alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Beasley *v.*Phœnix Insurance Company. Beasley *v.*Athens Mutual Insurance Company.

Fish, C. J.

The policies of insurance upon which the respective actions were brought insured a certain stock of goods in stated amounts, and were issued subject to the following among other express conditions and stipulations, viz.: “One thousand dollars other insurance permitted. . This entire policy, unless otherwise provided by agreement endorsed hereon or added hereto, shall be void if the insured now has or shall hereafter make or procure any contract of insurance, whether valid *127or not, on property covered in whole or in part by this policy. This policy is made and accepted subject to the foregoing stipulations and conditions, . . no officer, agent, or other representative of this company shall have the power to waive any provision or condition of this policy except such as by the terms of this policy may be the subject of agreement endorsed hereon or added hereto, and as to such provisions and conditions no officer, agent, or representative shall have such' power or be deemed or held to have waived such provisions or conditions unless such waiver, if any, shall be written upon or attached hereto, nor shall any privilege or permission affecting the insurance under this policy exist or be claimed by the insured unless so written or attached.” *Held,*that the company did not waive its right to plead as a defense that the policies had been rendered void because the insured, in violation of their terms and conditions, without the consent of the company, had taken out additional insurance on the stock of goods in a sum larger than that authorized by the policies; nor was the company estopped from setting up such defense by reason of the facts, sought to be proved, that the agent who issued the policies knew, for about ten days prior to the fire which destroyed the goods, that the insured had, subsequently to the issuance of the policies sued on, procured such excessive additional insurance, and failed during that time to notify the insured that the policies had been forfeited, and also failed to return the unearned portion of the premiums, but, by oral statements, led- the insured to believe that the policies were then in force, and urged the insured to allow him to write other insurance on the goods. *Morris*v. *Orient Insurance Co.,*106 *Ca.*472 (33 S. E. 430) ; *Lippman*v. *Ætna Insurance Co.,*108 *Ga.*391 (33 S. E. 897, 75 Am. St. R. 62); Id.120 *Ga.*247 (47 S. E. 593) ; *Johnson*v. *Ætna Insurance Co.,*123 *Ga.*404 (51 S. E. 339, 107 Am. St. R. 92) ; *Athens Mutual Insurance Co*v. *Evans,*132 *Ga.*703 (64 S. E 993); Civil Code, § 2489; 2 Cooley’s Briefs on Insurance, 1045. *A*nonsuit was properly awarded in each ease.

June 13, 1913.

Actions upon insurance policies. Before Judge Frank Park. Mitchell superior court. October 9, 1911.

*Pope & Bennet,-*for plaintiff.

*Slaton & Phillips*and *B. E. Cox,*for defendants.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION

SOUTHEASTERN BOLL WEEVIL )

ERADICATION FOUNDATION, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

v. ) 2:06cv756-MHT

) 

BOLL WEEVIL ERADICATION )

FOUNDATION OF GEORGIA, )

INC., and TOMMY IRVIN, in )

his capacity as Trustee )

of Boll Weevil Eradication )

Foundation of Georgia, )

Inc., )

)

Defendants. )

ORDER

It is ORDERED that the motions for admission pro hac

vice (doc. nos. 29 & 30) are granted.

DONE, this the 28th day of March, 2007.

 /s/ Myron H. Thompson 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00756-MHT-WC Document 31 Filed 03/28/2007 Page 1 of 1
§ 110.70 Public notice of receipt of an application. ( a ) The Commission will notice the receipt of each license application, including applications for amendment or renewal, for an export or import for which a specific license is required by making a copy available at the NRC Web site, *http://www.nrc.gov .*
( b ) The Commission will also publish in the Federal Register a notice of receipt of each license application, including applications for amendment or renewal, to export the following: ( 1 ) A production or utilization facility.
( 2 ) Five effective kilograms or more of plutonium, high-enriched uranium or uranium-233.
( 3 ) 10,000 kilograms or more of heavy water for nuclear end use. (Note: Does not apply to exports of heavy water to Canada for nuclear end use.)
( 4 ) Nuclear grade graphite for nuclear end use.
( 5 ) Radioactive waste.
( c ) The Commission will also publish in the Federal Register a notice of receipt of a license application, including applications for amendment or renewal, for an import of radioactive waste for which a specific license is required.
[75 FR 44093, July 28, 2010, as amended at 86 FR 55479, Oct. 6, 2021]
Case 3:06-cv-00772-WKW-TFM Document 18 Filed 03/07/2007 Page 1 of 3
Case 3:06-cv-00772-WKW-TFM Document 18 Filed 03/07/2007 Page 2 of 3
Case 3:06-cv-00772-WKW-TFM Document 18 Filed 03/07/2007 Page 3 of 3
Case 3:06-cv-00772-WKW-TFM Document 18-2 Filed 03/07/2007 Page 1 of 6
Case 3:06-cv-00772-WKW-TFM Document 18-2 Filed 03/07/2007 Page 2 of 6
Case 3:06-cv-00772-WKW-TFM Document 18-2 Filed 03/07/2007 Page 3 of 6
Case 3:06-cv-00772-WKW-TFM Document 18-2 Filed 03/07/2007 Page 4 of 6
Case 3:06-cv-00772-WKW-TFM Document 18-2 Filed 03/07/2007 Page 5 of 6
Case 3:06-cv-00772-WKW-TFM Document 18-2 Filed 03/07/2007 Page 6 of 6
* Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions

that have no precedential value and merely decide particular cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 95-60049 Conference Calendar

__________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus DAVID EARL HUGHES, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi USDC No. 3:94cv618BN (J91-000094(B))

- - - - - - - - - - June 29, 1995 Before JONES, WIENER, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * David Earl Hughes has appealed the district court's dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to vacate, set aside or correct his sentence for escape from federal custody. Hughes argues that he should be resentenced because his co-defendants were treated more leniently.No. 9 -2- The court declines to consider this argument because Hughes did not raise it in the district court. See Varnado v. Lynaugh , 920 F.2d 320, 321 (5th Cir. 1991). Hughes is hereby warned that future filings of frivolous documents will result in the imposition of sanctions. See Smith v. McCleod , 946 F.2d 417, 418 (5th Cir. 1991); Jackson v. Carpenter , 921 F.2d 68, 69 (5th Cir. 1991). APPEAL DISMISSED.
813.003-70 General policy.

(a) The Veterans First Contracting Program in subpart 819.70 applies to VA contracts, orders and

BPAs under this part and has precedence over other small business programs referenced in FAR

parts 13 and 19. For VA policy regarding mandatory Government sources, refer to 808.002.

(b) Notwithstanding FAR 13.003(b)(2), the contracting officer shall make an award utilizing the

priorities for veteran-owned small businesses as implemented within the VA hierarchy of small

business program preferences, the Veterans First Contracting Program in subpart 819.70.

Specifically, the contracting officer shall consider preferences for verified service-disabled veteranowned small businesses (SDVOSBs) first, then preferences for verified veteran-owned small

businesses (VOSBs). These priorities will be followed by preferences for other small businesses in

accordance with 819.7005.

(c) When using competitive procedures, the preference for restricting competition to verified

SDVOSBs/VOSBs in accordance with paragraph (b) of this section is mandatory whenever market

research provides a reasonable expectation of receiving two or more offers/quotes from eligible,

capable and verified firms, and that an award can be made at a fair and reasonable price that offers

best value to the Government.

(1) Pursuant to 38 U.S.C. 8127, contracts under this part shall be set-aside for SDVOSBs/VOSBs, in

accordance with 819.7006 or 819.7007 when supported by market research. Contracting officers

shall use the applicable set-aside clause prescribed at 819.7011.

(2) Pursuant to 38 U.S.C. 8128 and to the extent that market research does not support an SDVOSB

or VOSB set-aside, the contracting officer shall include evaluation factors as prescribed at

815.304-70 and the evaluation criteria clause prescribed at 815.304-71(a).

(d) The SDVOSB and VOSB eligibility requirements in 819.7003 apply, including verification of the

SDVOSB and VOSB status of an offeror, and other small business requirements in 13 CFR part 121

and 13 CFR 125.6 (e.g., small business representation, nonmanufacturer rule, and subcontracting

limitations (see 819.7004 and 819.7011)).

Parent topic: PART 813 - SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION PROCEDURES
PGI 209.270-4 Procedures.

(1) Policies and procedures applicable to aviation critical safety item design control activities are in

DoD Manual 4140.01, Volume 11, DoD Supply Chain Materiel Management Procedures: Inventory

Accountability and Special Management and Handling, DoD Aviation Critical Safety Item

(CSI)/Flight Safety Critical Aircraft Part (FSCAP) Program. This regulation provides direction on

establishing criticality determinations, identification of aviation critical safety items in the Federal

Logistics Information System, and related requirements.

(2) Procedures for management of aviation critical safety items and ship critical safety items are

available at http://www.dscr.dla.mil/ExternalWeb/UserWeb/AviationEngineering/Technic.... This web

site provides detailed life-cycle procedures for aviation and ship critical safety items, from initial

identification through disposal, as well as a detailed list of definitions applicable to aviation and ship

critical safety items.

Parent topic: PGI 209.270 Aviation and ship critical safety items.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

NICHOLAS STRICKLAND, et al., )

)

Plaintiffs )

)

v. ) 1:06-CV-00682-DRB

) [wo]

CHAMPION ENTERPRISES, INC., et al., )

)

Defendants. )

ORDER ON MOTION

For good cause shown in Plaintiffs’ Motion to Seal (Doc. 22, filed Nov. 30, 2006) and pursuant

to Paragraph b of the Order on Motion and Stipulated Protective Order-Confidentiality (Doc 17), it is

ORDERED that the Motion to Seal (Doc. 22) is GRANTED. Accordingly, the Clerk is

DIRECTED to place under seal all of the submissions tendered by Plaintiffs on November 30, 2006,

as Plaintiffs’ Response to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, or in the Alternative, Motion for Summary

Judgment, and the parties are directed to treat such exhibits accordingly. 

DONE this 1 day of December, 2006. st

/s/ Delores R. Boyd

DELORES R. BOYD

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00682-TFM Document 23 Filed 12/01/2006 Page 1 of 1
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v James Lott, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed (see *People v Boodle,*47 NY2d 398). (Appeal from judgment of Erie County Court—attempted criminal possession of weapon, third degree.) Present—Hancock, Jr., J. P., Schnepp, Callahan, Doerr and Witmer, JJ.
Subpart 2828.1 - Bonds and Other Financial

Protections

Parent topic: PART 2828 - BONDS AND INSURANCE

2828.101 Bid guarantees.

2828.101-1 Policy on use.

The HCA or designee is the agency head for the purposes of authorizing class waivers in accordance

with FAR 28.101-1(c).

2828.106 Administration.

2828.106-6 Furnishing information.

In accordance with FAR 28.106-6(c), the HCA, or designee at a level at or above the BPC, is the

agency official authorized to furnish the certified copy of the bond and the contract.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3256 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3256

  To suspend temporarily the duty on ground fault circuit interrupter 
                    receptacles of 15 amps or less.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 26, 2006

Mr. Frist (for Mrs. Dole) introduced the following bill; which was read 
             twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To suspend temporarily the duty on ground fault circuit interrupter 
                    receptacles of 15 amps or less.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN GROUND FAULT CIRCUIT INTERRUPTER RECEPTACLES OF 15 
              AMPS OR LESS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

      

``      9902.85.30        Ground fault circuit    Free      No change       No change       On or before 12/
                           interrupter                                                       31/2009          ''
                           receptacles of 15                                                                   .
                           amps or less
                           (provided for in
                           subheading
                           8536.30.80)..........

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
161 So.2d 283

#### DIESEL EQUIPMENT CORPORATION v. Al EPSTEIN and Al Epstein, Inc.

No. 47099.

March 16, 1964.

Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit.

159 So.2d 1.

It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be notified.
Promissory Note dated December 26, 1995



 Exhibit 10(aa) 
 PROMISSORY NOTE 
  

			
	$3,000,000.00	 	Irving, Texas
		 	December 26, 1995

 For value
received, First American Real Estate Information Services, Inc., a California corporation (“Maker”), promises to pay to the order of First American Home Buyers Protection Corporation, a California corporation (“Payee”), the
principal sum of Three Million and no/100 ($3,000,000.00), with interest on the balance of principal remaining from time-to-time outstanding and unpaid from January 1, 1996, until paid, at the rate of eight and seventy-five one hundredths
percent (8.75%) per annum. 
 Said principal and interest shall be due and payable in equal quarterly installments
commencing on the 1st day of April, 1996, with quarterly payments continuing in each calendar year thereafter until January 1, 2011, when the entire unpaid balance of principal, together with all accrued interest thereon remaining unpaid, shall
be due and payable in full. 
 Each payment made on this note shall be applied first to accrued interest, and the balance
thereof shall be applied to installments of principal then due or to become due hereunder in the order of their maturity. This note may be prepaid at any time or time, in whole or in part, without notice or penalty. Prepayments of principal shall be
applied in the order of maturity. Principal that is prepaid shall cease to bear interest from the date of prepayment. 
 Should
interest not be so paid, it shall thereafter bear like interest as the principal, but such unpaid interest so compounded shall not exceed an amount equal to simple interest on the unpaid principal at the maximum rate permitted by law. Should default
be made in the payment of any installment of interest or principal when due, all unpaid principal and accrued interest shall become immediately due and payable at the option of the holder of this note. Should suit be commenced or an attorney be
employed to enforce the payment of this note, Maker agrees to pay such additional sum as the court may adjudge reasonable as attorneys’ fees in said suit. Principal and interest shall be paid in lawful money of the United States. 
 Payment of the indebtedness evidenced by this note is secured by a deed of trust of even date herewith to First American Title Insurance
Company, a California corporation, as trustee. 







 This note is made under, and shall be construed and enforced in accordance with, the laws of
the State of Texas. 
  

			
	FIRST AMERICAN REAL ESTATE INFORMATION SERVICES, INC.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ H. John Herkenhoff

		 	H. John Herkenhoff, Senior Vice President


  

 Page 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S.$
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1997 
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                          1 
<CASH>                                                 896 
<SECURITIES>                                             0 
<RECEIVABLES>                                          923 
<ALLOWANCES>                                          (196) 
<INVENTORY>                                          1,301 
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     3,055 
<PP&E>                                               3,509 
<DEPRECIATION>                                      (2,605)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       4,037 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                1,364 
<BONDS>                                                  0 
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0 
<PREFERRED>                                          2,250 
<COMMON>                                                16 
<OTHER-SE>                                             282 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         4,037 
<SALES>                                                958 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       958 
<CGS>                                                  880 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        1,293 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                        55 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       9 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     (1,279)
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      0 
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0 
<CHANGES>                                                0 
<NET-INCOME>                                        (1,279)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         (.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         (.09)
                                                           
                                               

</TABLE>
Unassociated Document


    ZOO
ENTERTAINMENT, INC.

    AMENDMENT
NO. 2 TO 2007 EMPLOYEE, DIRECTOR AND

    CONSULTANT
STOCK PLAN

    


    This Amendment No. 2 (the “Amendment”)
to the Zoo Entertainment, Inc. (the “Company”) 2007 Employee, Director and
Consultant Stock Plan, as amended (the “Plan”), is hereby effective as of
February 11, 2010.  Capitalized terms used in this Amendment and not
otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the
Plan.

    


    WHEREAS, the Company enacted
the Plan in accordance with the purposes set forth therein; and

    


    WHEREAS, Section 31 of the
Plan reserves to the Company’s board of directors (the “Board”) the power in its
discretion to amend the Plan at any time and from time to time subject to
applicable law and the rights of the Participants on the date of such action;
and

    


    WHEREAS, the Board deems it
appropriate to amend the Plan to revise the aggregate number of Shares which may
be issued from time to time pursuant to the Plan from four million (4,000,000)
shares to one million, two hundred eight thousand, four hundred and nine
(1,208,409) shares; and

    


    WHEREAS, the Board deems it
appropriate to amend the Plan to revise the maximum number of Shares with
respect to which Stock Rights may be granted to any Participant in any fiscal
year from seven hundred fifty thousand (750,000) to three hundred thousand
(300,000).

    


    NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is
hereby amended as set forth below:

    


    1.  Section
3(a) of the Plan is hereby amended by deleting “four million (4,000,000)” from
the second line thereof and inserting “one million, two hundred eight thousand,
four hundred and nine (1,208,409)” in its place.

    


    2.  Section
4(c) of the Plan is hereby amended by deleting “750,000” from the third line
thereof and inserting “300,000” in its place.

    


    3.  The
Plan shall remain in full force and effect except as specifically amended
herein.
Case 1:06-cv-00775-TFM Document 18 Filed 10/20/2006 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:06-cv-00775-TFM Document 18 Filed 10/20/2006 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:06-cv-00775-TFM Document 18-2 Filed 10/20/2006 Page 1 of 1