alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### MEMORANDUM OPINION
N os. 04

- 10

- 00589

- CV & 04

- 10

- 00590

- CV THE STATE OF TEXAS FOR THE BEST INTEREST AND PROTECTION OF K.K.S. , as a Mentally Ill Person From the Probate Court No 1 , Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court Nos. 2010MH1581 & 2010MH 1672 Honorable Polly Jackson Spencer , Judge Presiding Opinion by: Rebecca Simmons, Justice Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice Rebecca S immons , Justice Delivered and Filed: December 29, 2010 AFFIRMED These accelerated appeals challenge a trial court’s judgment involuntarily committing K.K.S. for mental health services and an order compelling psychoactive medications. Appellant’s court

- appointed attorn ey filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). See In re L.E.H. , 228 S.W.3d 219, 220 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 2007, no pet.) (applying Anders procedure in appeal from court ordered mental health commitment). Counsel conclude s the appeals have no merit. Counsel provided K.K.S. with a copy of the brief and informed her of her right to review the record and file her own brief; however, K.K.S. did not file a pro se brief. See Nichols v. State , 954 S.W.2d 83, 85

- 86 (Tex. App.

— Sa n Antonio 1997, no pet.); Bruns v. State , 924 S.W.2d 176, 177 n.1 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 1996, no pet.).04

- 10

- 00589

- CV & 04

- 10

- 00590

- CV

- 2

- After reviewing the record and counsel’s brief, we agree that the appeals are frivolous and without merit. The judgment and order of the trial court are affirmed, and appellate counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted. See Nichols v. State , 954 S.W.2d at 86; Bruns , 924 S.W.2d at 177 n.1. Rebecca Simmons, Justice
#### § 993.174 Records.

Each handler shall maintain such records as are necessary to furnish the reports required to be submitted to the Committee by him under this subpart including, but not limited to, records of all transactions on prunes received, held and disposed of by him, and he shall retain such records for at least two years after the end of the crop year in which the applicable transaction occurred.

[26 FR 8281, Sept. 2, 1961; 26 FR 8483, Sept. 9, 1961. Redesignated at 30 FR 13312, Oct. 20, 1965]
2429.101 Resolving tax problems.       In order to have uniformity in HUD's treatment of the tax aspects of contracting and ensure effective cooperation with other Government agencies on tax matters of mutual interest, the Office of General Counsel has the responsibility within HUD for handling all those tax problems. Therefore, the contracting activity will not engage in negotiation with any taxing authority for the purpose of determining the validity or applicability of, or obtaining exemptions from or refund of, any tax. When a problem exists, the Contracting Officer shall request, in writing, the assistance of legal counsel. The request shall detail the problem and be accompanied by appropriate backup data. Counsel shall report to the Contracting Officer as to the necessary disposition of the tax problem. The Contracting Officer will notify the contractor of the outcome of the tax problem. Counsel is responsible for communications with the Department of Justice for representation or intervention in proceedings concerning taxes.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 2429.1 - General
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER, SECTION 906

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Michael A. Hart, the Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) of NF Investment Corp. (the Company), hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| |  |  | the Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2015 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-K), fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: March 21, 2017/s/ Michael A. HartMichael A. Hart
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)




|* | The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
|- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1213.7001 Solicitation provision and contract

clause.

(a) Contracting officers shall insert the provision as prescribed at 1252.237–71, Certification of Data,

in all solicitations and requests for quotations, and the clause as prescribed at 1252.237–72,

Prohibition on Advertising, in solicitations, requests for quotations, and all contracts (e.g., purchase

orders, SF 182s) for training services when the content and/or presentation of the training is

controlled by DOT.

(b) Contracting officers shall incorporate the successful offeror's certified data into any resultant

contract(s). Certified data may be adopted by reference, if the contracting officer determines it

contains information sufficient to reliably describe the certified data submitted. For example, this

type of information includes dated material such as resumes and company or personnel

qualifications.

Parent topic: Subpart 1213.70—Department of Transportation Procedures for Acquiring Training

Services
# Subpart 627.2—Patents and Copyrights

**Parent topic:**PART 627—PATENTS, DATA, AND COPYRIGHTS

## 627.201 Patent and copyright infringement liability.

## 627.201-2 Contract clauses.

(e) The Procurement Executive is the agency head's designee for the purposes of FAR 27.201–2(e).
Exhibit 13.1

Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F (the Report) of QIWI plc (the Company) for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2013 as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, Sergey Solonin, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Alexander Karavaev, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

(1) The Report
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the issuer.



|                       |  |                        
|---------------------- |  | -----------------------
|/s/ Sergey Solonin    
|Name:                  |  | Sergey Solonin         
|Title:                 |  | Chief Executive Officer
|Date:                  |  | March 12, 2014         
|                      
|/s/ Alexander Karavaev
|Name:                  |  | Alexander Karavaev     
|Title:                 |  | Chief Financial Officer
|Date:                  |  | March 12, 2014         

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided
to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant
to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm






New Source Energy Partners L.P.


Oklahoma City, Oklahoma




We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-186673) of our reports dated April 1, 2013, relating to (i) the carve-out financial statements of the Properties Contributed to New Source Energy Partners L.P. and (ii) the balance sheet of New Source Energy Partners L.P., which appear in New Source Energy Partners L.P.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012.




/s/ BDO USA, LLP




Houston, TX


April 1, 2013
2805.502 Authority.       (a) The HCA or designee is the agency head for approving the publication of paid advertisements in newspapers under FAR 5.502(a).          (b) Authority to place advertisements in media other than newspapers must be granted in writing in advance by the HCA, or designee. No advertisement, notice, or proposal should be published prior to receipt of advance written approval for such publication by the HCA or designee, and no voucher or invoice for any such advertisement or publication will be paid unless there is presented, with the voucher or invoice, a copy of the written approval. Approval shall not be granted retroactively.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 2805.5 - Paid Advertisements
Editorial Note on Part 34
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 34 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

§ 34.23 Locking of radiographic exposure devices, storage containers and source changers. ( a ) Each radiographic exposure device must have a lock or outer locked container designed to prevent unauthorized or accidental removal of the sealed source from its shielded position. The exposure device and/or its container must be kept locked (and if a keyed-lock, with the key removed at all times) when not under the direct surveillance of a radiographer or a radiographer's assistant except at permanent radiographic installations as stated in § 34.51. In addition, during radiographic operations the sealed source assembly must be secured in the shielded position each time the source is returned to that position.
( b ) Each sealed source storage container and source changer must have a lock or outer locked container designed to prevent unauthorized or accidental removal of the sealed source from its shielded position. Storage containers and source changers must be kept locked (and if a keyed-lock, with the key removed at all times) when containing sealed sources except when under the direct surveillance of a radiographer or a radiographer's assistant.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 243 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                          May 23, 2005.
Whereas recreational boating is one of our Nation's most popular pastimes, with 
        an estimated 78,000,000 recreational boaters in the United States and 
        nearly 13,000,000 recreational vessels registered;
Whereas the number of recreational boating fatalities has declined by more than 
        half since 1970, thanks to the increased use of life jackets, 
        cooperative boating safety education, enforcement efforts between the 
        Coast Guard and State governments, and safer vessels and equipment 
        manufactured in accordance with Coast Guard standards;
Whereas recreational boating accidents have nevertheless claimed the lives of 
        703 Americans in 2003, more than half of whose lives could have been 
        saved with the proper use of a personal flotation device;
Whereas a continued emphasis on accident prevention can reduce recreational 
        boating fatalities still further, and in particular deaths by drowning, 
        which remain the leading cause of recreational boating fatalities; and
Whereas the National Safe Boating Council, with the support of the Coast Guard 
        and the Coast Guard Auxiliary, has proposed designating the week of May 
        21 through 27, 2005, as National Safe Boating Week: Now, therefore, be 
        it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) supports initiatives for recreational boating safety education 
        and accident prevention to minimize the number of annual recreational 
        boating fatalities;
            (2) recognizes the Coast Guard, the Coast Guard Auxiliary, and the 
        National Safe Boating Council for their efforts each year during May to 
        highlight the importance of safe recreational boating; and
            (3) supports the goals of National Safe Boating Week.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
#### Wiliam J. Sears, Respondent, v. Irene Sears, Appellant.

In an action for divorce, defendant appeals from so much of an order of the -Supreme Court, Queens County, entered November 19, 1969, as, upon reargument, adhered to the original decision awarding her temporary alimony and child support and a counsel fee. Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs. In our opinion, appellant is not precluded from application to the trial court for additional counsel fees. We do not construe the order in question as expressly precluding the making of such application. The temporary alimony award in this case is rather low, but this court frowns upon appeals taken for the purpose of questioning such *pendente lite*awards. As was observed in *Gentile*v. *Gentile*(19 A D 2d 825), " The best protection to both parties against any unfairness in the -fixing of temporary alimony on the basis of affidavits is a speedy trial rather than an appeal.” (See, also, *Zeitlan*v. Zeitlan, 27 A D 2d 846.) Rabin, Acting P. J., Martuscello, Kleinfeld and Benjamin, JJ., concur; Latham, J., not voting.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

EASTERN DIVISION 

BERTHA ALLEN, ) 

 ) 

 Plaintiff, ) 

 ) 

v. ) Civil Action No. 3:06-cv-00772-WKW-DRB 

 ) 

TALLAPOOSA COUNTY ) 

JAIL STAFF, et al. ) 

 ) 

DEFENDANTS. ) 

MOTION TO WITHDRAW

COMES NOW Amanda Kay Morgan of the law firm of Webb & Eley, P.C., and moves 

this Court for permission to withdraw from the representation of Tallapoosa County Sheriff 

Jimmy Abbett, Chief Deputy Kenny Sherrer, Jail Administrator Blake Jennings, Lt. Jason 

Cowart, Sgt. Patricia Guthrie, Sgt. Chris Nail, and Corrections Officer Dodi Shaddix, the 

Defendants in the above-styled cause. As grounds for this Motion, the undersigned states that 

she will be no longer be employed with the firm of Webb & Eley, P.C. Ashley Hawkins 

Freeman will continue to represent Defendants Tallapoosa County Sheriff Jimmy Abbett, Chief 

Deputy Kenny Sherrer, Jail Administrator Blake Jennings, Lt. Jason Cowart, Sgt. Patricia 

Guthrie, Sgt. Chris Nail, and Corrections Officer Dodi Shaddix. 

 WHEREFORE, Amanda Kay Morgan respectfully requests an order from this Court that 

releases her from representation of Defendants Tallapoosa County Sheriff Jimmy Abbett, Chief 

Deputy Kenny Sherrer, Jail Administrator Blake Jennings, Lt. Jason Cowart, Sgt. Patricia 

Guthrie, Sgt. Chris Nail, and Corrections Officer Dodi Shaddix. 

Case 3:06-cv-00772-WKW-TFM Document 15 Filed 01/03/2007 Page 1 of 2
2

Respectfully submitted this 3rd day of January, 2007. 

s/Amanda Kay Morgan 

ASHLEY HAWKINS FREEMAN Bar No. FRE044 

AMANDA KAY MORGAN Bar No. ALL079 

Attorneys for Defendants 

WEBB & ELEY, P.C. 

7475 Halcyon Pointe Drive 

Post Office Box 240909 

Montgomery, Alabama 36124 

Telephone: (334) 262-1850 

Fax: (334) 262-1889 

E-mail: amorgan@webbeley.com

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

 I hereby certify that on this the 3rd day of January, 2007, I have electronically filed the 

foregoing with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system, and that I have mailed a true 

and correct copy of the foregoing by United States Mail, postage prepaid, to the following nonCM/ECF participant: 

Bertha Allen 

AIS 134004 

Julia Tutwiler Prison for Women 

8966 U. S. Highway 231 North 

Wetumpka, AL 36092 

 s/Amanda Kay Morgan 

 OF COUNSEL 

Case 3:06-cv-00772-WKW-TFM Document 15 Filed 01/03/2007 Page 2 of 2
SUBPART 17.1 – MULTIYEAR CONTRACTING    *(Revised February 17, 2017 through PROCLTR 2017-10)* **Parent topic:** PART 17 – SPECIAL CONTRACTING METHODS17.170 General.    (c) HCAs are delegated authority to enter into a multiyear contract for services and supplies; and may delegate this authority, without power of redelegation, to the CCO. The DLA Energy HCA is delegated authority to enter into a multiyear contract for services pursuant to DFARS 217.174, with redelegation permissible to the CCO only.       (d)(4) HCAs must submit notification to the DLA Acquisition Operations Division at least 60 days before awarding a multiyear contract.
#### In the Matter of Peter J. Villanueva, Appellant, v Glenn S. Goord, as Commissioner of Correctional Services, et al., Respondents.

[815 NYS2d 312]

Spain, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (McNamara, J.), entered April 19, 2005 in Albany County, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of respondents calculating petitioner’s jail time credit.

On September 9, 2003, petitioner was sentenced to three one-year terms of incarceration, two of which were to run consecutively, stemming from an incident in which he, among other things, falsified records. Thereafter, on March 5, 2004, petitioner was sentenced to a term of imprisonment of 2 to 4 years, to run concurrently with his initial sentence, as a consequence of his conviction for identity theft. Finally, on May 7, 2004, petitioner was sentenced in accordance with an attempted assault conviction to another term of imprisonment of 2 to 4 years, to run *1098nunc pro tunc to and concurrently with his second sentence. After petitioner’s jail time credit was established, he commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding asserting that the 178 days in jail that he served from September 9, 2003 to March 5, 2004 should be included in his total credit. Supreme Court dismissed the petition, prompting this appeal. We now affirm.

Although jail time credit is authorized for time “spent in custody prior to the commencement of such sentence as a result of the charge that culminated in the sentence,” jail time credit “shall not include any time that is credited against the term or maximum term of any previously imposed sentence ... to which the person is subject” (Penal Law § 70.30 [3]). Here, the 178 days in question were properly counted as time served in connection with petitioner’s September 2003 sentence and thus not credited against his March 2004 and May 2004 sentences *(see*Penal Law § 70.30 [3]; *Matter of Jeffrey v Ward,*44 NY2d 812, 813-814 [1978]; *Matter of Kalamis v Smith,*42 NY2d 191, 200-202 [1977] ; *Matter of Du Bois v Goord,*271 AD2d 874, 875 [2000]). In addition, we are unpersuaded by petitioner’s contention that respondents lacked authority to question a prior, inaccurate jail time certificate issued by the local law enforcement authority. Ultimately, respondents properly relied on the last certificate issued, which expressly superceded the prior certificate upon which petitioner relies.

Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Mugglin and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.
PGI 209.105-1 Obtaining information.       (1) GSA's System for Award Management (SAM), which is available at                 https://sam.gov             , identifies entities excluded throughout the U.S. Government (unless otherwise noted) from receiving Federal contracts or certain subcontracts and from certain types of Federal financial and non-financial assistance and benefits. The SAM website provides useful documents and online training to assist with SAM navigation and data entry. User Guides and Demonstration Videos can be found in the User Help section after clicking the HELP link at the top of the website homepage. The former Excluded Parties List System (EPLS) information is within the Performance Information functional area of SAM, and is maintained as “Exclusions” data. Exclusions are located in the Data Access area of SAM which can be accessed by navigating the following path after logging into the SAM website. Select Tab – MYSAM, Tab - Data Access, and Tab – Exclusions.          (i) Multiple agencies have the authority to suspend or debar entities from “doing business” with the Government. There are approximately 71 separate cause and treatment codes under which entities have been suspended or debarred or excluded. New exclusion records created in SAM will no longer be identified with cause and treatment codes. Exclusions will be associated with one of four exclusion types: Preliminarily Ineligible (Proceedings Pending), Ineligible (Proceedings Completed), Prohibition/Restriction, Voluntary Exclusion. Each cause and treatment code is linked to one exclusion type.          (ii) The exclusion type advises readers of the nature of the exclusion, debarment, or suspension and how those listed in the SAM Exclusions should be treated. However, the fact that an entity is listed in the SAM Exclusions does not necessarily mean the entity is ineligible for contract award. Review of the exclusion type is crucial in ensuring that listed entities are not deprived of their “liberty interest” in conducting business with the Government.          (iii) When the Department of Justice Bureau of Justice Assistance debars individuals under 10 U.S.C. 4656, they are placed in the SAM Exclusions under cause and treatment code FF (Reciprocal), which is now linked to exclusion type, Ineligible (Proceedings Completed). The records for individuals currently entered into EPLS and listed under this cause and treatment code can be found in the SAM Exclusions. Records created in EPLS have both a cause and treatment code and an exclusion type listed.          (2) The contracting officer shall consider the information available in the Supplier Performance Risk System during the evaluation of quotations and offers received in response to a solicitation and in the determination of the contractor’s responsibility. In addition, the contracting officer shall document the contract file regarding any action taken as a result of information obtained from the Supplier Performance Risk System.    **Parent topic:** PGI 209.105 RESERVED
829.303 Application of State and local taxes to Government contractors and subcontractors.       (a) The authority to make the determination prescribed in FAR 29.303(a) is delegated, without power of redelegation, to the head of the contracting activity (HCA).    **Parent topic:** Subpart 829.3 - State and Local Taxes