alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# SUBPART 50.1 – EXTRAORDINARY CONTRACTUAL ACTIONS

*(Revised August 30, 2022 through PROCLTR 22-12)*

**Parent topic:**PART 50 – EXTRAORDINARY CONTRACTUAL ACTIONS AND THE SAFETY ACT

## 50.101 General.

### 50.101-3 Records.

(a) Records shall be maintained by the contracting officer in Records Management. 

(b) Per DLAD 4.802, DLR sites shall follow the processes and systems at the Military Services sites. 

## 50.103 Contract adjustments.

### 50.103-5 Processing cases.

(S-90) The procuring organization responsible for processing a contractor's request is responsible for processing cases in accordance with DFARS PGI 250.103-5 and, following legal review by Office of Counsel, will send the case with recommendation for disposition through the HCA to the DLA Acquisition Operations Division for processing to the Agency Director for decision. The procuring organization is also responsible for establishing liaison and joint action with other Military Departments and other departments and agencies of the Government, as appropriate.

### 50.103-6 Disposition.

In accordance with DFARS 250.103-6, the DLA Acquisition Operations Division will maintain records of disposition in accordance with DFARS PGI 250.103-6.
#### In the Matter of Bernard Cooper, Appellant, v Donald Selsky, as Director of Special Housing and Inmate Disciplinary Programs, Respondent.

Submitted January 7, 2008;

decided January 15, 2008

Reported below, 43 AD3d 1254.

Appeal dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, upon the ground that no substantial constitutional question is directly involved.
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT KARLA YANIR

A M OREIR

A-DE SANAB R IA, Pe titione r, v. LORETTA E. LYNC H, Attorne y Ge ne ra l, R

e sponde n t . No. 12-70927 Age n c y No. A088-017-750 M EM O R ANDUM *

On Pe tition for Re vie w of a n Orde r of the B oa rd of Im m igration Appe a ls Subm itte d

M ay 13, 2015 ** B e fore : LEAVY, C ALLAHAN, a nd M . SM ITH, C i rc uit Judge s. Karla Ya nira M ore ira -De Sana

bria , a native and c itiz e n

of El Sa lva dor, pe titions pro se

for re vie w of the B o ard of Im m igration Appe a ls’ (“ B IA” ) orde r dism issing he r a

p p e a l from

an im m igration judge ’ s de c ision de ny ing he r a pplic ation for a s y lum , withholding of rem ova l, a nd prote c tion unde r the 

# FIL ED M AY21 2015 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).C onve ntion Aga inst Torture(“ C AT” ). Our jurisdic tion is governe d by 8 U.S.C . § 1252. W e re vie wfor substa ntia l e vide nc e the a ge nc y ’ s fa c tua l findings. Ze haty e v . Gonzale

s , 453 F.3d 1182, 1184-85 (9th C ir. 2006). W e de ny the pe tition for re vie w. The B IA found M ore ira -De San a b ria fa ile d to e sta

blish pa st pe rse c ution or a we ll-founde d fe ar of future pe rse c ution on a c c ount of he r soc ia l group of sm a ll m e rc ha n ts in El Sa lva dor. Substa ntia l e vide nc e supports the B IA’ s de nia l of a sy lum on this ba sis. Se e Ze tino v . Holde r , 622 F.3d 1007, 1015-16 (9th C ir. 2010); s e e also Parussimov a v . Muk a se y , 555 F.3d 734, 740 (9th C ir. 2009) (“ [t] he R e a l ID Ac t re q

uire s tha t a prote c te d ground repre s e nt ‘ o ne c e ntra l re a son’ for an a sy lum a pplic ant's pe rse c ution” ). W e la c k jurisdic tion to c onside r the c o nte ntion re ga rding othe r soc i a l group c la im s M ore i ra -De Sana bria did not ra ise to the B IA. Se e Barron v . Ashc roft , 358 F.3d 674, 677-78 (9th C ir. 2004). Thus, we de ny the pe tition a s to a sy lum . B e c a use M ore i ra -De Sana

bria fa ile d to e sta b lish e ligibility

for a sy lum , he r withholding of rem o v a l c la im ne c e ssa rily fa ils. Se e Ze h aty e , 453 F.3d a t 1190. Fina lly , substa

ntia l e v ide nc e supports the a ge nc y ’ s de nia l of C AT re lie f be c a use M ore ira -De Sana

bria fa ile d to show it is m

ore like ly tha n not she will be torture d with thec onse nt or a c quie sc e nc e of the Sa lva dora n gove rnm e n t if re turne d 1 2 - 7 0 9 2 7 2to El Sa l va dor. Se e Garc i a-Milian v . Holde r, 755 F.3d 1026, 1033-35 (9th C ir.

2014). PE T IT IO N FO R RE V IE WDE NIE D.

1 2 - 7 0 9 2 7 3
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Quarterly Report of Archon Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, Paul W. Lowden, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, and Grant L. Siler, Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003, that to our knowledge:



| | (i) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: February 18, 2011



|                                    
|------------------------------------
|/s/    Paul W. Lowden               
|Paul W. Lowden                      
|Chairman of the Board, President and
|Principal Executive Officer         
|                                    
|/s/    Grant L. Siler               
|Grant L. Siler                      
|Principal Accounting Officer        

This certification accompanies the above-described Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by

such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
BEFORE THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION WASHINGTON, D. C.

Motion of AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC. DOT-OST-1996-1203 for confidential treatment under Rule 12 (Form 41, Schedule B-7)

MOTION OF AMERICANAIRLINES, INC. FOR

CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT UNDER RULE 12
Communications with respect to this document shouldbe sent to: VIRASB VAHIDI SeniorVice President

- Marketing and Planning and Chief Commercial Officer AmericanAirlines, Inc. P.O. Box 619616, MD 5628 DFW Airport, Texas 75261

November 8, 2012 WILLIAM K. RIS, JR. SeniorVice President

- Government Affairs AmericanAirlines, Inc. 1101 17th Street, N.W. Suite 600 Washington, D.C. 20036 FRANCIS C. HEIL SeniorAttorney AmericanAirlines, Inc. 1101 17th Street, N.W. Suite 600 Washington, D.C. 20036 (202) 496-5642 francis.heil@aa.com 

### JSMotion of BEFORE THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION WASHINGTON, D. C.

AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC. for confidential treatment under Rule 12 (Form 41, Schedule B-7) ·DOT-OST-1996-1203

MOTION OFAMERICANAIRLINES, INC. FOR

CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT UNDERRULE 12
AmericanAirlines, Inc., under 14 CFR 302.12, hereby
moves that its Form41, Schedule B-7 for 3Q2012 be accorded confidential treatment andwithheld frompublic disclosure. The information for which confidential treatment is requested pertains toAmerican's airframe and aircraft engine acquisitions and retirements. In accordance with the Department's Final Rule on Submitting Airline Data via the Internet, 75 Fed. Reg. 41580, 41582, July 16, 2010, we are uploading our confidential report electronicallyto http://esubmit.rita.dot.gov On June 5, 1995, by letter of James W. Mitchell, Director, Office ofAirline Statistics, the Department granted confidential treatment for a 10-yearperiodto similar data filed byAmerican. For the reasons statedin that letter, the current submission should also receive confidential treatment for 10 years.2

-
WHEREFORE, Americanmoves that the schedule being submitted electronicallyto the above-referenced website be withheld frompublic disclosure under Rule 12 for a period of 10 years.

November 8, 2012 Respectfully submitted,

Francis C. Heil Senior Attorney American Airlines, Inc.
**Arizona**

**Arizona 13 Navajo**
PGI 215.371-2 Promote competition.

(a) For competitive solicitations in which more than one potential offeror expressed an interest in an

acquisition, but only one offer was ultimately received, the Contracting Officer shall—

(1) Seek feedback (e.g., issue an RFI) after award from potential offerors expected to submit an

offer; and

(2) Document any feedback received in the contract file.

(b) Agencies shall use any feedback received when considering how to overcome barriers to

competition for future requirements.

