alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
mako100814_ex10-3.htm - Generated by SEC Publisher for SEC Filing






 



Exhibit 10.3

 

SECOND AMENDMENT TO AMENDED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

 

This Second Amendment (“Amendment”) to Amended Employment Agreement is made effective February 17, 2010, by and between Maurice R. Ferré, M.D. (“Executive”) and MAKO Surgical Corp. (“Company”).

 

Recitals

 

Whereas, Executive and Company entered into that certain Amended Employment Agreement, dated November 12, 2007 (the “Agreement”); 

 

Whereas, Executive and Company amended the Agreement effective February 13, 2009; and 

 

Whereas, Employee and Company, pursuant to Section 10.1 of the Agreement, now seek again to formally amend the Agreement by way of this Amendment;

 

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants, agreements, representations and warranties contained in the Agreement and this Amendment, the parties hereby agree as follows:

 

1.        Section 3.2 of the Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following provision:

 

Annual Cash Incentive.  Executive shall participate in and be subject to the Company’s Leadership Bonus Plan, in effect for any given year, as established by the Compensation Committee.  Executive’s  baseline Annual Cash Incentive amount will be 50% of the Annual Salary then in effect for each applicable year, provided, however, that Executive’s Annual Cash Incentive, if any, may be below, at, or above the target based upon the achievement of individual and objective Company annual performance criteria set forth in the Company’s Leadership Bonus Program, as established by the Compensation Committee, in its discretion.  The Annual Cash Incentive will be paid within 2 1⁄2 months after the end of the calendar year to which the Annual Cash Incentive relates.  

 

2.        Except as expressly provided herein, all terms and conditions set forth in the Agreement to which this Amendment applies, shall remain in full force and effect.  In the event of a conflict between this Amendment and the Agreement, this Amendment shall be controlling. 

 

3.        This Amendment may be executed in counterparts, each of which are deemed to be original, but both of which together constitute one and the same instrument.  Copies of signatures sent by facsimile transmission are deemed to be originals for purposes of execution and proof of this Amendment.

 

In Witness Whereof, the parties have duly executed this Amendment to be effective as of the day and year first above written.

 


	
MAKO Surgical Corp.

	
 

	
EXECUTIVE


	
 

	
 

	
 

	
 

	
 


	
 

	
 

	
 

	
 

	
 


	
By: 

	
 /s/ Marcelo Chao

	
 

	
By: 

	
 /s/ Maurice R. Ferré


	
Marcelo Chao

Chairman, Compensation Committee



Date: February 17, 2010

	
 

	
Maurice R. Ferré, M.D





Date: February 17, 2010.





 


 

Second Amendment to M. Ferré Amended Employment Agreement
# Subpart 1205.1—Dissemination of Information

**Parent topic:**PART 1205—PUBLICIZING CONTRACT ACTIONS

## 1205.101 Methods of disseminating information.

(a) The DOT Office of Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590 publishes a Procurement Forecast of planned procurements each fiscal year on their website at *https://www.transportation.gov/osdbu/procurement-forecast/summary/.*
#### John H. Zimmerman, Appellant, v. Sam Garafolo et al., Appellees.

Gen. No. 9,520.

*505opinion filed September 19, 1940.

John H. Page and Edward S. Foltz, Jr., for appellant; Stanley H. Guyer, for appellees.

Opinion by

Justice Dove.

‘‘Not to be published in full.”
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 513 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
H. Res. 513

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                    September 13, 2017.
    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider in the House the bill (H.R. 3697) to amend the Immigration and 
Nationality Act with respect to aliens associated with criminal gangs, and for 
other purposes. All points of order against consideration of the bill are 
waived. The amendment printed in the report of the Committee on Rules 
accompanying this resolution shall be considered as adopted. The bill, as 
amended, shall be considered as read. All points of order against provisions in 
the bill, as amended, are waived. The previous question shall be considered as 
ordered on the bill, as amended, and on any further amendment thereto, to final 
passage without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate equally 
divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of the Committee 
on the Judiciary; and (2) one motion to recommit with or without instructions.
    Sec. 2.  On any legislative day during the period from September 15, 2017, 
through September 22, 2017--
     (a) the Journal of the proceedings of the previous day shall be considered 
as approved; and
    (b) the Chair may at any time declare the House adjourned to meet at a date 
and time, within the limits of clause 4, section 5, article I of the 
Constitution, to be announced by the Chair in declaring the adjournment.
    Sec. 3.  The Speaker may appoint Members to perform the duties of the Chair 
for the duration of the period addressed by section 2 of this resolution as 
though under clause 8(a) of rule I.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Subpart 1246.1—General

Parent topic: PART 1246—QUALITY ASSURANCE

1246.101 Definitions.

1246.101-70 Additional definitions.

