alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Deborah Klein et al., Appellants, v. Federation Bank & Trust Co., Respondent.

In an action to recover damages resulting from an alleged breach of contract, plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, (1) from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated January 11, 1968, as, upon defendant’s motion, dismissed the complaint as amended by the same order and (2) from a judgment of said court entered January 17, 1968 pursuant to said order. Order and judgment affirmed, with one bill of $10 costs and disbursements. The second cause of action in the amended complaint was dismissed on the theory that it was barred by the doctrine of *res judicata.*In our opinion, this cause of action should have been dismissed for legal insufficiency. As in the prior action instituted by plaintiff Ernest Klein alone (see *Klein*v. *American Trust Co.,*25 A D 2d 564), this cause of action.is insufficient as a matter of law. Christ, Acting P. J., Brennan, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
**HEHS/AIMD-00-289R**                      Published: Aug 21, 2000. Publicly Released: Aug 21, 2000.                  

-   
-   
-   
-   

    Jump To:  
-  Elder Abuse 
-  Services for Older Adults 
-  State and Local-Level Drivers and Trends 
-  State and Local Fiscal Projections 
-  Federal Borrowing 
-  Managing the Debt 
-  Summary of Funding Provisions 
-  Auditing the Government's Books 
-  Unpacking the Financial Report 
-  Highlights 
-  Recommendations 
-  Background 
-  About This Work 
-  About This Work 
-  Trends 
-  About the Center 
-  Why It's High Risk 
-  What Remains To Be Done 
-  Key Reports 
-  Newest COVID-Related Reports 
-  AI Use Cases 
-  Flood Insurance 
-  Past Pandemic-Related Reports 
-  CARES Act Oversight Reports 
-  All COVID-19 Reports 
-  Report Suspected Fraud 
-  Subjects 
-  How to Get Notified 
-  Past Reports 
-  Public Health Threats 
-  Explore the FY 2022 and 2023 Funds 
-  Status of FY22 Projects 
-  Lessons Learned 
-  Agency Reports 
-  Recent Reports 
-  Recommendations 
-  Supplemental Material 
-  Full Report 
-  Additional Data 
-  View Decision 
-  Downloads 
-  Previously Identified Actions 
-  Related Pages 
-  Associated Agencies 
-  Tough Choices and Opportunities Ahead 
-  Americas Fiscal Future Key Areas 
-  Retirement Security Key Areas 
-  Current List 
-  About The High Risk List 
-  Area Ratings 
-  Previous High Risk Products 
-  Search Federal Vacancies 
-  Past Federal Vacancies 
-  Violation Letters 
-  About the Yellow Book 
-  Advisory Council 
-  Related Resources 
-  Comment Letters 
-  Related Publications 
-  Contacts and Resources 
-  Major Issues Facing the Nation 
-  Meeting Strategic Challenges 
-  Additional Resources 
-  Resources 
-  GAO Contacts 
-  Mission Teams 
-  Operations and Staff Offices  
-  Organization Chart  
-  Why a Career at GAO? 
-  Am I Qualified? 
-  Company Culture 
-  Reasonable Accommodations 
-  Video Gallery 
-  Paid Internships 
-  Student Volunteers 
-  Professional Development Program 
-  Advancement 
-  Executive Candidate Program 
-  Summer Associates 
-  Externships 
-  Benefits 
-  Contacts 

Skip to Highlights

## Highlights

Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO responded to congressional questions regarding the May 18th hearing on the uses of social security numbers (SSN), focusing on the following questions: (1) what problems are caused when necessary SSNs are not included on tax forms submitted to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS); and (2) what actions federal agencies are taking in the area of using biometrics to identify individuals.

## Full Report

Full Report (4 pages)

## Office of Public Affairs

### Media Inquiries

Sarah Kaczmarek
kaczmareks@gao.gov

(202) 512-4800

### Public Inquiries

Public Affairs
PublicAffairs@gao.gov

(202) 512-4800

## Topics

Tax Policy and Administration

BiometricsEligibility determinationsEntitlement programsFingerprintsPublic assistance programsSocial security numberTax creditTax returnsTaxpayersSocial security numbers
#### § 603.1120 Award-specific audits.

