alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
The Schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the financial
statements  for Summit Tax Exempt L.P.  III and is  qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements
</LEGEND>

<CIK>                           0000812220
<NAME>                          Summit Tax Exempt L.P. III
<MULTIPLIER>                    1       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1997
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                             136,826
<SECURITIES>                                    44,969,792
<RECEIVABLES>                                      129,358
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                         0
<PP&E>                                                   0
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  45,872,915
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              353,668
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                      45,519,247
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    45,872,915
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,494,414
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   199,428
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,294,986
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      0
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,294,986
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          .37
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0
                                               


</TABLE>
§ 50.103 Suspension and operation in war or national emergency. ( a ) Whenever Congress declares that a state of war or national emergency exists, the Commission, if it finds it necessary to the common defense and security, may, ( 1 ) Suspend any license it has issued.
( 2 ) Cause the recapture of special nuclear material.
( 3 ) Order the operation of any licensed facility.
( 4 ) Order entry into any plant or facility in order to recapture special nuclear material or to operate the facility.
( b ) Just compensation shall be paid for any damages caused by recapture of special nuclear material or by operation of any facility, pursuant to this section.
[21 FR 355, Jan. 19, 1956, as amended at 35 FR 11416, July 17, 1970; 40 FR 8790, Mar. 3, 1975]
#### Mountains Realty Corp., Respondent, v Esther Gelbelman, Appellant.

[816 NYS2d 150]

In an action to compel specific performance of a contract for the sale of real property, the defendant appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Barasch, J.), dated August 20, 2004, as granted the plaintiffs motion to direct the defendant’s former attorney to release the down payment held in its escrow account to the plaintiff, and denied her cross motion, in effect, for leave to renew and reargue her prior motion to vacate a judgment dated August 13, 2002, entered against her upon her default in appearing or answering the complaint.

Ordered that the appeal from so much of the order as denied that branch of the cross motion which was, in effect, for leave to reargue is dismissed, as no appeal lies from an order denying re-argument; and it is further,

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as reviewed; and it is further,

Ordered that one bill of costs is awarded to the plaintiff.

In support of its motion, the plaintiff submitted documentary *875evidence establishing that the outstanding obligations of the defendant exceeded the contract purchase price. Thus, the plaintiff established its entitlement to a return of the down payment being held in escrow so that it could apply that sum toward the payment of the defendant’s obligations under the terms of the contract of sale.

The Supreme Court incorrectly treated that branch of the defendant’s cross motion which sought to vacate the default judgment on the ground that it was not enforced according to its terms, as one for leave to reargue, as opposed to one for leave to renew. The court nonetheless properly denied that branch of the cross motion as the facts proffered in support thereof would not have changed the outcome *(see*CPLR 2221 [e] [2]; *Steinberg v Steinberg,*15 AD3d 388, 389 [2005]; *Kingston v Brookdale Hosp. & Med. Ctr.,*4 AD3d 397, 398 [2004]).

The Supreme Court properly treated that branch of the defendant’s cross motion which sought to vacate the default judgment based upon CPLR 5015 as one for reargument because it was not based upon new facts which were unavailable at the time of her prior motion. No appeal lies from an order denying reargument *(see Scoma v Doe,*2 AD3d 432, 433 [2003]; *Mucciola v City of New York,*177 AD2d 553, 554 [1991]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Miller, J.P., Ritter, Skelos and Lifson, JJ., concur.
###### Editorial Note on [Part 26](/current/title-10/part-26?toc=1)

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 26 appear at [87 FR 71455](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/87-FR-71455), Nov. 22, 2022.

#### § 26.133 Cutoff levels for drugs and drug metabolites.

Subject to the provisions of [§ 26.31(d)(3)(iii)](/on/2024-09-17/title-10/section-26.31#p-26.31(d)(3)(iii)), licensees and other entities may specify more stringent cutoff levels for drugs and drug metabolites than those in Table 1 to [§ 26.133](/on/2024-09-17/title-10/section-26.133) and, in such cases, may report initial test results for only the more stringent cutoff levels. Otherwise, the following cutoff levels must be used for initial testing of urine specimens to determine whether they are negative or positive for the indicated drugs and drug metabolites:

Table 1 to [§ 26.133](/on/2024-09-17/title-10/section-26.133)—Urine, Initial Test Cutoff Levels for Drugs and Drug Metabolites

| Drugs or drug metabolites | Cutoff level [nanograms (ng)/mL] |
| --- | --- |
| Marijuana metabolites | 50 |
| Cocaine metabolites | 150 |
| Opioids: | |
| Codeine/Morphine1 | 2,000 |
| Hydrocodone/Hydromorphone | 300 |
| Oxycodone/Oxymorphone | 100 |
| 6-acetylmorphine (6-AM) | 10 |
| Phencyclidine (PCP) | 25 |
| Amphetamines:2 | |
| AMP/MAMP3 | 500 |
| MDMA4/MDA5 | 500 |
| | |
| --- | --- |
| 1 Morphine is the target analyte for codeine/morphine testing. | |
| 2 Either a single initial test kit or multiple initial test kits may be used provided the single test kit detects each target analyte independently at the specified cutoff. | |
| 3 Methamphetamine (MAMP) is the target analyte for amphetamine (AMP)/MAMP testing. | |
| 4 Methylenedioxymethamphetamine. | |
| 5 Methylenedioxyamphetamine. | |

[[87 FR 71459](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/87-FR-71459), Nov. 22, 2022]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000764579
<NAME> CAS MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC.

<S>                                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                          3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                                    DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                                         MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                                                 1,440,321
<SECURITIES>                                                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                          1,632,218
<ALLOWANCES>                                                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                                            1,734,667
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                       4,993,773
<PP&E>                                                                 3,382,358
<DEPRECIATION>                                                           962,122
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                         7,624,409
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                  1,290,786
<BONDS>                                                                        0
<COMMON>                                                                  37,831
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                          0
<PREFERRED>                                                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                                                             2,329,817
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                           7,624,409
<SALES>                                                                2,917,082
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                       3,003,526
<CGS>                                                                  1,345,200
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                          1,062,981
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                         208,166
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                      (15,436)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                          371,743
<INCOME-TAX>                                                             150,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                      221,743
<DISCONTINUED>                                                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                                0
<CHANGES>                                                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                                             221,743
<EPS-BASIC>                                                                  .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                                .02


</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR

THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

BONITA J. OWENSBY, )

)

Plaintiff, )

v. ) CASE NO. 2:06-cv-796-WKW

)

J. F. INGRAM STATE TECHNICAL )

COLLEGE, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

ORDER

It is hereby ORDERED that the order entered referring this case to Magistrate Judge

Charles S. Coody (Doc. #7) dated October 10, 2006 is hereby VACATED.

Done this the 17th day of November, 2006.

 /s/ W. Keith Watkins 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00796-WKW-CSC Document 15 Filed 11/17/2006 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA OF

NORTHERN DIVISION

CHRISTOPHER ALLEN PRIDMORE, )

)

Plaintiff, )

v. ) CASE NO. 2:06-cv-778-MEF

)

GWENDOLYN MOSLEY, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

O R D E R

There being no objections filed to the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge

entered on November 20, 2006 (Doc. #13), said Recommendation is hereby adopted and it

is the

ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice.

DONE this the 21st day of December, 2006.

 /s/ Mark E. Fuller 

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00778-MEF-WC Document 14 Filed 12/21/2006 Page 1 of 1
#### § 605.3 Definitions.

In addition to the definitions provided in 2 CFR part 200 as amended by 2 CFR part 910, the following definitions are provided for purposes of this part—

*Basic and applied research* means basic and applied research and that part of development not related to the development of specific systems or products. The primary aim of research is scientific study and experimentation directed toward advancing the state of the art or increasing knowledge or understanding rather than focusing on a specific system or product.

*Educational/Training* means support for education or related activities for an individual or organization that will enhance education levels and skills in particular scientific or technical areas of interest to DOE.

*Principal investigator* means the scientist or other individual designated by the recipient to direct the project.

*Recipient obligation* means the amounts of orders placed, contracts and subawards issued, services received, and similar transactions during a given period that will require payment by the recipient during the same or a future period.

*Related conference* means scientific or technical conferences, symposia, workshops or seminars for the purpose of communicating or exchanging information or views pertinent to SC.

*Special purpose equipment* means equipment which is used only for research, medical, scientific, educational, or other related project activity.

[57 FR 40583, Sept. 3, 1992, as amended at 79 FR 76046, Dec. 19, 2014]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

The Small Business Administration publishes an interest rate called the optional “peg” rate (13 CFR 120.214) on a quarterly basis. This rate is a weighted average cost of money to the government for maturities similar to the average SBA direct loan. This rate may be used as a base rate for guaranteed fluctuating interest rate SBA loans. This rate will be 3.000 (3) percent for the January-March quarter of FY 2011.

                    Pursuant to 13 CFR 120.921(b), the maximum legal interest rate for any third party lender's commercial loan which funds any portion of the cost of a 504 project (                    *see*13 CFR 120.801) shall be 6% over the New York Prime rate or, if that exceeds the maximum interest rate permitted by the constitution or laws of a given State, the maximum interest rate will be the rate permitted by the constitution or laws of the given State.                

Richard C. Blewett,

Acting Director, Office of Financial Assistance.

[FR Doc. 2010-32311 Filed 12-23-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
**HEHS-00-164R**                      Published: Aug 21, 2000. Publicly Released: Aug 21, 2000.                  

-   
-   
-   
-   

    Jump To:  
-  Elder Abuse 
-  Services for Older Adults 
-  State and Local-Level Drivers and Trends 
-  State and Local Fiscal Projections 
-  Federal Borrowing 
-  Managing the Debt 
-  Summary of Funding Provisions 
-  Auditing the Government's Books 
-  Unpacking the Financial Report 
-  Highlights 
-  Recommendations 
-  Background 
-  About This Work 
-  About This Work 
-  Trends 
-  About the Center 
-  Why It's High Risk 
-  What Remains To Be Done 
-  Key Reports 
-  Newest COVID-Related Reports 
-  AI Use Cases 
-  Flood Insurance 
-  Past Pandemic-Related Reports 
-  CARES Act Oversight Reports 
-  All COVID-19 Reports 
-  Report Suspected Fraud 
-  Subjects 
-  How to Get Notified 
-  Past Reports 
-  Public Health Threats 
-  Explore the FY 2022 and 2023 Funds 
-  Status of FY22 Projects 
-  Lessons Learned 
-  Agency Reports 
-  Recent Reports 
-  Recommendations 
-  Supplemental Material 
-  Full Report 
-  Additional Data 
-  View Decision 
-  Downloads 
-  Previously Identified Actions 
-  Related Pages 
-  Associated Agencies 
-  Tough Choices and Opportunities Ahead 
-  Americas Fiscal Future Key Areas 
-  Retirement Security Key Areas 
-  Current List 
-  About The High Risk List 
-  Area Ratings 
-  Previous High Risk Products 
-  Search Federal Vacancies 
-  Past Federal Vacancies 
-  Violation Letters 
-  About the Yellow Book 
-  Advisory Council 
-  Related Resources 
-  Comment Letters 
-  Related Publications 
-  Contacts and Resources 
-  Major Issues Facing the Nation 
-  Meeting Strategic Challenges 
-  Additional Resources 
-  Resources 
-  GAO Contacts 
-  Mission Teams 
-  Operations and Staff Offices  
-  Organization Chart  
-  Why a Career at GAO? 
-  Am I Qualified? 
-  Company Culture 
-  Reasonable Accommodations 
-  Video Gallery 
-  Paid Internships 
-  Student Volunteers 
-  Professional Development Program 
-  Advancement 
-  Executive Candidate Program 
-  Summer Associates 
-  Externships 
-  Benefits 
-  Contacts 

Skip to Highlights

## Highlights

Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO reviewed the Department of Veterans Affairs' (VA) needs assessment of nursing home care in Detroit, Michigan.

## Full Report

Full Report (16 pages)

## Office of Public Affairs

### Media Inquiries

Sarah Kaczmarek
kaczmareks@gao.gov

(202) 512-4800

### Public Inquiries

Public Affairs
PublicAffairs@gao.gov

(202) 512-4800

## Topics

Health Care

Hospital bed countMedicaidNursing homesProjectionsVeteransVeterans hospitalsNeeds assessmentHealth careVeterans affairsLong-term care
Order entered March 25, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-12-01519-CR

DERRICK BRYAN ALLEN, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 380th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 380-82591-2011

ORDER

The Court ORDERS the trial court to make findings of fact regarding whether appellant 

has been deprived of the reporter’s record because of ineffective counsel, indigence, or for any 

other reason.

• The trial court shall first determine whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal. If 

the trial court determines that appellant does not desire to prosecute this appeal, it shall 

make a finding to that effect.

• If the trial court determines that appellant desires to prosecute the appeal, it shall next 

determine whether appellant is indigent and entitled to proceed without payment of costs 

for the reporter’s record. If appellant is entitled to proceed without payment of costs, the 

trial court shall make a finding to that effect. Moreover, if appellant is indigent, the trial 

court is ORDERED to take such measures as may be necessary to assure effective 

representation, which may include appointment of new counsel. If the trial court finds 

appellant is not indigent, it shall determine whether retained counsel has abandoned the 

appeal.
• The trial court shall next determine: (1) the name and address of each court reporter who 

recorded the proceedings in this cause; (2) the court reporter’s explanation for the delay 

in filing the reporter’s record; and (3) the earliest date by which the reporter’s record can 

be filed. 

We ORDER the trial court to transmit a supplemental record, containing the written 

findings of fact, any supporting documentation, and any orders, to this Court within THIRTY 

DAYS of the date of this order.

The appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with this order. It shall be 

reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the supplemental record is received, 

whichever is earlier.

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT

CHIEF JUSTICE
Exhibit 32.2



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report of The Topps Company,
Inc. (the  "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended August 28, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, Catherine K. Jessup, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.







                                                s/ Catherine K. Jessup
                                                ----------------------
                                                   Catherine K. Jessup
                                              Vice President-Chief Financial
                                                  Officer and Treasurer


October 15, 2004
#### D. H. Blair & Company, Appellant, v. Electro-Learner Corporation, Respondent.

Order entered October 28, 1969, unanimously affirmed, without costs and without disbursements and without prejudice to a new application for the same relief after pleadings which are directed to be served. Concur — Capozzoli, J. P., McGivern, Nunez and Steuer, JJ.
#### DICKINSON, Respondent, v. TYSEN, Appellant, et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

December 31, 1914.)

Action by John J. Dickinson against David J. Ty-sen, impleaded with others. G. M. Pinney, of New York City, for appellant. L. J. Vorhaus, of New York City, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment and order reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event, unless plaintiff stipulates to reduce verdict to an amount equivalent to a commission of 2% per cent., in which event the judgment, as so modified, and the order appealed from, are affirmed, without costs. Settle order on notice. See, also, 154 App. Div. 896, 138 N. Y. Supp. 1114.

LAUGHLIN and DOWLING, JJ., dissent, and vote to affirm.