alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

 FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

SEAN WELLS,

Appellant,

v. Case No. 5D17-1257

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

________________________________/

Opinion filed January 26, 2018

Appeal from the Circuit Court 

for Brevard County,

W. David Dugan, Judge.

James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and 

Sean Kevin Gravel, Assistant Public 

Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and Allison Leigh Morris, 

Assistant Attorney General, Daytona 

Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Sean Wells, appeals the trial court’s order revoking his probation and 

sentencing him to thirty months in prison. We affirm, but remand for a corrected order.

The trial court orally found Appellant guilty of violating Condition 1 of his probation 

for failing to report in December 2016 and January 2017. At sentencing, defense counsel 
2

conceded that Appellant qualified as a violent felony offender of special concern, and the 

trial court made the oral pronouncement that Appellant’s release posed a danger to the 

community pursuant to section 948.06(8)(e), Florida Statutes (2016).

On appeal, Appellant argues (1) the finding that he violated his probation was not 

supported by competent, substantial evidence, and (2) the trial court erred by failing to 

include its reasons for finding that he posed a danger to the community in its written order.

We affirm the trial court’s revocation of Appellant’s probation without further 

discussion. However, the State concedes that remand is appropriate for the trial court to 

reduce its orally pronounced reasons for finding that Appellant presents a danger to the 

community to writing. See Bell v. State, 150 So. 3d 1214 (Fla. 5th DCA 2014); see also

Arnone v. State, 204 So. 3d 556, 557 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016) (“[W]here a court orally 

pronounces a reason, consistent with one or more of the factors listed under section 

948.06(8)(e)1., for its finding that the defendant, as a violent felony offender of special 

concern, poses a danger to the community, but fails to provide written reasons for its 

finding, the proper remedy is to affirm the revocation of the defendant’s probation, but 

remand for entry of a written order conforming to the court’s oral pronouncement.”). 

Similarly, we note that although the trial court orally pronounced its finding that Appellant 

violated probation, the written order revoking probation does not specify which condition 

Appellant violated. See Brown v. State, 225 So. 3d 399, 400 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017). Thus,

on remand, the trial court should enter a corrected order with appropriate written findings. 

AFFIRMED AND REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

PALMER, WALLIS and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.
```

[106th Congress Public Law 267]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

<DOC>
[DOCID: f:publ267.106]

Public Law 106-267
106th Congress

                                 An Act

 
 To designate the United States border station located in Pharr, Texas, 
as the ``Kika de la Garza United States Border Station''. <<NOTE: Sept. 
                       22, 2000 -  [H.R. 1901]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The United States border station located in Pharr, Texas, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Kika de la Garza United States Border 
Station''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the border station referred to in section 
1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Kika de la Garza United 
States Border Station''.

    Approved September 22, 2000.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 1901:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 106-586 (Comm. on Transportation and Infrastructure).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 146 (2000):
            May 3, considered and passed House.
            Sept. 13, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
IV 

House Calendar No. 76 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 394 

[Report No. 109–200] 

Waiving points of order against consideration of the conference report to 

accompany the bill (H.R. 6) to ensure jobs for our future with secure, 

affordable, and reliable energy. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 27, 2005 

Mr. HASTINGS of Washington, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered 

to be printed 

RESOLUTION 

Waiving points of order against consideration of the conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 6) to ensure 

jobs for our future with secure, affordable, and reliable 

energy. 

1 Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it 

2 shall be in order to consider the conference report to ac3 company the bill (H.R. 6) to ensure jobs for our future 

4 with secure, affordable, and reliable energy. All points of 

5 order against the conference report and against its consid-
2 

HRES 394 RH 

1 eration are waived. The conference report shall be consid2 ered as read. 

House Calendar No. 76 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 394 

[Report No. 109–200] 

RESOLUTION 

Waiving points of order against consideration of the 

able, and reliable energy. to ensure jobs for our future with secure, affordconference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 6) 

JULY 27, 2005 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed
**EXHIBIT 32.2CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

       In connection with the quarterlyreport of CNB Corporation on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2011 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, L.Ford Sanders, II, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of CNBCorporation, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002that:
| 1. | The  above-listed Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)  or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                 |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|    |                                                                                                                                                                    |
| 2. | The  information contained in the above-listed Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all  material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the  Company. |
| Date:  May  10, 2011 | /s/L. Ford Sanders, II                                                               L. Ford Sanders,  II  Executive Vice President, Treasurer, and Chief Financial Officer |
|--------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        |
PGI 247.301 General.

Transportation guidance relating to Governmentwide commercial purchase card purchases is

available in the Department of Defense Government Charge Card Guidebook for Establishing and

Managing Purchase, Travel, and Fuel Card Programs, Appendix C, at

https://www.acq.osd.mil/asda/dpc/ce/pc/docs-guides.html .

Parent topic: PGI 247.3 -TRANSPORTATION IN SUPPLY CONTRACTS
| ***USDA    Rural Utilities Service    Electric Program*******
  
 

 

There are no proposed regulations at this time; therefore, no    comments to publish currently.  |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
IV 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 458 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1436) to provide for reconciliation 

pursuant to title II of the concurrent resolution on the budget for 

fiscal year 2017. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 19, 2017 

Mr. GARRETT (for himself, Mr. JORDAN, Mr. DESJARLAIS, Mr. BROOKS of 

Alabama, Mr. POSEY, Mr. NORMAN, Mr. PERRY, Mr. DUNCAN of South 

Carolina, Mr. AMASH, Mr. GOSAR, Mr. MEADOWS, Mr. JODY B. HICE of 

Georgia, Mr. BIGGS, Mr. BRAT, Mr. BLUM, Mr. BUDD, Mr. MASSIE, and 

Mr. DAVIDSON) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 

the Committee on Rules 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1436) to provide 

for reconciliation pursuant to title II of the concurrent 

resolution on the budget for fiscal year 2017. 

1 Resolved, That immediately upon adoption of this res2 olution, the House shall proceed to the consideration in 

3 the House of the bill (H.R. 1436) to provide for reconcili4 ation pursuant to title II of the concurrent resolution on 

5 the budget for fiscal year 2017. All points of order against 

6 consideration of the bill are waived. The bill shall be con7 sidered as read. All points of order against provisions in 


rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

HRES 458 IH 

1 the bill are waived. The previous question shall be consid2 ered as ordered on the bill and on any further amendment 

3 thereto to final passage without intervening motion except: 

4 (1) one hour of debate equally divided and controlled by 

5 Representative Garrett of Virginia and the Minority Lead6 er or their respective designees; and (2) one motion to re7 commit. 

8 SEC. 2. Clause 1(c) of rule XIX shall not apply to 

9 the consideration of H.R. 1436. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
PGI 225.802-70 Contracts for performance

outside the United States and Canada.

When a contracting office anticipates placement of a contract for performance outside the United

States and Canada, and the contracting office is not under the jurisdiction of a command for the

country involved, the contracting office shall maintain liaison with the cognizant contract

administration office (CAO) during preaward negotiations and postaward administration. The

cognizant CAO can be found at http://home.dcma.mil/cassites/district.htm. The CAO will provide

pertinent information for contract negotiations, effect appropriate coordination, and obtain required

approvals for the performance of the contract.

Parent topic: PGI 225.802 Procedures.
THE WEB OF LIFE

D

id you know that there are many more kinds of insects on earth than any other kind of 

living creature? It's hard to imagine, but 95% of all the animal species on the earth are 

insects! Millions of insects can exist in a single acre of land! Over one million species 

Draw and color a picture with a critter you 

read about in this book. 

Show: what it eats 

what eats it 

if it helps something grow 

Add other organisms to your picture to make 

a web of life. Think: • What does it eat?

• Does it help

something grow?

• Is it food for another

creature? 

have been discovered by scientists, and they think that there might be ten times that many 

that have not been named yet! All of these insects are part of what is called the "web of life." 

Everything has a place

in the web of life.

Tell a friend or parent 

what this means. 

22 United States Environmental Protection Agency 2003
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132

*Product ingredient source information may be entitled to confidential treatment*
133
134
135
136

*Product ingredient source information may be entitled to confidential treatment*
137

*Product ingredient source information may be entitled to confidential treatment*
138

*Product ingredient source information may be entitled to confidential treatment*
139
140
 

______________________________________________________________ 

Page 141 is not included in this copy. 

Pages through are not included in this copy. 

_________________________________________________________________ 

The material not included contains the following type of 

information: 

_____ Identity of product inert ingredients. 

__ __ Identity of product impurities. 

__ __ Description of the product manufacturing process. 

__ __ Description of quality control procedures. 

__ __ Identity of the source of product ingredients. 

_____ Sales or other commercial/financial information. 

_____ A draft product label. 

__X__ The product confidential statement of formula. 

_____ Information about a pending registration action. 

__ __ FIFRA registration data. 

__ __ The document is a duplicate of page(s) _ . 

_____ The document is not responsive to the request. 

__ __ Internal deliberative information. 

__ __ Privileged attorney-client communication. 

__ __ Claimed Confidential by submitter upon submission to the 

 Agency.
Exhibit 13.(a).2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. Section 1350





In connection with the filing of the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the period ended December 31, 2014 (the “Report”) by Mazor Robotics Ltd. (the "Company"), the undersigned, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:





(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Sharon Levita

Sharon Levita

Chief Financial Officer





April 28, 2015
#### In re INTERBOROUGH RAPID TRANSIT CO.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

July 10, 1914.)

In the matter of the Interborough Rapid Transit Company (Webster Avenue Line, West Farms Subway Connection).

No opinion. Application granted. Settle order on notice.
PGI 216.401 General.       (c) Incentive contracts. DoD has established the Award and Incentive Fees Community of Practice (CoP) under the leadership of the Defense Acquisition University (DAU). The CoP serves as the repository for all related materials including policy information, related training courses, examples of good award fee arrangements, and other supporting resources. The CoP is available on the DAU Acquisition Community Connection at https://acc.dau.mil/awardandincentivefees. Additional information can be found on the MAX website maintained by the Office of Management and Budget at: https://max.omb.gov.          (e) Award-fee contracts.          (i) It is DoD policy to utilize objective criteria, whenever possible, to measure contract performance. In cases where an award-fee contract must be used due to lack of objective criteria, the contracting officer shall consult with the program manager and the fee determining official when developing the award-fee plan. Award-fee criteria shall be linked directly to contract cost, schedule, and performance outcomes objectives.          (ii) Award fees must be tied to identifiable interim outcomes, discrete events or milestones, as much as possible. Examples of such interim milestones include timely completion of preliminary design review, critical design review, and successful system demonstration. In situations where there may be no identifiable milestone for a year or more, consideration should be given to apportioning some of the award fee pool for a predetermined interim period of time based on assessing progress toward milestones. In any case, award fee provisions must clearly explain how a contractor’s performance will be evaluated.          (iii) The head of the contracting activity for each defense agency shall retain the D&F for (a) all acquisition category (ACAT) I or II) programs, and (b) all non-ACAT I or II contracts with an estimated value of $50 million or more. The head of the contracting activity shall forward the D&Fs for ACAT I programs to Defense Pricing and Contracting/Contract Policy directorate DPC/CP) within 1 month of the end of the quarter. Copies of D&Fs on all contracts shall also be included in the contract file.    **Parent topic:** PGI 216.4 -INCENTIVE CONTRACTS
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, September 27, 2017. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, September 27, 2017 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A18D0082. DUNWOODY PLAZA PARTNERS, LLC et al. v. JAY MARKOWITZ.
Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of this order. The Clerk of State Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals.
LC NUMBERS: 16A61705
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Brett D. Davis, certify that:

 

1.                                      I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of CNH Equipment Trust 2013-A (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

 

2.                                      Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.                                      Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4.                                      I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and

 

5.                                      All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas.

 

----

 

March 29, 2016

 

 
|   | By:    | /s/ Brett D. Davis                                               |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Name:  | Brett D. Davis                                                   |
|   | Title: | President (senior   officer in charge of the servicing function) |

 

----
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15**  **- 7607** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. MATTHEW EUGENE BARRENTINE , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Florence
. R. Bryan Harwell , District Judge. ( 4:09

- cr - 00953

- RBH

- 1; 4:15

- cv - 03953

- RBH; 4:12

- cv - 00797

- RBH )

Submitted : February 25, 2016 Decided: March 1, 2016

Before SHEDD and HARRIS , Circuit Judges , and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge
.
Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Matthew Eugene Barrentine, Appellant Pro Se. Carrie Fisher Sherard, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Matthew Eugene Barrentine seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 ( 2012 ) motion as unauthorized and successive . The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (B) (20 12 ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (20 12 ). When the district court denies relie f on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a con stitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Barrentine has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal3 contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
###### Editorial Note on Part 72

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 72 appear at 80 FR 74981, Dec. 1, 2015, and at 81 FR 86910, Dec. 2, 2016.

#### § 72.8 Denial of licensing by Agreement States.

Agreement States may not issue licenses covering the storage of spent fuel and reactor-related GTCC waste in an ISFSI or the storage of spent fuel, high-level radioactive waste, and reactor-related GTCC waste in an MRS.

[66 FR 51839, Oct. 11, 2001]