alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CHINESA CRANE

,

Appellant

,

v. Case No. 5D 15

- 1862

ANDREW SOULE CRANE

,

Appellee

.

________________________________/

Opinion filed July 8, 2016

Appeal from the Circuit Court

for Br evard County

, Kelly J. McK ibben , Judge.

Leonard Feuer, of Leonard Feuer, P.A.,

West Palm Beach, for Appellant.

Maureen Monaghan Matheson, Satellite

Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the Supplemental Final Judgment and commend the trial court for its

thorough, thoughtful, and well

- reasoned order.

AFFIRMED.

SAWAYA

, TORPY

, and EDWARDS , JJ., concur.
Amendment No. 1 to Employment Agreement - Philip Cross



 Exhibit 10.70 
 AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO 
 EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

 The following Amendment No. 1 dated as of December 18, 2009 (this “Amendment”) to the Employment
Agreement dated as of October 27, 2007 (the “Agreement”) sets forth the terms of the agreement between Philip Cross and DreamWorks Animation SKG, Inc. with respect to the matters set forth herein. 
 In consideration of the mutual covenants, representations, warranties and agreements set forth herein, the parties agree as follows:

 1. Section 1 of the Agreement is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following language: 
 “1. Term. The term of your employment hereunder commenced on September 7, 2007 (the “Commencement
Date”) and shall continue through and including February 28, 2010. This period shall hereinafter be referred to as the ‘Employment Term.’” 
 2. Except as set forth herein, the Agreement remains unmodified and in full force and effect. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment No. 1 as of the date first set forth above. 
  

			
	DREAMWORKS ANIMATION SKG, INC.
		
	By:	 	/s/    Katherine Kendrick
	Title: 	 	General Counsel


  

			
	
	/s/    Philip Cross
	PHILIP CROSS
Order entered May 20 , 2019

In The



## Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 18

- 00929

- CV

IN RE CHUAN C. CHEN, ALBERT LUTTERODT,

AND MPATANISHI TAYAR I GARRETT, Rela t ors

Original Pro ceeding from the 102nd District Court

Red River County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CV04011



### O RDER

Before Justices Bridges and Brown

Before the Court is relator Albert Lutterodt’s May 14, 2019 “Emergency Motion for

Sanctions Against David J Potter and Jac kson M Potter, et al.” We DENY the motion.

/s/ DAVID L. BRIDGES

JUSTICE
Case 3:06-cr-00208-MEF-CSC Document 68 Filed 05/03/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 3:06-cr-00208-MEF-CSC Document 68 Filed 05/03/2007 Page 2 of 2
AFS

- 14

- 013

- E November 22, 2013

Exemption No.10896 Regulatory Docket No. FAA

- 20 1 3

- 0 925

M s

. Amanda Sura

Parent of Aaron Sura

175 Steelhammer Road Silverton, O R 97381

Dear M s

. Sura :

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our decision, explains its basis, and lists the conditions and limitations of the exemption, including the date it ends.

The Basis for Ou r Decision

By letter received October 24 , 2013 , you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administrat ion (FAA) on behalf of Aaron Sura for an exemption from § 121.311(b)(2)(iii)(B) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR)

. That exemp tion , if granted, w ould allow Aaron to exceed the specified weight limit for an FAA

- approved child restraint system (CAReS, manufactured by AmSafe Corporation ) during use of that child restraint system (CRS) aboard

a United States (U.S.) aircraft.

The FAA has determined tha t good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition

in the Federal Register because the requested exem ption would not set a precedent and any delay in acting on this petition would be det rimental to Aaron

.

The FAA has issued grants of exempti on in circumstances similar in all material respects to those presented in your petition. In Grant of Exemption No. 9834 (copy enclosed), the FAA found that numerous p eople with physical challenges had previously completed flights using restraint systems t hat addressed unique physical needs regarding safety, support, and security in the same manner of operations as described in this petition. The FAA further found that the2

petition , if granted, would not set any new precedents regarding the use of restraint systems by persons with disabilities.

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that

—

• they are similar in all material respects to relief previously requested in the enclosed Grant of Exemption No. 9834;

• the reasons stated by the F AA for granting the enclosed Grant of Exemption No. 9834 also apply to the situation you present; and

• a grant of exemption is in the public interest.

Our Decision

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator

has delegated to me, I hereby grant Aaron Sura an exemption from § 121.311(b). In addition, any air carrier or commercial operator operating under part 121 while Aaron is aboard its aircraft is granted an exemption from 14 CFR § 121.311(b) to the extent nece ssary to allow

h im to use an FAA

- approved CRS aboard a U.S. aircraft

.

All operations under this exemption must be conducted w ith at least one of Aaron ’s parents or a caregiver accompanying h im

. Aaron Sura may only occupy a passenger seat with no

passenge r se ated behind h im

. In addition, Aaron ’s parent or caregiver must carry a copy of this exemption and advise the air carrier about the contents of the exemption at least 48 hours before the date of each flight.

This exemption terminates on November 30 , 2 01 8 , unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

Enclosure
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-50064

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

FABIAN LUJAN-HERNANDEZ,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 4:15-CR-457-5

Before JOLLY, PRADO, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Fabian Lujan-Hernandez has 

moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th 

Cir. 2011). Lujan-Hernandez has not filed a response. We have reviewed 

counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We 

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

February 21, 2017

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 16-50064 Document: 00513883264 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/21/2017
No. 16-50064

2

issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw 

is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the 

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 16-50064 Document: 00513883264 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/21/2017
225 So.2d 5

#### STATE of Louisiana v. Holloway BOURQUE.

No. 49966.

July 16, 1969.

In re: Holloway Bourque applying for writ of certiorari and mandamus.

Writ refused. The showing made is insufficient to warrant the exercise of our supervisory jurisdiction.

SUMMERS, J.,

concurs in the denial of writs. Since the issue is squarely presented by this application, it is my view that the trial of the civil case for damages against this accused prior to the trial of the criminal charge, involving the same transaction, is patently unfair. Under this situation the accused is prejudiced in the civil suit if he fails to take the stand, and if he does his *511Fifth Amendment rights are impaired. The criminal prosecution should be disposed of prior to the trial of the civil 'suit. However, since the delay in the criminal trial is due, in part, to continuances granted on motion of the accused, the remedy of the accused is to move for a continuance of the civil case.
Case 3:06-cr-00191-MHT-CSC Document 15 Filed 01/12/2007 Page 1 of 1
§ 436.100 Purpose and scope. ( a ) *Purpose.* The purpose of this subpart is to provide guidelines for use by Federal agencies in their development of overall 10-year energy management plans to establish energy conservation goals, to reduce the rate of energy consumption, to promote the efficient use of energy, to promote switching for petroleum-based fuels and natural gas to coal and other energy sources, to provide a methodology for reporting their progress in meeting the goals of those plans, and to promote emergency energy conservation planning to assuage the impact of a sudden disruption in the supply of oil-based fuels, natural gas or electricity. The plan is intended to provide the cornerstone for a program to conserve energy in the general operations of an agency.
( b ) *Scope.* This subpart applies to all general operations of Federal agencies and is applicable to management of all energy used by Federal agencies that is excluded from coverage pursuant to section 543(a)(2) of part 3 of title V of the National Energy Conservation Policy Act, as amended (42 U.S.C. 8251-8261).
[45 FR 44561, July 1, 1980, as amended at 55 FR 48223, Nov. 20, 1990]
PGI 239.7406 Certified cost or pricing data

and data other than certified cost or pricing

data.

Examples of instances where certified cost or pricing data, if required in accordance with FAR

15.403-4, or data other than certified cost or pricing data, if required in accordance with FAR

15.403-3, may be necessary to support price reasonableness include—

(1) Nontariffed services;

(2) Special rates and charges not included in a tariff, whether filed or to be filed;

(3) Special assembly rates and charges;

(4) Special construction and equipment charges;

(5) Contingent liabilities that are fixed at the outset of the service;

(6) Proposed cancellation and termination charges under the clause at 252.239-7007, Cancellation

or Termination of Orders, and reuse arrangements under the clause at 252.239-7008, Reuse

Arrangements;

(7) Rates contained in voluntary tariffs filed by nondominant common carriers; or

(8) A tariff, whether filed or to be filed, for new services installed or developed primarily for

Government use.

Parent topic: PGI 239.74 -TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES
# Subpart 1203.1—Safeguards

**Parent topic:**PART 1203—IMPROPER BUSINESS PRACTICES AND PERSONAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

## 1203.101-3 Agency regulations.

(a) Standards of Ethical Conduct for Employees of the Executive Branch, 5 CFR part 2635, and the Supplemental Standards of Ethical Conduct for Employees of the Department of Transportation, 5 CFR part 6001, apply to all DOT employees.
# PGI 219.602 Procedures.

- PGI 219.602-1 Referral. 
- PGI 219.602-3 Resolving differences between the agency and the Small Business Administration. 

**Parent topic:**PGI 219.6 -CERTIFICATES OF COMPETENCY
PGI 237.102-75 Defense Acquisition Guidebook.       The Defense Acquisition Guidebook, Chapter 10, Acquisition of Services, is available via the internet at https://www.dau.mil/tools/dag. Chapter 10 provides acquisition teams with a step-by-step guide explaining the process of acquiring services.    **Parent topic:** PGI 237.102 Policy.
H. Res. 513 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

September 13, 2017. 

Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall 

be in order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 3697) to 

amend the Immigration and Nationality Act with respect to 

aliens associated with criminal gangs, and for other purposes. 

All points of order against consideration of the bill are 

waived. The amendment printed in the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution shall be considered as adopted. The bill, as amended, shall be considered as 

read. All points of order against provisions in the bill, as 

amended, are waived. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill, as amended, and on any further 

amendment thereto, to final passage without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of the 

Committee on the Judiciary; and (2) one motion to recommit 

with or without instructions. 

SEC. 2. On any legislative day during the period from 

September 15, 2017, through September 22, 2017— 
2 

•HRES 513 EH 

(a) the Journal of the proceedings of the previous day 

shall be considered as approved; and 

(b) the Chair may at any time declare the House adjourned to meet at a date and time, within the limits of 

clause 4, section 5, article I of the Constitution, to be announced by the Chair in declaring the adjournment. 

SEC. 3. The Speaker may appoint Members to perform 

the duties of the Chair for the duration of the period addressed by section 2 of this resolution as though under clause 

8(a) of rule I. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
ex10-2.htm

 

    
      

    
Exhibit 10.2

    AMENDMENT
NO. 1

    TO

    AMENDED
AND RESTATED

    CHANGE IN
CONTROL AGREEMENT

    


    This AMENDMENT NO. 1 (“Amendment”) to
Amended and Restated Change in Control Agreement (the “Agreement”) is made as of
the 1st day
of January 2010 between KAMAN CORPORATION, a Connecticut corporation (the
“Company”) and NEAL J. KEATING (“Executive”).

    


    W I T N E
S S E T H:

    


    WHEREAS,
the Company and the Executive have entered into the Agreement, which was most
recently amended and restated as of November 11, 2008; and

    


    WHEREAS,
the Company and the Executive desire to further amend the
Agreement;

    


    NOW
THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, of the mutual promises contained
herein and of the other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and
sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as
follows:

    


    1.   A new sentence is
added to Section 15 of the Agreement as the first sentence thereof, as
follows:  “Except as specifically provided in this Agreement, this
Agreement shall not affect the respective rights and obligations of the Company
and the Executive under the Executive Employment Agreement.”

    


    2.      Capitalized Terms. 
Capitalized terms not otherwise defined in this Amendment shall have the
meaning ascribed to them in the Agreement.

    


    3.      Full Force and Effect. 
As modified by this Amendment, the Agreement shall remain in full force
and effect.

    


    IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment.

     

    
      
        	 
      	KAMAN
      CORPORATION
	 	 
	 
      	
                By:  

              	
                /s/ Candace
      A. Clark

              
	 
      	
                Its:

              	
                Senior
      Vice President, Chief Legal Officer

              
	 
      	 
      	
                and
      Secretary

              
	 
      	 
      	 
      
	 
      	
                Date:

              	
                February
      23, 2010

              


      



      
        	 
      	 
      	
                 NEAL
      J. KEATING

                 

              
	 
      	 
      	
                /s/ Neal
      J. Keating

              
	 
      	 
      	 
      
	 
      	 
      	
                Date:  February
      23, 2010
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
financial statements for the six months ended December 31, 1999 and
is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                             843
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,107
<ALLOWANCES>                                        22
<INVENTORY>                                      8,629
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                14,552
<PP&E>                                          36,775
<DEPRECIATION>                                  18,198
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  33,975
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,054
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            47
<OTHER-SE>                                      10,708
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    33,975
<SALES>                                         26,179
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                26,179
<CGS>                                           20,973
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   20,973
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 4,632
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 527
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     53
<INCOME-TAX>                                        42
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 12
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                        12
<EPS-BASIC>                                       .002
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .002


