alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Archon Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q
for the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, Paul W. Lowden, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and John M. Garner, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003, that to our knowledge:



| | (i) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                            
|--------------------------------------------
|Date: May 12, 2006                          
|                                            
|/s/ Paul W. Lowden                          
|Paul W. Lowden                              
|Chairman of the Board and President         
|(Principal Executive Officer)               
|                                            
|/s/ John M. Garner                          
|John M. Garner                              
|Chief Financial Officer                     
|(Principal Accounting and Financial Officer)

This certification accompanies the above-described Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by

such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
#### David Podgers, Appellant, v. Niagara County Board of Elections, Respondent.

Order unanimously affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: We conclude that the decision of County Court was correct. We pass on no other question. (Order entered June 9, 1969.) (Appeal from order of Niagara Comity Court denying motion to place name on ballot.) Present— Del Yecchio, J. P., Witmer, Gabrielli, Bastow and Henry, JJ.
§ 501.31 Written comments. ( a ) *New facilities.* Except as may be provided elsewhere in these regulations, OFE shall provide a period of at least forty-five (45) days, commencing with publication of the Notice of Acceptance of Petition, of in the case of certification exemptions, Notice of Acceptance and availability of Certification, in the Federal Register in accordance with § 501.63(a), for submission of written comments concerning a petition for an exemption. Written comments shall be made in accordance with § 501.7.
( b ) *Existing facilities.* Except as may be provided elsewhere in these regulations, OFE shall provide a period of at least 45 days for submission of written comments concerning a proposed prohibition rule or order or a petition for a permit. In the case of a proposed prohibition rule or order issued to an existing electing powerplant, OFE shall also provide for a period of at least 45 days for submission of written comments concerning a Tentative Staff Analysis. This period shall commence on the day after publication of the Notice of Availability of the Tentative Staff Analysis in the Federal Register. In the case of prohibition order proceedings for certifying powerplants under section 301 of FUA, as amended, OFE shall provide a period of at least 45 days, beginning the day after the Notice of Acceptance of certification is published, for submission of written comments concerning the certification and OFE's proposed prohibition order, and requests for public hearings. Prohibition order proceedings under section 301, as amended by OBRA, will have only one period of 45 days, since no Tentative Staff Analysis will be prepared. The comment period may be extended by OFE in accordance with § 501.7. See § 501.52(b) of this part for further information with respect to the comment period. Written comments shall be filed in accordance with § 501.7.
(Department of Energy Organization Act, Pub. L. 95-91, 91 Stat. 565 (42 U.S.C. 7101 *et seq.*); Powerplant and Industrial Fuel Use Act of 1978, Pub. L. 95-620, 92 Stat. 3289 (42 U.S.C. 8301 *et seq.*); Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1981 (Pub. L. 97-35); E.O. 12009, 42 FR 46267, Sept. 15, 1977)
[46 FR 59889, Dec. 7, 1981, as amended at 47 FR 50848, Nov. 10, 1982; 54 FR 52892, Dec. 22, 1989]
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
You havereached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC)Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC.Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of catalogingand locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications.  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the eventthat publications are no longer available from the original publishing agencysite. (Historical purposes)
**Title:****Si trabaja porcuenta propia**** 
SuDocNumber:SSA1.19:SE 4/, SSA 1.19/4:
ItemNumber:0517-E-09(online)
CGPSystem Number: 000583653
 - 1996199719982000200120022003200420052006200820092011201220132014201520162017
 **
IV 

House Calendar No. 93 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 420 

[Report No. 109–230] 

Directing the Attorney General to transmit to the House of Representatives 

not later than 14 days after the date of the adoption of this resolution 

documents in the possession of the Attorney General relating to the 

disclosure of the identity and employment of Ms. Valerie Plame. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 29, 2005 

Mr. HOLT (for himself, Mr. INSLEE, and Mr. GRIJALVA) submitted the 

following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

SEPTEMBER 22, 2005 

Additional sponsors: Mr. CONYERS, Mr. KUCINICH, Mr. TIERNEY, Mr. 

MCDERMOTT, Mr. ACKERMAN, Mr. DEFAZIO, Mr. HINCHEY, Mr. 

DELAHUNT, Mr. DOYLE, Mr. UDALL of Colorado, Mr. VISCLOSKY, Mr. 

MCGOVERN, Mr. PALLONE, Ms. LEE, Ms. MATSUI, Mr. CROWLEY, Mr. 

SMITH of Washington, and Ms. BERKLEY

SEPTEMBER 22, 2005 

Reported adversely from the Committee on the Judiciary, referred to the 

House Calendar, and ordered to be printed 

RESOLUTION 

Directing the Attorney General to transmit to the House 

of Representatives not later than 14 days after the date 

of the adoption of this resolution documents in the pos-
2 

•HRES 420 RH 

session of the Attorney General relating to the disclosure 

of the identity and employment of Ms. Valerie Plame. 

1 Resolved, That the Attorney General is directed to 

2 transmit to the House of Representatives not later than 

3 the date that is 14 days after the date of the adoption 

4 of this resolution, all documents, including telephone and 

5 electronic mail records, logs and calendars, personnel 

6 records, and records of internal discussions in the posses7 sion of the Attorney General relating to the disclosure of 

8 the identity of Ms. Valerie Plame as an employee of the 

9 Central Intelligence Agency during the period beginning 

10 on May 6, 2003, and ending on July 31, 2003. 

House Calendar No. 93 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 420 

[Report No. 109–230] 

RESOLUTION 

Directing the Attorney General to transmit to the 

employment of Ms. Valerie Plame. eral relating to the disclosure of the identity and documents in the possession of the Attorney Genafter the date of the adoption of this resolution House of Representatives not later than 14 days 

SEPTEMBER 22, 2005 

Reported adversely from the Committee on the Judiciary, 

printed referred to the House Calendar, and ordered to be
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>6
<LEGEND> THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED 
FROM THE FORM 10-Q AS OF MARCH 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY 
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
<MULTIPLIER>1
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                  MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       3-MOS
<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST>             527,568
<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE>          1,733,839
<RECEIVABLES>                           0
<ASSETS-OTHER>                      1,862
<OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS>               10,924
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  1,746,625
<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES>                0
<SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT>                 0
<OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES>         101,732
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES>               101,732
<SENIOR-EQUITY>                         0
<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON>          438,622
<SHARES-COMMON-STOCK>             106,990
<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR>             106,990
<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT>               0
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII>                  0
<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS>                 0
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS>                0
<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC>        1,206,271
<NET-ASSETS>                    1,644,893
<DIVIDEND-INCOME>                       0
<INTEREST-INCOME>                     668
<OTHER-INCOME>                          0
<EXPENSES-NET>                    116,810
<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME>          (116,142)
<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT>                0
<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT>               0
<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS>            (116,142)
<EQUALIZATION>                          0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME>               0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS>                0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER>                   0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD>                 0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED>             0
<SHARES-REINVESTED>                     0
<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS>           (116,142)
<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR>                 0
<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR>               0
<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR>                 0
<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR>              0
<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES>               8,805
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      0
<GROSS-EXPENSE>                   116,810
<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS>            1,702,964
<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN>                   6
<PER-SHARE-NII>                        (1)
<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC>                 0 <F1>
<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND>                    0
<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS>               0
<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL>                    0
<PER-SHARE-NAV-END>                     5
<EXPENSE-RATIO>                      6.86
<AVG-DEBT-OUTSTANDING>                  0
<AVG-DEBT-PER-SHARE>                    0
<FN>
A zero value is used since the change in net unrealized fair value is not 
allocated to General Partners and Limited Partners as it is not taxable.
</FN>

</TABLE>
#### NEW YORK CENT. & H. R. R. CO. v. ANDREANO et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

May 27, 1914.)

Action by the New York Central & Hudson River Railroad against Nellie Andrea-no and others.

No opinion. Appeal dismissed, without costs, upon stipulation filed.
Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

I, Brian F. Lavin, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

To the best of my knowledge and belief, the quarterly report on Form 10-Q filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on May 15, 2003, by NTS-Properties VI, a Maryland Limited
Partnership and to which this certification is appended (the "Periodic Report") fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information
contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of NTS-Properties VI, a Maryland Limited Partnership.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
NTS-Properties VI, a Maryland Limited Partnership and will be retained by NTS-Properties VI, a
Maryland Limited Partnership and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.

/s/ Brian F. Lavin
President of NTS Capital Corporation,
General Partner of NTS-Properties Associates VI,
General Partner of NTS-Properties VI, a Maryland Limited Partnership
#### § 603.555 Value of other contributions.

For types of participant contributions other than those addressed in §§ 603.535 through 603.550, the general rule is that the contracting officer is to value each contribution consistently with the cost principles or standards in § 603.625 and § 603.635 that apply to the participant making the contribution. When valuing services and property donated by parties other than the participants, the contracting officer may use as guidance the provisions of 10 CFR 600.313(b)(2) through (b)(5).
Amended Schedule 2.1 of Directors' Deferred Compensation and Benefits Trust Agt



 Exhibit 10.22 
 Schedule 2.1 
 to the 
 Directors’ Deferred Compensation and Benefits 
 Trust Agreement 
 Benefit Plans and Other Arrangements Subject to Trust

 (1) Sunoco, Inc. Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan I; 
 (2) Sunoco, Inc. Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan II; 
 (3) The entire funding for all the Indemnification Agreements with the directors set forth below shall be Five Million Dollars
($5,000,000.00) in the aggregate upon a Potential Change in Control, and an amount upon a Change in Control calculated on the basis of the Indemnification Agreements with the following directors: 
  

	 	(a)	 Robert J. Darnall 4
 



	 	(b)	 John G. Drosdick 1
 



	 	(c)	Gary W. Edwards 


	 	(d)	Ursula O. Fairbairn 


	 	(e)	Thomas P. Gerrity 


	 	(f)	Rosemarie B. Greco 


	 	(g)	John P. Jones, III 


	 	(h)	James G. Kaiser 


	 	(i)	 R. Anderson Pew 2 



	 	(j)	 G. Jackson Ratcliffe 3
 



	 	(k)	John W. Rowe 


	 	(l)	John K. Wulff 

 (4) Benefits
payable to former directors of the Company (or their beneficiaries) in pay status as of the date of termination of the Sunoco, Inc. Non-Employee Directors’ Retirement Plan. 
  
 NOTES: 
  

	1.	Mr. Drosdick resigned as a Director of Sunoco, Inc., effective December 31, 2008. 


	2.	Mr. Pew did not stand for re-election at the Annual Meeting on May 7, 2009, due to Sunoco, Inc.’s mandatory retirement policy for directors.



	3.	Mr. Ratcliffe did not stand for re-election at the Annual Meeting on May 7, 2009, due to Sunoco, Inc.’s mandatory retirement policy for directors.



	4.	Mr. Darnall will not be standing for re-election at the Annual Meeting on May 6, 2010, due to Sunoco, Inc.’s mandatory retirement policy for directors.
Case 2:06-cv-00754-WC Document 1 Filed 08/23/2006 Page 1 of 5
Case 2:06-cv-00754-WC Document 1 Filed 08/23/2006 Page 2 of 5
Case 2:06-cv-00754-WC Document 1 Filed 08/23/2006 Page 3 of 5
Case 2:06-cv-00754-WC Document 1 Filed 08/23/2006 Page 4 of 5
Case 2:06-cv-00754-WC Document 1 Filed 08/23/2006 Page 5 of 5
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth ___________________________

No. 02-20-00158-CR

___________________________

On Appeal from Criminal District Court No. 3

Tarrant County, Texas

Trial Court No. 1644029

Before Bassel, Womack, and Wallach, JJ.

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

EX PARTE REKEEM LACLINTON DORY
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

After receiving Appellant Rekeem LaClinton Dory’s pro se notice of appeal, we 

sent a letter on November 13, 2020, stating our concern that we lacked jurisdiction 

over this appeal because we had been informed by the trial court clerk that the trial 

judge had not signed an order in this case. We gave the parties ten days from the date 

of our letter to furnish this court with a signed copy of the order that Appellant seeks 

to appeal. We stated that “[i]f no order has been signed and furnished by that date, 

this appeal will be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f).” We 

received no response and confirmed with the trial court clerk that no order had been 

signed as of December 4, 2020.

The rules of appellate procedure provide that a criminal defendant has the right 

to appeal a judgment of guilt or other appealable order. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2). 

However, there is no appealable order in this case, making Appellant’s notice of 

appeal premature. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2), 26.2(a)(1), 27.1(b). Accordingly, we 

dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f); McCain v. State, 

No. 02-13-00599-CR, 2014 WL 670640, at *1 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth Feb. 20, 2014, 

no pet.) (per curiam) (mem. op., not designated for publication) (dismissing appeal for 

lack of jurisdiction because notice of appeal was premature).

Per Curiam

Do Not Publish

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)
3

Delivered: December 17, 2020
IV 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 408

Requesting the President and directing the Secretary of Defense to transmit 

to the House of Representatives not later than 14 days after the date 

of the adoption of this resolution all documents in the possession of 

the President and Secretary of Defense relating to communications with 

officials of the United Kingdom relating to the policy of the United 

States with respect to Iraq. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 28, 2005

Mr. HINCHEY submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on International Relations 

RESOLUTION

Requesting the President and directing the Secretary of Defense to transmit to the House of Representatives not 

later than 14 days after the date of the adoption of 

this resolution all documents in the possession of the 

President and Secretary of Defense relating to communications with officials of the United Kingdom relating 

to the policy of the United States with respect to Iraq.

