alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
The Honorable Jean C. Hamilton, Chi ef Judge, United States District Court for 1 the Eastern District of Missouri. United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 97-2340

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Missouri. Carlos Fuentez, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: September 17, 1997 Filed: September 22, 1997

___________ Before WOLLMAN, LOKEN, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. In1991, Carlos Fuentez was convicted of conspiring to distribute and possess cocaine and d istributing cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841 and 846, and using and carrying a firearm during a drug-trafficking crime, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c); Fuentez was sentenced to a total of 295 months’ imprisonment. Upo n Fue ntez’s 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion, the district court vacated his firearm conviction 1 in light of Bailey v. United States , 116 S. Ct . 501, 506 (1995) (defining “use” prong of-2-

§ 924(c)(1)). The court then resentenced Fuentez to 295 months’ imprisonment an d five yea rs’ supervised release, imposing a 2-level enhancement for possession of a firearm, see U.S. Sentencing Guideli nes Manual § 2D1.1(b)(1) (add 2 levels if firearm involved). Fuentez appeals, arguing that the district court lacked jurisdiction to resentence him on the unchalleng ed drug conviction; that the “sentencing package” concept does not ap ply to section 2255 proceedings; and that application of the firearm-possession enhancement violates double jeopardy and due process. Because Fuentez’s arguments are foreclosed by United States v. Har rison , 113 F.3d 135, 137-38 (8th Cir. 1997), the judgment is affirmed. A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

February 3, 2016

s0127 

# Order

Clerk February 3, 2016

152138 & (147)

BRUCE WHITMAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v SC: 152138

COA: 294703

Genesee CC: 08

- 087993

- CL

CITY OF BURTON and CHARLES SMILEY,

Defendants

- Appellees.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the J uly 9, 2015

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in

lieu of granting leave to appeal, we VACATE those parts of the Court of Appeals opinion

holding that a plaintiff’s actions or conduct, as an objective matter, m ust advance the

public interest to entitle a plaintiff to the protection of the Whistleblowers’ Protection Act

(WPA) , MCL 15.361 et seq . and that the plaintiff here failed to establish sufficient

evidence of the necessary causal connection between his clai med protected activity and

the alleged adverse employment action to avoid a judgment notwithstanding the verdict.

In light of the Court of Appeals’ holding that, pursuant to Wurtz v Beecher Metropolitan

District , 495 Mich 242 (2014), the plaintiff is not an “employee” placed to bring a claim

under the WPA, resolution of these other issues was unnecessary. In all other res pects,

leave to appeal is DENIED , because we are not persuaded that the remaining questions

presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion to expedite proceedings is

DENIED as moot.
§ 601.200 Agency and legislative liaison. ( a ) The prohibition on the use of appropriated funds, in § 601.100 (a), does not apply in the case of a payment of reasonable compensation made to an officer or employee of a person requesting or receiving a Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement if the payment is for agency and legislative liaison activities not directly related to a covered Federal action.
( b ) For purposes of paragraph (a) of this section, providing any information specifically requested by an agency or Congress is allowable at any time.
( c ) For purposes of paragraph (a) of this section, the following agency and legislative liaison activities are allowable at any time only where they are not related to a specific solicitation for any covered Federal action: ( 1 ) Discussing with an agency (including individual demonstrations) the qualities and characteristics of the person's products or services, conditions or terms of sale, and service capabilities; and,
( 2 ) Technical discussions and other activities regarding the application or adaptation of the person's products or services for an agency's use.
( d ) For purposes of paragraph (a) of this section, the following agencies and legislative liaison activities are allowable only where they are prior to formal solicitation of any covered Federal action: ( 1 ) Providing any information not specifically requested but necessary for an agency to make an informed decision about initiation of a covered Federal action;
( 2 ) Technical discussions regarding the preparation of an unsolicited proposal prior to its official submission; and,
( 3 ) Capability presentations by persons seeking awards from an agency pursuant to the provisions of the Small Business Act, as amended by Public Law 95-507 and other subsequent amendments.
( e ) Only those activities expressly authorized by this section are allowable under this section.
# EUR-Lex - 31969R0448 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31969R0448

**Regulation (EEC) No 448/69 of the Council of 11 March 1969 amending Regulation (EEC) No 315/68 fixing the quality standards for flowering bulbs, corms and tubers **

*
Official Journal L 061 , 12/03/1969 P. 0001 - 0002 Finnish special edition: Chapter 3 Volume 2 P. 0176 Danish special edition: Series I Chapter 1969(I) P. 0092 Swedish special edition: Chapter 3 Volume 2 P. 0176 English special edition: Series I Chapter 1969(I) P. 0100 Greek special edition: Chapter 03 Volume 4 P. 0102 Spanish special edition: Chapter 03 Volume 3 P. 0077 Portuguese special edition Chapter 03 Volume 3 P. 0077 *

REGULATION (EEC) No 448/69 OF THE COUNCIL of 11 March 1969 amending Regulation (EEC) No 315/68 fixing the quality standards for flowering bulbs, corms and tubers

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community;

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 234/68 (1) of 27 February 1968 on the establishment of a common organisation of the market in live trees and other plants, bulbs, roots and the like, cut flowers and ornamental foliage, and in particular Article 3 thereof;

Having regard to the proposal from the Commission;

Whereas regulation (EEC) No 315/68 (2) lays down in the Annex thereto provisions concerning size gradings ; whereas those provisions do not cover products of the types Hippeastrum, Muscari and Scilla ; whereas those products should be included in that Annex in order to achieve the purposes of the quality standards more satisfactorily;

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The first column of the Table in Section III (Sizing) of the Annex to Regulation (EEC) No 315/68 is hereby deleted.

Article 2

The products listed in the Annex to this Regulation together with the provisions relating to each of them shall be inserted in the Table in Section III of the Annex to Regulation (EEC) No 315/68, in their alphabetical position.

Article 3

This Regulation shall enter into force on the third day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 11 March 1969.

For the Council

The President

J.P. BUCHLER

ANNEX

>PIC FILE= "T0001943">(1) OJ No L 55, 2.3.1968, p. 1. (2) OJ No L 71, 21.3.1968, p. 1.
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Corporate Trust Services**

  MAC R1204-010  9062 Old Annapolis Road  Columbia, MD 21045  Tel: 410 884 2000  Fax: 410 715 2380 |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

Banc of America Merrill LynchCommercial Mortgage Inc.

Bank of America Tower

One Bryant Park

New York, New York 10036

 

 

Re:         Annual Statement of Compliance for Morgan Stanley Bank of America Merrill LynchTrust 2013-C8, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2013-C8

 

 

Per the Pooling and ServicingAgreement dated as of February 1, 2013 (the "Agreement"), theundersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., asCertificate Administrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies asfollows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2016 (the "ReportingPeriod"):

 

(a)          A review of Wells Fargo's activities during the Reporting Period and of itsperformance under the Agreement has been made under such officer's supervision;and

 

(b)          To the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo hasfulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respectsthroughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

February 22, 2017

 

 

/s/Brian Smith

BRIAN SMITH

Vice President 

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll  go far |
|------------------------|-------------------------------------|
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 23, 2013

d1216 

# Order

Clerk December 23, 2013

147650 & (19)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 147650

COA: 315725

Wayne CC: 06

- 010995

- FC

MICHAEL BRUCE CURB,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 31, 2013 order

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). The

motion to remand is DENIED.
# EUR-Lex - 31984D0017 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31984D0017

**84/17/EEC: Commission Decision of 22 December 1983 concerning the implementation by the United Kingdom of certain measures to adjust capacity in the fisheries sector pursuant to Council Directive 83/515/EEC (Only the English text is authentic) **

*
Official Journal L 018 , 21/01/1984 P. 0039 - 0039 *

*****

COMMISSION DECISION

of 22 December 1983

concerning the implementation by the United Kingdom of certain measures to adjust capacity in the fisheries sector pursuant to Council Directive 83/515/EEC

(Only the English text is authentic)

(84/17/EEC)

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN

COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community,

Having regard to Council Directive 83/515/83 of 4 October 1983 concerning certain measures to adjust capacity in the fisheries sector (1), and in particular Article 7 (1) thereof,

