alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 429.156 Manufacturer and private labeler liability. ( a ) In accordance with § 429.102, paragraphs (a)(10) and (c), manufacturers and private labelers are prohibited from selling central air conditioners and heat pumps to a routine violator. ( 1 ) To avoid financial penalties, manufacturers and/or private labelers must cease sales to a routine violator within 3 business days from the date of issuance of a Notice of Finding of Routine Violation.
( 2 ) If a Routine Violator files a Notice of Intent to Appeal pursuant to § 429.150, then a manufacturer and/or private labeler may assume the risk of selling central air conditioners to the Routine Violator during the pendency of the appeal.
( 3 ) If the appeal of the Finding of Routine Violator is denied, then the manufacturer and/or private labeler may be fined in accordance with § 429.120, for sale of any units to a routine violator during the pendency of the appeal that do not meet the applicable regional standard.
( b ) If a manufacturer and/or private labeler has knowledge of routine violation, then the manufacturer can be held liable for all sales that occurred after the date the manufacturer had knowledge of the routine violation. However, if the manufacturer and/or private labeler reports its suspicion of a routine violation to DOE within 15 days of receipt of such knowledge, then it will not be liable for product sold to the suspected routine violator prior to reporting the routine violation to DOE.
[81 FR 45403, July 14, 2016]
#### HIGGINS, Respondent, v. HIGGINS Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

July 1, 1914.)

Action by William C. Higgins against Helen E. Higgins.

No opinion. Interlocutory judgment unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Exhibit 33.3b



|              |  |  |  |  |  |                                                                                  
|------------- |  |  |  |  |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|LOGO ASSURANT |  |  |  |  |  | 260 Interstate North Circle, SE Atlanta, GA
30339 T 770.763-4000
www.assurant.com

February 26, 2018

REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH

§1122(d)(2)(vi), §1122(d)(4)(xi) and §1122(d)(4)(xii)

of REGULATION AB SERVICING CRITERIA

FOR THE REPORTING PERIOD

JANUARY 1, 2017 TO DECEMBER 31, 2017

American Security Insurance Company, Standard Guaranty Insurance Company and TrackSure Insurance Agency, Inc. (collectively, the Asserting Party)
is responsible for assessing compliance for the period of January 1, 2017 through December 31, 2017 (the Reporting Period) with the servicing criteria set forth in §1122(d)(2)(vi), §1122(d)(4)(xi) and
§1122(d)(4)(xii) of Title 17, §229.1122(d) of the Code of Federal Regulations, (the Applicable Servicing Criteria) which the Asserting Party has concluded are applicable to the insurance escrow servicing activities it performs
with respect to all mortgage backed securities transactions that were registered after January 1, 2006 with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933 (the Platform Transactions). The Asserting
Party used the criteria set forth in paragraph(d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB to assess the compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.

The Asserting Party has assessed its compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria for the Reporting Period and has concluded that the Asserting Party has
complied, in all material respects, with the Applicable Servicing Criteria for the Reporting Period with respect to the Platform Transaction.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on the assessment of compliance with the
Applicable Servicing Criteria as of and for the Reporting Period.

American Security Insurance Company

Standard Guaranty Insurance Company

TrackSure
Insurance Agency, Inc.



|                                                         
|---------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Garret Hale                                          
|By: Garrett Hale                                         
|Sr. Vice President of American Security Insurance Company
|and Standard Guaranty Insurance Company                  
|                                                         
|Date: 2-26-2018
1

Ogulei, David

From: Damico, Genevieve

Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2015 11:51 AM

To: Czerniak, George; Furey, Eileen; Woolums, Jane; Cohen, Eric; Mooney, John; Ogulei, David; 

Compher, Michael

Subject: Call from Veolia

I just got off the phone with Doug Harris from Veolia. He said that Veolia agrees in principle to 

1. Installing carbon injection on units 2 and 3 

2. An enhanced FAP 

3. Fenceline monitoring 

He has asked for the following before our Feburary 11 meeting: 

1. We speak to IEPA about finding a way for Veolia to install the carbon injection without permitting. I will be 

talk to IEPA soon, at the latest 3:00 this afternoon. 

2. Veolia would like to have detailed conversations about developing a workable enhanced FAP. 

3. Veolia is very concerned with having any sort of business relationship with Cooper Engineering. They are 

willing to put out a bid but it is unlikely that they would consider Cooper Engineering. Michael, can you lend 

us someone with XACT knowledge and experience with the previous work on siting of our XACT monitor 

when we were thinking about that. We would like to consult with this person and have them present at our 

meeting with Veolia on February 11. 

Veolia is envisioning the meeting on February 11 will be in two parts, legal agreement and technical negotiations, so that 

we can agree to the plan and then get to work on the details.
# EUR-Lex - 31977R1496 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31977R1496

**Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1496/77 of 4 July 1977 on communications between Member States and the Commission in the silkworm sector **

*
Official Journal L 167 , 05/07/1977 P. 0008 - 0008 Finnish special edition: Chapter 3 Volume 9 P. 0027 Greek special edition: Chapter 03 Volume 18 P. 0188 Swedish special edition: Chapter 3 Volume 9 P. 0027 Spanish special edition: Chapter 03 Volume 12 P. 0226 Portuguese special edition Chapter 03 Volume 12 P. 0226 *

COMMISSION REGULATION (EEC) No 1496/77 of 4 July 1977 on communications between Member States and the Commission in the silkworm sector

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 845/72 of 24 April 1972 laying down special measures to encourage silkworm rearing (1), and in particular Article 4 thereof,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 867/77 of 26 April 1977 on the granting of supplementary aid in the silkworm sector for the 1977/78 marketing year (2), and in particular Article 5 thereof,

Whereas to ensure the proper functioning of the aid system referred to in Regulations (EEC) No 845/72 and (EEC) No 867/77 certain information on production and the payment of these aids should be communicated regularly by the producer Member States to the Commission;

Whereas the measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for Flax and Hemp,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

In respect of both the aid referred to in paragraph 2 (1) of Regulation (EEC) No 845/72 and the supplementary aid referred to in Article 1 of Regulation (EEC) No 867/77, producer Member States shall notify the Commission: 1. during the second month following that of the final date for lodging the application for aid: (a) of the number of applications for aid submitted during the current marketing year,

(b) of the number of boxes of eggs for which the applications referred to under (a) have been made,

(c) of the quantity of cocoons produced from these eggs;

2. during the month following that during which final payment of the aid for the marketing year is made, the number of boxes for which:

(a) the entitlement to aid has been established,

(b) the entitlement to aid has not been recognized,

(c) where appropriate, the entitlement to aid has not yet been established.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the third day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 4 July 1977.

For the Commission

Finn GUNDELACH

Vice-President (1)OJ No L 100, 27.4.1972, p. 1. (2)OJ No L 106, 29.4.1977, p. 3.
EXHIBIT
32.1











CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Patient Safety
Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2010,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), Steven H. Kane, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Marc
L. Rose, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





/s/ Steven H.
Kane


Name:
Steven H. Kane


Title:
Chief Executive Officer


Date: May
14, 2010





/s/ Marc L.
Rose


Name:
Marc L. Rose


Title:
Chief Financial Officer


Date: May
14, 2010





The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and
is not being “filed” as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure
document for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended (the “Exchange Act”), or otherwise subject to liability under that
section. This certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference
into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange
Act except to the extent that this Exhibit 32.1 is expressly and specifically
incorporated by reference in any such filing.





A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Town of Woodstock *v.*Gerald Williams et al.

*Wesley W. Horton,*in support of the petition.

Decided May 23, 1984

The defendants’ petition for certification *for*appeal from the Appellate Court, 1 Conn. App. 505, is denied.
810.001-70 Market research policy - use of VA Vendor Information Pages.       When performing market research, contracting officers shall review the Vendor Information Pages (VIP) database at *https://www.vetbiz.va.gov/vip/* as required by subpart 819.70. The contracting officer will search the VIP database by applicable North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) codes to determine whether two or more verified service-disabled veteran-owned small businesses (SDVOSBs) and/or veteran-owned small businesses (VOSBs), with the appropriate NAICS code, are listed as verified in the VIP database. The contracting officer will determine, among other things as the requirement dictates, whether VIP-listed SDVOSBs or VOSBs identified as a result of market research are capable of performing the work, are likely to submit an offer/quote, and whether an award can be made at a fair and reasonable price that offers best value to the Government. The contracting officer shall use the market research for acquisition planning purposes, and as set forth in subpart 819.70, conduct a VA Rule of Two (see 802.101) determination in accordance with the contracting order of priority (see 819.7005 and 819.7006).    **Parent topic:** PART 810 - MARKET RESEARCH
§ 431.429 Request for reconsideration. ( a ) Any petitioner whose petition for a rule has been denied may request reconsideration within 30 days of denial. The request shall contain a statement of facts and reasons supporting reconsideration and shall be submitted in writing to the Secretary.
( b ) The denial of a petition will be reconsidered only where it is alleged and demonstrated that the denial was based on error in law or fact and that evidence of the error is found in the record of the proceedings.
( c ) If the Secretary fails to take action on the request for reconsideration within 30 days, the request is deemed denied, and the petitioner may seek such judicial review as may be appropriate and available.
( d ) A petitioner has not exhausted other administrative remedies until a request for reconsideration has been filed and acted upon or deemed denied.
#### GRAFTON, Appellant, v. BALL, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

June 5, 1914.)

Action by Robert Grafton against John Oscar Ball.

No opinion. Motion to dismiss appeal denied, without costs.
§ 76.133 Criminal penalties. ( a ) Section 223 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, provides for criminal sanctions for willful violation of, attempted violation of, or conspiracy to violate, any regulation issued under Section 161b or 161i of the Act. For purposes of Section 223, all the regulations in part 76 are issued under Section 161b or 161i except for the sections listed in paragraph (b) of this section.
( b ) The regulations in part 76 that are not issued under Section 161b or 161i for the purposes of Section 223 are as follows: §§ 76.1, 76.2, 76.4, 76.5, 76.6, 76.23, 76.33, 76.35, 76.37, 76.39, 76.41, 76.43, 76.45, 76.53, 76.55, 76.60, 76.62, 76.64, 76.70, 76.72, 76.131, and 76.133.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; Virus Infection Analysis.                    

