alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
exv10w30






Exhibit 10.30




NEXTEL




PRIVATE EMPLOYMENT CONTRACT FOR DEFINED TERM

AND ON A PROBATIONARY BASIS



The parties to this contract are NEXTEL TELECOMUNICAÇÕES LTDA., which has an establishment at Rua
Bela Cintra 1196 in the city of São Paulo, enrolled in the National Register of Legal Entities
(CNPJ) as No. 66.970.229/0057-11, hereinafter EMPLOYER, and SERGIO BORGES CHAIA, holder of
Employment and Social Security record card No. 24915, Series 00086, hereinafter EMPLOYEE, who have
agreed to the following clauses and conditions:



CLAUSE ONE: EMPLOYEE is admitted to EMPLOYER’S staff in order to perform the duties of PRESIDENT
and other related assigned functions as may become the subject of oral communications,
letters1, or notices.



CLAUSE TWO: EMPLOYEE shall pursue his activities at the establishment situated in this state
capital city at Rua Bela Cintra or at such other address as may be adopted by EMPLOYER.




     Paragraph One of One: EMPLOYEE may be transferred from the aforementioned work site, either
temporarily or permanently, to any other locality as may become necessary, but within this country.


CLAUSE THREE: EMPLOYEE shall work 220 hours per month.



CLAUSE FOUR: EMPLOYEE shall receive monthly compensation in the form of a fixed salary of
R$92,308.00 (ninety-two thousand three hundred and eight Brazilian reais).



CLAUSE FIVE: EMPLOYER shall grant a monthly advance corresponding to 40% (forty percent) of the
fixed salary on a date it will establish.






 




			
	1	 	Translator’s note. Cartas [letters] is misspelled as certas, which cannot be translated.




 









 









CLAUSE SIX: In addition to deductions stipulated in the law, agreement, or collective bargaining
agreement or convention, EMPLOYER may deduct from EMPLOYEE sums corresponding to damage or losses
caused by him through malice or negligence in the performance of his duties.



CLAUSE SEVEN: EMPLOYEE is aware of the regulations in effect at the company and of the rules that
govern the activities of EMPLOYER and agrees to observe them, and to use the safety equipment
furnished of safety [sic], under penalty of being accused of gross negligence.



CLAUSE EIGHT: This contract shall remain in effect for a period of 45 (forty-five) days, beginning
on January 16, 2007, and may be extended for an additional 45 (forty-five) days.




     Paragraph One of One. It is established that at the end of the above period, the duration of
this contract shall either become indefinite or it shall be rescinded, without prior notice or
indemnification.


In witness whereof, the parties execute this instrument in 2 (two) copies of equal form and
content, in the presence of the witnesses whose signatures appear below.



São Paulo, January 16, 2007



[signed] EMPLOYER NEXTEL TELECOMUNICAÇÕES LTDA.



[signed] EMPLOYEE SERGIO BORGES CHAIA



LEGALLY RESPONSIBLE PARTY (WHEN [PARTY IS] A MINOR)





2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

vs. ) CR. NO. 1:06CR201-WHA

)

OSCAR MARTINEZ-RAMIREZ )

ORDER

Pursuant to the defendant’s Notice of Intent to Change Plea (Doc. #47) filed on

February 26, 2007, it is hereby

ORDERED that the defendant’s change of plea hearing be and is hereby set for 

March 7, 2007, at 11:30 a.m., in courtroom 4B, United States Courthouse Complex,

One Church Street, Montgomery, Alabama. 

The Clerk is directed to provide an interpreter and a court reporter for this

proceeding. If the defendant is in custody, the United States Marshal or the person

having custody of the defendant shall produce the defendant for the proceeding.

Done this 26th day of February, 2007.

 /s/Charles S. Coody 

CHARLES S. COODY

CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:06-cr-00201-WHA-CSC Document 48 Filed 02/26/2007 Page 1 of 1
#### James FLOWERS *v.*STATE of Arkansas

CR 07-851

261 S.W.3d 451

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Opinion delivered September 6, 2007

*Ronald L. Davis,*for appellant.

No response.

Per Curiam.

James Flowers, by his attorney, Ronald L. Davis, has filed a motion for rule on clerk. On March 26, 2007, a judgment and commitment order was entered convicting Flowers inter alia of aggravated robbery, count eight of the felony information, and sentencing him to 168 months’ imprisonment. An amended judgment and commitment order was entered on April 3, 2007, in which he was convicted of the count-eight aggravated-robbery charge and sentenced to 480 months’ imprisonment. On April 27, 2007, a notice of appeal was filed with the Pulaski County Circuit Clerk in which Flowers sought to appeal the April 3, 2007, amended order.

Rule 2(a)(1) of the Arkansas Rules of Appellate Procedure-Civil provides that an appeal may be taken only from a final judgment or decree entered by the trial court. Here, pursuant to Ark. R. App. P.-Civ. 2(a)(1), Flowers filed his notice of appeal well within the thirty-day period of the entry of the April 3, 2007, amended order. Thus, we hold that Flowers timely filed the record with our clerk, and we direct the clerk to accept the appeal.

Motion granted.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 474 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 474

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                       October 6, 2005.
    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider the conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 2360) making 
appropriations for the Department of Homeland Security for the fiscal year 
ending September 30, 2006, and for other purposes. All points of order against 
the conference report and against its consideration are waived. The conference 
report shall be considered as read.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
Case 2:06-cv-00717-ID-SRW Document 25 Filed 03/09/2007 Page 1 of 4
Case 2:06-cv-00717-ID-SRW Document 25 Filed 03/09/2007 Page 2 of 4
Case 2:06-cv-00717-ID-SRW Document 25 Filed 03/09/2007 Page 3 of 4
Case 2:06-cv-00717-ID-SRW Document 25 Filed 03/09/2007 Page 4 of 4
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas** MEMORANDUM OPINION
N o. 04

- 16

- 00804

- CR Isidro Juan FLORES , Appellant

v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee From the 379th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2016CR5527 Honorable Ron Rangel, Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice Irene Rios, Justice Delivered and Filed: February 1, 2017
DIS MISSED Isidro Juan Flores entered into a plea bargain with the State, pursuant to which Flores pleaded nolo contendere to sexual assa ult of a child. The trial court imposed sentence in accordance with the agreement and signed a certificate stating this “is a plea

- bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 25.2(a)(2). Flores timely filed a notice of appe al. The clerk’s record, which includes the trial court’s rule 25.2(a)(2) certification and a written plea bargain agreement, has been filed. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 25.2(d).04

- 16

- 00804

- CV

- 2

- The clerk’s record establishes the punishment assessed by the court do es not exceed the punishment recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 25.2(a)(2). We have reviewed the clerk’s record, and the trial court’s certification appears to accurately state that this is a plea bargain case and Flores does not have a right to appeal. See Dears
v. State , 154 S.W.3d 610 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (holding that court of appeals should review clerk’s record to determine whether trial court’s certification is accurate). This court must dismiss
an app eal “if a certification that shows the defendant has the right of appeal has not been made part of the record.” T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 25.2(d)

. On December 29, 2017, we gave Flores notice that the appeal would be dismissed unless an amended trial court certificat ion showing he has the right to appeal has been made part of the appellate record by January 19, 2017. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 25.2(d); 37.1; Daniels v. State , 110 S.W.3d 174 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 2003, order), disp. on merits , No. 04

- 03

- 00176

- CR, 2003 WL 215 08347 (July 2, 2003, pet. ref’d) (not designated for publication). An amended certification showing Flores has the right to appeal has not been filed. We therefore dismiss this appeal. T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 25.2(d).
PER CURIAM Do not publish
**usbank****Annual Statement of Compliance****Morgan Stanley Bank of America Merrill Lynch Trust 2013-C7***VIA: EMAIL*Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc. 1585 Broadway New York, New York 10036 Attention: Stephen Holmes stephen.holmes@morganstanley.com Re: The  Pooling  and  Servicing  Agreement  (the  "Agreement")  dated  as  of  January  1,  2013  among Morgan  Stanley  Capital  I,  Inc.  as  depositor,  Midland  Loan  Services,  a  Division  of  PNC  Bank, National  Association,  as  master  servicer  and  special  servicer,  Situs  Holdings,  LLC,  as  trust advisor,  Wells  Fargo  Bank,  National  Association,  as  custodian  and  U.S.  Bank  National Association, as trustee, certificate administrator, certificate registrar and authenticating agent I, Kimberly O. Jacobs, a Senior Vice President of U.S. Bank National Association, as Certificate Administrator, as a certifying servicer hereby certify that:           (1) A review of the activities of the  Certificate Administrator during the preceding calendar year (the  "Reporting  Period") and  of the  performance  of  the  Certificate  Administrator  under the  Agreement has been made under my supervision; and           (2) To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Certificate Administrator has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout such Reporting Period  Capitalized terms used but not defined herein have the meanings set forth in the Agreement. Date: March 15, 2016 U.S. Bank National Association as Certificate Administrator  By:  /s/ Kimberly O. Jacobs Kimberly O. Jacobs Senior Vice President
Editorial Note on Part 420
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 420 appear at 64 FR 46114, Aug. 24, 1999.

§ 420.38 Special projects expenditure prohibitions and limitations. ( a ) Expenditures under the special projects are subject to 10 CFR part 600 and to any prohibitions and limitations required by the DOE programs that are providing the special projects funding.
( b ) DOE must state any expenditure prohibitions or limitations specific to a particular category of special projects in the annual SEP special projects solicitation/guidance.
[64 FR 46114, Aug. 24, 1999]
§ 13.22 Exchange of witness lists, statements, and exhibits. ( a ) At least 15 days before the hearing or at such other times as may be ordered by the ALJ, the parties shall exchange witness lists, copies of prior statements of proposed witnesses, and copies of proposed hearing exhibits, including copies of any written statements that the party intends to offer in lieu of live testimony in accordance with § 13.33(b). At the time the above documents are exchanged, any party that intends to rely on the transcript of deposition testimony in lieu of live testimony at the hearing, if permitted by the ALJ, shall provide each party with a copy of the specific pages of the transcript it intends to introduce into evidence.
( b ) If a party objects, the ALJ shall not admit into evidence the testimony of any witness whose name does not appear on the witness list or any exhibit not provided to the opposing party as provided above unless the ALJ finds good cause for the failure or that there in no prejudice to the objecting party.
( c ) Unless another party objects within the time set by the ALJ, documents exchanged in accordance with paragraph (a) of this section shall be deemed to be authentic for the purpose of admissibility at the hearing.
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302(A) OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



I, Pierric Senay, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports
on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Hyundai Auto Receivables Trust
2013-A (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);



2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports,
taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing
and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange
Act periodic reports;



4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement
required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer
has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and



5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing
criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act
Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material
instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.



In giving the certifications above, I have
reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: U.S. Bank National Association.



Date: March 18, 2016



| | By: | /s/ Pierric Senay                                            
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------
| |     | Name: Pierric Senay                                          
| |     | Title:  President and Secretary                              
| |     | (senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
Editorial Note on Part 35
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 35 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

§ 35.55 Training for an authorized nuclear pharmacist. Except as provided in § 35.57, the licensee shall require the authorized nuclear pharmacist to be a pharmacist who— ( a ) Is certified by a specialty board whose certification process has been recognized by the Commission or an Agreement State. The names of board certifications that have been recognized by the Commission or an Agreement State are posted on the NRC's Medical Uses Licensee Toolkit web page. To have its certification process recognized, a specialty board shall require all candidates for certification to: ( 1 ) Have graduated from a pharmacy program accredited by the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE) (previously named the American Council on Pharmaceutical Education) or have passed the Foreign Pharmacy Graduate Examination Committee (FPGEC) examination;
( 2 ) Hold a current, active license to practice pharmacy;
( 3 ) Provide evidence of having acquired at least 4000 hours of training/experience in nuclear pharmacy practice. Academic training may be substituted for no more than 2000 hours of the required training and experience; and
( 4 ) Pass an examination in nuclear pharmacy administered by diplomates of the specialty board, that assesses knowledge and competency in procurement, compounding, quality assurance, dispensing, distribution, health and safety, radiation safety, provision of information and consultation, monitoring patient outcomes, research and development; or
( b ) ( 1 ) Has completed 700 hours in a structured educational program consisting of both: ( i ) 200 hours of classroom and laboratory training in the following areas— ( A ) Radiation physics and instrumentation;
( B ) Radiation protection;
( C ) Mathematics pertaining to the use and measurement of radioactivity;
( D ) Chemistry of byproduct material for medical use; and
( E ) Radiation biology; and
( ii ) Supervised practical experience in a nuclear pharmacy involving— ( A ) Shipping, receiving, and performing related radiation surveys;
( B ) Using and performing checks for proper operation of instruments used to determine the activity of dosages, survey meters, and, if appropriate, instruments used to measure alpha- or beta-emitting radionuclides;
( C ) Calculating, assaying, and safely preparing dosages for patients or human research subjects;
( D ) Using administrative controls to avoid medical events in the administration of byproduct material; and
( E ) Using procedures to prevent or minimize radioactive contamination and using proper decontamination procedures; and
( 2 ) Has obtained written attestation, signed by a preceptor authorized nuclear pharmacist, that the individual has satisfactorily completed the requirements in paragraph (b)(1) of this section and is able to independently fulfill the radiation safety-related duties as an authorized nuclear pharmacist.
[67 FR 20370, Apr. 24, 2002, as amended at 70 FR 16362, Mar. 30, 2005; 83 FR 33105, July 16, 2018; 86 FR 43402, Aug. 9, 2021]
possible. 

• Wash the sting with soap and water. 

• Put ice or cool water on it for 

10 to 30 minutes. 

• 

B 

Without pollinators, we wouldn't have agr

United States Environmental Protection Agency 2003 

What’s all the BUZZZZZZ? 

Which is which? Label and color 

the wasp and the honeybee. Circle the 

pollen baskets on the honeybee. 

H

oneybees and wasps sting to defend themselves, NOT to 

attack. For bees and wasps, stings are a good way to keep 

people from bugging them. Bee stings hurt. They can even 

be deadly if someone is allergic. 

• Honeybees collect pollen and carry it in a 

basket of stiff hairs on each hind-leg. When 

they rest, their wings are flat. 

• Wasps do not have “pollen baskets” and do not 

collect pollen. When they rest, their wings are 

folded back and look narrower than a bee’s 

wings. 

Tip for Grown-ups: 

Keep a bee sting kit handy at home and 

in the car. If you or a family member is 

allergic to bee stings, ask your doctor 

what you need to have on hand. 

iculture! 

First Aid 

A 

17 Q. What goes zzub, zzub, zzub? 

A. A bee flying backwards. 

Prevent Stings! 

Try not to attract bees. If they come 

around, don’t frighten them. Check 

what you should do in areas with bees: 

 Avoid using scented products. This 

means hair spray, scented soaps, 

perfume, and lotions. 

 Avoid brightly colored clothes, 

especially flowered patterns. 

 Keep food and soda cans covered. 

 Wear hats, shoes, and long pants. 

 If a bee comes around, 

hold very still. 

 If a bee lands on you, don’t swat 

at it. Don’t panic! Just blow at it 

gently. It will move. 

If you get stung, have an adult 

remove the stinger as soon as 

To ease the pain and itching, try 

putting one of these on the sting: 

alcohol wipes, or a paste made of 

baking soda and water or meat 

tenderizer and water.
Exhibit
10.5 Screenplay Assignment for Community Challenge

    


    SCREENPLAY
ASSIGNMENT

    


    KNOW ALL
MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that, in consideration of one dollar ($1.00) and other
good and valuable consideration, receipt is hereby acknowledged, the undersigned
Wm. Alan Pezzuto (“Assignor”) does hereby sell, grant convey and assign unto
Asgaard Media (“Assignee”), its successors, assigns and licensees forever, all
right title and interest including but not limited to the exclusive world-wide
Motion Picture and allied rights of the Assignor in and to that certain literary
work to wit: that certain original screenplay written by Wm. Alan Pezzuto
entitled “Community Challenge” hereafter identified as Writers Guild of America,
west (WGAw) Registration number 1283196 which hereto fore may have been written
with the sanction of Assignor.

    


    Dated
This 1st Day of
June, 2008

    


    
      
        
          	
                  /s/Wm.
      Alan Pezzuto

                
	
                  Wm.
      Alan Pezzuto, Assignor

                


        

      

    

     

    AGREED
TO:

    


    
      
        
          	
                  /s/Wm. Alan Pezzuto, On
      behalf of

                
	
                  ASGAARD
      MEDIA

                   Assignee
|   | 1. | I am a duly authorized officer of BMW Financial Services NA, LLC; |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | I have reviewed the terms of that certain Servicing Agreement, dated as of August 30, 1995 (the “Basic Servicing Agreement”), between Financial Services Vehicle Trust (the “Trust”) and BMW Financial Services NA, LLC, as servicer (in such capacity, the “Servicer”), as supplemented by the 2013-1 SUBI Servicing Supplement, dated as of January 24, 2013 (together with the Basic Servicing Agreement, the “Servicing Agreement”), among the Trust, BMW Manufacturing L.P., as grantor and initial beneficiary of the Trust, and BMW Financial Services NA, LLC, as sponsor and as Servicer, and I have made, or have caused to be made under my supervision, a detailed review of the activities of the Servicer and the performance of its obligations thereunder during the period from January 24, 2013 to December 31, 2013; |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 3. | To the best of my knowledge, based on the review described in paragraph 2, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement in all material respects during the period from January 24, 2013 to December 31, 2013, except as set forth below. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | By:      | /s/ Joachim Hensel                          |
|--------|-----------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                              | Name:  Joachim HenselTitle: Vice President – Finance & CFOBMW Financial Services NA, LLC                                                             |
Case 2:06-mc-03334-MHT Document 8 Filed 10/04/2006 Page 1 of 9
Case 2:06-mc-03334-MHT Document 8 Filed 10/04/2006 Page 2 of 9
Case 2:06-mc-03334-MHT Document 8 Filed 10/04/2006 Page 3 of 9
Case 2:06-mc-03334-MHT Document 8 Filed 10/04/2006 Page 4 of 9
Case 2:06-mc-03334-MHT Document 8 Filed 10/04/2006 Page 5 of 9
Case 2:06-mc-03334-MHT Document 8 Filed 10/04/2006 Page 6 of 9
Case 2:06-mc-03334-MHT Document 8 Filed 10/04/2006 Page 7 of 9
Case 2:06-mc-03334-MHT Document 8 Filed 10/04/2006 Page 8 of 9
Case 2:06-mc-03334-MHT Document 8 Filed 10/04/2006 Page 9 of 9