alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 300.4 Selecting organizational boundaries. ( a ) Each reporting entity must disclose in its entity statement the approach used to establish its organizational boundaries, which should be consistent with the following guidelines: ( 1 ) In general, entities should use financial control as the primary basis for determining their organizational boundaries, with financial control meaning the ability to direct the financial and operating policies of all elements of the entity with a view to gaining economic or other benefits from its activities over a period of many years. This approach should ensure that all sources, including those controlled by subsidiaries, that are wholly or largely owned by the entity are covered by its reports. Sources that are under long-term lease of the entity may, depending on the provisions of such leases, also be considered to be under the entity's financial control. Sources that are temporarily leased or operated by an entity generally would not be considered to be under its financial control.
( 2 ) Entities may establish organizational boundaries using approaches other than financial control, such as equity share or operational control, but must disclose how the use of these other approaches results in organizational boundaries that differ from those resulting from using the financial control approach.
( 3 ) Emissions from facilities or vehicles that are partially-owned or leased may be included at the entity's discretion, provided that the entity has taken reasonable steps to assure that doing so does not result in the double counting of emissions, sequestration or emission reductions. Emissions reductions or sequestration associated with land, facilities or other sources not owned or leased by an entity may not be included in the entity's reports under the program unless the entity has long-term control over the emissions or sequestration of the source and the owner of the source has agreed that the emissions or sequestration may be included in the entity's report.
( 4 ) If the scope of a defined entity extends beyond the United States, the reporting entity should use the same approach to determining its organizational boundaries in the U.S. and outside the U.S.
( b ) Each reporting entity must keep separate reports on emissions or emission reductions that occur within its defined boundaries and those that occur outside its defined boundaries. Entities must also keep separate reports on emissions and emission reductions that occur outside the United States and those that occur within the United States.
( c ) An entity that intends to register its entity-wide emissions reductions must document and maintain its organizational boundary for accounting and reporting purposes.
PGI 225.872-5 Contract administration.

(b)(i) When contract administration services are required on contracts to be performed in qualifying

countries, direct the request to the cognizant activity listed in the Federal Directory of Contract

Administration Services. The cognizant activity also will arrange contract administration services for

DoD subcontracts that qualifying country sources place in the United States.

(ii) The contract administration activity receiving a delegation shall determine whether any portions

of the delegation are covered by memoranda of understanding annexes and, if so, shall delegate

those functions to the appropriate organization in the qualifying country's government.

Parent topic: PGI 225.872 Contracting with qualifying country sources.
Exhibit 32

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


The undersigned  hereby certify  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that the quarterly
report of United States Basketball League, Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly
period ended May 31, 2006 fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a)
or  15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934  and  that  the  information
contained  in such  quarterly  report  on Form  10-QSB  fairly  presents  in all
material  respects the  financial  condition  and results of operation of United
States Basketball League, Inc.

Date: July 24, 2006

/s/Daniel T. Meisenheimer, III
-----------------------------------
Daniel T. Meisenheimer, III
President



Date: July 24, 2006

/s/Richard C. Meisenheimer
-----------------------------------
Richard C. Meisenheimer
Chief Financial Officer
2007-2399.

#### State v. Jones.

Hamilton App. No. C-070083. On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied.

Pfeifer and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent.
Exhibit 32.2


Certification of Chief Financial Officer Under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002








The undersigned officer of The First Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company") hereby certifies that the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010 to which this certification is being furnished as an exhibit (the "Report"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. This certification is provided pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K ("Item 601(b)(32)") promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"), and the Exchange Act. In accordance with clause (ii) of Item 601(b)(32), this certification (A) shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and (B) shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.





Date: November 8, 2010








/s/ F. Stephen Ward


F. Stephen Ward


Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer


The First Bancorp, Inc.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1019 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
H. Res. 1019

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                         July 24, 2018.
    Resolved, That the conference report accompanying H.R. 5515, to authorize 
appropriations for fiscal year 2019 for military activities of the Department of 
Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department 
of Energy, to prescribe military personnel strengths for such fiscal year, and 
for other purposes, in the opinion of this House, contravenes the first clause 
of the seventh section of the first article of the Constitution of the United 
States and is an infringement of the privileges of this House and that such bill 
be respectfully recommitted to the committee of conference.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Case 3:06-cr-00210-MEF-CSC Document 21 Filed 11/20/2006 Page 1 of 1
#### James M. Strong, Respondent, v. Peggy Cahn, Appellant.

