alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           6,776
<SECURITIES>                                     4,509
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,246
<ALLOWANCES>                                       633
<INVENTORY>                                     12,605
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                35,865
<PP&E>                                          12,857
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,346
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  47,529
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           12,938
<BONDS>                                          4,702
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        33,629
<OTHER-SE>                                      (4,054)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    47,529
<SALES>                                         15,938
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                16,242
<CGS>                                           11,449
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   11,728
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,700
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 249
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    789
<INCOME-TAX>                                       108
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                726
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       726
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.11
        

</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of Mayne Pharma (USA) Inc., Respondent, v Enzon Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Appellant.

[814 NYS2d 871]

Appeal from orders, Supreme Court, New York County (Jane S. Solomon, J.), entered August 11, 2005 and August 12, 2005, unanimously withdrawn in accordance with the terms of the stipulation of the parties hereto. No opinion. Order filed. Concur—Tom, J.P., Friedman, Nardelli and Sweeny, JJ.
§ 54.29 Standards for issuance of a renewed license. A renewed license may be issued by the Commission up to the full term authorized by § 54.31 if the Commission finds that: ( a ) Actions have been identified and have been or will be taken with respect to the matters identified in paragraphs (a)(1) and (a)(2) of this section, such that there is reasonable assurance that the activities authorized by the renewed license will continue to be conducted in accordance with the CLB, and that any changes made to the plant's CLB in order to comply with this paragraph are in accord with the Act and the Commission's regulations. These matters are: ( 1 ) managing the effects of aging during the period of extended operation on the functionality of structures and components that have been identified to require review under § 54.21(a)(1); and
( 2 ) time-limited aging analyses that have been identified to require review under § 54.21(c).
( b ) Any applicable requirements of subpart A of 10 CFR part 51 have been satisfied.
( c ) Any matters raised under § 2.335 have been addressed.
[60 FR 22491, May 8, 1995, as amended at 69 FR 2279, Jan. 14, 2004]
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 137 (Wednesday, July 17, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 42751-42752]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-17207]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS

Sunshine Act Notice

AGENCY: United States Commission on Civil Rights.

ACTION: Notice of telephonic meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DATE AND TIME: Sunday, July 21, 2013; 8:00 p.m. ET.

PLACE: Via Teleconference, Public Dial In: 1-(800) 967-7154, Conference 
ID  150-561.

Meeting Agenda

    This meeting is open to the public, except where noted otherwise.

I. Program Planning
II. Discussion and Approval of Part B: Findings and Recommendations for 
the 2013 Statutory Enforcement Report--Sexual Assault in the Military
III. Adjourn

CONTACT PERSON FOR FURTHER INFORMATION: Lenore Ostrowsky, Acting Chief, 
Public Affairs Unit (202) 376-8591. TDD: (202) 376-8116.
    Persons with a disability requiring special services, such as an 
interpreter for the hearing impaired, should contact Pamela Dunston at 
least seven days prior to the meeting at 202-376-8105. TDD: (202) 376-
8116.

[[Page 42752]]

    Dated: July 12, 2013.
David Mussatt,
Acting RPCU Chief.
[FR Doc. 2013-17207 Filed 7-15-13; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
```
# L_2023172EN.01001901.xml

| 6.7.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 172/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.7.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 172/19

---

DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE No 104/2020

of 14 July 2020

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement [2023/1364]

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area (“the EEA Agreement”), and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/1971 of 26 November 2019 on recognition of the Universal Feed Assurance Scheme for demonstrating compliance with the sustainability criteria under Directives 98/70/EC and 2009/28/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/1971 of 26 November 2019 on recognition of the Universal Feed Assurance Scheme for demonstrating compliance with the sustainability criteria under Directives 98/70/EC and 2009/28/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (1) is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement.

| (2) | Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Annex II to the EEA Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following point is inserted after point 6azc (Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/1993) of Chapter XVII of Annex II to the EEA Agreement:

| ‘6azd. | 32019 D 1971: Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/1971 of 26 November 2019 on recognition of the Universal Feed Assurance Scheme for demonstrating compliance with the sustainability criteria under Directives 98/70/EC and 2009/28/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 307, 28.11.2019, p. 54).’ |
| --- | --- |

‘6azd.

32019 D 1971: Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/1971 of 26 November 2019 on recognition of the Universal Feed Assurance Scheme for demonstrating compliance with the sustainability criteria under Directives 98/70/EC and 2009/28/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 307, 28.11.2019, p. 54).’

Article 2

The text of Implementing Decision (EU) 2019/1971 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 15 July 2020, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement have been made (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 14 July 2020.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

Sabine MONAUNI

---

(1)  
  OJ L 307, 28.11.2019, p. 54.

1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

*1

---
43.103 Types of contract modifications.

(b) Unilateral.

(S-90) In cases when the contractor is unable to sign a bilateral modification deobligating an

unliquidated obligation (ULO), the contracting officer may issue a unilateral deobligation

modification with concurrence of Office of Counsel.

Parent topic: SUBPART 43.1 – GENERAL
223 So.2d 874

#### Harold TYLER et al. v. R. D. ELSTON.

No. 49956.

July 1, 1969.

In re: R. D. Elston applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition and review.

The application is denied. Exceptions having been overruled by the trial court, there is no final judgment.
Case 2:06-cv-00759-LES-CSC Document 3 Filed 08/30/2006 Page 1 of 1
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Frank Roark, Appellant.

[814 NYS2d 814]

*1173Spain, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Lamont, J.), rendered April 9, 2004 in Albany County, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree.

Defendant was charged with criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree in connection with his sale of approximately 14 grams of cocaine to a confidential informant in exchange for $1,000 in cash. Defendant pleaded guilty to attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and, although defendant failed to appear at sentencing, Supreme Court sentenced him in accordance with the plea agreement as a predicate felon to SVa to 11 years in prison. On defendant’s appeal, we affirm.

Defendant sought to withdraw his guilty plea prior to sentencing, arguing then and now on appeal that he is innocent and was pressured into pleading guilty. Supreme Court reviewed the transcript of the plea colloquy and gave defendant and his attorney an opportunity to be heard on the issue before denying defendant’s motion. Mindful that the decision to allow a defendant to withdraw a guilty plea rests within the sound discretion of the trial court and having reviewed the plea colloquy and found that defendant entered a knowing, voluntary and informed plea, in the course of which he made sufficient factual admissions to establish his guilt, we find no reason to disturb Supreme Court’s decision to deny defendant’s motion to withdraw his plea *(see People v Obert,*1 AD3d 631, 631-632 [2003], *lv denied*2 NY3d 764 [2004]; *People v Babcock,*304 AD2d 912, 912 [2003]).

Next, we find defendant’s challenge to the denial of his motion to suppress the buy money found in his possession unpersuasive. Defendant’s contention that the People failed to demonstrate the reliability of the confidential informant is inapposite given the fact that the confidential informant did not testify at the suppression hearing; indeed, the testimony of the officers involved in the arrest established that the police directly monitored the buy and, thus, obtained sufficient information to establish probable cause to make the arrest and seize the money without relying on any statements or observation made by the confidential informant *(see People v Williams,*25 AD3d 927, 928-929 [2006]; *People v Mendoza,*5 AD3d 810, 813 [2004], *lv denied*3 NY3d 644 [2004]).

Finally, we find no evidence that Supreme Court abused its discretion in sentencing defendant to the agreed upon sentence *1174and no extraordinary circumstances which would persuade us to reduce defendant’s sentence in the interest of justice *(see People v Williams, supra*at 929; *People v Youmans,*11 AD3d 823 [2004]; *People v Calkins,*6 AD3d 744, 746 [2004], *lv denied 3*NY3d 671 [2004]).

Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Mugglin and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

M IDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABA M A

OFFICE OF THE CLERK

POST OFFICE BOX 711

MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA 36101-0711

DEBRA P. HACKETT, CLERK

TELEPHONE (334) 954-3600

November 14, 2006

NOTICE OF CORRECTION

From: Clerk’s Office

Case Style: Smith v. Hyundai Motor Manufacturing Alabama, LLC

Case Number: 2:06cv00745-WKW

This Notice of Correction was filed in the referenced case this date to correct the PDF

document previously attached. 

The correct PDF document is attached to this notice for your review. Reference is made to

document # 11 filed on November 13, 2006.

Case 2:06-cv-00745-WKW-CSC Document 12 Filed 11/14/2006 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

Grady Clifford Smith,

Plaintiff,

vs. Civil Action No.:

Hyundai Motor Manufacturing 2:06-cv-745-WKW-CSC

Alabama, LLC,

Defendant.

_____________________________

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE BY T. SCOTT KELLY

COMES NOW T. Scott Kelly and gives notice of his appearance as additional counsel of

record on behalf of Defendant, Hyundai Motor Manufacturing Alabama, LLC (hereinafter “HMMA”

or “Defendant”).

Respectfully submitted,

s/ T. Scott Kelly

T. Scott Kelly (ASB-0345-050K)

Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.

One Federal Place, Suite 1000

1819 5

th Avenue North

Birmingham, AL 35203-2118

Telephone: (205) 328-1900

Facsimile: (205) 328-6000

E-mail: Scott.Kelly@odnss.com

ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT

Case 2:06-cv-00745-WKW-CSC Document 12-2 Filed 11/14/2006 Page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on the 13

th

day of November, 2006, I electronically filed the foregoing

Notice of Appearance with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send

notification of such filing to the following: Cynthia Forman Wilkinson, Esq.

s/ T. Scott Kelly

T. Scott Kelly (ASB-0345-050K)

Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.

One Federal Place, Suite 1000

1819 5

th Avenue North

Birmingham, AL 35203-2118

Telephone: (205) 328-1900

Facsimile: (205) 328-6000

E-mail: Scott.Kelly@odnss.com

ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT

Case 2:06-cv-00745-WKW-CSC Document 12-2 Filed 11/14/2006 Page 2 of 2
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6302
JAMES WILLIAM PAYNE, Petitioner - Appellant, versus WILLIAM L. SMITH, Warden; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND, Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. John R. Hargrove, Senior District Judge. (CA-95-273-HAR) Submitted: July 2, 1996 Decided: July 26, 1996 Before ERVIN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. James William Payne, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Ann Norman Bosse, Michelle Nicol Levister, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* As amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1217. 2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1988) petition. * We have reviewedthe record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Payne v. Smith , No. CA-95-273-HAR (D. Md. Feb. 20, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
1

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

V. ) CR. No.: 2:06cr196-MHT

)

NESTOR AMAIQUEMA-MACIAS )

DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR IMMEDIATE SENTENCING

COMES NOW the Defendant, Nestor Amaiquema-Macias, by and through undersigned

counsel, Kevin L. Butler, and respectfully requests that his sentencing be conducted as soon as

possible. In support thereof, Mr. Amaiquema-Macias would show:

A. On October 23, 2006, Mr. Amaiquema-Macias entered a plea of guilty to the single

count charged in the indictment.

B. On December 12, 2006, undersigned counsel received a copy of the PSI Report from

United States Probation Office. The defendant, through undersigned counsel, waives any objections

to the PSI Report.

C. Because the draft PSI contains sufficient information to allow the Court to exercise

its sentencing authority under 18 U.S.C. § 3553, pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 32(b)(2), the defendant

requests that sentencing be advanced. See also, Fed. R. Crim. P. 32(c)(1)(A)(ii). 

Dated this 20 day of December 2006. th

Case 2:06-cr-00196-MHT-CSC Document 20 Filed 12/20/2006 Page 1 of 3
2

Respectfully submitted,

s/ Kevin L. Butler

KEVIN L. BUTLER

First Assistant Federal Defender

201 Monroe Street, Suite 407

Montgomery, Alabama 36104

Phone: (334) 834-2099

Fax: (334) 834-0353

E-mail: kevin_butler@fd.org

AZ Bar Code: 014138

Case 2:06-cr-00196-MHT-CSC Document 20 Filed 12/20/2006 Page 2 of 3
3

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

V. ) CR. No.: 2:06cr196-MHT

)

NESTOR AMAIQUEMA-MACIAS )

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on December 20, 2006, I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk

of Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing to the following: 

Andy Schiff, Esquire

