alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1**

**Certification of Chief Executive Officer Under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

The undersigned officer of The First Bancorp, Inc.  (the "Company") hereby certifies that the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008 to which this certification is being furnished as an exhibit (the "Report"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. This certification is provided pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K ("Item 601(b)(32)") promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"), and the Exchange Act. In accordance with clause (ii) of Item 601(b)(32),this certification (A) shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and (B) shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.

 

Date: May 9, 2008

 

/s/ Daniel R. Daigneault

Daniel R. Daigneault

President & Chief Executive Officer

The First Bancorp, Inc.
PGI 236.602-1 Selection criteria.       (a) The evaluation criteria should be project specific. Use the information in the DD Form 1391, FY__ Military Construction Project Data, when available, and other pertinent project data in preparing the evaluation criteria.          (4) Use performance evaluation data from the Contractor Performance Assessment Report System (CPARS).          (6) The primary factor in architect-engineer contractor selection is the determination of the most highly qualified firm. Also consider secondary factors such as geographic proximity and equitable distribution of work, but do not attribute greater significance to the secondary factors than to qualifications and past performance. Do not reject the overall most highly qualified firm solely in the interest of equitable distribution of contracts.          (A) Consider the volume of work awarded by DoD during the previous 12 months. In considering equitable distribution of work among architect-engineer firms, include small business concerns; historically black colleges and universities and minority institutions; firms that have not had prior DoD contracts; and small disadvantaged business concerns and joint ventures with small disadvantaged business participants if the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) Industry Subsector of the acquisition is one in which use of a price evaluation adjustment is currently authorized (see FAR 19.201(b)).          (*1*) Use data extracted from the Federal Procurement Data System (FPDS).          (*2*) Do not consider awards to overseas offices for projects outside the United States, its territories and possessions. Do not consider awards to a subsidiary if the subsidiary is not normally subject to management decisions, bookkeeping, and policies of a holding or parent company or an incorporated subsidiary that operates under a firm name different from the parent company. This allows greater competition.          (B) Consider as appropriate superior performance evaluations on recently completed DoD contracts.          (C) Consider the extent to which potential contractors identify and commit to small business, to small disadvantaged business (SDB) if the NAICS Industry Subsector of the subcontracted effort is one in which use of an evaluation factor or subfactor for participation of SDB concerns is currently authorized (see FAR 19.201(b)), and to historically black college or university and minority institution performance as subcontractors.    **Parent topic:** PGI 236.602 Selection of firms for architect-engineer contracts.
```

[House Report 106-998]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

106th Congress                                                   Report
                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
 2d Session                                                     106-998

======================================================================

 
 PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF HOUSE JOINT RESOLUTIONS 115, 116, 117, 
 118, 119, AND 120, EACH MAKING FURTHER CONTINUING APPROPRIATIONS FOR 
                            FISCAL YEAR 2001

                                _______
                                

  October 24, 2000.--Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

                                _______
                                

    Mr. Linder, from the Committee on Rules, submitted the following

                              R E P O R T

                       [To accompany H. Res. 646]

    The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration 
House Resolution 646, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to 
the House with the recommendation that the resolution be 
adopted.

                  SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF RESOLUTION

    The resolution provides for consideration in the House of 
House Joint Resolutions 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, and 120, each 
making further continuing appropriations for fiscal year 2001, 
under separate closed rules. The rule waives all points of 
order against consideration of each joint resolution. The rule 
also provides one hour of debate on each joint resolution 
equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking 
minority member of the Committee on Appropriations. Finally, 
the rule provides one motion to recommit each joint resolution.

                                

```
§ 52.133 Relationship to other subparts. ( a ) This subpart applies to a person that requests a standard design approval from the NRC staff separately from an application for a construction permit filed under 10 CFR part 50 or a combined license filed under subpart C of this part. An applicant for a construction permit or combined license may reference a standard design approval.
( b ) Subpart B of this part governs the certification by rulemaking of the design of a nuclear power plant. Subpart B may be used independently of the provisions in this subpart.
( c ) Subpart F of this part governs the issuance of licenses to manufacture nuclear power reactors to be installed and operated at sites not identified in the manufacturing license application. Subpart F of this part may be used independently of the provisions in this subpart.
§ 966.60 Inspection and certification. ( a ) During any period in which the handling of tomatoes is regulated pursuant to this subpart no handler shall handle tomatoes unless such tomatoes have been inspected and certified as meeting the requirements of this subpart by an authorized representative of the Federal or Federal-State Inspection Service, or such other inspection service as the Secretary shall designate, and such tomatoes are covered by a valid inspection certificate except when relieved from such requirements pursuant to § 966.53 or § 966.54 or both.
( b ) Insofar as the requirements of this section are concerned, the length of time for which an inspection certificate is valid may be established by the Secretary upon the recommendation of the committee.
( c ) When tomatoes are inspected in accordance with the requirements of this section a copy of each inspection certificate issued shall be made available to the committee by the inspection service.
[34 FR 19186, Dec. 4, 1969]
FT1 F COPY OFFICIALNOTICE FROM COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS P.O. BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711

10/8/2015 COA No. 12-15-00012-CR 

### MALLARD, ANTHONYJERMAINE Tr. Ct. No. 43518-A PD-1327-15 

### The Appellant's Petition for Discretionary Review has this day been filed. [The Court requires ten copies of this documentto be filed in this office withinthree (3) days pursuantto Rule 9.3(b). Failure to send copies will result inthe refusal ofthe petition.] Abel Acosta, Clerk

12TH COURT OF APPEALS CLERK CATHY LUSK 1517 W. FRONT, ROOM 354 TYLER, TX 75701

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *
2446.710 Contract clauses.

