childs

William H. Noland

P.O. Box 898

Macon, Georgia 31202

Jerry A. Buchanan

Benjamin A. Land

Buchanan & Land, LLP

P. O. Box 2848

Columbus, Georgia 31902

Simeon F. Penton

Kaufman & Rothfeder, P.C.

P. O. Drawer 4540

Montgomery, Alabama 36102

________________________________

OF COUNSEL

Case 2:06-cv-00756-MHT-WC Document 14 Filed 10/06/2006 Page 2 of 2
#### Eugene S. Pike *v.*Samuel B. Raymond, County Collector.

*Opinion filed February 20, 1901.*

This case is controlled by the decision in *Earl*& *Wilson*v. *Raymond,*188 Ill. 15.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. E. F. Dunne, Judge, presiding.

Pike & Gade, (Robert S. Iles, of counsel,) for appellant.

Julius A. Johnson, County Attorney, and Frank L. Shepard, Assistant County Attorney, for appellee.

Per Curiam:

The appellant filed his bill in equity in the circuit court of Cook county to restrain the collection of taxes assessed and extended against his personal-property on a valuation increased by the board of review from the assessed value of $1685 fixed by the board of assessors from appellant’s schedule, to the assessed value of $42,400 found and fixed by said board of review after notice and hearing given to appellant. The grounds of the suit and points made on this appeal are substantially the same as were urged in *Earl & Wilson*v. *Raymond,*188 Ill. 15, *Kimbark*v. *Raymond,*id. 66, and *American Express Co. v. Raymond, {ante,*p. 232,) and which in those cases were held insufficient to sustain the bill. Following those decisions it must be held that the court below decided correctly in dismissing the bill.

The decree will be affirmed.

*Decree affirmed.*
§ 60.52 Termination of license. ( a ) Following permanent closure and the decontamination or dismantlement of surface facilities, DOE may apply for an amendment to terminate the license.
( b ) Such application shall be filed, and will be reviewed, in accordance with the provisions of § 60.45 and this section.
( c ) A license shall be terminated only when the Commission finds with respect to the geologic repository: ( 1 ) That the final disposition of radioactive wastes has been made in conformance with the DOE's plan, as amended and approved as part of the license.
( 2 ) That the final state of the geologic repository operations area conforms to DOE's plans for permanent closure and DOE's plans for the decontamination or dismantlement of surface facilities, as amended and approved as part of the license.
( 3 ) That the termination of the license is authorized by law, including sections 57, 62, and 81 of the Atomic Energy Act, as amended.
[46 FR 13980, Feb. 25, 1981, as amended at 48 FR 28222, June 21, 1983]
Editorial Note on Part 55
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 55 appear at 80 FR 74980, Dec. 1, 2015.

§ 55.2 Scope. The regulations in this part apply to— ( a ) Any individual who manipulates the controls of any utilization facility licensed under parts 50, 52, or 54 of this chapter,
( b ) Any individual designated by a facility licensee to be responsible for directing any licensed activity of a licensed operator.
( c ) Any facility license.
[52 FR 9460, Mar. 25, 1987, as amended at 59 FR 5938, Feb. 9, 1994; 72 FR 49560, Aug. 28, 2007]
IV 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 528 

Requesting the President to designate the Thursday before Thanksgiving 

Day as ‘‘Feed America Thursday’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 2, 2005 

Mr. CANNON (for himself, Mr. BISHOP of Utah, and Mr. MATHESON) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 

Agriculture 

RESOLUTION 

Requesting the President to designate the Thursday before 

Thanksgiving Day as ‘‘Feed America Thursday’’. 

Whereas Thanksgiving Day celebrates the spirit of selfless 

giving and an appreciation for family and friends; 

Whereas the spirit of Thanksgiving Day is a virtue upon 

which our Nation was founded; 

Whereas 33,000,000 Americans, including 13,000,000 children, continue to live in households that do not have an 

adequate supply of food; 

Whereas almost 3,000,000 of those children experience hunger; 
2 

•HRES 528 IH 

Whereas selfless sacrifice breeds a genuine spirit of thanksgiving, both affirming and restoring fundamental principles in our society; 

Whereas great numbers of Americans this year are suffering 

hunger and other privations from the results of hurricanes and other natural disasters; and 

Whereas the Thursday before Thanksgiving Day should be 

designated as ‘‘Feed America Thursday’’: Now, therefore, 

be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives requests 

2 that the President issue a proclamation designating ‘‘Feed 

3 America Thursday’’ and calling upon the people of the 

4 United States to sacrifice 2 meals on that day, and to do5 nate the money that they would have spent on food for 

6 those 2 meals to a religious or charitable organization of 

7 their choice for the purpose of feeding the hungry. 

Æ