alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 4
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 4 appear at 77 FR 39904, July 6, 2012.

§ 4.123 Reasonable accommodation. ( a ) A recipient shall make reasonable accommodation to the known physical or mental limitations of an otherwise qualified disabled applicant or employee unless the recipient can demonstrate that the accommodation would impose an undue hardship on the operation of its program or activity.
( b ) Reasonable accommodation may include: ( 1 ) Making facilities used by employees readily accessible to and usable by disabled persons, and
( 2 ) job restructuring, part-time or modified work schedules, acquisition or modification of equipment or devices, the provision of readers or interpreters, and other similar actions. This list is neither all-inclusive nor meant to suggest that an employer must follow all the actions listed.
( c ) In determining pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section whether an accommodation would impose an undue hardship on the operation of a recipient's program or activity, factors to be considered include: ( 1 ) The overall size of the recipient's program or activity with respect to number of employees, number and type of facilities, and size of budget;
( 2 ) The type of the recipient's operations, including the composition and structure of the recipient's workforce; and
( 3 ) The nature and cost of the accommodation needed.
( d ) A recipient may not deny any employment opportunity to a qualified disabled employee or applicant if the basis for denial is the need to make reasonable accommodation to the physical or mental limitations of the employee or applicant.
[45 FR 14535, Mar. 6, 1980, as amended at 68 FR 51345, Aug. 26, 2003]
Exhibit 32.2


Certification of Chief Financial Officer Under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002








The undersigned officer of The First Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company") hereby certifies that the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010 to which this certification is being furnished as an exhibit (the "Report"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. This certification is provided pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K ("Item 601(b)(32)") promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"), and the Exchange Act. In accordance with clause (ii) of Item 601(b)(32), this certification (A) shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and (B) shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.





Date: August 5, 2010








/s/ F. Stephen Ward


F. Stephen Ward


Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer


The First Bancorp, Inc.
#### KAMMAN, Respondent, v. KAMMAN, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

March 3, 1915.)

Action by Cora A. Kamman against John H. Kamman.

PER CURIAM.

Appeals from orders dismissed, unless appellant file and serve the printed papers and briefs on or before the 7th day of March, and be ready to argue the appeals on the 12th day of March. Appeal from judgment dismissed, unless appellant file and serve the printed papers and briefs on appeal on or before the 12th day of March, and be ready to argue the appeal on the 15th day of March. See, also, 151 N. Y. Supp. 226.
H. Res. 710

In the House of Representatives, U.S., 

March 8, 2006.

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule 

XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the 

Whole House on the state of the Union for further consideration of the bill (H.R. 4167) to amend the Federal Food, 

Drug, and Cosmetic Act to provide for uniform food safety 

warning notification requirements, and for other purposes. 

No further general debate shall be in order. The bill shall be 

considered as read. The bill shall be considered for amendment under the five-minute rule. Notwithstanding clause 11 

of rule XVIII, no amendment shall be in order except those 

printed in the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution. Each such amendment may be offered only in the order printed in the report, may be offered 

only by a Member designated in the report, shall be considered as read, shall be debatable for the time specified in the 

report equally divided and controlled by the proponent and an 

opponent, shall not be subject to amendment, and shall not 
2

•HRES 710 EH 

be subject to a demand for division of the question in the 

House or in the Committee of the Whole. All points of order 

against such amendments are waived. At the conclusion of 

consideration of the bill for amendment the Committee shall 

rise and report the bill to the House with such amendments 

as may have been adopted. The previous question shall be 

considered as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to 

final passage without intervening motion except one motion 

to recommit with or without instructions.

Attest: 

Clerk.
#### William Rogers et al., Respondents, v. Pact Realty Corp. et al., Appellants.

Judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated January 23, 1969, modified, on the law, by inserting in the second ordering paragraph, following the word *“*answers ”, the words *“*to the amended complaint ”; and by adding a paragraph severing the cross claims of defendant Pact Realty Corporation against the other defendants. As so modified, judgment affirmed, with one bill of $10 costs and disbursements to respondents, jointly against *930appellants filing separate briefs. In our opinion, the tax sale and the tax deed to defendant Pact Realty Corp., based on default in paying the second half of the 1963-64 taxes, were invalid because of the failure to have the word “ Arrears ” noted on the 1964^65 tax bill as required by section 71 of the Suffolk County Tax Act. (See *Hutch*v. Platt, 32 A D 2d 925.) The instant case does not involve the validity of a tax or assessment and the provisions of section 63 of the Suffolk County Tax Act are therefore inapplicable. We find no grounds for disturbing the Special Term’s determination, except as herein modified, in any of defendants’ other contentions. The judgment is modified to permit a determination of the cross claims, a question which was not presented to or decided by the Special Term. Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, Rabin, Munder and Martuseello, JJ., concur.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16
- 4754

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. ABDI RAZAQ ABSHIR OSMAN, a/k/a Abdirasaq Abshir , Defendant

- Appellant

.

No. 16
- 4756

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. MOHAMED ABDI JAMA, a/k/a Mohammed Abdi Jamah , Defendant

- Appellant

.

No. 1 6
- 4758

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,2 v. ABDICASIIS CABAASE, a/k/a Ahmed Mahomood , Defendant

- Appellant

.

No. 17
- 4274

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. MOHAMED FARAH, a/k/a Mahamed Farraah Hassan , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal s from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Norfolk

. Raymond A. Jackson , District Judge. ( 2:10

- cr
- 00057

- RAJ

- DEM

- 5 ; 2:10

- cr
- 00057

- RAJ

- DEM

- 2 ; 2:10

- cr
- 00057

- RAJ

- DEM

- 4 ; 2:10

- cr
- 00057

- RAJ

- DEM

- 6 )

Submitted : November 17, 2017 Decided: December 6, 2017

Before KING, KEENAN, and FLOYD , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Trey R. Kelleter , VANDEVENTER BLACK LLP , Norfolk, Virginia; Jason Alan Dunn , JASON A. DUNN, PLC , Virginia Beach, Virginia; Lawrence H. Woodward, Jr. , SHUTTLEWORTH, RULOFF, SWAIN, HADDAD & MORECOCK, P.C. , Virginia Beach, Virginia; Robert B. Rigney , PROTOGYROU & RIGNEY , Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellants. Dana J. Boente, United States Attorney, Richard D. Cooke, Assistant United3 States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.4 PER CURIAM: Abdi Razaq Abs hir Osman, Mohamed Abdi Jama, Abdicasiis Cabaase, and Mohamed Farah (collectively, “Defendants”) appeal their convictions and life sentences for piracy, in violation 18 U.S.C. § 1651 (2012). * We conclude that Defendants’ challenges to their convictions an d life sentences are barred by the law

- of

- the

- case doctrine because we previously considered and rejected Defendants’ arguments in United
States v. Said , 798 F.3d 182, 193, 198

- 200 (4th Cir. 2015 )

. S ee United States v. Aramony , 166 F.3d 655, 661 (4th Cir. 1999) (describing law

- of

- the

- case doctrine and its exceptions). Accordingly, we affirm the amended judgments of the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before t his court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.

AFFIRMED

* Defendants also were convicted of and sentenced for other offenses, but they do not challenge those convictions or sentences on appeal.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Raymond Stanza Bowen, Appellant.

Judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered February 7,1968, reversed, on the law, and a new trial granted in the interests of justice. The findings of fact below are affirmed. Although there were sharp issues of fact concerning the circumstances under which defendant was found by the police at the burglarized premises, we are of the opinion that the People’s evidence, which the jury apparently credited, is sufficient to support the conviction herein. Nevertheless, we are constrained to reverse the judgment and to order a new trial in the interests of justice because of the pos*927sibility that defendant was unduly prejudiced by certain remarks directed to defense counsel by the Trial Justice, in the presence and hearing of the jury. Whether or not provoked by counsel, these remarks were unnecessarily personal and harsh and should not, in any event, have been made in the jury’s presence. *“*The development of the facts in the presence of a jury so far as is humanly possible should be uncomplicated by personalities and acrimony” *(Buckley*v. *2570 Broadway Corp.,*12 A D 2d 473). This admonition applies a fortiori to the trial of criminal actions, wherein liberty is at stake. Christ, Acting P. J., Benjamin, Martuscello and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur; Munder, J., dissents and votes to affirm the judgment.
#### In the Matter of T-Jais Pub, Inc., Appellant, v State Liquor Authority, Respondent.

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent State Liquor Authority, made after a hearing, which found petitioner had altered its premises without permission of the authority and suspended its liquor license for a period of 10 days, petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated October 15, 1979, which confirmed the determination and dismissed the petition. Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The determination is supported by substantial evidence and the punishment was not so disproportionate to the offense as to be shocking to one’s sense of fairness *(Matter of Pell v Board of Educ.,*34 NY2d 222). Damiani, J. P., Gibbons, Gulotta and Weinstein, JJ., concur.
EX-31Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications.

 

 

I,Kunal K. Singh, certify that:

 

1.I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-Drequiredto be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of theJ.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Trust 2013‐C10 (the"Exchange Act periodic reports");

 

2.Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, donot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading 

withrespect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other informationrequired to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this reportis included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4.Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in thisreport under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in theExchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligationsunder the servicing agreements in all material respects; and

 

5.All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria forasset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment ofcompliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to beincluded in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation 

ABand Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit tothis report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any materialinstances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed inthis report on Form 10-K.

 

Ingiving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on informationprovided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:

 

MidlandLoan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, as MasterServicer, C-III Asset Management LLC, as Special Servicer, Wells Fargo Bank,National Association, as Trustee and Certificate Administrator, Wells FargoBank, National Association, as Custodian, Park Bridge Lender Services LLC, asSenior Trust Advisor, Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, NationalAssociation, as Primary Servicer for the West County Center Mortgage Loan,Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as Special Servicer for the West County CenterMortgage Loan, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee andCertificate Administrator for the West County Center Mortgage Loan, Wells FargoBank, National Association, as Custodian for the West County Center MortgageLoan, and Pentalpha Surveillance LLC, as Senior Trust Advisor for the WestCounty Center Mortgage Loan.

 

 

 

Dated:March 27, 2018

 

 

/s/Kunal K. Singh

 

 

Presidentand Chief Executive Officer

(senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
#### Wilbur F. Breslin et al., Respondents, v. A. J. Armstrong Co., Inc., et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

In an action to recover damages for trespass, the appeals are from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau Comity, dated December 12, 1968, which denied the motion of defendant Kullman Dining Car Co., Inc., for summary judgment and granted plaintiffs’ cross motion for summary judgment against said defendant and defendant A. J. Armstrong Co., Inc. Order modified, on the law, by limiting the granting of plaintiffs’ cross motion only as against defendant A. J. Armstrong Co., Inc., so that the order will constitute a denial of said motion as against defendant Kullman Dining Car Co., Inc. As so modified, order affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to defendant Kullman Dining Car Co., Inc., against respondents. In our opinion, the proof' adduced on the motion furnished an insufficient basis upon which to summarily impose liability upon Kullman. A question of fact exists as to whether Kullman and Armstrong maintained identical or common interests in the diner after the assignment of the security agreement to Armstrong; or, parenthetically, after Armstrong became the purchaser of the diner at the foreclosure sale. Seemingly, respondents’ • brief tacitly recognizes a distinction between the respective liabilities of Kullman and Armstrong. Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, Rabin, Hopkins and Benjamin, JJ., concur.
§ 74.1 Purpose. ( a ) This part has been established to contain the requirements for the control and accounting of special nuclear material at fixed sites and for documenting the transfer of special nuclear material. General reporting requirements as well as specific requirements for certain licensees possessing special nuclear material of low strategic significance, special nuclear material of moderate strategic significance, and formula quantities of strategic special nuclear material are included. Requirements for the control and accounting of source material at enrichment facilities are also included.
( b ) The general conditions and procedures for the submittal of a license application for the activities covered in this part are detailed in § 70.22 of this chapter.
[50 FR 7579, Feb. 25, 1985, as amended at 56 FR 55998, Oct. 31, 1991; 67 FR 78144, Dec. 23, 2002]
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 788 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
H. Res. 788

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                        March 19, 2018.
    Resolved, That the House has heard with profound sorrow of the death of the 
Honorable Louise McIntosh Slaughter, a Representative from the State of New 
York.
    Resolved, That a committee of such Members of the House as the Speaker may 
designate, together with such Members of the Senate as may be joined, be 
appointed to attend the funeral.
    Resolved, That the Sergeant-at-Arms of the House be authorized and directed 
to take such steps as may be necessary for carrying out the provisions of these 
resolutions and that the necessary expenses in connection therewith be paid out 
of applicable accounts of the House.
    Resolved, That the Clerk communicate these resolutions to the Senate and 
transmit a copy thereof to the family of the deceased.
    Resolved, That when the House adjourns today, it adjourn as a further mark 
of respect to the memory of the deceased.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
1

Schaeffer, John

To: John Schaeffer

Cc: Njo, Heather

Subject: 2524-04-1 HPV 3 EETD review of biodegradation information

EMAIL FOR HPV 3 DOCKET EPA-HQ-OPPT-2009-0112 

John Schaeffer 

Senior Biologist 

USEPA/OPPT/CCD/CITB 

1201 Constitution Ave, NW 

Washington, DC 20460 

Mail Code: 7405M 

Phone: 202-564-8173

From: Lynch, David 

Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2014 6:20 PM 

To: Schaeffer, John 

Subject: RE: Submission of HPV3 Study Plan - 70693-50-4 - #1. 

Hello John, 

I reviewed the information provided by BASF on 2,4-Bis(1-methyl-1-phenylethyl)-6-((2-nitrophenyl)azo)phenol as a 

substitute for Phenol, 2,4-bis(1-methyl-1-phenylethyl)-6-[2-(2-nitrophenyl)diazenyl]-70693-50-4 to meet the Ready 

Biodegradability testing requirement under HPV 3 . 

No measured data for biodegradation were provided, only results from EPISUITE BIOWIN 4.1 indicating that for the 

Ready Biodegradability endpoint, the substance was not expected to be readily biodegradable. I believe, based on the 

structure of the sponsored chemical, that it would not pass a Ready Biodegradability test. Azo compounds, especially 

those with low water solubility such as the sponsored chemical, are highly resistant to biodegradation under aerobic 

conditions, such as those in a Ready Biodegradability test. Based on this understanding I don’t think that Ready 

Biodegradability testing on the substance would provide information we would not have expected based on what we 

know about these substances. I recommend that the requrement for Ready Biodegradability testing be dropped. 

Some azo compounds are biodegradable under anaerobic conditions. Information on the anaerobic biodegradation of 

the sponsored chemical would be useful even though I understand it is not required under the HPV 3 rule. 

Please let me know if you have any questions. 

David G Lynch 

Assessment Branch 5 

Risk Assessment Division 

Mail Code 7403M 

Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxcs 

1200 Pennsylvania Ave NW 

Washington, DC 20460
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
DATA COMPLETENESS REPORT Sep. 12, 2012 Report Request ID: 1018493 Report Code: AMP430

Selection Criteria Page 1 User ID:KHO

State County City

Site Parameter POC AQCR UAR CBSA CSA EPA Region Method Duration Begin Date End Date 06 007 GEOGRAPHIC SELECTIONS

PROTOCOL SELECTIONS Parameter Classification Parameter Method Duration CRITERIA 88101

SELECTED OPTIONS

OZONE EVALUATION AGENCY ROLE MERGE PDF FILES Option Type Option Value SEASONAL-HOURLY REPORTING YES SORT ORDER

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Order Column

EPA_REGION STATE_CODE MONITOR_TYPE COUNTY_CODE SITE_ID PARAMETER_CODE POC GLOBAL DATES

2010 Start Date End Date 2010 01 12 Tribal CodeSep. 12, 2012 UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM DATA COMPLETENESS REPORT



### Page 1 of 3 MONITORS NOT REPORTINGSep. 12, 2012 UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM DATA COMPLETENESS REPORT



### Page 2 of 3 DATE RANGE: REGION:(09) SAN FRANCISCO

California MONITOR TYPE: California Air Resources Board SLAMS JAN. 01, 2010 DEC. 31, 2010

THRU

SITE ID CITY ADDRESS PARAMETER POCDURATION METHOD ------------------------------- OBSERVATIONS ------------------------------- NUMBER / PERCENT
06-007-0002 88101PM2.5 - Local Conditions 1 7 Chico 468 MANZANITA AVE, CHICO 117 4 80% 5 100% 4

80% 4 80% 5 100% 5 100% 6

100% 5 100% 5 100% 5

100% 5 100% 5 100% 58

95% MONITORS REPORTING

JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC YEAR STATE: REP ORG:Sep. 12, 2012 UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM DATA COMPLETENESS REPORT



### Page 3 of 3 DATE RANGE: REGION:(09) SAN FRANCISCO

California
MONITOR TYPE:

California Air Resources Board SLAMS JAN. 01, 2010 DEC. 31, 2010

THRU

PARAMETER ACTIVE MONITORS # NOT REPORTING # MONITORS > 75% MONITORS AVG COMPLETENESS 88101 PM2.5 - Local Conditions 1 0 1 95.0% 1 0 1 95.0% 1 0 1 95.0% 1 0 1 95.0% 1 0 1 95.0% 1 0 1 95.0% California Air Resources Board California REGION SUMMARY:(09) SAN FRANCISCO REPORT SUMMARY: MT SUMMARY:SLAMS REPORT SUMMARY

STATE:

STATE SUMMARY: REP ORG:

RO SUMMARY: