alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 178 

Honoring the life of Betty Shabazz. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 17, 2005 

Mr. RANGEL submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Government Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Honoring the life of Betty Shabazz. 

Whereas the Nation honors Betty Shabazz as a wife, mother, 

educator, and advocate for civil and human rights, 

women, and the poor; 

Whereas Betty Shabazz, through her life and deeds, has been 

an inspiration to people around the world; 

Whereas Betty Shabazz was a woman of strength, resilience, 

perseverance, and grace who overcame the greatest of 

challenges; 

Whereas Betty Shabazz was born Betty Sanders in Detroit, 

Michigan, on May 28, 1936; 

Whereas Betty Shabazz met and married the controversial 

activist and leader El-Hajj Malik El-Shabazz (Malcolm 

X) in New York in 1958; 
2 

•HRES 178 IH 

Whereas on February 21, 1965, while pregnant with twins, 

Betty Shabazz and their four daughters witnessed Malcolm X’s assassination; 

Whereas Betty Shabazz exhibited her resiliency and determination as a single mother, raising and educating her 

six daughters, Attallah, Qubilah, Ilyasah, Gamilah, and 

twins Malikah and Malaak; 

Whereas Betty Shabazz found the time to become certified as 

a registered nurse, and to later earn bachelor’s and master’s degrees and, finally, a doctorate in education administration from the University of Massachusetts; 

Whereas Betty Shabazz joined the administrative staff of 

Medgar Evers College in Brooklyn, New York, rising to 

high positions; 

Whereas, while preserving the public memory of her late husband, Betty Shabazz earned a reputation of her own, as 

an educator, public speaker, and advocate for women, 

education, and civil and human rights; 

Whereas on June 23, 1997, Betty Shabazz succumbed to injuries suffered in a tragic fire; 

Whereas Betty Shabazz personified the roles of wife, mother, 

and professional woman; and 

Whereas Betty Shabazz will be forever remembered for her 

love of family, her commitment to humankind, and for 

the joy and laughter she brought to all those who knew 

her: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives honors 

2 the life of Betty Shabazz. 

Æ
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES 

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION 

DONNA DORSEY DAVIS, etc. ) 

 Plaintiff, ) 

 ) 

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO: 

 ) 2:06CV766-MHT 

RICHARD M. DORSEY, etc., )

and CD&O, LLC, etc., ) 

 Defendants. ) 

MOTION TO EXTEND DISCOVERY DEADLINE 

 NOW COMES, the Plaintiff, by and through her attorney of record, Lindsay B. Erwin, 

and does show unto this Honorable Court the following: 

 1. The discovery deadline in this matter is set for April 3, 2007. 

 2. Plaintiff’s counsel was unable to take the deposition of Defendant, Richard M. 

 Dorsey, until March 13, 2007. During such deposition, Plaintiff learned the names of certain 

individuals who have information relevant to the Plaintiffs claims and defenses in this matter. 

3. Notice of Depositions for Jo Ann Perry, the book keeper for I-65 Properties, Inc., 

George W. Walthall, the attorney who prepared all documentation regarding the formation of I65 Properties, Inc., and Alan Taunton, the certified public accountant for I-65 Properties, Inc., 

was noticed on the 30th of March, 2007 for said depositions to take place on the 16th of April, 

2007. 

4. That in no way will the extension of said deadline effect the date of the trial in 

this matter previously set by this Honorable Court. 

 5. Plaintiff’s counsel can not adequately defend Defendant’s premature Motion for 

Summary Judgment until such time as all relevant information and documentation of discovery 

is complete. 

 WHEREFORE, ABOVE PREMISES CONSIDERED, Plaintiff moves this Honorable 

Court to extend the deadline for discovery for sixty (60) days to allow Plaintiff conduct other 

depositions to obtain information relevant to this matter. 

 Respectfully submitted, 

 //s// Lindsay B. Erwin 

 Lindsay B. Erwin 

 ASB-5299-Y59E 

 Attorney for Plaintiff 

Case 2:06-cv-00766-MHT-TFM Document 25 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 1 of 2
Meacham, Earley & Fowler, P.C. 

5704 Veterans Parkway 

Columbus, Georgia 31904 

(706) 576-4064 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

 I hereby certify that on the _2__ day of April, 2007, I electronically filed the foregoing 

with the Clerk of the Court using electronic filing system which will send information of such 

filing to the following: 

 Clifford W. Cleveland 

 Cleveland & Colley, P.C. 

 P.O. Box 680689 

 Prattville, AL 36068 

 James E. Roberts, Esquire 

 4908 Cahaba River Road, Suite 204 

 Birmingham, AL 35243 

 //s// Lindsay B. Erwin 

 OF COUNSEL 

 

Case 2:06-cv-00766-MHT-TFM Document 25 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 2 of 2
###### Editorial Note on Part 30

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 30 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

#### § 30.37 Application for renewal of licenses.

Application for renewal of a specific license must be filed on NRC Form 313 and in accordance with § 30.32.

[75 FR 73942, Nov. 30, 2010]
#### § 205.285 Effect of failure to file a timely application.

An Application for Refund must be filed no later than the date that the Office of Hearings and Appeals establishes pursuant to § 205.283(b). Any Application that is not filed on a timely basis may be summarily dismissed. The Office of Hearings and Appeals or its designee may, however, grant extensions of time for good cause shown. Any request for an extension of time must generally be submitted in writing prior to the deadline.
#### Alice G. Donenfeld, Respondent, v. Irwin Donenfeld, Appellant.

Order entered October 16, 1969, which granted plaintiff’s motions for temporary alimony and counsel fees and for support of two minor children, unanimously modified on the law and the facts to the extent of reducing the amount of alimony to $600 per week and counsel fees to $7,000; and as so modified the *532order is otherwise affirmed, without costs or disbursements to either party. On the present record, the awards were excessive to the extent indicated. Concur — Stevens, P. J., Eager, Capozzoli and Markewich, JJ.
2007-2236.

#### State v. Hazel.

Franklin App. Nos. 07AP-451 and 07AP-452. On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion denied.

Pfeifer, J., dissents.
Exhibit 31.2.  CERTIFICATION  I, S. E. Parks, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this report of Questar Pipeline Company on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended March 31, 2008;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. [intentionally omitted];  4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and we have:  a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;  c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting.  5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):  a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.    November 6, 2008 /s/S. E. Parks S. E. Parks Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
PGI 225.7703-1 Acquisition procedures.

(c) When issuing solicitations and contracts for performance in Afghanistan, follow the guidance for

CENTCOM Operational Contract Support Policies and Procedures, Theater Business Clearance, at

https://www2.centcom.mil/sites/contracts/Pages/GCO.aspx, and use the applicable solicitation

provisions and contract clauses:

(1) The provision at DFARS 252.232-7014, Notification of Payment in Local Currency (Afghanistan),

as prescribed at DFARS 232.7202.

Parent topic: PGI 225.7703 Enhanced authority to acquire products or services from Afghanistan.
| . 30'
73° 50! +0 =

pmenieeeey ses IPS \ ANS] | VII (WO Wilks#/)

Mae tay Loa DROS eS Desh SO

ao ol eS Sa
i,

pe ROHS jes BOURS ( v
WY Oy fis AN gh

f
Wg

Mes GR SOR De |

7) eg aS OA
ST Ms: eae eA ENS Soe \
OE) yy SN ENN
Lf JLo QI.
iL) fp ee.
COS IS

ie Sag A ( 28S
SHE PAGRO/ 6) J Ne

|e laaco- 42600)
— |i

WILMINGTON. CANYON NE.

CORRECTED METERS SCALE 1:100,000 ; L153

esSi-7

4¥S20 H3GNN Ag HS0uO3H
VINHOJIVS ‘ANIA *  NOUWYOdOD CID NWe
a'r ‘4 guedevvap bur aay
|

@/Qa/: |
Case 3:06-cv-00777-MHT-TFM Document 12 Filed 11/01/2006 Page 1 of 3
Case 3:06-cv-00777-MHT-TFM Document 12 Filed 11/01/2006 Page 2 of 3
Case 3:06-cv-00777-MHT-TFM Document 12 Filed 11/01/2006 Page 3 of 3
Case 3:06-cr-00208-MEF-CSC Document 26 Filed 10/27/2006 Page 1 of 7
Case 3:06-cr-00208-MEF-CSC Document 26 Filed 10/27/2006 Page 2 of 7
Case 3:06-cr-00208-MEF-CSC Document 26 Filed 10/27/2006 Page 3 of 7
Case 3:06-cr-00208-MEF-CSC Document 26 Filed 10/27/2006 Page 4 of 7
Case 3:06-cr-00208-MEF-CSC Document 26 Filed 10/27/2006 Page 5 of 7
Case 3:06-cr-00208-MEF-CSC Document 26 Filed 10/27/2006 Page 6 of 7
Case 3:06-cr-00208-MEF-CSC Document 26 Filed 10/27/2006 Page 7 of 7
Case 3:06-cr-00208-MEF-CSC Document 26-2 Filed 10/27/2006 Page 1 of 1
Case 3:06-cr-00208-MEF-CSC Document 26-3 Filed 10/27/2006 Page 1 of 2
Case 3:06-cr-00208-MEF-CSC Document 26-3 Filed 10/27/2006 Page 2 of 2
Case 3:06-cr-00208-MEF-CSC Document 26-4 Filed 10/27/2006 Page 1 of 2
Case 3:06-cr-00208-MEF-CSC Document 26-4 Filed 10/27/2006 Page 2 of 2
IV 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 21 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives regarding the firefight 

that occurred on March 4, 2007, between members of the United States 

Marine Corps and enemy forces in Bati Kot District, Nangarhar Province, Afghanistan. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 3, 2017 

Mr. JONES submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Armed Services 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives regarding the firefight that occurred on March 4, 2007, between members of the United States Marine Corps and 

enemy forces in Bati Kot District, Nangarhar Province, 

Afghanistan. 

Whereas during the morning of March 4, 2007, 30 Marines 

of Fox Company, Marine Special Operations Command, 

on patrol in Bati Kot District, Nangarhar Province, Afghanistan, were attacked in a complex ambush by enemy 

forces; 

Whereas the Marines of Fox Company responded to the attack with proportionate defensive fire in accordance with 

the existing Rules of Engagement; 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 21 IH 

Whereas, in their response to the ambush, the Marines of 

Fox Company did not engage in the intentional or indiscriminate killing of any civilians; 

Whereas, as commander of Theater Special Operations 

forces, Lieutenant General Frank Kearney prematurely 

decided to expel the entire Marine Special Operations 

Company from Afghanistan notwithstanding their appropriate response to an attack by the enemy; 

Whereas General Kearney skewed public perception regarding 

the incident with his statements, which led to an Inspector General investigation into his actions; 

Whereas, not only was the response by General Kearney unprecedented, but none of the investigations that have 

been completed would warrant such action, and General 

Kearney’s decision damaged the development of the Marine Special Operations Command and the personal livelihood of these Marines; and 

Whereas the Marines conduct during the complex ambush 

was exemplary and reflected the high standards to which 

they were trained: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that the Commandant of the United States 

3 Marine Corps should issue a public document certifying 

4 that members of Fox Company of the Marine Special Op5 erations Command were not at fault in the firefight that 

6 occurred on March 4, 2007, between members of Fox 

7 Company and enemy forces in Bati Kot District, 

8 Nangarhar Province, Afghanistan, and the Marines of Fox 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 21 IH 

1 Company involved in this incident deserve to have their 

2 names cleared. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 10.1










Exhibit 10.1




FORM OF AMENDMENT TO

2005 NONQUALIFIED STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT

UNDER THE BRADY CORPORATION 2004 OMNIBUS INCENTIVE STOCK PLAN

(as amended on February 17, 2010)




The following sets forth an amendment to the August 1, 2005 performance stock option grants
under the Brady Corporation 2004 Omnibus Incentive Stock Plan (the “2005 Grants”).




Section 7 of the 2005 Grants is amended to read as follows:




“This Option shall expire five years after the date on which this Option was granted; provided,
however that if Employee continues in employment through August 1, 2010, the Option shall
thereafter expire upon the earliest of: (a) one year after the date on which the Employee
terminates employment as a result of death, disability or retirement (all as described in
Section 3), (b) the date on which the Employee terminates employment for any other reason or (c)
ten years after the date on which this Option was granted.”
#### In the Matter of Dina Bruemmer, Appellant, v Suffolk County Department of Social Services, Respondent.

[814 NYS2d 551]

*904In a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County (Lehman, J.), entered September 20, 2005, which granted the respondent’s motion to dismiss the petition.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Family Court properly granted the motion to dismiss the appellant’s petition seeking visitation with the subject children. The appellant failed to show fraud, duress, or coercion in connection with her execution of the surrender of the subject children for adoption so as to impair the legal validity of her consent thereto (Social Services Law § 383-c [6] [d]; *see Matter of Sabrina H.,*245 AD2d 1134, 1135 [1997]; *Matter of Commissioner of Social Servs. of Suffolk County [Sandra G.],*141 AD2d 821, 822 [1988]).

The appellant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Crane, J.P., Goldstein, Rivera and Dillon, JJ., concur.
#### LYNCH v. MURPHY.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

December 24, 1914.)

