alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
PGI 239.7603-4 DoD damage assessment activities.       (a)  Prior to initiating damage assessment activities, the contracting officer shall verify that a contract(s) identified in the cyber incident report include(s) the clause at DFARS 252.239-7010.   If the contracting officer determines that a contract identified in the report does not contain the clause, the contracting officer shall notify the requiring activity that damage assessment activities, if required, may be determined to constitute a change to the contract.          (b)  In cases of cyber incidents involving multiple contracts, a single contracting officer will be designated to coordinate with the contractor regarding media submission.          (c)  If the requiring activity requests the contracting officer obtain media, as defined at DFARS 252.239-7010, from the contractor, the contracting officer shall—          (1)  Provide a written request for the media;          (2)  Provide the contractor with the “Instructions for Media Submission” document available at http://www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/dars/pgi/docs/Instructions_for_Submitting_M...; and          (3)  Provide a copy of the request to DC3, electronically via email at dcise@dc3.mil, and the requiring activity.          (d)  If the contracting officer is notified by the requiring activity that media are not required, the contracting officer shall notify the contractor and simultaneously provide a copy of the notice to DC3 and the requiring activity.          (e)  The contracting officer shall document the action taken as required by paragraph (c) or (d) of this section, in the contract file.          (f)  Upon receipt of the contractor media, DC3 will confirm receipt in writing to the contractor and the requesting contracting officer.          (g)  When the requiring activity determines that the damage assessment activities are complete, the requiring activity will provide the contracting officer with a report documenting the findings from the damage assessment activities affecting covered defense information.          (h)  The contracting officer shall include the report documenting the findings in the contract file(s) and provide a copy to the contractor.    **Parent topic:** PGI 239.7603 Procedures.
IV 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 276 

Supporting the goals and ideals of Pancreatic Cancer Awareness Month. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 12, 2005 

Mr. PLATTS submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Government Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Supporting the goals and ideals of Pancreatic Cancer 

Awareness Month. 

Whereas over 31,860 people will be diagnosed with pancreatic 

cancer this year in the United States; 

Whereas the mortality rate for pancreatic cancer is 99 percent, the highest of any cancer; 

Whereas pancreatic cancer is the 4th most common cause of 

cancer death in the United States; 

Whereas there are no early detection methods and minimal 

treatment options for pancreatic cancer; 

Whereas when symptoms of pancreatic cancer generally 

present themselves, it is too late for an optimistic prognosis, and the average survival rate of those diagnosed 

with metastasis disease is only three to six months; 
2 

•HRES 276 IH 

Whereas pancreatic cancer does not discriminate by age, gender, or race, and only four percent of patients survive beyond five years; 

Whereas the Pancreatic Cancer Action Network (PanCAN), 

the first national patient advocacy organization serving 

the pancreatic cancer community, focuses its efforts on 

public policy, research funding, patient services, and public awareness and education related to developing effective treatments and a cure for pancreatic cancer; and 

Whereas the Pancreatic Cancer Action Network has requested that the Congress designate November as Pancreatic Cancer Awareness Month in order to educate 

communities across the Nation about pancreatic cancer 

and the need for research funding, early detection methods, effective treatments, and prevention programs: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives supports 

2 the goals and ideals of Pancreatic Cancer Awareness 

3 Month. 

Æ
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Phyllis Klock, Appellant.

Appeal unanimously dismissed as moot, the sentence having been vacated prior to resentence. (Appeal from judgment of Onondaga County Court convicting defendant of forgery, second degree.) Present — Del Vecchio, J. P., Witmer, Gabrielli and Henry, JJ.
Editorial Note on Part 30
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 30 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

