alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 23 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                      February 1, 2005.
Whereas America's Catholic schools are internationally acclaimed for their 
        academic excellence, but provide students more than a superior 
        scholastic education;
Whereas Catholic schools ensure a broad, values-added education emphasizing the 
        lifelong development of moral, intellectual, physical, and social values 
        in America's young people;
Whereas the total Catholic school student enrollment for the 2004-2005 academic 
        year is about 2.5 million and the student-teacher ratio is 15 to 1;
Whereas Catholic schools teach a diverse group of students;
Whereas more than 26 percent of school children enrolled in Catholic schools are 
        from minority backgrounds, and nearly 14 percent are non-Catholics;
Whereas Catholic schools produce students strongly dedicated to their faith, 
        values, families, and communities by providing an intellectually 
        stimulating environment rich in spiritual, character, and moral 
        development;
Whereas in the 1972 pastoral message concerning Catholic education, the National 
        Conference of Catholic Bishops stated: ``Education is one of the most 
        important ways by which the Church fulfills its commitment to the 
        dignity of the person and building of community. Community is central to 
        education ministry, both as a necessary condition and an ardently 
        desired goal. The educational efforts of the Church, therefore, must be 
        directed to forming persons-in-community; for the education of the 
        individual Christian is important not only to his solitary destiny, but 
        also the destinies of the many communities in which he lives.''; and
Whereas January 30 to February 5, 2005, has been designated as Catholic Schools 
        Week by the National Catholic Educational Association and the United 
        States Conference of Catholic Bishops: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) supports the goals of Catholic Schools Week, an event co-
        sponsored by the National Catholic Educational Association and the 
        United States Conference of Catholic Bishops and established to 
        recognize the vital contributions of America's thousands of Catholic 
        elementary and secondary schools; and
            (2) congratulates Catholic schools, students, parents, and teachers 
        across the Nation for their ongoing contributions to education, and for 
        the key role they play in promoting and ensuring a brighter, stronger 
        future for this Nation.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
EXHIBIT 10.3


Sotheby’s

1334 York Avenue

New York, New York 10021


	
  

 	
  

 	
  

 
	
  

 	
  

 	
 February 9, 2010

 
	
  

 	
  

 	
  

 
	
 Mr. William F. Ruprecht

 	
  

 
	
  

 	
 President and Chief Executive Officer

 	
  

 
	
  

 	
 Sotheby’s

 	
  

 
	
  

 	
 1334 York Avenue

 	
  

 
	
  

 	
 New York, New York 10021

 	
  

 



Re:     Employment
Arrangement


Dear Bill:


          The
Compensation Committee has considered your request to forego any 2009-related
cash bonus compensation and has decided to honor it. In addition, you have asked that your 2010 stock award be awarded
in the form of performance share units, notwithstanding the fact that your
current employment arrangement (the “Arrangement”) calls for you to receive an
award of restricted stock units. A
waiver from you is necessary to permit the Company to issue you performance
share units at the February 9, 2010 Compensation Committee meeting. 


          The
Arrangement permits you to terminate your employment with the Company for “Good
Reason” (as defined in Exhibit D to the Arrangement) for the Company’s failure
to award you at least $1,400,000 in restricted stock or restricted stock units
prior to March 31 in any year during the Term (as defined in the Arrangement).
You agree to waive your right to receive any 2010 stock award in the form of
restricted stock or restricted stock units and agree to accept any such award
in the form of performance share units.
You further agree that any right to receive dividends in respect of
those performance share units shall be governed by the terms of that award. 


          If
this letter agreement correctly states the terms of your waiver regarding the
Arrangement, please acknowledge where indicated below.


	
  

 	
  

 	
  

 	
  

 
	
  

 	
 Sincerely,

 	
  

 
	
  

 	
  

 	
  

 	
  

 
	
  

 	
 SOTHEBY’S

 	
  

 
	
  

 	
  

 	
  

 	
  

 
	
  

 	
 By:

 	
 /S/ SUSAN ALEXANDER

 	
  

 
	
  

 	
  

 	
        Susan
 Alexander,

 
	
  

 	
  

 	
          Executive
 Vice President and

 
	
  

 	
  

 	
          Worldwide
 Head of Human Resources

 






	
  

 	
  

 
	
 AGREED AND ACCEPTED AS OF

 
	
 THE DATE OF THIS LETTER

 	
  

 
	
 AGREEMENT:

 	
  

 
	
  

 	
  

 
	
 /S/ WILLIAM F. RUPRECHT

 	
  

 
	
 WILLIAM F. RUPRECHT
#### § 436.40 Purpose and scope.

This subpart provides guidance to promote the procurement of energy efficient products by Federal agencies and promote procurement practices which facilitate the procurement of energy efficient products, consistent with the requirements in section 553 of the National Energy Conservation Policy Act. (42 U.S.C. 8259b)
PGI 219.811-2 Competitive.

Awards made under the PA cited in DFARS 219.800 shall be prepared in accordance with the

procedures in PGI 219.811-1 .

Parent topic: PGI 219.811 Preparing the contracts.
#### JAMES C. McGUIRE & CO. v. H. G. VOGEL CO.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

July 10, 1914.)

Action by Jame*s*C. McGuire & Co. against the H. G. Vogel Company.

No opinion. Application granted. Order signed. See, also, 148 N. Y. Supp. 178.
| (logo) plante moran | **Plante & Moran, PLLC**

10 South Riverside Plaza

9th floor

Chicago, IL 60606

Tel: 312.207.1040

Fax: 312.207.1066

plantemoran.com |
|---------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

Report of IndependentRegistered Public Accounting Firm

 

 

To the Board of Directors

National Tax Search, LLC

 

We have examined National TaxSearch, LLC’s (the “Company”) compliance with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB Servicing Criteria, set forth inItem 1122(d) of the Security and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB forthe National Tax Search TaxQ system (the “Platform”) as of and forthe year ended December 31, 2016. The Company has determined that only certainservicing criteria, 1122(d)(l)(ii), 1122(d)1(iv), 1122(d)2(ii), 1122(d)2(v),1122(d)2(vi), 1122(d)(4)(xi), and 1122(d)(4)(xii), are applicable to theactivities performed by it with respect to the Platform covered by this report.The Company has determined that the remaining servicing criteria set forth inItem 1122(d) of the SEC Regulation AB are not applicable to the activitiesperformed by it with respect to the Platform covered by this report.

 

Management is responsible forthe Company's compliance with those servicing criteria. Our responsibility isto express an opinion on management's assertion about the Company's compliancewith the servicing criteria based on our examination. Our examination wasconducted in accordance with standards of the Public Company AccountingOversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a testbasis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the applicable servicingcriteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in thecircumstances. Our examination included a selection of a sample of transactionsand compliance activities related to the Platform during the examination periodand determining whether the Company processed those transactions and performedthose activities in compliance with the servicing criteria. Our testing ofselected transactions and compliance activities was limited to calculations,reports, and activities performed by the Company during the period covered bythis report. Our procedures did not include determining whether errors may haveoccurred prior to our tests that may have affected the balances or amountscalculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this reportfor the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe that our examinationprovides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide alegal determination on the Company’s compliance with the servicingcriteria.

 

In our opinion,management’s assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned servicingcriteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016 for the Platform isfairly stated in all material respects.

 

 

/s/ Plante & Moran, PLLC

 

Chicago, IL

January 27, 2017

 

 

(logo) Praxity 

MEMBER

GLOBAL ALLIANCE OF 

INDEPENDENT FIRMS
PGI 204.403 Responsibilities of contracting officers.       (1) Consistent with the requirements at FAR Subpart 4.403, contracting officers shall ensure that solicitations, to include any Broad Agency Announcement (BAA) or notice to industry, that requires industry access to classified information and/or controlled unclassified information (see policy memos), shall contain one or more of the following:          (i) Draft DoD Form DD 254, DoD Contract Security Classification Specification.          See Defense Security Service (DSS) guide for the preparation of the DD Form 254 at http://www.dss.mil/isp/tools.html and select “A Guide for the Preparation of a DD Form 254”.          (ii) The clause at FAR 52.204-2, Security Requirements.          (iii) Detailed agency instructions for industry requirements to request access to classified information and/or controlled unclassified information. Agency instructions shall clearly reference and be in accordance with the National Industrial Security Program Operating Manual (NISPOM) (DoD 5220-22-M) and Industrial Security Regulation (DoD 5220.22-R).          (iv) The following is a template of agency instructions to industry:          “Offerors must have a valid U.S. security clearance of *[to be filled in by the contracting officer]* or higher in order to respond to this RFP (Announcement), because the RFP (Announcement) includes an annex (information) classified at the *[to be filled in by the contracting officer]* level which will be released only to offerors possessing the appropriate clearance. All classified material must be handled in accordance with the National Industrial Security Program Operating Manual (NISPOM) (DoD 5220-22-M) and Industrial Security Regulation (DoD 5220.22-R).”          (2) Fundamental research project determination.          (i) Projects being scoped as fundamental research may include the entire contract effort or a specified portion of the statement of work, and must be documented in the written determination and in the contract.          (ii) The determination of fundamental research shall occur when the project is added to the statement of work, either prior to award or during a contract modification that modified the statement of work.          (iii) Fundamental research is defined in the USD(A&S) memorandum on Fundamental Research, dated May 24, 2010.          (iv) See clause 252.204-7000(a)(3), concerning disclosure of information for fundamental research projects.    **Parent topic:** PGI 204.4 -SAFEGUARDING CLASSIFIED INFORMATION WITHIN INDUSTRY
#### In re Mills.

[Cite as *In re Mills,*116 Ohio St.3d 288, 2007-Ohio-6455.]

(No. 2007-0609

Submitted November 28, 2007

Decided December 11, 2007.)

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of *In re C.S.,*115 Ohio St.3d 267, 2007-Ohio-4919, 874 N.E.2d 1177.

Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.

*289James J. Mayer Jr., Richland County Prosecuting Attorney, and Stephen M. Wildermuth, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant.

David H. Bodiker, State Public Defender, and Amanda J. Powell, Assistant State Public Defender, for appellee.
Editorial Note on Part 982
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 982 appear at 61 FR 17559, Apr. 22, 1996.

§ 982.34 Qualification. ( a ) Any person prior to selection as a member or an alternate member of the Board shall qualify by filing with the Secretary a written acceptance of willingness to serve on the Board.
( b ) Each grower member and alternate shall be, at the time of selection and during the term of office, a grower or an officer, employee, or agent of a grower in the district for which nominated.
( c ) Each handler member and alternate shall be, at the time of selection and during the term of office, a handler or an officer, employee, or agent of a handler.
( d ) Any member or alternate member who at the time of selection was a member (or employed by or an agent of a member) of the group which nominated that person shall, upon ceasing to be such, become disqualified to serve further and that position shall be deemed vacant. In the event any grower member or alternate member of the Board handles hazelnuts produced by other growers or becomes an employee or agent of a handler, that person shall be disqualified to continue to serve on the Board in that capacity.
( e ) No person nominated to serve as a public member or alternate member shall have a financial interest in any hazelnut growing or handling operation.
( f ) The Board, with the approval of the Secretary, may issue rules and regulations covering matters of qualifications for members or alternate members.
[51 FR 29547, Aug. 19, 1986]
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR

THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

FARMERS TELECOMMUNICATIONS )

COOPERATIVE, INC., )

 )

Plaintiff, )

 )

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:06CV790-WC

 )

VERIZON BUSINESS NETWORK )

SERVICES INC., et al., )

 )

Defendants. )

ORDER ON MOTION

On March 16, 2007, Defendant Verizon Business Network Services, Inc. filed a Joint

Motion for a 30-day Extension of Time for Filing Rule 26(a)(1) Disclosures (Doc. #31). Upon

consideration of the joint motion, and for good cause, it is 

ORDERED that the motion (Doc. #31) is GRANTED. The parties must exchange Initial

Disclosures on or before April 16, 2007.

Done this 19th day of March, 2007.

/s/ Wallace Capel, Jr.

WALLACE CAPEL, JR.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00790-WC Document 32 Filed 03/19/2007 Page 1 of 1
PGI 244.305-70 Policy.       (c)  *Disposition of findings*.          (2)  *Initial determination*.          (ii)(A)  Within 10 days of receiving the report, if the contracting officer makes a determination that there is a significant deficiency, the contracting officer should provide an initial determination of deficiencies and a copy of the report to the contractor and require the contractor to submit a written response.          (C)  *Evaluation of contractor's response*.  Within 30 days of receiving the contractor’s response, the contracting officer, in consultation with the auditor or cognizant functional specialist, should evaluate the contractor’s response and make a final determination.          (3)  *Final Determination*.          (ii)(A)  *Monitoring contractors’ corrective action*.  The contracting officer and Purchasing System Analyst (PSA) or auditor shall monitor the contractor's progress in correcting deficiencies.  If the contractor fails to make adequate progress, the contracting officer shall take whatever action is necessary to ensure that the contractor corrects the deficiencies.  Examples of actions the contracting officer can take are:  withdraw or withhold approval of the system; bringing the issue to the attention of higher level management, implementing or increasing the withholding in accordance with 252.242-7005, Contractor Business Systems, and recommending non-award of potential contracts.          (B)  *Correction of significant deficiencies*.          (*1*)  When the contractor notifies the contracting officer that the contractor has corrected the significant deficiencies, the contracting officer shall request the PSA or auditor to review the correction to determine if the deficiencies have been resolved.          (*2*)  The contracting officer shall determine if the contractor has corrected the deficiencies.          (*3*)  If the contracting officer determines the contractor has corrected the deficiencies, the contracting officer's notification shall be sent to the PSA; auditor; payment office; appropriate action officers responsible for reporting past performance at the requiring activities; and each contracting and contract administration office having substantial business with the contractor as applicable.    **Parent topic:** PGI 244.305 RESERVED
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 99.10

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report of ImClone
Systems Incorporated (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30,
2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Michael J. Howerton, Vice President, Finance and Business
Development, Secretary and Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

/s/ MICHAEL J. HOWERTON
------------------------------
Michael J. Howerton
Acting Chief Financial Officer
June 23, 2003
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 276 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 276

 Supporting the goals and ideals of Pancreatic Cancer Awareness Month.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 12, 2005

 Mr. Platts submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                   the Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Supporting the goals and ideals of Pancreatic Cancer Awareness Month.

Whereas over 31,860 people will be diagnosed with pancreatic cancer this year in 
        the United States;
Whereas the mortality rate for pancreatic cancer is 99 percent, the highest of 
        any cancer;
Whereas pancreatic cancer is the 4th most common cause of cancer death in the 
        United States;
Whereas there are no early detection methods and minimal treatment options for 
        pancreatic cancer;
Whereas when symptoms of pancreatic cancer generally present themselves, it is 
        too late for an optimistic prognosis, and the average survival rate of 
        those diagnosed with metastasis disease is only three to six months;
Whereas pancreatic cancer does not discriminate by age, gender, or race, and 
        only four percent of patients survive beyond five years;
Whereas the Pancreatic Cancer Action Network (PanCAN), the first national 
        patient advocacy organization serving the pancreatic cancer community, 
        focuses its efforts on public policy, research funding, patient 
        services, and public awareness and education related to developing 
        effective treatments and a cure for pancreatic cancer; and
Whereas the Pancreatic Cancer Action Network has requested that the Congress 
        designate November as Pancreatic Cancer Awareness Month in order to 
        educate communities across the Nation about pancreatic cancer and the 
        need for research funding, early detection methods, effective 
        treatments, and prevention programs: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives supports the goals and 
ideals of Pancreatic Cancer Awareness Month.
                                 <all>
```
#### BUSHBY v. BERKELEY.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

July 10, 1914.)

Action by James C. Bushby against Lancelot M. Berkeley.

No opinion. Motion to dismiss appeal granted, with $10 costs. Order filed. For opinion below, see 85 Misc. Rep. 178, 148 N. Y. Supp. 121.
#### § 97.120 Corrected certificate—office mistake.

When a certificate is incorrect because of a mistake in the Office, the Commissioner may issue a corrected certificate stating the fact and nature of such mistake, under seal, without charge, to be issued to the owner and recorded in the records at the Office.
Editorial Note on Part 37
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 37 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

§ 37.73 Applicability of physical protection of category 1 and category 2 quantities of radioactive material during transit. ( a ) For shipments of category 1 quantities of radioactive material, each shipping licensee shall comply with the requirements for physical protection contained in §§ 37.75(a) and (e); 37.77; 37.79(a)(1), (b)(1), and (c); and 37.81(a), (c), (e), (g) and (h).
( b ) For shipments of category 2 quantities of radioactive material, each shipping licensee shall comply with the requirements for physical protection contained in §§ 37.75(b) through (e); 37.79(a)(2), (a)(3), (b)(2), and (c); and 37.81(b), (d), (f), (g), and (h). For those shipments of category 2 quantities of radioactive material that meet the criteria of § 71.97(b) of this chapter, the shipping licensee shall also comply with the advance notification provisions of § 71.97 of this chapter.
( c ) The shipping licensee shall be responsible for meeting the requirements of this subpart unless the receiving licensee has agreed in writing to arrange for the in-transit physical protection required under this subpart.
( d ) Each licensee that imports or exports category 1 quantities of radioactive material shall comply with the requirements for physical protection during transit contained in §§ 37.75(a)(2) and (e); 37.77; 37.79(a)(1), (b)(1), and (c); and 37.81(a), (c), (e), (g), and (h) for the domestic portion of the shipment.
( e ) Each licensee that imports or exports category 2 quantities of radioactive material shall comply with the requirements for physical protection during transit contained in §§ 37.79(a)(2), (a)(3), and (b)(2); and 37.81(b), (d), (f), (g), and (h) for the domestic portion of the shipment.
#### § 993.11 Standard processed prunes.

*Standard processed prunes* means any lot of processed prunes meeting the applicable grade and size standards prescribed pursuant to § 993.50.