alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                            1493
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     1440
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      16643
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                             514
<DEPRECIATION>                                     478
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   24164
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                          11933
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            30
<OTHER-SE>                                        8283
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     24164
<SALES>                                          11486
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 11569
<CGS>                                             9685
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    11250
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    319
<INCOME-TAX>                                       131
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                188
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       188
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .07
<FN>
<F1>  The Company does not present a classified balance sheet
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Docket No: FAA-2012-0885 

Directorate ID: 2012-NE-18 

Disposition Comments 

Originating Office Tracking No.: SP3330EN-E 

Next Step: RAN 0 SNPRM 

D These comments are in 

response to an SNPRM 

~ No Comments/Only Supportive Comments Received -If this box is checked, no signatures are 

required. 

No Has the referenced service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? If yes, 

list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously 

published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance. 

Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of 

each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues 

from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and 

describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA-IR-M-8040.1C Chapter 9. 

ISSUE 1: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD: 

If NO, we don't agree because 

ISSUE 2: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s ): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD: 

Page I of3 
IfNO, we don't agree because 

For additional issues, double-click here 

Page 2 of3 
Signature Section 

Signature indicates concurrence with this action. 

Originating Office Tracking No.: SP3330EN-E 

Printed Name: Frederick Zink 

a ~ ( ~ ( €/j"J J - no CoMN'O\\-sj p '/(! Branch Manager 

t\ \1'\\ ~\ 1-

Date 

Page 3 of3
1 Attachment

Nick
-

Thanks for your cooperation and understanding of ou r concerns regarding the method for determining the MACT floors for the applicable Zeon Polymers & Resins I (Subpart U) processes. Since we last spoke, we have been reviewing and assembling the requested data for our KY Plant and its NBR processes. Wednesday evening, I sent the confidential nitrile rubber and latex productio n data to EPA's Roberto Morales by overnight U.S. E xpress Mail. He should have received the information yeste rday. The data covers the four years prior to 2009. 2009 production data was sent to EPA last year as part o f our initial 114 Questionnaire response.

On the attached sheet, we are providing the acrylon itrile and butadiene emissions for 2005-2009. As yo u approved, we are providing the total emissions for each constituent for all "back- end" nitrile manufacturing vents. In reviewing EC/R's memo to EPA of 7/19/10, we note d that some NBR back-end vents were omitted from th e total. Hence, we are providing the correct totals f or 2009. A listing is also provided of all KY Plant back-end NBR process vents to help minimize any confusion.

We are still compiling and analyzing the data for o ur MS Plant and its epichlorohydrin rubber processe s. The benefit of averaging data from additional recent ye ars of manufacturing is not apparent in this case. We would suggest you first review the KY Plant data and prop ose a method of its use in the setting of a reasona ble NBR back-end standard. At that time, we could discuss w ith you the challenge with the MS Plant data and ex plore any viable alternative means of setting reasonable back -end standards that will provide sufficient operati onal flexibility in our epichlorohydrin rubber manufactu ring.

Tom Herman, P.E. Corporate Environmental Manager Zeon Chemicals L.P. 502-775-7719

(See attached file: MACT 114 Emissions KY 1-11.docx ) "This transmission including any attachments is con fidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, or their agent, you are hereby notified that reading, disclosing, copying, distrib uting or using any information contained in this transmission is s trictly prohibited. If you have received this trans mission in error, please immediately notify the sender or forw ard the e-mail to abuse@zeonchemicals.com and destr oy the transmission. Thank you for your assistance."

Supplemental MACT Data
Tom Herman

to: Nick Parsons 01/28/2011 09:26 AM Cc: Bill Simpson, Bob Barlow Show Details

History: This message has been forwarded.

MACT 114 Emissions KY 1

- 11.docx 

### Page 1 of 1

3/31/2011 file://C:\Documents and Settings\nparsons\Local Set tings\Temp\notesFCBCEE\~web2059.

