alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# SUBCHAPTER C - CONTRACTING METHODS AND CONTRACT TYPES

- PART 813 - SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION PROCEDURES 
- PART 814 - SEALED BIDDING 
- PART 815 - CONTRACTING BY NEGOTIATION 
- PART 816 - TYPES OF CONTRACTS 
- PART 817 - SPECIAL CONTRACTING METHODS 

- PART 813 - SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION PROCEDURES     - 813.003-70   General policy.
  - Subpart 813.1 - Procedures     - 813.102   Source list.
    - 813.106   Soliciting competition, evaluation of quotations or offers, award and documentation.
    - 813.106-70   Soliciting competition, evaluation of quotations or offers, award and documentation - the Veterans First Contracting Program.
  - Subpart 813.2 [Reserved]
  - Subpart 813.3 - Simplified Acquisition Methods     - 813.305-70   VA's imprest funds and third party drafts policy.
- PART 814 - SEALED BIDDING     - Subpart 814.1 [Reserved]
  - Subpart 814.2 - Solicitation of Bids     - 814.201   Preparation of invitations for bids
    - 814.201-2   Part I - The Schedule.
    - 814.201-6   Solicitation provisions.
    - 814.202   General rules for solicitation of bids.
    - 814.202-4   Bid samples.
  - Subpart 814.3 - Submission of Bids     - 814.304   Submission, modification, and withdrawal of bids.
  - Subpart 814.4 [Reserved]
- PART 815 - CONTRACTING BY NEGOTIATION     - Subpart 815.3 - Source Selection     - 815.304-70   Evaluation factor commitments.
    - 815.304-71   Solicitation provision and clause.
    - 815.370   Only one offer.
    - 815.370-1   Policy.
    - 815.370-2   Promote competition.
    - 815.370-3   Fair and reasonable price.
    - 815.370-4   Exceptions.
    - 815.370-5   Solicitation provision.
  - Subparts 815.4 - 815.6 [Reserved]
- PART 816 - TYPES OF CONTRACTS     - Subpart 816.1 [Reserved]
  - Subpart 816.2 - Fixed-Price Contracts     - 816.203   Fixed-price contracts with economic price adjustment.
    - 816.203-4   Contract clauses.
  - Subpart 816.5 - Indefinite-Delivery Contracts     - 816.505   Ordering.
    - 816.506-70   Requirements - supplement for mortuary services.
    - 816.570   Ordering officers.
  - Subpart 816.7 - Agreements     - 816.770   Consignment agreements.
  - Subpart 816.70 [Reserved]
- PART 817 - SPECIAL CONTRACTING METHODS     - Subparts 817.1 - 817.4 [Reserved]
  - Subpart 817.5 - Interagency Acquisitions     - 817.501   General.
  - Subpart 817.70 - Undefinitized Contract Actions     - 817.7000   Scope.
    - 817.7001   Definitions.
    - 817.7002   Exceptions.
    - 817.7003   Policy.
    - 817.7004   Limitations.
    - 817.7004-1   Authorization.
    - 817.7004-2   Price ceiling.
    - 817.7004-3   Definitization schedule.
    - 817.7004-4   Final price negotiation - profit.
    - 817.7005   Contract clause.
§ 710.22 Initial decision process. ( a ) The Manager shall make an initial decision as to the individual's access authorization eligibility based on the existing information in the case if: ( 1 ) The individual fails to respond to the notification letter by filing a timely written request for a hearing before an Administrative Judge or fails to respond to the notification letter after requesting an extension of time to do so;
( 2 ) The individual's response to the notification letter does not request a hearing before an Administrative Judge; or
( 3 ) The Administrative Judge refers the individual's case to the Manager in accordance with § 710.25(e) or § 710.26(b).
( b ) Unless an extension of time is granted by the Director, the Manager's initial decision as to the individual's access authorization eligibility shall be made within 15 calendar days of the date of receipt of the information in paragraph (a) of this section. The Manager shall either grant or deny, or reinstate or revoke, the individual's access authorization.
( c ) A letter reflecting the Manager's initial decision shall be signed by the Manager and delivered to the individual within 15 calendar days of the date of the Manager's decision unless an extension of time is granted by the Director. If the Manager's initial decision is unfavorable to the individual, the individual shall be advised: ( 1 ) Of the Manager's unfavorable decision and the reason(s) therefor;
( 2 ) That within 30 calendar days from the date of receipt of the letter, the individual may file a written request for a review of the Manager's initial decision, through the Director, to the DOE Headquarters Appeal Panel (Appeal Panel);
( 3 ) That the Director may, for good cause shown, at the written request of the individual, extend the time for filing a written request for a review of the case by the Appeal Panel; and
( 4 ) That if the written request for a review of the Manager's initial decision by the Appeal Panel is not filed within 30 calendar days of the individual's receipt of the Manager's letter, or by the date to which the Director has granted an extension, the Manager's initial decision in the case shall be final and not subject to further review or appeal.
[81 FR 71335, Oct. 17, 2016, as amended at 89 FR 59596, July 23, 2024]
937 A.2d 177

#### Shirley WHITED v. Kevin WHITED.

No. 84

Sept. Term, 2007.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Dec. 10, 2007.

Andre P. Barber (Barber & Associates, P.C.), Washington, DC, for petitioner.

Jeffrey Marcowitz, Washington, DC, for respondent.

SUBMITTED BEFORE: BELL, C.J., RAKER, HARRELL, BATTAGLIA and GREENE, JJ.

PER CURIAM

ORDER

The Court having considered and granted the petition for writ of certiorari in the above captioned case, it is this 10th day of December, 2007,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the judgment of the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County be, and it is hereby, vacated, and the case is remanded to that Court for reconsideration in light of *Judith Suter v. Darryl A.*
      *477
      *Stuckey,*402 Md. 211, 935 A.2d 731 (2007). Costs in this Court to be paid by respondent, and costs in the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County to abide the result.
IV 

House Calendar No. 126 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 572 

[Report No. 109–312] 

Providing for consideration of the resolution (H. Res. 571) expressing the 

sense of the House of Representatives that the deployment of United 

States forces in Iraq be terminated immediately and providing for consideration of the concurrent resolution (H. Con. Res. 308) directing the 

Clerk of the House of Representatives to make a technical correction 

in the enrollment of H.R. 3058. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 18, 2005 

Mr. GINGREY, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; 

which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the resolution (H. Res. 571) 

expressing the sense of the House of Representatives 

that the deployment of United States forces in Iraq 

be terminated immediately and providing for consideration of the concurrent resolution (H. Con. Res. 308) 

directing the Clerk of the House of Representatives to 

make a technical correction in the enrollment of H.R. 

3058. 
2 

HRES 572 RH 

1 Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it 

2 shall be in order without intervention of any point of order 

3 to consider in the House the resolution (H. Res. 571) ex4 pressing the sense of the House of Representatives that 

5 the deployment of United States forces in Iraq be termi6 nated immediately. The resolution shall be considered as 

7 read. The previous question shall be considered as ordered 

8 on the resolution to final adoption without intervening mo9 tion except: (1) one hour of debate equally divided and 

10 controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member 

11 of the Committee on International Relations; and (2) one 

12 motion to recommit which may not contain instructions. 

13 SEC. 2. Upon adoption of this resolution, House Con14 current Resolution 308 is hereby adopted. 

House Calendar No. 126 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 572 

[Report No. 109–312] 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the resolution (H. 

nical correction in the enrollment of H.R. 3058. of the House of Representatives to make a techresolution (H. Con. Res. 308) directing the Clerk and providing for consideration of the concurrent States forces in Iraq be terminated immediately Representatives that the deployment of United Res. 571) expressing the sense of the House of 

NOVEMBER 18, 2005 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed
IV 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 521 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (FYROM) should cease its distribution of 

negative and nationalist propaganda and should work with the United 

Nations and Greece to find a mutually acceptable official name for 

the FYROM. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 27, 2005 

Mrs. MALONEY (for herself and Mr. BILIRAKIS) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on International Relations 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that 

the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (FYROM) 

should cease its distribution of negative and nationalist 

propaganda and should work with the United Nations 

and Greece to find a mutually acceptable official name 

for the FYROM. 

Whereas on April 8, 1993, the United Nations General Assembly admitted as a member the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (FYROM), not as the ‘‘Republic of 

Macedonia’’, but as the ‘‘Former Yugoslav Republic of 

Macedonia’’; 

Whereas United Nations Security Council Resolution 817 

(1993) states that the dispute over the name must be re-
2 

•HRES 521 IH 

solved to maintain peaceful relations between Greece and 

the FYROM; 

Whereas on September 13, 1995, Greece and the FYROM 

signed a United Nations brokered Interim Accord; 

Whereas since its admittance to the United Nations in 1993, 

the FYROM has allowed the publishing of negative and 

nationalist propaganda, including in school textbooks; 

Whereas students are being taught that parts of Greece, including Greek Macedonia, belong to the FYROM; 

Whereas some textbooks and maps show that a ‘‘Greater 

Macedonia’’ extends south to Mount Olympus in Greece 

and east to Mount Pirin in Bulgaria; and 

Whereas this misinformation instills hostility in portions of 

the population of the FYROM toward Greece: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) urges the Former Yugoslav Republic of 

3 Macedonia (FYROM) to observe its obligations 

4 under Article 7 of the 1995 United Nations brokered 

5 Interim Accord and take steps to halt the prolifera6 tion of negative propaganda toward Greece and re7 view the contents of textbooks, maps, and teaching 

8 aids to ensure that such tools are stating accurate 

9 information; and 

10 (2) urges the FYROM to work within the 

11 framework of the United Nations process to reach a 

12 mutually acceptable permanent name. 

Æ
#### §§ 501.4-501.5 [Reserved]
19.1505 Set-aside procedures.

(f)(S-90) If the contracting officer determines the woman-owned small business (WOSB) set-aside or

the economically disadvantaged women-owned small business (EDWOSB) setaside under the WOSB

program shall be withdrawn, the reasons supporting the decision shall be documented on DD Form

2579, Small Business Coordination Record, or in an attached and signed memorandum for record to

amend an existing DD Form 2579. The DD Form 2579 shall be retained in the contract file.

Parent topic: SUBPART 19.15 – WOMAN-OWNED SMALL BUSINESS PROGRAM 8
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-11-00530-CR

JOHNNY BRIAN ODOMS APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

----------

FROM CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 3 OF TARRANT COUNTY

----------

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

----------

Appellant Johnny Brian Odoms pled guilty to fraudulent use of identifying 

information, and the trial court sentenced him to ten years’ confinement. In a 

single issue, Appellant argues that his sentence violates the state and federal 

 

1See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.
2

constitutional prohibitions against grossly disproportionate sentences.2 We 

affirm.

In Kim v. State, this court stated the following:

It is axiomatic that errors that are asserted on the part of the trial 

court must generally be brought to the trial court’s attention in order 

to afford the trial court an opportunity to correct the error, if any. To 

preserve for appellate review a complaint that a sentence is grossly 

disproportionate, constituting cruel and unusual punishment, a 

defendant must present to the trial court a timely request, objection, 

or motion stating the specific grounds for the ruling desired.

Kim’s complaint about the alleged disproportionality of his sentence 

was not raised at the time it was imposed or in a motion for new trial. 

Therefore, he preserved nothing for our review.

283 S.W.3d 473, 475 (Tex. App.––Fort Worth 2009, pet. ref’d) (citations omitted). 

We reaffirmed Kim’s holding in Russell v. State, 341 S.W.3d 526, 527–28 (Tex. 

App.––Fort Worth 2011, no pet.).

Similarly, here, Appellant did not assert any objection when the trial court 

sentenced him to ten years’ confinement, nor did he file a motion for new trial 

thereby raising the disproportionality argument that he now asserts in this appeal. 

Consequently, we hold that Appellant has failed to preserve this issue for our

review. See id.; Laboriel-Guity v. State, 336 S.W.3d 754, 756 (Tex. App.––Fort 

Worth 2011, pet. ref’d); Kim, 283 S.W.3d at 475; Wynn v. State, 219 S.W.3d 54, 

61 (Tex. App.––Houston [1st Dist.] 2006, no pet.); Smith v. State, 10 S.W.3d 48, 

 

2

Fraudulent use of identifying information is a second-degree felony, 

punishable by a term of imprisonment of not more than twenty years or less than 

two years. Tex. Penal Code Ann. §§ 12.33(a) (West 2011), 32.51(c)(3) (West

Supp. 2012).
3

49 (Tex. App.––Texarkana 1999, no pet.); see also Mercado v. State, 718 

S.W.2d 291, 296 (Tex. Crim. App. 1986) (“As a general rule, an appellant may 

not assert error pertaining to his sentence or punishment where he failed to 

object or otherwise raise such error in the trial court.”). We overrule Appellant’s 

sole issue and affirm the trial court’s judgment.

LEE GABRIEL

JUSTICE

PANEL: MCCOY, MEIER, and GABRIEL, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: October 11, 2012
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

May 24, 2019

No. 04-18-00103-CV

WESTWIND HOMES d/b/a Westwind Development, G.P.-Laredo, LLC, and Centerpoint 

Energy Resources Corp,

Appellants

v.

Fernando RAMIREZ and Minerva Ramirez,

Appellees

From the 406th Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015CVT003262-D4

Honorable Oscar J. Hale, Jr., Judge Presiding

ORDER

The Court Reporter’s Extension of Time to File Reporter’s Record has been GRANTED. 

The record is due on June 6, 2019. No further extension.

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 24th day of May, 2019.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE,

Clerk of Court
# SUBPART 4.2 – CONTRACT DISTRIBUTION

*(Revised September 9, 2016 through PROCLTR 2016-09)*

**Parent topic:**PART 4 – ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS

## 4.270 Electronic Document Access.

## 4.270-2 Procedures.

(a)(2) Contracting officers will accept or reject contract deficiency reports (CDRs) in EDA within 10 days of submission, and resolve the CDR within 30 days of submission. The DLA Acquisition Operations Division is responsible to track and report performance on a monthly basis to the SPE. Procuring organizations shall track and report monthly to the HCA.
# EUR-Lex - 31974D0358 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31974D0358

**74/358/EEC: Commission Decision of 13 June 1974 exempting Ireland from applying to certain species the Council Directive of 29 September 1970 on the marketing of vegetable seed (Only the English text is authentic) **

*
Official Journal L 196 , 19/07/1974 P. 0015 - 0015 *

COMMISSION DECISION of 13 June 1974 exempting Ireland from applying to certain species the Council Directive of 29 September 1970 on the marketing of vegetable seed (Only the English text is authentic) (74/358/EEC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community;

Having regard to the Council Directive of 29 September 1970 (1) on the marketing of vegetable seed, as last amended by the Council Directive of 11 December 1973 (2), and in particular Article 42 (a) and (b) thereof;

Having regard to the request made by Ireland;

Whereas chervil, asparagus, spinach beet, chard, water melon, fennel and scorzonera or black salsify seed have no significance for Ireland although they are produced or at least marketed there in insignificant quantities ; whereas the Directive makes it possible to grant exemption for the species concerned, and at the same time does not lay down any particular requirements;

Whereas, moreover, kohlrabi and corn-salad or lamb's lettuce are not normally cultivated in Ireland ; whereas the seeds of these species are not propagated or marketed there;

Whereas these conditions have held for sometime, it is appropriate to exempt Ireland from applying the provisions of the Directive to these latter species also;

Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the Opinion of the Standing Committee on Seeds and Propagating Material for Agriculture, Horticulture and Forestry,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Ireland is exempted from applying the Council Directive of 29 September 1970 on the marketing of vegetable seed, with the exception of the provisions of Article 16 (1) and of Article 30 (1), to the species listed below: (a) Anthriscus cerefolium (L.) Hoffm. - chervil.

(b) Asparagus officinalis L. - asparagus.

(c) Beta vulgaris L. var. cycla (L.) Ulrich - spinach beet, chard.

(d) Brassica oleracea L. var. gongylodes L. - kohlrabi.

(e) Citrullus vulgaris L. - water melon.

(f) Foeniculum vulgare P. Mill. - fennel.

(g) Scorzonera hispanica L. - scorzonera or black salsify.

(h) Valerianella locusta (L.) Betcke (V. olitoria Polt.) - corn-salad or lamb's lettuce.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to Ireland.

Done at Brussels, 13 June 1974.

For the Commission

The President

François-Xavier ORTOLI (1)OJ No L 225, 12.10.1970, p. 7. (2)OJ No L 356, 27.12.1973, p. 79
H. Res. 1059 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

September 13, 2018. 

Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall 

be in order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 3798) to 

amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the 30- 

hour threshold for classification as a full-time employee for 

purposes of the employer mandate in the Patient Protection 

and Affordable Care Act and replace it with 40 hours. All 

points of order against consideration of the bill are waived. 

An amendment in the nature of a substitute consisting of the 

text of Rules Committee Print 115–84 shall be considered as 

adopted. The bill, as amended, shall be considered as read. 

All points of order against provisions in the bill, as amended, 

are waived. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill, as amended, and on any further amendment 

thereto, to final passage without intervening motion except: 

(1) one hour of debate equally divided and controlled by the 

chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on 

Ways and Means; and (2) one motion to recommit with or 

without instructions. 
2 

•HRES 1059 EH 

SEC. 2. Upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in 

order to consider the conference report to accompany the bill 

(H.R. 5895) making appropriations for energy and water development and related agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2019, and for other purposes. All points of order 

against the conference report and against its consideration 

are waived. The conference report shall be considered as read. 

The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the 

conference report to its adoption without intervening motion 

except: (1) one hour of debate; and (2) one motion to recommit if applicable. 

SEC. 3. On any legislative day during the period from 

September 17, 2018, through September 24, 2018— 

(a) the Journal of the proceedings of the previous 

day shall be considered as approved; and 

(b) the Chair may at any time declare the House 

adjourned to meet at a date and time, within the limits 

of clause 4, section 5, article I of the Constitution, to 

be announced by the Chair in declaring the adjournment. 

SEC. 4. The Speaker may appoint Members to perform 

the duties of the Chair for the duration of the period addressed by section 3 of this resolution as though under clause 

8(a) of rule I. 
3 

•HRES 1059 EH 

SEC. 5. Each day during the period addressed by section 

3 of this resolution shall not constitute a legislative day for 

purposes of clause 7 of rule XIII. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
2901.707 Signatory authority.       A class justification for other than full and open competition must be approved in writing by the same approval authority as for individual justifications in accordance with FAR 6.304(a). The approval level must be determined by the estimated total value of the class.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 2901.7 - Determinations and Findings
`[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 619 Reported in House (RH)]







                                                 House Calendar No. 133
109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 619

                          [Report No. 109-348]

 Providing for consideration of the resolution (H. Res. 612 expressing 
the commitment of the House of Representatives to achieving victory in 
                                 Iraq.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

            December 16 (legislative day, December 15), 2005

     Mr. Cole, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION


 
 Providing for consideration of the resolution (H. Res. 612 expressing 
the commitment of the House of Representatives to achieving victory in 
                                 Iraq.

    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order without intervention of any point of order to consider in the 
House the resolution (H. Res. 612) expressing the commitment of the 
House of Representatives to achieving victory in Iraq. The resolution 
shall be considered as read. The previous question shall be considered 
as ordered on the resolution and preamble to final adoption without 
intervening motion or demand for division of the question except: (1) 
one hour of debate equally divided and controlled by the chairman and 
ranking minority member of the Committee on International Relations; 
and (2) one motion to recommit which may not contain instructions.
    Sec. 2. On the first legislative day of the second session of the 
One Hundred Ninth Congress, the House shall not conduct organizational 
or legislative business.
                                                 House Calendar No. 133

109th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                              H. RES. 619

                          [Report No. 109-348]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 Providing for consideration of the resolution (H. Res. 612 expressing 
the commitment of the House of Representatives to achieving victory in 
                                 Iraq.

_______________________________________________________________________

            December 16 (legislative day, December 15), 2005

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed`