alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 511 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 511

 Honoring and thanking United States Capitol Police Assistant Chief of 
     Police James Patrick Rohan on the occasion of his retirement.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 26, 2005

 Mr. Ney submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                   Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Honoring and thanking United States Capitol Police Assistant Chief of 
     Police James Patrick Rohan on the occasion of his retirement.

Whereas Assistant Chief of Police James Patrick Rohan was appointed as a United 
        States Capitol Police private in 1975;
Whereas Assistant Chief of Police Rohan, throughout his career, has 
        distinguished himself through countless commendations and recognition 
        for professionalism and extraordinary service for the United States 
        Capitol Police;
Whereas Assistant Chief of Police Rohan, through extraordinary efforts and 
        dedication during his outstanding career of over 30 years rose from the 
        rank of private to the position of Assistant Chief of Police, the second 
        in command of the United States Capitol Police; and
Whereas Assistant Chief of Police Rohan, throughout his tenure with the United 
        States Capitol Police, contributed immeasurably to the increased 
        professionalism of the force and has made a significant contribution to 
        enhancing the security of Congress: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives honors and thanks James 
Patrick Rohan and his family on the occasion of his retirement for a 
lifelong professional commitment of service to the United States 
Capitol Police and of ensuring the safety and security of Congress.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


The undersigned  hereby certify  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that the quarterly
report of United States Basketball League, Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly
period ended May 31, 2005 fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a)
or  15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934  and  that  the  information
contained  in such  quarterly  report  on Form  10-QSB  fairly  presents  in all
material  respects the  financial  condition  and results of operation of United
States Basketball League, Inc.

Date: July 27, 2005


/s/ Daniel T. Meisenheimer, III
-------------------------------
Daniel T. Meisenheimer, III
President

Date: July 27, 2005


/s/ Richard C. Meisenheimer
---------------------------
Richard C. Meisenheimer
Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 463 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 463

  Of inquiry directing the Secretary of Homeland Security to provide 
  certain information to the House of Representatives relating to the 
                 reapportionment of airport screeners.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 27, 2005

  Mr. Blumenauer (for himself, Mr. Holden, Ms. Hooley, Mr. Watt, Mr. 
 Cooper, Mr. DeFazio, Mr. Wu, Mr. Lewis of Georgia, Mr. Menendez, Mr. 
 Ford, Mr. Snyder, Mr. Grijalva, Mr. Pastor, and Mr. Terry) submitted 
   the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 
                           Homeland Security

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Of inquiry directing the Secretary of Homeland Security to provide 
  certain information to the House of Representatives relating to the 
                 reapportionment of airport screeners.

    Resolved, That the Secretary of Homeland Security is directed to 
furnish the House of Representatives, not later than 14 days after the 
date of the adoption of this resolution, all documents and records in 
his possession relating to the review of the screener allocation model 
of the Transportation Security Administration and the subsequent 
reapportionment of airport screeners employed by the Transportation 
Security Administration which was announced on or around July 26, 2005.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 189 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 189

 Recognizing the historic, cultural, and religious significance of the 
             festival of Vaisakhi, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 10, 2017

Mr. Garamendi (for himself, Mr. Meehan, Ms. Judy Chu of California, and 
Mr. Valadao) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
            the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Recognizing the historic, cultural, and religious significance of the 
             festival of Vaisakhi, and for other purposes.

Whereas Vaisakhi has been celebrated in the Punjab region of South Asia for 
        centuries and today is also celebrated in communities throughout India, 
        in the United States, and around the world;
Whereas Vaisakhi is an annual festival celebrating the spring harvest season;
Whereas Vaisakhi is of particular significance to the Sikh religion and is one 
        of the most important dates in Sikh history;
Whereas, for Sikhs, Vaisakhi commemorates the creation of the Khalsa, a 
        fellowship of devout Sikhs, by Guru Gobind Singh in 1699; and
Whereas Vaisakhi celebrates community, prosperity, and continued progress in the 
        year ahead: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) recognizes the historic, cultural, and religious 
        significance of the festival of Vaisakhi;
            (2) recognizes the significance of Vaisakhi to Sikh 
        communities in the United States and around the world; and
            (3) expresses its respect for all communities that 
        celebrate Vaisakhi.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 606 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 606