§ 30.19 Self-luminous products containing tritium, krypton-85, or promethium-147. ( a ) Except for persons who manufacture, process, produce, or initially transfer for sale or distribution self-luminous products containing tritium, krypton-85, or promethium-147, and except as provided in paragraph (c) of this section, any person is exempt from the requirements for a license set forth in section 81 of the Act and from the regulations in parts 20 and 30 through 36 and 39 of this chapter to the extent that such person receives, possesses, uses, transfers, owns, or acquires tritium, krypton-85, or promethium-147 in self-luminous products manufactured, processed, produced, or initially transferred in accordance with a specific license issued pursuant to § 32.22 of this chapter, which license authorizes the initial transfer of the product for use under this section.
( b ) Any person who desires to manufacture, process, or produce, or initially transfer for sale or distribution self-luminous products containing tritium, krypton-85, or promethium-147 for use under paragraph (a) of this section, should apply for a license under § 32.22 of this chapter and for a certificate of registration in accordance with § 32.210 of this chapter.
( c ) The exemption in paragraph (a) of this section does not apply to tritium, krypton-85, or promethium-147 used in products primarily for frivolous purposes or in toys or adornments.
[34 FR 9026, June 6, 1969, as amended at 40 FR 8785, Mar. 3, 1975; 43 FR 6921, Feb. 17, 1978; 52 FR 8241, Mar. 17, 1987; 58 FR 7736, Feb. 9, 1993; 77 FR 43689, July 25, 2012]
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) CR. NO. 1:06cr197-MEF

)

RODERICK CHARLES MELVIN )

UNITED STATES’ UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

TO FILE OBJECTION TO RECOMMENDATION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

 Comes now the United States of America, by and through Leura G. Canary, United States

Attorney for the Middle of Alabama, and requests an extension of time in which to file its

objection to the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, and in support of the motion the

United States submits the following: 

1. United States Magistrate Judge Charles S. Coody held an evidentiary hearing on the

defendant’s motion to suppress on October 25, 2006, and issued its Recommendation of the

Magistrate on November 14, 2006. The parties were ordered to file any objections to the

Recommendation on or before November 21, 2006. (Doc. 18).

2. The United States has made an effort to prepare its objection to the Recommendation. 

However, despite due diligence, the United States cannot accurately distinguish the testimony

presented during the evidentiary hearing without the benefit of the transcript. The United States

does not entirely disagree with the facts as presented in the Recommendation of the Magistrate

Judge. On the other hand, the United States believes that there were other statements that should

be considered. In addition, the United States is requesting a de novo review of evidence in order

to decide this matter.

Case 1:06-cr-00197-MEF-CSC Document 19 Filed 11/20/2006 Page 1 of 3
3. The United States has requested a transcript of the proceedings from the Court

Reporter, Jimmy Dickens. 

4. The United States has contacted defense counsel Kevin L. Butler, who states that he

does not object to the United States’ request for additional time in which to file its objection to

the Recommendation.

5. Therefore, the United States requests an extension until December 5, 2006, to file its

objection to the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

Respectfully submitted on this 20 day of November 2006. th

LEURA G. CANARY

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

/s/Tommie Brown Hardwick

TOMMIE BROWN HARDWICK

One Court Square, Suite 201

Montgomery, AL 36104

Phone: (334) 223-7280

Fax: (334) 223-7135

E-mail: tommie.hardwick@usdoj.gov

ASB4152 W86T

Case 1:06-cr-00197-MEF-CSC Document 19 Filed 11/20/2006 Page 2 of 3
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) CR. NO. 1:06cr197-MEF

)

RODERICK CHARLES MELVIN )

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on November 20, 2006, I electronically filed the foregoing with the

Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing to the

following: Kevin L. Butler, Esq.

Respectfully submitted,

/s/Tommie Brown Hardwick

TOMMIE BROWN HARDWICK

One Court Square, Suite 201

Montgomery, AL 36104

Phone: (334)223-7280

Fax: (334)223-7135

E-mail: tommie.hardwick@usdoj.gov

ASB4152 W86T

Case 1:06-cr-00197-MEF-CSC Document 19 Filed 11/20/2006 Page 3 of 3
§ 501.35 Public file. ( a ) *Contents.* The public file shall consist of the rule, order, or petition, with supporting data and supplemental information, and all data and information submitted by interested persons. Materials which are claimed by any party to be exempt from public disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552) shall be excised from the public file provided OFE has made a determination that the material is confidential in accordance with § 501.7(a)(11) of this part.
( b ) *Availability.* The public file shall be available for inspection at room 1E190, 1000 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC. Photocopies may be made available, on request. The charge for such copies shall be made in accordance with a written schedule.
[46 FR 59889, Dec. 7, 1981, as amended at 54 FR 52892, Dec. 22, 1989]
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document




































 



 
 

  Exhibit 10.16    
    


 
    DIRECTORS COMPENSATION SUMMARY SHEET    
    


        Nonemployee directors receive compensation for board service. Payment dates are the last working day of March, June, September, and
December. That compensation includes: 

 






 



			
	Annual Retainer:	 	$51,000
	
Committee Chair Retainers:	
 	
$30,000 annually for lead independent director (i.e., Outside Directors Committee chair)
	

 	
 	
$30,000 annually for Audit Committee chair
	

 	
 	
$20,000 annually for Executive Compensation Committee chair
	

 	
 	
$10,000 annually for Governance and Nominating Committee chair and all other committee chairs
	
Attendance Fees:	
 	
$2,000 for each board meeting (attended in person, conducted by telephone, or written consent in lieu of meeting)
	

 	
 	
$1,000 for each committee meeting (attended in person, conducted by telephone, or written consent in lieu of meeting)
	

 	
 	
Expenses related to attendance
	
Equity Based Compensation Award:	
 	
$75,000 annually




 

 








QuickLinks



Exhibit 10.16


DIRECTORS COMPENSATION SUMMARY SHEET
Case 2:06-cv-00763-WKW-DRB Document 3 Filed 09/01/2006 Page 1 of 1
Case 3:O6-cr-OO21O-l\._F-CSC Document 29 Filed O4/OOO7 Page 2 of 6

AC? 245B (Rev. 06/05) Judgment in Criminal Case

Sheet 2— Imprisonment

Judgment—Page 2 of 6

DEFENDANT MELISSA WARD a/k/a MELISSA FOOTE

CASE NUMBER: 3:06CR210-MEF

:= :: 2

: c

IMPRISONMENT

The defendant is hereby committed to the custody of the United States Bureau of Prisons to be imprisoned for a

total term of:

Fifteen (15) months. Defendant shall stand committed upon release from federal custody, thereby making this

sentence consecutive to any sentence she is now serving in CC-06-467.

XThe court makes the following recommendations to the Bureau of Prisons:

The Court recommends that defendant be designated to a facility where mental health treatment is available and

substance abuse counseling can be evaluated.

X The defendant is remanded to the custody of the United States Marshal.

DThe defendant shall surrender to the United States Marshal for this district:

D at ____________________ 0 a.m. 0 p.m. on

0 as notified by the United States Marshal.

DThe defendant shall surrender for service of sentence at the institution designated by the Bureau of Prisons:

0 before 2 p.m. on

RETURNED AND FILED

0 as notified by the United States Marshal.

0 as notified by the Probation or Pretrial Services Office.

MY 3 0 2008

RETURN

CLERK

I have executed this judgment as follows: U. S. DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE 01ST. OF ALA.

Defendant delivered on to

at_______________________________ , with a certified copy of this judgment.

: DANTDELIVEREDON 5 Z/.o,

SURRENDERED ON

FC TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA

:1 OP BUS SO•

BY:

i4r1iuinate Systems Manager

UNITED STATES MARSHAL

By

DEPUTY UNITED STATES MARSHAL

Case 3:06-cr-00210-MEF-CSC Document 32 Filed 05/30/2008 Page 1 of 1
PART 38 – FEDERAL SUPPLY SCHEDULE

CONTRACTING

SUBPART 38.90 DLA–MANAGED FEDERAL SUPPLY SCHEDULES

38.9000 Scope.

38.9001 General.

38.9002 DLA–Managed Federal Supply Schedules for FedMall.

SUBPART 38.90 DLA–MANAGED FEDERAL SUPPLY

SCHEDULES

(Revised December 8, 2020 through PROCLTR 2021-02)

38.9000 Scope.

This subpart prescribes policy and procedures for awarding and administering DLA-managed

Federal Supply Schedules, including those for placement on FedMall.

38.9001 General.

(a) Under the provisions of the Federal Property and Administrative Services Act of 1949 (40 U.S.C.

486(e)), the Administrator of General Services designates and authorizes the DoD to procure and

supply personal property and non-personal services and perform related functions in support of the

federal civil agencies within the terms of the Agreement between the Department of Defense and the

General Services Administration Governing Supply Management Relationships Under the National

Supply System (

https://dlamil.dps.mil/sites/Acquisition/Shared%20Documents/Forms/AllItems.aspx?RootFolder=%2F

sites%2FAcquisition%2FShared%20Documents%2FJ%2D72%2FPROCLTR%2DFiles&FolderCTID=0

x01200080FADA3E9BBF764593CF2E25DC6FA477 ), dated February 19, 1971, and the 1972

Supplement. Enter your email address to access documents.

