alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**CERTIFICATION**

Re: 

**Morgan Stanley Bank of America Merrill Lynch Trust 2013-C7, Commercial**

**Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2013-C7**(the "Transaction"), issued pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of January 1, 2013 (the "Pooling and Servicing Agreement"),  executed  in  connection  with  the  Transaction  (capitalized  terms  used  but  not defined herein have the meanings set forth in the Pooling and Servicing Agreement). 

__________________________________________ 

I, Steven Stern, certify that: 

1. 

I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required 

to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Morgan Stanley Bank of America Merrill Lynch Trust 2013-C7 (the "Exchange Act periodic reports"); 

2. 

Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do 

not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  

3. 

Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information 

required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;  

4. 

Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement(s) required in this 

report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports,  the  servicers  have  fulfilled  their  obligations  under  the  servicing  agreement(s)  in  all material respects; and 

5. 

All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-

backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.   

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me 

by the following unaffiliated parties: 

-U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee and certificate administrator 

-Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as custodian 

-Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, as master servicer and special servicer 

-Situs Holdings, LLC, as trust advisor 

-Berkadia Commercial Mortgage LLC, as a sub-servicer 

Date:  April 14, 2014 

By :    
/s/ Steven Stern

                                           Name:  Steven Stern       Title:  President
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Frank Ferrara, Appellant.

Judgment of the County Court, Nassau County, rendered April 30, 1979, affirmed. No opinion. This case is remitted to the County Court, Nassau County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (subd 5). Damiani, J. P., Cohalan, Margett and Weinstein, JJ., concur.
#### In the Matter of the Estate of Hyman Alpert, Deceased. Jack Alpert, as Executor of William Alpert, Deceased Executor and Trustee of Hyman Alpert, Deceased, et al., Respondents; Gail Alpert Kramer et al., Appellants.

Submitted December 3, 2007;

decided January 10, 2008

Reported below, 37 AD3d 187.

Motion for reargument of motion for leave to appeal denied with $100 costs and necessary reproduction disbursements *[see*9 NY3d 812 (2007)].
1913.505-2 Board order forms in lieu of

Optional and Standard Forms.

(a) Optional Forms 347 and 348 shall be used as prescribed in FAR 13.505 unless an equivalent form

has been authorized for use by the Board Procurement Executive (or Designee). Exceptions may be

granted, on a case-by-case basis, in order to accommodate computer-generated purchase order

forms. Exception approval for over printing (FAR 53.104) is not needed.

(b) The Broadcasting Board of Governors Form IA-44 (see 1953.370-44) is authorized for use when

obtaining nonpersonal services on an intermittent basis for such services as script writers,

translators, narrators, etc.

Parent topic: Subpart 1913.5 - Purchase Orders
§ 1707.208 Restrictions that apply to released records. ( a ) The General Counsel may impose conditions or restrictions on the release of official records and information, including the requirement that parties to the proceeding obtain a protective order or execute a confidentiality agreement to limit access and any further disclosure. The terms of the protective order or of a confidentiality agreement must be acceptable to the General Counsel. In cases where protective orders or confidentiality agreements have already been executed, DNFSB may condition the release of official records and information on an amendment to the existing protective order or confidentiality agreement.
( b ) If the General Counsel so determines, original DNFSB records may be presented for examination in response to a demand or request, but they are not to be presented as evidence or otherwise used in a manner by which they could lose their identity as official DNFSB records, nor are they to be marked or altered. In lieu of the original records, certified copies will be presented for evidentiary purposes (see 28 U.S.C. 1733).
#### § 205.288 Interim and ancillary orders.

The Director of the Office of Hearings and Appeals or his designee may issue any interim or ancillary orders, or make any rulings or determinations to ensure that refund proceedings, including the actions of the administrator and the custodian of the funds involved in a refund proceeding, are conducted in an appropriate manner and are not unduly delayed.
Exhibit 99.1



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of WaterChef, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David
A. Conway, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



/s/  David A. Conway
-----------------------
     David A. Conway
     President and Chief Executive Officer
     and Chief Financial Officer


July 9, 2003
|  |
|--|

|    Short Contents | Full Contents | Other books@NCBI |
|--------------------------------------------------|------------------|

| NavigationAbout this bookAHCPR Supported Consumer Guides (English)15. Treating Pressure SoresWhat Is a Pressure Sore?Purpose of This BookletTreatmentHelping Pressure Sores HealPain and InfectionChecking Your ProgressCare of Healthy Skin			For More Information		Be Active in Your CareAdditional ResourcesU.S. Department of Health and Human Services Public Health ServiceTablesFiguresSearch	 	 This book      All books PubMed | AHCPR Supported Consumer Guides (English)15. Treating Pressure SoresTreating Pressure Sores
Consumer Guide Number 15

AHCPR Publication No. 95-0654:

 December 1994 |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

**Copyright and Disclaimer**
Exhibit 3.1
 C201004000200
 SOSID: 0050028
Date Filed: 2/10/2010 8:56:00 AM
Elaine F. Marshall
North Carolina Secretary of State
C201004000200
 State of North Carolina
Department of the Secretary of State
 ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT
BUSINESS CORPORATION
  1.
    
    The name of the corporation is: Insteel Industries, Inc.2.
    
    The text of the amendment adopted is as follows (State below or attach):
 The Articles of Incorporation are amended by deleting the first sentence of Article IV thereof and
substituting that sentence with the following sentence:
 The corporation shall have authority to issue Fifty-One Million (51,000,000) shares
of stock, consisting of: Fifty Million (50,000,000) shares of a class designated
Common Stock (No Par Value); and One Million (1,000,000) shares of a class
designated No Par Preferred Stock, having no par value.
 3.
    
    The date of adoption of the amendment was February 9,
2010.4.
    
    (Check either a, b, c, or d, whichever is applicable)a.___The amendment(s) was (were) duly adopted by the incorporators prior to the issuance of shares.b.___The amendment(s) was (were) duly adopted by the board of directors prior to the issuance of shares.c.___The amendment(s) was (were) duly adopted by the board of directors without shareholder action
as shareholder action was not required because (set forth a brief explanation of why shareholder action
was not required.)d.XThe amendment was approved by shareholder action, and such shareholder approval was obtained
as required by Chapter 55 of the North Carolina General Statutes.5.
    
    These articles will be effective upon filing.
 th
 INSTEEL INDUSTRIES, INC.By:
    
    /s/ James F. PetelleName:
    
    James F. PetelleTitle:
    
    Vice President and Secretary
1253.300-70 DOT agency forms.

This subpart identifies, in numerical sequence, agency forms that are specified by the TAR for use in

acquisitions. See table 1 to 1253.300–70. Forms are also accessible in Adobe PDF and Microsoft

Word files on the DOT Office of Senior Procurement Executive website at

https://www.transportation.gov/assistant-secretary-administration/procu....

Table 1 to 1253.300–70—Forms Used in DOT Acquisitions

Form name Form No.

Contractor's Release Form 4220.4

Contractor's Assignment of Refunds, Rebates, Credits, and other Amounts. 4220.45

Cumulative Claim and Reconciliation Statement 4220.46

Parent topic: Subpart 1253.3—Forms Used in Acquisitions
PGI 215.404-70 DD Form 1547, Record of Weighted Guidelines Method Application.       (1) The DD Form 1547—          (i) Provides a vehicle for performing the analysis necessary to develop a profit objective; and          (ii) Provides a format for summarizing profit amounts subsequently negotiated as part of the contract price.          (2) The contracting officer shall—          (i) Use and prepare a DD Form 1547 whenever a structured approach to profit analysis is required by DFARS 215.404-4(b) (see DFARS 215.404-71, 215.404-72, and 215.404-73 for guidance on using the structured approaches). Administrative instructions for completing the form are in PGI                 253.215-70             .          (ii) Ensure that the DD Form 1547 is accurately completed. The contracting officer is responsible for the correction of any errors detected by the management system auditing process.    **Parent topic:** PGI 215.404 Proposal analysis.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

vs. ) Criminal Case No. 2:06-cr-200-CSC

)

ROSA E. RINCON )

MOTION IN LIMINE

COMES NOW Defendant, by and through counsel, and prays that this Court will Order

in limine that the government refrain from arguing, eliciting testimony, or offering evidence of

any sort establishing that Defendant is in the United States unlawfully, and in support of which

would show the Court as follows:

1. Such evidence would be irrelevant and its admission would be prohibited by Rule 402,

Federal Rules of Evidence.

2. To the extent that such evidence would be relevant, its admission would be harshly

prejudicial to Defendant and its admission would be prohibited by Rule 403, F.R.Evid.

3. Such evidence would be in the nature of “character” evidence and, failing of one of the

exceptions stated, would be inadmissible under Rule 608, F.R.Evid.

WHEREFORE, the premises considered, Defendant prays that the Court will order in

limine that the government be prohibited from offering or alluding to such evidence in any way

or by any means, including cross-examination of Defendant, and that the government be directed

to instruct its witnesses that they not refer in any way to the status of Defendant.

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, this __21st__ day of September, 2006.

/s/ JAY LEWIS

Law Offices of Jay Lewis, L.L.C.

Case 2:06-cr-00200-WHA-CSC Document 42 Filed 09/21/2006 Page 1 of 2
P.O. Box 5059

Montgomery, Alabama 36103

(334) 263-7733 (Voice)

(334) 832-4390 (Fax)

J-Lewis@JayLewisLaw.com

ASB-2014-E66J

Attorney for Defendant

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on the _21st_ day of September, 2006, I electronically filed the

foregoing with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of

such filing to the following parties or counsel:

Terry Moorer

Office of the United States Attorney

One Court Square, Suite 201

Montgomery, AL 36104

/s/ JAY LEWIS

Law Offices of Jay Lewis, L.L.C.

P.O. Box 5059

Montgomery, Alabama 36103

(334) 263-7733 (Voice)

(334) 832-4390 (Fax)

J-Lewis@JayLewisLaw.com

ASB-2014-E66J

Attorney for Defendant

Case 2:06-cr-00200-WHA-CSC Document 42 Filed 09/21/2006 Page 2 of 2
#### § 39.51 Use of a sealed source in a well without a surface casing.

The licensee may use a sealed source in a well without a surface casing for protecting fresh water aquifers only if the licensee follows a procedure for reducing the probability of the source becoming lodged in the well. The procedure must be approved by the Commission pursuant to § 39.13(c) or by an Agreement State.
IV 

House Calendar No. 19 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 134 

[Report No. 109–34] 

Requesting the President to transmit to the House of Representatives certain 

information relating to plan assets and liabilities of single-employer pension plans. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 2, 2005 

Mr. GEORGE MILLER of California submitted the following resolution; which 

was referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce 

APRIL 12, 2005 

Reported adversely from the Committee on Education and the Workforce, 

referred to the House Calendar, and ordered to be printed 

RESOLUTION 

Requesting the President to transmit to the House of Representatives certain information relating to plan assets 

and liabilities of single-employer pension plans. 

1 Resolved, That the President is hereby requested to 

2 transmit to the House of Representatives, not later than 

3 14 days after the date of the adoption of this resolution, 

4 copies of all information in his possession relating to the 

5 2 most recent plan years of single-employer pension plans 
2

•HRES 134 RH 

1 preceding the date of the adoption of this resolution, con2 sisting of—

3 (1) information described in paragraphs (1) and 

4 (2) of section 4010.8(a) of title 29, Code of Federal 

5 Regulations, with respect to such plans, and 

6 (2) the identity of the contributing sponsors of 

7 such plans. 

House Calendar No. 19

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 134

[Report No. 109–34] 

RESOLUTION

Requesting the President to transmit to the House 

sion plans. plan assets and liabilities of single-employer penof Representatives certain information relating to 

APRIL 12, 2005

Reported adversely from the Committee on Education 

and ordered to be printedand the Workforce, referred to the House Calendar,
Case 2:06-cv-00790-WC Document 36-2 Filed 04/24/2007 Page 1 of 10
Case 2:06-cv-00790-WC Document 36-2 Filed 04/24/2007 Page 2 of 10
Case 2:06-cv-00790-WC Document 36-2 Filed 04/24/2007 Page 3 of 10
Case 2:06-cv-00790-WC Document 36-2 Filed 04/24/2007 Page 4 of 10
Case 2:06-cv-00790-WC Document 36-2 Filed 04/24/2007 Page 5 of 10
Case 2:06-cv-00790-WC Document 36-2 Filed 04/24/2007 Page 6 of 10
Case 2:06-cv-00790-WC Document 36-2 Filed 04/24/2007 Page 7 of 10
Case 2:06-cv-00790-WC Document 36-2 Filed 04/24/2007 Page 8 of 10
Case 2:06-cv-00790-WC Document 36-2 Filed 04/24/2007 Page 9 of 10
Case 2:06-cv-00790-WC Document 36-2 Filed 04/24/2007 Page 10 of 10
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED  BALANCE  SHEET  AS OF  SEPTEMBER  30,  1996,  AND  THE  STATEMENT  OF
OPERATIONS  FOR THE PERIOD ENDED  SEPTEMBER  30,  1996,  AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   Sep-30-1996
<CASH>                                         14
<SECURITIES>                                   10,389
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               10,403
<PP&E>                                         0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 10,403
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          12
<BONDS>                                        0
<COMMON>                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<OTHER-SE>                                     10,391
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   10,403
<SALES>                                        43,186
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               43,921
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               483
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                43,438
<INCOME-TAX>                                   320
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            43,118
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   43,118
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  95.15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        


</TABLE>
SUBPART 27.1 – GENERAL

(Revised September 19, 2016 through PROCLTR 2016-09)

Parent topic: PART 27 – PATENTS, DATA, AND COPYRIGHTS

27.101 Applicability.

Refer all patent, copyright, rights in data, and trademark matters through the Office of Counsel to

DLA General Counsel.
#### Francis W. Reilly et al., Appellants, v. Town of Brookhaven et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants.

In a taxpayers’ action to declare null and void a certain franchise agreement and an amendment thereof, which were entered into between defendants Town of Brookhaven and Emjay Properties, Inc., plaintiffs appeal (1) from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, entered July 18, 1969 and amended by an order of said court entered October 9, 1969; (2) from the order of said court, entered June 6, 1969, which judgment and order provide (a) that the motions of defendants Town of Brook-haven and Tinker National Bank to dismiss the complaint on the ground of a defense based on documentary evidence (CPLR 3211, subd. [a], par. 1) are granted; (b) that the motion of defendants Emjay Properties, Inc., and Emjay Properties (a partnership) to require plaintiffs to make their complaint more definite and certain and to strike certain matter therefrom (CPLR 3024, subds. [a], [b]) is denied as academic in view of said provision dismissing the complaint; and (e) that plaintiffs’ cross motion for summary judgment is denied; and (3) from stated parts of the order of said court entered October 9, 1969 which amended the judgment. Order entered October 9, 1969 affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs. No opinion. Judgment reversed, on the law and the facts, without costs. Order entered June 6, 1969 modified, on the law and the facts, by striking therefrom all the decretal paragraphs except the one which denied plaintiffs’ cross motion and by substituting for said paragraphs a provision that said motions by said defendants are denied. As so modified, order affirmed, without costs. Respondents’ time to answer the complaint is extended until 20 days after service of the order hereon with notice of entry. In our opinion, the complaint, *inter alia,*states a cause of action challenging the legality of a contract under which a public building was constructed allegedly in violation of the requirements for public bidding *under*section 103 of the General Municipal Law. Plaintiffs as taxpayers have standing to bring this action (General Municipal Law, § 51; *Gere of*v. *Sweeney,*16 N Y 2d 206). There are factual issues not disposed of as a matter of law by the documentary evidence submitted. Disposition of these issues will require a trial. We find the motion of defendants Emjay Properties, Inc., and Emjay Properties (a partnership) to be without merit. The complaint advises defendants of the nature of the action and the relief sought. It does not contain any scandalous or prejudical matter. Christ, P. J., Rabin, Hopkins, Martuscello and Brennan, JJ., concur.
PGI 216.405-2 Cost-plus-award-fee contracts.       (1) Although weighted guidelines do not apply per DFARS 216.405-2(3)(ii) when definitizing a contract action, the contracting officer shall, nevertheless, separately assess and document the reduced cost risk on the contract for—          (i) The period up to the date of definitization; as well as          (ii) The remaining period of performance (see DFARS 217.7404-6).          (2) Normally, award fee is not earned when the fee-determining official has determined that contractor performance has been submarginal or unsatisfactory.          (3) The basis for all award fee determinations shall be documented in the contract file.          (4) The cost-plus-award-fee contract is also suitable for level of effort contracts where mission feasibility is established but measurement of achievement must be by subjective evaluation rather than objective measurement. See Table 16-1, Performance Evaluation Criteria, for sample performance evaluation criteria and Table 16-2, Contractor Performance Evaluation Report, for a sample evaluation report.          (5) The contracting activity may—          (i) Establish a board to—          (A) Evaluate the contractor's performance; and          (B) Determine the amount of the award or recommend an amount to the contracting officer; and          (ii) Afford the contractor an opportunity to present information on its own behalf.    **Parent topic:** PGI 216.405 Cost-reimbursement incentive contracts.
PGI 208.705 Procedures.

Ordering offices may use DD Form 1155, Order for Supplies or Services, to place orders with central

nonprofit agencies.

Parent topic: PGI 208.4 -FEDERAL SUPPLY SCHEDULES
Case 1:06-cv-00775-TFM Document 14 Filed 10/04/2006 Page 1 of 1
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-14-0000875

27-AUG-2014

08:31 AM