alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 20.2004 Treatment or disposal by incineration. ( a ) A licensee may treat or dispose of licensed material by incineration only: ( 1 ) As authorized by paragraph (b) of this section; or
( 2 ) If the material is in a form and concentration specified in § 20.2005; or
( 3 ) As specifically approved by the Commission pursuant to § 20.2002.
( b ) ( 1 ) Waste oils (petroleum derived or synthetic oils used principally as lubricants, coolants, hydraulic or insulating fluids, or metalworking oils) that have been radioactively contaminated in the course of the operation or maintenance of a nuclear power reactor licensed under part 50 of this chapter may be incinerated on the site where generated provided that the total radioactive effluents from the facility, including the effluents from such incineration, conform to the requirements of appendix I to part 50 of this chapter and the effluent release limits contained in applicable license conditions other than effluent limits specifically related to incineration of waste oil. The licensee shall report any changes or additions to the information supplied under §§ 50.34 and 50.34a of this chapter associated with this incineration pursuant to § 50.71 of this chapter, as appropriate. The licensee shall also follow the procedures of § 50.59 of this chapter with respect to such changes to the facility or procedures.
( 2 ) Solid residues produced in the process of incinerating waste oils must be disposed of as provided by § 20.2001.
( 3 ) The provisions of this section authorize onsite waste oil incineration under the terms of this section and supersede any provision in an individual plant license or technical specification that may be inconsistent.
[57 FR 57656, Dec. 7, 1992]
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. David Rodriguez, Appellant.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme 'Court, Kings County, rendered March 26, 1968, convicting defendant selling as a felony (2 counts), possession of narcotics with intent to sell, as a felony (2 counts), and possession of narcotics, as a misdemeanor (2 counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Judgment affirmed. The proof clearly established defendant’s guilt. While it was error for the court not to admit Marcos Guadalupe’s memo book in evidence (see CPLR 4518), it is our opinion that the error may he disregarded under section 542 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The entries made in the book had no more probative value than Guadalupe’s oral testimony and would not have added any support to defendant’s alibi defense. We have examined defendant’s other contentions and find no grounds *784therein for disturbing the judgment. Beldock, P. J., Christ, Brennan, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.
IV 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 308

Supporting the goals of National Marina Day and urging marinas continue 

providing environmentally friendly gateways to boating. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 8, 2005

Mr. DICKS submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

RESOLUTION

Supporting the goals of National Marina Day and urging 

marinas continue providing environmentally friendly 

gateways to boating.

Whereas the people of the United States highly value their 

recreational time and their ability to access the waterways of the United States, one of the Nation’s greatest 

natural resources; 

Whereas in 1928, the National Association of Engine and 

Boat Manufacturers first used the word ‘‘marina’’ to describe a recreational boating facility; 

Whereas the United States is home to more than 12,000 marinas that contribute substantially to local communities 

by providing safe and reliable gateways to boating; 
2

•HRES 308 IH 

Whereas the marinas of the United States serve as stewards 

of the environment and actively seek to protect the waterways that surround them for the enjoyment of this generation and generations to come; 

Whereas the marinas of the United States provide communities and visitors with a place where friends and families, united by a passion for the water, can come together 

for recreation, rest, and relaxation; and 

Whereas the Marina Operators Association of America has 

designated August 13, 2005 as ‘‘National Marina Day’’ 

to increase awareness among citizens, policymakers, and 

elected officials about the many contributions that marinas make to communities: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

2 (1) supports the goals of National Marina Day; 

3 and 

4 (2) urges that the marinas of the United States 

5 continue to provide environmentally friendly gate6 ways to boating for the people of the United States.

Æ
Exhibit 32.1





Certification of Chief Executive Officer


Pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)





In connection with this Annual Report on Form 10-K (the “Report”) of Harvest Capital Credit Corporation (the “Registrant”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Richard P. Buckanavage, the Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.





/s/ Richard P. BuckanavageName:Richard P. BuckanavageDate:March 15, 2017
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 384 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 384

  Condemning in the strongest terms the terrorist attacks in Sharm el-
        Sheikh, Egypt, on July 23, 2005, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 26, 2005

Mr. Issa (for himself, Mr. Tom Davis of Virginia, Mr. Hyde, Mr. Lantos, 
Ms. Ros-Lehtinen, Mr. Wexler, Mr. Chabot, Mr. Dingell, Mr. Rahall, Mr. 
LaHood, Ms. Ginny Brown-Waite of Florida, Mrs. Miller of Michigan, Mr. 
  Pearce, Mr. McCaul of Texas, Mr. Renzi, Mr. Conaway, Mr. Flake, Mr. 
  Frank of Massachusetts, Mr. Waxman, Mr. Shays, Mr. Cunningham, Mr. 
   Kolbe, Mr. Daniel E. Lungren of California, Mr. Rohrabacher, Mr. 
 Boustany, Mr. Foley, Mr. Jindal, and Mr. Moran of Virginia) submitted 
   the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 
                        International Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Condemning in the strongest terms the terrorist attacks in Sharm el-
        Sheikh, Egypt, on July 23, 2005, and for other purposes.

Whereas on July 23, 2005, a series of explosions at tourist facilities in Sharm 
        el-Sheikh, Egypt, planned and carried out by terrorists, resulted in the 
        death of scores of civilians and the injury of hundreds of others;
Whereas the people of Egypt have been subjected to several other terrorist 
        deadly attacks over the past year;
Whereas Egypt's appointed ambassador to Iraq, Dr. Ihab al-Sherif, was kidnapped 
        and executed by terrorists in Baghdad during July 2005; and
Whereas President George W. Bush expressed the solidarity of the people and 
        Government of the United States with the people and Government of Egypt 
        during his visit to the Embassy of Egypt: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) condemns in the strongest terms the terrorist attacks 
        on Sharm el-Sheikh, Egypt and other terrorist attacks directed 
        against Egypt;
            (2) expresses its condolences to the families and friends 
        of those individuals who were killed in the attacks and 
        expresses its sympathies to those individuals who have been 
        injured;
            (3) joins with President George W. Bush in expressing the 
        solidarity of the people and Government of the United States 
        with the people and Government of Egypt as they recover from 
        these cowardly and inhuman attacks; and
            (4) expresses its readiness to support the Egyptian 
        authorities in their efforts to bring to justice those 
        individuals responsible for the recent attacks in Egypt and to 
        pursue, disrupt, undermine, and dismantle the networks which 
        plan and carry out such attacks.
                                 <all>
```
Employment Arrangement with Richard J. Landy



 Exhibit 10(mm) 
 Richard J. Landy 
 Employment Arrangement 
 On January 4, 2010, Richard J. Landy was hired as the new Executive Vice President for Human Resources of Energy Future Holdings Corp. (the
“Company”). In connection with his employment, the Company entered into an employment arrangement with Mr. Landy. As compensation for his services, Mr. Landy will be paid an annual base salary equal to $450,000 with the ability
to earn an annual cash bonus equal to 65% of his base salary if he achieves certain annual performance targets established by the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”). Such annual cash bonus may be increased to an amount equal
to 200% of his base salary based on achievement of certain superior annual performance targets established by the Board. The Company will also pay Mr. Landy a signing bonus of $100,000; provided that Mr. Landy must repay this amount in
full to the Company in the event that Mr. Landy is terminated or resigns prior to the first anniversary of the effective date of his new employment agreement. The employment arrangement also entitles Mr. Landy to receive other forms of
customary compensation such as certain relocation expenses, health and welfare benefits, certain perquisites and reimbursement of certain business expenses. 
 In addition, Mr. Landy received a grant of 400,000 time-vesting stock options under the 2007 Stock Incentive Plan for Key Employees of Energy Future Holdings Corp. and Affiliates (Stock Option Plan)
at a strike price of $3.50 per share, half of which will vest on July 4, 2011 and the other half of which will vest on January 4, 2013. 
