alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 455.71 Eligibility. ( a ) To be eligible to receive financial assistance for an energy conservation measure, including renewable resource measures, an applicant must: ( 1 ) Be a school, hospital, or coordinating agency representing them as defined in § 455.2;
( 2 ) Be located in a State which has an approved State Plan as described in subpart B of this part;
( 3 ) Have completed a technical assistance program consistent with § 455.62, as determined by the State in accordance with the State Plan, for the building for which financial assistance is to be requested subsequent to the most recent construction, reconfiguration, or utilization change to the building which significantly modified energy use within the building;
( 4 ) Have completed an updated technical assistance program if required in the State Plan as specified in § 455.20(q);
( 5 ) Have implemented all energy conservation maintenance and operating procedures which are identified as the result of a technical assistance program or have provided pursuant to the State plan a satisfactory written justification for not implementing any specific maintenance and operating procedures so identified;
( 6 ) Have met any requirements set forth in the State Plan pursuant to § 455.20(m) regarding the avoidance of supplanting other funds in the financing of energy conservation measures under this part;
( 7 ) Have no plan or intention at the time of application to close or otherwise dispose of the building for which financial assistance is to be requested within the simple payback period or useful life (depending on the State's requirement for determining cost effectiveness) of any energy conservation measure recommended for that building; and
( 8 ) Submit an application in accordance with the provisions of this part and the approved State Plan;
( b ) To be eligible for financial assistance: ( 1 ) In States where simple payback has been selected as the cost-effectiveness test pursuant to § 455.20(u)(2), the simple payback period of each energy conservation measure for which financial assistance is requested shall not be less than 2 years nor greater than 10 years, and the estimated useful life of the measure shall be greater than its simple payback period; or
( 2 ) In States where life-cycle costing has been selected as the cost-effectiveness test pursuant to § 455.20(u)(2), the savings-to-investment ratio of each energy conservation measure must be greater than or equal to one under § 455.63(b)(1), over a period for analysis which does not exceed 15 years, and the useful life of the energy conservation measure must be at least 2 years.
( c ) Leased equipment is not eligible for financial assistance under this part. Equipment which becomes the property of the grantee at the conclusion of a long-term purchase agreement without any additional payment is eligible.
## Notice of Receipt of a Clean Air Act Waiver Application to Increase the Allowable Ethanol Content of

Gasoline to 15 Percent
Date EPA Attendees Nam e of Organization Summary of Discussion Did they submit to Docket? Date sent to EPA

01/07/2010 Karl Simon

simon.karl@epa.gov

Robert Anderson anderson.robert@epa.gov

Dave Kortum (by phone) kortum.dave@epa.gov

Antonio Fernand ez (by video) fernandez.fernandez@epa.gov

Paul Machiele (by video) machiele.paul@epa.gov Representatives from the Alliance for a Safe Alternative Fuels Envi ronment (AllSAFE) met with EPA. Attendees in person : Ed Cohen from American Honda, William Guerry from Kelley Dry e & Warren, Roger Gault from the Engine Manufacturers Association, Matthew Dunn from the National Marine Manufacturers Association, and Kris Kiser and James McNew from the Outdoor Power Equipment Institute Attendees on the phone: Pamela Amette from the Motorcycle Industry Council, Erica Barnes from Honda, Alex Kennedy from Polaris, Jean Daunais from BRP, Glen Martin from Artic Cat, and Lindsey Myers from Yamaha. AllSAFE members discussed possible im plications concerning a possible decision concerning Growth Energy’s E15 w aiver request. Specifically, AllSAFE discussed various issues they raised in their public comment (Document ID: EPA

- HQ

- OAR

2 009

- 0211

- 2559), especially those issues related to the misfueling of vehicles or engines in the event of a partial waiver which limited E15 approval for a subset of vehicles or engines. AllSAFE, and many of its constituents, submitted comments to the docke t. 7 /20 /2009
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 242 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                        April 28, 2005.
    Resolved, That the requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII for a two-thirds 
vote to consider a report from the Committee on Rules on the same day it is 
presented to the House is waived with respect to any resolution reported on the 
legislative day of April 28, 2005: (1) providing for consideration or 
disposition of a conference report to accompany the concurrent resolution (H. 
Con. Res. 95) establishing the congressional budget for the United States 
Government for fiscal year 2006, revising appropriate budgetary levels for 
fiscal year 2005, and setting forth appropriate budgetary levels for fiscal 
years 2007 through 2010; or (2) establishing a separate order relating to budget 
enforcement.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
exv10w17






Exhibit 10.17




CHEVRON CORPORATION




NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS’ EQUITY COMPENSATION AND DEFERRAL PLAN



Retainer Stock Option Agreement


Name of Director:



(Please sign below and return this Agreement)



Chevron Corporation has made the following grant to you, subject to the terms of the Chevron
Corporation Non-Employee Directors’ Equity Compensation and Deferral Plan (the “Plan”) and rules
adopted under it. Both documents are incorporated into this Agreement and copies are available to
you on request. By signing this Agreement and accepting this grant, you are agreeing to all the
terms and conditions of the Plan and its rules.





	 	1.	 	Date of Grant:
	 
	 	2.	 	The Exercise Price is $___ per share, which is the Fair Market Value of
the Shares subject to this Retainer Option on the Date of Grant.
	 
	 	3.	 	The number of Shares subject to this Retainer Option is ___ Shares, subject to
adjustment as provided in Section X of the Plan.
	 
	 	4.	 	This Retainer Option is a nonstatutory stock option.
	 
	 	5.	 	This Retainer Option vests as follows: ___ percent on                                          and the
remaining                      percent on the earlier of the last day of the Annual Compensation Cycle to
which the Grant relates or                                         .
	 
	 	6.	 	This Retainer Option becomes exercisable on                                         .
	 
	 	7.	 	This Retainer Option is transferable as provided in Section VI of the Plan and
Section VII of its rules.
	 
	 	8.	 	This Retainer Option will expire ten years from the Date of Grant, or such earlier
date as it expires or is forfeited pursuant to Section III of the rules under the Plan.






IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Chevron Corporation has caused this Agreement to be executed on
its behalf by its duly authorized representative and the Director has executed the same on the
day and year indicated below.



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Date:

	 	 	 	 	 	By:	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 

	 	 
	 	 	 	 

	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Date:

	 	 	 	 	 	By:	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	 

	 	 
	 	 	 	 

Director
	 	 







E-7
EPA Analysis of Rule 1315 Staff Report Table 5 data.

Percentage of Permits with limits below ind

<2 tpy <4 tpy = 4 tpy Total Permits <2 tpy <4 tpy = 4 tpy

VOC 4,583 2,228 2237 9,048 VOC 50.65% 24.62% 24.7NOx 4,218 560 25 4,803 NOx 87.82% 11.66% 0.5SOx 480 99 3 582 SOx 82.47% 17.01% 0.5CO 2,719 219 0 2,938 CO 92.55% 7.45% 0.0PM10 2,163 454 18 2,635 PM10 82.09% 17.23% 0.6

Number of Permits with limits below indicated thresholds:
IV 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 29 

Honoring the United States Army Volunteer Reserve for its dedicated and 

distinguished service to veterans and communities in need in the United 

States. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 4, 2005 

Ms. MILLENDER-MCDONALD submitted the following resolution; which was 

referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

RESOLUTION 

Honoring the United States Army Volunteer Reserve for 

its dedicated and distinguished service to veterans and 

communities in need in the United States. 

Whereas the United States Army Volunteer Reserve 

(USAVR) continues its primary mission of rendering 

final military honors to the families of deceased veterans 

and has to date rendered more than 5,000 final military 

honors services at no cost to the families or taxpayers; 

Whereas the USAVR continues to work with and train other 

military and veterans organizations in rendering final 

military honors; 

Whereas the USAVR is working in conjunction with military 

and civil authorities in the training and preparation for 

their secondary mission of being a force structure multi-
2 

•HRES 29 IH 

plier in civil emergencies and mass casualty situations 

through individual and organizational civic emergency 

management training; 

Whereas the USAVR has provided no-cost wellness care to 

disadvantaged or homeless persons; and 

Whereas the USAVR continues to flourish due to its enlightened leadership and the dedication of its members: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives recog2 nizes and honors the USAVR for its dedicated and distin3 guished service to veterans and communities in need in 

4 the United States. 

Æ
Muta studies for CAS #98-09-9 submitted by Lanxess Corp

David Brooks to: John Schaeffer 02/11/2013 01:34 PM

Cc: Mark Townsend

Hi John,

Data supplied on December 3, 2012 and December 17, 2012 by Lanxess Corporation are 

considered adequate to satisfy the gene mutation (E1) and chromosomal aberrations (E2) test 

requirements promulgated in the final HPV3 test rule. Please see attached file for our complete 

assessment of these studies.

98-09-9_HPV3_DA_FINAL Gene_Mut_Chrom_Ab_02-07-2013.docx

If you need any further clarification, please do not hesitate to contact us.

Dave

David Brooks

Risk Assessment Division (7403M)

High Production Volume Chemical Branch

EPA East Room 6308N

(202) 564-8603
### Wetland management for amphibians in the Willamette Valley

By: M. J. Adams**Christopher A. Pearl**R. Bruce Bury

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/fs20043039

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (356 KB pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
Editorial Note on Part 2
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

§ 2.1109 Requests for oral argument. ( a ) ( 1 ) In its request for hearing/petition to intervene filed in accordance with § 2.309 or in the applicant's or the NRC staff's response to a request for a hearing/petition to intervene, any party may invoke the hybrid hearing procedures in this Subpart by requesting an oral argument. If it is determined that a hearing will be held, the presiding officer shall grant a timely request for oral argument.
( 2 ) The presiding officer may grant an untimely request for oral argument only upon a showing of good cause by the requesting party for failure to file on time and after providing the other parties an opportunity to respond to the untimely request.
( b ) The presiding officer shall issue a written order ruling on any requests for oral argument. If the presiding officer grants a request for oral argument, the order shall include a schedule for discovery and subsequent oral argument with respect to the admitted contentions.
( c ) If no party to the proceeding requests oral argument, or if all untimely requests for oral argument are denied, the presiding officer shall conduct the proceeding in accordance with the subpart under which the proceeding was initially conducted as determined in accordance with § 2.310.
[50 FR 41670, Oct. 15, 1985, as amended at 69 FR 2267, Jan. 14, 2004]
Exhibit 31.1

Certification

I, David J. Hoberman
certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of the American Express Issuance Trust II (the Exchange Act periodic
reports);

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing or other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4. Based
on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing
agreements in all material respects; and

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such
reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I
have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: The Bank of New York Mellon and TransCentra, Inc, (formerly known as Regulus Group LLC).

Date: March 28, 2018



| |  |        |  |                                                                                                                    
| |  | ------ |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | By:    |  | /s/ David J. Hoberman                                                                                              
| |  | Name:  |  | David J. Hoberman                                                                                                  
| |  | Title: |  | President, American Express Receivables
Financing Corporation VIII LLC (Senior officer in charge of securitization)
#### MINICH, Respondent, v. INTERNATIONAL RY. CO., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

July 7, 1914.)

Action by Sadie E. Minich against the International Railway Company.

No opinion. Motion denied, with $10 costs, upon the ground that the motion is prematurely made.
Editorial Note on Part 4
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 4 appear at 77 FR 39904, July 6, 2012.

§ 4.44 Resolution of matters. ( a ) If an investigation pursuant to § 4.43 indicates a failure to comply with this subpart, the responsible NRC official will so inform the recipient and the matter will be resolved by voluntary means whenever possible. If it has been determined that the matter cannot be resolved by voluntary means, action will be taken as provided for in §§ 4.46 through 4.49.
( b ) If an investigation does not warrant action pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section, the responsible NRC official will so inform the recipient and the complainant, if any, in writing.
Exhibit 13.1 Certification of the Principal Executive OfficerPursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 In connection with the annual report of Ambev S.A. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2015, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, or the Report, I, Bernardo Pinto Paiva, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and (2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Date: March 14, 2016. /s/ Bernardo Pinto Paiva Name:    Bernardo Pinto Paiva Title:       Chief Executive Officer  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




---
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsBOREAS TE-9 In Situ Diurnal Gas Exchange of NAS Boreal Forest StandsThe BOREAS TE-9 team collected several data sets related to chemical and photosynthetic properties of leaves in boreal forest tree species. The purpose of the BOREAS TE-09 study was threefold: 1) to provide in situ gas exchange data that will be used to validate models of photosynthetic responses to light, temperature, and carbon dioxide (CO2); 2) to compare the photosynthetic responses of different tree crown levels (upper and lower); and 3) to characterize the diurnal water potential curves for these sites to get an indication of the extent to which soil moisture supply to leaves might be limiting photosynthesis. The gas exchange data of the BOREAS NSA were collected to characterize diurnal gas exchange and water potential of two canopy levels of five boreal canopy cover types: young jack pine, old jack pine, old aspen, lowland old black spruce, and upland black spruce. These data were collected between 27-May-1994 and 17-Sep-1994. The data are provided in tabular ASCII files. The data files are available on a CD-ROM (see document number 20010000884), or from the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) Distributed Active Archive Center (DAAC).Document ID20010004659Acquisition SourceGoddard Space Flight CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsHall, Forrest G.*(NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt, MD United States)*Curd, Shelaine*(Raytheon Information Technology and Scientific Services Greenbelt, MD United States)*Margolis, Hank*(Laval Univ. Sainte-Foye, Quebec Canada)*Coyea, Marie*(Laval Univ. Sainte-Foye, Quebec Canada)*Dang, Qinglai*(Lakehead Univ. Port Arthur, Ontario Canada)*Date AcquiredSeptember 7, 2013Publication DateOctober 1, 2000Subject CategoryEarth Resources And Remote SensingReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.15:209891/VOL153Rept-2000-03136-0/VOL153NASA/TM-2000-209891/VOL153Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 462-33-01Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20010004659.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
§ 36.53 Operating and emergency procedures. ( a ) The licensee shall have and follow written operating procedures for— ( 1 ) Operation of the irradiator, including entering and leaving the radiation room;
( 2 ) Use of personnel dosimeters;
( 3 ) Surveying the shielding of panoramic irradiators;
( 4 ) Monitoring pool water for contamination while the water is in the pool and before release of pool water to unrestricted areas;
( 5 ) Leak testing of sources;
( 6 ) Inspection and maintenance checks required by § 36.61;
( 7 ) Loading, unloading, and repositioning sources, if the operations will be performed by the licensee; and
( 8 ) Inspection of movable shielding required by § 36.23(h), if applicable.
( b ) The licensee shall have and follow emergency or abnormal event procedures, appropriate for the irradiator type, for— ( 1 ) Sources stuck in the unshielded position;
( 2 ) Personnel overexposures;
( 3 ) A radiation alarm from the product exit portal monitor or pool monitor;
( 4 ) Detection of leaking sources, pool contamination, or alarm caused by contamination of pool water;
( 5 ) A low or high water level indicator, an abnormal water loss, or leakage from the source storage pool;
( 6 ) A prolonged loss of electrical power;
( 7 ) A fire alarm or explosion in the radiation room;
( 8 ) An alarm indicating unauthorized entry into the radiation room, area around pool, or another alarmed area;
( 9 ) Natural phenomena, including an earthquake, a tornado, flooding, or other phenomena as appropriate for the geographical location of the facility; and
( 10 ) The jamming of automatic conveyor systems.
( c ) The licensee may revise operating and emergency procedures without Commission approval only if all of the following conditions are met: ( 1 ) The revisions do not reduce the safety of the facility,
( 2 ) The revisions are consistent with the outline or summary of procedures submitted with the license application,
( 3 ) The revisions have been reviewed and approved by the radiation safety officer, and
( 4 ) The users or operators are instructed and tested on the revised procedures before they are put into use.