alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 1015.106 Subdivision of claims not authorized.

Debts may not be subdivided to avoid the monetary ceiling established by 31 U.S.C. 3711(a)(2). A debtor's liability arising from a particular transaction or contract shall be considered a single debt in determining whether the debt is one of less than $100,000 (excluding interest, penalties, and administrative costs) or such higher amount as the Attorney General shall from time to time prescribe for purposes of compromise or suspension or termination of collection activity.
Case 2:06-cv-00754-WC Document 5 Filed 09/18/2006 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:06-cv-00754-WC Document 5 Filed 09/18/2006 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:06-cv-00754-WC Document 5 Filed 09/18/2006 Page 3 of 3
2007-1289.

#### State v. Hall.

Putnam App. No. 12-07-08. Reported at 115 Ohio St.3d 1473, 2007-Ohio-5735, 875 N.E.2d 627. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.
§ 473.24 Final action and certification by manager. ( a ) Upon consideration of the recommendation of the interagency review panel and other pertinent information, the manager— ( 1 ) Shall determine whether the research and development to be performed complies with the standards and criteria of § 473.30;
( 2 ) Shall obtain the concurrence of the DOE if the manager is not an employee of the DOE;
( 3 ) Shall, in the event of a negative determination under this section, advise the applicant, in the case of a grant, cooperative agreement, or contract, and any interested person who filed a statement of objection; and
( 4 ) Shall, in the event of an affirmative determination under this section, prepare a certification— ( i ) Explaining the determination;
( ii ) Discussing any allegedly related or comparable industrial research and development considered and deemed to be an inadequate basis for not certifying the grant or contract;
( iii ) Discussing issues regarding cost sharing and patent rights related to the standards and criteria of § 473.30 of these regulations; and
( iv ) Discussing any other relevant issue.
( b ) After complying with paragraph (a) of this section, the manager shall sign the certification and distribute copies to the applicant, if any, and any interested person who filed a statement of objections— ( 1 ) Immediately in the case of a DOE or agency project; and
( 2 ) After the agreement has been negotiated in the case of a grant, cooperative agreement, or contract.
#### § 1710.121 Interest, penalties, and administrative charges.

Charges may be assessed for interest, penalties, and administrative charges in accordance with the FCCS, 31 CFR 901.9.
Editorial Note on Part 26
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 26 appear at 87 FR 71455, Nov. 22, 2022.

§ 26.417 Recordkeeping and reporting. ( a ) Licensees and other entities who implement FFD programs under this subpart shall ensure that records pertaining to the administration of the program, which may be stored and archived electronically, are maintained so that they are available for NRC inspection purposes and for any legal proceedings resulting from the administration of the program.
( b ) Licensees and other entities shall make the following reports: ( 1 ) Reports to the NRC Operations Center by telephone within 24 hours after the licensee or other entity discovers any intentional act that casts doubt on the integrity of the FFD program and any programmatic failure, degradation, or discovered vulnerability of the FFD program that may permit undetected drug or alcohol use or abuse by individuals who are subject to this subpart. These events must be reported under this subpart, rather than under the provisions of 10 CFR 73.1200; and
( 2 ) Annual program performance reports for the FFD program.
[73 FR 17176, Mar. 31, 2008, as amended at 88 FR 15880, Mar. 14, 2023]
exv10w64






Exhibit 10.64



SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE

PATRIOT COAL CORPORATION

EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN




          WHEREAS, Patriot Coal Corporation (the “Company”) adopted the Patriot Coal Corporation
Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “Plan”), as amended;




          WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Plan to provide for all employees of the Company and
its subsidiaries to participate in the Plan and to accurately reflect actions which can be taken by
the Company’s designee;





     NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows:



I.





Section 2.19 is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:




“Subsidiary” means a partnership, limited liability company or corporation, domestic or
foreign, of which 100% of the voting interests or shares are held by the Company or a
Subsidiary, whether or not such partnership, limited liability company or corporation now
exists or is hereafter organized or acquired by the Company or a Subsidiary.”



II.





Section 3.5 of the Plan is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:




“An Employee may elect to withdraw contributions made during an Offering Period by giving
written notice to the Company or its designee at least fifteen (15) calendar days before
the end of such Offering Period, in which case the cash credited to the Employee’s Option
Account will be refunded to the Employee without interest as soon as administratively
feasible after the Committee receives such notice, and the Employee may not re-enroll in
the Plan until the next Offering Period.”



III.





Section 5.1(a)(i) of the Plan is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:




“as of the beginning of the Offering Period that is at least fifteen (15) calendar days
after the Employee files with the Company or its designee a written notice of
discontinuance of contributions (except as provided in Section 1.1(a)(i));”



1









 





IV.




     The Plan shall otherwise remain unchanged and in full force and effect.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	PATRIOT COAL CORPORATION

 	 
	 	By:  	//Richard M. Whiting//
 	 
	 	 	Richard M. Whiting 	 
	 	 	Chief Executive Officer 	 
	 




2
#### Frances Ann Kremer, Minor, by Albert E. Kremer, Her Father and Next Friend, Appellee, v. The Vim Company, Appellant.

Gen. No. 41,187.

opinion filed June 19, 1940;

rehearing denied September 10, 1940.

Schuyler & Hennessy, for appellant; Lawrence Nelson, Jr., and Jay Stough, of counsel; W. A. Leopold and Julius F. Trefz, for appellee, Friedberg & Bublick, of counsel.

Opinion by

Justice Hebel.

“Not to be published in full.”
Editorial Note on Part 34
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 34 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

§ 34.33 Permanent radiographic installations. ( a ) Each entrance that is used for personnel access to the high radiation area in a permanent radiographic installation must have either: ( 1 ) An entrance control of the type described in § 20.1601(a)(1) of this chapter that reduces the radiation level upon entry into the area, or
( 2 ) Both conspicuous visible and audible warning signals to warn of the presence of radiation. The visible signal must be actuated by radiation whenever the source is exposed. The audible signal must be actuated when an attempt is made to enter the installation while the source is exposed.
( b ) The alarm system must be tested for proper operation with a radiation source each day before the installation is used for radiographic operations. The test must include a check of both the visible and audible signals. Entrance control devices that reduce the radiation level upon entry (designated in paragraph (a)(1) of this section) must be tested monthly. If an entrance control device or an alarm is operating improperly, it must be immediately labeled as defective and repaired within 7 calendar days. The facility may continue to be used during this 7-day period, provided the licensee implements the continuous surveillance requirements of § 34.51 and uses an alarming ratemeter. Test records for entrance controls and audible and visual alarm must be maintained in accordance with § 34.75.
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Otis Erisman, :

Appellant :

:

v. :

:

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, :

Department of Transportation, :

Bureau of Driver Licensing : No. 1030 C.D. 2015

O R D E R

NOW, May 10, 2016

, upon consideration of appellant’s “ application for

arg ument and reconsideration ” and appellee’ s answer in response thereto , the

application is denied.

MARY HANNAH LEAVITT,

President Judge
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 314 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 314

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                         June 14, 2005.
    Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker 
may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XVIII, declare the House resolved into the 
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of the 
bill (H.R. 2862) making appropriations for Science, the Departments of State, 
Justice, and Commerce, and related agencies for the fiscal year ending September 
30, 2006, and for other purposes. The first reading of the bill shall be 
dispensed with. All points of order against consideration of the bill are 
waived. General debate shall be confined to the bill and shall not exceed one 
hour equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member 
of the Committee on Appropriations. After general debate the bill shall be 
considered for amendment under the five-minute rule. Points of order against 
provisions in the bill for failure to comply with clause 2 of rule XXI are 
waived except for section 607. During consideration of the bill for amendment, 
the Chairman of the Committee of the Whole may accord priority in recognition on 
the basis of whether the Member offering an amendment has caused it to be 
printed in the portion of the Congressional Record designated for that purpose 
in clause 8 of rule XVIII. Amendments so printed shall be considered as read. 
When the committee rises and reports the bill back to the House with a 
recommendation that the bill do pass, the previous question shall be considered 
as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to final passage without 
intervening motion except one motion to recommit with or without instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
SERVED: OCTOBER 26, 2012 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

MOU:N"TAIN AVIATION 

FAA DOCKET No. [TO BE ASSIGNED] 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

DMS FAA-2012-0875 

AMENDED NOTICE OF HEARING DATE 

The Notice of Hearing Dates ("Notice"); served September 5, 2012, is hereby amended to 

change the· date of the hearing to November 27, 2012. In all other respects the Notice is 

unchanged. 

(!L~C-~ Richard C. Goodwin · pQ 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 

Attachment - Service List 
. SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC~430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W10001 

Kent S. Jackson, Respondent's Counsel 

Jackson & Wade, LLC 

2168 Midland Drive 

Shawnee, KS 66218 

TEL: 913-338-1700 

FAJ(: 913-338-1755 

ONE COPY 

·Kyle E. Lomazow, Complainant's Counsel 

Attorney, Office ofRegional Counsel 

Northwest Mountain Region, ANM-7 

Federal Aviation Administration 

1601 Lind Avenue, S.W. 

Renton, W A 98057 · 

TEL: 425-227-1847 

FAJ(: 425-227-1007 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge 

Office ofHearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 

202-366-5121 Staff Assistant 

F AJ(: 202-366-7536 

FDMS No. FAA-2011-0875 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000, Washington. 

DC 2059l;Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

-2-
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
You havereached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC)Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC.Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of catalogingand locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications.  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the eventthat publications are no longer available from the original publishing agencysite. (Historical purposes)
**Title:****Executiveupdate**** 
SuDocNumber:A57.81/12-2:
ItemNumber:0120-A-26(online)
CGPSystem Number:000596868
 
2004
Spring
 
Fall
 
2005
Spring
 
Summer
 
Fall
 
Winter
 
2006
Spring
 
Summer
 
Winter
 
2007
Spring
 
Summer
 
Fall
 
Winter
 
2008
Winter
 **
H. Res. 462

In the House of Representatives, U.S., 

September 28, 2005.

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule 

XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the 

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of 

the bill (H.R. 3402) to authorize appropriations for the Department of Justice for fiscal years 2006 through 2009, and 

for other purposes. The first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. All points of order against consideration of the 

bill are waived. General debate shall be confined to the bill 

and shall not exceed one hour equally divided and controlled 

by the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on the Judiciary. After general debate the bill shall be 

considered for amendment under the five-minute rule. It shall 

be in order to consider as an original bill for the purpose of 

amendment under the five-minute rule the amendment in the 

nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on the 

Judiciary now printed in the bill. The committee amendment 

in the nature of a substitute shall be considered as read. All 
2

•HRES 462 EH 

points of order against the committee amendment in the nature of a substitute are waived. Notwithstanding clause 11 of 

rule XVIII, no amendment to the committee amendment in 

the nature of a substitute shall be in order except those printed in the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying 

this resolution. Each such amendment may be offered only in 

the order printed in the report, may be offered only by a 

Member designated in the report, shall be considered as read, 

shall be debatable for the time specified in the report equally 

divided and controlled by the proponent and an opponent, 

shall not be subject to amendment, and shall not be subject 

to a demand for division of the question in the House or in 

the Committee of the Whole. All points of order against such 

amendments are waived. At the conclusion of consideration of 

the bill for amendment the Committee shall rise and report 

the bill to the House with such amendments as may have 

been adopted. Any Member may demand a separate vote in 

the House on any amendment adopted in the Committee of 

the Whole to the bill or to the committee amendment in the 

nature of a substitute. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to final 
3

•HRES 462 EH 

passage without intervening motion except one motion to recommit with or without instructions.

Attest:

Clerk.
§ 603.1005 General responsibilities. The contracting officer is responsible for ensuring that the award document is complete and accurate. The document should: ( a ) Address all issues;
( b ) State requirements directly. It is not helpful to readers to incorporate statutes or rules by reference, without sufficient explanation of the requirements. The contracting officer generally should not incorporate clauses from the Federal Acquisition Regulation (48 CFR parts 1-53) or Department of Energy Acquisition Regulation (48 CFR parts 901-970) because those provisions are designed for procurement contracts that are used to acquire goods and services, rather than for a TIA or other assistance instruments.
( c ) Be written in clear and concise language, to minimize potential ambiguity.
###### Editorial Note on Part 51

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 51 appear at 80 FR 74980, Dec. 1, 2015.

#### § 51.86 Distribution of draft environmental impact statement.

Copies of the draft environmental impact statement and any supplement to the draft environmental impact statement will be distributed in accordance with the provisions of § 51.74.
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Robert M. Simels, on Behalf of Juan J. Sapeg, Petitioner, v Anthony Amicucci, Respondent.

[813 NYS2d 915]

Writ of habeas corpus in the nature of an application for bail reduction upon Westchester County Superior Court information Nos. 955S-2005 and 956S-2005.

