Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 205 / Wednesday, October 23, 2013 / Proposed Rules 63135 

(1) If the inspection was done on or after 

the effective date of this AD: Submit the 

report within 30 days after the inspection. 

(2) If the inspection was done before the 

effective date of this AD: Submit the report 

within 30 days after the effective date of this 

AD. 

(j) Terminating Repair 

Before the accumulation 50,000 total flight 

cycles, or within 8 months after the effective 

date of this AD, whichever occurs later: Do 

the terminating repair of the forward fuselage 

butt-joints, including a detailed inspection 

for cracks in the butt strap on the inside of 

the applicable joint, and all applicable 

corrective actions, in accordance with the 

Accomplishment Instructions of Fokker 

Service Bulletin SBF100–53–119, Revision 2, 

dated May 8, 2013. Do all applicable 

corrective actions before further flight. 

(k) Credit for Previous Actions 

(1) This paragraph provides credit for 

applicable actions required by paragraphs (g) 

and (h)(1) of this AD, if those actions were 

performed before the effective date of this AD 

using the service bulletins specified in 

paragraphs (k)(1)(i) or (k)(1)(ii) of this AD, 

which are not incorporated by reference in 

this AD. 

(i) Fokker Service Bulletin SBF100–53– 

118, dated April 10, 2012. 

(ii) Fokker Service Bulletin SBF100–53– 

118, Revision 1, dated July 6, 2012. 

(2) This paragraph provides credit for 

actions required by paragraphs (h)(2) and (j) 

of this AD, if those actions were performed 

before the effective date of this AD using the 

service bulletins specified in paragraphs 

(k)(2)(i) or (k)(2)(ii) of this AD, which are not 

incorporated by reference in this AD. 

(i) Fokker Service Bulletin SBF100–53– 

119, dated June 20, 2012. 

(ii) Fokker Service Bulletin SBF100–53– 

119, Revision 1, dated October 30, 2012. 

(l) Compliance Time Provisions 

No alternative compliance times may be 

used for the modification required by 

paragraph (j) of this AD, unless extensive 

new data are provided and the compliance 

time is approved as an alternative method of 

compliance (AMOC) in accordance with the 

procedures specified in paragraph (m) of this 

AD. 

(m) Other FAA AD Provisions 

The following provisions also apply to this 

AD: 

(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance 

(AMOCs): The Manager, International 

Branch, ANM–116, FAA, has the authority to 

approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested 

using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. 

In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your 

request to your principal inspector or local 

Flight Standards District Office, as 

appropriate. If sending information directly 

to the International Branch, send it to ATTN: 

Tom Rodriguez, Aerospace Engineer, 

International Branch, ANM–116, Transport 

Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind 

Avenue SW., Renton, Washington 98057– 

3356; telephone (425) 227–1137; fax (425) 

227–1149. Information may be emailed to: 9- 

ANM-116-AMOC-REQUESTS@faa.gov. 

Before using any approved AMOC, notify 

your appropriate principal inspector, or 

lacking a principal inspector, the manager of 

the local flight standards district office/

certificate holding district office. The AMOC 

approval letter must specifically reference 

this AD. 

(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement 

in this AD to obtain corrective actions from 

a manufacturer or other source, use these 

actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective 

actions are considered FAA-approved if they 

are approved by the State of Design Authority 

(or their delegated agent). You are required 

to assure the product is airworthy before it 

is returned to service. 

(3) Reporting Requirements: A federal 

agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a 

person is not required to respond to, nor 

shall a person be subject to a penalty for 

failure to comply with a collection of 

information subject to the requirements of 

the Paperwork Reduction Act unless that 

collection of information displays a current 

valid OMB Control Number. The OMB 

Control Number for this information 

collection is 2120–0056. Public reporting for 

this collection of information is estimated to 

be approximately 5 minutes per response, 

including the time for reviewing instructions, 

completing and reviewing the collection of 

information. All responses to this collection 

of information are mandatory. Comments 

concerning the accuracy of this burden and 

suggestions for reducing the burden should 

be directed to the FAA at: 800 Independence 

Ave. SW., Washington, DC 20591, Attn: 

Information Collection Clearance Officer, 

AES–200. 

(n) Related Information 

(1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing 

Airworthiness Information European 

Aviation Safety Agency Airworthiness 

Directive 2012–0218, dated October 19, 2012, 

for related information, which can be found 

in the AD docket on the Internet at http://

www.regulations.gov. 

