alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 63
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 63 appear at 81 FR 86909, Dec. 2, 2016.

§ 63.22 Filing and distribution of application. ( a ) An application for a construction authorization for a high-level radioactive waste repository at a geologic repository operations area at Yucca Mountain, and an application for a license to receive and possess source, special nuclear, or byproduct material at a geologic repository operations area at the Yucca Mountain site that has been characterized, any amendments to the application, and an accompanying environmental impact statement and any supplements, must be signed by the Secretary of Energy or the Secretary's authorized representative and must be filed with the Director in triplicate on paper and optical storage media.
( b ) DOE shall submit 30 additional copies, on paper and optical storage media, of each portion of the application and any amendments, and each environmental impact statement and any supplements. DOE shall maintain the capability to generate additional copies for distribution in accordance with written instructions from the Director or the Director's designee.
( c ) On notification of the appointment of an Atomic Safety and Licensing Board, DOE shall update the application, eliminating all superseded information, and supplement the environmental impact statement if necessary, and serve the updated application and environmental impact statement (as it may have been supplemented) as directed by the Board. Any subsequent amendments to the application or supplements to the environmental impact statement must be served in the same manner.
( d ) When an application, and any amendment to it is filed, copies on paper and optical storage media must be made available in appropriate locations near the proposed geologic repository operations areas at the Yucca Mountain site for inspection by the public. These copies must be updated as amendments to the application are made. The environmental impact statement and any supplements to it must be made available in the same manner. An updated copy of the application, and the environmental impact statement and supplements, must be produced at any public hearing held by the Commission on the application for use by any party to the proceeding.
( e ) DOE shall certify that the updated copies of the application, and the environmental impact statement as it may have been supplemented, as referred to in paragraphs (c) and (d) of this section, contain the current contents of these documents submitted as required by this part.
[66 FR 55792, Nov. 2, 2001, as amended at 68 FR 58815, Oct. 10, 2003; 69 FR 2280, Jan. 14, 2004]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-25-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-28-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-27-2000
<CASH>                                          40,739
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   88,157
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    429,746
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               593,290
<PP&E>                                         926,813
<DEPRECIATION>                                 384,091
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,295,950
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          380,920
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        19,613
<OTHER-SE>                                     673,082
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,295,950
<SALES>                                        955,731
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                          709,337
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  935,765
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,575
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 19,966
<INCOME-TAX>                                     8,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             11,966
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    11,966
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .31
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .31


</TABLE>
2143.205 Contract clause.       The clause at 2152.243-70 shall be inserted in all FEGLI Program contracts in lieu of the clauses in FAR 52.243-1 that are prescribed by FAR 43.205(a).    **Parent topic:** Subpart 2143.2 - Change Orders
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 (AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

In connection with Amendment No. 1 to Quarterly Report of Sionix Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David R. Wells, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to my knowledge and in my capacity as an officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and,

2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.

Date: January 13, 2010

| |                                                                                   
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |                                                                                   
| |                                                                                   
| | /s/ David R. Wells                                                                
| | David R. Wells                                                                    
| | President, Chief Financial Officer, and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer



A certification furnished pursuant to this Item will not be deemed filed for purposes of section 18 of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78r), or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the registrant specifically incorporates it by reference.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman

, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

May 2, 2017

a0424 

# Order

Clerk May 2, 2017

154108

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 154108

COA: 322195

Wayne CC: 13

- 009830

- FC

SHAROC RICHARDSON,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 26, 2016

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
#### SHEPARD, Respondent, v. PENNSYLVANIA R. CO., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

January 29, 1915.)

Action by J. Frank Shepard against the Pennsylvania Railroad Company.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. See, also, 86 Misc. Rep. 272, 148 N. Y. Supp. 388.

LAMBERT, J., dissents.
#### In the Matter of Paul Szemkow, Respondent, v County of Onondaga, Appellant.

Order unanimously affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated at Special Term, Murphy, J. (Appeal from order of Onondaga Supreme Court—notice of claim.) Present—Simons, J. P., Hancock, Jr., Schnepp, Doerr and Witmer, JJ.
No. 76-155.

#### Allied Witan Co. *v.*Aro Corp.

C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION

J.B., a minor child, by and )

through his next friend, )

Addie Ward, on behalf of )

himself and all others )

similarly situated, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

v. ) 2:06cv755-MHT

) 

WALTER WOOD, in his )

individual capacity, )

)

Defendant. )

J.B., a minor child, by and )

through his next friend, )

Addie Ward, on behalf of )

himself and all others )

similarly situated, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

v. ) 2:06cv908-MHT

) 

WALTER WOOD, in his )

individual capacity, )

)

Defendant. )

Case 2:06-cv-00755-MHT-CSC Document 45 Filed 07/24/2007 Page 1 of 2
ORDER

It is ORDERED that the motion to suppress (Doc. No.

