alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 51
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 51 appear at 80 FR 74980, Dec. 1, 2015.

§ 51.26 Requirement to publish notice of intent and conduct scoping process. ( a ) Whenever the appropriate NRC staff director determines that an environmental impact statement will be prepared by NRC in connection with a proposed action, a notice of intent will be prepared as provided in § 51.27, and will be published in the Federal Register as provided in § 51.116, and an appropriate scoping process (see §§ 51.27, 51.28, and 51.29) will be conducted.
( b ) The scoping process may include a public scoping meeting.
( c ) Upon receipt of an application and accompanying environmental impact statement under § 60.22 or § 63.22 of this chapter (pertaining to geologic repositories for high-level radioactive waste), the appropriate NRC staff director will include in the notice of docketing required to be published by § 2.101(f)(8) of this chapter a statement of Commission intention to adopt the environmental impact statement to the extent practicable. However, if the appropriate NRC staff director determines, at the time of such publication or at any time thereafter, that NRC should prepare a supplemental environmental impact statement in connection with the Commission's action on the license application, the NRC shall follow the procedures set out in paragraph (a) of this section.
( d ) Whenever the appropriate NRC staff director determines that a supplement to an environmental impact statement will be prepared by the NRC, a notice of intent will be prepared as provided in § 51.27, and will be published in the Federal Register as provided in § 51.116. The NRC staff need not conduct a scoping process (see §§ 51.27, 51.28, and 51.29), provided, however, that if scoping is conducted, then the scoping must be directed at matters to be addressed in the supplement. If scoping is conducted in a proceeding for a combined license referencing an early site permit under part 52, then the scoping must be directed at matters to be addressed in the supplement as described in § 51.92(e).
[49 FR 9381, Mar. 12, 1984, as amended at 54 FR 27870, July 3, 1989; 66 FR 55791, Nov. 2, 2001; 72 FR 49510, Aug. 28, 2007]
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Gregory R. (Anonymous), Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County, rendered September 18, 1968, which adjudicated him a youthful offender, after a nonjury trial, and committed him to a reformatory term. Judgment reversed, on the law and the facts, and youthful offender information dismissed. In our view, the People failed to prove defendant guilty of acts which would constitute burglary and larceny beyond a reasonable doubt and, accordingly, the adjudication cannot be sustained. The People’s evidence was primarily circumstantial in nature and wholly insufficient to establish defendant’s participation in the crime to a moral certainty (see *People*v. *Cleague,*22 N Y 2d 363). Even if we were not dismissing the information, a new trial before a jury would have had to be held as defendant was unconstitutionally required to consent to a trial without a jury in order to qualify for youthful offender treatment *(People*v. *Michael A. C. [Anony*mous], 32 A D 2d 554). Christ, P. J., Latham, Kleinfeld, Brennan and Benjamin, JJ., concur.
**MINERAL COUNTY**

**HAWTHORNE AIRPORT - HTH**

**MINERAL COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY SHELLEY HARTMAN**  **9299471820000 88-0505497** **MINERAL COUNTY ECON DEV AUTHORITY NATIONS INVESTMENT COMPANY**  **HIGH SIERRA AIRLINES FIRST IN FLIGHT**  **OCEAN HELICOPTER U.S. CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT: NV02**  **XX**

**XX XX** **MAINTENANCE REPAIR OPERATION (MRO)**

**XX XX**  **XX XX**  **XX XX** 
**XX XX**  **XX XX**  **XX XX** **$500,000 $500,000**  **$25,000 $25,000**  **$525,000 XX**  **XX XX** **XX**

**XX**
§ 600.244 Termination for convenience. Except as provided in § 600.443 awards may be terminated in whole or in part only as follows: ( a ) By the awarding agency with the consent of the grantee or subgrantee in which case the two parties shall agree upon the termination conditions, including the effective date and in the case of partial termination, the portion to be terminated, or
( b ) By the grantee or subgrantee upon written notification to the awarding agency, setting forth the reasons for such termination, the effective date, and in the case of partial termination, the portion to be terminated. However, if, in the case of a partial termination, the awarding agency determines that the remaining portion of the award will not accomplish the purposes for which the award was made, the awarding agency may terminate the award in its entirety under either § 600.243 or paragraph (a) of this section.
[53 FR 8045, 8087, Mar. 11, 1988. Redesignated at 59 FR 53264, Oct. 21, 1994, as amended at 61 FR 7166, Feb. 26, 1996] After-the-Grant Requirements
#### Awards.com et al., Appellants, v Kinko’s, Inc., et al., Respondents, et al., Defendant.

