alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
835.001-70 Veterans Affairs (VA) definitions.       *Research* means a systematic investigation, including research development, testing and evaluation, designed to develop or contribute to generalized knowledge.          *Research impropriety* refers to noncompliance with the laws, regulations, and policies regarding human subject protections, laboratory animal welfare, research safety, research laboratory security, research information security, and research misconduct. It does not encompass improper procedures or conduct in areas outside of the mandate of the Office of Research Oversight (ORO) (*e.g.,* waste, fraud, abuse, or fiscal mismanagement).          *Research misconduct* means fabrication, falsification, or plagiarism in proposing, performing, or reviewing research, or in reporting research results.          *VA facility* means a component of the VA national health care system, such as a VA Medical Center, VA Health Care System, or VA Medical and Regional Office Center.    **Parent topic:** PART 835 - RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CONTRACTING
§ 455.102 Energy conservation measure cost-share credit. To the extent a State provides in its State Plan, DOE may wholly or partially credit the costs of the following, with respect to a building, toward the required cost-share for an energy conservation measure grant in that building: ( a ) A non-Federally funded technical assistance program;
( b ) A non-Federally funded technical assistance program update to comply with § 455.20(q); and
( c ) The non-Federally funded implementation of one or more energy conservation measures, which complies with the eligibility criteria set forth in § 455.71.
# Materials Not Included in **Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket**

Docket Number: FAA - 2014 - 0619 Directorate Identifier: 2014NM029AD

J41 - 24 - 043 --- 9/27/11 J41 - 24 - 043, R1 --- 1/16/12 J41 - 24 - 043, R2 --- 8/21/13

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket



### MA **Y BE VIEWED AT:** Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate Rules Docket 1601 Lind Ave. SW., Renton, WA 98057 425.227.1221 **DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Form Date: 0 3/05/2008
§ 429.7 Confidentiality. ( a ) The following records are not exempt from public disclosure: Product or equipment type; product or equipment class; private labeler name; brand name; applicable model number(s) unless that information meets the criteria specified in paragraph (b) of this section; energy or water ratings submitted by manufacturers to DOE pursuant to § 429.12(b)(13); whether the certification was based on a test procedure waiver and the date of such waiver; and whether the certification was based on exception relief from the Office of Hearing and Appeals and the date of such relief.
( b ) An individual, manufacturer model number is public information unless: ( 1 ) The individual, manufacturer model number is a unique model number of a commercial packaged boiler, commercial water heating equipment, commercial HVAC equipment or commercial refrigeration equipment that was developed for an individual customer,
( 2 ) The individual, manufacturer model number is not displayed on product literature, and
( 3 ) Disclosure of the individual, manufacturer model number would reveal confidential business information as described at § 1004.11 of this title—in which case, under these limited circumstances, a manufacturer may identify the individual manufacturer model number as a private model number on a certification report submitted pursuant to § 429.12(b)(6).
( c ) Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 1004.11(e), any person submitting information or data which the person believes to be confidential and exempt by law from public disclosure should—at the time of submission—submit: ( 1 ) One complete copy, and one copy from which the information believed to be confidential has been deleted.
( 2 ) A request for confidentiality containing the submitter's views on the reasons for withholding the information from disclosure, including: ( i ) A description of the items sought to be withheld from public disclosure,
( ii ) Whether and why such items are customarily treated as confidential within the industry,
( iii ) Whether the information is generally known by or available from other sources,
( iv ) Whether the information has previously been made available to others without obligation concerning its confidentiality,
( v ) An explanation of the competitive injury to the submitting person which would result from public disclosure,
( vi ) A date upon which such information might lose its confidential nature due to the passage of time, and
( vii ) Why disclosure of the information would be contrary to the public interest.
( d ) In accordance with the procedures established in 10 CFR 1004.11(e), DOE shall make its own determination with regard to any claim that information submitted be exempt from public disclosure.
[76 FR 12451, Mar. 7, 2011, as amended at 79 FR 25499, May 5, 2014; 80 FR 151, Jan. 5, 2015]
352.270-13 Continued Ban on Funding

Abortion and Continued Ban on Funding of

Human Embryo Research.

As prescribed in HHSAR 370.304(e), the Contracting Officer shall insert the following clause:

Continued Ban on Funding Abortion and Continued Ban on Funding of Human Embryo Research

(DEC 2015)

(a) The Contractor shall not use any funds obligated under this contract for any abortion.

(b) The Contractor shall not use any funds obligated under this contract for the following:

(1) The creation of a human embryo or embryos for research purposes; or

(2) Research in which a human embryo or embryos are destroyed, discarded, or knowingly subjected

to risk of injury of death greater than that allowed for research on fetuses in utero under 45 CFR

part 46 and Section 498(b) of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 289g(b)).

(c) The term “human embryo or embryos” includes any organism, not protected as a human subject

under 45 CFR part 46 as of the date of the enactment of this Act, that is derived by fertilization,

parthenogenesis, cloning, or any other means from one or more human gametes of human diploid

cells.

(d) The Contractor shall not use any Federal funds for the cloning of human beings.

(End of clause)

Parent topic: Subpart 352.2 - Texts of Provisions and Clauses
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 307 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 307

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                          June 8, 2005.
    Resolved, That the following named Members be, and are hereby, elected to 
the following standing committees of the House of Representatives:
    Committee on the Judiciary: Ms. Wasserman Schultz.
    Committee on Science: Mr. Moore of Kansas.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
#### § 455.90 Purpose.

This subpart describes what constitutes a State program for technical assistance, program assistance, and marketing that may receive financial assistance under this part and sets forth the eligibility criteria for States to receive grants for technical assistance, program assistance, and marketing.
#### § 1009.6 Dissemination of prices and charges.

Current prices and charges for specific materials and services are available from the DOE laboratory or office providing the material or service, or from the responsible program office. If this office cannot be determined, inquiries regarding the appropriate contact office should be addressed to the Office, of Finance and Accounting, Product Accounting and Pricing Branch, Mail Station 4A-139, 1000 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20585.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                               5
<LEGEND>
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                          0000764763
<NAME>                         @ebs, inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                            1
<CURRENCY>                            USD

<S>                                   <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                 APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                   JUN-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                         1
<CASH>                            786,208
<SECURITIES>                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                     999,360
<ALLOWANCES>                      (96,187)
<INVENTORY>                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                1,831,745
<PP&E>                          1,302,757
<DEPRECIATION>                   (890,512)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  4,666,210
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           2,278,456
<BONDS>                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                     2,057,173
<COMMON>                           13,610
<OTHER-SE>                     (1,270,029)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    4,666,210
<SALES>                         1,799,758
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                1,799,758
<CGS>                             984,029
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   2,166,372
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                 56,865
<INCOME-PRETAX>                  (423,479)
<INCOME-TAX>                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>              (423,479)
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                     (423,479)
<EPS-BASIC>                        (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                        (.03)


</TABLE>
1505.000 Scope of part.

This part provides instructions on publicizing contract opportunities and response time, instructions

on information to include in the synopses of proposed contracts, instructions on publicizing orders

under GSA schedule contracts, policy references relative to release of information, and procedures

for obtaining information on previous Government contracts.

Parent topic: PART 1505 - PUBLICIZING CONTRACT ACTIONS
#### The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v John Boyd, Respondent.

— Appeal by the People from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated March 17, 1980, which, upon defendant’s motion, dismissed the indictment for lack of a speedy trial. Order reversed, on the law, motion denied, indictment reinstated and matter remitted to Criminal Term for an immediate disposition. Criminal Term erred in not excluding the period from April 10, 1979 to September 27, 1979 from the computation of the six-month time period (see CPL 30.30, subd 4). If this period of time is excluded from the computation, it becomes apparent that the defendant’s motion pursuant to CPL 30.30 (subd 1) should have been denied. Additionally, we reject the court’s determination that defendant’s constitutional *544right to a speedy trial had been violated (see *People v Taranovich,*37 NY2d 442). Titone, J. P., Lazer, Gulotta and Martuscello, JJ., concur.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION

SOUTHEASTERN BOLL WEEVIL )

ERADICATION FOUNDATION, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

v. ) 2:06cv756-MHT

) 

BOLL WEEVIL ERADICATION )

FOUNDATION OF GEORGIA, )

INC., and TOMMY IRVIN, in )

his capacity as Trustee )

of Boll Weevil Eradication )

Foundation of Georgia, )

Inc., )

)

Defendants. )

ORDER

The allegations of the plaintiff's complaint are

insufficient to invoke this court's jurisdiction under 28

U.S.C. § 1332. To invoke jurisdiction based on

diversity, a complaint must distinctly and affirmatively

alleged each party's citizenship. McGovern v. American

Case 2:06-cv-00756-MHT-WC Document 6 Filed 09/12/2006 Page 1 of 3
* In Bonner v. Prichard, 661 F.2d 1206, 1209 (11th

Cir. 1981) (en banc), the Eleventh Circuit Court of

Appeals adopted as binding precedent all of the decisions

of the former Fifth Circuit handed down prior to the

close of business on September 30, 1981.

Airlines, Inc., 511 F. 2d 653, 654 (5th Cir. 1975) (per

curiam).*

 

28 U.S.C. § 1332(c) provides that a corporation shall

be deemed a citizen, first, of all States by which it has

been incorporated and, second, of the State where it has

its principal place of business. To invoke jurisdiction

based on diversity in a case in which a corporation is a

party, it is thus necessary to allege distinctly and

affirmatively all the States by which the corporation has

been incorporated and the State in which the corporation

has its principal place of business. American Motorists

Ins. Co. v. American Employers' Ins. Co., 600 F.2d 15, 16

and n.1 (5th Cir. 1979) (per curiam). The plaintiff's

complaint fails to allege sufficiently the citizenship of

corporate plaintiff Southeastern Boll Weevil Eradication

Foundation and corporate defendant Boll Weevil

Eradication Foundation of Georgia, Inc.

Case 2:06-cv-00756-MHT-WC Document 6 Filed 09/12/2006 Page 2 of 3
In addition, the plaintiff's complaint fails to meet

§ 1332's requirements because the complaint gives the

"residence" rather than the "citizenship" of plaintiff

Tommy Irvin. An allegation that a party is a "resident"

of a State is not sufficient to establish that a party is

a "citizen" of that State. Delome v. Union Barge Line

Co., 444 F.2d 225, 233 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S.

995 (1971).

It is therefore the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of

the court that the plaintiff has until September 25,

2006, to amend the complaint to allege § 1332

jurisdiction sufficiently, see 28 U.S.C. § 1653;

otherwise, this cause shall be dismissed without

prejudice.

DONE, this the 12th day of September, 2006.

 /s/ Myron H. Thompson 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00756-MHT-WC Document 6 Filed 09/12/2006 Page 3 of 3
§ 455.92 State technical assistance awards. Technical assistance awards by States under this subpart are subject to all requirements of this part which apply to DOE-awarded technical assistance program grants except that States: ( a ) Are not required to award the funds in grant instruments;
( b ) May award the funds throughout the fiscal year subject to § 455.144(a)(3); and
( c ) Are not required to rank applications under § 455.131(b) of this part.
U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations 

West Building Ground Floor, Room w12-140 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, DC 20590 

Application to Amend 

Section 333 Exemption No. 11306 

Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2014-1023 

October 14, 2015 

Petitioner: 

Hawk Aerial, LLC 

Kevin J. Gould, CEO 

114 Homesteads Rd. 

Placitas, NM 87043 

Cell: 425-218-3723 

Email: kevin.gould@hawkaerial.com 

Website: www.hawkaerial.com 

Greetings, 

By letter from the FM dated April8, 2015, an exemption was granted to Hawk Aerial for relief under Section 

333. That letter was marked Section 333 Exemption No. 11306 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2014-1023. 

Hawk Aerial hereby requests that the exemption so granted be amended to include the Airborne Robotics 

GmbH AIR6 model: 

• The AIR6 is an "flat-6" multi-rotor unmanned aircraft (UA), an electric vertical takeoff and landing 

(VTOL) platform with a maximum gross weight of 5750 grams (12.7 pounds), diagonal width 

dimension of 91 em and aircraft height of 43 em. 

• It uses GPS for navigational guidance. 

• In the event of a loss of communication link, the AIR6 automatically returns to home and lands. 

• In the event of flight beyond range, the AIR6's flight termination system automatically returns the 

aircraft home and lands. 

• The findings, rationale and conclusions contained in the FAA's Exemption No. 11306 apply without 

modification to this application to include the Airborne Robotics AIR6 model in Exemption No. 11306. 

Copies of the Aircraft Flight Manual and Users Guide have been mailed to the FM at the cc address shown 

below. 

Thank you for your consideration of this important request. Please advise us of any additional information 

that is required. 

cc: AlTN: The Office of Rulemaking 

FAA Headquarters, Building lOA 

800 Independence Avenue, SW 

Washington, DC 20951
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of the Company
on Form 10-K for the period ended June 30, 2016 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
I, Philip L. Hurst, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title
18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                                         
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company at the dates and for the periods indicated.



Date: October 27, 2016





|By:                                          | /s/ Philip L. Hurst | 
|-------------------------------------------- | ------------------- | 
|Name: Philip L. Hurst                        |                    
|Title: President and Chief Executive Officer |
(logo)Rialto 

         CAPITAL

** **

 

**2017 AnnualStatement of Servicer Compliance (Item 1123)**

 

Poolingand Servicing Agreement (the “Pooling and Servicing Agreement”) dated as ofDecember 1, 2012 by and among J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage SecuritiesCorp., as Depositor, Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, NationalAssociation as Master Servicer, Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC as SpecialServicer, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association as Certificate Administrator,Wells Fargo Bank, National Association as Trustee and Pentalpha SurveillanceLLC as Senior Trust Advisor relating to the J.P. Morgan Chase CommercialMortgage Securities Trust 2012-LC9, Commercial Mortgage Pass-ThroughCertificates, Series 2012-LC9 

**(JPMCC2012-LC9)**

 

 

Theundersigned, a duly authorized officer of Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, asspecial servicer (the “Special Servicer”) herein certifies to the following:

 

1.       Allservicing activities and performance of such servicing activities under the Poolingand Servicing Agreement are performed on behalf of the Special Servicer.

 

2.       Areview of the servicing activities and performance by the Special Servicer forthe period of January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2017 (the “Reporting Period”) inaccordance with the Pooling and Servicing Agreement has been conducted under mysupervision.

 

3.       Tothe best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Special Servicer hasfulfilled all of its obligations under the terms of the Pooling and ServicingAgreement, in all material respects for the Reporting Period and if there hasbeen a failure to fulfill any such obligations in any material respect, eachfailure and the nature and status thereof has been specifically identifiedherein.

 

 

Certifiedby: /s/ AdamSinger                                                                Date:March 1, 2018

 

AdamSinger, Managing Director
Exhibit No. 12.

Questar Pipeline Company and Subsidiaries
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                12 months ended June 30,
                                                    1998        1999
                                                (Dollars in Thousands)
<S>                                             <C>         <C>
Earnings

Income before income taxes                          $45,084     $43,782
Plus debt expense                                    13,805      15,737
Plus allowance for borrowed
   funds used during construction                       317       1,821
Plus interest portion of rental expense                 275         285
                                                    $59,481     $61,625

Fixed Charges

Debt expense                                        $13,805     $15,737
Plus allowance for borrowed
   funds used during construction                       317       1,821
Plus interest portion of rental expense                 275         285
                                                    $14,397     $17,843

Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges                     4.13        3.45
</TABLE>
###### Editorial Note on Part 40

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 40 appear at 79 FR 75740, Dec. 19, 2014.

#### § 40.44 Amendment of licenses at request of licensee.

Applications for amendment of a license shall be filed on NRC Form 313 in accordance with § 40.31 and shall specify the respects in which the licensee desires the license to be amended and the grounds for such amendment.

[49 FR 19627, May 9, 1984, as amended at 56 FR 40768, Aug. 16, 1991]
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

BARBARA B. FREEMAN, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:06cv794-SRW

)

MICHAEL ASTRUE, )

Commissioner of Social Security, )

)

Defendant. )

ORDER

Plaintiff brought the present action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) seeking judicial

review of a decision by the Commissioner of Social Security denying her benefits under the

Social Security Act. On September 5, 2007, this court reversed the decision of the

Commissioner and remanded the case to the Commissioner for further proceedings pursuant

to sentence four of § 405(g). Plaintiff has filed an application for an award of attorneys fees

under the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1)(A). Plaintiff’s

application seeks fees in the total amount of $4,695.00. The Commissioner does not contest

the petition and requests that this court award fees and expenses in the amount sought by

plaintiff. Upon an independent review of the record, the court concludes that the position

of the Commissioner in this litigation was not substantially justified, and further that the

amount of fees sought by plaintiff is reasonable.

For the foregoing reasons, it is 

ORDERED that the plaintiff’s petition for attorney fees (Doc. # 17) is GRANTED,

Case 3:06-cv-00794-SRW Document 20 Filed 12/17/2007 Page 1 of 2
2

and plaintiff is awarded EAJA fees in the total amount of $4,695.00.

DONE, this 17th day of December, 2007.

/s/ Susan Russ Walker 

SUSAN RUSS WALKER

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-00794-SRW Document 20 Filed 12/17/2007 Page 2 of 2