alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
See Doc. #39 (“All pretrial motions under Fed.R.Crim.P. 12(b) and (d) 14 and 16, and all 1

notices under Fed. R. Crim. P. 12.1, 12.2, and 12.2 . . . must be filed no later than

September 22, 2006.”).

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

 )

 v. ) CR. NO. 2:06-cr-200-WHA

 )

ROSA RINCON )

)

United States’ Response in Opposition to Defendant Rincon’s Motion for Leave

The United States opposes Defendant Rosa Rincon’s Second Motion for Leave to

file Additional Motions and Defenses. Rincon filed the Motion on November 17,

2006–nearly two months after this Court’s deadline for filing such a Motion. 

In the Order on Arraignment in this case, issued almost three months ago, this

Court set the deadline for Motions under Fed. R. Crim. P. 12 for September 22, 2006.1

Not only did Rincon fail to file the Motion in the time required, but Rincon did not even

orally mention that such a Motion or defense was even likely during either her initial

appearance on July 14, 2006, her detention hearing on July 21, 2006, her arraignment on

September 1, 2006, or her pre-trial hearing on September 24, 2006. Instead, Rincon filed

her Motion only last Friday, November 17, 2006, nearly two month late. 

Case 2:06-cr-00200-WHA-CSC Document 73 Filed 11/20/2006 Page 1 of 3
 Doc. # 65. 2

-2-

This Motion for Leave is vastly different than the one just filed by Ricon’s codefendant, Hector Silva. In Silva’s Motion for Leave to File a Motion to Suppress, Silva 2

noted that his attorney had passed away and that his son had only recently taken the case

for his father. In between, Silva had a third attorney, who served for only a brief time. 

Thus, the delay in filing the Motion to Suppress in that case was warranted, and the

United States did not oppose the request. Here, however, Rincon has been represented by

the same attorney throughout these proceedings. There has been no justifiable reason for

this delay. 

The United States therefore asks that this Court deny Rincon’s Motion for Leave

and disallow the use of any evidence related to her “Notice” of Affirmative Defenses. 

Such an approach is appropriate in this case. Rincon had every opportunity to file such a

motion in time, but did not do so. There is no legal reason to permit her to file it now.

 Respectfully submitted this 20th day of November, 2006,

LEURA G. CANARY

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

/s/ Christopher Snyder 

CHRISTOPHER A. SNYDER

Assistant United States Attorney

One Court Square, Suite 201

Montgomery, AL 36104

Phone: (334) 223-7280

Fax: (334) 223-7135

E-mail: christopher.a.snyder@usdoj.gov

Case 2:06-cr-00200-WHA-CSC Document 73 Filed 11/20/2006 Page 2 of 3
-3-

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on November 20, 2006, I electronically filed the foregoing

with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system, which will send notification of

such filing to the following: Jay Lewis.

/s/ Christopher Snyder 

CHRISTOPHER A. SNYDER

Assistant United States Attorney

Case 2:06-cr-00200-WHA-CSC Document 73 Filed 11/20/2006 Page 3 of 3
exhibit10-21.htm


    Exhibit
10.21

     

    BASED
SALARIES OF NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

     

     

    
      	
              Executive Officer

            	
              2010 Base Salaries*

            
	
               

              Steven
      L. Newman

                  
      President and
      Chief Executive
      Officer

               

            	
               

              $900,000

               

            
	
               

              Ricardo
      H. Rosa

                  
      Senior Vice President
      and Chief Financial Officer

            	
               

              $450,000

            
	
               

              Eric
      B. Brown

                  
      Senior Vice President
      and General Counsel

            	
               

              $468,000

               

            
	
               

              Arnaud
      A.Y. Bobillier

                  
      Executive Vice
      President, Assets

            	
               

              $392,000

               

            


    

     

    *Mr.
Newman’s base salary is effective March 1, 2010, the remaining named executive
officers’ base salaries were
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 543 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 543

  Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 55) 
    requiring the President to develop and implement a plan for the 
          withdrawal of United States Armed Forces from Iraq.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            November 9, 2005

Mr. Abercrombie submitted the following resolution; which was referred 
                       to the Committee on Rules

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 55) 
    requiring the President to develop and implement a plan for the 
          withdrawal of United States Armed Forces from Iraq.

    Resolved, That immediately after the adoption of this resolution 
the Speaker shall, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XVIII, declare the 
House resolved into the Committee of the Whole House on the state of 
the Union for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 55) 
requiring the President to develop and implement a plan for the 
withdrawal of United States Armed Forces from Iraq. All points of order 
against consideration of the joint resolution are waived. After a first 
reading of the joint resolution, general debate shall be confined to 
the joint resolution and shall not exceed 17 hours equally divided and 
controlled by the majority leader and minority leader or their 
designees. After general debate the joint resolution shall be 
considered for amendment under the five-minute rule. The joint 
resolution shall be considered as read. At the conclusion of 
consideration of the joint resolution for amendment the Committee shall 
rise and report the joint resolution to the House with such amendments 
as may have been adopted. The previous question shall be considered as 
ordered on the joint resolution and amendments thereto to final passage 
without intervening motion except one motion to recommit with or 
without instructions.
    Sec. 2. If the Committee of the Whole rises and reports that it has 
come to no resolution on the joint resolution, then on the next 
legislative day the House shall, immediately after the third daily 
order of business under clause 1 of rule XIV, resolve into the 
Committee of the Whole for further consideration of the joint 
resolution.
                                 <all>
```
§ 603.1280 Institution of higher education. An educational institution that: ( a ) Meets the criteria in section 101 of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1001); and
( b ) Is subject to the provisions of OMB Circular A-110, “Administrative Requirements for Grants and Agreements with Institutions of Higher Education, Hospitals, and Other Non-Profit Organizations,” as implemented by the Department of Energy at 10 CFR 600, Subpart B.
§ 52.155 Filing of applications. ( a ) Any person, except one excluded by 10 CFR 50.38, may file an application for a manufacturing license under this subpart with the Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation.
( b ) The application must comply with the applicable filing requirements of §§ 52.3 and 50.30 of this chapter.
( c ) The fees associated with the filing and review of the application are set forth in 10 CFR part 170.
[72 FR 49517, Aug. 28, 2007, as amended at 84 FR 65645, Nov. 29, 2019]
PGI 215.470 Estimated data prices.

(b)(i) The form and the provision included in the solicitation request the offeror to state what portion

of the total price is estimated to be attributable to the production or development of the listed data

for the Government (not to the sale of rights in the data). However, offerors' estimated prices may

not reflect all such costs; and different offerors may reflect these costs in a different manner, for the

following reasons—

(A) Differences in business practices in competitive situations;

(B) Differences in accounting systems among offerors;

(C) Use of factors or rates on some portions of the data;

(D) Application of common effort to two or more data items; and

(E) Differences in data preparation methods among offerors.

(ii) Data price estimates should not be used for contract pricing purposes without further analysis.

Parent topic: PGI 215.4 - CONTRACT PRICING
IV 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 390

Congratulating Lance Armstrong on his seventh Tour de France victory 

and his retirement and recognizing his dedication to helping others. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 26, 2005

Mr. SMITH of Texas (for himself, Mr. DOGGETT, Mr. CARTER, and Mr. 

MCCAUL of Texas) submitted the following resolution; which was referred 

to the Committee on Government Reform 

RESOLUTION

Congratulating Lance Armstrong on his seventh Tour de 

France victory and his retirement and recognizing his 

dedication to helping others.

Whereas on July 24, 2005, Lance Armstrong won the Tour 

de France, the most prestigious race in competitive cycling; 

Whereas Lance Armstrong competed against the world’s best 

cyclists for three weeks, covering more than 2,000 miles 

of difficult and imposing terrain in France and Germany 

through changing weather conditions; 

Whereas his victory in 2005 is the seventh Tour de France 

win for Lance Armstrong, establishing a new record for 

the event; 
2

•HRES 390 IH 

Whereas Lance Armstrong overcame seemingly insurmountable challenges in life to reach the pinnacle of his cycling 

career; 

Whereas Lance Armstrong’s achievements are proof that 

hard work and perseverance can turn dreams into reality; 

Whereas after his victory Lance Armstrong announced that 

he will retire from the sport; 

Whereas Lance Armstrong has demonstrated the same level 

of commitment to improving and enriching the lives of 

fellow cancer survivors as he has in training for the Tour 

de France; and 

Whereas his devotion to providing cancer survivors with the 

tools and knowledge to live strong through the Lance 

Armstrong Foundation is recognized throughout the 

United States and the world: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives con2 gratulates Lance Armstrong on his seventh Tour de 

3 France victory and his well-deserved retirement and recog4 nizes his dedication to helping others.

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<CIK>                         000764794
<NAME>                        WESTERN INTERNATIONAL PIZZA CORP.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. DOLLARS


<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              JUN-30-2001
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         0
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               0
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          3,585
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       397,500
<OTHER-SE>                                    (401,085)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   0
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               383
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (383)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (383)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                 (0.00)



</TABLE>
§ 52.29 Application for renewal. ( a ) Not less than 12, nor more than 36 months before the expiration date stated in the early site permit, or any later renewal period, the permit holder may apply for a renewal of the permit. An application for renewal must contain all information necessary to bring up to date the information and data contained in the previous application.
( b ) Any person whose interests may be affected by renewal of the permit may request a hearing on the application for renewal. The request for a hearing must comply with 10 CFR 2.309. If a hearing is granted, notice of the hearing will be published in accordance with 10 CFR 2.309.
( c ) An early site permit, either original or renewed, for which a timely application for renewal has been filed, remains in effect until the Commission has determined whether to renew the permit. If the permit is not renewed, it continues to be valid in certain proceedings in accordance with the provisions of § 52.26(b).
( d ) The Commission shall refer a copy of the application for renewal to the ACRS. The ACRS shall report on those portions of the application which concern safety and shall apply the criteria set forth in § 52.31.
[72 FR 49517, Aug. 28, 2007, as amended at 85 FR 65663, Oct. 16, 2020]
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

SONJA WHITLOW, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CASE NO. 3:06-CV-773-WKW

) [wo]

JUDGE JOHN DENSON, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

ORDER

On August 30, 2006, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation (Doc. # 4) that this case

is due to be dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiff timely filed an objection. After an independent

and de novo review of the record, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of the Court that:

1. The Recommendation (Doc. # 4) of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED;

2. The case is DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii).

An appropriate judgment will be entered.

DONE this the 21st day of September, 2006.

 /s/ W. Keith Watkins 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-00773-WKW-CSC Document 6 Filed 09/21/2006 Page 1 of 1
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsBOREAS TE-19 Ecosystem Carbon Balance ModelThe BOREAS TE-19 team developed a model called the Spruce and Moss Model (SPAM) designed to simulate the daily carbon balance of a black spruce/moss boreal forest ecosystem. It is driven by daily weather conditions, and consists of four components: (1) soil climate, (2) tree photosynthesis and respiration, (3) moss photosynthesis and respiration, and (4) litter decomposition and associated heterotrophic respiration. The model simulates tree gross and net photosynthesis, wood respiration, live root respiration, moss gross and net photosynthesis, and heterotrophic respiration (decomposition of root litter, young needle and moss litter, and humus). These values can be combined to generate predictions of total site net ecosystem exchange of carbon (NEE), total soil dark respiration (live roots + heterotrophs + live moss), spruce and moss net productivity, and net carbon accumulation in the soil. To date, simulations have been of the BOREAS NSA-OBS and SSA-OBS tower sites, from 1968-95 (except 1990-93). The files include source code and sample input and output files in ASCII format. The data files are available on a CD-ROM (see document number 20010000884), or from the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) Distributed Activity Archive Center (DAAC).Document ID20010004610Acquisition SourceGoddard Space Flight CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsHall, Forrest G.*(NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt, MD United States)*Papagno, Andrea*(Raytheon Information Technology and Scientific Services Greenbelt, MD United States)*Frolking, Steve*(New Hampshire Univ. Durham, NH United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 7, 2013Publication DateOctober 1, 2000Subject CategoryEarth Resources And Remote SensingReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.15:209891/VOL180NASA/TM-2000-209891/VOL180Rept-2000-03136-0/VOL180Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 462-33-01Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20010004610.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
Editorial Note on Part 26
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 26 appear at 87 FR 71455, Nov. 22, 2022.

§ 26.411 Protection of information. ( a ) Licensees and other entities who collect personal information about an individual for the purpose of complying with this subpart shall establish and maintain a system of files and procedures to protect the personal information. FFD programs must maintain and use such records with the highest regard for individual privacy.
( b ) Licensees and other entities shall obtain a signed consent that authorizes the disclosure of the personal information collected and maintained under this subpart before disclosing the personal information, except for disclosures to the individuals and entities specified in § 26.37(b)(1) through (b)(6), (b)(8), and persons deciding matters under review in § 26.413.
###### Editorial Note on Part 4

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 4 appear at 77 FR 39904, July 6, 2012.

#### § 4.93 Supervision and coordination.

The Commission may from time to time assign to officials of other departments or agencies of the Government, with the consent of the department or agency involved, responsibilities in connection with the effectuation of the purposes of title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and this subpart, other than responsibility for final decision as provided in § 4.72, including the achievement of effective coordination and maximum uniformity within the NRC and within the Executive Branch of the Government in the application of title VI of the Civil Rights Act and this subpart to similar programs and in similar situations. Any action taken, determination made, or requirement imposed by an official of another department or agency acting pursuant to an assignment of responsibility under this section shall have the same effect as though such action had been taken by the responsible NRC official.

[40 FR 8778, Mar. 3, 1975]
NotesFAQContact Us

Collection

Thesaurus
AdvancedSearch Tips

Collection

Thesaurus
BrowseThesaurus

 Download full text

**ERIC Number:**

**Record Type:**

**Publication Date:**

**Pages:**

**Abstractor:**

**ISBN:**

**ISSN:**

**EISSN:**

Cooperative LearningElementary Secondary EducationGroup ActivitiesGroup InstructionLanguage ArtsModelsStudent DevelopmentStudent NeedsTeamworkThinking Skills

**Publication Type:**

**Education Level:**

**Audience:**

**Language:**

**Sponsor:**

**Authoring Institution:**

**Grant or Contract Numbers:**

PrivacyCopyrightContact UsSelection PolicyAPI
JournalsNon-JournalsDownloadSubmitMultimediaWidget
#### The People of the State of New York Respondent, v. Mack Clark, Appellant.

Defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered December 12, 1966, which denied, after a hearing, his application for a writ of error *coram nobis ■*to vacate a judgment, rendered on May 19, 1966, convicting him, upon his plea of guilty, of assault in the second degree, and sentencing him thereon, as if the offense were a misdemeanor, to a term of 2% to 3 years in Sing Sing Prison. Order reversed, on the law and the facts; application granted and case remitted to the Criminal Term for repleading to the indictment and for further proceedings not inconsistent herewith. In our opinion, the record adequately established that the trial court, upon taking defendant’s plea of guilty, stated that it would treat the plea as a misdemeanor, if defendant were a first offender and would not send him to Sing Sing Prison. The sentence meted out to defendant of 2% to 3 years in State’s Prison did not conform *to*the then authorized *952punishments for misdemeanors, namely, imprisonment by definite sentence up to one year or confinement upon an indeterminate term not exceeding three years. Hence, the sentence imposed upon defendant was not the equivalent of the misdemeanor sentence promised by the court, although it was undisputed that defendant was a first offender. Christ, Brennan, Babin and Benjamin, JJ., concur; Beldoek, P. J., dissents and votes to affirm the order.
H. Res. 1105

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

December 8, 2006.

Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it 

shall be in order without intervention of any point of order 

to consider in the House the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 102) 

making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 

2007, and for other purposes. The joint resolution shall be 

considered as read. The previous question shall be considered 

as ordered on the joint resolution to final passage without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority 

member of the Committee on Appropriations; and (2) one 

motion to recommit. 

Attest:

Clerk.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>               6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                        SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                              4,373
<SECURITIES>                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                      13,723
<ALLOWANCES>                          402
<INVENTORY>                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                   18,678
<PP&E>                              8,747
<DEPRECIATION>                      5,968
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     22,135
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>               5,181
<BONDS>                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                             0
<COMMON>                               99
<OTHER-SE>                         16,991
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>       22,135
<SALES>                            23,504
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                   23,606
<CGS>                               5,156
<TOTAL-COSTS>                      19,144
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                     10
<INCOME-PRETAX>                     4,452
<INCOME-TAX>                        1,834
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                 2,618
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                        2,618
<EPS-PRIMARY>                        0.24 
<EPS-DILUTED>                        0.24
        

</TABLE>