alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 96 

To amend title 49, United States Code, to direct the Assistant Secretary 

of Homeland Security (Transportation Security Administration) to transfer unclaimed money recovered at airport security checkpoints to nonprofit organizations that provide places of rest and recuperation at airports for members of the Armed Forces and their families, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 3, 2017 

Ms. BROWNLEY of California introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Homeland Security 

A BILL 

To amend title 49, United States Code, to direct the Assistant Secretary of Homeland Security (Transportation Security Administration) to transfer unclaimed money recovered at airport security checkpoints to nonprofit organizations that provide places of rest and recuperation 

at airports for members of the Armed Forces and their 

families, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 96 IH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘TSA Loose Change 

3 Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. DISPOSITION OF UNCLAIMED MONEY RECOVERED 

5 AT AIRPORT SECURITY CHECKPOINTS. 

6 (a) DISPOSITION OF UNCLAIMED MONEY.—Section 

7 44945(a) of title 49, United States Code, is amended— 

8 (1) by inserting ‘‘after the date of enactment of 

9 the TSA Loose Change Act,’’ after ‘‘title 31,’’; 

10 (2) by striking ‘‘shall be retained by the Trans11 portation Security Administration’’ and all that fol12 lows through ‘‘this chapter’’ and inserting ‘‘shall be 

13 annually transferred, based on requests for pro14 posals, by the Assistant Secretary to nonprofit orga15 nizations that operate airport centers in multiple lo16 cations throughout the United States to provide 

17 places of rest and recuperation for members of the 

18 Armed Forces and their families’’; and 

19 (3) by adding at the end the following new sen20 tence: ‘‘The Assistant Secretary shall ensure that 

21 the name of each nonprofit agency to which funds 

22 are transferred under this subsection is printed in 

23 the Federal Register.’’. 

24 (b) ANNUAL REPORT.—Section 515(b) of the De25 partment of Homeland Security Appropriations Act, 2005 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 96 IH

1 (Public Law 108–334; 118 Stat. 1318; 49 U.S.C. 44945 

2 note) is amended— 

3 (1) by striking ‘‘the Committee on Transpor4 tation and Infrastructure of the House of Represent5 atives’’ and inserting ‘‘the Committee on Homeland 

6 Security of the House of Representatives’’; and 

7 (2) by striking ‘‘and specifically how the un8 claimed money is being used to provide civil aviation 

9 security’’ and inserting ‘‘and the amount of un10 claimed money transferred to nonprofit organiza11 tions under section 44945(a) of title 49, United 

12 States Code, and the dates of such transfers’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### Helen Jensen, Appellant, v. City of Chicago, Appellee.

Gen. No. 41,208.

*266opinion filed June 19, 1940.

V. Russell Donaghy, for appellant; David A. Sehallman and Joseph P. Power, of counsel; Barnet Ho des, Corporation Counsel, for appellee; Alexander J. Besa, L. Louis Karton and Louis H. Geiman, Assistant Corporation Counsel, of counsel.

Opinion by

Justice Hebel.

“Not to be published in full.”
Editorial Note on Part 31
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 31 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

§ 31.6 General license to install devices generally licensed in § 31.5. Any person who holds a specific license issued by an Agreement State authorizing the holder to manufacture, install, or service a device described in § 31.5 within such Agreement State is hereby granted a general license to install and service such device in any non-Agreement State and a general license to install and service such device in offshore waters, as defined in § 150.3(f) of this chapter: *Provided,* That: ( a ) [Reserved]
( b ) The device has been manufactured, labeled, installed, and serviced in accordance with applicable provisions of the specific license issued to such person by the Agreement State.
( c ) Such person assures that any labels required to be affixed to the device under regulations of the Agreement State which licensed manufacture of the device bear a statement that removal of the label is prohibited.
[30 FR 8189, June 26, 1965, as amended at 30 FR 10947, Aug. 24, 1965; 39 FR 43533, Dec. 16, 1974; 46 FR 44151, Sept. 3, 1981]
37.270 Acquisition of audit services.