Adjudged that the writ is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The determination of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, was not an improvident exercise of discretion, and did not violate “constitutional or statutory standards” *(People ex rel. Klein v Krueger,*25 NY2d 497, 499 [1969]; *see People ex rel. Rosenthal v Wolfson,*48 NY2d 230 [1979]). Schmidt, J.P., Santucci, Luciano and Rivera, JJ., concur.
PGI 207.302 Policy.       See the memorandum from Assistant Secretary of Defense (Manpower and Reserve Affairs) dated April 21, 2016, entitled “Update on OMB Circular A-76 Public-Private Competition Prohibitions-FY 2016,” regarding the ongoing Governmentwide moratorium and restrictions on public-private competitions. The restrictions prohibit the conversion of any work currently performed (or designated for performance) by civilian personnel to contract performance.    **Parent topic:** PGI 207.3 -CONTRACTOR VERSUS GOVERNMENT PERFORMANCE
§ 580.03 Curtailment priorities. ( a ) Notwithstanding any provision of law other than section 401(b) of the Natural Gas Policy Act of 1978, or any other rule, regulation, or order of the Department of Energy, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission or their predecessor agencies, and to the maximum extent practicable, no curtailment plan of an interstate pipeline may provide for curtailment of deliveries of natural gas for any essential agricultural use, unless: ( 1 ) Such curtailment does not reduce the quantity of natural gas delivered for such use below the use requirement certified by the Secretary of Agriculture under section 401(c) of the Natural Gas Policy Act of 1978 in order to meet the requirements of full food and fiber production; or
( 2 ) Such curtailment is necessary in order to meet the requirements of high-priority users; or
( 3 ) The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, in consultation with the Secretary of Agriculture, determines, by rule or order issued pursuant to section 401(b) of the Natural Gas Policy Act of 1978, that use of a fuel (other than natural gas) is economically practicable and that the fuel is reasonably available as an alternative for such essential agricultural use.
( b ) Any essential agricultural user who also qualifies as a high-priority user shall be a high-priority user for purposes of paragraph (a) of this section.
( c ) The specific relative order of priority for all uses and users of natural gas, including high-priority and essential agricultural uses and users, shall remain as reflected in effective curtailment plans of interstate pipelines filed with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to the extent that the relative order of priorities does not conflict with paragraph (a) of this section.
( d ) Nothing in this rule shall prohibit the injection of natural gas into storage by interstate pipelines or deliveries to its customers for their injection into storage unless it is demonstrated to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission that these injections or deliveries are not reasonably necessary to meet the requirements of high-priority users or essential agricultural uses.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to Results(BOREAS) BOREAS TE-7 Sap Flow DataThe BOREAS TE-7 team collected data sets in support of its efforts to characterize and interpret information on the sap flow of boreal vegetation. The heat pulse method was used to monitor sap flow and to estimate rates of transpiration from aspen, black spruce, and mixed wood forests at the SSAOA, MIX, SSA-OBS. and Batoche sites in Saskatchewan, Canada. Measurements were made at the various sites from May to October 1994, May to October 1995, and April to October 1996. A scaling procedure was used to estimate canopy transpiration rates from the sap flow measurements. The data were stored in tabular ASCII files. Analyses to date show a tendency for sap flow in aspen to remain remarkably constant over a wide range of environmental conditions VPD from 1.0 to 4.8 kPa and solar radiation less than 400 W/sq m). For forests with high aerodynamic conductance, the results would indicate an inverse relationship between stomatal conductance and VPD, for VPD greater than 1 kPa. A possible interpretation is that stomata are operating to maintain leaf water potentials above a critical minimum value, which in turn places a maximum value on the rate of sap flow that can be sustained by the tree. The data files are available on a CD-ROM (see document number 20010000884), or from the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) Distrobuted Activity Archive Center (DAAC).Document ID20010005735Acquisition SourceGoddard Space Flight CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsHall, Forrest G.*(NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt, MD United States)*Papagno, Andrea*(Raytheon Information Technology and Scientific Services Greenbelt, MD United States)*Hogg, E. H.*(Canadian Forestry Service Edmonton, Alberta Canada)*Hurdle, P. A.*(Canadian Forestry Service Edmonton, Alberta Canada)*Date AcquiredSeptember 7, 2013Publication DateOctober 1, 2000Subject CategoryEarth Resources And Remote SensingReport/Patent NumberRept-2000-03136-0/VOL150NASA/TM-2000-209891/VOL150NAS 1.15:209891/VOL150Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 462-33-01Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20010005735.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024