alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 32.1CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

** **      In connection with the quarterlyreport of CNB Corporation on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2008 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, W.Jennings Duncan, President and Chief Executive Officer of CNB Corporation,certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:
| 1. | The  above-listed Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)  or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                 |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|    |                                                                                                                                                                    |
| 2. | The  information contained in the above-listed Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all  material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the  Company. |
| Date:   August 8, 2008 | /s/W. Jennings Duncan                     W. Jennings  Duncan  President and Chief Executive Officer |
|-----------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                             |                                                                                                                                                                                                               |
Exhibit 33.2



|                     |                   |                     
|-------------------- | ----------------- | --------------------
|LOGO                 |                   | Glen A. Messina     
|                     | President and CEO
|                     |                  
|                     |                   | Tel: (856) 917-6847 
|                     |                   | Fax: (856) 917-6145 
|3000 Leadenhall Road |                   | glen.messina@phh.com
|                     |                   | www.phh.com         
|Mt. Laurel, NJ 08054 |                   |                     





REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH REGULATION AB

SERVICING CRITERIA

PHH Mortgage
Corporation (the Asserting Party) is responsible for assessing compliance as of December 31, 2014 and for the period from January 1, 2014 through December 31, 2014 (the Reporting Period) with the servicing
criteria set forth in Section 229.1122(d) of the Code of Federal Regulations (the CFR), except for criteria set forth in Section 229.1122(d)(3)(i)(c), (d)(4)(xv) and (d)(1)(iii) of the CFR, which the Asserting Party has
concluded are not applicable to the servicing activities it performs with respect to the transactions covered by this report (the Applicable Servicing Criteria). The criteria set forth in Section 229.1122 (d)(2)(i), (d)(2)(ii),
(d)(4)(iv), (d)(4)(vii), (d)(4)(viii) and (d)(4)(xi) of the CFR are performed by outsource providers on behalf of the Asserting Party; however, the Asserting Party has monitored the outsourcing of these criteria and assumes responsibility for
compliance. The transactions covered by this report include all non-agency loan sale agreements executed after January 1, 2006 as well as all re-securitization transactions after January 1, 2006 for which the Asserting Party served as
servicer (the Platform).

The Asserting Party has assessed its compliance with the Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2014 and for the
Reporting Period and has concluded that the Asserting Party has complied, in all material respects, with the Applicable Servicing Criteria with respect to the Platform taken as a whole.

Deloitte & Touche, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on the assessment of compliance with the
Servicing Criteria for the Reporting Period as set forth in this assertion.

PHH Mortgage Corporation

Date: February 26, 2015



|                                       |  | 
|-------------------------------------- |  | 
|/s/ Glen A. Messina                   
|Glen A. Messina                       
|President                             
|                                      
|/s/ Martin L. Foster                  
|Martin L. Foster                      
|Senior Vice President  Loan Servicing
#### § 50.42 Additional standard for class 103 licenses.

In determining whether a class 103 license will be issued to an applicant, the Commission will, in addition to applying the standards set forth in § 50.40, consider whether the proposed activities will serve a useful purpose proportionate to the quantities of special nuclear material or source material to be utilized.

[73 FR 44620, July 31, 2008]
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

FARMERS 

TELECOMMUNICATIONS 

COOPERATIVE, INC.,

Plaintiff,

v.

VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS, 

INC., VERIZON BUSINESS, QWEST 

COMMUNICATIONS 

INTERNATIONAL, INC., and 

Fictitious Defendants A,B, C, and D,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CIVIL ACTION NO.

CV-06-790-VPM

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

Leigh Anne Hodge of Balch & Bingham LLP, gives notice of her

appearance as counsel of record for Defendant Qwest Communications 

Corporation, improperly named in the complaint as Qwest Communications 

International, Inc. 

Case 2:06-cv-00790-WC Document 9 Filed 12/11/2006 Page 1 of 3
2

s/Leigh Anne Hodge

Leigh Anne Hodge

Attorney for Defendant, Qwest 

Communications Corporation

BALCH & BINGHAM LLP

Post Office Box 306 

Birmingham, AL 35201-0306

Telephone: (205) 251-8100

Facsimile: (205) 488-5698

E-mail: lhodge@balch.com

Case 2:06-cv-00790-WC Document 9 Filed 12/11/2006 Page 2 of 3
3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of the 

Court using the CM/ECF system and service will be perfected upon the following 

this the 11th day of December, 2006:

Dana H. Billingsley

Jonathan Michael Hooks

Mark Douglas Wilkerson

Wilkerson & Bryan, P.C.

405 South Hull Street

P. O. Box 830

Montgomery, AL 36104

Patrick H. Tate

P. O. Box 680593

Fort Payne, AL 35968

Bryan Oxford Balogh

Starnes & Atchison

P. O. Box 598512

Birmingham, AL 35259-8512

Jana Eisinger

Qwest Services Corporation

1801 California Street

Suite 900

Denver, CO 80202

s/Leigh Anne Hodge

Attorney for Defendant, Qwest 

Communications Corporation

BALCH & BINGHAM LLP

Post Office Box 306 

Birmingham, AL 35201-0306

Telephone: (205) 251-8100

Facsimile: (205) 488-5698

E-mail: lhodge@balch.com

Case 2:06-cv-00790-WC Document 9 Filed 12/11/2006 Page 3 of 3
Case 1:06-cv-00737-WKW-SRW Document 7 Filed 09/20/2006 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:06-cv-00737-WKW-SRW Document 7 Filed 09/20/2006 Page 2 of 2
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

BERTHA ALLEN, #134004, )

)

 Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:06-CV-772-WKW

 )

TALLAPOOSA COUNTY JAIL STAFF, )

 )

 Defendants. )

ORDER ON MOTION

Upon consideration of the motion to withdraw as counsel for the defendants filed by

Amanda Kay Morgan on January 3, 2007 (Court Doc. No.15), and for good cause shown, it

is

ORDERED that the motion to withdraw be and is hereby GRANTED. 

Done this 9th day of January, 2007.

