alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
PGI 253.208-2 DD Form 448-2, Acceptance of

MIPR.

(a) Use the DD Form 448-2 as prescribed in PGI 208.70 .

(b) Instructions for completion of DD Form 448-2. (Complete only the applicable blocks.)

(1) BLOCK 6. Check the specific terms under which the MIPR is being accepted.

(2) BLOCK 7. If any one of the MIPR line items is not accepted, check Block 7 and record the

affected MIPR line item number and reason in Block 13.

(3) BLOCKS 8 AND 9. Use Blocks 8 and 9 only—

(i) When Block 6c acceptance is indicated (indicate the MIPR line item numbers that will be provided

under each method of financing in Blocks 8a and 9a, respectively); or

(ii) If quantities or estimated costs cited in a MIPR require adjustment (list the affected MIPR line

item numbers together with the adjusted quantities or estimated costs in the columns provided

under Blocks 8 and 9, as appropriate).

(4) BLOCK 10. Whenever a MIPR is accepted in part or in total under Category II funding, forecast

the estimated date of contract award.

(5) BLOCK 11. Enter the total amount of funds required to fund the MIPR items, as accepted.

(6) BLOCK 12.

(i) Complete this block only in those cases where the amount recorded in Block 11 is not in

agreement with the amount recorded in Block 5. This will serve either—

(A) As a request to the requiring department to issue a MIPR amendment to provide the additional

funds; or

(B) Authority for the requiring department to withdraw the available excess funds.

(ii) When funds of two or more appropriations are involved, provide proper breakdown information

in Block 13.

(7) BLOCK 13. Use this block to record—

(i) Justification, by MIPR line item, for any additional funds required;

(ii) Explanation for rejection of MIPR whether in part or in total;

(iii) Appropriation and subhead data cited on the MIPR; and

(iv) Other pertinent data.

(c) Complete a DD Form 448-2 for all MIPR amendments involving an adjustment of funds or

delivery schedule, or if requested by the requiring department.
(d) Unless otherwise agreed, provide the requiring department an original and three copies of each

DD Form 448-2.

Parent topic: PGI 253.208 Required sources of supplies and services.
§ 431.427 Disposition of petitions. ( a ) After the submission of public comments under § 431.213(a), the Secretary shall prescribe a final rule or deny the petition within 6 months after the date the petition is filed.
( b ) The final rule issued by the Secretary or a determination by the Secretary to deny the petition shall include a written statement setting forth his findings and conclusions, and the reasons and basis therefor. A copy of the Secretary's decision shall be sent to the petitioner and the affected State agency. The Secretary shall publish in the Federal Register a notice of the final rule granting or denying the petition and the reasons and basis therefor.
( c ) If the Secretary finds that he cannot issue a final rule within the 6-month period pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section, he shall publish a notice in the Federal Register extending such period to a date certain, but no longer than one year after the date on which the petition was filed. Such notice shall include the reasons for the delay.
Description of Transition Award



 Exhibit 10.20 
 Description of Transition Award to Ronald E. Logue 
 On November 18, 2009, in connection with the Board of Directors’ approval of the management succession plan in October 2009, pursuant to which Joseph L. Hooley will become State Street’s Chief Executive Officer effective
March 1, 2010, the Executive Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors approved a transition award to Ronald E. Logue, State Street’s Chief Executive Officer, of $6 million, payable in deferred cash. The transition award will
vest and be paid to Mr. Logue on January 2, 2011, subject to Mr. Logue completing his service as Chief Executive Officer and as Non-Executive Chairman of the Board of Directors. This transition award recognizes
Mr. Logue’s ongoing contributions in leading State Street, the importance of his continuing to perform the role of Chief Executive Officer through March 1, 2010 and his agreeing to remain as Non-Executive Chairman of the Board of
Directors through January 1, 2011.
#### McCADDON v. CENTRAL TRUST CO.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

February 26, 1915.)

Action by Joseph T. McCaddon against the Central Trust Company.

No opinion. Motion denied, with $10 costs. Order filed. See, also, 151 N. Y. Supp. 646.
#### § 71.12 Specific exemptions.