Order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated May 16, 1969, and judgment entered thereon on July 24, 1969, affirmed, with one bill of $10 costs and disbursements (see *Weisl*v. *Edward J. Clancy-Ann Vera Hughes, Inc.,*278 App. Div. 714; *Wm. E. Morrell, Inc.*v. *Carlstedt,*268 App. Div. 1070; *Schenck*v. *Sleepy Hollow Cemetery,*265 App. Div. 974). Beldock, P. J., Christ, Brennan, Hopkins and Martuscello, JJ., concur.
§ 1040.88 Remedial and affirmative action by recipients. ( a ) Where a recipient is found to have discriminated on the basis of age, the recipient shall take such remedial action as the Director, Office of Civil Rights and Diversity, considers necessary to overcome the effects of the discrimination.
( b ) Even in the absence of a finding of discrimination, a recipient may take affirmative action to overcome the effects of conditions that resulted in limited participation in the recipient's program or activity on the basis of age.
( c ) If a recipient operating a program or activity which serves the elderly or children, in addition to persons of other ages, provides special benefits to the elderly or to children, the provision of those benefits shall be presumed to be voluntary affirmative action provided that it does not have the effect of excluding otherwise eligible persons from participation in the program or activity.
[50 FR 8089, Feb. 27, 1985, as amended at 68 FR 51348, Aug. 26, 2003]
##### 



Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) UNDER THE EXCHANGE ACT
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of B.H.I.T. Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant is made known to us by others, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    [Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238];c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andd)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Date: October 31, 2006
    
    By:
    
    /s/ James Benenson, Jr.James Benenson, Jr.President and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 21.1

LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES



|                                           |  |                                              
|------------------------------------------ |  | ---------------------------------------------
|Name                                       |  | Jurisdiction of Incorporation orOrganization:
|PBF Holding Company LLC                    |  | Delaware                                     
|PBF Services Company LLC                   |  | Delaware                                     
|PBF Investments LLC                        |  | Delaware                                     
|Delaware City Refining Company LLC         |  | Delaware                                     
|Delaware Pipeline Company LLC              |  | Delaware                                     
|PBF Power Marketing LLC                    |  | Delaware                                     
|Paulsboro Natural Gas Pipeline Company LLC |  | Delaware                                     
|Paulsboro Refining Company LLC             |  | Delaware                                     
|Toledo Refining Company LLC                |  | Delaware                                     
|PBF Finance Corporation                    |  | Delaware                                     
|PBF Logistics LP                           |  | Delaware                                     
|PBF Rail Logistics Company LLC             |  | Delaware                                     
|Delaware City Terminaling Company LLC      |  | Delaware
#### § 13.45 Deposit in Treasury of United States.

All amounts collected pursuant to this part shall be deposited as miscellaneous receipts in the Treasury of the United States, except as provided in 31 U.S.C. 3806(g).
§ 20.2106 Records of individual monitoring results. ( a ) *Recordkeeping requirement.* Each licensee shall maintain records of doses received by all individuals for whom monitoring was required pursuant to § 20.1502, and records of doses received during planned special exposures, accidents, and emergency conditions. These records[5] must include, when applicable— ( 1 ) The deep-dose equivalent to the whole body, lens dose equivalent, shallow-dose equivalent to the skin, and shallow-dose equivalent to the extremities;
( 2 ) The estimated intake of radionuclides (see § 20.1202);
( 3 ) The committed effective dose equivalent assigned to the intake of radionuclides;
( 4 ) The specific information used to assess the committed effective dose equivalent pursuant to § 20.1204 (a) and (c), and when required by § 20.1502;
( 5 ) The total effective dose equivalent when required by § 20.1202; and
( 6 ) The total of the deep-dose equivalent and the committed dose to the organ receiving the highest total dose.
( b ) *Recordkeeping frequency.* The licensee shall make entries of the records specified in paragraph (a) of this section at least annually.
( c ) *Recordkeeping format.* The licensee shall maintain the records specified in paragraph (a) of this section on NRC Form 5, in accordance with the instructions for NRC Form 5, or in clear and legible records containing all the information required by NRC Form 5.
( d ) *Privacy protection.* The records required under this section should be protected from public disclosure because of their personal privacy nature. These records are protected by most State privacy laws and, when transferred to the NRC, are protected by the Privacy Act of 1974, Public Law 93-579, 5 U.S.C. 552a, and the Commission's regulations in 10 CFR part 9.
( e ) The licensee shall maintain the records of dose to an embryo/fetus with the records of dose to the declared pregnant woman. The declaration of pregnancy shall also be kept on file, but may be maintained separately from the dose records.
( f ) The licensee shall retain the required form or record until the Commission terminates each pertinent license requiring this record. This includes records required under the standards for protection against radiation in effect prior to January 1, 1994.
[56 FR 23404, May 21, 1991, as amended at 60 FR 20186, Apr. 25, 1995; 63 FR 39483, July 23, 1998] Footnotes -
20.2106
[5] Assessments of dose equivalent and records made using units in effect before the licensee's adoption of this part need not be changed.
AFS-16-4829-E 

August 4, 2016

 Exemption No. 17057

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2016-0192

Ms. Evelyn D. Sahr

Mr. Jonathan T. Linde

Council for Cargo Airlines Limited

Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott, LLC

1717 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, 12th Floor

Washington, DC 20006

Dear Ms. Sahr and Mr. Linde:

This letter is to inform you that we have denied your petition for exemption. It transmits our 

decision and explains its basis.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated November 6, 2015, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) 

on behalf of Cargo Airlines Limited (CAL) for an exemption from § 61.77 of Title 14, Code 

of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) to the extent necessary to allow CAL to obtain special 

purpose authorizations for its pilots to operate test and ferry flights of a single U.S.-registered 

B747-400BCF.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because this is not a precedent-setting petition, and any delay in acting 

on this petition would be detrimental to CAL.

The FAA recently issued a denial of exemption in circumstances similar in all material 

respects to those presented in your petition. In Denial of Exemption No. 16104 (copy 

enclosed), the FAA found that the petitioner sought to circumvent the FAA pilot certification 

process for convenience and economic relief. The FAA recognized that it would be 

advantageous for CAL to use Israeli pilots with special purpose pilot authorizations to ferry 

the airplane, but was never the intent of the FAA in adopting § 61.77(a) to issue special 

purpose pilot authorizations in lieu of complying with the FAA pilot certification process. 
2

CAL is a part 129 certificated air carrier and conducts scheduled and unscheduled air transport 

flights into and out the U.S. on a regular basis. As a certified part 129 air carrier, CAL is well 

versed on the security concerns and requirements of operating at major airports and 

maintenance facilities within Israel, the U.S., and Europe. In contrast, Israel Aircraft Industries 

is an aircraft manufacturer, is not a certificated part 129 air carrier, and faces unique security 

concerns in the country of Israel as it conducts unscheduled flights from its facilities within 

Israel, the U.S., and at a number of locations throughout the world. 

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that—

• they do not differ materially from those presented by the petitioner in the enclosed Denial

of Exemption No. 16104;

• the reasons stated by the FAA for denying the enclosed Denial of Exemption No. 16104

also apply to the situation you present; and

• a grant of exemption would not be in the public interest.

Our Decision

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. §§ 106(f), 40113 and 44701, which the FAA 

Administrator has delegated to me, I hereby deny the petition of Cargo Airlines Limited for an 

exemption from 14 CFR § 61.77.

Sincerely,

/s/

John Barbagallo

Deputy Director, Flight Standards Service

Enclosure
1215.606 Agency procedures.       The OA contracting office is the designated point of contact for receipt and handling of unsolicited proposals (*see* 1215.604). The assigned DOT contracting office will review and evaluate the proposal within 30 calendar days, if practicable, in accordance with FAR 15.606–1, Receipt and initial review, to inform the offeror of the reasons for rejection and the proposed disposition of the unsolicited proposal.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 1215.6—Unsolicited Proposals
#### In the Matter of Roman Kevilly, Appellant, v Alan L. Honorof, as Judge of the Court of Claims of the State of New York, et al., Respondents.

Submitted December 3, 2007;

decided January 10, 2008

Reported below, 2007 NY Slip Op 76100(U).

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution.
Subpart 1224.1—Protection of Individual Privacy    **Parent topic:** PART 1224—PROTECTION OF PRIVACY AND FREEDOM OF INFORMATION1224.102-70 General.       (a) Records maintained in a Privacy Act system of records shall not be released except by the Government or at the Government's direction regardless of whether the Government or a contractor acting on behalf of the Government is maintaining the records. Examples of systems of records are:          (1) Personnel, payroll and background records about any officer or employee of DOT, or other person, including his or her residential address;          (2) Medical histories and medical records concerning individuals, including applications for licenses; and          (3) Any other record containing information about an individual which includes that individual's name or other personal identifier.          (b) Examples of records to which the Privacy Act does not apply are:          (1) Records that are maintained by a contractor on individuals employed by the contractor in the process of providing goods and services to the Federal government; and          (2) Student records generated in connection with the student's attendance (*e.g.,* admission forms, grade reports) at an educational institution contracted by the agency to provide training to students. These records must be similar to those maintained on other students and must not be commingled with records of other students.1224.103 Procedures.       DOT rules and regulations implementing the Privacy Act of 1974 are located at 49 CFR part 10.