alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
2015.606-1 Receipt and initial review.       (a) The Division of Contracts and Property Management shall acknowledge receipt of an unsolicited proposal, complete a preliminary review, assign a docket number, and send copies of the unsolicited proposal to the appropriate program office Director(s) or designee for evaluation.          (b) The Division of Contracts and Property Management shall be responsible for controlling reproduction and distribution of proposal material by notifying evaluators of their responsibilities and tracking the number of proposals received and forwarded to evaluators.          (c) An acknowledgment letter will be sent to the proposer by The Division of Contracts and Property Management. The letter will provide an estimated date for a funding decision or identifying the reasons for non-acceptance of the proposal for review in accordance with FAR 15.606-1(b) and FAR 15.606-1(c).    **Parent topic:** Subpart 2015.6 - Unsolicited Proposals
#### ROSENKRANTZ v. GREENHUT SIEGEL COOPER CO.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

December 31, 1914.)

Action by Morris Rosenkrantz against the Greenhut Siegel Cooper Company.

No opinion. Motion denied, with $10 costs. Order filed. See, also, 150 N. .Y. Supp. 1110.
#### § 436.15 Formatting cost data.

In establishing cost data under §§ 436.16 and 436.17 and measuring cost effectiveness by the modes of analysis described by § 436.19 through § 436.22, a format for accomplishing the analysis which includes all required input data and assumptions shall be used. Subject to § 436.18(b), Federal agencies are encouraged to use worksheets or computer software referenced in the Life Cycle Cost Manual for the Federal Energy Management Program.
Case 2:06-cv-00790-WC Document 37 Filed 04/24/2007 Page 1 of 6
Case 2:06-cv-00790-WC Document 37 Filed 04/24/2007 Page 2 of 6
Case 2:06-cv-00790-WC Document 37 Filed 04/24/2007 Page 3 of 6
Case 2:06-cv-00790-WC Document 37 Filed 04/24/2007 Page 4 of 6
Case 2:06-cv-00790-WC Document 37 Filed 04/24/2007 Page 5 of 6
Case 2:06-cv-00790-WC Document 37 Filed 04/24/2007 Page 6 of 6
#### In the Matter of Long Island Business Aviation Association, Inc., Appellant, v Town of Babylon et al., Respondents.

[815 NYS2d 217]

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of *795Babylon dated January 29, 2004, which, after a hearing, granted the application of Stew Leonard’s and Avilas, Inc., for special use permits and an area variance, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Loughlin, J.), entered January 21, 2005, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with one bill of costs to the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs.

The Supreme Court correctly denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding on the ground that the petitioner lacks standing *(see*Town Law § 267-c [1]). In order to establish standing, the petitioner must show that it would suffer direct injury different from that suffered by the public at large *(see Matter of Sun-Brite Car Wash v Board of Zoning & Appeals of Town of N. Hempstead,*69 NY2d 406, 413-414 [1987]; *Matter of Meehan v County of Westchester,*3 AD3d 533 [2004]; *Matter of Rediker v Zoning Bd. of Appeals of Town of Philipstown,*280 AD2d 548, 549-550 [2001]). Here, however, the potential injuries alleged by the petitioner were speculative and therefore insufficient to establish standing *(see New York State Assn. of Nurse Anesthetists v Novello,*2 NY3d 207, 211 [2004]; *Matter of Brighton Residents Against Violence to Children v MW Props.,*304 AD2d 53, 56-57).

Furthermore, the petitioner failed to show that the interests it asserted were within the zone of interest protected by the zoning laws at issue *(see*Town Law § 267-b [3]; Code of the Town of Babylon §§ 213-12, 213-13; *Matter of Sun-Brite Car Wash, supra; Matter of Kemp v Zoning Bd. of Appeals of Vil. of Wappingers Falls,*216 AD2d 466 [1995]). Accordingly, the petitioner failed to establish its standing as an association to bring this proceeding *(see Society of Plastics Indus. v County of Suffolk,*77 NY2d 761, 775 [1991]; *Matter of Long Is. Pine Barrens Socy. v Supervisor of Town of E. Hampton,*293 AD2d 616 [2002]; *see also Matter of Douglaston Civic Assn. v Galvin,*36 NY2d 1, 7 [1974]).

The petitioner’s remaining contentions are without merit. Florio, J.P., Luciano, Spolzino and Fisher, JJ, concur.
PGI 232.409-1 Recommendation for approval.

To ensure uniform application of this subpart (see FAR 32.402(e)(1)), the departmental/agency

contract financing office shall prepare the documents required by FAR 32.409-1(e) and (f).

Parent topic: PGI 232.409 RESERVED
§ 52.303 Criminal penalties. ( a ) Section 223 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, provides for criminal sanctions for willful violation of, attempted violation of, or conspiracy to violate, any regulation issued under Sections 161b, 161i, or 161o of the Act. For purposes of Section 223, all the regulations in part 52 are issued under one or more of Sections 161b, 161i, or 160o, except for the sections listed in paragraph (b) of this section.
( b ) The regulations in part 52 that are not issued under Sections 161b, 161i, or 161o for the purposes of Section 223 are as follows: §§ 52.0, 52.1, 52.2, 52.3, 52.7, 52.8, 52.9, 52.10, 52.11, 52.12, 52.13, 52.15, 52.16, 52.17, 52.18, 52.21, 52.23, 52.24, 52.26 52.28, 52.29, 52.31, 52.33, 52.39, 52.41, 52.43, 52.45, 52.46, 52.47, 52.48, 52.51, 52.53, 52.54, 52.55, 52.57, 52.59, 52.61, 52.63, 52.71, 52.73, 52.75, 52.77, 52.79, 52.80, 52.81, 52.83, 52.85, 52.87, 52.93, 52.97, 52.98, 52.103, 52.104, 52.105, 52.107, 52.109, 52.131, 52.133, 52.135, 52.136, 52.137, 52.139, 52.141, 52.143, 52.145, 52.147, 52.151, 52.153, 52.155, 52.156, 52.157, 52.158, 52.159, 52.161, 52.163, 52.165, 52.167, 52.171, 52.173, 52.175, 52.177, 52.179, 52.181, 52.301, and 52.303.
[72 FR 49517, Aug. 28, 2007, as amended at 85 FR 65663, Oct. 16, 2020]
§ 503.32 Lack of alternate fuel supply at a cost which does not substantially exceed the cost of using imported petroleum. ( a ) *Eligibility.* Section 212(a)(1) (A)(ii) of the Act provides for a permanent exemption due to lack of an alternate fuel supply at a cost which does not substantially exceed the cost of using imported petroleum. To qualify a petitioner must certify that: ( 1 ) A good faith effort has been made to obtain an adequate and reliable supply of an alternate fuel for use as a primary energy source of the quality and quantity necessary to conform with the design and operational requirements of the proposed unit;
( 2 ) The cost of using such a supply would substantially exceed the cost of using imported petroleum as a primary energy source during the useful life of the proposed unit as defined in § 503.6 (cost calculation) of these regulations;
( 3 ) No alternate power supply exists, as required under § 503.8 of these regulations.
( 4 ) Use of mixtures is not feasible, as required under § 503.9 of these regulations; and
( 5 ) Alternative sites are not available, as required under § 503.11 of these regulations.
( b ) *Evidence required in support of a petition.* The petition must include the following evidence in order to make the demonstration required by this section: ( 1 ) Duly executed certifications required under paragraph (a) of this section;
( 2 ) Exhibits containing the basis for certifications required under paragraph (a) of this section (including those factual and analytical materials deemed by the petitioner to be sufficient to support the granting of this exemption);
( 3 ) Environmental impact analysis, as required under § 503.13 of these regulations;
( 4 ) Fuels search, as required under § 503.14 of these regulations; and
( 5 ) All data required by § 503.6 (cost calculation) of these regulations necessary for computing the cost calculation formula.
[46 FR 59903, Dec. 7, 1981, as amended at 47 FR 15315, Apr. 9, 1982; 54 FR 52895, Dec. 22, 1989]
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

RUSSELL E. GARNER, *

*

Plaintiff, *

*

vs. * CASE NUMBER: 01:06cv781-MHT

*

PROGRESSIVE DIRECT INSURANCE*

COMPANY, *

*

 Defendant. *

DEFENDANT’S EXHIBIT LIST

Comes Now, the Defendant, Progressive Direct Insurance Company, by and through

undersigned counsel, and does hereby submit the following exhibit list:

Exhibit 1: Any and all pleadings, including the Complaint filed by the Plaintiff.

Exhibit 2: Any and all discoverythat has been exchanged between the parties, including

the Plaintiff’s Initial and Supplemental Responses to Defendant’s

Interrogatories and Requests for Production.

Exhibit 3: Any and all recordsrelated to the Plaintiff’s current and/or past employment.

Exhibit 4: Records of J. Walter Jacobs Ph.D. which are attached as Exhibit 1 to Dr.

Jacob’s deposition.

Exhibit 5: Medical Records of Dr. Michelle Turnley which are attached as Exhibit 1 to

Dr. Turnley’s deposition.

Exhibit 7 Any exhibit attached as an exhibit to any deposition taken in this case.

Exhibit 8: Any exhibit listed by the Plaintiff.

Exhibit 9: Any exhibit necessary for rebuttal or impeachment purposes.

Case 1:06-cv-00781-MHT-TFM Document 22 Filed 03/09/2007 Page 1 of 2
The above-listed exhibits are available for review and inspection by the Plaintiff at the office

of counsel for the Defendant. This defendant respectfully reserves the right to amend this exhibit list

as needed.

Respectfully submitted this 9 day of March , 2007. th

/s/ Alex L. Holtsford, Jr. 

ALEX L. HOLTSFORD, JR. (HOL048)

JEFFREY G. HUNTER (HUN028)

Attorney’s For Defendant

OF COUNSEL:

NIX HOLTSFORD GILLILAND

HIGGINS & HITSON, P. C.

Post Office Box 4128

Montgomery, Alabama 36103-4128

(334) 215-8585

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that I have this day mailed, postage prepaid, an exact copy of the

foregoing document to:

David W. Rousseau

211 W. Adams Street

Dothan, Alabama 36303

This the 9 day of March, 2007. th

/s/ Alex L. Holtsford, Jr. 

OF COUNSEL

Case 1:06-cv-00781-MHT-TFM Document 22 Filed 03/09/2007 Page 2 of 2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the Securities and Exchange Commission Investor Advisory Committee will hold an Open Meeting on Monday, February 22, 2010, in the Multipurpose Room, L-006. The meeting will begin at 9 a.m. and will be open to the public, with seating on a first-come, first-served basis. Doors will open at 8:30 a.m. Visitors will be subject to security checks.

On February 2, 2010, the Commission published notice of the Committee meeting (Release No. 33-9104), indicating that the meeting is open to the public and inviting the public to submit written comments to the Committee. This Sunshine Act notice is being issued because a majority of the Commission may attend the meeting.

The agenda for the meeting includes consideration of a Committee recusal policy, a report from the Education Subcommittee, including a presentation on the National Financial Capability Survey, a report from the Investor as Purchaser Subcommittee, including a discussion of fiduciary duty and mandatory arbitration, a report from the Investor as Owner Subcommittee, including recommendations for the Committee on Regulation FD and proxy voting transparency, as well as reports on a work plan for environmental, social, and governance disclosure and on financial reform legislation, and discussion of next steps and closing comments.

For further information, please contact the Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

Dated: February 12, 2010.

Elizabeth M. Murphy,

Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2010-3196 Filed 2-16-10; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                   Washington, DC 20549
          
                         FORM 10-Q/A
                    AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO
                          FORM 10-Q
          
          QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15 (d)
          OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
          
                                              
For the Quarter ended December 31, 1996.

Commission File Number 0-13627.

                   CTC COMMUNICATIONS CORP.                                 
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 Massachusetts                              04-2731202
(State or other jurisdiction of         (IRS Employer    
incorporation or organization)       Identification No.)

360 Second Avenue, Waltham, Massachusetts      02154 
(Address of principal executive offices)     (Zip Code)

                      (617) 466-8080                                      
(Registrant's telephone number including area code)

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year,
if changed since last report)


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all
reports required to be filed by  section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file
such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements
for the past 90 days.      Yes    [X]       No  [ ]

      APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS:

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the Issuer's
classes of Common Stock, as of the latest practicable date:

As of February 4, 1997, 9,611,429 shares of Common Stock,
par value $.01 per share, were outstanding.

<PAGE>
<PAGE>

FORM 10Q-A FOR THE QUARTER ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996

                    SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on behalf by the 
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

                                   CTC COMMUNICATIONS CORP.


Date: February 18, 1997             /s/  ROBERT J. FABBRICATORE
                                    ----------------------------
                                         Robert J. Fabbricatore
                                         Chief Executive
                                         Officer


Date: February 18, 1997            /s/  JOHN D. PITTENGER
                                   -----------------------------
                                        John D. Pittenger
                                        Chief Financial
                                        Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1142 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
H. Res. 1142

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                     November 14, 2018.
    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider in the House the bill (H.R. 6784) to provide for removal of the gray 
wolf in the contiguous 48 States from the List of Endangered and Threatened 
Wildlife published under the Endangered Species Act of 1973. All points of order 
against consideration of the bill are waived. The bill shall be considered as 
read. All points of order against provisions in the bill are waived. The 
previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and on any 
amendment thereto to final passage without intervening motion except: (1) one 
hour of debate equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority 
member of the Committee on Natural Resources; and (2) one motion to recommit.
    Sec. 2.  On any legislative day during the period from November 19, 2018, 
through November 26, 2018--
            (a) the Journal of the proceedings of the previous day shall be 
        considered as approved; and
            (b) the Chair may at any time declare the House adjourned to meet at 
        a date and time, within the limits of clause 4, section 5, article I of 
        the Constitution, to be announced by the Chair in declaring the 
        adjournment.
    Sec. 3.  The Speaker may appoint Members to perform the duties of the Chair 
for the duration of the period addressed by section 2 of this resolution as 
though under clause 8(a) of rule I.
    Sec. 4.  The provisions of section 7 of the War Powers Resolution (50 U.S.C. 
1546) shall not apply to House Concurrent Resolution 138.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
#### In the Matter of Gerard Blasich, Appellant, v Robert Dennison, as Chair of the Board of Parole, Respondent.

[813 NYS2d 923]

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Spargo, J.), entered July 15, 2005 in Albany County, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of the Board of Parole denying petitioner’s request for parole release.

*1190Since the March 2004 determination giving rise to this CPLR article 78 proceeding, petitioner has reappeared before the Board of Parole and his request for parole release again has been denied. Given petitioner’s subsequent reappearance before the Board in March 2006, the instant appeal is now moot and must be dismissed *(see Matter of Marnell v New York State Div. of Parole,*20 AD3d 805 [2005]).

Mercure, J.P., Spain, Rose, Lahtinen and Kane, JJ., concur. Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION

DONNA DORSEY DAVIS, etc., )

)

Plaintiff, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

v. ) 2:06cv766-MHT

) 

RICHARD M. DORSEY, etc., )

and CD&O, L.L.C., etc., )

)

Defendants. )

ORDER

It is ORDERED that the motion to supplement the

record (Doc. No. 38) is granted.

DONE, this the 30th day of April, 2007.

 /s/ Myron H. Thompson 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00766-MHT-TFM Document 42 Filed 04/30/2007 Page 1 of 1
PGI 217.770 Procedures.

(a)(3)

(i) Departments and agencies shall ensure full awareness of the total costs of all fees associated with

use of a non-DoD contracting vehicle. In order to ensure full awareness, the DoD acquisition official

shall require the servicing agency to─

(A) Provide notification if its acquisition approach will use another agency’s contract vehicle; and

(B) Identify all fees (direct and indirect) associated with the assisted acquisition.

(ii) The DoD acquisition official shall document in the business decision the rationale to continue

with the assisted acquisition given the total fees (direct and indirect) involved.

Parent topic: PGI 217.7 - Interagency Acquisitions: Acquisitions by Nondefense Agencies on Behalf

of the Department of Defense
Exhibit 32.2

       CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
           OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


         In connection with the quarterly report of Simclar, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Steven T. Ker, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of the Company, hereby
certify as of the date hereof, solely for purpose of Title 18, Chapter 63,
Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my knowledge:

                  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

                  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Company.

         This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, "filed" with
the Securities and Exchange Commission.


                            /s/ Steven T. Ker
                            --------------------------------------------
                            Steven T. Ker, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
                            Simclar, Inc.
                            November 18, 2005
§ 54.9 Information collection requirements: OMB approval. ( a ) The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has submitted the information collection requirements contained in this part to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for approval as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501, *et seq.*). The NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. OMB has approved the information collection requirements contained in this part under control number 3150-0155.
( b ) The approved information requirements contained in this part appear in §§ 54.13, 54.15, 54.17, 54.19, 54.21, 54.22, 54.23, 54.33, and 54.37.
[60 FR 22491, May 8, 1995, as amended at 62 FR 52188, Oct. 6, 1997; 67 FR 67100, Nov. 4, 2002]