alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
###### Editorial Note on Part 70

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 70 appear at 81 FR 86910, Dec. 2, 2016.

#### § 70.35 Commission action on applications to renew or amend.

In considering an application by a licensee to renew or amend his license, the Commission will apply the criteria set forth in § 70.23.
3. CODES AND STANDARDS

Codes, standards, or other documents referred to in this specification are tobe considered as part of this specification. In the event of a conflict betweenthis specification and the National Electrical Safety Code (NESC), the NESCshall be followed. In the event of a conflict between this specification and allother referenced documents, this specification shall be followed. If a conflictbetween several referenced documents occurs, the more stringent requirementshall be followed. If clarification is necessary, contact the owner.

The most recent editions of the following codes and standards shall befollowed in the design, manufacture, inspection, testing, and shipment of spun,prestressed concrete poles.

3.1 American Concrete Institute (ACI):

> 
ACI 318, Building Code Requirements for Reinforced Concrete

3.2 Prestressed Concrete Institute (PCI):

> 
MNL 116, Manual for Quality Control for Plants and Production of Precast    Prestressed Concrete Products

3.3 American Welding Society (AWS):

> 
AWS D1.1, Recommended Procedures for Welding, Reinforcing Steel, Metal    Inserts, and Connections in Reinforced Concrete Construction
**3.4 American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM):

ASTM A82 Steel Wire Plain, For Concrete Reinforcement

ASTM A416 Steel Strand, Uncoated 7-wire For Prestressed                  Concrete

ASTM A421 Uncoated Stressed Relieved Steel For Prestressed                  Concrete

ASTM A496 Steel Wire, Deformed For Concrete                      Reinforcement

ASTM A615/A615M Deformed and Plain Billet-Steel Bars For                  Concrete Reinforcement

ASTM A617/A617M Axle-Steel Deformed and Plain Bars For                  Concrete Reinforcement

ASTM A641M Zinc Coated (Galvanized) Carbon Steel                  Wire-Metric

ASTM A706A/A706M Low Alloy Steel Deformed Bars For Concrete                  Reinforcement

ASTM C31 and 39 Specifications for Sampling Concrete and                  Testing Concrete Cylinders

ASTM C33 Concrete Aggregates

ASTM C131 Standard Test Method for Resistance to                  Degradation of Small-Size Coarse Aggregate by Abrasion and                  Impact in the Los Angeles Machine

ASTM C150 Portland Cement

ASTM C172 Sampling Freshly Mixed Concrete

ASTM C289 Testing Potential Alkali-Silica Reactivity of                  Aggregates

ASTM C494 Chemical Admixtures For Concrete

ASTM C881 Epoxy-Resin-Base Bonding Systems for Concrete

ASTM C1089 Standard Specification For Spun Cast Prestressed                  Concrete Poles
**3.5 Industrial Fasteners Institute (IFI):
Fastener Standards
**3.6 American National Standards Institute (ANSI) C2, National      Electrical Safety Code
**3.7 American Society of Civil Engineers/Prestressed Concrete Institute      (ASCE/PCI) Joint Committee on Concrete Poles:

Guide for the Design of Prestressed Concrete Poles, latest edition********
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S 10-QSB FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                       1,047,758
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,574,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (366,584)
<INVENTORY>                                    239,256
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,698,903
<PP&E>                                       2,280,682
<DEPRECIATION>                             (1,181,116)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              17,060,871
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,292,523
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       395,826
<OTHER-SE>                                  10,856,462
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                17,060,871
<SALES>                                      4,053,955
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,053,955
<CGS>                                        2,837,768
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,112,212
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                45,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,896,025)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,896,025)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,896,025)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.48)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.48)
        

</TABLE>
Second Department,

May, 2006

(May 2, 2006)

#### Barbara Abraham, Appellant, v Febe Bello et al., Respondents.

[816 NYS2d 118]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Martin, J.), dated December 14, 2004, which granted the motion of the defendant Gilberto Sanchez, and the separate *498motion of the defendants Febe Bello and Febe Mislang, for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them, on the ground that the plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d).

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with one bill of costs, the motions are denied, and the complaint is reinstated.

The motions should have been denied as the defendants failed to establish their prima facie entitlement to summary judgment in their favor. Although the report of an orthopedist for the defendant Gilberto Sanchez set forth in degrees the results of his range of motion testing of the plaintiff, he did not compare those findings to a normal range of motion. “Thus, the defendants’ proof failed to objectively demonstrate that the plaintiff did not suffer a permanent consequential or significant limitation of use of [her] cervical as a result of the subject accident” *(Aronov v Leybovich,*3 AD3d 511, 512 [2004]; *see also Claude v Clements,*301 AD2d 554 [2003]).

In light of our determination, the remaining issues have been rendered academic. Miller, J.P., Santucci, Rivera and Lifson, JJ., concur.
#### § 76.2 Scope.

The regulations in this part apply only to those portions of the Portsmouth and Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plants leased by the Corporation, per the Lease Agreement between the Department of Energy and the United States Enrichment Corporation. This part also gives notice to all persons who knowingly provide to the Corporation or any contractor, or subcontractor any components, equipment, materials, or other goods or services that relate to the activities subject to this part that they may be individually subject to NRC enforcement action for violation of § 76.10.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-7445

GLENN V. RHODES, Petitioner - Appellant, versus PATRICK CONROY, Warden; ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF MARYLAND, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, District Judge. (CA-00-1085-WMN) Submitted: January 16, 2001 Decided: February 15, 2001 Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.Glenn V. Rhodes, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Mary Ann Rapp Ince, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Glenn V. Rhodes appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s memorandum and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny acertificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Rhodes v. Conroy , No. CA-00- 1085-WMN (D. Md. Oct. 5, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
IV 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 882 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives during Teacher Appreciation Week regarding the importance of education, particularly civics 

education. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 8, 2018 

Mr. NORMAN submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Education and the Workforce 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives during 

Teacher Appreciation Week regarding the importance of 

education, particularly civics education. 

Whereas educators play an important role in preparing students for the future; 

Whereas through civics education parents, teachers, mentors, 

and all educators emphasize the importance of understanding how our Government operates; and 

Whereas having students who are engaged and educated on 

the subject of civics will have a positive impact on the future of the Nation: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that to continue to cherish our rights and duVerDate Sep 11 2014 23:32 May 08, 2018 Jkt 079200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\HR882.IH HR882

lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 882 IH 

1 ties, all Americans should recognize the importance of 

2 civics education. 

Æ 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
IV 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 852 

Expressing support for the designation of May 3, 2018, as a ‘‘National 

Day of Reason’’ and recognizing the importance of reason in the betterment of humanity. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 26, 2018 

Mr. HUFFMAN (for himself, Ms. NORTON, Mr. POCAN, and Ms. LOFGREN) 

submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee 

on Oversight and Government Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for the designation of May 3, 2018, 

as a ‘‘National Day of Reason’’ and recognizing the 

importance of reason in the betterment of humanity. 

Whereas the application of reason has proven to offer hope 

for human survival upon Earth, improving conditions 

within the universe, and cultivating intelligent, moral, 

and ethical interactions among people and their environments; 

Whereas those who wrote the Constitution, the basic document for governing the affairs of humankind within the 

United States, based it upon principles delineated within 

the philosophies distinguishing the historical Age of Reason; 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 852 IH 

Whereas most citizens of the United States purport to value 

reason and its application; 

Whereas it is the duty and responsibility of every citizen to 

promote the development and application of reason; and 

Whereas May 3, 2018, would be an appropriate date to designate as a ‘‘National Day of Reason’’: Now, therefore, 

be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) supports the designation of a ‘‘National 

3 Day of Reason’’; and 

4 (2) encourages all citizens, residents, and visi5 tors to join in observing this day and focusing upon 

6 the employment of reason, critical thought, the sci7 entific method, and free inquiry to the resolution of 

8 human problems and for the welfare of humankind. 

