alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
exv10w2







Exhibit
10.2







MEMORANDUM




	 	 	 
	To:

	 	Mike Rissman
	 
	 	 
	From:

	 	Jim O’Connor
	 
	 	 
	Date:

	 	February 9, 2010
	 
	 	 
	Re:

	 	Termination of Employment Agreement






     This is to confirm that in connection with your promotion to Executive Vice President and
General Counsel and the implementation of the Company’s Executive Separation Policy (“Policy”),
effective February 9, 2010 you have agreed to the cancellation of the employment agreement you
entered into with the Company effective December 5, 2008 (“Employment Agreement”). As a result,
your employment with the Company will be continued on an at-will basis which means that either you
or the Company can terminate the employment relationship at any time.



     You agree to the cancellation of your Employment Agreement in return for your participation in
the Policy. Your severance benefits under the Policy will be similar to those provided under your
Employment Agreement, except that: (1) your severance amounts will be increased from a level of one
time to two times your base salary (or, in the case of your termination without cause or for good
reason within one year following a change in control, from a level of one time to two times your
base salary plus target bonus) which is the severance amount provided under the Policy to eligible
Named Executive Officers; and (2) continued medical benefits will be increased from one to two
years.



     You understand and acknowledge that severance benefits under the Policy are payable only if
you have signed the Company’s Non-Solicitation, Confidentiality and Arbitration Agreement designed
for your position and have executed a Separation Agreement on the appropriate form provided by the
Company which contains a full release of all claims that you may have against the Company.



     You also understand and acknowledge that the Company may modify or terminate the Policy prior
to a change in control for all employees who have not had a termination of employment prior to the
modification or termination as long as the modification applies to all executives in the same
position category.



 









 





By signing below, you acknowledge and agree that you have carefully read this memorandum in its
entirety, that you fully understand and agree to its terms and provisions, that you are signing the
memorandum knowingly and voluntarily, and you agree that it is final and binding on all parties.




     If you have questions, please contact me. Otherwise, please sign below and return this
document to me.



     IF YOU SIGN THIS DOCUMENT BELOW, IT BECOMES A LEGALLY ENFORCEABLE AGREEMENT.



ACKNOWLEDGED AND AGREED




     I acknowledge the termination of my Employment Agreement and understand that I no longer will
be entitled to any benefits or compensation under that Agreement. Further, I understand that any
compensation or benefits that I may become entitled to receive on account of my termination of
employment will be governed by the terms of the Policy as it may be amended from time to time.



	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 
Signature

	 	 
Date
	 
	 	 
	 
Printed Name
	 	 







2
Pamela Haines <pamelahaines1 @gmail.com> 

My name is Pamela Haines. I come from Philadelphia, and I represent the Friends Economic Integrity project 

of the Philadelphia Yearly Meeting of Friends (Quakers). I also speak as a mother, a grandmother, and 

someone who has spent decades working to help small children get a good start in life to assure them a 

brighter future. Yet that work on behalf of their future may come to nothing if we continue to ignore the warning 

signs of global warming. 

If it's easy to shrug off the concerns of ordinary citizens like those in our group, I hope those who oppose this 

rule will consider the words of former Republican Secretary of the Treasury Henry Paulson, from an article from 

the June 21 New York Times: 

There is a time for weighing evidence and a time for acting. And if there's one thing I've learned 

throughout my work in finance, government and conservation, it is to act before problems become too 

big to manage. 

For too many years, we failed to rein in the excesses building up in the nation's financial markets. 

When the credit bubble burst in 2008, the damage was devastating. Millions suffered. Many still do. 

We're making the same mistake today with climate change. We're staring down a climate bubble that 

poses enormous risks to both our environment and economy. The warning signs are clear and growing 

more urgent as the risks go unchecked. 

This is a crisis we can't afford to ignore. I feel as if I'm watching as we fly in slow motion on a collision 

course toward a giant mountain. We can see the crash coming, and yet we're sitting on our hands 

rather than altering course. 

In the Friends Economic Integrity Project, we try to ask the big questions-like what is our economy for? 

Surely it is not to steadily increase the wealth and power of the wealthiest. 

Surely it is not to convince us we need things we are better off without. 

Surely it is not to maximize profits by eliminating jobs that people need. 

Surely it is not to strip the earth of resources, pollute it with wastes, and diminish its ability to sustain life. 

Humanity is facing a profound dilemma. The economies of our nation-and virtually all others-require growth 

to function. Yet our "growth economy" requires ever-increasing consumption, debt, and intrusion on the natural 

world to sustain itself. People with plenty are induced to acquire more and those in debt are induced to borrow 

more. Yet more growth makes the wealthiest even wealthier, while unemployment, hunger and violence are 

widespread. And human economies are already far larger than Earth's commonwealth of life can continue to 

support. 

How can the economic system be changed to create more jobs for people who need them, to produce fewer 

things using fewer resources, and to do less damage to the Earth? The EPA's Clean Power Plan proposed 

rule is one modest step in the direction of sanity. I hope it is the beginning of many more. 

Thank you.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

OFFICE OF THE CLERK

POST OFFICE BOX 711

MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA 36101-0711

DEBRA P. HACKETT, CLERK TELEPHONE (334) 954-3600 

 

 NOTICE OF ERROR

To: Counsel of Record

Case Style:Hamilton v. Pactiv Corporation et al (MEMBER CASE) 

Case Number: 2:06-cv-00759-LES

Referenced Docket Entry - *** Motion to Dismiss; Brief in Support & Answer to complaint - Docs.

Nos. 6,7,8

The referenced docket entries were filed electronically with ERROR on ***December 22, 2006*** 

and are being STRICKEN from the docket. This resulted in an error on the docket sheet because these

documents should have been filed in lead case 06cv83 ONLY. Please DISREGARD these docket entries.

 

 

 

 

Case 2:06-cv-00759-LES-CSC Document 9 Filed 12/27/2006 Page 1 of 2
2

 

Case 2:06-cv-00759-LES-CSC Document 9 Filed 12/27/2006 Page 2 of 2
#### In the Matter of Wesley Chapel, Inc., Respondent, v. Jan H. Van Den Hende, as Mayor of the Incorporated Village of Pomona, et al., Appellants.

Motion by appellants for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals and to stay enforcement of order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County, dated November 12, 1968, pending determination of such appeal to the Court of Appeals. Motion granted. In our opinion, questions of law have arisen which ought to be reviewed. Rabin, Acting P. J., Benjamin, Munder, Martuseello and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.
###### Editorial Note on Part 2

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

#### § 2.1509 Ex parte communications and separation of functions.

Section 2.347 applies in a legislative hearing. Section 2.348 applies in a legislative hearing only where the hearing addresses an issue certified to the Commission under § 2.335(d), and then only with respect to the underlying contested matter.
Unassociated Document


    EXHIBIT
10.23

     

    December
23, 2008

    


    Mr. James
J. Cramer

    c/o
TheStreet.com, Inc.

    14 Wall
Street, 15th
Floor

    New York,
New York  10005

     

    
      	
               
      

            	
              Re:

            	
              Employment
      Agreement, dated as of January 1, 2008 and amended as of July 30, 2008
      (the “Employment Agreement”) between TheStreet.com, Inc., (the “Company”), and James
      J. Cramer (“Cramer”)

            


    

    


    Dear
Jim:

    


    Reference
is made to the Employment Agreement.  The parties hereto wish to amend
the salary provisions contained in Section 2(a).  Capitalized terms
used and not defined herein have the same meanings ascribed to them in the
Employment Agreement.

    


    In
consideration of the foregoing and of the mutual agreements of the parties
herein contained, the parties hereby agree that this letter, when executed by
the parties, shall amend, modify and supplement the Employment Agreement as
follows:

    


    
      	
               
      

            	
              1.

