alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
REGISTRANT'S 10-QSB AS FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         308,563
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,566,485
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (667,644)
<INVENTORY>                                    176,340
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,743,908
<PP&E>                                       2,930,433
<DEPRECIATION>                             (2,304,853)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            (11,155,399)
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        6,046,427
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       396,408
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,550,628
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,155,399
<SALES>                                      1,507,618
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,507,618
<CGS>                                        1,199,935
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,168,910
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                15,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             202,310
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,058,937)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (2,058,937)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,058,937)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.53)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.53)


</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. No. 97-4038 WILLIAM STOOTS, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (CR-96-234-CCB) Submitted: October 31, 1997 Decided: November 20, 1997 Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

_________________________________________________________________ Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

_________________________________________________________________ COUNSEL J. Richard Moore, III, Bel Air, Maryland, for Appellant. Lynne A. Battaglia, United States Attorney, Thomas M. DiBiagio, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________ Unpublished opinions are not binding pr ecedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).OPINION PER CURIAM: William Stoots was convicted by the magistrate judge of assault by striking within the maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States, in violation of 18 U.S.C.A. § 113(a)(4) (West Supp. 1997). He was sentenced to three years probation with sixty days at a residential community treatment center, and ordered to pay restitution. On appeal, the district court held the evidence sufficient to support the magistrate judge's conclusion that Stoots did not act in self-defense, and the sentence to be legal and reasonable. Stoots appeals. Stoots argues that he did not use excessive force in reacting to the conduct of a coworker at the Aberdeen Proving Ground. He assertsthe magistrate judge improperly failed to find that Stoots acted in selfdefense. We uphold the sufficiency of the evidence to support a convictionif, viewing the evidence and the inferences reasonably drawn therefrom in the light most favorable to the Government, a reasonable trier of fact could have found guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. United States v. Rahman , 83 F.3d 89, 93 (4th Cir.), cert. denied , ___ U.S. ___, 65 U.S.L.W. 3369 (U.S., Nov. 18, 1996) (No. 93-6343). Here, the magistrate judge found, even accepting Stoots's version of events,that the force Stoots used was much more than would have been necessary to defend himself in the situation. It is the role of the factfinder, rather than the appellate court, to resolve conflicting testimony, weigh the evidence, and judge the credibility of witnesses. United States v. Manbeck , 744 F.2d 360, 392 (4th Cir. 1984). Therefore, we conclude that Stoots's conviction is supported by sufficient evidence. We affirm the conviction and sentence. We dispense with oralargument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q
FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                          14,797
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     54,917
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          52,221
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        239,166
<ALLOWANCE>                                      2,562
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 371,881
<DEPOSITS>                                     304,743
<SHORT-TERM>                                    21,307
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              3,632
<LONG-TERM>                                      7,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         9,147
<OTHER-SE>                                      26,052
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 371,881
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 10,057
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                3,183
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    51
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                13,291
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               5,241
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,659
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            7,632
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      160
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               7,472
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  5,816
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,361
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       3,361
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,346
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .64
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .62
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.49
<LOANS-NON>                                        558
<LOANS-PAST>                                       655
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 2,517
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      181
<RECOVERIES>                                        66
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                2,562
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             2,263
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            299


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

                Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant
                 to 8 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to
                 Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

                                  CERTIFICATION

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Water Chef, Inc., a Delaware
corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30,
2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), the undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer, hereby certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge and upon a review of the Report
that:

     (1) the Report of the Company filed today pursuant to Section 13(a) of the
     Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), fully
     complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act; and

     (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.

This certification is based upon, among other things, my responsibilities as
Chief Executive Officer, my own due diligence and representations made by
certain members of the Company's senior management.

Dated: November 19, 2007
                                            /s/  Leslie J. Kessler
                                            -----------------------------------
                                                 Leslie J. Kessler
                                                 President and
                                                 Chief Executive Officer
IV 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 476 

Recognizing the 50th anniversary of the Brooklyn Dodgers victory over the 

New York Yankees in the World Series. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 29, 2005 

Mr. KING of New York (for himself and Mr. TOWNS) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Government Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the 50th anniversary of the Brooklyn Dodgers 

victory over the New York Yankees in the World Series. 

Whereas on October 4, 1955, the Brooklyn Dodgers defeated 

the New York Yankees in Game 7 of the World Series 

at Yankee Stadium in Bronx, New York, to become 

World Champions; 

Whereas the victory was the first World Series Championship 

in the history of the Dodgers franchise; 

Whereas the Brooklyn Dodgers baseball franchise was a pioneer in the integration of Major League Baseball; 

Whereas the Dodgers were led by such legends as Jackie 

Robinson, Gil Hodges, Pee Wee Reese, Roy Campanella, 

Duke Snider, Don Newcombe, and Carl Furillo; 
2 

•HRES 476 IH 

Whereas Duke Snider became the first Major League baseball player to hit four home runs in two World Series; 

Whereas Hall of Fame Manager Walter Alston provided the 

outstanding leadership and strategy needed to lead the 

Dodgers to 98 wins during the 1955 regular season; and 

Whereas by pitching his team to victory in Games 3 and 7, 

Johnny Podres was named Most Valuable Player of the 

1955 World Series: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives recog2 nizes the achievements of the remarkable Major League 

3 Baseball World Championship season of the 1955 Brook4 lyn Dodgers. 

Æ
226 So.2d 518

#### STATE of Louisiana v. Thomas BETHELL.

No. 49970.

Sept. 29, 1969.

In re: State of Louisiana applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition and mandamus.

Writs refused. The ruling complained of is correct.
### Influence of forest management on headwater stream amphibians at multiple spatial scales

By: Margo StoddardJohn P. HayesJanet L. Erickson

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/fs20043018

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (1070 pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
#### State of Kansas, *Appellant,*v. Mike Hennington, *Appellee.*

No. 47,802

Opinion filed November 8, 1975.

*Curt T. Schneider,*attorney general, *Margaret*W. *Jordan,*district attorney and *Richard S. Wetzler,*assistant district attorney, of Olathe, were on the brief for appellant.

*Hugh H. Kraemer*and *Thomas E. Ruzicka,*of Breyfogle, Gardner, Martin, Davis & Kraemer, of Olathe, were on the brief for appellee.

*Per Curiam:*

Reversed and remanded.

Miller, J., not participating.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATIONS
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

The undersigned hereby certifies that (i) the foregoing quarterly
report on Form 10-Q filed by Fountain Powerboat Industries, Inc.
(the "Company") for the quarter ended March 31, 2004, fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information
contained in that Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.


Date:  May 14, 2004          /s/Reginald M. Fountain, Jr.
                                Reginald M. Fountain, Jr.
                                President and Chief Executive Officer



Date:  May 14, 2004          /s/ Irving L. Smith
                                 Irving L. Smith
                                 Chief Financial Officer
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Eddie Purvis, Appellant.

Judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered June 4, 1965 on resentence and order of the same court, dated June 12, 1965, affirmed. We find no merit to the claim that the Supreme Court lacked jurisdiction to resentence the defendant. We also find no merit to the claim that an arrest of judgment can be based on the failure to advise a defendant that a felony conviction may result in greater punishment if another felony is committed at a future date. Christ, P. J., Rabin, Hopkins and Munder, JJ., concur. (Beldock, P. J., deceased.)
#### § 490.306 Vehicle operation requirements.

The alternative fueled vehicles acquired pursuant to section 490.302 of this part shall be operated solely on alternative fuels, except when these vehicles are operating in an area where the appropriate alternative fuel is unavailable.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. John McCutcheon, Appellant.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County, rendered January 16, 1968, convicting defendant of burglary in the third degree and grand larceny in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Judgment reversed, on the law, and new trial ordered. The findings of fact below are affirmed. At defendant’s trial the People proved that an apartment had been burgled and that from it had been taken a television set, a radio and a sum of money. Through one Neilson the People attempted to prove that defendant was one of the burglars. Neilson testified, in substance, that defendant and one Carroll had asked Neilson to help Carroll move his belongings and, with that innocent purpose in mind, as well as the prospect of receiving a few dollars, Neilson drove them at their direction to an address given by Carroll. There, defendant and Carroll entered a building, leaving Neilson in the ear. Defendant returned with a radio. At defendant’s request, Neilson, wearing a light tan trench coat, carried a television set to his car from a point in front of the hallway door of an apartment. On defendant’s and Carroll’s claim that they lacked identification papers, and Carroll’s statement that he needed money to pay his rent, Neilson pawned the radio and television set for $40, giving his true name and address and thereafter accepting from Carroll $13. Two witnesses, White and Cowan, in sum testified that, at the time and place of the burglary, they saw a car and three men in front of the address of the burglarized apartment. One of the men, wearing a light tan trench coat and carrying a television sfet to the car, hid his face from their view. The license number of the ear, noted by White, was traced to Neilson’s mother. Both White and Cowan, however, were unable to identify any of the men. In our opinion, it was reversible error for the trial court to have left it *to*the jury to say whether Neilson’s testimony had been corroborated by that of White and Cowan.- Nothing in the testimony of White and Cowan constitutes evidence of a material fact tending to' show that defendant was implicated in the crime *(People*v. *Kress,*
      *940284 N. Y. 452). At best, their testimony tends to show that the crime was committed in the manner described by Neil son. Hence, their evidence tended only to support the credibility of Neilson, was therefore insufficient as a matter of law for the purpose of corroboration, and should not have been submitted to the jury *(People*v. *Fiore,*12 N Y 2d 188; *People*v. *Maione,*284 N. Y. 423; *People*v. *O’Farrell,*175 N. Y. 323; see *People*v. *Kress, supra,*p. 465). Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, Rabin, Hopkins and Munder, JJ., concur.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CASE NO. 2:06-cv-736-WKW

)

SEVENTY-FOUR THOUSAND SEVEN )

HUNDRED DOLLARS ($74,700) IN )

UNITED STATES CURRENCY, )

)

Defendant. )

ORDER

The Motion to Suppress (Doc. # 15) is set for hearing June 26, 2007, at 2:00 p.m. in

Courtroom 2E of the Frank M. Johnson, Jr. U. S. Courthouse Complex, One Church Street,

Montgomery, Alabama.

DONE this 25th day of May, 2007.

 /s/ W. Keith Watkins 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00736-WKW-SRW Document 19 Filed 05/25/2007 Page 1 of 1
PGI 232.410 Findings, determination, and authorization.       If an advance payment procedure is used without a special bank account, replace paragraph (a)(4) of the Findings, Determination, and Authorization for Advance Payments at FAR 32.410 with:          “(4) The proposed advance payment clause contains appropriate provisions as security for advance payments. These provisions include a requirement that the outstanding advance payments will be liquidated from cost reimbursements as they become due the contractor. This security is considered adequate to protect the interest of the Government.”    **Parent topic:** PGI 232.4 -ADVANCE PAYMENTS FOR OTHER THAN COMMERCIAL ACQUISITIONS
```

[109th Congress Public Law 311]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ311.109]

[[Page 120 STAT. 1729]]

Public Law 109-311
109th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
   2951 New York Highway 43 in Averill Park, New York, as the ``Major 
    George Quamo Post Office Building''. <<NOTE: Oct. 6, 2006 -  [S. 
                                3613]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MAJOR GEORGE QUAMO POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 2951 New York Highway 43 in Averill Park, New York, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Major George Quamo Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Major 
George Quamo Post Office Building''.

    Approved October 6, 2006.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--S. 3613:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 152 (2006):
            Aug. 2, considered and passed Senate.
            Sept. 28, considered and passed House.

                                  <all>
```
Exhibit 32

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


The undersigned  hereby certify  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that the quarterly
report of United States Basketball League, Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly
period ended November 30, 2006 fully complies with the  requirements  of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 and that the  information
contained  in such  quarterly  report  on Form  10-QSB  fairly  presents  in all
material  respects the  financial  condition  and results of operation of United
States Basketball League, Inc.


Date: January 22, 2007


/s/Daniel T. Meisenheimer, III
--------------------------------
Daniel T. Meisenheimer, III
President

Date: January 22, 2007


/s/Richard C. Meisenheimer
--------------------------------
Richard C. Meisenheimer
Chief Financial Officer
#### § 52.156 Contents of applications; general information.

The application must contain all of the information required by 10 CFR 50.33(a) through (d), and (j).