Æ 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
# EUR-Lex - 31978L0511 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31978L0511

**Commission Directive 78/511/EEC of 24 May 1978 amending Directive 74/268/EEC laying down special conditions concerning the presence of 'Avena fatua' in fodder plant and cereal seed **

*
Official Journal L 157 , 15/06/1978 P. 0034 - 0034 Finnish special edition: Chapter 3 Volume 10 P. 0004 Greek special edition: Chapter 03 Volume 21 P. 0150 Swedish special edition: Chapter 3 Volume 10 P. 0004 Spanish special edition: Chapter 03 Volume 14 P. 0118 Portuguese special edition Chapter 03 Volume 14 P. 0118 *

COMMISSION DIRECTIVE of 24 May 1978 amending Directive 74/268/EEC laying down special conditions concerning the presence of "Avena fatua" in fodder plant and cereal seed (78/511/EEC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community,

Having regard to Council Directive 66/401/EEC of 14 June 1966 on the marketing of fodder plant seed (1), as last amended by Council Directive 78/55/EEC (2), and in particular Article 11 thereof,

Whereas the said Directive laid down tolerances in respect of the presence of Avena fatua in fodder plant seed;

Whereas these tolerances appeared to be too high for certain requirements;

Whereas Commission Directive 74/268/EEC of 2 May 1974 (3) therefore laid down special conditions in respect of the presence of Avena fatua in fodder plant seed;

Whereas the First Commission Directive 78/386/EEC of 18 April 1978 amending the Annexes to Council Directive 66/401/EEC on the marketing of fodder plant seed (4) laid down new conditions at Community level as regards the presence of Avena fatua in fodder plant seed;

Whereas because of these amendments the special conditions contained in Directive 74/268/EEC are no longer necessary;

Whereas these special conditions should therefore be repealed as far as fodder plant seed is concerned;

Whereas the measures provided for in this Directive are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on Seeds and Propagating Material for Agriculture, Horticulture and Forestry,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DIRECTIVE:

Article 1

Article 1 of Directive 74/268/EEC is hereby repealed.

Article 2

Member States shall bring into force, not later than 1 July 1980, the laws, regulations or administrative provisions necessary to comply with this Directive. They shall forthwith inform the Commission thereof, who shall inform the other Member States.

Article 3

This Directive is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 24 May 1978.

For the Commission

Finn GUNDELACH

Vice-President (1)OJ No 125, 11.7.1966, p. 2298/66. (2)OJ No L 16, 20.1.1978, p. 23. (3)OJ No L 141, 24.5.1974, p. 19. (4)OJ No L 113, 25.4.1978, p. 1.
# L_2023227EN.01002701.xml

| 14.9.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 227/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.9.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 227/27

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE No 163/2020

of 23 October 2020

amending Annex XIII (Transport) to the EEA Agreement [2023/1738]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (‘the EEA Agreement’), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/411 of 19 November 2019 amending Directive 2009/45/EC of the European Parliament and the Council on safety rules and standards for passenger ships, as regards the safety requirements for passenger ships engaged on domestic voyages (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/411 of 19 November 2019 amending Directive 2009/45/EC of the European Parliament and the Council on safety rules and standards for passenger ships, as regards the safety requirements for passenger ships engaged on domestic voyages (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following indent is added in point 56f (Directive 2009/45/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council) of Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘— | 32020 R 0411: Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/411 of 19 November 2019 (OJ L 83, 19.3.2020, p. 1.).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32020 R 0411: Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/411 of 19 November 2019 (OJ L 83, 19.3.2020, p. 1.).’

Article 2

The text of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/411 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 24 October 2020, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1), or on the day of the entry into force of Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 107/2020 of 14 July 2020 (2), whichever is the later.

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 23 October 2020.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Sabine MONAUNI

---

(1)  
  OJ L 83, 19.3.2020, p. 1.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

(2)  Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 107/2020 of 14 July 2020 amending Annex XIII (Transport) to the EEA Agreement [2023/1367] (OJ L 172, 6.7.2023, p. 23).

2

---
PGI 246.1 -GENERAL

Parent topic: PGI Part 246 - QUALITY ASSURANCE

PGI 246.103 Contracting office responsibilities.

(2)(i) In preparing instructions for Government inspections, the technical activity shall consider, as

applicable—

(A) The past quality history of the contractor;

(B) The criticality of the material procured in relation to its intended use, considering factors such

as—

(1) Reliability;

(2) Safety;

(3) Interchangeability; and

(4) Maintainability;

(C) Problems encountered in the development of the material;

(D) Problems encountered in other procurements of the same or similar material;

(E) Available feedback data from contract administration, receiving, testing, or using activities; and

(F) The experience of other contractors in overcoming manufacturing problems.

(ii) The instructions shall—

(A) Be kept to a minimum;

(B) Ensure that the activities requested are in direct relation to contract quality requirements to

serve as objective evidence of quality conformance; and

(C) Be prepared on a contract-by-contract basis.

(iii) The instructions shall not—

(A) Serve as a substitute for incomplete contract quality requirements;

(B) Impose greater inspection requirements than are in the contract;

(C) Use broad or general designations such as—

(1) All requirements;

(2) All characteristics; or

(3) All characteristics in the classification of defects;
(D) Be used for routine administrative procedures; or

(E) Specify continued inspection requirements when statistically sound sampling will provide an

adequate degree of protection.

(iv) After issuing the instructions, the technical activity must—

(A) Provide the contract administration office with available information regarding those factors that

resulted in the requirement for Government inspection;

(B) Periodically analyze the need to continue, change, or discontinue the instructions; and

(C) Advise the contract administration office of the results of the periodic analyses.
DISMISS; and Opinion Filed February 13 , 2017

. 

# S

In The 

## Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 17

- 00022

- CV

ASWAN TRADING , Appellant

V.

MUSTAFEEN ABBAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 162nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC

- 13

- 11338



### MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Lang, Fillmore, and Schenck

Opinion by Justice Schenck

Before the Court is appellant’s February 6, 2017 agreed motion to dismiss appeal. We

grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1( a )(1). We order each party to

bear its own cost, if any, of this appeal.

170022F.P05 /D AVID J. S CHENCK /

DAVID J. SCHENCK

JUSTICE– 2

– 

# S

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT

ASWAN TRADING, Appellant

No. 05

- 17

- 00022

- CV V.

MUSTAFEEN ABBAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 162nd Judicial District

Court, Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC

- 13

- 11338.

Opinion delivered by Just ice Schenck,

Justices Lang and Fillmore participating.

In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED

.

It is ORDERED that each party bear its own costs, if any, of this appeal.

Judgment entered this 13th day of February , 2017.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 516 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 516

Supporting the bid of Los Angeles, California, to bring the 2028 Summer 
Olympic Games back to the United States and pledging the cooperation of 
         the House of Representatives with respect to that bid.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 13, 2017

    Mr. Knight (for himself and Mr. Gomez) submitted the following 
   resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Supporting the bid of Los Angeles, California, to bring the 2028 Summer 
Olympic Games back to the United States and pledging the cooperation of 
         the House of Representatives with respect to that bid.

Whereas the International Olympic Committee will meet on September 13, 2017, in 
        Lima, Peru, to consider a site for the Summer Olympic and Paralympic 
        Games (in this preamble referred to as the ``Games'') in 2028;
Whereas the United States Olympic Committee has selected Los Angeles, 
        California, as the candidate of the United States for the 2028 Games;
Whereas the Games further the cause of world peace and understanding;
Whereas the country that hosts the Games performs an act of international 
        goodwill;
Whereas the Games have not been held in the United States since 1996;
Whereas many of the world-class venues to be used in Los Angeles' 2028 plan for 
        the Games are already built or are planned as permanent facilities; and
Whereas Los Angeles is positioned to deliver an innovative, fiscally 
        responsible, and sustainable Games: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) advises the International Olympic Committee that the 
        United States would welcome the holding of the 2028 Summer 
        Olympic and Paralympic Games in Los Angeles, California, the 
        site designated by the United States Olympic Committee;
            (2) expresses the sincere hope that the United States will 
        be selected as the site for the 2028 Summer Olympic and 
        Paralympic Games and pledges cooperation and support toward the 
        successful fulfillment of those Games in the highest sense of 
        the Olympic tradition; and
            (3) respectfully requests that the Clerk of the House 
        transmit an enrolled copy of this resolution to the United 
        States Olympic Committee and to the International Olympic 
        Committee.
                                 <all>
```