IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

)

PLAINTIFF, )

)

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:06cv754-WC

)

TWO THOUSAND NINE HUNDRED )

THIRTY FIVE ($2,935) DOLLARS )

IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY, )

)

DEFENDANT. )

DECREE OF FORFEITURE

On August 23, 2006, a Verified Complaint for Forfeiture In Rem against the Defendant Two

Thousand Nine Hundred Thirty Five Dollars ($2,935.00) in United States currency was filed on

behalf of the United States of America (United States). The Complaint alleges that the Defendant

currency was used or intended to be used in exchange for controlled substances, or represents

proceeds of trafficking in controlled substances, or was used or intended to be used to facilitate the

commission of a violation of Title II of the Controlled Substances Act, 21 U.S.C. §§ 801 et seq.;

therefore, the Defendant currency is subject to forfeiture to the United States pursuant to 21 U.S.C.

§ 881(a)(6).

It appearing that process was fully issued in this action and returned according to law;

That pursuant to a Warrant and Summons for Arrest In Rem issued by this Court, the United

States Marshals Service for the Middle District of Alabama arrested the Defendant currency on

August 31, 2006;

That on September 14, 21, and 28, 2006, notice of the action was published in the

Case 2:06-cv-00754-WC Document 19 Filed 03/06/2007 Page 1 of 3
Montgomery Advertiser newspaper;

That on September 14, 2006, Linda Newkirk, secretary at the law office of Bowles and

Cottle, was personally served by the United States Marshals Service with a copy of the Verified

Complaint for Forfeiture In Rem and Warrant and Summons for Arrest In Rem;

That on September 18, 2006, Eddie Love filed an Answer and Verified Statement Identifying

Interest in Seized Property, within the time permitted by Rule G of the Supplemental Rules for

Admiralty or Maritime and Asset Forfeiture Claims;

That on March 5, 2007, the United States and Claimant Eddie Love entered into a Stipulation

for Compromise Settlement in which Claimant consented to entry of a Decree of Forfeiture forfeiting

One Thousand FourHundred Sixty Seven and 50/100 Dollars ($1,467.50), one half of the Defendant

currency, to the United States. The United States agreed to release the One Thousand Four Hundred

Sixty Seven and 50/100 Dollars ($1,467.50), the remaining one half of the Defendant currency, to

Claimant’s attorney, John I. Cottle, III;

That no other claim or answer has been filed on behalf of any other party.

Therefore, for good cause otherwise shown, it is

ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED:

That One Thousand Four Hundred Sixty Seven and 50/100 Dollars ($1,467.50) Dollars, one

half of the Defendant currency, is forfeited to the United States and no right, title or interest in the

Defendant currency shall exist in any other party and it shall be disposed of according to law;

That One Thousand Four Hundred Sixty Seven and 50/100 Dollars ($1,467.50), the

remaining one half of the Defendant currency, shall be released to Claimant’s attorney, John I.

Cottle, III; and, 

That each party will bear its own costs. 

Case 2:06-cv-00754-WC Document 19 Filed 03/06/2007 Page 2 of 3
DONE this the 6th day of March, 2007.

/s/ Wallace Capel, Jr.

WALLACE CAPEL, JR.

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00754-WC Document 19 Filed 03/06/2007 Page 3 of 3
A copy of this checklist is available at the website for the USCA, 11th Circuit at www.ca11.uscourts.gov

Effective on April 9, 2006, the new fee to file an appeal will increase from $255.00 to $455.00.

CIVIL APPEALS JURISDICTION CHECKLIST

1. Appealable Orders: Courts of Appeals have jurisdiction conferred and strictly limited by

statute:

(a) Appeals from final orders pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291: Only final orders and

judgments of district courts, or final orders of bankruptcy courts which have been

appealed to and fully resolved by a district court under 28 U.S.C.§ 158, generally are

appealable. A final decision is one that “ends the litigation on the merits and leaves

nothing for the court to do but execute the judgment.” Pitney Bowes, Inc. v. Mestre,

701 F.2d 1 365, 1 368 ( 11th Ci r. 1 983). A magistrate judge’s report and

recommendation is not final and appealable until judgment thereon is entered by a

district court judge. 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).

(b) In cases involving multiple parties or multiple claims, a judgment as to fewer than

all parties or all claims is not a final, appealable decision unless the district court has

certified the judgment for immediate review under Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b). Williams v.

