alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 164 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that there should 

be established a National School-Based Health Centers Month to raise 

awareness of health services provided by school health centers. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 16, 2005 

Mr. DAVIS of Illinois submitted the following resolution; which was referred 

to the Committee on Government Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that 

there should be established a National School-Based 

Health Centers Month to raise awareness of health services provided by school health centers. 

Whereas physical and mental health care is of vital importance to ensuring the well-being of the youth in the 

United States; 

Whereas all youth deserve access to comprehensive health 

care, yet youth are less likely than other age groups to 

have medical insurance and have the lowest rate of utilization of health care; 

Whereas health centers are found in more than 1500 schools 

across the United States; 
2 

•HRES 164 IH 

Whereas enrollment rates at school health centers of 65 to 

85 percent are important evidence of overwhelming parental support for these centers; 

Whereas school-based health centers improve the lives of the 

Nation’s youth and their families by offering affordable 

and accessible high-quality health care and health education; 

Whereas high-quality physical and mental health care is necessary for the Nation’s students to attain high levels of 

academic achievement; 

Whereas school-based health centers offer this necessary combination by providing medical care in addition to preventive and mental services; 

Whereas school-based health centers are supported by a diverse range of members of the community, including parents, teachers, school administrators, and other concerned citizens; and 

Whereas school-based health centers serve as a vital link in 

the Nation’s health care network: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that— 

3 (1) there should be established a ‘‘School-Based 

4 Health Center Awareness Month’’ to raise awareness 

5 of the health services provided by schools and the ex6 tent to which these services improve the health and 

7 well-being of the Nation’s youth; and 

8 (2) the President should issue a proclamation 

9 calling on the people of the United States and inter-
3 

•HRES 164 IH 

1 ested organizations to observe such a month with 

2 appropriate programs and activities. 

Æ
December 4 , 2012

U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations M

- 30 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE West Building Ground Floor, Room W12

- 140 Washington, DC 20590

RE: Airworthiness Directive; Brantly International, Inc. Helicopters; Docket No. FAA

- 2012

- 1093

The Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association (AOPA), representing more than 400,000 general
aviation members nationwide

, respectfully request s a 45 day extension to the proposed Brantly helicopters Airworthiness Directive (AD) comment period , set to expire on December 17, 2012.

On October 16, 2012 the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) published a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) for an AD for Brantly I nternational, Inc. Model B

- 2, B

- 2A, and Model B

- 2B
h elicopters with a certain main rotor blade

.

AOPA requests an additional 45 days to the original comment period primarily to accommodate a thorough review of the NPRM by the affected community and second arily to accommodate the holiday schedule

. Due to the timing of the proposed AD, AOPA contends the affected owners and operators of Brantly helicopters would not be able to adequately review the proposal and provide the agency adequate comments.

Additio nally, time is needed to research how and where the agency came up with the estimated replacement costs for an M/R blade due to limited replacement blade inventory and manufacturer support

.

We look forward to an extension of the comment period to allow for thorough communication and opportunity for owners, operators, and the public to comment.

Sincerely,

Rob Hackman Vice President Regulatory Affairs
Aircraft Owners & Pilots Association
SUBPART 43.1 – GENERAL    *(Revised August 10, 2018 through PROCLTR 2018-16)* **Parent topic:** PART 43 – CONTRACT MODIFICATIONS43.102 Policy.    (b)(S-90) *Administrative cost.*The administrative cost for contract modifications issued by DLA Aviation, DLA Contracting Services Office, DLA Disposition Services, DLA Distribution, DLA Energy, DLA Land and Maritime, DLA Strategic Materials, and DLA Troop Support Industrial Hardware is $250. The administrative cost for contract modifications issued by DLA Troop Support Construction and Equipment, Clothing and Textile, Subsistence, and Medical is $750. These fees are in addition to consideration cost (see 43.102(b)(S-91)); and costs for Government reinspection or retest, if necessary.       (S-91) *Consideration cost.*The contracting officer determines the most appropriate calculation method. The formula below is provided as a potential method for calculating consideration for issuing the modification.       Formula: (((((E-1)/(E+1))+1)/100)*M*V) + D       Key: E = # of Extensions: The number of extension request instances that contractor asks for at the time of the modification (i.e., 1 for 1st request, 2 for 2nd request, and 10 for 10th request).       M = Lateness (expressed in months): The number of months the contractor has requested an extension. For example, if the contractor requests an extension of 30 days for the “current” delivery time, M would be 1. For 120 days, M would be 4. If this is the contractor’s second request, and they want another 120 days, M would still be 4.       V = Value of Extended Portion of Contract: The value of the material that is going to be delayed. If the total contract dollar value is for $50K and the whole contract is going to be late, V would be $50K. If the contractor is going to deliver half of the contract on time but needs more time on the other half, then V would be $25K.       D = Direct Cost: Fixed costs associated with writing the modification, re-inspecting material, and any other cost the Government incurs for making the change ($250 as the base).       Examples:       1. Contract is for $1.5M contractor needs a 30 day extension:(((((1-1)/(1+1))+1)/100)*1*1,500,000)+250 = $15,250       2. Same contract, but now they need an additional 90 days:(((((2-1)/(2+1))+1)/100)*3*1,500,000)+250 = $60,250.00       3. Same contract, they have delivered half of their order, but they need 120 days to finish: (((((3-1)/(3+1))+1)/100)*4*750,000)+250 = $45,25043.103 Types of contract modifications.    (b) Unilateral.       (S-90) In cases when the contractor is unable to sign a bilateral modification deobligating an unliquidated obligation (ULO), the contracting officer may issue a unilateral deobligation modification with concurrence of Office of Counsel.
§ 140.21 Licensee guarantees of payment of deferred premiums. Each licensee required to have and maintain financial protection for each nuclear reactor as determined in § 140.11(a)(4) shall at the issuance of the license and annually, on the anniversary of the date on which the indemnity agreement is effective, provide evidence to the Commission that it maintains one of the following types of guarantee of payment of deferred premium in the amount specified in § 140.11(a)(4) for each reactor it is licensed to operate: ( a ) Surety bond,
( b ) Letter of credit,
( c ) Revolving credit/term loan arrangement,
( d ) Maintenance of escrow deposits of government securities,
( e ) Annual certified financial statement showing either that a cash flow (*i.e.*, cash available to a company after all operating expenses, taxes, interest charges, and dividends have been paid) can be generated and would be available for payment of retrospective premiums within three (3) months after submission of the statement, or a cash reserve or a combination of cash flow and cash reserve, or
( f ) Such other type of guarantee as may be approved by the Commission.
[42 FR 50, Jan. 3, 1977, as amended at 71 FR 15012, Mar. 27, 2006; 74 FR 62686, Dec. 1, 2009; 79 FR 38769, July 9, 2014]
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 243 (Monday, December 20, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 79417]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-31860]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

United States Parole Commission

[Public Law 94-409; 5 U.S.C. Sec. 552b]


Record of Vote of Meeting Closure

    I, Isaac Fulwood, of the United States Parole Commission, was 
present at a meeting of said Commission, which started at approximately 
12 p.m., on Tuesday, December 7, 2010, at the U.S. Parole Commission, 
5550 Friendship Boulevard, 4th Floor, Chevy Chase, Maryland 20815. The 
purpose of the meeting was to decide two petitions for reconsideration 
pursuant to 28 CFR Section 2.27. Four Commissioners were present, 
constituting a quorum when the vote to close the meeting was submitted.
    Public announcement further describing the subject matter of the 
meeting and certifications of General Counsel that this meeting may be 
closed by vote of the Commissioners present were submitted to the 
Commissioners prior to the conduct of any other business. Upon motion 
duly made, seconded, and carried, the following Commissioners voted 
that the meeting be closed: Isaac Fulwood, Cranston J. Mitchell and 
Patricia K. Cushwa, J. Patricia Wilson Smoot.
    In witness whereof, I make this official record of the vote taken 
to close this meeting and authorize this record to be made available to 
the public.

    Dated: December 8, 2010.
Isaac Fulwood,
Chairman, U.S. Parole Commission.
[FR Doc. 2010-31860 Filed 12-17-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-01-M
#### SAEGER, Appellant, v. LEHIGH VALLEY R. CO., Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

November 25, 1914.)

Action by Estella M. Saeger, as administratrix. etc., against the Lehigh Valley-Railroad Company.

No opinion. Motion for leave to appeal (from 149 N. Y. Supp. 1109) to the Court of Appeals denied, with $10 costs.
EXHIBIT 32.1CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

       In connection with the quarterly reportof CNB Corporation on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2006 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, W. JenningsDuncan, Interim President and Chief Executive Officer of CNB Corporation,certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:
| 1.     | The  above-listed Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)  or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                 |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                         |
| 2.     | The  information contained in the above-listed Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all  material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the  Company. |
| Date:  August  9, 2006 | /s/W.  Jennings Duncan                                    W. Jennings Duncan  Interim President and Chief Executive Officer |
|----------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 |
akrk_ex1013.htm


    EXHIBIT
10.13

     

    Memorandum
of Understanding

    


    Whereas
Xi'an Haxin Science and Technology Co. Ltd (Hanxin) and Shaanxi Shuta Wook
Products Ltd.(Shuta) has established a friendly cooperation relationship for
long term, and considering the two parties future strategic development plans,
the two parties have reached the following agreements through active
negotiations and arrangements, and are signing this memorandum of understanding
to push forward further cooperation and development of the two
parties:

    


    1. Hanxin
shall continue its endeavor in developing cork products in the next two years,
and shall cooperate with Shuta seamlessly to establish self-owned cork oak tree
plantation to solve the problem of raw materials supply as soon as
practical.

    


    2.  To
achieve the above goal, Hanxin represent that it shall actively complete
purchasing of 7000 acre of land in Linyou County, Baoji, which is now owned by
Shuta, during the following two years, according to its development
situations.

    


    3. Hanxin
also represent that it shall continue to provide to Shuta cork products that can
meet Shuta's demand according to its sales scale, with the most favorable
prices.

    


    4.
Whereas the action of Shuta to complete the purchase of the above mentioned land
was actually an action consigned by Hanxin, which had incurred considerable
expenses to Shuta, Hanxin hereby solemnly commit that it shall complete the
purchase of this land at the price Shuta had paid for the land during the
following two years. Otherwise, Hanxin shall willingly compensate RMB10million
to Shuta for the prior operational expenses.

    


    5. The
two parties sign this memorandum of agreement for mutual
adherence,  to agree upon a good future development, and to fulfill
the both parties' strategic plans to become leading producer and seller of cork
products domestically and abroad.

    


    6. This
memorandum of understanding has two duplicates, either party shall hold one
duplicate, which shall become effective after signing and sealing of the two
parties.

    


    Xi'an
Haxin Science and Technology Co. Ltd

    Legal
Representative: Chen Peng Cheng

    


    


    Shaanxi
Shuta Wook Products Ltd.

    Legal
Representative: Zhang Yi

    


    Oct.
20th,
2009
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 205 (Tuesday, October 23, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 64799]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-26130]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meeting

    The following notice of a scheduled meeting is published pursuant 
to the provisions of the Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-
409, 5 U.S.C. 552b.

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

TIMES AND DATES: The Commission has scheduled a meeting for the 
following date:

October 25, 2012 at 1:00 p.m.

PLACE: Three Lafayette Center, 1155 21st St. NW., Washington, DC, Lobby 
Level Hearing Room (Room 1300).

STATUS: Open.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: The Commission has scheduled this meeting to 
consider various rulemaking matters, including the issuance of proposed 
rules and the approval of final rules. The agenda for this meeting is 
available to the public and posted on the Commission's Web site at 
http://www.cftc.gov. In the event that the time or date of the meeting 
changes, an announcement of the change, along with the new time and 
place of the meeting will be posted on the Commission's Web site.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Sauntia S. Warfield, Assistant 
Secretary of the Commission, 202-418-5084.

Sauntia S. Warfield,
Assistant Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2012-26130 Filed 10-19-12; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
```
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 238 (Monday, December 13, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 77613]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-31397]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

BROADCASTING BOARD OF GOVERNORS


 Sunshine Act Meeting Notice

DATE AND TIME:  Friday, December 17, 2010, 11 a.m.

PLACE:  Cohen Building, Room 3321, 330 Independence Ave., SW., 
Washington, DC 20237.

SUBJECT:  Notice of Meeting of the Broadcasting Board of Governors.
SUMMARY: The Broadcasting Board of Governors (BBG) will be meeting at 
the time and location listed above. The BBG will hear a Middle East 
trip report, a report from the Board's Budget and Strategy Committee, 
and a report from the Chairman of the International Broadcasting Bureau 
Coordinating Committee on distribution/technology. The meeting is open 
to public observation via streamed Web cast, both live and on-demand, 
on the BBG's public Web site at http://www.bbg.gov.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Persons interested in obtaining 
more information should contact Paul Kollmer-Dorsey at (202) 203-4545.

Paul Kollmer-Dorsey,
Deputy General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2010-31397 Filed 12-9-10; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 8610-01-P
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 202 (Thursday, October 18, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 64146]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-25612]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES

Arts and Artifacts Indemnity Panel Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Federal Council on the Arts and the Humanities, National 
Endowment for the Humanities.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given that the Federal Council on 
the Arts and the Humanities will hold a meeting of the Arts and 
Artifacts International Indemnity Panel. The purpose of the meeting is 
for panel review, discussion, evaluation, and recommendation of 
applications for Certificates of Indemnity submitted to the Federal 
Council on the Arts and the Humanities for exhibitions beginning after 
January 1, 2013.

DATES: The meeting will be held on Tuesday, November 13, 2012, from 
9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Old Post Office Building, 
1100 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20506, in Room 730.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lisette Voyatzis, Committee Management 
Officer, 1100 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Room 529, Washington, DC 20506, 
or call (202) 606-8322. Hearing-impaired individuals are advised that 
information on this matter may be obtained by contacting the National 
Endowment for the Humanities' TDD terminal at (202) 606-8282.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Because the meeting will consider 
proprietary financial and commercial data provided in confidence by 
indemnity applicants, and material that is likely to disclose trade 
secrets or other privileged or confidential information, and because it 
is important to keep the values of objects to be indemnified and the 
methods of transportation and security measures confidential, the 
meeting will be closed to the public pursuant to section 552b(c)(4) of 
Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. I have made this determination under the 
authority granted me by the Chairman's Delegation of Authority to Close 
Advisory Committee Meetings dated July 19, 1993.

    Dated: October 11, 2012.
Lisette Voyatzis,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2012-25612 Filed 10-17-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7536-01-P
```
ex10-31a.htm










Supplemental Agreement No. 19





to





Purchase Agreement No. 1980





between





The Boeing Company





and





AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC





Relating to Boeing Model 777-223IGW Aircraft









THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT, entered into as of _________________________, 2009, (Supplemental Agreement Number 19) by and between THE BOEING COMPANY, a Delaware corporation with offices in Seattle, Washington, (Boeing) and American Airlines, Inc. (Customer);





RECITALS:





1.           Boeing and Customer entered into Purchase Agreement No. 1980 dated as of October 31, 1997, as amended and supplemented (capitalized terms used herein without definition shall have the meanings specified therefor in such Purchase Agreement) relating to Boeing Model 777-223IGW
aircraft (the Purchase Agreement).





2.           In Letter Agreement No. 6-1162-AKP-109R1 to the Purchase Agreement, among other things, Boeing agreed to issue [CONFIDENTIAL PORTION OMITTED AND FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE COMMISSION PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT].  Boeing and Customer now wish
to amend such letter agreement to set forth [CONFIDENTIAL PORTION OMITTED AND FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE COMMISSION PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT].






P.A. No. 1980                                                           SA-19





BOEING PROPRIETARY






  



  







  









In consideration of the mutual covenants herein contained, the parties agree to amend the Purchase Agreement as follows:





1.           The Table of Contents of the Purchase Agreement is deleted in its entirety and replaced by a revised Table of Contents, copy attached, to set forth Letter Agreement No. 6-1162-AKP-109R2 entitled Business Considerations and the appropriate SA-19 references.





2.           Letter Agreement No. 6-1162-AKP-109R1 entitled Business Considerations is deleted in its entirety and is replaced by revised letter agreement 6-1162-AKP-109R2, copy attached, to set forth [CONFIDENTIAL PORTION OMITTED AND FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE COMMISSION PURSUANT TO A
REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT] due to Customer under Letter Agreement 6-1162-AKP-109R2).





The Purchase Agreement will be deemed to be amended to the extent provided herein and as so amended will continue in full force and effect.  In the event of any inconsistency between the above provisions and the provisions contained in the referenced exhibits to this Supplemental Agreement, the terms of the exhibits will control.





EXECUTED IN DUPLICATE as of the day and year first above written.





THE BOEING COMPANY                                                                           AMERICAN
AIRLINES, INC.













By:                                                                    By:                                             









Its:    Attorney-In-Fact                                                                    Its:                                              






P.A. No. 1980                                                           SA-19





BOEING PROPRIETARY
1239.000 Scope of part.

In addition to FAR 39.000, this part prescribes acquisition policies and procedures for use in

acquiring information technology and information technology-related supplies, services and systems,

including information security, to include—

(a) Software management and development;

(b) Section 508 standards and compliance for contracts;

(c) Information security and incident response reporting;

(d) Protection of data about individuals;

(e) Cloud computing;

(f) Technology modernization and upgrade/refreshment; and

(g) Record management.

Parent topic: PART 1239—ACQUISITION OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY