alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# SUBCHAPTER I - DEPARTMENT SUPPLEMENTARY REGULATIONS

- PART 870 [RESERVED] 
- PART 871 - VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION AND EMPLOYMENT PROGRAMS 
- PART 873 - SIMPLIFIED PROCEDURES FOR HEALTH-CARE RESOURCES 
- PARTS 874-899 [RESERVED] 

- PART 870 [RESERVED]    
- PART 871 - VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION AND EMPLOYMENT PROGRAMS    - Subpart 871.1 - [Reserved]
  - Subpart 871.2 - Vocational Rehabilitation and Employment Service     - 871.200   Scope of subpart.
    - 871.201   General.
    - 871.201-1   Requirements for the use of contracts.
    - 871.205   Proration of charges.
    - 871.206   Other fees and charges.
    - 871.207   Payment of tuition or fees.
    - 871.208   Rehabilitation facilities.
    - 871.209   Prohibition on advertising - training of Veterans.
    - 871.210   PART 872 [RESERVED]
- PART 873 - SIMPLIFIED PROCEDURES FOR HEALTH-CARE RESOURCES    - 873.101   Policy.
  - 873.102   Definitions.
  - 873.103   Priority sources.
  - 873.104   Competition requirements.
  - 873.105   Acquisition planning.
  - 873.106   Exchanges with industry before receipt of proposals.
  - 873.107   Socioeconomic programs.
  - 873.108   Publicizing contract actions.
  - 873.109   General requirements for acquisition of health-care resources.
  - 873.110   Solicitation provisions.
  - 873.111   Acquisition strategies for health-care resources.
  - 873.112   Evaluation information.
  - 873.113   Exchanges with offerors.
  - 873.114   Best value pool.
  - 873.115   Proposal revisions.
  - 873.116   Source selection decision.
  - 873.117   Award to successful offeror.
  - 873.118   Debriefings.
- PARTS 874-899 [RESERVED]
#### KINSELLA et al., Respondents, v. HAMM, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department.

January 6, 1915.)

Action by John J. Kinsella and another against Mary M. Hamm.

No opinion. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs.
PGI 222.101-3 Reporting labor disputes.

The contract administration office shall—

(1) Notify the labor advisor, the contracting officer, and the head of the contracting activity when

interference is likely; and

(2) Disseminate information on labor disputes in accordance with departmental procedures.

PGI 222.101-3-70 Impact of labor disputes on defense programs.

Parent topic: PGI 222.101 Labor relations.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v ) CR. NO. 2:06cr206-MHT

)

ALETHIA ADRIANNE SCOTT )

ORDER

Now pending before the court is motion for an extension of time to file pretrial

motions (doc. # 30) filed by the defendant. The government has no objection to the motion.

Accordingly, upon consideration of the motion, and for good cause, it is

ORDERED that the motion for an extension of time to file pretrial motions (doc. # 30)

be and is hereby GRANTED and the defendant’s time for filing pretrial motions be and is

hereby EXTENDED from September 21, 2006, until September 22, 2006.

Done this 22 day of September, 2006. nd

 /s/Charles S. Coody 

CHARLES S. COODY

CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:06-cr-00206-MHT-CSC Document 32 Filed 09/22/2006 Page 1 of 1
§ 983.155 Reinspection. ( a ) Any lot of inshell pistachios that is pin-picked, hand-sorted, color-sorted, and/or resized is considered to be “materially changed.” Pistachios which are roasted, salted, flavored, air-legged, dyed, color-coated, cleaned, and otherwise subjected to similar processes are not considered to be materially changed.
( b ) Each handler who handles pistachios shall cause any lot or portion of a lot initially certified for aflatoxin, and subsequently materially changed, to be reinspected for aflatoxin and certified as a new lot or new lots: *Provided*, That, handlers exempted from order requirements under § 983.92 are exempt from all reinspection requirements.
[70 FR 61226, Oct. 21, 2005, as amended at 71 FR 51987, Sept. 1, 2006; 72 FR 69141, Dec. 7, 2007. Redesignated and amended at 74 FR 56530, Nov. 2, 2009]
Case 2:06-mj-00082-SRW Document 12 Filed 08/30/2006 Page 1 of 1
Subpart 1805.3—Synopses of Contract

Awards

Parent topic: PART 1805—PUBLICIZING CONTRACT ACTIONS

1805.303 Announcement of contract awards.

(a)(i) In lieu of the threshold cited in FAR 5.303(a), a NASA Headquarters public announcement is

required for award of contract actions that have a total anticipated value, including unexercised

options, of $5 million or greater.
EX-10.1







EXHIBIT 10.1



10.1 Executive Employment Agreement with Douglas E. Klint, dated December 15, 2002 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.14 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended
December 31, 2002).
§ 990.25 Standards of performance for detecting total delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) concentration levels. Analytical testing for purposes of determining total THC in cannabis plants shall meet the standards in this section. ( a ) Laboratory quality assurance must ensure the validity and reliability of test results.
( b ) Analytical method selection, validation, and verification must ensure that the testing method used is appropriate (fit for purpose), and that the laboratory can successfully perform the testing.
( c ) The demonstration of testing validity must ensure consistent, accurate analytical performance.
( d ) Method performance specifications must ensure analytical tests are sufficiently sensitive for the purposes of the detectability requirements of this part.
( e ) Laboratory must have an effective disposal procedure for non-compliant samples that do not meet the requirements of this part.
( f ) Measurement of uncertainty (MU) must be estimated and reported with test results. Laboratories shall use appropriate, validated methods and procedures for all testing activities and evaluate measurement of uncertainty.
( g ) At a minimum, analytical testing of samples for total THC must use post-decarboxylation or other similarly reliable methods approved by the Secretary. The testing methodology must consider the potential conversion of THCA in hemp into THC and the test result must reflect the total available THC derived from the sum of the THC and THCA content. Testing methodologies meeting the requirements of this paragraph (g) include, but are not limited to, gas or liquid chromatography with detection. ( 1 ) The total THC shall be determined and reported on a dry weight basis. Additionally, measurement of uncertainty (MU) must be estimated and reported with test results. Laboratories shall use appropriate, validated methods and procedures for all testing activities and evaluate measurement of uncertainty.
( 2 ) Any sample test result exceeding the acceptable hemp THC level shall be conclusive evidence that the lot represented by the sample is not in compliance with this part.
( 3 ) After December 31, 2022, USDA licensees may only use laboratories registered with the DEA to conduct testing under this section.
2007-2010.

#### State v. Brown.

Montgomery App. No. 21540, 2007-Ohio-2098. On motion for stay of court of appeals’ judgment. Motion denied.
Case 3:06-cv-00622-WKW-SRW Document 66 Filed 11/29/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 3:06-cv-00622-WKW-SRW Document 66 Filed 11/29/2007 Page 2 of 2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Area 6 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comment, ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Tuesday, March 2, 2010.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Janice Spinks at 1-888-912-1227 or 206-220-6098.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) that an open meeting of the Area 6 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be held Tuesday, March 2, 2010, at 1 p.m. Pacific Time via telephone conference. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited conference lines, notification of intent to participate must be made with Janice Spinks. For more information, please contact Ms. Spinks at 1-888-912-1227 or 206-220-6098, or write TAP Office, 915 2nd Avenue, MS W-406, Seattle, WA 98174 or post comments to the Web site:                     *http://www.improveirs.org.*

The agenda will include various IRS issues.

Dated: February 12, 2010.

Linda Rivera,

Senior Program Analyst, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.

[FR Doc. 2010-3183 Filed 2-18-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000764579
<NAME> CAS MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           1,657,477
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      929,967
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                        956,514
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,740,781
<PP&E>                                           2,431,838
<DEPRECIATION>                                     959,298
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   5,221,520
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,185,338
<BONDS>                                                  0
<COMMON>                                            37,317
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,301,501
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     5,221,520
<SALES>                                          5,210,630
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,443,003
<CGS>                                            2,178,635
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,072,316
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   410,463
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (84,657)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    856,246
<INCOME-TAX>                                       343,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                513,246
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                       513,246
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          .06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          .05
        

</TABLE>
Subpart 1530.3 - CAS Contract Requirements

[Reserved]

Parent topic: PART 1530 - COST ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
PGI 222.404-2 General requirements.       (c)(5) Clarification concerning the proper application of wage rate schedules to the type or types of construction involved shall be obtained from—          (A) For the Army - The appropriate district commander, Corps of Engineers.          (B) For the Navy - The cognizant Naval Facilities Engineering Command division.          (C) For the Air Force - The appropriate Regional Industrial Relations Office.    **Parent topic:** PGI 222.404 Construction Wage Rate Requirements statute wage determinations.
PGI 208.405-6 Limiting sources.       For an order or blanket purchase agreement (BPA) exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold that is a follow-on to an order or BPA for the same supply or services previously issued based on a limiting sources justification citing the authority at FAR 8.405-6(a)(1)(i)(B) or (C)—          (1) The limited sources justification shall include a copy of the previous justification to assist the approval authority in determining whether the planned actions to remove any barriers that led to the restricted consideration cited on the previous justification were completed; and          (2) The approval authority shall determine whether the planned actions were completed. If the actions were not completed, the justification for the follow-on action must be approved by the approval authority one-level above the approval authority for the previous justification (see FAR 8.405-6(d)). If the previous justification was approved by the Senior Procurement Executive (SPE), the approval remains at the SPE level.    **Parent topic:** PGI 208.405 Reserved
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 11**  **- 6894** 

KEITH OAKLEY , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. J. MICHAEL STOUFFER; BOBBY SHERARIN, Warden , Defendants

- Appellees
.

Appeal from the United States District Court fo r the District of Maryland , at Greenbelt
. Alexander Williams, Jr. , District Judge. ( 8:10

- cv - 02118

- AW )

Submitted : November 17, 2011 Decided: November 23, 2011

Before KING, DAVIS, and WYNN , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opini on . Keith Oakley, Appellant Pro Se. Stephanie Judith Lanes Weber, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee s . Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Keith Oakley appeals the d istrict court ’ s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (200 6 ) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Oakley v. Stouffer , No. 8:10

- cv - 02118

- AW (D. Md . June 29, 2011) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.

AFFIRMED
Case 1:06-cv-00737-WKW-SRW Document 63 Filed 04/20/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:06-cv-00737-WKW-SRW Document 63 Filed 04/20/2007 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:06-cv-00737-WKW-SRW Document 63-2 Filed 04/20/2007 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:06-cv-00737-WKW-SRW Document 63-2 Filed 04/20/2007 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:06-cv-00737-WKW-SRW Document 63-2 Filed 04/20/2007 Page 3 of 3
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

 )

 v. ) 

) 1:06-cr-201-WHA

OSCAR MARTINEZ-RAMIREZ )

GOVERNMENT’S MOTION FOR DOWNWARD DEPARTURE

AND CERTIFICATION OF SUBSTANTIAL ASSISTANCE

PURSUANT TO § 5K1.1, UNITED STATES SENTENCING GUIDELINES

COMES NOW the United States of America, by and through Leura G. Canary,

United States Attorney for the Middle District of Alabama, and files the above-captioned

motion, and as reasons therefore, submits the following:

1. Defendant entered a plea of guilty under Rule 11(c)(1)(C) to an indictment

charging violations of Title 21, United States Code, Section 846 pursuant to a plea

agreement.

2. Defendant agreed to cooperate with the Government in the instant cause and

in subsequent investigations as necessary, and to waive his rights to appeal or collaterally

attack the guilty plea or sentence.

3. The United States submits the defendant has cooperated with the United States

and has abided by the terms of his plea agreement. The assistance provided by

Defendant should be considered substantial.

4. The Government is satisfied that Defendant is entitled to be considered for a

reduction of sentence under § 5K1.1 U.S.S.G., and Title 18, United States Code, Section

3553(e) and moves this Court to reduce the applicable offense level of Defendant by three

levels. 

Case 1:06-cr-00201-WHA-CSC Document 54 Filed 05/07/2007 Page 1 of 3
Respectfully submitted, this the 7th day of May, 2007.

LEURA G. CANARY

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

s/A. Clark Morris

A. CLARK MORRIS

Assistant United States Attorney

One Court Square, Suite 201

Montgomery, AL 36104

Phone: (334)223-7280

Fax: (334)223-7135

E-mail: clark. morris@usdoj.gov

ASB-1613-N77A

Case 1:06-cr-00201-WHA-CSC Document 54 Filed 05/07/2007 Page 2 of 3
3

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

 )

 v. ) 

) 1:06-cr-201-WHA

OSCAR MARTINEZ-RAMIREZ )

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on May 7, 2007, I electronically filed the foregoing with the

Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing to

the following: Richard Keith, Esquire.

Respectfully submitted,

s/A. Clark Morris

A. CLARK MORRIS

Assistant United States Attorney

One Court Square, Suite 201

Montgomery, AL 36104

Phone: (334)223-7280

Fax: (334)223-7135

E-mail: clark. morris@usdoj.gov

ASB-1613-N77A

Case 1:06-cr-00201-WHA-CSC Document 54 Filed 05/07/2007 Page 3 of 3
Editorial Note on Part 26
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 26 appear at 87 FR 71455, Nov. 22, 2022.

§ 26.59 Authorization reinstatement. ( a ) In order to grant authorization to an individual whose authorization has been interrupted for a period of more than 30 days but no more than 365 days and whose last period of authorization was terminated favorably, the licensee or other entity shall ensure that— ( 1 ) A self-disclosure has been obtained and reviewed under the applicable requirements of § 26.61;
( 2 ) A suitable inquiry has been completed under the requirements of § 26.63 within 5 business days of reinstating authorization. If the suitable inquiry is not completed within 5 business days due to circumstances that are outside of the licensee's or other entity's control and the licensee or other entity is not aware of any potentially disqualifying information regarding the individual within the past 5 years, the licensee or other entity may maintain the individual's authorization for an additional 5 business days. If the suitable inquiry is not completed within 10 business days of reinstating authorization, the licensee or other entity shall administratively withdraw the individual's authorization until the suitable inquiry is completed;
( 3 ) The individual has been subject to pre-access drug and alcohol testing under the applicable requirements of § 26.65; and
( 4 ) The individual is subject to random drug and alcohol testing under the applicable requirements of § 26.67.
( b ) If a licensee or other entity administratively withdraws an individual's authorization under paragraph (a)(2) of this section, and until the suitable inquiry is completed, the licensee or other entity may not record the administrative action to withdraw authorization as an unfavorable termination and may not disclose it in response to a suitable inquiry conducted under the provisions of § 26.63, a background investigation conducted under the provisions of this chapter, or any other inquiry or investigation. The individual may not be required to disclose the administrative action in response to requests for self-disclosure of potentially disqualifying FFD information, except if the individual's authorization was subsequently denied or terminated unfavorably by the licensee or other entity.
( c ) Before granting authorization to an individual whose authorization has been interrupted for a period of no more than 30 days and whose last period of authorization was terminated favorably, the licensee or other entity shall ensure that— ( 1 ) A self-disclosure has been obtained and reviewed under the applicable requirements of § 26.61;
( 2 ) The individual has been subject to pre-access drug and alcohol testing under the applicable requirements of § 26.65, if the individual's authorization was interrupted for more than 5 days; and
( 3 ) The individual is subject to random drug and alcohol testing under the applicable requirements of § 26.67.
( d ) If potentially disqualifying FFD information is disclosed or discovered, the licensee or other entity may not grant authorization to the individual, except under § 26.69.
#### CLARK, Respondent, v. WILLIAMS, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

July 31, 1914.)

Action by Michael Clark against James I. Williams.

No opinion. Judgment and order of the County Court of Dutchess County affirmed, with costs.
PGI 225.371 Contractor personnel supporting U.S. Armed Forces deployed outside the United States.       (1) DoDI 3020.41, Operational Contract Support (OCS), establishes policy, assigns responsibilities and provides procedures for OCS, including OCS Program Management, contract support integration, and integration of defense contractor personnel into contingency operations outside the United States. This instruction serves as a comprehensive source of DoD policy and procedures concerning DoD contractor and subcontractor personnel supporting the U.S. Armed Forces deployed outside the United States.          (2) Also see PGI                 207.105             (b)(20)(C)(9) for special considerations for acquisition planning for crisis situations outside the United States.    **PGI 225.371-2 Definitions.****PGI 225.371-3 Government support.****PGI 225.371-5 Contract clauses.****Parent topic:** PGI 225.3 -CONTRACTSPERFORMED OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES
SUBPART 25.1 – BUY AMERICAN ACT – SUPPLIES    *(Revised September 19, 2016 through PROCLTR 16-09)* **Parent topic:** PART 25 – FOREIGN ACQUISITION25.103 Exceptions.    (b)(1)(iii)(C) Submit supporting documentation to the DLA Acquisition Operations Division.       (b)(2)(ii) Submit the determination and supporting documentation to the DLA Acquisition Operations Division.