alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                                   0
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                            0
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     4,000
<PP&E>                                           2,558,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                     678,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,884,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,167,000
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                           696,000
<OTHER-SE>                                      (3,979,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1,884,000
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                         0
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      360,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 246,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (606,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (606,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (606,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        (0.01)



</TABLE>
________________________________________________________________________________ 

Don't put meat, dairy

products, or animal poop in

your compost. They will

make it smell bad—and 

Don’t miss Mulch

attract pests!! MULCH is a layer of nonliving materials. People can 

spread it on top of the soil around plants. Why use 

• 

• 

• • Compost 

fr

_____ _____t c_____ r _____s 

base of plant #1. 

I predict __________________________________________________________________ 

This is what happened: _________________________________________ 

_____________________________________ 

 Gardens 



Go on a Mulch Hunt! 

Place 

 At home 







. 

Tip 

A 

B 

D 

gr_____ss 

cl_____pp_____ngs 

d_____c_____y_____ng 

l_____ _____v _____s 

C f _____ _____d scr _____ps 

E v_____gg _____ _____ 

p _____ _____ls F 

G 

_____ggsh _____lls 

Compost ingredients: 

c _____ff _____ _____ 

gr _____ _____nds) 

United States Environmental Protection Agency 2003 

mulch? Mulch shades and cools the soil. It keeps 

moisture in the soil. Mulch protects the soil from 

packing down. Best of all, it stops pesty weeds from 

growing. Mulch can be: 

Wood chips • Dry leaves 

Grass clippings 

(with NO weeds or chemical weed killers) 

Rocks 

First, choose two plants growing in your garden, 

yard, schoolyard, or nearby park. Then... 

1. Put 1 inch of mulch around the 

2. Put 3 inches of mulch around plant #2. 

3. Check in one month. 

What I want to know now: 

How many places can you find mulch around plants? 

Schoolyard 

Kind of mulch Any Weeds? 

Yes No 

Neighbor’s yard 

Parks 

Boulevards 

How thick should a mulch 

layer be? See for yourself! 

for Grown-ups: 

Avoid “beaver lodge” mulching around trees. Spread the mulch evenly and 

leave a 3–4 inch air space around the base of your tree. 

Fill in the missing vowels. 

21
PGI 241.103 Statutory and delegated

authority.

Summary of Statutory Authority for Utility/Energy Purchases

Acquisition Type Authority Maximum Term

(years)

Energy Commodities (purchased as

supplies) (natural gas & electricity)

*

10 U.S.C. 3501/

10 U.S.C. 2829 5 (4) **

Utility Service Contracts (in

support of privatization) 10 U.S.C. 2688(d)(2) 50

Utility Service Contracts ***

(when not in support of

privatization)

10 U.S.C. 3201-3205

40 U.S.C. 113(e)(3) 10

* Section 8093 of Public Law 100-202 specifically precludes the Federal Government from

expending appropriated funds to purchase electricity in a manner inconsistent with State law

and regulation.

** 5 years in support of facilities and installations (10 U.S.C. 3501) and 4 years for military

family housing (10 U.S.C. 2829).

*** GSA has delegated to DoD its authority, under 40 U.S.C. 501(b), to enter into utility service

contracts for periods not exceeding 10 years. Absent this authority, the length of DoD utility

service contracts in support of facilities and installations would be limited to 5 years (10 U.S.C.

3531) and, for military family housing, would be limited to 4 years (10 U.S.C. 2829).

Parent topic: PGI 241.1 -GENERAL
EXHIBIT 31.1

Certification

I, Anderson Y. Lee, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this
report on Form 10-K of the American Express Issuance Trust II (the Exchange Act periodic reports);

2. Based on my
knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the
distribution, servicing or other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers
have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and

5. All of the reports on
assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be
included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of
noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above,
I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: The Bank of New York Mellon and TransCentra, Inc. (formerly known as Regulus Group LLC).

Date: March 20, 2014



|       |  |                                                            
|------ |  | -----------------------------------------------------------
|By:    |  | /s/ Anderson Y. Lee                                        
|Name:  |  | Anderson Y. Lee                                            
|Title: |  | Vice President and Treasurer                               
|       |  | American Express Receivables Financing
Corporation VIII LLC
|       |  | (senior officer in charge of securitization)
Case 3:06-cv-00777-MHT-TFM Document 6 Filed 09/11/2006 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-28-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-29-1998
<CASH>                                          18,479
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   64,063
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    386,796
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               497,064
<PP&E>                                         805,613
<DEPRECIATION>                                 337,996
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,024,200
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          369,358
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        19,474
<OTHER-SE>                                     588,806
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,024,200
<SALES>                                      2,347,879
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                        1,721,053
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,282,055
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 532
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 65,824
<INCOME-TAX>                                    25,800
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             40,024
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.03
        

</TABLE>
#### Robert Linden Wilhite, Appellant, v. Sarah Jane Wilhite, Appellee.

Gen. No. 40,742.

*276opinion filed June 26, 1940.

