alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case 2:06-mc-03334-MHT Document 5 Filed 10/04/2006 Page 1 of 9
Case 2:06-mc-03334-MHT Document 5 Filed 10/04/2006 Page 2 of 9
Case 2:06-mc-03334-MHT Document 5 Filed 10/04/2006 Page 3 of 9
Case 2:06-mc-03334-MHT Document 5 Filed 10/04/2006 Page 4 of 9
Case 2:06-mc-03334-MHT Document 5 Filed 10/04/2006 Page 5 of 9
Case 2:06-mc-03334-MHT Document 5 Filed 10/04/2006 Page 6 of 9
Case 2:06-mc-03334-MHT Document 5 Filed 10/04/2006 Page 7 of 9
Case 2:06-mc-03334-MHT Document 5 Filed 10/04/2006 Page 8 of 9
Case 2:06-mc-03334-MHT Document 5 Filed 10/04/2006 Page 9 of 9
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 396 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 396

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                         July 28, 2005.
    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider the conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 2985) making 
appropriations for the Legislative Branch for the fiscal year ending September 
30, 2006, and for other purposes. All points of order against the conference 
report and against its consideration are waived. The conference report shall be 
considered as read.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Exhibit No. 32.1   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with this report of Questar Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Ronald W. Jibson, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  QUESTAR CORPORATION   May 6, 2011 /s/Ronald W. Jibson Ronald W. Jibson President and Chief Executive Officer
#### In the Matter of Alfred R. Fazio, Respondent, v. James M. Power et al., Constituting the Board of Elections of the City of New York, Respondents, and Rowland P. Hanley, Appellant.

Order entered on June 8, 1970, affirmed, without costs and without disbursements, on the opinion of Davidson, J., at Special Term. Concur — Capozzoli, Markewich and Tilzer, JJ.; Eager, J. P., and Steuer, J., dissent in the memorandum by Steuer, J.

Steuer, J.

(dissenting): We would reverse and dismiss the petition. The respondent’s designating petition for male Assembly District Leader, 80th Assembly District, Bronx County, contained more than the required number of signatures. This is true even if the signatures attested to by respondent’s brother and sister are excluded. Special Term found that the entire petition was permeated by fraud.

The principle behind the rule which enables the court to reject a petition even though it contains the required number of valid signatures is that proof of actual fraud allows the inference that similar tactics would, if discovered, invalidate other signatures not otherwise challenged (see *Matter of Weisberger*v. *Cohen,*260 App. Div. 392, 393). Invalidating the petition is not punitive, nor could a determination based on that ground be sustained under the Election Law.

We do not believe that the facts relied on by Special Term establish fraud in the sense in which that word is used in matters of this nature. It was indeed established that several sheets of respondent’s petition were attested by his brother and sister. We agree with Special Term that these attesting witnesses were not residents of the Assembly District and that they and the candidate knew where they actually lived. However, the address within the District given by them was of a dwelling then unoccupied. They and respondent owned an interest in the building. There was uncontradicted evidence that they intended to make it their home at a later date. While this would not qualify as evidence of domicile it does at least raise a question whether there was a deliberate attempt to defraud.

Moreover, this was not the type of wrongful conduct from which courts have drawn the inference of permeating fraud. (Attestation by the candidate of over 100 forged signatures, and similar attestations by others *[Matter of Weisberger*v. *Cohen,*supra]; several instances of invalid attestations with proof of evasion by attesting witnesses *[Matter of Aronson*v. *Power,*22 N Y 2d 759].)

Believing as we do that no inference of fraud permeating the petition can be drawn, the invalidation of the petition amounts to a disenfranchisement of those others who signed the petition, and as such is impermissible *(Matter of Lefkowitz*v. *Cohen, 262*App. Div. 452, 456, affd. 286 N. Y. 499).
-86 -84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72 -70

32 34 36 38 40 42 

### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 

### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 1000 18 12 06 00 06/07 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 07 Jun 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.92 N 77.01 WMeters AGL
exv10w32






Exhibit 10.32




Amendment to the

The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.

