alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 546 

Condemning in the strongest terms the terrorist attacks that occurred on 

November 9, 2005, in Amman, Jordan. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 10, 2005 

Ms. ROS-LEHTINEN (for herself, Mr. ACKERMAN, Mr. LANTOS, Mr. CHABOT, 

Mr. BERMAN, Mr. PENCE, Mr. ENGEL, Mr. BURTON of Indiana, Mr. 

MCCOTTER, Mr. ISSA, Mr. PITTS, Ms. WATSON, Mr. WEXLER, Mr. WILSON of South Carolina, Mr. TANCREDO, Mr. POE, Mr. SHAYS, Mr. CROWLEY, Mr. LINCOLN DIAZ-BALART of Florida, Mr. BARRETT of South 

Carolina, Mr. SCHIFF, Mr. MEEKS of New York, Ms. BERKLEY, Mr. 

MACK, Mr. BOOZMAN, Ms. HARRIS, Mr. HASTINGS of Florida, Mrs. JO

ANN DAVIS of Virginia, Mr. CHANDLER, Mr. SHERMAN, Mr. KIRK, Mr. 

MCCAUL of Texas, Mr. ROYCE, Mr. FORTENBERRY, Mr. TANNER, Mr. 

KING of New York, and Mr. MARIO DIAZ-BALART of Florida) submitted 

the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on International Relations 

RESOLUTION 

Condemning in the strongest terms the terrorist attacks that 

occurred on November 9, 2005, in Amman, Jordan. 

Whereas on November 9, 2005, a series of terrorist bombs 

exploded at the Radisson, Hyatt, and Days Inn hotels in 

Amman, Jordan, resulting in the deaths of scores of civilians and the injuries of hundreds of others; 
2 

•HRES 546 IH 

Whereas the people and Government of the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan have been targeted in several terrorist attacks over the past few years; 

Whereas Jordan has arrested suspected terrorists with possible ties to Osama bin Laden’s Al Qaeda organization, 

including suspected killers of a United States diplomat, 

Lawrence Foley, who headed the United States Agency 

for International Development (USAID) mission in Jordan but was shot on October 28, 2002, while leaving for 

work, marking the first lethal attack on a United States 

official in Jordan in more than 30 years; and 

Whereas Jordan is a stalwart ally of the United States in the 

global war on terrorism: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) condemns in the strongest terms the ter3 rorist attacks that occurred on November 9, 2005, 

4 in Amman, Jordan; 

5 (2) expresses its condolences to the families and 

6 friends of those individuals who were killed in the 

7 attacks and expresses its sympathies to those indi8 viduals who have been injured; 

9 (3) expresses solidarity and support of the peo10 ple and Government of the United States with the 

11 people and Government of the Hashemite Kingdom 

12 of Jordan as they recover from these cowardly and 

13 inhuman attacks; and 

14 (4) expresses its readiness to support and assist 

15 the Jordanian authorities in their efforts to bring to 
3 

•HRES 546 IH 

1 justice those individuals responsible for the recent 

2 attacks in Jordan and to pursue, disrupt, under3 mine, and dismantle the networks which plan and 

4 carry out such attacks. 

Æ
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE
F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Julius Tabe, M.D. v. Texas Inpatient Consultants, LLP

Appellate case number: 01

- 22

- 00 294

- CV

Trial court case number: 2014

- 73381

Trial court: 129th District Court of Harris County

On November 4, 2022, appellee, Texas Inpatient Consultants, LLP filed a letter with the Court “requesting that the Court supplement the [c]lerk[‘]s [r]ecord with the documents appended to [appellee’s] brief” pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 34.5(c), titled “supplementation.” See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 34.5(c). We construe appellee’s letter as a

letter motion requesting that this Court “supplement” the clerk’s record.

This Court is not responsible for the preparation or supplementation of the clerk’s record for an appeal. The responsibility for preparing, or supplementing, the clerk’s record

lies with the trial court clerk. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 35.3 (“ The trial court clerk is responsible for preparing, certifying and timely filing the clerk’s record.”). Further, in the event a party, or this Court, believes “a relevant item has been omitted from the clerk’s record,” that party “may by letter ” request t hat the “trial court clerk to prepare, certify, and file in the appellate court a supplement containing” any such omitted item. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 34.5(c).

Accordingly, appellee’s letter mot ion for this Court to supplement the clerk’s record

is denied

. Nothing in this order prec lud es any party, including appellee, from requesting that the trial court clerk supplement the clerk’s record in accordance with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature:

___ /s/ Ampar o Guerra

__________

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: __ November 22, 2022

______
Summary	of	Interagency	Working	Comments	on	Draft	Language	under									

E.O.	13563	and	12866	Interagency	Review.		Subject	to	Further	Policy	Review.

Comments on U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Draft Final Rule, “Control of Air Pollution from 

Motor Vehicles: Tier 3 Motor Vehicle Emission and Fuel Standards,” RIN 2060-AQ86

Section IV.F.5.a – Paragraph # 6 with suggested edits highlighted in yellow:

“In response to the concerns expressed by the manufacturers, EPA has identified five interim changes to 

existing regulations to both clarify testing requirements and to provide the manufacturers a reasonable 

opportunity to continue to test for CAFE, GHG, and labeling purposes on Tier 2 test fuels for each EDV 

and FEDV until such time as EPA determines appropriate adjustments, if any, related to a change to Tier 

3 test fuels. EPA believes these changes can be implemented without impacting the integrity of the 

testing conducted for the criteria pollutant, CAFE, and GHG standards as well as values generated for 

determination of fuel economy labels. It is very important to note that the emission test data generated 

by these early Tier 3/LEVIII vehicles covering both Tier 2 and Tier 3 test fuel will provide data needed to 

assess the “R” value and the impact of the fuel change on the stringency of the CAFE and GHG 

standards, and the calculations for the fuel economy labeling program. This data will be instrumental in 

developing any appropriate adjustments to maintain equivalent stringency for the CAFE and GHG 

standards and to update the fuel economy labeling calculations, as needed. At the present time, EPA 

currently expects to have the needed data in early to mid 2015 such that EPA and NHTSA will then be in 

a position to conduct a thorough assessment of the impacts of different emission test fuels on Tier 

3/LEV III vehicles and to jointly develop any appropriate adjustments and changes.”
Editorial Note on Part 55
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 55 appear at 80 FR 74980, Dec. 1, 2015.

§ 55.55 Expiration. ( a ) Each operator license and senior operator license expires six years after the date of issuance, upon termination of employment with the facility licensee, or upon determination by the facility licensee that the licensed individual no longer needs to maintain a license.
( b ) If a licensee files an application for renewal or an upgrade of an existing license on Form NRC-398 at least 30 days before the expiration of the existing license, it does not expire until disposition of the application for renewal or for an upgraded license has been finally determined by the Commission. Filing by mail will be deemed to be complete at the time the application is deposited in the mail.
[52 FR 9460, Mar. 25, 1987, as amended at 79 FR 66605, Nov. 10, 2014]
# Subpart 1917.1 - Multiyear Contracting

**Parent topic:**PART 1917 - SPECIAL CONTRACTING METHODS

## 1917.102 Policy.

When consistent with 22 U.S.C. 1472(b), the Head of the Board may approve multiyear contracts up to five years.
EX-33.2
REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE

CoreLogic Commercial Real Estate Services, Inc. (the "Asserting Party"), an
indirect subsidiary of CoreLogic, Inc, is responsible for assessing compliance
as of December 31, 2013, and for the period from January 1, 2013 through
December 31, 2013 (the "Reporting Period") with the servicing criteria set forth
in Title 17, Sections 229.1122(d)(1)(iv), (d)(2)(v), (d)(2)(vi), (d)(2)(vii),
(d)(4)(xi), (d)(4)(xii) and (d)(4)(xiii) of the Code of Federal Regulations
applicable to the Asserting Party (the "Applicable Servicing Criteria"). The
servicing activities covered by this report include all loans for commercial
mortgage loan outsourcing customers for which the Asserting Party served as the
commercial tax service provider (the "Platform").

The Asserting Party has assessed its compliance with the Applicable Servicing
Criteria for the Reporting Period and has concluded that the Asserting Party has
complied, in all material respects, with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of
December 31, 2013, and for the Reporting Period with respect to the Platform
taken as a whole.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm,
has issued an attestation report on the assessment of compliance with the
Applicable Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2013, and for the Reporting
Period.

CORELOGIC COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE SERVICES, INC.


/s/ Vicki Chenault
Vicki Chenault,
Senior Vice President
February 14, 2014


Page 1 of 1
# L_2023227EN.01001501.xml

| 14.9.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 227/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.9.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 227/15

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE No 154/2020

of 23 October 2020

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement [2023/1729]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (“the EEA Agreement”), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2020/27 of 13 January 2020 postponing the expiry date of approval of propiconazole for use in biocidal products of product-type 8 (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2020/27 of 13 January 2020 postponing the expiry date of approval of propiconazole for use in biocidal products of product-type 8 (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following point is inserted after point 12zzzzzzj (Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/1973) of Chapter XV of Annex II to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘12zzzzzzk. | 32020 D 0027: Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2020/27 of 13 January 2020 postponing the expiry date of approval of propiconazole for use in biocidal products of product-type 8 (OJ L 8, 14.1.2020, p. 39).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘12zzzzzzk.

32020 D 0027: Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2020/27 of 13 January 2020 postponing the expiry date of approval of propiconazole for use in biocidal products of product-type 8 (OJ L 8, 14.1.2020, p. 39).’

Article 2

The text of Implementing Decision (EU) 2020/27 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 24 October 2020, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 23 October 2020.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Sabine MONAUNI

---

(1)  
  OJ L 8, 14.1.2020, p. 39.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 67 (Friday, April 6, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 20779]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-8369]

========================================================================
Notices
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules 
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings 
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings, 
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency 
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents 
appearing in this section.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 67 / Friday, April 6, 2012 / 
Notices

[[Page 20779]]

ADMINISTRATIVE CONFERENCE OF THE UNITED STATES

Committee on Administration and Management

AGENCY: Administrative Conference of the United States.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of a public meeting of the Committee on 
Administration and Management of the Assembly of the Administrative 
Conference of the United States. The meeting will provide an 
opportunity for the committee to continue its consideration of a draft 
recommendation regarding the Paperwork Reduction Act. Complete details 
regarding the committee meeting, the contours of the project, how to 
attend (including information about remote access and obtaining special 
accommodations for persons with disabilities), and how to submit 
comments to the committee can be found in the ``About'' section of the 
Conference's Web site, at http://www.acus.gov. Click on ``About,'' then 
on ``The Committees,'' and then on ``Committee on Administration and 
Management.''
    Comments may be submitted by email to Comments@acus.gov, with 
``Committee on Administration and Management'' in the subject line, or 
by postal mail to ``Committee on Administration and Management 
Comments'' at the address given below.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at 1120 20th Street NW., Suite 706 
South, Washington, DC 20036.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Emily Schleicher Bremer, Designated 
Federal Officer, Administrative Conference of the United States, 1120 
20th Street NW., Suite 706 South, Washington, DC 20036; Telephone 202-
480-2080.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Committee on Administration and Management

    The Committee on Administration and Management will meet to 
continue its consideration of a draft recommendation on the Paperwork 
Reduction Act and proposed improvements to its implementation.
    Date: Wednesday, May 2, 2012 from 1:30 p.m. to 4:30 p.m.

    Dated: April 3, 2012.
Shawne C. McGibbon,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2012-8369 Filed 4-5-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6110-01-P
```
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-23,032-03

EX PARTE GREGORY GENE MALLORY, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 27519 IN THE 6TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM LAMAR COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant pleaded guilty to assault of a public

servant and was sentenced to three years’ imprisonment. He did not appeal his conviction.

Applicant contends, among other things, that his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance 1

because trial counsel did not adequately communicate with him, did not prepare a defense, and did

not discuss with Applicant the possibility of going to trial on the charges. Applicant alleges that he

This Court has reviewed Applicant’s other claims and finds them to be without merit. 1
2

insisted that he was innocent of the charges and did not have any recollection of the events

underlying the charges, but that trial counsel failed to explore the possibility of a “not guilty” plea,

and only discussed with Applicant the option of entering into a negotiated plea.

Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Strickland v. Washington,

466 U.S. 668 (1984); Ex parte Patterson, 993 S.W.2d 114, 115 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999). In these

circumstances, additional facts are needed. As we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294

(Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court

shall order trial counsel to respond to Applicant’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. The

trial court may use any means set out in TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d).

If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. 

If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an

attorney to represent Applicant at the hearing. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 26.04. 

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether the

performance of Applicant’s trial counsel was deficient and, if so, whether counsel’s deficient

performance prejudiced Applicant. The trial court shall also make any other findings of fact and

conclusions of law that it deems relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant’s claim for

habeas corpus relief.

This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The

issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all

affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or

deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall

be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time must
3

be requested by the trial court and shall be obtained from this Court. 

Filed: June 27, 2018

Do not publish
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order
Lansing, Michigan

April 26, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice 129437 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan In re DEMARCUS DEVON DAVIS, Minor.

________________ _______________ __________/ Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Petitioner-Appellee,

v SC: 129437 COA: 254527 Berrien Juvenile Div Ct: 2003-000923-DJ DEMARCUS DEVON DAVIS, Respondent-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, th e application for leave to appeal the Ju ly 14, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is cons idered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

C AVANAGH , K ELLY , and M ARKMAN , JJ., would grant leave to appeal.

p0419 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

April 26, 2006

Clerk
- IMPACT OF THE NORTH AMERICAN FREE TRADE AGREEMENT ON THE U.S. ECONOMY AND 	INDUSTRIES: A THREE YEAR REVIEW  	Investigation 332-381: Includes an analysis of NAFTA's effects on sectoral trade, 	employment, and productivity, as well as the aggregate effects on the U.S. economy.  	(Publication 3045;  July 1997)	 Download:	 Part 1 in **WordPerfect 6.1** format (513,868 bytes)Download:	 Part 2 in **WordPerfect 6.1** format (1,000,701 bytes)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-27-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-29-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-29-1999
<CASH>                                          77,511
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   69,048
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    358,520
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               531,723
<PP&E>                                         841,862
<DEPRECIATION>                                 357,716
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,076,974
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          323,292
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        19,649
<OTHER-SE>                                     645,123
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,076,974
<SALES>                                      1,753,948
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                        1,292,684
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,700,334
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,825
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 53,614
<INCOME-TAX>                                    20,900
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             32,714
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    32,714
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .84
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .84


</TABLE>
Subpart 803.70 [Reserved]

Parent topic: PART 803 - IMPROPER BUSINESS PRACTICES AND PERSONAL CONFLICTS OF

INTEREST