alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                      14,115,393
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                2,378,849
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,145,427
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            21,185,101
<PP&E>                                     192,071,384
<DEPRECIATION>                              47,048,109
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             220,144,417
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       23,772,506
<BONDS>                                    169,002,815
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                 19,711,362
<COMMON>                                        61,954
<OTHER-SE>                                  51,513,504
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               220,144,417
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            52,890,130
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               30,825,479
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            18,509,006
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          11,363,898
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (7,808,253)
<INCOME-TAX>                               (2,411,285)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (5,396,968)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (5,396,968)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.99)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 364 Agreed to House (ATH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 364

 Commending the continuing improvement in relations between the United 
                   States and the Republic of India.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 18, 2005

Mr. DeLay (for himself, Ms. Pelosi, Mr. Hyde, and Mr. Lantos) submitted 
   the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 
                        International Relations

                             July 18, 2005

  The Committee on International Relations discharged; considered and 
                               agreed to

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Commending the continuing improvement in relations between the United 
                   States and the Republic of India.

Whereas the Republic of India achieved its independence from the British Empire 
        on August 15, 1947, and has since that time maintained a democratic 
        system of government;
Whereas India has in recent years opened its economy to a considerable extent to 
        trade and investment and has liberalized its internal economic system;
Whereas India's relationship with the United States has deepened in past years 
        and encompasses cooperation on matters relating to international 
        security, political stability, world trade, technology, science, and 
        health;
Whereas India and Pakistan, neighbors who have fought bitter wars in past 
        decades, have increased their efforts to settle their differences by 
        peaceful means;
Whereas Americans of Indian origin have made critical contributions to the 
        culture and economy of the United States;
Whereas the Prime Minister of India, His Excellency Dr. Manmohan Singh, has, in 
        his previous capacity as Finance Minister, helped shape India's economic 
        policies to permit the growth of free markets, which has led to much 
        greater economic prosperity for many people in India and the creation of 
        a large middle class; and
Whereas Prime Minister Singh has accepted an invitation by the United States to 
        make an official visit to Washington, D.C.: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives that 
the continuing improvement in relations between the United States and 
the Republic of India, exemplified by the current official visit of the 
Prime Minister of India, His Excellency Dr. Manmohan Singh, is to be 
commended, supported, and expanded in the interest of the people of 
India and the people of the United States.
                                 <all>
```
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Samuel Jones, Appellant.

Judgment of the County Court, Rockland County, rendered December 11,1967, affirmed. No opinion. The order of said court dated December 12, 1967 which denied defendant’s motion for a new trial has been reviewed on the appeal from the judgment. Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, Rabin, Hopkins and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16

- 50064 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.

FABIAN LUJAN

- HERNANDEZ , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 4:15

- CR

- 457

- 5

Before JOLLY, PRADO, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
The attorney appointed to represent Fabian Lujan

- Hernandez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Lujan

- Hernandez h a s not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED February 21, 2017 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 16-50064 Document: 00513883264 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/21/2017No. 16

- 50064

2 issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 16-50064 Document: 00513883264 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/21/2017
Case 1:06-cr-00170-WHA-CSC Document 265 Filed 12/15/2006 Page 1 of 1
Consumer Product Safety Alert

FROM THE U.S. CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION, WASHINGTON, D.C. 20207

P r event Poisoning and Death fro m

I ron-Containing Medicine

009611

The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission

(CPSC) warns that iron medications (sometimes

identified as ferrous sulfate, ferrous gluconate, or

ferrous fumarate) can be deadly to a young child.

Many adults may not realize the hazard of iron

preparations. The Commission recommends that

parents keep medicine with iron out of the reach of

young children.

Iron is available in combination with vitamins or

alone. According to poison control center data, iron

supplements are responsible for 30 percent of

pediatric poisoning deaths from medications. A

small number of iron pills consumed by a child can

cause death. Poisonings happen when children

swallow their parents’ iron pills. CPSC recommends that obstetricians and gynecologists tell

their maternity patients that prenatal medicine with

iron is poisonous to children.

CPSC requires that iron-containing medicines and

vitamins with iron be packaged in child-resistant

closures. Parents should always properly resecure

safety closures. In addition, parents should keep

medicines with iron out of the reach of children

and should properly discard iron pills after use so

children cannot reach them. Medicines should be

discarded by flushing down the toilet, not in a

wastebasket where children can find them.

Always use child-resistant closures

and keep iron-containing medicine

out of the reach of children.
(logo) C-III | C-III AssetManagement  

 

** **

**OFFICER’S CERTIFICATE**

**C-III Asset Management LLC**

 

 

The undersigned, Barry Davis,President of C-III Asset Management LLC *(f/k/a Centerline Servicing LLC)*,the Special Servicer under that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement datedas of December 1, 2012, relating to the **Deutsche Mortgage & AssetReceiving Corporation, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series COMM2012-CCRE5**(the “Pooling and Servicing Agreement”), hereby certifies asfollows: 

 

1.       a review of the activitiesof the Special Servicer and of its performance under the Pooling and ServicingAgreement during a portion of the preceding calendar year 2018 (September 26,2018 – December 31, 2018)(the “Reporting Period”) has been made under theundersigned’s supervision;

 

2.       to the best of theundersigned’s knowledge, based on such review, the Special Servicer maintainedan effective internal control system relating to its servicing of the MortgageLoans serviced by it and has fulfilled in all material respects its obligationsunder the Pooling and Servicing Agreement throughout the Reporting Period.

 

Capitalized terms nototherwise defined herein shall have the meanings given them in the Pooling andServicing Agreement.

 

 

**IN WITNESS WHEREOF**, as of the 1st day of March, 2019, I havehereuntosigned my name.

 

 

/s/ Barry Davis

**Barry Davis**, President

C-III Asset Management LLC, a

Delaware limited liabilitycompany
PGI 225.870-5 Contract administration.

(1) Assign contract administration in accordance with DFARS Part 242. When the Defense Contract

Management Agency will perform contract administration in Canada, name in the contract the

following payment office for disbursement of DoD funds (DoD Department Code: 17-Navy; 21-Army;

57-Air Force; 97-all other DoD components), whether payment is in Canadian or U.S. dollars:

DFAS Columbus Center

DFAS-CO/North Entitlement Operations

PO Box 182266

Columbus, OH 43218-2266.

(2) The following procedures apply to cost-reimbursement type contracts:

(i) The PWGSC automatically arranges audits on contracts with the Canadian Commercial

Corporation. Upon advice from PWGSC, the Canadian Commercial Corporation certifies the invoice

and forwards it with Standard Form (SF) 1034, Public Voucher, to the administrative contracting

officer for further processing and transmittal to the disbursing office.

(ii) For contracts placed directly with Canadian firms, the administrative contracting officer requests

audits from the PWGSC, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. Route requests for audit of non-Canadian

Commercial Corporation contracts and subcontracts with Canadian contractors through the

cognizant contract management office of the Defense Contract Management Agency.

(A) Within 25 days of the date of the audit request, PWGSC will provide—

An acknowledgement of receipt form;

An estimate of completion form; and

(3) A single point of contact to report the status of audit requests and the progress of audits.

(B) Audits will be completed within 24 months of the requested date for post-award audits.

(C) PWGSC will provide information to support the determination that the price is fair and

reasonable.

(D) The PWGSC—

(1) Approves invoices on a provisional basis pending completion of the contract and final audit;

(2) Forwards these invoices, accompanied by SF 1034, Public Voucher, to the administrative

contracting officer for further processing and transmittal to the disbursing officer; and

(3) Furnishes periodic advisory audit reports directly to the administrative contracting officer.

(A) Approves invoices on a provisional basis pending completion of the contract and final audit;

(B) Forwards these invoices, accompanied by SF 1034, Public Voucher, to the administrative

contracting officer for further processing and transmittal to the disbursing officer; and
(C) Furnishes periodic advisory audit reports directly to the administrative contracting officer.

Parent topic: PGI 225.870 Contracting with Canadian contractors.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

 _______________________________

ARTHUR JAMES TIGNER, #152 184 *

Plaintiff, *

 v. * 3:06-CV-713-MHT

 

OFFICER SELLER, et al., *

Defendants. *

 _______________________________

ORDER ON MOTION

Upon consideration of Defendants' Motion for Extension of Time, and for good

cause, it is ORDERED that:

1. Defendants' Motion for Extension of Time (Doc. No. 7) is GRANTED; and

2. Defendants are GRANTED an extension from September 26, 2006 to November

6, 2006 to file their answer and written report.

DONE, this 26th day of September, 2006.

/s/ Susan Russ Walker 

SUSAN RUSS WALKER

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-00713-MHT-SRW Document 8 Filed 09/26/2006 Page 1 of 1
§ 490.704 Procedures and documentation. ( a ) To receive a credit under this subpart, the fleet or covered person shall submit its request, on a form obtained from DOE, to the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, U. S. Department of Energy, EE-34, 1000 Independence Ave. SW., Washington, DC 20585, or such other address as DOE may publish in the Federal Register, along with the documentation required by paragraph (b) of this section.
( b ) Each request for a credit under this subpart must be submitted on or before the December 31 after the close of the applicable model year and must include written documentation stating the quantity of biodiesel purchased, for the given model year, for use in vehicles weighing in excess of 8,500 lbs. gross vehicle weight;
( c ) A fleet or covered person submitting a request for a credit under this subpart must maintain and retain purchase records verifying information in the request for a period of three years from December 31 immediately after the close of the model year for which the request is submitted.
H. Res. 520

In the House of Representatives, U.S., 

October 28, 2005.

Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall 

be in order to consider the conference report to accompany 

the bill (H.R. 2744) making appropriations for Agriculture, 

Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration, and Related Agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2006, 

and for other purposes. All points of order against the conference report and against its consideration are waived. The 

conference report shall be considered as read. 

Attest:

Clerk.
### Bryophytes and lichens: Small but indispensable forest dwellers

By: Martin HuttenAndrea Woodward**

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/fs15402

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (2 MB pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Integra Bank Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael
T. Vea, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




/s/ Michael T. Vea
------------------
Chairman of the Board, President
And Chief Executive Officer
August 14, 2002
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. AP-76,803

EX PARTE WILLIAM THOMAS WATTS, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. DIS-08-01654 IN THE 119TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM CONCHO COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of aggravated sexual

assault and sentenced to fiftyyears’ imprisonment. The Third Court of Appeals dismissed his appeal.

Watts v. State, No. 03-08-00725-CR (Tex. App.–Austin 2009, no pet.).

Applicant contends that he was denied his right to appeal. The trial court found that

Applicant was deprived of his right to appeal through no fault of his own. Ex parte Riley, 193

S.W.3d 900, 902 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). We find that Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to

file an out-of-time appeal of the judgment of conviction in cause number DIS-08-01654 from the
2

119th District Court of Concho County. Applicant is ordered returned to that time at which he may

give a written notice of appeal so that he may then, with the aid of counsel, obtain a meaningful

appeal. Within ten days of the issuance of this opinion, the trial court shall determine whether

Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court

shall immediately appoint an attorney to represent Applicant on direct appeal. All time limits shall

be calculated as if the sentence had been imposed on the date on which the mandate of this Court

issues. We hold that, should Applicant desire to prosecute an appeal, he must take affirmative steps

to file a written notice of appeal in the trial court within 30 days after the mandate of this Court

issues.

Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice-Correctional

Institutions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division. 

Delivered: May 23, 2012

Do not publish
SERVED: DECEMBER 17,2014 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

In The Matter Of: 

JOHN ALAN DAVIS 

Respondent 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

·. ... f ' ·~ . ' .--;, 

Docket No. FAA-2014-0409 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No. 2013-GL-13-0038 

ORDER DISMISSING PROCEEDING 

On November 20, 2014, an Order Continuing Rule 16 Litigation Scheduling Conference 

was filed. Among other things, this Order noted that during the September 30, 2014 telephone 

conference the parties stated that they had reached a settlement, but needed time to exchange and 

submit paperwork 

On December 16,2014, the FAA submitted, via fax, an untitled document stating that the 

parties have settled the case and requesting "that the matter be removed from the docket." The 

document is attached for filing in the FAA Hearing Docket. 

After having reviewed the case file, all pleadings and motions, all relevant caselaw, 

statutes, regulations, rules, and authority, and being fully advised; 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 

1. The Rule 16 Litigation Scheduling Conference, set for December 18,2014, at 10:00 a.m. 

Eastern time, is cancelled. 

2. Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. § 13.215, the FAA has withdrawn its Complaint, and this 

proceeding is dismissed with prejudice. 

Attachments: 1) Service List 

2) Untitled Document 
SERVICE LIST- BY U.S. MAIL 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W10001 

Ms. Kate Barber 

Complainant's Counsel 

Federal Aviation Administration, AGL-7 

2300 East Devon Avenue 

Des Plaines, IL 60018-4696 

TEL: 847-294-7862 

FAX: 847-294-7498 

Mr. John Alan Davis 

Respondent 

12052 1161

h St. 

Chippewa Falls, WI 54729 

Judge J.E. Sullivan 

US. Administrative Law Judge 

Office ofHearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

ONE COPY 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-6941 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

Docket No. FAA-2014-0409 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC--430. 
12/16/2014 16:14 8472948293 FAA AGL 7 COUNSEL PAGE 02/02 

,. ::;,(;m~TAtiON 1· ,-; · f(f;f.· c;r- ARJ*'s 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARING ; Zfil~ DEC \ b P \t! 3 8 

In The Matter Of: 

JOHN ALAN DAVIS 

Respondent 

WASHINGTON, DC . 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Docket No. FAA-2014-0409 

Case No. 2013·GL"l3-0038 

The parties in the above matter have settled the above case. We request that the matter 

be removed from the docket. 

Respectfully submitted, 

Office of Regional Counsel 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Great Lakes Region 

2300 E. Devon Avenue 

Des Plaines, IL 60018