 Mr. Landy’s employment arrangement includes customary non-compete and non-solicitation provisions that generally restrict Mr. Landy’s ability to compete with the Company or solicit its customers or employees for his own
personal benefit during the term of the employment agreement and 18 months after the employment arrangement expires or is terminated.
ex10-1.htm


    Exhibit
10.1

      LOJACK
CORPORATION

      


      LOJACK
CORPORATION AMENDED AND RESTATED

      NONQUALIFIED
DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN

      ______________________________________________

      


      2010
Amendment

      ______________________________________________

      


      WHEREAS, LoJack
Corporation (hereinafter referred to as “Employer”) established the LoJack
Corporation Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan (hereinafter “Plan”) for a
select group of management or highly compensated employees effective as of
January 1, 2005 and amended and restated the Plan effective January 1,
2008;

       

      NOW, THEREFORE,
the Employer hereby further amends the Plan document, effective as of the date
of execution below, as follows:

       

      1.  Bonus Deferral Limitation
Related to Noncash Portion of Bonuses. The following Section 3.1(h) shall
be added to the Plan:

       

      (h)  Prior
to the time any Participant has a legally binding right, within the meaning of
the Treasury Regulations promulgated under Code Section 409A, to a Bonus related
to a specific Plan Year, the Employer shall announce the minimum percentage of
any such Bonus that shall be paid in cash rather than property (the “Minimum
Cash Percentage”).  Notwithstanding Section 3.1(g), no Deferral
Election with respect to a Bonus shall be given effect to the extent it exceeds
the Minimum Cash Percentage for the relevant Plan Year.  The portion
of any Bonus that, absent a Deferral Election, would be paid in the form of
property rather than cash shall, notwithstanding any Deferral Election, be paid
to the Participant directly in such property form and not deferred under this
Plan.

       

      *     *     *     *     *

       

      2.  Further
Amendments.  Except as hereinabove specifically amended, all
provisions of the Plan shall continue in full force and effect; provided,
however, that the Employer hereby reserves the power from time to time to
further amend the Plan.

       

      *     *     *     *     *

       

      IN WITNESS
WHEREOF, the Employer has executed this Amendment on this the 17th  day
of February, 2010.

       

      
        	
                LOJACK
      CORPORATION

              	
                Attested:

              
	 	 
	
                By: /s/ Richard T. Riley
       

              	
                By: /s/ Timothy P.
      O'Connor  

              
	
                Title:
      Executive Chairman

              	
                Title:
      Senior Vice President and 

                Chief
      Financial Officer
iii

Note to Readers

Fellow Citizens:

In the late summer of 2005, millions of us watched the satellite images of Hurricane 

Katrina as it moved through the Gulf of Mexico and drove menacing swells of water 

toward the American coastline.

We watched in sympathy as hundreds of thousands of lives were upended when the 

hurricane struck the coasts of Louisiana, Mississippi, and Alabama. We watched in horror as hundreds died in collapsed or flooded houses and nursing homes.

We were heartened by acts of initiative, perseverance, and heroism by local responders 

and the U.S. Coast Guard but, to add bewilderment and outrage to our sense of tragedy, 

we were horrified when the response to the Katrina catastrophe revealed – all too often, 

and for far too long – confusion, delay, misdirection, inactivity, poor coordination, and 

lack of leadership at all levels of government.

Meanwhile, thousands languished in heat and squalor on islands of concrete highway, 

in darkened stadiums, in nursing homes, or on rooftops, waiting for rescue, sometimes 

dying before help arrived.

All of this unfolded nearly four years after the terror attacks of September 11, 2001; 

after a massive reorganization of federal plans and organizations for disaster response 

and billions of dollars of expenditures; and after a closely observed hurricane struck 

when and where forecasters said it would.

We knew Katrina was coming. How much worse would the nightmare have been if the 

disaster had been unannounced – an earthquake in San Francisco, a burst levee near St. 

Louis or Sacramento, a biological weapon smuggled into Boston Harbor, or a chemicalweapon terror attack in Chicago?

Hurricane Katrina found us – still – a nation unprepared for catastrophe.

The United States Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

has prepared this bipartisan report to acknowledge what was done well, to identify what 

was done poorly or not at all, and to recommend changes in our national system for 

emergency response that will put local, state, federal, and private responders in a better 

position to provide prompt and effective relief when disaster strikes again. The Committee conducted a long and thorough investigation of these issues, and is grateful for 

the work of its staff of investigators, writers, researchers, and other professionals that 

made this report possible.

We hope you find it informative and, above all, useful.

Senator Susan M. Collins Senator Joseph I. Lieberman

Maine, Chairman Connecticut, Ranking Member
PGI 215.402 Pricing policy.

(1) Contracting officers must purchase supplies and services from responsible sources at fair and

reasonable prices. The Truthful Cost and Pricing statute (10 U.S.C. chapter 271 and 41 U.S.C.

chapter 35) requires offerors to submit certified cost or pricing data if a procurement exceeds the

Truthful Cost and Pricing threshold and none of the exceptions to certified cost or pricing data

requirements applies. Under the Truthful Cost and Pricing statute, the contracting officer obtains

accurate, complete, and current data from offerors to establish a fair and reasonable price (see FAR

15.403). The Truthful Cost and Pricing statute also allows for a price adjustment remedy if it is later

found that a contractor did not provide accurate, complete, and current data.

(2) When certified cost or pricing data are not required, and the contracting officer does not have

sufficient data to determine price reasonableness, FAR 15.402(a)(2) requires the offeror to provide

whatever data the contracting officer needs in order to determine fair and reasonable prices.

(3) Obtaining sufficient data from the offeror is particularly critical in situations where an item is

determined to be a commercial product or service in accordance with FAR 2.101and the contract is

being awarded on a sole source basis. This includes commercial sales data of products or services

sold in similar quantities and, if such data is insufficient, cost data to support the proposed price.

(4) See PGI 215.404-1 and the Department of Defense Guidebook for Acquiring Commercial Items,

Part B: Pricing Commercial Items , for more detailed procedures and guidance on obtaining data

needed to determine fair and reasonable prices.

Parent topic: PGI 215.4 - CONTRACT PRICING
IV 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 216 

To honor the late playwright Arthur Miller and the University of Michigan 

for its intention of building a theatre in his name. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 14, 2005 

Mr. SCHWARZ of Michigan (for himself, Mr. DINGELL, Mr. FORD, Mr. KILDEE, Mr. CONYERS, Mr. EHLERS, Ms. KAPTUR, Mr. LEVIN, Mr. PRICE

of Georgia, and Mr. UPTON) submitted the following resolution; which 

was referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce 

RESOLUTION 

To honor the late playwright Arthur Miller and the University of Michigan for its intention of building a theatre 

in his name. 

Whereas Arthur Miller was considered a legend during the 

vaulted period known as Broadway’s Golden Age, earning 

him a celebrity status that few playwrights would ever realize; 

Whereas, as noted upon his death by The Michigan Daily, the 

student newspaper where Arthur Miller honed his writing, Miller was twice denied admission to the University 

of Michigan, and gained admittance only after appealing 

directly to the Dean; 
2 

•HRES 216 IH 

Whereas in 1949, at the age of 33, with his play ‘‘The Death 

of a Salesman’’, Arthur Miller seized all major drama 

awards for the year—the Pulitzer Prize, the Tony, and 

the New York Drama Critics Award; 

Whereas Arthur Miller’s plays, books, essays, and articles 

touched the moral fabric of a nation; 

Whereas, according to Robert Falls, Artistic Director of Chicago’s Goodman Theatre, ‘‘Probably not a day goes by 

that, somewhere in the world, one of Miller’s plays isn’t 

being performed’’; 

Whereas during his extraordinary life and career, Arthur Miller tapped a social conscience that will see his work live 

as long as there is an American Theatre; 

