alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 431.405 Exported electric motors. Under Sections 330 and 345 of the Act, this part does not apply to any electric motor if: ( a ) Such electric motor is manufactured, sold, or held for sale for export from the United States (or such electric motor was imported for export), unless such electric motor is, in fact, distributed in commerce for use in the United States; and,
( b ) Such electric motor, when distributed in commerce, or any container in which it is enclosed when so distributed, bears a stamp or label stating that such electric motor is intended for export.
[76 FR 12505, Mar. 7, 2011]
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 (AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sionix Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James R. Currier, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify to my knowledge and in my capacity as an officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and,

2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.

Date: January 13, 2010

| |                                                                             
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |                                                                             
| |                                                                             
| | /s/ James R. Currier                                                        
| | James R. Currier                                                            
| | Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, Secretary and Principal Executive Officer



A certification furnished pursuant to this Item will not be deemed filed for purposes of section 18 of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78r), or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the registrant specifically incorporates it by reference.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                       3,256,957
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,871,700<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  3,753,068<F2>
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            11,449,001
<PP&E>                                       5,487,574
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,916,728
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              14,275,745
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,985,630
<BONDS>                                      1,457,143
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        43,351
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,806,290
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                14,275,745
<SALES>                                     12,984,487
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            13,061,111
<CGS>                                       11,006,499
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               11,006,499
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,356,302
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             142,255
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                556,055
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (49,029)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            605,084
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   605,084
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .11
<FN>
<F1>ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE ARE NET OF ALLOWANCE OF $75,000 AT JUNE 30, 1997.
<F2>INVENTORIES ARE NET OF RESERVE OF $152,000 AT JUNE 30, 1997.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-15-00342-CV

VILLA DIJON CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC.

and Implicity Management Company,

Appellants

v.

Mary WINTERS and Mila Cheatom,

Appellees

From the 166th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015-CI-03926

Honorable John D. Gabriel, Jr., Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Jason Pulliam, Justice

Delivered and Filed: October 5, 2016

DISMISSED

In an appeal from a default judgment, appellants Villa Dijon Condominium Association, 

Inc., and Implicity Management Company asserted the trial court erred in concluding it did not 

have plenary jurisdiction to grant their motion for new trial. On September 7, 2016, this court held 

the trial court had plenary jurisdiction to rule on the motion for new trial and the trial court’s refusal 

to act was remedial. Accordingly, this court abated this appeal and remanded the cause to the trial 

court with instructions to enter an order ruling on the motion for new trial.
04-15-00342-CV

- 2 -

This court has received a supplemental record showing the trial court granted the motion

for new trial. Therefore, the memorandum opinion and judgment issued in this case on September 

7, 2016 are withdrawn, and this appeal is reinstated on the docket of the court.

This appeal is dismissed.

PER CURIAM
PGI 226.1 -INDIAN INCENTIVE PROGRAM    **Parent topic:** PGI Part 226 - OTHER SOCIOECONOMIC PROGRAMSPGI 226.103 Procedures.       (1) Submit a request for funding of the Indian incentive to—          Director, the Office of Small Business Programs          201 12th Street South, Suite 406          Arlington, VA 22202-5411.          (2) Upon receipt of funding from the Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense (Industrial Policy), Office of Small Business Programs, issue a contract modification to add the Indian incentive funding for payment of the contractor’s request for adjustment as described in the clause at DFARS 252.226-7001, Utilization of Indian Organizations, Indian-Owned Economic Enterprises, and Native Hawaiian Small Business Concerns.
§ 60.140 General requirements. ( a ) The performance confirmation program shall provide data which indicates, where practicable, whether: ( 1 ) Actual subsurface conditions encountered and changes in those conditions during construction and waste emplacement operations are within the limits assumed in the licensing review; and
( 2 ) Natural and engineered systems and components required for repository operation, or which are designed or assumed to operate as barriers after permanent closure, are functioning as intended and anticipated.
( b ) The program shall have been started during site characterization and it will continue until permanent closure.
( c ) The program shall include in situ monitoring, laboratory and field testing, and in situ experiments, as may be appropriate to accomplish the objective as stated above.
( d ) The program shall be implemented so that: ( 1 ) It does not adversely affect the ability of the natural and engineered elements of the geologic repository to meet the performance objectives.
( 2 ) It provides baseline information and analysis of that information on those parameters and natural processes pertaining to the geologic setting that may be changed by site characterization, construction, and operational activities.
( 3 ) It monitors and analyzes changes from the baseline condition of parameters that could affect the performance of a geologic repository.
( 4 ) It provides an established plan for feedback and analysis of data, and implementation of appropriate action.
§ 490.702 Definitions. In addition to the definitions found in § 490.2, the following definitions apply to this subpart— *Biodiesel* means a diesel fuel substitute produced from nonpetroleum renewable resources that meets the registration requirements for fuels and fuel additives established by the Environmental Protection Agency under section 211 of the Clean Air Act; and
*Qualifying volume* means— ( 1 ) 450 gallons; or
( 2 ) If DOE determines by rule that the average annual alternative fuel use in light duty vehicles by fleets and covered persons exceeds 450 gallons or gallon equivalents, the amount of such average annual alternative fuel use.
# L_2023164EN.01011001.xml

| 29.6.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 164/110 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.6.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 164/110

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE No 355/2022

of 9 December 2022

amending Annex XXII (Company law) to the EEA Agreement [2023/1297]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (“the EEA Agreement”), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2020/589 of 23 April 2020 on the adequacy of the competent authority of the Republic of South Africa pursuant to Directive 2006/43/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2020/589 of 23 April 2020 on the adequacy of the competent authority of the Republic of South Africa pursuant to Directive 2006/43/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex XXII to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex XXII to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following point is inserted after point 10fh (Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/1010) of Annex XXII to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘10fi. | 32020 D 0589: Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2020/589 of 23 April 2020 on the adequacy of the competent authority of the Republic of South Africa pursuant to Directive 2006/43/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 138, 30.4.2020, p. 15).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘10fi.

32020 D 0589: Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2020/589 of 23 April 2020 on the adequacy of the competent authority of the Republic of South Africa pursuant to Directive 2006/43/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 138, 30.4.2020, p. 15).’

Article 2

The text of Implementing Decision (EU) 2020/589 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 10 December 2022, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 9 December 2022.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Kristján Andri STEFÁNSSON

---

(1)  
  OJ L 138, 30.4.2020, p. 15.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
1202.7000 General.       The following abbreviations or acronyms may be used throughout the TAR and the agency's associated internal policies and procedures in the TAM—          Table 1 to 1202.7000—Abbreviations and AcronymsCFO                                           Chief Financial Officer.CIO                                           Chief Information Officer.COCO                                           Chief of the Contracting Office.COR                                           Contracting Officer's Representative.D&F                                           Determination and Findings.FOIA                                           Freedom of Information Act.HCA                                           Head of the Contracting Activity.HOA                                           Head of the Operating Administration.J&A                                           Justification and Approval.OA                                           Operating Administration.OIG                                           Office of the Inspector General.OSDBU                                           Office of Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization.PCR                                           Procurement Center Representative.RFP                                           Request for Proposal.SBA                                           Small Business Administration.SBS                                           Small Business Specialist.SPE                                           Senior Procurement Executive.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 1202.70—Abbreviations
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          48,263
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   69,519
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               117,782
<PP&E>                                       5,486,730
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,470,519
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,291,741
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          365,757
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,291,741
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               404,230
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               375,734
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             266,323
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (237,827)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

PANAMERICAN OPERATING, INC.,

Appellant,

v.

MAUD SMITH ESTATE, A TEXAS

GENERAL PARTNERSHIP,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 12

- 00036

- CV

Appeal from the

97th Judicial District Court

of Archer County, Texas

(TC#2009

- 0000028A

- CV)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. We further order that Appellee

recover from Appellant and its sureties, see T EX .R.A PP .P. 43.5, on the judgment and all costs

both in this Court and the court below, for which let execution issue. This decision shall be

certif ied below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 24TH DAY OF JULY, 2013.

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice

Before Rivera, J., Rodriguez, J., and Larsen, J.( Senior Judge )

Larsen, J. ( Senior Judge ) (Sitting by As signment)
§ 52.45 Filing of applications. ( a ) An application for design certification may be filed notwithstanding the fact that an application for a construction permit, combined license, or manufacturing license for such a facility has not been filed.
( b ) The application must comply with the applicable filing requirements of §§ 52.3 and §§ 2.811 through 2.819 of this chapter.
( c ) The fees associated with the review of an application for the initial issuance or renewal of a standard design certification are set forth in 10 CFR part 170.
#### In re McCORMICK.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

July 1, 1914.)

In the matter of John J. McCormick.

No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.
APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW

2007-1529.

#### Fletcher v. Univ. Hosps. of Cleveland.

Cuyahoga App. No. 88573, 172 Ohio App.3d 153, 2007-Ohio-2778.

Pfeifer, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., dissent.
IV 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 279 

Condemning the recent vote by the British Association of University Teachers 

to boycott Bar-Ilan University and Haifa University. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 16, 2005 

Mr. HIGGINS (for himself, Mr. PENCE, Mr. CROWLEY, Ms. ROS-LEHTINEN, 

Mr. WEINER, Ms. BERKLEY, Mr. NADLER, Mr. LANTOS, Mr. ISRAEL, 

Ms. WASSERMAN SCHULTZ, Mr. FRANK of Massachusetts, Mrs. 

TAUSCHER, Mr. SOUDER, Mr. AKIN, Mr. ACKERMAN, Mr. ENGEL, Mr. 

ROTHMAN, Mr. ANDREWS, Mr. BURTON of Indiana, Mr. SESSIONS, and 

Mr. GARRETT of New Jersey) submitted the following resolution; which 

was referred to the Committee on International Relations 

RESOLUTION 

Condemning the recent vote by the British Association of 

University Teachers to boycott Bar-Ilan University and 

Haifa University. 

Whereas on April 22, 2005, the British Association of University Teachers voted to boycott two Israeli universities, 

Bar-Ilan University and Haifa University, and is currently considering taking action against a third Israeli 

university; 

Whereas institutions of higher education should be places of 

boundless thought and expression, bridging religious, ethnic, and language divides and bringing disparate groups 

together, not pushing them apart; 
2 

•HRES 279 IH 

Whereas the British Association of University Teachers has 

stated it will allow exceptions for professors from these 

universities only if they publicly take loyalty oaths disavowing the Israeli Government; 

Whereas Israel is the strongest ally of the United States and 

a true democratic partner in the Middle East; 

Whereas the action taken by the British Association of University Teachers threatens both British and Israeli students and violates the ideals that the classroom and the 

campus should be places of open dialogue; 

Whereas the British Association of University Teachers, by 

holding Israel to exceptional standards, questioning the 

legitimacy of the State of Israel, and singling out Israeli 

academic institutions for boycott, nourishes an environment of anti-Zionism and encourages the spread of antiSemitism; and 

Whereas only through the unfettered flow of information and 

knowledge can true democracy thrive and ideas and beliefs be freely exchanged: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) condemns the vote by the British Associa3 tion of University Teachers on April 22, 2005, to 

4 boycott Bar-Ilan University and Haifa University; 

5 (2) calls on the British Association of Univer6 sity Teachers to overturn this vote at its hearing on 

7 May 26, 2005; 

8 (3) denounces the call by the British Associa9 tion of University Teachers for professors from these 
3 

•HRES 279 IH 

1 universities to take loyalty oaths disavowing the 

2 Israeli Government; and 

3 (4) urges governments and educators through4 out the world to generate dialogue regarding their 

5 differences and not bar students and professors from 

6 engaging with and learning from each other. 

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 527 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 527

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                      November 3, 2005.
    Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker 
may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XVIII, declare the House resolved into the 
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of the 
bill (H.R. 4128) to protect private property rights. The first reading of the 
bill shall be dispensed with. All points of order against consideration of the 
bill are waived. General debate shall be confined to the bill and shall not 
exceed 90 minutes, with 60 minutes equally divided and controlled by the 
chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on the Judiciary and 30 
minutes equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority 
member of the Committee on Agriculture. After general debate the bill shall be 
considered for amendment under the five-minute rule. It shall be in order to 
consider as an original bill for the purpose of amendment under the five-minute 
rule the amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on 
the Judiciary now printed in the bill. The committee amendment in the nature of 
a substitute shall be considered as read. Notwithstanding clause 11 of rule 
XVIII, no amendment to the committee amendment in the nature of a substitute 
shall be in order except those printed in the report of the Committee on Rules 
accompanying this resolution. Each such amendment may be offered only in the 
order printed in the report, may be offered only by a Member designated in the 
report, shall be considered as read, shall be debatable for the time specified 
in the report equally divided and controlled by the proponent and an opponent, 
shall not be subject to amendment, and shall not be subject to a demand for 
division of the question in the House or in the Committee of the Whole. All 
points of order against such amendments are waived. At the conclusion of 
consideration of the bill for amendment the Committee shall rise and report the 
bill to the House with such amendments as may have been adopted. Any Member may 
demand a separate vote in the House on any amendment adopted in the Committee of 
the Whole to the bill or to the committee amendment in the nature of a 
substitute. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and 
amendments thereto to final passage without intervening motion except one motion 
to recommit with or without instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```