alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
`[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 395 Reported in House (RH)]







                                                  House Calendar No. 77
109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 395

                          [Report No. 109-201]

      Providing for consideration of motions to suspend the rules.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 27, 2005

    Mr. Putnam, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION


 
      Providing for consideration of motions to suspend the rules.

    Resolved,  That it shall be in order at any time on the legislative 
day of Thursday, July 28, 2005, for the Speaker to entertain motions 
that the House suspend the rules. The Speaker or his designee shall 
consult with the Minority Leader or her designee on the designation of 
any matter for consideration pursuant to this resolution.




                                                  House Calendar No. 77

109th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                              H. RES. 395

                          [Report No. 109-201]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

      Providing for consideration of motions to suspend the rules.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             July 27, 2005

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed`
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATIONS



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350



The undersigned hereby certifies that (i) the foregoing quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A filed by Fountain Powerboat Industries, Inc. (the Company) for
the quarter ended December 31, 2004, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in that Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                        |  |                                      
|----------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: November 15, 2005 |  | /s/ Reginald M. Fountain, Jr.        
|                        |  | Reginald M. Fountain, Jr.            
|                        |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|                        | 
|Date: November 15, 2005 |  | /s/ Irving L. Smith                  
|                        |  | Irving L. Smith                      
|                        |  | Chief Financial Officer
PGI 245.103-74 Contracting office responsibilities.       (1) Prepare the GFP attachments in accordance with the procedures in PGI245.103 -72.          (2) The following require a contract modification and an update to the GFP attachment in the GFP module of the PIEE to create a consolidated, conformed list of property to be contractually provided under the contract.          (i) Any change to the mandatory fields of the GFP attachment (see PGI 245.103-72).          (ii) Addition or deletion of any GFP or anticipated GFP under the contract.          (iii) Transfer of GFP accountability between existing contracts (see PGI 245.103-71).          (iv) Delivery and Government acceptance of contractor-acquired property when retained by the contractor for use under a contract (see PGI 245.402-71).          (v) Substitution of GFP for previously furnished GFP, GFP to be furnished, or property to be acquired by the contractor for the Government under the contract.          (vi) Withdrawal of authority for contractor use of GFP.          (3) Include in applicable solicitations and contracts the CDRL provided by the requiring activity for reporting Government inventory held under sustainment contracts (see PGI 245.103-73 ).    **Parent topic:** PGI 245.103 General.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

 NORTHERN DIVISION

DENNIS L. FOLKS, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:06cv724-SRW

) (WO)

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL )

SECURITY, )

)

Defendant. )

JUDGMENT

Upon consideration of the motion to remand filed by the Commissioner on February

2, 2007, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of this court that the motion is

GRANTED, the decision of the Commissioner is REVERSED, and this action is

REMANDED to the Commissioner pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for

further proceedings as set forth in the Commissioner’s memorandum in support of her

motion.

DONE, this 2nd day of February, 2007.

/s/ Susan Russ Walker 

SUSAN RUSS WALKER

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00724-SRW Document 16 Filed 02/02/07 Page 1 of 1
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Willis Eve, Appellant, v. Vincent R. Mancusi, as Warden of Attica Prison, Respondent.

Judgment unanimously affirmed, without prejudice to an application in Supreme Court, New York County, for a writ of error *coram nobis.*(See *People*v. *Pohl,*23 N Y 2d 290.) (Appeal from judgment of Wyoming County Court, dismissing writ of habeas corpus.) Present—Del Veechio, J. P., Gabrielli, Moule and Henry, JJ.
Exhibit 33.2

[PHH LOGO]

