From: Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US

To: John Schakenbach/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: Gabrielle Stevens/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Jeb Stenhouse/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 02/07/2012 12:39 PM

Subject: Emails in relation to EO 13563 12866 Interagency comments:CSAPR Amendment Final Rule

John -- below is the first of a set of emails from the inter-agency review process that must be included in 

the docket.

Let me know if this is not the way that I should do this -- I'll be sending at least one more chain.

Rick Haeuber, Ph.D.

USEPA (6204J)

Clean Air Markets Division

haeuber.richard@epa.gov

202-343-9250

http://www.twitter.com/EPAairmarkets

http://www.facebook.com/EPAairmarkets

----- Forwarded by Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US on 02/07/2012 12:34 PM -----

From: Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US

To: "Kymn, Christine J." <Christine_J._Kymn@omb.eop.gov>

Cc: Jeb Stenhouse/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 01/31/2012 05:48 PM

Subject: RE: Comments related to proposal-to-final changes in CSAPR revisions rule

Christine --- talking with here, 4 PM works best for us. So, the call-in number and passcode are:

866-299-3188

202-343-9250

Let me know if anything changes.

Look forward to talking with you

Rick Haeuber, Ph.D.

USEPA (6204J)

Clean Air Markets Division

haeuber.richard@epa.gov

202-343-9250

http://www.twitter.com/EPAairmarkets

http://www.facebook.com/EPAairmarkets

----- Forwarded by Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US on 02/07/2012 12:34 PM -----

From: Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US

To: "Kymn, Christine J." <Christine_J._Kymn@omb.eop.gov>

Cc: Jeb Stenhouse/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 02/01/2012 12:13 PM

Subject: RE: Comments related to proposal-to-final changes in CSAPR revisions rule

Christine --- I was able to get a good turnout here for a call tomorrow from 1:30-2:30. That seems about 

the only time when I can get a quorum, given the folks that need to participate on the call. We will use the 

same call-in coordinates as today, but can probably discuss this further on the call this afternoon.

Let me know if this time works on your end and if there are further developments. Feel free to call.
Thanks

Rick Haeuber, Ph.D.

USEPA (6204J)

Clean Air Markets Division

haeuber.richard@epa.gov

202-343-9250

http://www.twitter.com/EPAairmarkets

http://www.facebook.com/EPAairmarkets

----- Forwarded by Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US on 02/07/2012 12:34 PM -----

From: Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US

To: "Kymn, Christine J." <Christine_J._Kymn@omb.eop.gov>

Cc: Jeb Stenhouse/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 02/01/2012 03:09 PM

Subject: RE: Comments related to proposal-to-final changes in CSAPR revisions rule

Christine -- not sure about 1 PM tomorrow for the relevant folks. They will be on the call -- can we poll 

them at that point and adjust the schedule for tomorrow accordingly? 

Rick Haeuber, Ph.D.

USEPA (6204J)

Clean Air Markets Division

haeuber.richard@epa.gov

202-343-9250

http://www.twitter.com/EPAairmarkets

http://www.facebook.com/EPAairmarkets

----- Forwarded by Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US on 02/07/2012 12:34 PM -----

From: Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US

To: "Kymn, Christine J." <Christine_J._Kymn@omb.eop.gov>

Cc: Jeb Stenhouse/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 02/01/2012 03:18 PM

Subject: Re: EO 13563 12866 Interagency Comments 2 CSAPR Amendment rules

Christine -- I'm a little confused --- are these different than what you sent before? Or. is it just the issue of 

you having to send it twice because our email was not cooperating?

Rick Haeuber, Ph.D.

USEPA (6204J)

Clean Air Markets Division

haeuber.richard@epa.gov

202-343-9250

http://www.twitter.com/EPAairmarkets

http://www.facebook.com/EPAairmarkets

From: "Kymn, Christine J." <Christine_J._Kymn@omb.eop.gov>

To: Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Jeb Stenhouse/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 02/01/2012 03:13 PM

Subject: EO 13563 12866 Interagency Comments 2 CSAPR Amendment rules
Rick and Jeb,

Attached please find interagency comments for the 2 CSAPR rules. 

Speak with you soon,

Christine [attachment "EO1356312866Interagencycomments1_CSAPR_RevisionsI_2060-AR22.doc" 

deleted by Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US] [attachment 

"EO1356312866Interagencycomments2_CSAPR_Revisions_Part_II_2060-AR35.doc" deleted by Richard 

Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US] [attachment "EO1356312866Interagencycomments3 Final Revisions Rule 

Significant Contribution Assessment TSD.doc" deleted by Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US] 

----- Forwarded by Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US on 02/07/2012 12:34 PM -----

From: Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US

To: "Kymn, Christine J." <Christine_J._Kymn@omb.eop.gov>

Cc: Jeb Stenhouse/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 02/01/2012 05:49 PM

Subject: RE: Comments related to proposal-to-final changes in CSAPR revisions rule

Christine --- How about 11-12 tomorrow? I've sent a scheduler to folks here, though I believe I have a 

conflict and Jeb will lead for us.

Same call-in numbers

866-299-3188

202-343-9250

Rick Haeuber, Ph.D.

USEPA (6204J)

Clean Air Markets Division

haeuber.richard@epa.gov

202-343-9250

http://www.twitter.com/EPAairmarkets

http://www.facebook.com/EPAairmarkets

----- Forwarded by Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US on 02/07/2012 12:34 PM -----

From: Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US

To: "Kymn, Christine J." <Christine_J._Kymn@omb.eop.gov>

Cc: Jeb Stenhouse/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 02/01/2012 06:27 PM

Subject: RE: Comments related to proposal-to-final changes in CSAPR revisions rule

Thanks for checking on timing for tomorrow -- hopefully it can work as that may be the only time that OGC 

can make it

Rick Haeuber, Ph.D.

USEPA (6204J)

Clean Air Markets Division

haeuber.richard@epa.gov

202-343-9250

http://www.twitter.com/EPAairmarkets

http://www.facebook.com/EPAairmarkets
From: "Kymn, Christine J." <Christine_J._Kymn@omb.eop.gov>

To: Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: Jeb Stenhouse/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 02/01/2012 06:21 PM

Subject: RE: Comments related to proposal-to-final changes in CSAPR revisions rule

I've put a feeler out and will let EPA know as soon as I hear. I'm not sure 

that Jeb needs to be on the line, so long as someone from OGC is on. Feel 

bad enough about obliging him to today's call!

Thanks,

Christine

-----Original Message-----

From: Richard Haeuber [mailto:Haeuber.Richard@epamail.epa.gov] 

Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2012 5:50 PM

To: Kymn, Christine J.

Cc: Jeb Stenhouse

Subject: RE: Comments related to proposal-to-final changes in CSAPR revisions 

rule

Christine --- How about 11-12 tomorrow? I've sent a scheduler to folks here, 

though I believe I have a conflict and Jeb will lead for us.

Same call-in numbers

866-299-3188

202-343-9250

Rick Haeuber, Ph.D.

USEPA (6204J)

Clean Air Markets Division

haeuber.richard@epa.gov

202-343-9250

http://www.twitter.com/EPAairmarkets

http://www.facebook.com/EPAairmarkets

----- Forwarded by Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US on 02/07/2012 12:34 PM -----

From: Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US

To: "Kymn, Christine J." <Christine_J._Kymn@omb.eop.gov>

Cc: Jeb Stenhouse/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 02/02/2012 09:08 AM

Subject: RE: Comments related to proposal-to-final changes in CSAPR revisions rule

Good morning --- any word on whether 11 AM will work?

Rick Haeuber, Ph.D.

USEPA (6204J)

Clean Air Markets Division

haeuber.richard@epa.gov

202-343-9250
http://www.twitter.com/EPAairmarkets

http://www.facebook.com/EPAairmarkets

From: "Kymn, Christine J." <Christine_J._Kymn@omb.eop.gov>

To: Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: Jeb Stenhouse/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 02/01/2012 06:21 PM

Subject: RE: Comments related to proposal-to-final changes in CSAPR revisions rule

I've put a feeler out and will let EPA know as soon as I hear. I'm not sure 

that Jeb needs to be on the line, so long as someone from OGC is on. Feel 

bad enough about obliging him to today's call!

Thanks,

Christine

-----Original Message-----

From: Richard Haeuber [mailto:Haeuber.Richard@epamail.epa.gov] 

Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2012 5:50 PM

To: Kymn, Christine J.

Cc: Jeb Stenhouse

Subject: RE: Comments related to proposal-to-final changes in CSAPR revisions 

rule

Christine --- How about 11-12 tomorrow? I've sent a scheduler to folks here, 

though I believe I have a conflict and Jeb will lead for us.

Same call-in numbers

866-299-3188

202-343-9250

Rick Haeuber, Ph.D.

USEPA (6204J)

Clean Air Markets Division

haeuber.richard@epa.gov

202-343-9250

http://www.twitter.com/EPAairmarkets

http://www.facebook.com/EPAairmarkets

----- Forwarded by Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US on 02/07/2012 12:34 PM -----

From: Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US

To: "Kymn, Christine J." <Christine_J._Kymn@omb.eop.gov>

Cc: Jeb Stenhouse/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 02/02/2012 09:26 AM

Subject: Re: Comments related to proposal-to-final changes in CSAPR revisions rule

we can use the same call-in

866-299-3188

202-343-9250
thanks

Rick Haeuber, Ph.D.

USEPA (6204J)

Clean Air Markets Division

haeuber.richard@epa.gov

202-343-9250

http://www.twitter.com/EPAairmarkets

http://www.facebook.com/EPAairmarkets

----- Forwarded by Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US on 02/07/2012 12:34 PM -----

From: Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US

To: "Kymn, Christine J." <Christine_J._Kymn@omb.eop.gov>

Cc: Jeb Stenhouse/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 02/02/2012 04:31 PM

Subject: Re: Comments related to proposal-to-final changes in CSAPR revisions rule

I'm here if you want to call after your 5 PM to touch base. Not sure a another group call is possible or 

helpful today.

Rick Haeuber, Ph.D.

USEPA (6204J)

Clean Air Markets Division

haeuber.richard@epa.gov

202-343-9250

http://www.twitter.com/EPAairmarkets

http://www.facebook.com/EPAairmarkets

----- Forwarded by Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US on 02/07/2012 12:34 PM -----

From: Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US

To: "Kymn, Christine J." <Christine_J._Kymn@omb.eop.gov>

Date: 02/02/2012 05:11 PM

Subject: Re: Comments related to proposal-to-final changes in CSAPR revisions rule

I've got a call at 5:15, but can hold off until 5:20-ish

Rick Haeuber, Ph.D.

USEPA (6204J)

Clean Air Markets Division

haeuber.richard@epa.gov

202-343-9250

http://www.twitter.com/EPAairmarkets

http://www.facebook.com/EPAairmarkets

----- Forwarded by Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US on 02/07/2012 12:34 PM -----

From: Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US

To: "Kymn, Christine J." <Christine_J._Kymn@omb.eop.gov>

Cc: Jeb Stenhouse/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 02/02/2012 05:31 PM

Subject: RE: Comments related to proposal-to-final changes in CSAPR revisions rule

Christine,
Please find attached the redline versions of the documents for the CSAPR revisions rule package. The 

attachments address all of the comments that you sent as attachments in your email of 2/1/12, as well as 

the additional minor editorial revisions we discussed on the call this morning.

We realize that there is one issue that remains to be worked out, but I wanted you to have the attached 

so that we could keep the process moving as quickly and efficiently as possible.

Thanks

EO12866_CSAPR Revisions Part II 2060-

AR35 DFRM 2-2-2012.doc 

EO12866_CSAPR Revisions 2060-AR22 FRM Preamble and Reg Text_2-2-2012.doc 

Final Revisions Rule Significant Contribution 

Assessment TSD.doc 

Rick Haeuber, Ph.D.

USEPA (6204J)

Clean Air Markets Division

haeuber.richard@epa.gov

202-343-9250

http://www.twitter.com/EPAairmarkets

http://www.facebook.com/EPAairmarkets

----- Forwarded by Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US on 02/07/2012 12:34 PM -----

From: Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US

To: "Kymn, Christine J." <Christine_J._Kymn@omb.eop.gov>

Cc: Jeb Stenhouse/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 02/03/2012 11:50 AM

Subject: Re: Comments related to proposal-to-final changes in CSAPR revisions rule

Christine -- as we discussed, this got lost in the shuffle of the other conversation. Sorry about that. 

Attached are the comments you requested.

EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0491-4784-A1.pdf 

EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0491-4782-A1.pdf 

EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0491-4752-A1.pdf 

EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0491-4752-A4.pdf 

EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0491-4752-A2.pdf 

EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0491-4752-A3.pdf 

EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0491-4818-A3.pdf 

EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0491-4818-A1.pdf 
EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0491-4818-A2.pdf 

EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0491-4800-A1.pdf 

EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0491-4755-A1.pdf 

EPA-HQ-OAR-2009-0491-4822-A1.pdf 

Rick Haeuber, Ph.D.

USEPA (6204J)

Clean Air Markets Division

haeuber.richard@epa.gov

202-343-9250

http://www.twitter.com/EPAairmarkets

http://www.facebook.com/EPAairmarkets

----- Forwarded by Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US on 02/07/2012 12:34 PM -----

From: Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US

To: "Kymn, Christine J." <Christine_J._Kymn@omb.eop.gov>

Date: 02/03/2012 01:37 PM

Subject: RE: EO 13563 12866 Interagency comments:CSAPR Amendment Final Rule

already sent them....I'll call off the troops

Rick Haeuber, Ph.D.

USEPA (6204J)

Clean Air Markets Division

haeuber.richard@epa.gov

202-343-9250

http://www.twitter.com/EPAairmarkets

http://www.facebook.com/EPAairmarkets

----- Forwarded by Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US on 02/07/2012 12:34 PM -----

From: Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US

To: "Kymn, Christine J." <Christine_J._Kymn@omb.eop.gov>

Cc: Jeb Stenhouse/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 02/03/2012 02:02 PM

Subject: RE: EO 13563 12866 Interagency comments:CSAPR Amendment Final Rule

that's what we figured -- and, yes, folks noticed quickly, resulting in several quizzical emails

so, does this mean there were no additional comments? Or, should I still anticipate an email from you?

Rick Haeuber, Ph.D.

USEPA (6204J)

Clean Air Markets Division

haeuber.richard@epa.gov

202-343-9250

http://www.twitter.com/EPAairmarkets

http://www.facebook.com/EPAairmarkets
From: "Kymn, Christine J." <Christine_J._Kymn@omb.eop.gov>

To: Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 02/03/2012 01:44 PM

Subject: RE: EO 13563 12866 Interagency comments:CSAPR Amendment Final Rule

Many apologies. They'll notice as soon as they open the file. Lotta balls 

in the air today. 

-----Original Message-----

From: Richard Haeuber [mailto:Haeuber.Richard@epamail.epa.gov] 

Sent: Friday, February 03, 2012 1:37 PM

To: Kymn, Christine J.

Subject: RE: EO 13563 12866 Interagency comments:CSAPR Amendment Final Rule

already sent them....I'll call off the troops

Rick Haeuber, Ph.D.

USEPA (6204J)

Clean Air Markets Division

haeuber.richard@epa.gov

202-343-9250

http://www.twitter.com/EPAairmarkets

http://www.facebook.com/EPAairmarkets

----- Forwarded by Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US on 02/07/2012 12:34 PM -----

From: Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US

To: "Kymn, Christine J." <Christine_J._Kymn@omb.eop.gov>

Cc: Jeb Stenhouse/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 02/03/2012 02:43 PM

Subject: Re: EO 13563 12866 Interagency comments:CSAPR Amendment Final Rule

Christine --- thanks for the clarification about the comments you sent inadvertently. I've attached a onepager that provides some helpful detail on the changes to the budget for one state. I'll send another email 

in a little bit that provides some information on some of the assumptions we discussed recently.

Hope this helps

CSAPR Rev Rule TX SO2 Changes.docx 

Rick Haeuber, Ph.D.

USEPA (6204J)

Clean Air Markets Division

haeuber.richard@epa.gov

202-343-9250

http://www.twitter.com/EPAairmarkets

http://www.facebook.com/EPAairmarkets

----- Forwarded by Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US on 02/07/2012 12:34 PM -----

From: Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US

To: "Kymn, Christine J." <Christine_J._Kymn@omb.eop.gov>
Cc: Jeb Stenhouse/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 02/03/2012 03:23 PM

Subject: RE: EO 13563 12866 Interagency comments:CSAPR Amendment Final Rule

Christine,

As promised, here is some additional information that, I hope, provides helpful detail in regard to our 

recent discussion on technology.

-- We based our scrubber assumptions in the final CSAPR rule on EIA form 860 which provides 

information on the capability (i.e., "design" parameters under normal operating conditions) of scrubbers, 

as opposed to actual historical performance data. At that time, we assumed that 100% of flue gas was 

treated at all scrubbers. 

-- We responded to comments in the final rule and defended at that time that we should, as we did, use 

capability rather than actual performance data.

-- In the proposed revisions rule, when we tried to address the concern raised by facilities in Texas that 

due to stack configurations 100% of the flue gas was not being treated by the scrubber, we deviated from 

the approach taken in the final CSAPR when we based the proposed revisions for flue gas bypass on one 

historical year's performance from the 2008 EIA form 923 for the units in Texas.

-- We received comments from EDF, Sierra Club and NRDC pointing out the inconsistency with the 

approach used in the final CSAPR rule and suggesting we use scrubber capability information on flue gas 

bypass that is included on EIA form 860, consistent with what we did in the final rule, for the adjustment 

for those units. 

-- In this final revisions rule, we acknowledge the mistake in using the performance data from from the 

2008 EIA form 923 for Texas in the revisions proposal, as opposed to scrubber capability from EIA form 

860, and the correction of that mistake, which we made by taking into account scrubber capability data 

from EIA form 860 in this final notice.

-- Consistent with this final approach for the units in Texas and with the final CSAPR rule, we have also 

applied this approach in the direct final in responding to a comment we received in the CSAPR revisions 

proposal to address flue gas bypass for units in Indiana.

Rick Haeuber, Ph.D.

USEPA (6204J)

Clean Air Markets Division

haeuber.richard@epa.gov

202-343-9250

http://www.twitter.com/EPAairmarkets

http://www.facebook.com/EPAairmarkets

----- Forwarded by Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US on 02/07/2012 12:34 PM -----

From: Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US

To: "Kymn, Christine J." <Christine_J._Kymn@omb.eop.gov>

Cc: Jeb Stenhouse/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 02/06/2012 07:45 AM

Subject: RE: EO 13563 12866 Interagency comments:CSAPR Amendment Final Rule

Good morning Christine -- just checking in to see if we've made any progress. I'll be in the office shortly 

and look forward to hearing from you.

Thanks

Rick Haeuber, Ph.D.

USEPA (6204J)

Clean Air Markets Division
haeuber.richard@epa.gov

202-343-9250

http://www.twitter.com/EPAairmarkets

http://www.facebook.com/EPAairmarkets

-----"Kymn, Christine J." <Christine_J._Kymn@omb.eop.gov> wrote: -----

To: Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

From: "Kymn, Christine J." <Christine_J._Kymn@omb.eop.gov>

Date: 02/03/2012 04:01PM

Cc: Jeb Stenhouse/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Subject: RE: EO 13563 12866 Interagency comments:CSAPR Amendment Final Rule

Thanks, Rick. I will forward this info as well. 

-----Original Message-----

From: Richard Haeuber [mailto:Haeuber.Richard@epamail.epa.gov] 

Sent: Friday, February 03, 2012 3:23 PM

To: Kymn, Christine J.

Cc: Jeb Stenhouse

Subject: RE: EO 13563 12866 Interagency comments:CSAPR Amendment 

Final Rule

Christine,

As promised, here is some additional information that, I hope, 

provides helpful detail in regard to our recent discussion on 

technology.

-- We based our scrubber assumptions in the final CSAPR rule on 

EIA form

860 which provides information on the capability (i.e., "design"

parameters under normal operating conditions) of scrubbers, as 

opposed to actual historical performance data. At that time, we 

assumed that 100% of flue gas was treated at all scrubbers.

-- We responded to comments in the final rule and defended at 

that time that we should, as we did, use capability rather than 

actual performance data.

-- In the proposed revisions rule, when we tried to address the 

concern raised by facilities in Texas that due to stack 

configurations 100% of the flue gas was not being treated by the 

scrubber, we deviated from the approach taken in the final CSAPR 

when we based the proposed revisions for flue gas bypass on one 

historical year's performance from the 2008 EIA form 923 for the 

units in Texas.

-- We received comments from EDF, Sierra Club and NRDC pointing 

out the inconsistency with the approach used in the final CSAPR 

rule and suggesting we use scrubber capability information on 

flue gas bypass that is included on EIA form 860, consistent 

with what we did in the final rule, for the adjustment for those 
units.

-- In this final revisions rule, we acknowledge the mistake in 

using the performance data from from the 2008 EIA form 923 for 

Texas in the revisions proposal, as opposed to scrubber 

capability from EIA form 860, and the correction of that 

mistake, which we made by taking into account scrubber 

capability data from EIA form 860 in this final notice.

-- Consistent with this final approach for the units in Texas 

and with the final CSAPR rule, we have also applied this 

approach in the direct final in responding to a comment we 

received in the CSAPR revisions proposal to address flue gas 

bypass for units in Indiana.

Rick Haeuber, Ph.D.

USEPA (6204J)

Clean Air Markets Division

haeuber.richard@epa.gov

202-343-9250

http://www.twitter.com/EPAairmarkets

http://www.facebook.com/EPAairmarkets

----- Forwarded by Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US on 02/07/2012 12:34 PM -----

From: Richard Haeuber/DC/USEPA/US

To: "Kymn, Christine J." <Christine_J._Kymn@omb.eop.gov>

Cc: Jeb Stenhouse/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 02/06/2012 03:42 PM

Subject: Re: EO 13563 12866 Interagency comments:CSAPR Amendment Final Rule

No, as far as I know folks are just checking on general status.

Rick Haeuber, Ph.D.

USEPA (6204J)

Clean Air Markets Division

haeuber.richard@epa.gov

202-343-9250

http://www.twitter.com/EPAairmarkets

http://www.facebook.com/EPAairmarkets