(c)

(1) The contracting officer may include a clause substantially the same as FAR 52.246-19, Warranty

of Systems and Equipment under Performance Specifications or Design Criteria, whenever it is in

the Government's interest.

Parent topic: Subpart 2446.7 - Warranties
### Effects of shrubland changes on birds in the Intermountain West

By: Steven T. Knick**Thomas R. Loveland**

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/fs12302

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (420 KB pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
#### § 50.31 Combining applications.

An applicant may combine in one his several applications for different kinds of licenses under the regulations in this chapter.
H. Res. 487

In the House of Representatives, U.S., 

December 13, 2005.

Whereas the influence of Korean Americans may be observed 

in all facets of American life, including entrepreneurship, 

the arts, and education; 

Whereas on January 13, 1903, 102 pioneer Korean immigrants arrived in the United States initiating the first 

chapter of Korean immigration to America; 

Whereas the centennial year of 2003 marked an important 

milestone in the history of Korean immigration; 

Whereas Korean Americans, like other groups of immigrants 

that came to the United States before them, have settled 

and thrived in the United States through strong family 

ties, community support, and hard work; 

Whereas Korean Americans have made significant contributions to the economic vitality of the United States and 

the global marketplace; 

Whereas Korean Americans have invigorated businesses, 

churches, and academic communities in the United 

States; 

Whereas Korean Americans have made enormous contributions to the military strength of the United States; 
2

•HRES 487 EH 

Whereas today, at least 4,000 Korean Americans serve in the 

Armed Forces of the United States, with approximately 

25 percent of them currently serving in Iraq; and 

Whereas the Centennial Committees of Korean Immigration 

and Korean Americans have designated January 13 of 

each year as ‘‘Korean American Day’’ to commemorate 

the first step of the long and prosperous journey of Korean Americans in the United States: Now, therefore, be 

it

Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

(1) supports the goals and ideals of a Korean 

American Day; 

(2) urges all Americans to observe Korean American Day so as to have a greater appreciation of the invaluable contributions Korean Americans have made to 

United States; and 

(3) honors and recognizes the 103rd anniversary of 

the arrival of the first Korean immigrants to the United 

States.

Attest:

Clerk.
PGI 242.7303 Responsibilities.       (1)  The ACO is responsible for—          (i) Determining the need for a CIPR in accordance with the procedures at DFARS 242.7302;          (ii)  Requesting and scheduling the reviews with the appropriate DCMA activity;          (iii)  Notifying the contractor of the proposed date and purpose of the review, and obtaining any preliminary data needed by the DCMA insurance/pension specialist or the DCAA auditor;          (iv)  Reviewing the CIPR report, advising the contractor of the recommendations contained within the report, considering contractor comments, and rendering a decision based on those recommendations;          (v)  Providing other interested contracting officers copies of documents related to the CIPR;          (vi)  Ensuring adequate follow-up on all CIPR recommendations; and          (vii)  Performing contract administration responsibilities related to Cost Accounting Standards administration as described in FAR Subparts 30.2 and 30.6.          (2)  The DCMA insurance/pension specialist is responsible for—          (i)  Issuing a technical report on the contractor’s insurance/pension plans for incorporation into the final CIPR report based on an analysis of the contractor’s pension plans, insurance programs, and other related data;          (ii)  Leading the team that conducts the review.  Another individual may serve as the team leader when both the insurance/pension specialist and that individual agree.  The team leader is responsible for—          (A)  Maintaining complete documentation for CIPR reports;          (B)  To the extent possible, resolving discrepancies between audit reports and CIPR draft reports prior to releasing the final CIPR report;          (C)  Preparing and distributing the final CIPR report;          (D)  Providing the final audit report and/or the insurance/pension specialist’s report as an attachment to the CIPR report; and          (E)  Preparing a draft letter for the administrative contracting officer's use in notifying the contractor of CIPR results; and          (iii)  When requested, advising administrative contracting officers and other Government representatives concerning contractor insurance/pension matters.          (3)  The DCAA auditor is responsible for—          (i)  Participating as a member of the CIPR team or serving as the team leader (see paragraph (2)(ii) of this section);          (ii)  Issuing an audit report for incorporation into the final CIPR report based on an analysis of the contractor’s books, accounting records, and other related data; and          (iii)  Performing contract audit responsibilities related to Cost Accounting Standards administration as described in FAR Subparts 30.2 and 30.6.    **Parent topic:** PGI 242.73 -CONTRACTOR INSURANCE/PENSION REVIEW
PGI 222.101-4 Removal of items from

contractors' facilities affected by work

stoppages.

(a)(ii) Include the following information in the request:

(1) Contract number.

(2) A statement as to the urgency and criticality of the item needed.

(3) A description of the items to be moved (nature of the item, amount, approximate weight and

cubic feet, item number, etc.).

(4) Mode of transportation by which the items are to be moved, if different than in the contract, and

whether by Government or commercial bill of lading.

(5) Destination of the material, if different from that specified in the contract.

Parent topic: PGI 222.101 Labor relations.
Editorial Note on Part 31
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 31 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

§ 31.23 Criminal penalties. ( a ) Section 223 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, provides for criminal sanctions for willful violation of, attempted violation of, or conspiracy to violate, any regulation issued under sections 161b, 161i, or 161o of the Act. For purposes of section 223, all the regulations in part 31 are issued under one or more of sections 161b, 161i, or 161o, except for the sections listed in paragraph (b) of this section.
( b ) The regulations in part 31 that are not issued under sections 161b, 161i, or 161o for the purposes of section 223 are as follows: §§ 31.1, 31.2, 31.4, 31.9, 31.22, and 31.23.
[57 FR 55073, Nov. 24, 1992. Redesignated at 72 FR 55927, Oct. 1, 2007, and amended at 77 FR 43690, July 25, 2012]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                5
<MULTIPLIER>             1,000
       
<S>                                 <C>     
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                 DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                      MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                  2,000
<SECURITIES>                                0
<RECEIVABLES>                         122,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                0
<INVENTORY>                                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                      151,000
<PP&E>                              5,373,000
<DEPRECIATION>                      1,663,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                      3,861,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>               3,877,000
<BONDS>                                     0
<COMMON>                              578,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       0
<PREFERRED>                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                         (1,508,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>        3,861,000
<SALES>                                     0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                       11,000
<CGS>                                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                         258,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                     49,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                      (296,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                  (296,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                              0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                             0
<CHANGES>                                   0
<NET-INCOME>                         (296,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                           (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                           (0.01)
        



</TABLE>
#### Alec J. MEGIBOW, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CLERK OF THE UNITED STATES TAX COURT, Defendant-Appellee.

Docket No. 04-6204 CV.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Argued: Dec. 12, 2005.

Decided: Dec. 21, 2005.

Anthony M. Bentley, New York, N.Y., for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Peter M. Skinner, Assistant United States Attorney for David N. Kelley, United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York (Ramon E. Reyes, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, on the brief), New York, N.Y., for Defendant Appellee.

Before: CALABRESI, KATZMANN, and HALL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

This appeal presents the issue of whether the United States Tax Court (“Tax Court”), established by the Tax Reform Act of 1969, 26 U.S.C. § 7441,1 is subject to the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”), 5 U.S.C. § 552 — or whether it qualifies as a court of the United States, and is therefore expressly outside the ambit of FOIA. *See*5 U.S.C. § 551(1)(B) (excluding from FOIA “the courts of the United States”). The question is one of first instance, and heretofore has not been addressed by us.2 The district court below *388(Lynch, /.), in a thorough and well-reasoned opinion, concluded that the Tax Court is, in fact, a court for the purposes of FOIA. Accordingly, it held that FOIA could not be applied to the Tax Court. We affirm for the reasons given by the district court.

We have considered all of Appellant’s arguments and find them to be without merit. The judgment of the district court is hereby Affirmed.

1

. "There is hereby established, under article I of the Constitution of the United States, a court of record to be known as the United States Tax Court. The members of the Tax Court shall be the chief judge and the judges of the Tax Court.” 26 U.S.C. § 7441.

2

. Among the federal courts, only the District Court of Montana has previously considered the issue. It concluded, as we do, that the Tax Court is not subject to FOIA, and the Ninth Circuit affirmed the decision in an unpublished summary order. *See Ostheimer v. Chumbley,*498 F.Supp. 890, 892 (D.Mont. 1980), *aff'd,*746 F.2d 1487 (9th Cir.1984).
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                       18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 (AS ADOPTED

                         PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

           In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sionix Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, James
R. Currier, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify to my knowledge and
in my capacity as an officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

           1.     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
                  as amended; and,

           2.     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods
                  expressed in the Report.


Date: January 5, 2010



                                    /s/ James R. Currier
                                    ------------------------------------------
                                    James R. Currier
                                    Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, Secretary
                                    and Principal Executive Officer


A certification furnished pursuant to this Item will not be deemed "filed" for
purposes of section 18 of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78r), or otherwise subject
to the liability of that section. Such certification will not be deemed to be
incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the
Exchange Act, except to the extent that the registrant specifically incorporates
it by reference.
#### § 205.304 Other information.

Where the application is for authority to export less than 1,000,000 kilowatt hours annually, applicants need not furnish the information called for in §§ 205.302(g) and 205.303 (Exhibit C). Applicants, regardless of the amount of electric energy to be exported, may be required to furnish such supplemental information as the ERA may deem pertinent.