alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
PUBLIC LAW 109–403—DEC. 18, 2006 120 STAT. 2755

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 5857:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 152 (2006):

Sept. 25, considered and passed House.

Dec. 6, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 109–403

109th Congress

An Act

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 1501 South

Cherrybell Avenue in Tucson, Arizona, as the ‘‘Morris K. ‘Mo’ Udall Post Office

Building’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MORRIS K. ‘‘MO’’ UDALL POST OFFICE BUILDING.

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal

Service located at 1501 South Cherrybell Avenue in Tucson,

Arizona, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Morris K. ‘Mo’

Udall Post Office Building’’.

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation,

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference

to the ‘‘Morris K. ‘Mo’ Udall Post Office Building’’.

Approved December 18, 2006.

Dec. 18, 2006

[H.R. 5857]
#### § 603.695 Requirements for supplies.

An expenditure-based TIA's provisions should permit participants to use their existing procedures to account for and manage supplies. A fixed-support TIA should not include requirements to account for or manage supplies.
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

CALVIN FLUKER, RICARDO

WRIGHT, BERYL JACKSON,

TRACEY MARTIN, LISA

PITCHFORD, KIMBERLY LOVE,

RESHANDA BROWN,

PLAINTIFFS,

v.

U.S. FOODSERVICE, INC. and

U.S. FOODSERVICE, INC. -

MONTGOMERY DIVISION,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

) CIVIL ACTION NO.:

)

) 2:06cv785-MHT

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

MOTION TO WITHDRAW MOTION FOR RETRACTION OF DOCUMENT

NUMBER 63

COME NOW, Plaintiff, Ricardo Wright by and through his counsel of

record and files this a motion to withdraw the motion for retraction of

document number 63. In support thereof, Plaintiff states as follows:

Plaintiff, Ricardo Wright decided to accept the Defendant’s Offer of

Judgment and therefore the motion for retraction of document number 63

should be withdrawn.

Plaintiff has contacted counsel for Defendant and informed them of the

Case 2:06-cv-00785-MHT-WC Document 68 Filed 02/05/2008 Page 1 of 3
2

error. Defendant will not be prejudiced by and has no objection to document

63 being retracted from the record.

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED Plaintiff request that this

honorable court enter an order granting it motion to withdraw the motion for

retraction of document 63 from the record.

Respectfully submitted,

s/ Ethan R. Dettling

Jon C. Goldfarb

Ethan R. Dettling

Counsel for Plaintiff

OF COUNSEL:

WIGGINS, CHILDS, QUINN & PANTAZIS, LLC

The Kress Building

301 19

th Street North

Birmingham, AL 35203

Telephone No.: (205) 314-0500

Facsimile No.: (205) 254-1500

Case 2:06-cv-00785-MHT-WC Document 68 Filed 02/05/2008 Page 2 of 3
3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I do hereby certify that I have on February 5, 2008, filed the foregoing

with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send

notification of such filing to the following:

Tammy L. Baker, Esq.

Jackson Lewis, LLP

First Commercial Bank Building

800 Shades Creek Parkway Suite 870

Birmingham, Alabama 35209

Facsimile No.: (205)332-3131

s/Ethan R. Dettling

OF COUNSEL

Case 2:06-cv-00785-MHT-WC Document 68 Filed 02/05/2008 Page 3 of 3
§ 5.125 Effect of other requirements. ( a ) *Effect of other Federal provisions.* The obligations imposed by these Title IX regulations are independent of, and do not alter, obligations not to discriminate on the basis of sex imposed by Executive Order 11246, 3 CFR, 1964-1965 Comp., p. 339; as amended by Executive Order 11375, 3 CFR, 1966-1970 Comp., p. 684; as amended by Executive Order 11478, 3 CFR, 1966-1970 Comp., p. 803; as amended by Executive Order 12087, 3 CFR, 1978 Comp., p. 230; as amended by Executive Order 12107, 3 CFR, 1978 Comp., p. 264; sections 704 and 855 of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 295m, 298b-2); Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000e *et seq.*); the Equal Pay Act of 1963 (29 U.S.C. 206); and any other Act of Congress or Federal regulation.
( b ) *Effect of State or local law or other requirements.* The obligation to comply with these Title IX regulations is not obviated or alleviated by any State or local law or other requirement that would render any applicant or student ineligible, or limit the eligibility of any applicant or student, on the basis of sex, to practice any occupation or profession.
( c ) *Effect of rules or regulations of private organizations.* The obligation to comply with these Title IX regulations is not obviated or alleviated by any rule or regulation of any organization, club, athletic or other league, or association that would render any applicant or student ineligible to participate or limit the eligibility or participation of any applicant or student, on the basis of sex, in any education program or activity operated by a recipient and that receives Federal financial assistance.
Exhibit 32.2



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report  of The  Topps  Company,  Inc.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the period ended August 27, 2005, as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the  "Report"),  I,
Catherine K. Jessup, Vice President-Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the
Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.





                                                 /s/ Catherine K. Jessup
                                                -------------------------
                                                     Catherine K. Jessup
                                                Vice President, Chief Financial
                                                    Officer and Treasurer



October 6, 2005
#### § 60.150 Scope.

As used in this part, *quality assurance* comprises all those planned and systematic actions necessary to provide adequate confidence that the geologic repository and its subsystems or components will perform satisfactorily in service. Quality assurance includes quality control, which comprises those quality assurance actions related to the physical characteristics of a material, structure, component, or system which provide a means to control the quality of the material, structure, component, or system to predetermined requirements.
# L_2023149EN.01000101.xml

| 9.6.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 149/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.6.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 149/1

---

Notice concerning the date of entry into force of the Agreement between the European Union and the Federative Republic of Brazil pursuant to Article XXVIII of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) 1994 relating to the modification of concessions on all the tariff rate quotas included in the EU Schedule CLXXV as a consequence of the United Kingdom's withdrawal from the European Union

The Agreement between the European Union and the Federative Republic of Brazil pursuant to Article XXVIII of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) 1994 relating to the modification of concessions on all the tariff rate quotas included in the EU Schedule CLXXV as a consequence of the United Kingdom’s withdrawal from the European Union (1), signed in Brussels on 1 February 2023, entered into force on 26 May 2023.

1

---

(1)  
  OJ L 142, 1.6.2023, p. 3.

1

---
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 397 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
H. Res. 397

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                         June 27, 2017.
Whereas more than 250,000 Americans died in the Second World War to liberate 
        Europe from the scourge of genocidal fascism;
Whereas in the wake of the cataclysm of the Second World War, the United States, 
        Canada, and European partners founded the North Atlantic Treaty 
        Organization (NATO) in Washington in 1949;
Whereas the foundation of NATO is collective defense as enumerated in Article 5 
        of the North Atlantic Treaty which states that, ``The Parties agree that 
        an armed attack against one or more of them in Europe or North America 
        shall be considered an attack against them all.'';
Whereas NATO is one of the most successful military alliances in history, 
        deterring the outbreak of another world war, protecting the territorial 
        integrity of its members, and seeing the Cold War through to a peaceful 
        conclusion;
Whereas Article 5 of the North Atlantic Treaty has only been invoked once in 
        history when alliance members came to the aid of the United States 
        following the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001;
Whereas NATO allies and partners, including Canada and countries in Central, 
        Eastern, and Northern Europe, including countries of the Western 
        Balkans, and the former Soviet Union have stood alongside the United 
        States in joint operations in the Western Balkans, Afghanistan, Iraq, 
        and elsewhere around the globe;
Whereas NATO remains the foundation of United States foreign policy of promoting 
        a Europe that is whole, free, and at peace;
Whereas at the Wales Summit in 2014, NATO leaders agreed that each alliance 
        member would spend at least 2 percent of its nation's gross domestic 
        product on defense by 2024;
Whereas multiple Presidents have reaffirmed the commitment of the United States 
        to the collective defense guarantees in Article 5 of the North Atlantic 
        Treaty; and
Whereas the Constitution of the United States grants Congress the sole power to 
        declare war: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) solemnly reaffirms the commitment of the United States to the 
        North Atlantic Treaty Organization's principle of collective defense as 
        enumerated in Article 5 of the North Atlantic Treaty;
            (2) strongly supports the decision at the NATO Wales Summit in 2014 
        that each alliance member would spend at least 2 percent of its nation's 
        gross domestic product on defense by 2024;
            (3) condemns any threat to the sovereignty, territorial integrity, 
        freedom and democracy of any NATO ally; and
            (4) welcomes the Republic of Montenegro as the 29th member of the 
        NATO Alliance.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Case 2:06-cv-00757-LES-CSC Document 4 Filed 09/11/2006 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATIONS



I, Paul C. Honda, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports
on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Honda Auto Receivables 2013-1
Owner Trust (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);



2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports,
taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing
and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange
Act periodic reports;



4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by
the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required
in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has
fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and



5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing
criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act
Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material
instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.



In giving the certifications above, I have
reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: MUFG Union Bank, N.A.



Date: June 10, 2016



|/s/ Paul C. Honda                                    | 
|---------------------------------------------------- | 
|Paul C. Honda                                        | 
|Vice President and Assistant Secretary               | 
|American Honda Finance Corporation                   | 
|(senior officer in charge of the servicing function) |
```

[109th Congress Public Law 305]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ305.109]

[[Page 120 STAT. 1719]]

Public Law 109-305
109th Congress

                                 An Act

 
 To amend the Railroad Retirement Act of 1974 to provide for continued 
   payment of railroad retirement annuities by the Department of the 
Treasury, and for other purposes. <<NOTE: Oct. 6, 2006 -  [H.R. 5074]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, <<NOTE: Railroad 
Retirement Technical Improvement Act of 2006.>> 
SECTION 1. <<NOTE: 45 USC 231t note.>> SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Railroad Retirement Technical 
Improvement Act of 2006''.
SEC. 2. DISBURSEMENT AGENT.

    Section 7(b)(4) of the Railroad Retirement Act of 1974 (45 U.S.C. 
231f(b)(4)) is amended so that subparagraph (A) reads as follows:
                    ``(A) The Secretary of the Treasury shall serve as 
                the disbursing agent for benefits payable under this 
                Act, under such rules and regulations as the Secretary 
                may in the Secretary's discretion prescribe.''.

    Approved October 6, 2006.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 5074:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 109-569 (Comm. on Transportation and Infrastructure).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 152 (2006):
            July 25, considered and passed House.
            Sept. 25, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 494 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 494

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                      October 18, 2005.
    Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker 
may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XVIII, declare the House resolved into the 
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of the 
bill (H.R. 554) to prevent legislative and regulatory functions from being 
usurped by civil liability actions brought or continued against food 
manufacturers, marketers, distributors, advertisers, sellers, and trade 
associations for claims of injury relating to a person's weight gain, obesity, 
or any health condition associated with weight gain or obesity. The first 
reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. All points of order against 
consideration of the bill are waived. General debate shall be confined to the 
bill and shall not exceed one hour equally divided and controlled by the 
chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on the Judiciary. After 
general debate the bill shall be considered for amendment under the five-minute 
rule. It shall be in order to consider as an original bill for the purpose of 
amendment under the five-minute rule the amendment in the nature of a substitute 
recommended by the Committee on the Judiciary now printed in the bill. The 
committee amendment in the nature of a substitute shall be considered as read. 
Notwithstanding clause 11 of rule XVIII, no amendment to the committee amendment 
in the nature of a substitute shall be in order except those printed in the 
report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution. Each such 
amendment may be offered only in the order printed in the report, may be offered 
only by a Member designated in the report, shall be considered as read, shall be 
debatable for the time specified in the report equally divided and controlled by 
the proponent and an opponent, shall not be subject to amendment, and shall not 
be subject to a demand for division of the question in the House or in the 
Committee of the Whole. All points of order against such amendments are waived. 
At the conclusion of consideration of the bill for amendment the Committee shall 
rise and report the bill to the House with such amendments as may have been 
adopted. Any Member may demand a separate vote in the House on any amendment 
adopted in the Committee of the Whole to the bill or to the committee amendment 
in the nature of a substitute. The previous question shall be considered as 
ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to final passage without intervening 
motion except one motion to recommit with or without instructions.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
PGI 206.302-2 Unusual and compelling

urgency.

(b) Application. The circumstances under which use of this authority may be appropriate include, but

are not limited to, the following:

(i) Supplies, services, or construction needed at once because of fire, flood, explosion, or other

disaster.

(ii) Essential equipment or repair needed at once to—

(A) Comply with orders for a ship;

(B) Perform the operational mission of an aircraft; or

(C) Preclude impairment of launch capabilities or mission performance of missiles or missile support

equipment.

(iii) Construction needed at once to preserve a structure or its contents from damage.

(iv) Purchase requests citing an issue priority designator under DoD Manual 4140.01, Volume 5,

DoD Supply Chain Materiel Management Procedures: Delivery of Material, of 4 or higher, or citing

“Electronic Warfare QRC Priority.”

Parent topic: PGI 206.302 Circumstances permitting other than full and open competition.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of ImClone Systems
Incorporated (the "Company") for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Daniel S. Lynch, Acting Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
     or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.

                                                  /s/ DANIEL S. LYNCH
                                          --------------------------------------
                                                     Daniel S. Lynch
                                              Acting Chief Executive Officer

November 12, 2003

     This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Rhode Island**

**Rhode Island 01**
#### THE HARRY R. WHEELER. THE B LINE. THE CITY OF NEW YORK.

(Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

November 11, 1912.)

No. 54.

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of New York.

Archibald R. Watson, Corp. Counsel, of New York City (Terence P. Farley and G. P. Nicholson, both of New York City, of counsel), for appellant.

Foley & Martin, of New York City (W. J. Martin and Frank A. Spencer, Jr., of counsel), for appellee claimant. Hyland & Zabriskie, of New York City (Nelson Zabriskie, of New York City, of counsel), for appellee libel-ant.

Before LACOMBE, WARD, and NOYES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The narrow channel rule (section 1, art. 25, Act June 7, 1897, c. 4, 30 Stat. 101 [U. S. Comp. St. 1909, p. 2883'J), requiring vessels to keep on the starboard side, applies to navigation up or down. Vessels may cross a narrow channel or maneuver in it. In this case the tug got on the port side in rounding to and before she could move to go upon the starboard side she met the ferryboat. The real question on which the case turns then arose, viz.: Were the vessels meeting green to green or red to red? Upon this point the contradiction between the witnesses is absolute, and, adopting the findings of the District Judge that the vessels were meeting green to green, we agree with his conclusion that the tug was not in fault because of the narrow channel rule, and that the ferryboat was at fault in porting and going across the tug’s course. Our doubt has been whether the tug was not *989also at fault, because hér green light was to some extent obscured. As the city, though fully advised of the situation, did not set this up as a fault in. its answer, and the District Judge has held that, even if so, it did not contribute to the collision, the decree is affirmed, with interest and costs.
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND

, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

John Edward Washington

, * From the 106 th District Court

of Gaines County

Trial Court No. 18

- 4903

.

Vs. No. 11

- 1 9

- 001 41

- CR * January 16 , 20 20

The State of Texas, * Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

(Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,

Stretcher, J., and Wright, S.C.J.,

sitting by assignment)

(Willson, J., not participating)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there

is no error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s

opinion, the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
2849.111 Review of proposed settlements.       The HCA or designee may establish procedures for the review and approval of settlement agreements at a level above the contracting officer. In addition, all proposed termination settlements shall be reviewed by legal counsel.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 2849.1 - General Principles