alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. George Ryerson, Appellant.

In a *coram nobis*proceeding, defendant appeals from an order of the County Court, Nassau County, dated December 31, 1968, which denied the application. Order affirmed, with leave to renew the application upon proper supporting papers *(People*v. *Scott,*10 N Y 2d 380; *People*v. *Garvin,*28 A D 2d 1145). Christ, Acting P. J., Benjamin, Munder, Martuseello and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.
PGI Part 210 - MARKET RESEARCH

PGI 210.002 Procedures.

PGI 210.070 Market research report guide for improving the tradecraft in services acquisition.

Parent topic: PGI Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation

PGI 210.002 Procedures.

(e)(ii) Contracting officers are encouraged to retain information on potential offerors that express an

interest in an acquisition, in order to solicit feedback in instances when only one offer is received on

a competitive solicitation (see PGI 215.371-2 ).

(iii) Contracting officers should ensure that the contract file includes—

(A) The methods used to conduct market research;

(B) The timeframe in which market research was conducted;

(C) The analysis of the capabilities of the potential sources that were identified during market

research; and

(D) Any conclusion(s) reached as a result of market research analysis.

PGI 210.070 Market research report guide for improving the

tradecraft in services acquisition.

The “Market Research Report Guide for Improving the Tradecraft in Services Acquisition” is

designed to effect the collection and sharing of standardized market research information across the

Department. The guide is available for download at

https://www.acq.osd.mil/asda/dpc/cp/policy/docs/sa/2017_Market_Research_Guide_(Final).pdf.
PGI PART 3 IMPROPER BUSINESS

PRACTICES AND PERSONAL CONFLICTS OF

INTEREST

PGI SUBPART 3.1 – SAFEGUARDS

PGI 3.104-4 Statutory and related prohibitions, restrictions, and requirements.

PGI SUBPART 3.1 – SAFEGUARDS

PGI 3.104-4 Statutory and related prohibitions, restrictions, and

requirements.

(a) Contractor and Agency personnel that require NDAs due to their assigned activities will provide

copies of their NDA to the contracting officer. This copy will become part of the contract.

(b) Contractor and Agency personnel that frequently participate in activities that require access to

source selection information, CUI, or any other protected information should sign a blanket NDA at

the beginning of the fiscal year that is in effect for that year. These personnel will provide a copy of

their blanket NDA to each contracting officer that requires their participation/expertise throughout

the fiscal year. The contracting officer will sign the copy and keep for the contract file.
###### Editorial Note on Part 2

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

#### § 2.406 Finality of decisions on separate issues.

Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter, in a proceeding conducted pursuant to this subpart and appendices N of parts 50 or 52 of this chapter, no matter which has been reserved for consideration in one phase of the hearing shall be considered at another phase of the hearing except on the basis of significant new information that substantially affects the conclusion(s) reached at the other phase or other good cause.
905.502 Authority.       (a) *Newspapers.* When it is deemed necessary to use paid advertisements in newspapers and trade journals, written authority for such publication shall be obtained from the Head of the Contracting Activity or designee.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 905.5 - Paid Advertisements
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I,
Jennifer M. Davis, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect
of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2013-1 (the Exchange Act periodic reports);

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance
statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this
report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Deutsche
Bank Trust Company Americas.



By:

/s/ Jennifer M. DavisName:

Jennifer M. DavisTitle:

Deputy Chief Financial OfficerDate:

August 19, 2016
#### Joseph Milone et al., Respondents, v Lawrence Jacobson Appeal al., Appellants.

Appeal by defendants, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated October 10, 1979, as denied their motion to dismiss the complaint as to the second through fifth causes of action, for failure to state a cause of action. Order reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, without costs or disbursements, the second and third causes of action are dismissed for failure to state a cause of action and the fourth and fifth causes of action are dismissed on consent. The complaint alleged that the corporate plaintiff, as general contractor for the construction of a racetrack in Suffolk County, had received and forwarded to the racetrack owners a bid of $234,850 from the corporate defendant for the construction of the racetrack’s grandstand. It then alleged that defendant Jacobson, as an officer and employee of the corporate defendant, had subsequently advised certain employees of the racetrack owners that the corporate defendant’s bid had actually been $138,000, but had been inflated by $96,000 at the request of the individual plaintiffs for their own benefit and that of the corporate plaintiff. Furthermore, it was alleged that Jacob*549son’s statements, having been made to obtain more business for the corporate defendant, did, in fact, succeed in securing for the corporate defendant over $400,000 in additional contract awards from the racetrack owners. Finally, the instant complaint alleged that Jacobson had repeated his charges against the individual plaintiffs to the Suffolk County District Attorney, and under oath, to a Suffolk County, as well as a Federal, Grand Jury, and later as a witness at plaintiffs’ trial on State criminal charges, which resulted in plaintiffs’ acquittal. Special Term erred in not dismissing the second cause of action. Although it is defamation that is actually alleged, this cause of action is labeled a prima facie tort to avoid the one-year Statute of Limitations for defamation (CPLR 215, subd 3). The practice of redefining a cause of action to avoid the applicable Statute of Limitations was specifically condemned in *Morrison v National Broadcasting Co.*(19 NY2d 453, 459). Special Term also erred in not dismissing the third cause of action, alleging perjury and injury resulting from false statements. Any statements made by Jacobson more than one year before the commencement of this action cannot serve as the basis for a timely action (CPLR 215, subd 3; *Clark v New York Tel. Co.,*52 AD2d 1030, affd 41 NY2d 1069). Moreover, any statements made during plaintiffs’ criminal trial enjoy an absolute immunity (see *Toker v Poliak,*44 NY2d 211, 219). Hopkins, J. P., Mangano, O’Connor and Weinstein, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
  I, Leslie J. Kessler, Chief Executive Officer of PureSafe Water Systems, Inc. (the “Registrant”), hereby certify that the Form 10-Q of PureSafe Water Systems, Inc. for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2009 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
 
 Date:  May 24, 2010
/s/ Leslie J. KesslerLeslie J. KesslerPresident and Chief Executive Officer
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

 v. ) CR. NO. 2:06cr193-MEF

) 

JOSHUA HESTER )

O R D E R

Upon consideration of the motion for writ of habeas corpus ad prosequendum filed

November 13, 2006, and for good cause shown, it is

ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED. The Clerk of this Court is hereby

DIRECTED to issue a WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS AD PROSEQUENDUM addressed to

Elmore County Jail, Wetumpka, Alabama, commanding them to deliver Joshua Hester, to any

United States Marshal or Deputy United States Marshal, and directing said Marshal or

Deputy to bring said prisoner before this court, to be held at Montgomery, Alabama, on

November 20, 2006, at 2:00 p.m., and to return the prisoner to said official when the court

shall have finished with him.

Done this 15th day of November, 2006.

 /s/Charles S. Coody 

CHARLES S. COODY

CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:06-cr-00193-MEF-CSC Document 36 Filed 11/15/2006 Page 1 of 1
Specimen Stock Certificate



 Exhibit 4.2 

 

 

  
 Exhibit 4.2

 SPECIMEN 
 COMMON STOCK COMMON STOCK 
 NUMBER SHARES

 CSR 0000 Coinstar 
 INCORPORATED UNDER THE CUSIP 19259P 30 0 
 LAWS OF
THE STATE OF DELAWARE 
 SEE REVERSE FOR CERTAIN DEFINITIONS 
 This Certifies that 
 is the record holder of 
 FULLY PAID AND
NONASSESSABLE SHARES OF COMMON STOCK, $0.001 PAR VALUE, OF 
 COINSTAR, INC. 
 transferable on the books of the Corporation in person or duly authorized attorney on surrender of this certificate property
endorsed. This certificate shall not be valid countersigned and registered by the Transfer Agent and Registrar. 
 WITNESS the facsimile seal of the Corporation and the signature of its duly authorized officers. 
 COINSTAR, INC. 
 INCORPORATED 
 OCTOBER 12, 1993 
 DELAWARE 
 Dated: 
 SECRETARY CHAIR OF THE BOARD 
 COUNTERSIGNED AND REGISTERED: 
 MELLON INVESTOR
SERVICES LLC 
 TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTRAR 
 BY 
 AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE 
 ©NORTHERN BANK NOTE COMPANY 








 

 

  
 COINSTAR, INC.

 THE CORPORATION WILL FURNISH WITHOUT CHARGE TO EACH STOCKHOLDER WHO SO REQUESTS A STATEMENT OF THE POWERS,
DESIGNATIONS, PREFERENCES AND RELATIVE, PARTICIPATING, OPTIONAL, OR OTHER SPECIAL RIGHTS OF EACH CLASS OF STOCK OR SERIES THEREOF OF THE CORPORATION, AND THE QUALIFICATIONS, LIMITATIONS OR RESTRICTIONS OF SUCH PREFERENCES AND/OR RIGHTS. SUCH
REQUESTS MAY BE MADE TO THE CORPORATION OR THE TRANSFER AGENT. 
 The following abbreviations, when used in the
inscription on the face of this certificate, shall be construed as though they were written out in full according to applicable laws or regulations: 
 TEN COM- as tenants in common 
 TEN ENT- as tenants
by the entireties 
 JTTEN- as joint tenants with right of survivorship and not as tenants in common 

COM PROP- as community property 
 UNIF GIFT MIN ACT- Custodian 
 (Cust) (Minor)

 under Uniform Gifts to Minors 
 Act 
 (State) 
 UNIFTRF MIN ACT- 
 Custodian (until age) 
 (Cust) 
 under Uniform Transfers 
 (Minor) 
 to Minors Act 
 (State) 
 Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list. 
 For Value
Received, 
 hereby sell, assign and transfer unto 
 PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE 
 (PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS, INCLUDING ZIP CODE, OF ASSIGNEE) 
 Shares 
 of the capital stock represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint 
 Attorney to 
 transfer the-said stock on-the books of the within-named Corporation with
full power of substitution in the premises. 
 Dated, 
 NOTICE: THE SIGNATURE TO THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE, IN EVERY
PARTICULAR, WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT OR ANY CHANGE WHATSOEVER. 
 SIGNATURE GUARANTEED: 
 THE SIGNATURE(S) MUST BE GUARANTEED BY AN ELIGIBLE GUARANTOR INSTITUTION, (BANKS, STOCKBROKERS, SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATIONS
AND CREDIT UNIONS WITH MEMBERSHIP IN AN APPROVED SIGNATURE GUARANTEE MEDALLION PROGRAM) PURSUANT TO S.E.C. RULE 17Ad-15.
Subpart 2415.2 - Solicitation and Receipt of

Proposals and Quotations

Parent topic: PART 2415 - CONTRACTING BY NEGOTIATION

2415.203 Requests for proposals.

(a)(3) The contracting officer may limit the size of the technical and management portion of offers

submitted in response to a request for proposals when the contracting officer determines that it is in

the Government's best interest to do so.

2415.204 Contract format.

(e) The HCA shall be responsible for making exemptions pursuant to FAR 15.204(e).

2415.209 Solicitation provisions and contract clauses.

(a)

(1) The Contracting Officer shall insert a provision substantially the same as the provision at

2452.215-70, Proposal Content, in all solicitations for negotiated procurements expected to exceed

the simplified acquisition limit. The provision may be used in simplified acquisitions when it is

necessary to obtain business proposal information in making the award selection. If the proposed

contract requires work on, or access to, HUD systems or applications (see the clause at

2452.239-70), the provision shall be used with its Alternate I. When the Contracting Officer has

determined that it is necessary to limit the size of the technical and management portion of offers

submitted by offerors, the provision shall be used with its Alternate II.

(2) The contracting officer shall insert the provision at 2452.215-71, Relative Importance of

Technical Evaluation Factors to Cost or Price, in solicitations for contracts to be awarded using the

tradeoff selection process (see FAR 15.101-1) expected to exceed the simplified acquisition limit.
§ 490.707 Increasing the qualifying volume of the biodiesel component. DOE may increase the qualifying volume of the biodiesel component of fuel for purposes of allocation of credits under this subpart only after it: ( a ) Collects data establishing that the average annual alternative fuel use in light duty vehicles by fleets and covered persons exceeds 450 gallons or gallon equivalents; and
( b ) Conducts a rulemaking to amend the provisions of this subpart to change the qualifying volume to the average annual alternative fuel use.
2905.503 Procedures.       (a) Prior to obtaining HCA approval, an agency should seek legal review to determine whether it has appropriate legal authority for advertising. The HCA exercising the authority delegated by 2905.502 must do so in accordance with the procedures set forth in FAR 5.503 and those in this section.          (b) Requests for procurement of advertising must be accompanied by written authority to advertise or publish which sets forth justification and includes the names of newspapers or journals concerned, frequency and dates of proposed advertisements, estimated cost, and other pertinent information.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 2905.5 - Paid Advertisements
#### Joseph Cacciatore, Appellant, v. Raymond Rovello and Mary Rovello, Appellees.

Gen. No. 41,168.

*265opinion filed June 19, 1940.

Taylor, Cuttone, Partridge & Parker, for appellant; Ode L. Rankin, of counsel; no appearance for appellees.

Opinion by

Justice Burke.

“Not to be published in full.”
###### Editorial Note on Part 1045

#### Editorial Notes:Nomenclature changes to part 1045 appear at 88 FR 41294, June 26, 2023, and 88 FR 82238, Nov. 24, 2023.

§ 1045.60 Does an unauthorized public release of RD, FRD, or TFNI result in its declassification?

Editorial Notes:

Nomenclature changes to part 1045 appear at 88 FR 41294, June 26, 2023, and 88 FR 82238, Nov. 24, 2023.

The unauthorized disclosure of RD, FRD, or TFNI does not automatically result in its declassification. However, if a disclosure is sufficiently authoritative or credible, the Director, Office of Environment, Health, Safety and Security will examine the possibility of declassifying the information.

[83 FR 66007, Dec. 21, 2018, as amended at 88 FR 41294, June 26, 2023]
IN THE UNITED STATES FEDERAL DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, *

Plaintiff, *

 *

vs. * CR. NO. 1:06-cr-170 WHA

 *

ROY DALE WALLACE *

Defendants. *

MOTION TO CONTINUE TRIAL

COMES, James R. Cooper, Jr. who on behalf of his client Roy Wallace, does move this

Court to continue the trial of Mr. Wallace from February 5, 2007, to a later date and states in

support as follows: 

1. Mr. Wallace has met with the government three times. He is providing certain

information that is of great value to the government. He will be meeting with the

government additional times. Counsel for Mr. Wallace and Ms. Clark Morris, who

represents the government, has been actively pursuing a plea agreement.

2. The parties have agreed on a total plea agreement but for one issue. That issue

requires the imput of DEA agent Devon Whittle. Without his imput, there can be

no plea agreement at this time.

3. Unfortunately, Mr. Whittle’s mother who lives in Phoenix, Arizona, has become

very, very ill. Mr. Whittle has with her for the past two weeks. He is going to be

with her for what is anticipated to be another week or ten days. While he is with

her, he is unable to participate with the government and counsel for Mr. Wallace

in plea negotiations. All parties understand that taking care of his mother at this

point is much more important. 

4. Mr. Cooper counsel for Mr. Wallace and Ms. Morris, counsel for the government

will be able to agree on a plea once Mr. Whittle is back in Montgomery. Until

then, they cannot arrive at a plea.

5. If the Court would continue the Trial, from its present February trial date, the

parties would almost certainly be able to arrive at a plea agreement, obviating the

need for a trial, once Mr. Whittle is back in town.

6. Mr. Cooper and Ms. Morris have discussed this matter. Ms. Morris does not

Case 1:06-cr-00170-WHA-CSC Document 335 Filed 01/18/2007 Page 1 of 2
object to a continuance. The ends of justice would best be served by continuing

this case and allowing the parties to complete their plea negotiations. 

Wherefore the defendant requests the following relief:

1. That this case and all applicable plea deadlines be continued until a later date.

2. All other appropriate relief.

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,

 s/ James R. Cooper, Jr.

James R. Cooper, Jr. (COO021)

COOPER & COOPER

312 Scott Street

Montgomery, Alabama 36104

(334) 262-4887

(334) 262-4880 (Facsimile)

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on this the 18th day of January, 2007 , I have served a copy of the

foregoing Motion to Continue Upon Ms. Morris, AUSA , at the last known address of: P.O.

Box 197, Montgomery, Al By placing a copy of the same in the United States Mail properly

addressed and postage prepaid and electronically.

s/James R. Cooper, Jr.

JAMES R. COOPER, JR.

Cc:

Roy Dale Wallace

Montgomery City Jail

P.O. Box 159

Montgomery, Al 36104

Case 1:06-cr-00170-WHA-CSC Document 335 Filed 01/18/2007 Page 2 of 2
Subpart 826.2 - Disaster or Emergency

Assistance Activities

Parent topic: PART 826 - OTHER SOCIOECONOMIC PROGRAMS

826.202-1 Local area set-aside.

(c) The contracting officer shall determine whether a local area set-aside should be further

restricted to verified Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Businesses (SDVOSBs) or VeteranOwned Small Businesses (VOSBs) pursuant to subpart 819.70.

826.202-2 Evaluation preference.

Pursuant to 38 U.S.C. 8128, the contracting officer shall include evaluation factors in accordance

with 815.304 and the evaluation criteria clause prescribed at 815.304-71(a), 852.215-70, ServiceDisabled Veteran-Owned and Veteran-Owned Small Business Evaluation Factors.
Order filed April 15, 2014.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 13

- 00820

- CV

____________ THE BRANCH LAW FIRM L.L.P AND TURNER W. BRANCH , Appellant s V.
WILLIAM SHANE OSBORN , Appellee

On Appeal from the 164th District Court

Harr is County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2012

- 34395



### O R D E R

The clerk’s record was filed October 2, 2013

. Supplemental Clerk’s Records were filed on December 4, 2013, and December 16, 2013. Our review has determined that relevant item s have been om itted from the clerk's record. See Tex. R. App. P. 34.5(c). The record does not contain documents that were filed under seal

.2

The Harris County District Clerk is directed to file a supplemental clerk’s record on or before April 30, 3014 , containing the following :
1. Plaintiff W. Shane Osborn’s Supplemental Response to Defendants’ Motion to Compel Arbitration and Stay Proceedings , including Exhibit A, filed under seal July 18, 2013; and
2. Exhibit C to Plaintiff W. Shane Osborn’s Motion to Compel Compliance with the Cou rt’s Order filed under seal July 17, 2013. The supplemental clerk’s record containing these documents filed under seal shall remain under seal.

PER CURIAM
MINERAL COUNTY

HAWTHORNE AIRPORT - HTH

MINERAL COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

SHELLEY HARTMAN

9299471820000

88-0505497
MINERAL COUNTY ECON DEV AUTHORITY NATIONS INVESTMENT COMPANY

HIGH SIERRA AIRLINES

FIRST IN FLIGHT

OCEAN HELICOPTER

U.S. CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT: NV02

XX

XX XX
MAINTENANCE REPAIR OPERATION (MRO)

XX

XX

XX

XX

XX

XX

XX

XX

XX

XX

XX

XX
$500,000

$500,000

$25,000

$25,000

$525,000

XX

XX XX
XX

XX