alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 13.39 Appeal to authority head. ( a ) Any defendant who has filed a timely answer and who is determined in an initial decision to be liable for a civil penalty or assessment may appeal such decision to the authority head by filing a notice of appeal with the authority head in accordance with this section.
( b ) ( 1 ) A notice of appeal may be filed at any time within 30 days after the ALJ issues an initial decision. However, if another party files a motion for reconsideration under § 13.38, consideration of the appeal shall be stayed automatically pending resolution of the motion for reconsideration.
( 2 ) If a motion for reconsideration is timely filed, a notice of appeal may be filed within 30 days after the ALJ denies the motion or issues a revised initial decision, whichever applies.
( 3 ) The authority head may extend the initial 30 day period for an additional 30 days if the defendant files with the authority head a request for an extension within the initial 30 day period and shows good cause.
( c ) If the defendant files a timely notice of appeal with the authority head and the time for filing motions for reconsideration under § 13.38 has expired, the ALJ shall forward the record of the proceeding to the authority head.
( d ) A notice of appeal shall be accompanied by a written brief specifying exceptions to the initial decision and reasons supporting the exceptions.
( e ) The representative for the Government may file a brief in opposition to exceptions within 30 days of receiving the notice of appeal and accompanying brief.
( f ) There is no right to appear personally before the authority head.
( g ) There is no right to appeal any interlocutory ruling by the ALJ.
( h ) In reviewing the initial decision, the authority head shall not consider any objection that was not raised before the ALJ unless a demonstration is made of extraordinary circumstances causing the failure to raise the objection.
( i ) If any party demonstrates to the satisfaction of the authority head that additional evidence not presented at each hearing is material and that there were reasonable grounds for the failure to present such evidence at such hearing, the authority head shall remand the matter to the ALJ for consideration of such additional evidence.
( j ) The authority head may affirm, reduce, reverse, compromise, remand, or settle any penalty or assessment, determined by the ALJ in any initial decision.
( k ) The authority head shall promptly serve each party to the appeal with a copy of the decision of the authority head and a statement describing the right of any person determined to be liable for a penalty or assessment to seek judicial review.
( l ) Unless a petition for review is filed as provided in 31 U.S.C. 3805 after a defendant has exhausted all administrative remedies under this part and within 60 days after the date on which the authority head serves the defendant with a copy of the authority head's decision, a determination that a defendant is liable under § 13.3 is final and is not subject to judicial review.
2007-2116.

#### State ex rel. Dolgencorp, Inc. v. Indus. Comm.

Franklin App. No. 06AP-1217, 2007-Ohio-5087.
Exhibit 3.1A

                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                       TO
                          CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                          IMCLONE SYSTEMS INCORPORATED

                Under Section 242 of the General Corporation Law
                            of the State of Delaware

      The  undersigned,  being the Executive Vice  President of IMCLONE  SYSTEMS
INCORPORATED,  a Delaware corporation (the "Corporation") DOES HEREBY CERTIFY as
follows:

      FIRST:  The  Certificate  of  Incorporation  of the  Corporation is hereby
amended so that Article FOURTH (a) shall read in its entirety as follows:

            "FOURTH:  (a) The total number of shares of capital  stock which the
      Corporation   shall  have  the   authority  to  issue  is  sixty   million
      (60,000,000)  shares of Common  Stock with a par value of one tenth of one
      cent  ($.001) per share and four million  (4,000,000)  shares of Preferred
      Stock with a par value of one dollar ($1.00) per share."

      SECOND:  That such amendment was duly adopted by the Board of Directors of
the  Corporation  and by the  Stockholders of the Corporation in accordance with
Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.

      IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  this  Certificate of Amendment to the Certificate of
Incorporation of the Corporation has been signed, and the statements made herein
affirmed as true under the penalties of perjury, this 2nd day of June 1999.


                                                     /s/Harlan W. Waksal
                                                     ------------------------
                                                     Harlan W. Waksal,
                                                     Executive Vice President


Attest:/s/ John  B. Landes
       -------------------------
       John B. Landes, Secretary
#### ANTHONY, Appellant, v. KOEHLER et al., Respondents.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

November 27, 1914.)

Action by Harold E. Anthony against Max Koehler and others. H. N. Selvage, of New York City, for appellant. O. J. Earley, of New York City, for respondents.

No opinion. Order ■reversed, with costs, verdict reinstated, and judgment directed for plaintiff on the verdict; with costs. Settle order on notice.
Exhibit 32

          Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
        Officer pursuant to 8 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to
                 Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.


                                  CERTIFICATION

In connection with the Quarterly Report of WaterChef, Inc., a Delaware
corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350 as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge and upon a review
of the Report that:

(1) the Report of the Company filed today pursuant to Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

This certification is based upon, among other things, my responsibilities as
Chief Executive Officer, my own due diligence and representations made by
certain members of the Company's senior management.

Dated: August 13, 2004


                                            /s/  David A. Conway
                                            ----------------------------------
                                                 David A. Conway
                                                 President,
                                                 Chief Executive Officer and
                                                 Chief Financial Officer
exv10w16






Exhibit 10.16




SPS Commerce, Inc. Non-Employee Director Compensation Policy





	 	 	 	Each non-management director of SPS Commerce, Inc. (the “Company”) will receive:
	 
	 	•	 	An initial stock option grant to purchase up to 60,000 shares (subject to adjustment
for the reverse stock split that will occur immediately prior to consummation of the
Company’s initial public offering) of the Company’s common stock upon appointment to the
board. Each grant will vest in equal monthly installments over three years for so long as
the director remains a member of the board.
	 
	 	•	 	An annual stock option grant to purchase up to 20,000 shares (subject to adjustment for
the reverse stock split that will occur immediately prior to consummation of the Company’s
initial public offering) of the Company’s common stock on the date of each annual meeting
of stockholders at which the director is elected to the board or continues to serve as a
director. Each grant will vest in full on the earlier of one year
after the date of grant or the date of the next year's annual meeting
of stockholders, provided the
director remains a member of the board as of the vesting date.
	 
	 	•	 	An annual retainer of $20,000.





               Each non-management director of the Company that chairs of a committee will receive an annual
fee as follows:



	 	 	 	 	 
	Committee Chair	 	Annual Cash Fee
	Audit
	 	$	11,000	 
	Compensation
	 	$	8,000	 
	Nominating and Governance
	 	$	5,000	 






               Each non-management director of the Company, other than the chair, that serves on a committee
will receive an annual fee as follows:



	 	 	 	 	 
	Non-Chair	 	 
	Committee Members	 	Annual Cash Fee
	Audit
	 	$	5,000	 
	Compensation
	 	$	4,000	 
	Nominating and Governance
	 	$	2,000	 






               The chairman of the Company’s board of directors will receive an additional annual fee of
$12,500.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 244 (Tuesday, December 21, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 80114-80115]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-31913]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS

[OMB Control No. 2900-0500]


Agency Information Collection (Status of Dependents 
Questionnaire) Activity Under OMB Review

AGENCY: Veterans Benefits Administration, Department of Veterans 
Affairs.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) of 1995 
(44 U.S.C. 3501-3521), this notice announces that the Veterans Benefits 
Administration (VBA), Department of Veterans Affairs, will submit the 
collection of information abstracted below to the Office of Management 
and Budget (OMB) for review and comment. The PRA submission describes 
the nature of the information collection and its expected cost and 
burden; it includes the actual data collection instrument.

DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before January 20, 2011.

ADDRESSES: Submit written comments on the collection of information 
through http://www.Regulations.gov or to VA's OMB Desk Officer, OMB 
Human Resources and Housing Branch, New Executive Office Building, Room 
10235, Washington, DC 20503 (202) 395-7316. Please refer to ``OMB 
Control No. 2900-0500'' in any correspondence.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Denise McLamb, Enterprise Records 
Service (005R1B), Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue, 
NW., Washington, DC 20420, (202) 461-7485, FAX (202) 461-0966 or e-mail 
denise.mclamb@ va.gov. Please refer to ``OMB Control No. 2900-0500.''

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Title: Status of Dependents Questionnaire, VA Form 21-0538.
    OMB Control Number: 2900-0500.
    Type of Review: Extension of a currently approved collection.
    Abstract: Veterans receiving compensation for service-connected 
disability which includes an additional amount for their spouse and/or 
child(ren) complete VA Form 21-0538 to certify the status of the 
dependents for whom additional compensation is being paid.
    An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required 
to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a 
currently valid OMB control number. The Federal Register Notice with a 
60-day comment period soliciting comments on this collection of 
information was published on October 12, 2010, at pages 62636-62637.

[[Page 80115]]

    Affected Public: Individuals or households.
    Estimated Annual Burden: 14,083 hours.
    Estimated Average Burden per Respondent: 10 minutes.
    Frequency of Response: Once every eight years.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 84,500.

    Dated: December 15, 2010.

    By direction of the Secretary.
Denise McLamb,
Program Analyst, Enterprise Records Service.
[FR Doc. 2010-31913 Filed 12-20-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-P
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

 NORTHERN DIVISION

 _______________________________

JAMES G. HUFFMAN *

Plaintiff, *

v. * 2:06-CV-748-MEF

SOUTHERN HEALTH SERVICES, et al., *

Defendants. *

 _______________________________

ORDER ON MOTION

Before the court is Plaintiff’s second motion for leave to amend complaint. The court

finds that this pleading seeks to amend claims unrelated to matters raised in the original

complaint. That is, Plaintiff’s original complaint contained a claim based on a dispute over

medical care and treatment related to a heart condition. By order filed September 29, 2006

the court granted Plaintiff’s September 28, 2006 motion to amend to add additional factual

allegations in support of the claim presented in the original complaint. (See Doc. No. 10.)

In his second request for leave to amend the complaint, Plaintiff seeks to add a claim

concerning Defendants' inaction regarding confiscation of his personal property which

occurred on September 12, 2006. (Doc. No. 18.) 

The court’s order of procedure at page 5, ¶6(f), states: “All amendments to the

complaint and/or motions to amend . . . must relate to the facts made the basis of the instant

complaint. . . . Any such amendments or motions which contain claims unrelated to the

Case 2:06-cv-00748-MEF-WC Document 19 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 1 of 2
claims presented in the original complaint will not be considered by the court.” (See Doc.

No. 5.) Claims which a complainant seeks to present to the court and which are unrelated

to claims presented in said complainant’s original complaint, must be filed in a separate

civil action and accompanied by the $350.00 filing fee or an application to proceed in forma

pauperis. Because the claims Plaintiff presents in his second motion for leave to amend

complaint are unrelated to the claims presented in his original complaint, as amended, the

court concludes that the motion is due to be denied.

For the reasons set forth above, it is 

ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint (Doc. No. 18) be

and is hereby DENIED. 

Done this 25th day of October, 2006.

 /s/Vanzetta Penn McPherson 

VANZETTA PENN MCPHERSON

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00748-MEF-WC Document 19 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 2 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR

THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) CASE NO. 2:06mj72-MEF

)

JOSHUA WAYNE HESTER )

O R D E R

It is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The current conditions of release (Doc. #7) are to be modified to include condition

7(t)(ii). This condition provides: “The defendant shall: (t) participate in one of the following

home confinement program components and abide by all the requirements of the program

which will include electronic monitoring or other location verification system. You shall pay

all or part of the cost of the program based on your ability to pay as determined by the pretrial

service office or supervising officer. (ii) Home Detention. You are restricted to your

residence at all times except from employment; education; religious services; other activities

as approved by the pretrial service office or supervising officer.” 

2. All other conditions of release are adopted in full.

3. A hearing is set on the Notice of Appeal of the Magistrate Court's Release Order

(Doc # 9) for August 11, 2006 at 10:00 a.m. at the United States Courthouse, One Church

Street, Courtroom 2A, Montgomery, Alabama.

DONE this the 4th day of August, 2006.

 /s/ Mark E. Fuller 

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cr-00193-MEF-CSC Document 12 Filed 08/04/2006 Page 1 of 1
Editorial Note on Part 26
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 26 appear at 87 FR 71455, Nov. 22, 2022.

§ 26.139 Reporting initial validity and drug test results. ( a ) The licensee testing facility shall report as negative all specimens that are valid on the basis of validity screening or initial validity tests, or both, and are negative on the initial tests for drugs and drug metabolites. Except as permitted under § 26.75(h), positive test results from initial drug tests at the licensee testing facility may not be reported to licensee or other entity management. In addition, the licensee testing facility may not report results from validity screening or initial validity testing indicating that a specimen is of questionable validity or positive initial drug test results from specimens that are of questionable validity.
( b ) Except as provided in §§ 26.37 and 26.75(h), access to the results of initial tests must be limited to the licensee testing facility's staff, the MRO and MRO staff, the FFD program manager, and, when appropriate, EAP staff and the SAE.
( c ) The licensee testing facility shall provide qualified personnel, when required, to testify in an administrative or disciplinary proceeding against an individual when that proceeding is based on urinalysis results reported by the licensee testing facility.
( d ) The licensee testing facility shall prepare the information required for the annual report to the NRC, as required in § 26.717.
( e ) The data in the annual report to the NRC must be presented for either the cutoff levels specified in this part, or for more stringent cutoff levels, if the FFD program uses more stringent cutoff levels for drugs and drug metabolites. If the FFD program tests for drugs and drug metabolites that are not specified in § 26.31(d)(1), the summary must also include the number of positive test results and the cutoff levels used for those drugs and drug metabolites.
( f ) The designated FFD program official shall use the available information from the licensee testing facility's validity and drug test results, the results of quality control testing performed at the licensee testing facility, and the results from testing the quality control samples that the licensee testing facility submits to the HHS-certified laboratory to evaluate continued testing program effectiveness and detect any local trends in drugs of abuse that may require management action or FFD program adjustments. FFD program adjustments may include, but are not limited to, training enhancements, procedure changes, the expansion of the FFD program's drug panel to include additional drugs to be tested, or changes in the types of assays, validity screening tests, or instruments used.
H. Res. 291

In the House of Representatives, U.S., 

May 24, 2005.

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule 

XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the 

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of 

the bill (H.R. 2419) making appropriations for energy and 

water development for the fiscal year ending September 30, 

2006, and for other purposes. The first reading of the bill 

shall be dispensed with. All points of order against consideration of the bill are waived. General debate shall be confined 

to the bill and shall not exceed one hour equally divided and 

controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of 

the Committee on Appropriations. After general debate the 

bill shall be considered for amendment under the five-minute 

rule. Points of order against provisions in the bill for failure 

to comply with clause 2 of rule XXI are waived except for 

section 104. Where points of order are waived against part 

of a paragraph, points of order against a provision in another 

part of such paragraph may be made only against such provi-
2

•HRES 291 EH 

sion and not against the entire paragraph. During consideration of the bill for amendment, the Chairman of the Committee of the Whole may accord priority in recognition on the 

basis of whether the Member offering an amendment has 

caused it to be printed in the portion of the Congressional 

Record designated for that purpose in clause 8 of rule XVIII. 

Amendments so printed shall be considered as read. When 

the committee rises and reports the bill back to the House 

with a recommendation that the bill do pass, the previous 

question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and 

amendments thereto to final passage without intervening motion except one motion to recommit with or without instructions. 

Attest:

Clerk.
###### Editorial Note on Part 35

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 35 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

#### § 35.2041 Records for procedures for administrations requiring a written directive

A licensee shall retain a copy of the procedures required by § 35.41(a) for the duration of the license.
EXHIBIT 32  CERTIFICATION  I, Leslie J. Kessler, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of PureSafe Water Systems, Inc. (the Registrant), hereby certify that the Form 10-Q of PureSafe Water Systems, Inc. for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2014 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.   Date:  March 27, 2015/s/ Leslie J. KesslerLeslie J. KesslerChief Executive Officer and
Principal Financial Officer
§ 917.41 Issuance of regulations. ( a ) The Secretary shall regulate, in the manner specified in this section, the handling of any variety or varieties of fruit whenever he finds, from the recommendations and information submitted by the commodity committee, or from other available information, that such regulations will tend to effectuate the declared policy of the act. Such regulations may: ( 1 ) Limit, during any period or periods, the total quantity of any grade, size, quality, maturity, or pack, or any combination thereof, of any variety or varieties of fruit;
( 2 ) Limit the shipment of any variety or varieties of fruit by establishing, in terms of grades, sizes, or both, minimum standards of quality and maturity during any period when season average prices are expected to exceed the parity level;
( 3 ) Fix the size, capacity, weight, dimensions, markings, or pack of the container, or containers, which may be used in the packaging or handling of any fruit.
( b ) The commodity committee shall be informed immediately of any such regulation issued by the Secretary, and the commodity committee shall promptly give notice thereof to handlers.
Effective Date Note
Effective Date Note: At 76 FR 66605, Oct. 27, 2011, § 917.41 was suspended indefinitely, effective Oct. 28, 2011.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

N. D. HORTON, JR., et al., )

 )

Appellants. )

 )

vs. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:06cv746-WHA

 )

J. LESTER ALEXANDER, III, )

 )

Appellee. )

ORDER

This case is hereby set for oral argument on the appeal from the United States

Bankruptcy Court for the Middle District of Alabama on Wednesday, November 15, 2006, at

10:00 a.m. in District Courtroom 2-C, Frank M. Johnson, Jr. United States Courthouse Complex,

One Church Street, Montgomery, Alabama.

DONE this 4th day of October, 2006.

 /s/ W. Harold Albritton 

W. HAROLD ALBRITTON

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00746-WHA Document 9 Filed 10/04/2006 Page 1 of 1
2007-1934.

#### Ohio Consumers’ Counsel v. Pub. Util. Comm.

Public Utilities Commission, No. 07-259-TP-BLS. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio. Upon consideration of the motion to intervene of AT&T Ohio,

It is ordered by the court that the motion is granted.