alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| (logo) WELLS  

            FARGO | Corporate Trust Services

 

MAC R1204-010

9062 Old Annapolis Road

Columbia, MD 21045

 

Tel: 410 884 2000

Fax: 410 715 2380 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

 

 

 

GS Mortgage Securities Corporation II

200 West Street

New York, New York 10282

 

 

 

 

RE: Annual Statement of Compliance for GS Mortgage Securities Corporation II, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2013-GC10

 

 

Per the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of February 1, 2013 (the "Agreement"), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Certificate Administrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2014 (the "Reporting Period"):

 

 

(a) A review of Wells Fargo's activities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under such officer's supervision; and

 

(b) To the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

 

 

February 24, 2015 

 

 

 

  /s/ Brian Smith

  BRIAN SMITH

  Vice President

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
§ 503.12 Terms and conditions; compliance plans. ( a ) *Terms and conditions generally.* A petitioner must comply with any terms and conditions imposed upon the grant of an exemption petition. OFE will limit any such terms and conditions to the unit(s) which is the subject of the petition.
( b ) *Compliance plans for temporary exemptions.* ( 1 ) Any compliance plan required to accompany a petition for a temporary exemption shall include the following: ( i ) A detailed schedule of progressive events and the dates upon which the events are to take place, indicating how compliance with the applicable prohibitions of the Act will occur;
( ii ) Evidence of binding contracts for fuel, or for facilities for the production of fuel, which are required for compliance with the applicable prohibitions of the Act;
( iii ) A schedule indicating how any necessary permits and approvals required to burn an alternate fuel will be obtained; and
( iv ) Any other documentary evidence which indicates an ability to comply with the applicable prohibitions of the Act.
( 2 ) Any exemption for which a compliance plan is required shall not be effective until the compliance plan is approved by DOE.
( 3 ) If the petition is granted, an updated, duly executed plan must be submitted to OFE within one (1) month of an alteration of any milestone in the compliance plan, together with the reasons for the alteration and its impact upon the scheduling of all other milestones in the plan.
#### In the Matter of Robert Conroy et al., Appellants, v State Committee of the Independence Party of New York et al., Respondents.

Submitted October 15, 2007;

decided November 27, 2007

Reported below, 43 AD3d 834.

On the Court’s own motion, appeal dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that no substantial constitutional question is directly involved. Motion for leave to appeal granted.
IV 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 290

Recognizing and appreciating the historical significance and the heroic human 

endeavor and sacrifice of the people of Crete during World War II 

and commending the PanCretan Association of America. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 19, 2005

Mrs. MALONEY (for herself, Mr. BILIRAKIS, Mr. PALLONE, Mr. PAYNE, Mr. 

FOLEY, Ms. NORTON, Ms. WATSON, Mr. CROWLEY, and Mr. MCGOVERN) 

submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee 

on International Relations 

RESOLUTION

Recognizing and appreciating the historical significance and 

the heroic human endeavor and sacrifice of the people 

of Crete during World War II and commending the 

PanCretan Association of America.

Whereas 2005 marks the 64th anniversary of the heroic Battle of Crete, which took place on the Greek island of 

Crete during World War II between Nazi German forces 

and the people of Crete assisted by the Allied armies; 

Whereas the people of Crete fought tenaciously during the 

Battle of Crete, delaying for two months the Nazi German invasion of Russia; 

Whereas this delay forced Nazi German forces to invade Russia in the face of the brutal Russian winter, changing the 
2

•HRES 290 IH 

final outcome of World War II and leading to the defeat 

of fascism; 

Whereas many historians agree that the Battle of Crete was 

one of the most significant battles of World War II; 

Whereas the Battle of Crete contributed to saving the free 

world from Nazi German occupation, thus preserving democracy, freedom, and human dignity; 

Whereas the Cretan Resistance Movement was organized to 

fight the Nazi German occupation of the island of Crete; 

Whereas for 4 years, the Cretan Resistance Movement inflicted heavy casualties upon Nazi German forces, including kidnaping a heavily-guarded Nazi German General, 

setting an example for all of the people of Europe to follow; 

Whereas the people of Crete suffered savage reprisals for 

their heroic resistance when the Nazi German invaders 

randomly executed thousands of civilians and burned and 

destroyed entire communities; 

Whereas many participants in the Battle of Crete and the 

Cretan Resistance Movement later emigrated to the 

United States and became American citizens; and 

Whereas many of these citizens became members of the 

PanCretan Association of America, an organization comprised of Greek Americans with ancestry from the island 

of Crete and committed to preserving and promoting the 

rich culture and proud history of Crete: Now, therefore, 

be it

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

2 (1) observes the memory of the fallen heroes of 

3 the Battle of Crete; 
3

•HRES 290 IH 

1 (2) honors the living men and women of Crete 

2 who, during World War II, fought an oppressive in3 vader to preserve the ideals of freedom, democracy, 

4 and the pursuit of happiness; and 

5 (3) commends the PanCretan Association of 

6 America for preserving and promoting the history of 

7 Crete and its people.

Æ
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Bashon Taylor, Appellant.

[813 NYS2d 678]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lewis, J.), rendered October 22, 2003, convicting him of assault in the second degree, and assault in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

*714Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant failed to preserve for appellate review his contentions that the trial court failed to admonish the jury not to discuss the case during an overnight recess, and that it failed to timely and meaningfully respond to certain jury notes *(see*CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Bonaparte,*78 NY2d 26, 32 [1991]; *cf. People v Agramonte,*87 NY2d 765, 771 [1996]). In any event, to the extent that these contentions may be reviewed on the record presented, they are without merit.

The defendant failed to preserve for appellate review his contention that the testimony of two witnesses for the prosecution constituted implicit bolstering in violation of *People v Trowbridge*(305 NY 471 [1953]; *see*CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Vanier,*255 AD2d 610 [1998]). In any event, any error was harmless in light of the strong circumstantial evidence of the defendant’s identity as the assailant *(see People v Tinsley,*159 AD2d 602 [1990]). Similarly, the defendant’s contention that the trial court failed to adequately instruct the jury on the issue of identification is unpreserved for appellate review and, in any event, is without merit *(see*CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Nimmons,*222 AD2d 704 [1995]; *People v Moore,*159 AD2d 521 [1990]).

The defendant failed to preserve for appellate review his contentions that the indictment was impermissibly amended to charge a new crime and that the evidence was legally insufficient to support his conviction of assault in the second degree *(see*CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Harvey,*212 AD2d 730 [1995]). Further, we decline to reach the issue of the legal sufficiency of the evidence on that count in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction *(see*CPL 470.15 [3] [c]; *People v Scott,*24 AD3d 800 [2005]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions, including those raised in his supplemental pro se brief, are without merit. Ritter, J.P., Luciano, Fisher and Lifson, JJ., concur.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Shameek Harrison, Appellant.

[814 NYS2d 870]

Judgment of resentence, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles Solomon, J.), rendered July 29, 2005, resentencing defendant, upon his conviction after a jury trial of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the first degree, as a second felony offender, to a term of 12V2 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s argument that he is entitled to reduction of his conviction to second-degree possession based on the change in the applicable weight requirement for first-degree possession under pertinent sections of the Drug Law Reform Act (L 2004, ch 738, §§ 21-22) is meritless *(People v Quinones,*22 AD3d 218 [2005], *lv denied*6 NY3d 817 [2006]; *see also People v Nelson,*21 AD3d 861 [2005], *lv granted*6 NY3d 757 [2005]). Defendant’s constitutional challenge to the procedure under which he was adjudicated a second felony offender is also without merit *(see Almendarez-Torres v United States,*523 US 224 [1998]). We perceive no basis for reducing defendant’s new sentence. Concur—Buckley, P.J., Andrias, Marlow, Nardelli and Catterson, JJ.
Case 2:06-cv-00765-ID-CSC Document 3 Filed 10/03/2006 Page 1 of 6
Case 2:06-cv-00765-ID-CSC Document 3 Filed 10/03/2006 Page 2 of 6
Case 2:06-cv-00765-ID-CSC Document 3 Filed 10/03/2006 Page 3 of 6
Case 2:06-cv-00765-ID-CSC Document 3 Filed 10/03/2006 Page 4 of 6
Case 2:06-cv-00765-ID-CSC Document 3 Filed 10/03/2006 Page 5 of 6
Case 2:06-cv-00765-ID-CSC Document 3 Filed 10/03/2006 Page 6 of 6
§ 52.4 Deliberate misconduct. ( a ) *Applicability.* This section applies to any: ( 1 ) Licensee;
( 2 ) Holder of a standard design approval;
( 3 ) Applicant for a standard design certification;
( 4 ) Applicant for a license or permit;
( 5 ) Applicant for a standard design approval;
( 6 ) Employee of a licensee;
( 7 ) Employee of an applicant for a license, a standard design certification, or a standard design approval;
( 8 ) Any contractor (including a supplier or consultant), subcontractor, or employee of a contractor or subcontractor of any licensee; or
( 9 ) Any contractor (including a supplier or consultant), subcontractor, or employee of a contractor or subcontractor of any applicant for a license, a standard design certification, or a standard design approval.
( b ) *Definitions.* For purposes of this section: *Deliberate misconduct* means an intentional act or omission that a person or entity knows: ( i ) Would cause a licensee or an applicant for a license, standard design certification, or standard design approval to be in violation of any rule, regulation, or order; or any term, condition, or limitation, of any license, standard design certification, or standard design approval; or
( ii ) Constitutes a violation of a requirement, procedure, instruction, contract, purchase order, or policy of a licensee, holder of a standard design approval, applicant for a license, standard design certification, or standard design approval, or contractor, or subcontractor.
( c ) *Prohibition against deliberate misconduct.* Any person or entity subject to this section, who knowingly provides to any licensee, any applicant for a license, standard design certification or standard design approval, or a contractor, or subcontractor of a person or entity subject to this section, any components, equipment, materials, or other goods or services that relate to a licensee's or applicant's activities under this part, may not: ( 1 ) Engage in deliberate misconduct that causes or would have caused, if not detected, a licensee, holder of a standard design approval, or applicant to be in violation of any rule, regulation, or order; or any term, condition, or limitation of any license issued by the Commission, any standard design approval, or standard design certification; or
( 2 ) Deliberately submit to the NRC; a licensee, an applicant for a license, standard design certification or standard design approval; or a licensee's, standard design approval holder's, or applicant's contractor or subcontractor, information that the person submitting the information knows to be incomplete or inaccurate in some respect material to the NRC.
( d ) A person or entity who violates paragraph (c)(1) or (c)(2) of this section may be subject to enforcement action in accordance with the procedures in 10 CFR part 2, subpart B.
Exhibit 8.1

**MATERIAL SUBSIDIARIES**

Our operations are conducted principally byAmbev, and, in the case of our CAC, Latin America South and Canadianoperations, by direct and indirect subsidiaries of Ambev.  The following is alist of the significant companies that Ambev controlled, either directly orindirectly, as of December 31, 2016:  

1.                  The Company indirectly owns 100% of the economicand voting interests in Cerveceria Y Malteria Quilmes Saica Y G (incorporatedin Argentina).

2.                  The Company indirectly owns 85.67% of theeconomic and voting interests in Cerveceria Boliviana Nacional S.A.(incorporated in Bolivia).

3.                  The Company, directly and indirectly, owns 100%of the economic and voting interests in Arosuco Aromas e Sucos Ltda.(incorporated in Brazil).  

4.                  The Company, directly and indirectly, owns 100%of the economic and voting interests in CRBS S.A (incorporated in Brazil).

5.                  The Company directly owns 86.42% of the economicand voting interests in Cervejaria ZX S.A. (incorporated in Brazil).

6.                  The Company indirectly owns 100% of LabattBrewing Co. Ltd. (incorporated in Canada).  

7.                  The Company indirectly owns 100% of the economicand voting interests in Cerveceria Chile S.A. (incorporated in Chile).

8.                  The Company indirectly owns 55.0% of theeconomic and voting interests in Cervecería Nacional Dominicana S.A.(incorporated in Dominican Republic).

9.                  The Company indirectly owns 50.0% of theeconomic and voting interests in Industrias Del Atlántico, Sociedad Anónima(incorporated in Guatemala).

10.               The Company directly owns 100% of the economicand voting interests in Ambev Luxembourg S.à R.L. (incorporated in Luxembourg).

11.               The Company, directly and indirectly, owns 100%of the economic and voting interests in Cervecería Nacional S. de R.L.(incorporated in Panama).  

12.               The Company indirectly owns 87.35% of theeconomic and voting interests in Cerveceria Paraguaya S.A. (incorporated inParaguay).

13.               The Company directly owns 100% of the economicand voting interests in Jalua Spain S.L. (incorporated in Spain).  

14.               The Company indirectly owns 100% of the economicand voting interests in Monthiers S.A. (incorporated in Uruguay).  

15.               The Company indirectly owns 100% of the economicand voting interests in Linthal S.A., (incorporated in Uruguay).

16.               The Company indirectly owns 99.93% of theeconomic and voting interests in Cerveceria Y Malteria Payssandú S.A.(incorporated in Uruguay).
§ 429.31 Urinals. ( a ) *Sampling plan for selection of units for testing.* ( 1 ) The requirements of § 429.11 are applicable to urinals; and
( 2 ) For each basic model of urinal, a sample of sufficient size shall be randomly selected and tested to ensure that any represented value of water consumption of a basic model for which consumers favor lower values shall be greater than or equal to the higher of: ( i ) The mean of the sample, where: Or,
( ii ) The upper 90 percent confidence limit (UCL) of the true mean divided by 1.1, where:
( b ) *Certification reports.* ( 1 ) The requirements of § 429.12 are applicable to urinals; and
( 2 ) Pursuant to § 429.12(b)(13), a certification report shall include the following public product-specific information: The maximum water use in gallons per flush (gpf), rounded to the nearest 0.01 gallon, and for trough-type urinals, the maximum flow rate in gallons per minute (gpm), rounded to the nearest 0.01 gallon, and the length of the trough in inches (in).
[76 FR 12451, Mar. 7, 2011; 76 FR 24771, May 2, 2011, as amended at 78 FR 62986, Oct. 23, 2013]
#### In re CAFFREY.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department).

February 11, 1915.)

In the matter of Peter Caffrey, deceased.

PER CURIAM.

Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Order filed.

INGRAHAM, P. J., and McLAUGHLIN, J., dissent.
# 2413.505 Purchase order and related forms.

**Parent topic:**Subpart 2413.5 - Purchase Orders
OFFICE OFTHE ATTORNEY GENERAL OFTEXAS 

AUSTIN 
i%Rt@ ~~pRl'tCl@At Of mUO8tiOA, i%lgb 2 

of the State oalled bitho State Superintendent 

for lnstruotions in m,?crli to standcrdizatlon, classifioation; accrodltiw of sch.ools, and the dlotribution of tha a$~lizatioX fWd; and 

"4. .An nssozbly oft sohool o:flcifis, et =hloh 

eA eriployee of t&3 stnto RopRrtmnt or education 

i5 oooiened to give inatructio;lL1, to interpret depRmnt* nllcs, ret;&lations, and poliaics, end 

to discuss other matters of acW.&+tration, pertain- 

,3.x1&$ to or dlreoted by law." 

Obviously it could not have been izito~dsd by tho 

Leglslaturs thYzt the restrlctlon against >ayinfi tratrellq expcnaoo to.convontionshould a;P:Ay to nutlwrizad.ncotinge 

onll& by a~:oncltm or ~ovormont for tha purpose or acwaplishin~ the Omotiona of a;ovarzmnt lqoend upon Ghem. TO 

C>ply SUCh L? CO.%tZWTtlOIl XGUld k0 t0 ki>Uti, t0 ti0 Le~f5laVXI-Q tha intanti to >asz~lyzo by indiroctlon +,&a atiinlatration 

OS t!m wry affnirs of ~ovammnt for which n>xo2riations. 

WCM mdo at l.on@h ia kk+zmto ?Xll 427 of the 46th Lo,~J~latue, Go nra iqmlledI t'~arefore, to the ooncLusio~ Uat 

the Leginlctwe uaod tha wrd s'convention*~ in its cspccirl 

.or pog'ular, ratbar than its broad, si~ifioance, coavvoyir;g 

the idos , ~;cnenlly, of a 2;eetixg of m&ers or dele~gtes; 

of a private or.~anization, party, olub, oooietg, or the like, 

for tba accoznplish.%ant of sow ~ozzon object. 

:q?lyine the above.dsfinitLon to the altuations 

presented by.you, in thair numrical 03ku?; we. adviaer 

1. The truvel.In~ axgerse rider qmtad in yo*u: 

latter does not ?ravazt reizbursment for tx-avoling oxgansas 

of a State ez@oyae, in tha first eitustion pranented by yoU. 

2. The tmvelins ex$anse ridor quoted In your 

latter doas.not pavvent roinbursezcnt for trm3linZ axpmses 

Incurred by a Litits enployoa, in the second situation presented by yoU. 

3. The tmvolin,~ ox~cnm ridor c,xoted in your 

letter doas not pcrpont ro+k2burnmant SOS tmvolin,?, axgensae 

immred b; R stato fmployao, in th3 third situation greminted by yw. 
Btato Ds~artmnt of Education, Pa&% 3. 

4, fn 7our fourth oitmtion, aufr’laiez% details 

am not givm US -4th rorgrd to the mtura of the aoao~bl7 

of school. officials, to caable us to detcminc whether suoh 

esnemblg of aahool 0iYloialls is a oorive~tion x:flthln the 

meantie of tic tmvolin~z eqmma rider quoted, aa construed 

by us obovu. You ,gva in detail .tha mrk x~ich tha ozqlo7oe 

of the State r;,exwtoent of Zuaatio3 is asniped to p-~rfom 

at such oscmbly, but your attention in directed to i%o 

fact that, 80 far ~8 the rider quoted above is ooncerned, 

tha aaployea~a ri@t to rekWu?mmeat for traveling expnsea 

depmda, not upon tho charactor of the work garlcrmd by 

him, but upon t2c nature of the meting &ich he attmds. 

From v&it vie have atr.ted abow, tn thlo o@nion, ym will 

doubtlccs by able to dCtCX?',?0 for yc%rScif Yihcthcr th3 

aoso;lbly of c~c~~oolfflcicls to which you rofor ia a nconvcntion,~~ 

CpotQd. 

t;itkiii, t&o motminz of tha tmvollnt: exy~onoe rider 

R, W. Fairotild 

Aaai8tant
#### § 50.50 Issuance of licenses and construction permits.

Upon determination that an application for a license meets the standards and requirements of the act and regulations, and that notifications, if any, to other agencies or bodies have been duly made, the Commission will issue a license, or if appropriate a construction permit, in such form and containing such conditions and limitations including technical specifications, as it deems appropriate and necessary.
§ 440.20 Low-cost/no-cost weatherization activities. ( a ) An eligible dwelling unit may be weatherized without regard to the limitations contained in § 440.18 (e)(2) or § 440.21(b) from funds designated by the grantee for carrying out low-cost/no-cost weatherization activities provided: ( 1 ) Inexpensive weatherization materials are used, such as water flow controllers, furnace or cooling filters, or items which are primarily directed toward reducing infiltration, including weatherstripping, caulking, glass patching, and insulation for plugging and
( 2 ) No labor paid with funds provided under this part is used to install weatherization materials referred to in paragraph (a)(1) of this section.
( b ) A maximum of 10 percent of the amount allocated to a subgrantee, not to exceed $50 in materials costs per dwelling unit, may be expended to carry out low-cost/no-cost weatherization activities, unless the Support Office Director approves a higher expenditure per dwelling unit.
[49 FR 3629, Jan. 27, 1984, as amended at 50 FR 713, Jan. 4, 1985; 58 FR 12529, Mar. 4, 1993]
PGI 225.872-5 Contract administration.       (b)(i) When contract administration services are required on contracts to be performed in qualifying countries, direct the request to the cognizant activity listed in the Federal Directory of Contract Administration Services. The cognizant activity also will arrange contract administration services for DoD subcontracts that qualifying country sources place in the United States.          (ii) The contract administration activity receiving a delegation shall determine whether any portions of the delegation are covered by memoranda of understanding annexes and, if so, shall delegate those functions to the appropriate organization in the qualifying country's government.    **Parent topic:** PGI 225.872 Contracting with qualifying country sources.
Exhibit 32.1





Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350



Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Alpha Spacecom, Inc. (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 of the Company fully complies, in all material respects, with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





August 19, 2004

/s/ Terence Sien

Name: Terence Sien

Title: Chief Financial Officer