SIP SUBMITTAL COMPLETENESS CRITERIA CHECKLIST (In accordance with 40 CFR Part 51

- App. V)
SIP Submitted by: VA Department ofEnvironmental Quality

Date Submitted: August 30, 2011 Subject: Major Source Permits Revision All (PM2.5) Completeness Review Completed by: Gerallyn Duke Date Completed: November 29,2011
Administrative Materials ACCEPTABLE

EPA REQUIREMENT 

### STATE SUBMITTAL I(X)
1. A formal letter ofsubmittal from the Governor or his 1.Letter from Virginia Department ofEnvironmental Quality X

### ~esignee, requesting EPA approval ofthe plan or revision dated 8/25/11 signed by David Paylor (designee)**~ereof. ~.**  Evidence that the State has adoptedthe plan inthe State code 2.SIP package contains copy ofVADEQ regulations

- Chapter X lor body ofregulations; or issued the permit, order, or consent 10 of9VAC5 Chapter 10 General Definitions, Article 8 of iagreement in final form. That evidence shall include the date 9VAC5 Chapter 80 Permits for Major Stationary Sources and Iofadoption or final issuance as well as the effective date ofthe Major Modifications Locating in Prevention ofSignificant IPlan, ifdifferent from the adoption/issuance date. Deterioration Areas, and Article 9 of9VAC5 Chapter 80 Check to see ifthe regulation, permit, order or consent decree Permits for Major Stationary Sources and Major Modifications Ihas a sunset or expiration date. Ifso it is not acceptable as a Locating in Nonattainment Areas SIP submission. Date ofAdoption: 6/10/11 Effective Date: 8/17/11 No sunset or expiration date 3. Evidence that the State has the necessary legal authority 3. Noted in Volume 27, Issue 23 ofVirginia Register of X under State lawto adopt and implement the plan. Regulations dated 7/18/11. Authority is § 10.1-1308 ofthe Code ofVirginia 4. A copy ofactual regulation, or document submitted for 4. Copy ofregulation showing changes and effective date isEPA REQUIREMENT 

### STATE SUBMITTAL 

## 100 approval and incorporation by reference into the plan, including included in submittal X indication ofthe changes made to the existing approved plan, where applicable. The submittal shall be a copy ofthe official State regulation/document signed, stamped, dated by the appropriate State official indicating that it is fully enforceable by the State. The effective date ofthe regulation/document**~hall,** whenever possible, be indicated inthe document itself. 5. Evidence that the State followed all ofthe procedural 5. Certification ofcompliance with state administrative X equirements ofthe State's laws and constitution in conducting procedures is provided. Copy ofpublic hearing notice and**~d** completing the adoption/issuance ofthe plan. certification ofpublic participation activities are provided.**~.** Evidence that public notice was given oftheproposed 6. Notice ofpublic hearing and public comment period was X change consistent with procedures approved by EPA, including published inthe Virginia Register ofRegulations onJuly 18, the date ofpublication ofsuch notice. 2011. 'r]. Certification that public hearings were held in accordance 7. Certification ofPublic Participation Activities states that the X**~th** the information provided inthe public notice and the public notice included procedures to afford the public the State's laws and constitution, ifapplicable. opportunity to requestthat a hearing be held and that no such request was received. 8. Compilation ofpublic comments and the State's response 8. Public Participation Record is provided and states that the X Ithereto. state did not receive testimony onthis revision. Technical Materials 1. Identification ofall regulated pollutants affected by the plan. 1. Regulations regarding particulate matter less than 2.5 X micrometers (PM2.5) as regulated new source review (NSR) pollutants**~.** Identification ofthe locations ofaffected sources including 2.Major Stationary Sources and Major Modifications Locating Ithe EPA attainmentlnonattainment designation ofthe locations in Prevention ofSignificant Deterioration Areas and in X**~d** the status ofthe attainment plan for the affected area(s). Nonattainment Areas**~.** Quantification ofthe changes inplan allowable emissions 

### 3.N/A X !from the affected sources; estimates ofchanges in current**~ctual** emissions from affected sources or, where appropriate, quantification ofchanges in actual emissions from affected sources through calculations ofthe differences between certainEPA REQUIREMENT STATE 

### SUBMITTAL· 

# i(X) baseline levels and allowable emissions anticipated as a result ofthe revision. 4. The State's demonstration that the national ambient air 4. The revised SIP should be the same as or equivalent to the X quality standards, prevention ofsignificant deterioration revised federal NSR and PSD permitting programs which,

.ncrements, reasonable further progress demonstration, and among otherthings, are intended to protect theNAAQS for visibility, as applicable, are protected ifthe plan is approved PM2.S and the increment for PM2.S. The regulations will and implemented. enhance the current approved program in Virginia. S. Modeling information required to support the proposed S.N/A X evision, including input data, output data, models used, ambient monitoring dataused, meteorological data used, ustification for use ofoffsite data (where used), modes of models used, assumptions, and other information relevantto the determination ofadequacy ofthe modeling analysis.
6. Evidence, where necessary, that emission limitations are 6.N/A X based on continuous emission reduction technology. 7. Evidence that the plan contains emission limitations, work 7.N/A X practice standards and recordkeeping/reporting requirements, where necessary, to ensure emission levels. 8. Compliance/enforcement strategies, including how 8.N/A X compliance will be determined inpractice. 9. Special economic and technologicaljustifications required 9. No economic impact is seen and this addition will bring VA X by any applicable EPApolicies. (Ifa policy is not appropriate, DEQ regulations to be consistent with the Federal program. explain why.) This will also fulfill a needed in the program which was represented in a Federal Registernotice dated May 16,2008- 73 FR28321 10. A Section 107 request must be accompanied by a 10. N/A X maintenance plan demonstrating maintenance to the relevant NAAQS for at least 10 years after redesignation.