            	
              By
      deleting the text in Section 2(a)(ii) that reads “One Million Five Hundred
      Sixty Thousand Dollars
($1,560,000)”

            


    

    


    
      	
               
      

            	
              And
      replacing it with the following:

            


    

    


    
      	
               
      

            	
              “One
      Million Three Hundred Thousand Dollars
  ($1,300,000)”.

            


    

    


    
      	
               
      

            	
              2.

            	
              Except
      as expressly modified, amended or supplemented by this letter agreement,
      all other terms and provisions of the Employment Agreement shall remain
      and continue unmodified in full force and
  effect.

            


    

    


    If the
foregoing accurately reflects your understanding, kindly sign this letter in the
space provided below.

     

    
      
        	 	 	      
                Best
      regards,

              	 
	 	 	 	 
	 	 	      
                THESTREET.COM,
      INC.

              	 
	 	 	 	 
	
              	
                By:
      

              	      
                /s/ Thomas
      Clarke

              	 
	 	 	      
                Thomas
      J. Clarke, Jr.

              	 
	 	 	      
                Chief
      Executive Officer

              	 


      

       

    

    AGREED
& ACCEPTED:

     

    
      
        	
                      
                  /s/ James
      Cramer

                

              	 	 	
              	 
	
                      
                  James
      J. Cramer
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION

CALVIN FLUKER, et al., )

)

Plaintiffs, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

v. ) 2:06cv785-MHT

) 

U.S. FOODSERVICE, INC., )

and U.S. FOODSERVICE, )

INC.- Montgomery Division, )

)

Defendant. )

ORDER

It is ORDERED as follows:

(1) The motion to extend deadline (doc. no. 11) is

granted.

(2) The parties are allowed until November 3, 2006,

to file their Rule 26(f) report.

DONE, this the 17th day of October, 2006.

 /s/ Myron H. Thompson 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00785-MHT-WC Document 12 Filed 10/17/2006 Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.1


   CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of SEDONA Corporation on Form
10-QSB for the quarter ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Quarterly Report"), I, Marco A.
Emrich, Chief Executive Officer of SEDONA Corporation certify, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
         (1) The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
         (2) The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
SEDONA Corporation.


Dated: May 17, 2006                      /s/ MARCO A. EMRICH
                                         --------------------------------------
                                         Marco A. Emrich
                                         President and Chief Executive Officer
                                         (Principal Executive Officer)
Editorial Note on Part 37
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 37 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

§ 37.57 Reporting of events. ( a ) The licensee shall immediately notify the LLEA after determining that an unauthorized entry resulted in an actual or attempted theft, sabotage, or diversion of a category 1 or category 2 quantity of radioactive material. As soon as possible after initiating a response, but not at the expense of causing delay or interfering with the LLEA response to the event, the licensee shall notify the NRC's Operations Center (301-816-5100). In no case shall the notification to the NRC be later than 4 hours after the discovery of any attempted or actual theft, sabotage, or diversion.
( b ) The licensee shall assess any suspicious activity related to possible theft, sabotage, or diversion of category 1 or category 2 quantities of radioactive material and notify the LLEA as appropriate. As soon as possible but not later than 4 hours after notifying the LLEA, the licensee shall notify the NRC's Operations Center (301-816-5100).
( c ) The initial telephonic notification required by paragraph (a) of this section must be followed within a period of 30 days by a written report submitted to the NRC by an appropriate method listed in § 37.7. The report must include sufficient information for NRC analysis and evaluation, including identification of any necessary corrective actions to prevent future instances.
Case 3:06-cv-00751-WKW-TFM Document 5 Filed 09/01/2006 Page 1 of 1
ie Ege ‘OSE aa

} ne PEP A
See

ee

ET a

Males

J i sis moe BOY
SRG

Py i

ae

(st IR A
}
Yy

eas aie (EGP is ‘
ees GZ 4 bf PE kage APA 704
ee ELECT MAY ;
Be EB : Z G2
} e LOE EP? 2 Zh Ying
(Bee ABLES ST Ly.

ee

t PTAA.
Ys _
a | aw)

ic Pot LW N-A3200 go
pa} if ms

BO SBS OS
Aes :

CORRECTED METERS

HUDSON CANYON NW

SCALE 1:100,000
une

AN EK ‘myeahunyuas pny,

~i-7

eee eot:/
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Agriculture

###### Forest Service

# AGENCY:

Forest Service, USDA.

# ACTION:

Notice of Meeting.

# SUMMARY:

The Del Norte Resource Advisory Committee (RAC) will meet in Crescent City, California. The committee meeting is authorized under the Secure Rural Schools and Community Self-Determination (SRS) Act (Pub. L. 110-343) and in compliance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held January 11, 2011, from 5 p.m. to 9 p.m.

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting will be held at the Del Norte County Unified School District, Redwood Room, 301 West Washington Boulevard, Crescent City, California 95531.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Adam Dellinger, Committee Coordinator, Six Rivers National Forest, at (707) 441-3569; e-mail                         *adellinger@fs.fed.us.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The meeting is open to the public. Through presentations and/or revised proposals, the public will present clarification on previously submitted Title II project proposals to the RAC. The RAC will vote on projects to recommend for funding. There will also be a public comment opportunity.

Dated: December 10, 2010.

Tyrone Kelley,

Forest Supervisor.

[FR Doc. 2010-31788 Filed 12-16-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3410-11-P
§ 429.24 Pool heaters. ( a ) *Sampling plan for selection of units for testing.* ( 1 ) The requirements of § 429.11 are applicable to pool heaters; and
( 2 ) For each basic model of pool heater a sample of sufficient size shall be randomly selected and tested to ensure that any represented value of the thermal efficiency or other measure of energy consumption of a basic model for which consumers would favor higher values shall be less than or equal to the lower of: ( i ) The mean of the sample, where: Or,
( ii ) The lower 971 ⁄ 2 percent confidence limit (LCL) of the true mean divided by 0.95, where:
( b ) *Certification reports.* ( 1 ) The requirements of § 429.12 are applicable to pool heaters; and
( 2 ) Pursuant to § 429.12(b)(13), a certification report shall include the following public product-specific information: The thermal efficiency in percent (%) and the input capacity in British thermal units per hour (Btu/h).
[76 FR 12451, Mar. 7, 2011; 76 FR 24769, May 2, 2011]
§ 20.1007 Communications. Unless otherwise specified, communications or reports concerning the regulations in this part should be addressed to the Executive Director for Operations (EDO), and sent either by mail to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001; by hand delivery to the NRC's offices at 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland; or, where practicable, by electronic submission, for example, via Electronic Information Exchange, or CD-ROM. Electronic submissions must be made in a manner that enables the NRC to receive, read, authenticate, distribute, and archive the submission, and process and retrieve it a single page at a time. Detailed guidance on making electronic submissions can be obtained by visiting the NRC's Web site at *http://www.nrc.gov/site-help/e-submittals.html ;* by e-mail to *MSHD.Resource@nrc.gov ;* or by writing the Office of the Chief Information Officer, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001. The guidance discusses, among other topics, the formats the NRC can accept, the use of electronic signatures, and the treatment of nonpublic information. [68 FR 58801, Oct. 10, 2003, as amended at 74 FR 62680, Dec. 1, 2009; 80 FR 74979, Dec. 1, 2015]
Case 2:06-mc-03334-MHT Document 3 Filed 10/04/2006 Page 1 of 9
Case 2:06-mc-03334-MHT Document 3 Filed 10/04/2006 Page 2 of 9
Case 2:06-mc-03334-MHT Document 3 Filed 10/04/2006 Page 3 of 9
Case 2:06-mc-03334-MHT Document 3 Filed 10/04/2006 Page 4 of 9
Case 2:06-mc-03334-MHT Document 3 Filed 10/04/2006 Page 5 of 9
Case 2:06-mc-03334-MHT Document 3 Filed 10/04/2006 Page 6 of 9
Case 2:06-mc-03334-MHT Document 3 Filed 10/04/2006 Page 7 of 9
Case 2:06-mc-03334-MHT Document 3 Filed 10/04/2006 Page 8 of 9
Case 2:06-mc-03334-MHT Document 3 Filed 10/04/2006 Page 9 of 9
§ 12.306 Further proceedings. ( a ) Ordinarily, the determination of an award will be made on the basis of the written record. However, on request of either the applicant or the NRC counsel, or on the adjudicative officer's own initiative, the adjudicative officer may order further proceedings, such as an informal conference, oral argument, additional written submissions or, as to issues other than substantial justification (such as the applicant's eligibility or substantiation of fees and expenses), pertinent discovery or an evidentiary hearing. Further proceedings shall be held only when necessary for full and fair resolution of the issues arising from the application, and shall be conducted as promptly as possible. Whether or not the position of the agency was substantially justified shall be determined on the basis of the administrative record, as a whole, which is made in the adversary adjudication for which fees and other expenses are sought.
( b ) A request that the adjudicative officer order further proceedings under this section shall specifically identify the information sought or the disputed issues and shall explain why the additional proceedings are necessary to resolve the issues.
RE: Felman inspection report 

Amy M. Lincoln to: Beth Friedman 

Cc: Conrad Chin, r.powell, jskonrady 

This message has been replied to and forwarded. 

2 attachments 

-,:i ~ Felman insp rept mar_12 REDACTED.pdfFelman insp rept mar_12 CONTAINS CBI.pdf 

05/23/2012 12:57 PM 

As requested, here is a final (clean) version of the document with the CBI redacted. Also attached is a 

clean copy of the confidential version for your files. This one is labeled as containing CBI and also 

corrects the "Inc." in the Subject line on page 1, which I missed in yesterday's CBI version. 

Amy M. Lincoln 

Principal 

Beverlctge &-Diamo-nd, P.C. 

456 Montgomery Street Suite 1800 

San Francisco, CA 94104 

T (415) 262-4029 - F (415) 262-4040 

Alincoln@bdlaw.com 

BEVERIDGE~ 

&DIAMOND~ CONFIDENTIALITY STATEMENT: This electronic message contains information from the law firm 

of Beveridge & Diamond, P .C. and may be confidential or privileged. The information is intended 

solely for the use of the individual(s) or entity(ies) named above. If you are not the intended 

recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this message 

is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately by telephone at 

(202) 789-6000 or by e-mail reply and delete this message. Thank you . 

IRS CIRCULAR 230 DISCLOSURE: To the extent that tax advice is contained in this 

correspondence or any attachment hereto, you are advised that such tax advice is not intended to 

be used, and cannot be used for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue 

Code, or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party the tax advice contained 

herein. 

Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail. 

From: Beth Friedman [mailto:friedman.beth@ecrweb.com] 

Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2012 6:17AM 

To: Amy M. Lincoln 

Cc: Chin.Conrad@epamail.epa.gov 

Subject: FW: Felman inspection report 

AmyCould you please send us a final nonconfidential version that has the CBI redacted? 

I will enter the confidential version into the CBI files. 

Beth 

From: Conrad Chin [mailto:Chin.Conrad@epamail.epa.gov]
EXHIBIT 32.2 - CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT
               TO RULE 13a-14(b)



In connection with the Quarter Report of Gallery of History, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Rod Lynam, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:

1.	 The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
Sections 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



/s/ Rod Lynam
Rod Lynam
Chief Financial Officer

August 14, 2009