alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Janine Diderou, an Infant, by Eleanor Diderou, Her Mother and Natural Guardian, et al., Appellants, v. Pinecrest Dunes, Inc., Respondent.

— In a negligence and breach of contract action against the operator of a summer camp to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., arising out of the fall from a horse of the infant plaintiff camper, plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated July 22, 1969, which granted defendant’s motion to vacate plaintiffs’ demand for a bill of particulars of the affirmative defense of assumption of risk. Order modified, on the. law and the facts, by striking out everything after the decretal provision that defendant’s motion _ “ is hereby granted ” and by adding, immediately after said word “ granted ” the following: “ to the extent of striking out items • 5 ’ and ‘ 6 ’ of the demand and the motion is otherwise denied ”. As so modified, order affirmed, without costs. The bill of particulars shall be served within 20 days after entry of the order hereon. The defense in substance consists of the bare allegation that horseback riding involves unstated inherent dangers of which, upon enrolling, plaintiffs assumed the risk. Items 1 to 4 of the demand *673pertain to the terms of the infant plaintiff’s enrollment upon which the defense is predicated. Items 5 and 6 require defendant to set forth whether plaintiffs, or either of them, were given notice or warning by defendant of the relevant risks and, if so, the substance thereof. In our opinion, plaintiffs are entitled to particulars respecting items "1” to “4” inclusive. As respects voluntary participation in a sport, the doctrine of assumption of risk applies to any facet of the activity inherent in it and to any open and obvious condition of the place where it is carried on *(Hoffman*v. *Silbert,*24 A D 2d 493, affd. 19 N Y 2d 661; *Luftig*v. *Steinhorn,*21 A D 2d 760, affd. 16 N Y 2d 568; *Lobsenz*v. *Rubinstein,*258 App. Div. 164, affd. 283 N. Y. 600) and imports a knowledge and awareness of the particular hazard that caused the injury *(McEvoy*v. *City of New York,*266 App. Div. 445, affd. 292 N. Y. 654; *Stevens*v. *Central School Dist. No. 1,*25 A D 2d 871). At bar, the defense is stated in broad and sweeping terms, without any bounds in terms of prospective development zat the trial. In the circumstances, a bill as above indicated is required to define the issues, limit the proof and apprise plaintiffs of what they are required to meet *(Mass*v. *Manhattan Life Ins. Co.,*23 A D 2d 585; *Havholm*v. *Whale Creek Iron Works,*159 App. Div. 578; *Peterson*v. *Lehigh Val. R. Co.,*190 N. Y. S. 883). We believe, however, that items “ 5 ” and “ 6 ” cover matters that had hest be left to discovery upon examination before trial. Christ, P. J., Rabin, Hopkins and Brennan, JJ., concur. (Beldock, P. J., deceased.)
H. Res. 483

In the House of Representatives, U.S., 

December 19 (legislative day, December 18), 2005.

Whereas the American Bar Association’s National Teen Dating Violence Prevention (TDVPI) is a federally funded, 

comprehensive program that is aimed at putting a stop 

to the incidence of teen dating violence; 

Whereas the TDVPI together with parents, schools and communities intends to positively impact the way teens view 

and value themselves and others; 

Whereas the TDVPI is designed to teach and influence appropriate interpersonal behavior by increasing the knowledge and skills of our nation’s youth enabling them to 

form lasting and healthy relationships as adults; and 

Whereas the week of February 6, 2006 has been recognized 

as an appropriate week for activities furthering awareness of teen dating violence: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved, That the House of Representatives supports an 

increased awareness among parents, schools, and commu-
2

•HRES 483 EH 

nities that dating violence is a criminal act and the ideals of 

the National Teen Dating Violence and Prevention Week. 

Attest:

Clerk.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 244 (Tuesday, December 21, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 80061-80062]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-32025]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious 
Diseases Special Emphasis Panel, Unsolicited Multi-Project (P01) 
Grant Applications.
    Date: January 12, 2011.
    Time: 1 p.m. to 5 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6700B Rockledge Drive, 
Bethesda, MD 20817. (Telephone Conference Call.)
    Contact Person: Roberta Binder, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, 
Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural Activities, NIAID/
NIH/DHHS, 6700B Rockledge Drive, Room 3130, Bethesda, MD 20892-7616. 
301-496-7966. <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#3341515a5d575641735d5a525a571d5d5a5b1d545c45"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a3d1c1cacdc7c6d1e3cdcac2cac78dcdcacb8dc4ccd5">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)



[[Page 80062]]


    Dated: December 15, 2010.
Jennifer S. Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2010-32025 Filed 12-20-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Emma Randolph, Respondent, v Charles N. Cornell, Appellant, et al., Defendants.

[816 NYS2d 111]

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for medical malpractice, the defendant Charles N. Cornell appeals from an or*558der of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Hart, J.), dated May 5, 2005, which denied his motion pursuant to CPLR 3216 to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against him for failure to prosecute.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law and as an exercise of discretion, with costs, the motion is granted, the complaint is dismissed insofar as asserted against the appellant, and the action against the remaining defendant is severed.

Where a party is served with a 90-day notice pursuant to CPLR 3216, it is incumbent upon that party to comply with the notice by filing a note of issue or by moving, before the default date, either to vacate the notice or extend the 90-day period *(see Chaudhry v Ziomek,*21 AD3d 922,. 924 [2005], *lv denied*6 NY3d 703 [2006]; *Allen v Makhnevich,*15 AD3d 425, 426 [2005]; *Brady v Benenson Capital Co., 2*AD3d 382 [2003]). The plaintiff did neither. Accordingly, to avoid dismissal, the plaintiff was required to show both a justifiable excuse for the delay in properly responding to the 90-day notice, and the existence of a meritorious cause of action *(see*CPLR 3216 [e]; *Johnson v State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.,*291 AD2d 533 [2002]; *Moran v Pathmark Stores,*278 AD2d 208, 209 [2000]). The plaintiff failed to show the existence of a meritorious cause of action *(see Mosberg v Elahi,*80 NY2d 941, 942 [1992]; *Fiore v Galang,*64 NY2d 999, 1000-1001 [1985]; *Salch v Paratore,*60 NY2d 851, 852 [1983]; *Burke v Klein,*269 AD2d 348, 348-349 [2000]; *Abelard v Interfaith Med. Ctr.,*202 AD2d 615, 616 [1994]; *Feinblum v Dybner,*197 AD2d 560 [1993]). Accordingly, the Supreme Court should have granted the appellant’s motion to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against him. Schmidt, J.P., Crane, Krausman, Skelos and Lunn, JJ., concur.
#### PEISER v. KALISH et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

July 10, 1914.)

Action by Isaac Peiser against Edwin L. Kalish and others.

No opinion. Motion denied, with $10 costs. Order filed. See, also, 147 N. Y. Supp. 1131.
§ 490.205 Reporting requirements. ( a ) Any State subject to the requirements of this subpart must file an annual report for each State fleet on or before the December 31 after the close of the model year, beginning with model year 1997. The State annual report may consist of a single State report or separately prepared State agency reports.
( b ) The report shall include the following information: ( 1 ) Number of new light duty motor vehicles acquired for the fleet by a State during the model year;
( 2 ) Number of new light duty alternative fueled vehicles that are required to be acquired during the model year;
( 3 ) Number of new light duty alternative fueled vehicle acquisitions by the State during the model year;
( 4 ) Number of alternative fueled vehicle credits applied towards acquisition requirements pursuant to § 490.505;
( 5 ) For each new light duty alternative fueled vehicle acquisition— ( i ) Vehicle make and model;
( ii ) Model year;
( iii ) Vehicle identification number;
( iv ) An indication of whether the vehicle is a dedicated vehicle or a dual fueled vehicle;
( v ) Type(s) of alternative fuel on which the vehicle is capable of operating;
( vi ) Acquisition date; and
( vii ) If the annual report shows that the State fleet did not satisfy its alternative fueled vehicle acquisition mandate, an indication of whether the fleet intends to submit a request for exemption under § 490.204; and
( 6 ) Number of light duty alternative fueled vehicles acquired by municipal and private fleets during the model year under an approved Light Duty Alternative Fueled Vehicle Plan (if applicable).
( c ) If banked alternative fueled vehicle credits are applied towards a State's alternative fueled vehicle acquisition requirements pursuant to § 490.505, or if allocation of alternative fueled vehicle credits is sought under subpart F of this part, then a credit activity report, as described in § 490.508, must be included with the annual report submitted under this section.
( d ) Records shall be maintained and retained for a period of three years.
( e ) All reports, marked “Annual Report,” shall be sent to the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, U.S. Department of Energy, EE-33, 1000 Independence Ave., SW., Washington, DC, 20585, or such other address as DOE may provide by notice in the Federal Register.
[61 FR 10653, Mar. 14, 1996, as amended at 79 FR 15903, Mar. 21, 2014]
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 570 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 570

 Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 3925) to provide that a 
    Federal public safety position may not be held by any political 
       appointee who does not meet certain minimum requirements.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 17, 2005

 Mr. Waxman submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                         the Committee on Rules

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 3925) to provide that a 
    Federal public safety position may not be held by any political 
       appointee who does not meet certain minimum requirements.

    Resolved, That immediately upon the adoption of this resolution the 
House shall without intervention of any point of order consider in the 
House the bill (H.R. 3925) to provide that a Federal public safety 
position may not be held by any political appointee who does not meet 
certain minimum requirements. The bill shall be considered as read. The 
previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill to final 
passage without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate on 
the bill equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking 
minority member of the Committee on Government Reform; and (2) one 
motion to recommit.
                                 <all>
```
222 So.2d 63

#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Leon PRITCHARD v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 49828.

May 7, 1969.

In re: Leon Pritchard applying for writ of habeas corpus.

Writ refused. The showing made does not entitle relator to the relief prayed for.
PGI SUBPART 53.90 – FORMATS AND

TEMPLATES

(Added January 11, 2022 in accordance with through PROCLTR 2022-03)

Parent topic: PGI PART 53 – FORMS

PGI 53.9000 Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI)

Marking.

(a) The originator of a communication or documentation is responsible for determining, at the time

of creation, whether information in a communication or documentation falls into a CUI category.

Controlled by: [Name of DoD Component determining that the information is CUI] (This should

normally be DLA and MSC name. Omit this if using memo with DLA or DLA procuring

organization letterhead.)

Controlled by: [Name of Office making the CUI determination] (This is typically the procuring

organization sublevel/branch name or code.)

CUI Category: [List category or categories of CUI] (The most common categories are General

Procurement, Source Selection, and Privacy; however, others may apply (e.g., General

Proprietary Business Information, Legal Privilege.). Documents marked for the CUI Category -

Source Selection still require markings IAW FAR 3.104-4(c). The top and bottom of each page

must also be marked “Source Selection Information - See FAR 2.101 and 3.104”.)

Distribution/Dissemination Control: [Include Limited Dissemination Control of who can view the

document] (In most cases use “FED ONLY” for internal documents and emails. Use “FEDCON”

for emails and other correspondence with contractors. The CUI Limited Dissemination Controls

list in DLAI 5200.48 includes all available options.)

POC: [Email address or phone number of document originator]

(b) Contracting Officers may access the following resources and training material for additional

guidance:

(1) DoDI 5200.48 Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI)

(https://dlamil.dps.mil/sites/Intelligence/PublishingImages/cui/DoDI%205200.48%20-%20Controlled

%20Unclassified%20Information%20%28CUI%29%20%28002%29.pdf).

(2) DLAI 5200.48, Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI)

(https://dlamil.dps.mil/sites/Intelligence/Shared%20Documents/DLAI%205200.48%20CUI.pdf).

(3) DLA Intelligence CUI Resources (https://dlamil.dps.mil/sites/Intelligence/cui).

(4) CUI Categories | National Archives

(https://www.bing.com/search?q=categories%3A+https%3A%2F%2Fwww.archives.gov%2Fcui%2Fr

egistry%2Fcategorylist&src=IE-SearchBox&FORM=IESR3N)

(5) DoD CUI Training (PowerPoint)

(https://www.dodcui.mil/Portals/109/Documents/Training%20Docs/21-S-0588%20cleared%20CUI%2
0Awareness%20Training%20Nov%202020.pdf?ver=eOMZuMPrdLXcnhS6egUe2w%3d%3d)(see

pages 21 through 24 for examples of markings).
#### § 1013.42 Judicial review.

Section 3805 of title 31, United States Code, authorizes judicial review by an appropriate United States District Court of a final decision of the authority head imposing penalties or assessments under this part and specifies the procedures for such review.
#### HOUSE, Appellant, v. TAYLOR et al. Respondents.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

July 1, 1914.)

Action by *1122Herman House against Elizabeth Taylor and others.

No opinion. Judgment unanimously affirmed, "with costs.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 33 (Friday, February 19, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 7488-7489]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-3218]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious 
Diseases Special Emphasis Panel, Basic Vaccine Discovery Research.
    Date: March 3-4, 2010.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 6 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Hyatt Regency Bethesda, One Bethesda Metro Center, 7400 
Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20814.
    Contact Person: Eugene R. Baizman, PhD, Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural 
Activities, NIAID/NIH/DHHS, 6700B Rockledge Drive, MSC 7616, 
Bethesda, MD 20892. 301-402-1464. <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b1d4d3838286d4f1dfd8d99fd6dec7"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="7613144445411336181f1e58111900">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious 
Diseases Special Emphasis Panel, NIAID Product Development Public 
Private Partnerships.
    Date: March 3-4, 2010.
    Time: 8 a.m. to 1 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Crowne Plaza Hotel--Silver Spring, 8777 Georgia Avenue, 
Silver Spring, MD 20910.
    Contact Person: Jane K. Battles, PhD, Scientific Review Officer, 
Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural Activities, 
National Institutes of Health/NIAID, 6700B Rockledge Drive, MSC 
7616, Bethesda, MD 20892-7616. 301-451-2744. <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f7959683839b92849d96b79a969e9bd9999e9fd9909881"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="98faf9ececf4fdebf2f9d8f5f9f1f4b6f6f1f0b6fff7ee">[email protected]</span></a>.


[[Page 7489]]


(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: February 4, 2010.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2010-3218 Filed 2-18-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
PGI 246.370 Notification of potential safety issues.       (1)  The objective of this requirement is to ensure that the Government receives timely notification of potential safety defects so that—          (i)  Systems and equipment likely affected by the situation can be identified; and          (ii)  An appropriate engineering investigation and follow-on actions can be taken to establish and mitigate risk.          (2)  The notification is intended to be neither an admission of nor a release from liability.          (3)  Upon notification of a potential safety nonconformance or deficiency—          (i)  The procuring contracting officer must—          (A)  Advise the affected program office(s) or integrated materiel manager(s); and          (B)  Request a point of contact from the affected program office(s) or materiel management organization to assess the impact of the situation, address technical concerns, and provide recommendations;          (ii)  The administrative contracting officer must—          (A)  Confirm that potentially affected program offices, integrated materiel managers, and other contract management offices that may be recipients of the suspect items are aware of the situation; and          (B)  Identify a point of contact to provide support and technical assistance to the investigative team; and          (iii)  For replenishment parts, the integrated materiel manager must—          (A)  Identify any potentially affected programs or equipment; and          (B)  Request engineering assistance from affected engineering support activities, as prescribed by—          *(1)*  DLAI 3200.1/PAM 715.13/NAVSUPINST 4120.30A/AFI 21-408/MCO 4000.18, Engineering Support Instruction for Items Supplied by Defense Logistics Agency;          *(2)*  SECNAVINST 4140.2/AFI 20-106/DA PAM 95-9/DLAI 3200.4/DCMA INST CSI (AV), Management of Aviation Critical Safety Items;          *(3)*  DA PAM 738-751, Functional Users Manual for the Army Maintenance Management System—Aviation (TAMMS-A);          *(4)*  AMCOM REG 702-7, Flight Safety Parts/New Source Testing Program Management; or          *(5)*  Internal agency procedures.    **Parent topic:** PGI 246.3 -CONTRACT CLAUSES
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 951 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.951

                     One Hundred Fifteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
           the third day of January, two thousand and eighteen

                                 An Act

 
      To extend the deadline for commencement of construction of a 
                         hydroelectric project.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. EXTENSION.
    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding the time period specified in 
section 13 of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 806) that would 
otherwise apply to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission project 
numbered 12642, the Commission may, at the request of the licensee for 
the project, and after reasonable notice, in accordance with the good 
faith, due diligence, and public interest requirements of that section 
and the Commission's procedures under that section, extend the time 
period during which the licensee is required to commence the 
construction of the project for up to 3 consecutive 2-year periods from 
the date of the expiration of the extension originally issued by the 
Commission.
    (b) Reinstatement of Expired License.--If the period required for 
commencement of construction of the project described in subsection (a) 
has expired prior to the date of the enactment of this Act, the 
Commission may reinstate the license effective as of the date of its 
expiration and the first extension authorized under subsection (a) 
shall take effect on the date of such expiration.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```