alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 431.222 Definitions concerning traffic signal modules and pedestrian modules. *Basic model* means all units of a given type of covered product (or class thereof) manufactured by one manufacturer, having the same primary energy source, and which have essentially identical electrical, physical, and functional (or hydraulic) characteristics that affect energy consumption, energy efficiency, water consumption, or water efficiency.
*Maximum wattage* means the power consumed by the module after being operated for 60 minutes while mounted in a temperature testing chamber so that the lensed portion of the module is outside the chamber, all portions of the module behind the lens are within the chamber at a temperature of 74 °C and the air temperature in front of the lens is maintained at a minimum of 49 °C.
*Nominal wattage* means the power consumed by the module when it is operated within a chamber at a temperature of 25 °C after the signal has been operated for 60 minutes.
*Pedestrian module* means a light signal used to convey movement information to pedestrians.
*Traffic signal module* means a standard 8-inch (200 mm) or 12-inch (300 mm) traffic signal indication that— ( 1 ) Consists of a light source, a lens, and all other parts necessary for operation; and
( 2 ) Communicates movement messages to drivers through red, amber, and green colors.
[70 FR 60417, Oct. 18, 2005, as amended at 71 FR 71373, Dec. 8, 2006; 76 FR 12504, Mar. 7, 2011]
#### § 429.100 Purpose and scope.

This subpart describes the enforcement authority of DOE to ensure compliance with the conservation standards and regulations.
Case 3:06-cv-00772-WKW-TFM Document 30 Filed 02/21/2008 Page 1 of 14
Case 3:06-cv-00772-WKW-TFM Document 30 Filed 02/21/2008 Page 2 of 14
Case 3:06-cv-00772-WKW-TFM Document 30 Filed 02/21/2008 Page 3 of 14
Case 3:06-cv-00772-WKW-TFM Document 30 Filed 02/21/2008 Page 4 of 14
Case 3:06-cv-00772-WKW-TFM Document 30 Filed 02/21/2008 Page 5 of 14
Case 3:06-cv-00772-WKW-TFM Document 30 Filed 02/21/2008 Page 6 of 14
Case 3:06-cv-00772-WKW-TFM Document 30 Filed 02/21/2008 Page 7 of 14
Case 3:06-cv-00772-WKW-TFM Document 30 Filed 02/21/2008 Page 8 of 14
Case 3:06-cv-00772-WKW-TFM Document 30 Filed 02/21/2008 Page 9 of 14
Case 3:06-cv-00772-WKW-TFM Document 30 Filed 02/21/2008 Page 10 of 14
Case 3:06-cv-00772-WKW-TFM Document 30 Filed 02/21/2008 Page 11 of 14
Case 3:06-cv-00772-WKW-TFM Document 30 Filed 02/21/2008 Page 12 of 14
Case 3:06-cv-00772-WKW-TFM Document 30 Filed 02/21/2008 Page 13 of 14
Case 3:06-cv-00772-WKW-TFM Document 30 Filed 02/21/2008 Page 14 of 14
2007-2359.

#### State v. Brown.

Allen App. No. 1-05-11, 2005-Ohio-6177. On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied.
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Senrick Wilkerson v. Ramsey 1 Unit

Appellate case number: 01-14-00790-CV

Trial court case number: 78470-I

Trial court: 412th Judicial District Court of Brazoria County

Appellant Senrick Wilkerson, an inmate, appeals the trial court’s judgment dismissing his 

underlying civil action as frivolous. On appeal, appellant filed an affidavit of inability to pay 

costs (attached to a motion to appoint counsel that this Court denied on November 13, 2014) but 

has failed to comply with the additional requirements of Chapter 14 of the Texas Civil Practices 

and Remedies Code governing inmate litigation.

Section 14.004 of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code provides that an inmate 

who files an affidavit or unsworn declaration of inability to pay costs must file an additional 

affidavit or declaration identifying each prior lawsuit, other than an action under the Family 

Code, filed by the inmate without legal representation. TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE § 

14.004(a). As to each prior lawsuit, the affidavit or declaration must specify the operative facts, 

the case name or style, the cause number, the court in which it was brought, the names of the 

parties, and the result of the suit. Id. If a previous action or claim was dismissed as frivolous or 

malicious, the affidavit or unsworn declaration of previous filings must state the date of any final 

judgment or order affirming the dismissal. TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE § 14.004(b).

Additionally, the affidavit or unsworn declaration of previous filings must be 

accompanied by a certified copy of the inmate’s trust account statement reflecting the balance of 

the account at the time the appeal was filed and all account activity during the six months 

preceding the date the appeal was filed. TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE §§ 14.004(c); 14.006(f); 

see Douglas v. Moffett, 418 S.W.3d 336, 339 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2013, no pet.).

Appellant has not filed an additional affidavit or declaration relating to previous filings 

nor has appellant filed a certified copy of his inmate trust account statement. Unless all

documents required by Chapter 14 of the Texas Civil Practices and Remedies Code are filed by 

February 27, 2015, this appeal may be dismissed without further notice. See Gozowski v. 

T.D.C.J.–I.D., No. 12-14-00350-CV, 2014 WL 6983246, *1 (Tex. App.—Tyler Dec. 10, 2014, 

no pet. h.; Hickman v. Tex. Dep’t of Criminal Justice, No. 13-12-00437-CV, 2013 WL 3770916, 
at *2 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi July 18, 2013, no pet.); Douglas v. Turner, 441 S.W.3d 337, 

339 (Tex. App.—Waco May 9, 2013, no pet.).

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Jane Bland

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: January 27, 2015
Exhibit 31

SEMT 2013-2

EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d)
Certification.

I, Christopher J. Abate, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form
10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Sequoia Mortgage Trust 2013-2 (the
Exchange Act periodic reports);

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain
any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4. Based
on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing
agreements in all material respects; and

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such
reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I
have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Cenlar, FSB as Servicer, First Republic Bank as Servicer, PHH Mortgage Corporation as Servicer, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as Custodian and Master Servicer, and
Citibank, N.A. as Securities Administrator and Paying Agent.

Date: April 1, 2019



|                        
|------------------------
|                        
|/s/ Christopher J. Abate
|Signature               

Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Financial Officer

(senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
Case 2:06-cv-00717-ID-SRW Document 88 Filed 10/01/2007 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:06-cv-00717-ID-SRW Document 88 Filed 10/01/2007 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:06-cv-00717-ID-SRW Document 88 Filed 10/01/2007 Page 3 of 3
Extension Agreement to $1 Billion Credit Agreement



 Exhibit 10.17c 
 EXTENSION AGREEMENT 
 JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., 
 as Administrative Agent 
 under the Credit Agreement 
 referred to below 
 270 Park Avenue 
 New York, New NY 10017 
 Gentlemen: 
 The undersigned
hereby agrees to extend the Termination Date under the Credit Agreement dated as of December 23, 2004 (as amended from time to time, the “Credit Agreement”) among Praxair, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
“Company”), the Subsidiaries referred to therein, the Lenders party thereto, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent (the “Administrative Agent”), Bank of America, N.A., as Syndication Agent and Citibank,
N.A. and Credit Suisse First Boston, as Co-Documentation Agents, to December 23, 2011. Terms defined in the Credit Agreement are used herein with the same meaning. 
 This Extension Agreement shall be construed in accordance with and governed by the law of the State of New York. 
  

					
	WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ JORDAN FRAGIACOMO

		 	Name:	 	JORDAN FRAGIACOMO
		 	Title:	 	Vice President


 Agreed and accepted: 
  

					
	PRAXAIR, INC.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Michael J. Allan

		 	Name: 	 	Michael J. Allan
		 	Title:	 	Vice President and Treasurer
	
	 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., as Administrative Agent

		
	By:	 	 /s/ Stacey L. Haimes

		 	Name:	 	Stacey L. Haimes
		 	Title:	 	Executive Director
IV 

House Calendar No. 77 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 395 

[Report No. 109–201] 

Providing for consideration of motions to suspend the rules. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 27, 2005 

Mr. PUTNAM, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; 

which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of motions to suspend the rules. 

1 Resolved, That it shall be in order at any time on 

2 the legislative day of Thursday, July 28, 2005, for the 

3 Speaker to entertain motions that the House suspend the 

4 rules. The Speaker or his designee shall consult with the 

5 Minority Leader or her designee on the designation of any 

6 matter for consideration pursuant to this resolution. 
House Calendar No. 77 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 395 

[Report No. 109–201] 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of motions to suspend 

the rules. 

JULY 27, 2005 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION

CALVIN FLUKER, et al., )

)

Plaintiffs, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

v. ) 2:06cv785-MHT

) 

U.S. FOODSERVICE, INC., )

and U.S. FOODSERVICE, )

INC.- MONTGOMERY DIVISION, )

)

Defendant. )

 RULE 26(F) ORDER

The parties are reminded of the obligation, imposed

by Rule 26(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, to

confer and to develop a proposed discovery plan.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Rule 26(f) report

containing the discovery plan shall be filed as soon as

practicable but not later than October 17, 2006.

The longstanding practice in this district is that

dispositive motions shall be filed no later than 90 days

prior to the pretrial date. If the parties seek to vary

from that schedule, they should present, in the plan,

Case 2:06-cv-00785-MHT-WC Document 7 Filed 09/27/2006 Page 1 of 3
2

specific case-related reasons for the requested variance.

In their Rule 26(f) report, however, the parties should

assume that the 90-day requirement will apply.

This case will be set for trial before the

undersigned judge during one of that judge's regularly

scheduled civil trial terms, within 7 to 10 months of

this order if a term is available and, if not available,

then as soon as possible thereafter. The pretrial date

is normally set within four to six weeks of a scheduled

trial term. The dates of each judge's civil trial terms

are available on the court's website located at

<http://almd.uscourts.gov> in the civil case information

section.

The court may or may not hold a scheduling conference

before issuing a scheduling order. If the court holds a

scheduling conference, counsel may participate in the

scheduling conference by conference call.

The scheduling order entered by the court will follow

the form of the Uniform Scheduling Order adopted by the

Case 2:06-cv-00785-MHT-WC Document 7 Filed 09/27/2006 Page 2 of 3
judges of this court. The Uniform Scheduling Order is

also available on the court's website.

The report of the parties should comply with Form 35

of the Appendix of Forms to the Federal Rules of Civil

Procedure.

DONE, this the 27th day of October, 2006.

 /s/ Myron H. Thompson 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00785-MHT-WC Document 7 Filed 09/27/2006 Page 3 of 3
Subpart 2033.1 - Protests

Parent topic: PART 2033 - PROTESTS, DISPUTES, AND APPEALS

2033.103 Protests to the agency.

Protests to the agency are first considered by the contracting officer. In accordance with FAR

33.103(d)(4), the protestor may appeal the contracting officer's decision by delivering or providing a

written request to the agency Director, Division of Contracts or Property Management, or designee,

to conduct an independent review of the Contracting Officer's decision.
#### LEWIS et al. v. CLARKE et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

June 26, 1914.)

Action by Edward C. Lewis and John H. Kitchen, copartners, etc., against Henry S. Clarke and others.

PER CURIAM.

Order and interlocutory PER judgment affirmed, with costs and disbursements, but with leave to defendants within 20 days after entry of the order herein to withdraw such demurrer and answer the complaint, upon payment of the costs awarded at the Special Term and upon this appeal. While the complaint may not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action against the former mayor, it does as against the common council. *1127"Where two or more defendants unite in demurring to a complaint, * * * it must be overruled if the complaint states a good cause of action against any one of the parties jointly demurring." 6 Ency. of Plead. & Prac. p. 321; People v. Mayor, 28 Barb. 240, 251; Holmes v. Seaboard Portland Cement Co., 63 Misc. Rep. 82, 116 N. Y. Supp. 524.
Exhibit 31

SEMT 2012-6

 

EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certification.

 

I, Jeremy P. Strom, certify that:

 

1.I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Sequoia Mortgage Trust 2012-6 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

 

2.Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4.Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and

 

5.All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: CoreLogic Tax Services, LLC (“CoreLogic”), American Security Insurance Company, Standard Guaranty Insurance Company and TrackSure Insurance Agency, Inc. (collectively, “Assurant”), Cenlar, FSB as Servicer, First Republic Bank as Servicer, PHH Mortgage Corporation as Servicer, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as Custodian and Master Servicer, Computershare Trust Company, N.A. as Custodian and Master Servicer, and Citibank, N.A. as Securities Administrator and Paying Agent.

 

Date: March 30, 2022

 

 

/s/ Jeremy. P Strom

Signature 

 

President

(senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

 NORTHERN DIVISION

 ______________________________

JAMES G. HUFFMAN *

Plaintiff, *

v. * 2:06-CV-748-MEF

SOUTHERN HEALTH SERVICES, et al., *

Defendants. *

 ______________________________

ORDER

Plaintiff filed this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action on August 22, 2006. On August 30, 2006

the court entered an order of procedure which informed Plaintiff, among other things, that

if he moved to a different institution or was released, he must immediately inform the court

and Defendants of his new address. 

On January 12, 2007 Plaintiff’s copy of an order entered January 5, 2007 was

returned to the court marked “Return to Sender; not deliverable as addressed; unable to

forward,” because Plaintiff is no longer at the most recent address he provided to the court.

This case cannot proceed if Plaintiff’s whereabouts remain unknown to this court. 

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that:

1. On or before February 5, 2007 Plaintiff shall SHOW CAUSE why this case should

not be dismissed for his failures to comply with the orders of this court and to prosecute this

action; and

Case 2:06-cv-00748-MEF-WC Document 30 Filed 01/22/2007 Page 1 of 2
2 The Clerk SEND of a copy of this order to Plaintiff at his last known mailing

address. 

Plaintiff is specifically cautioned that if he fails to respond to this order the Magistrate

Judge will recommend that this case be dismissed. 

Done, this 22nd day of January 2007.

 /s/Wallace Capel, Jr. 

WALLACE CAPEL, JR.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00748-MEF-WC Document 30 Filed 01/22/2007 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 10.57


 


Abbott
Laboratories


 


Description
of Base Salary of Named Executive Officers


 


Set
forth below are the base salaries, effective December 31, 2009 and March 1,
2010, of Miles D. White, Thomas C. Freyman, John M. Capek, Laura J. Schumacher,
and James L. Tyree, all of whom were named executive officers in 2009.


 


Miles D. White


 


	
   

  	
   

  	
  Base Salary

  	
   

  
	
  December 31,
  2009

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  1,861,700

  	
   

  
	
  March 1,
  2010

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  1,900,000

  	
   

  



 


Thomas
C. Freyman


 


	
   

  	
   

  	
  Base Salary

  	
   

  
	
  December 31,
  2009

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  919,100

  	
   

  
	
  March 1,
  2010

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  946,700

  	
   

  



 


John M. Capek


 


	
   

  	
   

  	
  Base Salary

  	
   

  
	
  December 31,
  2009

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  615,900

  	
   

  
	
  March 1,
  2010

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  634,400

  	
   

  



 


Laura J. Schumacher


 


	
   

  	
   

  	
  Base Salary

  	
   

  
	
  December 31,
  2009

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  803,400

  	
   

  
	
  March 1,
  2010

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  827,500

  	
   

  



 


James L. Tyree


 


	
   

  	
   

  	
  Base Salary

  	
   

  
	
  December 31,
  2009

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  723,100

  	
   

  
	
  March 1,
  2010

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  744,800
**EXHIBIT 32.2CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

       In connection with the quarterlyreport of CNB Corporation on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2010 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, L.Ford Sanders, II, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of CNBCorporation, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002that:

 
| 1.     | The  above-listed Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)  or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                 |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                    |
| 2.     | The  information contained in the above-listed Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all  material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the  Company. |

 
| Date:  August  9, 2010 | /s/L. Ford Sanders, II                                                               L. Ford Sanders,  II  Executive Vice President, Treasurer, and Chief Financial Officer |
|----------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        |
301.603-1 General.       (a) The Agency head has delegated broad authority to the Chief Acquisition Officer, who in turn has further delegated this authority to the SPE. The SPE has further delegated specific acquisition authority to the Operating and Staff Division heads and the HCAs. The HCA (non-delegable) shall select, appoint, and terminate the appointment of contracting officers.          (b) To ensure proper control of redelegated acquisition authorities, HCAs shall maintain a file containing successive delegations of HCA authority through the contracting officer level.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 301.6 - Career Development, Contracting Authority, and Responsibilities
1

Amtrak Regional Amfleet Coach + PRIIA / RVAAC

–Impact per car: 4 seats

–Existing fleet 373 cars

–Fleet impact: 1492 seats

–Replacement fleet: 395 cars
2

Acela Business Class Coach + PRIIA / RVAAC

–Impact per BC: 6 seats

–Impact per FC: 4

–Impact per train: 28

–Existing fleet 100 cars; 20 

train sets

–Fleet impact: 560 seats

–Replacement fleet: 110 cars; 

22 train sets
3

5 Section Light Rail Car + RVAAC