alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3295 

To suspend temporarily the duty on electric juice extractors not less than 

800 watts. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 26, 2006 

Mr. ALLEN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on electric juice extractors 

not less than 800 watts. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ELECTRIC JUICE EXTRACTORS NOT LESS THAN 

4 800 WATTS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.85.15 Electric juice extractors not less than 

800 watts (provided for in subheading 

8509.40.00) ............................................. Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
2 

•S 3295 IS 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with BILLS
Editorial Note on Part 2
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

§ 2.621 Acceptance and docketing of application for early review of site suitability issues in a combined license proceeding. ( a ) Each part of an application submitted in accordance with § 2.101(a-1) of this part will be initially treated as a tendered application. If it is determined that any one of the parts as described in § 2.101(a-1) is incomplete and not acceptable for processing, the Director of the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation will inform the applicant of this determination and the respects in which the document is deficient. Such a determination of completeness will generally be made within a period of 30 days.
( b ) ( 1 ) The Director of the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation will accept for docketing an application for a combined license for a nuclear power facility where part one of the application as described in § 2.101(a-1) is complete. Part one of any application will not be considered complete unless it contains proposed findings as required by § 2.101(a-1)(1)(i) and unless it describes the applicant's site selection process, specifies the extent to which that process involves the consideration of alternative sites, explains the relationship between that process and the application for early review of site suitability issues, and briefly describes the applicant's long-range plans for ultimate development of the site. Upon assignment of a docket number, the procedures in § 2.101(a)(3) and (4) relating to formal docketing and the submission and distribution of additional copies of the application shall be followed.
( 2 ) Additional parts of the application will be docketed upon a determination by the Director of the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation that they are complete.
( c ) If part one of the application is docketed, the Director of the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation will cause to be published in the Federal Register and send to the Governor or other appropriate official of the State in which the site is located, a notice of docketing of the application which states the purpose of the application, states the location of the proposed site, states that a notice of hearing will be published, requests comments within 120 days or such other time as may be specified on the initiation or outcome of an early site review from Federal, State, and local agencies and interested persons.
[72 FR 49478, Aug. 28, 2007, as amended at 84 FR 65643, Nov. 29, 2019]
Exhibit
32





Certification
Pursuant to 18. U.S.C. Section 1350,


As
Adopted Pursuant to


Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In
connection with the quarterly report of Banyan Rail Services Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2010 (the “Report”)
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Gary O.
Marino, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and I, Bennett
Marks, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of § 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Gary O.
Marino


Gary O.
Marino


Chairman
and Chief Executive Officer





/s/ Bennett
Marks


Bennett
Marks


Vice
President and


Chief
Financial Officer





May 24,
2010
§ 1703.102 Definitions; words denoting number, gender and tense. *Agency record* is a record in the possession and control of the Board that is associated with Board business. Agency records do not include records such as: ( 1 ) Publicly available books, periodicals, or other publications that are owned or copyrighted by non-federal sources;
( 2 ) Records solely in the possession and control of Board contractors;
( 3 ) Personal records in the possession of Board personnel that have not been circulated, were not required by the Board to be created or retained, and may be retained or discarded at the author's sole discretion. In determining whether such records are agency records the Board shall consider whether, and to what extent, the records were used in agency business;
( 4 ) Records of a personal nature that are not associated with any Board business; or
( 5 ) Non-substantive information in the calendar or schedule books of the Chairman or Members, uncirculated except for typing or recording purposes.
*Board* means the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board.
*Chairman* means the Chairman of the Board.
*Designated FOIA Officer* means the person designated by the Board to administer the Board's activities pursuant to the regulations in this part. The Designated FOIA Officer shall also be the Board officer having custody of or responsibility for agency records in the possession of the Board and shall be the Board officer responsible for authorizing or denying production of records upon requests filed pursuant to § 1703.105.
*General Counsel* means the chief legal officer of the Board.
*General Manager* means the chief administrative officer of the Board.
*Member* means a Member of the Board.
In determining the meaning of any provision of this part, unless the context indicates otherwise: the singular includes the plural; the plural includes the singular; the present tense includes the future tense; and words of one gender include the other gender.
Case 2:06-cv-00764-MEF-DRB Document 2 Filed 08/24/2006 Page 1 of 5
Case 2:06-cv-00764-MEF-DRB Document 2 Filed 08/24/2006 Page 2 of 5
Case 2:06-cv-00764-MEF-DRB Document 2 Filed 08/24/2006 Page 3 of 5
Case 2:06-cv-00764-MEF-DRB Document 2 Filed 08/24/2006 Page 4 of 5
Case 2:06-cv-00764-MEF-DRB Document 2 Filed 08/24/2006 Page 5 of 5
Case 2:06-cv-00764-MEF-DRB Document 2-2 Filed 08/24/2006 Page 1 of 10
Case 2:06-cv-00764-MEF-DRB Document 2-2 Filed 08/24/2006 Page 2 of 10
Case 2:06-cv-00764-MEF-DRB Document 2-2 Filed 08/24/2006 Page 3 of 10
Case 2:06-cv-00764-MEF-DRB Document 2-2 Filed 08/24/2006 Page 4 of 10
Case 2:06-cv-00764-MEF-DRB Document 2-2 Filed 08/24/2006 Page 5 of 10
Case 2:06-cv-00764-MEF-DRB Document 2-2 Filed 08/24/2006 Page 6 of 10
Case 2:06-cv-00764-MEF-DRB Document 2-2 Filed 08/24/2006 Page 7 of 10
Case 2:06-cv-00764-MEF-DRB Document 2-2 Filed 08/24/2006 Page 8 of 10
Case 2:06-cv-00764-MEF-DRB Document 2-2 Filed 08/24/2006 Page 9 of 10
Case 2:06-cv-00764-MEF-DRB Document 2-2 Filed 08/24/2006 Page 10 of 10
2019.705-4 Reviewing the subcontracting plan.       The contracting officer may accept the terms of an overall or “master” company subcontracting plan incorporated by reference into a specific subcontracting plan submitted by the apparent successful offeror/bid for a specific contract, only upon ensuring that the required information, goals, and assurances are included in accordance with FAR 19.704.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 2019.7 - Subcontracting With Small Business, Small Disadvantaged Business, and Women-Owned Small Business Concerns
§ 431.152 Definitions concerning commercial clothes washers. *AEER* means active-mode energy efficiency ratio, in pounds per kilowatt-hour per cycle (lbs/kWh/cycle), as determined in section 4.8 of appendix J to subpart B of part 430 (when using appendix J).
*Basic model* means all units of a given type of covered product (or class thereof) manufactured by one manufacturer, having the same primary energy source, and which have essentially identical electrical, physical, and functional (or hydraulic) characteristics that affect energy consumption, energy efficiency, water consumption, or water efficiency.
*Commercial clothes washer* means a soft-mounted front-loading or soft-mounted top-loading clothes washer that— ( 1 ) Has a clothes container compartment that— ( i ) For horizontal-axis clothes washers, is not more than 3.5 cubic feet; and
( ii ) For vertical-axis clothes washers, is not more than 4.0 cubic feet; and
( 2 ) Is designed for use in— ( i ) Applications in which the occupants of more than one household will be using the clothes washer, such as multi-family housing common areas and coin laundries; or
( ii ) Other commercial applications.
*IWF* means integrated water factor, in gallons per cubic feet per cycle (gal/cu ft/cycle), as determined in section 4.2.12 of appendix J2 to subpart B of part 430 (when using appendix J2).
MEF *J2* means modified energy factor, in cu ft/kWh/cycle, as determined in section 4.5 of appendix J2 to subpart B of part 430 (when using appendix J2).
*WER* means water efficiency ratio, in pounds per gallon per cycle (lbs/gal/cycle), as determined in section 4.7 of appendix J to subpart B of part 430 (when using appendix J).
[87 FR 33405, June 1, 2022]
#### In the Matter of Christian M. Welch, Appellant, v Amy E. Welch, Respondent. (And Another Related Proceeding.)

Submitted September 4, 2007;

decided November 27, 2007

Reported below, 39 AD3d 910.

*989Motion for leave to appeal dismissed for failure to demonstrate timeliness as required by section 500.22 (b) (2) of the Rules of Practice of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.22 [b] [2]).
Exhibit
      32





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








The
      undersigned hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the quarterly
      report of United States Basketball League, Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly
      period ended November 30, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section
      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
      contained in such quarterly report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all
      material respects the financial condition and results of operation of United
      States Basketball League, Inc.





Date:
      January 22, 2008








/s/
                Daniel T. Meisenheimer, IIIDaniel
                T. Meisenheimer, IIIPresident





Date:
      January 22, 2008








/s/
                Richard C. MeisenheimerRichard
                C. MeisenheimerChief
                Financial Officer
§ 986.175 Handler inventory. ( a ) Handlers shall submit to the Council a year-end inventory report following August 31 each fiscal year. Handlers shall file such reports by September 10. Should September 10 fall on a weekend, reports are due by the first business day following September 10. Such reports shall be reported to the Council on APC Form 5 and include: ( 1 ) The name and address of the handler;
( 2 ) The total weight and type of inshell pecans in inventory, regardless of country of origin;
( 3 ) The total weight and type of shelled pecans in inventory, regardless of country of origin;
( 4 ) The total weight and type of inshell pecans committed, not shipped, for export and domestic shipments, and any uncommitted inventory, regardless of country of origin;
( 5 ) The total weight and type of shelled pecans committed, not shipped, for export and domestic shipments, and any uncommitted inventory, regardless of country of origin;
( 6 ) The combined total inventory for inshell and shelled pecans calculated on an inshell basis, and combined weight committed, not shipped, for exports and domestic shipments, and any uncommitted inventory;
( 7 ) Total weight and type of domestic pecans handled for the fiscal year;
( 8 ) Total assessments owed, assessments paid to date, and remaining assessments due to be paid by the due date of the year-end inventory report for the fiscal year;
( 9 ) The average price paid for all inshell pecans purchased during the fiscal year regardless of how the pecans are handled, including pecans from outside the production area; and
( 10 ) The average yield of shelled pecans per pound of inshell pecans shelled during the fiscal year.
( b ) [Reserved]
[82 FR 56155, Nov. 28, 2017, as amended at 84 FR 8411, Mar. 8, 2019; 85 FR 19654, Apr. 8, 2020]
##### 



Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) UNDER THE EXCHANGE ACT
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of B.H.I.T. Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant is made known to us by others, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Date: November 3, 2005
    By:
    /s/ James Benenson, Jr.James Benenson, Jr.President and Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 10.20


 


Description of Non-Employee Director
Compensation


 


Compensation for
non-employee directors of Equifax Inc. (the “Company”) effective January 1,
2010 consists of the following:


 


·                  a $60,000 annual cash retainer, payable quarterly in arrears, for all
non-employee directors; new directors receive a prorated cash retainer in the
quarter from the date they were elected;


 


·                  a $7,500 committee chair annual cash retainer payable quarterly in
arrears and prorated for new committee chairs for the quarter from the date
they were appointed;


 


·                  A supplemental annual cash retainer of
$7,500 for the Chair of the Audit Committee, and $2,500 for the Chair of the
Compensation, Human Resources & Management Succession Committee;


 


·                  following each annual meeting of shareholders of the
Company, continuing directors will receive a grant of Company common stock, in
the form of restricted stock units (“RSUs”) with a market value on the grant
date of $125,000.  These grants vest over
a period of one year, subject to accelerated vesting in certain events; and


 


·                  upon first being elected a director of the Company, a
director will receive a one-time initial grant of RSUs  vesting over a three-year period, with a
grant date market value of $175,000. These grants vest over a period of three
years, subject to accelerated vesting in certain events.


 


Cash retainers and equity
awards may be deferred under the applicable Director deferred compensation
plan.


 


The Board of Directors
has a policy on stock ownership that requires each non-employee director to
beneficially own common stock of the Company having a value which is at least
four times the annual cash retainer fee, no later than the fourth anniversary
of the annual meeting at which the director was first elected to the Board.
#### In the Matter of Lawrence E. Elovich, Appellant, v. William D. Meisser et al., Constituting the Board of Elections of Nassau County, and Lawrence Zuckerman et al., Respondents.

In a proceeding to invalidate petitions designating respondents Zuckerman and Deangelis as candidates in the Democratic Party Primary Election to be held on June 17, 1969 for the Party position of County Committeeman for the 16th Election District of the 14th Assembly District of the County of Nassau, and for injunctive relief, petitioner appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered June 5, 1969, which denied the application and dismissed the petition in the proceeding. Order reversed, on the law, without costs, and proceeding remitted to the Special Term for (1) a hearing of the objections to the designating petitions and (2) a new determination *(Matter of Elovich*v. *Meisser,*32 A D 2d 795). No questions of fact were considered on this, appeal. Hopkins, Benjamin and Martuscello, JJ., concur; Beldoek, P. J., and Rabin, J., dissent and vote to affirm the order, for the reasons set forth in their dissenting memorandum in *Matter of Elovich*v. *Meisser*(32 A D 2d 7.95).
# Subpart 2805.2 - Synopses of Proposed Contract Actions

**Parent topic:**PART 2805 - PUBLICIZING CONTRACT ACTIONS

## 2805.202 Exceptions.

The HCA or designee is the agency head for the purposes of the determination required by FAR 5.202(b).
#### § 11.1 Purpose.

This part establishes the requirements for special nuclear material access authorization, and the criteria and procedures for resolving questions concerning the eligibility of individuals to receive special nuclear material access authorization for conduct of certain activities, licensed or otherwise, which involve access to or control over special nuclear material.
Searched for **https://www.ssa.gov/pubs/ES-05-10903.pdf**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **https://www.ssa.gov/pubs/ES-05-10903.pdf**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.
# Subpart 1216.2—Fixed-Price Contracts

**Parent topic:**PART 1216—TYPES OF CONTRACTS

## 1216.203 Fixed-price contracts with economic price adjustment.

## 1216.203-4 Contract clauses.

## 1216.203-470 Solicitation provision.

The contracting officer shall insert the provision at 1252.216–70, Evaluation of Offers Subject to an Economic Price Adjustment Clause, in solicitations containing an economic price adjustment clause.
§ 1017.21 Limited access. ( a ) A person who is not eligible for routine access to specific UCNI under § 1017.20 may request limited access to such UCNI by sending a written request to the DOE Program Secretarial Officer or NNSA Deputy or Associate Administrator with cognizance over the information. The written request must include the following: ( 1 ) The name, current residence or business address, birthplace, birth date, and country of citizenship of the person submitting the request;
( 2 ) A description of the specific UCNI for which limited access is being requested;
( 3 ) A description of the purpose for which the UCNI is needed; and,
( 4 ) Certification by the requester that he or she: ( i ) Understands and will follow these regulations; and
( ii ) Understands that he or she is subject to the civil and criminal penalties under Subpart F of this part.
( b ) The decision whether to grant the request for limited access is based on the following criteria: ( 1 ) The sensitivity of the UCNI for which limited access is being requested;
( 2 ) The approving official's evaluation of the likelihood that the requester will disseminate the UCNI to unauthorized individuals; and,
( 3 ) The approving official's evaluation of the likelihood that the requester will use the UCNI for illegal purposes.
( c ) Within 30 days of receipt of the request for limited access, the appropriate DOE Program Secretarial Officer or NNSA Deputy or Associate Administrator must notify the requester if limited access is granted or denied, or if the determination cannot be made within 30 days, of the date when the determination will be made.
( d ) A person granted limited access to specific UCNI is not an Authorized Individual and may not further disseminate the UCNI to anyone.