alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 245 

Expressing support for designation of April 23 as ‘‘Barbara Johns Day’’ 

to highlight the important role Ms. Barbara Rose Johns (Powell) played 

in the Civil Rights Movement, in Brown v. Board of Education and 

the desegregation of schools, and her role in the history of the United 

States and the lives of United States citizens. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 3, 2017 

Mr. GARRETT (for himself, Mr. SCOTT of Virginia, Mr. BRAT, and Mr. TAYLOR) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for designation of April 23 as ‘‘Barbara 

Johns Day’’ to highlight the important role Ms. Barbara 

Rose Johns (Powell) played in the Civil Rights Movement, in Brown v. Board of Education and the desegregation of schools, and her role in the history of the 

United States and the lives of United States citizens. 

Whereas on April 23, 1951, at the age of 16, Johns led a 

student strike for equal education at R.R. Moton High 

School in Prince Edward, Virginia; 

Whereas after securing legal support from the NAACP, these 

Moton students filed suit in Davis v. Prince Edward 

County, the largest and only student initiated case conVerDate Sep 11 2014 01:44 Apr 04, 2017 Jkt 069200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6300 E:\BILLS\HR245.IH HR245

SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 245 IH 

solidated into Brown v. Board of Education, the landmark 1954 United States Supreme Court decision declaring segregation and the ‘‘separate but equal’’ principle in 

public schools to be unconstitutional; and 

Whereas April 23 would be an appropriate date to designate 

as ‘‘Barbara Johns Day’’: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) supports the designation of ‘‘Barbara Johns 

3 Day’’ to highlight the important role Ms. Johns 

4 played in the lives of United States citizens; 

5 (2) requests that the President issue a procla6 mation calling upon the people of the United States 

7 to observe ‘‘Barbara Johns Day’’ with appropriate 

8 ceremonies and activities; and 

9 (3) encourages the people of the United States 

10 to consider the role and impact of Ms. Johns in the 

11 Civil Rights Movement and the role students have 

12 had in American history. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
SUBCHAPTER C - CONTRACTING METHODS

AND CONTRACT TYPES

PART 813 - SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION PROCEDURES

PART 814 - SEALED BIDDING

PART 815 - CONTRACTING BY NEGOTIATION

PART 816 - TYPES OF CONTRACTS

PART 817 - SPECIAL CONTRACTING METHODS

PART 813 - SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION PROCEDURES

813.003-70 General policy.

Subpart 813.1 - Procedures

813.102 Source list.

813.106 Soliciting competition, evaluation of quotations or offers, award and

documentation.

813.106-70 Soliciting competition, evaluation of quotations or offers, award and

documentation - the Veterans First Contracting Program.

Subpart 813.2 [Reserved]

Subpart 813.3 - Simplified Acquisition Methods

813.305-70 VA's imprest funds and third party drafts policy.

PART 814 - SEALED BIDDING

Subpart 814.1 [Reserved]

Subpart 814.2 - Solicitation of Bids

814.201 Preparation of invitations for bids

814.201-2 Part I - The Schedule.

814.201-6 Solicitation provisions.

814.202 General rules for solicitation of bids.

814.202-4 Bid samples.

Subpart 814.3 - Submission of Bids

814.304 Submission, modification, and withdrawal of bids.

Subpart 814.4 [Reserved]

PART 815 - CONTRACTING BY NEGOTIATION

Subpart 815.3 - Source Selection

815.304-70 Evaluation factor commitments.

815.304-71 Solicitation provision and clause.

815.370 Only one offer.

815.370-1 Policy.

815.370-2 Promote competition.

815.370-3 Fair and reasonable price.

815.370-4 Exceptions.

815.370-5 Solicitation provision.

Subparts 815.4 - 815.6 [Reserved]

PART 816 - TYPES OF CONTRACTS

Subpart 816.1 [Reserved]

Subpart 816.2 - Fixed-Price Contracts

816.203 Fixed-price contracts with economic price adjustment.

816.203-4 Contract clauses.

Subpart 816.5 - Indefinite-Delivery Contracts
816.505 Ordering.

816.506-70 Requirements - supplement for mortuary services.

816.570 Ordering officers.

Subpart 816.7 - Agreements

816.770 Consignment agreements.

Subpart 816.70 [Reserved]

PART 817 - SPECIAL CONTRACTING METHODS

Subparts 817.1 - 817.4 [Reserved]

Subpart 817.5 - Interagency Acquisitions

817.501 General.

Subpart 817.70 - Undefinitized Contract Actions

817.7000 Scope.

817.7001 Definitions.

817.7002 Exceptions.

817.7003 Policy.

817.7004 Limitations.

817.7004-1 Authorization.

817.7004-2 Price ceiling.

817.7004-3 Definitization schedule.

