alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### State of Missouri, to the use of Andrew Stahl, Appellant, *v.*Anton J. Michel et al., Respondents.

May 20, 1879.

Where property is seized on execution while in possession of the judgment debtor, and another claims the property by virtue of a livery-stable keeper’s lien, the officer properly sells it subject to the claim; he is not bound to demand a bond, and, in default thereof, deliver the property to the claimant.

Appeal from St. Louis Circuit Court.

*Affirmed.*

T. J. Rowe, fob appellant, cited :

Sess. Acts 1877, p. 251, sect. 1; Wag. Stats. 906, sects. 1, 2; *Beall*v. *White,*94 U. S. 382 ; *The State, etc.*v. *Platt,*52 Mo. 469 ; *The State, etc.*v. *McKellop,*40 Mo. 184; *The State, etc.*v. *Koch,*47 Mo. 582.

H. N. Hart, for respondents.

Bakewell, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

This is an action against a constable and. the sureties on *240Ms official bond. It appears that Michel, a constable of the city of St. Louis, seized a horse, harness, and buggy in the possession of Lynds & Bro., against whom he had an execution. The constable duly advertised; and on the day of sale, Stahl, to whose use this action is brought, served upon the constable a written notice, verified by affidavit, that he claimed the property, and that the interest claimed by him was a stable-keeper’s lien for $80.33, the items of which were set out. The bill is made out against the defendants in the execution. The constable read the claim to the bidders at the sale, and notified them that the property would be sold subject to the claim. It is contended that the constable should have demanded a bond from the plaintiff in the execution; and if no sufficient bond was given, should have abandoned the levy to the claimant. The court, sitting as a jury, found for the defendant.

The law provides (Sess. Acts 1877, p. 251, sect. 1) that where personal property shall be seized on execution, and any person other than the execution debtor shall claim the same in the manner prescribed in the act, and set forth in his claim “ the right, title, or interest of said claimant in and to said property,” etc., the constable shall demand a bond, and, on failure to give it, may release the property to the claimant.

The horse, buggy, and harness seized in this case were not in the possession of the claimant when seized by the constable; they had been removed from the stable for several days. The statute, it is true, provides (Stats. 1875, p. 88) that if the property be taken from the possession of the stable-keeper, the lien shall still be effectual. But the mere having a lien is an abstract right, which amounts to nothing unless enforced. The claimant, at the time of his claim, had no such right, title, or interest in the property as warranted a delivery of the property to him. *241
      *Burns*v. *Lidwell,*6 Mo. App. 192. The constable acted with a strict regard to the rights of all parties in selling subject to the claim of the plaintiff to a lien.

The judgment is affirmed.

All the judges concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 303 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 303

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                          June 8, 2005.
    Resolved,  That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the 
Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XVIII, declare the House resolved 
into the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for 
consideration of the bill (H.R. 2744) making appropriations for Agriculture, 
Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration, and Related Agencies for the 
fiscal year ending September 30, 2006, and for other purposes. The first reading 
of the bill shall be dispensed with. All points of order against consideration 
of the bill are waived. General debate shall be confined to the bill and shall 
not exceed one hour equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking 
minority member of the Committee on Appropriations. After general debate the 
bill shall be considered for amendment under the five-minute rule. Points of 
order against provisions in the bill for failure to comply with clause 2 of rule 
XXI are waived except as follows: beginning with the colon on page 54, line 4, 
through ``overseas'' on line 9; section 749; page 81, lines 1 though 7; and 
beginning with ``and'' on page 81, line 11, through ``programs'' on line 17. 
Where points of order are waived against part of a paragraph or section, points 
of order against a provision in another part of such paragraph or section may be 
made only against such provision and not against the entire paragraph or 
section. During consideration of the bill for amendment, the Chairman of the 
Committee of the Whole may accord priority in recognition on the basis of 
whether the Member offering an amendment has caused it to be printed in the 
portion of the Congressional Record designated for that purpose in clause 8 of 
rule XVIII. Amendments so printed shall be considered as read. When the 
committee rises and reports the bill back to the House with a recommendation 
that the bill do pass, the previous question shall be considered as ordered on 
the bill and amendments thereto to final passage without intervening motion 
except one motion to recommit with or without instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of Greene County Bancshares,
      Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 (the
“Report”), I, R. Stan Puckett, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
      of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:






|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 
| | 

|(2) | The
              information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
              respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
              Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------







/s/
      R.
      Stan Puckett


R.
      Stan
      Puckett


Chairman
      of the Board and
      Chief Executive


Officer





Date:
      May
      9, 2007
#### Clarence M. George, III, Respondent, v. Jacqueline E. George, Appellant.

'Judgment unanimously affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: The proof before the trial court amply supports granting plaintiff a decree of divorce. The ground for the decree was properly determined to be defendant’s cruel and inhuman treatment of the plaintiff. Although the trial court made no finding on the issue of abandonment, it was raised by the pleadings and was proved by the unexplained, willful and continued withdrawal from cohabitation by defendant despite the repeated requests for its resumption by plaintiff. Abandonment is, therefore, an additional reason for granting the decree *(Diemer*v. *Diemer,*8 N Y 2d 206; *Mirizio*v. *Mirizio,*242 N. Y. 74; *Matter of La Penna,*16 A D 2d 655). The court erred, however, in finding that defendant committed adultery. There was substantial uncontradicted evidence that a male friend visited defendant wife on various occasions while plaintiff was absent from the home. This was the only testimony submitted to prove adultery. The evidence of these visits was sufficient to prove opportunity. However, adultery must be based upon clear and convincing proof of inclination and intent, as well as opportunity *(Bosch*v. *Bosch,*275 App. Div. 1046; *Braun*v. *Braun,*245 App. Div. 194). While the visits may be considered as further proof of cruel and inhuman treatment, standing alone as they do, they are insufficient to support a finding of adulterous conduct. Defendant’s contention that the trial court’s decision is insufficient in that it fails to set forth the facts upon which the court based its decision is without merit. CPLR 4213 (subd. [b]) provides that a court’s decision may be oral or in writing “and shall state the facts it deems essential ”. The parties waived the filing of requested findings of fact, but such a stipulation does not dispense with the requirement that the decision must contain the essential facts upon which the judgment is found. (See *Conklin*v. *State,*22 A D 2d 481; *Sager*v. *Sager,*21 A D 2d 183.) The statute requires only that the ultimate or essential facts *889on which the decision is based be set forth. (See *Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.*v. *Union Trust Co.,*268 App. Div. 474, 479, affd. 294 N. Y. 254; *Ryan & Son*v. *Lancaster Homes,*22 A D 2d 186, 192.) There was no need for the court to state the evidentiary facts contained in the record. (Appeal from judgment of Erie Trial Term, in divorce action.) Present — Goldman, P. J., Witmer, Gabrielli, Bastow and Henry, JJ.
H. Res. 59

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

February 2, 2005.

Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it

shall be in order to consider in the House the concurrent resolution (H. Con. Res. 36) expressing the continued support

of Congress for equal access of military recruiters to institutions of higher education. The concurrent resolution shall be

considered as read. The previous question shall be considered

as ordered on the concurrent resolution and preamble to final

adoption without intervening motion or demand for division

of the question except: (1) one hour of debate on the concurrent resolution equally divided and controlled by the chairman

and ranking minority member of the Committee on Armed

Services; and (2) one motion to recommit.

Attest:

Clerk.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sionix Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Robert McCray, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Robert McCray
------------------------------------------
    Robert McCray, Chief Financial Officer

February 23, 2004
§ 600.362 Subsequent adjustments and continuing responsibilities. ( a ) The closeout of an award does not affect any of the following: ( 1 ) The right of DOE to disallow costs and recover funds on the basis of a later audit or other review.
( 2 ) The obligation of the recipient to return any funds due as a result of later refunds, corrections, or other transactions.
( 3 ) Audit requirements in § 600.316.
( 4 ) Property management requirements in §§ 600.321 through 600.325.
( 5 ) Records retention requirements in § 600.342.
( b ) After closeout of an award, the continuing responsibilities under an award may be modified or ended in whole or in part with the consent of the contracting officer and the recipient, provided property management requirements are considered and provisions made for the continuing responsibilities of the recipient, as appropriate.
Order issued October , 2012 

In The 

Truth of Apptats 

JiiftI1Distrirt of &rxas at Dallas 

No. 05-11-00731-CV 

CONSTANCE GIBSON, INDIVIDUALLY AND 

AS NEXT FRIEND OF M.G., A MINOR, Appellant 

V. 

GARLAND INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT, Appellee 

ORDER 

The Motion for Rehearing filed by appellant is hereby DENIED. 

AiViLae/41 

ABETH LANG-4 

ICE
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 891 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 891

    To amend title 49, United States Code, with respect to employee 
            protective arrangements, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 6, 2017

 Mr. Meadows (for himself and Mr. Farenthold) introduced the following 
    bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and 
                             Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend title 49, United States Code, with respect to employee 
            protective arrangements, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Federal Transit Modernization Act of 
2017''.

SEC. 2. EMPLOYEE PROTECTIVE ARRANGEMENTS.

    (a) In General.--Section 5333 of title 49, United States Code, is 
amended--
            (1) by striking ``(a) Prevailing Wages Requirement.--''; 
        and
            (2) by striking subsection (b).
    (b) Conforming Amendments.--
            (1) Formula grants for rural areas.--Section 5311(i) of 
        title 49, United States Code, is repealed.
            (2) Administrative provisions.--Section 5334(a)(1) of title 
        49, United States Code, is amended by striking ``(except terms 
        the Secretary of Labor prescribes under section 5333(b) of this 
        title)''.
                                 <all>
```
(logo) Prudential 

                                                                                                                                        Prudential Asset Resources

 

Prudential Mortgage Capital Company

2100 Ross Avenue, Suite 2500, Dallas TX 75201

Tel 214 777-4500

 

A business of Prudential Financial, Inc.

 

 

                                              

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Wells Fargo Bank, National Association

Attn: Commercial Mtg Servicing

MAC D1086-120

550 South Tryon Street, 14th Floor

Charlotte, NC 28202

 

 

 

RE:        RBS Commercial Funding Inc., Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2013-C11

    Period:   **January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2014 (the "Reporting Period")**

Annual Compliance Statement

I, Hal Collett, in my capacity as President and Managing Director  of Prudential Asset Resources, Inc. (the "Company") hereby certify with regard to the Company's role as Primary Servicer under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, (the "Agreement")  dated as of February 1, 2013 pertaining to the above-referenced certificates, that:

 

(i)            a review of the activities of the Company under the Agreement during the Reporting Period, and of the performance of the Company under the Agreement has been made under my supervision, and

 

 

(ii)           to the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Company has fulfilled  all its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

 

 

 

                Effective as of March 19, 2015

 

 

/s/ Hal Collett

Hal Collett

President and Managing Director

Prudential Asset Resources, Inc.
#### § 603.1310 Program official.

A Federal Government program manager, project officer, scientific officer, or other individual who is responsible for managing the technical program being carried out through the use of a TIA.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

HUBERT JACKSON,

Petitioner

v.

THE COMMONWEALTH COURT,

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 95 WM 2017

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 5th day of January, 2018

, the Application for Leave to File

Original Process is GRANTED, and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus is DENIED.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

FARMERS 

TELECOMMUNICATIONS 

COOPERATIVE, INC.,

Plaintiff,

v.

VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS, 

INC., VERIZON BUSINESS, QWEST 

COMMUNICATIONS 

INTERNATIONAL, INC., and 

Fictitious Defendants A,B, C, and D,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CIVIL ACTION NO.

CV-06-790-VPM

MOTION FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE

Pursuant to provisions of LR 83.1(b) of the Local Rules of the United States 

District Court for the Middle District of Alabama, Leigh Anne Hodge, a member 

of the bar of this Court and one of the attorneys of record for defendant, Qwest 

Communications Corporation, moves this Court to admit Jana Eisinger pro hac 

vice as additional counsel for defendant. Ms. Eisinger is a member in good 

standing of the State Courts of Colorado and the United States District Court for 

the District of Colorado. Attached hereto is a certificate of admission to the 

Supreme Court of the State of Colorado, and certificates of good standing in the 

Case 2:06-cv-00790-WC Document 13 Filed 01/11/2007 Page 1 of 4
2

United States District Court for the District of Colorado, indicating that Jana 

Eisinger is a member in good standing of the bar of those courts.

The prescribed admission fee has been tendered to the Clerk 

contemporaneously with the filing of this motion.

s/Leigh Anne Hodge

Leigh Anne Hodge

Attorney for Defendant, Qwest 

Communications Corporation

BALCH & BINGHAM LLP

Post Office Box 306 

Birmingham, AL 35201-0306

Telephone: (205) 251-8100

Facsimile: (205) 488-5698

E-mail: lhodge@balch.com

Case 2:06-cv-00790-WC Document 13 Filed 01/11/2007 Page 2 of 4
3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of the 

Court using the CM/ECF system and service will be perfected upon the following 

this the 11th day of January, 2007:

Dana H. Billingsley

Jonathan Michael Hooks

Mark Douglas Wilkerson

Wilkerson & Bryan, P.C.

405 South Hull Street

P. O. Box 830

Montgomery, AL 36104

Patrick H. Tate

P. O. Box 680593

Fort Payne, AL 35968

Bryan Oxford Balogh

Starnes & Atchison

P. O. Box 598512

Birmingham, AL 35259-8512

s/Leigh Anne Hodge

Attorney for Defendant, Qwest 

Communications Corporation

BALCH & BINGHAM LLP

Post Office Box 306 

Birmingham, AL 35201-0306

Telephone: (205) 251-8100

Facsimile: (205) 488-5698

E-mail: lhodge@balch.com

Case 2:06-cv-00790-WC Document 13 Filed 01/11/2007 Page 3 of 4
Case 2:06-cv-00790-WC Document 13 Filed 01/11/2007 Page 4 of 4
Case 2:06-cv-00790-WC Document 13-2 Filed 01/11/2007 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:06-cv-00790-WC Document 13-2 Filed 01/11/2007 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:06-cv-00790-WC Document 13-2 Filed 01/11/2007 Page 3 of 3
§ 7.14 Public information on advisory committees. ( a ) The Nuclear Regulatory Commission shall maintain systematic information on the nature, functions, and operations of each NRC advisory committee. A complete set of the charters of NRC advisory committees and copies of the annual reports required by § 7.17(a) will be maintained for public inspection at either the NRC Web site, *http://www.nrc.gov ,* at the NRC Public Document Room, or both.
( b ) Subject to the provisions of the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552) and NRC's Freedom of Information Act regulations at 10 CFR part 9, subpart A, copies of NRC advisory committees' records, reports, transcripts, minutes, appendices, working papers, drafts, studies, agenda, and other documents shall be maintained for public inspection and copying at the NRC Web site, *http://www.nrc.gov ,* at the NRC Public Document Room, or both. To provide the public a meaningful opportunity to comprehend fully the work undertaken by an NRC advisory committee, advisory committee records should be available to the public as soon as practicable. Members of the public or other interested parties may review non-exempt advisory committee records without filing a request for these records under the Freedom of Information Act.
( c ) Official records generated by or for an advisory committee must be retained for the duration of the advisory committee. Upon termination of the advisory committee, the records must be processed in accordance with the Federal Records Act (44 U.S.C. Chapters 21, 29-33) and regulations issued by the National Archives and Records Administration (*see* 36 CFR Parts 1220, 1222, 1228, and 1234), or in accordance with the Presidential Records Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 22).
[67 FR 79842, Dec. 31, 2002]
PGI 217.7103-1 Content and format of master agreements.       (1) A master agreement shall contain all clauses required by DFARS 217.7104(a), statute, and Executive order.          (2) The following format may be adapted to fit specific circumstances:          MASTER AGREEMENT FOR REPAIR AND ALTERATION OF VESSELS          1. This agreement is entered into this ____ day of _____________________,____, by the United States of America (the “Government”:) represented by _________________, the Contracting Officer, and ___________________________, a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of __________________________ (the “Contractor”).          2. The clauses in this agreement, shall be incorporated, by reference or attachment, in job orders issued under this agreement to effect repairs, alterations, and/or additions to vessels.          3. By giving 30 days written notice, either party to this agreement has the right to cancel it without affecting the rights and liabilities under any job order existing at the time of cancellation. The Contractor shall perform, under the terms of this agreement, all work covered by any job order awarded before the effective date of the cancellation.          4. This agreement may be modified only by mutual agreement of the parties. A modification of this agreement shall not affect any job order in existence at the time of modification, unless the parties agree otherwise.          5. The rights and obligations of the parties to this agreement are set forth in this agreement and the clauses of any job orders issued under this agreement. In the event there is an inconsistency between this agreement and any job order, the provisions of this agreement shall govern.          6. This agreement shall remain in effect until cancelled by either party.          THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICAby                      (Contracting Officer)(Contractor)by                      (Authorized Individual)(Title)    **Parent topic:** PGI 217.7103 Master agreements and job orders.