alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
i i i i i i

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-08-00647-CV

IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF JOHN ROBERT BONNER, Deceased

From the Probate Court No. 2, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2005-PC-1878

Honorable Tom Rickhoff, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice

Delivered and Filed: January 28, 2009

DISMISSED

After this court granted appellant Michelle L. Valicek two extensions of time, appellant’s

brief was due on December 1, 2008. No appellant’s brief or additional motion for extension of time

has been filed. On December 30, 2008, this court ordered appellant to show cause in writing by

January 9, 2009, why this appeal should not be dismissed for want of prosecution. Appellant did not

respond. The appeal is therefore dismissed for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(1),

42.3(b). Costs of appeal are taxed against appellant.

PER CURIAM
H. Res. 415

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

September 19, 2006.

Whereas during the establishment of the Socialist Republic of 

Vietnam as a 1-party state ruled and controlled by the 

Vietnamese Communist Party, uncompensated confiscation of real and personal property from Vietnamese citizens was a widespread occurrence; 

Whereas Article 23 of the Constitution of the Socialist Republic of Vietnam provides that ‘‘[t]he lawful property of 

individuals and organizations shall not be nationalized’’; 

Whereas according to the Department of State, more work is 

necessary to adequately protect property rights in Vietnam; and 

Whereas the people of the United States are firmly committed to freedom, democracy, and basic human rights 

for the citizens of the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: 

Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That—

(1) The House of Representatives—

(A) welcomes recent attempts by the Government of the Socialist Republic of Vietnam to establish private land use rights for its citizens, and 
2

•HRES 415 EH 

hopes that these rights are quickly expanded to encompass all Vietnamese citizens; 

(B) calls on the Government of the Socialist 

Republic of Vietnam to more fully recognize its responsibility to provide equitable, prompt, and fair 

restitution of property that was confiscated by the 

government; 

(C) calls on the Government of the Socialist 

Republic of Vietnam to direct local officials, particularly in the Central Highlands region, to 

promptly investigate and resolve complaints about 

discriminatory and uncompensated confiscation of 

land; 

(D) urges the Government of the Socialist Republic of Vietnam to form a national commission 

for processing restitution claims, and to obligate 

local government officials, bodies, and agencies to 

provide all necessary documentation and cooperation to facilitate the implementation of decisions 

issued by the national commission; and 

(E) strongly urges the Government of the Socialist Republic of Vietnam—

(i) to ensure that implementation of land 

use reforms by local officials does not result in 

increased inequity in access to land, particu-
3

•HRES 415 EH 

larly for the poor and for those out of favor 

with the Communist Party; and 

(ii) to ensure that the government provides fair, prompt, and equitable restitution to 

former landowners for the property rights of 

all confiscated lands; and 

(2) it is the sense of the House of Representatives 

that—

(A) the President should specifically consider 

land use rights for individuals in determining 

whether the Socialist Republic of Vietnam is a 

country of particular concern for religious freedom 

under section 402(b)(1)(A) of the International Religious Freedom Act of 1998 (22 U.S.C. 

6442(b)(1)(A)); and 

(B) the President should direct the Secretary 

of State to include, in the Secretary of State’s annual Country Reports on Human Rights Practices 

submitted to the Congress under the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961, the status of land use rights 
4

•HRES 415 EH 

and restitution claims in the Socialist Republic of 

Vietnam. 

Attest:

