alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 431.485 Energy conservation standards.

(a) For the purpose of paragraphs (b), (c) and (d) of this section, “THP” means dedicated-purpose-pool pump motor total horsepower.

(b) Each dedicated-purpose pool pump motor manufactured starting on September 29, 2025, with a THP less than 0.5 THP, must have a full-load efficiency that is not less than 69 percent.

(c) Each dedicated-purpose pool pump motor manufactured starting on the dates provided in table 1 to this paragraph (c) with a THP greater than or equal to 0.5 THP must be a variable speed control dedicated-purpose pool pump motor, and must follow the requirements in paragraph (d) of this section.

| Equipment class | Compliance date |
| --- | --- |
| Small-size (0.5 ≤ THP <1.15) | September 28, 2027. |
| Standard-size (1.15 ≤ THP ≤ 5) | September 29, 2025. |

Table 1 to Paragraph (c)

(d) All dedicated-purpose pool pump motors with a THP greater than or equal to 0.5 THP and distributed in commerce with freeze protection controls, must be shipped with freeze protection disabled or with the following user-adjustable settings:

(1) The default dry-bulb air temperature setting is no greater than 40 °F;

(2) The default run time setting shall be no greater than 1 hour (before the temperature is rechecked); and

(3) The default motor speed (in revolutions per minute, or rpm) in freeze protection mode shall not be more than half of the maximum operating speed.

[88 FR 67041, Sept. 28, 2023]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

OFFICE OF THE CLERK

POST OFFICE BOX 711

MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA 36101-0711

DEBRA P. HACKETT, CLERK

TELEPHONE (334) 954-3600

March 22, 2007

NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY

 REGARDING CORPORATE/

CONFLICT STATEMENT

To: U.S. Foodservice, Inc. & U.S. Foodservice, Inc. - Montgomery Division 

From: Clerk’s Office

Case Style: Fluker et al v. U.S. Foodservice, Inc. et al

Case Number: 2:06-cv-00785-MHT

Notice is hereby given that pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 7.1, and this

Court’s General Order Miscellaneous Case No. 00-3047 parties are required to file their

Corporate/Conflict Disclosure Statement at their initial appearance.

No corporate/conflict disclosure statement has been filed by you in this action.

This deficiency must be corrected within ten (10) days from this date. Please refer to

attachment.

Case 2:06-cv-00785-MHT-WC Document 28 Filed 03/22/2007 Page 1 of 1


**SAMPLE NOTICE FORMAT**

Note: When E-Filing this pleading, please enter a separate docket entry. The event entry is located on

CM/ECF by clicking: CIVIL > OTHER DOCUMENTS > CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

________________________ DIVISION

_________________________________, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CASE NO. __________________

)

_________________________________, )

)

Defendants, )

CORPORATE/CONFLICT DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

In accordance with the order of this Court, the undersigned party or parties to the

above-captioned matter do hereby make the following disclosure concerning parent

companies, subsidiaries, affiliates, partnership, joint ventures, debtor, creditors’ committee,

or other entities reportable under the provisions of the Middle District of Alabama’s General

Order No. 3047:

There are no entities to be reported.

- or -

The following entities are hereby reported:

____________________________________________________

____________________________________________________

____________________________________________________

 Signature 

 Date Counsel

 

Counsel for (print names of all parties)

 

Address, City, State Zip Code

 

Telephone Number

***Certificate of Service Required

Case 2:06-cv-00785-MHT-WC Document 28-2 Filed 03/22/2007 Page 3 of 3
§ 13.16 Disqualification of reviewing official or ALJ. ( a ) A reviewing official or ALJ in a particular case may disqualify himself or herself at any time.
( b ) A party may file with the ALJ a motion for disqualification of a reviewing official or an ALJ. Such motion shall be accompanied by an affidavit alleging personal bias or other reason for disqualification.
( c ) Such motion and affidavit shall be filed promptly upon the party's discovery of reasons requiring disqualification, or such objections, shall be deemed waived.
( d ) Such affidavit shall state specific facts that support the party's belief that personal bias or other reason for disqualification exists and the time and circumstances of the party's discovery of such facts. It shall be accompanied by a certificate of the representative of record that it is made in good faith.
( e ) Upon the filing of such a motion and affidavit, the ALJ shall proceed no further in the case until he or she resolves the matter of disqualification in accordance with paragraph (f) of this section.
( f ) ( 1 ) If the ALJ determines that a reviewing official is disqualified, the ALJ shall dismiss the complaint without prejudice.
( 2 ) If the ALJ disqualifies himself or herself, the case shall be reassigned promptly to another ALJ.
( 3 ) If the ALJ denies a motion to disqualify, the authority head may determine the matter only as part of its review of the initial decision upon appeal, if any.
PGI 204.7303-3 Cyber incident and compromise reporting.       (a) When a cyber incident is reported by a contractor, the DoD Cyber Crime Center (DC3) will send an unclassified encrypted email containing the cyber incident report to the contracting officer(s) identified on the Incident Collection Format (ICF). The DC3 may request the contracting officer send a digitally signed e-mail to DC3.          (1) The procuring contracting officer (PCO) shall notify the requiring activities that have contracts identified in the ICF. In cases where an administrative contracting officer (ACO) receives the cyber incident report, in lieu of the PCO, the ACO shall notify the PCO for each affected contract, who will then notify the requiring activity.          (2) In cases of cyber incidents involving multiple contracts, the DoD components will collaboratively designate a single contracting officer to coordinate additional actions required of the contractor, on behalf of the affected DoD components. The requiring activity will notify the contracting officer once a lead is designated.          (3) If the requiring activity requests an assessment of compliance with the requirements of the clause at DFARS 252.204-7012 related to the cyber incident, the contracting officer shall—          (i) Consult with the DoD component Chief Information Officer (CIO)/cyber security office;          (ii) Request a description of the contractor’s implementation of the security requirements in NIST SP 800-171, “Protecting Controlled Unclassified Information in Nonfederal Information Systems and Organizations” (see http://dx.doi.org/10.6028/NIST.SP.800-171) in order to support evaluation of whether any of the controls were inadequate, or if any of the controls were not implemented at the time of the incident; and          (iii) Provide a copy of the assessment of contractor compliance to the requiring activity, the DoD CIO at osd.dibcsia@mail.mil, and the other contracting officers listed in the cyber incident report.          (b) When requested by the contractor, the contracting officer shall provide the contractor with the “Instructions for Malware Submission” document available at http://www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/pdi/docs/Instructions_for_Malware_Submissio.... The contracting officer should never receive malicious software directly from the contractor.          (c) If the requiring activity requests access to contractor information or equipment, in accordance with DFARS 252.204-7012(f), the contracting officer shall provide a written request to the contractor.          (d) For additional information on cyber incident reporting, see the Frequently Asked Questions document at http://www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/pdi/network_penetration_reporting_and_contr....    **Parent topic:** PGI 204.7303 Procedures.
Exhibit
31.1



CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I,
Gavin D. Southwell, certify that:



1.
I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A of Health Insurance Innovations, Inc.;



2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
to the period covered by this report.



Date:
May 7, 2019



|/s/
    Gavin D. Southwell                | 
|----------------------------------------- | 
|GAVIN
    D. SOUTHWELL                    | 
|PRESIDENT
    AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER | 
|(Principal
    Executive Officer)         |
Case 2:06-cv-00796-WKW-CSC Document 17 Filed 12/07/2006 Page 1 of 4
Case 2:06-cv-00796-WKW-CSC Document 17 Filed 12/07/2006 Page 2 of 4
Case 2:06-cv-00796-WKW-CSC Document 17 Filed 12/07/2006 Page 3 of 4
Case 2:06-cv-00796-WKW-CSC Document 17 Filed 12/07/2006 Page 4 of 4
§ 430.48 Request for reconsideration. ( a ) Any petitioner whose petition for a rule has been denied may request reconsideration within 30 days of denial. The request shall contain a statement of facts and reasons supporting reconsideration and shall be submitted in writing to the Secretary.
( b ) The denial of a petition will be reconsidered only where it is alleged and demonstrated that the denial was based on error in law or fact and that evidence of the error is found in the record of the proceedings.
( c ) If the Secretary fails to take action on the request for reconsideration within 30 days, the request is deemed denied, and the petitioner may seek such judicial review as may be appropriate and available.
( d ) A petitioner has not exhausted other administrative remedies until a request for reconsideration has been filed and acted upon or deemed denied.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsBOREAS TE-6 Predawn Leaf Water Potentials and Foliage Moisture ContentsThe BOREAS TE-6 team collected several data sets to examine the influence of vegetation, climate, and their interactions on the major carbon fluxes for boreal forest species. This data set contains summaries of predawn leaf water potentials and foliage moisture contents collected at the TF and CEV sites that had canopy access towers. The data were collected on a nearly weekly basis from early June to late August 1994 by TE-06, members of the BOREAS staff, and employees of Environment Canada. The data are provided in tabular ASCII files. The data files are available on a CD-ROM (see document number 20010000884), or from the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) Distributed Activity Archive Center (DAAC).Document ID20010005740Acquisition SourceGoddard Space Flight CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsHall, Forrest G.*(NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt, MD United States)*Curd, Shelaine*(Raytheon Information Technology and Scientific Services Greenbelt, MD United States)*Vogel, Jason G.*(Wisconsin Univ. Madison, WI United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 7, 2013Publication DateOctober 1, 2000Subject CategoryEarth Resources And Remote SensingReport/Patent NumberRept-03136-0-/VOL144NAS 1.15:209891/VOL144NASA/TM-2000-209891/VOL144Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 462-33-01Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20010005740.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR 

THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

 NORTHERN DIVISION

PROGRESSIVE AMERICAN )

INSURANCE COMPANY, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

vs. ) CIVIL ACTION NUMBER:2:06cv717-1D

)

CAROL THORN; et al. )

)

Defendants. )

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

COMES NOW Evan P. Baggett of Bradford & Sears, P.C., and respec tfully requests

this honorable court enter his name as additional counsel for the Progressive American

Insurance Company, in the above-referenc ed case . 

 /s/ Evan P. Baggett 

 Evan P. Baggett, Attorney for Plaintiff,

Progressive American Insurance Company

Federal ID Number: asb-5568-v79b

OF COUNSEL:

Bradford & Sears, P.C.

2020 Canyon Road

Suite 100

Birmingham, AL 35216

(205) 871-7733

ebaggett@bradfordsears.com

Case 2:06-cv-00717-ID-SRW Document 99 Filed 12/12/2007 Page 1 of 2
-2-

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that I have this the 12th day of December, 2007, served a copy

of the foregoing to all attorneys of record by placing a copy of same in the United States

Mail, postage prepaid and properly addressed as follows:

Mathew Richardson, Esq.

Sidney W. Jackson, III , Esq.

Jackson, Foster & Graham

P.O. Box 2225

Mobile, AL 36602

Ronald G. Davenport, Esq.

Rushton, Stakely, Johnston & Garrett, P.A.

P.O. Box 270

Montgomery, Alabama 36101-0270

Edgar M. Elliott, IV, Esq.

505 North 20TH Street, Suite 1800

Birmingham, Alabama 35203

Jimmie R. Ippolito, Jr., Esq.

1409 Coliseum Boulevard 

Montgomery, Alabama 36130

Greer B. Mallette, Esq.

Christian & Small, LLP 

505 20th Street North 

1800 Financial Center 

Birmingham, AL 35203-2695 

 /s/ Evan P. Baggett 

OF COUNSEL

Case 2:06-cv-00717-ID-SRW Document 99 Filed 12/12/2007 Page 2 of 2
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

EDWARD J. CURTIS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D17-860

[June 7, 2018]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Geoffrey D. Cohen, Judge; L.T. Case No. 

16013890CF10A.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Benjamin Eisenberg, Assistant 

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Don M. Rogers, 

Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

WARNER, TAYLOR and LEVINE, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
(logo) LNR

          Partners, LLC

 

 

ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE OF

 

LNR PARTNERS, LLC

 

 

The undersigned, Job Warshaw,being the President of LNR Partners, LLC (the "Special Servicer"), asspecial servicer under the applicable Pooling and Servicing Agreement, herebycertifies, as of the date hereof, on behalf of the Special Servicer, solely inhis capacity as an authorized officer of the Special Servicer and not in hisindividual capacity, as follows:

 

1.       A review of the activitiesperformed by the Special Servicer during the period commencing on January 1,2018 and ending on December 31, 2018 (the "Reporting Period"), and ofthe Special Servicer's performance under the Pooling and Servicing Agreementhas been made under my supervision; and

 

2.       To the best of my knowledge, basedon such review and using the applicable servicing criteria under Item 1122 ofRegulation AB, the Special Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations underthe applicable Pooling and Servicing Agreement in all material respectsthroughout the Reporting Period.

 

LNR PARTNERS, LLC,

a Florida limited liabilitycompany

 

 

By: /s/ Job Warshaw

Job Warshaw

President

 

 

Dated: February 19, 2019

 

 

1601 Washington Avenue • Suite 700 • Miami Beach,Florida 33139-3164

Telephone: (305) 695-5600 • Fax: (305) 695-5601
#### § 50.37 Agreement limiting access to Classified Information.

As part of its application and in any event before the receipt of Restricted Data or classified National Security Information or the issuance of a license, construction permit, early site permit, or standard design approval, or before the Commission has adopted a final standard design certification rule under part 52 of this chapter, the applicant shall agree in writing that it will not permit any individual to have access to, or any facility to possess, Restricted Data or classified National Security Information until the individual and/or facility has been approved for access under the provisions of 10 CFR parts 25 and/or 95. The agreement of the applicant becomes part of the license, or construction permit, or standard design approval.

[89 FR 57719, July 16, 2024]
Unassociated Document

EXHIBIT 10.1


    RESOLUTIONS
ADOPTED BY THE

     

    HUMAN
RESOURCES AND COMPENSATION COMMITTEE OF THE

     

    BOARD
OF DIRECTORS OF ESCO TECHNOLOGIES INC.

     

    


     

    The
following Resolutions were adopted by the Human Resources and Compensation
Committee of the Board of Directors of ESCO Technologies Inc.:

     

    WHEREAS, ESCO Technologies
Inc. (the “Company”) adopted the ESCO Technologies Inc. 2004 Incentive
Compensation Plan (the “2004 Plan”), the ESCO Technologies Inc. 2001 Stock
Incentive Plan (the “2001 Plan”) and the ESCO Technologies Inc. 1999 Stock
Option Plan (the “1999 Plan”) (each. a “Plan” and collectively the “Plans”);
and

     

    WHEREAS, the Human Resources
and Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company (the
“Committee”) has been appointed to administer the
Plans;  and

     

    WHEREAS, Section 7(j) of the
2004 Plan and the 2001 Plan and Section 13 of the 1999 Plan  contain a
provision that options will be granted only on the condition that all purchases
of stock thereunder shall be for investment purposes and not with a view to
resale or distribution (the “Investment Purpose Restriction”), except that the
Committee may make such provision for the release of the Investment Purpose
Restriction upon registration with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
“SEC”) of the stock subject to the options; and

     

    WHEREAS, there are currently
effective registration statements on file with the SEC covering the stock
subject to options granted under each of the Plans:

     

    NOW,
THEREFORE, BE IT

     

    RESOLVED, that as long as
there is an effective registration statement on file with the SEC covering the
stock subject to an option granted under a Plan, the Investment Purpose
Restriction shall not apply to such option; and BE IT FURTHER

     

    RESOLVED, that the proper
officers of the Company be, and they hereby are, authorized and directed to take
such further action as may be necessary of desirable to carry out the intent of
the foregoing.

     

    IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the
foregoing Resolutions were adopted by the Committee on the 4th day
of February, 2010.
Case 2:06-cr-00202-WKW-CSC Document 6 Filed 08/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
2007-2124.

#### In re L.J.

Clermont App. No. CA2007-07-080, 2007-Ohio-5498. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal and claimed appeal of right. Upon review of the appeal it appears that the case involves the termination of parental rights. Accordingly,

It is ordered by the court, sua sponte, that this ease shall proceed according to the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court of Ohio governing the termination of parental rights or adoption of a minor child. Appellee’s memorandum in response shall be filed no later than 20 days from the date of this entry.
Employment Arrangement with John Young



 Exhibit 10(jj) 
 John Young 
 Employment Arrangement 
 On February 15, 2010, the Organization and Compensation Committee (O&C Committee) of the Board approved several changes to John Young’s
compensation arrangement. Pursuant to Mr. Young’s amended employment arrangement, effective January 1, 2010, Mr. Young’s base salary was increased from $1,000,000 to $1,200,000, and Mr. Young was granted a new
cash-based retention incentive award (Retention Award). Under the terms of the Retention Award, Mr. Young is entitled to receive on September 30, 2012, to the extent Mr. Young remains employed by EFH Corp. on such date (with customary
exceptions for death, disability and leaving for “good reason” or termination without “cause”), an additional one-time, lump-sum cash payment equal to 100% of the aggregate Executive Annual Incentive Plan award received by (or
otherwise payable to) Mr. Young for fiscal years 2009, 2010 and 2011. 
 In addition, pursuant to Mr. Young’s amended employment
arrangement, EFH Corp. will (i) purchase, on behalf of Mr. Young a 10 year term life insurance policy in an insured amount equal to $10,000,000 and (ii) adopt a supplemental retirement plan for Mr. Young that vests on
December 31, 2014 (with customary exceptions for death, disability and leaving for “good reason” or termination without “cause”) with a value of $3,000,000. 
 Pursuant to Mr. Young’s amended employment arrangement, Mr. Young received a grant of 3,000,000 new stock options under the 2007 Stock Incentive Plan for Key Employees of Energy Future
Holdings Corp. and Affiliates (Stock Option Plan) at a strike price of $3.50 per share. Half of Mr. Young’s new stock options are cliff-vested options that will vest 100% on September 30, 2014, and the other half are time-vested
options that will vest 20% per year over a five-year period beginning September 30, 2009. In connection with the grant of these new stock options, Mr. Young surrendered to EFH Corp. 1,500,000 unvested performance-related stock options
that were granted to Mr. Young when he joined EFH Corp.
§ 436.17 Establishing energy or water cost data. ( a ) Each Federal agency shall establish energy costs in the base year by multiplying the total units of energy used in the base year by the price per unit of energy in the base year as determined in accordance with § 436.14(c).
( b ) When energy costs begin to accrue in the base year, the present value of energy costs over the study period is the product of energy costs in the base year as established under § 436.17(a), multiplied by the appropriate modified uniform present worth factor adjusted for energy price escalation for the applicable region, sector, fuel type, and study period consistent with § 436.14, or as calculated by computer software provided or approved by DOE and used with the official discount rate and escalation rate assumptions under § 436.14. When energy costs begin to accrue at a later time, subtract the present value of energy costs over the delay, calculated using the adjusted, modified uniform present worth factor for the period of delay, from the present value of energy costs over the study period or, if using computer software, indicate a delayed beneficial occupancy date.
( c ) Each Federal agency shall establish water costs in the base year by multiplying the total units of water used in the base year by the price per unit of water in the base year as determined in accordance with § 436.14(c).
( d ) When water costs begin to accrue in the base year, the present value of water costs over the study period is the product of water costs in the base year as established under § 436.17(a), or as calculated by computer software provided or approved by DOE and used with the official discount rate and assumptions under § 436.14. When water costs begin to accrue at a later time, subtract the present value of water costs over the delay, calculated using the uniform present worth factor for the period of delay, from the present value of water costs over the study period or, if using computer software, indicate a delayed beneficial occupancy date.
[55 FR 48220, Nov. 20, 1990, as amended at 61 FR 32650, June 25, 1996]