43) is set for submission, without oral argument, on

August 9, 2007, with all briefs due by said date.

DONE, this the 24th day of July, 2007.

 /s/ Myron H. Thompson 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00755-MHT-CSC Document 45 Filed 07/24/2007 Page 2 of 2
IV 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 227

Recognizing and honoring the contributions of Indian Americans to economic 

innovation and society generally. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 21, 2005

Mr. TOM DAVIS of Virginia (for himself, Mr. FALEOMAVAEGA, Mr. WILSON

of South Carolina, Ms. ROS-LEHTINEN, Mr. JINDAL, Mr. MENENDEZ, 

Mr. LANTOS, Mr. MCNULTY, Ms. WATSON, Mr. CROWLEY, Mr. 

PALLONE, Mr. CANNON, Mrs. BLACKBURN, Mrs. CAPITO, Mr. CHOCOLA, 

Mr. ENGLISH of Pennsylvania, Mr. LEWIS of California, Mr. SWEENEY, 

Mr. RENZI, Mr. FRANKS of Arizona, Mr. SOUDER, Mrs. MILLER of 

Michigan, Ms. FOXX, Mr. WAXMAN, Mr. BERMAN, Mr. WYNN, Ms. LORETTA SANCHEZ of California, Mr. HASTINGS of Florida, Mr. RANGEL, 

Mr. TURNER, Mr. HOLT, Mr. SHAYS, Mr. MORAN of Virginia, Mr. CHANDLER, Ms. ZOE LOFGREN of California, Mr. COX, Mr. PORTER, Mr. NEY, 

Mr. SMITH of New Jersey, Mrs. CAPPS, Mr. KNOLLENBERG, Mr. MURPHY, Mr. MCKEON, Mr. DUNCAN, Mr. GIBBONS, Mr. PEARCE, Mr. 

WELLER, Mrs. BONO, Mr. SHUSTER, Mr. HYDE, Mr. BONILLA, Mr. 

WALDEN of Oregon, Mr. FOLEY, Mr. PLATTS, and Mr. ISSA) submitted 

the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Government Reform 

RESOLUTION

Recognizing and honoring the contributions of Indian 

Americans to economic innovation and society generally.

Whereas the United States is deeply enriched by its Indian 

American residents; 

Whereas the Indian American community and the graduates 

of the Indian Institutes of Technology (IIT) in the 
2

•HRES 227 IH 

United States have made valuable and significant contributions to society in every profession and discipline; 

and 

Whereas IIT graduates are highly committed and dedicated 

to research, innovation, and promotion of trade and 

international cooperation between India and the United 

States: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

2 (1) recognizes the valuable and significant con3 tributions of Indian Americans to American society; 

4 (2) honors the economic innovation attributable 

5 to graduates of the Indian Institutes of Technology; 

6 and 

7 (3) urges all Americans to recognize the con8 tributions of Indian Americans and have a greater 

9 appreciation of the role Indian Americans have 

10 played in helping to advance and enrich American 

11 society.

Æ
Exhibit 12.2  Questar Pipeline Company Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges  3 Months Ended March 31,20112010(dollars in millions)EarningsIncome before income taxes and adjustment for income
from equity investee$23.1$26.2Add (deduct):Fixed charges7.97.9Distributed income from equity investee1.00.8Capitalized interest(0.3)(0.1)Total Earnings$31.7$34.8--Fixed ChargesInterest expense$7.1$7.4Capitalized interest0.30.1Estimate of interest within rental expense0.50.4Total Fixed Charges$7.9$7.9--Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges4.04.4  For purposes of this presentation, earnings represent income before income taxes adjusted for fixed charges, earnings and distributions of equity investee. Income before income taxes includes Questar Pipeline's share of pretax earnings of equity investee. Fixed charges consist of total interest charges (expensed and capitalized), amortization of debt issuance costs and losses from reacquired debt, and the interest portion of rental expense estimated at 50%.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of AccuPoll Holding Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, William E. Nixon, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


November 14, 2005                                  /s/ William E. Nixon
                                                   -----------------------------
                                                   William E. Nixon
                                                   Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
§ 601.605 Inspector General report. ( a ) The Inspector General, or other official as specified in paragraph (b) of this section, of each agency shall prepare and submit to Congress each year, commencing with submission of the President's Budget in 1991, an evaluation of the compliance of that agency with, and the effectiveness of, the requirements herein. The evaluation may include any recommended changes that may be necessary to strengthen or improve the requirements.
( b ) In the case of an agency that does not have an Inspector General, the agency official comparable to an Inspector General shall prepare and submit the annual report, or, if there is no such comparable official, the head of the agency shall prepare and submit the annual report.
( c ) The annual report shall be submitted at the same time the agency submits its annual budget justifications to Congress.
( d ) The annual report shall include the following: All alleged violations relating to the agency's covered Federal actions during the year covered by the report, the actions taken by the head of the agency in the year covered by the report with respect to those alleged violations and alleged violations in previous years, and the amounts of civil penalties imposed by the agency in the year covered by the report.
(October 23, 1980)

#### Ninth Federal Savings and Loan Association of New York City, Respondent, v Quote Me, Inc., Appellant.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered April 11, 1980, denying defendant’s motion to set aside a default judgment and the judgment entered April 16, 1980, in plaintiff’s favor, unanimously reversed, on the law, and in the exercise of discretion, without costs or disbursements, the motion granted and the judgment vacated. As this matter was about to proceed to trial without a jury, defendant’s attorney, stating "I am probably the main witness for the defendant in this action”, requested permission to participate both as trial counsel and as a witness. Citing DR 5-102 of the Code of Professional Responsibility, the court ruled that it would refuse to permit counsel to testify if he participated in the trial as defendant’s attorney. While conceding that he had been aware of the ethical requirement that an attorney withdraw from the conduct of a trial when it becomes apparent that he ought to be called as a witness on his client’s behalf, counsel explained that his firm, of which he was but an associate,' had believed that the case would be settled. Moreover, he had thought the firm would engage outside counsel. In addition, neither he nor his adversary expected the case to be reached for trial that day. When counsel stated that he had sought but was refused an adjournment in the calendar part, the court responded, "So I have no alternative but to proceed with the case.” Faced with the dilemma of not being permitted to testify if he continued to represent defendant, and being denied an adjournment to engage trial counsel, the attorney refused to participate further and left the courtroom. The matter immediately proceeded to inquest, at which plaintiff was awarded $125,559.18. Judgment was subsequently entered. We find that the court improvidently exercised its discretion in denying defendant a reasonable adjournment to engage other trial counsel. Counsel’s testimony was, as the court was aware, crucial to defendant’s case. The matter had been on the Trial Calendar for but three months and had only been adjourned twice. No suggestion of prejudice to plaintiff was evident. In fact, its attorney did not oppose adjournment. The law favors the resolution of cases on the merits. "Reason and justice dictate that a party be afforded its day in court” *(Kahn v Stamp,*52 AD2d *620748). While it is true that justice delayed is justice denied, expedition of cases should not become an end in itself. The court was undoubtedly affected at what it perceived to be counsel’s dilatory tactics, but in the circumstances presented we believe that a final adjournment should have been granted. Concur — Fein, J. P., Sullivan, Lupiano and Bloom, JJ.
Editorial Note on Part 26
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 26 appear at 87 FR 71455, Nov. 22, 2022.

§ 26.93 Preparing for alcohol testing. ( a ) Immediately before collecting a specimen for alcohol testing, the collector shall— ( 1 ) Ask the donor whether he or she, in the past 15 minutes, has had anything to eat or drink, belched, or put anything into his or her mouth (including, but not limited to, a cigarette, breath mint, or chewing gum), and instruct the donor that he or she should avoid these activities during the collection process;
( 2 ) If the donor states that he or she has not engaged in the activities listed in paragraph (a)(1) of this section, alcohol testing may proceed;
( 3 ) If the donor states that he or she has engaged in any of the activities listed in paragraph (a)(1) of this section, inform the donor that a 15-minute waiting period is necessary to prevent an accumulation of mouth alcohol from leading to an artificially high reading;
( 4 ) Explain that it is to the donor's benefit to avoid the activities listed in paragraph (a)(1) of this section during the collection process;
( 5 ) Explain that the initial and confirmatory tests, if a confirmatory test is necessary, will be conducted at the end of the waiting period, even if the donor has not followed the instructions; and
( 6 ) Document that the instructions were communicated to the donor.
( b ) With the exception of the 15-minute waiting period, if necessary, the collector shall begin for-cause alcohol and/or drug testing as soon as reasonably practical after the decision is made that for-cause testing is required. When for-cause alcohol testing is required, alcohol testing may not be delayed by collecting a specimen for drug testing.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                       2,068,106
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,564,700
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,112,965
<PP&E>                                       9,952,710
<DEPRECIATION>                             (2,629,437)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              12,069,044
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,725,408
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    345,455
<COMMON>                                        48,578
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,949,603
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                12,069,044
<SALES>                                      5,470,449
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,470,449
<CGS>                                        3,348,801
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,348,801
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             3,634,662
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              16,720
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,529,734)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,529,734)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,529,734)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.32)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.32)
        

</TABLE>