alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
PGI 217.770 Procedures.       (a)(3)          (i) Departments and agencies shall ensure full awareness of the total costs of all fees associated with use of a non-DoD contracting vehicle. In order to ensure full awareness, the DoD acquisition official shall require the servicing agency to─          (A) Provide notification if its acquisition approach will use another agency’s contract vehicle; and          (B) Identify all fees (direct and indirect) associated with the assisted acquisition.          (ii) The DoD acquisition official shall document in the business decision the rationale to continue with the assisted acquisition given the total fees (direct and indirect) involved.    **Parent topic:** PGI 217.7 - Interagency Acquisitions: Acquisitions by Nondefense Agencies on Behalf of the Department of Defense
Editorial Note on Part 51
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 51 appear at 80 FR 74980, Dec. 1, 2015.

§ 51.23 Environmental impacts of continued storage of spent nuclear fuel beyond the licensed life for operation of a reactor. ( a ) The Commission has generically determined that the environmental impacts of continued storage of spent nuclear fuel beyond the licensed life for operation of a reactor are those impacts identified in NUREG-2157, “Generic Environmental Impact Statement for Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel.”
( b ) The environmental reports described in §§ 51.50, 51.53, and 51.61 are not required to discuss the environmental impacts of spent nuclear fuel storage in a reactor facility storage pool or an ISFSI for the period following the term of the reactor operating license, reactor combined license, or ISFSI license. The impact determinations in NUREG-2157 regarding continued storage shall be deemed incorporated into the environmental impact statements described in §§ 51.75, 51.80(b), 51.95, and 51.97(a). The impact determinations in NUREG-2157 regarding continued storage shall be considered in the environmental assessments described in §§ 51.30(b) and 51.95(d), if the impacts of continued storage of spent fuel are relevant to the proposed action.
( c ) This section does not alter any requirements to consider the environmental impacts of spent fuel storage during the term of a reactor operating license or combined license, or a license for an ISFSI in a licensing proceeding.
[49 FR 34694, Aug. 31, 1984, as amended at 55 FR 38474, Sept. 18, 1990; 72 FR 49509, Aug. 28, 2007; 75 FR 81037, Dec. 23, 2010; 79 FR 56260, Sept. 19, 2014]
§ 39.8 Information collection requirements: OMB approval. ( a ) The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has submitted the information collection requirements contained in this part to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for approval as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S. 3501 *et seq.*) The NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. OMB has approved the information collection requirements contained in this part under control number 3150-0130.
( b ) The approved information collection requirements contained in this part appear in §§ 39.11, 39.13, 39.15, 39.17, 39.31, 39.33, 39.35, 39.37, 39.39, 39.43, 39.51, 39.61, 39.63, 39.65, 39.67, 39.73, 39.75, 39.77, and 39.91.
( c ) This part contains information collection requirements in addition to those approved under the control number specified in paragraph (a) of this section. These information collection requirements and the control numbers under which they are approved are as follows: ( 1 ) In § 39.11, NRC Form 313 is approved under control 3150-0120.
( 2 ) [Reserved]
[62 FR 52187, Oct. 6, 1997, as amended at 67 FR 67099, Nov. 4, 2002]
#### LO RE, Respondent, v. FEDERMAN, Appellant, et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

February 19, 1915.)

Action by Vincent Lo Re against Philip Federaran and Carl Rieger.

No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs.
SUBCHAPTER B—COMPETITION AND

ACQUISITION PLANNING

PART 1805—PUBLICIZING CONTRACT ACTIONS

PART 1806—COMPETITION REQUIREMENTS

PART 1807—ACQUISITION PLANNING

PART 1808—REQUIRED SOURCES OF SUPPLIES AND SERVICES

PART 1809—CONTRACTOR QUALIFICATIONS

PART 1811—DESCRIBING AGENCY NEEDS

PART 1812—ACQUISITION OF COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS AND COMMERCIAL

SERVICES

PART 1805—PUBLICIZING CONTRACT ACTIONS

Subpart 1805.3—Synopses of Contract Awards

1805.303 Announcement of contract awards.

PART 1806—COMPETITION REQUIREMENTS

Subpart 1806.2—Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources

1806.202 Establishing or maintaining alternative sources. (NASA supplements

paragraphs (a) and (b)).

PART 1807—ACQUISITION PLANNING

Subpart 1807.72—Acquisition Forecasting

1807.7200 Policy.

1807.7201 Definitions.

PART 1808—REQUIRED SOURCES OF SUPPLIES AND SERVICES

Subpart 1808.8—Acquisition of Printing and Related Supplies

1808.870 Contract clause.

PART 1809—CONTRACTOR QUALIFICATIONS

Subpart 1809.1—Responsible Prospective Contractors

1809.104-4 Subcontractor responsibility.

1809.105-2 Determinations and documentation.

Subpart 1809.2—Qualification requirements

1809.206 Acquisitions subject to qualification requirements.

1809.206-1 General. (NASA supplements paragraph (b) and (c))

Subpart 1809.4—Debarment, Suspension, and Ineligibility

1809.403 Definitions.

Subpart 1809.5—Organizational and Consultant Conflicts of Interest

1809.505-4 Obtaining access to sensitive information.

1809.507 Solicitation provisions and contract clause.

1809.507-2 Contract clause.

PART 1811—DESCRIBING AGENCY NEEDS

Subpart 1811.4—Delivery or Performance Schedules

1811.404-70 NASA contract clauses.

PART 1812—ACQUISITION OF COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS AND COMMERCIAL SERVICES

Subpart 1812.3—Solicitation Provisions and Contract Clauses for the Acquisition of

Commercial Products and Commercial Services

1812.301 Solicitation provisions and contract clauses for the acquisition of

Commercial Products and Commercial Services.

Subpart 1812.70—Commercial Space Hardware or Services
1812.7000 Anchor tenancy contracts.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 487 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 487

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                     December 13, 2005.
Whereas the influence of Korean Americans may be observed in all facets of 
        American life, including entrepreneurship, the arts, and education;
Whereas on January 13, 1903, 102 pioneer Korean immigrants arrived in the United 
        States initiating the first chapter of Korean immigration to America;
Whereas the centennial year of 2003 marked an important milestone in the history 
        of Korean immigration;
Whereas Korean Americans, like other groups of immigrants that came to the 
        United States before them, have settled and thrived in the United States 
        through strong family ties, community support, and hard work;
Whereas Korean Americans have made significant contributions to the economic 
        vitality of the United States and the global marketplace;
Whereas Korean Americans have invigorated businesses, churches, and academic 
        communities in the United States;
Whereas Korean Americans have made enormous contributions to the military 
        strength of the United States;
Whereas today, at least 4,000 Korean Americans serve in the Armed Forces of the 
        United States, with approximately 25 percent of them currently serving 
        in Iraq; and
Whereas the Centennial Committees of Korean Immigration and Korean Americans 
        have designated January 13 of each year as ``Korean American Day'' to 
        commemorate the first step of the long and prosperous journey of Korean 
        Americans in the United States: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) supports the goals and ideals of a Korean American Day;
            (2) urges all Americans to observe Korean American Day so as to have 
        a greater appreciation of the invaluable contributions Korean Americans 
        have made to United States; and
            (3) honors and recognizes the 103rd anniversary of the arrival of 
        the first Korean immigrants to the United States.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
H. Res. 331

In the House of Representatives, U.S., 

June 21, 2005.

Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it 

shall be in order without intervention of any point of order 

to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 2475) to authorize 

appropriations for fiscal year 2006 for intelligence and intelligence-related activities of the United States Government, 

the Community Management Account, and the Central Intelligence Agency Retirement and Disability System, and for 

other purposes. The bill shall be considered as read. The 

amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the 

Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence now printed in 

the bill, modified by the amendment printed in part A of the 

report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution, shall be considered as adopted. The previous question 

shall be considered as ordered on the bill, as amended, and 

on any further amendment thereto to final passage without 

intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate on the bill, 

as amended, equally divided and controlled by the chairman 

and ranking minority member of the Permanent Select Com-
2

•HRES 331 EH 

mittee on Intelligence; (2) the further amendment printed in 

part B of the report of the Committee on Rules, if offered 

by Representative Maloney of New York or her designee, 

which shall be in order without intervention of any point of 

order or demand for division of the question, shall be considered as read, and shall be separately debatable for 30 minutes equally divided and controlled by the proponent and an 

opponent; and (3) one motion to recommit with or without 

instructions. 

Attest:

Clerk.
Exhibit 10.4.13






Exhibit 10.4.13



Description of 2010 Palo Verde Specific Compensation Opportunity for Randall K. Edington




Consistent with the offer letter between the Company and Mr. Edington, dated December 20, 2006, the Company adopted the
2010 Palo Verde Specific Compensation Opportunity. Mr. Edington has the opportunity to receive up to $125,000 upon the
achievement of specified Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station
operational and performance metrics.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

B. B., a minor, 1by and )

Through his mother and next friend, )

OWENA KNOWLES, )

)

Plaintiff, ) CASE NO.:

) 3:06-CV-00715-MHT

v. )

)

PAWN CITY, INC.; INTERSTATE )

ARMS CORPORATION; NORINCO )

a/k/a CHINA NORTH INDUSTRIES )

COPORATION, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF MOTION

TO AMEND ANSWER TO ASSERT CROSSCLAIM

COMES NOW the defendant, Interstate Arms Corporation, and hereby gives notice 

of its withdrawal of its Motion to Amend its Answer to assert a Crossclaim against 

Norinco. 

Respectfully submitted,

/s/Todd M. Higey

Todd M. Higey

Ala. Bar No. HIG019

Attorney for Interstate Arms Corporation

ADAMS AND REESE LLP

2100 3rd Avenue North, Suite 1100

Birmingham, Alabama 35203-3367

Telephone: (205) 250-5000

Fax: (205) 250-5034

E-mail: todd.higey@arlaw.com

1 The plaintiff is not a minor: His date of birth was January 4, 1987.

Case 3:06-cv-00715-MHT-TFM Document 14 Filed 12/13/2006 Page 1 of 2
2

Curt M. Johnson, Esq.

JOHNSON, CALDWELL & MCCOY

117 N. Lanier Avenue, Ste. 201

Lanett, Alabama 36863-2013

Telephone: (334) 644-5101

Fax: (334) 644-5121

E-mail: cjohnson@jcmlaw.net 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on December 13, 2006, I electronically filed the foregoing 

with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of 

such filing to the persons listed below:

James C. Barton, Jr., Esq.

Alan D. Mathis, Esq.

JOHNSTON, BARTON, PROCTOR & POWELL, LLP

2900 AmSouth/Harbert Plaza

1901 Sixth Avenue North

Birmingham, Alabama 35203

David J. Hodge, Esq.

PITTMAN, HOOKS, DUTTON, KIRBY & HELLUMS, P.C.

2001 Park Place North

1100 Park Place Tower

Birmingham, Alabama 35203

Nick Wooten, Esq.

WOOTEN LAW FIRM, P.C.

P.O. Drawer 290

Lafayette, Alabama 36862

John D. Gleissner, Esq.

ROGERS & ASSOCIATES

3000 Riverchase Galleria

Suite 650

Birmingham, Alabama 35244

/s/Todd M. Higey

Of Counsel

Case 3:06-cv-00715-MHT-TFM Document 14 Filed 12/13/2006 Page 2 of 2
§ 434.99 Explanation of numbering system for codes. ( a ) For purposes of this part, a derivative of two different numbering systems will be used. ( 1 ) For the purpose of designating a section, the system employed in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) will be employed. The number “434” which signifies part 434 in chapter II of Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, is used as a prefix for all section headings. The suffix is a two or three digit section number. For example the lighting section of the standards is designated § 434.401.
( 2 ) Within each section, a numbering system common to many national voluntary consensus standards is used. A decimal system is used to denote paragraphs and subparagraphs within a section. For example, in § 434.401, “401.2.1” refers to subsection 401, paragraph 2, subparagraph 1.
( b ) The hybrid numbering system is used for two purposes: ( 1 ) The use of the Code of Federal Regulations' numbering system allows the researcher using the CFR easy access to the standards.
( 2 ) The use of the second system allows the builder, designer, architect or engineer easy access because they are familiar to this system numbering. This system was chosen because of its commonality among the building industry.
PGI 209.571-7 Systems engineering and technical assistance contracts.       Because of the special organizational conflict of interest restrictions that relate to systems engineering and technical assistance contracts, it is more practical to separate systems engineering and technical assistance-type work from design- and development-type work, and not include both types of work in the same task order or other contract vehicle.    **Parent topic:** PGI 209.571 Organizational conflicts of interest in major defense acquisition programs.
PGI 206.304 Approval of the justification.

(a)(S-70) For a non-competitive follow-on to a previous award for the same supply or service

supported by a justification for other than full and open competition citing the authority at FAR

6.302-1—

(i) The justification shall include a copy of the previous justification to assist the approval authority

in determining whether the planned actions to remove any barriers to competition cited on the

previous justification were completed; and

(ii) The approval authority shall determine whether the planned actions were completed. If the

actions were not completed, the justification for the follow-on acquisition shall be approved by the

approval authority one-level above the approval authority for the previous justification (see FAR

6.304). If the previous justification was approved by the Senior Procurement Executive (SPE), the

approval remains at the SPE level.

Parent topic: PGI 206.3 -OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
59–008 

109TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 2d Session 109–720 

WAIVING A REQUIREMENT OF CLAUSE 6(a) OF RULE XIII WITH RESPECT 

TO CONSIDERATION OF CERTAIN RESOLUTIONS REPORTED FROM THE 

COMMITTEE ON RULES AND PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF MOTIONS TO SUSPEND THE RULES 

DECEMBER 6, 2006.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

Mrs. CAPITO, from the Committee on Rules, 

submitted the following 

R E P O R T 

[To accompany H. Res. 1096] 

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House 

Resolution 1096, by a non-record vote, reports the same to the 

House with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted. 

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution waives clause 6(a) of rule XIII (requiring a twothirds vote to consider a rule on the same day it is reported from 

the Rules Committee) against certain resolutions reported from the 

Rules Committee. The resolution applies the waiver to any special 

rule reported on the legislative day of December 7, 2006. 

The rule further provides that suspensions will be in order at 

any time on the legislative day of December 7, 2006. The rule provides that the Speaker or his designee shall consult with the Minority Leader or her designee on any suspension considered under 

the rule. 

Finally, the rule provides that House Resolution 810, 939, 951, 

and 1047 are laid upon the table. 

Æ 


hmoore on PROD1PC68 with HMRPT
§ 473.25 Reviewability of certification. Any certification issued under these rules is— ( a ) Subject to disclosure under 5 U.S.C. 552 (1970) and section 17 of the Federal Nonnuclear Energy Research and Development Act of 1974, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 5918 (1970);
( b ) Subject neither to judicial review nor to the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 551-559 (1970), except as provided under paragraph (a) of this section; and
( c ) Available to the Committee on Science and Technology of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources of the Senate.
###### Editorial Note on Part 420

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 420 appear at 64 FR 46114, Aug. 24, 1999.

#### § 420.36 Evaluation criteria.

The evaluation criteria, including program activity-specific criteria, will be set forth in the program guidance/solicitation document.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION

CALVIN FLUKER, et al., )

)

Plaintiffs, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

v. ) 2:06cv785-MHT

) 

U.S. FOODSERVICE, INC., )

and U.S. FOODSERVICE, )

INC.- Montgomery Division, )

)

Defendant. )

ORDER

It is ORDERED that the motion to sever (doc. no. 9)

is denied. If, after discovery, it should appear that

severance is nonetheless warranted, the court will

reconsider the issue.

DONE, this the 18th day of October, 2006.

 /s/ Myron H. Thompson 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00785-MHT-WC Document 14 Filed 10/18/2006 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:06-cv-00786-MHT-CSC Document 5 Filed 09/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
Case 2:06-cv-00783-ID-SRW     Document 11      Filed 10/03/2006     Page 1 of 2

Case 2:06-cv-00783-ID-SRW     Document 11      Filed 10/03/2006     Page 2 of 2
#### In re NOONAN.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

February 19, 1915.)

In the matter of Louis T. Noonan.

No opinion. Referred to Hon. H. A. Gildersleeve, official referee. Settle order on notice.
#### § 431.384 [Reserved]
227 So.2d 147

#### Mrs. Beatrice Bourgeois ERDAL v. Gary B. ERDAL.

No. 50063.

Oct. 23, 1969.

In re: Gary B. Erdal applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Jefferson. 224 So.2d 544.

The application is denied. There appears no error of law in the judgment complained of.
IV 

House Calendar No. 79 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 399 

[Report No. 109–212] 

Providing for the consideration of the conference report to accompany the 

bill (H.R. 3) to authorize funds for Federal-aid highways, highway safety 

programs, and transit programs, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 29 (legislative day, JULY 28), 2005 

Mrs. CAPITO, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; 

which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for the consideration of the conference report to 

accompany the bill (H.R. 3) to authorize funds for Federal-aid highways, highway safety programs, and transit 

programs, and for other purposes. 

1 Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution 

2 it shall be in order to consider the conference report to 

3 accompany the bill (H.R. 3) to authorize funds for Fed4 eral-aid highways, highway safety programs, and transit 

5 programs, and for other purposes. All points of order 

6 against the conference report and against its consideration 
2 

HRES 399 RH 

1 are waived. The conference report shall be considered as 

2 read. 

3 SEC. 2. The Clerk shall not transmit to the Senate 

4 a message that it has adopted the conference report to 

5 accompany H.R. 3 until the House has received a message 

6 that the Senate has agreed to House Concurrent Resolu7 tion 226 as adopted by the House or passed H.R. 3514 

8 without amendment. 

House Calendar No. 79 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 399 

[Report No. 109–212] 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for the consideration of the conference 

purposes. ty programs, and transit programs, and for other ize funds for Federal-aid highways, highway safereport to accompany the bill (H.R. 3) to authorJULY 29 (legislative day, JULY 28), 2005 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed
-80 -79 -78 -77 -76 -75

38 39 40 41



### ★

▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 05/26 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 26 May 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 39.31 N 76.47 WMeters AGL
## F IFTH 

## D ISTRIC T 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE O F 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________ Case No. 5D 20 23 -2424 LT Case No s
. 2021-C F -7 67

2021- CF

- 114

_____________________________ V ICTOR L A G RANE O WENS , Appellant,

v. S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________
On appeal from the Ci rcuit Court for Putnam County

. Alicia R. Washington , Judge

. Matthew J. Metz, Public Defender, and Jane C. Almy, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach , for Appellant.
Ash ley Moody, Assis tant Attorney Gener al, Tallahassee, and Robin A. Compto n, Assistant Attorney General, Day tona Be ach, for Appellee. August 13, 2024

P ER C URIAM

. A FFIRMED

. K ILBANE , M A C I VER , and P RATT , JJ., concur
.2 _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331
.

_____________________________
§ 14.51 Procedures when employee drivers are sued. ( a ) Any NRC employee against whom a civil action or proceeding is brought for damage to property, or for personal injury or death, on account of the employee's operation of a motor vehicle in the scope of his or her office or employment with the NRC, shall promptly deliver all process and pleadings served upon the employee, or an attested true copy, to the Office of the General Counsel. If the action is brought against an employee's estate, this procedure applies to the employee's personal representative.
( b ) In addition, upon the employee's receipt of any process or pleadings, or any prior information regarding the commencement of a civil action or proceeding, the employee shall immediately advise the Office of the General Counsel by telephone or telegraph.
[47 FR 8983, Mar. 3, 1982, as amended at 51 FR 35999, Oct. 8, 1986]
1209.602 General.       (c) Contracting officers shall require offerors to disclose teaming arrangements as a part of any offer. The teaming arrangement shall be evaluated as a part of overall prime contractor responsibility, as well as under the technical and/or management approach evaluation factor where applicable.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 1209.6—Contractor Team Arrangements
227 So.2d 148

#### George J. ROUX v. NEW ORLEANS POLICE DEPARTMENT.

No. 50065.

Oct. 23, 1969.

In re: George J. Roux applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Civil Service Commission of the City of New Orleans, No. 440-A. 223 So.2d 905.

Writ refused. We find no error of law in the judgment of the Court of Appeal.
Case 2:06-cv-00784-MEF-WC Document 6 Filed 09/11/2006 Page 1 of 1