Guidance on when and how the contracting officer should request additional audits for an expenditure-based TIA is identical to the guidance in 10 CFR 600.316(d). If the contracting officer requires an award-specific examination or audit of a for-profit participant's records related to a TIA, the contracting officer must use the auditor specified in the award terms and conditions, which should be the same auditor who performs periodic audits of the participant.
§ 503.33 Site limitations. ( a ) *Eligibility.* Section 212(a)(1)(B) of the Act provides for a permanent exemption due to site limitations. To qualify for such an exemption, a petitioner must certify that: ( 1 ) One or more specific physical limitations relevant to the location or operation of the proposed facility exist which, despite good faith efforts, cannot reasonably be expected to be overcome within five years after commencement of operations;
( 2 ) No alternate power supply exists, as required under § 503.8 of these regulations;
( 3 ) Use of mixtures is not feasible, as required under § 503.9 of these regulations; and
( 4 ) Alternative sites are not available, as required under § 503.11 of these regulations. Note:
Examples of the types of site limitations to which a petitioner may certify in order to qualify for this exemption include: (i) Inaccessibility of alternate fuels as a result of a specific physical limitation; (ii) Unavailability of transportation facilities for alternate fuels; (iii) Unavailability of adequate land or facilities for handling, using or storing an alternate fuel; (iv) Unavailability of adequate land or facilities for controlling and disposing of wastes, including pollution control equipment or devices necessary to assure compliance with applicable environmental requirements; (v) Unavailability of adequate and reliable supply of water, including water for use in compliance with applicable environmental requirements; or (vi) Other site limitations exist which will not permit the location or operation of the proposed unit using an alternate fuel.
( b ) *Evidence required in support of the petition.* A petitioner must include in the petition the following evidence in order to make the demonstration required by this section: ( 1 ) Duly executed certifications required under paragraph (a) of this section;
( 2 ) Exhibits containing the basis for the certifications required under paragraph (a) of this section (including those factual and analytical materials deemed by the petitioner to be sufficient to support the granting of this exemption);
( 3 ) Environmental impact analysis, as required under § 503.13 of these regulations; and
( 4 ) Fuels search, as required under § 503.14 of these regulations.
[46 FR 59903, Dec. 7, 1981, as amended at 54 FR 52895, Dec. 22, 1989]
##### 



Exhibit 31.2
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) UNDER THE EXCHANGE ACT I, John V. Curci, the Chief Financial Officer of B.H.I.T. Inc., certify that:  1.
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of B.H.I.T. Inc.;  2.
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:  a)
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant is made known to us by others, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andc)
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and  5.
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function):  a)
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data; andb)
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting. Date: May 10, 2005
    By:
    /s/ John V. CurciJohn V. CurciVice-President, Treasurer & Chief Financial OfficerPrincipal Accounting Officer
EXHIBIT 35.2

SERVICERS CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE

Re: Assessment of compliance for services provided pursuant to the Master Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated February 27, 2007, the Series Supplement,
dated January 8, 2013, the US$ Note Trust Deed, dated January 9, 2013, and other transaction documents relating to SMART ABS Series 2013-1US Trust (collectively, the Agreements).

The undersigned hereby certifies that:



| | 1. | I, Alan Cameron, am a Director of Macquarie Securities Management Pty Limited (the Manager).
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | A review of the Managers activities during the period from April 1, 2014 through March 31, 2015 (the Reporting Period), and of its performance under each of the Agreements has been
made under my supervision.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 3. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Manager has fulfilled all of its obligations under each of the Agreements in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                           
|-------------------------------------------
|Date: 24 June 2015                         
|                                           
|/s/ Alan Cameron                           
|Alan Cameron Director                      
|                                           
|Macquarie Securities Management Pty Limited
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

** **

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theaccompanying Quarterly Report of Greene County Bancshares, Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 (the “Report”), I, R. StanPuckett, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  The Reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   | /s/    |  R. Stan Puckett                     |   |
|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |   | R. Stan Puckett                           |
|   |   | Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive |
|   |   | Officer                                   |

 

Date:  August 6, 2004

 

----
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

DERRICK HARVEY,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 480 EAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 2nd day of May, 2022, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 200 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 200

Supporting the goals and ideals of ``National Correctional Officers and 
Employees Week'' and honoring the service of correctional officers and 
                               employees.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 6, 2005

 Mr. Strickland (for himself, Mr. Holden, Mr. Green of Wisconsin, and 
Mr. Sweeney) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                     the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Supporting the goals and ideals of ``National Correctional Officers and 
Employees Week'' and honoring the service of correctional officers and 
                               employees.

Whereas the operation of correctional facilities represents a crucial component 
        of the criminal justice system of the United States;
Whereas correctional personnel play a vital role in protecting the rights of the 
        public to be safeguarded from criminal activity;
Whereas correctional personnel are responsible for the care, custody, and 
        dignity of the human beings charged to their care;
Whereas correctional personnel work under demanding circumstances and face 
        danger in their daily work lives; and
Whereas annually the first week of May is recognized as National Correctional 
        Officers and Employees Week: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) supports the goals and ideals of ``National 
        Correctional Officers and Employees Week''; and
            (2) honors all correctional officers and employees for 
        their service to their communities, States, and the Nation.
                                 <all>
```
#### BARNETT, Respondent, v. BRADLEY CONTRACTING CO., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

February 11, 1915.)

Action by Simon Barnett, as administrator, etc., against the Bradley Contracting Company.

No opinion. Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs.
#### § 602.16 National security.

Activities under the Epidemiology and Other Health Studies Financial Assistance Program are not expected to involve classified information (i.e., Restricted Data, Formerly Restricted Data, National Security Information). However, if in the opinion of the recipient or DOE such involvement becomes expected prior to the closeout of the award, the recipient or DOE shall notify the other in writing immediately. If the recipient believes any information developed or acquired may be classified, the recipient shall not provide the potentially classified information to anyone, including DOE officials with whom the recipient normally communicates, except the Director, Office of Classification, and shall protect such information as if it were classified until notified by DOE that a determination has been made that it does not require such handling. Correspondence that includes the specific information in question shall be sent by registered mail to the U.S. Department of Energy, Attn: Director, Office of Classification, EHSS-60, P.O. Box A, Germantown, MD 20875. If the information is determined to be classified, the recipient may wish to discontinue the project, in which case the recipient and DOE shall terminate the award by mutual agreement. If the award is to be terminated, all material deemed by DOE to be classified shall be forwarded to DOE in a manner specified by DOE for proper disposition. If the recipient and DOE wish to continue the award, even though classified information is involved, the recipient shall be requested to obtain both personnel and facility security clearances through the Office of Headquarters Security Operations awards or from the cognizant field office for awards obtained through DOE field organizations. Costs associated with handling and protecting any such classified information shall be negotiated at the time that the determination to proceed is made.

[60 FR 5841, Jan. 31, 1995, as amended at 71 FR 68730, Nov. 28, 2006; 80 FR 5008, Jan. 30, 2015; 88 FR 41292, June 26, 2023]
#### A. SCHWOERER & SONS, Respondents, v. ROSS, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

December 24, 1914.)

Action by A. Schwoerer & Sons against Sylvester Ross, Jr. H. A. Ingraham, of Brooklyn, for appellant. P. Cohen, of New York City, for respondents.

No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Order filed. See, also, 154 App. Div. 937, 139 N. Y. Supp. 1115.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
 AGENCY: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
 ACTION: Update Listing of Financial Institutions in Liquidation.
 SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (Corporation) has been appointed the sole receiver for the following financial institutions effective as of the Date Closed as indicated in the listing. This list (as updated from time to time in the 
                        **Federal Register**
                        ) may be relied upon as “of record” notice that the Corporation has been appointed receiver for purposes of the statement of policy published in the July 2, 1992 issue of the 
                        **Federal Register**
                         (57 FR 29491). For further information concerning the identification of any institutions which have been placed in liquidation, please visit the Corporation Web site at 
                        *http://www.fdic.gov/​bank/​individual/​failed/​banklist.html*
                         or contact the Manager of Receivership Oversight in the appropriate service center. Dated: December 13, 2010. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. Pamela Johnson, Regulatory Editing Specialist.
 Institutions in Liquidation
[In alphabetical order]
FDIC Ref. No.
Bank name
City
State
Date closed10317
Earthstar Bank
Southampton
PA
12/10/201010318
Paramount Bank
Farmington Hills
MI
12/10/2010


[FR Doc. 2010-32205 Filed 12-22-10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6714-01-P
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-40798

Conference Calendar

 

LANEY J. HARRIS,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

TOGO D. WEST, JR.,

Secretary, Department of the Army,

Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:94-CV-58

- - - - - - - - - -

February 11, 1998

Before SMITH, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Laney J. Harris appeals from the district court’s dismissal

of his civil rights action for failure to effect timely service

of process. He contends that he has shown good cause for his

failure to timely serve the defendant because there was allegedly

no one in the clerk’s office during his many visits there. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, the judgment is AFFIRMED for essentially the reasons
No. 97-40798 

-2-

stated by the district court. See Harris v. West, No. 5:94cv58

(E.D. Tex. June 24, 1997). 

The district court’s judgment does not specify whether the

dismissal of Harris’s civil rights action was with or without

prejudice. The district court’s dismissal therefore operated as

an adjudication on the merits. See Hilliard v. Board of Pardons

& Paroles, 759 F.2d 1190, 1193 (5th Cir. 1985). Accordingly, the

judgment of the district court is MODIFIED to reflect that the

dismissal is without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m).

AFFIRMED; JUDGMENT MODIFIED.
Unassociated Document


    
        

      Exhibit
10.2

       

    

    Corsico,
dated  18 February 2010    

     

     

     

    EXTENSION
OF FIXED TERM EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

     

     

    


    This
extension of the fixed term Employment Agreement (“the Agreement”) in force
between FOSTER WHEELER GLOBAL
E&C SRL (“the
Company”) and Mr.
UMBERTO DELLA SALA (“the Executive”) since
October 1st 2008 is
dated 18 February 2010.

    


    By
executing this extension, the Company and the Executive agree that the Agreement
expiring on December 31st 2011 is
extended to July, 31st 2013,
pursuant to Article 10, Paragraph 4, Law Decree n. 368 of 6 September 2001, as
modified by Law n. 247 of 24 December 2007.

    


    All other
conditions remain unchanged.

    


    It is
agreed that on the expiry date above the Agreement will terminate without any
further communication.

    


    
       

      
        
          
            
              
                
                  
                    
                      	
                              FOSTER WHEELER GLOBAL E&C
      S.R.L.  

                            	
                              THE EXECUTIVE

                            
	 	 
	BY 	 
	 	 
	NAME: Franco
      Baseotto   	NAME: Umberto della
      Sala 
	A Board of Directors’
      Member 	 


                    

                  

                

              

            

          

        

        
           

           

           

           

           

           

           

           

           

           

           

           

           

           

           

           

           

           

           

           

          
            
               

            

            
              
                FOSTER
WHEELER GLOBAL E&C S.R.L.

                Via
S.Caboto 1, 20094 Corsico ( Milano )

                Capitale
Sociale I.V. € 400.000.000 - Codice Fiscale/Partita Iva/Reg. Imprese 05959280966
R.E.A. MI n. 1861716

                Società
soggetta alla direzione e coordinamento della controllante Foster Wheeler Europe
Ltd.