alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Amended and Restated Director's Retirement Policy



 Exhibit 10.6 
 Board of Directors 
 Retirement Policy

 of The Walt Disney Company 
  

					
	 History:
	  	The Board of Directors adopted a retirement policy on May 28, 1974 as recommended to it by the Executive Committee; it was revised in November 1983 by the Board
of Directors upon the recommendation of the Corporate Governance Committee; was further revised on June 23, 1997 by the Compensation Committee; was further revised on November 28, 2006 by the Board of Directors upon the recommendation of
the Governance and Nominating Committee; and was further revised on December 2, 2009 by the Board of Directors upon the recommendation of the Governance and Nominating Committee.
			
	Policy:	  		  	
		
	 1.
	  	That no Director may stand for reelection following the calendar year in which that Director turned 74 years of age.
		
	 2.
	  	That each of those Directors who retire in accordance with the policy set forth in paragraph 1 above be elected a Director Emeritus.
		
	 3.
	  	That Directors Emeritus who retire after June 23, 1997, no longer be privileged to attend Board meetings or to serve on Board Committees but shall continue to be
invited to social events such as movie openings, theme park anniversaries, etc., to which all then current Directors are invited.
		
	 4.
	  	That all accruals of future retirement benefits for Directors retiring after June 23, 1997 (including Directors Emeritus), be terminated, effective from
December 31, 1994, and for all periods thereafter (the “Accrual Termination Date”).
		
	 5.
	  	That upon retirement (regardless of whether or not Director Emeritus status has been reached) each Director who has served five or more years as of the Accrual
Termination Date shall receive annual retirement benefits for the same number of years that such Director has actively served on the Board, calculated as follows:
			
		  	(a)	  	for retired Directors with ten years or more of active Board service accrued through the Accrual Termination Date, the same yearly retainer as paid to active non-management
Directors;
			
		  	(b)	  	for retired Directors with five through nine years of active Board service accrued through the Accrual Termination Date, fifty percent (50%) of an active non-management
Director’s yearly retainer plus an additional ten percent (10%) thereof for each year of active Board service in excess of five years.









					
	6.	  	That management Directors are not eligible for retirement benefits for any years that they serve The Walt Disney Company or any of its affiliates in dual roles
(management and director).
		
	7.	  	That any Director Emeritus who has retired prior to June 23, 1997, shall be unaffected by any changes in the Board of Directors Retirement Policy effected on
June 23, 1997, and shall continue to be covered by the Policy as previously in effect.
§ 60.133 Additional design criteria for the underground facility. ( a ) *General criteria for the underground facility.* ( 1 ) The orientation, geometry, layout, and depth of the underground facility, and the design of any engineered barriers that are part of the underground facility shall contribute to the containment and isolation of radionuclides.
( 2 ) The underground facility shall be designed so that the effects of credible disruptive events during the period of operations, such as flooding, fires and explosions, will not spread through the facility.
( b ) *Flexibility of design.* The underground facility shall be designed with sufficient flexibility to allow adjustments where necessary to accommodate specific site conditions identified through in situ monitoring, testing, or excavation.
( c ) *Retrieval of waste.* The underground facility shall be designed to permit retrieval of waste in accordance with the performance objectives of § 60.111.
( d ) *Control of water and gas.* The design of the underground facility shall provide for control of water or gas intrusion.
( e ) *Underground openings.* ( 1 ) Openings in the underground facility shall be designed so that operations can be carried out safely and the retrievability option maintained.
( 2 ) Openings in the underground facility shall be designed to reduce the potential for deleterious rock movement or fracturing of overlying or surrounding rock.
( f ) *Rock excavation.* The design of the underground facility shall incorporate excavation methods that will limit the potential for creating a preferential pathway for groundwater to contact the waste packages or radionuclide migration to the accessible environment.
( g ) *Underground facility ventilation.* The ventilation system shall be designed to: ( 1 ) Control the transport of radioactive particulates and gases within and releases from the underground facility in accordance with the performance objectives of § 60.111(a),
( 2 ) Assure the ability to perform essential safety functions assuming occurrence of design basis events.
( 3 ) Separate the ventilation of excavation and waste emplacement areas.
( h ) *Engineered barriers.* Engineered barriers shall be designed to assist the geologic setting in meeting the performance objectives for the period following permanent closure.
( i ) *Thermal loads.* The underground facility shall be designed so that the performance objectives will be met taking into account the predicted thermal and thermomechanical response of the host rock, and surrounding strata, groundwater system.
[48 FR 28222, June 21, 1983, as amended at 50 FR 29648, July 22, 1985; 61 FR 64270, Dec. 4, 1996]
March 17, 2015

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

ARBOR WINDSOR COURT, LTD., Appellant

NO. 14-13-00480-CV V.

WEEKLEY HOMES, LP, Appellee

________________________________

This cause, an appeal from the judgment in favor of appellee, Weekley 

Homes, LP, signed May 7, 2013, was heard on the transcript of the record. We 

have inspected the record and find no error in the judgment. We order the 

judgment of the court below AFFIRMED.

We order appellant, Arbor Windsor Court, Ltd., to pay all costs incurred in 

this appeal. 

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
**Exhibit 32.2**

**Certification of Chief financial Officer Under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

The undersigned officer of First National Lincoln Corporation (the "Company") hereby certifies that the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2006 to which this certification is being furnished as an exhibit (the "Report"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. This certification is provided pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K ("Item 601(b)(32)") promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"), and the Exchange Act. In accordance with clause (ii) of Item 601(b)(32), thiscertification (A) shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and (B) shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.

 

Date: May 10, 2006

 

/s/ F. Stephen Ward

F. Stephen Ward

Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer

First National Lincoln Corporation

 

 

Page 1
§ 205.83 Contents. ( a ) The request shall contain a full and complete statement of all relevant facts pertaining to the circumstances, act or transaction that is the subject of the request and to the DOE action sought. Such facts shall include the names and addresses of all affected persons (if reasonably ascertainable) and a full discussion of the pertinent provisions and relevant facts contained in the documents submitted with the request. Copies of all relevant contracts, agreements, leases, instruments, and other documents shall be submitted with the request. When the request pertains to only one step of a larger integrated transaction, the facts, circumstances, and other relevant information pertaining to the entire transaction must be submitted.
( b ) The request for interpretation shall include a discussion of all relevant authorities, including, but not limited to, DOE rulings, regulations, interpretations and decisions on appeals and exceptions relied upon to support the particular interpretation sought therein.
H. Res. 1019 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

July 24, 2018. 

Resolved, That the conference report accompanying H.R. 

5515, to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2019 for 

military activities of the Department of Defense, for military 

construction, and for defense activities of the Department of 

Energy, to prescribe military personnel strengths for such fiscal year, and for other purposes, in the opinion of this House, 

contravenes the first clause of the seventh section of the first 

article of the Constitution of the United States and is an infringement of the privileges of this House and that such bill 

be respectfully recommitted to the committee of conference. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
PGI 208.7004-3 Use of advance MIPRs.

(1) An advance MIPR is an unfunded MIPR provided to the acquiring department in advance of the

funded MIPR so that initial steps in planning the contract action can begin at an earlier date.

(2) In order to use an advance MIPR, the acquiring department and the requiring department must

agree that its use will be beneficial. The departments may execute a blanket agreement to use

advance MIPRs.

(3) The requiring department shall not release an advance MIPR to the acquiring department

without obtaining proper internal approval of the requirement.

(4) When advance MIPRs are used, mark “ADVANCE MIPR” prominently on the DD Form 448.

(5) For urgent requirements, the advance MIPR may be transmitted electronically.

(6) On the basis of an advance MIPR, the acquiring department may take the initial steps toward

awarding a contract, such as obtaining internal coordination and preparing an acquisition plan.

Acquiring departments may determine the extent of these initial actions but shall not award

contracts on the basis of advance MIPRs.

Parent topic: PGI 208.7004 Procedures.
#### State of Kansas, *Appellee,*v. Anderson Arthur Scheley, Ronnie Louis Kelly, *Appellants.*

No. 47,887

Opinion filed January 24, 1976.

*Hosea Ellis Sowell,*of Kansas City, Kansas, was on the brief for the appellants.

*Curt T. Schneider,*attorney general, *Nick A. Tomasic,*district attorney, and *Dennis L. Harris,*assistant district attorney, were on the brief for the appellee.

*Per Curiam:*

Affirmed.
#### § 600.310 Purpose of financial and program management.

Sections 600.311 through 600.318 prescribe standards for financial management systems; methods for making payments; and rules for cost sharing and matching, program income, revisions to budgets and program plans, audits, allowable costs, and fee and profit.
Editorial Note on Part 55
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 55 appear at 80 FR 74980, Dec. 1, 2015.

§ 55.35 Re-applications. ( a ) An applicant whose application for a license has been denied because of failure to pass the written examination or operating test, or both, may file a new application two months after the date of denial. The application must be submitted on Form NRC-398 and include a statement signed by an authorized representative of the facility licensee by whom the applicant will be employed that states in detail the extent of the applicant's additional training since the denial and certifies that the applicant is ready for re-examination. An applicant may file a third application six months after the date of denial of the second application, and may file further successive applications two years after the date of denial of each prior application. The applicant shall submit each successive application on Form NRC-398 and include a statement of additional training.
( b ) An applicant who has passed either the written examination or operating test and failed the other may request in a new application on Form NRC-398 to be excused from re-examination on the portions of the examination or test which the applicant has passed. The Commission may in its discretion grant the request, if it determines that sufficient justification is presented.
Exhibit 35.1



|     |  |  |  |                                                                                                                        
|---- |  |  |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|LOGO |  |  |  | Corporate Trust Services 
MAC R1204-010 9062 Old
Annapolis Road Columbia, MD 21045 
Tel: 410 884 2000 Fax: 410 715 2380

Citibank, National Association

388 Greenwich Street

14th Floor

New York, New York 10013



|Re: | Annual Statement of Compliance for Sequoia Mortgage Trust 2013-2 Mortgage Pass- Through Certificates, Series 2013-2
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Per the Amended and Restated Servicing Agreement dated as of January 1, 2014 (the Agreement), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Master Servicer (Wells Fargo), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2016 (the Reporting Period):

(a) A review of Wells Fargos activities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under such
officers supervision; and

(b) To the best of such officers knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of
its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

March 1, 2017



|              
|--------------
|LOGO          
|Kristen Cronin
|Vice President



|                       |  |     
|---------------------- |  | ----
|Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. |  | LOGO
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 376 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 376

 Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the Federal 
 Trade Commission should investigate the publication of the video game 
    ``Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas'' to determine if the publisher 
  intentionally deceived the Entertainment Software Ratings Board to 
                    avoid an ``Adults-Only'' rating.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 22, 2005

    Mr. Upton (for himself and Mr. Markey) submitted the following 
 resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the Federal 
 Trade Commission should investigate the publication of the video game 
    ``Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas'' to determine if the publisher 
  intentionally deceived the Entertainment Software Ratings Board to 
                    avoid an ``Adults-Only'' rating.

Whereas the video game ``Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas'' was given a rating of 
        ``Mature'' by the Entertainment Software Ratings Board;
Whereas the game contains sexually explicit content that is accessible by 
        consumers but that appears to have been hidden from the ratings board in 
        order to avoid the game receiving an ``Adults Only'' rating;
Whereas the Entertainment Software Ratings Board took swift action in 
        investigating the matter and revoked the ``Mature'' rating, ensuring any 
        future sales of ``Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas'' will be under an 
        ``Adults Only'' rating; and
Whereas the publisher of the video game, Rockstar Games, may have intentionally 
        deceived the ratings board and consumers: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives 
that--
            (1) the Federal Trade Commission should investigate the 
        publication of the video game ``Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas'' 
        to determine if the publisher, Rockstar Games, intentionally 
        deceived the Entertainment Software Ratings Board to avoid an 
        ``Adults-Only'' rating; and
            (2) if the Commission determines Rockstar Games to have 
        committed such deception or fraud, the Commission should apply 
        the toughest of penalties.
                                 <all>
```
829.000 Scope of part.       This part states the policies and procedures for the following:          (a) Exemptions of alcohol products purchased for use by the VA medical care program from Federal excise taxes.          (b) Specified refund procedures for State and local taxes.    **Parent topic:** PART 829 - TAXES
Exhibit 35.1



|     |                         |                         
|---- | ----------------------- | ------------------------
|LOGO |                         | Corporate Trust Services
|     | MAC R1204-010          
|     | 9062 Old Annapolis Road
|     | Columbia, MD 21045     
|     |                        
|     |                         | Tel: 410 884 2000       
|     |                         | Fax: 410 715 2380       

Citibank, N.A.

388 Greenwich
Street

14th Floor

New York, New York 10013



|RE: | Annual Statement of Compliance for Sequoia Mortgage Trust 2013-1 Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2013-1
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Per the Amended and Restated Pooling and Servicing dated as of January 1, 2014 (the Agreement), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Master Servicer (Wells Fargo), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2014 (the Reporting Period):

(a) A review of Wells Fargos activities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under such
officers supervision; and

(b) To the best of such officers knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of
its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.



|                  
|------------------
|February 24, 2015 
|                  
|/s/ Kristen Cronin
|Kristen Cronin    
|Vice President    



|                       |  |     
|---------------------- |  | ----
|Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. |  | LOGO
# PGI 239.7603 Procedures.

- PGI 239.7603-1 General. 
- PGI 239.7603-2 Notification of third party access requests. 
- PGI 239.7603-3 Cyber incident and compromise reporting. 
- PGI 239.7603-4 DoD damage assessment activities. 

**Parent topic:**PGI 239.76 -CLOUD COMPUTING
§ 52.43 Relationship to other subparts. ( a ) This subpart applies to a person that requests a standard design certification from the NRC separately from an application for a combined license filed under subpart C of this part for a nuclear power facility. An applicant for a combined license may reference a standard design certification.
( b ) Subpart E of this part governs the NRC staff review and approval of a standard design. Subpart E may be used independently of the provisions in this subpart.
( c ) Subpart F of this part governs the issuance of licenses to manufacture nuclear power reactors to be installed and operated at sites not identified in the manufacturing license application. Subpart F may be used independently of the provisions in this subpart. However, an applicant for a manufacturing license under subpart F may reference a design certification.
[72 FR 49517, Aug. 28, 2007, as amended at 84 FR 63568, Nov. 18, 2019]
#### WESTCHESTER INVESTING CO., Respondent, v. NEW YORK CENT. & H. R. R. CO., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

November 13, 1914.)

*1118Action by the Westchester Investing Company against the New York Central & Hudson River Railroad Company.

PER CURIAM.

The defendant has whatever land Hobby conveyed to its lessor, excluding the land in controversy. As its center line is fixed, and it owns 30 feet easterly of it, and as plaintiff’s northwest corner was made by the same grantor to begin in the adjoining land of the railroad company, there seems no serious difficulty in determining the boundary line between the parties, and that plaintiff owns the land in question, as it is easterly of the 30 feet of land which lies east of defendant’s center line. Judgment and order of the County Court of Westchester county affirmed, with costs.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**Certification of Chief Executive Officer Under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

The undersigned officer of The First Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company") hereby certifies that the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009 to which this certification is being furnished as an exhibit (the "Report"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. This certification is provided pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K ("Item 601(b)(32)") promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"), and the Exchange Act. In accordance with clause (ii) of Item 601(b)(32), thiscertification (A) shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and (B) shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.

 

Date: October 22, 2009

 

/s/ Daniel R. Daigneault

Daniel R. Daigneault

President & Chief Executive Officer

The First Bancorp, Inc.
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15**  **- 1695** 

ROBERT W. HARRIS , Plaintiff

– Appellant ,

v. PATRICK R. DONAHOE, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service , Defendant

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Richmond

. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. ( 3:14

- cv - 00427

- REP )

Submitted : November 24, 2015 Decided: December 22, 2015

Before WILKINSON and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges , and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

. Robert W. Harris, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth Wu, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Robert W. Harris appeals the district court’s order dismissing this action alleging employment discrimination for failure to state a claim, Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). After de novo review, see Bell Atl. Corp. v. Two mbly , 550 U.S. 544, 555 (2007), we conclude that dismissal was proper. Even with a liberal construction of the complaint, we find that Harris’ unintelligible factual allegations were insufficient to give rise to an inference of liability and that his clai ms for relief were largely unintelligible. See Ashcroft v. Iqbal , 556 U.S. 662, 679 (2009); Giarrantano v. Johnson , 521 F.3d 298, 302 (4th Cir. 2015). We accordingly affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adeq uately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED