alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FORM 10-Q FOR THE
QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          12,039
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           9,242
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 7,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     65,631
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          59,534
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        335,950
<ALLOWANCE>                                      3,088
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 504,863
<DEPOSITS>                                     420,264
<SHORT-TERM>                                    12,366
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              5,312
<LONG-TERM>                                     15,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        12,915
<OTHER-SE>                                      39,006
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 504,863
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 20,688
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                5,522
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   284
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                26,494
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              11,200
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              11,878
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           14,616
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      302
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 11,255
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,102
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       6,102
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,197
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .83
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .81
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.29
<LOANS-NON>                                        939
<LOANS-PAST>                                       393
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 2,954
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      292
<RECOVERIES>                                       124
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                3,088
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             2,792
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            296


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 441 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 441

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                    September 20, 2005.
Whereas the Space Shuttle Return-to-Flight is the first step in the Nation's 
        Vision for Space Exploration;
Whereas the Space Shuttle Discovery Crew completed three highly successful 
        extra-vehicular activity spacewalks;
Whereas the STS flight 114 accomplished the first in-flight heat shield repairs 
        on the Space Shuttle;
Whereas the Discovery crew delivered more than 6 tons of needed supplies and 
        equipment to the International Space Station;
Whereas Discovery's spacewalkers removed a failed Space Station gyroscope and 
        replaced it with a new one, restoring full capability of the Station's 
        attitude control system;
Whereas the Discovery mission successfully used three different Canadian robotic 
        extensions to conduct spacewalks and to survey the Shuttle: the Shuttle 
        Canadarm; the Space Station Canadarm2; and the Orbiter Boom Sensor 
        System;
Whereas the crew of the Discovery experienced ``virtual'' visits from leaders of 
        2 nations, the President of the United States and the Prime Minister of 
        Japan; and
Whereas Commander Eileen Collins led the crew of 7 and guided the Discovery 
        vehicle through an unprecedented back flip maneuver: Now, therefore, be 
        it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) commends the entire National Aeronautics and Space 
        Administration team and community, who provided invaluable technical 
        support and leadership for the historic mission of Space Shuttle 
        Discovery STS flight 114;
            (2) commends Commander Eileen Collins, for being the first female 
        space shuttle commander and a role model for all;
            (3) commends Col. Jim Kelly, pilot of STS 114, for his second flight 
        aboard the Space Shuttle and his participation in robotic arm 
        operations;
            (4) commends Charlie Camarda, mission specialist, a ``rookie'' who 
        performed like a veteran by transferring the multipurpose logistics 
        module from the International Space Station to the Space Shuttle;
            (5) commends Wendy Lawrence, mission specialist, for outstanding 
        skill in operating Canadarm2;
            (6) commends Soichi Noguchi of Japan, mission specialist, a 
        ``rookie'' who was a ``spacewalker'' for the inspections and repairs of 
        the Space Shuttle;
            (7) commends Steve Robinson, mission specialist, for his outstanding 
        skill as a ``spacewalker,'' who enhanced and repaired Discovery and the 
        International Space Station; and
            (8) commends Andy Thomas, mission specialist, who performed the 
        laser checks on the leading edge of the Space Shuttle by the operation 
        of Canadarm2.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
#### Mandus DeMay, Administrator of Estate of Harold DeMay, Deceased, Appellee, v. Robert Brew and John C. Brew, Appellants.

Gen. No. 9,566.

*506opinion filed September 19, 1940.

Thomas J. Welch and Vera M. Binks, for appellants; Charles F. Short, Jr., of counsel; Bergland & Everett, for appellee.

Opinion by

Justice Dove.

“Not to be published in full.’’
#### In the Matter of Equitable Federal Savings and Loan Association of New York, Appellant, v. Frank Wille, as Superintendent of Banks of the State of New York, et al., Respondents. In the Matter of Equitable Federal Savings and Loan Association of New York, Appellant, v. Frank Wille, as Superintendent of Banks of the State of New York, et al., Respondents.

Judgments dismissing petitions entered December 4, 1969, and January 30, 1970, unanimously affirmed, with one bill of $50 costs and disbursements to respondents. The dismissal of the petitions herein is upon the ground that the petitions failed to allege any facts that would show the determinations of respon*756dent Superintendent of Banks to have been arbitrary or capricious. We have considered the petitions on the merits and do not pass upon the question of whether petitioner has standing to question the approval of respondent. In that connection the affirmance by this court without opinion (20 A D 2d 682) of *Matter of Franklin Nat. Bank*v. *Superintendent of Banks*(40 Mise 2d 565) does not necessarily indorse the Special Term holding that the petitioners there had no standing. Concur — Eager, J. P., Capozzoli, Nunez and Steuer, JJ.
Order entered October 21 , 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 14

- 00562

- CR

TODD ALLEN REICH, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 199th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas Trial Cou rt Cause No. 199

- 80306

- 2013



### O RDER

On August 15, 2014, the Court granted court reporter Janet Dugger a sixty

- day extension
of time to file the reporter’s record. To date, the record has not been filed.
Accordingly, we ORDER the trial court to make findin gs of fact regarding why the
reporter’s record has not been filed.

 The trial court shall first determine whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal. If the trial court determines that appellant does not desire to prosecute the appeal, it shall make a finding to that effect.

 If the trial court determines that appellant desires to prosecute the appeal, it shall next determine whether appellant is indigent and entitled to proceed without payment of costs for the reporter’s record. If appellant is ent itled to proceed without payment of costs, the trial court shall make a finding to that effect. Moreover, if appellant is indigent, the trial court is ORDERED to take such measures as may be necessary to assure effective representation, which may include appointment of new counsel. If the trial court findsappellant is not indigent, it shall determine whether retained counsel has abandoned the

appeal.

 The trial court shall next determine: (1) the name and address of each court reporter who recorded the proceedings in this cause; (2) the court reporter’s explanation for the delay in filing the reporter’s record; and (3) the earliest date by which the reporter’s record can be filed.

We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record, containing the written fi ndings of fact,
any supporting documentation, and any orders, to this Court within THIRTY DAYS of the date

of this order.
The appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with this order. The appeal
shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are received,

whichever is earlier.

/s/ ADA BROWN JUSTICE
§ 1044.02 Who must follow the requirements contained in this part? The requirements apply to you if you are: ( a ) An employee of DOE, including the National Nuclear Security Administration, or one of its contractors;
( b ) Engaged in DOE defense activities; and
( c ) Wish to make a protected disclosure as described in § 1044.04 of this part.
§ 473.30 Standards and criteria. Research and development to be performed under a grant, under a cooperative agreement, under a contract, as a DOE project, or as an agency project under the Act may be certified under these regulations only if the research and development to be conducted— ( a ) Supplements the automotive propulsion system research and development efforts of industry or any other private researcher;
( b ) Is not duplicative of efforts previously abandoned by private researchers unless there has been an intervening technological advance, promising conceptual innovation, or justified by other special consideration;
( c ) Would not be performed during the annual funding period but for the availability of the Federal funding being sought;
( d ) Is likely to produce an advanced automobile propulsion system suitable for steps toward technology transfer to mass production in a shorter time period than would otherwise occur;
( e ) Is not technologically the same as efforts by any person conducted previously or to be conducted during the annual funding period regarding a substantially similar advanced automobile propulsion system; and
( f ) Is not likely to result in a decrease in the level of private resources expended on advanced automotive research and development by substituting Federal funds without justification.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Bruno Nesci, Appellant.

[815 NYS2d 481]

Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated June 2, 1997 *(People v Nesci,*240 AD2d 437 [1997]), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered August 3, 1995.

Ordered that the application is denied.

The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of appellate counsel *(see Jones v Barnes,*463 US 745 [1983]; *People v Stultz,*2 NY3d 277 [2004]). Prudenti, P.J., Florio, Miller and Ritter, JJ., concur.
#### § 603.1260 Expenditure-based award.

A Federal Government assistance award for which the amounts of interim payments or the total amount ultimately paid (*i.e.*, the sum of interim payments and final payment) are subject to redetermination or adjustment, based on the amounts expended by the recipient in carrying out the purposes for which the award was made, as long as the redetermination or adjustment does not exceed the total Government funds obligated to the award. Most Federal Government grants and cooperative agreements are expenditure-based awards.
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 173 (Thursday, September 6, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 54944]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-21970]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8015]

Designation of the Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist) as a 
Specially Designated Global Terrorist; In the Matter of the Designation 
of The Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist) Also Known as United 
Revolutionary People's Council Also Known as People's Liberation Army 
of Nepal Also Known as CPN(M) as a Specially Designated Global 
Terrorist Pursuant to Section 1(b) of Executive Order 13224, as Amended

    Acting under the authority of Section 1(b) of Executive Order 13224 
of September 23, 2001, as amended (``the Order''), I hereby revoke the 
designation of the entity known as the Communist Party of Nepal 
(Maoist), also known as United Revolutionary People's Council, also 
known as People's Liberation Army of Nepal, also known as CPN(M), as a 
Specially Designated Global Terrorist pursuant to Section 1(b) of the 
Order.
    This notice shall be published in the Federal Register.

    Dated: August 28, 2012.
Wendy R. Sherman,
Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2012-21970 Filed 9-5-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-10-P
```
§ 504.7 Prohibition against excessive use of petroleum or natural gas in mixtures—electing powerplants. ( a ) In the case of electing powerplants, if OFP finds that it is technically and financially feasible for a unit to use a mixture of petroleum or natural gas and an alternate fuel as its primary energy source, OFP may prohibit, by order, the use in that unit of petroleum or natural gas, or both, in amounts exceeding the minimum amount necessary to maintain reliability of operation consistent with maintaining reasonable fuel efficiency of the mixture.
( b ) In making the technical feasibility finding required by former section 301 (b) and (c) of the Act and paragraph (a) of this section, OFP may weigh “physical modification” or “derating of the unit,” but these considerations, by themselves, will not control the technical feasibility finding. A technical feasibility finding might be made notwithstanding the need for substantial physical modification. The economic consequences of a substantial physical modification are taken into account in determining financial feasibility.
(Energy Supply and Environmental Coordination Act of 1974, Pub. L. 93-319, as amended by Pub. L. 94-163, Pub. L. 95-70, and 15 U.S.C. 719 *et seq.;* Department of Energy Organization Act, Pub. L. 95-91, 91 Stat. 565 (42 U.S.C. 7101 *et seq.*); Powerplant and Industrial Fuel Use Act of 1978, Pub. L. 95-620, 92 Stat. 3269 (42 U.S.C. 8301 *et seq.*); Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1981 (Pub. L. 97-35); E.O. 12009, 42 FR 46267, Sept. 15, 1977)
[47 FR 17045, Apr. 21, 1982, and 47 FR 50850, Nov. 10, 1982]
#### Dillard *v.*Holtzendorf.

May 14, 1913.

Complaint. Before Judge Conyers. Glynn superior court. July 27, 1912.

*Hatton Lovejoy*and *Bolling Whitfield,*for plaintiff.

*J. D. Sparlcs,*for defendant.

Evans, P. J.

1. A plea of non est factum may be established by circumstantial as well as direct testimony. Where the payee and maker of a note are brothers, and the suit is by the former against the administrator of the latter, and it is admitted that the maker did not sign the note, but that the payee signed the name of the maker, and where it is contended by the payee that the maker acknowledged its execution in the presence of the payee’s son-in-law, and that the consideration of the note was medical attention given to the maker by the payee, a physician, while his brother was' on a visit to him, it is competent to show that the value of the medical service alleged to have been rendered was grossly disproportionate to the amount of the note, as one of the circumstances tending to show that the maker, who was literate and not shown to have been incapacitated' from signing his name, did not authorize or acknowledge the execution of the note. Testimony that physicians in the locality of the venue of the suit were accustomed to charge certain fees for visits to patients was not inadmissible on the ground that such testimony was irrelevant and immaterial; no point being made that it did not appear that the charges in the two localities were similar.

2. The evidence was sufficient to sustain the verdict.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
#### Lancaster *v.*Johns.

June 17, 1913.

Cancellation of deed. Before Judge Martin. Dodge superior court. March 6, 1912.

*Roberts & Smith*and *Wooten & Griffin,*for plaintiff in error.

*W. M. Clements*and *J. A. Neese,*contra.

Hill, J.

While some • of the evidence admitted over objection was of doubtful materiality, it was not of such a character as to require a new trial. There were no reversible errors of law committed on the trial, and the evidence supported the verdict.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
Editorial Note on Part 37
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 37 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

§ 37.53 Requirements for mobile devices. Each licensee that possesses mobile devices containing category 1 or category 2 quantities of radioactive material must: ( a ) Have two independent physical controls that form tangible barriers to secure the material from unauthorized removal when the device is not under direct control and constant surveillance by the licensee; and
( b ) For devices in or on a vehicle or trailer, unless the health and safety requirements for a site prohibit the disabling of the vehicle, the licensee shall utilize a method to disable the vehicle or trailer when not under direct control and constant surveillance by the licensee. Licensees shall not rely on the removal of an ignition key to meet this requirement.
H. Res. 484

In the House of Representatives, U.S., 

October 25, 2005.

Whereas preventing young people from running away and 

supporting homeless youth and youth in other high-risk 

situations is a family, community, and national concern; 

Whereas the prevalence of runaway and homeless youth in 

the Nation is staggering, with studies suggesting that between 1,600,000 and 2,800,000 young people live on the 

streets of the United States each year; 

Whereas running away from home is widespread, with 1 out 

of every 7 children in the United States running away before the age of 18; 

Whereas youth that end up on the streets or in emergency 

shelters are often those who have been thrown out of 

their homes by their families; who have been physically, 

sexually, or emotionally abused at home; who have been 

discharged by State custodial systems without adequate 

transition plans; who have lost their parents through 

death or divorce; and who are too poor to secure their 

own basic needs; 

Whereas providers of services to runaway and homeless youth 

are experiencing increased demand for services due to the 

displacement of youth and families in the aftermath of 

Hurricanes Katrina and Rita; 
2

•HRES 484 EH 

Whereas the commemoration of National Runaway Prevention Month will encourage all sectors of society to develop 

community-based solutions to prevent runaway and 

homeless episodes among the Nation’s youth; 

Whereas effective programs that support runaway and homeless youth and assist young people in remaining at home 

succeed because of partnerships created among families, 

community-based human service agencies, law enforcement agencies, schools, faith-based organizations, and 

businesses; 

Whereas the future well-being of the Nation is dependent on 

the value placed on young people and the opportunities 

provided for youth to acquire the knowledge, skills, and 

abilities necessary to develop into safe, healthy, and productive adults; 

Whereas Congress supports an array of community-based 

support services that address the critical needs of runaway and homeless youth, including family strengthening, 

street outreach, emergency shelter, and transitional living 

programs; 

Whereas Congress supports programs that provide crisis 

intervention and referrals to reconnect runaway and 

homeless youth to their families and to link young people 

to local resources that provide positive alternatives to 

running away; and 

Whereas the purpose of National Runaway Prevention Month 

in November 2005 is to increase public awareness of the 

life circumstances of youth in high-risk situations and the 

need for safe and productive alternatives, resources, and 

supports for youth, their families, and their communities: 

Now, therefore, be it
3

•HRES 484 EH 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives supports efforts to promote greater public awareness of effective runaway youth prevention programs and the need for safe and 

productive alternatives, resources, and supports for homeless 

youth and youth in other high-risk situations.

Attest:

Clerk.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of  AccuPoll  Holding  Corp.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-Q for the fiscal  quarter  ended  March 31, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, Diana Dimadi, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

May 16, 2005                                        /s/ Diana Dimadi
                                                    ----------------------------
                                                    Diana Dimadi
                                                    Chief Financial Officer

A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
required by Section 906,  has been  provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission or its
staff upon request.