alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
4.2202 Prohibition.

(a) Section 102 of Division R of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2023 (Pub. L. 117-328), the No

TikTok on Government Devices Act, and its implementing guidance under Office of Management and

Budget (OMB) Memorandum M-23-13, dated February 27, 2023, “No TikTok on Government

Devices” Implementation Guidance, collectively prohibit the presence or use of a covered application

on information technology, including certain equipment used by Federal contractors.

(b) This prohibition applies to the presence or use of a covered application on any information

technology owned or managed by the Government, or on any information technology used or

provided by the contractor under a contract, including equipment provided by the contractor’s

employees, unless an exception is granted in accordance with OMB Memorandum M-23-13.

Parent topic: Subpart 4.22 Prohibition on a ByteDance Covered Application.
§ 60.132 Additional design criteria for surface facilities in the geologic repository operations area. ( a ) *Facilities for receipt and retrieval of waste.* Surface facilities in the geologic repository operations area shall be designed to allow safe handling and storage of wastes at the geologic repository operations area, whether these wastes are on the surface before emplacement or as a result of retrieval from the underground facility.
( b ) *Surface facility ventilation.* Surface facility ventilation systems supporting waste transfer, inspection, decontamination, processing, or packaging shall be designed to provide protection against radiation exposures and offsite releases as provided in § 60.111(a).
( c ) *Radiation control and monitoring* — ( 1 ) *Effluent control.* The surface facilities shall be designed to control the release of radioactive materials in effluents during Category 1 design basis events so as to meet the performance objectives of § 60.111(a).
( 2 ) *Effluent monitoring.* The effluent monitoring systems shall be designed to measure the amount and concentration of radionuclides in any effluent with sufficient precision to determine whether releases conform to the design requirement for effluent control. The monitoring systems shall be designed to include alarms that can be periodically tested.
( d ) *Waste treatment.* Radioactive waste treatment facilities shall be designed to process any radioactive wastes generated at the geologic repository operations area into a form suitable to permit safe disposal at the geologic repository operations area or to permit safe transportation and conversion to a form suitable for disposal at an alternative site in accordance with any regulations that are applicable.
( e ) *Consideration of decommissioning.* The surface facility shall be designed to facilitate decontamination or dismantlement to the same extent as would be required, under other parts of this chapter, with respect to equivalent activities licensed thereunder.
[48 FR 28222, June 21, 1983, as amended at 61 FR 64270, Dec. 4, 1996]
#### In the Matter of James Huff, Petitioner, v Robert P. Kennedy, as Justice of the Supreme Court, et al., Respondents.

Application unanimously denied and petition dismissed, without costs. Memorandum: The doctrine of collateral estoppel does not preclude prosecution in this case (see *People v Berkowitz,*50 NY2d 333). The question presented by the denial of the free transcript may not be raised in a CPLR article 78 proceeding brought in this court. (Art 78.) Present — Hancock, Jr., J. P., Schnepp, Callahan, Doerr and Witmer, JJ.
229 So.2d 111

#### Jerry Monroe SELPH v. Honorable Earl E. VERON, Judge Fourteenth Judicial District Court, Parish of Calcasieu, et al.

No. 50270.

Dec. 17, 1969.

In re: Jerry Monroe Selph applying for writ of mandamus and habeas corpus.

Writ refused. The showing made does not warrant the exercise of our supervisory jurisdiction.

BARHAM, J.,

concurs. While I do not agree with the holding of the United States Supreme Court in Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238, 89 S.Ct. 1709, 23 L.Ed.2d 274 (June, 1969), it is not only apposite but fits the instant case like a glove. That ruling, however, was not made retroactive, and I believe we should give it prospective effect only. I concur in order that the trial courts may he alerted to the possible effect of that case upon receiving guilty pleas with or without benefit of counsel.
PGI 217.7103-5 Repair costs not readily ascertainable.       If the nature of any repairs is such that their extent and probable cost cannot be ascertained readily, the solicitation should—          (1) Solicit offers for determining the nature and extent of the repairs;          (2) Provide that upon determination by the contracting officer of what work is necessary, the contractor, if requested by the contracting officer, shall negotiate prices for performance of the repairs; and          (3) Provide that prices for the repairs, if ordered, will be set forth in a modification of the job order.    **Parent topic:** PGI 217.7103 Master agreements and job orders.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ALFREDO GARCIA,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.
CORIZON HEALTH, INC.,

Defendant

- Appellee,

and

DONNA MENDOZA; et al.,

Defendants. No. 19

- 15271

D.C. No. 2:16

- cv

- 04569

- DJH

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Diane J. Humetewa, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 5, 2020 * *

Before: SCHROEDER, HAWKINS, and LEE, Circuit Judges.

Arizona state prisoner Alfredo Garcia appeals pro se from the district court’s

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

AUG 11 2020

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 19

- 15271

summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging deliberate indifference

to his serious dental needs

. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We

review de novo

. Toguchi v. Chung , 391 F.3d 1051, 1056 (9th Cir. 2004)

. We

affirm.

The district court properly granted summary judgment for defendant Corizon

Health, Inc. (“Corizon”) because Garcia failed to raise a genuine dispute of

material fact as to whether Corizon’s policy or custom caused him to suffer a

constitutional injury. See Tsao v. Desert Palace, Inc. , 698 F.3d 1128, 1139 (9th

Cir. 2012) (a private entity is liable under § 1983 only if the entity acted under

color of state law and the constitutional violation was caused by the entity’s

official policy or custom) ; Toguchi , 391 F.3d at 1060

- 61 ( a prison official acts with

deliberate indifference only if he or she knows of and disr egards a risk to the

prisoner’s health; medical malpractice, negligence or difference of opinion

concerning the course of treatment does not amount to deliberate indifference)

. The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying Garcia’s untimely

motion for leave to amend his complaint because Garcia did not demonstrate good

cause. See Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc. , 975 F.2d 604, 607

- 09 (9th Cir.

1992) ( setting forth the standard of review and explaining that a party seek ing

leave to amend the pleadings after the date specified in the scheduling order must
show diligence in seeking the amendment to satisfy the “good cause” standard )

.3 19

- 15271

We reject as unsupported by the record Garcia’s contention that the district

court failed to construe his pleadings liberally

. We do not consider arguments and allegations raised for the first time on

appeal. See Padgett v. Wright , 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).

Garcia’s request for judicial notice of district court case law (Docket Entry

No. 18) is denied as unnecessary.

AFFIRMED

.
IV 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 585 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 3861) to amend title XVIII 

of the Social Security Act to provide extended and additional protection 

to Medicare beneficiaries who enroll for the Medicare prescription drug 

benefit during 2006. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 6, 2005 

Ms. HERSETH submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Rules 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 3861) to amend 

title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide extended 

and additional protection to Medicare beneficiaries who 

enroll for the Medicare prescription drug benefit during 

2006. 

1 Resolved, That immediately upon adoption of this res2 olution the House shall without intervention of any point 

3 of order consider in the House the bill (H.R. 3861) to 

4 amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide 

5 extended and additional protection to Medicare bene6 ficiaries who enroll for the Medicare prescription drug 

7 benefit during 2006. The bill shall be considered as read. 
2 

HRES 585 IH 

1 The previous question shall be considered as ordered on 

2 the bill to final passage without intervening motion except: 

3 (1) one hour of debate on the bill equally divided and con4 trolled by the chairman and ranking minority member of 

5 the Committee on Energy and Commerce; and (2) one mo6 tion to recommit. 

Æ
2007-1821.

#### Louden v. A.W. Chesterton Co.

Cuyahoga App. No. 90185.

Pfeifer and Lanzinger, JJ., dissent.
Docket No: 

### FAA-2012-0885 Directorate ID: 

### 2012-NE-18 Disposition Comments
Originating Office Tracking No.: 

### SP3330EN-E Next Step:

# RAN 0 SNPRM 

## D These comments are in response to an SNPRM**~** 

### No Comments/Only Supportive Comments Received 

## -If this box is checked, no signatures are required. No 

### Has the referenced service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? Ifyes, list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of thepreviously publishedNPRM 

### will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focalpoint for guidance.
Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all ofthe issues from one commenter together. Ifchanges to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend
. Reference FAA-IR-M-8040.1C Chapter 9. ISSUE 1: 

### Select one of thefollowing : 

## If

other , explain: Commenter(s) : What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is itjustified? Do we agree? If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: IfPARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD : If

### NO, we don't agree because
ISSUE 2: 

### Select one of thefollowing: 

## If

other, explain: Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is itjustified? Do we agree? If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: IfPARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD: 

### Page I of3

### IfNO, we don't agree because

For additional 

### issues, double-click 

### here



### Page 2 of3Signature Section 

### Signature indicates concurrence with this action. Originating Office Tracking No.: 

### SP3330EN-E



### Printed Name: Frederick Zink 

# a**~** 

# (**~** 

# ( €/j "J 

# J - no 

# CoMN'O\\-s j 

# p '/(! Branch Manager t\

# \1'\\**~\** 1- Date



### Page 

### 3 of3
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q
FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         10,745,633
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               4,100,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    42,838,675
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         51,331,897
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           0
<LOANS>                                        226,293,855
<ALLOWANCE>                                    2,507,249
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 344,391,535
<DEPOSITS>                                     295,045,512
<SHORT-TERM>                                   10,964,301
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            3,841,444
<LONG-TERM>                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       9,130,378
<OTHER-SE>                                     25,409,900
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 344,391,535
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                15,308,904
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              4,266,330
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               162,063
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               19,737,297
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             8,331,823
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             8,664,304
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          11,072,993
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  330,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                8,138,007
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                4,971,341
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     4,971,341
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   3,448,850
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  .95
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .91
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                 4.62
<LOANS-NON>                                    606,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                   288,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                               0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               2,294,000
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  255,000
<RECOVERIES>                                   138,000
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              2,507,000
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           2,228,000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                            0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        279,000
        

</TABLE>
###### Editorial Note on Part 61

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 61 appear at 80 FR 74980, Dec. 1, 2015, and at 81 FR 86909, Dec. 2, 2016.

#### § 61.5 Interpretations.

Except as specifically authorized by the Commission in writing, no interpretation of the meaning of the regulations in this part by any officer or employee of the Commission other than a written interpretation by the General Counsel will be considered binding upon the Commission.
§ 455.133 Forwarding of applications from institutions and coordinating agencies for technical assistance and energy conservation measure grants. ( a ) Except as provided by § 455.92 of this part, each State shall forward all applications recommended for funding within its allocation to DOE once each program cycle along with a listing of buildings or measures covered by eligible applications for schools, hospitals, units of local government, and public care institutions ranked by the State if necessary pursuant to the provisions of § 455.131. If ranking has been employed, the list shall include the standings of buildings or measures. ( 1 ) Measure-by-measure rankings will be recombined for the respective buildings with more than one recommended measure and
( 2 ) Buildings will be consolidated under one grantee application.
( b ) The State shall indicate the amount of financial assistance requested by the applicant for each eligible building and, for those buildings recommended for funding within the limits of the State's allocation, the amount recommended for funding. If the amount recommended is less than the amount requested by the applicant, the list shall also indicate the reason for that recommendation.
( c ) The State shall indicate that it has reviewed and evaluated all of the submitted applications and that those applications meet the relevant requirements of the program, and shall certify that applications submitted are eligible pursuant to § 455.130(a).
Reference

U. S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Bureau of Standards NBS Special Publication 365 00 —

Washington, D. C. 20234 Reviaed November 1972 —

METRIC CONVERSION CARD —

Approximate Conversions

to Metric Measures

Symbol When You Know .Multiply b\ To Find Symbol LENGTH

in inches centimeters cm

ft feet 30 centimeters cm

yd yards 0.9 meters m

mi miles 1.6 kilometers km AREA

in

2 square inches 6.5 square centimeters cm2

ft

3 square feet 0.09 square meters m

a yd2 square yards 0.8 square meters m

J mia square miles 2.6 square kilometers km2 acres 0.4 hectares ha MASS (weight)

oz ounces 28 grams g

lb pounds 0.45 kilograms kg

short tons 0.9 tonnes t (2000 lb) VOLUME

tsp teaspoons 5 milliliters ml 55s Tbsp tablespoons 15 milliliters ml

floz fluid ounces 30 milliliters ml

c cups 0.24 liters 1 Pt pints 0.47 liters 1 qt quarts 0.95 liters 1 gal gallons 3.8 liters 1

ft" cubic feet 0.03 cubic meters m

8 yd" cubic yards 0.76 cubic meters m

8 TEMPERATURE (exact) °F Fahrenheit 5/9 (after Celsius °C

temperature subtracting temperature 1 -

1 —

32) •a —

32 9B.S »>• eie 6—

"T-w-1 0 | 40

20

'

l 40

i2o ieo

i 2 ?°

| -40 -20 0i

1

1

1

i

1 1 1 60 00 100

°c

100
Approximate Conversions from Metric Measures Symbo When You Know Multiply b> To Find Symbol LENGTH mm millimeters 0.04 inches cm centimeters 0.4 inches in meters 3.3 feet ft m meters Li yards yd km kilometers 0.6 miles mi AREA

cm2 square centimeters 0.16 square inche? in3 m

2 square meters 1.2 square yards yd1 kma square kilometers 0.4 square miles mi2 ha hectares) 10,000 m') 2.5 acres MASS (weight) K grams 0.035 ounces 02 kg kilograms 2.2 pounds lb

t tonnes (1000 kg) 1.1 short tons VOLUME

ml milliliters 0.03 fluid ounces floz

1 liters 2.1 pints P<

1 liters 1.06 quarts qi

1 liters 0.26 gallons gal m' cubic meters 35 cubic feet ft' cubic meters 1.3 cubic yards yd' TEMPERATURE (exact) °C Celsius 9/5 (then Fahrenheit *F

temperature add 32) temperature

For sale by the Superintendent of Documents

U.S. Printing Office. Washington, D.C. 20402

Stock Number 0303-01068 Catalog No. C13.10:365/2

•1 in = 2.54 cm (exactly). For other exact conversion! and more detailed tables, see NBS Misc. Fubl. 286, Units

of Weights and Measures. SD Catalog No. 03.10:286.

fr GPO : 1 974 O - 559-898

Iff!
§ 600.237 Subgrants. ( a ) *States.* States shall follow state law and procedures when awarding and administering subgrants (whether on a cost reimbursement or fixed amount basis) of financial assistance to local and Indian tribal governments. States shall: ( 1 ) Ensure that every subgrant includes any clauses required by Federal statute and executive orders and their implementing regulations;
( 2 ) Ensure that subgrantees are aware of requirements imposed upon them by Federal statute and regulation;
( 3 ) Ensure that a provision for compliance with § 600.242 is placed in every cost reimbursement subgrant; and
( 4 ) Conform any advances of grant funds to subgrantees substantially to the same standards of timing and amount that apply to cash advances by Federal agencies.
( b ) *All other grantees.* All other grantees shall follow the provisions of this subpart which are applicable to awarding agencies when awarding and administering subgrants (whether on a cost reimbursement or fixed amount basis) of financial assistance to local and Indian tribal governments. Grantees shall: ( 1 ) Ensure that every subgrant includes a provision for compliance with this subpart;
( 2 ) Ensure that every subgrant includes any clauses required by Federal statute and executive orders and their implementing regulations; and
( 3 ) Ensure that subgrantees are aware of requirements imposed upon them by Federal statutes and regulations.
( c ) *Exceptions.* By their own terms, certain provisions of this subpart do not apply to the award and administration of subgrants: ( 1 ) Section 600.210;
( 2 ) Section 600.211;
( 3 ) The letter-of-credit procedures specified in Treasury Regulations at 31 CFR part 205, cited in § 600.221; and
( 4 ) Section 600.250.
[53 FR 8045, 8087, Mar. 11, 1988. Redesignated at 59 FR 53264, Oct. 21, 1994, as amended at 61 FR 7166, Feb. 26, 1996] Reports, Records Retention, and Enforcement
§ 60.141 Confirmation of geotechnical and design parameters. ( a ) During repository construction and operation, a continuing program of surveillance, measurement, testing, and geologic mapping shall be conducted to ensure that geotechnical and design parameters are confirmed and to ensure that appropriate action is taken to inform the Commission of changes needed in design to accommodate actual field conditions encountered.
( b ) Subsurface conditions shall be monitored and evaluated against design assumptions.
( c ) As a minimum, measurements shall be made of rock deformations and displacement, changes in rock stress and strain, rate and location of water inflow into subsurface areas, changes in groundwater conditions, rock pore water pressures including those along fractures and joints, and the thermal and thermomechanical response of the rock mass as a result of development and operations of the geologic repository.
( d ) These measurements and observations shall be compared with the original design bases and assumptions. If significant differences exist between the measurements and observations and the original design bases and assumptions, the need for modifications to the design or in construction methods shall be determined and these differences and the recommended changes reported to the Commission.
( e ) In situ monitoring of the thermomechanical response of the underground facility shall be conducted until permanent closure to ensure that the performance of the natural and engineering features are within design limits.