Walter Hamilton, for appellant; Albert Peterson, for appellee; Maurice M. Briggs, of counsel.

Opinion by

Justice Scanlan.

“Not to be published in full.”
#### Thomas P. Lilly, Appellant, v. Atlas Collapsible Tube Company, Appellee.

Gen. No. 41,100.

opinion filed October 1, 1940;

rehearing denied October 15, 1940.

George E. Fidler, for appellant; Adams, Emerson & Anderson, for appellee; Dudley R. Emerson, of coujisel.

Opinion by

Justice McSurely.

“Not to be published in full.’’
----

**Citizens        Financial Corp.**

**Certification        Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley **

**Act        of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350**

| 1. | the                  Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the company for the quarterly                  period                  ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange                  Commission on the date hereof (the “report”) fully complies with the                  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange                  Act of                  1934; and |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | the                  information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                  the                  company. |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  | 11/08/06                    |   | /s/                  Robert J. Schoonover |
|--------|----------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------|
|   |                             |   | Robert                  J. Schoonover     |
|   |                             |   | President                                 |
|   |                             |   | Chief                  Executive Officer  |

----
#### § 434.514 Lighting.

514.1 Interior Lighting Power Allowance (ILPA), for calculating the Energy Cost Budget shall be determined from subsection 401.3.2. The lighting power used to calculate the Design Energy Consumption shall be the actual adjusted power for lighting in the Proposed Design. If the lighting controls in the Proposed Design are more effective at saving energy than those required by subsection 401.3.1 and 401.3.2, the actual installed lighting power shall be used along with the schedules reflecting the action of the controls to calculate the Design Energy Consumption. This actual installed lighting power shall not be adjusted by the Power Adjustment Factors listed in Table 514.1.

| Automatic control device(s) | Standard PAF |
| --- | --- |
| (1) Occupancy Sensor | 0.30 |
| (2) Daylight Sensing Continuous Dimming | 0.30 |
| (3) Daylight Sensing Multiple Step Dimming | 0.20 |
| (4) Daylight Sensing On/Off | 0.10 |
| (5) Lumen Maintenance | 0.10 |

Table 514.1—Power Adjustment Factor (PAF)

514.2 Table 513.2.b establishes default assumptions for the percentage of the lighting load switched-on in each Prototype or Reference Building by hour of the day. These default assumptions can be changed when calculating the Energy Cost Budget to provide, for example, a 12-hour rather than an 8-hour workday.
#### § 605.16 Indirect cost limitations.

Awards issued under this part for conferences and scientific/technical meetings will not include payment for indirect costs.
#### Mary Thorne, Appellee, v. Chicago Orpheum Company, Sued Herein as the R. K. O. Palace Theatre, Appellant.

Gen. No. 40,773.

opinion filed June 26, 1940.

Ross *&*Berehem, for appellant; Levisohn & Levisohn, for appellee.

Opinion by

Justice Scanlan.

“Not to be published in full.”
#### The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v. Joseph Colozzo et al., Respondents.

Order of the Supreme 'Court, Kings County, dated September 26, 1967, affirmed as to all respondents except Balsamo, on the opinion of Mr. Justice Rinaldi at 'Criminal Term *(People*v. *Colozzo,*54 Misc 2d 687). As to respondent Balsamo, the appeal is dismissed; he has died. Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, Rabin, Hopkins and Munder, JJ., concur.
H. Res. 513

In the House of Representatives, U.S., 

October 26, 2005.

Resolved, That the following named Member be, and he 

is hereby, elected to the following standing committee of the 

House of Representatives: 

COMMITTEE ON ENERGY AND COMMERCE: Mr. Barrett 

of South Carolina.

Attest:

Clerk.
PGI 246.470-2 Quality evaluation data.       Types of quality evaluation data are—          (1)  Quality data developed by the contractor during performance;          (2)  Data developed by the Government through contract quality assurance actions; and          (3)  Reports by users and customers.    **Parent topic:** PGI 246.470 Government contract quality assurance actions.
IV 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 442 

Honoring the Fordham University School of Law upon the occasion of its 

100th Anniversary. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 14, 2005 

Mr. FOSSELLA submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Education and the Workforce 

RESOLUTION 

Honoring the Fordham University School of Law upon the 

occasion of its 100th Anniversary. 

Whereas it is the sense of the House of Representatives to 

recognize and commend those American universities 

which have achieved world renown and brought pride and 

honor to our Nation through their traditions of academic 

excellence; 

Whereas attendant to such concern, and in full accord with 

its long-standing traditions, the House of Representatives 

is justly proud to honor the Fordham University School 

of Law upon the occasion of its 100th Anniversary; 

Whereas on September 28, 1905, the Fordham University 

School of Law opened its door in the City of New York 

to 13 students; since that time it has evolved into one of 

the largest, most diverse and most respected law schools 
2 

•HRES 442 IH 

in the Nation, with nearly 1,600 students and over 200 

full-time and adjunct faculty; 

Whereas to commemorate this milestone in the life of the 

school and the educational history of the City and State 

of New York and the Nation, the Fordham University 

School of Law has designed a year-long celebration commencing on September 28, 2005; 

Whereas the Fordham University School of Law’s Centennial 

Celebration will feature symposia, lectures, galas and, in 

keeping with its dedication to serving others, a commitment by its alumni, faculty, and students to contribute 

100,000 hours of public pro bono work to help those that 

are less fortunate; 

Whereas for 100 years, the Fordham University School of 

Law has been defined by unparalleled standards of learning and has produced countless leaders throughout the 

world; and 

Whereas with great admiration, the House of Representatives 

is proud to pay tribute to this eminent university which 

stands at the threshold of the future with its legacy of 

outstanding achievements and its impressive body of distinguished alumni: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That— 

2 (1) the House of Representatives honors the 

3 Fordham University School of Law upon the occa4 sion of its 100th Anniversary, fully confident that in 

5 its future, it will enjoy the same success which has 

6 so characterized its past; and 
3 

•HRES 442 IH 

1 (2) a copy of this Resolution, suitably en2 grossed, be transmitted to the Fordham University 

3 School of Law. 

Æ
IV 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 464 

Supporting the goals and ideals of National Ovarian Cancer Awareness 

Month. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 27, 2005 

Mr. ISRAEL (for himself and Ms. DELAURO) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Government Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Supporting the goals and ideals of National Ovarian Cancer 

Awareness Month. 

Whereas ovarian cancer is the deadliest of all gynecological 

cancers, and the reported incidence of ovarian cancer is 

increasing over time; 

Whereas ovarian cancer is the fifth leading cause of cancer 

deaths among women in the United States; 

Whereas all women are at risk for ovarian cancer, and 90 

percent of women diagnosed with ovarian cancer do not 

have a family history that puts them at higher risk; 

Whereas the Pap smear is sensitive and specific to the early 

detection of cervical cancer, but not to ovarian cancer; 
2 

•HRES 464 IH 

Whereas there is currently no reliable and easy-to-administer 

screening test used for the early detection of ovarian cancer; 

Whereas many people are unaware that the symptoms of 

ovarian cancer can often include persistent abdominal 

pressure, bloating, abnormal bleeding, and unexplained 

weight loss or gain, among several other symptoms that 

are easily confused with other diseases; 

Whereas due to the lack of a reliable early screening test, 75 

percent of cases of ovarian cancer are detected at an advanced stage, when the five-year survival rate is only 50 

percent, a much lower rate than for many other cancers; 

Whereas if ovarian cancer is diagnosed and treated at an 

early stage before the cancer spreads outside of the 

ovary, the treatment is potentially less costly, and the 

survival rate is as high as 90 percent; 

Whereas there are factors that are known to reduce the risk 

for ovarian cancer and play an important role in the prevention of the disease; 

Whereas awareness and early recognition of ovarian cancer 

symptoms are currently the best way to save women’s 

lives; 

Whereas the Ovarian Cancer National Alliance, during the 

month of September, holds a number of events to increase public awareness of ovarian cancer; and 

Whereas a National Ovarian Cancer Awareness Month should 

be designated to increase the awareness of the public regarding the cancer: Now, therefore, be it 
3 

•HRES 464 IH 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives supports 

2 the goals and ideals of National Ovarian Cancer Aware3 ness Month. 

Æ
#### Jacobo Leiserson, Respondent, v. Mabro International, Inc., et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

Appeal from an order entered March 23, 1970 denying motion of defendants-appellants to vacate plaintiff’s notice of examination before trial is unanimously dismissed as moot, without costs and without disbursements, in view of our disposition of the companion appeal *(Leiserson*v. *Mabro Int.,*34 A D 2d 925). Should leave be granted to serve an amended complaint, and plaintiff, if so advised, applies for priority in respect of the examination before trial of the defendants, he shall be required to establish special circumstances. The affidavit of one of plaintiff’s attorneys avers: *“*Obviously, in this type of action there are many important facts which are not known to plaintiff but are solely within the knowledge of the defendants.” Said allegation by one without personal knowledge of the facts is vague, eonelusory and devoid of factual demonstration of the facts sought and plaintiff’s lack of knowledge thereof. Concur — McGivern, J. P., Markewich, McNally and Tilzer, JJ.
2007-1888.

#### State v. Roberts.

Cuyahoga App. No. 89453. On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied.

Pfeifer, J., dissents.
#### Paul Kaufman, Appellant, v Pollyann Kaufman, Respondent.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on March 19, 1980, unanimously modified, in the exercise of discretion, to reduce child support to $100 per week per child, and otherwise affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. We deem the amount awarded at Special Term to be excessive to the extent indicated. Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Ross, Markewich, Yesawich and Carro, JJ.
330.201-5 Waiver.

The Senior Procurement Executive (SPE) shall exercise the waiver authority under Federal

Acquisition Regulation 30.201-5(a)(2). Operating Divisions and Staff Divisions shall forward waiver

requests to the SPE.

Parent topic: Subpart 330.2 - CAS Program Requirements