</TABLE>
770000"

3993900"

3990000"
77°00'00"

my are

wit

NATIONAL OCEAN SERVICE

HYDROGRAPHIC SURVEY INDEX
H6367 H6363
Haga Hoses
west
H-9453, 16366
49454 249
#2335 ead
ses 2359
H-9643 eso
9866 Heat
Ieee”
ees et H-6602
956 peers
H-9581 seat
+As6ea\ Ti 23)
W235
Haseae H6597
Weave
weBre
wee eto: Hs237
H5196 Hsees

i,
é
4 A
4 1S a
Mery
ef
&
[sxg00
need
‘en = &
nt
ee rd i
iS
doe wy ek

Art
ay
+
f.
ot
nie
oo
p
g
: ad
coed y
ae Ker
Ry
Y 0 inet

SYMBOLOGY

+ LIGHT

% ROCK -

LOW WATER

DEPTH

mt BATHYMETRIC CONTOUR

or * WITH SUPPLEMENTARY

Maximum Depth

EYISION \~

|

39°3000" i

ye 5
$ ae 3
& |
z |
< {
y i q
ff N | &
aN NS) A | :
. al .)
a
+ \.
t
ya a |
“ap ()
on. Aft APP bp ppt f |
oy. Are 4 |
ue jo i
i eagO oy 4
4 $
Ze ea . |
° 4 y K€,
*
Vy % ae |
as My |
a A Z |
a OP :
2, & |
we BZ
; SS |
* BBb, 2, .
o ze
. %
a : |
lh °
g t
te \
ag apace ' |
+ er
oa | g
We | E
ine? fo g
ine cont ll | g
° Soe 2
rs i
TP ds, |
saee
Ns |
( .
| |
|
|
i
|
|
| |
|
| | /
ate | |
fave | :
UY,
Lf, of : i |
"hen j i
are Dre , APP. f
a i
fk
wBz |
ae. vg | |
J | i
y %
ae AK |
ne
wig St see
“Raw
Li
ee . ".
x
& ®
‘° a .
iy re TF win ay Lapp we
& y mer 4 |
‘ ¥ s ape ‘ .
y os ay |
, ss ,
ve * wh RUS
~ & }
aR Vt py |
pee sk
* attegaer | |
Ro, ‘o" 2 5, | ‘ |
a yp o® RAE pee :
rs < ise SS
Any a OWS,
. * nl ‘A
A ke Sire NE Did |
x s | |
“ y 0 :
| f>- tee |
x Cy sy i
” ge f oF :
a g is |
2 Zee) x \
PP “ e |
. 7 i iy “oe |
ON 8 : i
os % Z 3
a 8 e che an i i
C7 ' |
[oo J a id |
ee, a Pe,
ape . i
fa yar " |
th Ase * var ae i
a R
vo) . | 2 if a 1
Co | al
: 5)
5]
3 ‘are Q
v
|
q nce |
ake |
we |
|
A |
y | |
| |
| I
35°09"
* 76°S0'00" | ]

INTERVAL 2 METERS
METER CONTOURS

DATUM IS MEAN LOW WATER

(BALTIMORE ====REE=")

| |
‘
TIMOR |

wuisod
#### BARUCH v. BUCKLEY.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

January 15, 1915.)

Action by Hartwig N. Baruch against Richard W. Buckley.

No opinion. Motion granted, unless appellant complies with terms stated in order. Order filed.
Exhibit 31.1.  CERTIFICATION  I, R. Allan Bradley, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this report of Questar Pipeline Company on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended March 31, 2008;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. [intentionally omitted];  4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and we have:  a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;  c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting.  5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):  a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.    November 6, 2008 /s/R. Allan Bradley R. Allan Bradley President and Chief Executive Officer
#### § 202.22 Production or disclosure prohibited unless approved by appropriate DOE official.

No employee or former employee of the DOE shall, in response to a demand of a court or other authority, produce any material contained in the file of the DOE or disclose any information relating to material contained in the files of the DOE, or disclose any information or produce any material acquired as part of the performance of his official duties or because of his official status without prior approval of the General Counsel of DOE.