alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Clean Systems Technology Group, Ltd.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Jacob Lustgarten Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.


June 2, 2003
                                              By: /s/ Jacob Lustgarten
                                              ------------------------
                                              Name: Jacob Lustgarten
                                              Title: Chief Executive Officer



<PAGE>
#### Emil H. Doyon et al. *v.*Town of South Windsor

*Robert W. Gordon,*in support of the petition.

*Richard M. Rittenband,*in opposition.

Decided April 25, 1984

The petition of the plaintiffs Wayne M. and Pamela F. Stone for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 1 Conn. App. 417, is denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                         372,556
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               372,556
<PP&E>                                         213,245
<DEPRECIATION>                                  86,676
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 626,850
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          283,361
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        31,757
<OTHER-SE>                                    (18,119)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   626,850
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               150,556
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (150,556)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (150,556)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (150,556)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.00)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>  This schedule contains summary financial
information extracted from Balance Sheets and Statement of
Operations for the second quarter ended June 30, 1997 Form
10Q of Delphi Film Associates IV and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
       
<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                          6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                           JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                 280,000
<SECURITIES>                           1,250,000
<RECEIVABLES>                          1,425,000
<ALLOWANCES>                              0
<INVENTORY>                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          0
<PP&E>                                    0
<DEPRECIATION>                            0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         2,966,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       0
<BONDS>                                   0
<COMMON>                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0
<PREFERRED>                               0
<OTHER-SE>                             2,916,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           2,966,000
<SALES>                                   0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            28,000
<CGS>                                     0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 149,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           307,000
<INCOME-TAX>                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<CHANGES>                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                    307,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                38.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                             0
        

</TABLE>
§ 15.31 Disputed debts. ( a ) *Submitting a dispute of debt.* For any type of charges assessed by the NRC, a debtor may submit a dispute of debt within 45 days from the date of the initial demand letter. The debtor shall explain why the debt is incorrect in fact or in law and may support the explanation by affidavit, cancelled checks, or other relevant evidence. The dispute must be submitted to the Office of the Chief Financial Officer via the eBilling system, by email to *FeeBillingInquiries.Resource@nrc.gov ,* or by mail to the Office of the Chief Financial Officer at: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001, Attn: Chief Financial Officer. For debt disputes related to charges for 10 CFR part 170 fees, the debtor must complete and submit an NRC Form 529 with the required information.
( b ) *Notification of receipt.* Following receipt of the dispute, the NRC will acknowledge receipt to the contact person identified by the debtor.
( c ) *Dispute review.* The NRC will consider the facts involved in the dispute and, if it considers it necessary, arrange for a conference during which the debtor may present evidence and any arguments in support of the debtor's position. If the debtor's dispute potentially raises an error, the NRC may extend the interest waiver period as described in § 15.37(j) pending a final determination of the existence or amount of the debt.
( d ) *Dispute resolution.* If the NRC finds that the dispute has not identified an error, the NRC will notify the dispute contact. If the NRC finds that the dispute has identified an error, the NRC will: ( 1 ) Notify the dispute contact;
( 2 ) Make corrections to the charges or information on the demand letter; and
( 3 ) Issue a revised demand letter.
[86 FR 32169, June 16, 2021]
#### State of Kansas, *Appellant,*v. Michael R. Warren, *Appellee.*

No. 47,809

Opinion filed December 13, 1975.

*William*P. *Coates, Jr.,*assistant district attorney, argued the cause, and *Curt T. Schneider,*attorney general, and *Margaret W. Jordan,*district attorney, were with him on the brief for the appellant.

*Bruce F. Landeck,*of Lowe, Terry & Roberts, of Olathe, argued the cause, and was on the brief for the appellee.

Per *Curiam:*

Reversed with directions.
H. Res. 379

In the House of Representatives, U.S., 

July 26, 2005.

Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it 

shall be in order without intervention of any point of order 

to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 525) to amend title 

I of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 

to improve access and choice for entrepreneurs with small 

businesses with respect to medical care for their employees. 

The bill shall be considered as read. The previous question 

shall be considered as ordered on the bill and on any amendment thereto to final passage without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate on the bill equally divided and 

controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of 

the Committee on Education and the Workforce; (2) the 

amendment in the nature of a substitute printed in the report 

of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution, if 

offered by Representative Kind of Wisconsin or his designee, 

which shall be in order without intervention of any point of 

order, shall be considered as read, and shall be separately debatable for one hour equally divided and controlled by the 
2

•HRES 379 EH 

proponent and an opponent; and (3) one motion to recommit 

with or without instructions. 

Attest:

Clerk.
#### HERTZ, Respondent, v. GOODMAN, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

June 26, 1914.)

Action by Ida Herz against Aaron Goodman.

W. T. Kohn, of New York City, for appellant.

M. Stein, of New York City, for respondent.

No opinion. Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Order filed.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 429 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 429

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                    September 21, 2005.
Whereas on Sunday, August 28, 2005, the West Oahu Little League baseball team of 
        Ewa Beach, Hawaii, defeated the Curacao Little League team by a score of 
        7-6 to win the 2005 Little League World Series Championship at South 
        Williamsport, Pennsylvania;
Whereas the Championship game was one of the most exciting in Little League 
        history, with West Oahu overcoming a 3-run deficit and winning the game 
        in the seventh inning;
Whereas the 2005 West Oahu Little League World Championship team consists of 
        players Layson ``Kaeo'' Aliviado, Harrison Kam, Ty Tirpak, Zachary 
        Ranit, Ethan Javier, Vonn Fe'ao, Quentin Guevara, Sheyne Baniaga, 
        Michael Memea, Zachary Rosete, Myron ``Kini'' Enos, Jr., Alaka'i 
        Aglipay, Manager Layton Aliviado, Dugout Coach Tyron Kitashima, and 
        First Base Coach Clint Tirpak;
Whereas the championship victory of the West Oahu Little League Baseball Team 
        testifies to the sportsmanship, hard work, and dedication of its 
        members; and
Whereas the achievement of the West Oahu Little League Baseball Team is the 
        cause of enormous pride for the Nation, the State of Hawaii and the 
        community of Ewa Beach: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives congratulates the West Oahu 
Little League Baseball Team on its victory in the 2005 Little League World 
Series Championship games.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Editorial Note on Part 420
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 420 appear at 64 FR 46114, Aug. 24, 1999.

§ 420.35 Application evaluation. ( a ) DOE staff at the cognizant Regional Office shall perform an initial review of all applications to ensure that the State has provided the information required by this subpart, 10 CFR part 600, and the program guidance/solicitation.
( b ) DOE shall group, and technically evaluate according to program activity, all applications determined to be complete and satisfactory.
( c ) DOE shall select evaluators on the basis of their professional qualifications and expertise relating to the particular program activity being evaluated. ( 1 ) DOE anticipates that evaluators will primarily be DOE employees; but
( 2 ) If DOE uses non-DOE evaluators, DOE shall require them to comply with all applicable DOE rules or directives concerning the use of outside evaluators.
[61 FR 35895, July 8, 1996, as amended at 64 FR 46114, Aug. 24, 1999]
Exhibit 32.2


Certification of Chief Financial Officer Under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002








The undersigned officer of The First Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company") hereby certifies that the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010 to which this certification is being furnished as an exhibit (the "Report"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. This certification is provided pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K ("Item 601(b)(32)") promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"), and the Exchange Act. In accordance with clause (ii) of Item 601(b)(32), this certification (A) shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and (B) shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.





Date: May 7, 2010








/s/ F. Stephen Ward


F. Stephen Ward


Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer


The First Bancorp, Inc.
H. Res. 527 

In the House of Representatives, U.S., 

November 3, 2005. 

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule 

XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the 

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of 

the bill (H.R. 4128) to protect private property rights. The 

first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. All points of 

order against consideration of the bill are waived. General debate shall be confined to the bill and shall not exceed 90 minutes, with 60 minutes equally divided and controlled by the 

chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on 

the Judiciary and 30 minutes equally divided and controlled 

by the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on Agriculture. After general debate the bill shall be 

considered for amendment under the five-minute rule. It shall 

be in order to consider as an original bill for the purpose of 

amendment under the five-minute rule the amendment in the 

nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on the 

Judiciary now printed in the bill. The committee amendment 
2 

•HRES 527 EH 

in the nature of a substitute shall be considered as read. Notwithstanding clause 11 of rule XVIII, no amendment to the 

committee amendment in the nature of a substitute shall be 

in order except those printed in the report of the Committee 

on Rules accompanying this resolution. Each such amendment may be offered only in the order printed in the report, 

may be offered only by a Member designated in the report, 

shall be considered as read, shall be debatable for the time 

specified in the report equally divided and controlled by the 

proponent and an opponent, shall not be subject to amendment, and shall not be subject to a demand for division of 

the question in the House or in the Committee of the Whole. 

All points of order against such amendments are waived. At 

the conclusion of consideration of the bill for amendment the 

Committee shall rise and report the bill to the House with 

such amendments as may have been adopted. Any Member 

may demand a separate vote in the House on any amendment 

adopted in the Committee of the Whole to the bill or to the 

committee amendment in the nature of a substitute. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and 

amendments thereto to final passage without intervening mo-
3 

•HRES 527 EH 

tion except one motion to recommit with or without instructions. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
§ 54.33 Continuation of CLB and conditions of renewed license. ( a ) Whether stated therein or not, each renewed license will contain and otherwise be subject to the conditions set forth in 10 CFR 50.54.
( b ) Each renewed license will be issued in such form and contain such conditions and limitations, including technical specifications, as the Commission deems appropriate and necessary to help ensure that systems, structures, and components subject to review in accordance with § 54.21 will continue to perform their intended functions for the period of extended operation. In addition, the renewed license will be issued in such form and contain such conditions and limitations as the Commission deems appropriate and necessary to help ensure that systems, structures, and components associated with any time-limited aging analyses will continue to perform their intended functions for the period of extended operation.
( c ) Each renewed license will include those conditions to protect the environment that were imposed pursuant to 10 CFR 50.36b and that are part of the CLB for the facility at the time of issuance of the renewed license. These conditions may be supplemented or amended as necessary to protect the environment during the term of the renewed license and will be derived from information contained in the supplement to the environmental report submitted pursuant to 10 CFR part 51, as analyzed and evaluated in the NRC record of decision. The conditions will identify the obligations of the licensee in the environmental area, including, as appropriate, requirements for reporting and recordkeeping of environmental data and any conditions and monitoring requirements for the protection of the nonaquatic environment.
( d ) The licensing basis for the renewed license includes the CLB, as defined in § 54.3(a); the inclusion in the licensing basis of matters such as licensee commitments does not change the legal status of those matters unless specifically so ordered pursuant to paragraphs (b) or (c) of this section.
#### Media Boosters, Inc., Respondent, v Prelude Productions, Inc., et al., Appellants.

In an action to recover the reasonable value of services performed, in which a default judgment was entered in favor of plaintiff, defendants appeal (1) as limited by their notice of appeal and brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered July 5, 1979, as required the posting of a bond or other undertaking sufficient to secure the sum of $15,985.06, as a condition of vacatur of the default judgment, (2) from a further order of the same court, dated July 18, 1979, which granted partial summary. judgment to plaintiff against them in the sum of $11,650, with interest, and (3) from the judgment entered on the latter order on August 2, 1979. Order entered July 5, 1979 affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements. No opinion. Appeal from the order dated July 18, 1979 dismissed, without costs or disbursements (see *Matter of Aho,*39 NY2d 241, 248). Judgment reversed, without costs or disbursements, order dated July 18, 1979 vacated and plaintiff’s cross motion for summary judgment denied. Defendants’ letter of guarantee is ambiguous and raises questions of fact which must be decided at a trial. Hopkins, J. P., Lazer, Margett and O’Connor, JJ., concur.
#### § 603.610 Flow down requirements.

If it is an expenditure-based award, the TIA must require participants to provide the same financial management, property management, and purchasing systems requirements to a subrecipient that would apply if the subrecipient were a participant. For example, a for-profit participant would require a university subrecipient to comply with requirements that apply to a university participant and would require a GOCO or FFRDC subrecipient to comply with standards that conform as much as practicable with the requirements in the GOCO/FFRDC procurement contract. Note that this policy applies to subawards for substantive performance of portions of the RD&D project supported by the TIA and not to participants' purchases of goods or services needed to carry out the RD&D.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Cancer Institute Initial Review Group, Subcommittee G—Education.                    

*Date:*                         January 25, 2011.                    

*Time:*                         8 a.m. to 6 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         Hilton Washington/Rockville, 1750 Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD 20852.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Jeannette F. Korczak, PhD, Scientific Review Administrator, Resources and Training Review Branch, Division of Extramural Activities, National Cancer  nstitute, NIH, 6116 Executive Blvd., Room 8115,  Bthesda, MD 20892. 301-496-9767.                         *Korczakj@mail.nih.gov.*

                        (Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.392, Cancer Construction; 93.393, Cancer Cause and Prevention Research; 93.394, Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Research; 93.395, Cancer Treatment Research; 93.396, Cancer Biology                               ( print page 79011)                            Research; 93.397, Cancer Centers Support; 93.398, Cancer Research Manpower; 93.399, Cancer Control, National Institutes of Health, (HHS)                    

Dated: December 13, 2010.

Jennifer S. Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2010-31732 Filed 12-16-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P