alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
PGI 223.7305 Authorization and approval.

The contracting officer shall ensure that the appropriate authorizations from the program executive

office are included in the solicitation and contract. The contracting officer shall forward proposals

submitted by an offeror or requests from a Contractor seeking authorization to use hexavalent

chromium in a deliverable item, to the cognizant program executive office for evaluation and, if

necessary, authorization by the appropriate official.

Parent topic: PGI 223.73 -MINIMIZING THE USE OF MATERIALS CONTAINING HEXAVALENT

CHROMIUM
###### Editorial Note on Part 2

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

#### § 2.641 Filing fees.

Each application which contains a request for limited work authorization under the procedures of § 2.101(a)(9) and this subpart shall be accompanied by any fee required by § 50.30(e) and part 170 of this chapter.
exv10w15






Exhibit 10.15




Summary of 2010 vRad Incentive Compensation Plan



For fiscal year 2010, vRad has adopted an incentive compensation plan, the material terms of which
are summarized as follows:





	 	•	 	The plan provides opportunities to earn incentive compensation to vRad’s executive
officers, directors, and managers.
	 
	 	•	 	The target bonus payment for each individual is tied to his or her position and
level, and may be subject to pro-ration based on the employee’s start date or in-year
promotion.
	 
	 	•	 	Payment of bonus amounts is determined by the funding of a bonus pool, and the
individual’s performance.






	 	•	 	Funding of the bonus pool is based on a scale tied to the
company’s Adjusted EBITDA performance. In determining performance relative to
the scale, the Board of Directors may exclude extraordinary events affecting
financial results (such as acquisitions) or may adjust the scale as it deems
appropriate in its discretion.
	 
	 	•	 	Individual performance is determined by the level achievement
of 3 or 4 personal performance objectives, as established by the employee’s
direct executive team leader, with the exception of the CEO. Incentive
compensation paid to the CEO is based on the company’s Adjusted EBITDA
performance.




To receive the bonus, an employee must be employed through the bonus payment date, which shall be
no later than 60 days after the end of the fiscal year.
Subpart 1213.70—Department of

Transportation Procedures for Acquiring

Training Services

Parent topic: PART 1213—SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION PROCEDURES

1213.7000 Applicability.

(a) DOT policy at 1237.7000 applies to Standard Form (SF) 182, Request, Authorization, Agreement

and Certification of Training, which may be used to acquire training services; however, the policy

does not apply to training services acquired by Governmentwide commercial purchase card. The

Governmentwide commercial purchase card may only be used to acquire training services valued at

the micro-purchase threshold level or less.

(b) As reflected in 1237.7002, this policy does not apply to training attended by DOT employees that

is scheduled and conducted by Government sources of supply, educational institutions, or private

entities where DOT does not control or sponsor the training. Examples of when the policy does and

does not apply include:

(1) When SF 182s are issued for three DOT employees to attend a one-week course at a university or

other private entity, the policy does not apply. DOT does not control the course because the

university or private entity has a contract in place with the training provider and DOT is placing an

order under an existing contract; and

(2) When DOT awards a contract to a university or other private entity to provide training for DOT

and/or other Government personnel, the policy applies. DOT controls this course; therefore, no

soliciting or advertising of private non-Government training while conducting the contracted-for

training is permitted.

1213.7001 Solicitation provision and contract clause.

(a) Contracting officers shall insert the provision as prescribed at 1252.237–71, Certification of Data,

in all solicitations and requests for quotations, and the clause as prescribed at 1252.237–72,

Prohibition on Advertising, in solicitations, requests for quotations, and all contracts (e.g., purchase

orders, SF 182s) for training services when the content and/or presentation of the training is

controlled by DOT.

(b) Contracting officers shall incorporate the successful offeror's certified data into any resultant

contract(s). Certified data may be adopted by reference, if the contracting officer determines it

contains information sufficient to reliably describe the certified data submitted. For example, this

type of information includes dated material such as resumes and company or personnel

qualifications.
Editorial Note on Part 32
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 32 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

§ 32.21a Same: Conditions of license. Each license issued under § 32.21 of this part is subject to the following conditions: ( a ) The immediate container of the capsule(s) must bear a durable, legible label which: ( 1 ) Identifies the radioisotope, the physical and chemical form, the quantity of radioactivity of each capsule at a specific date; and
( 2 ) Bears the words “Radioactive Material.”
( b ) In addition to the labeling information required by paragraph (a) of this section, the label affixed to the immediate container, or an accompanying brochure also must: ( 1 ) State that the contents are exempt from NRC or Agreement State licensing requirements; and
( 2 ) Bears the words “Radioactive Material. For “In Vivo” Diagnostic Use Only. This Material Is Not To Be Used for Research Involving Human Subjects and Must Not Be Introduced into Foods, Beverages, Cosmetics, or Other Drugs or Medicinals, or into Products Manufactured for Commercial Distribution. This Material May Be Disposed of in Ordinary Trash.”
[62 FR 63640, Dec. 2, 1997]
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                  JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                              2,672
<SECURITIES>                                       38,006
<RECEIVABLES>                                           0
<ALLOWANCES>                                            0
<INVENTORY>                                             0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   42,490
<PP&E>                                             26,836
<DEPRECIATION>                                    (13,742)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     58,098
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              21,176
<BONDS>                                             2,200
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0
<PREFERRED>                                           400
<COMMON>                                               25
<OTHER-SE>                                         32,711
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       58,098
<SALES>                                                 0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                      254
<CGS>                                                   0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       8,826
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     (564)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    123
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (8,131)
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (8,131)
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0
<CHANGES>                                               0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (8,131)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (0.36)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       (0.36)



</TABLE>
#### § 171.21 [Reserved]
#### Helen Salichs, Appellant, v Warren James, Respondent.

Submitted July 30, 2007;

decided December 13, 2007

Reported below, Sup Ct, NY County, May 17, 2007 (294 AD2d 160).

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.
Case 2:06-cv-00758-LES-CSC Document 1 Filed 08/24/2006 Page 1 of 39
Case 2:06-cv-00758-LES-CSC Document 1 Filed 08/24/2006 Page 2 of 39
Case 2:06-cv-00758-LES-CSC Document 1 Filed 08/24/2006 Page 3 of 39
Case 2:06-cv-00758-LES-CSC Document 1 Filed 08/24/2006 Page 4 of 39
Case 2:06-cv-00758-LES-CSC Document 1 Filed 08/24/2006 Page 5 of 39
Case 2:06-cv-00758-LES-CSC Document 1 Filed 08/24/2006 Page 6 of 39
Case 2:06-cv-00758-LES-CSC Document 1 Filed 08/24/2006 Page 7 of 39
Case 2:06-cv-00758-LES-CSC Document 1 Filed 08/24/2006 Page 8 of 39
Case 2:06-cv-00758-LES-CSC Document 1 Filed 08/24/2006 Page 9 of 39
Case 2:06-cv-00758-LES-CSC Document 1 Filed 08/24/2006 Page 10 of 39
Case 2:06-cv-00758-LES-CSC Document 1 Filed 08/24/2006 Page 11 of 39
Case 2:06-cv-00758-LES-CSC Document 1 Filed 08/24/2006 Page 12 of 39
Case 2:06-cv-00758-LES-CSC Document 1 Filed 08/24/2006 Page 13 of 39
Case 2:06-cv-00758-LES-CSC Document 1 Filed 08/24/2006 Page 14 of 39
Case 2:06-cv-00758-LES-CSC Document 1 Filed 08/24/2006 Page 15 of 39
Case 2:06-cv-00758-LES-CSC Document 1 Filed 08/24/2006 Page 16 of 39
Case 2:06-cv-00758-LES-CSC Document 1 Filed 08/24/2006 Page 17 of 39
Case 2:06-cv-00758-LES-CSC Document 1 Filed 08/24/2006 Page 18 of 39
Case 2:06-cv-00758-LES-CSC Document 1 Filed 08/24/2006 Page 19 of 39
Case 2:06-cv-00758-LES-CSC Document 1 Filed 08/24/2006 Page 20 of 39
Case 2:06-cv-00758-LES-CSC Document 1 Filed 08/24/2006 Page 21 of 39
Case 2:06-cv-00758-LES-CSC Document 1 Filed 08/24/2006 Page 22 of 39
Case 2:06-cv-00758-LES-CSC Document 1 Filed 08/24/2006 Page 23 of 39
Case 2:06-cv-00758-LES-CSC Document 1 Filed 08/24/2006 Page 24 of 39
Case 2:06-cv-00758-LES-CSC Document 1 Filed 08/24/2006 Page 25 of 39
Case 2:06-cv-00758-LES-CSC Document 1 Filed 08/24/2006 Page 26 of 39
Case 2:06-cv-00758-LES-CSC Document 1 Filed 08/24/2006 Page 27 of 39
Case 2:06-cv-00758-LES-CSC Document 1 Filed 08/24/2006 Page 28 of 39
Case 2:06-cv-00758-LES-CSC Document 1 Filed 08/24/2006 Page 29 of 39
Case 2:06-cv-00758-LES-CSC Document 1 Filed 08/24/2006 Page 30 of 39
Case 2:06-cv-00758-LES-CSC Document 1 Filed 08/24/2006 Page 31 of 39
Case 2:06-cv-00758-LES-CSC Document 1 Filed 08/24/2006 Page 32 of 39
Case 2:06-cv-00758-LES-CSC Document 1 Filed 08/24/2006 Page 33 of 39
Case 2:06-cv-00758-LES-CSC Document 1 Filed 08/24/2006 Page 34 of 39
Case 2:06-cv-00758-LES-CSC Document 1 Filed 08/24/2006 Page 35 of 39
Case 2:06-cv-00758-LES-CSC Document 1 Filed 08/24/2006 Page 36 of 39
Case 2:06-cv-00758-LES-CSC Document 1 Filed 08/24/2006 Page 37 of 39
Case 2:06-cv-00758-LES-CSC Document 1 Filed 08/24/2006 Page 38 of 39
Case 2:06-cv-00758-LES-CSC Document 1 Filed 08/24/2006 Page 39 of 39
Case 1:06-cv-00775-TFM Document 9 Filed 09/18/2006 Page 1 of 1
Plaintiff did not submit any evidentiary submissions contemporaneous with the filing of her

1

motion nor her response. While Plaintiff purports to rely upon Defendant’s evidentiary submissions,

she refers to portions of depositions which Defendants did not submit into evidence.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

DONNA DORSEY DAVIS, :

as an individual and derivatively upon :

behalf of I-65 Properties, Inc., :

:

Plaintiff, :

:

vs. : Case No. 2:06-cv-766-MHT

:

RICHARD M. DORSEY, as an individual :

and CD&O, LLC, as a necessary party, :

:

Defendants. :

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO STRIKE

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

COME NOW Richard M. Dorsey and CD&O, LLC, Defendants in the above-styled cause, and

move this Court to strike Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment as untimely. In support of this

motion, Defendants rely on the following:

1. Pursuant to Section 2 of this Court’s Uniform Scheduling Order dated November 2,

2006, dispositive motions were to be filed no later than ninety days prior to the

pretrial hearing, or March 19, 2007.

2. Defendants timely filed their Motion for Summary Judgment on March 19, 2007.

3. On April 9, 2006, Plaintiff filed both a Motion for Summary Judgment and a separate

Response in Opposition to Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment and in the

Alternative, Brief in Support of Plaintiff’s Cross Memorandum Brief in Support of

Motion for Summary Judgment.

1

Case 2:06-cv-00766-MHT-TFM Document 34 Filed 04/11/2007 Page 1 of 2
Plaintiff’s alternative party-designations have been omitted. 2

2

4. The body of the latter document is specifically divided into two sections, “Reply to

Defendant’s Arguments and Conclusions of Law” and “Plaintiff’s Cross Claim for

Summary Judgment on Defendant’s Counterclaim”.2

5. To the extent that Plaintiff now seeks to file a dispositive motion in this matter, such

is due to be stricken as untimely filed.

Wherefore the premises having been considered, Defendants respectfully request the Court

to strike Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment as untimely, or in the alternative, grant

Defendants the opportunity to respond to said motion.

Respectfully Submitted this 11 day of April, 2007. th

RICHARD M. DORSEY, as an individual, and

CD&O, LLC, as a necessary party,

/s/ Clifford W. Cleveland 

CLIFFORD W. CLEVELAND 

OF COUNSEL:

CLEVELAND & COLLEY, P.C.

744 East Main Street

Prattville, AL 36067

(334) 365-1500 phone

(334) 365-1601 fax

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that I have electronically filed the foregoing Defendants’ Motion to Strike

Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment with the Clerk of the Court for the United States District

Court, for the Middle District of Alabama, Northern Division, using the CM/ECF system which will

send notification of such filing to Lindsay B. Erwin, Esquire (lindsayerwin@gmail.com) and James

Edward Roberts, Esquire (attyjuris@aol.com) this the 11 day of April, 2007. th

/s/ Clifford W. Cleveland 

OF COUNSEL

Case 2:06-cv-00766-MHT-TFM Document 34 Filed 04/11/2007 Page 2 of 2
#### Robert C. Conway, Respondent, v S. Catherine Conway, Appellant.

[815 NYS2d 233]

In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the defendant appeals from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Baisley, Jr., J.), entered July 7, 2003, as, after a nonjury trial, awarded her only one half of the sum of $71,273 representing her share of the plaintiffs business, directed her to pay one half of the parties’ tax obligation, and directed her to pay 75% of the plaintiffs attorney and expert fees.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court correctly determined that the defendant is hable for one half of the parties’ tax obligation arising out of the failure to pay proper income taxes during their marriage. Since the defendant shared equally in the benefits derived from the failure to pay, she must share in the financial liability aris*726ing out of tax liability *(see Capasso v Capasso,*129 AD2d 267 [1987]).

Contrary to the defendant’s contention on appeal, the award of attorney and expert fees was proper. The court’s direction that the defendant pay 75% of the plaintiffs attorney fees and expert fees was a provident exercise of its discretion *(see*Domestic Relations Law § 237 [a]; *DeCabrera v Cabrera-Rosete,*70 NY2d 879, 881 [1987]; *D’Amato v D'Amato,*198 AD2d 255 [1993]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Schmidt, J.P., Krausman, Mastro and Covello, JJ., concur.
IV 

House Calendar No. 81 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 401 

[Report No. 109–214] 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 3514) to provide an extension 

of highway, highway safety, motor carrier safety, transit, and other 

programs funded out of the Highway Trust Fund pending enactment 

of a law reauthorizing the Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 29 (legislative day, JULY 28), 2005 

Mrs. CAPITO, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; 

which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 3514) to provide 

an extension of highway, highway safety, motor carrier 

safety, transit, and other programs funded out of the 

Highway Trust Fund pending enactment of a law reauthorizing the Transportation Equity Act for the 21st 

Century. 

1 Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution 

2 it shall be in order without intervention of any point of 

3 order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 3514) to 
2 

HRES 401 RH 

1 provide an extension of highway, highway safety, motor 

2 carrier safety, transit, and other programs funded out of 

3 the Highway Trust Fund pending enactment of a law re4 authorizing the Transportation Equity Act for the 21st 

5 Century. All points of order against the bill and against 

6 its consideration are waived. The bill shall be considered 

7 as read. The previous question shall be considered as or8 dered on the bill to final passage without intervening mo9 tion except: (1) ten minutes of debate on the bill equally 

10 divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking mi11 nority member of the Committee on Transportation and 

12 Infrastructure; and (2) one motion to recommit. 

House Calendar No. 81 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 401 

[Report No. 109–214] 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 3514) 

Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century. pending enactment of a law reauthorizing the grams funded out of the Highway Trust Fund ty, motor carrier safety, transit, and other proto provide an extension of highway, highway safeJULY 29 (legislative day, JULY 28), 2005 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed
#### § 1049.1 Purpose.

