alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 32.2CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

       In connection with the quarterlyreport of CNB Corporation on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2008 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, L.Ford Sanders, II, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of CNBCorporation, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002that:
| 1.     | The  above-listed Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)  or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                 |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                         |
| 2.     | The  information contained in the above-listed Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all  material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the  Company. |
| Date:  May  9, 2008 | /s/L.  Ford Sanders, II             L. Ford  Sanders, II  Executive Vice President,   Treasurer, and  Chief Financial Officer |
|-------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                               |                                                                                                                                                                                                |
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

NORTHERN DIVISION 

CHRISTOPHER ALLEN 

PRIDMORE 

 Plaintiffs, 

v. 

GWENDOLYN MOSLEY, ET AL. 

 Defendants. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

 

 CASE NO.: 2:06-CV-778-MEF 

 

ANSWER OF DEFENDANTS MOSLEY AND ALLEN

 COME NOW Defendants Gwendolyn Mosley and Richard Allen, by and through the 

undersigned counsel, and for their Answer to the above-styled action, state as follows: 

 Defendants deny each and every material allegation made in the Complaint, and demand 

strict proof thereof. 

 Defendants deny that they violated any of the Plaintiff’s constitutional rights. 

 Defendants deny that they violated the Plaintiff’s due process rights. 

 Defendants deny that they caused or allowed to continue any unconstitutional condition 

of the Plaintiff’s confinement. 

DEFENSES AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES

 Defendants are entitled to qualified immunity. 

 Defendants are entitled to sovereign immunity under Article 1, § 14 of the Alabama 

Constitution (1901). 

Case 2:06-cv-00778-MEF-WC Document 8 Filed 10/10/2006 Page 1 of 2
 Defendants are entitled to immunity under the Eleventh Amendment to the United States 

Constitution. 

 Respectfully submitted, 

 TROY KING (KIN047) 

 Attorney General 

 /s/ Benjamin H. Albritton

 Benjamin H. Albritton (ALB003) 

 Assistant Attorney General 

 

ADDRESS OF COUNSEL: 

Office of the Attorney General 

11 South Union Street 

Montgomery, AL 36130 

(334) 242-7300 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that I have, this the 10th day of October, 2006, served a copy of the 

foregoing upon the Plaintiff by placing same in the United States Mail, postage prepaid and 

properly addressed as follows: 

Christopher Pridmore, #1398558 

Easterling Correctional Facility 

200 Wallace Drive 

Clio, AL 36017 

 /s/ Benjamin H. Albritton

 Benjamin H. Albritton 

Assistant Attorney General 

 

Case 2:06-cv-00778-MEF-WC Document 8 Filed 10/10/2006 Page 2 of 2
Subpart 2027.3 - Patent Rights Under Government Contracts    **Parent topic:** PART 2027 - PATENTS, DATA, AND COPYRIGHTS2027.305-3 Follow-up by Government.       (a) The contracting officer shall, as a part of the closeout of a contract, require each contractor to report any patents, copyrights, or royalties attained using any portion of the contract funds in writing.          (b) If no activity is to be reported, the contractor shall provide the following written determination before final payment and closeout of the contract:          (1) No inventions or discoveries were made,          (2) No copyrights were secured, produced, or composed,          (3) No notices or claims of patent or copyright infringement have been received by the contractor or its subcontractors; and          (4) No royalty payments were directly involved in the contract or reflected in the contract price to the Government, nor were any royalties or other payments paid or owed directly to others.          (c) The contracting officer may waive any of the requirements in paragraphs (b)          (1)  			through (4) of this section, after documenting the file to indicate the -          (1) Impracticality of obtaining the document(s); and          (2) Steps taken to attempt to obtain them.          (d) The contracting officer shall notify agency legal counsel responsible for patents whenever a contractor reports any patent, copyright, or royalty activity. The contract officer shall document the official file with the resolution to protect the Government's rights before making any final payment and closing out the contract.2027.305-70 Solicitation provisions and contract clauses.       The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 2052.227-70, Drawings, Designs, Specifications, and Data, in all solicitations and contracts in which drawings, designs, specifications, or other data will be developed and the NRC is required to retain full rights to them (except for the contractor's right to retain a copy for its own use). When any of the clauses prescribed at FAR 27.409, Solicitation Provisions and Contract Clauses, are included in the solicitation/contract, this clause will not be used.
#### GROPP v. GREAT ATLANTIC & PACIFIC TEA CO.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

June 5, 1914.)

Action by Henry E. Gropp against the Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company.

No opinion. Motion denied, with $10 costs. Order filed. See, also, 161 App. Div. 859, 146 N. Y. Supp. 1092, 147 N. Y. Supp. 182.
MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-11-00431-CR

IN RE Jesse RAMIREZ

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Rebecca Simmons, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Delivered and Filed: July 13, 2011

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

On June 22, 2011, relator Jesse Ramirez filed a petition for writ of mandamus, 

complaining of the trial court’s failure to rule on various pro se motions. However, counsel has 

been appointed to represent relator in the criminal proceeding pending in the trial court for which 

he is currently confined. A criminal defendant is not entitled to hybrid representation. See 

Robinson v. State, 240 S.W.3d 919, 922 (Tex. Crim. App. 2007); Patrick v. State, 906 S.W.2d 

481, 498 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995). A trial court has no legal duty to rule on pro se motions or 

petitions filed with regard to a criminal proceeding in which the defendant is represented by 

counsel. See Robinson, 240 S.W.3d at 922. Consequently, the trial court did not abuse its 

 1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2010-CR-8528-A, styled State of Texas v. Jesse Ramirez, pending in the 

144th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Angus K. McGinty presiding.
04-11-00431-CR

- 2 -

discretion by declining to rule on relator’s pro se motions filed in the criminal proceeding 

pending in the trial court. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. TEX. R.

APP. P. 52.8(a).

PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH
ATLANTIC. OCEAN

BATHYMETRIC MAP . . TIBBET

=. INIT SIR HO INP 40 2903 HOUISOa

179000m.E,

961

690000m.E,

1005

‘5pm N.

3640000m.N,

= NIV SIM HO ANd 40 3903 NOLLISOd

= NN SIKL NO ANI 40 3903 NOUISOd

3550000.

'3550000m.N

964.)
TEUOOURE,

go00oa

Bathymetry compiled by the National Ocean Service (NOS) from Bathymetric Data other than EVALUATION OF BATHYMETRIC DATA OUTER CONTINENTAL SHELF RESOURCE MANAGEMENT MAP al BATHYMETRIC DATA INDEX 72%54 ; Tl BBET

NOS hydrographic surveys. This is a facsimile reproduction of the bathymetric manuscript and

= NIT SIHL HO slug 40 3903 NOLISOE

il it its final lished fe . This inf tion i t intended fi ¢
ee nnonat pane its final published form is information is not intended for UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE NOS NI 18-1 2 (OCS) :
. : 5
Bathymetric Contour Interval: 50 meters to maximum depth. Betymet compiled by the National Ocean Serie tam NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION
Universal Transverse Mercator Grid, Zone 18; 10,000 meter ticks (--) are shown inside the Tho Gathyrnstric Data ranges in sesle iam 1 $60,000 io” NATIONAL OCEAN SERVICE
neatline. line spacing of 12.0 nautical ries. Te VO 2nd 8 maximum I
Protraction Diagram data shown in subdued (screened) black wos compiled by the Minerals Bocording Matthews Tobles, £939. 1984 i

Management Service {MMS}. Bathymetric data from sources other than

i OS irc i ve
THIS MAP IS NOT A LEGAL DOCUMENT for Federal leasing purposes; for such purposes Produced at Washington, D.C. NOS hydrographic suneys gaZer_'NOEX TO ADJOINING SHEETS oe i
use the MMS Outer Continental Shelf Official Protraction Diagrams. for ” | |
m
- Heavy fine(s) indicate limits of these: protraction_diagrams - : : : ; : wan vanes, ;
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR i
MINERALS MANAGEMENT SERVICE wea wi iee2 |
‘ TAYLOR
aoe 32° wen |
TRANSVERSE MERCATOR PROJECTION a 7 al aie |
76 70"
; Scale 1:250,000
5 oO 5 10 15 20 Statute Miles i}
5 oO 5 10 15 20 25 30 Kilometers | /

5 o . 5 10 15 Nautical Miles
?
PGI 236.213 Special procedures for sealed

bidding in construction contracting.

For additive or deductive items—

(1) Use a bid schedule with—

(i) A first or base bid item covering the work generally as specified; and

(ii) A list of priorities that contains one or more additive or deductive bid items that progressively

add or omit specified features of the work in a stated order of priority. (Normally, do not mix

additive and deductive bid items in the same solicitation.)

(2) Before opening the bids, record in the contract file the amount of funds available for the project.

(3) Determine the low bidder and the items to be awarded in accordance with the procedures in the

clause at 252.236-7007, Additive or Deductive Items.

Parent topic: PGI 236.2 -SPECIAL ASPECTS OF CONTRACTING FOR CONSTRUCTION
**Exhibit 32.2**

**Certification of Chief financial Officer Under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

The undersigned officer of The First Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company") hereby certifies that the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009 to which this certification is being furnished as an exhibit (the "Report"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. This certification is provided pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K ("Item 601(b)(32)") promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"), and the Exchange Act. In accordance with clause (ii) of Item 601(b)(32), thiscertification (A) shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and (B) shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.

 

Date: May 7, 2009

 

/s/ F. Stephen Ward

F. Stephen Ward

Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer

The First Bancorp, Inc.

 

 

Page 1
EXHIBIT 32.2

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Terry R. Lazar, Chief Financial Officer of Water Chef, Inc., hereby certify
that the Form 10-Q of Water Chef, Inc. for the fiscal quarter ended March 31,
2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in such report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of Water Chef, Inc.

      Date:  May 15, 2008
                                       ----------------------------------------
                                       Terry R. Lazar
                                       Chief Financial Officer


This certification is being furnished pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act, shall not be deemed to be filed as part of the periodic
report described herein nor shall it be deemed filed by Water Chef, Inc. for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
#### § 985.65 Rights of the Secretary.

Members of the Committee and subcommittees, and any agents, employees or representatives thereof, shall be subject to removal or suspension by the Secretary at any time. Each and every decision, determination, and other act of the Committee shall be subject to the continuing right of disapproval by the Secretary at any time. Upon such disapproval, the disapproved action of the Committee shall be deemed null and void, except as to acts done in reliance thereon or in accordance therewith prior to such disapproval by the Secretary.
# 4.2203 Contract clause.

The *contracting officer**shall* insert the clause at 52.204-27, Prohibition on a ByteDance *Covered Application*, in all *solicitations* and contracts, unless an exception is granted in accordance with OMB Memorandum M-23-13.

**Parent topic:**Subpart 4.22 Prohibition on a ByteDance Covered Application.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) Case No.: 3:06cr204-MEF

)

HENRY ERIK YAPIAS )

NOTICE OF INTENT TO CHANGE PLEA

COMES NOW the Defendant, HenryErik Yapias, by and through his undersigned counsel,

Jennifer A. Hart, and notifies the Court of his intent to change his previously entered plea of not

guilty to guilty. The Defendant waives his right to plea in front of a district judge and consents to

do so before a magistrate judge.

Dated this 15 day of October 2006. th

Respectfully submitted, 

s/Jennifer A. Hart

JENNIFER A. HART

FEDERAL DEFENDERS

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

201 Monroe Street, Suite 407

Montgomery, AL 36104

Phone: (334) 834-2099

Fax: (334) 834-0353

jennifer_hart@fd.org

AL Bar Code: HAR189

Case 3:06-cr-00204-MEF-CSC Document 16 Filed 11/15/2006 Page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on November 15, 2006, I electronically filed the foregoing with the

Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing to the

following: 

Chris Snyder, Assistant United States Attorney.

Respectfully submitted,

s/Jennifer A. Hart

JENNIFER A. HART

FEDERAL DEFENDERS

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

201 Monroe Street, Suite 407

Montgomery, AL 36104

Phone: (334) 834-2099

Fax: (334) 834-0353

jennifer_hart@fd.org

AL Bar Code: HAR189

Case 3:06-cr-00204-MEF-CSC Document 16 Filed 11/15/2006 Page 2 of 2
# EPA Letter from Ormat

Hello, I have attached a scan regarding Ormat’s comments o n White Papers on Methane and VOC Emissions in the Oil and Natural Gas Sector: Oil and Natural Gas Sector Compressors. We will overnight the hard copy today. Please let me know if you have any questions. Best regards, 

### Shelly Hardy Administrative Assistant 1 Main: (775) 356­9029 Ext. 32322 6225 Neil Road Reno, NV 89511 shardy@ORMAT.COM  Please consider the environment - do you really need to print this email? *************************************************** ************************************** Confidentiality Warning: The information contained in this e­mail is confide ntial and subject to certain laws pertaining to theprotection of proprietary information. It is inten ded only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the int ended recipient, or the authorized agent thereof, t he reader is hereby notified that retention or any dis semination, distribution or copying of this transmi ssion is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please notify us immediately by repl y e­mail or by telephone, and delete all copies of the original message. *************************************************** ************************************** 

## Hardy <shardy@ORMAT.COM> Shelly Mon 6/16/2014 4:07 PM To: OilandGas.Whitepapers <OilandGas.Whitepapers@epa.go v>; Cc: Bob Sullivan <bsullivan@ormat.com>; Colin Duncan <c duncan@ormat.com>; JWise@cassidy.com <JWise@cassidy .com>; 

###  1 attachment 20140616124430975.pdf; 

### Page **1 of**  **1 EPA Letter from Ormat** 
**- OilandGas.Whitepapers** 

**8/ 27/** **2014 https://pod51045.outlook.com/owa/OilandGas.Whitepapers@epa.gov/**
1330.202-2 Impracticality of submission.       The DOC Head of Agency for Procurement is authorized to determine that it is impractical to secure a Disclosure Statement, although submission is required, and to authorize contract award without obtaining the Statement.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 1330.2 - CAS Program Requirements
#### § 460.104 Building thermal envelope air leakage.

Manufactured homes must be sealed against air leakage at all joints, seams, and penetrations associated with the building thermal envelope in accordance with the component manufacturer's installation instructions and the requirements set forth in table 1 to 460.104. Sealing methods between dissimilar materials must allow for differential expansion, contraction and mechanical vibration, and must establish a continuous air barrier upon installation of all opaque components of the building thermal envelope. All gaps and penetrations in the exterior ceiling, exterior floor, and exterior walls, including ducts, flue shafts, plumbing, piping, electrical wiring, utility penetrations, bathroom and kitchen exhaust fans, recessed lighting fixtures adjacent to unconditioned space, and light tubes adjacent to unconditioned space, must be sealed with caulk, foam, gasket or other suitable material. The air barrier installation criteria are adapted from section R402 of the 2021 IECC.

| Component | Air barrier criteria |
| --- | --- |
| Ceiling or attic | The air barrier in any dropped ceiling or dropped soffit must be aligned with the insulation and any gaps in the air barrier must be sealed with caulk, foam, gasket, or other suitable material. Access hatches, panels, and doors, drop-down stairs, or knee wall doors to unconditioned attic spaces must be weather-stripped or equipped with a gasket to produce a continuous air barrier. |
| Duct system register boots | Duct system register boots that penetrate the building thermal envelope or the air barrier must be sealed to the subfloor, wall covering or ceiling penetrated by the boot, air barrier, or the interior finish materials with caulk, foam, gasket, or other suitable material. |
| Electrical box or phone box on exterior walls | The air barrier must be installed behind electrical and communication boxes or the air barrier must be sealed around the box penetration with caulk, foam, gasket, or other suitable material. |
| Floors | The air barrier must be installed at any exposed edge of insulation. The bottom board may serve as the air barrier. |
| Mating line surfaces | Mating line surfaces must be equipped with a continuous and durable gasket. |
| Recessed lighting | Recessed light fixtures installed in the building thermal envelope must be sealed to the drywall with caulk, foam, gasket, or other suitable material. |
| Rim joists | The air barrier must enclose the rim joists. The junctions of the rim board and the subfloor must be air sealed. |
| Shower or tub adjacent to exterior wall | The air barrier must separate showers and tubs from exterior walls. |
| Walls | The junction of the top plate and the exterior ceiling, and the junction of the bottom plate and the exterior floor, along exterior walls must be sealed with caulk, foam, gasket, or other suitable material. |
| Windows, skylights, and exterior doors | The rough openings around windows, exterior doors, and skylights must be sealed with caulk or foam. |

Table 1 to § 460.104—Air Barrier Installation Criteria
#### Barbara White, Respondent, v Kyung Kim, Appellant, et al., Defendant.

[814 NYS2d 876]

In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice, the defendant appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Tolbert, J.), dated November 3, 2004, which, upon a jury verdict awarding damages to the plaintiff in the sums of $90,000 for past pain and suffering and $150,000 for future pain and suffering, and upon the denial of his motion pursuant to CPLR 4404 to set aside the verdict, is in favor of the plaintiff and against him.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

For a court to conclude that a jury verdict is unsupported by the evidence, there must be “no valid line of reasoning and permissible inferences which could possibly lead rational [persons] to the conclusion reached by the jury” *(Robinson v City of New York,*300 AD2d 384 [2002], quoting *Cohen v Hallmark Cards,*45 NY2d 493, 499 [1978]). Moreover, a jury verdict will not be set aside as against the weight of the evidence unless it could not have been reached on any fair interpretation of the evidence *(see Nicastro v Park,*113 AD2d 129 [1985]). In this case, the verdict was supported by legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence.

Further, while the Supreme Court erred in determining that the letters of the plaintiffs treating physicians were admissible pursuant to CPLR 3122 (a), the error did not prejudice a substantial right *(see*CPLR 2002).

The defendant’s remaining contention is without merit. Adams, J.P., Rivera, Skelos and Lifson, JJ., concur.
**Exhibit 32.1**

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Quarterly Report of SEDONA Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending June 30, 2003 (the “Report”), I, Marco A. Emrich, President and Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge: 

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

/s/Marco A. EmrichMarco A. EmrichPresident and Chief Executive Officer

October 2, 2003

23

----