...
1909.406-3 Procedures.       (a) *Investigation and referral.* Any officer of the Board who becomes aware of circumstances which may serve as a basis for a debarment, suspension, or ineligibility shall report the circumstances by memorandum to the Board Procurement Executive for consideration of debarment, suspension or ineligibility action.          (b) *Decision-making process.*          (1)  			Contractors shall be given the opportunity to submit, in person, in writing, or through a representative, information and arguments in opposition to a proposed debarment or suspension. All rebuttals shall be addressed to the Board Procurement Executive. However, if a response to the proposed debarment or suspension is not received by the Board Procurement Executive within 30 calendar days of receipt of the notice, the debarment or suspension shall become final.          (2) If a contractor, or a representative, desires to present information and arguments in person to the Board Procurement Executive, an oral presentation will be held within 20 calendar days of receipt of the request, unless a longer period of time is requested by the contractor. Hearings will be held before a three-person fact-finding board composed of one member each from the Office of General Counsel and Congressional Liaison, the Bureau of Management, and the Office of Contracts, other than the initiating officer. The fact-finding board shall deliver written findings to the Board Procurement Executive (together with a transcription of the proceedings, if made) within 10 calendar days after the hearing. The findings shall resolve any facts in dispute based on a preponderance of the evidence presented and determine whether a cause for debarment or suspension exists.          (c) *Debarring/suspending official's decision.* The debarring/suspending official's final decision shall be made in writing in accordance with FAR 9.406-3 and notice of the decision will be given in accordance with FAR 9.406-3. A copy of the notice shall be given to the affected agency component.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 1909.4 - Debarment, Suspension, and Ineligibility
#### § 706.31 Clearance of conciliators and arbitrators.

Conciliators and arbitrators who are regularly assigned to DOE cases may be processed for “Q” clearance at the discretion of the local DOE manager, either on the manager's initiative or at the request of a contractor.
EX-35.11
(logo) WELLS FARGO

Corporate Trust Services

MAC R1204-010
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045

Tel: 410 884 2000
Fax: 410 715 2380

RBS Commercial Funding Inc.
600 Washington Boulevard
Stamford, Connecticut 06901

RE: Annual Statement of Compliance for RBS Commercial Funding Inc. Commercial
    Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2013-C11

Per the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of February 1, 2013 (the
"Agreement"), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank,
N.A., as Certificate Administrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows
as of and for the year ending December 31, 2013 (the "Reporting Period"):

(a) A review of Wells Fargo's activities during the Reporting Period and of its
performance under the Agreement has been made under such officer's supervision;
and

(b) To the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo
has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material
respects throughout the Reporting Period.

March 10, 2014


/s/ Brian Smith
BRIAN SMITH
Vice President


Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
#### § 431.226 Energy conservation standards and their effective dates.

Any traffic signal module or pedestrian module manufactured on or after January 1, 2006, shall meet both of the following requirements:

(a) Have a nominal wattage and maximum wattage no greater than:

| | Maximum wattage (at 74 °C) | Nominal wattage (at 25 °C) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Traffic Signal Module Type: | | |
| 12′′ Red Ball | 17 | 11 |
| 8′′ Red Ball | 13 | 8 |
| 12′′ Red Arrow | 12 | 9 |
| 12′′ Green Ball | 15 | 15 |
| 8′′ Green Ball | 12 | 12 |
| 12′′ Green Arrow | 11 | 11 |
| Pedestrian Module Type: | | |
| Combination Walking Man/Hand | 16 | 13 |
| Walking Man | 12 | 9 |
| Orange Hand | 16 | 13 |

(b) Be installed with compatible, electrically connected signal control interface devices and conflict monitoring systems.

[[70 FR 60417](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/70-FR-60417), Oct. 18, 2005, as amended at [71 FR 71374](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/71-FR-71374), Dec. 8, 2006]
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 33 (Friday, February 19, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 7512]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-3234]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

U.S. Customs and Border Protection


Accreditation and Approval of Inspectorate America Corporation, 
as a Commercial Gauger and Laboratory

AGENCY: U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland 
Security.