*Date:*                         January 11, 2011.                    

*Time:*                         1 p.m. to 4 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, 6700B Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892. (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Eleazar Cohen, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural Activities, NIAID/NIH/DHHS, Room 3129, 6700 B Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892. 301-435-3564.                         *ec17w@nih.gov.*

                        (Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856,                               ( print page 80063)                            Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)                    

Dated: December 15, 2010.

Jennifer S. Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2010-32023 Filed 12-20-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Patient Safety Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Brian E. Stewart, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and David Dreyer, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Brian E. StewartName: Brian E. StewartTitle: Chief Executive OfficerDate: May 23, 2011/s/ David DreyerName: David DreyerTitle: Chief Financial OfficerDate: May 23, 2011





The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and is not being “filed” as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), or otherwise subject to liability under that section. This certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act except to the extent that this Exhibit 32.1 is expressly and specifically incorporated by reference in any such filing.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
§ 611.110 Assignment or transfer of loans. ( a ) The Loan Documents may not be modified, in whole or in part, without the prior written approval of DOE.
( b ) Upon prior written approval by DOE and the Federal Financing Bank, a certification by the assignor that the assignee is an Eligible Applicant as described in § 611.100 of this part, and subject to paragraph (c) of this section and other provisions of this part, a Borrower may assign or transfer its interest in a loan provided under this part, including the loan documents, to a party that qualifies as an Eligible Applicant.
( c ) The provisions of paragraph (b) of this section shall not apply to transfers which occur by operation of law.
#### Pritchett *et al. v.*Kennedy.

July 16, 1913.

Injunction, etc. Before Judge Hawkins. Laurens' superior court. October 12, 1912.

*J. S. Adams*and *Hines & Jordan,*for plaintiffs in error.

Atkinson, J.

1. On an interlocutory hearing of an application for injunction and receiver by one partner against another, in an action for dissolution of the firm and an accounting, where both parties prayed for dissolution and accounting, and the judge was authorized to find that both parties violated the reciprocal duties of each to the other as partners, among others, in the matters of properly accounting to the other, and in taking exclusive possession of firm assets consisting of products and earnings of the business, there was no abuse of discretion in granting the injunction and appointing a receiver, although neither partner was insolvent, and the excepting partner offered to give bond for proper accounting as to the assets in his hands.

2. The case was tried on the pleadings. The petition was sworn to by the plaintiff positively in so far as it referred to matters derived from his own knowledge, but in so far as derived from the knowledge of others he believed the allegations to be true. Most of the allegations of the petition related to personal acts of the plaintiff and acts of the defendant and her agent concerning which the plaintiff had personal knowledge, and practically everything alleged which did not thus fall within plaintiff’s knowledge was admitted in the answer. See *Bennett*v. *Smith,*108 *Ga.*466 (34 S. E. 156) ; Civil Code, §§ 5475, 5476, 5477.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
### UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION WASHINGTON, DC
Pro-Flight Aviation, Inc
. , Docket No
. 16

- 15

-03 Complainants 

## V. City ofRenton Respondent

NOTICE OF EXTENSION OF TIME This matter is before the Federa l Aviation Administration (FAA) based on the abovereferenced complaint, filed in accordance with FAA Rules of Practice for Federally-Assisted Airport Enforcement Proceedings, 14 

### CFR, Part 16. 

### Pursuant to 14 

### CFR Part 16, 

### subpart B, 

### the date by which the Director' s Determination will be issued in this matter is hereby extended to August 25, 2016. 

### An extension oftime is necessary and appropriate for a fair and complete determination in this case.

7 

### 6 ATE

### CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I HEREBY CERTIFY that on May 10,2016, I caused to be emailed and placed in the United States mail (first class, postage paid) or personally delivered a true copy ofthe foregoing ORDER addressed to: Counsel for Complainant Benjamin 

### H. Kl e in Law offices ofPaul A. Lange, LLC 80 Ferry Boulevard Stratford, CT 06615 bhk@lopal.com Counsel for Respondent Zan etta L. Fontes Senior Assistant City Attorney City ofRenton 1055 South Grady Way Renton, WA 98057 zfontes@rentonwa.gov Hand-Delivered to: FAA Part 16 Airport Proceedings Docket (AGC-600) FAA Office ofAirport Compliance and Management Analysis (AC0-1 00) 

# (]{ M · Claudia Roberts Office ofAirport Compliance

and Management Analysis
1235.003 Policy.

(b) Cost sharing. DOT cost sharing policies that are not otherwise required by law shall be in

accordance with FAR 16.303 and 42.707(a) and Operating Administration (OA) procedures.

(c) Recoupment. DOT recoupment not otherwise required by law shall be in accordance with OA

procedures.

Parent topic: PART 1235—RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CONTRACTING
**New Mexico**

**New Mexico 04 Eddy**
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0681

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

ANDREW DAVID SHEROD,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including July 14, 2023, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

June 7 2023

06/07/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0681