alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
PGI 208.7003-1 Assignments under integrated materiel management (IMM).       (b) When an item assigned for IMM is to be acquired by the requiring activity under DFARS 208.7003-1(a)(3), the contracting officer must—          (i) Document the contract file with a statement of the specific advantage of local purchase for an acquisition exceeding the micro-purchase threshold in FAR Part 2; and          (ii) Ensure that a waiver is obtained from the IMM manager before initiating an acquisition exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold in FAR Part 2, if the IMM assignment is to the General Services Administration (GSA), the Defense Logistics Agency (DLA), or the Army Materiel Command (AMC). Submit requests for waiver—          (A) For GSA, to: Commissioner (F)          Federal Supply Service          Washington, DC 20406          (B) For DLA, to: DLA Land and Maritime          ATTN: DSCC-BDL          P.O. Box 3990          Columbus, OH 43216-5000          DLA Energy          ATTN: DESC-CPA          8725 John J. Kingman Road          Fort Belvoir, VA 22060-6222          DLA Aviation          ATTN: DSCR-BA          8000 Jefferson Davis Highway          Richmond, VA 23297-5000          DLA Troop Support          ATTN: DSCP-ILSI (for General and Industrial)										 DSCP-OCS (for Medical, Clothing, and Textiles)          700 Robbins Avenue, Bldg. 4          Philadelphia, PA 19111-5096          (iii) In addition, forward a copy of each request to:          Defense Logistics Agency          Logistics Operations          ATTN: J-335          8725 John J. Kingman Road          Fort Belvoir, VA 22060-6221          For AMC:		HQ, Army Materiel Command          ATTN: AMCLG-SL          4400 Martin Road          Redstone Arsenal, AL 35898    **Parent topic:** PGI 208.7003 Applicability.
PGI 213.301 Governmentwide commercial

purchase card.

(1) A Governmentwide commercial purchase card program is a program that is authorized pursuant

to a delegation of contracting authority and designation as a DoD contracting activity for the

purpose of streamlining the purchase and payment processes for supplies and services by use of a

Government-issued purchase card.

(2) Governmentwide commercial purchase card programs cannot be established or operated unless

contracting authority is granted in accordance with governing laws and regulations, and delegated

through a contracting activity identified at 202.101 . Further guidance regarding establishment,

operation, and oversight of Governmentwide commercial purchase card programs can be found in

the “Department of Defense Government Charge Card Guidebook for Establishing and Managing

Purchase, Travel, and Fuel Card Programs” at

https://www.acq.osd.mil/asda/dpc/ce/pc/docs-guides.html .

Parent topic: PGI 213.3 -SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION METHODS
IV 

House Calendar No. 21

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 211

[Report No. 109–43] 

Providing for consideration of the bill (S. 256) to amend title 11 of the 

United States Code, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 13, 2005

Mr. GINGREY, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; 

which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the bill (S. 256) to amend 

title 11 of the United States Code, and for other purposes.

1 Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution 

2 it shall be in order to consider in the House the bill (S. 

3 256) to amend title 11 of the United States Code, and 

4 for other purposes. All points of order against the bill and 

5 against its consideration are waived. The bill shall be con6 sidered as read. The previous question shall be considered 

7 as ordered on the bill to final passage without intervening 

8 motion except: (1) one hour of debate on the bill equally 
2 

HRES 211 RH 

1 divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking mi2 nority member of the Committee on the Judiciary; and 

3 (2) one motion to recommit. 

House Calendar No. 21

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 211

[Report No. 109–43] 

RESOLUTION

Providing for consideration of the bill (S. 256) to 

for other purposes. amend title 11 of the United States Code, and 

APRIL 13, 2005

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed
Return to Home Page

Return to Table of Contents

HISTORY AND ROLE OF THE JOINT COMMITTEE

IN THE LEGISLATIVE PROCESS

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Introduction

I. Statutory Basis for the Joint Committee on Taxation

II. How the Joint Committee Fulfills its Statutory Mandate

III. Joint Committee Role in the Tax Legislative Process

IV. Joint Committee Revenue Estimation Process

V. Joint Committee Statutory Refund Review

VI. Other Services of the Joint Committee

VII. Educational and Career Background of the Joint Committee Professional Staff

Bibliography

Joint Committee on Taxation History - Table of Contents Page 1 of 1

http://permanent.access.gpo.gov/lps78154/tablhist.html 07/22/11
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           7,078
<SECURITIES>                                       752
<RECEIVABLES>                                    9,358
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     12,164
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                31,969
<PP&E>                                           8,755
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  41,299
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           22,236
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             7
<OTHER-SE>                                      13,677
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    41,299
<SALES>                                          5,982
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,982
<CGS>                                            4,147
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,147
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,989
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 (308)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (305)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    443
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                368
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       368
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.05


</TABLE>
Exhibit 33.2



|     |  |  |                      | 
|---- |  |  | -------------------- | 
|LOGO |  |  |                      | 
|     |  |  | 1 Mortgage Way      
|     |  |  | Mt. Laurel, NJ 08054





REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH REGULATION AB

SERVICING CRITERIA

PHH Mortgage
Corporation (the Asserting Party) is responsible for assessing compliance as of December 31, 2016 and for the period from January 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016 (the Reporting Period) with the servicing
criteria set forth in Section 229.1122(d) of the Code of Federal Regulations (the CFR), except for criteria set forth in Section 229.1122(d)(3)(i)(c), (d)(4)(xv) and (d)(1)(iii) of the CFR, which the Asserting Party has
concluded are not applicable to the servicing activities it performs with respect to the transactions covered by this report (the Applicable Servicing Criteria). The criteria set forth in Section 229.1122 (d)(2)(i), (d)(2)(ii),
(d)(4)(iv), (d)(4)(vii), (d)(4)(viii) and (d)(4)(xi) of the CFR are performed by outsource providers on behalf of the Asserting Party; however, the Asserting Party has monitored the outsourcing of these criteria and assumes responsibility for
compliance. The transactions covered by this report include all non-agency loan sale agreements executed after January 1, 2006 as well as all re-securitization transactions after January 1, 2006 for which the Asserting Party served as
servicer (the Platform).

The Asserting Party has assessed its compliance with the Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2016 and for the
Reporting Period and has concluded that the Asserting Party has complied, in all material respects, with the Applicable Servicing Criteria with respect to the Platform taken as a whole.

Deloitte & Touche, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on the assessment of compliance with the
Servicing Criteria for the Reporting Period as set forth in this assertion.

PHH Mortgage Corporation

Date: March 1, 2017



|                   
|-------------------
|/s/ Glen A. Messina
|Glen A. Messina    
|President          



|                                      
|--------------------------------------
|/s/ Martin L. Foster                  
|Martin L. Foster                      
|Senior Vice President  Loan Servicing
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsBOREAS TE-2 Foliage Respiration DataThe BOREAS TE-2 team collected several data sets in support of its efforts to characterize and interpret information on the respiration of the foliage, roots, and wood of boreal vegetation. This data set contains measurements of foliar respiration conducted in the NSA during the growing season of 1994. The data are stored in tabular ASCII files. The data files are available on a CD-ROM (see document number 20010000884), or from the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) Distributed Active Archive Center (DAAC).Document ID20010004249Acquisition SourceGoddard Space Flight CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsRyan, Michael G.*(Forest Service Fort Collins, CO United States)*Hall, Forrest G.*(NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt, MD United States)*Lavigne, Michael*(Forestry Canada Fredericton, New Brunswick Canada)*Papagno, Andrea*(Raytheon Information Technology and Scientific Services Greenbelt, MD United States)*Date AcquiredSeptember 7, 2013Publication DateOctober 1, 2000Subject CategoryEarth Resources And Remote SensingReport/Patent NumberNASA/TM-2000-209891/VOL131Rept-2000-03136-0/VOL131NAS 1.15:209891/VOL131Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 462-33-01Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20010004249.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
#### § 39.47 Radioactive markers.

The licensee may use radioactive markers in wells only if the individual markers contain quantities of licensed material not exceeding the quantities specified in § 30.71 of this chapter. The use of markers is subject only to the requirements of § 39.37.
#### § 429.38 Non-class A external power supplies. [Reserved]
PGI 225.7302 Preparation of Letter of Offer and Acceptance.       (2) The contracting officer shall—          (i) Assist the DoD implementing agency, as necessary, in preparation of the Letter of Offer and Acceptance;          (ii) Identify and explain all unusual contractual requirements or requests for deviations; and          (iii) Assist in preparing the price and availability data.    **Parent topic:** PGI 225.73 -ACQUISITIONS FOR FOREIGN MILITARY SALES
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

________________ _____________
No. 1D18-3998

________________ _____________
M ARK A. M ERRILL , Petitioner,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA ; M ARK S. I NCH , Florida Department of Corrections,

Respondents.

________________ _____________

Petition for Belated Appe al—Original Jurisdiction.

March 18, 2019

P ER C URIAM

. Because this amended petition seeks belated appeal of a lower tribunal order in a civil matter, the amended petition is denied. See Powell v. Fla. Dep’t of Corrections , 727 So. 2d 1103 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999) (stating that because the proceedings below were civil in nature, the provisions of Flor ida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(c) are not applicable ). Petitioner may seek relief in the lower tribunal by a motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.540. See Welch v. Department of Corrections
, 238 So. 3d 1281 (Fla. 1st DCA 2018).2 B ILBREY , W INOKUR , and J AY , JJ., concur.

________________ _____________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fl a. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

________________ _____________

Mark A. Merrill, pro se, Petitioner.

Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, and Daniel Krumbholz, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondents.
§ 1703.109 Procedure for appeal of denial of requests for board records and denial of requests for fee waiver or reduction. ( a ) ( 1 ) A person whose request for access to records in whole or in part may appeal that determination to the General Counsel within 90 days of the determination. A person denied a fee waiver or reduction may appeal that determination to the General Counsel within 30 days. The person may also seek assistance from the FOIA Public Liaison of the agency. Appeals filed pursuant to this section must be in writing, directed to the General Counsel at the address indicated in § 1703.105(b)(2), and clearly marked “Freedom of Information Act Appeal.” Such an appeal received by the Board not addressed and marked as indicated in this paragraph will be so addressed and marked by Board personnel as soon as it is properly identified and then will be forwarded to the General Counsel.
( 2 ) The General Counsel shall make a determination with respect to any appeal within 20 working days after the receipt of such appeal. If, on appeal, the denial of the request for records or fee reduction is in whole or in part upheld, the General Counsel shall notify the person making such request of the provisions for judicial review of that determination.
( 3 ) The requestor may request that the FOIA Public Liaison refer the denial to be reviewed through dispute resolution services or may request the Office of Government Information Services within the National Archives and Records Administration to review the denial.
( b ) In unusual circumstances, as defined in § 1703.108(c), the time limits prescribed for deciding an appeal pursuant to this section may be extended by up to ten working days, by the General Counsel, who will send written notice to the requester setting forth the reasons for such extension and the expected determination date.
[56 FR 21261, May 8, 1991, as amended at 82 FR 30723, July 3, 2017]
# STATEOFLOUISIANA

COURTOFAPPEAL,FIRSTCIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS RICHARD ANDERSON NO. 

### 2022 Kw 0181 

### MARCH 28, 2022 In Re: Richard Anderson, 

### applying for 

### supervisory writs, 19th Judicial District 

### Court, Parish of East Baton Rouge, No. 

### 08- 10-0824. BEFORE: MCDONALD, LANIER, AND WOLFE, JJ.



### WRIT DENIED AS MOOT. 

### The record of the Clerk of Court of East Baton Rouge Parish reflects the 

### district court 

### denied relator' s Motion for Reconsideration of Sentence on October 

### 17, 

### 2016. JMbi WIL EW

URT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT 

# L; DEPUTY CtERK OF COURT

FOR THE COURT
#### In re MILLER.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

June 12, 1914.)

In the matter of the disposition of the real property of Christian H. Miller.

No opinion. Order of the Surrogate’s Court of Kings County affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.
415.606 Agency procedures.

HCAs are responsible for establishing the procedures for control of unsolicited proposals required

by FAR 15.606(a) and for identifying the contact points as required by FAR 15.606(b).

Parent topic: Subpart 415.6 - Unsolicited Proposals
§ 490.201 Alternative fueled vehicle acquisition mandate schedule. ( a ) Except as otherwise provided in this part, of the new light duty motor vehicles acquired annually for State government fleets, including agencies thereof but excluding municipal fleets, the following percentages shall be alternative fueled vehicles for the following model years; ( 1 ) 10 percent for model year 1997;
( 2 ) 15 percent for model year 1998;
( 3 ) 25 percent for model year 1999;
( 4 ) 50 percent for model year 2000; and
( 5 ) 75 percent for model year 2001 and thereafter.
( b ) Each State shall calculate its alternative fueled vehicle acquisition requirements for the State government fleets, including agencies thereof, by applying the alternative fueled vehicle acquisition percentages for each model year to the total number of new light duty motor vehicles to be acquired during that model year for those fleets.
( c ) If the calculation performed under paragraph (b) of this section produces a number that requires the acquisition of a partial vehicle, an adjustment to the acquisition number will be made by rounding the number of vehicles down the next whole number if the fraction is less than one half and by rounding the number of vehicles up to the next whole number if the fraction is equal to or greater than one half.
( d ) A State fleet that first becomes subject to this part after model year 1997 shall acquire alternative fueled vehicles in the next model year at the percentage applicable to that model year according to the schedule in paragraph (a) of this section, unless the State is granted an exemption or reduction of the acquisition percentage pursuant to the procedures and criteria in section 490.204.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report of ImClone
Systems Incorporated (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31,
2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Daniel S. Lynch, Senior Vice President, Chief Administrative
Officer and Acting Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

/s/ DANIEL S. LYNCH
------------------------------
Daniel S. Lynch
Acting Chief Executive Officer
June 23, 2003
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         199,359
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,288
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               511,612
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,362,012
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,119
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       87,477,847
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,362,012
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                23,354
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  101,658
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                58,081
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (136,385)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (136,385)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (136,385)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.01)


</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Eugene Olker, Appellant. Philip Ross, as Industrial Commissioner, Respondent.

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed April 29, 1980, disqualifying claimant from unemployment insurance benefits for misconduct. The claimant was employed as a taxi driver for about 10 months. On December 19, 1979 the claimant arrived at his place of employment at 5:00 a.m. and was told by the dispatcher that on the previous day he had booked $10 below the average of all drivers. The claimant told the dispatcher that if he did not like what he was doing why didn’t he fire him. The dispatcher, who was not previously intending to do so, thereupon discharged the claimant and took back his keys and trip card. There is no substantial evidence to support a determination that the claimant voluntarily left his employment without good cause by provoking his discharge *(Matter of Senator [Ross],*76 AD2d 652). In these circumstances, a finding that the claimant should have realized that his conduct would probably provoke his discharge is unwarranted *(Matter of Raven [Levine],*40 AD2d 128). The decision should be reversed and the matter remitted for further proceedings. Decision reversed, with costs, and matter remitted to the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board for further proceedings not inconsistent herewith. Mahoney, P. J., Kane, Main, Mikoll and Casey, JJ., concur.
#### People of the State of Illinois ex rel. Edward J. Barrett, Appellee, v. Depositors State Bank. Helen Schymanski, Appellant, v. Charles H. Albers.

Gen. No. 40,232.

opinion filed June 26, 1940.

Laurence B. Jacobs, for appellant; Mareellus W. Meek and Roy S. Gaskill, of counsel; Altheimer, Woods & Smith, for appellee; Lewis L. Levin and Charles H. Blumenfeld, of counsel.

Opinion by

Justice John J. Sullivan.

‘ ‘Not to be published in full.”
# PGI Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation

- PGI Part 234 - MAJOR SYSTEMACQUISITION 
- PGI Part 235 - RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CONTRACTING 
- PGI Part 236 - CONSTRUCTIONAND ARCHITECT — ENGINEER CONTRACTS 
- PGI Part 237 - SERVICE CONTRACTING 
- PGI Part 239 - ACQUISITION OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 
- PGI Part 241 - ACQUISITIONOF UTILITY SERVICES 

**Parent topic:**PGI Subchapter F - SPECIAL CATEGORIES OF CONTRACTING