alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 4.1 - Sample Stock Cert.



Exhibit 4.1


KINGLAKE RESOURCES INC.

INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA 

AUTHORIZED SHARES $0.00001 PAR VALUE



	
NUMBER 
	
SHARES

CUSIP 

See Reverse

For Certain Definitions




THIS CERTIFIES THAT


Is The Owner of


FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE SHARES OF $0.00001 PAR VALUE COMMON STOCK OF


KINGLAKE RESOURCES INC.


Transferable on the books of the Corporation in person or by duly authorized attorney upon surrender of this Certificate properly endorsed.  This Certificate is not valid unless countersigned by the Transfer Agent and registered by the Registrar. 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said Company has caused this Certificate to be executed by the facsimile signatures of its duly authorized officers and to be sealed with the facsimile seal of the Company.


	
Dated:

	
 

	
_______________________
	

 
	
_________________________

	

Secretary
	

SEAL
	

President





 

 

 

 

 

 





KINGLAKE RESOURCES INC.

               

TRANSFER FEE: $20.00 PER NEW CERTIFICATE ISSUED


The following abbreviations when used in the inscription on the face of this certificate, shall be construed as though they were written out in full according to applicable law or regulations:


TEN COM - as tenants in common

TEN ENT - as tenants by the entireties

JT TEN - as joint tenants with right of survivorship and not as tenants in common

UNIF GIFT MIN ACT - __________ Custodian ___________ (Minor) under Uniform Gifts to Minors

Act ____________ (State)


Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list.


For Value Received, _________________ hereby sell, assign and transfer unto _______________ (Please

insert Social Security or other identifying number of Assignee). 

_________________________________________________________________

(Please print or typewrite name and address, including zip code of Assignee)

_________________________________________________________________

_________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________ Shares of the Common Stock

represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint

_______________________ attorney-in-fact to transfer the said stock on the books of the within-named

Corporation, with full power of substitution in the premises.


Dated: _________________


 
_____________________________________________

Notice: The signatures to this Assignment must correspond with the name(s) as written upon the face of the certificate in every particular, without alteration or enlargement or any change whatsoever.










Signature(s) Guaranteed:


___________________________

The signature(s) must be guaranteed by an eligible guarantor institution (Banks, Stockbrokers, Savings

and Loan Associations and Credit Unions with membership in an approved signature guarantee Medallion

Program), pursuant to S.E.C. Rule 17Ad-15.


 

 

 

 

 - 2 -
#### Jamaica Buses, Inc., Respondent, v Frank Connor et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

In an action to recover for property damage resulting from a vehicular collision, defendants Frank Connor and Connor Trucking, Inc., appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated February 26, 1980, which denied their motion to dismiss the action for plaintiff’s failure to serve a timely complaint. Order reversed, on the law, with $50 costs and disbursements, appellants’ motion granted and action dismissed. Plaintiff has failed to satisfy its burden of showing that the delay in the prosecution of its action is excusable and that its claim is meritorious (see *Barasch v Micucci,*49 NY2d 594). Furthermore, the acceptance of plaintiff’s complaint when served in accordance with the order herein appealed from did not constitute a waiver of appellants’ right to appeal from such order (see *Warren v Baker,*57 AD2d 709, 710). Hopkins, J. P., Mangano and O’Connor, JJ., concur; Weinstein, J., dissents and votes to affirm the order.
#### § 601.405 Penalty procedures.

Agencies shall impose and collect civil penalties pursuant to the provisions of the Program Fraud and Civil Remedies Act, 31 U.S.C. 3803 (except subsection (c)), 3804, 3805, 3806, 3807, 3808, and 3812, insofar as these provisions are not inconsistent with the requirements herein.
EXH101



Exhibit 10.1

VIA COURRIER

July 18, 2006

Battle Mountain Gold Company

1700 Lincoln Street, Suite 2800

Denver, CO  80203

Attn:  Legal Department

     Re:          Notice of Option Exercise

Dear Sir or Madam:

Pursuant to Section 3.a. of the Agreement dated effective the 23rd day of July, 2001, between CROWN RESOURCES CORPORATION, a Washington corporation ("Crown Resources"), CROWN RESOURCE CORP. OF COLORADO, a Colorado corporation ("Crown Colorado"), GOLD TEXAS RESOURCES U.S., INC., a Texas corporation ("Gold Texas") (collectively "Crown"), and BATTLE MOUNTAIN GOLD COMPANY, a Nevada corporation ("Battle Mountain"),  Crown conveyed a royalty by deed to Battle Mountain (the "Royalty"), which was recorded in Auditor's File No. 3037050 in the records of Okanogan County, Washington.

Under Section 3.b. of that Agreement, Crown has the option, for five years from July 23, 2001, to purchase the Royalty from Battle Mountain for the sum of $2,000,000.00 cash.

Crown Resources, as the 100% owner of Crown Colorado and Gold Texas, will be taking the entire reconveyance on behalf of Crown, in accordance with Exhibit 6 of the Agreement which names Crown Resources as the Grantee.

By this letter, Crown exercises the option to purchase the Royalty.  We are prepared to wire transfer to your account the $2,000,000.00 purchase price for the Royalty as soon as you provide wiring instructions to us.  Upon your receipt of the purchase price, you are to deliver to the above address a fully executed and acknowledged original of the Royalty Reconveyance Deed enclosed with this letter.

If you have any questions concerning this notice of option exercise, please contact me immediately at the above address.

Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter.

Very truly yours,



/s/ Chris Herald

President, Crown Resources Corporation
#### PEOPLE, Respondent, v. J. ALBERT & SON, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

January 15, 1915.)

Proceeding by the People of the State of New York against J. Albert & Son.

No opinion. Judgment of conviction of the Court of Special Sessions affirmed on reargument. See, also, 150 N. Y. Supp. 1102.
✄

✄

Cut along the pink area, fold along black line >

< Cut along the pink area, fold along black line

To Inspire

the next 

generatio

of explore

... as only

NASA can

http://education.nasa.gov

NASA’s Education Home Page

serves as the education portal

for information regarding

educational programs and

services offered by NASA for

the American educational

community. This high-level

directory of information provides specific details and

points of contact for all of

NASA’s educational efforts,

Field Center offices, and

points of presence within

each State.

NASA Education 

Home Page

To inspire the 

next generation 

of explorers

. . . as only 

NASA can

ET-2002-06-009-HQ

National Aeronautics and 

Space Administration

NASA Spacelink is one of

NASA’s electronic resources

specifically developed for the

educational community. 

NASA Educational Products

can be accessed at:

http://spacelink.nasa.gov/

products

Spacelink is also host to the

NASA TV Education file 

schedule at:

http://spacelink.nasa.gov/

education.file

For information about multimedia products available for a

minimal charge, visit the

Central Operations of

Resources for Educators

(CORE) Web site at:

http://core.nasa.gov

Join the NASA Spacelink

EXPRESS mailing list to receive

announcements of new NASA

materials and opportunities for

educators at:

http://spacelink.nasa.gov/

express

http://spacelink.nasa.gov
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 514 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 514

         Supporting the observance of a Month of Global Health.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 26, 2005

      Ms. McCollum of Minnesota (for herself, Mr. Gilchrest, Mrs. 
  Christensen, Mr. Snyder, and Mr. Schwarz of Michigan) submitted the 
     following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 
                        International Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
         Supporting the observance of a Month of Global Health.

Whereas child survival is a key element of global health and is of utmost 
        importance to the United States and all countries of the world;
Whereas child survival must be addressed on a global scale;
Whereas increasing child survival rates is critical to population growth in 
        countries around the world;
Whereas child survival depends on access to key nutrients that can avert 
        millions of unnecessary deaths in third world countries from preventable 
        diseases;
Whereas 5 simple interventions, if delivered to children before the age of 5, 
        may significantly increase their chances of survival;
Whereas these 5 interventions--vaccines, antibiotics, Vitamin A and 
        micronutrients, oral rehydration therapy, and insecticide-treated 
        bednets--can be provided to third world countries at minimal cost;
Whereas 10,000,000 children die each year from preventable diseases in third 
        world countries, and 6,000,000 of those deaths could be prevented by the 
        use of these interventions; and
Whereas it would be appropriate to observe November 2005 as a Month of Global 
        Health: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) supports the observance of a Month of Global Health;
            (2) reaffirms its commitment to ensuring that children 
        around the world receive the interventions necessary for 
        survival as an integral component of efforts to improve global 
        health; and
            (3) encourages the people of the United States to observe a 
        Month of Global Health with appropriate participation in key 
        activities, programs, and fundraising in support of worldwide 
        child survival.
                                 <all>
```
§ 140.89 Criminal penalties. ( a ) Section 223 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, provides for criminal sanctions for willful violation of, attempted violation of, or conspiracy to violate, any regulation issued under sections 161b, 161i, or 161o of the Act. For purposes of section 223, all the regulations in part 140 are issued under one or more of sections 161b, 161i, or 161o, except for the sections listed in paragraph (b) of this section.
( b ) The regulations in part 140 that are not issued under sections 161b, 161i, or 161o for the purposes of section 223 are as follows: §§ 140.1, 140.2, 140.3, 140.4, 140.5, 140.7, 140.8, 140.9, 140.9a, 140.10, 140.14, 140.16, 140.18, 140.19, 140.20, 140.51, 140.52, 140.71, 140.72, 140.81, 140.82, 140.83, 140.84, 140.85, 140.87, 140.89, 140.91, 140.92, 140.93, 140.94, 140.95, 140.96, 140.107, 140.108, and 140.109.
[57 FR 55080, Nov. 24, 1992]
### SERVED: DECEMBER 17,2014 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

In The Matter Of: JOHN ALAN DAVIS Respondent 

### OFFICE OF HEARINGS WASHINGTON, DC

·. ... f '

**·~** . ' .--;, DocketNo. FAA-2014-0409 ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 2013-GL-13-0038
ORDERDISMISSING PROCEEDING OnNovember 20, 2014, an Order Continuing Rule 16 Litigation Scheduling Conference was filed. Among other things, this Order noted that during the September 30, 2014 telephone conference the parties stated that they had reached a settlement, but needed time to exchange and submitpaperwork On December 16,2014, the FAA submitted, viafax, an untitled document stating thatthe parties have settled the case and requesting "thatthe matter be removed from the docket." The document is attached for filing inthe FAA Hearing Docket. After having reviewed the case file, all pleadings and motions, all relevant caselaw, statutes, regulations, rules, and authority, and being fully advised; IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 

### 1. The Rule 16 Litigation Scheduling Conference, set for December 18,2014, at 10:00 a.m. Easterntime, is cancelled. 2. Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. § 13.215, the FAA has withdrawn its Complaint, and this proceeding is dismissed with prejudice.

Attachments: 1) Service List 2) Untitled DocumentSERVICE LIST- BY U.S. MAIL ORIGINAL & ONE COPY Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000 1

Ms. Kate Barber Complainant's Counsel Federal Aviation Administration, AGL-7 2300 East Devon Avenue Des Plaines, IL 60018-4696 TEL: 847-294-7862 FAX: 847-294-7498 Mr. John Alan Davis Respondent 12052 1161h St. ChippewaFalls, WI 54729 Judge J.E. Sullivan US. Administrative LawJudge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation ONE COPY

1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-6941 FAX: 202-366-7536 DocketNo. FAA-2014-0409 (Civil Penalty Action)

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC--430.12/16/2014 16:14 8472948293 FAA AGL 7 COUNSEL PAGE 02/02

,.

**::;,(;m~TAtiON** 1·,-; ·

# f(f;f.· c;r- 

# ARJ*'s U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARING ;



### Zfil~ 

### DEC \b P \t! 

### 38 In The MatterOf: 

### JOHN ALAN DAVIS Respondent WASHINGTON, DC
. ) ) 

### ) ) ) 

### DocketNo. FAA-2014-0409 

### Case No. 2013·GL"l3-0038

Theparties in

### the above matterhave settledthe above case. We requestthatthe matter be 

### removed from the docket. 

### Respectfully submitted,

Office ofRegional Counsel FederalAviationAdministration GreatLakes

### Region 2300 E. Devon Avenue Des

### Plaines, IL 60018
Editorial Note on Part 712
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 712 appear at 88 FR 41292, June 26, 2023.

§ 712.37 Evaluation for hallucinogen use. If DOE determines that an HRP candidate or HRP-certified individual has used any hallucinogen, the individual is not eligible for certification or recertification unless: ( a ) Five years have passed since the last use of the hallucinogen;
( b ) There is no evidence of any flashback within the last five years from the previous hallucinogen use; and
( c ) The individual has a record of acceptable job performance and observed behavior.
### E P

A PS D P e r m it # C

u rr e n t C o m p a n y N ame ( O l d C o m pan y N a m e) C oun ty 

### D a t e o f I n iti a l P r opo s al P r

o j e c t E qu i p m e n t D e s

c r i p ti on

S J 08

- 01 A v e n a l E n e r g y Pr o j e ct K i n gs J un e 2009 T w o GE 7FA s w

i th H R S G s a nd du c

t bu r n e r s, o n e

s t e a m tu r b i n e
, o n e a u x ili a r y b o il e r
, o n e

e m e r g e n c y s t a ndby g e n e r a t o r e n g i n e
, a nd o n e

e m e r g e n c y s t a ndby f ir e w a t e r pu m p e n g i n e. 

### S JV PS D P e r m it s P r opo s e d b y E P A t h a t are P

e nd i n g F i n a l A g

e nc y A c ti on, a s o f

A u g u s t 30

, 2012
Subpart 2808.4 - Federal Supply Schedules

Parent topic: PART 2808 - REQUIRED SOURCES OF SUPPLIES AND SERVICES

2808.405 Ordering procedures for Federal Supply

Schedules.

2808.405-3 Blanket purchase agreements (BPAs).

The SPE is the agency head for purposes of FAR 8.405-3(a)(3)(ii).
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION 4 ATLANTA FEDERAL CENTER 61 FORSYTH STREET ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303·8960



# f4AN 1 5

# 2015

Mr. David Bernhart Assistant Regional Administrator for Protected Resources National Marine Fisheries Service Southeast Regional Office 263 13thAvenue South St. Petersburg, Florida 33701

Dear Mr. Bernhart:

In a letter dated October 6, 2014, the Environmental Protection Agency transmitted to your office a Biological Assessment (BA) for the designation ofan Ocean Dredged Material Disposal Site (ODMDS), offshore ofJacksonville, Florida. The BA was issued with respect to an Endangered Species Act Section 7 informal consultation for the action to designate an expanded ODMDS for an existing disposal site, in accordance with the Marine Protection, Research and Sanctuaries Act. The BA did not include consideration ofthe critical habitat for the distinct population segment oftheNorthwest Atlantic Ocean Loggerhead SeaTurtle, which was designated on July 10, 2014. Wehaverevised the BAto include the EPA's consideration ofthis recently designated critical habitat (see enclosure). Consistent with ourdetermination provided

on October 6, 2014, the revised BA reflects our determination that the proposed action is not likely to affect any listed species ortheir critical habitat.

Ifyou have any questions regarding the ESA BA, please contact Mr. Chris McArthur at (404) 562-9391 ormcarthur.christopher@epa.gov.

Enclosure Sincerely,

# ~ Thomas McGill, Chief Ocean, Wetlands and Streams Protection Branch Water Protection Division

cc: Patrick Griffin, USACE-SAJ (electronic w/ enclosure) Karla Reece, NMFS (electronic w/enclosure) Debbie Tucker, FDEP (electronic w/enclosure)

Internet Address (URL) • http://www.epa.gov Recycled/Recyclable • Printed**w~h** Vegetable Oil Based Inkson Recycled Paper (Minimum 30% Postconsumer)
§ 708.9 How to file complaints or other documents. ( a ) Under this part, a complaint or other document is considered filed on the date it is mailed, electronically submitted, or personally delivered to the specified official or office.
( b ) A complaint may be withdrawn at any time at the request of the complainant.
( c ) Absent exceptional circumstances, all submissions to the Office of Hearings and Appeals must be filed electronically in accordance with the instructions set forth on the Office of Hearings and Appeals website, found at *https://www.energy.gov/oha/filing-information .* The Office of Hearings and Appeals may grant permission to file via mail or facsimile.
#### In the Matter of Edwin Morales, Appellant, v Evelyn Bruno, Respondent.

[816 NYS2d 536]

In a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the father appeals from an order of the Family Court, Kings County (Elkins, J.), dated April 23, 2005, which, after a fact-finding hearing, denied his petition to modify an order of the same court (Turbow, J.), dated May 17, 2001, inter alia, permitting contact with his children only by mail.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

£‘[T]he determination of visitation is within the sound discretion of the hearing court based upon the best interests of the child *(see Friederwitzer v Friederwitzer,*55 NY2d 89 [1982]; *see also Koppenhoefer v Koppenhoefer,*159 AD2d 113, 116 [1990]), and its determination will not be set aside unless it lacks a substantial basis in the record” *(Matter of Kachelhofer v Wasiak,*10 AD3d 366, 366 [2004]). While it is true that a parent’s incarceration does not, by itself, render visitation inappropriate *(see Matter of Selca v Selca,*267 AD2d 314 [1999]; *Matter of Teixeria v Teixeria,*205 AD2d 545, 546 [1994]; *Matter of Simpson v Finnigan,*202 AD2d 592, 593 [1994]), visitation will be denied where there is substantial evidence that such visitation would be detrimental to the child *(Matter of Trombley v Trombley,*301 AD2d 890, 891 [2003]). Here, although the Family Court incorrectly recited the law on the burden of proof, there is a sound and substantial basis in the record to establish that, under the circumstances, visitation would not be in the children’s best interests at this time *(see Matter of Trombley v Trombley, supra*at 891-892; *Matter of Russo v Russo,*282 AD2d 610 [2001]; *Matter of Teixeria v Teixeria, supra; Matter of Mohammed v Cortland County Dept. of Social Servs.,*186 AD2d 908, 909 [1992]).

The appellant’s contentions regarding hearsay are unpreserved for appellate review, and in any event, the record supports the Family Court’s determination even without the offending statements.

The appellant’s remaining contention is without merit. Adams, J.P., Santucci, Lunn and Dillon, JJ., concur.
ANNUAL STATEMENT
OF COMPLIANCE

of

PNC BANK, NATIONAL
ASSOCIATION

d/b/a MIDLAND
LOAN SERVICES







Pursuant to the requirements of the applicable
Servicing Agreement for the transactions listed on Schedule I hereto, the undersigned, Steven W. Smith, as Executive Vice President
of Midland Loan Services, a division of PNC Bank, National Association, hereby certifies, subject to any limitations listed on
Schedule I hereto, as of the date hereof, solely in his capacity as an officer and not in his individual capacity, as follows:



| | 1. | A review of the Servicer’s activities during the calendar year 2016 (the “Reporting
Period”) and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under the undersigned officer’s supervision; and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 2. | To the best of the undersigned officer’s knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has
fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------









Dated: March 1, 2017



PNC Bank, National Association 
d/b/a Midland
Loan Services









Steven W. Smith

Executive Vice
President















Member of The PNC Financial Services Group

10851 Mastin Boulevard Overland Park, Kansas
66210

800-327-8083

www.pnc.com/midland





Schedule I

UBS Commercial Mortgage Securitization Corp.

|Recipient Role                                                                        | Deal Name                                    | Series Number  | Midland Role               
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------- | -------------- | ---------------------------
|Depositor                                                                             | UBS Commercial Mortgage Securitization Corp. | Series 2012-C3 | Master Servicer            
|Depositor                                                                             | UBS Commercial Mortgage Securitization Corp. | Series 2012-C4 |                            
|Master Servicer of the 1000 Harbor Boulevard loan under the UBS-Barclays 2012-C3 PSA. |                                              |               
|Depositor                                                                             | UBS Commercial Mortgage Securitization Corp. | Series 2013-C5 | Master and Special Servicer
§ 435.1 Purpose and scope. ( a ) This part establishes energy efficiency performance standard for the construction of new Federal low-rise residential buildings as required by section 305(a) of the Energy Conservation and Production Act, as amended (42 U.S.C. 6834(a)).
( b ) This part also establishes a maximum allowable fossil fuel-generated energy consumption standard for new Federal buildings that are low-rise residential buildings and major renovations to Federal buildings that are low-rise residential buildings, for which design for construction began on or after May 1, 2025
( c ) This part also establishes green building certification requirements for new Federal buildings that are low-rise residential buildings and major renovations to Federal buildings that are low-rise residential buildings, for which design for construction began on or after October 14, 2015.
[71 FR 70283, Dec. 4, 2006, as amended at 79 FR 61571, Oct. 14, 2014; 89 FR 35433, May 1, 2024]