alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                        5

<LEGEND>
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                    0000764839
<NAME>                   Water Chef Inc.,
<MULTIPLIER>             1
<CURRENCY>               U.S.DOLLARS

<S>                      <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>             6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                            JUN-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                         1
<CASH>                                  53,571
<SECURITIES>                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                           182
<ALLOWANCES>                            0
<INVENTORY>                             115,614
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        172,979
<PP&E>                                  385,510
<DEPRECIATION>                          (370,716)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          255,675
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   2,413,878
<BONDS>                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                             146
<COMMON>                                62,708
<OTHER-SE>                              (2,221,057)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            255,675
<SALES>                                 115,412
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        115,412
<CGS>                                   75,034
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           75,034
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        574,361
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      56,930
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         (626,338)
<INCOME-TAX>                            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     (626,338)
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         2,074,293
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                            1,447,955
<EPS-BASIC>                             (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                           (0.03)


</TABLE>
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A22A0029. SHANITA MATTHEWS v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF

LABOR.

On April 8, 2021, the superior court entered an order affirming the decision of

the Georgia Department of Labor, which denied Shanita Matthews’s claim for

benefits.Matthewsthen filed both an application for discretionary appeal and a notice

of appeal. We denied Matthews’s discretionary application on the merits. See Case

No. A21D0399 (Aug. 10, 2021). This is the direct appeal. 

This Court’s denial of Matthews’s discretionary application constitutes a

decision on the merits. See Elrod v. Sunflower Meadows Dev., LLC, 322 Ga. App.

666, 670 (4) (745 SE2d 846) (2013) (“[W]hen this Court examines a request for a

discretionary appeal, it acts in an error-correcting mode such that a denial of the

application is on the merits, and the order denying the application is res judicata with

respect to the substance of the requested review.”) (punctuation omitted). Thus, the

doctrine of res judicata bars this direct appeal from the same order. See Hook v.

Bergen, 286 Ga. App. 258, 261 (1) (649 SE2d 313) (2007); Northwest Social &Civic

Club v. Franklin, 276 Ga. 859, 860 (583 SE2d 858) (2003).This direct appeal is

therefore DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

August 12, 2021

08/12/2021
Case 3:06-cv-00663-MHT-DRB Document 11 Filed 11/02/2006 Page 1 of 2
Case 3:06-cv-00663-MHT-DRB Document 11 Filed 11/02/2006 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 337 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 337

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                         June 23, 2005.
    Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker 
may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XVIII, declare the House resolved into the 
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of the 
bill (H.R. 3010) making appropriations for the Departments of Labor, Health and 
Human Services, and Education, and Related Agencies for the fiscal year ending 
September 30, 2006, and for other purposes. The first reading of the bill shall 
be dispensed with. All points of order against consideration of the bill are 
waived. General debate shall be confined to the bill and shall not exceed one 
hour equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member 
of the Committee on Appropriations. After general debate the bill shall be 
considered for amendment under the five-minute rule. Points of order against 
provisions in the bill for failure to comply with clause 2 of rule XXI are 
waived except for section 511. During consideration of the bill for amendment, 
the Chairman of the Committee of the Whole may accord priority in recognition on 
the basis of whether the Member offering an amendment has caused it to be 
printed in the portion of the Congressional Record designated for that purpose 
in clause 8 of rule XVIII. Amendments so printed shall be considered as read. 
When the Committee rises and reports the bill back to the House with a 
recommendation that the bill do pass, the previous question shall be considered 
as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to final passage without 
intervening motion except one motion to recommit with or without instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Case 1:06-cr-00201-WHA-CSC Document 57 Filed 05/31/2007 Page 1 of 6
Case 1:06-cr-00201-WHA-CSC Document 57 Filed 05/31/2007 Page 2 of 6
Case 1:06-cr-00201-WHA-CSC Document 57 Filed 05/31/2007 Page 3 of 6
Case 1:06-cr-00201-WHA-CSC Document 57 Filed 05/31/2007 Page 4 of 6
Case 1:06-cr-00201-WHA-CSC Document 57 Filed 05/31/2007 Page 5 of 6
Case 1:06-cr-00201-WHA-CSC Document 57 Filed 05/31/2007 Page 6 of 6
**UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY** NATIONAL VEHICLE AND FUEL EMISSIONS LABORATORY

2000 TRAVERWOOD ROAD ANN ARBOR, MI 48105 - 2498 OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION July 18 , 2011 MEMORANDUM SUBJECT: Meeting with GM on April 13, 2011 FROM: Don Kopinski TO: Docket EPA - HQ - OAR- 2010 - 0162 This memorandum documents a meeting held on April 13 , 2011 b etween GM , NHTSA, and EPA staff. The following people attended : GM : Barbara Kiss, Steve Fornetti EPA: By ron Bunker, Angel a Cullen, Tony Fernandez, Houshun Zhang, Bob Peavy house, and Don Kopinski NHTSA: Coralie Cooper (phone) The discussion focused on HD GHG and fuel consumption provisions concerning incomplete vehicles, loose engines, and ADFEs.
Subpart 1236.5—Contract Clauses

Parent topic: PART 1236—CONSTRUCTION AND ARCHITECT-ENGINEER CONTRACTS

1236.570 Special precautions for work at operating airports.

Where any acquisition will require work at an operating airport, insert the clause at 1252.236–70,

Special Precautions for Work at Operating Airports, in solicitations and contracts.
###### Editorial Note on Part 420

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 420 appear at 64 FR 46114, Aug. 24, 1999.

#### § 420.4 Technical assistance.

At the request of the Governor of any State to DOE and subject to the availability of personnel and funds, DOE will provide information and technical assistance to the State in connection with effectuating the purposes of this part.
PGI 204.1103 Procedures.

The System for Award Management (SAM) website at http://www.acquisition.gov/ provides useful

documents and on-line training to assist with SAM navigation and data entry. User Guides and

Demonstration Videos can be found in the User Help section after clicking the HELP link at the top

of the website homepage. The former Central Contractor Registration and Online Representations

and Certifications Application data can be located in the Entity Management area of SAM which can

be accessed by navigating the following path after logging into the SAM website. Select Tab -

MYSAM, Tab - Data Access and Tab - Entity Management

(i) Use the SAM database as the primary source of contractor information for contract award and

administration, to include supporting contract writing, management, and administration systems. Do

not request or use contractor information from other sources, unless another source is specifically

authorized. At a minimum, supporting systems shall use the SAM database as the authoritative

source for the following data elements, as applicable by system, when SAM is required in

accordance with FAR Subpart 4.11:

(A) Data Universal Number System (DUNS) Number.

(B) DUNS+4 Number.

(C) Commercial and Government Entity (CAGE) Code.

(D) Taxpayer Identification Number (TIN).

(E) Legal Business Name.

(F) Doing Business As (DBA) Name.

(G) Physical Address.

(H) Mailing Address.

(I) Electronic Funds Transfer (EFT) information (includes American Banking Association (ABA)

Routing Number, Account Number, and Account Type).

(ii) Ensure that SAM non-disclosure requirements regarding TIN and EFT information are followed.

Parent topic: PGI 204.11 -SYSTEM FOR AWARD MANAGEMENT
§ 429.40 Candelabra base incandescent lamps and intermediate base incandescent lamps. ( a ) *Sampling plan for selection of units for testing.* ( 1 ) The requirements of § 429.11 are applicable to candelabra base incandescent lamps; and
( 2 ) For each basic model of candelabra base incandescent lamp and intermediate base incandescent lamp, a minimum sample of 21 lamps shall be randomly selected and tested. Any represented value of lamp wattage of a basic model shall be based on the sample and shall be less than or equal to the lower of: ( i ) The mean of the sample, where: Or,
( ii ) The lower 97.5 percent confidence limit (LCL) of the true mean divided by 0.95, where:
( b ) *Certification reports.* ( 1 ) The requirements of § 429.12 are applicable to candelabra base and intermediate base incandescent lamps; and
( 2 ) Pursuant to § 429.12(b)(13), a certification report shall include the following public product-specific information: ( i ) Candelabra base incandescent lamp: The rated wattage in watts (W).
( ii ) Intermediate base incandescent lamp: The rated wattage in watts (W).
[76 FR 12451, Mar. 7, 2011; 76 FR 24774, May 2, 2011]
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-18-00541-CR

IN RE Wilbert P. STEWART

Original Mandamus Proceeding1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Irene Rios, Justice

Delivered and Filed: August 15, 2018

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION

Relator complains of the trial court’s denial of his motion for judgment nunc pro tunc by 

which he sought to correct an alleged error in flat-time credit. The Court of Criminal Appeals has 

exclusive jurisdiction to grant postconviction relief from an otherwise final felony conviction. 

TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 11.07 § 5 (West 2015); Board of Pardons & Paroles ex rel. 

Keene v. Court of Appeals for Eighth Dist., 910 S.W.2d 481, 483 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995) (orig. 

proceeding) (per curiam). This includes matters relating to flat-time credit. See, e.g., Ex parte 

Lee, 223 S.W.3d 360, 360-61 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006) (orig. proceeding) (per curiam). Because 

the proper avenue for resolving the issue is by application for writ of habeas corpus as authorized 

 1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 1993-CR-0145, styled The State of Texas v. Wilbert P. Stewart, pending in 

the 226th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Sid L. Harle presiding.
04-18-00541-CR

- 2 -

by article 11.07, we dismiss relator’s petition for writ of mandamus for lack of jurisdiction. See 

TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).

PER CURIAM

Do not publish
#### KIECHLIN, Appellant, v. NASSAU ELECTRIC R. CO., Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

July 31, 1914.)

Action by Henry Kiechlin against the Nassau Electric Railroad Company.

No opinion. Judgment reversed, and new trial granted, costs to abide the event. See Brengel v. Hicks, 157 App. Div. 934, 142 N. Y. Supp. 110.
EXHIBIT 32

                  Certification of Chief Executive Officer and
            Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 8 U.S.C. Section 1350
      as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

                                  CERTIFICATION

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Water Chef, Inc., a Delaware
corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ended June 30, 2007
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350 as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge and upon a review
of the Report that:

     (1) the Report of the Company filed today pursuant to Section 13(a) of the
     Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), fully
     complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act; and

     (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.

This certification is based upon, among other things, my responsibilities as
Chief Executive Officer, my own due diligence and representations made by
certain members of the Company's senior management.


Dated: August 13, 2007
                                            /s/  Leslie J. Kessler
                                            -----------------------------------
                                                 Leslie J. Kessler
                                                 President,
                                                 Chief Executive Officer, and
                                                 Chief Financial Officer
§ 20.1005 Units of radioactivity. For the purposes of this part, activity is expressed in the special unit of curies (Ci) or in the SI unit of becquerels (Bq), or their multiples, or disintegrations (transformations) per unit of time. ( a ) One becquerel = 1 disintegration per second (s−1).
( b ) One curie = 3.7 × 1010 disintegrations per second = 3.7 × 1010 becquerels = 2.22 × 1012 disintegrations per minute.
[56 FR 23391, May 21, 1991; 56 FR 61352, Dec. 3, 1991]
§ 490.303 Who must comply. ( a ) Except as provided by paragraph (b) of this section, a covered person must comply with the requirements of this subpart if that person is— ( 1 ) A covered person whose principal business is producing, storing, refining, processing, transporting, distributing, importing or selling at wholesale or retail any alternative fuel other than electricity; or
( 2 ) A covered person whose principal business is generating, transmitting, importing, or selling, at wholesale or retail, electricity; or
( 3 ) A covered person— ( i ) Who produces, imports, or produces and imports in combination, an average of 50,000 barrels per day or more of petroleum; and
( ii ) A substantial portion of whose business is producing alternative fuels.
( b ) This subpart does not apply to a covered person or affiliate, division, or other business unit of such person whose principal business is— ( 1 ) transforming alternative fuels into a product that is not an alternative fuel; or
( 2 ) consuming alternative fuels as a feedstock or fuel in the manufacture of a product that is not an alternative fuel.
#### KAPLAN et al., Appellants, v. FEINSTEIN et al., Respondents.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

July 31, 1914.)

Action by Samuel Kaplan and others, copartners, etc., against David Feinstein and another.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment and order reversed, and new trial granted, costs to, abide the event, on the grounds, first, that it affirmatively appears that the terms of the composition agreement were varied from by the defendants without the consent of the plaintiffs and it does not appear that plaintiffs waived strict performance thereof; and, second, there is not a fair preponderance of evidence of tender of performance of such agreement to plaintiffs on the part either of defendants or the United Novelty Company.
###### Editorial Note on Part 4

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 4 appear at 77 FR 39904, July 6, 2012.

#### § 4.502 Application.

This part applies to all programs or activities conducted by the agency.
IV 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 320

Congratulating Danica Patrick on her historic accomplishments in the 2005 

Indianapolis 500. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 15, 2005

Mr. MANZULLO submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Government Reform 

RESOLUTION

Congratulating Danica Patrick on her historic 

accomplishments in the 2005 Indianapolis 500.

Whereas Danica Patrick was raised in Roscoe, Illinois, began 

racing go-karts at age 10, and by the age of 12 became 

a national champion of the World Karting Association; 

Whereas at age 16, Danica Patrick switched from go-karts 

to formula cars and began competing in the Formula 

Vauxhall Winter Series in England; 

Whereas in 2000, Danica Patrick finished second in the Formula Ford Festival in England, the highest finish ever by 

an American driver; 

Whereas on May 15, 2005, Danica Patrick qualified for the 

Indianapolis 500 with the fourth fastest time, becoming 
2 

•HRES 320 IH 

the highest qualifying female driver in the history of the 

event; 

Whereas on May 29, 2005, Danica Patrick competed in her 

first Indianapolis 500 race; 

Whereas Danica Patrick’s appearance in the 2005 Indianapolis 500 was just her fifth overall appearance in an Indy 

Racing League IndyCar Series race; 

Whereas on lap 57, Danica Patrick became the first woman 

ever to lead a lap of the Indianapolis 500; 

Whereas Danica Patrick battled setbacks to move from sixteenth place after lap 80 to first place on lap 172; 

Whereas Danica Patrick led the 2005 Indianapolis 500 at 3 

different times during the race for a total of 19 laps; 

Whereas Danica Patrick’s fourth place finish in the Indianapolis 500 was the all-time highest finish by a rookie driver 

and the all-time highest finish by a female driver; 

Whereas Danica Patrick was awarded the 2005 Indianapolis 

500 Rookie of the Year award; and 

Whereas at only 23 years of age, Danica Patrick has already 

made historic achievements as a professional driver: Now 

therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) congratulates Danica Patrick on her his3 toric accomplishments in the 2005 Indianapolis 500; 

4 (2) invites Danica Patrick and her team to the 

5 United States Capitol to be honored; and 
3

•HRES 320 IH 

1 (3) directs the Clerk of the House of Represent2 atives to make available an enrolled copy of this res3 olution to Danica Patrick for appropriate display.

Æ
#### § 431.87 Energy conservation standards and their effective dates.

(a) Each commercial packaged boiler listed in table 1 of this [paragraph (a)](/on/2024-09-17/title-10/section-431.87#p-431.87(a)) and manufactured on or after the effective date listed must meet the indicated energy conservation standard.

Table 1 to Paragraph (a)—Commercial Packaged Boiler Energy Conservation Standards

| Equipment category | Subcategory | Certified rated input | Efficiency level—effective date: March 2, 2012 \* |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Hot Water Commercial Packaged Boilers | Gas-fired | ≥300,000 Btu/h and ≤2,500,000 Btu/h | 80.0% ET. |
| Hot Water Commercial Packaged Boilers | Gas-fired | >2,500,000 Btu/h | 82.0% EC. |
| Hot Water Commercial Packaged Boilers | Oil-fired | ≥300,000 Btu/h and ≤2,500,000 Btu/h | 82.0% ET. |
| Hot Water Commercial Packaged Boilers | Oil-fired | >2,500,000 Btu/h | 84.0% EC. |
| Steam Commercial Packaged Boilers | Gas-fired, all, except natural draft | ≥300,000 Btu/h and ≤2,500,000 Btu/h | 79.0% ET. |
| Steam Commercial Packaged Boilers | Gas-fired, all, except natural draft | >2,500,000 Btu/h | 79.0% ET. |
| Steam Commercial Packaged Boilers | Gas-fired—natural draft | ≥300,000 Btu/h and ≤2,500,000 Btu/h | 77.0% ET. |
| Steam Commercial Packaged Boilers | Gas-fired—natural draft | >2,500,000 Btu/h | 77.0% ET. |
| Steam Commercial Packaged Boilers | Oil-fired | ≥300,000 Btu/h and ≤2,500,000 Btu/h | 81.0% ET. |
| Steam Commercial Packaged Boilers | Oil-fired | >2,500,000 Btu/h | 81.0% ET. |
| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| \* Where EC is combustion efficiency and ET is thermal efficiency. | | | |

(b) Each commercial packaged boiler listed in table 2 of this [paragraph (b)](/on/2024-09-17/title-10/section-431.87#p-431.87(b)) and manufactured on or after the effective date listed in Table 2 must meet the indicated energy conservation standard.

Table 2 to Paragraph (b)—Commercial Packaged Boiler Energy Conservation Standards

| Equipment category | Subcategory | Certified rated input | Efficiency level—effective date: March 2, 2022 \* |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Steam Commercial Packaged Boilers | Gas-fired—natural draft | ≥300,000 Btu/h and ≤2,500,000 Btu/h | 79.0% ET. |
| Steam Commercial Packaged Boilers | Gas-fired—natural draft | >2,500,000 Btu/h | 79.0% ET. |
| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| \* Where ET is thermal efficiency. | | | |

[[88 FR 64352](https://www.federalregister.gov/citation/88-FR-64352), Sept. 19, 2023]
IV 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 447 

Permitting the use of the frank for mailings which include solicitations for 

charities responding to a major disaster which is the subject of a Presidential declaration under the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and 

Emergency Assistance Act. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 15, 2005 

Mr. BROWN of Ohio (for himself, Ms. MILLENDER-MCDONALD, and Ms. 

SLAUGHTER) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 

the Committee on House Administration, and in addition to the Committee on Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions 

as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

RESOLUTION 

Permitting the use of the frank for mailings which include 

solicitations for charities responding to a major disaster 

which is the subject of a Presidential declaration under 

the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency 

Assistance Act. 

1 Resolved, That in applying the requirements of sec2 tion 3210(a) of title 39, United States Code, to a mailing 

3 by a Member of the House of Representatives (including 

4 a Delegate or Resident Commissioner to the Congress), 

5 the House Commission on Congressional Mailing Stand-
2 

•HRES 447 IH 

1 ards may not find that the mailing is not frankable solely 

2 because it includes a solicitation of funds for or on behalf 

3 of an entity for the purpose of supporting relief efforts 

4 and activities in response to a major disaster for which 

5 the President has made a declaration under title IV of 

6 the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency As7 sistance Act (or, in the case of a mailing sent electroni8 cally, includes a link to such a solicitation on an Internet 

9 site), if the entity is included in the list of relief organiza10 tions responding to the disaster which is maintained or 

11 referred to in official notices of the Federal Emergency 

12 Management Agency. 

Æ