 /s/ Terry F. Moorer 

TERRY F. MOORER 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-00772-WKW-TFM Document 16 Filed 01/09/2007 Page 1 of 1
```

[109th Congress Public Law 403]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ403.109]

[[Page 120 STAT. 2755]]

Public Law 109-403
109th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
1501 South Cherrybell Avenue in Tucson, Arizona, as the ``Morris K. `Mo' 
  Udall Post Office Building''. <<NOTE: Dec. 18, 2006 -  [H.R. 5857]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. MORRIS K. ``MO'' UDALL POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 1501 South Cherrybell Avenue in Tucson, Arizona, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Morris K. `Mo' Udall Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Morris K. 
`Mo' Udall Post Office Building''.

    Approved December 18, 2006.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 5857:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 152 (2006):
            Sept. 25, considered and passed House.
            Dec. 6, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                             674
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,397
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      2,200
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 4,403
<PP&E>                                           1,860
<DEPRECIATION>                                     301
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   6,371
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,875
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     6,371
<SALES>                                          4,487
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                            3,630
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,630
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,334
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (631)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (631)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.07)
        







</TABLE>
#### Lorraine Cullen, Respondent, v Nassau County Civil Service Commission et al., Petitioners, and New York State Division of Human Rights et al., Respondents.

Proceeding by the Nassau County Civil Service Commission and Ronald J. Levinson, Deputy Executive Director, commenced pursuant to section 298 of the Executive Law, to review so much of an order of the State Human Rights Appeal Board, dated June 24,1980, as affirmed that portion of a determination of the State Division of Human Rights, dated June 18, 1979, which, after a hearing, directed them to pay the complainant $1,000 compensatory damages. The State division has cross-moved for an order enforcing the payment of damages. Petition granted, on the law and as a matter of discretion, without costs or disbursements, and the order of the State Human Rights Appeal Board is modified by adding thereto, immediately after the word “affirmed”, the following: “except that the portion of the determination which awarded compensatory damages is deleted.” Cross motion by the New York State Division of Human Rights dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements. Although the actions of the Nassau County Civil Service Commission were discriminatory in effect, on this record, there was no showing that the commission acted willfully. In formulating qualifications for “Open Competitive Examination No. 62-880, Investigator”, the county commission consulted with the New York State Department of Civil Service and published minimum qualifications consistent with the departments suggestions. Thus, given the county commissioners good faith effort to establish reasonable and job-related qualifications for the examination, damages were not warranted. Mollen, P. J., Mangano, Margett and Weinstein, JJ., concur.
§ 1708.105 Promise of confidentiality. ( a ) The Investigating Officer(s) may give a promise of confidentiality to any individual who provides evidence for a safety inquiry or investigation to encourage frank communication.
( b ) A promise of confidentiality must be explicit.
( c ) A promise of confidentiality must be documented in writing.
( d ) A promise of confidentiality may be given only as needed to ensure forthright cooperation of a witness and may not be given on a blanket basis to all witnesses.
( e ) A promise of confidentiality must inform the witness that it applies only to information given to the Investigating Officer(s) and not to the same information if given to others.
MISCELLANEOUS DISMISSALS

2007-1969.

#### State v. Craft.

Butler App. No. CA2006-06-145, 2007-0hio-4116. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal and claimed appeal of right. It appears from the records of the court that the appellant has not filed a memorandum in support of jurisdiction, due January 11, 2008, in compliance with the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court and therefore has failed to prosecute this cause with the requisite diligence. Upon consideration thereof,

It is ordered by the court that this cause is dismissed sua sponte.
#### § 431.291 Scope.

This subpart specifies test procedures and energy conservation standards for certain commercial refrigerated bottled or canned beverage vending machines, pursuant to part A of Title III of the Energy Policy and Conservation Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 6291-6309. The regulatory provisions of §§ 430.33 and 430.34 and subparts D and E of part 430 of this chapter are applicable to refrigerated bottled or canned beverage vending machines.

[80 FR 45792, July 31, 2015]
1

Daniels, Nia (FAA)

From: Daniels, Nia (FAA)

Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2015 8:51 AM

To: 'kquinn@pillsburylaw.com'

Cc: '333exemptions@faa.gov'; Malecha, James (FAA)

Subject: Request for Additional Information- Industrial Skyworks USA, Inc. FAA-2014-1060

April 23, 2015 

Dear Mr. Quinn: 

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA2014-1060). This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your 

petition. 

 A safety case is required for nighttime operations by Order 8900.1, Volume 16, Chapter 5, Section 3, 

Paragraph 16-5-3-7I. The required components of a safety case and safety case format may be found in 

Order 8900.1, Volume 16, Chapter 7, Section 1, Paragraph 16-7-1-3. 

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit 

any proprietary information to the FAA Headquarters or electronically via e-mail to 

333exemptions@faa.gov. If you want us to process your request any further, we must receive the information 

described above by May 7, 2015. If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without 

notifying you further. 

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-9677. 

Sincerely, 

Nia Daniels 

Program Analyst 

Nia Daniels, ARM‐108

Federal Aviation Administration

Office of Rulemaking, Airmen & Airspace Rules Division

800 Independence Avenue, SW

Washington, DC 20591

PH: (202) 267 ‐ 7626

Fax: (202) 267 ‐ 5075

nia.daniels@faa.gov
PGI 216.402-2 Technical performance

incentives.

Contractor performance incentives should relate to specific performance areas of milestones, such

as delivery or test schedules, quality controls, maintenance requirements, and reliability standards.

Parent topic: PGI 216.402 Application of predetermined, formula-type incentives.
PGI 216.104-70 Research and development.       (1) *General*. There are several categories of research and development (R&D) contracts: research, exploratory development, advanced development, engineering development, and operational systems development (see DFARS 235.001 for definitions). Each category has a primary technical or functional objective. Different parts of a project may fit several categories. The contract type must fit the work required, not just the classification of the overall program.          (2) *Research and exploratory development*.          (i) Price is not necessarily the primary factor in determining the contract type.          (ii) The nature of the work to be performed will usually result in a cost-plus award fee, cost-plus fixed fee term, cost-no-fee, or cost-sharing contract.          (iii) If the Government and the contractor can identify and agree upon the level of contractor effort required, the contracting officer may select a firm fixed-price level-of-effort contract, except see DFARS 235.006.          (iv) If the Government and the contractor agree that an incentive arrangement is desirable and capable of being evaluated after completion of the work, the contracting officer may use an incentive type contract.          (3) *Advanced development*.          (i) The nature of the work to be performed often results in a cost-plus fixed fee completion type contract.          (ii) Contracting officers may select incentive contracts if—          (A) Realistic and measurable targets are identified; and          (B) Achievement of those targets is predictable with a reasonable degree of accuracy.          (iii) Contracting officers should not use contracts with only cost incentives where—          (A) There will be a large number of major technical changes; or          (B) Actions beyond the control of the contractor may influence the contractor's achievement of cost targets.          (4) Engineering development and operational systems development.          (i) When selecting contract types, also consider—          (A) The degree to which the project is clearly defined, which in turn affects the contractor's ability to provide accurate cost estimates;          (B) The need for effort that will overlap that of earlier stages;          (C) The need for firm technical direction by the Government; and          (D) The degree of configuration control the Government will exercise.          (ii) For development efforts, particularly for major defense systems, the preferred contract type is cost reimbursement.          (iii) Contracting officers should use fixed-price type contracts when risk has been reduced to the extent that realistic pricing can occur; e.g., when a program has reached the final stages of development and technical risks are minimal, except see DFARS 235.006.    **Parent topic:** PGI 216.104 Factors in selecting contract type.
2001.603 Selection, appointment, and termination of appointment.       The Director, Division of Contracts and Property Management, is authorized by the Director, Office of Administration, to select and appoint contracting officers and to terminate their appointment as prescribed in FAR 1.603. Delegations of contracting officer authority are issued by memorandum which includes a clear statement of the delegated authority, including responsibilities and limitations in addition to the “Certificate of Appointment”, SF 1402. The Director, Division of Contracts and Property Management, may delegate micro-purchase authority in accordance with agency procedures. This delegation may be accomplished by written memorandum. (ref. FAR 1.603-3(b))    **Parent topic:** Subpart 2001.6 - Contracting Authority and Responsibilities
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Corporate Trust Services**

  MAC R1204-010  9062 Old Annapolis Road  Columbia, MD 21045  Tel: 410 884 2000  Fax: 410 715 2380 |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

Wells Fargo CommercialMortgage Securities, Inc.

375 PARK AVE FL 2

Wells Fargo Securities, LLC

NEW YORK, New York 10152-0002

 

Re:          Annual Statement of Compliance for Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Securities,Inc., Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2012-C10

 

Per the Pooling and Servicing Agreementdated as of December 1, 2012 (the "Agreement"), the undersigned, aduly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Certificate Administrator("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the yearending December 31, 2016 (the "Reporting Period"):

 

(a) A review of WellsFargo's activities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under theAgreement has been made under such officer's supervision; and

 

(b) To the best of such officer'sknowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of itsobligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

 

February 27, 2017

 

 

/s/ Brian Smith

BRIAN SMITH

Vice President

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll  go far |
|------------------------|-------------------------------------|
PGI 225.872-6 Request for audit services.       (1) Send requests for audit services in France, Germany, the Netherlands, or the United Kingdom to the administrative contracting officer at the cognizant activity listed in Section 2B of the Federal Directory of Contract Administration Services. See DFARS 225.870, PGI                 225.870-1             , and PGI                 225.870-5              for procedures to request audit services for contracts overseen by the Canadian Commercial Corporation.          (2) Complete requests for audit services in France, Germany, the Netherlands, or the United Kingdom using the forms and information sheet with form completion instructions available at http://www.dcma.mil/Contact-Us/Division_I/ (click on “DCMA Foreign Contractors Pricing Support and Assist Audit Information Sheet”).    **Parent topic:** PGI 225.872 Contracting with qualifying country sources.
Case 2:06-cv-00796-WKW-CSC Document 13 Filed 11/16/2006 Page 1 of 1
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v John Savage, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed. *(See People v Friscia,*51 NY2d 845.) (Appeal from judgment of Erie Supreme Court — attempted assault, second degree.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Simons, Hancock, Jr., Callahan and Moule, JJ.
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002



The undersigned hereby certify pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the quarterly report of United
States Basketball League, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended August 31, 2012 fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such quarterly report on
Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operation of United States Basketball
League, Inc.



Date: October 22, 2012



|/s/ Daniel T. Meisenheimer, III | 
|------------------------------- | 
|Daniel T. Meisenheimer, III     | 
|President                       | 



Date: October 22, 2012



|/s/ Richard C. Meisenheimer | 
|--------------------------- | 
|Richard C. Meisenheimer     | 
|Chief Financial Officer     |