alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
.?!"'"'""""' Miami-Dade County Public Schools 

~ · · · ·. · ·• giving our students the wOrld 

Superintendent of Schools 

Alberto M. Carvalho 

April 2, 2015 

U. S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Operations, M-30 

West Building ground floor, 

-RoomWI2-J40 ---- -~-

1200New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

DOCKET#: 

EXEMPTION#: 

FAA-2000-7997 

7560F 

Miami-Dade County School Board 

Perla Tabares Hantman, Chair 

Dr. Lawrence S. F_eldman, Vice Chair 

Dr. Dorothy Bendross-Mindingall 

Susie V Castillo 

Dr. Wilbert "Tee" Holloway 

Dr. Martin Karp 

Lubby Navarro 

Dr. Marta Perez 

Raquel A. Regalado 

---~-----

SUBJECT: REQUEST TO EXTEND EXEMPTION NO. 7560F FROM 14CFR (FAR SECTION) 

-PART: 65.17 (a) 65.19(b); 65.75. 

DearS irs: 

George T Baker Aviation Technical College is requesting an extension of the following exemption that will expire on June 30, 2015: 

Exemption No. 7560F from 14 CFR (FAR Section)-

Part: 65.17 (a); 

65.19 (b); 

65.75. 

This exemption continues to have a pos1t1ve impact on the enrollment and the number of licensed Airframe and Powerplant 

Technicians graduating from George T. Baker Aviation Technical College. The college offers the Federal Aviation Administration 

approved Airframe and Powerplant Aviation Maintenance Curriculum under Air Agency Certificate Number CT9T072R. 

Your approval of this extension-will be greatly appreciated. 

Respectfully Submitted, 

Rene Mantilla, Principal 

cc: Mr. Ernst Biamby, Jr. 

Federal Ayiation Administration Safety Inspector 

South Florida Flight Standards-District Office-19 

2895 S. W. 145thAvenue, Suite 120 

Miramar, Florida 33027 

.. :: 

·. : ·~ ... i~ .:J .... 

George T. Baker Aviation Technical College· 3275 N. W 42"a Avenue • Miami, Florida 33142. Mr. Rene Mantilla 

(Phone): 305-871~3143 • (FAX): 305-871-5840 • www.BakerAviation.edu
Electronically Filed 

Supreme Court 

SCPR-10-0000081 

29-OCT-2010 

03:39 PM 

SCPR-10-0000081 


IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I 

IN RE EDA U. SUH
 

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
 

ORDER GRANTING PETITION TO RESIGN AND SURRENDER LICENSE
 

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba and Duffy, JJ.,


and Intermediate Court of Appeals Chief Judge Nakamura,


assigned by reason of vacancy)
 

Upon consideration of the petition to resign and 

surrender license to practice law in the State of Hawai'i, 

submitted by Petitioner Eda U. Suh, filed pursuant to Rule 1.10 

of the Rules of the Supreme Court of the State of Hawai'i (RSCH), 

and in consideration of the affidavits and exhibits in support 

thereof, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition is granted. 


Petitioner shall surrender her license to practice law to the
 

Clerk forthwith.
 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to RSCH Rule 1.10(g), 


that Petitioner shall comply with the notice, affidavit, and
 

record requirements of RSCH Rules 2.16(a), (b), (d), and (g).
 

IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that the Clerk shall remove the
 
name of Petitioner Eda U. Suh, attorney number 6864, from the 

roll of attorneys of the State of Hawai'i, effective with the 

filing of this order. 

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, October 29, 2010. 

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald 

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama 

/s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr. 

/s/ James E. Duffy, Jr.
 

/s/ Craig H. Nakamura
 

2
# L_2023102EN.01009801.xml

| 17.4.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 102/98 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.4.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 102/98

---

UNILATERAL DECLARATION BY THE UNITED KINGDOM IN THE JOINT COMMITTEE ESTABLISHED BY THE AGREEMENT ON THE WITHDRAWAL OF THE UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND FROM THE EUROPEAN UNION AND THE EUROPEAN ATOMIC ENERGY COMMUNITY

of 24 March 2023

on the democratic consent mechanism in Article 18 of the Windsor Framework (1)

The United Kingdom notes that the joint solutions announced in Windsor are intended to constitute a series of practical and sustainable measures to address, in a definitive way, deficiencies and situations unforeseen that have emerged since the Protocol on Ireland/Northern Ireland (‘the Protocol’) entered into force.

The United Kingdom recognises the importance of ensuring that these arrangements are always able to command the broadest possible support across the community in Northern Ireland, in line with its responsibility to uphold the Good Friday or Belfast Agreement of 10 April 1998, including its subsequent implementation agreements and arrangements, in all its parts – and with regard to its specific responsibilities to respect the identity, ethos and aspirations of both communities. The democratic consent mechanism in Article 18 of the Windsor Framework provides an ongoing and important safeguard in that respect, alongside which the United Kingdom is committed to commissioning an independent review in the circumstances set out in its Unilateral Declaration on consent (2). In any such circumstances, whether following the first exercise of the democratic consent mechanism or thereafter, the United Kingdom commits to bring the recommendations of the review to the Joint Committee, recognising the responsibility of the Joint Committee under Article 164 of the Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community to consider any matter of interest relating to an area covered by the Windsor Framework, and to seek appropriate ways and methods of preventing problems that might arise in areas covered by the Windsor Framework.

2

---

(1)  See Joint Declaration No 1/2023.

1

(2)  Declaration by Her Majesty's Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland concerning the operation of the 'Democratic consent in Northern Ireland' provision of the Protocol on Ireland/Northern Ireland.

2

---
MP

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 18-0499

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

SCOTT STEVEN FJELSTED,

Defendant and Appellant.

GRANT OF EXTENSION

Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 30-day extension of time, 

and good cause appearing therefor, Appellee is granted an extension of time to 

and including May 5, 2020, within which to prepare, serve, and file its response 

brief.

Electronically signed by:

Bowen Greenwood

Clerk of the Supreme Court

April 1 2020

04/01/2020

Case Number: DA 18-0499

FILED

Bowen Greenwood

CLERK OF THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF MONTANA

04/01/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0557
Exhibit 13

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of CNH Industrial N.V. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2013 of the Company as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned officers of the Company does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



By:

/s/ Richard TobinRichard TobinChief Executive OfficerBy:

/s/ Massimiliano ChiaraMassimiliano ChiaraChief Financial Officer


Dated April 25, 2014

A signed original of this written statement has been provided to CNH Industrial N.V. and will be retained by CNH Industrial N.V. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C §1350 and is not being filed as part
of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-1986

In Re: US AIRWAYS, INCORPORATED,

Debtor.

----------------------------------

FOUGERE HOLCOMBE,

Creditor – Appellant,

v.

US AIRWAYS, INCORPORATED,

Debtor - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior

District Judge. (1:11-cv-00586-CMH-IDD; 04-13819-SSM)

Submitted: March 20, 2012 Decided: March 27, 2012

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and SHEDD and DAVIS, Circuit 

Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Vladimir Matsiborchuk, New York, New York, for Appellant. Sarah 

Beckett Boehm, MCGUIREWOODS, LLP, Richmond, Virginia; Douglas 

Michael Foley, MCGUIREWOODS, LLP, Norfolk, Virginia, for 

Appellee.
2

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

Fougere Holcombe appeals the district court’s order

dismissing, as interlocutory, her appeal from the bankruptcy 

court’s March 22, 2011 order. We have reviewed the record and 

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the 

reasons stated by the district court. Holcombe v. US Airways, 

Inc., Nos. 1:11-cv-00586-CMH-IDD; 04-13819-SSM (E.D. Va. filed 

Aug. 10, 2011, and entered Aug. 11, 2011). We grant the motion 

to submit on briefs and dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

ANGELA DENISE NAILS, *

*

PLAINTIFF, * 1:06-CV-00737.WKW

*

vs. *

*

DOTHAN RESCUE MISSION, *

*

DEFENDANT. *

DEFENDANT S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF S RENEWED

MOTION FOR JUDGMENT

THE DEFENDANT, the Dothan Rescue Mission, responds to

the Plaintiff s Motion for Judgment  filed on or about

February 15, 2007, and moves the Court to Strike or Deny

that Motion. In support the Defendant states:

1. Nails labels her motion Motion for Judgment. 

Despite the label, this pleading appears to be a motion to

compel and/or a motion to amend the complaint. 

2. To the extent that the Motion is a motion to

compel, the Plaintiff did not discuss any alleged problems

in the discovery process with defense counsel before filing

the motion with this Court. The Plaintiff has failed to

make a good faith effort to obtain discovery material from

the Defendant or otherwise resolve the alleged discovery

problem before filing the motion with this Court. This is

Case 1:06-cv-00737-WKW-SRW Document 47 Filed 02/28/2007 Page 1 of 3
Page 2 of 3

in direct violation of Fed. R. Civ. P. 37. 

3. This Court s Orders of December 22, 2006 and

January 3, 2007 describe the proper process for the

Plaintiff to address any discovery issues. The Plaintiff

has not followed these Orders.

4. The Defendant properly responded to the

Plaintiff s written discovery pursuant to the Federal Rules

of Civil Procedure. 

5. The Defendant disclosed all relevant information

as required under Rule 26 in its initial disclosure packet

served on the Plaintiff on or about November 14, 2006.

6. The registration cards the Plaintiff complains of

in her Motion for Judgment were included in the initial

disclosure packet.

7. To the extent that the Motion for Judgment is a

motion to amend, the Plaintiff is seeking to amend far past

the established deadline. In relevant part, Paragraph 2 of

this Court s November 1, 2006 Scheduling Order reads: Any

Motions to Amend Pleadings and to add parties shall be filed

no later than November 28, 2006.  

8. The Plaintiff s attempt to amend her Complaint is

untimely, being filed some 80 plus days after the deadline

Case 1:06-cv-00737-WKW-SRW Document 47 Filed 02/28/2007 Page 2 of 3
Page 3 of 3

to amend. 

WHEREFORE the Defendant moves the Court TO STRIKE or TO

DENY the Plaintiff s Motion for Judgment.  

HARDWICK, HAUSE, SEGREST & WALDING

BY: /s/ Kevin Walding 

Kevin Walding (WAL036)

BY: /s/ Patrick B. Moody 

Patrick B. Moody (MOO110)

Attorneys for Defendant

Post Office Box 1469

Dothan, Alabama 36302

Phone (334)794-4144

Fax (334)671-9330

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that, this date, I have served a copy

of this document on the following individual(s) and/or

attorney(s) of record by placing same in the United States

Mail in a properly addressed envelope with prepaid postage.

Angela Denise Nails

342 South Saint Andrews Street

Apartment 808

Dothan, Alabama 36301

This the 28th day of February, 2007.

 /s/ Kevin Walding 

Of Counsel

Case 1:06-cv-00737-WKW-SRW Document 47 Filed 02/28/2007 Page 3 of 3
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

# AGENCY:

U.S. Department of Energy.

# ACTION:

Amended Record of Decision; Correction.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Department of Energy (DOE) published a document in the                         **Federal Register**                         of January 4, 2010, announcing an amended Record of Decision (ROD) for the Idaho High-Level Waste and Facilities Disposition Final Environmental Impact Statement. This document corrects an error in that notice.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Requests for additional information on this Amended ROD should be directed to Nolan R. Jensen, Federal Project Director, U.S. DOE Idaho Operations Office, 1955 Fremont Avenue, MS 1222, Idaho Falls, ID 83415, telephone (208) 526-5793.

## Correction

                        In the                         **Federal Register**                         of January 4, 2010, in FR Doc. E9-31151, please make the following correction:                    

                        On page 137, third column, under the heading DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY, the heading is corrected to read: Amended Record of Decision: Idaho High-Level Waste and Facilities                               ( print page 1616)                            Disposition Final Environmental Impact Statement                    

Issued in Washington, DC, on January 5, 2010.

Mark Gilbertson,

Acting Chief Technical Officer for Environmental Management.

[FR Doc. 2010-319 Filed 1-11-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
23000 Sussex Hwy. #226 Seaford, DE 19973 855-973-6476

August	26,	2015

U.S.	Department	of	Transportation

Docket	Management	System

1200	New	Jersey	Avenue,	SE

Washington,	DC	20590

RE:	Exemption	No.	11237	(FAA-2014-0591)	Utility	Aerial	Services,	Inc.

This	letter	is	a	request for	amendment	to	the	existing	Section	333	Exemption	No.	11237	to	

add	additional	aircraft	to	the	exemption	holders	authorized	commercial	operations.		On	

March	26,	2014,	the	FAA	granted	this	Petition	for	Exemption	to	conduct	commercial	

operations	using	small	unmanned	aircraft	systems.		Utility	Aerial	Services,	Inc.	now	seeks	an	

amendment	to	its	exemption	authorizing	the	operation	of	the	DJI	S-1000	and	the	Ascending	

Technologies	AscTec Falcon	8.

The	FAA	has	previously	granted	operations	of	the	AscTec	Falcon	8 under	(exemptions	

11208,	11268)	and	the	DJI	S-1000	(exemptions	11728,	12106).	

The	addition	of	these	aircraft	will	enhance	Utility	Aerial	Services	operational	capabilities	

without	any	change	to	the	safe	conduct	of	operations.

In	addition	we	request	that	the	point	of	contact	be	changed	to	the	following	for	all	

communications	and	notifications.

Utility	Aerial	Services,	Inc.

Attn:	William	R.	Alex

23000	Sussex	Highway,	#	226

Seaford,	DE		19973

855-973-6476

wralex@utilityaerial.com

Thank	you	for	your	prompt	attention	to	this	request	for	amendment.		Please	do	not	hesitate	

to	contact	me	if	you	should	have	any	questions.

Regards,

William	R.	Alex

President/CEO

Utility	Aerial	Services,	Inc.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

REGION 4 

ATLANTA FEDERAL CENTER 

61 FORSYTH STREET 

ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303·8960 

f4AN 1 5 2015 

Mr. David Bernhart 

Assistant Regional Administrator for Protected Resources 

National Marine Fisheries Service 

Southeast Regional Office 

263 13th A venue South 

St. Petersburg, Florida 33701 

Dear Mr. Bernhart: 

In a letter dated October 6, 2014, the Environmental Protection Agency transmitted to your 

office a Biological Assessment (BA) for the designation of an Ocean Dredged Material Disposal 

Site (ODMDS), offshore of Jacksonville, Florida. The BA was issued with respect to an 

Endangered Species Act Section 7 informal consultation for the action to designate an expanded 

ODMDS for an existing disposal site, in accordance with the Marine Protection, Research and 

Sanctuaries Act. The BA did not include consideration of the critical habitat for the distinct 

population segment of the Northwest Atlantic Ocean Loggerhead Sea Turtle, which was 

designated on July 10, 2014. We have revised the BA to include the EPA's consideration of this 

recently designated critical habitat (see enclosure). Consistent with our determination provided 

on October 6, 2014, the revised BA reflects our determination that the proposed action is not 

likely to affect any listed species or their critical habitat. 

If you have any questions regarding the ESA BA, please contact Mr. Chris McArthur at 

(404) 562-9391 or mcarthur.christopher@epa.gov. 

Enclosure 

Sincerely, 

~ Thomas McGill, Chief 

Ocean, Wetlands and Streams Protection Branch 

Water Protection Division 

cc: Patrick Griffin, USACE-SAJ (electronic w/ enclosure) 

Karla Reece, NMFS (electronic w/ enclosure) 

Debbie Tucker, FDEP (electronic w/ enclosure) 

Internet Address (URL) • http://www.epa.gov 

Recycled/Recyclable • Printed w~h Vegetable Oil Based Inks on Recycled Paper (Minimum 30% Postconsumer)
#### § 603.120 Contracting officer warrant requirements.

A contracting officer may award or administer a TIA only if the contracting officer's warrant authorizes the award or administration of a TIA.
IV 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 575 

Recognizing the religious and historical significance of the festival of Diwali. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 19, 2017 

Mr. KRISHNAMOORTHI (for himself, Ms. JAYAPAL, Mr. KHANNA, Ms. 

GABBARD, Mr. BERA, and Mr. CROWLEY) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the religious and historical significance of the 

festival of Diwali. 

Whereas for millions of Indian Americans, Diwali (or 

Deepavali) is a time for thanksgiving and prayer for 

health, knowledge and peace; 

Whereas this year, 2017, many Members of Congress will celebrate Diwali in the United States Capitol for the first 

time; 

Whereas Diwali, a festival of great significance to Indian 

Americans, is celebrated annually by Hindus, Sikhs, 

Jains, and others throughout the United States; 

Whereas Diwali is a festival of lights, during which celebrants 

light small oil lamps, place them around the home, and 

pray for health, knowledge and peace; 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 575 IH 

Whereas celebrants of Diwali believe that the rows of lamps 

symbolize the light within the individual that rids the 

soul of the darkness of ignorance; 

Whereas Diwali falls on the last day of the last month in the 

lunar calendar and is celebrated as a day of thanksgiving 

and the beginning of the New Year for many Hindus; 

Whereas for Hindus, Diwali is a celebration of the belief that 

light triumphs over darkness, and good triumphs over 

evil; 

Whereas for Sikhs, Diwali is feted as the day on which the 

sixth founding Sikh guru, Guru Hargobind, was released 

from captivity by the Mughal Emperor Jehangir; 

Whereas for Jains, Diwali marks the anniversary of the attainment of Nirvana by Lord Mahavira, the last of the 

Tirthankaras (founders of the Jain philosophy); and 

Whereas Diwali is a celebration of great importance in Indian 

American communities throughout the United States: 

Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) recognizes the historical and religious sig3 nificance of Diwali; 

4 (2) in observance of Diwali, the festival of 

5 lights, expresses its deepest respect for Indian Amer6 icans and the Indian Diaspora throughout the world 

7 on this significant occasion; 

8 (3) recognizes and appreciates the religious di9 versity in both India and the United States and 

10 throughout the world; and 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 575 IH 

1 (4) acknowledges and supports the relationship 

2 of collaboration and respect between the United 

3 States and India. 

Æ 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 722 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 722

    Supporting the goals and ideals of ``Black Women's Heart Health 
                           Awareness Week''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 2, 2018

Mr. Rush submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
    Supporting the goals and ideals of ``Black Women's Heart Health 
                           Awareness Week''.

Whereas heart disease and stroke are the number one killers of women, and stroke 
        disproportionately affects African-American women;
Whereas African-American women are less likely than Caucasian women to be aware 
        that heart disease is the leading cause of death;
Whereas cardiovascular diseases kill nearly 50,000 African-American women 
        annually;
Whereas of African-American women ages 20 and older, 49 percent have heart 
        disease;
Whereas only 1 in 5 African-American women believes she is personally at risk;
Whereas only 52 percent of African-American women are aware of the signs and 
        symptoms of a heart attack;
Whereas only 36 percent of African-American women know that heart disease is 
        their greatest health risk;
Whereas more than 40 percent of non-Hispanic African Americans have high blood 
        pressure, which is more severe in Blacks than Caucasians, and develops 
        earlier in life;
Whereas African Americans are disproportionately affected by obesity;
Whereas among non-Hispanic African Americans age 20 and older, 63 percent of men 
        and 77 percent of women are overweight or obese;
Whereas African Americans are more likely to have diabetes than non-Hispanic 
        Caucasians; and
Whereas the week of February 12, 2018, would be an appropriate week to designate 
        as ``Black Women's Heart Health Awareness Week'': Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives supports the goals and 
ideals of ``Black Women's Heart Health Awareness Week''.
                                 <all>
```