alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     INFORMATION TAKEN FROM THE MARCH 31, 1997 FORM 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                        1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                JAN-01-1997 
<PERIOD-END>                                  MAR-31-1997 
<CASH>                                              1,580 
<SECURITIES>                                       30,788 
<RECEIVABLES>                                           0 
<ALLOWANCES>                                            0 
<INVENTORY>                                             0 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   32,704 
<PP&E>                                             20,492 
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (10,012) 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     44,412 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               3,607 
<BONDS>                                             4,313 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0 
<PREFERRED>                                             0 
<COMMON>                                               24 
<OTHER-SE>                                         36,228 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       44,412 
<SALES>                                                 0 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       75 
<CGS>                                                   0 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       6,478 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        0 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    195 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (6,353) 
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (6,353) 
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0 
<CHANGES>                                               0 
<NET-INCOME>                                      (6,353) 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      (0.30) 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           0 
                                              


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 308 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 308

Supporting the goals of National Marina Day and urging marinas continue 
        providing environmentally friendly gateways to boating.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 8, 2005

Mr. Dicks submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Supporting the goals of National Marina Day and urging marinas continue 
        providing environmentally friendly gateways to boating.

Whereas the people of the United States highly value their recreational time and 
        their ability to access the waterways of the United States, one of the 
        Nation's greatest natural resources;
Whereas in 1928, the National Association of Engine and Boat Manufacturers first 
        used the word ``marina'' to describe a recreational boating facility;
Whereas the United States is home to more than 12,000 marinas that contribute 
        substantially to local communities by providing safe and reliable 
        gateways to boating;
Whereas the marinas of the United States serve as stewards of the environment 
        and actively seek to protect the waterways that surround them for the 
        enjoyment of this generation and generations to come;
Whereas the marinas of the United States provide communities and visitors with a 
        place where friends and families, united by a passion for the water, can 
        come together for recreation, rest, and relaxation; and
Whereas the Marina Operators Association of America has designated August 13, 
        2005 as ``National Marina Day'' to increase awareness among citizens, 
        policymakers, and elected officials about the many contributions that 
        marinas make to communities: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved,  That the House of Representatives--
            (1) supports the goals of National Marina Day; and
            (2) urges that the marinas of the United States continue to 
        provide environmentally friendly gateways to boating for the 
        people of the United States.
                                 <all>
```
223 So.2d 874

#### Samuel H. VIGNES v. Nellie JARREAU et al.

No. 49938.

June 27, 1969.

In re: Nellie Jarreau et al. applying for certiorari, or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of Pointe Coupee. 222 So.2d 566.

Application denied. The result is correct.

SANDERS, J., is of the opinion a writ should be granted to review the important question pertaining to declaratory judgments.

SUMMERS, J., is of the opinion the writ should be granted.
§ 503.21 Lack of alternate fuel supply. ( a ) *Eligibility.* Section 211(a)(1) of the Act provides for a temporary exemption due to the unavailability of an adequate and reliable supply of an alternate fuel at a cost which does not substantially exceed the cost of using imported petroleum. To qualify, a petitioner must certify that: ( 1 ) A good faith effort has been to obtain an adequate and reliable supply of an alternate fuel of the quality necessary to conform to the design and operational requirements of the unit;
( 2 ) For the period of the proposed exemption, the cost of using such alternate fuel would substantially exceed the cost of using imported petroleum as a primary energy source as defined in § 503.6 (Cost calculation) of these regulations;
( 3 ) The petitioner will be able to comply with the applicable prohibitions of the Act at the end of the proposed exemption period; and
( 4 ) No alternate power supply exists, as required under § 503.8 of these regulations.
( b ) *Evidence required in support of a petition.* The petition must include the following evidence in order to make the demonstration required by this section: ( 1 ) Duly executed certifications required under paragraph (a) of this section;
( 2 ) Exhibits containing the basis for the certifications required under paragraph (a) of this section (including those factual and analytical materials deemed by the petitioner to be sufficient to support the granting of this exemption);
( 3 ) All data required by § 503.6 (cost calculation) of these regulations necessary for computing the cost calculation formula; and
( 4 ) The anticipated duration of the lack of alternate fuel supply which constitutes the basis for the exemption.
( c ) *Duration.* This temporary exemption, taking into account any extensions or renewals, may not exceed 10 years.
[46 FR 59903, Dec. 7, 1981, as amended at 47 FR 15315, Apr. 9, 1982; 54 FR 52894, Dec. 22, 1989]
exv10w46






EXHIBIT 10.46




SECOND AMENDMENT TO

THE THOMAS & BETTS

SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE INVESTMENT PLAN




(As Amended and Restated Effective January 1, 2007)



     WHEREAS, Thomas & Betts Corporation maintains the Thomas & Betts Supplemental Executive
Investment Plan (the “Plan”); and



     WHEREAS, it is desired to (i) clarify the participants for whom a nonelective contribution is
made under the Plan, (ii) correct typographical errors, and (iii) add The Lamson & Sessions Co. as
a participating employer in the Plan;



     NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows:



     1. Section 1.22 of the Plan is hereby amended to read as follows, effective January 1, 2008:




     §1.22 Participant: An Eligible Employee who has elected to participate in the
Plan and for whom Deferral Amounts are being credited and, with respect to eligibility for
Employer Nonelective Amounts under Article IVA, an Eligible Employee who is eligible for
the nonelective integrated employer contribution under the 401(k) Plan and who has Excess
Compensation.



     2. The last paragraph of Section 9.3 of the Plan is hereby amended by replacing the word
“exceeds” with the words “does not exceed”, effective January 1, 2007.



     3. The reference to §9.1(iii) in Section 9.4 of the Plan is hereby replaced with a reference
to §9.1(b)(iii), effective January 1, 2007.



     4. The reference to Article X in Section 9.5 of the Plan is hereby replaced with a reference
to Article IX, effective January 1, 2007.



     5. Appendix A to the Plan is hereby amended by adding the following participating employer:



	 	 	 
	Name	 	Date of Participation
	 
	 	 
	The Lamson & Sessions Co.: Clinton, Bowling Green
and Cleveland Retail locations

	 	January 1, 2009
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

vs. ) Case No. 3:06CR191-MHT

)

SPRING M. DAWSON )

PRETRIAL CONFERENCE ORDER

A pretrial conference was held on January 12, 2007 before the undersigned

Magistrate Judge. Present at this conference was the Honorable Kevin Butler, counsel for

the defendant, and Assistant United States Attorney Stephen P. Feaga, counsel for the

government. As a result of the conference, it is

ORDERED as follows:

1. Jury selection is set for February 5, 2007. The trial of this case is set for the

trial term commencing on February 5, 2007 before United States District Judge

Myron H. Thompson and is expected to last one day for trial.

2. There are no motions currently pending.

3. Proposed voir dire questions shall be filed on or before January 29, 2007.

Counsel should not include questions seeking information which is provided in the jury

questionnaire.

4. All Motions in Limine shall be filed on or before January 29, 2007. Motions

in Limine must be accompanied by a brief. Failure to file a brief will result in denial of

the motion.

Case 3:06-cr-00191-MHT-CSC Document 16 Filed 01/16/2007 Page 1 of 2
5. Proposed jury instructions shall be filed on or before January 29, 2007.

6. The court will not consider a plea pursuant to Rule 11(c) (1)(A) or (C) unless

notice is filed on or before noon on January 24, 2007. The government and defendant

are informed that if a defendant waits until the last minute to enter a plea, and if that plea,

for whatever reason, is not accepted by the court, the defendant and the government will

be expected to be prepared to go to trial on February 5, 2007. The court will not

continue the trial of this case as to any defendant because a defendant’s plea was not

accepted. In other words, the defendant and the government should not wait until the last

minute for a defendant to enter a guilty plea, and both the defendant and the government

should all be ready to go to trial on February 5, 2007, as to all defendants, even though a

particular guilty plea was not accepted by the court.

Done this 16 day of January, 2007. th

 /s/Charles S. Coody 

CHARLES S. COODY

CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 3:06-cr-00191-MHT-CSC Document 16 Filed 01/16/2007 Page 2 of 2
`[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 563 Reported in House (RH)]







                                                 House Calendar No. 123
109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 563

                          [Report No. 109-306]

   Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to 
  consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on 
                                 Rules.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

            November 18 (legislative day, November 17), 2005

   Mr. Gingrey, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION


 
   Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to 
  consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on 
                                 Rules.

    Resolved, That the requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII for a 
two-thirds vote to consider a report from the Committee on Rules on the 
same day it is presented to the House is waived with respect to any 
resolution reported on the legislative day of November 18, 2005, 
providing for consideration or disposition of any of the following 
measures:
            (1) A bill or joint resolution making general 
        appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2006, 
        any amendment thereto, or any conference report thereon.
            (2) A conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 3199) 
        to extend and modify authorities needed to combat terrorism, 
        and for other purposes.
            (3) A bill or joint resolution relating to flood insurance.
            (4) A bill to provide for reconciliation pursuant to 
        section 201 of the concurrent resolution on the budget for 
        fiscal year 2006.
                                                 House Calendar No. 123

109th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                              H. RES. 563

                          [Report No. 109-306]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

   Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to 
  consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on 
                                 Rules.

_______________________________________________________________________

            November 18 (legislative day, November 17), 2005

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed`
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

M.C., who sues by and through her )

mother and next friend, GAIL TATUM, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:06cv83-LES

) (LEAD CASE)

PACTIV CORPORATION, et al, )

)

Defendants. )

ORDER

On July 12, 2006, the court ordered the following cases consolidated for all pretrial

proceedings governed by FED. R. CIV. P. 26 through 27. 

2:06cv83-LES, M.C. v. Pactiv Corp., et al.

2:06cv84-LES, Phillips v. Pactiv Corp., et al.

2:06cv85-LES, Thompson v. Pactiv Corp., et al.

2:06cv86-LES, Edwards v. Pactiv Corp., et al.

2:06cv186-LES, Madden v. Pactiv Corp., et al.

2:06cv187-LES, Davis v. Pactiv Corp., et al.

2:06cv188-LES, Douglas v. Pactiv Corp., et al.

2:06cv189-LES, Thompson v. Pactiv Corp., et al.

2:06cv190-LES, Kelley v. Pactiv Corp., et al.

2:06cv191-LES, Cravey v. Pactiv Corp., et al.

See Doc. # 59. 

Since that date, mediation has been unsuccessful and the following additional cases have

been filed. 

2:06cv660-LES, Adams, et al., v. Pactiv Corp., et al.

2:06cv679-LES, Cassady, et al. v. Pactiv Corp., et al.

2:06cv680-LES, Brooks, et al. v. Pactiv Corp., et al.

2:06cv739-LES, Anderson et al., v. Pactiv Corp., et al.

2:06cv757-LES, Harrison, et al., v. Pactiv Corp., et al.

2:06cv758-LES, Lawrence, et al., v. Pactiv Corp., et al.

Case 2:06-cv-00759-LES-CSC Document 5 Filed 10/19/2006 Page 1 of 2
2

2:06cv759-LES, Hamilton v. Pactiv Corp., et al.

2:06cv904-LES, K.C. et al., v. Pactiv Corp., et al.

At this juncture, it appears that all of these cases should be consolidated for all pretrial

proceedings; provided, however, that at a later date, the court may unconsolidate these cases

should it become necessary. Accordingly, for good cause, it is

ORDERED that the afore-referenced cases be and are hereby CONSOLIDATED for all

pretrial proceedings. It is further

ORDERED that the above-styled case be and is hereby DESIGNATED as LEAD case,

and that all pleadings shall be filed only in the lead case.

The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to docket and place a copy of this order in each

case file referenced herein.

Counsel are reminded of M.D. ALA. LR 5.1 which governs the filing of discovery

materials in this district.

Done this 19 day of October, 2006. th

 /s/Charles S. Coody 

CHARLES S. COODY

CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00759-LES-CSC Document 5 Filed 10/19/2006 Page 2 of 2
#### § 603.1250 Data.

Recorded information, regardless of form or the media on which it may be recorded. The term includes technical data and computer software. It does not include information incidental to administration, such as financial, administrative, cost or pricing, or other management information related to the administration of a TIA.
H. Res. 1078

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

November 15, 2006.

Whereas the St. Louis Cardinals won the 102nd World Series 

on October 27, 2006; 

Whereas this is the 10th World Series title won by the St. 

Louis Cardinals; 

Whereas Manager Tony La Russa is one of only 2 managers 

in the history of baseball to win the World Series in both 

the National League and the American League; 

Whereas the manager and coaching staff have done a remarkable job guiding this team to victory; 

Whereas General Manager Walt Jocketty and owner Fred 

Hanser have assembled and led a great organization; 

Whereas all 25 players on the playoff squad contributed to 

the victory, including World Series Most Valuable Player 

David Eckstein, Gold Glove winners Albert Pujols and 

Scott Rolen, as well as Chris Carpenter, Randy Flores, 

Josh Hancock, Tyler Johnson, Josh Kinney, Braden 

Looper, Anthony Reyes, Jeff Suppan, Brad Thompson, 

Adam Wainwright, Jeff Weaver, Gary Bennett, Yadier 

Molina, Ronnie Belliard, Aaron Miles, Chris Duncan, Jim 

Edmonds, Juan Encarnacion, John Rodriguez, Scott 

Spiezio, So Taguchi, and Preston Wilson; 
2

•HRES 1078 EH 

Whereas the sole goal of all 25 players on the playoff squad 

was winning the World Series, rather than chasing individual glory; 

Whereas these players have been awarded a variety of honors, 

including the Most Valuable Player Award, the Cy Young 

Award, the Gold Glove Award, the Silver Slugger Award, 

the Rookie of the Year Award, and the opportunity to appear in All-Star games; 

Whereas the St. Louis Cardinals have a history of great players, including Bob Gibson, Lou Brock, Ozzie Smith, Curt 

Flood, Willie McGee, and Stan Musial; 

Whereas St. Louis has a wonderful baseball tradition because 

Cardinals fans have faithfully supported their team; and 

Whereas the San Diego Padres, the New York Mets, and the 

Detroit Tigers proved worthy and honorable opponents 

during the post-season: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

(1) congratulates the St. Louis Cardinals on winning the 2006 World Series; and 

(2) commends the players, coaches, management, 

and all other personnel of the St. Louis Cardinals, as 

well as the fans, on this great victory. 

Attest:

Clerk.
#### State of Connecticut *v.*Dominic Bruno

*Ronald E. Cassidento,*in support of the petition.

*Linda N. Knight,*deputy assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.

Decided May 23, 1984

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 1 Conn. App. 384, is granted.
1

 Plaintiff styled her motion as “Micki Beth Stiller, Attorney for Barbara B. Freeman v.

Astrue.” However, in the first sentence of the motion, she states that “Plaintiff hereby applies for

attorney fees[.]” Thus, it is clear that the plaintiff is the applicant for EAJA fees.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

BARBARA B. FREEMAN, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:06cv794-SRW

)

MICHAEL ASTRUE, )

Commissioner of Social Security, )

)

Defendant. )

ORDER

Upon consideration of plaintiff's1 petition for attorney fees, filed November 30, 2007,

it is

ORDERED that defendant is DIRECTED to respond to the application on or before

December 18, 2007. If the Commissioner objects to any item of fees claimed by plaintiff,

the Commissioner must specify the item and the reason for his objection. 

Done, this 5th day of December, 2007.

/s/ Susan Russ Walker 

SUSAN RUSS WALKER

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-00794-SRW Document 18 Filed 12/05/2007 Page 1 of 1
EX-35 (b)
(logo) AVELO
       MORTGAGE


Avelo Mortgage,

Annual Compliance Statement


Re: The Flow Servicing Agreement dated as of January 1, 2006 (the "Agreement"),
among Goldman Sachs Mortgage Company and Avelo Mortgage, LLC and GSAA Home
Equity Trust 2006-16


1. A review has been completed of Avelo Mortgage, LLC's ("Avelo") servicing
activities and its performance under the servicing agreement during the period
from February 24, 2006 through December 31, 2006. This review was completed
under my supervision.

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, Avelo has fulfilled all of
its obligations under the agreement in all material respects, except as
described in the item below:

For a period of time in 2006, bank accounts were not reconciled in strict
compliance with Section 1122(d)(2)(vii) of Reg AB which provides as follows:

*  Reconciliations are prepared on a monthly basis for all asset-backed
   securities, related bank accounts, including custodial accounts and related
   bank clearing accounts. These reconciliations are (A) mathematically
   accurate; (B) prepared within 30 calendar days after the bank statement
   cutoff date, or such other number of days specified in the transaction
   agreements; (C) reviewed and approved by someone other than the person who
   prepared the reconciliation; and (D) contain explanations for reconciling
   items. These reconciling items are resolved within 90 calendar days of their
   original identification, or such other number of days specified in the
   transaction agreements.


The bank account reconciliations were current as of December 31, 2006, and no
issues were found or arose from the delay in reconciling the bank accounts.

I certify this information to be true and correct to the best of my ability.


/s/ James Weston Moffett
Name:  James Weston Moffett
Title: President and CEO
Date:  February 28, 2007


600 E. Las Colinas Blvd.  Suite 620  Irving, TX 75039  972.910.7000
F. 972.910.7099
### EPA Form 5900

- 84 OMB No. 2060

- 0336, Approval Expires 0 6 /30/201 5



### Federal Operating Permit Program (40 CFR Part 71)

EMISSION CALCULA TIONS (EMISS)

Calculate potential to emit (PTE) for applicability purposes and actual emissions for fee purposes for

each emissions unit, control device, or alternative operating scenario identified in section I of form GIS

. If form FEE does not need to be submitted with the application, do not calculate actual emissions.

A. Emissions Unit ID

__ EGEN 1

_____

B. Identification and Quantification of Emissions

First, list each air pollutant that is either regulated at the unit or present in major amounts , then list any other

regulated pollutant (for fee calculation) not already listed. HAP may be simply listed as "HAP." Next,

calculate PTE for applicability purposes and actual emissions for fee purposes for each pollutant. Do not

calculate PTE for air pollutants listed solely for fee purposes. Include all fugitives for fee purposes

. 

### You may

round to the nearest tenth of a ton for yearly values or tenth of a pound for hourly values.

Air Pollutants Emission Rates

CAS No. Actual

Annual

Emissions

(tons/yr) Potential to Emit

Hourly

(lb/hr) Annual

(tons/yr)

CO 0.38 0.09 5

VOM 0.14 0.035

NOx 1.76 0.441

PM2.5 0.12 0.031

PM10 0.12 0.03 1

Part 0.12 0.03 1

SOx 0.116 0.029

HAP 0.0305 0.0071