alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
313.003 Policy.

Electronic and information technology (EIT) supplies and services acquired pursuant to Federal

Acquisition Regulation part 13 shall comply with Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as

amended. See part 339.

Parent topic: PART 313 - SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION PROCEDURES
§ 435.201 Scope 1 Fossil fuel-generated energy consumption determination. ( a ) The Scope 1 fossil fuel-generated energy consumption of a proposed design is calculated as follows:
Equation: Scope 1 Fossil Fuel-Generated Energy Consumption = Direct Fossil Fuel Consumption of Proposed Building/Floor Area Where: *Direct Scope 1 Fossil Fuel-Generated Energy Consumption of Proposed Building* equals the total site Scope 1 fossil fuel-generated energy consumption of the proposed building calculated in accordance with the method required in § 435.5(d), and measured in thousands of British thermal units per year (kBtu/yr), except that this term does not include fossil fuel consumption for emergency electricity generation. Agencies must include all on-site fossil fuel use or Scope 1 emissions associated with non-emergency generation from backup generators (such as those for peak shaving or peak shifting). Any energy generation or Scope 1 emissions associated with biomass fuels are excluded. Any emissions associated with natural gas for alternatively fueled vehicles (“AFVs”) (or any other alternative fuel defined at 42 U.S.C. 13211 that is provided at a Federal building) is excluded. For buildings with manufacturing or industrial process loads, such process loads shall be accounted for in the analysis for the building's fossil fuel consumption and GHG emissions, but the process loads are not subject to the phase down targets. *Floor Area* is the floor area of the structure that is enclosed by exterior walls, including finished or unfinished basements, finished or heated space in attics, and garages if they have an uninsulated wall in common with the house. Not included are crawl spaces, and sheds and other buildings that are not attached to the house.
#### § 170.32 Schedule of fees for health and safety, and safeguards inspections for materials licenses.

Materials licensees shall pay inspection fees as set forth in § 170.31.

[53 FR 52652, Dec. 29, 1988]
#### NELSON, Respondent, v. J. L. WHITING & J. J. ADAMS CO., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

July 31, 1914.)

Action by John Nelson against the J. L. Whiting & J. J. Adams Company.

No opinion. Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs.
#### In the Matter of Laquan H., Respondent Appellant.

[813 NYS2d 783]

In a juvenile delinquency proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 3, the appeal is from (1) a fact-finding order of the Family Court, Queens County (Hunt, J.), dated March 3, 2005, which, after a hearing, found that the appellant had committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would have constituted the crimes of robbery in the second degree, grand larceny in the fourth degree, criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree, attempted assault in the third degree, and menacing in the third degree, and (2) an order of disposition of the same court dated May 9, 2005, which, upon the fact-finding order and after a dispositional hearing, adjudicated the appellant a juvenile delinquent and placed him in the custody of the Office of Children and Family Services for a period of 18 months.

Ordered that the appeal from the fact-finding order is dismissed, without costs or disbursements, as that order was superseded by the order of disposition; and it is further,