Whereas his courageous response to the McCarthy era witchhunts of the 1950’s was ‘‘The Crucible’’, where his carefully tailored character John Proctor refused to name 

names and ultimately died for his convictions; 

Whereas Arthur Miller’s success did not come easy and was 

borne of hard work and an uncanny ability to translate 

the human condition on to the American stage; and 

Whereas Arthur Miller’s first plays were written at the University of Michigan and earned him two Avery Hopwood 

awards which enabled him to complete his education, that 

same University now prepares to honor his memory with 

the Arthur Miller Theatre: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) recognizes the extraordinary contributions 

3 to American literature and American theatre of Ar4 thur Miller; 
3 

•HRES 216 IH 

1 (2) honors Arthur Miller as a great American 

2 and pioneer in the annals of American history; and 

3 (3) commends the University of Michigan for 

4 its commitment to build the Arthur Miller Theatre, 

5 a fitting monument to one of its most distinguished 

6 alumna. 

Æ
§ 221.31 Requests by DOD. ( a ) When DOD finds that ( 1 ) a fuel supply shortage for DOD exists or is anticipated which would have a substantial negative impact on the national defense, and
( 2 ) the defense activity for which fuel is required cannot be postponed until after the fuel supply shortage is likely to terminate, DOD may submit a written request to ERA for the issuance to it of a priority rating for the supply of crude oil and petroleum products.
( b ) Not later than the transmittal date of its request to ERA, DOD shall notify the Federal Emergency Management Agency that it has requested a priority rating from ERA.
( c ) Requests from DOD shall set forth the following: ( 1 ) The quantity and quality of crude oil or petroleum products determined by DOD to be required to meet national defense requirements;
( 2 ) The required delivery dates;
( 3 ) The defense-related activity and the supply location for which the crude oil or petroleum product is to be delivered;
( 4 ) The current or most recent suppliers of the crude oil or petroleum product and the reasons, if known, why the suppliers will not supply the requested crude oil or petroleum product;
( 5 ) The degree to which it is feasible for DOD to use an alternate product in lieu of that requested and, if such an alternative product can be used, the efforts which have been made to obtain the alternate product;
( 6 ) The period during which the shortage of crude oil or petroleum products is expected to exist;
( 7 ) The proposed supply source for the additional crude oil or petroleum products required, which shall, if practicable, be the historical supplier of such crude oil or product to DOD; and
( 8 ) Certification that DOD has made each of the findings required by paragraph (a) of this section.
September 17, 2014

Docket Management Facility United States Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Room W12

- 140 Washington, DC 20590

Re : Sport Pilot CFI Training in Powered Parachute and Weight Shift Control Aircraft to Private

Pilot S tandards, Docket Number FAA

- 2006

- 24262, Exemption 8828C

To Whom It May Concern:

EAA (the Experimental Aircraft Association) is the world leader in recreational aviation. With an international membership of more than 180,000 people in more than 100 nation s, EAA brings together pilots, aircraft owners, and aviation enthusiasts who are dedicated to sharing the Spirit of Aviation by promoting the continued growth of aviation, the preservation of its history and a

commitment to aviation’s future.

EAA requests an extension to Exemption 8828C, which is an exemption from § 61.415(b)(1) of

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations. This exemption allows members of EAA who are certificated flight instructors with a sport pilot rating to provide ground training, flight training, and logbook endorsements for a private pilot certificate with a powered parachute or weight

shift

- control aircraft rating without holding the applicable category and class rating on at least a private pilot certificate.

There has been no change in the conditions and reasons relative to public interest and safety that were the basis of g ranting the origin al exemption. Therefore, EAA requests that this exemption be extended two years to January 31, 2017.

Please do not hesitate to contact me with any questions regarding EAA ’ s request.

Respectfully Submitted,

Jonathan Harger

Government Ad vocacy Specialist