alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           1,211
<SECURITIES>                                    33,052
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                36,030
<PP&E>                                          28,922
<DEPRECIATION>                                (14,162)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  53,594
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           23,969
<BONDS>                                          2,200
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        400
<COMMON>                                            26
<OTHER-SE>                                      25,636
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    53,594
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   138
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   10,733
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (568)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 129
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (10,156)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (10,156)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (10,156)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.44)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.44)


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the amended Quarterly Report of AccuPoll Holding Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Dennis Vadura, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


May 20, 2005                                       /s/ Dennis Vadura
                                                    ---------------------------
                                                         Dennis Vadura
                                                         Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
Exhibit
32





Certification
Pursuant to 18. U.S.C. Section 1350,


As
Adopted Pursuant to


Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In
connection with the quarterly report of Banyan Rail Services Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2010(the “Report”)
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Gary O.
Marino, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Larry
Forman, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of § 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/ Gary O.
Marino





Gary O.
Marino


Chairman
and Chief Executive Officer








/s/ Larry
Forman





Larry
Forman


Vice
President and


Chief
Financial Officer








November
15, 2010
ex10-40.htm


    Exhibit 10.40

    


    Amendment
to

    Employment
Agreement

    


    This Amendment is made effective as of
November 16, 2009 by and between First Solar, Inc. a Delaware corporation having
its principal office at 350 West Washington Street, Suite 600, Tempe, Arizona
85281 (hereinafter “Employer”) and Mary Elizabeth Gustafsson (hereinafter
“Employee”)

    


    WITNESSETH:

    


    WHEREAS,
Employer and Employee are party to an Employment Agreement dated as of February
20, 2009 (the “Employment Agreement”);

     

    WHEREAS,
the Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors reviewed the base
salary of certain officers following which Employee’s base salary was increased
effective March 22, 2009;

     

    WHEREAS,
Employer has promoted Employee to a new position effective December 1,
2009;

     

    WHEREAS,
the parties wish to memorialize these action by amending the Employment
Agreement accordingly;

     

    NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the
foregoing premises, and the mutual covenants, terms and conditions set forth
herein, and intending to be legally bound hereby, Employer and Employee hereby
agree that the Employment Agreement is amended as provided herein.

    


    
      	
              1.

            	
              Section
      1.2 of the Employment Agreement is amended, (i) in the first sentence, to
      replace the title “General Counsel” with the title “Executive Vice
      President, General Counsel and Secretary”, (ii) in the second sentence, to
      replace the title of Employee’s supervisor from “Executive Vice President”
      to “Chief Executive Officer”, and (iii) in the third sentence to replace
      the phrase “or the Employer’s Chief Executive Officer” with the phrase “or
      the Employer’s Board of Directors”.

            


    

    


    
      	
              2.

            	
              Section
      2.1 of the Employment Agreement is amended to replace the stated Base
      Salary of “$325,000” with
“$331,792”.

            


    

    


    
      	
              3.

            	
              Except
      as amended above, the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and
      effect.

            


    

    


    


    IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Employer has caused
this Agreement to be executed by one of its duly authorized officers and
Employee has individually executed this Agreement, each intending to be legally
bound, as of the date first above written.

    


    
      	
              EMPLOYER

            	
              EMPLOYEE

            
	
               

               

               

              /s/ Robert J. Gillette

               

              Robert
      J. Gillette

              Chief
      Executive Officer

            	
               

               

               

              /s/ Mary Elizabeth Gustafsson

               

              Mary
      Elizabeth Gustafsson

            
	 
      	 
      
	 
      	
              Date:  2-15-10
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER REGARDING
PERIODIC REPORT FILED PURSUANT TO SECTION 13(A) OR 15(D)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

I, J.D. Nichols, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

To the best of my knowledge and belief, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on August 14, 2002 by NTS-Properties VI, a Maryland Limited Partnership and to which this certification
is appended (the "Periodic Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of NTS-Properties
VI, a Maryland Limited Partnership.

|                                               
|-----------------------------------------------
|                                               
|/s/ J.D. Nichols                               
|                                               
|J.D. Nichols                                   
|General Partner of NTS-Properties Associates VI
|and Chairman of the Board and Sole Director    
|of NTS Capital Corporation                     
|                                               
|
#### Mathilde Friedman et al., Respondents, v. Greyhound Lines, Inc., et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

Order entered December 9, 1968, which

denied defendants’ motion for a protective order pursuant to CPLR 3103 (subd. [a]) to vacate a notice to take the deposition of defendants, Greyhound Lines, Inc., and Alvin Riley Creason, unanimously reversed on the law and the facts and in the exercise of discretion, without costs or disbursements, and the motion granted without prejudice to an application by plaintiffs for. the taking of the testimony of said defendants upon written interrogatories or open commission in California at the option of the plaintiffs, or, if the bus driver is to be a witness or appear at the trial, then, at plaintiff’s option, the examination shall be held here five days before the trial. In the special circumstances of this case, it is appropriate that examination of the appellants should be had in California. The parties shall pay their respective expenses of such an examination, and the expenses so incurred are to be taxed as a disbursement by the party ultimately succeeding in the action. (See *Osborne*v. *Miller,*30 A D 2d 654; *Walborsky*v. *Wolf,*28 A D 2d 1120.) Concur — Stevens, P. J., Eager, Tilzer, Markewich and Steuer, JJ.
Revised PAI-PEPO-P&RIV Preamble

Nick Parsons to: Cortney_Higgins 11/30/2011 10:32 AM

Cc: Penny Lassiter, Andrea Siefers, Mike Thrift, Ann Johnson, Jan Gilbreath

Cortney,

Attached is a redline strikeout and clean version of the preamble with the changes OMB has requested . Please let 

me know if you have any questions.

EO12866_ChemicalRTR2060-AR02Proposal_20111130.docx

EO12866_ChemicalRTR2060-AR02Proposal_20111130 clean.docx
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Integra Bank Corporation (the
"Corporation"), on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Charles A. Caswell, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (3) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
             15(d) of the Securities Exchange act of 1934; and
         (4) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
             material respects, the financial condition and results of
             operations of the Company.

/s/ Charles A. Caswell
----------------------

Charles A. Caswell
Executive Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer
May 13, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Integra Bank Corporation and will be retained by Integra Bank
Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.





                                       32
IV 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 402 

Supporting the goals and ideals of Infant Mortality Awareness Month. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 28, 2005 

Mr. BURGESS (for himself, Mr. PAUL, and Mr. GINGREY) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Government 

Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Supporting the goals and ideals of Infant Mortality 

Awareness Month. 

Whereas infant mortality refers to the death of a baby before 

it reaches its first birthday; 

Whereas the United States ranks 28th among industrialized 

nations in the rate of infant mortality; 

Whereas in the United States, infant mortality increased in 

2002 for the first time in more than four decades; 

Whereas in 2002 the rate reached 7 deaths per 1,000 live 

births, which was the first increase since 1958; 

Whereas the recent increase is a significant and troubling 

public health issue, especially for African American families, Native American families, and Hispanic families; 
2 

•HRES 402 IH 

Whereas the infant mortality rate among African American 

women is more than double that of Caucasian women, according to a report produced by the National Healthy 

Start Association and by a related group supported by 

the health department of Allegheny County, in the State 

of Pennsylvania; 

Whereas the Secretary of Health and Human Services has 

designated 2010 as the year by which certain objectives 

should be met with respect to the health status of the 

people of the United States; 

Whereas such objectives, known as Healthy People 2010, include an objective regarding a decrease in the rate of infant mortality; 

Whereas September 1, 2005, is the beginning of a period of 

several months during which there will be several national observances that relate to the issue of infant mortality, including the observance of October as Sudden Infant Death Awareness Month and November as Prematurity Awareness Month; and 

Whereas it would be appropriate to observe September 2005 

as Infant Mortality Awareness Month: Now, therefore, be 

it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives supports 

2 the goals and ideals of Infant Mortality Awareness Month 

3 in order to— 

4 (1) increase national awareness of infant mor5 tality and its contributing factors; and 

6 (2) facilitate activities that will assist local com7 munities in their efforts to meet the objective, as es-
3 

•HRES 402 IH 

1 tablished by the Secretary of Health and Human 

2 Service in Healthy People 2010, that the rate of in3 fant mortality in the United States be reduced to a 

4 rate of not more than than 4.5 infant deaths per 

5 1,000 births. 

Æ
1546.704 Authority for use of warranties.

The Contracting Officer shall ensure that the use of a warranty clause in a contract has the

concurrence of the Project Officer.

Parent topic: Subpart 1546.7 - Warranties
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 7073 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 7073

 To provide for reconciliation pursuant to title II of the concurrent 
             resolution on the budget for fiscal year 2019.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 19, 2018

 Mr. Byrne (for himself, Mr. Cramer, Mr. Rogers of Alabama, Mr. Brooks 
of Alabama, Mr. Burgess, Mr. Francis Rooney of Florida, Mr. Babin, Mr. 
  Banks of Indiana, Mr. Gosar, Mr. Gaetz, Mr. Norman, Mr. Biggs, Mr. 
 Posey, Mr. Mooney of West Virginia, Mr. DesJarlais, and Mr. Smith of 
    Texas) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Homeland Security

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To provide for reconciliation pursuant to title II of the concurrent 
             resolution on the budget for fiscal year 2019.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``50 Votes for the Wall Act''.

SEC. 2. BORDER WALL AND SECURITY TRUST FUND.

    (a) Establishment of Fund.--There is established a fund, to be 
known as the ``Border Wall and Security Trust Fund'', consisting of 
such amounts as may be appropriated pursuant to subsection (b) to 
construct a wall (including physical barriers and associated detection 
technology, roads, and lighting) along the international border between 
the United States and Mexico by January 19, 2021.
    (b) Appropriation of Amounts.--There is hereby appropriated to the 
Border Wall and Security Trust Fund established under subsection (a), 
out of any money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, such sums 
as the Secretary of Homeland Security may request of the Secretary of 
Treasury on or after October 1, 2018, up to a total of $25,000,000,000, 
to remain available until expended to carry out the purpose described 
in subsection (a).
    (c) Sunset.--The authority provided by this Act shall terminate on 
September 30, 2028, and the unobligated balance of any amounts in the 
Border Wall and Security Trust Fund on such date shall be returned to 
the general fund of the Treasury.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 985.11 Salable oil.

*Salable oil* means that oil which is free to be handled.
#### § 600.305 Debarment and suspension.

Recipients must comply with the nonprocurement debarment and suspension common rule implemented in 2 CFR 180 and 901. This common rule restricts subawards and contracts with certain parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in Federal assistance programs or activities.

[68 FR 50650, Aug. 21, 2003, as amended at 74 FR 44278, Aug. 28, 2009]
§ 501.181 Sanctions. ( a ) *General.* ( 1 ) A violation of any provision of the Act (other than section 402 of FUA), or any rule or order thereunder shall be subject to the penalties and sanctions provided in subtitle C of title VII of FUA.
( 2 ) Each day that any provision of the Act (other than section 402), or any rule or order thereunder is violated constitutes a separate violation within the meaning of the provisions of this section relating to civil penalties.
( b ) *Criminal penalties.* Any person who willfully violates any provision of the Act (other than section 402), or any rule or order thereunder will be subject to a fine of not more than $50,000, or to imprisonment for not more than 1 year, or both, for each violation.
( c ) *Civil Penalties.* ( 1 ) Any person who violates any provisions of the Act (other than section 402) or any rule in this subchapter or order under this subchapter or the Act will be subject to the following civil penalty, which may not exceed $114,630 for each violation: Any person who operates a powerplant or major fuel burning installation under an exemption, during any 12-calendar-month period, in excess of that authorized in such exemption will be assessed a civil penalty of up to $9 for each MCF of natural gas or up to $45 for each barrel of oil used in excess of that authorized in the exemption.
( 2 ) OFE may compromise and settle, and collect civil penalties whenever it considers it to be appropriate or advisable.
( d ) *Corporate personnel.* ( 1 ) If a director, officer, or agent of a corporation willfully authorizes, orders, or performs any act or practice constituting in whole or in part a violation of the Act, or any rule or order thereunder, he will be subject to the penalties specified in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section without regard to any penalties to which the corporation may be subject. He will not, however, be subject to imprisonment under paragraph (b) of this section unless he knew of noncompliance by the corporation, or had received from OFE notice of noncompliance by the corporation.
( 2 ) Purposes of this paragraph: ( i ) *Agent* includes any employee or other person acting on behalf of the corporation on either a temporary or permanent basis; and
( ii ) *Notice of noncompliance* is a final Fuel Use Order issued under § 501.167 of this part.
[46 FR 59889, Dec. 7, 1981, as amended at 62 FR 46183, Sept. 2, 1997; 74 FR 66032, Dec. 14, 2009; 81 FR 41794, June 28, 2016; 81 FR 96352, Dec. 30, 2016; 83 FR 1292, Jan. 11, 2018; 83 FR 66083, Dec. 26, 2018; 85 FR 830, Jan. 8, 2020; 86 FR 2956, Jan. 14, 2021; 87 FR 1064, Jan. 10, 2022; 88 FR 2193, Jan. 13, 2023; 89 FR 1028, Jan. 9, 2024]
§ 205.199F Ex parte communications. ( a ) No person who is not employed or otherwise supervised by the Office of Hearings and Appeals shall submit ex parte communications to the Director or any person employed or otherwise supervised by the Office with respect to any matter involved in Remedial Order or Order of Disallowance proceedings. ( 1 ) Ex parte communications include any ex parte oral or written communications relative to the merits of a Proposed Remedial Order, Interim Remedial Order for Immediate Compliance, or Proposed Order of Disallowance proceeding pending before the Office of Hearings and Appeals. The term shall not, however, include requests for status reports, inquiries as to procedures, or the submission of proprietary or confidential information. Notice that proprietary or confidential submissions have been made shall be given to all persons on the official service list.
( b ) If any communication occurs that violates the provisions of this section, the Office of Hearings and Appeals shall promptly make the substance of the communication available to the public and serve a copy of a written communication or a memorandum summarizing an oral communication to all participants in the affected proceeding. The Office of Hearings and Appeals may also take any other appropriate action to mitigate the adverse impact to any person whose interest may be affected by the ex parte contact.