alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 503.37 Cogeneration.

The following table may be used to determine eligibility for a permanent exemption based on oil and natural gas savings.

| State name | Oil/gas savings Btu/kWh |
| --- | --- |
| Alabama | 33 |
| Arizona | 802 |
| Arkansas | 1,363 |
| California | 3,502 |
| Colorado | 289 |
| Connecticut | 3,924 |
| Delaware | 3,478 |
| Washington, DC. | 895 |
| Florida | 3,177 |
| Georgia | 45 |
| Idaho | 0 |
| Illinois | 250 |
| Indiana | 53 |
| Iowa | 147 |
| Kansas | 686 |
| Kentucky | 34 |
| Louisiana | 4,189 |
| Maine | 2,560 |
| Maryland | 895 |
| Massachusetts | 5,250 |
| Michigan | 256 |
| Minnesota | 151 |
| Mississippi | 1,519 |
| Missouri | 57 |
| Montana | 60 |
| Nebraska | 139 |
| Nevada | 761 |
| New Hampshire | 2,695 |
| New Jersey | 1,894 |
| New Mexico | 1,528 |
| New York | 4,219 |
| North Carolina | 49 |
| North Dakota | 47 |
| Ohio | 36 |
| Oklahoma | 5,180 |
| Oregon | 0 |
| Pennsylvania | 771 |
| Rhode Island | 1,800 |
| South Carolina | 24 |
| South Dakota | 36 |
| Tennessee | 20 |
| Texas | 4,899 |
| Utah | 107 |
| Vermont | 105 |
| Virginia | 460 |
| Washington | 3 |
| West Virginia | 126 |
| Wisconsin | 72 |
| Wyoming | 75 |

Average Annual Utilization of Oil and Natural Gas for Electricity Generation by State

[BTU's per KWHR sold]

Data are based upon 1987 oil, natural gas and electricity statistics published by DOE's Energy Information Administration.

# Example:

The proposed cogeneration project is to be located in Massachusetts and is to use distillate oil. It will have a capacity of 50 MW, an average annual heat rate of 7600 BTU/KWHR, and be operated at a capacity factor of 90%. The annual fuel consumption is therefore calculated to be 2,996 × 109 Btu/yr. (50,000 KW × 7600 BTU/KWHR × .9 × 8760 HR/YR) The oil and gas backed off the grid would be calculated to be .2070 × 109 BTU/YR. (50,000 KW × 5250 BTU/KWHR × .9 × 8760 HR/YR) since the proposed unit would consume more oil that would be “backed off” the grid, the unit would not be eligible for a permanent exemption based on savings of oil and natural gas.

[54 FR 52895, Dec. 22, 1989]
# L_2023135EN.01005201.xml

| 23.5.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 135/52 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.5.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 135/52

---

Notice concerning the date of entry into force of the Agreement between the European Union and the United States of America pursuant to Article XXVIII of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) 1994 relating to the modification of concessions on all the tariff-rate quotas included in the EU Schedule CLXXV as a consequence of the United Kingdom’s withdrawal from the European Union

The Agreement between the European Union and the United States of America pursuant to Article XXVIII of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) 1994 relating to the modification of concessions on all the tariff-rate quotas included in the EU Schedule CLXXV as a consequence of the United Kingdom’s withdrawal from the European Union (1), signed in Brussels on 17 January 2023, entered into force on 2 May 2023.

1

---

(1)  
  OJ L 119, 5.5.2023, p. 3.

1

---
First amendment to the Praxair, Inc. Equalization Benefit Plan



 Exhibit 10.05f 
 FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE 
 PRAXAIR, INC.

 EQUALIZATION BENEFIT PLAN 
 (AS AMENDED AND RESTATED EFFECTIVE DECEMBER 31, 2007) 
 Article III,
Section 1(c) of the Praxair, Inc. Equalization Benefit Plan (As Amended and Restated Effective December 31, 2007) is hereby amended by the addition of the following sentence at the end thereof, effective as of January 1, 2010:

 “Notwithstanding the prior sentence, with respect to benefits that become payable on account of a Traditional-Design
Participant’s termination of employment occurring after December 31, 2009, lump sum payments shall be calculated using a discount rate equal to the average of the 10 year Aaa municipal bond rate as published by Moody’s or a similar
rating service for the months of July through December of the year immediately prior to the year in which such Participant terminated employment.” 
  

			
	PRAXAIR, INC.
		
	By:	 	  

		
	Date:
Editorial Note on Part 51
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 51 appear at 80 FR 74980, Dec. 1, 2015.

§ 51.55 Environmental report—standard design certification. ( a ) Each applicant for a standard design certification under subpart B of part 52 of this chapter shall submit with its application a separate document entitled, “Applicant's Environmental Report—Standard Design Certification.” The environmental report must address the costs and benefits of severe accident mitigation design alternatives, and the bases for not incorporating severe accident mitigation design alternatives in the design to be certified.
( b ) Each applicant for an amendment to a design certification shall submit with its application a separate document entitled, “Applicant's Supplemental Environmental Report—Amendment to Standard Design Certification.” The environmental report must address whether the design change which is the subject of the proposed amendment either renders a severe accident mitigation design alternative previously rejected in an environmental assessment to become cost beneficial, or results in the identification of new severe accident mitigation design alternatives that may be reasonably incorporated into the design certification.
[72 FR 49513, Aug. 28, 2007]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         216,560
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   14,326
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,245,829
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,760,312
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           53,856
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    87,477,547
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,760,312
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                47,014
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   86,471
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (39,457)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (39,457)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (39,457)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00
        

</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR

THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

ANGELA PRICE, )

)

Plaintiff, )

v. ) CASE NO. 3:06-cv-742-MEF

)

ROANOKE CITY BOARD OF )

EDUCATION, )

)

Defendant. )

ORDER

It is hereby ORDERED that on or before March 26, 2008, Plaintiff shall file either

a joint stipulation of dismissal that complies with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41, or a

statement explaining why they are unable to do so.

DONE this 12th day of March, 2008.

 /s/ Mark E. Fuller 

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-00742-MEF-WC Document 41 Filed 03/12/2008 Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 473 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 473

           Condemning the racist remarks of William Bennett.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 29, 2005

Mr. Rush submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
           Condemning the racist remarks of William Bennett.

Whereas William J. Bennett hosts a radio program, ``Morning in America'', which 
        airs on approximately 115 radio stations with an estimated weekly 
        audience of 1.25 million listeners;
Whereas on September 28th, 2005, Mr. Bennett said on his radio program, ``But I 
        do know that it's true that if you wanted to reduce crime, you could, if 
        that were your sole purpose, you could abort every black baby in this 
        country, and your crime rate would go down.''; and
Whereas Mr. Bennett's remarks are outrageous and blatantly racist: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) condemns the comments made by William J. Bennett on his 
        radio program, ``Morning in America'', as outrageous racism of 
        the most bigoted and ignorant kind; and
            (2) condemns all manifestations and expressions of racism 
        and ethnic intolerance.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 217.75 Compliance conflicts.

If compliance with any provision of the Defense Production Act and other applicable statutes, this part, or an official action would prevent a person from filling a rated order or from complying with another provision of the Defense Production Act and other applicable statutes, this part, or an official action, the person must immediately notify the Department of Energy for resolution of the conflict.
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed December 20, 2022.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-22-00744-CV

JOSHUA VAN PETERSON, Appellant

V.

MORRISON SUPPLY COMPANY, LLC D/B/A EXPRESSIONS HOME 

GALLERY, Appellee

On Appeal from the 190th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2018-10093

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This is an appeal from an order signed March 24, 2022. The notice of appeal 

was filed October 7, 2022. To date, our records show that appellant has not paid 

the appellate filing fee. See Tex. R. App. P. 5 (requiring payment of fees in civil 

cases unless party is excused by statute or by appellate rules from paying costs).

Tex. Gov’t Code § 51.207 (appellate fees and costs).
2

On November 17, 2022, this court ordered appellant to pay the appellate 

filing fee on or before November 28, 2022 or the appeal would be dismissed. 

Appellant has not paid the appellate filing fee or otherwise responded to the court’s 

order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c) (allowing 

involuntary dismissal of case because appellant has failed to comply with notice 

from clerk requiring response or other action within specified time). 

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Christopher and Justices Bourliot and Wilson
#### § 501.30 Purpose and scope.

This subpart establishes the procedures for requests for and the conduct of public hearings; for submission of written comments; and for requests for and conduct of conferences pursuant to an administrative proceeding before OFE. Hearings shall be convened at the request of any interested person, in accordance with section 701(d) of FUA, and shall be held at a time and place to be decided by the Presiding Officer.
###### Editorial Note on Part 51

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 51 appear at 80 FR 74980, Dec. 1, 2015.

#### § 51.81 Distribution of draft environmental impact statement.

Copies of the draft environmental impact statement and any supplement to the draft environmental impact statement will be distributed in accordance with the provisions of § 51.74.
PGI 216.405-1 Cost-plus-incentive-fee

contracts.

Give appropriate weight to basic acquisition objectives in negotiating the range of fee and the fee

adjustment formula. For example—

(1) In an initial product development contract, it may be appropriate to provide for relatively small

adjustments in fee tied to the cost incentive feature, but provide for significant adjustments if the

contractor meets or surpasses performance targets; and

(2) In subsequent development and test contracts, it may be appropriate to negotiate an incentive

formula tied primarily to the contractor's success in controlling costs.

Parent topic: PGI 216.405 Cost-reimbursement incentive contracts.
REGULATORY EVALUATION

Directorate Identifier: 2009-NM-253-AD

Costs:

Labor per airplane (6 work-hours x $85/hour)

Parts per airplane

Cost per airplane

Number of U.S.-registered airplanes

Total fleet cost

$

$

$

SIO

-.Q

SIO

_0

$0

Executive Order 12866: I

Could the AD be considered a "significant regulatory action"?

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

YES () explain NO (X)

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific

requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of

transportation?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)
819.000 Scope of part.

(a) This part supplements FAR part 19 and implements the service-disabled veteran-owned small

business (SDVOSB), veteran-owned small business (VOSB), and small business provisions of 38

U.S.C. 8127 and 8128, Executive Order 13360, and the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 631 et. seq.)

as applied to the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA). This part also covers -

(1) Goals for using SDVOSBs and VOSBs;

(2) Priorities and preferences for using SDVOSBs/VOSBs;

(3) SDVOSB/VOSB eligibility and contract compliance;

(4) Setting aside acquisitions for SDVOSBs/VOSBs;

(5) Sole-source awards to SDVOSBs and VOSBs; and

(6) Evaluation preferences and contract clauses.

Parent topic: PART 819 - SMALL BUSINESS PROGRAMS
§ 60.130 General considerations. ( a ) Pursuant to the provisions of § 60.21(c)(2)(i), an application for construction authorization for a high-level radioactive waste repository at a geologic repository operations area, and an application for a license to receive, possess, store, and dispose of high-level radioactive waste in the geologic repository operations area, must include the principal design criteria for a proposed facility. The principal design criteria establish the necessary design, fabrication, construction, testing, maintenance, and performance requirements for structures, systems, and components important to safety and/or important to waste isolation. Sections 60.131 through 60.134 specify minimum requirements for the principal design criteria for the geologic repository operations area.
( b ) These design criteria are not intended to be exhaustive. However, omissions in §§ 60.131 through 60.134 do not relieve DOE from any obligation to provide such features in a specific facility needed to achieve the performance objectives.
[69 FR 2280, Jan. 14, 2004]
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7378 

To require a guidance clarity statement on certain agency documents. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 20, 2018 

Mr. LUETKEMEYER (for himself, Mr. LAMALFA, Mr. LONG, Mr. NORMAN, Mr. 

KELLY of Mississippi, Mr. SMITH of Missouri, and Mrs. WAGNER) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To require a guidance clarity statement on certain agency 

documents. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Guidance Clarity Act 

5 of 2018’’. 

6 SEC. 2. GUIDANCE CLARITY STATEMENT REQUIRED. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—A head of an agency shall include 

8 a guidance clarity statement as described in subsection (b) 

9 on any document the head of the agency issues that— 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7378 IH

1 (1) is not issued in accordance with the rule 

2 making process set forth in section 553 of title 5, 

3 United States Code; and 

4 (2) advises the public of the agency’s interpre5 tation of a statute or regulation that the agency ad6 ministers, or advises the public of the manner in 

7 which the agency intends to exercise a discretionary 

8 power. 

9 (b) CONTENTS OF GUIDANCE CLARITY STATE10 MENT.—Any guidance clarity statement required under 

11 subsection (a) shall be displayed prominently on the first 

12 page of the document and shall include the following: 

13 ‘‘This document has not been issued in accordance with 

14 the rule making process set forth in section 553 of title 

15 5, United States Code, and therefore it is not legally bind16 ing. Noncompliance with any standard, expectation, or re17 quirement described in this document does not definitively 

18 establish the violation of a statute or regulation.’’. 

19 (c) AGENCY DEFINED.—In this section, the term 

20 ‘‘agency’’ has the meaning given that term in section 551 

21 of title 5, United States Code. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Century
Pension Income Fund XXIII 1996 Third Quarter 10-Q and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such 10-Q filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000764543
<NAME> CENTURY PENSION INCOME FUND XXIII
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           7,289
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                          87,140
<DEPRECIATION>                                  20,913
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  78,261
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                         58,895
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                    (22,683)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    78,261
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 8,850
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                11,539
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,958
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,972)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  (30.41)<F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet.
<F2>Multiplier is 1.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
# L_2023068EN.01000101.xml

| 6.3.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 68/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.3.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 68/1

---

Information relating to the entry into force of the Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of North Macedonia on operational activities carried out by the European Border and Coast Guard Agency in the Republic of North Macedonia

The Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of North Macedonia on operational activities carried out by the European Border and Coast Guard Agency in the Republic of North Macedonia will enter into force on 1 April 2023, the procedure provided for in Article 22(2) of the Agreement having been completed on 27 February 2023.

---
PGI 247.305-10 Packing, marking, and consignment instructions.       Follow the procedures in DTR 4500.9-R, Defense Transportation Regulation, Part II, Chapter 208  http://www.transcom.mil/j5/pt/dtrpart2/dtr_part_ii_208.pdf.          Additional guidance for marking can be found at MIL-STD-129P (Document ID 129P) at  http://quicksearch.dla.mil/ and AR 700-15 at  http://www.apd.army.mil/jw2/xmldemo/r700_15/cover.asp.          Consignment locations can be found in the Transportation Facilities Guide (TFG) on the SDDC website at  https://eta.sddc.army.mil/default.asp?fa=general.  Access to this site requires an Electronic Transportation Account.    **Parent topic:** PGI 247.305 Solicitation provisions, contract clauses, and transportation factors.
Subpart 1224.1—Protection of Individual

Privacy

Parent topic: PART 1224—PROTECTION OF PRIVACY AND FREEDOM OF INFORMATION

1224.102-70 General.

(a) Records maintained in a Privacy Act system of records shall not be released except by the

Government or at the Government's direction regardless of whether the Government or a contractor

acting on behalf of the Government is maintaining the records. Examples of systems of records are:

(1) Personnel, payroll and background records about any officer or employee of DOT, or other

person, including his or her residential address;

(2) Medical histories and medical records concerning individuals, including applications for licenses;

and

(3) Any other record containing information about an individual which includes that individual's

name or other personal identifier.

(b) Examples of records to which the Privacy Act does not apply are:

(1) Records that are maintained by a contractor on individuals employed by the contractor in the

process of providing goods and services to the Federal government; and

(2) Student records generated in connection with the student's attendance (e.g., admission forms,

grade reports) at an educational institution contracted by the agency to provide training to students.

These records must be similar to those maintained on other students and must not be commingled

with records of other students.

1224.103 Procedures.

DOT rules and regulations implementing the Privacy Act of 1974 are located at 49 CFR part 10.
Case 1:06-cv-00775-TFM Document 5 Filed 09/13/2006 Page 1 of 5
Case 1:06-cv-00775-TFM Document 5 Filed 09/13/2006 Page 2 of 5
Case 1:06-cv-00775-TFM Document 5 Filed 09/13/2006 Page 3 of 5
Case 1:06-cv-00775-TFM Document 5 Filed 09/13/2006 Page 4 of 5
Case 1:06-cv-00775-TFM Document 5 Filed 09/13/2006 Page 5 of 5