817.7004-4 Final price negotiation - profit.

817.7005 Contract clause.
1511.011-79 Information resources management.       The Contracting Officer shall insert the clause at 1552.211-79, Compliance with EPA Policies for Information Resource Management, in all solicitations and contracts.    **Parent topic:** PART 1511 - DESCRIBING AGENCY NEEDS
# San

# Joaquin Valley 

# TM HEALTHY

# AIR LIVINGAIR 

### PfILIUTIfll{ CflI{TRflL DISTRICT
December 6,2013 Mr. 

### Mike Guzzetta, Manager Rule Evaluation Section California 

### Air Resources Board P.O. Box 

### 2815 Sacramento, CA 

### 95812 Dear Mr. Guzzetta: 

### Attached is

### the Rule

### Action Package 

### for Rule

### 4702 (lnternal Combustion Engines) adopted by

### the District's 

### Governing Board 

### on November 

### 14,2013. We request 

### the California 

### Air Resources Board (ARB) transmit 

### this rule and the appropriate documentation to

### the United States Environmental Protection 

### Agency (EPA) as 

### a SIP revision. Included in

### this Rule

### Action Package arethe

### following attachments: 

## 1. ARB SIP 

### Completeness Checklist 

## 2. ARBAPCD/AQMD Rule Evaluation Form 

## 3. Clean copy 

### of Rule 4702 

## 4. Underline/Strikeout Copy 

### of Rule 4702 

## 5. Governing Board Resolution 

## 6. Governing Board Memo 

## 7. Evidence 

### of Public Hearing 

## 8. Final 

### Staff Report

### with appendices lf

### you have any 

### questions, please contact 

### Anna Myers 

### at (559) 230-6100 

### or byemail at 

### anna.myers@valleyair.org. The District thanks 

### you and your staff for 

### your assistance.

tr r

### of Strategies 

### and Incentives 

### Attachments

Seyed Sadredin Executive DirectorlAir Pollution Control 0fficer

lllorthern Region 4800 Entsrpr¡se Way Modesto, CA 95356-8718 TsL (209) 557.ô400 FAX: (209) 557.8475 Gentral ßegion (Main Officol 1990 E. Gettysburg Avenue Fresno, CA 93726.0244 Tel:1559) 230.6000 FAX: (559) 230.6061 Southorn Rogion 34946 Flyover Court Bakerslield, CA 93308.9725 Teh 661.392.5500 FAX: 861.392-5585 www.valleyair.org www.healthyaitliving.com Printodmr@ycHprps. O
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of

-- ) ) Clark Construction Group, LLC ) ) Under Contract No. W912DR-09-C-0052 ) APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: ASBCA No. 60791

Robert M. Moore, Esq. Robert D. Windus, Esq. Casey J. McKinnon, Esq.

Moore & Lee, LLP McLean, VA APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Thomas H. Gourlay, Jr., Esq. Engineer ChiefTrial Attorney Scott C. Seufert, Esq. David B. Jerger, Esq.

Engineer Trial Attorneys U.S. Army Engineer District, Baltimore ORDER OF DISMISSAL The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice. Dated: 13 January 2017 

# /

..**··~7/ ~**  

# ./',///q42 

# t0---- / MARK N. STEMPLER 7 Administrative Judge Vice Chairman Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals I certify that the foregoing is a true copy ofthe Order ofDismissal ofthe Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals in ASBCA No. 60791, Appeal ofClark Construction Group, LLC, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. Dated:

JEFFREY D. GARDIN Recorder, Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals
Case 1:06-cv-00801-MEF-VPM Document 2 Filed 09/06/2006 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:06-cv-00801-MEF-VPM Document 2 Filed 09/06/2006 Page 2 of 2
#### § 429.130 Collection of civil penalties.

If any person fails to pay an assessment of a civil penalty after it has become a final and unappealable order under § 429.126 or after the appropriate District Court has entered final judgment in favor of the Department under § 429.128, the General Counsel (or delegee) shall institute an action to recover the amount of such penalty in any appropriate District Court of the United States. In such action, the validity and appropriateness of such final assessment order or judgment shall not be subject to review.
#### § 1040.89-1 General responsibilities.

Each DOE recipient has primary responsibility to ensure that its programs or activities are in compliance with the Act and these regulations. A recipient also has responsibility to maintain records, provide information, and afford access to its records to DOE, to the extent required to determine whether it is in compliance with the Act and these regulations.

[50 FR 8089, Feb. 27, 1985, as amended at 68 FR 51348, Aug. 26, 2003]
Editorial Note on Part 35
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 35 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

§ 35.633 Full calibration measurements on remote afterloader units. ( a ) A licensee authorized to use a remote afterloader unit for medical use shall perform full calibration measurements on each unit— ( 1 ) Before the first medical use of the unit;
( 2 ) Before medical use under the following conditions: ( i ) Following replacement of the source or following reinstallation of the unit in a new location outside the facility; and
( ii ) Following any repair of the unit that includes removal of the source or major repair of the components associated with the source exposure assembly; and
( 3 ) At intervals not exceeding 1 quarter for high dose-rate, medium dose-rate, and pulsed dose-rate remote afterloader units with sources whose half-life exceeds 75 days; and
( 4 ) At intervals not exceeding 1 year for low dose-rate remote afterloader units.
( b ) To satisfy the requirement of paragraph (a) of this section, full calibration measurements must include, as applicable, determination of: ( 1 ) The output within ±5 percent;
( 2 ) Source positioning accuracy to within ±1 millimeter;
( 3 ) Source retraction with backup battery upon power failure;
( 4 ) Length of the source transfer tubes;
( 5 ) Timer accuracy and linearity over the typical range of use;
( 6 ) Length of the applicators; and
( 7 ) Function of the source transfer tubes, applicators, and transfer tube-applicator interfaces.
( c ) A licensee shall use the dosimetry system described in § 35.630(a) to measure the output.
( d ) A licensee shall make full calibration measurements required by paragraph (a) of this section in accordance with published protocols accepted by nationally recognized bodies.
( e ) In addition to the requirements for full calibrations for low dose-rate remote afterloader units in paragraph (b) of this section, a licensee shall perform an autoradiograph of the source(s) to verify inventory and source(s) arrangement at intervals not exceeding 1 quarter.
( f ) For low dose-rate remote afterloader units, a licensee may use measurements provided by the source manufacturer that are made in accordance with paragraphs (a) through (e) of this section.
( g ) A licensee shall mathematically correct the outputs determined in paragraph (b)(1) of this section for physical decay at intervals consistent with 1 percent physical decay.
( h ) Full calibration measurements required by paragraph (a) of this section and physical decay corrections required by paragraph (g) of this section must be performed by the authorized medical physicist.
( i ) A licensee shall retain a record of each calibration in accordance with § 35.2632.
**EXHIBIT 32.1CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

**     In connection with the quarterly report of CNB Corporationon Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2004 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, W. Jennings Duncan,President and Chief Executive Officer and Paul R. Dusenbury, Treasurer andChief Financial Officer, of the CNB Corporation, each certifies to the best ofhis knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:**

**     1.     The above-referenced Form 10-Q fully complieswith the requirements of            Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and**

**     2.     The information contained inthe above referenced Form 10-Q fairly            presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results            of operations of the Company.**

**Date:   November 10, 2004**

**                                         /s/W.JenningsDuncan                                                         W.Jennings Duncan                                         Presidentand Chief Executive Officer                                         /s/PaulR.Dusenbury                                                          PaulR. Dusenbury                                         Treasurerand Chief Financial Officer**
839.203-70 Information and communication technology accessibility standards - contract clause and provision.       (a) The contracting officer shall insert the provision at 852.239-75, Information and Communication Technology Accessibility Notice, in all solicitations.          (b) The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 852.239-76, Information and Communication Technology Accessibility, in all contracts and orders.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 839.2 - Information and Communication Technology
Case 3:06-cv-00772-WKW-TFM Document 7 Filed 09/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
Jonathan B. Hill

T: +1 202 776 2725

jhill@cooley.com

1299 PENNSYLVANIA AV ENUE, NW, SUITE 700, WASHINGTON, DC 20004

- 2400 T: (202) 842

- 7800 F: (202) 842

- 7899 WWW.COOLEY.COM June 9, 2014

Department of Transportation

Docket Management System

1200 New Jersey Ave, SW

Washington, DC 20590

Re: Docket F AA

- 2014

- 0355

Dear Sir or Madam:

The name of one of the principals of Flying

- Cam Inc. identified in the May 27, 2014 exemption

filing is misspelled. Please correct your records and amend the exemption filing to reflect that

Mr. Haik Gazarian’s name was misspelled in the third paragraph of the exemption request.

Please indicate in all correspondence and in the record that the correct spelling of his name is

as follows: “Haik Gazarian”.

Please direct all correspondence for Flying

- Cam Inc. to Mr. Gazarian at

h.gazarian.flying.cam@gmail.com

.

Thank you for your attention to this matter.

Sincerely yours,

Jonathan B. Hill

Counsel for Flying

- Cam Inc.

cc: James Williams

Robert Pappas

Dean Griffith, Esq.

