alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 399 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 399

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                         July 29, 2005.
    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider the conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 3) to authorize funds 
for Federal-aid highways, highway safety programs, and transit programs, and for 
other purposes. All points of order against the conference report and against 
its consideration are waived. The conference report shall be considered as read.
    Sec. 2. The Clerk shall not transmit to the Senate a message that it has 
adopted the conference report to accompany H.R. 3 until the House has received a 
message that the Senate has agreed to House Concurrent Resolution 226 as adopted 
by the House or passed H.R. 3514 without amendment.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Clean Systems  Technology Group,
Ltd. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
David Robbins,  President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company  certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.


Dated: April 12, 2005


By: /S/ YONA LIEBOWITZ
--------------------------
Yona Liebowitz
Chief Financial Officer


     This  certification  accompanies  the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  be deemed  filed by the  Company  for  purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
#### MATHESON v. MENTE et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

June 26, 1914.)

Action by Malcolm Ross Matheson, as substituted trustee, etc., against Ottilie Mente and others.

No opinion. Order, in so far as appealed from, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. See, also, 148 N. Y. Supp. 1130.
#### In the Matter of Esperanza Weis et al., Respondents, v Lorraine Rivera et al., Appellants.

[814 NYS2d 743]

In a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6 for grandparent visitation, the mother and father appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County (Lynaugh, J.), entered September 12, 2005, as, after a hearing, granted the petition.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs or disbursements.

The Family Court providently exercised its discretion in declining to appoint a Law Guardian to represent the child *(see Richard D. v Wendy P.,*47 NY2d 943, 944-945 [1979]; *Matter of Walker v Tollman,*256 AD2d 1021, 1022 [1998]; *Nacson v Nacson,*166 AD2d 510, 511 [1990]; *cf. Matter of Acosta v Acosta,*259 AD2d 747 [1999]; *Koppenhoefer v Koppenhoefer,*159 AD2d 113, 117 [1990]).

The petitioners, the subject child’s maternal grandmother and stepgrandfather, commenced the instant proceeding seeking visitation with the grandchild, despite the objections of the child’s parents. Grandparents have standing to bring such proceedings where “either or both of the parents ... is or are deceased” or where “conditions exist which equity would see fit to intervene” (Domestic Relations Law § 72 [1]; *see Matter of Emanuel S. v Joseph E.,*78 NY2d 178 [1991]). Here, the grandmother established that she made a sufficient effort to establish a relationship with the child *(see Matter of Emanuel S. v Joseph E., supra).*Accordingly, the grandmother established the requisite standing necessary for the Family Court to entertain the petition.

*813The question of visitation, which involves a determination of what is in the child’s best interests, is left to the discretion of the court *(see Lo Presti v Lo Presti,*40 NY2d 522, 527 [1976]). An essential part of this inquiry is whether a meaningful relationship exists between the petitioning grandparents and the child *(see Matter of Ziarno v Ziarno,*285 AD2d 793 [2001]; *Matter of Seymour S. v Glen S.,*189 AD2d 765 [1993]; *Matter of La Porte v Rivers,*144 AD2d 861 [1988]).

The Family Court providently exercised its discretion in determining that visitation with the grandmother was in the best interests of the child *(see*Domestic Relations Law § 72). The grandmother and stepgrandfather established that they enjoyed a longstanding loving relationship with the subject child before the dispute that gave rise to this litigation.

Since animosity between the child’s father and the petitioners is not a proper basis for the denial of visitation privileges to the grandmother, the Family Court properly granted the petition *(see Kampf v Worth,*108 AD2d 841, 842 [1985]; *Matter of Lachow v Barasch,*57 AD2d 896 [1977]; *Matter of Vacula v Blume,*53 AD2d 633 [1976]). Schmidt, J.P., Krausman, Mastro and Covello, JJ., concur.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

M IDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABA M A

OFFICE OF THE CLERK

POST OFFICE BOX 711

MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA 36101-0711

DEBRA P. HACKETT, CLERK

TELEPHONE (334) 954-3600

September 14, 2007

NOTICE OF ERROR

To: All Counsel of Record

Case Style: Gray v. Alexander et al

Case Number: 2:06cv00749-ID

Referenced Pleading: Request for Admissions

Docket Entry Number: 14

The referenced pleading was filed on ***September 13, 2007*** in this case and 

is hereby STRICKEN as an erroneous docket entry. 

Parties are instructed to disregard #14 docketing entry, which has been stricken from the

record as a docketing error.

Case 2:06-cv-00749-ID-SRW Document 15 Filed 09/14/2007 Page 1 of 1
PGI 208.7002-1 Acquiring department responsibilities.       The acquiring department generally is responsible under coordinated acquisition for—          (1) Operational aspects of acquisition planning (phasing the submission of requirements to contracting, consolidating or dividing requirements, analyzing the market, and determining patterns for the phased placement of orders to avoid unnecessary production fluctuations and meet the needs of requiring departments at the lowest price);          (2) Purchasing;          (3) Performing or assigning contract administration, including follow-up and expediting of inspection and transportation; and          (4) Obtaining licenses under patents and settling patent infringement claims arising out of the acquisition. (Acquiring departments must obtain approval from the department whose funds are to be charged for obtaining licenses or settling claims.)    **Parent topic:** PGI 208.7002 Assignment authority.
#### § 985.58 Exempt oil.

Oil held by a producer or handler on the effective date of this subpart shall not be regulated under this subpart if reported and identified to the Committee not later than 60 days after that date. Any such oil not reported and identified to the Committee shall be subject to all regulation under this subpart.
EXHIBIT
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I, Leslie
J. Kessler, Chief Executive Officer of Water Chef, Inc., hereby certify that the
Form 10-Q of Water Chef, Inc. for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2008
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in such report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Water Chef, Inc.





Date:  November
      14, 2008
                /s/
      Leslie J. KesslerLeslie
      J. KesslerPresident
      and Chief Executive Officer







This
certification is being furnished pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 and, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, shall
not be deemed to be filed as part of the periodic report described herein nor
shall it be deemed filed by Water Chef, Inc. for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
§ 39.77 Notification of incidents and lost sources; abandonment procedures for irretrievable sources. ( a ) The licensee shall immediately notify the appropriate NRC Regional Office by telephone and subsequently, within 30 days, by confirmation in writing, using an appropriate method listed in § 30.6(a) of this chapter, if the licensee knows or has reason to believe that a sealed source has been ruptured. The written confirmation must designate the well or other location, describe the magnitude and extent of the escape of licensed materials, assess the consequences of the rupture, and explain efforts planned or being taken to mitigate these consequences.
( b ) The licensee shall notify the Commission of the theft or loss of radioactive materials, radiation overexposures, excessive levels and concentrations of radiation, and certain other accidents as required by §§ 20.2201-20.2202, § 20.2203 and § 30.50 of this chapter.
( c ) If a sealed source becomes lodged in a well, and when it becomes apparent that efforts to recover the sealed source will not be successful, the licensee shall— ( 1 ) Notify the appropriate NRC Regional Office by telephone of the circumstances that resulted in the inability to retrieve the source and— ( i ) Obtain NRC approval to implement abandonment procedures; or
( ii ) That the licensee implemented abandonment before receiving NRC approval because the licensee believed there was an immediate threat to public health and safety; and
( 2 ) Advise the well owner or operator, as appropriate, of the abandonment procedures under § 39.15 (a) or (c); and
( 3 ) Either ensure that abandonment procedures are implemented within 30 days after the sealed source has been classified as irretrievable or request an extension of time if unable to complete the abandonment procedures.
( d ) The licensee shall, within 30 days after a sealed source has been classified as irretrievable, make a report in writing to the appropriate NRC Regional Office. The licensee shall send a copy of the report to each appropriate State or Federal agency that issued permits or otherwise approved of the drilling operation. The report must contain the following information: ( 1 ) Date of occurrence;
( 2 ) A description of the irretrievable well logging source involved including the radionuclide and its quantity, chemical, and physical form;
( 3 ) Surface location and identification of the well;
( 4 ) Results of efforts to immobilize and seal the source in place;
( 5 ) A brief description of the attempted recovery effort;
( 6 ) Depth of the source;
( 7 ) Depth of the top of the cement plug;
( 8 ) Depth of the well;
( 9 ) The immediate threat to public health and safety justification for implementing abandonment if prior NRC approval was not obtained in accordance with paragraph (c)(1)(ii) of this section;
( 10 ) Any other information, such as a warning statement, contained on the permanent identification plaque; and
( 11 ) State and Federal agencies receiving copy of this report.
[52 FR 8234, Mar. 17, 1987, as amended at 56 FR 64980, Dec. 13, 1991; 58 FR 67660, Dec. 22, 1993; 65 FR 20345, Apr. 17, 2000; 68 FR 58806, Oct. 10, 2003]
§ 1015.103 Antitrust, fraud, tax, interagency, transportation account audit, acquisition contract, and financial assistance instrument claims excluded. ( a ) The standards in this part relating to compromise, suspension, and termination of collection activity do not apply to any debt based in whole or in part on conduct in violation of the antitrust laws or to any debt involving fraud, the presentation of a false claim, or misrepresentation on the part of the debtor or any party having an interest in the claim. Only the DOJ has the authority to compromise, suspend, or terminate collection activity on such claims. The standards in this part relating to the administrative collection of claims do apply, but only to the extent authorized by the DOJ in a particular case. Upon identification of a claim based in whole or in part on conduct in violation of the antitrust laws or any claim involving fraud, the presentation of a false claim, or misrepresentation on the part of the debtor or any party having an interest in the claim, DOE will promptly refer the case to the DOJ for action. At its discretion, the DOJ may return the claim to DOE for further handling in accordance with the standards in this part.
( b ) Part 1015 does not apply to tax debts.
( c ) Part 1015 does not apply to claims between Federal agencies. Federal agencies should attempt to resolve interagency claims by negotiation in accordance with Executive Order 12146 (3 CFR, 1980 Comp., pp. 409-412).
( d ) Part 1015 does not apply to claims arising from the audit of transportation accounts pursuant to 31 U.S.C. 3726 which shall be determined, collected, compromised, terminated, or settled in accordance with regulations published under the authority of 31 U.S.C. 3726 (*see* 41 CFR parts 101-141, administered by the Director, Office of Transportation Audits, General Services Administration) and are otherwise excepted from these regulations.
( e ) ( 1 ) Part 1015 does not apply to claims arising out of acquisition contracts, subcontracts, and purchase orders which are subject to the Federal Acquisition Regulations System, including the Federal Acquisition Regulation, 48 CFR subpart 32.6, and the Department of Energy Acquisition Regulation, 48 CFR subpart 932.6, and which shall be determined or settled in accordance with those regulations; and
( 2 ) Part 1015 does not apply to claims arising out of financial assistance instruments (*e.g.,* grants, cooperative agreements, and contracts under cooperative agreements) and loans and loan guarantees, which shall be determined or settled in accordance with 10 CFR 600.26 and 10 CFR 600.112(f).
Editorial Note on Part 4
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 4 appear at 77 FR 39904, July 6, 2012.

§ 4.339 Alternate funds disbursal procedure. ( a ) When NRC withholds funds from a recipient under these regulations, the Commission, or designee, may disburse the withheld funds directly to an alternate recipient, any public or nonprofit private organization or agency, or State or political subdivision of the State.
( b ) Any alternative recipient will be required to demonstrate— ( 1 ) The ability to comply with these regulations; and
( 2 ) The ability to achieve the goals of the Federal statute authorizing the Federal financial assistance.
[52 FR 25358, July 7, 1987, as amended at 68 FR 51345, Aug. 26, 2003]
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 245 (Wednesday, December 22, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 80483-80484]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-32070]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. PR10-100-001; Docket No. PR10-68-001; Not Consolidated]


American Midstream (Louisiana Intrastate), LLC; Atmos Energy--
Kentucky/Mid-States Division; Notice of Baseline Filings

December 15, 2010.
    Take notice that on December 10, 2010, and December 13, 2010, 
respectively the applicants listed above submitted a revised baseline 
filing of their Statement of Operating Conditions for services provided 
under Section 311 of the Natural Gas Policy Act of 1978 (``NGPA'').
    Any person desiring to participate in this rate proceeding must 
file a motion to intervene or to protest this filing must file in 
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be considered 
by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be

[[Page 80484]]

taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the 
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of 
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, 
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the date as indicated 
below. Anyone filing an intervention or protest must serve a copy of 
that document on the Applicant. Anyone filing an intervention or 
protest on or before the intervention or protest date need not serve 
motions to intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and 
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an 
original and 7 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal 
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the 
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's 
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' 
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail 
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For 
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#7f393a2d3c30111316111a2c0a0f0f100d0b3f191a0d1c51181009"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="165053445559787a7f787345636666796462567073647538717960">[email protected]</span></a>, or call (866) 208-3676 (toll free). For 
TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, December 22, 2010.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-32070 Filed 12-21-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Land Management

          - [LLMT922200-11-L13100000-FI0000-P;MTM 91627]

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

Per 30 U.S.C. 188(d), Antelope Resources Inc. filed a petition for reinstatement of noncompetitive oil and gas lease MTM 91627, Musselshell County, Montana. The lessee paid the required rental accruing from the date of termination.

                        No leases were issued that affect these lands. The lessee agrees to new lease terms for rentals and royalties of $5 per acre and 16                        2/3                         percent. The lessee paid the $500 administration fee for the reinstatement of the lease and $163 cost for publishing this Notice.                    

The lessee met the requirements for reinstatement of the lease per Sec. 31 (d) and (e) of the Mineral Leasing Act of 1920 (30 U.S.C. 188). We are proposing to reinstate the lease, effective the date of termination subject to:
      - The original terms and conditions of the lease;
      - The increased rental of $5 per acre;
      - The increased royalty of 162/3                         percent; and                    
      - The $163 cost of publishing this Notice.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Teri Bakken, Chief, Fluids Adjudication Section, Bureau of Land Management Montana State Office, 5001 Southgate Drive, Billings, Montana 59101-4669, 406-896-5091.

Teri Bakken,

Chief, Fluids Adjudication Section.

[FR Doc. 2010-30978 Filed 12-8-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4310-DN-P
§ 39.33 Radiation detection instruments. ( a ) The licensee shall keep a calibrated and operable radiation survey instrument capable of detecting beta and gamma radiation at each field station and temporary jobsite to make the radiation surveys required by this part and by part 20 of this chapter. To satisfy this requirement, the radiation survey instrument must be capable of measuring 0.001 mSv (0.1 mrem) per hour through at least 0.5 mSv (50 mrem) per hour.
( b ) The licensee shall have available additional calibrated and operable radiation detection instruments sensitive enough to detect the low radiation and contamination levels that could be encountered if a sealed source ruptured. The licensee may own the instruments or may have a procedure to obtain them quickly from a second party.
( c ) The licensee shall have each radiation survey instrument required under paragraph (a) of this section calibrated— ( 1 ) At intervals not to exceed 6 months and after instrument servicing;
( 2 ) For linear scale instruments, at two points located approximately 1 ⁄ 3 and 2 ⁄ 3 of full-scale on each scale; for logarithmic scale instruments, at midrange of each decade, and at two points of at least one decade; and for digital instruments, at appropriate points; and
( 3 ) So that an accuracy within plus or minus 20 percent of the calibration standard can be demonstrated on each scale.
( d ) The licensee shall retain calibration records for a period of 3 years after the date of calibration for inspection by the Commission.
[52 FR 8234, Mar. 17, 1987, as amended at 63 FR 39483, July 23, 1998]
AIR-13-096-E

January 30, 2013

 

Mr. Keith R. Morgan

Manager, IAE Airworthiness

International Aero Engines AG

400 Main Street M/S 162-24

East Hartford, CT 06108

Dear Mr. Morgan:

This is in response to your November 15th letter sent to the public docket (No. FAA 2002-11488) 

petitioning the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on behalf of International Aero Engines 

AG (IAE) for an extension of Exemption No. 9805 from

§ 21.325(b)(1) Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR). The exemption allows issuance of 

export airworthiness approvals for Class I products (engines) in the United Kingdom and 

Germany. 

On October 6, 2009, the FAA issued Amendment 21-92 (74 FR 53368, October 16, 2009), which 

became effective April 14, 2010. The amendment changed § 21.325(b)(1) to allow the issuance 

of an export airworthiness approval outside of the United States for an aircraft engine, propeller, 

or article provided the FAA finds no undue burden in administering the applicable requirements

of Title 49 U.S.C. and this subchapter. A copy of this rule change is enclosed for your 

information.

As the relief you seek is not required through exemption from 14 CFR § 21.325(b)(1), we will 

take no further action on your petition.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brenda D. Courtney

Manager, Aircraft and Airport Rules Division

Enclosure