alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Q 

U.S. Department Assistant secretary 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

of Transportation Washington, D C 20590 

ol^Zo^aZT^^ MAR 1 6 2011 

Johnny R. Fernandez, Esq. "(J 

Executive Director _ ,50^^ ' 

CODEZOL,C.D. o ^>^ " " 

FTZNo. 163 rr 

3540 Santiago de los Caballeros Ave. 

Ponce, Puerto Rico 00716-2011 

Dear Mr. Fernandez: 

Thank you for your February 24 letter regarding assistance to the Mercedita Airport under the 

Essential Air Service (HAS) program. As you probably know. Ponce has formally appealed the 

U,S. Department of Transportation's decision to rely on JetBlue's subsidy-free service to the 

mainland and not to renew Cape Air's EAS contract. We are currently evaluating the merits of 

the community's appeal. As is normal practice, we are placing a copy of your letter and this 

response in the Docket, which is available for public viewing at www.regulations.gov by 

entering DGT-OST-1999-6592 in the search field. 

If I can provide further information or assistance, please feel free to call me. 

Sincerely yours. 

Susan L. Kurland 

Assistant Secretary for 

Aviation and International Affairs 
SI 0-1 l()3()K-()47 

ZONA 

LIBRE 

D E L 5U R 

Honorable Ray LaHood 

Secretary of Transportadon 

United States Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave. SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

February 24,2011 

Re: Termination of EAS Ptogtam 

in Mercedita Aiiport Ponce, 

Puerto Rico 

Dear Mr. LaHood: 

I would like to let you know my concern about the terminadon of the subsidy given to the Mercedita 

Airport in the City of Ponce through the Essential Air Service Program (EAS). As a trader in the 

south area of the island this will affect directly to the economy of the entire zone. 

CODEZOL, CD., is an organization that gathers over sixty members which all are businessmen 

and women that operate their businesses in the Ponce area. We also serve twenty clients that 

represent and distribute various merchandises tn Southern Puerto Rico. 

The Airport helps us as an ad hoc airport, but also helps the tourism in the south, cast, and central 

area of the Island. Mercedita is the fastest way to connect with Puerto Rico's capital, San Juan. It is 

also essential that schedule air service, including both passenger and cargo, between Ponce and San 

Juan continue. 

Puerto Rico has a unique geographic characteristics and cultural des to the Caribbean and Latin 

America. The continuity of intemadonal air services from all the serviceable points in the island is 

essential to the cultural and economic growth of the region. The termination of the subsidy would 

imply the dismissal of the airport employees increasing unemployment percentage in Puerto Rico. 

As an employer and citizen of the south region of Puerto Rico, I urge that Mercedita Airport 

continue in the EAS platform. 

Cordially yours, 

Johnny lyFemandez, Esq. 

Executive Director 

CODEZOL. CD. 

FTZNo. 163 

3540 Santiago de los Caballeros Ave. 

Ponce, Puerto Rico 00716-2011 

Poroign Trad e Zon e #1Q 3 • P.O . Bo x 333 , Marcedlta , Puert o Ric o 00719-033 3 

Tel : (7 8 7 ] 269-4446 / ( 7 87 ] 841-OOB B • Fa x ( 7 87 ] 8 41-6 6 8 8 • Web : www.xonalibrada l
Subpart 1247.5—Ocean Transportation by U.S.-Flag Vessels    **Parent topic:** PART 1247—TRANSPORTATION1247.506 Procedures.       (a) The Maritime Administration (MARAD) is the enforcing agency of the cargo preference statutes. MARAD can assist contractors in locating U.S.-flag carriers and determine when such services are not available. MARAD can also assist contracting officers in evaluating costs, services, and other matters regarding ocean transportation.          (d) If no transportation officer is available, the contracting officer shall submit a copy of the rated “on board” bill of lading, for each shipment, no later than 20 days after the vessel's loading date for exports and 30 days for imports as stated in 46 CFR 381.3. All non-vessel ocean common carrier bills of lading should be accompanied by the underlying carrier's ocean bill of lading. The documents shall be sent to the Maritime Administration, Office of Cargo and Commercial Sealift, MAR–620, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590–0001. The bill of lading shall contain the following information—          (1) Name of sponsoring Government agency or department;          (2) Name of vessel;          (3) Vessel flag of registry;          (4) Date of loading;          (5) Port of loading;          (6) Port of final discharge;          (7) Commodity description;          (8) Gross weight in kilos; and          (9) Total ocean freight revenue in U.S. dollars.
(March 5, 1970)

#### Anne Kahn et al., Respondents, v. Riverside Syndicate, Inc., Appellant, and Annuity Fund for Congregational Ministers, Respondent.

Determination of the Appellate Term, New York County, entered on August 14, 1969, affirming final judgment of the Civil Court of the City of New York entered December 31, 1968 directing, pursuant to article 7-A of the Real Property Actions and Proceedings Law, the appointment of an administrator to operate and manage respondent’s multiple dwelling and to apply the rents to make repairs therein and granting petitioners related relief, unanimously reversed on the law and on the facts and petition dismissed without costs or disbursements. Enacted in 1965, section 769 of the Real Property Actions and Proceedings Law provides in its pertinent part: “1. A special proceeding by tenants of a multiple dwelling in the city of New York for a judgment directing the deposit of rent into court and their use for the purpose of remedying conditions dangerous to life, health or safety may be maintained in the civil court of the city of New York.” Section 770 lists the conditions considered dangerous to life, health and safety: “ lack of heat or of running water or of light or of electricity or of adequate sewerage disposal facilities, or any other condition dangerous to life, health or safety, which has existed for five days, or an infestation of rodents or any combination of such conditions.” The petition herein was dated December 19, 1967 and complained of conditions existing then and *516prior thereto. The facts established at the trial do not sustain the existence of the emergency situation which the Legislature envisaged when article 7-A was enacted in 1965. A stipulation of settlement dispositive of the original petition was executed on December 19, 1967. The stipulation, approved by the court, provided for an agreement whereunder the landlord was to make repairs and tenants’ counsel was given $3,000 in escrow to assure completion thereof. A dispute arose as to whether the landlord had corrected the conditions as provided in the stipulation and the case was restored to the Trial Calendar for May 23, 1968. It was not tried until December 20, 1968, exactly a year after the petition had been filed. That fact alone points up the lack of urgency. A close examination of the record establishes that the proof adduced was clearly insufficient to support the appointment of an administrator. The legislative intent looks to relief in eases of unusual circumstances and neglect by a landlord. Significantly the tenants were unable to establish any violation of record against the property, and their petition for a rent reduction based upon the same complaints as herein urged had been denied by the Rent Control Commission. At best the conditions complained of were transitory and sporadic. This record presents a factual situation unfortunately commonplace in many apartment houses in the City of New York and remediable well within the prior existing statutory scheme through numerous specialized housing and other municipal administrative agencies. Concur — Capozzoli, J. P., McGivern, Nunez and Steuer, JJ.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000764579
<NAME> CAS MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                           1,510,281
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      688,740
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                        794,318
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,032,278
<PP&E>                                             938,019
<DEPRECIATION>                                     761,828
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   3,320,558
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              656,300
<BONDS>                                                  0
<COMMON>                                            37,317
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (   70,423)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     3,320,558
<SALES>                                          4,945,177
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,157,021
<CGS>                                            2,166,722
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,856,950
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (28,729)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,162,077
<INCOME-TAX>                                       450,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                712,078
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                       712,078
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          .07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          .07
        

</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 35
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 35 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

§ 35.67 Requirements for possession of sealed sources and brachytherapy sources. ( a ) A licensee in possession of any sealed source or brachytherapy source shall follow the radiation safety and handling instructions supplied by the manufacturer.
( b ) A licensee in possession of a sealed source shall— ( 1 ) Test the source for leakage before its first use unless the licensee has a certificate from the supplier indicating that the source was tested within 6 months before transfer to the licensee; and
( 2 ) Test the source for leakage at intervals not to exceed 6 months or at other intervals approved by the Commission or an Agreement State in the Sealed Source and Device Registry.
( c ) To satisfy the leak test requirements of this section, the licensee shall measure the sample so that the leak test can detect the presence of 185 Bq (0.005 μCi) of radioactive material in the sample.
( d ) A licensee shall retain leak test records in accordance with § 35.2067(a).
( e ) If the leak test reveals the presence of 185 Bq (0.005 μCi) or more of removable contamination, the licensee shall— ( 1 ) Immediately withdraw the sealed source from use and store, dispose, or cause it to be repaired in accordance with the requirements in parts 20 and 30 of this chapter; and
( 2 ) File a report within 5 days of the leak test in accordance with § 35.3067.
( f ) A licensee need not perform a leak test on the following sources: ( 1 ) Sources containing only byproduct material with a half-life of less than 30 days;
( 2 ) Sources containing only byproduct material as a gas;
( 3 ) Sources containing 3.7 MBq (100 μCi) or less of beta or gamma-emitting material or 0.37 MBq (10 μCi) or less of alpha-emitting material;
( 4 ) Seeds of iridium-192 encased in nylon ribbon; and
( 5 ) Sources stored and not being used. However, the licensee shall test each such source for leakage before any use or transfer unless it has been leak tested within 6 months before the date of use or transfer.
( g ) A licensee in possession of sealed sources or brachytherapy sources, except for gamma stereotactic radiosurgery sources, shall conduct a semi-annual physical inventory of all such sources in its possession. The licensee shall retain each inventory record in accordance with § 35.2067(b).
----

|   | (1)          The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2)          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Registrant. |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/      Steven R. Williams                                                                                         | Ma     | May      21, 2008 |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|-------------------|
| Steven      R. Williams,Chief      Executive Officer,                                                               |   |
| Petroleum      Development Corporation,Managing      General Partner of the Registrant                              |   |
|                                                                                                                |   |
|                                                                                                                |   |
| /s/      Richard W. McCullough                                                                                      |   | May      21, 2008 |
| Richard      W. McCullough                                                                                          |   |
| Chief      Financial Officer,Petroleum      Development Corporation,Managing      General Partner of the Registrant |   |

----
#### Wilfredo Beltran, Appellant, v. Nat Borstein et al., Respondents.

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated October 16, 1968, which denied his motion for a special preference pursuant to CPLR 3403. Order reversed, on the law and the facts, with one bill of $10 costs and disbursements *955jointly against respondents filing separate briefs; motion for special preference granted; and case remanded to Special Term for entry of an appropriate implementing order. Plaintiff, as a result of injuries suffered in the accident in question, has been unable to work since the accident and has become a recipient of welfare from the City of. New York. The application for a special preference should have been granted *(Quinones*v. *Hunchak,*28 A D 2d 997; *Stevens*v. *Bridge Auto Renting Corp.,*262 App. Div. 872). Rabin, Acting P. J., Benjamin, Munder, Martuseello and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.
PGI 217.7103-3 Solicitations for job orders.

(1) Include in the solicitation—

(i) The nature of the work to be performed;

(ii) The date the vessel will be available to the contractor;

(iii) The date the work is to be completed; and

(iv) Whether bulk ammunition is aboard the vessel.

(2) Unless the solicitation states otherwise, offers are to be based on performance at the contractor's

site.

(3) Solicitations processed under negotiated acquisition procedures shall require offerors to include

a breakdown of the price with reasonable supporting detail in whatever format and detail the

contracting officer may request.

(4) Where practicable, afford potential offerors an opportunity to inspect the item needing repair or

alteration.

Parent topic: PGI 217.7103 Master agreements and job orders.
§ 39.103 Criminal penalties. ( a ) Section 223 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, provides for criminal sanctions for willful violation of, attempted violation of, or conspiracy to violate, any regulation issued under sections 161b, 161i, or 161o of the Act. For purposes of section 223, all the regulations in part 39 are issued under one or more of sections 161b, 161i, or 161o, except for the sections listed in paragraph (b) of this section.
( b ) The regulations in part 39 that are not issued under sections 161b, 161i, or 161o for the purposes of section 223 are as follows: §§ 39.1, 39.2, 39.5, 39.8, 39.13, 39.91, 39.101, and 39.103.
[57 FR 55074, Nov. 24, 1992]
#### SULLIVAN, Appellant, v. OLLENDORF et al., Respondents.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

December 31, 1914.)

Action by James J. Sullivan against David M. Ollendorf and another.

No opinion. Judgment affirmed, with costs. See, also, 141 N. Y. Supp. 1148.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1997
<CASH>                                             651
<SECURITIES>                                    294951
<RECEIVABLES>                                   256000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                       5325
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                146384
<PP&E>                                            7576
<DEPRECIATION>                                    5646
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  471619
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           113884
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         83
<COMMON>                                         32216
<OTHER-SE>                                     7353126
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    357735
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 47659
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                8333
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (39326)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (40126)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (40126)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.00)
        

</TABLE>
April 30, 1999

		QUARTERLY REPORT TO THE LIMITED PARTNERS
			OF DSI REALTY INCOME FUND IX


DEAR LIMITED PARTNERS:

We are pleased to enclose the Partnership's unaudited consolidated financial
statements  for  the  period  ended  March 31, 1999.  The  following  is 
Management's  discussion  and  analysis  of  the  Partnership's  financial 
condition  and  results  of  its  operations.

For the three month periods ended March 31, 1999 and 1998, total revenues
increased 7.4% from $659,862 to $708,343 and total expenses increased 18.7%
from $413,659 to $490,804.  Minority interest in income of real estate joint
venture increased slightly from $24,788 to $25,649.  As a result, net income
decreased 13.3% from $221,415 to $191,890 for the three month period ended
March 31, 1999, as compared to the same period in 1998.  The increase in
revenue can be attributed to an increase in rental income due to higher
occupancy and unit rental rates.  Occupancy levels for the Partnership's
six mini-storage facilities averaged 83.3% for the three month period ended
March 31, 1999 as compared to 81.2% for the same period in 1998.  The
Partnership is continuing its marketing efforts to attract and keep new
tenants in its various mini-storage facilities.  Operating expenses increased
by approximately $79,600 (23.5%) primarily as a result of increases in
maintenance and repair, real estate tax, salaries and wages, workers
compensation insurance expenses and property management fees, partially offset
by a decrease in yellow pages advertising costs.  Property management fees,
which are based on rental revenue, increased as a result of the increase in
rental revenue.  Power and sweeping expenses increased as a result of the
extraordinary snow removal costs associated with the blizzard that hit
Illinois, where two of the Partnership's properties are located.  General
and administrative expenses remained relatively constant.

The General Partners plan to continue their policy of funding the continuing 
improvements and maintenance of  Partnership properties with  cash generated 
from operations.  The Partnership's  resources appear to be adequate to meet 
its needs.  The  General  Partners  anticipate  distributions to the Limited 
Partners to  remain at the  current  level  for  the  foreseeable  future.

We are not enclosing a copy of the Partnership Form 10-Q as filed with the 
Securities and Exchange Commission since all the information set forth 
therein is contained either in this letter or in the attached financial 
statements. However, if you wish to receive a copy of said report, please 
send a written request to DSI Realty Income Fund IX, P.O. Box 357, Long 
Beach, California 90801. 

                              Very truly yours,

                              DSI REALTY INCOME FUND IX
                              By: DSI Properties, Inc., as
                              General Partner



                              By  /s/ Robert J. Conway
                                  ____________________________
                                 ROBERT J. CONWAY, President
EXHIBIT 32.2

           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


       In connection  with the quarterly  report of CNB Corporation on Form 10-Q
for the period  ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof,  I, Paul R.  Dusenbury,  Executive Vice President
and Chief Financial  Officer of the CNB  Corporation,  certify to the best of my
knowledge,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

1. The  above-listed  Form 10-Q fully complies with the  requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information  contained in the above-listed Form 10-Q fairly presents,  in
all material respects,  the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




                                       s/Paul R. Dusenbury
Date:  August 9, 2005                  -----------------------------------------
                                       Paul R. Dusenbury
                                       Executive Vice President and
                                       Chief Financial Officer