alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 797 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 797

 To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to remove the matching 
 requirement for a territory to use specially allocated Federal funds 
     for Medicare covered part D drugs for low-income individuals.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 1, 2017

Miss Gonzalez-Colon of Puerto Rico introduced the following bill; which 
          was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to remove the matching 
 requirement for a territory to use specially allocated Federal funds 
     for Medicare covered part D drugs for low-income individuals.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REMOVING MATCHING REQUIREMENT FOR A TERRITORY TO USE 
              SPECIALLY ALLOCATED FEDERAL FUNDS FOR MEDICARE COVERED 
              PART D DRUGS FOR LOW-INCOME INDIVIDUALS.

    (a) In General.--Section 1935(e)(1)(B) of the Social Security Act 
(42 U.S.C. 1396u-5(e)(1)(B)) is amended by inserting before the period 
at the end the following: ``and the Federal medical assistance 
percentage shall be 100 percent for expenditures under such plan that 
are attributable to this subsection and the additional amounts provided 
under paragraph (3)''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Section 1905(b) of the Social Security 
Act (42 U.S.C. 1396d(b)) is amended by striking ``section 1933(d)'' and 
inserting ``sections 1933(d) and 1935(e)(1)(B)''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to amounts expended for fiscal periods beginning on or after 
October 1, 2017.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


The undersigned  hereby certify  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that the quarterly
report of  United  States  Basketball  League,  Inc.  on Form  10-QSB/A  for the
quarterly  period ended August 31, 2005 fully complies with the  requirements of
Section  13(a)  or  15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934 and that the
information  contained in such quarterly report on Form 10-QSB/A fairly presents
in all material  respects the  financial  condition  and results of operation of
United States Basketball League, Inc.

Date: March 7, 2006

/s/Daniel T. Meisenheimer, III
------------------------------
Daniel T. Meisenheimer, III
President


Date: March 7, 2006

/s/Richard C. Meisenheimer
---------------------------
Richard C. Meisenheimer
Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 3.1**

** **

**CERTIFICATE OF FORMATION**

** **

**OF**

** **

**AMERICAN HONDA RECEIVABLES LLC**

 

This Certificate ofFormation of American Honda Receivables LLC(the “**Company**”),dated as of March 16, 2011, is duly executed and filed to form a limited liability company in accordance with the Delaware LimitedLiability Company Act (6 Del. C. §18-201, et seq.).

 

1.          Name.  The name of the limited liability company is American Honda Receivables LLC.

 

2.          RegisteredOffice.  The address of its registered office in the State of Delaware is c/o The Corporation Trust Company, 1209Orange Street, in the City of Wilmington, County of New Castle, 19801.

 

3.          RegisteredAgent.  The name and address of its registered agent for service of process in the State of Delaware is The Corporation TrustCompany, 1209 Orange Street, in the City of Wilmington, County of New Castle, 19801.

** **

**IN WITNESS WHEREOF**,the undersigned has executed this Certificate of Formation of American Honda Receivables LLC as of the 16th day of March, 2011.

** **
#### § 52.161 [Reserved]
2007-2098.

#### State v. Sellers.

Cuyahoga App. No. 88535, 2007-0hio-4681. On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion granted.

O’Connor, J., dissents.
### Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. 

### FAA- 

# 20/{,.0?ZO Directorate Identifier: 

### -AD 

# C20itf-,.;0t(-/q2-AP

If

you make changes 

### to the values 

### in /he !able below, you must ensure 

### the totals 

### update**according~y.** 

## (l they do not, click (or 

### Tab) i11to and 

### then out<?[the changed cell. Estimated Costs: Action Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, (e.g., Inspection, propeller, appliance) Work-hours Labor Parts Cost Total Costs Number of Total Cost replacement) (include cost {labor+ 

# u.s. for U.S. Fleet Do not include oncondition costs here access, testing, (@$85/h parts) Registered and close-up) our) Products Groups 

### 1-4: 

# vr fi Yll**~wv ~** **s~** {l-12**"- ~**  

## 111 tv Hardware and 23.0 $1,286 t ' )**~** 

### 7 

## 53.., '11 . software changes Group 

### 5: ELMS2 8.0
. , "1\0
. li r> \**(~ ~~** **~1** (j{ 

### 4

. U
. Oi t software update 

### '· I) ( ll <: t H f < i ( I \**~ ~'""!)** **1~ 3**  \ \ } ,} q**~l** 

## 3 91**~** 

### ' ,I 

### ' ;)( i ft • ! 

# "' i?h(1'0 

# . -7-r- 14 q ; nl



### .1 I '11',1 

### ··

### . ; ;' i '

I 

### ' •I ( ; ; " ' <j

. ' ' ' i PI I 

### '**"; ~**  : 

### ' 

# ' ;; I :' 

### •' ' 'L I< ' 1):1 \

'**'~** l H, ,,, ; ! i : '**~** {F}
j I**:** d_Pi I) {**~H** n(: ' {

. • ' " () (H : <> t•q

. \**no ~**  ' ' i :; •**~** ;, 1 ) ; 1;**~** ·. , , PU ; • ';i ! I :**~** (! <h J l' ! i ) 'l ' n:**~** I**~** J ' ', <! :; · ! ' 

## '' The known number of products in compliance: Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $25,407 Costs covered under warranty (if known) $
On-Condition Costs:

# ~ Work-hours Labor cost Parts Cost Cost per Product Action (include access , (@$85/hour) (e
.g., Inspection, testing, and close-

replacement) uo)
;)'J ' ' i i \Cfl**~** ''i !>>l

### Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table that was assumed or might not be obvious. Thisfield can also be used to explain warranty costs): 

### Executive Order 12866: Could the AD be considered a "significant regulatory action"?



# ~ YES*0

**NO~** 

### *Exp lanation : DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures: f 

### I AD . "fi ? • 

### s t 

### 1e s1gnt 1cant. '-
... ../ 

### YES*O

**NO~** 

### *Explanation: Regulatory Flexibility Act: Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for either a Yes or No answer. '

- ' 

### YESO

**NO~** 

### Explanation: Intrastate Aviation in Alaska: This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. fs 

### it appropriate to include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode oftransportation? '

- ' YES*0

**NO~** 

### *Explanation:
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION

J.B., a minor child, by and )

through his next friend, )

Addie Ward, on behalf of )

himself and all others )

similarly situated, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

v. ) 2:06cv755-MHT

) 

WALTER WOOD, in his )

individual capacity, )

)

Defendant. )

J.B., a minor child, by and )

through his next friend, )

Addie Ward, on behalf of )

himself and all others )

similarly situated, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

v. ) 2:06cv908-MHT

) 

WALTER WOOD, in his )

individual capacity, )

)

Defendant. )

Case 2:06-cv-00755-MHT-CSC Document 23-2 Filed 03/08/2007 Page 1 of 2
ORDER

It is ORDERED that the motion for class certification

(doc. no. 21) is set for submission, without oral

argument, on April 3, 2007, with all briefs and

evidentiary materials due by said date.

DONE, this the 8th day of March, 2007.

 /s/ Myron H. Thompson 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00755-MHT-CSC Document 23-2 Filed 03/08/2007 Page 2 of 2
H. Res. 493

In the House of Representatives, U.S., 

October 18, 2005.

Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it 

shall be in order without intervention of any point of order 

to consider in the House the bill (S. 397) to prohibit civil liability actions from being brought or continued against manufacturers, distributors, dealers, or importers of firearms or 

ammunition for damages, injunctive or other relief resulting 

from the misuse of their products by others. The bill shall be 

considered as read. The previous question shall be considered 

as ordered on the bill to final passage without intervening 

motion except: (1) one hour of debate equally divided and 

controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of 

the Committee on the Judiciary; and (2) one motion to recommit.

Attest:

Clerk.
#### LOWE v. LEARY et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

July 10, 1914.)

Action by Marie C. Lowe against Daniel J. Leary, inapleaded with others.

No opinion. Motion denied, with $10 costs. Order filed. See, also, 148 N. Y. Supp. 1127.
IV 

House Calendar No. 122 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 560 

[Report No. 109–303] 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4241) to provide for reconciliation 

pursuant to section 201(a) of the concurrent resolution on the budget 

for fiscal year 2006. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 17 (legislative day, NOVEMBER 16), 2005 

Mr. PUTNAM, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; 

which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4241) to provide 

for reconciliation pursuant to section 201(a) of the concurrent resolution on the budget for fiscal year 2006. 

1 Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution 

2 it shall be in order without intervention of any point of 

3 order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 4241) to 

4 provide for reconciliation pursuant to section 201(a) of the 

5 concurrent resolution on the budget for fiscal year 2006. 

6 The bill shall be considered as read. The amendment 

7 printed in the report of the Committee on Rules accom-
2 

HRES 560 RH 

1 panying this resolution shall be considered as adopted. All 

2 points of order against provisions in the bill, as amended, 

3 are waived. The previous question shall be considered as 

4 ordered on the bill, as amended, to final passage without 

5 intervening motion except: (1) two hours of debate equally 

6 divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking mi7 nority member of the Committee on the Budget; and (2) 

8 one motion to recommit with or without instructions. 

9 SEC. 2. During consideration of H.R. 4241 pursuant 

10 to this resolution, notwithstanding the operation of the 

11 previous question, the Chair may postpone further consid12 eration of the bill to a time designated by the Speaker. 

13 SEC. 3. After passage of H.R. 4241, it shall be in 

14 order to take from the Speaker’s table S. 1932 and to 

15 consider the Senate bill in the House. All points of order 

16 against the Senate bill and against its consideration are 

17 waived. It shall be in order to move to strike all after the 

18 enacting clause of the Senate bill and to insert in lieu 

19 thereof the provisions of H.R. 4241 as passed by the 

20 House. All points of order against that motion are waived. 

House Calendar No. 122 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 560 

[Report No. 109–303] 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4241) 

N

for fiscal year 2006. 201(a) of the concurrent resolution on the budget to provide for reconciliation pursuant to section 

OVEMBER 17 (legislative day, NOVEMBER 16), 2005 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed
§ 473.20 Public notice and opportunity to object. ( a ) In compliance with paragraph (b) of this section and unless provisions of paragraph (c) of this section apply, the manager shall cause to be published in the Commerce Business Daily a statement describing the unsolicited proposal, solicitation, DOE project, or agency project, as appropriate, inviting any interested person to submit a written objection, with supporting information at an appropriate address on or before 30 days from the date of publication, if the person believes that the research and development to be performed does not comply with standards and criteria of § 473.30.
( b ) Except as paragraph (c) of this section applies, the manager shall comply with the requirements of paragraph (a) of this section— ( 1 ) Upon receipt of an unsolicited proposal from an applicant;
( 2 ) In any notice of availability of a solicitation;
( 3 ) Prior to beginning a DOE project; or
( 4 ) Prior to beginning an agency project.
( c ) Without publishing a notice under paragraph (a) of this section, the manager may reject an unsolicited proposal that does not comply with these regulations or any other generally applicable requirements.
EXHIBIT 32.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 (AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)





In connection with Quarterly Report of Sionix Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David R. Wells, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to my knowledge and in my capacity as an officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and,


2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.





Date: August 23, 2010


/s/ David R. WellsDavid R. WellsPresident, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary/Treasurer, and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer





A certification furnished pursuant to this Item will not be deemed “filed” for purposes of section 18 of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78r), or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the registrant specifically incorporates it by reference.
State of California AIR RESOURCES BOARD Executive Order G-99-077 WHEREAS, on December 10, 1998, the Air Resources Board (the A Board) conducted a publichearing to consider amendments to the California Regulations for New 1997 and Later OffHighway Recreational Vehicles and Engines; WHEREAS, following the public hearing, the Board adopted Resolution 98-66, in which the Board approved amendment of Title 13, California Code of Regulations, sections 2410, 2411, 2412, 2413, 2414, and the incorporated A California Exhaust Emissions Standards and Test Procedures for 1997 and Later Off-Highway Recreational Vehicles and Engines, @ and adoption of section 2415, with the modifications set forth in Appendices A and B thereto; WHEREAS, the approved regulations were made available for public comment for a period of 15 days, with the changes to the originally proposed text clearly indicated, in accordance with the provisions of Title 1, California Code of Regulations, section 44; and WHEREAS, no written comments were received during this 15-day comment period. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the recitals and findings contained in Resolution 98- 66 are incorporated by reference herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the regulatory adoption and amendments adopted herein, and any additional documentation identified as necessary for approvability under the federal Clean Air Act and United States Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA), be forwarded to the U.S. EPA for a request for waiver or confirmation that the regulations are within the scope of an existing waiver of federal preemption pursuant to section 209 of the Clean Air Act, as appropriate. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, in accordance with Resolution 98-66 that sections 2410, 2411, 2412, 2413, 2414, and the incorporated A California Exhaust Emissions Standards and Test Procedures for 1997 and Later Off-Highway Recreational Vehicles and Engines, @ are amended, and section 2415 is adopted as set forth in Attachment 1 hereto. Executed this day of , 1999, at Sacramento, California.

Michael P. Kenny Executive Officer Attachment
IV 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 27 

Rejecting the ‘‘two-state solution’’ as the United States’ diplomatic policy 

objective and calls for the Administration to advocate for a new approach 

that prioritizes the State of Israel’s sovereignty, security, and borders. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 5, 2017 

Mr. KING of Iowa submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 

the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

RESOLUTION 

Rejecting the ‘‘two-state solution’’ as the United States’ diplomatic policy objective and calls for the Administration 

to advocate for a new approach that prioritizes the State 

of Israel’s sovereignty, security, and borders. 

Whereas the State of Israel is the modern re-establishment 

of the sovereign nation state of the Jewish people in their 

ancestral homeland; 

Whereas the State of Israel is the only consistent and reliable 

beacon of freedom and democracy in the Middle East; 

Whereas the State of Israel was founded in 1948 and its legitimacy is inviolable, and is in no way contingent on the 

resolution of any regional conflict; 

Whereas Judea and Samaria is the heartland of the Biblical 

holy land, the cradle of Jewish civilization, and Israel’s 


smartinez on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 27 IH 

claim to this internationally disputed territory is right 

and just; 

Whereas the State of Israel is a crucial strategic ally of the 

United States in the region and in the larger war against 

the threats from radical Islam; 

Whereas the State of Israel is under constant threat of belligerence from the threat of diplomatic anti-Semitism, and 

violent attack from terrorism, and military threat by radical Islamic forces and governments, like the Islamic Republic of Iran; 

Whereas the potential for a failed Palestinian Arab state in 

Judea and Samaria remains a clear and present danger 

to the people of Israel; and 

Whereas the Palestinian Authority does not meet the criteria 

for a viable and functioning government with all the authority and responsibilities thereof: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives rejects 

2 the ‘‘two-state solution’’ as the United States diplomatic 

3 policy objective and calls for the Administration to advo4 cate for a new approach that prioritizes the State of 

5 Israel’s sovereignty, security, and borders. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
IV 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 360 

Commemorating the 60th anniversary of V–J Day and the end of World 

War II in the Pacific. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 12, 2005 

Mr. STEARNS (for himself, Mr. DUNCAN, Mr. WILSON of South Carolina, Mr. 

BURTON of Indiana, Mr. FEENEY, and Mr. EVANS) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on International 

Relations, and in addition to the Committee on Armed Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

RESOLUTION 

Commemorating the 60th anniversary of V–J Day and the 

end of World War II in the Pacific. 

Whereas the United States entered the Second World War in 

December 1941, following the Japanese attack on Pearl 

Harbor, and over the next four years Americans participated in what was arguably the greatest national endeavor in the Nation’s history; 

Whereas the casualty toll of Americans in the Pacific Theater 

during World War II was approximately 92,904 killed, 

208,333 wounded, and tens of thousands missing in action and prisoners of war, with civilians and military 
2 

•HRES 360 IH 

forces of the Allied Powers suffering equally devastating 

tolls; 

Whereas Japanese military forces and the Japanese civilian 

population also suffered staggering losses; 

Whereas on August 15, 1945, Emperor Hirohito of Japan 

announced the unconditional surrender of Japan’s military forces, made formal on September 2, 1945, aboard 

the U.S.S. Missouri in Tokyo Bay, Japan; thus ending 

the most devastating war in human history; 

Whereas Japan is now a free and prosperous democracy, a 

valued, durable friend based on shared values and mutual 

interests, and a guarantor against despotism and oppression in that area of the world; and 

Whereas the courage and sacrifice of the members of the 

United States Armed Forces and of the military forces 

of the Allied Powers who served valiantly to rescue the 

Pacific nations from tyranny and aggression should always be remembered: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) recognizes the 60th anniversary of V–J Day 

3 and the end of World War II in the Pacific theater; 

4 (2) joins with a grateful Nation in expressing 

5 respect and appreciation to the members of the 

6 United States Armed Forces who served in the Pa7 cific theater during World War II; and 

8 (3) remembers and honors those Americans who 

9 made the ultimate sacrifice and gave their lives for 
3 

•HRES 360 IH 

1 their country during the campaigns in the Pacific 

2 theater during World War II. 

Æ
#### § 52.48 Standards for review of applications.

Applications filed under this subpart will be reviewed for compliance with the standards set out in 10 CFR parts 20, 50 and its appendices, 51, 73, and 100.
H. Res. 50

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

January 26, 2005.

Resolved, That the following named Member be, and is

hereby, elected to the following standing committees of the

House of Representatives:

(1) COMMITTEE ON FINANCIAL SERVICES.—Mr.

Sanders (to rank immediately after Ms. Waters).

(2) COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENT REFORM.—Mr.

Sanders (to rank immediately after Mr. Kanjorski).

Attest:

Clerk.