alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 537 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 3838) to establish the Independent Commission to Prevent Fraud and Abuse in the Response to 

Hurricane Katrina, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 7, 2005 

Mr. WAXMAN submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Rules 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 3838) to establish the Independent Commission to Prevent Fraud and 

Abuse in the Response to Hurricane Katrina, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Resolved, That immediately upon the adoption of this 

2 resolution the House shall without intervention of any 

3 point of order consider in the House the bill (H.R. 3838) 

4 to establish the Independent Commission to Prevent 

5 Fraud and Abuse in the Response to Hurricane Katrina, 

6 and for other purposes. The bill shall be considered as 

7 read. The previous question shall be considered as ordered 

8 on the bill to final passage without intervening motion ex-
2 

•HRES 537 IH 

1 cept: (1) one hour of debate on the bill equally divided 

2 and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority 

3 member of the Committee on Government Reform; and (2) 

4 one motion to recommit. 

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 652 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 652

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that there should 
  be established a National Inflammatory Skin Disease Awareness Month.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 31, 2006

Mrs. Jo Ann Davis of Virginia submitted the following resolution; which 
           was referred to the Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that there should 
  be established a National Inflammatory Skin Disease Awareness Month.

Whereas inflammatory skin diseases affect men, women, and children of all ages 
        and races;
Whereas these diseases can be very distressing to those who have them, causing 
        great discomfort and emotional stress;
Whereas inflammatory skin diseases include a wide range of symptoms and a broad 
        category of skin conditions, including eczema, acne, poison ivy, contact 
        dermatitis, and psoriasis, among others;
Whereas inflammatory skin disease affects citizens across the United States;
Whereas it is essential to educate the public on the symptoms, treatments, and 
        cures related to inflammatory skin diseases; and
Whereas December would be an appropriate month to establish as National 
        Inflammatory Skin Disease Awareness Month: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives that 
there should be established a National Inflammatory Skin Disease 
Awareness Month.
                                 <all>
```
H. Res. 392

In the House of Representatives, U.S., 

July 28, 2005.

Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall 

be in order to consider the conference report to accompany 

the bill (H.R. 2361) making appropriations for the Department of the Interior, environment, and related agencies for 

the fiscal year ending September 30, 2006, and for other purposes. All points of order against the conference report and 

against its consideration are waived. The conference report 

shall be considered as read. 

Attest:

Clerk.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-7288

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JIMMY WAYNE MARTIN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle

District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr.,

District Judge. (CR-91-239; CA-94-582-2)

Submitted: January 23, 1996 Decided: May 20, 1996

Before WILKINSON, Chief Judge, WIDENER, Circuit Judge, and

PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jimmy Wayne Martin, Appellant Pro Se. Paul Alexander Weinman,

Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his

28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the

district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the

magistrate judge and find no reversible error. We affirm

substantially on the reasoning of the district court. United States

v. Martin, Nos. CR-91-239; CA-94-582-2 (M.D.N.C. July 31, 1995).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATIONS

Pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350



The undersigned hereby certifies that
(i) the foregoing quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A filed by Fountain Powerboat Industries, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended September 30, 2004, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in that Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       |  |                                      
|---------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: October 12, 2005 |  | /s/ Reginald M. Fountain, Jr.        
|                       |  | Reginald M. Fountain, Jr.            
|                       |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|                       | 
|Date: October 12, 2005 |  | /s/ Irving L. Smith                  
|                       |  | Irving L. Smith                      
|                       |  | Chief Financial Officer
###### Editorial Note on Part 725

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 725 appear at 88 FR 41292, June 26, 2023.

#### § 725.28 Action on application to renew or amend.

In considering an application by a permittee to review or amend his permit, the Director, Office of Environment, Health, Safety and Security will apply the criteria set forth in § 725.15. Failure of an applicant to reply to an DOE request for additional information concerning an application for renewal or amendment within 60 days shall result in a rejection of the application without prejudice to resubmit a properly completed application at a later date.

