alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
`[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 393 Reported in House (RH)]







                                                  House Calendar No. 75
109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 393

                          [Report No. 109-199]

   Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to 
  consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on 
                                 Rules.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 27, 2005

   Mrs. Capito, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION


 
   Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to 
  consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on 
                                 Rules.

    Resolved,  That the requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII for a 
two-thirds vote to consider a report from the Committee on Rules on the 
same day it is presented to the House is waived with respect to any 
resolution reported on the legislative day of July 28, 2005, providing 
for consideration or disposition of a conference report to accompany 
the bill (H.R. 3) to authorize funds for Federal-aid highways, highway 
safety programs, and transit programs, and for other purposes.
                                                  House Calendar No. 75

109th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                              H. RES. 393

                          [Report No. 109-199]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

   Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to 
  consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on 
                                 Rules.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             July 27, 2005

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed`
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 742 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 742

To prohibit any hiring freeze from affecting any Department of Defense 
           position at, or in support of, a public shipyard.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 30, 2017

Mr. Kilmer (for himself, Mr. Scott of Virginia, Ms. Hanabusa, Ms. Shea-
 Porter, Mr. Jones, and Mr. Cole) introduced the following bill; which 
    was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To prohibit any hiring freeze from affecting any Department of Defense 
           position at, or in support of, a public shipyard.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON HIRING FREEZE FROM AFFECTING DEPARTMENT OF 
              DEFENSE PUBLIC SHIPYARD POSITIONS.

    The memorandum titled ``Presidential Memorandum Regarding the 
Hiring Freeze'' published on January 23, 2017, or any other 
substantially similar memorandum, Executive order, or other action by 
the President to prevent a department or agency of the Federal 
Government from filling vacant Federal civilian employee positions or 
creating new such positions, shall have no force or effect with respect 
to any Department of Defense civilian position under which an employee 
performs a Department of Defense function at a public shipyard or a 
Department of Defense function that directly supports a public 
shipyard.
                                 <all>
```
222 So.2d 885

#### STATE of Louisiana v. SUMMIT FIDELITY AND SURETY COMPANY et al.

No. 49915.

June 9, 1969.

In re: Summit Fidelity and Surety Company et al. applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition and mandamus.

Writs denied. The showing made in the application is insufficient to warrant the exercise of either our supervisory or original jurisdiction.
Editorial Note on Part 40
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 40 appear at 79 FR 75740, Dec. 19, 2014.

§ 40.82 Criminal penalties. ( a ) Section 223 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, provides for criminal sanctions for willful violation of, attempted violation of, or conspiracy to violate, any regulation issued under sections 161b, 161i, or 161o of the Act. For purposes of section 223, all the regulations in part 40 are issued under one or more of sections 161b, 161i, or 161o, except for the sections listed in paragraph (b) of this section.
( b ) The regulations in part 40 that are not issued under sections 161b, 161i, or 161o for the purposes of section 223 are as follows: §§ 40.1, 40.2, 40.2a, 40.4, 40.5, 40.6, 40.8, 40.11, 40.12, 40.13, 40.14, 40.20, 40.21, 40.31, 40.32, 40.34, 40.43, 40.44, 40.45, 40.52, 40.54, 40.71, 40.81, and 40.82.
[57 FR 55075, Nov. 24, 1992, as amended at 78 FR 32341, May 29, 2013]
§ 440.19 Labor. Payments for labor costs under § 440.18(c)(2) must consist of: ( a ) Payments permitted by the Department of Labor to supplement wages paid to training participants, public service employment workers, or other Federal or State training programs; and
( b ) Payments to employ labor or to engage a contractor (particularly a nonprofit organization or a business owned by disadvantaged individuals which performs weatherization services), provided a grantee has determined an adequate number of volunteers, training participants, public service employment workers, or other Federal or State training programs are not available to weatherize dwelling units for a subgrantee under the supervision of qualified supervisors.
[65 FR 77218, Dec. 8, 2000]
**Exhibit 32.1**

**Certification of Chief Executive Officer Under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

The undersigned officer of The First Bancorp, Inc.  (the "Company") hereby certifies that the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008 to which this certification is being furnished as an exhibit (the "Report"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. This certification is provided pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K ("Item 601(b)(32)") promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"), and the Exchange Act. In accordance with clause (ii) of Item601(b)(32), this certification (A) shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and (B) shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.

 

Date: November 6, 2008

 

/s/ Daniel R. Daigneault

Daniel R. Daigneault

President & Chief Executive Officer

The First Bancorp, Inc.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 3 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                       January 4, 2005.
    Resolved, That a committee of two Members be appointed by the Speaker on the 
part of the House of Representatives to join with a committee on the part of the 
Senate to notify the President of the United States that a quorum of each House 
has assembled and Congress is ready to receive any communication that he may be 
pleased to make.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
#### § 993.12 Substandard prunes.

*Substandard prunes* means any lot of processed or natural condition prunes failing to meet the applicable grade and size standards prescribed pursuant to §§ 993.49 and 993.50 other than pursuant to § 993.49(c).

[26 FR 476, Jan. 19, 1961, as amended at 37 FR 861, Jan. 20, 1972]
###### Editorial Note on Part 1045

#### Editorial Notes:Nomenclature changes to part 1045 appear at 88 FR 41294, June 26, 2023, and 88 FR 82238, Nov. 24, 2023.

§ 1045.100 How are RD, FRD, and TFNI declassified?

Editorial Notes:

Nomenclature changes to part 1045 appear at 88 FR 41294, June 26, 2023, and 88 FR 82238, Nov. 24, 2023.

(a) This section addresses the declassification of information, not derivatively classified matter. See Subpart D for requirements for the declassification of matter containing RD, FRD, or TFNI.

(b) RD and TFNI are declassified by the Director, Office of Environment, Health, Safety and Security by evaluating the criteria in § 1045.70. FRD requires the evaluation of the same criteria and a joint decision by the Director, Office of Environment, Health, Safety and Security and the appropriate DoD official (as specified in DoD Instruction 5210.02 or subsequent instructions).

[83 FR 66007, Dec. 21, 2018, as amended at 88 FR 41294, June 26, 2023]
#### § 431.171 Purpose and scope.

This subpart contains provisions regarding fans and blowers, pursuant to Part C of Title III of the Energy Policy and Conservation Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 6311-6317. This subpart does not cover “ceiling fans” as that term is defined and addressed in part 430 this chapter, nor does it cover “furnace fans” as that term is defined and addressed in part 430 of this chapter.
# 33.214 Alternative dispute resolution         (ADR).

The contracting officer shall insert the provision at                 5452.233-90015452.233-9001 Disputes – Agreement to Use Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) . in all solicitations unless the conditions at FAR             33.203(b) apply.

**Parent topic:**SUBPART 33.2 – DISPUTES AND APPEALS
1352.000 Scope of part.

This part sets forth solicitation provisions and contract clauses, in addition to those prescribed in

FAR Part 52, for use in DOC acquisitions.

Parent topic: PART 1352 - SOLICITATION PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT CLAUSES
#### § 20.2110 Form of records.

Each record required by this part must be legible throughout the specified retention period. The record may be the original or a reproduced copy or a microform provided that the copy or microform is authenticated by authorized personnel and that the microform is capable of producing a clear copy throughout the required retention period. The record may also be stored in electronic media with the capability for producing legible, accurate, and complete records during the required retention period. Records, such as letters, drawings, and specifications, must include all pertinent information, such as stamps, initials, and signatures. The licensee shall maintain adequate safeguards against tampering with and loss of records.
Ronald J. Jackson, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

GMAC Insurance et aI., 

Defendants. 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Civil Action No. 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

FILED 

MAR - 6 2009 

NANCy MAYER WHITTINGTON ClERK 

U.S. DISmlCT COURT' 

09 0439 

This matter is before the Court on plaintiff s pro se complaint and his application to 

proceed in forma pauperis. The Court will grant the application to proceed in forma pauperis 

and dismiss the complaint. 

The complaint seeks compensation for physical injuries the plaintiff incurred when the 

motor scooter he was riding was struck by another vehicle. He alleges that he was inadequately 

treated by the Veterans Administration (V A) Hospital for broken bones and other injuries from 

which he has not yet recovered in major respects. He names as defendants an insurance 

company, his legal counsel in the matter, and the V A. 

Unlike state courts of general jurisdiction, federal district courts are courts of limited 

jurisdiction. A federal district court does not have subject matter jurisdiction over claims that 

would require the court to determine first whether the V A provided appropriate medical care to 

the plaintiff. See Thomas v. Principi, 394 F.3d 970, 975 (D.C. Cir. 2005) (holding that 28 U.S.C. 

§ 511 deprives the district court of jurisdiction over such matters). Accordingly, the claim that 

the V A"under-treated" plaintiffs injuries will be dismissed with prejudice for lack of subject 
matter jurisdiction. Plaintiff s recourse as to that claim lies with the Secretary of Veterans 

Affairs. 

The claims suggested by the facts alleged in the complaint are state law claims. A federal 

court has jurisdiction of state law claims where the parties are of diverse citizenship - that is, 

where no defendant is a citizen of the same state as any plaintiff- and if the amount in 

controversy is alleged to be more than $75,000. See 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a). Here, the plaintiff did 

not assert that the amount in controversy is more than $75,000. Therefore, this court does not 

have diversity jurisdiction over the claims against the is complaint, and will dismiss the claims 

without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction. 

Because this court lacks either subject matter jurisdiction or diversity jurisdiction of the 

claims implied, the complaint will be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. A final order 

accompanies this memorandum opinion. 

United States District Judge 

2
PGI 217.7405 Plans and reports.       (1) By October 31 and April 30 of each year, military departments and defense agencies shall submit an updated Consolidated UCA Management Plan, and a Consolidated UCA Management Report, identifying each UCA with a value exceeding $5 million. Prior to submittal, military departments and defense agencies shall reconcile Federal Procurement Data System-Next Generation (FPDS-NG) data to the UCA information they are reporting to ensure both their FPDS-NG data and their Consolidated UCA Management Report are accurate and complete. In addition, military departments and defense agencies shall submit a copy of the record of weighted guidelines for each definitized UCA with a value of $100 million or more. If there is no record of weighted guidelines (e.g., not required for a cost plus award fee contract per DFARS 215.404-74), then military departments and defense agencies shall submit alternative documentation that addresses appropriate recognition of the contractor’s reduced cost risk during the undefinitized performance period. Submit the required information to osd.pentagon.ousd-a-s.mbx.asda-dp-c-contractpolicy@mail.mil.          (2) The Consolidated UCA Management Plan and the Consolidated UCA Management Report shall be prepared using the following formats:          (i) Consolidated UCA Management Plan          Title: Consolidated Undefinitized Contract Action (UCA) Management Plan Period Covered:          1. Applicable military department, defense agency, or DoD component. a. Headquarters point of contact. b. Contact information.          2. Description of actions planned and taken to ensure: a. Appropriate use of UCAs. b. Timely definitization of UCAs. c. Minimized obligation amounts at the time of UCA award, consistent with the contractor’s requirements for the undefinitized period. d. In determining profit/fee, appropriate recognition of the contractor’s reduced cost risk during the undefinitized performance period. e. Documentation of the risk assessment in the contract file.          3. Milestones for completion of planned events.          4. Other.          (ii)                 *Consolidated UCA Management Report.* The required format for the Consolidated UCA Management Report is available at this website: https://www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/dars/pgi/docs/uca_management_report_01Sep2021.xlsx.          (3) A list of Frequently Asked             Questions about UCA reporting requirements is available at https://www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/dars/pgi/docs/faq_01Sep2021.docx..    **Parent topic:** PGI 217.74 -UNDEFINITIZED CONTRACT ACTIONS
Exhibit 35.2

[First Republic Bank Logo]

Feb 28, 2017

Servicer Compliance Statement

For SEMT 2013-1 (see Schedule A)

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of First Republic Bank (the Servicer),
does hereby certify that:



| | (i) | a review of the Servicers activities during the reporting period from January 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016 and of its performance under the Agreement (as defined on Schedule A attached hereto) from
the above referenced trust during such period has been made under such officers supervision, and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | to the best of such officers knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under this Agreement in all material respects throughout such reporting period.
| | ---- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



First Republic BankBy:

/s/ Ron TremblayName:Ron TremblayTitle:  Vice President of Residential LendingDate:  Feb. 28, 2017




---

<for SEMT 2013-1>

SCHEDULE A



| | 1. | Flow Mortgage Loan Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of July 1, 2010, between Redwood Residential Acquisition Corporation and First Republic Bank, as modified by the Reconstitution Agreement dated
January 15, 2013 (the Agreement).
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Flow Mortgage Loan Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of July 1, 2010, between Redwood Residential Acquisition Corporation and First Republic Bank, as modified by the Reconstitution Agreement dated
September 18, 2012, among Barclays Bank, Redwood Residential Acquisition Corporation and First Republic Bank, and modified by the Reconstitution Agreement dated January 15, 2013 (the Agreement).
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Each of the foregoing an Agreement for purposes of this Servicer Compliance Statement.
March 17, 2015



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

ARBOR WINDSOR COURT, LTD

. , Appellant

NO. 14

- 13

- 00480

- CV V.

WEEKLEY HOMES, LP , Appellee

________________________________ This cause, an appeal from the judgment in favor of appel lee, Weekley Homes, LP, signed May 7, 2013 , was heard on the transcript of the recor d. We have inspected the record and find no error in the judgment. We order the judgment of the court below AFFIRMED

. We order appellant, Arbor Windsor Court, Ltd., to pay all costs incurred in this appeal.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
Exhibit
        32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION
        OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
        ACT
        OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
 
 In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of Simclar, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
        10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities
        and
        Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Barry J. Pardon,
        President of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for
        purpose of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code,
        that to
        the best of my knowledge:
 
 (1)  The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 
 (2)  The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 
 This
        Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, “filed” with the Securities
        and Exchange Commission.
 
 
 
 /s/
        Barry J. Pardon
 Barry
        J.
        Pardon, President
 Simclar,
        Inc.
 November
        14, 2007
PGI 245.201-70 Security classification.

Classified contracts are not exempt from including GFP attachments solely because the contracts

are classified.

Parent topic: PGI 245.201 Solicitation.
Exhibit 13.1

Certification by the Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Constellium N.V. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2014
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Pierre Vareille, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: April 24, 2015



|    |  |                     |  |                        
|--- |  | ------------------- |  | -----------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Pierre Vareille
|    |  | Name:               |  | Pierre Vareille        
|    |  | Title:              |  | Chief Executive Officer
BRYAN ANTHONY ROMERO

,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Respondent.

___________________________/ IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 14

- 3315

Opinion filed August 6, 2014.

Petition Alleging Ineffective Assistance of Appellate Counsel

-- Original

Jurisdiction

.

Bryan Anthony Romero, pro se , Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Responde nt.

PER CURIAM.

The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is denied on the

merits.

WOLF, ROBERTS, and ROWE, JJ.

, CONCUR.