alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-40136 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus RANDY EARNEST TODD, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. G-97-CR-1

- - - - - - - - - - December 9, 1998 Before DAVIS, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Randy Earnest Todd appeals from his conviction and resultant sentence for being a felon in possession of a firearm. He argues that the district court failed to comply with the dictates of Fed. R. Crim. P. 11, that his guilty plea was not knowingly and voluntarily entered, and that the district court clearly erred by determining that one of the firearms he possessed was stolen. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
PGI 215.303 Responsibilities.       (b)(2) The source selection plan—          (A) Shall be prepared and maintained by a person designated by the source selection authority or as prescribed by agency procedures; and          (B) Shall be coordinated with the contracting officer and senior advisory group, if any, within the source selection organization.    **Parent topic:** PGI 215.3 -SOURCE SELECTION
Case 2:06-cv-00748-MEF-WC Document 16 Filed 10/10/2006 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:06-cv-00748-MEF-WC Document 16 Filed 10/10/2006 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:06-cv-00748-MEF-WC Document 16 Filed 10/10/2006 Page 3 of 3
§ 455.1 Purpose and scope. ( a ) This part establishes programs of financial assistance pursuant to Title III of the Energy Policy and Conservation Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 6371 *et seq.*
( b ) This part authorizes grants to States or to public or non-profit schools and hospitals to assist them in conducting preliminary energy audits and energy audits, in identifying and implementing energy conservation maintenance and operating procedures, and in evaluating, acquiring, and installing energy conservation measures, including renewable resource measures, to reduce the energy use and anticipated energy costs of buildings owned by schools and hospitals.
( c ) This part also authorizes grants to States or units of local government and public care institutions to assist them in conducting preliminary energy audits and energy audits, in identifying and implementing energy conservation maintenance and operating procedures, and in evaluating energy conservation measures, including renewable resource measures, to reduce the energy use and anticipated energy costs of buildings owned by units of local government and public care institutions.
#### § 205.381 Applicability of emergency orders.

An order for emergency measures under section 215A(b) of the Federal Power Act (emergency order) may apply to the Electric Reliability Organization, a regional entity or entities, or any owner, user, or operator of critical electric infrastructure or of defense critical electric infrastructure within the United States. Emergency measures may be issued if deemed necessary in the judgment of the Secretary to protect or restore the reliability of critical electric infrastructure or of defense critical electric infrastructure during a presidentially-declared grid security emergency.
H. Res. 220

In the House of Representatives, U.S., 

October 25, 2005.

Whereas each year more than 4,500,000 Americans need a 

blood transfusion, and for over half the need is urgent 

and lifesaving; 

Whereas one out of three people need donated blood in their 

lifetime, and one out of seven hospital patients need a 

blood transfusion; 

Whereas it is the blood available on a daily basis that saves 

lives, and volunteer blood donors are required every day 

to meet patient needs and to be immediately available in 

times of disaster; 

Whereas community blood centers strive year-round to maintain a sufficient blood supply, an urgent task because 

blood components must be constantly rotated as a result 

of blood’s short 42-day shelf life; 

Whereas America’s Blood Centers was founded in 1962 and 

is North America’s largest network of community-based, 

federally licensed, not-for-profit blood centers; 

Whereas members of America’s Blood Centers serve more 

than 150,000,000 people and operate more than 600 collection sites, collecting a significant amount of the blood 

supply of the United States; 
2

•HRES 220 EH 

Whereas members of America’s Blood Centers are currently 

engaged in developing new tests and new technologies to 

further assure the safety of the Nation’s blood supply 

and are actively engaged in biomedical research in the 

area of transfusion medicine; 

Whereas America’s Blood Centers assists its members and 

other blood organizations in assuring adequate blood supplies for patients in times of disasters; 

Whereas members of America’s Blood Centers were the first 

to respond to the Oklahoma City bombing, the Columbine 

shootings, and the 9/11 World Trade Center tragedy and 

since 9/11 have supported and developed with the Departments of Homeland Security and Health and Human 

Services proposals to ensure rapid response and adequate 

blood support in the case of a national disaster or act of 

terrorism; and 

Whereas members of America’s Blood Centers support military operations around the globe: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

(1) recognizes the role of America’s Blood Centers 

and its members in—

(A) providing life saving blood to patients, including the military in times of war and the Nation 

in times of disaster; 

(B) ensuring the safety of that blood supply; 

and 

(C) promoting essential blood donor initiatives; 

(2) acknowledges the efforts made by member community blood centers and other blood organizations to 
3

•HRES 220 EH 

promote and protect the safety and adequacy of blood 

components provided to patients; and 

(3) recognizes the need to promote a stable blood 

supply and increase volunteer participation of blood donors.

Attest:

Clerk.
#### § 501.143 Comments.

Any interested person may file a written comment on or objection to a published ruling at any time with the Assistant General Counsel for Interpretations and Rulings at the address provided in § 501.11.
# SUBCHAPTER F—SPECIAL CATEGORIES OF CONTRACTING   

- PART 1234 [RESERVED] 
- PART 1235—RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CONTRACTING 
- PART 1236—CONSTRUCTION AND ARCHITECT-ENGINEER CONTRACTS 
- PART 1237—SERVICE CONTRACTING 
- PART 1239—ACQUISITION OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 
- PART 1241 [RESERVED] 

- PART 1234 [RESERVED]   
- PART 1235—RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CONTRACTING    - 1235.003   Policy.
  - 1235.011-70   Contract clause.
  - 1235.012   Patent rights.
  - 1235.070   Research misconduct.
  - 1235.070-1   Contract clause.
- PART 1236—CONSTRUCTION AND ARCHITECT-ENGINEER CONTRACTS    - Subpart 1236.5—Contract Clauses     - 1236.570   Special precautions for work at operating airports.
- PART 1237—SERVICE CONTRACTING    - Subpart 1237.1—Service Contracts—General     - 1237.110-70   Contract clauses.
  - Subpart 1237.70—Procedures for Acquiring Training Services     - 1237.7000   Policy.
    - 1237.7001   Certification of data.
    - 1237.7002   Applicability.
    - 1237.7003   Solicitation provision and contract clause.
- PART 1239—ACQUISITION OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY    - 1239.000   Scope of part.
  - 1239.002   Definitions.
  - Subpart 1239.1—General     - 1239.101   Policy.
    - 1239.101-70   Policy—software management and development.
    - 1239.101-71   Scope.
    - 1239.101-72   Definitions.
    - 1239.101-73   Policy.
    - 1239.106-70   Contract clauses.
  - Subpart 1239.2—Information and Communication Technology     - 1239.201   Scope of subpart.
    - 1239.203   Applicability.
    - 1239.203-70   Information and communication technology accessibility standards—contract clause and provision.
  - Subpart 1239.70—Information Security and Incident Response Reporting     - 1239.7000   Scope of subpart.
    - 1239.7001   Definitions.
    - 1239.7002   Policy.
    - 1239.7003   Contract clauses.
  - Subpart 1239.71—Protection of Data About Individuals     - 1239.7100   Scope of subpart.
    - 1239.7101   Definitions.
    - 1239.7102   Policy.
    - 1239.7103   Responsibilities.
    - 1239.7104   Contract clause.
  - Subpart 1239.72—Cloud Computing     - 1239.7200   Scope of subpart.
    - 1239.7201   Definitions.
    - 1239.7202   Policy.
    - 1239.7203   DOT FedRAMP specific requirements.
    - 1239.7204   Contract clauses.
  - Subpart 1239.73—Technology Modernization and Upgrades/Refreshment     - 1239.7300   Scope of subpart.
    - 1239.7301   Definitions.
    - 1239.7302   Policy.
    - 1239.7303   Contract clauses.
  - Subpart 1239.74—Records Management     - 1239.7400   Scope of subpart.
    - 1239.7401   Definition.
    - 1239.7402   Policy.
    - 1239.7403   Contract clause.
- PART 1241 [RESERVED]
Exhibit 33.2



|                                                 |  |                                                                                                            
|------------------------------------------------ |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|LOGO  3000 Leadenhall Road
 Mt. Laurel, NJ 08054 |  | Glen A. Messina President and CEO
 Tel: (856) 917-6847
Fax: (856) 917-6145 glen.messina@phh.com
www.phh.com





REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH REGULATION AB

SERVICING CRITERIA

PHH Mortgage
Corporation (the Asserting Party) is responsible for assessing compliance as of December 31, 2014 and for the period from January 1, 2014 through December 31, 2014 (the Reporting Period) with the servicing
criteria set forth in Section 229.1122(d) of the Code of Federal Regulations (the CFR), except for criteria set forth in Section 229.1122(d)(3)(i)(c), (d)(4)(xv) and (d)(1)(iii) of the CFR, which the Asserting Party has
concluded are not applicable to the servicing activities it performs with respect to the transactions covered by this report (the Applicable Servicing Criteria). The criteria set forth in Section 229.1122 (d)(2)(i), (d)(2)(ii),
(d)(4)(iv), (d)(4)(vii), (d)(4)(viii) and (d)(4)(xi) of the CFR are performed by outsource providers on behalf of the Asserting Party; however, the Asserting Party has monitored the outsourcing of these criteria and assumes responsibility for
compliance. The transactions covered by this report include all non-agency loan sale agreements executed after January 1, 2006 as well as all re-securitization transactions after January 1, 2006 for which the Asserting Party served as
servicer (the Platform).

The Asserting Party has assessed its compliance with the Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2014 and for the
Reporting Period and has concluded that the Asserting Party has complied, in all material respects, with the Applicable Servicing Criteria with respect to the Platform taken as a whole.

Deloitte & Touche, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on the assessment of compliance with the
Servicing Criteria for the Reporting Period as set forth in this assertion.



|                                      
|--------------------------------------
|PHH Mortgage Corporation              
|                                      
|Date: February 26, 2015               
|                                      
|/s/ Glen A. Messina                   
|Glen A. Messina                       
|President                             
|                                      
|/s/ Martin L. Foster                  
|Martin L. Foster                      
|Senior Vice President  Loan Servicing
#### § 15.13 Subdivision of claims.

The NRC shall consider a debtor's liability arising from a particular transaction or contract as a single claim in determining whether the claim is less than the monetary limitation for the purpose of compromising or suspending or terminating collection action. A claim may not be subdivided to avoid the monetary limitation established by 31 U.S.C. 3711(a)(2) and § 15.7.

[55 FR 32378, Aug. 9, 1990]
IV 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 244

Commemorating the 100th anniversary of the creation of the Salton Sea. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 27, 2005

Mr. FILNER (for himself and Mrs. BONO) submitted the following resolution; 

which was referred to the Committee on Resources 

RESOLUTION

Commemorating the 100th anniversary of the creation of 

the Salton Sea.

Whereas the Salton Sea was formed in 1905 when the Colorado River burst out of its man-made irrigation canal 

and flooded the dry alkaline basin of the Imperial Valley 

to create California’s largest lake and the largest inland 

body of water west of the Rockies; 

Whereas the Salton Sea was originally a fresh water lake, but 

is now a closed system with a tremendously productive 

ecosystem that is home to numerous fish and nearly 400 

species of birds, including several species that are on the 

endangered species list such as the Yuma clapper rail, 

the California brown pelican, the desert pupfish, the 

Aleutian Canada goose, the Southwest willow flycatcher 

and the bald eagle; 
2

•HRES 244 IH 

Whereas 95 percent of other wetlands in Southern California 

have been lost to development, and the Salton Sea is a 

critical stopover for migratory birds and a vital link for 

waterfowl and shore birds on the Pacific Flyway; 

Whereas although the Salton Sea is known best for its fish 

and bird populations, it is also home to 24 species of reptiles and over 20 species of mammals; 

Whereas in addition to its ecological value, the Salton Sea 

serves as the second largest producer of geothermal-generated electricity and mineral recovery in the United 

States; 

Whereas the Salton Sea receives over 200,000 visitors each 

year who partake in its many recreational areas and visit 

the Sonny Bono Salton Sea National Wildlife Refuge; 

and 

Whereas the Congress passed the Salton Sea Reclamation 

Act in 1998, directing the Secretary of the Interior, acting through the Bureau of Reclamation, to prepare a 

study on the restoration of the Salton Sea and submit it 

to the Congress by January 1, 2000: Now, therefore, be 

it

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

2 (1) celebrates the 100th anniversary of the cre3 ation of the Salton Sea; 

4 (2) recognizes the extraordinary economic, cul5 tural, recreational, scientific and environmental im6 portance of the Salton Sea; and 

7 (3) recommits itself to restoring the Salton Sea.

Æ
§ 455.111 Applicant certifications for technical assistance and energy conservation measure grants to institutions and coordinating agencies. Applications for financial assistance for technical assistance programs and energy conservation measures, including renewable resource measures, shall include certification that the applicant: ( a ) Is eligible under § 455.61 for technical assistance or § 455.71 for energy conservation measures;
( b ) Has satisfied the requirements set forth in § 455.110;
( c ) For applications for technical assistance, has implemented all energy conservation maintenance and operating procedures recommended in the energy audit pursuant to § 455.20(k), if done, and for applications for energy conservation measures, those recommended in the report obtained under a technical assistance program pursuant to § 455.62. If any such procedure has not been implemented, the application shall contain a satisfactory written justification consistent with the State plan for not implementing that procedure;
( d ) Will obtain from the technical assistance analyst, before the analyst performs any work in connection with a technical assistance program or energy conservation measure, a signed statement certifying that the technical assistance analyst has no conflicting financial interest and is otherwise qualified to perform the duties of technical assistance analyst in accordance with the standards and criteria established in the approved State Plan;
( e ) When using borrowed funds for the non-Federal share of an energy conservation project where a lien is placed by the lender on equipment funded under the grant, will obtain clauses in the financing contract: ( 1 ) Stating the percent of DOE interest in the equipment (i.e., the percent of the total cost provided by the grant); and
( 2 ) Requiring lender notification, with certified return receipt requested, to the applicable Support Office Director of the filing of a lawsuit seeking a remedy for a default; and
( f ) Will comply with all reporting requirements contained in § 455.113.
§ 501.123 Evaluation of the record. ( a ) The record in a proceeding on a petition for stay shall consist of the petition and any related documents, evidence submitted at any public proceedings and any other information in the possession of OFE and made part of the record. OFE may investigate and corroborate any statement in the petition or any other document submitted to it and may utilize in its evaluation any relevant facts obtained by its investigations. OFE may solicit or accept submissions from third persons relevant to the petition for stay or other document and any interested person will be afforded an opportunity to respond to these submissions. OFE, on its initiative, may convene a conference, if, in its discretion, it considers that the conference will advance its evaluation of the petition.
( b ) *Criteria.* ( 1 ) OFE may grant a stay incident to a proceeding on a petition for modification of a rule or order if the petitioner shows: ( i ) Irreparable injury will result if the stay is denied;
( ii ) There is a strong likelihood of success on the merits;
( iii ) The denial of a stay will result in a more immediate hardship or inequity to the petitioner than to other persons affected by the proceeding; and
( iv ) It would be desirable for reasons of public policy to grant the stay.
No. 47,884

#### State of Kansas, *Appellant,*v. Gregory K. Cotton, *Appellee.*

(543 P. 2d 936)

Opinion filed December 13, 1975.

*Curt T. Schneider,*Attorney General, *Keith Sanborn,*District Attorney, and *Robert L. Kennedy, Jr.,*Assistant District Attorney, were on the brief for the appellant.

*Bruce B. Fitts,*of Warner, Bailey, O’Hara & Fitts, of Wichita, was on the brief for the appellee.

*Per Curiam:*

This is an interlocutory appeal by the state from an order of the district court suppressing tape recorded admissions by the defendant in a vehicular homicide case (K. S. A. 21-3405) because his attorney was not notified of, and present at, the interrogation. Defendant’s attorney had consented that the defendant might be given a polygraph test at the Wichita Police Department. The defendant had left his car at the courthouse, and after the test the defendant went with the officer back to the courthouse where he was interrogated and a tape recording made. No charges had been filed at that time and the accused had not then been arrested.

The record shows that the defendant, though it was not a custodial interrogation, was adequately advised of his rights and given the warnings required by the *Miranda*decision. *(Miranda v. Arizona,*384 U. S. 436, 16 L. Ed. 2d 694, 86 S. Ct. 1602.) According to the testimony he was asked three times if he wanted to talk to his attorney and advised that he could do so. But the defendant said, according to the witness, that “he didn’t want an attorney, it wouldn’t do him any good.”

The. sole complaint is that the officer should have called defendant’s attorney and given him opportunity to be present, regardless of the expressed wishes of the defendant to the contrary; and that his failure to do so renders the tape recording inadmissible. The defendant did not testify at the admissibility hearing, and the state’s evidence stands unchallenged.

We are not concerned here with a question of ethics, if the matter has an ethical aspect, as the trial court suggested. The *458interrogation was conducted by a police sergeant. No attorney for the prosecution was present. Our only concern is whether the defendant made a voluntary waiver. The record clearly shows that the defendant expressly, knowingly and intelligently, waived his rights to remain silent and to have his attorney present. His statement was entirely voluntary and made after the prescribed warnings were given, whether they were necessary or not. We find nothing to support a claim of denial of due process or of compulsory self-incrimination. Furthermore, there is no rule which would exclude the evidence on other than constitutional grounds.

Our decision in *State v. Melton,*207 Kan. 700, 486 P. 2d 1361, disposes of any doubts arising from the absence of defendant’s counsel.

The judgment of the district court is reversed and the case remanded for a new trial.
IV 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 358 

Expressing thanks to the people of the city of Rome for welcoming several 

million people into Rome and Vatican City during the funeral observances 

of Pope John Paul II in April 2005. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 12, 2005 

Mr. FOSSELLA (for himself, Mr. PASCRELL, Mr. KING of New York, and Mr. 

MCNULTY) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on International Relations 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing thanks to the people of the city of Rome for 

welcoming several million people into Rome and Vatican 

City during the funeral observances of Pope John Paul 

II in April 2005. 

Whereas Pope John Paul II passed away on April 2, 2005; 

Whereas Pope John Paul II was widely admired among people of all backgrounds, faiths, ages, races, and nations, 

including those of the Catholic faith; 

Whereas this widespread admiration manifested itself in 

many ways, but most concretely in an influx of several 

million people into the city of Rome and Vatican City for 

the funeral observances of Pope John Paul II; 
2 

•HRES 358 IH 

Whereas for more than three weeks crowds filled the streets 

of Rome; 

Whereas incidences of crime in Rome were nonexistent or 

nearly nonexistent during this period; and 

Whereas the residents of Rome, local businessmen, officials of 

Vatican City, and officials of the government of Rome 

and the Italian Government welcomed these visitors with 

open arms: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives ex2 presses thanks to the residents of the city of Rome, local 

3 businessmen, officials of Vatican City, and officials of the 

4 government of Rome and the Italian Government for wel5 coming several million people into Rome and Vatican City 

6 during the funeral observances of Pope John Paul II in 

7 April 2005. 

Æ
Subpart 808.8 [Reserved]

Parent topic: PART 808 - REQUIRED SOURCES OF SUPPLIES AND SERVICES
exh102.htm


    Exhibit
10.2

    


    


    


    


    


    


    SUMMARY
OF ORAL AGREEMENT WITH YUAN KUN DENG

    


    


    Golden Dragon Enterprises Inc. (the
“Company”) has an oral agreement with its sole officer, director, and
shareholder, Yuan Kun Deng (“Deng”) whereby Deng will advance funds as need
until the public offering is completed or fails.  The agreement
between the Company and Deng is that no interest will be charged on the amounts
advanced and the Company only has to repay the amount when it has sufficient
funds to do so.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

 EASTERN DIVISION

 _______________________________

GREGORY MONTAE FERGERSON, * 

#231 286

Petitioner, *

v. * 3:06-CV-777-MHT

WARDEN KENNETH JONES, et al., *

 

Respondents. *

 _______________________________

ORDER ON MOTION

Pending before the court is Petitioner’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis.

Upon consideration of the motion and for good cause, it is 

ORDERED that the motion (Doc. No. 2) be and is hereby GRANTED.

Done, this 6th day of September 2006.

/s/ Delores R. Boyd

DELORES R. BOYD

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

Case 3:06-cv-00777-MHT-TFM Document 3 Filed 09/06/2006 Page 1 of 1