Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 241 / Thursday, December 16, 2010 / Notices 78721 

sources and effects of nonsampling error 

on the NSDUH estimates. Particular 

attention will be given to minimizing 

the impact of design changes so that 

survey data continue to remain 

comparable over time. If these tests 

provide successful results, current 

procedures or data collection 

instruments may be revised. 

The number of respondents to be 

included in each field test will vary, 

depending on the nature of the subject 

being tested and the target population. 

However, the total estimated response 

burden is 8,251 hours. The exact 

number of subjects and burden hours for 

each test are unknown at this time, but 

will be clearly outlined in each 

individual submission. The table below, 

however, describes the anticipated 

burden for each of the major testing 

activities for which generic approval is 

being tested. 

ESTIMATED BURDEN FOR NSDUH METHODOLOGICAL FIELD TESTS

Activity Number of 

respondents 

Responses 

per 

respondent 

Total number 

of responses 

Average 

burden per 

response (hrs.) 

Total burden 

(hrs.) 

a. Focus Groups ................................................................ 270 1 270 2 .0 540 

b. Cognitive laboratory testing ........................................... 200 1 200 1 .0 200 

c. Field Tests ..................................................................... 6,600 1 6,600 1 .0 6,600 

d. Customer Satisfaction Surveys ..................................... 300 1 300 0 .25 75 

Household screening for c ................................................. 8,910 1 8,910 0 .083 740 

Screening Verification for c ................................................ 445 1 445 0 .067 30 

Interview Verification for c ................................................. 990 1 990 0 .067 66 

Total ............................................................................ 17,715 ........................ 17,715 .......................... 8,251 

Annual Average (Total divided by 3 years) ....................... 5,905 ........................ 5,905 .......................... 2,750 

Written comments and 

recommendations concerning the 

proposed information collection should 

be sent by January 18, 2011 to: 

SAMHSA Desk Officer, Human 

Resources and Housing Branch, Office 

of Management and Budget, New 

Executive Office Building, Room 10235, 

Washington, DC 20503; due to potential 

delays in OMB’s receipt and processing 

of mail sent through the U.S. Postal 

Service, respondents are encouraged to 

submit comments by fax to: 202–395– 

7285. 

Dated: December 1, 2010. 

Elaine Parry, 

Director, Office of Management, Technology 

and Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2010–31585 Filed 12–15–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4162–20–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES 

Substance Abuse and Mental Health 

Services Administration 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities: Submission for OMB 

Review; Comment Request 

Periodically, the Substance Abuse and 

Mental Health Services Administration 

(SAMHSA) will publish a summary of 

information collection requests under 

OMB review, in compliance with the 

Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 

Chapter 35). To request a copy of these 

documents, call the SAMHSA Reports 

Clearance Officer on (240) 276–1243. 

Project: Screening, Brief Intervention, 

Brief Treatment and Referral to 

Treatment (SBIRT) Cross-Site 

Evaluation—New 

SAMHSA is conducting a cross-site 

external evaluation of the impact of 

programs of screening, brief 

intervention (BI), brief treatment (BT) 

and referral to treatment on patients 

presenting at various health care 

delivery units with a continuum of 

severity of substance use. SAMHSA’s 

SBIRT program is a cooperative 

agreement grant program designed to 

help States and Tribal Councils expand 

the continuum of care available for 

substance misuse and use disorders. 

The program includes screening, brief 

intervention, brief treatment and 

referrals to treatment for persons at risk 

for dependence on alcohol or drugs. The 

cross-site evaluation will provide a 

comprehensive assessment of the effects 

of SBIRT on patient outcomes, 

performance site practices, and 

treatment systems. This information 

will allow SAMHSA to determine the 

extent to which SBIRT has met its 

objectives of implementing a 

comprehensive system of identification 

and care to meet the needs of 

individuals at all points along the 

substance use continuum. 

A paper and pencil survey will be 

administered to practitioners in sites 

where SBIRT services are being 

delivered. The practitioner survey is 

designed to evaluate the 

implementation of proposed SBIRT 

models by measuring their penetration 

and practitioners’ willingness to adopt. 

Furthermore, the survey will document 

moderating factors related to 

practitioner and health care delivery 

unit characteristics. 

The 93 question practitioner survey 

includes collection of demographic 

information as well as questions that 

attempt to assess barriers to 

implementation encountered by the 

practitioners and to gauge the 

effectiveness of the training they 

received. These measures were 

developed and used by Babor et al. 

(2005) in their comparable study 

comparing different implementation 

strategies for primary care screening and 

brief intervention programs for 

hazardous and harmful drinkers. The 

practitioner survey also includes an 

instrument developed by Panzano and 

Roth (2006) to measures an 

organization’s willingness to adopt new 

innovative practices. 

TOTAL BURDEN HOURS FOR THE CROSS-SITE PATIENT SURVEY

Instrument/activity Number of 

respondents 

Responses 

per 

respondent 

Hours per 

response 

Total burden 

hours Hourly wage 

Total 

respondent 

cost a

Practitioner Survey ................................... 1,075 1 .30 322.5 $32 $10,320 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
78722 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 241 / Thursday, December 16, 2010 / Notices 

Written comments and 

recommendations concerning the 

proposed information collection should 

be sent by January 18, 2011 to: 

SAMHSA Desk Officer, Human 

Resources and Housing Branch, Office 

of Management and Budget, New 

Executive Office Building, Room 10235, 

Washington, DC 20503; due to potential 

delays in OMB’s receipt and processing 

of mail sent through the U.S. Postal 

Service, respondents are encouraged to 

submit comments by fax to: 202–395– 

5806. 

Dated: December 6, 2010. 

Elaine Parry, 

Director, Office of Management, Technology 

and Operations. 

[FR Doc. 2010–31586 Filed 12–15–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4162–20–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

SECURITY 

Coast Guard 

[Docket No. USCG–2010–1104] 

Intent To Prepare Programmatic 

Environmental Assessment Statement 

for the Nationwide Implementation of 

the Interagency Operations Centers 

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS. 

ACTION: Notice of intent and request for 

comments. 

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard announces 

its intent to prepare a Programmatic 

Environmental Assessment (PEA) for 

the proposed nationwide 

implementation of the Interagency 

Operations Centers (IOC) Project and 

requests public comments on the scope 

of the PEA. 

DATES: Comments and related material 

must either be submitted to our online 

docket via http://www.regulations.gov 

on or before January 18, 2011 or reach 

the Docket Management Facility by that 

date. 

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments 

identified by docket number USCG– 

2010–1104 using any one of the 

following methods: 

(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal: 

http://www.regulations.gov. 

(2) Fax: 202–493–2251. 

(3) Mail: Docket Management Facility 

(M–30), U.S. Department of 

Transportation, West Building Ground 

Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey 

Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590– 

0001. 

(4) Hand delivery: Same as mail 

address above, between 9 a.m. and 5 

p.m., Monday through Friday, except 

Federal holidays. The telephone number 

is 202–366–9329. 

To avoid duplication, please use only 

one of these four methods. See the 

‘‘Public Participation and Request for 

Comments’’ portion of the 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section 

below for instructions on submitting 

comments. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If 

you have questions on this notice, 

please contact CAPT Alan Arsenault, 

Coast Guard, telephone 202–475–3717 

or e-mail alan.n.arsenault@uscg.mil. If 

you have questions on viewing or 

submitting material to the docket, call 

Renee V. Wright, Program Manager, 

Docket Operations, telephone 202–366– 

9826. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Public Participation and Request for 

Comments 

We encourage you to submit 

comments and related material on the 

scope of this PEA. Specifically, the 

Coast Guard requests input on any 

environmental concerns that the public 

may have related to the development of 

IOCs throughout the United States, 

sources of relevant data or information, 

and any suggested analysis methods for 

inclusion in the PEA. All comments 

received will be posted, without change, 

to http://www.regulations.gov and will 

include any personal information you 

have provided. 

Submitting comments: If you submit a 

comment, please include the docket 

number for this notice (USCG–2010– 

1104) and provide a reason for each 

suggestion or recommendation. You 

may submit your comments and 

material online, or by fax, mail or hand 

delivery, but please use only one of 

these means. We recommend that you 

include your name and a mailing 

address, an e-mail address, or a 

telephone number in the body of your 

document so that we can contact you if 

we have questions regarding your 

submission. 

To submit your comment online, go to 

http://www.regulations.gov, click on the 

‘‘submit a comment’’ box, which will 

then become highlighted in blue. In the 

‘‘Document Type’’ drop down menu 

select ‘‘Notices’’ and insert ‘‘USCG– 

2010–1104’’ in the ‘‘Keyword’’ box. Click 

‘‘Search’’ then click on the balloon shape 

in the ‘‘Actions’’ column. If you submit 

your comments by mail or hand 

delivery, submit them in an unbound 

format, no larger than 81⁄2 by 11 inches, 

suitable for copying and electronic 

filing. If you submit them by mail and 

would like to know that they reached 

the Facility, please enclose a stamped, 

self-addressed postcard or envelope. We 

will consider all comments and material 

received during the comment period. 

Viewing the comments: To view the 

comments, go to http:// 

www.regulations.gov, click on the ‘‘read 

comments’’ box, which will then 

become highlighted in blue. In the 

‘‘Keyword’’ box insert ‘‘USCG–2010– 

1104’’ and click ‘‘Search.’’ Click the 

‘‘Open Docket Folder’’ in the ‘‘Actions’’ 

column. If you do not have access to the 

Internet, you may view the docket 

online by visiting the Docket 

Management Facility in Room W12–140 

on the ground floor of the Department 

of Transportation West Building, 1200 

New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, 

DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., 

Monday through Friday, except Federal 

holidays. We have an agreement with 

the Department of Transportation to use 

the Docket Management Facility. 

Privacy Act: Anyone can search the 

electronic form of comments received 

into any of our dockets by the name of 

the individual submitting the comment 

(or signing the comment, if submitted 

on behalf of an association, business, 

labor union, etc.). You may review a 

Privacy Act system of records notice 

regarding our public dockets in the 

January 17, 2008, issue of the Federal 

Register (73 FR 3316). 

Background and Purpose 

SAFE Port Act and the IOC Project 

The Security and Accountability for 

Every Port Act of 2006 (SAFE Port Act), 

Public Law 109–347, 120 Stat. 1884, 

was enacted to improve maritime and 

United States port security through 

enhanced layered defenses. Section 108 

of the SAFE Port Act directs the 

establishment of IOCs at all high 

priority ports that ‘‘utilize, as 

appropriate, the compositional and 

operations characteristics of existing 

centers’’ and are ‘‘organized to fit the 

security needs, requirements, and 

resources of the individual port area at 

which each is operating.’’ 

The Coast Guard IOC Project will 

satisfy this mandate through the 

development and transformation of 

approximately 35 existing Coast Guard 

Sector Command Centers (SCCs) over 

the next 12 years into coordinated 

planning and operations centers. 

Purpose of the IOC Project 

The purpose of the proposed 

nationwide implementation of the IOC 

Project is to improve unity of effort 

among Federal, State, tribal, and local 

port partners with shared port security 

responsibilities by providing 

interagency command and control 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES