alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
PGI 208.7303 Procedures.

(1) Item managers and contracting officers will use the PMIC and/or other relevant data furnished

with a purchase request to determine the applicability of this subpart.

(2) When an offeror advises of a precious metals requirement, the contracting officer shall use the

procedures in Chapter 11 of DoD 4160.21-M, Defense Materiel Disposition Manual, to determine

availability of required precious metal assets and current Government-furnished materiel (GFM) unit

prices. If the precious metals are available, the contracting officer shall evaluate offers and award

the contract on the basis of the offer that is in the best interest of the Government.

(3) When the clause prescribed by DFARS 208.7305 is included in a solicitation, the contracting

officer shall ensure that Section B, Schedule of Supplies or Services and Prices, is structured to—

(i) Permit insertion of alternate prices for each deliverable contract line item number that uses

precious metals; and

(ii) Use dual pricing evaluation procedures.

Parent topic: PGI 208.73 -USE OF GOVERNMENT-OWNED PRECIOUS METALS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-28-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-30-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-28-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                             438
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   79,979
<ALLOWANCES>                                       710
<INVENTORY>                                    161,948
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               255,034
<PP&E>                                         345,108
<DEPRECIATION>                                 173,142
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 433,675
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          126,953
<BONDS>                                        133,197
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        79,469
<OTHER-SE>                                      89,508
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   433,675
<SALES>                                        272,135
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               272,135
<CGS>                                          258,514
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  258,514
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                23,242
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,080
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (12,726)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (4,644)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (8,095)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (8,095)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.46)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.46)
        

</TABLE>
PGI 222.101-3 Reporting labor disputes.       The contract administration office shall—          (1) Notify the labor advisor, the contracting officer, and the head of the contracting activity when interference is likely; and          (2) Disseminate information on labor disputes in accordance with departmental procedures.    **PGI 222.101-3-70 Impact of labor disputes on defense programs.****Parent topic:** PGI 222.101 Labor relations.
Certification of Chief Financial Officer


Pursuant to 15 U.S.C. Section 10A, as Adopted Pursuant to


Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





I, Enrico Digirolamo, certify that:





|   |                                                                                                
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K of Covisint Corporation; and




|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.







July 25, 2017





By: /s/ ENRICO DIGIROLAMO


Enrico Digirolamo


Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit No. 32.  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the report of Questar Pipeline Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), R. Allan Bradley, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and S. E. Parks, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  QUESTAR PIPELINE COMPANY   November 7, 2008 /s/R. Allan Bradley R. Allan Bradley President and Chief Executive Officer    November 7, 2008 /s/S. E. Parks S. E. Parks Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
#### Octavio RODRIGO *v.*STATE of Arkansas

CA CR 06-1092

261 S.W.3d 465

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Opinion delivered September 6, 2007

*Danny Rasmussen,*for appellant.

No response.

Per Curiam.

Appellant Octavio Rodrigo, by and through his attorney Danny Rasmussen, has filed a motion for belated appeal. In the instant motion, Rasmussen admits that the initial notice of appeal filed in this matter was defective in that it reserved the right to appeal from the order denying Appellant’s motion to suppress rather than the judgment of conviction.

This court clarified its treatment of motions for rule on clerk and motions for belated appeals in *McDonald v. State,*356 Ark. 106, 146 S.W.3d 883 (2004). There, this court stated that there are only *474two possible reasons for an appeal not being timely perfected: either the party or attorney filing the appeal is at fault, or there is “good reason.” *Id.*at 116, 146 S.W.3d at 891. We explained:

> Where an appeal is not timely perfected, either the party or attorney filing the appeal is at fault, or there is good reason that the appeal was not timely perfected. The party or attorney filing the appeal is therefore faced with two options. First, where the party or attorney filing the appeal is at fault, fault should be admitted by affidavit filed with the motion or in the motion itself. There is no advantage in declining to admit fault where fault exists. Second, where the party or attorney believes that there is good reason the appeal was not perfected, the case for good reason can be made in the motion, and this court will decide whether good reason is present.

*Id.*(footnote omitted). While this court no longer requires an affidavit admitting fault before we will consider the motion, an attorney should candidly admit fault where he has erred and is responsible for the failure to perfect the appeal. *See id.*

In accordance with *McDonald,*Mr. Rasmussen has candidly admitted fault. The motion is, therefore, granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Motion granted.

Danielson, J., not participating.
exv10w3






 





Exhibit 10.3




Amendment

The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. 1993 Employee Stock Incentive Plan, as

Amended and Restated as of December 6, 2006 (the “Plan”)



     Effective as of January 1, 2010, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. 1993 Employee Stock Incentive
Plan, as Amended and Restated as of December 6, 2006 (the “Plan”), unless otherwise provided, be
and hereby amended as set forth below:




Section 2. Administration. Section 2(c) is hereby added to the Plan immediately
following the existing Section 2(b), as follows:




“(c) Subject to the applicable listing requirements of the New York Stock Exchange,
the Committee may, but need not, from time to time delegate some or all of its
authority under the Plan to one or more members of the Committee or to one or more
officers of the Company; provided, that the Committee may not delegate its
authority under Section 2(b) or its authority to make Qualifying Awards or Awards
to participants who are delegated authority hereunder or who are subject to the
reporting rules under Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act at the time the Award is
made. Any delegation hereunder shall be subject to the restrictions and limits
that the Committee specifies at the time of such delegation or thereafter. Nothing
in the Plan shall be construed as obligating the Committee to delegate any
authority to any person or persons hereunder. The Committee may, at any time,
rescind any delegation hereunder and any person or persons who are delegated
authority hereunder shall, at all times, serve or perform in such capacity at the
pleasure of the Committee. Any action undertaken by any person or persons in
accordance with a delegation hereunder shall have the same force and effect as if
undertaken directly by the Committee, and any reference in the Plan to the
Committee shall, to the extent consistent with the terms and limitations of such
delegation, be deemed to include a reference to such person or persons.”



* * * * *





Except as set forth herein, the Plan remains in full force and effect.
#### LOWE v. LEARY et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

June 26, 1914.)

Action by Marie C. Lowe against Mary C. Leary and others.

J. B. Stanchfield, of New York City, for appellant.

H. Pegram, W. W. Pellet Finn & McAndrews, and D. P. Hays, all of New York City, for respondents.

No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs. Order filed. See, also, 148 N. Y. Supp. 1127.
PGI 215.404-2 Data to support proposal

analysis.

(a) Field pricing assistance.

(i) The contracting officer should consider requesting field pricing assistance (See PGI 215.404-2 (c)

for when audit assistance should be requested) for—

(A) Fixed-price proposals exceeding the certified cost or pricing data threshold;

(B) Cost-type proposals exceeding the certified cost or pricing data threshold from offerors with

significant estimating system deficiencies (see DFARS 215.407-5-70(a)(4) and (c)(2)(i)); or

(C) Cost-type proposals exceeding $10 million from offerors without significant estimating system

deficiencies.

(ii) The contracting officer should not request field pricing support for proposed contracts or

modifications in an amount less than that specified in paragraph (a)(i) of this subsection. An

exception may be made when a reasonable pricing result cannot be established because of—

(A) A lack of knowledge of the particular offeror; or

(B) Sensitive conditions (e.g., a change in, or unusual problems with, an offeror’s internal systems).

(c) Audit assistance for prime contracts or subcontracts.

(i) The contracting officer should consider requesting audit assistance from DCAA for—

(A) Fixed-price proposals exceeding $10 million;

(B) Cost-type proposals exceeding $100 million.

(ii) The contracting officer should not request DCAA audit assistance for proposed contracts or

modifications in an amount less than that specified in paragraph (c)(i) of this subsection unless there

are exceptional circumstances explained in the request for audit. (See PGI 215.404-2 (a)(i) for

requesting field pricing assistance without a DCAA audit.)

(iii) If, in the opinion of the contracting officer or auditor, the review of a prime contractor's proposal

requires further review of subcontractors' cost estimates at the subcontractors' plants (after due

consideration of reviews performed by the prime contractor), the contracting officer should inform

the administrative contracting officer (ACO) having cognizance of the prime contractor before the

review is initiated.

(iv) Notify the appropriate contract administration activities when extensive, special, or expedited

field pricing assistance will be needed to review and evaluate subcontractors' proposals under a

major weapon system acquisition. If audit reports are received on contracting actions that are

subsequently cancelled, notify the cognizant auditor in writing.

(v) Requests for audit assistance for subcontracts should use the same criteria as established in

paragraphs (c)(i) and (c)(ii) of this subsection.
Parent topic: PGI 215.404 Proposal analysis.
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, DC 20549

 

 

**FORM 10-Q** **x Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of The Securities Exchange Act of 1934**

**For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009**

 

**Commission File Number 0-26589**

 

 

**THE FIRST BANCORP, INC.**

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)**MAINE****01-0404322**

(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

 

**MAIN STREET,   DAMARISCOTTA,   MAINE          04543**

(Address of principal executive offices)                                 (Zip code)

 

**(207) 563-3195**

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code

 

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

**Yes x    No[_]**

 

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

**Large accelerated filer [_]    Accelerated filer x    Non-accelerated filer [_]**

 

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).

**Yes [_]    No x**

 

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant’s classes of common stock as of November 4, 2009

**Common Stock: 9,743,070 shares**

 

 

----
`[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 493 Reported in House (RH)]







                                                 House Calendar No. 102
109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 493

                          [Report No. 109-248]

  Providing for consideration of the bill (S. 397) to prohibit civil 
       liability actions from being brought or continued against 
   manufacturers, distributors, dealers, or importers of firearms or 
 ammunition for damages, injunctive or other relief resulting from the 
                  misuse of their products by others.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 17, 2005

   Mr. Gingrey, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION


 
  Providing for consideration of the bill (S. 397) to prohibit civil 
       liability actions from being brought or continued against 
   manufacturers, distributors, dealers, or importers of firearms or 
 ammunition for damages, injunctive or other relief resulting from the 
                  misuse of their products by others.

    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order without intervention of any point of order to consider in the 
House the bill (S. 397) to prohibit civil liability actions from being 
brought or continued against manufacturers, distributors, dealers, or 
importers of firearms or ammunition for damages, injunctive or other 
relief resulting from the misuse of their products by others. The bill 
shall be considered as read. The previous question shall be considered 
as ordered on the bill to final passage without intervening motion 
except: (1) one hour of debate equally divided and controlled by the 
chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on the Judiciary; 
and (2) one motion to recommit.
                                                 House Calendar No. 102

109th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                              H. RES. 493

                          [Report No. 109-248]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

  Providing for consideration of the bill (S. 397) to prohibit civil 
       liability actions from being brought or continued against 
   manufacturers, distributors, dealers, or importers of firearms or 
 ammunition for damages, injunctive or other relief resulting from the 
                  misuse of their products by others.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            October 17, 2005

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed`
#### § 600.103 Deviations.

The deviation provisions of § 600.4 apply to this subpart.
1815.7003 Contract clause.

The contracting officer shall insert a clause substantially the same as the one at 1852.215–84,

Ombudsman, in all solicitations (including draft solicitations) and contracts.

Parent topic: Subpart 1815.70—Ombudsman
§ 60.4 Communications and records. ( a ) Except where otherwise specified, all communications and reports concerning the regulations in this part and applications filed under them should be sent by mail addressed: ATTN: Document Control Desk: Director, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001; by hand delivery to the NRC's offices at 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland; or, where practicable, by electronic submission, for example, via Electronic Information Exchange, or CD-ROM. Electronic submissions must be made in a manner that enables the NRC to receive, read, authenticate, distribute, and archive the submission, and process and retrieve it a single page at a time. Detailed guidance on making electronic submissions can be obtained by visiting the NRC's Web site at *http://www.nrc.gov/site-help/e-submittals.html*; by e-mail to *MSHD.Resource@nrc.gov*; or by writing the Office of the Chief Information Officer, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001. The guidance discusses, among other topics, the formats the NRC can accept, the use of electronic signatures, and the treatment of nonpublic information.
( b ) Each record required by this part must be legible throughout the retention period specified by each Commission regulation. The record may be the original or a reproduced copy or a microform provided that the copy or microform is authenticated by authorized personnel and that the microform is capable of producing a clear copy throughout the required retention period. The record may also be stored in electronic media with the capability for producing legible, accurate, and complete records during the required retention period. Records such as letters, drawings, specifications, must include all pertinent information such as stamps, initials, and signatures. The licensee shall maintain adequate safeguards against tampering with and loss of records.
[53 FR 19251, May 27, 1988, as amended at 53 FR 43421, Oct. 27, 1988; 68 FR 58813, Oct. 10, 2003; 74 FR 62682, Dec. 1, 2009; 80 FR 74980, Dec. 1, 2015]
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-1649

BRIAN DALE ATEN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

WALLACE H. WIGGINS, JR., owner of LPS Construction Company,

Defendant - Appellee,

and

RICHLAND COUNTY; JOHN DOE, in their individual and/or official capacity; 

ARCHITECTS, CONTRACTORS, AND SUBCONTRACTORS OF THE ALVIN 

S. GLENN DETENTION CENTER, in their individual and/or official capacity; 

ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ALVIN S. GLENN DETENTION CENTER, in their 

individual and/or official capacity; SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF 

CORRECTIONS; M. B. KAHN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., 

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at 

Orangeburg. Donald C. Coggins, Jr., District Judge. (5:16-cv-03614-DCC)

Submitted: February 26, 2021 Decided: March 12, 2021

Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
2

Brian Dale Aten, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

Brian Dale Aten appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to

Defendants in Aten’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. We have reviewed the record and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Aten 

v. Wiggins, No. 5:16-cv-03614-DCC (D.S.C. July 2, 2018 & Aug. 29, 2018). We dispense 

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED