alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
      32





**Certification
      Pursuant to 18. U.S.C. Section 1350,**


**As
      Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002**





In
      connection with the annual report of B.H.I.T., Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q
      for the quarter ending March 31, 2008 (the “Report”) filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, the undersigned, being the Interim
      Chief Executive Officer and Interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
      certifes, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of § 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/
                Paul S. DennisPaul
                S. DennisInterim
                Chief Executive Officerand
                Interim Chief Financial Officer





Date:
      May
      14, 2008
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS 

FORT WORTH 

NO. 02-15-00216-CR 

Andrewnik Thomas 

v. 

The State of Texas 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

From County Criminal Court No. 1 

of Denton County (CR-2014-08535-A) 

July 14, 2016 

Opinion by Chief Justice Livingston 

(nfp) 

JUDGMENT 

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of 

the trial court is affirmed. 

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Terrie Livingston 

 Chief Justice Terrie Livingston
EXHIBIT 23.1





TBPE REGISTERED ENGINEERING FIRM F-1580FAX (713) 651-08491100 LOUISIANA STREETSUITE 4600HOUSTON, TEXAS 77002-5294TELEPHONE (713) 651-9191








CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS AND GEOLOGISTS











We hereby consent to the references in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014, of Gulf Coast Ultra Deep Royalty Trust, including the Notes to the Financial Statements included in such Form 10-K, to all references to our firm name and to our reserve reports prepared for Gulf Coast Ultra Deep Royalty Trust (the “Royalty Trust”) relating to the estimated quantities of certain of the Royalty Trust’s proved reserves of oil and gas and present values thereof as of December 31, 2014.








/s/ RYDER SCOTT COMPANY, L.P.








RYDER SCOTT COMPANY, L.P.


TBPE Firm Registration No. F-1580

















Houston, Texas


March 16, 2015


















































SUITE  600,  1015  4TH  STREET, S.W.       CALGARY, ALBERTA T2R 1J4    TEL (403) 262-2799    FAX (403) 262-2790
 621  17TH STREET, SUITE 1550    DENVER, COLORADO 80293-1501    TEL (303) 623-9147    FAX (303) 623-4258
#### § 490.605 Statement of enforcement policy.

DOE may agree not to commence an enforcement proceeding, or may agree to settle an enforcement proceeding, if the person agrees to come into compliance in a manner satisfactory to DOE. DOE normally will not commence an enforcement action against a person subject to the acquisition requirements of this part without giving that person notice of its intent to enforce 90 days before the beginning of an enforcement proceeding.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

RUSSELL E. GARNER, *

*

Plaintiff, *

*

vs. * CASE NUMBER: 01:06cv781-MHT

*

PROGRESSIVE DIRECT INSURANCE*

COMPANY, *

*

 Defendant. *

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

COMES NOW the undersigned attorney and enters his formal appearance as additional

counsel on behalf of the defendant in this matter.

Respectfully Submitted,

s/Jeffrey G. Hunter 

 JEFFREY G. HUNTER(HUN028)

Attorney for Progressive Direct

Insurance Company

OF COUNSEL

Nix, Holtsford, Gilliland,

Higgins, & Hitson, P.C.

P.O. Box 4128

Montgomery, AL 36103

334-215-8585

Case 1:06-cv-00781-MHT-TFM Document 21 Filed 03/09/2007 Page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that a copy of the foregoing has been served via first class mail, postage prepaid on

March 9, 2007 to the following:

David W. Rousseau

211 W. Adams Street

Dothan, Alabama 36303

s/Jeffrey G. Hunter 

OF COUNSEL

Case 1:06-cv-00781-MHT-TFM Document 21 Filed 03/09/2007 Page 2 of 2
Case 2:06-cv-00704-WKW-CSC Document 3 Filed 08/30/2006 Page 1 of 1
PGI 225.7302 Preparation of Letter of Offer

and Acceptance.

(2) The contracting officer shall—

(i) Assist the DoD implementing agency, as necessary, in preparation of the Letter of Offer and

Acceptance;

(ii) Identify and explain all unusual contractual requirements or requests for deviations; and

(iii) Assist in preparing the price and availability data.

Parent topic: PGI 225.73 -ACQUISITIONS FOR FOREIGN MILITARY SALES
Subpart 845.4 - Title to Government Property

Parent topic: PART 845 - GOVERNMENT PROPERTY

845.402 Title to contractor-acquired property.

845.402-70 Policy.

(a) For other than firm-fixed-price contracts, contractor-acquired property items not anticipated at

time of contract award, or not otherwise specified for delivery on an existing line item, shall, by

means of a contract modification, be specified for delivery to the Government on an added contract

line item. The value of such contractor-acquired property item shall be recorded at the original

purchase cost. Unless otherwise noted by the contractor at the time of delivery to the Government,

the placed-in-service date shall be the date of acquisition or completed manufacture, if fabricated.

(b) Following delivery and acceptance by the Government of contractor-acquired property items, if

these items are to be retained by the contractor for continued use under a successor contract, these

items become Government-furnished property (GFP). The items shall be added to the successor

contract as GFP by contract modification.

(c) Individual contractor-acquired property items should be recorded in the contractor's property

management system at the contractor's original purchase cost.

(d) All other contractor inventory that is excess to the needs of the contract shall be disposed of in

accordance with FAR subpart 45.6.
PGI 228.305 Overseas workers' compensation and war-hazard insurance.       (d) Submit requests for waiver through department/agency channels. Include the following in the request:          (i) Name and address of contractor.          (ii) Contract number.          (iii) Date of award.          (iv) Place of performance.          (v) Name of insurance company providing Defense Base Act coverage.          (vi) Nationality of employees to whom waiver is to apply.          (vii) Reason for waiver.    **Parent topic:** PGI 228.3 -INSURANCE
227 So.2d 147

#### Azema LeBlanc HEBERT et al. v. SUN OIL COMPANY et al.

No. 50059.

Oct. 23, 1969.

In re: Azema LeBlanc Hebert et al. applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Lafayette. 223 So.2d 897.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal, there is no error of law in its judgment.
CASE ANNOUNCEMENTS

*February 14, 2008*

[Cite as *02114/2008 Case Announcements,*2008-Ohio-564.]

MOTION AND PROCEDURAL RULINGS

2007-1819.

#### Louden v. A.W. Chesterton Co.

Cuyahoga App. No. 90184. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County. Upon consideration of appellants’ motion to consolidate this case with 2007-1821, *Louden v. AW. Chesterton Co.,*Cuyahoga App. No. 90185,

It is ordered by the court that the motion is granted.

It is further ordered by the court that briefing in this case and 2007-1821 shall be consolidated. The parties shall file two originals of each of the briefs permitted under S.Ct.Prac.R. VI and include both case numbers on the cover page of the briefs. The parties shall otherwise comply with the requirements of S.Ct.Prac.R. VI.
PGI 203.570-1 Scope.       The complete text of 10 U.S.C. 4656, Prohibition on Persons Convicted of Defense-Contract Related Felonies and Related Criminal Penalty on Defense Contractors, is available at http://uscode.house.gov/. (Select “Search the U.S. Code”; then type “10 USC Sec. 4656” (including the quotation marks) in the search engine window and click on the search button).    **Parent topic:** PGI 203.570 Prohibition on persons convicted of fraud or other defense-contract-related felonies.
Case 3:06-cv-00772-WKW-TFM Document 17 Filed 03/07/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 3:06-cv-00772-WKW-TFM Document 17 Filed 03/07/2007 Page 2 of 2
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION

DELOISE PRICE, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

v. ) 2:06cv721-MHT

) 

WAL-MART STORES, INC., and )

EXTREME PERFORMANCE, INC., )

)

Defendants. )

ORDER

Because of a scheduling conflict, it is ORDERED the

uniform scheduling order (Doc. No. 9) is modified in the

following respects:

(1) The pretrial is reset for October 18, 2007, at

10:30 a.m., and the trial is reset for the term

of court beginning on November 26, 2007, with

all deadlines expressly tied to these two dates

adjusted accordingly.

(2) All other deadlines are unchanged.

DONE, this the 15th day of August, 2007.

 /s/ Myron H. Thompson 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00721-MHT-TFM Document 26 Filed 08/15/2007 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

OFFICE OF THE CLERK

POST OFFICE BOX 711

MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA 36101-0711

DEBRA P. HACKETT, CLERK

TELEPHONE (334) 954-3600

October 23, 2006

NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY

To: Attorney Randolph Phillips

From: Clerk’s Office

Case Style: Burkett v. McCray et al

Case Number: 1:06-cv-00775-DRB

Referenced Pleading: Petition to appear pro hac vice

Docket Entry # 18

Certificate of Service was not signed; or the pleading contains no certificate of service

This deficiency must be corrected within ten (10) days from this date. You must file a signed

certificate of service for the referenced pleading containing your original signature reflecting

that this pleading was served on all parties.

DO NOT E-FILE YOUR CORRECTION.......IT MUST BE MAILED TO THE CLERK’S

OFFICE, ALONG WITH A COPY OF THIS NOTICE.

Case 1:06-cv-00775-TFM Document 20 Filed 10/23/2006 Page 1 of 1
#### § 948.59 Qualification.

Each person selected as a member or as an alternate shall qualify by promptly filing a written acceptance with the Secretary.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY WASHINGTON, DC

Served: August 11, 2010

NOTICE SHORTENING ANSWER PERIOD

On August 5, 2010, the State of Alaska filed an application requesting that the Department reinstate certain blanket exemption authori ties from 49 U.S.C. §41301, to allow foreign air

carriers authorized to serve the United States to engage in expande d cargo transfer and air service at Ted Stevens Anchorage International Ai rport and Fairbanks International Airport.

The State of Alaska included in its applicati on a motion to shorten the answer period for its request. Answers would normally be due August 23, 2010, and the State of Alaska asked that we instead set August 16, 2010, as the due date for answers.

In the circumstances presented, we have decided to grant the applicant’s request to shorten the answer period for this applic ation to August 16, 2010. Any rep lies to answers will be due August 19, 2010. We find that such action is warrante d in the public interest in order to allow us to act in an expeditious manner on the request of the State of Al aska to reinstate the described authorities that have previously been granted by the Department.

We will serve this notice by elec tronic mail on all parties served with the application, and hereby authorize service of documents by facsimile and by electronic mail.

By:

PAUL L. GRETCH

Director

Office of International Aviation

(SEAL)

Dated: August 11, 2010

An electronic version of this notice is available on the World Wide Web at www.regulations.gov Application of the State of Alaska for an Exemption for Expanded Cargo Transfer Authority and Expanded Air Services at International Airports in Alaska

Dockets DOT-OST-2010-0200, 1999-5035, and 1996-1600
Editorial Note on Part 51
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 51 appear at 80 FR 74980, Dec. 1, 2015.

§ 51.116 Notice of intent. ( a ) In accordance with § 51.26, the appropriate NRC staff director will publish in the Federal Register a notice of intent stating that an environmental impact statement will be prepared. The notice will contain the information specified in § 51.27.
( b ) Copies of the notice will be sent to appropriate Federal, State, and local agencies, and Indian Tribes, appropriate State, regional, and metropolitan clearinghouses and to interested persons upon request. A public announcement of the notice of intent will also be made.
227 So.2d 593

#### E. E. RABALAIS & SON, INC. v. UNITED BONDING INSURANCE COMPANY et al.

No. 50113.

Nov. 12, 1969.

In re: United Bonding Insurance Company applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Avoyelles. 226 So.2d 528.

Writ refused. Under the facts found by the Court of Appeal, we find no error of law in the judgment complained of.
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


The undersigned  hereby certify  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that the quarterly
report of United States Basketball League, Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly
period ended November 30, 2005 fully complies with the  requirements  of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 and that the  information
contained  in such  quarterly  report  on Form  10-QSB  fairly  presents  in all
material  respects the  financial  condition  and results of operation of United
States Basketball League, Inc.

Date: March 7, 2006


/s/Daniel T. Meisenheimer, III
-------------------------------
Daniel T. Meisenheimer, III
President



Date: March 7, 2006

/s/Richard C. Meisenheimer
-------------------------------
Richard C. Meisenheimer
Chief Financial Officer
Case 3:06-cv-00773-WKW-CSC Document 1 Filed 08/28/2006 Page 1 of 5
Case 3:06-cv-00773-WKW-CSC Document 1 Filed 08/28/2006 Page 2 of 5
Case 3:06-cv-00773-WKW-CSC Document 1 Filed 08/28/2006 Page 3 of 5
Case 3:06-cv-00773-WKW-CSC Document 1 Filed 08/28/2006 Page 4 of 5
Case 3:06-cv-00773-WKW-CSC Document 1 Filed 08/28/2006 Page 5 of 5
§ 435.3 Materials incorporated by reference. ( a ) Certain material is incorporated by reference into this subpart with the approval of the Director of the Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. To enforce any edition other than that specified in this section, DOE must publish a document in the Federal Register and the material must be available to the public. All approved material is available for inspection at DOE, and at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). Contact DOE at: The U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Building Technologies Program, Sixth Floor, 950 L'Enfant Plaza SW, Washington, DC 20024, (202) 586-9127, *Buildings@ee.doe.gov , https://www.energy.gov/eere/buildings/building-technologies-office .* For information on the availability of this material at NARA, email: *fr.inspection@nara.gov ,* or go to: *www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html .* The material may be obtained from the sources in the following paragraphs of this section.
( b ) *ICC.* International Code Council, 4051 West Flossmoor Road, Country Club Hills, IL 60478, 1-888-422-7233, or go to *http://www.iccsafe.org/ .* ( 1 ) ICC International Energy Conservation Code (IECC), 2004 Supplement Edition (“IECC 2004”), January 2005, IBR approved for §§ 435.2, 435.4, 435.5;
( 2 ) ICC International Energy Conservation Code (IECC), 2009 Edition (“IECC 2009”), January 2009, IBR approved for §§ 435.2, 435.4, 435.5.
( 3 ) ICC International Energy Conservation Code (IECC), 2015 Edition (“IECC 2015”), published May 30, 2014, IBR approved for §§ 435.2, 435.4, 435.5.
( 4 ) ICC 2021 International Energy Conservation Code (IECC), Redline Version, Copyright 2021, (“IECC 2021”), IBR approved for §§ 435.2, 435.4, and 435.5.
[76 FR 49285, Aug. 10, 2011, as amended at 82 FR 2867, Jan. 10, 2017; 87 FR 19613, Apr. 5, 2022]
Case 2:06-cv-00766-MHT-TFM Document 4 Filed 08/31/2006 Page 1 of 1
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. James Robert Outcalt, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered July 26, 1967, convicting him of feloniously selling a narcotic drug and unlawfully possessing a narcotic drug, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Judgment reversed, on the law, in the exercise of discretion and in the interests of justice, and new trial ordered. The findings of fact below are affirmed. Although the right to a public trial (Code Crim. Pro., § 8, subd. 1; Civil Rights Law, § 12; ef. U. S. Const., 6th Arndt.) is not absolute, being “ subject to the inherent power of the court to preserve order and decorum in the courtroom, to protect the rights of parties and witnesses, and generally to further the administration of justice ” *(People*v. *Jelke,*308 N. Y. 56, 63; see, also, Judiciary Law, § 4), in our opinion defendant’s right to a public trial was violated when the Trial Justice excluded from the courtroom “ anybody * * *' connected in any way with the defendant’s case.” Two of the persons so excluded were defendant’s brothers who clearly indicated to the court that they were not going to be called to testify. On this record, it cannot be said that there was any reasonable basis for excluding them (cf. *State*v. *Haskins,*38 N. J. Super. 250). Christ, Acting P. J., Benjamin, Martuseello and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur; Munder, J., dissents and votes to affirm the judgment.
Case 2:06-cv-00756-MHT-WC Document 20 Filed 10/26/2006 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:06-cv-00756-MHT-WC Document 20 Filed 10/26/2006 Page 2 of 2
#### Tamra Gould, on Behalf of Herself and All Other Persons Similarly Situated, Appellant, v J. Henry Schroder Bank & Trust Company et al., Respondents.

In an action (1) to recover damages for breach of fiduciary duty by the defendant bank as indenture trustee and (2) for a judgment declaring a certain bond issue of the defendant corporation due and payable, plaintiff, a bondholder, appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered July 8, 1980, which (1) granted defendants’ motions to dismiss the complaint and (2) denied plaintiff’s application for leave to serve an amended complaint. *Order*modified, on the law, by adding thereto, immediately after the provision denying plaintiff’s application, the following: “except that plaintiff is granted leave to serve an amended complaint as to the first cause of action.” As so modified, order affirmed, without costs or disbursements. Plaintiff’s time to serve the amended complaint is extended until 20 days after service upon her of a copy of the order to be made hereon, together with notice of entry thereof. Special Term correctly found that the complaint insufficiently specified the circumstances constituting a breach of trust by the defendant bank (see CPLR 3016, subd [b]). Insofar as the complaint sought judgment declaring the debt due and payable, plaintiff failed to meet the defendant corporation’s documentary defense that acceleration of the debt upon occurrence of an event of default described in the indenture agreement was within the trustee’s discretion rather than automatic. Further, declaratory relief is not available to a creditor seeking only to establish the debtor’s insolvent status for the avowed purpose of filing a bankruptcy petition against the debtor; such a determination is within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Federal courts (see US Code, tit 11, § 303, subd [h], par [1]; US Code, tit 28, § 1471, subd [a]). Special Term erred, however, in denying leave to serve an amended complaint as to the first cause of action on the ground that plaintiff failed to meet certain conditions precedent to suit in the “no action” provisions of the indenture agreement. Such provisions are no bar to bondholders’ derivative actions arising out of the alleged breach of *871fiduciary duty by the indenture trustee (see *Campbell v Hudson & Manhattan R. R. Co.,*277 App Div 731, affd 302 NY 902). Therefore, we have modified the order to grant plaintiff leave to replead her first cause of action with the requisite specificity. Hopkins, J. P., Damiani, Titone and O’Connor, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.1

 

 

CertificationPursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of SEDONA Corporation (“SEDONA”) on Form 10-Qfor the three months ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David R. Vey,Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer of SEDONACorporation certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of SEDONACorporation.

 

 
| Dated: May 17, 2010 | /s/ DAVID R. VEY                             |   |
|---------------------|----------------------------------------------|--------|
|                | David R. Vey                                 |
| * *            | *Chairman of the Board and Chief  Executive* |
| * *            | *Officer*                                    |
|                | *(Principal Executive Officer)*              |

 

33

----
Editorial Note on Part 34
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 34 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

§ 34.45 Operating and emergency procedures. ( a ) Operating and emergency procedures must include, as a minimum, instructions in the following: ( 1 ) Appropriate handling and use of licensed sealed sources and radiographic exposure devices so that no person is likely to be exposed to radiation doses in excess of the limits established in 10 CFR part 20 of this chapter “Standards for Protection Against Radiation”;
( 2 ) Methods and occasions for conducting radiation surveys;
( 3 ) Methods for controlling access to radiographic areas;
( 4 ) Methods and occasions for locking and securing radiographic exposure devices, transport and storage containers and sealed sources;
( 5 ) Personnel monitoring and the use of personnel monitoring equipment;
( 6 ) Transporting sealed sources to field locations, including packing of radiographic exposure devices and storage containers in the vehicles, placarding of vehicles when needed, and control of the sealed sources during transportation (refer to 49 CFR parts 171-173);
( 7 ) The inspection, maintenance, and operability checks of radiographic exposure devices, survey instruments, transport containers, and storage containers;
( 8 ) Steps that must be taken immediately by radiography personnel in the event a pocket dosimeter is found to be off-scale or an alarm ratemeter alarms unexpectedly.
( 9 ) The procedure(s) for identifying and reporting defects and noncompliance, as required by 10 CFR part 21 of this chapter;
( 10 ) The procedure for notifying proper persons in the event of an accident;
( 11 ) Minimizing exposure of persons in the event of an accident;
( 12 ) Source recovery procedure if licensee will perform source recovery;
( 13 ) Maintenance of records.
( b ) The licensee shall maintain copies of current operating and emergency procedures in accordance with §§ 34.81 and 34.89.