alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
H. Res. 339

In the House of Representatives, U.S., 

June 30, 2005.

Whereas on June 23, 2005, the San Antonio Spurs won the 

National Basketball Association’s (NBA) Championship 

with an 81–74 victory over the Detroit Pistons; 

Whereas the Spurs’ win resulted in their third NBA championship title in franchise history; 

Whereas the Spurs competed against the Pistons to win the 

series 4–3; 

Whereas the Detroit Pistons and their coach, Larry Brown, 

put up a battle worthy of a championship series; 

Whereas under the guidance of Coach Gregg Popovich, the 

Spurs’ Tim Duncan, Manu Ginobili, Tony Parker, Robert 

Horry, Bruce Bowen, Nazr Mohammed, Brent Barry, 

Beno Udrih, Rasho Nesterovic, Glenn Robinson, Devin 

Brown, and Tony Massenburg played valiantly to bring 

the NBA trophy back home to San Antonio; 

Whereas congratulations are due as well to the Spurs’ owners, Peter and Julianna Holt, and all of the other people 

in the Spurs’ organization. 

Whereas Tim Duncan was for the third time named the 

finals’ Most Valuable Player following the Spurs’ victory; 
2

•HRES 339 EH 

Whereas Coach Gregg Popovich is only one of two active 

coaches to win three championship titles and only the 

fifth in league history; and 

Whereas San Antonio has the best hometown crowd in the 

league and the Alamo City is the perfect setting for a 

championship celebration: Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives congratulates the San Antonio Spurs and Coach Gregg Popovich for 

another exciting basketball season and for winning the 2005 

National Basketball Association Championship. 

Attest:

Clerk.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

NORTHERN DIVISION

ALMA T. McBROOM, *

PLAINTIFF *

VS. * CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:06 CV767-F

JOHN E. POTTER, POSTMASTER *

GENERAL UNITED STATES POSTAL *

SERVICE; NATIONAL POSTAL *

MAIL HANDLERS UNION; THE *

MONTGOMERY ALABAMA AREA *

LOCAL AMERICAN POSTAL WORKERS *

UNION, AFL-CIO; and VANESSA *

GORDON, *

DEFENDANTS *

CORPORATE CONFLICIT/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT 

In accordance with the order of this Court, the 

undersigned party or parties to the above-captioned matter 

do hereby make the following disclosure concerning parent 

companies, subsidiaries, affiliates, partnership, joint 

ventures, debtor, creditor’s committee, or other entities 

reportable under provisions of the Middle District of 

Alabama’s General Order No. 3047: 

X There are no entities to be reported

-orThe following entities are hereby reported: 

___________________________________________

___________________________________________

___________________________________________

3/29/07 /s/ William P. Roberts, II

DATE SIGNATURE OF COUNSEL

COUNSEL FOR:

VANESSA GORDON

HOWELL, SARTO & HOWELL

Case 2:06-cv-00767-MEF-SRW Document 54 Filed 03/29/2007 Page 1 of 2
P.O. Box 681864

147 E. Main St.

Prattville, AL 36068-1864

(334)365-2286

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that I have served a copy of the 

foregoing upon the following by U. S. Mail, first class, 

postage pre-paid and through the Court’s electronic filing 

system: 

Debrorah Nicknson 

2820 Fairlane Drive, A-10

Montgomery, AL 36116

Brenda C. Zwack 

O’DONNELL, SCHWARTZ, & ANDERSON, P.C.

1300 L. Street NW, Suite 1200

Washington, DC 20005-4126

Patrick Nakamura 

NAKAMURA, QUINN & WALLS LLP 

2204 Lakeshore Drive, Suite 130

Birmingham, AL 35209

Dated: March 29, 2007 /s/ William P. Roberts, II

Case 2:06-cv-00767-MEF-SRW Document 54 Filed 03/29/2007 Page 2 of 2
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**








Certification
      of Periodic Financial Report








Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. 1350, the undersigned, Louis P. Scheps, the President and Chief
      Executive Officer, and Jeffery A. Baird, the Chief Financial Officer of CAS
      Medical Systems, Inc., (the “issuer”), do hereby certify that the report on Form
      10-QSB accompanying this certification (the “report”) fully complies with the
      requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
      (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that information contained in the report fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the issuer.











/s/
      Louis
      P. Scheps


Louis
      P.
      Scheps


Chairman
      of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer


CAS
      Medical Systems, Inc.


November
      7, 2006

















/s/
      Jeffery A. Baird


Jeffery
      A. Baird


Chief
      Financial Officer


CAS
      Medical Systems, Inc.


November
      7, 2006
IV 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 174 

Congratulating the people of Malaysia and honoring Datuk Siti Norma Binti 

Yaacob regarding her recent appointment as the first female Chief Judge 

of Malaya, Malaysia. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 17, 2005 

Mr. MEEKS of New York (for himself, Mrs. JONES of Ohio, Ms. EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON of Texas, Mr. MCNULTY, Mr. SESSIONS, Mr. CONYERS, 

Mr. CROWLEY, Mr. JEFFERSON, Mr. ISSA, Mr. SANDERS, Ms. 

BORDALLO, and Ms. SOLIS) submitted the following resolution; which was 

referred to the Committee on International Relations 

RESOLUTION 

Congratulating the people of Malaysia and honoring Datuk 

Siti Norma Binti Yaacob regarding her recent appointment as the first female Chief Judge of Malaya, Malaysia. 

Whereas during Women’s History Month and International 

Women’s Day held on March 8th, 2005, people around 

the world came together to commemorate women’s rights 

and peace as well as to honor their accomplishments; 

Whereas on February 8, 2005, the Government of Malaysia 

for the first time appointed a female judge, Datuk Siti 

Norma Binti Yaacob, as Chief Judge of Malaya, the third 

highest position in the nation’s judiciary; 
2 

•HRES 174 IH 

Whereas Datuk Siti Norma Yaacob was also the only female 

High Court judge in the 1990s and went on to create history as the first woman to be appointed a Court of Appeals judge in 1994, and subsequently a Federal Court 

judge in 2001; 

Whereas she made history as the first woman to have been 

appointed to an executive position in the judiciary when 

she was appointed Senior Assistant Registrar for the 

Federal Court in June 1963; 

Whereas she was born on July 6, 1940, in Seremban, Negeri 

Sembilan, Malaysia and received her early education at 

Malay School Rahang, Convent of the Holy Infant Jesus 

and King George V, Seremban, and later obtained the degree of Barrister-at-Law of the Honorable Society of 

Gray’s Inn, London; 

Whereas she serves as a role model for millions of Malaysian 

women and thus contributes tremendously to the advancement of women’s rights and social status in the 

world as well as Malaysia; and 

Whereas the Government of Malaysia is committed in ensuring that its judiciary system is independent, that women’s rights and advancements are promoted, and that 

human rights of every citizens are protected: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) congratulates the people of Malaysia and 

3 honors Datuk Siti Norma Yaacob on becoming the 

4 first female Chief Judge of Malaya, the third highest 

5 position in the nation’s judiciary; 
3 

•HRES 174 IH 

1 (2) recognizes the important contribution 

2 Datuk Siti Norma Yaacob has made to Malaysia’s 

3 judiciary system and to the advancement of women’s 

4 right in Malaysia; and 

5 (3) commends the Government of Malaysia for 

6 its effort to further pursue the emancipation and 

7 empowerment of women and protect the rights of 

8 women in Malaysia. 

Æ
EX-31 Rule13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications.

 

 

I, Kunal K. Singh,certify that:

 

1. I have reviewedthis report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed inrespect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of the J.P. MorganChase Commercial Mortgage Securities Trust 2012‐LC9 (the "ExchangeAct periodic reports");

 

2. Based on myknowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3. Based on myknowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required tobe provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is includedin the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4. Based on myknowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report underItem 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Actperiodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under theservicing agreements in all material respects; and

 

5. All of the reportson assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securitiesand their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance withservicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in thisreport in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwisedisclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described insuch reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving thecertifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me bythe following unaffiliated parties:

 

Midland LoanServices, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer,Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as Special Servicer, Wells Fargo Bank, NationalAssociation, as Trustee and Certificate Administrator, Wells Fargo Bank,National Association, as Custodian, and Pentalpha Surveillance LLC, as SeniorTrust Advisor.

 

 

 

Dated: March 21, 2019

 

 

/s/ Kunal K. Singh

 

 

President and ChiefExecutive Officer

(seniorofficer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 32 (Thursday, February 18, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 7294-7295]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-3131]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL CREDIT UNION ADMINISTRATION


Sunshine Act; Notice of Agency Meeting

Time and Date: 10 a.m., Thursday, February 18, 2010.

Place: Board Room, 7th Floor, Room 7047, 1775 Duke Street, Alexandria, 
VA 22314-3428.

Status: Open.

Matters to be Considered: 
    1. Board Briefing. Interim Final Rule--Section 701.34 of NCUA's 
Rules and Regulations, Secondary Capital Accounts for Low-Income Credit 
Unions.
    2. Insurance Fund Report.

Recess: 11 a.m.

[[Page 7295]]


Time and Date: 11:15 a.m., Thursday, February 18, 2010.

Place: Board Room, 7th Floor, Room 7047, 1775 Duke Street, Alexandria, 
VA 22314-3428.

Status:  Closed.

Matters to be Considered: 
    1. Consideration of Supervisory Activities. Closed pursuant to 
Exemptions (8), (9)(A)(ii) and 9(B).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary Rupp, Secretary of the Board, 
Telephone: 703-518-6304.

Mary Rupp,
Board Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-3131 Filed 2-16-10; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE P
§ 25.35 Classified visits. ( a ) The number of classified visits must be held to a minimum. The licensee, certificate holder, applicant for a standard design certification under part 52 of this chapter (including an applicant after the Commission has adopted a final standard design certification rule under part 52 of this chapter), or other facility, or an applicant for or holder of a standard design approval under part 52 of this chapter shall determine that the visit is necessary and that the purpose of the visit cannot be achieved without access to, or disclosure of, classified information. All classified visits require advance notification to, and approval of, the organization to be visited. In urgent cases, visit information may be furnished by telephone and confirmed in writing.
( b ) Representatives of the Federal Government, when acting in their official capacities as inspectors, investigators, or auditors, may visit a licensee, certificate holder, or other facility without furnishing advanced notification, provided these representatives present appropriate Government credentials upon arrival. Normally, however, Federal representatives will provide advance notification in the form of an NRC Form 277, “Request for Visit or Access Approval,” with the “need-to-know” certified by the appropriate NRC office exercising licensing or regulatory authority and verification of an NRC access authorization by the Division of Facilities and Security.
( c ) The licensee, certificate holder, or others shall include the following information on all Visit Authorization Letters (VAL) which they prepare. ( 1 ) Visitor's name, address, and telephone number and certification of the level of the facility security clearance;
( 2 ) Name, date and place of birth, and citizenship of the individual intending to visit;
( 3 ) Certification of the proposed visitor's personnel clearance and any special access authorizations required for the visit;
( 4 ) Name of person(s) to be visited;
( 5 ) Purpose and sufficient justification for the visit to allow for a determination of the necessity of the visit; and
( 6 ) Date or period during which the VAL is to be valid.
( d ) Classified visits may be arranged for a 12 month period. The requesting facility shall notify all places honoring these visit arrangements of any change in the individual's status that will cause the visit request to be canceled before its normal termination date.
( e ) The responsibility for determining need-to-know in connection with a classified visit rests with the individual who will disclose classified information during the visit. The licensee, certificate holder or other facility shall establish procedures to ensure positive identification of visitors before the disclosure of any classified information.
[62 FR 17689, Apr. 11, 1997, as amended at 64 FR 15649, Apr. 1, 1999; 72 FR 49488, Aug. 28, 2007]
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED November 30, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-40297 Summary Calendar

CHARLES CLAY WARNER, JR., Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus ZELDA G. GLASS, Individual Capacity; DIRK GRAY, Individual Capacity; FRANK WARNER, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE - INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION COMPANY DEPARTMENTS, Defendants-Appellees.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:03-CV-15

-------------------- Before GARZA, DeMOSS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Charles Clay Warner, Jr., Texas state prisoner #502362, appeals the district court’s dismissal without prejudice of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint for failure to pay the partial filing fee assessed by the magistrate judge. Warner argues that the district court abused its discretion in dismissing the complaint because the prison custodian of his trust account failed to perform its obligation to make the payment. He further arguesNo. 04-40297 -2- that the district court did not give him an adequate opportunity to comply with the requirement. Although the district court dismissed Warner’s suit without prejudice, he is effectively barred from refiling by the two-year statute of limitations. See Burrell v. Newsome , 883 F.2d 416, 418 (5th Cir. 1989). The record does not show that Warner’s failure was the result of contumacious behavior or an attempt to delay the proceedings. See McNeal v. Papsan , 842 F.2d 787, 790-92 (5th Cir. 1988). The record also does not show that the court considered lesser sanctions before dismissing Warner’s lawsuit.
See Long v. Simmons , 77 F.3d 878, 880 (5th Cir. 1996). The judgment of the district court dismissing Warner’s complaint is VACATED, and the case is REMANDED for further proceedings. Warner is cautioned that this opinion does not excuse him from compliance with the orders issued by the district court if the court elects to reinstate those orders upon remand. Warner is further cautioned that a failure to comply with the district court’s orders in the future may result in dismissal of his lawsuit.
VACATED AND REMANDED.
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

No. 21

- 11005 Summary Calendar

**United States of America,**

Plaintiff

— Appellee **,**

versus

**Bernice Lee Woodson, Jr.,**

Defendant

— Appellant

**.**

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:20

- CR

- 32

- 13

Before **Jolly, Oldham,** and **Wilson,** Circuit Judges

**. Per Curiam**  **:** *

The attorney appointed to represent Bernice Lee Woodson, Jr., has
moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Woodson’s construed motion for leave to file an out

- of

- time

* Pursuant to **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in **5th Cir cuit**  **R ule**  47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED September 15, 2022
Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 21-11005 Document: 00516472950 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/15/2022No. 21

- 11005

2 response is **GRANTED** . We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein , as well as Woodson ’s response . We
concur wit h counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to
withdraw is **GRANTED** , counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is **DISMISSED**

. See **5th Cir. R** 

**.** 42. 2. Woodson’s motion for the appointment of new counsel is **DENIED** as untimely. S ee United States v. Wagner , 158 F.3d 901, 902

- 03 (5th Cir. 1998)

. Case: 21-11005 Document: 00516472950 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/15/2022
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION

J.B., a minor child, by and )

through his next friend, )

Addie Ward, on behalf of )

himself and all others )

similarly situated, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

v. ) 2:06cv755-MHT

) 

WALTER WOOD, in his )

individual capacity, )

)

Defendant. )

J.B., a minor child, by and )

through his next friend, )

Addie Ward, on behalf of )

himself and all others )

similarly situated, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

v. ) 2:06cv908-MHT

) 

WALTER WOOD, in his )

individual capacity, )

)

Defendant. )

Case 2:06-cv-00755-MHT-CSC Document 18 Filed 01/30/2007 Page 1 of 2
ORDER

It is ORDERED that the motion for extension of time

(doc. no. 17) is granted.

DONE, this the 30th day of January, 2007.

 /s/ Myron H. Thompson 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00755-MHT-CSC Document 18 Filed 01/30/2007 Page 2 of 2
#### In the Matter of the Commissioner of Social Services of Ulster County, on Behalf of Diann F. Montgomery, Respondent, v Kenley Powell, Appellant.

Submitted October 9, 2007;

decided November 19, 2007

Reported below, 39 AD3d 946.

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 451 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
H. Res. 451

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                         July 18, 2017.
    Resolved, That at any time after adoption of this resolution the Speaker 
may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XVIII, declare the House resolved into the 
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of the 
bill (H.R. 806) to facilitate efficient State implementation of ground-level 
ozone standards, and for other purposes. The first reading of the bill shall be 
dispensed with. All points of order against consideration of the bill are 
waived. General debate shall be confined to the bill and shall not exceed one 
hour equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of 
the Committee on Energy and Commerce. After general debate the bill shall be 
considered for amendment under the five-minute rule. In lieu of the amendment in 
the nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on Energy and Commerce 
now printed in the bill, it shall be in order to consider as an original bill 
for the purpose of amendment under the five-minute rule an amendment in the 
nature of a substitute consisting of the text of Rules Committee Print 115-26. 
That amendment in the nature of a substitute shall be considered as read. All 
points of order against that amendment in the nature of a substitute are waived. 
No amendment to that amendment in the nature of a substitute shall be in order 
except those printed in the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this 
resolution. Each such amendment may be offered only in the order printed in the 
report, may be offered only by a Member designated in the report, shall be 
considered as read, shall be debatable for the time specified in the report 
equally divided and controlled by the proponent and an opponent, shall not be 
subject to amendment, and shall not be subject to a demand for division of the 
question in the House or in the Committee of the Whole. All points of order 
against such amendments are waived. At the conclusion of consideration of the 
bill for amendment the Committee shall rise and report the bill to the House 
with such amendments as may have been adopted. Any Member may demand a separate 
vote in the House on any amendment adopted in the Committee of the Whole to the 
bill or to the amendment in the nature of a substitute made in order as original 
text. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and 
amendments thereto to final passage without intervening motion except one motion 
to recommit with or without instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
#### In the Matter of Robert M. Lewis, Appellant, v Glenn S. Goord, as Commissioner of Correctional Services, et al., Respondents.

[813 NYS2d 828]

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (McNamara, J.), entered October 6, 2005 in Albany County, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of the Board of Parole denying petitioner’s request for parole release.

Since the February 2004 determination giving rise to this CPLR article 78 proceeding, petitioner has reappeared before the Board of Parole and his request for parole release has again been denied. Given petitioner’s subsequent reappearance before the Board in February 2006, the instant matter must be dismissed as moot *(see Matter of Ayala v New York State Bd. of Parole,*17 AD3d 946 [2005]). Furthermore, we are unpersuaded by petitioner’s assertion that this matter presents an exception to the mootness doctrine *(see Matter of Hearst Corp. v Clyne,*50 NY2d 707, 714-715 [1980]).

Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Crew III, Peters and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs.
#### § 473.21 Supplemental information and rebuttal.

The manager may request additional information from an applicant or any interested person who files an objection under § 473.20.