alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 61
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 61 appear at 80 FR 74980, Dec. 1, 2015, and at 81 FR 86909, Dec. 2, 2016.

§ 61.53 Environmental monitoring. ( a ) At the time a license application is submitted, the applicant shall have conducted a preoperational monitoring program to provide basic environmental data on the disposal site characteristics. The applicant shall obtain information about the ecology, meteorology, climate, hydrology, geology, geochemistry, and seismology of the disposal site. For those characteristics that are subject to seasonal variation, data must cover at least a twelve month period.
( b ) The licensee must have plans for taking corrective measures if migration of radionuclides would indicate that the performance objectives of subpart C may not be met.
( c ) During the land disposal facility site construction and operation, the licensee shall maintain a monitoring program. Measurements and observations must be made and recorded to provide data to evaluate the potential health and environmental impacts during both the construction and the operation of the facility and to enable the evaluation of long-term effects and the need for mitigative measures. The monitoring system must be capable of providing early warning of releases of radionuclides from the disposal site before they leave the site boundary.
( d ) After the disposal site is closed, the licensee responsible for post-operational surveillance of the disposal site shall maintain a monitoring system based on the operating history and the closure and stabilization of the disposal site. The monitoring system must be capable of providing early warning of releases of radionuclides from the disposal site before they leave the site boundary.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION

OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002



In connection with the Annual
Report of Nxt-ID, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2015, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Gino M. Pereira, Chief Executive Officer of Nxt-ID, Inc.,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best
of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Date:
    April 13, 2017 | By: | /s/ Gino M. Pereira          
|------------------------ | --- | -----------------------------
|                         |     | Gino M. Pereira              
|                         |     | Chief Executive Officer      
|                         |     | (Principal Executive Officer)
§ 490.308 Annual reporting requirements. ( a ) If a person is required to comply with the vehicle acquisition schedule in section 490.302, that person shall file an annual report under this section, on a form obtainable from DOE, with the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, U.S. Department of Energy, EE-33, 1000 Independence Ave., SW., Washington, DC 20585, or such other address as DOE may publish in the Federal Register, on or before the December 31 after the close of the applicable model year.
( b ) This report shall include the following information— ( 1 ) Number of new light duty motor vehicles acquired by the covered person in the United States during the model year;
( 2 ) Number of new light duty alternative fueled vehicles that are required to be acquired during the model year;
( 3 ) Number of new light duty alternative fueled vehicle acquisitions in the United States during the model year;
( 4 ) Number of alternative fueled vehicle credits applied towards acquisition requirements pursuant to § 490.505;
( 5 ) For each new light duty alternative fueled vehicle acquisition— ( i ) Vehicle make and model;
( ii ) Model year;
( iii ) Vehicle Identification Number;
( iv ) An indication of whether the vehicle is a dedicated vehicle or a dual fueled vehicle;
( v ) Type(s) of alternative fuel on which the vehicle is capable of operating;
( vi ) Acquisition date; and
( vii ) If the annual report shows that the covered person did not satisfy its alternative fueled vehicle acquisition mandate, an indication of whether the covered person intends to submit a request for exemption under § 490.307.
( c ) If banked alternative fueled vehicle credits are applied towards a covered person's alternative fueled vehicle acquisition requirements pursuant to § 490.505, or if allocation of alternative fueled vehicle credits is sought under subpart F of this part, then a credit activity report, as described in § 490.508, must be included with the annual report submitted under this section.
( d ) Records shall be maintained and retained for a period of three years.
[61 FR 10653, Mar. 14, 1996. Redesignated and amended at 79 FR 15904, Mar. 21, 2014]
Joint Committee on Taxation

May 8, 2001

JCX-36-01

DESCRIPTION OF CHAIRMAN’S AMENDMENT IN THE NATURE OF A

SUBSTITUTE TO H.R. 1727,

THE “FALLEN HERO SURVIVOR BENEFIT FAIRNESS ACT OF 2001”

Scheduled for a Markup by the House Committee on Ways and Means on May 9, 2001

Present Law

The Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997 provided that an amount paid as a survivor annuity on 

account of the death of a public safety officer who is killed in the line of duty is excludable from 

income to the extent the survivor annuity is attributable to the officer's service as a law 

enforcement officer. The survivor annuity must be provided under a governmental plan to the 

surviving spouse (or former spouse) of the public safety officer or to a child of the officer. 

