### Name: Guy C. Packard

Title: Site Business Manager - JH Campbell Company: Consumers Energy Sign Date: 9/1/2010 Name: Randal J. Tysar Title: Senior Environmental Engineer Company: BT Environmental Consulting, Inc. Sign Date: 9/1/2010 Permitted Facility Representative / Date Testing Company Representative / Date 

## Consumers Energy Boilers 1&2 Test Plan

Final Test Report for

/ / Based on information and belief formed after reasonable inquiry, I certify that the statements and information in this test report are true, accurate, and complete. I have reviewed all testing details and results in this test report and hereby certify that the test report is authentic and accurate.

Thursday, February 24, 2011 Page 1 of 12

### Consumers Energy Boilers 1&2 Test Plan
9/1/2010 Facility Information: Consumers Energy J.H. Campbell Power St 17000 Croswell Street

West Olive MI49460 Contact:Ms. Katie Cunningham Phone: (517) 768-3462 Fax: 517-788-2329 Email: kmcunningham@cmsenergy.com Testing Company: BT Environmental Consulting, Inc. 2615 Wolcott Street

Ferndale MI48220 Contact:Todd Wessel Phone:(616) 885-4013 Fax: (248) 548-8073 Email: twessel@btecinc.com

Air Permit Number: MI-ROP-B2835-2005b Permitted Source ID/Name: EUBOILER1 and EUBOILER2 B2835 Permitted Maximum Process Rate: N/A Max. Normal Operation Process Rate: N/A Target Process Test Rate Approximately 600 MW for

Description of the source (including control equipment). Please see the attachments for source or process flow diagram: The source to be tested is the common exhaust from Boiler No. 1 and 2 located at the J.H. Campbell Power Station. Both boilers are equipped with electrostatic precipitator emissions control Industry/SCC/NAIS 221112

Sampling Location Information:

Test Parameter Information: AFS #: 2613900060 FRS #: 110000411108

SCC / Description10100211 External Combustion Boilers - Electric Generation - Bituminous/Subbituminous Coal - Wet Bottom (Tangential) (Bituminous Coal)

The following state and federal regulations that apply to the proposed testing:

Location Round

Duct Diam. Distance from upstream dist. Distance from

downstream dist. Number of

Traverse Ports Equiv. Diam Min.Travers Points Rect. Duct Length /Width Boilers 1&2 228 2016 2004 4 0 48 0 0

Target Parameter Test Method Number of

Test Runs Test Run

Duration Sample

Points Comments Location Flowrate Method 1 - 4 6 240 0 Boilers 1&2 % H2O Method 1 - 4 6 240 0 Boilers 1&2 Regulation Description Compound Limit Unit EUBOILER1 Total Particulate 0.16 lb/1000 lb exhaust gas corrected to 50% excess air EUBOILER2 Total Particulate 0.15 lb/1000 lb exhaust gas corrected to 50% excess air



### Thursday, February 24, 2011 Page 2 of 12

### Consumers Energy Boilers 1&2 Test Plan
9/1/2010

The following describes any modifications and/or deviations to the applicable test methods. If alternative methods were requested, see the attachments for documentation of request AND approval, including dates. Method 29 for Mercury instead of Method 30B. Use hexane in place of MeCl2 for solvent in OTM 28.

Organic Condensible Particulate OTM - 27/28 3 240 0 Approx 240 min. Vary due to constant sampling rate. Boilers 1&2

Inorganic (Aqueous)

Condensible Part. OTM - 27/28 3 240 0 Approx 240 min. Vary due to constant sampling rate. Boilers 1&2

Filterable PM2.5 OTM - 27/28 3 240 0 Approx 240 min. Vary due to constant sampling rate. Boilers 1&2

Total PM2.5 OTM - 27/28 3 240 0 Approx 240 min. Vary due to constant sampling rate. Boilers 1&2

Nickel Method 29 3 240 0 Boilers 1&2 Antimony Method 29 3 240 0 Boilers 1&2 Arsenic Method 29 3 240 0 Boilers 1&2 Beryllium Method 29 3 240 0 Boilers 1&2 Cobalt Method 29 3 240 0 Boilers 1&2 Chromium Method 29 3 240 0 Boilers 1&2 Lead Method 29 3 240 0 Boilers 1&2 Selenium Method 29 3 240 0 Boilers 1&2 Mercury Method 29 3 240 0 Boilers 1&2 Filterable Particulate Method 29 3 240 0 Boilers 1&2 Manganese Method 29 3 240 0 Boilers 1&2 Cadmium Method 29 3 240 0 Boilers 1&2 O2 Method 3A O2 3 240 0 Boilers 1&2 Co2 Method 3A CO2 3 240 0 Boilers 1&2



### Thursday, February 24, 2011 Page 3 of 12

### Consumers Energy Boilers 1&2 Test Plan
9/1/2010 Sampling / Stack Data Results Summary


### Location Boilers 1&2 - Method 29 Average Run Number M29-R1 M29-R2 M29-R3 Test Date 6/2/2010 6/3/2010 6/3/2010 Run Start Time 10:12:00 AM 7:57:00 AM 2:07:00 PM

Run Finish Time 3:56:00 PM1:10:00 PM 7:06:00 PM Net Run Time, minutes 240 240 240 Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 197.985 202.109 199.162 199.752 Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 10.15 9.73 9.53 9.803 Moisture Saturation at Stack Gas Temperature, % 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.000 Carbon Dioxide, % 12.26 12.65 13.02 12.643 Oxygen, % 7.22 6.97 6.63 6.940 Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 295.71 293.52 294.63 294.620 Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 1,313,164.1 1,341,341.7 1,322,211.2 1,325,572.33 3 Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 2,126,637.62,155,897.8 2,123,575.5 2,135,370.30 0 Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 100.8 100.7 100.7 100.733 F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 9780 9780 9780 9,780.000 Fw 10640 10640 10640 10,640.000 Fc 1800 1800 1800 1,800.000



### Thursday, February 24, 2011 Page 4 of 12

### Consumers Energy Boilers 1&2 Test Plan
9/1/2010
Location Boilers 1&2 - OTM - 27/28 Average Run Number Test Date Run Start Time Run Finish Time Net Run Time, minutes Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % Moisture Saturation at Stack Gas Temperature, % Carbon Dioxide, % Oxygen, % Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 Fw Fc



### Thursday, February 24, 2011 Page 5 of 12

### Consumers Energy Boilers 1&2 Test Plan
9/1/2010 Emissions Summary


### Location: Boilers 1&2 - Method 29 Compound: Antimony Average RunNumber M29-R1 M29-R2 M29-R3 Mass_mg 0.0048 0.0048 0.0048 0.005 Elb/hr 4.21E-03 4.21E-03 4.22E-03 0.004 lb/mmBtuO2 7.99E-07 7.68E-07 7.61E-07 0.000 

### Compound: Arsenic Average RunNumber M29-R1 M29-R2 M29-R3 Mass_mg 0.009 0.00939 0.00954 0.009 Elb/hr 7.90E-03 8.24E-03 8.38E-03 0.008 lb/mmBtuO2 1.50E-06 1.50E-06 1.51E-06 0.000 

### Compound: Beryllium Average RunNumber M29-R1 M29-R2 M29-R3 Mass_mg 0.00134 0.00139 0.00141 0.001 Elb/hr 1.18E-03 1.22E-03 1.24E-03 0.001 lb/mmBtuO2 2.23E-07 2.22E-07 2.24E-07 0.000 

### Compound: Cadmium Average RunNumber M29-R1 M29-R2 M29-R3 Mass_mg 0.00181 0.00149 0.00157 0.002 Elb/hr 1.59E-03 1.31E-03 1.38E-03 0.001 lb/mmBtuO2 3.01E-07 2.38E-07 2.49E-07 0.000 

### Compound: Chromium Average RunNumber M29-R1 M29-R2 M29-R3 Mass_mg 0.01148 0.01149 0.01053 0.011 Elb/hr 1.01E-02 1.01E-02 9.25E-03 0.010 lb/mmBtuO2 1.91E-06 1.84E-06 1.67E-06 0.000 

### Compound: Cobalt Average RunNumber M29-R1 M29-R2 M29-R3 Mass_mg 0.00363 0.00397 0.00429 0.004 Elb/hr 3.18E-03 3.49E-03 3.77E-03 0.003 lb/mmBtuO2 6.04E-07 6.35E-07 6.80E-07 0.000 

### Compound: Filterable Particulate Average RunNumber M29-R1 M29-R2 M29-R3 Mass_mg 67.3 65.9 72.5 68.567 Elb/hr 5.90E+01 5.79E+01 6.37E+01 60.200 lb/mmBtuO2 1.12E-02 1.05E-02 1.15E-02 0.011



### Thursday, February 24, 2011 Page 6 of 12

### Consumers Energy Boilers 1&2 Test Plan
9/1/2010 Compound: Lead Average RunNumber M29-R1 M29-R2 M29-R3 Mass_mg 0.0107 0.01228 0.01056 0.011 Elb/hr 9.39E-03 1.08E-02 9.27E-03 0.010 lb/mmBtuO2 1.78E-06 1.97E-06 1.67E-06 0.000 

### Compound: Manganese Average RunNumber M29-R1 M29-R2 M29-R3 Mass_mg 0.02565 0.02965 0.06685 0.041 Elb/hr 2.25E-02 2.60E-02 5.87E-02 0.036 lb/mmBtuO2 4.27E-06 4.75E-06 1.06E-05 0.000 

### Compound: Mercury Average RunNumber M29-R1 M29-R2 M29-R3 Mass_mg 0.004387 0.004251 0.0041219 0.004 Elb/hr 3.85E-03 3.73E-03 3.62E-03 0.004 lb/mmBtuO2 7.30E-07 6.80E-07 6.54E-07 0.000 

### Compound: Nickel Average RunNumber M29-R1 M29-R2 M29-R3 Mass_mg 0.02069 0.01639 0.01449 0.017 Elb/hr 1.82E-02 1.44E-02 1.27E-02 0.015 lb/mmBtuO2 3.44E-06 2.62E-06 2.30E-06 0.000 

### Compound: Selenium Average RunNumber M29-R1 M29-R2 M29-R3 Mass_mg 0.1348 0.1606 0.146 0.147 Elb/hr 1.18E-01 1.41E-01 1.28E-01 0.129 lb/mmBtuO2 2.24E-05 2.57E-05 2.31E-05 0.000



### Location: Boilers 1&2 - OTM - 27/28 

### Compound: Filterable PM2.5 Average RunNumber PM2.5 R1 PM2.5 R2 PM2.5 R3 Mass_mg 19.4 19.6 24.7 21.233 Elb/hr 3.98E+01 4.16E+01 5.13E+01 44.233 gr/dscf 3.49E-03 3.54E-03 4.45E-03 0.004 lb/mmBtuO2 7.45E-03 7.42E-03 9.10E-03 0.008 

### Compound: Inorganic (Aqueous) Condensible Pa Average RunNumber PM2.5 R1 PM2.5 R2 PM2.5 R3 Mass_mg 10.5 5 1.1 5.533 Elb/hr 2.15E+01 1.06E+01 2.29E+00 11.463 gr/dscf 1.89E-03 9.03E-04 1.98E-04 0.001 lb/mmBtuO2 4.03E-03 1.89E-03 4.05E-04 0.002



### Thursday, February 24, 2011 Page 7 of 12

### Consumers Energy Boilers 1&2 Test Plan
9/1/2010

Process Run Data Compound: Organic Condensible Particulate Average RunNumber PM2.5 R1 PM2.5 R2 PM2.5 R3 Mass_mg 2.6 2.4 2.2 2.400 Elb/hr 5.33E+00 5.09E+00 4.57E+00 4.997 gr/dscf 4.68E-04 4.34E-04 3.96E-04 0.000 lb/mmBtuO2 9.99E-04 9.09E-04 8.10E-04 0.001 

### Compound: Total PM2.5 Average RunNumber PM2.5 R1 PM2.5 R2 PM2.5 R3 Mass_mg 32.5 27 28 29.167 Elb/hr 6.66E+01 5.73E+01 5.82E+01 60.700 gr/dscf 5.85E-03 4.88E-03 5.04E-03 0.005 lb/mmBtuO2 1.25E-02 1.02E-02 1.03E-02 0.011



### Thursday, February 24, 2011 Page 8 of 12

### Consumers Energy Boilers 1&2 Test Plan
9/1/2010 Process Run Data

APCD Run Data

Process Lab Run Data 

### Run Name Value UOM Comments Target Value 1 Combined Boilers 1 and 2 Heat Input Rate 5466.5 mmbtu/hr 0


### 1 Boiler 1 Average Coal Feed Rate 149.9 tph 0
1 Boiler 2 Average Coal Feed Rate 143.6 tph 0
1 Boiler 1 Average Steam Output 1847.6 kpph 0


### 1 Boiler 2 Average Steam Output 2353.5 kpph 0
2 Combined Boilers 1 and 2 Heat Input Rate 5502.1 mmbtu/hr 0
2 Boiler 1 Average Coal Feed Rate 152 tph 0


### 2 Boiler 2 Average Coal Feed Rate 145.8 tph 0
2 Boiler 1 Average Steam Output 1834 kpph 0
2 Boiler 2 Average Steam Output 2373.8 kpph 0 

### 3 Combined Boilers 1 and 2 Heat Input Rate 5512 mmbtu/hr 0 3 Boiler 1 Average Coal Feed Rate 149.6 tph 0 3 Boiler 2 Average Coal Feed Rate 146.9 tph 0 

### 3 Boiler 1 Average Steam Output 1832 kpph 0 3 Boiler 2 Average Steam Output 2395 kpph 0



### Run Name Value UOM Comments 1 Boiler 1 Coal Higher Heating Value 12063 Btu/lb 

### 1 Boiler 1 Coal Moisture Content 28.16 % 1 Boiler 1 Coal Mercury Content 0.1 ppm 1 Boiler 1 Coal Arsenic Content 1 ppm 

### 1 Boiler 1 Coal Beryllium Content 0.3 ppm 1 Boiler 1 Coal Cadmium Content 0.2 ppm 1 Boiler 1 Coal Chromium Content 4 ppm 1 Boiler 1 Coal Lead Content 2 ppm 

### 1 Boiler 1 Coal Manganese Content 16 ppm 1 Boiler 1 Coal Nickel Content 5 ppm 1 Boiler 1 Coal Selenium Content 1 ppm 

### 2 Boiler 1 Coal Higher Heating Value 12040 Btu/lb 2 Boiler 1 Coal Moisture Content 29.06 % 2 Boiler 1 Coal Mercury Content 0.12 ppm 2 Boiler 1 Coal Arsenic Content 1 ppm


### Thursday, February 24, 2011 Page 9 of 12

### Consumers Energy Boilers 1&2 Test Plan
9/1/2010 2 Boiler 1 Coal Beryllium Content 0.3 ppm 

### 2 Boiler 1 Coal Cadmium Content 0.2 ppm 2 Boiler 1 Coal Chromium Content 5 ppm 2 Boiler 1 Coal Lead Content 2 ppm 2 Boiler 1 Coal Manganese Content 16 ppm 

### 2 Boiler 1 Coal Nickel Content 6 ppm 2 Boiler 1 Coal Selenium Content 1 ppm 2 Boiler 2 Coal Higher Heating Value 12848 Btu/lb 

### 2 Boiler 2 Coal Moisture Content 16.03 % 2 Boiler 2 Coal Mercury Content 0.08 ppm 2 Boiler 2 Coal Arsenic Content 4 ppm 2 Boiler 2 Coal Beryllium Content 1.6 ppm 

### 2 Boiler 2 Coal Cadmium Content 0.2 ppm 2 Boiler 2 Coal Chromium Content 14 ppm 2 Boiler 2 Coal Lead Content 6 ppm 

### 2 Boiler 2 Coal Manganese Content 13 ppm 2 Boiler 2 Coal Nickel Content 6 ppm 2 Boiler 2 Coal Selenium Content 4 ppm 3 Boiler 1 Coal Higher Heating Value 11998 Btu/lb 

### 3 Boiler 1 Coal Moisture Content 28.29 % 3 Boiler 1 Coal Mercury Content 0.1 ppm 3 Boiler 1 Coal Arsenic Content 1 ppm 

### 3 Boiler 1 Coal Beryllium Content 0.3 ppm 3 Boiler 1 Coal Cadmium Content 0.2 ppm 3 Boiler 1 Coal Chromium Content 5 ppm 3 Boiler 1 Coal Lead Content 2 ppm 

### 3 Boiler 1 Coal Manganese Content 16 ppm 3 Boiler 1 Coal Nickel Content 6 ppm 3 Boiler 1 Coal Selenium Content 1 ppm 

### 3 Boiler 2 Coal Higher Heating Value 12811 Btu/lb 3 Boiler 2 Coal Moisture Content 17.34 % 3 Boiler 2 Coal Mercury Content 0.08 ppm 3 Boiler 2 Coal Arsenic Content 3 ppm 

### 3 Boiler 2 Coal Beryllium Content 1.5 ppm 3 Boiler 2 Coal Cadmium Content 0.2 ppm 3 Boiler 2 Coal Chromium Content 13 ppm 

### 3 Boiler 2 Coal Lead Content 5 ppm 3 Boiler 2 Coal Manganese Content 16 ppm 3 Boiler 2 Coal Nickel Content 12 ppm 3 Boiler 2 Coal Selenium Content 4 ppm



### Thursday, February 24, 2011 Page 10 of 12

### Consumers Energy Boilers 1&2 Test Plan
9/1/2010 Sampling / Stack Data Results Detail


### Location Boilers 1&2 - Method 29 Average Run Number M29-R1 M29-R2 M29-R3 Test Date 6/2/2010 6/3/2010 6/3/2010 Run Start Time 10:12:00 AM 7:57:00 AM 2:07:00 PM Run Finish Time 3:56:00 PM 1:10:00 PM 7:06:00 PM Net Traversing Points 24 24 24 Net Run Time, minutes 240 240 240 Nozzle Diameter, inches 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.180 Pitot Tube Coefficient 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.840 Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor 1.012 1.012 1.012 1.012 Barometric Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.73 29.73 29.73 29.730 Average Orifice Meter Differential, inches H2O 2.07 2.11 2.05 2.077 Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, cubic feet 201.487 203.497 200.657 201.880 Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature, °F 83.10 77.38 77.64 79.373 Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf 197.985 202.109 199.162 199.752 Total Moisture Liquid collected, g 475 463 446 461.333 Volume of Water Vapor, standard cubic feet 22.36 21.79 20.99 21.713 Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % 10.15 9.73 9.53 9.803 Moisture Saturation at Stack Gas Temperature, % 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.000 Dry Mole Fraction 0.8985 0.9027 0.9047 0.902 Carbon Dioxide, % 12.26 12.65 13.02 12.643 Oxygen, % 7.22 6.97 6.63 6.940 Carbon Monoxide & Nitrogen, % 80.52 80.38 80.35 80.417 Fuel Factor 1.12 1.10 1.10 Dry Molecular Weight, lb/lb-Mole 30.25 30.30 30.35 30.300 Wet Molecular weight, lb/lb-Mole 29.01 29.10 29.17 29.093 Flue Gas Static Pressure, inches of H2O -4.1 -4.1 -4.1 -4.100 Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, inches of Mercury 29.43 29.43 29.43 29.430 Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F 295.71 293.52 294.63 294.620 Average Velocity Head, inches of H2O 3.4236752801 14193.539471157

23648 3.437722660

41924 3.467
Average Stack Gas Velocity, feet/second 125.01 126.73 124.83 125.523 Stack Cross-Sectional Area, square feet 283.529 283.529 283.529 283.529 Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm 1,313,164.1 1,341,341.7 1,322,211.21,325,572.3 33 Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm 2,126,637.6 2,155,897.8 2,123,575.52,135,370.3 00 Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % 100.8 100.7 100.7 100.733 Percent Excess Air, % 51.4 48.9 45.5 48.600 F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 9780 9780 9780 9,780.000 Round Duct Diameter, inches 228 228 228 Rectangular Duct Width, inches 0 0 0 Rectangular Duct Length, inches 0 0 0 Fw 10640 10640 1064010,640.000 Fc 1800 1800 1800 1,800.000



### Thursday, February 24, 2011 Page 11 of 12

### Consumers Energy Boilers 1&2 Test Plan
9/1/2010
Location Boilers 1&2 - OTM - 27/28 Average Run Number Test Date Run Start Time Run Finish Time Net Traversing Points Net Run Time, minutes Nozzle Diameter, inches Pitot Tube Coefficient Dry Gas Meter Calibration Factor Barometric Pressure, inches of Mercury Average Orifice Meter Differential, inches H2O Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, cubic feet Average Dry Gas Meter Temperature, °F Dry Gas Meter Volume Sampled, dscf Total Moisture Liquid collected, g Volume of Water Vapor, standard cubic feet Moisture Content of Stack Gas, % Moisture Saturation at Stack Gas Temperature, % Dry Mole Fraction Carbon Dioxide, % Oxygen, % Carbon Monoxide & Nitrogen, % Fuel Factor Dry Molecular Weight, lb/lb-Mole Wet Molecular weight, lb/lb-Mole Flue Gas Static Pressure, inches of H2O Absolute Flue Gas Pressure, inches of Mercury Average Stack Gas Temperature, °F Average Velocity Head, inches of H2O Average Stack Gas Velocity, feet/second Stack Cross-Sectional Area, square feet Dry Volumetric Flow Rate, dry scfm Actual Wet Volumetric Flue Gas Flow Rate, acfm Percent Isokinetic of Sampling Rate, % Percent Excess Air, % F-Factor, dscfm/MMBtu @ %O2 Round Duct Diameter, inches Rectangular Duct Width, inches Rectangular Duct Length, inches Fw Fc



### Thursday, February 24, 2011 Page 12 of 12