alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
2007-1900.

#### State ex rel. Stillwell v. Timmerman-Cooper.

Madison App. No. CA2007-04-014. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court *1432of Appeals for Madison County. It appears from the records of this court that appellant has not filed a merit brief, due December 3rd, 2007, in compliance with the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court and therefore has failed to prosecute this cause with the requisite diligence. Upon consideration thereof,

It is ordered by the court that this cause is dismissed sua sponte.
NotesFAQContact Us

Collection

Thesaurus
AdvancedSearch Tips

Collection

Thesaurus
BrowseThesaurus

 Download full text

**ERIC Number:**

**Record Type:**

**Publication Date:**

**Pages:**

**Abstractor:**

**ISBN:**

**ISSN:**

**EISSN:**

Elementary Secondary EducationEnvironmental EducationHigher EducationInformation SourcesInternetResource MaterialsWorld Wide Web

**Publication Type:**

**Education Level:**

**Audience:**

**Language:**

**Sponsor:**

**Authoring Institution:**

**Grant or Contract Numbers:**

PrivacyCopyrightContact UsSelection PolicyAPI
JournalsNon-JournalsDownloadSubmitMultimediaWidget
2007-2127.

#### State ex rel. Harris v. Russo.

In Mandamus. On motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss granted. Cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.
89–008

106TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 2d Session 106–1006

PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF MOTIONS TO

SUSPEND THE RULES

OCTOBER 26 (legislative day, OCTOBER 25), 2000.—Referred to the House Calendar

and ordered to be printed

Mr. REYNOLDS, from the Committee on Rules,

submitted the following

REPORT

[To accompany H. Res. 651]

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House

Resolution 651, by a non-record vote, report the same to the House

with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted.

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution provides that certain specified bills and resolutions may be considered under suspension of the rules at any time

on the legislative day of Thursday, October 26, 2000.

Æ
Exhibit 32








Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350


(Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)





Securities and Exchange Commission


100 F Street, N.E.


Washington, D.C. 20549





In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Gulf Coast Ultra Deep Royalty Trust (the “Trust”) for the year ending December 31, 2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, not in its individual capacity but solely as the trustee of the Trust, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of its knowledge:





(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.





Date:  March 31, 2014





/s/ Michael J. Ulrich


Michael J. Ulrich


Vice President


The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as Trustee of Gulf Coast Ultra Deep Royalty Trust











The above certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-K or as a separate disclosure document.
#### § 217.3 Program eligibility.

Certain programs to promote the national defense are eligible for priorities and allocations support. These include programs for military and energy production or construction, military or critical infrastructure assistance to any foreign nation, deploying and sustaining military forces, homeland security, stockpiling, space, and any directly related activity. Other eligible programs include emergency preparedness activities conducted pursuant to title VI of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 5195 *et seq.*) and critical infrastructure protection and restoration.
PGI 245.103-72 Government-furnished

property attachments to solicitations and

awards.

(a) When Government-furnished property (GFP) is anticipated, create the GFP attachment in the

GFP module of the Procurement Integrated Enterprise Environment (PIEE) at

https://piee.eb.mil/piee-landing to—

(1) Specify the required GFP data elements; and

(2) Identify GFP serially-managed items, GFP nonserially-managed items, and GFP items that may be

requisitioned from the DoD supply system by the contractor; and

(3) Accomplish the electronic transmission of the GFP attachment to the contract in the Electronic

Data Access application in the PIEE.

(b) For more information on the GFP attachments, see

https://dodprocurementtoolbox.com/site-pages/gfp-attachments.]

Parent topic: PGI 245.103 General.
<PAGE>


EXHIBIT 31.1
CERTIFICATION
Required by Rule 13a-14(a)

I, Reginald M. Fountain, Jr., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Fountain
Powerboat Industries, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in
all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls
and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a 15(e) and
15d 15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during
the period in which this report is being prepared;

b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and

c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal
control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors
and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting
which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and

b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting.



Date:  May 14, 2004         /s/Reginald M. Fountain, Jr.
                               Reginald M. Fountain, Jr.
                               President and Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 369 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 369

           Recognizing May 29, 2017, as ``National 529 Day''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 25, 2017

 Mr. Wittman submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                    the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
           Recognizing May 29, 2017, as ``National 529 Day''.

Whereas the United States is committed to competing in the global economy and 
        providing all students with the education and skills that will enable 
        them to compete successfully;
Whereas it is in the best interest of our Nation's employers to ensure a well-
        educated workforce;
Whereas post-secondary education at colleges, graduate schools, vocational 
        schools and technical institutions is an investment in one's future 
        which opens doors to better jobs and higher earnings;
Whereas saving in advance for higher education can help Americans reach their 
        personal and professional goals and avoid student loan debt;
Whereas 529 savings plans allow families to dedicate funds towards their own 
        education or the education of a loved one in an account that will grow 
        tax free for future use toward qualified higher education expenses; and
Whereas National 529 Day is an opportunity for all Americans to learn about and 
        begin saving to achieve their higher education needs: Now, therefore, be 
        it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives hereby recognizes 
``National 529 Day'' and the opportunities that 529 savings plans 
provide American families to save for education.
                                 <all>
```
Editorial Note on Part 26
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 26 appear at 87 FR 71455, Nov. 22, 2022.

§ 26.823 Violations. ( a ) An injunction or other court order may be obtained to prohibit a violation of any provision of— ( 1 ) The Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended;
( 2 ) Title II of the Energy Reorganization Act of 1974; or
( 3 ) Any regulation or order issued under these Acts.
( b ) A court order may be obtained for the payment of a civil penalty imposed under section 234 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, for violations of— ( 1 ) Section 53, 57, 62, 63, 81, 82, 101, 103, 104, 107, or 109 of the Act;
( 2 ) Section 206 of the Energy Reorganization Act of 1974;
( 3 ) Any rule, regulation, or order issued under these sections;
( 4 ) Any term, condition, or limitation of any license issued under these sections; or
( 5 ) Any provisions for which a license may be revoked under section 186 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954.
§ 52.6 Completeness and accuracy of information. ( a ) Information provided to the Commission by a licensee (including an early site permit holder, a combined license holder, and a manufacturing license holder), a holder of a standard design approval under this part, and an applicant for a license or an applicant for a standard design certification or a standard design approval under this part, and information required by statute or by the Commission's regulations, orders, license conditions, or terms and conditions of a standard design approval to be maintained by the licensee, the holder of a standard design approval under this part, the applicant for a standard design certification under this part following Commission adoption of a final design certification rule, and an applicant for a license, a standard design certification, or a standard design approval under this part shall be complete and accurate in all material respects.
( b ) Each applicant or licensee, each holder of a standard design approval under this part, and each applicant for a standard design certification under this part following Commission adoption of a final design certification regulation, shall notify the Commission of information identified by the applicant or the licensee as having for the regulated activity a significant implication for public health and safety or common defense and security. An applicant, licensee, or holder violates this paragraph only if the applicant, licensee, or holder fails to notify the Commission of information that the applicant, licensee, or holder has been identified as having a significant implication for public health and safety or common defense and security. Notification shall be provided to the Administrator of the appropriate Regional Office within 2 working days of identifying the information. This requirement is not applicable to information which is already required to be provided to the Commission by other reporting or updating requirements.
2007-2103.

#### Hale v. Wilson.

In Habeas Corpus. On petition for writ of habeas corpus of Gilbert Hale. Sua sponte, cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.
exv4w1






Exhibit 4.1 








	Lionsgate Lions gate entertainment corp.
amalgamated in the province of british columia
this certify that is the rigistered holders of fully paid and non assessable commom
shares without par value in teh capital of Lions gate entertainment corp.
CUSIP 535919 20 3







 









 








     FOR VALUE RECEIVED the undersigned hereby sells, assigns and transfers unto



PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL INSURANCE NUMBER OF TRANSFEREE




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 
	 	 	 	 
 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 





 



(Name and address of transferee)


 











	 	 	 
	
 


	 	shares
	registered in the name of the undersigned on the books of the Company named on the face
of this certificate and represented hereby, and irrevocably constitutes and appoints







	 	 	 
	
 


	 	the attorney
	of the undersigned to transfer the said shares on the register of transfers and books
of the Company with full power of substitution hereunder.







     DATED:










	 	 	 
	 
	 	 
	
(Signature of Witness)
	 	
(Signature of Shareholder)








 




			
	NOTICE: 	 	For transfers signed by the registered holder(s), their signature(s) must
correspond with the name(s) on the certificate(s) or statement in every particular,
without any changes. In addition, every signature must be Signature Guaranteed by a
Canadian Schedule, I chartered bank, a major trust company in Canada, or a member of
one of the recognized medallion programs — Securities Transfer Agents Medallion
Program (STAMP), Stock Exchanges Medallion Program (SEMP) or New York Stock
Exchange, Inc. Medallion Signature Program (MSP).




Signature Guaranteed By:
§ 455.104 Rebates from utilities and other entities. ( a ) Grantees which receive rebates or other monetary considerations from utilities or other entities for installing the energy conservation measures funded by a grant under this part may use such funds to meet their cost- sharing obligations pursuant to § 455.100.
( b ) Where the rebate or monetary consideration does not exceed the non-Federal share of the cost of the measures applied for in a grant application, grantees are not required to deduct the amount of the rebate or monetary consideration from the cost of the measures, and DOE does not consider such rebates or monetary considerations to be program income which would have to be remitted to DOE upon receipt by the grantee.
( c ) Where the rebate or monetary consideration does exceed the non-Federal share of the cost of the measures applied for in a grant application, grantees may use the excess to fund additional measures if such measures have been recommended in the technical assistance report. If it is not possible to use the excess funding in this way, the grantee must reduce the cost—and DOE will reduce the Federal share—by the amount of the excess above the non-Federal share.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 245 (Wednesday, December 22, 2010)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 80350-80351]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-32128]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION

41 CFR Parts 300-3, 301-10, 301-12, 301-30, 301-70, Chapter 301, 
Parts 302-1, 302-2, 302-3, 302-7, 302-11, and 303-70

[FTR Amendment 2010-07; FTR Case 2010-307; Docket 2010-0020, Sequence 
1]
RIN 3090-AJ09


Federal Travel Regulation; Removal of Privately Owned Vehicle 
Rates; Privately Owned Automobile Mileage Reimbursement When Government 
Owned Automobiles Are Authorized; Miscellaneous Amendments; Correction

AGENCY: Office of Governmentwide Policy, General Services 
Administration (GSA).

ACTION: Final rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: GSA is correcting a final rule that appeared in the Federal 
Register on November 29, 2010. The applicability date for the final 
rule was incorrectly designated December 29, 2010. This final rule 
correction document corrects the applicability date to January 1, 2011.

DATES: The effective date for the final rule published on November 29, 
2010 at 75 FR 72965 remains November 29, 2010. The applicability date 
is corrected to January 1, 2011.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The Regulatory Secretariat (MVCB), 
1275 First Street, NE., Washington, DC, 20417, (202) 501-4755, for 
information pertaining to status or publication schedules. For 
clarification of content,

[[Page 80351]]

contact Mr. Cy Greenidge, Program Analyst, Office of Governmentwide 
Policy, at (202) 219-2349. Please cite FTR Amendment 2010-07; FTR case 
2010-307.

    Dated: December 16, 2010.
James Vogelsinger,
Acting Deputy Associate Administrator, Office of Governmentwide Policy.
[FR Doc. 2010-32128 Filed 12-21-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-14-P
Case 2:06-cv-00747-MEF-CSC Document 1 Filed 08/21/2006 Page 1 of 38
Case 2:06-cv-00747-MEF-CSC Document 1 Filed 08/21/2006 Page 2 of 38
Case 2:06-cv-00747-MEF-CSC Document 1 Filed 08/21/2006 Page 3 of 38
Case 2:06-cv-00747-MEF-CSC Document 1 Filed 08/21/2006 Page 4 of 38
Case 2:06-cv-00747-MEF-CSC Document 1 Filed 08/21/2006 Page 5 of 38
Case 2:06-cv-00747-MEF-CSC Document 1 Filed 08/21/2006 Page 6 of 38
Case 2:06-cv-00747-MEF-CSC Document 1 Filed 08/21/2006 Page 7 of 38
Case 2:06-cv-00747-MEF-CSC Document 1 Filed 08/21/2006 Page 8 of 38
Case 2:06-cv-00747-MEF-CSC Document 1 Filed 08/21/2006 Page 9 of 38
Case 2:06-cv-00747-MEF-CSC Document 1 Filed 08/21/2006 Page 10 of 38
Case 2:06-cv-00747-MEF-CSC Document 1 Filed 08/21/2006 Page 11 of 38
Case 2:06-cv-00747-MEF-CSC Document 1 Filed 08/21/2006 Page 12 of 38
Case 2:06-cv-00747-MEF-CSC Document 1 Filed 08/21/2006 Page 13 of 38
Case 2:06-cv-00747-MEF-CSC Document 1 Filed 08/21/2006 Page 14 of 38
Case 2:06-cv-00747-MEF-CSC Document 1 Filed 08/21/2006 Page 15 of 38
Case 2:06-cv-00747-MEF-CSC Document 1 Filed 08/21/2006 Page 16 of 38
Case 2:06-cv-00747-MEF-CSC Document 1 Filed 08/21/2006 Page 17 of 38
Case 2:06-cv-00747-MEF-CSC Document 1 Filed 08/21/2006 Page 18 of 38
Case 2:06-cv-00747-MEF-CSC Document 1 Filed 08/21/2006 Page 19 of 38
Case 2:06-cv-00747-MEF-CSC Document 1 Filed 08/21/2006 Page 20 of 38
Case 2:06-cv-00747-MEF-CSC Document 1 Filed 08/21/2006 Page 21 of 38
Case 2:06-cv-00747-MEF-CSC Document 1 Filed 08/21/2006 Page 22 of 38
Case 2:06-cv-00747-MEF-CSC Document 1 Filed 08/21/2006 Page 23 of 38
Case 2:06-cv-00747-MEF-CSC Document 1 Filed 08/21/2006 Page 24 of 38
Case 2:06-cv-00747-MEF-CSC Document 1 Filed 08/21/2006 Page 25 of 38
Case 2:06-cv-00747-MEF-CSC Document 1 Filed 08/21/2006 Page 26 of 38
Case 2:06-cv-00747-MEF-CSC Document 1 Filed 08/21/2006 Page 27 of 38
Case 2:06-cv-00747-MEF-CSC Document 1 Filed 08/21/2006 Page 28 of 38
Case 2:06-cv-00747-MEF-CSC Document 1 Filed 08/21/2006 Page 29 of 38
Case 2:06-cv-00747-MEF-CSC Document 1 Filed 08/21/2006 Page 30 of 38
Case 2:06-cv-00747-MEF-CSC Document 1 Filed 08/21/2006 Page 31 of 38
Case 2:06-cv-00747-MEF-CSC Document 1 Filed 08/21/2006 Page 32 of 38
Case 2:06-cv-00747-MEF-CSC Document 1 Filed 08/21/2006 Page 33 of 38
Case 2:06-cv-00747-MEF-CSC Document 1 Filed 08/21/2006 Page 34 of 38
Case 2:06-cv-00747-MEF-CSC Document 1 Filed 08/21/2006 Page 35 of 38
Case 2:06-cv-00747-MEF-CSC Document 1 Filed 08/21/2006 Page 36 of 38
Case 2:06-cv-00747-MEF-CSC Document 1 Filed 08/21/2006 Page 37 of 38
Case 2:06-cv-00747-MEF-CSC Document 1 Filed 08/21/2006 Page 38 of 38
Case 2:06-cv-00790-WC Document 6 Filed 11/06/2006 Page 1 of 8
Case 2:06-cv-00790-WC Document 6 Filed 11/06/2006 Page 2 of 8
Case 2:06-cv-00790-WC Document 6 Filed 11/06/2006 Page 3 of 8
Case 2:06-cv-00790-WC Document 6 Filed 11/06/2006 Page 4 of 8
Case 2:06-cv-00790-WC Document 6 Filed 11/06/2006 Page 5 of 8
Case 2:06-cv-00790-WC Document 6 Filed 11/06/2006 Page 6 of 8
Case 2:06-cv-00790-WC Document 6 Filed 11/06/2006 Page 7 of 8
Case 2:06-cv-00790-WC Document 6 Filed 11/06/2006 Page 8 of 8
Exhibit 32

Certification

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States
Code), each of the undersigned officers of FNB United Corp., a North Carolina corporation (the Corporation), does hereby certify that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 (the Form 10-Q) of the Corporation fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information
contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all materials respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.



|      |  |             |  |                         |  | 
|----- |  | ----------- |  | ----------------------- |  | 
|Date: |  | May 9, 2007 |  | /s/ Michael C. Miller   |  | 
|      |  |             |  | Michael C. Miller       |  | 
|      |  |             |  | Chief Executive Officer |  | 
|      |  |             | 
|Date: |  | May 9, 2007 |  | /s/ Jerry A. Little     |  | 
|      |  |             |  | Jerry A. Little         |  | 
|      |  |             |  | Chief Financial Officer |  | 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document.
Case 1:06-cv-00723-MHT-CSC Document 51 Filed 10/25/2007 Page 1 of 4
Case 1:06-cv-00723-MHT-CSC Document 51 Filed 10/25/2007 Page 2 of 4
Case 1:06-cv-00723-MHT-CSC Document 51 Filed 10/25/2007 Page 3 of 4
Case 1:06-cv-00723-MHT-CSC Document 51 Filed 10/25/2007 Page 4 of 4
exv10w8wc






EXHIBIT
10.8(c)









Richard H. Anderson

Chief Executive Officer




October 20, 2009




Mr. David R. Goode

Chairman, Personnel & Compensation Committee 

    of the Board of Directors

Delta Air Lines, Inc.

World Headquarters

Atlanta, Georgia 30320




Dear David:



Today we decided to eliminate from all future awards clauses providing for payment of excise tax
and related gross-up provisions imposed by Section 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code.



As you know, I do not have an employment agreement; however, I would like to waive all such
provisions in my current Award Agreements as well as the Officer and Director Severance Plan. I
realize that by taking this action, I am voluntarily giving up any protection from excise taxes I
currently have in the event of a change in control. I also understand and agree that by so doing,
I have not triggered the “Good Reason” clause in any Plan or Award Agreement.




Sincerely,




/s/ Richard H. Anderson