Action by Margaret A. Lynch against Anna Murphy.

No opinion. Motion granted. Order filed. See, also, 150 N. Y. Supp. 1094.
Editorial Note on Part 2
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

§ 2.1507 Oral hearing. ( a ) Not less than five (5) days before the commencement of the oral hearing, the presiding officer shall issue an order setting forth the grouping and order of appearance of the witnesses at the oral hearing. The order shall be filed upon all participants by email or facsimile transmission if possible, otherwise by overnight mail.
( b ) The Commission or presiding officer may question witnesses. Neither the Commission nor the presiding officer will ordinarily permit participants to submit recommended questions for the Commission or presiding officer to propound to witnesses. However, if the Commission or presiding officer believe that the conduct of the oral hearing will be expedited and that consideration of such proposed questions will assist in developing a more focused hearing record, the Commission or presiding officer may, in its discretion, permit the participants to submit recommended questions for the Commission or presiding officer's consideration.
( c ) The Commission or presiding officer may request, or upon request of a participant may, in the presiding officer's discretion, permit the submission of additional information following the close of the oral hearing. Such information must be submitted no later than five (5) days after the close of the oral hearing and must be served at the same time upon all participants at the oral hearing.
Editorial Note on Part 40
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 40 appear at 79 FR 75740, Dec. 19, 2014.

§ 40.66 Requirements for advance notice of export shipments of natural uranium. ( a ) Each licensee authorized to export natural uranium, other than in the form of ore or ore residue, in amounts exceeding 500 kilograms, shall notify the Director, Office of Nuclear Security and Incident Response, by email (preferred method) to *AdvanceNotifications.Resource@nrc.gov* or by an appropriate method listed in § 40.5. The notification must be in writing and must be received at least 10 days before transport of the shipment commences at the shipping facility.
( b ) The notification must include the following information: ( 1 ) The name(s), address(es), and telephone number(s) of the shipper, receiver, and carrier(s);
( 2 ) A physical description of the shipment;
( 3 ) A listing of the mode(s) of shipment, transfer points, and routes to be used;
( 4 ) The estimated date and time that shipment will commence and that each nation (other than the United States) along the route is scheduled to be entered; and
( 5 ) A certification that arrangements have been made to notify the Director, Office of Nuclear Security and Incident Response when the shipment is received at the receiving facility.
( c ) A licensee who needs to amend a notification may do so by telephoning the Director, Office of Nuclear Security and Incident Response, at the numbers for the NRC Headquarters Operations Center listed in Appendix A to part 73 of this chapter.
[52 FR 9651, Mar. 26, 1987, as amended at 53 FR 4110, Feb. 12, 1988; 60 FR 24551, May 9, 1995; 68 FR 58808, Oct. 10, 2003; 69 FR 76600, Dec. 22, 2004; 74 FR 62681, Dec. 1, 2009; 83 FR 58723, Nov. 21, 2018; 86 FR 67842, Nov. 30, 2021]
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Federal Maritime Commission
 Notice is hereby given that the following Ocean Transportation Intermediary licenses have been reissued by the Federal Maritime Commission pursuant to section 19 of the Shipping Act of 1984 (46 U.S.C. chapter 409) and the regulations of the Commission pertaining to the licensing of Ocean Transportation Intermediaries, 46 CFR part 515. License No.
Name/address
Date reissued020208F
Ghanem Forwarding, LLC, 3327 Hollins Ferry Road, Halethorpe, MD 21227
October 20, 2010.020253NF
Concord International Transport, Inc., 10100 NW. 116th Way, Suite 14, Medley, FL 33178
October 22, 2010.020281NF
Freightsolutions LLC dba Freight Solutions dba Santa Cruz Ocean Line, 1775 NW. 70th Avenue, Suite 10, Miami, FL 33126
September 5, 2010.021600N
LTH Logistics, Inc. dba LTH Express, 837 East Sandhill Avenue Carson, CA 90746
October 30, 2010.021890F
Empire Global Logistics, LLC, 160-51 Rockaway Blvd., Suite 206, Jamaica, NY 11434
October 31, 2010.
 Sandra L. Kusumoto, Director, Bureau of Certification and Licensing.


[FR Doc. 2010-30877 Filed 12-7-10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6730-01-P
#### § 490.300 Purpose and Scope.

This subpart implements section 501 of the Act, which requires, subject to some exemptions, that certain annual percentages of new light duty motor vehicles acquired by alternative fuel providers must be alternative fueled vehicles.