alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
      32





**Certification
      Pursuant to 18. U.S.C. Section 1350,**


**As
      Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002**





In
      connection with the quarterly report of B.H.I.T., Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
      10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2008 (the “Report”) filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, the undersigned, being
      the Interim Chief Executive Officer and Interim Chief Financial Officer of
      the
      Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of § 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/
                Paul S. DennisPaul
                S. DennisInterim
                Chief Executive Officerand
                Financial Officer





Date:
      August 8, 2008
Subpart 1847.3—Transportation in Supply Contracts    **Parent topic:** PART 1847—TRANSPORTATION1847.305 Solicitation provisions, contract clauses, and transportation factors.1847.305-70 NASA contract clauses.       (a) The contracting officer may insert a clause substantially as stated at 1852.247–72, Advance Notice of Shipment, in solicitations and contracts when the f.o.b. point is destination and special Government assistance is required in the delivery or receipt of the items.          (b) The contracting officer shall insert a clause substantially as stated at 1852.247–73, Bills of Lading, in f.o.b. origin solicitations and contracts.
#### HOWARD et al., Respondents, v. HOFFELD, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

December 2, 1914.)

Action by Clarence M. Howard and others against Henry R. Hoffeld.

No opinion. Judgment affirnled, costs.
#### § 25.25 Cancellation of requests for access authorization.

When a request for an individual's access authorization or renewal of an access authorization is withdrawn or canceled, the requestor shall notify the CSA immediately by telephone so that the single scope background investigation, national agency check with law and credit investigation, or other personnel security action may be discontinued. The requestor shall identify the full name and date of birth of the individual, the date of request, and the type of access authorization or access authorization renewal requested. The requestor shall confirm each telephone notification promptly in writing.

[64 FR 15648, Apr. 1, 1999]
UNITE D STATE S DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO N FEDERA LAVIATIO N ADMINISTRATIO N

WASHINGTON , D.C . 4 1 Nort h7 3 West , Inc. , db aAVITA T Westcheste r

an dJe t System s COMPLAINANT/APPELLAN T Th e Count y o f

Westchester , New Yor k RESPONDENT/APPELLE E Docke t No . 16-07-1 3

NOTIC E O FEXTENSIO N O FTIM E Thi s matte r

i s befor e th e Federa l Aviatio n Administratio n (FAA ) base do n th e above

reference dcomplaint , file di n accordanc e wit hFA A Rule s o f

Practic e fo r

Federally

- '''' ^ Assiste dAirpor t

Enforcemen t

Proceedings , 1 4 CFRPar t 16 . Pursuan t

t o 1 4 CFRPar t

1 ^ subpart B , th e dat e b y whic hth e Fina l Agenc y Decisio n wil l b e issue di n thi s matte r i s Q hereb y extende dt o Apri l 13 , 2009 . A n extensio n o f

tim e i s necessar y an dappropriat e for afair an dcomplet e determinatio n i n thi s case . 

# M^A . Catherin e M . Lan . Actin g Associat

i for Airport s mistrato r 

### . 

### J^^ . 0" ^ Dat eCERTIFICAT E O FSERVIC E

I HEREB Y CERTIF Y tha t o n " ^ I place di n th e Unite d State s mai l (firs t

class , postag e paid ) atru e cop y o f th e foregoin g documen t

addresse dto : Pete r J . Kirsch Davi dI . Specto r KAPLA N KIRSC H & ROCKWELL , LL P 167 5 Broadway , Suit e 230 0 Denver , Colorad o 8020 2 Richar dCashman Jame s Wenze l Count y o f

Westcheste r 1 8 Martin e Avenue , Roo m60 0 Whit e Plains , Ne w York , 1060 1 FA A Par t 1 6 Airport

Proceeding s Docke t



### - 7 -'•'" 7

--' /-^ ^ ^ 3 £ ^ >Jikit aD i Brigh t Airpor t Complianc e an dFiel dOperation s
Subpart 648.1—Policies and Procedures

Parent topic: PART 648—VALUE ENGINEERING

648.102 Policies.

(a) The authority to grant exemptions prescribed in FAR 48.102(a), or to extend future contract

savings or sharing pursuant to FAR 48.102(g), is delegated, without power of redelegation, to the

head of the contracting activity (see 601.603–70).
IV 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 187 

Expressing support for a National Week of Reflection and Tolerance. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 5, 2005 

Mr. RANGEL submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Government Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for a National Week of Reflection and 

Tolerance. 

Whereas the United States is a pluralistic country comprised 

of different races, genders, ethnic groups, religions, and 

creeds; 

Whereas our Nation, founded on the principles of tolerance, 

diversity, justice, and equality, should affirm these common values and principles; and 

Whereas the people of the United States should reflect on the 

importance of understanding and tolerance in our pluralistic country: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That a National Week of Reflection and 

2 Tolerance should be established encouraging communities 

3 and institutions around the Nation to engage in events 
2 

•HRES 187 IH 

1 and activities that are reflective, educational, celebratory, 

2 and healing as they relate to diversity among the people 

3 of the United States. 

Æ
Editorial Note on Part 40
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 40 appear at 79 FR 75740, Dec. 19, 2014.

§ 40.67 Requirement for advance notice for importation of natural uranium from countries that are not party to the Convention on the Physical Protection of Nuclear Material. ( a ) Each licensee authorized to import natural uranium, other than in the form of ore or ore residue, in amounts exceeding 500 kilograms, from countries not party to the Convention on the Physical Protection of Nuclear Material (see appendix F to part 73 of this chapter) shall notify the Director, Office of Nuclear Security and Incident Response, by email (preferred method) to *AdvanceNotifications.Resource@nrc.gov* or using an appropriate method listed in § 40.5. The notification must be in writing and must be received at least 10 days before transport of the shipment commences at the shipping facility.
( b ) The notification must include the following information: ( 1 ) The name(s), address(es), and telephone number(s) of the shipper, receiver, and carrier(s);
( 2 ) A physical description of the shipment;
( 3 ) A listing of the mode(s) of shipment, transfer points, and routes to be used;
( 4 ) The estimated date and time that shipment will commence and that each nation along the route is scheduled to be entered.
( c ) The licensee shall notify the Director, Office of Nuclear Security and Incident Response, by telephone at the numbers for the NRC Headquarters Operations Center specified in appendix A to part 73 of this chapter when the shipment is received in the receiving facility.
( d ) A licensee who needs to amend a notification shall notify the Director, Office of Nuclear Security and Incident Response, by telephone at the numbers specified for the NRC Headquarters Operations Center in appendix A to part 73 of this chapter.
[52 FR 9652, Mar. 26, 1987, as amended at 53 FR 4110, Feb. 12, 1988; 60 FR 24551, May 9, 1995; 68 FR 58808, Oct. 10, 2003; 69 FR 76600, Dec. 22, 2004; 74 FR 62681, Dec. 1, 2009; 83 FR 58723, Nov. 21, 2018; 85 FR 65662, Oct. 16, 2020; 86 FR 67842, Nov. 30, 2021]
§ 33.15 Requirements for the issuance of a Type C specific license of broad scope. An application for a Type C specific license of broad scope will be approved if: ( a ) The applicant satisfies the general requirements specified in § 30.33 of this chapter; and
( b ) The applicant submits a statement that byproduct material will be used only by, or under the direct supervision of, individuals who have received: ( 1 ) A college degree at the bachelor level, or equivalent training and experience, in the physical or biological sciences or in engineering; and
( 2 ) At least 40 hours of training and experience in the safe handling of radioactive materials, and in the characteristics of ionizing radiation, units of radiation dose and quantities, radiation detection instrumentation, and biological hazards of exposure to radiation appropriate to the type and forms of byproduct material to be used; and
( c ) The applicant has established administrative controls and provisions relating to procurement of byproduct material, procedures, record keeping, material control and accounting, and management review necessary to assure safe operations.
Exhibit No. 32.2   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with this report of Questar Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Martin H. Craven, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  QUESTAR CORPORATION   November 4, 2010 /s/Martin H. Craven Martin H. Craven Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.3

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 10 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Hannon Armstrong Sustainable Infrastructure Capital, Inc. (the Company) for
the period ended December 31, 2016 to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the report), I, Jeffrey W. Eckel, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



|1. | The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | It is not intended that this statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: March 23, 2017



|    |  |                                                
|--- |  | -----------------------------------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Jeffrey W. Eckel                           
|    |  | Name:  Jeffrey W. Eckel                        
|    |  | Title:    Chief Executive Officer and President
§ 20.2105 Records of planned special exposures. ( a ) For each use of the provisions of § 20.1206 for planned special exposures, the licensee shall maintain records that describe— ( 1 ) The exceptional circumstances requiring the use of a planned special exposure; and
( 2 ) The name of the management official who authorized the planned special exposure and a copy of the signed authorization; and
( 3 ) What actions were necessary; and
( 4 ) Why the actions were necessary; and
( 5 ) How doses were maintained ALARA; and
( 6 ) What individual and collective doses were expected to result, and the doses actually received in the planned special exposure.
( b ) The licensee shall retain the records until the Commission terminates each pertinent license requiring these records.
§ 13.23 Subpoenas for attendance at hearing. ( a ) A party wishing to procure the appearance and testimony of any individual at the hearing may request that the ALJ issue a subpoena.
( b ) A subpoena requiring the attendance and testimony of an individual may also require the individual to produce documents at the hearing.
( c ) A party seeking a subpoena shall file a written request therefor not less than 15 days before the date fixed for the hearing unless otherwise allowed by the ALJ for good cause shown. Such request shall specify any documents to be produced and shall designate the witnesses and describe the address and location thereof with sufficient particularity to permit such witnesses to be found.
( d ) The subpoena shall specify the time and place at which the witness is to appear and any documents the witness is to produce.
( e ) The party seeking the subpoena shall serve it in the manner prescribed in § 13.8. A subpoena on a party or upon an individual under the control of a party may be served by first class mail.
( f ) A party or the individual to whom the subpoena is directed may file with the ALJ a motion to quash the subpoena within ten days after service or on or before the time specified in the subpoena for compliance if it is less than ten days after service.
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 21

- 1461 V

UNPUBLISHED

CHARLES WALTER

,

Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent. Chief Special Master Corcoran

Filed: June 24, 2022

Special Processing Unit (SPU) ; Rul ing on Entitlement; Concession; Table Injury; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine;
Guillain

- Barre Syndrome (GBS)

Ronald Craig Homer, Conway, Homer, P.C., Boston, MA , for Petitioner.

Emily H. Manoso , U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT 1

On June 11, 2021

, Charles Walter filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa

- 10, et seq. 2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that he suffered Guillain

- Barré Syndrome ( “ GBS ” ), a defined Table Injury, after receiving an influenza vaccine on August 22 , 2018 . Petit ion at 1, ¶ 2

. Petitioner further alleges that he received the vaccination in the United States,

that he suffered the residual effects o f h is GBS for more than six months and that neither he nor any other party has filed a civil action or received compensation for her GBS, alleged as vaccine caused. Id. at ¶¶ 25

- 27

. T he case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

1 Because this unpublished R uling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E

- Government Act
of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the R uling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance
with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I wil l redact such material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99

- 660, 100 Stat. 3755

. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subpara graph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012 ). CORRECTED2

On June 23, 2022

, R espondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes that

P etitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at 1. Specifically, R espondent has concluded “ that [P]etitioner has satisfied the criteria set forth in the Vaccine Injury Tabl e ( “ Table ” ) and the Qualifications and Aids to Interpretation ( “ QAI ” )

. ” Id. at 6

.

In view of R espondent’s position and the evidence of record, I find that

P etitioner is entitled to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Brian H. Corcoran
Brian H. Corcoran
Chief Special Master
#### David Baye, Respondent, v Michele S. Grindlinger, Appellant.

In an action upon two promissory notes, defendant appeals from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated October 3, 1979, which granted the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment; (2) a judgment of the same court entered thereon on October 12, 1979, and (3) an order of the same court, dated November 23, 1979, which denied the defendant’s motion for reargument. Appeal from order dated November 23, 1979 dismissed. No appeal lies from an order denying reargument. Appeal from order dated October 3, 1979 dismissed (see *Matter of Aho,*39 NY2d 241, 248). Judgment reversed, order dated October 3, 1979 vacated and plaintiffs motion for summary judgment denied. Defendant is awarded one bill of $50 costs and disbursements to cover all appeals. The plaintiff, an attorney in Massachusetts, sues on two promissory notes in the sums of $5,322.55 and $2,000, respectively, each payable on demand and at 9% per annum, executed by the defendant, his client. The notes were made and delivered by the defendant during the course of a matrimonial action brought by the defendant against her husband in Massachusetts. At the time the plaintiff was retained defendant claims to have paid him $750, and she claims to have paid him thereafter an additional $1,250. The defendant alleges that the two notes in question were executed by her at the plaintiff’s demand at a time when a trial of the matrimonial action was imminent, and that she did not understand the full import of the transactions; she also alleges that the services rendered by the plaintiff were not reasonably worth the more than $7,000 for which he is suing to recover, in addition to the $2,000 already paid by her to him. The rule is well established that as to contracts made between an attorney and his client subsequent to employment which are beneficial to the attorney, it is incumbent on the attorney to show that the terms are fair and reasonable and fully known and understood by the client *(Matter of Howell,*215 NY 466, 472; *Matter of Schanzer,*7 AD2d 275, 278, affd 8 NY2d 972; *Cohen v Ryan,*34 AD2d 789, 790; *Matter of Potenza,*29 AD2d 213, 216; *Matter of Vaupel,*266 App Div 723). Hence, there are triable issues as to whether the amount claimed by the plaintiff reasonably represents the value of the services rendered to the defendant, whether, under the circumstances, the defendant was unfairly put in a position by the plaintiff in the litigation pending in Massachusetts that she might be without counsel in the trial shortly to be held, and whether the defendant understood the import of the transactions with the plaintiff at the time of the making and delivery' of the notes. That the contracts between the parties took the form of promissory notes does not alter the general rule imposing the burden of proof of fairness on the plaintiff. The existence of triable issues precludes the granting of summary judgment and requires a reversal. Hopkins, J. P., Mangano, O’Connor and Weinstein, JJ., concur.
IV 

House Calendar No. 56 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 341 

[Report No. 109–155] 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 3057) making appropriations 

for foreign operations, export financing, and related programs for the 

fiscal year ending September 30, 2006, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 27, 2005 

Mr. LINCOLN DIAZ-BALART, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered 

to be printed 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 3057) making 

appropriations for foreign operations, export financing, 

and related programs for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2006, and for other purposes. 

1 Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this 

2 resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of 

3 rule XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee 

4 of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consider5 ation of the bill (H.R. 3057) making appropriations for 
2 

HRES 341 RH 

1 foreign operations, export financing, and related programs 

2 for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2006, and for 

3 other purposes. The first reading of the bill shall be dis4 pensed with. All points of order against consideration of 

5 the bill are waived. General debate shall be confined to 

6 the bill and shall not exceed one hour equally divided and 

7 controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member 

8 of the Committee on Appropriations. After general debate 

9 the bill shall be considered for amendment under the five10 minute rule. Points of order against provisions in the bill 

11 for failure to comply with clause 2 of rule XXI are waived 

12 except as follows: beginning with ‘‘or’’ on page 113, line 

13 26, through page 114, line 10. Where points of order are 

14 waived against part of a section, points of order against 

15 a provision in another part of such section may be made 

16 only against such provision and not against the entire sec17 tion. During consideration of the bill for amendment, the 

18 Chairman of the Committee of the Whole may accord pri19 ority in recognition on the basis of whether the Member 

20 offering an amendment has caused it to be printed in the 

21 portion of the Congressional Record designated for that 

22 purpose in clause 8 of rule XVIII. Amendments so printed 

23 shall be considered as read. When the committee rises and 

24 reports the bill back to the House with a recommendation 

25 that the bill do pass, the previous question shall be consid-
3 

HRES 341 RH 

1 ered as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to 

2 final passage without intervening motion except one mo3 tion to recommit with or without instructions. 
House Calendar No. 56 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 341 

[Report No. 109–155] 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 3057) 

other purposes. cal year ending September 30, 2006, and for port financing, and related programs for the fismaking appropriations for foreign operations, exJUNE 27, 2005 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed
Case 2:06-cv-00785-MHT-WC Document 84 Filed 04/08/2008 Page 1 of 1
# SUBPART 6.2 – FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

*(Revised October 24, 2016 through PROCLTR 2016-10)*

**Parent topic:**PART 6 – COMPETITION REQUIREMENTS

## 6.202 Establishing or maintaining alternative sources.

(b)(1) By memorandum dated July 30, 2015, the DLA Acquisition Director has delegated approval and signature authority to the HCAs for the determination and findings required to exclude a source under FAR 6.202(b)(1) for procurements within their contracting activity. This authority may not be further delegated.