Management Supplemental

Death & Disability Benefits Plan




     The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Management Supplemental Death & Disability
Benefits Plan (the “Plan”) is amended, effective as
of January 1, 2010, as follows:




	 	1.	 	Article IV of the Plan his hereby amended to delete the first sentence of
Section 4.01 and to insert the following in place thereof:
	 
	 	 	 	“In the event of the death of a Member prior to the date of his Retirement or a
Disabled Member prior to his Normal Retirement Date, the Beneficiary of the Member or
Disabled Member shall be entitled to receive a lump-sum Death Benefit within sixty
days following the date of death.”
	 
	 	2.	 	Except as set forth above, the Plan remains in full force and effect.
§ 501.163 OFE evaluation. ( a ) The record shall consist of the complaint and any supporting documents and all other relevant information developed in the course of any investigations or proceedings related to that complaint. OFE may investigate and corroborate any statement in the complaint or related documents submitted, and may utilize in its evaluation any relevant facts obtained by such investigation or from any other source of information. OFE may solicit or accept submissions from third persons relevant to the complaint or other related documents.
( b ) *Confidentiality of information.* OFE will treat as confidential information received in any investigation of a complaint, including the identity of the complainant and the identity of any other persons who provide information to the extent such information is exempt from public disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. 552. OFE reserves the right to make disclosures that would be in the public interest.
37.270 Acquisition of audit services.    (a) *General policy.*       (S-90) See 8.003(S-90) for acquisition of audit readiness and/or audit sustainment services. **Parent topic:** SUBPART 37.2 – ADVISORY AND ASSISTANCE SERVICES
- Home
-  ›  Legal resources 
-  ›  Statutes 

# Statutes

    The FEC administers and enforces the Federal Election Campaign Act, the    Presidential Election Campaign Fund Act and the Presidential Primary    Matching Payment Account Act. Those acts and amendments, which are passed    by Congress and signed by the President, are collected and restated as law    in Title 52 and Title 26 of the U.S. Code.  

Examples: contribution; 52; 30123

## Full text of statutes

      Specifically, the FEC interprets and enforces the statutes found in Title 52, Subtitle III and Title 26, Subtitle H. There are two options for accessing these statutes:    
        -  Access the FEC’s compilation of statutes. That PDF contains Title 52, Subtitle III, Title 26, Subtitle H and additional provisions of the U.S. Code that aren’t enforced by FEC but are relevant to people involved in federal elections.  Federal Election Campaign Laws by the FEC(2.97MB PDF)     
        -  Access the Government Printing Office (GPO) version of Title 52, Subtitle III and Title 26, Subtitle H.  Title 52, Voting and Elections, GPO(395KB PDF)    Title 26, Internal Revenue Code, GPO(197KB PDF)     
        
This information is not intended to replace the law or to change its meaning, nor does this information create or confer any rights for or on any person or bind the Federal Election Commission or the public.

The reader is encouraged also to consult the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, as amended (52 U.S.C. 30101 et seq.), Commission regulations (Title 11 of the Code of Federal Regulations), Commission advisory opinions and applicable court decisions.

        -  About 
-  Careers 
-  Press 
-  Contact 
-  Privacy and security policy 
-  Plain language 
-  Accessibility statement 
-  Strategy, budget and performance 
-  No FEAR Act 
-  Open government 
-  Protected Voices 
-  USA.gov 
-  Inspector General 
-  FOIA 
-  OpenFEC API 
-  GitHub repository 
-  Release notes 
-  FEC.gov status 

        
Federal Election Commission
-  The FEC's Twitter page 
-  The FEC's YouTube page 
Sign up for FECMail
This information is produced and disseminated at U.S. taxpayer expense.

        Hide glossaryGlossarySearch termsExamples: receipt; Hybrid PAC
§ 205.199C Appeals of remedial order to FERC. ( a ) The person to whom a Remedial Order is issued by the Office of Hearings and Appeals may file an administrative appeal if the Remedial Order proceeding was initiated by a Notice of Probable Violation issued after October 1, 1977, or, in those situations in which no Notice of Probable Violation was issued, if the proceeding was initiated by a Proposed Remedial Order issued after October 1, 1977.
( b ) Any such appeal must be initiated within 30 days after service of the Order by giving written notice to the Office of Hearings and Appeals that the person to whom a Remedial Order is issued wishes to contest the Order.
( c ) The Office of Hearings and Appeals shall promptly advise the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission of its receipt of a notice described in paragraph (b) of this section.
( d ) The Office of Hearings and Appeals may, on a case by case basis, set reasonable time limits for the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to complete its action on such an appeal proceeding.
( e ) In order to exhaust administrative remedies, a person who is entitled to appeal a Remedial Order issued by the Office of Hearings and Appeals must file a timely appeal and await a decision on the merits. Any Remedial Order that is not appealed within the 30-day period shall become effective as a final Order of the DOE and is not subject to review by any court.
#### State of Kansas, *Appellee,*v. Randy L. Wilcox, *Appellant.*

No. 47,896

Opinion filed January 24, 1976.

*Michael D. Wilson,*of Alkire, Clausing & Wilkinson, of Wichita, was on the brief for the appellant.

*Curt T. Schneider,*attorney general, *Keith Sanborn,*district attorney, and *Stephen M. Joseph,*assistant district attorney, were on the brief for the appellee.

*Per Curiam:*

Affirmed.
#### § 984.65 Compliance.

Except as provided in this subpart, no person shall handle walnuts, inshell or shelled, during any marketing year in which this subpart and any regulations issued by the Secretary hereunder are in effect, unless such person has previously met the obligations imposed by each such regulation and the provisions of this subpart.
#### § 50.13 Attacks and destructive acts by enemies of the United States; and defense activities.

An applicant for a license to construct and operate a production or utilization facility, or for an amendment to such license, is not required to provide for design features or other measures for the specific purpose of protection against the effects of (a) attacks and destructive acts, including sabotage, directed against the facility by an enemy of the United States, whether a foreign government or other person, or (b) use or deployment of weapons incident to U.S. defense activities.

[32 FR 13445, Sept. 26, 1967]
#### § 60.5 Interpretations.

Except as specifically authorized by the Commission, in writing, no interpretation of the meaning of the regulations in this part by any officer or employee of the Commission other than a written interpretation by the General Counsel will be considered binding upon the Commission.
MINUTES

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION

W. HAROLD ALBRITTON, SENIOR U. S. DISTRICT JUDGE, PRESIDING, AT MONTGOMERY, AL

DATE COMMENCED: March 22, 2007 AT: 10:35 a.m. 

DATE COMPLETED: March 22, 2007 AT: 10:47 a.m.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

 ) 

vs. ) CR. No. 2:06cr200-WHA

 )

HECTOR R. SILVA )

____________________________________________________________________________________________

APPEARANCES:

GOVERNMENT DEFENDANT

Christopher Snyder Matthew Teague

____________________________________________________________________________________________

COURT OFFICIALS PRESENT

Risa Entrekin, Court Reporter Jakki Caple, USPO

Elna Behrman, Courtroom Deputy Scott Wright, USPO 

Lisa Harden, Law Clerk Beverly Childress, Interpreter

COURTROOM PROCEEDINGS

 (X) SENTENCING HEARING

Hearing commences. 

Interpreter is sworn.

Government makes oral Motion for Reduction in Criminal Offense Level for Acceptance of Responsibility.

Court orally GRANTS the Motion for Reduction.

Defendant is sworn.

Parties have reviewed the presentence report and have no objections.

The court adopts the factual statements contained in the presentence report.

Defendant’s attorney speaks in mitigation and requests sentence at low end of guidelines and further

requests Defendant be placed in a facility in Texas.

Court states it makes no recommendation as to placement and suggests counsel make that request to the

Bureau of Prisons. 

Sentence is stated.

No objections to statement of sentence.

Sentence is ORDERED imposed as stated.

Defendant waives his right to appeal.

Defendant is recommitted to the custody of the U. S. Marshal.

Court is adjourned.

Case 2:06-cr-00200-WHA-CSC Document 98 Filed 03/22/2007 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

SANDI PHILLIPS AND RONALD §

J. PHILLIPS, §

§

Plaintiffs, §

§ Civil Action No.

v. §

§ 3:06-CV-00744-SRW

ST. PAUL TRAVELERS INSURANCE §

COMPANY, §

§

Defendant. §

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

COMES NOW the undersigned and gives notice of her appearance as additional counsel of

record for The Automobile Insurance Company of Hartford Connecticut, the defendant improperly

identified in Plaintiffs’ Complaint as “Travelers,” in the above case.

/s/ Candace L. Hudson

Candace L. Hudson (#8314-N66H)

One of the Attorneys for Defendant Travelers

Commercial Insurance incorrectlyidentified in

Plaintiffs’ Complaint as “St. Paul Travelers

Insurance Company”

OF COUNSEL:

ELY & ISENBERG, LLC

600 Beacon Parkway West

Suite 104

Birmingham, AL 35209

Telephone: (205) 313-1200

Facsimile: (205) 313-1201

Case 3:06-cv-00744-SRW Document 11 Filed 02/02/2007 Page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I do hereby certify that a true and accurate copy of the foregoing has been on all parties of

record by:

Hand Delivery

U.S. Mail

Overnight Delivery

Facsimile

X E-File

on this the 2nd day of February, 2007.

/s/ Candace L. Hudson

OF COUNSEL

cc:

James R. McKoon, Jr.

McKoon & Thomas

Post Office Box 3220

Phenix City, Alabama 36868-3220

Case 3:06-cv-00744-SRW Document 11 Filed 02/02/2007 Page 2 of 2
Subpart 1904.70 - Procurement Requests

Parent topic: PART 1904 - ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS

1904.7001 General.

(a) Procurement requests will be prepared and submitted to the contracting office in accordance

with Board procedures.

(b) Except in unusual circumstances, the contracting office will not issue solicitations until an

approved procurement request, containing a certification that funds are available, has been

received. However, the contracting office may take all necessary actions up to the point of contract

award prior to the receipt of the approved procurement request certifying that funds are available

when:

(1) Such action is necessary to meet critical program schedules;

(2) It has been established that program authority has been issued and that funds to cover the

acquisition will be available prior to the date set for contract award or contract modification;

(3) A person at a level above the contracting officer authorizes such action prior to the issuance of

the solicitation, and the contract file is properly documented; and

(4) The solicitation document clearly indicates that the award is subject to the availability of funds.

(c) The procurement request shall be assigned within the contracting office to an individual who, if

not the contracting officer, will be responsible to the contracting officer for conducting the business

aspects of the transaction. This individual shall review the request to ensure that it complies with

the FAR and this Regulation and that the information contained in the request is in sufficient detail

to prepare presolicitation and solicitation documents. The contracting officer, or other designated

individual in the contracting office, shall discuss uncertain requirements or inconsistencies in the

procurement request with the initiator of the request and obtain clarification prior to taking any

further action.
#### § 603.1115 Single audits.

For audits of for-profit participant's systems, under §§ 603.640 through 603.660, the contracting officer is the focal point for ensuring that participants submit audit reports and for resolving any findings in those reports. The contracting officer's responsibilities regarding single audits of nonprofit participant's systems are identified in the DOE “Guide to Financial Assistance.”
SUBCHAPTER B—ACQUISITION PLANNING

PART 1205—PUBLICIZING CONTRACT ACTIONS

PART 1206—COMPETITION REQUIREMENTS

PART 1207—ACQUISITION PLANNING

PART 1209—CONTRACTOR QUALIFICATIONS

PART 1211—DESCRIBING AGENCY NEEDS

PART 1212—ACQUISITION OF COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS AND COMMERCIAL

