UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION Ill 1650 Arch Street Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103-2029

Mr. David K. Paylor, Director Virginia Department ofEnvironmental Quality 629 East Main Street P.O. Box 1105 Richmond, Virginia 23218
Dear Mr. Paylor: 

### MAR 

### 3 12016

On February 1, 2016, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) received three revisions to the Virginia State Implementation Plan (SIP) from the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality (VADEQ). The VADEQ Revision C09 amends Article 53 (Emission Standards for Lithographic Printing Processes) and adds Article 56 (Emission Standards for Letterpress Printing Operations) and Article 56.1 (Emission Standards for Offset Lithographic Printing Operations) to 9VAC5 Chapter 40. The VADEQ Revision D09 adds Article 57 (Emission Standards for Industrial Solvent Cleaning Operations) and Article 58 (Emission Standards for Miscellaneous Industrial Adhesive Application Processes) to 9VAC5 Chapter 40. Lastly, the VADEQ Revision E09 amends 9VAC5 Chapter 20, General Provisions, amends Article 34 (Miscellaneous Metal Parts and Products) in 9VAC5 Chapter 40 and adds Article 59 (Emission Standards for Miscellaneous Metal Parts and Products Coating Application Systems) to 9V AC5 Chapter 40. EPAhas determined that the three submittals are administratively and technically complete and is reviewing themto prepare a Notice ofProposed Rulemaking action.
Ifmembers ofyour staffhave any questions, they may direct them to Leslie Jones Doherty, at (215) 814-3409, or atjones.leslie@epa

. .gov. She is the principal contact for this rulemaking.

Nikos Singelis, Acting Director Air Protection Division

cc: Mr. Michael G. Dowd, Air Quality Division Director Virginia Department ofEnvironmental Quality

CustomerServiceHotline: 1-800-438-2474. SIP Submittedby: Date Submitted: Subject: Completeness Review SIP SUBMITTAL COMPLETENESS CRITERIA CHECKLIST (in accordance with 40 CFRPart 51

- App. V)
Commonwealth ofVirginia February 1, 2016 VADEQ Revision C09, VOC Emission Standards, Printing.

Completed by: Leslie Jones Doherty Date Completed: March 21, 2016


### Administrative Materials ACCEPTABLE 

# I EPAREQUIREMENT 

# I STATE SUBMITTAL

# I~X} 

# I

1. A formal letter ofsubmittal from the Governor orhis 1. Letterreceived February 1, 2016 from David K. Paylor, X designee, requesting EPA approval ofthe plan orrevision Director Virginia Department ofEnvironmental Quality to thereof. David Arnold, Acting Director, Air Protection Director, EPA Region III. 

## 12. Evidence that the State has adopted the plan inthe State code 2. Revision was adopted by the State Air Pollution Control X
orbody ofregulations; or issued the permit, order, consent Board onJune 19, 2015 under the authority ofsection 10.1- agreement in final form. That evidence shall include the date 1308 ofthe Code ofVirginia. Effective date ofthe revisions ofadoption or final issuance as well as the effective date ofthe are February 1, 2016. plan, ifdifferent from the adoption/issuance date. 3. Evidence that the State has the necessary legal authority 3. The amendments were adopted pursuant to section 1 0.1-1185 X under State law to adopt and implement the plan. ofthe Code ofVirginia.
4. A copy ofactual regulation, or document submitted for 4. Copies ofCommonwealth ofVirginia, Department of X approval and incorporation by reference into the plan, including Environmental Quality, Revision C09, 9VAC5-40, Existing indication ofthe changes made to the existing api:>roved plan, Stationary Sources (amending 9V ACS-40-7800; adding where applicable. The submittal shall be a copy ofthe official 9VAC5-408380 through 9VAC5-40-8480) adopted onJune 19, State regulation/document signed, stamped, dated by the 2015, published in the Virginia Register ofRegulations on appropriate State official indicating that it is fully enforceable November 30, 2015 and effective February 1, 2016. by the State. The effective date ofthe regulation/document shall, whenever possible, be indicated inthe document itself. I

I

I5. Evidence that the State followed all ofthe procedural 5. Letter received February 1, 2016 from David K. Paylor, X equirements ofthe State's laws and constitut[on in conducting Director Virginia Department ofEnvironmental Quality to and completing the adoption/issuance ofthe plan. David Arnold, Acting Director, Air Protection Director, EPA Region III. Certification ofPublic Participation Activities. Copy ofpublic notice run onJanuary 12, 2015 in the Washington Times and the Virginia Register. 6. Evidence that public notice was given ofthe proposed 6. The submittal includes a**c~py** ofthenotice ofpublic hearing X change consistent with procedures approved by EPA, including and public commentperiod that was published in the the date ofpublication ofsuch notice. Washington Times and the Virginia Register on January 12, 2015. 7. Certification that public hearings were held in accordance 7. A public hearing was held in Woodbridge, Virginia on X twith the information provided inthe public notice and the February 26, 2015. One person attended the hearing. State's laws and constitution, ifapplicable. 8. Compilation ofpublic comments and the State's response 8. One person attended the hearing and did not offer testimony X !thereto. onthis revision. Twenty nine written comments were received from two commenters during the public commentperiod. The Commonwealthprovided the comments and the Commonwealth's responses. I

