alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[109th Congress Public Law 409]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ409.109]

[[Page 120 STAT. 2761]]

Public Law 109-409
109th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
  216 Oak Street in Farmington, Minnesota, as the ``Hamilton H. Judson 
         Post Office''. <<NOTE: Dec. 18, 2006 -  [H.R. 6151]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. HAMILTON H. JUDSON POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 216 Oak Street in Farmington, Minnesota, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Hamilton H. Judson Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Hamilton H. 
Judson Post Office''.

    Approved December 18, 2006.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 6151:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 152 (2006):
            Sept. 28, considered and passed House.
            Dec. 6, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Intervoice, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-Q for the period ended August 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David W.
Brandenburg, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

    1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.




Date: October 15, 2002
                                       /s/ David W. Brandenburg
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       David W. Brandenburg
                                       Chief Executive Officer and Chairman
Editorial Note on Part 35
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 35 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

§ 35.49 Suppliers for sealed sources or devices for medical use. For medical use, a licensee may only use— ( a ) Sealed sources or devices manufactured, labeled, packaged, and distributed in accordance with a license issued under 10 CFR Part 30 and 10 CFR 32.74 of this chapter or equivalent requirements of an Agreement State;
( b ) Sealed sources or devices non-commercially transferred from a Part 35 licensee or an Agreement State medical use licensee.
( c ) Teletherapy sources manufactured and distributed in accordance with a license issued under 10 CFR Part 30 or the equivalent requirements of an Agreement State.
[67 FR 20370, Apr. 24, 2002, as amended at 71 FR 15008, Mar. 27, 2006]
1206.501 Requirement.

The DOT Agency Advocate for Competition is the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Administration.

Parent topic: Subpart 1206.5—Advocates for Competition
# Subpart 1307.1 - Acquisition Plans

**Parent topic:**PART 1307 - ACQUISITION PLANNING

## 1307.102 Policy.

In accordance with FAR 7.102, it is the Department's policy to perform acquisition planning and conduct market research in order to promote the acquisition of commercial items and provide for full and open competition.   

## 1307.103 Agency-head responsibilities.

The designee authorized as responsible for compliance with FAR 7.103 is set forth in CAM 1301.70.   

## 1307.105 Contents of written acquisition plans.

Information on the contents of Acquisition Plans is set forth in CAM 1307.1
1207.305 Solicitation provisions and contract

clause.

The contracting officer may insert clause 1252.237–73, Key Personnel, in solicitations and contracts

when the acquisition is conducted pursuant to OMB Circular A–76 and meets the clause prescription

requirements at 1237.110–70(b).

Parent topic: Subpart 1207.3—Contractor Versus Government Performance
Exhibit 32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  In connection with the amended Annual Report of Buckingham Exploration Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A for the year ended May 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:
 
 1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 Dated: September 16, 2010
  /s/Christopher Robin Relph
 Christopher Robin Relph
 Chief Executive Officer and
 Chief Financial Officer
#### In the Matter of Charles J. Walker et al., Individually and as Taxpayers of the Olean City School District and as Members of Save Hillside School Committee, Respondents, v Board of Education of the Olean City School *983District, Appellant.

Order unanimously reversed, without costs, and petition dismissed, without prejudice to any administrative action deemed advisable. Memorandum: Respondent appeals from an order denying its motion to dismiss petitioners’ CPLR article 78 petition challenging its decision to close Hillside Elementary School and to reassign the students to other schools in the district. Respondent contends that review of the school closing decision is within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Commissioner of Education and is not initially reviewable in a CPLR article 78 proceeding (Education Law, § 310). The general rule is that an appeal to the commissioner is the exclusive remedy where the issue involves “the professional judgment and discretion of those responsible for the administration of public schools” *(Matter of Bokhair v Board of Educ.,*43 NY2d 855, 856, citing *James v Board of Educ.,*42 NY2d 357; accord *Hoffman v Board of Educ.,*49 NY2d 121; *Donohue v Copiague Union Free School Dist.,*47 NY2d 440). Where, however, a statutory or constitutional provision is the basis of the dispute or where discrete issues of law are present which do not involve matters of policy, review of a school board’s decision by the courts is proper (see *James v Board of Educ., supra,*pp 365-366). Petitioners seek to review a discretionary decision involving the exercise of professional judgment in a school matter which does not raise a constitutional or statutory issue or a discrete question of law, i.e., whether an elementary school should be closed in the light of various considerations such as finances and safety. Petitioners’ exclusive remedy is an appeal under section 310 of the Education Law. (Appeal from order of Erie Supreme Court — art 78.) Present—Simons, J. P., Hancock, Jr., Schnepp, Doerr and Witmer, JJ.
Case 2:06-cv-00755-MHT-CSC     Document 20      Filed 03/05/2007     Page 1 of 12

Case 2:06-cv-00755-MHT-CSC     Document 20      Filed 03/05/2007     Page 2 of 12

Case 2:06-cv-00755-MHT-CSC     Document 20      Filed 03/05/2007     Page 3 of 12

Case 2:06-cv-00755-MHT-CSC     Document 20      Filed 03/05/2007     Page 4 of 12

Case 2:06-cv-00755-MHT-CSC     Document 20      Filed 03/05/2007     Page 5 of 12

Case 2:06-cv-00755-MHT-CSC     Document 20      Filed 03/05/2007     Page 6 of 12

Case 2:06-cv-00755-MHT-CSC     Document 20      Filed 03/05/2007     Page 7 of 12

Case 2:06-cv-00755-MHT-CSC     Document 20      Filed 03/05/2007     Page 8 of 12

Case 2:06-cv-00755-MHT-CSC     Document 20      Filed 03/05/2007     Page 9 of 12

Case 2:06-cv-00755-MHT-CSC     Document 20      Filed 03/05/2007     Page 10 of 12

Case 2:06-cv-00755-MHT-CSC     Document 20      Filed 03/05/2007     Page 11 of 12

Case 2:06-cv-00755-MHT-CSC     Document 20      Filed 03/05/2007     Page 12 of 12

Case 2:06-cv-00755-MHT-CSC     Document 20-2      Filed 03/05/2007     Page 1 of 10

Case 2:06-cv-00755-MHT-CSC     Document 20-2      Filed 03/05/2007     Page 2 of 10

Case 2:06-cv-00755-MHT-CSC     Document 20-2      Filed 03/05/2007     Page 3 of 10

Case 2:06-cv-00755-MHT-CSC     Document 20-2      Filed 03/05/2007     Page 4 of 10

Case 2:06-cv-00755-MHT-CSC     Document 20-2      Filed 03/05/2007     Page 5 of 10

Case 2:06-cv-00755-MHT-CSC     Document 20-2      Filed 03/05/2007     Page 6 of 10

Case 2:06-cv-00755-MHT-CSC     Document 20-2      Filed 03/05/2007     Page 7 of 10

Case 2:06-cv-00755-MHT-CSC     Document 20-2      Filed 03/05/2007     Page 8 of 10

Case 2:06-cv-00755-MHT-CSC     Document 20-2      Filed 03/05/2007     Page 9 of 10

Case 2:06-cv-00755-MHT-CSC     Document 20-2      Filed 03/05/2007     Page 10 of 10

Case 2:06-cv-00755-MHT-CSC     Document 20-3      Filed 03/05/2007     Page 1 of 2

Case 2:06-cv-00755-MHT-CSC     Document 20-3      Filed 03/05/2007     Page 2 of 2
162 So.2d 573

#### Robert J. CAIRE, curator for Dorothy Ebeling Sullivan, v. Walter A. SULLIVAN and Mrs. Jane Porter Jackson.

No. 47195.

April 17, 1964.

In re: Walter E. Sullivan et al. applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of St. Tammany. 162 So.2d 49.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal there appears n.o error of law in its judgment.
$/$6.$16($)22'

&%,5(3/$&(0(173$*(

(3$+42:

'&1B&%,

7+()2//2:,1*+$6%((15(029('%(&$86(,7

&217$,16&21),'(17,$/%86,1(66,1)250$7,21

&%,3(5&)53$5768%3$57%
#### § 21.41 Inspections.

Each individual, corporation, partnership, dedicating entity, or other entity subject to the regulations in this part shall permit the Commission to inspect records, premises, activities, and basic components as necessary to accomplish the purposes of this part.

[60 FR 48374, Sept. 19, 1995]
###### Editorial Note on Part 26

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 26 appear at 87 FR 71455, Nov. 22, 2022.

#### § 26.123 Testing facility capabilities.

Each licensee testing facility shall have the capability, at the same premises, to perform either validity screening tests or initial validity tests or both, and initial drug tests for each drug and drug metabolite for which testing is conducted.
H. Res. 245

In the House of Representatives, U.S., 

May 3, 2006.

Whereas since 2003, National Nurses Week is celebrated annually from May 6, also known as National Nurses Day, 

through May 12, the birthday of Florence Nightingale, 

the founder of modern nursing; 

Whereas National Nurses Week is the time each year when 

the importance of nursing in health care can be demonstrated; 

Whereas well-trained health professionals are the cornerstone 

of the Nation’s complex health system; 

Whereas registered nurses (‘‘RNs’’) represent the largest single component of the health care profession, with an estimated 2.7 million RNs in the United States; 

Whereas nurses historically have provided hands-on patient 

care at the bedside, and will continue to do so; 

Whereas nurses have a mandate to serve those in need, and 

to try to ease the suffering of those in pain; 

Whereas nurses also are deeply involved in health education, 

research, business, and public policy; 

Whereas nurses bear the primary responsibility for the care 

and well-being of hospital patients; 
2

•HRES 245 EH 

Whereas unfortunately, too few nurses are caring for too 

many patients in our Nation’s hospitals; 

Whereas according to a report from the Department of 

Health and Human Services, the United States currently 

has a nurse shortage of nearly 150,000 RNs and will 

have a shortage of more than 800,000 RNs by the year 

2020; 

Whereas cutting-edge technologies are useless without a staff 

of trained professionals to implement them; and 

Whereas nurses are the unsung heroines and heroes of the 

medical profession: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

(1) recognizes the important contributions of nurses 

to the health care system of the United States; 

(2) supports the goals and ideals of National 

Nurses Week, as founded by the American Nurses Association; and 

(3) encourages the people of the United States to 

observe National Nurses Week with appropriate recognition, ceremonies, activities, and programs to demonstrate 

the importance of nurses to the everyday lives of patients.

Attest: 

Clerk.
120 STAT. 2760 PUBLIC LAW 109–408—DEC. 18, 2006

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 6102:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 152 (2006):

Sept. 25, considered and passed House.

Dec. 6, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 109–408

109th Congress

An Act

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 200 Lawyers

Road, NW in Vienna, Virginia, as the ‘‘Captain Christopher P. Petty and Major

William F. Hecker, III Post Office Building’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CAPTAIN CHRISTOPHER P. PETTY AND MAJOR WILLIAM

F. HECKER, III POST OFFICE BUILDING.

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal

Service located at 200 Lawyers Road, NW in Vienna Virginia,

shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Captain Christopher P.

Petty and Major William F. Hecker, III Post Office Building’’.

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation,

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference

to the ‘‘Captain Christopher P. Petty and Major William F. Hecker,

III Post Office Building’’.

Approved December 18, 2006.

Dec. 18, 2006

[H.R. 6102]
#### BEAUDRY v. McKINNON et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

June 5, 1914.)

Action by William A. Beaudry against John N. McKinnon and others.

No opinion. Motion granted, and injunction continued, on plaintiff's giving an undertaking of $1,000 within five days after decision of this motion. Defendants to have leave to move to vacate stay, if appeal is not argued on June 12th. Settle order on notice. See, also, 148 N. Y. Supp. 1105.
835.001-70 Veterans Affairs (VA) definitions.

Research means a systematic investigation, including research development, testing and evaluation,

designed to develop or contribute to generalized knowledge.

Research impropriety refers to noncompliance with the laws, regulations, and policies regarding

human subject protections, laboratory animal welfare, research safety, research laboratory security,

research information security, and research misconduct. It does not encompass improper

procedures or conduct in areas outside of the mandate of the Office of Research Oversight (ORO)

(e.g., waste, fraud, abuse, or fiscal mismanagement).

Research misconduct means fabrication, falsification, or plagiarism in proposing, performing, or

reviewing research, or in reporting research results.

VA facility means a component of the VA national health care system, such as a VA Medical Center,

VA Health Care System, or VA Medical and Regional Office Center.

Parent topic: PART 835 - RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CONTRACTING
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) CR. NO. 2:06mj76-SRW

)

EUGENE L. CLECKLER )

KIM CLECKLER )

ORDER

On August 8, 2006, defendants waived their preliminary hearing in this case. Based

on this waiver and on the complaint filed in this matter, the Magistrate Judge finds that there

is probable cause to bind the defendants over to the District Court for further proceedings.

DONE, this 10th day of August, 2006.

/s/ Susan Russ Walker 

SUSAN RUSS WALKER

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

Case 2:06-cr-00202-WKW-CSC Document 13 Filed 08/10/2006 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

 ____________________________

JAMES TYRONE EDWARDS, *

#244 859

Plaintiff, *

v. * 3:06-CV-740-MHT

SGT. MOORE, et al., *

Defendants. *

 _____________________________

ORDER

It has come to the court’s attention that Plaintiff is no longer housed at the Limestone

Correctional Facility which is the last known address the court has on file for Plaintiff. All

parties have an affirmative duty to inform this court of any change of address during the

pendency of their actions. Plaintiff was provided notice of this requirement in the court’s

October 3, 2006 order of procedure. (Doc. No. 13.) 