(a) General policy.

(S-90) See 8.003(S-90) for acquisition of audit readiness and/or audit sustainment services.

Parent topic: SUBPART 37.2 – ADVISORY AND ASSISTANCE SERVICES
#### PEOPLE v. KEITEL.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

November 27, 1914.)

Proceeding by the People of the State of New York against Adolph Keitel.

No opinion. Motion to dismiss appeal granted. Order filed.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES 

 FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

 SOUTHERN DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) 

 ) 

 Plaintiff, ) 

 ) 

 v. ) Case No. 1:06-cr-0201-WHA-CSC 

 ) 

OSCAR MARTINEZ-RAMIREZ, ) 

 ) 

 Defendant. ) 

MOTION FOR TRANSLATOR FEES

COMES NOW, the defendant, Oscar Martinez-Ramirez, by and through 

counsel, and moves this Honorable Court to authorize the paid use of a translator to 

assist the defense attorney in his representation of the defendant. 

In support thereof, the following is stated: 

1. Defendant is a Mexican national. 

2. Defendant=s knowledge of English is extremely limited, far below that 

necessary for Defendant and his attorney to discuss defense matters in 

this case. 

3. Defendant=s court-appointed attorney speaks no Spanish. 

4. The Court has a federally certified translator for all in-court matters. 

Said translator lives in Andalusia, Alabama, making it impracticable for 

her to be present at short notice conferences and other meetings between 

Defendant and defense counsel occurring out of Court unless the 

Case 1:06-cr-00201-WHA-CSC Document 44 Filed 02/20/2007 Page 1 of 3
2

translator is already in Montgomery, Alabama. 

WHEREFORE, Defendant respectfully moves this Honorable Court to 

authorize the expenditure of up to $1,000.00 for payment for translation services in 

this case for discussions between Defendant and defense counsel, in out-of-court 

defense preparations and discussions. 

Respectfully submitted this 20th day of February, 2007. 

s/ Richard K. Keith 

RICHARD K. KEITH (KEI003) 

Attorney for Defendant

KEITH & DUBIN, P.C.

22 Scott Street 

Montgomery, AL 36104-4012 

Telephone: (334) 264-6776 

Facsimile: (334) 265-5362 

E-mail: rkk@rkeithlaw.com 

Case 1:06-cr-00201-WHA-CSC Document 44 Filed 02/20/2007 Page 2 of 3
3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on February 20, 2007, I electronically filed the foregoing 

with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system, which will send notification of 

such filing to the following: 

A. Clark Morris, AUSA 

Post Office Box 197 

Montgomery, AL 36101-0197 

s/ Richard K. Keith 

OF COUNSEL

Case 1:06-cr-00201-WHA-CSC Document 44 Filed 02/20/2007 Page 3 of 3
H. Res. 261

In the House of Representatives, U.S., 

October 6, 2005.

Whereas chemotherapy for cancer patients is primarily furnished in physician offices and is therefore subject to the 

revised method for determining payment amounts; 

Whereas in 2005 the Medicare program instituted a demonstration project to assess the quality of care for patients undergoing chemotherapy by collecting data on the 

impact of chemotherapy on cancer patients’ quality of 

life; 

Whereas the demonstration project is a strong effort to improve the quality of cancer treatment by assessing pain, 

nausea and vomiting, and fatigue; 

Whereas the demonstration project reflects a foundation to 

evaluate important patient services moving forward; 

Whereas payment amounts under the demonstration project 

have mitigated the significant reductions in Medicare 

support for chemotherapy services that would otherwise 

have gone into effect; 

