alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 242 (Friday, December 17, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 78979]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-31797]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Navy


Meeting of the Independent Panel To Review the Judge Advocate 
Requirements of the Department of the Navy

AGENCY: Department of the Navy, DoD.

ACTION: Notice of open meetings.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Independent Panel to Review the Judge Advocate 
Requirements of the Department of the Navy (DoN) (hereinafter referred 
to as the Panel) will hold an open meeting. The Panel will meet in 
order to conduct deliberations and may hear witness testimony 
concerning the judge advocate requirements of the DoN. The session will 
be open to the public, subject to the availability of space. In keeping 
with the spirit of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), the Panel 
welcomes written comments concerning its work from the public at any 
time.
    Interested citizens are encouraged to attend the sessions.

DATES: The meeting will be held on Friday, January 7th, 2011, from 9 
a.m. to 12 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Residence Inn Arlington 
Pentagon City, 550 Army Navy Drive, Arlington, VA 22202.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Any member of the public wishing 
further information concerning these meetings or wishing to submit 
written comments may contact: Mr. Frank A. Putzu, Designated Federal 
Official, Department of the Navy, Office of the General Counsel, Naval 
Sea Systems Command, Office of Counsel, 1333 Isaac Hull Avenue, SE., 
Washington Navy Yard, Building 197, Room 4W-3153, Washington, DC 20376, 
via Telephone: 202-781-3097; Fax: 202-781-4628; or E-mail: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#c2a4b0a3aca9ecb2b7b6b8b782aca3b4bbecafabae"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="7e180c1f1015500e0b0a040b3e101f080750131712">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to the provisions of section 506 of 
Public Law 111-84, FACA of 1972, (5 U.S.C. Appendix, as amended), the 
Government in the Sunshine Act of 1976 (5 U.S.C. 552b, as amended), and 
41 CFR 102-3.50, this is a public meeting and interested citizens are 
encouraged to attend the sessions.
    Interested persons may submit a written statement for consideration 
by the Panel at any time prior to January 1, 2011.

    Dated: December 13, 2010.
D.J. Werner,
Lieutenant Commander, Office of the Judge Advocate General, U.S. Navy, 
Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010-31797 Filed 12-16-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3810-FF-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
| (logo) Prudential

  | Prudential Asset Resources,  Inc.

 

**Prudential Mortgage  Capital Company**

2100 Ross Avenue, Suite 2500  Dallas, TX 75201

Tel 877-937-4500

  |
|---------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

Wells Fargo Bank, NationalAssociation Commercial Mortgage ServicingMAC D1086550 South Tryon Street, 14th FloorCharlotte, North Carolina 28202Attention: Asset Manager

RE:**WFRBS 2013-C12**Period:**January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2016 (the "ReportingPeriod")**

**Annual Compliance Statement**I, Timothy E. Steward, in my capacity as President and Managing Director of PrudentialAsset Resources, Inc. (the "Company") hereby certify with regard tothe Company's role as Primary Servicer under the Pooling and ServicingAgreement, (the "Agreement") dated as of March 1, 2013 pertaining tothe above-referenced certificates, that:(i) a review of the activities of the Company under the Agreement during theperiod noted above, and of the performance of the Company under the Agreementduring the reporting period has been made under my supervision, and(ii) to the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Company hasfulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout the reportingperiod.

 

 

Effective as of 2/22/2017

/s/ Timothy E. StewardTimothy E. StewardPresident and Managing DirectorPrudential Asset Resources, Inc.
IV 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 718 

Requesting the President and directing the Secretary of Homeland Security 

to provide to the House of Representatives certain documents in their 

possession relating to the Dubai Ports World acquisition of 6 United 

States commercial ports leases. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 9, 2006 

Mr. KUCINICH (for himself, Mr. LARSON of Connecticut, and Mr. BRADY of 

Pennsylvania) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 

the Committee on Financial Services 

RESOLUTION 

Requesting the President and directing the Secretary of 

Homeland Security to provide to the House of Representatives certain documents in their possession relating to 

the Dubai Ports World acquisition of 6 United States 

commercial ports leases. 

1 Resolved, That the President is requested and the 

2 Secretary of Homeland Security is directed to provide to 

3 the House of Representatives, not later than 14 days after 

4 the date of adoption of this resolution— 

5 (1) all documents in their possession, including 

6 notes from meetings, memos, telephone and elec7 tronic mail records, logs and calendars, and records 


hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
2 

•HRES 718 IH 

1 of internal discussions relating to the December 13, 

2 2005, document by the Coast Guard Intelligence Co3 ordination Center relating to the Dubai Ports World 

4 acquisition of 6 United States commercial ports 

5 leases; 

6 (2) all documents in their possession, including 

7 notes from meetings, memos, telephone and elec8 tronic mail records, logs and calendars, and records 

9 of internal discussions between the White House and 

10 Dubai Ports World relating to the Committee on 

11 Foreign Investment in the United States review 

12 process for such acquisition; and 

13 (3) all documents in their possession, including 

14 notes from meetings, memos, telephone and elec15 tronic mail records, logs and calendars, and records 

16 of internal discussions between the White House and 

17 the Carlyle Group during the period beginning Octo18 ber 1, 2005, and ending March 2, 2006, relating to 

19 the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United 

20 States review process for such acquisition. 

Æ 


hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMBILLS
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 September 10, 2019

b0904

Order 

Clerk

September 10, 2019

158200

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 158200

COA: 335860

Macomb CC: 2013-003648-FC

THOMAS WILLIAM WOOTEN,

Defendant-Appellant. 

________________________________________/

By order of February 4, 2019, the application for leave to appeal the June 12, 2018 

judgment of the Court of Appeals was held in abeyance pending the decision in Gamble v 

United States (Docket No. 17-646). On order of the Court, the case having been decided 

on June 17, 2019, 587 US ___ (2019), the application is again considered, and it is 

DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed 

by this Court.
IV 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 543 

Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 55) requiring 

the President to develop and implement a plan for the withdrawal of 

United States Armed Forces from Iraq. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 9, 2005 

Mr. ABERCROMBIE submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 

the Committee on Rules 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 

55) requiring the President to develop and implement 

a plan for the withdrawal of United States Armed Forces 

from Iraq. 

1 Resolved, That immediately after the adoption of this 

2 resolution the Speaker shall, pursuant to clause 2(b) of 

3 rule XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee 

4 of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consider5 ation of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 55) requiring the 

6 President to develop and implement a plan for the with7 drawal of United States Armed Forces from Iraq. All 

8 points of order against consideration of the joint resolu-
2 

HRES 543 IH 

1 tion are waived. After a first reading of the joint resolu2 tion, general debate shall be confined to the joint resolu3 tion and shall not exceed 17 hours equally divided and 

4 controlled by the majority leader and minority leader or 

5 their designees. After general debate the joint resolution 

6 shall be considered for amendment under the five-minute 

7 rule. The joint resolution shall be considered as read. At 

8 the conclusion of consideration of the joint resolution for 

9 amendment the Committee shall rise and report the joint 

10 resolution to the House with such amendments as may 

11 have been adopted. The previous question shall be consid12 ered as ordered on the joint resolution and amendments 

13 thereto to final passage without intervening motion except 

14 one motion to recommit with or without instructions. 

15 SEC. 2. If the Committee of the Whole rises and re16 ports that it has come to no resolution on the joint resolu17 tion, then on the next legislative day the House shall, im18 mediately after the third daily order of business under 

19 clause 1 of rule XIV, resolve into the Committee of the 

20 Whole for further consideration of the joint resolution. 

Æ
PGI 225.7003-2 Restrictions.

(a)(i) This restriction applies to the item containing the specialty metal, not just the specialty metal,

as was true when the restriction was part of 10 U.S.C. 4862. The previous practice of withholding

payment while conditionally accepting noncompliant items is not permissible for—

(A) Contracts entered into on or after November 16, 2006; or

(B) New procurements or out-of-scope changes accomplished on or after November 16, 2006,

through the use of bilateral modifications to contracts originally awarded prior to November 16,

2006.

(ii) Consistent with the definition of “component” in the clause at DFARS 252.225-7009, a

component is any item supplied to the Government as part of an end item or of another component.

Items that are not incorporated into any of the items listed in DFARS 225.7003-2(a) are not

components of those items. For example, test equipment, ground support equipment, or shipping

containers are not components of the missile system.

Parent topic: PGI 225.7003 Restrictions on acquisition of specialty metals.
exv10w16



 







Exhibit 10.16




[LETTERHEAD OF LAS VEGAS GAMING, INC.]




[Date]




[Name of Employee]




Dear ___________:



I would like to extend this formal offer for you to join LVGI’s management team. As
                     of LVGI, you will be responsible for                                         . Additionally,
as a member of the senior management team, you will be expected to participate in other business
functions including but not limited to,                     . We offer you the following
compensation package:





	 	•	 	                     annual salary.
	 
	 	•	 	                     warrants of LVGI common stock at a strike price of $___, ___% vesting and
___year life.
	 
	 	•	 	Benefits commensurate with other executives at LVGI.
	 
	 	•	 	Minimum of 6 months severance should LVGI decide that it no longer needs your services.




We would like for you to officially report to work on                     . This contract will supersede
all other contracts between us.



If you accept this offer in its entirety, please sign below.




Respectfully,




 




Russ R. Roth

Chief Executive Officer




Accepted this ___day of ___.




By:                                         

     [Name of Employee]
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATIONS

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350



The undersigned hereby certifies that (i) the foregoing quarterly report on Form 10-Q filed by Fountain Powerboat Industries, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended December 31, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in that Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                        |  |     |                               | 
|----------------------- |  | --- | ----------------------------- | 
|Date: February 14, 2008 |  | By: | /s/ Reginald M. Fountain, Jr. | 
|                        |  |     | Reginald M. Fountain, Jr.     | 
|                        |  |     | Chief Executive Officer       | 
|                        |  |     |                               | 
|Date: February 14, 2008 |  | By: | /s/ Irving L. Smith           | 
|                        |  |     | Irving L. Smith               | 
|                        |  |     | Chief Financial Officer       |
§ 75.26 Exemption from IAEA safeguards. ( a ) The U.S. Government may request from the IAEA an exemption from IAEA safeguards with respect to nuclear material of the following types: ( 1 ) Source and special nuclear material in gram quantities or less as a sensing component in instruments;
( 2 ) Nuclear material used in nonnuclear activities; and
( 3 ) Plutonium with an isotopic concentration of plutonium-238 exceeding 80 percent.
( b ) Nuclear material exempted under paragraph (a) of this section must not exceed the quantity limits specified in the Safeguards Agreements.
( c ) The NRC shall provide a prompt notification of an exemption issued by the IAEA to the applicable licensee, certificate holder, or nuclear material outside facilities.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

February 7, 2011 

d0131 

Order 

 

February 7, 2011 

141147(35) 

CARLTON LAMONT BROWN, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 141147 

 COA: 296305 

 

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, 

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s October 26, 

2010 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was 

entered erroneously.
EX-35.3
(logo) usbank
All of us servicing you


Annual Statement of Compliance
Morgan Stanley Bank of America Merrill Lynch Trust 2013-C7

VIA: EMAIL

Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc.
1585 Broadway
New York, New York 10036
Attention: Stephen Holmes
stephen.holmes@morganstanley.com

baml_l7g5requests@baml.com

Re: The Pooling and Servicing Agreement (the "Agreement") dated as of January
    1, 2013 among Morgan Stanley Capital I, Inc. as depositor, Midland Loan
    Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, as master servicer
    and special servicer, Situs Holdings, LLC, as trust advisor, Wells Fargo
    Bank, National Association, as custodian and U.S. Bank National Association,
    as trustee, certificate administrator, certificate registrar and
    authenticating agent

I, Kimberly O. Jacobs, a Senior Vice President of U.S. Bank National
Association, as Certificate Administrator, as a certifying servicer hereby
certify that:

(1) A review of the activities of the Certificate Administrator during the
preceding calendar year and of the performance of the Certificate Administrator
under the Agreement has been made under my supervision; and

(2) To the best of my knowledge and except as described on exhibit A hereto,
based on such review, the Certificate Administrator has fulfilled all its
obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout such year

Capitalized terms used but not defined herein have the meanings set forth in the
Agreement.

Date: March 14, 2014


U.S. Bank National Association as Certificate Administrator as certifying
servicer

By: /s/ Kimberly O. Jacobs
    Kimberly O. Jacobs
    Senior Vice President


(page)


(logo) usbank
All of us servicing you


Exhibit A

Pursuant to the Agreement, the first Distribution Date occurred on February 15,
2013. The corresponding Form 10-D was required to be filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") no later than March 4, 2013. The Certificate
Administrator made a test filing of the required Form 10-D but, due to an
administrative error, did not make an official filing of the Form 10-D on EDGAR.

The Certificate Administrator filed the Form 10-D for the February 15, 2013
Distribution Date with the SEC on March 14, 2014.
Editorial Note on Part 420
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 420 appear at 64 FR 46114, Aug. 24, 1999.

§ 420.33 Application requirements. ( a ) Consistent with § 420.32 of this part, DOE shall set forth general and special project activity-specific requirements for applications for special projects financial assistance in the program guidance/solicitation.
( b ) In addition to any other requirements, all applications shall provide: ( 1 ) A detailed description of the proposed project, including the objectives of the project in relationship to DOE's program and the State's plan for carrying it out;
( 2 ) A detailed budget for the entire proposed period of support, with written justification sufficient to evaluate the itemized list of costs provided on the entire project; and
( 3 ) An implementation schedule for carrying out the project.
( c ) DOE may, subsequent to receipt of an application, request additional budgetary information from a State when necessary for clarification or to make informed preaward determinations.
( d ) DOE may return an application which does not include all information and documentation required by this subpart, 10 CFR part 600, or the program guidance/solicitation, when the nature of the omission precludes review of the application.
[61 FR 35895, July 8, 1996, as amended at 64 FR 46114, Aug. 24, 1999]
§ 5.135 Designation of responsible employee and adoption of grievance procedures. ( a ) *Designation of responsible employee.* Each recipient shall designate at least one employee to coordinate its efforts to comply with and carry out its responsibilities under these Title IX regulations, including any investigation of any complaint communicated to such recipient alleging its noncompliance with these Title IX regulations or alleging any actions that would be prohibited by these Title IX regulations. The recipient shall notify all its students and employees of the name, office address, and telephone number of the employee or employees appointed pursuant to this paragraph.
( b ) *Complaint procedure of recipient.* A recipient shall adopt and publish grievance procedures providing for prompt and equitable resolution of student and employee complaints alleging any action that would be prohibited by these Title IX regulations.
§ 605.2 Applicability. ( a ) This part applies to all grants and cooperative agreements awarded after the effective date of this amended rule.
( b ) Except as otherwise provided by this part, the award and administration of grants and cooperative agreements shall be governed by 2 CFR part 200 as amended by 2 CFR part 910 (DOE Financial Assistance Rules).
[57 FR 40583, Sept. 3, 1992, as amended at 79 FR 76046, Dec. 19, 2014]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

**TIMOTHY RODENIUS AND THE PEOPLE,** 

**Petitioners**

**v.**

**COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA AND CORREALE F. STEVENS,** 

**Respondents :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 92 WM 2015** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 5th day of February, 2016, the Application for Leave to File** 

**Original Process is** GRANTED **, and the Petition for Writ of** Quo Warranto **and**

**Mandamus is** DENIED

**.**

**Mr. Justice Eakin did not participate in the consideration or decision of this** 

**matter.**
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18
- 7213

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. JAZZMYN LITZY, a/k/a Zoe , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia , at Huntington

. Robert C. Chambers , District Judge. ( 3:15

- cr
- 0002 1

- 1 )

Submitted : January 17, 2019 Decided: January 23, 2019

Before WILKINSON and DUNCAN , Circuit Judges , and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Jazzmyn Litzy, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Jazzmyn Litzy appeals the district court ’s order denying h er 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. See United States v. Litzy , No. 3:15

- cr
- 0002 1

- 1 ( S. D. W. Va. Sept. 10, 2018 )

. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
Editorial Note on Part 63
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 63 appear at 81 FR 86909, Dec. 2, 2016.

§ 63.43 License specification. ( a ) A license issued under this part includes license conditions derived from the analyses and evaluations included in the application, including amendments made before a license is issued, together with any additional conditions the Commission finds appropriate.
( b ) License conditions include items in the following categories: ( 1 ) Restrictions as to the physical and chemical form and radioisotopic content of radioactive waste.
( 2 ) Restrictions as to size, shape, and materials and methods of construction of radioactive waste packaging.
( 3 ) Restrictions as to the amount of waste permitted per unit volume of storage space, considering the physical characteristics of both the waste and the host rock.
( 4 ) Requirements relating to test, calibration, or inspection, to assure that the foregoing restrictions are observed.
( 5 ) Controls to be applied to restrict access and to avoid disturbance to the site and to areas outside the site where conditions may affect compliance with §§ 63.111 and 63.113.
( 6 ) Administrative controls, which are the provisions relating to organization and management, procedures, recordkeeping, review and audit, and reporting necessary to assure that activities at the facility are conducted in a safe manner and in conformity with the other license specifications.