alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-31 Rule13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications.

 

 

I, Helaine M. Kaplan,certify that:

 

1. I have reviewedthis report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respectof the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of the COMM 2013-LC6 MortgageTrust (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

 

2. Based on myknowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3. Based on myknowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required tobe provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is includedin the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4. Based on myknowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report underItem 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Actperiodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under theservicing agreements in all material respects; and

 

5. All of the reportson assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securitiesand their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance withservicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in thisreport in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except asotherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliancedescribed in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving thecertifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me bythe following unaffiliated parties:

 

Midland LoanServices, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer,Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as Special Servicer, Wells Fargo Bank, NationalAssociation, as Trustee and Certificate Administrator, Wells Fargo Bank,National Association, as Custodian, and Park Bridge Lender Services LLC, asOperating Advisor.

 

 

 

Dated: March 22, 2019

 

/s/ Helaine M. Kaplan

 

 

President

(seniorofficer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
§ 603.1335 Termination. The cancellation of a TIA, in whole or in part, at any time prior to either: ( a ) The date on which all work under the TIA is completed; or
( b ) The date on which Federal sponsorship ends, as given in the award document or any supplement or amendment thereto.
# EUR-Lex - 31980L0049 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 31980L0049

**Council Directive 80/49/EEC of 20 December 1979 amending the First Directive on the establishment of common rules for certain types of carriage of goods by road between Member States **

*
Official Journal L 018 , 24/01/1980 P. 0023 - 0023 Finnish special edition: Chapter 7 Volume 2 P. 0119 Greek special edition: Chapter 07 Volume 2 P. 0122 Swedish special edition: Chapter 7 Volume 2 P. 0119 Spanish special edition: Chapter 07 Volume 2 P. 0203 Portuguese special edition Chapter 07 Volume 2 P. 0203 *

COUNCIL DIRECTIVE of 20 December 1979 amending the First Directive on the establishment of common rules for certain types of carriage of goods by road between Member States (80/49/EEC)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community, and in particular Article 75 (1) thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the Commission,

Having regard to the opinion of the European Parliament (1),

Having regard to the opinion of the Economic and Social Committee (2),

Whereas provision should be made under the First Council Directive of 23 July 1962 on the establishment of common rules for certain types of carriage of goods by road between Member States (3), as last amended by Directive 78/175/EEC (4), for exemption for own-account carriage, effected by undertakings, from all quotas and authorizations,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DIRECTIVE:

Article 1

Annex I to the First Council Directive of 23 July 1962 shall be amended as follows: 1. The following point shall be inserted:

"11. The carriage of goods in motor vehicles provided the following conditions are fulfilled: (a) the goods carried must be the property of the undertaking or must have been sold, bought, let out on hire or hired, produced, extracted, processed or repaired by the undertaking;

(b) the purpose of the journey must be to carry the goods to or from the undertaking or to move them, either inside the undertaking or outside for its own requirements;

(c) motor vehicles used for such carriage must be driven by employees of the undertaking;

(d) the vehicles carrying the goods must be owned by the undertaking or have been bought by it on deferred terms.

This provision shall not apply to the use of a replacement vehicle during a short breakdown of the vehicle normally used;

(e) carriage must be no more than ancillary to the overall activities of the undertaking."

2. Points 11 and 12 shall become points 12 and 13 respectively.

Article 2

Member States shall take the necessary steps to liberalize by 1 July 1980 at the latest, the types of transport referred to in Article 1.

Each Member State shall, within three months of notification of this Directive and in any event before 1 July 1980, inform the Commission of the measures taken to implement this Directive.

Article 3

This Directive is addressed to the Member States.

Done at Brussels, 20 December 1979.

For the Council

The President

J. TUNNEY (1)OJ No C 293, 13.12.1976, p. 50. (2)OJ No C 281, 27.11.1976, p. 2. (3)OJ No 70, 6.8.1962, p. 2005/62. (4)OJ No L 54, 25.2.1978, p. 18.
# Subpart 2022.1 - Basic Labor Policies

**Parent topic:**PART 2022 - APPLICATION OF LABOR LAWS TO GOVERNMENT ACQUISITIONS

## 2022.101-1 General.

The Head of the Contracting Activity shall designate programs or requirements for which it is necessary that contractors be required to notify the Government of actual or potential labor disputes that are delaying or threaten to delay the timely contract performance. Contractor notification shall be made in accordance with FAR 52.222-1, “Notice to the Government of Labor Disputes.”   

## 2022.103-4 Approvals.

The agency approving official for contractor overtime is the contracting officer.
#### THOMSON, Appellant, v. JACKSON-STEINWAY CO., Respondent, et al.

(Supreme Court; Appellate Division, First Department.

February 5, 1915.)

Action by Burton Thomson against the Jackson-Steinway Company, impleaded.

P. Bonynge, of New York City, for appellant. B. Scharps, of New York City, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Order filed.

LAUGHLIN, J., dissents.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 October 28, 2013

s1021

Order 

Clerk

October 28, 2013

147294

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 147294

COA: 311454

Wayne CC: 06-005849-FH

TIMOTHY ANTONIO HAZELY, Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 25, 2013 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered. We DIRECT former appellate counsel, Jay 

Courtright, to file a supplemental brief addressing the reason(s) for his failure to file in 

the trial court a timely motion to withdraw the defendant’s plea, and/or his failure to file 

in the Court of Appeals, on direct review, a delayed application for leave to appeal within 

the deadlines set forth in MCR 7.205(F), despite being appointed as counsel on 

September 25, 2006, approximately two weeks after the defendant was sentenced. 

Counsel shall file the supplemental brief within 28 days of the date of this order. 

The application for leave to appeal remains pending.
**MEMORANDUM**

DATE: July

27, 2015 TO: Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket I d: OAR

– 2013
- 0602 FROM: EPA Region 1 SUBJECT: July

23, 2015 , Presentation on Proposed Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants at Northeast Energy and Commerce Association’s Annual Environmental Conference
**SUMMARY** The Northeast Energy

and Commerce Association held their annual environmental conference on July

23, 2015. Shutsu Wong presented on the Proposed Clean Power Plan for E xisting Power Plants during the Greenhouse Gas Regulatory Panel. **ATTENDEES** See attached. Agenda, attendee list and slides are attached.
Magellan GP, LLC Non-Management Director Compensation Program



 Exhibit 10(c) 
 Magellan GP, LLC 
 Non-Management Director

 Compensation Program 
 Effective January 1, 2010 
  

							
	 	  	Compensation	 	 	 Timing of Payment(1)

	 Annual Board Retainer:(2)
  
         Cash
  
	  	$  
	50,000  
	    
	 	Paid quarterly as of January 1st
, April 1st , July 1st and October 1st
	  
         Common Units
	  	$	70,000	(3) 	 	As of January 1st
			
	 Annual Chairman Retainer:(2)
  
         Audit Committee
  
         Compensation Committee
  
         Conflicts Committee
	  	  
  
 $
  
 $
  
 $
	  
  
 15,000
  
 10,000
  
 10,000
	  
  
   
  
   

  
   
	 	  
  
 Paid quarterly as of January 1st ,
April 1st , July 1st and October 1st

			
	 Meeting Fees:
  
         Board Meeting Fees
  
         Committee Meeting Fees
	  	  
  
 $
  
 $
	  
  
 1,500 per meeting
  
 1,500 per meeting
	  
  
   
  
   

	 	  
  
 Paid quarterly as of January 1st ,
April 1st , July 1st and October 1st


  

	(1)	For newly elected directors or a newly appointed committee chairman, the annual board retainer and annual chairman retainer, if applicable, are payable pro-rata for the
year of election. 

  

	(2)	Directors who resign from the board or relinquish their role of committee chairman after a payment date has occurred, but prior to the payment having been received,
will receive a pro-rata annual board retainer and annual chairman retainer for the period of time between the payment date and the resignation/relinquishment. 

  

	(3)	 The number of common units to be issued for the annual board retainer will be determined based on the closing price on the first business day
immediately following the January 1st payment date.
#### PEOPLE ex rel. BUCKLAND v. WALDO,

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First De*1138partment.

January 15, 1915.)

Proceeding by the People of the State of New York, on the relation of Ernest E. Buckland, against Rhine-lander Waldo, as Commissioner.

No opinion. Motion granted, with $10 costs. Order filed.
IV 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 309

Expressing the importance of immediately reopening the famous Beartooth 

All-American Highway from Red Lodge, Montana, to Yellowstone National Park in Wyoming. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 8, 2005

Mr. POMBO submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Resources, and in addition to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, for a period to be subsequently determined by 

the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

RESOLUTION

Expressing the importance of immediately reopening the famous Beartooth All-American Highway from Red Lodge, 

Montana, to Yellowstone National Park in Wyoming.

Whereas on March 1, 1872, Yellowstone was established as 

the world’s first national park; 

Whereas Yellowstone National Park encompasses over 2 million acres and is one of America’s Crown Jewels of the 

National Park System; 

Whereas over 2.8 million people visit Yellowstone National 

Park annually to admire its world famous geysers, hot 

springs, and remarkable wildlife, and to hike its more 

than 950 miles of backcountry trails; 
2

•HRES 309 IH 

Whereas on May 16–17, 2005, a major mudslide bisected the 

scenic Beartooth Highway in 6 sections requiring visitors 

from Montana to undertake a detour to the Northeast 

Entrance to Yellowstone National Park; 

Whereas the scenic Beartooth Highway provides on average 

190,000 visitors annually easy access to the Northeast 

Entrance to Yellowstone National Park; 

Whereas the scenic Beartooth Highway has been recognized 

as one of the most scenic drives in the United States; and 

Whereas the scenic Beartooth Highway is the economic artery for the citizens of the gateway communities of Red 

Lodge, Cooke City, and Silver Gate, Montana: Now, 

therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

2 (1) recognizes the critical importance of ensur3 ing unfettered access to visitors of Yellowstone Na4 tional Park and preserving the economy of Red 

5 Lodge, Montana; and 

6 (2) urges the President to take, without hesi7 tation, all necessary actions to assist the Governor 

8 of Montana in reopening, as quickly as possible, the 

9 scenic Beartooth Highway that provides access to 

10 Yellowstone National Park.

Æ
#### § 52.13 Relationship to other subparts.

This subpart applies when any person who may apply for a construction permit under 10 CFR part 50, or for a combined license under this part seeks an early site permit from the Commission separately from an application for a construction permit or a combined license.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 242 (Friday, December 17, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 78999]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-31778]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Disease, Disability, and Injury Prevention and Control Special 
Emphasis Panel (SEP): Centers for Autism and Developmental Disabilities 
Research and Epidemiology (CADDRE), Funding Opportunity Announcement 
(FOA) DD11-002, Initial Review

    In accordance with Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention (CDC) announces the aforementioned meeting:

    Time and Date: 10 a.m.-5 p.m., March 10, 2011 (Closed).
    Place: Teleconference.
    Status: The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance 
with provisions set forth in Section 552b(c)(4) and (6), Title 5 
U.S.C., and the Determination of the Director, Management Analysis 
and Services Office, CDC, pursuant to Public Law 92-463.
    Matters To Be Discussed: The meeting will include the initial 
review, discussion, and evaluation of ``Centers for Autism and 
Developmental Disabilities Research and Epidemiology (CADDRE), FOA 
DD11-002.''
    Contact Person for More Information: Donald Blackman, PhD, 
Scientific Review Officer, Extramural Research Program Office, 
National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, 
CDC, 4770 Buford Highway, NE., Mailstop K-92, Atlanta, Georgia 
30341, Telephone: (770) 488-3023, e-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#eda9afb4daad8e898ec38a829b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d89c9a81ef98bbbcbbf6bfb7ae">[email protected]</span></a>.
    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been 
delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices pertaining 
to announcements of meetings and other committee management 
activities, for both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 
and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.

    Dated: December 13, 2010.
Elaine L. Baker,
Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2010-31778 Filed 12-16-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Riverbay Corporation, Appellant, v. George Klinghoffer et al., Respondents.

Order entered August 22, 1969, unanimously reversed on the law without costs and without disbursements, and summary judgment granted in plaintiff’s favor enjoining defendants from harboring a dog in their apartment. Plaintiff is the owner of a housing project in Bronx County known as Co-Op City. When completed, it is expected to house approximately 60,000 persons. Defendants moved into an apartment in Co-Op City on May 1, 1969. In violation of specific provisions contained in four separate agreements signed by them forbidding their harboring of dogs, defendants brought a dog with them at the time they moved in. In this action for an injunction, Special Term denied plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, holding that acceptance of rent from defendants while keeping a dog in their apartment created an issue of waiver of plaintiff’s rights under the various written agreements. On May 2, 1969, the day after moving in with the dog, defendants were orally advised they could not keep the dog in their apartment. Three days later a written demand to remove the dog was made. On May 28, 1969, this action was commenced. Upon the record, no triable issue is raised. A prohibition against the keeping of animals by residents of apartment houses is reasonable and enforceable. (See *Knolls Coop. Section No. II*v. *Cashman,*N. Y. L. J., March 5, 1963, p. 17, col. 3, affd. 19 A D 2d 789, affd. 14 N Y 2d 579; *Brigham Park Coop. Apts., Section 2*v. *Krauss,*21 N Y 2d 941.) The acceptance of the May rent did not constitute a waiver of plaintiff’s right to enforce its prohibition against dogs. In *Knolls Coop, (supra)*rent had been collected during a period of nine months with knowledge of the presence of the dog and without objection. Special Term granted plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment. This Appellate Division and the Court of Appeals affirmed. Furthermore, the Occupancy Agreement in *the*instant case, provides: *“*The receipt by the Cooperative of carrying charges [rent] with knowledge of the breach of any covenant of this Agreement shall not be deemed a waiver of such breach.” Clearly plaintiff has done nothing inconsistent with its initial unequivocal position that harboring of the dog will not be permitted and it is entitled to the relief sought. Concur — Eager, J. P., Capozzoli, McGivern, Nunez and McNally, JJ.
#### REES et al., Respondents, v. TRINITY PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

January 29, 1915.)

Action by Glen H. Rees and another against the Trinity Presbyterian Church.

No opinion. Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on November 29, 2010, pursuant to Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), National Shipbuilding Research Program (“NSRP”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership status. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Atlantic Marine Holding Company, Jacksonville, FL, has been removed as a party to this venture. Additionally, BAE Systems Southeast Shipyards AMHC, Inc., Jacksonville, FL, has been added to this venture.                

No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and NSRP intends to file additional written notification disclosing all changes in membership.

                    On March 13, 1998, NSRP filed its original notification pursuant to Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on January 29, 1999 (64 FR 4708).                

                    The last notification was filed with the Department on September 15, 2010. A notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on October 25, 2010 (75 FR 65511).                

Patricia A. Brink,

Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 2010-31600 Filed 12-16-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4410-11-M
§ 60.43 License specification. ( a ) A license issued under this part shall include license conditions derived from the analyses and evaluations included in the application, including amendments made before a license is issued, together with such additional conditions as the Commission finds appropriate.
( b ) License conditions shall include items in the following categories: ( 1 ) Restrictions as to the physical and chemical form and radioisotopic content of radioactive waste.
( 2 ) Restrictions as to size, shape, and materials and methods of construction of radioactive waste packaging.
( 3 ) Restrictions as to the amount of waste permitted per unit volume of storage space considering the physical characteristics of both the waste and the host rock.
( 4 ) Requirements relating to test, calibration, or inspection to assure that the foregoing restrictions are observed.
( 5 ) Controls to be applied to restricted access and to avoid disturbance to the postclosure controlled area and to areas outside the controlled area where conditions may affect isolation within the controlled area.
( 6 ) Administrative controls, which are the provisions relating to organization and management, procedures, recordkeeping, review and audit, and reporting necessary to assure that activities at the facility are conducted in a safe manner and in conformity with the other license specifications.
[46 FR 13980, Feb. 25, 1981, as amended at 48 FR 28221, June 21, 1983; 61 FR 64268, Dec. 4, 1996]