alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000764579
<NAME> CAS MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                           1,530,618
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,024,322
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                        876,241
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,563,302
<PP&E>                                           1,849,839
<DEPRECIATION>                                     930,138
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   4,491,202
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              592,575
<BONDS>                                                  0
<COMMON>                                            37,317
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,163,946
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     4,491,202
<SALES>                                          3,486,465
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,627,274
<CGS>                                            1,411,388
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,383,081
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   271,231
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (64,123)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    625,691
<INCOME-TAX>                                       250,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                375,691
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                       375,691
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          .04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          .04
        

</TABLE>
H. Res. 474

In the House of Representatives, U.S., 

October 6, 2005.

Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall 

be in order to consider the conference report to accompany 

the bill (H.R. 2360) making appropriations for the Department of Homeland Security for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2006, and for other purposes. All points of order 

against the conference report and against its consideration 

are waived. The conference report shall be considered as read.

Attest:

Clerk.
###### Editorial Note on Part 61

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 61 appear at 80 FR 74980, Dec. 1, 2015, and at 81 FR 86909, Dec. 2, 2016.

#### § 61.15 Financial information.

The financial information must be sufficient to demonstrate that the financial qualifications of the applicant are adequate to carry out the activities for which the license is sought and meet other financial assurance requirements as specified in subpart E of this part.
§ 205.199I Remedies. ( a ) A Remedial Order, a Remedial Order for Immediate Compliance, an Order of Disallowance, or a Consent Order may require the person to whom it is directed to roll back prices, to make refunds equal to the amount (plus interest) charged in excess of those amounts permitted under DOE Regulations, to make appropriate compensation to third persons for administrative expenses of effectuating appropriate remedies, and to take such other action as the DOE determines is necessary to eliminate or to compensate for the effects of a violation or any cost disallowance pursuant to § 212.83 or § 212.84. Such action may include a direction to the person to whom the Order is issued to establish an escrow account or take other measures to make refunds directly to purchasers of the products involved, notwithstanding the fact that those purchasers obtained such products from an intermediate distributor of such person's products, and may require as part of the remedy that the person to whom the Order is issued maintain his prices at certain designated levels, notwithstanding the presence or absence of other regulatory controls on such person's prices. In cases where purchasers cannot be reasonably identified or paid or where the amount of each purchaser's overcharge is incapable of reasonable determination, the DOE may refund the amounts received in such cases directly to the Treasury of the United States on behalf of such purchasers.
( b ) The DOE may, when appropriate, issue final Orders ancillary to a Remedial Order, Remedial Order for Immediate Compliance, Order of Disallowance, or Consent Order requiring that a direct or indirect recipient of a refund pass through, by such means as the DOE deems appropriate, including those described in paragraph (a) of this section, all or a portion of the refund, on a pro rata basis, to those customers of the recipient who were adversely affected by the initial overcharge. Ancillary Orders may be appealed to the Office of Hearings and Appeals only pursuant to subpart H.
#### LONG et al. v. LEBANON NAT. BANK et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

June 19, 1914.)

Action by Franklin B. Long and others against the Lebanon National Bank and others.

No opinion. Motion denied. Settle order on notice. See, also, 147 N. Y. Supp. 1123.
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
You havereached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC)Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC.Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of catalogingand locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications.  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the eventthat publications are no longer available from the original publishing agencysite. (Historical purposes)
**Title:Overview of findings from the National Survey on Drug Use and Health**** 
SuDocNumber:HE20.417/5-2:
ItemNumber:0497-D-61(online)
CGPSystem Number:000596835
 
2002
2003
2004
 
 
 **
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, EASTERN DIVISION

CINCINNATI INSURANCE )

COMPANY, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

v. ) 3:06cv733-MHT

) 

JOSEPH DONALD PRATHER )

and LINDA PRATHER, )

)

Defendants. )

 RULE 26(F) ORDER

The parties are reminded of the obligation, imposed

by Rule 26(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, to

confer and to develop a proposed discovery plan.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Rule 26(f) report

containing the discovery plan shall be filed as soon as

practicable but not later than October 18, 2006.

The longstanding practice in this district is that

dispositive motions shall be filed no later than 90 days

prior to the pretrial date. If the parties seek to vary

Case 3:06-cv-00733-MHT-TFM Document 12 Filed 09/27/2006 Page 1 of 3
2

from that schedule, they should present, in the plan,

specific case-related reasons for the requested variance.

In their Rule 26(f) report, however, the parties should

assume that the 90-day requirement will apply.

This case will be set for trial before the

undersigned judge during one of that judge's regularly

scheduled civil trial terms, within 7 to 10 months of

this order if a term is available and, if not available,

then as soon as possible thereafter. The pretrial date

is normally set within four to six weeks of a scheduled

trial term. The dates of each judge's civil trial terms

are available on the court's website located at

<http://almd.uscourts.gov> in the civil case information

section.

The court may or may not hold a scheduling conference

before issuing a scheduling order. If the court holds a

scheduling conference, counsel may participate in the

scheduling conference by conference call.

Case 3:06-cv-00733-MHT-TFM Document 12 Filed 09/27/2006 Page 2 of 3
The scheduling order entered by the court will follow

the form of the Uniform Scheduling Order adopted by the

judges of this court. The Uniform Scheduling Order is

also available on the court's website.

The report of the parties should comply with Form 35

of the Appendix of Forms to the Federal Rules of Civil

Procedure.

DONE, this the 27th day of September, 2006.

 /s/ Myron H. Thompson 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-00733-MHT-TFM Document 12 Filed 09/27/2006 Page 3 of 3
#### § 580.01 Purpose.

The purpose of this part is to implement the authority granted to the Secretary of Energy in section 401 of the Natural Gas Policy Act of 1978, Public Law 95-621, 92 Stat. 3394-3395 (1978).
# L_2023008EN.01000101.xml

| 11.1.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 8/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.1.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 8/1

---

Information concerning the extension of the Agreement on the promotion, provision and use of Galileo and GPS satellite-based navigation systems and related applications between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the United States of America, of the other part

The Agreement on the promotion, provision and use of Galileo and GPS satellite-based navigation systems and related applications between the European Community and its Member States, of the one part, and the United States of America, of the other part, signed on 26 June 2004, entered into force on 12 December 2011
   (1) for a period of ten years, in accordance with Article 20(1) and (5) of the Agreement, respectively. The renewal of the Agreement for a further period of five years, in accordance with Article 20(5) thereof, between the European Union and the United States of America, entered into force on 20 December 2022 and is effective as from 12 December 2021.

1

---

(1)  
  OJ L 348, 31.12.2011, p. 1.

1

---
#### § 605.17 [Reserved]
EXHIBIT 99.2





CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT





I,
Joseph Wallace, Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer of STM Wireless, Inc. (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:





|(1) |  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2002 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 780(d)); and
|--- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




|(2) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the historical financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




Dated: August 13, 2002



/s/     JOSEPH WALLACEVice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
the undersigned officers of Longs Drug Stores Corporation (the Company) hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

(i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended October 25, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                        |  |  |  |                                                                                
|----------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                        |  | 
|Date: November 29, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/  WARREN F. BRYANT                                                          
|                        |  |  |  | Warren F. Bryant                                                               
|                        |  |  |  | Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)  
|                        |  | 
|Date: November 29, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/  STEVEN F. MCCANN                                                          
|                        |  |  |  | Steven F. McCann                                                               
|                        |  |  |  | Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Longs Drug Stores Corporation and will be retained by Longs Drug Stores Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Brian F. Lavin, President of NTS
Capital Corporation, the general partner of NTS-Properties Associates VI, the general partner
of NTS-Properties VI, a Maryland limited partnership (the Partnership), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

|1. |  | The quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Partnership for the period ended September
               30, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
               Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|-- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
               respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
|-- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: November 15, 2004

/s/ Brian F. Lavin

---

President of NTS Capital Corporation,
General Partner of NTS-Properties Associates VI,
General Partner of NTS-Properties VI, a Maryland limited partnership

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Partnership and will be
retained by the Partnership and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
#### § 600.117 [Reserved]
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION

CALVIN FLUKER, et al., )

)

Plaintiffs, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

v. ) 2:06cv785-MHT

) 

U.S. FOODSERVICE, INC., )

and U.S. FOODSERVICE, )

INC.- Montgomery Division, )

)

Defendants. )

ORDER

It is ORDERED that the motion for leave to amend

complaint (doc. no. 17) is granted. The court assumes

that the defendants have no objections to the allowance

of the amendment; however, if they do, they must file the

objection within seven days from the date of this order.

DONE, this the 26th day of January, 2007.

 /s/ Myron H. Thompson 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00785-MHT-WC Document 18 Filed 01/26/2007 Page 1 of 1
Editorial Note on Part 51
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 51 appear at 80 FR 74980, Dec. 1, 2015.

§ 51.91 Final environmental impact statement—contents. ( a ) ( 1 ) The final environmental impact statement will include responses to any comments on the draft environmental impact statement or on any supplement to the draft environmental impact statement. Responses to comments may include: ( i ) Modification of alternatives, including the proposed action;
( ii ) Development and evaluation of alternatives not previously given serious consideration;
( iii ) Supplementation or modification of analyses;
( iv ) Factual corrections;
( v ) Explanation of why comments do not warrant further response, citing sources, authorities or reasons which support this conclusion.
( 2 ) All substantive comments received on the draft environmental impact statement or any supplement to the draft environmental impact statement (or summaries thereof where the response has been exceptionally voluminous) will be attached to the final statement, whether or not each comment is discussed individually in the text of the statement.
( 3 ) If changes in the draft environmental impact statement in response to comments are minor and are confined either to factual corrections or to explanations of why the comments do not warrant further response, the changes may be made by attaching errata sheets to the draft statement. The entire document with a new cover may then be issued as the final environmental impact statement.
( b ) The final environmental impact statement will discuss any relevant responsible opposing view not adequately discussed in the draft environmental impact statement or in any supplement to the draft environmental impact statement, and respond to the issues raised.
( c ) The final environmental impact statement will state how the alternatives considered in it and decisions based on it will or will not achieve the requirements of sections 101 and 102(1) of NEPA and of any other relevant and applicable environmental laws and policies.
( d ) The final environmental impact statement will include a final analysis and a final recommendation on the action to be taken.
###### Editorial Note on Part 32

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 32 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

#### § 32.3 Maintenance of records.

Each record required by this part must be legible throughout the retention period specified by each Commission regulation. The record may be the original or a reproduced copy of a microform provided that the copy or microform is authenticated by authorized personnel and that the microform is capable of producing a clear copy throughout the required retention period. The record may also be stored in electronic media with the capability for producing legible, accurate, and complete records during the required retention period. Records such as letters, drawings, specifications, must include all pertinent information such as stamps, initials, and signatures. The licensee shall maintain adequate safeguards against tampering with and loss of records.

[53 FR 19246, May 27, 1988]
#### § 600.17 Contents of Award.

Each financial assistance award shall be made on a Notice of Financial Assistance Award (NFAA) which contains basic identifying and funding information. The NFAA provides the contents of the award including any special terms and conditions, program regulations, the National Policy Assurances, and any other provisions necessary to establish the respective rights, duties, obligations, and responsibilities of DOE and the recipient, consistent with the requirements of this part.

[74 FR 44276, Aug. 28, 2009]
## LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

ACEEE American Council for an Energy

- Efficient Economy

AEO Annual Energy Outlook

AK Alaska

ANSI American National Standards Institute

Ar argon

ASHRAE American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air Conditioning Engineers

atm atmosphere

At astatine

B self

- ballasted mercury

Ba barium

Be beryllium

BBL blackbody locus

Br bromine

BR bulged reflector

BTU British thermal unit

C Celsius

Ca calcium

CA California

Caltrans California Department of Transportation

CCT correlated color temperature

Ce cerium

CFL compact fluorescent lamp

CFR Code of Federal Regulations

CIE Commission Internationale de l’Eclairage (International Commission on Illumination)

Cl chlorine

CMH ceramic metal halide

CRI color -rendering index

CW constant wattage

CWA constant wattage autotransformer

D Democrat

DOC Department of Commerce

DOE Department of Energy

Dy dysprosium

DyI dysprosium iodide

EIA Energy Information Administration

EISA Energy Independence Security Act

EPA Environmental Protection Agency

EPCA Energy Policy and Conservation Act

EPAct Energy Policy ActEr erbium

ER elliptical reflector

Eu europium

F f luorine

FL fluorescent

fc footcandle

Gd gadodinium

He helium

Hg mercury

HID high

- intensity discharge

HIF high

- intensity fluorescent

Ho holmium

HPS high -pressure sodium

HX high

- reactance autotransformer

I iodine

IC integrated circuit

IDA International Dark

- Sky Association

IESNA Illuminating Engineering Society of North America

IL induction lamp

In indium

K Kelvin

kg kilograms

kPA kiloPascal

Kr krypton

k

V k ilovolt

k

Wh kilowatt -hour

La lanthanum

LA Louisiana

lbs pounds

LCC life

- cycle cost

LCCF lamp current crest factor

LEDs light -emitting diodes

LLD lamp lumen depreciation

LLF light loss factor

lm lumen

Lm/W lumens per watt

LPS low

- pressure sodium

LPD lighting power density

LPW lumens per watt

LRC Lighting Research Center

Lu lutetium

Med Mediummg milligrams

Mg magnesium

MH metal halide, probe

- start metal halide

MHLF metal halide lamp fixture

MI Michigan

MLO Model Lighting Ordinance

Mog Mogul

MR Multi

- faceted reflector

MS Mississippi

MV mercury vapor

Nd neodymium

ND North Dakota

Ne neon

NEMA National Electrical Manufacturers Association

NES national energy savings

NJ New Jersey

nm nanometer

NM New Mexico

NPV net present value

Pa Pascals

PAR parabolic aluminized reflector

PBP payback period

P in power in

Pm promethium

PMH pulse

- start metal halide

P

out power out

Pr praseodymium

quads Quadrillion BTU

R Republican

Ra color -rendering index

Ra radium

RE rare earth

Rn radon

RX reactor

S/MH spacing

- to

- mounting height

Sc scandium

Sm samarium

Sn tin

SnI tin iodide

Sr strontium

SO

x Sulfur dioxide

SPD spectral power distributionTb terbium

TCLP toxicity characteristic leaching procedure

Tm thullium

torr Torr

TSD Technical support document

TWhr terawatt

- hour

UL Underwriter's Laboratory

UV ultraviolet

V v olt

W watt(s)

Xe xenon

Y yttrium

Yb ytterbium
Case 1:06-cr-00201-WHA-CSC Document 50 Filed 03/07/2007 Page 1 of 12
Case 1:06-cr-00201-WHA-CSC Document 50 Filed 03/07/2007 Page 2 of 12
Case 1:06-cr-00201-WHA-CSC Document 50 Filed 03/07/2007 Page 3 of 12
Case 1:06-cr-00201-WHA-CSC Document 50 Filed 03/07/2007 Page 4 of 12
Case 1:06-cr-00201-WHA-CSC Document 50 Filed 03/07/2007 Page 5 of 12
Case 1:06-cr-00201-WHA-CSC Document 50 Filed 03/07/2007 Page 6 of 12
Case 1:06-cr-00201-WHA-CSC Document 50 Filed 03/07/2007 Page 7 of 12
Case 1:06-cr-00201-WHA-CSC Document 50 Filed 03/07/2007 Page 8 of 12
Case 1:06-cr-00201-WHA-CSC Document 50 Filed 03/07/2007 Page 9 of 12
Case 1:06-cr-00201-WHA-CSC Document 50 Filed 03/07/2007 Page 10 of 12
Case 1:06-cr-00201-WHA-CSC Document 50 Filed 03/07/2007 Page 11 of 12
Case 1:06-cr-00201-WHA-CSC Document 50 Filed 03/07/2007 Page 12 of 12
222 So.2d 886

#### Mr. and Mrs. Ignace THERIOT v. TEXAS AND NEW ORLEANS RAILROAD COMPANY et al.

No. 49840.

June 9, 1969.

In re: Mr. and Mrs. Ignace Theriot applying for certiorari, or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of St. Charles. 220 So.2d 563.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal we find no error of law in its judgment.

SANDERS, J.,

is of the opinion that the court erred in applying the “open country” doctrine and the writ should be granted.

SUMMERS, J., is of the opinion the writ should be granted.