REPORT ON ASSESSMENT
OF COMPLIANCE WITH REGULATION AB SERVICING CRITERIA

PHH Mortgage Corporation (the Asserting Party) is responsible for assessing compliance as
of December 31, 2013 and for the period from January 1, 2013 through December 31, 2013 (the Reporting Period) with the servicing criteria set forth in Section 229.1122(d) of the Code of Federal Regulations (the
CFR), except for criteria set forth in Section 229.1122(d)(3)(i)(c), (d)(4)(xv) and (d)(1)(iii) of the CFR, which the Asserting Party has concluded are not applicable to the servicing activities it performs with respect to the
transactions covered by this report (the Applicable Servicing Criteria). The criteria set forth in Section 229.1122 (d)(2)(i), (d)(2)(ii), (d)(4)(iv), (d)(4)(vii), (d)(4)(viii) and (d)(4)(xi) of the CFR are performed by outsource
providers on behalf of the Asserting Party; however, the Asserting Party has monitored the outsourcing of these criteria and assumes responsibility for compliance. The transactions covered by this report include all non-agency loan sale agreements
executed after January 1, 2006 as well as all re-securitization transactions after January 1, 2006 for which the Asserting Party served as servicer (the Platform).

The Asserting Party has assessed its compliance with the Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2013 and for the Reporting Period and has concluded that
the Asserting Party has complied, in all material respects, with the Applicable Servicing Criteria with respect to the Platform taken as a whole. Except the following was noted:



|                |  |                                                                                                                                                                                 
|--------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Standard        |  | Description                                                                                                                                                                     
|                | 
|1122(d)(4)(vii) |  | During the year ended December 31, 2013, it was determined certain foreclosure proceedings were not concluded in accordance with the published Fannie Mae foreclosure timelines.

Deloitte & Touche, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on the
assessment of compliance with the Servicing Criteria for the Reporting Period as set forth in this assertion.

PHH Mortgage Corporation

Date: February 28, 2014

/s/ David E. Tucker

David E. Tucker

President

/s/ Martin L. Foster

Martin L. Foster

Senior Vice President  Loan Servicing
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, SOUTHERN DIVISION

BUDDY GILL, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

v. ) 1:06cv718-MHT

) 

SORRELLS FUNERAL HOME, )

INC., and TERRY G. )

SORRELLS, )

)

Defendants. )

 RULE 26(F) ORDER

The parties are reminded of the obligation, imposed

by Rule 26(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, to

confer and to develop a proposed discovery plan.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Rule 26(f) report

containing the discovery plan shall be filed as soon as

practicable but not later than September 27, 2006.

The longstanding practice in this district is that

dispositive motions shall be filed no later than 90 days

prior to the pretrial date. If the parties seek to vary

from that schedule, they should present, in the plan,

Case 1:06-cv-00718-MHT-SRW Document 9 Filed 09/13/2006 Page 1 of 3
2

specific case-related reasons for the requested variance.

In their Rule 26(f) report, however, the parties should

assume that the 90-day requirement will apply.

This case will be set for trial before the

undersigned judge during one of that judge's regularly

scheduled civil trial terms, within 7 to 10 months of

this order if a term is available and, if not available,

then as soon as possible thereafter. The pretrial date

is normally set within four to six weeks of a scheduled

trial term. The dates of each judge's civil trial terms

are available on the court's website located at

<http://almd.uscourts.gov> in the civil case information

section.

The court may or may not hold a scheduling conference

before issuing a scheduling order. If the court holds a

scheduling conference, counsel may participate in the

scheduling conference by conference call.

The scheduling order entered by the court will follow

the form of the Uniform Scheduling Order adopted by the

Case 1:06-cv-00718-MHT-SRW Document 9 Filed 09/13/2006 Page 2 of 3
judges of this court. The Uniform Scheduling Order is

also available on the court's website.

The report of the parties should comply with Form 35

of the Appendix of Forms to the Federal Rules of Civil

Procedure.

DONE, this the 13th day of September, 2006.

 /s/ Myron H. Thompson 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00718-MHT-SRW Document 9 Filed 09/13/2006 Page 3 of 3
H. Res. 41

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

March 9, 2005.

Whereas April 6 has a special significance for all Americans,

and especially those Americans of Scottish descent, because the Declaration of Arbroath, the Scottish Declaration of Independence, was signed on April 6, 1320, and

the American Declaration of Independence was modeled

in part on that inspirational document;

Whereas this resolution honors the major role that ScottishAmericans played in the founding of the Nation, such as

the fact that almost half of the signers of the Declaration

of Independence were of Scottish descent, the Governors

in 9 of the original 13 States were of Scottish ancestry,

and Scottish-Americans successfully helped shape the Nation in its formative years and guide it through its most

troubled times;

Whereas this resolution recognizes the monumental achievements and invaluable contributions made by ScottishAmericans that have led to America’s preeminence in the

fields of science, technology, medicine, government, politics, economics, architecture, literature, media, and visual

and performing arts;

Whereas this resolution commends the more than 200 organizations throughout the United States that honor Scottish

heritage, tradition, and culture, representing the hun-
2

•HRES 41 EH

dreds of thousands of Americans of Scottish descent, residing in every State, who already have made the observance of Tartan Day on April 6 a success; and

Whereas these numerous individuals, clans, societies, clubs,

and fraternal organizations do not let the great contributions of the Scottish people go unnoticed: Now, therefore,

be it

Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives that a day should be established as ‘‘National Tartan

Day’’ to recognize the outstanding achievements and contributions made by Scottish-Americans to the United States.

Attest:

Clerk.
2401.000 Scope of part.       This part describes the method by which the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) implements, supplements and deviates from the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) through the establishment of the HUD Acquisition Regulation (HUDAR), which prescribes the Department's procurement policies and procedures under the FAR System.    **Parent topic:** PART 2401 - FEDERAL ACQUISITION REGULATION SYSTEM
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 33 (Friday, February 19, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 7485]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-3206]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Cancer Institute; Cancellation of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of the cancellation of the National Cancer 
Institute Special Emphasis Panel, February 24, 2010, 8 a.m. to February 
26, 2010, 6 p.m., Gaithersburg Marriott Washingtonian Center, 9751 
Washingtonian Blvd., Gaithersburg, MD 20878 which was published in the 
Federal Register on December 15, 2009, 74 FR 66367.
    Dr. Wirth's February 24-26, 2010 meeting has been cancelled.

    Dated: February 8, 2010.
Jennifer Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2010-3206 Filed 2-18-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
Case 2:06-cr-00200-WHA-CSC Document 9 Filed 07/14/2006 Page 1 of 1
2434.003 Responsibilities.

(a) The Senior Procurement Executive is responsible for establishing written procedures for

implementation of A-109. Such procedures have been set out in internal Departmental directives.

Parent topic: PART 2434 - MAJOR SYSTEM ACQUISITIONS
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 244 (Tuesday, December 21, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 80051]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-32016]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Performance Review Board

AGENCY: Federal Maritime Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the names of the members of the 
Performance Review Board.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Harriette H. Charbonneau, Director of 
Human Resources, Federal Maritime Commission, 800 North Capitol Street, 
NW., Washington, DC 20573.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 4314(c) (1) through (5) of title 5, 
U.S.C., requires each agency to establish, in accordance with 
regulations prescribed by the Office of Personnel Management, one or 
more performance review boards. The board shall review and evaluate the 
initial appraisal of a senior executive's performance by the 
supervisor, along with any recommendations to the appointing authority 
relative to the performance of the senior executive.

Richard A. Lidinsky, Jr.,
Chairman.

    The Members of the Performance Review Board are:
    1. Joseph E. Brennan, Commissioner.
    2. Rebecca F. Dye, Commissioner.
    3. Michael A. Khouri, Commissioner.
    4. Clay G. Guthridge, Administrative Law Judge.
    5. Erin M. Wirth, Administrative Law Judge.
    6. Florence A. Carr, Deputy Managing Director.
    7. Rebecca A. Fenneman, General Counsel.
    8. Karen V. Gregory, Secretary.
    9. Vern W. Hill, Director, Office of Consumer Affairs and Dispute 
Resolution Services.
    10. Peter J. King, Director, Bureau of Enforcement.
    11. Sandra L. Kusumoto, Director, Bureau of Certification and 
Licensing.
    12. Ronald D. Murphy, Managing Director.
    13. Austin L. Schmitt, Director, Bureau of Trade Analysis.

[FR Doc. 2010-32016 Filed 12-20-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
listofchangeincontrolexhibit.htm


     

    
      
        

      



    Exhibit
10.30

    


    Listing
of Executive Officers who are Parties to the Form of Change in Control Severance
Agreement (filed as Exhibit 10.28 to Compass Minerals International, Inc.’s
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 and amendment
filed as Exhibit 10.3 to Compass Minerals International, Inc.’s Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009) and Restrictive Covenant
Agreement (filed as Exhibit 10.4 to Compass Minerals International, Inc.’s
Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 23, 2006).

    


    Keith
Clark

    


    Rodney
Underdown

    


    Gerald
Bucan

    


    Ron
Bryan
#### § 434.103 Referenced standards (RS).

103.1 The standards, technical handbooks, papers and regulations listed in § 434.701, shall be considered part of this part to the prescribed extent of such reference. Where differences occur between the provisions of this part and referenced standards, the provisions of this part shall apply. Whenever a reference is made in this part to an RS standard it refers to the standards listed in § 434.701.
|                                           |
|-------------------------------------------|
|                                           |  |  |
| NETHERLAND, SEWELL & ASSOCIATES, INC. |
|                                      |   |   |
|                                      | By: | /s/ Danny D. Simmons |
|                                      |   | Danny D. Simmons, P.E. |
|                                      |   | President and Chief Operating Officer |
|                                      |   |   |
|                                      |   |   |
|                                      |   |   |
|                                      |   |   |
|                                      |   |   |
|                                      |   |   |
|                                      |   |   |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |  |  |  |
|   | Please be advised that the digital document you are viewing is provided by Netherland, Sewell & Associates, Inc. (NSAI) as a convenience to our clients.  The digital document is intended to be substantively the same as the original signed document maintained by NSAI.  The digital document is subject to the parameters, limitations, and conditions stated in the original document.  In the event of any differences between the digital document and the original document, the original document shall control and supersede the digital document. |
|   |
|   |

----
Case 2:06-cv-00758-LES-CSC Document 2 Filed 08/25/2006 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:06-cv-00758-LES-CSC Document 2 Filed 08/25/2006 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:06-cv-00737-WKW-SRW Document 46 Filed 02/16/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:06-cv-00737-WKW-SRW Document 46 Filed 02/16/2007 Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 33 (Friday, February 19, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 7539]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-3184]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Area 5 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel (Including the 
States of Iowa, Kansas, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, Oklahoma, and 
Texas)

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Area 5 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be 
conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, 
ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal 
Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Tuesday, March 9, 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Patricia Robb at 1-888-912-1227 or 
414-231-2360.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that a meeting of the Area 5 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be held 
Tuesday, March 9, 2010, at 11 a.m. Central Time via telephone 
conference. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit 
written statements for consideration. Due to limited conference lines, 
notification of intent to participate must be made with Patricia Robb. 
For more information please contact Ms. Robb at 1-888-912-1227 or 414-
231-2360, or write TAP Office Stop 1006MIL, 211 West Wisconsin Avenue, 
Milwaukee, WI 53203-2221, or post comments to the Web site: http://www.improveirs.org.
    The agenda will include various IRS issues.
    Reason for Late Notice: Due to inclement weather and Federal office 
closings in the District of Columbia, key TAP staff was unavailable to 
prepare and submit notice in time to meet the 15-day notice 
requirement. Scheduling conflicts with other meetings prevent 
rescheduling this meeting.

    Dated: February 4, 2010.
Linda Rivera,
Senior Program Analyst, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. 2010-3184 Filed 2-18-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-6112

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

DAMON GERARD DICKERSON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. 

(1:09-cr-00402-CCB-1; 1:12-cv-03484-CCB)

Submitted: June 19, 2014 Decided: June 25, 2014

Before DUNCAN and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Damon Gerard Dickerson, Appellant Pro Se. Judson T. Mihok, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Damon Gerard Dickerson seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) 

motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or 

judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude 

that Dickerson has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, 

we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 
3

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
###### Editorial Note on Part 2

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

#### § 2.500 Scope of subpart.

This subpart prescribes procedures applicable to licensing proceedings which involve the consideration in separate hearings of an application for a license to manufacture nuclear power reactors under subpart F of part 52 of this chapter.

[72 FR 49478, Aug. 28, 2007]