alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 2
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

§ 2.643 Acceptance and docketing of application for limited work authorization. ( a ) Each part of an application submitted in accordance with § 2.101(a)(9) will be initially treated as a tendered application. If it is determined that any one of the parts as described in § 2.101(a)(9) is incomplete and not acceptable for processing, the Director of the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation will inform the applicant of this determination and the respects in which the document is deficient. A determination of completeness will generally be made within a period of 30 days.
( b ) The Director will accept for docketing part one of an application for a construction permit for a utilization facility which is subject to § 51.20(b) of this chapter and is of the type specified in § 50.21(b)(2) or (3) or § 50.22 of this chapter or an application for a combined license where part one of the application as described in § 2.101(a)(9) is complete. Part one will not be considered complete unless it contains the information required by § 50.10(d)(3) of this chapter. Upon assignment of a docket number, the procedures in § 2.101(a)(3) and (4) relating to formal docketing and the submission and distribution of additional copies of the application must be followed.
( c ) If part one of the application is docketed, the Director will cause to be published in the Federal Register and send to the Governor or other appropriate official of the State in which the site is located, a notice of docketing of the application which states the purpose of the application, states the location of the proposed site, states that a notice of hearing will be published, and requests comments on the limited work authorization from Federal, State, and local agencies and interested persons. The notice will state that comments must be submitted to the NRC within 60 days or such other time as may be specified in the notice.
( d ) Part two of the application will be docketed upon a determination by the Director that it is complete.
( e ) If part two of the application is docketed, the Director will cause to be published in the Federal Register and sent to the Governor or other appropriate official of the State in which the site is located, a notice of docketing of part two of the application which states the purpose of the application, states that a notice of hearing will be published, and requests comments on the construction permit or combined license application, as applicable, from Federal, State, and local agencies and interested persons. The notice will state that comments must be submitted to the NRC within 60 days or such other time as may be specified in the notice.
[72 FR 49478, Aug. 28, 2007, as amended at 84 FR 65644, Nov. 29, 2019]
#### HENNESSY, Appellant, v. INTERBOROUGH RAPID TRANSIT CO., Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

June 12, 1914.)

Action by Annie Hennessy, as administratrix, against the Interborough Rapid Transit Company.

F. X. Sullivan, of New York City, for appellant.

B. H. Ames, of New York City, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Order filed.

LAUGHLIN, J., dissents.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

NATIONAL VEHICLE AND FUEL EMISSIONS LABORATORY

2000 TRAVERWOOD DRIVE

ANN ARBOR, MI 48105-2498

 OFFICE OF

AIR AND RADIATION

May 7, 2012

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Meeting Between EPA Staff and Various NGOs, May 4, 2012

FROM: Steven Silverman

TO: EPA Docket # EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0799

On May 4, 2012, various EPA staff (including Office Director Oge, Division Director 

France, Deputy Division Director Charmley, and Jeff Alson) participated in a teleconference 

with representative of various environmental NGOs, including the Sierra Club (Jessie PrenticeDunn and Ann Mesnikoff), Union of Concerned Scientists (Jim Kleisch and Michelle Robinson), 

Safe Climate Campaign (Dan Becker), Environment America (Nathan Wilcox), and Natural 

Resources Defense Council (Luke Tonachel). NGO representatives voiced concern about 

potential changes from the proposed rule which might weaken the stringency of the standards. 

They specifically mentioned incentives for CNG vehicles, expansion of off-cycle credit 

opportunities (or raising the cap on the proposed menu credits), and sales thresholds for pickup 

truck incentives. The response was that no final decisions have been made as to any of these 

issues.
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7377 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exempt survivor benefit 

annuity plan payments from the individual alternative minimum tax. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 20, 2018 

Mr. LARSEN of Washington introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exempt 

survivor benefit annuity plan payments from the individual alternative minimum tax. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Children of Fallen 

5 Servicemembers AMT Relief Act’’. 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7377 IH

1 SEC. 2. EXEMPTION FOR SURVIVOR BENEFIT ANNUITY 

2 PLAN PAYMENTS FROM THE INDIVIDUAL AL3 TERNATIVE MINIMUM TAX. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 59(j)(1) of the Internal 

5 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end 

6 the following new flush sentence: 

7 ‘‘Solely for purposes of this subsection, any annuity 

8 paid under the Survivor Benefit Plan under sub9 chapter II of chapter 73 of title 10, United States 

10 Code, shall be considered earned income of such 

11 child.’’. 

12 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

13 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

14 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officers of Longs Drug Stores Corporation
(the Company) hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:



(i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended April 28, 2005 (the Report) fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



|                   |  |  |  |                                                
|------------------ |  |  |  | -----------------------------------------------
|                   |  | 
|Date: June 2, 2005 |  |  |  | /s/    WARREN F. BRYANT                        
|                   |  |  |  | Warren F. Bryant                               
|                   |  |  |  | Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer



|                   |  |  |  |                                                                
|------------------ |  |  |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------
|                   |  | 
|Date: June 2, 2005 |  |  |  | /s/    STEVEN F. MCCANN                                        
|                   |  |  |  | Steven F. McCann                                               
|                   |  |  |  | Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer



A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Longs Drug Stores Corporation and will be retained by Longs Drug Stores Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
H. Res. 318

In the House of Representatives, U.S., 

June 13, 2006.

Whereas married fathers are more likely to have a close, enduring relationship with their children than unmarried 

fathers; 

Whereas according to a 1996 Gallup poll, 90.3 percent of 

Americans agree that fathers make a unique contribution 

to their children’s lives; 

Whereas in a study of fathers’ interaction with their children 

in intact two-parent families, nearly 90 percent of the fathers surveyed said that being a father is the most fulfilling role a man can have; 

Whereas a broad array of the Nation’s leading family and 

child development experts agree that it is in the best interests of children and the Nation as a whole to encourage more two-parent families where the father is actively 

involved with his children; 

Whereas promoting responsible fatherhood can help increase 

the chances that children will grow up with two caring 

parents; 

Whereas children with fathers at home tend to do better in 

school, to be less prone to emotional and behavioral problems, and to have more successful relationships; 
2

•HRES 318 EH 

Whereas boys and girls alike demonstrate greater self-control 

and ability to take initiative when fathers are actively involved in their upbringing; 

Whereas children who are apart from their biological fathers 

are, in comparison to other children, 5 times more likely 

to live in poverty, and more likely to bring weapons and 

drugs into the classroom, commit other crimes, drop out 

of school, commit suicide, abuse alcohol or drugs, or become pregnant as teenagers; 

Whereas the promotion of responsible fatherhood should not 

denigrate the standing or parenting efforts of single 

mothers, whose efforts are heroic, lessen the protection of 

children from abusive parents, cause women to remain in, 

or enter into, abusive relationships, or compromise the 

health or safety of a custodial parent; and 

Whereas Father’s Day is the third Sunday in June: Now, 

therefore, be it

Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

(1) commends the millions of fathers who serve as 

wonderful, caring parents for their children; 

(2) calls on fathers across the Nation to use Father’s Day to reconnect and rededicate themselves to 

their children’s lives, to spend Father’s Day with their 

children, and to express their love and support for their 

children; 

(3) urges men to understand the level of responsibility fathering a child requires, especially in the encour-
3

•HRES 318 EH 

agement of the moral, academic, and spiritual development of children; and 

(4) encourages active involvement of fathers in the 

rearing and development of their children, including the 

devotion of time, energy, and resources.

Attest: 

Clerk.
f

. MULLER ;
BATHYMETRIC MAP ATLANTIC OCEAN |

590000m.E

43]0000m.N,

Too N,

2
Y-
2
‘
BS

sNld 40 3903 NOLLISOS

|

TOOT

42 0000m.Ny.
wotuisog

Bathymetry compiled by the National Ocean Service (NOS) from Bathymetric Data other than EVALUATION OF BATHYMETRIC DATA OUTER CONTINE NTAL SH ELF RESOU RCE MANAGEMENT MAP so BATHYMETRIC DATA INDEX oer, MU LLE R |

NOS hydrographic surveys. This is a facsimile reproduction of the bathymetric manuscript and - |
does ‘not necessarily represent its ‘final published form. This information is not intended for Z . ee
navigational purposes. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE NOS NJ 19-6 (OCS) |
Bathymetric Contour Interval: 50 meters to maximum depth. NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION . It
Universal Transverse Mercator Grid, Zone 19; 10,000 meter ticks (--) are shown inside the Random Fracklines and Bathymetne goaeys daiee 1969 to 1974
neatline. : . 117,600,000 witira miinsom line specieg of 8.6500 4 maximum NATIONAL OCEAN SERVICE '
000, : : |
Protraction Diagram data shown in subdved (screened) black was compiled by the Minerals Bata Zorresied for sound selosty sccording to Matthews’ Tables, 1939. : 1983
Management Service. MMS} . - ‘
Bathymetric data from sources other than -
THIS MAP IS NOT A LEGAL DOCUMENT for Federal leasing purposes; for such purposes > . NOS hydrographic surveys, yor INDEX TO ADJOINING SHEETS 4°
use the MMS Outer Continental Shelf Official Protraction Diagrams. Produced at Washington, D.C. . - 40° |
Heavy line(s) indicate limits of these protraction diagrams erst seAnGon seamount '
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR b '
MINERALS MANAGEMENT SERVICE ee . |
oa
o
ucHuPI pane
TRANSVERSE MERCATOR PROJECTION ‘ we 36° Ny 1908 fica |
oe" 37° .
Scale 1:250,000 ‘ 2 7 i
5 i?) 5 10 15 20 Statute Miles °
. — ae - : .
5 10 15 20 25 30 Kilometers {

———— a ae |
5 oO 5 10 15 Nautical Miles ‘
E - 7
`[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 401 Reported in House (RH)]







                                                  House Calendar No. 81
109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 401

                          [Report No. 109-214]

   Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 3514) to provide an 
 extension of highway, highway safety, motor carrier safety, transit, 
    and other programs funded out of the Highway Trust Fund pending 
enactment of a law reauthorizing the Transportation Equity Act for the 
                             21st Century.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                July 29 (legislative day, July 28), 2005

   Mrs. Capito, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION


 
   Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 3514) to provide an 
 extension of highway, highway safety, motor carrier safety, transit, 
    and other programs funded out of the Highway Trust Fund pending 
enactment of a law reauthorizing the Transportation Equity Act for the 
                             21st Century.

    Resolved,  That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order without intervention of any point of order to consider in the 
House the bill (H.R. 3514) to provide an extension of highway, highway 
safety, motor carrier safety, transit, and other programs funded out of 
the Highway Trust Fund pending enactment of a law reauthorizing the 
Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century. All points of order 
against the bill and against its consideration are waived. The bill 
shall be considered as read. The previous question shall be considered 
as ordered on the bill to final passage without intervening motion 
except: (1) ten minutes of debate on the bill equally divided and 
controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee 
on Transportation and Infrastructure; and (2) one motion to recommit.
                                                  House Calendar No. 81

109th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                              H. RES. 401

                          [Report No. 109-214]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

   Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 3514) to provide an 
 extension of highway, highway safety, motor carrier safety, transit, 
    and other programs funded out of the Highway Trust Fund pending 
enactment of a law reauthorizing the Transportation Equity Act for the 
                             21st Century.

_______________________________________________________________________

                July 29 (legislative day, July 28), 2005

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed`
§ 503.10 Use of fluidized bed combustion not feasible—general requirement for permanent exemptions. ( a ) *OFE finding.* Except in the case of an exemption for fuel mixtures, OFE may deny permanent exemptions authorized under section 212 of the Act if OFE finds on a site-specific or generic basis that use of a method of fluidized bed combustion of an alternate fuel is economically and technically feasible.
( b ) *Demonstration.* If OFE has made such a finding, OFE will deny a petitioner's request for exemption unless the petitioner demonstrated that the use of a method of fluidized bed combustion is not economically or technically feasible. The petition or any supplement thereto required by OFE must include the following evidence: ( 1 ) If use of a method of fluidized bed combustion were to be required, evidence that the petitioner would be eligible for a permanent exemption for lack of alternate fuel supply, site limitations, environmental requirements, lack of adequate capital, or State or local requirements; or
( 2 ) Use of a method of fluidized bed combustion is not technically or economically feasible due to design or special circumstances.
[46 FR 59903, Dec. 7, 1981, as amended at 54 FR 52894, Dec. 22, 1989]
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

No. 21

- 10706 Summary Calendar

**United States of America,**

Plaintiff

— Appellee **,**

versus

**Juan Merced Garcia, Jr.,**

Defendant

— Appellant

**.**

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 1:20

- CR

- 53

- 1

Before **Southwick, Oldham** and **Wilson ,**  Circuit Judges

. **Per Curiam :**  *

The attorney appointed to represent Juan Merced Garcia, Jr., has
moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Garcia has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s

* Pursuant to **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED March 29, 2022
Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 21-10706 Document: 00516257799 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/29/2022No. 21

- 10706

2 brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appella te review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is
**GRANTED** , counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and
the **APPEAL IS DISMISSED**

. See **5th Cir. R.** 42.2

. Case: 21-10706 Document: 00516257799 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/29/2022
Case 2:06-cv-00785-MHT-WC     Document 80      Filed 04/03/2008     Page 1 of 1
§ 1705.04 Requests by persons for access to their own records. ( a ) *Requests in writing.* A person may request access to his or her own records in writing by addressing a letter to: Privacy Act Officer, Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board, 625 Indiana Avenue, NW., suite 700, Washington, DC 20004. The request should contain the following information: ( 1 ) Full name, address, and telephone number of requester,
( 2 ) Proof of identification, which should be a copy of one of the following: Valid driver's license, valid passport, or other current identification which contains both an address and picture of the requester,
( 3 ) The system of records in which the desired information is contained, and
( 4 ) At the requester's option, authorization for copying expenses (see § 1705.10 below).
( b ) *Requests in person.* Any person may examine his or her own records on the Board's premises. To do so, the person should call the Board's offices at 202-208-6400 and ask to speak to the Privacy Act Officer. This call should be made at least two weeks prior to the time the requester would like to see the records. During this call, the requester should be prepared to provide the same information as that listed in paragraph (a) of this section, except for proof of identification.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

JERALD HAMMANN,

Plaintiff Below, Appellant,

v.

DENNIS J. CARLO, RICHARD C. 

WILLIAMS, HOWARD C. 

BIRNDORF, ROSHAWN A. 

BLUNT, and DAVID J. 

MARGUGLIO,

Defendants Below, Appellees.

§

§ No. 52, 2024

§

§ Court Below—Court of

§ Chancery of the State of

§ Delaware

§ 

§ C.A. No. 2021-0506

§

§

§

§

§

 Submitted: August 9, 2024

 Decided: October 7, 2024

Before SEITZ, Chief Justice; VALIHURA and TRAYNOR, Justices.

ORDER

After careful consideration of the parties’ briefs and the record below, we find 

it evident that judgment should be affirmed on the basis of and for the reasons stated 

in the Court of Chancery’s January 12, 2024 Final Order and Judgment; August 23, 

2023 Memorandum Opinion; October 16, 2023 Order Addressing Motion for 

Reargument; March 24, 2023 Order Addressing Order to Show Cause; December 

18, 2023 Order Addressing Motion to Enforce; December 18, 2023 Order 

Addressing Plaintiff’s Motions for Sanctions; and January 5, 2024 order denying the 

plaintiff’s motion to reopen discovery. For the avoidance of doubt, the Court finds 
2

no reversible error as to any of the Court of Chancery’s decisions identified in the 

notice of appeal.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Court of 

Chancery is AFFIRMED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Karen L. Valihura

Justice
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 December 23, 2013

d1216

Order 

Clerk

December 23, 2013

147650 & (19)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 147650

COA: 315725

Wayne CC: 06-010995-FC

MICHAEL BRUCE CURB,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 31, 2013 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has 

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). The 

motion to remand is DENIED.
2007-1821.

#### Louden v. A.W. Chesterton Co.

Cuyahoga App. No. 90185. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County. Upon consideration thereof,

It is ordered by the court, sua sponte, that this case is consolidated with 2007-1819, *Louden v. A.W. Chesterton Co.,*Cuyahoga App. No. 90184.

It is further ordered by the court that briefing in this case and 2007-1819 shall be consolidated. The parties shall file two originals of each of the briefs permitted under S.Ct.Prac.R. VI and include both case numbers on the cover page of the briefs. The parties shall otherwise comply with the requirements of S.Ct.Prac.R. VI.