alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 34
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 34 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

§ 34.101 Notifications. ( a ) In addition to the reporting requirements specified in § 30.50 and under other sections of this chapter, such as § 21.21, each licensee shall send a written report to the NRC's Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards, by an appropriate method listed in § 30.6(a) of this chapter, within 30 days of the occurrence of any of the following incidents involving radiographic equipment: ( 1 ) Unintentional disconnection of the source assembly from the control cable;
( 2 ) Inability to retract the source assembly to its fully shielded position and secure it in this position; or
( 3 ) Failure of any component (critical to safe operation of the device) to properly perform its intended function;
( b ) The licensee shall include the following information in each report submitted under paragraph (a) of this section, and in each report of overexposure submitted under 10 CFR 20.2203 which involves failure of safety components of radiography equipment: ( 1 ) A description of the equipment problem;
( 2 ) Cause of each incident, if known;
( 3 ) Name of the manufacturer and model number of equipment involved in the incident;
( 4 ) Place, date, and time of the incident;
( 5 ) Actions taken to establish normal operations;
( 6 ) Corrective actions taken or planned to prevent recurrence; and
( 7 ) Qualifications of personnel involved in the incident.
( c ) Any licensee conducting radiographic operations or storing radioactive material at any location not listed on the license for a period in excess of 180 days in a calendar year, shall notify the appropriate NRC regional office listed in § 30.6(b)(2) of this chapter prior to exceeding the 180 days.
[62 FR 28963, May 28, 1997, as amended at 67 FR 3585, Jan. 25, 2002; 68 FR 58805, Oct. 10, 2003; 73 FR 5720, Jan. 31, 2008; 83 FR 30287, June 28, 2018]
Exhibit 10(d)






EXHIBIT 10(d)




DESCRIPTION OF LIZ CLAIBORNE, INC.

2009 EMPLOYEE INCENTIVE PLAN




For the 2009 fiscal year, Liz Claiborne Inc. maintained a bonus plan for full time salaried
employees under which bonuses were earned based upon either divisional operating profit or total
gross corporate costs, as measured against pre-established targets, and, as applicable,
departmental performance considerations and the achievement of individual goals, subject to certain
terms and conditions. A similar bonus plan is anticipated for 2010.
PGI 225.7902-4 Procedures.

(1) Since the DTC Treaties apply only to eligible items, a solicitation or contract falls within the

scope of the DTC Treaties, and is thus eligible for DTC Treaty coverage (i.e., falls within the scope of

the DTC Treaties) if it will acquire at least one defense article that is not otherwise exempt from the

DTC Treaties and is required for—

(i) Combined military or counterterrorism operations as described in the Implementing

Arrangements;

(ii) Cooperative security and defense research, development, production, and support programs that

are identified pursuant to the Implementing Arrangements;

(iii) Cases where the government or Australia or the government of the United Kingdom is the end

user in mutually agreed specific security and defense projects, that are identified pursuant to the

Implementing Arrangements; or

(iv) U.S. Government end use under a solicitation or contract.

(2) Since the DTC Treaties apply only to eligible items, a solicitation or contract falls within the

scope of the DTC Treaties and is thus eligible for DTC Treaty coverage when it will acquire at least

one defense article that is DTC Treaty-eligible and the contract falls within the scope of the DTC

Treaties. Article 3, section (2) of each DTC Treaty and Section 4 of each Implementing Arrangement

require the DTC Treaty Participants to maintain lists of defense articles to be exempted from the

scope of the DTC Treaties. These exempted technology lists are incorporated in Supplement No. 1 to

part of the ITAR and are accessible at: http://www.pmddtc.state.gov/treaties/index.html

(3) The DTC Treaties do not apply to defense articles initially being acquired pursuant to the U.S.

Foreign Military Sales (FMS) program, although, once the defense articles are acquired by the

Australia or United Kingdom under an FMS case, the DTC Treaty applies as though the defense

articles were exported under the DTC Treaty, subject to PGI 225.7902-2 .

(4) If a company obtains an export license, or other authorization, for the export of defense articles

that might otherwise have been eligible for export without a license under a DTC Treaty, the terms

of the export license, or other authorization, shall apply unless and until the company obtains

approval to transition to DTC Treaty coverage. The process and requirements for transition are

described in 22 CFR 126.16(i) and 22 CFR 126.17(i), respectively.

Parent topic: PGI 225.7902 Defense Trade Cooperation Treaties.
PGI 211.201 Identification and availability of specifications.       (1) Specifications, standards, and data item descriptions are             indexed in the Acquisition Streamlining and Standardization Information System             (ASSIST).          (2) Most unclassified specifications, standards,             and data item descriptions, and DoD adoption notices on voluntary consensus standards             may be downloaded from the ASSIST database (https://assist.dla.mil or                http://quicksearch.dla.mil ). Documents contained in             ASSIST that are not available for download may be identified and obtained by following             the instructions at http://assist.dla.mil/online/faqs/overview.cfm .    **Parent topic:** PGI 211.2 -USING AND MAINTAINING REQUIREMENTS DOCUMENTS
1

ALD-232 NOT PRECEDENTIAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

___________

No. 12-2829

___________

IN RE: KEITH MANFREDI, Petitioner

____________________________________

On a Petition for Writ of Mandamus from the

United States District Court for the District of New Jersey

(Related to D.N.J. 12-cv-01905)

____________________________________

Submitted Pursuant to Rule 21, Fed. R. App. P.

July 19, 2012

Before: SLOVITER, FISHER and WEIS, Circuit

(Opinion filed: July 31, 2012)

Judges

_________

OPINION

_________

PER CURIAM.

Keith Manfredi petitions this Court for a writ of mandamus compelling the United 

States District Court for the District of New Jersey to rule on a motion for summary 

judgment. We will deny the petition as moot.

In March of 2012, Manfredi filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 

28 U.S.C. §2241, challenging a prison disciplinary decision that resulted in the loss of 

good time credit. On May 14 2012, Manfredi filed a motion for summary judgment. On 

July 5, 2012, Manfredi filed a petition for a writ of mandamus, requesting that we compel 
2

the District Court to grant him summary judgment. Meanwhile, the District Court 

ordered the United States to file an answer within thirty days on July 12, 2012, and 

denied Manfredi’s motion without prejudice on July 13, 2012 because it was filed 

prematurely. 

In light of the District Court decision, to the extent Manfredi is asking us to 

compel a ruling on his motion, the petition is denied as moot. See In re Orthopedic Bone 

Screw Prod. Liab. Litig., 94 F.3d 110 (3d Cir. 1996). To the extent that Manfredi seeks 

relief relating to the merits of the claims raised in his habeas petition, mandamus is not an 

alternative to an appeal. In re Chambers Dev. Co., Inc.

We will deny the petition for a writ of mandamus. 

, 148 F.3d 214. (“A writ of 

mandamus should not be issued where relief may be obtained through an ordinary 

appeal”). Besides, the District Court has yet to rule on his §2241 petition.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

FRANCISCO VALLES,

 

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 State.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-18-00061-CR

Appeal from the

409thDistrict Court

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 20150D02069)

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Court Reporter’s third request for an extension of time within 

which to file the Reporter’s Record until August 19, 2018. NO FURTHER REQUESTS FOR 

EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE THE REPORTER’S RECORD WILL BECONSIDERED 

BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that Natalie Martinez, Official Court Reporter for the 409th

District Court, for El Paso County, Texas, prepare the Reporter’s Record for the above styled

and numbered cause and forward the same to this Court on or before August 19, 2018.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 24th day of July, 2018.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez and Palafox, JJ.
ex10_11.htm


     

    
      Employment
Contract of Mr Zhao Baotang

      Retainer: Dong guan CHDITN
printing co. ltd

      Employee: Mr Zhao,
baotang

      Job
duty:

      Chief
Sales Officer: making sales strategy, analyzing market and sales
predition

      Working
periods: since july 1. 2009 to june 30 2011

      


      Salary:
RMB15000 per month.

      


      Sign date: July 1
2009
H. Res. 337 

In the House of Representatives, U.S., 

June 23, 2005. 

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule 

XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the 

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of 

the bill (H.R. 3010) making appropriations for the Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education, 

and Related Agencies for the fiscal year ending September 

30, 2006, and for other purposes. The first reading of the bill 

shall be dispensed with. All points of order against consideration of the bill are waived. General debate shall be confined 

to the bill and shall not exceed one hour equally divided and 

controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of 

the Committee on Appropriations. After general debate the 

bill shall be considered for amendment under the five-minute 

rule. Points of order against provisions in the bill for failure 

to comply with clause 2 of rule XXI are waived except for 

section 511. During consideration of the bill for amendment, 

the Chairman of the Committee of the Whole may accord pri-
2 

•HRES 337 EH 

ority in recognition on the basis of whether the Member offering an amendment has caused it to be printed in the portion 

of the Congressional Record designated for that purpose in 

clause 8 of rule XVIII. Amendments so printed shall be considered as read. When the Committee rises and reports the 

bill back to the House with a recommendation that the bill 

do pass, the previous question shall be considered as ordered 

on the bill and amendments thereto to final passage without 

intervening motion except one motion to recommit with or 

without instructions. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

MEMORANDUM ORDER

Appellate case name: Demarquis Rogers v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01-15-00553-CR

Trial court case number: 14-DCR-065079A

Trial court: 268th District Court of Fort Bend County

On December 29, 2015, we issued an order, abating the appeal and remanding to the trial 

court to hold a hearing to determine why appellant had not filed his brief. On January 7, 2016, a 

supplemental clerk’s record was filed, containing the trial court’s findings. The trial court 

appointed counsel for appellant and set a brief due 60 days from the date of entry of its findings.

Accordingly, we order the appeal reinstated on the active docket. Appellant’s brief is due 

on or before March 7, 2016.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Harvey Brown

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: January 12, 2016
§ 39.15 Agreement with well owner or operator. ( a ) A licensee may perform well logging with a sealed source only after the licensee has a written agreement with the employing well owner or operator. This written agreement must identify who will meet the following requirements: ( 1 ) If a sealed source becomes lodged in the well, a reasonable effort will be made to recover it.
( 2 ) A person may not attempt to recover a sealed source in a manner which, in the licensee's opinion, could result in its rupture.
( 3 ) The radiation monitoring required in § 39.69(a) will be performed.
( 4 ) If the environment, any equipment, or personnel are contaminated with licensed material, they must be decontaminated before release from the site or release for unrestricted use; and
( 5 ) If the sealed source is classified as irretrievable after reasonable efforts at recovery have been expended, the following requirements must be implemented within 30 days: ( i ) Each irretrievable well logging source must be immobilized and sealed in place with a cement plug.
( ii ) A means to prevent inadvertent intrusion on the source, unless the source is not accessible to any subsequent drilling operations; and
( iii ) A permanent identification plaque, constructed of long lasting material such as stainless steel, brass, bronze, or monel, must be mounted at the surface of the well, unless the mounting of the plaque is not practical. The size of the plaque must be at least 17 cm [7 inches] square and 3 mm [ 1 ⁄ 8-inch] thick. The plaque must contain— ( A ) The word “CAUTION”;
( B ) The radiation symbol (the color requirement in § 20.1901(a) need not be met);
( C ) The date the source was abandoned;
( D ) The name of the well owner or well operator, as appropriate;
( E ) The well name and well identification number(s) or other designation;
( F ) An identification of the sealed source(s) by radionuclide and quantity;
( G ) The depth of the source and depth to the top of the plug; and
( H ) An appropriate warning, such as, “DO NOT RE-ENTER THIS WELL.”
( b ) The licensee shall retain a copy of the written agreement for 3 years after the completion of the well logging operation.
( c ) A licensee may apply, pursuant to § 39.91, for Commission approval, on a case-by-case basis, of proposed procedures to abandon an irretrievable well logging source in a manner not otherwise authorized in paragraph (a)(5) of this section.
( d ) A written agreement between the licensee and the well owner or operator is not required if the licensee and the well owner or operator are part of the same corporate structure or otherwise similarly affiliated. However, the licensee shall still otherwise meet the requirements in paragraphs (a)(1) through (a)(5).
[52 FR 8234, Mar. 17, 1987, as amended at 56 FR 23472, May 21, 1991; 58 FR 67660, Dec. 22, 1993; 65 FR 20344, Apr. 17, 2000]
###### Editorial Note on Part 2

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

#### § 2.912 Weight to be attached to classified evidence.

In considering the weight and effect of any Restricted Data or other National Security Information received in evidence to which an interested party has not had opportunity to receive access, the presiding officer and the Commission shall give to such evidence such weight as is appropriate under the circumstances, taking into consideration any lack of opportunity to rebut or impeach the evidence.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

 )

 v. ) 

) 1:06-cr-201-WHA

OSCAR MARTINEZ-RAMIREZ )

MOTION TO DECREASE DEFENDANT’S OFFENSE LEVEL

PURSUANT TO § 3E1.1(b), UNITED STATES SENTENCING GUIDELINES

(ACCEPTANCE OF RESPONSIBILITY)

COMES NOW the United States of America, by and through Leura G. Canary,

United States Attorney for the Middle District of Alabama, and files the above-captioned

Motion, and as reasons therefore, submits the following:

1. Defendant qualifies for a reduction in Defendant’s sentence pursuant to U.S.S.G

§ 3E1.1(b) as Defendant assisted authorities in the investigation and prosecution of

Defendant’s own misconduct by timely notifying authorities of Defendant’s intention to

enter a plea of guilty, thereby permitting the United States to avoid preparing for trial and

permitting the Government and this Court to allocate their resources efficiently.

2. Accordingly, pursuant to U.S.S.G § 3E1.1(b), the United States respectfully

moves this Court to reduce the Defendant’s offense level by one level. Combined with the

two-level reduction applied to Defendant’s offense level pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1(a),

a total reduction of three levels should be applied to Defendant’s offense level for

Defendant’s acceptance of responsibility.

Case 1:06-cr-00201-WHA-CSC Document 53 Filed 05/07/2007 Page 1 of 3
Respectfully submitted this the 7th day of May, 2007.

LEURA G. CANARY

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

s/A. Clark Morris

A. CLARK MORRIS

Assistant United States Attorney

One Court Square, Suite 201

Montgomery, AL 36104

Phone: (334)223-7280

Fax: (334)223-7135

E-mail: clark. morris@usdoj.gov

ASB-1613-N77A

Case 1:06-cr-00201-WHA-CSC Document 53 Filed 05/07/2007 Page 2 of 3
3

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

 )

 v. ) 

) 1:06-cr-201-WHA

OSCAR MARTINEZ-RAMIREZ )

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on May 7, 2007, I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk

of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing to the

following: Richard Keith, Esquire.

Respectfully submitted,

s/A. Clark Morris

A. CLARK MORRIS

Assistant United States Attorney

One Court Square, Suite 201

Montgomery, AL 36104

Phone: (334)223-7280

Fax: (334)223-7135

E-mail: clark. morris@usdoj.gov

ASB-1613-N77A

Case 1:06-cr-00201-WHA-CSC Document 53 Filed 05/07/2007 Page 3 of 3
EXHIBIT 32

                  Certification of Chief Executive Officer and
            Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 8 U.S.C. Section 1350
      as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

                                  CERTIFICATION

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Water Chef, Inc., a Delaware
corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2007
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350 as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge and upon a review
of the Report that:

     (1) the Report of the Company filed today pursuant to Section 13(a) of the
     Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), fully
     complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act; and

     (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.

This certification is based upon, among other things, my responsibilities as
Chief Executive Officer, my own due diligence and representations made by
certain members of the Company's senior management.





Dated: 5/14/07


                                            /s/  Leslie J. Kessler
                                            ----------------------------------
                                                 Leslie J. Kessler
                                                 President,
                                                 Chief Executive Officer and
                                                 Chief Financial Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Office of the Secretary

      ( print page 80055)    
                    Section 30.18 of the Department of Health and Human Services' claims collection regulations (45 CFR part 30) provides that the Secretary shall charge an annual rate of interest, which is determined and fixed by the Secretary of the Treasury after considering private consumer rates of interest on the date that the Department of Health and Human Services becomes entitled to recovery. The rate cannot be lower than the Department of Treasury's current value of funds rate or the applicable rate determined from the “Schedule of Certified Interest Rates with Range of Maturities” unless the Secretary waives interest in whole or part, or a different rate is prescribed by statute, contract, or repayment agreement. The Secretary of the Treasury may revise this rate quarterly. The Department of Health and Human Services publishes this rate in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                

                    The current rate of 10                    3/4                    %, as fixed by the Secretary of the Treasury, is certified for the quarter ended September 30, 2010. This interest rate is effective until the Secretary of the Treasury notifies the Department of Health and Human Services of any change.                

Dated: December 9, 2010.

Molly P. Dawson,

Director, Office of Financial Policy and Reporting.

[FR Doc. 2010-31979 Filed 12-20-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4150-04-P
EXHIBIT 99.3

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350,  As Adopted Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  Granite Real Estate Investment Trust

In
connection with the annual report of Granite Real Estate Investment Trust (the "Company") on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014 (the "Report") to
which this certification is an exhibit, I, Michael Forsayeth, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

Date: March 4, 2015By:

/s/ MICHAEL FORSAYETH Name: Michael Forsayeth
Title: Chief Financial Officer


---





EXHIBIT 99.3

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350,  As Adopted Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  Granite REIT Inc.

In
connection with the annual report of Granite REIT Inc. (the "Company") on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014 (the "Report") to which this
certification is an exhibit, I, Michael Forsayeth, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

Date: March 4, 2015By:

/s/ MICHAEL FORSAYETH Name: Michael Forsayeth
Title: Chief Financial Officer


---



QuickLinks
PGI 213.1 -PROCEDURES

Parent topic: PGI Part 213 - SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITIONPROCEDURES

PGI 213.104 Promoting competition.

For information on the various approaches that may be used to competitively fulfill DoD

requirements, see the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment

Guidelines for Creating and Maintaining a Competitive Environment for Supplies and Services in the

Department of Defense.