U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE

WASHINGTON : 

1 

59–118 

" ! SENATE 109TH CONGRESS

2d Session 

TREATY DOC. 

2006

109–21 

GENEVA ACT OF THE HAGUE AGREEMENT CONCERNING THE INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION OF 

INDUSTRIAL DESIGNS 

MESSAGE 

FROM

THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES 

TRANSMITTING

THE GENEVA ACT OF THE HAGUE AGREEMENT CONCERNING THE 

INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION OF INDUSTRIAL DESIGNS (THE 

‘‘AGREEMENT’’), ADOPTED IN GENEVA ON JULY 2, 1999, AND 

SIGNED BY THE UNITED STATES ON JULY 6, 1999 

NOVEMBER 13, 2006.—Treaty was read the first time, and together with 

the accompanying papers, referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations and order to be printed for the use of the Senate 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARINGE:\Seals\Congress.#13

ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARING
(III)

LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL 

THE WHITE HOUSE, November 13, 2006. 

To the Senate of the United States: 

With a view to receiving the advice and consent of the Senate to 

ratification, I transmit herewith the Geneva Act of the Hague 

Agreement Concerning the International Registration of Industrial 

Designs (the ‘‘Agreement’’), adopted in Geneva on July 2, 1999, and 

signed by the United States on July 6, 1999. I also transmit, for 

the information of the Senate, a report of the Department of State 

with respect to the Agreement. 

This Agreement promotes the ability of U.S. design owners to 

protect their industrial designs by allowing them to obtain multinational design protection through a single deposit procedure. 

Under the Agreement, U.S. design owners would be able to file for 

design registration in any number of the Contracting Parties with 

a single standardized application in English at either the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office or at the International Bureau of the 

World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). Similarly, renewal of a design registration in each Contracting Party may be 

made by filing a single request along with payment of the appropriate fees at the International Bureau of WIPO. This Agreement 

should make access to international protection of industrial designs 

more readily available to U.S. businesses. 

In the event that the Senate provides its consent to ratify the 

Agreement, the United States would not deposit its instrument of 

ratification until the necessary implementing legal structure has 

been established domestically. 

I recommend that the Senate give early and favorable consideration to this Agreement and give its advice and consent to its ratification, subject to the declarations described in the accompanying 

report of the Department of State. 

GEORGE W. BUSH. 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARING

ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARING
(V)

LETTER OF SUBMITTAL 

DEPARTMENT OF STATE, 

Washington, April 14, 2006. 

The PRESIDENT, 

The White House. 

THE PRESIDENT: I have the honor hereby to submit to you, with 

a view to its transmittal to the Senate for advice and consent to 

ratification, the Geneva Act of the Hague Agreement Concerning 

the International Registration of Industrial Designs (hereinafter 

the ‘‘Agreement’’), adopted at Geneva, July 2, 1999. This treaty was 

adopted under the auspices of the World Intellectual Property Organization (‘‘WIPO’’) with the objective of simplifying the process of 

seeking protection for designs in multiple countries. 

The Agreement traces its roots to the Hague Agreement Concerning the International Deposit of Industrial Designs done at The 

Hague, Netherlands, on November 6, 1925, which entered into 

force in 1928, and was revised numerous times. For the 42 current 

member states of the Hague Union, these existing agreements facilitate the obtainment of intellectual property protection for industrial designs by allowing multinational patent protection in a number of countries through a single ‘‘international deposit’’ procedure. 

However, these Acts did not meet the needs of nations, such as the 

United States, that review each application individually. This 

Agreement allows the United States to partake in the benefits of 

facilitating multinational design protection for applicants while 

continuing its system of individual review. 

The Department of Commerce and the Office of the United 

States Trade Representative join the Department of State in requesting that the Geneva Act of the Hague Agreement Concerning 

the International Registration of Industrial Designs be transmitted 

to the Senate for its advice and consent to ratification as soon as 

possible, subject to the declarations described in the enclosed document. 

Respectfully submitted. 

CONDOLEEZZA RICE. 

