alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           4,413
<SECURITIES>                                   730,858
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,437,020
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               787,573
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,172,291
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          262,124
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   1,910,167
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,172,291
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                38,248
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                14,618
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    23,630
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
226 So.2d 771

#### Cecelia Ann KELLER, Widow of Paul Erwin JOHNSON, et al. v. WALLACE INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTORS et al.

No. 50023.

Oct. 8, 1969.

In re: Wallace Industrial Constructors and Trinity Universal Insurance Company applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of East Baton Rouge. 224 So.2d 31.

Writ refused. The judgment is correct.
ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE





Reference
is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of March 1, 2013, by and among DEUTSCHE MORTGAGE &
ASSET RECEIVING CORPORATION, as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL
ASSOCIATION, as Special Servicer, U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee, and DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS, as Certificate
Administrator, Paying Agent and Custodian, and PARK BRIDGE LENDER SERVICES LLC as Operating Advisor with respect to Commercial
Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series COMM 2013-CCRE6 (the “Agreement”). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise
defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.



Pursuant
to Section 10.11 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify
that:



|1. |  | A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from January 1,
2014 through December 31, 2014 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance per the Agreement during such period
has been made under my supervision, and
|-- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. |  | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled
all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.
|-- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 6th day of March 2015.









Daniel
Bober

Executive
Vice President

Wells
Fargo Bank















|Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. |  | 
|---------------------- |  |
#### MT. VERNON TRUST CO. et al. v. PENFIELD et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

June 11, 1914.)

Action by the Mt. Vernon Trust Company and another against James T. Penfield, individually, etc., and others.

No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.
EX-31 Rule13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications.

 

 

I, Leland F. Bunch,III, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewedthis report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed inrespect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of the Morgan StanleyBank of America Merrill Lynch Trust 2013-C8 (the "Exchange Act periodicreports");

 

2. Based on myknowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3. Based on myknowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required tobe provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is includedin the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4. Based on myknowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report underItem 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Actperiodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under theservicing agreements in all material respects; and

 

5. All of the reportson assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securitiesand their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance withservicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in thisreport in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except asotherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliancedescribed in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving thecertifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me bythe following unaffiliated parties:

 

Wells Fargo Bank,National Association, as Master Servicer, NS Servicing II, LLC, as Special Servicer,U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, Wells Fargo Bank, NationalAssociation, as Certificate Administrator, Wells Fargo Bank, NationalAssociation, as Custodian, Situs Holdings, LLC, as Trust Advisor, CoreLogicCommercial Real Estate Services, Inc., as Servicing Function Participant,National Tax Search, LLC, as Servicing Function Participant, Midland LoanServices, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, as Primary Servicer forthe Chrysler East Building Mortgage Loan, Midland Loan Services, a Division ofPNC Bank, National Association, as Special Servicer for the Chrysler EastBuilding Mortgage Loan, U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee for theChrysler East Building Mortgage Loan, U.S. Bank National Association, asCertificate Administrator for the Chrysler East Building Mortgage Loan, WellsFargo Bank, National Association, as Custodian for the Chrysler East BuildingMortgage Loan, and Situs Holdings, LLC, as Trust Advisor for the Chrysler EastBuilding Mortgage Loan.

 

 

 

Dated: March 29, 2018

 

 

/s/ Leland F. Bunch,III

 

 

Chief ExecutiveOfficer and President 

(senior officer in charge ofsecuritization of the depositor)
### Loss of sagebrush ecosystems and declining bird populations in the Intermountain West: Priority research issues and information needs

By: Water Resources Division, U.S. Geological Survey

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/fs12202

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (500 KB pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
Amendment No. 4 to the Avis Budget Group, Inc. 2007 Equity and Incentive Plan



 Exhibit 10.11(e) 
 Amendment to Avis Budget Group, Inc. 
 2007 Equity
and Incentive Plan 
 This Amendment, dated as of January 27, 2010 is made to the Avis Budget Group, Inc. 2007 Equity
and Incentive Plan (the “Plan”). Capitalized terms used but not defined herein have the meanings ascribed to them in the Plan. 
 WHEREAS, Avis Budget Group, Inc. (the “Company”) has adopted the Plan; and 
 WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 8(d) of the Plan, the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”) has the right to amend the Plan from time to time; and 
 WHEREAS, the Board deems it advisable to clarify and amend the Plan; 
 NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows: 
  

	1.	Section 8(a) of the Plan is hereby deleted and replaced in its entirety with the following: 

 “(a) Nontransferability. Awards shall not be transferable by a Grantee except by will or the laws of descent and distribution and
shall be exercisable during the lifetime of a Grantee only by such Grantee or his guardian or legal representative. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Committee may, in its sole discretion, permit an Award to be transferred to a “family
member” (within the meaning of Section A.1.(a)(5) of the general instructions of Form S-8) for estate planning purposes and for no value, provided that such transfer shall only be valid upon execution of a written instrument in form and
substance acceptable to the Committee in its sole discretion evidencing such transfer and the transferee’s acceptance thereof signed by the Grantee and the transferee, and provided, further, that such Award may not be subsequently transferred
other than by will or by the laws of descent and distribution or to another “family member” (as permitted by the Committee in its sole discretion) in accordance with the terms of the Plan and the applicable Award agreement, and shall
remain subject to the terms of the Plan and the applicable Award agreement. In addition, an Award shall not be assigned, negotiated, pledged or hypothecated in any way (except as provided by law or herein), and an Award shall not be subject to
execution, attachment or similar process. Upon any attempt to transfer an Award or in the event of any levy upon an Award by reason of any execution, attachment or similar process contrary to the provisions of the Plan or the applicable Award
agreement, such transfer shall be void and of no effect and the Company shall have the right to disregard the same on its books and records and to issue “stop transfer” instructions to its transfer agent.” 
  

	2.	This Amendment shall be governed by, interpreted under and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Delaware, without giving effect to the conflict of laws
principles thereof. 

  

	3.	Except as modified by this Amendment, the Plan is hereby confirmed in all respects. 








 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment has been duly executed and delivered as of the date and
year first written above. 
  

			
	AVIS BUDGET GROUP, INC.
	
	 /s/ Jean Marie Sera

	By:    Jean Marie Sera
	Title: Senior Vice President and Secretary

  

 2
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 29 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 29

Honoring the United States Army Volunteer Reserve for its dedicated and 
distinguished service to veterans and communities in need in the United 
                                States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 4, 2005

 Ms. Millender-McDonald submitted the following resolution; which was 
             referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Honoring the United States Army Volunteer Reserve for its dedicated and 
distinguished service to veterans and communities in need in the United 
                                States.

Whereas the United States Army Volunteer Reserve (USAVR) continues its primary 
        mission of rendering final military honors to the families of deceased 
        veterans and has to date rendered more than 5,000 final military honors 
        services at no cost to the families or taxpayers;
Whereas the USAVR continues to work with and train other military and veterans 
        organizations in rendering final military honors;
Whereas the USAVR is working in conjunction with military and civil authorities 
        in the training and preparation for their secondary mission of being a 
        force structure multiplier in civil emergencies and mass casualty 
        situations through individual and organizational civic emergency 
        management training;
Whereas the USAVR has provided no-cost wellness care to disadvantaged or 
        homeless persons; and
Whereas the USAVR continues to flourish due to its enlightened leadership and 
        the dedication of its members: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved,  That the House of Representatives recognizes and honors 
the USAVR for its dedicated and distinguished service to veterans and 
communities in need in the United States.
                                 <all>
```
Subpart 2019.7 - Subcontracting With Small

Business, Small Disadvantaged Business, and

Women-Owned Small Business Concerns

Parent topic: PART 2019 - SMALL BUSINESS PROGRAMS

2019.705 Responsibilities of the contracting officer under

the subcontracting assistance program.

2019.705-4 Reviewing the subcontracting plan.

The contracting officer may accept the terms of an overall or “master” company subcontracting plan

incorporated by reference into a specific subcontracting plan submitted by the apparent successful

offeror/bid for a specific contract, only upon ensuring that the required information, goals, and

assurances are included in accordance with FAR 19.704.
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D19-0166

_____________________________

JAMES JOHNSON,

Appellant,

v.

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF 

CORRECTIONS,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Hamilton County.

Andrew J. Decker, III, Judge.

February 28, 2019

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of Appellant’s response to the Court’s 

order of January 14, 2019, the Court has determined that the 

appeal is untimely. 

In order to timely invoke the Court’s appellate jurisdiction, a 

notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days of rendition of the 

order to be reviewed. Fla. R. App. P. 9.110(b). The thirtieth day 

following rendition of the order on appeal was January 2, 2019. 

Thus, the notice of appeal, filed on January 3, 2019, failed to 

invoke the Court’s appellate jurisdiction in a timely manner. 

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. 
2

ROBERTS, WETHERELL, and MAKAR, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

James Johnson, pro se, Appellant.

No appearance for Appellee.
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended
      September 30, 2008 (the “Report”) of Patient Safety Technologies, Inc. (the
“Registrant”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
      hereof, I, William B. Horne, as the Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge,
      that:





(1)
      the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and


(2)
      the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Registrant.




Dated:
                November 14, 2008
            By:
            /s/ Mary
              A.
              LayMary
              A. LayInterim
                Chief Financial Officer






A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
2007-2291.

#### Gonzales v. Smith.

In Habeas Corpus. On petition for writ of habeas corpus of Erby Gonzales. Sua sponte, cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.
#### In the Matter of John J. McPartland v. Thomas F. McCoy.

Motion to dismiss appeal and appeal transferred to Appellate Division, Third Department, for hearing and determination, pursuant to CPLR 5711. Concur — Eager, J. P., Capozzoli, McGivern, Nunez and Steuer, JJ.
§ 71.8 Deliberate misconduct. ( a ) This section applies to any— ( 1 ) Licensee;
( 2 ) Certificate holder;
( 3 ) Quality assurance program approval holder;
( 4 ) Applicant for a license, certificate, or quality assurance program approval;
( 5 ) Contractor (including a supplier or consultant) or subcontractor, to any person identified in paragraph (a)(4) of this section; or
( 6 ) Employees of any person identified in paragraphs (a)(1) through (a)(5) of this section.
( b ) A person identified in paragraph (a) of this section who knowingly provides to any entity, listed in paragraphs (a)(1) through (a)(5) of this section, any components, materials, or other goods or services that relate to a licensee's, certificate holder's, quality assurance program approval holder's, or applicant's activities subject to this part may not: ( 1 ) Engage in deliberate misconduct that causes or would have caused, if not detected, a licensee, certificate holder, quality assurance program approval holder, or any applicant to be in violation of any rule, regulation, or order; or any term, condition or limitation of any license, certificate, or approval issued by the Commission; or
( 2 ) Deliberately submit to the NRC, a licensee, a certificate holder, quality assurance program approval holder, an applicant for a license, certificate or quality assurance program approval, or a licensee's, applicant's, certificate holder's, or quality assurance program approval holder's contractor or subcontractor, information that the person submitting the information knows to be incomplete or inaccurate in some respect material to the NRC.
( c ) A person who violates paragraph (b)(1) or (b)(2) of this section may be subject to enforcement action in accordance with the procedures in 10 CFR part 2, subpart B.
( d ) For the purposes of paragraph (b)(1) of this section, deliberate misconduct by a person means an intentional act or omission that the person knows: ( 1 ) Would cause a licensee, certificate holder, quality assurance program approval holder, or applicant for a license, certificate, or quality assurance program approval to be in violation of any rule, regulation, or order; or any term, condition, or limitation of any license or certificate issued by the Commission; or
( 2 ) Constitutes a violation of a requirement, procedure, instruction, contract, purchase order, or policy of a licensee, certificate holder, quality assurance program approval holder, applicant, or the contractor or subcontractor of any of them.
exv10w47






EXHIBIT 10.47




WRITTEN SUMMARY OF THE MATERIAL TERMS OF

THE MANHATTAN ASSOCIATES, INC. CASH INCENTIVE PLAN*




          The Cash Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) is a performance-based compensation plan for participants
approved by the Compensation Committee whereby such participants may receive cash payouts in the
event the company achieves performance targets for total company revenue and total company adjusted
earnings per share (“Adjusted EPS”). The Plan includes targets for each quarter that reflect the
year-to-date goals for that quarter as well as an annual goal. Total company revenues and Adjusted
EPS each constitute 50% of a participant’s total cash incentive opportunity. Incentives are
payable quarterly.




          Cash incentives are not payable below a threshold amount, and are payable at 100% of the
participant’s cash incentive opportunity upon achievement of target goals. If full year target
goals are exceeded, incentives are payable to a maximum of 200% of the participant’s target cash
incentive opportunity (after accounting for previously made quarterly payments). Incentives are
payable on a straight line ratable basis for performance between threshold and target goals, and
target and above-target goals.




          For purposes of the Plan:





	 	•	 	Total company revenues exclude hardware revenue and billed travel revenue.
	 
	 	•	 	Adjusted EPS is the company’s earnings per share after excluding amortization of
intangible assets, stock-based compensation expenses, restructuring charges, asset
impairment charges, sales tax recoveries and unusual tax adjustments. The earnings per
share benefit from common stock repurchases, if applicable, is also eliminated from the
calculation of the Adjusted EPS portion of annual incentives.
	 
	 	•	 	Achievement of revenue and Adjusted EPS goals will be determined on a constant currency
basis, meaning that the actual financial results of each of the company’s foreign
subsidiaries will be translated into U.S. Dollars at budgeted exchange rates.





          The Compensation Committee is empowered to interpret and make determinations regarding the
Plan. The Compensation Committee may terminate, suspend or amend the Plan, in whole or in part
from time to time, including the adoption of amendments deemed necessary or desirable to correct
any defect or supply omitted data or to reconcile any inconsistency or discrepancy in the Plan or
in any award granted thereunder, without the consent of any affected participant.




          In order to be eligible for an award under the Plan, a participant must be actively employed
by the company through the date of payment. If a participant’s employment terminates for any
reason prior to such date of payment, the participant will not be eligible for any unpaid awards
under the Plan, and no unpaid awards under the Plan will be paid to the participant.






 




			
	*	 	This summary does not constitute the entirety
of the Plan as adopted by the Compensation Committee.