alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 26
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 26 appear at 87 FR 71455, Nov. 22, 2022.

§ 26.39 Review process for fitness-for-duty policy violations. ( a ) Each licensee and other entity who is subject to this subpart shall establish procedures for the review of a determination that an individual who they employ or who has applied for authorization has violated the FFD policy. The review procedure must provide for an objective and impartial review of the facts related to the determination that the individual has violated the FFD policy.
( b ) The review procedure must provide notice to the individual of the grounds for the determination that the individual has violated the FFD policy, and must provide an opportunity for the individual to respond and submit additional relevant information.
( c ) The review procedure must ensure that the individual who conducts the review is not associated with the administration of the FFD program [*see* the description of FFD program personnel in § 26.4(g)]. Individuals who conduct the review may be management personnel.
( d ) If the review finds in favor of the individual, the licensee or other entity shall update the relevant records to reflect the outcome of the review and delete or correct all information the review found to be inaccurate.
( e ) When a C/V is administering an FFD program on which licensees and other entities rely, and the C/V determines that its employee, subcontractor, or applicant has violated its FFD policy, the C/V shall ensure that the review procedure required in this section is provided to the individual. Licensees and other entities who rely on a C/V's FFD program need not provide the review procedure required in this section to a C/V's employee, subcontractor, or applicant when the C/V is administering its own FFD program and the FFD policy violation was determined under the C/V's program.
[75 FR 73941, Nov. 30, 2010]
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 20 - 0041 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. ERIC D. YEATON,

Defendant and Appellant
.

ORDER Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including June 22 , 20 20 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

May 14 2020

05/14/2020

Case Number: DA 20-0041
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 144 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                        March 10, 2005.
    Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker 
may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XVIII, declare the House resolved into the 
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for further consideration 
of the bill (H.R. 3) to authorize funds for Federal-aid highways, highway safety 
programs, and transit programs, and for other purposes. No further general 
debate (except for the final period contemplated in House Resolution 140) shall 
be in order. No further amendment to the bill, as amended, shall be in order 
except those printed in the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this 
resolution. Each such amendment may be offered only in the order printed in the 
report, may be offered only by a Member designated in the report, shall be 
considered as read, shall be debatable for the time specified in the report 
equally divided and controlled by the proponent and an opponent, shall not be 
subject to amendment, and shall not be subject to a demand for division of the 
question in the House or in the Committee of the Whole. All points of order 
against such amendments are waived. At the conclusion of the final period of 
debate, the Committee shall rise and report the bill, as amended, to the House 
with such further amendments as may have been adopted. The previous question 
shall be considered as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to final 
passage without intervening motion except one motion to recommit with or without 
instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Case 2:06-cv-00756-MHT-WC Document 5 Filed 09/06/2006 Page 1 of 1
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, EASTERN DIVISION

OWEN J. ROGAL, D.D.S., )

P.C. d/b/a THE PAIN CENTER, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

v. ) 3:06cv728-MHT

) 

SKILSTAF, INC., )

)

Defendant. )

 RULE 26(F) ORDER

The parties are reminded of the obligation, imposed

by Rule 26(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, to

confer and to develop a proposed discovery plan.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Rule 26(f) report

containing the discovery plan shall be filed as soon as

practicable but not later than October 13, 2006.

The longstanding practice in this district is that

dispositive motions shall be filed no later than 90 days

prior to the pretrial date. If the parties seek to vary

from that schedule, they should present, in the plan,

specific case-related reasons for the requested variance.

Case 3:06-cv-00728-MHT-WC Document 22 Filed 09/20/2006 Page 1 of 3
2

In their Rule 26(f) report, however, the parties should

assume that the 90-day requirement will apply.

This case will be set for trial before the

undersigned judge during one of that judge's regularly

scheduled civil trial terms, within 7 to 10 months of

this order if a term is available and, if not available,

then as soon as possible thereafter. The pretrial date

is normally set within four to six weeks of a scheduled

trial term. The dates of each judge's civil trial terms

are available on the court's website located at

<http://almd.uscourts.gov> in the civil case information

section.

The court may or may not hold a scheduling conference

before issuing a scheduling order. If the court holds a

scheduling conference, counsel may participate in the

scheduling conference by conference call.

The scheduling order entered by the court will follow

the form of the Uniform Scheduling Order adopted by the

Case 3:06-cv-00728-MHT-WC Document 22 Filed 09/20/2006 Page 2 of 3
judges of this court. The Uniform Scheduling Order is

also available on the court's website.

The report of the parties should comply with Form 35

of the Appendix of Forms to the Federal Rules of Civil

Procedure.

DONE, this the 20th day of September, 2006.

 /s/ Myron H. Thompson 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-00728-MHT-WC Document 22 Filed 09/20/2006 Page 3 of 3
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 (AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

In connection with Quarterly Report of Sionix Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David R. Wells, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to my knowledge and in my capacity as an officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and,

2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.

Date: January 13, 2010

| |                                                                                                       
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |                                                                                                       
| |                                                                                                       
| | /s/ David R. Wells                                                                                    
| | David R. Wells                                                                                        
| | President, Chief Financial Officer, Assistant Secretary and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer



A certification furnished pursuant to this Item will not be deemed filed for purposes of section 18 of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78r), or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the registrant specifically incorporates it by reference.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION

J.B., a minor child, by and )

through his next friend, )

Addie Ward, on behalf of )

himself and all others )

similarly situated, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

v. ) 2:06cv755-MHT

) 

WALTER WOOD, in his )

individual capacity, )

)

Defendant. )

J.B., a minor child, by and )

through his next friend, )

Addie Ward, on behalf of )

himself and all others )

similarly situated, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

v. ) 2:06cv908-MHT

) 

WALTER WOOD, in his )

individual capacity, )

)

Defendant. )

Case 2:06-cv-00755-MHT-CSC Document 75 Filed 11/28/2007 Page 1 of 2
ORDER

Pursuant to the pretrial order (Doc. No. 69) in which

the parties agreed to the resolution of this case on the

record without a trial, it is ORDERED that the motion to

suppress (Doc. No. 43) is denied. 

DONE, this the 28th day of November, 2007.

 /s/ Myron H. Thompson 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00755-MHT-CSC Document 75 Filed 11/28/2007 Page 2 of 2
PGI 225.770-5 Waiver of prohibition.

(c) Send a copy of the report to the Office of the Principal Director, Defense Pricing and Contracting

(Contract Policy) (DPC/CP) via email at osd.pentagon.ousd-a-s.mbx.asda-dp-ccontractpolicy@mail.mil.

Parent topic: PGI 225.770 Prohibition on acquisition of certain items from Communist Chinese

military companies.
#### § 600.19 Notification to unsuccessful applicants.

DOE shall promptly notify in writing each applicant whose application has not been selected for award or whose application cannot be funded because of the unavailability of appropriated funds. If the application was not selected, the written notice shall explain why the application was not selected.

[61 FR 7166, Feb. 26, 1996, as amended at 74 FR 44276, Aug. 28, 2009]
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, EASTERN DIVISION

GREGORY MONTAE FERGERSON, )

)

Petitioner, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

v. ) 3:06cv777-MHT

) (WO) 

WARDEN KENNETH JONES, )

et al., )

)

Defendants. )

JUDGMENT

In accordance with the memorandum opinion entered

this date, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the

court as follows:

(1) The petitioner's objections (Doc. No. 22) are

overruled.

(2) The United States Magistrate Judge's

recommendation (Doc. No. 20) is adopted.

(3) The petitioner’s motion to dismiss allegation

(Doc. No. 17) is granted.

Case 3:06-cv-00777-MHT-TFM Document 24 Filed 03/31/09 Page 1 of 2
(4) The petition for writ of habeas corpus (Doc. No.

1) is denied.

It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against

petitioner, for which execution may issue.

The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this

document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant

to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

DONE, this the 31st day of March, 2009.

 /s/ Myron H. Thompson 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-00777-MHT-TFM Document 24 Filed 03/31/09 Page 2 of 2
#### § 440.24 Recordkeeping.

Each grantee or subgrantee receiving Federal financial assistance under this part shall keep such records as DOE shall require, including records which fully disclose the amount and disposition by each grantee and subgrantee of the funds received, the total cost of a weatherization project or the total expenditure to implement the State plan for which assistance was given or used, the source and amount of funds for such project or program not supplied by DOE, the average costs incurred in weatherization of individual dwelling units, the average size of the dwelling being weatherized, the average income of households receiving assistance under this part, and such other records as DOE deems necessary for an effective audit and performance evaluation. Such recordkeeping shall be in accordance with the DOE Financial Assistance Rule, 10 CFR part 600, and any further requirements of this part.

[58 FR 12529, Mar. 4, 1993]
§ 600.351 Termination. ( a ) Awards may be terminated in whole or in part only in accordance with one of the following: ( 1 ) By the contracting officer, if a recipient materially fails to comply with the terms and conditions of an award.
( 2 ) By the contracting officer with the consent of the recipient, in which case the two parties must agree upon the termination conditions, including the effective date and, in the case of partial termination, the portion to be terminated.
( 3 ) By the recipient upon sending to the contracting officer written notification setting forth the reasons for such termination, the effective date, and, in the case of partial termination, the portion to be terminated. The recipient must provide such notice at least 30 calendar days prior to the effective date of the termination. However, if the contracting officer determines in the case of partial termination that the reduced or modified portion of the award will not accomplish the purposes for which the award was made, he or she may terminate the award in its entirety.
( b ) If the recipient incurred allowable costs prior to the termination, the responsibilities of the recipient referred to in § 600.361(b), including those related to property, apply to the termination of the award, and provision must be made for continuing responsibilities of the recipient after termination, as appropriate.
Exhibit 32.2
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                               ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Certification of CFO

In connection with the Quarterly Report of the United States  Basketball  League
(the  "Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period  ended  August 31, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, Richard C.  Meisenheimer,  Chief Financial  Officer of the Company,  certify,
pursuant to Section 18 U.S.C.  1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


