80044 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 244 / Tuesday, December 21, 2010 / Notices 

(16) What incentives could be 

provided to encourage companies to 

state clear, specific purposes for using 

personal information? 

(17) How should purpose 

specifications be implemented and 

enforced? 

(18) How can purpose specifications 

and use limitations be changed to meet 

changing circumstances? 

(19) Who should be responsible for 

demonstrating that a private sector 

organization’s data use is consistent 

with its obligations? What steps should 

be taken if inconsistencies are found? 

(20) Are technologies available to 

allow consumers to verify that their 

personal information is used in ways 

that are consistent with their 

expectations? 

(21) Are technologies available to help 

companies monitor their data use, to 

support internal accountability 

mechanisms? 

(22) How should performance against 

stated policies and practices be 

assessed? 

(23) What incentives could be 

provided to encourage companies to 

adopt technologies that would facilitate 

audits of information use against the 

company’s stated purposes and use 

limitations? 

(24) Should the FTC be given 

rulemaking authority triggered by 

failure of a multi-stakeholder process to 

produce a voluntary enforceable code 

within a specified time period? 

(25) How can the Commerce 

Department best encourage the 

discussion and development of 

technologies such as ‘‘Do Not Track’’? 

(26) Under what circumstances 

should the PPO recommend to the 

Administration that new policies are 

needed to address failure by a multistakeholder process to produce an 

approved code of conduct? 

(27) How can cooperation be fostered 

between the National Association of 

Attorneys General, or similar entities, 

and the PPO? 

(28) Do FIPPs require further 

regulatory elaboration to enforce, or are 

they sufficient on their own? 

(29) What should be the scope of FTC 

rulemaking authority? 

(30) Should FIPPs be considered an 

independent basis for FTC enforcement, 

or should FTC privacy investigations 

still be conducted under Federal Trade 

Commission Act Section 5 ‘‘unfair and 

deceptive’’ jurisdiction, buttressed by 

the explicit articulation of the FIPPs? 

(31) Should non-governmental 

entities supplement FTC enforcement of 

voluntary codes? 

(32) At what point in the development 

and of a voluntary, enforceable code of 

conduct should the FTC review it for 

approval? Potential options include 

providing an ex ante ‘‘seal of approval,’’ 

delaying approval until the code is in 

use for a specific amount of time, and 

delaying approval until enforcement 

action is taken against the code. 

(33) What steps or conditions are 

necessary to make a company’s 

commitment to follow a code of conduct 

enforceable? 

(34) What factors should breach 

notification be predicated upon (e.g., a 

risk assessment of the potential harm 

from the breach, a specific threshold 

such as number of records, etc.)? 

(35) Are there lessons from sectorspecific privacy laws—their 

development, their contents, or their 

enforcement—that could inform U.S. 

commercial data privacy policy? 

(36) Should a preemption provision of 

national FIPPs-based commercial data 

privacy policy be narrowly tailored to 

apply to specific practices or subject 

matter, leaving states free to regulate 

emerging technologies? Or should 

national policy, in the case of 

legislation, contain a broad preemption 

provision? 

(37) How could a preemption 

provision ensure that federal law is no 

less protective than any existing state 

laws? What are useful criteria for 

comparatively assessing how protective 

different laws are? 

(38) To what extent should state 

Attorneys General be empowered to 

enforce national commercial data 

privacy legislation? 

(39) Should national FIPPs-based 

commercial data privacy legislation 

preempt state unfair and deceptive trade 

practices laws? 

(40) The Task Force seeks case studies 

and statistics that provide evidence of 

concern—or comments explaining why 

concerns are unwarranted—about cloud 

computing data privacy and security in 

the commercial context. We also seek 

data that links any such concerns to 

decisions to adopt, or refrain from 

adopting, cloud computing services. 

(41) The Task Force also seeks input 

on whether the current legal protections 

for transactional information and 

location information raise questions 

about what commercial data privacy 

expectations are reasonable and whether 

additional protections should be 

mandated by law. The Task Force also 

invites comments that discuss whether 

privacy protections for access to 

location information need clarification 

in order to facilitate the development, 

deployment and widespread adoption of 

new location-based services. 

(42) The Task Force seeks information 

from the law enforcement community 

regarding the use of ECPA today and 

how investigations might be affected by 

proposed amendments to ECPA’s 

provisions. 

Dated: December 16, 2010. 

Gary Locke, 

Secretary of Commerce. 

Lawrence E. Strickling, 

Assistant Secretary for Communications and 

Information. 

Francisco J. Sa ́nchez, 

Under Secretary of Commerce for 

International Trade. 

Patrick Gallagher, 

Director, National Institute of Standards and 

Technology. 

[FR Doc. 2010–31971 Filed 12–20–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–60–P 

CORPORATION FOR NATIONAL AND 

COMMUNITY SERVICE 

Notice of Establishment of the White 

House Council for Community 

Solutions 

AGENCY: Corporation for National and 

Community Service (CNCS). 

ACTION: Notice of establishment of the 

White House Council for Community 

Solutions. 

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Federal 

Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 

U.S.C. Appendix 2), the Chief Executive 

Officer, CNCS, announces the 

establishment of the White House 

Council for Community Solutions by 

Presidential Executive Order. The 

Council will focus on highlighting ways 

to enlist more Americans and leaders 

across sectors to help catalyze change in 

communities and have an impact in 

addressing our nation’s important goals 

in education, youth development and 

employment. 

DATES: The White House Council for 

Community Solutions was established 

on December 14, 2010 by Presidential 

Executive Order. 

ADDRESSES: The public is invited to 

submit written statements to the 

Council by electronic mail: Send written 

statements to the Council’s electronic 

mailbox at 

WhiteHouseCouncil@cns.gov. 

The public can follow the Council’s 

work by visiting its Web site: http:// 

www.serve.gov/communitysolutions. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Susannah Washburn, Executive 

Director, White House Council for 

Community Solutions, Corporation for 

National and Community Service, 1201 

New York Avenue, NW., Washington, 

DC 20525, swashburn@cns.gov. 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 244 / Tuesday, December 21, 2010 / Notices 80045 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In 

accordance with Section 10(a) of the 

Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 

U.S.C. App. II, § 10(a), and the 

regulations thereunder, Susannah 

Washburn, Designated Federal Officer of 

the Council, has ordered publication of 

this Establishment Notice that the White 

House Council for Community 

Solutions was established on December 

14, 2010 by Executive Order. 

I. Background and Authority 

The Council is governed by the 

Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 

U.S.C. Appendix 2), which sets forth 

standards for the formation and use of 

advisory committees. The White House 

Council for Community Solutions shall 

advise the President on how to engage 

individuals, academia, non-profits, 

philanthropy and business to support 

innovative community solutions that are 

having a real impact in solving our 

Nation’s pressing social issues relating 

to education, youth development, and 

employment. This new Presidential 

Council enlists leaders from a variety of 

sectors—businesses, non-profit and 

philanthropic organizations, 

universities, and community groups—to 

encourage the growth and maximize the 

impact of innovative, communitydeveloped solutions. 

II. Structure 

The Council shall consist of not more 

than 30 members, including its Chair. 

All Council members shall be appointed 

by the President. Members shall not be 

Federal Government employees. In 

selecting individuals for appointment to 

the Council, appropriate consideration 

will be given to selecting leaders from 

a variety of sectors. The composition of 

the Council will reflect a diverse set of 

perspectives from across the country. 

Each member of the Council will be 

appointed to serve a term of two years. 

The members of the Council will be 

Special Government Employees (SGEs). 

Meetings shall be held approximately 

4 times a year and will be coordinated 

by the Designated Federal Officer or 

designee who shall approve the agenda 

and shall be present at all meetings. A 

vacancy on the Council shall be filled in 

the manner in which the original 

appointment was made and shall be 

subjected to any conditions that applied 

with respect to the original 

appointment. An individual chosen to 

fill a vacancy shall be appointed for the 

remainder of the term of the member 

replaced. The vacancy shall not affect 

the power of the remaining members to 

execute the duties of the Council. 

All members of the White House 

Council for Community Solutions shall 

adhere to the conflict of interest rules 

applicable to Special Government 

Employees as such employees are 

defined in 18 U.S.C. 202(a). These rules 

include relevant provisions in 18 U.S.C. 

related to criminal activity, Standards of 

Ethical Conduct for Employees of the 

Executive Branch (5 CFR part 2635), and 

Executive Order 12674 (as modified by 

Executive Order 12731). Management 

and support services shall be provided 

by the Corporation for National and 

Community Service (CNCS). 

December 14, 2010. 

Susannah Washburn, 

Executive Director. 

[FR Doc. 2010–31965 Filed 12–20–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6050–$$–P 

ELECTION ASSISTANCE COMMISSION 

Federal Advisory Committee Act; 

Board of Advisors Charter Renewal 

AGENCY: Election Assistance 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice of Charter Renewal. 

SUMMARY: In accordance with the 

Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. 

L. 92–463), the purpose of this notice is 

to announce that the Election Assistance 

Commission (EAC) has renewed the 

charter for the Board of Advisors for a 

two-year period through December 14, 

2012. The Board of Advisors is a federal 

advisory committee under the Federal 

Advisory Committee Act. 

DATES: Renewed through December 14, 

2012. 

ADDRESSES: Election Assistance 

Commission, 1201 New York Avenue, 

NW., Suite 300, Washington, DC 20005. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Thomas R. Wilkey, Designated Federal 

Officer, at (202) 566–3100. E-mail: 

boardofadvisors@eac.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Board 

of Advisors is a Federal advisory 

committee created by statute whose 

mission is to advise EAC through review 

of the voluntary voting system 

guidelines (VVSG) described in Title II 

Part 3 of HAVA when EAC proposes 

updates to the VVSG; through review of 

the voluntary guidance described under 

Title III subtitle B of HAVA; and 

through review of the best practices 

recommendations contained in the 

report submitted under Section 242(b) 

of Title II of HAVA. 

Thomas R. Wilkey, 

Executive Director, U.S. Election Assistance 

Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2010–31938 Filed 12–20–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6820–KF–P 

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 

Federal Energy Regulatory 

Commission 

[Docket No. CP11–44–000; Docket No. 

CP11–47–000] 

Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, 

Kinetica Partners, LLC; Notice of 

Application and Petition for 

Declaratory Order 

December 14, 2010. 

Take notice that on December 3, 2010, 

Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company 

(Tennessee), 1001 Louisiana Street, 

Houston, Texas 77002, filed in Docket 

No. CP11–44–000 an application, 

pursuant to section 7(b) of the Natural 

Gas Act (NGA), for permission and 

approval to abandon by sale certain 

natural gas facilities located offshore in 

the Gulf of Mexico and onshore in the 

State of Louisiana (Production Area 

Facilities). Also take notice that on 

December 10, 2010, Kinetica Partners, 

LLC (Kinetica), Lyric Center, 440 

Louisiana St., Suite 425, Houston, Texas 

77002, filed in Docket No. CP11–47– 

000, a petition for a declaratory order 

finding that, upon Kinetica’s acquisition 

from Tennessee, the Production Area 

Facilities will be non-jurisdictional 

gathering facilities pursuant to section 

1(b) of the NGA, all as more fully set 

forth in the applications which are on 

file with the Commission and open to 

public inspection. 

Specifically, Tennessee proposes to 

sell to Kinetica certain pipeline systems 

consisting of approximately 800 miles of 

various diameter pipeline, three 

separation and dehydration facilities, 

and six offshore platforms. Kinetica asks 

that the Commission declare that all of 

the facilities will perform a gathering 

function. However, if the Commission 

determines that all but a small portion 

of the facilities are gathering, Kinetica 

requests that the Commission issue a 

limited jurisdiction certificate to cover 

such interstate transportation as 

Kinetica may perform on the facilities. 

Further, the facilities will be purchased 

at less than net book value. Tennessee 

filed, concurrently with its 

abandonment application in Docket No. 

CP11–44–000, an offer of settlement in 

Docket No. RP11–1597–000 addressing 

rate treatment and rate relief related to 

the proposed abandonment. Tennessee 

states that, because the effectiveness of 

the approval requested in each 

proceeding is precedent on approval in 

the other, it requests that the 

Commission consolidate its review of 

the application and offer of settlement 

for issuance of its findings in a single 

order. Kinetica requests that a single 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES