alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1


                  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
                   ACTING CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and accompanies the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB
(the "FORM 10-QSB") for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 of Universal Detection
Technology (the "ISSUER").

      I, Jacques Tizabi, the Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial
Officer of Issuer certify that, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the besT of my
knowledge:

      (i)   the Form 10-QSB fully complies with the requirements of Section
            13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (ii)  the information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Issuer.

Date:  May 19, 2006


/s/Jacques Tizabi
-----------------------------------------
By:    Jacques Tizabi
Title: Chief Executive Officer and Acting
       Chief Financial Officer
2129.401-70 FEGLI Program contract clauses.       The fixed-price contract clauses in FAR subpart 29.4 are inappropriate for the FEGLI Program because of the limited cost-redetermination of FEGLI Program contracts. The clauses at FAR 52.229-1, 52.229-2, 52.229-3, and 52.229-4 shall not be inserted into FEGLI Program contracts.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 2129.4 - Contract Clauses
###### Editorial Note on Part 2

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

#### § 2.1103 Scope of subpart K.

The provisions of this subpart, together with subpart C and applicable provisions of subparts G and L of this part, govern all adjudicatory proceedings on applications filed after January 7, 1983, for a license or license amendment under part 50 of this chapter, to expand the spent fuel storage capacity at the site of a civilian nuclear power plant, through the use of high density fuel storage racks, fuel rod compaction, the transshipment of spent nuclear fuel to another civilian nuclear power reactor within the same utility system, the construction of additional spent nuclear fuel pool capacity or dry storage capacity, or by other means. This subpart also applies to proceedings on applications for a license under part 72 of this chapter to store spent nuclear fuel in an independent spent fuel storage installation located at the site of a civilian nuclear power reactor. This subpart shall not apply to the first application for a license or license amendment to expand the spent fuel storage capacity at a particular site through the use of a new technology not previously approved by the Commission for use at any other nuclear power plant. This subpart shall not apply to proceedings on applications for transfer of a license issued under part 72 of this chapter. Subpart M of this part applies to license transfer proceedings.

[69 FR 2266, Jan. 14, 2004]
§ 1705.08 Appeals from correction denials. ( a ) When amendment of records has been denied by the Privacy Act Officer, the requester may file an appeal in writing. This appeal should be directed to The Chairman, Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board, 625 Indiana Avenue, NW., Suite 700, Washington, DC 20004. The appeal letter must ( 1 ) specify the records subject to the appeal, and
( 2 ) state why the denial of amendment by the Privacy Act Officer is erroneous. The Chairman or his designee will respond to such appeals within thirty working days (subject to extension by the Chairman for good cause) after the appeal letter has been received in the Board's offices.
( b ) The appeal determination, if adverse to the requester in any respect, will: ( 1 ) Explain the basis for denying amendment of the specified records,
( 2 ) inform the requester that he or she may file a concise statement setting forth reasons for disagreeing with the Chairman's determination, and
( 3 ) inform the requester of his or her right to pursue a judicial remedy under 5 U.S.C. 552a(g)(1)(A).
# Subpart 2846.6 - Material Inspection and Receiving Reports

**Parent topic:**PART 2846 - QUALITY ASSURANCE

## 2846.601 General.

Bureaus shall prescribe procedures and instructions for the use, preparation, and distribution of material inspection and receiving reports and commercial shipping document/packing lists to evidence Government inspection (FAR 46.401) and acceptance (FAR 46.501).
#### Maureen A. Mugan, Respondent, v James E. Mugan, Appellant.

Judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered June 26, 1979, affirmed, without costs or disbursements (see *Joachim v*Joachim, 57 AD2d 546). Hopkins, J. P., Damiani, O’Connor and Weinstein, JJ., concur.
###### Editorial Note on Part 2

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

#### § 2.1200 Scope of subpart L.

###### Cross Reference

Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 67834, Aug. 22, 2024.

The provisions of this subpart, together with subpart C of this part, govern all adjudicatory proceedings conducted under the authority of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, the Energy Reorganization Act, and 10 CFR part 2, except for proceedings on the licensing of the construction and operation of a uranium enrichment facility, proceedings on an initial application for construction authorization for a high-level radioactive waste geologic repository at a geologic repository operations area noticed under §§ 2.101(e)(8) or 2.105(a)(5), proceedings on an initial application for a license to receive and possess high-level radioactive waste at a geologic repository operations area, proceedings on enforcement matters unless all parties otherwise agree and request the application of Subpart L procedures, and proceedings for the direct or indirect transfer of control of an NRC license when the transfer requires prior approval of the NRC under the Commission's regulations, governing statutes, or pursuant to a license condition.

[69 FR 2267, Jan. 14, 2004, as amended at 82 FR 52825, Nov. 15, 2017]
59–008 

109TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 2d Session 109–725 

WAIVING A REQUIREMENT OF CLAUSE 6(a) OF RULE XIII WITH RESPECT 

TO CONSIDERATION OF CERTAIN RESOLUTIONS REPORTED FROM THE 

COMMITTEE ON RULES AND PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF MOTIONS TO SUSPEND THE RULES 

DECEMBER 7, 2006.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

Mrs. CAPITO, from the Committee on Rules, 

submitted the following 

R E P O R T 

[To accompany H. Res. 1102] 

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House 

Resolution 1102, by a nonrecord vote, reports the same to the 

House with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted. 

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution waives clause 6(a) of rule XIII (requiring a twothirds vote to consider a rule on the same day it is reported from 

the Rules Committee) against certain resolutions reported from the 

Rules Committee. The resolution applies the waiver to any special 

rule reported on the legislative day of December 8, 2006. 

The rule further provides that suspensions will be in order at 

any time on the legislative day of December 8, 2006. The rule provides that the Speaker or his designee shall consult with the Minority Leader or her designee on any suspension considered under 

the rule. 

Æ 


ccoleman on PROD1PC71 with MISCELLANEOUS
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1084 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 1084

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                      December 6, 2006.
Whereas Edward R. Bradley was born on June 22, 1941, in Philadelphia 
        Pennsylvania;
Whereas he graduated in 1964 with a degree in education from Cheyney State 
        College;
Whereas he taught during the day at William B. Mann Elementary in Philadelphia 
        and spent his evenings working at local radio station WDAS for free;
Whereas in 1965, when riots broke out in Philadelphia, Ed Bradley, lacking 
        recording equipment, covered the riots from a neighborhood pay phone;
Whereas Ed Bradley's coverage of the Philadelphia riots earned him a full time 
        paid position with WDAS;
Whereas Ed Bradley was hired in 1967 as a reporter for WCBS radio in New York;
Whereas in 1968 he was the only African American on air at WCBS, or at any New 
        York City radio station;
Whereas he joined CBS News in 1971 as a stringer in its Paris bureau, covering 
        the Paris Peace talks, and remained with CBS News for 35 years;
Whereas he was transferred in 1972 to CBS Saigon bureau to cover the Vietnam War 
        and while covering the War in Cambodia was injured by a mortar round;
Whereas he covered Jimmy Carter's campaign in 1976 and served as a CBS news 
        floor correspondent for coverage of the Democratic and Republican 
        National Conventions;
Whereas he became the first African American White House correspondent for CBS 
        news from 1976 to 1978;
Whereas in 1981 Ed Bradley joined 60 Minutes as an on-air correspondent and 
        remained with 60 Minutes for 26 years;
Whereas in 2000, Ed Bradley was the only television journalist granted an 
        interview with condemned Oklahoma City Bomber, Timothy McVeigh, which 
        earned him an Emmy award;
Whereas Ed Bradley received numerous awards of distinction for his in-depth 
        reporting and coverage, including 20 Emmy awards, Lew Klein Excellence 
        in the Media Award (2006), Paul White Award (2000), Damon Runyon Award 
        (2003), Robert F. Kennedy Journalism Award (1995), and a Lifetime 
        Achievement Award from the National Association of Black Journalists 
        (2005); and
Whereas in addition to invaluable contributions to journalism, Ed Bradley's 
        reporting also spurred social activism and change with his report on 
        AIDS in Africa, ``Death by Denial'', which helped influence the 
        pharmaceutical industry into discounting and donating AIDS drugs to 
        Africa: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) recognizes and honors the contributions of Edward R. Bradley as 
        an award winning American journalist; and
            (2) expresses its deepest condolences upon his death to his wife, 
        Patricia Blanchet, surviving family members, and friends.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6426

NIYGEL ST. JOHN TINSLEY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

MICHAEL MOORE, Commissioner, South Carolina

Department of Corrections; COLIE L. RUSHTON,

Warden, McCormick Correctional Institution,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Florence. William B. Traxler, Jr., District

Judge. (CA-95-2931-4-21BE)

Submitted: June 19, 1997 Decided: June 30, 1997

Before WILKINS and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Niygel St. John Tinsley, Appellant Pro Se. William Ansel Collins,

Jr., SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Columbia, South

Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on

his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record

and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.

Tinsley v. Moore, No. CA-95-2931-4-21BE (D.S.C. Mar. 3, 1997). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
1952.227-78 Disposition of prints and

videotape recordings.

As prescribed in 1927.405(j) insert the following clause in License Agreements:

Disposition of Prints and Videotape Recordings (FEB 1985)

If the Board elects to discontinue distribution and exhibition hereunder, or upon expiration of the

term of this License Agreement, the Board will destroy all prints and erase all videotape recordings

of the Film. A certificate(s) attesting to such destruction and/or erasure will be furnished the

Licensor upon its written request.

(End of clause)

Parent topic: Subpart 1952.2 - Texts of Provisions and Clauses
#### § 959.237 Assessment rate.

###### Cross Reference

Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 67522, Aug. 21, 2024.

On and after August 1, 2019, an assessment rate of $0.05 per 50-pound equivalent is established for South Texas onions.

[85 FR 39049, June 30, 2020]
#### § 75.7 Inspection in accordance with methods prescribed or approved.

Inspection of seed shall be rendered pursuant to these regulations and under such conditions and in accordance with the methods of either the Association of Official Seed Analysts (AOSA) or the International Seed Testing Association (ISTA).
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Ex parte Jeremiah Dunnigan., * Original Habeas Corpus Proceeding

No. 11-22-00132-CR * May 26, 2022

* Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

(Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,

Trotter, J., and Williams, J.)

This court has considered Jeremiah Dunnigan’s application for writ of habeas 

corpus and concludes that the application for writ of habeas corpus should be 

dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s 

opinion, the application for habeas corpus is dismissed.
#### § 170.20 Average cost per professional staff-hour.

Fees for permits, licenses, amendments, renewals, special projects, 10 CFR part 55 re-qualification and replacement examinations and tests, other required reviews, approvals, and inspections under §§ 170.21 and 170.31 will be calculated using the professional staff-hour rate of $317 per hour.

[83 FR 29645, June 25, 2018, as amended at 85 FR 37270, June 19, 2020; 86 FR 32170, June 16, 2021; 87 FR 37214, June 22, 2022; 88 FR 39140, June 15, 2023; 89 FR 51811, June 20, 2024]
1417.605 Award, renewal and extension.

The CO shall review each management and operating contract prior to any extension or exercise of a

renewal option. Any extension or renewal of a management and operating contract shall first be

authorized as required in 1417.602.

Parent topic: Subpart 1417.6 - Management and Operating Contracts
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

**____________** No. 23 - 10765 Summary Calendar

**____________ United States of America,**  Plaintiff
— Appellee **,** versus **Leida Jimena Hernandez -**  **Munoz,** Defendant
— Appellant **.**

**______________________________** Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:21 - CR - 446 - 2

**________ ______________________**  Before **Smith, Higginson,** and **Engelhardt,** Circuit Judges **. Per Curiam**  **:** ***** The attorney appointed to represent Leida Jimena Hernandez - Munoz has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Hernandez - Munoz has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief a nd the relevant portions of the record reflected

**_____________________** * This opinion is not designated for publication. See **5th Cir .**  **R .**  47.5. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED February 26, 2024 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 23-10765 Document: 59 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/26/2024No. 23 - 10765

2 therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is **GRANTED** , counsel is excused from fur ther responsibilities herein, and the appeal is **DISMISSED** . See **5th Cir. R.**  42.2 . Case: 23-10765 Document: 59 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/26/2024
605.502 Authority.

(a) For paid advertisements in newspapers within the United States, the head of the contracting

activity is the agency head's designee for the purposes of FAR 5.502(a). For acquisitions by overseas

posts necessitating paid advertisements in newspapers outside the United States, the head of the

contracting activity is the agency's head's designee for the purposes of FAR 5.502(a). When the head

of the contracting activity is the contracting officer for the acquisition, no further approvals are

necessary.

Parent topic: Subpart 605.5—Paid Advertisements
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 300 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 300

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                      October 18, 2005.
Whereas the South Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company was organized on 
        December 19, 1955, to provide members of the Farm Bureau Federation with 
        insurance coverage that was difficult to obtain and to assist such 
        members with safety programs and loss control measures;
Whereas the South Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company is the largest 
        domestic property and casualty insurer in the State of South Carolina;
Whereas the South Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company has 245 
        employees and 250 exclusive licensed agents throughout South Carolina 
        that offer various insurance and financial services;
Whereas the South Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company provides a 
        diverse line of products, including auto, homeowners, and other 
        insurance coverage with sales exceeding $190,000,000 on more than 
        344,000 policies;
Whereas in 1999, after Hurricane Floyd struck the coast of South Carolina, 90 
        percent of reported claims made with the South Carolina Farm Bureau 
        Mutual Insurance Company were settled within one week; and
Whereas the South Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company serves families 
        of farmers and non-farmers in rural and urban communities and the slogan 
        of the Company is, ``Helping you is what we do best'': Now, therefore, 
        be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives recognizes the South Carolina 
Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company on the occasion of its 50th anniversary and 
salutes the outstanding service of the Company to the people of South Carolina.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

 )

 v. ) CR. NO. 1:06-mj-70-DRB

 )

OSCAR MARTINEZ-RAMIREZ )

O R D E R

Upon consideration of the Petition for Writ of Habeas CorpusAd Prosequendum, construed

as a motion (Doc. 4, filed July 28, 2006), and for good cause shown, the Court is of the opinion that

said motion should be and the same is hereby granted. It is, therefore, ORDERED that the Clerk of

this Court be and is hereby DIRECTED to issue a WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS AD

PROSEQUENDUM addressed to Wakulla County Jail, Crawfordville, Florida, commanding them

to deliver the said Oscar Martinez-Ramirez to any United States Marshal or Deputy United States

Marshal and directing said Marshal or Deputy to bring said prisoner before this Court to be held at

Montgomery, Alabama, on August 30, 2006, at 10:00 a.m. and to return said prisoner to said official

when the Court shall have finished with him.

DONE this the 28 day of July, 2006. th

/s/ Delores R. Boyd

DELORES R. BOYD

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:06-cr-00201-WHA-CSC Document 5 Filed 07/28/2006 Page 1 of 1
§ 110.121 Security clearances and access to classified information. ( a ) No person without a security clearance will have access to classified information.
( b ) Only the Commission will act upon an application for access to classified information.
( c ) To the extent practicable, applications for access to classified information shall describe the information to which access is desired and its level of classification (confidential, secret or other); the reasons for requesting access; the names of individuals for whom access is requested; and the reasons why access is requested for those individuals.
( d ) The Commission will consider requests for appropriate security clearances in reasonable numbers; conduct its review and grant or deny these in accordance with part 10 of this chapter; and make a reasonable charge to cover costs.
( e ) The Commission will not grant security clearances for access to classified information, unless it determines that the available unclassified information is inadequate on the subject matter involved.
( f ) When an application demonstrates that access to classified information not introduced into a hearing may be needed to prepare a participant's position on the hearing issues, the Commission may issue an order granting access to this information to the participant, his authorized representative or other persons. Access will be subject to the conditions in paragraphs (e) and (j) and will not be granted unless required security clearances have been obtained.
( g ) Once classified information has been introduced into a hearing, the Commission will grant access to a participant, his authorized representative or such other persons as the Commission determines may be needed by the participant to prepare his position on the hearing issues. Access will be subject to the conditions in paragraphs (e) and (j) of this section and will not be granted unless required security clearances have been obtained.
( h ) For good cause, the Commission may postpone action upon an application for access to classified information.
( i ) The Commission will grant access to classified information only up to the level for which the persons described in paragraphs (f) and (g) of this section are cleared and only upon an adequate commitment by them not to disclose such information subject to penalties as provided by law.
( j ) The Commission will not in any circumstances grant access to classified information: ( 1 ) Unless it determines that the grant is not inimical to the common defense and security; and
( 2 ) Which it has received from another Government agency, without the prior consent of the originating agency.
( k ) Upon completion of a hearing, the Commission will terminate all security clearances granted pursuant to the hearing and may require the disposal of classified information to which access has been granted or the observance of other procedures to safeguard this information.