alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
PGI 217.202 Use of options.       (1) Options may be used for foreign military sales (FMS) requirements.          (2) For sole source major systems for U.S. and U.S./FMS combined procurements, contracting officers, in coordination with program managers, are encouraged to—          (i) Establish priced options for two years beyond the base year, so that negotiations of major systems will be conducted approximately every three years; and          (ii) In those cases where exact quantities are subject to variation, or FMS customers are not yet identified, establish range option pricing for both U.S. and FMS quantities.          (3) Consider use of surge options to support industrial capability. A surge option allows the Government, prior to final delivery, to—          (i) Accelerate the contractor's production rate in accordance with a surge production plan or a delivery schedule provided by the contractor under the terms of the contract; and          (ii) Purchase additional quantities of supplies or services.          (4) See DFARS Subpart 217.74 for limitations on the use of undefinitized options.    **Parent topic:** PGI 217.2 -OPTIONS
#### § 603.1205 Advance.

A payment made to a recipient before the recipient disburses the funds for program purposes. Advance payments may be based upon a recipient's request or a predetermined payment schedule.
H. Res. 469

In the House of Representatives, U.S., 

September 29, 2005.

Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it 

shall be in order without intervention of any point of order 

to consider in the House the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 68) 

making continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2006, 

and for other purposes. The joint resolution shall be considered as read. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the joint resolution to final passage without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate equally divided 

and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member 

of the Committee on Appropriations; and (2) one motion to 

recommit. 

SEC. 2. It shall be in order at any time on the legislative 

day of Thursday, October 6, 2005, for the Speaker to entertain motions that the House suspend the rules. The Speaker 

or his designee shall consult with the Minority Leader or her 

designee on the designation of any matter for consideration 

pursuant to this resolution. 
2

•HRES 469 EH 

SEC. 3. A motion to proceed pursuant to section 2908 

of the Defense Base Closure and Realignment Act of 1990 

shall be in order only if offered by the Majority Leader or 

his designee. 

Attest:

Clerk.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsBOREAS TE-22 Allometric Forest Survey DataThe Boreal Ecosystem-Atmospheric Study (BOREAS) TE-22 (Terrestrial Ecology) team collected data sets in support of its efforts to characterize and interpret information on the forest structure of boreal vegetation in the Southern and Northern Study Areas (SSA and NSA) during the 1994 growing season. The data are stored in tabular ASCII files. The data files are available on a CD-ROM (see document number 20010000884), or from the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) Distributed Active Archive Center (DAAC).Document ID20010005252Acquisition SourceGoddard Space Flight CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsShugart, H. H.*(Virginia Univ. Charlottesville, VA United States)*Nielsen, Eric*(Virginia Univ. Charlottesville, VA United States)*Hall, Forrest G.*(NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt, MD United States)*Papagno, Andrea*(Raytheon Information Technology and Scientific Services Greenbelt, MD United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 7, 2013Publication DateOctober 1, 2000Subject CategoryEarth Resources And Remote SensingReport/Patent NumberRept-2000-03136-0/VOL186NAS 1.15:209891/VOL186NASA/TM-2000-209891/VOL 186Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 462-33-01Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20010005252.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 451 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 451

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                    September 21, 2005.
    Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker 
may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XVIII, declare the House resolved into the 
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of the 
bill (H.R. 250) to establish an interagency committee to coordinate Federal 
manufacturing research and development efforts in manufacturing, strengthen 
existing programs to assist manufacturing innovation and education, and expand 
outreach programs for small and medium-sized manufacturers, and for other 
purposes. The first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. All points of 
order against consideration of the bill are waived. General debate shall be 
confined to the bill and shall not exceed one hour equally divided and 
controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on 
Science. After general debate the bill shall be considered for amendment under 
the five-minute rule. It shall be in order to consider as an original bill for 
the purpose of amendment under the five-minute rule the amendment in the nature 
of a substitute recommended by the Committee on Science now printed in the bill. 
The committee amendment in the nature of a substitute shall be considered as 
read. All points of order against the committee amendment in the nature of a 
substitute are waived. Notwithstanding clause 11 of rule XVIII, no amendment to 
the committee amendment in the nature of a substitute shall be in order except 
those printed in the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this 
resolution. Each such amendment may be offered only in the order printed in the 
report, may be offered only by a Member designated in the report, shall be 
considered as read, shall be debatable for the time specified in the report 
equally divided and controlled by the proponent and an opponent, shall not be 
subject to amendment, and shall not be subject to a demand for division of the 
question in the House or in the Committee of the Whole. All points of order 
against such amendments are waived. At the conclusion of consideration of the 
bill for amendment the Committee shall rise and report the bill to the House 
with such amendments as may have been adopted. Any Member may demand a separate 
vote in the House on any amendment adopted in the Committee of the Whole to the 
bill or to the committee amendment in the nature of a substitute. The previous 
question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to 
final passage without intervening motion except one motion to recommit with or 
without instructions.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

BERTHA ALLEN, #134004, )

)

 Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:06-CV-772-WKW

)

TALLAPOOSA COUNTY JAIL STAFF, et al., )

)

 Defendants. )

ORDER ON MOTION

Upon consideration of the motion for extension of time filed by the plaintiff on

November 15, 2006 (Court Doc. No. 13), and for good cause, it is 

ORDERED that this motion be and is hereby GRANTED. It is further 

ORDERED that the plaintiff be GRANTED an extension from November 20, 2006

to and including December 11, 2006 to file a response to the defendants' special report.

Done this 16th day of November, 2006.

 /s/ Delores R. Boyd 

DELORES R. BOYD 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-00772-WKW-TFM Document 14 Filed 11/16/2006 Page 1 of 1
#### § 20.2301 Applications for exemptions.

The Commission may, upon application by a licensee or upon its own initiative, grant an exemption from the requirements of the regulations in this part if it determines the exemption is authorized by law and would not result in undue hazard to life or property.
#### § 501.140 Purpose and scope.

DOE may issue rulings in accordance with the provisions of this subpart. DOE will publish each ruling in the Federal Register and in 10 CFR part 518. A person is entitled to rely upon a ruling to the extent provided in this subpart.
§ 209.23 Conduct of meetings. ( a ) Meetings to develop a voluntary agreement held pursuant to this subpart shall be open to all interested persons. Interested persons desiring to attend meetings under this subpart may be required pursuant to notice to advise the Administrator in advance.
( b ) Interested persons may, as set out in notice provided by the Administrator, present data, views, and arguments orally and in writing, subject to such reasonable limitations with respect to the manner of presentation as the Administrator may impose.
§ 50.67 Accident source term. ( a ) *Applicability.* The requirements of this section apply to all holders of operating licenses issued prior to January 10, 1997, and holders of renewed licenses under part 54 of this chapter whose initial operating license was issued prior to January 10, 1997, who seek to revise the current accident source term used in their design basis radiological analyses.
( b ) *Requirements.* ( 1 ) A licensee who seeks to revise its current accident source term in design basis radiological consequence analyses shall apply for a license amendment under § 50.90. The application shall contain an evaluation of the consequences of applicable design basis accidents[1] previously analyzed in the safety analysis report.
( 2 ) The NRC may issue the amendment only if the applicant's analysis demonstrates with reasonable assurance that: ( i ) An individual located at any point on the boundary of the exclusion area for any 2-hour period following the onset of the postulated fission product release, would not receive a radiation dose in excess of 0.25 Sv (25 rem)[2] total effective dose equivalent (TEDE).
( ii ) An individual located at any point on the outer boundary of the low population zone, who is exposed to the radioactive cloud resulting from the postulated fission product release (during the entire period of its passage), would not receive a radiation dose in excess of 0.25 Sv (25 rem) total effective dose equivalent (TEDE).
( iii ) Adequate radiation protection is provided to permit access to and occupancy of the control room under accident conditions without personnel receiving radiation exposures in excess of 0.05 Sv (5 rem) total effective dose equivalent (TEDE) for the duration of the accident.
[64 FR 72001, Dec. 23, 1999] Footnotes -
50.67
[1] The fission product release assumed for these calculations should be based upon a major accident, hypothesized for purposes of design analyses or postulated from considerations of possible accidental events, that would result in potential hazards not exceeded by those from any accident considered credible. Such accidents have generally been assumed to result in substantial meltdown of the core with subsequent release of appreciable quantities of fission products.
[2] 2 The use of 0.25 Sv (25 rem) TEDE is not intended to imply that this value constitutes an acceptable limit for emergency doses to the public under accident conditions. Rather, this 0.25 Sv (25 rem) TEDE value has been stated in this section as a reference value, which can be used in the evaluation of proposed design basis changes with respect to potential reactor accidents of exceedingly low probability of occurrence and low risk of public exposure to radiation.
2016.506-70 Contract provisions and clauses.       The contracting officer shall insert the following clauses in all solicitations and contracts that contain task order procedures. These clauses may be altered by the contracting officer to fit the circumstances of the requirement.          (a) Section 2052.216-72, Task Order Procedures;          (b) Section 2052.216-73, Accelerated Task Order Procedures.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 2016.5 - Indefinite-Delivery Contracts
Second Department,

