alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Nathaniel L. Stephens, Appellant.

Appeals by defendant from (1) a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County, rendered November 22, 1963, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, grand larceny in the second degree, and assault in the second degree (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence; and. (2) an order of the same court, dated June 21, 1968, which, after a hearing, held defendant’s confession to have been voluntarily made. By prior decision of this court, upon the appeal from the judgment, the above-mentioned hearing *830was ordered and the appeal from the judgment was held in abeyance pending the hearing *(People*v. *Stephens,*27 A D 2d 945). Judgment reversed, on the law, the facts, in the exercise of discretion and in the interests of justice, and case remanded to the County Court for a new trial. Order affirmed. Defendant was jointly tried and convicted, before a jury, with two eodefendants, Campbell and Carpenter. Each had given a statement to the police in which he admitted his own guilt and also implicated the others, and all three confessions were received into evidence. Defendant did not take the stand but produced one witness; Campbell took the stand and produced witnesses; and Carpenter neither took the stand nor offered witnesses in his behalf. On appeal by Campbell in a *'coram nobis*proceeding this court held his statement to have been improperly obtained, and vacated his judgment of conviction *(People*v. *Campbell,*28 A D 2d 735). Although prior thereto Carpenter’s judgment of conviction and an order holding his confession voluntary, after a *Huntley*hearing, had been affirmed *(People*v. *Carpenter,*26 A D 2d 773), this court is presently holding, in a subsequent *coram nobis*proceeding by him based on the claim that he had been denied a fair trial because of the receipt into evidence of codefendant Campbell’s improperly obtained confession which implicated him, that fair procedure requires granting him a new trial in the interests of justice *(People*v. *Carpenterr*32 A D 2d 827). For the same reasons therein expressed, we now hold that defendant Stephens is similarly entitled to a new trial, there being no substantial distinction between him and Carpenter *(People*v. *Carpenter, supra; People*v. *Burd,*22 N Y 2d 653). Christ, Acting P. J., Benjamin, Munder, Martuscello and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.
`[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 394 Reported in House (RH)]







                                                  House Calendar No. 76
109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 394

                          [Report No. 109-200]

Waiving points of order against consideration of the conference report 
   to accompany the bill (H.R. 6) to ensure jobs for our future with 
                secure, affordable, and reliable energy.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 27, 2005

 Mr. Hastings of Washington, from the Committee on Rules, reported the 
  following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and 
                         ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION


 
Waiving points of order against consideration of the conference report 
   to accompany the bill (H.R. 6) to ensure jobs for our future with 
                secure, affordable, and reliable energy.

    Resolved,  That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in 
order to consider the conference report to accompany the bill (H.R. 6) 
to ensure jobs for our future with secure, affordable, and reliable 
energy. All points of order against the conference report and against 
its consideration are waived. The conference report shall be considered 
as read.




                                                  House Calendar No. 76

109th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                              H. RES. 394

                          [Report No. 109-200]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

Waiving points of order against consideration of the conference report 
   to accompany the bill (H.R. 6) to ensure jobs for our future with 
                secure, affordable, and reliable energy.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             July 27, 2005

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed`
3031.205-32 Precontract costs.       (a) The decision to incur precontract costs is that of the contractor. DHS employees may not authorize, demand, or require a contractor to incur precontract costs. The contracting officer must advise the prospective contractor that any costs incurred before contract award are incurred at the contractor's sole risk and that if negotiations fail to result in a binding contract, payment of these costs will not be made by the Government. See (HSAR) 48 CFR 3031.205–32(b) regarding exception due to reconciliation of costs.          (b) When the contracting officer determines that incurring precontract costs was necessary to meet the proposed contract delivery schedule of a cost-reimbursement contract, the clause at (HSAR) 48 CFR 3052.231–70, Precontract Costs, may be inserted in the resultant contract.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 3031.2—Contracts with Commercial Organizations
2007-1779.

#### Sharpe v. Wolfe.

In Habeas Corpus. On petition for writ of habeas corpus of Jeffrey Sharpe. Sua sponte, cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.
###### Editorial Note on Part 40

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 40 appear at 79 FR 75740, Dec. 19, 2014.

#### § 40.45 Commission action on applications to renew or amend.

In considering an application by a licensee to renew or amend his license the Commission will apply the applicable criteria set forth in § 40.32.

[26 FR 284, Jan. 14, 1961, as amended at 43 FR 6924, Feb. 17, 1978]
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 462 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 462

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                    September 28, 2005.
    Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker 
may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XVIII, declare the House resolved into the 
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of the 
bill (H.R. 3402) to authorize appropriations for the Department of Justice for 
fiscal years 2006 through 2009, and for other purposes. The first reading of the 
bill shall be dispensed with. All points of order against consideration of the 
bill are waived. General debate shall be confined to the bill and shall not 
exceed one hour equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking 
minority member of the Committee on the Judiciary. After general debate the bill 
shall be considered for amendment under the five-minute rule. It shall be in 
order to consider as an original bill for the purpose of amendment under the 
five-minute rule the amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the 
Committee on the Judiciary now printed in the bill. The committee amendment in 
the nature of a substitute shall be considered as read. All points of order 
against the committee amendment in the nature of a substitute are waived. 
Notwithstanding clause 11 of rule XVIII, no amendment to the committee amendment 
in the nature of a substitute shall be in order except those printed in the 
report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution. Each such 
amendment may be offered only in the order printed in the report, may be offered 
only by a Member designated in the report, shall be considered as read, shall be 
debatable for the time specified in the report equally divided and controlled by 
the proponent and an opponent, shall not be subject to amendment, and shall not 
be subject to a demand for division of the question in the House or in the 
Committee of the Whole. All points of order against such amendments are waived. 
At the conclusion of consideration of the bill for amendment the Committee shall 
rise and report the bill to the House with such amendments as may have been 
adopted. Any Member may demand a separate vote in the House on any amendment 
adopted in the Committee of the Whole to the bill or to the committee amendment 
in the nature of a substitute. The previous question shall be considered as 
ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to final passage without intervening 
motion except one motion to recommit with or without instructions.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 951 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 951

     To extend the deadline for commencement of construction of a 
                         hydroelectric project.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 7, 2017

   Ms. Foxx introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To extend the deadline for commencement of construction of a 
                         hydroelectric project.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding the time period specified in 
section 13 of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 806) that would 
otherwise apply to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission project 
numbered 12642, the Commission may, at the request of the licensee for 
the project, and after reasonable notice, in accordance with the good 
faith, due diligence, and public interest requirements of that section 
and the Commission's procedures under that section, extend the time 
period during which the licensee is required to commence the 
construction of the project for up to 3 consecutive 2-year periods from 
the date of the expiration of the extension originally issued by the 
Commission.
    (b) Reinstatement of Expired License.--If the period required for 
commencement of construction of the project described in subsection (a) 
has expired prior to the date of the enactment of this Act, the 
Commission may reinstate the license effective as of the date of its 
expiration and the first extension authorized under subsection (a) 
shall take effect on the date of such expiration.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32








Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350


(Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)





Securities and Exchange Commission


100 F Street, N.E.


Washington, D.C. 20549





In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Gulf Coast Ultra Deep Royalty Trust (the “Trust”) for the year ended December 31, 2021, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, not in its individual capacity but solely as the trustee of the Trust, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of its knowledge:





(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition, distributable income and changes in trust corpus of the Trust.











Date:  March 22, 2022





/s/ Sarah C. Newell


Sarah C. Newell


Vice President


The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A.,


as Trustee of Gulf Coast Ultra Deep Royalty Trust











The above certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-K or as a separate disclosure document.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 134 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 134

 Requesting the President to transmit to the House of Representatives 
 certain information relating to plan assets and liabilities of single-
                        employer pension plans.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 2, 2005

  Mr. George Miller of California submitted the following resolution; 
   which was referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Requesting the President to transmit to the House of Representatives 
 certain information relating to plan assets and liabilities of single-
                        employer pension plans.

    Resolved,  That the President is hereby requested to transmit to 
the House of Representatives, not later than 14 days after the date of 
the adoption of this resolution, copies of all information in his 
possession relating to the 2 most recent plan years of single-employer 
pension plans preceding the date of the adoption of this resolution, 
consisting of--
            (1) information described in paragraphs (1) and (2) of 
        section 4010.8(a) of title 29, Code of Federal Regulations, 
        with respect to such plans, and
            (2) the identity of the contributing sponsors of such 
        plans.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 (AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

In connection with Quarterly Report of Sionix Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David R. Wells, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to my knowledge and in my capacity as an officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and,

2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.

Date: January 13, 2010

| |                                                                                                       
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |                                                                                                       
| |                                                                                                       
| | /s/ David R. Wells                                                                                    
| | David R. Wells                                                                                        
| | President, Chief Financial Officer, Assistant Secretary and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer



A certification furnished pursuant to this Item will not be deemed filed for purposes of section 18 of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78r), or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the registrant specifically incorporates it by reference.















1
§ 431.77 Energy conservation standards and their effective dates. ( a ) *Gas-fired commercial warm air furnaces.* Each gas-fired commercial warm air furnace must meet the following energy efficiency standard levels: ( 1 ) For gas-fired commercial warm air furnaces manufactured starting on January 1, 1994, until January 1, 2023, the TE at the maximum rated capacity (rated maximum input) must be not less than 80 percent; and
( 2 ) For gas-fired commercial warm air furnaces manufactured starting on January 1, 2023, the TE at the maximum rated capacity (rated maximum input) must be not less than 81 percent.
( b ) *Oil-fired commercial warm air furnaces.* Each oil-fired commercial warm air furnace must meet the following energy efficiency standard levels: ( 1 ) For oil-fired commercial warm air furnaces manufactured starting on January 1, 1994, until January 1, 2023, the TE at the maximum rated capacity (rated maximum input) must be not less than 81 percent; and
( 2 ) For oil-fired commercial warm air furnaces manufactured starting on January 1, 2023, the TE at the maximum rated capacity (rated maximum input) must be not less than 82 percent.
[81 FR 2528, Jan. 15, 2016]
PGI 203.1 -SAFEGUARDS

No Current PGI Text.

Parent topic: PGI Part 203 - IMPROPER BUSINESS PRACTICES AND PERSONAL CONFLICTS OF

INTEREST
Case 2:06-cr-00193-MEF-CSC Document 32 Filed 10/17/2006 Page 1 of 1
§ 13.4 Investigation. ( a ) If an investigating official concludes that a subpoena pursuant to the authority conferred by 31 U.S.C. 3804(a) is warranted— ( 1 ) The subpoena so issued shall notify the person to whom it is addressed of the authority under which the subpoena is issued and shall identify the records or documents sought;
( 2 ) The investigating official may designate a person to act on his or her behalf to receive the documents sought; and
( 3 ) The person receiving such subpoena shall be required to tender to the investigating official or the person designated to receive the documents a certification that the documents sought have been produced, or that such documents are not available and the reasons therefor, or that such documents, suitably identified, have been withheld based upon the assertion of an identified privilege.
( b ) If the investigating official concludes that an action under the Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act may be warranted, the investigating official shall submit a report containing the findings and conclusions of such investigation to the reviewing official. To the extent possible, before initiating an investigation or submitting a report involving a licensee false statement to the reviewing official, the investigating official shall consult with the Executive Director for Operations to ascertain whether any other agency action is under consideration, pending, or may be taken with regard to the licensee, and to allow for coordination between any action under this part and other enforcement action.
( c ) Nothing in this section shall preclude or limit an investigating official's discretion to refer allegations directly to the Department of Justice for suit under the False Claims Act or other civil relief, or to refer the matter to the Executive Director for Operations for enforcement action under the Atomic Energy Act, or to defer initiating an investigation or postpone a report or referral to the reviewing official to avoid interference with other enforcement action by the Commission or with a criminal investigation or prosecution.
( d ) Nothing in this section modifies any responsibility of an investigating official to report violations of criminal law to the Attorney General.
###### Editorial Note on Part 51

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 51 appear at 80 FR 74980, Dec. 1, 2015.

#### § 51.6 Specific exemptions.

The Commission may, upon application of any interested person or upon its own initiative, grant such exemptions from the requirements of the regulations in this part as it determines are authorized by law and are otherwise in the public interest.
Editorial Note on Part 4
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 4 appear at 77 FR 39904, July 6, 2012.

§ 4.313 Exceptions to the rules against age discrimination. Normal operation or statutory objective of any program or activity. A recipient is permitted to take an action, otherwise prohibited by § 4.311, if the action reasonably takes into account age as a factor necessary to the normal operation or the achievement of any statutory objective of a program or activity. An action reasonably takes into account age as a factor necessary to the normal operation or the achievement of any statutory objective of a program or activity, if— ( a ) Age is used as a measure or approximation of one or more other characteristics; and
( b ) The other characteristic(s) must be measured or approximated in order for the normal operation of the program or activity to continue, or to achieve any statutory objective of the program or activity; and
( c ) The other characteristic(s) can be reasonably measured or approximated by the use of age; and
( d ) The other characteristic(s) are impractical to measure directly on an individual basis.
[52 FR 25358, July 7, 1987, as amended at 68 FR 51345, Aug. 26, 2003]
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, SOUTHERN DIVISION

JOELSONGS, et al., )

)

Plaintiffs, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

v. ) 1:06cv774-MHT

) 

SHELLEY BROADCASTING )

COMPANY, INC., et al., )

)

Defendants. )

 RULE 26(F) ORDER

The parties are reminded of the obligation, imposed

by Rule 26(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, to

confer and to develop a proposed discovery plan.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Rule 26(f) report

containing the discovery plan shall be filed as soon as

practicable but not later than November 2, 2006.

The longstanding practice in this district is that

dispositive motions shall be filed no later than 90 days

prior to the pretrial date. If the parties seek to vary

from that schedule, they should present, in the plan,

Case 1:06-cv-00774-MHT-SRW Document 10 Filed 10/18/2006 Page 1 of 3
2

specific case-related reasons for the requested variance.

In their Rule 26(f) report, however, the parties should

assume that the 90-day requirement will apply.

This case will be set for trial before the

undersigned judge during one of that judge's regularly

scheduled civil trial terms, within 7 to 10 months of

this order if a term is available and, if not available,

then as soon as possible thereafter. The pretrial date

is normally set within four to six weeks of a scheduled

trial term. The dates of each judge's civil trial terms

are available on the court's website located at

<http://almd.uscourts.gov> in the civil case information

section.

The court may or may not hold a scheduling conference

before issuing a scheduling order. If the court holds a

scheduling conference, counsel may participate in the

scheduling conference by conference call.

The scheduling order entered by the court will follow

the form of the Uniform Scheduling Order adopted by the

Case 1:06-cv-00774-MHT-SRW Document 10 Filed 10/18/2006 Page 2 of 3
judges of this court. The Uniform Scheduling Order is

also available on the court's website.

The report of the parties should comply with Form 35

of the Appendix of Forms to the Federal Rules of Civil

Procedure.

DONE, this the 18th day of October, 2006.

 /s/ Myron H. Thompson 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00774-MHT-SRW Document 10 Filed 10/18/2006 Page 3 of 3