alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Robert Dorfman, Appellant, v. Texaco, Inc., et al., Respondents.

Appeal by plaintiff from two judgments of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, entered February 7, 1966 and February 15, 1966, respectively, both in favor of defendants upon a jury verdict. Appeal from judgment of February 7, 1966 dismissed as academic. That judgment was amended and superseded by the judgment entered February 15, 1966. Judgment of February 15, 1966 affirmed. One bill of costs is allowed to respondents to cover both appeals. In our opinion, the evidence presented questions of fact as to the individual defendant’s negligence and plaintiff’s contributory negligence which were properly submitted to the jury. The verdict of the jury is adequately supported by the evidence and the reasonable inferences to be drawn therefrom. While the attempted impeachment of plaintiff’s witness McWeeney was unfair and improper, under the circumstances herein it did not constitute error requiring reversal. Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan and Martuseello, JJ., concur; Rabin and Benjamin, JJ., concur in the dismissal of the appeal from the judgment of February 7, 1966, but otherwise dissent and vote to reverse the judgment of February 15, 1966 and to grant a new trial, with the following memorandum: Plaintiff is the owner and operator of a Texaco service station. Defendant Texaco, Inc., furnishes gasoline to plaintiff’s station. Defendant Dumey is the driver of one of Texaco’s gasoline trucks. These trucks have swinging doors on the side which are opened by “ T ” handles; when not in use, these handles rest against the side of the truck, in recessed wells in the doors; when in use, they stick out from the door at a right angle, protruding, according to plaintiff’s proof, from 3 to 6 inches. On the day of the accident, a Texaco truck, driven by Dumey, delivered gasoline to plaintiff’s station. When the delivery was completed, Dumey started to drive the truck out of the station. While doing so, he passed by a gasoline pump where plaintiff was putting gasoline into a customer’s car, with his back to Durney’s truck. It is undisputed that the *“*T ” handle on the truck was not flush against the track, in the recessed well provided for it, but instead was sticking out at a right-angle; and it is also undisputed that as the track passed by plaintiff the “T” handle caught the seat of his pants and threw him against the rear wheel of the truck. Cn this record, it is our opinion that the verdict for defendants was against the weight of evidence. It should be reversed and a new trial granted.
<PAGE>


                                                                      EXHIBIT 32


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Universal Detection Technology (the
"Registrant") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2009, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Jacques Tizabi, Principal Executive Officer and Acting Principal Financial
Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of the Registrant, certify to the best
of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Registrant.



                                    /s/ Jacques Tizabi
                                    ------------------
Dated: May 20, 2009                 Jacques Tizabi
                                    Principal Executive Officer and Acting
                                    Principal Financial Officer and Principal
                                    Accounting Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.3

              CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.ss.1350 AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of AccuPoll
Holding Corp. (the "Company") for the quarter ended December 31, 2002, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company each hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: February 14, 2003

                                          /S/ DENNIS VADURA
                                         Dennis Vadura
                                         Chief Executive Officer

                                          /S/ CRAIG A. HEWITT
                                         -------------------------------------
                                         Craig A. Hewitt
                                         Chief Financial Officer
#### § 590.309 Settlements.

The parties may conduct settlement negotiations. If settlement negotiations are conducted during a conference, at the request of one of the parties, the Assistant Secretary or presiding official may order that the discussions be off-the-record with no transcript of such settlement negotiations being prepared for inclusion in the official record of the proceeding. No offer of settlement, comment or discussion by the parties with respect to an offer of settlement shall be subject to discovery or admissible into evidence against any parties who object to its admission.
USGS HomeContact USGSSearch USGS

Geophysical Unit of Menlo Park, Calif. (GUMP)

##### U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Map 2951

# Isostatic Gravity Map with Geology of the Santa Ana 30’ x 60’ Quadrangle, Southern California

### *By* V.E. Langenheim, Tien-Chang Lee, Shawn Biehler, R.C. Jachens, and D.M. Morton

### 2006

|  |
|--|
#### SHUART et al., Respondents, v. ERIE R. CO., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

December 11, 1914.)

Action by John R. Shuart and others against the Erie Railroad Company.

No opinion. Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs.
Case 2:06-cv-00766-MHT-TFM Document 5 Filed 09/18/2006 Page 1 of 6
Case 2:06-cv-00766-MHT-TFM Document 5 Filed 09/18/2006 Page 2 of 6
Case 2:06-cv-00766-MHT-TFM Document 5 Filed 09/18/2006 Page 3 of 6
Case 2:06-cv-00766-MHT-TFM Document 5 Filed 09/18/2006 Page 4 of 6
Case 2:06-cv-00766-MHT-TFM Document 5 Filed 09/18/2006 Page 5 of 6
Case 2:06-cv-00766-MHT-TFM Document 5 Filed 09/18/2006 Page 6 of 6
IV 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 486 

Commending the Coast Guard for its extraordinary efforts in response to 

Hurricane Katrina and Hurricane Rita. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 7, 2005 

Mrs. JO ANN DAVIS of Virginia submitted the following resolution; which was 

referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

RESOLUTION 

Commending the Coast Guard for its extraordinary efforts 

in response to Hurricane Katrina and Hurricane Rita. 

Whereas more than 33,000 individuals were saved or evacuated by the Coast Guard in response efforts following 

Hurricane Katrina and Hurricane Rita, including— 

(1) more than 24,000 lives saved, including more 

than 12,000 by air resources and more than 11,000 by 

surface resources; and 

(2) more than 9,400 individuals evacuated from hospitals; 

Whereas Coast Guard personnel performed heroically in response to such hurricanes; 

Whereas 4,000 Coast Guard personnel on the ground and 45 

Coast Guard aircraft and 14 Coast Guard Auxiliary air-
2 

•HRES 486 IH 

craft logged over 7,000 flight hours to rescue flood victims in response to such hurricanes; and 

Whereas Coast Guard support in response to such hurricanes 

has been invaluable: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives recog2 nizes and commends the Coast Guard for its extraordinary 

3 efforts in response to Hurricane Katrina and Hurricane 

4 Rita. 

Æ
```

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 32 (Thursday, February 18, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 7297]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-3138]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meeting

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the 
Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the Securities 
and Exchange Commission will hold a Closed Meeting on Thursday, 
February 18, 2010 at 2 p.m.
    Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the 
Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the Closed Meeting. 
Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters also may be 
present.
    The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has 
certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth 
in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (7), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR 
200.402(a)(3), (5), (7), 9(ii) and (10), permit consideration of the 
scheduled matters at the Closed Meeting.
    Commissioner Walter, as duty officer, voted to consider the items 
listed for the Closed Meeting in a closed session, and determined that 
no earlier notice thereof was possible.
    The subject matter of the Closed Meeting scheduled for Thursday, 
February 18, 2010 will be:

Institution and settlement of injunctive actions;
Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings;
An adjudicatory matter;
Amicus consideration; and
Other matters relating to enforcement proceedings.
    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in 
the scheduling of meeting items.
    For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have 
been added, deleted or postponed, please contact:
    The Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

    Dated: February 12, 2010.
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-3138 Filed 2-16-10; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
```
Exhibit 32





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The undersigned hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the quarterly report of United States Basketball League, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended May 31, 2011 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such quarterly report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operation of United States Basketball League, Inc.




Date:  July 12, 2011/s/ Daniel T. Meisenheimer, IIIDaniel T. Meisenheimer, IIIPresidentDate:  July 12, 2011/s/ Richard C. MeisenheimerRichard C. MeisenheimerChief Financial Officer
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, SOUTHERN DIVISION

TERRY DEESE, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

v. ) 1:06cv643-MHT

) 

CHAMPION ENTERPRISES, )

INC., et al., )

)

Defendants. )

ORDER

It is ORDERED that the uniform scheduling order (Doc.

No. 10) is amended to reflect that the trial of this case

is set for the term of court beginning on February 11,

2008, with all deadlines expressly tied to this date

adjusted accordingly.

DONE, this the 24th day of October, 2007.

 /s/ Myron H. Thompson 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00643-MHT-SRW Document 49 Filed 10/24/2007 Page 1 of 1
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Taxpayer Assistance Center Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Tuesday, March 23, 2010.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ellen Smiley at 1-888-912-1227 or 414-231-2360.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Taxpayer Assistance Center Committee will be held Tuesday, March 23, 2010, at 1 p.m. Central Time                           ( print page 7540)                        via telephone conference. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited conference lines, notification of intent to participate must be made with Ellen Smiley. For more information please contact Ms. Smiley at 1-888-912-1227 or 414-231-2360, or write TAP Office Stop 1006MIL, 211 West Wisconsin Avenue, Milwaukee, WI 53203-2221, or post comments to the Web site:                     *http://www.improveirs.org.*

The agenda will include various IRS issues.

Dated: February 4, 2010.

Shawn F. Collins,

Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.

[FR Doc. 2010-3174 Filed 2-18-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
# L_2023227EN.01001101.xml

| 14.9.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 227/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.9.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 227/11

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE No 151/2020

of 23 October 2020

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement [2023/1726]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (“the EEA Agreement”), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/239 of 20 February 2020 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) No 901/2014 with regard to the adaptation of the templates for type-approval procedures for two- or three-wheel vehicles and quadricycles to the environmental steps Euro 5 and Euro 5+ requirements (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/239 of 20 February 2020 amending Implementing Regulation (EU) No 901/2014 with regard to the adaptation of the templates for type-approval procedures for two- or three-wheel vehicles and quadricycles to the environmental steps Euro 5 and Euro 5+ requirements (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following indent is added in point 46c (Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 901/2014) of Chapter I of Annex II to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘— | 32020 R 0239: Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/239 of 20 February 2020 (OJ L 48, 21.2.2020, p. 6).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

32020 R 0239: Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/239 of 20 February 2020 (OJ L 48, 21.2.2020, p. 6).’

Article 2

The text of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/239 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 24 October 2020, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 23 October 2020.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Sabine MONAUNI

---

(1)  
  OJ L 48, 21.2.2020, p. 6.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 824 

To amend title 23, United States Code, to prohibit expenditure of certain 

transportation and infrastructure funds for a project located in a sanctuary jurisdiction, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 2, 2017 

Mr. SMITH of Missouri introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To amend title 23, United States Code, to prohibit expenditure of certain transportation and infrastructure funds 

for a project located in a sanctuary jurisdiction, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘No Transportation 

5 Funds for Sanctuary Cities Act’’. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 824 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON USE OF GRANT FUNDS IN SANC2 TUARY JURISDICTION. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 1 of title 23, United 

4 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol5 lowing: 

6 ‘‘§ 171. Prohibition on use of grant funds in sanctuary 

7 jurisdiction 

8 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—No grant amounts made avail9 able under this chapter or provided under the heading ‘Of10 fice of the Secretary—National Infrastructure Invest11 ments’ (commonly known as TIGER grants) in the De12 partment of Transportation Appropriations Act, 2016 

13 (title I of division L of Public Law 114–113) or any subse14 quent appropriation Act, may be obligated or expended for 

15 any project located, in whole or in part, in a sanctuary 

16 jurisdiction. 

17 ‘‘(b) SANCTUARY JURISDICTION DEFINED.—In this 

18 section, the term ‘sanctuary jurisdiction’ means any State 

19 or political subdivision of a State that has in effect a stat20 ute, ordinance, policy, or practice that prohibits or re21 stricts any government entity or official from— 

22 ‘‘(1) sending, receiving, maintaining, or ex23 changing with any Federal, State, or local govern24 ment entity information regarding the citizenship or 

25 immigration status (lawful or unlawful) of any indi26 vidual; or 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 824 IH

1 ‘‘(2) complying with any Department of Home2 land Security detainer ordering that the government 

3 entity or official— 

4 ‘‘(A) temporarily hold an alien in custody 

5 so that the alien may be taken into Federal cus6 tody; 

7 ‘‘(B) transport the alien for transfer to 

8 Federal custody; or 

9 ‘‘(C) notify the Department about the re10 lease of the alien.’’. 

11 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The analysis for such 

12 chapter is amended by adding at the end the following: 

‘‘171. Limitation on use of grant funds in sanctuary jurisdiction.’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
PGI 250.103-5 Processing cases.       (1) The officer or official responsible for the case shall forward to the contract adjustment board, through departmental channels, two copies of the following:          (i) A letter stating—          (A) The nature of the case;          (B) The basis for the board's authority to act;          (C) The findings of fact essential to the case (see FAR 50.103-4). Arrange the findings chronologically with cross-references to supporting enclosures;          (D) The conclusions drawn;          (E) The recommended disposition; and          (F) If contractual action is recommended, a statement by the signer that the action will facilitate the national defense.          (ii) The contractor's request.          (iii) All evidentiary materials.          (iv) All endorsements, reports and comments of cognizant Government officials.          (2) A letter to the Board recommending an amendment without consideration where essentiality is a factor (see FAR 50.103-2(a)(1)) should also provide—          (i) The information required by FAR 50.103-4(a) and (b), and          (ii) Findings as to—          (A) The contractor's performance record, including the quality of product, rate of production, and promptness of deliveries;          (B) The importance to the Government, particularly to the active duty military, of the performance of the contract and the importance of the contractor to the national defense;          (C) The forecast of future contracts with the contractor; and          (D) Other available sources of supply for the supplies or services covered by the contract, and the time and cost of having contract performance completed by such other sources.    **Parent topic:** PGI 250.103 Contract adjustments.