alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Subpart 2146.2 - Contract Quality Requirements    **Parent topic:** PART 2146 - QUALITY ASSURANCE2146.201 General.       (a) This part prescribes policies and procedures to ensure that services acquired under the FEGLI Program contract conform to the contract's quality requirements.          (b) OPM will make an initial evaluation of the Contractor's system of internal controls under the quality assurance program required by 2146.270 of this chapter and will acknowledge in writing whether or not the system is consistent with the requirements set forth in this subpart. After the initial review, subsequent periodic reviews may be limited to changes in the Contractor's internal control guidelines. However, a limited review does not diminish the Contractor's obligation to apply the full internal control system.2146.270 FEGLI Program quality assurance requirements.       (a) The contractor shall develop and apply a quality assurance program specifying procedures for assuring contract quality, as directed by the contracting officer. At a minimum, the program should include procedures to address:          (1) Accuracy of payments and recovery of overpayments;          (2) Timeliness of payments to beneficiaries;          (3) Quality of services and responsiveness to beneficiaries;          (4) Quality of service and responsiveness to OPM; and          (5) Detection and recovery of fraudulent claims.          (b) The Contractor must prepare overpayment recovery guidelines to include a system of internal controls.          (c) The contracting officer may order the correction of a deficiency or a modification in the contractor's services and/or quality assurance program. The contractor shall take the necessary action promptly to implement the contracting officer's order. If the contracting officer orders the correction of a deficiency or a modification of the contractor's services and/or quality assurance program pursuant to this paragraph after the contract year has begun, the costs incurred in correcting the deficiency or making the modification will not be considered to the contractor's detriment in the cost control factor of the service charge [if applicable] for the following contract year. However, if there is a deficiency, the deficiency itself may be taken into consideration.2146.270-1 Contract clause.       The clause at 2152.246-70 shall be inserted in all FEGLI Program contracts.
#### § 600.160 Purpose of termination and enforcement.

Sections 600.161 and 600.162 set forth uniform suspension, termination and enforcement procedures.
#### § 205.374 Responses from “entities” designated in the application.

Each “entity” designated as a potential source of emergency assistance or as a potential supplier of transmission services and which has received a copy of the application under § 205.373, shall have three (3) calendar days from the time of receipt of the application to file the information designated below with the DOE. The DOE will grant extensions of the filing period when appropriate. The designated “entities” shall provide an analysis of the impact the requested action would have on its system reliability and its ability to supply its own interruptible and firm customers. The effects of the requested action on the ability to serve firm loads shall be clearly distinguished from the ability to serve contractually interruptible loads. The designated “entity” also may provide other information relevant to the requested action, which is not included in the reliability analysis. Copies of any response shall be provided to the applicant, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, any State Regulatory Agency having responsibility for service standards or rates of any “entity” that may be directly involved in the proposed action, and the appropriate Regional Electric Reliability Council. Pursuant to section 202(c) of the Federal Power Act, DOE may issue an emergency order even though a designated “entity” has failed to file a timely response.
303.1003 Requirements.       (b) The contracting officer, when notified of a possible contractor violation, in accordance with FAR 3.1003(b), shall notify the OIG and the HCA.          (c)(2) The contracting officer shall specify the title of HHS' OIG hotline poster and the Web site where the poster can be obtained in paragraph (b)(3) of the clause at FAR 52.203-14.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 303.10 - Contractor Code of Business Ethics and Conduct
H. Res. 394

In the House of Representatives, U.S., 

July 28, 2005.

Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall 

be in order to consider the conference report to accompany 

the bill (H.R. 6) to ensure jobs for our future with secure, 

affordable, and reliable energy. All points of order against the 

conference report and against its consideration are waived. 

The conference report shall be considered as read. 

Attest:

Clerk.
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------


                   CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, the undersigned, Louis P. Scheps, the President and
Chief Executive Officer, and Jeffery A. Baird, the Chief Financial Officer of
CAS Medical Systems, Inc., (the "issuer"), do hereby certify that the report on
Form 10-QSB accompanying this certification (the "report") fully complies with
the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that information contained in the report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the issuer.