Whereas the United Kingdom intends to introduce a system of financial aids for measures involving temporary or permanent reductions of production capacity; whereas, on 15 November 1983, it communicated the information concerning this scheme required under Article 6 of Directive 83/515/EEC;

Whereas, in accordance with Article 7 of the Directive, the Commission has considered whether, on the basis of their conformity with the Directive and taking account of the other structural measures existing or planned in the fisheries sector, the measures contemplated fulfil the conditions for financial contributions from the Community;

Whereas this Decision does not relate to national aid referred to in Article 12 of the Directive;

Whereas the provisions of this Decision are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee for the Fishing Industry,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The measures which the United Kingdom intends to take to implement a financial aid scheme for measures involving temporary and permanent reductions of production capacity fulfil the conditions for financial contributions from the Community.

Article 2

This Decision shall not apply to national aid referred to in Article 12 of Directive 83/515/EEC.

Article 3

This Decision is addressed to the United Kingdom.

Done at Brussels, 22 December 1983.

For the Commission

Giorgios CONTOGEORGIS

Member of the Commission

(1) OJ No L 290, 22. 10. 1983, p. 15.
EXHIBIT 32.1CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

       In connection with the quarterlyreport of CNB Corporation on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2007 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, W.Jennings Duncan, President and Chief Executive Officer of CNB Corporation,certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:
| 1. | The  above-listed Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)  or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                 |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|    |                                                                                                                                                                    |
| 2. | The  information contained in the above-listed Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all  material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the  Company. |
| Date:   August 9, 2007 | /s/W.  Jennings Duncan                       W. Jennings Duncan  President and Chief Executive Officer |
|-----------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                             |                                                                                                                                                                                                                           |
1761 East St. Andrew Place

Santa Ana. CA 92705-4934



Tel 714 247 6000

Fax 714 247 6009





ANNUAL STATEMENT AS TO COMPLIANCE







The undersigned, David Co, a Director of Deutsche Bank
Trust Company Americas, as the Certificate Administrator (a “Certifying Servicer”) under the Pooling and Servicing
Agreement, dated as of February 1, 2013 (the “Agreement”), by and among, UBS Commercial Mortgage Securitization Corp.,
as Depositor, Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, Midland Loan Services,
a Division of PNC Bank, National Association ,as Special Servicer, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Trustee, Certificate
Administrator, Paying Agent and Custodian, and Situs Holdings, LLC, as Operating Advisor, here by certifies in accordance with
Section 10.11 of the Agreement:



| | A) | A review of such Certifying Servicer's activities from February 28, 2013 to December 31, 2013  (the “Reporting Period”)
and of such Certifying Servicer's performance under the Agreement has been made under such officer's supervision and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | B) | That, as to the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, such Certifying Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations
under the Agreement, in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





DEUTSCHE BANK
TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS

as Certificate
Administrator



BY: David Co

Title: Director

Date: March
1, 2014
Exhibit 10.22


 


Mr. Wayne
Pastore


7
Technology Park Dr.


Westford,
MA  01886


 


February 18, 2010


 


Dear
Wayne:


 


This
letter confirms that, effective February 8, 2010, you have assumed the
role of Interim Chief Financial Officer of Sonus, Inc. (the “Company”).  Your duties as Interim CFO will be in addition
to your current duties as Vice President, Finance, and Corporate
Controller.  In exchange for assuming
these additional duties, you will receive:


 


1.           Base Salary.            An increase in your base salary from
$210,000 to $240,000, effective as of February 8, 2010.


 


2.           Retention Bonus.   The right to a bonus (in addition to whatever
bonus you may receive pursuant to the Company’s 2010 cash incentive program) in
the amount of $125,000, payable as follows:


 


a.                                       One-half ($62,500)
on the earlier of (i) the first day of employment of a new permanent CFO
or (ii) August 8, 2010 (i.e., six months from the effective date of
your appointment as Interim CFO); and


 


b.                                      One-half
($62,500) upon successful transition to a new permanent CFO, which shall be not
less than three but not more than six months after such appointment (unless you
apply for and are accepted as the new permanent CFO, in which case the second
half of the bonus will be paid upon your appointment).


 


c.                                       Whatever
portion of the $125,000 that has not been paid previously will be paid to you
upon the termination of your employment by the Company without Cause or by you
for Good Reason pursuant to paragraph 6 of your employment letter dated October 2,
2008 (your “October 2008 Letter”)


 


3.           If you are relieved of the additional
responsibilities of Interim CFO, such action will not constitute Good Reason as
defined in paragraph 7(b)(B) of your October 2008 Letter.


 


You
are, and will remain, an employee at will; nothing in this letter constitutes a
guaranty of employment for any particular period.  Capitalized terms not defined herein have the
meanings given to them in the October 2008 Letter.  Except as modified by this letter, the terms
of your October 2008 Letter remain in full force and effect.


 


	
  Sincerely,

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  /s/
  Kathy Harris

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Kathy
  Harris

  	
   

  



 

















 


VP
of Human Resources


 


 


	
  ACCEPTED:

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  /s/ Wayne Pastore

  	
   

  
	
  Wayne
  Pastore

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Date:
  

  	
  2/19/10
§ 770.3 What general limitations apply to this part? ( a ) Nothing in this part affects or modifies in any way section 120(h) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (42 U.S.C. 9620(h)).
( b ) Individual proposals for transfers of property are subject to NEPA review as implemented by 10 CFR part 1021.
( c ) Any indemnification agreed to by the DOE is subject to the availability of funds.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AND INCOME STATEMENT AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           4,617
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   12,031
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      7,942
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                25,746
<PP&E>                                             633
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  27,355
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           49,180
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     30,000
<COMMON>                                           669
<OTHER-SE>                                     111,145
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    27,355
<SALES>                                        199,640
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               199,640
<CGS>                                          184,866
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  184,866
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                53,208
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,054
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (41,488)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (41,488)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (41,488)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.62)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.62)
        

</TABLE>
Need to return call by / at/between and . Signature: Project No.: 0317.02.005.520 Page 1 of 1 Project Name: 2015 Annual Review – Preliminary Category Review OCPSF (PSC 414) 

### CBI? Yes No TELEPHONE CALL RECORD Incoming Outgoing Date: 12/22/2014 Time: 11:00 am pm

Company Name: Viskase Corporation (Loudon, TN) ERG Staff Name: Elizabeth Gentile

Contact Name: Michael Yoder, Viskase Corporation Contact Phone Number: (865) 458-2071 General Subject: 2013 TRI Carbon Disulfide Releases from Viskase Corporation TRI ID: 37774VSKSCEASTL



### TOPICS DISCUSSED AND ACTION TAKEN

Based on a review of Viskase Corpor ation (in Loudon, TN) on EPA’s Envirofact s website, I identified Mr. P.J. Glarrow as the TRIS contact for th e facility. I called Mr. Glarrow on December 22, 2014 to discuss the carbon disulfide indirect releases reported by the facility in the 2013 TRI. Mr. Gla rrow directed me to Michael Yoder.

I called and left a message for Mr. Yoder on December 22, 2014 at 11:00 AM to di scuss the carbon disulfide releases.

I called and left a message for Mr . Yoder on January 6, 2015 at 11:00 AM.

I called and left a message for Mr . Yoder on January 9, 2015 at 10:50 AM.

I called and left a message for Mr. Yoder on January 14, 2015 at 9:30 AM.

Mr. Yoder returned my call on January 21, 2015 and stated that he thought the carbon disulfide releases were likely overestimated and that he would follow up w ith me. Mr. Yoder did not provide any additional information or respond to my request.
PGI 217.502-1 General.

(a) Written agreement on responsibility for management and administration—

(1) Assisted acquisitions. When the contracting activity of one DoD Component provides acquisition

assistance to deployed units or personnel from another DoD Component—

(A) The written interagency agreement between the servicing DoD Component and the requesting

DoD Component, required by FAR 17.502-1(a)(1), shall be documented on the FS Form 7600A,

United States Government Interagency Agreement (see template at

https://www.fiscal.treasury.gov/files/forms/form-7600a.pdf );

(B) Procurement support should be on a nonreimbursable basis, unless the parties mutually agree, in

writing, for reimbursable support; and

(C) The DD Form 448, Military Interdepartmental Purchase Request (MIPR), shall be used to provide

a description of the supplies/services and certification of funds available to support the requirement.

Parent topic: PGI 217.502 Procedures.