alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of David W., Appellant.

Order unanimously reversed on the law and facts and petition dismissed. Memorandum: This 11-year-old boy appeals from an order adjudicating him to be “ a person in need of supervision” within the meaning of subdivision (b) of section 712 of the Family Court Act. The petition charged the boy with “ wilfully and wrongly ” grabbing a girl, carrying her into the school garage, blocking the doorway, and placing her in fear for her safety. This single incident if committed by an adult would be a violation of section 240.25 of the Penal Law which classifies such conduct as “ harassment ”. The section further provides that *“*Harassment is a violation ”. A *“*violation ” may not be the basis of a juvenile delinquency proceeding because a juvenile is defined as a person over 7 and less than 16 who does an act, which if done by an adult, would constitute a “crime” (Family Ct. Act, § 712, subd. [a]). A crime is defined in the revised Penal Law as a misdemeanor or a felony. These exclude a “violation” which is *1101defined as an *“*offense ”. It may well be that the Family Court Act should be amended to bring within its purview those children who commit any “ offense ”, not only an act designated as a “ crime ”, but such proposed legislation, although passed by the Legislature, has been vetoed by the Governor. The Family Court Judge, faced with this dilemma, found the boy *“*a person in need of supervision”. This finding does not meet the test of the statute which mandates that the proof must show that the boy is *“*an habitual truant or who is incorrigible, ungovernable or habitually disobedient and beyond the lawful control of parent or other lawful authority ”. The record is silent on any misbehavior other than this single act of “ harassment ”. As stated in our decision in *Matter of Bordone*v. *Allen F.*(33 A D 2d 890), there must he more than a single isolated incident to support a determination of “ need of supervision ”. A pattern of conduct which satisfies subdivision (b) of section 712 of the Family Court Act must be proved *(Matter of Richard W.,*29 A D 2d 873). Under these circumstances we must reverse and dismiss the petition. (Appeal from order of Erie -County Family Court placing respondent under supervision.) Present—Goldman, P. J., Marsh, Witmer, Moule and Henry, JJ.
Exhibit 15.1




CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM




The Board of Directors




Mazor Robotics Ltd.:




We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos. 333-190372 and 333-198213) on Form S-8 of Mazor Robotics Ltd. of our report dated April 28, 2015, with respect to the consolidated statements of financial position of Mazor Robotics Ltd. as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, and the related consolidated statements of comprehensive income, changes in equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2014, which report appears in the December 31, 2014 annual report on Form 20-F of Mazor Robotics Ltd.




/s/ Somekh Chaikin




Certified Public Accountants (Israel)




Member firm of KPMG International




Haifa, Israel




April 28, 2015
Exhibit 32.2



Citizens Financial Corp.



Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley

Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350



I, Thomas K. Derbyshire, Vice President, Treasurer and Principal Financial Officer of Citizens Financial Corp. (the company) certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
that:



|1. | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the company for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|              |  |                                                                           
|------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------
|              | 
|Date: 11/9/05 |  | /s/ Thomas K. Derbyshire                                                  
|              |  | Thomas K. Derbyshire Vice President,
Treasurer Principal Financial Officer
#### AJAX GRIEB RUBBER CO. v. MARSHALL.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department.

December 4, 1914.)

Appeal and Error (§ 1175*)—Disposition—Judgment for Party.

Where the record showed that plaintiff established a prima facie case entitling it to recover $32 from defendant, but did not disclose any defense thereto, a judgment for defendant will be reversed, and a judgment for that amount awarded to plaintiff.

[Ed. Note.—For other cases, see Appeal and Error, Cent. Dig. §§ 4573-4587; Dec. Dig. § 1175.*]

Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Third District.

Action by the Ajax Grieb Rubber Company against Raymond W. Marshall. From a judgment for defendant, and from an order denying plaintiff’s motion to vacate and set aside the judgment as contrary to the evidence and the law, plaintiff appeals. Reversed, and judgment awarded plaintiff.

Argued October term, 1914, before SEABURY, BIJUR, and COHABAN, JJ.

Henry Hoelljes, of New York City, for appellant.

Harold C. Mitchell, of New York City, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

While the record in this case is in a confused condition, it does appear that the plaintiff established a prima facie case entitling it to recover $32 from the defendant. A careful examination of the record has failed to disclose any defense to the cause of action proved on behalf of the plaintiff.

It follows that the judgment should be reversed, and judgment awarded for the plaintiff for $32 and the costs taxable in the Municipal Court, together with the costs of this appeal.
#### In the Matter of Charles Yasmer, Petitioner, v Gordon M. Ambach, as Commissioner of Education of the State of New York, et al., Respondents.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (initiated in this court pursuant to subdivision 4 of section 6510 of the Education Law) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Education, which suspended petitioner’s license to practice podiatry for a period of three months and imposed a fine of $1,000. Petitioner’s contention that the penalty imposed is disproportionate to the offense and shocking to one’s sense of fairness is without merit (see *Matter of Foreman v Board of Regents of Univ. of State of N. Y.,*75 AD2d 953, mot for lv to app den 51 NY2d 704). We have examined petitioner’s other contentions and find them to be unpersuasive. Determination confirmed, and petition dismissed, without costs. Greenblott, J. P., Main, Mikoll and Casey, JJ., concur; Staley, Jr., J., not taking part.
# EUR-Lex - 31988D0018 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31988D0018

**88/18/EEC: Commission Decision of 22 December 1987 amending Decision 87/119/EEC as regards the list of establishments in Brazil approved for the purpose of importing meat products into the Community **

*
Official Journal L 009 , 13/01/1988 P. 0014 - 0015 *

*****

COMMISSION DECISION

of 22 December 1987

amending Decision 87/119/EEC as regards the list of establishments in Brazil approved for the purpose of importing meat products into the Community

(88/18/EEC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community,

Having regard to Council Directive 77/99/EEC of 21 December 1976 on health problems affecting intra-Community trade in meat products (1), as last amended by Regulation (EEC) No 3768/85 (2), and in particular Article 17 (1) thereof,

Whereas a list of establishments in Brazil, approved for the purpose of importing meat products into the Community, was drawn up initially by Commission Decision 87/119/EEC (3), as last amended by Decision 87/440/EEC (4);

Whereas a Community on-the-spot visit to meat product establishments in Brazil has revealed that the level of hygiene in one establishment has altered since the last inspection; whereas the list of establishments should be amended accordingly;

Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Veterinary Committee,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The Annex to Decision 87/119/EEC is hereby replaced by the Annex to this Decision.

Article 2

This Decision is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 22 December 1987.

For the Commission

Frans ANDRIESSEN

Vice-President

(1) OJ No L 26, 31. 1. 1977, p. 85.

(2) OJ No L 362, 31. 12. 1985, p. 8.

(3) OJ No L 49, 18. 2. 1987, p. 37.

(4) OJ No L 238, 21. 8. 1987, p. 39.

ANNEX

LIST OF ESTABLISHMENTS

1.2.3 // // // // Approval No // Establishment // Address // // // // SIF 7 // Swift Armour SA Indústria e Comércio // Santana do Livramento, Rio Grande do Sul // SIF 10 // Frigorífico Bordon SA // São Paulo, São Paulo // SIF 34 // Swift Armour SA // S. André, São Paulo // SIF 76 // SA Frigorífico Anglo // Barretos, São Paulo // SIF 226 // Frigorífico Bordon SA // Bagé, Rio Grande do Sul // SIF 381 // Frigorífico Kaiowa SA // Guarulhos, São Paulo // SIF 385 // Frigorífico Mouran SA // Andradina, São Paulo // SIF 736 // Sola SA Indústrias Alimentícias // Três Rios, Rio de Janeiro // SIF 1676 // Swift Armour SA Indústria e Comércio // Uberlândia, Minas Gerais // SIF 2015 // Sadia Oeste SA Indústria e Comércio // Várzea Grande, Mato Grosso // SIF 2023 // Frigorífico Quatro Rios SA // Votuporanga, São Paulo // // //
2007-0912.

#### In re L.A.B.

Summit App. No. 23309, 2007-Ohio-1479. It is ordered by the court, sua sponte, that this cause is no longer held for the decision in *In re C.S.,*115 Ohio St.3d 267, 874 N.E.2d 1177, 2007-Ohio-4919. It is further ordered by the court that the parties are to brief the issue stated in the court of appeals’ Journal Entry filed April 18, 2007, as follows: “Does Juvenile Rule 29 apply to probation revocation hearings in juvenile court?”

It is ordered by the court that the Clerk shall issue an order for the transmittal of the record from the Court of Appeals for Summit County.

It is further ordered by the court that the briefing in this cause and 2007-0895, *In re L.A.B.,*
      *1444Summit App. No. 23309, 2007-Ohio-1479, shall be consolidated. The parties shall file two originals of each of the briefs permitted under S.Ct.Prac.R. VI and include both case numbers on the cover page of the briefs. The parties shall otherwise comply with the requirements of S.CtPrae.R. VI.
873.118 Debriefings.

Offerors whose proposals are not accepted under a competitive request for proposals (RFP) may

submit a written request for a debriefing to the contracting officer. Without regard to FAR 15.505,

preaward debriefings may be conducted by the contracting officer when determined to be in the

best interest of the Government. Post-award debriefings shall be conducted in accordance with FAR

15.506. (38 U.S.C. 8153)

Parent topic: PART 873 - SIMPLIFIED PROCEDURES FOR HEALTH-CARE RESOURCES
steam

_ record - Re: FW: Steam Electric Power In formation Request - Extension Request

Greetings,

This e-mail is a confirmation that your exte nsion request for the steam electric effluent guidelines questionnaire for JT Deely (P lant ID:04017) and OW Sommers (Plant ID:03141) was received. Extension requests will be ev aluated on a case-by-case basis. Please be aware that submittal of an extension request to EPA does not alter the due date of your questionnaire unless and until EPA agrees to the extension and establishes a new date. Verification of delivery status of questionnaire package for JK Pruce was forwarded to the steam electric helpline. You should hear back from them soon with tracking information.

Sincerely,

-----"Tieken, Gregg R." <GRTieke n@CPSEnergy.com> wrote: -----

To: Jezebele Alicea/DC/USEPA/US@EPA From: <Alicea.Jezebele @ epamail.epa. g ov> To: "Tieken, Gregg R." <GRTieken@CPSEnergy.com> Date: 7/15/2010 7:08 AM Sub j ect: Re: FW: Steam Electric Power Information Request - Extension Reques t Pa g e 1 of 2

8/17/2011 file://C:\Documents and Settin g s\TMedle y \Local Settin g s\Tem p \XP g r p wise\4C3EB403D

...From: "Tieken, Gregg R." <GRTieken@CPSEnergy.com> Date: 07/14/2010 06:08PM Subject: FW: Steam Electric Power In formation Request - Extension Request

Jezebele Alicea,

City Public Service of San Antonio received Information Collection Requ ests for the follo wing facilities: JT Deely (Plant ID: 04017) and OW So mmers (Plant ID: 0 3141) facilities. Due to t he extent of information requested, City Public Service of San Antonio is req uesting an extension to complete the questionnaire. The plant manager received them in her possession on June 23 rd or 24 th . According to the FedEx tracking, the packages were received in our storeroom on June 21 st . This request will be greatly appreciated.

According to the EPA “Mail List for the Steam Electric Questionnaire” ou r JK Spruce facility was listed to receive version 2. To date, the refe renced facility has not re ceived a questionnaire. Pl ease advise on status.

Thanks,

Gregg Tieken

CPS Energy

Manager, Environmental

210-353-2158 Office

210-837-2607 Cell Pa g e 2 of 2

8/17/2011 file://C:\Documents and Settin g s\TMedle y \Local Settin g s\Tem p \XP g r p wise\4C3EB403D

...
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 611 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 611

Condemning, in the strongest possible terms, Iranian President Mahmoud 
  Ahmadinejad's outrageous and despicable statements directed toward 
                                Israel.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 15, 2005

Mr. Dent submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                  Committee on International Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Condemning, in the strongest possible terms, Iranian President Mahmoud 
  Ahmadinejad's outrageous and despicable statements directed toward 
                                Israel.

Whereas the Islamic Republic of Iran has, in the past, threatened Israel with 
        nuclear attack and has aggressively pursued a clandestine effort to arm 
        itself with nuclear weapons;
Whereas Iran funds, trains, and openly supports terrorist groups that are 
        determined to destroy Israel;
Whereas on October 26, 2005, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, President of the Islamic 
        Republic of Iran, declared that ``Israel must be wiped off the map'', 
        described Israel as ``a disgraceful blot [on] the face of the Islamic 
        world'', and declared that ``[a]nybody who recognizes Israel will burn 
        in the fire of the Islamic nation's fury''; and
Whereas on December 14, 2005, President Ahmadinejad continued his relentless 
        attack on Israel by saying that the Holocaust was a myth and that the 
        Jewish state should be moved to Europe or North America; Now, therefore, 
        be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) condemns, in the strongest possible terms, Iranian 
        President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's outrageous and despicable 
        statements directed toward Israel and demands that he repudiate 
        them;
            (2) reaffirms the unwavering alliance between the United 
        States and Israel and reasserts the commitment of the United 
        States to defend the right of Israel to exist as a free and 
        democratic state in the Middle East;
            (3) condemns, in the strongest possible terms, those world 
        leaders such as Iranian President Ahmadinejad who espouse or 
        encourage anti-Semitism; and
            (4) reaffirms the existence of the Holocaust as an 
        historical event and condemns those who deny that it occurred.
                                 <all>
```
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Steven C. Bierman, certify that:

 

1.             I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of CNH Equipment Trust 2013-A (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

 

2.             Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.             Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4.             I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and

 

5.             All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas.

 

----

 

March 27, 2014

 
|   |   |                                                             |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | By:    | /s/   Steven C. Bierman                                          |
|   | Name:  | Steven   C. Bierman                                              |
|   | Title: | President   (senior officer in charge of the servicing function) |

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 564 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 564

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                     November 18, 2005.
    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider the conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 2528) making 
appropriations for military quality of life functions of the Department of 
Defense, military construction, the Department of Veterans Affairs, and related 
agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2006, and for other purposes. 
All points of order against the conference report and against its consideration 
are waived. The conference report shall be considered as read.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT of 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of Axiom Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2014 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Annual Report”), Tyler Pearson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1.

   The Annual Report, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.

   The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  By:

   /s/ Tyler PearsonTyler PearsonPrincipal Executive Officer
 Dated: April 30, 2015
#### State of Kansas, *Appellant,*v. Herman G. Barker, *Appellee.*

No. 47,931

Opinion filed January 24, 1976.

*Robert L. Kennedy, Jr.,*assistant district attorney, argued the cause, and *Curt T. Schneider,*attorney general, *Keith Sanborn,*district attorney, and *Stephen M. Joseph,*assistant district attorney, were on the brief for the appellant.

*Don Matlack,*of Wichita, argued the cause and was on the brief for the appellee.

Foth, C.

Affirmed.
<PAGE>

Exhibit 3(h)

                                                           STATE OF DELAWARE
                                                           SECRETARY OF STATE
                                                        DIVISION OF CORPORATIONS
                                                        FILE 03:30 PM 03/26/1992
                                                           920865285 - 2007979

                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                       OF
                          CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                           ENCORE COMPUTER CORPORATION

     ENCORE COMPUTER CORPORATION (the "Corporation"), organized and existing
under, and by virtue of, the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware,

     DOES HEREBY CERTIFY:

     FIRST: That Article FOURTH of the Corporation's Certificate of
Incorporation be, and hereby is, amended to read in its entirety as follows:

     FOURTH:    The total number of shares of stock which the Corporation shall
                have the authority to issue is 100,000,000 shares of which
                90,000,000 shares shall be Common Stock, $.01 par value, and
                10,000,000 shares shall be Preferred Stock, $.01 par value. The
                Preferred Stock may be divided into, and may be issued from time
                to time in, one or more series. The Board of Directors is
                authorized from time to time to establish and designate one or
                more series of Preferred Stock, to fix and determine the
                variations in the relative rights and preferences as between the
                different series, and to fix and alter the number of shares
                comprising any such series and the designation thereof.

     SECOND: That the amendment above was duly adopted in accordance with the
provisions of Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of
Delaware.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused this Certificate to the
signed by its President and attested by its Secretary this 18 day of June, 1991.

                                                ENCORE COMPUTER CORPORATION

                                                BY: /s/ Kenneth G. Fisher
                                                    ----------------------------
                                                    Kenneth G. Fisher, Chairman

ATTEST:

By: /s/ T. Mark Morley
    -----------------------------
    T. Mark Morley, Secretary

                                                                       194lt/300