alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 33.13 Requirements for the issuance of a Type A specific license of broad scope. An application for a Type A specific license of broad scope will be approved if: ( a ) The applicant satisfies the general requirements specified in § 30.33 of this chapter;
( b ) The applicant has engaged in a reasonable number of activities involving the use of byproduct material; and
( c ) The applicant has established administrative controls and provisions relating to organization and management, procedures, record keeping, material control, and accounting and management review that are necessary to assure safe operations, including: ( 1 ) The establishment of a radiation safety committee composed of such persons as a radiological safety officer, a representative of management, and persons trained and experienced in the safe use of radioactive materials;
( 2 ) The appointment of a radiological safety officer who is qualified by training and experience in radiation protection, and who is available for advice and assistance on radiological safety matters; and
( 3 ) The establishment of appropriate administrative procedures to assure: ( i ) Control of procurement and use of byproduct material;
( ii ) Completion of safety evaluations of proposed uses of byproduct material which take into consideration such matters as the adequacy of facilities and equipment, training and experience of the user, and the operating or handling procedures; and
( iii ) Review, approval, and recording by the radiation safety committee of safety evaluations of proposed uses prepared in accordance with paragraph (c)(3)(ii) of this section prior to use of the byproduct material.
**MEMORANDUM**

DATE: November 20, 2014 TO: Carbon Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket ID: OAR
- 2013 - 0602 FROM: Rob Lawrence

EPA/Region 6/PD SUBJECT: August 12 , 2014 Call with ODEQ r egarding the Proposed Carbon Power Plan for

Existing Power Plants
**SUMMARY** A conference call was made by EPA to the ODEQ and the a ttendee listed below on August 1 2 , 2014, to discuss the proposed Carbon Power Plan for Existing Power Plants, which was proposed on June 2, 2014.
**ATTENDEES** Participant : Eddie Terrill EPA Participant s: Terry Johnson, Clovis Steib, and Rob Lawrence (Region 6) and Kevin Callaghan (OAR)
Exhibit 31.1




Certification of Senior Officer in Charge of the Servicing Function


of the Servicer Pursuant to Rule 15d-14(d)









SERVICER CERTIFICATION






I, Mark Kaczynski, certify that:




1.           I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Nissan Auto Receivables 2013-A Trust (the “Exchange Act Periodic Reports”);




2.           Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act Periodic Reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;




3.           Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act Periodic Reports;




4.           I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act Periodic Reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and




5.           All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.




In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated party:  Citibank, N.A.




Date:                      June 27, 2013




By:/s/ Mark Kaczynski


Mark Kaczynski


President and Chief Executive Officer of


Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation


(senior officer in charge of the


servicing function)
Exhibit 12.3

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO EXCHANGE ACT RULE 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a)

I, Joseph E. Payne, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the annual report on Form 20-F of Arcturus Therapeutics Ltd.; and

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

Date: July 10, 2018

|                                                                      |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------|
| /s/ Joseph E. Payne                                                  |
| Joseph E. Payne                                                      |
| President and Chief Executive Officer

(principal executive officer) |
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, Brian E. Schaaf, certify that:

 

1.                                    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Ford Credit Auto Owner Trust 2012-D (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

 

2.                                    Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.                                    Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4.                                    I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and

 

5.                                    All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: The Bank of New York Mellon, as indenture trustee of the issuing entity, and U.S. Bank Trust National Association, as owner trustee of the issuing entity.

 
| Dated   March 18, 2015 |                                               |
|-----------------------------|----------------------------------------------------|
|                        |                                               |
|                        |                                               |
|                        | /s/   Brian E. Schaaf                              |
|                        | Brian   E. Schaaf                                  |
|                        | Vice   President and Assistant Treasurer           |
|                        | Ford   Motor Credit Company LLC, as Servicer       |
|                        | (senior   officer in charge of servicing function) |

 

----
Second Amendment to the Third Amended and Restated Services Agreement



 Exhibit 10.40B 
 SECOND AMENDMENT 
 TO THE 
 THIRD AMENDED AND RESTATED SERVICES AGREEMENT 
 This Second Amendment (the “Second Amendment”) to the Third Amended and Restated Services Agreement and
entered into this 21st day of February, 2010
(“Effective Date”), by and between First Data Technologies, Inc. (“FDT”) and CSG Systems, Inc. (“CSG”). 
 W I T N E S S E T H: 
 WHEREAS, CSG and FDT entered into a Third Amended and Restated Services Agreement
dated as of August 2003, as previously amended (the “Service Agreement”); and 
 WHEREAS, CSG and FDT desire to
hereby amend the Service Agreement as hereinafter more particularly set forth. 
 NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the
foregoing mutual promises contained herein, CSG and FDT hereby agree, as of the Effective Date, as follows: 
 1. Section 1.38 of the
Service Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following: 
 “‘Original Term’ means the
period of time commencing on the Effective Date and ending June 30, 2010. The Original Term shall automatically extend for up to six successive one (1) month extension periods expiring no later than December 31, 2010, unless CSG
provides FDT written notice at least forty-five (45) days prior to the expiration date of the Original Term or the then-current extension period that the Original Term will not be further extended. All references to June 30, 2010 shall be
interpreted to mean through the end of the Original Term.” 
 2. As hereby amended and supplemented, the Third Amended and Restated
Services Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the Parties hereto has caused
this Amendment to the Third Amended and Restated Services Agreement to be executed as of the date first written above. 
  

			
	CSG SYSTEMS, INC.
		
	Signed By:	 	/s/ Bret C. Griess


			
		
	Print Name:	 	Bret C. Griess
		 	


			
		
	Title:	 	EVP

  
  
  

			
	FIRST DATA TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
		
	Signed By:	 	/s/ Randall Roumillat


			
		
	Print Name:	 	Randall Roumillat


			
		
	Title:	 	SVP-GIO
###### Editorial Note on Part 51

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 51 appear at 80 FR 74980, Dec. 1, 2015.

#### § 51.124 Commission duty to comment.

It is the policy of the Commission to comment on draft environmental impact statements prepared by other Federal agencies, consistent with the provisions of 40 CFR 1503.2 and 1503.3.
2007-2344.

#### State v. Williams.

Hamilton App. Nos. C-060631 and C-060668, 2007-Ohio~5577. On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion granted.

O’Connor, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., dissent.
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Sharon J. Wells, Appellant. Commissioner of Labor, Respondent.

[815 NYS2d 347]

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed April 29, 2005, which, upon reconsideration, adhered to its prior decision ruling that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she lost her employment due to misconduct.

Substantial evidence supports the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board ruling that claimant lost her employment as a family monitor for a shelter due to disqualifying misconduct. The record establishes that claimant became involved in a heated argument with a client at the shelter. Despite a supervisor twice calling claimant into a small nearby office and advising her that her confrontation with the client was inappropriate and could lead to her termination, claimant continued to engage in the confrontation with the client by using profane language and challenging the client to carry out the verbal threats she was making against claimant. Inasmuch as the record establishes that claimant was aware of the employer’s policy prohibiting discourteous behavior, and had received a prior written warning regarding inappropriate conduct, we find no reason to disturb the Board’s decision *(see Matter of Obafemi [Commissioner of Labor],*250 AD2d 905, 906 [1998]; *Matter of Martin [Sweeney],*226 AD2d 800 [1996]). To the extent that *1258claimant contends that she acted appropriately under the circumstances and denies that she continued to engage in the confrontation with the client, this created a credibility issue for the Board to resolve *(see Matter of Mack [Commissioner of Labor],*286 AD2d 795, 796 [2001]).

Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Carpinello, Lahtinen and Kane, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 469 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 469

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                    September 29, 2005.
    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in order 
without intervention of any point of order to consider in the House the joint 
resolution (H.J. Res. 68) making continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 
2006, and for other purposes. The joint resolution shall be considered as read. 
The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the joint resolution to 
final passage without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate equally 
divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the 
Committee on Appropriations; and (2) one motion to recommit.
    Sec. 2. It shall be in order at any time on the legislative day of Thursday, 
October 6, 2005, for the Speaker to entertain motions that the House suspend the 
rules. The Speaker or his designee shall consult with the Minority Leader or her 
designee on the designation of any matter for consideration pursuant to this 
resolution.
    Sec. 3. A motion to proceed pursuant to section 2908 of the Defense Base 
Closure and Realignment Act of 1990 shall be in order only if offered by the 
Majority Leader or his designee.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
PGI 209.571-7 Systems engineering and

technical assistance contracts.

Because of the special organizational conflict of interest restrictions that relate to systems

engineering and technical assistance contracts, it is more practical to separate systems engineering

and technical assistance-type work from design- and development-type work, and not include both

types of work in the same task order or other contract vehicle.

Parent topic: PGI 209.571 Organizational conflicts of interest in major defense acquisition

programs.
_L_____oo c_____o_^C_cIv.v__, Af_^__a_\3 C- \e__k. - kksJuAr7_._30J.5_

__J C_0__^Co^:_--M.o_a_^ ftECFlVPp/M - ' -• C0OT^0FCRIMINAL APPEALS Tr .__Ci„.__^__\_V7,feH-

^v P.P. R. A?^n\. W 23 2015

<3^__ 2-_-£_-_sd___^

___<_>—r\(_>X-__S^e^>X-7-^J^qV^\^-_cxjoA vf____^oA___^__(_^___^^

______—:oooj_<_ JQ<xA S____/_e>»^ \^^^^J^5>—-^s^^j^<^^^^ w^—- \v^v

_c__> ^Gooo_>€ (Xv_\_V >r\__\rv_ oV ^M£^rn__V^\o^<^^^

t V__\v cAc-Jv>nr\ 0V vy^v^0_jlj^_/_g...?_.,

/V_VxC.-ANW.v_n_JSo3J_> \_b v__\y___o^p^\xxrfc«s-—_C^_u_o5___A___c______<k.

_V__b txV^«k___5_yl_„aj_> €____Aj_j^V^Va o? •4r\yno_ ^^i AW,

-A-_o„o_cli \_\_vib QOxnVA c^Lv_v____e_>c_Wj_^?bu>^t .__^nrx\ D<_c-e^v\V>eX OU

J^_V5_.____-__—uoo-S—^5o_o^sreA__!fe__ao—^ou_X___to rj»>rV vVn Auql^^t

3____l__r^_l^__„GL_^

____b—Sej^_t-ic^^-'-^r"_U3A5__c-^A~:—cu^_iA^C£a___j_l\_J_^ c^

______—ujojoAA—Yijfce-—335 Kwoj-o \\jWu "~^- N^ou^^..___ji_vo_jr__Ae>'»

€><y\-V Wcx-eJ/C T5 <_ Q_P_*_ZS__a "___

>-__<-V_\_

—£^—u_ao__A__<xJLfi>^—kke.___tc t^ao_vjO____H^-e__-^Arxclau-<b o-5_

—5^y—\-_-Q<-S-«--a--.^T". Wx_u_ £xj^^Ay_____c_o^A__^^

rr_ac^____rs.-eie_<_^—yyr\^e-~i~OLMy^\ ^iv_\w_\o_e__2_v_\__T n5>___ A-^e_^> *»

_Cj_>_*jCGye-%—eu^_c_^ l*_^c_J_ 0e_\.<__c^_^_J^v___. poj_a-.ae-.__t.v-N.

____LV__!_>__.j _\ruo_c> ___>^__v__r__v_% \oe_Vkf_- -V^.^ C_V\m_Q-^hg- _________

_<__^_____C_: V-&-*

=^'-—C^rs\__V^^j^__o0^^ C^^s3__aJ________>o^^

C^^\^<y^\--U^<y^^Q^^> W__-__0__^_____V_\^^

-^©cx^v^Vn-.^^ <uu_c____\V___Yo:o rto___c____c_ep__V-_^
___A?»C_>. \vr____Q^^_vl,'gj^J^Q>^^ L___ :_______ i-2___e>__.__r___A_^

_^0-_xt>_ArxX—S=> C3-»_\ V-VN-VlwX^Vy 9'^-^^ OP —CrV.'T ____JQ_Ou_n.7t..

^tc_ W*_ Vvv^e^ \__»our\r_-^- V?^C<_X-U9._--. <_yjr <y Vrv_*J--VJ-ejr.._,^^

do^.^v\T Vx^Vo {^v^v-C___ '__i

_ __\<__3_S_^___av^^^ M__V__y__J_V_______4 _

-Pa.a ^xY p^'^'

_______c_j____i_J^^ __A \vr_-N -e. _.

9,__^_\ VAWac___ ;

t\)_-& \q_>\:M»l ^M^^^^^^-^^

McA_o_v/ve-\\ Dwc"\7 __JoV_e>___©.e_^^^

7f_o\ S^w^y^

^__vAV^7^ ^vgflQ- _____ ___„_
ROY BLUNT MISSOURI VICE CHAIR, SENATE REPURLICAN CONFERENCE 260 RUSSELL SENATE [ I FFICE BUILDING WASHINGTON, DC 20510-2508

202-224-5721 . 

# `United ^5tates ^6enate
WASHINGTON, DC 20510 COMMITTEES: APPROPRIATIONS ARMED SERVICES COMMERCE, SCIENCE AND TRANSPORTATION RULES AND ADMINISTRATION March 1 i; `h , 2014 The Honorable Gina McCarthy Administrator U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Ariel Rios Building, Mail Code: 1001 A 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20460
Dear Administrator McCarthy, I am writing in regard to the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA.) recently proposed New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) for residential wood stoves, announced on January 3`a, 2014. 1 have serious concerns this rule will hurt small wood stove manufacturers and could make the burning of wood in households prohibitively expensive. "fhis rule will primarily fall on the backs of small businesses. Of the wood stove rnanufacturers, only a minority in the industry currently produce wood stoves which meet the proposed standard. Your agency's own estimates have found the rule will result in an annual inerease ot $127,000 in new costs for these businesses. It would also affect the many others that participate in the industry such as building supply stores, hardware stores, fire wood suppliers, electric cooperatives and insurance companies. Most importantly, this rule will directly affect the nearly 12 million U.S. households that use wood heaters as a way to keep their homes warm. Many homeowners find the burning of wood to heat homes to be a reliable and atfordable source of fuel. This Administration has spent considerable effort to promoting renewable sources of energy. Because of this I am surprised the EPA appears to be hampering the wood stove industry, which provides access to an abundant renewable fuel. As the EPA continues to evaluate and receive feedback for its proposed NSPS for residential wood stoves, I hope you will keep these concerns in mind and listen to those most directly impacted by these regulations. Thank you for your attention to this important issue. Sincere ret;ards,

..., .^

.. . Senato Rey Blunt

www.facebook.com/senatorblunt www.blunt.senate.gov www.twitter.com/royblunt
### C OURT OF 

### A PPEALS FOR THE



### F IRST 

### D ISTRICT OF 

### T EXAS AT 

### H OUSTON



### O RDER ON 

### M OTION

Cause Number: 01

- 12

- 00708

- CV

Style: William Bush and Mari Marc S.A. de C.V

v Cardtronics, Inc. and Cardtronics S.A. de C.V.

Date motion filed * : January 13, 2013

Type of motion: Exten sion of time to notify C ourt of counsel h ired

Party filing motion: Appellant

Document to be filed:

Is appeal accelerated? Yes No

If motion to extend time:

Original due date: January 4, 2013

Number of previous extensions granted: 0

Date Requested:

O rdered that motion is:

Granted

If document is to be filed, document due: February 18, 2013

Absent extraordinary circumstances, the Court will not grant additional motions to extend time

Denied

Dismissed ( e.g. , want of jurisdiction, moot)

Other:

Judge's signature: /s/ Laura C. Higley

Acting individually Acting for the Court

Panel consists of

Date: January 22, 2013
#### § 431.81 Purpose and scope.

This subpart contains energy conservation requirements for certain commercial packaged boilers, pursuant to Part C of Title III of the Energy Policy and Conservation Act. (42 U.S.C. 6311-6317)

[69 FR 61960, Oct. 21, 2004, as amended at 70 FR 60415, Oct. 18, 2005]
#### PEOPLE, Respondent, v. ANZELLOTTI, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

December 24, 1914.)

Proceeding by the People of the State of New York against Joseph Anzellotti.

No opinion. Motion granted.
§ 436.105 Emergency conservation plan. ( a ) Each agency shall establish an emergency conservation plan, a summary of which shall be included in the general operations plan, for assuaging the impact of a sudden disruption in the supply of oil-based fuels, natural gas or electricity. Priorities for temporarily reducing missions, production, services, and other programmatic or functional activities shall be developed in accordance with paragraph (b) of this section. Planning for emergencies is to address both buildings and general operations. Provisions shall be made for testing emergency actions to ascertain that they are effective.
( b ) Federal agencies shall prepare emergency conservation plans for 10 percent, fifteen percent, and 20 percent reduction compared to the previous fiscal year in gasoline, other oil-based fuels, natural gas, or electricity for periods of up to 12 months. In developing these plans, agencies shall consider the potential for emergency reductions in energy use in buildings and facilities which the agency owns, leases, or has under contract and by employees through increased use of car and van pooling, preferential parking for multipassenger vehicles, and greater use of mass transit. Agencies may formulate whatever additional scenarios they consider necessary to plan for various energy emergencies.
( c ) In general, Federal agencies' priorities shall go to those activities which directly support the agencies' primary missions. Secondary mission activities which must be curtailed or deferred will be reported to DOE as mission impacts. The description of mission impacts shall include estimates of the associated resources and time required to mitigate the effects of the reduction in energy. Other factors or assumptions to be used in energy conservation emergency planning are as follows: ( 1 ) Agencies will be given 15-30 days notice to implement any given plan.
( 2 ) Substitution of fuels in plentiful supply for fuels in short supply is authorized, if the substitution can be completed within a 3-month period and the cost is within the approval authority of the executive branch.
( 3 ) All costs and increases in manpower or other resources associated with activities or projects to assuage mission impacts will be clearly defined in respective agency plans. One-time costs will be identified separately.
( 4 ) Confronting the emergency situation will be considered a priority effort and all projects and increases in operating budgets within the approval authority of the executive branch will be expeditiously considered and approved if justified.
( d ) Summary plans for agency-wide emergency conservation management shall be provided to DOE pursuant to § 436.102(b)(2)(vi). Such summaries shall include: ( 1 ) Agency-wide impacts of energy reductions as determined in accordance with paragraph (b) of this section.
( 2 ) Actions to be taken agency-wide to alleviate the energy shortfalls as they occur.
( 3 ) An assessment of agency services or production that may need to be curtailed or limited after corrective actions have been taken.
( 4 ) A summation of control and feedback mechanisms for managing an energy emergency situation.