1

This section provides that “[n]o action shall be brought with respect to prison conditions under

section 1983 of this title, or any other Federal law, by a prisoner confined in any jail, prison, or other

correctional facility until such administrative remedies as are available are exhausted.” Defendant Marshall

asserts that Plaintiff has failed to pursue the administrative remedies available to him at the Montgomery

County Detention Facility with respect to the claims presented in the instant complaint. (Doc. No. 12 at pgs.

7-8.) 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

 NORTHERN DIVISION

_________________________________

JOHN GREER, #87837 *

Plaintiff, *

 v. * 2:06-CV-783-ID

 

SHERIFF D.T. MARSHALL, et al., *

Defendants. * 

 __________________________________

ORDER

The Magistrate Judge has reviewed the answers, written reports, and supporting

evidentiary materials filed by Defendants (Doc. Nos. 10, 12) and determined that Plaintiff

should file a response addressing each of the arguments and defenses contained in these

reports. In filing his response, Plaintiff shall specifically address Defendant Marshall’s

assertions that (i) he has failed to exhaust available administrative remedies as required by

42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a) of the Prison Litigation Reform Act (“PLRA”),1 see Booth v. Churner,

532 U.S. 731, 741 n.6 (2001) (“Congress has provided in § 1997(e)(a) that an inmate must

exhaust irrespective of the forms of relief sought and offered through administrative

remedies.”); Porter v. Nussle, 534 U.S. 516, 532 (2002) (“[T]he PLRA's exhaustion

Case 2:06-cv-00783-ID-SRW Document 13 Filed 10/24/2006 Page 1 of 4
2

Thus, in preparing a response to the special reports filed by Defendants Plaintiff should refer to

the requirements of Rule 56, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

3

An affidavit is a sworn statement in writing made under oath or on affirmation before a notary

public or other authorized officer. The affidavit must be made on personal knowledge, set forth such

2

requirement applies to all inmate suits about prison life, whether they involve general

circumstances or particular episodes, and whether they allege excessive force or some other

wrong.”), and (ii) the claims contained in the complaint fail to establish a violation of his

constitutional rights. 

Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that on or before November 13, 2006 Plaintiff shall file a response to

Defendants' written reports. If Plaintiff fails to file a response as required by this order,

the court will treat Plaintiff's failure to respond as an abandonment of the claims set

forth in the complaint and as a failure to prosecute this action. Moreover, Plaintiff is

specifically cautioned that if he fails to file a response in compliance with the directives

of this order the undersigned will recommend that this case be dismissed for such

failure. In addition, if Plaintiff fails to respond to the written reports with respect to

each of the claims raised in his complaint, the court will treat this failure as an

abandonment of these claims and shall proceed as justice requires.

As indicated herein, at some time in the future the court may treat Defendants' reports

and Plaintiff's response as dispositive motions and response.2

 Thus, in filing a response to

Defendants' reports Plaintiff should not rely only on his or her unsworn pleadings but should

respond by filing sworn affidavits,3

 or other evidentiary materials developed through

Case 2:06-cv-00783-ID-SRW Document 13 Filed 10/24/2006 Page 2 of 4
facts as would be admissible in evidence, and show affirmatively that the affiant is competent to testify to

the matters stated in the affidavit.

4

If Plaintiff is unable to present, by affidavit, facts essential to justify his opposition to

Defendants' reports, then Plaintiff must file a sworn statement as to why he or she is unable to do so.

3

discovery or other appropriate means and which set forth specific facts demonstrating there

is a genuine issue of material fact for trial in this case. Failure to file sworn affidavits or

other evidentiary materials may result in this court accepting Defendants’ evidence as the

truth.4

 If documents are referred to in the opposing affidavits and have not been previously

filed with the court, sworn or certified copies of those papers must be attached to the

affidavits or served with them. 

The parties are hereby notified that, unless within ten (10) days from the date of this

order a party files a response in opposition which presents sufficient legal cause why such

action should not be undertaken, upon the expiration of the time for Plaintiff to file a

response as allowed by this order, the court may at any time thereafter and without further

notice to the parties (1) treat the special reports and any supporting evidentiary materials as

motions for summary judgment and (2) after considering any response as allowed by this

order, rule on the motions for summary judgment in accordance with the law. 

Failure to follow the requirements of this order about the proper way to respond to

Defendants' reports may result in a recommendation of the Magistrate Judge that final

judgment be entered in favor of Defendants without there being an evidentiary hearing.

DONE, this 24th day of October, 2006.

Case 2:06-cv-00783-ID-SRW Document 13 Filed 10/24/2006 Page 3 of 4
4

/s/ Susan Russ Walker 

SUSAN RUSS WALKER

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00783-ID-SRW Document 13 Filed 10/24/2006 Page 4 of 4