Whereas reports by the Department of Health and Human 

Services and the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission 

regarding any adverse effects from the changes in the reimbursement method for chemotherapy services are not 

due until late 2005 and January 1, 2006; 
2

•HRES 261 EH 

Whereas the demonstration project achieves the concurrent 

objectives of collecting data to improve the quality of cancer care and maintaining financial support for cancer 

chemotherapy pending the completion and review of studies on the recent reimbursement changes; 

Whereas it may be possible to modify the demonstration 

project to collect additional or different data elements 

that would make it even more useful in enhancing the 

quality of cancer care; and 

Whereas it is essential that the access of Medicare cancer patients to chemotherapy treatment be maintained and in 

the strong interest of patients that the quality of their 

care be assessed and improved: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives that—

(1) the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services 

should extend through 2006 the Medicare demonstration 

project to assess the quality of care for patients undergoing chemotherapy, and then thoroughly review the 

merits of the demonstration project; 

(2) the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services 

should use the results of this demonstration project to 

develop a system to pay for chemotherapy services under 

Medicare based on the quality of care delivered and the 

resources used to deliver that care, including physician 

performance; 

(3) the demonstration project should be modified to 

accumulate even more useful data relating to the quality 
3

•HRES 261 EH 

of care furnished to Medicare patients with cancer, such 

as the clinical context in which chemotherapy is administered, and patient outcomes; and 

(4) payments to physicians for participation in the 

demonstration project should facilitate continued access 

of Medicare patients with cancer to chemotherapy treatments of the highest quality.

Attest:

Clerk.
Exhibit 32.2
  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
  I, Terry R. Lazar, Chief Financial Officer of PureSafe Water Systems, Inc. (the “Registrant”), hereby certify that the Form 10-Q/A of PureSafe Water Systems, Inc. for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2009 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
 
 Date:  May20, 2009
/s/ Terry R. LazarTerry R. LazarChief Financial Officer
#### George *W.*Lord, Respondent, *v.*Herman Koenig, Appellant.

July 1, *1879.*

In a suit before a justice, where the plaintiff files a. statement showing a balance due on account, and on trial anew in the Circuit Court it appears that the balance was due on a note, and that the plaintiff had offered, at the *454trial before the justice, to return the note, the failure to file the statement is not ground for a dismissal of the suit, and the statement will warrant a recovery.,

Appeal from St. Louis Circuit Court.

*Affirmed.*

Louis Gottschalk and G. H. Hospes, for appellant.

J. D. Foulon, for appellant.

Lewis, P. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

Plaintiff sued before a justice of the peace on an open account, as follows: —

“ *Herman Koenig, to Geo. W. Lord, Hr.*

To balance due on account of money loaned, sixty dollars.”

At the trial in the Circuit Court, upon defendant’s appeal, it appeared that the plaintiff had loaned money to defendant, taking his note secured by deed of trust; that after a gale of property under the deed, and the application of the proceeds, there remained due on the note $60, which is the sum sued for ; that; at the trial before the justice, plaintiff offered to surrender the note to defendant, who refused to receive it. The' Circuit Court refused to sustain a demurrer to the evidence, and rendered-judgment for the plaintiff.

In suits before justices of the peace, it is sufficient if the statement of the cause of action filed apprise the. defendant of the nature of the plaintiff’s demand with such certainty that a second suit cannot be maintained for the same cause of action. It has been repeatedly held that a failure to file the instrument sued on is no ground for a dismissal of the suit, but will at most only entitle the defendant to a continuance. In this case the plaintiff’s claim against the defendant was for money loaned. The note was evidence of indebtedness, but did not, remaining unpaid, operate to extinguish the original demand in the absence of an express agreement to that effect. *Steamboat v. Lumm,*9 Mo. 63; *455
      *Hughes*v. *Wheeler,*8 Cow. 77. When the plaintiff produced the note and offered to surrender it to the defendant, he made ample provision against the possibility of a second suit upon the note. Substantial justice was thus secured to the defendant. In such cases, the uniform course of adjudication is unfavorable to the operation of naked technicalities in proceedings originating before justices of the peace.

