alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
AM #3 TO AMENDED & RESTATED DECLARATION OF TRUST & TRUST AGMT OF CO-REGISTRANT



 Exhibit 4.2.3 
 AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO THE 
 AMENDED AND RESTATED 

 DECLARATION OF TRUST AND TRUST AGREEMENT 
 OF 
 DB MULTI-SECTOR COMMODITY MASTER TRUST 
 This Amendment No. 3 (“Amendment No. 3”) to the Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust and Trust Agreement
dated as of November 21, 2006 (the “Declaration of Trust”) of DB Multi-Sector Commodity Master Trust (the “Master Trust”) by and among DB Commodity Services LLC (the “Managing Owner”),
Wilmington Trust Company and PowerShares DB Multi-Sector Commodity Trust. 
 WHEREAS, the Managing Owner has obtained the
written approval of each series of PowerShares DB Multi-Sector Commodity Trust to amend the Declaration of Trust to memorialize changes to certain fee provisions disclosed in the Declaration of Trust; and 
 WHEREAS, the Managing Owner wishes to amend the Declaration of Trust pursuant to Section 11.1(a) thereof to give effect to the
foregoing. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and of other good and valuable consideration, the receipt
and sufficiency of all of which are hereby acknowledged, the Declaration of Trust is amended as follows: 
  

	 	1.	Effective as of January 4, 2010, Section 4.9 shall be amended and replaced in its entirety as follows: 

 “SECTION 4.9. Compensation to the Managing Owner. The Managing Owner shall be entitled to compensation for its services as
managing owner of the Master Trust as set forth in the Prospectus.” 
  

	 	2.	This Amendment No. 3 to the Declaration of Trust shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of the State of Delaware.


  

	 	3.	Terms used but not otherwise defined herein shall have the meaning ascribed to such term in the Declaration of Trust, as amended. 

 Remainder of page left blank intentionally. 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment No. 3 has been executed
for and on behalf of the undersigned effective as of the 4th day of January, 2010. 
  

			
	 DB COMMODITY SERVICES LLC,
 as Managing Owner

		
	By:	 	/s/ Martin Kremenstein
		 	 Name:    Martin Kremenstein
 Title:      Chief Operating Officer

		
	By:	 	/s/ Michael Gilligan
		 	 Name:    Michael Gilligan
 Title:      Principal Financial Officer



  

			
	Acknowledged:
	 WILMINGTON TRUST COMPANY, not in its
 individual capacity but solely as Trustee
 of the Master Trust

		
	By:	 	/s/ Joseph B. Feil
		 	 Name:    Joseph B. Feil
 Title:      Vice President
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 537 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 537

 Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 3838) to establish the 
 Independent Commission to Prevent Fraud and Abuse in the Response to 
               Hurricane Katrina, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            November 7, 2005

 Mr. Waxman submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                         the Committee on Rules

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 3838) to establish the 
 Independent Commission to Prevent Fraud and Abuse in the Response to 
               Hurricane Katrina, and for other purposes.

    Resolved, That immediately upon the adoption of this resolution the 
House shall without intervention of any point of order consider in the 
House the bill (H.R. 3838) to establish the Independent Commission to 
Prevent Fraud and Abuse in the Response to Hurricane Katrina, and for 
other purposes. The bill shall be considered as read. The previous 
question shall be considered as ordered on the bill to final passage 
without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate on the bill 
equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority 
member of the Committee on Government Reform; and (2) one motion to 
recommit.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 168 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 168

   Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that Social 
 Security is a vital program facing bankruptcy, which must be reformed.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 17, 2005

  Mr. McHenry (for himself, Mr. Sam Johnson of Texas, Mr. Flake, Mr. 
Bartlett of Maryland, Mr. Feeney, Mr. Culberson, Mr. Lucas, Mr. Cole of 
 Oklahoma, Mr. Shadegg, Mr. Gingrey, Mr. Neugebauer, Mrs. Myrick, Mr. 
  Pitts, Mr. Akin, Mr. Weldon of Florida, Mr. Tancredo, Mr. Paul, Mr. 
  Pence, Mr. Miller of Florida, and Ms. Hart) submitted the following 
   resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that Social 
 Security is a vital program facing bankruptcy, which must be reformed.