June, 1980

(June 4, 1980) 

#### In the Matter of William Cahn, Petitioner. Grievance Committee for the Second and Eleventh Judicial Districts, Respondent.

—Motion by petitioner (1) for reargument of his fllotion to (A) vacate or modify the order of this court, dated October 24, 1977, which struck his name from the roll of attorneys and counselors at law; (B) to deem said order one of suspension; (C) to set aside the suspension pending determination of the proceeding herein suggested; (D) to refer the matter to a Referee, etc., for hearings, and (E) to impose such discipline as this court deems just and proper, or in the alternative, (2) for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals from the order of this court, dated January 14,1980. Motion by petitioner for reargument, denied. Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals from the order of this court, dated January 14, 1980, granted. Questions of law have arisen, which in our opinion ought to be reviewed by the Court of Appeals. The following question is certified, “Was the order of this court, dated January 14, 1980 properly made?”. Mollen, P. J., Hopkins, Damiani, Titone and Mangano, JJ., concur.
#### In the Matter of Joel R. Brandes, Respondent. Mary W. Harris et al., Appellants.

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR 3102 (subd [e]) in aid of discovery in a matrimonial action commenced in the State of Massachusetts, three nonparty witnesses appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered February 21, 1980, as denied, in part, their motion to vacate an ex parte order of the same court dated October 26, 1979, which, *inter alia,*directed them to submit to depositions upon oral questions. Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, with $50 costs and disbursements. The appellants are the parents and brother of Mrs. Mary Ann Livens, who is a defendant in a matrimonial action in Massachusetts. In or about June of 1979 Mr. Livens moved, in the Massachusetts action, to *639take the appellants’ oral depositions in New York and requested that the court issue commissions for that purpose. The motion was granted and the commissions were issued. When the appellants refused to attend depositions or produce the requested documents, petitioner, an attorney, was retained in New York. As a result of a motion made by Mr. Livens in September, 1979 a Massachusetts court reissued the commissions to petitioner and granted him the authority to request the documents originally requested. Upon motion by petitioner, the appellants were ordered to appear for the oral depositions and produce the records requested. This order was subsequently modified by limiting the production of the documents requested to those in the appellants’ possession. CPLR 3102 (subd [e]) provides: "(e) Action pending in another jurisdiction. When under any mandate, writ or commission issued out of any court of record in any other state, territory, district or foreign jurisdiction, or whenever upon notice or agreement, it is required to take the testimony of a witness in the state, he may be compelled to appear and testify in the same manner and by the same process as may be employed for the purpose of taking testimony in actions pending in the state. The supreme court or a county court shall make any appropriate order in aid of taking such a deposition.” This procedure is to be liberally construed (CPLR 104; *Matter of Baltimore Jewelry Co.,*152 NYS2d 793). When an objection is raised by the witness to be examined, our courts need only "observe that his fundamental rights are preserved, that the scope of inquiry is within the issues of the pending action, and that the examination is a fair one” *(Matter of Baltimore Jewelry Co., supra,*p 795). Contrary to the appellants’ claim, CPLR 3102 (subd [e]) does not require a showing of special circumstances, as is required under CPLR 3101 (subd [a], par [4]). Since there is no question that the scope of the inquiry herein is relevant to the pending action and is otherwise proper, the order of Special Term must be affirmed. Damiani, J. P., Lazer, Mangano and Cohalan, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
the undersigned officers of Longs Drug Stores Corporation (the Company) hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:

(i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended July 26, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |                                                                                                 
|--------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: August 22, 2007 |  | /s/ WARREN F. BRYANT                                                                            
|                      |  | Warren F. Bryant Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive
Officer)  
|                      | 
|Date: August 22, 2007 |  | /s/ STEVEN F. MCCANN                                                                            
|                      |  | Steven F. McCann Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial
Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Longs Drug Stores Corporation and will be retained by Longs Drug Stores Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
808.000 Scope of part.       This part deals with prioritizing sources of supplies and services for use by the Government based on unique VA statutory programs, as well as requirements when using the General Services Administration (GSA) Federal Supply Schedules program including the GSA delegated VA Federal Supply Schedule program.    **Parent topic:** PART 808 - REQUIRED SOURCES OF SUPPLIES AND SERVICES
Case 2:06-cv-00749-ID-SRW     Document 8      Filed 10/03/2006     Page 1 of 2

Case 2:06-cv-00749-ID-SRW     Document 8      Filed 10/03/2006     Page 2 of 2
# EUR-Lex - 31976R0143 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31976R0143

**Council Regulation (ECSC, EEC, Euratom) No 143/76 of 20 January 1976 adapting the representation and special-duty allowances for the President and members of the Commission and the President, Judges, Advocates-General and Registrar of the Court of Justice **

*
Official Journal L 015 , 24/01/1976 P. 0002 - 0002 Finnish special edition: Chapter 1 Volume 1 P. 0115 Greek special edition: Chapter 01 Volume 2 P. 0009 Swedish special edition: Chapter 1 Volume 1 P. 0115 Spanish special edition: Chapter 01 Volume 2 P. 0037 Portuguese special edition Chapter 01 Volume 2 P. 0037 *

COUNCIL REGULATION (ECSC, EEC, EURATOM) No 143/76 of 20 January 1976 adapting the representation and special-duty allowances for the President and members of the Commission and the President, Judges, Advocates-General and Registrar of the Court of Justice

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to Council Regulation No 422/67/EEC, No 5/67/Euratom of 25 July 1967 determining the emoluments of the President and members of the Commission and of the President, Judges, Advocates-General and Registrar of the Court of Justice (1), as last amended by Council Regulation (ECSC, EEC, Euratom) No 1546/73 (2), and in particular Article 4 (4) thereof,

Whereas the representation and special-duty allowances provided for under Article 4 (2) and (3) of Regulation No 422/67/EEC, No 5/67/Euratom should be increased,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

With effect from 1 January 1976: - the amounts listed in Article 4 (2) of Regulation No 422/67/EEC, No 5/67/Euratom shall be as follows: >PIC FILE= "T0009632">

- the amounts listed in the first subparagraph of Article 4 (3) of Regulation No 422/67/EEC, No 5/67/Euratom shall be as follows: >PIC FILE= "T0009633">

- the amount listed in the second subparagraph of Article 4 (3) of Regulation No 422/67/EEC, No 5/67/Euratom shall be replaced by the sum of Bfrs 19 550.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 20 January 1976.

For the Council

The President

G. THORN (1)OJ No 187, 8.8.1967, p. 1. (2)OJ No L 155, 11.7.1973, p. 8.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

NATIONAL VEHICLE AND FUEL EMISSIONS LABORATORY

2000 TRAVERWOOD ROAD

ANN ARBOR, MI 48105-2498

 OFFICE OF

AIR AND RADIATION

July 18, 2011

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Meeting with Ford on May 20, 2011

FROM: Don Kopinski

TO: Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0162

This memorandum documents a meeting held on May 20, 2011 between Ford and EPA staff. 

The following people attended:

Ford: Cynthia Wiliams, Ken McAlinden

EPA: Byron Bunker, Angela Cullen, Cle Jackson, Chuck Moulis, Bob Peavyhouse, Don 

Kopinski

The discussion focused on potential flexibility provisions for vocational gasoline engines, 

analytically derived CO2, extending HD GHG mileage limit on certification vehicles, using part 

1065 for gasoline engines, and Ford HDV configurations. The non-confidential portions of 

presentations made by Ford staff are attached.

Attachments (2)