alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 20.1401 General provisions and scope. ( a ) The criteria in this subpart apply to the decommissioning of facilities licensed under parts 30, 40, 50, 52, 60, 61, 63, 70, and 72 of this chapter, and release of part of a facility or site for unrestricted use in accordance with § 50.83 of this chapter, as well as other facilities subject to the Commission's jurisdiction under the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, and the Energy Reorganization Act of 1974, as amended. For high-level and low-level waste disposal facilities (10 CFR parts 60, 61, and 63), the criteria apply only to ancillary surface facilities that support radioactive waste disposal activities. The criteria do not apply to uranium and thorium recovery facilities already subject to appendix A to 10 CFR part 40 or the uranium solution extraction facilities.
( b ) The criteria in this subpart do not apply to sites which: ( 1 ) Have been decommissioned prior to the effective date of the rule in accordance with criteria identified in the Site Decommissioning Management Plan (SDMP) Action Plan of April 16, 1992 (57 FR 13389);
( 2 ) Have previously submitted and received Commission approval on a license termination plan (LTP) or decommissioning plan that is compatible with the SDMP Action Plan criteria; or
( 3 ) Submit a sufficient LTP or decommissioning plan before August 20, 1998 and such LTP or decommissioning plan is approved by the Commission before August 20, 1999 and in accordance with the criteria identified in the SDMP Action Plan, except that if an EIS is required in the submittal, there will be a provision for day-for-day extension.
( c ) After a site has been decommissioned and the license terminated in accordance with the criteria in this subpart, or after part of a facility or site has been released for unrestricted use in accordance with § 50.83 of this chapter and in accordance with the criteria in this subpart, the Commission will require additional cleanup only, if based on new information, it determines that the criteria of this subpart were not met and residual radioactivity remaining at the site could result in significant threat to public health and safety.
( d ) When calculating TEDE to the average member of the critical group the licensee shall determine the peak annual TEDE dose expected within the first 1000 years after decommissioning.
[62 FR 39088, July 21, 1997, as amended at 66 FR 55789, Nov. 2, 2001; 68 FR 19726, Apr. 22, 2003; 72 FR 49485, Aug. 28, 2007]
##### 



Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) UNDER THE EXCHANGE ACT I, James Benenson, Jr., the Chief Executive Officer of B.H.I.T. Inc., certify
that:  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of B.H.I.T. Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
and we have:  a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
to ensure that material information relating to the registrant is made
known to us by others, particularly during the period in which this
report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in
the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal
control over financial reporting; and  5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board
of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial data; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting. Date: November 5, 2004
    
    By:
    
    /s/ James Benenson, Jr.James Benenson, Jr.President and Chief Executive Officer
Case 2:06-cv-00766-MHT-TFM Document 73 Filed 07/09/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:06-cv-00766-MHT-TFM Document 73 Filed 07/09/2007 Page 2 of 2
PGI 205.207 Preparation and transmittal of synopses.       (a)(i) *Notice numbering*.          (1) For a particular procurement, when submitting notices at different stages of the acquisition (i.e., sources sought notice, pre-solicitation notice, award notice), ensure the solicitation number is entered exactly the same way in order to allow all to be retrieved when a search is performed.          (2) Use only alpha-numeric characters in the solicitation and award number data elements in the GPE. Do not include hyphens, slashes, or other special characters.          (d) *Special notices for small business events*. When advertising an event for small businesses, post a 'special notice' notice type and ensure the "title" data field begins with "Small Business Event". This will enable the public to easily search the GPE using the small business event calendar on the website.    **Parent topic:** PGI 205.2 -SYNOPSES OF PROPOSED CONTRACT ACTIONS
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1056 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1056

       Recognizing the celebration of the Hmong New Year in 2018.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 7, 2018

  Mr. Grothman (for himself, Mr. Pocan, Mr. Gallagher, Ms. Moore, Ms. 
     McCollum, Mr. Duffy, and Mr. Vargas) submitted the following 
   resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and 
                           Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
       Recognizing the celebration of the Hmong New Year in 2018.

Whereas the Hmong New Year is traditionally celebrated at the end of the rice 
        harvest season in Laos and Southeast Asia in late November or early 
        December;
Whereas the Hmong New Year traditionally spans multiple days, with each village 
        starting and ending the New Year on a different date to allow other 
        villages to come, support, and visit each other;
Whereas the Hmong New Year is traditionally a time to give thanks to ancestral 
        spirits and visit other villages;
Whereas Hmong New Year celebrations traditionally include song, dance, food, and 
        courtship games for youth, including pov pob, a ball-throwing game;
Whereas Hmong Americans across the United States celebrate the New Year on 
        weekends from October to December; and
Whereas Hmong New Year celebrations are a significant cultural tradition in many 
        communities across the United States: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) recognizes the cultural and historical significance of 
        the Hmong New Year;
            (2) expresses the deepest respect for Hmong Americans 
        celebrating this occasion; and
            (3) wishes Hmong Americans and all individuals who observe 
        this holiday a happy new year.
                                 <all>
```
H. Res. 335

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

December 9 (legislative day, December 8), 2006.

Whereas epidermolysis bullosa is a rare disease characterized 

by the presence of extremely fragile skin that results in 

the development of recurrent, painful blisters, open sores, 

and in some forms of the disease, in disfiguring scars, 

disabling musculoskeletal deformities, and internal blistering; 

Whereas approximately 12,500 individuals in the United 

States are affected by the disease; 

Whereas data from the National Epidermolysis Bullosa Registry indicates that of every one million live births, 20 infants are born with the disease; 

Whereas there currently is no cure for the disease; 

Whereas children with the disease require almost around-theclock care; 

Whereas approximately 90 percent of individuals with 

epidermolysis bullosa report experiencing pain on an average day; 

Whereas the skin is so fragile for individuals with the disease 

that even minor rubbing and day-to-day activity may 

cause blistering, including from activities such as writing, 

eating, walking, and from the seams on their clothes; 
2

•HRES 335 EH 

Whereas most individuals with the disease have inherited the 

disease through genes they receive from one or both parents; 

Whereas epidermolysis bullosa is so rare that many health 

care practitioners have never heard of it or seen a patient 

with it; 

Whereas individuals with epidermolysis bullosa often feel isolated because of the lack of knowledge in the Nation 

about the disease and the impact that it has on the body; 

Whereas more funds should be dedicated toward research to 

develop treatments and eventually a cure for the disease; 

and 

Whereas the last week of October would be an appropriate 

time to recognize National Epidermolysis Bullosa Week 

in order to raise public awareness about the prevalence 

of epidermolysis bullosa, the impact it has on families, 

and the need for additional research into a cure for the 

disease: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

(1) supports the goals and ideals of a National 

Epidermolysis Bullosa Awareness Week to raise public 

awareness and understanding of epidermolysis bullosa; 

(2) recognizes the need for a cure for the disease; 

and 

(3) encourages the people of the United States and 

interested groups to support the week through appropriate ceremonies and activities to promote public awareness of epidermolysis bullosa and to foster under-
3

•HRES 335 EH 

standing of the impact of the disease on patients and 

their families. 

Attest:

Clerk.
#### Davis Aircraft Products Co., Inc., Respondent, v. Bankers Trust Company, Appellant.

In an action to recover moneys charged against plaintiff’s account maintained with the defendant bank, the appeal is from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated December 9, 1968, which denied defendant’s motion to change the place of trial from Suffolk County to New York County and granted plaintiff’s cross motion to retain the venue in Suffolk County for the convenience of witnesses and in the interests of justice. Order reversed, .on the law and the facts, with $10 costs and disbursements; and defendant’s motion granted and plaintiff’s cross motion denied. Plaintiff and defendant are corporate parties whose principal places of business, as set forth in their respective certificates of incorporation, are in New York County. Plaintiff did not have a right to commence this action in Suffolk County even though it is physically, located there. For venue purposes a corporation is a *833resident of the county set forth in its certificate of incorporation as its principal place of business. Defendant thus had a right to have the venue of the action changed (CPLR 503, subd. [c], 510, 511; *Bryan*v. *Hagemann,*31 A D 2d 905; *Wegorzewski*v. *Macrose Lbr. & Trim Co.,*28 A D 2d 713; *General Precision*v. *Ametek, Inc.,*24 A D 2d 757). Though a court may retain jurisdiction in an originally improper county for the convenience of witnesses (see 2 Weinstein-Korn-Miller, N. Y. Civ. Prac., par. 510.12), we feel that the discretion of the court was improperly exercised in this instance. Plaintiffs failed to submit an affidavit on the merits of its claim. The testimony of the witnesses, not in its employ, listed by plaintiffs, is not material to the issues presented. Rabin, Acting P. J., Hopkins, Benjamin, Martuseello and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.
§ 429.148 Routine violator. ( a ) DOE will consider, *inter alia,* the following factors in determining if a person is a routine violator: Number of violations in current and past cases, length of time over which violations occurred, ratio of compliant to noncompliant installations or sales, percentage of employees committing violations, evidence of intent, evidence of training or education provided, and subsequent remedial actions.
( b ) In the event that DOE determines a person to be a routine violator, DOE will issue a Notice of Finding of Routine Violation.
( c ) In making a finding of Routine Violation, DOE will consider whether the Routine Violation was limited to a specific location. If DOE finds that the routine violation was so limited, DOE may, in its discretion, in the Notice of Finding of Routine Violation limit the prohibition on manufacturer and/or private labeler sales to a particular contractor or distribution location.
[81 FR 45403, July 14, 2016]
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

Alejandro Hernandez and The Freedom 

Indeed Foundation, Inc.,

 

 Appellant,

v.

Constable R.A. Sommers Precint #7,

 Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-18-00045-CV

Appeal from the

County Court at Law No. 7

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 2017DCV0816)

O R D E R

On June 13, 2018, the Court issued an order for the trial court to conduct a hearing on the 

court reporter’s challenge to Appellants statement of inability to afford to pay costs on appeal. The 

hearing is scheduled for June 28, 2018. Appellants have filed a motion to cancel the hearing 

because they have determined the reporter’s record is not necessary for the appeal and they have 

withdrawn their request for the court reporter to prepare the reporter’s record. The motion is 

GRANTED. The trial court is not required to conduct the hearing and the court reporter is not 

required to file the reporter’s record previously requested by Appellants. Appellants’ brief is due 

to be filed no later than July 27, 2018.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 27th day of June, 2018.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez and Palafox, JJ.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 542 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                 House Calendar No. 115
109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 542

                          [Report No. 109-281]

  Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4241) to provide for 
reconciliation pursuant to section 201(a) of the concurrent resolution 
                  on the budget for fiscal year 2006.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            November 9, 2005

    Mr. Putnam, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4241) to provide for 
reconciliation pursuant to section 201(a) of the concurrent resolution 
                  on the budget for fiscal year 2006.

    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order without intervention of any point of order to consider in the 
House the bill (H.R. 4241) to provide for reconciliation pursuant to 
section 201(a) of the concurrent resolution on the budget for fiscal 
year 2006. The bill shall be considered as read. The amendment printed 
in the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution 
shall be considered as adopted. All points of order against provisions 
in the bill, as amended, are waived. The previous question shall be 
considered as ordered on the bill, as amended, to final passage without 
intervening motion except: (1) two hours of debate equally divided and 
controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee 
on the Budget; and (2) one motion to recommit with or without 
instructions.
    Sec. 2. During consideration of H.R. 4241 pursuant to this 
resolution, notwithstanding the operation of the previous question, the 
Chair may postpone further consideration of the bill to a time 
designated by the Speaker.
                                                 House Calendar No. 115

109th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                              H. RES. 542

                          [Report No. 109-281]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

  Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 4241) to provide for 
reconciliation pursuant to section 201(a) of the concurrent resolution 
                  on the budget for fiscal year 2006.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            November 9, 2005

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
H. Res. 221 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

March 23, 2017. 

Resolved, That the requirement of clause 6(a) of rule 

XIII for a two-thirds vote to consider a report from the Committee on Rules on the same day it is presented to the House 

is waived with respect to any resolution reported through the 

legislative day of March 27, 2017. 

SEC. 2. It shall be in order at any time through the calendar day of March 26, 2017, for the Speaker to entertain 

motions that the House suspend the rules as though under 

clause 1 of rule XV. The Speaker or his designee shall consult with the Minority Leader or her designee on the designation of any matter for consideration pursuant to this section. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 345 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                         June 30, 2005.
    Resolved, That it shall be in order at any time on the legislative day of 
Thursday, June 30, 2005, for the Speaker to entertain motions that the House 
suspend the rules. The Speaker or his designee shall consult with the Minority 
Leader or her designee on the designation of any matter for consideration 
pursuant to this resolution.
    Sec. 2. Upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in order, any rule 
of the House to the contrary notwithstanding, to consider concurrent resolutions 
providing for adjournment of the House and Senate during the month of July.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the amended Quarterly Report of AccuPoll Holding Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Dennis Vadura, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


May 20, 2005                            /s/ Dennis Vadura
                                          --------------------------------------
                                            Dennis Vadura
                                            Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

October 31, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 04-40871

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ISABEL RUANO,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:04-CR-238-1

--------------------

Before JOLLY, DAVIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Isabel Ruano appeals from the sentence imposed following her

guilty plea to transporting illegal aliens for commercial gain. 

She argues that she was sentenced in contravention to United

States v. Booker, 125 S. Ct. 738 (2005), when her sentence was

enhanced pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2L1.1(5) (2003) and by virtue of

the fact that she was sentenced pursuant to the mandatory

Sentencing Guidelines regime.
No. 04-40871

-2-

The district court, however, opined that if the Guidelines

were held unconstitutional, it would impose the same sentence. 

Therefore, the Government has carried its burden of establishing

that the sentencing errors suffered by Ruano were harmless beyond

a reasonable doubt. United States v. Walters, 418 F.3d 461, 464

(5th Cir. 2005); United States v. Akpan, 407 F.3d 360, 376 (5th

Cir. 2005). 

AFFIRMED.
§ 603.205 Nature of the project. Judgments relating to the nature of the project include: ( a ) The principal purpose of the project is to carry out a public purpose of support or stimulation of RD&D (i.e., assistance), rather than acquiring goods or services for the benefit of the Government (i.e., acquisition);
( b ) To the maximum extent practicable, the TIA does not support RD&D that duplicates other RD&D being conducted under existing programs carried out by the DOE; and
( c ) The use of a standard contract, grant or cooperative agreement for the project is not feasible or appropriate (see questions in § 603.225).
#### PEOPLE v. MONATON REALTY INVESTING CORPORATION.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

November 27, 1914.)

Proceeding by the People of the State of New York against Monaton Realty Investing Corporation.

No' opinion. Motion to dismiss appeal granted, with $10 costs. Order filed.