The purpose of these guidelines is to set forth internal Department of Energy (DOE) security policies and procedures regarding the exercise of arrest authority and the use of force by DOE employees and DOE contractor and subcontractor employees while discharging their official duties pursuant to section 661 of the Department of Energy Organization Act.
2122.170 Contract clauses.

The provisions at FAR sections 52.222-21, 52.222-22, 52-222.25 are implemented by changing the

word “offeror” to “Contractor” and the word “solicitation” to “contract” wherever they appear in the

text to reflect the FEGLI Program's statutory exemption from competitive bidding (5 U.S.C. 8709),

which obviates the issuance of solicitations.

Parent topic: Subpart 2122.1 - Basic Labor Policies
PGI 206.302-1 Only one responsible source

and no other supplies or services will satisfy

agency requirements.

(d) Limitations. When utilizing the authority at FAR 6.302-1, the contracting officer shall post a

request for information or a sources sought notice, and shall include the results of this inquiry in the

justification required by FAR 6.303. This requirement to post may be waived by the Head of the

Contracting Activity, or designee. The waiver authority may not be delegated lower than a general or

flag officer or a member of the Senior Executive Service.

Parent topic: PGI 206.302 Circumstances permitting other than full and open competition.
2848.201 Clauses for supply or service

contracts.

The HCA or designee is the agency head for purposes of FAR 48.201(a)(6).

Parent topic: Subpart 2848.2 - Contract Clauses
#### DEEGAN, Appellant, v. NEWTON, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

June 5, 1914.)

Action by John Deegan, an infant, etc., against Homer C. Newton.

No opinion. The appellant has failed to show any merits, as required by the special rule of this court adopted. January, 1910. See, also, Schorr v. Weisfeld, 147 N. Y. S. 477, decided May 8, 1914. Decision of the motion held for one week for the presentation of proper papers. See, also, 147 N. Y. Supp. 1106; 148 N. Y. Supp. 1112.
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
You havereached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC)Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC.Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of catalogingand locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications.  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the eventthat publications are no longer available from the original publishing agencysite. (Historical purposes)
**Title:Results from the National Household Survey on Drug Abuse**** 
SuDocNumber: HE 20.417/5:
ItemNumber: 0497-D-39 (online)
CGPSystem Number: 000596577
 
2001
Vol. 1- cover.pdfch1.pdfch2.pdfch3.pdfch4.pdfch5.pdfch6.pdfch7.pdfch8.pdfch9.pdf
 
 
Vol. 2- 01SOFvolII_appA-D_W.pdf01SOFvolII_appE-H_W.pdf
 
 
Vol. 3- FrontMatter_W.pdf
 **
#### § 39.11 Application for a specific license.

A person, as defined in § 30.4 of this chapter, shall file an application for a specific license authorizing the use of licensed material in well logging on Form NRC 313, “Application for Material License.” Each application for a license, other than a license exempted from part 170 of this chapter, must be accompanied by the fee prescribed in § 170.31 of this chapter. The application must be sent to the appropriate NRC Regional Office listed in appendix D of part 20 of this chapter.
###### Editorial Note on Part 4

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 4 appear at 77 FR 39904, July 6, 2012.

#### § 4.551 Program accessibility: New construction and alterations.

Each building or part of a building that is constructed or altered by, on behalf of, or for the use of the agency shall be designed, constructed, or altered so as to be readily accessible to and usable by disabled persons. The definitions, requirements, and standards of the Architectural Barriers Act (42 U.S.C. 4151-4157), as established in 41 CFR 101-19.600 to 101-19.607, apply to buildings covered by this section.