(2) For service information identified in 

this AD, contact Fokker Services B.V., 

Technical Services Dept., P.O. Box 1357, 

2130 EL Hoofddorp, the Netherlands; 

telephone +31 (0)88–6280–350; fax +31 

(0)88–6280–111; email technicalservices@

fokker.com; Internet http://

www.myfokkerfleet.com. You may review 

copies of the referenced service information 

at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 

1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For 

information on the availability of this 

material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221. 

Issued in Renton, Washington, on 

September 30, 2013. 

Jeffrey E. Duven, 

Acting Manager, Transport Airplane 

Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. 

[FR Doc. 2013–24795 Filed 10–22–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 39 

[Docket No. FAA–2005–21236; Directorate 

Identifier 2005–NM–011–AD] 

RIN 2120–AA64 

Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing 

Company Airplanes 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), Department of 

Transportation (DOT). 

ACTION: Proposed rule; withdrawal. 

SUMMARY: The FAA withdraws a notice 

of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) that 

proposed a new airworthiness directive 

(AD) for certain The Boeing Company 

Model 767 airplanes equipped with 

General Electric Model CF6–80C2 

engines. The NPRM proposed to require 

modifying a relay installation and 

associated wiring of the engine cowl 

anti-ice system and performing a 

functional test of the thrust reverser 

system. The NPRM also proposed to 

require replacing the operational 

program software of certain indicating/ 

recording systems. Since we issued the 

NPRM, we have received new data that 

indicate the unsafe condition would not 

be adequately addressed by the 

proposed action. The manufacturer has 

issued new service information to 

address the unsafe condition. 

Consequently, we issued new 

rulemaking action that positively 

addresses the unsafe condition 

identified in the NPRM, and eliminates 

the need for the actions proposed in the 

NPRM. Accordingly, the NPRM is 

withdrawn. 

DATES: As of October 23, 2013, the 

proposed rule, which was published in 

the Federal Register on May 18, 2005 

(70 FR 28489), is withdrawn. 

ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD 

docket on the Internet at http://

www.regulations.gov; or in person at the 

Docket Management Facility between 9 

a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through 

Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD 

docket contains this AD action, the 

regulatory evaluation, any comments 

received, and other information. The 

street address for the Docket Office 

(phone: 800–647–5527) is the Document 

Management Facility, U.S. Department 

of Transportation, Docket Operations, 

M–30, West Building Ground Floor, 

Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey 

Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Tung Tran, Aerospace Engineer, 

Propulsion Branch, ANM–140S, FAA, 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
63136 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 205 / Wednesday, October 23, 2013 / Proposed Rules 

Seattle Aircraft Certification Office, 

1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 

98057–3356; phone: 425–917–6505; fax: 

425–917–6590; email: tung.tran@

faa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Discussion 

We proposed to amend part 39 of the 

Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 

part 39) with a notice of proposed 

rulemaking (NPRM) for a new AD for 

certain Model 767 series airplanes. The 

NPRM published in the Federal 

Register on May 18, 2005 (70 FR 28489). 

The NPRM proposed to require 

modifying a relay installation and 

associated wiring of the engine cowl 

anti-ice system and performing a 

functional test of the thrust reverser 

system. The NPRM also proposed to 

require replacing the operational 

program software of certain indicating/ 

recording systems. The NPRM was 

prompted by numerous operator reports 

of failures of the lock flexshaft of the 

thrust reverser actuation system (TRAS) 

between the upper actuator and the 

TRAS lock. We had proposed the AD to 

prevent high power in-flight 

deployment of a thrust reverser, which 

could cause high roll force and 

consequent departure from controlled 

flight. 

Actions Since NPRM (70 FR 28489, 

May 18, 2005) Was Issued 

Since we issued the NPRM (70 FR 

28489, May 18, 2005), we have received 

new data that indicate the unsafe 

condition would not be adequately 

addressed by the proposed action. 

Consequently, we issued a new NPRM 

(78 FR 3363, January 16, 2013) that 

positively addresses the unsafe 

condition identified in the NPRM (70 

FR 28489, May 18, 2005) and eliminates 

the need for the actions proposed in that 

NPRM (70 FR 28489, May 18, 2005). 

FAA’s Conclusions 

We have determined that the unsafe 

condition identified in the NPRM (70 

FR 28489, May 18, 2005) still exists. 

However, the unsafe condition is 

addressed in the new NPRM (78 FR 

3363, January 16, 2013). Accordingly, 

the NPRM (70 FR 28489, May 18, 2005) 

is withdrawn. 

Withdrawal of the NPRM (70 FR 

28489, May 18, 2005) does not preclude 

the FAA from issuing the related actions 

or commit the FAA to any course of 

action in the future. 

Regulatory Impact 

Since this action only withdraws the 

NPRM (70 FR 28489, May 18, 2005), it 

is neither a proposed nor a final rule 

and therefore is not covered under 

Executive Order 12866, the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act, or DOT Regulatory 

Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, 

February 26, 1979). 

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 

Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation 

safety, Incorporation by reference, 

Safety. 

The Withdrawal 

Accordingly, we withdraw the NPRM, 

Docket No. FAA–2005–21236, 

Directorate Identifier 2005–NM–011– 

AD, which published in the Federal 

Register on May 18, 2005 (70 FR 28489). 

Issued in Renton, Washington, on 

September 30, 2013. 

Jeffrey E. Duven, 

Acting Manager, Transport Airplane 

Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. 

[FR Doc. 2013–24797 Filed 10–22–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

SECURITY 

Coast Guard 

33 CFR Part 117 

[Docket No. USCG–2013–0562] 

RIN 1625–AA09 

Drawbridge Operation Regulation; 

Inner Harbor Navigational Canal, New 

Orleans, LA 

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS. 

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking. 

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to 

modify the operating schedules that 

govern the US 90 (Danzinger) Bridge 

across the Inner Harbor Navigational 

Canal (IHNC), mile 3.1 and the Senator 

Ted Hickey (Leon C. Simon Blvd./

Seabrook) bridge across the IHNC, mile 

4.6, both at New Orleans, LA. This 

proposed change would allow for the 

safe navigation of vessels while 

reflecting the low volume of vessel 

traffic through the bridges thereby 

increasing efficiency of operations. The 

proposed change would allow the 

bridges to operate in a manner that 

would align the two operating schedules 

so the bridge owner would be able to 

use the same bridge crew personnel to 

operate both bridges with little to no 

effect on navigation through the bridges. 

DATES: Comments and related material 

must reach the Coast Guard on or before 

December 23, 2013. 

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments 

identified by docket number USCG– 

2013–0562 using any one of the 

following methods: 

(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal: 

http://www.regulations.gov. 

(2) Fax: 202–493–2251. 

(3) Mail or Delivery: Docket 

Management Facility (M–30), U.S. 

Department of Transportation, West 

Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 

1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., 

Washington, DC 20590–0001. Deliveries 

accepted between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., 

Monday through Friday, except federal 

holidays. The telephone number is 202– 

366–9329. 

See the ‘‘Public Participation and 

Request for Comments’’ portion of the 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section 

below for instructions on submitting 

comments. To avoid duplication, please 

use only one of these four methods. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If 

you have questions on this proposed 

rule, call or email the Coast Guard; Mr. 

Jim Wetherington telephone 504–671– 

2128, emails james.r.wetherington@

uscg.mil. If you have questions on 

viewing or submitting material to the 

docket, call Barbara Hairston, Program 

Manager, Docket Operations, telephone 

202–366–9826. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Table of Acronyms 

CFR Code of Federal Regulations 

DHS Department of Homeland Security 

FR Federal Register 

GIWW Gulf Intracoastal Waterway 

LDOTD Louisiana Department of 

Transportation and Development 

NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking 

§ Section Symbol 

U.S.C. United States Code 

A. Public Participation and Request for 

Comments 

We encourage you to participate in 

this proposed rulemaking by submitting 

comments and related materials. All 

comments received will be posted, 

without change to http://

www.regulations.gov and will include 

any personal information you have 

provided. 

1. Submitting Comments 

If you submit a comment, please 

include the docket number for this 

proposed rulemaking (USCG–2013– 

0562), indicate the specific section of 

this document to which each comment 

applies, and provide a reason for each 

suggestion or recommendation. You 

may submit your comments and 

material online (http://

www.regulations.gov), or by fax, mail or 

hand delivery, but please use only one 

of these means. If you submit a 

comment online via http://


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS