alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



EXHIBIT 99

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of B.H.I.T. Inc. on Form 10-QSB for
the period ending September 30, 2002, the undersigned being the chief
executive officer and chief financial officer of B.H.I.T. Inc., do hereby
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of their knowledge:



| | 1. |  | This Quarterly Report of Form 10-QSB fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended, and                                                  
| | -- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | 2. |  | The information contained in this report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Registrant at the dates and for the periods shown in such
report.

|                                                                                                                          |  |                       
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------
|B.H.I.T. Inc.                                                                                                             |  |                       
|                                                                                                                         
|By:  /s/ James Benenson, Jr.James Benenson, Jr.
Chairman of the Board of Directors,
President and Chief Executive Officer |  | Date: November 5, 2002
|                                                                                                                         
|By:  /s/ John V. CurciJohn V. Curci Vice-President,
Treasurer & Chief Financial Officer
Principal Accounting Officer      |  | Date: November 5, 2002

15
#### GARIBALDI REALTY & CONSTRUCTION CO. v. SANTANGELO et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

June 5, 1914.)

Action by the Garibaldi Realty & Construction Company against Guisepina Santangelo and others.

No opinion. Motion to dismiss appeal granted, with $10 costs, unless appellant comply with terms stated in order. Order filed.
Subpart 1601.1—Purpose, Authority,

Issuance

Parent topic: PART 1601—FEDERAL ACQUISITION REGULATIONS SYSTEM

1601.101 Purpose.

(a) This subpart establishes chapter 16, Office of Personnel Management Federal Employees Health

Benefits Acquisition Regulation, within title 48, the Federal Acquisition Regulation System, of the

Code of Federal Regulations. The short title of this regulation shall be FEHBAR.

(b) The purpose of the FEHBAR is to implement and supplement the Federal Acquisition Regulation

(FAR) specifically for acquiring and administering contracts with health insurance carriers in the

Federal Employees Health Benefits Program (FEHBP).

1601.102 Authority.

(a) The FEHBAR is issued by the Director of the Office of Personnel Management in accordance with

the authority of 5 U.S.C. chapter 89 and other applicable law and regulation.

(b) The FEHBAR does not replace or incorporate regulations found at 5 CFR part 890, which

provides the substantive policy guidance for administration of the FEHBP under 5 U.S.C. Chapter

89. The following is the order of precedence in interpreting a contract provision under the FEHBP:

(1) 5 U.S.C. Chapter 89;

(2) 5 CFR part 890;

(3) 48 CFR Chapters 1 and 16;

(4) The FEHBP contract.

1601.103 Applicability.

The FAR is generally applicable to contracts negotiated in the FEHBP pursuant to 5 U.S.C. chapter

89. The FEHBAR implements and supplements the FAR where necessary to identify basic and

significant acquisition policies unique to the FEHBP.

1601.104 Issuance.
1601.104-1 Publication and code arrangement.

(a) The FEHBAR and its subsequent changes are published in

(1) Daily issues of the Federal Register; and

(2) Cumulative form of the Code of Federal Regulations.

(b) The FEHBAR is issued as chapter 16 of title 48 of the Code of Federal Regulations.

1601.104-2 Arrangement of regulation.

(a) General. The FEHBAR conforms with the arrangement and numbering system prescribed by FAR

1.104. However, when a FAR part or subpart is adequate for use without further OPM

implementation or supplementation, there will be no corresponding FEHBAR part, subpart, etc. The

FEHBAR is to be used in conjunction with the FAR and the order for use is:

(1) FAR;

(2) FEHBAR.

(b) Citation.

(1) In formal documents, such as legal briefs, citation of chapter 16 material that has been published

in the Federal Register will be to title 48 of the Code of Federal Regulations.

(2) In informal documents, any section of chapter 16 may be identified as “FEHBAR” followed by the

section number.

1601.106 OMB approval under the Paperwork Reduction

Act.

The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980 (Pub. L. 96–511) requires Federal agencies to obtain approval

from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) before collecting information from ten or more

members of the public. The information collection and recordkeeping requirements contained in this

regulation have been approved by the OMB. The following OMB control numbers apply.

Provision Control No.

FEHBAR 1604.705 3206–0145

FAR 9.1 3206–0145
WaterChef, Inc.
                                                       1007 Glen Cove Avenue
                                                       Glen Head, New York 11545
                                                       Phone: (516) 656-0059
                                                       Fax: (516) 656-9095




                   CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section
1350)


Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 ( 18 U.S.C. Section
1350), the undersigned, David A. Conway, President and Chief Executive Officer,
and Acting Chief Financial Officer, of WaterChef, Inc., a Delaware Corporation
(the " Company"), does hereby certify, to his knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2002 of the
Company (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the material contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.





                                   /s/ David A. Conway
                                       -------------------
                                       David A. Conway
                                       President and Chief Executive Officer and
                                       Acting Chief Financial Officer

                                       August 23, 2002
PGI 216.403-2 Fixed-price incentive

(successive targets) contracts.

The formula specified in FAR 16.403-2(a)(1)(iii) does not apply for the life of the contract. It is used

to fix the firm target profit for the contract. To provide an incentive consistent with the

circumstances, the formula should reflect the relative risk involved in establishing an incentive

arrangement where cost and pricing information were not sufficient to permit the negotiation of firm

targets at the outset.

Parent topic: PGI 216.403 Fixed-price incentive contracts.
#### § 431.131 Purpose and scope.

This subpart contains energy conservation requirements for commercial ice makers, pursuant to Part C of Title III of the Energy Policy and Conservation Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 6311-6317.
###### Editorial Note on Part 4

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 4 appear at 77 FR 39904, July 6, 2012.

#### § 4.92 Forms and instructions.

The responsible NRC official shall issue and promptly make available to interested persons forms and detailed instructions and procedures for effectuating this subpart as applied to programs to which this subpart applies and for which he is responsible.
#### LOVELL-McCONNELL MFG. CO. et al. v. INTERNATIONAL AUTOMOBILE LEAGUE.

(Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

November 12, 1912.)

No. 78.

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Western District of New York. Motion by appellants to amend the petition of appeal, citation, and assignment of errors by substituting for the words and figures “9th of March, 1912,” the words and figures “12th of March, 1912”; the latter being the date of the order which appellants seek to review.

J. B. Corcoran, of Buffalo, N. Y., for the motion.

Drury W. Cooper, of Now York City, opposed.

Before LACOMBE, WABD, and NOYES, Circuit Judges.

PEB CUBIAM.

The affidavit submitted by appellants after argument at the suggestion of the court shows that this is an instance of “clerical error,” and we see no reason why the relief should not be granted. There is power to grant such relief, because the original notice of appeal described the order sought to be appealed from, not only by its date, but also by a description of one of the papers on which it was based and of tbe relief it granted. It is merely making certain what, on the papers as they stood, was uncertain. The motion is granted.
###### Editorial Note on Part 4

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 4 appear at 77 FR 39904, July 6, 2012.

#### §§ 4.512-4.529 [Reserved]
EXHIBIT
32




Certification
Pursuant to


18
U.S.C. Section 1350,


As
Adopted Pursuant to


Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Universal Detection Technology (the
"Registrant") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2010, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Jacques Tizabi, Principal Executive Officer and Acting Principal Financial
Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of the Registrant, certify to the best
of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Registrant.









Dated: August 23,
      2010
              /s/ Jacques
      TizabiJacques
    TizabiPrincipal
      Executive Officer and Acting Principal Financial Officer and
                Principal
      Accounting Officer
Editorial Note on Part 34
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 34 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

§ 34.42 Radiation Safety Officer for industrial radiography. The RSO shall ensure that radiation safety activities are being performed in accordance with approved procedures and regulatory requirements in the daily operation of the licensee's program. ( a ) The minimum qualifications, training, and experience for RSOs for industrial radiography are as follows: ( 1 ) Completion of the training and testing requirements of § 34.43(a);
( 2 ) 2000 hours of hands-on experience as a qualified radiographer in industrial radiographic operations; and
( 3 ) Formal training in the establishment and maintenance of a radiation protection program.
( b ) The Commission will consider alternatives when the RSO has appropriate training and/or experience in the field of ionizing radiation, and in addition, has adequate formal training with respect to the establishment and maintenance of a radiation safety protection program.
( c ) The specific duties and authorities of the RSO include, but are not limited to: ( 1 ) Establishing and overseeing all operating, emergency, and ALARA procedures as required by 10 CFR part 20 of this chapter, and reviewing them regularly to ensure that the procedures in use conform to current 10 CFR part 20 procedures, conform to other NRC regulations and to the license conditions.
( 2 ) Overseeing and approving all phases of the training program for radiographic personnel, ensuring that appropriate and effective radiation protection practices are taught;
( 3 ) Ensuring that required radiation surveys and leak tests are performed and documented in accordance with the regulations, including any corrective measures when levels of radiation exceed established limits;
( 4 ) Ensuring that personnel monitoring devices are calibrated and used properly by occupationally-exposed personnel, that records are kept of the monitoring results, and that timely notifications are made as required by § 20.2203 of this chapter; and
( 5 ) Ensuring that operations are conducted safely and to assume control for instituting corrective actions including stopping of operations when necessary.
( d ) Licensees will have until June 27, 1999, to meet the requirements of paragraph (a) or (b) of this section.
[62 FR 28963, May 28, 1997, as amended at 63 FR 37061, July 9, 1998]
11.9202 Acquisition of FAA certified parts for depot level repairable (DLR) items.    (a) The contracting officer shall acquire FAA certified parts for DLR items based on the requiring activity’s requirements and acceptable sources, as stated in documentation that accompanies the purchase request and in the following:       (1) Air Force Materiel Command (AFMC) Form 761, Acquisition Method Code (AMC)/ Acquisition Method Suffix Code (AMSC) Screening Analysis Worksheet (SAW); and the current version of the Purchase Request Process System generated Oracle Report entitled “AMC/AMSC SAW Report.” They contain the basic item description and information; screening and/or evaluation remarks; AMC/AMSC codes; testing, inspection, and acceptance requirements; and miscellaneous spares information. The requirement for FAA certification is stated in the “Remarks” Subsection of the “Screening/Evaluation/Remarks” Section.       (2) AFMC Form 807, Recommended Quality Assurance Provisions and Special Inspection: Requirements, which contains special inspection requirements and/or instructions for the procurement of FAA certified parts.       (b) Offerors not listed on the AFMC forms must provide a Source Approval Request (SAR) to the contracting officer to be considered for future awards. The contracting officer shall submit the SAR to the product specialist. The product specialist will facilitate the processing of the SAR with the requiring activity.       (c) Government surplus material is not acceptable for FAA certified parts. The contractor shall furnish only new, unused material.       (d) Contracting officers shall include procurement note C22 in all solicitations and awards when procuring FAA certified parts for DLR items.       *****       C22 Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Certified Parts – Depot Level Repairable (DLR) Items (DEC 2018)       Offerors not identified by the requiring activity as an acceptable source are ineligible for award. To be considered for future awards, ineligible offerors must submit to the contracting officer a Source Approval Request, which must be approved by the requiring activity.       ***** **Parent topic:** SUBPART 11.92 – FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION (FAA) CERTIFIED PARTS
#### § 1706.4 Head of the contracting activity.

The head of the contracting activity for the Board shall be the General Manager.
Editorial Note on Part 4
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 4 appear at 77 FR 39904, July 6, 2012.

§ 4.63 Procedures, evidence, and record. ( a ) The hearing, decision, and any administrative review thereof shall be conducted in conformity with 5 U.S.C. 554-557 (sections 5-8 of the Administrative Procedure Act), and in accordance with such procedures as are proper (and not inconsistent with §§ 4.61 through 4.64) relating to the conduct of the hearing, giving of notices subsequent to those provided for in § 4.51, taking of testimony, exhibits, arguments and briefs, requests for finding, and other related matters. Both the responsible NRC official and the applicant or recipient shall be entitled to introduce all relevant evidence on the issues as stated in the notice of hearing or as determined by the presiding officer at the outset of or during the hearing.
( b ) Technical rules of evidence shall not apply to hearings conducted pursuant to this subpart, but rules or principles designed to assure production of the most credible evidence available and to subject testimony to test by cross-examination shall be applied where reasonably necessary by the presiding officer. The presiding officer may exclude irrelevant, immaterial, or unduly repetitious evidence. All documents and other evidence offered or taken for the record shall be open to examination by the parties and opportunity shall be given to refute facts and arguments advanced on either side of the issues. A transcript shall be made of the oral evidence except to the extent the substance thereof is stipulated for the record.
( c ) Each decision made after a hearing has been held shall be based on the hearing record, and written findings of fact and conclusions of law shall be made.
( d ) If an applicant or recipient waives a hearing and submits written information or argument for the record in accordance with § 4.51(d), written findings of fact and conclusions of law shall be made.
[29 FR 19277, Dec. 31, 1964, as amended at 35 FR 11459, July 17, 1970; 38 FR 17928, July 5, 1973]
1449.402-3 Procedure for default.

In addition to the requirements of FAR 49.402-3(g), the notice of termination shall contain

instructions regarding the disposition of any Government property in the possession of the

contractor, and, in the case of construction contracts, materials, appliances, and structures that may

be on the construction site. The notice shall also contain a statement concerning the liability of the

contractor or its surety for any liquidated damages (See FAR 49.402-7).

Parent topic: Subpart 1449.4 - Termination for Default
§ 436.36 Conditions of payment. ( a ) Any amount paid by a Federal agency pursuant to any energy savings performance contract entered into under this subpart may be paid only from funds appropriated or otherwise made available to the agency for the payment of energy expenses and related operation and maintenance expenses which would have been incurred without an energy savings performance contract. The amount the agency would have paid is equal to: ( 1 ) The energy baseline under the energy savings performance contract (adjusted if appropriate under § 436.37), multiplied by the unit energy cost; and
( 2 ) Any related operations and maintenance cost prior to implementation of energy conservation measures, adjusted for increases in labor and material price indices.
( b ) Federal agencies may incur obligations pursuant to energy savings performance contracts to finance energy conservation measures provided guaranteed energy cost savings exceed the contractor's debt service requirements.
**Exhibit 34.4**

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 

The Board of Directors 

Cenlar FSB: 

We have examined management’s assertion, included in the accompanying Management Assessment, that Cenlar FSB (the Company) complied with the servicingcriteria set forth in Item 1122 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB for the residential mortgage loans platform as of and for the year ended December 31, 2014 except for 1122 (d)(1)(iii), which theCompany has determined is not applicable to the activities performed by them with respect to the servicing platform covered by this report See Appendix A of Management’s Assessment for the asset backed transactions covered by this platformManagement is responsible for the Company’s compliance with those servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assertion about the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria based on ourexamination. 

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards established by the American Institute of Certified PublicAccountants, as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing suchother procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of less than all of the individual asset backed transactions and securities that comprise the platform, testing of less than all of the servicingactivities related to the Platform and determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the servicing criteria. Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the selectedtransactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to determine whether errors may have occurred either prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affectedthe balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Ourexamination does not provide a legal determination on the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria. 

In our opinion, management’sassertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2014, for the residential mortgage loans platform is fairly stated, in all material respects. 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP 

February 27, 2015
```

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 243 (Monday, December 20, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 79376]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-31850]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

Change in Bank Control Notices; Acquisitions of Shares of a Bank 
or Bank Holding Company

    The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank 
Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and Sec.  225.41 of the Board's 
Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank 
holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the 
notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
    The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal 
Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for 
inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons 
may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for 
that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must 
be received not later than January 4, 2011.
    A. Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis (Jacqueline G. King, 
Community Affairs Officer) 90 Hennepin Avenue, Minneapolis, Minnesota 
55480-0291:
    1. Karl J. Breyer, Richard M. Ihrig, and Colleen J. Cooper, all in 
Minneapolis, Minnesota; to each acquire voting shares of First 
Advantage Bancshares, Inc., and thereby indirectly acquire voting 
shares of First Advantage Bank, both in Coon Rapids, Minnesota.

    Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, December 15, 
2010.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2010-31850 Filed 12-17-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
```