alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
###### Editorial Note on Part 51

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 51 appear at 80 FR 74980, Dec. 1, 2015.

#### § 51.108 Public hearings on Commission findings that inspections, tests, analyses, and acceptance criteria of combined licenses are met.

In any public hearing requested under 10 CFR 52.103(b), the Commission will not admit any contentions on environmental issues, the adequacy of the environmental impact statement for the combined license issued under subpart C of part 52, or the adequacy of any other environmental impact statement or environmental assessment referenced in the combined license application. The Commission will not make any environmental findings in connection with the finding under 10 CFR 52.103(g).

[72 FR 49517, Aug. 28, 2007]
H. Res. 492

In the House of Representatives, U.S., 

October 18, 2005.

Whereas on October 8, 2005, a powerful earthquake measuring 7.6 on the Richter Scale occurred in Pakistan and 

India, centered on the city of Muzaffarabad; 

Whereas the earthquake caused severe damage in both Pakistan and India; 

Whereas the earthquake and continuing aftershocks have 

caused more than 50,000 deaths, resulted in serious injuries to additional tens of thousands of people, and left between 2.5 and 3 million homeless as winter in the affected mountainous region approaches; 

Whereas millions of people throughout the affected region 

currently lack clean water, food, proper sanitation, basic 

healthcare, adequate shelter, and other necessities, thereby increasing the risk of additional suffering and death; 

and 

Whereas the United States and donors from at least 30 other 

countries have, to date, pledged several hundred million 

dollars in emergency and long-term reconstruction assistance, and have begun to deliver humanitarian supplies to 

survivors of the earthquake: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved, That the House of Representatives—
2

•HRES 492 EH 

(1) mourns the tragic loss of life and horrendous 

suffering caused by the earthquake that occurred on October 8, 2005, in Pakistan and India; 

(2) expresses the deepest condolences of the American people to the families, communities, and governments of the tens of thousands of individuals who lost 

their lives in this earthquake; 

(3) welcomes and commends the prompt international humanitarian response to the earthquake by the 

governments of many countries, the United Nations and 

other international organizations, and nongovernmental 

organizations; 

(4) expresses gratitude and respect for the courageous and committed work of all individuals providing 

aid, relief and assistance, including United States civilian and military personnel, who are working to save lives 

and provide relief in the devastated areas; and 

(5) supports the actions to assist the victims taken 

by the President and the Government of the United 
3

•HRES 492 EH 

States to provide all appropriate assistance to the governments and people of the affected region.

Attest:

Clerk.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

186 

CA 11-00985 

PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., FAHEY, PERADOTTO, CARNI, AND LINDLEY, JJ. 

 

MICHAEL REW, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, 

V ORDER

VALEO, INC. AND VALEO ENGINE COOLING, INC., 

DEFENDANTS. 

---------------------------------------------- 

VALEO, INC., THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

V

 

DIVERSIFIED ERECTION SERVICES, INC., 

THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

 

KENNEY SHELTON LIPTAK NOWAK LLP, BUFFALO (WENDY A. SCOTT OF COUNSEL),

FOR THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

PHILLIPS LYTLE LLP, BUFFALO (WILLIAM D. CHRIST OF COUNSEL), FOR

THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT. 

BROWN CHIARI LLP, LANCASTER (SAMUEL J. CAPIZZI OF COUNSEL), FOR

PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from an amended order of the Supreme Court, Niagara County

(Ralph A. Boniello, III, J.), entered December 22, 2010 in a personal

injury action. The amended order, among other things, denied in part

third-party defendant’s motion for summary judgment. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the amended order so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed without costs. 

Entered: February 17, 2012 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
Subpart 2009.1 - Responsible Prospective Contractors    **Parent topic:** PART 2009 - CONTRACTOR QUALIFICATIONS2009.100 NRC policy.       (a) It is NRC policy that only competitively awarded contracts shall be placed with an individual who was employed by the NRC within two years from the date of the Request for Procurement Action. This policy also applies to:          (1) The noncompetitive award of contracts to organizations where former NRC employees have dominant ownership interests in the organization, such as partners or majority stockholders;          (2) The noncompetitive award of contracts to organizations where former NRC employees have dominant management interests, such as principal officers, or where the organization is predominantly staffed by former NRC employees; and          (3) The noncompetitive award of contracts, task orders or other NRC work assignments where the particular assignment is to be performed by designated former NRC employees, including principal investigators, key personnel, and others who will perform more than a nominal amount of the work in question.          (b) The following procurement actions are considered noncompetitive for the purposes of this policy:          (1) Contracts awarded noncompetitively under the Small Business Administration's 8(a) Program;          (2) Individual task orders if the former employee was not identified as “key personnel” in a proposal which was evaluated under competitive procedures;          (3) Unsolicited proposals;          (4) Subcontracts that require review for the purpose of granting consent under NRC prime contracts.          (c) The term *NRC employee* includes special Government employees performing services for NRC as experts, advisors, consultants, or members of advisory committees, if -          (1) The contract arises directly out of the individual's activity as a special employee;          (2) The individual is in a position to influence the award of the contract; or          (3) The Contracting Officer determines that another conflict of interest exists.          (d) A justification explaining why it is in the best interest of the Government to contract with an individual or firm described in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section on a noncompetitive basis may be approved by the Senior Procurement Executive after consulting with the Executive Director for Operations. This is in addition to any justification and approvals which may be required by the FAR for use of other than full and open competition.          (e) Nothing in this policy statement relieves former employees from obligations prescribed by law, such as 18 U.S.C. 207, Restrictions on Former Officers, Employees, and Elected Officials of the Executive and Legislative Branches.2009.105-70 Contract provisions.       The contracting officer shall insert the following provisions in all solicitations:          (a) Section 2052.209-70 Current/Former Agency Employee Involvement.
IV 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 604 

Recognizing the 100th anniversary of the establishment of the paid Fire 

Department of New York on Staten Island, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 14, 2005 

Mr. FOSSELLA submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Government Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the 100th anniversary of the establishment of 

the paid Fire Department of New York on Staten Island, 

and for other purposes. 

Whereas on October 1, 1905, the paid Fire Department of 

New York on Staten Island (‘‘Staten Island FDNY’’) 

was established when volunteer fire companies on Staten 

Island were consolidated into the Fire Department of 

New York; 

Whereas during World War II, retired members of the Staten 

Island FDNY assisted in the staffing of several forts and 

military installations located on Staten Island; 

Whereas on June 25, 1946, a fire at the St. George Ferry 

Terminal taxed the resources of the Staten Island FDNY 

and injured 257 firefighters who battled the blaze; 
2 

•HRES 604 IH 

Whereas on November 25, 1950, members of the Staten Island FDNY evacuated over 3,000 residents of Oakwood 

Beach, a low-lying area of Staten Island, from over 7 feet 

of rising water after a treacherous storm; 

Whereas on April 30, 1957, the first helicopter used in a firefighting operation in New York City carried members of 

the Staten Island FDNY to an inaccessible marshland on 

the west shore of Staten Island, near the Goethals 

Bridge; 

Whereas the Staten Island FDNY played a crucial role in the 

recovery operation after the mid-air collision between a 

United Airlines aircraft and a Trans World Airlines aircraft that occurred on December 16, 1960; 

Whereas on April 23, 1962, the Staten Island FDNY successfully contained a threatening brush fire 2 miles wide 

and 3 miles long, saving property and part of the Staten 

Island Rapid Transit system; 

Whereas on September 23, 1985, the Staten Island FDNY 

successfully contained a fuel spill measuring thousands of 

gallons, which resulted from the break of a gasoline pipeline and threatened the lives and property of Staten Island residents; 

Whereas on September 11, 2001, FDNY firefighters acted 

selflessly and heroically, suffering countless injuries and 

losses, including the loss of 78 firefighters from Staten 

Island; and 

Whereas the Staten Island FDNY continues to serve the 

community bravely and heroically into its second century: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 
3 

•HRES 604 IH 

1 (1) recognizes the 100th anniversary of the 

2 paid Fire Department of New York on Staten Is3 land; and 

4 (2) honors the sacrifice and bravery of past and 

5 present members of the Fire Department of New 

6 York on Staten Island. 

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     (Replace this text with the legend)
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                               0000812076
<NAME>                                   EX-27
<MULTIPLIER>                             1,000
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                            3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  Feb-28-1998
<PERIOD-START>                     Mar-02-1997
<PERIOD-END>                       May-31-1997
<CASH>                                  24,569
<SECURITIES>                                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                           47,646
<ALLOWANCES>                             1,241
<INVENTORY>                             14,509
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                       101,313
<PP&E>                                  16,822
<DEPRECIATION>                           3,705
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         183,858
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   85,107
<BONDS>                                 32,450
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        0
<PREFERRED>                                  0
<COMMON>                                   475
<OTHER-SE>                              67,071
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           183,858
<SALES>                                 60,177
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        60,609
<CGS>                                   37,714
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           58,614
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                           112
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         825
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          1,467
<INCOME-TAX>                               645
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        822
<DISCONTINUED>                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              0
<CHANGES>                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                               822
<EPS-PRIMARY>                              .02
<EPS-DILUTED>                              .02
        


</TABLE>
H. Res. 361

In the House of Representatives, U.S., 

July 18, 2005.

Whereas in the history of the United States, more than 

48,000,000 citizen-soldiers have served the Nation in uniform, of whom more than 1,000,000 gave their lives as 

a consequence of their duties; 

Whereas as of July 21, 2005, there are more than 

25,000,000 living veterans; 

Whereas the Nation’s obligation to its veterans is encapsulated in the following words of President Abraham Lincoln’s Second Inaugural Address, delivered on March 4, 

1865, ‘‘. . . to care for him who shall have borne the 

battle and for his widow and his orphan’’; 

Whereas on July 21, 1930, President Herbert Hoover issued 

an executive order creating a new agency, the Veterans’ 

Administration, to ‘‘consolidate and coordinate Government activities affecting war veterans’’; 

Whereas on October 25, 1988, President Ronald Reagan 

signed into law the Department of Veterans Affairs Act 

(Public Law 100–527) under which, effective as of March 

15, 1989, the Veterans’ Administration was established 

as an executive department and redesignated as the Department of Veterans Affairs, with the mission of pro-
2

•HRES 361 EH 

viding Federal benefits to veterans and their families; 

and 

Whereas in 2005, the 230,000 employees of the Department 

of Veterans Affairs continue the tradition of their predecessors, caring for the Nation’s veterans with dedication 

and compassion and upholding the high standards required of them as stewards of the public’s gratitude to 

those veterans: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

(1) recognizes the 75th anniversary of the establishment of the Veterans’ Administration; and 

(2) acknowledges the achievements of the employees 

of the Veterans’ Administration and the Department of 

Veterans Affairs and commends them for their contributions to the Nation’s veterans. 

Attest:

Clerk.
§ 1303.114 Appeals. ( a ) ( 1 ) *Appeals of adverse determinations.* If you are dissatisfied with the Board's response to your request, you may appeal to the Board's Executive Director: ( i ) By mail to: U.S. Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board, 2300 Clarendon Boulevard, Suite 1300, Arlington, VA 22201;
( ii ) By e-mail to: *foia@nwtrb.gov* specifying that this is a FOIA request in the subject line; or
( iii ) By fax to: 703-235-4495.
( 2 ) The appeal must be in writing and must be received within 30 days of the date of the Board's response. The appeal letter, e-mail, or fax may include as much or as little related information as you wish, as long is it clearly identifies the Board determination that you are appealing, including the assigned request number, if known. For prompt handling, please mark your appeal “Freedom of Information Act Appeal.”
( b ) *Responses to appeals.* Requestors shall be notified in writing of the decision on the appeal. A decision affirming an adverse determination shall include a statement of the reason(s) for the affirmation, including any FOIA exemption(s) applied, and shall include the FOIA provisions for court review of the decision. If the adverse determination is reversed or modified on appeal, the request shall be reprocessed in accordance with that appeal decision.
( c ) *When appeal is required.* If a review by a court or any adverse determination is desired, the determination must first be appealed under this section.
( d ) *Denial of appeal.* An adverse determination by the Executive Director shall be the final action of the Board.
( e ) *Unacceptable appeals.* An appeal will not be acted on if the request becomes a matter of FOIA litigation.
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Archon Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q
for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, Paul W. Lowden, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and John M. Garner, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003, that to our knowledge:



| | (i) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: August 16, 2006



|                                                                                   
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                   
|/s/ Paul W. Lowden                                                                 
|Paul W. Lowden Chairman of the Board and President (Principal Executive Officer)   
|                                                                                   
|/s/ John M. Garner                                                                 
|John M. Garner Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting and Financial Officer)

This certification accompanies the above-described Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by

such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of

1934.
SCWC

- 17

- 0000 102

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI ʻ I

GMAC MORTGAGE, LLC

, Respondent/Plaintiff

- Appellee,

vs.

WAYNE NOELANI TOM; COLEEN ETSUKO TOM,

Respondents/Defendants

- Appellees,

and

JO Y CELYN WANDA UNCIANO,

Petitioner/Defendant

- Appellant,

and

CITIFINANCIAL, INC. 221, LLC, fka ASSOCIATES FINANCIAL SERVICES

COMPANY OF HAWAII, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY; STATE

OF HAWAI ʻ I, DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES; FIRST HAWAIIAN BANK,

fka FIRST INTERSTATE BANK OF HAWAII; CURT DUKE PRATT AND JUDITH

HILOKO PRATT; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF

TAXATION, STATE OF HAWAI ʻ I,

Respondents /Defendant s

- Appell ees.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

(CAAP

- 1 7

- 0000 102 ; CASE NO. 1 CC031001029 )

OR DER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Wilson, and Eddins

, JJ.) Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCWC-17-0000102

11-JUL-2022

01:05 PM

Dkt. 17 ODAC2 Petitioner/Defendant

- Appellant Jo y celyn Wanda

Unciano’s Application for Writ of Certiorari filed on May 31

,

202 2 , is rejected.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai ʻ i

, July 11 , 202 2

.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

/s/ Todd W. Eddins
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) CR. NO. 2:06-cr-198-WKW

) (WO)

RONALD MCQUEEN )

O R D E R

On September 22, 2006, Defendant Ronald McQueen filed a Motion to Continue

Trial. (Doc. # 24.) While the granting of a continuance is left to the sound discretion of the

trial judge, United States v. Warren, 772 F.2d 827, 837 (11th Cir. 1985), the Court is, of

course, limited by the requirements of the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161. The Speedy

Trial Act provides generally that the trial of a defendant in a criminal case shall commence

within 70 days of the latter of the filing date of the indictment or the date the defendant

appeared before a judicial officer in such matter. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(c)(1). See United States

v. Vasser, 916 F.2d 624 (11th Cir. 1990).

The Act excludes from this 70 day period any continuance that the judge grants "on

the basis of his findings that the ends of justice served by taking such action outweigh the

best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial." 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A).

In the motion, counsel for Defendant Ronald McQueen asserts that additional time is

necessary to allow the parties to fully brief, and the Court to fully consider, the motion to

suppress which was filed on September 13, 2006. (Doc. # 23.) The government does not

oppose the motion to continue the trial date. Consequently, the Court concludes that a

Case 2:06-cr-00198-WKW-CSC Document 31 Filed 09/27/2006 Page 1 of 2
continuance of this case is warranted and that the ends of justice served by continuing this

case outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. See United

States v. Davenport, 935 F.2d 1223, 1235 (11th Cir. 1991) (reasonable time necessary for

effective preparation is a significant factor for granting a continuance under the Speedy Trial

Act).

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The motion (Doc. # 24) is GRANTED.

2. The trial of this case is continued from the October 16, 2006, trial term to the

January 8, 2007, trial term.

3. The Magistrate Judge conduct a pretrial conference prior to the January 8, 2007,

trial term.

DONE this 27th day of September, 2006.

 /s/ W. Keith Watkins 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cr-00198-WKW-CSC Document 31 Filed 09/27/2006 Page 2 of 2
120 STAT. 2758 PUBLIC LAW 109–406—DEC. 18, 2006

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 5990:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 152 (2006):

Sept. 28, considered and passed House.

Dec. 6, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 109–406

109th Congress

An Act

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 415 South

5th Avenue in Maywood, Illinois, as the ‘‘Wallace W. Sykes Post Office Building’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. WALLACE W. SYKES POST OFFICE BUILDING.

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal

Service located at 415 South 5th Avenue in Maywood, Illinois,

shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Wallace W. Sykes Post

Office Building’’.

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation,

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference

to the ‘‘Wallace W. Sykes Post Office Building’’.

Approved December 18, 2006.

Dec. 18, 2006

[H.R. 5990]