Congratulating the University of Maryland Terrapins men's soccer team, 
      the 2005 National Collegiate Athletic Association Champions.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 14, 2005

  Mr. Hoyer (for himself, Mr. Cardin, Mr. Gilchrest, Mr. Bartlett of 
   Maryland, Mr. Wynn, Mr. Cummings, Mr. Ruppersberger, and Mr. Van 
 Hollen) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Congratulating the University of Maryland Terrapins men's soccer team, 
      the 2005 National Collegiate Athletic Association Champions.

Whereas the Maryland Terrapins claimed the 2005 NCAA Championship, 1-0, over the 
        University of New Mexico Lobos at SAS Complex in Cary, North Carolina, 
        on December 11, 2005;
Whereas the Maryland Terrapins are the 2005 Atlantic Coast Conference Regular 
        Season Champions;
Whereas the Maryland Terrapins, in their 2005 season, had an overall record of 
        19-4-2, and set a school record of 66 goals;
Whereas the Maryland Terrapins have amassed 76 wins over the past four seasons, 
        the most in the NCAA during the four-year span;
Whereas the Maryland Terrapins won their first national soccer title in 1968, 
        when it shared the title with Michigan State;
Whereas the Maryland Terrapins are the first team since 1992 to win the 
        tournament as the number one seed;
Whereas Jason Garey was named the tournament's offensive Most Valuable Player 
        and Chris Seitz was named the defensive Most Valuable Player; and
Whereas the 2005 NCAA Championship Soccer team members are Spencer Allen, Matt 
        Beckman, Kenney Bertz, Marc Burch, Robbie C'deBaca, Kwame Darko, A.J. 
        Delagarza, Michael Dello-Russo, Maurice Edu, Jason Garey, David 
        Glaudemans, A.J. Godbolt, Aki Kadotani, Stephen King, Chris Lancos, 
        Michael Marchiano, Kevin Reiman, Doug Rodkey, Robbie Rogers, Craig 
        Salvati, Chris Seitz, Kevin Tangney, Michael Vallie, Pat Wilson, and 
        Graham Zusi: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives congratulates the 
University of Maryland Terrapins men's soccer team and Coaches Sasho 
Cirovsky, Russell Payne, and Rob Vartughian on an outstanding 
championship season, a season that sets the Terrapins among the elite 
in collegiate soccer.
                                 <all>
```
#### City of East Liverpool, Appellant, *v.*Columbiana County Budget Commission et al., Appellees.

[Cite as *E. Liverpool v. Columbiana Cty. Budget Comm.,*116 Ohio St.3d 1201, 2007-Ohio-5505.]

(No. 2006-1129

Submitted September 18, 2007

Decided October 23, 2007.)

{¶ 1} This cause is before the court upon appellant East Liverpool’s motion for reconsideration of our decision reported at 114 Ohio St.3d 133, 2007-Ohio-3759, 870 N.E.2d 705. East Liverpool contends that the court failed to address the equal protection argument that it had advanced through the first assignment of error in its notice of appeal. That contention is incorrect. The court’s opinion directly addresses and rejects East Liverpool’s argument that R.C. 5747.53(C) and 5747.63(C) are facially unconstitutional on account of the different treatment of East Liverpool citizens with respect to “representation in the legislative vote of political subdivisions to approve a new alternative formula.”

{¶2} In rejecting this contention, we held that the distinction between the largest city and the other subdivisions is rational in light of the operation of the statutes as a whole because, absent an exclusion under division (C), the statutes require that the largest city approve an alternative method of apportionment— thereby conferring a super-vote, or “veto” vote, upon the largest city. In ¶ 29 of our opinion, we pointed out that the exclusion of the largest city’s vote must occur annually, which means that with each new year, East Liverpool starts out with a veto vote and is thereby enabled to protect its interests.

{¶ 3} Additionally, we note that the motion for reconsideration apparently raises an entirely new argument. East Liverpool asserts that “[wjhile the General Assembly can make rational distinctions between political subdivisions concerning the degree of legislative representation (the weight of the vote), it cannot completely eliminate a targeted group of citizens’ legislative representation in an effort to achieve consensus.” In its briefs, East Liverpool argued that the distinction between the largest city and other subdivisions lacked a rational basis; now East Liverpool appears to argue that a rational basis is not sufficient because the measure at issue is an exclusion, rather than one that merely gives a different weight to a particular subdivision’s vote. East Liverpool never pressed this argument in its briefs, and under our precedent it is therefore “deemed to be *1202abandoned.” *Household Fin. Corp. v. Porterfield*(1970), 24 Ohio St.2d 39, 46, 53 O.O.2d 22, 263 N.E.2d 243.

