alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
H. Res. 576

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

July 11, 2006.

Whereas Advancement Via Individual Determination (AVID) 

has provided academic and motivational support that has 

enabled more than 95 percent of the over 257,000 underperforming students who have been in its program to go 

on to college; 

Whereas Advancement Via Individual Determination has 

grown over 25 years to more than 2,200 middle and high 

schools in 36 States and Department of Defense schools 

in 15 countries; 

Whereas Advancement Via Individual Determination started 

in 1980 with one teacher and 32 high school students in 

San Diego, California, and developed into an easily replicated program that promotes academic success; 

Whereas students are selected because they are low-income, 

first-generation, college-going students who are underperforming academically; 

Whereas college students support the program with individual 

academic coaching; 

Whereas students are required to take a rigorous, college preparatory curriculum including advanced level courses; 
2

•HRES 576 EH 

Whereas the program provides SAT/ACT preparation, college 

information and financial aid assistance, college visits, 

and motivational experiences; 

Whereas at the end of the first college year, 89 percent of 

Advancement Via Individual Determination students are 

fully eligible and do enroll for their sophomore year compared to a national average of 50 percent; and 

Whereas over 98,000 teachers and administrators have attended training in the high-quality teaching skills that 

support Advancement Via Individual Determination students: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

(1) congratulates Advancement Via Individual Determination students and their teachers on increasing 

college eligibility and attendance; and 

(2) celebrates Advancement Via Individual Determination’s 25 years of success. 

Attest:

Clerk.
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 853 

To prohibit Federal funding to entities that do not certify the entities will 

not perform, or provide any funding to any other entity that performs, 

an abortion. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 3, 2017 

Mrs. BLACK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To prohibit Federal funding to entities that do not certify 

the entities will not perform, or provide any funding 

to any other entity that performs, an abortion. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protecting Life and 

5 Taxpayers Act of 2017’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON ABORTION. 

7 (a) PROHIBITION.—No Federal funds may be pro8 vided (directly or indirectly, including through contract or 

9 subcontract) to an entity unless the entity certifies that, 


smartinez on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 853 IH

1 during the period for which such funds are provided, the 

2 entity will not perform, and will not provide any funds 

3 to any other entity that performs, an abortion. 

4 (b) EXCEPTION.—Subsection (a) does not apply with 

5 respect to an abortion where— 

6 (1) the pregnancy is the result of rape or in7 cest; or 

8 (2) a physician certifies that the woman suffers 

9 from a physical disorder, physical injury, or physical 

10 illness that would place the woman in danger of 

11 death unless an abortion is performed, including a 

12 life-threatening physical condition caused by or aris13 ing from the pregnancy itself. 

14 (c) HOSPITALS.—Subsection (a) does not apply with 

15 respect to a hospital, so long as such hospital does not, 

16 during the period for which funds described in subsection 

17 (a) are provided to such hospital, provide funds to any 

18 non-hospital entity that performs an abortion (other than 

19 an abortion described in subsection (b)). 

20 (d) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

21 (1) The term ‘‘entity’’ means the entire legal 

22 entity, including any entity that controls, is con23 trolled by, or is under common control with such en24 tity. 


smartinez on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 853 IH

1 (2) The term ‘‘hospital’’ has the meaning given 

2 to such term in section 1861(e) of the Social Secu3 rity Act (42 U.S.C. 1395x(e)). 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
1 In The



### Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

____________________

NO

. 09

- 1 3

- 00 101

- C R



### ____________________

EX PARTE DANIEL ARCENEAUX

________________________________________ _______________ ______________

On A ppeal from the 35 9th District Court

Montgomery County, Texas

Trial Cause No

. 12

- 09

- 10077

- CR

________________________________________ ________________ _____________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Daniel Arceneaux appealed an order denying his application for a writ of

habeas corpus for a reduction of a pre

- trial bond. Counsel for the appellant

subsequently notified the Court that the underlying criminal case has been resolved

through a plea bargain agreement. Issues concerning pre

- trial bail are moot when

the accused is no longer subject to pre

- trial confinement. See Martinez v. State

,

826 S.W.2d 620, 620 (Tex. Crim. App. 1992); Bennet v. State , 818 S.W. 2 d 199

,2

200 (Tex. App.

