alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with this Quarterly Report of ImClone Systems Incorporated
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Daniel S. Lynch, Senior Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer, Acting
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
     or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.

                                                  /s/ DANIEL S. LYNCH
                                          --------------------------------------
                                                     Daniel S. Lynch
                                              Acting Chief Executive Officer

August 13, 2003
#### § 603.900 Receipt of final performance report.

The TIA should make receipt of the final report a condition for final payment. If the payments are based on payable milestones, the submission and acceptance of the final report by the Government representative will be incorporated as an event that is a prerequisite for one of the payable milestones.
THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

BERTHA ALLEN, #134004, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CASE NO. 3:06-CV-772-WKW

)

TALLAPOOSA COUNTY JAIL STAFF, )

et al., )

)

Defendants. )

ORDER

On June 1, 2009, the Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation (Doc. # 38) in this

case to which no timely objections have been filed. Upon an independent review of the file

in this case and upon consideration of the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, it is

ORDERED that:

1. The Recommendation (Doc. # 38) of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED;

2. With respect to Plaintiff’s claim regarding the prosecution of her assailant,

Defendants’ motion for summary judgment is GRANTED, as this claim does not implicate

a violation of any constitutionally protected interest;

3. With respect to Plaintiff’s failure-to-protect claim, Defendants’ motion for

summary judgment is GRANTED to the extent that Defendants seek dismissal of this case

due to Plaintiff’s failure to exhaust properly an administrative remedy previously available

to her at the Tallapoosa County Jail;

Case 3:06-cv-00772-WKW-TFM Document 39 Filed 06/30/09 Page 1 of 2
4. Plaintiff’sfailure-to-protect claim is DISMISSED with prejudice in accordance

with the provisions of 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a) for Plaintiff’s failure to exhaust an

administrative remedy available to her during her confinement in the Tallapoosa County Jail;

and

5. This action is DISMISSED with prejudice.

An appropriate judgment will be entered.

DONE this 30th day of June, 2009.

/s/ W. Keith Watkins

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2

Case 3:06-cv-00772-WKW-TFM Document 39 Filed 06/30/09 Page 2 of 2
Searched for **https://www.ssa.gov/multilanguage/Vietname/10096-VI.pdf**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **https://www.ssa.gov/multilanguage/Vietname/10096-VI.pdf**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.
§ 429.27 General service fluorescent lamps. Note 1 to § 429.27 :
Prior to February 17, 2023, certification reports must be submitted as required either in this section or 10 CFR 429.27 as it appears in the 10 CFR parts 200 through 499 edition revised as of January 1, 2022. On or after February 17, 2023, certification reports must be submitted as required in this section.
( a ) *Determination of Represented Value.* Each manufacturer must determine represented values, which include certified ratings, for each basic model by testing, in accordance with the following sampling provisions. ( 1 ) Units to be tested. ( i ) When testing, use a sample comprised of production units. The same sample of units must be tested and used as the basis for representations for rated wattage, average lamp efficacy, color rendering index (CRI), and correlated color temperature (CCT).
( ii ) For each basic model, randomly select and test a sample of sufficient size, but not less than 10 units, to ensure that represented values of average lamp efficacy are less than or equal to the lower of: ( A ) The arithmetic mean of the sample: or,
( B ) The lower 95 percent confidence limit (LCL) of the true mean divided by .97, where:
( 2 ) Any represented values of measures of energy efficiency or energy consumption for all individual models represented by a given basic model must be the same.
( 3 ) Represented values of CCT, CRI and rated wattage must be equal to the arithmetic mean of the sample.
( b ) *Certification reports.* ( 1 ) The requirements of § 429.12 apply to general service fluorescent lamps; and
( 2 ) Pursuant to § 429.12(b)(13), a certification report shall include the following public product-specific information: The testing laboratory's ILAC accreditation body's identification number or other approved identification assigned by the ILAC accreditation body, average lamp efficacy in lumens per watt (lm/W), rated wattage in watts (W), CCT in Kelvin (K), and CRI.
( c ) *Rounding Requirements.* ( 1 ) Round rated wattage to the nearest tenth of a watt.
( 2 ) Round average lamp efficacy to the nearest tenth of a lumen per watt.
( 3 ) Round CCT to the nearest 100 kelvin (K).
( 4 ) Round CRI to the nearest whole number.
[87 FR 53637, Aug. 31, 2022]
Exhibit 32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
 
 I, Leslie J. Kessler, Chief Executive Officer of PureSafe Water Systems, Inc. (the “Registrant”), hereby certify that the Form 10-Q of PureSafe Water Systems, Inc. for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2009 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
 
 Date:  August 13, 2009
/s/ Leslie J. KesslerLeslie J. KesslerPresident and Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 584 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 584

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 752) to amend title XVIII 
 of the Social Security Act to deliver a meaningful benefit and lower 
          prescription drug prices under the Medicare Program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            December 6, 2005

 Mr. Boswell submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                         the Committee on Rules

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 752) to amend title XVIII 
 of the Social Security Act to deliver a meaningful benefit and lower 
          prescription drug prices under the Medicare Program.

    Resolved, That immediately upon the adoption of this resolution the 
House shall without intervention of any point of order consider in the 
House the bill (H.R. 752) to amend title XVIII of the Social Security 
Act to deliver a meaningful benefit and lower prescription drug prices 
under the Medicare Program. The bill shall be considered as read. The 
previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill to final 
passsage without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate on 
the bill equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking 
minority member of the Committee on Energy and Commerce; and (2) one 
motion to recommit.
                                 <all>
```
PGI 217.7103-3 Solicitations for job orders.       (1) Include in the solicitation—          (i) The nature of the work to be performed;          (ii) The date the vessel will be available to the contractor;          (iii) The date the work is to be completed; and          (iv) Whether bulk ammunition is aboard the vessel.          (2) Unless the solicitation states otherwise, offers are to be based on performance at the contractor's site.          (3) Solicitations processed under negotiated acquisition procedures shall require offerors to include a breakdown of the price with reasonable supporting detail in whatever format and detail the contracting officer may request.          (4) Where practicable, afford potential offerors an opportunity to inspect the item needing repair or alteration.    **Parent topic:** PGI 217.7103 Master agreements and job orders.
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-21-00117-CV

FADUMO OSMAN, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS 

PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE 

ESTATE OF YASMIN ABDILLAHI,

DECEASED; AHMED ABDILLAHI AHMED;

AND ANAB AHMED, Appellants

V.

CITY OF FORT WORTH AND 

DALLAS/FORT WORTH INTERNATIONAL 

AIRPORT BOARD, Appellees

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from the 342nd District 

Court

of Tarrant County (342-317281-20)

January 20, 2022

Memorandum Opinion by Chief 

Justice Sudderth

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there 

was no error in the trial court’s orders. It is ordered that the orders of the trial court 

are affirmed. 
It is further ordered that Appellants shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which 

let execution issue.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Bonnie Sudderth

 Chief Justice Bonnie Sudderth
226 So.2d 769

#### Elisha CLOVIS v. HARTFORD ACCIDENT AND INDEMNITY COMPANY et al.

No. 49988.

Oct. 8, 1969.

In re: Elisha Clovis applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Calcasieu. 223 So.2d 178.

Writ refused. Under the facts as found by the Court of Appeal there is no error of law in the judgment.

SUMMERS, J., is of the opinion the writ should he granted.
Exhibit 32.2




CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER




I, Terry R. Lazar, Chief Financial Officer of PureSafe Water Systems, Inc. (the “Registrant”), hereby certify that the Form 10-Q of PureSafe Water Systems, Inc. for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2011 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.





Date:  May 20, 2011
/s/ Terry R. LazarTerry R. LazarChief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 520 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 520

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                      October 28, 2005.
    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider the conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 2744) making 
appropriations for Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration, 
and Related Agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2006, and for 
other purposes. All points of order against the conference report and against 
its consideration are waived. The conference report shall be considered as read.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
§ 490.507 Alternative fueled vehicle credit transfers. ( a ) Any fleet or covered person that is required to acquire alternative fueled vehicles may transfer an alternative fueled vehicle credit to— ( 1 ) A fleet that is required to acquire alternative fueled vehicles; or
( 2 ) A covered person subject to the requirements of this part, if the transferor provides certification to the covered person that the credit represents a vehicle that operates solely on alternative fuel.
( b ) Proof of credit transfer may be on a form provided by DOE, or otherwise in writing, and must include dated signatures of the transferor and transferee. The proof should be received by DOE within 30 days of the transfer date at the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, U.S. Department of Energy, EE-2G, 1000 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20585-0121, or such other address as DOE publishes on its Web site or in the Federal Register.
[79 FR 15906, Mar. 21, 2014]
PGI 250.103-6 Disposition.

(1) When the request for relief is denied or approved below the Secretarial level, submit the

following documents to the appropriate office within 30 days after the close of the month in which

the decision is executed:

(i) Two copies of the memorandum of decision.

(ii) Except for the Army, one copy of the contractual document implementing any decision approving

contractual action.

(iii) One copy of a final record, as described at PGI 250.101-3 .

(2) When a contract adjustment board decision is implemented, the activity that forwarded the case

to the board shall prepare and submit to the board the documents identified in paragraphs (1)(ii)

and (iii) of this section.

Parent topic: PGI 250.103 Contract adjustments.
#### BETTS v. BETTS.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

February 26, 1915.)

Action by Percy De M. Betts against Emma M. Betts.

No opinion. Motion granted, with $10 costs. Order filed. See, also, 151 N. Y. Supp. 1104.
Case 1:06-cr-00197-MEF-CSC Document 9 Filed 09/22/2006 Page 1 of 1
1807.7201 Definitions.       *Class of contracts* means a grouping of acquisitions, either by dollar value or by the nature of supplies and services to be acquired.          *Contract opportunity* means planned new contract awards exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT).    **Parent topic:** Subpart 1807.72—Acquisition Forecasting
(June 16, 1970)

#### In the Matter of Melville J. Howe et al., Respondents, v. Thomas H. Watkins, Jr., Appellant, and Henry E. Bostic et al., Respondents.

In a proceeding to invalidate petitions designating appellant as a candidate in the Democratic Party Primary Election to be held on June 23, 1970, for nomination for the public office of Member of the Assembly for the 56th Assembly District, Kings County, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered June 16, 1970, which granted the application and invalidated said petitions. Judgment affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Christ, P. J., Rabin, Hopkins, Brennan and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Patrick Joy, Appellant.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Chenango County, rendered October 22,1979, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of possession of a forged instrument in the second degree. On January 3, 1978, defendant was indicted for criminal possession of a forged instrument in the second degree and criminal possession of a forged instrument in the third degree. Prior to trial, defendant left the State and was not apprehended until July, 1979. In the interim, he was indicted for bail jumping in the first degree. On his return to this State, the court appointed an attorney to represent him. Thereafter, defendant entered a plea of guilty to the first count in the January 3, 1978 indictment. The second count of that indictment and the indictment *952charging bail jumping were dismissed. Subsequently, the court refused to permit defendant to withdraw his guilty plea. Pursuant to a plea bargain agreement, defendant, as a second felony offender, received the minimum sentence of two to four years. On this appeal, defendant urges reversal on two grounds. He contends that there was a conflict of interest between him and the Assistant District Attorney who prosecuted the case. He also contends that he was inadequatly represented by assigned counsel. The basis of defendant’s first contention is that prior to the instant indictment both the District Attorney and one of his assistants had represented defendant in prior criminal matters. The assistant represented him in the matter resulting in a conviction that formed the basis of defendant being sentenced as a second felony offender. He is not the assistant who prosecuted the present indictment. We are of the opinion that the circumstances do not require a reversal (cf. *People v Shinkle,*73 AD2d 764; *People v Washington,*52 AD2d 984). Initially, we note that no motion was made to disqualify the assistant nor was there any contention made prior to this appeal that there was a conflict of interest. Neither of the matters in which the District Attorney or his assistant represented defendant have any connection with the present indictment. Furthermore, the defendant has failed to establish any prejudice to his case (cf. *People v Cruz,*60 AD2d 872). The cases he relies upon are clearly distinguishable. We also reject defendant’s contention that he was inadequately represented by counsel. The record clearly demonstrates that defendant understood the charges he was facing and knowingly entered his guilty plea after a plea bargain agreement. He received the minimum sentence as a second felony offender and the second count for possession of a forged instrument together with the bail jumping indictment were dismissed. Considering the record in its entirety, the court properly denied the motion to permit defendant to withdraw his plea of guilty and the judgment should be affirmed. Judgment affirmed. Sweeney, J. P., Main, Mikoll, Casey and Herlihy, JJ., concur.
#### NORTHERN BANK OF NEW YORK v. LOWENSTEIN et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

February 19, 1915.)

Action by the Northern Bank of New York against Moses Lowenstein and another.

No opinion. Application denied, with $10 costs. Order signed. See, also, 150 N. Y. Supp. 686.
### Occupancy models to study wildlife

By: Larissa BaileyMichael John Adams

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/fs20053096

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (952 KB pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certification.

  J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Trust 2012-LC9
  Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2012-LC9 (the
  Trust)

  I, Brian Baker, the President and Chief Executive Officer of J.P. Morgan
  Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp., the depositor into the
  above-referenced Trust, certify that:

  1.I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 10-D
    required to be filed in respect of period covered by this report on
    Form 10-K, of the Trust (the Exchange Act Periodic Reports);

  2.Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act Periodic Reports, taken as a
    whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
    to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
    light of the circumstances under which such statements were
    made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

  3.Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
    information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
    covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act Periodic Reports;

  4.Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement(s) required
    in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
    disclosed in the Exchange Act Periodic Reports, the Master Servicer and
    the Special Servicer have fulfilled their obligations under
    the Pooling and Servicing Agreement in all material respects; and

  5.All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
    for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
    assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
    securities required to be included in this report in accordance with
    Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18
    have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise
    disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance
    described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form
    10-K.

    In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
    information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:
    Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association,
    Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association and
    Pentalpha Surveillance LLC.

    Dated:   March 28, 2013


    /s/ Brian Baker
    Signature

    President and Chief Executive Officer
    J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage
    Securities Corp.
    (senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor