alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

J.B., a minor child, by and through *

his next friend, ADDIE WARD, on *

Behalf of himself and all others *

similarly situated; *

*

Plaintiff, *

vs. * CASE NO: 2:06cv00755-MHT

* JURY DEMANDED

* CLASS ACTION

WALTER WOOD, in his individual *

capacity, *

*

Defendant. *

MOTION TO FILE PLAINTIFF’S EXHIBITS TO HIS RESPONSE TO

DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT UNDER SEAL

Plaintiff J.B. requests the Court to issue a Protective Order placing under

seal or otherwise prohibiting the disclosure of the Plaintiff’s exhibits filed with his

Motion in Response to Defendant Wood’s Motion for Summary Judgment.

As grounds for his motion, he would state that an Order is necessary to

protect the identity of minor children committed to the Department of Youth

Services.

WHEREFORE, Plaintiff requests the Court to enter an Order sealing these

documents/exhibits from the public.

_/s/Robert D. Drummond, Jr._________

ROBERT D. DRUMMOND, JR. (DRU004)

Attorney for Plaintiff

OF COUNSEL:

323 De La Mare Avenue

Fairhope, Alabama 36532

(251) 990-6249

Case 2:06-cv-00755-MHT-CSC Document 35 Filed 07/09/2007 Page 1 of 3
_/s/Michael J. Crow_______________

MICHAEL J. CROW (CRO039)

Attorney for Plaintiff

OF COUNSEL:

BEASLEY, ALLEN, CROW,

METHVIN, PORTIS & MILES, P.C.

P.O. Box 4160

Montgomery, AL 36103-4160

(334) 269-2343 - Telephone

(334) 954-7555 - Facsimile

Case 2:06-cv-00755-MHT-CSC Document 35 Filed 07/09/2007 Page 2 of 3
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on the 9

th

day of July, 2007, I electronically filed the

foregoing with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system, which will send

notification of such filing to the following:

T. Dudley Perry

P.O. Box 66

Mt. Meigs, AL 36057

Michael Crow

P.O. Box 4160

Montgomery, AL 36103-4160

Robert D. Drummond

Attorney at Law

323 De LaMare

Fairhope, AL 36532

/s/Robert D. Drummond, Jr.______

OF COUNSEL

Case 2:06-cv-00755-MHT-CSC Document 35 Filed 07/09/2007 Page 3 of 3
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000764579
<NAME> CAS MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           2,048,372
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,246,409
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                        892,827
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 4,675,925
<PP&E>                                           3,140,598
<DEPRECIATION>                                     829,527
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   6,989,896
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,069,852
<BONDS>                                                  0
<COMMON>                                            37,387
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,924,221
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     6,989,896
<SALES>                                          5,628,241
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,830,614
<CGS>                                            2,496,648
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,378,185
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   425,810
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 (6,257)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    523,714
<INCOME-TAX>                                       204,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                319,714
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                       319,714
<EPS-BASIC>                                          .03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          .03


</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1


  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of SEDONA Corporation on Form
10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Quarterly Report"), I, Marco A.
Emrich, Chief Executive Officer of SEDONA Corporation certify, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
         (1) The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
         (2) The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
SEDONA Corporation.


Dated: November 14, 2005                  /s/ MARCO A. EMRICH
                                          -------------------------------------
                                          Marco A. Emrich
                                          President and Chief Executive Officer
                                          (Principal Executive Officer)
Exhibit 3.15

ARTICLES OF MERGER

OF

INTEGRITY FINANCIAL CORPORATION

WITH AND INTO

FNB CORP.

FNB Corp. (the
surviving corporation), a corporation organized under the laws of North Carolina, with an address at 101 Sunset Avenue, Asheboro, Randolph County, North Carolina 27203, hereby submits these Articles of Merger for the purpose of merging
Integrity Financial Corporation (the merging corporation), a corporation organized under the laws of North Carolina, into the surviving corporation:



|1. | A Plan of Merger has been duly approved in the manner required by law by each of the corporations participating in the merger.
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | As provided in the Plan of Merger, the name of the surviving corporation shall be changed to FNB United Corp. upon the effectiveness of the merger and Article I of the
Articles of Incorporation of the surviving corporation shall therefore be amended to read as follows:
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The name of the corporation is FNB United Corp.



|3. | The merger will be effective upon filing.
|-- | -----------------------------------------

This the 25th day of April,
2006.



FNB CORP.By

/s/ Michael C. MillerMichael C. Miller, President
161 So.2d 277

#### Frank W. BENNETT d/b/a Frank W. Bennett & Associates v. George BANKS and the Administrator of the Division of Employment Security of the Department of Labor of the State of Louisiana.

No. 47071.

March 11, 1964.

In re: Frank W. Bennett d/b/a Frank W. Bennett & Associates applying for certiorari or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of East Baton Rouge. 158 So.2d 290.

Writ refused. The result is correct.
Case 2:06-cv-00756-MHT-WC Document 21 Filed 11/15/2006 Page 1 of 5
Case 2:06-cv-00756-MHT-WC Document 21 Filed 11/15/2006 Page 2 of 5
Case 2:06-cv-00756-MHT-WC Document 21 Filed 11/15/2006 Page 3 of 5
Case 2:06-cv-00756-MHT-WC Document 21 Filed 11/15/2006 Page 4 of 5
Case 2:06-cv-00756-MHT-WC Document 21 Filed 11/15/2006 Page 5 of 5
Case 2:06-cv-00756-MHT-WC Document 21-2 Filed 11/15/2006 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:06-cv-00756-MHT-WC Document 21-2 Filed 11/15/2006 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION

Required by Rule 13a-14(a)



I, Reginald M. Fountain, Jr., certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Fountain Powerboat Industries, Inc.;



2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.

The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a 15(e) and 15d 15(e)) for the registrant and have:



a.

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b.

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c.

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5.

The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a.

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b.

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                        |  |     |                               | 
|----------------------- |  | --- | ----------------------------- | 
|Date: February 14, 2008 |  | By: | /s/ Reginald M. Fountain, Jr. | 
|                        |  |     | Reginald M. Fountain, Jr.     | 
|                        |  |     | Chief Executive Officer       |
# Subpart 1622.1—Basic Labor Policies

Authority:                                5 U.S.C. 8913; 40 U.S.C. 486(c); 48 CFR 1.301.                                

**Parent topic:**PART 1622—APPLICATION OF LABOR LAWS TO GOVERNMENT ACQUISITIONS

## 1622.103-70 Contract clause.

The clause at 1652.222–70 shall be inserted in all FEHBP contracts.
1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of SLM Student Loan Trust 2013-1 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);
 
 2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
 3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;
 
 4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer and administrator have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreement and administration agreement, as applicable, in all material respects; and
 
 5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K. In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as indenture trustee.
 
  
  
 
 /s/ SOMSAK CHIVAVIBUL
# SUBCHAPTER I—AGENCY SUPPLEMENTARY REGULATIONS    

- PARTS 1872–1899 [RESERVED] 

- PARTS 1872–1899 [RESERVED]
Exhibit32.1

** **

** **

**Certification of CEO and CFO**

**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**

**As Adopted Pursuant to**

**Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

 

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of National Property Investors8 (the "Partnership"), for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),Steven D. Cordes, as the equivalent of the chief executive officer of thePartnership, and Stephen B. Waters, as the equivalent of the chief financialofficer of the Partnership, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that, to the best of his knowledge:

 

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of thePartnership.

 

 

 

Thiscertification is furnished with this Report pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Partnership forpurposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended.
Case 2:06-cv-00767-MEF-SRW Document 14 Filed 09/28/2006 Page 1 of 1
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

ABEL GONZALEZ,

Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-23-00306-CR

Appeal from the

399th Judicial District Court

of Bexar County, Texas

(TC# 2020-CR-11841)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the 

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. This decision shall be certified 

below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 13TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2024.

JEFF ALLEY, Chief Justice 

Before Alley, C.J., Palafox and Soto, JJ.
#### § 205.1 Purpose and scope.

This part establishes the procedures to be utilized and identifies the sanctions that are available in proceedings before the Department of Energy and State Offices, in accordance with parts 209 through 214 of this chapter. Any exception, exemption, appeal, stay, modification, recession, redress or resolution of private grievance sought under the authority of 42 U.S.C. 7194 shall be governed by the procedural rules set forth in 10 CFR part 1003.

[61 FR 35114, July 5, 1996]
227 So.2d 595

#### Mr. and Mrs. William C. HAYWARD, Sr. v. Lawrence J. NOEL, Jr., et al.

No. 50137.

Nov. 12, 1969.

In re: Lawrence J. Noel, Jr., et al. applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of Ascension. 225 So.2d 638.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal we find no error of law in its judgment.
Subpart 837.1 - Service Contracts - General

Parent topic: PART 837 - SERVICE CONTRACTING

837.110-70 VA solicitation provisions and contract clauses.

(a) Contracting officers shall include the clause at 852.237-74, Non-Discrimination in Service

Delivery, in all solicitations and contracts covering services provided to eligible beneficiaries.

