alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
H. Res. 385

In the House of Representatives, U.S., 

July 27, 2005.

Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it 

shall be in order without intervention of any point of order 

to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 5) to improve patient 

access to health care services and provide improved medical 

care by reducing the excessive burden the liability system 

places on the health care delivery system. The bill shall be 

considered as read. The previous question shall be considered 

as ordered on the bill to final passage without intervening 

motion except: (1) two hours of debate on the bill equally divided and controlled by the Majority Leader and the Minority 

Leader or their designees; and (2) one motion to recommit. 

SEC. 2. During consideration of H.R. 5 pursuant to this 

resolution, notwithstanding the operation of the previous 
2

•HRES 385 EH 

question, the Chair may postpone further consideration of the 

bill to a time designated by the Speaker. 

Attest:

Clerk.
###### Editorial Note on Part 32

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 32 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

#### § 32.60 [Reserved]
2003.203 Reporting suspected violations of

the gratuities clause.

(a) Suspected violations of the “Gratuities” clause, FAR 52.203.3, must be reported orally or in

writing directly to the NRC Office of the Inspector General. A report must include all facts and

circumstances related to the case. Refer to 5 CFR part 2635 for an explanation regarding what is

prohibited and what is permitted.

(b) When appropriate, discussions with the contracting officer or a higher procurement official,

procurement policy staff, and the procurement legal advisor before filing a report are encouraged.

Parent topic: Subpart 2003.2 - Contractor Gratuities to Government Personnel
COMMITTEE ON ENERGY AND COMMERCE SUirCOMMITIa ON COMMIALL, MANLIIACIUIONO UNU Tnnu 

### CHARLES A. GONZALEZ

MEMRES OF CONC.iIThSS 2Oi Dsriucr, TOXAD 

# €onrz of th Uuiitd tats
touBc of Rpitsrntatiutz Wat1il1gtofl, 

# DI 2O5)-32O 1436 LONCIwOD ri-I OrFICE SLOWING Vr/Arrr ANGI IN, DC 206104320 (202) 220 3236 PHONE (202) 225-1915 FA>c

0-124 (

- LOLIIAL (OUILLANG 727 EAST DILOANGO SAN AN1OI4rO, TEXAS 782O6--126 (210) 4726190 PsosE 210) 4724000 FAX SonIrIMMrTTrL AN ENCFII3V AND I'Owtrr SLII3COrAMITTEI ON HEALTh
COMMITTEE ON HOIJSF ADMINJISTRAIION SU000NIMlILE ON Ecuerrous SIETOMMI rIFE Oil OVENSILIri

CIhoro CONGOESSIGNAL ElISIONS. Caucus



# The Honorable Gina McCarthy Assistant Administrator Office of Air and Radiation Environmental Protection Agency Ariel Rios Building 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue Nw Washington, D.C. 20460-0001 Dear Assistant Administrator McCarthy: J write to express my concerns with EPA's intent to proceed with "Tier 3" rulemaking that would establish more stringent fuel specifications and light-duty vehicle emissions standards. It is my understanding that EPA will likely issue a proposed rule by the end of the year and a final rule in 2012 with compliance expected in 2016. The Anti-Backsliding provision of the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 directs EPA to study and implement fuel changes to negate any detrimental air quality impacts resulting from the Renewable Fuels Standard. However, given that EPA has not conducted the required EISA study, whether EPA has overcome the burden of proof to justify these specification changes and meet the statutory requirements has come into question. Not surprisingly, industry has voiced concerns about the effects these new regulations would have on the refining industry, including increased costs, decreased gasoline supplies, and possible refinery closures, as well as on our nation's energy security. As you know, during House consideration of the FY 12 Interior-Environment appropriations bill an amendment will likely be offered that would withhold funds from the EPA to implement "Tier 3" regulations until a study is completed. While I am inclined to oppose such an amendment because of its adverse effect on the agency to carry out its responsibilities conferred by Congress, I have concerns that EPA is exercising its authority without adequate analysis contemplated by the required study. Specifically, by failing to provide the supporting data that the agency is required to use as the basis for this rulemaking, EPA is limiting public comment and input. As with the Cross-State Air Pollution and Utility MACT rules, I am concerned that EPA may be moving too quickly with Tier 3 regulations and that stakeholders will once again believe that they are unable to provide adequate feedback or comply with the rule's deadline for compliance. Therefore, I urge you to complete the Anti-Backsliding study first and allow public comment and input on the research and data underlying EPA's efforts to promulgate "Tier 3" rules. Should you wish to discuss the matter further, please do not hesitate to contact me.

# Page 2

July 26, 2011
# PGI 217.1 -MULTIYEAR CONTRACTING

**Parent topic:**PGI Part 217 - SPECIAL CONTRACTING METHODS

## PGI 217.174 Multiyear contracts for electricity from renewable energy sources.

The business case analysis template and guidance for the head of the contracting activity determination to enter into a contract for a period in excess of 5 years is available here: http://www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/dars/dfars/changenotice/2010/20100621/2008-D006%20PGI%20Template.doc.
§ 110.108 Appearance in an oral hearing. ( a ) A participant may appear in a hearing on his own behalf or be represented by an authorized representative.
( b ) A person appearing shall file a written notice stating his name, address and telephone number, and if an authorized representative, the basis of his eligibility and the name and address of the participant on whose behalf he appears.
( c ) A person may be excluded from a hearing for disorderly, dilatory or contemptuous conduct, provided he is informed of the grounds and given an opportunity to respond.
##### 



Exhibit 31.2
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) UNDER THE EXCHANGE ACT
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of B.H.I.T. Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant is made known to us by others, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    [Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238];c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andd)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Date:  August 11, 2006
    By:
    /s/ John V. CurciJohn V. CurciVice-President, Treasurer & Chief Financial Officer
Principal Accounting Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3544 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3544

       To reduce temporarily the duty on Thiamethoxam Technical.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 20, 2006

  Mr. Carper introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
       To reduce temporarily the duty on Thiamethoxam Technical.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. THIAMETHOXAM TECHNICAL.

    (a) Calendar Years 2007-2008.--
            (1) In general.--Heading 9902.03.11 of the Harmonized 
        Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to Thiamethoxam 
        Technical) is amended--
                    (A) by striking ``3.2%'' and inserting ``1.5%''; 
                and
                    (B) by striking ``12/31/2006'' and inserting ``12/
                31/2008''.
            (2) Effective date.--The amendments made by paragraph (1) 
        shall take effect on January 1, 2007.
    (b) Calendar Year 2009.--
            (1) In general.--Heading 9902.03.11, as amended by 
        subsection (a), is further amended--
                    (A) by striking ``1.5%'' and inserting ``3.0%''; 
                and
                    (B) by striking ``12/31/2008'' and inserting ``12/
                31/2009''.
            (2) Effective date.--The amendments made by paragraph (1) 
        shall take effect on January 1, 2009.
                                 <all>
```
§ 490.301 Definitions. In addition to the definitions found in section 490.2, the following definitions apply to this subpart— *Affiliate* means a person that, directly or indirectly, controls, is controlled by, or is under common ownership or control of a person subject to vehicle acquisition requirements in this part.
*Alternative Fuels Business* means activities undertaken to derive revenue from— ( 1 ) Producing, storing, refining, processing, transporting, distributing, importing, or selling at wholesale or retail any alternative fuel other than electricity; or
( 2 ) Generating, transmitting, importing, or selling at wholesale or retail electricity.
*Business Unit* means a semi-autonomous major grouping of activities for administrative purposes and organizational structure within a business entity and that is controlled by or under control of a person subject to vehicle acquisition requirements in this part.
*Division* means a major administrative unit of an enterprise comprising at least several enterprise units or constituting a complete integrated unit for a specific purpose and that is controlled by or under control of a person subject to vehicle acquisition requirements in this part.
*Normal Requirements and Practices* means the operating business practices and required conditions under which the principal business of a person subject to vehicle acquisition requirements in this part operates.
*Principal Business* means the sales-related activity that produces the greatest gross revenue.
*Substantial Portion* means that at least 30 percent of the annual gross revenue of a covered person is derived from the sale of alternative fuels.
*Substantially Engaged* means that a covered person, or affiliate, division, or other business unit thereof, regularly derives more than a negligible amount of sales-related gross revenue from an alternative fuels business.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

M IDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABA M A

OFFICE OF THE CLERK

POST OFFICE BOX 711

MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA 36101-0711

DEBRA P. HACKETT, CLERK

TELEPHONE (334) 954-3600

September 14, 2006

NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT

Re: Russell E. Garner v. Progressive Direct Insurance Company

Civil Action No. #1:06-cv-00781-DRB

The above-styled case has been reassigned to Judge Myron H. Thompson.

Please note that the case number is now #1:06-cv-00781-MHT. This new case number should be

used on all future correspondence and pleadings in this action.

 

Case 1:06-cv-00781-MHT-TFM Document 4 Filed 09/14/2006 Page 1 of 1
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
You havereached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC)Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC.Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of catalogingand locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications.  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the eventthat publications are no longer available from the original publishing agencysite. (Historical purposes)
**Title:****Quarterlyreview**** 
SuDocNumber:HS1.17:
ItemNumber:0520-B-22(online)
CGPSystem Number:000602192
 
 - qr-3-2.pdfqr-5-1.pdfqr-5-2.pdfqr-5-3a.pdfqr-5-4.pdfqr-6-1.pdfqr-6-2.pdfqr-6-3.pdfqr-6-4.pdfqr-7-1.pdfqr-7-2.pdfqr-7-3.pdfqr-7-4.pdf
 **
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. AD04-4-001]

                    On October 20, 2009, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) requested applications to be included on a list of resource experts willing to serve as a third panel member in the Commission's hydropower integrated licensing process (ILP) study dispute resolution process. We are extending the application period until August 15, 2010, to afford interested parties more time to respond to the original request. Respondents to the initial request need not reapply to be considered. Information on the application contents and how to file applications can be found in the October 20, 2009 notice or on the Commission's Web page at:                     *http://www.ferc.gov/​industries/​hydropower.asp*. For more information please contact David Turner at (202) 502-6091 or                     *david.turner@ferc.gov.*

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,

Deputy Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2010-3158 Filed 2-18-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

 v. ) CR. NO. 2:06-cr-200-WHA 

)

ROSA E. RINCON )

MOTION FOR LEAVE TO DISMISS COUNT TWO OF INDICTMENT

Comes now the United States of America, by and through its Attorney for the Middle

District of Alabama, and moves the Court for leave to dismiss Count Two of the Indictment

filed on August 15, 2006, as to Rose Rincon. on the following grounds: Interest of Justice.

Respectfully submitted this 1 day of December, 2006. st

LEURA G. CANARY

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

/s/ Christopher A. Snyder

CHRISTOPHER A. SNYDER

Assistant United States Attorney

Post Office Box 197

Montgomery, Alabama 36101-0197

334.223.7280

334.223.7135 fax

christopher.a.snyder@usdoj.gov

Case 2:06-cr-00200-WHA-CSC Document 87 Filed 12/01/2006 Page 1 of 2
2

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

 )

 v. ) CR. NO. 2:06-cr-200-WHA 

)

ROSA E. RINCON )

 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on December 1, 2006, I electronically filed the foregoing with the

Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing to

the following: Jay Lewis.

Respectfully submitted,

 LEURA G. CANARY

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

/s/ Christopher A. Snyder

CHRISTOPHER A. SNYDER

Assistant United States Attorney

One Court Square, Suite 201

Montgomery, Alabama 36104

Telephone: (334) 223-7280

Fax: (334) 223-7135

E-mail: christopher.a.snyder@usdoj.gov

Case 2:06-cr-00200-WHA-CSC Document 87 Filed 12/01/2006 Page 2 of 2
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

 v. ) CR. NO. 2:06-cr-200-WHA 

)

ROSA E. RINCON )

O R D E R

Upon consideration of the Motion for Leave to Dismiss Count Two of the Indictment as to

Rosa E. Rincon, heretofore filed in the above styled cause, and for good cause shown, the Court is

of the opinion that the motion should be and the same hereby is granted. It is, therefore,

CONSIDERED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED by the Court that said motion be and

the same is hereby granted.

DONE this day of December, 2006.

 

 W. HAROLD ALBRITTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

DISMISSAL OF COUNT TWO OF THE INDICTMENT

Comes now the United States of America with leave of the Court first had and obtained and

dismisses Count Two of the Indictment heretofore filed in the above styled cause as to Rosa E.

Rincon.

Respectfully submitted,

LEURA GARRETT CANARY

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

/s/ Christopher A. Snyder

CHRISTOPHER A. SNYDER

Assistant United States Attorney

Post Office Box 197

Montgomery, Alabama 36101-0197

334.223.7280

334.223.7135 fax

christopher.a.snyder@usdoj.gov

Case 2:06-cr-00200-WHA-CSC Document 87-2 Filed 12/01/2006 Page 1 of 1
PGI 225.7502 Procedures.

If the Balance of Payments Program applies, use the following procedures:

(1) Solicitation of offers. Identify, in the solicitation, supplies and construction material known in

advance to be exempt from the Balance of Payments Program.

(2) Evaluation of offers.

(i) Supplies. Unless the entire acquisition is exempt from the Balance of Payments Program, evaluate

offers for supplies that are subject to the Balance of Payments Program using the evaluation

procedures in DFARS Subpart 225.5. However, treatment of duty may differ when delivery is

overseas.

(A) Duty may not be applicable to nonqualifying country offers.

(B) The U.S. Government cannot guarantee the exemption of duty for components or end products

imported into foreign countries.

(C) Foreign governments may impose duties. Evaluate offers including such duties as offered.

(ii) Construction. Because the contracting officer evaluates the estimated cost of foreign and

domestic construction material in accordance with DFARS 225.7501(a)(7)(iv) before issuing the

solicitation, no special procedures are required for evaluation of construction offers.

(3) Postaward. For construction contracts, the procedures at FAR 25.206, for noncompliance under

the Buy American statute, also apply to noncompliance under the Balance of Payments Program.

Parent topic: PGI 225.75 -BALANCE OF PAYMENTS PROGRAM
Exhibit
32





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The
undersigned hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the quarterly
report of United States Basketball League, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly
period ended August 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
contained in such quarterly report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material
respects the financial condition and results of operation of United States
Basketball League, Inc.





Date:  October
8, 2010





/s/ Daniel T. Meisenheimer,
    IIIDaniel
      T. Meisenheimer, IIIPresident





Date:  October
8, 2010





/s/ Richard C.
  MeisenheimerRichard
      C. MeisenheimerChief
      Financial Officer
#### § 5.200 Application.

Except as provided in §§ 5.205 through 5.235(a), these Title IX regulations apply to every recipient and to each education program or activity operated by such recipient that receives Federal financial assistance.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.9


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of ImClone Systems Incorporated (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Harlan
W. Waksal, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.




/S/ Harlan W. Waksal
------------------------------
Harlan W. Waksal
Chief Executive Officer
August 14, 2002
222 So.2d 68

#### STATE of Louisiana v. Renaldo GAUTHIER.

No. 49857.

May 15, 1969.

In re: Renaido Gauthier applying for writs of certiorari, mandamus and prohibition.

The application is denied and the stay order is recalled. The judgment is cor*19rect. See Art. 21, Code of Criminal Procedure.

BARHAM, J., is of the opinion the writ should be granted. The transcript reflects that defendant was denied the opportunity of being heard orally in defense or mitigation and this is violative of C.Cr.Pro. Articles 21 and 22.
#### § 430.45 Hearing.

The Secretary may hold a public hearing, and publish notice in the Federal Register of the date and location of the hearing, when he determines that such a hearing is necessary and likely to result in a timely and effective resolution of the issues. A transcript shall be kept of any such hearing.