alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 138 (Tuesday, July 19, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 42709]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-18308]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Notice

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.

DATE AND TIME: Tuesday, July 26, 2011, 9:30 a.m. Eastern Time.

PLACE: Commission Meeting Room on the First Floor of the EEOC Office 
Building, 131 ``M'' Street, NE., Washington, DC 20507.

STATUS: The meeting will be open to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

Open Session

    1. Announcement of Notation Votes, and
    2. Arrest and Conviction Records as a Barrier to Employment.

    Note:  In accordance with the Sunshine Act, the meeting will be 
open to public observation of the Commission's deliberations and 
voting. Seating is limited and it is suggested that visitors arrive 
30 minutes before the meeting in order to be processed through 
security and escorted to the meeting room. (In addition to 
publishing notices on EEOC Commission meetings in the Federal 
Register, the Commission also provides information about Commission 
meetings on its Web site, http://eeoc.gov., and provides a recorded 
announcement a week in advance on future Commission sessions.)

    Please telephone (202) 663-7100 (voice) and (202) 663-4074 (TTY) at 
any time for information on these meetings. The EEOC provides sign 
language interpretation and Communication Access Realtime Translation 
(CART) services at Commission meetings for the hearing impaired. 
Requests for other reasonable accommodations may be made by using the 
voice and TTY numbers listed above.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Stephen Llewellyn, Executive 
Officer on (202) 663-4070.

    Dated: July 15, 2011.
 Stephen Llewellyn,
Executive Officer, Executive Secretariat.
[FR Doc. 2011-18308 Filed 7-15-11; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6570-01-P
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5                       
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998                  
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998            
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998                                
<CASH>                                     1,485                  
<SECURITIES>                               0                  
<RECEIVABLES>                              1,138                  
<ALLOWANCES>                               (78)                 
<INVENTORY>                                1,167                   
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           4,039                  
<PP&E>                                     4,146                  
<DEPRECIATION>                             (2,979)                  
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             5,244                  
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                      1,624                  
<BONDS>                                    0                  
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      0                  
<PREFERRED>                                4,520                  
<COMMON>                                   19                        
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,324)                 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               5,244                  
<SALES>                                    1,202                  
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           1,211                  
<CGS>                                      1,543                  
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              1,543                  
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                           2,402                  
<LOSS-PROVISION>                           0                  
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         7                  
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,933)                 
<INCOME-TAX>                               0                  
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        0                  
<DISCONTINUED>                             0                  
<EXTRAORDINARY>                            0                  
<CHANGES>                                  0                  
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,933)                 
<EPS-PRIMARY>                              (.16)                 
<EPS-DILUTED>                              0                  
                                

</TABLE>
CIVIL AVIATION BUREAU

MINISTRY OF LAND, INFRASTRUCTURE, 

TRANSPORT AND TOURISM

2-1-3, Kasumigaseki, Chiyoda-ku

Tokyo, 100-8918, JAPAN

TEL: +81-3-5253-8707, FAX: +81-3-5253-1656

September 6, 2011

Nippon Cargo Airlines Co., Ltd

Business Strategy & International Affairs

Second International Section

Aviation Industry Division

Aviation Network Department

Civil Aviation Bureau

Ministry of Land Infrastructure Transport and Tourism

Approval cases of 3rd countries charter operation by USA carriers

Attached list shows the result of approval cases toward USA carriers’ application for the 3rd

countries charter operation since April 2011.
Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA- Directorate Identifier: 2011-CE-016-AD

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If 

they do not, click (or Tab) into and then out of the changed cell.

Estimated Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Do not include oncondition costs here

Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, 

propeller, appliance)

Work-hours

(include 

access, testing, 

and close-up)

Labor 

cost 

(@$85/h

our)

Parts Cost Total Costs 

(labor + 

parts)

Number of 

U.S. 

Registered

Products

Total Cost 

for U.S. Fleet

Inspection 12.0 $1,020.0

0

$0 $1,020.00 3,100 $3,162,000.0

0

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

The known number of products in compliance:

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $3,162,000

Costs covered under warranty (if known) $

On-Condition Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Work-hours

(include access, 

testing, and closeup)

Labor cost 

(@$85/hour)

Parts Cost Cost per Product

Replacement 12.0 $1,020.00 $572 $1,592.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table 

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs):
Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? 

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

either a Yes or No answer.

YES NO 

Explanation: 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

YES* NO 

*Explanation:
§ 601.500 Secretary of Defense. ( a ) The Secretary of Defense may exempt, on a case-by-case basis, a covered Federal action from the prohibition whenever the Secretary determines, in writing, that such an exemption is in the national interest. The Secretary shall transmit a copy of each such written exemption to Congress immediately after making such a determination.
( b ) The Department of Defense may issue supplemental regulations to implement paragraph (a) of this section.
2007-1819.

#### Louden v. A.W. Chesterton Co.

Cuyahoga App. No. 90184.

Pfeifer and Lanzinger, JJ., dissent.
#### McMASTER v. FLORENCE PARK REALTY CO.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

June 5, 1914.)

Action by Angus McMaster against the Florence Park. Realty Company.

No opinion. Application denied, with $10 costs. Order signed.
#### § 21.31 Procurement documents.

Each individual, corporation, partnership, dedicating entity, or other entity subject to the regulations in this part shall ensure that each procurement document for a facility, or a basic component issued by him, her or it on or after January 6, 1978, specifies, when applicable, that the provisions of 10 CFR part 21 apply.

[60 FR 48374, Sept. 19, 1995]
Exhibit 32.1

              CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63
                      OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE

      In connection with the quarterly report of Simclar, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Barry J. Pardon,
President of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for
purpose of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to
the best of my knowledge:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

      This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, "filed" with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.



                                /s/ Barry J. Pardon
                                ------------------------------------
                                Barry J. Pardon, President
                                Simclar, Inc.
                                August 16, 2004
P.1 

OAR Box 1850 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

73) IV-B-3 

Docket Number: 

A-90-07 

Printed 11/18/2008 11:09:28 AM Sheet 73 of 161 
P.2 

3-j _ *>f. 

VS5B 

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

^ 

ANN ARBOR. MICHIGAN 48105 

APR 2 6 W94 

(5?JJXO 

OFFICE OF 

AIR ANO RADIATION 

•'"•Y ;»(994 

MEMORANDUM 

SUBJECT: 

FROM: 

U 

'} MX DOCKET 

THRU: 

TO: 

List of Data Bases A 

Ines del C. Figueroa, (Environmental Scientist 

Special Regulatory Projects Branch 

Judith Gray, Senior Project Manager CLui^t^^/r^i 

Special Regulatory Projects Branch J fl / 

Docket No. A-90-07 ' 

The fuels and fuel additives registration program requires 

manufacturers to conduct a comprehensive literature search for 

available information on the health and welfare effects of their 

products' emissions. The literature search must include the 

results of searching appropriate chemical, toxicological, and 

environmental data bases. A table containing an example list of 

available online/computer data bases is attached. 
P.3 

'K * 

Onlina/Computar 

Data Bas* 

Biosia Preview 

NTIS (National 

Technical Information 

Service 

Enviroline 

Medline 

Toxline 

CAS Online 

Merck Index Online 

SPHERE (Scientific 

Parameters in Health 

and Environment; 

Retrieval and 

Estimation) 

IRIS (Integrated Riak 

Information System) 

Toxnet (includes HSDB, 

RTECS, CCRIS, DBIR, 

etc.) 

Embase 

AQUIRE (Aquatic 

Toxicity Information 

Retrieval System 

Compendex 

Envirofate 

TAP (Toxicity Activity 

Profiles) 

EPA/IARC SAP (Genetic 

Activity Profiles) 

Data Bas* Possible Sourcas1 

BRS Search Service, 

Dialog Information Services, 

Data-Star 

Dialog Information services, 

BRS Search Service, 

ORBIT Search Service, 

Data-Star, 

STN International 

Dialog Information Services, 

ORBIT Search Service 

MEDLARS (from National Library 

of Medicine), 

BRS Search Service, 

Dialog Information Services 

MEDLARS (from National Library 

of Medicine), 

Dialog Information Services 

STN International, 

Dialog Information Services 

CIS 

Dialog Information Services 

CIS/EPA 

EPA 

MEDLARS (from National Library 

of Medicine) 

Dialog Information Services 

EPA 

BRS Search Service, 

ORBIT Search Service, 

STN International, 

Dialog Information Services 

Dialog Information Services, 

ORBIT Search Service 

EPA 

EPA 

Corresponding Print Sourc* 

Biological Abstracts 

Government Reports 

Announcements and Index 

Environmental Abstracts, 

Environmental Index/Abstract's 

Annual 

Index Medicus 

Chem Abstracts 

Merck Index 

Excerpta Medica 

Engineering Index 

Environmental Abstracts, 

Environment Index/Abstracts Annual 

Hazardous Air Pollutants: 

Profiles of Noncancer Toxicity 

Information from Inhalation 

Exposures (EPA/600/R-93/142) 

IARC Monographs 

1 Mention of trade names or commercial products does not 

constitute EPA's endorsement or recommendation for use.
#### § 600.353 Disputes and appeals.

Consistent with 10 CFR 600.22 and part 1024, recipients have the right to appeal certain decisions by contracting officers.
PGI 217.202 Use of options.

(1) Options may be used for foreign military sales (FMS) requirements.

(2) For sole source major systems for U.S. and U.S./FMS combined procurements, contracting

officers, in coordination with program managers, are encouraged to—

(i) Establish priced options for two years beyond the base year, so that negotiations of major systems

will be conducted approximately every three years; and

(ii) In those cases where exact quantities are subject to variation, or FMS customers are not yet

identified, establish range option pricing for both U.S. and FMS quantities.

(3) Consider use of surge options to support industrial capability. A surge option allows the

Government, prior to final delivery, to—

(i) Accelerate the contractor's production rate in accordance with a surge production plan or a

delivery schedule provided by the contractor under the terms of the contract; and

(ii) Purchase additional quantities of supplies or services.

(4) See DFARS Subpart 217.74 for limitations on the use of undefinitized options.