On application of any interested person or on its own initiative, the Commission may grant any exemption from the requirements of the regulations in this part that it determines is authorized by law and will not endanger life or property nor the common defense and security.
2007-1030.

#### Valente v. Johnson.

Athens App. Nos. 06CA31 and 06CA38, 2007-Ohio-2664. Reported at 115 Ohio St.3d 1440, 2007-Ohio-5567, 875 N.E.2d 101. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 643 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 643

       Directing the Attorney General to submit to the House of 
Representatives all documents in the possession of the Attorney General 
     relating to warrantless electronic surveillance of telephone 
 conversations and electronic communications of persons in the United 
           States conducted by the National Security Agency.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 22, 2005

  Mr. Conyers (for himself, Mr. Berman, Mr. Boucher, Mr. Nadler, Mr. 
 Scott of Virginia, Ms. Zoe Lofgren of California, Ms. Jackson-Lee of 
 Texas, Ms. Waters, Mr. Meehan, Mr. Delahunt, Mr. Wexler, Mr. Weiner, 
  Mr. Schiff, Ms. Linda T. Sanchez of California, Mr. Van Hollen, Ms. 
   Wasserman Schultz, Mr. Kennedy of Rhode Island, Mr. Doggett, Mr. 
   McDermott, Mr. Filner, Mr. Markey, Ms. Schakowsky, Ms. Lee, Mrs. 
 Tauscher, Ms. McCollum of Minnesota, Mr. Udall of New Mexico, and Mr. 
  Holt) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
       Directing the Attorney General to submit to the House of 
Representatives all documents in the possession of the Attorney General 
     relating to warrantless electronic surveillance of telephone 
 conversations and electronic communications of persons in the United 
           States conducted by the National Security Agency.

    Resolved, That the Attorney General is directed to submit to the 
House of Representatives not later than 14 days after the date of the 
adoption of this resolution all documents in the possession of the 
Attorney General relating to warrantless electronic surveillance of 
telephone conversations and electronic communications of persons in the 
United States conducted by the National Security Agency (other than 
such warrantless electronic surveillance authorized to be conducted 
under section 102(a) of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 
1978), subject to necessary redactions or requirements for handling 
classified documents, including any and all opinions regarding 
warrantless electronic surveillance of telephone conversations and 
electronic communications of persons in the United States.
                                 <all>
```
Answers

PESTS OR GUESTS, p. 1 

1. P, grub 5. G, spider 

2. P, worm 6. P, mosquito 

3. G, bee 7. P, ants 

4. P, cockroach 8. P, wasp 

INSECT PESTS AND PALS, p. 2 

THE 3 P’S IN ACTION, p. 3 

1. parasite 

2. pathogen 

3. predators 

GREEN, GREEN GRASS, p. 6 

1. Grass needs nothing. 

2. fertilizer 

3. nothing 

4. fertilizer 

PURPLE PLAGUE, p. 8 

Florida, Hawaii 

BEWARE, p. 9 

Milfoil 

OUTSMART THOSE PESTS, p. 10 

1. birdhouses, sunflowers 

2. toads, slugs 

3. garbage 

4. crumbs 

5. screens 

6. tomatoes 

MAZE, p. 11 

Pests can get into any opened or spilled 

containers. 

COCKROACH MENU, p. 12 

V R N U J Y Q S P C G D J H H J R Z T 

MOSQUITO-EATING 

MACHINES, p. 15 

3,000 and 7,000 mosquitoes 

Q 

F I N G E R N A I L C L I P P I N G S 

P M B T S J H W G U G D U Y D R R I Y 

Z G E V K B S T D I K I G Z O G V B O 

C Z S G V O O P I Q V P Z I C R G A W 

Q W X L V S D O E C L E H R W E E M W 

H T H U B E D E K A B V Y W I A C I G 

Y A G E I Q Z Y J B N H O M P S R K L 

U X U O W I Q V L I I U L D L E S M C 

S R E N A C S O A P M N T I F I K U C 

C X N D F Y T C K X Z D B L M P N R 

U L L P S C W K H X Q U H I U G C H U 

O S P O L X O B C Y U O C Y N T X Q M 

U W P E U V F E G F N N W E C G T K B 

Z H U A P E T F O O D P F M L F S E S 

P Q D O R M M Y D B A Z X F R H P Y R 

WHAT'S ALL THE BUZZZ?, p. 17 

A. wasp 

B. honeybee 

GYPSY MOTH, p. 18 

1. oak A. 2 

2. aspen B. 4 

3. poplar C. 1 

4. apple D. 3 

5. crabapple 

6. birch 

7. maple 

8. willow 

9. basswood 

10. box elder 

CRAZY ABOUT COMPOST, p. 20 

Good soil. 

COMPOST INGREDIENTS, p. 21 

A. coffee grounds 

B. grass clippings 

C. food scraps 

D. decaying leaves 

E. veggie peels 

F. eggshells 

G. fruit cores 

ARE YOU QUALIFIED FOR 

PEST PATROL?, p. 24 

1. C 

2. E 

3. A 

4. D 

5. B
Editorial Note on Part 712
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 712 appear at 88 FR 41292, June 26, 2023.

§ 712.18 Transferring HRP certification. ( a ) For HRP certification to be transferred, the individual must currently be certified in the HRP.
( b ) Transferring the HRP certification from one site to another requires the following before the individual is allowed to perform HRP duties at the new site: ( 1 ) Verify that the individual is currently certified in the HRP and is transferring into a designated HRP position;
( 2 ) Incorporate the individual into the new site's alcohol and drug-testing program;
( 3 ) Ensure that the 12-month time period for HRP requirements that was established at the prior site is not exceeded; and
( 4 ) Provide site-specific instruction.
( c ) Temporary assignment to HRP positions at other sites requires verification that the individual is currently enrolled in the HRP and has completed all site-specific instruction. The individual is required to return to the site that maintains his or her HRP certification for recertification.
#### Martin P. Brady, an Infant, by his Guardian ad Litem, Joseph F. Brady, et al., Respondents, v. City of Buffalo, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously reversed on the law without costs and complaint dismissed. Memorandum: The city constructed a slide in a public playground for use in winter months by persons with sleds and toboggans. The infant plaintiff when six years old was injured when struck by another sled. He described the accident as follows: *“*I was waiting in line for my turn to go up the slide. There was a lot of people in front of me. I was about near the end and some kid start[ed] running, did a belly flop on the sled and he rammed me with it.” It was stipu- ■ lated that the city furnished no personnel to supervise those using the facility. The legal principle is recognized that “ When a public body undertakes to maintain an area for recreation, an adequate degree of general supervision must be exercised to assure that the area is reasonably fit for that purpose ” but “ failure to furnish adequate supervision over the activities in a playground will result in liability only if the violation of the duty had a causal relation to the accident.” (42 N. Y. Jur., Parks and Recreation Centers, § 74.) Here, “ There was no credible evidence of conduct at the slide, which reasonable supervision would have corrected. In other words, there was no showing that lack of supervision was the proximate cause of the accident ” *(Diaz*v. *City of New York,*25 A D 2d 430, 431, affd. 23 N Y 2d 748). The trial court should have granted defendant’s motion for a nonsuit and dismissal of the complaint *(Blum*v. *Fresh Grown Preserve Corp.,*292 N. Y. 241, 245). (Appeal from judgment of Erie Trial Term in negligence action.) Present— Goldman, P. J., Del Vecchio, Witmer, Gabrielli and Bastow, JJ.
PGI 237.102-73 Prohibition on contracts for

services of senior mentors.

DoD policies on senior mentors are set forth in (1) Secretary of Defense memorandum, subject:

Policy on Senior Mentors (April 1, 2010) (see here) and (2) Deputy Secretary of Defense

memorandum, subject: Implementation Guidance on Senior Mentors Policy (July 8, 2010) (see here).

Parent topic: PGI 237.102 Policy.
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 09**  **- 1136** 

DERICK J

. NOEL; HILARY A. FINDLEY , Plaintiffs

- Appellants ,

v. J.R. ATKINSON, trading as Atkinson Truck Sales , Defendant

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Greenbelt

. Peter J. Messitte, Senior District Judge. ( 8:08

- cv - 01978

- PJM )

Submitted : August 20, 2010 Decided: August 26, 2010

Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
John F. Pressley, Jr., Washington, D.C., for Appellant s . Phillip R. Zuber, SASSCER, CLAGETT & BUCHER, Upper Marlboro, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURI AM:
Derick J. Noel and Hilary A. Findley appeal the district court’s orders granting summary judgment in favor of

J. R. Atkinson (t/a Atkinson Truck Sales) on a complaint based on the repossession of a motor vehicle. We have reviewed the
record and the parties’ briefs and conclude that the district court properly determined that the repossession at issue was permissible according to the terms of the contract and state law. Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and leg al contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
§ 780.24 Criteria for declaring a patent affected with the public interest. A patent shall be declared to be affected with the public interest pursuant to section 153a of the Act upon the Board's final decision that: ( a ) The invention or discovery covered by the patent is of primary importance in the production or utilization of special nuclear material or atomic energy; and
( b ) The licensing of such invention or discovery under section 153 of the Act is of primary importance to effectuate the policies and purposes of the Act.
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Frederick V. Miles, Sr., Appellant. Martin P. Catherwood, as Industrial Commissioner, Respondent.

Staley, Jr., J.

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed August 15, 1968, which held claimant ineligible for unemployment insurance benefits on the ground that he was not totally unemployed, holding that he willfully misrepresented his employment status to receive benefits for which a forfeiture of 24 effective days was imposed, and charging him with an overpayment of $602 in benefits which was ruled to be recoverable. Claimant was employed in October, 1966 as a caretaker and building maintenance man for property consisting of about 16 acres upon which there was a main house, a cottage, and a tool shop. In addition to his salary of $85 per week, claimant resided in the cottage at no rent, paying only for heat and light. In the month of November, 1967 his employer stopped paying his salary, but told him that he could continue to reside in the cottage providing he would plow the snow and do minor emergency repairs on the buildings. Claimant applied for benefits in November, 1967 at which time he stated that he was unemployed and was available for immediate employment. At an interview on December 15, 1967 claimant stated that he was laid off for the winter and intended to return to his regular job in the spring; that he was ready to begin work immediately; that he was living on the grounds of his usual employer, but he was not performing any services now and was free to work elsewhere. At an interview on March 18, 1968 claimant stated: “ In return for living on the premises I was to care for the grounds and buildings, such as snow and any emergencies on the building. I was required to be on the grounds at all times. If I took other work I would then have taken the risk of losing this job. I do not know when I will start receiving a salary. I am ready now to take other work.”. On this record we cannot find, as a matter of law, that the board erred in, its conclusion. On the evidence the board could properly find that claimant was not totally unemployed, and that the reasonable value of the rent for the cottage was compensation for his services. The board could also properly determine that claimant, in stating that he was unemployed and was free to *856work elsewhere, willfully misrepresented his employment status to receive benefits. Hence, any benefits received as a result could properly be required to be repaid. *(Matter of Horner*[OatherwooA], 32 A D 2d 700; *Matter of Bailey*[Catherwood], 18 A D 2d 727.) Decision affirmed, without costs. Herlihy, P. J., Aulisi, Staley, Jr., Cooke and Sweeney, JJ., concur in memorandum by Staley, Jr., J.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

MAEGUERITA QUIRE,

Appellant,

v.

LEN SWALLOW, ET AL.,

Appellee.

No. 4D18-2849

[October 10, 2019]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Martin J. Bidwill, Judge; L.T. Case No. CACE 16008159.

Maeguerita Quire, Miramar, pro se.

Mattew T. Ramenda of Weiss Serota Helfman Cole & Bierman, P.L., 

Boca Raton, for appellees Ray Black and Christopher Smith.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

TAYLOR, MAY and FORST, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
H. Res. 694 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

January 18, 2018. 

Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall 

be in order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 4712) to 

amend title 18, United States Code, to prohibit a health care 

practitioner from failing to exercise the proper degree of care 

in the case of a child who survives an abortion or attempted 

abortion. All points of order against consideration of the bill 

are waived. The bill shall be considered as read. All points 

of order against provisions in the bill are waived. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and 

on any amendment thereto to final passage without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate equally divided 

and controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of 

the Committee on the Judiciary; and (2) one motion to recommit. 

SEC. 2. On any legislative day during the period from 

January 22, 2018, through January 26, 2018— 

(a) the Journal of the proceedings of the previous day 

shall be considered as approved; and 
2 

•HRES 694 EH 

(b) the Chair may at any time declare the House adjourned to meet at a date and time, within the limits of 

clause 4, section 5, article I of the Constitution, to be announced by the Chair in declaring the adjournment. 

SEC. 3. The Speaker may appoint Members to perform 

the duties of the Chair for the duration of the period addressed by section 2 of this resolution as though under clause 

8(a) of rule I. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 790 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 790

  Providing for the consideration of the bill (H.R. 2193), a bill to 
  grant States authority to enforce State and local sales and use tax 
          laws on remote transactions, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 19, 2018

Mrs. Noem submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                           Committee on Rules

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for the consideration of the bill (H.R. 2193), a bill to 
  grant States authority to enforce State and local sales and use tax 
          laws on remote transactions, and for other purposes.

    Resolved, That immediately upon adoption of this resolution, the 
House shall proceed to the consideration in the House of the bill (H.R. 
2193) to grant States authority to enforce State and local sales and 
use tax laws on remote transactions, and for other purposes. All points 
of order against consideration of the bill are waived. The bill shall 
be considered as read. The previous question shall be considered as 
ordered on the bill and on any further amendment thereto to final 
passage without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate 
equally divided and controlled by the Majority Leader and the Minority 
Leader or their respective designees; and (2) one motion to recommit 
with or without instructions.
    Sec. 2.  Clause 1(c) of rule XIX shall not apply to the 
consideration of H.R. 2193.
                                 <all>
```
§ 503.11 Alternative sites—general requirement for permanent exemptions for new powerplants. ( a ) *Criteria.* To qualify for permanent exemption due to lack of alternate fuel supply, site limitations, environmental requirements, or inadequate capital, section 212(a) of the Act requires a demonstration that one of these exemptions would be available for any reasonable alternative site for the facility.
( b ) *Evidence.* The petition must include the following evidence in order to make the demonstration required by this section: ( 1 ) Duly executed certifications to the criteria set forth in paragraph (a) of this section; and
( 2 ) Exhibits containing the basis for the certifications submitted under this section (including those factual and analytical materials deemed by the petitioner to be sufficient to support its certifications to this general requirement).
[46 FR 59903, Dec. 7, 1981, as amended at 54 FR 52894, Dec. 22, 1989]
Editorial Note on Part 55
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 55 appear at 80 FR 74980, Dec. 1, 2015.

§ 55.43 Written examination: Senior operators. ( a ) *Content.* The written examination for a senior operator will contain a representative selection of questions on the knowledge, skills, and abilities needed to perform licensed senior operator duties. The knowledge, skills, and abilities will be identified, in part, from learning objectives derived from a systematic analysis of licensed senior operator duties performed by each facility licensee and contained in its training program and from information in the Final Safety Analysis Report, system description manuals and operating procedures, facility license and license amendments, Licensee Event Reports, and other materials requested from the facility licensee by the Commission.
( b ) The written examination for a senior operator for a facility will include a representative sample from among the following seven items and the 14 items specified in § 55.41 of this part, to the extent applicable to the facility: ( 1 ) Conditions and limitations in the facility license.
( 2 ) Facility operating limitations in the technical specifications and their bases.
( 3 ) Facility licensee procedures required to obtain authority for design and operating changes in the facility.
( 4 ) Radiation hazards that may arise during normal and abnormal situations, including maintenance activities and various contamination conditions.
( 5 ) Assessment of facility conditions and selection of appropriate procedures during normal, abnormal, and emergency situations.
( 6 ) Procedures and limitations involved in initial core loading, alterations in core configuration, control rod programming, and determination of various internal and external effects on core reactivity.
( 7 ) Fuel handling facilities and procedures.