alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 140.11 Amounts of financial protection for certain reactors. ( a ) Each licensee is required to have and maintain financial protection: ( 1 ) In the amount of $1,000,000 for each nuclear reactor he is authorized to operate at a thermal power level not exceeding ten kilowatts;
( 2 ) In the amount of $1,500,000 for each nuclear reactor he is authorized to operate at a thermal power level in excess of ten kilowatts but not in excess of one megawatt;
( 3 ) In the amount of $2,500,000 for each nuclear reactor other than a testing reactor or a reactor licensed under section 104b of the Act which he is authorized to operate at a thermal power level exceeding one megawatt but not in excess of ten megawatts; and
( 4 ) In an amount equal to the sum of $500,000,000 and the amount available as secondary financial protection (in the form of private liability insurance available under an industry retrospective rating plan providing for deferred premium charges equal to the pro rata share of the aggregate public liability claims and costs, excluding costs payment of which is not authorized by section 170o.(1)(D) of the Act, in excess of that covered by primary financial protection) for each nuclear reactor which is licensed to operate and which is designed for the production of electrical energy and has a rated capacity of 100,000 electrical kilowatts or more: Provided, however, that under such a plan for deferred premium charges for each nuclear reactor that is licensed to operate, no more than $158,026,000 with respect to any nuclear incident (plus any surcharge assessed under subsection 170o.(1)(E) of the Act) and no more than $24,714,000 per incident within one calendar year shall be charged. *Except that,* where a person is authorized to operate a combination of 2 or more nuclear reactors located at a single site, each of which has a rated capacity of 100,000 or more electrical kilowatts but not more than 300,000 electrical kilowatts with a combined rated capacity of not more than 1,300,000 electrical kilowatts, each such combination of reactors shall be considered to be a single nuclear reactor for the sole purpose of assessing the applicable financial protection required under this section.
( b ) In any case where a person is authorized under parts 50, 52, or 54 of this chapter to operate two or more nuclear reactors at the same location, the total primary financial protection required of the licensee for all such reactors is the highest amount which would otherwise be required for any one of those reactors; provided, that such primary financial protection covers all reactors at the location.
[25 FR 2944, Apr. 7, 1960] Editorial Note
Editorial Note: For Federal Register citations affecting § 140.11, see the List of CFR Sections Affected, which appears in the Finding Aids section of the printed volume and at *www.govinfo.gov .*
<PAGE>
          EXHIBIT 11 - STATEMENT RE COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS


National City Bancshares, Inc.
Earnings per Share Calculation
for the period ending June 30

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                      Quarter to Date        Year to Date     
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                      1997       1996       1997       1996   
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>  
Net income                         $4,582,233 $3,969,125 $8,949,857 $7,738,639 


Primary earnings per share
--------------------------
Weighted average shares outstanding 9,311,410  9,559,772  9,364,659  9,646,950
Common stock equivalents due to 
  stock options                       133,007          -    123,426          - -
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Adjusted shares outstanding         9,444,417  9,559,772  9,488,085  9,646,950

Primary earnings per share              $0.48      $0.41      $0.94      $0.80



Fully diluted earnings per share
--------------------------------
Weighted average shares outstanding 9,311,410  9,559,772  9,364,659  9,646,950
Common stock equivalents due to 
  stock options                       154,871          -    134,973          -
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Adjusted shares outstanding         9,466,281  9,559,772  9,499,632  9,646,950

Fully diluted earnings per share        $0.48      $0.41      $0.94      $0.80

</TABLE>




<PAGE>
§ 503.25 Public interest. ( a ) *Eligibility.* Section 211(c) of the Act provides for a temporary public interest exemption. To qualify, a petitioner must demonstrate that: ( 1 ) The unit will be capable of complying with the applicable prohibitions at the end of the proposed exemption period;
( 2 ) The granting of the exemption would be in accord with the purposes of the Act and would be in the public interest; and
( 3 ) No alternate power supply exists, as required under § 503.8 of these regulations.
( b ) *Evidence required in support of a petition.* The petition must include the following evidence in order to make the demonstration required by this section: ( 1 ) Substantial evidence to corroborate the eligibility requirements identified above; and
( 2 ) The anticipated duration of the circumstances which constitute the basis for the exemption.
( c ) *Certification alternative.* If the petitioner requires use of oil or natural gas in a unit, during the construction of an alternate-fuel fired unit, the petitioner may substitute, in lieu of the evidentiary requirements of paragraphs (b)(1) and (2) of this section: ( 1 ) A duly executed certification, including the requested duration of the exemption, that the unit will be operated on oil or natural gas only during the construction of an alternate fuel fired unit to be owned or operated by the petitioner; and
( 2 ) Exhibits containing the basis for the certifications required under paragraph (c)(1) of this section (including those factual and analytical materials deemed by the petitioner to be sufficient to support the granting of this exemption).
( d ) *Duration.* This temporary exemption, taking into account extension and renewals, may not exceed 5 years.
[46 FR 59903, Dec. 7, 1981, as amended at 54 FR 52894, Dec. 22, 1989]
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications.

 

 

I, Nicholas Galeone, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filedin respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of the UBS-Barclays Commercial Mortgage Trust 2013-C5 (the "ExchangeAct periodic reports");

 

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information requiredto be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report underItem 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligationsunder the servicing agreements in all material respects; and

 

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backedsecurities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities requiredto be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been includedas an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in suchreports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to meby the following unaffiliated parties:

 

Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, MidlandLoan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, as Special Servicer, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Trustee, DeutscheBank Trust Company Americas, as Certificate Administrator, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Custodian, Situs Holdings, LLC, asOperating Advisor, and KeyBank National Association (as successor to KeyCorp Real Estate Capital Markets, Inc.), as Primary Servicer.

 

 

 

Dated: March 16, 2022

 

 

/s/ Nicholas Galeone

 

 

President

(senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
1

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket Nos. 45690 & 45691

STATE OF IDAHO,

Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

WYATT TRIPP,

Defendant-Appellant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Filed: September 11, 2018

Karel A. Lehrman, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED

OPINION AND SHALL NOT

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Seventh Judicial District, State of Idaho, 

Bingham County. Hon. Darren B. Simpson, District Judge. 

Judgment of conviction and unified sentence of five years, with a minimum 

period of confinement of four years, for felony fleeing or attempting to elude a 

peace officer and consecutive unified sentence of fourteen years, with a minimum 

period of confinement of three years, for grand theft, affirmed. 

Eric D. Fredericksen, State Appellate Public Defender; Maya P. Waldron, Deputy 

Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. 

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney 

General, Boise, for respondent. 

________________________________________________

Before GUTIERREZ, Judge; HUSKEY, Judge;

and LORELLO, Judge

________________________________________________

PER CURIAM

In these consolidated appeals, Wyatt Tripp pled guilty to felony fleeing or attempting to 

elude a peace officer, I.C. § 49-1404(2)(a), (b), (c) and/or (d); and grand theft, I.C. §§ 18-2403(1) 

and 18-2407(1)(b)(4). In exchange for his guilty pleas, additional charges were dismissed 

including an allegation that he is a persistent violator. The district court sentenced Tripp to a 

unified term of five years, with a minimum period of confinement of four years, for felony 

fleeing or attempting to elude a peace officer and a consecutive unified term of fourteen years, 
2

with a minimum period of confinement of three years, for grand theft. Tripp filed I.C.R. 35 

motions for reduction of his sentences, which the district court denied. Tripp appeals, arguing 

that the district court erred in ordering that his sentences be served consecutively and that his 

sentence for grand theft is excessive. 

Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the 

factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and 

need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez, 121 Idaho 114, 117-18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014-

15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez, 106 Idaho 447, 449-51, 680 P.2d 869, 871-73 (Ct. App. 

1984); State v. Toohill, 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing 

the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver, 144 Idaho 

722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record 

in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.

Therefore, Tripp’s judgments of conviction and sentences are affirmed.
§ 60.101 Purpose and nature of findings. ( a ) ( 1 ) Subpart B of this part prescribes the standards for issuance of a license to receive and possess source, special nuclear, or byproduct material at a geologic repository operations area. In particular, § 60.41(c) requires a finding that the issuance of a license will not constitute an unreasonable risk to the health and safety of the public. The purpose of this subpart is to set out performance objectives and site and design criteria which, if satisfied, will support such a finding of no unreasonable risk.
( 2 ) While these performance objectives and criteria are generally stated in unqualified terms, it is not expected that complete assurance that they will be met can be presented. A reasonable assurance, on the basis of the record before the Commission, that the objectives and criteria will be met is the general standard that is required. For § 60.112, and other portions of this subpart that impose objectives and criteria for repository performance over long times into the future, there will inevitably be greater uncertainties. Proof of the future performance of engineered barrier systems and the geologic setting over time periods of many hundreds or many thousands of years is not to be had in the ordinary sense of the word. For such long-term objectives and criteria, what is required is reasonable assurance, making allowance for the time period, hazards, and uncertainties involved, that the outcome will be in conformance with those objectives and criteria. Demonstration of compliance with such objectives and criteria will involve the use of data from accelerated tests and predictive models that are supported by such measures as field and laboratory tests, monitoring data and natural analog studies.
( b ) Subpart B of this part also lists findings that must be made in support of an authorization to construct a geologic repository operations area. In particular, § 60.31(a) requires a finding that there is reasonable assurance that the types and amounts of radioactive materials described in the application can be received, possessed, and disposed of in a geologic repository operations area of the design proposed without unreasonable risk to the health and safety of the public. As stated in that paragraph, in arriving at this determination, the Commission will consider whether the site and design comply with the criteria contained in this subpart. Once again, while the criteria may be written in unqualified terms, the demonstration of compliance may take uncertainties and gaps in knowledge into account, provided that the Commission can make the specified finding of reasonable assurance as specified in paragraph (a) of this section.
§ 52.158 Contents of application; additional technical information. The application must contain: ( a ) ( 1 ) *Inspections, tests, analyses, and acceptance criteria (ITAAC).* The proposed inspections, tests, and analyses that the licensee who will be operating the reactor shall perform, and the acceptance criteria that are necessary and sufficient to provide reasonable assurance that, if the inspections, tests, and analyses are performed and the acceptance criteria met: ( i ) The reactor has been manufactured in conformity with the manufacturing license, the provisions of the Act, and the Commission's rules and regulations; and
( ii ) The manufactured reactor will be operated in conformity with the approved design and any license authorizing operation of the manufactured reactor.
( 2 ) If the application references a standard design certification, the ITAAC contained in the certified design must apply to those portions of the facility design which are covered by the design certification.
( 3 ) If the application references a standard design certification, the application may include a notification that a required inspection, test, or analysis in the design certification ITAAC has been successfully completed and that the corresponding acceptance criterion has been met. The Federal Register notification required by § 52.163 must indicate that the application includes this notification.
( b ) ( 1 ) An environmental report as required by 10 CFR 51.54.
( 2 ) If the manufacturing license application references a standard design certification, the environmental report need not contain a discussion of severe accident mitigation design alternatives for the reactor.
[72 FR 49517, Aug. 28, 2007, as amended at 89 FR 57721, July 16, 2024]
(October 7, 1980)

#### Katharine S. J. Law, Appellant, v Louis L. Friedman et al., Respondents.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on March 4, 1980, unanimously affirmed, for reasons stated by A. R. Tyler, J., at Trial Term, without costs and without disbursements. Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Ross, Markewich, Yesawich and Carro, JJ.
**EXHIBIT 32.1CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

       In connection with the quarterlyreport of CNB Corporation on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2009as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, W.Jennings Duncan, President and Chief Executive Officer of CNB Corporation,certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:
| 1.     | The  above-listed Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)  or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                 |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                         |
| 2.     | The  information contained in the above-listed Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all  material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the  Company. |
| Date:  May 11, 2009 | /s/W, Jennings Duncan                     W. Jennings  Duncan  President and Chief Executive Officer |
|--------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                          |                                                                                                                                                                                                               |
Case 2:06-cv-00756-MHT-WC Document 19 Filed 10/20/2006 Page 1 of 1
PGI 201.301 Policy.       (b)(i) Contract clauses and solicitation provisions developed by departments and agencies (local clauses) that constitute a significant revision, as defined at FAR 1.501-1, shall be—          (A) Published for public comment in the Federal Register in accordance with FAR 1.501; and          (B) Approved in accordance with DFARS 201.304.          (ii) A local clause is considered a significant revision, as defined at FAR 1.501-1, if the clause—          (A) Contains a new certification requirement for contractors or offerors that is not imposed by statute (see FAR 1.107 and DFARS 201.107 and 201.304(2));          (B) Constitutes a deviation (as defined at FAR 1.401) from the parts and subparts identified at DFARS 201.402(1); or          (C) Will be used on a repetitive basis; and          (*1*) Imposes a new requirement for the collection of information from 10 or more members of the public (see FAR 1.106); or          (*2*) Has any cost or administrative impact on contractors or offerors beyond that contained in the FAR or DFARS.          (iii) A local clause is not considered a significant revision as defined at FAR 1.501-1, if the clause—          (A) Is for a single-use intended to meet the needs of an individual acquisition (e.g. a clause developed as a result of negotiations and documented in the business clearance or similar document), except for clauses that constitute a deviation (as defined at FAR 1.401) from the parts and subparts identified at DFARS 201.402(1); or          (B) May be used on a repetitive basis and has no new or additional cost or administrative impact on contractors or offerors beyond any cost or administrative impact contained in existing FAR or DFARS coverage.    **Parent topic:** PGI 201.3 -AGENCY ACQUISITION REGULATIONS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                    JUN-30-1999             DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                               695648                       0
<SECURITIES>                              0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                             0                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                              0                       0
<INVENTORY>                               0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          0                       0
<PP&E>                             13705691                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                      7754403                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                      6698357                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     0                       0
<BONDS>                                   0                       0
<COMMON>                                  0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0                       0
<PREFERRED>                               0                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                0                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>        6698357                       0
<SALES>                             1438577                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                    1443628                       0
<CGS>                                     0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             0                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                      440840                       0
<INCOME-TAX>                              0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                  440840                       0
<DISCONTINUED>                            0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0                       0
<CHANGES>                                 0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                         440840                       0
<EPS-BASIC>                             0                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                             0                       0


</TABLE>
#### § 5.120 Transfers of property.

If a recipient sells or otherwise transfers property financed in whole or in part with Federal financial assistance to a transferee that operates any education program or activity, and the Federal share of the fair market value of the property is not upon such sale or transfer properly accounted for to the Federal Government, both the transferor and the transferee shall be deemed to be recipients, subject to the provisions of §§ 5.205 through 5.235(a).
###### Editorial Note on Part 420

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 420 appear at 64 FR 46114, Aug. 24, 1999.

#### § 420.16 Extensions for compliance with required program activities.

An extension of time by which a required program activity must be ready for implementation may be granted if DOE determines that the extension is justified. A written request for an extension, with accompanying justification and an action plan acceptable to DOE for achieving compliance in the shortest reasonable time, shall be made to the cognizant Regional Office Director. Any extension shall be only for the shortest reasonable time that DOE determines necessary to achieve compliance. The action plan shall contain a schedule for full compliance and shall identify and make the most reasonable commitment possible to provision of the resources necessary for achieving the scheduled compliance.