alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 63
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 63 appear at 81 FR 86909, Dec. 2, 2016.

§ 63.73 Reports of deficiencies. ( a ) DOE shall promptly notify the Commission of each deficiency found in the characteristics of the Yucca Mountain site, and design, and construction of the geologic repository operations area that, were it to remain uncorrected, could— ( 1 ) Adversely affect safety at any future time;
( 2 ) Represent a significant deviation from the design criteria and design basis stated in the design application; or
( 3 ) Represent a deviation from the conditions stated in the terms of a construction authorization or the license, including license specifications.
( b ) DOE shall implement a program for evaluating and reporting deviations and failures to comply, to identify defects and failures to comply associated with substantial safety hazards, based on the applicable requirements in 10 CFR 50.55(e) as it applies to the construction authorization and design of the geologic repository operations area at the Yucca Mountain site.
( c ) DOE shall implement a program of reporting specific events and conditions that is the same as that specified in 10 CFR 72.75.
( d ) The requisite notification must be as specified in the applicable regulation. By an appropriate method listed in § 63.4 of this chapter, written reports must be submitted to NRC addressed: ATTN: Document Control Desk; Director, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards; U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-001; and to the NRC onsite representative. DOE shall also furnish the report to the appropriate NRC Regional Office shown in appendix D to part 20 of this chapter.
[66 FR 55792, Nov. 2, 2001, as amended at 68 FR 58815, Oct. 10, 2003]
1

Plaintiff is advised that his opposition should simply, clearly and concisely respond to the

allegations and arguments presented in Defendant’s written report. Plaintiff is not required to cite to legal

authority in his opposition. 

 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

 ____________________________

JAMES TYRONE EDWARDS, *

#244 859

Plaintiff, *

v. * 3:06-CV-740-MHT

SGT. MOORE, et al., *

Defendants. *

 _____________________________

ORDER ON MOTION

Upon consideration of Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time, and for good cause,

it is ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time (Doc. No. 24) is GRANTED; and

2. Plaintiff is GRANTED an extension from February 16, 2007 to March 19, 2007

to file his response to Defendants' written report. Absent extraordinary circumstances, NO

further requests for additional time to file an opposition shall be entertained by the court.1

DONE, this 14th day of February 2007.

 /s/Susan Russ Walker 

SUSAN RUSS WALKER

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-00740-MHT-SRW Document 25 Filed 02/14/2007 Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1181 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
H. Res. 1181

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                     December 20, 2018.
    Resolved, That the requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII for a two-thirds 
vote to consider a report from the Committee on Rules on the same day it is 
presented to the House is waived with respect to any resolution reported through 
the legislative day of December 24, 2018.
    Sec. 2.  It shall be in order at any time through the calendar day of 
December 23, 2018, for the Speaker to entertain motions that the House suspend 
the rules as though under clause 1 of rule XV. The Speaker or his designee shall 
consult with the Minority Leader or her designee on the designation of any 
matter for consideration pursuant to this section.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
2007-1648.

#### State v. Fleming.

Cuyahoga App. No. 88442, 2007-Ohio-3625. Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law No. Ill; cause held for the decision in 2007-0651, *State v. Cabrales,*Hamilton App. No. C-050682, 2007-*1438Ohio-857; and briefing schedule stayed.

Pfeifer, O’Donnell, and Cupp, JJ., dissent.
#### § 719.2 What are the definitions of terms used in this part?

For purposes of this part:

*Alternative dispute resolution* includes, but is not limited to, processes such as mediation, neutral evaluation, mini-trials and arbitration.

*Contractor* means any person or entity with whom the Department contracts for the acquisition of goods or services.

*Covered contracts* means those contracts described in § 719.3 of this part.

*Days* means calendar days.

*Department* means the Department of Energy (DOE), including the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA).

*Department Counsel* means the attorney in the DOE or NNSA field office, or Headquarters office, designated as the contracting officer's representative and point of contact for a contractor or for Department retained legal counsel, for purposes of this part.

*General Counsel* means the DOE General Counsel for DOE legal matters and the NNSA General Counsel for NNSA legal matters.

*Legal costs* means, but is not limited to, administrative expenses associated with the provision of legal services by retained legal counsel; the costs of legal services provided by retained legal counsel; the costs of the services, if the services are procured in connection with a legal matter, of accountants, consultants, experts or others retained by the contractor or by retained legal counsel; and any similar costs incurred by retained legal counsel or in connection with the services of retained legal counsel.

*Legal Management Plan* means a document required by subpart B of this part describing the contractor's practices for managing legal costs and legal matters for which it procures the services of retained legal counsel.

*Litigation* means a proceeding arising under or related to a contract between the contractor and the Department to which the contractor is a party in a State, tribal, territorial, foreign, or federal court or before an administrative body or an arbitrator.

*Retained legal counsel* means a licensed attorney working in the private sector who is retained by a contractor or the Department to provide legal services.

*Retrospective insurance* means any insurance policy under which the premium is not fixed but is subject to adjustments to reimburse the insurance carrier for actual losses incurred or paid (e.g. claims, settlements, damages, and legal costs). Retrospective insurance includes service-type insurance policies as described in 48 CFR 928.370.

*Settlement agreement* means a written agreement between a contractor and one or more parties pursuant to which one or more parties waives the right to pursue a legal claim in exchange for something of value.

*Significant matters* means legal matters involving significant issues as determined by Department Counsel and identified to a contractor in writing, and any legal matters where the amount of any legal costs, over the life of the matter, is expected to exceed $100,000.

*Staffing and Resource Plan* means a statement prepared in accordance with subpart B of this part by retained legal counsel that describes the method for managing a Significant Matter in litigation.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 247 (Monday, December 27, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 81212]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-32471]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-570-888]


Floor--Standing Metal--Top Ironing Tables and Certain Parts 
Thereof from the People's Republic of China: Extension of Time Limit 
for Final Results of Administrative Review

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

DATES: Effective Date: December 27, 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Heaney or Robert James, AD/CVD 
Operations, Office 7, Import Administration, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and 
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
4475 or (202) 482-0649, respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On September 14, 2010, the Department of 
Commerce (the Department) published the preliminary results of its 
2007-2008 administrative review of the antidumping duty order of floor-
standing, metal-top ironing tables and certain parts thereof from the 
People's Republic of China. See Floor-Standing, Metal-Top Ironing 
Tables and Certain Parts Thereof From the People's Republic of China: 
Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review 75 FR 
55759 (September 14, 2010). The current deadline for the final results 
of this review is January 12, 2011.

Extension of Time Limit for Final Results

    Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the 
Act) requires the Department to issue the final results of this 
administrative review within 120 days after the date on which the 
preliminary results were published in the Federal Register. However, if 
it is not practicable to complete the review within this time period, 
the Department may extend the time period to issue the final results. 
See section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h)(1).
    The Department finds that it is not practicable to complete this 
review within the original time frame. In order to fully evaluate the 
issues raised by all interested parties concerning the proper source of 
financial ratios, the correct method for calculating labor rates and 
other case issues, we are extending the time frame for completion of 
this review. Consequently, in accordance with section 751(2)(3)(A) of 
the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h)(2), the Department is extending the time 
period for issuing the final results of review by 60 days. Therefore, 
the final results will be due no later than March 13, 2011. As March 
13, 2011 falls on a Sunday, our final results will be issued no later 
than Monday March 14, 2011.
    This notice is published in accordance with section 771(i) of the 
Act.

    Dated: December 20, 2010.
Christian Marsh,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Operations.
[FR Doc. 2010-32471 Filed 12-23-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-50450

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JACKIE LENARD,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. MO-94-CR-116

- - - - - - - - - -

February 24, 1997

Before SMITH, EMILIO M. GARZA, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Jackie Lenard appeals the sentence imposed by the district

court upon revocation of his term of supervised release. This

court will uphold a sentence imposed following the revocation of

a term of supervised release unless it was in violation of law or

was plainly unreasonable. United States v. Mathena, 23 F.3d 87,

89, 93-94 (5th Cir. 1994). Lenard argues that the sentence was

plainly unreasonable.
No. 96-50450

- 2 -

Lenard’s sentence was not unlawful as it was within the

statutory maximum upon revocation of supervised release for a

defendant whose underlying offense was a Class C felony. See 18

U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3); see also Mathena, 23 F.3d at 94. Nor was

Lenard’s sentence “plainly unreasonable” as the district court

determined that Lenard’s multiple and varied violations indicated

his intent not to abide by the terms of his supervised release.

AFFIRMED.
IV 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 492 

Mourning the loss of life caused by the earthquake that occurred on October 

8, 2005, in Pakistan and India, expressing the condolences of the American people to the families of the victims, and urging assistance to 

those affected. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 17, 2005 

Mr. HYDE (for himself, Mr. LANTOS, Mr. LEACH, Mr. FALEOMAVAEGA, Mr. 

BURTON of Indiana, Mr. ACKERMAN, Ms. ROS-LEHTINEN, Mr. CROWLEY, and Mr. MENENDEZ) submitted the following resolution; which was 

referred to the Committee on International Relations 

RESOLUTION 

Mourning the loss of life caused by the earthquake that 

occurred on October 8, 2005, in Pakistan and India, 

expressing the condolences of the American people to 

the families of the victims, and urging assistance to 

those affected. 

Whereas on October 8, 2005, a powerful earthquake measuring 7.6 on the Richter Scale occurred in Pakistan and 

India, centered on the city of Muzaffarabad; 

Whereas the earthquake caused severe damage in both Pakistan and India; 

Whereas the earthquake and continuing aftershocks have 

caused more than 50,000 deaths, resulted in serious inju-
2 

•HRES 492 IH 

ries to additional tens of thousands of people, and left between 2.5 and 3 million homeless as winter in the affected mountainous region approaches; 

Whereas millions of people throughout the affected region 

currently lack clean water, food, proper sanitation, basic 

healthcare, adequate shelter, and other necessities, thereby increasing the risk of additional suffering and death; 

and 

Whereas the United States and donors from at least 30 other 

countries have, to date, pledged several hundred million 

dollars in emergency and long-term reconstruction assistance, and have begun to deliver humanitarian supplies to 

survivors of the earthquake: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) mourns the tragic loss of life and horren3 dous suffering caused by the earthquake that oc4 curred on October 8, 2005, in Pakistan and India; 

5 (2) expresses the deepest condolences of the 

6 American people to the families, communities, and 

7 governments of the tens of thousands of individuals 

8 who lost their lives in this earthquake; 

9 (3) welcomes and commends the prompt inter10 national humanitarian response to the earthquake by 

11 the governments of many countries, the United Na12 tions and other international organizations, and non13 governmental organizations; 

14 (4) expresses gratitude and respect for the cou15 rageous and committed work of all individuals pro-
3 

•HRES 492 IH 

1 viding aid, relief and assistance, including United 

2 States civilian and military personnel, who are work3 ing to save lives and provide relief in the devastated 

4 areas; and 

5 (5) supports the actions to assist the victims 

6 taken by the President and the Government of the 

7 United States to provide all appropriate assistance 

8 to the governments and people of the affected re9 gion. 

Æ
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Tetra Technologies, Inc. v. David Alleman and Alleman Consulting,

LLC

Appellate case number: 01

- 19

- 00049

- CV

Trial court case number: 2018

- 66742

Trial court: 269 t h District Court of Harris County

On July 9, 2019, this Court abated this appeal pending the trial court ’ s resolution of a

related matter. Since then

, appellees have filed several status report s in this Court , the most

recent on June 10, 2022

. Th e last s tatus report indicated trial of the related matter , which was

scheduled on the two

- week docket beginning May 16, 2022

, was not reached and has yet to be

res et

.

Appellee s are hereby ordered to file a tenth status report within 9 0 days from the date of

thi s order. The status report should advise t his Court of the status of a ny related trial court

proceedings.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature:

_________ /s/ J ulie Countiss

______________________ Acting individually

Date: Ju ne 23, 2022
# PGI Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation

- PGI Part 227 - TECHNICAL DATA AND ASSOCIATED RIGHTS 
- PGI Part 228 - BONDS AND INSURANCE 
- PGI Part 229 - TAXES 
- PGI Part 230 - COST ACCOUNTING STANDARDS 
- PGI Part 231 - CONTRACT COST PRINCIPLES AND PROCEDURES 
- PGI Part 232 - CONTRACT FINANCING 
- PGI Part 233 - PROTESTS, DISPUTES, AND APPEALS 

**Parent topic:**PGI Subchapter E - GENERAL CONTRACTING REQUIREMENTS
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 62 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                      February 2, 2005.
    Resolved, That the following named Members and Delegates be, and are hereby, 
elected to the following standing committees of the House of Representatives:
            (1) Committee on agriculture.--Mr. Pomeroy, Mr. Boswell, Mr. Larsen 
        of Washington, Mr. Davis of Tennessee, Mr. Chandler.
            (2) Committee on the budget.--Mr. Kind.
            (3) Committee on government reform.--Ms. Norton.
            (4) Committee on resources.--Mr. George Miller of California, Mr. 
        Markey, Mr. DeFazio, Mr. Inslee, Mr. Udall of Colorado, Mr. Cardoza, Ms. 
        Herseth.
            (5) Committee on science.--Ms. Hooley of Oregon (to rank immediately 
        after Ms. Woolsey), Ms. Jackson-Lee of Texas, Ms. Zoe Lofgren of 
        California, Mr. Sherman, Mr. Baird, Mr. Matheson, Mr. Costa, Mr. Al 
        Green of Texas, Mr. Melancon.
            (6) Committee on small business.--Mr. Faleomavaega, Mrs. 
        Christensen, Mr. Davis of Illinois, Mr. Case, Ms. Bordallo, Mr. 
        Grijalva, Mr. Michaud, Ms. Linda T. Sanchez of California, Mr. Barrow, 
        Ms. Bean.
            (7) Committee on veterans' affairs.--Mr. Strickland, Ms. Hooley of 
        Oregon, Mr. Reyes, Ms. Berkley, Mr. Udall of New Mexico.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
# EUR-Lex - 31982R1981 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31982R1981

**Council Regulation (EEC) No 1981/82 of 19 July 1982 drawing up the list of Community regions, in which production aid for hops is granted only to recognized producer groups **

*
Official Journal L 215 , 23/07/1982 P. 0003 - 0004 Finnish special edition: Chapter 3 Volume 15 P. 0113 Spanish special edition: Chapter 03 Volume 25 P. 0326 Swedish special edition: Chapter 3 Volume 15 P. 0113 Portuguese special edition Chapter 03 Volume 25 P. 0326 *

*****

COUNCIL REGULATION (EEC) No 1981/82

of 19 July 1982

drawing up the list of Community regions, in which production aid for hops is granted only to recognized producer groups

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN

COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 1696/71 of 26 July 1971 on the common organization of the market in hops (1), as last amended by the 1979 Act of Accession, and in particular Article 12 (4) thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the Commission,

Whereas Article 12 of Regulation (EEC) No 1696/71 provides for the possibility of granting in certain regions of the Community, production aid only to those recognized producer groups which are capable of ensuring that their members receive a fair income and of achieving rational management of supply; whereas a list of the regions in which these conditions are fulfilled is to be drawn up on the basis of communications from the Member States concerned;

Whereas by Regulation (EEC) No 593/79 (2) the Council drew up a list of these regions;

Whereas, since the entry into force of Regulation (EEC) No 593/79, an examination of the information supplied by the United Kingdom establishes that a new region fulfils these conditions as from the 1982 harvest; whereas, consequently, the list of regions in which production aid for hops is granted only to recognized producer associations needs to be altered; whereas, in order to do this, and for the sake of clarity, Regulation (EEC) No 593/79 should be replaced by this Regulation,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The list of Community regions in which only recognized hop producer groups are eligible for the production aid provided for in Article 12 of Regulation (EEC) No 1696/71 is set out in the Annex. This list shall be valid as from the 1981 harvest for all the indicated regions with the exception of England in respect of which it shall be valid as from the 1982 harvest.

Article 2

Regulation (EEC) No 593/79 is hereby repealed.

Article 3

This Regulation shall enter into force on the third day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 19 July 1982.

For the Council

The President

B. WESTH

(1) OJ No L 175, 4. 8. 1971, p. 1.

(2) OJ No L 78, 30. 3. 1979, p. 7.

ANNEX

List of regions

Bayern

Baden-Wuerttemberg

Rheinland-Pfalz

Ireland

Alsace

England
1337.204 Guidelines for determining

availability of personnel.

The designee authorized to make the determinations described under FAR 37.204 is set forth in

CAM 1301.70.

Parent topic: Subpart 1337.2 - Advisory and Assistance Services
###### Editorial Note on Part 61

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 61 appear at 80 FR 74980, Dec. 1, 2015, and at 81 FR 86909, Dec. 2, 2016.

#### § 61.58 Alternative requirements for waste classification and characteristics.

The Commission may, upon request or on its own initiative, authorize other provisions for the classification and characteristics of waste on a specific basis, if, after evaluation, of the specific characteristics of the waste, disposal site, and method of disposal, it finds reasonable assurance of compliance with the performance objectives in subpart C of this part.
EX-10.2



 Exhibit 10.2 
 



 
 March 5, 2018 

Via Hand Delivery 
 James R. Kibler 

Dear Mr. Kibler: 
 On behalf of Bojangles’
Restaurants, Inc. (the “Company”), this letter will confirm your appointment and agreement to serve as the Interim President and Interim Chief Executive Officer of both the Company and its parent corporation, Bojangles’,
Inc. (the “Parent”), commencing March 5, 2018. 
 During your period of service as Interim President and Interim Chief
Executive Officer (your “Interim Service”), you will report directly to the Board of Directors of the Parent (the “Board”) and perform such duties as may be reasonably assigned to you by the Board. You
will be subject to all Company and Parent policies in effect from time to time, including (without limitation) policies regarding securities trading. While it is anticipated that your Interim Service will last for several months, the Board may
choose to end your Interim Service at any time, whether or not a new Chief Executive Officer has by then been identified. 
 During your Interim Service,
you will be paid base salary at an annualized rate $600,000 per year. Absent a subsequent determination by the Board (or its Compensation Committee), you will not be eligible for an annual bonus or to otherwise participate in cash or equity
incentive programs. You will be eligible to participate in the employee benefit plans generally available to the Company’s salaried employees, subject to the eligibility and other terms of those plans in effect from time to time. Your
employment will be “at-will,” meaning it may be terminated by either you or the Company at any time, for any reason. Upon cessation of your employment for any reason, you will not be entitled to
severance pay or benefits. 
 To acknowledge your agreement with the foregoing, please execute and date this letter in the space provided below and return
the executed original to me. 
 [space intentionally left blank; signature page follows] 







 
			
	Sincerely,
	
	Bojangles’ Restaurants, Inc.
		
	By:	 	/s/ M. John Jordan
		 	 M. John Jordan
 Senior Vice President, Chief
Financial
 Officer and Treasurer



  
  

	
	 Acknowledged and agreed on this
 5th day of
March, 2018:

	
	/s/ James R. Kibler
	James R. Kibler


  
 2