Clerk.
§ 50.111 Criminal penalties. ( a ) Section 223 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, provides for criminal sanctions for willful violation of, attempted violation of, or conspiracy to violate, any regulation issued under sections 161b, 161i, or 161o of the Act. For purposes of section 223, all the regulations in part 50 are issued under one or more of sections 161b, 161i, or 161o, except for the sections listed in paragraph (b) of this section.
( b ) The regulations in 10 CFR part 50 that are not issued under sections 161b, 161i, or 161o for the purposes of section 223 are as follows: §§ 50.1, 50.2, 50.3, 50.4, 50.8, 50.11, 50.12, 50.13, 50.20, 50.21, 50.22, 50.23, 50.30, 50.31, 50.32, 50.33, 50.34a, 50.35, 50.36b, 50.37, 50.38, 50.39, 50.40, 50.41, 50.42, 50.43, 50.45, 50.50, 50.51, 50.52, 50.53, 50.56, 50.57, 50.58, 50.81, 50.90, 50.91, 50.92, 50.100, 50.101, 50.102, 50.103, 50.109, 50.110, 50.111.
[57 FR 55075, Nov. 24, 1992, as amended at 61 FR 39303, July 29, 1996]
exv10w28





Exhibit 10.28



Amendment

To the

Standard & Poor’s Employee Retirement Plan Supplement



     Effective
as of January 1, 2010, the Standard & Poor’s Employee Retirement Plan
Supplement (the “S&P Supplement”), amended and
restated as of January 1, 2008, unless
otherwise provided, is amended as set forth below:


     1. Article 5 of the S&P Supplement is amended to incorporate new Section 5.05, as set
forth below:



Section 5.05. Distribution of
Benefits Due to FICA. If any Benefits under
this Plan are taxable to a Participant under the Federal Insurance Contributions
Act (FICA) (as a result of Section 3101, 3121(a) or 3121(v)(2) of the Code or
any successor provisions) (the “FICA Tax”) prior to the date the Benefits become
payable to the Participant in accordance With terms of this Plan, then the
Company may determine, in its sole discretion, that a lump sum
distribution shall be made from this Plan in an amount equal to: (i) the FICA Tax
payable on any such Benefits; (ii) the income tax at source on wages imposed under
Section 3401 of the Code or the corresponding withholding provisions of
applicable state, local or foreign tax laws as a result of the
payment of the FICA Tax under subsection (i) of this Section 5.05 of the plan;
plus (iii) the additional income tax at source on wages attributable
to the pyramiding Section 3401 of the Code wages and taxes, in
accordance with
Section 409A of the Code (the amounts under subsections (i), (ii) and (iii)
collectively, the “Accelerated Tax Payment”). The total
amount of any accelerated distributions for a Participant must not
exceed the aggregate of the FICA amount and the income tax withholding related to
such FICA amount.
In the event that the Accelerated Tax Payment is distributed, the Participant’s
Benefit shall be reduced by such Accelerated Tax Payment.


* * * * *



     Except as set forth herein, the S&P Supplement remains in full force and effect
Subpart 342.7 - Indirect Cost Rates

Parent topic: PART 342 - CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION

342.705 Final indirect cost rates.

Contract actions for which the Department of Health and Human Services is the cognizant Federal

agency:

(a) The Financial Management Services, Division of Cost Allocation, Program Support Center, shall

establish facilities and administration costs, also known as indirect cost rates, research patient care

rates, and, as necessary, fringe benefits, computer, and other special costing rates for use in

contracts awarded to State and local governments, colleges and universities, hospitals, and other

nonprofit organizations.

(b) The National Institute of Health, Division of Financial Advisory Services, shall establish indirect

cost rates and similar rates for use in contracts awarded to for profit organizations.
Editorial Note on Part 10
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 10 appear at 70 FR 30897, May 31, 2005; 77 FR 39904, July 6, 2012; 81 FR 86909, Dec. 2, 2016.

§ 10.33 Action by the Deputy Executive Director for Materials, Waste, Research, State, Tribal, Compliance, Administration, and Human Capital Programs. ( a ) The Deputy Executive Director for Materials, Waste, Research, State, Tribal, Compliance, Administration, and Human Capital Programs, on the basis of the record accompanied by all findings and recommendations, shall make a final determination whether access authorization and/or employment clearance shall be granted, denied, or revoked, except when the provisions of § 10.28 (i), (j), or (l) have been used and the Deputy Executive Director for Materials, Waste, Research, State, Tribal, Compliance, Administration, and Human Capital Programs determination is adverse, the Commission shall make the final agency determination.
( b ) In making the determination as to whether an access authorization and/or an employment clearance shall be granted, denied, or revoked, the Deputy Executive Director for Materials, Waste, Research, State, Tribal, Compliance, Administration, and Human Capital Programs or the Commission shall give due recognition to the favorable as well as the unfavorable information concerning the individual and shall take into account the value of the individual's services to the NRC's program and the consequences of denying or revoking access authorization and/or employment clearance.
( c ) In the event of an adverse determination, the Deputy Executive Director for Materials, Waste, Research, State, Tribal, Compliance, Administration, and Human Capital Programs shall promptly notify the individual through the Director, Office of Administration, of his or her decision that an access authorization and/or an employment clearance is being denied or revoked and of his or her findings with respect to each allegation contained in the notification letter for transmittal to the individual.
( d ) In the event of a favorable determination, the Deputy Executive Director for Materials, Waste, Research, State, Tribal, Compliance, Administration, and Human Capital Programs shall promptly notify the individual through the Director, Office of Administration.
[64 FR 15644, Apr. 1, 1999]
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2


   CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of SEDONA Corporation on Form
10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Quarterly Report"), I, Anita M.
Primo, Chief Financial Officer of SEDONA Corporation certify, pursuant Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
SEDONA Corporation.


Dated: August 15, 2005             /s/ ANITA M. PRIMO
                                   ---------------------------------------------
                                   Anita M. Primo
                                   Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
                                   (Principal Financial Officer)















                                       21
#### Prater *v.*Prater.

July 18, 1913.

Temporary alimony; from Fulton. Motion to dismiss.

*T. B. Brown*and *G. G. Battle,*for plaintiff in error.

*T. II. Scott,*contra.

Atkinson, J.

The Supreme Court is without jurisdiction to pass upon the merits of any bill of exceptions the recitals of fact in which are not duly certified to be true. *Binyard*v. *State,*126 *Ga.*635 (55 S. E. 498) ; *Cade*v. *DuBose,*125 *Ga.*832 (54 S. E. 697) ; *Grant*v. *Derrick,*130 *Ga.*43 (60 S. E. 157).

*Writ of error dismissed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
Editorial Note on Part 2
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

§ 2.1303 Availability of documents. Unless exempt from disclosure under part 9 of this chapter, the following documents pertaining to each application for a license transfer requiring Commission approval will be placed at the NRC Web site, *http://www.nrc.gov ,* when available: ( a ) The license transfer application and any associated requests;
( b ) Commission correspondence with the applicant or licensee related to the application;
( c ) Federal Register notices;
( d ) The NRC staff Safety Evaluation Report (SER).
( e ) Any NRC staff order which acts on the license transfer application; and
( f ) If a hearing is held, the hearing record and decision.
[63 FR 66730, Dec. 3, 1998, as amended at 64 FR 48949, Sept. 9, 1999]
Editorial Note on Part 37
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 37 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

§ 37.71 Additional requirements for transfer of category 1 and category 2 quantities of radioactive material. A licensee transferring a category 1 or category 2 quantity of radioactive material to a licensee of the Commission or an Agreement State shall meet the license verification provisions listed below instead of those listed in § 30.41(d) of this chapter: ( a ) Any licensee transferring category 1 quantities of radioactive material to a licensee of the Commission or an Agreement State, prior to conducting such transfer, shall verify with the NRC's license verification system or the license issuing authority that the transferee's license authorizes the receipt of the type, form, and quantity of radioactive material to be transferred and that the licensee is authorized to receive radioactive material at the location requested for delivery. If the verification is conducted by contacting the license issuing authority, the transferor shall document the verification. For transfers within the same organization, the licensee does not need to verify the transfer.
( b ) Any licensee transferring category 2 quantities of radioactive material to a licensee of the Commission or an Agreement State, prior to conducting such transfer, shall verify with the NRC's license verification system or the license issuing authority that the transferee's license authorizes the receipt of the type, form, and quantity of radioactive material to be transferred. If the verification is conducted by contacting the license issuing authority, the transferor shall document the verification. For transfers within the same organization, the licensee does not need to verify the transfer.
( c ) In an emergency where the licensee cannot reach the license issuing authority and the license verification system is nonfunctional, the licensee may accept a written certification by the transferee that it is authorized by license to receive the type, form, and quantity of radioactive material to be transferred. The certification must include the license number, current revision number, issuing agency, expiration date, and for a category 1 shipment the authorized address. The licensee shall keep a copy of the certification. The certification must be confirmed by use of the NRC's license verification system or by contacting the license issuing authority by the end of the next business day.
( d ) The transferor shall keep a copy of the verification documentation as a record for 3 years.
#### In re KECK.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

