alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### THORNE, Respondent, v. JOHNSON, ADAMS & GRAECEN, Inc., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

November 27, 1914.)

Action by Richard R. Thorne against Johnson, Adams & Graecen, Incorporated.' Joseph F. Murray, of New York City, for appellant. D. R. Almy, of New York City, for respondent.

No opinion. Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event, unless plaintiff stipulates to reduce verdict to the sum of $20,000, in which event the judgment, as so modified, and the order appealed from, is affirmed, without costs. Settle order on notice.
<PAGE>

                                                                  Exhibit 10(p)


                      THIRD AMENDMENT TO PROMISSORY NOTE
                          AND REVISED DEBT AGREEMENT

    This Third Amendment to Promissory Note and Revised Debt Agreement dated
August 3, 1999, does hereby further amend and supplement the terms of that
certain Note dated April 1, 1997, by and between Craig S. Miller, as "Maker"
and Uno Restaurants, Inc., as "Holder," as amended on April 7, 1998 and
September 27, 1998.

    For value received, the undersigned parties agree as follows:

    1.  Section 2.2 of the Note, a copy of which is appended hereto as
Exhibit A for reference, is further amended to provide that the "Maturity
Date" of the Note shall be the earlier to occur of (i) the date on which
Maker's employment with Holder or its affiliates shall terminate, or (ii)
October 1, 2000.

    2.  In all other respects, the Note is hereby ratified, affirmed and
unchanged.

    IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned parties have evidenced their
agreement by written signatures shown below.



Witness:                               MAKER:



/s/ Jeffrey A. Barron                  /s/ Craig S. Miller
--------------------------------       --------------------------------
Printed Name: Jeffrey A. Barron        Craig S. Miller



                                       UNO RESTAURANTS, INC.


                                       By: /s/ Robert M. Vincent
                                           ----------------------------
                                           Robert M. Vincent
                                           Senior Vice President
§ 709.26 Protection of confidentiality of CI evaluation records to include polygraph examination records and other pertinent documentation. ( a ) DOE owns all CI evaluation records, including polygraph examination records and reports and other evaluation documentation.
( b ) DOE maintains all CI evaluation records, including polygraph examination records and other pertinent documentation acquired in conjunction with a counterintelligence evaluation, in a system of records established under the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a).
( c ) DOE must afford the full privacy protection provided by law to information regarding a covered person's refusal to participate in a CI evaluation to include a polygraph examination and the completion of other pertinent documentation.
( d ) With the exception of the polygraph report, all other polygraph examination records are destroyed ninety days after the CI evaluation is completed, provided that a favorable recommendation has been made to grant or continue the access to the position. If a recommendation is made to deny or revoke access to the information or involvement in the activities that justified conducting the CI evaluation, then all of the polygraph examination records are retained until the final resolution of any request for reconsideration by the covered person or the completion of any ongoing investigation.
Editorial Note on Part 55
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 55 appear at 80 FR 74980, Dec. 1, 2015.

§ 55.57 Renewal of licenses. ( a ) The applicant for renewal of a license shall— ( 1 ) Complete and sign Form NRC-398 and include the number of the license for which renewal is sought.
( 2 ) File an original of NRC Form 398 with the appropriate Regional Administrator specified in § 55.5(b).
( 3 ) Provide written evidence of the applicant's experience under the existing license and the approximate number of hours that the licensee has operated the facility.
( 4 ) Provide a statement by an authorized representative of the facility licensee that during the effective term of the current license the applicant has satisfactorily completed the requalification program for the facility for which operator or senior operator license renewal is sought.
( 5 ) Provide evidence that the applicant has discharged the license responsibilities competently and safely. The Commission may accept as evidence of the applicant's having met this requirement a certificate of an authorized representative of the facility licensee or holder of an authorization by which the licensee has been employed.
( 6 ) Provide certification by the facility licensee of medical condition and general health on Form NRC-396, to comply with §§ 55.21, 55.23 and 55.27.
( b ) The license will be renewed if the Commission finds that— ( 1 ) The medical condition and the general health of the licensee continue to be such as not to cause operational errors that endanger public health and safety. The Commission will base this finding upon the certification by the facility licensee as described in § 55.23.
( 2 ) The licensee— ( i ) Is capable of continuing to competently and safely assume licensed duties;
( ii ) Has successfully completed a requalification program that has been approved by the Commission as required by § 55.59; and
( iii ) Has passed the requalification examinations and annual operating tests as required by § 55.59.
( 3 ) There is a continued need for a licensee to operate or for a senior operator to direct operators at the facility designated in the application.
( 4 ) The past performance of the licensee has been satisfactory to the Commission. In making its finding, the Commission will include in its evaluation information such as notices of violations or letters of reprimand in the licensee's docket.
[52 FR 9460, Mar. 25, 1987, as amended at 59 FR 5938, Feb. 9, 1994; 68 FR 58813, Oct. 10, 2003]
§ 71.107 Package design control. ( a ) The licensee, certificate holder, and applicant for a CoC shall establish measures to assure that applicable regulatory requirements and the package design, as specified in the license or CoC for those materials and components to which this section applies, are correctly translated into specifications, drawings, procedures, and instructions. These measures must include provisions to assure that appropriate quality standards are specified and included in design documents and that deviations from standards are controlled. Measures must be established for the selection and review for suitability of application of materials, parts, equipment, and processes that are essential to the functions of the materials, parts, and components of the packaging that are important to safety.
( b ) The licensee, certificate holder, and applicant for a CoC shall establish measures for the identification and control of design interfaces and for coordination among participating design organizations. These measures must include the establishment of written procedures, among participating design organizations, for the review, approval, release, distribution, and revision of documents involving design interfaces. The design control measures must provide for verifying or checking the adequacy of design, by methods such as design reviews, alternate or simplified calculational methods, or by a suitable testing program. For the verifying or checking process, the licensee shall designate individuals or groups other than those who were responsible for the original design, but who may be from the same organization. Where a test program is used to verify the adequacy of a specific design feature in lieu of other verifying or checking processes, the licensee, certificate holder, and applicant for a CoC shall include suitable qualification testing of a prototype or sample unit under the most adverse design conditions. The licensee, certificate holder, and applicant for a CoC shall apply design control measures to the following: ( 1 ) Criticality physics, radiation shielding, stress, thermal, hydraulic, and accident analyses;
( 2 ) Compatibility of materials;
( 3 ) Accessibility for inservice inspection, maintenance, and repair;
( 4 ) Features to facilitate decontamination; and
( 5 ) Delineation of acceptance criteria for inspections and tests.
( c ) The licensee, certificate holder, and applicant for a CoC shall subject design changes, including field changes, to design control measures commensurate with those applied to the original design. Changes in the conditions specified in the CoC require prior NRC approval.
2007-2180.

#### State ex rel. Goldsberry v. Union Cty. Court of Common Pleas.

In Procedendo. On motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss granted. Cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Dennis Vadura, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of AccuPoll Holding
Corp.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions);

(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.


March 14, 2005                                      /s/ Dennis Vadura
                                                    ----------------------------
                                                        Dennis Vadura
                                                        Chief Executive Officer
§ 600.2 Applicability. ( a ) Except as otherwise provided by Federal statute or program rule, this part applies to applications, funding opportunity announcement, and new, continuation, and renewal awards (and any subsequent subawards).
( b ) Any new, continuation, or renewal award (and any subsequent subaward) shall comply with any applicable Federal statute, Federal rule, Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular and Governmentwide guidance in effect as of the date of such award.
( c ) Financial assistance to foreign entities is governed, to the extent appropriate, by this part and by the administrative requirements and cost principles applicable to their respective recipient type, e.g, governmental, non-profit, commercial.
[61 FR 7166, Feb. 26, 1996, as amended at 74 FR 44275, Aug. 28, 2009]
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q
FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   Sep-30-1999
<CASH>                                         9,969
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               7,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    54,624
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         52,206
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           0
<LOANS>                                        249,578
<ALLOWANCE>                                    2,587
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 384,993
<DEPOSITS>                                     317,239
<SHORT-TERM>                                   12,366
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            4,380
<LONG-TERM>                                    15,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       9,152
<OTHER-SE>                                     26,856
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 384,993
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                15,305
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              4,783
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               56
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               20,144
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             7,916
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             8,594
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          11,550
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  220
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                8,853
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                5,023
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     5,023
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   3,499
<EPS-BASIC>                                  .96
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .92
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                 4.47
<LOANS-NON>                                    716
<LOANS-PAST>                                   393
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                               0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                990
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               2,517
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  272
<RECOVERIES>                                   122
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              2,587
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           2,291
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                            0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        296



</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 921 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 921

  To provide that Executive Order 13768 (82 Fed. Reg. 8799; entitled 
  ``Enhancing Public Safety in the Interior of the United States''), 
shall have no force or effect, to prohibit the use of Federal funds to 
          enforce the Executive Order, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 7, 2017

 Ms. Lofgren introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
   Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committees on 
 Foreign Affairs, and Oversight and Government Reform, for a period to 
      be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for 
consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the 
                          committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To provide that Executive Order 13768 (82 Fed. Reg. 8799; entitled 
  ``Enhancing Public Safety in the Interior of the United States''), 
shall have no force or effect, to prohibit the use of Federal funds to 
          enforce the Executive Order, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Community Trust Act of 2017''.

SEC. 2. EXECUTIVE ORDER TO HAVE NO FORCE OR EFFECT.

    Beginning on January 25, 2017, Executive Order 13768 (82 Fed. Reg. 
8799; entitled ``Enhancing Public Safety in the Interior of the United 
States''), is null and void, shall have no force or effect, and may not 
be implemented, administered, enforced, or carried out.

SEC. 3. NO FUNDS AVAILABLE.

    No Federal funds (including fees) made available for any fiscal 
year, may be used to implement, administer, enforce, or carry out 
(including through the issuance of any regulations) any of the policy 
changes set forth in Executive Order 13768 (82 Fed. Reg. 8799; entitled 
``Enhancing Public Safety in the Interior of the United States'').
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 13.1 Certification of the Principal Executive OfficerPursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 In connection with the annual report of Ambev S.A. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2016, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, or the Report, I, Bernardo Pinto Paiva, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and (2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Date: March 22, 2017. /s/ Bernardo Pinto Paiva Name: Bernardo Pinto Paiva Title:    Chief Executive Officer  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### § 71.125 Control of measuring and test equipment.

The licensee, certificate holder, and applicant for a CoC shall establish measures to assure that tools, gauges, instruments, and other measuring and testing devices used in activities affecting quality are properly controlled, calibrated, and adjusted at specified times to maintain accuracy within necessary limits.
2007-0114.

#### Cleveland Constr., Inc. v. Cincinnati.

Hamilton App. Nos. C-050749, C-050779 and C-050888, 169 Ohio App.3d 627, 2006-Ohio-6452. On motion for leave to add proposition of law to pending appeal and memorandum in support. Motion denied.
###### Editorial Note on Part 63

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 63 appear at 81 FR 86909, Dec. 2, 2016.

#### § 63.203 Implementation of Subpart K.

DOE must demonstrate that normal operations at the Yucca Mountain site will and do occur in compliance with this subpart before the Commission grants or continues a license for DOE to receive and possess radioactive material within the Yucca Mountain site.
**EXHIBIT 31.1**
 
 **CERTIFICATIONS**
 
 
 I, Emil H. Soika, President and Chief Executive Officer of Criticare Systems, Inc., certify that:
 
 1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Criticare Systems, Inc.;
 
 2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
 
 4.  The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 
 (a)  designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 
 (b)  evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
 (c)  disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
 
 5.  The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 
     (a)  all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 
 (b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
 
 Date: November 12, 2004
 /s/ Emil H. Soika
 Emil H. Soika
 President and Chief Executive Officer
 
  2