UNITED STATES
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                                   Form 10-QSB
(Mark One)
[X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
    ACT OF 1934

                 For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2003


[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
    ACT OF 1934


                For the transition period from _________to _________

                         Commission file number 0-14528


                        CENTURY PENSION INCOME FUND XXIII
             (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)



         California                                               94-2963120
(State or other jurisdiction of                                (I.R.S. Employer
 incorporation or organization)                              Identification No.)

                         55 Beattie Place, P.O. Box 1089
                        Greenville, South Carolina 29602
                    (Address of principal executive offices)

                                 (864) 239-1000
                           (Issuer's telephone number)

<PAGE>


                         PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION


ITEM 1.     FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



                        CENTURY PENSION INCOME FUND XXIII

              CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF NET LIABILITIES IN LIQUIDATION
                                   (Unaudited)
                                 (in thousands)

                               September 30, 2003



Assets
  Cash and cash equivalents                                           $ 111
  Receivables and deposits                                                 7
  Debt trustee escrow                                                    779
                                                                         897
Liabilities
  Accounts payable                                                         7
  Other liabilities                                                       99
  Non-recourse promissory notes:
   Principal                                                          11,263
   Interest payable                                                   16,313
  Estimated costs during the period of liquidation                       383
                                                                      28,065

Net liabilities in liquidation                                      $(27,168)


            See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements


<PAGE>

                        CENTURY PENSION INCOME FUND XXIII

              STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN NET LIABILITIES IN LIQUIDATION
                                   (Unaudited)
                                 (in thousands)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                  For the Nine Months
                                                                  Ended September 30,
                                                                  2003           2002

<S>                                                             <C>            <C>
Net liabilities in liquidation at beginning of period           $(25,094)      $(23,942)

Changes in net liabilities in liquidation attributed to:
   (Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents                 (117)           133
   Decrease in receivables and deposits                              (64)            (5)
   Decrease in debt trustee escrow                                  (154)           (18)
   Decrease in investment in properties                           (2,820)            --
   Decrease in accounts payable                                       14              6
   Decrease in tenant security deposits                                5              6
   Increase in accrued property taxes                                 --            (58)
   Increase in other liabilities                                     (25)           (22)
   Increase in non-recourse promissory notes - interest
      payable                                                       (186)        (1,045)
   Decrease in non-recourse promissory notes - principal             583             --
   Decrease in minority interest in consolidated joint
      venture                                                         --            170
   Decrease in estimated costs during the period of
      liquidation                                                    690            452

Net liabilities in liquidation at end of period                 $(27,168)      $(24,323)


            See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

</TABLE>

<PAGE>

                        CENTURY PENSION INCOME FUND XXIII

                   NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
                                   (Unaudited)

Note A - Basis of Presentation

As of December 31, 1999, Century Pension Income Fund XXIII (the "Partnership" or
"Registrant")  adopted the  liquidation  basis of accounting due to the imminent
loss of its investment properties.

The  Partnership's  Nonrecourse  Promissory Notes (the "Notes") are secured by a
deed of trust on all properties owned in fee by the Partnership.  The Notes were
issued in two series.  The "1985 Series Notes", in the original principal amount
of $33,454,000 bear interest at 12% per annum,  and the "1986 Series Notes",  in
the original  principal  amount of  $8,485,000,  bear interest at 10% per annum,
except that portions of the interest  were  deferred,  provided the  Partnership
made minimum interest payments of 5% on the unpaid principal balance.  The Notes
had a balance of principal and deferred interest of approximately $80,000,000 at
their maturity date of February 15, 1999. The  Partnership was unable to satisfy
the Notes at maturity  and as a result,  the  Partnership  was in default on the
Nonrecourse  Promissory Notes. Fox Capital Management Corporation ("FCMC" or the
"Managing General Partner")  contacted the indenture trustee for the Nonrecourse
Promissory Notes regarding this default. In connection with these conversations,
on July 30, 1999 the Partnership  entered into a forbearance  agreement with the
indenture trustee pursuant to which the indenture trustee agreed not to exercise
its rights and remedies  under the indenture  for up to 390 days.  In turn,  the
Partnership  agreed to (a) deliver to the  indenture  trustee for the benefit of
the  noteholders all of the accumulated  cash of the  Partnership,  less certain
reserves and anticipated  operating  expenses,  (b) market all of its properties
for sale,  (c) deliver  all net cash  proceeds  from any sales to the  indenture
trustee  until the notes are fully  satisfied  and (d) comply with the reporting
requirements  under the indenture.  On March 31, 2003, the Partnership  sold the
last remaining property, Commerce Plaza, to an unaffiliated third party. The net
sales  proceeds of  approximately  $1,270,000  were  delivered to the  indenture
trustee to be applied to the amounts due to the noteholders.

The sale of the Partnership's  last remaining asset did not generate  sufficient
proceeds to pay off the Notes in full. Upon the last payment on the Notes by the
indenture trustee, the Partnership is expected to terminate.

As a result of the  decision  to  liquidate  the  Partnership,  the  Partnership
changed its basis of accounting for its financial  statements to the liquidation
basis of  accounting.  Consequently,  assets have been valued at  estimated  net
realizable  value and liabilities  are presented at their  estimated  settlement
amounts, including estimated costs associated with carrying out the liquidation.
The valuation of assets and liabilities  necessarily requires many estimates and
assumptions  and  there  are  substantial  uncertainties  in  carrying  out  the
liquidation.  The actual  realization  of assets and  settlement of  liabilities
could be higher or lower than amounts  indicated  and is based upon the Managing
General  Partner's  estimates  as of  the  date  of the  consolidated  financial
statements.

Included in liabilities in the statement of net liabilities in liquidation as of
September 30, 2003 is approximately  $383,000 of costs that the Managing General
Partner estimates will be incurred during the period of liquidation based on the
assumption that the liquidation  process will be completed by December 31, 2003.
Because the success in  realization  of assets and the settlement of liabilities
is based on the Managing  General  Partner's  best  estimates,  the  liquidation
period may be shorter than projected or it may be extended  beyond the projected
period.

Note B - Transactions with Affiliated Parties

The  Partnership  has no employees  and is  dependent  on the  Managing  General
Partner  and  its  affiliates  for  the  management  and  administration  of all
partnership activities.  The Partnership Agreement provides for certain payments
to affiliates for services and as reimbursement of certain expenses  incurred by
affiliates on behalf of the Partnership.

An  affiliate  of  the  Managing  General  Partner  received   reimbursement  of
accountable  administrative  expenses  amounting  to  approximately  $93,000 and
$69,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

The  Partnership  insured its  property up to certain  limits  through  coverage
provided by AIMCO which is  generally  self-insured  for a portion of losses and
liabilities  related to workers  compensation,  property  casualty  and  vehicle
liability.  The Partnership  insured its property above the AIMCO limits through
insurance  policies  obtained  by  AIMCO  from  insurers  unaffiliated  with the
Managing General Partner.  During 2002, the Partnership was charged by AIMCO and
its affiliates  approximately $24,000 for insurance coverage and fees associated
with policy claims  administration.  No such coverage was charged during 2003 as
the remaining property was sold.

Note C - Legal Proceedings

In March 1998, several putative unit holders of limited partnership units of the
Partnership  commenced an action  entitled  Rosalie  Nuanes,  et al. v. Insignia
Financial Group, Inc., et al. (the "Nuanes action") in the Superior Court of the
State of  California  for the  County  of San  Mateo.  The  plaintiffs  named as
defendants,  among others,  the  Partnership,  its Managing  General Partner and
several of their  affiliated  partnerships  and corporate  entities.  The action
purported  to  assert  claims  on  behalf  of a class of  limited  partners  and
derivatively  on behalf  of a number  of  limited  partnerships  (including  the
Partnership)  that are named as nominal  defendants,  challenging,  among  other
things,  the  acquisition  of  interests  in certain  Managing  General  Partner
entities by Insignia Financial Group, Inc.  ("Insignia") and entities that were,
at one  time,  affiliates  of  Insignia;  past  tender  offers  by the  Insignia
affiliates to acquire limited partnership units;  management of the partnerships
by the  Insignia  affiliates;  and the series of  transactions  which  closed on
October 1, 1998 and February 26, 1999 whereby  Insignia and Insignia  Properties
Trust,  respectively,  were merged into AIMCO.  The plaintiffs  sought  monetary
damages and equitable relief, including judicial dissolution of the Partnership.
In addition, during the third quarter of 2001, a complaint (the "Heller action")
was filed  against  the same  defendants  that are named in the  Nuanes  action,
captioned  Heller v.  Insignia  Financial  Group.  On or about  August 6,  2001,
plaintiffs filed a first amended  complaint.  The Heller action was brought as a
purported derivative action, and asserted claims for, among other things, breach
of fiduciary  duty,  unfair  competition,  conversion,  unjust  enrichment,  and
judicial dissolution.

On January 8, 2003,  the parties filed a  Stipulation  of Settlement in proposed
settlement  of the Nuanes  action and the Heller  action.  The  settlement  only
benefits limited partners as of December 20, 2002 in those limited  partnerships
named in the complaint  that are not in the process of being  liquidated or that
have already been  liquidated.  The  Partnership's  limited partners will not be
entitled to any proceeds from the  settlement  since the  Partnership  is in the
process of being liquidated,  but have not compromised any potential claims as a
result of the settlement  and  dismissal.  The  Partnership's  limited  partners
should have received a Notice to  Non-Settling  Persons  during April 2003 which
describes this information in more detail.

On June 13, 2003, the Court granted final approval of the settlement and entered
judgment in both the Nuanes and Heller actions.  On August 12, 2003, an objector
filed an appeal  seeking  to vacate  and/or  reverse  the  order  approving  the
settlement and entering judgment  thereto.  The Managing General Partner intends
to file a respondent's  brief in support of the order  approving  settlement and
entering judgment thereto.

The  Managing  General  Partner  does  not  anticipate  that  any  costs  to the
Partnership, whether legal or settlement costs, associated with these cases will
be material to the Partnership's overall operations.

The  Partnership  is unaware  of any other  pending  or  outstanding  litigation
matters  involving it that are not of a routine  nature  arising in the ordinary
course of business.

ITEM 2.     MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OR PLAN OF OPERATION

The matters discussed in this report contain certain forward-looking statements,
including, without limitation, statements regarding future financial performance
and the effect of government  regulations.  Actual results may differ materially
from those described in the forward-looking statements and will be affected by a
variety of risks and factors including,  without limitation:  national and local
economic  conditions;  the terms of  governmental  regulations  that  affect the
Registrant and interpretations of those regulations; the competitive environment
in which the Registrant  operates;  litigation,  including costs associated with
prosecuting and defending claims and any adverse outcomes,  and financing risks,
including the risk that cash flows from  operations may be  insufficient to meet
required payments of principal and interest. Readers should carefully review the
Registrant's  financial  statements and the notes  thereto,  as well as the risk
factors  described in the documents the Registrant  files from time to time with
the Securities and Exchange Commission.

As of December  31,  1999,  the  Partnership  adopted the  liquidation  basis of
accounting  due  to  the  imminent  loss  of  its  investment  properties.   The
Nonrecourse Promissory Notes had a balance of principal and deferred interest of
approximately  $80,000,000  at their  maturity  date of February 15,  1999.  The
Partnership was unable to satisfy the Nonrecourse Promissory Notes (the "Notes")
at maturity and as a result,  the Partnership  was in default on the Notes.  The
Managing General Partner contacted the indenture trustee for the Notes regarding
this default.  In connection  with these  conversations,  on July 30, 1999,  the
Partnership  entered into a forbearance  agreement  with the  indenture  trustee
pursuant to which the  indenture  trustee  agreed not to exercise its rights and
remedies under the Notes' indenture for up to 390 days. In turn, the Partnership
agreed to (a)  deliver to the Notes'  indenture  trustee  for the benefit of the
noteholders  all of  the  accumulated  cash  of the  Partnership,  less  certain
reserves and anticipated  operating  expenses,  (b) market all of its properties
for sale,  (c) deliver  all net cash  proceeds  from any sales to the  indenture
trustee  until the notes are fully  satisfied  and (d) comply with the reporting
requirements under the indenture.

On March 31, 2003, the Partnership  sold the last remaining  property,  Commerce
Plaza to an  unaffiliated  third party for net sales  proceeds of  approximately
$1,270,000  after the payment of closing  costs.  The proceeds were delivered to
the indenture trustee to be applied to the amounts due to the noteholders.

The sale of the Partnership's  last remaining asset did not generate  sufficient
proceeds to pay off the Notes in full. Upon the last payment on the Notes by the
indenture trustee, the Partnership is expected to terminate.

As a result of the  decision  to  liquidate  the  Partnership,  the  Partnership
changed its basis of accounting for its financial  statements to the liquidation
basis of  accounting.  Consequently,  assets have been valued at  estimated  net
realizable  value and liabilities  are presented at their  estimated  settlement
amounts, including estimated costs associated with carrying out the liquidation.
The valuation of assets and liabilities  necessarily requires many estimates and
assumptions  and  there  are  substantial  uncertainties  in  carrying  out  the
liquidation.  The actual  realization  of assets and  settlement of  liabilities
could be higher or lower than amounts  indicated  and is based upon the Managing
General  Partner's  estimates  as of  the  date  of the  consolidated  financial
statements.

During the nine months ended  September 30, 2003, net  liabilities  increased by
approximately  $2,074,000.  This  increase  is  primarily  due to  decreases  in
investment  properties  and the  debt  trustee  escrow  and an  increase  in the
interest  payable on the promissory  notes partially  offset by decreases in the
principal on the  non-recourse  promissory  notes and the estimated costs during
the period of liquidation.  The decrease in investment properties is a result of
the sale of Commerce  Plaza.  The decrease in the debt trustee  escrow is due to
the payment of expenses by the trustee.  The increase in the interest payable is
due to the monthly  interest  accrued on the notes partially offset by a payment
made to the  noteholders.  The  decrease in the  principal  on the  non-recourse
promissory notes is due to the payment made to the noteholders.  The decrease in
the estimated  costs of  liquidation  is due to the shorter period of time until
the Partnership's expected liquidation.

During the nine months ended  September 30, 2002, net  liabilities  increased by
approximately  $381,000.  This  increase is  primarily  due to a decrease in the
estimated  costs  during  the  period  of  liquidation  and  investment  in  the
consolidated  joint  venture  partially  offset by an increase  in the  interest
payable on the  non-recourse  promissory  notes.  The decrease in the  estimated
costs during the period of  liquidation  was primarily due to the reduced number
of months until the Partnership's expected liquidation. The increase in interest
payable  was due to the  accrual  of nine  months  of  interest  on the  current
principal balance of approximately $11,847,000.

The  statement  of net  liabilities  in  liquidation  as of  September  30, 2003
includes  approximately  $383,000  of costs that the  Managing  General  Partner
estimates  will be  incurred  during  the  period of  liquidation,  based on the
assumption that the liquidation  process will be completed by December 31, 2003.
Because the success in  realization  of assets and the settlement of liabilities
is based on the Managing  General  Partner's  best  estimates,  the  liquidation
period may be shorter or extended beyond the projected period.

As a result of the sale of Commerce Plaza,  the Partnership made payments on the
non-recourse  notes  of the  following  amounts  during  the nine  months  ended
September 30, 2003 and 2002 (in thousands):

                                  Nine Months Ended            Nine Months Ended
                                  September 30, 2003          September 30, 2002
Operations
  85 Series Notes                       $1,169                        $ --
  86 Series Notes                          239                          --
                                        $1,408                        $ --

The following is a general  description of the tax consequences  that may result
to a limited partner due to the sale of the  Partnership's  remaining  property.
Each limited partner should consult with his or her own tax advisor to determine
his or her particular tax  consequences.  The taxable gain and income  resulting
from the sale of the  Partnership's  property  will pass  through to the limited
partners, and will likely result in income tax liability to the limited partners
without any distribution of cash from the Partnership.

The Managing  General  Partner  monitors  developments  in the area of legal and
regulatory   compliance  and  is  studying  new  federal  laws,   including  the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 mandates or suggests
additional compliance measures with regard to governance,  disclosure, audit and
other areas.  In light of these changes,  the  Partnership  expects that it will
incur higher expenses related to compliance, including increased legal and audit
fees.

In addition to its  indirect  ownership of the general  partner  interest in the
Partnership,  AIMCO owned 108  limited  partnership  units (the  "Units") in the
Partnership  representing  approximately  0.11%  of  the  outstanding  Units  at
September 30, 2003.  Affiliates of the Managing General Partner also owned 5,511
Individual   Investor  Units  (8.24%)  of  the  Partnership's  1985  Nonrecourse
Promissory   Notes  and  1,635   Individual   Investor   Units  (9.64%)  of  the
Partnership's 1986 Nonrecourse  Promissory Notes at September 30, 2003. Although
the Managing  General Partner owes fiduciary  duties to the limited  partners of
the  Partnership,  the Managing  General  Partner also owes fiduciary  duties to
AIMCO as its sole stockholder.  As a result,  the duties of the Managing General
Partner,  as  managing  general  partner,  to the  Partnership  and its  limited
partners may come into conflict with the duties of the Managing  General Partner
to AIMCO, as its sole stockholder.

ITEM 3.     CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

(a) Disclosure Controls and Procedures.  The Partnership's management,  with the
participation of the principal executive officer and principal financial officer
of the Managing  General  Partner,  who are the equivalent of the  Partnership's
principal executive officer and principal financial officer,  respectively,  has
evaluated  the  effectiveness  of  the  Partnership's  disclosure  controls  and
procedures (as such term is defined in Rules  13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)  under the
Securities  Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act")) as of the end
of the period covered by this report.  Based on such  evaluation,  the principal
executive  officer  and  principal  financial  officer of the  Managing  General
Partner, who are the equivalent of the Partnership's principal executive officer
and principal  financial officer,  respectively,  have concluded that, as of the
end of such period,  the  Partnership's  disclosure  controls and procedures are
effective.

(b) Internal Control Over Financial  Reporting.  There have not been any changes
in the Partnership's  internal control over financial reporting (as such term is
defined in Rules  13a-15(f)  and  15d-15(f)  under the Exchange  Act) during the
fiscal quarter to which this report relates that have  materially  affected,  or
are reasonably likely to materially affect,  the Partnership's  internal control
over financial reporting.


                           PART II - OTHER INFORMATION


ITEM 1.     LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

In March 1998, several putative unit holders of limited partnership units of the
Partnership  commenced an action  entitled  Rosalie  Nuanes,  et al. v. Insignia
Financial Group, Inc., et al. (the "Nuanes action") in the Superior Court of the
State of  California  for the  County  of San  Mateo.  The  plaintiffs  named as
defendants,  among others,  the  Partnership,  its Managing  General Partner and
several of their  affiliated  partnerships  and corporate  entities.  The action
purported  to  assert  claims  on  behalf  of a class of  limited  partners  and
derivatively  on behalf  of a number  of  limited  partnerships  (including  the
Partnership)  that are named as nominal  defendants,  challenging,  among  other
things,  the  acquisition  of  interests  in certain  Managing  General  Partner
entities by Insignia Financial Group, Inc.  ("Insignia") and entities that were,
at one  time,  affiliates  of  Insignia;  past  tender  offers  by the  Insignia
affiliates to acquire limited partnership units;  management of the partnerships
by the  Insignia  affiliates;  and the series of  transactions  which  closed on
October 1, 1998 and February 26, 1999 whereby  Insignia and Insignia  Properties
Trust,  respectively,  were merged into AIMCO.  The plaintiffs  sought  monetary
damages and equitable relief, including judicial dissolution of the Partnership.
In addition, during the third quarter of 2001, a complaint (the "Heller action")
was filed  against  the same  defendants  that are named in the  Nuanes  action,
captioned  Heller v.  Insignia  Financial  Group.  On or about  August 6,  2001,
plaintiffs filed a first amended  complaint.  The Heller action was brought as a
purported derivative action, and asserted claims for, among other things, breach
of fiduciary  duty,  unfair  competition,  conversion,  unjust  enrichment,  and
judicial dissolution.

On January 8, 2003,  the parties filed a  Stipulation  of Settlement in proposed
settlement  of the Nuanes  action and the Heller  action.  The  settlement  only
benefits limited partners as of December 20, 2002 in those limited  partnerships
named in the complaint  that are not in the process of being  liquidated or that
have already been  liquidated.  The  Partnership's  limited partners will not be
entitled to any proceeds from the  settlement  since the  Partnership  is in the
process of being liquidated,  but have not compromised any potential claims as a
result of the settlement  and  dismissal.  The  Partnership's  limited  partners
should have received a Notice to  Non-Settling  Persons  during April 2003 which
describes this information in more detail.

On June 13, 2003, the Court granted final approval of the settlement and entered
judgment in both the Nuanes and Heller actions.  On August 12, 2003, an objector
filed an appeal  seeking  to vacate  and/or  reverse  the  order  approving  the
settlement and entering judgment  thereto.  The Managing General Partner intends
to file a respondent's  brief in support of the order  approving  settlement and
entering judgment thereto.

The  Managing  General  Partner  does  not  anticipate  that  any  costs  to the
Partnership, whether legal or settlement costs, associated with these cases will
be material to the Partnership's overall operations.

ITEM 2.     EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

            a) Exhibits:

                  Exhibit 3, Agreement of Limited  Partnership,  incorporated by
                  reference to Exhibit A to the  Prospectus  of the  Partnership
                  dated July 1, 1985 and thereafter  supplemented,  contained in
                  the  Partnership's  Registration  Statement on Form S-11 (Reg.
                  No. 2-96389).

                  Exhibit 31.1,  Certification  of equivalent of Chief Executive
                  Officer   pursuant   to   Securities    Exchange   Act   Rules
                  13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the
                  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

                  Exhibit 31.2,  Certification  of equivalent of Chief Financial
                  Officer   pursuant   to   Securities    Exchange   Act   Rules
                  13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the
                  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

                  Exhibit  32.1,  Certification  Pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.  Section
                  1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
                  Act of 2002.

            b) Reports on Form 8-K:

                  None filed during the quarter ended September 30, 2003.


<PAGE>


                                   SIGNATURES



In accordance with the  requirements of the Exchange Act, the Registrant  caused
this  report to be  signed on its  behalf  by the  undersigned,  thereunto  duly
authorized.



                                    CENTURY PENSION INCOME FUND XXIII


                                    By:   FOX PARTNERS V
                                          Its General Partner


                                    By:   FOX CAPITAL MANAGEMENT CORPORATION
                                          Its Managing General Partner


                                    By:   /s/Patrick J. Foye
                                          Patrick J. Foye
                                          Executive Vice President


                                    By:   /s/Paul J. McAuliffe
                                          Paul J. McAuliffe
                                          Executive Vice President
                                          and Chief Financial Officer


                                    Date: November 12, 2003



<PAGE>



Exhibit 31.1


                                  CERTIFICATION


I, Patrick J. Foye, certify that:


1.    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Century Properties
      Income Fund XXIII;

2.    Based on my knowledge,  this report does not contain any untrue  statement
      of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the
      statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
      were made,  not  misleading  with  respect  to the period  covered by this
      report;

3.    Based on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and other  financial
      information  included  in this  report,  fairly  present  in all  material
      respects the financial condition,  results of operations and cash flows of
      the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.    The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer(s) and I are responsible for
      establishing  and  maintaining  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  (as
      defined in Exchange Act Rules  13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
      and have:

      (a)   Designed such  disclosure  controls and  procedures,  or caused such
            disclosure   controls  and  procedures  to  be  designed  under  our
            supervision,  to ensure that  material  information  relating to the
            registrant,  including its consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known
            to us by others  within  those  entities,  particularly  during  the
            period in which this report is being prepared;

      (b)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure controls
            and  procedures and presented in this report our  conclusions  about
            the effectiveness of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of
            the  end  of the  period  covered  by  this  report  based  on  such
            evaluation; and

      (c)   Disclosed  in this  report any change in the  registrant's  internal
            control  over   financial   reporting   that  occurred   during  the
            registrant's  most recent fiscal  quarter (the  registrant's  fourth
            fiscal  quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
            affected,   or  is  reasonably  likely  to  materially  affect,  the
            registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.    The registrant's other certifying  officer(s) and I have disclosed,  based
      on  our  most  recent   evaluation  of  internal  control  over  financial
      reporting,  to the  registrant's  auditors and the audit  committee of the
      registrant's  board of directors  (or persons  performing  the  equivalent
      functions):

      (a)   All significant  deficiencies and material  weaknesses in the design
            or operation of internal control over financial  reporting which are
            reasonably  likely to adversely affect the  registrant's  ability to
            record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

      (b)   Any fraud,  whether or not  material,  that  involves  management or
            other  employees  who have a  significant  role in the  registrant's
            internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  November 12, 2003

                                    /s/Patrick J. Foye
                                    Patrick J. Foye
                                    Executive  Vice  President  of  Fox  Capital
                                    Management  Corporation,  equivalent  of the
                                    chief executive officer of the Partnership


<PAGE>



Exhibit 31.2


                                  CERTIFICATION


I, Paul J. McAuliffe, certify that:


1.    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Century Properties
      Income Fund XXIII;

2.    Based on my knowledge,  this report does not contain any untrue  statement
      of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the
      statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
      were made,  not  misleading  with  respect  to the period  covered by this
      report;

3.    Based on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and other  financial
      information  included  in this  report,  fairly  present  in all  material
      respects the financial condition,  results of operations and cash flows of
      the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.    The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer(s) and I are responsible for
      establishing  and  maintaining  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  (as
      defined in Exchange Act Rules  13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
      and have:

      (a)   Designed such  disclosure  controls and  procedures,  or caused such
            disclosure   controls  and  procedures  to  be  designed  under  our
            supervision,  to ensure that  material  information  relating to the
            registrant,  including its consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known
            to us by others  within  those  entities,  particularly  during  the
            period in which this report is being prepared;

      (b)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure controls
            and  procedures and presented in this report our  conclusions  about
            the effectiveness of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of
            the  end  of the  period  covered  by  this  report  based  on  such
            evaluation; and

      (c)   Disclosed  in this  report any change in the  registrant's  internal
            control  over   financial   reporting   that  occurred   during  the
            registrant's  most recent fiscal  quarter (the  registrant's  fourth
            fiscal  quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
            affected,   or  is  reasonably  likely  to  materially  affect,  the
            registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.    The registrant's other certifying  officer(s) and I have disclosed,  based
      on  our  most  recent   evaluation  of  internal  control  over  financial
      reporting,  to the  registrant's  auditors and the audit  committee of the
      registrant's  board of directors  (or persons  performing  the  equivalent
      functions):

      (a)   All significant  deficiencies and material  weaknesses in the design
            or operation of internal control over financial  reporting which are
            reasonably  likely to adversely affect the  registrant's  ability to
            record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

      (b)   Any fraud,  whether or not  material,  that  involves  management or
            other  employees  who have a  significant  role in the  registrant's
            internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  November 12, 2003

                                /s/Paul J. McAuliffe
                                Paul J. McAuliffe
                                Executive  Vice  President  and Chief  Financial
                                Officer of Fox Capital Management Corporation,
                                equivalent of the chief financial officer of
                                the Partnership


<PAGE>


Exhibit 32.1


                          Certification of CEO and CFO
                       Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             As Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In  connection  with the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB of Century  Properties
Income Fund XXIII (the "Partnership"),  for the quarterly period ended September
30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the  "Report"),  Patrick  J. Foye,  as the  equivalent  of the chief  executive
officer of the  Partnership,  and Paul J.  McAuliffe,  as the  equivalent of the
chief financial officer of the Partnership,  each hereby certifies,  pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Partnership.


                                           /s/ Patrick J. Foye
                                    Name:  Patrick J. Foye
                                    Date:  November 12, 2003


                                           /s/Paul J. McAuliffe
                                    Name:  Paul J. McAuliffe
                                    Date:  November 12, 2003


This  certification is furnished with this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Partnership for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.