alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 08-4506

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

 v. 

TORIANO HOIVEY BLOCKER, 

 Defendant - Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Columbia. Cameron McGowan Currie, District 

Judge. (3:07-cr-00466-CMC-l) 

Submitted: May 18, 2009 Decided: June 3, 2009 

Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Cameron B. Littlejohn, Jr., Columbia, South Carolina, for 

Appellant. Stanley Duane Ragsdale, Assistant United States 

Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
PER CURIAM: 

 Toriano Hoivey Blocker pled guilty pursuant to a 

written plea agreement to knowingly using or carrying a firearm 

during and in relation to a drug trafficking crime, in violation 

of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1) (2006) (Count Three), and conspiracy to 

possess with intent to distribute five grams or more of cocaine 

base, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(A), 846 

(2006) (Count Five). Blocker was sentenced to 270 months in 

prison. Blocker appealed. 

 Counsel for Blocker filed a brief in accordance with 

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), certifying that there 

are no meritorious grounds for appeal, but questioning whether 

the district court properly conducted Blocker’s guilty plea 

hearing. Blocker has filed a pro se supplemental brief. 

Finding no reversible error, we affirm. 

 In the absence of a motion to withdraw a guilty plea 

in the district court, we review for plain error the adequacy of 

the guilty plea proceeding under Fed. R. Crim. P. 11. United 

States v. Martinez, 277 F.3d 517, 525 (4th Cir. 2002). Our 

examination of the record shows that the district court fully 

complied with the requirements of Rule 11. Further, Blocker’s 

plea was knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently entered, and 

supported by a factual basis. We therefore find no error. 

2 
3 

 We have reviewed Blocker’s pro se informal brief and 

find no merit to his claims. In accordance with Anders, we have 

reviewed the record in this case and have found no meritorious 

issues for appeal. We therefore affirm the district court’s 

judgment. This court requires that counsel inform Blocker, in 

writing, of the right to petition the Supreme Court of the 

United States for further review. If Blocker requests that a 

petition be filed, but counsel believes that such a petition 

would be frivolous, then counsel may move in this court for 

leave to withdraw from representation. Counsel=s motion must 

state that a copy thereof was served on Blocker. 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process. 

AFFIRMED
IV 

House Calendar No. 113 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 539 

[Report No. 109–278] 

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 

bill (H.R. 2419) making appropriations for energy and water development 

for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2006, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 8, 2005 

Mr. HASTINGS of Washington, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered 

to be printed 

RESOLUTION 

Waiving points of order against the conference report to 

accompany the bill (H.R. 2419) making appropriations 

for energy and water development for the fiscal year 

ending September 30, 2006, and for other purposes. 

1 Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it 

2 shall be in order to consider the conference report to ac3 company the bill (H.R. 2419) making appropriations for 

4 energy and water development for the fiscal year ending 

5 September 30, 2006, and for other purposes. All points 
2 

HRES 539 RH 

1 of order against the conference report and against its con2 sideration are waived. The conference report shall be con3 sidered as read. 

House Calendar No. 113 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 539 

[Report No. 109–278] 

RESOLUTION 

Waiving points of order against the conference reand for other purposes. for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2006, appropriations for energy and water development port to accompany the bill (H.R. 2419) making 

NOVEMBER 8, 2005 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed
PGI 216.403-2 Fixed-price incentive (successive targets) contracts.       The formula specified in FAR 16.403-2(a)(1)(iii) does not apply for the life of the contract. It is used to fix the firm target profit for the contract. To provide an incentive consistent with the circumstances, the formula should reflect the relative risk involved in establishing an incentive arrangement where cost and pricing information were not sufficient to permit the negotiation of firm targets at the outset.    **Parent topic:** PGI 216.403 Fixed-price incentive contracts.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Balance
Sheet, Statement of Operations, Statements of Cash Flows and Notes thereto
incorporated in Part I, Item 1. of this Form 10-Q and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         197,309
<SECURITIES>                                   429,386
<RECEIVABLES>                                   48,815
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               680,709
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 984,052
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,338
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,649
<OTHER-SE>                                     970,839
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   984,052
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 9,688
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   33,653
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                13,293
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (37,258)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,500
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (39,758)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (39,758)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
You havereached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC)Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC.Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of catalogingand locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications.  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the eventthat publications are no longer available from the original publishing agencysite. (Historical purposes)
**Title:****FrontLines:linking alcohol services research and practice**** 
SuDocNumber:HE20.8329:
ItemNumber:0498-C-19(online)
CGPSystem Number:000597031
 
June2006
March2004 | September 2004
June2003
June2002 | November 2002
June2001
June2000 | November 2000
June1999
February 27, 2020**
EXHIBIT 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Dennis Vadura, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of AccuPoll Holding
Corp.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions);

(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.


May 20, 2005                                  /s/ Dennis Vadura
                                              ----------------------------------
                                                  Dennis Vadura
                                                  Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                5
<MULTIPLIER>             1,000
       
<S>                               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                     3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                 DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                      MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                 80,000
<SECURITIES>                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                         397,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                0
<INVENTORY>                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                      492,000
<PP&E>                              5,395,000
<DEPRECIATION>                      1,521,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                      4,366,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>              10,205,000
<BONDS>                                     0
<COMMON>                              426,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                  24,000
<PREFERRED>                            24,000
<OTHER-SE>                        (18,986,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>        4,366,000
<SALES>                                     0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                       11,000
<CGS>                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                         178,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                    295,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                      (462,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                  (462,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                         (462,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                           (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                           (0.02)

        


</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sionix Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
James J. Houtz, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350, as adopted pursuant ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ James J. Houtz
-----------------------------------
    James J. Houtz, President

February 23, 2004
###### Editorial Note on Part 61

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 61 appear at 80 FR 74980, Dec. 1, 2015, and at 81 FR 86909, Dec. 2, 2016.

#### § 61.42 Protection of individuals from inadvertent intrusion.

Design, operation, and closure of the land disposal facility must ensure protection of any individual inadvertently intruding into the disposal site and occupying the site or contacting the waste at any time after active institutional controls over the disposal site are removed.
#### In the Matter of the Commissioner of Social Services of the County of Erie, Appellant, v Daniel Gibson, Respondent.

Order unanimously reversed, with costs, petition granted and matter remitted to Family Court, Erie County, for further proceedings in accordance with the following memorandum: In its decision trial court assumed the truth of petitioner’s evidence, but made no specific finding. The court dismissed the petition as a matter of law for lack of expert testimony, because only 255 days elapsed between the alleged single act of sexual intercourse and the birth of the child, the court relying on *Matter of Suzanne “J”v Russell “K”*(46 AD2d 935). We agree that petitioner’s evidence in this case should be accepted as true. We hold, however, that the 255 days is within the practical range of the normal period of gestation, and that expert testimony is not required in this case *(Matter of Erie County Comr. of Social Servs. v Boyd,*74 AD2d 728; cf. *Jaynes v Tulla,*70 AD2d 680,682; and see *Matter of Morris v Terry K.,*70 AD2d 1031; *Matter of Leonard v Couse,*83 Misc 2d 631). On remission the court shall fix the amount which respondent must pay to *982petitioner for confinement expenses which it paid and for the support of the child from the date petitioner undertook such support to this date, and the support payments which respondent must make for the child until her maturity. (Appeal from order of Erie County Family Court — paternity.) Present — Simons, J. P., Hancock, Jr., Schnepp, Doerr and Witmer, JJ.
IV 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 617 

Supporting the goals and ideals of National Teen Dating Violence Awareness 

and Prevention Week. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 15, 2005 

Ms. MILLENDER-MCDONALD (for herself and Mrs. JOHNSON of Connecticut) 

submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee 

on Government Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Supporting the goals and ideals of National Teen Dating 

Violence Awareness and Prevention Week. 

Whereas 1 in 3 female high school students reports being 

physically abused or sexually abused by a dating partner; 

Whereas over 40 percent of male and female high school students surveyed had been victims of dating violence at 

least once; 

Whereas violent relationships in adolescence can have serious 

ramifications for victims, who are at higher risk for substance abuse, eating disorders, risky sexual behavior, suicide, and adult re-vicimization; 

Whereas the severity of violence among intimate partners has 

been shown to increase if the pattern was established in 

adolescence; 
2 

HRES 617 IH 

Whereas 81 percent of parents surveyed either believed dating violence is not a problem or admitted they did not 

know it is a problem; 

Whereas the week of February 6, 2006, has been recognized 

as an appropriate week for activities furthering awareness of teen dating violence; and 

Whereas recognizing a ‘‘National Teen Dating Violence 

Awareness and Prevention Week’’ would benefit schools, 

communities, and families regardless of socioeconomic 

status, race, or gender: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives should 

2 raise awareness of teen dating violence in the Nation by 

3 supporting the goals and ideals of National Teen Dating 

4 Violence Awareness and Prevention Week. 

Æ
THC MACT FLOOR ANALYSESCompany Location Kiln Average Kiln Type In-line raw millSuwannee Branford, FL Kiln 5.68 preheater/calciner yesHolcim Trident Kiln #1 5.69 wet noTXI Midlothian Kiln 5 5.83 preheater/calciner yesHolcim Mason City Kiln #3 10.90 long dry noHolcim Mason City Kiln #2 11.07 long dry noTitan Pennsuco Kiln 12.81 preheater/calciner yesTitan Roanoke, VA Kiln 5 12.93 preheater/calciner yesHolcim Theodore, AL Kiln #1 23.74 preheater/calciner yesHolcim Portland, CO Kiln #4 44.97 preheater/calciner yesHolcim DundeeKiln #1 and Kiln #2Combined748.15 wet no
PGI 233.171 Reporting requirement for

protests of solicitations or awards.

The Protest Tracker on the Procurement Integrated Enterprise Environment (PIEE) (accessible at

https://wawf.eb.mil/) is the bid protest data repository required by section 822(c) of the National

Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 (Pub. L. 115-232). When protests involving the same

contract or proposed award, valued at any amount, have been filed at both the Government

Accountability Office and the United States Court of Federal Claims (COFC), the contracting officer

shall report the protest information required in the Protest Tracker no later than 10 days after the

outcome of the protest at the COFC. Instructions on reporting protest information in the Protest

Tracker are available on the PIEE webpage.

Parent topic: PGI 233.1 -PROTESTS
#### § 590.301 General.

The procedures of this subpart are applicable to proceedings conducted on all applications or other requested actions filed under this part. The Assistant Secretary may conduct all aspects of the procedures of this subpart or may designate a presiding official pursuant to § 590.314.
§ 707.13 Medical review of results of tests for illegal drug use. ( a ) All test results shall be submitted for medical review by the MRO. A confirmed positive test for drugs shall consist of an initial test performed by the immunoassay method, with positive results on that initial test confirmed by another test, performed by the gas chromatography/mass spectrometry method (GC/MS). This procedure is described in the HHS Mandatory Guidelines.
( b ) The Medical Review Officer will consider the medical history of the employee or applicant, as well as any other relevant biomedical information. When there is a confirmed positive test result, the employee or applicant will be given an opportunity to report to the MRO the use of any prescription or over-the-counter medication. If the MRO determines that there is a legitimate medical explanation for a confirmed positive test result, consistent with legal and non-abusive drug use, the MRO will certify that the test results do not meet the conditions for a determination of use of illegal drugs. If no such certification can be made, the MRO will make a determination of use of illegal drugs. Determinations of use of illegal drugs will be made in accordance with the criteria provided in the Medical Review Officer Manual issued by the Department of Health and Human Services.
[57 FR 32656, July 22, 1992, as amended at 80 FR 5008, Jan. 30, 2015]
Order entered September 6, 2016

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-16-00624-CR

No. 05-16-00625-CR

JAMAL DESMOND MCCLENTON, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 2

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. F11-26246-I, F16-75306-I

ORDER

Appellant’s August 30, 2016 motion seeking appointment of an “MHR lawyer” is before 

the Court. Our records show that on May 23, 2016, appellant was adjudicated guilty of 

aggravated robbery with a deadly weapon and found guilty of attempted theft of an automated 

teller machine containing less than $300,000. In both cases, punishment was assessed at ten 

years’ imprisonment. Before the plea and adjudication hearing, appellant signed documents 

indicating he was waiving appointment of counsel. Nevertheless, the trial court determined that 

appellant was indigent and appointed Bethany Stephens as counsel for appellant. Stephens 

represented appellant during the plea and adjudication hearing. 
On June 1, 2016, appellant filed a pro se notice of appeal. There is no indication in our 

records that counsel has been appointed to represent appellant on appeal. No docketing statement 

has been filed, and the reporter’s record is overdue.

The Court GRANTS appellant’s motion to the extent we ORDER the trial court to 

conduct a hearing to determine whether appellant remains indigent and would be entitled to the 

appointment of appellate counsel. In the event the trial court determines appellant is entitled to 

appointment of counsel, we ORDER the trial court to appoint counsel for appellant.

We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record of the proceedings, which shall include 

the order appointing counsel or else written findings showing appellant is not entitled to counsel, 

to this Court within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this order.

This appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with the above order. The 

appeal shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are 

received, whichever is earlier.

/s/ ADA BROWN 

JUSTICE
936 A.2d 342

#### In The Matter of the REINSTATEMENT OF Jeffrey S. MARCALUS to the Bar of Maryland.

Misc. AG Docket AG No 41,

Sept.Term 2007.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Nov. 30, 2007.

ORDER

The Court having considered the Petition of Jeffrey S. Marcalus for Reinstatement and the response of Bar Counsel filed thereto, it is this 30th day of November, 2007

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the petition be, and it is hereby, GRANTED, and the petitioner, Jeffrey S. Marcalus, is reinstated to the practice of law in this State, and it is further

ORDERED, that the Clerk of the Court shall replace the name of Jeffrey S. Marcalus upon the register of attorneys entitled to practice law in this State and certify that fact to the Trustees of the Client Protection Fund and the Clerks of all judicial tribunals in this State.