Assistant United States Attorney

One Court Square, Suite 201

Montgomery, Alabama 36104

Respectfully submitted,

s/ Kevin L. Butler

KEVIN L. BUTLER

First Assistant Federal Defender

201 Monroe Street, Suite 407

Montgomery, Alabama 36104

Phone: (334) 834-2099

Fax: (334) 834-0353

E-mail: kevin_butler@fd.org

AZ Bar Code: 014138

Case 2:06-cr-00196-MHT-CSC Document 20 Filed 12/20/2006 Page 3 of 3
Amendment dated February 24, 2010 to Employment Agreement - James S. Tisch



 Exhibit 10.13 
 February 24, 2010 
 Mr. James S. Tisch

 667 Madison Avenue 
 New York, New York 10065 
 Dear Mr. Tisch: 
 Reference is made to your Amended and Restated Employment Agreement with Loews Corporation (the “Company”) dated
February 25, 2008 (as amended, the “Employment Agreement”). 
 This will confirm our agreement
that the Employment Agreement is amended as follows: 
 1. Term of Employment. The period of your
employment under and pursuant to the Employment Agreement is hereby extended for an additional period through and including March 31, 2011 upon all the terms, conditions and provisions of the Employment Agreement, as hereby amended. 

2. Compensation. You shall be paid as basic compensation (the “Basic Compensation”) for your services to
the Company and its subsidiaries under and pursuant to the Employment Agreement a salary at the rate of Nine Hundred Seventy-Five Thousand ($975,000) Dollars per annum through March 31, 2011. Basic Compensation shall be payable in accordance
with the Company’s customary payroll practices as in effect from time to time, and shall be subject to such increases as the Board of Directors of the Company, in its sole discretion, may from time to time determine. 
 3. Incentive Compensation Plan. In addition to receipt of Basic Compensation under the Employment Agreement, you
shall participate in the Incentive Compensation Plan for Executive Officers of the Company (the “Compensation Plan”) and shall be eligible to receive incentive compensation under the Compensation Plan as may be awarded in accordance with
its terms. 
 4. Other Compensation. The compensation provided pursuant to this Letter Agreement shall be
exclusive of compensation and fees, if any, to which you may be entitled as an officer or director of a subsidiary of the Company. 
 Except as herein modified or amended, the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 







 Mr. James S. Tisch 
 As of February 24, 2010 
 Page 2 
 If the foregoing is in accordance with your understanding, would you please sign the enclosed duplicate copy of this Letter
Agreement at the place indicated below and return the same to us for our records. 
  

	
	Very truly yours,
	
	LOEWS CORPORATION


  

			
	By:	 	 /s/ Gary W. Garson

		 	Gary W. Garson
		 	Senior Vice President


  

	
	ACCEPTED AND AGREED TO:
	
	 /s/ James S. Tisch

	James S. Tisch
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

May 27, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-60932

CATHERINE ALDRIDGE, Administratix of the estate of Bonnie M.

Stigger, for the use and benefit of the estate of Bonnie M.

Stigger, and for the use and benefit of the wrongful death 

of Bonnie M. Stigger; CATHERINE ALDRIDGE,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

versus

J. D. LEE; GEORGE D. MORGAN; BOYD P. GENTRY; NATIONAL HERITAGE

REALTY, INC., formerly known as Southmark Heritage Corp.;

EVERGREEN HEALTHCARE, INC.; GRANCARE LLC, formerly known as

Grancare, Inc.; MARINER HEALTH CARE, INC., formerly known as

Mariner Post-Acute Network, Inc.; CHARLES W. FRANCIS; JOHN

DOES, 1 Through 10; and Unidentified Entities 1 through 10;

(as to Clinton Health and Rehabilitation Center),

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Mississippi

(3:03-CV-124)

Before KING, Chief Judge, and BARKSDALE and STEWART, Circuit

Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

In the light of Gray v. Beverly Enterprises, Inc., 390 F.3d

400 (5th Cir. 2004), the district court’s remand-denial and
2

dismissal of Charles W. Francis are VACATED; and this matter is

REMANDED to the district court for remand to state court.

VACATED and REMANDED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                           3,160
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,124
<ALLOWANCES>                                        27
<INVENTORY>                                      5,521
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                11,111
<PP&E>                                          22,726
<DEPRECIATION>                                  11,557
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  22,891
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,120
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            31
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                      10,325
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    22,891
<SALES>                                         24,826
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                24,826
<CGS>                                           18,200
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   18,200
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,610
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 326
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,818
<INCOME-TAX>                                       470
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,347
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,347
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .72
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .71
        

</TABLE>