alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
PGI 247.271-3 Solicitation provisions, schedule formats, and contract clauses.       (c)  DTR 4500.9-R, Defense Transportation Regulation, Part IV, Appendix G-3 (available at http://www.transcom.mil/dtr/part-iv/dtr-part-4-app-g3.pdf), contains guidance on schedules as follows:          Schedule I Outbound Services, Pages 6-12.          Schedule II Inbound Services, Pages 13-17.          Schedule III Intra-City and Intra-Area Moves, Page 18.          (1)  *Demurrage and detention charges*.          (i)  Carrier demurrage/detention is a charge made against a consignor (shipper) or consignee (receiver) for the extended use of carrier-furnished equipment when delays attributable to the consignor or consignee occur.  Carrier demurrage/detention rules usually allow a period of free time for loading, unloading, or holding equipment.          (ii)  Carrier-published demurrage/detention rules and charges are not uniform from one carrier to another.  Contracting officers should specifically address them in the contract.  While demurrage/detention rules are published in individual carrier tariffs or agency tenders, Contracting Officers may negotiate contract-specific demurrage/detention rules and charges independent of any existing tariffs or tenders.          (6)  Process any modification of schedule format, other than those authorized in paragraph (c) of this subsection, as a request for deviation to the Commander, SDDC.    **Parent topic:** PGI 247.271 RESERVED
#### § 5.540 Advertising.

A recipient shall not in any advertising related to employment indicate preference, limitation, specification, or discrimination based on sex unless sex is a bona fide occupational qualification for the particular job in question.
#### KIRSHMAN, Respondent, v. CRAWFORD-PLUMMER Co., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

June 19, 1914.)

Action by Harry Kirshman, doing business as Kirshman Bros., against the Crawford-Plummer Company.

A. G. McLaughlin, of New York City for appellant.

H. A. Friedman, of New York City, for respondent.

No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Order filed.
NotesFAQContact Us

Collection

Thesaurus
AdvancedSearch Tips

Collection

Thesaurus
BrowseThesaurus

 Download full text

**ERIC Number:**

**Record Type:**

**Publication Date:**

**Pages:**

**Abstractor:**

**ISBN:**

**ISSN:**

**EISSN:**

Constructivism (Learning)Elementary Secondary EducationInquiryLanguage AcquisitionLearning ProcessesModelsProblem Based LearningTeacher RoleTheory Practice Relationship

**Publication Type:**

**Education Level:**

**Audience:**

**Language:**

**Sponsor:**

**Authoring Institution:**

**Grant or Contract Numbers:**

PrivacyCopyrightContact UsSelection PolicyAPI
JournalsNon-JournalsDownloadSubmitMultimediaWidget
IV 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 155

Requiring the House of Representatives to take any legislative action necessary to verify the ratification of the Equal Rights Amendment as 

part of the Constitution when the legislatures of an additional three 

States ratify the Equal Rights Amendment. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 15, 2005

Mr. ANDREWS (for himself, Mrs. MALONEY, Mr. PAYNE, Ms. LEE, Mr. HOLT, 

Mr. GRIJALVA, Mr. LANTOS, Ms. WOOLSEY, Mr. OWENS, Mr. MCNULTY, 

Mr. VAN HOLLEN, Ms. MCKINNEY, Ms. SCHAKOWSKY, and Mr. 

CUMMINGS) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION

Requiring the House of Representatives to take any legislative action necessary to verify the ratification of the 

Equal Rights Amendment as part of the Constitution 

when the legislatures of an additional three States ratify 

the Equal Rights Amendment.

1 Resolved, That, when the legislatures of an additional 

2 three States ratify the Equal Rights Amendment, the 

3 House of Representatives shall take any legislative action 

4 necessary to verify the ratification of the Equal Rights 

5 Amendment as part of the Constitution.

Æ
The following case has been returned to the regular docket pursuant to S.Ct-Prac.R. XIV(6)(E):

2007-2213.

#### Fife v. Greene Cty. Bd. of Revision.

Board of Tax Appeals, No. 2006-V-783.
§ 490.706 Procedure for modifying the biodiesel component percentage. ( a ) DOE may, by rule, lower the 20 percent biodiesel volume requirement of this subpart for reasons related to cold start, safety, or vehicle function considerations.
( b ) Any person may use the procedures in section 490.6 of this part to petition DOE for a rulemaking to lower the biodiesel volume percentage. A petitioner should include any data or information that it wants DOE to consider in deciding whether or not to begin a rulemaking.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           1,557
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      865
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (98)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                          33,686
<DEPRECIATION>                                (25,995)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  10,624
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       9,350
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    10,624
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,153
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,474
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    10
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    356
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                356
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       356
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.03


</TABLE>
§ 25.39 Criminal penalties. ( a ) Section 223 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, provides for criminal sanctions for willful violation of, attempted violation of, or conspiracy to violate, any regulation issued under sections 161b, 161i, or 161o of the Act. For purposes of section 223, all the regulations in part 25 are issued under one or more of sections 161b, 161i, or 161o, except for the sections listed in paragraph (b) of this section.
( b ) The regulations in part 25 that are not issued under sections 161b, 161i, or 161o for the purposes of section 223 are as follows: §§ 25.1, 25.3, 25.5, 25.7, 25.8, 25.9, 25.11, 25.19, 25.25, 25.27, 25.29, 25.31, 25.37, and 25.39.
[57 FR 55072, Nov. 24, 1992]
#### David DeCayette, Appellant, v State of New York, Respondent.

[817 NYS2d 317]

In a claim to recover damages for personal injuries, the claimant appeals from (1) a decision of the Court of Claims (Scuccimarra, J.), dated April 25, 2005, made after a trial on the issue of liability, and (2) a judgment of the same court entered May 20, 2005, which, upon the decision, dismissed the claim.

Ordered that the appeal from the decision is dismissed, as no appeal lies from a decision *(see Schicchi v J.A. Green Constr. Corp.,*100 AD2d 509 [1984]); and it is further,

Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the facts, with costs, the claim is reinstated, and the matter is remitted to the Court of Claims for a new trial, with costs to abide the event.

The claimant, an inmate in the custody of the Department of Correction (hereinafter DOC), alleges he was injured in a motor vehicle accident that occurred on May 7, 2002 while he was being transported in a DOC bus. The bus was being operated by a correction officer employed by the defendant, State of New York, when it collided with a parked car while being backed out of a parking area at the Ossining Correctional Facility. The Court of Claims held, after a trial on the issue of liability, that the claimant failed to establish that the State breached any duty of care owed to him. We disagree.

The conclusion reached by the Court of Claims cannot be supported by the evidence. The record demonstrates that the driver of the DOC bus was negligent in backing his vehicle into a parked car without taking adequate precautions. However, a new trial is required because under the circumstances there is an issue as to whether the driver’s negligence was a proximate cause of the appellant’s injuries *(cf. Soto v New York City Tr. Auth.,*295 AD2d 419 [2002]). Schmidt, J.P., Krausman, Spolzino *935and Fisher, JJ., concur. *[See*7 Misc 3d 1030(A), 2005 NY Slip Op 50820(U) (2005).]
EXHIBIT
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I, Leslie
J. Kessler, Chief Executive Officer of Water Chef, Inc., hereby certify that the
Form 10-Q of Water Chef, Inc. for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2008 fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in such report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Water Chef, Inc.





Date:  August
      18, 2008
            /s/
      Leslie J. KesslerLeslie
      J. KesslerPresident
      and Chief Executive Officer







This
certification is being furnished pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 and, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, shall
not be deemed to be filed as part of the periodic report described herein nor
shall it be deemed filed by Water Chef, Inc. for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
January 26

, 2015

Mr. James H. Williams

Unmanned Aircraft Systems Integration Office, AFS

- 80

800 Independence Ave., S.W. Washington, D.C. 2 0591

Dear Mr. Williams:

Enclosed please find an exemption application filed on behalf of Douglas R. Dorrer under

Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 and 14 C.F.R. Part 11 to

allow commercial operations of a small unmanned aircraft system for community outreach,

aerial surveying of real property, and not

- for

- profit search and rescue operations.

Should your staff have any questions, please contact the undersigned.

Respectfully,

Douglas R. Dorrer, MBA, Pro Se

204 E. Main Street

Clarksburg, Wv 26301

(304) 629

- 7077
#### § 501.69 Judicial review.

Any person aggrieved by any order issued by OFE under this subpart, must file, within sixty (60) days of publication of the final order in the Federal Register, a petition for judicial review in the United States Court of Appeals for the Circuit wherein he resides, or has his principal place of business. Exhaustion of administrative remedies for purposes of judicial review does not require filing a petition pursuant to subpart G for modification or rescission of the order to be reviewed.
#### § 460.204 Mechanical ventilation fan efficacy.

(a) Whole-house mechanical ventilation system fans must meet the minimum efficacy requirements set forth in table 1 to [460.204(a)](/on/2024-09-17/title-10/section-460.204#p-460.204(a)), except as provided in [paragraph (b)](/on/2024-09-17/title-10/section-460.204#p-460.204(b)) of this section. The mechanical ventilation fan efficacy requirements are adapted from section R403 of the 2021 IECC.

Table 1 to [§ 460.204](/on/2024-09-17/title-10/section-460.204)(a)—Mechanical Ventilation System Fan Efficacy

| Fan type description | Airflow rate minimum (cfm) | Minimum efficacy (cfm/watt) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Heat recovery ventilator or energy recovery ventilator | Any | 1.2 |
| In-line supply or exhaust fans | Any | 3.8 |
| Other exhaust fan | <90 | 2.8 |
| Other exhaust fan | ≥90 | 3.5 |

(b) Mechanical ventilation fans that are integral to heating, ventilating, and air conditioning equipment, including furnace fans as defined in [§ 430.2 of this subchapter](/on/2024-09-17/title-10/section-430.2), are not subject to the efficiency requirements in [paragraph (a)](/on/2024-09-17/title-10/section-460.204#p-460.204(a)) of this section.
Academy of Model Aeronautics 

5161 East Memorial Drive 

Muncie, Indiana 47302 

(765) 287-1256 – Business 

(765) 289-4248 – Fax 

(800) 435-9262 – Membership Services 

http://www.modelaircraft.org

FLYING SITE SAFETY AND 

OPERATIONAL RULES 

The Official AMA National Model Aircraft Safety Code is a 

basic document for ALL AMA chartered clubs. Every member 

should be familiar with the Safety Code, and new members should 

receive instruction about this code. 

Each club should also develop a carefully structured set of 

rules for their club’s flying site. These rules should cover two (2) 

areas: 

1) Safety rules for actual flying, and 

2) Operational rules which include items concerning 

 times of operation, permits required, emergency 

 numbers, etc. 

Following is a generic sample of a set of rules designed to 

supplement the required current Official AMA National Model 

Aircraft Safety Code. This example is not intended to represent the 

specific needs of all flying sites. It is, rather, intended to be a guide 

to help each club develop rules which specifically meet the 

individual site situation. 

C:\PDF\535-B.doc 03/2008 IM 
FLYING SITE SAFETY RULES 

1. Deliberate flying behind the safety line is prohibited. 

2. Each transmitter must display frequency identification. 

3. Taxiing is not allowed in the pit area. 

4. It is strongly recommended that members do not fly alone. 

5. Children should not be permitted beyond the spectator area unless under the direct 

supervision of an adult or under flight instruction. 

6. The established club frequency control plan will be in force at all times. 

7. Control line equipment shall be inspected before the initial flight each day. 

8. Helicopter flights are allowed in designated areas only. 

9. Sailplane high start lines are to run parallel to active runway. 

10. Direction of flight is determined by the wind direction, etc. 

11. Flight operations will stop during electrical storms. 

12. Models will fly only in predesignated areas, and will yield right-of-way to full-size 

aircraft. 

FLYING SITE OPERATIONAL RULES 

1. NO flying before 9:00 a.m. 

2. Only pilots and assistants are allowed on the safety line. 

3. Mufflers are required on all models. (db limit recommended). 

4. Testing of engines is to be performed in specific designated areas. 

5. Shelter may not be used as a pit area. 

6. The AMA Safety Code will be displayed when the field is open for flying. 

7. Fliers operating models must display AMA membership cards for easy identification. 

8. Pilots shall make appropriate announcement when taking off, landing, or emergency 

situations. 

9. Compliance to these safety rules is the responsibility of each participant. 

10. First aid kits are to be carried by designated members. 

11. Post emergency numbers: Hospital _______________________________, 

Police _______________________, and Public phone location _____________________ 

12. All non-participants must be behind a partial barrier during Control Line Speed flying. 

C:\PDF\535-B.doc 03/2008 IM
89–008

106TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 2d Session 106–999

WAIVING POINTS OF ORDER AGAINST THE CONFERENCE REPORT TO ACCOMPANY H.R. 4811, THE FOREIGN OPERATIONS, EXPORT FINANCING,

AND RELATED PROGRAMS APPROPRIATIONS ACT, 2001

OCTOBER 24, 2000.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed

Mr. DIAZ-BALART, from the Committee on Rules,

submitted the following

REPORT

[To accompany H. Res. 647]

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House

Resolution 647, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to the House

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted.

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF RESOLUTION

The resolution waives all points of order against the conference

report to accompany H.R. 4811, the Foreign Operations, Export Financing, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2001, and

against its consideration. The rule further provides that the conference report shall be considered as read.

Æ
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-16-0000410

27-JAN-2020

07:46 AM
August 31, 2015

Dear Mr. Barber:

This letter is to inform y ou that the following informati on is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA-2015-0811). This informati on is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

 Provide a copy of the Motion Picture a nd Television Operations Manual (MPTOM) which is required by Order 8900.1, Volume 3, Chapter 8, Section 1. If you wish for us to proceed without this manual and remove clos ed-set filming from your proposed operation please inform of us of your intention by the requested response date listed below.

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit any proprietary information to the FAA Headquarters or electronically via email to 333exemptions@faa.gov. If you want us to process your request any further, we must receive the information desc ribed above by 9/4/15. If we do not receive the information, we will close the doc ket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-4712.

Sincerely,

/s/
Brenda Robeson Program Analyst
Comment Info: =================

General Comment:FAA-2011-0264


X-Ref AD 2008-03-04
Exhibit 10.1





Exhibit 10.1




Summary of Base Salaries

for

Executive Officers of Park National Corporation




On February 12, 2010, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of Park National
Corporation (“Park”) approved the base salaries for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2010, for
each of the executive officers of Park: (a) C. Daniel DeLawder, Chairman of the Board and Chief
Executive Officer of Park and The Park National Bank, a subsidiary of Park; (b) David L. Trautman,
President and Secretary of Park and President of The Park National Bank; and (c) John W. Kozak,
Chief Financial Officer of Park and Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of The Park
National Bank. Those base salaries are:




	 	*	 	C. Daniel DeLawder — $773,525
	 
	 	*	 	David L. Trautman — $563,250
	 
	 	*	 	John W. Kozak — $414,455
NG NUMBER

70

Matiniens fe |

INTERVAL 10 METERS

WITH SUPPLEMENTARY 2 METER CONTOURS

BATHYMETRIC — CONTOUR

DATUM IS MEAN LOW WATER

ui
=

BATH NE.

ATIMICAS
#### In the Matter of Brice L. and Others, Infants. Suffolk County Department of Social Services, Respondent; Brice L., Appellant.