ACTION: Notice of accreditation and approval of Inspectorate America 
Corporation, as a commercial gauger and laboratory.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to 19 CFR 151.12 and 19 
CFR 151.13, Inspectorate America Corporation, 12211 Port Road, 
Operations Blvd., Seabrook, TX 77586, has been approved to gauge and 
accredited to test petroleum and petroleum products for customs 
purposes, in accordance with the provisions of 19 CFR 151.12 and 19 CFR 
151.13. Anyone wishing to employ this entity to conduct laboratory 
analyses and gauger services should request and receive written 
assurances from the entity that it is accredited or approved by the 
U.S. Customs and Border Protection to conduct the specific test or 
gauger service requested. Alternatively, inquires regarding the 
specific test or gauger service this entity is accredited or approved 
to perform may be directed to the U.S. Customs and Border Protection by 
calling (202) 344-1060. The inquiry may also be sent to 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#741716045a1815161c0534101c075a131b02"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="056667752b6964676d7445616d762b626a73">[email protected]</span></a>. Please reference the Web site listed below for a 
complete listing of CBP approved gaugers and accredited laboratories.
    http://cbp.gov/xp/cgov/import/operations_support/labs_scientific_svcs/commercial_gaugers/.

DATES: The accreditation and approval of Inspectorate America 
Corporation, as commercial gauger and laboratory became effective on 
September 16, 2009. The next triennial inspection date will be 
scheduled for September 2012.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Anthony Malana, Laboratories and 
Scientific Services, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, 1300 
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Suite 1500N, Washington, DC 20229, 202-344-
1060.

    Dated: February 4, 2010.
Ira S. Reese,
Executive Director, Laboratories and Scientific Services.
[FR Doc. 2010-3234 Filed 2-18-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-14-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# EUR-Lex - 31971D0306 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31971D0306

**71/306/EEC: Council Decision of 26 July 1971 setting up an Advisory Committee for Public Works Contracts **

*
Official Journal L 185 , 16/08/1971 P. 0015 - 0015 Finnish special edition: Chapter 6 Volume 1 P. 0110 Danish special edition: Series I Chapter 1971(II) P. 0622 Swedish special edition: Chapter 6 Volume 1 P. 0110 English special edition: Series I Chapter 1971(II) P. 0693 Greek special edition: Chapter 17 Volume 1 P. 0017 Spanish special edition: Chapter 17 Volume 1 P. 0019 Portuguese special edition Chapter 17 Volume 1 P. 0019 *

COUNCIL DECISION of 26 July 1971 setting up an Advisory Committee for Public Works Contracts (71/306/EEC)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community;

Having regard to the proposals from the Commission;

Having regard to the Opinion of the European Parliament 1;

Having regard to the Opinion of the Economic and Social Committee 2;

Whereas the implementation of the measures adopted by the Council in the field of public works contracts may raise problems which it seems desirable to examine in common;

Whereas it is advisable to set up for this purpose a Committee presided over by the Commission and composed of representatives of the Member States belonging to the authorities of those States;

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

An Advisory Committee for Public Works Contracts is hereby set up within the Commission.

Article 2

Without prejudice to the provisions of Articles 169 and 170 of the Treaty, the Committee shall examine regularly, on the initiative of the Commission or at the request of a Member State, problems arising from the application of the measures adopted by the Council with regard to public works contracts, including special cases arising in this field. The Committee shall examine in particular the reasons for which undertakings conforming to the criteria laid down by the Council may not have been consulted or may not have won the contract although they submitted the best tender.

Article 3

The Committee shall be composed of representatives of the Member States belonging to the authorities of those States.

Member States shall appoint as members of the Committee one member and one alternate for each country.

The Committee shall be chaired by an official of the Commission. The Chairman may be assisted by Commission officials. Secretarial services shall be provided by the Commission.

Article 4

The Committee shall be convened by its Chairman either on his own initiative or at the request of one of its members.

Article 5

Committee discussions shall be recorded in minutes.

Article 6

The Committee shall draw up its own rules of procedure.

Done at Brussels, 26 July 1971.

For the Council

The President

A. MORO 1OJ No 62, 12.4.1965, p. 883/65 and 889/65. 2OJ No 13, 29.1.1965, p. 150/65 and OJ No 63, 13.4.1965, p. 929/65.
#### § 460.201 Duct system.

Each manufactured home equipped with a duct system, which may include air handlers and filter boxes, must be sealed to limit total air leakage to less than or equal to four (4) cubic feet per minute per 100 square feet of conditioned floor area at a pressure differential of 0.1 inch w.g. (25 Pascals) across the system. Building framing cavities must not be used as ducts or plenums when directly connected to mechanical systems. The duct total air leakage requirements are adapted from section R403 of the 2021 IECC.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Office of the Secretary

                    The following Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience and Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier  Permits were filed under Subpart B (formerly Subpart Q) of the Department  of Transportation's Procedural Regulations (                    *See*14 CFR 301.201*et. seq.*). The due date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motions To Modify  Scope are set forth below for each application. Following the Answer period  DOT may process the application by expedited procedures. Such procedures  may consist of the adoption of a show-cause order, a tentative order, or in  appropriate cases a final order without further proceedings.                

*Docket Number:*                     DOT-OST-2004-19016.                

*Date Filed:*                     December 2, 2010.                

*Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motion To Modify Scope:*                     December 23, 2010.                

*Description:*                     Application of Jetalliance Flugbeiriebs GmbH d/b/a JAF Airservice requesting renewal  of its exemption authority and for a foreign air carrier permit to engage in: (i) Foreign charter  air transportation of persons, property and mail from any point or points behind any Member  State of the European Union via any point or points in any Member State and via intermediate  points to any point or points in the United States and beyond; (ii) foreign charter air transportation  of persons, property and mail between any point or points in the United States and any point or points  in any member of the European Common Aviation Area; (iii) other charter air transportation; and (iv) transportation authorized by any additional route rights made available to European Community carriers in the future.                

Renee V. Wright,

Program Manager, Docket Operations, Federal Register Liaison.

[FR Doc. 2010-31715 Filed 12-16-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Joseph Arico, Respondent, v. Adam Gallucci Construction Co. et al., Appellants, and Nicodemo Delforte, Doing Business as Niagara Grill, et al., Respondents. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.

Reynolds, J.

Appeal from a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Board holding appellants solely responsible for compensation benefits and medical payments due claimant for the period August 8, 1967 to December 12, 1967. On June 22, 1966 claimant suffered a compensable injury to his back while in the employment of respondent Delforte. After recovery from surgery claimant began light construction work for appellant Gallucci. On August 8, 1967, while working for Gallucei pulling a plumb line, claimant again injured his back requiring surgery and resulting in temporary total disability until claimant was able to return to work on December 12, 1967. The sole issue raised on this appeal is the correctness of the board’s holding that Gallucei was solely responsible for the medical treatment rendered and benefits awarded during the period of claimant’s disability. Of course, this issue is factual and thus the board’s decision must be upheld if it is supported by substantial evidence (Workmen’s Compensation Law, § 23). However, in the instant record there is not only no testimony either by the medical experts or the claimant which states directly, or from which it can *be*inferred, that the second accident was solely responsible for the disability for the period in question but every expert who testified in relation to this issue stated that the first accident was at least partially responsible for the disability. Accordingly, the board’s decision cannot stand, and the matter must be returned to the board to determine the apportionment between Gallucci and Delforte. Decision reversed and claim remitted to the Workmen’s Compensation Board for further proceedings not inconsistent herewith, with costs to appellants against respondents employer and carrier. Herlihy, P. J., Reynolds, Aulisi, Staley, Jr., and Greenblott, JJ., concur in memorandum by Reynolds, J.
#### LUDLAM v. BLOODGOOD et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

November 27, 1914.)

Action by Mary Ludlam against Clara Bloodgood and others.

No opinion. Order modified, by reducing the amount of costs allowed from" $25 to $10, and disbursements, and striking out the award of execution, in the following words, “and that.she have execution therefor,” and, as so modified, such order is affirmed, without costs of this appeal. See, also, 163 App. Div. 863, 146 N. Y. Supp. 1098.