Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 246 / Thursday, December 23, 2010 / Notices 80859 

1Request of the United States Postal Service to 

Add Priority Mail Contract 32 to Competitive 

Product List and Notice of Filing (Under Seal) of 

Contract and Supporting Data, December 16, 2010 

(Request). 

maintain redacted portions of the 

contract and supporting documents 

under seal. 

In the Statement of Supporting 

Justification, Josen Punnoose, Manager, 

Shipping Support (A), Shipping 

Services, asserts that the service to be 

provided under the contract will cover 

its attributable costs, make a positive 

contribution to institutional costs, and 

increase contribution toward the 

requisite 5.5 percent of the Postal 

Service’s total institutional costs. Id., 

Attachment D. Thus, Mr. Punnoose 

contends there will be no issue of 

subsidization of competitive products 

by market dominant products as a result 

of this contract. Id. 

Related contract. A redacted version 

of the specific Priority Mail Contract 30 

is included with the Request. The 

contract will become effective on the 

day that the Commission provides all 

necessary regulatory approvals. The 

contract states it ‘‘shall expire 3 years 

from the effective date, unless (1) 

terminated by either Party with 30 days 

notice to the other Party in writing 

* * * .’’ The Postal Service represents 

that the contract is consistent with 39 

U.S.C. 3633(a). Id., Attachment D. 

The Postal Service filed much of the 

supporting materials, including the 

specific Priority Mail Contract 30, under 

seal. It maintains that the contract and 

related financial information, including 

the customer’s name and the 

accompanying analyses that provide 

prices, terms, conditions, cost data, and 

financial projections should remain 

under seal. Id., Attachment F. It also 

requests that the Commission order that 

the duration of such treatment of all 

customer-identifying information be 

extended indefinitely, instead of ending 

after 10 years. Id. at 7. 

II. Notice of Filings 

The Commission establishes Docket 

Nos. MC2011–9 and CP2011–44 for 

consideration of the Request pertaining 

to the proposed Priority Mail Contract 

30 product and the related contract, 

respectively. 

Interested persons may submit 

comments on whether the Postal 

Service’s filings in the captioned 

dockets are consistent with the policies 

of 39 U.S.C. 3632, 3633, or 3642 and 39 

CFR part 3015 and 39 CFR 3020, subpart 

B. Comments are due no later than 

December 29, 2010. The public portions 

of these filings can be accessed via the 

Commission’s Web site (http:// 

www.prc.gov). 

The Commission appoints Derrick D. 

Dennis to serve as Public Representative 

in these dockets. 

III. Ordering Paragraphs 

It is ordered: 

1. The Commission establishes Docket 

Nos. MC2011–9 and CP2011–44 for 

consideration of the matters raised in 

each docket. 

2. Pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 505, Derrick 

D. Dennis is appointed to serve as 

officer of the Commission (Public 

Representative) to represent the 

interests of the general public in these 

proceedings. 

3. Comments by interested persons in 

these proceedings are due no later than 

December 29, 2010. 

4. The current contract filed in Docket 

Nos. MC2008–8 and CP2008–26 for 

Priority Mail Contract 1 is authorized to 

continue in effect through January 31, 

2011. 

5. The Secretary shall arrange for 

publication of this order in the Federal 

Register. 

By the Commission. 

Shoshana M. Grove, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2010–32220 Filed 12–22–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7710–FW–P 

POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION 

[Docket Nos. MC2011–11 and CP2011–47; 

Order No. 612] 

New Postal Product 

AGENCY: Postal Regulatory Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Commission is noticing a 

recently-filed Postal Service request to 

add Priority Mail Contract 32 to the 

competitive product list. This notice 

addresses procedural steps associated 

with this filing. 

DATES: Comments are due: December 

29, 2010. 

ADDRESSES: Submit comments 

electronically via the Commission’s 

Filing Online system at http:// 

www.prc.gov. Commenters who cannot 

submit their views electronically should 

contact the person identified in FOR

FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT by 

telephone for advice on alternatives to 

electronic filing. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Stephen L. Sharfman, General Counsel, 

stephen.sharfman@prc.gov or 202–789– 

6820. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Table of Contents 

I. Introduction 

II. Notice of Filing 

III. Ordering Paragraphs 

I. Introduction 

Pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 39 

CFR 3020.30 et seq., the Postal Service 

filed a formal request and associated 

supporting information to add Priority 

Mail Contract 32 to the competitive 

product list.1 The Postal Service asserts 

that Priority Mail Contract 32 is a 

competitive product ‘‘not of general 

applicability’’ within the meaning of 39 

U.S.C. 3632(b)(3). Id. at 1. The Postal 

Service states that the prices and 

classification underlying this contract 

are supported by Governors’ Decision 

No. 09–6 in Docket No. MC2009–25. Id. 

The Request has been assigned Docket 

No. MC2011–11. 

The Postal Service 

contemporaneously filed a contract 

related to the proposed new product 

pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3632(b)(3) and 39 

CFR 3015.5. The instant contract has 

been assigned Docket No. CP2011–47. 

Request. In support of its Request, the 

Postal Service filed six attachments as 

follows: 

• Attachment A—a redacted copy of 

Governors’ Decision No. 09–6, originally 

filed in Docket No. MC2009–25, 

authorizing certain Priority Mail 

contracts; 

• Attachment B—a redacted copy of 

the contract; 

• Attachment C—a proposed change 

in the Mail Classification Schedule 

competitive product list; 

• Attachment D—a Statement of 

Supporting Justification as required by 

39 CFR 3020.32; 

• Attachment E—a certification of 

compliance with 39 U.S.C. 3633(a); and 

• Attachment F—an application for 

non-public treatment of materials to 

maintain redacted portions of the 

contract and supporting documents 

under seal. 

In the Statement of Supporting 

Justification, Josen Punnoose, Manager, 

Shipping Support (A), Shipping 

Services, asserts that the service to be 

provided under the contract will cover 

its attributable costs, make a positive 

contribution to institutional costs, and 

increase contribution toward the 

requisite 5.5 percent of the Postal 

Service’s total institutional costs. Id., 

Attachment D. Thus, Mr. Punnoose 

contends there will be no issue of 

subsidization of competitive products 

by market dominant products as a result 

of this contract. Id. 

Related contract. A redacted version 

of the specific Priority Mail Contract 32 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES

80860 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 246 / Thursday, December 23, 2010 / Notices 

1Request of the United States Postal Service to 

Add Express Mail Contract 10 to Competitive 

Product List and Notice of Filing (Under Seal) of 

Supporting Data, December 16, 2010 (Request). 

is included with the Request. The 

contract will become effective on the 

day that the Commission provides all 

necessary regulatory approvals. The 

contract states it ‘‘shall expire 3 years 

from the effective date, unless (1) 

terminated by either Party with 30 days 

notice to the other Party in writing 

* * *.’’ The Postal Service represents 

that the contract is consistent with 39 

U.S.C. 3633(a). See id., Attachment D. 

The Postal Service filed much of the 

supporting materials, including the 

specific Priority Mail Contract 32, under 

seal. It maintains that the contract and 

related financial information, including 

the customer’s name and the 

accompanying analyses that provide 

prices, terms, conditions, cost data, and 

financial projections should remain 

under seal. See id., Attachment F. It also 

requests that the Commission order that 

the duration of such treatment of all 

customer-identifying information be 

extended indefinitely, instead of ending 

after 10 years. Id. at 7. 

II. Notice of Filings 

The Commission establishes Docket 

Nos. MC2011–11 and CP2011–47 for 

consideration of the Request pertaining 

to the proposed Priority Mail Contract 

32 product and the related contract, 

respectively. 

Interested persons may submit 

comments on whether the Postal 

Service’s filings in the captioned 

dockets are consistent with the policies 

of 39 U.S.C. 3632, 3633, or 3642 and 39 

CFR part 3015 and 39 CFR part 3020, 

subpart B. Comments are due no later 

than December 29, 2010. The public 

portions of these filings can be accessed 

via the Commission’s Web site (http:// 

www.prc.gov). 

The Commission appoints Derrick D. 

Dennis to serve as Public Representative 

in these dockets. 

III. Ordering Paragraphs 

It is ordered: 

1. The Commission establishes Docket 

Nos. MC2011–11 and CP2011–47 for 

consideration of the matters raised in 

each docket. 

2. Pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 505, Derrick 

D. Dennis is appointed to serve as 

officer of the Commission (Public 

Representative) to represent the 

interests of the general public in these 

proceedings. 

3. Comments by interested persons in 

these proceedings are due no later than 

December 29, 2010. 

4. The Secretary shall arrange for 

publication of this order in the Federal 

Register. 

By the Commission. 

Shoshana M. Grove, 

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2010–32218 Filed 12–22–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7710–FW–P 

POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION 

[Docket Nos. MC2011–12 and CP2011–48; 

Order No. 613] 

New Postal Product 

AGENCY: Postal Regulatory Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Commission is noticing a 

recently-filed Postal Service request to 

add Express Mail Contract 10 to the 

competitive product list. This notice 

addresses procedural steps associated 

with this filing. 

DATES: Comments are due: December 

29, 2010. 

ADDRESSES: Submit comments 

electronically via the Commission’s 

Filing Online system at http:// 

www.prc.gov. Commenters who cannot 

submit their views electronically should 

contact the person identified in FOR

FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT by 

telephone for advice on alternatives to 

electronic filing. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Stephen L. Sharfman, General Counsel, 

stephen.sharfman@prc.gov or 202–789– 

6820. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Table of Contents 

I. Introduction 

II. Notice of Filing 

III. Ordering Paragraphs 

I. Introduction 

Pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 39 

CFR 3020.30 et seq., the Postal Service 

filed a formal request and associated 

supporting information to add Express 

Mail Contract 10 to the competitive 

product list.1 The Postal Service asserts 

that Express Mail Contract 10 is a 

competitive product ‘‘not of general 

applicability’’ within the meaning of 39 

U.S.C. 3632(b)(3). Id. at 1. The Postal 

Service states that the prices and 

classification underlying this contract 

are supported by Governors’ Decision 

No. 09–14 in Docket No. MC2010–5 and 

CP2010–5. Id. The Request has been 

assigned Docket No. MC2011–12. 

The Postal Service 

contemporaneously filed a contract 

related to the proposed new product 

pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3632(b)(3) and 39 

CFR 3015.5. The contract has been 

assigned Docket No. CP2011–48. 

Request. In support of its Request, the 

Postal Service filed six attachments as 

follows: 

• Attachment A—a redacted copy of 

Governors’ Decision No. 09–14, 

originally filed in Docket No. MC2010– 

5, authorizing certain Express Mail 

contracts; 

• Attachment B—a redacted copy of 

the contract; 

• Attachment C—a proposed change 

in the Mail Classification Schedule 

competitive product list; 

• Attachment D—a Statement of 

Supporting Justification as required by 

39 CFR 3020.32; 

• Attachment E—a certification of 

compliance with 39 U.S.C. 3633(a); and 

• Attachment F—an application for 

non-public treatment of materials to 

maintain redacted portions of the 

contract and supporting documents 

under seal. 

In the Statement of Supporting 

Justification, Josen Punnoose, Manager, 

Shipping Support (A), Shipping 

Services, asserts that the service to be 

provided under the contract will cover 

its attributable costs, make a positive 

contribution to institutional costs, and 

increase contribution toward the 

requisite 5.5 percent of the Postal 

Service’s total institutional costs. Id., 

Attachment D. Thus, Mr. Punnoose 

contends there will be no issue of 

subsidization of competitive products 

by market dominant products as a result 

of this contract. Id. 

Related contract. A redacted version 

of the specific Express Mail Contract 10 

is included with the Request. The 

contract will become effective the day 

that the Commission provides all 

necessary regulatory approvals. The 

contract states it ‘‘shall expire 3 years 

from the effective date, unless (1) 

terminated by either Party with 30 days 

notice to the other Party in writing 

* * *.’’ The Postal Service represents 

that the contract is consistent with 39 

U.S.C. 3633 (a). See id., Attachment D. 

The Postal Service maintains that the 

contract and related financial 

information, including the customer’s 

name and the accompanying analyses 

that provide prices, terms, conditions, 

cost data, and financial projections, 

should remain under seal. See id., 

Attachment F. It also requests that the 

Commission order that the duration of 

such treatment of all customeridentifying information be extended 

indefinitely, instead of ending after 10 

years. Id. at 7. 

mstockstill on DSKH9S0YB1PROD with NOTICES