alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NO. 07-07 -029 3-CV IN THE CO UR T OF APPEA LS FO R THE S EVEN TH D ISTRI CT O F TEXAS

AT AM AR ILLO PAN EL A OC TOBER23, 2007

_________

_________

_________

___ JEFFREY D AVID BAXTER, APP ELL ANT

V. SH AN NO N KATHLE EN BAXTER, APPEL LEE

_________

_________

_________

______ FRO M T HE COU NT Y COUR T AT LA W NUMB ER ONE OF W IL L IA MS ON COU NT Y;

NO . 05- 2558- FC 1; H ON ORABLE SU ZAN NE BR OOKS , J UD GE

_________

_________

_________

____ Before CAMPBE LL a nd HANCOCK an d PIRT LE, JJ. ME MO RA ND UM OPI NI ON Pen ding before this Court is Je f f reyDa v id Baxter’s Amen ded Motion to Dismiss this appeal . The cer

ti ficat e of c onferenc e re flect s that Shannon Kathl een Baxter is not oppos ed to the moti on bei ng granted. W it hout pass ing on t he mer it s o f the appea l, Je ff re y Dav id Baxter ’s moti on i s g ra nted and t he appe al is hereby dismi ss ed. Tex . R . Ap p. P .2

42.1( a) (1 ). H av ing di smi ss ed th e appeal at Mr . Ba xter ’s req uest , no moti on for re hear ing w il l be ent ertai ned, and our mandate w il l is sue forthw it h.

Pat rick A. Pirtle Justice
§ 5.220 Admissions. ( a ) Admissions to educational institutions prior to June 24, 1973, are not covered by these Title IX regulations.
( b ) *Administratively separate units.* For the purposes only of this section, §§ 5.225 and 5.230, and §§ 5.300 through 5.310, each administratively separate unit shall be deemed to be an educational institution.
( c ) *Application of §§ 5.300 through 5.310 .* Except as provided in paragraphs (d) and (e) of this section, §§ 5.300 through 5.310 apply to each recipient. A recipient to which §§ 5.300 through 5.310 apply shall not discriminate on the basis of sex in admission or recruitment in violation of §§ 5.300 through 5.310.
( d ) *Educational institutions.* Except as provided in paragraph (e) of this section as to recipients that are educational institutions, §§ 5.300 through 5.310 apply only to institutions of vocational education, professional education, graduate higher education, and public institutions of undergraduate higher education.
( e ) *Public institutions of undergraduate higher education.* §§ 5.300 through 5.310 do not apply to any public institution of undergraduate higher education that traditionally and continually from its establishment has had a policy of admitting students of only one sex.
Exhibit 31.4 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 302 OF 

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

I, Jonathan Freve, certify that: 

 

| 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the annual report on Form 10-K/A of Spring Bank Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; and |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

Date: April 30, 2019 

 

|                                                                                |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| /s/ Jonathan Freve                                                                  |
| Jonathan Freve                                                                      |
| Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

(principal accounting and financial officer) |
Financial Counseling Program



 Exhibit 10.28 
 ALTRIA GROUP, INC. 
 Financial Counseling Program 
 Altria Group, Inc. has a program that has existed since January 1, 1980 to provide for financial counseling services for key executives. This program
currently provides for reimbursement to senior management or payment directly to the chosen advisor for expenditures they incur in connection with their personal financial and estate planning and preparation of tax returns for them and/or their
dependent children, subject to the following annual limits: 
  

	1.	$15,000 for the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer; 

  

	2.	$10,000 for salary bands B and C; and 

  

	3.	Lesser amounts for certain subordinate salary bands. 

 Rather than limit individuals to specific advisors, each eligible executive may seek his own reputable advisor to perform such services. Reimbursement shall be limited to the services set forth above and will not include, for example, fees
related to the execution of financial transactions (e.g., a broker’s fee for the purchase and/or sale of a mutual fund or individual stock). Also, it shall be necessary for invoices to reflect in reasonable detail the nature and extent of the
services performed. 
 Payments by Altria Group, Inc. under this program will be included in the executive’s taxable compensation in the
year in which reimbursement occurred.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. David McRae, Appellant.

Judgment rendered April 19, 1968, unanimously reversed on the law and the case is remitted to the court below for further proceedings and for resentencing. The defendant, after his guilty plea, was arraigned on a prior information. He admitted the identity, but stated that he thought lie *773had entered a plea to a misdemeanor and not a plea of guilty to a felony. We accept this as a challenge to the prior conviction on the ground it had been unconstitutionally obtained. The .sentencing court, however, adjudged the defendant a second felony offender and imposed a second felony sentence, without a hearing. In our opinion, this procedure was contra to section 1943 of the former Penal Law (which was the controlling statute when the crimes were committed), according to which the sentencing court is mandated to hear and determine the constitutionality of the prior conviction, if it is challenged, before it imposes sentence on the current conviction. (See *People*v. *Webster,*32 A D 2d 557; *People*v. *Jones,*17 N Y 2d 404, 408-409; *People*v. *Cornish,*21 A D 2d 280 [1st Dept.].) If the prior conviction is found defective, it may not form the predicate of a multiple offender sentence, and in this case, the defendant could then be resentenced as a first felony offender. Concur — Stevens, P. J., Eager, McGivern, Markewich and Nunez, JJ.
Security Awareness For Taxpayers

TAXES. SECURITY. TOGETHER.

The IRS, the states and the tax industry are committed to protecting you from identity theft. Working together, we’ve 

made many changes to combat identity theft. We are making progress. The IRS is working hand-in-hand with your state 

revenue officials, your tax software provider and your tax professional. But, we need your help. We need you to join with 

us. By taking a few simple steps to protect all of your digital devices, you can better protect your personal and financial 

data online and at home.

Please consider these steps to protect yourself from identity thieves:

Keep Your Computer and Mobile Phone Secure

• Use firewall and security software, set it for automatic updates;

• Treat your personal information like cash, don’t leave it lying around;

• Use strong, unique passwords; consider a password manager;

• Use Multi-Factor Authentication;

• Give personal information only over encrypted websites - look for “https”addresses;

• Back up your files.

Avoid Phishing Scams and Malware

Identity thieves use phishing emails to trick users into giving up passwords and other information. Don’t take the bait. Look for:

• Emails that pose as trusted source, i.e. bank, taxprovider;

• Emails with an urgent message, i.e. update your account now!, with instructions to open a link or attachment;

• Never download software or apps from pop-up advertising;

• Talk to family about online security, both with computers and mobile devices.

Protect Your Tax Return

Taxpayers who can validate their identities can obtain an Identity Protection PIN. An IP PIN is a six-digit code that 

prevents an identity thief from filing a fraudulent tax return using your Social Security number. Learn more at 

www.irs.gov/ippin. If you are an identity theft victim and your tax account is affected, review www.irs.gov/identitytheft.

Avoid IRS Impersonators. The IRS will not call you with threats of jail or lawsuits. The IRS will not send you an 

unsolicited email suggesting you have a refund or that you need to update your account. The IRS will not request any 

sensitive information online. These are all scams, and they are persistent. Don’t fall for them. Forward IRS-related scam 

emails to phishing@irs.gov. Report IRS- impersonation telephone calls at www.tigta.gov.

Publication 4524 (Rev. 1-2021) Catalog Number 48359Q Department of the Treasury Internal Revenue Service www.irs.gov
IV 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 488 

Requesting that the President transmit to the House of Representatives 

information in his possession relating to contracts for services or construction related to Hurricane Katrina recovery. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 7, 2005 

Mr. LATOURETTE (for himself, Mr. LOBIONDO, and Mr. MCCOTTER) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 

Transportation and Infrastructure 

RESOLUTION 

Requesting that the President transmit to the House of 

Representatives information in his possession relating to 

contracts for services or construction related to Hurricane Katrina recovery. 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives requests 

2 that the President transmit to the House of Representa3 tives, not later than 14 days after the date of the adoption 

4 of this resolution, copies of any portions of any contracts 

5 in his possession for services or building or other construc6 tion (including pre-awarded contracts or contracts that 

7 were modified or extended) related to Hurricane Katrina 

8 recovery or rebuilding in the geographic areas specified in 
2 

•HRES 488 IH 

1 the President’s Proclamation 7924 of September 8, 2005, 

2 that were awarded by the Federal Emergency Manage3 ment Agency (or any other agency) pursuant to the Robert 

4 T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act 

5 (42 U.S.C. 5121 et seq.), and any communications in his 

6 possession made or received, on or after August 26, 2005, 

7 by such agency relating to such contracts. 

Æ
PGI 234.7100 Policy.

The OSD Deputy Director, Cost Assessment, may be contacted at—

Defense Cost and Resource Center

201 12th Street, Suite 220

Arlington, VA 22202-5408

703–601–4850

703–604–1012 (fax)

DSN: 329–4850 osd.pentagon.cape.mbx.dcarc@mail.mil http://dcarc.pae.osd.mil

Parent topic: PGI 234.71 -COST AND SOFTWARE DATA REPORTING
COURTROOM DEPUTY MINUTES DATE : SEPTEMBER 25, 2006

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA DIGITAL RECORDED: 1:12 p. m. to 1:15 p.m.

PRETRIAL CONFERENCE 

PRESIDING MAG. JUDGE: CHARLES S. COODY DEPUTY CLERK: WANDA STINSON 

CASE NUMBER: 2:06CR200-WHA-CSC DEFENDANT NAME: HECTOR SILVA 

 

APPEARANCES

GOVERNMENT DEFENDANT

ATTY. TERRY MOORER ATTY. DONNIE BETHEL

/ DISCOVERY STATUS: Complete.

_________________________________________________________________________________________

 _________________________________________________________________________________________

/ PENDING MOTION STATUS: None.

/ PLEA STATUS:

__________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________

/ TRIAL STATUS: Will take 2 days to try cases, if goes to trial.

_________________________________________________________________________________________

 REMARKS:

__________________________________________________________________________________________________

Case 2:06-cr-00200-WHA-CSC Document 50 Filed 09/25/2006 Page 1 of 1
§ 611.102 Eligible project costs. ( a ) Eligible costs are: ( 1 ) Those costs that are reasonably related to the reequipping, expanding, or establishing a manufacturing facility in the United States to produce qualifying advanced technology vehicles or qualifying components;
( 2 ) Costs of engineering integration performed in the United States for qualifying vehicles or qualifying components;
( 3 ) Costs for payment with loan proceeds that are incurred, but not yet paid by the borrower, after a substantially complete application has been submitted to DOE; and
( 4 ) Costs incurred after closing of the loan.
( b ) In determining the overall total cost of an Eligible Project, DOE and the applicant may include significant costs already incurred and capitalized by the applicant in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles and these costs may be considered by DOE in determining the Borrower's contribution to total project costs.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 505 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 505

    Requesting the President of the United States and directing the 
 Secretary of State to provide to the House of Representatives certain 
 documents in their possession relating to the White House Iraq Group.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 20, 2005

Mr. Kucinich submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                the Committee on International Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
    Requesting the President of the United States and directing the 
 Secretary of State to provide to the House of Representatives certain 
 documents in their possession relating to the White House Iraq Group.

    Resolved, That the President of the United States is requested and 
the Secretary of State is directed to provide to the House of 
Representatives, not later than 14 days after the date of adoption of 
this resolution--
            (1) all documents from 2003 pertaining to the taskforce 
        organized by Andrew Card, consisting of Karl Rove, Karen 
        Hughes, Mary Matalin, Nicholas E. Calio, James R. Wilkinson, 
        Condoleezza Rice, Stephen Hadley and I. Lewis Libby, known as 
        the White House Iraq Group;
            (2) all drafts of all white papers on the topic of Iraq's 
        nuclear threat assembled in 2003 by the White House Iraq Group; 
        and
            (3) all documents, including notes from meetings, memos, 
        telephone and electronic mail records, logs and calendars, and 
        records of internal discussions in the possession of the 
        President or the Secretary of State relating to the White House 
        Iraq Group.
                                 <all>
```
**VI A**  **ELECTRONIC SUBMISSION**

The Rules Docket (AGC 200) Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S W Wa shington, DC. 20591

Re: Request to withdraw a p etition to renew Exemption Number 10492 by t he Lone Star Flight Museum.

To Wh om It May Concern: The Lone Star Flight Museum wishes to withdraw a prior petition dated November 25, 2014 to renew Exemption Number 10492. W e will apply for a new LHFE exemption under the new guidance published in July of this year. Thank you for yo ur assistance in this matter,

Very Truly yours,

Larry J. Gregory President Lone Star Flight Museum
Editorial Note on Part 61
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 61 appear at 80 FR 74980, Dec. 1, 2015, and at 81 FR 86909, Dec. 2, 2016.

§ 61.72 Filing of proposals for State and Tribal participation. ( a ) A State or tribal governing body whose interest is affected by a near-surface disposal facility at the proposed site may submit to the Director a proposal for participation in the review of a license application. Proposals must be submitted within the following time periods: ( 1 ) For the State in which the disposal facility will be located, or any State that is member of an interstate compact that includes the State in which the disposal facility is located, no later than 45 days following publication in the Federal Register of the notice of tendering of an application submitted under § 61.20.
( 2 ) For any other State, or for a tribal governing body, no later than 120 days following publication in the Federal Register of the notice of tendering of an application submitted under § 61.20.
( b ) Proposals for participation in the licensing process must be made in writing and must be signed by the Governor of the State or the official otherwise provided for by State or tribal law.
( c ) At a minimum, proposals must contain each of the following items of information: ( 1 ) A general description of how the State or Tribe wishes to participate in the licensing process specifically identifying those issues it wishes to review.
( 2 ) A description of material and information which the State or Tribe plans to submit to the Commission for consideration in the licensing process. A tentative schedule referencing steps in the review and calendar dates for planned submittals should be included.
( 3 ) A description of any work that the State or Tribe proposes to perform for the Commission in support of the licensing process.
( 4 ) A description of State or Tribal plans to facilitate local government and citizen participation.
( 5 ) A preliminary estimate of the types and extent of impacts which the State expects, should a disposal facility be located as proposed.
( 6 ) If desired, any requests for educational or information services (seminars, public meetings) or other actions from the Commission such as establishment of additional Public Document Rooms or exchange of State personnel under the Intergovernmental Personnel Act.
Editorial Note on Part 35
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 35 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

§ 35.2080 Records of mobile medical services. ( a ) A licensee shall retain a copy of each letter that permits the use of byproduct material at a client's address, as required by § 35.80(a)(1). Each letter must clearly delineate the authority and responsibility of the licensee and the client and must be retained for 3 years after the last provision of service.
( b ) A licensee shall retain the record of each survey required by § 35.80(a)(4) for 3 years. The record must include the date of the survey, the results of the survey, the instrument used to make the survey, and the name of the individual who performed the survey.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. George Joseph Boundy, Appellant.

In this *coram nobis*proceeding defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated September 4, 1969, which denied his application to vacate a judgment of the former County Court, *830Queens County, rendered April 17, 1959, convicting him of attempted robbery in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty. A later order was made by the same court on October 9, 1969, granting defendant’s motion for reargument but adhering to the original decision. Appeal from order of September 4, 1969 dismissed as academic. That order was superseded by the order made on reargument. Order of October 9, 1969, affirmed insofar as it adhered to the original decision. This is the third *coram nobis*proceeding by defendant to set aside the judgment. In his first application, which was denied on October 8, 1959, defendant claimed he pled guilty because an Assistant District Attorney had promised that the sentence to be imposed would run concurrently with another felony sentence under which he was then imprisoned. No claim was then made that he was mentally incompetent when he pled guilty and was sentenced. In his second application, defendant claimed he was mentally incompetent when he pled guilty and when he was sentenced. He also claimed that while at the Kings County Hospital he had been taking seconal, a sedative which affected his competency to understand the plea. After a plenary hearing the application was denied *(People*v. *Boundy,*35 Misc 2d 1065). In this third application defendant again has claimed he was mentally incompetent when he pled guilty, and that the drug, seconal, which he had been taking as a sedative at that time, contributed to his inability to understand what he was doing; and that he was sentenced without a complete probation report. We agree with Criminal Term that the records in the prior proceedings clearly establish that there is no merit to this third application (cf. *People*v. *Sullivan,*4 N Y 2d 472; *People*v. *Martine,*278 App. Div. 966, affd. 303 N. Y. 789). Accordingly, there was no need for a hearing (cf. *People*v. *Tomaselli,*7 N Y 2d 350). On this appeal defendant contends that counsel should have been assigned to assist in the prosecution of his application. We also find no merit to this contention. He did not request counsel, although he knew such an application was available. Upon his request counsel had been assigned to represent him in prior proceedings and on this appeal. The record also establishes that defendant is knowledgeable in legal procedures. The repetitiveness of this proceeding with defendant’s prior proceedings further confirms that assignment of counsel was not called for at Criminal Term (cf. *People ex rel. Williams*v. *La Vallee,*19 N Y 2d 238, 240, 241). Christ, P. J., Latham, Kleinfeld, Brennan and Benjamin, JJ., concur.
Subpart 337.1 - Service Contracts - General

Parent topic: PART 337 - SERVICE CONTRACTING - GENERAL

337.103 Contracting officer responsibility.

(d)

(1) The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 352.237-70, Pro-Children Act, in solicitations,

contracts, and orders that involve:

(i) Kindergarten, elementary, or secondary education or library services; or

(ii) Health or daycare services that are provided to children under the age of 18 on a routine or

regular basis pursuant to the Pro-Children Act of 1994 (20 U.S.C. 6081-6084).

(2) The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 352.237-71, Crime Control Act - Reporting of

Child Abuse, in solicitations, contracts, and orders that require performance on Federal land or in a

federally operated (or contracted) facility and involve the professions/activities performed by

persons specified in the Crime Control Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 13031) including, but not limited to,

teachers, social workers, physicians, nurses, dentists, health care practitioners, optometrists,

psychologists, emergency medical technicians, alcohol or drug treatment personnel, child care

workers and administrators, emergency medical technicians and ambulance drivers.

(3) The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 352.237-72, Crime Control Act - Requirement for

Background Checks, in solicitations, contracts, and orders that involve providing child care services

to children under the age of 18, including social services, health and mental health care, child- (day)

care, education (whether or not directly involved in teaching), and rehabilitative programs covered

under the Crime Control Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 13041).

(4) Contracting officers supporting the Indian Health Service shall insert the clause at 352.237-73,

Indian Child Protection and Family Violence Act in all solicitations, contracts, and orders when

performance of the contract may involve regular contact with or control over Indian children. The

required declaration shall also be included in Section J of the solicitation and contract.

(e) The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 352.237-74, Non-Discrimination in Service

Delivery, in solicitations, contracts, and orders to deliver services under HHS' programs directly to

the public.

(f) The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 352.237-75, Key Personnel, in solicitations and

contracts when the contracting officer will require the contractor to designate contractor key

personnel.