alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1080 

Recognizing the important role of chefs in responding to natural disasters. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 25, 2018 

Mrs. TORRES (for herself and Mr. WEBER of Texas) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and 

Infrastructure, and in addition to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, for 

a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for 

consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the important role of chefs in responding to 

natural disasters. 

Whereas, on January 12, 2010, a 7.0 magnitude earthquake 

struck Haiti, taking the lives of approximately 250,000 

people and displacing at least 1,500,000 people; 

Whereas following a trip to postearthquake Haiti, Chef Jose ́

Andres founded World Central Kitchen, a group of chefs 

committed to developing creative solutions to hunger and 

poverty; 

Whereas World Central Kitchen has provided fresh, nutritious meals from locally sourced ingredients in disaster 

zones in the United States and internationally; 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1080 IH 

Whereas World Central Kitchen, through local partners including Bryan Caswell’s Reef Restaurant, the Texas Children’s Hospital, and the George R. Brown Convention 

Center, provided over 20,000 meals to victims of Hurricane Harvey in Houston, Texas; 

Whereas World Central Kitchen and the 

#ChefsForPuertoRico volunteer network have provided 

more than 3.6 million meals to individuals impacted by 

Hurricane Maria in Puerto Rico; 

Whereas World Central Kitchen and the #ChefsForCalifornia 

volunteer network have provided more than 50,000 meals 

to individuals impacted by the 2018 California wildfires, 

and 50,000 meals to individuals impacted by the 2017 

California wildfires; 

Whereas World Central Kitchen and the 

#ChefsForGuatemala volunteer network have provided 

more than 300,000 meals to victims of the Fuego Volcano eruption; and 

Whereas World Central Kitchen has provided more than 

80,000 meals to victims of Hurricane Florence in North 

Carolina and South Carolina: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) recognizes the leadership of Chef Jose ́ An3 dres in founding World Central Kitchen and pro4 viding nutritious, fresh meals in multiple disaster 

5 zones; 

6 (2) applauds the selfless and heroic efforts of 

7 the many volunteer chefs who have contributed to 

8 disaster relief efforts; and 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 1080 IH 

1 (3) encourages the United States Agency for 

2 International Development, the Federal Emergency 

3 Management Agency, and other United States agen4 cies involved in disaster responses to incorporate 

5 best practices from World Central Kitchen and its 

6 volunteer networks of chefs and to increase the 

7 availability of fresh and nutritious food in the con8 text of disaster response. 

Æ 


pamtmann on DSKBFK8HB2PROD with BILLS
Abatement Order filed September 14, 2012.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-12-00429-CR

NO. 14-12-00432-CR

____________

CHARLES ALLEN DONELLY, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 435th District Court

Montgomery County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. 11-12-13328-CR & 11-12-13327-CR

ABATEMENT ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due May 21, 2012. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.1. 

On June 15, 2012, this court granted a motion for extension of time for Heather Deiss to 

file her portion of the record. The record was not filed. No further extension of time was 

requested.

On July 18, 2012, this court ordered Heather Deiss to file her portion of the record 

within 30 days and instructed the court reporter that if the record was not filed, the court 

would order the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine the reason for failure to file 
2

the record. The record has not been filed with the court. The trial and appellate courts 

are jointly responsible for ensuring that the appellate record is timely filed. See Tex. R. 

App. P. 35.3(c). It is the duty of the trial court to ensure that its reporter's work is timely 

accomplished by setting work priorities. Tex. R. App. P. 13.3. Because the reporter’s 

record has not been filed timely as ordered, we issue the following order.

We direct the judge of the 435th District Court to conduct a hearing at which the 

court reporter, appellant’s counsel, and appellee’s counsel shall participate to (a) determine 

the reason for failure to file the record; (b) establish a date certain when the reporter’s 

record will be filed, and (c) make findings as to whether the court reporter should be held in 

contempt of court for failing to file the reporter’s record timely as ordered. We order the 

court to prepare a record, in the form of a reporter’s record, of the hearing. The judge shall 

make findings of fact and conclusions of law, and shall order the trial clerk to forward to 

this court a supplemental clerk’s record containing the findings and conclusions. The 

hearing record and supplemental clerk’s record shall be filed with the clerk of this court 

within 30 days of the date of this order. 

The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this court’s active 

docket. The appeal will be reinstated on this court’s active docket when the trial court’s 

findings and recommendations are filed in this court. The court will also consider an 

appropriate motion to reinstate the appeal filed by either party, or the court may reinstate 

the appeal on its own motion. If the court reporter files the record prior to the date set for 

the hearing, the appeal will be reinstated and the trial court need not hold a hearing.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Frost, Christopher, and Jamison.
ex10-39.htm


    
      

    

    Exhibit
10-39

    
      


      


       

       

       

       

       

       

       

      January 29,
2010

      


      Mr.
Gary R. Leidich

      4672 Barnsleigh
Drive

      Fairlawn, OH
44333

      


      Dear
Gary:

      


      Based on our
discussions and the terms of the employment agreement (“Agreement”) dated
February 26, 2008, please accept this as a request to extend your employment
under the Agreement for an additional year, until June 30, 2011. This extension
is based on the terms of the original Agreement. The term of this Agreement
shall be from the date so agreed; unless either terminated early by either party
for any reason upon written notice given 60 days in advance, or mutually
extended in writing.

      


       

       

      
        	 
    	
                Sincerely,

              
	 	 
	 
    	 
    
	 
    	 
    
	 
    	
                Anthony J.
      Alexander

              
	 
    	
                President
      & Chief Executive Officer

              


      

      


       

      
 

      
        	
                So Agreed: 
      

              	 
    	 


      

      


      


      
        	
                Date:
§ 429.21 Residential clothes dryers. ( a ) *Sampling plan for selection of units for testing.* ( 1 ) The requirements of § 429.11 are applicable to clothes dryers; and
( 2 ) For each basic model of clothes dryers a sample of sufficient size shall be randomly selected and tested to ensure that— ( i ) Any represented value of estimated annual operating cost, energy consumption or other measure of energy consumption of a basic model for which consumers would favor lower values shall be greater than or equal to the higher of: ( A ) The mean of the sample, where: Or,
( B ) The upper 971 ⁄ 2 percent confidence limit (UCL) of the true mean divided by 1.05, where: and
( ii ) Any represented value of the energy factor, combined energy factor, or other measure of energy consumption of a basic model for which consumers would favor higher values shall be less than or equal to the lower of: ( A ) The mean of the sample, where: Or,
( B ) The lower 971 ⁄ 2 percent confidence limit (LCL) of the true mean divided by 0.95, where:
( 3 ) The capacity of a basic model reported in accordance with paragraph (b)(2) of this section shall be the mean of the capacities measured for each tested unit of the basic model.
( b ) *Certification reports.* ( 1 ) The requirements of § 429.12 are applicable to clothes dryers; and
( 2 ) Pursuant to § 429.12(b)(13), a certification report shall include the following public product-specific information: When using appendix D1 to subpart B of part 430 of this chapter, the combined energy factor in pounds per kilowatt hours (lb/kWh), the capacity in cubic feet (cu ft), the voltage in volts (V) (for electric dryers only), an indication if the dryer has automatic termination controls, and the hourly Btu rating of the burner (for gas dryers only); when using appendix D2 to subpart B of part 430, the combined energy factor in pounds per kilowatt hours (lb/kWh), the capacity in cubic feet (cu ft), the voltage in volts (V) (for electric dryers only), an indication if the dryer has automatic termination controls, the hourly Btu rating of the burner (for gas dryers only), and a list of the cycle setting selections for the energy test cycle as recorded in section 3.4.7 of appendix D2 to subpart B of part 430.
( c ) *Reported values.* Values reported pursuant to this section must be rounded as follows: CEF to the nearest 0.01 lb/kWh, capacity to the nearest 0.1 cu ft, voltage to the nearest V, and hourly Btu rating to the nearest Btu.
[76 FR 12451, Mar. 7, 2011; 76 FR 24767, May 2, 2011, as amended at 78 FR 49644, Aug. 14, 2013; 86 FR 56638, Oct. 8, 2021]
§ 590.208 Small volume exports. ( a ) *Small-scale natural gas exports.* Small-scale natural gas exports are deemed to be consistent with the public interest under section 3(a) of the Natural Gas Act, 15 U.S.C. 717b(a). DOE will issue an export authorization upon receipt of any complete application to conduct small-scale natural gas exports. DOE's regulations regarding notice of applications, 10 CFR 590.205, and procedures applicable to application proceedings, 10 CFR part 590, subpart C (10 CFR 590.303 to 10 CFR 590.317), are not applicable to small-scale natural gas exports.
( b ) *Scientific, experimental, or other non-utility natural gas exports.* Any person may export up to 100,000 cubic feet of natural gas (14.73 pounds per square inch at 60 degrees Fahrenheit) or the liquefied or compressed equivalent thereof, in a single shipment for scientific, experimental, or other non-utility gas use without prior authorization of the Assistant Secretary.
[83 FR 35119, July 25, 2018]
§ 5.545 Pre-employment inquiries. ( a ) *Marital status.* A recipient shall not make pre-employment inquiry as to the marital status of an applicant for employment, including whether such applicant is “Miss” or “Mrs.”
( b ) *Sex.* A recipient may make pre-employment inquiry as to the sex of an applicant for employment, but only if such inquiry is made equally of such applicants of both sexes and if the results of such inquiry are not used in connection with discrimination prohibited by these Title IX regulations.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

OFFICE OF THE CLERK

POST OFFICE BOX 711

M ONTGOM ERY, ALABA M A 36101-0711

DEBRA P. HA CKETT 

TELEPHONE: 

 CLERK 

334 954-3600 

July 9, 2007

NOTICE

TO: ALL COUNSEL OF RECORD:

You are hereby notified that the jury list and jurors’ profiles for the term of court

beginning 7/23/2007 will be available at 3:30 p.m. on 7/20/2007, in the Jury Assembly Room

(B-108), first floor, Frank M. Johnson, Jr. United States Courthouse Annex, One Church

Street, Montgomery, Alabama. The Court instructs counsel that the profiles are

CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENTS and should be treated as such. The information will now

be provided in electronic media (disc) only. Counsel MUST return ALL discs to the

Courtroom Deputy on the morning of jury selection.

The attached Juror Questionnaire Certification must be signed by counsel of record.

If counsel designates an alternate person to obtain the juror profiles the designee must also

sign the Juror Questionnaire Certification. The Juror Questionnaire Certification must be

submitted to the Jury Administrator/Clerk’s office at the time the juror profiles are obtained.

(This document can be found on our website at www.almd.uscourts.gov).

Case 2:06-cv-00766-MHT-TFM Document 77 Filed 07/09/2007 Page 1 of 1
Case 2:06-cv-00766-MHT-TFM Document 77-2 Filed 07/09/2007 Page 1 of 1
Case 2:06-cv-00766-MHT-TFM Document 77-4 Filed 07/09/2007 Page 1 of 4
Case 2:06-cv-00766-MHT-TFM Document 77-4 Filed 07/09/2007 Page 2 of 4
Case 2:06-cv-00766-MHT-TFM Document 77-4 Filed 07/09/2007 Page 3 of 4
Case 2:06-cv-00766-MHT-TFM Document 77-4 Filed 07/09/2007 Page 4 of 4
IV 

House Calendar No. 85 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 439 

[Report No. 109–221] 

Providing for the consideration of the resolution (H. Res. 437) to establish 

the Select Bipartisan Committee to Investigate the Preparation for and 

Response to Hurricane Katrina. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 14, 2005 

Mr. DREIER, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; 

which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for the consideration of the resolution (H. Res. 

437) to establish the Select Bipartisan Committee to 

Investigate the Preparation for and Response to Hurricane Katrina. 

1 Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution 

2 it shall be in order without intervention of any point of 

3 order to consider in the House the resolution (H. Res. 

4 437) to establish the Select Bipartisan Committee to In5 vestigate the Preparation for and Response to Hurricane 

6 Katrina. The resolution shall be considered as read. The 
2 

HRES 439 RH 

1 previous question shall be considered as ordered on the 

2 resolution to final adoption without intervening motion ex3 cept: (1) one hour of debate equally divided and controlled 

4 by the chairman and ranking minority member of the 

5 Committee on Rules; and (2) one motion to recommit 

6 which may not contain instructions. 

House Calendar No. 85 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 439 

[Report No. 109–221] 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for the consideration of the resolution 

Response to Hurricane Katrina. Committee to Investigate the Preparation for and (H. Res. 437) to establish the Select Bipartisan 

SEPTEMBER 14, 2005 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed
#### Keith Brown, Plaintiff, v Jeffrey Governele et al., Defendants. Trief & Olk, Nonparty Appellant; Harry I. Katz, P.C., Nonparty Respondent.

[815 NYS2d 651]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, nonparty Trief & Olk, the plaintiff’s current attorney, appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Lewis, J.), dated April 28, 2005, which granted its motion only to the extent of awarding it 60% of the net contingency fee in the action and awarding Harry I. Katz, P.C., the plaintiff’s former attorney, 40% of the net contingency fee in the action.

Ordered that the order is modified, on the facts and as a matter of discretion, by deleting the provision thereof granting the motion to the extent of awarding Trief & Olk 60% of the net contingency fee and awarding Harry I. Katz, EC., 40% of the net contingency fee and substituting therefor a provision granting the motion to the extent of awarding Trief & Olk 95% of the *618net contingency fee and Harry I. Katz, P.G., 5% of the net contingency fee in the action; as so modified, the order is affirmed, with costs to the appellant payable by the respondent.

Harry I. Katz, EC., the outgoing counsel, commenced this action on the plaintiffs behalf. Trief & Oik, the incoming counsel, filed an amended summons and complaint on behalf of the plaintiff, conducted discovery, successfully opposed a motion for summary judgment on the issue of the liability of the defendant Federal Express Corporation, and represented the plaintiff at mediation, which resulted in a settlement for the sum of $300,000.

Considering the amount of time spent by the attorneys on the case, the nature of the work performed, and the relative contributions of counsel *(see Lai Ling Cheng v Modansky Leasing Co.,*73 NY2d 454, 458 [1989]; *Podbielski v KMO 361 Realty Assoc.,*6 AD3d 597 [2004]; *Matter of Gary E. Rosenberg, P.C. v McCormack,*250 AD2d 679 [1998]), we find that the Supreme Court’s assessment of the legal services provided by Harry I. Katz, P.C., was significantly overvalued and constituted an improvident exercise of discretion *(see Podbielski v KMO 361 Realty Assoc., supra; Lanfranchi v Polatsch,*246 AD2d 513 [1998]; *Lai Ling Cheng v Modansky Leasing Co.,*153 AD2d 839 [1989]). Accordingly, we modify the apportionment of the attorney’s fee to the extent indicated herein. Miller, J.P., Ritter, Luciano, Spolzino and Dillon, JJ., concur.
`[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 474 Reported in House (RH)]







                                                  House Calendar No. 99
109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 474

                          [Report No. 109-242]

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
 bill (H.R. 2360) making appropriations for the Department of Homeland 
 Security for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2006, and for other 
                               purposes.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 29, 2005

   Mr. Sessions, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION


 
Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
 bill (H.R. 2360) making appropriations for the Department of Homeland 
 Security for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2006, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order to consider the conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 
2360) making appropriations for the Department of Homeland Security for 
the fiscal year ending September 30, 2006, and for other purposes. All 
points of order against the conference report and against its 
consideration are waived. The conference report shall be considered as 
read.
                                                  House Calendar No. 99

109th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                              H. RES. 474

                          [Report No. 109-242]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

Waiving points of order against the conference report to accompany the 
 bill (H.R. 2360) making appropriations for the Department of Homeland 
 Security for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2006, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           September 29, 2005

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed`
#### Sidney Hausen, Respondent, v. Academy Printing & Specialty Co., Inc., Appellant.

In an action to recover salesman’s commissions upon an alleged agreed rate (first cause of action) and in *qwmtum meruit*(second cause of action), defendant appeals from an order of Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated August 14, 1969, which denied its motion to dismiss both causes of action in the amended complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211 (subd. [a], par. 5). Order modified, on the law and the facts, by inserting therein, immediately after the words *“*this motion is denied ”, the following: *“*as to the second cause of action and granted as to the first cause of action.” As so modified, order affirmed, without costs. Plaintiff claims that under the oral agreement upon which he sues commissions were to be paid him on all defendant’s completed sales to customers produced by him, either directly through his efforts on *793original orders or through either himself or defendant on reorders. In our opinion, the agreement would not be capable of performance within one year. Defendant’s liability under the contract would continue as long as the customers procured by plaintiff purchase and make payments to defendant. A contract whose performance is impossible within a year and which contains no express provision for termination within a year may not be enforced unless incorporated in a writing as prescribed by the Statute of Frauds *(Cohen*v. *Bartgis Bros. Co.,*264 App. Div. 260, affd. 289 N. Y. 846). Therefore, we conclude that the defense of the Statute of Frauds is applicable and it was error for Special Term to have denied defendant’s motion to dismiss the first cause of action. Since the express contract is unenforceable by reason of the Statute of Frauds, plaintiff may not use the contract as evidence of the reasonable value of his services in *quantum meruit (Parver*v. *Matthews-Kadetsky Co.,*242 App. Div. 1). In our opinion, however, the amended complaint is adequate to afford plaintiff the opportunity to present other proof as to the reasonable value of his services. Christ, P. J., Hopkins, Kleinfeld, Brennan and Benjamin, JJ., concur.
#### § 52.2 Interpretations.

Except as specifically authorized by the Commission in writing, no interpretation of the meaning of the regulations in this part by any officer or employee of the Commission other than a written interpretation by the General Counsel will be recognized to be binding upon the Commission.
Case 2:06-cr-00193-MEF-CSC Document 24-2 Filed 08/31/2006 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:06-cr-00193-MEF-CSC Document 24-2 Filed 08/31/2006 Page 2 of 2
#### § 50.76 Licensee's change of status; financial qualifications.

An electric utility licensee holding an operating license (including a renewed license) for a nuclear power reactor, no later than seventy-five (75) days prior to ceasing to be an electric utility in any manner not involving a license transfer under § 50.80, shall provide the NRC with the financial qualifications information that would be required for obtaining an initial operating license as specified in § 50.33(f)(2). The financial qualifications information must address the first full five years of operation after the date the licensee ceases to be an electric utility.

[69 FR 4448, Jan. 30, 2004]