/s/ Louis P. Scheps
-------------------------
Louis P. Scheps
Chairman of the Board, President and
Chief Executive Officer
CAS Medical Systems, Inc.
May 10, 2006





/s/ Jeffery A. Baird
-------------------------
Jeffery A. Baird
Chief Financial Officer
CAS Medical Systems, Inc.
May 10, 2006
Editorial Note on Part 37
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 37 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

§ 37.47 Security zones. ( a ) Licensees shall ensure that all aggregated category 1 and category 2 quantities of radioactive material are used or stored within licensee-established security zones. Security zones may be permanent or temporary.
( b ) Temporary security zones must be established as necessary to meet the licensee's transitory or intermittent business activities, such as periods of maintenance, source delivery, and source replacement.
( c ) Security zones must, at a minimum, allow unescorted access only to approved individuals through: ( 1 ) Isolation of category 1 and category 2 quantities of radioactive materials by the use of continuous physical barriers that allow access to the security zone only through established access control points. A physical barrier is a natural or man-made structure or formation sufficient for the isolation of the category 1 or category 2 quantities of radioactive material within a security zone; or
( 2 ) Direct control of the security zone by approved individuals at all times; or
( 3 ) A combination of continuous physical barriers and direct control.
( d ) For category 1 quantities of radioactive material during periods of maintenance, source receipt, preparation for shipment, installation, or source removal or exchange, the licensee shall, at a minimum, provide sufficient individuals approved for unescorted access to maintain continuous surveillance of sources in temporary security zones and in any security zone in which physical barriers or intrusion detection systems have been disabled to allow such activities.
( e ) Individuals not approved for unescorted access to category 1 or category 2 quantities of radioactive material must be escorted by an approved individual when in a security zone.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<CIK>                         000764794
<NAME>                        WESTERN INTERNATIONAL PIZZA CORP.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. DOLLARS


<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          0
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       397,500
<OTHER-SE>                                    (397,500)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   0
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                0
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   0
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (0.01)



</TABLE>
**Exhibit
      32.2**


CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO
 18
        U.S.C.
        SECTION 1350,
 AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
        connection with the amended Quarterly Report of Patient Safety Technologies,
        Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the fiscal quarter ended September
        30,
        2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
        (the "Report"), I, William B. Horne, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
        certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
        906
        of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
        The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
        The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 
 A
        signed
        original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
        to
        the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
        and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
 
 June
                8,
                2006
              /s/
                William B. HorneWilliam B. Horne
                Chief
                  Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 492 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 492

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                      October 18, 2005.
Whereas on October 8, 2005, a powerful earthquake measuring 7.6 on the Richter 
        Scale occurred in Pakistan and India, centered on the city of 
        Muzaffarabad;
Whereas the earthquake caused severe damage in both Pakistan and India;
Whereas the earthquake and continuing aftershocks have caused more than 50,000 
        deaths, resulted in serious injuries to additional tens of thousands of 
        people, and left between 2.5 and 3 million homeless as winter in the 
        affected mountainous region approaches;
Whereas millions of people throughout the affected region currently lack clean 
        water, food, proper sanitation, basic healthcare, adequate shelter, and 
        other necessities, thereby increasing the risk of additional suffering 
        and death; and
Whereas the United States and donors from at least 30 other countries have, to 
        date, pledged several hundred million dollars in emergency and long-term 
        reconstruction assistance, and have begun to deliver humanitarian 
        supplies to survivors of the earthquake: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) mourns the tragic loss of life and horrendous suffering caused 
        by the earthquake that occurred on October 8, 2005, in Pakistan and 
        India;
            (2) expresses the deepest condolences of the American people to the 
        families, communities, and governments of the tens of thousands of 
        individuals who lost their lives in this earthquake;
            (3) welcomes and commends the prompt international humanitarian 
        response to the earthquake by the governments of many countries, the 
        United Nations and other international organizations, and 
        nongovernmental organizations;
            (4) expresses gratitude and respect for the courageous and committed 
        work of all individuals providing aid, relief and assistance, including 
        United States civilian and military personnel, who are working to save 
        lives and provide relief in the devastated areas; and
            (5) supports the actions to assist the victims taken by the 
        President and the Government of the United States to provide all 
        appropriate assistance to the governments and people of the affected 
        region.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR

THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) CASE NO. 3:06-cr-208-MEF

) (WO)

JASON EDWARD COFIELD )

O R D E R

On September 29, 2006, the defendant filed a Motion to Suppress (Doc. #22). The

Magistrate Judge held a hearing on October 27, 2006 and a Recommendation was entered

on February 23, 2007. The government filed an objection (Doc. #45) to the

Recommendation on March 5, 2007. A final resolution of the motion to suppress has not

been rendered. While the granting of a continuance is left to the sound discretion of the trial

judge, United States v. Warren, 772 F.2d 827, 837 (11th Cir. 1985), the Court is, of course,

limited by the requirements of the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161. The Speedy Trial Act

provides generally that the trial of a defendant in a criminal case shall commence within 70

days of the latter of the filing date of the indictment or the date the defendant appeared before

a judicial officer in such matter. 18 U.S.C. §3161(c)(1); see United States v. Vasser, 916

F.2d 624 (11th Cir. 1990).

The Act excludes from this 70 day period any continuance that the judge grants "on

the basis of his findings that the ends of justice served by taking such action outweigh the

best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial." 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A).

Case 3:06-cr-00208-MEF-CSC Document 56 Filed 03/13/2007 Page 1 of 2
2

The Court concludes that a continuance of this case is warranted and that the ends of

justice served by continuing this case outweighs the best interest of the public and the

defendant in a speedy trial. See United States v. Davenport, 935 F.2d 1223, 1235 (11th Cir.

1991)(reasonable time necessary for effective preparation is a significant factor for granting

a continuance under the Speedy Trial Act).

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the trial of this case is continued from the

March 26, 2007 trial term to the April 23, 2007 trial term.

DONE this the 13th day of March, 2007.

 /s/ Mark E. Fuller 

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cr-00208-MEF-CSC Document 56 Filed 03/13/2007 Page 2 of 2
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Audit  Tax  Advisory

Grant Thornton LLP

1201 Walnut St, Suite 2200

Kansas City, Missouri 64106

T 816.412.2400

F 816.412.2404



Board of Directors

Situs Holdings, LLC



We have examined management’s assertion, included in
the accompanying Certification Regarding Compliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria (“Management’s Assertion”),
that Situs Holdings, LLC (the “Company”) complied with servicing criteria set forth in Items 1117, 1119, 1122(d)(3)(i)
and 1122(d)(4)(vii) of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB for the Operating or Trust Advisor Services
Platform (the “Platform) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016. The platform consists of asset-backed transactions
and securities defined by management in Appendix B of Management’s report. Management is responsible for the Company’s
compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assertion
about the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicing criteria for the Platform based on our examination.



Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards
of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence
about the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicing criteria for the Platform and performing such other procedures
as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing selected asset-backed transactions and securities
constituting the Platform and evaluating whether the Company performed servicing activities related to those transactions and securities
in compliance with the applicable servicing criteria for the period covered by this report. Accordingly, our testing may not have
included servicing activities related to each asset-backed transaction or security constituting the Platform. Further, our examination
was not designed to detect material noncompliance that may have occurred prior to the period covered by this report and that may
have affected the Company’s servicing activities during the period covered by this report. We believe that our examination
provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company’s compliance
with the applicable servicing criteria.



In our opinion, management’s assertion that Situs Holdings,
LLC complied with the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016, for the Platform
is fairly stated, in all material respects.





/s/ Grant Thornton LLP



Kansas City, Missouri



February 28, 2017
H. Res. 39 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

January 10, 2017. 

Resolved, That the following named Member be, and is 

hereby, elected to the following standing committee of the 

House of Representatives: 

COMMITTEE ON HOUSE ADMINISTRATION: Ms. Lofgren. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the period ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Philip L. Hurst, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge: (1)

          The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2)

          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated. Date: September 27, 2013 By:

          /s/ Philip L. HurstName: Philip L. Hurst Title: President and Chief Executive Officer
ex10-16a.htm


    Exhibit
10.16(a)

    


    The
following Amendment to the Health and Welfare Plan was adopted by the Board of
Directors of Minerals Technologies Inc. at its regularly scheduled meeting held
on May 19, 2009:

    


    


    RESOLVED, that the definition
of Retiree at Section 1.27 of the Minerals Technologies Inc. Health and Welfare
Plan ("the Plan") is amended so as to read in its entirety as
follows:

    


    
      	
              1.27  

            	
              Retiree.  A
      Former Employee of an Employer who was hired by an Employer before January
      1, 2004, and who completes at least twenty (20) "years of creditable
      service" after the attainment of age 40.  For purposes of the
      foregoing, years of creditable service shall have the meaning set forth in
      the Minerals Technologies Inc. Retirement
Plan.
§ 603.880 Reports requirements. A TIA must include requirements that, as a minimum, provide for periodic reports addressing program performance and, if it is an expenditure-based award, business/financial status. The contracting officer must require submission of the reports at least annually, and may require submission as frequently as quarterly (this does not preclude a recipient from electing to submit more frequently than quarterly the financial information that is required to process payment requests if the award is an expenditure-based TIA that uses reimbursement or advance payments under § 603.810(a)). The requirements for the content of the reports are as follows: ( a ) The program portions of the reports must address progress toward achieving performance goals and milestones, including current issues, problems, or developments.
( b ) The business/financial portions of the reports, applicable only to expenditure-based awards, must provide summarized details on the status of resources (federal funds and non-federal cost sharing), including an accounting of expenditures for the period covered by the report. The report should compare the resource status with any payment and expenditure schedules or plans provided in the original award; explain any major deviations from those schedules; and discuss actions that will be taken to address the deviations. The contracting officer may require a recipient to separately identify in these reports the expenditures for each participant in a consortium and for each programmatic milestone or task, if the contracting officer, after consulting with the program official, judges that those additional details are needed for good stewardship.
Exhibit 10.8






Exhibit 10.8




Heska Corporation 2010 Management Incentive Plan




The following is intended to implement the Heska Corporation Management Incentive Plan Master
Document for the year beginning on January 1, 2010 and ending on December 31, 2010 (the “2010
MIP”). The Compensation Committee has agreed on the following for the 2010 MIP.




1) The Category Percentages for the 2010 MIP are as follows:




	 	 	 	 	 
	Chief Executive Officer
	 	50.0% of base pay
	President
	 	35.0% of base pay
	Chief Financial Officer
	 	35.0% of base pay
	Vice Presidents
	 	35.0% of base pay
	Directors
	 	25.0% of base pay






2) The Plan Allocation for the 2010 MIP is as follows:




75% on overall achievement of the company-wide financial objective and 25% on individual
performance




3) The Key Parameters for the 2010 MIP is as follows:




Pre-MIP Operating Income




4) The Payout Structure for the 2010 MIP is as follows:




53% of Pre-MIP Operating Income above $3,257,000, with a maximum MIP Payout of $1,500,000 (the
“Maximum MIP Payout”). Any MIP payment in excess of the Maximum MIP Payout shall be at the sole
and absolute discretion of the Compensation Committee.
3023.9000 Contract clause (USCG).       For the U.S. Coast Guard, where all or part of a contract will be performed on Government-owned or leased property, the contracting officer shall insert the clause at (HSAR) 48 CFR 3052.223–90, Accident and Fire Reporting.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 3023.90—Safety Requirements for USCG Contracts