alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Subpart 2834.0 - General

Parent topic: PART 2834 - MAJOR SYSTEM ACQUISITION

2834.002 Policy.

The Small Business and Federal Procurement Competition Enhancement Act of 1984 allows an

executive agency to establish a dollar threshold for the designation of a major system, in accordance

with Public Law 98-577. Dollar thresholds for a major system under OMB Circular A-109 are

designated in this section.

(a) Major automated information system. Within DOJ, a major automated information system is one

whose life-cycle cost is in excess of $100 million.

(b) Major real property system.

(1) By purchase, when the assessed value of the property exceeds $60 million.

(2) By lease, when the annual rental charges, including basic services (e.g., cleaning, guards,

maintenance), exceed $1.8 million.

(3) By transfer from another agency at no cost when the assessed value of the property exceeds $12

million.

(c) Research and development (R&D) system. Any R&D activity expected to exceed $500,000 for the

R&D phase is subject to OMB Circular A-109, unless exempted by the HCA or designee under

paragraph (e) of this section.

(d) Any other system or activity. The HCA or designee responsible for the system may designate any

system or activity as a Major System under OMB Circular A-109, e.g., selected systems designed to

support more than one principal organizational unit.

(e) Exemption. The CAO, upon recommendation by the HCA or designee responsible for the system,

may determine that, because of the routine nature of the acquisition, the system (e.g., an

information system utilizing only off-the-shelf hardware or software) will be exempt from the OMB

Circular A-109 process, even where by virtue of the life cycle costs it would otherwise be identified

as “major” in response to OMB Circular A-109.

2834.003 Responsibilities.

(a) The SPE is the agency head for the purposes of FAR 34.003(a).

(b) The CAO is the agency head for the purposes of FAR 34.003(c).

2834.005 General requirements.
2834.005-6 Full production.

The CAO is the agency head for the purposes of FAR 34.005-6.
PGI 230.201-5 Waiver.

(a)(1)(i) Unless otherwise authorized by the Principal Director, Defense Pricing and Contracting

(DPC), the military departments must submit each CAS waiver request toDPC (Price, Cost and

Finance) for review at least 14 days before granting the waiver. Submit waiver requests via email at

osd.pentagon.ousd-a-s.mbx.dpc-pcf@mail.mil.

(ii) DoD contracting activities that are not within a military department must submit CAS waiver

requests that meet the conditions in FAR 30.201-5(b) to the Principal Director, (DPC) for approval at

least 30 days before the anticipated contract award date.

(e) The annual report of exceptional case CAS waivers shall include the following:

Title: Waiver of CAS Requirements

(1) Contract number, including modification number, if applicable, and program name.

(2) Contractor name.

(3) Contracting activity.

(4) Total dollar amount waived.

(5) Brief description of why the item(s) could not be obtained without a waiver.

(6) Brief description of the specific steps taken to ensure price reasonableness.

(7) Brief description of the demonstrated benefits of granting the waiver.

Parent topic: PGI 230.201 Contract Requirements.
#### The People of the State of New York, by Eliot Spitzer, Attorney General of the State of New York, Appellant, v Richard A. Grasso et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants.

Decided December 17, 2007

Reported below, 42 AD3d 126.

On reading and filing the stipulation of withdrawal on behalf of respondent New York Stock Exchange, it is ordered that the appeal by the New York Stock Exchange in the above cause be and the same hereby is withdrawn.
#### § 460.103 Installation of insulation.

Insulating materials must be installed according to the insulation manufacturer's installation instructions and the requirements set forth in table 1 to 460.103, which is adapted from section R402 of the 2021 IECC.

| Component | Installation requirements |
| --- | --- |
| General | Air-permeable insulation must not be used as a material to establish the air barrier. |
| Access hatches, panels, and doors | Access hatches, panels, and doors between conditioned space and unconditioned space, such as attics and crawlspaces, must be insulated to a level equivalent to the insulation of the surrounding surface, must provide access to all equipment that prevents damaging or compressing the insulation, and must provide a wood-framed or equivalent baffle or retainer when loose fill insulation is installed within an exterior ceiling assembly to retain the insulation both on the access hatch, panel, or door and within the building thermal envelope. |
| Baffles | For air-permeable insulations in vented attics, a baffle must be installed adjacent to soffit and eave vents. Baffles, when used in conjunction with eave venting, must be constructed using a solid material, maintain an opening equal or greater than the size of the vents, and extend over the top of the attic insulation. |
| Ceiling or attic | The insulation in any dropped ceiling or dropped soffit must be aligned with the air barrier. |
| Narrow cavities | Batts to be installed in narrow cavities must be cut to fit or narrow cavities must be filled with insulation that upon installation readily conforms to the available cavity space. |
| Rim joists | Rim joists must be insulated such that the insulation maintain permanent contact with the exterior rim board. |
| Shower or tub adjacent to exterior wall | Exterior walls adjacent to showers and tubs must be insulated. |
| Walls | Air permeable exterior building thermal envelope insulation for framed exterior walls must completely fill the cavity, including within stud bays caused by blocking lay flats or headers. |

Table 1 to § 460.103—Installation of Insulation
Editorial Note on Part 26
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 26 appear at 87 FR 71455, Nov. 22, 2022.

§ 26.406 Fitness monitoring. ( a ) The requirements in this section apply only if a licensee or other entity does not elect to subject the individuals specified in § 26.4(f) to random testing for drugs and alcohol under § 26.405(b).
( b ) Licensees and other entities shall implement a fitness monitoring program to deter substance abuse and detect indications of possible use, sale, or possession of illegal drugs; use or possession of alcohol while constructing or directing the construction of safety- or security-related SSCs; or impairment from any cause that if left unattended may result in a risk to public health and safety or the common defense and security.
( c ) Licensees and other entities shall establish procedures that monitors shall follow in response to the indications and actions specified in paragraph (b) of this section and train the monitors to implement the program.
( d ) Licensees and other entities shall ensure that the fitness of individuals specified in § 26.4(f) is monitored effectively while the individuals are constructing or directing the construction of safety- and security-related SSCs, commensurate with the potential risk to public health and safety and the common defense and security imposed by the construction activity. To achieve this objective, licensees and other entities shall consider the number and placement of monitors required, the necessary ratio of monitors to individuals specified in § 26.4(f), and the frequency with which the individuals specified in § 26.4(f) shall be monitored while constructing or directing the construction of each safety- or security-related SSC.
[73 FR 17176, Mar. 31, 2008, as amended at 75 FR 73941, Nov. 30, 2010]
#### § 1013.40 Stays ordered by the Department of Justice.

If at any time the Attorney General or an Assistant Attorney General designated by the Attorney General transmits to the authority head a written finding that continuation of the administrative process described in this part with respect to a claim or statement may adversely affect any pending or potential criminal or civil action related to such claim or statement, the authority head shall stay the process immediately. The authority head may order the process resumed only upon receipt of the written authorization of the Attorney General.
837.7001 Solicitation provisions and contract

clauses.

(a) The contracting officer shall insert the basic or the alternate of the provision at 852.237-76,

Award to Single Offeror, in solicitations and contracts for mortuary services as follows:

(1) Insert the provision in all sealed bid solicitations for mortuary services; and

(2) Insert the basic provision with its alternate I in all negotiated solicitations for mortuary services.

(b) The contracting officer shall insert in addition to FAR 52.216-21, Requirements, the following VA

clauses in all mortuary service solicitations and contracts:

(1) 852.237-77, Area of Performance.

(2) 852.237-78, Performance and Delivery.

(3) 852.237-79, Subcontracting.

(4) 852.237-80, Health Department and Transport Permits.

(c) See also 816.506-70 and 849.504-70 for additional clauses for use in contracts for mortuary

services.

Parent topic: Subpart 837.70 - Mortuary Services
823.303-70 Contract clause.       Contracting officers shall insert clause 852.223-71, Safety and Health, in solicitations and contracts that involve hazardous materials for the following types of requirements:          (a) Research, development, or test projects.          (b) Transportation of hazardous materials.          (c) Construction.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 823.3 - Hazardous Material Identification and Material Safety Data
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
financial statements for the six months ended December 31, 2000 and
is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2001
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-2000
<CASH>                                       2,048,890
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  727,755
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  5,263,320
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            10,398,839
<PP&E>                                      37,684,042
<DEPRECIATION>                              19,332,402
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              29,678,127
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       11,144,249
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        47,326
<OTHER-SE>                                  11,619,717
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                29,678,127
<SALES>                                     22,524,964
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            22,524,964
<CGS>                                       19,607,756
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               19,607,756
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,537,270
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             471,455
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (513,197)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (178,835)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (334,362)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (334,362)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (.071)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (.071)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 35.2

[First Republic Bank Logo]

Feb 28, 2015

Servicer Compliance Statement

For SEMT 2013-1 (see Schedule A)

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of First Republic Bank (the Servicer), does hereby certify that:



| | (i) | a review of the Servicers activities during the reporting period from January 1, 2014 through December 31, 2014 and of its performance under the Agreement (as defined on Schedule A attached hereto) from
the above referenced trust during such period has been made under such officers supervision, and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | to the best of such officers knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under this Agreement in all material respects throughout such reporting period.
| | ---- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



First Republic BankBy:

/s/ Lionel AntunesName:

Lionel AntunesTitle:

Vice President of Residential LendingDate:

Feb. 28, 2015




---

<for SEMT 2013-1>

SCHEDULE A



| | 1. | Flow Mortgage Loan Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of July 1, 2010, between Redwood Residential Acquisition Corporation and First Republic Bank, as modified by the Reconstitution Agreement dated
January 15, 2013 (the Agreement).
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Flow Mortgage Loan Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of July 1, 2010, between Redwood Residential Acquisition Corporation and First Republic Bank, as modified by the Reconstitution Agreement dated
September 18, 2012, among Barclays Bank, Redwood Residential Acquisition Corporation and First Republic Bank, and modified by the Reconstitution Agreement dated January 15, 2013 (the Agreement).
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Each of the foregoing an Agreement for purposes of this Servicer Compliance Statement.
PGI 245.102-70 Policy.

(1) A basic principle of the Federal Acquisition Regulations System is that, upon contract award,

contractors bring all the necessary organization, experience, accounting and operational controls,

property, and technical skills, or the ability to obtain them (reference FAR 9.104-1 (e), (f), and (g) of

General Standards). Therefore, upon contract award, responsible contractors should have the means

to provide effective and efficient stewardship of Government property.

(2) Government property, as defined at FAR 45.101, must be contractually accountable to a single

contract and only one contract at a time. This requirement applies to both Government-furnished

property and contractor-acquired property. Although accountable to only one contract at a time,

contract terms and conditions may allow Government property to be used on other contracts (see

FAR 52.245-9, Use and Charges).

Parent topic: PGI 245.102 RESERVED
PGI 239.7102-3 Information assurance

contractor training and certification.

(1) The designated contracting officer’s representative will document the current information

assurance certification status of contractor personnel by category and level, in the Defense

Eligibility Enrollment Reporting System, as required by DoD Manual 8570.01-M, Information

Assurance Workforce Improvement Program.

(2) DoD 8570.01-M, paragraphs C3.2.4.8.1 and C4.2.3.7.1, requires modification of existing

contracts to specify contractor training and certification requirements, in accordance with the

phased implementation plan in Chapter 9 of DoD 8570.01-M. As with all modifications, any change

to contract requirements shall be with appropriate consideration.

Parent topic: PGI 239.7102 Policy and responsibilities.
§ 500.3 Electric regions—electric region groupings for reliability measurements under the Powerplant and Industrial Fuel Use Act of 1978. ( a ) The following is a list of electric regions for use with regard to the Act. The regions are identified by FERC Power Supply Areas (PSA's) as authorized by section 202(a) of the Federal Power Act except where noted. They will be reviewed annually by ERA. Each grouping meets one or more of the following criteria: ( 1 ) Existing centrally dispatched pools and hourly power brokers;
( 2 ) Systems with joint planning and construction agreements;
( 3 ) Systems with coordination agreements in the areas of: ( i ) Generation reserve and system reliability criteria;
( ii ) Capacity and energy exchange policies;
( iii ) Maintenance scheduling; and
( iv ) Emergency procedures for dealing with capacity or fuel shortages; or
( 4 ) Systems within the same National Electric Reliability Council (NERC) region with historical coordination policies.
( b ) The PSA's referred to in the definition of electric regions in paragraph (a) of this section were first defined by the Federal Power Commission in 1936. The most recent reference to them is given in the *1970 National Power Survey,* Vol. 1, Pg. 1-3-16. In cases where a petitioner finds an ambiguity in a regional assignment, he shall consult with DOE for an official determination.
Electric Region Groupings and FERC PSA's: 1. Allegheny Power System (APS)—7, except Duquesne Light Company. 2. American Electric Power System (AEP)—entire AEP System. 3. New England Planning Pool (NEPOOL)—1, 2. 4. New York Planning Pool (NYPP)—3, 4. 5. Pennsylvania—New Jersey—Maryland interconnection (PJM)—5, 6. 6. Commonwealth Edison Company—14. 7. Florida Coordination Group (FCG)—24. 8. Middle South Utilities—25. 9. Southern Company—22, 23. 10. Gulf States Group—35. 11. Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA)—20. 12. Virginia—Carolina Group (VACAR)—18, 21. 13. Central Area Power Coordination Group (CAPCO)—Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company, Toledo Edison Company, Ohio Edison Company, Duquesne Light Company. 14. Cincinnati, Columbus, Dayton Group (CCD)—Cincinnati Gas and Electric Company, Columbus and Southern Ohio Electric Company, Dayton Power and Light Company. 15. Kentucky Group—19. 16. Indiana Group—Indiana Utilities except AEP. 17. Illinois—Missouri Group (ILLMO)—15, 40. 18. Michigan Electric Coordinated Systems (MECS)—11. 19. Wisconsin—Upper Michigan Group (WUMS)—13. 20. Mid-Continent Area Power Pool (MAAP)—16, 17, 26, 27, 28. 21. Missouri—Kansas Group (MOKAN)—24, 29. 22. Oklahoma Group—33, 36. 23. Texas Interconnected Systems (TIS)—37, 38. 24. Rocky Mountain Power Pool (RMPP)—31, 32. 25. Northwest Power Pool (NWPP)—30, 42, 43, 44, 45. 26. Arizona—New Mexico Group—39, 48 within Arizona. in Nevada and California. 27. Southern California—Nevada—47, 48. 28. Northern California—Nevada—46. 29. Alaska (non-interconnected systems to be considered separately)—49. 30. Idaho—Utah Group—41.
#### In the Matter of Gregory V. Serio, as Superintendent of the New York State Insurance Department Liquidation Bureau, et al., Appellants, v Alan G. Hevesi, as Comptroller of the State of New York, Respondent.

Submitted August 6, 2007;

decided September 6, 2007

Reported below, 40 AD3d 72.

Motions for leave to substitute Thomas E DiNapoli as a party respondent in the place and stead of Alan G. Hevesi; Eric R. Diñado as a party appellant in the place and stead of Gregory V Serio; and Mark G. Feters as a party appellant in the place and stead of James E O’Connor on the appeal herein granted.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

OFFICE OF THE CLERK

POST OFFICE BOX 711

MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA 36101-0711

DEBRA P. HACKETT, CLERK

TELEPHONE (334) 954-3600

March 30, 2007

NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY

 REGARDING CORPORATE/

CONFLICT STATEMENT

To: S.E. Lumber Company

From: Clerk’s Office

Case Style: Burkett v. McCray et al

Case Number: # 1:06-cv-00775

Notice is hereby given that pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 7.1, and this

Court’s General Order Miscellaneous Case No. 00-3047 parties are required to file their

Corporate/Conflict Disclosure Statement at their initial appearance.

No corporate/conflict disclosure statement has been filed by you in this action.

This deficiency must be corrected within ten (10) days from this date. Please refer to

attachment.

Case 1:06-cv-00775-TFM Document 52 Filed 03/30/2007 Page 1 of 1


**SAMPLE NOTICE FORMAT**

Note: When E-Filing this pleading, please enter a separate docket entry. The event entry is located on

CM/ECF by clicking: CIVIL > OTHER DOCUMENTS > CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

________________________ DIVISION

_________________________________, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CASE NO. __________________

)

_________________________________, )

)

Defendants, )

CORPORATE/CONFLICT DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

In accordance with the order of this Court, the undersigned party or parties to the

above-captioned matter do hereby make the following disclosure concerning parent

companies, subsidiaries, affiliates, partnership, joint ventures, debtor, creditors’ committee,

or other entities reportable under the provisions of the Middle District of Alabama’s General

Order No. 3047:

There are no entities to be reported.

- or -

The following entities are hereby reported:

____________________________________________________

____________________________________________________

____________________________________________________

 Signature 

 Date Counsel

 

Counsel for (print names of all parties)

 

Address, City, State Zip Code

 

Telephone Number

***Certificate of Service Required

Case 1:06-cv-00775-TFM Document 52-2 Filed 03/30/2007 Page 3 of 3
Exhibit
      32





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




The
      undersigned hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the quarterly
      report of United States Basketball League, Inc. on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly
      period ended August 31, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section
      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
      contained in such quarterly report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all
      material respects the financial condition and results of operation of United
      States Basketball League, Inc.


Date:
                  October 22, 2007/s/
                  Daniel T. Meisenheimer, IIIDaniel
                  T. Meisenheimer, IIIPresidentDate:
                  October 22, 2007/s/
                  Richard C. MeisenheimerRichard
                  C. MeisenheimerChief
                  Financial Officer
PGI 232.1001 Policy.

(a) Contracting officer action. Performance-based payments are not practical for use on all fixedprice contracts and require considerable effort between the contractor and Government to identify

the appropriate performance-based payment events and establish the proper completion criteria for

those events. Additionally, FAR 32.1003 prohibits contracts from having both progress payments and

performance-based payment financing on a contract at the same time. Additional information and

instruction on performance-based payments are provided in the DoD Performance-based Payments

Guide on the Defense Pricing and Contracting (Price, Cost and Finance) website under Pricing

Topics, Performance Based Payment. See

https://www.acq.osd.mil/asda/dpc/pcf/docs/resources-training/Performanc....

Parent topic: PGI 232.10 -PERFORMANCE-BASED PAYMENTS