July 1, 1914.)

In the matter of the final accounting of Jeremiah Keck, as executor of the last will and testament of Edward Ecker, deceased.

No opinion. Decree unanimously affirmed, without costs.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION

J.B., a minor child, by and )

through his next friend, )

Addie Ward, on behalf of )

himself and all others )

similarly situated, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

v. ) 2:06cv755-MHT

) 

WALTER WOOD, in his )

individual capacity, )

)

Defendant. )

J.B., a minor child, by and )

through his next friend, )

Addie Ward, on behalf of )

himself and all others )

similarly situated, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

v. ) 2:06cv908-MHT

) 

WALTER WOOD, in his )

individual capacity, )

)

Defendant. )

Case 2:06-cv-00755-MHT-CSC Document 22 Filed 03/06/2007 Page 1 of 2
ORDER

It is ORDERED that the motion for extension (doc. no.

19) is granted.

DONE, this the 6th day of March, 2007.

 /s/ Myron H. Thompson 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00755-MHT-CSC Document 22 Filed 03/06/2007 Page 2 of 2
Case 2:06-cv-00755-MHT-CSC Document 2 Filed 08/25/2006 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:06-cv-00755-MHT-CSC Document 2 Filed 08/25/2006 Page 2 of 2
#### § 5.550 Sex as a bona fide occupational qualification.

A recipient may take action otherwise prohibited by §§ 5.500 through 5.550 provided it is shown that sex is a bona fide occupational qualification for that action, such that consideration of sex with regard to such action is essential to successful operation of the employment function concerned. A recipient shall not take action pursuant to this section that is based upon alleged comparative employment characteristics or stereotyped characterizations of one or the other sex, or upon preference based on sex of the recipient, employees, students, or other persons, but nothing contained in this section shall prevent a recipient from considering an employee's sex in relation to employment in a locker room or toilet facility used only by members of one sex.
###### Editorial Note on Part 31

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 31 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

#### § 31.3 [Reserved]
EXHIBIT 23











CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS AND GEOLOGISTS





We hereby consent to the references in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022, of Gulf Coast Ultra Deep Royalty Trust (the "Royalty Trust"), including the Notes to the Financial Statements included in such Form 10-K, to all references to our firm name and to our reserves report prepared for the Royalty Trust relating to the estimated quantities of certain of the Royalty Trust's proved reserves of gas and present values thereof as of December 31, 2022.








NETHERLAND, SEWELL & ASSOCIATES, INC.By:/s/ Richard B. TalleyRichard B. Talley, Jr., P.E.Chief Executive Officer





Houston, Texas


March 15, 2023
Jonathan B. Hill

T: +1 202 776 2725

jhill@cooley.com

1299 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE, NW, SUITE 700, WASHINGTON, DC 20004-2400 T: (202) 842-7800 F: (202) 842-7899 WWW.COOLEY.COM

June 9, 2014

Department of Transportation

Docket Management System

1200 New Jersey Ave, SW

Washington, DC 20590

Re: Docket FAA-2014-0355

Dear Sir or Madam:

The name of one of the principals of Flying-Cam Inc. identified in the May 27, 2014 exemption 

filing is misspelled. Please correct your records and amend the exemption filing to reflect that 

Mr. Haik Gazarian’s name was misspelled in the third paragraph of the exemption request. 

Please indicate in all correspondence and in the record that the correct spelling of his name is 

as follows: “Haik Gazarian”.

Please direct all correspondence for Flying-Cam Inc. to Mr. Gazarian at 

h.gazarian.flying.cam@gmail.com.

Thank you for your attention to this matter.

Sincerely yours,

Jonathan B. Hill

Counsel for Flying-Cam Inc.

cc: James Williams

Robert Pappas

Dean Griffith, Esq.

Thuy Cooper

107832623 v1

06/09/14
#### § 431.32 Preemption of State regulations.

The provisions of § 431.31 supersede any State regulation to the extent required by Section 327 of the Act. Pursuant to the Act, all State regulations that require the disclosure for any electric motor of information with respect to energy consumption, other than the information required to be disclosed in accordance with this part, are superseded.
Searched for **http://bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/suibcs98.pdf**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **http://bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/suibcs98.pdf**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.
162 So.2d 12

#### Eva Bertrand PITRE et al. v. ALL STATE INSURANCE COMPANY et al.

No. 47171.

March 31, 1964.

In re: Eva Bertrand Pitre et al. applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of St. Landry. 160 So.2d 402.

Writ refused. Under the facts found by the Court of Appeal, we find no error of law in the result reached by the Court of Appeal.
Subpart 837.1 - Service Contracts - General    **Parent topic:** PART 837 - SERVICE CONTRACTING837.110-70 VA solicitation provisions and contract clauses.       (a) Contracting officers shall include the clause at 852.237-74, Non-Discrimination in Service Delivery, in all solicitations and contracts covering services provided to eligible beneficiaries.          (b) The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 852.237-75, Key Personnel, in solicitations and contracts when the contracting officer will require the contractor to designate contractor key personnel.
Subpart 1915.1 - General Requirements for

Negotiation

Parent topic: PART 1915 - CONTRACTING BY NEGOTIATION

1915.106 Contract clauses.

1915.106-70 Key personnel and facilities.

Whenever contractor selection has been substantially predicated on the contractor's possession of

special capabilities (i.e., personnel and/or facilities) the contracting officer shall include the clause at

1952.215-70 in the awarded contract.
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 05949**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  x 

### 05949\05949_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook



### 05949\05949_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist 

### 05949\05949_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted x 

### 05949\05949_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 05949\05949_PartB.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 05949\05949_PartC.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 05949\05949_PartD.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 05949\05949_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file



### 05949\Certification Statement_05949.pdf Plant certification statement 

### 05949\Supporting Documentation\05949_Final EPA Copy-Eastlake-Part A5-2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 

### 05949\Supporting Documentation\05949_Final EPA Copy-Eastlake-Part A5-3.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 

### 05949\Supporting Documentation\05949_Final EPA Copy-Eastlake-Part D3-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database

. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION

BERYL JACKSON, TRACEY )

MARTIN, LISA PITCHFORD, )

and KIMBERLY LOVE, )

)

Plaintiffs, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

v. ) 2:06cv785-MHT

) 

U.S. FOODSERVICE, INC., )

and U.S. FOODSERVICE, INC.-)

Montgomery Division, )

)

Defendants. )

ORDER

It is ORDERED that the motion to enforce settlement

and motion attorneys fees and costs (Doc. No. 77) are set

for an evidentiary hearing on April 21, 2008, at 10:00

a.m. at the Frank M. Johnson, Jr. United States

Courthouse Complex, Courtroom 2FMJ, One Church Street,

Montgomery, Alabama. 

Case 2:06-cv-00785-MHT-WC Document 78 Filed 04/03/2008 Page 1 of 2
It is further ORDERED that plaintiff Tracey Martin

is to file a response to the motion by no later than

April 14, 2008.

DONE, this the 3rd day of April, 2008.

 /s/ Myron H. Thompson 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00785-MHT-WC Document 78 Filed 04/03/2008 Page 2 of 2