Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 239 / Tuesday, December 14, 2010 / Notices 77895 

concerning the proposed collection of 

information to: (1) Evaluate whether the 

proposed collection of information is 

necessary for the proper performance of 

the functions of the agency, including 

whether the information will have 

practical utility; (2) Evaluate the 

accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the 

burden of the proposed collection of 

information; (3) Enhance the quality, 

utility, and clarity of the information to 

be collected; and (4) Minimize the 

burden of the collection of information 

on those who are to respond; including 

through the use of appropriate 

automated collection techniques or 

other forms of information technology, 

e.g., permitting electronic submission of 

responses. 

This notice also lists the following 

information: 

Title of Proposal: Recertification of 

Family Income and Composition. 

OMB Approval Number: 2502–0082. 

Form Numbers: HUD–93101A, HUD 

93101. 

Description of the Need For the 

Information and its Proposed Use: 

Recertification information is 

submitted by homeowners to 

mortgagees to determine their continued 

eligibility for assistance and to 

determine the amount of assistance a 

homeowner is to receive. The 

information collected is also used by 

mortgagees to report statistical and 

general program data to HUD. 

Frequency of Submission: On 

occasion, Annually. 

Number of respondents Annual responses × Hours per responses = Burden hours 

Reporting Burden .............................................................................. 3,500 0.909 1.1 3,500 

Total Estimated Burden Hours: 

3,500,800. 

Status: Extension without change of a 

currently approved collection. 

Authority: Section 3507 of the Paperwork 

Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. 35, as 

amended. 

Dated: December 8, 2010. 

Colette Pollard, 

Departmental Reports Management Officer, 

Office of the Chief Information Officer. 

[FR Doc. 2010–31364 Filed 12–13–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4210–67–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND 

URBAN DEVELOPMENT 

[Docket No. FR–5376–N–117] 

Notice of Submission of Proposed 

Information Collection to OMB; HUD 

Multifamily Energy Assessment 

AGENCY: Office of the Chief Information 

Officer, HUD. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The proposed information 

collection requirement described below 

has been submitted to the Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) for 

review, as required by the Paperwork 

Reduction Act. The Department is 

soliciting public comments on the 

subject proposal. 

This information is used to ensure 

that owners assess energy needs in an 

effort to reduce project operating costs 

and utility expenses through costeffective energy conservation and 

efficiency measures. HUD used the 

information in monitoring the 

Department’s energy strategy and for 

inclusion in the Department’s biannual 

reporting requirements to Congress as 

required by Section 154 of the Energy 

Policy Act of 2005. 

DATES: Comments Due Date: January 13, 

2011. 

ADDRESSES: Interested persons are 

invited to submit comments regarding 

this proposal. Comments should refer to 

the proposal by name and/or OMB 

approval Number (2502–0568) and 

should be sent to: HUD Desk Officer, 

Office of Management and Budget, New 

Executive Office Building, Washington, 

DC 20503; fax: 202–395–5806. E-mail: 

OIRA_Submission@omb.eop.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Colette Pollard, Reports Management 

Officer, QDAM, Department of Housing 

and Urban Development, 451 Seventh 

Street, SW., Washington, DC 20410; email Colette Pollard at 

Colette.Pollard@hud.gov or telephone 

(202) 402–3400. This is not a toll-free 

number. Copies of available documents 

submitted to OMB may be obtained 

from Ms. Pollard. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This 

notice informs the public that the 

Department of Housing and Urban 

Development has submitted to OMB a 

request for approval of the Information 

collection described below. This notice 

is soliciting comments from members of 

the public and affecting agencies 

concerning the proposed collection of 

information to: (1) Evaluate whether the 

proposed collection of information is 

necessary for the proper performance of 

the functions of the agency, including 

whether the information will have 

practical utility; (2) Evaluate the 

accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the 

burden of the proposed collection of 

information; (3) Enhance the quality, 

utility, and clarity of the information to 

be collected; and (4) Minimize the 

burden of the collection of information 

on those who are to respond; including 

through the use of appropriate 

automated collection techniques or 

other forms of information technology, 

e.g., permitting electronic submission of 

responses. 

This notice also lists the following 

information: 

Title of Proposal: HUD Multifamily 

Energy Assessment. 

OMB Approval Number: 2502–0568. 

Form Numbers: HUD 9614. 

Description of the Need for the 

Information and its Proposed Use: 

This information is used to ensure 

that owners assess energy needs in an 

effort to reduce project operating costs 

and utility expenses through costeffective energy conservation and 

efficiency measures. HUD used the 

information in monitoring the 

Department’s energy strategy and for 

inclusion in the Department’s biannual 

reporting requirements to Congress as 

required by Section 154 of the Energy 

Policy Act of 2005. 

Frequency of Submission: On 

occasion, Monthly, Annually. 

Number of 

respondents 

Annual 

responses x Hours per response = Burden hours 

Reporting Burden: ............................................................................. 10,296 0.123 8.125 10,296 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES
77896 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 239 / Tuesday, December 14, 2010 / Notices 

Total Estimated Burden Hours: 

10,296. 

Status: Revision of a currently 

approved collection. 

Authority: Section 3507 of the Paperwork 

Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. 35, as 

amended. 

Dated: December 8, 2010. 

Colette Pollard, 

Departmental Reports Management Officer, 

Office of the Chief Information Officer. 

[FR Doc. 2010–31362 Filed 12–13–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4210–67–P 

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 

National Park Service 

[5284–TT02–371] 

Notice of Availability: Tamiami Trail 

Modifications: Next Steps Project, 

Final Environmental Impact Statement, 

Everglades National Park, Florida 

AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior. 

ACTION: Notice of Availability. 

The Notice of Intent (NOI) for this 

project referred to it as a ‘‘Feasibility 

Study and Report’’ based on language in 

the authorizing legislation. This new 

appellation was a result of public 

scoping and internal National Park 

Service discussions. 

SUMMARY: Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 

4332(2)(C) of the National 

Environmental Policy Act of 1969 and 

National Park Service (NPS) policy in 

Director’s Order Number 2 (Park 

Planning) and Director’s Order Number 

12 (Conservation Planning, 

Environmental Impact Analysis, and 

Decision-making), the NPS announces 

the availability of a Final Environmental 

Impact Statement (FEIS) for the 

Tamiami Trail (U.S. Highway 41) 

Modifications: Next Steps Project for 

Everglades National Park, Florida. 

The 2009 Omnibus Appropriations 

Act (Pub. L. 111–008, dated March 11, 

2009) directed the U.S. Army Corps of 

Engineers (USACE) to construct 

modifications to Tamiami Trail (U.S. 

Highway 41) that were approved in the 

2008 Limited Reevaluation Report and 

Environmental Assessment. The 2009 

Omnibus Appropriations Act also 

directed the NPS to ‘‘immediately 

evaluate the feasibility of additional 

bridge length, beyond that to be 

constructed pursuant to the Modified 

Water Deliveries to Everglades National 

Park Project (16 U.S.C. 410r–8), 

including a continuous bridge, or 

additional bridges or some combination 

thereof, for the Tamiami Trail (U.S. 

Highway 41) to restore more natural 

water flow to Everglades National Park 

and Florida Bay and for the purpose of 

restoring habitat within the Park and the 

ecological connectivity between the 

Park and the Water Conservation Areas.’’ 

DATES: The NPS will execute a Record 

of Decision (ROD) no sooner than 30 

days following publication by the 

Environmental Protection Agency of the 

Notice of Availability of the FEIS. 

ADDRESSES: The document will be 

available for public review online at 

http://parkplanning.nps.gov/ever. A 

limited number of compact discs (CDs) 

and hard copies are available at Park 

headquarters. You may request a hard 

copy or CD by contacting Everglades 

National Park, Attn: Bruce Boler, 950 N. 

Krome Avenue, Homestead, FL 33030– 

6733; telephone 305–224–4234. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Public 

scoping was initiated in the summer of 

2009. A newsletter was distributed on 

May 31, 2009, and a public meeting was 

held on June 2, 2009, to keep the public 

informed and involved throughout the 

planning process. As the lead agency, 

the NPS conducted several inter-agency/ 

Tribal meetings and one workshop to 

develop project objectives, identify 

alternatives, evaluate the benefits of 

alternatives, and identify a preferred 

alternative. The draft document was 

revised as a result of public and agency 

feedback received during the public 

comment period. The FEIS provides 

historical information, existing 

conditions, alternatives for 

infrastructure modifications, and related 

impacts of the alternatives. The FEIS 

describes six alternatives for 

consideration, including a no-action 

alternative that provides for the 

continuation of the current Tamiami 

Trail infrastructure configuration. The 

five action alternatives present a range 

of infrastructure modification 

opportunities. The environmental 

impacts of each alternative, including 

the no-action alternative, are 

systematically analyzed in the 

document. 

The six analyzed alternatives (with 

corresponding identifiers as they appear 

in the document) are as follows: 

• No-Action Alternative: The NoAction Alternative consists of a 1-mile 

eastern bridge and elevation of the 

remaining roadway to allow for 8.5 feet 

stages in the L–29 Canal. This 

alternative continues the status quo. 

• Alternative 1: 2.2 miles of bridges 

and remaining roadway elevated: 

Alternative 1 would involve creating 

conveyance openings through Tamiami 

Trail by removing 2.2 miles of the 

existing highway and embankment. 

Four bridges would be constructed in 

the openings to replace the removed 

section of road and maintain vehicle 

traffic across the openings. This 

alternative would create 2.2 miles of 

ecological connectivity and better 

distribute flows in the western area of 

the 11-mile project corridor. 

• Alternative 2a: 3.3 miles of bridges 

and remaining roadway elevated: 

Alternative 2a would involve creating 

conveyance openings through Tamiami 

Trail by removing 3.3 miles of the 

existing highway and embankment. Six 

bridges would be constructed in the 

openings to replace the removed section 

of road and maintain vehicle traffic 

across the openings. This alternative 

would create 3.3 miles of ecological 

connectivity and moderately reduce the 

adverse effects of high velocity 

discharges associated with the existing 

culverts. 

• Alternative 4: 1.0 miles of bridging 

and remaining roadway elevated: 

Alternative 4 would involve creating 

conveyance openings through Tamiami 

Trail by removing 1.0 mile of the 

existing highway and embankment 

where the bridging is proposed. Two 

bridges would be constructed in the 

opening to replace the removed section 

of road and maintain vehicle traffic. 

This alternative would increase 

ecological connectivity by 1.0 mile. 

• Alternative 5: 1.5 miles of bridging 

and remaining roadway elevated: 

Alternative 5 would involve creating 

conveyance openings through Tamiami 

Trail by removing 1.5 miles of the 

existing highway and embankment. 

Three bridges would be constructed in 

the opening to replace the removed 

section of road and maintain vehicle 

traffic. This alternative would increase 

ecological connectivity by 1.5 miles. 

• Alternative 6e: 5.5 miles of bridging 

and remaining roadway elevated. 

Alternative 6e is the maximum bridging 

option and involves creating 

conveyance openings through Tamiami 

Trail by removing 5.5 miles of the 

existing highway and embankment. 

Four bridges would be constructed in 

the opening to replace the removed 

section of road and maintain vehicle 

traffic. Bridge down-ramp (access 

ramps) options were also developed for 

Alternative 6e to maintain access to two 

commercial airboat facilities: Everglades 

Safari Park and Coopertown. Option 4 

(Modified Parallel Down Ramp) was 

selected as the preferred option for 

Everglades Safari and Option 5 (Parallel 

Down Ramp with Existing Frontage 

Road) was selected as the preferred 

option for Coopertown. Alternative 6e 

would increase ecological connectivity 

by 5.5 miles, reduce flow velocities 

below the 0.10 feet per second (fps) 


srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES