alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 30
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 30 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

§ 30.61 Modification and revocation of licenses and registration certificates. ( a ) The terms and conditions of each license and registration certificate issued under the regulations in this part and parts 31 through 36 and 39 of this chapter shall be subject to amendment, revision, or modification by reason of amendments to the Act, or by reason of rules, regulations, and orders issued in accordance with the terms of the Act.
( b ) Any license or registration certificate may be revoked, suspended, or modified, in whole or in part, for any material false statement in the application or in any statement of fact required under section 182 of the Act, or because of conditions revealed by such application or statement of fact or any report, record, or inspection or other means that would warrant the Commission to refuse to grant a license or registration certificate on an original application, or for violation of, or failure to observe any of the terms and provisions of the Act or of any rule, regulation, or order of the Commission.
( c ) Except in cases of willfulness or those in which the public health, interest, or safety requires otherwise, no license or registration certificate shall be modified, suspended, or revoked unless, before the institution of proceedings therefor, facts or conduct that may warrant such action shall have been called to the attention of the licensee or certificate holder in writing and the licensee or certificate holder shall have been given an opportunity to demonstrate or achieve compliance with all lawful requirements.
[77 FR 43690, July 25, 2012]
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

ALMA T. McBROOM, )

)

Plaintiff, )

v. ) CASE NO. 2:06-cv-767-MEF

)

VANESSA GORDON, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

O R D E R

It is hereby ORDERED that this Court's Order dated August 30, 2006 referring this

case to the Magistrate Judge is VACATED.

DONE this 22nd day of March, 2007.

 /s/ Mark E. Fuller 

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00767-MEF-SRW Document 50 Filed 03/22/2007 Page 1 of 1
Editorial Note on Part 37
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 37 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

§ 37.33 Access authorization program review. ( a ) Each licensee shall be responsible for the continuing effectiveness of the access authorization program. Each licensee shall ensure that access authorization programs are reviewed to confirm compliance with the requirements of this subpart and that comprehensive actions are taken to correct any noncompliance that is identified. The review program shall evaluate all program performance objectives and requirements. Each licensee shall periodically (at least annually) review the access program content and implementation.
( b ) The results of the reviews, along with any recommendations, must be documented. Each review report must identify conditions that are adverse to the proper performance of the access authorization program, the cause of the condition(s), and, when appropriate, recommend corrective actions, and corrective actions taken. The licensee shall review the findings and take any additional corrective actions necessary to preclude repetition of the condition, including reassessment of the deficient areas where indicated.
( c ) Review records must be maintained for 3 years.
|   | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership. |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   | /s/ Kristian B. Kos                                                                                                    |   |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |   | Kristian B. KosChief Executive OfficerNew Source Energy GP, LLC(as general partner of New Source Energy Partners L.P.) |   |

|   |   | /s/ Richard D. Finley                                                                                                    |   |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |   | Richard D. FinleyChief Financial OfficerNew Source Energy GP, LLC(as general partner of New Source Energy Partners L.P.) |   |
823.303-70 Contract clause.

Contracting officers shall insert clause 852.223-71, Safety and Health, in solicitations and contracts

that involve hazardous materials for the following types of requirements:

(a) Research, development, or test projects.

(b) Transportation of hazardous materials.

(c) Construction.

Parent topic: Subpart 823.3 - Hazardous Material Identification and Material Safety Data
Subpart 2836.2 - Special Aspects of Contracting for Construction    **Parent topic:** PART 2836 - CONSTRUCTION AND ARCHITECT-ENGINEER CONTRACTS2836.204 Disclosure in solicitations of the magnitude of construction projects.       For construction projects over $10,000,000, present the magnitude in ranges as follows:          (a) Between $10,000,001 and $25,000,000;          (b) Between $25,000,001 and $100,000,000;          (c) Between $100,000,001 and $250,000,000;          (d) Between $250,000,001 and $500,000,000; and          (e) Over $500,000,000.
PGI 225.870-5 Contract administration.       (1) Assign contract administration in accordance with DFARS Part 242. When the Defense Contract Management Agency will perform contract administration in Canada, name in the contract the following payment office for disbursement of DoD funds (DoD Department Code: 17-Navy; 21-Army; 57-Air Force; 97-all other DoD components), whether payment is in Canadian or U.S. dollars:          DFAS Columbus Center                         DFAS-CO/North Entitlement Operations                         PO Box 182266                         Columbus, OH 43218-2266.(2) The following procedures apply to cost-reimbursement type contracts:          (i) The PWGSC automatically arranges audits on contracts with the Canadian Commercial Corporation. Upon advice from PWGSC, the Canadian Commercial Corporation certifies the invoice and forwards it with Standard Form (SF) 1034, Public Voucher, to the administrative contracting officer for further processing and transmittal to the disbursing office.          (ii) For contracts placed directly with Canadian firms, the administrative contracting officer requests audits from the PWGSC, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. Route requests for audit of non-Canadian Commercial Corporation contracts and subcontracts with Canadian contractors through the cognizant contract management office of the Defense Contract Management Agency.          (A) Within 25 days of the date of the audit request, PWGSC will provide—          An acknowledgement of receipt form;          An estimate of completion form; and          (*3*) A single point of contact to report the status of audit requests and the progress of audits.          (B) Audits will be completed within 24 months of the requested date for post-award audits.          (C) PWGSC will provide information to support the determination that the price is fair and reasonable.          (D) The PWGSC—          (*1*) Approves invoices on a provisional basis pending completion of the contract and final audit;          (*2*) Forwards these invoices, accompanied by SF 1034, Public Voucher, to the administrative contracting officer for further processing and transmittal to the disbursing officer; and          (*3*) Furnishes periodic advisory audit reports directly to the administrative contracting officer.          (A) Approves invoices on a provisional basis pending completion of the contract and final audit;          (B) Forwards these invoices, accompanied by SF 1034, Public Voucher, to the administrative contracting officer for further processing and transmittal to the disbursing officer; and          (C) Furnishes periodic advisory audit reports directly to the administrative contracting officer.    **Parent topic:** PGI 225.870 Contracting with Canadian contractors.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         794,449
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,784
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,379,696
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,245,214
<PP&E>                                          34,097
<DEPRECIATION>                                  23,822
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,255,689
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          169,040
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,086,649
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,255,689
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,379,814
<CGS>                                        1,075,801
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,075,801
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               505,407
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 793
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (202,187)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (202,187)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (202,187)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
###### Editorial Note on Part 2

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

#### § 2.300 Scope of subpart C.

The provisions of this subpart apply to all adjudications conducted under the authority of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, the Energy Reorganization Act of 1974, and 10 CFR Part 2, unless specifically stated otherwise in this subpart.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

 v. ) CR. NO. 1:06cr197-MEF

) 

RODERICK CHARLES MELVIN )

O R D E R

Upon consideration of the motion for writ of habeas corpus ad prosequendum filed August

24, 2006, and for good cause shown, it is

ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED. The Clerk of this Court is hereby DIRECTED

to issue a WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS AD PROSEQUENDUM addressed to Easterling

Correctional Facility, Clio, Alabama, commanding them to deliver Roderick Charles Melvin, to any

United States Marshal or Deputy United States Marshal, and directing said Marshal or Deputy to

bring said prisoner before this court, to be held at Montgomery, Alabama, on September 27, 2006,

at 10:00 a.m., and to return the prisoner to said official when the court shall have finished with him.

Done this 25 day of August, 2006. th

 /s/Charles S. Coody 

CHARLES S. COODY

CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:06-cr-00197-MEF-CSC Document 5 Filed 08/25/2006 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 35.2

[First Republic Bank Logo]

Feb 28, 2017

Servicer Compliance Statement

For SEMT 2012-6 (see Schedule A)

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of First Republic Bank (the Servicer),
does hereby certify that:



| | (i) | a review of the Servicers activities during the reporting period from January 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016 and of its performance under the Agreement (as defined on Schedule A attached hereto) from
the above referenced trust during such period has been made under such officers supervision, and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | to the best of such officers knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under this Agreement in all material respects throughout such reporting period.
| | ---- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



First Republic BankBy:

/s/ Ron TremblayName:

Ron TremblayTitle:

Vice President of Residential LendingDate:

Feb. 28, 2017




---

<for SEMT 2012-6>

SCHEDULE A



| | 1. | Flow Mortgage Loan Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of July 1, 2010, between Redwood Residential Acquisition Corporation and First Republic Bank, as modified by the Reconstitution Agreement dated
November 30, 2012 (the Agreement).
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
§ 955.44 Excess funds. If, at the end of a fiscal period, the assessments collected are in excess of expenses incurred, such excess shall be accounted for as follows: ( a ) The committee, with the approval of the Secretary, may establish an operating reserve and may carry over to subsequent fiscal periods excess funds in a reserve so established, except funds in the reserve shall not exceed the equivalent of approximately three fiscal periods' budgeted expenses. Such reserve funds may be used: ( 1 ) To defray any expenses authorized under this part;
( 2 ) To defray expenses during any fiscal period prior to the time assessment income is sufficient to cover such expenses;
( 3 ) To cover deficits incurred during any fiscal period when assessment income is less than expenses;
( 4 ) To defray expenses incurred during any period when any or all provisions of this part are suspended or are inoperative; and
( 5 ) To cover necessary expenses of liquidation in the event of termination of this part. Upon termination of this part, any funds not required to defray the necessary expenses of liquidation shall be disposed of in such manner as the Secretary may determine to be appropriate except that to the extent practicable, such funds shall be returned pro rata to the persons from whom such funds were collected.
( b ) If such excess is not retained in a reserve as provided in paragraph (a) of this section, each handler entitled to a proportionate refund of the excess assessments collected shall be credited at the end of a fiscal period with such refund against the operations of the following fiscal period unless such handler demands payment thereof, in which event such proportionate refund shall be paid.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

NORTHERN DIVISION

ALMA T. McBROOM, *

PLAINTIFF *

VS. * CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:06 CV767-F

JOHN E. POTTER, POSTMASTER *

GENERAL UNITED STATES POSTAL *

SERVICE; NATIONAL POSTAL *

MAIL HANDLERS UNION; THE *

MONTGOMERY ALABAMA AREA *

LOCAL AMERICAN POSTAL WORKERS *

UNION, AFL-CIO; and VANESSA *

GORDON, *

DEFENDANTS *

INTERROGATORIES AND REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION

COMES NOW Defendant, CONNIE FREEMAN by and through 

counsel and propounds the following Discovery Request on 

Plaintiff: 

1. State your full name, address, social security 

number, and date of birth.

2. Please state the full name and complete address of 

all treating physicians who have found, treated, 

and diagnosed you to be disabled as alleged in your 

Complaint.

3. Please state why it took you until March 30, 2006 

to “discover” a grievance has allegedly not been 

filed by the Local Union.

Case 2:06-cv-00767-MEF-SRW Document 59 Filed 03/29/2007 Page 1 of 3
4. Please state by what authority the Local Union is 

required to file a grievance on your behalf.

5. Please provide all jobs you have held for the last 

10 years by name, complete address and reason for 

leaving.

6. Please state whether you have ever been convicted 

of a crime.

7. Please state why you have ever previously been a 

Plaintiff or Defendant in a lawsuit and provide the 

name of the case and it’s Case Number along with 

when and where it was filed.

REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION

1. Please provide all documents that would support 

your claim of total disability as alleged in your 

complaint.

2. Please provide all documents that support your 

claim that the Local Union failed to pursue a 

grievance on your behalf.

3/29/07 /s/ William P. Roberts, II

DATE SIGNATURE OF COUNSEL

COUNSEL FOR:

CONNIE FREEMAN

HOWELL, SARTO & HOWELL

P.O. Box 681864

147 E. Main St.

Prattville, AL 36068-1864

(334)365-2286

Case 2:06-cv-00767-MEF-SRW Document 59 Filed 03/29/2007 Page 2 of 3
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that I have served a copy of the 

foregoing upon the following by U. S. Mail, first class, 

postage pre-paid and through the Court’s electronic filing 

system: 

Debrorah Nicknson

2820 Fairlane Drive, A-10

Montgomery, AL 36116

Brenda C. Zwack 

O’DONNELL, SCHWARTZ, & ANDERSON, P.C.

1300 L. Street NW, Suite 1200

Washington, DC 20005-4126

Patrick Nakamura 

NAKAMURA, QUINN & WALLS LLP 

2204 Lakeshore Drive, Suite 130

Birmingham, AL 35209

Dated: March 29, 2007 /s/ William P. Roberts, II

Case 2:06-cv-00767-MEF-SRW Document 59 Filed 03/29/2007 Page 3 of 3
§ 455.61 Eligibility. To be eligible to receive financial assistance for a technical assistance program, an applicant must: ( a ) Be a school, hospital, unit of local government, public care institution, or coordinating agency representing them except that financial assistance for units of local government and public care institutions will be provided only for buildings which are owned and primarily occupied by offices or agencies of a unit of local government or public care institution and which are not intended for seasonal use and not utilized primarily as a school or hospital eligible for assistance under this program;
( b ) Be located in a State which has an approved State Plan as described in subpart B of this part;
( c ) Have conducted an energy audit or an energy use evaluation required pursuant to § 455.20(k) and adequate to estimate energy conservation potential for the building for which financial assistance is to be requested, subsequent to the most recent construction, reconfiguration, or utilization change which significantly modified energy use within the building;
( d ) If an energy audit has been performed, give assurance that it has implemented all energy conservation maintenance and operating procedures required pursuant to § 455.20(k) or provide a written justification for not implementing them pursuant to § 455.20(l)(3); and
( e ) Submit an application in accordance with the provisions of this part and the approved State Plan.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, EASTERN DIVISION

CLARENCE GLENN, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

v. ) 3:06cv789-MHT

) 

MARCIA MONTGOMERY, )

)

Defendant. )

 RULE 26(F) ORDER

The parties are reminded of the obligation, imposed

by Rule 26(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, to

confer and to develop a proposed discovery plan.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Rule 26(f) report

containing the discovery plan shall be filed as soon as

practicable but not later than September 27, 2006.

The longstanding practice in this district is that

dispositive motions shall be filed no later than 90 days

prior to the pretrial date. If the parties seek to vary

from that schedule, they should present, in the plan,

Case 3:06-cv-00789-MHT-CSC Document 2 Filed 09/13/2006 Page 1 of 3
2

specific case-related reasons for the requested variance.

In their Rule 26(f) report, however, the parties should

assume that the 90-day requirement will apply.

This case will be set for trial before the

undersigned judge during one of that judge's regularly

scheduled civil trial terms, within 7 to 10 months of

this order if a term is available and, if not available,

then as soon as possible thereafter. The pretrial date

is normally set within four to six weeks of a scheduled

trial term. The dates of each judge's civil trial terms

are available on the court's website located at

<http://almd.uscourts.gov> in the civil case information

section.

The court may or may not hold a scheduling conference

before issuing a scheduling order. If the court holds a

scheduling conference, counsel may participate in the

scheduling conference by conference call.

The scheduling order entered by the court will follow

the form of the Uniform Scheduling Order adopted by the

Case 3:06-cv-00789-MHT-CSC Document 2 Filed 09/13/2006 Page 2 of 3
judges of this court. The Uniform Scheduling Order is

also available on the court's website.

The report of the parties should comply with Form 35

of the Appendix of Forms to the Federal Rules of Civil

Procedure.

DONE, this the 13th day of September, 2006.

 /s/ Myron H. Thompson 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-00789-MHT-CSC Document 2 Filed 09/13/2006 Page 3 of 3
#### FOLAND, Appellant, v. GOULD, Respondent, et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

June 19, 1914.)

Action by Russell Foland, suing etc., against George J. Gould, impleaded with others.

G. S. Daniels, of New York City, for appellant.

R. B. Knowles, of New York City, for respondent.

No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements, with leave to plaintiff to amend on payment of costs. Order filed. See, also, 148 N. Y. Supp. 1115.
§ 205.372 Filing procedures; number of copies. An original and two conformed copies of the applications and reports required under §§ 205.370 through 205.379 shall be filed with the Division of Power Supply and Reliability, Department of Energy. Copies of all documents also shall be served on: ( a ) The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission;
( b ) Any State Regulatory Agency having responsibility for service standards, or rates of the “entities” that are affected by the requested order;
( c ) Each “entity” suggested as a potential source for the requested emergency assistance;
( d ) Any “entity” that may be a potential supplier of transmission services;
( e ) All other “entities” not covered under paragraphs (c) and (d) of this section which may be directly affected by the requested order; and
( f ) The appropriate Regional Reliability Council.