alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
H. Res. 248

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

April 28, 2005.

Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall

be in order to consider the conference report to accompany

the concurrent resolution (H. Con. Res. 95) establishing the

congressional budget for the United States Government for

fiscal year 2006, revising appropriate budgetary levels for fiscal year 2005, and setting forth appropriate budgetary levels

for fiscal years 2007 through 2010. All points of order

against the conference report and against its consideration

are waived. The conference report shall be considered as read.

The conference report shall be debatable for one hour equally

divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority

member of the Committee on the Budget.

SEC. 2. (a) During the One Hundred Ninth Congress,

except as provided in subsection (c), a motion that the Committee of the Whole rise and report a bill to the House shall

not be in order if the bill, as amended, exceeds an applicable

allocation of new budget authority under section 302(b) of
2

•HRES 248 EH

the Congressional Budget Act of 1974, as estimated by the

Committee on the Budget.

(b) If a point of order under subsection (a) is sustained,

the Chair shall put the question: ‘‘Shall the Committee of the

Whole rise and report the bill to the House with such amendments as may have been adopted notwithstanding that the

bill exceeds its allocation of new budget authority under section 302(b) of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974?’’. Such

question shall be debatable for 10 minutes equally divided

and controlled by a proponent of the question and an opponent but shall be decided without intervening motion.

(c) Subsection (a) shall not apply—

(1) to a motion offered under clause 2(d) of rule

XXI; or

(2) after disposition of a question under subsection

(b) on a given bill.

(d) If a question under subsection (b) is decided in the

negative, no further amendment shall be in order except—

(1) one proper amendment, which shall be debatable

for 10 minutes equally divided and controlled by the proponent and an opponent, shall not be subject to amendment, and shall not be subject to a demand for division

of the question in the House or in the Committee of the

Whole; and
3

•HRES 248 EH

(2) pro forma amendments, if offered by the chairman or ranking minority member of the Committee on

Appropriations or their designees, for the purpose of debate.

Attest:

Clerk.
#### § 984.38 Eligibility.

No person shall be selected or continue to serve as a member or alternate to represent one of the groups specified in § 984.35(a)(1) through (6) or § 984.38(b)(1) through (6), unless he or she is engaged in the business he or she is to represent, or represents, either in his or her own behalf or as an officer or employee if the business unit engaged in such business. Also, each member or alternate member representing growers in District 1 or District 2 shall be a grower, or officer or employee of the group he or she is to represent.

[73 FR 11338, Mar. 3, 2008]
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

IYAD NAIM ABDULLAH

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 19

- 3729

[ October 29, 2020 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit,

Broward County ; Martin S. Fein , Judge; L.T. Case No. 14

- 14727 CF10A

.

Fred Haddad of Fred Haddad, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Rachael Kaiman,

Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

D AMOORGIAN

, C IKLIN and F ORST

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
§ 490.500 Purpose and scope. This subpart implements the statutory requirements of section 508 of the Act, which provides for the allocation of credits to fleets or covered persons that: ( a ) Acquire alternative fueled vehicles in excess of the number they are required to acquire under this part or obtain alternative fueled vehicles before the model year when they are required to do so under this part;
( b ) Acquire certain other vehicles as identified in this subpart; or
( c ) Invest in qualified alternative fuel infrastructure or non-road equipment or an emerging technology.
[79 FR 15904, Mar. 21, 2014]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                    MAR-31-1998             DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                               550924                       0                             
<SECURITIES>                              0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                             0                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                              0                       0
<INVENTORY>                               0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          0                       0
<PP&E>                             13705540                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                      7019713                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                      7318943                      0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     0                       0
<BONDS>                                   0                       0
<COMMON>                                  0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0                       0
<PREFERRED>                               0                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                0                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>        7318943                       0
<SALES>                              657528                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                     659862                       0
<CGS>                                     0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             0                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        0                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                      221415                       0
<INCOME-TAX>                              0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                  221415                       0   
<DISCONTINUED>                            0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0                       0
<CHANGES>                                 0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                         221415                       0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                             0                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                             0                       0
        

</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

FRANK DIGMAN,

Defendant Below,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF DELAWARE,

Plaintiff Below,

Appellee.

§

§ No. 594, 2018

§

§ Court Below—Superior Court

§ of the State of Delaware

§

§ Cr. ID No. 1104022622 (N)

§

§

§

§

Submitted: February 12, 2019

 Decided: February 21, 2019

ORDER

On January 28, 2019, the Chief Deputy Clerk issued a notice, by certified 

mail, directing the appellant to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed 

for the appellant's failure to file the opening brief. The appellant received the notice 

to show cause by February 1, 2019 but did not respond to it, and has not filed the

opening brief. Dismissal of the appeal is therefore deemed to be unopposed.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, under Supreme Court Rules 3(b)(2) 

and 29(b), that the appeal is DISMISSED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ James T. Vaughn, Jr.

Justice
§ 429.5 Imported products. ( a ) Any person importing any covered product or covered equipment into the United States shall comply with the provisions of this part, and parts 430 and 431, and is subject to the remedies of this part.
( b ) Any covered product or covered equipment offered for importation in violation of this part, or part 430 or 431, shall be refused admission into the customs territory of the United States under rules issued by the U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) and subject to further remedies as provided by law, except that CBP may, by such rules, authorize the importation of such covered product or covered equipment upon such terms and conditions (including the furnishing of a bond) as may appear to CBP appropriate to ensure that such covered product or covered equipment will not violate this part, or part 430 or 431, or will be exported or abandoned to the United States.
#### In the Matter of Rodney Young, Appellant, v Robert Dennison, as Chair of the New York State Board of Parole, Respondent.

[814 NYS2d 412]

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Bradley, J.), entered September 27, 2005 in Albany County, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of the Board of Parole revoking petitioner’s parole.

In September 2001, petitioner was released to parole supervision having been convicted of numerous crimes in 1992 and 1993. In April 2003, he was charged with violating certain rules governing his parole. As relevant here, petitioner was found to be in possession of a crack pipe containing residue which provided the basis for charges accusing him of possessing drug paraphernalia and a controlled substance. Following a final parole revocation hearing, petitioner was found guilty of the allegations and his parole was revoked. He was ordered held for 24 months. After the determination was affirmed on administrative appeal, petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding. Following joinder of issue, Supreme Court dismissed the petition and this appeal ensued.

*1195The charges forming the basis of the revocation of petitioner’s parole are predicated on his violation of rule 8, which states, in pertinent part, that “[a] releasee will not behave in such manner as to violate the provisions of any law to which he is subject which provides for penalty of imprisonment” (9 NYCRR 8003.2 [h]). Petitioner contends that, inasmuch as he was not criminally convicted of possessing drug paraphernalia or a controlled substance, he should have been charged with violating rule 11 instead of rule 8. Rule 11 provides that “[a] releasee will not use or possess any drug paraphernalia or use or possess any controlled substance without proper medical authorization” (9 NYCRR 8003.2 [k]). Although rule 11 specifically addresses the possession of drug paraphernalia and controlled substances, rule 8 also encompasses conduct of this nature inasmuch as the possession of such items is violative of the law. The fact that petitioner was not convicted of criminal possession of drugs and drug paraphernalia does not preclude his parole revocation on the basis of such conduct *(see Matter of Williams v New York State Bd. of Parole,*277 AD2d 617, 617 [2000]). Petitioner’s remaining contentions are either not preserved for our review or are lacking in merit.

Mercure, J.P., Peters, Carpinello, Mugglin and Kane, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.
#### § 436.23 Estimated simple payback time.

The estimated simple payback time is the number of years required for the cumulative value of energy or water cost savings less future non-fuel or non-water costs to equal the investment costs of the building energy or water system, without consideration of discount rates.

[61 FR 32651, June 25, 1996]
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA

Present: Judges Bray, Annunziata and Overton

HENRY A. REED T/A REED CONSTRUCTION

v. Record No. 2663-96-2 MEMORANDUM OPINION * PER CURIAM ROGER DALE FISHER, SR., APRIL 1, 1997 TIM LAMBERT T/A LAMBERT CONSTRUCTION, AUTO OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY AND CRITTENDEN ADJUSTMENT COMPANY

FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION (William T. Fitzhugh; Beddow, Marley & Associates, on briefs), for appellant. (B. Mayes Marks, Jr., on brief), for appellee Roger Dale Fisher, Sr. (Mark M. Caldwell, III; Sands, Anderson, Marks & Miller, on brief), for appellees Tim Lambert t/a Lambert Construction, Auto Owners Insurance Company and Crittenden Adjustment Company.

Henry A. Reed t/a Reed Construction (employer) contends that the Workers' Compensation Commission (commission) erred in finding Roger D. Fisher, Sr. (claimant) proved he was totally disabled from August 8, 1995 through September 1, 1995 and from September 14, 1995 and continuing. 1 Upon reviewing the record and the briefs of the parties, we conclude that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we summarily affirm the commission's decision. Rule 5A:27.

* Pursuant to Code § 17-116.010 this opinion is not designated for publication.

1 Claimant conceded before the commission that he attempted to work during the first two weeks in September 1995, and he waived his claim for benefits for these two weeks.2 On appeal, we view the evidence in the light most favorable to the prevailing party below. R.G. Moore Bldg. Corp. v. Mullins , 10 Va. App. 211, 212, 390 S.E.2d 788, 788 (1990). Factual findings made by the commission will be upheld on appeal if supported by credible evidence. James v. Capitol Steel

Constr. Co. , 8 Va. App. 512, 515, 382 S.E.2d 487, 488 (1989). Dr. Mohamed Tawfick's medical records and his February 28, 1996 responses to claimant's counsel's written questions provide ample credible evidence to support the commission's decision. Dr. Tawfick treated claimant from August 8, 1995, the date of his work-related accident, through December 7, 1995. In responding to counsel's questions on February 28, 1996, Dr. Tawfick stated that he had taken claimant out of work during the course of his treatment. In addition, Dr. Tawfick stated that as of February 28, 1996, he had not released claimant to return to work. Employer presented no medical evidence to dispute Dr. Tawfick's opinions. In addition, based upon claimant's testimony, the commission could infer that claimant did not return to Dr. Tawfick after December 7, 1995 because employer had denied the claim, and claimant had no resources with which to seek medical

treatment. Because Dr. Tawfick's undisputed medical records and opinions provide credible evidence to support the commission's finding that claimant was totally disabled from August 8, 1995 through September 1, 1995 and from September 14, 1995 and3 continuing, this finding is binding and conclusive upon us on appeal. Claimant's request for an award of attorney's fees and costs pursuant to Code § 65.2-713 is denied. For the reasons stated, we affirm the commission's decision. Affirmed.
NotesFAQContact Us

Collection

Thesaurus
AdvancedSearch Tips

Collection

Thesaurus
BrowseThesaurus

 Download full text

**ERIC Number:**

**Record Type:**

**Publication Date:**

**Pages:**

**Abstractor:**

**ISBN:**

**ISSN:**

**EISSN:**

Caregiver Child RelationshipCaregiver RoleChild AbuseChild DevelopmentConflict ResolutionEarly Childhood EducationFamily ViolenceLearningParent Child RelationshipParent EducationParent RolePreventionTeacher RoleTeacher Student RelationshipViolenceYoung Children

**Publication Type:**

**Education Level:**

**Audience:**

**Language:**

**Sponsor:**

**Authoring Institution:**

**Grant or Contract Numbers:**

PrivacyCopyrightContact UsSelection PolicyAPI
JournalsNon-JournalsDownloadSubmitMultimediaWidget
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

JIGNESHKUMAR PATEL, )

#A97-454-881, )

)

Petitioner, )

)

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:06cv776-MHT

) (WO)

DIRECTOR IMMIGRATION & )

CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, et al., )

)

Respondents. )

ORDER

There being no objections filed to the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge filed

herein on August 31, 2006 (doc. no. 2), said Recommendation is hereby adopted, and it is

the

ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of the court that this case is TRANSFERRED

to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Alabama pursuant to the

provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a).

DONE, this the 25th day of September, 2006.

 /s/ Myron H. Thompson 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00776-MHT-SRW Document 3 Filed 09/25/06 Page 1 of 1
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

ANGELA DENISE NAILS, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CASE NO. 1:06-CV-760-WKW

)

CITY OF DOTHAN, )

)

Defendant. )

ORDER

It is hereby ORDERED that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), this case is referred

to Magistrate Judge Delores R. Boyd for all pretrial proceedings and entry of any orders or

recommendations as may be appropriate.

DONE this 30th day of August, 2006.

 /s/ W. Keith Watkins 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00760-WKW-DRB Document 3 Filed 08/30/2006 Page 1 of 1
First Amendment to the CryoLife, Inc. 2004 Employee Stock Incentive Plan



 Exhibit 10.46 
 FIRST AMENDMENT TO 
 THE CRYOLIFE, INC.

 2004 EMPLOYEE STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN 
 Section 4.4 of the CryoLife, Inc. 2004 Employee Stock Incentive Plan is hereby amended by deleting it in its entirety and replacing it with the following: 
 4.4 Tax Withholding. All distributions under the Plan are subject to withholding of all applicable taxes, and the Committee may condition the
delivery of any shares or other benefits under the Plan on satisfaction of the applicable withholding obligations. The Committee, in its discretion, and subject to such requirements as the Committee may impose prior to the occurrence of such
withholding, may permit such withholding obligations to be satisfied through cash payment by the Participant, through the surrender of shares of Stock which the Participant already owns, or through the surrender of unrestricted shares of Stock to
which the Participant is otherwise entitled under the Plan, but only to the extent of the minimum amount required to be withheld under applicable law. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this First Amendment to be executed effective as of the 27th day of October, 2009. 
  

					
	CRYOLIFE, INC.
		
	By:	 	/s/ D. Ashley Lee
		 	Name:	 	D. Ashley Lee
		 	Title:	 	 Executive Vice President,
 Chief Financial Officer and
 Chief Operating Officer
IIB 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 995 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

NOVEMBER 29, 2017 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural 

Resources 

AN ACT 

To direct the Secretary of Agriculture and the Secretary 

of the Interior to modernize terms in certain regulations. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 995 RFS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘21st Century Respect 

3 Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS TO REGULATIONS REQUIRED. 

5 (a) SECRETARY OF AGRICULTURE.—The Secretary 

6 of Agriculture shall amend section 1901.202 of title 7, 

7 Code of Federal Regulations, for purposes of— 

8 (1) replacing the reference to the term ‘‘Negro 

9 or Black’’ with ‘‘Black or African American’’; 

10 (2) replacing the reference to the term ‘‘Span11 ish Surname’’ with ‘‘Hispanic’’; and 

12 (3) replacing the reference to the term ‘‘Ori13 ental’’ with ‘‘Asian American or Pacific Islander’’. 

14 (b) SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR.—The Secretary 

15 of the Interior shall amend section 906.2 of title 36, Code 

16 of Federal Regulations, for purposes of— 

17 (1) replacing the references to the term 

18 ‘‘Negro’’ with ‘‘Black or African American’’; 

19 (2) replacing the definition of ‘‘Negro’’ with the 

20 definition of ‘‘Black or African American’’ as ‘‘a per21 son having origins in any of the Black racial groups 

22 of Africa’’; 

23 (3) replacing the references to the term ‘‘Ori24 ental’’ with ‘‘Asian American or Pacific Islander’’; 

25 and 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 995 RFS

1 (4) replacing the references to the terms ‘‘Es2 kimo’’ and ‘‘Aleut’’ with ‘‘Alaska Native’’. 

3 SEC. 3. RULE OF CONSTRUCTION. 

4 Nothing in this Act, or the amendments required by 

5 this Act, shall be construed to affect Federal law, except 

6 with respect to the use of terms by the Secretary of Agri7 culture and the Secretary of the Interior, respectively, to 

8 the regulations affected by this Act. 

Passed the House of Representatives November 28, 

2017. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
Subpart 2143.1 - General

Parent topic: PART 2143 - CONTRACT MODIFICATIONS

2143.101 Definitions.

The effective date of a FEGLI contract modification is as defined in FAR 43.101, except to the extent

that the definition conflicts with LIFAR 2101.370.
Case 3:06-cv-00777-MHT-TFM Document 7 Filed 09/26/2006 Page 1 of 3
Case 3:06-cv-00777-MHT-TFM Document 7 Filed 09/26/2006 Page 2 of 3
Case 3:06-cv-00777-MHT-TFM Document 7 Filed 09/26/2006 Page 3 of 3
Exhibit 35.3a



|     |  |                                     
|---- |  | ------------------------------------
|LOGO |  | 1 Corelogic Drive
Westlake, TX 76262

SERVICER COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION

This Servicer Compliance Certification is issued pursuant to the Tax Outsourcing Agreement dated as of May 28, 2009 (together with all amendments thereto, the
Agreement), between Cenlar FSB (Bank) and CoreLogic Tax Services, LLC (CoreLogic).

I, Vicki Chenault, an authorized
officer of CoreLogic, certify to Bank and with the knowledge and intent that it will rely upon this certification, that:

1. The servicing
information required to be provided to Bank by CoreLogic under the Agreement has been so provided;

2. I am responsible for reviewing the
activities performed by CoreLogic under the Agreement and, based upon my knowledge and in all material respects throughout the relevant reporting period, CoreLogic has fulfilled its obligations under the Agreement.

3. Attached to this Servicer Compliance Certification is a list of all material failures and the nature and status thereof. [NONE/NO
ATTACHMENT]



|                            |  |                      
|--------------------------- |  | ---------------------
|CORELOGIC TAX SERVICES, LLC
|                            | 
|By:                         |  | /s/ Vicki Chenault   
|                            |  | Vicki Chenault       
|                            |  | Senior Vice President
|                            |  | February 11, 2016