alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV 

House Calendar No. 68 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 386 

[Report No. 109–186] 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 3045) to implement the 

Dominican Republic-Central America-United States Free Trade Agreement. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 26, 2005 

Mr. DREIER, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; 

which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 3045) to implement the Dominican Republic-Central America-United 

States Free Trade Agreement. 

1 Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution 

2 it shall be in order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 

3 3045) to implement the Dominican Republic-Central 

4 America-United States Free Trade Agreement. All points 

5 of order against the bill and against its consideration are 

6 waived. The bill shall be considered as read. The bill shall 

7 be debatable for two hours equally divided and controlled 
2 

HRES 386 RH 

1 by the chairman and ranking minority member of the 

2 Committee on Ways and Means. Pursuant to section 151 

3 of the Trade Act of 1974, the previous question shall be 

4 considered as ordered on the bill to final passage without 

5 intervening motion. 

6 SEC. 2. During consideration of H.R. 3045 pursuant 

7 to this resolution, notwithstanding the operation of the 

8 previous question, the Chair may postpone further consid9 eration of the bill to a time designated by the Speaker 

10 in consonance with section 151 of the Trade Act of 1974. 

11 SEC. 3. A motion to proceed to consideration of H.R. 

12 3045 pursuant to section 151 of the Trade Act of 1974 

13 shall be in order only if offered by the Majority Leader 

14 or his designee. 

House Calendar No. 68 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 386 

[Report No. 109–186] 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 3045) 

America-United States Free Trade Agreement. to implement the Dominican Republic-Central 

JULY 26, 2005 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed
PGI 215.407-4 Should-cost review.       (b) *Program should-cost review*.          (2) DoD contracting activities should consider performing a program should-cost review before award of a definitive contract for a major system as defined by DoDI 5000.2. See DoDI 5000.2 regarding industry participation.          (c) *Overhead should-cost review*.          (1) Contact the Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA) (http://www.dcma.mil/) for questions on overhead should-cost analysis.          (2)(A) DCMA or the military department responsible for performing contract administration functions (e.g., Navy SUPSHIP) should consider, based on risk assessment, performing an overhead should-cost review of a contractor business unit (as defined in FAR 2.101) when all of the following conditions exist:          (*1*) Projected annual sales to DoD exceed $1 billion;          (*2*) Projected DoD versus total business exceeds 30 percent;          (*3*) Level of sole-source DoD contracts is high;          (*4*) Significant volume of proposal activity is anticipated;          (*5*) Production or development of a major weapon system or program is anticipated; and          (*6*) Contractor cost control/reduction initiatives appear inadequate.          (B) The head of the contracting activity may request an overhead should-cost review for a business unit that does not meet the criteria in paragraph (c)(2)(A) of this subsection.          (C) Overhead should-cost reviews are labor intensive. These reviews generally involve participation by the contracting, contract administration, and contract audit elements. The extent of availability of military department, contract administration, and contract audit resources to support DCMA-led teams should be considered when determining whether a review will be conducted. Overhead should-cost reviews generally should not be conducted at a contractor business segment more frequently than every 3 years.    **Parent topic:** PGI 215.407 RESERVED
#### § 12.109 Decisionmaking authority.

Unless otherwise ordered by the Commission in a particular proceeding, each application under this part shall be assigned for decision to the official or decisionmaking body that entered the decision in the adversary adjudication. That official or decisionmaking body is referred to in this part as the “adjudicative officer.”
§ 215.3 Supply reports. ( a ) Any person having the right to lift for export by virtue of any equity interest, reimbursement for services, exchange or purchase, from any country, from fields actually in production, (1) an average of 150,000 barrels per day or more of crude oil for a period of at least one year, or (2) a total of 55,000,000 barrels of crude oil for a period of less than one year, or (3) a total of 150,000,000 barrels of crude oil for the period specified in the agreement, pursuant to supply arrangements with the host government, shall report the following information. ( 1 ) Parties (including partners and percentage interest, where applicable).
( 2 ) Grade or grades available; loading terminal or terminals.
( 3 ) Government imposed production limits, if any.
( 4 ) Minimum lifting obligation and maximum lifting rights.
( 5 ) Details of lifting options within the above limits.
( 6 ) Expiration and renegotiation dates.
( 7 ) Price terms including terms of rebates, discounts, and number of days of credit calculated from the date of loading.
( 8 ) Other payments to or interests retained by the host government (i.e. taxes, royalties, and any other payment to the host government) expressed in terms of the applicable rates or payment or preemption terms, or the base to which those rates or terms are applied.
( 9 ) Related service or other fees and cost of providing services.
( 10 ) Restrictions on shipping or disposition.
( 11 ) Other material contract terms.
( b ) Reports under this section shall be made no later than (1) 60 days after final issuance of reporting forms implementing this regulation, as announced in the Federal Register, (2) fourteen days after the date when supply arrangements are entered into, or (3) fourteen days after the initial lifting under an agreement in which the parties have tentatively concurred but not signed, whichever occurs first. Reporting shall be based on actual practice between the parties. Material changes in any item which must be reported pursuant to this section shall be reported no later than 30 days after a person receives actual notice of such changes.
( c ) Where reports under this section by each participant in a joint operation would be impracticable, or would result in the submission of inaccurate or misleading information, the participants acting together may designate a single participant to report on any of the rights, obligations, or limitations affecting the operation as a whole. Any such designation shall be signed by a duly authorized representative of each participant, and shall specify: ( 1 ) The precise rights, obligations, or limitations to be covered by the designation; and
( 2 ) The reasons for the designation. Such designations shall be submitted to the Assistant Administrator for International Energy Affairs, and shall take effect only upon his written approval, which may at any time be revoked.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

PATRICIA BURKETT, Administratrix of the )

Estate of JEREMY BURKETT, deceased, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) 1:06-CV-00775-DRB

v. )

)

TIMOTHY EUGENE McCRAY and )

S. E. LUMBER COMPANY, )

)

Defendants. )

)

ORDER

Upon review of the Motion for Leave to File Third Party Complaint, filed by Defendant

Timothy McCray (Doc. 6, September 13, 2006), it is, for good cause, 

ORDERED that Plaintiff respond by September 22, 2006, to show any cause why the Motion

should not be granted. 

Done this 14 day of September, 2006. th

/s/ Delores R. Boyd

DELORES R. BOYD

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00775-TFM Document 7 Filed 09/14/2006 Page 1 of 1
§ 987.172 Adjustment of assessment obligation, and late payment and interest charges. ( a ) In accordance with §§ 987.45 and 987.72, the assessment obligation of FP dates shall be based on the weight of the dates at the time of inspection and certification. However, if such dates are subsequently processed and packed within the area of production, the assessment obligation shall be adjusted to reflect any increase in weight and the obligation shall be placed on the handler agreeing to assume it.
( b ) Pursuant to § 987.72, the committee shall impose an interest charge on any handler whose assessment payment has not been received in the committee's office, or the envelope containing the payment legibly postmarked by the U.S. Postal Service, within 60 days of the invoice date shown on the handler's statement. The interest charge shall be a rate of one and one-half percent per month, and shall be applied to the unpaid assessment balance for the number of days all or any part of the unpaid balance is delinquent beyond the 60-day payment period.
( c ) In addition to the interest charge specified in paragraph (b) of this section, the committee shall impose a late payment charge on any handler whose payment has not been received in the committee's office, or the envelope containing the payment legibly postmarked by the U.S. Postal Service, within 60 days of the invoice date. The late payment charge shall be 10 percent of the unpaid balance.
[43 FR 28439, June 30, 1978, as amended at 79 FR 41417, July 16, 2014; 88 FR 82236, Nov. 24, 2023]
Editorial Note on Part 26
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 26 appear at 87 FR 71455, Nov. 22, 2022.

§ 26.821 Inspections. ( a ) Each licensee and other entity who is subject to this part shall permit duly authorized NRC representatives to inspect, copy, or take away copies of its records and to inspect its premises, activities, and personnel as may be necessary to accomplish the purposes of this part.
( b ) Written agreements between licensees or other entities and their C/Vs must clearly show that— ( 1 ) The licensee or other entity is responsible to the NRC for maintaining an effective FFD program under this part; and
( 2 ) Duly authorized NRC representatives may inspect, copy, or take away copies of any licensee's, other entity's, or C/V's documents, records, and reports related to implementation of the licensee's or other entity's FFD program under the scope of the contracted activities.
#### § 205.306 Authorization not exclusive.

No authorization granted pursuant to section 202(e) of the Act shall be deemed to prevent an authorization from being granted to any other person or entity to export electric energy or to prevent any other person or entity from making application for an export authorization.
#### § 981.35 Alternates.

An alternate for a member for the Board shall act in the place and stead of such member (a) in his absence, or (b) in the event of his death, removal, resignation or disqualification, until a successor for his unexpired term has been selected and has qualified.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Frank Barnes, Appellant.

[814 NYS2d 162]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Leslie Crocker Snyder, J.), rendered January 14, 2003, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of murder in the second degree (two counts), and sentencing him to concurrent terms of 25 years to life, and order, same court (John Cataldo, J.), entered on or about June 20, 2005, which denied defendant’s motion to vacate his conviction pursuant to CPL 440.10, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was not against the weight of the evidence. There is no basis for disturbing the jury’s determinations concerning credibility *(see People v Gaimari,*176 NY 84, 94 [1903]). Defendant was connected to the crime by two independent witnesses.

