alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 431.304 Uniform test method for the measurement of energy consumption of walk-in coolers and walk-in freezers. ( a ) *Scope.* This section provides test procedures for measuring, pursuant to EPCA, the energy consumption of walk-in coolers and walk-in freezers.
( b ) *Testing and calculations.* Determine the energy efficiency and/or energy consumption of the specified walk-in cooler and walk-in freezer components by conducting the appropriate test procedure as follows: ( 1 ) *Display panels.* Determine the energy use of walk-in cooler and walk-in freezer display panels by conducting the test procedure set forth in appendix A to this subpart.
( 2 ) *Display doors and non-display doors.* Determine the energy use of walk-in cooler and walk-in freezer display doors and non-display doors by conducting the test procedure set forth in appendix A to this subpart.
( 3 ) *Non-display panels and non-display doors.* Determine the R-value of insulation of walk-in cooler and walk-in freezer non-display panels and non-display doors by conducting the test procedure set forth in appendix B to this subpart.
( 4 ) *Refrigeration systems.* Determine the AWEF and net capacity of walk-in cooler and walk-in freezer refrigeration systems by conducting the test procedures set forth in appendix C or C1 to this subpart, as applicable. Refer to the notes at the beginning of those appendices to determine the applicable appendix to use for testing. ( i ) *For unit coolers:* follow the general testing provisions in sections 3.1 and 3.2, and the equipment-specific provisions in section 3.3 of appendix C or sections 4.5 through 4.8 of appendix C1.
( ii ) *For dedicated condensing units:* follow the general testing provisions in sections 3.1 and 3.2, and the product-specific provisions in section 3.4 of appendix C or sections 4.5 through 4.8 of appendix C1.
( iii ) *For single-packaged dedicated systems:* follow the general testing provisions in sections 3.1 and 3.2, and the product-specific provisions in section 3.3 of appendix C or sections 4.5 through 4.8 of appendix C1.
[74 FR 12074, Mar. 23, 2009, as amended at 76 FR 21605, Apr. 15, 2011; 76 FR 33631, June 9, 2011; 76 FR 65365, Oct. 21, 2011; 79 FR 27412, May 13, 2014; 79 FR 32123, June 3, 2014; 81 FR 95802, Dec. 28, 2016; 88 FR 28839, May 4, 2023]
§ 218.1 Purpose and scope. ( a ) This part implements section 251 of the Energy Policy and Conservation Act (Pub. L. 94-163) (42 U.S.C. 6271), as amended, which authorizes the President to take such action as he determines to be necessary for performance of the obligations of the United States under chapters III and IV of the Agreement on an International Energy Program (TIAS 8278), insofar as such obligations relate to the mandatory international allocation of oil by International Energy Program participating countries.
( b ) *Applicability.* This part applies to any firm engaged in producing, transporting, refining, distributing or storing oil which is subject to the jurisdiction of the United States.
#### GEPPERT v. MUSICAL AMERICA CO.

Appellate Division, First Department.

December 11, 1914.)

Action by William Geppert against the Musical America Company.

No opinion. Motion to dismiss appeal granted, with $10 edsts. Order filed. See, also, 150 N. Y. Supp. 1087.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 33 (Friday, February 19, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 7483]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-3199]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center For Scientific Review; Amended Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the Center for 
Scientific Review Special Emphasis Panel, February 11, 2010, 1 p.m. to 
February 11, 2010, 5 p.m., National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, 
20892 which was published in the Federal Register on January 20, 2010, 
75 FR 3241-3242.
    The meeting will be held March 4, 2010. The meeting time and 
location remain the same. The meeting is closed to the public.

    Dated: February 3, 2010.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2010-3199 Filed 2-18-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
PGI 239.71 -SECURITY AND PRIVACY FOR

COMPUTER SYSTEMS

Parent topic: PGI Part 239 - ACQUISITION OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY

PGI 239.7102 Policy and responsibilities.

PGI 239.7102-3 Information assurance contractor training and certification.

(1) The designated contracting officer’s representative will document the current information

assurance certification status of contractor personnel by category and level, in the Defense

Eligibility Enrollment Reporting System, as required by DoD Manual 8570.01-M, Information

Assurance Workforce Improvement Program.

(2) DoD 8570.01-M, paragraphs C3.2.4.8.1 and C4.2.3.7.1, requires modification of existing

contracts to specify contractor training and certification requirements, in accordance with the

phased implementation plan in Chapter 9 of DoD 8570.01-M. As with all modifications, any change

to contract requirements shall be with appropriate consideration.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3513 

To amend the National Trails System Act to extend the Lewis and Clark 

National Historic Trail to include additional sites associated with the 

preparation or return phase of the Lewis Clark expedition, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 14, 2006 

Mr. BUNNING introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the National Trails System Act to extend the 

Lewis and Clark National Historic Trail to include additional sites associated with the preparation or return 

phase of the Lewis Clark expedition, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Lewis and Clark Na5 tional Historic Trail Extension Act of 2006’’. 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
2 

•S 3513 IS

1 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF TRAIL. 

2 Section 5(a)(6) of the National Trails System Act (16 

3 U.S.C. 1244(a)(6)) is amended— 

4 (1) by striking ‘‘(6) The’’ and inserting the fol5 lowing: 

6 ‘‘(6) THE LEWIS AND CLARK NATIONAL HIS7 TORIC TRAIL.—’’; 

8 (2) in the first sentence, by striking ‘‘The’’ and 

9 inserting the following: 

10 ‘‘(A) DESCRIPTION OF TRAIL.—The’’; 

11 (3) in the second sentence, by striking ‘‘The’’ 

12 and inserting the following: 

13 ‘‘(B) MAP.—The’’; 

14 (4) in the third sentence, by striking ‘‘The’’ and 

15 inserting the following: 

16 ‘‘(C) ADMINISTRATION.—The’’; and 

17 (5) by adding at the end the following: 

18 ‘‘(D) EXTENSION OF TRAIL.— 

19 ‘‘(i) IN GENERAL.—In addition to the 

20 route described in subparagraph (A), the 

21 Lewis and Clark National Historic Trail 

22 shall be extended to include the route fol23 lowed by Meriwether Lewis and William 

24 Clark, whether independently or together, 

25 in— 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
3 

•S 3513 IS

1 ‘‘(I) the preparation phase of the 

2 expedition, starting at Monticello, lo3 cated near Charlottesville, Virginia, 

4 and traveling to Wood River, Illinois; 

5 and 

6 ‘‘(II) the return phase of the ex7 pedition, starting from Saint Louis, 

8 Missouri, to Washington, D.C. 

9 ‘‘(ii) INCLUSION OF DESIGNATED

10 SITES.—The extended route shall include 

11 each designated Lewis and Clark site lo12 cated in— 

13 ‘‘(I) the State of Virginia; 

14 ‘‘(II) the District of Columbia; 

15 ‘‘(III) the State of Maryland; 

16 ‘‘(IV) the State of Delaware; 

17 ‘‘(V) the State of Pennsylvania; 

18 ‘‘(VI) the State of West Virginia; 

19 ‘‘(VII) the State of Ohio; 

20 ‘‘(VIII) the State of Kentucky; 

21 ‘‘(IX) the State of Tennessee; 

22 ‘‘(X) the State of Indiana; and 

23 ‘‘(XI) the State of Illinois. 

24 ‘‘(iii) STUDY.—Not later than 1 year 

25 after the date on which funds are first 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
4 

•S 3513 IS

1 made available to conduct a suitability and 

2 feasibility study, the Secretary of the Inte3 rior shall complete those studies to include 

4 the extended route.’’. 

Æ 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with BILLS
# Subpart 3033.1—Protests

Source:                                77 FR 50635, Aug. 22, 2012, unless otherwise noted.                               

**Parent topic:**PART 3033—PROTESTS, DISPUTES, AND APPEALS

## 3033.102 General.

## 3033.102-90 Protests on classified solicitations (OSA).

To ensure that classified information is protected and appropriate security measures are coordinated as required, protests involving classified solicitations issued by the Office of Selective Acquisitions (OSA) shall be submitted directly to the contracting officer for further transmission to the GAO, the United States Court of Federal Claims, or for internal resolution in the case of agency protests. Specific instructions will be provided in Section L of the solicitation.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6774

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

DEMORRIS ALEXANDER JAMES,

Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District 

Judge. (2:05-cr-00161-JBF-JEB-1)

Submitted: October 14, 2010 Decided: November 3, 2010

Before WILKINSON and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Demorris Alexander James, Appellant Pro Se. Sherrie Scott 

Capotosto, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, 

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Demorris Alexander James appeals the district court’s 

order granting his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion and 

reducing his sentence from 180 months’ to 150 months’ 

imprisonment based on a two-level reduction. We have reviewed 

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm 

for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. 

James, No. 2:05-cr-00161-JBF-JEB-1 (E.D. Va. Jan. 6, 2010); see 

also Dillon v. United States, 130 S. Ct. 2683, 2693-94 (2010) 

(clarifying that § 3582(c)(2) does not authorize a resentencing,

but rather permits a sentence reduction within the narrow bounds 

established by the Commission, and concluding that United States 

v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005), does not apply to § 3582(c)(2) 

proceedings). We dispense with oral argument because the facts 

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED
Subpart 2016.3 - Cost Reimbursement Contracts    **Parent topic:** PART 2016 - TYPES OF CONTRACTS2016.307-70 Contract provisions and clauses.       (a) The contracting officer shall insert the provision at 2052.216-70, Level of Effort, in solicitations for negotiated procurements containing labor costs other than maintenance services to be awarded on a cost reimbursement, cost sharing, cost-plus-award fee, cost-plus-fixed fee, time and materials, or labor hour basis.          (b) The contracting officer may insert the following provisions and clauses in cost reimbursement contracts as applicable:          (1) Section 2052.216-71, Indirect Cost Rates (where provisional rates without ceilings apply).          (2) Section 2052.216-71, Indirect Cost Rates - Alternate 1 (where redetermined rates apply).          (3) Section 2052.216-71, Indirect Cost Rates (Ceiling) - Alternate 2 (where provisional rates with ceilings apply).          (c) The contracting officer may make appropriate changes to these clauses to reflect different arrangements.
PGI 207.503 Policy.       (S-70) Section 804 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2005 (Public Law 108-375) limits contractor performance of acquisition functions closely associated with inherently Governmental functions (see related conference language).    **Parent topic:** PGI 207.5 -INHERENTLY GOVERNMENTAL FUNCTIONS
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-20-00014-CR

Luis MARQUEZ,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 187th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2019CR5801

Honorable Stephanie R. Boyd, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ALVAREZ, JUSTICE RIOS, AND JUSTICE WATKINS

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is 

AFFIRMED.

SIGNED July 7, 2021.

_____________________________

Beth Watkins, Justice
Editorial Note on Part 40
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 40 appear at 79 FR 75740, Dec. 19, 2014.

§ 40.20 Types of licenses. ( a ) Licenses for source material and byproduct material are of two types: general and specific. Licenses for long-term care and custody of residual radioactive material at disposal sites are general licenses. The general licenses provided in this part are effective without the filing of applications with the Commission or the issuance of licensing documents to particular persons. Specific licenses are issued to named persons upon applications filed pursuant to the regulations in this part.
( b ) Section 40.27 contains a general license applicable for custody and long-term care of residual radioactive material at uranium mill tailings disposal sites remediated under title I of the Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act of 1978, as amended.
( c ) Section 40.28 contains a general license applicable for custody and long-term care of byproduct material at uranium or thorium mill tailings disposal sites under title II of the Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act of 1978, as amended.
[55 FR 45598, Oct. 30, 1990]
Agreement with the 10X Fund L.P.



 Exhibit 10.1 
 10X FUND, L.P. 
 1099 Forest Lake Terrace

 Niceville, Florida 32578 
 February 11, 2010 
 Pro-Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 
 7 Wells Avenue 
 Newton, MA 02459 
  

	 	Re:	Securities Purchase Agreement dated February 12, 2009 (the “Securities Purchase Agreement”) by and between 10X Fund, L.P. (the “Fund”) and
Pro-Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”), as amended on August 11, 2009 

 Dear Sirs: 
 I am writing to confirm that the Fund and the Company have agreed to the following in relation to the Securities Purchase Agreement: 
  

	 	(1)	the “Final Purchase Date” (as defined in the Securities Purchase Agreement) is hereby extended for three months and fourteen days, i.e., from
February 11, 2010 to May 25, 2010; and 

  

	 	(2)	The definition for “Series B-1 Redemption Date” contained in Section 1 of the Certificate of Designation of Preferences, Rights and Limitations for the
Series B-1 Convertible Preferred Stock (the “Certificate of Designation”) shall be amended to provide that such date will be twenty two months and fourteen days (22 months and 14 days) after the Original Issue Date of the Series B-1
Convertible Preferred Stock. 

  

	 	(3)	The definition for “Final Purchase Date” contained in Section 1 of the Certificate of Designation shall be amended to provide that is May 25, 2010.


  

	 	(4)	Section 3 of the Certificate of Designation shall be amended to provide that the Registration Statement Condition must only be true as to any dividends paid on or
after September 30, 2010. 

  

	 	(5)	The definition of “VWAP” contained in Section 1 of the Certificate of Designation shall be amended to correct certain errors in referring to possible
trading on the Pink Sheets. 

 In order to implement the agreements in Paragraph (2), (3) and (4) above, the Company
shall file the attached amendment to Certificate of Designation. This letter represents the entire agreement of the parties with respect to the subject matter of this letter. Nothing hereby shall be deemed to modify, amend, or waive any provision of
the Securities Purchase Agreement, or any documents or securities executed or issued pursuant thereto, except to the extent specifically stated herein. Please confirm that the Company has agreed to the terms set forth in this letter by executing and
returning a copy of this letter to me. 
  

			
	Very truly yours,
	
	10X FUND, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership
	
	 By: 10X CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LLC, a Florida
 limited liability company

	
	 /s/ James C. Czirr

	By:	 	James C. Czirr, Manager


  

			
	ACCEPTED AND AGREED TO:
	
	PRO-PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
	
	 /s/ Anthony D. Squeglia

	By:	 	Anthony D. Squeglia
	Its:	 	Chief Financial Officer
pwc(logo)

 

**Reportof Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

Tothe Board of Directors, PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.:

 

Wehave examined management’s assertion, included in the accompanying Report on Assessment of Compliance with Regulation ABServicing Criteria, that Midland Loan Services, a division of PNC Bank, National Association (“Midland” or the “Company”)complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB for alltransactions serviced on the *Enterprise!*Loan Management System (the “Platform”), as of December 31, 2016 andfor the year then ended, excluding criteria 1122(d)(1)(iii), 1122(d)(3)(i)(B), 1122(d)(3)(i)(C), 1122(d)(3)(i)(D), 1122(d)(3)(ii),1122(d)(3)(iii), 1122(d)(3)(iv), and 1122(d)(4)(xv), which the Company has determined are not applicable to the servicing activitiesperformed by it with respect to the Platform. Management is responsible for the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria.Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assertion based on our examination.

 

Ourexamination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States)and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicingcriteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testingof selected asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing of selected servicing activities relatedto the Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activitiesin compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activitiesperformed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to detect noncompliance arisingfrom errors that may have occurred prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculatedor reported by the Company during the period covered by this report. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basisfor our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria.

 

Inour opinion, management’s assertion that Midland complied with the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of andfor the year ended December 31, 2016 for the Platform is fairly stated, in all material respects.

 

/s/PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

 

February17, 2017

 

*PricewaterhouseCoopersLLP, 1100 Walnut Street, Suite 1300, Kansas City, MO 64106*

*T: (816) 472 7921, F: (816) 218 1890 www.pwc.com/us*
H. Res. 1100

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

December 8, 2006.

Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it 

shall be in order without intervention of any point of order 

to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 6406) to modify temporarily certain rates of duty and make other technical 

amendments to the trade laws, to extend certain trade preference programs, and for other purposes. The bill shall be 

considered as read. The previous question shall be considered 

as ordered on the bill to final passage without intervening 

motion except: (1) one hour of debate equally divided and 

controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of 

the Committee on Ways and Means; and (2) one motion to 

recommit. 

SEC. 2. In the engrossment of the House amendment to 

the Senate amendment to the bill (H.R. 6111) to amend the 

Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that the Tax Court 

may review claims for equitable innocent spouse relief and to 

suspend the running on the period of limitations while such 

claims are pending, the Clerk shall—
2

•HRES 1100 EH 

(1) add the text of H.R. 6406, as passed by 

the House, as new matter at the end of such engrossment; 

(2) assign appropriate designations to provisions within the engrossment; and 

(3) conform provisions for short titles within 

the engrossment. 

Attest:

Clerk.
#### § 431.71 Purpose and scope.

This subpart contains energy conservation requirements for commercial warm air furnaces, pursuant to Part C of Title III of the Energy Policy and Conservation Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 6311-6317.

[69 FR 61939, Oct. 21, 2004, as amended at 70 FR 60415, Oct. 18, 2005]
EXHIBIT
31.3



CERTIFICATION



I,
Jeremiah Silkowski, certify that:



|1. | I
    have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K ofSQN AIF
    IV, L.P.; and                                                                                                                                                                                                              
|-- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     
|2. | Based
    on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
    to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
    to the period covered by this report;



Date:
April 15, 2019



|/s/
    Jeremiah Silkowski        | 
|--------------------------------- | 
|Jeremiah
    Silkowski            | 
|Chief
    Financial Officer       | 
|(Principal
    Financial Officer) |
§ 39.65 Personnel monitoring. ( a ) The licensee may not permit an individual to act as a logging supervisor or logging assistant unless that person wears a personnel dosimeter at all times during the handling of licensed radioactive materials. Each personnel dosimeter must be assigned to and worn by only one individual. Film badges must be replaced at least monthly and all other personnel dosimeters that require replacement must be replaced at least quarterly. All personnel dosimeters must be evaluated at least quarterly or promptly after replacement, whichever is more frequent.
( b ) The licensee shall provide bioassay services to individuals using licensed materials in subsurface tracer studies if required by the license.
( c ) The licensee shall retain records of personnel dosimeters required by paragraph (a) of this section and bioassay results for inspection until the Commission authorizes disposition of the records.
[52 FR 8234, Mar. 17, 1987, as amended at 65 FR 63752, Oct. 24, 2000; 85 FR 15352, Mar. 18, 2020]