alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### May A. Laidlaw, Appellant, v. Andrew Freedman Home, Respondent.

Judgment entered June 28, 1968, dismissing the complaint unanimously reversed on the law and the cause remanded for retrial, with costs and" disbursements to abide the event. Plaintiff, a resident at defendant Home, testified that she slipped and fell in her bathroom on her return from luncheon outside the institution; the cause of the fall was said to have been an accumulation of water on the floor, not there before her departure. She was found there by defendant’s employee some hours later. Although no witness testified directly as to how the water came to be- on the floor, it was established through the examination before trial of defendant’s housekeeper that it was the institution’s established practice to clean bathroom floors by wet mopping, using a wring pail, on the samé day each week; that Tuesday, the day of the accident, was that day for plaintiff’s room, that it was the housekeeper’s duty and regular routine to cheek on such cleaning and that she had done so that day about lunch time, finding it to have been cleaned, though she did not know by which of two employees assigned to the task. Such evidence provided a basis for inference at the close of plaintiff’s case, “ viewed in aspect most favorable to plaintiff,” that defendant’s employee negligently cause the condition which brought about plaintiff’s mishap (see *Spett*v. *President Monroe Bldg. Corp.,*19 N Y 2d 203), and the motion to" dismiss was erroneously granted. Plaintiff should have the opportunity to make an untrammeled presentation of her case at a new trial. Concur — Capozzoli, J. P., Tilzer, Markewieh, Nunez and McNally, JJ.
Exhibit 10.35



 Exhibit 10.35 
 Summary of MeadWestvaco Corporation 2010 Annual Incentive Plan under 2005 
 Performance Incentive Plan, as amended 
 Under the MeadWestvaco Corporation Annual
Incentive Plan (the “Plan”), which is a part of the 2005 Performance Incentive Plan, the Compensation and Organization Development Committee (the “Committee”) of the Board of Directors annually awards each executive an annual
incentive award that is payable in cash. The size of each executive officer’s annual award is determined by application of his or her annual incentive target expressed as a percentage of base salary, which the Committee examines annually to
confirm that the target is reasonable when viewed against external competitive market data, peer group and general industry trends. 
 For 2010,
the Committee established a performance-based incentive pool for certain executive officers equal to a designated percentage of actual earnings before interest and tax (“EBIT”) achieved. EBIT is defined as full year net sales less the cost
of goods sold and selling, general and administrative expenses, excluding interest income and expense, corporate income taxes, extraordinary items, discontinued operations, restructuring charges and certain one-time costs and the cumulative effect
of accounting changes. 
 Funding of the performance-based incentive pool under this formula permits the Committee to pay annual cash incentives
to all executive officers based on the attainment of additional key financial and/or operational metrics. These additional objectives for executive officers are also set by the Committee, and generally include such goals as enterprise economic
profit (“EP”), defined as EBIT less the company’s weighted average cost of capital applied to total capital employed, (net debt plus total equity), subject to certain adjustments and EP actions, which include profitable revenue
growth, productivity, selling, general and administrative expense reduction and cash cycle improvement For each of these additional performance objectives, the Committee sets performance driven threshold, target and stretch payout levels reflecting
a suggested payout curve ranging from 50% of the target incentive to 200% of the target incentive. Annual incentives are subject to an individual maximum payout in accordance with the terms of the Plan. The Committee may adjust award values to
reflect progress made towards target performance levels for EP related goals, provided no awards are payable in the event the designated percentage for threshold EBIT (which funds the incentive pool) is not achieved. 
 Annual incentive awards are subject to the company’s Recoupment Policy.
###### Editorial Note on Subpart A of Part 989

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 989 appear at 83 FR 53973, Oct. 26, 2018.

#### § 989.9 Packed raisins.

*Packed raisins* means raisins which have been stemmed, graded, sorted, cleaned, or seeded, and placed in any container customarily used in the marketing of raisins or in any container suitable or usable for such marketing. Raisins in the process of being packed or raisins which are partially packed shall be subject to the same requirements as packed raisins.
Exhibit 32.1
  CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
  I, Leslie
J. Kessler, Chief Executive Officer of PureSafe Water Systems, Inc. (the
“Registrant”), hereby certify that the Form 10-Q of PureSafe Water Systems, Inc.
for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2009 (the “Report”) fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, and the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Registrant.
 
 Date:  May
      20, 2009Leslie
      J. KesslerPresident
      and Chief Executive
Officer
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATIONS

Pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350



The undersigned hereby certifies that
(i) the foregoing quarterly report on Form 10-Q filed by Fountain Powerboat Industries, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ended September 30, 2005, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in that Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                        |  |                                      
|----------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: November 10, 2005 |  | /s/ Reginald M. Fountain, Jr.        
|                        |  | Reginald M. Fountain, Jr.            
|                        |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|                        | 
|Date: November 10, 2005 |  | /s/ Irving L. Smith                  
|                        |  | Irving L. Smith                      
|                        |  | Chief Financial Officer
§ 5.520 Job classification and structure. A recipient shall not: ( a ) Classify a job as being for males or for females;
( b ) Maintain or establish separate lines of progression, seniority lists, career ladders, or tenure systems based on sex; or
( c ) Maintain or establish separate lines of progression, seniority systems, career ladders, or tenure systems for similar jobs, position descriptions, or job requirements that classify persons on the basis of sex, unless sex is a bona fide occupational qualification for the positions in question as set forth in § 5.550.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5         Financial Data Schedule for 3rd Quarter 10-Q
<CIK> 0000764841
<NAME> COMPUTER TELEPHONE CORP.

<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

       
<S>                                     <C>  
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       Mar-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                            Dec-31-1995
<CASH>                                  3,718
<SECURITIES>                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                           6,011
<ALLOWANCES>                            128
<INVENTORY>                             26
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        10,269
<PP&E>                                  5,665
<DEPRECIATION>                          4,601
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          11,511
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   3,102
<BONDS>                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                             0
<COMMON>                                0
<OTHER-SE>                              8,313
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            11,511
<SALES>                                 8,150
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        8,200
<CGS>                                   1,022
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           6,208
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         1,992
<INCOME-TAX>                            817
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     1,175
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                            1,175
<EPS-PRIMARY>                           0.11
<EPS-DILUTED>                           0.11
        


</TABLE>
PGI 249.109-7 Settlement by determination.       (1)  Use a Standard Form 30 (SF 30), Amendment of Solicitation/Modification of Contract, to settle a convenience termination by determination—          (i)  When the contractor has lost its right of appeal because it failed to submit a timely settlement proposal; and          (ii)  To confirm the determination when the contractor does not appeal the termination contracting officer's decision.          (2)  The effective date of the SF 30 shall be the same as the date of the letter of determination.  Do not assign a supplementary procurement instrument identification number to the letter of determination.  Send a copy of the SF 30 to the contractor by certified mail return receipt requested.    **Parent topic:** PGI 249.109 Settlement agreements.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 471 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 471

     Supporting the goals and ideals of a ``National IT'S ACADEMIC 
                      Television Quiz Show Day''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 28, 2005

 Mr. Tom Davis of Virginia (for himself and Mr. Van Hollen) submitted 
   the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 
                           Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
     Supporting the goals and ideals of a ``National IT'S ACADEMIC 
                      Television Quiz Show Day''.

Whereas IT'S ACADEMIC, the Nation's foremost televised high school quiz show 
        will begin its 45th season on NBC4 in Washington, and is the longest 
        running television quiz show in the Nation's history;
Whereas IT'S ACADEMIC has used the power of television to motivate and showcase 
        two generations of students in cities across the country, including 
        Washington, D.C., Baltimore, Charlottesville, New York, Los Angeles, 
        Chicago, Honolulu, Philadelphia, Boston, Denver, Cincinnati, Cleveland, 
        Buffalo, Jacksonville, Norfolk, Rochester, Fort Wayne, Wilmington, and 
        the entire State of Kentucky;
Whereas each year hundreds of secondary schools--public, parochial, private, 
        suburban, rural, and inner-city--compete on IT'S ACADEMIC, demonstrating 
        a diverse student population focused on academic excellence, and 
        encouraging community support for education;
Whereas the dedicated teachers who work with the teams and prepare them for the 
        competition are introduced on the program, providing them with positive 
        recognition that reflects on the entire teaching profession;
Whereas the corporate sponsors of IT'S ACADEMIC have generously given 
        scholarship grants to participating schools to help students pursue 
        their education;
Whereas IT'S ACADEMIC has encouraged academic excellence by promoting academic 
        competition as a motivating factor, and generates the same adulation and 
        respect for student scholars as for student athletes; and
Whereas IT'S ACADEMIC continues to provide a forum for showcasing academic 
        excellence at the high school level, and presenting a positive image of 
        schools, teachers and students, thereby helping to offset negative 
        stereotypes: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) supports the goals and ideals of a ``National IT'S 
        ACADEMIC Television Quiz Show Day''; and
            (2) urges all individuals in the United States to share in 
        such commemoration so as to appreciate how this day can 
        motivate young people to strive for academic excellence.
                                 <all>
```
#### POWERS, Respondent, v. POWERS, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

December 11, 1914.)

Action by William F. Powers against Hortense Powers.

No opinion. Motion for reargument (of 150 N. Y. Supp. 213) denied, with $10 costs. Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied.
1

Parsons, Nick

From: McMahon, Al (SABIC Innovative Plastics) [Al.McMahon@sabic-ip.com]

Sent: Tuesday, February 18, 2014 3:02 PM

To: Parsons, Nick

Cc: Varner, Thomas L (SABIC Innovative Plastics)

Subject: Request for extension of comment deadline; Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2012-0133

Attachments: SABIC request for extension of comment deadline (02-18-2014).PDF

Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2012-0133 

Dear Mr. Parsons, 

Attached is a request by SABIC Innovative Plastics US LLC to extend the comment deadline in the abovereferenced docket. 

Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions. 

-- 

Regards, 

Alphonse McMahon 

SABIC 

Senior Counsel, EHSS 

1 Lexan Lane 

Mount Vernon, IN 47620 

T: 1.812.831.4688 

F: 1.866.505.7124 

E: al.mcmahon@sabic-ip.com

www.sabic-ip.com

-------------------------------- 

This e-mail and any attachments are for authorized use by the intended recipient(s) only. They may contain 

proprietary material or confidential information and/or be subject to legal privilege. They should not be copied, 

disclosed to, or used by any other party. 

If you have reason to believe that you are not one of the intended recipients of this e-mail, please notify the 

sender immediately by reply e-mail and immediately delete this e-mail and any of its attachments. Thank you.
Subpart 1844.2—Consent to Subcontracts

Parent topic: PART 1844—SUBCONTRACTING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES

1844.204 Contract clauses.

1844.204-70 NASA contract clause.

The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 1852.244–70, Geographic Participation in the

Aerospace Program, in all research and development solicitations and contracts of $500,000 or over

that will be performed within the United States.
Editorial Note on Part 4
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 4 appear at 77 FR 39904, July 6, 2012.

§ 4.122 General prohibitions against employment discrimination. ( a ) No qualified disabled person shall, on the basis of disability, be subjected to discrimination in employment under any program or activity that receives Federal financial assistance.
( b ) A recipient shall make all decisions concerning employment under any program or activity to which this subpart applies in a manner which ensures that discrimination on the basis of disability does not occur and may not limit, segregate, or classify applicants or employees in any way that adversely affects their opportunities or status because of disability.
( c ) The prohibition against discrimination in employment applies to the following activities: ( 1 ) Recruitment, advertising, and the processing of applications for employment;
( 2 ) Hiring, upgrading, promotion, award of tenure, demotion, transfer, layoff, termination, right of return from layoff, and rehiring;
( 3 ) Rates of pay or any other form of compensation and changes in compensation;
( 4 ) Job assignments, job classifications, organizational structures, position descriptions, lines of progression, and seniority lists;
( 5 ) Leaves of absence, sick leave, or any other leave;
( 6 ) Fringe benefits available by virtue of employment, whether or not administered by the recipient;
( 7 ) Selection and financial support for training, including apprenticeship, professional meetings, conferences, and other related activities and selection for leaves of absence to pursue training;
( 8 ) Employer sponsored activities, including those that are social or recreational; and
( 9 ) Any other term, condition, or privilege of employment.
( d ) A recipient may not participate in a contractual or other relationship that has the effect of subjecting qualified disabled applicants or employees to discrimination prohibited by this subpart. The relationships referred to in this paragraph include relationships with employment and referral agencies, with labor unions, with organizations providing or administering fringe benefits to employees of the recipient, and with organizations providing training and apprenticeships.
[45 FR 14535, Mar. 6, 1980, as amended at 68 FR 51345, Aug. 26, 2003]
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 1997 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                         11,065,084
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    30,776,055
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         58,548,941
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           0
<LOANS>                                       204,128,158
<ALLOWANCE>                                     2,091,206
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                312,928,457
<DEPOSITS>                                    272,371,710
<SHORT-TERM>                                    6,929,662
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             3,326,509
<LONG-TERM>                                    0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                        4,530,688
<OTHER-SE>                                     25,769,888
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                312,928,457
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 8,997,462
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               2,828,873
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   63,795
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               11,890,130
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              5,014,088
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              5,135,825
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           6,754,305
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                     240,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                              0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 4,885,396
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 3,002,315
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      3,002,315
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 0
<CHANGES>                                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                    2,092,671
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   1.16
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   1.16
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                  4.65
<LOANS-NON>                                        9,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                     103,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                1,986,000
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                     215,000
<RECOVERIES>                                       80,000
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               2,091,000
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            1,931,000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                             0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                         160,000
        


</TABLE>
PGI 246.407 Nonconforming supplies or services.       Additional information on delegation of authority for acceptance of minor nonconformances in aviation and ship critical safety items is available at http://www.aviation.dla.mil/UserWeb/AviationEngineering/EngineeringSupp....    **Parent topic:** PGI 246.4 -GOVERNMENT CONTRACT QUALITY ASSURANCE
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, 

NORTHERN DIVISION

J.B., a minor child, by and through his )

next friend, ADDIE WARD, on behalf of )

himself and all other similarly situated; )

) Case No: 2:06-CV-755-MHT

Plaintiff, )

)

vs. )

)

WALTER WOOD, in his individual )

capacity, )

)

Defendant. )

J.B., a minor child, by and through his )

next friend, ADDIE WARD, on behalf of )

himself and all other similarly situated; )

) Case No: 2:06-CV-908-MHT

Plaintiff, )

)

vs. )

)

WALTER WOOD, in his individual )

capacity, )

)

Defendant. )

Case 2:06-cv-00755-MHT-CSC Document 48 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 1 of 3
2

MOTION TO AMEND MOTION

FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER 

TO QUASH THE TAKING OF THREE DEPOSITIONS

The undersigned counsel previously filed on a

motion for protective order for Gary Gregg, Queen

Barker, and Khaki Sanford. (Doc. 46). This motion is

to amend said motion for protective order to include

the subpoena for taking the deposition of Jada Ross. 

Ms. Ross is also an employee of the Department of Youth

Services and serves on the Screening and Placement

Committee. This motion is based on the same grounds as

the original Motion.

WHEREFORE, for the foregoing reasons, the

Department moves the Court to enter a protective order

quashing the deposition subpoenas of DYS employees--

Gary Gregg, Queen Barker, Khaki Sanford, and Jada

Ross–and ordering that the depositions shall not

proceed.

Respectfully submitted

TROY KING

ATTORNEY GENERAL

Case 2:06-cv-00755-MHT-CSC Document 48 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 2 of 3
3

s/ T. Dudley Perry, Jr. 

T. Dudley Perry, Jr.

Bar Number: 3985-R67T

Deputy Attorney General

Alabama Dept of Youth Services

Post Office Box 66

Mt. Meigs, AL 36057

Telephone: (334) 215-3803

Fax: (334) 215-3872

E-Mail:

dudley.perry@dys.alabama.gov

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on the 27th day of July,

th

2007, I electronically filed the forgoing Motion to

Amend Motion for Protective Order to Quash the Taking

of Three Depositions, with the Clerk of the Court using

the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such

filing to the following:

Michael J. Crow, Esq.

Beasley, Allen

Post Office Box 4160

Montgomery, AL 36103-4160

Robert D. Drummond, Jr., Esq

Attorney At Law

323 De La Mare Avenue

Fairhope, AL 36532

s/T. Dudley Perry, Jr. 

T. Dudley Perry, Jr.

Deputy Attorney General

Alabama Department of

Youth Services

Case 2:06-cv-00755-MHT-CSC Document 48 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 3 of 3
#### LEIB, Appellant, v. LOWE, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

May 29, 1914.)

Action by Louise T. Leib, as administratrix, etc., of George M. Lohner, deceased, against Edmund R. Lowe.

No opinion. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with c*o*sts.
#### MALONE, Appellant, v. INDIAN REFINING CO., Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

December 2, 1914.)

Action by William Malone against the Indian Refining Company.

No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs.
#### § 503.3 [Reserved]
#### § 1041.151 Program accessibility: New construction and alterations.

Each building or part of a building that is constructed or altered by, on behalf of, or for the use of the agency shall be designed, constructed, or altered so as to be readily accessible to and usable by handicapped persons. The definitions, requirements, and standards of the Architectural Barriers Act (42 U.S.C. 4151-4157), as established in 41 CFR 101-19.600 to 101-19.607, apply to buildings covered by this section.