alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 455.63 Cost-effectiveness testing. ( a ) This paragraph applies to calculation of the simple payback period of energy conservation measures. ( 1 ) The simple payback period of each energy conservation measure (except measures to shift demand, or renewable resource measures) shall be calculated, taking into account the interactions among the various measures, by dividing the estimated total cost of the measure, as determined pursuant to § 455.62(d)(3)(ii), by the estimated annual cost savings accruing from the measure (adjusted for demand charges), as determined pursuant to § 455.62(d)(3)(vi), provided that: ( i ) At least 50 percent of the annual cost savings used in this calculation shall be from the cost of the energy to be saved or a higher percent if required by a State in its State Plan pursuant to § 455.20(u)(3); and
( ii ) No more than 50 percent of the annual cost savings used in this calculation shall be from other cost savings, such as those resulting from energy conservation maintenance and operating procedures related to particular energy conservation measures, or from changes in type of fuel used, or a lower percent if required by a State in its State Plan pursuant to § 455.20(u)(3).
( 2 ) The simple payback period of each renewable resource energy conservation measure shall be calculated, taking into account the interactions among the various measures, by dividing the estimated total cost of the measure, as determined pursuant to § 455.62(d)(3)(ii), by the estimated annual cost savings accruing from the measure taking into account at least the annual cost of the non-renewable fuels displaced less the annual cost of the renewable fuel, if any, and the annual cost of any backup non-renewable fuel needed to operate the system, adjusted for demand charges, as determined pursuant to § 455.62(d)(3)(vi).
( 3 ) The simple payback period of each energy conservation measure designed to shift demand to a period of lower demand and lower cost shall be calculated, taking into account the interactions among the various measures, by dividing the estimated total cost of the measure, as determined pursuant to § 455.62(d)(3)(ii), by the estimated annual cost savings accruing from the measure taking into account at least the annual cost of the energy used before the measure is installed less the estimated annual cost of the energy to be used after the measure is installed, adjusted for demand charges, as determined pursuant to § 455.62(d)(3)(vi).
( b ) This paragraph applies, in addition to paragraph (a) of this section, if the State plan requires the cost effectiveness of an energy conservation measure to be determined by life-cycle cost analysis or if the applicant requests such an analysis. ( 1 ) A life-cycle cost analysis, showing a savings-to-investment ratio greater than or equal to one over the useful life of the energy conservation measure or 15 years, whichever is less, shall be conducted in accordance with the requirements set forth in the State Plan pursuant to §§ 455.20(u)(2), 455.20(u)(3) and § 455.64.
( 2 ) The resulting savings-to-investment ratio shall be used for the purpose of ranking applications.
#### CITY OF BUFFALO, Appellant, v. GRAHAM et al., Respondents.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

November 25, 1914.)

Action by the City of Buffalo against Clara Graham and others.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. It is stated in the record that the facts are not in dispute, but the evidence is not contained in the record, and the answer denies the allegations of the complaint respecting the violation of the ordinance. It cannot, therefore, be held that the dismissal of the complaint was improper, even assuming that the ordinance was effective.
HELENA CHEMICAL COMPANY

7576 North Ingram

Suite 101

Fresno, CA 93711

Telephone: 559/261-9030

Facsimile: 559/261-9250

May 21, 2012

Linda Irokawa-Otani, Regulations Coordinator

Department of Pesticide Regulation

1001 I Street, P.O. Box 4015

Sacramento, California 95812-4015

RE: Proposed Non-Fumigant VOC Regulations

Dear Ms. Irokawa-Otani:

I am writing in response to your proposed VOC regulations for Non-Fumigant products. As a

retailer located in the Central Valley of California, I find many problems with your proposal.

First, GoalTender and other low VOC oxyfluorfen formulations are NOT viable substitutes for

Goal2XL and other EC oxyfluorfen products. My company has over 20 years experience

working with Goal2XL and over 10 years working with GoalTender. When it comes to post

emergence weed control, GoalTender is not a substitute. Our experience in the field and

orchard is that Goal2XL is the only formulation that controls hard to control weeds like malva,

and helps with glyphosate resistant weeds.

I have reviewed your list of "kickers" and their cost as it pertains to making GoalTender an

effective post emergence product. Reliable data does not exist that supports your position that

these "kickers" are the answer to using GoalTender in place of Goa12XL. Glyphosate is not an

effective tank mix partner due to the fact that glyphosate is already the foundation of the spray

mix. Adding a pint of glyphosate will do nothing for resistant weeds and hard to control

weeds. Paraquat is a Restricted Use Pesticide due to acute toxicity. Human toxicity and worker

exposure concerns make paraquat an extremely poor choice. The most likely "kickers" to be

added to GoalTender are Rely and Treevix. Rely costs $46/ acre and was in short supply in

2012. Treevix costs $16/ acre and the label recommends the addition of Goal to broaden the

spectrum. With additional regulatory requirements you are putting our California growers in a

non-competitive position versus other U.S, producers, let alone the global position we have to

compete with.
Lastly, please allow me to comment on the administrative burden that these regulations push

upon our business and our people. Providing written information on the VOC regulations,

tracking the intended use period, providing written recommendations and maintaining records

for two years adds costs to our business. We will in turn be forced to pass these costs on to our

grower customers. This is addition to the $20 to $50per acre calculated above.

We need Goal2XL in our summer post emergent weed control programs. Its elimination will

result in significant cost increases and decreased weed control in orchards and vineyards. Tills

decreased weed control could even result in additional trips across the field with a tractor and

sprayer. Have you considered the effect of additional VOC loading from additional spray trips?

We respectfully request that you find a way to keep Goa12XLand other ECformulations

available during the post emergent market months of May through October.

Best Regards,

Steven E. Alexander

Vice President

Helena Chemical Company
###### Editorial Note on Part 35

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 35 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

#### § 35.3067 Report of a leaking source.

A licensee shall file a report within 5 days if a leak test required by § 35.67 reveals the presence of 185 Bq (0.005 μCi) or more of removable contamination. The report must be filed with the appropriate NRC Regional Office listed in § 30.6 of this chapter, by an appropriate method listed in § 30.6(a) of this chapter, with a copy to the Director, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards. The written report must include the model number and serial number, if assigned, of the leaking source; the radionuclide and its estimated activity; the results of the test; the date of the test; and the action taken.

[73 FR 5720, Jan. 31, 2008]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         675,760
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               675,760
<PP&E>                                         161,151
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 940,733
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          540,638
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        49,380
<OTHER-SE>                                     350,715
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   940,733
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,558,976
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              22,341
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,563,185)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,563,185)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,563,185)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.04)


</TABLE>
§ 1049.7 Exercise of arrest authority—Use of deadly force. ( a ) The use of deadly force is authorized only under exigent circumstances where the Protective Force Officer reasonably believes that such force is necessary to: ( 1 ) Protect himself from an imminent threat of death or from serious bodily harm;
( 2 ) Protect any person or persons in or upon the SPR from an imminent threat of death or serious bodily harm.
( b ) If circumstances require the use of a firearm by a Protective Force Officer, the Officer shall give a verbal warning (*e.g.,* an order to halt), if feasible. A Protective Force Officer shall not fire warning shots under any circumstances.
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------


                   Certification of Periodic Financial Report
                   ------------------------------------------

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, the undersigned, Louis P. Scheps, the President and
Chief Executive Officer, and Jeffery A. Baird, the Chief Financial Officer of
CAS Medical Systems, Inc., (the "issuer"), do hereby certify that the report on
Form 10-QSB accompanying this certification (the "report") fully complies with
the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that information contained in the report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the issuer.



/s/ Louis P. Scheps
------------------------------------------------------------
Louis P. Scheps
Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer
CAS Medical Systems, Inc.
May 13, 2004



/s/ Jeffery A. Baird
------------------------------------------------------------
Jeffery A. Baird
Chief Financial Officer
CAS Medical Systems, Inc.
May 13, 2004
**EXHIBIT 32.2******

----

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL      FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002 

| In connection      with the Quarterly Report of SEDONA Corporation on Form 10-Q for the quarter      ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission      on the date hereof (the "Quarterly Report"), I, Anita M. Primo, Chief Financial      Officer of SEDONA Corporation certify, pursuant Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley    Act of 2002, that: |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (1) The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements    of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |
| (2)      The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of    SEDONA Corporation.                                                                                                                                                                                            |

|         |   |                                       |   |
|--------------|--------|--------------------------------------------|--------|
| May 14, 2004 |   | /s/ ANITA M. PRIMO                         |   |
|         |   |                                            |   |
|         |   | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |   |
|         |   | (Principal Financial Officer)              |   |

20

----
Editorial Note on Part 34
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 34 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

§ 34.29 Quarterly inventory. ( a ) Each licensee shall conduct a quarterly physical inventory to account for all sealed sources and for devices containing depleted uranium received and possessed under this license.
( b ) The licensee shall maintain records of the quarterly inventory in accordance with § 34.69.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, 

NORTHERN DIVISION

J.B., a minor child, by and through his )

next friend, ADDIE WARD, on behalf of )

himself and all other similarly situated; )

) Case No: 2:06-CV-755-MHT

Plaintiff, ) CLASS ACTION

)

vs. )

)

WALTER WOOD, in his individual )

capacity, )

)

Defendant. )

J.B., a minor child, by and through his )

next friend, ADDIE WARD, on behalf of )

himself and all other similarly situated; )

) Case No: 2:06-CV-908-MHT

Plaintiff, ) CLASS ACTION

)

vs. )

)

WALTER WOOD, in his individual )

capacity, )

)

Defendant. )

MOTION TO SUBSTITUTE DOCUMENT

COMES NOW, the Defendant, by and through his attorney, and requests that exhibit 1 of

Document 30, Brief In Support of Summary Judgment, be replaced with the attached redacted

document.

Done this 9 day of July 2007. th

Respectfully submitted

TROY KING

Case 2:06-cv-00755-MHT-CSC Document 36 Filed 07/09/2007 Page 1 of 2
ATTORNEY GENERAL

s/ T. Dudley Perry, Jr. 

T. Dudley Perry, Jr.

Bar Number: 3985-R67T

Deputy Attorney General

Alabama Department of Youth Services

Post Office Box 66

Mt. Meigs, AL 36057

Telephone: (334) 215-3803

Fax: (334) 215-3872

E-Mail: dudley.perry@dys.alabama.gov

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on the 9th day of July, 2007, I electronically filed the forgoing

Motion to Substitute Document, with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which

will send notification of such filing to the following:

Michael J. Crow, Esq.

Beasley, Allen

Post Office Box 4160

Montgomery, AL 36103-4160

Robert D. Drummond, Jr., Esq

Attorney At Law

323 De La Mare Avenue

Fairhope, AL 36532

s/T. Dudley Perry, Jr. 

T. Dudley Perry, Jr.

Deputy Attorney General

Alabama Department of Youth Services

Case 2:06-cv-00755-MHT-CSC Document 36 Filed 07/09/2007 Page 2 of 2
Case 2:06-cv-00755-MHT-CSC Document 36-2 Filed 07/09/2007 Page 1 of 17
Case 2:06-cv-00755-MHT-CSC Document 36-2 Filed 07/09/2007 Page 2 of 17
Case 2:06-cv-00755-MHT-CSC Document 36-2 Filed 07/09/2007 Page 3 of 17
Case 2:06-cv-00755-MHT-CSC Document 36-2 Filed 07/09/2007 Page 4 of 17
Case 2:06-cv-00755-MHT-CSC Document 36-2 Filed 07/09/2007 Page 5 of 17
Case 2:06-cv-00755-MHT-CSC Document 36-2 Filed 07/09/2007 Page 6 of 17
Case 2:06-cv-00755-MHT-CSC Document 36-2 Filed 07/09/2007 Page 7 of 17
Case 2:06-cv-00755-MHT-CSC Document 36-2 Filed 07/09/2007 Page 8 of 17
Case 2:06-cv-00755-MHT-CSC Document 36-2 Filed 07/09/2007 Page 9 of 17
Case 2:06-cv-00755-MHT-CSC Document 36-2 Filed 07/09/2007 Page 10 of 17
Case 2:06-cv-00755-MHT-CSC Document 36-2 Filed 07/09/2007 Page 11 of 17
Case 2:06-cv-00755-MHT-CSC Document 36-2 Filed 07/09/2007 Page 12 of 17
Case 2:06-cv-00755-MHT-CSC Document 36-2 Filed 07/09/2007 Page 13 of 17
Case 2:06-cv-00755-MHT-CSC Document 36-2 Filed 07/09/2007 Page 14 of 17
Case 2:06-cv-00755-MHT-CSC Document 36-2 Filed 07/09/2007 Page 15 of 17
Case 2:06-cv-00755-MHT-CSC Document 36-2 Filed 07/09/2007 Page 16 of 17
Case 2:06-cv-00755-MHT-CSC Document 36-2 Filed 07/09/2007 Page 17 of 17
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 237 (Friday, December 10, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 76999]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-31116]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT

[Docket No. FR-5415-N-36]


Notice of Availability: Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA) for 
HUD's Fiscal Year (FY) 2010 Capacity Building for Community Development 
and Affordable Housing Grants

AGENCY: Office of the Chief of the Human Capital Officer, HUD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: HUD announces the availability on its website of the applicant 
information, submission deadlines, funding criteria, and other 
requirements for HUD's Fiscal Year (FY) 2010 Capacity Building for 
Community Development and Affordable Housing Grants NOFA. This NOFA 
announces the availability of $49.5 million in Fiscal Year (FY) 2010 
funding to carry out the eligible activities related to affordable 
housing and community development for the Section 4 capacity building 
program, of which at least $5 million shall be made available for rural 
capacity building activities. This competition is limited to the 
organizations identified in the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010 
(Pub. L. 111-117). The eligible organizations are: Enterprise Community 
Partners, Inc. (formerly The Enterprise Foundation), the Local 
Initiatives Support Corporation (LISC), and Habitat for Humanity 
International.
    The notice providing information regarding the application process, 
funding criteria and eligibility requirements can be found using the 
Department of Housing and Urban Development agency link on the 
Grants.gov/Find Web site at http://www.grants.gov/search/agency.do. A 
link to Grants.gov is also available on the HUD Web site at http://www.hud.gov/offices/adm/grants/fundsavail.cfm. The Catalogue of Federal 
Domestic Assistance (CFDA) number for this program is 14.252. 
Applications must be submitted electronically through Grants.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Questions regarding specific program 
requirements should be directed to the agency contact identified in the 
program NOFA. Program staff will not be available to provide guidance 
on how to prepare the application. Questions regarding the 2010 General 
Section should be directed to the Office of Grants Management and 
Oversight at (202) 708-0667 or the NOFA Information Center at 800-HUD-
8929 (toll free). Persons with hearing or speech impairments may access 
these numbers via TTY by calling the Federal Information Relay Service 
at 800-877-8339.

    Dated: November 23, 2010.
Barbara S. Dorf,
Director, Office of Departmental Grants Management and Oversight, 
Office of the Chief of the Human Capital Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010-31116 Filed 12-9-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210-67-P
120 STAT. 2762 PUBLIC LAW 109–410—DEC. 18, 2006

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S. 1219 (H.R. 2978):

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 109–419 accompanying H.R. 2978 (Comm. on Resources).

SENATE REPORTS: No. 109–213 (Comm. on Indian Affairs).

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 152 (2006):

Feb. 1, considered and passed Senate.

Dec. 5, considered and passed House.

Æ

Public Law 109–410

109th Congress

An Act

To authorize certain tribes in the State of Montana to enter into a lease or other

temporary conveyance of water rights to meet the water needs of the Dry Prairie

Rural Water Association, Inc.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TEMPORARY CONVEYANCE OF WATER RIGHTS TO DRY

PRAIRIE RURAL WATER ASSOCIATION, INC.

(a) IN GENERAL.—The Assiniboine and Sioux Tribes of the

Fort Peck Indian Reservation, Montana (referred to in this section

as the ‘‘Tribes’’) may, with the approval of the Secretary, enter

into a lease or other temporary conveyance of water rights recognized under the Fort Peck-Montana Compact (Montana Code Annotated 85–20–201) with the Dry Prairie Rural Water Association,

Incorporated (or any successor non-Federal entity) for the purpose

of meeting the water needs of that association, in accordance with

section 5 of the Fort Peck Reservation Rural Water System Act

of 2000 (Public Law 106–382; 114 Stat. 1454).

(b) CONDITIONS OF LEASE.—With respect to a lease or other

temporary conveyance described in subsection (a)—

(1) the term of the lease or conveyance shall not exceed

100 years; and

(2)(A) the lease or conveyance may be approved by the

Secretary without monetary compensation to the Tribes; and

(B) the Secretary shall not be subject to liability for any

claim relating to any compensation or consideration received

by the Tribes under the lease or conveyance.

(C) NO PERMANENT ALIENATION OF WATER.—Nothing in this

section authorizes a permanent alienation of any water by the

Tribes.

Approved December 18, 2006.

Dec. 18, 2006

[S. 1219]
###### Editorial Note on Part 35

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 35 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

#### § 35.1 Purpose and scope.

This part contains the requirements and provisions for the medical use of byproduct material and for issuance of specific licenses authorizing the medical use of this material. These requirements and provisions provide for the radiation safety of workers, the general public, patients, and human research subjects. The requirements and provisions of this part are in addition to, and not in substitution for, others in this chapter. The requirements and provisions of parts 19, 20, 21, 30, 37, 71, 170, and 171 of this chapter apply to applicants and licensees subject to this part unless specifically exempted.

[78 FR 17006, Mar. 19, 2013]
§ 600.252 Collection of amounts due. ( a ) Any funds paid to a grantee in excess of the amount to which the grantee is finally determined to be entitled under the terms of the award constitute a debt to the Federal Government. If not paid within a reasonable period after demand, the Federal agency may reduce the debt by: ( 1 ) Making an adminstrative offset against other requests for reimbursements,
( 2 ) Withholding advance payments otherwise due to the grantee, or
( 3 ) Other action permitted by law.
( b ) Except where otherwise provided by statutes or regulations, the Federal agency will charge interest on an overdue debt in accordance with the Federal Claims Collection Standards (4 CFR Ch. II). The date from which interest is computed is not extended by litigation or the filing of any form of appeal.
Entitlements [Reserved]