Parent topic: PGI 215.371 Only one offer.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

CALVIN FLUKER, RICARDO )

WRIGHT, BERYL JACKSON, )

TRACEY MARTIN, LISA )

PITCHFORD, KIMBERLY LOVE, )

)

Plaintiffs, )

)

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO.:

) 2:06cv785-MHT

U.S. FOODSERVICE, INC. and )

U.S. FOODSERVICE, INC. - )

MONTGOMERY DIVISION, )

)

Defendants. )

UNOPPOSED MOTION TO EXTEND DEADLINES

Defendant U.S. Foodservice, Inc. moves this Court to extend all pending

deadlines. In support of this motion, defendant states as follows:

1. Counsel for defendant recently left their law firm and have opened the

new office of a national law firm. There has been some delay in having the physical

and electronic files transferred from defense counsel’s former firm.

2. If granted, the following deadlines would apply:

Discovery –January 18, 2008

Expert Report from Plaintiff – August 22, 2007

Expert Report from Defendant – September 26, 2007

Case 2:06-cv-00785-MHT-WC Document 33 Filed 06/08/2007 Page 1 of 3
2

Dispositive Motions –January 15, 2008

Settlement Conference – February 5, 2008

Pre-Trial Conference – March 19, 2008

Trial – Court Term Commencing June 23, 2008

3. This motion is not opposed by counsel for plaintiff.

Respectfully submitted,

s/ Tammy L. Baker

Tammy L. Baker (ASB-9522-B62T)

E-Mail: BakerT@jacksonlewis.com

JACKSON LEWIS LLP

2001Park Place North

Suite 650

Birmingham, Alabama 35203

Phone: (866) 919-6075

COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT

Case 2:06-cv-00785-MHT-WC Document 33 Filed 06/08/2007 Page 2 of 3
3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

This is to certify that on June 8, 2007, the undersigned electronically filed the

foregoing with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system that will send

notification of such filing to the following:

Jon C. Goldfarb, Esq.

Maury S. Weiner, Esq.

Ethan R. Dettling, Esq.

Wiggins, Childs, Quinn & Pantazis, LLC

301 19

th

Street North

Birmingham, AL 35203

/s/ Tammy L. Baker

Counsel of Record

Case 2:06-cv-00785-MHT-WC Document 33 Filed 06/08/2007 Page 3 of 3
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

Certification of Principal Financial Officer

 

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, theundersigned officer of Owens-Illinois, Inc. (the “Company”) herebycertifies that to such officer’s knowledge:

 

(i)            theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended March 31,2009 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) orSection 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended; and

 

(ii)           theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated:  May 6, 2009 | /s/  Edward C. White                               |
|--------------------------|----------------------------------------------------|
|                     | Edward C. White                                    |
|                     | Senior  Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|                     | Owens-Illinois, Inc.                          |

 

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished tothe Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

1

----
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Gregory Smith, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered August 8,1978, convicting him of grand larceny in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Judgment reversed, on the law, and new trial ordered. No issue has been presented with respect to the facts. As the People concede, the trial court committed reversible error when it failed to charge, as requested, that no inference unfavorable to defendant could be drawn from his decision not to take the stand. (See CPL 300.10, subd 2; *People v Britt,*43 NY2d 111.) Lazer, J. P., Cohalan, Martuscello and Weinstein, JJ., concur.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-7294

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus CLARENCE EDWARD HAYNES, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CR-90-30-A, CA-01-1024-A) Submitted: November 29, 2001 Decided: December 10, 2001 Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Clarence Edward Haynes, Appellant Pro Se. Bernard James Apperson, III, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Clarence Edward Haynes appeals the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Haynes , Nos. CR-90-30-A; CA01-1024-A (E.D. Va. July 3, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented inthe materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
`[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 632 Reported in House (RH)]







                                                 House Calendar No. 139
109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 632

                          [Report No. 109-358]

   Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to 
  consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on 
                                 Rules.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 17, 2005

    Mr. Putnam, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION


 
   Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to 
  consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on 
                                 Rules.

    Resolved, That the requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII for a 
two-thirds vote to consider a report from the Committee on Rules on the 
same day it is presented to the House is waived with respect to any 
resolution reported on the legislative day of Sunday, December 18, 
2005.
                                                 House Calendar No. 139

109th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                              H. RES. 632

                          [Report No. 109-358]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

   Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to 
  consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on 
                                 Rules.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           December 17, 2005

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed`
§ 54.13 Completeness and accuracy of information. ( a ) Information provided to the Commission by an applicant for a renewed license or information required by statute or by the Commission's regulations, orders, or license conditions to be maintained by the applicant must be complete and accurate in all material respects.
( b ) Each applicant shall notify the Commission of information identified by the applicant as having, for the regulated activity, a significant implication for public health and safety or common defense and security. An applicant violates this paragraph only if the applicant fails to notify the Commission of information that the applicant has identified as having a significant implication for public health and safety or common defense and security. Notification must be provided to the Administrator of the appropriate regional office within 2 working days of identifying the information. This requirement is not applicable to information that is already required to be provided to the Commission by other reporting or updating requirements.
| UNITED STATES        DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURERURAL UTILITIES        SERVICE        SUMMARY OF        ITEMS OF ENGINEERING INTEREST        JULY 1999
TABLE OF CONTENTS

ABBREVIATIONS

ENGINEERING and DESIGN

Revision of the 1997 National Electrical          Safety Code

Bulletin 1728F-803 Implementation

Errata and Comments to Bulletin 1728F-803

Guidelines for RUS Approval to Use Steel          Distribution Poles

Wood Equivalent Steel and Concrete Poles

Engineer’s Checklist for the Design of          Substations

    MATERIAL and PROCUREMENT

RUS Plans for Improving the List of          Materials

Distribution Line Anchor Coatings and Galvanizing

Security Lights – High Pressure Sodium          or Mercury Vapor?

RUS Acceptance of AMR Capable Meters and Financing AMR          Systems

Cable Insulation Failures from Abnormal Soil          Conditions

Keep Testing Your Underground Power Cable

RUS is Planning to Revise its Contract Forms

    OPERATIONS AND ENVIRONMENTAL

Substation Periodic Visual Inspections

7 CFR Part 1794 - RUS Environmental Policies          & Procedures

    ADMINISTRATIVE and OTHER

Y2K Update

RUS 2000 Electric Engineering Seminar

Seismic Safety

Water and Wastewater Roles for Rural Electric          Systems

RUS Technical Publications

Transmission and Distribution Engineering          Committee

Exhibit 1 – Conversion Table for 1728F-803

Exhibit 2 – Maximum Line Angles – Table    VII

Appendix A – ESD Directory

Appendix B – NRECA T&D Committee
  

[Return to Engineering] |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
# EUR-Lex - 31961R0007 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31961R0007

**EEC Council: Regulation No 7a adding certain products to the list in Annex II to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community **

*
Official Journal 007 , 30/01/1961 P. 0071 - 0072 Finnish special edition: Chapter 3 Volume 1 P. 0003 Swedish special edition: Chapter 3 Volume 1 P. 0003 Danish special edition: Series I Chapter 1959-1962 P. 0065 English special edition: Series I Chapter 1959-1962 P. 0068 Greek special edition: Chapter 03 Volume 1 P. 0003 Spanish special edition: Chapter 01 Volume 1 P. 0017 Portuguese special edition Chapter 01 Volume 1 P. 0017 *

REGULATION No 7a adding certain products to the list in Annex II to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC COMMUNITY,

Having regard to the provisions of the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community, and in particular Article 38 (3) thereof;

Having regard to the proposal from the Commission;

Whereas the addition of certain products to Annex II to the Treaty, on which the Council must take a decision within the period and under the conditions laid down in Article 38, will make applicable to those products the special and exceptional arrangements provided for in Articles 38 to 46 of the Treaty ; whereas only agricultural products for which these arrangements are considered necessary should therefore be added to the Annex;

Whereas the colouring or flavouring of sugars, syrups and molasses does not change these products sufficiently for there to be no risk of serious disturbances or fraud, which would be difficult to detect, if the products were made subject to arrangements differing from those governing non-coloured and non-flavoured sugars, syrups and molasses;

Whereas the processing of certain agricultural products into ethyl alcohol has distinct economic implications for these products, whose value it serves to increase substantially ; whereas the arrangements governing ethyl alcohol of agricultural origin cannot be separated from those governing basic products and must be taken into account when a common agricultural policy is established;

Whereas the vinegar market cannot be dissociated from the ethyl alcohol market or from the wine market;

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The following products shall be added to the list in Annex II to the Treaty: >PIC FILE= "T0050776">

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 31 December 1959.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 18 December 1959.

For the Council

The President

PELLA