alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
120 STAT. 1774 PUBLIC LAW 109–334—OCT. 12, 2006

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 6033:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 152 (2006):

Sept. 13, 14, considered and passed House.

Sept. 29, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 109–334

109th Congress

An Act

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 39–25

61st Street in Woodside, New York, as the ‘‘Thomas J. Manton Post Office Building’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. THOMAS J. MANTON POST OFFICE BUILDING.

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal

Service located at 39–25 61st Street in Woodside, New York, shall

be known and designated as the ‘‘Thomas J. Manton Post Office

Building’’.

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation,

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference

to the ‘‘Thomas J. Manton Post Office Building’’.

Approved October 12, 2006.

Oct. 12, 2006

[H.R. 6033]
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5

       

<S>                                <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                      9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                     JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                       SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                               1,720,431
<SECURITIES>                                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                        5,685,641<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                 0
<INVENTORY>                          8,535,631<F2>
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                    17,166,745
<PP&E>                               8,771,578
<DEPRECIATION>                       3,727,656
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                      25,000,577
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                6,722,459
<BONDS>                              4,650,434
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        0
<PREFERRED>                                  0
<COMMON>                                52,501
<OTHER-SE>                           9,903,516
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>        25,000,577
<SALES>                             34,458,947
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                    34,677,125
<CGS>                               29,829,518
<TOTAL-COSTS>                       29,829,518
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                     3,046,513
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                     490,435
<INCOME-PRETAX>                      1,310,659
<INCOME-TAX>                            76,607
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                  1,234,052
<DISCONTINUED>                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              0
<CHANGES>                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                         1,234,052
<EPS-PRIMARY>                              .24
<EPS-DILUTED>                              .19

<FN>
<F1>Accounts receivable are net of allowance of $55,000 at September 
    30, 1998.
<F2>Inventories are net of reserve of $477,000 at September 30, 1998.
</FN>
        


</TABLE>
H. Res. 265

In the House of Representatives, U.S., 

June 6, 2006.

Whereas osteoporosis, a disease characterized by low bone 

mass, structural deterioration of bone, and increased susceptibility to fractures, is a public health threat for an estimated 44 million Americans; 

Whereas in the United States, 10 million individuals already 

have the disease and almost 34 million more are estimated to have low bone mass, placing them at increased 

risk for osteoporosis; 

Whereas one in two women and one in four men over age 50 

will have an osteoporosis-related fracture in her or his remaining lifetime; 

Whereas building strong bones during childhood and adolescence can be the best defense against developing 

osteoporosis later; 

Whereas osteoporosis is often thought of as an older person’s 

disease, but bone health is a concern for any age; 

Whereas substantial risk has been reported in people of all 

ethnic backgrounds; 

Whereas osteoporosis is responsible for more than 1.5 million 

fractures annually; 
2

•HRES 265 EH 

Whereas the Surgeon General of the Public Health Service 

says that caring for bone fractures from osteoporosis 

costs America $18 billion annually; 

Whereas the Surgeon General believes that bone health is 

critically important to the overall health and quality of 

the life of Americans; that it is in jeopardy and will only 

get worse if left unchecked; and that great improvements 

in the bone health status of Americans can be made by 

applying what is already known about early prevention, 

assessment, diagnosis, and treatment; 

Whereas optimum bone health and prevention of osteoporosis 

can be maximized by a balanced diet rich in calcium and 

vitamin D; weight-bearing exercise; and a healthy lifestyle 

with no smoking or excessive alcohol intake; and 

Whereas May 2006 would be an appropriate month to observe National Osteoporosis Awareness and Prevention 

Month: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved, That the House of Representatives supports 

the goals and ideals of National Osteoporosis Awareness and 

Prevention Month and urges the people of the United States 

to observe appropriate programs and activities with respect to 

osteoporosis, including talking with their health care professionals about their bone health.

Attest: 

Clerk.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

CALVIN FLUKER, RICARDO )

WRIGHT, BERYL JACKSON, )

TRACEY MARTIN, LISA )

PITCHFORD, KIMBERLY LOVE, )

)

Plaintiffs, )

)

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO.:

) 2:06cv785-MHT

U.S. FOODSERVICE, INC. and )

U.S. FOODSERVICE, INC. - )

MONTGOMERY DIVISION, )

)

Defendants. )

NOTICE OF CHANGE OF ADDRESS

Please be advised that Tammy L. Baker has joined the firm of Jackson Lewis

LLP. Please forward copies of all pleadings, correspondence, etc. to Ms. Baker at the

address listed below.

Case 2:06-cv-00785-MHT-WC Document 30 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 1 of 2
2

Respectfully submitted,

s/ Tammy L. Baker

Tammy L. Baker (ASB-9522-B62T)

E-Mail: BakerT@jacksonlewis.com

JACKSON LEWIS LLP

2001Park Place North

Suite 650

Birmingham, Alabama 35203

Phone: (866) 919-6075

COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

This is to certify that on May 24, 2007, the undersigned electronically filed the

foregoing with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system that will send

notification of such filing to the following:

Jon C. Goldfarb, Esq.

Maury S. Weiner, Esq.

Ethan R. Dettling, Esq.

Wiggins, Childs, Quinn & Pantazis, LLC

301 19

th

Street North

Birmingham, AL 35203

/s/ Tammy L. Baker

Counsel of Record

Case 2:06-cv-00785-MHT-WC Document 30 Filed 05/24/2007 Page 2 of 2
#### William Millas, Appellee, v. Gulf Insurance Company of Dallas, Texas, Appellant.

opinion filed June 14, 1940.

Taylor, Chasnoff & Willson, J. H. Cunningham, Jr. and Warnock, Williamson & Burroughs, for appellant; Jesse R. Brown and Perry H. Hiles, for appellee.

Opinion by

Presiding Justice Stone.

‘ ‘Not to be published in full.’ ’
``+F~i 

RI-i0DE ISLAND 

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 

235 Promenade Street, Providence, RI 02908-57b7 TDD 401-222-44G2 

25 March 2011 

David Conroy 

EPA Region I 

5 Post Office Square - Suite 100 

Boston, MA 02109-3912 

Dear Mr. Conroy: 

The Office of Air Resources (OAR) is hereby submitting amendments to the Rhode Island Air 

Pollution Control General Definitions Regulation as a formal revision to the Rhode Island State 

Implementation Plan (SIP). 

The revisions amend the Rhode Island definition of the term "Volatile Organic Compound" or 

"VOC" to make that definition consistent with the Federal definition for that term . Specifically, 

the amendments add two compounds, propylene carbonate and dimethyl carbonate, to the list of 

substances that are excluded from the VOC definition because they are "negligibly reactive" and, 

therefore, contribute little or nothing to the formation of ground level ozone. 

The term "organic compounds," which is used in the VOC definition, previously was not defined 

in the Rhode Island regulation . In order to avoid any confusion and to be consistent with the 

Federal VOC definition, the proposed amendments add a clarifying definition of "organic 

compound" to the General Definitions Regulation which specifies that organic compounds are 

"carbon-containing compound(s) with the exception of carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, 

carbonic acid, metallic carbides, metallic carbonates and ammonium carbonate," substances that 

contain carbon but not hydrogen. 

A public notice announcing a comment period on the proposed adoption of the amended 

regulation was posted on the Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management and the 

Rhode Island Office of Secretary of State websites and was mailed to interested parties on 21 

July 2010. The notice stated that a public hearing would be held if requested by one or more 

people, a governmental agency or subdivisions, or an association. No such request was received. 

The public comment period extended until 4:00 PM on 23 August 2010. 

,, 30% post-consumer fiber 
The following support documents are included in this submittal package: 

1 . A copy of the Notice of Public Comment Period, Mailing List, and Affidavit of 

Publication/Posting of the Notice with the Rhode Island Office of the Secretary of State 

Database of Proposed Rules and Regulations; 

2 . A copy of the hearing officer's Decision ; and 

3 . A copy of the final amended regulation, which was adopted as proposed. 

If you have any questions about this submittal, please contact me at (401) 222-2808 ext. 7012. 

Very truly yours, 

Barbara Morin, Supervising Environmental Scientist 

Office of Air Resources
2024 NY Slip Op 30586(U)

Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip

Op 30001(U), are republished from various New York

State and local government sources, including the New

York State Unified Court System's eCourts Service.

This opinion is uncorrected and not selected for official

publication.

Opinion withdrawn from publication by 

the State Reporter.
Exhibit 35.1

 

ANNUAL SERVICER’S COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE

 

This ComplianceCertificate is furnished pursuant to Section 4.10 of the Sale and Servicing Agreement (the “Agreement”), dated asof January 30, 2013, by and among Hyundai Auto Receivables Trust 2013-A, Hyundai Capital America, as seller and servicer (the“Servicer”), Hyundai ABS Funding Corporation, as depositor, and U.S. Bank National Association, as indenturetrustee and Item 1123 of Regulation AB. The undersigned hereby certifies that:

 

1)        Iam a duly authorized officer of the Servicer.

 

2)        Areview of the activities of the Servicer from January 30, 2013 through December 31, 2013 (the “Relevant Period”)and of the Servicer’s performance under the Agreement during the Relevant Period has been made under my supervision.

 

3)        Basedon such review, the Servicer has, to the best of my knowledge, fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all materialrespects throughout the Relevant Period.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have duly executed thisCompliance Certificate this 28th day of March, 2014.
**Exhibit 32.2**

**Certification of Chief financial Officer Under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

The undersigned officer of First National Lincoln Corporation (the "Company") hereby certifies that the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005 to which this certification is being furnished as an exhibit (the "Report"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. This certification is provided pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K ("Item 601(b)(32)") promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"), and the Exchange Act. In accordance with clause (ii) of Item 601(b)(32), thiscertification (A) shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and (B) shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.

 

Date: August 9, 2005

 

/s/ F. Stephen Ward

F. Stephen Ward

Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer

First National Lincoln Corporation

 

 

Page 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR

THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

GRADY CLIFFORD SMITH, )

)

Plaintiff, )

v. ) CASE NO. 2:06-cv-745-WKW

)

HYUNDAI MOTOR MANUFACTURING )

ALABAMA, LLC, )

)

Defendant. )

RULE 26(f) ORDER

The parties are hereby reminded of the obligation, imposed by Rule 26(f) of the Federal

Rules of Civil Procedure, to confer and to develop a proposed discovery plan. The Rule 26(f)

report containing the discovery plan shall be filed as soon as practicable but not later than

October 4, 2006.

The longstanding practice in this district is that dispositive motions shall be filed no later

than 90 days prior to the pretrial date. If the parties seek to vary from that schedule, they should

present, in the plan, specific case related reasons for the requested variance.

This case will be set for trial before the undersigned judge during one of that judge's

regularly scheduled civil trial terms. The pretrial date is normally set within four to six weeks of

a scheduled trial term. The dates of each judge's civil trial terms are available on the court's

website located at http://almd.uscourts.gov in the civil case information section.

This court may or may not hold a scheduling conference before issuing a scheduling

order. If the court holds a scheduling conference, counsel may participate in the scheduling

conference by conference call.

The scheduling order entered by the court will follow the form of the Uniform Scheduling

Case 2:06-cv-00745-WKW-CSC Document 5 Filed 09/14/2006 Page 1 of 2
Order adopted by the judges of this court. The Uniform Scheduling Order is also available on the

court's website.

The report of the parties should comply with Form 35 of the Appendix of Forms to the

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

DONE this 14th day of September, 2006.

 /s/ W. Keith Watkins 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00745-WKW-CSC Document 5 Filed 09/14/2006 Page 2 of 2
#### KNOCHE, Appellant, v. BOHEMIAN AMERICAN WORKINGMEN'S GYMNASTIC ASS'N (SOKOL), Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

June 12, 1914.)

Action by Godfrey Knoche against the Bohemian American Workingmen's Gymnastic Association (Sokol).

J. P. Donnellon, for appellant.

M. Suizberger, of New York City, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Order filed.

LAUGHLIN, J., dissents.
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


The undersigned  hereby certify  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  that the quarterly
report of United States Basketball League, Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly
period ended August 31, 2004 fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 and that the  information
contained  in such  quarterly  report  on Form  10-QSB  fairly  presents  in all
material  respects the  financial  condition  and results of operation of United
States Basketball League, Inc.

Date: October 20, 2004


/s/ Daniel T. Meisenheimer, III
-------------------------------
Daniel T. Meisenheimer, III
President

Date: October 20, 2004


/s/ Richard C. Meisenheimer
---------------------------
Richard C. Meisenheimer
Chief Financial Officer
MISCELLANEOUS DISMISSALS

2007-1929.

#### Banez v. Banez.

Stark App. No. 2006CA00216, 2007-Ohio-4584. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal. It appears from the records of the court that Leticia V. Banez has not filed a memorandum in response and in support of her cross-appeal, due November 19, 2007, in compliance with the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court and therefore has failed to prosecute this cause with the requisite diligence. Upon consideration thereof,

It is ordered by the court that the cross-appeal is dismissed sua sponte. The appeal of Ramon V. Banez remains pending.
IV 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 15 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the United States 

Postal Service should take all appropriate measures to ensure the continuation of its 6-day mail delivery service. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 3, 2017 

Mr. GRAVES of Missouri (for himself and Mr. CONNOLLY) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and 

Government Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that 

the United States Postal Service should take all appropriate measures to ensure the continuation of its 6- 

day mail delivery service. 

Whereas the United States Postal Service has announced 

that it may need to reduce the frequency of its mail delivery service from 6 days a week to 5 days a week; 

Whereas 6-day mail delivery service is an essential service 

that the American people have relied on since 1912, particularly working families that depend on the Postal Service for the timely delivery of their paychecks; and 

Whereas reducing mail delivery service to 5 days a week 

would inevitably cause not only delays in the delivery of 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 15 IH 

mail, but higher postal costs, due to the many hours of 

additional overtime that the Postal Service would require 

in order to handle the resulting back-up of mail: Now, 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that the United States Postal Service should 

3 take all appropriate measures to ensure the continuation 

4 of its 6-day mail delivery service. 

Æ 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
Case 2:06-cv-00785-MHT-WC Document 4 Filed 09/08/2006 Page 1 of 1
939 A.2d 116

#### ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND, Petitioner v. Alfred Amos PAGE, Jr., Respondent.

Misc. Docket AG No. 37

Sept. Term, 2007.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Jan. 7, 2008.

ORDER

Upon consideration of the Joint Petition for a Suspension of Respondent, by consent, for thirty days filed herein pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-772, it is this 7th day of January, 2008,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that Alfred A. Page, Jr., be, and is hereby, suspended for a period of thirty (30) days from the further practice of law in the State of Maryland, effective immediately; and it is further,

ORDERED, that the Clerk of this Court shall strike the name of Alfred A. Page, Jr. from the register of attorneys, and pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-772(d) shall certify that fact to the Trustees of the Client Protection Fund and the Clerks of all judicial tribunals in this State.
PGI 250.103-6 Disposition.       (1) When the request for relief is denied or approved below the Secretarial level, submit the following documents to the appropriate office within 30 days after the close of the month in which the decision is executed:          (i) Two copies of the memorandum of decision.          (ii) Except for the Army, one copy of the contractual document implementing any decision approving contractual action.          (iii) One copy of a final record, as described at PGI                 250.101-3             .          (2) When a contract adjustment board decision is implemented, the activity that forwarded the case to the board shall prepare and submit to the board the documents identified in paragraphs (1)(ii) and (iii) of this section.    **Parent topic:** PGI 250.103 Contract adjustments.
PGI 242.302 Contract administration functions.       (a)(13)(B)*(1)*  For contracts assigned to DCMA for contract administration, designate as the payment office—          (*i*) The cognizant Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) payment office as specified in the Federal Directory of Contract Administration Services Components, available at https://piee.eb.mil/pcm/xhtml/unauth/index.xhtml, for contracts funded with DoD funds;                    *(ii)* The department or agency payment office, if authorized by defense financial management regulations or if the contract is funded with non-DoD funds; or          *(iii)* Multiple payment offices under paragraphs (a)(13)(B)*(1)(i)* and *(ii)* of this section, if the contract is funded with both DoD and non-DoD funds.          *(2)* For contracts not assigned to DCMA, select a payment office or offices under department/agency procedures.          (*3*) When the Governmentwide commercial purchase card is the method of payment for a contract or order, enter “CRCARD” in the payment office code block.          (56) Assignment of a Government flight representative (GFR) may require execution of a secondary contract administration delegation, which is used to transfer contract administration responsibilities (see FAR 42.302(a)) from one contract administration office to another office or command. Secondary contract administration delegations are appropriate when, for example, contract work is performed at locations geographically separated from the contract administration office. In lieu of transferring contract administration responsibility through a secondary contract administration delegation, a GFR from one unit may be delegated GFR responsibility from an outside contract administration organization that has retained contract administration responsibility. This is accomplished through the use of a formal letter of agreement functionally assigning the GFR to the outside contract administration organization for the limited purpose of performing contract administration under FAR 42.302(a)(56).    **PGI 242.302 (a)(S-72) —Surveillance of the contractors implementation of the Synchronized Predeployment and Operational Tracker (SPOT)****PGI 242.302 (a)(S-75) —Monitoring contractor costs****Parent topic:** PGI 242.3 -CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION OFFICE FUNCTIONS