alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Buenaventura Rodriguez, Appellant-Respondent, et al., Plaintiff, v Wyckoff Heights Medical Center et al., Respondents-Appellants, and Stephen Hosmer, Respondent, et al., Defendants.

[815 NYS2d 710]

In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice, etc., the plaintiff Buenaventura Rodriguez appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Levine, J.), dated May 20, 2005, as granted the motion of the defendant Stephen Hosmer for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against him, and the defendants Wyckoff Heights Medical Center and “Pat” Ro*886man separately cross-appeal from so much of the same order as denied their respective cross motions for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them.

Ordered that the order is modified, on the law, by deleting the provision thereof granting the motion of the defendant Stephen Hosmer for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against him and substituting therefor a provision denying that motion; as so modified, the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs payable to the plaintiff Buenaventura Rodriguez by the defendants Stephen Hosmer, Wyckoff Heights Medical Center, and “Pat” Roman.

The plaintiff Buenaventura Rodriguez and her husband commenced this medical malpractice action to recover damages for injuries she sustained during childbirth against, inter alia, Wyckoff Heights Medical Center (hereinafter Wyckoff), the attending physician, the defendant Stephen Hosmer, and a certified nurse midwife employed by Wyckoff who was present at the birth, Patricia “Pat” Roman. The evidence adduced during discovery established that Rodriguez was admitted to Wyckoff with contractions after she was examined by Hosmer at approximately 11:00 p.m. on September 5, 2001. At approximately 12:25 a.m. on September 6, 2001, after Roman examined Rodriguez, a second-year OB/GYN resident also examined her and performed an amniotomy to hasten labor. Fifteen minutes later Rodriguez went into active labor.

The second-year OB/GYN resident ultimately delivered the child, with some assistance from Roman, but without the presence of Hosmer. Rodriguez received neither an epidural nor an episiotomy. After the baby’s head was out of the birth canal, complications arose because of a shoulder dystocia problem. With the advice of Roman and the assistance of two nurses, maneuvers were performed to release the fetal shoulders. Rodriguez sustained a large vaginal laceration during the delivery, requiring surgery.

The affirmations submitted by the defendants Hosmer, Wyckoff Heights, and Roman were insufficient to establish a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law to rebut the many allegations of departures from accepted medical practice in the bill of particulars. Crane, J.P., Goldstein, Luciano and Dillon, JJ., concur.
#### § 501.1 Purpose and scope.

Part 501 establishes the procedures to be used in proceedings before DOE under parts 500-508 of this chapter except as otherwise provided.
§ 60.51 License amendment for permanent closure. ( a ) DOE shall submit an application to amend the license prior to permanent closure. The submission shall consist of an update of the license application submitted under §§ 60.21 and 60.22, including: ( 1 ) A description of the program for post-permanent closure monitoring of the geologic repository.
( 2 ) A detailed description of the measures to be employed—such as land use controls, construction of monuments, and preservation of records—to regulate or prevent activities that could impair the long-term isolation of emplaced waste within the geologic repository and to assure that relevant information will be preserved for the use of future generations. As a minimum, such measures shall include: ( i ) Identification of the postclosure controlled area and geologic repository operations area by monuments that have been designed, fabricated, and emplaced to be as permanent as is practicable; and
( ii ) Placement of records in the archives and land record systems of local State, and Federal government agencies, and archives elsewhere in the world, that would be likely to be consulted by potential human intruders—such records to identify the location of the geologic repository operations area, including the underground facility, boreholes and shafts, and the boundaries of the postclosure controlled area, and the nature and hazard of the waste.
( 3 ) Geologic, geophysical, geochemical, hydrologic, and other site data that are obtained during the operational period pertinent to the long-term isolation of emplaced radioactive wastes.
( 4 ) The results of tests, experiments, and any other analyses relating to backfill of excavated areas, shaft sealing, waste interaction with the host rock, and any other tests, experiments, or analyses pertinent to the long-term isolation of emplaced wastes within the geologic repository.
( 5 ) Any substantial revision of plans for permanent closure.
( 6 ) Other information bearing upon permanent closure that was not available at the time a license was issued.
( b ) If necessary, so as to take into account the environmental impact of any substantial changes in the permanent closure activities proposed to be carried out or any significant new information regarding the environmental impacts of such closure, DOE shall also supplement its environmental impact statement and submit such statement, as supplemented, with the application for license amendment.
[46 FR 13980, Feb. 25, 1981, as amended at 48 FR 28221, June 21, 1983; 54 FR 27872, July 3, 1989; 61 FR 64268, Dec. 4, 1996]
#### JARCK v. BAYLIS et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department.

December 17, 1914.)

Master and Servant (§ 70*)—Contract—Performance.

Where plaintiff sued for salary, commission, and expenses alleged to have been earned between May 4th and May 19th, but by his own testimony he neither solicited orders nor made reports after May 8th, he was not entitled to expenses or salary after that date.

[Ed. Note.—For other cases, see Master and Servant, Cent. Dig. §§ 82-86; Dec. Dig. § 70.*]

Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, First District.

Action by Hugo Jarck against George W. Baylis and another. From a Municipal Court judgment in favor of plaintiff, defendants appeal. Reversed, and new trial granted.

Argued November term, 1914, before LEHMAN, DELANY, and WHITAKER, JJ.

Frederick M. Harris, of New York City, for appellants.

Louis Levene, of New York City, for respondent.

*

For other cases see same topic *&*§ number in Dec.' *&*Am. Digs. 1907 to Sate, & Rep’r Indexes

LEHMAN, J.

The plaintiff sues for salary, commissions, and expenses amounting to $68.80, alleged to have been earned between May 4th and May 19th. From his own testimony it appears that he neither solicited orders nor made reports after May 8th, and it is impossible to see why he should be entitled to any expenses or salary after that date. The trial justice has given judgment for $50, which evidently includes some amounts claimed for work after that date. Moreover, even if he were entitled to such payments, it is impossible to find any basis for allowing him the round sum of $50.

The defendant asks that judgment be reduced to $14.89; but I think that, owing to the confused state of the record, the judgment should be reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event. All concur.
Case 2:06-cv-00767-MEF-SRW Document 10 Filed 09/21/2006 Page 1 of 1
#### SCHAFFER v. PRESSURE LIGHTING CO.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

February 19, 1915.)

Action by Max Schaffer against the Pressure Lighting Company.

No opinion. Application denied, with $10 costs. Order signed.
Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. 1350

Pursuant
to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. 1350), as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of KNOT Offshore Partners LP, a Marshall Islands limited
partnership (the Partnership), certifies, to such officers knowledge, that:

The annual report on Form
20-F for the year ended December 31, 2013 of the Partnership (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.



KNOT OFFSHORE PARTNERS LPBy:

/s/ ARILD VIKName:

Arild VikTitle:

Principal Executive Officerand Principal Financial Officer


Date: April 14, 2014
03/1S/201 0 17:0 8 FAX 2024935142 FAA + DMS 0 001/00 2 

•^., -rr.fr. -': ? 

Si/Kvi.'; n l•l•;l3K^lAK^ 2:V-'0i() 

m 

"vr 

NOTICE o r AJ>l>KAl 

FEDERAl. AVTATTON ADMINISTRATION 

Complainan t 

FAA DOCKET N O 

CPO8WPO0I3 

Civil Penally Acbion 

JOH N HUTTON CORPORATION, d/b/ a 

TORA FLIGHT ADVENTURE CLUB 

Responden t DMS NO.FAA-200H-0780 

NOTICE IB HEREBY GIVE M I'tlAr I-Ul-J SiJUAMT r n \ -l C h f? 1 3.ii:-J3 . IHIRESPONDENT , JOII N MUTTO N UORP , Hif.KfiBr AI'J-KAI . ^i rur- nrr..;isiON O F 

JUDL3E RiCMAK'Lj C. GuuL.iwiN . DAit-i j FrriHiiAR Y 2 , 2 0 1 O. BUT Ncjr 

SERVE D O N TH E RESPONDEN T UNTI L FF:.Br-!UAi<Y 23 , ZC\ i Q. 

RtafUNDEN" ! • f i AF'K'rAI.. I ;-i Afn T H Al I A PP E A I.. A B LIT ISSLlES Mfc-WLIN. 

DATED : HaNni,i,.ii,.u, HAWAII : FCTIRUAR Y >j:ii, Z U ^ O 

B Y , 

JOH N H . WLiSEP , JK . 

JriH N Hl.JTTH N CriR P 

P Iv' !• ;-: I ! 5 h N 
03/18/2010 17:08 FAX 2024935142 FAA * DMS [2002/002 

FAJ'L Docket NO . CP08WP0OI3 

(Civiil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federa l Aviation Administratio n 

600 Independenc e Avenue , Si.W. 

Wilbur WriRhtBiiildinK—Suite 2W1000 

Washington , DC 20591 

Attention : Hearin g Docket Clerk, A<.iC-450 

ONECOP Y 

Lisa J. Toscano, Attorne y 

Office of the Region alcrounsei, AWP-7 

Western-Pacifi c Region 

Federa l Aviation Adininlstratioii 

P.O. Box 92007 

Los Angeles, CA 90009-2007 

T h e Honorabl e Richard C. Goodwin 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

US Deparatmcn t of Transportatio n 

1200 New Jerse y Avenue , S.t. 

East Building Groun d Floor, Room E 12-320 

Wa5ihington D-C. 20590 

.<TlERVICE VA'AH rtY ri^MM-.'Il V l i [l|-[?Al . ['.XTTi^'S S I II P llRiniNA I 

PRIORIT Y u a MAI L r u COP Y prcir'iENii b
§ 959.122 Application. ( a ) Applications for a Certificate of Privilege shall be made on forms furnished by the committee. Each application may contain, but need not be limited to, the name and address of the handler; the quantity by grade, size, and quality of the onions to be shipped; the mode of transportation; the consignee; the destination; the purpose for which the onions are to be used; and certification to the United States Department of Agriculture and to the committee as to the truthfulness of the information shown thereon, and any other appropriate information or documents deemed necessary by the committee or its duly authorized agents for the purposes stated in § 959.120.
( b ) The committee may require each handler making shipments of onions for export to include with his application a copy of the Department of Commerce Shippers Export Declaration Form No. 7525-V applicable to such shipment.
#### SALOMON v. MATTHEWS.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

February 26, 1915.)

Action by Walter J. Salomon against Samuel D. Matthews.

No opinion. Application denied, with $10 costs. Order signed.
§ 1044.03 What definitions apply to this part? The following definitions apply to this subpart: *Atomic Energy Act* means the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (42 U.S.C. 2011 *et seq.*
*Classified information* means: ( 1 ) Information classified as Restricted Data or Formerly Restricted Data under the Atomic Energy Act; or
( 2 ) Information that has been determined pursuant to Executive Order 12958 or prior Executive Orders to require protection against unauthorized disclosure and is marked to indicate its classification status when in document form (also referred to as “National Security Information” in 10 CFR Part 1045 or “defense information” in the Atomic Energy Act).
*Contractor* means any industrial, educational, commercial or other entity, grantee or licensee at any tier, including an individual, that has executed an agreement with the Federal Government for the purpose of performing under a contract, license or other agreement.
*Defense activities* means activities of DOE engaged in support of: ( 1 ) The production, testing, sampling, maintenance, repair, modification, assembly, disassembly, utilization, transportation, or retirement of nuclear weapons or components of nuclear weapons;
( 2 ) The production, utilization, or transportation of nuclear material for military applications; or
( 3 ) The safeguarding of activities, equipment, or facilities which support the production of nuclear weapons or nuclear material for nuclear weapons.
*DOE* means the Department of Energy, including the National Nuclear Security Administration.
*Unclassified controlled nuclear information* means unclassified government information prohibited from unauthorized dissemination under section 148 of the Atomic Energy Act and DOE implementing regulations in 10 CFR part 1017.
# AMERICAN AIRLINES

March 1, 2011

Esta Rosenberg George Wellington Chief, U.S. Carrier Chief, Foreign Carrier Division Licensing Division Department of Transportation Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Ave., S.E. 1200 New Jersey Ave., S.E. Washington, D.C. 20590 Washington, D.C. 20590

Re: American Airlines/WestJet Codeshare Application (DOT-OST-2011-0040)____

Dear Ms. Rosenberg and Mr. Wellington:

We have completed our poll of the carrier partiesserved with the American Airlines/WestJet codeshare application of February 28, 2011. There are no objections. Accordingly, we request favorable action on an expedited
basis.

Respectfully submitted,

____________________________ CARL B. NELSON Associate General Counsel American Airlines, Inc. 1101 17th Street, N.W.
Suite 600 Washington, D.C. 20590
(202) 496-5647
carl.nelson@aa.com

cc: Docket Branch
Paul Gretch
Don Hainbach
Service list**CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE**

I hereby certify that I have this day served the foregoing document by email on the following persons:

Delta, Comair sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com

United jeffrey.manley@united.com

Continental dan.weiss@coair.com

US Airways howard.kass@usairways.com

Alaska, Horizon msinick@ssd.com

Virgin America john.varley@virginamerica.com

Air Wisconsin jhill@dlalaw.com

North American, World mlbenge@zsrlaw.com

Colgan, Mesaba, Pinnacle bthunt@pncl.com

TransStates, Compass, GoJet dhayes@transstates.net

Sky West, ASA, ExpressJet gmurphy@crowell.com

Shuttle America, Republic prizzi@hoganlovells.com

________________________________ CARL B. NELSON

March 1, 2011
Case 3:06-cv-00772-WKW-TFM Document 13 Filed 11/15/2006 Page 1 of 3
Case 3:06-cv-00772-WKW-TFM Document 13 Filed 11/15/2006 Page 2 of 3
Case 3:06-cv-00772-WKW-TFM Document 13 Filed 11/15/2006 Page 3 of 3
# Subpart 224.1 - PROTECTION OF INDIVIDUAL PRIVACY

**Parent topic:**Part 224 - PROTECTION OF PRIVACY AND FREEDOM OF INFORMATION

## 224.103 Procedures.

(b)(2) DoD rules and regulations are contained in DoDI 5400.11, DoD Privacy and Civil Liberties Programs; DoD 5400.11-R, Department of Defense Privacy Program; and DoDM 5400.11, DoD Privacy and Civil Liberties Programs: Breach Preparedness and Response Plan.
§ 1021.214 Adjudicatory proceedings. ( a ) This section applies to DOE proposed actions that involve DOE adjudicatory proceedings, excluding judicial or administrative civil or criminal enforcement actions.
( b ) DOE shall complete its NEPA review (if otherwise required by this part) before rendering any final adjudicatory decision. If an EIS is required, the final EIS will normally be completed at the time of or before final staff recommendation, in accordance with 40 CFR 1502.5(c).
( c ) DOE shall include any relevant NEPA documents, public and agency comments (if any) on those documents, and DOE responses to those comments, as part of the administrative record (40 CFR 1505.1(c)).
###### Editorial Note on Part 55

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 55 appear at 80 FR 74980, Dec. 1, 2015.

#### § 55.25 Incapacitation because of disability or illness.

If, during the term of the license, the licensee develops a permanent physical or mental condition that causes the licensee to fail to meet the requirements of § 55.21 of this part, the facility licensee shall notify the Commission, within 30 days of learning of the diagnosis, in accordance with § 50.74(c). For conditions for which a conditional license (as described in § 55.33(b) of this part) is requested, the facility licensee shall provide medical certification on Form NRC 396 to the Commission (as described in § 55.23 of this part).

[60 FR 13617, Mar. 14, 1995]
** **

United States

Securities and ExchangeCommission

Washington, D.C.  20549

 

Form 10-Q

 

(MarkOne)

[X]   Quarterly Report PURSUANT TO Section 13 or15(d) of the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934

 

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008

 

 

[]   Transition Report PURSUANTTO Section 13 or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934

 

For the transition period from _________to _________

 

Commission file number 0-14554

 

 

NATIONAL PROPERTY INVESTORS8 

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

 

 

55 Beattie Place, P.O. Box 1089

Greenville, South Carolina  29602

(Address of principal executive offices)

 

(864) 239-1000

(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

 

Indicateby check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to befiled by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during thepreceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was requiredto file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements forthe past 90 days.  

[X]Yes  [ ] No

 

Indicateby check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, anaccelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reportingcompany.  See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “acceleratedfiler” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

 

Indicateby check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule12b-2 of the Exchange Act). [ ] Yes  [X] No
-88 -86 -84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74

36 38 40 42 44



### ★

▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 500 18 12 06 00 07/17 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 17 Jul 06

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 39.41 N 76.30 WMeters AGL
§ 451.10 Administrative appeals. ( a ) In order to exhaust administrative remedies, an applicant who receives a notice denying an application in whole or in part shall appeal, on or before 45 days from date of the notice issued by the DOE Deciding Official, to the Office of Hearings and Appeals, 1000 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20585, in accordance with the procedures set forth in subpart C of 10 CFR part 1003.
( b ) If an applicant does not appeal under paragraph (a) of this section, the determination of the DOE Deciding Official shall become final for DOE and judicially unreviewable.
( c ) If an applicant appeals on a timely basis under paragraph (a) of this section, the decision and order of the Office of Hearings and Appeals shall be final for DOE.
( d ) If the Office of Hearings and Appeals orders an incentive payment, the DOE Deciding Official shall send a copy of such order to the DOE Finance Office with a request to pay.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 480 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 480

Permitting individuals to be admitted to the Hall of the House in order 
    to obtain footage of the House in session for inclusion in the 
orientation film to be shown to visitors at the Capitol Visitor Center.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 6, 2005

  Mr. Dreier (for himself and Ms. Slaughter) submitted the following 
        resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Rules

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Permitting individuals to be admitted to the Hall of the House in order 
    to obtain footage of the House in session for inclusion in the 
orientation film to be shown to visitors at the Capitol Visitor Center.

    Resolved, That the Speaker, in consultation with the minority 
leader, may designate individuals to be admitted to the Hall of the 
House and the rooms leading thereto in order to obtain film footage of 
the House in session for inclusion in the orientation film to be shown 
to visitors at the Capitol Visitor Center.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 434.102 Compliance.

102.1 A covered building must be designed and constructed consistent with the provisions of subpart D of this part.

102.2 Buildings designed and constructed to meet the alternative requirements of subparts E or F of this part shall be deemed to satisfy the requirements of this part. Such designs shall be certified by a registered architect or engineer stating that the estimated energy cost or energy use for the building as designed is no greater than the energy cost or energy use of a prototype building or reference building as determined pursuant to subparts E or F of this part.
Editorial Note on Part 40
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 40 appear at 79 FR 75740, Dec. 19, 2014.

§ 40.14 Specific exemptions. ( a ) The Commission may, upon application of any interested person or upon its own initiative, grant such exemptions from the requirements of the regulation in this part as it determines are authorized by law and will not endanger life or property or the common defense and security and are otherwise in the public interest.
( b ) [Reserved]
( c ) The Department of Energy is exempt from the requirements of this part to the extent that its activities are subject to the requirements of part 60 or 63 of this chapter.
( d ) Except as specifically provided in part 61 of this chapter any licensee is exempt from the requirements of this part to the extent that its activities are subject to the requirements of part 61 of this chapter.
[37 FR 5747, Mar. 21, 1972, as amended at 39 FR 26279, July 18, 1974; 40 FR 8787, Mar. 3, 1975; 45 FR 65531, Oct. 3, 1980; 46 FR 13979, Feb. 25, 1981; 47 FR 57481, Dec. 27, 1982; 66 FR 55790, Nov. 2, 2001]
#### Elaine Torres, an Infant by Her Mother Rose Torres, et al., Respondents, v. Peter Boyle, Appellant.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, medical expenses, etc., the appeal is from an order of the Supreme •Court, Nassau County, entered April 29, 1969, which granted plaintiffs’ motion to amend their bill of particulars. Order modified, on the law and the facts, ■by adding thereto a provision that plaintiffs’ motion is granted on condition that the infant plaintiff submit to a further physical examination and an oral pretrial examination. As so modified, order affirmed, without costs. The examinations shall proceed at such times and places as shall be fixed in written notices of not less than 10 days, to be given by defendant. In our opinion, Special Term’s refusal to condition the granting of plaintiffs’ motion upon the infant’s submission to the examinations herein provided for was an improvident exercise of discretion. Christ, Acting P. J., Rabin, Benjamin, Munder and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.