alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

 )

 v. ) 1:06-cr-170-WHA - DRB 

 )

ROY DALE WALLACE )

ORDER ON MOTION

Pursuant to the Government’s Amended Motion for Detention Hearing (Doc. 200,

filed October 10, 2006), it is 

ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED now only to the extent that it seeks a

detention hearing. Accordingly, a detention hearing is hereby set at 10:00 a.m. on Friday,

October 13, 2006, in District Courtroom 4A, Frank M. Johnson, Jr. United States

Courthouse Complex, 1 Church Street, Montgomery, Alabama 36104. 

The defendantshall be remanded to the custody of the United States Marshal pending

the hearing. The Clerk shall terminate the original Motion (Doc. 199), as it has been

corrected and supplemented by the amended motion. 

Done this 11 day of October, 2006. th

/s/ Delores R. Boyd

DELORES R. BOYD

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:06-cr-00170-WHA-CSC Document 211 Filed 10/11/2006 Page 1 of 1
§ 429.68 Air cleaners. ( a ) *Sampling plan for selection of units for testing.* ( 1 ) The requirements of § 429.11 are applicable to air cleaners; and
( 2 ) For each basic mode of air cleaners, a sample of sufficient size shall be randomly selected and tested to ensure that— ( i ) Any represented value of annual energy consumption or other measure of energy consumption of a basic mode for which consumers would favor lower values shall be greater than or equal to the higher of: ( A ) The mean of the sample: Where: *x*̄ is the sample mean; *n* is the number of samples; and, *x* *i* is the *i* *th* sample.
Or,
( B ) The upper 95 percent confidence limit (UCL) of the true mean divided by 1.10: Where: *x*̄ is the sample mean; *s* is the sample standard deviation; *n* is the number of samples; and, *t* 0.95 is the t statistic for a 95 percent one-tailed confidence interval with n-1 degrees of freedom (from appendix A).
And
( ii ) Any represented value of the integrated energy factor or other measure of energy consumption of a basic mode for which consumers would favor higher values shall be less than or equal to the high: ( A ) The mean of the sample: Where: *x*̄ is the sample mean; *n* is the number of samples; and, *x* *i* is the *i* *th* sample.
Or,
( B ) The lower 95 percent confidence limit (LCL) of the true mean divided by 0.90: Where: *x*̄ is the sample mean; *s* is the sample standard deviation; *n* is the number of samples; and, *t* 0.95 is the t statistic for a 95 percent one-tailed confidence interval with n-1 degrees of freedom (from appendix A).
And
( 3 ) Any represented value of the pollen, smoke, dust, and PM2.5 clean air delivery rate (CADR) of a basic model must be the mean of the CADR for each tested unit of the basic model. Round the mean clean air delivery rate value to the nearest whole number.
( 4 ) Any represented value of the effective room size, in square feet, of a basic model must be calculated as the product of 1.55 and the represented smoke CADR value of the basic model as determined in paragraph (a)(3) of this section. Round the value of the effective room size, in square feet, to the nearest whole number.
( 5 ) Round the value of the annual energy consumption, in kWh/year, of a basic model to the nearest whole number.
( 6 ) Round the value of the integrated energy factor of a basic model to the nearest 0.1 CADR/W.
( b ) [Reserved]
[88 FR 14043, Mar. 6, 2023]
]
Second Department,

May, 1970

(May 4, 1970)

#### In the Matter of Vincent J. Puglisi, Also Known as Vincenzo Pugliesi, for Admission to the Bar of the State of New York.

Application by Vincent J. Puglisi for reconsideration of his application for admission to the Bar as an attorney and counselor at law. The present application was referred to the Committee on Character and Fitness for the Second, Tenth and Eleventh Judicial Districts for investigation, hearing and report on petitioner’s present character and fitness; and the application was held in abeyance pending such report. The Character Committee has submitted its report to this court, in which it appears that the Committee has unanimously recommended approval of the application. The recommendation and findings of the Character Committee are adopted and the application is granted; petitioner will be admitted to the Bar upon taking the customary oath and complying with all other incidental requisites. Christ, P. J., Rabin, Hopkins, Munder and Martuscello, JJ., concur.
H. Res. 387

In the House of Representatives, U.S., 

July 27, 2005.

Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it 

shall be in order without intervention of any point of order 

to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 3283) to enhance resources to enforce United States trade rights. The bill shall 

be considered as read. The amendment in the nature of a 

substitute printed in the report of the Committee on Rules 

accompanying this resolution shall be considered as adopted. 

The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the 

bill, as amended, to final passage without intervening motion 

except: (1) one hour of debate on the bill, as amended, equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on Ways and Means; and (2) 

one motion to recommit with or without instructions. 

Attest:

Clerk.
###### Editorial Note on Part 4

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 4 appear at 77 FR 39904, July 6, 2012.

#### § 4.511 Notice.

The agency shall make available to employees, applicants, participants, beneficiaries, and other interested persons such information regarding the provisions of this part and its applicability to the programs or activities conducted by the agency, and make such information available to them in such manner as the head of the agency finds necessary to apprise such persons of the protections against discrimination assured them by section 504 and this regulation.
Exhibit No. 32.1   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with this report of Questar Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Ronald W. Jibson, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  QUESTAR CORPORATION   November 4, 2010 /s/Ronald W. Jibson Ronald W. Jibson President and Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 31.2 - CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
               PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a)

I, Rod Lynam, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Gallery of History,
Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the quarter period
covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely
to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting;

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls.



Date: August 11, 2006            /s/  ROD LYNAM
                                 _______________________
                                 Rod Lynam
                                 Chief Financial Office
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 242 (Friday, December 17, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 78966]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-31788]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Del Norte Resource Advisory Committee (RAC)

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Del Norte Resource Advisory Committee (RAC) will meet in 
Crescent City, California. The committee meeting is authorized under 
the Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination (SRS) Act 
(Pub. L. 110-343) and in compliance with the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act.

DATES: The meeting will be held January 11, 2011, from 5 p.m. to 9 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Del Norte County Unified 
School District, Redwood Room, 301 West Washington Boulevard, Crescent 
City, California 95531.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Adam Dellinger, Committee Coordinator, 
Six Rivers National Forest, at (707) 441-3569; e-mail 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#422326272e2e2b2c2527300224316c2427266c3731"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="3455505158585d5a5351467452471a5251501a4147">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The meeting is open to the public. Through 
presentations and/or revised proposals, the public will present 
clarification on previously submitted Title II project proposals to the 
RAC. The RAC will vote on projects to recommend for funding. There will 
also be a public comment opportunity.

    Dated: December 10, 2010.
Tyrone Kelley,
Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 2010-31788 Filed 12-16-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
dep 

west virginia department of environmental protection 

Executive Office 

60 I 571h Street SE 

Charleston, WV .25304 

Mr. Shawn M. Garvin 

Regional Administrator 

U.S. EPA, Region III (3RAOO) 

1650 Arch Street 

Philadelphia, PA 19103-2029 

June 17, 2015 

Earl Ray Tomblin, Governor 

Randy C. Huffman, Cabinet Secretary 

dep.wv.gov 

Re: Revision to the West Virginia State Operating Permits Program Under Title V of the 

Clean Air Act 

Dear Administrator Garvin: 

On behalf of the State of West Virginia, I am herein submitting the final 2015 Legislative 

Rule 45CSR30- Requirements for Operating Permits, effective May 1, 2015, as a revision to the 

State Operating Permits Program under Title V of the Clean Air Act. 

Revisions to the rule implement the provisions of EPA's final rule, Deferral for C02 

Emissions From Bioenergy and Other Biogenic Sources Under the Prevention of Significant 

Deterioration (PSD) and Title V Programs. Another revision implements an increase in Title V 

operating fees from $18/ton to $28/ton to keep the Title V Operating Permit Program solvent in 

accordance with the Clean Air Act. 

Included in this submittal is appropriate documentation which validates that proper state 

and federal administrative procedural rulemaking requirements have been fulfilled. Also 

included with this submittal is an electronic copy on compact disk in searchable PDF format. 

We certify that the enclosed electronic copy contains an exact duplicate of information contained 

in the hardcopy submission. 

West Virginia requests that you incorporate this most recent version of 45CSR30 as a 

revision to West Virginia's Operating Permits Program under Title V of the Clean Air Act 

(approved via direct final rule published on October 3, 2001 at 66 FR 50325). 

Promoting a healthy environment. 
Letter to Mr. Shawn M. Garvin 

Page2 

If you have any questions regarding West Virginia's efforts to keep the Title V Operating 

Permit Program solvent, please feel free to contact Ms. Laura Crowder at (304) 926-0499 

extension 1247, or Mr. Fred Durham at (304) 926-0499 extension 1966. 

RCH/lmj 

Enclosure 

cc: Diana Esher (3APOO) 

Sincerely, 

\::) __ ~~ 

, ~~~-HUffman 

Cabinet Secretary 

William F. Durham, Director, WVDEP
Case 1:06-cv-00723-MHT-CSC Document 34 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:06-cv-00723-MHT-CSC Document 34 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:06-cv-00723-MHT-CSC Document 34 Filed 06/15/2007 Page 3 of 3
### NUMBER 13

- 1 8

- 0 0607

- C R



## COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

– EDINBURG

EX PARTE FABIAN GARCIA

On appeal from the 206th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas

.



## ORDE R TO FILE APPELL EE ’S BRIEF

Before Justices Benavides, Hinojosa , and S i lva Order Per Curiam

Th is cause i s before the Court on appell ee ’ s fifth motion for extension of time to file

the brief

. Appell ee ’s brief was originally due to be filed on June 10, 2020

, and th e Court

previously granted appell ee four extensions for the filing of appell ee ’s brief in this cause.

The Court, having f ully examined and considered appell ee ’ s fifth motion for

extension of time to file the brief and the extensions previously granted in this cause, is of

the opinion exigent circumstances exist, and in the interest of justice, appell ee ’ s fifth2 motion for extension of time to file the brief should be granted. Accordingly, appellee’s

fifth motion for extension of time to file the brief is GRANTED. The Court looks with

disfavor upon the delay caused by counsel ’ s failure to have filed a brief in this matter

.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Honorable Luis A. Gonzalez , counsel for

appell ee , file the appellate brief with this Court on or before March 25 , 202 1

. No further

motions to extend will be entertained.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish. T EX

. R. A PP

. P

. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed on the 17 th day of March , 202 1

.
#### § 205.199H Actions not subject to administrative appeal.

A Notice of Probable Violation, Notice of Proposed Disallowance, Proposed Remedial Order or Interim Remedial Order for Immediate Compliance issued pursuant to this subpart shall not be an action from which there may be an administrative appeal pursuant to subpart H. In addition, a determination by the Office of Hearings and Appeals that a Remedial Order, an Order of Disallowance, or a Remedial Order for Immediate Compliance should not be issued shall not be appealable pursuant to subpart H.
Case 2:06-cr-00192-MEF-CSC Document 37 Filed 04/24/07 Page 1 of 6
Case 2:06-cr-00192-MEF-CSC Document 37 Filed 04/24/07 Page 2 of 6
Case 2:06-cr-00192-MEF-CSC Document 37 Filed 04/24/07 Page 3 of 6
Case 2:06-cr-00192-MEF-CSC Document 37 Filed 04/24/07 Page 4 of 6
Case 2:06-cr-00192-MEF-CSC Document 37 Filed 04/24/07 Page 5 of 6
Case 2:06-cr-00192-MEF-CSC Document 37 Filed 04/24/07 Page 6 of 6
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Deborah G. et al., on Behalf of "Baby Boy” G. Respondents, v John Doe et al., Appellants.

Appeals from (1) an' order of the Family Court, Queens County, dated November 2, 1979, which, *inter alia,*directed that custody of the child in question be awarded to the natural parents and (2) a further order of the same court, dated February 7, 1980, which, *inter alia,*denied appellants’ motion for renewal. Orders affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The consent of the petitioner natural father was required pursuant to the decision of the United States Supreme Court in *Caban v Mohammed*(441 US 380). No consent was sought or obtained and the claim of abandonment is not supported by the record. The natural mother’s consent was tainted by family pressures and, more critically, by the conduct of her attorney. Where counsel undertakes to represent a natural mother, such counsel must be independent and effective. Hopkins, J. P., Damiani, Titone and Mangano, JJ., concur.
§ 429.114 Notice of noncompliance and notice to cease distribution of a basic model. ( a ) In the event that DOE determines a basic model is noncompliant with an applicable energy conservation standard, or if a manufacturer or private labeler determines a basic model to be in noncompliance, DOE may issue a notice of noncompliance determination to the manufacturer or private labeler. This notice of noncompliance determination will notify the manufacturer or private labeler of its obligation to: ( 1 ) Immediately cease distribution in commerce of the basic model;
( 2 ) Give immediate written notification of the determination of noncompliance to all persons to whom the manufacturer has distributed units of the basic model manufactured since the date of the last determination of compliance; and
( 3 ) Provide DOE, within 30 calendar days of the request, records, reports and other documentation pertaining to the acquisition, ordering, storage, shipment, or sale of a basic model determined to be in noncompliance.
( b ) In the event that DOE determines a manufacturer has failed to comply with an applicable certification requirement with respect to a particular basic model, DOE may issue a notice of noncompliance determination to the manufacturer or private labeler. This notice of noncompliance determination will notify the manufacturer or private labeler of its obligation to: ( 1 ) Immediately cease distribution in commerce of the basic model;
( 2 ) Immediately comply with the applicable certification requirement; and/or
( 3 ) Provide DOE within 30 days of the request, records, reports and other documentation pertaining to the acquisition, ordering, storage, shipment, or sale of the basic model.
( c ) If a manufacturer or private labeler fails to comply with the required actions in the notice of noncompliance determination as set forth in paragraphs (a) or (b) of this section, the General Counsel (or delegee) may seek, among other remedies, injunctive action and civil penalties, where appropriate.
( d ) The manufacturer may modify a basic model determined to be noncompliant with an applicable energy conservation standard in such manner as to make it comply with the applicable standard. Such modified basic model shall then be treated as a new basic model and must be certified in accordance with the provisions of this part; except that in addition to satisfying all requirements of this part, any models within the basic model must be assigned new model numbers and the manufacturer shall also maintain, and provide upon request to DOE, records that demonstrate that modifications have been made to all units of the new basic model prior to distribution in commerce.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-7738

DONALD SYLVESTER GROSS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

RICHARD LANHAM, SR.; SEWALL SMITH; EUGENE

NUTH; WILLIAM H. STRONG; LIEUTENANT FAW;

STANLEY AUERBACK, Lieutenant; LIEUTENANT

ROGERS; JESSE THOMPSON; DEBRA WARREN, Dietary

Sergeant; DIETARY SERGEANT FOSTER; DIETARY

SERGEANT GREEN; DIETARY SERGEANT MCCRAY;

DIETARY SERGEANT CARTER; CORRECTIONAL DIETARY

OFFICER JONES; JOHN DOE; JANE DOE, Dietary

Staff in MCAC Dietary Department from March of

1992 to the Present; MARIA MAXIMO,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CA95-684-S)

Submitted: February 27, 1996 Decided: January 14, 1997

Before HALL, WILKINS, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Donald Sylvester Gross, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr.,

Attorney General, Stephanie Judith Lane-Weber, Assistant Attorney

General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
2
3

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Donald Sylvester Gross appeals an order of the district court

granting summary judgment in favor of some defendants and dismissing the complaint with regard to the remaining defendants in Gross'

42 U.S.C. § 1983 suit alleging deliberate indifference to his

serious medical needs. We have considered the record and informal

briefs of the parties, and we affirm the judgment for the reasons

stated by the district court in its memorandum opinion. Gross v.

Lanham, No. 95-684-S (D. Md. Oct. 2, 1995). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION

DONNA DORSEY DAVIS, as an )

individual and derivatively )

upon behalf of I-65 )

PROPERTIES, INC., )

)

Plaintiff, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

v. ) 2:06cv766-MHT

) 

RICHARD M. DORSEY, )

)

Defendant. )

ORDER

 It is ORDERED that plaintiff Donna Dorsey Davis’s

motion in limine (doc. no. 63) and defendant Richard M.

Dorsey’s motions in limine (doc. nos. 66-76) are set for

submission, without oral argument, on July 17, 2007, with

all briefs due by said date.

DONE, this the 10th day of July, 2007.

 /s/ Myron H. Thompson 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00766-MHT-TFM Document 78 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 1 of 1
Case 3:06-cv-00777-MHT-TFM Document 1 Filed 08/29/2006 Page 1 of 12
Case 3:06-cv-00777-MHT-TFM Document 1 Filed 08/29/2006 Page 2 of 12
Case 3:06-cv-00777-MHT-TFM Document 1 Filed 08/29/2006 Page 3 of 12
Case 3:06-cv-00777-MHT-TFM Document 1 Filed 08/29/2006 Page 4 of 12
Case 3:06-cv-00777-MHT-TFM Document 1 Filed 08/29/2006 Page 5 of 12
Case 3:06-cv-00777-MHT-TFM Document 1 Filed 08/29/2006 Page 6 of 12
Case 3:06-cv-00777-MHT-TFM Document 1 Filed 08/29/2006 Page 7 of 12
Case 3:06-cv-00777-MHT-TFM Document 1 Filed 08/29/2006 Page 8 of 12
Case 3:06-cv-00777-MHT-TFM Document 1 Filed 08/29/2006 Page 9 of 12
Case 3:06-cv-00777-MHT-TFM Document 1 Filed 08/29/2006 Page 10 of 12
Case 3:06-cv-00777-MHT-TFM Document 1 Filed 08/29/2006 Page 11 of 12
Case 3:06-cv-00777-MHT-TFM Document 1 Filed 08/29/2006 Page 12 of 12