alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
H. Res. 48 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

January 13, 2017. 

Resolved, That at any time after adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XVIII, 

declare the House resolved into the Committee of the Whole 

House on the state of the Union for consideration of the concurrent resolution (S. Con. Res. 3) setting forth the congressional budget for the United States Government for fiscal 

year 2017 and setting forth the appropriate budgetary levels 

for fiscal years 2018 through 2026. The first reading of the 

concurrent resolution shall be dispensed with. All points of 

order against consideration of the concurrent resolution are 

waived. General debate shall not exceed two hours, with 90 

minutes of general debate confined to the congressional budget equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on the Budget and 30 minutes of general debate on the subject of economic goals and 

policies equally divided and controlled by Representative 

Tiberi of Ohio and Representative Carolyn Maloney of New 

York or their respective designees. After general debate the 
2 

•HRES 48 EH 

concurrent resolution shall be considered for amendment 

under the five-minute rule. The concurrent resolution shall be 

considered as read. No amendment shall be in order except 

the amendment printed in the report of the Committee on 

Rules accompanying this resolution. Such amendment may be 

offered only by the Member designated in the report, shall be 

considered as read, and shall be debatable for the time specified in the report equally divided and controlled by the proponent and an opponent. All points of order against such 

amendment are waived. After the conclusion of consideration 

of the concurrent resolution for amendment, the Committee 

shall rise and report the concurrent resolution to the House 

with such amendment as may have been adopted. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the concurrent resolution and on any amendment thereto to adoption 

without intervening motion. The concurrent resolution shall 

not be subject to a demand for division of the question of its 

adoption. 

SEC. 2. Upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in 

order to consider in the House the bill (S. 84) to provide for 

an exception to a limitation against appointment of persons 

as Secretary of Defense within seven years of relief from active duty as a regular commissioned officer of the Armed 

Forces. All points of order against consideration of the bill 

are waived. The bill shall be considered as read. All points 
3 

•HRES 48 EH 

of order against provisions in the bill are waived. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and 

on any amendment thereto to final passage without intervening motion except: (1) 90 minutes of debate equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on Armed Services; and (2) one motion 

to commit. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
# L_2023179EN.01000101.xml

| 14.7.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 179/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.7.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 179/1

---

Information relating to the entry into force of the Agreement between the European Union and the Federative Republic of Brazil amending the Agreement between the European Union and the Federative Republic of Brazil on short-stay visa waiver for holders of diplomatic, service or official passports

The Agreement between the European Union and the Federative Republic of Brazil amending the Agreement between the European Union and the Federative Republic of Brazil on short-stay visa waiver for holders of diplomatic, service or official passports entered into force on 1 October 2022, the procedure provided for in Article 2 of the Agreement having been completed on 4 April 2022.

---
MEDIATION REFERRALS

The following case has been referred to mediation pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. XIV(6):

2007-2181.

#### Hudson City School Dist. Bd. of Edn. v. Summit Cty. Bd. of Revision.

Board of Tax Appeals, No. 2005-M-1566.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1000 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
H. Res. 1000

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                         July 17, 2018.
    Resolved, That the following named Member be, and is hereby, elected to the 
following standing committees of the House of Representatives:
    Committee on Oversight and Government Reform: Mr. Cloud.
    Committee on Science, Space, and Technology: Mr. Cloud.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Editorial Note on Part 9
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 9 appear at 82 FR 52825, Nov. 15, 2017.

§ 9.200 Scope of subpart. ( a ) This subpart sets forth the procedures to be followed when a subpoena, order, or other demand (hereinafter referred to as a “demand”) for the production of NRC records or disclosure of NRC information, including testimony regarding such records, is issued by a court or other judicial or quasi-judicial authority in a proceeding, excluding Federal grand jury proceedings, to which the NRC is not a party. Information and documents subject to this subpart include: ( 1 ) Any material contained in the files of the NRC;
( 2 ) Any information relating to material contained in the files of the NRC.
( b ) For purposes of this subpart, the term “employee of the NRC” includes all NRC personnel as that term is defined in § 9.3 of this part, including NRC contractors.
( c ) This subpart is intended to provide instructions regarding the internal operations of the NRC and is not intended, and does not, and may not, be relied upon to create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law by a party against the NRC.
[50 FR 37645, Sept. 17, 1985, as amended at 52 FR 49362, Dec. 31, 1987]
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### International Trade Commission

          - [USITC SE-10-002]

# AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING:

United States International Trade Commission.

# ORIGINAL DATE AND TIME:

February 12, 2010 at 11 a.m.

# NEW DATE AND TIME:

February 19, 2010 at 11 a.m.

# PLACE:

500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, Telephone: (202) 205-2000.

# STATUS:

Open to the public.

In accordance with 19 CFR 201.35(d)(1), the Commission has determined to reschedule the meeting of 11 a.m., February 12, 2010 to 11 a.m., February 19, 2010. Earlier announcement of this rescheduling was not possible.

By order of the Commission.

Issued: February 9, 2010.

Marilyn R. Abbott,

Secretary to the Commission.

[FR Doc. 2010-3247 Filed 2-16-10; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
Retirement plans are primarily designed to supplement retirement

income. Withdrawals from the retirement plan must begin by a certain

date and not be postponed indefinitely. You are required to take

distributions from your traditional IRA and other retirement plans once

you reach 70 1/2. This is referred to as the Required Minimum

Distribution Rules.

Generally, participants in a qualified retirement plan or IRA must begin to

receive distributions from the plan by April 1 of the year following the

year in which the participant turned 70 1⁄2. Some retirement plans allow

the participant to defer distributions until they retire, even if they are

past age 70 1⁄2. This option is not available for traditional IRAs. All

distributions after the initial distribution must be made annually by

December 31.

The account balance (as of the end of the preceding year) for all of your

traditional IRA accounts are added together and then divided by the

applicable divisor from the Uniform Table. This is the minimum amount

that you must withdraw. You can always take more than this amount

out, if your plan allows that option. Part or all of the money you withdraw

will be subject to Federal Income Tax. If you do not have any tax

withheld from the disbursement, you may need to make estimated tax

payments (see Publication 505, Tax Withholding and Estimated Tax, for

more information).

Failing to take the required minimum distribution may result in the

assessment of a 50% excise tax on the difference between the Required

Minimum Distribution amount and the actual amount distributed.

Yes, however, if you do not take a distribution in the year that you turn

70 1⁄2, you will need to take two distributions the following year. The first

distribution, which represents the amount for the year in which you

turned 70 1⁄2, must be taken by April 1. You will also need to take the

current year’s distribution by December 31.

Publication 590, Individual Retirement Accounts, contains information on

the minimum distribution requirements and the Uniform Tables. You can

also visit the IRS Website at www.irs.gov. Some IRA administrators will

help you figure your minimum distribution. For complex situations, you

may need to seek the assistance of an accountant or attorney.

Are you an IRA

owner over 70?

What are

the rules?

What happens if I

fail to comply?

How do I calculate

the required

minimum

distribution?

Can I delay my

first required

distribution?

Where can I find

out more about

the required

distributions?

Senior Citizens

Did you know that you can be charged tax on money you don’t get?

Department of the Treasury

Internal Revenue Service

www.irs.gov

Publication 4141 (Rev. 5-2003)

Catalog Number 35631R
# EUR-Lex - 31989R0787 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31989R0787

**Council Regulation (EEC) No 787/89 of 20 March 1989 amending Regulation (EEC) No 1883/78 laying down general rules for the financing of interventions by the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund, Guarantee Section **

*
Official Journal L 085 , 30/03/1989 P. 0001 - 0001 Finnish special edition: Chapter 3 Volume 28 P. 0193 Swedish special edition: Chapter 3 Volume 28 P. 0193 *

*****

COUNCIL REGULATION (EEC) No 787/89

of 20 March 1989

amending Regulation (EEC) No 1883/78 laying down general rules for the financing of interventions by the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund, Guarantee Section

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 729/70 of 21 April 1970 on the financing of the common agricultural policy (1), as last amended by Regulation (EEC) No 2048/88 (2), and in particular Article 3 (2) thereof,

Having regard to proposal from the Commission,

Whereas Article 6 of Regulation (EEC) No 1883/78 (3), as last amended by Regulation (EEC) No 2050/88 (4), stipulates that material operations arising from the storage and, where appropriate, processing of intervention products are to be financed by means of standard amounts uniform throughout the Community; whereas the same rules should apply to financing by the EAGGF Guarantee Section of costs arising from special measures designed to guarantee the utilization and/or destination of products held by intervention agencies for given purposes, such measures being laid down by Community rules,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The following subparagraph is hereby added to Article 6 of Regulation (EEC) No 1883/78:

'Costs arising from the special measures designed to guarantee the utilization and/or destination of products held by intervention agencies for given purposes, which are adopted under the common organizations of the market and the costs of which are borne by the EAGGF Guarantee Section shall also be financed by standard amounts uniform throughout the Community. The standard amounts shall be determined in accordance with the procedure laid down in the first subparagraph.'

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

It shall apply to expenditure incurred from 1 January 1987.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 20 March 1989.

For the Council

The President

C. ROMERO HERRERA

(1) OJ No L 94, 28. 4. 1970, p. 13.

(2) OJ No L 185, 15. 7. 1988, p. 1.

(3) OJ No L 216, 5. 8. 1978, p. 1.

(4) OJ No L 185, 15. 7. 1988, p. 6.
#### VORON, Respondent, v. CHAIT, Appellant, et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

January 15, 1915.)

Action by Isaac Voron against Sabbatia Chait, impleaded with others.

A. C. Cass, of New York City, for appellant. A. Thain, of New York City, tor respondent.

No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Order filed. See, also, 150 N. Y. Supp. 1116; 151 N. Y. Supp. 1149.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Albert Cartagena, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered April 27, 1979, convicting him of attempted manslaughter in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and sentencing him as a second felony offender. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of defendant’s motion to suppress statements. Judgment reversed, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, motion to suppress granted, plea vacated, and case remitted to Criminal Term for further proceedings consistent herewith. Defendant’s confession was obtained after a felony complaint had been filed and an arrest warrant issued. At that point defendant’s right to counsel attached. Accordingly, under the circumstances herein, defendant’s purported waiver of counsel in the absence of counsel was invalid and, as the People concede with commendable candor, his confession should have been suppressed *(see People v Samuels,*49 NY2d 218). We have reviewed defendant’s remaining points relating to the validity of his predicate felony conviction rendered September 15, 1970 (i.e., defendant entered a plea of guilty to the crime of robbery in the second degree under Indictment No. 2696/69), and find them to be without merit (see CPL 10.20, subd 1, par [a]; 170.20; *People v Phillips,*48 NY2d 1011, affg 66 AD2d 696). Titone, J. P., Gibbons, Hargett and O’Connor, JJ., concur.
**Washington**

**Washington 08 Benton**
EPA Registration Number 

69361-2 
1
2

*Proprietary inert ingredient coding may be entitled to confidential treatment
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21

*Product ingredient source information may be entitled to confidential treatment*
22
23
24
25

*Product ingredient source information may be entitled to confidential treatment* *Product ingredient source information may be entitled to confidential treatment* *Product ingredient source information may be entitled to confidential treatment*

*Manufacturing process information may be entitled to confidential treatment*
26

*Product ingredient source information may be entitled to confidential treatment* *Product ingredient source information may be entitled to confidential treatment*

*Manufacturing process information may be entitled to confidential treatment*
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34

*Inert ingredient information may be entitled to confidential treatment*
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46

*Proprietary inert ingredient coding may be entitled to confidential treatment*

*Product ingredient source information may be entitled to confidential treatment*
47
48
49
50
51
52
_____________________________________

Page is not included in this copy.

Pages 53 through 57 are not included in this 

copy.

_______________________________________________________________

The material not included contains the following type of 

information:

_____ Identity of product inert ingredients.

_____ Identity of product impurities.

_____ Description of the product manufacturing process.

_____ Description of quality control procedures.

_____ Identity of the source of product ingredients.

_____ Sales or other commercial/financial information.

_____ A draft product label.

__X___ The product confidential statement of formula.

_____ Information about a pending registration action.

_____ FIFRA registration data.

_____ The document is a duplicate of page(s) _______.

_____ The document is not responsive to the request.

_____ Proprietary information pertaining to the chemical 

 composition of an inert ingredient provided by the source 

 of the ingredient.

_____ Attorney-Client Privilege.

_____ Claimed Confidential by submitter upon submission to the 

 Agency.

_____ Internal Deliberative Information.

 

* The information not included is generally considered confidential by product

registrants. If you have any questions, please contact the individual who 

prepared the response to your request.

_________________________________________________________________
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officers of Longs Drug Stores
Corporation (the Company) hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:



(i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended October 27, 2005 (the Report) fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



|                       |  |  |  |                                                                                 
|---------------------- |  |  |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: December 1, 2005 |  |  |  | /s/    WARREN F. BRYANT                                                         
|                       |  |  |  | Warren F. Bryant Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer                
|                       |  | 
|Date: December 1, 2005 |  |  |  | /s/    STEVEN F.
MCCANN                                                         
|                       |  |  |  | Steven F. McCann Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer



A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Longs Drug Stores Corporation and will be retained by Longs Drug Stores Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-27-1996
<CASH>                                            5256
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    91019
<ALLOWANCES>                                      3832
<INVENTORY>                                     117162
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                236604
<PP&E>                                          121935
<DEPRECIATION>                                   31071
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  363150
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           118615
<BONDS>                                         122838
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           223
<OTHER-SE>                                      102525
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    363150
<SALES>                                         173698
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                173698
<CGS>                                           127763
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   127763
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 43937
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                4024
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (933)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (396)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (537)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (537)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.02)
        

</TABLE>
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

July Term 2014

BRIAN HOOKS,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

No. 4D13-3173

[November 19, 2014]

Petition for writ of habeas corpus to the Circuit Court for the 

Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Cynthia G. Imperato, 

Judge; L.T. Case No. 06-878 CF10A.

Jason T. Forman of Law Offices of Jason T. Forman, P.A., Fort 

Lauderdale, for petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jeanine M. 

Germanowicz, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for 

respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of habeas corpus is granted. See Francois v. State, 

No. 4D14-1558, 2014 WL 5460633 (Fla. 4th DCA Oct. 29, 2014) (granting 

an ineffective appellate counsel petition where counsel failed to request 

certification of conflict or a citation to our decision in Williams v. State, 40 

So. 3d 72 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010)). In the direct appeal, Petitioner’s appellate 

counsel argued that there was fundamental error in the jury instruction. 

We affirmed without certifying a conflict or providing a citation. Hooks v. 

State, 82 So. 3d 905 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011). This prevented petitioner from 

obtaining relief following the Florida Supreme Court’s decision resolving 

the conflict between District Courts in Williams v. State, 123 So. 3d 23 

(Fla. 2013). We agree with Petitioner that it would be manifestly unjust to 

deny him the same remedy that has been afforded to other similarlysituated defendants. See Walden v. State, 39 Fla. L. Weekly D2069 (Fla. 

4th DCA Oct. 1, 2014) (granting habeas corpus where this court failed to 
2

certify the conflict or provide a citation as had been requested by appellate 

counsel).

We vacate the attempted second-degree murder convictions and 

remand for a new trial on those charges. 

WARNER, FORST, and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.