alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) UNDER THE EXCHANGE ACT
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of B.H.I.T. Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant is made known to us by others, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    [Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238];c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andd)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Date: August 11, 2006
    By:
    /s/ James Benenson, Jr.James Benenson, Jr.President and Chief Executive Officer
```

[109th Congress Public Law 345]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ345.109]

[[Page 120 STAT. 1882]]

Public Law 109-345
109th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
  777 Corporation Street in Beaver, Pennsylvania, as the ``Robert Linn 
Memorial Post Office Building''. <<NOTE: Oct. 13, 2006 -  [H.R. 4768]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. ROBERT LINN MEMORIAL POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 777 Corporation Street in Beaver, Pennsylvania, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Robert Linn Memorial Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Robert Linn 
Memorial Post Office Building''.

    Approved October 13, 2006.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 4768:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 152 (2006):
            Sept. 20, considered and passed House.
            Sept. 29, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 995 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 995

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 29, 2017

   Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
    To direct the Secretary of Agriculture and the Secretary of the 
          Interior to modernize terms in certain regulations.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``21st Century Respect Act''.

SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS TO REGULATIONS REQUIRED.

    (a) Secretary of Agriculture.--The Secretary of Agriculture shall 
amend section 1901.202 of title 7, Code of Federal Regulations, for 
purposes of--
            (1) replacing the reference to the term ``Negro or Black'' 
        with ``Black or African American'';
            (2) replacing the reference to the term ``Spanish Surname'' 
        with ``Hispanic''; and
            (3) replacing the reference to the term ``Oriental'' with 
        ``Asian American or Pacific Islander''.
    (b) Secretary of the Interior.--The Secretary of the Interior shall 
amend section 906.2 of title 36, Code of Federal Regulations, for 
purposes of--
            (1) replacing the references to the term ``Negro'' with 
        ``Black or African American'';
            (2) replacing the definition of ``Negro'' with the 
        definition of ``Black or African American'' as ``a person 
        having origins in any of the Black racial groups of Africa'';
            (3) replacing the references to the term ``Oriental'' with 
        ``Asian American or Pacific Islander''; and
            (4) replacing the references to the terms ``Eskimo'' and 
        ``Aleut'' with ``Alaska Native''.

SEC. 3. RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.

    Nothing in this Act, or the amendments required by this Act, shall 
be construed to affect Federal law, except with respect to the use of 
terms by the Secretary of Agriculture and the Secretary of the 
Interior, respectively, to the regulations affected by this Act.

            Passed the House of Representatives November 28, 2017.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
EXHIBIT
32.2


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350 (AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002)





In
connection with Quarterly Report of Sionix Corporation (the “Company”) on
Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David
R. Wells, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to my knowledge and in
my capacity as an officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:




1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
  and,2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
      as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the
    Report.






Date:
      February 16, 2010
              By:
              /s/David
      R. WellsDavid
      R. WellsPresident,
      Chief Financial Officer, Secretary/Treasurer, and Principal Financial and
      Accounting Officer





A
certification furnished pursuant to this Item will not be deemed “filed” for
purposes of section 18 of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78r), or otherwise subject
to the liability of that section. Such certification will not be deemed to be
incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the
Exchange Act, except to the extent that the registrant specifically incorporates
it by reference.
#### In the Matter of James Fotis, Appellant, v Incorporated Village of Lynbrook et al., Respondents.

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered January 26, 1979, which dismissed the petition. The appeal brings up for review so much of an order of the same court, entered February 26,1979, as, upon reargument, adhered to the original determination. Appeal from the judgment dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements. The judgment was superseded by the order granting reargument. Order affirmed insofar as reviewed, without costs or disbursements. No opinion. Lazer, J. P., Gibbons, Gulotta and Cohalan, JJ., concur.
227 So.2d 143

#### Olga KENNY, Wife of/and Paul MALONEY, Jr. v. OAK BUILDERS, INC., et al.

No. 50049.

Oct. 23, 1969.

In re: Milford A. Friedrich, Jr., d/b/a Friedrich Refrigeration, and Bernard Wholesale Distributing Company, Inc., applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans. 224 So.2d 161.

It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that *805counsel for plaintiff and defendant be notified.

Granted but limited to the issue of attorney fees.
187420.1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

FARMERS TELECOMMUNICATIONS

COOPERATIVE, INC.,

Plaintiff,

v.

VERIZON BUSINESS NETWORK 

SERVICES INC. and QWEST 

COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Case No.

2:06-cv-00790-WC

JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

The parties to this cause, plaintiff Farmers Telecommunications Cooperative, Inc., and 

defendants Verizon Business Network Services Inc. and Qwest Communications Corporation, 

pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41, jointly stipulate to the dismissal with prejudice of this case with 

each party to bear its own costs, expenses, and fees.

Respectfully submitted this the 15th day of November, 2007.

s/Robin G. Laurie

One of the Attorneys for Defendant Qwest 

Communications Corporation

OF COUNSEL:

Robin G. Laurie (ASB-4217-U64R)

Joseph Seawell Moore (ASB-9146-O77M)

Balch & Bingham LLP

105 Tallapoosa Street, Suite 200

Montgomery, Alabama 36101

Telephone: (334) 834-6500

Fax: (334) 269-3115

Case 2:06-cv-00790-WC Document 62 Filed 11/15/2007 Page 1 of 2
187420.1

Leigh Anne Hodge (ASB-1008-E49L)

Balch & Bingham LLP

1710 Sixth Avenue North

Birmingham, Alabama 35203-2015

Telephone: (205) 226-8724

Fax: (205) 488-5698

s/Jonathan M. Hooks

One of the Attorneys for Farmers 

Telecommunications Cooperative, Inc.

OF COUNSEL:

Mark D. Wilkerson

Dana H. Billingsley

Wilkerson & Bryan, P.C.

P. O. Box 830

405 South Hull Street

Montgomery, Alabama 36101-0830

s/Bryan O. Balogh

One of the Attorneys for Verizon Business

Network Services, Inc.

OF COUNSEL:

Starnes & Atchison

P. O. Box 598512

Birmingham, Alabama 35259-8512

Sean A. Lev

Scott H. Angstreich

Kellogg, Huber, Hansen, Todd, Evans & Figel, P.L.L.C.

1615 M Street, N.W., Suite 400

Washington, D.C. 20036

Case 2:06-cv-00790-WC Document 62 Filed 11/15/2007 Page 2 of 2
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
You havereached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC)Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC.Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suite ofcataloging and locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications.  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the eventthat publications are no longer available from the original publishing agencysite. (Historical purposes)
**Title:**** 
SuDocNumber:WestVirginia NRCS news and views
ItemNumber:A57.81/48:
CGPSystem Number:0120-C-48(online)
 - 2010_05.pdf2010_08.pdf2010_11.pdf2011_05.pdf2011_11.pdf2012_02.pdf
 
March3, 2020**
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**SECTION 906 OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qof ImClone Systems Incorporated (the “Company”) for the quarter ended September 30,2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), Daniel S. Lynch, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, andMichael J. Howerton, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each herebycertifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

|                       | /s/ DANIEL S. LYNCH        |
|-----------------------|----------------------------|
|                  | Daniel S. Lynch            |
| * *              | *Chief  Executive Officer* |
| November 8, 2005 |                       |
|                  |                       |
|                  | /s/ MICHAEL J. HOWERTON    |
|                  | Michael J.  Howerton       |
| * *              | *Chief  Financial Officer* |
| November 8, 2005 |                       |

 

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent requiredby the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposesof Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained bythe Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.

----
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsBOREAS TE-9 PAR and Leaf Nitrogen Data for NSA SpeciesThe Boreal Ecosystem-Atmospheric Study (BOREAS) TE-9 (Terrestrial Ecology) team collected several data sets related to chemical and photosynthetic properties of leaves in boreal forest tree species. This data set describes the relationship between photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) levels and foliage nitrogen in samples from six sites in the BOREAS Northern Study Area (NSA) collected during the three 1994 intensive field campaigns (IFCs). This information is useful for modeling the vertical distribution of carbon fixation for these different forest types in the boreal forest. The data were collected to quantify the relationship between PAR and leaf nitrogen of black spruce, jack pine, and aspen. The data are available in tabular ASCII files. The data files are available on a CD-ROM (see document number 20010000884), or from the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) Distributed Active Archive Center (DAAC).Document ID20010004215Acquisition SourceGoddard Space Flight CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsHall, Forrest G.*(NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt, MD United States)*Curd, Shelaine*(Raytheon Information Technology and Scientific Services Greenbelt, MD United States)*Dang, Qinglai*(Lakehead Univ. Port Arthur, Ontario Canada)*Margolis, Hank*(Laval Univ. Sainte-Foye, Quebec Canada)*Coyea, Marie*(Laval Univ. Sainte-Foye, Quebec Canada)*Date AcquiredSeptember 7, 2013Publication DateOctober 1, 2000Subject CategoryEarth Resources And Remote SensingReport/Patent NumberNASA/TM-2000-209891/VOL158Rept-2000-03136-0/VOL158NAS 1.15:209891/VOL158Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 462-33-01Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20010004215.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### McCANN Respondent, v. VAN LOON, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

July 1, 1914.)

Action by Catherine McCann against Arthur B. Van Loon..

No opinion. Order affirmed, with costs.
§ 993.41 Marketing policy. ( a ) On or before the first Tuesday of each July, the committee shall prepare and submit to the Secretary a report setting forth its recommended marketing policy for the ensuing crop year. If it becomes advisable to modify such policy, because of changed demand, supply, or other conditions, the committee shall formulate a new policy and shall submit a report thereon to the Secretary. Notice of the committee's marketing policy, and of any modifications thereof, shall be given promptly by reasonable publicity to producers, dehydrators, and handlers.
( b ) In formulating its marketing policy for the ensuing crop year, the committee shall consider and shall include in its report to the Secretary, the following estimates (natural condition basis) and recommendations: ( 1 ) The carryover of salable prunes as of August 1;
( 2 ) The carryover of reserve prunes as of August 1;
( 3 ) The grade and size composition of the salable and reserve carryovers;
( 4 ) The quantity of prunes to be produced without regard to possible diversions of prune plums by producers;
( 5 ) The probable quality and prune sizes in the crop;
( 6 ) The domestic trade demand by uses of prunes;
( 7 ) The foreign trade demand by countries or groups of countries;
( 8 ) The desirable carryout of salable prunes at the end of the ensuing crop year;
( 9 ) The quantity of undersized prunes in the crop, itemized as to French prunes and non-French prunes;
( 10 ) The quantity of prunes to be withheld as reserve prunes so as to protect against errors of estimation and permit orderly marketing of the supply;
( 11 ) The recommended salable and reserve percentages;
( 12 ) The quantity of prune plums, dried weight basis, deemed desirable to be diverted pursuant to § 993.62;
( 13 ) Any recommended change in regulations pursuant to §§ 933.49 to 993.53, inclusive;
( 14 ) The probable assessable tonnage for the purposes of § 993.81; and
( 15 ) The current prices for prunes, the trend and level of consumer income, whether producer prices are likely to exceed parity, and such other factors as may have a bearing on the marketing of prunes or the administration of this part.
[30 FR 9798, Aug. 6, 1965, as amended at 37 FR 862, Jan. 20, 1972]
Exhibit 23.1

** **

** **

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLICACCOUNTING FIRM**

  

We hereby consent to the incorporationby reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (No. 333-198178) and Form S-8 (No. 333-200801), of Truett-Hurst, Inc. ofour report dated September 28, 2015, relating to the consolidated financial statements of Truett-Hurst, Inc. and subsidiaries,which appear in the Truett-Hurst, Inc. Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30,2015.

 

/s/ Burr Pilger Mayer, Inc.

 

Santa Rosa, California

September 28, 2015
#### SLAWSON & HOBBS v. ASPEL.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

January 29, 1915.)

Action by Slawson & Hobbs against Anna T. Aspel.

No opinion. Application denied, with $10 costs. Order signed.
§ 205.287 Escrow accounts, segregated funds and other guarantees. ( a ) In implementing the refund procedures specified in this subpart, the Director of the Office of Hearings and Appeals or his designee shall issue an order providing for the custody of the funds to be tendered pursuant to the Remedial Order or Consent Order. This Order may require placement of the funds in an appropriate interest-bearing escrow account, retention of the funds by the firm in a segregated account under such terms and conditions as are specified by the DOE, or the posting of a sufficient bond or other guarantee to ensure payment.
( b ) All costs and charges approved by the Office of Hearings and Appeals and incurred in connection with the processing of Applications for Refund or incurred by an escrow agent shall be paid from the amount of funds, including any accumulated interest, to be remitted pursuant to the Remedial Order or Consent Order.
( c ) After the expenses referred to in paragraph (b) of this section have been satisfied and refunds distributed to successful applicants, any remaining funds remitted pursuant to the Remedial Order or Consent Order shall be deposited in the United States Treasury or distributed in any other manner specified in the Decision and Order referred to in § 205.282(c).
( d ) Funds contained in an escrow account, segregated fund, or guaranteed by other approved means shall be disbursed only upon written order of the Office of Hearings and Appeals.