Enclosure: Key Provisions of the Geneva Act of the Hague Agreement Concerning the International Registration of Industrial Designs. 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARING
(VI)

KEY PROVISIONS OF THE GENEVA ACT OF THE HAGUE AGREEMENT

CONCERNING THE INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION OF INDUSTRIAL

DESIGNS

THE OPERATION OF THE TREATY

The Agreement will permit a U.S. design applicant to file for protection in any of the Contracting Parties, including the United 

States, by filing a single standardized application in English. Pursuant to Articles 3 and 4( 1) of the Agreement, any person who is 

a national of or is domiciled in the United States may file an international design application with the United States Patent and 

Trademark Office (USPTO) or directly with the International Bureau (IB) of the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). 

The filing date of the international design application is the date 

that the application is received by either the IB or the USPTO (Article 9(1) and Rule 13(3)). 

The USPTO must transmit any application to the IB within one 

month from the date on which the USPTO receives it. If, however, 

a security clearance is required by law, then the USPTO can notify 

the Director General of WIPO (Director General) as to this fact, 

and the USPTO has six months to transmit the application to the 

lB. 

Article 5(1) sets forth the mandatory requirements as to the contents of an international design application. Article 5(2) provides 

additional mandatory contents as to Contracting Parties that have 

an intellectual property office that is an Examining Office, such as 

the USPTO. 

The Agreement also provides a basis for rights of priority with 

regard to international design applications filed under the Agreement. Article 6(1) states that the application may contain a declaration under Article 4 of the Paris Convention for the Protection 

of Industrial Property (1967) claiming the priority of one or more 

earlier applications filed in or for any country party to the Paris 

Convention or any member of the World Trade Organization. Article 6(2) provides that an international design application is 

deemed, as from its filing date and regardless of its subsequent 

fate, equivalent to a regular filing within the meaning of Article 4 

of the Paris Convention. Thereby, international design applications 

under the Agreement may serve as a basis for claiming priority in 

a national or regional application. 

Article 7 states that the fees shall include a designation fee for 

each designated Contracting Party. However, any Contracting 

Party, such as the United States, whose Office is an Examining Office, may declare that the prescribed designation fees be replaced 

by an individual designation fee, which may be payable in two 

parts. 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARING
VII

According to Article 10(1) and Rule 15 of the Agreement, the IB 

will register each design that is the subject of an international design application immediately upon receipt by the IB of the application. The general rule under Article 10(2) is that the date of the 

international registration will be the filing date of the application, 

provided it is complete and complies with the mandatory requirements of the Agreement. Pursuant to Article 9(3) and Rule 14, if 

the application contains any of the following missing parts or irregularities, the date of the international registration is the date on 

which the correction is received by the IB: (1) the application is not 

in a prescribed language (English or French); (2) the application 

lacks any indication that registration under the Agreement is 

sought; (3) the application is missing indications allowing the identity of the applicant to be established; (4) the application lacks a 

reproduction, or a specimen, as required; or (5) the application does 

not contain the designation of at least one Contracting Party. If an 

irregularity is discovered other than the five listed above, the international registration date is the filing date, provided that the irregularity is corrected within the prescribed time limit of three 

months. If not corrected within the time limit, the application is 

considered abandoned. However, pursuant to Article 8(2)(b), if the 

irregularity relates to additional elements that may be required by 

an Examining Office, or to a special requirement notified to the Director General by a Contracting Party, and the applicant has not 

complied within the prescribed time limit of three months, the application is merely deemed not to contain the designation of the 

concerned Contracting Party. 

In accordance with Article 10(3) and Rule 17, the IB will normally publish the international registration within six months of 

the registration date, unless the applicant requests that the publication be made immediately after the registration. Article 11 (1) 

and Rule 16( 1) provide that applicants may also request deferment 

of publication, which shall be granted for a period of less than 30 

months from the filing date if such deferment is allowed by the 

laws of all the Contracting Parties designated in an application. 

Article 11 (1)(b) provides that where a Contracting Party does not 

provide for the deferment of the publication of an industrial design, 

as is the case in the United States, the Contracting Party shall notify the Director General of that fact in a declaration. 

Pursuant to Article 12( 1), the USPTO may refuse registration, 

in whole or in part, of the international registration, when the conditions for the grant of protection under the laws of the United 

States are not met. Under Article 12(2), the refusal shall be communicated by the USPTO to the IB within the prescribed period of 

six months from the date on which the IB sends to the USPTO a 

copy of the publication of the international registration, as set forth 

in Rule 18(1)(a). However, the USPTO, as an Examining Office, 

may notify the Director General that the period for refusal for the 

United States shall be 12 months. 

According to Article 14(2) and Rule 18(1), if the USPTO does not 

communicate a notification of refusal, the international registration 

will have the same effect as a grant of protection for the industrial 

design under the laws of the United States at the latest on the last 

day of the period in which USPTO could have transmitted a notice 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARING
VIII

of refusal to the IB. However, if the USPTO unintentionally does 

not communicate a notice of refusal within that time period, the 

USPTO may notify the IB and communicate the decision to the 

holder of the international registration promptly thereafter (Rule 

18(1)(c)(ii)). 

Article 14(1) provides that the international registration has the 

same effect in the USPTO as a regularly-filed application for the 

grant of protection of the design under U.S. law. The applicant has 

the same remedies as if the design had been the subject of a U.S. 

national application. Under Article 12(4), the USPTO may withdraw a notification of refusal, in whole or in part, at any time. 

However, in that case, a grant of protection will ensue from the latest date on which the refusal was withdrawn (see Article 14(2)(b)). 

Article 15 provides that invalidation by the competent authorities in a designated Contracting Party may not be pronounced 

without the right holder having, in good time, the opportunity to 

defend his rights. Additionally, in the United States, the USPTO 

must, where it is aware of the invalidation, notify the IB. Article 

16 provides that the IB must record changes of ownership and 

other matters regarding international registrations and that such 

changes are to have the same effect as if the recording had been 

made in the Office of the concerned Contracting Party. 

Pursuant to Article 17, an international registration shall be effected for a term of five years from the date of international registration. Registrations may be renewed for additional terms of five 

years. As long as they are renewed according to Article 17(2), Article 17(3) provides that protection shall not terminate before 15 

years from the date of international registration. Renewal requires 

the payment of fees as specified in Rule 24. 

Article 19 sets forth provisions regarding a common patent office 

being substituted for national offices when a group of member 

states agrees to unify domestic legislation on designs. 

Article 20 of the Agreement provides that the Contracting Parties shall be members of the ‘‘same Union as the States party to 

the 1934 Act or the 1960 Act,’’ and Article 21(1) of the Act provides 

that the Contracting Parties shall be members ‘‘of the same Assembly as the States bound by Article 2 of the Complementary Act of 

1967.’’

Article 21(2) sets forth the tasks to be performed by the Assembly. These tasks include: dealing with all matters concerning maintenance and development of the Union and the implementation of 

the Agreement; exercising rights and performing such tasks as are 

specifically conferred upon it or assigned to it under this Agreement or the Complementary Act of 1967; giving directions to the 

Director General concerning preparations for conferences of revision and deciding on the convocation of any such conference; 

amending the Regulations; giving the Director General all necessary instructions concerning matters within the competence of 

the Union; adopting the biennial budget and financial regulations 

of the Union; establishing committees and working groups as appropriate; and determining which States and organizations shall be 

admitted to its meetings as observers. 

Article 21(4) sets forth the general voting procedures in the Assembly. Each Contracting Party that is a state shall have one vote 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARING
IX

and shall vote only in its own name. Any Contracting Party that 

is an intergovernmental organization may vote in place of its member states, with a number of votes equal to the number of its member states that are party to the Agreement, but no such organization may participate in the vote if anyone of its member states exercises its right to vote, and vice versa. 

Article 21(5) provides that subject to Articles 24(2) and 26(2), the 

decisions of the Assembly require two-thirds of the votes cast (abstentions do not count as votes). However, as is common practice 

in multilateral intellectual property treaties that include provisions 

for an assembly to facilitate treaty implementation, certain provisions of the Agreement may be amended by a super-majority of the 

Assembly, without the need for a revision conference. In particular, 

proposals for the adoption of any amendment to Articles 21, 22, 23, 

and 26 may be submitted by any Contracting Party or the Director 

General. Adoption of amendments to those Articles requires a 

three-fourths majority, except that amendments to Articles 21 and 

26(2) shall require a four-fifths majority. Pursuant to Article 26(3), 

any such amendment enters into force one month after the Director 

General receives written notifications of acceptance from threefourths of those Contracting Parties, which, at the time the amendment was adopted, were members of the Assembly and had the 

right to vote on the amendment. Pursuant to Article 26(3)(c), any 

such amendment that enters into force will bind all the States and 

intergovernmental organizations that are Contracting Parties to 

the Agreement. 

Article 22 details the duties of the International Bureau of WIPO 

as they relate to the Agreement. Pursuant to Article 22(5)(c), the 

Director General and persons designated by the Director General 

shall take part, without the right to vote, in discussions at any revision conference. 

Pursuant to Article 23 of the Agreement, the budget of the Union 

will include income and expenses proper to the Union and its contribution to the budget of expenses to the Unions administered by 

WIPO. Its budget will be established with due regard to the requirements of coordination with the budgets of the other WIPO 

Unions. The finances of the Union include a working capital fund, 

established pursuant to Article 23(5), which will be constituted by 

the excess receipts and, if such excess does not suffice, by a single 

payment made by each member of the Union. 

The USPTO is expected to incur some initial costs for items such 

as new forms and other updates of procedures in order to allow for 

appropriate processing of international design applications under 

the Agreement. However, the Agreement authorizes the United 

States to set an individual designation fee payable in two parts 

that will be equivalent to the filing and issue fees currently 

charged with respect to a regular United States design application. 

The substantive requirements of chapter 16 of title 35 of the 

United States Code, which currently defines the substantive requirements for the patenting of designs, will also apply to international design applications. Therefore, these fees should cover the 

cost of processing applications filed under the Agreement. Much of 

the examination of an international design application will be the 

same as that of a regular national application for design patent. 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARING
X

IMPLEMENTING LEGISLATION

In the event that the Senate provides its advice and consent to 

ratify this Agreement, the United States would not deposit its instrument of ratification until the necessary implementing legal 

structure had been established domestically, so as to ensure that 

the United States was capable of complying with the provisions of 

this Agreement. Such implementation requirements include the enactment of legislation, and the promulgation of new regulations by 

the USPTO. 

DECLARATIONS TO ACCOMPANY UNITED STATES RATIFICATION

The Agreement contemplates that Contracting Parties may make 

declarations with respect to certain articles. The Department of 

State recommends that the United States ratification to the Agreement be accompanied by nine declarations, pursuant to Agreement 

Articles 5(2)(a), 7(2), 11(1)(b), 13(1), 16(2), and 17(3)(c), and Agreement Rules 8(1), 13(4) and 18(1)(b). 

The first listed declaration, authorized under Article 5(2)(a), permits the USPTO, as an Examining Office under the Agreement, to 

declare those additional elements listed in Article 5(2)(b), which it 

requires be included in an application for grant of protection of the 

design. Current United States statutes and regulations governing 

the protection of design patents require: indications concerning the 

identity of the creator of the industrial design that is the subject 

of the application (35 U.S.C. 114, 37 CFR 1.63(a)(3)); a brief description of the reproduction or of the characteristic features of the 

industrial design (35 U.S.C. 112, 1st paragraph; 37 CFR 

1.154(b)(5)); and a claim (35 USC 111). In addition, Rule 11(3) of 

the Agreement requires that a Party making a declaration under 

Article 5(2)(a) to the effect that a claim is required must specify in 

its declaration the exact wording of the required claim (as found in 

37 CFR 1.153(a)). 

The USPTO has ascertained that a declaration is necessary to 

ensure that its substantive examination of industrial designs is 

maintained. Accordingly, the Department of State recommends 

that the following declaration be included in the U.S. instrument 

of ratification: 

Pursuant to Article 5(2)(a) and Rule 11(3) of the Agreement, the United States declares that it is an Examining 

Office under the Agreement whose law requires that an 

application for the grant of protection to an industrial design contain: (i) indications concerning the identity of the 

creator of the industrial design that is the subject of the 

application; (ii) a brief description of the reproduction or of 

the characteristic features of the industrial design that is 

the subject of the application; and (iii) a claim. The specific 

wording of the claim shall be in formal terms to the ornamental design for the article (specifying name of article) as 

shown, or as shown and described. 

The second declaration, authorized under Article 7(2), authorizes 

a Party whose office is an Examining Office (such as USPTO) to 

declare that its individual designation fee, whose amount is to be 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARING
XI

indicated in the declaration and can be changed in future declarations, shall replace the designation fee prescribed in the Regulations of the Agreement. In addition, Rule 12(3) provides that a declaration made pursuant to Article 7(2) may also specify that the individual designation fee be payable in two parts. The first part 

would be paid at the time of filing and the second part would be 

paid at a later date determined by the law of the Contracting 

Party. 

The USPTO has determined that such a declaration is necessary 

in order to keep its fees for processing international design applications filed under the Agreement the same as those for regularly 

filed national design applications. Further, it is necessary to have 

the fee payable in two parts in order to maintain USPTO’s current 

fee practice that comprises a filing fee, due at the time of filing of 

the application, and an issue fee, due before the patent is to be 

granted. Accordingly, the Department of State recommends that 

the following declaration be included in the U.S. instrument of ratification: 

Pursuant to Article 7(2) and Rule 12(3) of the Agreement, the United States declares that, as an Examining 

Office under the Agreement, the prescribed designation fee 

referred to in Article 7(1) of the Agreement shall be replaced by an individual designation fee, that is payable in 

a first part at filing and a second part payable upon allowance of the application. The current amount of the designation fee is US$790, payable in a first part of US$330 

at filing and a second part of US$460 upon allowance of 

the application. However, for those entities that qualify for 

‘‘small entity’’ status within the meaning of section 41(h) 

of title 35 of the United States Code and section 3 of the 

Small Business Act, the amount of the individual designation fee is US$395, payable in a first part of US$165 and 

a second part of US$230. In addition, these amounts are 

subject to future changes upon which notification to the 

Director General will be made in future declarations as authorized in Article 7(2) of the Agreement. 

The third declaration, authorized by Article 11(1)(b) of the Agreement, allows the USPTO to notify the Director General that its law 

does not provide for deferment of publications under the Agreement. The USPTO has ascertained that such a declaration is necessary in order to prohibit deferments of publication of international design registrations designating the United States under 

the Agreement. Accordingly, the Department of State recommends 

that the U.S. instrument of ratification be accompanied by the following declaration: 

Pursuant to Article 11(1)(b) of the Agreement, the 

United States declares that the law of the United States 

does not provide for the deferment of the publication of an 

industrial design. 

The fourth declaration, authorized under Article 13(1) of the 

Agreement, authorizes the USPTO to maintain its restriction of allowing only one independent and distinct design to be claimed in 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARING
XII

a single application. The USPTO has ascertained that such a declaration is necessary so that the USPTO may maintain its practice 

of issuing one patent for one design, which is defined by a single 

claim. Accordingly, the Department of State recommends that the 

following declaration be included in the U.S. instrument of ratification: 

Pursuant to Article 13(1) of the Agreement, the United 

States declares that its laws require that only one independent and distinct design may be claimed in a single application. 

The fifth declaration, authorized by Article 16(2) of the Agreement, allows the USPTO to refuse the effect of recordings regarding change of ownership in the international registration until the 

USPTO receives assignment statements or documents. This would 

allow the USPTO to maintain its current practice of requiring that 

a statement to the effect that a conveyance has been made be submitted to the USPTO and be made available to the public. Under 

U.S. patent law, if such an assignment is not recorded within three 

months, the transfer is void against subsequent bona fide purchasers or mortgagees. This protects subsequent purchasers by allowing them to view the contents of any agreement that purports 

to transfer ownership. 

The USPTO has ascertained that such a declaration is necessary 

in order to maintain its current practice of requiring that assignment documents be provided to the USPTO before they are given 

effect. Accordingly, the Department of State recommends that the 

United States instrument of ratification be accompanied by the following declaration: 

Pursuant to Article 16(2) of the Agreement, the United 

States declares that a recording by the International Bureau under Article 16(1)(i) of the Agreement shall not have 

effect in the United States until the USPTO has received 

the statements or documents recorded thereby. 

The sixth declaration is mandated by Article 17(3)(c) of the 

Agreement. That Article requires that each Contracting Party notify the Director General as to the maximum duration of protection 

provided for by its law. Accordingly, the Department of State recommends that the U.S. instrument of ratification be accompanied 

by the following declaration: 

Pursuant to Article 17(3)(c) of the Agreement, the 

United States declares that the maximum duration of protection for designs provided for by its law is 15 years from 

grant. 

The seventh declaration, authorized by Rule 8(1)(a) of the Agreement, allows the USPTO to continue its practice of requiring that 

an application for the protection of an industrial design be filed in 

the name of the creator of the design. In addition, Rule 8(1)(b) 

states that any declaration pursuant to Rule 8(1)(a) specify the 

form and mandatory contents of any statement or document required for the purposes of that rule. 

The USPTO has determined that such a declaration is necessary 

in order to maintain its current examination practice of requiring 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARING
XIII

that the applicant for protection of an industrial design be the creator of that design. Accordingly, the Department of State recommends that the United States instrument of ratification be accompanied by the following declaration: 

Pursuant to Rule 8(1) of the Agreement, the United 

States declares that the law of the United States requires 

that an application for protection of an industrial design 

be filed in the name of the creator of the industrial design. 

The specific form and mandatory contents of a statement 

required for the purposes of Rule 8(2) of the Agreement 

are contained in section 1.63 of title 37 of the Code of Federal Regulations of the United States. 

The eighth declaration, authorized by Rule 13(4) of the Agreement, allows the USPTO to notify the Director General that the 

law of the United States requires a security clearance and that the 

period of one month identified in Rule 13(3) for the Office of a Contracting Party to forward an application to the IB, shall be replaced 

by a period of six months. This will allow for time to complete the 

security review of the applications currently required by 35 U.S.C. 

181, et seq. 

The USPTO has ascertained that a declaration is necessary in 

order to ensure that international design applications can be reviewed for secrecy and security purposes. Accordingly, the Department of State recommends that the following declaration be included in the U.S. instrument of ratification: 

Pursuant to Rule 13(4) of the Agreement, the United 

States declares that the period of one month referred to in 

Rule 13(3) of the Agreement shall be replaced by a period 

of six months as to the United States in light of the security clearance required by United States law. 

The ninth declaration, authorized by Rule 18(1)(b), allows the 

USPTO, as an Examining Office, to notify the Director General 

that the period of six months for notification of refusal referred to 

in Rule 18(1)(a) shall be replaced by a period of 12 months as to 

the United States. The USPTO has ascertained that such a declaration is necessary in order to maintain the integrity of its substantive examination procedures for applications filed under the 

Agreement. Accordingly, the Department of State recommends that 

the following declaration be included in the U.S. instrument of ratification: 

Pursuant to Rule 18(1)(b), the United States declares 

that the period of six months referred to in Rule 18(1)(a) 

of the Agreement shall be replaced by a period of twelve 

months with respect to the United States, as the Office of 

the United States is an Examining Office under the Agreement.’’


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARING

ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARING
(1) 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 1614 here TD21.001
2 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 1615 here TD21.002
3 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 1616 here TD21.003
4 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 1617 here TD21.004
5 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 1618 here TD21.005
6 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 1619 here TD21.006
7 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 1620 here TD21.007
8 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 1621 here TD21.008
9 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 1622 here TD21.009
10 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 1623 here TD21.010
11 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 1624 here TD21.011
12 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 1625 here TD21.012
13 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 1626 here TD21.013
14 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 1627 here TD21.014
15 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 1628 here TD21.015
16 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 1629 here TD21.016
17 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 1630 here TD21.017
18 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 1631 here TD21.018
19 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 1632 here TD21.019
20 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 1633 here TD21.020
21 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 1634 here TD21.021
22 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 1635 here TD21.022
23 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 1636 here TD21.023
24 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 1637 here TD21.024
25 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 1638 here TD21.025
26 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 1639 here TD21.026
27 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 1640 here TD21.027
28 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 1641 here TD21.028
29 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 1642 here TD21.029
30 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 1643 here TD21.030
31 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 1644 here TD21.031
32 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 1645 here TD21.032
33 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 1646 here TD21.033
34 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 1647 here TD21.034
35 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 1648 here TD21.035
36 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 1649 here TD21.036
37 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 1650 here TD21.037
38 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 1651 here TD21.038
39 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 1652 here TD21.039
40 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 1653 here TD21.040
41 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 1654 here TD21.041
42 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 1655 here TD21.042
43 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 1656 here TD21.043
44 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 1657 here TD21.044
45 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 1658 here TD21.045
46 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 1659 here TD21.046
47 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 1660 here TD21.047
48 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 1661 here TD21.048
49 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 1662 here TD21.049
50 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 1663 here TD21.050
51 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 1664 here TD21.051
52 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 1665 here TD21.052
53 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 1666 here TD21.053
54 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 1667 here TD21.054
55 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 1668 here TD21.055
56 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 1669 here TD21.056
57 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 1670 here TD21.057
58 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 1671 here TD21.058
59 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 1672 here TD21.059
60 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 1673 here TD21.060
61 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 1674 here TD21.061
62 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 1675 here TD21.062
63 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 1676 here TD21.063
64 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 1677 here TD21.064
65 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 1678 here TD21.065
66 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 1679 here TD21.066
67 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 1680 here TD21.067
68 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 1681 here TD21.068
69 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 1682 here TD21.069
70 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 1683 here TD21.070
71 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 1684 here TD21.071
72 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 1685 here TD21.072
73 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 1686 here TD21.073
74 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 1687 here TD21.074
75 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 1688 here TD21.075
76 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 1689 here TD21.076
77 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 1690 here TD21.077
78 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 1691 here TD21.078
79 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 1692 here TD21.079
80 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 1693 here TD21.080
81 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 1694 here TD21.081
82 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 1695 here TD21.082
83 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 1696 here TD21.083
84 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 1697 here TD21.084
85 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 1698 here TD21.085
86 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 1699 here TD21.086
87 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 1700 here TD21.087
88 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 1701 here TD21.088
89 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 1702 here TD21.089
90 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 1703 here TD21.090
91 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 1704 here TD21.091
92 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 1705 here TD21.092
93 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 1706 here TD21.093
94 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 1707 here TD21.094
95 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 1708 here TD21.095
96 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 1709 here TD21.096
97 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 1710 here TD21.097
98 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 1711 here TD21.098
99 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 1712 here TD21.099
100 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 1713 here TD21.100
101 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 1714 here TD21.101
102 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 1715 here TD21.102
103 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 1716 here TD21.103
104 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 1717 here TD21.104
105 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 1718 here TD21.105
106 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 1719 here TD21.106
107 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 1720 here TD21.107
108 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 1721 here TD21.108
109 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 1722 here TD21.109
110 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 1723 here TD21.110
111 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 1724 here TD21.111
112 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 1725 here TD21.112
113 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 1726 here TD21.113
114 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 1727 here TD21.114
115 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 1728 here TD21.115
116 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 1729 here TD21.116
117 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 1730 here TD21.117
118 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 1731 here TD21.118
119 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 1732 here TD21.119
120 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 1733 here TD21.120
121 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 1734 here TD21.121
122 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 1735 here TD21.122
123 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 1736 here TD21.123
124 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 1737 here TD21.124
125 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 1738 here TD21.125
126 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 1739 here TD21.126
127 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 1740 here TD21.127
128 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 1741 here TD21.128
129 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 1742 here TD21.129
130 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 1743 here TD21.130
131 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 1744 here TD21.131
132 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 1745 here TD21.132
133 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 1746 here TD21.133
134 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 1747 here TD21.134
135 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 1748 here TD21.135
136 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 1749 here TD21.136
137 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 1750 here TD21.137
138 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 1751 here TD21.138
139 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 1752 here TD21.139
140 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with HEARINGInsert graphic folio 1753/1776 here TD21.140