alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
PGI 232.7004 Contract clause instructions.

(b)(1) The clause 252.232-7006, Wide Area WorkFlow Payment Instructions, shall be located in the

contract administration section of the contract (e.g., Section G).

(2) Complete paragraph (f)(1)(ii)(A) of the clause, if applicable, by inserting one of the following

document types appropriate to the work being performed:

(i) Invoice and Receiving Report.

(ii) Navy Shipbuilding Invoice—Fixed Price.

(iii) Reparables Receiving Report (for repair services).

(iv) Energy Invoice and Energy Receiving Report.

(3) Complete paragraph (f)(1)(ii)(B) of the clause, if applicable, by inserting one of the following

document types appropriate to the work being performed:

(i) Invoice and Receiving Report.

(ii) Invoice 2-in-1 (Services only).

(iii) Construction and Facilities Management Invoice.

(iv) Navy Construction/Facilities Management Invoice.

(v) Telecom Invoice (Contractual).

(4) Do not use the Combo selection for a receiving report.

(i) Inspection location: (select either “Source,” “Destination,” or “Other”).

(ii) Acceptance location: (select either “Source,” “Destination,” or “Other”).

(5) Complete paragraph (f)(3) of the clause before contract award. Selection of applicable DoDAACs

is dependent on the document type and the entitlement system used by the DoD Component.

(i) To determine applicable DoDAACs, use the guidance for WAWF payment instructions at

https://piee.eb.mil/.

(ii) If a DoDAAC field is not listed in paragraph (f)(3) Routing Data Table, select “Other DoDAAC(s)”

and list the DoDAAC field name(s) as they appear in the WAWF system and applicable DoDAAC(s).

(iii) When multiple “Ship to” and inspection/acceptance locations” (i.e. DoDAACs) exist, enter “See

schedule.” The corresponding schedule in the contract/order must cite all applicable DoDAACs.

(iv) Validate DoDAACs using the following resources:

(A) For inspector, acceptor and local processing office roles, use https://piee.eb.mil/ and click on the

“Active DoDAACs & Roles link” in the “Help” section on the home page to validate active DoDAACs

and user roles in WAWF.
(B) For all other DoDAACs, use https://www.daas.dla.mil/daasinq/.

(6) Complete paragraph (g) by entering the WAWF point of contact information for the contracting

activity, if applicable. List parties to be notified of document submission.

Parent topic: PGI 232.70 -ELECTRONIC SUBMISSION AND PROCESSING OF PAYMENT

REQUESTS AND RECEIVING REPORTS
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-15-00216-CR

Andrewnik Thomas

v.

The State of Texas §

§

§

§

§ From County Criminal Court No. 1

of Denton County (CR-2014-08535-A)

July 14, 2016

Opinion by Chief Justice Livingston

(nfp)



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

there was no error in the tria l court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Terrie Livingston

Chief Justice Terrie Livingston
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         443,350
<SECURITIES>                                   874,293
<RECEIVABLES>                                  607,464
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,328,455
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,931,320
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           59,354
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       87,477,847
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,931,320
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               112,681
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               158,726
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (46,045)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (46,045)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
PART 734—MAJOR SYSTEM ACQUISITION

Authority: Sec. 621, Pub. L. 87–195, 75 Stat. 445 (22 U.S.C. 2381), as amended; E.O. 12163, Sept.

29, 1979, 44 FR 56673, 3 CFR, 1979 Comp., p. 435.

734.002-70 USAID policy.

Parent topic: SUBCHAPTER F—SPECIAL CATEGORIES OF CONTRACTING

734.002-70 USAID policy.

In order for an USAID acquisition to be considered a major system acquisition it must meet the

criteria of OMB Circular A–109 and FAR part 34, and must have an estimated value of $15 million or

more during the first year of the contract. All major systems acquisition must be approved in

advance by the M/OAA Director.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22

- 6568

JAMES R. HEUSS, II,
Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v. ELIZABETH A. HILL, Executive Director; CARLOS DEL TORO, Secretary of the Navy,
Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Alexandria

. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. ( 1:21

- cv - 00662

- LMB

- JFA )

Submitted : June 9, 2023 Decided: September 5, 2023

Before AGEE and RUSHING , Circuit Judges , and MOTZ, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
James R. Heuss, II , Appellant Pro Se. Matthew James Mezger , OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY , Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 22-6568 Doc: 22 Filed: 09/05/2023 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM: James R. Heuss, II , appeals the district court’s order awarding summary judgment
to the defendants on his claims under the Administrative Pr ocedure Act, 5 U.S.C. §§ 701

- 706, and the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment. We have reviewed the
record and discern no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court ’s order

. Heuss v. Hill , 1:21

- cv - 00662

- LMB

- JFA (E.D. Va. Feb. 28, 2022). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED USCA4 Appeal: 22-6568 Doc: 22 Filed: 09/05/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
# Subpart 2809.2 - Qualifications Requirements

**Parent topic:**PART 2809 - CONTRACTOR QUALIFICATIONS

## 2809.202 Policy.

The HCA or designee is the agency head for the purposes of FAR 9.202(a)(1).
FINANCING STATEMENT                                     Identifying File No.____

ALL INFORMATION MUST BE TYPEWRITTEN OR PRINTED IN INK. 
                                                      SIGNATURES MUST BE IN INK.

If transaction or transactions wholly or partially subject to 
recordation tax indicate amount of taxable debt here. $__________ .

This  financing  statement  dated  6/10/97 is presented to a filing  officer for
filing pursuant to Uniform Commercial Code.

1.   DEBTOR

     Name              Rent A Wreck of America, Inc.
         ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
     Address    11460 Cronridge Drive, Suite 120, Owings Mills, Maryland  21117
              -----------------------------------------------------------------

2.   SECURED PARTY

     Name              The Chase Manhattan Bank
         ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
     Address           200 Jericho Quadrangle, Jericho, NY   11753
             ------------------------------------------------------------------
             Person and Address to whom Statement is to be Returned if Different
             from above.

3.   Maturity date of obligation (if any)      5/31/2002
                                         --------------------------------------
4.   This financing statement covers the following types (or items) of property:
     (List)

     All present and future accounts, contract rights,  instruments,  documents,
     and chattel paper, all returned and repossessed goods relating thereto, all
     proceeds thereof,  and all books,  records,  and other property relating to
     any of the foregoing.



                         CHECK |X| THE LINES WHICH APPLY

5.   |_| (If collateral is crops)  The above described crops are growing or  are
         to be grown on: (describe estate)


     |_| (If collateral is goods which are or are to  become fixtures) The above
         described goods are affixed or to be affixed to: (describe real estate)

     |_| (Proceeds of collateral are also covered)

     |_| (Products of collateral are also covered)


/s/Kenneth L. Blum,Jr. - President
--------------------------------------
(Signature of Debtor)

    Rent A Wreck of America, Inc.
--------------------------------------
Type of Print Above Name on Above Line

                                               Signature Illegible - VP   
--------------------------------------       -----------------------------------
(Signature of Debtor)                           (Signature of Secured Party)


                                                The Chase Manhattan Bank
--------------------------------------       -----------------------------------
Type or Print Above Signature on Above Line     Type or Print Above Signature on
                                                Above Line
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18
- 6800

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. DEMETRIOUS ADONIS MOORE, a/k/a Meechie , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Greenville

. Henry M. Herlong, Jr. , Senior District Judge. ( 6:08

- cr - 00124

- HMH

- 1; 6:13

- cv - 01236

- HMH )

Submitted : August 23 , 2018 Decided: August 28, 2018

Before DUNCAN and FLOYD , Circuit Judges , and HAMILTON , Senior Circuit Judge

.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. Demetrious Adonis Moore, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Demetrious Adonis Moore seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(6) motion seeking relief from its prior order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion . The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues

a cer tificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on t he merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322,
336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a con stitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at
484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Moore has not made the requisite showing. Although Moore contended that his Rule 60(b) motion was a “true” Rule 60(b) motion, the motion effective ly “attack[ed] the substance of the [district] court’s resolution of a [ § 2255 ] claim on the merits , ” and thus was the functional equivalent of a successive § 2255 motion. United States v. McRae , 793 F.3d 392, 397 (4th Cir. 20 15 ) (internal quotation marks omitted) ; s ee Gonzalez v. Crosby , 545 U.S. 524, 531

- 32 (2005) ( distinguishing between true Rule 60(b) motion and unauthorized successive habeas corpus petition); United States v. Winestock , 340 F.3d 200, 207 (4th3 Cir. 2003) (same) . In the absence of pref iling authorization from this court, the district court lacked jurisdiction to consider a successive § 2255 motion. See 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3) (2012). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral arg ument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process. DISMISSED
cytx-ex433_277.htm



 

Exhibit 4.33



 



 

The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this certificate, shall be construed as though they were written out in full according to applicable laws or  regulations:

 


	
TEN COM
	
-
	
as tenants in common
	
 
	
UNIF GIFT MIN ACT
	
-
	
....................Custodian......................

	
TEN ENT
	
-
	
as tenants by the entireties
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
           (Cust)                                 (Minor)                     

	
JT TEN
	
-
	
as joint tenants with right of survivorship and not as tenants in common
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
under Uniform Gifts to Minors

Act........................................................................

                                  (State)                                         




Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list.

For Value Received,_________________________________hereby sell, assign and transfer unto

PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER

IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE


	
	
 




 

 

(PLEASE PRINT ORTYPE NAME AND ADDRESS, INCLUDING ZIP CODE, OFASSIGNEE)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


	
 
	
Shares

	
of the stock represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
Attomey

	
to transfer the said stock on the books of the within named Corporation with full power of substitution in the premises.

	
 

	
Dated
	
 
	
 
	
 




 


	
 
	
 

	
 
	
NOTICE: THE SIGNATURE TO THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME AS WRITI EN UPON THE FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE IN EVERYPARTICULAR,  WITHOUT ALTERATIONOR ENLARGEMENT OR ANY CHANGE Wl<ATSOEVER.

	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 

	
Signature(s) Guaranteed
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
 

	
By _____________________________________________________________________

The Signature(s) must be guaranteed by an eligible guarantor institution (Banks, Stockbrokers,

Savings  and Loan Associations and Credit Unions withmembershipin anapproved Signature

Guarantee Medallion Program), pursuant to SEC Rule 17Ad-15.
	
 




 

 

 

 

 

 

THE CORPORATION WILLFURNISH TOANY STOCKHOLDER, UPON REQUEST AND WITHOUT CHARGE, A FULLSTATEMENTOF THE DESIGNATIONS, RELATIVE RIGHTS, PREFERENCES ANO LIMITATIONS OF THE SHARES OF EACH CLASS ANO SERIESAUTHORIZED TO BE ISSUED, SO FAR AS THE SAME HAVE BEEN DETERMINED, ANO OF THE AUTHORITY. IF ANY, OF THE BOARD TO DIVIDE THE SHARES INTO CLASSES OR SERIES ANO TO DETERMINE AND CHANGE THE RELATIVE RIGHTS, PREFERENCES AND LIMITATIONS OF ANY CLASS OR SERIES. SUCH REQUEST MAY BE MADE TO THE SECRETARY OF THE CORPORATION OR TO THE TRANSFER AGENT NAMED ON THIS CERTIFICATE

COLUMBIA PRINTING SERVICE,S L LC. www.stockinformation.com
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 128 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 128

          Recognizing the 250th anniversary of Laredo, Texas.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 1, 2005

 Mr. Cuellar (for himself, Mr. Barton of Texas, Mr. Culberson, Mr. Al 
    Green of Texas, Mr. McCaul of Texas, Mr. Conaway, Mr. Paul, Mr. 
 Hinojosa, Mr. Edwards, Mr. Neugebauer, Mr. Gonzalez, Mr. Bonilla, Mr. 
      Doggett, Mr. Ortiz, Ms. Eddie Bernice Johnson of Texas, Mr. 
     Butterfield, and Mr. Smith of Texas) submitted the following 
  resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
          Recognizing the 250th anniversary of Laredo, Texas.

Whereas in 2005, Laredo, Texas, one of the oldest cities in the United States, 
        will celebrate the 250th anniversary of its founding;
Whereas over the span of its history, Laredo has been ruled under seven flags, 
        including the flags of France, Spain, Mexico, the Republic of Rio 
        Grande, Texas, the Confederacy, and the United States;
Whereas in 1755, Spanish settlers founded Laredo as a Spanish settlement, and in 
        1840, for 11 months, Laredo became its own nation, the Republic of 
        Grande;
Whereas in 1845, the annexation of Texas by the United States led to the 
        declaration of war against Mexico and to the signing of the Treaty of 
        Guadalupe Hidalgo, under which Laredo officially became part of Texas, 
        where it remains a proud part of the rich history of the State of Texas;
Whereas today, located at the center of the primary trade route connecting 
        Canada, the United States, and Mexico, Laredo is the most important 
        inland port of the United States, a gateway to increased trade with 
        Mexico, and the fastest growing city east of the Rocky Mountains;
Whereas known today as both the city under seven flags and the gateway city, 
        Laredo has greatly benefited from its colorful history and culture, and 
        its urban core continues to be reinvigorated as commercial areas, 
        residential communities, and diverse populations make this city their 
        home; and
Whereas starting on January 16, 2005, and ending in December 2005, Laredo will 
        celebrate its achievements, history, and culture with a yearlong 
        anniversary celebration: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved,  That the House of Representatives recognizes the 250th 
anniversary of Laredo, Texas.
                                 <all>
```
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

JOHN DAVID TORRES,

Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-19-00209-CR

Appeal from the

County Criminal Court No. 4

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 20180C01479)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the 

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. This decision shall be certified 

below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 4TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2021.

GINA M. PALAFOX, Justice

Before Rodriguez, C.J., Palafox, and Alley, JJ.

Alley, J., concurring
Editorial Note on Part 2
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

§ 2.817 Withdrawal of application. ( a ) The Commission may permit an applicant to withdraw an application for a standard design certification before the issuance of a notice of proposed rulemaking on such terms and conditions as the Commission may prescribe, or may, on receiving a request for withdrawal of an application, deny the application or dismiss it without prejudice. The NRC will publish in the Federal Register a document withdrawing the application, if the notice of receipt of the application, an advance notice of proposed rulemaking, or a notice of proposed rulemaking for the standard design certification has been previously published in the Federal Register. If the notice of receipt, advance notice of proposed rulemaking or notice of proposed rulemaking was published on the NRC Web site, then the notice of action on the withdrawal will also be published on the NRC Web site.
( b ) The withdrawal of an application does not authorize the removal of any document from the files of the Commission.
[72 FR 49482, Aug. 28, 2007]
H. Res. 140

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

March 9, 2005.

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule

XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of

the bill (H.R. 3) to authorize funds for Federal-aid highways,

highway safety programs, and transit programs, and for

other purposes. The first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. All points of order against consideration of the

bill are waived. General debate shall be confined to the bill

and shall not exceed two hours and 20 minutes, with two

hours and 10 minutes equally divided and controlled by the

chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on

Transportation and Infrastructure, including a final period of

10 minutes following consideration of the bill for amendment,

and 10 minutes equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on

Ways and Means. The amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on Transportation
2

•HRES 140 EH

and Infrastructure now printed in the bill, modified by the

amendment printed in part A of the report of the Committee

on Rules accompanying this resolution, shall be considered as

adopted in the House and in the Committee of the Whole.

The bill, as amended, shall be considered as the original bill

for the purpose of further amendment under the five-minute

rule and shall be considered as read. All points of order

against provisions in the bill, as amended, are waived. No

further amendment shall be in order except those printed in

part B of the report of the Committee on Rules or except

pursuant to a subsequent order of the House. Each amendment in part B may be offered only in the order printed in

the report, may be offered only by a Member designated in

the report, shall be considered as read, shall be debatable for

the time specified in the report equally divided and controlled

by the proponent and an opponent, and shall not be subject

to amendment or demand for division of the question in the

House or in the Committee of the Whole. All points of order

against amendments in part B are waived. After disposition

of the amendments in part B, the Committee shall rise with-
3

•HRES 140 EH

out motion. No further consideration of the bill shall be in

order except pursuant to a subsequent order of the House.

Attest:

Clerk.
120 STAT. 1768 PUBLIC LAW 109–328—OCT. 12, 2006

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 4674:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 152 (2006):

May 2, considered and passed House.

Sept. 29, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 109–328

109th Congress

An Act

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 110 North

Chestnut Street in Olathe, Kansas, as the ‘‘Governor John Anderson, Jr. Post

Office Building’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

The facility of the United States Postal Service located at

110 North Chestnut Street in Olathe, Kansas, shall be known

and designated as the ‘‘Governor John Anderson, Jr. Post Office

Building’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the facility referred to

in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Governor

John Anderson, Jr. Post Office Building’’.

Approved October 12, 2006.

Oct. 12, 2006

[H.R. 4674]