alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Subpart 1213.70—Department of Transportation Procedures for Acquiring Training Services    **Parent topic:** PART 1213—SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION PROCEDURES1213.7000 Applicability.       (a) DOT policy at 1237.7000 applies to Standard Form (SF) 182, Request, Authorization, Agreement and Certification of Training, which may be used to acquire training services; however, the policy does not apply to training services acquired by Governmentwide commercial purchase card. The Governmentwide commercial purchase card may only be used to acquire training services valued at the micro-purchase threshold level or less.          (b) As reflected in 1237.7002, this policy does not apply to training attended by DOT employees that is scheduled and conducted by Government sources of supply, educational institutions, or private entities where DOT does not control or sponsor the training. Examples of when the policy does and does not apply include:          (1) When SF 182s are issued for three DOT employees to attend a one-week course at a university or other private entity, the policy does not apply. DOT does not control the course because the university or private entity has a contract in place with the training provider and DOT is placing an order under an existing contract; and          (2) When DOT awards a contract to a university or other private entity to provide training for DOT and/or other Government personnel, the policy applies. DOT controls this course; therefore, no soliciting or advertising of private non-Government training while conducting the contracted-for training is permitted.1213.7001 Solicitation provision and contract clause.       (a) Contracting officers shall insert the provision as prescribed at 1252.237–71, Certification of Data, in all solicitations and requests for quotations, and the clause as prescribed at 1252.237–72, Prohibition on Advertising, in solicitations, requests for quotations, and all contracts (*e.g.,* purchase orders, SF 182s) for training services when the content and/or presentation of the training is controlled by DOT.          (b) Contracting officers shall incorporate the successful offeror's certified data into any resultant contract(s). Certified data may be adopted by reference, if the contracting officer determines it contains information sufficient to reliably describe the certified data submitted. For example, this type of information includes dated material such as resumes and company or personnel qualifications.
1

Ton, Huan

From: Kasakevich, Jean (JC) [JCKasakevich@dow.com]

Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2013 4:07 PM

To: Burt, Stephanie (S)

Subject: FW: DOW CD for EPA Docket EPA-HQ-OPPT-2011-0182

As just discussed...

Thanks and regards, 

Jean Kasakevich  

Polyurethanes and Formulated Systems

From: Semeniuk, Michael [mailto:Semeniuk.Michael@epa.gov] 

Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2013 3:35 PM 

To: Kasakevich, Jean (JC) 

Subject: DOW CD for EPA Docket EPA-HQ-OPPT-2011-0182 

As we discussed in our conversation of 7/10/2013, we at the EPA Docket Center are unable to open and/or add the

following documents from your CD to the docket:

Folder: Adhesives/Technical Data Sheets

1. Mor‐Free L 75‐149 C‐132‐2 TDS.pdf

2. Mor‐Free L75‐164‐C‐411 Controlled Tear TDS.pdf

3. Mor‐Free L 75‐164 C‐78F TDS.pdf

4. Mor‐Free L 75‐164 BHT‐Modified C‐144 TDS.pdf

5. Mor‐Free L 75‐164 C132‐2 TDS.pdf

6. Robond PLA‐WB CR WB‐PLA TDS.pdf

Folder: Adhesives/Technology – Product Review/CURE/ADCOTE 76R36B w COREACTANT 9L7, Diisocyanate

Information, Virginia Department of Environmental Quality, sent 10‐11‐2012_files

1. filelist.xml

2. image001.gif

3. themedata.thmx

Please e‐mail replacement files to me and I will process them. Note that .xml, .gif and .thmx files cannot be posted to

regulations.gov. Thank you.

Michael Semeniuk

OCSPP & OSWER Docket Manager

EPA Docket Center, Operated by ASRC Primus

202‐566‐0219

semeniuk.michael@epa.gov

3337E EPA West, MC 28221T
#### § 60.23 Elimination of repetition.

In its application, environmental report, or Site Characterization Report, the DOE may incorporate by reference information contained in previous applications, statements, or reports filed with the Commission: *Provided,* That such references are clear and specific and that copies of the information so incorporated are available in the public document room located near the site of the proposed geologic repository.
#### § 590.207 Filing fees.

A non-refundable filing fee of fifty dollars ($50) shall accompany each application filed under § 590.201. Checks shall be made payable to “Treasury of the United States.”
#### CONWAY, Respondent, v. FARISH-STAFFORD CO., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

January 29, 1915.)

Action by John F. Conway against the Farish-Stafford Company.

PER CURIAM.

Inasmuch as there was no effective stipulation, the compensation of the referee must be limited to the legal rate prescribed by section 3296 of the Code of Civil Procedure. Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and proceeding remitted to the clerk of the county of Queens for the retaxation of plaintiff’s costs, upon notice. See, also, 157 App. Div. 481, 142 N. Y. Supp. 572.
*Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 96-40030

Summary Calendar

 

RODNEY J. GIBSON,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

UNIDENTIFIED SHAW, Warden at Coffield Unit;

UNIDENTIFIED CARR, CO III at Coffield Unit;

UNIDENTIFIED ALLAN, CO III at Coffield Unit;

UNIDENTIFIED WILCOX, Sgt. at Coffield Unit;

TDC DIRECTOR, James A. Collins,

Defendants-Appellees.

 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the

Eastern District of Texas

(6:94-CV-129)

 

August 7, 1996

Before GARWOOD, JOLLY and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.*

PER CURIAM:

Rodney J. Gibson, #598104, appeals the judgment of the

district court dismissing his civil rights action with prejudice.

He argues that the district court should have considered his
2

objections to the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation

following the evidentiary hearing, he was not given proper notice

of the evidentiary hearing, and Defendant Carr was not entitled to

qualified immunity. We have reviewed the record and Gibson’s brief

and conclude that Gibson has not demonstrated any error that

deprived him of his due process right of notice of the evidentiary

hearing. See Rodriguez v. Bowen, 857 F.2d 275, 276-77 (5th Cir.

1988). The motion for injunctive relief is DENIED.

The appeal is without arguable merit and thus frivolous. See

Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983); 5th Cir. R.

42.2. We caution Gibson that any additional frivolous appeals

filed by him or on his behalf will invite the imposition of

sanctions. To avoid sanctions, Gibson is further cautioned to

review all pending appeals to ensure that they do not raise

arguments that are frivolous because they have been previously

decided by this Court.

APPEAL DISMISSED. SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.
PGI Part 233 - PROTESTS, DISPUTES, AND

APPEALS

PGI 233.1 -PROTESTS

PGI 233.170 Briefing requirement for protested acquisitions valued at $1 billion or more.

PGI 233.171 Reporting requirement for protests of solicitations or awards.

PGI 233.2 -DISPUTES AND APPEALS

PGI 233.210 Contracting officer's authority.

Parent topic: PGI Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation

PGI 233.1 -PROTESTS

PGI 233.170 Briefing requirement for protested acquisitions valued at $1

billion or more.

In the event of a protest of a competitively awarded Major Defense Acquisition Program or of an

acquisition of services valued at $1 billion or more, the agency concerned shall provide a briefing to

the Principal Director, Defense Pricing and Contracting, within 10 days of the filing of the protest.

The briefing must outline—

(a) The basis of the protest;

(b) The agency’s position; and

(c) Any other information the agency deems relevant to the protest.

PGI 233.171 Reporting requirement for protests of solicitations or awards.

The Protest Tracker on the Procurement Integrated Enterprise Environment (PIEE) (accessible at

https://wawf.eb.mil/) is the bid protest data repository required by section 822(c) of the National

Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 (Pub. L. 115-232). When protests involving the same

contract or proposed award, valued at any amount, have been filed at both the Government

Accountability Office and the United States Court of Federal Claims (COFC), the contracting officer

shall report the protest information required in the Protest Tracker no later than 10 days after the

outcome of the protest at the COFC. Instructions on reporting protest information in the Protest

Tracker are available on the PIEE webpage.

PGI 233.2 -DISPUTES AND APPEALS
PGI 233.210 Contracting officer's authority.

When it would be helpful in reviewing the current claim, the contracting officer should get

information on claims previously filed by the contractor. Such information may provide a historical

perspective of the nature and accuracy of the claims submitted by the contractor and how they were

settled. Potential sources for the information include the contracting activity’s office of legal

counsel, other contracting activities, and the Defense Contract Audit Agency.
IV 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 480 

Permitting individuals to be admitted to the Hall of the House in order 

to obtain footage of the House in session for inclusion in the orientation 

film to be shown to visitors at the Capitol Visitor Center. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 6, 2005 

Mr. DREIER (for himself and Ms. SLAUGHTER) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Rules 

RESOLUTION 

Permitting individuals to be admitted to the Hall of the 

House in order to obtain footage of the House in session 

for inclusion in the orientation film to be shown to visitors at the Capitol Visitor Center. 

1 Resolved, That the Speaker, in consultation with the 

2 minority leader, may designate individuals to be admitted 

3 to the Hall of the House and the rooms leading thereto 

4 in order to obtain film footage of the House in session 

5 for inclusion in the orientation film to be shown to visitors 

6 at the Capitol Visitor Center. 

Æ
1805.303 Announcement of contract awards.

(a)(i) In lieu of the threshold cited in FAR 5.303(a), a NASA Headquarters public announcement is

required for award of contract actions that have a total anticipated value, including unexercised

options, of $5 million or greater.

Parent topic: Subpart 1805.3—Synopses of Contract Awards
#### § 600.201 Scope of §§ 600.200 through 600.205.

This section contains general rules pertaining to this part and procedures for control of exceptions from this subpart.
# SUBPART 28.1 – BONDS AND OTHER FINANCIAL PROTECTIONS

*(Revised March 29, 2016 through PROCLTR 2016-06)*

**Parent topic:**PART 28 – BONDS AND INSURANCE

## 28.106 Administration.

### 28.106-90 Review of bonds and consent of surety.

Contracting officers shall obtain legal sufficiency from Office of Counsel on all bonds and all consents of surety.
226 So.2d 525

#### Joseph A. CONINO, Individually and on behalf of his minor son, Joseph A. Conino, Jr. v. Alvin P. LANDRY, Southeastern Fire Insurance Company and Allstate Insurance Company. DeWitt Clinton McNUTT, II, Individually and on behalf of his minor son, Dewitt Clinton McNutt, III v. Alvin P. LANDRY and Southeastern Fire Insurance Company.

No. 49972.

Oct. 1, 1969.

In re: Mrs. DeWitt Clinton McNutt, II, individually and on behalf of her minor son, DeWitt Clinton McNutt, III, applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Jefferson. 222 So.2d 525.

The application is denied. According to the facts of this case as found to be by the Court of Appeal, there appears no error of law in the judgment complained of.
2007-1949.

#### State v. Blackburn.

Guernsey App. No. 06 CA 37, 2007-Ohio-4282. Reported at 116 Ohio St.3d 1436, 2007-Ohio-6518, 877 N.E.2d 988. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.

Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer and O’Donnell, JJ., dissent.
##### 



Certification Pursuant to Section 302  of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of B.H.I.T, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the
periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the small business issuer and have:
    5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business
issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):




---



##### 



Date: August 14, 2007/s/ Paul S. Dennis

Paul S. DennisInterim Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 245 (Wednesday, December 22, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 80486]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-32072]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. PR11-76-000]


Corning Natural Gas Corporation; Notice of Filing

December 15, 2010.
    Take notice that on December 13, 2010, Corning Natural Gas 
Corporation resubmitted marked and clean versions to correct data 
errors contained in its October 18, 2010, filing in Docket No. PR11-7-
000.
    Any person desiring to participate in this rate filing must file in 
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be considered 
by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, 
but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any 
person wishing to become a party must file a notice of intervention or 
motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, motions, or protests 
must be filed on or before the date as indicated below. Anyone filing 
an intervention or protest must serve a copy of that document on the 
Applicant. Anyone filing an intervention or protest on or before the 
intervention or protest date need not serve motions to intervene or 
protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 7 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#01474453424e6f6d686f64527471716e737541676473622f666e77"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d4929186979bbab8bdbab187a1a4a4bba6a094b2b1a6b7fab3bba2">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, December 22, 2010.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-32072 Filed 12-21-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### § 590.402 Conditional orders.

The Assistant Secretary may issue a conditional order at any time during a proceeding prior to issuance of a final opinion and order. The conditional order shall include the basis for not issuing a final opinion and order at that time and a statement of findings and conclusions. The findings and conclusions shall be based solely on the official record of the proceeding.
§ 435.500 Purpose. ( a ) This subpart establishes voluntary energy conservation performance standards for new residential buildings. The voluntary energy conservation performance standards are designed to achieve the maximum practicable improvements in energy efficiency and increases in the use of non-depletable sources of energy.
( b ) Voluntary energy conservation performance standards prescribed under this subpart shall be developed solely as guidelines for the purpose of providing technical assistance for the design of energy conserving buildings, and shall be mandatory only for the Federal buildings for which design for construction began before January 3, 2007.
( c ) The energy conservation performance standards will direct Federal policies and practices to ensure that cost-effective energy conservation features will be incorporated into the designs of all new Federal residential buildings for which design for construction began January 3, 2007.
[53 FR 32545, Aug. 25, 1988, as amended at 71 FR 70284, Dec. 4, 2006. Redesignated at 79 FR 61571, Oct. 14, 2014]
§ 452.5 Bidding procedures. DOE shall conduct an electronic reverse auction through a limited duration single bid per producer auction process open only to pre-auction eligible cellulosic biofuels producers. The following procedures shall be used: ( a ) DOE shall accept only electronic bids received from pre-auction eligible cellulosic biofuels producers during the open window established in the solicitation. The open window shall consist of a single continuous period of at least four hours for each auction.
( b ) Bids shall identify an estimated annual production amount from an eligible cellulosic biofuels production facility on a per gallon, site, entity, and year specific basis for a consecutive six year production period. A bid also may be submitted for additional incentives for uncovered production volumes at a site where an award was made in an earlier auction round.
( c ) All bids must set forth the methodology used to derive the estimates of annual production volumes covered by the bid and the bid shall be calculated on a gasoline equivalent volumetric basis using the lower heating Btu value of the fuel compared to the lower heating Btu value of gasoline.
( d ) All bids will be confidential until 45 days after the close of the window for submission of bids for the reverse auction.
( e ) Bid evaluation and incentive awards selection procedures include the following: ( 1 ) After DOE evaluates the bids received during the open window, it shall, within 45 days following the close of the open window for submission of bids for the reverse auction, announce on DOE's website and by direct mail the names of the successful bidders and the terms of their bids.
( 2 ) DOE shall issue awards for the bid production amounts beginning with the bidder that submitted the bid for the lowest level of production incentive on a per gallon basis.
( 3 ) In the event of a tie among the lowest bids, preference will be given to the lowest tied bidder based on DOE's evaluation of the extent to which the tied bids meet the following criteria: ( i ) Demonstrates outstanding potential for local and regional economic development;
( ii ) Includes agricultural producers or cooperatives of agricultural producers as equity partners in the ventures; and
( iii ) Has a strategic agreement in place to fairly reward feedstock suppliers.
( 4 ) In the event more than one lowest tied bid equally meets the standards in paragraph (c)(3) of this section, the award will be distributed equally on a per capita basis among those lowest tied bidders meeting the standards.
#### Henry Jay BUNCH *v.*STATE of Arkansas

CR 06-1384

257 S.W.3d 533

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Opinion delivered May 24, 2007

*114
      *Dustin McDaniel,*Att’y Gen., by: *Brad Newman,*Ass’t Att’y Gen., for appellee.

Per Curiam.

A jury found appellant Flenry Jay Bunch guilty of aggravated robbery, three counts of attempted capital murder, felon in possession of a firearm, theft by receiving, possession ofmethamphetamine, possession ofpseudoephedrine with intent to manufacture methamphetamine, and simultaneous possession of drugs and a firearm. Appellant was sentenced to an aggregate term of 1,140 months’ imprisonment in the Arkansas Department of Correction. The Arkansas Court of Appeals affirmed the judgment with the modification that the aggravated-robbery charge be merged into one of the attempted-capital-murder charges. *Bunch v. State,*94 Ark. App. 247, 228 S.W.3d 534 (2006). Appellant timely filed in the trial court a pro se petition for postconviction relief under Ark. R. Crirn. P. 37.1, which was denied.

Appellant has brought an appeal of that order in this court, and the State now brings this motion to dismiss. The State alleges that appellant’s petition was not verified as required by Rule 37.1(c). Effective March 1, 2006, Rule 37.1 was amended to more clearly require that the petition be verified. That amendment provided the form of the affidavit to be attached to the petition. While appellant’s petition was notarized, it did not contain an affidavit or statement substantially in the form of the affidavit required by the Rule. We agree that appellant’s petition was deficient. Appellant did later file a motion to amend his petition, which, if sufficient, would have been within the sixty-day period under Ark. R. Crim. P. 37.2(c) for a timely petition. That motion, however, was also not properly verified according to Rule 37.1(c).

Because appellant failed to meet the requirements for postconviction relief under Rule 37.1, the trial court did not err in denying appellant’s petition. Although the trial court did not deny the petition based upon its lack of verification, the trial court could not consider the issues in the petition. *See Shaw v. State,*363 Ark. 156, 211 S.W.3d 506 (2005). This court has consistently held that an appeal of the denial of postconviction relief will not be *115permitted to go forward where it is clear that the appellant could not prevail. *Pardue v. State,*338 Ark. 606, 999 S.W.2d 198 (1999) (per curiam); *Seaton v. State,*324 Ark. 236, 920 S.W.2d 13 (1996) (per curiam); *Harris v. State,*318 Ark. 599, 887 S.W.2d 514 (1994) (per curiam); *Reed v. State,*317 Ark. 286, 878 S.W.2d 376 (1994) (per curiam). It is clear here that appellant cannot prevail because the record does not establish that the trial court could consider appellant’s petition. Because the petition was not verified as required by Rule 37.1(c), we dismiss the appeal and the State’s request for an extension of time in which to file its brief is moot.

Motion to dismiss granted; motion for extension of time moot.