Whereas the first of the baby boom generation is eligible for retirement in 
        2008;
Whereas 76 million baby boomers will retire between 2010 and 2030;
Whereas Social Security will begin running a deficit in 2018;
Whereas Social Security will become insolvent in 2042;
Whereas there were 16 workers paying into Social Security for each retiree in 
        the 1950s;
Whereas only 3.3 workers are currently paying into Social Security for each 
        retiree;
Whereas, according to Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan, the current pay-
        as-you-go system ``is ill-suited to address the unprecedented shift of 
        population from the workforce to retirement that will start in 2008'';
Whereas, according to the Social Security Trustees 2004 report, the unfunded 
        liability of Social Security is $10.4 trillion;
Whereas without reform, according to the Social Security Administration, 
        maintaining the current system would require a $600 billion annual tax 
        increase; and
Whereas without a $600 billion annual tax increase, according to the Social 
        Security Administration, current law would require a 27 percent benefit 
        cut to keep Social Security solvent: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved,  That it is the sense of the House of Representatives 
that--
            (1) the Congress should implement reforms to the Social 
        Security system in 2005;
            (2) such reforms should take effect at the earliest 
        possible date;
            (3) such reforms should provide long term solvency, while 
        guaranteeing full, unchanged benefits to citizens 55 years or 
        older; and
            (4) such reforms should avoid increasing taxes or tax 
        rates.
                                 <all>
```
809.507-1 Solicitation provisions.

(a) While conflicts of interest may not presently exist, award of certain types of contracts may create

potential future organizational conflicts of interest (see FAR 9.508 for examples). If a solicitation

may create a potential future organizational conflict of interest, the contracting officer shall insert a

provision in the solicitation imposing an appropriate restraint on the contractor's eligibility for

award of contracts in the future. Under FAR 9.507-1, the restraint must be appropriate to the nature

of the conflict and may exclude the contractor from award of one or more contracts in the future.

(b) The provision at 852.209-70, Organizational Conflicts of Interest, must be included in any

solicitation for the services addressed in FAR 9.502.

Parent topic: Subpart 809.5 - Organizational and Consultant Conflicts of Interest
Exhibit 10.25



 Exhibit 10.25 
 Summary of Compensation of Named Executive Officers 
  

				
	 Name
	  	Base Salary
	 Thomas E. Gottwald
 President and Chief Executive Officer
	  	$	725,000
		
	 C. S. Warren Huang
 President of Afton Chemical Corporation
	  	$	600,000
		
	 Steven M. Edmonds
 Vice President and General Counsel
	  	$	298,100
		
	 David A. Fiorenza
 Vice President, Treasurer and Principal Financial Officer
	  	$	297,800
		
	 Bruce R. Hazelgrove, III
 Vice President, Corporate Resources
	  	$	295,000
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The following schedule contains summarized financial information extracted
from the Questasr Pipeline Consolidated Statements of Income and Balance Sheet
for the period ended March 31, 2000, and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such unaudited financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          1,1363
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,600
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      2,538
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                16,051
<PP&E>                                         708,002
<DEPRECIATION>                                 231,699
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 523,678
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           25,525
<BONDS>                                        245,006
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         6,551
<OTHER-SE>                                     192,509
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   523,678
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                29,858
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    9,965
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,858
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,699
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 11,436
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,312
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              7,124
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,124
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 26
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 26 appear at 87 FR 71455, Nov. 22, 2022.

§ 26.403 Written policy and procedures. ( a ) Licensees and other entities who implement an FFD program under this subpart shall ensure that a clear, concise, written FFD policy statement is provided to individuals who are subject to the program. The policy statement must be written in sufficient detail to provide affected individuals with information on what is expected of them and what consequences may result from a lack of adherence to the policy.
( b ) Licensees and other entities shall develop, implement, and maintain written procedures that address the following topics: ( 1 ) The methods and techniques to be used in testing for drugs and alcohol, including procedures for protecting the privacy of an individual who provides a specimen, procedures for protecting the integrity of the specimen, and procedures used to ensure that the test results are valid and attributable to the correct individual;
( 2 ) The immediate and followup actions that will be taken, and the procedures to be used, in those cases in which individuals who are subject to the FFD program are determined to have— ( i ) Been involved in the use, sale, or possession of illegal drugs;
( ii ) Consumed alcohol to excess before or while constructing or directing the construction of safety- or security-related SSCs, as determined by a test that accurately measures BAC;
( iii ) Attempted to subvert the testing process by adulterating or diluting specimens (in vivo or in vitro), substituting specimens, or by any other means;
( iv ) Refused to provide a specimen for analysis; or
( v ) Had legal action taken relating to drug or alcohol use.
( 3 ) The process to be followed if an individual's behavior or condition raises a concern regarding the possible use, sale, or possession of illegal drugs on or off site; the possible use or possession of alcohol while constructing or directing the construction of safety- or security-related SSCs; or impairment from any cause which in any way could adversely affect the individual's ability to safely and competently perform his or her duties.
[73 FR 17176, Mar. 31, 2008, as amended at 75 FR 73941, Nov. 30, 2010]
<PAGE>   1
PART II, ITEM 6, EXHIBIT 11.


                               EGAN SYSTEMS, INC.
                       COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                         Six Months Ended
                                                                                              June 30,
                                                                                              --------
                                                                                    1997                       1996
                                                                                    ----                       ----
<S>                                                                           <C>                        <C>
Net income (loss) applicable to common stock                                  $       33,089             $       (9,074)
                                                                              ==============             ============== 
                                                                       
                                                                       
Outstanding shares - common stock at January 1,                                   10,185,000                 10,185,000
                                                                       
                                                                       
Dilutive effect of stock options and warrants                                      8,691,500                     -
                                                                       
                                                                       
Weighted average shares issued during period                                         999,000                     -     
                                                                              --------------             --------------
                                                                       
                                                                       
Weighted average common shares outstanding -                           
 primary and fully diluted - June 30,                                             19,875,500                 10,185,000
                                                                              ==============             ==============
                                                                       
                                                                       
Net income (loss) per common share -                                   
 primary and fully diluted - June 30,                                         $         0.00             $         0.00
                                                                              ==============             ==============
</TABLE>





                                       10
226 So.2d 519

#### STATE of Louisiana v. Eugene J. REDD.

No. 50111.

Sept. 29, 1969.

The application is denied. In view of the response made by the district judge, the showing made in the instant case does not warrant the exercise of our supervisory jurisdiction.

SUMMERS, J., is of the opinion the writ should be granted. See State v. Paternostro, 224 La. 87, 68 So.2d 767 (1963).
§ 503.38 Permanent exemption for certain fuel mixtures containing natural gas or petroleum. ( a ) *Eligibility.* Section 212(d) of the Act provides for a permanent exemption for certain fuel mixtures. To qualify a petitioner must certify that: ( 1 ) The petitioner proposes to use a mixture of natural gas or petroleum and an alternate fuel as a primary energy source;
( 2 ) The amount of petroleum or natural gas proposed to be used in the mixture will not exceed the minimum percentage of the total annual Btu heat input of the primary energy sources needed to maintain operational reliability of the unit consistent with maintaining a reasonable level of fuel efficiency; and
( 3 ) No alternate power supply exists, as required under § 503.8 of these regulations.
( b ) *Evidence required in support of a petition.* The petition must include the following evidence in order to make the demonstration required by this section: ( 1 ) Duly executed certifications required under paragraph (a) of this section;
( 2 ) Exhibits containing the basis for the certifications required under paragraph (a) of this section (including those factual and analytical materials deemed by the petitioner to be sufficient to support the granting of this exemption);
( 3 ) A description of the fuel mixture, including component fuels and the percentage of each such fuel to be used; and
( 4 ) Environmental impact analysis as required under § 503.13 of these regulations.
( c ) *Solar mixtures.* OFE will grant a permanent mixtures exemption for the use of a mixture of solar energy (including wind, tide, and other intermittent sources) and petroleum or natural gas, where: ( 1 ) Solar energy will account for at least 20 percent of the total annual Btu heat input, of the primary energy sources of the unit; and
( 2 ) Petitioner meets the eligibility and evidentiary requirements of paragraphs (a) and (c) of this section.
[46 FR 59903, Dec. 7, 1981, as amended at 54 FR 52896, Dec. 22, 1989]
Editorial Note on Part 1
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear at 78 FR 34247, June 7, 2013.

§ 1.23 Office of the General Counsel. The Office of the General Counsel, established pursuant to section 25 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended— ( a ) Directs matters of law and legal policy, providing opinions, advice, and assistance to the agency with respect to all of its activities;
( b ) Reviews and prepares appropriate draft Commission decisions on public petitions seeking direct Commission action and rulemaking proceedings involving hearings, monitors cases pending before presiding officers and reviews draft Commission decisions on Atomic Safety and Licensing Board decisions and rulings;
( c ) Provides interpretation of laws, regulations, and other sources of authority;
( d ) Reviews the legal form and content of proposed official actions;
( e ) As requested, provides the agency with legal advice and opinions on acquisition matters, including agency procurement contracts; placement of work at Department of Energy national laboratories; interagency agreements to acquire supplies and services; and grants and cooperative agreements. Prepares or concurs in all other interagency agreements, delegations of authority, regulations; orders; licenses; and other legal documents and prepares legal interpretations thereof;
( f ) Reviews and directs intellectual property (patent) work;
( g ) Represents and protects the interests of the NRC in legal matters and in court proceedings, and in relation to other government agencies, administrative bodies, committees of Congress, foreign governments, and members of the public; and
( h ) Represents the NRC staff as a party in NRC administrative hearings.
[52 FR 31602, Aug. 21, 1987, as amended at 56 FR 29407, June 27, 1991; 65 FR 59272, Oct. 4, 2000]
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR

THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

FARMERS TELECOMMUNICATIONS )

COOPERATIVE, INC., )

 )

Plaintiff, )

 )

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:06CV790-WC

 )

VERIZON BUSINESS NETWORK )

SERVICES INC., et al., )

 )

Defendants. )

ORDER ON MOTION

Upon consideration of Defendant Qwest Communications Corporation’s Motion to

Remove (Doc. #59) Counsel Jana Eisinger, filed on October 12, 2007, it is 

ORDERED that the motion (Doc. #59) is GRANTED. Qwest Communications

Corporation will continue to be represented by attorneys Robin G. Laurie and Joe Seawell

Moore of the law office of Balch & Bingham LLP.

DONE this 15th day of October, 2007.

/s/ Wallace Capel, Jr.

WALLACE CAPEL, JR.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00790-WC Document 60 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 1 of 2
2

Case 2:06-cv-00790-WC Document 60 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 2 of 2
Editorial Note on Part 61
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 61 appear at 80 FR 74980, Dec. 1, 2015, and at 81 FR 86909, Dec. 2, 2016.

§ 61.30 Transfer of license. ( a ) Following closure and the period of post-closure observation and maintenance, the licensee may apply for an amendment to transfer the license to the disposal site owner. The license shall be transferred when the Commission finds: ( 1 ) That the closure of the disposal site has been made in conformance with the licensee's disposal site closure plan, as amended and approved as part of the license;
( 2 ) That reasonable assurance has been provided by the licensee that the performance objectives of subpart C of this part are met;
( 3 ) That any funds for care and records required by § 61.80 (e) and (f) have been transferred to the disposal site owner;
( 4 ) That the post-closure monitoring program is operational for implementation by the disposal site owner; and
( 5 ) That the Federal or State government agency which will assume responsibility for institutional control of the disposal site is prepared to assume responsibility and ensure that the institutional requirements found necessary under § 61.23(g) will be met.
[47 FR 57463, Dec. 27, 1982, as amended at 61 FR 24674, May 16, 1996]
IV 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 221 

Honoring the life of John Hainkel. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 19, 2005 

Mr. JINDAL (for himself, Mr. BOUSTANY, Mr. MELANCON, Mr. ALEXANDER, 

Mr. BAKER, and Mr. MCCRERY) submitted the following resolution; 

which was referred to the Committee on Government Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Honoring the life of John Hainkel. 

Whereas John Hainkel, a friend to the State of Louisiana, 

passed away April 15, 2005; 

Whereas John Hainkel was a dedicated public servant, leader, and favorite Louisiana son; 

Whereas John Hainkel uniquely served as both Speaker of 

the House and President of the Senate in Louisiana; 

Whereas John Hainkel championed the cause of public and 

private education, protected the State’s natural resources, 

and developed Louisiana’s economy; and 

Whereas John Hainkel was respected by his colleagues as a 

gentleman: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 
2 

•HRES 221 IH 

1 (1) honors John Hainkel for his service to the 

2 State of Louisiana; and 

3 (2) expresses its deepest condolences to his 

4 family and friends. 

Æ
### TEXA S COU RT O F AP PEAL S, THIR D DISTRIC T, AT AU STIN NO. 03-01-00615-CR
Geor ge Andr e Cla rk

, Appell ant v. The State of Texas , Appellee FROM THE DISTRICT CO URT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 403RD JUDICI AL DISTRICT NO. 9014039, HONORABLE FRANK W. BRYAN, JR., JUDGE PRESIDING Appell ant’s motion to dism is s thi s appeal

is gran ted. See Tex . R. A

pp. P. 42 .2(a). The appeal

is dis mi ssed.

Davi d Puryear, Justi ce Bef ore Chi ef J

ustice A boussi e, Justices

B. A. Sm ith an d Puryear Di sm i ss ed on A ppe l l an t’s Moti on File d: Novem

ber 29, 2001 Do No t Publis

h