alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION



I, Igor Gorodnitsky , Chief Executive Officer
of Cavitation Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



The Annual Report on Amendment No. 3 on
Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended June 30, 2016 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. § 78m); and



The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Date: February 8, 2017 | /s/ IGOR GORODNITSKY                                
|---------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------
|                       | Name: Igor GorodnitskyTitle: Chief Executive Officer



A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# United Sta tes Court of App ea ls F or the Se ve nth

Cir c uit Chicag o, I llinois 60604 August 28, 200 7 Before Hon. KENNET H F. RI PPL E , Circuit Judge Hon. DANI ELA. MANI ON , Circuit Judge Hon. DI ANE P. WOOD , Circuit Judge

Nos. 05-1442 CHRI STOPHER M. S TEVENS, Appea l from the United States District Court for the Norther

nDistrict of Indiana , Petitioner-Appellant, Hammond Division.

v. No . 0 3 C 5 DA NI EL R. M CB RI DE , Su

pe ri nte nd e nt, Allen Sh arp, Judge. Respondent-Appe llee,

O R D E R Respondent-Appe llee filed a petition for re hear ing a

nd rehe aringen banc on J uly 2, 2007, and Petitioner-Appe llant filed a pe tition for rehe aringand re hearing e n banc on July 27, 2007. No j u d ge i nre gu l ar

ac t i v e s erv i ce h as re qu es t eda v o t e o nth e p et i t i o n s fo r r eh ea ri n g en banc , and all members of

the orig inal panel have voted to DEN Y re hear ing. A ccor dingly , I T IS ORDERED t h at t h e p et i t i o n s fo r r eh ea ri n g an d re h ea ri n g en banc are DENI ED. I T I S FURTHER ORDERED that the opinion re lease d on J une 18, 2007, is amende d as fo llo ws :

S e c t i o nIII of the orig inal opinion is wit hdrawn, and is repla ced w ith the following ne w section:Appea l no. 05-1442 Pag e 2 III F or the fo re g oin g re a so ns , th e jud g me nt o f t he dis tr ic t c ourt

is A FF I R M ED to the extent that it denies ha beas c orpus re lief with respe ct to Stevens’s convic tion, and it is ot herw ise V A C A TED . Th e c a se is REM A N D ED wi th i ns tr uc tio ns to i ssu e a

wr it o f h a

be a s corpus that va cate s the curr ent sentenc e of c apital punishment. The State of I

ndiana is fr ee to c onduct a ne w death penalty hear ing, providing that it files appropriate documents see king suc h relief within 120 day s of the mandate from this court.
Case 2:06-cv-00746-WHA Document 8 Filed 09/29/2006 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:06-cv-00746-WHA Document 8 Filed 09/29/2006 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:06-cv-00746-WHA Document 8 Filed 09/29/2006 Page 3 of 3
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The following schedule contains summarized financial information
extracted from the Questar Pipeline Company Consolidated Income
Statement and Balance Sheet for the period ended September 30, 1999,
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such unaudited
financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   24,860
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      2,916
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                29,526
<PP&E>                                         692,616
<DEPRECIATION>                                 228,207
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 560,559
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           89,592
<BONDS>                                        202,996
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         6,551
<OTHER-SE>                                     192,988
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   560,559
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                82,546
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   27,159
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                14,987
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              12,602
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 29,096
<INCOME-TAX>                                    10,634
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             18,462
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    18,462
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

vs. ) CR. NO. 1:06CR201-WHA

)

OSCAR MARTINEZ-RAMIREZ )

ORDER

Pursuant to the defendant’s Notice of Intent to Change Plea (Doc. #28) filed on

December 19, 2006, it is hereby

ORDERED that the defendant’s change of plea hearing be and is hereby set for 

December 27, 2006, at 9:30 p.m., in courtroom 4B, United States Courthouse Complex,

One Church Street, Montgomery, Alabama. 

The Clerk is directed to provide an interpreter and a court reporter for this

proceeding. If the defendant is in custody, the United States Marshal or the person having

custody of the defendant shall produce the defendant for the proceeding.

Done this 19 day of December, 2006. th

 /s/Charles S. Coody 

CHARLES S. COODY

CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:06-cr-00201-WHA-CSC Document 29 Filed 12/19/2006 Page 1 of 1
§ 1705.09 Disclosure of records to third parties. Records subject to the Privacy Act that are requested by any person other than the individual to whom they pertain will not be made available except in the following circumstances: ( a ) Their release is required under the Freedom of Information Act in accordance with the Board's FOIA regulations, 10 CFR part 1703;
( b ) Prior consent for disclosure is obtained in writing from the individual to whom the records pertain; or
( c ) Release is authorized by 5 U.S.C. 552a(b) (1) or (3) through (11).
873.101 Policy.

(a) General. In accordance with 38 U.S.C. 8153, to secure health-care resources which otherwise

might not be feasibly available, or to effectively utilize certain other health-care resources, the

Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) may make arrangements by contract for the mutual use, or

exchange of use, of health-care resources between VA health-care facilities and any health-care

provider, or other entity or individual. This part prescribes simplified procedures for contracts with

entities not affiliated with VA under 38 U.S.C. 7302 to secure health-care resources that are a

commercial service, or the use of medical equipment or space. VA may enter into such a contract if

such resources are not, or would not be, used to their maximum effective capacity. (38 U.S.C. 8153)

(b) Precedence. The procedures in this part shall be used in conjunction with the Federal Acquisition

Regulation (FAR) and other parts of the VA Acquisition Regulation (VAAR). However, when a policy

or procedure in the FAR or another part of the VAAR is inconsistent with the procedures contained

in this part, this part shall take precedence. (38 U.S.C. 8153)

Parent topic: PART 873 - SIMPLIFIED PROCEDURES FOR HEALTH-CARE RESOURCES
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, SOUTHERN DIVISION

CHRISTINE BENNETT, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

v. ) 1:06cv723-MHT

) 

ARMY FLEET SUPPORT LLC, )

)

Defendant. )

ORDER

It is ORDERED that the motion to file amended answer

(doc. no. 23) is granted. The court assumes that the

opposing party has no objections to the allowance of the

amendment; however, if she does, she must file the

objection within seven days from the date of this order.

DONE, this the 6th day of February, 2006.

 /s/ Myron H. Thompson 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00723-MHT-CSC Document 24 Filed 02/06/2007 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 35.5

 

 

1123 Servicer Compliance Statement

Transactions Listed With SEC

I, Michael C. Koster, Executive Vice President of TIAA, FSB, certify that: 

|   | (a) | A review of TIAA, FSB (the “Servicer”) activities during the period ending December 31, 2019, (“Reporting Period”) and of its performance under the applicable servicing agreement as identified on Schedule A has been made under my supervision. |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (b) | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the applicable servicing agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

February 27, 2020 

 

| By:    |   | /s/ Michael C. Koster    |
|--------|--------|--------------------------|
| Name:  |   | Michael C. Koster        |
| Title: |   | Executive Vice President |

 

----

Schedule A

Transactions Listed with the SEC 2019

Deals in full compliance

 

| Security or Deal  | Full Deal Name                  | Master Servicer of Trustee or Investor                                                                                                                                                 |
|-------------------|---------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| SEMT 2019-1       | Sequoia Mortgage Trust 2019-1   | Master Servicer - Nationstar Mortgage LLC

Trustee - Wilminton Trust, National Association Securities Administrator - Citibank, N.A.

Depositor - Secquoia Residential Funding, Inc.   |
| SEMT 2019-CH1     | Sequoia Mortgage Trust 2019-CH1 | Master Servicer - Nationstar Mortgage LLC 

Trustee - Wilminton Trust, National Association

Securities Administrator - Citibank, N.A.

Depositor - Secquoia Residential Funding, Inc. |
| SEMT Trust 2013-1 | Sequoia Mortgage Trust 2013-1   | Master Servicer - Wells Fargo Bank

Trustee - Christina Trust

Securities Administrator – Citibank

Depositor - Redwood Residential Acquisition Corp.                            |
#### In the Matter of Alyce G. Galagaran et al., Appellants, v Everett F. McNab et al., Constituting the Board of Elections of the County of Suffolk, Respondents, and William K. Franklin et al., Respondents. In the Matter of Thomas E. Nash et al., Appellants, v Everett F. McNab et al., Constituting the Board of Elections of the County of Suffolk, Respondents, and Anne Fitzsimmons et al., Respondents. In the Matter of Thomas E. Nash et al., Appellants, v Everett F. McNab et al., Constituting the Board of Elections of the County of Suffolk, Respondents, and Donald Mendoza et al., Respondents.

In three proceedings to invalidate petitions designating respondents-respondents as candidates in the Conservative Party primary election to be held on September 9, 1980 for the party positions of members of the county committee, the appeals are from three judgments (one in each *528proceeding) of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, all dated August 29, 1980, which dismiss the respective proceedings. Judgments affirmed, without costs or disbursements. No opinion. Hopkins, J. P., Lazer, Rabin and Hargett, JJ., concur.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 21, 2014

No. 04-14-00533-CV

Kenneth W. ARTHUR, et al,

Appellant

v.

UVALDE COUNTY APPRAISAL DISTRICT, Albert Mireles, Chief Appraiser,

Appellee

From the 38th Judicial District Court, Uvalde County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012-04-28619-TX

Honorable Watt Murrah, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The court reporter’s notification of late record is NOTED. The reporter’s record is due 

on December 8, 2014. No further extensions.

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 21st day of November, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
PGI 225.7018-3 Exceptions.       (c)(1) Commercially available off-the-shelf samarium-cobalt magnets are still subject to the restrictions of 10 U.S.C. 4863 unless incorporated into commercially available off-the-shelf end items or subsystems (see (b)(2)(i)(C)).          (2) A samarium-cobalt magnet that is exempt from 10 U.S.C. 4872 because it is incorporated in an electronic device is still subject to the restrictions of 10 U.S.C. 4863, because the exemption under that statute applies to “electronic component,” which excludes any high performance magnet used in the electronic component (see definition of “electronic component” at 225.7003-1).    **Parent topic:** PGI 225.7018 Restriction on acquisition of certain magnets, tantalum, and tungsten.
```

[109th Congress Public Law 328]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ328.109]

[[Page 120 STAT. 1768]]

Public Law 109-328
109th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
  110 North Chestnut Street in Olathe, Kansas, as the ``Governor John 
  Anderson, Jr. Post Office Building''. <<NOTE: Oct. 12, 2006 -  [H.R. 
                                4674]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The facility of the United States Postal Service located at 110 
North Chestnut Street in Olathe, Kansas, shall be known and designated 
as the ``Governor John Anderson, Jr. Post Office Building''.
SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the facility referred to in section 1 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Governor John Anderson, Jr. 
Post Office Building''.

    Approved October 12, 2006.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 4674:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 152 (2006):
            May 2, considered and passed House.
            Sept. 29, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
###### Editorial Note on Part 2

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

#### § 2.647 [Reserved]
OFFICE OF THE AlTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUfflN. Rorronbl. T. X. Trhblo, Puga P 7be true 8plrlt or d,rti0n lrwa is to extend tbo 

### rlgbt or 

### muwrap to 

### all iwra0a8 nor~lly l

ntltbd

to Umt right rnd not diqIn tl*w of the rore(joiry you lm nmpo0trully l 

### drlud that the 8tatur or a per8on othem iu l 

## qwirm voter In a oahool dlatrlot Zmnot 

## erreats by 

## the iart 

## that his ohlld 

### is 

### truderrad to mother *oh001 

### Gistriot. vary truly yonn
2 JUNE 2015

Twelfth Court of Appeals

1517 West Front Street

Suite 354

Tyler, TX 75702

Re: Cantrell Sash v. State

12-14-00058-CR

Ms. Lusk:

Attached, please find a copy of the letter sent to my client regarding the opinion issued by the 

Court and the right to file a PDR.

If there is anything else I need to do, please let me know. 

Sincerely,

/s/ Austin Reeve Jackson

ACCEPTED

12-14-00058-CR

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS

TYLER, TEXAS

6/2/2015 11:10:27 AM

CATHY LUSK

CLERK

 FILED IN 12th COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 6/2/2015 11:10:27 AM CATHY S. LUSK Clerk

21 MAY 2015

Cantrell Sash

Inmate: 01916323

Estelle Unit

264 FM 3478

Huntsville, TX 77320-3320

Re: Opinion 

Mr. Sash:

Please find enclosed a copy of opinion issued by the Twelfth Court of Appeals in your case. 

Should you desire to do so, you do have the right to file a pro se Petition for Discretionary 

Review in the Court of Criminal Appeals. If you decide to pursue that option you must file your 

petition prior to the expiration of thirty days from the date of the court’s opinion; that is, by June 

12, 2015.

I would be happy to address any questions or concerns you have if you will simply let me know. 

Sincerely,

Austin Reeve Jackson
§ 990.24 Responsibility of a USDA licensee prior to harvest. USDA licensees must: ( a ) No more than 30 days prior to the anticipated harvest of cannabis plants, have a sampling agent collect samples from the cannabis plant for total delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol concentration level testing.
( b ) Have samples collected from the flowering tops of the plant by cutting the top five to eight inches from the “main stem” (that includes the leaves and flowers), “terminal bud” (that occurs at the end of a stem), ”or “central cola” (cut stem that could develop into a bud) of the flowering top of the plant. Sampling guidelines and training requirements for sampling agents are available from USDA. The method used for sampling must be sufficient at a confidence level of 95 percent that no more than one percent (1%) of the plants in the lot would exceed the acceptable hemp THC level. The method used for sampling must ensure that a representative sample is collected that represents a homogeneous composition of the lot.
( c ) Have an authorized representative of the USDA licensee present at the growing site during a scheduled sample collection, if possible.
( d ) Ensure that sampling agents are provided with complete and unrestricted access during business hours to all hemp and other cannabis plants, (whether growing or harvested), all hemp production and storage areas, all land, buildings, and other structures used for the cultivation, handling, and storage of all hemp and other cannabis plants, and all locations listed in the producer license.
( e ) Not harvest the cannabis crop prior to samples being taken.
( f ) Use post-harvest samples only for remediated biomass.
Editorial Note on Part 26
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 26 appear at 87 FR 71455, Nov. 22, 2022.

§ 26.101 Conducting a confirmatory test for alcohol. ( a ) The confirmatory test must begin as soon as possible, but no more than 30 minutes after the conclusion of the initial test.
( b ) To complete the confirmatory test, the collector shall— ( 1 ) In the presence of the donor, conduct an air blank on the EBT before beginning the confirmatory test and show the result to the donor;
( 2 ) Verify that the reading is 0.00. If the reading is 0.00, the test may proceed. If not, then conduct another air blank;
( 3 ) If the reading on the second air blank is 0.00, the test may proceed. If the reading is greater than 0.00, take the EBT out of service and proceed with the test using another EBT. If an EBT is taken out of service for this reason, the EBT may not be used for further testing until it is found to be within tolerance limits on an external check of calibration;
( 4 ) Open an individually wrapped or sealed mouthpiece in view of the donor and insert it into the device as required by the manufacturer's instructions;
( 5 ) Read the unique test number displayed on the EBT, and ensure that the donor reads the same number;
( 6 ) Instruct the donor to blow steadily and forcefully into the mouthpiece for at least 6 seconds or until the device indicates that an adequate amount of breath has been obtained; and
( 7 ) Show the donor the result displayed on or printed by the EBT, record the result, and document the time at which the confirmatory test result was known.
( c ) Unless there are problems in administering the breath test that require an additional collection, the collector shall collect only one breath specimen for the confirmatory test. If an additional collection(s) is required because of problems in administering the breath test, the collector shall rely on the breath specimen from the first successful collection to determine the confirmatory test result. Collection procedures may not require collectors to calculate an average or otherwise combine results from two or more breath specimens to determine the confirmatory test result.
( d ) If an EBT that meets the requirements of § 26.91(b) and (c) was used for the initial alcohol test, the same EBT may be used for confirmatory testing.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 243 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 243

    Recognizing the Coast Guard, the Coast Guard Auxiliary, and the 
  National Safe Boating Council for their efforts to promote National 
                           Safe Boating Week.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 2005

   Mr. Cooper (for himself, Mr. Taylor of Mississippi, and Mr. Shaw) 
submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee 
                  on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
    Recognizing the Coast Guard, the Coast Guard Auxiliary, and the 
  National Safe Boating Council for their efforts to promote National 
                           Safe Boating Week.

Whereas recreational boating is one of our Nation's most popular pastimes, with 
        an estimated 78,000,000 recreational boaters in the United States and 
        nearly 13,000,000 recreational vessels registered;
Whereas the number of recreational boating fatalities has declined by more than 
        half since 1970, thanks to the increased use of life jackets, 
        cooperative boating safety education, enforcement efforts between the 
        Coast Guard and State governments, and safer vessels and equipment 
        manufactured in accordance with Coast Guard standards;
Whereas recreational boating accidents have nevertheless claimed the lives of 
        703 Americans in 2003, more than half of whose lives could have been 
        saved with the proper use of a personal flotation device;
Whereas a continued emphasis on accident prevention can reduce recreational 
        boating fatalities still further, and in particular deaths by drowning, 
        which remain the leading cause of recreational boating fatalities; and
Whereas the National Safe Boating Council, with the support of the Coast Guard 
        and the Coast Guard Auxiliary, has proposed designating the week of May 
        21 through 27, 2005, as National Safe Boating Week: Now, therefore, be 
        it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) supports initiatives for recreational boating safety 
        education and accident prevention to minimize the number of 
        annual recreational boating fatalities;
            (2) recognizes the Coast Guard, the Coast Guard Auxiliary, 
        and the National Safe Boating Council for their efforts each 
        year during May to highlight the importance of safe 
        recreational boating; and
            (3) supports the goals of National Safe Boating Week.
                                 <all>
```