alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case 2:06-cr-00206-MHT-CSC Document 14 Filed 09/07/2006 Page 1 of 4
Case 2:06-cr-00206-MHT-CSC Document 14 Filed 09/07/2006 Page 2 of 4
Case 2:06-cr-00206-MHT-CSC Document 14 Filed 09/07/2006 Page 3 of 4
Case 2:06-cr-00206-MHT-CSC Document 14 Filed 09/07/2006 Page 4 of 4
Order entered November 29, 2018

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 18
- 00571
- CR WINDELL STOKES, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 422nd Ju dicial District Court

Kaufman County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 15
- 50472
- 422
- F



### O RDER Before the Court is appellant’s November 27, 2018 motion for leave to file his amended brief. Appellant’s motion is GRANTED

. We STRIKE appellant’s October 1, 2018 bri ef. Appellant’s amended brief tendered on November 5, 2018 is ORDERED filed as of the date of this order.
The State’s brief shall be due THIRTY DAYS from the date of this order.
/s/ CRAIG STODDART JUSTICE
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>6
<LEGEND> THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED 
FROM THE FORM 10-Q AS OF MARCH 31, 1997, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS 
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
<MULTIPLIER>1
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                  MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       3-MOS
<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST>           6,313,829
<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE>          3,287,752
<RECEIVABLES>                           0
<ASSETS-OTHER>                     10,752
<OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS>            3,717,432
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  7,015,936
<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES>                0
<SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT>                 0
<OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES>         464,442
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES>               464,442
<SENIOR-EQUITY>                         0
<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON>        9,577,571
<SHARES-COMMON-STOCK>             155,671
<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR>             155,671
<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT>               0
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII>                  0
<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS>                 0
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS>                0
<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC>       (3,026,077)
<NET-ASSETS>                    6,551,494
<DIVIDEND-INCOME>                       0
<INTEREST-INCOME>                  60,119
<OTHER-INCOME>                      5,172
<EXPENSES-NET>                    305,355
<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME>          (240,064)
<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT>            5,198
<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT>         (14,388)
<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS>            (249,254)
<EQUALIZATION>                          0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME>               0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS>                0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER>                   0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD>                 0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED>             0
<SHARES-REINVESTED>                     0
<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS>           (249,254)
<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR>                 0
<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR>               0
<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR>                 0
<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR>              0
<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES>              34,004
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      0
<GROSS-EXPENSE>                   309,550
<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS>            6,676,121
<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN>                  64
<PER-SHARE-NII>                        (1)
<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC>                 0 <F1>
<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND>                    0
<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS>               0
<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL>                    0
<PER-SHARE-NAV-END>                    62
<EXPENSE-RATIO>                       4.6
<AVG-DEBT-OUTSTANDING>                  0
<AVG-DEBT-PER-SHARE>                    0
<FN>
<F1>
A zero value is used since the change in net unrealized fair value is 
not allocated to General Partners and Limited Partners as it is not 
taxable.  Only taxable gains or losses are allocated in accordance with 
the Partnership Agreement.
</FN>

</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 420
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 420 appear at 64 FR 46114, Aug. 24, 1999.

§ 420.14 Review and approval of annual State applications and amendments to State plans. ( a ) After receipt of an application for financial assistance under this subpart and for approval of an amendment, if any, to a State plan, the cognizant Regional Office Director may request the State to submit within a reasonable period of time any revisions necessary to make the application complete and to bring the application into compliance with the requirements of subparts A and B of this part. The cognizant Regional Office Director shall attempt to resolve any dispute over the application informally and to seek voluntary compliance. If a State fails to submit timely appropriate revisions to complete an application or to bring it into compliance, the cognizant Regional Office Director may reject the application in a written decision, including a statement of reasons, which shall be subject to administrative review under § 420.19 of subparts A and B of this part.
( b ) On or before 60 days from the date that a timely filed application is complete, the cognizant Regional Office Director shall— ( 1 ) Approve the application in whole or in part to the extent that— ( i ) The application conforms to the requirements of subparts A and B of this part;
( ii ) The proposed program activities are consistent with a State's achievement of its energy conservation goals in accordance with § 420.13; and
( iii ) The provisions of the application regarding program activities satisfy the minimum requirements prescribed by § 420.15 and § 420.17 as applicable;
( 2 ) Approve the application in whole or in part subject to special conditions designed to ensure compliance with the requirements of subparts A and B of this part; or
( 3 ) Disapprove the application if it does not conform to the requirements of subparts A and B of this part.
[61 FR 35895, July 8, 1996, as amended at 62 FR 26727, May 14, 1997; 64 FR 46114, Aug. 24, 1999]
ex10-37.htm


    Exhibit 10.37

     

    Amendment
to

    Employment
Agreement

    


    This Amendment is made effective as of
November 2, 2009 by and between First Solar, Inc. a Delaware corporation having
its principal office at 350 West Washington Street, Suite 600, Tempe, Arizona
85281 (hereinafter “Employer”) and David Eaglesham (hereinafter
“Employee”)

    


    WITNESSETH:

    


    WHEREAS,
Employer and Employee are party to an Employment Agreement dated as of December
1, 2008 (the “Employment Agreement”);

     

    WHEREAS,
Employer has promoted Employee to a new position and adjusted Employee’s
compensation to reflect his new role;

     

    WHEREAS,
the parties wish to memorialize these action by amending the Employment
Agreement accordingly;

     

    NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the
foregoing premises, and the mutual covenants, terms and conditions set forth
herein, and intending to be legally bound hereby, Employer and Employee hereby
agree that the Employment Agreement is amended as provided herein.

    


    
      	
              1.

            	
              Section
      1.2 of the Employment Agreement is amended to replace the title “Vice President,
      Technology” with the title “Chief Technology
      Officer” and to replace the title of Employee’s supervisor from
      “President” to “Chief Executive
Officer”.

            


    

    


    
      	
              2.

            	
              Section
      2.1 of the Employment Agreement is amended to replace the stated Base
      Salary of “$304,052” with “$350,000”.

            


    

    


    
      	
              3.

            	
              Section
      2.2 of the Employment Agreement is amended to replace the annual bonus
      eligibility percentage from “fifty percent (50%)” to
      “sixty percent
      (60%)”

            


    

    


    
      	
              4.

            	
              Except
      as amended above, the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and
      effect.

            


    


    


    IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Employer has caused
this Agreement to be executed by one of its duly authorized officers and
Employee has individually executed this Agreement, each intending to be legally
bound, as of the date first above written.

    


    
      	
              EMPLOYER

            	
              EMPLOYEE

            
	
               

               

              /s/
      Robert J. Gillette

               

               

              Robert
      J. Gillette

              Chief
      Executive Officer

            	
               

               

               

              /s/
      David Eaglesham

               

              David
      Eaglesham

            
	 
      	 
      
	 
      	
              Date:  2/15/10
#### § 20.1802 Control of material not in storage.

The licensee shall control and maintain constant surveillance of licensed material that is in a controlled or unrestricted area and that is not in storage.
Exhibit 31.2.  CERTIFICATION  I, S. E. Parks, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this report of Questar Pipeline Company on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended June 30, 2008;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. [intentionally omitted];  4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and we have:  a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;  c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting.  5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):  a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.    November 6, 2008 /s/S. E. Parks S. E. Parks Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Case 3:06-cr-00199-MEF-CSC Document 2 Filed 08/03/2006 Page 1 of 1
Case 2:06-cv-00755-MHT-CSC Document 4 Filed 08/29/2006 Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 387 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 387

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                         July 27, 2005.
    Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it shall be in order 
without intervention of any point of order to consider in the House the bill 
(H.R. 3283) to enhance resources to enforce United States trade rights. The bill 
shall be considered as read. The amendment in the nature of a substitute printed 
in the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution shall be 
considered as adopted. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on 
the bill, as amended, to final passage without intervening motion except: (1) 
one hour of debate on the bill, as amended, equally divided and controlled by 
the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on Ways and Means; and 
(2) one motion to recommit with or without instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
§ 989.111 Independent producer and small cooperative producer. ( a ) *Independent producer* means any producer who is not a member of a cooperative bargaining association or a cooperative marketing association, nor has sold for cash to a cooperative marketing association.
( b ) *Small cooperative producer* means any producer who is a member of a cooperative marketing association which acquired less than 10 percent of total raisin acquisitions during the crop year preceding the year in which nominations are held.
[49 FR 18730, May 2, 1984]
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications.

 

 

I, Kunal K. Singh, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports onForm 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this reporton Form 10-K of the J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Trust2012-LC9 (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

 

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, takenas a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing andother information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the periodcovered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statementsrequired in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except asdisclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilledtheir obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and

 

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicingcriteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports onassessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securitiesrequired to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 ofRegulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as anexhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Anymaterial instances of noncompliance described in such reports have beendisclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied oninformation provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:

 

Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, NationalAssociation, as Master Servicer, Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as SpecialServicer, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee and CertificateAdministrator, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Custodian, PentalphaSurveillance LLC, as Senior Trust Advisor, Computershare Trust Company,National Association, as Servicing Function Participant for the CertificateAdministrator on and after November 1, 2021, and Computershare TrustCompany, National Association, as Servicing Function Participant for theCustodian on and after November 1, 2021.

 

 

 

Dated:March17, 2022

 

 

/s/ Kunal K. Singh

Kunal K. Singh

President and Chief Executive Officer

(seniorofficer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
#### § 981.89 Agents.

The Secretary may, by a designation in writing, name any person, including any officer or employee of the United States Government, or name any bureau or division of the United States Department of Agriculture, to act as his agent or representative in connection with any of the provisions of this subpart.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

 v ) CR. NO. 2:06-cr-202-WKW

)

EUGENE L. CLECKLER )

ORDER

It is ORDERED that the sentencing scheduled for June 1, 2007, is CONTINUED to June 

 

15, 2007, at 2:30 p.m. in Courtroom 2-E of the Frank M. Johnson, Jr. U.S. Courthouse Complex,

One Church Street, Montgomery, Alabama.

DONE this 9 day of May, 2007. th

 /s/ W. Keith Watkins 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

 

Case 2:06-cr-00202-WKW-CSC Document 102 Filed 05/09/2007 Page 1 of 1
```

[109th Congress Public Law 426]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ426.109]

[[Page 120 STAT. 2911]]

Public Law 109-426
109th Congress

                                 An Act

 
   To reauthorize permanently the use of penalty and franked mail in 
        efforts relating to the location and recovery of missing 
            children. <<NOTE: Dec. 20, 2006 -  [H.R. 4416]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. REPEAL OF TERMINATION OF AUTHORITY TO USE PENALTY AND 
                              FRANKED MAIL TO LOCATE AND RECOVER 
                              MISSING CHILDREN.

    Public Law 99-87 is amended by striking section 5 (39 U.S.C. 3220 
note).

    Approved December 20, 2006.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 4416:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 152 (2006):
            June 26, considered and passed House.
            Dec. 7, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTE C TION AGENCY WASHINGTO N , D.C

. 20460


### OCT 0 

## 9 2014

Re: Completeness Determination for SNAP Submission for FEA-11 00 Dear [ OFFICE OF A I R A N D RAD I ATION

Thank you for submission to the Envirorunental Protection Agency. The E PA established the Significant New Alternatives Policy program to implement section 612 of the Clean Air Act. Your submi ssion and the most recent additional information received on February 4, 2014, have been reviewed for completeness. We have found the information to be comp lete. Here is a summary of information concerning your submission: Substitute name: FEA-11 00 Sec tor : Foam Blowing End -uses:
• Rigid po l yurethan e appliance foam • Rigid polyurethane spray, commercial refrigeration , and sandwich panels • Flexible polyurethane • Integral skin polyurethane • Rigid polyurethane slabstock and other • Rigid polyurethane and polyisocyanurate laminated boardstock • Phenolic insulation board and bunstock Date most recent information received: February 4, 2014 Status of submission: Comp l ete

I nterne t Add r ess ( UR L) • h ttp ://www

. e pa . gov Re c y c led / R ec y c l a ble • Pnnted w1th Vegetable O i l B ased In ks on 100% Postconsume r. Process Chlo r i ne Free Recycled Paper

### Based o n review of the most recent information , your SNAP submission has been fo und complete. Pending SNAP 's decis i on concerning th e s ubstitu te ' s acceptability, yo u may sell and import FEA-11 00 

### in the en d-uses listed above continge nt upon meeting the requirements of EP A 's New Chemicals Program under the T oxic Substances Control A ct. If y ou have an y question s about your submission, please contact me at vondemhagen.rebecca @ epa.gov or by p hone at 202-343-9445. Sincerely ,

# ·~~ R ebecca von dem Hagen Al ternative s and Emissions Reduction Branc h Stratospheric Protection Di vi sion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

M IDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABA M A

OFFICE OF THE CLERK

POST OFFICE BOX 711

MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA 36101-0711

DEBRA P. HACKETT, CLERK

TELEPHONE (334) 954-3600

December 21, 2006

NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT

Re: Angela Price v. Roanoke City Board of Education

Civil Action No. #3:06-cv-00742-MEF

The above-styled case has been reassigned to Chief Judge Mark E. Fuller.

Please note that the case number is now #3:06-cv-00742-MEF. This new case number should be

used on all future correspondence and pleadings in this action.

 

Case 3:06-cv-00742-MEF-WC Document 7 Filed 12/21/2006 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

 )

vs. ) CR. NO. 2:06cr200-WHA

 )

HECTOR R. SILVA ) 

ORDER

Due to a conflict which has arisen in the court’s calendar, the sentencing of the

Defendant, previously scheduled for March 21, 2007, is RESCHEDULED for March 22, 2007,

at 10:00 a.m. in District Courtroom 2-C, Frank M. Johnson, Jr. United States Courthouse

Complex, One Church Street, Montgomery, Alabama.

DONE this 21st day of February, 2007.

/s/ W. Harold Albritton 

W. HAROLD ALBRITTON

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cr-00200-WHA-CSC Document 97 Filed 02/21/2007 Page 1 of 1
#### § 986.16 Grade and size.

*Grade and size* means any of the officially established grades of pecans and any of the officially established sizes of pecans as set forth in the United States standards for inshell and shelled pecans or amendments thereto, or modifications thereof, or other variations of grade and size based thereon recommended by the Council and approved by the Secretary.