Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 236 / Thursday, December 9, 2010 / Notices 76771 

3 15 U.S.C. 78f(b). 

4 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4). 

5See CBOE Fees Schedule, Section 1. 

6NASDAQ OMX PHLX, Inc. categorizes its equity 

options transaction fees for Specialists, ROTs, 

SQTs, RSQTs and Broker-Dealers as either 

electronic or non-electronic. See NASDAQ OMX 

PHLX Fees Schedule, Equity Options Fees. NYSE 

Amex, Inc. categorizes its options transaction fees 

for Non-NYSE Amex Options Market Makers, 

Broker-Dealers, Professional Customers, Non BD 

Customers and Firms as either electronic or manual. 

See NYSE Amex Options Fees Schedule, Trade 

Related Charges. NYSE Arca, Inc. categorizes its 

options transaction fees for Customers, Firms and 

Broker-Dealers as either electronic or manual. See 

NYSE Arca Options Fees Schedule, Trade Related 

Charges. 

7 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A). 

8 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(2). 9 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). 

6(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 

1934 (‘‘Act’’),3 in general, and furthers 

the objectives of Section 6(b)(4) 4 of the 

Act in particular, in that it is designed 

to provide for the equitable allocation of 

reasonable dues, fees, and other charges 

among its members and other persons 

using its facilities. The Exchange 

believes the proposed extension of the 

fee waiver is reasonable because it 

would continue to provide cost savings 

during the extended waiver period for 

public customers trading SPDR options 

and is consistent with other fees 

assessed by the Exchange. The Exchange 

assesses manually executed brokerdealer orders a different rate ($.25 per 

contract) as compared to electronically 

executed broker-dealer orders ($.45 per 

contract), and a different rate ($.20 per 

contract) for broker-dealer orders 

executed on AIM as compared to other 

electronic executions and manual 

executions of broker-dealer orders.5

Other exchange fee schedules also 

distinguish between electronically and 

non-electronically executed orders.6

The Exchange believes the proposed fee 

waiver is equitable because it would 

apply uniformly to all public customers 

trading SPDR options. 

B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s 

Statement on Burden on Competition 

CBOE does not believe that the 

proposed rule change will impose any 

burden on competition that is not 

necessary or appropriate in furtherance 

of purposes of the Act. 

C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s 

Statement on Comments on the 

Proposed Rule Change Received From 

Members, Participants or Others 

No written comments were solicited 

or received with respect to the proposed 

rule change. 

III. Date of Effectiveness of the 

Proposed Rule Change and Timing for 

Commission Action 

The foregoing rule change has become 

effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) 

of the Act 7 and subparagraph (f)(2) of 

Rule 19b–4 8 thereunder. At any time 

within 60 days of the filing of the 

proposed rule change, the Commission 

summarily may temporarily suspend 

such rule change if it appears to the 

Commission that such action is 

necessary or appropriate in the public 

interest, for the protection of investors, 

or otherwise in furtherance of the 

purposes of the Act. 

IV. Solicitation of Comments 

Interested persons are invited to 

submit written data, views, and 

arguments concerning the foregoing, 

including whether the proposed rule 

change is consistent with the Act. 

Comments may be submitted by any of 

the following methods: 

Electronic Comments 

• Use the Commission’s Internet 

comment form (http://www.sec.gov/ 

rules/sro.shtml); or 

• Send an e-mail to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File 

Number SR–CBOE–2010–105 on the 

subject line. 

Paper Comments 

• Send paper comments in triplicate 

to Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary, 

Securities and Exchange Commission, 

100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC 

20549. 

All submissions should refer to File 

Number SR–CBOE–2010–105. This file 

number should be included on the 

subject line if e-mail is used. To help the 

Commission process and review your 

comments more efficiently, please use 

only one method. The Commission will 

post all comments on the Commission’s 

Internet website (http://www.sec.gov/ 

rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the 

submission, all subsequent 

amendments, all written statements 

with respect to the proposed rule 

change that are filed with the 

Commission, and all written 

communications relating to the 

proposed rule change between the 

Commission and any person, other than 

those that may be withheld from the 

public in accordance with the 

provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be 

available for website viewing and 

printing in the Commission’s Public 

Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE., 

Washington, DC 20549 on official 

business days between the hours of 10 

a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such filing 

also will be available for inspection and 

copying at the principal office of CBOE. 

All comments received will be posted 

without change; the Commission does 

not edit personal identifying 

information from submissions. You 

should submit only information that 

you wish to make available publicly. All 

submissions should refer to File 

Number SR–CBOE–2010–105 and 

should be submitted on or before 

December 30, 2010. 

For the Commission, by the Division of 

Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated 

authority.9

Florence E. Harmon, 

Deputy Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2010–30941 Filed 12–8–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8011–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

[Public Notice 7263] 

In the Matter of the Designation of 

Fahd Mohammed Ahmed al-Quso, also 

known as Fahd al-Quso, also known as 

Abu Huthaifah, also known as Abu 

Huthaifah al-Yemeni, also known as 

Abu Huthaifah al-Adani, also known as 

Abu al-Bara’, also known as Abu 

Hathayfah al-Adani, also known as 

Fahd Mohammed Ahmed al-Awlaqi, 

also known as Huthaifah al-Yemeni, 

also known as Abu Huthaifah al-Abu 

al-Bara’, also known as Fahd 

Muhammad Ahmad al-Kusso, as a 

Specially Designated Global Terrorist 

pursuant to Section 1(b) of Executive 

Order 13224, as Amended 

Acting under the authority of and in 

accordance with section 1(b) of 

Executive Order 13224 of September 23, 

2001, as amended by Executive Order 

13268 of July 2, 2002, and Executive 

Order 13284 of January 23, 2003, I 

hereby determine that the individual 

known as Fahd Mohammed Ahmed alQuso, also known as Fahd al-Quso, also 

known as Abu Huthaifah, also known as 

Abu Huthaifah al-Yemeni, also known 

as Abu Huthaifah al-Adani, also known 

as Abu al-Bara’, also known as Abu 

Hathayfah al-Adani, also known as Fahd 

Mohammed Ahmed al-Awlaqi, also 

known as Huthaifah al-Yemeni, also 

known as Abu Huthaifah al-Abu alBara’, also known as Fahd Muhammad 

Ahmad al-Kusso, committed, or poses a 

significant risk of committing, acts of 

terrorism that threaten the security of 

U.S. nationals or the national security, 

foreign policy, or economy of the United 

States. 

Consistent with the determination in 

section 10 of Executive Order 13224 that 

‘‘prior notice to persons determined to 

be subject to the Order who might have 


erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES
76772 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 236 / Thursday, December 9, 2010 / Notices 

a constitutional presence in the United 

States would render ineffectual the 

blocking and other measures authorized 

in the Order because of the ability to 

transfer funds instantaneously,’’ I 

determine that no prior notice needs to 

be provided to any person subject to this 

determination who might have a 

constitutional presence in the United 

States, because to do so would render 

ineffectual the measures authorized in 

the Order. 

This notice shall be published in the 

Federal Register. 

Dated: October 18, 2010. 

Hillary Rodham Clinton, 

Secretary of State. 

[FR Doc. 2010–31001 Filed 12–8–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4710–10–P 

DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

[Public Notice 7260] 

Bureau of Educational and Cultural 

Affairs Request for Grant Proposals: 

Future Leaders Exchange Civic 

Education Workshop 

Announcement Type: New Grant. 

Funding Opportunity Number: ECA/ 

PE/C/PY–11–16. 

Catalog of Federal and Domestic 

Assistance Number: 19.415. 

Key Dates: 

Application Deadline: January 4, 

2011. 

Executive Summary: The Office of 

Citizen Exchanges, Youth Programs 

Division, of the Bureau of Educational 

and Cultural Affairs announces an open 

competition to conduct the Spring Civic 

Education Workshop for students 

participating in the academic year 

Future Leaders Exchange (FLEX) 

program. The goal of the Spring 

Workshop is to broaden the 

participants’ knowledge and 

understanding of the democratic 

concepts that are integral to a civil 

society and to provide them with tools 

they can take home to aid in the 

transformation of their countries. Public 

and private non-profit organizations 

meeting the provisions described in IRS 

regulation 26 CFR 1.501(c) may submit 

proposals to develop and conduct a oneweek workshop in Washington, DC, in 

Spring 2011. The workshop should 

include approximately 100 high school 

students from 10 Eurasian countries 

who are attending school in the United 

States during the 2010/11 academic 

year. Spring Workshop participants will 

be selected through an essay contest 

from among a group of approximately 

976 students who are participating in 

the academic year component of the 

Division’s Future Leaders Exchange 

program. Provision of cost sharing to 

maximize the number of participants 

will be looked at very favorably. 

I. Funding Opportunity Description 

Authority: Overall grant making 

authority for this program is contained 

in the Mutual Educational and Cultural 

Exchange Act of 1961, Public Law 87– 

256, as amended, also known as the 

Fulbright-Hays Act. The purpose of the 

Act is ‘‘to enable the Government of the 

United States to increase mutual 

understanding between the people of 

the United States and the people of 

other countries * * *; to strengthen the 

ties which unite us with other nations 

by demonstrating the educational and 

cultural interests, developments, and 

achievements of the people of the 

United States and other nations * * * 

and thus to assist in the development of 

friendly, sympathetic and peaceful 

relations between the United States and 

the other countries of the world.’’ The 

funding authority for the program above 

is provided through legislation. 

Purpose: The Civic Education 

Workshop should provide an 

opportunity for participants to gain a 

better understanding of the democratic 

concepts and values that are such an 

integral part of American society and 

culture. Concepts such as citizen 

empowerment, volunteerism, 

community action, and debate should 

be included in program components. 

The program should also enable 

participants to learn firsthand about the 

Federal system of government, observe 

government institutions, hear about and 

discuss issues on the Federal agenda, 

and interact with government officials. 

Dedicated time blocks should be 

provided for exposure to and education 

about the American election process. 

Special attention also should be paid to 

those issues that will be especially 

significant to people from the countries 

of the former Soviet Union. 

Responsibilities: The recipient of the 

grant is responsible for developing and 

conducting the Civic Education 

Workshop based on guidelines set forth 

by the Division. The grantee 

organization will also be responsible for 

coordinating roundtrip travel 

arrangements for each participant in the 

Spring Workshop from his/her host 

community to Washington, DC, and for 

providing room and board for students 

during their time in Washington. The 

grantee must be amenable to working 

with the Department of State and the 

Bureau in arranging certain briefings 

and visits, as the opportunity arises. 

The Spring Workshop should be 

arranged for seven days, including 

arrival and departure. The grantee 

organization will be provided with the 

names of the students who will have 

been chosen for the Spring Workshop 

after competing in an essay contest. The 

essays will have been reviewed by 

independent, objective, speciallytrained selectors. 

Guidelines: The Spring Workshop 

should be held in early spring 2011 

during a time when Congress is in 

session. Proposals must effectively 

describe the organization’s ability to 

accomplish the following essential 

components of the program: 

1. Provide a Civic Education 

Workshop in Washington, DC, as 

described above and held at the time 

period indicated. Program components 

should include sessions on U.S. 

domestic and foreign policy, the role of 

the media in a civil society, citizen 

empowerment, volunteerism and 

community activism, and federalism. 

2. Provide pre-program training for 

organization staff on the society and 

culture of relevant countries before the 

workshop. 

3. Provide housing and meals for all 

students throughout the Workshop. 

4. Arrange roundtrip travel for Spring 

Workshop students from their U.S. host 

communities to Washington, DC, in 

coordination with FLEX placement 

organizations. (Note: Students will 

likely be traveling from most of the 50 

states.) Provide ground transportation 

for students in the DC area, including to 

and from Washington area airports. 

5. Provide opportunities to attend 

cultural events and visit museums and 

monuments. 

6. Coordinate with the Bureau’s Youth 

Programs Division and the Office of 

Legislative Affairs in making 

appropriate arrangements for individual 

meetings for all Spring Workshop 

participants with their respective 

Members of Congress (Senators and/or 

Representative). 

7. Provide staff to assist in case of 

medical emergencies. 

8. Incorporate a component into the 

Spring Workshop designed to facilitate 

students’ transition from the DC 

program back to their host communities. 

Include a description of the ways in 

which all students will be encouraged to 

share what they have learned, both in 

their U.S. host communities and when 

they return to their home countries. 

9. Provide a mechanism for evaluation 

of the program in terms of its impact on 

the students and its success in fulfilling 

the objectives. 

A competitive proposal will 

incorporate important elements of 

American culture in sessions that are 

largely interactive and designed to 


erowe on DSK5CLS3C1PROD with NOTICES