SIP SUBMITTAL COMPLETENESS CRITERIA CHECKLIST 

(In accordance with 40 CFR Part 51 - App. V) 

SIP Submitted by: VA Department of Environmental Quality 

Date Submitted: August 30, 2011 

Subject: Major Source Permits Revision All (PM2.5) 

Completeness Review 

Completed by: Gerallyn Duke 

Date Completed: November 29,2011 

Administrative Materials 

ACCEPTABLE 

EPA REQUIREMENT STATE SUBMITTAL I(X) 

1. A formal letter of submittal from the Governor or his 1.Letter from Virginia Department of Environmental Quality X 

~esignee, requesting EPA approval of the plan or revision dated 8/25/11 signed by David Paylor (designee) 

~ereof. 

~. Evidence that the State has adopted the plan in the State code 2.SIP package contains copy of V ADEQ regulations - Chapter X 

lor body of regulations; or issued the permit, order, or consent 10 of 9V AC5 Chapter 10 General Definitions, Article 8 of 

iagreement in final form. That evidence shall include the date 9V AC5 Chapter 80 Permits for Major Stationary Sources and 

Iof adoption or final issuance as well as the effective date of the Major Modifications Locating in Prevention of Significant 

IPlan, if different from the adoption/issuance date. Deterioration Areas, and Article 9 of 9V AC5 Chapter 80 

Check to see if the regulation, permit, order or consent decree Permits for Major Stationary Sources and Major Modifications 

Ihas a sunset or expiration date. If so it is not acceptable as a Locating in Nonattainment Areas 

SIP submission. Date of Adoption: 6/1 0/11 

Effective Date: 8/17/11 

No sunset or expiration date 

3. Evidence that the State has the necessary legal authority 3. Noted in Volume 27, Issue 23 of Virginia Register of X 

under State law to adopt and implement the plan. Regulations dated 7/18/11. Authority is § 10.1-1308 of the 

Code of Virginia 

4. A copy of actual regulation, or document submitted for 4. Copy of regulation showing changes and effective date is 
EPA REQUIREMENT STATE SUBMITTAL 100 

approval and incorporation by reference into the plan, including included in submittal X 

indication of the changes made to the existing approved plan, 

where applicable. The submittal shall be a copy of the official 

State regulation/document signed, stamped, dated by the 

appropriate State official indicating that it is fully enforceable 

by the State. The effective date of the regulation/document 

~hall, whenever possible, be indicated in the document itself. 

5. Evidence that the State followed all of the procedural 5. Certification of compliance with state administrative X 

equirements of the State's laws and constitution in conducting procedures is provided. Copy of public hearing notice and 

~d completing the adoption/issuance of the plan. certification of public participation activities are provided. 

~. Evidence that public notice was given ofthe proposed 6. Notice of public hearing and public comment period was X 

change consistent with procedures approved by EPA, including published in the Virginia Register of Regulations on July 18, 

the date of publication of such notice. 2011. 

'r]. Certification that public hearings were held in accordance 7. Certification of Public Participation Activities states that the X 

~th the information provided in the public notice and the public notice included procedures to afford the public the 

State's laws and constitution, if applicable. opportunity to request that a hearing be held and that no such 

request was received. 

8. Compilation of public comments and the State's response 8. Public Participation Record is provided and states that the X 

Ithereto. state did not receive testimony on this revision. 

Technical Materials 

1. Identification of all regulated pollutants affected by the plan. 1. Regulations regarding particulate matter less than 2.5 X 

micrometers (PM2.5) as regulated new source review (NSR) 

pollutants 

~. Identification of the locations of affected sources including 2.Major Stationary Sources and Major Modifications Locating 

Ithe EPA attainmentlnonattainment designation of the locations in Prevention of Significant Deterioration Areas and in X 

~d the status of the attainment plan for the affected area(s). Nonattainment Areas 

~. Quantification of the changes in plan allowable emissions 3.N/A X 

!from the affected sources; estimates of changes in current 

~ctual emissions from affected sources or, where appropriate, 

quantification of changes in actual emissions from affected 

sources through calculations of the differences between certain 
EPA REQUIREMENT STATE SUBMITTAL· i(X) 

baseline levels and allowable emissions anticipated as a result 

of the revision. 

4. The State's demonstration that the national ambient air 4. The revised SIP should be the same as or equivalent to the X 

quality standards, prevention of significant deterioration revised federal NSR and PSD permitting programs which, 

. ncrements, reasonable further progress demonstration, and among other things, are intended to protect the NAAQS for 

visibility, as applicable, are protected if the plan is approved PM2.S and the increment for PM2.S. The regulations will 

and implemented. enhance the current approved program in Virginia. 

S. Modeling information required to support the proposed S.N/A X 

evision, including input data, output data, models used, 

ambient monitoring data used, meteorological data used, 

ustification for use of offsite data (where used), modes of 

models used, assumptions, and other information relevant to 

the determination of adequacy of the modeling analysis. 

6. Evidence, where necessary, that emission limitations are 6.N/A X 

based on continuous emission reduction technology. 

7. Evidence that the plan contains emission limitations, work 7.N/A X 

practice standards and recordkeeping/reporting requirements, 

where necessary, to ensure emission levels. 

8. Compliance/enforcement strategies, including how 8.N/A X 

compliance will be determined in practice. 

9. Special economic and technological justifications required 9. No economic impact is seen and this addition will bring VA X 

by any applicable EPA policies. (If a policy is not appropriate, DEQ regulations to be consistent with the Federal program. 

explain why.) This will also fulfill a needed in the program which was 

represented in a Federal Register notice dated May 16,2008-

73 FR28321 

10. A Section 107 request must be accompanied by a 10. N/A X 

maintenance plan demonstrating maintenance to the relevant 

NAAQS for at least 10 years after redesignation.