(b) In accordance with the 1971 Agreement, both GSA and DoD agreed that “GSA and DSA (Defense

Supply Agency, now DLA) will develop and maintain Federal Supply Schedule type contracts for

Groups, Commodities, or items assigned under terms of this Agreement.”

(c) In establishing and maintaining a uniform federal supply catalog system, GSA and DoD shall

coordinate to avoid unnecessary duplication (40 U.S.C. 506).
38.9002 DLA–Managed Federal Supply Schedules for FedMall.

(a) DCSO contracting officers shall—

(1) Use delegated authority from GSA to establish Federal Supply Schedules in compliance with FAR

Part 38 and the Agreement between the DoD and GSA Governing Supply Management Relationships

Under the National Supply System, dated February 19, 1971.

(2) Consider GSA Acquisition Manual (GSAM) guidelines and GSA contracting practices when

establishing Federal Supply Schedules. Contracting officers may use specific GSA clauses,

procedures, and practices if determined to be in the best interest of the Government.

(3) Determine the prices of fixed-price supplies to be fair and reasonable for the purpose of

establishing the Federal Supply Schedule.

(4) Determine in writing contract termination is appropriate prior to removing a contract from

FedMall.
Q 

### Devany, Dennis 

## (OSn**~rom:** Madeleine [mambrose@charter.net]**·S~nt:,­** .;- Saturday, February 

### 13, 201011:18AM 

## Tc):c,
...Dt!Yany, Dennis (OST) Subject: Cape Air

.

## ~ig~se:~j(VNtltife~~r is necessaryto keep Cape Air as the best choice for connections to Boston. I have traveled to Logan often intl1e past year and found Cape Airto be reliable, friendly, and responsible each time. It did not matterthat Iwas sometimes one of eight passengers or the onlytraveler. The pilot was professional and extremely competent even in very windy conditions and I always felt safe and in good hands. The reasonable price was also a majorconsider when choosing to travel by air to visit family in the Boston area or to make connections to further destinations. Thank you for your consideration ofthis matter. Madeleine Ambrose .

1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR

THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

FARMERS TELECOMMUNICATIONS )

COOPERATIVE, INC., )

 )

Plaintiff, )

 )

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:06CV790-WC

 )

VERIZON BUSINESS NETWORK )

SERVICES INC., et al., )

 )

Defendants. )

ORDER ON MOTION

Upon consideration of Defendant Verizon Business Network Services Inc.'s Motion

to Withdraw Counsel Robert A. Klinck, filed on July 3, 2007, it is 

ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED. Verizon Business Network Services Inc.

will continue to be represented by counsel of record from the law firms of Starnes &

Atchison LLP and Kellogg, Huber, Hansen, Todd, Evans & Figel, P.L.L.C.

DONE this 5th day of July, 2007.

/s/ Wallace Capel, Jr.

WALLACE CAPEL, JR.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00790-WC Document 51 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 1 of 2
2

Case 2:06-cv-00790-WC Document 51 Filed 07/05/2007 Page 2 of 2
§ 474.2 Definitions. For the purposes of this part, the term: *Combined energy consumption value* means the weighted average of the Urban Dynamometer Driving Schedule and the Highway Fuel Economy Driving Schedule energy consumption values (weighted 55/45 percent, respectively), as determined by the Environmental Protection Agency in accordance with 40 CFR parts 86 and 600.
*Electric vehicle* means a vehicle that is powered by an electric motor drawing current from rechargeable storage batteries or other portable electrical energy storage devices, provided that: ( 1 ) Recharge energy must be drawn from a source off the vehicle, such as residential electric service; and
( 2 ) The vehicle must comply with all provisions of the Zero Emission Vehicle definition found in 40 CFR 88.104-94(g).
*Highway Fuel Economy Driving Schedule energy consumption value* means the average number of watt-hours of electrical energy required for an electric vehicle to travel one mile of the Highway Fuel Economy Driving Schedule, as determined by the Environmental Protection Agency.
*Petroleum equivalency factor* means the values specified in § 474.3, paragraphs (b) through (f) of this part, which incorporate the parameters listed in 49 U.S.C. 32904(a)(2)(B) and are used to calculate petroleum-equivalent fuel economy.
*Petroleum-equivalent fuel economy* means the value, expressed in miles per gallon, that is calculated for an electric vehicle in accordance with § 474.3(a) of this part, and reported to the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency for use in determining the vehicle manufacturer's corporate average fuel economy.
*Petroleum-powered accessory* means a vehicle accessory (e.g., a cabin heater, defroster, and/or air conditioner) that: ( 1 ) Uses gasoline or diesel fuel as its primary energy source; and
( 2 ) Meets the requirements for fuel, operation, and emissions in 40 CFR part 88.104-94(g).
*Urban Dynamometer Driving Schedule energy consumption value* means the average number of Watt-hours of electrical energy required for an electric vehicle to travel one mile of the Urban Dynamometer Driving Schedule, as determined by the Environmental Protection Agency.
[65 FR 36991, June 12, 2000, as amended at 89 FR 22059, Mar. 29, 2024]
###### Editorial Note on Part 40

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 40 appear at 79 FR 75740, Dec. 19, 2014.

#### § 40.6 Interpretations.

Except as specifically authorized by the Commission in writing, no interpretation of the meaning of the regulations in this part by any officer or employee of the Commission other than a written interpretation by the General Counsel will be recognized to be binding upon the Commission.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

PATRICIA BURKETT, Administratrix of the )

Estate of JEREMY BURKETT, deceased )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v ) 1: 06-CV-00775-DRB

)

TIMOTHY EUGENE McCRAY and )

S.E. LUMBER COMPANY )

)

Defendants.

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE 

COMES NOW, the undersigned and gives notice to this Honorable Court of

her Appearance for the Defendant, Timothy Eugene McCray in this cause. The

undersigned, Cindy L. Self is with the law firm of LAMAR, MILLER, NORRIS,

HAGGARD & CHRISTIE, P.C.

s/Cindy L. Self 

Cindy L. Self (SEL035)

Attorney for Defendant

OF COUNSEL:

LAMAR, MILLER, NORRIS, HAGGARD & CHRISTIE, P.C.

501 Riverchase Parkway East

Suite 100

Birmingham, Alabama 35244

(205) 326-0000

Case 1:06-cv-00775-TFM Document 35 Filed 12/07/2006 Page 1 of 3
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on December 7, 2006 I electronically filed the foregoing

with the Clerk of Court using CM/ECF which will send notification of such filing to

the following: 

David Jerome Harrison 

PO Box 994 

Geneva, AL 36340 

davidjharrison@centurytel.net

Christoffer Peter Bolvig, III 

Hall Conerly & Bolvig PC 

1400 Financial Center

505 North 20th Street 

Birmingham, AL 35203-2626

peter.bolvig@hallconerly.com

Bill Mudd, Esq. 

505 20 Street North th

Birmingham, AL 35203

billmudd@mhsolaw.com

Randolph H. Phillips, Esq. 

609 Pine Avenue

P.O. Box 2303

Albany, GA 31702

rhplaw@bellsouth.net

David Woodham Rousseau, Esq. 

211 W Adams Street

Dothan, AL 36303-4401

rousseaulaw@graceba.net

Case 1:06-cv-00775-TFM Document 35 Filed 12/07/2006 Page 2 of 3
Tommy Ray Scarbrough, Esq. 

119 S Foster Street

Suite 101

Dothan, AL 36301

trsllc@graceba.net

s/ Cindy L. Self

Of counsel

Case 1:06-cv-00775-TFM Document 35 Filed 12/07/2006 Page 3 of 3
§ 987.52 Exemption. ( a ) The Committee may exempt from regulation, upon written request of any producer or handler, the dates he sells to consumers through roadside stands, local date shops, mail order or specialty outlets, if it determines that the particular request is not likely to materially interfere with the objectives of this part. All dates handled pursuant to exemptions under this section shall be reported to the Committee in such manner and in such form as the Committee may prescribe. The Committee shall issue, with the approval of the Secretary, appropriate rules and regulations establishing the bases on which exemptions may be granted.
( b ) The Committee may, with the approval of the Secretary, recommend that the handling of any date variety be exempted from regulations established pursuant to §§ 987.39 through 987.51 and §§ 987.61 through 987.72.
[27 FR 6818, July 19, 1962, as amended at 77 FR 37765, June 25, 2012]