alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Dennis Vadura, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of AccuPoll Holding Corp.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer(s)  and I are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures,  or caused such disclosure
controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to ensure that
material  information  relating to the  registrant,  including its  consolidated
subsidiaries is made known to us by others within those  entities,  particularly
during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

(b) evaluated the  effectiveness  of the  registrant's  disclosure  controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions  about the effectiveness
of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)  disclosed in this report any change in the  registrant's  internal  control
over  financial  reporting  that occurred  during the  registrant's  most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's  fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has  materially  affected,  or is  reasonably  likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying  officer(s) and I have disclosed,  based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,  to the
registrant's  auditors  and the audit  committee  of the  registrant's  board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions);

(a) all  significant  deficiencies  and  material  weaknesses  in the  design or
operation of internal  control over  financial  reporting  which are  reasonably
likely  to  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability  to  record,  process,
summarize and report financial information; and

(b) any fraud,  whether  or not  material,  that  involves  management  or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's  internal control over
financial reporting.

May 16, 2005                                /s/ Dennis Vadura
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Dennis Vadura
                                            Chief Executive Officer
#### § 436.12 Life cycle cost methodology.

The life cycle cost methodology for this part is a systematic analysis of relevant costs, excluding sunk costs, over a study period, relating initial costs to future costs by the technique of discounting future costs to present values.
Editorial Note on Part 70
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 70 appear at 81 FR 86910, Dec. 2, 2016.

§ 70.65 Additional content of applications. ( a ) In addition to the contents required by § 70.22, each application must include a description of the applicant's safety program established under § 70.62.
( b ) The integrated safety analysis summary must be submitted with the license or renewal application (and amendment application as necessary), but shall not be incorporated in the license. However, changes to the integrated safety analysis summary shall meet the conditions of § 70.72. The integrated safety analysis summary must contain: ( 1 ) A general description of the site with emphasis on those factors that could affect safety (*i.e.,* meteorology, seismology);
( 2 ) A general description of the facility with emphasis on those areas that could affect safety, including an identification of the controlled area boundaries;
( 3 ) A description of each process (defined as a single reasonably simple integrated unit operation within an overall production line) analyzed in the integrated safety analysis in sufficient detail to understand the theory of operation; and, for each process, the hazards that were identified in the integrated safety analysis pursuant to § 70.62(c)(1)(i)-(iii) and a general description of the types of accident sequences;
( 4 ) Information that demonstrates the licensee's compliance with the performance requirements of § 70.61, including a description of the management measures; the requirements for criticality monitoring and alarms in § 70.24; and, if applicable, the requirements of § 70.64;
( 5 ) A description of the team, qualifications, and the methods used to perform the integrated safety analysis;
( 6 ) A list briefly describing each item relied on for safety which is identified pursuant to § 70.61(e) in sufficient detail to understand their functions in relation to the performance requirements of § 70.61;
( 7 ) A description of the proposed quantitative standards used to assess the consequences to an individual from acute chemical exposure to licensed material or chemicals produced from licensed materials which are on-site, or expected to be on-site as described in § 70.61(b)(4) and (c)(4);
( 8 ) A descriptive list that identifies all items relied on for safety that are the sole item preventing or mitigating an accident sequence that exceeds the performance requirements of § 70.61; and
( 9 ) A description of the definitions of unlikely, highly unlikely, and credible as used in the evaluations in the integrated safety analysis.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 431 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 431

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that there should 
                be established a Lifelong Learning Week.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 7, 2005

 Mr. Sweeney submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                   the Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that there should 
                be established a Lifelong Learning Week.

Whereas the first week in September after Labor Day marks the beginning of the 
        Lifelong Learning Semester;
Whereas participation in lifelong learning programs has increased tremendously 
        since 1962;
Whereas there are over 300 Institutes for Learning in Retirement affiliated with 
        colleges and universities across the country with over 100,000 members;
Whereas the international network or partnership of lifelong learning programs 
        and organizations consists of 1,900 colleges, universities, conference 
        centers, museums, and many other educational programs on a vast array of 
        subjects;
Whereas lifelong learning programs encourage volunteer participation by members, 
        which helps develop a real sense of community among other learners;
Whereas lifelong learning institutes have created community-building programs 
        such as 52 Activities to Share with Your Grandchild as part of the Adopt 
        a Grandchild program;
Whereas as over 76 million Baby Boomers prepare to reinvent retirement, the 
        demand for education and volunteer opportunities in the community will 
        increase greatly;
Whereas lifelong learning programs provide stimulating educational opportunities 
        for seniors and their peers in the community; and
Whereas the establishment of the first full week in September as Lifelong 
        Learning Week would recognize seniors, their teachers, and the 
        institutions and programs involved with lifelong learning: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved,  That it is the sense of the House of Representatives 
that there should be established a Lifelong Learning Week.
                                 <all>
```
Independent Director Compensation Summary Sheet



 Exhibit 10.16 
  
 Sunoco Partners LLC 
 Independent Director Compensation Summary Sheet 
 for 2010 

 
 Directors who are employees of Sunoco Partners LLC or its
affiliates receive no additional compensation for service on the general partner’s board of directors or any committees of the board. The table below summarizes the 2010 compensation program for independent directors of Sunoco Partners LLC.

  
 2010 INDEPENDENT DIRECTOR COMPENSATION SUMMARY

  

							
	 Component
	  	Amount
($)	  	Medium of Payment (1)	  	Timing of Payment (2)
				
	 Annual Retainer
	  	41,000 per year	  	Restricted Units	  	$10,250 credited quarterly
				
		  	41,000 per year	  	Cash	  	$10,250 paid quarterly
				
	 Board Meeting Fee
	  	1,500 per meeting	  	Cash	  	Paid quarterly
				
	 Committee Meeting Fee
	  	1,000 per meeting	  	Cash	  	Paid quarterly
				
	 Compensation Committee Chair Retainer
	  	3,500 per year	  	Cash	  	$ 875 paid quarterly
				
	 Audit/Conflicts Committee Chair Retainer
	  	8,000 per year	  	Cash	  	$2,000 paid quarterly

  
 Notes to table: 
  

	(1)	Pursuant to the Sunoco Partners LLC Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan, the portion of the annual retainer paid in the form of Restricted Units is required to
be deferred, and is credited to each independent director’s Mandatory Deferred Compensation Account. In addition, independent directors are permitted to voluntarily defer all or a portion of their cash retainers and fees. Voluntarily deferred
cash compensation amounts are credited in the form of Restricted Units to each independent director’s Voluntary Deferred Compensation Account. 

  

	(2)	The fair market value of each quarterly payment of Restricted Units is calculated using the average of the closing prices of the Partnership’s Units for the ten
trading days prior to the payment date. 

  
 In addition to the foregoing, each independent director is reimbursed for out-of-pocket expenses in connection with attending meetings of the board of directors or committees.
From: Angus Crane [ mailto:acrane@naima.org ] Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2012 10:59 PM To: Reeves, David Subject: Fwd: Question

See response from Guardian.

Sent from my iPad

Begin forwarded message:

From: < gthomas@bp.Guardian.com > Date: December 11, 2012 5:49:20 PM EST To: Angus Crane < acrane@naima.org > Subject: Re: Question

Angus, here you go:

Albion, Michigan

- Major

Inw ood, WV

- Major

Kingman, Arizona

- Synthetic Minor

- Area

- Shutdown

Mineral Wells, Mississippi

- Major

Winnsboro, South Carolina

- Major

- Shutdown

Kind regards,

Grover Thomas

|

------------ > | From: | |

------------ >

------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------------- | |Angus Crane

< acrane@naima.org > |

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------------- ||

------------ > | To: | |

------------ >

------ ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------------- | |"' gthomas@bp.Guardian.com ' ( gthomas@bp.Guardian.com )"

< gthomas@bp.Guardian.com > |

------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------

----------------------------- | |

------------ > | Date: | |

------------ >

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

------------------------- ---- | |12/11/2012 05:15 PM |

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----------------

----------------------------- | |

------------ > | Subject: | |

------------ >

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------------- | |Question |

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---- ------------------------- |

Can you give me the major/area source status Of Inwood, West Virginia; Mineral Wells, Mississippi; and Winnsboro, South Carolina? Sincerely,

Angus E. Crane Executive Vice President, General Counsel North American Insulat ion Manufacturers AssociationPh: (703) 684

- 0084 ext. 123 Fax: (703) 684

- 0427

Visit NAIMA online at: www.NAIMA.org www.PipeInsulation.org
#### § 603.220 Government participation.

A TIA is used to carry out cooperative relationships between the Federal Government and the recipient(s) which require substantial involvement of the Government in the execution of the RD&D. For example, program officials will participate in recipients' periodic reviews of progress and may be substantially involved with the recipients in the resulting revisions of plans for future effort.
#### In the Matter of Edward Beermann, Doing Business as Despatch Moving *&*Storage Company, Appellant, v. Joseph C. Di Carlo, as Commissioner of the Department of Licenses of the City of New York, Respondent.

Order entered June 25, 1965 denying petitioner’s motion for judgment and judgment entered July 30, 1965 dismissing the petition in this article 78 proceeding unanimously affirmed, without costs or disbursements. We appreciate the candor of the Corporation Counsel in conceding the variance between Specification No. 1 and the proof. The hearing proceeded on the theory that petitioner overcharged in that his employees arrived later than the time from which the charges were computed and they unnecessarily delayed and prolonged the work. All parties understood the nature and extent of the charges and the petitioner makes no point of the variance. We do not find it necessary to resolve the statutory construction questions raised by the appellant, by reason of the fact that there was no departure from the effective tariff. Concur-—Steuer, J. P., Capozzoli, Tilzer, McNally and Bastow, JJ.
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23
Santa Fe Gaming Corporation
Las Vegas, Nevada

We have made a review, in accordance with Statements on Standards for Accounting
and Review Services issued by the American Institute of Certified Public
Accountants, of the unaudited interim financial information of Santa Fe Gaming
Corporation and subsidiaries for the three and nine month periods ended June 30,
1997 and 1996, as indicated in our report dated August 11, 1997 because we did
not perform an audit, we expressed  no opinion on that information.

We are aware that our report referred to above, which is included in your
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1997 is
incorporated by reference in Registration Statement No. 33-44700 on Form S-8 and
in post-effective Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement No. 33-7053 on Form
S-8.

We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under
the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration
Statement prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or
certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that act.


DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Las Vegas, Nevada
August 14, 1997
#### § 600.116 Resource Conservation and Recovery Act.

Under the Act (Pub. L. 94-580 codified at 42 U.S.C. 6962), any State agency or agency of a political subdivision of a State which is using appropriated Federal funds must comply with section 6002. Section 6002 requires that preference be given in procurement programs to the purchase of specific products containing recycled materials identified in guidelines developed by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (40 CFR parts 247-254). Accordingly, State and local institutions of higher education, hospitals, and non-profit organizations that receive direct Federal awards or other Federal funds shall give preference in their procurement programs funded with Federal funds to the purchase of recycled products pursuant to the EPA guidelines.
Form of Notification of Participation



 Exhibit 10.1 
 (Form for CEO) 
 CYBEX INTERNATIONAL, INC.

 NOTIFICATION OF PARTICIPATION 
 2010 MANAGEMENT INCENTIVE COMPENSATION BONUS PROGRAM 
 This confirms that
John Aglialoro (“you”) have been designated a participant in the 2010 management incentive compensation bonus program (the “Program”) of Cybex International, Inc. (“Cybex”) adopted by the Cybex Compensation Committee
and the Board of Directors pursuant to Section 9 of the 2005 Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan. 
 Pursuant to the
Program, you will be eligible for a bonus equal to the indicated percentage of your base salary, in the event that the 2010 operating income of Cybex (before taking into account bonuses payable under the Program) equals or exceeds the indicated
level as set by the Cybex Compensation Committee: 
  

			
	Percentage of Base Salary	 	Operating Income
		
	10%	 	Threshold
		
	40%	 	Target
		
	75%	 	Maximum

 The Program is
subject to such rules, policies and procedures as may be from time to time adopted by the Board of Directors or the Compensation Committee acting on behalf of the Board of Directors, including the requirement that at the time that the bonus becomes
payable you are employed in good standing with Cybex. 
 The bonus will be payable, if at all, within thirty days after receipt
by Cybex of its audited financial statements for 2010. As an Executive Officer, any bonus to you will be payable 75% in cash and 25% in restricted stock, with the restricted stock vesting in three equal annual installments commencing with the first
anniversary of the bonus payment date. 
 Eligibility to participate in the Program does not restrict Cybex from discharging you
from employment or increasing or decreasing your compensation, nor does it restrict you from resigning your employment. Your participation in this program supersedes, replaces in full, and is in lieu of, any understanding, commitment or agreement
(whether written, oral, express or implied) with respect to incentive compensation related to 2010 performance which might otherwise be or become payable to you, other than stock options which have been or may be granted to you. All calculations,
determinations and interpretations under this Program shall be made solely by the Board of Directors or the Compensation Committee acting on behalf of the Board of Directors. 
 Dated: February     , 2010 








			
	CYBEX INTERNATIONAL, INC.
		
	By:
2007-1878.

#### State ex rel. Talley v. Collins.

In Mandamus. On answer of respondents. On S.Ct.Prae.R. X(5) determination, cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.
#### § 434.513 Occupancy.

5131 Occupancy schedules are default assumptions. The same assumptions shall be made in computing Design Energy Consumption as were used in calculating the Energy Cost Budget.

513.2 Table 513.2.a, Occupancy Density, establishes the density, in ft2 person of conditioned floor area, to be used for each building type. Table 513.2.b, Building Schedule Percentage Multipliers, establishes the percentage of total occupants in the building by hour of the day for each building type.

Table 513.2. a—Occupancy Density

| Building type | Conditioned floor area Ft2 person |
| --- | --- |
| Assembly | 50 |
| Office | 275 |
| Retail | 300 |
| Warehouse | 15000 |
| School | 75 |
| Hotel/Motel | 250 |
| Restaurant | 100 |
| Health/Institutional | 200 |
| Multi-family High-rise Residential | 2 per unit .1 |
| | |
| --- | --- |
| 1 Heat generation: Btu/h per person: 230 Btu/h per person sensible, and 190 Btu/h per person latent. See Tables 512.2 a and b. | |

[![](https://img.federalregister.gov/ER06OC00.012/ER06OC00.012_large.png)](https://img.federalregister.gov/ER06OC00.012/ER06OC00.012_original_size.png)
[![](https://img.federalregister.gov/ER06OC00.013/ER06OC00.013_large.png)](https://img.federalregister.gov/ER06OC00.013/ER06OC00.013_original_size.png)
[![](https://img.federalregister.gov/ER06OC00.014/ER06OC00.014_large.png)](https://img.federalregister.gov/ER06OC00.014/ER06OC00.014_original_size.png)
[![](https://img.federalregister.gov/ER06OC00.015/ER06OC00.015_large.png)](https://img.federalregister.gov/ER06OC00.015/ER06OC00.015_original_size.png)
[![](https://img.federalregister.gov/ER06OC00.016/ER06OC00.016_large.png)](https://img.federalregister.gov/ER06OC00.016/ER06OC00.016_original_size.png)
#### MATHESON v. MENTE et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

June 5, 1914.)

Action by Malcolm Ross Matheson, as substituted trustee, etc., of Richard J. Stainton, deceased, against Ottilie E. Mente and others.

No opinion. Motion granted, and order-signed. See, also, 147 N. Y. Supp. 1126; 148 N. Y. Supp. 1130.
§ 11.13 Special requirements for transportation. ( a ) All individuals who, after 365 days following approval of the amended security plan submitted in accordance with § 11.11(a), transport, arrange for transport, drive motor vehicles in road shipments of special nuclear material, pilot aircraft in air shipments of special nuclear material, act as monitors at transfer points, or escort road, rail, sea, or air shipments of special nuclear material subject to the appropriate physical protection requirements of §§ 73.20, 73.25, 73.26, or 73.27 of this chapter, or who are authorized to alter the scheduling and routing of such transport shall have NRC-U special nuclear material access authorization. Exceptions are provided for: ( 1 ) Any individual who is employed in such a job on October 28, 1985 and who is not yet in receipt of an NRC-U special nuclear material access authorization from the Commission, provided that a complete application has been submitted to and is pending before the NRC for processing for that employee in accordance with § 11.15 (a) and (b) or
( 2 ) Any individual in possession of an NRC-L or R access authorization or equivalent active Federal security clearance but not yet in receipt of the NRC-U special nuclear material access authorization, provided that a complete application has been submitted to and is pending before the NRC for processing for that employee in accordance with § 11.15 (a) or (b), or both.
( b ) Each licensee who, 365 days after Commission approval of the amended security plan submitted in accordance with § 11.11(a), transports or delivers to a carrier for transport special nuclear material subject to the physical protection requirement of §§ 73.20, 73.25, 73.26, or 73.27 of this chapter shall confirm and record prior to shipment the name and special nuclear material access authorization number of all individuals identified in paragraph (a) of this section assigned to the shipment. The licensee shall retain this record for three years after the last shipment is made. However, the licensee need not confirm and record the special nuclear material access authorization number in the case of any individual for whom an application has been submitted and is pending before the NRC in accordance with paragraph (a) of this section.
[50 FR 39078, Sept. 27, 1985, as amended at 53 FR 19245, May 27, 1988]