alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit No. 12.

Questar Pipeline Company
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges

                                                12 Months Ended
                                                September 30,
                                                    1997        1998
                                                (Dollars in Thousands)

Earnings

Income before income taxes                          $41,743     $40,549
Plus debt expense                                    13,395      14,062
Plus allowance for borrowed
   funds used during construction                       174         448
Plus interest portion of rental expense                 274         312
                                                    $55,586     $55,371

Fixed Charges

Debt expense                                        $13,395     $14,062
Plus allowance for borrowed
   funds used during construction                       174         448
Plus interest portion of rental expense                 274         312
                                                    $13,843     $14,822

Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges                     4.02        3.74
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR

THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

ANGELA PRICE, )

)

Plaintiff, )

v. ) CASE NO. 3:06-cv-742-MEF

)

ROANOKE CITY BOARD OF )

EDUCATION, )

)

Defendant. )

O R D E R

Upon consideration of Defendant’s Motion for Extension of Time to File Dispositive

Motions and Extend Deadlines (Doc. # 15) filed on July 31, 2007, it is hereby

ORDERED that the motion is DENIED.

DONE this the 2 day of August, 2007. nd

 /s/ Mark E. Fuller 

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-00742-MEF-WC Document 16 Filed 08/02/2007 Page 1 of 1
Editorial Note on Part 2
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

§ 2.3 Resolution of conflict. ( a ) In any conflict between a general rule in subpart C of this part and a special rule in another subpart or other part of this chapter applicable to a particular type of proceeding, the special rule governs.
( b ) Unless otherwise specifically referenced, the procedures in this part do not apply to hearings in 10 CFR parts 4, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 15, 16, and subparts H and I of 10 CFR part 110.
[69 FR 2233, Jan. 14, 2004]
## F I F T H 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________ Case No. 5D 2 2

- 2276 LT Case No. 2020

- CF

- 005034

- A

- X

_____________________________
R ODRIQUEZE R ODERICK W RIGHT , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Marion County

. Lisa D. Herndon , Judge

. Matthew J. Metz, Public Defender, and Ali L. Hansen, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach , for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Alyssa M. Williams, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach , for Appellee.

January 30, 2024

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
S OUD , B OATWRIGHT , and P RATT , JJ., concur

.2 _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3366 

To suspend temporarily the duty on mixtures of tralkoxydim. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 5, 2006 

Mr. NELSON of Nebraska introduced the following bill; which was read twice 

and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on mixtures of tralkoxydim. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. MIXTURES OF TRALKOXYDIM. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.12.61 Mixtures of 2-[1- 

(ethoxyimino)propyl]-3-hydroxy-5-(2,4,6- 

trimethylphenyl)–2-cyclohexen-1-one (Tralkoxydim) 

(CAS No. 87820–88–0) as 

the active ingredient and application adjuvants (provided 

for in subheading 

3808.30.15) ......................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 


cchase on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
2 

•S 3366 IS 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


cchase on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
###### Editorial Note on Part 2

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

#### § 2.316 Consolidation of parties.

On motion or on its own initiative, the Commission or the presiding officer may order any parties in a proceeding who have substantially the same interest that may be affected by the proceeding and who raise substantially the same questions, to consolidate their presentation of evidence, cross-examination, briefs, proposed findings of fact, and conclusions of law and argument. However, it may not order any consolidation that would prejudice the rights of any party. A consolidation under this section may be for all purposes of the proceeding, all of the issues of the proceeding, or with respect to any one or more issues thereof.

[88 FR 57876, Aug. 24, 2023]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                            9
<CIK>                         0000764402
<NAME>                        Greene County Bancshares, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         20,262
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               29,465
<TRADING-ASSETS>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    25,528
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         3,430
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           3,430
<LOANS>                                        498,647
<ALLOWANCE>                                    10,417
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 597,006
<DEPOSITS>                                     506,066
<SHORT-TERM>                                   5,308
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            10,302
<LONG-TERM>                                    16,462
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       13,586
<OTHER-SE>                                     45,282
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 597,006
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                25,819
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              758
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               661
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               27,238
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             9,293
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             9,682
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          17,556
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  1,550
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                11,430
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                7,600
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     7,600
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   4,943
<EPS-BASIC>                                  3.64
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  3.61
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                 6.42
<LOANS-NON>                                    3,585
<LOANS-PAST>                                   1,281
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                               0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                10,380
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               10,253
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  1,874
<RECOVERIES>                                   488
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              10,417
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           10,417
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                            0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        0


</TABLE>
3032.1110 Solicitation provision and contract clauses.       (a)          (1)  			Contracting officer shall insert FAR 48 CFR 52.232–33, Payment by Electronic Funds Transfer—Central Contractor Registration, in all proposed solicitations and contracts.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 3032.11—Electronic Funds Transfer
# PGI SUBPART 23.90 – ENSURING ADEQUATE COVID-19 SAFETY PROTOCOLS FOR FEDERAL CONTRACTORS 

**Parent topic:**PGI PART 23 – ENVIRONMENT, ENERGY AND WATER EFFICIENCY, RENEWABLE ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES, OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY, AND DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE

## PGI 23.9001 General.

(c) See Vaccination Deviation Flow Chart (https://dlamil.dps.mil/sites/Acquisition/Shared%20Documents/J-72/Vaccination%20Deviation%20Flow%20Chart_Updated_29OCT2021.pdf) on the Acquisition SharePoint Page. The flow chart includes Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v.

JOSE LUIS ALVARADO

- MANRIQUEZ,

Defendant

- Appellant. No. 17

- 50010

D.C. No. 3:16

- cr

- 02173

- BEN

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of California

Roger T. Benitez, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 26, 2017 **

Before: SILVERMAN, TALLMAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Jose Luis Alvarado

- Manriquez appeals from the district court’s judgment

and challenges the 24

- month sentence imposed following his guilty

- plea

conviction for improper entry by an alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1325.

Pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Alvarado

- Manriquez’s

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

SEP 29 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 17

- 50010

counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a

motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Alvarado

- Manriquez

the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or

answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S.

75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

AFFIRMED

.
THIS ORDER IS

HEREBY STRICKEN

FROM THE CASE AS A

DOCKETING ERROR. 

PLEASE DISREGARD

THIS ENTRY FROM

THE DOCKET.

Case 2:06-cv-00736-WKW-SRW Document 30-2 Filed 10/03/2007 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

I, Brian F. Lavin, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

To the best of my knowledge and belief, the quarterly report on Form 10-Q filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on August 14, 2003, by NTS-Properties VI, a Maryland
Limited Partnership (the "Periodic Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of NTS-Properties
VI, a Maryland Limited Partnership.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
NTS-Properties VI, a Maryland Limited Partnership and will be retained by NTS-Properties VI, a
Maryland Limited Partnership and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.

/s/ Brian F. Lavin
President of NTS Capital Corporation,
General Partner of NTS-Properties Associates VI,
General Partner of NTS-Properties VI, a Maryland Limited Partnership
1001.670 Contract clause.       Contracting Officers must insert a clause substantially similar to the clause in section 1052.201-70, Contracting Officer's Representative (COR) Appointment and Authority, in all solicitations and contracts. Exceptions to the requirement for inclusion of the COR clause and the appointment of a COR may be made at the discretion of the BCPO.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 1001.6 - Career Development, Contracting Authority and Responsibilities
EXHIBIT 32

      Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
            pursuant to 8 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to
                 Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.


                                  CERTIFICATION

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Water Chef, Inc., a Delaware
corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2005
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350 as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge and upon a review
of the Report that:

(1) the Report of the Company filed today pursuant to Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

This certification is based upon, among other things, my responsibilities as
Chief Executive Officer, my own due diligence and representations made by
certain members of the Company's senior management.





Dated: 5/20/05


                                            /s/  David A. Conway
                                            ----------------------------------
                                                 David A. Conway
                                                 President,
                                                 Chief Executive Officer and
                                                 Chief Financial Officer
#### In the Matter of Thomas J. Valentine, Respondent, v. Margaret Amori et al., Respondents, and Louis A. Barone, Appellant.

In a proceeding to invalidate petitions designating appellant and respondent Amori as candidates in the Republican Party Primary Election to be held on June 17, 1969 for the Party position of member of the Westchester Republican County Committee from the 8th Election District of the 4th Ward of the City of New Rochelle, the appeal is from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered June 10, 1969, which *inter alia*invalidated appellant’s designating petitions. Order affirmed insofar as it invalidated appellant’s designating petitions, without costs. No opinion. Beldock, P. J., Christ, Rabin, Benjamin and Munder, JJ., concur.
Case 3:06-cv-00744-SRW Document 3 Filed 08/29/2006 Page 1 of 2
Case 3:06-cv-00744-SRW Document 3 Filed 08/29/2006 Page 2 of 2
PGI 208.406-1 Order placement.       (1) When ordering from schedules, ordering offices—          (i) May use DD Form 1155, Order for Supplies or Services, to place orders for—          (A) Commercial products or commercial services at or below the simplified acquisition threshold; and          (B) Other than commercial products or commercial services at any dollar value (see PGI 213.307 );          (ii) Shall use SF 1449, Solicitation/Contract/Order for Commercial Products and Commercial Services, to place orders for commercial products or commercial services exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold (see FAR 12.204); and          (iii) May use SF 1449 to place orders for other than commercial products or commercial services at any dollar value.          (2) Schedule orders may be placed orally if—          (i) The contractor agrees to furnish a delivery ticket for each shipment under the order (in the number of copies required by the ordering office). The ticket must include the—          (A) Contract number;          (B) Order number under the contract;          (C) Date of order;          (D) Name and title of person placing the order;          (E) Itemized listing of supplies or services furnished; and          (F) Date of delivery or shipment; and          (ii) Invoicing procedures are agreed upon. Optional methods of submitting invoices for payment are permitted, such as—          (A) An individual invoice with a receipted copy of the delivery ticket;          (B) A summarized monthly invoice covering all oral orders made during the month, with receipted copies of the delivery tickets (this option is preferred if there are many oral orders); or          (C) A contracting officer statement that the Government has received the supplies.          (3) For purchases where cash payment is an advantage, the use of imprest funds in accordance with DFARS 213.305 is authorized when—          (i) The order does not exceed the threshold at FAR 13.305-3(a); and          (ii) The contractor agrees to the procedure.          (4) If permitted under the schedule contract, use of the Governmentwide commercial purchase card—          (i) Is mandatory for placement of orders valued at or below the micro-purchase threshold; and          (ii) Is optional for placement of orders valued above the micro-purchase threshold.    **Parent topic:** PGI 208.406 Ordering activity responsibilities.
PGI 225.873-2 Procedures.       (1) The Government of the U.K. shall approve waiver of U.K. levies. When an offeror or contractor identifies a levy included in an offered or contract price, the contracting officer shall provide written notification to the Defense Security Cooperation Agency, ATTN: PSD-PMD, 1111 Jefferson Davis Highway, Arlington, VA 22202-4306, telephone (703) 601-3864. The Defense Security Cooperation Agency will request a waiver of the levy from the Government of the U.K. The notification shall include—          (i) Name of the U.K. firm;          (ii) Prime contract number;          (iii) Description of item for which waiver is being sought;          (iv) Quantity being acquired; and          (v) Amount of levy.          (2) Waiver may occur after contract award. If levies are waived before contract award, evaluate the offer without the levy. If levies are identified but not waived before contract award, evaluate the offer inclusive of the levies.    **Parent topic:** PGI 225.873 Waiver of United Kingdom commercial exploitation levies.
NO T R EC OM M EN DE D F OR P UB LIC AT ION File Na me: 09a0316n.06 Filed: May

4, 2009 No. 07-4420 UN ITED STA TES C OU RT OF AP P EA LS F OR THE SI XT H C IR CU IT
UNITED STAT ES O F AMERICA, P laintif f-App ellee,
v. STEV EN G . C AM P BELL, Defendan t-Appellant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ON AP P EAL FROM THE U NI TED STATES DI STRI CT COURT FOR THE N O R T H E R

N D IS T R IC T O F O H IO

BEFORE: MERRITT, COOK, and WHIT E, Circuit Judges MERRITT, Circuit Judge. I n this direc t criminal appeal, t he defenda nt has alre ady

serve d a short sente nce f

or beinga fe lon in possession of a firea rm and wa s actua lly

rele ased f

rom custody on Fe bruar

y 14, 2008. He then f

iled a brie f nine months later on November 7, 2008, and re quested
or a l argume nt on a c la im that the Di str ic t Court e rr e d in fa ili ngto a llo w h im t o w ith dr a w h is guil ty plea; and f

inally , without notice to the court, his counse l fa i led to appea r at his re quested ora l
argume nt o n th e a

pp oin te d o ra l argume nt d a te of Ap ri l 28 , 2 00 9. Th e de fe nd a nt’ s c la im i s b oth fr ivo lou s and inc oh e re nt. He do e s not ac tua lly c la im he is not g uil ty . B ut he se e ks to se t a sid e his g uil ty ple a wh ic h w ou ld r e su lt i n a

tr ia l in thi s c ri min a l c a se in w hic h h e ha s already se rv e d h is
se nte nc e of

c on fi ne me nt.No. 07-4420

Un ite d S tat es v . Ca mp be ll

-2- Acc ording ly , upon an independent review of the ca se and f inding no e rror

in the proce eding or ruling s in the District Court, and concluding that no substantial issue is presented on a ppeal, we
a ff ir m th e jud g me nt o f t

he Di str ic t Co ur

t.
Exhibit 10.40


 


EXHIBIT F


 


FIRST AMENDMENT


TO


THE ST. PAUL TRAVELERS COMPANIES, INC.


SENIOR EXECUTIVE PERFORMANCE PLAN


 


The St. Paul Travelers Companies, Inc. Senior Executive
Performance Plan is hereby amended effective January 1, 2009 as follows:


 


I.


 


The name of the Plan shall be amended to be “The Travelers Companies, Inc.
Senior Executive Performance Plan” and each reference in the Plan to the name
of the Plan shall be amended to read accordingly.


 


II.


 


Each reference in the Plan to the name of the Company as “The St. Paul
Travelers Companies, Inc.” shall be amended to read “The Travelers
Companies, Inc.”


 


III.


 


The
definition of “Stock Plans” is amended to read as follows:


 


“STOCK PLANS” shall mean The Travelers Companies, Inc.
Amended and Restated 2004 Stock Incentive Plan and/or any prior and successor
stock plans adopted or assumed by the Company.