alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 321

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the United States 

should support the regionally balanced expansion of the membership 

of the United Nations Security Council. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 15, 2005

Mr. LEACH submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on International Relations 

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that 

the United States should support the regionally balanced 

expansion of the membership of the United Nations Security Council.

Whereas since its inception in 1945, the United Nations Security Council has had five permanent members (presently the People’s Republic of China, France, Russia, the 

United Kingdom, and the United States); 

Whereas, in the sole enlargement of membership of the Security Council to date, the number of non-permanent Security Council members elected by the United Nations General Assembly for two-year terms was increased from six 

to ten in 1965; 
2

•HRES 321 IH 

Whereas affirmative Security Council decisions on substantive 

matters require nine votes, including the concurring votes 

of all five permanent Security Council members; 

Whereas since the formation of the Security Council, the 

threats and challenges to international peace and security 

have changed, as has the distribution of power among nations; 

Whereas the current Security Council does not include a permanent member from either Africa or Latin America; 

Whereas the implementation of Security Council decisions 

sometimes requires extensive military, financial, and political involvement by states not sitting on the Security 

Council, and some past Security Council decisions have 

lacked the resources and political determination necessary 

to credibly implement them; 

Whereas the Security Council should be expanded and reformed to increase its effectiveness, credibility, and capacity to act in the face of threats to international security; and 

Whereas, as advocated by the December 2004 report of the 

United Nations High-level Panel on Threats, Challenges 

and Change, expansion and reform of the Security Council should (1) increase the involvement in decisionmaking 

of countries that contribute most to the United Nations, 

financially, militarily, and diplomatically, (2) bring into 

the decisionmaking process countries more representative 

of the broader United Nations membership, especially of 

the developing world, (3) not impair the effectiveness of 

the Security Council, and (4) increase the democratic and 

accountable nature of the Security Council: Now, therefore, be it
3

•HRES 321 IH 

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that the United States should support the re3 gionally balanced expansion of the membership of the 

4 United Nations Security Council, which would include the 

5 addition of Japan, the Republic of India, the Federal Re6 public of Germany, the Federative Republic of Brazil, and 

7 an appropriate African country as permanent members 

8 without veto authority.

Æ
Editorial Note on Part 63
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 63 appear at 81 FR 86909, Dec. 2, 2016.

§ 63.11 Deliberate misconduct. ( a ) Any licensee, applicant for a license, employee of a licensee or applicant; or any contractor (including a supplier or consultant), subcontractor, employee of a contractor or subcontractor of any licensee or applicant for a license, who knowingly provides to any licensee, applicant, contractor, or subcontractor, any components, equipment, materials, or other goods or services that relate to a licensee's or applicant's activities in this part, may not: ( 1 ) Engage in deliberate misconduct that causes or would have caused, if not detected, a licensee or applicant to be in violation of any rule, regulation, or order; or any term, condition, or limitation of any license issued by the Commission; or
( 2 ) Deliberately submit to NRC, a licensee, an applicant, or a licensee's or applicant's contractor or subcontractor, information that the person submitting the information knows to be incomplete or inaccurate in some respect material to NRC.
( b ) A person who violates paragraph (a)(1) or (a)(2) of this section may be subject to enforcement action in accordance with the procedures in 10 CFR part 2, subpart B.
( c ) For purposes of paragraph (a)(1) of this section, deliberate misconduct by a person means an intentional act or omission that the person knows: ( 1 ) Would cause a licensee or applicant to be in violation of any rule, regulation, or order; or any term, condition, or limitation, of any license issued by the Commission; or
( 2 ) Constitutes a violation of a requirement, procedure, instruction, contract, purchase order, or policy of a licensee, applicant, contractor, or subcontractor.
#### In re MONTEGRIFFO.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

February 19, 1915.)

In the matter of Agostino H. *1131Montegriffo, Jr.

No opinion. Referred to Hon. J. J. Freedman, official referee. Settle order on notice. See, also, 163 App. Div. 885, 147 N. Y. Supp. *1127.*
#### William G. Denney, Petitioner-Appellant, v. State of Kansas, *Respondent-Appellee.*

No. 47,778

Opinion filed November 8, 1975.

*Hugh R. McCullough,*of Topeka, argued the cause, and *Jerry Shelor,*of Topeka, was on the brief for the appellant.

*George H. Herrelson, Jr., county attorney,*argued the cause, and *Curt T. Schneider,*attorney general, and *Kent Lynch,*legal intern with the county attorney’s office, were with him on the brief for the appellee.

Schroedeb, J.

Affirmed.

Miller, J., not participating.
#### In the Matter of the Estate of Caryl F. Walter, Deceased. Jay C. Walter, Appellant; Everett Scott Walter, Respondent, et al., Respondent.

[814 NYS2d 685]

In a proceeding pursuant to SCPA 2103, inter alia, to disclose and recover certain assets alleged to be a part of the decedent’s estate, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Surrogate’s Court, Queens County (Nahman, S.), dated April 20, 2005, which granted the motion of Everett Scott Walter to dismiss the proceeding insofar as asserted against him as time-barred.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is denied, and the petition is reinstated insofar as asserted against Everett Scott Walter.

*599The respondent Everett Scott Walter moved to dismiss the petition insofar as asserted against him as time-barred. The petitioner, Jay C. Walter, as executor of the will of Caryl E Walter, argued that the proceeding was timely pursuant to the tolling provisions of CPLR 205 (a) because it was commenced less than six months after the discontinuance without prejudice of a timely prior federal action arising from the same series of transactions and occurrences. The Surrogate’s Court granted the motion on the ground that CPLR 205 (a) did not apply. We reverse.

At the time of the discontinuance of the prior federal action, the parties sufficiently expressed their intent that the discontinuance was not on the merits, that it was without prejudice, and that consequently, the commencement of a new action within six months pursuant to CPLR 205 (a) was permitted *(see George v Mt. Sinai Hosp.,*47 NY2d 170 [1979]; *Bailey v Brookdale Univ. Hosp. & Med. Ctr.,*292 AD2d 328 [2002]; *Montgomery v Minarcin,*245 AD2d 920 [1997]; *see also United States Fid. & Guar. Co. v Smith Co.,*46 NY2d 498 [1979]). Thus, the Surrogate’s Court should not have granted the motion to dismiss the petition insofar as asserted against the respondent Everett Scott Walter as untimely due to the absence of the toll afforded by CPLR 205 (a).

In light of our determination, we do not reach the petitioner’s remaining contentions. Ritter, J.P., Mastro, Lunn and Covello, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 583 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 583

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                      December 7, 2005.
    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in order 
without intervention of any point of order to consider in the House the bill 
(H.R. 4340) to implement the United States-Bahrain Free Trade Agreement. The 
bill shall be considered as read. The bill shall be debatable for two hours 
equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of 
the Committee on Ways and Means. Pursuant to section 151 of the Trade Act of 
1974, the previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill to final 
passage without intervening motion.
    Sec. 2. During consideration of H.R. 4340 pursuant to this resolution, 
notwithstanding the operation of the previous question, the Chair may postpone 
further consideration of the bill to a time designated by the Speaker in 
consonance with section 151 of the Trade Act of 1974.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
§ 603.560 Estimate of project expenditures. ( a ) To use a fixed-support TIA, rather than an expenditure-based TIA, the contracting officer must have confidence in the estimate of the expenditures required to achieve well-defined outcomes. Therefore, the contracting officer must work carefully with program officials to select outcomes that, when the recipient achieves them, are reliable indicators of the amount of effort the recipient expended. However, the estimate of the required expenditures need not be a precise dollar amount, as illustrated by the example in paragraph (b) of this section, if: ( 1 ) The recipient is contributing a substantial share of the costs of achieving the outcomes, which must meet the criteria in § 603.305(a); and
( 2 ) The contracting officer is confident that the costs of achieving the outcomes will be at least a minimum amount that can be specified and the recipient is willing to accept the possibility that its cost sharing percentage ultimately will be higher if the costs exceed that minimum amount.
( b ) To illustrate the approach, consider a project for which the contracting officer is confident that the recipient will have to expend at least $800,000 to achieve the specified outcomes. The contracting officer must determine, in conjunction with program officials, the minimum level of recipient cost sharing required to demonstrate the recipient's commitment to the success of the project. For purposes of this illustration, let that minimum recipient cost sharing be 60% of the total project costs. In that case, the Federal share should be no more than 40% and the contracting officer could set a fixed level of Federal support at $320,000 (40% of $800,000). With that fixed level of Federal support, the recipient would be responsible for the balance of the costs needed to complete the project.
( c ) Note, however, that the level of recipient cost sharing negotiated should be based solely on the level needed to demonstrate the recipient's commitment. The contracting officer may not use a shortage of Federal Government funding for the program as a reason to try to persuade a recipient to accept a fixed-support TIA, rather than an expenditure-based instrument, or to accept responsibility for a greater share of the total project costs than it otherwise is willing to offer. If there is insufficient funding to provide an appropriate Federal Government share for the entire project, the contracting officer should re-scope the effort covered by the agreement to match the available funding.
IV 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 625 

Providing that the House of Representatives should consider policy options 

regarding United States policy in Iraq. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 16, 2005 

Mr. CAPUANO submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on International Relations 

RESOLUTION 

Providing that the House of Representatives should consider 

policy options regarding United States policy in Iraq. 

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that the House should consider policy options 

3 regarding United States policy in Iraq. 

Æ
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>6
<LEGEND> THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE FORM 10-Q AS OF JUNE 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
<MULTIPLIER>1
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                  JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       6-MOS
<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST>             527,568
<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE>          1,733,839
<RECEIVABLES>                           0
<ASSETS-OTHER>                      2,166
<OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS>                8,063
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  1,744,068
<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES>                0
<SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT>                 0
<OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES>         240,628
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES>               240,628
<SENIOR-EQUITY>                         0
<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON>          297,169
<SHARES-COMMON-STOCK>             106,990
<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR>             106,990
<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT>               0
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII>                  0
<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS>                 0
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS>                0
<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC>        1,206,271
<NET-ASSETS>                    1,503,440
<DIVIDEND-INCOME>                       0
<INTEREST-INCOME>                     674
<OTHER-INCOME>                          0
<EXPENSES-NET>                    258,269
<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME>          (257,595)
<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT>                0
<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT>               0
<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS>            (257,595)
<EQUALIZATION>                          0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME>               0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS>                0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER>                   0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD>                 0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED>             0
<SHARES-REINVESTED>                     0
<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS>           (257,595)
<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR>                 0
<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR>               0
<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR>                 0
<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR>              0
<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES>              17,028
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      0
<GROSS-EXPENSE>                   258,319
<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS>            1,632,237
<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN>                   6
<PER-SHARE-NII>                        (3)
<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC>                 0 <F1>
<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND>                    0
<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS>               0
<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL>                    0
<PER-SHARE-NAV-END>                     3
<EXPENSE-RATIO>                     15.82
[AVG-DEBT-OUTSTANDING]                  0
[AVG-DEBT-PER-SHARE]                    0
<FN>
A zero value is used since the change in net unrealized fair value is not
allocated to General Partners and Limited Partners as it is not taxable.
</FN>

</TABLE>
H. Res. 540

In the House of Representatives, U.S., 

November 9, 2005.

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule 

XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the 

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of 

the bill (H.R. 1751) to amend title 18, United States Code, 

to protect judges, prosecutors, witnesses, victims, and their 

family members, and for other purposes. The first reading of 

the bill shall be dispensed with. All points of order against 

consideration of the bill are waived. General debate shall be 

confined to the bill and shall not exceed one hour equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority 

member of the Committee on the Judiciary. After general debate the bill shall be considered for amendment under the 

five-minute rule. It shall be in order to consider as an original bill for the purpose of amendment under the five-minute 

rule the amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on the Judiciary now printed in 

the bill. The committee amendment in the nature of a sub-
2

•HRES 540 EH 

stitute shall be considered as read. All points of order against 

the committee amendment in the nature of a substitute are 

waived. Notwithstanding clause 11 of rule XVIII, no amendment to the committee amendment in the nature of a substitute shall be in order except those printed in the report of 

the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution. Each 

such amendment may be offered only in the order printed in 

the report, may be offered only by a Member designated in 

the report, shall be considered as read, shall be debatable for 

the time specified in the report equally divided and controlled 

by the proponent and an opponent, shall not be subject to 

amendment, and shall not be subject to a demand for division 

of the question in the House or in the Committee of the 

Whole. All points of order against such amendments are 

waived. At the conclusion of consideration of the bill for 

amendment the Committee shall rise and report the bill to 

the House with such amendments as may have been adopted. 

Any Member may demand a separate vote in the House on 

any amendment adopted in the Committee of the Whole to 

the bill or to the committee amendment in the nature of a 

substitute. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to final passage 
3

•HRES 540 EH 

without intervening motion except one motion to recommit 

with or without instructions.

Attest:

Clerk.
#### In the Matter of Thomas A. Grady, Respondent, v. Mayor of the City of Yonkers et al., Appellants.

In a proceeding pursuant to article 78 of the CPLR, *inter alia,*to invalidate a certain local law and to compel restoration of petitioner to his position as an employee of the City of Yonkers, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated June 20, 1968, which granted the petition. Judgment reversed, on the law, without costs, and proceeding remitted to the Special Term for consideration of the further contentions raised by petitioner which were not passed upon by the Special Term. The findings of fact below are affirmed. In our opinion, subdivision 1 of section 20 of the Municipal Home Rule Law, effective January 1, 1964, which provides in pertinent part that local laws must be passed by “at least the majority affirmative vote of the total voting power of the legislative body”, is applicable at bar. This provision superseded section 40 of the Second Class Cities Law, relied upon by the Special Term, which had empowered the local governing body (the common council) to act only upon a three-fourths vote of all its members. Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, Hopkins, Munder and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

 FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

EASTERN DIVISION

In the Matter of the Extradition of 

 
 )

MARIA del ROSARIO MORENO-VAZQUEZ ) 3:06-CV-761-CSC

a/k/a MARIA COONLEY
 
 
 )

MOTION TO MOVE THE RESPONDENTʼS SELF SURRENDER DATE 48 HOURS

COMES NOW, the respondent, Maria Coonley, by and through counsel and 

states as follows:

1. The respondent was ordered to turn herself in to the Marshallʼs before 12 noon on 

August 26, 2008 by order of this Court on August 22, 2008.

2. The undersigned counsel had left the office prior to that order being received by 

efiling.

3. Today, (August 25, 2008) the undersigned informed the respondent of the order.

4. The respondent respectfully requests an additional 48 hours to get the affairs of 

herself and her two children in order prior to turning herself in to the Marshalls.

5. As the undersigned will be out of town tomorrow (August 26, 2008) it will be 

extraordinarily difficult to advise the respondent and her family together of their 

legal rights prior to her surrender.

6. The respondent has complied with the terms of her release and will continue to do 

so until she surrenders herself.

WHEREFORE, the respondent requests an additional 48 hours of release to deal 

properly with her legal and personal affairs.


 
 
 
 
 
 Respectfully submitted,

Case 3:06-cv-00761-CSC Document 50 Filed 08/25/2008 Page 1 of 2






 ____________//s/Ben Bruner___________


 
 
 
 
 
 Ben Bruner
 


Attorney at Law

505 S. Perry Street

Montgomery, Alabama 36104

(334) 323 4463

 Certificate of Service

 I hereby certify that on June 6, 2008, I electronically filed the foregoing with the

Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system, which will send notification of such filing

to the following: Christopher Snyder Assistant U.S. Attorney






 /s/ Ben Bruner


 
 
 
 
 Ben Bruner
 



 
 
 
 Attorney at Law


 
 
 
 505 S. Perry Street


 
 
 
 Montgomery, Alabama 36104


 
 
 
 (334) 323 4463









Case 3:06-cv-00761-CSC Document 50 Filed 08/25/2008 Page 2 of 2
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 220 (Tuesday, November 15, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 70703]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-29427]

========================================================================
Notices
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules 
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings 
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings, 
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency 
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents 
appearing in this section.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 220 / Tuesday, November 15, 2011 / 
Notices

[[Page 70703]]

AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT

Senior Executive Service: Membership of Performance Review Board

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice lists approved candidates who will comprise a 
standing roster for service on the Agency's 2011 and 2012 SES 
Performance Review Boards. The Agency will use this roster to select 
SES board members, and an outside member(s) for the convening SES 
Performance Review Board each year. The standing roster is as follows:

Allen, Colleen
Brause, Jon
Capozzola, Christa
Carroll, Sean
Chan, Carol
Crumbly, Angelique
Eugenia, Mercedes
Foley, Jason
Gomer, Lisa
Gottlieb, Gregory
Horton, Jerry
McNerney, Angela
O'Neill, Maura
Ostermeyer, David
Pascocello, Susan
Peters, James
Warren, Wade
Wells, Barry
Wiggins, Sandra
Barry Socks, Outside SES Member
John Acton, Outside SES Member
Barbara Pabotoy, Outside SES Member

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Melissa Jackson, (202) 712-1781.

    Dated: October 25, 2011.
Vanessa Prout,
Division Chief, Employee and Labor Relations Division.
[FR Doc. 2011-29427 Filed 11-14-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
```
2810.002 Procedures.

(a) Market research must be conducted in accordance with DOJ sustainability policies and

procedures in order to determine whether there are any sustainable acquisition standards applicable

to the desired product or service.

(b) Ensure the statement of work includes sustainability requirements in accordance with JAR

2823.103, when applicable.

Parent topic: PART 2810 - MARKET RESEARCH