There was no violation of *Brady v Maryland*(373 US 83 [1963]) with regard to a knife that was recovered in a window box of the building where the victim was fatally stabbed, since the knife had no exculpatory value. The knife was recovered three weeks after the murder and the People sufficiently established that the knife was not present when the building was searched immediately after the crime. Furthermore, the forensic and medical evidence showed that the subsequently recovered knife could not have been the murder weapon. In any event, even if the information about the knife had been disclosed, there was no reasonable possibility that it would have affected the verdict *(People v Vilardi,*76 NY2d 67, 77 [1990]).

The court properly denied, without a hearing, defendant’s motion to vacate his judgment of conviction on the ground of ineffective assistance of counsel. The record supports the motion court’s detailed findings, and establishes that defendant received effective assistance of counsel under the state and federal standards *(see People v Benevento,*91 NY2d 708, 713-714 [1998]; *see also Strickland v*Washington, 466 US 668 [1984]). Counsel made reasonable strategic decisions not to impeach the two main prosecution witnesses with insignificant or potentially *391explainable prior inconsistent statements. Were we to find that counsel should have used this impeachment material, we would nevertheless find that counsel’s failure to do so did not affect either the fairness or the outcome of the trial *(see People v Hobot,*84 NY2d 1021, 1024 [1995]). Concur—Saxe, J.P., Marlow, Sullivan, Gonzalez and Malone, JJ.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO



SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002



In connection with
the Annual Report of First Internet Bancorp (the “Company"), on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2012
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|/s/
        David B. Becker | 
|--------------------------- | 
|David B. Becker             | 
|Chief Executive Officer     | 
|March 28, 2013              | 
|                            | 
|/s/
        Kay E. Whitaker | 
|Kay E. Whitaker             | 
|Chief Financial Officer     | 
|March 28, 2013              |
#### In the Matter of St. Lawrence County Department of Social Services, on Behalf of Joanne Petrie, Respondent, v Vincent A. Pratt, Appellant.

Submitted November 19, 2007;

decided January 10, 2008

Reported below, 44 AD3d 1125.

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from that portion of the Appellate Division order that affirmed Family Court’s or*1021der settling the record on appeal, dismissed upon the ground that such portion of the order does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied.
Case 3:06-cv-00751-WKW-TFM Document 7 Filed 09/15/2006 Page 1 of 3
Case 3:06-cv-00751-WKW-TFM Document 7 Filed 09/15/2006 Page 2 of 3
Case 3:06-cv-00751-WKW-TFM Document 7 Filed 09/15/2006 Page 3 of 3
806.004-70 Definition.       As used in this part -          *Health-care resources* has the same definition as that provided in 873.102.    **Parent topic:** PART 806 - COMPETITION REQUIREMENTS
. -

**OFFICE OF**  **THE ATTORNEY**  **GENERAL OF**  **TEXAS AUSTIN** 

Hon. C. ii.

Xoaver County Auditor h'aaogdoohea

County Maoogdoohes, Texas War Sir:

of February 14, 1939; in whi of this i)epwtment on whether the Commiaaloners' Co of the seswwor-colle out 

### ,br the Oeneral B doohes county

at the asaekworeives a ealory aa
f Article 3899, i?evieed

, providm iiipart that: d in this act where com?eneation for hie
all reason xpeneee nsoesoary in the propar au& legal oonduot of his Office, premium 

### on 0rriOid~8 **bonds.**

**. .**  **.n.** Paragraph 2 

### or sec. b of 2etiole 38ij9, yrovidsv in part that:

"Xi.1 euoh approved cltitis and'acoounts skill be ljeid

from the Offloer's Saltry Fund**~fon. a.**  **E. Weaver,**  **February** 

### 27, 1939, Pam 2

unlur othehlmo providedhareln." **Th0z-m l&**  **a0 other**  **8tabutory authority**  r0r the ~BYUW& irr

l 

### wh 

### lw or l

### -m. ~hbh OOIW~- tUt0 the l



### ub ran, tha-0p

Ll 

### at Oi YOU? 

### IIQUIX~Uid it 18, thyon or thi8 xhpuam0nt 

### end you arm l 

### o advised thnt the pro&m on tJm bond of the l**umor-oolleotor of**  **kur hall**  

### bo danoarfth Oh8 tbru **and** 

### prorialon8o5"idb l ooor- 

### Artielm 3699, Berind oiril stata*u or 

### Tuu, 1925, out or +A8 **Orfioar ’**  

### m salary **Fund** 

### and noti **out or**  

### the **Gonorm** 

### ROVUW **FUUd**

### Or IOOr 09tllllJ. **Vary truly**  **your8 ATTOmmY** 

**OEwrHAL**

**OF 2x&u**  

### By (s) Lloyd AmWrong

Aasilrknt
Case 2:06-cv-00748-MEF-WC Document 14 Filed 10/04/2006 Page 1 of 1
§ 216.5 Notification of findings. ( a ) DOE will notify DOC if it finds that supplies of materials and equipment, services, or facilities for which an applicant requested assistance are critical and essential to an eligible energy program or project, and in such cases will forward to DOC the application and whatever information or comments DOE believes appropriate. If DOE believes at any time that findings previously made may no longer be valid, it will immediately notify the DOC and the affected applicant(s) and afford such applicant(s) an opportunity to show cause why such findings should not be withdrawn.
( b ) If DOC notifies DOE that DOC has found that supplies of materials and equipment, services, or facilities for which the applicant requested assistance are scarce and that the related eligible energy program or project cannot reasonably be accomplished without exercising the authority specified in DPA section 101(c)(1), DOE will notify the applicant that the applicant is authorized to place rated orders for specific materials and equipment, services, or facilities pursuant to the provisions of the DOC's DPAS regulation.
[73 FR 10984, Feb. 29, 2008]
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

)

In the Matter of the Extradition of )

MARIA DEL ROSARIO MORENO VAZQUEZ, )CV. NO. 3:06cv761-MEF-CSC

a/k/a MARIA COONLEY )

 )

UNITED STATES’ NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF ADDITIONAL COUNSEL

Comes now the United States of America, by and through Leura Garrett Canary, United

States Attorney for the Middle District of Alabama, and hereby notices the appearance of Assistant

United States Attorney Christopher A. Snyder, who will be serving as additional counsel of record

for the United States in this matter. 

 Respectfully submitted this the 24th of March, 2008.

LEURA GARRETT CANARY

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

/s/ Christopher Snyder

CHRISTOPHER A. SNYDER

Assistant United States Attorney

131 Clayton Street

Montgomery, AL 36104

Phone: (334)223-7280

Fax: (334)223-7135

E-mail: christopher.a.snyder@usdoj.gov

Case 3:06-cv-00761-CSC Document 13 Filed 03/24/2008 Page 1 of 2
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

)

In the Matter of the Extradition of )

MARIA del ROSARIO MORENO-VAZQUEZ, ) CV. NO. 3:06cv761-MEF-CSC

a/k/a MARIA COONLEY )

)

Certificate of Service

I hereby certify that on March 24, 2008, I electronically filed the foregoing with

the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system, which will send notification of such

filing to the following: Ben Elton Bruner. 

/s/ Christopher Snyder

CHRISTOPHER A. SNYDER

Case 3:06-cv-00761-CSC Document 13 Filed 03/24/2008 Page 2 of 2
Editorial Note on Part 35
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 35 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

§ 35.92 Decay-in-storage. ( a ) A licensee may hold byproduct material with a physical half-life of less than or equal to 120 days for decay-in-storage before disposal without regard to its radioactivity if it— ( 1 ) Monitors byproduct material at the surface before disposal and determines that its radioactivity cannot be distinguished from the background radiation level with an appropriate radiation detection survey meter set on its most sensitive scale and with no interposed shielding; and
( 2 ) Removes or obliterates all radiation labels, except for radiation labels on materials that are within containers and that will be managed as biomedical waste after they have been released from the licensee.
( b ) A licensee shall retain a record of each disposal permitted under paragraph (a) of this section in accordance with § 35.2092.
[67 FR 20370, Apr. 24, 2002, as amended at 72 FR 45151, Aug. 13, 2007]
PGI 204.1 -CONTRACT EXECUTION

Parent topic: PGI Part 204 - ADMINISTRATIVE AND INFORMATION MATTERS

PGI 204.101 Contracting officer's signature.

(1) Include the contracting officer's telephone number and, when available, e-mail/Internet address

on contracts and modifications.

(2) The contracting officer may sign bilateral modifications of a letter contract before signature by

the contractor.
**EXHIBIT 32.2CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

       In connection with the quarterlyreport of CNB Corporation on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2010 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, L.Ford Sanders, II, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of CNBCorporation, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002that:
| 1.     | The  above-listed Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)  or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                 |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                         |
| 2.     | The  information contained in the above-listed Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all  material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the  Company. |
| Date:  May  10, 2010 | /s/L. Ford Sanders, II                            L. Ford Sanders,  II  Executive Vice President, Treasurer, and  Chief Financial Officer |
|--------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       |