alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 2
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

§ 2.1009 Procedures. ( a ) Each potential party, interested governmental participant, or party shall— ( 1 ) Designate an official who will be responsible for administration of its responsibility to provide electronic files of documentary material ;
( 2 ) Establish procedures to implement the requirements in § 2.1003;
( 3 ) Provide training to its staff on the procedures for implementation of the responsibility to provide electronic files of documentary material;
( 4 ) Ensure that all documents carry the submitter's unique identification number;
( 5 ) Cooperate with the advisory review process established by the NRC under § 2.1011(d).
( b ) The responsible official designated under paragraph (a)(1) of this section shall certify to the Pre-License Application Presiding Officer that the procedures specified in paragraph (a)(2) of this section have been implemented, and that to the best of his or her knowledge, the documentary material specified in § 2.1003 has been identified and made electronically available. The initial certification must be made at the time the participant is required to comply with § 2.1003. The responsible official for the DOE shall also update this certification at the time DOE submits the license application.
[63 FR 71738, Dec. 30, 1998, as amended at 66 FR 29466, May 31, 2001]
```

[Federal Register: September 14, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 177)]
[Notices]               
[Page 55846]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr14se10-122]                         

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 7113]

 
U.S. Department of State Advisory Committee on Private 
International Law: Public Meeting on the Work of the UNCITRAL Working 
Group on Procurement

    The United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) 
Working Group on Procurement will next meet November 1-5, 2010 in 
Vienna. At that meeting, the Working Group will continue its work on 
revisions to the 1994 Model Law on Procurement of Goods, Construction 
and Services, and it may also begin a review of a Guide to Enactment 
that will accompany the revised Model Law.
    In preparation for that meeting, a public meeting will be held, 
under the auspices of the Department of State's Advisory Committee on 
Private International Law, to obtain the views of concerned 
stakeholders.
    Time and Place: The public meeting will take place at The George 
Washington University Law School, Faculty Conference Center, 5th floor, 
2000 H Street, NW., Washington, DC on October 21, 2010. The meeting 
will begin at 9:30 a.m. and is expected to last no later than noon. If 
you are unable to attend the public meeting and would like to 
participate from a remote location, teleconferencing will be available.
    Public Participation: It is requested that persons wishing to 
attend contact Trisha Smeltzer prior to October 14, 2010, at 
smeltzertk@state.gov or 703-812-2382 and provide their name, e-mail 
address, and affiliation. A member of the public requesting reasonable 
accommodation should make his or her request upon registering for the 
meeting. Such requests received after October 19 will be considered, 
but might not be possible to fulfill. Please contact Ms. Smeltzer for 
additional meeting information, including teleconferencing dial-in 
details.

    Dated: September 7, 2010.
Keith Loken,
Assistant Legal Adviser, Office of Private International Law, Office of 
the Legal Adviser, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2010-22890 Filed 9-13-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-08-P
```
PGI 215.371-2 Promote competition.       (a) For competitive solicitations in which more than one potential offeror expressed an interest in an acquisition, but only one offer was ultimately received, the Contracting Officer shall—          (1) Seek feedback (e.g., issue an RFI) after award from potential offerors expected to submit an offer; and          (2) Document any feedback received in the contract file.          (b) Agencies shall use any feedback received when considering how to overcome barriers to competition for future requirements.    **Parent topic:** PGI 215.371 Only one offer.
222 So.2d 63

#### John R. HUGHES v. Frank STANDIDGE and Fred Jourdan.

No. 49756.

May 9, 1969.

In re: Frank Standidge applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to. the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans. 219 So.2d 6.

Writ denied. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal we find no error of law in the judgment complained of.

HAMLIN, J., is of the view that the application should be granted.
PGI 217.7503 Spares acquisition integrated

with production.

(1) Spares acquisition integrated with production (SAIP) is a technique used to acquire

replenishment parts concurrently with parts being produced for the end item.

(2) Include appropriately tailored provisions in the contract when SAIP is used.

Parent topic: PGI 217.75 -ACQUISITION OF REPLENISHMENT PARTS
# PGI Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation

- PGI Part 252 - CLAUSES 
- PGI Part 253 - FORMS 

**Parent topic:**PGI Subchapter H - CONTRACT MANAGEMENT
§ 52.179 Criteria for renewal. The Commission may grant the renewal if the Commission determines: ( a ) The manufacturing license complies with the Atomic Energy Act and the Commission's regulations and orders applicable and in effect at the time the manufacturing license was originally issued; and
( b ) Any new requirements the Commission may wish to impose are: ( 1 ) Necessary for adequate protection to public health and safety or common defense and security;
( 2 ) Necessary for compliance with the Commission's regulations and orders applicable and in effect at the time the manufacturing license was originally issued; or
( 3 ) A substantial increase in overall protection of the public health and safety or the common defense and security to be derived from the new requirements, and the direct and indirect costs of implementation of those requirements are justified in view of this increased protection.
ex10-4.htm

 

    
      

    
Exhibit 10.4

    AMENDMENT
NO. 1

    TO

    CHANGE IN
CONTROL AGREEMENT

    


    This AMENDMENT NO. 1 (“Amendment”) to
Change in Control Agreement (the “Agreement”) is made as of the 1st day
of January 2010 between KAMAN CORPORATION, a Connecticut corporation (the
“Company”) and WILLIAM C. DENNINGER (“Executive”).

    


    W I T N E
S S E T H:

    


    WHEREAS,
the Company and the Executive have entered into the Agreement, dated as of
November 17, 2008; and

    


    WHEREAS,
the Company and the Executive desire to amend the Agreement;

    


    NOW
THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, of the mutual promises contained
herein and of the other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and
sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as
follows:

    


    1.   A new sentence is
added to Section 15 of the Agreement as the first sentence thereof, as
follows:  “Except as specifically provided in this Agreement, this
Agreement shall not affect the respective rights and obligations of the Company
and the Executive under the Executive Employment Agreement.”

    


    2.      Capitalized
Terms.  Capitalized terms not otherwise defined in this Amendment
shall have the meaning ascribed to them in the Agreement.

    


    3.      Full Force and
Effect.  As modified by this Amendment, the Agreement shall
remain in full force and effect.

    


    IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment.

    

      	
            	 
       KAMAN
      CORPORATION
	 	 
	 
      	
              By:  

            	
              /s/ Candace
      A. Clark

            
	 
      	
              Its:

            	
              Senior
      Vice President, Chief Legal Officer

            
	 
      	 
      	
              and
      Secretary

            
	 
      	 
      	 
      
	 
      	
              Date:

            	
              February
      23, 2010

            




      
        	 
      	 
      	
                 WILLIAM
      C. DENNINGER

                 

              
	 
      	 
      	
                /s/ William
      C. Denninger

              
	 
      	 
      	 
      
	 
      	 
      	
                Date:  February
      23, 2010
PUBLIC LAW 109–400—DEC. 18, 2006 120 STAT. 2725

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 5108:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 152 (2006):

Sept. 28, considered and passed House.

Dec. 6, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 109–400

109th Congress

An Act

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 1213 East

Houston Street in Cleveland, Texas, as the ‘‘Lance Corporal Robert A. Martinez

Post Office Building’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LANCE CORPORAL ROBERT A. MARTINEZ POST OFFICE

BUILDING.

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal

Service located at 1213 East Houston Street in Cleveland, Texas,

shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Lance Corporal Robert

A. Martinez Post Office Building’’.

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation,

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference

to the ‘‘Lance Corporal Robert A. Martinez Post Office Building’’.

Approved December 18, 2006.

Dec. 18, 2006

[H.R. 5108]
PGI 213.306 SF 44, Purchase Order-Invoice-Voucher.       (a) (1) (A) Establish fuel card accounts—          (*1*) For DoD customers, contact the Service or Agency Component Program Manager (CPM) for fuel cards (see http://www.desc.dla.mil/DCM/Files/CPMPOCs06022010.pdf; and          (*2*) For non-DoD customers, contact the designated Account Manager identified at http://www.desc.dla.mil/DCM/DCMPage.asp?pageid=41.          (B) Purchases using the AIR Card® and SEA Card® shall follow the guidance found at http://www.desc.dla.mil/DCM/DCMPage.asp?pageid=28.    **Parent topic:** PGI 213.3 -SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION METHODS
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Edward Hull, Also Known as James Brown, Appellant.

[813 NYS2d 300]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Lewis Bart Stone, J.), rendered October 22, 2004, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 6 to 12 years, unanimously affirmed.

We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence. Our in camera review of the grand jury minutes establishes that there is no merit to defendant’s other argument. Concur—Tom, J.P, Mazzarelli, Friedman, Marlow and Malone, JJ.
#### Augustus B. Hart, Appellant, *v.*Benton-Bellefontaine Railway Company, Respondent.

July 1, 1879.

The road-bed, rails, and right of way of a railroad are not personalty; and when sold by the sheriff, the requisites for an execution sale of realty must be observed.

Appeal from St. Louis Circuit Court.

*Affirmed.*

Marshall *&*Barclay, for appellant.

J. M. & C. H. Krum, for respondent.

Lewis, P. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

Under an execution in plaintiff’s favor against theBellefontaine Railway Company, the sheriff levied on “ the roadbed, rails, and right of way” of the defendant in execution. Plaintiff, claiming . to have become the purchaser at a sale made in pui'suance of the levy, instituted this suit for damages, as for' a conversion by defendant of his personal property.

The road-bed, rails, and right of way belonging to a railroad company are in no sense personal property. *Farmers' Loan and Trust Co.*v. *Hendrickson,*25 Barb. 493. It is immaterial that the right enjoyed by a street-railway corpora*447tion is a mere easement in the use of the streets. Easements are classified among incorporeal hereditaments which lie in grant. The record in this case fails to show a valid sheriff’s sale, whether the property sold were personal or real. It nowhere appears that there was a public sale by auction, nor is it shown by what number of handbills, if any, the sale was advertised. It is not pretended that the requisites for an execution sale of real estate were observed. The Circuit Court did rightly in excluding the sheriff’s bill of sale, and in sustaining the demurrer to the evidence. All the judges concurring, the judgment is affirmed.
2007-2352.

#### State v. Baiduc.

Geauga App. No. 2006-G-2711, 2007-Ohio-4963. On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied.

Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, and Cupp, JJ., dissent.
# SUBPART 11.1 – SELECTING AND DEVELOPING REQUIREMENTS DOCUMENTS

*(Revised September 9, 2016 through PROCLTR 2016-09)*

**Parent topic:**PART 11 – DESCRIBING AGENCY NEEDS

## 11.103 Market acceptance.

(a) The contracting officer may require the demonstration in coordination with the product specialist, Office of Counsel, and procuring organization COMPAD.
{B0731162}

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

NORTHERN DIVISION 

FARMERS 

TELECOMMUNICATIONS 

COOPERATIVE, INC., 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

VERIZON BUSINESS NETWORK 

SERVICES INC. and QWEST 

COMMUNICATIONS 

CORPORATION, 

 Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:06cv-00790-WC 

MOTION TO WITHDRAW OF ROBERT A. KLINCK

 Comes Now Robert A. Klinck, counsel for Defendant Verizon Business Network 

Services Inc. (“Verizon”), and moves the Court for an Order allowing Mr. Klinck’s 

withdrawal of counsel of record in this matter due to his resignation from the law firm of 

Kellogg, Huber, Hansen, Todd, Evans & Figel, P.L.L.C. Verizon has no objection to Mr. 

Klinck’s withdrawal and will continue to be represented by counsel of record from the 

law firms of Starnes & Atchison LLP and Kellogg, Huber, Hansen, Todd, Evans & Figel, 

P.L.L.C. 

Case 2:06-cv-00790-WC Document 50 Filed 07/03/2007 Page 1 of 3
2 

July 3, 2007 

Respectfully submitted, 

/s/ Bryan O. Balogh 

Bryan O. Balogh 

Robin H. Jones 

STARNES & ATCHISON LLP 

100 Brookwood Place 

Seventh Floor 

Post Office Box 598512 

Birmingham, Alabama 35259-8512 

205.868.6000 

205.868.6099 (fax) 

/s/ Robert A. Klinck 

Scott H. Angstreich 

Robert A. Klinck 

KELLOGG, HUBER, HANSEN, TODD, 

 EVANS & FIGEL, P.L.L.C. 

1615 M Street, N.W., Suite 400 

Washington, D.C. 20036 

202.326.7900 

202.326.7999 (fax) 

Attorneys for Defendant 

Verizon Business Network Services Inc.

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

 I hereby certify that on July 3, 2007, I electronically filed the foregoing using the 

CM/ECF system, which will provide electronic service copies to the following: 

Dana H. Billingsley dana@wilkersonbryan.com 

 cathy@wilkersonbryan.com 

Leigh Anne Hodge lhodge@balch.com; jglover@balch.com 

Jonathan Michael Hooks jonathan@wilkersonbryan.com 

Robin Garrett Laurie rlaurie@balch.com; dearly@balch.com 

Joseph Seawell Moore jsmoore@balch.com; dharris@balch.com 

Case 2:06-cv-00790-WC Document 50 Filed 07/03/2007 Page 2 of 3
3 

Mark Douglas Wilkerson mark@wilkersonbryan.com 

 cathy@wilkersonbryan.com 

Notice will be delivered by other means to: 

Jana Eisinger 

Qwest Services Corporation 

1801 California Street 

Suite 900 

Denver, CO 80202 

Patrick H. Tate 

P.O. Box 680593 

Fort Payne, AL 35968 

 

 

 /s/ Bryan O. Balogh

 OF COUNSEL 

Case 2:06-cv-00790-WC Document 50 Filed 07/03/2007 Page 3 of 3
Case 1:06-cv-00775-TFM Document 15 Filed 10/10/2006 Page 1 of 1
223 So.2d 869

#### William SEWELL v. NEW ORLEANS POLICE DEPARTMENT.

No. 49905.

June 27, 1969.

In re: William Sewell applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Orleans. 221 So.2d 621.

Application denied. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal there is no error of law in the judgment.
Editorial Note on Part 40
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 40 appear at 79 FR 75740, Dec. 19, 2014.

§ 40.26 General license for possession and storage of byproduct material as defined in this part. ( a ) A general license is hereby issued to receive title to, own, or possess byproduct material as defined in this part without regard to form or quantity.
( b ) The general license in paragraph (a) of this section applies only: In the case of licensees of the Commission, where activities that result in the production of byproduct material are authorized under a specific license issued by the Commission pursuant to this part, to byproduct material possessed or stored at an authorized disposal containment area or transported incident to such authorized activity: *Provided,* That authority to receive title to, own, or possess byproduct material under this general license shall terminate when the specific license for source material expires, is renewed, or is amended to include a specific license for byproduct material as defined in this part.
( c ) The general license in paragraph (a) of this section is subject to: ( 1 ) The provisions of parts 19, 20, 21, and §§ 40.1, 40.2a, 40.3, 40.4, 40.5, 40.6, 40.41, 40.46, 40.60, 40.61, 40.62, 40.63, 40.65, 40.71, and 40.81 of part 40 of this chapter; and
( 2 ) The documentation of daily inspections of tailings or waste retention systems and the immediate notification of the appropriate NRC regional office as indicated in appendix D to part 20 of this chapter, or the Director, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555, of any failure in a tailings or waste retention system that results in a release of tailings or waste into unrestricted areas, or of any unusual conditions (conditions not contemplated in the design of the retention system) that if not corrected could lead to failure of the system and result in a release of tailings or waste into unrestricted areas; and any additional requirements the Commission may by order deem necessary. The licensee shall retain this documentation of each daily inspection as a record for three years after each inspection is documented.
( d ) The general license in paragraph (a) of this section shall expire nine months from the effective date of this subparagraph unless an applicable licensee has submitted, pursuant to the provisions of § 40.31 of this part, an application for license renewal or amendment which includes a detailed program for meeting the technical and financial criteria contained in appendix A of this part.
[44 FR 50014, Aug. 24, 1979, as amended at 45 FR 12377, Feb. 26, 1980; 45 FR 65531, Oct. 3, 1980; 53 FR 19248, May 27, 1988; 56 FR 40768, Aug. 16, 1991; 73 FR 5720, Jan. 31, 2008]
Editorial Note on Part 37
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 37 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

§ 37.51 Maintenance and testing. ( a ) Each licensee subject to this subpart shall implement a maintenance and testing program to ensure that intrusion alarms, associated communication systems, and other physical components of the systems used to secure or detect unauthorized access to radioactive material are maintained in operable condition and are capable of performing their intended function when needed. The equipment relied on to meet the security requirements of this part must be inspected and tested for operability and performance at the manufacturer's suggested frequency. If there is no suggested manufacturer's suggested frequency, the testing must be performed at least annually, not to exceed 12 months.
( b ) The licensee shall maintain records on the maintenance and testing activities for 3 years.
exhibit10_1.htm


    Exhibit
10.1

    


    Summary of 2010 Named
Executive Officer Cash Compensation

    


    The
Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors has approved 2010 base salaries
for our named executive officers as set forth below.

    


    The
Compensation Committee has also approved a process for the determination of 2010
cash bonuses for our named executive officers, pursuant to which bonuses, if
any, will be determined in the discretion of the Compensation Committee based on
the achievement of certain corporate goals and individual performance in
2010.  The corporate goals include objectives relating to the
development of existing drug candidates, the identification of additional drug
candidates and the achievement of certain financial and business
goals.  Achievement of these corporate goals will be evaluated by the
Compensation Committee in making determinations regarding bonuses for 2010
performance.  However, the Compensation Committee retains broad
discretion over the amount and payment of cash bonuses and is not bound by any
pre-determined agreement, formula or other standard with respect to such
decisions.

    


    The
Compensation Committee has established a bonus target, expressed as a percentage
of base salary, for each of our named executive officers, assuming full
achievement of corporate goals and a high level of individual
performance.  The bonus target percentage for each of our named
executive officers is set forth below.

    


    
      	
              Name and Position

            	 	
              2010

              Base Salary

            	 	 	
              2010

              Bonus Target

            	 
	
              Arthur
      T. Sands, M.D., Ph.D.

              President
      and Chief Executive Officer

            	 	$	580,000	 	 	 	50	%
	
              Alan
      J. Main, Ph.D.

              Executive
      Vice President of Pharmaceutical Research

            	 	$	350,000	 	 	 	35	%
	
              Jeffrey
      L. Wade, J.D.

              Executive
      Vice President and General Counsel

            	 	$	365,000	 	 	 	35	%
	
              Brian
      P. Zambrowicz, Ph.D.

              Executive
      Vice President and Chief Scientific Officer

            	 	$	400,000	 	 	 	40	%
	
              James
      F. Tessmer

              Vice
      President, Finance and Accounting

            	 	$	235,000	 	 	 	25	%
###### Editorial Note on Part 4

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 4 appear at 77 FR 39904, July 6, 2012.

#### § 4.41 Periodic compliance reviews.

The responsible NRC official shall from time to time review the practices of recipients to determine whether they are complying with this subpart.
Editorial Note on Part 35
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 35 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

§ 35.2642 Records of periodic spot-checks for teletherapy units. ( a ) A licensee shall retain a record of each periodic spot-check for teletherapy units required by § 35.642 for 3 years.
( b ) The record must include— ( 1 ) The date of the spot-check;
( 2 ) The manufacturer's name, model number, and serial number of the teletherapy unit, source and instrument used to measure the output of the teletherapy unit;
( 3 ) An assessment of timer linearity and constancy;
( 4 ) The calculated on-off error;
( 5 ) A determination of the coincidence of the radiation field and the field indicated by the light beam localizing device;
( 6 ) The determined accuracy of each distance measuring and localization device;
( 7 ) The difference between the anticipated output and the measured output;
( 8 ) Notations indicating the operability of each entrance door electrical interlock, each electrical or mechanical stop, each source exposure indicator light, and the viewing and intercom system and doors; and
( 9 ) The name of the individual who performed the periodic spot-check and the signature of the authorized medical physicist who reviewed the record of the spot-check.
( c ) A licensee shall retain a copy of the procedures required by § 35.642(b) until the licensee no longer possesses the teletherapy unit.
PGI 243.204-71 Certification of requests for

equitable adjustment.

(b) For example, a request for equitable adjustment that involves both an increase of $100,000 and a

decrease of $105,000 has an absolute value of $205,000 ($100,000 + $105,000, regardless of

whether the amounts are plus or minus), which exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold.

Parent topic: PGI 243.204 Administration.