All the judges concurring, the judgment is affirmed.
Subpart 331.1 - Applicability    **Parent topic:** PART 331 - CONTRACT COST PRINCIPLES AND PROCEDURES331.101-70 Salary rate limitation.       (a) Beginning in fiscal year 1990, Congress has stipulated in the Department of Health and Human Services appropriations acts and continuing resolutions that, under applicable contracts, appropriated funds cannot be used to pay the direct salary of an individual above the stipulated rates. The applicable rates for each year are identified at *www.opm.gov*.          (b) The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 352.231-70, Salary Rate Limitation, in solicitations and contracts when a cost-reimbursement; fixed-price level-of-effort; time-and-materials; or labor-hour contract is contemplated.
#### § 5.605 Enforcement procedures.

The investigative, compliance, and enforcement procedural provisions of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000d) (“Title VI”) are hereby adopted and applied to these Title IX regulations. These procedures may be found at 10 CFR 4.21 through 4.75.

[65 FR 52875, Aug. 30, 2000]
Case 3:06-cv-00772-WKW-TFM Document 22 Filed 10/23/2007 Page 1 of 1
PGI 229.7002-4 Information required by HM Customs and Excise.       (a) *School bus contracts*. Provide one copy of the contract and all modifications to HM Customs and Excise.          (b) *Road fuel contracts*. For contracts that involve an application for relief from duty on the road fuel used in performance of the contract, provide—          (1) To HM Customs and Excise—          (i) Contract number;          (ii) Name and address of contractor;          (iii) Type of work (e.g., laundry, transportation);          (iv) Area of work; and          (v) Period of performance.          (2) To the regional office of HM Customs and Excise to which the contractor applied for relief from the duty on road fuel—one copy of the contract.          (c) *Other contracts awarded to United Kingdom firms*. Provide information when requested by HM Customs and Excise.    **Parent topic:** PGI 229.7002 Tax exemption in the United Kingdom.
Exhibit 35.4

SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

American Express Bank, FSB

American Express Issuance Trust II

Reporting Period January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2015

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer
of American Express Bank, FSB (AEFSB), a wholly-owned subsidiary of American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc. (TRS), pursuant to the Amended and Restated Supplemental Servicing Agreement, dated as of March 12,
2013, among TRS, AEFSB American Express Centurion Bank, and American Express Receivables Financing Corporation VIII LLC (as amended from time to time, the Agreement), does hereby certify that:

1. AEFSB performs certain servicing procedures on behalf of TRS under the Agreement.

2. The undersigned is duly authorized to execute and deliver this Certificate.

3. A review
of AEFSBs activities during the reporting period and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under my supervision.

4. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, AEFSB has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects
throughout the reporting period.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 28thday of March, 2016.



|                           |  |                                         
|-------------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------
|AMERICAN EXPRESS BANK, FSB
|                           | 
|By:                        |  | /s/ Denise D. Roberts                   
|Name:                      |  | Denise D. Roberts                       
|Title:                     |  | Chief Financial Officer                 
|                           | 
|By:                        |  | /s/ Brady P. Bagley                     
|Name:                      |  | Brady P. Bagley                         
|Title:                     |  | Vice President  Controller, U S Banking
The Classified Opinion is currently undergoing 1 classification review. As soon a s i t is completed, the Unclassified Opinion will be made public. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

______________________________ ALLA ALI BIN ALI AHMED, : et al., : : Petitioners, : : v. : Civil Action No. 05-1678 (GK) : BARACK H. OBAMA, et al., : : Respondents. : ______________________________: ORDER For the reasons set forth in this Court’s Classified Memorandum Opinion of May 4, 2009, it is hereby 1
ORDERED , that Petitioner Alla Ali Bin Ali Ahmed’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus is granted ; and it is further
ORDERED , that the Government take all necessary and appropriate diplomatic steps to facilitate Petitioner’s release forthwith, and to report back to the Court no later than June 15, 2009 , as to the status of Petitioner’s release.

/ s / May 5, 2009 Gladys Kessler United States District Judge Copies to: Attorneys of Record via ECF
2007-2142.

#### State v. Johnson.

Mahoning App. No. 06-MA-78, 2007-Ohio-3405. On motion for leave to file delayed appeal and motion for copies of pretrial conferences, docket items, and other data. Motions denied.

Pfeifer, J., dissents.
PGI PART 23 – ENVIRONMENT, ENERGY

AND WATER EFFICIENCY, RENEWABLE

ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES, OCCUPATIONAL

SAFETY, AND DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE

PGI SUBPART 23.90 – ENSURING ADEQUATE COVID-19 SAFETY PROTOCOLS FOR FEDERAL

CONTRACTORS

PGI 23.9001 General.

PGI SUBPART 23.90 – ENSURING ADEQUATE COVID-19

SAFETY PROTOCOLS FOR FEDERAL CONTRACTORS

PGI 23.9001 General.

(c) See Vaccination Deviation Flow Chart

(https://dlamil.dps.mil/sites/Acquisition/Shared%20Documents/J-72/Vaccination%20Deviation%20Flo

w%20Chart_Updated_29OCT2021.pdf) on the Acquisition SharePoint Page. The flow chart includes

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs).
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1042 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 1042

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                    September 27, 2006.
    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in order 
without intervention of any point of order to consider in the House the bill 
(H.R. 6166) to amend title 10, United States Code, to authorize trial by 
military commission for violations of the law of war, and for other purposes. 
The amendment printed in the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this 
resolution shall be considered as adopted. The bill, as amended, shall be 
considered as read. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the 
bill, as amended, to final passage without intervening motion except: (1) two 
hours of debate, with 80 minutes equally divided and controlled by the chairman 
and ranking minority member of the Committee on Armed Services and 40 minutes 
equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of 
the Committee on the Judiciary; and (2) one motion to recommit with or without 
instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Centenary International Corporation (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2009, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,Carlos Fabian De Sousa, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the
best of my knowledge and belief:





(1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
      Company.





/s/ Carlos Fabian De
  SousaCarlos
      Fabian De SousaChief
      Executive OfficerAugust
      12, 2009





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.  The
foregoing certifications are accompanying the Company's Form 10-Q solely
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and are not
being filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure
document.
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Corporate Trust Services**

  MAC R1204-010  9062 Old Annapolis Road  Columbia, MD 21045  Tel: 410 884 2000  Fax: 410 715 2380 |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

Deutsche Mortgage & AssetReceiving Corporation 

60 WALL ST

NEW YORK, New York 10005-2836

 

Re:  Annual Statement ofCompliance for COMM 2012-CCRE5 Commercial Mortgage-Pass-Through Certificates

 

Per the Pooling and ServicingAgreement dated as of December 1, 2012 (the "Agreement"), theundersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., asCertificate Administrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies asfollows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2016 (the "ReportingPeriod"):

 

(a) A review of Wells Fargo'sactivities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under theAgreement has been made under such officer's supervision; and

 

(b) To the best of suchofficer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of itsobligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

 

February 27, 2017

 

 

/s/ Brian Smith

BRIAN SMITH

Vice President

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll  go far |
|------------------------|-------------------------------------|
Agenda for Siloxanes Meeting 

August 21, 2013 from 10am-4p EST 

In Person Location: (Interested parties and observers will need to be signed-in. Please arrive 

promptly.) 

US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 

EPA East Room 4225 

1201 Constitution Avenue 

Washington, D.C. 20460

Call in Number: 1-866-299-3188, conference code: 202-564-2901#

1. Meeting introduction 

2. Review of current ECA draft 

3. Overview and discussion of POTW identification document 

4. Overview and discussion of test standard documents 

5. Next steps/ ECA extension