Submitted October 22, 2007;

decided January 15, 2008

Reported below, 42 AD3d 178.

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.
229 So.2d 111

#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Oris ARDOIN v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, et al.

No. 50259.

Dec. 18, 1969.

In re: Oris Ardoin applying for writ of habeas corpus.

Writ granted.

ORDER

The petition of relator in the above entitled and numbered cause having been duly considered:

It is ordered that this case be fixed for oral argument before this Court on Thursday, February 26, 1970, at 11:00 A.M.;

It is further ordered that the Honorable Judge of the Thirteenth Judicial District Court, Parish of Evangeline, appoint an attorney-at-law to represent the Relator in the proceeding before this Court and that the Clerk of the Supreme Court be notified of the appointment.

It is further ordered that briefs be filed by counsel for the State and relator in accordance with Rule IX of the Rules of this Court.
PGI 241.1 -GENERAL    **Parent topic:** PGI Part 241 - ACQUISITIONOF UTILITY SERVICESPGI 241.103 Statutory and delegated authority.       Summary of Statutory Authority for Utility/Energy Purchases          Acquisition Type                      Authority                      Maximum Term                         (years)Energy Commodities (purchased as supplies) (natural gas & electricity) *                      10 U.S.C. 3501/                         10 U.S.C. 2829                      5  (4) **Utility Service Contracts (in support of privatization)                      10 U.S.C. 2688(d)(2)                      50Utility Service Contracts ***                         (when not in support of privatization)                      10 U.S.C. 3201-3205                         40 U.S.C. 113(e)(3)                      10* Section 8093 of Public Law 100-202 specifically                            precludes the Federal Government from expending appropriated funds to                            purchase electricity in a manner inconsistent with State law and                            regulation.** 5 years in support of facilities and installations (10 U.S.C. 3501) and 4 years for military family housing (10 U.S.C. 2829).*** GSA has delegated to DoD its authority, under 40 U.S.C. 501(b), to enter into utility service contracts for periods not exceeding 10 years. Absent this authority, the length of DoD utility service contracts in support of facilities and installations would be limited to 5 years (10 U.S.C. 3531) and, for military family housing, would be limited to 4 years (10 U.S.C. 2829).
PGI 225.7902 Defense Trade Cooperation Treaties.       The following documents are accessible at: http://pmddtc.state.gov/:          • DTC Treaties.          • Implementing Arrangements.          •	The provisions of the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR) (22 CFR 126.16 (Australia) and 22 CFR 126.17 (United Kingdom)) pertaining to the DTC Treaties.          •	List of Defense Articles Exempted from DTC Treaty Coverage (also in 22 CFR 126 Supplement No. 1).          • List of Approved Community Members.          • Definitions.    **PGI 225.7902-2 Purpose.****PGI 225.7902-4 Procedures.****Parent topic:** PGI 225.79 - EXPORT CONTROL
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9
<LEGEND>
        This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Form
10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 1998 and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         12,001,249
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               7,700,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    37,276,116
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         48,805,769
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           0
<LOANS>                                        226,807,950
<ALLOWANCE>                                    2,374,454
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 340,982,972
<DEPOSITS>                                     294,964,426
<SHORT-TERM>                                   9,441,323
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            3,858,345
<LONG-TERM>                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       9,126,715
<OTHER-SE>                                     23,523,690
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 340,982,972
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                5,074,452
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              1,347,379
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               61,078
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               6,482,909
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             2,711,950
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             2,808,829
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          3,674,080
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  160,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                2,663,224
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1,556,628
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     1,556,628
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1,085,957
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.30
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.29
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                 4.73
<LOANS-NON>                                    80,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                   208,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                               0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               2,294,000
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  129,000
<RECOVERIES>                                   50,000
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              2,375,000
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           2,135,000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                            0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        240,000
        


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of the Company on
Form 10-K for the period ended June 30, 2015 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), I, Philip L. Hurst, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof,
solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                                         
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.



Date: September 28, 2015



|By:                                          | /s/ Philip L. Hurst | 
|-------------------------------------------- | ------------------- | 
|Name: Philip L. Hurst                        |                    
|Title: President and Chief Executive Officer |
###### Editorial Note on Part 37

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 37 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

#### § 37.101 Form of records.

Each record required by this part must be legible throughout the retention period specified by each Commission regulation. The record may be the original or a reproduced copy or a microform, provided that the copy or microform is authenticated by authorized personnel and that the microform is capable of producing a clear copy throughout the required retention period. The record may also be stored in electronic media with the capability for producing legible, accurate, and complete records during the required retention period. Records such as letters, drawings, and specifications, must include all pertinent information such as stamps, initials, and signatures. The licensee shall maintain adequate safeguards against tampering with and loss of records.
PGI 252.1 -INSTRUCTIONS FOR USING

PROVISIONS AND CLAUSES

Parent topic: PGI Part 252 - CLAUSES

PGI 252.103 Identification of provisions and clauses.

(c) Local provisions and clauses developed by departments and agencies for a single-use intended to

meet the needs of an individual acquisition shall be identified by the title, date, and name of the

department or agency that developed the local clause. For example, if “X” Agency negotiated a

single-use clause for use of special government facilities during discussions, such clause would be

identified in the contract as follows:

“Special Use of Government Facilities (DATE) X Agency”

(d)(1)(A) Local provisions and clauses that will be used on a repetitive basis shall be identified by—

(1) The chapter assigned to the department or agency under Title 48 of the Code of Federal

Regulations (CFR);

(2) FAR subpart “52.2”;

(3) The applicable FAR part;

(4) A four-digit sequential number in the 9000 series for the suffix (see DFARS 252.101(b)(2)(ii)(B));

(5) Title; and

(6) Date.

(B) For example, if “Y” Agency is assigned a CFR chapter number 99, and has developed a provision

regarding an evaluation factor for past performance to be used on a repetitive basis in negotiated

acquisitions, such provision would be identified as follows:

“9952.215-9XXX Past Performance Evaluation Factor (DATE)”
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-7061

RESTONEY ROBINSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus W. DOUGLAS ALBRIGHT, SR.; CARRIE A. MOCK; ROBERT MORGAN, Attorney General; WILLIAM F. BRILEY, Assistant Attorney; DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Highway Division; HERMAN G. ENOCHS, JR., Judge; P. TREVOR SHARP, Judge, Defendants - Appellees.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr., Chief District Judge. (CA-00-187-1) Submitted: December 14, 2000 Decided: December 21, 2000 Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Restoney Robinson, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Restoney Robinson appeals from the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and dismissing without prejudice Robinson’s complaint for failure to comply with a prefiling injunction issued in Robinson v. Frederick , C-88-898-S(M.D.N.C. Oct. 11, 1989). Our review of the record and the district court’s opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Robinson v. Albright , No. CA-00-187-1 (M.D.N.C. June 23, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
OFFICIAL NOTICE FROM COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS

P.O. BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711

5/28/2015 COA No. 02-14-00124-CR

ISBELL, JOHN B. Tr. Ct. No. 1290119D PD-0469-15

The State’s Petition for Discretionary Review has this day been filed. [The Court

requires ten copies of this document to be filed in this office within three (3) days

pursuant to Rule 9.3(b). Failure to send copies will result in the refusal of the

petition.]

Abel Acosta, Clerk

LISA MCMINN

STATE PROSECUTING ATTORNEY

P.O. BOX 13046

AUSTIN, TX 78711

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *OFFICIAL NOTICE FROM COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS

P.O. BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711

5/28/2015 COA No. 02-14-00124-CR

ISBELL, JOHN B. Tr. Ct. No. 1290119D PD-0469-15

The State’s Petition for Discretionary Review has this day been filed. [The Court

requires ten copies of this document to be filed in this office within three (3) days

pursuant to Rule 9.3(b). Failure to send copies will result in the refusal of the

petition.]

