alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 334 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 334

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                         June 22, 2005.
    Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker 
may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XVIII, declare the House resolved into the 
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of the 
bill (H.R. 2985) making appropriations for the Legislative Branch for the fiscal 
year ending September 30, 2006, and for other purposes. The first reading of the 
bill shall be dispensed with. All points of order against consideration of the 
bill are waived. General debate shall be confined to the bill and shall not 
exceed one hour equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking 
minority member of the Committee on Appropriations. After general debate the 
bill shall be considered for amendment under the five-minute rule. The bill 
shall be considered as read. All points of order against provisions in the bill 
for failure to comply with clause 2 of rule XXI are waived. Notwithstanding 
clause 11 of rule XVIII, no amendment to the bill shall be in order except those 
printed in the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution. 
Each such amendment may be offered only in the order printed in the report, may 
be offered only by a Member designated in the report, shall be considered as 
read, shall be debatable for the time specified in the report equally divided 
and controlled by the proponent and an opponent, shall not be subject to 
amendment, and shall not be subject to a demand for division of the question in 
the House or in the Committee of the Whole. All points of order against such 
amendments are waived. At the conclusion of consideration of the bill for 
amendment the Committee shall rise and report the bill to the House with such 
amendments as may have been adopted. The previous question shall be considered 
as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to final passage without 
intervening motion except one motion to recommit with or without instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
#### In re GRADE CROSSING COM’RS OF CITY OF BUFFALO.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

January 29, 1915.)

In the matter of the application of the Grade Crossing Commissioners of the City of Buffalo for the appointment of commissioners of appraisal, etc., in the matter of lands claimed to be owned by the Barber Asphalt Paving Company et al. (Proceeding No. 97).

No opinion. Motion for leave to appeal (from 151 N. Y. Supp. 146) to Court of Appeals granted, and questions for review certified.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 7 (Tuesday, January 12, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 1684]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-317]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Art Advisory Panel--Notice of Closed Meeting

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service, Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of Closed Meeting of Art Advisory Panel.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Closed meeting of the Art Advisory Panel will be held in 
Washington, DC.

DATES: The meeting will be held February 10, 2010.

ADDRESSES: The closed meeting of the Art Advisory Panel will be held on 
February 10, 2010, in Room 4112 beginning at 9:30 a.m., Franklin Court 
Building, 1099 14th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20005.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joseph E. Bothwell, C:AP:P&V:ART, 1099 
14th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20005. Telephone (202) 435-5611 (not a 
toll free number).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Notice is hereby given pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App., that a closed meeting of the Art 
Advisory Panel will be held on February 10, 2010, in Room 4112 
beginning at 9:30 a.m., Franklin Court Building, 1099 14th Street, NW., 
Washington, DC 20005.
    The agenda will consist of the review and evaluation of the 
acceptability of fair market value appraisals of works of art involved 
in Federal income, estate, or gift tax returns. This will involve the 
discussion of material in individual tax returns made confidential by 
the provisions of 26 U.S.C. 6103.
    A determination as required by section 10(d) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act has been made that this meeting is concerned 
with matters listed in section 552b(c)(3), (4), (6), and (7), and that 
the meeting will not be open to the public.

Diane S. Ryan,
Chief, Appeals.
[FR Doc. 2010-317 Filed 1-11-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
H. Res. 440

In the House of Representatives, U.S., 

September 15, 2005.

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule 

XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the 

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of 

the bill (H.R. 889) to authorize appropriations for the Coast 

Guard for fiscal year 2006, to make technical corrections to 

various laws administered by the Coast Guard, and for other 

purposes. The first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. 

All points of order against consideration of the bill are 

waived. General debate shall be confined to the bill and shall 

not exceed one hour equally divided and controlled by the 

chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on 

Transportation and Infrastructure. After general debate the 

bill shall be considered for amendment under the five-minute 

rule. It shall be in order to consider as an original bill for 

the purpose of amendment under the five-minute rule the 

amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure now printed 
2

•HRES 440 EH 

in the bill. The committee amendment in the nature of a substitute shall be considered by title rather than by section. 

Each title shall be considered as read. All points of order 

against the committee amendment in the nature of a substitute are waived. Notwithstanding clause 11 of rule XVIII, 

no amendment to the committee amendment in the nature of 

a substitute shall be in order except those printed in the portion of the Congressional Record designated for that purpose 

in clause 8 of rule XVIII and except pro forma amendments 

for the purpose of debate. Each amendment so printed may 

be offered only by the Member who caused it to be printed 

or his designee and shall be considered as read. At the conclusion of consideration of the bill for amendment the Committee shall rise and report the bill to the House with such 

amendments as may have been adopted. Any Member may 

demand a separate vote in the House on any amendment 

adopted in the Committee of the Whole to the bill or to the 

committee amendment in the nature of a substitute. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and 

amendments thereto to final passage without intervening motion except one motion to recommit with or without instructions. 

SEC. 2. It shall be in order at any time on the legislative 

day of Thursday, September 15, 2005, for the Speaker to en-
3

•HRES 440 EH 

tertain a motion that the House suspend the rules relating 

to the bill H.R. 3768. 

Attest:

Clerk.
PGI 225.7002-2 Exceptions.

(b) Domestic nonavailability determinations.

(3) Defense agencies other than the Defense Logistics Agency.

(A) A defense agency requesting a domestic nonavailability determination must submit the request,

including the proposed determination, to—

Principal Director, Defense Pricing and Contracting

ATTN: OUSD(A&S) DPC/CP

3060 Defense Pentagon

Washington, DC 20301-3060.

(B) The Principal Director, Defense Pricing and Contracting, will forward the request to the Under

Secretary of Defense (Acquisition and Sustainment) (USD(A&S)) as appropriate.

Parent topic: PGI 225.7002 Restrictions on food, clothing, fabrics, and hand or measuring tools.
#### John B. Finley, *Appellant,*v. State of Kansas, *Appellee.*

No. 47,828

Opinion filed November 8, 1975.

*Frank R. Cobb,*of Hill, Mason & Gilchrist, of Wichita, was on the brief for appellant.

*Stephen M. Joseph,*assistant district attorney, and *Curt T. Schneider,*attorney general, were on the brief for the appellee.

*Per Curiam:*

Affirmed.

Miller, J., not participating.
PGI 209.570-1 Definitions.

The phrase “substantial portion of the work,” as used in the definition of “lead system integrator

with system responsibility” in the clause at DFARS 252.209-7007, may relate to the dollar value of

the effort or to the criticality of the effort to be performed.

Parent topic: PGI 209.570 Limitations on contractors acting as lead system integrators.
Exhibit 32

Certification

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63
of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of FNB United Corp., a North Carolina corporation (the Corporation), does hereby certify that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 (the Form 10-Q) of the
Corporation fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all materials respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Corporation.



|                      |  |  |  |  |  |                                          
|--------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | -----------------------------------------
|                      |  |  |  | 
|                      |  |  | 
|Date:    May 17, 2010 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ R. LARRY CAMPBELL                    
|                      |  |  |  |  |  | R. Larry Campbell
Chief Executive Officer
|                      |  |  |  |  |  |                                          
|                      |  |  |  | 
|                      |  |  | 
|Date:    May 17, 2010 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ MARK A. SEVERSON                     
|                      |  |  |  |  |  | Mark A. Severson
Chief Financial Officer 
|                      |  |  |  |  |  |                                          

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-6241

ANTONIO BURTS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

SULLIVAN’S BODY SHOP,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District

Judge. (6:06-cv-02500-HMH)

Submitted: May 30, 2008 Decided: June 10, 2008

Before KING and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit

Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Antonio Burts, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
*

To the extent that Burts’ notice of appeal could be construed

as pertaining to the district court’s September 10, 2007 order

finding several of Burts’ post-judgment motions to be moot, we note

that the notice of appeal also is untimely as to that order.

- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Antonio Burts seeks to file an appeal in his action

against Sullivan’s Body Shop. We dismiss the appeal for lack of

jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed.

Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of the

district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R.

App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the appeal

period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the appeal period

under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). This appeal period is “mandatory

and jurisdictional.” Browder v. Dir., Dep’t of Corr., 434 U.S.

257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson, 361 U.S. 220,

229 (1960)). 

The district court’s final order was entered on the

docket on October 23, 2006. The notice of appeal was filed more

than a year later. Because Burts failed to file a timely notice of

appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period,

we dismiss the appeal.* We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED
Editorial Note on Part 35
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 35 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

§ 35.27 Supervision. ( a ) A licensee that permits the receipt, possession, use, or transfer of byproduct material by an individual under the supervision of an authorized user, as allowed by § 35.11(b)(1), shall— ( 1 ) In addition to the requirements in § 19.12 of this chapter, instruct the supervised individual in the licensee's written radiation protection procedures, written directive procedures, regulations of this chapter, and license conditions with respect to the use of byproduct material; and
( 2 ) Require the supervised individual to follow the instructions of the supervising authorized user for medical uses of byproduct material, written radiation protection procedures established by the licensee, written directive procedures, regulations of this chapter, and license conditions with respect to the medical use of byproduct material.
( b ) A licensee that permits the preparation of byproduct material for medical use by an individual under the supervision of an authorized nuclear pharmacist or physician who is an authorized user, as allowed by § 35.11(b)(2), shall— ( 1 ) In addition to the requirements in § 19.12 of this chapter, instruct the supervised individual in the preparation of byproduct material for medical use, as appropriate to that individual's involvement with byproduct material; and
( 2 ) Require the supervised individual to follow the instructions of the supervising authorized user or authorized nuclear pharmacist regarding the preparation of byproduct material for medical use, written radiation protection procedures established by the licensee, the regulations of this chapter, and license conditions.
( c ) A licensee that permits supervised activities under paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section is responsible for the acts and omissions of the supervised individual.
1222.810-70 Contract clause.

The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 1252.222–72, Contractor Cooperation in Equal

Employment Opportunity and Anti-Harassment Investigations, in solicitations, contracts, and orders

that include the clause at FAR 52.222–26, Equal Opportunity.

Parent topic: Subpart 1222.8—Equal Employment Opportunity
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 275 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 275

 Recognizing and honoring the work of Southwest Washington Independent 
                    Forward Thrust and its members.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 12, 2005

Mr. Baird submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Recognizing and honoring the work of Southwest Washington Independent 
                    Forward Thrust and its members.

Whereas nonprofit organizations enrich the fabric of our communities through 
        their positive impacts on culture, the arts, social services, civic 
        matters, and educational endeavors;
Whereas Southwest Washington Independent Forward Thrust was founded in 1975 to 
        improve the lives of the people in southwestern Washington State;
Whereas SWIFT grants provide funds for public art, playgrounds, peer mediation 
        programs for the prevention of school violence, community kitchens for 
        feeding the homeless, and dental and health care clinics for uninsured 
        families; and
Whereas such an organization is due recognition for its service to the Nation: 
        Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved,  That the House of Representatives--
            (1) congratulates Southwest Washington Independent Forward 
        Thrust on the occasion of the 30th anniversary of its founding; 
        and
            (2) recognizes and honors the work of Southwest Washington 
        Independent Forward Thrust and its members for their continuing 
        selfless efforts to improve the lives of countless persons and 
        families.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 10.23


 


Executive
Officer Compensation


 


The annual base salaries
for our executive officers as of January 1, 2010 are as follows:


 


	
  Name

  	
   

  	
  Title

  	
   

  	
  Annual Base

  Salary

  	
   

  
	
  George A. Lopez, M.D.

  	
   

  	
  Chairman
  of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  670,000

  	
   

  
	
  Alison D. Burcar

  	
   

  	
  Vice
  President of Product Development

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  195,000

  	
   

  
	
  Richard A. Costello

  	
   

  	
  Vice
  President of Sales and Marketing

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  336,000

  	
   

  
	
  Scott E. Lamb

  	
   

  	
  Chief
  Financial Officer

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  341,000

  	
   

  
	
  Steven C. Riggs

  	
   

  	
  Vice
  President of Operations

  	
   

  	
  $

  	
  330,000

  	
   

  



 


2009
Discretionary Bonuses:


 


In
July 2009, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors approved
payment of discretionary bonuses to the above named officers for the first half
of 2009, and in January 2010, the Compensation Committee approved
discretionary bonuses to each of the above named officers for the second half
of 2009.  The amount of the bonuses for
the first half of 2009 were previously reported in the Current Report on Form 8-K
filed with the SEC on July 23, 2009, and the amount of the bonuses for the
second half of 2009 were previously reported in the Current Report on Form 8-K
filed with the SEC on February 4, 2010, each of which reports are
incorporated herein by reference.
#### Gordon R. Windham et al., Appellants, v. State of New York, Respondent.

(Claim No. 47138.)

Reynolds, J. P.

Appeal from so much of a judgment of the Court of Claims as denied appellants consequential damages for loss of access as a result of the appropriation of a portion of appellants’ property located in the Town of Hammond, St. Lawrence County, for highway purposes. The trial court found that while appellants lost legal access to their property for the 15-day period between September 22, 1964 and October 7,1964 no award for consequential damages for loss of access was indicated since the period of loss was due solely to the State’s filing the appropriation map which took appellants’ property on September 22 and not filing the appropriation map on another portion of the same project which restored access until October 7. We concur in the trial court’s determination. *Wolfe*V. *State of New York*(22 N Y 2d 292) and other similar eases cited by appellants are not applicable here. The State in the instant ease did not as in *Wolfe*attempt to mitigate the effect of the original appropriation by action taken subsequent to the appropriation. Rather it is abundantly clear that the original plans provided appellants access and that the temporary loss of legal access was due solely to a delay in map filing. Nor is *St. Patrick Church*v. *State of New York*(30 A D 2d 473) apposite here. We agree with the trial court that to hold strictly in the face of the undeniable facts presented here that appellants should be compensated on the basis that their property was landlocked would not only be “ sanctioning a windfall award ”, but would be casting an onerous and unnecessary burden on the State to file appropriation maps in connection with a highway construction project with meticulous attention to every temporary legal situation which might develop. We find no merit in appellants’ additional eontensions and, accordingly, the judgment should be affirmed. Judgment affirmed, with costs. Reynolds, J. P., Staley, Jr., Greenblott, Cooke and Sweeney, JJ., concur in memorandum by Reynolds, J. P.
Promissory Note dated January 9, 2004



 Exhibit 10(x) 
 PROMISSORY NOTE 
  

			
	$10,000,000	 	January 9, 2004
		 	Santa Ana, California

 For
value received, The First American Corporation, a California corporation (“Maker”), promises to pay to the order of First American Home Buyers Protection Corporation, a California corporation (“Payee”), at 7833 Haskell Avenue,
Van Nuys, California 91406, the principal sum of Ten Million and no Hundredths Dollars ($10,000,000.00), and to pay interest on the balance of principal remaining from time-to-time outstanding and unpaid from January 9, 2004, until paid, at the
rate of four and one quarter percent (4.25%) per annum. Principal and interest shall be paid in lawful money of the United States of America and in immediately available funds. 
 Said principal and interest shall be due and payable in equal quarterly installments in the amount of $226,253.00 (Two
Hundred Twenty-Six Thousand Two Hundred Fifty-Three and no Hundredths Dollars) commencing on the 9th day of April 2004, with quarterly payments continuing thereafter, until January 9, 2019, when the entire unpaid balance of principal, together with all accrued interest thereon remaining unpaid,
shall be due and payable in full. 
 Each payment made on this note shall be applied first to accrued interest, and the balance
thereof shall be applied to installments of principal then due or to become due hereunder in the order of their maturity. This note may be prepaid at any time or times in whole or in part, without notice or penalty. Prepayments of principal shall be
applied in the order of maturity. Principal that is prepaid shall cease to bear interest from the date of prepayment. 
 Should
interest not be so paid, it shall thereafter bear like interest as the principal, but such unpaid interest so compounded shall not exceed an amount equal to simple interest on the unpaid principal at the maximum rate permitted by law. Should default
be made in the payment of any installment of interest or principal when due, all unpaid principal and accrued interest shall become








 
immediately due and payable at the option of the holder of this note. Should suit be commenced or an attorney be employed to enforce the payment of this note, Maker agrees to pay such additional
sum as the court may adjudge reasonable as attorneys’ fees in said suit. 
 This note is made under, and shall be construed
and enforced in accordance with, the laws of the State of California. 
  

			
	THE FIRST AMERICAN CORPORATION
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Parker S. Kennedy

		 	 Parker S. Kennedy, President

		
	By:	 	 /s/ Mark R Arnesen

		 	 Mark R Arnesen, Secretary