alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case 3:06-cv-00772-WKW-TFM Document 5 Filed 09/06/2006 Page 1 of 3
Case 3:06-cv-00772-WKW-TFM Document 5 Filed 09/06/2006 Page 2 of 3
Case 3:06-cv-00772-WKW-TFM Document 5 Filed 09/06/2006 Page 3 of 3
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION

SOUTHEASTERN BOLL WEEVIL )

ERADICATION FOUNDATION, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

v. ) 2:06cv756-MHT

) 

BOLL WEEVIL ERADICATION )

FOUNDATION OF GEORGIA, )

INC., and TOMMY IRVIN, in )

his capacity as Trustee )

of Boll Weevil Eradication )

Foundation of Georgia, )

Inc., )

)

Defendants. )

 RULE 26(F) ORDER

The parties are reminded of the obligation, imposed

by Rule 26(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, to

confer and to develop a proposed discovery plan.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Rule 26(f) report

containing the discovery plan shall be filed as soon as

practicable but not later than October 19, 2006.

Case 2:06-cv-00756-MHT-WC Document 13 Filed 09/28/2006 Page 1 of 3
2

The longstanding practice in this district is that

dispositive motions shall be filed no later than 90 days

prior to the pretrial date. If the parties seek to vary

from that schedule, they should present, in the plan,

specific case-related reasons for the requested variance.

In their Rule 26(f) report, however, the parties should

assume that the 90-day requirement will apply.

This case will be set for trial before the

undersigned judge during one of that judge's regularly

scheduled civil trial terms, within 7 to 10 months of

this order if a term is available and, if not available,

then as soon as possible thereafter. The pretrial date

is normally set within four to six weeks of a scheduled

trial term. The dates of each judge's civil trial terms

are available on the court's website located at

<http://almd.uscourts.gov> in the civil case information

section.

The court may or may not hold a scheduling conference

before issuing a scheduling order. If the court holds a

Case 2:06-cv-00756-MHT-WC Document 13 Filed 09/28/2006 Page 2 of 3
scheduling conference, counsel may participate in the

scheduling conference by conference call.

The scheduling order entered by the court will follow

the form of the Uniform Scheduling Order adopted by the

judges of this court. The Uniform Scheduling Order is

also available on the court's website.

The report of the parties should comply with Form 35

of the Appendix of Forms to the Federal Rules of Civil

Procedure.

DONE, this the 28th day of September, 2006.

 /s/ Myron H. Thompson 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00756-MHT-WC Document 13 Filed 09/28/2006 Page 3 of 3
#### CAHILL, Respondent, v. BENZ AUTO IMPORT CO. OF AMERICA, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

July 31, 1914.)

Action by Margaret Cahill, as administratrix, etc., of Teresa Cahill, deceased, against the Benz Auto Import Company of America.

No opinion. Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3259 

To suspend temporarily the duty on high current ground fault circuit 

interrupters. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 26, 2006 

Mr. FRIST (for Mrs. DOLE) introduced the following bill; which was read twice 

and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on high current ground 

fault circuit interrupters. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CERTAIN HIGH CURRENT GROUND FAULT CIR4 CUIT INTERRUPTERS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

6 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

7 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

8 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.85.35 High current ground fault circuit interrupters of 15 amps or more (provided for 

in subheading 8536.30.80) ...................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 


cchase on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
2 

•S 3259 IS 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


cchase on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 241 (Thursday, December 16, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 78680]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-31606]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

RIN 0648-XA090


New England Fishery Management Council; Public Meeting

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice; public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The New England Fishery Management Council (Council) is 
scheduling a public meeting of its Whiting Advisory Panel in January, 
2011 to consider actions affecting New England fisheries in the 
exclusive economic zone (EEZ). Recommendations from this group will be 
brought to the full Council for formal consideration and action, if 
appropriate.

DATES: The meeting will be held on Tuesday, January 11, 2011 at 9:30 
a.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Radisson Airport Hotel, 2081 
Post Road, Warwick, RI 02886: telephone: (401) 739-3000; fax: (401) 
732-9309.
    Council address: New England Fishery Management Council, 50 Water 
Street, Mill 2, Newburyport, MA 01950.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul J. Howard, Executive Director, 
New England Fishery Management Council; telephone: (978) 465-0492.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Whiting Advisory Panel will discuss and 
provide feedback on potential accountability measures for Annual Catch 
Limit (ACL) management under Draft Amendment 18. Other issues related 
to ACL management may also be discussed.
    Although non-emergency issues not contained in this agenda may come 
before this group for discussion, those issues may not be the subject 
of formal action during this meeting. Action will be restricted to 
those issues specifically listed in this notice and any issues arising 
after publication of this notice that require emergency action under 
section 305(c) of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and 
Management Act, provided the public has been notified of the Council's 
intent to take final action to address the emergency.

Special Accommodations

    This meeting is physically accessible to people with disabilities. 
Requests for sign language interpretation or other auxiliary aids 
should be directed to Paul J. Howard, Executive Director, at (978) 465-
0492, at least 5 days prior to the meeting date.

    Authority:  16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.

    Dated: December 13, 2010.
Tracey L. Thompson,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine 
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2010-31606 Filed 12-15-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P
# THE STATE OF TEXAS

M A N D A T E

*********************************************

TO THE 402ND DISTRIC T COURT OF WOOD COUN TY, GREETING:

Before our Court of Appeals for the 12th Court of Appeals District of Texas, on the 31st

day of July, 2015 , the cause u pon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between

IN THE INTEREST OF A . B., A CHILD

NO. 12

- 15

- 00037

- CV; Trial Court No. 2014

- 096

By per curiam opinion.

was determined; and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

“ THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record and brief filed herein, and the

same being considered, it is the opinion of this court that there was no error in the judgment.

It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that the judgment of the court

below be in all things affirmed , and that this decision be certified to the court below for

observance. ”

WHEREAS, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of Appeals

for the Twelfth Court of Appeals District of Texas in this behalf, and in all things have it duly

recognized, obeyed, and executed.

WITNESS, THE HONORABLE JAMES T. WORTHEN , Chief Justice of our Court

of Appeals for the Twelfth Court of Appeals District, with the Seal thereof affixed, at the City of

Tyler, this the 9 th day of October , 2015.

PAM ESTES , CLERK

By:

_______________________________ Chief Deputy Clerk
###### Editorial Note on Part 94

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 94 appear at 61 FR 51352, Oct. 2 1996.

#### § 94.5 Charges for laboratory service.

The costs for analysis of mandatory egg product samples at Science and Technology Division laboratories shall be paid by annually appropriated and designated funds allocated to the egg products inspection program. The costs for any other mandatory laboratory analyses and testing of an egg product's identity and condition, necessitated by the Egg Products Inspection Act, shall also be paid by such program funding.
2007-1812.

#### State v. Harris.

Hamilton App. No. C-060587. On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion granted.

Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, and O’Donnell, JJ., dissent.
```

[109th Congress Public Law 298]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ298.109]

[[Page 120 STAT. 1472]]

Public Law 109-298
109th Congress

                                 An Act

 
      To extend the deadline for commencement of construction of a 
     hydroelectric project in the State of Wyoming. <<NOTE: Oct. 5, 
                           2006 -  [S. 244]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF TIME FOR THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY 
            COMMISSION HYDROELECTRIC PROJECT.

    Notwithstanding the time period specified in section 13 of the 
Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 806) that would otherwise apply to the 
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission project numbered 1651, the 
Commission may, at the request of the licensee for the project, and 
after reasonable notice, in accordance with the good faith, due 
diligence, and public interest requirements of that section and the 
Commission's procedures under that section, extend the time period 
during which the licensee is required to commence the construction of 
the project for 3 consecutive 2-year periods from the date of the 
expiration of the extension originally issued by the Commission.

    Approved October 5, 2006.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--S. 244:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 109-682 (Comm. on Energy and Commerce).
SENATE REPORTS: No. 109-32 (Comm. on Energy and Natural Resources).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD:
                                                        Vol. 151 (2005):
                                    July 26, considered and passed 
                                        Senate.
                                                        Vol. 152 (2006):
                                    Sept. 26, considered and passed 
                                        House.

                                  <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000760386
<NAME> WELLESLEY III-D FDS 9/30/96
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                         326,734
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  192,382
<ALLOWANCES>                                    43,059
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               477,933
<PP&E>                                       5,976,472
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,015,610
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,438,795
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          167,063
<BONDS>                                        521,373
<COMMON>                                     8,988,039
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                 (7,237,680)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,438,795
<SALES>                                      1,158,972
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,404,473
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   96,530
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,077,321
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                14,611
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              38,135
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                177,876
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            177,876
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   177,876
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     6.76
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
1034.004 Acquisition strategy.       (a) A program manager's acquisition strategy written at the system or investment level in accordance with FAR 7.103(e) shall include at a minimum:          (1) The relationship of each individual acquisition (Contract, Delivery Order, Task Order, or Interagency Agreement) to the overall investment requirements and management structure;          (2) What work is being performed in-house (by government personnel) versus contracted out for the investment;          (3) A description of the effort, by acquisition, and the plans to include required clauses in the acquisitions;          (4) A timetable of major acquisition award and administration activities, including plans for contract transitions;          (5) An investment/system surveillance plan;          (6) Financial and human resource requirements to manage the acquisition processes through the investment lifecycle;          (7) Consideration of optimal contract types, including considerations of performance based approaches, small business utilization, Section 508, etc.; and          (8) Assurances that the acquisition strategy section and supporting acquisition plans will maximize competition, including enabling downstream competition through avoidance of vendor “lock in”.          (b) The acquisition strategy shall be approved by a chartered interdisciplinary acquisition team that includes a representative of the procurement organization designated in accordance with bureau procedures.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 1034.0 - General
46.000 Scope of Part.

The Military Departments provide Depot Level Repairable (DLR) quality requirements. The Military

Departments report and track item deficiencies for DLR supplies. Any associated provisions and

clauses shall follow the Military Departments procedures for DLR supplies.

Parent topic: PART 46 – QUALITY ASSURANCE
Case 2:06-cr-00200-WHA-CSC Document 15 Filed 07/19/2006 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          42,925
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,572
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  4,750,053
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                          21,843
<DEPRECIATION>                                (17,129)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,813,786
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          387,922
<BONDS>                                      1,499,639
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,912,083
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,813,786
<SALES>                                      1,980,531
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,980,531
<CGS>                                          892,963
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  892,963
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               511,942
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              33,434
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                542,192
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            542,192
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   542,192
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Case 2:06-cv-00790-WC Document 3 Filed 09/26/2006 Page 1 of 1
IV 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1087 

Designating Room H–139 of the Capitol as the ‘‘Henry J. Hyde Room’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

NOVEMBER 15, 2006 

Mr. PENCE (for himself, Mr. LANTOS, Ms. BERKLEY, Mr. BERMAN, Mr. 

BOOZMAN, Mr. BURTON of Indiana, Mr. CHABOT, Mr. CROWLEY, Mr. 

DELAHUNT, Mr. FALEOMAVAEGA, Mr. FLAKE, Mr. FORTENBERRY, Mr. 

GALLEGLY, Mr. GREEN of Wisconsin, Ms. HARRIS, Mr. ISSA, Mr. KING

of New York, Mr. LEACH, Mr. MACK, Mr. MCCAUL of Texas, Ms. 

MCCOLLUM of Minnesota, Mr. MCCOTTER, Mr. POE, Mr. ROHRABACHER, Ms. ROS-LEHTINEN, Mr. ROYCE, Mr. SMITH of Washington, 

Mr. SMITH of New Jersey, Mr. TANCREDO, Ms. WATSON, Mr. WILSON

of South Carolina, Mr. EVANS, Mr. KIRK, Mr. LIPINSKI, Mr. MANZULLO, 

Mr. SHAYS, and Ms. WASSERMAN SCHULTZ) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

RESOLUTION 

Designating Room H–139 of the Capitol as the ‘‘Henry 

J. Hyde Room’’. 

1 Resolved, That— 

2 (1) Room H–139 of the Capitol shall be known 

3 and designated as the ‘‘Henry J. Hyde Room’’; and 

4 (2) this resolution shall take effect on the day 

5 following the date on which Henry J. Hyde is no 


jcorcoran on PRODPC62 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1087 IH 

1 longer serving as a Member of the House of Rep2 resentatives. 

Æ 


jcorcoran on PRODPC62 with BILLS
- page 1
- page 2
- page 3
- page 4
- page 5
- page 6
- page 7
- page 8
- page 9
- page 10
- page 11
- page 12
- page 13
- page 14
#### § 218.43 Injunctions.

Whenever it appears to the DOE that any firm has engaged, is engaging, or is about to engage in any act or practice constituting a violation of any regulation or order issued under this part 218, the DOE may request the Attorney General to bring a civil action in the appropriate district court of the United States to enjoin such acts or practices and, upon a proper showing, a temporary restraining order or a preliminary or permanent injunction shall be granted without bond. The relief sought may include a mandatory injunction commanding any firm to comply with any provision of such order or regulation, the violation of which is prohibited by section 524 of the EPCA.
Case 1:06-cv-00774-MHT-SRW Document 1 Filed 08/28/2006 Page 1 of 8
Case 1:06-cv-00774-MHT-SRW Document 1 Filed 08/28/2006 Page 2 of 8
Case 1:06-cv-00774-MHT-SRW Document 1 Filed 08/28/2006 Page 3 of 8
Case 1:06-cv-00774-MHT-SRW Document 1 Filed 08/28/2006 Page 4 of 8
Case 1:06-cv-00774-MHT-SRW Document 1 Filed 08/28/2006 Page 5 of 8
Case 1:06-cv-00774-MHT-SRW Document 1 Filed 08/28/2006 Page 6 of 8
Case 1:06-cv-00774-MHT-SRW Document 1 Filed 08/28/2006 Page 7 of 8
Case 1:06-cv-00774-MHT-SRW Document 1 Filed 08/28/2006 Page 8 of 8
Case 1:06-cv-00774-MHT-SRW Document 1-2 Filed 08/28/2006 Page 1 of 5
Case 1:06-cv-00774-MHT-SRW Document 1-2 Filed 08/28/2006 Page 2 of 5
Case 1:06-cv-00774-MHT-SRW Document 1-2 Filed 08/28/2006 Page 3 of 5
Case 1:06-cv-00774-MHT-SRW Document 1-2 Filed 08/28/2006 Page 4 of 5
Case 1:06-cv-00774-MHT-SRW Document 1-2 Filed 08/28/2006 Page 5 of 5
Case 2:06-cr-00198-WKW-CSC Document 43 Filed 12/28/2006 Page 1 of 1
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION

CALVIN FLUKER, et al., )

)

Plaintiffs, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

v. ) 2:06cv785-MHT

) 

U.S. FOODSERVICE, INC., )

and U.S. FOODSERVICE, )

INC.- MONTGOMERY DIVISION, )

)

Defendant. )

 ORDER

It is ORDERED that the motion to extend deadline

(Doc. No. 5) is granted.

DONE, this the 27th day of October, 2006.

 /s/ Myron H. Thompson 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00785-MHT-WC Document 6 Filed 09/27/2006 Page 1 of 1
§ 11.30 Violations. ( a ) The Commission may obtain an injunction or other court order to prevent a violation of the provisions of— ( 1 ) The Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended;
( 2 ) Title II of the Energy Reorganization Act of 1974, as amended; or
( 3 ) A regulation or order issued pursuant to those Acts.
( b ) The Commission may obtain a court order for the payment of a civil penalty imposed under section 234 of the Atomic Energy Act: ( 1 ) For violations of— ( i ) Sections 53, 57, 62, 63, 81, 82, 101, 103, 104, 107, or 109 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended;
( ii ) Section 206 of the Energy Reorganization Act;
( iii ) Any rule, regulation, or order issued pursuant to the sections specified in paragraph (b)(1)(i) of this section;
( iv ) Any term, condition, or limitation of any license issued under the sections specified in paragraph (b)(1)(i) of this section.
( 2 ) For any violation for which a license may be revoked under section 186 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended.
[57 FR 55070, Nov. 24, 1992]