alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[109th Congress Public Law 302]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ302.109]

[[Page 120 STAT. 1477]]

Public Law 109-302
109th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
 8801 Sudley Road in Manassas, Virginia, as the ``Harry J. Parrish Post 
             Office''. <<NOTE: Oct. 5, 2006 -  [S. 2690]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. HARRY J. PARRISH POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 8801 Sudley Road, Manassas, Virginia, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Harry J. Parrish Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the Harry J. 
Parrish Post Office.

    Approved October 5, 2006.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--S. 2690:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 152 (2006):
            July 20, considered and passed Senate.
            Sept. 25, considered and passed House.

                                  <all>
```
Editorial Note on Part 61
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 61 appear at 80 FR 74980, Dec. 1, 2015, and at 81 FR 86909, Dec. 2, 2016.

§ 61.63 Financial assurances for institutional controls. ( a ) Prior to the issuance of the license, the applicant shall provide for Commission review and approval a copy of a binding arrangement, such as a lease, between the applicant and the disposal site owner that ensures that sufficient funds will be available to cover the costs of monitoring and any required maintenance during the institutional control period. The binding arrangement will be reviewed periodically by the Commission to ensure that changes in inflation, technology and disposal facility operations are reflected in the arrangements.
( b ) Subsequent changes to the binding arrangement specified in paragraph (a) of this section relevant to institutional control shall be submitted to the Commission for approval.
EPA Form 5900-84

 OMB No. 2060-0336, Approval Expires 06/30/2015

Federal Operating Permit Program (40 CFR Part 71)

EMISSION CALCULATIONS (EMISS)

Calculate potential to emit (PTE) for applicability purposes and actual emissions for fee purposes for 

each emissions unit, control device, or alternative operating scenario identified in section I of form GIS. 

If form FEE does not need to be submitted with the application, do not calculate actual emissions.

A. Emissions Unit ID __EGEN 1_____

B. Identification and Quantification of Emissions

First, list each air pollutant that is either regulated at the unit or present in major amounts, then list any other 

regulated pollutant (for fee calculation) not already listed. HAP may be simply listed as "HAP." Next, 

calculate PTE for applicability purposes and actual emissions for fee purposes for each pollutant. Do not 

calculate PTE for air pollutants listed solely for fee purposes. Include all fugitives for fee purposes. You may 

round to the nearest tenth of a ton for yearly values or tenth of a pound for hourly values.

Air Pollutants

Emission Rates

CAS No.

Actual

Annual

Emissions

(tons/yr)

Potential to Emit

Hourly

(lb/hr)

Annual

(tons/yr)

CO 0.38 0.095

VOM 0.14 0.035

NOx 1.76 0.441

PM2.5 0.12 0.031

PM10 0.12 0.031

Part 0.12 0.031

SOx 0.116 0.029

HAP 0.0305 0.0071
#### In the Matter of Harry O’Donnell, Petitioner, v. John P. Lomenzo, as Secretary of State, Respondent.

Determination unanimously modified on the law and facts and in the exercise of discretion by reducing the punishment to suspension of license for three months, commencing from the date of the order to be entered hereon, and as modified confirmed, without costs. Memorandum: There was substantial evidence to support respondent’s determination of “ untrustworthiness ” on the part of petitioner under subdivision 1 of section 441-e of the Real Property Law and subdivisions 5 and 6 of section 296 of the Executive Law *(Matter of Diona*v. *Lomenzo,*26 A D 2d 473; cf. *Matter of Chiaino*v. *Lomenzo,*26 A D 2d 469; *Matter of Birch*v. *Lomenzo,*31 A D 2d 835). In the light of the petitioner’s hitherto unblemished record, however, and the evidence of his co-operative attitude with respect to complainant, we believe the punishment was excessive and that suspension for three months is more appropriate in this case (see *Matter of Kamper*v. *Department of State,*26 A D 2d 697, affd. 22 N Y 2d 690; *Matter of Black*v. *Lomenzo,*31 A D 2d 908; *Matter of Birch*v. *Lomenzo, supra).*(Review of determination revoking petitioner’s broker’s license, transferred by ordér of Erie Special Term.) Present — Del Vecehio, J. P., Witmer, Gabrielli, Bastow and Henry, JJ.
#### Birge *v.*The State.

*Indictment for Living in Adultery.*

1. *Husband and wife, as witnesses for or against each other.*— Under an indictment against two persons l'or living together in adultery (Code, § 4184), the husband of the woman is not a competent witness for the man, when both are on trial together under the plea of not guilty.

From the Circuit Court of Dale.

Tried before the Hon. H. D. Clayton.

STONE, C. J.

The defendant, a man, together with another, a female, were indicted under section 4184 of the Code of 1876, for living together in adultery. They were on trial together under the plea of not guilty. The h'usband of the female defendant was offered as a witness for the male defendant, and rejected by the court as incompetent to testify. This is the sole question this record presents.