John R. Varanese, for appellant.

{¶ 4} The motion for reconsideration is denied.

Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.

Moyer, C.J., dissents.
Editorial Note on Part 30
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 30 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

§ 30.22 Certain industrial devices. ( a ) Except for persons who manufacture, process, produce, or initially transfer for sale or distribution industrial devices containing byproduct material designed and manufactured for the purpose of detecting, measuring, gauging or controlling thickness, density, level, interface location, radiation, leakage, or qualitative or quantitative chemical composition, or for producing an ionized atmosphere, any person is exempt from the requirements for a license set forth in section 81 of the Act and from the regulations in parts 19, 20, 21, 30 through 36, and 39 of this chapter to the extent that such person receives, possesses, uses, transfers, owns, or acquires byproduct material, in these certain detecting, measuring, gauging, or controlling devices and certain devices for producing an ionized atmosphere, and manufactured, processed, produced, or initially transferred in accordance with a specific license issued under § 32.30 of this chapter, which license authorizes the initial transfer of the device for use under this section. This exemption does not cover sources not incorporated into a device, such as calibration and reference sources.
( b ) Any person who desires to manufacture, process, produce, or initially transfer for sale or distribution industrial devices containing byproduct material for use under paragraph (a) of this section, should apply for a license under § 32.30 of this chapter and for a certificate of registration in accordance with § 32.210 of this chapter.
[77 FR 43689, July 25, 2012]
#### § 603.600 Administrative matters.

This subpart addresses “systemic” administrative matters that place requirements on the operation of a participant's financial management, property management, or purchasing system. Each participant's systems are organization-wide and do not vary with each agreement. Therefore, a TIA should address systemic requirements in a uniform way for each type of participant organization.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 534 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 534

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                     December 16, 2005.
Whereas the United States is supportive of a sovereign governing body in Iraq, 
        including the current government as well as future duly elected 
        governments and appointed officials;
Whereas Iraq, as do all sovereign nations, has the duty and responsibility to 
        indict, prosecute, and punish criminals within its jurisdiction;
Whereas the Iraqi Special Tribunal holds the sovereign power to prosecute 
        criminals;
Whereas certain accused individuals have allegedly committed egregious crimes 
        against humanity, genocide, and war crimes;
Whereas the people of a free and democratic Iraq deserve justice for the 
        horrific crimes inflicted upon them; and
Whereas the Iraqi Special Tribunal is empaneled to bring swift and impartial 
        justice for the people, victims, and the nation of Iraq: Now, therefore, 
        be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives fully supports an independent 
Iraqi judiciary and its efforts to serve the cause of justice in a free and 
democratic Iraq.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
#### MOSAKOWSKI, Respondent, v. UTICA KNITTING CO., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

December 4, 1914.)

Action by Leo Mosakowski, an infant, etc., against the Utica Knitting Company.

No Opinion. Judgment and 'order affirmed, with costs.
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-16-0000410 27-JAN-2020 07:46 AM
Editorial Note on Part 63
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 63 appear at 81 FR 86909, Dec. 2, 2016.

§ 63.72 Construction records. ( a ) DOE shall maintain records of construction of the geologic repository operations area at the Yucca Mountain site in a manner that ensures their usability for future generations in accordance with § 63.51(a)(3).
( b ) The records required under paragraph (a) of this section must include at least the following— ( 1 ) Surveys of the underground facility excavations, shafts, ramps, and boreholes referenced to readily identifiable surface features or monuments;
( 2 ) A description of the materials encountered;
( 3 ) Geologic maps and geologic cross-sections;
