alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

________________________ DIVISION

_________________________________, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CASE NO. __________________

)

_________________________________, )

)

Defendants, )

CONFLICT DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

COMES NOW ___________________, a in the above-captioned

matter, and in accordance with the order of this Court, making the following disclosure

concerning parent companies, subsidiaries, partners, limited liability entity members and

managers, trustees (but not trust beneficiaries), affiliates, or similar entities reportable under

the provisions of the Middle District of Alabama’s General Order No. 3047:

This party is an individual, or

This party is a governmental entity, or

There are no entities to be reported, or

The following entities and their relationship to the party are hereby reported:

Reportable Entity Relationship to Party

________________________________ _________________________________

________________________________ _________________________________

________________________________ _________________________________

________________________________ _________________________________

 

Date (Signature)

 

(Counsel’s Name)

 

Counsel for (print names of all parties)

 

Address, City, State Zip Code

 

Telephone Number

Case 2:06-cv-00767-MEF-SRW Document 82 Filed 06/27/2007 Page 1 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

________________________ DIVISION

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I,____________________________________, do hereby Certify that a true and correct copy

of the foregoing has been furnished by ___________________________(manner of service,

i.e., U.S. Mail, electronic mail, etc.) on this _______day of ____________ 20__, to:

 

 

 

Date Signature

Case 2:06-cv-00767-MEF-SRW Document 82 Filed 06/27/2007 Page 2 of 2
Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed October 

23, 2018.

In The 

Fourteenth Court of Appeals 

NO. 14-18-00642-CV

DEBORAH MOHAMED, Appellant 

V.

SHAFFIN ALI MOHAMED, Appellee 

On Appeal from the 247th District Court 

Harris County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. 2003-39225 

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N 

This is an appeal from a judgment signed June 28, 2018. On October 5, 2018, 

appellant and appellee filed a joint motion to dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. 

P. 42.1. The motion is granted. 

Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed. 

 PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Donovan, Wise, and Jewell.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-11486 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus VINCENT AUBYN DELHALL, also known as Sawyer, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:92-CR-365-D

- - - - - - - - - - November 17, 1997 Before WIENER, BARKSDALE and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Vincent Aubyn Delhall, federal prisoner # 26013-083, appeals the district court’s denial of his motion for leave to file an out-of-time appeal. Delhall did not file a notice of appeal within the 60-day period established in Fed. R. App. P. 4(a) for cases in which the United States is a party. Delhall did not file his motion for leave to file an out-of-time appeal within 30 days after the expiration of the applicable 60-day appeals period as required by Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5). He did not file hisNo. 96-11486 -2- motion for leave to file an out-of-time appeal either within seven days after receiving notice of the entry of the district court’s order or within 180 days of the entry of the district court’s judgment as required by Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). Therefore, the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Delhall’s motion for leave to file an out-of-time appeal.
See Latham v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. , 987 F.2d 1199, 1201 (5th Cir. 1993); In re Jones , 970 F.2d 36, 39 (5th Cir. 1992). Because Delhall did not file a timely notice of appeal and because the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying his motion for leave to file an out-of-time appeal, we lack jurisdiction to review the district court’s denial of Delhall’s 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion for reduction of his sentence. Accordingly, Delhall’s appeal is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. Delhall’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is DENIED as moot.
APPEAL DISMISSED; IFP MOTION DENIED AS MOOT.
Unassociated Document


    Agreement

    
 

    Party A:
Honguan Shoe Co.

    Party B:
Wang Tao

    


    Hereby
Party A actual asset

    


    Both
parties are friendly agreed that regarding party B assets:

    


    
      	
              Fixed
      Asset (vehicles)

            	
              Fixed
      Assets ( Housing)

            	
              Intangible
      Assets

            
	
              1
      Audi Car

            	
              Warehouse
      2nd
      floor

            	
              Land
      (14225 meter square)

            
	
              1
      Hyundai Van

            	
              No.1
      Workshop

            	 
      
	
              1
      Jetta Car

            	
              No.2
      Workshop

            	 
      
	
              1
      Evco Van

            	
              No.3
      Workshop

            	 
      
	 
      	
              Messenger
      Room, Entry

            	 
      
	 
      	
              Showroom

            	 
      
	 
      	
              Male
      dormitory

            	 
      
	 
      	
              Electricity
      Room

            	 
      


    

     

    Fixed
assets (vehicles)

    


    


    While all
the above actually belong to Party A, Party B will transfer all above assets
assets usage rights to Party A accordingly.

    


    Whereas
this agreement, and there will be two copies of it, and each party holds
one.

    


    Party
A:

    Party
B:
Editorial Note on Part 2
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

§ 2.809 Participation by the Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards. ( a ) In its advisory capacity to the Commission, the ACRS may recommend that the Commission initiate rulemaking in a particular area. The Commission will respond to such rulemaking recommendation in writing within 90 days, noting its intent to implement, study, or defer action on the recommendation. In the event the Commission decides not to accept or decides to defer action on the recommendation, it will give its reasons for doing so. Both the ACRS recommendation and the Commission's response will be made available at the NRC Web site, *http://www.nrc.gov ,* following transmittal of the Commission's response to the ACRS.
( b ) When a rule involving nuclear safety matters within the purview of the ACRS is under development by the NRC Staff, the Staff will ensure that the ACRS is given an opportunity to provide advice at appropriate stages and to identify issues to be considered during rulemaking hearings.
[46 FR 22358, Apr. 17, 1981, as amended at 64 FR 48949, Sept. 9, 1999]
#### O’GRADY, Respondent, v. HOWE & ROGERS CO. et al., Appellants.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

November 18, 1914.)

Action by James M. E. O’Grady, as executor, etc., against the Howe & Rogers Company and others.

No opinion. Motion to-add to present calendar denied, without costs.
From: Wade, Dennis@ARB

To: Ungvarsky, John

Cc: Kalandiyur, Nesamani@ARB ; Tasat, Webster@ARB ; Ruiz, Gabe@ARB

Subject: SJV Emission Inventory Comparison - 03302016 edits to EPA.docx

Date: Wednesday, March 30, 2016 10:50:58 AM

Attachments: SJV Emission Inventory Comparison - 03302016 edits to EPA.docx

John,

Attached is the document discussing the changes in the inventories you requested. Please

feel free to call with questions.

Dennis
##### 



Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) UNDER THE EXCHANGE ACT
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of B.H.I.T. Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant is made known to us by others, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Date: May 12, 2006
    By:
    /s/ James Benenson, Jr.James Benenson, Jr.President and Chief Executive Officer
### Biological research on fire in the West

By: Water Resources Division, U.S. Geological Survey

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/fs20053005

#### Links

-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (460 KB pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
Subparts 815.4 - 815.6 [Reserved]

Parent topic: PART 815 - CONTRACTING BY NEGOTIATION
Exhibit 3.14

ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT

OF

FNB CORP.

The undersigned corporation hereby submits these Articles of
Amendment for the purpose of amending its Articles of Incorporation:

1. The name of the corporation is FNB Corp.

2. The text of the amendment to the Articles of Incorporation of the corporation is as follows:

RESOLVED, that the Articles of Incorporation of this corporation hereby are amended by deleting the first sentence of Article IV in its
entirety and inserting therefor a new first sentence to read as follows:

The aggregate number of shares that the corporation shall
have authority to issue is 50,200,000 shares, consisting of 50,000,000 shares of Common Stock, par value $2.50 per share, and 200,000 shares of Preferred Stock, par value $10.00 per share.

3. The amendment was approved by the shareholders of the corporation on March 15, 2006 in the manner required by the North Carolina Business
Corporation Act.

This the 15thday of March, 2006.



FNB CORP.By

/s/ Michael C. MillerMichael C. MillerChairman and President
§ 436.106 Reporting requirements. ( a ) By July 1 of each year each Federal agency shall submit an “Annual Report on Energy Management” based on fiscal year data to the Secretary of DOE. The general operations portion of this report will encompass all agency energy use not reported in the buildings portion and shall include: ( 1 ) A summary evaluation of progress toward the achievement of energy consumption, energy efficiency, and fuel switching goals established by the agency in its plans;
( 2 ) Energy consumption reported by functional categories. Reports must include General Transportation and one or more of the following functional categories: industrial or production, services, operational training and readiness, and other. Agencies may report in subcategories of their own choosing. The following information is to be reported for the usage of each fuel type in physical units for each selected functional category: ( i ) Total energy consumption goal;
( ii ) Total energy consumed;
( iii ) Total energy use avoidance;
( iv ) Variance between actual consumption and consumption goal;
( v ) Cost saved;
( vi ) Status of planned investments, and if different from the investment program upon which existing goals are based, the expected impact on meeting goals; and
( vii ) Summary of any other benefits realized.
( 3 ) The energy efficiencies as calculated in accordance with appendix B of this subpart, or by an equivalent method, for the appropriate functional categories identified in paragraph (a)(2) of this section. The following information is to be reported for the energy efficiency for each fuel type by functional category: ( i ) Energy efficiency goal;
( ii ) Efficiency for the reporting period;
( iii ) Summary of any other benefits realized.
( 4 ) A summary of fuel switching progress including: ( i ) Description and cost of investments in fuel switching;
( ii ) Avoidance in use of oil-based fuels and natural gas;
( iii ) Increased use of solar, wood, gasohol and other renewable energy sources;
( iv ) Increased use of coal and coal derivatives, and
( v ) Use of all other alternative fuels.
( b ) Each agency's annual report shall be developed in accordance with a format to be provided by DOE and will include agency revisions to 10-year plans.
( c ) Agencies whose annual total energy consumption exceeds one hundred billion Btu's, shall, in addition to the annual report required under paragraph (a) of this section, submit quarterly reports of the energy usage information specified in paragraph (a)(2) of this section.
( d ) Agencies who consume energy in operations in foreign countries will include data on foreign operations if foreign consumption is greater than 10% of that consumed by the agency in the United States, its territories and possessions. If an agency's estimated foreign consumption is less than 10% of its total domestic energy use, reporting of foreign consumption is optional. Reports should be annotated if foreign consumption is not included.
[45 FR 44561, July 1, 1980, as amended at 51 FR 4586, Feb. 6, 1986]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) 

 ) 

 V. ) Case No. 1:06-cr-190-DRB 

 ) 

RODNEY S. KEYES ) 

MOTION FOR LEAVE TO DISMISS INFORMATION 

 Comes now the United States of America by and through its Attorney for the Middle 

District of Alabama and moves the Court for leave to dismiss the Information heretofore 

filed in the above styled cause to RODNEY S. KEYES on the following grounds, to wit: 

 In the interest of justice. 

 Respectfully submitted this the 20th day of November, 2006. 

 Respectfully submitted, 

 LEURA GARRETT CANARY 

 UNITED STATES ATTORNEY 

 /s/ Kent B. Brunson 

 KENT B. BRUNSON 

 One Court Street 

 Montgomery, Alabama 

 Phone: (334) 223-7280 

 FAX: (334) 223-7135 

 Kent.brunson@usdoj.gov 

Case 1:06-cr-00190-DRB Document 7 Filed 11/20/2006 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

) 

V. ) Case No. 1:06-cr-190-DRB

)

RODNEY S. KEYES )

O R D E R

 Upon consideration of the Motion for Leave to Dismiss Information heretofore filed in

the above styled cause, and for good cause shown, the Court is of the opinion that the

motion should be and the same hereby is granted. It is, therefore, CONSIDERED,

ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by the Court that said motion be and the same is

hereby granted.

 DONE this ________day of November, 2006.

______________________________________

DELORES R. BOYD

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

DISMISSIAL OF INFORMATION

 Comes now the United States of America with leave of the Court first had and obtained

and dismisses without prejudice the Information heretofore filed in the above styled cause

as to RODNEY S. KEYES. 

 Respectfully submitted,

 LEURA GARRETT CANARY

 UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

 /s/ Kent B. Brunson

 KENT B. BRUNSON

 One Court Street

 Montgomery, Alabama

 Phone: (334) 223-7280

 FAX: (334) 223-7135

 Kent.brunson@usdoj.gov

Case 1:06-cr-00190-DRB Document 7-2 Filed 11/20/2006 Page 1 of 1
PGI 215.402 Pricing policy.       (1) Contracting officers must purchase supplies and services from responsible sources at fair and reasonable prices. The Truthful Cost and Pricing statute (10 U.S.C. chapter 271 and 41 U.S.C. chapter 35) requires offerors to submit certified cost or pricing data if a procurement exceeds the Truthful Cost and Pricing threshold and none of the exceptions to certified cost or pricing data requirements applies. Under the Truthful Cost and Pricing statute, the contracting officer obtains accurate, complete, and current data from offerors to establish a fair and reasonable price (see FAR 15.403). The Truthful Cost and Pricing statute also allows for a price adjustment remedy if it is later found that a contractor did not provide accurate, complete, and current data.          (2) When certified cost or pricing data are not required, and the contracting officer does not have sufficient data to determine price reasonableness, FAR 15.402(a)(2) requires the offeror to provide whatever data the contracting officer needs in order to determine fair and reasonable prices.          (3) Obtaining sufficient data from the offeror is particularly critical in situations where an item is determined to be a commercial product or service in accordance with FAR 2.101and the contract is being awarded on a sole source basis. This includes commercial sales data of products or services sold in similar quantities and, if such data is insufficient, cost data to support the proposed price.          (4) See PGI                 215.404-1              and the Department of Defense Guidebook for Acquiring Commercial Items,                 Part B: Pricing Commercial Items             , for more detailed procedures and guidance on obtaining data needed to determine fair and reasonable prices.    **Parent topic:** PGI 215.4 - CONTRACT PRICING
ex10-27.htm


    
      

    

    Exhibit
10-27

    
      


      


       

       

       

      January 29,
2010

      


       

      
 

      Mr.
Anthony J. Alexander

      President &
Chief Executive Officer

      FirstEnergy
Corp.

      76
S. Main Street

      Akron, Ohio
44308

      


      


      Dear
Tony:

      


      Based on our
discussions and the terms of the employment agreement (“Agreement”) dated
February 26, 2008, please accept this as written notice of our mutual agreement
to the early termination of my employment effective March 31, 2010.

      


      If
the above is agreeable to you, please sign where indicated and return a copy to
me for my records.  If you have any questions, please do not hesitate
to call.

      


      
 

      
        	 
    	
                Sincerely,

              
	 
    	 
    
	 	 
	 	 
	 
    	 
    
	 
    	
                Mr. Richard R.
      Grigg

              


      

      


      


      
        
          	
                  So Agreed: 
      

                	 
    	 


        

         

         

        
          	
                  Date:
#### KENNEDY v. FLYNN et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

December 18, 1914.)

Action by Michael J. Kennedy, as executor, etc., against Patrick H. Flynn and others.

PER CURIAM.

Order reversed, with $10 costs disbursements, granted, with $10 costs. The order cannot be sustained *1092on either ground stated by the Special Term in its opinion, which is incorporated in the order by reference. The record does not disclose inexcusable laches exclusively attributable to the moving parties, their predecessor, or the testator, or that irreparable injury will be suffered by the opposite parties. Either, if not both, of these elements should be present when the court is besought to deny the application of the representatives of a deceased party to continue the prosecution of an action where the cause of action survives. Pringle v. Long Island R. R. Co., 157 N. Y. 100, 103, 51 N. E. 435. This action may properly be terminated by resort to usual procedure: (a) A judgment after a trial of the issues; (b) a judgment upon the dismissal of the complaint for neglect to proceed, if the defendants show themselves entitled to this relief.