alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | Corporate Trust Services

MAC R1204-0109062 Old Annapolis RoadColumbia, MD 21045Tel: 410 884 2000 Fax: 410 715 2380 |
|--------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation 

60 WALL ST

NEW YORK, New York 10005-2836

 

 

RE: Annual Statement of Compliance for COMM 2012-CCRE4 Commercial Mortgage Pass -Through Certificates Series 2012-CCRE4

 

 

Per the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of November 1, 2012 (the "Agreement"), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Certificate Administrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2015 (the "Reporting Period"):

 

(a) A review of Wells Fargo's activities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under such officer's supervision; and

 

(b) To the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

 March 1, 2016

 

 

/s/ Brian Smith

BRIAN SMITH

Vice President

 

 

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Editorial Note on Part 26
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 26 appear at 87 FR 71455, Nov. 22, 2022.

§ 26.111 Checking the acceptability of the urine specimen. ( a ) Immediately after the donor provides the urine specimen to the collector, including specimens of less than 30 mL but equal to or greater than 15 mL, the collector shall measure the temperature of the specimen. The temperature-measuring device used must accurately reflect the temperature of the specimen and not contaminate the specimen. The time from urination to temperature measurement may not exceed 4 minutes. If the temperature of a urine specimen is outside the range of 90 °F to 100 °F (32 °C to 38 °C), that is a reason to believe the donor may have altered (*e.g.,* adulterated or diluted) or substituted the specimen.
( b ) Immediately after the donor provides a urine specimen, including specimens of less than 30 mL but equal to or greater than 15 mL, the collector shall also inspect the specimen to determine its color and clarity and look for any signs of contaminants or adulteration. The collector shall note any unusual findings on the Federal CCF or through another documentation method consistent with the collection procedures of the licensee or other entity.
( c ) If there is reason to believe that the donor may have attempted to dilute, substitute, or adulterate the specimen based on specimen temperature or other observations made during the collection, the collector shall contact the FFD program manager, who may consult with the MRO, to determine whether the donor has attempted to subvert the testing process or whether other circumstances may explain the observations. The FFD program manager or MRO may require the donor to provide a second specimen as soon as possible under direct observation. In addition, the collector shall inform the donor that he or she may volunteer to submit a second specimen under direct observation to counter the reason to believe the donor may have altered (*e.g.,* adulterated or diluted) or substituted the specimen.
( d ) Any specimen of 15 mL or more that the collector suspects has been diluted, substituted, or adulterated, and any specimen of 15 mL or more that has been collected under direct observation under paragraph (c) of this section, must be sent directly to the HHS-certified laboratory for initial and, if required, confirmatory testing, and may not be subject to initial testing at a licensee testing facility.
( e ) As much of the suspect specimen as possible must be preserved, except under the conditions described in § 26.107(d)(4).
[73 FR 17176, Mar. 31, 2008, as amended at 87 FR 71458, Nov. 22, 2022]
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION

J.B., a minor child, by and )

through his next friend, )

Addie Ward, on behalf of )

himself and all others )

similarly situated, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

v. ) 2:06cv755-MHT

) 

WALTER WOOD, in his )

individual capacity, )

)

Defendant. )

J.B., a minor child, by and )

through his next friend, )

Addie Ward, on behalf of )

himself and all others )

similarly situated, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

v. ) 2:06cv908-MHT

) 

WALTER WOOD, in his )

individual capacity, )

)

Defendant. )

Case 2:06-cv-00755-MHT-CSC Document 14 Filed 11/01/2006 Page 1 of 2
ORDER

The court being of the opinion that these two cases have

common questions of law and fact, it is ORDERED that,

pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 42(a):

(1) The motion to consolidate cases (doc. no. 4), in

civil action no. 2:06cv908-MHT, is granted.

(2) The above two cases are consolidated.

(3) Civil action no 2:06cv755-MHT shall be the lead

case. 

DONE, this the 1st day of November, 2006.

 /s/ Myron H. Thompson 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00755-MHT-CSC Document 14 Filed 11/01/2006 Page 2 of 2
ex10-43.htm


    EXHIBIT
10.43

     

    
      First
Amendment

      to

      Employment
Agreement

      


      This
First Amendment (the
“First Amendment”) to Employment Agreement is made
this 27h day
of September, 2008, by and between ImageWare Systems, Inc., a Delaware
corporation (the “Company”), on the one hand, and S. James Miller, Chairman of
the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, on the other
hand (the “Executive”).  

                          

      WHEREAS, the Company and the
Executive entered into an Employment Agreement dated as of September 27, 2005
(the “Employment Agreement”); and

      


      WHEREAS, the Executive
continues to perform valuable services for the Company and the Company desires
to assure itself of the continuing services of Executive; and

      


      WHEREAS, in consideration of
the foregoing and in order to amend the terms of the Agreement and to provide
for the continued services of the Executive in accordance with the present
intent of the Company and the Executive.

      


      NOW THEREFORE, in
consideration of the foregoing and for other good and valuable consideration,
receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, and in further consideration of the
mutual covenants contained in the Employment Agreement, the parties do hereby
agree that the Employment Agreement is hereby amended as follows:

      


      Section “2. Term of
Agreement”  strike the
language “continue until the third anniversary of the Effective Date” and
replace it with “continue until June 30, 2009”.

      


      


      


      


      _________________________________                                           _________________________________

      


      ImageWare
Systems,
Inc.                                                                           S.
James Miller
2007-2158.

#### State ex rel. Oko v. McDonnell.

Cuyahoga App. No. 90119, 2007-Ohio-5331. This cause was filed as a discretionary appeal and claimed appeal of right. Upon consideration of appellant’s jurisdictional memorandum, it is determined by the court that this cause originated in the court of appeals and should proceed as an appeal of right pursuant to S.CtPrae.R. II(1)(A)(1).

*1416It is ordered by the court that the Clerk shall issue an order for the transmission of the record from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County, and the parties shall brief this case in accordance with S.Ct.Prae.R. VI.
Subpart 2429.1 - General

Parent topic: PART 2429 - TAXES

2429.101 Resolving tax problems.

In order to have uniformity in HUD's treatment of the tax aspects of contracting and ensure effective

cooperation with other Government agencies on tax matters of mutual interest, the Office of General

Counsel has the responsibility within HUD for handling all those tax problems. Therefore, the

contracting activity will not engage in negotiation with any taxing authority for the purpose of

determining the validity or applicability of, or obtaining exemptions from or refund of, any tax. When

a problem exists, the Contracting Officer shall request, in writing, the assistance of legal counsel.

The request shall detail the problem and be accompanied by appropriate backup data. Counsel shall

report to the Contracting Officer as to the necessary disposition of the tax problem. The Contracting

Officer will notify the contractor of the outcome of the tax problem. Counsel is responsible for

communications with the Department of Justice for representation or intervention in proceedings

concerning taxes.
H. Res. 439

In the House of Representatives, U.S., 

September 15, 2005.

Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it 

shall be in order without intervention of any point of order 

to consider in the House the resolution (H. Res. 437) to establish the Select Bipartisan Committee to Investigate the 

Preparation for and Response to Hurricane Katrina. The resolution shall be considered as read. The previous question 

shall be considered as ordered on the resolution to final adoption without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate equally divided and controlled by the chairman and 

ranking minority member of the Committee on Rules; and (2) 

one motion to recommit which may not contain instructions. 

Attest:

Clerk.
EXHIBIT 32

                  Certification of Chief Executive Officer and
                      Chief Financial Officer pursuant to
                  8 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002.

                                  CERTIFICATION

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Water Chef, Inc., a Delaware
corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2005
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350 as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge and upon a review
of the Report that:

(1) the Report of the Company filed today pursuant to Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

This certification is based upon, among other things, my responsibilities as
Chief Executive Officer, my own due diligence and representations made by
certain members of the Company's senior management.





Dated: 8/12/05


                                            /s/  David A. Conway
                                            ----------------------------------
                                                 David A. Conway
                                                 President,
                                                 Chief Executive Officer and
                                                 Chief Financial Officer
2845.105-70 Contractor reporting of

Government-furnished property.

(a) In compliance with FAR 45.105, by January 31 of each year, DOJ contractors shall furnish the

cognizant contracting officer an annual report of the DOJ property for which they are accountable as

of the end of the calendar year.

(b) By March 1 of each year, bureaus shall submit to the FASS, JMD, a summary report of agency

property furnished under each contract as of the end of the calendar year. The report shall include a

listing of Government-furnished property for all contracts for which the bureau maintains the official

Government records.

Parent topic: Subpart 2845.1 - General
#### § 600.150 Purpose of reports and records.

Sections 600.151 through 600.153 set forth the procedures for monitoring and reporting on the recipient's financial and program performance and the necessary standard reporting forms. They also set forth record retention requirements.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-7985
DOMINICK THOMAS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus MARK L. HARMON, Officer; ASTRID S. ROBINSON, Officer, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (CA-04-1145-1-LMB) Submitted: June 28, 2006 Decided: July 28, 2006 Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Dominick Thomas, Appellant Pro Se. Mary Alice Rowan, COUNTY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Prince William, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* Although the last name of the defendant/appellee is apparently Harman rather than Harmon, we have retained the spelling employed by the district court. - 2 - PER CURIAM: Dominick Thomas appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Thomas v. Harmon , No. CA-04-1145-1-LMB (E.D. Va. Dec. 7, 2005). * We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Case 2:06-cv-00771-ID-SRW Document 8 Filed 09/15/2006 Page 1 of 1
PGI 232.604 Demand for payment.

(1) For contract debts resulting from other than a termination for default, the office that first

determines an amount due, whether it be the contract administration office, the contracting office,

the disbursing office, or the selling office/agency, shall—

(i) Make a demand for payment; and

(ii) Provide a copy of the demand to the payment office cited in the contract.

(2) For contract debts resulting from a termination for default, the contracting officer shall make the

demand and direct the debtor to make such payment to the designated office.

Parent topic: PGI 232.6 -CONTRACT DEBTS
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 50 (Thursday, March 14, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 16357]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-05908]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Research, Engineering and Development Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Notice of Meeting. Pursuant to section 10(A) (2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463; 5 U.S.C. App. 2), notice is 
hereby given of a meeting of the FAA Research, Engineering and 
Development (R,E&D) Advisory Committee.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Name: Research, Engineering & Development Advisory Committee.
    Time and Date: April 24--8:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.
    Place: Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Avenue 
SW.--Round Room (10th Floor), Washington, DC 20591.
    Purpose: The meeting agenda will include receiving from the 
Committee guidance for FAA's research and development investments in 
the areas of air traffic services, airports, aircraft safety, human 
factors and environment and energy. Attendance is open to the 
interested public but seating is limited. Persons wishing to attend the 
meeting or obtain information should contact Gloria Dunderman at (202) 
267-8937 or gloria.dunderman@faa.gov. Members of the public may present 
a written statement to the Committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC on March 8, 2013.
Catherine A. Bigelow,
Manager, Research and Development Management Division.
[FR Doc. 2013-05908 Filed 3-13-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
(October 31, 1980)

#### In the Matter of William J. Daetsch.

Order entered terminating suspension and reinstating petitioner as an attorney and counselor at law. Present — Cardamone, J. P., Simons, Hancock, Jr., Schnepp and Witmer, JJ.
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 973 

To amend title 49, United States Code, to modify the criteria for selecting 

communities to participate in the Small Community Air Service Development Program, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 7, 2017 

Mr. O’ROURKE (for himself, Mr. LAMBORN, Mr. HURD, and Ms. BORDALLO) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 

Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To amend title 49, United States Code, to modify the criteria 

for selecting communities to participate in the Small 

Community Air Service Development Program, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘21st Century SCASDP 

5 Act’’. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 973 IH

1 SEC. 2. SMALL COMMUNITY AIR SERVICE DEVELOPMENT 

2 PROGRAM. 

3 Section 41743(c)(1) of title 49, United States Code, 

4 is amended to read as follows: 

5 ‘‘(1) SIZE.—On the date of the most recent no6 tice of order soliciting community proposals issued 

7 by the Secretary under this section, the airport serv8 ing the community or consortium— 

9 ‘‘(A) is not larger than a small hub air10 port, as determined using the Department of 

11 Transportation’s most recent published classi12 fication; and 

13 ‘‘(B)(i) has insufficient air carrier service; 

14 or 

15 ‘‘(ii) has unreasonably high air fares.’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Chemistry and Stoichiometry of PMN Substance Manufacture
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

 _____________________________

JAMES TYRONE EDWARDS, *

#244 859

Plaintiff, *

v. * 3:06-CV-740-MHT

SGT. MOORE, et al., *

Defendants. *

 _____________________________

ORDER ON MOTION

Upon consideration of Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time, and for good cause,

it is ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time (Doc. No. 20) is GRANTED; and

2. Plaintiff is GRANTED an extension from December 27, 2006 to January 17, 2007

to file his response to Defendants' written report.

DONE, this 4th day of January 2007.

 /s/Susan Russ Walker 

SUSAN RUSS WALKER

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-00740-MHT-SRW Document 21 Filed 01/04/2007 Page 1 of 1
confidential







Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





To the Board of Directors

Situs Holdings, LLC





We have examined management’s assertion, included in the accompanying Certification
Regarding Compliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria (Management’s Assertion), that Situs Holdings, LLC (the Company)
complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Items 1122(d)(3)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(vii) of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s
(SEC) Regulation AB (the applicable servicing criteria) for services by the Company that are encompassed by contractual obligations
to perform Regulation AB reporting for the Operating or Trust Advisor Services Platform (the “Platform”), including
only those asset-backed securities transactions defined below, as of and for the year ended December 31, 2018. Appendix B
to management’s assertion identifies the individual asset-backed transactions defined by management as constituting the Platform.
Management is responsible for Situs Holdings, LLC’s compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our responsibility
is to express an opinion on management’s assertion about the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicing criteria
based on our examination.



Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about
the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicing criteria, including tests on a sample basis of the servicing activities
related to the Platform, determining whether the Company performed those activities in compliance with the servicing criteria during
the specified period and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our procedures were
limited to selected servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report and, accordingly, such
samples may not have included servicing activities related to each asset-backed transaction in the Platform. Further, an examination
is not designed to detect noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurred prior to the period specified above that may
have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report. We believe
that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the
Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria.



In our opinion, management’s assertion that Situs Holdings, LLC complied
with the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2018, for the Platform is
fairly stated, in all material respects.





Duluth, Minnesota

January 31, 2019









1

confidential
Exhibit 32.2

Citizens Financial Corp.

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley

Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

I, Thomas K. Derbyshire, Vice President, Treasurer and Principal Financial Officer of Citizens Financial Corp. (the company) certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
that:



|1. | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the company for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|              |  |                            
|------------- |  | ---------------------------
|Date: 5/10/06 |  | /s/ Thomas K. Derbyshire   
|              |  | Thomas K. Derbyshire       
|              |  | Vice President, Treasurer  
|              |  | Principal Financial Officer



45