alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
173176.1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

NORTHERN DIVISION 

RICARDO WRIGHT, BERYL ) 

JACKSON, TRACEY MARTIN, ) 

CALVIN FLUKER, LISA ) 

PITCHFORD, KIMBERLY LOVE, ) 

RESHANDA BROWN, ) 

) 

Plaintiffs, ) 

) 

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO.: 

) 2:06cv785-MHT 

U.S. FOODSERVICE, INC. and ) 

U.S. FOODSERVICE, INC. - ) 

MONTGOMERY DIVISION, ) 

) 

Defendants. ) 

CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

In accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1, defendant U.S. 

Foodservice, Inc.

1

submits the following Disclosure Statement. U.S. Foodservice, 

Inc. is a wholly-owned, indirect subsidiary of Koninklijke Ahold NV (“Ahold”). 

U.S. Foodservice, Inc. is not a publicly traded company. It is an affiliated 

subsidiary of Ahold, a publicly traded company. Ahold’s shares are listed in 

Amsterdam and as ADRs on the New York Stock Exchange ("AHO"). 

 

1

Plaintiffs also named “U.S. Foodservice, Inc. – Montgomery Division” as a defendant. 

However, no such legal entity exists. 

Case 2:06-cv-00785-MHT-WC Document 29 Filed 03/30/2007 Page 1 of 2
2 

173176.1

 Respectfully submitted, 

 /s/ Tammy L. Baker 

 Tammy L. Baker, ASB-9522-B62T 

 E-Mail: tbaker@constangy.com

 Direct Dial: 205-226-5466 

 Tamula R. Yelling, ASB-9447-E61T 

 E-Mail: tyelling@constangy.com 

 Direct Dial: 205-226-5471 

 CONSTANGY, BROOKS & SMITH, LLC 

 One Federal Place, Suite 900 

 1819 Fifth Avenue North 

 Birmingham, Alabama 35203 

 Facsimile: 205-323-7674 

ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT 

U.S. FOODSERVICE, INC. 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on March 30, 2007, I electronically filed the foregoing 

with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system that will send notification of 

such filing to the following: 

Jon C. Goldfarb, Esq. 

Maury S. Weiner, Esq. 

Ethan R. Dettling, Esq. 

Wiggins, Childs, Quinn & Pantazis, LLC 

301 19th Street North 

Birmingham, Alabama 35203 

 /s/ Tammy L. Baker 

Counsel of Record 

Case 2:06-cv-00785-MHT-WC Document 29 Filed 03/30/2007 Page 2 of 2
ex10-44.htm


    EXHIBIT
10.44

     

    
      First
Amendment

      to

      Employment
Agreement

      


      This
First Amendment (the
“First Amendment”) to Employment Agreement is made
this 27h day
of September, 2008, by and between ImageWare Systems, Inc., a Delaware
corporation (the “Company”), on the one hand, and Wayne Wetherell, Senior Vice
President and Chief Financial  Officer of the Company, on the other
hand (the “Executive”).  

                          

      WHEREAS, the Company and the
Executive entered into an Employment Agreement dated as of September 27, 2005
(the “Employment Agreement”); and

      


      WHEREAS, the Executive
continues to perform valuable services for the Company and the Company desires
to assure itself of the continuing services of Executive; and

      


      WHEREAS, in consideration of
the foregoing and in order to amend the terms of the Agreement and to provide
for the continued services of the Executive in accordance with the present
intent of the Company and the Executive.

      


      NOW THEREFORE, in
consideration of the foregoing and for other good and valuable consideration,
receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, and in further consideration of the
mutual covenants contained in the Employment Agreement, the parties do hereby
agree that the Employment Agreement is hereby amended as follows:

      


      Section “2. Term of
Agreement”  strike the
language “continue until the third anniversary of the Effective Date” and
replace it with “continue until June 30, 2009”.

      


      


      


      


      _________________________________                                            _________________________________

      


      ImageWare
Systems,
Inc.                                                                           Wayne
Wetherell
2007-1827.

#### State v. Lothes.

Portage App. No. 2006-P-0086, 2007-Ohio-4266. On motion for stay of court of appeals’ judgment. Motion denied.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Fiscal Service

# AGENCY:

Financial Management Service, Fiscal Service, Department of the Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This is Supplement No. 5 to the Treasury Department Circular 570; 2010 Revision, published July 1, 2010, at 75 FR 38192.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Surety Bond Branch at (202) 874-6850.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Notice is hereby given that the Certificate of Authority issued by the Treasury to the above-named company under 31 U.S.C. 9305 to qualify as an acceptable surety on Federal bonds is terminated immediately. Federal bond-approving officials should annotate their reference copies of the Treasury Department Circular 570 (“Circular”), 2010 Revision, to reflect this change.

With respect to any bonds currently in force with this company, bond-approving officers may let such bonds run to expiration and need not secure new bonds. However, no new bonds should be accepted from this company, and bonds that are continuous in nature should not be renewed.

                    The Circular may be viewed and downloaded through the Internet at                     *http://www.fms.treas.gov/​c570.*

                    Questions concerning this notice may be directed to the U.S. Department of the Treasury, Financial Management Service, Financial Accounting and Services Division, Surety Bond Branch,                           ( print page 81332)                        3700 East-West Highway, Room 6F01, Hyattsville, MD 20782.                

Dated: December 14, 2010.

Laura Carrico,

Director, Financial Accounting and Services Division, Financial Management Service.

[FR Doc. 2010-32299 Filed 12-23-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4810-35-M
Exhibit 31.1

Certification

I, Anderson Y. Lee, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this
report on Form 10-K of the American Express Issuance Trust II (the Exchange Act periodic reports);

2. Based
on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, all of
the distribution, servicing or other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except
as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this
report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated
parties: The Bank of New York Mellon and TransCentra, Inc, (formerly known as Regulus Group LLC).

Date: March 28, 2016



|       |  |                                                                                                                                      
|------ |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|By:    |  | /s/ Anderson Y. Lee                                                                                                                  
|Name:  |  | Anderson Y. Lee                                                                                                                      
|Title: |  | Vice President and Treasurer
American Express Receivables Financing
Corporation VIII LLC (Senior officer in charge
of securitization)
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Emerita Feliciano, Respondent, v. Robert Alexander, Also Known as Robert Fink, Appellant.

Order entered July 16,1969, granting visitation rights to the relator, unanimously reversed on the law and the writ of habeas corpus dismissed, without costs and without disbursements. In this proceeding relator, the maternal grandmother of an infant who is in the custody of her natural father, sought custody or visitation rights. The request for custody was thereafter withdrawn. Previously, the infant’s mother, by written consent, voluntarily relinquished custody of the child to the father, subsequent to the said mother’s divorce and remarriage. Section 72 of the Domestic Relations Law permits a grandparent to apply for a writ of habeas corpus to obtain visitation rights with a child where the parent or parents of such child are deceased. Statements of relator and her counsel *527indicate clearly that the natural mother is alive. There is insufficient to confer authority upon the court to grant the relief sought. Additionally, the record is inadequate to persuade that such visitation would necessarily be in the best interests of the child. Accordingly, the order is reversed and the writ dismissed. Concur—- Stevens, P. J., McGivern, Markewich and Steuer, JJ.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Judicial Conference of the United States

# AGENCY:

Judicial Conference of the United States Advisory Committee on Rules of Civil Procedure.

# ACTION:

Notice of open meeting.

# SUMMARY:

The Advisory Committee on Rules of Civil Procedure will hold a two-day meeting. The meeting will be open to public observation but not  participation.

# DATES:

                        April 4-5, 2011.                         *Time:*                         8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.                    

# ADDRESS:

 The University of Texas School of Law, 727 East Dean Keeton Street, Austin, TX 78705.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Peter G. McCabe, Secretary Rules                               ( print page 81645)                            Committee Support Office, Administrative Office of the United States Courts, Washington, DC 20544, telephone (202) 502-1820.                    

Dated: December 21, 2010.

Peter G. McCabe,

Rules Committee Support Office.

[FR Doc. 2010-32435 Filed 12-27-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 2210-55-M
#### § 706.11 Consent elections.

In accordance with the recommendation of the President's Commission on Labor Relations in the Atomic Energy Installations, it is the policy of DOE to encourage every effort by management and labor at DOE installations to determine bargaining units and representatives by agreement and consent elections in preference to contested proceedings before the National Labor Relations Board.
W.G. TIMMINS


1016-470 Granville Street


Tel/Fax:604-682-5281


 


CONSENT OF AUTHOR


 



	
            To:
 	
            United States Securities and Exchange Commission
 



 


I, William G. Timmins, P.Eng. do hereby consent to the filing, with the regulatory authorities referred to above, of the technical report titled “Geology Report on Carter 1 Claim” dated February, 2006 (the “Technical Report”) and to the written disclosure of the Technical Report and of extracts from or a summary of the Technical Report in the written disclosure in any Offering Memorandum, other offering documents, or an Annual Information Form of Bywater Resources Inc.


 


I hereby certify that I have read Bywater’s Form SB-2 and I do not have any reason to believe that there are any misrepresentations in the information derived from the Technical Report in the written disclosure in the Offering Memorandum, other offering documents, or an Annual Information Form of Bywater Resources Inc.


 



	
            I hereby consent to the use of my name as a consultant to the Company.
 



 


Dated:  July 19, 2006


 



	
            /s/ William G. Timmins  
 



WILLIAM G. TIMMINS
1

 In her supplemental brief, plaintiff requests costs in the amount of $350.00 for filing fees.

(Doc. # 30 at p. 15). However, plaintiff proceeded in forma pauperis in this action and did not pay

the filing fee. (Docs. ## 2, 3).

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

AURORA CLARK, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:06cv779-SRW

) (WO)

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, )

Commissioner of Social Security, )

)

Defendant. )

ORDER

Plaintiff brought the present action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) seeking judicial

review of a decision by the Commissioner of Social Security denying her benefits under the

Social Security Act. On March 5, 2007, this court reversed the decision of the Commissioner

and remanded the case for further proceedings pursuant to sentence four of § 405(g).

Plaintiff has filed a motion (Doc. # 21) for an award of attorney’s fees under the Equal

Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1)(A). Plaintiff’s application seeks

fees in the total amount of $3,613.69 for 22.15 hours of work before this court.1

 The

Commissioner does not contest the amount of the fee sought by plaintiff. Upon an

independent review of the record, the court concludes that the position of the Commissioner

in this litigation was not substantially justified and, further, that an award of $3,613.69 is

reasonable.

Case 1:06-cv-00779-SRW Document 33 Filed 10/30/07 Page 1 of 2
2

Plaintiff’s motion requests that the award of fees be made to her attorneys. Defendant

objects to this request. The court heard oral argument in a telephone conference and allowed

the parties to file briefs directed to this issue. For the reasons stated in Crittenden v. Astrue,

Civil Action No. 2:05cv616-SRW (Doc. # 32), the court concludes that the EAJA fee award

is payable to the plaintiff. 

CONCLUSION

Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for attorney’s fees (Doc. # 21) is GRANTED to the

extent that plaintiff is awarded EAJA fees in the amount of $3,613.69.

DONE, this 30th day of October, 2007.

/s/ Susan Russ Walker 

SUSAN RUSS WALKER

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00779-SRW Document 33 Filed 10/30/07 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 31.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Diana Dimadi, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of AccuPoll Holding Corp.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer(s)  and I are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures,  or caused such disclosure
controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to ensure that
material  information  relating to the  registrant,  including its  consolidated
subsidiaries is made known to us by others within those  entities,  particularly
during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

(b) evaluated the  effectiveness  of the  registrant's  disclosure  controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions  about the effectiveness
of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)  disclosed in this report any change in the  registrant's  internal  control
over  financial  reporting  that occurred  during the  registrant's  most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's  fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has  materially  affected,  or is  reasonably  likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying  officer(s) and I have disclosed,  based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,  to the
registrant's  auditors  and the audit  committee  of the  registrant's  board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions);

(a) all  significant  deficiencies  and  material  weaknesses  in the  design or
operation of internal  control over  financial  reporting  which are  reasonably
likely  to  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability  to  record,  process,
summarize and report financial information; and

(b) any fraud,  whether  or not  material,  that  involves  management  or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's  internal control over
financial reporting.

May 16, 2005                                    /s/ Diana Dimadi
                                                --------------------------------
                                                Diana Dimadi
                                                Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 246 (Thursday, December 23, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 80885]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-32269]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 7275]


Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Rooms With a View: The Open Window in the 19th 
Century''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 
236-3 of August 28, 2000, I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``Rooms with a View: The Open Window in the 
19th Century,'' imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within 
the United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are 
imported pursuant to loan agreements with the foreign owners or 
custodians. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the 
exhibit objects at the Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, New York, 
from on or about March 28, 2011, until on or about July 4, 2011, and at 
possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in 
the national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these 
Determinations be published in the Federal Register.


FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Paul W. Manning, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6469). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, 
Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: December 15, 2010.
Ann Stock,
Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, 
Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2010-32269 Filed 12-22-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
Exhibit 35.1

SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2013-1 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 (the Report), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Santander Consumer USA Inc. (the Servicer), does hereby certify and
represent that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities and performance of the Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of January 16, 2013, among Santander Drive Auto Receivables LLC, Santander Consumer USA Inc., Santander
Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2013-1 and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas (the Agreement) during the period that is the subject of the Report has been made under my supervision.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the period that is the subject of the Report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



SANTANDER CONSUMER USA INC.By:

/s/ Andrew KangName:

Andrew KangTitle:

Executive Vice President Capital Markets
and TreasurerDate:

March 30, 2017By:

/s/ Rich MorrinName:

Rich MorrinTitle:

Chief Operating OfficerDate:

March 30, 2017
# Subpart 803.1 [Reserved]

**Parent topic:**PART 803 - IMPROPER BUSINESS PRACTICES AND PERSONAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST