alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-1695

ROBERT W. HARRIS,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

PATRICK R. DONAHOE, Postmaster General, United States 

Postal Service,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior

District Judge. (3:14-cv-00427-REP)

Submitted: November 24, 2015 Decided: December 22, 2015

Before WILKINSON and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert W. Harris, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth Wu, Assistant 

United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Robert W. Harris appeals the district court’s order 

dismissing this action alleging employment discrimination for 

failure to state a claim, Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). After de 

novo review, see Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555 

(2007), we conclude that dismissal was proper. Even with a 

liberal construction of the complaint, we find that Harris’ 

unintelligible factual allegations were insufficient to give 

rise to an inference of liability and that his claims for relief 

were largely unintelligible. See Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 

662, 679 (2009); Giarrantano v. Johnson, 521 F.3d 298, 302 (4th 

Cir. 2015). We accordingly affirm. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before the court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### § 455.155 Finality of decision.

A decision under § 455.153 shall be final for DOE if there is no review sought under § 455.154. If there is review under § 455.154, the decision thereunder shall be final for DOE, and no appeal shall lie elsewhere in DOE.
Editorial Note on Part 420
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 420 appear at 64 FR 46114, Aug. 24, 1999.

§ 420.5 Reports. ( a ) Each State receiving financial assistance under this part shall submit to the cognizant Regional Office Director a quarterly program performance report and a quarterly financial status report.
( b ) Reports under this section shall contain such information as the Secretary may prescribe in order to monitor effectively the implementation of a State's activities under this part.
( c ) The reports shall be submitted within 30 days following the end of each calendar year quarter.
§ 989.104 Lot. ( a ) *Natural condition raisins* — ( 1 ) *Basic definition.* For the purpose of incoming and outgoing inspection of natural condition raisins, *lot* means, except as otherwise provided in this paragraph, the quantity of such raisins of the same varietal type or of differing varietal types when commingled within their containers (including sweat and picking boxes and bins), which does not exceed a car, truck, or truck-trailer load, and which is submitted for inspection at one time and in the same place.
( 2 ) *Separation of large units.* If a quantity of raisins in excess of a car, truck, or truck-trailer load is submitted for inspection, the total quantity may, at the discretion of the inspector, be separated into such readily identifiable portions, either prior to or in the course of inspection, as can be conveniently and properly inspected, and each such portion shall constitute a lot.
( 3 ) *Resubmission after reconditioning.* Raisins which are submitted for inspection after reconditioning (such as sorting or drying) and whose original lot identity is no longer applicable, shall be a new lot.
( 4 ) *Meeting and failing portions.* Where a portion of a quantity of raisins submitted for inspection meets the minimum grade and condition standards and has been separated from the remainder of the raisins failing to meet such standards: ( i ) The meeting portion shall be one lot; and
( ii ) The remainder shall be one or more lots as necessary to cause each lot to contain either (*a*) a single defect in excess of tolerance or (*b*) two or more of the same defects in excess of tolerance occurring together within each of the individual containers.
( 5 ) *Entire quantity failing.* Where the entire quantity of raisins submitted for inspection fails to meet such standards, then, whether such quantity shall be one or more lots shall be determined in the same manner as for the failing remainder referred to in paragraph (a)(4) of this section.
( 6 ) *Special condition.* Notwithstanding other provisions of this section, any quantity of raisins failing to meet such standards and which are not to be reconditioned may be a single lot.
( b ) *Packed raisins.* For the purpose of outgoing inspection of packed raisins, lot means: ( 1 ) For in-line inspection (i.e., where samples are drawn from a flow of raisins prior to packaging), the aggregate quantity of raisins of the same varietal type, subtype, or size (or in their mixed form), processed in any continuous production of one calendar day and packaged in one size and style of package but excluding those rejected by inspection; and
( 2 ) for floor inspection (i.e., where samples are drawn from containers of raisins), the aggregate quantity of such raisins in like containers but not necessarily processed in one continuous production or during one calendar day, identifiable and offered for inspection as a lot.
Searched for **https://www.ssa.gov/multilanguage/French/10096-FR.pdf**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **https://www.ssa.gov/multilanguage/French/10096-FR.pdf**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.
Exhibit 12.3  Questar Gas Company Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges  3 Months Ended March 31,20112010(dollars in millions)EarningsIncome before income taxes$53.8$53.3Add (deduct):Fixed charges6.87.1Total Earnings$60.6$60.4--Fixed ChargesInterest expense$6.6$6.8Estimate of interest within rental expense0.20.3Total Fixed Charges$6.8$7.1--Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges8.98.5  For purposes of this presentation, earnings represent income before income taxes adjusted for fixed charges. Fixed charges consist of total interest charges (expensed and capitalized), amortization of debt issuance costs and losses from reacquired debt, and the interest portion of rental expense estimated at 50%.
THIS ORDER IS

HEREBY STRICKEN

FROM THE RECORD. 

IT WAS DOCKETED

IN THIS CASE IN

ERROR.

Case 2:06-cv-00767-MEF-SRW Document 4-2 Filed 09/06/2006 Page 1 of 1
ex4q.htm


     

    Exhibit 4(q)



     

     

     

    
      	 	Kathryn
      A. Cassidy 

              Senior
      Vice President and GE Treasurer

              


              General
      Electric Company

              3135
      Easton Turnpike

              Fairfield,
      CT 06828

            


    

     

     

     

    Securities
and Exchange Commission

    100 F
Street, NE

    Washington,
DC 20549

     

    February
19, 2010

     

     

    
      	
              Subject: 

            	
              General
      Electric Company Annual Report on Form 10-K for
      the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 – File No.
      001-00035

            


    

    


     

    Dear
Sirs:

     

    
      Neither
General Electric Company (the “Company”) nor any of its consolidated
subsidiaries has outstanding any instrument with respect to its long-term debt,
other than those filed as an exhibit to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009, under which the total amount of
securities authorized exceeds 10% of the total assets of the registrant and its
subsidiaries on a consolidated basis. In accordance with paragraph (b)(4)(iii)
of Item 601 of Regulation S-K (17 CFR Sec. 229.601), the Company hereby agrees
to furnish to the Securities and Exchange Commission, upon request, a copy of
each instrument that defines the rights of holders of such long term debt not
filed or incorporated by reference as an exhibit to the Company’s Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009.

      


      


      


      Very
truly yours,

      


      GENERAL
ELECTRIC COMPANY

      


      


      


      


      


      
        	
                /s/
      Kathryn A. Cassidy

              	 
      
	
                Kathryn
      A. Cassidy

              	 
      
	
                Senior
      Vice President and GE Treasurer
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

 ____________________________

JOHN STEPHEN COLEMAN, #223 809 *

Petitioner, *

v. * 2:06-CV-669-MEF

GWENDOLYN MOSLEY, WARDEN, et al., *

Respondents. *

 ____________________________

ORDER OR MOTION

Upon consideration of Petitioner’s motion for extension of time, and for good cause,

it is ORDERED that

1. Petitioner’s motion (Doc. No. 17) be and is hereby GRANTED;

2. Petitioner is GRANTED an extension from April 29, 2008 to and including May

9, 2008 to file his objections to the April 16, 2008 Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

DONE, this 28th day of April 2008. 

 /s/ Susan Russ Walker 

SUSAN RUSS WALKER

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00669-MEF-SRW Document 18 Filed 04/28/2008 Page 1 of 1
IV 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 300

Recognizing the South Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company 

on the occasion of its 50th anniversary and saluting the outstanding 

service of the Company to the people of South Carolina. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 26, 2005

Mr. WILSON of South Carolina (for himself, Mr. SPRATT, Mr. CLYBURN, Mr. 

BROWN of South Carolina, Mr. BARRETT of South Carolina, and Mr. 

INGLIS of South Carolina) submitted the following resolution; which was 

referred to the Committee on Financial Services 

RESOLUTION

Recognizing the South Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company on the occasion of its 50th anniversary 

and saluting the outstanding service of the Company 

to the people of South Carolina.

Whereas the South Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance 

Company was organized on December 19, 1955, to provide members of the Farm Bureau Federation with insurance coverage that was difficult to obtain and to assist 

such members with safety programs and loss control 

measures; 

Whereas the South Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance 

Company is the largest domestic property and casualty 

insurer in the State of South Carolina; 
2

•HRES 300 IH 

Whereas the South Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance 

Company has 245 employees and 250 exclusive licensed 

agents throughout South Carolina that offer various insurance and financial services; 

Whereas the South Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance 

Company provides a diverse line of products, including 

auto, homeowners, and other insurance coverage with 

sales exceeding $190,000,000 on more than 344,000 policies; 

Whereas in 1999, after Hurricane Floyd struck the coast of 

South Carolina, 90 percent of reported claims made with 

the South Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance 

Company were settled within one week; and 

Whereas the South Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance 

Company serves families of farmers and non-farmers in 

rural and urban communities and the slogan of the Company is, ‘‘Helping you is what we do best’’: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives recog2 nizes the South Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance 

3 Company on the occasion of its 50th anniversary and sa4 lutes the outstanding service of the Company to the people 

5 of South Carolina.

Æ
# PGI 225.7604 Waivers.

Forward waiver requests to the Office of the Principal Director (Contract Policy) via email to osd.pentagon.ousd-a-s.mbx.asda-dp-c-contractpolicy@mail.mil.          

**Parent topic:**PGI 225.76 -SECONDARY ARAB BOYCOTT OF ISRAEL
#### § 945.24 Selection.

Members and alternates of the committee shall be selected by the Secretary on the basis specified in § 945.23 (b) from nominations made pursuant to § 945.25 or from other eligible persons.

[60 FR 29727, June 5, 1995]
Unassociated Document


    
      EXHIBIT
10.25

      


      Farm-Out
Agreement by and between Thomasson Petroleum Enterprises, Inc. and KY USA
Energy, Inc. dated January 21, 2010
Editorial Note on Part 35
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 35 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

§ 35.2632 Records of teletherapy, remote afterloader, and gamma stereotactic radiosurgery full calibrations. ( a ) A licensee shall maintain a record of the teletherapy unit, remote afterloader unit, and gamma stereotactic radiosurgery unit full calibrations required by §§ 35.632, 35.633, and 35.635 for 3 years.
( b ) The record must include— ( 1 ) The date of the calibration;
( 2 ) The manufacturer's name, model number, and serial number of the teletherapy, remote afterloader, and gamma stereotactic radiosurgery unit(s), the source(s), and the instruments used to calibrate the unit(s);
( 3 ) The results and an assessment of the full calibrations;
( 4 ) The results of the autoradiograph required for low dose-rate remote afterloader units; and
( 5 ) The signature of the authorized medical physicist who performed the full calibration.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 33 (Friday, February 19, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 7540]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-3177]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Earned Income Tax 
Credit Project Committee

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Earned Income 
Tax Credit Project Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy 
Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas and suggestions on improving 
customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be Wednesday, March 24, 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Donna Powers at 1-888-912-1227 or 954-
423-7977.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Earned Income Tax 
Credit Project Committee will be held Wednesday, March 24, 2010, at 1 
p.m. Eastern Time via telephone conference. The public is invited to 
make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due 
to limited conference lines, notification of intent to participate must 
be made with Donna Powers. For more information please contact Ms. 
Powers at 1-888-912-1227 or 954-423-7977, or write TAP Office, 1000 
South Pine Island Road, Suite 340, Plantation, FL 33324, or contact us 
at the Web site: http://www.improveirs.org.
    The agenda will include various IRS issues.

    Dated: February 4, 2010.
Shawn F. Collins,
Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. 2010-3177 Filed 2-18-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
#### LANE, Respondent, v. McFARLAND, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

July 12, 1906.)

Action by Charles F. Lane, as, etc., against George W. McFarland.

No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs.
Exhibit 10.01(s)


 


PARTICIPANT
AWARD AGREEMENT 


 


January 1, 2010


  


  


[Name] 


[Street Address] 


[City, State, Zip Code] 


  


  


Dear [Name]: 


  


Pursuant to the terms and
conditions of the EQT Corporation 2009 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “Plan”)
and the 2010 Executive Performance Incentive Program (the “Program”), effective
January 1, 2010, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of EQT
Corporation (the “Company”) grants you «NumberUnits»
Target Share Units (the “Award”), the value of which is determined
by reference to the Company’s common stock.  The terms and conditions of
the Award, including, without limitation, vesting and distribution, shall be
governed by the provisions of the Program document attached hereto as Exhibit A, provided that the Award is also subject to the
terms and limits included within the Plan. 
The Compensation Committee retains the discretion to distribute the
Award in cash, Company stock or any combination thereof. 


  


The terms contained in
the Plan and Program are hereby incorporated into and made a part of this Participant
Award Agreement, and this Participant Award Agreement shall be governed by and
construed in accordance with the Plan. 
In the event of any actual or alleged conflict between the provisions of
the Plan and the provisions of this Participant Award Agreement, the provisions
of the Plan shall be controlling and determinative.


 


You may access important information about the Company
and the Plan on the Company’s website. 
Copies of the Plan and Plan Prospectus can be found at www.eqt.com,
by clicking on the “Employees” link on the main page and logging onto the
“Employee info” page.  Copies of the
Company’s most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K and Proxy Statement can be
found by clicking on the “Investors” link on the main page and then “SEC
Filings.” Paper copies of such documents are available upon request made to the
Company’s Corporate Secretary.  


 


 


	
    

  	
    

  	
    

  
	
    

  	
  Kimberly L. Sachse

  	
    

  
	
    

  	
  For the
  Compensation

  Committee 

  	
    

  



  


  


The undersigned hereby acknowledges receipt of this Award
granted on the date shown above, the terms of which are subject to the terms
and conditions referenced above, and receipt of a copy of the Program document,
and agrees to be bound by all the provisions hereof and thereof. 


  


  


	
  Signature: 

  	
    

  	
    

  	
  Date: 

  	
    

  	
    

  
	
    

  	
  [Name]
United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois 60604

August 28, 2007

Before

Hon. KENNETH F. RIPPLE, Circuit Judge

Hon. DANIEL A. MANION, Circuit Judge

Hon. DIANE P. WOOD, Circuit Judge

Nos. 05-1442

CHRISTOPHER M. STEVENS, Appeal from the United States District

Court for the Northern District of Indiana,

Petitioner-Appellant, Hammond Division.

v. No. 03 C 5

DANIEL R. MCBRIDE, Superintendent, Allen Sharp, Judge.

 Respondent-Appellee,

O R D E R

Respondent-Appellee filed a petition for rehearing and rehearing en banc on July 2, 2007,

and Petitioner-Appellant filed a petition for rehearing and rehearing en banc on July 27, 2007. 

No judge in regular active service has requested a vote on the petitions for rehearing en banc, and

all members of the original panel have voted to DENY rehearing. Accordingly, 

IT IS ORDERED that the petitions for rehearing and rehearing en banc are DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the opinion released on June 18, 2007, is amended as

follows:

Section III of the original opinion is withdrawn, and is replaced with the following new

section:
Appeal no. 05-1442 Page 2

III

For the foregoing reasons, the judgment of the district court is 

AFFIRMED to the extent that it denies habeas corpus relief with 

respect to Stevens’s conviction, and it is otherwise VACATED. 

The case is REMANDED with instructions to issue a writ of habeas 

corpus that vacates the current sentence of capital punishment. 

The State of Indiana is free to conduct a new death penalty hearing, 

providing that it files appropriate documents seeking such relief

within 120 days of the mandate from this court.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

IN RE: ESTATE OF MARY LOUIS O'BRIEN

PETITION OF: JOHN J. O'BRIEN, III AND

KEVIN J. O'BRIEN :

:

:

:

: No. 71 MAL 2024

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 8th day of July, 2024

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal and

Application for Stay are DENIED

.
Case 1:06-cv-00723-MHT-CSC Document 9 Filed 09/14/2006 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:06-cv-00723-MHT-CSC Document 9 Filed 09/14/2006 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:06-cv-00723-MHT-CSC Document 9 Filed 09/14/2006 Page 3 of 3
Case 1:06-cv-00723-MHT-CSC Document 9-2 Filed 09/14/2006 Page 1 of 15
Case 1:06-cv-00723-MHT-CSC Document 9-2 Filed 09/14/2006 Page 2 of 15
Case 1:06-cv-00723-MHT-CSC Document 9-2 Filed 09/14/2006 Page 3 of 15
Case 1:06-cv-00723-MHT-CSC Document 9-2 Filed 09/14/2006 Page 4 of 15
Case 1:06-cv-00723-MHT-CSC Document 9-2 Filed 09/14/2006 Page 5 of 15
Case 1:06-cv-00723-MHT-CSC Document 9-2 Filed 09/14/2006 Page 6 of 15
Case 1:06-cv-00723-MHT-CSC Document 9-2 Filed 09/14/2006 Page 7 of 15
Case 1:06-cv-00723-MHT-CSC Document 9-2 Filed 09/14/2006 Page 8 of 15
Case 1:06-cv-00723-MHT-CSC Document 9-2 Filed 09/14/2006 Page 9 of 15
Case 1:06-cv-00723-MHT-CSC Document 9-2 Filed 09/14/2006 Page 10 of 15
Case 1:06-cv-00723-MHT-CSC Document 9-2 Filed 09/14/2006 Page 11 of 15
Case 1:06-cv-00723-MHT-CSC Document 9-2 Filed 09/14/2006 Page 12 of 15
Case 1:06-cv-00723-MHT-CSC Document 9-2 Filed 09/14/2006 Page 13 of 15
Case 1:06-cv-00723-MHT-CSC Document 9-2 Filed 09/14/2006 Page 14 of 15
Case 1:06-cv-00723-MHT-CSC Document 9-2 Filed 09/14/2006 Page 15 of 15
PGI SUBPART 3.1 – SAFEGUARDS     **Parent topic:** PGI PART 3 IMPROPER BUSINESS PRACTICES AND PERSONAL CONFLICTS OF INTERESTPGI 3.104-4 Statutory and related prohibitions, restrictions, and         requirements.     (a) Contractor and Agency personnel that require NDAs due to their assigned activities             will provide copies of their NDA to the contracting officer. This copy will become part             of the contract.         (b) Contractor and Agency personnel that frequently participate in activities that             require access to source selection information, CUI, or any other protected information             should sign a blanket NDA at the beginning of the fiscal year that is in effect for that             year. These personnel will provide a copy of their blanket NDA to each contracting             officer that requires their participation/expertise throughout the fiscal year. The             contracting officer will sign the copy and keep for the contract file.
Exhibit 8.1

**MATERIAL SUBSIDIARIES**

Our operations are conducted principally byAmbev, and, in the case of our HILA-Ex, Latin America South and Canadianoperations, by direct and indirect subsidiaries of Ambev.  The following is alist of the significant companies that Ambev controlled, either directly orindirectly, as of December 31, 2013: 

·        The Company, directly and indirectly, owns 100%of the economic and voting interests in Ambev Luxembourg (incorporated inLuxemburg) which owns 100% of Labatt Brewing Co. Ltd. (incorporated inCanada).  These entities explore the production of beer in Canada.

·        The Company owns 100% of the economic and votinginterests in Linthal ROU S.A., which, through its subsidiaries, produces andsells beer and soft drinks in Uruguay and other South American countries.

·        The Company, directly and indirectly, owns 100%of the economic and voting interests in Arosuco Aromas e Sucos Ltda.(incorporated in Brazil), which produces concentrates for our soft drinks andcrowns.  

·        The Company, directly and indirectly, owns 100%of the economic and voting interests in Eagle Distribuidora de Bebidas S.A.(incorporated in Brazil).  

·        The Company, directly and indirectly, owns 100%of the economic and voting interests in Jalua Spain S.L. (incorporated inSpain).  

·        The Company, directly and indirectly, owns 100%of the economic and voting interests in Monthiers S.A. (incorporated inUruguay).  

·        The Company, directly and indirectly, owns 100%of the economic and voting interests in CRBS S.A (incorporated in Brazil),which produces and sells beer and soft drinks in Brazil.
#### VAN TUYL v. ALEXANDER et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

November 27, 1914.)

Action by George C. Van Tuyl, as superintendent, etc., against Annie N. Alexander, as executrix, etc., impleaded.

No opinion. Motion denied, with $10 costs. Order filed. See, also, 149 N. Y. Supp. 1116.