alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
13.003 Policy.

(e)(1) All items are candidates for automated solicitation, except that acquisitions for services, for

non-NSN items, and for requirements bought using delivery orders against indefinite-delivery

contracts are excluded. The criteria for exclusion of items for automated evaluation or award are

included in the functional specifications and managed through automated procurement system

internal controls. The Procurement Process Owner is the approval authority for system changes to

the automated procurement exclusion capabilities. The HCA is the approval authority for exclusions

for individual purchase requests or materials from automated solicitation, evaluation, or award for

each supply chain. Individual purchase request or material exclusions will be recorded with a reason

for exclusion and reported monthly to DLA Acquisition Programs by each procuring organization.

The HCA must provide the determination to the DLA Acquisition Procurement Process and Systems

Division Chief for entry into the automated system.

(S-90) See 18.270 for thresholds associated with emergency acquisition flexibilities.

Parent topic: PART 13 – SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION PROCEDURES
PGI 209.405 Effect of listing.       (1) Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) responsibilities under Executive Order 11738, Providing for Administration of the Clean Air Act and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act With Respect to Federal Contracts, Grants, or Loans, have been delegated to the EPA Suspending and Debarring Official (EPA SDO).          (i) Submit notifications and reports required by DFARS 209.405(b) to the EPA SDO at the following address:          Office of Grants and Debarments          U.S. Environmental Protection Agency          Ariel Rios Building          1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW          Washington, DC 20640          Telephone: 202-564-5399          (ii) Unless agency procedures specify otherwise, coordinate submissions to the EPA SDO through the applicable agency suspending and debarring official.          (2) Executive Order 11738 is available at http://www.epa.gov/isdc/eo11738.htm.          (3) Contracting officers are required to review the System for Award Management (SAM) Exclusions twice, once after opening of bids/receipt of proposals (FAR 9.405(d)(1)) and again immediately prior to award (FAR 9.405(d)(4)). The contracting officer shall document the contract file for both searches; the documentation may include a copy of the SAM Exclusions search results.    **Parent topic:** PGI 209.4 -DEBARMENT, SUSPENSION, AND INELIGIBILITY
EXHIBIT 32



Certification

Pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)



Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of FNB Corp., a North Carolina corporation (the Corporation), does hereby certify that:



The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 (the
Form 10-Q) of the Corporation fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all materials respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Corporation.



|      |  |                 | 
|----- |  | --------------- | 
|Date: |  | August 18, 2003 | 
|      |  |                 | 
|      |  |                 | 
|Date: |  | August 18, 2003 | 
|      |  |                 | 



The foregoing
certification is being furnished solely pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate
disclosure document.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANTTO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of SEDONA Corporation on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Quarterly Report"), I, Anita M. Primo, Chief Financial Officer of SEDONA Corporation certify, pursuant Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of SEDONA Corporation.

| Dated: August 10, 2004 | /s/ ANITA M. PRIMO                                |
|------------------------|---------------------------------------------------|
|                   | Vice President and Chief        Financial Officer |
|                   | (Principal Financial Officer)                     |

21

----
# Sustainable Futures

Summary Assessment

Using

P2 Framework Models

Chemical Assessed:

ECOSURF LF (Alcohols C 11 

## -C 15 

## , secondary; alkoxylated)

CAS Registry Number:

1022990-65-3

Participant Name: The Dow Chemical Company Midland, Michigan USA

Date of Assessment:

17 August 2010 This document was de veloped to help compile estimation results from U.S. EPA OPPT’s P2

Framework Models www.epa.gov/oppt/p2framework/ and is used by OPPT during Sustainable Futures (SF) training described at www.epa.gov/opptintr/newchem s/su stainablefutures.htm

. Participants in the voluntary SF Pilot Project are asked to submit the information contained in this assessment along with their SF PMNs in their choice of format. Use of this specific format is not mandatory.2345678121314
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES 

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

SANDI PHILLIPS and RONALD J. ) 

PHILLIPS, ) 

 ) 

Plaintiffs, ) 

 ) 

vs. ) CASE NO. 3:06cv0744-SRW 

 ) 

ST. PAUL TRAVELERS ) 

INSURANCE COMPANY, ) 

 ) 

Defendant. ) 

PLAINTIFFS’ JURY DEMAND

Come now the Plaintiffs in the above styled cause and demand trial 

upon their Complaint by struck jury. 

 /s/James R. McKoon, Jr. 

 ______________________________ 

 JAMES R. McKOON, JR. (MCK020) 

 McKoon & Thomas 

 Attorney for Plaintiffs 

 P. O. Box 3220 

 Phenix City, AL 36868-3220 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 3:06-cv-00744-SRW Document 4 Filed 09/11/2006 Page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that I have served the above and foregoing upon the 

following attorneys of record by electronic noticing procedures set forth by 

this Court as set forth below: 

 

Brenen G. Ely, Esq. 

Joel S. Isenberg, Esq. 

Smith & Ely, LLP 

2000A SouthBridge Parkway 

Suite 405 

Birmingham, Alabama 35209 

This 11th day September, 2006. 

 /s/James R. McKoon, Jr. 

 ____________________________ 

 OF COUNSEL 

PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com

Case 3:06-cv-00744-SRW Document 4 Filed 09/11/2006 Page 2 of 2
§ 455.3 Administration of grants. Grants provided under this part shall comply with applicable law, regulation, or procedure including, without limitation, the requirements of: ( a ) The DOE Financial Assistance Rules (10 CFR part 600 as amended) except as otherwise provided in this rule;
( b ) Executive Order 12372 entitled “Intergovernmental Review of Federal Programs” (48 FR 3130, January 24, 1983; 3 CFR, 1982 Comp., p. 197) and the DOE regulation implementing this Executive Order entitled “Intergovernmental Review of Department of Energy Programs and Activities” (10 CFR part 1005);
( c ) Office of Management and Budget Circular A-97 entitled “Rules and Regulations Permitting Federal Agencies to Provide Specified or Technical Services to State and Local Units of Government under title III of the Inter-Governmental Coordination Act of 1968” available from the Office of Management and Budget, Office of Publication Services, 725 17th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20503;
( d ) DOE regulation entitled “Nondiscrimination in Federally Assisted Programs” (10 CFR part 1040) which implements the following public laws: Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964; section 16 of the Federal Energy Administration Act of 1974; section 401 of the Energy Reorganization Act of 1974; title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972; The Age Discrimination Act of 1975; and section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973; and
( e ) Such other procedures applicable to this part as DOE may from time to time prescribe for the administration of financial assistance.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Richie Simmons, Also Known as Michael Washington, Appellant.

[815 NYS2d 484]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Cotter, J.), rendered July 20, 2004, convicting him of burglary in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and sentencing him to a determinate term of 25 years’ *1025imprisonment. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of those branches of the defendant’s omnibus motion which were to suppress physical evidence and to suppress identification testimony.

Ordered that the judgment is modified, on the law and as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by reducing the sentence to a determinate term of 15 years’ imprisonment; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant failed to preserve for appellate review his contention that the sentence imposed by the County Court improperly penalized him for exercising his right to a jury trial, because he did not set forth the issue on the record at the time of sentencing *(see People v Hurley,*75 NY2d 887 [1990]; *People v Robinson,*287 AD2d 582, 582-583 [2001]). However, we reach the issue in the interest of justice *(see People v Clark,*6 AD3d 1066 [2004]; *see also People v Martin,*4 AD3d 537 [2004]).

The defendant, who has no prior felony convictions and no history of violent crime, was offered a sentence of a determinate term of 8 years’ imprisonment as part of a plea bargain. His more culpable codefendant pleaded guilty to robbery in the first degree and burglary in the first degree, and was sentenced to a determinate term of 15 years’ imprisonment. Under the circumstances, the sentence of 25 years’ imprisonment raises the inference that the defendant was penalized for exercising his right to a jury trial *(see People v Morton,*288 AD2d 557 [2001], *cert denied*537 US 860 [2002]; *People v Cosme,*203 AD2d 375 [1994]; *People v Peterson,*126 AD2d 680 [1987]; *People v Patterson,*106 AD2d 520 [1984]). Accordingly, the defendant’s sentence should be reduced to a determinate term of 15 years’ imprisonment.

The defendant was not denied his right to effective assistance of counsel *(see People v Benevento,*91 NY2d 708 [1998]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions, that the police lacked probable cause for his arrest and that the showup identifications were unduly suggestive, are without merit. Miller, J.P., Luciano, Lifson and Covello, JJ., concur.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                            214,330     
<SECURITIES>                                            0           
<RECEIVABLES>                                      19,056      
<ALLOWANCES>                                            0                
<INVENTORY>                                             0                
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                1,298,007        
<PP&E>                                                  0                
<DEPRECIATION>                                          0                
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  1,789,205        
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              29,113           
<BONDS>                                                 0                
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                             0                
<COMMON>                                       87,477,847       
<OTHER-SE>                                              0                
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    1,789,205        
<SALES>                                                 0                
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  115,396          
<CGS>                                                   0                
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     185,566          
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        0                
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0                
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                      0                
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (70,170)         
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0                
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (70,170)         
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0                
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0                
<CHANGES>                                               0                
<NET-INCOME>                                      (70,170)         
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                           0                
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           0                
        


</TABLE>
Case 2:06-cv-00767-MEF-SRW Document 6 Filed 09/11/2006 Page 1 of 12
Case 2:06-cv-00767-MEF-SRW Document 6 Filed 09/11/2006 Page 2 of 12
Case 2:06-cv-00767-MEF-SRW Document 6 Filed 09/11/2006 Page 3 of 12
Case 2:06-cv-00767-MEF-SRW Document 6 Filed 09/11/2006 Page 4 of 12
Case 2:06-cv-00767-MEF-SRW Document 6 Filed 09/11/2006 Page 5 of 12
Case 2:06-cv-00767-MEF-SRW Document 6 Filed 09/11/2006 Page 6 of 12
Case 2:06-cv-00767-MEF-SRW Document 6 Filed 09/11/2006 Page 7 of 12
Case 2:06-cv-00767-MEF-SRW Document 6 Filed 09/11/2006 Page 8 of 12
Case 2:06-cv-00767-MEF-SRW Document 6 Filed 09/11/2006 Page 9 of 12
Case 2:06-cv-00767-MEF-SRW Document 6 Filed 09/11/2006 Page 10 of 12
Case 2:06-cv-00767-MEF-SRW Document 6 Filed 09/11/2006 Page 11 of 12
Case 2:06-cv-00767-MEF-SRW Document 6 Filed 09/11/2006 Page 12 of 12
Editorial Note on Part 420
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 420 appear at 64 FR 46114, Aug. 24, 1999.

§ 420.3 Administration of financial assistance. ( a ) Financial assistance under this part shall comply with applicable laws and regulations including, but without limitation, the requirements of: ( 1 ) Executive Order 12372, Intergovernmental Review of Federal Programs, as implemented by 10 CFR part 1005.
( 2 ) DOE Financial Assistance Rules (10 CFR part 600); and
( 3 ) Other procedures which DOE may from time to time prescribe for the administration of financial assistance under this part.
( b ) The budget period(s) covered by the financial assistance provided to a State according to § 420.11(b) or § 420.33 shall be consistent with 10 CFR part 600.
( c ) Subawards are authorized under this part and are subject to the requirements of this part and 10 CFR part 600.
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 17

- 5188

_____________________________
D OW R OOFING S YSTEMS , LLC
, Appellant,

v.

M ARCUS P OINTE B APTIST C HURCH , I NC

. , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County

. Edward P. Nickinson, III , Judge

. July 25, 2018

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

. W OLF , L EWIS , and R AY , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Matthew J. Conigliaro of Carlton Fields Jorden Burt, P.A., Tampa; Matthew B. Barr of Barnes & Thornburg LLP, Indianapolis
, for Appellant.

Edward P. Fleming and Matthew A. Bush of McDonald Fleming Moorhead, Pensacola, for Appellee.
ZB, N.A. dba CALIFORNIA BANK & TRUST (who also does


business as California Bank & Trust, a division of ZB), successor


by merger to California Bank & Trust (herein called "Bank")


(Herein called "Bank")












FIRST NOTE REVISION AGREEMENT







	
ORIGINAL NOTE INFORMATION

	
AMOUNT


 

	
NOTE DATE

	
CURRENT MATURITY DATE


	
$35,000,000.00


 

	
June 5, 2017

	
March 1, 2018









               This Agreement is effective as of:  February 28, 2018.


ORIGINAL OBLIGATION:


This Agreement refers to the loan evidenced by the above Second Amended and Restated Master Revolving Note dated June 5, 2017 in favor of Bank executed by OWENS REALTY MORTGAGE, INC., a Maryland corporation ("Borrower"), in the original principal amount of $35,000,000, payable in full on March 1, 2018.


CURRENT OBLIGATION:


The unpaid outstanding principal balance of said Note as of the beginning of the day on February 23, 2018 is $5,587,026.67.


REVISION:


The undersigned Borrower hereby requests Bank to revise the terms of said Note, in the following manner:  The Maturity Date of the Note is changed from "March 1, 2018" to "June 1, 2018".


              In consideration of Bank's acceptance of the revision of said Note, all as set forth above, the Borrower does hereby acknowledge and admit to such indebtedness, and further does unconditionally agree to pay such indebtedness together with interest thereon within the time and in the manner as revised in accordance with the foregoing, together with any and all attorney's fees and cost of collection.


This Agreement is a revision only, and not a novation; and except as herein provided, all of the terms and conditions of said Note and all related documents shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect.







	
 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


The foregoing is accepted.


 


ZB, N.A. dba CALIFORNIA BANK & TRUST


(who also does business as California Bank & Trust,


a division of ZB), successor by merger to California


Bank & Trust


 


 


By: /s/ Tom Paton

 Name: Thomas C. Paton, Jr.


Title: Senior Vice President & Manager

  

	
OWENS REALTY MORTGAGE, INC.,

a Maryland corporation

  


By:  /s/ Bryan H. Draper

         Bryan H. Draper, President and

     Chief Executive Officer
SERVED: March 13, 2017 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

ot.Pl\RiME~~i?J . 1R~ S?OR' 

In The Matter Of: ) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

lU\1 1-\~R \ S p \2: ~ 3 

OOCK£.1 OPE.Rf.l.l \0 IS 

Docket No. FAA-2016-4268 

Peter Hantz Company 

Case No. 2012S0700041 

Respondent 

ORDER GRANTING RESPONDENT'S SECOND UNOPPOSED 

REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE RESPONSE TO 

COMPLAINANT'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT 

On January 31 , 2017, the Complainant filed a Motion for Partial Summary Judgement. 

On February 15, 201 7, the Respondent filed an unopposed request to extend the deadline for 

filing a response to Complainant's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment to March 15, 2017. 

On February 16, 2017, the request was granted. 

On March 8, 201 7, the Respondent filed a unopposed request to again extend the deadline for 

filing a response to Complainant's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, this time to March 29, 

2017, in order to allow the parties to finalize settlement discussions. 

Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. §§ 13.205(a)(6) and 13.213(b), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 

1. The Respondent's unopposed request is granted. 

2. The Respondent's response to the Complainant's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment 

shall be filed by March 29, 2017. 

Attachment: Service List 

DOUGLAS M. RAW 

--ALD 

Administrative Law Judge 
SERVICE LIST - BY U.S. MAIL 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1 0001 

ONE COPY 

Timothy I. McCulloch, Respondent's Counsel 

HINSHAW & CULBERTSON LLP 

2375 E. Camelback Rd. 

Suite 750 

Phoenix, AZ 85016 

TEL: 602-631-4400 

FAX: 602-631-4404 

Ryan Landers, Complainant's Counsel 

Enforcement Division, Southern Team 

Federal Aviation Administration, Southern Region 

1701 Columbia A venue 

College Park, GA 30337 

TEL: 404-305-5200 

FAX: 404-305-5223 

The Honorable Douglas M. Rawald, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200·New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-5121 Staff Assistant 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

Docket No. FAA-2016-4268 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
#### HURD, Respondent, v. GREENLAWN CEMETERY ASS’N et al., Appellants.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

June 26, 1914.)

Action by George B. Hurd, in his own behalf, etc., against the Greenlawn Cemetery Association and others.

E. J. Myers, of New York City, for appellants.

J. M. Gardner, of New York City, for respondent.

No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs. Order filed. See, also, 148 N. Y. Supp. 1122.
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED DE CEMBER 11, 2014

NO. 03

- 14

- 00211

- CV

PM Management

- Killeen III NC, LLC d/b/a Hill Country Rehab and Nursing Center;

and Trisun Healthcare, LLC, Appellant s

v.

Georgia Kielman, Appe llee

APPEAL FROM 169TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE JONES, JUSTICES ROSE AND GO ODWIN

DISMISSED ON APPELLANT S ’ MOTION

-- OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE JONES

This is an appeal from the order signed by the tr i a l court on March 14, 2014. Appellants have

filed a motion to dismiss the appeal, and having considered the motion, the Court agrees that the

motion should be granted. Therefore, the Court grants the motion and dismisses the appeal

. The

appellant s shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and the court below.
# PGI Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation

- PGI Part 213 - SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITIONPROCEDURES 
- PGI Part 215 - CONTRACTING BY NEGOTIATION 
- PGI Part 216 - TYPES OF CONTRACTS 
- PGI Part 217 - SPECIAL CONTRACTING METHODS 
- PGI Part 218 - EMERGENCY ACQUISITIONS 

**Parent topic:**PGI Subchapter C - CONTRACTING METHODS AND CONTRACT TYPES
Subpart 330.2 - CAS Program Requirements

Parent topic: PART 330 - COST ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

330.201 Contract requirements.

330.201-5 Waiver.

The Senior Procurement Executive (SPE) shall exercise the waiver authority under Federal

Acquisition Regulation 30.201-5(a)(2). Operating Divisions and Staff Divisions shall forward waiver

requests to the SPE.
###### Editorial Note on Part 26

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 26 appear at 87 FR 71455, Nov. 22, 2022.

#### § 26.155 [Reserved]