Thuy Cooper

107832623 v1

06/09/14
Subpart 836.2 - Special Aspects of Contracting for Construction    **Parent topic:** PART 836 - CONSTRUCTION AND ARCHITECT-ENGINEER CONTRACTS836.202 Specifications.836.202-70 Specifications - use of equal products.       Upon approval of the justification documentation required by FAR 11.105, Items peculiar to one manufacturer, the contracting officer shall include the clause found at 852.236-90, Restriction on Submission and Use of Equal Products, in solicitations and contracts. The contracting officer shall complete the clause by inserting the items which have been approved for restriction to a brand name. This clause also places offerors or bidders on notice that the “brand name” provisions of any clause or provision that may authorize the submission of an “equal” product, shall not apply to the specific items listed in clause 852.236-90.836.203 Government estimate of construction costs.836.203-70 Protection of the independent government estimate - sealed bid.       For sealed bid acquisitions the contracting officer or bid custodian is not authorized to release the basis for calculating the estimate at any time. The person preparing the independent government estimate (IGE) shall -          (a) Designate the IGE as “For Official Use Only (FOUO)”;          (b) The contracting officer or bid custodian shall file a sealed copy of the IGE with the bids. (In the case of two-step acquisitions, the contracting officer or bid custodian accomplishes this during the second step);          (c) After the bids are read and recorded during a Public Bid Opening, remove the “For Official Use Only (FOUO)” designation then read and record the estimate as if it were a bid, in the same detail as the bids; and          (d) In instances where only one bid has been received, the government estimate shall not be read by the contracting officer as it may be needed to conduct negotiations with the offeror.836.204 Disclosure of the magnitude of construction projects.       The contracting officer shall utilize the estimated price ranges defined in FAR 36.204(a) through (e) as further supplemented below when identifying the magnitude of a VA project in advance notices and solicitations:          (f) For estimated price ranges between $1,000,000 and $5,000,000, the contracting officer shall identify the magnitude of a VA project in advance notices and solicitations in terms of the following price ranges:          (1) Between $1,000,000 and $2,000,000.          (2) Between $2,000,000 and $5,000,000.          (g) Between $5,000,000 and $10,000,000.          (h) For estimated price ranges greater than $10,000,000, the contracting officer shall identify the magnitude of a VA project in advance notices and solicitations in terms of one of the following price ranges:          (1) Between $10,000,000 and $20,000,000.          (2) Between $20,000,000 and $50,000,000.          (3) Between $50,000,000 and $100,000,000.          (4) Between $100,000,000 and $150,000,000.          (5) Between $150,000,000 and $200,000,000.          (6) Between $200,000,000 and $250,000,000.          (7) More than $250,000,000.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

EDWARD J. CURTIS

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 17

- 860

[ June 7, 2018 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit,

Broward County ; Geoffrey D. Cohen , Judge; L.T. Case No.

16013890CF10A

.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Benjamin Eisenberg, Assistant

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Don M. Rogers,

Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

W ARNER

, T AYLOR and L EVINE

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 244 (Tuesday, December 21, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 80045]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-31938]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ELECTION ASSISTANCE COMMISSION


Federal Advisory Committee Act; Board of Advisors Charter Renewal

AGENCY: Election Assistance Commission.

ACTION: Notice of Charter Renewal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 
92-463), the purpose of this notice is to announce that the Election 
Assistance Commission (EAC) has renewed the charter for the Board of 
Advisors for a two-year period through December 14, 2012. The Board of 
Advisors is a federal advisory committee under the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act.

DATES: Renewed through December 14, 2012.

ADDRESSES: Election Assistance Commission, 1201 New York Avenue, NW., 
Suite 300, Washington, DC 20005.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Thomas R. Wilkey, Designated Federal 
Officer, at (202) 566-3100. E-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6d0f020c1f09020b0c091b041e021f1e2d080c0e430a021b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="5d3f323c2f39323b3c392b342e322f2e1d383c3e733a322b">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Board of Advisors is a Federal advisory 
committee created by statute whose mission is to advise EAC through 
review of the voluntary voting system guidelines (VVSG) described in 
Title II Part 3 of HAVA when EAC proposes updates to the VVSG; through 
review of the voluntary guidance described under Title III subtitle B 
of HAVA; and through review of the best practices recommendations 
contained in the report submitted under Section 242(b) of Title II of 
HAVA.

Thomas R. Wilkey,
Executive Director, U.S. Election Assistance Commission.
[FR Doc. 2010-31938 Filed 12-20-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-KF-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit
32





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The
undersigned hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the quarterly
report of United States Basketball League, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly
period ended November 30, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
contained in such quarterly report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material
respects the financial condition and results of operation of United States
Basketball League, Inc.





Date:  January
      14, 2010/s/ Daniel T. Meisenheimer
    IIIDaniel
      T. Meisenheimer IIIPresidentDate:  January
      14, 2010/s/ Richard C. MeisenheimerRichard
      C. MeisenheimerChief
      Financial Officer
Case 2:06-cr-00198-WKW-CSC Document 42 Filed 12/28/2006 Page 1 of 1