(b) The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 852.237-75, Key Personnel, in solicitations and

contracts when the contracting officer will require the contractor to designate contractor key

personnel.
§ 110.103 Acceptance of hearing documents. ( a ) Each document filed or issued must be clearly legible and bear the docket number, license application number, and hearing title.
( b ) Each document shall be filed in one original and signed by the participant or their authorized representative, with their address and date of signature indicated. The signature is a representation that the document is submitted with full authority, the signer knows its contents, and that, to the best of his knowledge, the statements made in it are true.
( c ) Filings submitted using the E-filing system must follow the requirements outlined in 10 CFR 2.304.
( d ) A document not meeting the requirements of this section may be returned with an explanation for nonacceptance and, if so, will not be docketed.
[72 FR 49154, Aug. 28, 2007]
Editorial Note on Part 35
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 35 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

§ 35.2645 Records of periodic spot-checks for gamma stereotactic radiosurgery units. ( a ) A licensee shall retain a record of each spot-check for gamma stereotactic radiosurgery units required by § 35.645 for 3 years.
( b ) The record must include— ( 1 ) The date of the spot-check;
( 2 ) The manufacturer's name, model number, and serial number for the gamma stereotactic radiosurgery unit and the instrument used to measure the output of the unit;
( 3 ) An assessment of timer linearity and accuracy;
( 4 ) The calculated on-off error;
( 5 ) A determination of trunnion centricity;
( 6 ) The difference between the anticipated output and the measured output;
( 7 ) An assessment of source output against computer calculations;
( 8 ) Notations indicating the operability of radiation monitors, helmet microswitches, emergency timing circuits, emergency off buttons, electrical interlocks, source exposure indicator lights, viewing and intercom systems, timer termination, treatment table retraction mechanism, and stereotactic frames and localizing devices (trunnions); and
( 9 ) The name of the individual who performed the periodic spot-check and the signature of the authorized medical physicist who reviewed the record of the spot-check.
( c ) A licensee shall retain a copy of the procedures required by § 35.645(b) until the licensee no longer possesses the gamma stereotactic radiosurgery unit.
Subpart 852.1 - Instructions for Using

Provisions and Clauses

Parent topic: PART 852 - SOLICITATION PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT CLAUSES

852.101-70 Using part 852.

Part 852 prescribes supplemental provisions and clauses to the FAR. Provision and clause

numbering are as prescribed in FAR 52.101 (e.g., supplementary construction clauses under part

836 are numbered 852.236-71, 852.236-72, etc.).

852.102 Incorporating provisions and clauses.

(a) As authorized by FAR 52.102(c), any 48 CFR chapter 8 (VAAR) provision or clause may be

incorporated in a quotation, solicitation, or contract by reference, provided the contracting officer

complies with the requirements stated in FAR 52.102(c)(1), (c)(2), and (c)(3). To ensure compliance

with FAR 52.102(c)

(1) and (c)(2), contracting officers shall insert the provision found at 852.252-70, Solicitation

provisions or clauses incorporated by reference, in full text in a quotation, solicitation, or contract if

the quotation, solicitation, or contract incorporates by reference a FAR or 48 CFR chapter 8 (VAAR)

provision or clause that requires completion by the offeror or prospective contractor and submittal

with the quotation or offer.

(b) For any FAR or 48 CFR chapter 8 (VAAR) provision or clause that requires completion by the

contracting officer, the contracting officer shall, as a minimum, insert the title of the provision or

clause and the paragraph that requires completion in full text in the quotation, solicitation, or

contract. The balance of the provision or clause may be incorporated by reference.

(c) When one or more FAR or 48 CFR chapter 8 (VAAR) provisions, or portions thereof, are

incorporated in a quotation or solicitation by reference, the contracting officer shall insert in the

quotation or solicitation the provision found at FAR 52.252-1, Solicitation Provisions Incorporated by

Reference.

(d) When one or more FAR or 48 CFR chapter 8 (VAAR) clauses, or portions thereof, are

incorporated in a quotation, solicitation, or contract by reference, the contracting officer shall insert

in the quotation, solicitation, or contract the clause found at FAR 52.252-2, Clauses Incorporated by

Reference.

(e) If one or more FAR provisions or clauses, or portions thereof, are incorporated in a quotation,

solicitation, or contract by reference, the contracting officer shall insert in the FAR provision or

clause required by paragraph (c) or (d) of this section the following internet address:

https://www.acquisition.gov/browse/index/far.

(f) If one or more 48 CFR chapter 8 (VAAR) provisions or clauses, or portions thereof, are

incorporated in a quotation, solicitation, or contract by reference, the contracting officer shall insert

in the FAR provision or clause required by paragraph (c) or (d) of this section the following internet
address: https://www.acquisition.gov/vaar.