“Husband and wife can not be witnesses for one another, nor regularly against one another; nor for or against any other person indicted and tried jointly with the husband or wife, for a joint offense. • • This inadmissibility is based on general *436questions of social policy, and is not abrogated by the statutes enabling a defendant to be examined in his own behalf.” Whar. Cr. Law, § 767 ; Whar. Cr. Ev. § 400, and *n.*3; *Wood v. The State,*76 Ala. 35.

The principle stated above is eminently applicable to the offense charged in this case. The offense can not be committed without the concurring, guilty participation of the two defendants. If one is guilty, the other must be, although one may be acquitted for defect of proof, while the other is convicted on testimony which tends to criminate only the one. A confession would be testimony of this class. Any testimony tending to exculpate one defendant, must necessarily tend to exculpate the other. Positive testimony in favor of the one must, in the nature of things, be testimony in favor of the other.

The judgment of the Circuit Court is affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                      25,225,743
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,076,572
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,240,640
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            33,125,097
<PP&E>                                     204,408,344
<DEPRECIATION>                              54,199,912
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             237,780,083
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       92,761,919
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                 21,227,621
<COMMON>                                        61,954
<OTHER-SE>                                (60,212,172)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               237,780,083
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            56,030,166
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               32,008,687
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            20,306,669
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          12,070,114
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (8,365,304)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (8,365,304)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (8,365,304)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
`[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 520 Reported in House (RH)]







                                                 House Calendar No. 106
109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 520

                          [Report No. 109-257]

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
     bill (H.R. 2744) making appropriations for Agriculture, Rural 
Development, Food and Drug Administration, and Related Agencies for the 
     fiscal year ending September 30, 2006, and for other purposes.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 27, 2005

    Mr. Putnam, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION


 
Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
     bill (H.R. 2744) making appropriations for Agriculture, Rural 
Development, Food and Drug Administration, and Related Agencies for the 
     fiscal year ending September 30, 2006, and for other purposes.

    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order to consider the conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 
2744) making appropriations for Agriculture, Rural Development, Food 
and Drug Administration, and Related Agencies for the fiscal year 
ending September 30, 2006, and for other purposes. All points of order 
against the conference report and against its consideration are waived. 
The conference report shall be considered as read.
                                                 House Calendar No. 106

109th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                              H. RES. 520

                          [Report No. 109-257]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
     bill (H.R. 2744) making appropriations for Agriculture, Rural 
Development, Food and Drug Administration, and Related Agencies for the 
     fiscal year ending September 30, 2006, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            October 27, 2005

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed`
H. Res. 572

In the House of Representatives, U.S., 

November 18, 2005.

Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall 

be in order without intervention of any point of order to consider in the House the resolution (H. Res. 571) expressing 

the sense of the House of Representatives that the deployment of United States forces in Iraq be terminated immediately. The resolution shall be considered as read. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the resolution to final adoption without intervening motion except: (1) 

one hour of debate equally divided and controlled by the 

chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on 

International Relations; and (2) one motion to recommit 

which may not contain instructions. 

SEC. 2. Upon adoption of this resolution, House Concurrent Resolution 308 is hereby adopted. 

Attest:

Clerk.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1997             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                    SEP-30-1997             DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                               622496                       0                             
<SECURITIES>                              0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                             0                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                              0                       0
<INVENTORY>                               0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          0                       0
<PP&E>                             13719039                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                      6725838                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                      7701778                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     0                       0
<BONDS>                                   0                       0
<COMMON>                                  0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0                       0
<PREFERRED>                               0                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                0                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>        7701778                       0
<SALES>                             1961832                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                    1971737                       0
<CGS>                                     0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             0                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                      641349                       0
<INCOME-TAX>                              0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                  641349                       0   
<DISCONTINUED>                            0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0                       0
<CHANGES>                                 0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                         641349                       0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                             0                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                             0                       0
        

</TABLE>
§ 5.230 Transition plans. ( a ) *Submission of plans.* An institution to which § 5.225 applies and that is composed of more than one administratively separate unit may submit either a single transition plan applicable to all such units, or a separate transition plan applicable to each such unit.
( b ) *Content of plans.* In order to be approved by the Secretary of Education, a transition plan shall: ( 1 ) State the name, address, and Federal Interagency Committee on Education Code of the educational institution submitting such plan, the administratively separate units to which the plan is applicable, and the name, address, and telephone number of the person to whom questions concerning the plan may be addressed. The person who submits the plan shall be the chief administrator or president of the institution, or another individual legally authorized to bind the institution to all actions set forth in the plan.
( 2 ) State whether the educational institution or administratively separate unit admits students of both sexes as regular students and, if so, when it began to do so.
( 3 ) Identify and describe with respect to the educational institution or administratively separate unit any obstacles to admitting students without discrimination on the basis of sex.
( 4 ) Describe in detail the steps necessary to eliminate as soon as practicable each obstacle so identified and indicate the schedule for taking these steps and the individual directly responsible for their implementation.
( 5 ) Include estimates of the number of students, by sex, expected to apply for, be admitted to, and enter each class during the period covered by the plan.
( c ) *Nondiscrimination.* No policy or practice of a recipient to which § 5.225 applies shall result in treatment of applicants to or students of such recipient in violation of §§ 5.300 through 5.310 unless such treatment is necessitated by an obstacle identified in paragraph (b)(3) of this section and a schedule for eliminating that obstacle has been provided as required by paragraph (b)(4) of this section.
( d ) *Effects of past exclusion.* To overcome the effects of past exclusion of students on the basis of sex, each educational institution to which § 5.225 applies shall include in its transition plan, and shall implement, specific steps designed to encourage individuals of the previously excluded sex to apply for admission to such institution. Such steps shall include instituting recruitment programs that emphasize the institution's commitment to enrolling students of the sex previously excluded.
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Christine A. Reuther and Ani Marie :

Diakatos, :

Appellants :

:

v. : No. 1365 C.D. 2017

:

Delaware County Bureau of Elections and :

Christine Rossi :

O R D E R

AND NOW, this 7th day of November, 2017, it is ordered that the 

Opinion filed on October 26, 2017, shall be designated OPINION rather than 

MEMORANDUM OPINION, and that it shall be reported. 

 

 P. KEVIN BROBSON, Judge
###### Editorial Note on Part 51

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 51 appear at 80 FR 74980, Dec. 1, 2015.

#### § 51.73 Request for comments on draft environmental impact statement.

Each draft environmental impact statement and each supplement to a draft environmental impact statement distributed in accordance with § 51.74, and each news release provided pursuant to § 51.74(d) will be accompanied by or include a request for comments on the proposed action and on the draft environmental impact statement or any supplement to the draft environmental impact statement and will state where comments should be submitted and the date on which the comment period closes. A minimum comment period of 45 days will be provided. The comment period will be calculated from the date on which the Environmental Protection Agency notice stating that the draft statement or the supplement to the draft statement has been filed with EPA is published in the Federal Register. If no comments are provided within the time specified, it will be presumed, unless the agency or person requests an extension of time, that the agency or person has no comment to make. To the extent practicable, NRC staff will grant reasonable requests for extensions of time of up to fifteen (15) days.
§ 39.75 Documents and records required at temporary jobsites. Each licensee conducting operations at a temporary jobsite shall maintain the following documents and records at the temporary jobsite until the well logging operation is completed: ( a ) Operating and emergency procedures required by § 39.63.
( b ) Evidence of latest calibration of the radiation survey instruments in use at the site required by § 39.33.
( c ) Latest survey records required by §§ 39.67 (b), (c), and (e).
( d ) The shipping papers for the transportation of radioactive materials required by § 71.5 of this chapter; and
( e ) When operating under reciprocity pursuant to § 150.20 of this chapter, a copy of the Agreement State license authorizing use of licensed materials.
Case 2:06-cr-00200-WHA-CSC Document 6 Filed 07/14/2006 Page 1 of 1
§ 602.9 Application evaluation and selection. ( a ) Applications shall be evaluated for funding generally within 6 months, but in any event no later than 12 months, from the date of receipt by DOE. After DOE has held an application for 6 months, the applicant may, in response to DOE's request, be required to revalidate the terms of the original application.
( b ) DOE shall perform an initial evaluation of all applications to ensure that the information required by this part is provided, that the proposed effort is technically sound and feasible, and that the effort is consistent with program funding priorities. For applications that pass the initial evaluation, DOE shall review and evaluate each application received based on the criteria set forth below and in accordance with the Office of Environment, Health, Safety, and Security Merit Review System developed, as required, under DOE Financial Assistance Regulations, 2 CFR 200 as amended by 2 CFR 910.
( c ) DOE shall select evaluators on the basis of their professional qualifications and expertise. To ensure credible and inclusive peer review of applications, every effort will be made to select evaluators apart from DOE employees and contractors. Evaluators shall be required to comply with all applicable DOE rules or directives concerning the use of outside evaluators.
( d ) DOE shall evaluate new and renewal applications based on the following criteria that are listed in descending order of importance: ( 1 ) The scientific and technical merit of the proposed research;
( 2 ) The appropriateness of the proposed method or approach;
( 3 ) Competency of research personnel and adequacy of proposed resources;
( 4 ) Reasonableness and appropriateness of the proposed budget; and
( 5 ) Other appropriate factors consistent with the purpose of this part established and set forth in a Notice of Availability or in a specific solicitation.
( e ) DOE shall also consider as part of the evaluation other available advice or information, as well as program policy factors, such as ensuring an appropriate balance among the program areas listed in § 602.5 of this part.
( f ) In addition to the evaluation criteria set forth in paragraphs (d) and (e) of this section, DOE shall consider the recipient's performance under the existing award during the evaluation of a renewal application.
( g ) Selection of applications for award will be based upon the findings of the technical evaluations (including peer reviews, as specified in the Office of Environment, Health, Safety and Security Merit Review System), the importance and relevance of the proposal to the Office of Environment, Health, Safety and Security's mission, and the availability of funds. Cost reasonableness and realism will also be considered.
( h ) After the selection of an application, DOE may, if necessary, enter into negotiations with an applicant. Such negotiations are not a commitment that DOE will make an award.
[60 FR 5841, Jan. 31, 1995, as amended at 71 FR 68729, Nov. 28, 2006; 79 FR 76046, Dec. 19, 2014; 80 FR 5007, Jan. 30, 2015]