Public safety officers include law enforcement officers, firefighters, rescue squad or ambulance 

crew. The provision does not apply with respect to the death of a public safety officer if it is 

determined by the appropriate supervising authority that (1) the death was caused by the 

intentional misconduct of the officer or by the officer's intention to bring about the death, (2) the 

officer was voluntarily intoxicated at the time of death, (3) the officer was performing his or her 

duties in a grossly negligent manner at the time of death, or (4) the actions of the individual to 

whom payment is to be made were a substantial contributing factor to the death of the officer.

The provision applies to amounts received in taxable years beginning after December 31, 

1996, with respect to individuals dying after that date.

Description of Proposal

The proposal would extend the present-law treatment of survivor annuities with respect to 

public safety officers killed in the line of duty with respect to individuals dying on or before 

December 31, 1996.

Effective Date

The provision would be effective with respect to payments received after December 31, 

2001.
§ 603.415 Cost sharing. To help ensure a competitive process that is fair and equitable to all potential proposers, the announcement should state clearly: ( a ) That, to the maximum extent practicable, the non-Federal parties carrying out a RD&D project under a TIA are to provide at least half of the costs of the project (see § 603.215(b));
( b ) The types of cost sharing that are acceptable;
( c ) How any in-kind contributions will be valued, in accordance with §§ 603.530 through 603.555; and
( d ) Whether any consideration will be given to alternative approaches a proposer may offer to demonstrate its strong commitment to and self-interest in the project's success, in accordance with § 603.215.
# EUR-Lex - 31984R1708 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31984R1708

**Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1708/84 of 19 June 1984 amending for the second time Regulation (EEC) No 65/82 laying down detailed rules for carrying forward sugar to the following marketing year **

*
Official Journal L 162 , 20/06/1984 P. 0007 - 0007 Spanish special edition: Chapter 03 Volume 31 P. 0052 Portuguese special edition Chapter 03 Volume 31 P. 0052 Finnish special edition: Chapter 3 Volume 17 P. 0160 Swedish special edition: Chapter 3 Volume 17 P. 0160 *

*****

COMMISSION REGULATION (EEC) No 1708/84

of 19 June 1984

amending for the second time Regulation (EEC) No 65/82 laying down detailed rules for carrying forward sugar to the following marketing year

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN

COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 1785/81 of 30 June 1981 on the common organization of the markets in the sugar sector (1), as last amended by Regulation (EEC) No 606/82 (2), and in particular Article 27 (3) thereof,

Whereas Article 27 of Regulation (EEC) No 1785/81 lays down that the beginning of the storage period for sugar which is carried forward to the following marketing year may vary according to when the sugar in question was produced; whereas Article 2 of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 65/82 (3), as amended by Regulation (EEC) No 948/82 (4), provides that the storage period begins on the date notified by the undertaking; whereas the date concerned may precede notification, thus allowing the undertaking to make the notification retroactive, which the said Article 27 did not intend; whereas it should therefore be laid down that the beginning of the storage period must henceforth not precede receipt of the notification;

Whereas the measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Sugar,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The fourth subparagraph of Article 2 (1) of Regulation (EEC) No 65/82 is hereby replaced by the following:

'For sugar carried forward the storage period referred to in Article 27 (2) of Regulation (EEC) No 1785/81 shall begin on the date notified by the undertaking to the competent body in the Member State concerned, provided that the conditions laid down in the first subparagraph have been complied with. The date may not, however, precede that on which the said body receives the notification. If the date stated in the application precedes that on which the notification is received, the storage period shall begin on the day on which the notification is received.'

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the third day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 19 June 1984.

For the Commission

Poul DALSAGER

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ No L 177, 1. 7. 1981, p. 4.

(2) OJ No L 74, 18. 3. 1982, p. 1.

(3) OJ No L 9, 14. 1. 1982, p. 14.

(4) OJ No L 113, 27. 4. 1982, p. 7.
# EUR-Lex - 31972D0279 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31972D0279

**72/279/EEC: Council Decision of 31 July 1972 setting up a Standing Committee for Agricultural Statistics **

*
Official Journal L 179 , 07/08/1972 P. 0001 - 0001 Finnish special edition: Chapter 3 Volume 4 P. 0235 Danish special edition: Series I Chapter 1972(III) P. 0797 Swedish special edition: Chapter 3 Volume 4 P. 0235 English special edition: Series I Chapter 1972(III) P. 0838 Greek special edition: Chapter 03 Volume 8 P. 0100 Spanish special edition: Chapter 03 Volume 6 P. 0060 Portuguese special edition Chapter 03 Volume 6 P. 0060 *

COUNCIL DECISION of 31 July 1972 setting up a Standing Committee for Agricultural Statistics (72/279/EEC)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community;

Having regard to the draft decision submitted by the Commission;

Whereas, for the purpose of facilitating their implementation, provision is made in acts adopted by the Council relating to agricultural statistics for a procedure establishing close cooperation between Member States and the Commission ; whereas, in order to achieve such cooperation, a Committee should be set up to carry out the duties assigned to it by such acts;

Whereas it is desirable that this Committee should consider any other question arising in connection with such acts,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

A Standing Committee for Agricultural Statistics (hereinafter called the "Committee") is hereby set up ; it shall consist of representatives of the Member States with a representative of the Commission as Chairman.

Article 2

The Committee shall carry out the duties assigned to it by the provisions adopted by the Council in the field of agricultural statistics in the cases and under the conditions provided for therein. It may, moreover, consider any other question arising in connection with such provisions and referred to it by the Chairman either on his own initiative or at the request of a Member State.

Article 3

The Committee shall adopt its own rules of procedure.

Done at Brussels, 31 July 1972.

For the Council

The President

T. WESTERTERP
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

DAVID SCOTT HASTINGS, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-1434 ) ELAINE LYNN SIRT-HASTINGS, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed November 8, 2019. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lee County; John S. Carlin, Judge. Christopher H. Brown of Brown, Suarez, Rios & Weinberg, P.A., Fort Myers, for Appellant. Elaine Lynn Sirt-Hastings, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
CASANUEVA, ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, and SMITH, JJ., Concur.
#### Hawk *v.*The State.

*Indictment for Murder j Application for Change of Venue.*

*1. Change of venue; hill of exceptions.*— Though the ruling of the trial court refusing an application for a change of *venue'*in a criminal case may now be reviewed and revised on appeal taken after final judgment of conviction (Code of 1886, § 4485), and though the judgment-entry shows the action of the court on such application, it is necessary, in order to bring such a case up for review, that there be a bill of exceptions setting out the evidence and showing exception to the ruling of the court.

2. *Bill of exceptions ; selection of jurors.*— The ruling of the trial court in reference to the selection of certain jurors can only be reviewed by bill of exceptions properly framed. It is not suliicient that the judgment-entry recites exceptions were taken to the action of the court in reference thereto.

Appeal from Jackson Circuit Court.

Tried before Hon. John B. Talley.

Appellant was indicted for tbe murder of Jobn Smith. He made application for -change of *venue,*which application ivas denied. Exceptions were taken to the selection of certain jurors. Hawk was found guilty and sentenced to the penitentiary for forty-five years. An. appeal was taken. No bill of exceptions appeared in the record.

T. N. McClellan, Attorney-General, for the State.

SOMENYILLE, J.

An application for a change of vefiue in a criminal case may now be reviewed and revised on appeal to this court, taken after final judgment of conviction. Code of 1880, § 4485.

But in order to bring such a case up for review, however, there must be a bill of exceptions setting out the evidence upon which the trial court acted, and duly reserving an exception to the ruling of the court in refusing to grant the application. It is insufficient for the action of the court to be shown by the judgment-entry alone, without a bill of exceptions.

The same is true of the rulings of the court in reference to the selection of certain jurors, to which the judgment-*7entry recites that exceptions were taken. These rulings can he reviewed only by bill of exceptions containing the evidence on which the court based its action.

There is no bill of exceptions contained in the record, and the appeal must be dismissed.
```

[Federal Register: October 15, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 199)]
[Notices]               
[Page 63470]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr15oc10-70]                         

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OPP-2010-0588; FRL-8850-8]

 
FIFRA Scientific Advisory Panel; Notice of Cancellation of Public 
Meeting

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Agency is issuing this notice to cancel a November 2-5, 
2010 meeting of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act 
(FIFRA) Scientific Advisory Panel (SAP) to consider and review the 
Chlorpyrifos Physiologically-Based Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic 
(PBPK/PD) Modeling linked to the Cumulative and Aggregate Risk 
Evaluation System (CARES). The meeting was announced in the Federal 
Register of September 15, 2010; it will be rescheduled for early 2011.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sharlene Matten, Designated Federal 
Official (DFO), Office of Science Coordination and Policy (7201M), 
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., 
Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone number: (202) 564-0130; fax 
number: (202) 564-8382; e-mail address: matten.sharlene@epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The November 2-5, 2010 meeting of the FIFRA 
SAP to consider and review the Chlorpyrifos Physiologically-Based 
Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic (PBPK/PD) Modeling linked to the 
Cumulative and Aggregate Risk Evaluation System (CARES) has been 
cancelled. The meeting was announced in the Federal Register of 
September 15, 2010 (75 FR 56101) (FRL-8843-6). It will be rescheduled 
for early 2011. For further information, please contact the DFO listed 
under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.

 List of Subjects

    Environmental protection, Pesticides and pests.

    Dated: October 7, 2010.
Frank Sanders,
Director, Office of Science Coordination and Policy.
[FR Doc. 2010-25910 Filed 10-14-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATIONS

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350



The undersigned hereby certifies that (i) the foregoing quarterly report on Form 10-Q filed by Fountain Powerboat Industries, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended March 31, 2008, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in that Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





|                   |  |                              
|------------------ |  | -----------------------------
|Date: May 15, 2008 |  | /s/ REGINALD M. FOUNTAIN, JR.
|                   |  | Reginald M. Fountain, Jr.    
|                   |  | Chief Executive Officer      
|                   |  |                              
|Date: May 15, 2008 |  | /s/ IRVING L. SMITH          
|                   |  | Irving L. Smith              
|                   |  | Chief Financial Officer
Case 2:06-cv-00765-ID-CSC Document 6 Filed 10/23/2006 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:06-cv-00765-ID-CSC Document 6 Filed 10/23/2006 Page 2 of 2
IV 

House Calendar No. 100 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 609 

[Report No. 115–401] 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 2201) to amend the Securities 

Act of 1933 to exempt certain micro-offerings from the registration 

requirements of such Act, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 7, 2017 

Mr. BUCK, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; 

which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 2201) to amend 

the Securities Act of 1933 to exempt certain microofferings from the registration requirements of such Act, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it 

2 shall be in order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 

3 2201) to amend the Securities Act of 1933 to exempt cer4 tain micro-offerings from the registration requirements of 

5 such Act, and for other purposes. All points of order 

6 against consideration of the bill are waived. The bill shall 


ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 609 RH 

1 be considered as read. All points of order against provi2 sions in the bill are waived. The previous question shall 

3 be considered as ordered on the bill and on any amend4 ment thereto to final passage without intervening motion 

5 except: (1) one hour of debate equally divided and con6 trolled by the chair and ranking minority member of the 

7 Committee on Financial Services; (2) the amendment 

8 printed in the report of the Committee on Rules accom9 panying this resolution, if offered by the Member des10 ignated in the report, which shall be in order without 

11 intervention of any point of order, shall be considered as 

12 read, shall be separately debatable for the time specified 

13 in the report equally divided and controlled by the pro14 ponent and an opponent, and shall not be subject to a 

15 demand for division of the question; and (3) one motion 

16 to recommit with or without instructions. 


ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with BILLS

ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with BILLS
House Calendar No. 100 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 609 

[Report No. 115–401] 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 2201) 

quirements of such Act, and for other purposes. certain micro-offerings from the registration reto amend the Securities Act of 1933 to exempt 

NOVEMBER 7, 2017 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 


ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with BILLS
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, SOUTHERN DIVISION

CHRISTINE BENNETT, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

v. ) 1:06cv723-MHT

) 

ARMY FLEET SUPPORT LLC, )

)

Defendant. )

ORDER

It is ORDERED that the motion to extend (doc. no. 32)

is granted. 

DONE, this the 11th day of June, 2007.

 /s/ Myron H. Thompson 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00723-MHT-CSC Document 33 Filed 06/11/2007 Page 1 of 1
PGI 227.7200 Scope of subpart.

(b) The contracting officer should consider the following additional guidance and information

regarding acquisition of computer software and computer software documentation:

(1) DoD Instruction 5000.74, Defense Acquisition of Services.

(2) DoD Instruction 5000.87, Operation of the Software Acquisition Pathway.

(3) DoD Instruction 5010.44, Intellectual Property (IP) Acquisition and Licensing.

Parent topic: PGI 227.72 - COMPUTER SOFTWARE, COMPUTER SOFTWARE DOCUMENTATION,

AND ASSOCIATED RIGHTS
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT L.P., ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-4783 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed December 5, 2018. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Kimberly Todd, Judge. Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Matthew J. Salvia, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Peter Koclanes, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

KELLY, LUCAS, and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.