SERVICES

PART 1205—PUBLICIZING CONTRACT ACTIONS

Subpart 1205.1—Dissemination of Information

1205.101 Methods of disseminating information.

Subpart 1205.4—Release of Information

1205.402 General public.

1205.403 Requests from Members of Congress.

Subpart 1205.6—Publicizing Multi-Agency Use Contracts

1205.601 Governmentwide database of contracts.

PART 1206—COMPETITION REQUIREMENTS

Subpart 1206.2—Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources

1206.202 Establishing or maintaining alternative sources.

Subpart 1206.3—Other Than Full and Open Competition

1206.302 Circumstances permitting other than full and open competition.

1206.302-1 Only one responsible source and no other supplies or services will

satisfy agency requirements.

1206.302-7 Public interest.

Subpart 1206.5—Advocates for Competition

1206.501 Requirement.

PART 1207—ACQUISITION PLANNING

Subpart 1207.3—Contractor Versus Government Performance

1207.305 Solicitation provisions and contract clause.

PART 1209—CONTRACTOR QUALIFICATIONS

Subpart 1209.4—Debarment, Suspension, and Ineligibility

1209.400 Scope of subpart.

1209.403 Definitions.

1209.405 Effect of listing.

1209.405-1 Continuation of current contracts.

1209.405-2 Restrictions on subcontracting.

1209.406 Debarment.

1209.406-1 General.

1209.406-3 Procedures.

1209.406-4 Period of debarment.

1209.407 Suspension.

1209.407-1 General.

1209.407-3 Procedures.

1209.470 Fact-finding procedures.

1209.471 Appeals.

Subpart 1209.5—Organizational and Consultant Conflicts of Interest

1209.507 Solicitation provisions and contract clause.
1209.507-270 Contract clauses.

Subpart 1209.6—Contractor Team Arrangements

1209.602 General.

PART 1211—DESCRIBING AGENCY NEEDS

Subpart 1211.2—Using and Maintaining Requirements Documents

1211.204 Solicitation provisions and contract clauses.

1211.204-70 Contract clauses.

PART 1212—ACQUISITION OF COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS AND COMMERCIAL SERVICES

Subpart 1212.3—Solicitation Provisions and Contract Clauses for the Acquisition of

Commercial Products and Commercial Services

1212.301 Solicitation provisions and contract clauses for the acquisition of

commercial products and commercial services.
Subpart 2841.2 - Acquiring Utility Services

Parent topic: PART 2841 - ACQUISITION OF UTILITY SERVICES

2841.201 Policy.

The HCA or designee is the agency head for the purposes of FAR 41.201(d)(2)(i) and (d)(3).
#### § 602.15 Indirect cost limitations.

Awards issued under this part for conferences and scientific/technical meetings will not include payment for indirect costs.
#### In re WARREN et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

January 20, 1915.)

In the matter of the application of Arthur Warren and others, as taxpayers of the Town of Brighton, etc.

No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs.
§ 470.17 General requirements. ( a ) Except where this part provides otherwise, the submission, evaluation and selection for support of proposals under the program and the entering into and administration of grants, cooperative agreements, and contracts under the program, shall be governed by the provisions of DOE-AR and DOE-PR are applicable, such other procedures applicable to grants, cooperative agreements, and contracts under the program as DOE may from time to time prescribe, and any Federal requirements applicable to grants, cooperative agreements, and contracts under the program.
( b ) Each grant, cooperative agreement or contract under this part shall require that a recipient of support under the program shall submit a full written report of activities supported in whole or in part by Federal funds made available under the program and shall contain any additional report provisions and other provisions dealing with records, allowable expenses, accounting practices, publication and publicity, copyrights, patents, discrimination, conflict of interest, insurance, safety, changes, resolution of disputes and other standard and/or relevant support agreements requirements required by, or appropriate to, the needs of the program.
#### In re LOEBL.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

November 27, *10941914.)

In the matter of Milton T. Loebl, an attorney.

No opinion. Motion granted. Settle order on notice. See, also, 148 N. Y. Supp. 1127.