alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

EASTERN DIVISION 

ARTHUR JAMES TIGNER, ) 

 ) 

 Plaintiff, ) 

 ) 

v. ) Civil Action No. 3:06-cv-00713-MHT-SRW 

 ) 

OFFICER SELLER, et al. ) 

 ) 

 Defendants. ) 

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE THEIR SPECIAL 

REPORT AND ANSWER

COME NOW Jay Jones1, Sheriff of Lee County, Alabama, Sergeant Timothy Jones2, 

Corrections Officer David Sellers, and Corrections Officer Danny Tucker, the Defendants in the 

above-styled cause, and move this Honorable Court for an extension of time of 40 days in which 

to file their Special Report and Answer which are currently due on September 27, 2006. As 

grounds for said Motion, the Defendants state as follows: 

1. On August 18, 2006, this Court entered an Order directing the Defendants to file a 

Special Report in the above-styled cause on or before September 27, 2006. The Defendants’ 

Answers are due that same day. 

2. Counsel for the Defendants has not yet been able to schedule a time to meet with 

all the Defendants for the purpose of ascertaining the facts of the case and obtaining the 

documents located at the Lee County Detention Center which are relevant to Plaintiff’s 

allegations. 

3. The Defendants are in need of this additional time to fully respond to the 

Plaintiff’s allegations and provide this Court with a meaningful Special Report. 

 

1

 Sheriff Jay Jones is incorrectly designated in the Plaintiff’s Complaint as “Sheriff J. Jone.” 2

 Sergeant Timothy Jones is incorrectly designated in the Plaintiff’s Complaint as “Sgt. Jone.”

Case 3:06-cv-00713-MHT-SRW Document 7 Filed 09/19/2006 Page 1 of 2
2

4. The Defendants have not previously requested an extension of time in this case. 

5. The Plaintiff will not be prejudiced by the requested extension. 

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED the Defendants respectfully request this 

Honorable Court grant their Motion for Extension of Time to file their Special Report and 

Answer up to and including November 6, 2006. 

Respectfully submitted this 18th day of September, 2006. 

s/Amanda Kay Morgan 

AMANDA KAY MORGAN Bar No. ALL079 

Attorney for Defendants 

WEBB & ELEY, P.C. 

7475 Halcyon Pointe Drive 

Post Office Box 240909 

Montgomery, Alabama 36124 

Telephone: (334) 262-1850 

Fax: (334) 262-1889 

E-mail: amorgan@webbeley.com

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

 I hereby certify that on this the 18th day of September, 2006, I have electronically filed 

the foregoing with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system, and that I have mailed a 

true and correct copy of the foregoing by United States Mail, postage prepaid, to the following 

non-CM/ECF participant: 

Arthur James Tigner 

AIS 152184 

Kilby Correctional Facility 

PO Box 150 

Mt. Meigs, AL 36057 

 s/Amanda Kay Morgan 

 OF COUNSEL 

Case 3:06-cv-00713-MHT-SRW Document 7 Filed 09/19/2006 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 544 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 544

Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to require a reading 
 of the names of members of the Armed Forces who died in the previous 
                      month as a result of combat.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 28, 2017

Mr. Cartwright (for himself, Mr. Cohen, Mr. Farenthold, Mrs. Walorski, 
    Mr. Babin, Mr. Pocan, Mr. Pascrell, Mr. Franks of Arizona, Ms. 
 Bordallo, Mr. Fitzpatrick, Ms. Norton, Mr. Gibbs, Mr. Olson, and Mr. 
 Sean Patrick Maloney of New York) submitted the following resolution; 
              which was referred to the Committee on Rules

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to require a reading 
 of the names of members of the Armed Forces who died in the previous 
                      month as a result of combat.

    Resolved, That--
     (a) Clause 1 of rule XIV of the Rules of the House of 
Representatives is amended by adding after the third item the following 
new item:
            ``Fourth. On the first legislative day of each month, a 
        reading of the names of members of the Armed Forces who died in 
        the previous month as a result of combat.''.
    (b) Clause 1 of rule XIV is amended by redesignating the fourth 
through the ninth items as the fifth through the tenth items.
    (c) Rule XIV of the Rules of the House of Representatives is 
amended by adding at the end the following new clause:
    ``7. The Speaker shall not read the name of any member of the Armed 
Forces under clause 1 if any family member informs the Speaker that the 
family member does not wish to have the name of that individual 
read.''.
                                 <all>
```
p. 1



## ACETO Aceto Corporation 4 Tri Harbor Court Port Washington, NY 11050 Tel : (516) 627 6000 Fax: (516) 627 6093 www .aceto.com 

### February 16, 2011 Document Control Office (DCO) (7407M) Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics (OPPT) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 1200 Pennsylvania Ave, NW Washington, DC 20460-0001 

# IIIII,IIIIINIIINIIIII~I~III0 III,I,IIIIIII,IIIIII

ATTN : TSCA Section 4 - Docket Identification Number EPA-HQ-OPPT-2007-0531 Re : Application for Exemption, Section 4 Test Rule, Benzenediamine, ar, ar-diethyl-armethyl-, CASH 68479-98-1, Testing of certain high production volume chemicals; Second group of Chemicals, Federal Register, Vol . 76, No. 5, January 7, 2011, 40 CFR 799.5087 Dear Sir or Madam

: Aceto Corporation submits this application for exemption fromthe requirements for testing Benzenediamine, ar, ar-diethyl-ar-methyl-, CASH 68479-98-1 under TSCA Section 4 Test Rule as noted above. As part of our exemption application we are providing the following information : (a) The identity ofthe test rule, the chemical identity, and the CAS No. ofthe test substance on which the application is based. Testing of certain high production volume chemicals; Second group of Chemicals, Federal Register, Vol . 76, No. 5, January 7, 2011, 40 CFR 799.5087, Benzenediamine, ar, ar-diethylar-methyl-, CASH 68479-98-1 . (b) We are requesting an exemption fromall testing requirements for Benzenediamine, ar, ardiethyl-ar-methyl-, CASH 68479-98-1 under 40 CFR 799.5087 because we will no longer be conducting business activities with this chemical . (c) Name, address, and telephone number ofapplicant. ACETOCorporation 4 Tri Harbor Court 

### Port Washington, NY 11050 516-627-6000 (d) Name, address, and telephone number ofappropriate individual to contact for further information. Suhey Francisco. Regulatory Affairs Specialist - Environmental, Health, Safety and Regulatory Affairs ACETOCorporation 4 Tri Harbor Court Port Washington, NY 11050 

# off'1-2-001-as'31

RECEIVE(, 

# r')!-)T r,`'EC REC'D MAR 11 2011 I I FEB 23 AM 6

: 07

CONTAINS NOCBI

### 516-627-6000

As per 40 CFR790.99, ACETOCorporation provides our Statement of financial responsibility per our application for exemption: I (ACETO Corporation) understand that ifthis application is granted before the reimbursement period described in section 4(c)(3)(B) of TSCA expires, ACETOCorporation must pay fair and equitable reimbursement to the person or persons who incurred or shared in the costs of complying with the requirement to submit data and upon whose data the granting of my application was based. If you have any further questions please contact me. Sincerely, Suhey Francisco. Regulatory Affairs Specialist - Environmental, Health, Safety and Regulatory Affairs ACETOCorporation
1203.906 Remedies.       (a) The HCA is authorized to make determinations and take actions under FAR 3.906(a).          (b) The HCA is authorized to take actions under FAR 3.906(b).    **Parent topic:** Subpart 1203.9—Whistleblower Protections for Contractor Employees
2007-2242.

#### State v. Matthews.

Hamilton App. Nos. C-060669 and C-060692, 2007-Ohio-4881. On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion granted.

O’Connor and Cupp, JJ., dissent.
(logo) pwc

 

 

**Report of IndependentRegistered Public Accounting Firm**

 

 

To the Board of Directors andshareholders of CoreLogic, Inc.:

 

We have examinedmanagement’s assertion, included in the accompanying Report on Assessmentof Compliance, that CoreLogic Commercial Real Estate Services, Inc. (the"Company"), a subsidiary of CoreLogic, Inc. complied with theservicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and ExchangeCommission's Regulation AB for all loans for commercial mortgage loanoutsourcing customers for which the Company served as the commercial taxservice provider (the "Platform"), as of December 31, 2016 and forthe year then ended, only including 1122(d)(1)(iv), 1122(d)(2)(ii), 1122(d)(2)(v),1122(d)(2)(vi), 1122(d)(2)(vii), 1122(d)(4)(xi), 1122(d)(4)(xii) and1122(d)(4)(xiii), which the Company has determined are applicable to theservicing activities performed by it with respect to the Platform. Managementis responsible for the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria. Ourresponsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion based on ourexamination.

 

Our examination was conductedin accordance with attestation standards of the Public Company Accounting OversightBoard (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis,evidence about the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicingcriteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in thecircumstances. Our examination included testing of selected servicingactivities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Companyperformed those selected activities in compliance with the applicable servicingcriteria. Our procedures were limited to the selected servicing activitiesperformed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Ourprocedures were not designed to detect noncompliance arising from errors thatmay have occurred prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affectedthe balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the periodcovered by this report. We believe that our examination provides a reasonablebasis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determinationon the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria.

 

In our opinion,management’s assertion that the Company complied with the aforementionedapplicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016for all loans for commercial mortgage loan outsourcing customers for which theCompany served as the commercial tax service provider is fairly stated, in allmaterial respects.

 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers

 

February 6, 2017

 

 

*PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP,2001 Ross Avenue, Suite 1800, Dallas TX 75201-2997*

*T: 214-746-6500, F:214-712-6660,*www.pwc.com
#### James Ray CREED *v.*STATE of Arkansas

CR 07-556

259 S.W.3d 454

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Opinion delivered June 21, 2007

*Justin B. Hurst,*for appellant.

No response.

Per Curiam.

Appellant James Ray Creed, by and through his attorney, has filed a motion for rule on clerk. His attorney, Justin B. Hurst, states in the motion that the record was tendered late due to a misunderstanding on his part.

This court clarified its treatment of motions for rule on clerk and motions for belated appeals in *McDonald v. State,*356 Ark. 106, 146 S.W.3d 883 (2004). There we said that there are only two possible reasons for an appeal not being timely perfected: either the party or attorney filing the appeal is at fault, or, there is “good reason.” 356 Ark. at 116, 146 S.W.3d at 891. We explained:

> Where an appeal is not timely perfected, either the party or attorney filing the appeal is at fault, or there is good reason that the appeal was *371not timely perfected. The party or attorney filing the appeal is therefore faced with two options. First, where the party or attorney filing the appeal is at fault, fault should be admitted by affidavit filed with the motion or in the motion itself. There is no advantage in declining to admit fault where fault exists. Second, where the party or attorney believes that there is good reason the appeal was not perfected, the case for good reason can be made in the motion, and this court will decide whether good reason is present.

*Id.,*146 S.W.3d at 891 (footnote omitted). While this court no longer requires an affidavit admitting fault before we will consider the motion, an attorney should candidly admit fault where he has erred and is responsible for the failure to perfect the appeal. *See id.*

In accordance with *McDonald v. State, supra,*Mr. Hurst has candidly admitted fault. The motion is, therefore, granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Motion granted.
871.210 PART 872 [RESERVED]       (a) Contracting officers must use the following clauses, as appropriate, in solicitations and contracts for vocational rehabilitation and employment services as they pertain to training and rehabilitation services and contracts for counseling services:          (1) 852.271-72, Time Spent by Counselee in Counseling Process.          (2) 852.271-73, Use and Publication of Counseling Results.          (3) 852.271-74, Inspection of Instruction, Counseling or Testing Operations.          (b) See 837.110-70(a) for clause 852.237-74, Non-Discrimination in Service Delivery.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 871.2 - Vocational Rehabilitation and Employment Service
Case 3:06-cv-00772-WKW-TFM Document 32 Filed 06/26/2008 Page 1 of 1
Subpart 822.3 - Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act    **Parent topic:** PART 822 - APPLICATION OF LABOR LAWS TO GOVERNMENT ACQUISITIONS822.304 Variations, tolerances, and exemptions.       For contracts providing nursing home care for veterans, the Secretary of Labor has allowed a variation to the requirements of Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards (the statute) (40 U.S.C. 3701, *et seq.*) regarding the payment of overtime (see 29 CFR 5.15(d)(2)). The variation provides that overtime may be calculated on a basis other than a 40 hour workweek (as an alternate work period) when -          (a) Due to operational necessity or convenience a work period of 14 consecutive days may be accepted in lieu of the workweek of 7 consecutive days for the purpose of computing overtime compensation, pursuant to an agreement or understanding arrived at between the contractor and the contractors' employees before performance of the work; and          (b) If The contractor's employees receive compensation for employment in excess of 8 hours in any workday and in excess of 80 hours in such 14-day period at a rate not less than 1 1/2 times the regular rate at which the individual is employed, computed in accordance with the requirements of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, as amended822.305 Contract clause.       The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 852.222-70, Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards - Nursing Home Care for Veterans, in solicitations and contracts for nursing home care for veterans. The contractor shall flow down this clause and insert in all subcontracts, at any tier.
51.103-90 Ordering from Government supply

sources.

When contractor use of a DLA-managed supply source is determined to be the best value,

considering price, delivery and other factors, the contracting officer shall include contract language

to hold the contractor responsible to meet the delivery requirements whether or not Government

supply sources are used. Failure to meet the contract delivery requirements is a contractor-caused

delay.

Parent topic: SUBPART 51.1 – CONTRACTOR USE OF GOVERNMENT SUPPLY SOURCES
Case 3:06-cv-00772-WKW-TFM Document 33 Filed 07/24/2008 Page 1 of 1
###### Editorial Note on Part 35

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 35 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

#### § 35.69 Labeling of vials and syringes.

Each syringe and vial that contains unsealed byproduct material must be labeled to identify the radioactive drug. Each syringe shield and vial shield must also be labeled unless the label on the syringe or vial is visible when shielded.
§ 205.197 Response to statement of objections; reply. ( a ) Within 30 days after service of a Statement of Objections each participant may file a Response. If any motions are served with the Statement of Objections, a participant shall have 30 days from the date of service to respond to such submissions, notwithstanding any shorter time periods otherwise required in this subpart. The Response shall contain a full discussion of the position asserted and a discussion of the legal and factual bases which support that position. The Response may also contain a request that any issue of fact or law advanced in a Statement of Objections be dismissed. Any such request shall be accompanied by a full discussion of the reasons supporting the dismissal.
( b ) A participant may submit a Reply to any Response within 10 days after the date of service of the Response.
#### DALE et al. v. PATTISON.

(Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

July 16, 1912.)

No. 2,340.

Appeal from and Petition for Revision in Bankruptcy in tile Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of Ohio.

See, also, 190 Fed. 5.

Matthews, James & Matthews, of Dayton, Ohio, for appellants.

Healy, Ferris & McAvoy and Robertson *&*Buehwalter, all of Cincinnati. Ohio, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Decision affirmed.
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsBOREAS TE-11 Leaf Gas Exchange MeasurementsThe Boreal Ecosystem-Atmospheric Study (BOREAS) TE-11 (Terrestrial Ecology) team collected several data sets in support of its efforts to characterize and interpret information on the sap flow, gas exchange, and lichen photosynthesis of boreal vegetation and meteorological data of the area studied. This data set contains measurements of assimilation and transpiration conducted at the Old Jack Pine (OJP) site during the growing seasons of 1993 and 1994. The data are stored in ASCII files. The data files are available on a CD-ROM (see document number 20010000884), or from the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) Distributed Active Archive Center (DAAC).Document ID20010004226Acquisition SourceGoddard Space Flight CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsHall, Forrest G.*(NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt, MD United States)*Papagno, Andrea*(Raytheon Information Technology and Scientific Services Greenbelt, MD United States)*Saugier, Bernard*(Paris-Sud Univ. France)*Pontailler, J. Y.*(Paris-Sud Univ. France)*Date AcquiredSeptember 7, 2013Publication DateOctober 1, 2000Subject CategoryEarth Resources And Remote SensingReport/Patent NumberRept-2000-03136-0/VOL164NAS 1.15:209891/VOL164NASA/TM-2000-209891/VOL164Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 462-33-01Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20010004226.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
Editorial Note on Part 2
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

§ 2.200 Scope of subpart. ( a ) This subpart prescribes the procedures in cases initiated by the staff, or upon a request by any person, to impose requirements by order, or to modify, suspend, or revoke a license, or to take other action as may be proper, against any person subject to the jurisdiction of the Commission. However, with regard to the holder of a part 76 certificate of compliance or compliance plan, except for civil penalty procedures in this subpart, the applicable procedures are set forth in § 76.70 of this chapter.
( b ) This subpart also prescribes the procedures in cases initiated by the staff to impose civil penalties pursuant to section 234 of the Act and section 206 of the Energy Reorganization Act of 1974.
[36 FR 16896, Aug. 26, 1971, as amended at 42 FR 28893, June 6, 1977; 48 FR 44172, Sept. 28, 1983; 62 FR 6668, Feb. 12, 1997]
Case 2:06-cr-00203-MHT-CSC Document 16 Filed 10/23/2006 Page 1 of 1
2035.70 Contract clauses.

(a) The contracting officer shall insert the following clause in all solicitations and contracts for

research and development by private contractors and universities and for other technical services,

as appropriate:

(1) Section 2052.235-70, Publication of Research Results;

(2) Section 2052.235-72 Safety, Health and Fire Protection.

Parent topic: PART 2035 - RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CONTRACTING
**EXHIBIT 32.2CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

       In connection with the quarterlyreport of CNB Corporation on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2009as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, L.Ford Sanders, II, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of CNBCorporation, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002that:
| 1. | The  above-listed Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)  or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                 |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|    |                                                                                                                                                                    |
| 2. | The  information contained in the above-listed Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all  material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the  Company. |
| Date:  November  9, 2009 | /s/L. Ford Sanders, II                                                               L. Ford  Sanders, II  Executive Vice President, Treasurer, and Chief Financial Officer |
|------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        |
###### Editorial Note on Subpart A of Part 989

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 989 appear at 83 FR 53973, Oct. 26, 2018.

#### § 989.12a Cooperative bargaining association.

*Cooperative bargaining association* means a nonprofit cooperative association of raisin producers engaged within the area in bargaining with handlers as to price and otherwise arranging for the sale of natural condition raisin of its members.

[32 FR 12158, Aug. 24, 1967]