Abel Acosta, Clerk

BARRY G. JOHNSON

2821 E. LANCASTER

FT WORTH, TX 76103

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *OFFICIAL NOTICE FROM COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS

P.O. BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711

5/28/2015 COA No. 02-14-00124-CR

ISBELL, JOHN B. Tr. Ct. No. 1290119D PD-0469-15

The State’s Petition for Discretionary Review has this day been filed. [The Court

requires ten copies of this document to be filed in this office within three (3) days

pursuant to Rule 9.3(b). Failure to send copies will result in the refusal of the

petition.]

Abel Acosta, Clerk

2ND COURT OF APPEALS CLERK

DEBRA SPISAK

401 W. BELKNAP, STE 9000

FORT WORTH, TX 76196

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *OFFICIAL NOTICE FROM COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS

P.O. BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711

5/28/2015 COA No. 02-14-00124-CR

ISBELL, JOHN B. Tr. Ct. No. 1290119D PD-0469-15

The State’s Petition for Discretionary Review has this day been filed. [The Court

requires ten copies of this document to be filed in this office within three (3) days

pursuant to Rule 9.3(b). Failure to send copies will result in the refusal of the

petition.]

Abel Acosta, Clerk

C. JAMES GIBSON

ASSISTANT DISTRICT ATTORNEY

401 W. BELKNAP

FORT WORTH, TX 76196

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER TO H ARRIS C OUNTY D ISTRICT C LERK

TO P REPARE

, C ERTIFY

, AND F ILE

S UPPLEMENTAL C LERK ’ S R ECORD

Appellate case name: Andrew Patterson v. Transcontinental Insurance Co.

Appellate case number: 01

- 15

- 00 464

- CV

Trial court case number: 201 3

- 01531

Our complete review of the above

- referenced appeal requires a supplemental clerk’s

record including the following document:

Notice of Appeal filed by the appellant Andrew Patterson on or about May 14, 2015

.

This supplemental clerk’s record is due to be filed in the First Court of Appeals no later

than September 11 , 201 5

.

Judge's signature: /s/ Jane Bland

Jane Bland, a cting individually

Date: August 2 7 , 2015
gss_ex99-1.htm


    


    Account:  
JAI MAHARAJ LTD

                   
DBA SCOTTIES ROCKWALL

    Address: 
2860 Ridge Rd

                   
Rockwall, TX 75032

    Phone:     
972-722-5585

    Contact:  
SAM

     

    


    
      	
               
      

            	
              RE:
      90-day test of Global Smoothie Supply, Inc.'s ("GSS") S-3 Blending
      Equipment and Puree Supply
Agreement

            


    

    


    Gentlemen,

    


    This
letter confirms our agreement regarding your company's test of our S-3 smoothie
blending equipment and puree products as follows:

     

    1.  GSS
will furnish, install, and service the S-3 blending equipment a no cost to
Scotties during the 90 day test period;

    2.  Scotties
will purchase all puree needs from GSS;

    3.  Scotties
is responsible for costs related to the site preparation;

    4.  GSS
will have access to the S-3 blending equipment during business
hours;

    5.  GSS
retains title to S-3 blending equipment until GSS receives purchase price in
full;

    6.  Scotties
will share all pertinent information about the S-3 blending equipment, puree and
customer experience during the test period;

    7. Upon
termination of the 90 day test, Scotties will enter into the purchase agreement
attached hereto as exhibit "A;" and

    8. Should
Scotties fail to enter into the attached Purchase Agreement at the end of the 90
Test, GSS shall remove the S-3 blending equipment within 15 days of the
conclusion of the test.

    


    TEST
START DATE ____________ TEST END DATE __________

    


    Sincerely,

    


    /s/ David C.
Tiller

    David C.
Tiller

    Chairman/CEO

    


    


    Read,
Approved & Agreed:

    


    


    Scotties
Rockwell

    


    /s/

    


    Title,
Gen. Partner