alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 7254 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow the deduction of 

moving expenses of Federal employees. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 11, 2018 

Mr. HECK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow the 

deduction of moving expenses of Federal employees. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Keeping the Promise 

5 to American Public Servants Act of 2018’’. 

6 SEC. 2. TREATMENT OF MOVING EXPENSES FOR FEDERAL 

7 EMPLOYEES DURING SUSPENSION OF DE8 DUCTION. 

9 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 217 of the Internal Rev10 enue Code of 1986 is amended by redesignating subVerDate Sep 11 2014 21:34 Dec 14, 2018 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H7254.IH H7254

pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 7254 IH

1 sections (j) and (k) as subsections (k) and (l), respectively, 

2 and by inserting after subsection (i) the following new sub3 section: 

4 ‘‘(j) MOVING EXPENSES FOR FEDERAL EMPLOY5 EES.—In the case of moving expenses reimbursed or fur6 nished in kind to an individual— 

7 ‘‘(1) pursuant to chapter 41, or subchapter II 

8 of chapter 57, of title 5, United States Code, and 

9 ‘‘(2) with respect to a move— 

10 ‘‘(A) between a location inside the conti11 nental United States and a location outside the 

12 continental United States, 

13 ‘‘(B) between Alaska and Hawaii, or 

14 ‘‘(C) between Alaska or Hawaii and a loca15 tion outside the continental United States 

16 (other than Alaska or Hawaii), 

17 the limitations under subsection (c) shall not apply, sub18 section (l) shall not apply, and the individual shall be 

19 treated for purposes of this section as commencing work 

20 as an employee at a new principal place of work. For pur21 poses of the preceding sentence, the term ‘continental 

22 United States’ means the several States and the District 

23 of Columbia, but does not include Alaska or Hawaii.’’. 

24 (b) QUALIFIED MOVING EXPENSE REIMBURSE25 MENT.—Section 132(g)(2) of such Code is amended by inVerDate Sep 11 2014 21:34 Dec 14, 2018 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H7254.IH H7254

pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 7254 IH

1 serting ‘‘, or a payment or reimbursement described in 

2 section 217(j) (relating to moving expenses for Federal 

3 employees),’’ after ‘‘change of station,’’. 

4 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

5 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

6 December 31, 2017. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-6430

JARRETT D. HOLDEN,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

HAROLD CLARKE, Director of VA. D.O.C.,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, Senior 

District Judge. (1:13-cv-01591-TSE-MSN)

Submitted: July 1, 2015 Decided: July 15, 2015

Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jarrett D. Holden, Appellant Pro Se. Leah A. Darron, OFFICE OF 

THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Jarrett D. Holden seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. 

The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge 

issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that 

Holden has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny 

a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma 

pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 
3

presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
### Geologic investigations of the 1986 Marryat Creek, Australia, earthquake; implications for paleoseismicity in stable continental regions

By: M. N. MachetteA. J. CroneJ. R. Bowman

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/b2032B

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Plates:                               - **Plate 1**                            (pdf)
  - **Plate 2**                            (pdf) 
-                                 Larger Work: This publication is Chapter                                B of                                                                              Paleoseismological studies in Australia                                                                    
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
SUBCHAPTER E - GENERAL CONTRACTING

REQUIREMENTS

PART 2128 - BONDS AND INSURANCE

PART 2129 - TAXES

PART 2131 - CONTRACT COST PRINCIPLES AND PROCEDURES

PART 2132 - CONTRACT FINANCING

PART 2133 [RESERVED]

PART 2128 - BONDS AND INSURANCE

Subpart 2128.3 - Insurance

2128.370 Contract clause.

PART 2129 - TAXES

Subpart 2129.1 - General

2129.170 Policy.

Subpart 2129.3 - State and Local Taxes

2129.302 Application of State and local taxes to the Government.

2129.305 State and local tax exemptions.

Subpart 2129.4 - Contract Clauses

2129.401 Domestic contracts.

2129.401-70 FEGLI Program contract clauses.

PART 2131 - CONTRACT COST PRINCIPLES AND PROCEDURES

Subpart 2131.1 - Applicability

2131.103 Contracts with commercial organizations.

2131.109 Advance agreements.

Subpart 2131.2 - Contracts With Commercial Organizations

2131.201 General.

2131.201-5 Credits.

2131.203 Indirect costs.

2131.205 Selected costs.

2131.205-1 Public relations and advertising costs.

2131.205-3 Bad debts.

2131.205-6 Compensation for personal services.

2131.205-32 Precontract costs.

2131.205-38 Selling costs.

2131.205-41 Taxes.

2131.205-43 Trade, business, technical and professional activity costs.

2131.205-70 Major subcontractor service charge.

2131.205-71 Reinsurer administrative expense costs.

2131.270 Contract clauses.

PART 2132 - CONTRACT FINANCING

Subpart 2132.1 - General

2132.170 Recurring premium payments to Contractors.

2132.171 Contract clause.

Subpart 2132.6 - Contract Debts

2132.607 Tax credit.

2132.617 Contract clause.

Subpart 2132.7 - Contract Funding
2132.770 Insurance premium payments and special contingency reserve.

2132.771 Non-commingling of FEGLI Program funds.

2132.772 Contract clause.

Subpart 2132.8 - Assignment of Claims

2132.806 Contract clause.

PART 2133 [RESERVED]
159 So.2d 285

#### Michael (S) CHIANTELLA v. MISSISSIPPI MUD, INC.

No. 47022.

Jan. 20, 1964.

In re: Mississippi Mud, Inc., applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition, mandamus and/or injunction. 157 So.2d 279.

Writ refused. On the facts found *by*the Court of Appeal we find no error of law in its judgment.
#### Maritza Karelas, an Infant, by Her Mother, Tulla Karelas, et al., Respondents, v. Steinway Mansion, Defendant, and Hadji Halberian, Appellant.

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the appeal is from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated April 16, 1969, which granted plaintiffs’ motion to remove the action to that court from the Civil Court of the City of New York upon certain conditions. Order modified, on the law and the facts, by adding to the first decretal paragraph thereof a provision that the granting of the motion is further conditioned upon the injured plaintiff’s submitting to a physical examination if such examination is requested by defendant Halberian. As so modified, order affirmed, without costs. In our opinion, the further condition above mentioned should have been included in the order granting plaintiffs’ motion. Beldock, P. J., Brennan, Munder, Martuscello and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.
1205.601 Governmentwide database of

contracts.

(b) The OA HCA is responsible for complying with the requirements of FAR 5.601(b).

Parent topic: Subpart 1205.6—Publicizing Multi-Agency Use Contracts
**Exhibit
      32.2**





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Patient Safety Technologies, Inc. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2005 as
      filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
      I, William B. Horne, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




Date: February
              13, 2006
            By:
            /s/ William
              B. HorneWilliam
              B. HorneTitle: Chief
              Financial Officer
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**
MEMORANDUM OPINION

N o. 04

- 19

- 00295

- CR
Luis Manuel AGUILAR , Appellant

v.
The STATE of Texas, Appellee
From the 175th Judicial District Court , Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2016CR7357W Honorable Catherine Torres

- Stahl , Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice Beth Watkins, Justice Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice
Delivered and Filed: July 3, 2019
DIS MISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION

T he trial court imposed sentence in the underlying cause on October 1, 2018. Because

a

ppellant did not file a motion for new trial, the deadline for filing his notice of appeal was October 31, 2018. See id. R. 26.2(a)(1). A notice of appeal was not filed until May 6, 2019, and appellant did not timely file a motion for extension of time t o file the notice of appeal. 1 See T EX

. R. A PP

. P.
26.3.

1 The clerk’s record contains a pro se motion for leave to file a late notice of appeal. However, it was filed May 6, 2019, well beyond the due date of November 15, 2018. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 26.3 (stating appellate court may extend04

- 19

- 00295

- CR

- 2

- By order dated May 13, 2019, appellant was ordered to show cause in writing by June 12, 2019, why we should not dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Olivo v. State , 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996) (holding that timely notice of appeal is necessary to invoke court of appeals’ jurisdiction). Appellant did not respond to our order. Because appellant’s notice of appeal was untimely filed, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jur isdiction. See id

. PER CURIAM
DO NOT PUBLISH

time to file notice of appeal if within fifteen days after deadline party files notice of appeal and motion to extend time to file notice of appeal).
1242.1503 Procedures.       (a)          (1)  			Each OA is responsible for assigning responsibility and management accountability for the completeness of past performance submissions as required in FAR 42.1503(a).    **Parent topic:** Subpart 1242.15—Contractor Performance Information
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 420 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 420

      Directing the Attorney General to transmit to the House of 
 Representatives not later than 14 days after the date of the adoption 
of this resolution documents in the possession of the Attorney General 
   relating to the disclosure of the identity and employment of Ms. 
                             Valerie Plame.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 29, 2005

  Mr. Holt (for himself, Mr. Inslee, and Mr. Grijalva) submitted the 
   following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the 
                               Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
      Directing the Attorney General to transmit to the House of 
 Representatives not later than 14 days after the date of the adoption 
of this resolution documents in the possession of the Attorney General 
   relating to the disclosure of the identity and employment of Ms. 
                             Valerie Plame.

    Resolved, That the Attorney General is directed to transmit to the 
House of Representatives not later than the date that is 14 days after 
the date of the adoption of this resolution, all documents, including 
telephone and electronic mail records, logs and calendars, personnel 
records, and records of internal discussions in the possession of the 
Attorney General relating to the disclosure of the identity of Ms. 
Valerie Plame as an employee of the Central Intelligence Agency during 
the period beginning on May 6, 2003, and ending on July 31, 2003.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 35.3












ANNUAL STATEMENT AS TO COMPLIANCE

UBS-Barclays Commercial Mortgage Trust
2013-C5

The undersigned, David Co, a Director of Deutsche Bank Trust Company
Americas, as the Certificate Administrator (a “Certifying Servicer”) under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated
as of February 1, 2013 (the “Agreement”), by and among, UBS Commercial Mortgage Securitization Corp., as Depositor,
Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC
Bank, National Association, as Special Servicer, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Trustee, Certificate Administrator, Paying
Agent and Custodian, and Situs Holdings, LLC, as Operating Advisor here by certifies in accordance with Section 10.11 of the Agreement:



| | A) | A review of such Certifying Servicer’s activities from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2016 (the “reporting period”)
and of such Certifying Servicer’s performance under the Agreement has been made under such officer’s supervision and
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | B) | That, as to the best of such officer’s knowledge, based on such review, such Certifying Servicer has fulfilled all its
obligations under the Agreement, in all material respects throughout the reporting period.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS

as Certificate Administrator



/s/ David Co

BY: David Co

Title: Director

Date: March 1, 2017
P.1 

OAR Box 1865 

Prepped by Charmelle Mathews 

Document Number: 

35) IV-E-23 

Docket Number: 

A-83-27 

Printed 12/3/2008 9:15:28 AM Sheet 35 of 105 
P,2_ 

CORPORATION 54-83-27 Tl l _ „ 

IV-E-23 

TELEPHONE CALL REPORT 

DATE: October 23, 1986 

TO: Mr. William Myer 

Branch Head 

Solid and Hazardous Waste Management Branch 

North Carolina Department of Human Resources 

P. 0. Box 2091 

Raleigh, North Carolina 27602 

(919) 733-2178 

FROM: Phillip A. May, Radian Corporation 

SUBJECT: Waste Site Disposal of Sodium Scrubber Effluent 

Mr. Myer stated that presently liquid wastes can not be disposed of in 

North Carolina because of the limited number of lined facilities available. 

There are presently only four lined waste disposal sites in North Carolina. 

Disposal of sodium scrubber waste would have two additional problems 

associated with it: (1) no leachate or soluble material can be disposed of 

because of the ground water regulations (North Carolina has a nondegradation 

policy regarding its ground water), and (2) sodium is known to collapse the 

soil structure. 

Presently, all of the waste disposal sites in the state are publically 

owned landfills paid for by local taxes. The laws are presently being 

changed regarding this the ownership basis, and these changes may be seen as 

soon as July 1987. Under the new laws, privately operated sites will be 

created at which a tipping fee of 15 to 50 $/ton will be charged. 

Progress Center/3200 E. Chapel Hill Rd./Nelson Hwy./P.O. Box 13000/Research Triangle Park. N.C. 27709/(919)541-9100
IV 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 587 

Congratulating Tony Stewart on winning the 2005 NASCAR Nextel Cup 

Championship. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 6, 2005 

Mr. SODREL (for himself, Mr. PENCE, Mr. BURTON of Indiana, Mr. SOUDER, 

Mr. HOSTETTLER, and Ms. CARSON) submitted the following resolution; 

which was referred to the Committee on Government Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Congratulating Tony Stewart on winning the 2005 NASCAR 

Nextel Cup Championship. 

Whereas Tony Stewart won NASCAR’s Nextel Cup Championship in 2005, the 57th season of NASCAR’s premier 

series; 

Whereas Stewart finished with an amazing 6,533 points, the 

most for any driver in the 2005 NASCAR series; 

Whereas Stewart in the 2005 series won 3 starting pole positions, had 5 wins, 17 top 5 finishes, and 25 top 10 finishes; 

Whereas Stewart also won the Gatorade Duel 2, the Dodge/ 

Save Mart 350, the Pepsi 400, the New England 300, 

and the Sirius Satellite Radio at the Glen; 
2 

•HRES 587 IH 

Whereas Stewart’s #20 car started in 22nd position, led the 

most laps, and also finished first in the Allstate 400 at 

the Brickyard, continuing Hoosier dominance at the Indianapolis Motor Speedway’s only NASCAR Nextel Cup 

race; 

Whereas Stewart is the recipient of Indiana’s highest honor, 

the Sagamore of the Wabash, which was awarded to him 

by Governor Mitch Daniels on August 29, 2005, after 

Stewart won the Allstate 400 at the Brickyard; 

Whereas Stewart has won 2 NASCAR Nextel Cup Championships in only his 7th year in the NASCAR circuit; 

Whereas Stewart has won 8 other auto racing championships 

in his career including the Indy Racing League; 

Whereas Stewart has ranked in the top 10 every season since 

his 1999 rookie year and has never ranked lower than 

7th in the final point standings; and 

Whereas Stewart, who began racing in Indiana and excelled 

at a very young age, was born in Columbus, Indiana, and 

continues to have close ties with the State of Indiana and 

the City of Columbus: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives con2 gratulates Tony Stewart for winning the 2005 NASCAR 

3 Nextel Cup Championship. 

Æ
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Otes Gileseria Rodriguez, Appellant.

Order unanimously reversed and matter remitted to Erie County Court for a hearing. Memorandum: Petitioner’s allegations that his plea of guilty was coerced by threats made to him by an Assistant District Attorney and his own counsel are sufficient to raise a triable issue as to the voluntariness of his plea, which should be resolved at a hearing. *(People*v. *Picciotti,*4 N Y 2d 340, 345.) (Appeal from order of Erie County *732Court denying, without a hearing, motion to vacate judgment of conviction for manslaughter, first degree, rendered June 28, 1967.) Present — Del Vecchio, J. P., Marsh, Gabrielli, Moule and Henry, JJ.
**REGULATORY EVALUATION**

**Directorate Identifier:**

___ 2013

_______ - NM -

_____ 242

_____ - AD **Executive Order 12866:** Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:** Is the AD significan t? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Regulatory Flexibility Act:** Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:** This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? YES ( ) explain NO (X)
#### § 431.407 Confidentiality—Electric Motors.

Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 1004.11, any manufacturer or private labeler of electric motors submitting information or data which they believe to be confidential and exempt from public disclosure should submit one complete copy, and 15 copies from which the information believed to be confidential has been deleted. In accordance with the procedures established at 10 CFR 1004.11, the Department shall make its own determination with regard to any claim that information submitted be exempt from public disclosure.

[76 FR 12505, Mar. 7, 2011]