[41 FR 56778, Dec. 30, 1976, as amended at 71 FR 68732, Nov. 28, 2006; 88 FR 41292, June 26, 2023]
#### Moshe Reichberg et al., Respondents, v Hirsch Lemel et al., Appellants.

[814 NYS2d 712]

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Douglass, J.), dated May 18, 2005, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed.

The plaintiffs allegedly sustained personal injuries and property damage as a result of a fire in the defendants’ building, where they rented an apartment. The fire department determined that the fire originated in the basement apartment and *665was caused by contact between combustible bedding and a halogen lamp. The basement apartment tenants, who owned the lamp, are not parties to this action.

An out-of-possession landlord is not liable for injuries that occur on the premises after the transfer of possession and control to a tenant unless the landlord (1) is contractually obligated to repair the premises or (2) has reserved the right to enter the premises to make repairs, and liability is based on a significant structural or design defect that violates a specific statutory safety provision *(see Sangiorgio v Ace Towing & Recovery,*13 AD3d 433, 433-434 [2004]; *Richardson v Yasuda Bank & Trust Co. (USA),*5 AD3d 458, 459 [2004]; *Nunez v Alfred Bleyer & Co.,*304 AD2d 734 [2003]; *Angwin v SRF Partnership,*285 AD2d 570, 571 [2001]). Here, since the cause of the fire did not involve the structure of the building, the Supreme Court should have granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint *(see Brockington v Brookfield Dev. Corp.,*20 AD3d 382 [2005]; *Seney v Kee Assoc.,*15 AD3d 383 [2005]; *Sangiorgio v Ace Towing & Recovery, supra; Nunez v Alfred Bleyer & Co., supra; Hausmann v UMK, Inc.,*296 AD2d 336 [2002]; *Angwin v SRF Partnership, supra).*Schmidt, J.P., Crane, Spolzino and Covello, JJ., concur.
§ 708.15 Time to file a complaint. ( a ) A complaint must be filed by the 90th day after the date the employee knew, or reasonably should have known, of the alleged retaliation.
( b ) The period for filing a complaint does not include time spent attempting to resolve the dispute through an internal company grievance-arbitration procedure. The time period for filing stops running on the day the internal grievance is filed and begins to run again on the earlier of: ( 1 ) The day after such dispute resolution efforts end; or
( 2 ) 150 days after the internal grievance was filed if a final decision on the grievance has not been issued.
( c ) The period for filing a complaint does not include time spent resolving jurisdictional issues related to a complaint the employee files under State or other applicable law. The time period for filing stops running on the date the complaint under State or other applicable law is filed and begins to run again the day after a final decision on the jurisdictional issues is issued.
( d ) If the complaint is not filed during the 90-day period, the Head of Field Element or EC Director (as applicable) will give the complainant an opportunity to show any good reason he may have for not filing within that period, and that official may, in his discretion, accept the complaint for processing.
D:\netsite-docs\lps5130\97_ufds_quest.pdf
D:\netsite-docs\lps5130\98_ufds_quest.pdf
D:\netsite-docs\lps5130\99_ufds_quest.pdf
EXHIBIT 31.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Craig A. Hewitt, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of AccuPoll Holding
Corp.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions);

(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.


March 14, 2005                                  /s/ Craig A.Hewitt
                                                --------------------------------
                                                    Craig A. Hewitt
                                                    Chief Financial Officer
----

|  | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | /s/ Amir London                                         Amir London Chief Executive Officer |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | /s/ Gil Efron                                        Gil Efron Deputy Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
#### In the Matter of Therese D. Siller, Appellant, v. William D. Meisser et al., Constituting the Board of Elections of the County of Nassau, et al., Respondents.

In a proceeding to validate petitions designating appellant as a candidate in the Republican Party Primary Elections to be held on June 23, 1970 for nomination for the public office of State Senator for the 4th Senatorial District, Nassau County, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated June 11, 1970, which denied the application. Judgment affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Rabin, Acting P. J., Munder, Martuscello, Latham and Benjamin, JJ., concur.
BOARD RESOLUTION

REQUESTING (select one of the following) MUNICIPAL (or) MUNICIPAL CAPPED RATE LOAN

	WHEREAS,  It has been determined on the basis of the current Construction Work Plan that financing is needed for electric facilities as shown on Rural Utilities Service (RUS) Form 740c, Cost Estimates and Loan Budget for Electric Borrowers, as follows:

	New Financing Requested			$	

	RUS (select one) Municipal Rate (or) Municipal Capped Rate Loan Requested

		(  %)		$	

	Supplemental Loan Requested	(  %)		$	

	THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED, that (Insert name and address of Applicant) make application to the RUS for a (select one) municipal rate (or) municipal capped rate loan in the approximate amount of $		, to be used in accordance with the provisions of 7 CFR Part 1710 and 7 CFR Part 1714 to finance a portion of the above mentioned facilities; and that an application be made to (Insert name and address of supplemental lender) for a loan in the approximate amount of $	, under terms and conditions satisfactory to the Administrator, to provide the balance of financing needed in connection with the above mentioned facilities.

	BE IT ALSO RESOLVED, that the (Insert name of applicant) hereby authorizes the RUS to release appropriate information and data relating to this application to the supplemental lender to facilitate the processing of the RUS and supplemental loans.

	BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the RUS and supplemental loans shall bear the same maturity date to cover a period of (Insert number of years) years and shall provide for repayment of the loans (choose one of the following) (a) in periodic installments which provide for interest and level amortization of principal over the term of the loan (level principal method). or (b) in periodic installments, including interest and principal payments, which are equal in amount to every other such periodic installment (level payment method).

	BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the RUS note shall be in the full amount of the RUS loan, provide for repayment of principal to begin two years from the date thereof, and (choose one of the following) (a) include a prepayment option that will allow (Insert name of applicant) to prepay all, or a portion of, the RUS loan on a date other than a maturity date. or (b) omits the prepayment option.

CERTIFICATION OF SECRETARY

I, 			, Secretary of 				 do hereby certify that the above is a true and correct excerpt from the minutes of the meeting of the board of directors of the 					, held on the 		 day of 		, 19  , at which meeting a quorum was present.

	SEAL		

		Signature
§ 60.134 Design of seals for shafts and boreholes. ( a ) *General design criterion.* Seals for shafts and boreholes shall be designed so that following permanent closure they do not become pathways that compromise the geologic repository's ability to meet the performance objectives or the period following permanent closure.
( b ) *Selection of materials and placement methods.* Materials and placement methods for seals shall be selected to reduce, to the extent practicable: ( 1 ) The potential for creating a preferential pathway for groundwater to contact the waste packages or
( 2 ) For radionuclide migration through existing pathways.
[48 FR 28222, June 21, 1983, as amended at 50 FR 29648, July 22, 1985]
2928.305 Overseas workers' compensation and war hazard insurance.       The authority of the Agency Head to recommend to the Secretary of Labor waiver of the applicability of the Defense Base Act (42 U.S.C. 1651, *et seq.*) to any contract, subcontract, work location, or classification of employees, is delegated to the HCA.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 2928.3 - Insurance
PGI 232.604 Demand for payment.       (1) For contract debts resulting from other than a termination for default, the office that first determines an amount due, whether it be the contract administration office, the contracting office, the disbursing office, or the selling office/agency, shall—          (i) Make a demand for payment; and          (ii) Provide a copy of the demand to the payment office cited in the contract.          (2) For contract debts resulting from a termination for default, the contracting officer shall make the demand and direct the debtor to make such payment to the designated office.    **Parent topic:** PGI 232.6 -CONTRACT DEBTS
Exhibit 35.2



LOGO

Feb 28, 2018

Servicer
Compliance Statement

For SEMT 2013-2 (see Schedule A)

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of First Republic Bank (the Servicer), does hereby certify that:



| | (i) | a review of the Servicers activities during the reporting period from January 1, 2017 through December 31, 2017 and of its performance under the Agreement (as defined on Schedule A attached hereto) from
the above referenced trust during such period has been made under such officers supervision, and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | to the best of such officers knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under this Agreement in all material respects throughout such reporting period.
| | ---- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



First Republic BankBy:

/s/ Ron TremblayName:

Ron TremblayTitle:

Vice President of Residential LendingDate:

Feb. 28, 2018


San Francisco  Palo Alto  Los Angeles  Santa Barbara  Newport Beach  San Diego 
Portland  Palm Beach  Boston  Greenwich  New York





111 PINE STREET, SAN FRANCISCO,
CALIFORNIA 94111, TEL (415) 392-1400 OR (800) 392-1400, FAX (415) 392-1413 WWW.FIRSTREPUBLIC.COM  MEMBER FDIC AND


LOGO
 EQUAL HOUSING LENDER



---

LOGO

<for SEMT 2013-2>

SCHEDULE A



| | 1. | Flow Mortgage Loan Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of July 1, 2010, between Redwood Residential Acquisition Corporation and First Republic Bank, as modified by the Reconstitution Agreement dated January 30,
2013 (the Agreement).
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

San Francisco  Palo Alto  Los Angeles  Santa Barbara  Newport Beach 
San Diego  Portland  Palm Beach  Boston  Greenwich  New York





111 PINE STREET, SAN FRANCISCO,
CALIFORNIA 94111, TEL (415) 392-1400 OR (800) 392-1400, FAX (415) 392-1413 WWW.FIRSTREPUBLIC.COM  MEMBER FDIC AND


LOGO
 EQUAL HOUSING LENDER