alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7318 

To amend the Federal Assets Sale and Transfer Act of 2016 to ensure 

that the Public Buildings Reform Board has adequate time to carry 

out the responsibilities of the Board, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 17, 2018 

Mr. BARLETTA (for himself and Mr. DENHAM) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Assets Sale and Transfer Act of 

2016 to ensure that the Public Buildings Reform Board 

has adequate time to carry out the responsibilities of 

the Board, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. FEDERAL ASSETS SALE. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 4(c)(2) of the Federal As5 sets Sale and Transfer Act of 2016 (40 U.S.C. 1303 note; 

6 Public Law 114–287) is amended— 

7 (1) by striking subparagraph (B); 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7318 IH

1 (2) by striking the paragraph designation and 

2 heading and all that follows through ‘‘In selecting’’ 

3 in subparagraph (A) in the matter preceding clause 

4 (i) and inserting the following: 

5 ‘‘(2) APPOINTMENTS.—In selecting’’; and 

6 (3) by redesignating clauses (i) through (iv) as 

7 subparagraphs (A) through (D), respectively, and in8 denting appropriately. 

9 (b) TERMINATION.—Section 10 of the Federal Assets 

10 Sale and Transfer Act of 2016 (40 U.S.C. 1303 note; 

11 Public Law 114–287) is amended by striking ‘‘the date 

12 of enactment of this Act’’ and inserting ‘‘the date on which 

13 the Board members are appointed pursuant to section 4’’. 

14 (c) ACCOUNTING SYSTEM.—Section 12(e) of the Fed15 eral Assets Sale and Transfer Act of 2016 (40 U.S.C. 

16 1303 note; Public Law 114–287) is amended in the first 

17 sentence by striking ‘‘the date of enactment of this Act’’ 

18 and inserting ‘‘the date on which the Board members are 

19 appointed pursuant to section 4’’. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 113 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 113

   Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Veterans' 
               Affairs in the One Hundred Ninth Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 16, 2005

     Mr. Buyer (for himself and Mr. Evans) submitted the following 
resolution; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Veterans' 
               Affairs in the One Hundred Ninth Congress.

    Resolved,

SECTION 1. AMOUNTS FOR COMMITTEE EXPENSES.

    For the expenses of the Committee on Veterans' Affairs (hereafter 
in this resolution referred to as the ``Committee''), including the 
expenses of all staff salaries, there shall be paid, out of the 
applicable accounts of the House of Representatives for committee 
salaries and expenses, not more than $7,933,081.00 for the One Hundred 
Ninth Congress.

SEC. 2. SESSION LIMITATIONS.

    Of the amount specified in section 1--
            (1) not more than $3,832,415.00 shall be available for 
        expenses incurred during the period beginning at noon on 
        January 3, 2005, and ending immediately before noon on January 
        3, 2006; and
            (2) not more than $4,100,666.00 shall be available for 
        expenses incurred during the period beginning at noon on 
        January 3, 2006, and ending immediately before noon on January 
        3, 2007.

SEC. 3. VOUCHERS.

    Payments under this resolution shall be made on vouchers authorized 
by the Committee, signed by the Chairman of the Committee, and approved 
in the manner directed by the Committee on House Administration.

SEC. 4. REGULATIONS.

    Amounts made available under this resolution shall be expended in 
accordance with regulations prescribed by the Committee on House 
Administration.
                                 <all>
```
120 STAT. 2672 PUBLIC LAW 109–381—DEC. 1, 2006

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S. 1140:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD:

Vol. 151 (2005): June 15, considered and passed Senate.

Vol. 152 (2006): Nov. 13, considered and passed House.

Æ

Public Law 109–381

109th Congress

An Act

To designate the State Route 1 Bridge in the State of Delaware as the ‘‘Senator

William V. Roth, Jr. Bridge’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF SENATOR WILLIAM V. ROTH, JR. BRIDGE.

The State Route 1 Bridge over the Chesapeake and Delaware

Canal in the State of Delaware is designated as the ‘‘Senator

William V. Roth, Jr. Bridge’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law (including regulations), map, document,

paper, or other record of the United States to the bridge described

in section 1 shall be considered to be a reference to the Senator

William V. Roth, Jr. Bridge.

Approved December 1, 2006.

Dec. 1, 2006

[S. 1140]
Sanitized – Attachment 019 

Page 1 of 1
`[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 559 Reported in House (RH)]







                                                 House Calendar No. 121
109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 559

                          [Report No. 109-302]

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
 bill (H.R. 3010) making appropriations for the Departments of Labor, 
Health and Human Services, and Education, and Related Agencies for the 
     fiscal year ending September 30, 2006, and for other purposes.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

            November 17 (legislative day, November 16), 2005

   Mrs. Capito, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION


 
Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
 bill (H.R. 3010) making appropriations for the Departments of Labor, 
Health and Human Services, and Education, and Related Agencies for the 
     fiscal year ending September 30, 2006, and for other purposes.

    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order to consider the conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 
3010) making appropriations for the Departments of Labor, Health and 
Human Services, and Education, and Related Agencies for the fiscal year 
ending September 30, 2006, and for other purposes. All points of order 
against the conference report and against its consideration are waived. 
The conference report shall be considered as read.
                                                 House Calendar No. 121

109th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                              H. RES. 559

                          [Report No. 109-302]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
 bill (H.R. 3010) making appropriations for the Departments of Labor, 
Health and Human Services, and Education, and Related Agencies for the 
     fiscal year ending September 30, 2006, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

            November 17 (legislative day, November 16), 2005

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed`
#### RUPP v. STEINER et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

November 27, 1914.)

Action by William Rupp against Henry Steiner and others.

No opinion. Motion denied, with $10 costs. Order filed. See, also, 149 N. Y. Supp. 1108.
### Kentucky Energy and Environment Cabinet

Kentucky Division for Air Quality



# -------------------------------------------

Appendix M VISTAS Modeling Reports[This page intentionally left blank.]

### Introduction

The regional haze modeling was coordinated by th e Southeast Regional Planning Organization, Visibility Improvement State a nd Tribal Association of the Southeast (VISTAS), which is comprised of the ten Southeast States (Alabama , Florida, Georgia, Ke ntucky, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, Virginia and West Virginia) and the local programs and tribal agencies located within these states. VI STAS contracted with E nviron International Corp, Alpine Geophysics, LLC and the University of Ca lifornia Riverside to perform the emissions and air quality modeling for this regional haze state and tribal implementation plans. This appendix contains several modeling reports produced by the contractors in support of these regional haze plans for the VISTAS states.

Appendix M.1 contains the preliminary draft of the Technical Support Document for VISTAS

Emissions a nd Air Quality Modeling to Suppor t Regional Haze State Implementation Plans , as submitted by the VISTAS contractors. The docu ment contains information on the development of the emission inventory, as well as a domain wide model performance evaluation. The document is in draft final form; however, any revi sions will be included in the final submission of this state implementation plan.

M.1 Appendices: Appendix A: Emission Processing Select ed QA Summ ary Reports and Figures

Appendix B: Air Quality Model Performan ce Evaluation: Regional Model Evaluation across the VISTAS Region

Appendix C: Air Quality Model Performan ce Evaluation: Evaluation at VISTAS and Nearby Class I Areas

Appendix D: Air Quality Model Performan ce Evaluation: Spatial Maps of Model

Perform ance on the Best and Worst 20 Per cent Days at VISTAS and Nearby Class I

Areas

Appendix E: 2018 Visibility Projects at VISTAS and Nearby Class I Areas for the W orst 20 Percent Days using EPA Default Appro ach and Comparison with 2018 Uniform Rate of Progress

Appendix F: 2018 Visibility Pr ojections at VIS TAS and N earby Class I Areas for the Best 20 Percent Days using EPA Default Approach

Appendix G: Evaluation of the 2002 GEOS-CHEM Global Chemistry Model Used for Boundary Conditions in the VI STAS Regional H aze Modeling

Appendix H: Based on “VISTAS Area of Infl uence Analyses for Sulfur Dioxide” by Archuleta, Adhloch, Mansell, Stella and Brewer (Februar y 28, 2007) and “Procedures for Developing and Displaying AoI Back-trajectories Residence Time GIS Data by Mansell (August 29, 2007)Appendix M.2 contains a descrip tion of the procedure for devel oping and displaying the Area of Influence back trajectories and residence tim e data, described in Appendix H of M.1 in

Arc/INFO GIS.[This page intentionally left blank.]
ex10-39.htm


    Exhibit 10.39

    Amendment
to

    Employment
Agreement

    


    This Amendment is made effective as of
November 2, 2009 by and between First Solar, Inc. a Delaware corporation having
its principal office at 350 West Washington Street, Suite 600, Tempe, Arizona
85281 (hereinafter “Employer”) and James Zhu (hereinafter
“Employee”)

    


    WITNESSETH:

    


    WHEREAS,
Employer and Employee are party to an Employment Agreement dated as of December
1, 2008 (the “Employment Agreement”);

     

    WHEREAS,
Employer has promoted Employee to a new position and adjusted Employee’s
compensation to reflect his new role;

     

    WHEREAS,
the parties wish to memorialize these action by amending the Employment
Agreement accordingly;

     

    NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the
foregoing premises, and the mutual covenants, terms and conditions set forth
herein, and intending to be legally bound hereby, Employer and Employee hereby
agree that the Employment Agreement is amended as provided herein.

    


    
      	
              1.

            	
              Section
      1.2 of the Employment Agreement is amended to replace the title “Vice President, Corporate
      Controller” with the title “Chief Accounting
      Officer”.

            


    

    


    
      	
              2.

            	
              Section
      2.1 of the Employment Agreement is amended to the stated Base Salary of
      “Two Hundred Twenty-Nine
      ThousandNine
      Hundred Dollars ($229,900)” (which is reflective
      of Employee’s Base Salary on the date of the Employment Agreement, and
      which is currently Two Hundred Forty-Three Thousand Six Hundred Ninety
      Four Dollars ($243,694)) with “Two Hundred Sixty-Eight
      Thousand, Sixty-Four Dollars ($268,064)”.

            


    

    


    
      	
              3.

            	
              Section
      2.2 of the Employment Agreement is amended to replace the annual bonus
      eligibility from “forty
      percent (40%)” to “forty-five percent
      (45%)”

            


    

    


    
      	
              4.

            	
              Except
      as amended above, the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and
      effect.

            


    

    



    


    IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Employer has caused
this Agreement to be executed by one of its duly authorized officers and
Employee has individually executed this Agreement, each intending to be legally
bound, as of the date first above written.

    


    
      	
              EMPLOYER

            	
              EMPLOYEE

            
	
               

               

               

              /s/ Robert J. Gillette

               

              Robert
      J. Gillette

              Chief
      Executive Officer

            	
               

               

               

              /s/ James Zhu

               

              James
      Zhu

            
	 
      	 
      
	 
      	
              Date:  November
      2, 2009
### Summary of Process Vents: Recalculated MACT Floor Limits 2/25/2014 2 of 3 

## Summary of Calculated Process Vent Limits MACT Floors for PVC Only Facilities MACT Floors for PVC Combined Facilities Determined Using Only Shintech Freeport Data Determined Using Only Westlake Geismar Data

Pollutant Floor Component New Source UPL New Source

Average Pollutant Vinyl Chloride 99% UPL 0.00500 Vinyl Chloride ppmvd @ 3% O2 3xDL 0.5523 ppmvd @ 3% O2

MACT Floor1 0.56 0.0050
HCl 99% UPL 0.421 HCl ppmvd @ 3% O2 3xDL 5.01E-02 ppmvd @ 3% O2

MACT Floor1 0.43 0.12 CDD/CDF TEQ 99% UPL 0.03575 CDD/CDF TEQ ng/dscm @ 3% 02 3xDL 3.74E-02 ng/dscm @ 3% 02

MACT Floor1 0.0380 0.012
TOHAP 99% UPL 0.217 TOHAP ppmvd @ 3% O2 3xDL 5.42E+00 ppmvd @ 3% O2

MACT Floor1 5.50 0.22 [1] - MACT Floors rounded UP -two significant figures [1] - MACT Floors rounded UP -two significant figures VI Summary Table 13

PVC-Only Process Vent Vinyl Chloride,

ppmv 0.56 Shintech Freeport 3X DL 0.6 (1)
Dioxin, ng/dscm 0.038 Formosa Delaware 3X DL 0.038 Total Hydrocarbon, ppmv as C3 7 Shintech Freeport 99.0% UPL 7 Total Organic HAP, ppmv 5.5 Shintech Freeport 3X DL 5.5 Final Rule New Source Determination Basis VI Proposed New Source Determination Basis Organic HAP & Hydrocarbon Limits Only
PUBLIC LAW 109–368—NOV. 17, 2006 120 STAT. 2641

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 6326:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 152 (2006):

Nov. 15, considered and passed House and Senate.

Æ

Public Law 109–368

109th Congress

An Act

To clarify the provision of nutrition services to older Americans.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. NUTRITION ASSISTANCE.

Notwithstanding section 311 of the Older Americans Act of

1965 (42 U.S.C. 3030a), as amended by Public Law 109-365, the

Secretary of Agriculture shall fulfill, and accept reimbursement

from the Secretary of Health and Human Services for, commodity

procurement requests for fiscal year 2007 submitted by the States

(as defined in section 102 of the Older Americans Act of 1965)

and tribal organizations (as defined in section 102 of such Act)

before November 14, 2006, in support of the operation of the nutrition services incentive program authorized by section 311 of such

Act as in effect on October 16, 2006.

Approved November 17, 2006.

Nov. 17 2006

[H.R. 6326]
PGI Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation

PGI Part 242 - CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION

PGI Part 243 - CONTRACT MODIFICATIONS

PGI Part 244 - SUBCONTRACTING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES

PGI Part 245 - GOVERNMENT PROPERTY

PGI Part 246 - QUALITY ASSURANCE

PGI Part 247 - TRANSPORTATION

PGI Part 249 - TERMINATION OF CONTRACTS

PGI Part 250 - EXTRAORDINARYCONTRACTUAL ACTIONS

PGI Part 251 - USE OF GOVERNMENT SOURCES BY CONTRACTORS

Parent topic: PGI Subchapter G - CONTRACT MANAGEMENT
# Subpart 2808.4 - Federal Supply Schedules

**Parent topic:**PART 2808 - REQUIRED SOURCES OF SUPPLIES AND SERVICES

## 2808.405 Ordering procedures for Federal Supply Schedules.

## 2808.405-3 Blanket purchase agreements (BPAs).

The SPE is the agency head for purposes of FAR 8.405-3(a)(3)(ii).
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. William Bray, Appellant, v. John T. Deegan, as Warden of Sing Sing Prison, Respondent.

In a habeas corpus proceeding the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated August 20, 1968, which dismissed the writ. Judgment affirmed, without costs. We affirm the dismissal of the writ on the ground that no reason of practicality or necessity was asserted to justify review of the matters raised by habeas corpus while relator’s consolidated appeal from the judgment of conviction and from the denial of an application for *coram nobis*relief is pending *(People ex rel. Keitt*v. *McMann,*18 N Y 2d 257, 262; *People ex rel. Blyden*v. *Denno,*28 A D 2d 683, cert. den. 390 U. S. 966; *People ex rel. Singleton*v. *Deegan,*31 A D 2d 769). Beldock, P. J., Christ, Brennan, Hopkins and Martuscello, JJ., concur.
Case 2:06-cv-00766-MHT-TFM Document 14 Filed 02/08/2007 Page 1 of 12
Case 2:06-cv-00766-MHT-TFM Document 14 Filed 02/08/2007 Page 2 of 12
Case 2:06-cv-00766-MHT-TFM Document 14 Filed 02/08/2007 Page 3 of 12
Case 2:06-cv-00766-MHT-TFM Document 14 Filed 02/08/2007 Page 4 of 12
Case 2:06-cv-00766-MHT-TFM Document 14 Filed 02/08/2007 Page 5 of 12
Case 2:06-cv-00766-MHT-TFM Document 14 Filed 02/08/2007 Page 6 of 12
Case 2:06-cv-00766-MHT-TFM Document 14 Filed 02/08/2007 Page 7 of 12
Case 2:06-cv-00766-MHT-TFM Document 14 Filed 02/08/2007 Page 8 of 12
Case 2:06-cv-00766-MHT-TFM Document 14 Filed 02/08/2007 Page 9 of 12
Case 2:06-cv-00766-MHT-TFM Document 14 Filed 02/08/2007 Page 10 of 12
Case 2:06-cv-00766-MHT-TFM Document 14 Filed 02/08/2007 Page 11 of 12
Case 2:06-cv-00766-MHT-TFM Document 14 Filed 02/08/2007 Page 12 of 12
229 So.2d 115

#### Louis BARTHELEMY, Sr. and Joseph Duchane v. PHOENIX INSURANCE COMPANY et al.

No. 50204.

Dec. 19, 1969.

In re: Elvira Ethel Duchane, wife of Samuel Ker, and Sarah Butler Duchane applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans. 226 So.2d 603.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal, there is no error of law in its judgment
§ 455.32 Reallocation of funds. ( a ) If a State Plan has not been approved and implemented by a State by the close of the period for which allocated funds are available as set forth in the notice issued by DOE pursuant to § 455.30(c), funds allocated to that State for technical assistance and energy conservation measures will be reallocated among all States for the next grant program cycle, if available.
( b ) Funds which have been allocated to States in a grant program cycle but which have not been obligated to eligible State, school, or hospital grant applicants by the end of that cycle shall be reallocated by DOE among all States in the next grant program cycle.
( c ) Funds which become available due to deobligations resulting from funds returned by grantees due to cost underruns or scope-of-work reductions on completed projects shall be reallocated by DOE among all States in the next grant program cycle.
( d ) Funds which become available because of declined grants to schools and hospitals within a State may be reobligated to other eligible applicants in the State until the December 31 following the close of the cycle for which the funds were allocated to the State. Such funds which have not been reobligated by that deadline shall be reallocated by DOE among all States in the next grant program cycle.
( e ) Funds which become available because of declined or deobligated financial assistance provided through coordinating agencies to schools and hospitals within a State may be reobligated to other eligible applicants in the State until the December 31 following the close of the cycle for which the funds were allocated to the coordinating agency. Such funds which have not been reobligated by that deadline shall be reallocated by DOE among all States in the next grant program cycle.
( f ) Funds granted to States for technical assistance, program assistance, and marketing pursuant to § 455.144 are subject to reallocation by DOE among all the States in the next program cycle if such funds are not committed by the State to their intended purposes by means of grants, contracts, or other legally binding obligations, or redirected to schools and hospitals grant applications pursuant to § 455.144(d), by the December 31 following the close of the cycle for which the funds were allocated to the State.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 504 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 504

Commending the people of the Republic of Iraq for holding a successful 
               referendum on a new constitution for Iraq.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 20, 2005

 Ms. Ginny Brown-Waite of Florida submitted the following resolution; 
     which was referred to the Committee on International Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Commending the people of the Republic of Iraq for holding a successful 
               referendum on a new constitution for Iraq.

Whereas on October 15, 2005, approximately ten million Iraqis participated in 
        voting on a referendum for a new constitution for Iraq;
Whereas there was a high turnout of the Sunni population of Iraq for the 
        referendum;
Whereas Iraqi military and police forces were able to ensure that the referendum 
        was held in a relatively peaceful manner;
Whereas the referendum was held despite the fact that the people of Iraq have 
        experienced insurgency from terrorists who want to prevent the 
        establishment of a free Iraq;
Whereas, in holding the referendum, the people of Iraq took advantage of an 
        opportunity to change their future for the better;
Whereas, in holding the referendum, the people of Iraq demonstrated that there 
        are ways to deal with a country's problems other than by resorting to 
        violence;
Whereas Iraqi voters proudly displayed ink-dipped fingers to demonstrate that 
        they voted in the referendum; and
Whereas the people of Iraq are currently experiencing freedoms they have been 
        denied for so many years: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) commends the people of the Republic of Iraq for holding 
        a successful referendum on a new constitution for Iraq;
            (2) recognizes the tremendous progress Iraq has made in 
        moving toward democracy; and
            (3) commends Iraqi military and police forces for their 
        excellent work to ensure that the referendum was held in a 
        relatively peaceful manner.
                                 <all>
```