— Houston [ 14th Dist.] 1991

, no pet.). The appeal is dismissed as

moot.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

________________________________ CHARLES KREGER

Justice

Opinion Delivered April 24 , 2013

Do Not Publish

Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Horton, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 376 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 376

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                         July 25, 2005.
Whereas the video game ``Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas'' was given a rating of 
        ``Mature'' by the Entertainment Software Ratings Board;
Whereas the game contains sexually explicit content that is accessible by 
        consumers but that appears to have been hidden from the ratings board in 
        order to avoid the game receiving an ``Adults Only'' rating;
Whereas the Entertainment Software Ratings Board took swift action in 
        investigating the matter and revoked the ``Mature'' rating, ensuring any 
        future sales of ``Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas'' will be under an 
        ``Adults Only'' rating; and
Whereas the publisher of the video game, Rockstar Games, may have intentionally 
        deceived the ratings board and consumers: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives that--
            (1) the Federal Trade Commission should investigate the publication 
        of the video game ``Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas'' to determine if the 
        publisher, Rockstar Games, intentionally deceived the Entertainment 
        Software Ratings Board to avoid an ``Adults-Only'' rating; and
            (2) if the Commission determines Rockstar Games to have committed 
        such deception or fraud, the Commission should apply the toughest of 
        penalties.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
PUBLIC LAW 109–405—DEC. 18, 2006 120 STAT. 2757

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 5989:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 152 (2006):

Sept. 28, considered and passed House.

Dec. 6, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 109–405

109th Congress

An Act

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 10240

Roosevelt Road in Westchester, Illinois, as the ‘‘John J. Sinde Post Office Building’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. JOHN J. SINDE POST OFFICE BUILDING.

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal

Service located at 10240 Roosevelt Road in Westchester, Illinois,

shall be known and designated as the ‘‘John J. Sinde Post Office

Building’’.

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation,

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference

to the ‘‘John J. Sinde Post Office Building’’.

Approved December 18, 2006.

Dec. 18, 2006

[H.R. 5989]
### Page 1 of 3 **Disposition Comments Docket No:**  

### FAA - 2011 - 0454 These comments are in **Directorate ID:** 

### 2009 - SW - 54 - AD response to an SNPRM Originating Office Tracking No.: **Next Step:** FRAN SNPRM 

### N o C omments/Only

Supportive Comments Received

– If this box is checked, no signatures are required. 

### Has the reference d service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? I f ye s, list latest revision and attach a cop y. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance. Instructions: Summarize all comments **by issue** (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue. **All comments relating to the sam e issue should be discussed together.**  Do not list all of the issues from one commenter togeth er. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA - IR- M - 8040.1C Chapter 9. **ISSUE 1:** Select one o

f the following : If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because **ISSUE 2**  **:** Select one of the following :

If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree w ith because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD:

### Page 2 of 3

If **NO** , we don’t agree because **For additional issues, do uble**  **- click**  **here**

### Page 3 of 3 **S ignature Section**  Signature indicates concurrence with this action. Originating Office Tracking No.: **ASE** Printed Name **: Date** 

**Branch Ma nager**  **Date**
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 534 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 534

  Recognizing the importance and credibility of an independent Iraqi 
        judiciary in the formation of a new and democratic Iraq.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            November 4, 2005

Mr. Burgess (for himself, Mr. King of Iowa, Mr. Akin, Mr. Boustany, Mr. 
  Burton of Indiana, Mr. Cantor, Mr. Carter, Mr. Chocola, Mr. Cole of 
   Oklahoma, Mr. Conaway, Mr. Cuellar, Mr. Culberson, Mr. Issa, Mr. 
Feeney, Mr. Franks of Arizona, Mr. Gallegly, Mr. Gingrey, Mr. Al Green 
of Texas, Mr. Gene Green of Texas, Mr. Jindal, Mr. Daniel E. Lungren of 
   California, Mrs. Musgrave, Mr. Pitts, Mr. Ryan of Wisconsin, Mr. 
Saxton, Mr. Sessions, Mr. Shadegg, Mr. Westmoreland, and Mr. Wilson of 
South Carolina) submitted the following resolution; which was referred 
              to the Committee on International Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Recognizing the importance and credibility of an independent Iraqi 
        judiciary in the formation of a new and democratic Iraq.

Whereas the United States is supportive of a sovereign governing body in Iraq, 
        including the current government as well as future duly elected 
        governments and appointed officials;
Whereas Iraq, as do all sovereign nations, has the duty and responsibility to 
        indict, prosecute, and punish criminals within its jurisdiction;
Whereas the Iraqi Special Tribunal holds the sovereign power to prosecute 
        criminals;
Whereas certain accused individuals have allegedly committed egregious crimes 
        against humanity, genocide, and war crimes;
Whereas the people of a free and democratic Iraq deserve justice for the 
        horrific crimes inflicted upon them; and
Whereas the Iraqi Special Tribunal is empaneled to bring swift and impartial 
        justice for the people, victims, and the nation of Iraq: Now, therefore, 
        be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives fully supports an 
independent Iraqi judiciary and its efforts to serve the cause of 
justice in a free and democratic Iraq.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 543 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 543

Congratulating Northeastern Illinois University on the sesquicentennial 
                           of the University.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 27, 2017

 Mr. Quigley submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
              the Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Congratulating Northeastern Illinois University on the sesquicentennial 
                           of the University.

Whereas Northeastern Illinois University has served the Chicagoland area and 
        beyond for 150 years, having graduated nearly 80,000 students who have--

    (1) strengthened the local workforce;

    (2) made a positive difference in their communities; and

    (3) transformed the lives of others, just as the University has done 
for those students;

Whereas Northeastern Illinois University is regarded as the most diverse 
        regional university in the Midwest and is designated by the Department 
        of Education as a Hispanic-Serving Institution;
Whereas Northeastern Illinois University is known for--

    (1) having the safest campus in the State of Illinois;

    (2) being among the best institutions in the United States for adult 
learners; and

    (3) the fact that graduates of the University have the ninth-lowest 
amount of student loan debt among graduates of 4-year colleges and 
universities in the United States; and

Whereas Northeastern Illinois University offers more than 80 undergraduate and 
        graduate programs in the arts, sciences, education, and business at 5 
        locations in the Chicago metropolitan area, including in the North Park 
        and Bronzeville neighborhoods: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) congratulates Northeastern Illinois University on the 
        sesquicentennial of the University; and
            (2) extends best wishes to the University for continued 
        success and achievement.
                                 <all>
```
PGI 243.204 Administration.

(1) Whenever practicable, the contracting officer should provide advance notice of a proposed

change order to the administrative contracting officer (ACO).

(i) The ACO shall review the proposed change order to ensure compatibility with the status of

performance.

(ii) If the contractor has progressed beyond the effective point specified in the proposed change

order, the ACO shall determine the earliest practical point at which the change order could be made

effective and shall advise the contracting officer.

(2) If a change order has been issued and the effective date has been determined to be

impracticable, the contracting officer shall—

(i) Issue another change order to correct, revise, or supersede the first change order; then

(ii) Definitize by supplemental agreement citing both change orders.

PGI 243.204-71 Certification of requests for equitable adjustment.

Parent topic: PGI 243.2 -CHANGE ORDERS
2007-1699.

#### State ex rel. Macfarlane v. Tanner.

In Mandamus and Prohibition. On motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss granted. Cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.
§ 62.8 Information collection requirements: OMB approval. ( a ) The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has submitted the information collection requirements contained in this part to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for approval as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 *et seq.*). The NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. OMB has approved the information collection requirements contained in this part under control number 3150-0143.
( b ) The approved information collection requirements contained in this part appear in §§ 62.5, 62.11, 62.12, 62.13, 62.14, and 62.15.
[54 FR 5420, Feb. 3, 1989, as amended at 62 FR 52188, Oct. 6, 1997; 85 FR 65663, Oct. 16, 2020]
#### Keela McGAHEY *v.*STATE of Arkansas

CR 07-891

262 S.W.3d 141

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Opinion delivered September 13, 2007

*Hubert W. Alexander,*for appellant.

No response.

Per Curiam.

Appellant, Keela McGahey, by and through her attorney, Hubert W. Alexander, has filed a motion for *526rule on clerk to file her record and have her appeal docketed. The clerk refused to accept the record. The record before us does not show strict compliance with Arkansas Rules of Appellate Procedure - Rule 5(b)(1)(C), as all parties have not had an opportunity to be heard on appellant’s motions to extend time for filing the transcript.

We have held that Rule 5(b)(1) applies to both civil and criminal cases for the determination of the timeliness of a record on appeal. *See Roy v. State,*367 Ark. 178, 238 S.W.3d 117 (2006) (per curiam). Rule 5(b)(1) provides in pertinent part:

> (1) If any party has designated stenographically reported material for inclusion in the record on appeal, the circuit court, by order entered before expiration of the period prescribed by subdivision (a) of this rule or a prior extension order, may extend the time for filing the record only if it makes the following findings:

> (C) All parties have had the opportunity to be heard on the motion, either at a hearing or by responding in writing;

*Id.*We have made it clear that there must be strict compliance with the requirements of Rule 5(b), and that we do not view the granting of an extension as a mere formality. *See White v. State,*366 Ark. 295, 234 S.W.3d 882 (2006); *Rackley v. State,*366 Ark. 232, 234 S.W.3d 314 (2006). As the record before us does not comply with this rule, we remand this case to the trial court for compliance with Rule 5(b)(1)(C).

Remanded.
§ 603.1270 Grant. A legal instrument which, consistent with 31 U.S.C. 6304, is used to enter into a relationship: ( a ) The principal purpose of which is to transfer a thing of value to the recipient to carry out a public purpose of support or stimulation authorized by a law of the United States, rather than to acquire property or services for the Department of Energy's direct benefit or use.
( b ) In which substantial involvement is not expected between the DOE and the recipient when carrying out the activity contemplated by the grant.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of AccuPoll Holding Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Craig A. Hewitt, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


November 10, 2004                           /s/ Craig A. Hewitt
                                            -----------------------------------
                                            Craig A. Hewitt
                                            Chief Financial Officer

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
Case 1:06-cv-00775-TFM Document 8 Filed 09/18/2006 Page 1 of 1