alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## CALLAHAN

# & RoBINSON, 

# P.C.

WILLIAM

### P. CALLAHAN wcallahan@callahanandrobinson.com JosEPH

### A. RoBINSoN jrobinson@callahanandrobinson.com U.S. Department ofTransportation Docket Management System 1200 NewJersey Ave., SE Washington, DC 20590 

### ATToRNEYS 

### AT LAw 515 Madison Ave, Suite 2304 New York, NewYork, 10022 Phone: (212)-889-3000 Fax: (212) 889-3242

Re: TwoThousand Fourteen, LLC dba RC Flying Cameras- Petition for 333 Exemption- Request for Confidentiality To Whom It May Concern: This is a follow-up letterto advise that on 07/20/2015 this office filed on behalfofour client below a petition for exemption under Section 333 ofthe FAA Modernization and Reform Act of2012. The name and address ofthe applicant is: Two Thousand Fourteen, llC dba RC Flying Cameras Owner- Martin Hoffman 71 Java St. Brooklyn, NY 11222 Email: rcflyingcameras@gmail.com Phone: 619-851-7347 The following has been submitted via post confidentially to supplementthis public electronic petition: RC Flying Camera's UAS Models/Specs, UAS component manuals, RC Flying Cameras Film's safety manual and certificate of liability insurance for two (2) UASs (DJI Inspire 1 

### & Cinestar 8Hl). tn addW.on, theexhibits end.osed herewith are marked Confidential pursuantto 14 CFR 11.35 (b) as these manuals contain information proprietarytothe applicant which has not and will not be shared with others. The manual contains operating conditions and procedures not available tothe public and are protected from release under 5 USC 552 et.seq ofthe Freedom of Information Act. Exhibits Access To access the corresponding exhibits for the Section 333 Petition from RC Flying Cameras, please go to the URL Below:Ifyou have any trouble accessing these documents, please contact Counsel for RC Flying Cameras (Callahan 

### & Robinson, P.C.) at 888-345-1202 orvia email atjosephrobinsonesq@gmail.com.
Thankyou foryour attention to this enclosure request.

William P. Callahan, Esq.
5301.9103 Solicitation Provision and Contract Clause       Insert a clause substantially the same as the clause at DAFFARS 5352.201-9101, Ombudsman, in all solicitations (including draft solicitations) and contracts.     **Parent topic:** Subpart 5301.91 - OMBUDSMAN PROGRAM
Editorial Note on Part 61
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 61 appear at 80 FR 74980, Dec. 1, 2015, and at 81 FR 86909, Dec. 2, 2016.

§ 61.31 Termination of license. ( a ) Following any period of institutional control needed to meet the requirements found necessary under § 61.23, the licensee may apply for an amendment to terminate the license.
( b ) This application must be filed, and will be reviewed, in accordance with the provision of § 61.20 and of this section.
( c ) A license is terminated only when the Commission finds: ( 1 ) That the institutional control requirements found necessary under § 61.23(g) have been met; and
( 2 ) That any additional requirements resulting from new information developed during the institutional control period have been met, and that permanent monuments or markers warning against intrusion have been installed.
( 3 ) That the records required by § 61.80 (e) and (f) have been sent to the party responsible for institutional control of the disposal site and a copy has been sent to the Commission immediately prior to license termination.
[47 FR 57463, Dec. 27, 1982, as amended at 61 FR 24674, May 16, 1996]
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 245 (Wednesday, December 22, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 80566]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-32136]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice Number 7171]


Overseas Schools Advisory Council Notice of Meeting

    The Overseas Schools Advisory Council, Department of State, will 
hold its Executive Committee Meeting on Thursday, January 20, 2011, at 
9:30 a.m. in Conference Room 1107, Department of State Building, 2201 C 
Street, NW., Washington, DC. The meeting is open to the public and will 
last until approximately 12 p.m.
    The Overseas Schools Advisory Council works closely with the U.S. 
business community in improving those American-sponsored schools 
overseas that are assisted by the Department of State and attended by 
dependents of U.S. Government families and children of employees of 
U.S. corporations and foundations abroad.
    This meeting will deal with issues related to the work and the 
support provided by the Overseas Schools Advisory Council to the 
American-sponsored overseas schools. The agenda includes a review of 
the projects selected for the 2009 and 2010 Educational Assistance 
Program and a presentation on current education issues in the United 
States and their impact on American-sponsored overseas schools.
    Members of the public may attend the meeting and join in the 
discussion, subject to the instructions of the Chair. Admittance of 
public members will be limited to the seating available. Access to the 
State Department is controlled, and individual building passes are 
required for all attendees. Persons who plan to attend should so advise 
the office of Dr. Keith D. Miller, Department of State, Office of 
Overseas Schools, Room H328, SA-1, Washington, DC 20522-0132, telephone 
202-261-8200, prior to January 10, 2011. Each visitor will be asked to 
provide his/her date of birth and either driver's license or passport 
number at the time of registration and attendance, and must carry a 
valid photo ID to the meeting.
    Personal data is requested pursuant to Public Law 99-399 (Omnibus 
Diplomatic Security and Antiterrorism Act of 1986), as amended; Public 
Law 107-56 (USA PATRIOT Act); and Executive Order 13356. The purpose of 
the collection is to validate the identity of individuals who enter 
Department facilities. The data will be entered into the Visitor Access 
Control System (VACS-D) database. Please see the Privacy Impact 
Assessment for VACS-D at http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/100305.pdf for additional information.
    Any requests for reasonable accommodation should be made at the 
time of registration. All such requests will be considered, however, 
requests made after January 10th might not be possible to fill. All 
attendees must use the C Street entrance to the building.

    Dated: December 16, 2010.
Keith D. Miller,
Executive Secretary, Overseas Schools Advisory Council.
[FR Doc. 2010-32136 Filed 12-21-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
#### Cleveland R. ELLIS *v.*Florida EWINGS, Administratrix; Will Annex; In the Matter of Estate of Hazel Tatum Bowers, deceased

07-706

261 S.W.3d 464

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Opinion delivered September 6, 2007

Appellant, pro se.

*Bennie O’Neil,*for appellee.

Per Curiam.

Cleveland R. Elhs seeks a writ of prohibition from this court. He asserts that an order for immediate possession issued by the circuit court on July 24, 2007, and a writ of possession issued on July 25, 2007, are null and void because the circuit court was without jurisdiction to act after he removed the case to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas.

A hearing was set for July 24, 2007, in circuit court on Ewing’s complaint for unlawful detainer. Earlier that same day Ellis filed a Notice of Removal to the United States District Court, and he filed a copy of the Notice of Removal in the circuit court at 3:20 p.m. At 4:25 p.m., on the same day, the circuit court entered the order for immediate possession.

Removal is effective upon filing a notice of removal in both relevant state and federal courts and providing notice to the other parties in the case (Ellis provided notice by mail). *In re Diet Drugs,*282 F.3d 220 (3d Cir. 2002). At that time, the state court *465may proceed no further unless and until the case is remanded. *Id.*A proper filing of a notice of removal immediately strips the state court of jurisdiction. *Id.*Any acts undertaken by the state court after removal are null and void and remain so even if the case is remanded. *Id.*Therefore, the circuit court was without jurisdiction to act on July 24, 2007, at 4:25 p.m., and did not again acquire jurisdiction until July 27, 2007, when the case was remanded from the United States District Court. Because the pleadings show that the circuit court was wholly without jurisdiction to act when the order for immediate possession and writ of possession were issued, the writ of prohibition must issue. *See, e.g., Coonrod v. Seay,*367 Ark. 437, 194 S.W.3d 765 (2006). Notice of filing noted.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-4754

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

ABDI RAZAQ ABSHIR OSMAN, a/k/a Abdirasaq Abshir,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 16-4756

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

MOHAMED ABDI JAMA, a/k/a Mohammed Abdi Jamah,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 16-4758

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,
2

v.

ABDICASIIS CABAASE, a/k/a Ahmed Mahomood,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 17-4274

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

MOHAMED FARAH, a/k/a Mahamed Farraah Hassan,

 Defendant - Appellant.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (2:10-cr-00057-RAJ-DEM-5;

2:10-cr-00057-RAJ-DEM-2; 2:10-cr-00057-RAJ-DEM-4; 2:10-cr-00057-RAJ-DEM-6)

Submitted: November 17, 2017 Decided: December 6, 2017

Before KING, KEENAN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Trey R. Kelleter, VANDEVENTER BLACK LLP, Norfolk, Virginia; Jason Alan Dunn, 

JASON A. DUNN, PLC, Virginia Beach, Virginia; Lawrence H. Woodward, Jr., 

SHUTTLEWORTH, RULOFF, SWAIN, HADDAD & MORECOCK, P.C., Virginia 

Beach, Virginia; Robert B. Rigney, PROTOGYROU & RIGNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for 

Appellants. Dana J. Boente, United States Attorney, Richard D. Cooke, Assistant United 
3

States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
4

PER CURIAM:

Abdi Razaq Abshir Osman, Mohamed Abdi Jama, Abdicasiis Cabaase, and 

Mohamed Farah (collectively, “Defendants”) appeal their convictions and life sentences 

for piracy, in violation 18 U.S.C. § 1651 (2012).*

 We conclude that Defendants’ 

challenges to their convictions and life sentences are barred by the law-of-the-case 

doctrine because we previously considered and rejected Defendants’ arguments in United 

States v. Said, 798 F.3d 182, 193, 198-200 (4th Cir. 2015). See United States v. 

Aramony, 166 F.3d 655, 661 (4th Cir. 1999) (describing law-of-the-case doctrine and its 

exceptions). Accordingly, we affirm the amended judgments of the district court. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED

 * Defendants also were convicted of and sentenced for other offenses, but they do 

not challenge those convictions or sentences on appeal.
H. Res. 627

In the House of Representatives, U.S., 

May 9, 2006.

Whereas Chris Carpenter of the St. Louis Cardinals was 

named the Cy Young Award winner for being the best 

pitcher in the National League during the 2005 Major 

League Baseball season; 

Whereas during the 2005 season Chris Carpenter posted a 

record of 21 wins and 5 losses and an outstanding winning percentage of .808; 

Whereas in 2005 Chris Carpenter had an earned run average 

of 2.83, one of the best in Major League Baseball; and 

Whereas Chris Carpenter has demonstrated an outstanding 

ability to overcome injury and adversity and won the 

Player’s Choice National League Comeback Player of the 

Year award in 2004: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved, That the House of Representatives congratulates Chris Carpenter on being named the Cy Young Award 

winner for the National League for the 2005 Major League 

Baseball season.

Attest: 

Clerk.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>  This schedule contains summary financial
information extracted from Balance Sheets and Statement of
Operations for the third quarter ended September 30, 1996
Form 10Q of Delphi Film Associates IV and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
       
<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                          9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                           SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                 159,000
<SECURITIES>                           894,000
<RECEIVABLES>                          1,465,000
<ALLOWANCES>                              0
<INVENTORY>                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          0
<PP&E>                                    0
<DEPRECIATION>                            0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         2,530,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       0
<BONDS>                                   0
<COMMON>                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                               0
<OTHER-SE>                             2,476,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           2,530,000
<SALES>                                   0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            50,000
<CGS>                                     0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>
246,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           204,000
<INCOME-TAX>                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>
204,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     25
<EPS-DILUTED>                             0
        

</TABLE>
§ 60.136 Preclosure controlled area. ( a ) A preclosure controlled area must be established for the geologic repository operations area.
( b ) The geologic repository operations area shall be designed so that, for Category 2 design basis events, no individual located on or beyond any point on the boundary of the preclosure controlled area will receive the more limiting of a total effective dose equivalent of 0.05 Sv (5 rem), or the sum of the deep-dose equivalent and the committed dose equivalent to any individual organ or tissue (other than the lens of the eye) of 0.5 Sv (50 rem). The eye dose equivalent shall not exceed 0.15 Sv (15 rem), and the shallow dose equivalent to skin shall not exceed 0.5 Sv (50 rem). The minimum distance from the surface facilities in the geologic repository operations area to the boundary of the preclosure controlled area must be at least 100 meters.
( c ) The preclosure controlled area may be traversed by a highway, railroad, or waterway, so long as appropriate and effective arrangements are made to control traffic and to protect public health and safety.
[61 FR 64270, Dec. 4, 1996]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           2,938
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,392
<ALLOWANCES>                                        25
<INVENTORY>                                      4,979
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                11,293
<PP&E>                                          23,906
<DEPRECIATION>                                  11,985
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  24,065
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,992
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            31
<OTHER-SE>                                      10,006
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    24,065
<SALES>                                         37,401
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                37,401
<CGS>                                           28,132
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   28,132
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,751
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 414
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,343
<INCOME-TAX>                                       413
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,929
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,929
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .58
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
###### Editorial Note on Part 55

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 55 appear at 80 FR 74980, Dec. 1, 2015.

#### § 55.9 Completeness and accuracy of information.

Information provided to the Commission by an applicant for a license or by a licensee or information required by statute or by the Commission's regulations, orders, or license conditions to be maintained by the applicant or the licensee shall be complete and accurate in all material respects.

[52 FR 49372, Dec. 31, 1987]
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Ernest Mitchell, Appellant.

Judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered June 21, 1968, convicting defendant of assault in the third degree (2 counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Judgment reversed, on the law and the facts and in the exercise of discretion, and indictment dismissed. In our opinion, it was error to permit Detective Harris to testify as to the complainant’s prior identification of defendant *(People*v. *Christman,*23 N Y 2d 429, 433; *People*v. *Malloy,*22 N Y 2d 559, 567; *People*v. *Caserta,*19 N Y 2d 18, 21; *People*v. *Cioffi,*1 N Y 2d 70, 73; *People*v. *Trowbridge,*305 N. Y. 471, 478); Mrs. Sampson’s testimony of her pretrial identification at a stationhouse show-up four months after the crime while defendant was without counsel should have been excluded *(United States*v. *Wade,*388 U. S. 218; *Gilbert*v. *California,*388 U. S. 263); the People failed to sustain their burden of proving that Mrs. Sampson’s in-court identification had an independent basis untainted by the stationhouse show-up (cf. *People*v. *Ballott,*20 N Y 2d 600, 607); there is a reasonable possibility these errors might have contributed to the conviction *(People*v. *Baker,*26 N Y 2d 169). Since appellant has served his sentence, the ends of justice will be accomplished in this 'case by the dismissal of the indictment (cf. *People*v. *Kvalheim,*17 N Y 2d 510). Christ, P. J., Rabin, Hopkins and Munder, JJ., concur. (Beldock, P. J., deceased.)
#### CERF, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES TITLE GUARANTY CO., Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

November 27, 1914.)

Action by Gustave Cerf against the States Title Guaranty Company. A. Knox, of New York City, for appellant. M. Leff, of New York City, for respondent.

No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Order filed.
#### SULLIVAN et al. v. KRAUS et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

February 11, 1915.)

Action by Patrick H. Sullivan and others against David Kraus and others, as executors.

No opinion. Motion to dismiss appeal granted, with $10 costs. Order filed. See, also, 149 N. Y. Supp. 1114.
#### § 140.4 Interpretations.

Except as specifically authorized by the Commission in writing, no interpretations of the meaning of the regulations in this part by any officer or employee of the Commission other than a written interpretation by the General Counsel will be recognized to be binding upon the Commission.
Editorial Note on Part 61
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 61 appear at 80 FR 74980, Dec. 1, 2015, and at 81 FR 86909, Dec. 2, 2016.

§ 61.3 License required. ( a ) No person may receive, possess, and dispose of radioactive waste containing source, special nuclear, or byproduct material at a land disposal facility unless authorized by a license issued by the Commission pursuant to this part, or unless exemption has been granted by the Commission under § 61.6 of this part.
( b ) Each person shall file an application with the Commission and obtain a license as provided in this part before commencing construction of a land disposal facility. Failure to comply with this requirement may be grounds for denial of a license.
§ 36.17 Applications for exemptions. ( a ) The Commission may, upon application of any interested person or upon its own initiative, grant any exemptions from the requirements in this part that it determines are authorized by law and will not endanger life or property or the common defense and security and are otherwise in the public interest.
( b ) Any application for a license or for amendment of a license authorizing use of a teletherapy-type unit for irradiation of materials or objects may include proposed alternatives for the requirements of this part. The Commission will approve the proposed alternatives if the applicant provides adequate rationale for the proposed alternatives and demonstrates that they are likely to provide an adequate level of safety for workers and the public.
Bureau of Labor Statistics

Series Id:

Series title:

Labor force status:

Type of data:

Age:

Years:

Year Qtr1 Qtr2 Qtr3 Qtr4 Annual

2011 271

Unemployed

Number in thousands

65 to 69 years

2011 to 2011

Labor Force Statistics from the Current Population Survey

Original Data Value

LNU03024938Q

Not Seasonally Adjusted

(Unadj) Unemployment Level - 65-69 yrs.

Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics Generated on: May 16, 2011 (02:10:03 PM)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                             427
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,811
<ALLOWANCES>                                        30
<INVENTORY>                                      3,579
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 6,176
<PP&E>                                          19,874
<DEPRECIATION>                                  10,009
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  16,202
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,585
<BONDS>                                          5,824
<COMMON>                                            30
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                       4,763
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    16,202
<SALES>                                          9,287
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 9,287
<CGS>                                            7,303
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,303
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,572
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 204
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,158
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,158
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,158
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .38
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>