alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications. 

 

I, Brian Baker, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of the J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Trust 2012-LC9 (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports; 

4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:

Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as Special Servicer, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee and Certificate Administrator, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Custodian, and Pentalpha Surveillance LLC, as Senior Trust Advisor.

 

Dated: March 30, 2015

 

/s/ Brian Baker

President and Chief Executive Officer

(senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
§ 15.39 Bankruptcy claims. When the NRC learns that a bankruptcy petition has been filed with respect to a debtor, before proceeding with further collection action, the NRC will immediately seek legal advice from its Office of the General Counsel concerning the impact of the Bankruptcy Code on any pending or contemplated collection activities. Unless the NRC determines that the automatic stay imposed at the time of filing pursuant to 11 U.S.C. 362 has been lifted or is no longer in effect, collection activity against the debtor will in most cases stop immediately. ( a ) After seeking legal advice from its Office of the General Counsel, a proof of claim usually will be filed with the bankruptcy court or the Trustee.
( b ) If the NRC is a secured creditor, it may seek relief from the automatic stay regarding its security, subject to the provisions and requirements of 11 U.S.C. 362.
( c ) Offset is stayed in most cases by the automatic stay. However, the NRC will seek legal advice from its Office of the General Counsel to determine whether its payments to the debtor and payments of other agencies available for offset may be frozen by the agency until relief from the automatic stay can be obtained from the bankruptcy court. The NRC will seek legal advice from its Office of the General Counsel to determine if recoupment is available.
[67 FR 30322, May 6, 2002]
#### § 996.20 USDA.

*USDA* means the United States Department of Agriculture, including any officer, employee, service, program, or branch of the Department of Agriculture, or any other person acting as the Secretary's agent or representative in connection with any provisions of this part.
1235.070-1 Contract clause.

The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 1252.235–70, Research Misconduct, in all

solicitations and contracts for research and development.

Parent topic: PART 1235—RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CONTRACTING
Case 1:06-cv-00760-WKW-DRB Document 1 Filed 08/24/2006 Page 1 of 1
#### BRYAN v. RICHARD DEEVES & SON.

(No. 5976.)

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

June 19, 1914.)

Appeal from Trial Term, First Department. Action by William. J. Bryan against Richard *1108Deeves & Son. From a judgment for plaintiff, and from an order denying a new trial, defendant appeals. Reversed, and new trial ordered. See, also, 147 N. Y. Supp. 1101.

Edward P. Mowton, of New York City, for appellant.

Henry Waldman, of New York City, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The verdict of the jury, in so far as it found that there had been any removal of the plank, was against the weight of evidence. The judgment and order appealed from are therefore reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.
§ 19.18 Sequestration of witnesses and exclusion of counsel in interviews conducted under subpoena. ( a ) All witnesses compelled by subpoena to submit to agency interviews shall be sequestered unless the official conducting the interviews permits otherwise.
( b ) Any witness compelled by subpoena to appear at an interview during an agency inquiry may be accompanied, represented, and advised by counsel of his or her choice. However, when the agency official conducting the inquiry determines, after consultation with the Office of the General Counsel, that the agency has concrete evidence that the presence of an attorney representing multiple interests would obstruct and impede the investigation or inspection, the agency official may prohibit that counsel from being present during the interview.
( c ) The interviewing official is to provide a witness whose counsel has been excluded under paragraph (b) of this section and the witness's counsel a written statement of the reasons supporting the decision to exclude. This statement, which must be provided no later than five working days after exclusion, must explain the basis for the counsel's exclusion. This statement must also advise the witness of the witness' right to appeal the exclusion decision and obtain an automatic stay of the effectiveness of the subpoena by filing a motion to quash the subpoena with the Commission within five days of receipt of this written statement.
( d ) Within five days after receipt of the written notification required in paragraph (c) of this section, a witness whose counsel has been excluded may appeal the exclusion decision by filing a motion to quash the subpoena with the Commission. The filing of the motion to quash will stay the effectiveness of the subpoena pending the Commission's decision on the motion.
( e ) If a witness' counsel is excluded under paragraph (b) of this section, the interview may, at the witness' request, either proceed without counsel or be delayed for a reasonable period of time to permit the retention of new counsel. The interview may also be rescheduled to a subsequent date established by the NRC, although the interview shall not be rescheduled by the NRC to a date that precedes the expiration of the time provided under § 19.18(d) for appeal of the exclusion of counsel, unless the witness consents to an earlier date.
[55 FR 247, Jan. 4, 1990, as amended at 56 FR 65948, Dec. 19, 1991; 57 FR 61785, Dec. 29, 1992]
exv10w14






Exhibit 10.14




Amendment to the

The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Executive Severance Plan




     Effective as of January 1, 2010, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Executive Severance Plan
(“Executive Plan”), amended and restated as of January 1, 2008, unless otherwise provided, is
amended as set forth below:



     1. Section 2.13. Section 2.13 of the Plan is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with
the following:




Section 2.13. “Committee” means the Compensation Committee of the Board.



     2. Section 3.01 Administration. Section 3.01 of the Plan is hereby deleted and replaced with
the following:




Section 3.01 Administration. The Plan shall be administered by the Vice President,
Employee Benefits of the Company (the “Plan Administrator”), who shall have full
authority to construe and interpret the Plan, to establish, amend and rescind rules
and regulations relating to the Plan, and to take all such actions and make all such
determinations in connection with the Plan as he or she may deem necessary or
desirable. Subject to Article VIII, decisions of the Plan Administrator shall be
reviewable by the Executive Vice President, Human Resources (the “Appeal Reviewer”).
Subject to Article VIII, the Appeal Reviewer shall also have the full authority to
make, amend, interpret, and enforce all appropriate rules and regulations for the
administration of the Plan and decide and resolve any and all questions, including
interpretations of the Plan, as may arise in connection with the Plan. The Plan
Administrator and the Appeal Reviewer shall each have the power to designate one or
more persons as he or she may deem necessary or desirable in connection with the
Plan, who need not be members of the Compensation Committee of the Board or
employees of the Company, to serve or perform some or all of the functions of the
Plan Administrator and Appeal Reviewer, respectively, on his or her behalf. Such
person(s) shall have the same rights and authority as the Plan Administrator and
Appeal Reviewer who appointed him or her would have had if acting directly. The
Appeal Reviewer (or its delegate) is the named fiduciary for purposes of deciding
any appeals of a claim denial pursuant to Article VIII.



     3. Section 3.02. Binding Effect of Decisions. The first sentence of Section 3.02 is hereby
amended by adding the words “or Appeal Reviewer” after the words “Plan Administrator”.



     4. Section 3.03. Indemnification. The first sentence of Section 3.03 is hereby amended by
adding the words “, Appeal Reviewer,” immediately following the words “Plan Administrator,”.



     5. Section 8.02. Appeal of Denial. Section 8.02 is hereby amended by deleting the word
“Committee” and replacing it with “Appeal Reviewer” in every instance therein.



* * * * *




     Except as set forth herein, the Executive Plan remains in full force and effect.




9
IV 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 431 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that there should 

be established a Lifelong Learning Week. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 7, 2005 

Mr. SWEENEY submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Government Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that 

there should be established a Lifelong Learning Week. 

Whereas the first week in September after Labor Day marks 

the beginning of the Lifelong Learning Semester; 

Whereas participation in lifelong learning programs has increased tremendously since 1962; 

Whereas there are over 300 Institutes for Learning in Retirement affiliated with colleges and universities across the 

country with over 100,000 members; 

Whereas the international network or partnership of lifelong 

learning programs and organizations consists of 1,900 

colleges, universities, conference centers, museums, and 

many other educational programs on a vast array of subjects; 
2 

•HRES 431 IH 

Whereas lifelong learning programs encourage volunteer participation by members, which helps develop a real sense 

of community among other learners; 

Whereas lifelong learning institutes have created communitybuilding programs such as 52 Activities to Share with 

Your Grandchild as part of the Adopt a Grandchild program; 

Whereas as over 76 million Baby Boomers prepare to reinvent retirement, the demand for education and volunteer opportunities in the community will increase greatly; 

Whereas lifelong learning programs provide stimulating educational opportunities for seniors and their peers in the 

community; and 

Whereas the establishment of the first full week in September 

as Lifelong Learning Week would recognize seniors, their 

teachers, and the institutions and programs involved with 

lifelong learning: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that there should be established a Lifelong 

3 Learning Week. 

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                            1887
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        8
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  1895
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    1895
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                               88
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                        1807
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      1895
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 14867
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      481
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   286
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 177
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  13923
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              13923
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  (255)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     13668
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   238.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   238.01
        

</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

vs. ) CR. NO. 2:06cr200-WHA

ROSA RINCON )

ORDER

No objection having been filed to the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc.

#64), entered on October 25, 2006, the court adopts the Recommendation, and it is hereby

ORDERED that Defendant Rincon’s Motion to Sever (Doc. #44) is DENIED.

DONE this 9th day of November, 2006.

/s/ W. Harold Albritton 

W. HAROLD ALBRITTON

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cr-00200-WHA-CSC Document 67 Filed 11/09/2006 Page 1 of 1
§ 503.9 Use of mixtures—general requirement for certain permanent exemptions. ( a ) *Criteria.* To qualify for a permanent exemption, except in the case of an exemption for fuel mixtures, section 213(a)(1) of the Act requires a demonstration that the use of a mixture of natural gas and petroleum and an alternate fuel for which an exemption under 10 CFR 503.38 (Fuel mixtures) would be available, would not be economically or technically feasible.
( b ) *Evidence.* The petition must include the following evidence in order to make the demonstration required by this section: ( 1 ) Duly executed certifications to the criteria set forth in paragraph (a) of this section; and
( 2 ) Exhibits containing the basis for the certifications submitted under this section (including those factual and analytical materials deemed by the petitioner to be sufficient to support its certifications to this general requirement.)
Note:
In meeting this general requirement, OFE will require a petitioner to examine only mixtures of oil and coal and natural gas and coal, or, where petitioner wishes to examine an additional or substitute mixture, such other alternate fuels as OFE and the petitioner agree are reasonable to petitioner's circumstances.
[46 FR 59903, Dec. 7, 1981, as amended at 54 FR 52894, Dec. 22, 1989]
Exhibit 32

Certification

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63
of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of FNB United Corp., a North Carolina corporation (the Corporation), does hereby certify that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 (the Form 10-Q) of the Corporation fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all materials respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.



|                   |  |  |  |                        
|------------------ |  |  |  | -----------------------
|Date: May 23, 2011 |  |  |  | /s/ R. LARRY CAMPBELL  
|                   |  |  |  | R. Larry Campbell      
|                   |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer
|                   |  | 
|Date: May 23, 2011 |  |  |  | /S/ MARK A.
SEVERSON   
|                   |  |  |  | Mark A. Severson       
|                   |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing
certification is being furnished solely pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a
separate disclosure document.
###### Editorial Note on Part 40

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 40 appear at 79 FR 75740, Dec. 19, 2014.

#### § 40.3 License requirements.

A person subject to the regulations in this part may not receive title to, own, receive, possess, use, transfer, provide for long-term care, deliver or dispose of byproduct material or residual radioactive material as defined in this part or any source material after removal from its place of deposit in nature, unless authorized in a specific or general license issued by the Commission under the regulations in this part.

[55 FR 45598, Oct. 30, 1990]
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

NORTHERN DIVISION 

FARMERS TELECOMMUNICATIONS 

COOPERATIVE, INC., 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

VERIZON BUSINESS NETWORK 

SERVICES INC. and QWEST 

COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION, 

 Defendants. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

)

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:06cv-00790-WC 

NOTICE OF SERVICE

 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the following discovery documents have been 

served on behalf of Verizon Business Network Services, Inc.: 

 Notice of Deposition of Qwest Communications Corporation Pursuant to 

Rule 30(b)(6) 

 First Set of Requests for Admission to Qwest Communications Corporation 

 First Requests for Production of Documents to Qwest Communications 

Corporation 

 First Set of Interrogatories to Qwest Communications Corporation 

 Notice of Deposition of Farmers Telecommunications Cooperative, Inc. 

Pursuant to Rule 30(b)(6) 

 First Set of Requests for Admission to Farmers Telecommunications 

Cooperative, Inc. 

 First Requests for Production to Farmers Telecommunications Cooperative, 

Inc. 

Case 2:06-cv-00790-WC Document 49 Filed 05/31/2007 Page 1 of 3
Respectfully Submitted, 

s/Robin H. Jones 

Starnes & Atchison LLP 

100 Brookwood Place, 7th Floor 

P.O. Box 598512 

Birmingham, Alabama 35259-8512 

Telephone: (205) 868-6000 

Fax: (205) 868-6099 

State Bar No.: JON143 

E-mail: rhj@starneslaw.com 

Case 2:06-cv-00790-WC Document 49 Filed 05/31/2007 Page 2 of 3
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

 I hereby certify that on May 31, 2007, I electronically filed the foregoing using the 

CM/ECF system, which will provide electronic service copies to the following: 

Dana H. Billingsley dana@wilkersonbryan.com, cathy@wilkersonbryan.com 

Leigh Anne Hodge lhodge@balch.com, jglover@balch.com 

Jonathan Michael Hooks jonathan@wilkersonbryan.com, 

Robin Garrett Laurie rlaurie@balch.com, dearly@balch.com 

Joseph Seawell Moore jsmoore@balch.com, dharris@balch.com 

 Mark Douglas Wilkerson mark@wilkersonbryan.com, cathy@wilkersonbryan.com 

Notice will be delivered by other means to: 

Jana Eisinger 

Qwest Services Corporation 

1801 California Street 

Suite 900 

Denver, CO 80202 

Patrick H. Tate 

P.O. Box 680593 

Fort Payne, AL 35968 

 

 

 __s/ Robin H. Jones__________________

 OF COUNSEL 

Case 2:06-cv-00790-WC Document 49 Filed 05/31/2007 Page 3 of 3
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

)

In the Matter of the Extradition of )

MARIA del ROSARIO MORENO-VAZQUEZ, ) CV. NO. 3:06cv761-MEF-CSC

a/k/a MARIA COONLEY )

)

UNITED STATES’ NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL

Comes now the United States of America, by and through Leura Garrett Canary,

United States Attorney for the Middle District of Alabama, and hereby notices the

appearance of Assistant United States Attorney Todd A. Brown, who will be serving as

counsel of record for the United States in this matter. 

 Respectfully submitted this the 25th of September, 2006.

LEURA G. CANARY

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

/s/ Todd A. Brown 

TODD A. BROWN

Assistant United States Attorney

Post Office Box 197

Montgomery, Alabama 36101-0197

(334) 223-7280

(334) 223-7135 fax

ASB-1901-O64T

todd.brown@usdoj.gov

Case 3:06-cv-00761-CSC Document 7 Filed 09/25/2006 Page 1 of 2
-2-

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

)

In the Matter of the Extradition of )

MARIA del ROSARIO MORENO-VAZQUEZ, ) CV. NO. 3:06cv761-MEF-CSC

a/k/a MARIA COONLEY )

)

Certificate of Service

I hereby certify that on September 25, 2006, I electronically filed the foregoing

with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system, which will send notification of

such filing to the following: Ben Elton Bruner. 

/s/ Todd A. Brown 

TODD A. BROWN

Assistant United States Attorney

Case 3:06-cv-00761-CSC Document 7 Filed 09/25/2006 Page 2 of 2
Editorial Note on Part 4
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 4 appear at 77 FR 39904, July 6, 2012.

§ 4.72 Exceptions and final decision. ( a ) The applicant or recipient, within thirty (30) days of the mailing of an initial decision or a recommended decision, may file with the Commission his exceptions to such decision, with his reasons therefor.
( b ) In the absence of exceptions to an initial decision, the Commission may, on its own motion within forty-five (45) days after the mailing of such initial decision, serve on the applicant or recipient a notice that the Commission will review the decision.
( c ) Upon the filing of exceptions to an initial decision or of a notice of review, the Commission shall review such initial decision and issue its own decision on the record with its reasons therefor.
( d ) In the absence of either exceptions to an initial decision or of a notice of review, such initial decision shall constitute the final decision of the Commission.
( e ) Upon the filing of exceptions to a recommended decision, the Commission shall review such recommended decision and issue its own decision on the record with its reasons therefor.
( f ) In the absence of exceptions to a recommended decision, the Commission shall review such recommended decision and issue its own decision on the record with its reasons therefor.
PGI 243.204-71 Certification of requests for equitable adjustment.       (b)  For example, a request for equitable adjustment that involves both an increase of $100,000 and a decrease of $105,000 has an absolute value of $205,000 ($100,000 + $105,000, regardless of whether the amounts are plus or minus), which exceeds the simplified acquisition threshold.    **Parent topic:** PGI 243.204 Administration.