alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AS OF MARCH 31, 1998 AND FROM THE STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE QUARTER
ENDED MARCH 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                       1,091,883
<SECURITIES>                                 1,265,537
<RECEIVABLES>                                  145,687
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                      38,317,081
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0<F2>
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              43,086,141
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  15,535,334
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                43,086,141
<SALES>                                      2,386,677
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,421,184
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,728,764
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             492,197
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                200,223
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            200,223
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   200,223
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>THE PARTNERSHIP HAS AN UNCLASSIFIED BALANCE SHEET; THEREFORE, THE VALUE IS
$0.
<F2>THIS INFORMATION IS NOT DISCLOSED IN THE PARTNERSHIP'S FORM 10-Q FILING.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 5 A1 13 2

. K E V I N HARRI S v . GEORGI A D EPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES, EX. REL, KASAI DANE HARRI S.

Th e Geo rg i a Dep art m en t o f Hu m an Serv i ces b ro u g h t an act i o n ag ai n s t Kev in Harri s , s eek in g t o co ll ect p as t -d u e ch il d su p po rt

. T h e s u p e ri o r co u rt en t ered a

co n tem p t o rd er o n Sep tem

b er 1 6 , 2 0 1 4 , an d Harri s ap p eal ed . W e l ack ju ri s d i ct i o n

.

Becau s e t h i s cas e in vo l v e s t h e c o l l ect i o n o f ch i l d s u pp o rt , i t i s a d o m es t i c rel at i o n s m at t er wi t h i n t h e m ean i n g o f OCGA § 5 -6 -3 5 (a) (2 ). See Co ll in s v. Da vi s , 3 1 8 Ga. Ap p

. 26 5 , 2 6 6 (1 ) ( 7 3 3 SE2 d 7 9 8 ) (2 0 1 2 ); Bo o ker v. Ga

. D ep t

. o f Hu ma n Res o u r ces , 3 1 7 G a. Ap p

. 4 2 6 (7 3 1 SE2 d 11 0 ) (2 0 1 2 ). Ap p eal s i n su ch m at t ers m u s t b e t ak en b y ap pl i cat i o n fo r di s cret i on ary ap p eal

. See Bo o ker
, s u p ra. Harri s’ s fai l u re
t o fo ll o w t h e ap p ro p ri at e ap p el l at e p ro ced u re d ep ri ves u s o f j u ri s d i ct i o n t o co n s i d er h i s ap p eal , wh i ch i s t h erefo re DISM ISSED. Id

.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia C le r k ’ s O f f i c e , A t la n t a ,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti fy t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d th e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 03/31/2015 March 31, 2015
Case 2:06-cv-00771-ID-SRW     Document 12      Filed 10/02/2006     Page 1 of 9

Case 2:06-cv-00771-ID-SRW     Document 12      Filed 10/02/2006     Page 2 of 9

Case 2:06-cv-00771-ID-SRW     Document 12      Filed 10/02/2006     Page 3 of 9

Case 2:06-cv-00771-ID-SRW     Document 12      Filed 10/02/2006     Page 4 of 9

Case 2:06-cv-00771-ID-SRW     Document 12      Filed 10/02/2006     Page 5 of 9

Case 2:06-cv-00771-ID-SRW     Document 12      Filed 10/02/2006     Page 6 of 9

Case 2:06-cv-00771-ID-SRW     Document 12      Filed 10/02/2006     Page 7 of 9

Case 2:06-cv-00771-ID-SRW     Document 12      Filed 10/02/2006     Page 8 of 9

Case 2:06-cv-00771-ID-SRW     Document 12      Filed 10/02/2006     Page 9 of 9
§ 1042.445 Marital or parental status. ( a ) *Status generally.* A recipient shall not apply any rule concerning a student's actual or potential parental, family, or marital status that treats students differently on the basis of sex.
( b ) *Pregnancy and related conditions.* ( 1 ) A recipient shall not discriminate against any student, or exclude any student from its education program or activity, including any class or extracurricular activity, on the basis of such student's pregnancy, childbirth, false pregnancy, termination of pregnancy, or recovery therefrom, unless the student requests voluntarily to participate in a separate portion of the program or activity of the recipient.
( 2 ) A recipient may require such a student to obtain the certification of a physician that the student is physically and emotionally able to continue participation as long as such a certification is required of all students for other physical or emotional conditions requiring the attention of a physician.
( 3 ) A recipient that operates a portion of its education program or activity separately for pregnant students, admittance to which is completely voluntary on the part of the student as provided in paragraph (b)(1) of this section, shall ensure that the separate portion is comparable to that offered to non-pregnant students.
( 4 ) Subject to § 1042.235(d), a recipient shall treat pregnancy, childbirth, false pregnancy, termination of pregnancy and recovery therefrom in the same manner and under the same policies as any other temporary disability with respect to any medical or hospital benefit, service, plan, or policy that such recipient administers, operates, offers, or participates in with respect to students admitted to the recipient's educational program or activity.
( 5 ) In the case of a recipient that does not maintain a leave policy for its students, or in the case of a student who does not otherwise qualify for leave under such a policy, a recipient shall treat pregnancy, childbirth, false pregnancy, termination of pregnancy, and recovery therefrom as a justification for a leave of absence for as long a period of time as is deemed medically necessary by the student's physician, at the conclusion of which the student shall be reinstated to the status that she held when the leave began.
Editorial Note on Part 26
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 26 appear at 87 FR 71455, Nov. 22, 2022.

§ 26.825 Criminal penalties. ( a ) Section 223 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, provides for criminal sanctions for willful violation of, attempted violation of, or conspiracy to violate, any regulation issued under sections 161b, 161i, or 161o of the Act. For the purposes of section 223, all of the regulations in Part 26 are issued under one or more of sections 161b, 161i, or 161o, except for the sections listed in paragraph (b) of this section.
( b ) The regulations in Part 26 that are not issued under sections 161b, 161i, or 161o for the purposes of section 223 are as follows: §§ 26.1, 26.3, 26.5, 26.7, 26.8, 26.9, 26.11, 26.51, 26.81, 26.121, 26.151, 26.181, 26.201, 26.823, and 26.825.
<PAGE>

Exhibit 3(j)

                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                       OF
                          CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                          ENCORE COMPUTER CORPORATION

       ENCORE COMPUTER CORPORATION (the "Corporation"), organized and existing
under, and by virtue of, the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware,
DOES HEREBY CERTIFY:

       FIRST:  That Article FOURTH of the Corporation's Certificate of
Incorporation be, and hereby is, amended to read in its entirety as follows:

       FOURTH: The total number of shares of stock which the Corporation shall
               have the authority to issue is 210,000,000 shares of which
               200,000,000 shares shall be Common Stock, $.01 par value, and
               10,000,000 shares shall be Preferred Stock, $.01 par value. The
               Preferred Stock may be divided into, and may be issued from time
               to time in, one or more series. The Board of Directors is
               authorized from time to time to establish and designate one or
               more series of Preferred Stock, to fix and determine the
               variations in the relative rights and preferences as between the
               different series, and to fix and alter the number of shares
               comprising any such series and the designation thereof.

       SECOND: That the amendment above was duly adopted in accordance with the
provisions of Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of
Delaware.

       IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused this Certificate to be
signed by its Chairman and attested by its Secretary this 8/th/ day of August,
1995.

                                              ENCORE COMPUTER CORPORATION

                                              BY:  /s/ Kenneth G. Fisher
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 Kenneth G. Fisher, Chairman


ATTEST:

By: Kenneth S. Silverstein
    -----------------------
    Kenneth S. Silverstein                               [STAMP]
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-1164

FIKRE GETACHEW, Petitioner,
versus ALBERTO R. GONZALES, Attorney General, Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. (A79-497-592) Submitted: July 27, 2005 Decided: August 12, 2005 Before WILKINSON, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Thomas Hailu, Arlington, Virginia, for Petitioner. Kenneth L. Wainstein, United States Attorney, Madelyn E. Johnson, Heather R. Phillips, Assistant United States Attorneys, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Fikre Getachew, a native and citizen of Ethiopia, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) affirming, without opinion, the immigration judge’s denial of her application for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture. Because the Board affirmed under its streamlined process, see8 C.F.R. § 1003.1(e)(4) (2005), the immigration judge’s decision is the final agency determination. Camara v. Ashcroft , 378 F.3d 361, 366 (4th Cir. 2004). Getachew challenges the immigration judge’s finding that she failed to meet her burden of proof to qualify for asylum. We will reverse this decision only if the evidence “was so compelling that no reasonable fact finder could fail to find the requisite fear of persecution.” Rusu v. INS , 296 F.3d 316, 325 n.14 (4th Cir. 2002) (quotation marks and citations omitted). We have reviewed the administrative record and the immigration judge’s decision and find that substantial evidence supports the conclusionthat Getachew failed to establish past persecution or the wellfounded fear of future persecution necessary to establish eligibility for asylum. See 8 C.F.R. § 1208.13(a) (2005) (stating that the burden of proof is on the alien to establish eligibility for asylum); INS v. Elias-Zacarias , 502 U.S. 478, 483 (1992) (same).- 3 - We decline to address Getachew’s challenge to the immigration judge’s credibility determination, as she failed to raise the claim before the Board to satisfy the exhaustion requirement of 8 U.S.C. § 1252(d)(1) (2000). SeeAsika v. Ashcroft , 362 F.3d 264, 267 n.3 (4th Cir. 2004), cert. denied , 125 S. Ct. 861 (2005). Getachew does not challenge the ruling of the immigration judge, as affirmed by the Board, on her applications for withholding of removal or protection under the Convention Against Torture. Therefore, these claims are abandoned. See Edwards v. City of Goldsboro , 178 F.3d 231, 241 n.6 (4th Cir. 1999). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED
Case 2:06-cv-00770-MHT-DRB Document 2 Filed 08/28/2006 Page 1 of 4
Case 2:06-cv-00770-MHT-DRB Document 2 Filed 08/28/2006 Page 2 of 4
Case 2:06-cv-00770-MHT-DRB Document 2 Filed 08/28/2006 Page 3 of 4
Case 2:06-cv-00770-MHT-DRB Document 2 Filed 08/28/2006 Page 4 of 4
#### In the Matter of Herbert J. Miller, Appellant, v. James M. Power et al., Constituting the Board of Elections of the City of New York, and Franklin Miller et al., Respondents.

In a proceeding to invalidate petitions designating respondent Miller as a candidate in the Democratic Party Primary Election to be held on June 17, 1969 for nomination for the public office of Judge of the .Civil Court of the City of New York, County of Queens, and for injunctive relief, the appeal is from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered June 6, 1969, which *inter alia*dismissed the proceeding. Order affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Appellant is granted leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals. Questions of law have arisen which ought to be reviewed. Beldock, P. J., Babin, Hopkins, Benjamin and Martuseello, JJ., concur.
Subpart 2424.1 - Protection of Individual

Privacy

Parent topic: PART 2424 - PROTECTION OF PRIVACY AND FREEDOM OF INFORMATION

2424.103 Procedures.

(b)(2) See 24 CFR part 16 for the HUD regulations which implement the Privacy Act.
Subpart 2829.3 - State and Local Taxes    **Parent topic:** PART 2829 - TAXES2829.302 Application of State and local taxes to the Government.       Generally, purchases and leases made by the Federal Government are immune from State and local taxation.2829.303 Application of State and local taxes to Government contractors and subcontractors.       (a) It is DOJ policy that DOJ contracts shall not contain clauses expressly designating prime contractors as agents of the Government for the purpose of avoiding State and local taxes.          (b) A DOJ contracting activity may request to the CAO, through the HCA, that a contractor be considered an agent of the Government for the purpose of claiming immunity from State and local sales and use taxes. The CAO will review such requests to ensure compliance with DOJ policy and applicable law. Each case forwarded will be reviewed by the HCA or designee for approval before referral to the CAO.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR

THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

FARMERS TELECOMMUNICATIONS )

COOPERATIVE, INC., )

 )

Plaintiff, )

 )

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:06CV790-WC

 )

VERIZON BUSINESS NETWORK )

SERVICES INC., et al., )

 )

Defendants. )

ORDER ON MOTION

On April 25, 2007, Plaintiff Farmers Telecommunications Cooperative, Inc. filed a

Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint (Doc. #39). Upon consideration of the

motion, and for good cause, it is 

ORDERED that the motion (Doc. #39) is GRANTED. Accordingly, on or before

May 10, 2007, Plaintiff shall file its amended Complaint.

DONE this 26th day of April, 2007. 

/s/ Wallace Capel, Jr.

WALLACE CAPEL, Jr.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00790-WC Document 41 Filed 04/26/2007 Page 1 of 1
###### Editorial Note on Part 4

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 4 appear at 77 FR 39904, July 6, 2012.

#### §§ 4.541-4.548 [Reserved]
3009.570-4 Solicitation provision and contract clause.       (a) Use the provision at (HSAR) 48 CFR 3052.209–74, Limitations on Contractors Acting as Lead System Integrators, in solicitations for the acquisition of a major system when the acquisition strategy envisions the use of a lead system integrator.          (b) Use the clause at (HSAR) 48 CFR 3052.209–75, Prohibited Financial Interests for Lead System Integrators—          (1) In solicitations that include the provision at (HSAR) 48 CFR 3052.209–74; and          (2) In contracts when the contractor will fill the role of a lead system integrator for the acquisition of a major system.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 3009.5—Organizational and Consultant Conflicts of Interest
Subpart 906.1 - Full and Open Competition    **Parent topic:** PART 906 - COMPETITION REQUIREMENTS906.102 Use of competitive procedures.       (d) *Other competitive procedures.*          (1)  			Professional architect-engineer services shall be negotiated in accordance with subpart 936.6 and 48 CFR subpart 36.6.          (4) Program research and development announcements shall follow the competitive selection procedures for the award of research proposals in accordance with subpart 917.73 and 48 CFR part 35.          (5) Program opportunity notices for commercial demonstrations shall follow the competitive selection procedures for award of these proposals in accordance with subpart 917.72.
#### Ricks *v.*Ricks.

October 14, 1913.

Temporary alimony. Before Judge Rawlings. Emanuel superior court. April 26, 1913.

*L. B. Lightfoot*and *Larsen & Larsen,*for plaintiff in error.

Atkinson, J.

1. The demurrer to the petition, which complained only that it was not properly paragraphed, is not borne out by the record.

2. There was no evidence to support the traverse of the sheriff’s return of service on the defendant.

3. Though conflicting, there was evidence to support the finding of the judge, and to authorize the judgment granting temporary alimony.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
#### § 431.3 Error Correction procedure for energy conservation standards rules.

Requests for error corrections pertaining to an energy conservation standard rule for commercial or industrial equipment shall follow those procedures and provisions detailed in 10 CFR 430.5 of this chapter.

[81 FR 57758, Aug. 24, 2016]
Case 2:06-mc-03334-MHT Document 10 Filed 10/04/2006 Page 1 of 9
Case 2:06-mc-03334-MHT Document 10 Filed 10/04/2006 Page 2 of 9
Case 2:06-mc-03334-MHT Document 10 Filed 10/04/2006 Page 3 of 9
Case 2:06-mc-03334-MHT Document 10 Filed 10/04/2006 Page 4 of 9
Case 2:06-mc-03334-MHT Document 10 Filed 10/04/2006 Page 5 of 9
Case 2:06-mc-03334-MHT Document 10 Filed 10/04/2006 Page 6 of 9
Case 2:06-mc-03334-MHT Document 10 Filed 10/04/2006 Page 7 of 9
Case 2:06-mc-03334-MHT Document 10 Filed 10/04/2006 Page 8 of 9
Case 2:06-mc-03334-MHT Document 10 Filed 10/04/2006 Page 9 of 9
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1087 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1087

  Designating Room H-139 of the Capitol as the ``Henry J. Hyde Room''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 15, 2006

   Mr. Pence (for himself, Mr. Lantos, Ms. Berkley, Mr. Berman, Mr. 
Boozman, Mr. Burton of Indiana, Mr. Chabot, Mr. Crowley, Mr. Delahunt, 
 Mr. Faleomavaega, Mr. Flake, Mr. Fortenberry, Mr. Gallegly, Mr. Green 
 of Wisconsin, Ms. Harris, Mr. Issa, Mr. King of New York, Mr. Leach, 
Mr. Mack, Mr. McCaul of Texas, Ms. McCollum of Minnesota, Mr. McCotter, 
  Mr. Poe, Mr. Rohrabacher, Ms. Ros-Lehtinen, Mr. Royce, Mr. Smith of 
  Washington, Mr. Smith of New Jersey, Mr. Tancredo, Ms. Watson, Mr. 
   Wilson of South Carolina, Mr. Evans, Mr. Kirk, Mr. Lipinski, Mr. 
Manzullo, Mr. Shays, and Ms. Wasserman Schultz) submitted the following 
 resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and 
                             Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

  Designating Room H-139 of the Capitol as the ``Henry J. Hyde Room''.

    Resolved, That--
            (1) Room H-139 of the Capitol shall be known and designated 
        as the ``Henry J. Hyde Room''; and
            (2) this resolution shall take effect on the day following 
        the date on which Henry J. Hyde is no longer serving as a 
        Member of the House of Representatives.
                                 <all>
```
H. Res. 32

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

January 6, 2005.

Resolved, That the following Members be, and are hereby, elected to the following standing committees of the House

of Representatives:

COMMITTEE ON AGRICULTURE: Mr. Goodlatte, Chairman.

COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS: Mr. Jerry Lewis of

California, Chairman, Mr. C.W. Bill Young of Florida, Mr.

Regula, Mr. Rogers of Kentucky, Mr. Wolf, Mr. Kolbe, Mr.

Walsh, Mr. Taylor of North Carolina, Mr. Hobson, Mr.

Istook, Mr. Bonilla, Mr. Knollenberg, Mr. Kingston, Mr.

Frelinghuysen, Mr. Wicker, Mr. Cunningham, Mr. Tiahrt,

Mr. Wamp, Mr. Latham, Mrs. Northup, Mr. Aderholt, Mrs.

Emerson, Ms. Granger, Mr. Peterson of Pennsylvania, Mr.

Goode, Mr. Doolittle, Mr. LaHood, Mr. Sweeney, Mr. Sherwood, Mr. Weldon of Florida, Mr. Simpson, Mr. Culberson,

Mr. Kirk, Mr. Crenshaw, Mr. Rehberg, Mr. Carter, and Mr.

Alexander.
2

•HRES 32 EH

COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES: Mr. Hunter, Chairman.

COMMITTEE ON THE BUDGET: Mr. Nussle, Chairman.

COMMITTEE ON EDUCATION AND THE WORKFORCE: Mr.

Boehner, Chairman.

COMMITTEE ON ENERGY AND COMMERCE: Mr. Barton,

Chairman, Mr. Hall, Mr. Bilirakis, Mr. Upton, Mr. Stearns,

Mr. Gillmor, Mr. Deal, Mr. Whitfield, Mrs. Cubin, Mr.

Shimkus, Mrs. Wilson of New Mexico, Mr. Pickering, Mr.

Fossella, Mr. Blunt, Mr. Buyer, Mr. Radanovich, Mr. Bass,

Mr. Pitts, Mrs. Bono, Mr. Walden, Mr. Terry, Mr. Ferguson,

Mr. Mike Rogers of Michigan, Mr. Otter, Mrs. Myrick, Mr.

Sullivan, Mr. Murphy, Mr. Burgess, and Mrs. Blackburn.

COMMITTEE ON FINANCIAL SERVICES: Mr. Oxley, Chairman.

COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENT REFORM: Mr. Tom Davis

of Virginia, Chairman.

COMMITTEE ON HOMELAND SECURITY: Mr. Cox, Chairman.

COMMITTEE ON HOUSE ADMINISTRATION: Mr. Ney,

Chairman.

COMMITTEE ON INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS: Mr. Hyde,

Chairman.

COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY: Mr. Sensenbrenner,

Chairman.
3

•HRES 32 EH

COMMITTEE RESOURCES: Mr. Pombo, Chairman.

COMMITTEE ON RULES: Mr. Gingrey.

COMMITTEE ON SCIENCE: Mr. Boehlert, Chairman.

COMMITTEE ON SMALL BUSINESS: Mr. Manzullo, Chairman.

COMMITTEE ON TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE: Mr. Don Young of Alaska, Chairman.

COMMITTEE ON VETERANS’ AFFAIRS: Mr. Buyer, Chairman.

COMMITTEE ON WAYS AND MEANS: Mr. Thomas, Chairman, Mr. Shaw, Mrs. Johnson of Connecticut, Mr. Herger,

Mr. McCrery, Mr. Camp, Mr. Ramstad, Mr. Nussle, Mr.

Johnson of Texas, Mr. Portman, Mr. English, Mr. Hayworth,

Mr. Weller, Mr. Hulshof, Mr. Ron Lewis of Kentucky, Mr.

Foley, Mr. Brady, Mr. Reynolds, Mr. Ryan of Wisconsin, Mr.

Cantor, Mr. Linder, Ms. Hart, Mr. Beauprez, and Mr.

Chocola.

Attest:

Clerk.