# I EPA REQUIREMENT 

# I STATE SUBMITTAL 

# I I .

1. Identification ofall regulated pollutants affected by the plan. 1. The submittal identifies volatile organic compounds (VOC). X**~-** Identification ofthe locations ofaffected sources including 2. The revision affects the Northern VirginiaVOC Emission 

### X the EPA attainment/nonattainment designation ofthe locations Control Area. and the status ofthe attainment plan for the affected area(s). 3. Quantification ofthe changes inplan allowable emissions 3. Not applicable. This revision merely amends Virginia X from the affected sources; estimates ofchanges in current regulations in accordance with requirement of40 CFR Part 51 actual emissions from affected sources or, where appropriate, quantification ofchanges in actual emissions from affected sources through calculations ofthe differences betweencertain baseline levels and allowable emissions anticipated as a result ofthe revision. 

## 14. The State's demonstration that the national ambient air 4. Not applicable. X quality standards, prevention ofsignificant deterioration ncrements, reasonable further progress demonstration, and**~isibility,** as applicable, are protected ifthe plan is approved and implemented. 5. Modeling information required to support the proposed 5. Not applicable. No modeling demonstration was required X revision, including input data, output data, models used, to support the revision. ambient monitoring data used, meteorological data used, ustification for use ofoffsite data (where used), modes of models used, assumptions, and other information relevant to he determination ofadequacy ofthe modeling analysis. 6. Evidence, where necessary, that emission limitations are 6. Not applicable 

### X based on continuous emissionreduction technology.

7. Evidence that the plan contains emission limitations, work 7. Not applicable 

### X [practice standards and recordkeeping/reporting requirements,where necessary, to ensure emission levels. 8. Compliance/enforcement strategies, including how 8. Not applicable 

### X compliance will be determined inpractice. 9. Special economic andtechnologicaljustifieations required 9. Not applicable 

### X lbY any applicable EPApolicies. (Ifa policy is not appropriate, explain why.) 10. A Section 107 request must be accompani ed by a 10. Not applicable 

### X rmaintenance plan demonstrating maintenance to the relevant NAAQS for at least 10 years after redesignation.SIP Submitted by: Date Submitted: SIP SUBMITTAL·COMPLETENESS CRITERIA CHECKLIST (in accordance with 40 CFRPart 51

- App. V)
Commonwealth ofVirginia February 1, 2016 Subject: VADEQ Revision D09, VOC Emissions Standards, Miscellaneous Solvent Cleaning and Adhesive Application. Completeness Review Completedby: Leslie Jones Doherty Date Completed: March 21,2016


### AdministrativeMaterials ACCEPTABLE 

# I EPAREQIDREMENT 

# I STATE SUBMITTAL 

# loo I

1. A formal letter ofsubmittal from the Governor orhis 1. Letters received February 1, 2016 from David K. Paylor, X designee, requesting EPA approval ofthe plan orrevision Director Virginia Department ofEnvironmental Quality to thereof. David Arnold, Acting Director, Air Protection Director, EPA Region III**~.** Evidence that the State has adopted the plan in the State code 2. Revision was adopted by the State Air Pollution Control X
or body ofregulations; or issued the permit, order, consent Board onJune 19, 2015 under the authority ofsection 10.1- agreement in final form. That evidence shall include the date 1308 ofthe Code ofVirginia. Effective date ofthe revisions ofadoption or final issuance as well as the effective date ofthe are February 1, 2016. tplan, ifdifferent from the adoption/issuance date. 3. Evidence that the State has the necessary legal authority 3. The amendments were adopted pursuant to section 10.1-1185 X under State law to adopt and implement the plan. ofthe Code ofVirginia.
4. A copy ofactual regulation, or document submitted for 4. Copies ofCommonwealth ofVirginia, Department of X approval and incorporation by reference into the plan, includingEnvironmental Quality, Revision D09, 9VAC5-40, Existing indication ofthe changes made to the existing approved plan, Stationary Sources (adding 9VAC5-40-8510 through 9VAC5-**~here** applicable. The submittal shall be a copy ofthe official 40-8800) adopted onJune 19, 2015, published in the Virginia State regulation/document signed, stamped, dated by the Register ofRegulations onNovember 30, 2015 and effective !appropriate State official indicating that it is fully enforceable February 1, 2016. by the State. The effective date ofthe regulation/document shall, wheneverpossible, be indicated in the document itself.5. Evidence thatthe State followed all ofthe procedural 5. Letterreceived February 1, 2016 from David K. Paylor, X !requirements ofthe State's laws and constitut[on in conducting Director Virginia Department ofEnvironmental Quality to and completing the adoption/issuance ofthe plan. David Arnold, Acting Director, Air Protection Director, EPA Region III. Certification ofPublic Participation Activities. Copy ofpublic notice run onJanuary 12, 2015 inthe Washington Times and the Virginia Register.
6. Evidence that public notice was given ofthe proposed 6. The submittal includes a copy ofthe notice ofpublic hearing X change consistent with procedures approved by EPA, including and public comment period that was published inthe the date ofpublication ofsuch notice. Washington Times and the Virginia Register onJanuary 12, 2015. 7. Certificationthat public hearings were held in accordance 7. A public hearing was held in Woodbridge, Virginia on X with the information provided inthe public notice and the February 26, 2015. One person attended the hearing. State's laws and constitution, ifapplicable. 8. Compilation ofpublic comments and the State's response 8. One person attended the hearing and offered testimony. X**~hereto.** Three written comments were received during the public· commentperiod. The Commonwealthprovided the comments and the Commonwealth's responses.

# I EPA REQUIREMENT 

# I STATE SUBMITTAL 

# I I

1. Identification ofall regulated pollutants affected by the plan. 1. The submittal identifies volatile organic compounds (VOC). 

### X

2. Identification ofthe locations ofaffected sources including 2. The revision affects the Northern Virginia VOC Emission 

### X I**~he** EPA attainment/nonattainment designation ofthe locations Control Area.

I and the status ofthe attainment plan for the affected area(s). i 3. Quantification ofthe changes inplan allowable emissions 3. Not applicable. This revision merely amends Virginia 

### X from the affected sources; estimates ofchanges in current regulations in accordance with requirement of40 CFRPart 51 actual emissions from affected sources or, where appropriate, I quantification ofchanges in actual emissions from affected I sources through calculations ofthe differences between certain !baseline levels and allowable emissions anticipated as a result ofthe revision.**~.** The State's demonstration that the national ambient air 4. Not applicable. 

### X quality standards, prevention ofsignificant deterioration increments, reasonable further progress demonstration, and visibility, as applicable, are protected ifthe plan is approved and implemented. 5. Modeling information required to support the proposed 5. Not applicable. No modeling demonstration was required 

### X evision, including input data, output data, models used, to support the revision. ambient monitoring data used, meteorological data used, justification for use ofoffsite data (where used), modes of models used, assumptions, and other information relevant to the determination ofadequacy ofthe modeling analysis. 6. Evidence, where necessary, that emission limitations are 6. Not applicable 

### X !based on continuous emission reduction technology.

7. Evidence that the plan contains emission limitations, work 7. Not applicable 

### X tE_ractice standards and recordkeepipg/reporting requirements,**~here** necessary, to ensure emission levels. 8. Compliance/enforcement strategies, including how 8. Not applicable X compliance will be determined inpractice. 9. Special economic and technologicaljustifieations required 9. Not applicable X by any applicable EPA policies. (Ifa policy**i~:** not appropriate, explain why.) 10. A Section 107 request must be accompanied by a 10. Not applicable X tmaintenance plan demonstrating maintenance to the relevant INAAQS for at least 10 years after redesignation.SIP Submitted by: Date Submitted: SIP SUBMITTAL COMPLETENESS CRITERIA CHECKLIST (in accordance with 40 CFRPart 51

- App. V)
Commonwealth ofVirginia February 1, 2016 Subject: VADEQ Revisions E09, VOC Emission Standards, Miscellaneous Metal and Plastic Parts Coating Operations. Completeness Review Completedby: Leslie Jones Doherty Date Completed: March 21, 2016
Administrative Materials ACCEPTABLE 

# I EPA REQIDREMENT 

# I STATE SUBMITTAL

# I(X~ 

# I

1. A formal letter ofsubmittal from the Governor orhis 1. Letters received February 1, 2016 from David K. Paylor, X designee, requesting EPA approval ofthe plan orrevision Director Virginia Department ofEnvironmental Quality to thereof. DavidArnold, Acting Director, Air Protection Director, EPA Region III 

## 12. Evidence that the State has adopted the plan inthe State code 2. Revisionwas adopted by the State AirPollution Control X
orbody ofregulations; or issued the permit, order, consent Board onJune 19,2015 under the authority ofsection 10.1- agreement in final form. That evidence shall include the date 1308 ofthe Code ofVirginia. Effective date ofthe revisions ofadoption or final issuance as well as the effective date ofthe are February 1, 2016. lplan, ifdifferent from the adoption/issuance date. 3. Evidence that the State has the necessary legal authority 3. The amendments were adopted pursuant to section 10.1-1185 X under State lawto adopt and implement the plan. ofthe Code ofVirginia. 

## 14. A copy ofactual regulation, or document submitted for 4. Copies ofCommonwealth ofVirginia, Department of X !approval and incorporation byreference into the plan, including Environmental Quality, Revision E09, 9VAC5-40, Existing indication ofthe changes made to the existing approved plan, Stationary Sources (amending 9VAC5-40-4760; adding !where applicable. The submittal shall be a copy ofthe official 9VAC5-40-8810 through 9VAC5-40-8950); and 9VAC5-20, State regulation/document signed, stamped, dated by the General Provisions (amending 9VAC5-20-21) adopted onJune appropriate State official indicating that it is fully enforceable 19, 2015, published inthe Virginia Register ofRegulations on lby the State. The effective date ofthe regulation/document November 30, 2015 and effective February 1, 2016. shall, wheneverpossible, be indicated inthe document itself.5. Evidence that the State followed all ofthe procedural 5. Letterreceived February 1, 2016 from David K. Paylor, X equirements ofthe State's laws and constitution in conducting Director Virginia Department ofEnvironmental Quality to and completing the adoption/issuance ofthe plan. David Arnold, Acting Director, Air Protection Director, EPA Region III. Certification ofPublic Participation Activities. Copy ofpublic notice run onJanuary 12, 2015 inthe Washington Times and the Virginia Register. 6. Evidence thatpublic notice was given ofthe proposed 6. The submittal includes a copy ofthe notice ofpublic hearing X change consistent with procedures approved by EPA, including and public commentperiod that was published inthe !the date ofpublication ofsuch notice. Washington Times andthe VirginiaRegister onJanuary 12, 2015. 7. Certification that public hearings were held in accordance 7. A public hearing was held inWoodbridge, Virginia on X !with the informationprovided in the public notice and the February 26, 2015. One person attended the hearing. ' State's laws and constitution, ifapplicable. 8. Compilation ofpublic comments and the State's response 8. One person attended the hearing and offered testimony. X thereto. Three written comments were received during the public commentperiod. The Commonwealthprovided the comments and the Commonwealth's responses.

# I EPA REQUIREMENT 

# I STATE SUBMITTAL 

# I 

# I

1. Identification ofall regulated pollutants affected by the plan. 1. The submittal**identi~es** volatile organic compounds (VOC). X

2. Identification ofthe locations ofaffected sources including 2. The revision affects the Northern VirginiaVOC Emission X**~he** EPA attainment/nonattainment designation ofthe locations Control Area. and the status ofthe attainment plan for the affected area(s). 3. Quantification ofthe changes in plan allowable emissions 3. Not applicable. This revision merely amends Virginia X I from the affected sources; estimates ofchanges in current regulations in accordance with requirement of40 CFRPart 51 I actual emissions from affected sources or, where appropriate, quantification ofchanges in actual emissions from affected
sources through calculations ofthe differences between certain baseline levels and allowable emissions anticipated as a result ofthe revision.**~-The** State's demonstrationthat the national ambient air 4. Not applicable. X quality standards, prevention ofsignificant deterioration increments, reasonable further progress demonstration, and !visibility, as applicable, are protected ifthe plan is approved and implemented. 5. Modeling information required to support the proposed 5. Not applicable. No modeling demonstration was required X !revision, including input data, output data, models used, to support the revision. ambient monitoring dataused, meteorological data used, oustification for use ofoffsite data (where used), modes of models used, assumptions, and other information relevant to the determination ofadequacy ofthe modeling analysis. 6. Evidence, where necessary, that emission limitations are 6. Not applicable X [based on continuous emission reduction technology.

7. Evidence that the plan contains emission limitations, work 7. Not applicable X practice standards and recordkeeping/reporting requirements,where necessary, to ensure emission levels. 8. Compliance/enforcement strategies, including how 8. Not applicable X compliance will be determined inpractice. 9. Special economic and technologicaljustifieations required 9. Not applicable X by any applicable EPA policies. (Ifa policy is not appropriate, explain why.) 10

. A Section 107 request must be accompanied by a 10. Not applicable X**~aintenance** plan demonstrating maintenance:to the relevant INAAQS for at least 10 years afterredesignation.