alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES 

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NOTHERN DIVISION 

DONNA DORSEY DAVIS, etc. ) 

 Plaintiff, ) 

vs. ) CIVIL ACTION NO: 

RICHARD M. DORSEY, etc., ) 2:06CV766-MHT 

 and CD & O, LLC, etc., ) 

 Defendants. ) 

 

 ENTRY OF APPEARANCE (Co-Counsel) 

 The undersigned attorney hereby files this entry of appearance on behalf of 

the Plaintiff as co-counsel in the above styled case and requests that all further 

notices, pleadings, orders, and dockets be sent to both the Plaintiff’s attorneys. 

 This 15th day of February, 2007. 

 

 __s/ James E.Roberts__________ 

 James E. Roberts 

 ASB – 6297-B38J 

 Attorney for the Plaintiff 

4908 Cahaba River Road 

Birmingham, Alabama 35243 

205-970-7775 

 

 

Case 2:06-cv-00766-MHT-TFM Document 15 Filed 02/22/2007 Page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

 I hereby certify that on this 15th day of February, 2007, I electronically filed 

the foregoing with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system and have 

served a copy of same electronically and placing a copy of same in the United 

States Mail, Postage repaid and properly address to: 

Clifford W. Cleveland Lindsay B. Erwin 

Post Office Box 680689 P.O. Box 9031 

Prattville, Alabama 36068 Columbus, GA 31908-9031 

 

 This 15th day of February, 2007. 

 

 __s/ James E. Roberts_______ 

 James E. Roberts 

Case 2:06-cv-00766-MHT-TFM Document 15 Filed 02/22/2007 Page 2 of 2
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****National drug threat assessment**
 
2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009
2010 | 2011 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016| 2017 | 2018 | 2019
2020
 
SuDoc Number:J 1.112/2:
Item Number:0717-A-41 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000597939
 
October 15, 2018
#### Peterson Agency, Inc., *Appellee,*v. Charles L. White and Madaline H. White, *Appellants.*

No. 47,848

Opinion filed January 24, 1976.

*Thomas J. Berscheidt,*of Ward and Bercheidt, of Great Bend, argued the cause and was on the brief for the appellants.

*Kenneth*C. *Havner,*of Hays, argued the cause, and *Larry L. Kopke,*of Great Bend, was on the brief for the appellee.

Harman, C.

Judgment modified and reversed with directions.
###### Editorial Note on Part 34

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 34 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

#### § 34.1 Purpose and scope.

This part prescribes requirements for the issuance of licenses for the use of sealed sources containing byproduct material and radiation safety requirements for persons using these sealed sources in industrial radiography. The provisions and requirements of this part are in addition to, and not in substitution for, other requirements of this chapter. In particular, the requirements and provisions of parts 19, 20, 21, 30, 37, 71, 150, 170, and 171 of this chapter apply to applications and licenses subject to this part. This rule does not apply to medical uses of byproduct material.

[78 FR 17006, Mar. 19, 2013]
EX-34.1


(logo) pwc


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors, PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.:

We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying Report on
Assessment of Compliance with Regulation AB Servicing Criteria, that Midland
Loan Services, a division of PNC Bank, National Association ("Midland" or the
"Company") complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the
Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for the commercial
mortgage-backed securities transactions (the "Platform"), as of December 31,
2013 and for the year then ended, excluding criteria 1122(d)(1)(iii),
1122(d)(3)(i)(B), 1122(d)(3)(i)(C), 1122(d)(3)(i)(D), 1122(d)(3)(ii),
1122(d)(3)(iii), 1122(d)(3)(iv), and 1122(d)(4)(xv), which the Company has
determined are not applicable to the servicing activities performed by it with
respect to the Platform. Management is responsible for the Company's compliance
with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on
management's assertion based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly,
included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance
with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as
we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing
of selected asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform,
testing of selected servicing activities related to the Platform, and
determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and
performed those selected activities in compliance with the applicable servicing
criteria. Our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing
activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report.
Our procedures were not designed to detect noncompliance arising from errors
that may have occurred prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have
affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during
the period covered by this report. We believe that our examination provides a
reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal
determination on the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, management's assertion that Midland complied with the
aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2013 for the Platform is fairly stated, in all material respects.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

February 24, 2014


PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, 1100 Walnut, Suite 1300, Kansas City, MO 64106
T: (816) 472 7921, F: (816) 218 1890, www.pwc.com/us
Case 2:06-cv-00767-MEF-SRW Document 18 Filed 11/08/2006 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:06-cv-00767-MEF-SRW Document 18 Filed 11/08/2006 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 31.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Craig A. Hewitt, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of AccuPoll Holding
Corp.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions);

(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.


March 14, 2005                                  /s/ Craig A. Hewitt
                                                --------------------------------
                                                    Craig A. Hewitt
                                                    Chief Financial Officer
# Subpart 1915.1 - General Requirements for Negotiation

**Parent topic:**PART 1915 - CONTRACTING BY NEGOTIATION

## 1915.106 Contract clauses.

## 1915.106-70 Key personnel and facilities.

Whenever contractor selection has been substantially predicated on the contractor's possession of special capabilities (i.e., personnel and/or facilities) the contracting officer shall include the clause at 1952.215-70 in the awarded contract.
#### ROTH v. SPENCER et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

March 3, 1915.)

Action by Max Roth against H. Jay Spencer and another.

No opinion. Motion to dismiss appeal granted, unless the appellant serves and files printed case, and has case ready for argument at the next term of this court, in which case motion is denied. See, also, 158 App. Div. 895, 142 N. Y. Supp. 1142.
September 29, 2015



### JUDGMENT


## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

ELI E NASSAR AND RHONDA NA SSAR , Appellant s

NO. 14

- 14

- 00277

- CV V.

LIBERTY MUTUA L FIRE INSURANCE COM PANY, LIBERTY MUTUAL
GROUP , DAVE BAKER, MARY H AMILTON AND MARCUS SMITH

, Appellee s

________________________________ This cause, an appeal from the judgment in favor of appellee s , Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company, Liberty Mutual Gro up , Dave Baker, Mary Hamilton and Marcus Smith, signed March 14, 2014, was heard on the transcript
of the record. We have inspected the record and find no error in the judgment. We order the judgment of the court below AFFIRMED

. We order appellant s , Eli e Nassar and Rhonda Nassar, jointly and severally, to pay all costs incurred in this appeal.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
#### § 602.6 Eligibility.

Any individual or entity other than a Federal agency is eligible for a grant or cooperative agreement. An unaffiliated individual is also eligible for a grant or cooperative agreement.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App), notice is hereby given of a meeting of the Biomedical Library and Informatics Review Committee.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable materials, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         Biomedical Library and Informatics Review Committee.                    

*Date:*                         March 3-4, 2011.                    

*Time:*                         March 3, 2011, 8 a.m. to 6 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Library of Medicine, Building 38, 2nd Floor, Board Room, 8600 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20892.                    

*Time:*                         March 4, 2011, 8 a.m. to 2 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Arthur A. Petrosian, PhD, Chief Scientific Review Officer, Division of Extramural Programs, National Library of Medicine, 6705 Rockledge Drive, Suite 301, Bethesda, MD 20892-7968, 301-496-4253,                         *petrosia@mail.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.879, Medical Library Assistance, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

                        Dated:                         *December 16, 2010.*

Jennifer Spaeth,

Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2010-32102 Filed 12-21-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
_______________________________________ __ 

### Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan



## September 9, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice


## 136494 Michael F. Cavanag h Elizabeth A. Weave r Marilyn Kell y Maura D. Corriga n 

## PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, J ustices



## v SC: 136494 COA: 284026 Genesee CC: 07-021273-FH TYBERRIUS MARTECE ROBERTS, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appe al the April 16, 2008 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

p0828 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 9, 2008

Clerk
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 323 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 323

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                         June 22, 2006.
Whereas an estimated 12,400 children will be diagnosed with cancer in the year 
        2005;
Whereas cancer is the leading cause of death by disease in children under age 
        15;
Whereas an estimated 2,300 children will die from cancer in the year 2005;
Whereas the incidence of cancer among children in the United States is rising by 
        about one percent each year;
Whereas 1 in every 330 Americans develops cancer before age 20;
Whereas approximately 8 percent of deaths of those between 1 and 19 years old 
        are caused by cancer;
Whereas while some progress has been made, a number of promising opportunities 
        for childhood cancer research still remain untapped;
Whereas limited resources for childhood cancer research can hinder the 
        recruitment of investigators and physicians to pediatric oncology;
Whereas peer-reviewed clinical trials are the standard of care for pediatrics 
        and have improved cancer survival rates among children;
Whereas the number of survivors of childhood cancers continues to grow, with 
        about 1 in 640 adults between ages 20 to 39 who have a history of 
        cancer;
Whereas up to two-thirds of childhood cancer survivors are likely to experience 
        at least one late effect from treatment, many of which may be life-
        threatening;
Whereas some late effects of cancer treatment are identified early in follow-up 
        and are easily resolved, while others may become chronic problems in 
        adulthood and may have serious consequences; and
Whereas 89 percent of children with cancer experience substantial suffering in 
        the last month of life: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives that the 
Congress should support--
            (1) public and private sector efforts to promote awareness about the 
        incidence of cancer among children, the signs and symptoms of cancer in 
        children, treatment options, and long-term follow-up;
            (2) pediatric cancer research to improve prevention, diagnosis, 
        treatment, rehabilitation, post-treatment monitoring, and long-term 
        survival;
            (3) policies that encourage medical trainees and investigators to 
        enter the field of pediatric oncology;
            (4) policies that encourage the development of drugs and biologics 
        designed to treat pediatric cancers;
            (5) policies that encourage participation in clinical trials;
            (6) efforts to encourage the incorporation of pain management for 
        pediatric cancer patients into medical education curricula; and
            (7) policies that enhance education, services, and other resources 
        related to late effects from treatment.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Editorial Note on Part 61
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 61 appear at 80 FR 74980, Dec. 1, 2015, and at 81 FR 86909, Dec. 2, 2016.

§ 61.20 Filing and distribution of application. ( a ) An application for a license under this part, and any amendments thereto, must be filed with the Director, must be signed by the applicant or the applicant's authorized representative under oath or affirmation, and, if the document is in paper form, must be the signed original.
( b ) The applicant shall maintain the capability to generate additional copies of the application for distribution in accordance with written instructions from the Director or the Director's designee.
( c ) *Fees.* Application, amendment, and inspection fees applicable to a license covering the receipt and disposal of radioactive wastes in a land disposal facility are required by part 170 of this chapter.
[47 FR 57463, Dec. 27, 1982, as amended at 49 FR 9405, Mar. 12, 1984; 68 FR 58814, Oct. 10, 2003]
§ 62.21 Determination for granting emergency access. ( a ) Not later than (45) days after the receipt of a request for a Commission determination under this part from any generator of low-level radioactive waste, or any Governor on behalf of any generator or generators located in his or her State, the Commission shall determine whether— ( 1 ) Emergency access to a regional disposal facility or a non-Federal disposal facility within a State that is not a member of a Compact for specific low-level radioactive waste is necessary because of an immediate and serious threat— ( i ) To the public health and safety or
( ii ) The common defense and security; and
( 2 ) The threat cannot be mitigated by any alternative consistent with the public health and safety, including those identified in § 62.13.
( b ) In making a determination under this section, the Commission shall be guided by the criteria set forth in § 62.25 of this part.
( c ) A determination under this section must be in writing and contain a full explanation of the facts upon which the determination is based and the reasons for granting or denying the request. An affirmative determination must designate an appropriate non-Federal or regional LLW disposal facility or facilities for the disposal of wastes, specifically describe the low-level radioactive waste as to source, physical and radiological characteristics, and the minimum volume and duration (not to exceed 180 days) necessary to eliminate the immediate threat to public health and safety or the common defense and security. It may also contain conditions upon which the determination is dependent.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     Information taken from June 30, 1998 Form 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 APR-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                               3,874
<SECURITIES>                                        47,852
<RECEIVABLES>                                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    52,940
<PP&E>                                              23,874
<DEPRECIATION>                                     (12,120)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      68,035
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                3,185
<BONDS>                                              2,200
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                            400
<COMMON>                                                24
<OTHER-SE>                                          59,495
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        68,035
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       765
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        6,221
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      (778)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     110
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     (4,788)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 (4,788)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                        (4,788)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        (0.24)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (0.24)
        


</TABLE>