alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-7596
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus RONALD LANTHRON, Defendant - Appellant.

No. 02-6002
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus RONALD LANTHRON, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. (CA-01-465-5-BO)2 Submitted: February 28, 2002 Decided: March 13, 2002 Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ronald Lanthron, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).3 PER CURIAM: On consolidated appeals, Ronald Lanthron seeks to appeal thedistrict court’s orders denying his motion, filed on a form pertaining to motions under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2001), but that we construe as a habeas corpus petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994). He also challenges the district court’s order denying his motion for a certificate of appealability. Because Lanthron’s challenge to a court martial is properly addressed under § 2241, Burns v. Wilson , 346 U.S. 137 (1953), the district court erred in dismissing the petition based on the time limits applicable to motions under § 2255. However, as the district court correctly noted in its denial of Lanthron’s motion for a certificate of appealability, Lanthron did not meet the custody requirement applicable to habeas corpus petitions. 28 U.S.C. § 2241(c)(3); see Garlotte v. Fordice , 515 U.S. 39, 40 (1995). Accordingly, we affirm the denial of relief on the basis that Lanthron was not in custody, depriving the district court of jurisdiction over the petition. We grant Lanthron’s motion to supplement the record. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1098 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1098

   Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives to raise the 
                     awareness of alopecia areata.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            December 6, 2006

Mr. Ryan of Ohio (for himself and Mr. Tierney) submitted the following 
  resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

   Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives to raise the 
                     awareness of alopecia areata.

Whereas alopecia areata is a common autoimmune skin disease resulting in the 
        loss of hair on the scalp and elsewhere on the body;
Whereas alopecia areata is a common but very challenging and capricious disease 
        affecting approximately 2 percent of the American population, amounting 
        to more than 4.7 million people in the United States;
Whereas, with alopecia areata, the affected hair follicles are mistakenly 
        attacked by a person's immune system, resulting in the loss of hair;
Whereas, although not life-threatening, alopecia areata is most certainly life-
        altering, and its sudden onset, recurrent episodes, and unpredictable 
        course have a serious effect on a person's life and functional status at 
        work, school, and everyday life; and
Whereas because much of the public is not familiar with alopecia areata, the 
        reaction of the public to the disease can have a profound psychological 
        impact on the lives of those disrupted by this disease: Now, therefore, 
        be it
    Resolved,  That it is the sense of the House of Representatives 
that an appropriate week should be designated as National Alopecia 
Areata Awareness Week.
                                 <all>
```
IV 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 294

Supporting the goals of ‘‘A Day of Commemoration of the Great Upheaval’’, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 24, 2005

Mr. BOUSTANY submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Government Reform 

RESOLUTION

Supporting the goals of ‘‘A Day of Commemoration of the 

Great Upheaval’’, and for other purposes.

Whereas on March 3, 1699, France established the French 

colony of Louisiana, and this event was commemorated in 

1999 as FrancoFeˆte 99 and the Congre`s Mondial 

Acadien-Louisiane 1999; 

Whereas on December 9, 2003, a royal proclamation was 

signed in Canada in which Queen Elizabeth II acknowledged for the first time the wrongs committed in the 

name of the English Crown during the Acadian deportation of 1755; 

Whereas this royal proclamation sets July 28th of every year, 

beginning in 2005, as ‘‘A Day of Commemoration of the 

Great Upheaval’’; 
2

•HRES 294 IH 

Whereas the 10,000 men, women, and children exiled from 

Nova Scotia two and a half centuries ago are the ancestors of many of south Louisiana’s French-Acadian or 

Cajun people; 

Whereas in 1803, President Thomas Jefferson purchased the 

Louisiana territory from France, and the French Napoleonic Civil Code was adopted as the basis of Louisiana’s 

civil law system which continues to the present; 

Whereas in 1968, the Louisiana Legislature created the 

Council for the Development of French in Louisiana 

(CODOFIL) and mandated that the agency promote 

French for economic, educational, and touristic purposes; 

Whereas since its creation, CODOFIL has recruited teachers 

from the international community to come to Louisiana 

to teach French in Louisiana schools; 

Whereas there are 30 French immersion schools in Louisiana, and Louisiana leads the Nation in bilingual education; 

Whereas Louisiana is officially bilingual pursuant to section 

51 of title 1, Louisiana Revised Statutes, which states 

‘‘Any act or contract made or executed in the French language is as legal and binding upon the parties as if it 

had been made or executed in the English language’’; 

Whereas in 2004, the Louisiana Legislature declared Acadian 

Heritage Week to be the third week in September and 

urged schools in Louisiana to teach children about their 

Acadian history, culture, and heritage; and 

Whereas in 2005, the world will memorialize the 250th anniversary of the Acadian deportation and observe a day of 

remembrance of the suffering of the Acadian people as a 

result of their deportation by the British Crown (as me-
3

•HRES 294 IH 

morialized in Queen Elizabeth II’s Royal Proclamation 

dated December 9, 2003): Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

2 (1) supports of the goals of Acadian Heritage 

3 Week; and 

4 (2) supports the goals of ‘‘A Day of Commemo5 ration of the Great Upheaval’’, as established by 

6 Queen Elizabeth II’s Royal Proclamation, signed on 

7 December 9, 2003, in which the sufferings of the 

8 Acadian people were acknowledged.

Æ
PGI 219.800 General.       A copy of the Partnership Agreement (PA) between DoD and the Small Business Administration (SBA) is available here.    **Parent topic:** PGI 219.8 -CONTRACTING WITH THE SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION (THE 8(A) PROGRAM)
**GGD-00-196R**                      Published: Sep 21, 2000. Publicly Released: Sep 25, 2000.                  

-   
-   
-   
-   

    Jump To:  
-  Elder Abuse 
-  Services for Older Adults 
-  State and Local-Level Drivers and Trends 
-  State and Local Fiscal Projections 
-  Federal Borrowing 
-  Managing the Debt 
-  Summary of Funding Provisions 
-  Auditing the Government's Books 
-  Unpacking the Financial Report 
-  Highlights 
-  Recommendations 
-  Background 
-  About This Work 
-  About This Work 
-  Trends 
-  About the Center 
-  Why It's High Risk 
-  What Remains To Be Done 
-  Key Reports 
-  Newest COVID-Related Reports 
-  AI Use Cases 
-  Flood Insurance 
-  Past Pandemic-Related Reports 
-  CARES Act Oversight Reports 
-  All COVID-19 Reports 
-  Report Suspected Fraud 
-  Subjects 
-  How to Get Notified 
-  Past Reports 
-  Public Health Threats 
-  Explore the FY 2022 and 2023 Funds 
-  Status of FY22 Projects 
-  Lessons Learned 
-  Agency Reports 
-  Recent Reports 
-  Recommendations 
-  Supplemental Material 
-  Full Report 
-  Additional Data 
-  View Decision 
-  Downloads 
-  Previously Identified Actions 
-  Related Pages 
-  Associated Agencies 
-  Tough Choices and Opportunities Ahead 
-  Americas Fiscal Future Key Areas 
-  Retirement Security Key Areas 
-  Current List 
-  About The High Risk List 
-  Area Ratings 
-  Previous High Risk Products 
-  Search Federal Vacancies 
-  Past Federal Vacancies 
-  Violation Letters 
-  About the Yellow Book 
-  Advisory Council 
-  Related Resources 
-  Comment Letters 
-  Related Publications 
-  Contacts and Resources 
-  Major Issues Facing the Nation 
-  Meeting Strategic Challenges 
-  Additional Resources 
-  Resources 
-  GAO Contacts 
-  Mission Teams 
-  Operations and Staff Offices  
-  Organization Chart  
-  Why a Career at GAO? 
-  Am I Qualified? 
-  Company Culture 
-  Reasonable Accommodations 
-  Video Gallery 
-  Paid Internships 
-  Student Volunteers 
-  Professional Development Program 
-  Advancement 
-  Executive Candidate Program 
-  Summer Associates 
-  Externships 
-  Benefits 
-  Contacts 

Skip to Highlights

## Highlights

Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO provided information on the number of federal and state court cases that invoked the Year 2000 (Y2K) Act and the characteristics of those cases.

## Full Report

Full Report (28 pages)

## Office of Public Affairs

### Media Inquiries

Sarah Kaczmarek
kaczmareks@gao.gov

(202) 512-4800

### Public Inquiries

Public Affairs
PublicAffairs@gao.gov

(202) 512-4800

## Topics

Health Care

Courts (law)Federal courtsJurisdictional authorityStatistical dataSystems conversionsY2KAlternative dispute resolutionDefendantsLaw courtsLiability insurance
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                         444,509
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  374,059
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    1000792
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1855290
<PP&E>                                          645611
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 2571893
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           569845
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         36000
<OTHER-SE>                                     1529834
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   2571893
<SALES>                                        1100862
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               1100862
<CGS>                                           652133
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   652133
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                327971
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               16320
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 104438
<INCOME-TAX>                                     44000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              60438
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     60438
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .02
        

</TABLE>
1 

### Ogulei, David

From: **Dennis J Warchol <dennis.warchol@veoliaes.com>** Sent: **Wednesday, November 06, 2013 8:58 AM** To: **Ogulei, David** Cc: **Nancy L Paddock** Subject: **RE: Title V Permit Application**



### That fine. We will call you tomorrow after 1:30 PM . Thanks

From: Ogulei, David [mailto:Ogulei.David@epa.gov] Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2013 8:42 AM To: Dennis J Warchol Subject: RE: Title V Permit Application



### I am at an all-day meeting today. Let’s do it tomo rrow afternoon (after 1:30 pm).

From: Dennis J Warchol [mailto:dennis.warchol@veoliaes.c om] Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2013 8:36 AM To: Ogulei, David Subject: Title V Permit Application



### Nancy Paddock will be giving you are call this morn ing between 10:30 AM and 11 AM to discuss you quest ions. I think we have them all figured out. Are you available or is a better time. Thanks

SERVICE FIRST SAFETY ALWAYS

**Dennis J. Warchol EHS Manager** 

**Veolia ES Technical Solutions, L.L.C. Trade Waste Incineration Facility**  **#7 Mobile Avenue Sauget, IL 62201**  **618-271-2804 (ext.169) 618-271-2128 (fax)**  **Dennis.warchol@VeoliaES.com www.VeoliaES.com** 

**This e-mail message from Veolia ES Technical Soluti ons, LLC is for the sole use of the intended recipi**  **ent(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. A**  **ny unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribu tion is prohibited. If**  **you are not the intended recipient, please communic ate with the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all**  **copies of the original message and delete it from all computers.**
PGI 216.703 Basic ordering agreements.

(d)(i) Individual orders under a basic ordering agreement shall be individually closed following

completion of the orders (see FAR 4.804).

(ii) The office issuing the agreement shall furnish all authorized ordering offices sufficient

information for the ordering office to complete its contract reporting responsibilities under DFARS

204.670-2 or, in the case of civilian agencies, the Federal Procurement Data System reporting

requirement. Data furnished to civilian agencies must contain uncoded information about the data

elements and the meanings of the codes to permit these users to translate the data into the federal

format. This data must be furnished to the ordering activity in sufficient time for the activity to

prepare its report for the action within 3 working days of the order.

(iii) Any activity listed in the agreement may issue orders on DD Form 1155, Order for Supplies or

Services, or Standard Form 26, Award/Contract.

Parent topic: PGI 216.7 -AGREEMENTS
exv10w49






Exhibit 10.49




2009 AMENDMENT TO

2009 PERFORMANCE UNITS AGREEMENT




     This 2009 Amendment (the “Amendment”) is entered into effective December 31, 2009, and amends
the Performance Units Agreement dated January 5, 2009 (the “Grant Agreement”) between Peabody
Energy Corporation (the “Company”) and Gregory H. Boyce (the “Grantee”).



RECITALS




     WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Company deems it appropriate and in the best
interests of the Company and the Grantee to amend the Grant Agreement as described herein,
effective on the date set forth above;



     NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THE FOREGOING, the parties hereby agree as follows:



     1. Section 1.15 of the Grant Agreement, which defines “Retirement,”
is revised to read in its entirety as follows:




Section 1.15 — “Retirement” shall mean “Retirement” as defined in the
Grantee’s employment agreement with the Company.



     2. Section 3.2 of the Grant Agreement, which sets forth vesting and termination
conditions for the award, is revised in the following respects:




     a. Paragraph (b) is modified to add the phrase “unless otherwise provided in
Grantee’s employment agreement with the Company in effect on the date of his
employment termination” before the word “upon.”




     b. Paragraph (c) is modified to add the phrase “unless otherwise provided in
Grantee’s employment agreement with the Company in effect on the date of his
employment termination” before the word “upon.”



     3. In all other respects, the Grant Agreement shall remain unchanged and in full
force and effect.



[SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS]




 









 








     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment has been executed and delivered by the parties hereto
on the date first set forth above.



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	PEABODY ENERGY CORPORATION	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	By:

Name:
	 	/s/ W. A. Coley
 

W. A. Coley
	 	 
	 

	 	Its:
	 	Chair, Compensation Committee	 	 






	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	                                                   /s/ G. H. Boyce
 	 
	 	GREGORY H. BOYCE 	 
	 	 	 
	 






2
#### § 1021.100 Purpose.

The purpose of this part is to establish procedures that the Department of Energy (DOE) shall use to comply with section 102(2) of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4332(2)) and the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) regulations for implementing the procedural provisions of NEPA (40 CFR parts 1500-1508). This part supplements, and is to be used in conjunction with, the CEQ Regulations.
### Nebraska Court of Appeals Memorandum Opinions

NOT Selected for Posting to Court Website

(r eleased on or before September 12, 2023 

### )

The following memorandum opinions were filed by the Nebraska Court of

Appeals and can be viewed using SSCALES :



### None Available

The above

- listed memorandum opinions c an be viewed online through the

appellate court case search available by subscription through Nebra ska.gov:

http://www.nebraska.gov/subscriber/

.

Current subscribers to Nebraska.gov can search appellate court cases here:

http s ://www.nebraska.gov/courts/s c cales/

.
§ 600.315 Revision of budget and program plans. ( a ) The budget plan is the financial expression of the project or program as approved during the award process. It includes the sum of the Federal and non-Federal shares when there are cost sharing requirements. The budget plan must be related to performance for program evaluation purposes, whenever appropriate.
( b ) The recipient must obtain the contracting officer's prior approval if a revision is necessary for either of the following two reasons: ( 1 ) A change in the scope or the objective of the project or program (even if there is no associated budget revision requiring prior written approval).
( 2 ) A need for additional Federal funding.
( c ) The recipient must obtain the contracting officer's prior approval if a revision is necessary for any of the following six reasons, unless the requirement for prior approval is specifically waived in the program regulation or terms and conditions of the award: ( 1 ) A change in the approved project director, principal investigator, or other key person specified in the application or award document.
( 2 ) The absence for more than three months, or a 25 percent reduction in time devoted to the project, by the approved project director or principal investigator.
( 3 ) The inclusion of any additional costs that require prior approval in accordance with the applicable costs principles for Federal funds and the requirements applicable to the recipient's cost share or match, as provided in § 600.313 and § 600.317, respectively.
( 4 ) The inclusion of pre-award costs for periods greater than the 90 calendar days immediately preceding the effective date of the award.
( 5 ) A “no-cost” extension of the project period.
( 6 ) Any subaward, transfer, or contracting out of substantive program performance under an award, unless described in the application and funded in the approved awards.
( d ) If specifically required in the program regulation or the terms and conditions of the award, the recipient must obtain the contracting officer's prior approval for the following revisions: ( 1 ) The transfer of funds among direct cost categories, functions, and activities for awards in which the Federal share of the project exceeds $100,000 and the cumulative amount of such transfers exceeds or is expected to exceed 10 percent of the total budget as last approved by DOE.
( 2 ) For awards that provide support for both construction and nonconstruction work, any fund or budget transfers between the two types of work supported.
( e ) Within 30 calendar days from the date of receipt of the recipient's request for budget revisions, the contracting officer must review the request and notify the recipient whether the budget revisions have been approved. If the revision is still under consideration at the end of 30 calendar days, the contracting officer must inform the recipient in writing of the date when the recipient may expect the decision.
#### MARMORA, Respondent, v. INTERNATIONAL RY. CO. et al., Appellants.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

July 7, 1914.)

Action by Andrew Marmora against the International Railway Company and another.

No opinion. Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.
§ 602.5 Epidemiology and Other Health Studies Financial Assistance Program. ( a ) DOE may issue under this part awards for research, education/training, conferences, communication, and related activities in the Office of Environment, Health, Safety and Security program areas set forth in paragraph (b) of this section.
( b ) The program areas are: ( 1 ) Health experience of DOE and DOE contractor workers;
( 2 ) Health experience of populations living near DOE facilities;
( 3 ) Workers exposed to toxic substances, such as beryllium;
( 4 ) Use of biomarkers to recognize exposure to toxic substances;
( 5 ) Epidemiology and other health studies relating to energy production, transmission, and use (including electromagnetic fields) in the United States and abroad;
( 6 ) Compilation, documentation, management, use, and analysis of data for the DOE Comprehensive Epidemiologic Data Resource; and
( 7 ) Other systems or activities enhancing these areas, as well as other program areas as may be described by notice published in the Federal Register.
[60 FR 5841, Jan. 31, 1995, as amended at 71 FR 68729, Nov. 28, 2006; 79 FR 76046, Dec. 19, 2014; 80 FR 5007, Jan. 30, 2015]
#### Mildred Merlo *v.*Planning and Zoning Commission of the Town of Wethersfield

*Vincent F. Sabatini,*in support of the petition.

*Paul J. Aparo,*in opposition.

Decided June 5, 1984

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 1 Conn. App. 621, is granted.
### E.O. 12866 NESHA **P for A rea Sources: Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers; 2060**  **- AR14** 

**Ma ry Johnson**  to: Higgins, Cortney Cc : Peter Tsirigotis, RobertJ W ayland, Jonathan Averback, Thomas Gillis, Jim Eddinger From: Mary Johnson/RTP/USEPA/US To: "Higgins, Cortney" <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov> Cc: Peter Tsirigotis/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, RobertJ W ayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Jonathan Averback/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Thomas

Gillis/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Jim Eddinger/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA Cortney, Attached is the NESHAP for Area Sources: Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers - Final rule; notice of final action on reconsideration, per your request as part of the E.O. 12866 interagency review process. P lease let us know if you have any questions. Thank you.

EO 12866 NESHAP for Area Sources ICI Boilers 2060 - AR14_092112.docx Mary Johnson Environmental Engineer U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Mail Code D 243 - 01 Research Triangle Park, NC 2 7711 Phone: ( 919) 541 - 5025 Fax: ( 919) 541 - 5450