Parent topic: PGI 217.2 -OPTIONS
#### § 590.407 Reports of changes.

Any person authorized to import or export natural gas has a continuing obligation to give the Assistant Secretary written notification, as soon as practicable, of any prospective or actual changes to the information submitted during the application process upon which the authorization was based, including, but not limited to, changes to: The parties involved in the import or export arrangement, the terms and conditions of any applicable contracts, the place of entry or exit, the transporters, the volumes accepted or offered, or the import or export price. Any notification filed under this section shall contain the FE docket number(s) to which it relates. Compliance with this section does not relieve an importer or exporter from responsibility to file the appropriate application to amend a previous import or export authorization under this part whenever such changes are contrary to or otherwise not permitted by the existing authorization.
PART 18 – EMERGENCY ACQUISITIONS       SUBPART 18.2 – EMERGENCY ACQUISITION FLEXIBILITIES                                                         18.270 Head of contracting activity determinations.    SUBPART 18.2 – EMERGENCY ACQUISITION FLEXIBILITIES     18.270 Head of contracting activity determinations.    The DLA Acquisition Director has delegated authority to the contracting officer to make the determinations at—       (a) 18.201(b) and (c);       (b) 18.202(a)-(d); and       (c) 18.204(b).
PGI Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation

PGI Part 213 - SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITIONPROCEDURES

PGI Part 215 - CONTRACTING BY NEGOTIATION

PGI Part 216 - TYPES OF CONTRACTS

PGI Part 217 - SPECIAL CONTRACTING METHODS

PGI Part 218 - EMERGENCY ACQUISITIONS

Parent topic: PGI Subchapter C - CONTRACTING METHODS AND CONTRACT TYPES
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 245 (Wednesday, December 22, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 80486-80487]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-32064]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER11-2354-000]


Sustainable Star, LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial Market-
Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 
Authorization

December 15, 2010.
    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of 
Sustainable Star, LLC's application for market-based rate authority, 
with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such application includes 
a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR part 34, of future 
issuances of securities and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., 
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the 
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 
385.214). Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a 
copy of that document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with 
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18 
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of 
liability, is January 4, 2011.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet 
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an 
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the 
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the 
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in 
the

[[Page 80487]]

Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in the 
above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link 
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification 
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with 
any FERC Online service, please e-mail <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#85c3c0d7c6caebe9ecebe0d6f0f5f5eaf7f1c5e3e0f7e6abe2eaf3"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="084e4d5a4b47666461666d5b7d7878677a7c486e6d7a6b266f677e">[email protected]</span></a>. or 
call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-32064 Filed 12-21-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Richard O’Dell, Appellant.

Staley, Jr., J.

Appeal from an order of the County Court of Cortland County, entered July 23, 1969, denying a *coram nobis*petition without a hearing. Appellant and Marjory Williams were ,by indictment charged with manslaughter in the second degree (Penal Law, § 125.15), and criminally negligent homicide (Penal Law, § 125.10). The indictment arose out of an automobile accident on February 2, 1968, which resulted in the death of two other persons. At the time of the accident, appellant was a passenger in his own automobile which was being operated by Marjory Williams. Appellant was brought to trial on May 7, 1968. The jury acquitted him on the charge of manslaughter in the second egree, but found him guilty on the charge of criminally negligent homicide. Appellant filed a notice of appeal from the judgment of conviction on July 16, 1968, but the appeal was not prosecuted. Marjory Williams was brought to trial in the month of October, 1968, and was *857acquitted by the jury on both counts of the indictment. By petition dated May 26, 1969, and an amendment thereto dated June 19, 1969, appellant applied to the County Court of Cortland County for a writ of error *coram nobis,*whereby he sought to set aside the judgment of conviction and sentence on the ground that if Marjory Williams was not guilty of criminally negligent homicide, he, as the passenger in the automobile, could not possibly be guilty of criminally negligent homicide for permitting her to drive his automobile. The County Court dismissed the petition on the ground that appellant’s contention had no merit, reasoning that since under subdivision 2 of section 20.05 of the Penal Law, the acquittal of the codefendant would not have been available to appellant as a defense had he been tried subsequent to the codefendant, it could not now be presented as a basis for setting aside his judgment of conviction. We agree with this conclusion. (Penal Law, §§ 20.00, 20.05, subd. 2; cf. *Plunkett*v. *Heath,*1 N. Y. S. 2d 778.) The codefendant’s acquittal would not establish or prove appellant’s innocence of the charge in the indictment. *(People ex rel. Guido*v. *Calkins,*9 N Y 2d 77; *People*v. *Kief,*126 N. Y. 661.) Further, the bill of particulars served by the District Attorney specified the alleged criminal conduct on the part of appellant was not only the reckless operation of the automobile, but also that he permitted the automobile to be operated on a public highway knowing that the brakes or steering mechanism of the automobile were defective and in an unsafe condition. Thus, it would not be illogical or inconsistent for a jury to convict appellant and acquit his eodefendant. Order affirmed, without costs. Reynolds, J. P., Staley, Jr., Greenblott, Cooke and Sweeney, JJ., concur in memorandum by Staley, Jr., J.