Upon review of the pleadings filed in the instant matter, it is clear that the court file

does not contain an alternate address for Plaintiff and that he has not provided this court his

current address. Accordingly, the court concludes that Plaintiff shall be granted an

opportunity to show cause why his complaint should not be dismissed for his failure to keep

the court informed of his current address.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that:

Case 3:06-cv-00740-MHT-SRW Document 27 Filed 02/29/2008 Page 1 of 2
2

1. Plaintiff SHOW CAUSE on or before March 10, 2008 why his complaint

should not be dismissed for his failure to provide the court with his current address as

directed by the court’s October 3, 2006 order of procedure. Plaintiff is cautioned that his

failure to comply with this order will result in a Recommendation that his complaint be

dismissed without prejudice; and

2. The Clerk of Court SEND a copy of this order to Plaintiff at his last known

address.

DONE, this 29th day of February 2008.

 /s/ Susan Russ Walker 

SUSAN RUSS WALKER

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-00740-MHT-SRW Document 27 Filed 02/29/2008 Page 2 of 2
§ 440.23 Oversight, training, and technical assistance. ( a ) The Secretary and the appropriate Support Office Director, in coordination with the Secretary of Health and Human Services, shall monitor and evaluate the operation of projects carried out by CAA's receiving financial assistance under this part through on-site inspections, or through other means, in order to ensure the effective provision of weatherization assistance for the dwelling units of low-income persons.
( b ) DOE shall also carry out periodic evaluations of a program and weatherization projects that are not carried out by a CAA and that are receiving financial assistance under this part.
( c ) The Secretary and the appropriate Support Office Director, the Comptroller General of the United States, and for a weatherization project carried out by a CAA, the Secretary of Health and Human Services or any of their duly authorized representatives, shall have access to any books, documents, papers, information, and records of any weatherization project receiving financial assistance under the Act for the purpose of audit and examination.
( d ) Each grantee shall ensure that audits by or on behalf of subgrantees are conducted with reasonable frequency, on a continuing basis, or at scheduled intervals, usually annually, but not less frequently than every two years, in accordance with 10 CFR part 600, and OMB Circular 110, Attachment F, as applicable.
( e ) The Secretary may reserve from the funds appropriated for any fiscal year an amount not to exceed 20 percent to provide, directly or indirectly, training and technical assistance to any grantee or subgrantee. Such training and technical assistance may include providing information concerning conservation practices to occupants of eligible dwelling units.
[49 FR 3629, Jan. 27, 1984, as amended at 58 FR 12529, Mar. 4, 1993; 74 FR 12540, Mar. 25, 2009]
###### Editorial Note on Part 4

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 4 appear at 77 FR 39904, July 6, 2012.

#### §§ 4.571-4.999 [Reserved]
#### In the Matter of Elvin Lebron, Appellant, v New York City Department of Corrections et al., Respondents.

Submitted November 5, 2007;

decided December 18, 2007

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine *1001the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution. Motion for poor person relief dismissed as academic.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Intervoice, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for
the period ended November 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, Robert E. Ritchey, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), that:  1.
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Exchange Act; and2.

    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. This Certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act. Date: January 10, 2005 /s/ Robert E. RitcheyRobert E. RitcheyPresident and Chief Executive Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 892 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 892

  To adjust the amount of monthly old-age, survivors, and disability 
 insurance payments under title II of the Social Security Act based on 
              locality-based comparability payment rates.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 6, 2017

   Ms. Meng introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To adjust the amount of monthly old-age, survivors, and disability 
 insurance payments under title II of the Social Security Act based on 
              locality-based comparability payment rates.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Locality-based Social Security 
Benefits Act of 2017''.

SEC. 2. SOCIAL SECURITY BENEFIT AMOUNTS ADJUSTED TO REFLECT LOCALITY-
              BASED COMPARABILITY PAYMENT RATES.

    Notwithstanding title II of the Social Security Act, the 
Commissioner of Social Security shall increase the monthly benefit 
amount to which each individual is otherwise entitled under such title 
by the percentage determined by the President under sections 5304 and 
5304a of title 5, United States Code, for the locality pay area (as 
established in section 531.603 of title 5, Code of Federal Regulations) 
in which the individual resides at the time of such increase.
                                 <all>
```