alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
PART 726—OTHER SOCIOECONOMIC

PROGRAMS

Authority: Sec. 621, Pub. L. 87–195, 75 Stat. 445, (22 U.S.C. 2381) as amended; E.O.12163, Sept.

29, 1979, 44 FR 56673; 3 CFR, 1979 Comp., p. 435.

Source: 55 FR 8470, Mar. 8, 1990, unless otherwise noted.

Subpart 726.70 [Reserved]

Subpart 726.71—Trade and Investment Activities and the “Impact on U.S. Jobs” and “Workers'

Rights

726.7101 Trade and Investment Activities and the “Impact on U.S. Jobs” and “Workers' Rights.”

Parent topic: SUBCHAPTER D—SOCIOECONOMIC PROGRAMS

Subpart 726.70 [Reserved]

Subpart 726.71—Trade and Investment Activities and the

“Impact on U.S. Jobs” and “Workers' Rights

726.7101 Trade and Investment Activities and the “Impact on U.S. Jobs” and

“Workers' Rights.”

(a) Policy. USAID policy and required procedures in ADS Chapter 225 (Program Principles for Trade

and Investment Activities and the “Impact on U.S. Jobs” and “Workers' Rights”) implement statutory

prohibitions on obligation and expenditure of appropriated funds. ADS Chapter 225 requires Agency

operating units to analyze a project or activity to ensure compliance with U.S. foreign policy

objectives as stated in Section 601 of the Foreign Assistance Act (FAA) of 1961, as amended; the

U.S. Government's trade and development objectives set forth in trade legislation; and related policy

documents. If the analysis concludes that the project or activity meets the criteria for what the ADS

chapter describes as “gray-area activities” or if the contract statement of work has the potential to

evolve into what the chapter defines as a prohibited activity, then the planner must include in the

procurement request language appropriately tailored to the specific circumstances for the contract

statement of work.

(b) Special contract requirement. The contracting officer must insert in Section H of the uniform

contract format a clause substantially the same as the clause in 752.226–70 when informed by the

requesting operating unit that the statement of work or statement of objectives includes gray-area

activities or investment-related activities where specific activities are not identified at the time of

obligation but could be for investment-related activities, as described in ADS Chapter 225.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-05-00285-CR

NO. 03-05-00286-CR

Robert Michael Porter, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 5 OF TRAVIS COUNTY

NOS. 695017 & 695018

HONORABLE NANCY WRIGHT HOHENGARTEN, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Informations accusing appellant Robert Michael Porter of possessing less than two

ounces of marihuana and evading arrest were filed in Travis County cause numbers 695017 and

695018. At his trial in cause number 695018, Porter admitted his guilt in cause number 695017 and

that unadjudicated offense was taken into consideration in determining his sentence. See Tex. Pen.

Code Ann. § 12.45 (West 2003). Porter filed notices of appeal in both causes.

There is no right of appeal from an order granting a section 12.45 motion. Lackie v.

State, 70 S.W.3d 344, 345 (Tex. App.—Waco 2002, no pet.); Hilburn v. State, 946 S.W.2d 885, 886

(Tex. App.—Fort Worth 1997, no pet.). Appeal number 03-05-00285-CR is dismissed.
2

The trial court has certified that cause number 695018 is a plea bargain case and

Porter has no right of appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2). Appeal number 03-05-00286-CR is

dismissed. See id. rule 25.2(d).

__________________________________________

Bea Ann Smith, Justice

Before Justices B. A. Smith, Puryear and Pemberton

Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction

Filed: June 17, 2005

Do Not Publish
§ 1013.41 Stay pending appeal. ( a ) An initial decision is stayed automatically pending disposition of a motion for reconsideration or of an appeal to the authority head.
( b ) No administrative stay is available following a final decision of the authority head.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsBOREAS TE-12 SSA Shoot Geometry DataThe Boreal Ecosystem-Atmospheric Study (BOREAS) TE-12 (Terrestrial Ecology) team collected shoot geometry data in 1993 and 1994 from aspen, jack pine, and black spruce trees. Collections were made at the Southern Study Area Nipawin Fen Site (SSA FEN), Young Jack Pine (YJP), Old Jack Pine (OJP), Old Aspen (OA), Young Aspen (YA), Mixed Site (MIX), and Old Black Spruce (OBS) sites. A caliper was used to measure shoot and needle lengths and widths. A volume displacement procedure was used to measure the weight of the shoot or twig submerged in water. The data files are available on a CD-ROM (see document number 20010000884), or from the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) Distributed Active Archive Center (DAAC).Document ID20010004228Acquisition SourceGoddard Space Flight CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsHall, Forrest G.*(NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt, MD United States)*Curd, Shelaine*(Raytheon Information Technology and Scientific Services Greenbelt, MD United States)*Walter-Shea, Elizabeth A.*(Nebraska Univ. Lincoln, NE United States)*Mesarch, Mark A.*(Nebraska Univ. Lincoln, NE United States)*Cheng, L.*(Nebraska Univ. Lincoln, NE United States)*Yang, Litao*(Nebraska Univ. Lincoln, NE United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 7, 2013Publication DateOctober 1, 2000Subject CategoryEarth Resources And Remote SensingReport/Patent NumberRept-2000-03136-0/VOL169NASA/TM-2000-209891/VOL169NAS 1.15:209891/VOL169Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 462-33-01Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20010004228.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
2405.502 Authority.       Use of paid advertisements in newspapers, trade journals, and other media are authorized by Delegations or Redelegations of Authority, subject to the availability of funds.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 2405.5 - Paid Advertisements
Exhibit 35.2








ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

Reference
is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of March 1, 2013, by and among DEUTSCHE MORTGAGE &
ASSET RECEIVING CORPORATION, as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL
ASSOCIATION, as Special Servicer, U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee, PARK BRIDGE LENDER SERVICES LLC, as Operating Advisor
and DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS, as Certificate Administrator, Paying Agent and Custodian with respect to Commercial Mortgage
Pass-Through Certificates, Series COMM 2013-CCRE6 (the “Agreement”). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined
shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

Pursuant
to Section 10.11 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Marthinsen, Managing Director of Special Servicing do hereby certify that:

| | 1. | A review of the activities of the Special Servicer during the period from
January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance per the Agreement during
such period has been made under my supervision, and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Special Servicer
has fulfilled all of its obligations under this Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 4th day of March 2016.



Daniel Marthinsen 
Managing Director 
Wells Fargo
Bank
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULES 13a-14(a)

I, Andrew Sassine, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this Amendment to Annual Report on Form 10-K of Arcturus Therapeutics Ltd.; and

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

 

 

| Date: April 10, 2019 |   | By:    | /s/ Andrew Sassine                                             |
|----------------------|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                 |   |   | Andrew Sassine                                                      |
|                 |   |   | Director and Chief Financial Officer

(principal financial officer) |
PGI 244.201-1 Consent requirements.

When contracting for a covered system or covered item of supply, work with the requiring activity to

determine if, based on the criticality of the component or system to be supplied and potential

concerns about supply chain risk, written consent to subcontract by the contracting officer is

necessary when subcontractors are selected or modified during the course of contract performance.

Should the requiring activity conclude that a potential subcontractor is beyond the risk tolerance of

the system and mission, the requiring activity must inform the contracting officer and the authority

granted in section 806 of Pub. L. 111-383 may be used to withhold consent for the contractor to

subcontract with a particular source or exclude a source from consideration as specified in DFARS

239.73.

Parent topic: PGI 244.201 Consent and advance notification requirements.
#### Sam Lang, Appellant, v. Illinois Greyhound Lines, Inc., Appellee.

Gen. No. 41,061.

opinion filed June 24, 1940;

rehearing denied *270July 8, 1940.

Frank E. Gettleman and Julius S. Neale, for appellant; Clarence T. Morse, of counsel; Ryan, Condon & Livingston, for appellee; John M. Tuohy, of counsel.

Opinion by

Justice McSurely.

“Not to be published in full.’’
Certification


Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18,
United States Code)





Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of FNB Corp., a North Carolina corporation (the Corporation), does hereby certify that:





The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2002 (the Form 10-Q) of the Corporation fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all materials respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.





Date:

November 14, 2002





/s/    MICHAEL C. MILLERMichael C. Miller Chief Executive Officer





Date:

November 14, 2002





/s/    JERRY A. LITTLEJerry A. Little Chief Financial Officer





The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document.
###### Editorial Note on Part 1045

#### Editorial Notes:Nomenclature changes to part 1045 appear at 88 FR 41294, June 26, 2023, and 88 FR 82238, Nov. 24, 2023.

§ 1045.85 How is information determined to be FRD or TFNI and can FRD or TFNI be returned to the RD category?

Editorial Notes:

Nomenclature changes to part 1045 appear at 88 FR 41294, June 26, 2023, and 88 FR 82238, Nov. 24, 2023.

(a) To be eligible to become FRD or TFNI, information must first be classified as RD in accordance with the AEA and this part. FRD and TFNI are removed from and may be returned to the RD category under section 142 of the AEA. The process by which information is removed from the RD category and placed into the FRD or TFNI category or returned to the RD category is called transclassification and involves the following decisions:

(1) For information to be transclassified from RD to the FRD category, the Director, Office of Environment, Health, Safety and Security and the appropriate official within DoD (as specified in DoD Instruction 5210.02 or subsequent instructions) must jointly determine that the information relates primarily to the military utilization of nuclear weapons and can be adequately protected in a manner similar to NSI.

(2) For information to be transclassified from RD to the TFNI category, the Director, Office of Environment, Health, Safety and Security and the DNI must jointly determine that information concerning a foreign nuclear energy program that falls under the RD definition must be removed from the RD category in order to carry out the provisions of the National Security Act of 1947, as amended, and can be adequately protected in a manner similar to NSI.

(b) The process to return FRD and TFNI to the RD category is as follows:

(1) FRD may be returned to the RD category if the DOE and DoD jointly determine that the programmatic requirements that caused the information to be removed from the RD category no longer apply, the information would be more appropriately protected as RD and returning the information to the RD category is in the interest of national security. DOE jointly with DoD must notify all appropriate agencies of the change.

(2) TFNI may be returned to the RD category if the DOE and the DNI jointly determine that the programmatic requirements that caused the information to be removed from the RD category no longer apply, the information would be more appropriately protected as RD and returning the information to the RD category is in the interest of national security. DOE jointly with the DNI must notify all appropriate agencies of the change.

[83 FR 66007, Dec. 21, 2018, as amended at 88 FR 41294, June 26, 2023]
Case 1:06-cv-00774-MHT-SRW Document 6 Filed 10/02/2006 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:06-cv-00774-MHT-SRW Document 6 Filed 10/02/2006 Page 2 of 2
2432.006 Reduction or suspension of

contract payments upon finding of fraud.

Parent topic: PART 2432 - CONTRACT FINANCING
MISCELLANEOUS DISMISSALS

2008-0056.

#### In re Contempt of Marshall.

Cuyahoga App. No. 88780, 2007-Ohio-6639. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal and claimed appeal of right. Upon consideration of appellant’s emergency consideration for immediate stay of execution of judgment pending appeal,

It is ordered by the court that the emergency consideration for stay is denied.

It further appears from the records of the court that the appellant has not filed a memorandum in support of jurisdiction, due February 7, 2008, in compliance with the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court and therefore has failed to prosecute this cause with the requisite diligence. Upon consideration thereof,

It is ordered by the court that this cause is dismissed sua sponte.
# Subpart 2816.2 - Fixed-Price Contracts

**Parent topic:**PART 2816 - TYPES OF CONTRACTS

## 2816.207 Firm-fixed-price, level-of-effort term contracts.

## 2816.207-3 Limitations.

The BPC or designee is the chief of the contracting office for the purposes of FAR 16.207-3(d).
§ 1304.105 Requests for access to records. ( a ) All requests for records should include the following information: ( 1 ) Full name, address, and telephone number of requester.
( 2 ) The system of records containing the desired information.
( 3 ) Any other information that the requester believes would help locate the record.
( b ) *Requests in writing.* A person may request access to his or her own records in writing by addressing a letter to: Privacy Act Officer; U.S. Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board; 2300 Clarendon Blvd., Suite 1300; Arlington, VA 22201.
( c ) *Requests via the internet.* Internet requests should be transmitted through the Board's Web site at *www.nwtrb.gov ,* using the “Contact NWTRB” icon on the bottom of the main page. The words “Privacy Act” should appear on the subject line.
( d ) *Requests in person.* Any person may examine and request copies of his or her own records on the Board's premises. The requester should contact the Board's offices at least one week before the desired appointment date. This request may be made to the Privacy Act Officer in writing, via the Internet, or by calling 703-235-4473.
( e ) Before viewing the records, proof of identification, must be provided. The identification should be a valid copy of one of the following:
A government ID, A driver's license, A passport, or Other current identification that contains both an address and a picture of the requester.
#### Susan WHITMAN *v.*STATE of Arkansas

CR 07-464

257 S.W.3d 901

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Opinion delivered May 31, 2007

*Susan Whitmore,*for appellant.

No response.

Per Curiam.

Appellant Susan Whitman, by and through her attorney, has filed a motion for rule on clerk. Her *172attorney, Don Cooksey, states in the motion that he mistakenly filed the record in this case on May 4, 2007, three days after the May 1, 2007 deadline for filing the record.

This court clarified its treatment of motions for rule on clerk and motions for belated appeal in *McDonald v. State,*356 Ark. 106, 146 S.W.3d 883 (2004). In that case, we said that there are only two possible reasons for an appeal not being timely perfected: either the party or attorney filing the appeal is at fault, or there is “good reason.” 356 Ark. at 116, 146 S.W.3d at 891. We explained:

> Where an appeal is not timely perfected, either the party or attorney filing the appeal is at fault, or there is good reason that the appeal was not timely perfected. The party or attorney filing the appeal is therefore faced with two options. First, where the party or attorney filing the appeal is at fault, fault should be admitted by affidavit filed with the motion or in the motion itself. There is no advantage in declining to admit fault where fault exists. Second, where the party or attorney believes that there is good reason the appeal was not perfected, the case for good reason can be made in the motion, and this court will decide whether good reason is present.

*Id.,*146 S.W.3d at 891 (footnote omitted). While this court no longer requires an affidavit admitting fault before we will consider the motion, an attorney should candidly admit fault when he or she has erred and is responsible for the failure to perfect the appeal. *See id.*

In accordance with *McDonald v. State, supra,*Mr. Cooksey has admitted that he confused the dates. The motion, is, therefore, granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Motion granted.
From: Gary Davis [gdavis@endicott.com]

Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2013 4:34 PM

To: Telander, Jeff

Cc: 'Susan Miller' Subject: Small Business Panel

Jeff Telander U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Mail Code: D243-02

109 TW Alexander Drive Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709

Dear Jeff,

I was an attendee at the March 14 Pre-Panel meeting of SER’s pertaining to the Brick and Structural Cl ay MACT, and do appreciate the time you spent with us in presenting information from EPA, and listening t o our side of the issue. Needless to say, we have som e very serious concerns leading to a new Brick MACT. Susan Miller is presenting a letter on behalf of the SER entity which summarizes our concerns and recommendations, that we hope you will consider . This is of utmost importance to our small, but vi tal industry.

Please know that this company is in full support of the letter Susan is sending to you today. Your understanding of our plight and position is vital t o our future.

Gary S. Davis, VP of Sales Endicott Clay Products Co

Endicott Tile LLC Telephone: 402.729.3315

Fax: 402.729.5804
Editorial Note on Part 1
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear at 78 FR 34247, June 7, 2013.

§ 1.39 Office of the Chief Human Capital Officer. The Office of the Chief Human Capital Officer— ( a ) Plans and implements NRC policies, programs, and services to provide for the effective organization, utilization, and development of the agency's human resources;
( b ) Provides labor relations and personnel policy guidance and supporting services to NRC managers and employees;
( c ) Provides training, benefits administration, and counseling services for NRC employees;
( d ) Collects, analyzes, and provides data on the characteristics, allocation, utilization, and retention of NRC's workforce;
( e ) Provides staffing advice and services to NRC managers and employees; and
( f ) Provides executive resources management and organizational and managerial development services to the NRC.
[52 FR 31602, Aug. 21, 1987, as amended at 63 FR 15742, Apr. 1, 1998; 78 FR 34247, June 7, 2013]
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 238 (Monday, December 13, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 77645]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-31147]



[[Page 77645]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Disease, Disability, and Injury Prevention and Control Special 
Emphasis Panel (SEP): Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System 
(PRAMS), DP11-001 Panel E, Initial Review

    In accordance with Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention (CDC) announces the aforementioned meeting:

    Time and Date: 10 a.m.-5 p.m., March 8, 2011 (Closed).
    Place: Teleconference.
    Status: The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance 
with provisions set forth in Section 552b(c)(4) and (6), Title 5 
U.S.C., and the Determination of the Director, Management Analysis 
and Services Office, CDC, pursuant to Public Law 92-463.
    Matters To Be Discussed: The meeting will include the initial 
review, discussion, and evaluation of ``Pregnancy Risk Assessment 
Monitoring System (PRAMS), DP11-001 Panel E.''
    Contact Person for More Information: Donald Blackman, Ph.D., 
Scientific Review Officer, CDC, National Center for Chronic Disease 
Prevention and Health Promotion, Office of the Director, Extramural 
Research Program Office, 4770 Buford Highway, NE., Mailstop K-92, 
Atlanta, GA 30341, Telephone: (770) 488-3023, e-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#89cdcbd0bec9eaedeaa7eee6ff"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="195d5b402e597a7d7a377e766f">[email protected]</span></a>.
    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been 
delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices pertaining 
to announcements of meetings and other committee management 
activities, for both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 
and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.

    Dated: December 2, 2010.
Elaine L. Baker,
Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2010-31147 Filed 12-10-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>