alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2023164EN.01010301.xml

| 29.6.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 164/103 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.6.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 164/103

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE No 351/2022

of 9 December 2022

amending Annex XX (Environment) to the EEA Agreement [2023/1293]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (“the EEA Agreement”), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/691 of 28 April 2022 amending Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/2323 establishing the European List of ship recycling facilities pursuant to Regulation (EU) No 1257/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/691 of 28 April 2022 amending Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/2323 establishing the European List of ship recycling facilities pursuant to Regulation (EU) No 1257/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex XX to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex XX to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following indent is added in point 32fhd (Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/2323) of Annex XX to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘- | 32022 D 0691: Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/691 of 28 April 2022 (OJ L 128, 2.5.2022, p. 84).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘-

32022 D 0691: Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/691 of 28 April 2022 (OJ L 128, 2.5.2022, p. 84).’

Article 2

The text of Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/691 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 10 December 2022, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 9 December 2022.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Kristján Andri STEFÁNSSON

---

(1)  
  OJ L 128, 2.5.2022, p. 84.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
* Pursua nt to 5 T H C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED

May 27, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-60932

CATHERINE ALDRIDGE, Administratix of the estate of Bonnie M. Stigger, for the use and benefit of the estate of Bonnie M. Stigger, and for the use and benefit of the wrongful death

of Bonnie M. Stigger; CATHERINE ALDRIDGE,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

versus

J. D. LEE; GEORGE D. MORGAN; BOYD P. GENTRY; NATIONAL HERITAGE REALTY, INC., formerly known as Southmark Heritage Corp.; EVERGREEN HEALTHCARE, INC.; GRANCARE LLC, formerly known as Grancare, Inc.; MARINER HEALTH CARE, INC., formerly known as Mariner Post-Acute Network, Inc.; CHARLES W. FRANCIS; JOHN DOES, 1 Through 10; and Unidentified Entities 1 through 10; (as to Clinton Health and Rehabilitation Center),

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi

(3:03-CV-124)

Before KING, Chief Judge, and BARKSDALE and STEWART, Circuit

Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

In the light of Gray v. Beverly Enterprises, Inc.
, 390 F.3d

400 (5th Cir. 2004), the district court’s r emand-denial and2

dismissal of Charles W. Francis are VACATED ; and this matter is

REMANDED to the district court for remand to state court.

VACATED and REMANDED
# Subpart 1233.1—Protests

**Parent topic:**PART 1233—PROTESTS, DISPUTES, AND APPEALS

## 1233.103 Protests to the agency.

(c) DOT Operating Administrations (OAs) shall consider the use of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) in all agency protest actions.   

## 1233.104 Protests to GAO.

The protest process at the Government Accountability Office (GAO) may include ADR assistance by GAO. The contracting officer shall, with advice of counsel, explore the possibility of using ADR for all GAO protests.
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 20 (Friday, January 30, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 5193]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-01829]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Thirteenth Meeting: RTCA Special Committee 227, Standards of 
Navigation Performance

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), U.S. Department of 
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Meeting Notice of RTCA Special Committee 227, Standards of 
Navigation Performance.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of the 
thirteenth meeting of the RTCA Special Committee 227, Standards of 
Navigation Performance.

DATES: The meeting will be held March 16-20 from 9:00 a.m.-4:30 p.m.

ADDRESSES: RTCA Headquarters, 1150 18th Street NW., Suite 910, 
Washington, DC 20036.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The RTCA Secretariat, 1150 18th Street 
NW., Suite 910, Washington, DC 20036, or by telephone at (202) 330-0662 
or (202) 833-9339, fax at (202) 833-9434, or Web site at http://www.rtca.org. In addition, Sophie Bousquet may be contacted directly at 
email: sbousquet@rtca.org.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., App.), notice is 
hereby given for a meeting of Special Committee 227. The agenda will 
include the following:

March 16-20, 2015

 Welcome/Introductions/Administrative Remarks
 Agenda Overview
 Overview of Planned Work Program for the Week
    [cir] Working Group 2 MOPS Change Proposals
    [cir] MOPS Draft Review
    [cir] SC-186 proposed addition to MASPS Appendix
 Plenary Review/Discussion
    [cir] Planned Work Schedule (Note, schedule subject to change)
    [cir] MOPS Change Proposals for Incorporation into draft MOPS
 Technical Requirements Breakout Sessions (as needed)
 Other Business
 Adjourn

    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairman, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present 
statements or obtain information should contact the person listed in 
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Members of the public may 
present a written statement to the committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on January 27, 2015.
Mohannad Dawoud,
Management Analyst, NextGen, Program Oversight and Administration, 
Federal Aviation Administration.
[FR Doc. 2015-01829 Filed 1-29-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
#### § 434.504 Use of the prototype building to determine the energy cost budget.

504.1 Determine the building type of the Proposed Design using the categories in subsection 503.1. Using the appropriate Prototype Building characteristics from all of the tables contained in subpart E, the building shall be simulated using the same gross floor area and number of floors for the Prototype Building as in the Proposed Design.

504.2 The form, orientation, occupancy and use profiles for the Prototype Building shall be fixed as described in subsection 511. Envelope, lighting, other internal loads and HVAC systems and equipment shall meet the requirements of subsection 301, 401, 402, 403, and 404 and are standardized inputs.
MEDIATION REFERRALS

The following cases have been referred to mediation pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. XIV(6):

2008-0183.

#### State ex rel. Clark v. Air Technologies, Inc.

Franklin App. No. 07AP-153.
PGI 207.108 Additional requirements for

telecommuting.

Contracting officers should avoid specifying unnecessarily restrictive places of performance, to the

maximum extent practicable, in accordance with section 875 of the National Defense Authorization

Act for Fiscal Year 2022.

Parent topic: PGI 207.1 -ACQUISITION PLANS
§ 1303.110 Notice of anticipated fees. ( a ) *General.* The Board shall advise the requetor in writing of any applicable fees. If only a part of the fee can be estimated readily, the Board shall advise the requestor that this may be only a part of the total fee. After the requestor has been sent a fee estimate, the request shall not be considered received until the requestor makes a firm commitment to pay the anticipated total fee. Any such agreement must be made by the requestor in writing and must be received within 60 days of the Board's notice. If the requestor does not provide a firm commitment to pay the anticipated fee within 60 days of the notice, the request shall be closed. The requestor may be given an opportunity to work with the Board to change the requests and lower the cost.
( b ) *Charges for other services.* When the Board chooses as a matter of administrative discretion to provide a special service, such as certifying that records are true copies or sending them by other than ordinary mail, the Board shall pay the costs of providing the service unless previous arrangements have been made with the requestor.
( c ) *Charging interest.* The Board may charge interest on any unpaid bill starting on the 31st day following the date of billing. Interest charges shall be assessed at the rate provided in 31 U.S.C. 3717 and shall accrue from the date of the billing until payment is received by the Board. The Board shall follow the provisions of the Debt Collection Act of 1982 (Pub. L. 97-365, 96 Stat. 1749), as amended.
( d ) *Aggregating requests.* If the Board reasonably believes that a requestor or a group of requestors acting together is trying to divide a request into a series of smaller requests for the purpose of avoiding fees, the Board may aggregate the requests and charge accordingly. The Board shall assume that multiple requests of the same type made within a 30-day period have been made in order to avoid fees. If requests are separated by a longer period, the Board shall aggregate them only if there is a solid basis for determining that aggregation is warranted. Multiple requests involving unrelated matters shall not be aggregated.
( e ) *Advance payments.* Where a requestor has previously failed to pay promptly a properly charged FOIA fee to the Board or another agency, the Board shall require proof that full payment has been made to that agency before it begins to process that requestor's FOIA. The Board shall also require advance payment of the full amount of the anticipated fee. When advance payment is required, the request is not considered received until payment has been made.
PGI 232.409-1 Recommendation for approval.       To ensure uniform application of this subpart (see FAR 32.402(e)(1)), the departmental/agency contract financing office shall prepare the documents required by FAR 32.409-1(e) and (f).    **Parent topic:** PGI 232.409 RESERVED
#### Lois Madison, Appellee, v. Jack Essington, Appellant.

Gen. No. 9,560.

opinion filed September 19, 1940;

rehearing denied October 15, 1940.

Jones & Heflin, for appellant; Winslow J. Painter, for appellee.

Opinion by

Justice Dove.

“Not to be published, in full.”
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5         Financial Data Schedule for 2nd Quarter 10-Q
<CIK> 0000764841
<NAME> COMPUTER TELEPHONE CORP.

<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

       
<S>                                     <C>  
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       Mar-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                            Sep-30-1995
<CASH>                                  3,321
<SECURITIES>                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                           5,168
<ALLOWANCES>                            128
<INVENTORY>                             26
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        8,933
<PP&E>                                  5,603
<DEPRECIATION>                          4,448
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          10,267
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   3,048
<BONDS>                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                             0
<COMMON>                                0
<OTHER-SE>                              7,171
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            10,267
<SALES>                                 8,070
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        8,114
<CGS>                                   994
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           6,521
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         1,594
<INCOME-TAX>                            645
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     949
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                            949
<EPS-PRIMARY>                           0.18
<EPS-DILUTED>                           0.18
        


</TABLE>
```

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 5 (Friday, January 8, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 1028-1029]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: X10-90108]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CHEMICAL SAFETY AND HAZARD INVESTIGATION BOARD

Senior Executive Service Performance Review Board

AGENCY: Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces a change in the membership of the Senior 
Executive Service Performance Review Board for the Chemical Safety and 
Hazard Investigation Board (CSB).

DATES: Effective January 8, 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christopher Kirkpatrick, Office of 
General Counsel, (202) 261-7600.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 5 U.S.C. 4314(c)(1) requires each agency to 
establish, in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Office of 
Personnel Management, a performance review board (PRB). The PRB reviews 
initial performance ratings of members of the Senior Executive Service 
(SES) and makes recommendations as to final annual performance ratings 
for senior executives. Because the CSB is a small independent Federal 
agency, the SES members of the CSB's PRB are drawn from other Federal 
agencies.
    The Chairperson of the CSB has appointed the following individual 
to the CSB Senior Executive Service Performance Review Board:
    PRB Member--Gary L. Halbert, General Counsel, National 
Transportation Safety Board.
    Mr. Halbert replaces Curtis Bowling (Director of Environmental 
Readiness and Safety, Office of the Secretary of Defense/Chairman, 
Department of

[[Page 1029]]

Defense Explosives Safety Board). The service of Mr. Bowling on the PRB 
has come to a close. His appointment was originally announced in the 
Federal Register of November 15, 2007 (72 FR 64192).
    William B. Wark (CSB Board Member) continues to serve as the Chair 
of the PRB, as announced in the Federal Register of November 15, 2007 
(72 FR 64192). David Capozzi (Executive Director, United States Access 
Board) continues to serve as a Member of the PRB, as announced in the 
Federal Register of December 5, 2008 (73 FR 74138).
    This notice is published in the Federal Register pursuant to the 
requirement of 5 U.S.C. 4314(c)(4).

    Dated: January 4, 2010.
Christopher J. Kirkpatrick,
Attorney-Advisor.
[FR Doc. 2010-104 Filed 1-7-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6350-01-P
```
#### Eximetals Corporation v Pinheiro Guimaraes, S.A.

Motion for resettlement granted so as to permit appellants to appeal to the Court of Appeals upon the following certified question: "Was the order of the Supreme Court, as affirmed by this court, properly made?” Concur — Kupferman, J. P., Ross, Lupiano and Silverman, JJ.
# L_2023227EN.01003801.xml

| 14.9.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 227/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.9.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 227/38

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE No 170/2020

of 23 October 2020

amending Annex XXII (Company law) to the EEA Agreement [2023/1745]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (“the EEA Agreement”), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/1910 of 28 October 2016 on the equivalence of the reporting requirements of certain third countries on payments to governments to the requirements of Chapter 10 of Directive 2013/34/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/1910 of 28 October 2016 on the equivalence of the reporting requirements of certain third countries on payments to governments to the requirements of Chapter 10 of Directive 2013/34/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex XXII to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex XXII to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following point is inserted after point 10i (Directive 2013/34/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council) of Annex XXII to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘10ia. | 32016 D 1910: Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/1910 of 28 October 2016 on the equivalence of the reporting requirements of certain third countries on payments to governments to the requirements of Chapter 10 of Directive 2013/34/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 295, 29.10.2016, p. 82).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘10ia.

32016 D 1910: Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/1910 of 28 October 2016 on the equivalence of the reporting requirements of certain third countries on payments to governments to the requirements of Chapter 10 of Directive 2013/34/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 295, 29.10.2016, p. 82).’

Article 2

The text of Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/1910 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 24 October 2020, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1), or on the day of the entry into force of Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 293/2015 of 30 October 2015 (2), whichever is the later.

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 23 October 2020.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Sabine MONAUNI

---

(1)  
  OJ L 295, 29.10.2016, p. 82.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

(2)  
  OJ L 161, 22.6.2017, p. 87.

2

---
Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 2, 2011
of Insteel Industries, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
    /s/ H. O. Woltz III

H. O. Woltz IIIPresident, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed December 5, 2018.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D18-296

Lower Tribunal Nos. 15-14939 & 16-20697

________________

The State of Florida, Department of Revenue,

Appellant,

vs.

In Re: Deborah Claudia Ezeta vs. Gregory

Francois Frederic De La Begassiere,

Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, David H.

Young, Judge.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Toni C. Bernstein (Tallahassee),

Senior Assistant Attorney General, for appellant.

Deborah Marks, PLLC, and Deborah B. Marks, for appellee Gregory

Francois Frederic de La Begassiere.

Before SCALES, LUCK and LINDSEY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.
Gregory Francois Frederic de La Begassiere, the father, petitioned the trial

court for a modification of monthly child support for his two minor children. After

a hearing on January 10, 2018, the trial court ordered a downward modification

from $1028.88 to $800.00 per month. Because de La Begassiere had left his job as

a high school teacher in South Florida and returned to his native France to continue

his own schooling, the trial court found that he was underemployed and imputed

income to him to arrive at the $800.00 figure. The State of Florida Department of

Revenue (Department), an intervenor below, appeals. Department maintains that

the trial court did not comply or make findings consistent with section 61.30 of the

Florida Statutes.

The record of the January 10, 2018 hearing reveals that the trial court and

the parties converted the hearing into a de facto settlement conference, during

which Department was represented by counsel who did not object to the downward

modification amount or the procedure the trial court employed to ascertain this

amount. We affirm the trial court’s order of January 10, 2018, because any alleged

error was not preserved. Chaiken v. Lewis, 754 So. 2d 118, 118 (Fla. 3d DCA

2000) (holding that a party that acquiesced to a trial court determination did not

preserve the issue for appellate review); Kitchens By Design v. Confino, 687 So.

2d 364, 365 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997) (“We affirm the final judgment under review as

2
the record does not reflect that the specific claim of error made on appeal was

argued and presented to the lower court.”).

Affirmed.

3
Exhibit
32





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The
undersigned hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the quarterly
report of United States Basketball League, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly
period ended November 30, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
contained in such quarterly report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material
respects the financial condition and results of operation of United States
Basketball League, Inc.





Date:  January
13, 2011





/s/ Daniel T. Meisenheimer
    IIIDaniel
      T. Meisenheimer IIIPresident





Date:  January
13, 2011





/s/ Richard C.
  MeisenheimerRichard
      C. MeisenheimerChief
      Financial Officer
#### §§ 600.11-600.12 [Reserved]