Ordered that the appeal from the order of disposition is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the presentment agency *(see Matter of David H.,*69 NY2d 792, 793 [1987]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the appellant committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would have constituted the crimes of robbery in the second degree, grand larceny in the fourth degree, criminal possession of stolen property in the fifth degree, attempted assault in the third degree, and menacing in the third degree *(see Matter of Antoine P.,*25 AD3d 614 [2006]; *583
      *Matter of Jerrol H.,*19 AD3d 693 [2005]; *Matter of Corey C.,*23 AD3d 461 [2005]; *Matter of Canvas H.,*14 AD3d 511 [2005]). Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the fact-finding determination was not against the weight of the evidence *(cf.*CPL 470.15 [5]). Resolution of issues of credibility, as well the weight to be accorded to the evidence, are primarily questions to be determined by the trier of fact, which saw and heard the witnesses *(see Matter of Thomas S.,*26 AD3d 389 [2006]; *Matter of Jerrol H., supra; Matter of Tyrell A.,*249 AD2d 467, 468 [1998]; *cf. People v Gaimari,*176 NY 84, 94 [1903]). Its determination should be accorded great weight on appeal and should not be disturbed unless clearly unsupported by the record *(see Matter of Thomas S., supra; Matter of Jerrol H., supra; cf. People v Garafolo,*44 AD2d 86, 88 [1974]). Krausman, J.P., Luciano, Fisher and Dillon, JJ., concur.
Subpart 1231.2—Contracts With Commercial Organizations    **Parent topic:** PART 1231—CONTRACT COST PRINCIPLES AND PROCEDURES1231.205 Selected costs.1231.205-3270 Precontract costs—incurrence of costs.       (a) The decision to incur precontract costs is the responsibility of the contractor. DOT officials shall not authorize, demand, or require a contractor to incur precontract costs. The contracting officer may advise the prospective contractor that any costs incurred before contract award are at the contractor's sole risk and that if negotiations fail to result in a binding contract, payment of these costs may not be made by the Government.          (b) When the contracting officer determines that incurring precontract costs was necessary to meet the proposed contract delivery schedule of a cost-reimbursement contract, the clause at 1252.231–70, Date of Incurrence of Costs, may be inserted in the resultant contract.
§ 452.2 Definitions. As used in this part: *Cellulosic biofuel* means any liquid fuel produced from cellulosic feedstocks.
*Cellulosic feedstock* means any lignocellulosic feedstock as defined by EPAct, section 932(a)(2).
*Commercially significant quantity* means 10 million gallons or more of cellulosic biofuels produced in one year.
*DOE* means the U.S. Department of Energy.
*Eligible biofuels producer* means a business association, including but not limited to a sole proprietorship, partnership, joint venture, corporation, or other business entity that owns and operates, or plans to own and operate, an eligible cellulosic biofuels production facility and that meets all other eligibility requirements that are conditions on the receipt of production incentives under this part.
*Eligible cellulosic biofuels production facility* means a facility— ( 1 ) Located in the United States (including U.S. territories and possessions);
( 2 ) Which meets all applicable Federal and State permitting requirements;
( 3 ) Employs a demonstrated refining technology; and
( 4 ) Meets any relevant financial criteria established by the Secretary.
*EPAct 2005* means the Energy Policy Act of 2005, Public Law 109-58 (August 8, 2005).
*Open window* means the period during each reverse auction, as specified in an associated solicitation, during which DOE accepts bids for production incentives under this part.
*Secretary* means the Secretary of Energy.
1

Hearing on the DLA PCB 

Import Petition

July 8, 2014
2

PCB Petition Process

TSCA 6(e)(3)(B) allows any person to petition 

EPA for an exemption from the §6(e)(3) ban on 

manufacturing (which includes imports), 

processing and distribution-in-commerce of 

PCBs

Limited to one year duration

Notice-and-comment rulemaking

Includes an opportunity for an informal hearing
3

Rulemaking for DLA

Petition

On April 23, 2013, EPA received a petition from Defense Logistics 

Agency (DLA), a component of the United States Department of 

Defense (DOD), to import foreign-manufactured PCBs that DOD 

currently owns in Japan for disposal in the US.

The PCBs and PCB Items are currently in storage at U.S. military installations in 

Japan.

DLA estimates that as much as 1,014,222 pounds of waste contaminated with 

PCBs could be generated in Japan through the end of calendar year 2014. DLA

estimates that 94% of the waste is at concentrations below 50 ppm.

The PCB waste would be imported for proper disposal in the U.S. (i.e. disposal in 

accordance with the regulations set forth in 40 CFR 761)

Submission of the petition triggered an EPA process to review the 

petition and begin the rulemaking process

EPA has proposed to grant DLA the import exemption
4

Hearing Objective

EPA is here to receive your comments

The proposed rule represents our preliminary conclusions based 

on the information we have. EPA is here to gather any additional 

information that is available, and we will fully consider all the 

comments that are presented today.

At the hearing, participants may be asked to answer questions 

submitted by the audience (in writing to the Hearing Clerk) at 

EPA's discretion. However, EPA would prefer that all questions 

are raised and addressed through the cross examination 

procedure (40 CFR 750.20), where questions are submitted to 

the Hearing Clerk by July 22, 2014 (tentative) and responses are 

supplied by August 12, 2014 (tentative). 
5

Hearing Schedule

Time Speaker

9:00 a.m. – 9:15 a.m. William Noggle (EPA) – Introduction

9:15 a.m. – 9:45 a.m. Dr. Rennae Anderson

9:45 a.m. – 11:00 a.m. Presentations/Comments from hearing attendees

11:00 a.m. – 11:15 a.m. --- Break ---

11:15 a.m. – 1:00 p.m. Continue presentations/comments from hearing attendees
6

Hearing Format

Hearing will be open for public comments from 

approximately 9:00 a.m. until 1:00 p.m.

If you would like to speak, please fill out the sign-in sheet with the 

Hearing Clerk

One 15 minute break scheduled for approximately 11:00 

a.m.

Doors will remain open, so feel free to come and go as 

needed. However, please try not to interrupt presentations
7

Hearing Contact

For any questions, please contact William Noggle

Noggle.william@epa.gov

703-347-8769

EPA Website for the DLA Petition

http://www.epa.gov/epawaste/hazard/tsd/pcbs/dlapcb.htm
1216.603-4 Contract clauses.

The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 1252.216–74, Settlement of Letter Contract, in all

definitized letter contracts.

Parent topic: Subpart 1216.6—Time-and-Materials, Labor-Hour, and Letter Contracts
H. Res. 228

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

May 3, 2005.

Whereas the Vietnamese who resettled in the United States

after the events of April 1975 have, through perseverance

and hard work, been able to rebuild their lives and form

a vibrant community across the United States, nearly a

million and a half strong, which contributes in many significant ways to the richness and diversity of American

society;

Whereas the large flow of refugees to the United States and

elsewhere was caused by the fall of the Republic of Vietnam to the Communist forces of North Vietnam in April

1975, resulting in a world refugee crisis of historic proportions, the exodus of millions of Vietnamese, and hundreds of thousands of deaths at sea;

Whereas since 1975, Vietnamese Americans have worked tirelessly to promote freedom and democracy in Vietnam;

Whereas the United States honors all members of the United

States Armed Forces and members of the South Vietnamese forces who fought in the Vietnam conflict, including those individuals who gave the ultimate sacrifice,

their lives, for the cause of freedom during such conflict;

and
2

•HRES 228 EH

Whereas the interests of the United States with respect to

the Socialist Republic of Vietnam will be best served

when the Vietnamese people fully enjoy the exercise of

their basic human rights regardless of politics, religion,

gender, or ethnic origin: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

(1) honors the significant contributions of Vietnamese Americans to the richness, diversity, and success

of American society;

(2) observes the 30th anniversary of the large exodus of refugees from Vietnam when the Republic of Vietnam fell to the Communist forces of North Vietnam;

(3) supports all individuals taking part in events in

Washington, D.C. and across the United States to commemorate these momentous events in world history;

(4) honors the memory of those Vietnamese who

lost their lives in that refugee exodus; and

(5) urges all citizens of the United States to share

in remembering these events and working toward the full

realization of freedom, democracy, and equality for all

the people of Vietnam.

Attest:

Clerk.
ex-10_15.htm


    Exhibit
10.15

     

    


     

    Amendment to Costa
Employment Agreement

     

    


    First
Amendment to Employment Agreement

    


    This
First Amendment to Employment Agreement (this "First Amendment") is entered into
as of December 31, 2009 by and between Eastman Chemical Company ("Eastman") and
Mark J. Costa ("Costa") (collectively referred to as the "Parties") concerning
that certain Employment Agreement (the "Agreement") between the Parties entered
into as of May 4, 2006.

    


    The
Parties agree that effective as of the date of this First Amendment, Section 6
of the Agreement is hereby amended to delete Section 6(a) (which provided an
annual personal travel allowance of $75,000) and restated in its entirety as
follows:

    


    "6.           PERSONAL BENEFITS AND
PROVISIONS. In addition to other payments and benefits provided
hereunder, (a) Costa will receive customary perquisites as provided to other
Eastman executive officers; and (b) the annual personal travel allowance of
$75,000 previously provided in Section 6(a) of this Agreement shall be included
in Costa’s annual cash compensation, comprised of his annual base salary and
target annual variable cash incentive pay."

    


    Except as
amended by this First Amendment, the Agreement remains in full force and
effect.

    


    


    
      	 
      	 
      	 
      	 
      	 
      
	
              Norris
      P. Sneed

            	 
      	
              Mark
      J. Costa

            	 
      	
              Date

            
	
              Senior
      Vice President Manufacturing Support and Chief Administrative
      Officer

            	 
      	
              Executive
      Vice President Specialty Polymers, Coatings and Adhesives, and Chief
      Marketing Officer

            	 
      	 
      


    

    


    


    


    


    


    


    


    


    


    


    


    


    


    


    


    


    


    


    


    


    


    


    


    139


    
      
        
           

          Eastman
Chemical Company – CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of CST Brands, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014 , as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Kimberly S. Lubel, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





|   |                                                                                                                      
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




|   |                                                                                                                                                     
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.










/s/ Kimberly S. Lubel


Kimberly S. Lubel


Chief Executive Officer, President and Chairman of the Board


June 8, 2015








This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1964, as amended.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                             5
<LEGEND>
This schedule  contains  summary  financial  information  extracted from CENTURY
PENSION  INCOME FUND XXIII 2000 Third  Quarter  10-QSB and is  qualified  in its
entirety by reference to such 10-QSB filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                 0000764543
<NAME>                                CENTURY PENSION INCOME FUND XXIII
<MULTIPLIER>                                              1,000

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                     DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                        JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                                    1,793
<SECURITIES>                                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                             1,280
<ALLOWANCES>                                                  0
<INVENTORY>                                                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                              0 <F1>
<PP&E>                                                        0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                           18,058
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                         0 <F1>
<BONDS>                                                  38,844
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                         0
<PREFERRED>                                                   0
<COMMON>                                                      0
<OTHER-SE>                                                    0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                  0
<SALES>                                                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                              0
<CGS>                                                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                 0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                              0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                            0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                               0
<INCOME-TAX>                                                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                           0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                               0
<CHANGES>                                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                                  0
<EPS-BASIC>                                                0.00 <F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                 0
<FN>
<F1> Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet. <F2> Multiplier is 1.
</FN>


</TABLE>
#### Byrd *et al. v.*Howard *et al.*

November 18, 1913.

Injunction. Before Judge Mathews. Bibb superior court. September *22,*1913.

The same counsel as in the case next preceding.

Hill, J.

TMs case is controlled by the decision this day rendered in the case of *Howard*v. *Cassidy,*ante.

*Judgment in part affirmed, with direction; and in part reversed.*

*AU the Justices concur.*
Subpart 836.2 - Special Aspects of

Contracting for Construction

Parent topic: PART 836 - CONSTRUCTION AND ARCHITECT-ENGINEER CONTRACTS

836.202 Specifications.

836.202-70 Specifications - use of equal products.

Upon approval of the justification documentation required by FAR 11.105, Items peculiar to one

manufacturer, the contracting officer shall include the clause found at 852.236-90, Restriction on

Submission and Use of Equal Products, in solicitations and contracts. The contracting officer shall

complete the clause by inserting the items which have been approved for restriction to a brand

name. This clause also places offerors or bidders on notice that the “brand name” provisions of any

clause or provision that may authorize the submission of an “equal” product, shall not apply to the

specific items listed in clause 852.236-90.

836.203 Government estimate of construction costs.

836.203-70 Protection of the independent government

estimate - sealed bid.

For sealed bid acquisitions the contracting officer or bid custodian is not authorized to release the

basis for calculating the estimate at any time. The person preparing the independent government

estimate (IGE) shall -

(a) Designate the IGE as “For Official Use Only (FOUO)”;

(b) The contracting officer or bid custodian shall file a sealed copy of the IGE with the bids. (In the

case of two-step acquisitions, the contracting officer or bid custodian accomplishes this during the

second step);

(c) After the bids are read and recorded during a Public Bid Opening, remove the “For Official Use

Only (FOUO)” designation then read and record the estimate as if it were a bid, in the same detail as

the bids; and

(d) In instances where only one bid has been received, the government estimate shall not be read by

the contracting officer as it may be needed to conduct negotiations with the offeror.

836.204 Disclosure of the magnitude of construction
projects.

The contracting officer shall utilize the estimated price ranges defined in FAR 36.204(a) through (e)

as further supplemented below when identifying the magnitude of a VA project in advance notices

and solicitations:

(f) For estimated price ranges between $1,000,000 and $5,000,000, the contracting officer shall

identify the magnitude of a VA project in advance notices and solicitations in terms of the following

price ranges:

(1) Between $1,000,000 and $2,000,000.

(2) Between $2,000,000 and $5,000,000.

(g) Between $5,000,000 and $10,000,000.

(h) For estimated price ranges greater than $10,000,000, the contracting officer shall identify the

magnitude of a VA project in advance notices and solicitations in terms of one of the following price

ranges:

(1) Between $10,000,000 and $20,000,000.

(2) Between $20,000,000 and $50,000,000.

(3) Between $50,000,000 and $100,000,000.

(4) Between $100,000,000 and $150,000,000.

(5) Between $150,000,000 and $200,000,000.

(6) Between $200,000,000 and $250,000,000.

(7) More than $250,000,000.
# Subpart 828.1 - Bonds and Other Financial Protections

**Parent topic:**PART 828 - BONDS AND INSURANCE

## 828.106 Administration.

## 828.106-70 Bond premium adjustment.

The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 852.228-70, Bond Premium Adjustment, in solicitations and contracts when performance and payment bonds or payment protection is required. 

## 828.106-71 Assisting service-disabled veteran-owned and veteran-owned small businesses in obtaining bonding.

VA prime contractors are encouraged to assist SDVOSB concerns and VOSB concerns in obtaining subcontractor performance and payment bonds. Mentors are especially encouraged to assist their protégés in obtaining bid, payment, and performance bonds as prime contractors and bonds as subcontractors when bonds are required. 

## 828.106-72 Contract provision.

Insert 852.228-72, Assisting Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned and Veteran-Owned Small Businesses in Obtaining Bonds, in solicitations that include FAR clause 52.228-1, Bid Guarantee.