1 Resolved, That not later than 14 days after the date 

2 of the adoption of this resolution—

3 (1) the President is requested to transmit to 

4 the House of Representatives all documents, includ-
2

•HRES 408 IH 

1 ing telephone and electronic mail records, logs, cal2 endars, minutes, and memos, in the possession of 

3 the President relating to communications with offi4 cials of the United Kingdom from January 1, 2001, 

5 to March 19, 2003, relating to the policy of the 

6 United States with respect to Iraq, including any 

7 discussions or communications between the Presi8 dent, then National Security Advisor Condoleezza 

9 Rice, or other Administration officials and officials 

10 of the United Kingdom; and 

11 (2) the Secretary of Defense is directed to 

12 transmit to the House of Representatives all docu13 ments, including telephone and electronic mail 

14 records, logs, calendars, minutes, and memos, in the 

15 possession of the Secretary relating to communica16 tions with officials of the United Kingdom from Jan17 uary 1, 2001, to March 19, 2003, relating to the 

18 policy of the United States with respect to Iraq, in19 cluding any discussions or communications between 

20 any Defense Department official, including Under 

21 Secretary of Defense for Policy Douglas J. Feith 

22 and Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence Dr. 

23 Stephen A. Cambone, and officials of the United 

24 Kingdom.

Æ
Fifth Amendment to the Service Agreement



 Exhibit 10.40C 
 FIFTH AMENDMENT TO SERVICE AGREEMENT 
 This Fifth
Amendment (this “Amendment”) to the Services Agreement made and entered into this 21st day of February, 2010 (the “Effective Date”), by and between First Data Technologies, Inc. (“FDT”) and CSG Systems, Inc.
(“CSG”). 
 W I T N E S S E T H: 
 WHEREAS, CSG and FDT entered into a Service Agreement dated as of December 1, 2000, as previously amended (the “Service Agreement”); and 
 WHEREAS, CSG and FDT desire to hereby amend the Service Agreement as hereinafter more particularly set forth. 
 NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing mutual promises contained herein, CSG and FDT hereby agree, as of the Effective
Date, as follows: 
 1. Section 1.33 of the Service Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following: 

“‘Original Term’ means the period of time commencing on the Effective Date and ending June 30, 2010. The Original Term
shall automatically extend for up to six successive one (1) month extension periods expiring no later than December 31, 2010, unless CSG provides FDT written notice at least forty-five (45) days prior to the expiration date of the
Original Term or the then-current extension period that the Original Term will not be further extended. All references to June 30, 2010 shall be interpreted to mean through the end of the Original Term.” 
 2. As hereby amended and supplemented, the Service Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the Parties hereto has caused this Amendment to the Services Agreement to be executed as of the date
first written above. 
  

			
	CSG SYSTEMS, INC.
		
	Signed By:	 	/s/ Bret C. Griess


			
		
	Print Name:	 	Bret C. Griess
		 	


			
		
	Title:	 	EVP

  
  
  

			
	FIRST DATA TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
		
	Signed By:	 	/s/ Randall Roumillat


			
		
	Print Name:	 	Randall Roumillat


			
		
	Title:	 	SVP-GIO
2007-2054.

#### State v. Bryant.

Butler App. No. CA2007-05-130. On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied.

Pfeifer and Cupp, JJ., dissent.
Docket No. FAA-2012-1071

. Contacts. With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed? 

Organization Person Contacted Date Response 

National Business Aircraft Association Eli Cotti 4/3/12

Regional Airline Association 4/3/12

Aircraft Owners & Pilots Association Robert Hackman 4/3/12

ATA M Lopez 4/3/12
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsBOREAS TE-10 Leaf Optical PropertiesThe Boreal Ecosystem-Atmospheric Study (BOREAS) TE-10 (Terrestrial Ecology) team collected several data sets in support of its efforts to characterize and interpret information on the reflectance, transmittance, gas exchange, oxygen evolution, and biochemical properties of boreal vegetation. This data set describes the spectral optical properties (reflectance and transmittance) of boreal forest conifers and broadleaf tree leaves as measured with a Spectron Engineering SE590 spectroradiometer at the Southern Study Area Old Black Spruce (SSA OBS), Old Jack Pine (OJP), Young Jack Pine (YJP), Old Aspen (OA), Old Aspen Auxiliary (OA-AUX), Young Aspen Auxiliary (YA-AUX), and Young Aspen (YA) sites. The data were collected during the growing seasons of 1994 and 1996 and are stored in tabular ASCII files. The data files are available on a CD-ROM (see document number 20010000884), or from the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) Distributed Active Archive Center (DAAC).Document ID20010004230Acquisition SourceGoddard Space Flight CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsHall, Forrest G.*(NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt, MD United States)*Papagno, Andrea*(Raytheon Information Technology and Scientific Services Greenbelt, MD United States)*Chan, Stephen S.*(NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt, MD United States)*Middleton, Elizabeth*(NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt, MD United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 7, 2013Publication DateOctober 1, 2000Subject CategoryEarth Resources And Remote SensingReport/Patent NumberNASA/TM-2000-209891/VOL162NAS 1.15:209891/VOL162Rept-2000-03136-0/VOL162Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 462-33-01Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20010004230.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024