   /s/ Richard C. Meisenheimer                                 October 17, 2003
   -------------------
     Richard C. Meisenheimer
     Chief Executive Officer



     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
     other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
     signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
     written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company
     and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
     Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

     This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section
     906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent
     required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
     Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended  (the
     "Exchange Act").  Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated
     by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended,
     or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically
     incorporates it by reference.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 41 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 41

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that a day should 
be established as ``National Tartan Day'' to recognize the outstanding 
achievements and contributions made by Scottish-Americans to the United 
                                States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 25, 2005

   Mr. McIntyre (for himself and Mr. Duncan) submitted the following 
  resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that a day should 
be established as ``National Tartan Day'' to recognize the outstanding 
achievements and contributions made by Scottish-Americans to the United 
                                States.

Whereas April 6 has a special significance for all Americans, and especially 
        those Americans of Scottish descent, because the Declaration of 
        Arbroath, the Scottish Declaration of Independence, was signed on April 
        6, 1320, and the American Declaration of Independence was modeled in 
        part on that inspirational document;
Whereas this resolution honors the major role that Scottish-Americans played in 
        the founding of the Nation, such as the fact that almost half of the 
        signers of the Declaration of Independence were of Scottish descent, the 
        Governors in 9 of the original 13 States were of Scottish ancestry, and 
        Scottish-Americans successfully helped shape the Nation in its formative 
        years and guide it through its most troubled times;
Whereas this resolution recognizes the monumental achievements and invaluable 
        contributions made by Scottish-Americans that have led to America's 
        preeminence in the fields of science, technology, medicine, government, 
        politics, economics, architecture, literature, media, and visual and 
        performing arts;
Whereas this resolution commends the more than 200 organizations throughout the 
        United States that honor Scottish heritage, tradition, and culture, 
        representing the hundreds of thousands of Americans of Scottish descent, 
        residing in every State, who already have made the observance of Tartan 
        Day on April 6 a success; and
Whereas these numerous individuals, clans, societies, clubs, and fraternal 
        organizations do not let the great contributions of the Scottish people 
        go unnoticed: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved,  That it is the sense of the House of Representatives 
that a day should be established as ``National Tartan Day'' to 
recognize the outstanding achievements and contributions made by 
Scottish-Americans to the United States.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 431.241 Purpose and scope.

This subpart contains energy conservation requirements for unit heaters, pursuant to Part B of Title III of the Energy Policy and Conservation Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 6291-6309.
§ 501.183 Citizen suits. ( a ) *General.* A person who believes he is aggrieved by the failure of OFE to perform any nondiscretionary act of duty under the Act may file a Petition for Action for OFE to take such action as he may feel to be proper. This petition must be filed at the address provided in § 501.11. The petition must specify the action requested and set forth the facts and legal arguments that constitute the basis for the request. The filing of a Petition for Action will serve as notice to OFE under FUA section 725(b) for purposes of any citizens suit that may be subsequently filed.
( b ) *OFE decision.* Within sixty (60) days of receiving the Petition for Action, OFE will notify the person giving notice under this section that it has instituted the action requested or that other described action is being taken, or that other described action is being taken, or that no action is being taken and the reasons therefor.
Editorial Note on Part 51
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 51 appear at 80 FR 74980, Dec. 1, 2015.

§ 51.32 Finding of no significant impact. ( a ) A finding of no significant impact will: ( 1 ) Identify the proposed action;
( 2 ) State that the Commission has determined not to prepare an environmental impact statement for the proposed action;
( 3 ) Briefly present the reasons why the proposed action will not have a significant effect on the quality of the human environment;
( 4 ) Include the environmental assessment or a summary of the environmental assessment. If the assessment is included, the finding need not repeat any of the discussion in the assessment but may incorporate it by reference;
( 5 ) Note any other related environmental documents; and
( 6 ) State that the finding and any related environmental documents are available for public inspection and where the documents may be inspected.
( b ) The Commission finds that there is no significant environmental impact associated with the issuance of: ( 1 ) A standard design certification under subpart B of part 52 of this chapter;
( 2 ) An amendment to a design certification;
( 3 ) A manufacturing license under subpart F of part 52 of this chapter; or
( 4 ) An amendment to a manufacturing license.
[49 FR 9381, Mar. 12, 1984, as amended at 72 FR 49511, Aug. 28, 2007]
EXHIBIT 32.1










Certification of Periodic Financial Report








Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, Thomas M. Patton, the President and Chief Executive Officer, and Jeffery A. Baird, the Chief Financial Officer of CAS Medical Systems, Inc. (the “issuer”), do hereby certify that the report on Form 10-Q accompanying this certification (the “report”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the issuer.











/s/ Thomas M. Patton


-----------------------------------------------------------


Thomas M. Patton


President and Chief Executive Officer


CAS Medical Systems, Inc.





November 10, 2010














/s/ Jeffery A. Baird


-----------------------------------------------------------


Jeffery A. Baird


Chief Financial Officer


CAS Medical Systems, Inc.





November 10, 2010