alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV 

House Calendar No. 58 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 345 

[Report No. 109–159] 

Providing for consideration of motions to suspend the rules, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 29, 2005 

Mr. PUTNAM, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; 

which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of motions to suspend the rules, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Resolved, That it shall be in order at any time on 

2 the legislative day of Thursday, June 30, 2005, for the 

3 Speaker to entertain motions that the House suspend the 

4 rules. The Speaker or his designee shall consult with the 

5 Minority Leader or her designee on the designation of any 

6 matter for consideration pursuant to this resolution. 

7 SEC. 2. Upon the adoption of this resolution it shall 

8 be in order, any rule of the House to the contrary notwith-
2 

HRES 345 RH 

1 standing, to consider concurrent resolutions providing for 

2 adjournment of the House and Senate during the month 

3 of July. 

House Calendar No. 58 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 345 

[Report No. 109–159] 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of motions to suspend 

the rules, and for other purposes. 

JUNE 29, 2005 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Area 5 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Tuesday, March 9, 2010.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Patricia Robb at 1-888-912-1227 or 414-231-2360.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that a meeting of the Area 5 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be held Tuesday, March 9, 2010, at 11 a.m. Central Time via telephone conference. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited conference lines, notification of intent to participate must be made with Patricia Robb. For more information please contact Ms. Robb at 1-888-912-1227 or 414-231-2360, or write TAP Office Stop 1006MIL, 211 West Wisconsin Avenue, Milwaukee, WI 53203-2221, or post comments to the Web site:                     *http://www.improveirs.org.*

The agenda will include various IRS issues.

*Reason for Late Notice:*                     Due to inclement weather and Federal office closings in the District of Columbia, key TAP staff was unavailable to prepare and submit notice in time to meet the 15-day notice requirement. Scheduling conflicts with other meetings prevent rescheduling this meeting.                

Dated: February 4, 2010.

Linda Rivera,

Senior Program Analyst, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.

[FR Doc. 2010-3184 Filed 2-18-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
Case 3:06-cv-00761-CSC Document 5 Filed 08/25/2006 Page 1 of 2
Case 3:06-cv-00761-CSC Document 5 Filed 08/25/2006 Page 2 of 2
Case 3:06-cv-00761-CSC Document 5-4 Filed 08/25/2006 Page 1 of 2
Case 3:06-cv-00761-CSC Document 5-4 Filed 08/25/2006 Page 2 of 2
Case 3:06-cv-00761-CSC Document 5-5 Filed 08/25/2006 Page 1 of 4
Case 3:06-cv-00761-CSC Document 5-5 Filed 08/25/2006 Page 2 of 4
Case 3:06-cv-00761-CSC Document 5-5 Filed 08/25/2006 Page 3 of 4
Case 3:06-cv-00761-CSC Document 5-5 Filed 08/25/2006 Page 4 of 4
Case 3:06-cv-00761-CSC Document 5-6 Filed 08/25/2006 Page 1 of 1
Case 3:06-cv-00761-CSC Document 5-7 Filed 08/25/2006 Page 1 of 1
Case 3:06-cv-00761-CSC Document 5-8 Filed 08/25/2006 Page 1 of 1
Case 3:06-cv-00761-CSC Document 5-9 Filed 08/25/2006 Page 1 of 2
Case 3:06-cv-00761-CSC Document 5-9 Filed 08/25/2006 Page 2 of 2
Case 3:06-cv-00761-CSC Document 5-10 Filed 08/25/2006 Page 1 of 1
Case 3:06-cv-00761-CSC Document 5-11 Filed 08/25/2006 Page 1 of 1
Case 3:06-cv-00761-CSC Document 5-12 Filed 08/25/2006 Page 1 of 1
Case 3:06-cv-00761-CSC Document 5-13 Filed 08/25/2006 Page 1 of 1
2402.000 Scope of part.       This part contains definitions of terms used generally throughout the HUDAR, in addition to those set forth in FAR part 2. Additional definitions will be found in individual subparts of the FAR and HUDAR covering terms used in those subparts only.    **Parent topic:** PART 2402 - DEFINITIONS OF WORDS AND TERMS
PGI 225.504 Evaluation examples.

The following examples illustrate the evaluation procedures in DFARS 225.502(c)(ii). The examples

assume that the contracting officer has eliminated all offers that are unacceptable for reasons other

than price or a trade agreement and that price is the determining factor in contract award. The

same evaluation procedures and the 50 percent evaluation factor apply regardless of whether the

acquisition is subject to the Buy American Act (BAA) or the Balance of Payments Program (BOPP).

(1) Example 1.

Offer A $945,000 Foreign offer subject to BAA/BOPP

Offer B $950,000 Foreign offer exempt from BAA/BOPP

Since no domestic offers are received, do not apply the evaluation factor. Award on Offer A.

(2) Example 2.

Offer A $950,000 Domestic offer

Offer B $890,000 Foreign offer exempt from BAA/BOPP

Offer C $880,000 Foreign offer subject to BAA/BOPP

Since the exempt foreign offer is lower than the domestic offer, do not apply the evaluation factor.

Award on Offer C.

(3) Example 3.

Offer A $9,100 Foreign offer exempt from BAA/BOPP

Offer B $8,900 Domestic offer

Offer C $6,000 Foreign offer subject to BAA/BOPP

Since the domestic offer is lower than the exempt foreign offer, apply the 50 percent evaluation

factor to Offer C. This results in an evaluated price of $9,000 for Offer C. Award on Offer B.

(4) Example 4.

Offer A $910,000 Foreign offer exempt from BAA/BOPP

Offer B $890,000 Domestic offer

Offer C $590,000 Foreign offer subject to BAA/BOPP

Since the domestic offer is lower than the exempt foreign offer, apply the 50 percent evaluation

factor to Offer C. This results in an evaluated price of $885,000 for Offer C. Award on Offer C.

(5) Example 5.

Offer A $900,000 Foreign offer exempt from BAA/BOPP
Offer B $850,000 Domestic offer (complies with the required domestic content)

Offer C $550,000 Foreign offer subject to BAA/BOPP (exceeds the required domestic content)

Since the domestic offer complies with the required domestic content and is lower than the exempt

foreign offer, apply the 50 percent evaluation factor to Offer C. This results in an evaluated price of

$825,000 for Offer C. Award on Offer C.

Parent topic: PGI 225.5 -EVALUATING FOREIGN OFFERS-SUPPLY CONTRACTS
PGI 225.870-7 Acceptance of Canadian supplies.       (1) For contracts placed in Canada, either with the Canadian Commercial Corporation or directly with Canadian suppliers, the Department of National Defence (Canada) will perform any necessary contract quality assurance and/or acceptance, as applicable.          (2) Signature by the Department of National Defence (Canada) quality assurance representative on the DoD inspection and acceptance form is satisfactory evidence of acceptance for payment purposes.    **Parent topic:** PGI 225.870 Contracting with Canadian contractors.
Case 3:06-cv-00744-SRW Document 7 Filed 11/06/2006 Page 1 of 1
Case 2:06-cr-00205-WHA-CSC Document 22 Filed 09/25/2006 Page 1 of 1
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen,

 Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 

August 19, 2016

Order 

Clerk

August 19, 2016

154172

LORI CICHEWICZ,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

SC: 154172

v COA: 312806

Oakland CC: 2011-120900-NH

MICHAEL S. SALESIN and MICHAEL S.

SALESIN, M.D., P.L.C.,

Defendants-Appellants,

and

WALNUT LAKE OB/GYN, P.L.L.C.,

Defendant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the application for leave to appeal is 

ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSED because it was filed under the incorrect Court of 

Appeals docket number. The Clerk’s Office has re-docketed this application for leave to 

appeal as Supreme Court docket number 154290, arising out of Court of Appeals docket 

number 330301.
176200.1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

FARMERS TELECOMMUNICATIONS )

COOPERATIVE, INC., )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:06-cv-00790-WC

)

VERIZON BUSINESS NETWORK )

SERVICES INC. and QWEST )

COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION, )

)

Defendants. )

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

Please enter the appearance of Robin G. Laurie, Balch & Bingham LLP, 105 Tallapoosa 

Street, Suite 200, P. O. Box 78, Montgomery, Alabama 36101, as counsel of record for 

Defendant Qwest Communications Corporation in the above-entitled action. The Court and 

opposing counsel are requested to include Robin G. Laurie in service and distribution of all 

pleadings, motions and orders filed or entered herein.

Respectfully submitted on this 26th day of January, 2007.

/s Robin G. Laurie

Robin G. Laurie (ASB-4217-U64R)

One of the Attorneys for Defendant Qwest 

Communications Corporation

Balch & Bingham LLP

105 Tallapoosa Street, Suite 200

Montgomery, Alabama 36101

Telephone: (334) 834-6500

Fax: (334) 269-3115

Email: rlaurie@balch.com

Case 2:06-cv-00790-WC Document 16 Filed 01/26/2007 Page 1 of 3
176200.1 2

Leigh Anne Hodge (ASB-1008-E49L)

Balch & Bingham LLP

1710 Sixth Avenue North

Birmingham, Alabama 35203-2015

Telephone: (205) 226-8724

Fax: (205) 488-5698

Email: lhodge@balch.com

Case 2:06-cv-00790-WC Document 16 Filed 01/26/2007 Page 2 of 3
176200.1 3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on this 26th day of January, 2007, I electronically filed the foregoing 

with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing 

to the following:

Jonathan M. Hooks (HOO032)

Mark D. Wilkerson (WIL072)

Dana H. Billingsley (BIL012)

Wilkerson & Bryan, P.C.

P. O. Box 830

405 South Hull Street

Montgomery, Alabama 36101-0830

Telephone: (334) 265-1500

Fax: (334) 265-0319

mark@wilkersonbryan.com

dana@wilkersonbryan.com

jonathan@wilkersonbryan.com

Patrick H. Tate (TAT006)

P. O. Box 680593

Fort Payne, Alabama 35968

Telephone: (256) 845-1047

Fax: (256) 845-1094

phtate@farmerstel.com

Bryan O. Balough (BAL026)

Starnes & Atchison

P. O. Box 598512

Birmingham, Alabama 35259-8512

Telephone: (205) 868-6000

Fax : (205) 868-6099

bob@starneslaw.com

/s Robin G. Laurie

Robin G. Laurie (ASB-4217-U64R)

One of the Attorneys for Defendant Qwest 

Communications Corporation

Balch & Bingham LLP

105 Tallapoosa Street

Suite 200

Montgomery, Alabama 36101

Telephone: (334) 834-6500

Fax: (334) 269-3115

Email: rlaurie@balch.com

Case 2:06-cv-00790-WC Document 16 Filed 01/26/2007 Page 3 of 3
Sanitized – Attachment 012 

Page 1 of 6
Sanitized – Attachment 012 

Page 2 of 6
Sanitized – Attachment 012 

Page 3 of 6
Sanitized – Attachment 012 

Page 4 of 6
Sanitized – Attachment 012 

Page 5 of 6
Sanitized – Attachment 012 

Page 6 of 6
226 So.2d 523

#### Joseph MONCERET v. J. Thomas JEWELL.

No. 49951.

Oct. 1, 1969.

In re: Joseph Monceret applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of Pointe Coupee. 222 So.2d 336.

Writ denied. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal, we find no error in the judgment complained of.
H. Res. 10

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

January 4, 2005.

Resolved,

SECTION 1. INTERIM EXPENSES OF THE COMMITTEE ON HOMELAND SECURITY.

For interim expenses of the Committee on Homeland Security, there shall be paid out of the applicable accounts of

the House of Representatives not more than $1,396,480.26.

SEC. 2. LIMITATION.

Amounts shall be available under this resolution for expenses incurred during the period beginning at noon on January 3, 2005, and ending at midnight on March 31, 2005,

except that the amount available during any month may not

exceed $465,493.42.

SEC. 3. VOUCHERS.

Payments under this resolution shall be made on vouchers authorized by the Committee on Homeland Security,

signed by the chairman of such Committee, and approved in

the manner directed by the Committee on House Administration.
2

•HRES 10 EH

SEC. 4. REGULATIONS.

Amounts made available under this resolution shall be

expended in accordance with regulations prescribed by the

Committee on House Administration.

Attest:

Clerk.
Subpart 2807.1 - Acquisition Plans

Parent topic: PART 2807 - ACQUISITION PLANNING

2807.103 Agency-head responsibilities.

(a) The HCA is the agency head's designee for the purposes of FAR 7.103.

(b) The CAO may establish acquisition planning criteria and dollar approval thresholds for those

bureaus that:

(1) Fail to allow ample time for conducting competitive acquisitions;

(2) Develop a pattern of awarding urgent requirements that generally restrict competition;

(3) Fail to identify identical or like requirements that, where appropriate, can be combined under

one solicitation, and thereby miss opportunities to obtain lower costs through volume purchasing,

reduced administrative costs in processing one contract action versus multiple actions, and

standardizing goods and services.

2807.104 General procedures.

2807.104-70 Bundled requirements.

In the case of bundled requirements, as defined in FAR 7.104(d)(2) and 7.107, the contracting officer

shall consult with the bureau Small Business Technical Advisor (SBTA). After receiving concurrence

from the bureau SBTA, the contracting officer will provide a copy of the proposed acquisition

package to the Small Business Administration (SBA) Procurement Center Representative (PCR) and

a copy to the DOJ Director, Office of Small Disadvantaged Business Unit (OSDBU), at least 30 days

prior to the solicitation issuance. The SBA PCR is required to make any alternative recommendations

to the contracting officer within 15 days after receipt of the package. If the SBA does not respond in

this timeframe, the contracting officer may proceed as planned with the procurement.
Exhibit 35.2

SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2013-1 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 (the Report), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Santander Consumer International Puerto Rico LLC (the Subservicer), does
hereby certify and represent that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities and performance of the Subservicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of January 16, 2013, among Santander Drive Auto Receivables LLC, Santander Consumer USA Inc., Santander
Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2013-1 and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas (the Agreement) during the period that is the subject of the Report has been made under my supervision.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Subservicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the period that is the subject of the Report.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



SANTANDER CONSUMER INTERNATIONAL
PUERTO RICO LLCBy:

/s/ Troy MillerName:

Troy MillerTitle:

PresidentDate:

March 30, 2017
Editorial Note on Part 4
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 4 appear at 77 FR 39904, July 6, 2012.

§ 4.1 Purpose and scope. The regulations in this part implement: ( a ) The provisions of title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Pub. L. 88-352; (78 Stat. 241; 42 U.S.C. 2000a note), and title IV of the Energy Reorganization Act of 1974, Pub. L. 93-438, (88 Stat. 1233; 42 U.S.C. 5801 note), which relate to nondiscrimination with respect to race, color, national origin or sex in any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance from NRC;
( b ) The provisions of section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, Pub. L. 93-112 (87 Stat. 355; 29 U.S.C. 701 note), Pub. L. 95-602 (92 Stat. 2955; 29 U.S.C. 701 note), which relates to nondiscrimination with respect to the disabled in any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance; and
( c ) The provisions of the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, as amended Pub. L. 94-135 (89 Stat. 713; 42 U.S.C. 3001 note), Pub. L. 95-478 (92 Stat. 1513; 42 U.S.C. 3001 note), which relates to nondiscrimination on the basis of age in any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance.
[52 FR 25357, July 7, 1987]
#### PEOPLE ex rel. GELLER, Appellant, v. WALDO, Com’r, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

February 11, 1915.)

Proceeding by the People of the State of New York, on the relation of Samuel Geller, against Rhinelander Waldo, as Commissioner.

E. J. Dryer, of New York City, for appellant. J. F. O’Brien, of New York City, for respondent.

No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Order filed.
EX-31 Rule13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications.

 

 

I, Leah Nivison,certify that:

 

1. I have reviewedthis report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed inrespect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of the GS MortgageSecurities Trust 2013-GC10 (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

 

2. Based on myknowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3. Based on myknowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required tobe provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is includedin the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4. Based on myknowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report underItem 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Actperiodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under theservicing agreements in all material respects; and

 

5. All of the reportson assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securitiesand their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance withservicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in thisreport in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except asotherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliancedescribed in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving thecertifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me bythe following unaffiliated parties:

 

Wells Fargo Bank,National Association, as Master Servicer, LNR Partners, LLC, as SpecialServicer, U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, Wells Fargo Bank,National Association, as Certificate Administrator, Wells Fargo Bank, NationalAssociation, as Custodian, TriMont Real Estate Advisors, Inc., as OperatingAdvisor, CoreLogic Commercial Real Estate Services, Inc., as Servicing FunctionParticipant, and National Tax Search, LLC, as Servicing Function Participant.

 

 

 

Dated: March 26, 2020

 

 

/s/ Leah Nivison

 

 

Chief ExecutiveOfficer

(seniorofficer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------

Certification of Periodic Financial Report


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, the undersigned, Louis P. Scheps, the President and
Chief Executive Officer, and Jeffery A. Baird, the Chief Financial Officer of
CAS Medical Systems, Inc., (the "issuer"), do hereby certify that the report on
Form 10-QSB accompanying this certification (the "report") fully complies with
the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that information contained in the report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the issuer.




/s/ Louis P. Scheps
------------------------
Louis P. Scheps
Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer
CAS Medical Systems, Inc.
November 11, 2004


/s/ Jeffery A. Baird
------------------------
Jeffery A. Baird
Chief Financial Officer
CAS Medical Systems, Inc.
November 11, 2004
#### § 436.21 Savings-to-investment ratio.

The savings-to-investment ratio is the ratio of the present value savings to the present value costs of an energy or water conservation measure. The numerator of the ratio is the present value of net savings in energy or water and non-fuel or non-water operation and maintenance costs attributable to the proposed energy or water conservation measure. The denominator of the ratio is the present value of the net increase in investment and replacement costs less salvage value attributable to the proposed energy or water conservation measure.

[61 FR 32651, June 25, 1996]