alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7318 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.7318

                     One Hundred Fifteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
           the third day of January, two thousand and eighteen

                                 An Act

 
To amend the Federal Assets Sale and Transfer Act of 2016 to ensure that 
  the Public Buildings Reform Board has adequate time to carry out the 
         responsibilities of the Board, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. FEDERAL ASSETS SALE.
    (a) In General.--Section 4(c)(2) of the Federal Assets Sale and 
Transfer Act of 2016 (40 U.S.C. 1303 note; Public Law 114-287) is 
amended--
        (1) by striking subparagraph (B);
        (2) by striking the paragraph designation and heading and all 
    that follows through ``In selecting'' in subparagraph (A) in the 
    matter preceding clause (i) and inserting the following:
        ``(2) Appointments.--In selecting''; and
        (3) by redesignating clauses (i) through (iv) as subparagraphs 
    (A) through (D), respectively, and indenting appropriately.
    (b) Termination.--Section 10 of the Federal Assets Sale and 
Transfer Act of 2016 (40 U.S.C. 1303 note; Public Law 114-287) is 
amended by striking ``the date of enactment of this Act'' and inserting 
``the date on which the Board members are appointed pursuant to section 
4''.
    (c) Accounting System.--Section 12(e) of the Federal Assets Sale 
and Transfer Act of 2016 (40 U.S.C. 1303 note; Public Law 114-287) is 
amended in the first sentence by striking ``the date of enactment of 
this Act'' and inserting ``the date on which the Board members are 
appointed pursuant to section 4''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

                    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant                           ( print page 80510)                        applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.                

*Name of Committee:*                         Center for Inherited Disease Research Access Committee.                    

*Date:*                         January 7, 2011.                    

*Time:*                         11:30 a.m. to 3 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, 5635 Fishers Lane, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Telephone Conference Call).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Camilla E. Day, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, CIDR, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, 5635 Fishers Lane, Suite 4075, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-402-8837,                         *camilla.day@nih.gov*.                    

This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.172, Human Genome Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: December 16, 2010.

Jennifer S. Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2010-32124 Filed 12-21-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 246 (Thursday, December 23, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 80831]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-32257]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center for Scientific Review; Amended Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the Center for 
Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel, January 3, 2011, 11 a.m. to 
January 3, 2011, 4 p.m., National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge 
Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892 which was published in the Federal Register 
on December 10, 2010, 75 FR 76994-76995.
    The meeting title has been changed to ``Member Conflict: Kidney, 
Nutrition, Obesity and Diabetes and Cardiovascular and Sleep 
Epidemiology''. The meeting is closed to the public.

    Dated: December 17, 2010.
Jennifer S. Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2010-32257 Filed 12-22-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-7445

GLENN V. RHODES,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

PATRICK CONROY, Warden; ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR

THE STATE OF MARYLAND,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, District Judge.

(CA-00-1085-WMN)

Submitted: January 16, 2001 Decided: February 15, 2001

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Glenn V. Rhodes, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Mary Ann Rapp Ince, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF

MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Glenn V. Rhodes appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 &

Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

memorandum and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a

certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Rhodes v. Conroy, No. CA-00-

1085-WMN (D. Md. Oct. 5, 2000). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED
January 26, 2015

Mr. James H. Williams

Unmanned Aircraft Systems Integration Office, AFS-80

800 Independence Ave., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20591

Dear Mr. Williams:

Enclosed please find an exemption application filed on behalf of Douglas R. Dorrer under 

Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 and 14 C.F.R. Part 11 to

allow commercial operations of a small unmanned aircraft system for community outreach, 

aerial surveying of real property, and not-for-profit search and rescue operations.

Should your staff have any questions, please contact the undersigned.

Respectfully,

Douglas R. Dorrer, MBA, Pro Se

204 E. Main Street

Clarksburg, Wv 26301

(304) 629-7077
ME1 19421032v.1

http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=EERE-2014-BT-STD-0031-0002

EERE-2014-BT-STD-0031-0002 spreadsheet Sheet “Summary Switching” - Before
ME1 19421032v.1

http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=EERE-2014-BT-STD-0031-0002

EERE-2014-BT-STD-0031-0002 spreadsheet Sheet “Summary Switching” – Available for download now
#### Katie Daniels, Appellant, v City of New York, Respondent.

[814 NYS2d 258]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Elliot, J.), dated March 23, 2005, which granted the defendant’s motion pursuant to CFLR 4404 to set aside a jury *515verdict in favor of the plaintiff and against it, and to dismiss the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court correctly determined that the plaintiff failed to submit legally sufficient evidence as to whether the defective roadway condition upon which she fell was created through the sort of “affirmative act of negligence” contemplated by *Amabile v City of Buffalo*(93 NY2d 471, 474 [1999]; *see Albright v City of New York,*25 AD3d 577 [2006]). Although there was evidence that the defendant, City of New York, undertook to repair the subject roadway eight years before the plaintiffs accident, there was legally insufficient proof that the defective condition existed immediately upon the City’s completion of the repair work, or that the deterioration of the roadway was caused by the City’s repair, instead of developing over a period of time (see *Lopez v G&J Rudolph Inc.,*20 AD3d 511, 512-513 [2005]; *Gold v County of Westchester,*15 AD3d 439, 440 [2005]; *Bielecki v City of New York,*14 AD3d 301, 302 [2005]; *Corey v Town of Huntington,*9 AD3d 345, 346 [2004]; *Arias v City of New York,*284 AD2d 354, 355 [2001]; *Carbo v City of New York,*275 AD2d 439 [2000]; *Capobianco v Mari,*272 AD2d 497 [2000]; *cf. Cendales v City of New York,*25 AD3d 579 [2006]; *Abreu v City of New York,*14 AD3d 469 [2005]). Because it is undisputed that the City was not provided with prior written notice of the defect (see Administrative Code of the City of New York § 7-201 [c] [2]), the Supreme Court correctly granted the City’s motion pursuant to CPLR 4404 to set aside the verdict in favor of the plaintiff and to dismiss the complaint. Florio, J.P., Crane, Goldstein and Spolzino, JJ., concur.
IV 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 708 

Recognizing the centennial of Christopher House in Chicago. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 2, 2006 

Mr. GUTIERREZ submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Government Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the centennial of Christopher House in Chicago. 

Whereas in 1906, the First Presbyterian Church of Evanston 

founded Christopher House as a settlement house on Chicago’s north side that over a century has grown in response to the needs of people in its community; 

Whereas Christopher House is a catalyst for strengthening 

and empowering low-income children and their families 

by providing a web of support that helps families become 

self-sufficient and resilient and communities become 

stronger; 

Whereas Christopher House served 1,200 individuals in the 

first year of operation, with an annual budget of $4,612 

and now serves about 3,500 children and families with an 

annual budget of $7,700,000; 


wwhite on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 708 IH 

Whereas Christopher House has always welcomed and supported new immigrants, contributing to Chicago’s proud 

tradition as a city of immigrants; 

Whereas today Christopher House is a seven-site family resource center that helps families overcome the consequences of poverty, enabling them to thrive; 

Whereas through early childhood and youth development, 

parent enrichment, literacy, counseling, pregnant and 

parenting teen support, and the meeting of basic human 

needs, Christopher House is a catalyst in the journey of 

families towards stability, resiliency, and self-sufficiency; 

and 

Whereas 2006 is Christopher House’s Centennial Year that 

will be marked by a number of celebrations, including a 

Centennial Kick-Off Open House, the Centennial Gala, 

the Annual Fall Fest, the Annual Holiday Adopt-a-Family program, and Food Walk: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) applauds Christopher House for a century 

3 of contributions to people in need throughout Chi4 cago; 

5 (2) recognizes the past and current employees, 

6 Board of Directors, volunteers, and donors for their 

7 dedication of time, money, and resources to Chris8 topher House; and 

9 (3) congratulates Christopher House on the oc10 casion of its centennial celebration for enriching and 


wwhite on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
3 

•HRES 708 IH 

1 improving the lives of Chicagoans for 100 years and 

2 looks forward to many more years of its services. 

Æ 


wwhite on PROD1PC65 with BILLS
# EUR-Lex - 31971L0144 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31971L0144

**Council Directive 71/144/EEC of 22 March 1971 extending the time limit laid down in Article 10 of the Council Directive of 27 June 1967 on the approximation of laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to the classification, packing and labelling of dangerous substances **

*
Official Journal L 074 , 29/03/1971 P. 0015 - 0015 Finnish special edition: Chapter 15 Volume 1 P. 0144 Danish special edition: Series I Chapter 1971(I) P. 0162 Swedish special edition: Chapter 15 Volume 1 P. 0144 English special edition: Series I Chapter 1971(I) P. 0180 Greek special edition: Chapter 13 Volume 1 P. 0126 Spanish special edition: Chapter 13 Volume 2 P. 0003 Portuguese special edition Chapter 13 Volume 2 P. 0003 *

COUNCIL DIRECTIVE of 22 March 1971 extending the time limit laid down in Article 10 of the Council Directive of 27 June 1967 on the approximation of laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to the classification, packing and labelling of dangerous substances (71/144/EEC)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC COMMUNITY,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community, and in particular Article 100 thereof;

Having regard to the proposal from the Commission;

Whereas the Council Directive of 27 June 1967 (1) on the approximation of laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to the classification, packaging and labelling of dangerous substances, as last amended by the Council Directive of 6 March 1970, (2) lays down that Member States should adopt the measures needed in order to comply with this Directive and apply them by 1 January 1971 at the latest;

Whereas this time limit has proved to be insufficient ; whereas it is therefore advisable to extend it;

HAS ADOPTED THIS DIRECTIVE:

Article 1

The time limit laid down in the first paragraph of Article 10 of the Council Directive of 27 June 1967 shall be extended to 1 January 1972.

Article 2

This Directive is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 22 March 1971.

For the Council

The President

M. COINTAT (1)OJ No 196, 16.8.1967, p. 1. (2)OJ No L 59, 14.3.1970, p. 33.
Subpart 316.3 - Cost-Reimbursement Contracts    **Parent topic:** PART 316 - TYPES OF CONTRACTS316.307 Contract clauses.       (a)          (1)  			If a contract for research and development is with a hospital (profit or nonprofit), the contracting officer shall modify the “Allowable Cost and Payment” clause at FAR 52.216-7 by deleting from paragraph (a) the words “Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) subpart 31.2” and substituting “45 CFR part 75.”          (2) The contracting officer shall also insert the clause at 352.216-70, Additional Cost Principles for Hospitals (Profit or Non-Profit), in solicitations and contracts with a hospital (profit or non-profit) when a cost-reimbursement contract is contemplated.
#### GOODLIFFE, Respondent, v. EHRHART, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

June 5, 1914.)

Action by Frank B. Goodliffe against E. Nelson Ehrhart.

No opinion. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs.
Order entered February 19, 2020

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-00813-CV

EDWARD KELLY, EDWARD KELLY D/B/A KELLY PLUMBING & LEAK 

DETECTION AND BRITTANY KELLY, Appellants

V.

SANJAI R. ISAAC, M.D., REBECCA ISAAC AND MERIDIAN REVOCABLE TRUST, 

BARBARA HEIDEN AND SHELLEY OLIVER AND BLAKE MYERS, Appellees

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 7

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 007-01284-2017

ORDER

Before the Court is appellants’ motion for a fourteen-day extension of time to file 

appellants’ reply brief. We GRANT the motion and ORDER the reply brief be filed by March 

16, 2020.

/s/ ERIN A. NOWELL 

JUSTICE
PGI 215.304 Evaluation factors and significant subfactors.       (c)(i)(A) Evaluation factors may include—          (*1*) The extent to which such firms are specifically identified in proposals;          (*2*) The extent of commitment to use such firms (for example, enforceable commitments are to be weighted more heavily than non-enforceable ones);          (*3*) The complexity and variety of the work small firms are to perform;          (*4*) The realism of the proposal;          (*5*) Past performance of the offerors in complying with requirements of the clauses at FAR 52.219-8, Utilization of Small Business Concerns, and 52.219-9, Small Business Subcontracting Plan; and          (6) The extent of participation of such firms in terms of the value of the total acquisition.          (v) Using authority granted in section 806 of Pub. L. 111-383 to exclude a source based on supply chain risk requires an evaluation factor for supply chain risk, as specified at DFARS 239.73. Evaluating supply chain risk requires review of the supply chain, including all information technology subcontractors and suppliers that are proposed for use at any time in the performance of the contract and may involve the use of all-source intelligence information. The requiring activity is responsible for obtaining any necessary all-source intelligence information and must inform the contracting officer and source selection authority of the results of the review for use in evaluating offers.    **Parent topic:** PGI 215.3 -SOURCE SELECTION
#### KEENAN, Appellant, v. MILK, Respondent et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division Second Department.

January 15, 1915.)

Action by Frank Keenan against Morris Milk and another.

PER CURIAM.

The matters alleged in the “first separate defense” in the answer of defendant Morris Milk do not constitute a defense to the cause of action set forth in the complaint. These matters were provable under the denials of the answer, and it was not proper pleading to set them up as an affirmative defense. Therefore the motion of plaintiff to sustain his demurrer to these matters when pleaded as a defense should have been granted. Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with $10 costs.
# EUR-Lex - 31978R3179 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31978R3179

**Council Regulation (EEC) No 3179/78 of 28 December 1978 concerning the conclusion by the European Economic Community of the Convention on Future Multilateral Cooperation in the Northwest Atlantic Fisheries **

*
Official Journal L 378 , 30/12/1978 P. 0001 - 0001 Finnish special edition: Chapter 4 Volume 1 P. 0031 Greek special edition: Chapter 04 Volume 1 P. 0122 Swedish special edition: Chapter 4 Volume 1 P. 0031 Spanish special edition: Chapter 04 Volume 1 P. 0045 Portuguese special edition Chapter 04 Volume 1 P. 0045 *

COUNCIL REGULATION (EEC) No 3179/78 of 28 December 1978 concerning the conclusion by the European Economic Community of the Convention on Future Multilateral Cooperation in the Northwest Atlantic Fisheries

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community, and in particular Article 43 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the Commission,

Having regard to the opinion of the European Parliament (1),

Whereas the Community has participated in negotiations for a new International Fisheries Convention for the Northwest Atlantic area;

Whereas the Convention on Future Multilateral Cooperation in the Northwest Atlantic Fisheries signed on 24 October 1978 should be concluded by the Community,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The Convention on Future Multilateral Cooperation in the Northwest Atlantic Fisheries is hereby approved on behalf of the Community.

The text of the Convention is annexed to this Regulation.

Article 2

The President of the Council shall deposit the instrument of approval with the Government of Canada in accordance with Article XXII of the Convention (2).

Article 3

This Regulation shall enter into force the day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 28 December 1978.

For the Council

The President

H.-D. GENSCHER (1)Opinion delivered on 15 December 1978 (not yet published in the Official Journal). (2)The date of the entry into force of the Convention will be published in the Official Journal of the European Communities by the General Secretariat of the Council.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

In the Matter of

JAMES RICHARD MURDACO

PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT

FROM ADMINISTRATIVE SUSPENSION

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 124 DB 2020 (No. 81 RST 2020)

Attorney Registration No. 310855

(Bucks County)

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 21st day of October, 2020, the Report and Recommendation of 

Disciplinary Board Member dated October 13, 2020, is approved and it is ORDERED that

James Richard Murdaco, who has been on Administrative Suspension, has never been 

suspended or disbarred, and has demonstrated that he has the moral qualifications, 

competency and learning in law required for admission to practice in the Commonwealth, 

shall be and is, hereby reinstated to active status as a member of the Bar of this 

Commonwealth. The expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and processing 

of this matter shall be paid by the Petitioner.
# MD5 checksums generated by MD5summer (http://www.md5summer.org)
# Generated 7/29/2009 10:36:07 AM

93f4c312bb295160d2b29ab5ac030b67 *ufds1997report.pdf
1441e01fffcdaa895acf3b3bc8fdeaa2 *ufds1998report.pdf
479568f6828dd4265c49dfadc34b628d *ufds1999report.pdf
#### GUY v. REID et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

July 10, 1914.)

Action by Arthur Guy, as administrator, etc., against Joseph A. Reid, impleaded with others.

No opinion. Motion denied, with $10 costs. Order filed.