( 4 ) Locations and amount of seepage;
( 5 ) Details of equipment, methods, progress, and sequence of work;
( 6 ) Construction problems;
( 7 ) Anomalous conditions encountered;
( 8 ) Instrument locations, readings, and analysis;
( 9 ) Location and description of structural support systems;
( 10 ) Location and description of dewatering systems;
( 11 ) Details, methods of emplacement, and location of seals used; and
( 12 ) Facility design records (e.g, design specifications and “as built” drawings).
H. Res. 580

In the House of Representatives, U.S., 

December 6, 2005.

Resolved, That Karen L. Haas of the State of Maryland, 

be, and is hereby, chosen Clerk of the House of Representatives. 

Attest:

Clerk.
BOARD COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENT


         


        
            	
                        Annual Retainer Fee

                    	
                        $ 40,000.00

                    


        


         


        
            	
                        Committee Chair Annual Fee

                    	
                        $ 7,500.00

                    


        


         


        
            	
                        Audit Committee Chair Annual Fee 

                    	
                        $ 10,000.00

                    


        


         


        
            	
                        Lead Director Annual Fee 

                    	
                        $ 10,000.00

                    


        


        (No reduction for other Chairman fees)


         


        
            	
                        In-Person Board/Committee Meeting Attendance Fee 

                    	
                        $ 

                    	
                        1,500.00

                    


        


         


        
            	
                        Telephone Board/Committee Meeting Attendance Fee 

                    	
                        $ 

                    	
                        1,000.00

                    


        


         


        
            	
                        Equity Incentive Grants

                    	
                        As determined periodically by

                    


        


        
            	
                         

                    	
                        the Board of Directors.

                    


        


        
            	
                         

                    	
                        Currently, annual

                    


        


        
            	
                         

                    	
                        grants with a value of $115,000,

                    


        


        
            	
                         

                    	
                        allocated 70% options and 30%

                    


        


        
            	
                         

                    	
                        RSUs
§ 436.30 Purpose and scope. ( a ) *General.* This subpart provides procedures and methods which apply to Federal agencies with regard to the award and administration of energy savings performance contracts. This subpart applies in addition to the Federal Acquisition Regulation at Title 48 of the CFR and related Federal agency regulations. The provisions of this subpart are controlling with regard to energy savings performance contracts notwithstanding any conflicting provisions of the Federal Acquisition Regulation and related Federal agency regulations.
( b ) *Utility incentive programs.* Nothing in this subpart shall preclude a Federal agency from— ( 1 ) Participating in programs to increase energy efficiency, conserve water, or manage electricity demand conducted by gas, water, or electric utilities and generally available to customers of such utilities;
( 2 ) Accepting financial incentives, goods, or services generally available from any such utility to increase energy efficiency or to conserve water or manage electricity demand; or
( 3 ) Entering into negotiations with electric, water, and gas utilities to design cost-effective demand management and conservation incentive programs to address the unique needs of each Federal agency.
( c ) *Promoting competition.* To the extent allowed by law, Federal agencies should encourage utilities to select contractors for the conduct of utility incentive programs in a competitive manner to the maximum extent practicable.
( d ) *Interpretations.* The permissive provisions of this subpart shall be liberally construed to effectuate the objectives of Title VIII of the National Energy Conservation Policy Act, 42 U.S.C. 8287-8287c.
[60 FR 18334, Apr. 10, 1995, as amended at 60 FR 19343, Apr. 18, 1995; 65 FR 39786, June 28, 2000; 89 FR 19501, Mar. 19, 2024]