[815 NYS2d 273]

In a child protective proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, the father appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of fact-finding and disposition of the Family Court, Suffolk County (Simeone, J.), dated November 15, 2004, as, after a fact-finding hearing, found that he had neglected the subject children.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the father’s contention, the petitioner established a prima facie case that he neglected the subject children by failing to provide proper supervision and guardianship on several occasions which placed the subject children in imminent risk of harm and resulted in actual harm to one of the children *(see*Family Ct Act § 1012 [f] [i] [B]; *Nicholson v Scoppetta,*3 NY3d 357, 368 [2004]). Based upon our review of the record and deferring to the Family Court’s resolution of credibility issues *(see Matter of Irene O.,*38 NY2d 776 [1975]; *Matter of Sylvia J.,*23 AD3d 560, 562 [2005]; *Commissioner of Social Servs. of City of N.Y. v Clifton F.,*207 AD2d 836, 837 [1994]), we conclude that the Family Court’s determination that the father neglected the *911subject children is supported by a preponderance of the evidence *(see Matter of James HH.,*234 AD2d 783 [1996]; *see also Matter of Brown v Johnson,*294 AD2d 241 [2002]).

The Family Court providently exercised its discretion in adding a new allegation of neglect by granting the petitioner’s motion for leave to amend the petition to conform to the proof concerning an incident that occurred after the filing of the original petition *(see*Family Ct Act § 1051 [b]; *Matter of Michelle S.,*195 AD2d 721 [1993]; *Matter of Shawniece E.,*110 AD2d 900 [1985]). Contrary to the father’s contention, the petitioner was not precluded from seeking leave to amend the petition on the basis of a report made to the State Central Register concerning the recent incident since the caseworker testified that the report had been investigated by Child Protective Services and was approved to be “indicated” *(see*Family Ct Act § 1046 [a] [v]; *cf*Social Services Law §§ 412 [12], 422 [5] [b]; *cf. Matter of Joseph T.,*23 AD3d 482 [2005]; *Matter of Diane P.,*110 AD2d 354 [1985]).

The father’s remaining contention is without merit. Schmidt, J.P., Krausman, Spolzino and Fisher, JJ, concur.
#### § 21.4 Interpretations.

Except as specifically authorized by the Commission in writing, no interpretation of the meaning of the regulations in this part by any officer or employee of the Commission other than a written interpretation by the General Counsel will be recognized to be binding upon the Commission.
#### § 5.100 Purpose and effective date.

The purpose of these Title IX regulations is to effectuate Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, as amended (except sections 904 and 906 of those Amendments) (20 U.S.C. 1681, 1682, 1683, 1685, 1686, 1687, 1688), which is designed to eliminate (with certain exceptions) discrimination on the basis of sex in any education program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance, whether or not such program or activity is offered or sponsored by an educational institution as defined in these Title IX regulations. The effective date of these Title IX regulations shall be September 29, 2000.
NotesFAQContact Us

Collection

Thesaurus
AdvancedSearch Tips

Collection

Thesaurus
BrowseThesaurus

 Download full text

**ERIC Number:**

**Record Type:**

**Publication Date:**

**Pages:**

**Abstractor:**

**ISBN:**

**ISSN:**

**EISSN:**

Change AgentsCommunity CollegesDemographyEducational ChangeEducational TechnologyGovernment School RelationshipOrganizational ChangeState LegislationTwo Year Colleges

**Publication Type:**

**Education Level:**

**Audience:**

**Language:**

**Sponsor:**

**Authoring Institution:**

**Grant or Contract Numbers:**

PrivacyCopyrightContact UsSelection PolicyAPI
JournalsNon-JournalsDownloadSubmitMultimediaWidget
#### GETTY, Appellant, v. SCHWAB et al., Respondents.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

July 7, 1914.)

Action by Herbert L. Getty against William Schwab and another.

No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs.
#### In the Matter of the Estate of Frank Gregory, Deceased. Robert Abrams, as Attorney-General of the State of New York, Appellant; Leonard J. Gregorio, as Public Administrator of Westchester County, et al., Respondents.

— In a proceeding to determine the validity of a claim against an estate for services rendered to the deceased, the Attorney-General appeals from an order of the Surrogate’s Court, Westchester County, dated February 1,1980, denying his motion, *inter alia,*to intervene in the proceeding. Order reversed, without costs or disbursements, and motion granted. Under the circumstances of this case and in the exercise of our discretion, the Attorney-General is granted permission to intervene. Hopkins, J. P., Titone, Mangano and Gibbons, JJ., concur.