As used in this subpart—

At no additional cost to the Government means at no increase in price for firm-fixed-price contracts,

at no increase in target or ceiling price for fixed price incentive contracts (see FAR 46.707), or at no

increase in estimated cost or fee for cost-reimbursement contracts.

Defect means any condition or characteristic in any supplies or services furnished by the contractor

under the contract that is not in compliance with the requirements of the contract.

Major acquisition means an acquisition or for supplies or services that requires submission of an

OMB Exhibit 300 (Capital Asset Plan/Business Case) in accordance with OMB Circular A–11,

Preparation, Submission and Execution of the Budget, and for information technology or information

technology related acquisitions, compliance with the Department Chief Information Officer (CIO)

Policy (CIOP). A major acquisition typically has one or more of the following characteristics—

(1) Life-cycle costs of $150 million or more;

(2) Is a financial system, e-gov system, or e-business system with a life-cycle cost of $500,000 or

more; or

(3) An acquisition that does not meet the dollar thresholds of paragraph

(1) or (2) of this definition but—

(i) Is mission-critical;

(ii) Requires special management attention because of its importance to an OA mission;

(iii) Plays a significant role in the administration of OA programs, processes or other resources; or

(iv) Directly supports the President's Management Agenda.

Performance requirements means the operating capabilities, maintenance, and reliability

characteristics of a system that are determined to be necessary for it to fulfill the requirement for

which the system is designed.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

JOEL SONGS, EXPERIENCE HENDRIX, )

L.L.C., ET AL., )

)

PLAINTIFF, )

)

VS. ) CASE NO.: 1:06-CV-774

)

SHELLEY BROADCASTING COMPANY, )

INC., STAGE DOOR DEVELOPMENT, INC. )

AND JACK MIZELL. )

)

DEFENDANTS. )

MO TIO N TO WITHDRAW

COMES NOW Steve McGowan in the above styled cause and moves the Honorable

Court to allow him to withdraw from same and as grounds therefore shows unto the Court

that the defendant has chosen to proceed pro se.

/s/ Steve McGowan

STEVE MCGOWAN (MCG071)

Attorney for Defendants

P.O. Box 2101

Dothan, Alabama 36301

(334) 678-8200

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a true and exact copy of the above and foregoing was served upon the

below named counsel of record through Electronic Notification, this the 13th day of July.

Dylan C. Black

Bradley Arant Rose & White LLP

One Federal Place

1819 Fifth Avenue North

Birmingham, Alabama 35203

/s/ Steve McGowan

OF COUNSEL

Case 1:06-cv-00774-MHT-SRW Document 30 Filed 07/13/2007 Page 1 of 1
#### HODGES, Respondent, v. PIONEER IRON WORKS, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

July 31, 1914.)

Action by Dayton Hodges against the Pioneer Iron Works.

No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.
Exmovere Holdings, Inc.


Exhibit 10.2












































































































































































































































































SCHEDULE 1




Description of Technology







All products that are fabricated and manufactured using the designs from the following patents pending as described below:




Bluetooth-transmitting biosensor wristwatch to simultaneously detect and continuously monitor heart rate, heart rate variability, skin conductance, skin temperature, relative moment and other vital signs.




Biosensor enhanced steering wheel to simultaneously detect and continuously monitor electrocardiogram, galvanic skin response, skin temperature and relative movement.

 

Biosensor enhanced turnstile to detect galvanic skin response, skin temperature and torque.

 

Biosensor enhanced PC mouse to detect heart rate, galvanic skin response, skin temperature and relative movement.

 

System to detect human emotions from the above mentioned wristwatch, above mentioned steering wheel, above mentioned turnstile and above mentioned mouse.

 

System to process physiological, emotional and hardware-related alerts through the internet, cellular networks and other media from the above mentioned products.





























































18
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Office of the Secretary

                    The following Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience and Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits were filed under Subpart B (formerly Subpart Q) of the Department of Transportation's Procedural Regulations (See 14 CFR 301.201*et seq.*). The due date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motions To Modify Scope are set forth below for each application. Following the Answer period DOT may process the application by expedited procedures. Such procedures may consist of the adoption of a show-cause order, a tentative order, or in appropriate cases a final order without further proceedings.                

*Docket Number:*                     DOT-OST-2010-0276.                

*Date Filed:*                     November 5, 2010.                

*Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motion To Modify Scope:*                     November 26, 2010.                

*Description:*                     Application of Volga-Dnepr Airlines LLC requesting a foreign air carrier permit to engage in charter foreign air transportation of property and mail between any point or points in the Russian Federation and any point or points in the United States and other all cargo charters.                

Renee V. Wright,

Program Manager, Docket Operations, Federal Register Liaison.

[FR Doc. 2010-31718 Filed 12-16-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 297 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 297

  Supporting the goals and ideals of a National Medal of Honor Day to 
    celebrate and honor the recipients of the Medal of Honor on the 
          anniversary of the inception of that medal in 1863.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 24, 2005

  Mr. Salazar (for himself and Mr. Rogers of Michigan) submitted the 
  following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Armed 
                                Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Supporting the goals and ideals of a National Medal of Honor Day to 
    celebrate and honor the recipients of the Medal of Honor on the 
          anniversary of the inception of that medal in 1863.

Whereas the Medal of Honor, the highest distinction that can be awarded to a 
        member of the Armed Forces, is awarded by the President, in the name of 
        the Congress, to members of the Armed Forces who have distinguished 
        themselves conspicuously by gallantry and intrepidity at the risk of 
        their lives above and beyond the call of duty;
Whereas the Nation will forever be in debt to the recipients of the Medal of 
        Honor for their bravery and sacrifice in times of war or armed conflict;
Whereas the first Medal of Honor awards were presented to six men on March 25, 
        1863, by the Secretary of War;
Whereas only 3,441 individuals out of the millions of men and women who have 
        served the Nation in war, military operations, or other armed conflicts 
        have been awarded the Medal of Honor;
Whereas there are 123 Medal of Honor living recipients as of May 23, 2005;
Whereas it is appropriate to honor the heroic recipients of the Medal of Honor;
Whereas public awareness of the importance of the Medal of Honor has declined in 
        recent years;
Whereas the designation of a National Medal of Honor Day would focus the efforts 
        of national, State, and local organizations striving to foster public 
        appreciation and recognition of Medal of Honor recipients; and
Whereas March 25 would be an appropriate date to observe National Medal of Honor 
        Day: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) recognizes the heroism and sacrifice of Medal of Honor 
        recipients;
            (2) recognizes the educational opportunity that a National 
        Medal of Honor Day would present to the American public; and
            (3) supports the goals and ideals of a National Medal of 
        Honor Day to celebrate and honor the contributions of Medal of 
        Honor recipients.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 501.192 [Reserved]
§ 52.24 Issuance of early site permit. ( a ) After conducting a hearing under § 52.21 and receiving the report to be submitted by the ACRS under § 52.23, the Commission may issue an early site permit, in the form the Commission deems appropriate, if the Commission finds that: ( 1 ) An application for an early site permit meets the applicable standards and requirements of the Act and the Commission's regulations;
( 2 ) Notifications, if any, to other agencies or bodies have been duly made;
( 3 ) There is reasonable assurance that the site is in conformity with the provisions of the Act, and the Commission's regulations;
( 4 ) The applicant is technically qualified to engage in any activities authorized;
( 5 ) The proposed inspections, tests, analyses and acceptance criteria, including any on emergency planning, are necessary and sufficient, within the scope of the early site permit, to provide reasonable assurance that the facility has been constructed and will be operated in conformity with the license, the provisions of the Act, and the Commission's regulations;
( 6 ) Issuance of the permit will not be inimical to the common defense and security or to the health and safety of the public;
( 7 ) Any significant adverse environmental impact resulting from activities requested under § 52.17(c) can be redressed; and
( 8 ) The findings required by subpart A of 10 CFR part 51 have been made.
( b ) The early site permit must specify the site characteristics, design parameters, and terms and conditions of the early site permit the Commission deems appropriate. Before issuance of either a construction permit or combined license referencing an early site permit, the Commission shall find that any relevant terms and conditions of the early site permit have been met. Any terms or conditions of the early site permit that could not be met by the time of issuance of the construction permit or combined license, must be set forth as terms or conditions of the construction permit or combined license.
( c ) The early site permit shall specify those 10 CFR 50.10 activities requested under § 52.17(c) that the permit holder is authorized to perform.
[72 FR 49517, Aug. 28, 2007, as amended at 72 FR 57447, Oct. 9, 2007]
COURTROOM DEPUTY’S MINUTES

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

/ INITIAL APPEARANCE DATE: 9/1/06

 BOND HEARING

 DETENTION HEARING DIGITAL Recording : 3:30 - 3:36

 PRELIMINARY (EXAMINATION)(HEARING)

 REMOVAL HEARING (R.40)

 ARRAIGNMENT

PRESIDING MAG. JUDGE: CHARLES S. COODY DEPUTY CLERK: Wanda Robinson

CASE NO: 3:06cr208-MEF DEFENDANT NAME: Jason Edward Cofield

AUSA: Andrew Schiff DEFT. ATTY: Michael Petersen 

 Type Counsel: ( )Retained; ( ) CJA; ( ) Waived; ( ) FPD

PTSO: Sandra Wood USPO: _________________________

Defendant ( ) does; ( / )does NOT need an interpreter

Interpreter present (/ ) NO; ( ) YES Name:

_____________________________________________________________________________

/ Date of Arrest 8/31/06 or  Arrest Rule 40 

/ Deft First Appearance. Advised of rights/charges. Prob/Sup Rel Violator

 Deft First Appearance with Counsel

 Deft. First Appearance without Counsel

 Requests appointed Counsel

/ Financial Affidavit executed ORAL MOTION FOR APPT OF COUNSEL

/ ORAL ORDER appointing Federal Public Defender - Notice of Appearance to be filed

 Panel Attorney Appointed;  to be appointed - prepare voucher

 Deft. Advises he will retain counsel. Has retained 

  Government’s ORAL Motion for Detention Hrg.  to be followed by written

motion; / Government’s WRITTEN Motion for Detention Hrg. filed

/ Detention Hearing  held; /set for 9/7/06 @ 2:00 p.m.

/ ORDER OF TEMPORARY DETENTION PENDING HEARING to be entered

 ORDER OF DETENTION HEARING PENDING TRIAL to be entered

 Release order entered. Deft advised of conditions of release

 BOND EXECUTED (M/D AL charges) $. 

 BOND EXECUTED (R. 40) - deft to report to originating district as ordered

/ Bond not executed. Defendant to remain in Marshal’s custody

 Deft. ORDERED REMOVED to originating district

 Waiver of  preliminary hearing;  Waiver Rule 40 hearing

 Court finds PROBABLE CAUSE. Defendant bound over to the Grand Jury

 ARRAIGNMENT HELD. Plea of NOT GUILTY entered.  Set for

 DISCOVERY DISCLOSURE DATE: 

 NOTICE to retained Criminal Defense Attorney handed to counsel

 WAIVER of Speedy Trial. CRIMINAL TERM:

Case 3:06-cr-00208-MEF-CSC Document 6 Filed 09/01/2006 Page 1 of 1
#### § 434.601 General.

601.1 This subpart provides an alternative path for compliance with the standards that allow for greater flexibility in the design of energy efficient buildings using an annual energy use method. This path provides an opportunity for the use of innovative designs, materials, and equipment such as daylighting, passive solar heating, and heat recovery, that may not be adequately evaluated by methods found in subpart D.

601.2 The Building Energy Compliance Alternative shall be used with subpart C and subpart D, 401.1, 401.2, 401.3.4 and in conjunction with the minimum requirements found in subsections 402.1, 402.2, and 402.3., 403.1, 403.2.1-7, 403.2.9 and 404.

601.3 Compliance under this section is demonstrated by showing that the calculated annual energy usage for the Proposed Design is less than or equal to a calculated Energy Use Budget. (See Figure 601.3, Building Energy Compliance Alternative). The analytical procedures in this subpart are only for determining design compliance, and are not to be used either to predict, document or verify annual energy consumption.

[![](https://img.federalregister.gov/ER06OC00.017/ER06OC00.017_large.png)](https://img.federalregister.gov/ER06OC00.017/ER06OC00.017_original_size.png)

601.4 Compliance under the Building Energy Use Budget method requires a detailed energy analysis, using a conventional simulation tool, of the Proposed Design. A life cycle cost analysis shall be used to select the fuel source for the HVAC systems, service hot water, and process loads from available alternatives. The Annual Energy Consumption of the Proposed Design with the life cycle cost-effective fuel selection is calculated to determine the modeled energy consumption, called the Design Energy Use.

601.5 The Design Energy Use is defined as the energy that is consumed within the five foot line of a proposed building per ft2 over a 24-hour day, 365-day year period and specified operating hours. The calculated Design Energy Use is then compared to a calculated Energy Use Budget.

601.6 *Compliance.* The Energy Use Budget is determined by calculating the annual energy usage for a Reference or Prototype Building that is configured to comply with the provisions of subpart E for such buildings, except that the fuel source(s) of the Prototype or Reference Building shall be the same life cycle cost-effective source(s) selected for the Proposed Design. If the Design Energy Use is less than or equal to the Energy Use Budget then the proposed design complies with these standards.

601.7 This section provides instructions for determining the Design Energy Use and for calculating the Energy Use Budget. The Energy Use Budget is the highest allowable calculated annual energy consumption for a specified building design. Designers are encouraged to design buildings whose Design Energy Use is lower than the Energy Use Budget.
**REGULATORY EVALUATION**

**Directorate Identifier:** 2011

- NM

- 233

- AD

**Executive Order 12866:** Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:** Is the AD significant? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Regulatory Flexibility Act:** Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:** This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. I s it appropriate t o include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? YES ( ) explain NO (X)