Bishop, 732 F.2d 885, 885- 86 (11th Cir. 1984). A judg ment which resolves all

issues except matters, such as attorneys’ fees and costs, that are collateral to the

merits, is immediately appealable. Budinich v. Becton Dickinson & Co., 486

U.S.196, 201, 108 S.Ct. 1717, 1721-22, 100 L .Ed.2d 178 (1988); LaChance v.

Duffy’s Draft House, Inc., 146 F.3d 832, 837 (11th Cir. 1998).

(c) Appeals pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a): Appeals are permitted from orders

“granting, continuing, modifying, refusing or dissolving injunctions or refusing to

dissolve or modify injunctions . . .” and from “[i]nterlocutory decrees . . .

determining the rights and liabilities of parties to admiralty cases in which appeals

from final decrees are allowed.” Interlocutory appeals from orders denying temporary

restraining orders are not permitted.

(d) Appeals pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b) and Fed.R.App.P. 5: The certification

specified in 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b) must be obtained before a petition for permission to

appeal is filed in the Court of Appeals. The district court’s denial of a motion for

certification is not itself appealable.

(e) Appeals pursuant to judicially created exceptions to the finality rule: Limited

exceptions are discussed in cases including, but not limited to: Cohen v. Beneficial

Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 546, 69S.Ct. 1221, 1225-26, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949);

Atlantic Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass’n v. Blythe Eastman Paine Webber, Inc., 890 F.2d

371, 376 (11th Cir. 1989); Gillespie v. United States Steel Corp., 379 U.S. 148, 157,

85 S.Ct. 308, 312, 13 L.Ed.2d 199 (1964).

 Rev.: 4/04

Case 2:06-cv-00754-WC Document 19-2 Filed 03/06/2007 Page 1 of 2
2. Time for Filing: The timely filing of a notice of appeal is mandatory and jurisdictional.

Rinaldo v. Corbett, 256 F.3d 1276, 1278 (11th Cir. 2001). In civil cases, Fed.R.App.P. 4(a)

and (c) set the following time limits:

(a) Fed.R.App.P. 4(a)(1): A notice of appeal in compliance with the requirements set

forth in Fed.R.App.P. 3 must be filed in the district court within 30 days after the

entry of the order or judgment appealed from. However, if the United States or an

officer or agency thereof is a party, the notice of appeal must be filed in the district

court within 60 days after such entry. THE NOTICE MUST BE RECEIVED AND

FILED IN THE DISTRICT COURT NO LATER THAN THE LAST DAY OF

THE APPEAL PERIOD – no additional days are provided for mailing. Special

filing provisions for inmates are discussed below.

(b) Fed.R.App.P. 4(a)(3): “If one party timely files a notice of appeal, any other party

may file a notice of appeal within 14 days after the date when the first notice was

filed, or within the time otherwise prescribed by this Rule 4(a), whichever period

ends later.”

(c) Fed.R.App.P. 4(a)(4): If any party makes a timely motion in the district court under

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure of a type specified in this rule, the time for

appeal for all parties runs from the date of entry of the order disposing of the last

such timely filed motion.

(d) Fed.R.App.P. 4(a)(5) and 4(a)(6): Under certain limited circumstances, the district

court may extend the time to file a notice of appeal. Under Rule 4(a)(5), the time may

be extended if a motion for an extension is filed within 30 days after expiration of the

time otherwise provided to file a notice of appeal, upon a showing of excusable

neglect or good cause. Under Rule 4(a)(6), the time may be extended if the district

court finds upon motion that a party did not timely receive notice of the entry of the

judgment or order, and that no party would be prejudiced by an extension.

(e) Fed.R.App.P. 4(c): If an inmate confined to an institution files a notice of appeal in

either a civil case or a criminal case, the notice of appeal is timely if it is deposited in

the institution’s internal mail system on or before the last day for filing. Timely filing

may be shown by a declaration in compliance with 28 U.S.C. § 1746 or a notarized

statement, either of which must set forth the date of deposit and state that first-class

postage has been prepaid.

3. Format of the notice of appeal: Form 1, Appendix of Forms to the Federal Rules of

Appellate Procedure, is a suitable format. See also Fed.R.App.P. 3(c). A pro se notice of

appeal must be signed by the appellant.

4. Effect of a notice of appeal: A district court loses jurisdiction (authority) to act after the

filing of a timely notice of appeal, except for actions in aid of appellate jurisdiction or to rule

on a timely motion of the type specified in Fed.R.App.P. 4(a)(4).

Case 2:06-cv-00754-WC Document 19-2 Filed 03/06/2007 Page 2 of 2