alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 129 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 129

 Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Armed Services 
                   in the One Hundred Ninth Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 1, 2005

 Mr. Hunter submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                 the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Armed Services 
                   in the One Hundred Ninth Congress.

    Resolved, 

SECTION 1. AMOUNTS FOR COMMITTEE EXPENSES.

    For the expenses of the Committee on Armed Services (hereafter in 
this resolution referred to as the ``Committee''), including the 
expenses of all staff salaries, there shall be paid, out of the 
applicable accounts of the House of Representatives for committee 
salaries and expenses, not more than $13,333,137.00 for the One Hundred 
Ninth Congress.

SEC. 2. SESSION LIMITATIONS.

    Of the amount specified in section 1--
            (1) not more than $6,387,373.00 shall be available for 
        expenses incurred during the period beginning at noon on 
        January 3, 2005, and ending immediately before noon on January 
        3, 2006; and
            (2) not more than $6,945,764.00 shall be available for 
        expenses incurred during the period beginning at noon on 
        January 3, 2006, and ending immediately before noon on January 
        3, 2007.

SEC. 3. VOUCHERS.

    Payments under this resolution shall be made on vouchers authorized 
by the Committee, signed by the Chairman of the Committee, and approved 
in the manner directed by the Committee on House Administration.

SEC. 4. REGULATIONS.

    Amounts made available under this resolution shall be expended in 
accordance with regulations prescribed by the Committee on House 
Administration.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|  | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                Company. |
|--|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |                                                                        |                             |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------|
|   |                                                                             | /s/              Barry J. Pardon |
|   | Barry                  J. Pardon, PresidentSimclar,                    Inc. |
|   | May                15, 2008                                                 |

----
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

BERTHA ALLEN, #134004, )

)

 Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:06-CV-772-WKW

)

TALLAPOOSA COUNTY JAIL STAFF, et) al., 

)

 Defendants. )

ORDER ON MOTION

Upon consideration of the motion for extension of time filed by the defendants on

September 21, 2006 (Court Doc. No. 8), and for good cause, it is 

ORDERED that this motion be and is hereby GRANTED to the extent allowed by

this order. It is further

ORDERED that the defendants be GRANTED an extension from October 9, 2006

to and including October 30, 2006 to file their special report and answer. 

Done this 25th day of September, 2006. 

/s/ Delores R. Boyd

DELORES R. BOYD

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-00772-WKW-TFM Document 9 Filed 09/25/2006 Page 1 of 1
§ 205.282 Evaluation of petition by the Office of Hearings and Appeals. ( a ) After considering the Petition, the Director of the Office of Hearings and Appeals or his designee shall issue a Proposed Decision and Order. The Proposed Decision and Order shall generally describe the nature of the particular refund proceeding and shall set forth the standards and procedures that the Office of Hearings and Appeals intends to apply in evaluating refund claims.
( b ) The Proposed Decision and Order shall be published in the Federal Register together with a statement that any member of the public may submit written comments to the Office of Hearings and Appeals with respect to the matter. At least 30 days following publication in the Federal Register shall be provided for the submission of comments.
( c ) After considering the comments submitted, the Director of the Office of Hearings and Appeals or his designee shall issue a final Decision and Order which shall govern the disposition of the refunds. The final Decision and Order shall also be published in the Federal Register.
( d ) The final Decision and Order shall set forth the standards and procedures that will be used in evaluating individual Applications for Refunds and distributing the refund amount. Those standards and procedures shall be consistent with the provisions of this subpart.
( e ) In establishing standards and procedures for implementing refund distributions, the Office of Hearings and Appeals shall take into account the desirability of distributing the refunds in an efficient, effective and equitable manner and resolving to the maximum extent practicable all outstanding claims. In order to do so, the standards for evaluation of individual claims may be based upon appropriate presumptions.
# SUBCHAPTER F - SPECIAL CATEGORIES OF CONTRACTING

- PART 2137 - SERVICE CONTRACTING 

- PART 2137 - SERVICE CONTRACTING     - Subpart 2137.1 - Service Contracts - General     - 2137.102   Policy.
    - 2137.110   Contract clause.
#### Maddox, administrator, *v.*Giles.

May 15, 1913.

Claim. Before Judge Daniel. Butts superior court. May 21, 1912.

*J. F. Carmichael*and *Andrew W. Lane,*for plaintiff.

*C. L. Redman, O. M. Duke,*and *J. T. Moore,*for defendant.

Fish, C. J.

The grounds of the motion for new trial are not meritorious. There was evidence to authorize the verdict, and the court did not err in refusing a new trial. *Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
Editorial Note on Part 2
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

§ 2.800 Scope and applicability. ( a ) This subpart governs the issuance, amendment, and repeal of regulations in which participation by interested persons is prescribed under Section 553 of title 5 of the U.S. Code.
( b ) The procedures in §§ 2.804 through 2.810 apply to all rulemakings.
( c ) The procedures in §§ 2.802 through 2.803 apply to all petitions for rulemaking except for initial applications for standard design certification rulemaking under subpart B of part 52 of this chapter, and subsequent petitions for amendment of an existing design certification rule filed by the original applicant for the design certification rule.
( d ) The procedures in §§ 2.811 through 2.819, as supplemented by the provisions of subpart B of part 52, apply to standard design certification rulemaking.
[72 FR 49481, Aug. 28, 2007]
```

[109th Congress Public Law 333]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ333.109]

[[Page 120 STAT. 1773]]

Public Law 109-333
109th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
  950 Missouri Avenue in East St. Louis, Illinois, as the ``Katherine 
 Dunham Post Office Building''. <<NOTE: Oct. 12, 2006 -  [H.R. 5929]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. KATHERINE DUNHAM POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 950 Missouri Avenue in East St. Louis, Illinois, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Katherine Dunham Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Katherine 
Dunham Post Office Building''.

    Approved October 12, 2006.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 5929:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 152 (2006):
            Sept. 28, considered and passed House.
            Sept. 29, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
839.000 Scope of part.

This part prescribes acquisition policies and procedures for use in acquiring VA information

technology and information technology-related contracts (see 802.101) and applies to both VAprocured information technology systems as well as interagency acquisitions defined in FAR part 17

and part 817.

Parent topic: PART 839 - ACQUISITION OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
§ 984.46 Research and development. ( a ) *Research and development authorities.* The Board, with the approval of the Secretary, may establish or provide for the establishment of production research, marketing research and development projects, and marketing promotion, including paid advertising, designed to assist, improve, or promote the marketing, distribution, and consumption or efficient production of walnuts. The expenses of such projects shall be paid from funds collected pursuant to §§ 984.69 and 984.70 and may be credited back pursuant to paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section.
( b ) *Credit-back for promotion expenses.* The Board may provide for crediting the pro rata expense assessment obligations of a handler with such portion of his or her direct expenditure for marketing promotion, including paid advertising, as may be authorized. The credit-back amount available to each handler shall be determined by that handler's percent of the industry's total volume of walnuts handled during the prior marketing year multiplied by the current marketing year's credit-back program budget. No handler shall receive credit-back for any creditable expenditures that would exceed the total amount of credit-back available to him or her for the applicable marketing year. Further, no handler shall receive credit-back in an amount that exceeds that handler's assessments paid in the applicable marketing year at the time the credit-back application is made. Marketing promotion expenses shall be credited at a rate recommended by the Board and approved by the Secretary, where the credit rate is based on the amount per dollar of marketing promotion expenses for creditable expenditures paid by a handler during the applicable marketing year. Credit may be paid directly to the handler as a reimbursement of assessments paid or may be issued as recommended by the Board and approved by the Secretary. The Board may also establish, subject to the approval of the Secretary, different credit rates for different products or different marketing promotion activities according to priorities determined by the Board and its marketing plan.
( c ) *Creditable expenditures.* The Board, with the approval of the Secretary, may credit-back all or any portion of a handler's direct expenditures for marketing promotion including paid advertising that promotes the sale of walnuts, walnut products or their uses. Such expenditures may include, but are not limited to, money spent for advertising space or time in newspapers, magazines, radio, television, transit, and outdoor media, including the actual standard agency commission costs not to exceed 15 percent, or as otherwise recommended by the Board and approved by the Secretary.
[86 FR 16289, Mar. 29, 2021]
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Deanna Roth, Appellant. Martin P. Catherwood, as Industrial Commissioner, Respondent.

Reynolds, J.

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board ruling claimant ineligible for benefits effective January 7, *1969*on the ground that she voluntarily left her employment without good cause (Labor Law, § 593, subd. 1, par. [a]). The board has found that claimant terminated her employment at the end of her first day at work on return from vacation, primarily, because her employer did not make prompt payment of her vacation pay; that in doing so she did not give her employer, who did not deny her entitlement to vacation pay, a reasonable opportunity to remedy her grievance, and that her dissatisfactions with employment, “ considered as a whole or separately, did not constitute compelling reasons and therefore good cause for terminating her employment.” “ Good cause ” within the meaning of the Labor Law is a question of fact within the sole province of the board if its determination is supported by substantial evidence (e.g., *Matter of Rubenstein*[Catherwood], 33 A D 2d 950), and such substantial evidence is present in the instant record. Similarly issues of credibility are solely for the board’s evaluation (e.g., *Matter of Witek [Ortiz Funeral Some Corp.-Catherwood],*33 A D 2d 949). Accordingly, the determination must be confirmed. Decision affirmed, without costs. Herlihy, P. J., Reynolds, Greenblott, Cooke and Sweeney, JJ., concur in memorandum by Reynolds, J.
H. Res. 341

In the House of Representatives, U.S., 

June 28, 2005.

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule 

XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the 

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of 

the bill (H.R. 3057) making appropriations for foreign operations, export financing, and related programs for the fiscal 

year ending September 30, 2006, and for other purposes. The 

first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. All points of 

order against consideration of the bill are waived. General debate shall be confined to the bill and shall not exceed one 

hour equally divided and controlled by the chairman and 

ranking minority member of the Committee on Appropriations. After general debate the bill shall be considered for 

amendment under the five-minute rule. Points of order 

against provisions in the bill for failure to comply with clause 

2 of rule XXI are waived except as follows: beginning with 

‘‘or’’ on page 113, line 26, through page 114, line 10. Where 

points of order are waived against part of a section, points 
2

•HRES 341 EH 

of order against a provision in another part of such section 

may be made only against such provision and not against the 

entire section. During consideration of the bill for amendment, the Chairman of the Committee of the Whole may accord priority in recognition on the basis of whether the Member offering an amendment has caused it to be printed in the 

portion of the Congressional Record designated for that purpose in clause 8 of rule XVIII. Amendments so printed shall 

be considered as read. When the committee rises and reports 

the bill back to the House with a recommendation that the 

bill do pass, the previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to final passage 

without intervening motion except one motion to recommit 

with or without instructions. 

Attest:

Clerk.
EXHIBIT 31.2


                   CERTIFICATION BY YONA LEIBOWITZ PURSUANT TO
                       SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT RULE 13A-14

I, Yona Leibowitz, certify that:


1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Clean Systems
Technology Group, Ltd.;


2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;


3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;


4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:


a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;


b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report (the
"Evaluation Date"); and


c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;


5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):


a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and


b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and


6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.


Date: June 6, 2004





/S/ YONA LEIBOWITZ
------------------
CHIEF FINANCIAL
OFFICER




<PAGE>
Editorial Note on Part 34
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 34 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

§ 34.73 Records of inspection and maintenance of radiographic exposure devices, transport and storage containers, associated equipment, source changers, and survey instruments. ( a ) Each licensee shall maintain records specified in § 34.31 of equipment problems found in daily checks and quarterly inspections of radiographic exposure devices, transport and storage containers, associated equipment, source changers, and survey instruments; and retain each record for 3 years after it is made.
( b ) The record must include the date of check or inspection, name of inspector, equipment involved, any problems found, and what repair and/or maintenance, if any, was done.
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

SOUTHEASTERN BOLL WEEVIL ) 

ERADICATION FOUNDATION, ) 

 ) 

 Plaintiff, ) 

v. ) Civil Action No. CV-06-756-MHT 

 ) 

BOLL WEEVIL ERADICATION ) 

FOUNDATION OF GEORGIA, INC.; ) 

TOMMY IRVIN in his capacity as ) Plaintiff Demands Trial 

TRUSTEE OF BOLL WEEVIL ) By Struck Jury on All 

ERADICATION FOUNDATION ) Counts and Claims 

OF GEORGIA, INC. ) 

 ) 

 Defendants. ) 

____________________________________) 

 

SOUTHEASTERN BOLL WEEVIL ERADICATION FOUNDATION’S

ANSWER TO THE AMENDED COUNTER-CLAIM OF

BOLL WEEVIL ERADICATION FOUNDATION OF GEORGIA, INC.

 COMES NOW the Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant, Southeastern Boll Weevil 

Eradication Foundation (hereinafter “Southeastern Foundation”) and for Answer to the Amended 

Counterclaim of Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff, Boll Weevil Eradication Foundation of 

Georgia, Inc. (hereinafter “Georgia Foundation”), Southeastern Foundation adopts and 

incorporates its previously filed answer to the original Counter-Claim of Georgia Foundation as 

if fully setout herein. 

 Respectfully submitted this the 22nd day of May, 2007. 

_____/s/ D. Mitchell Henry____ 

D. MITCHELL HENRY (HEN046) 

Attorney for Plaintiff 

Case 2:06-cv-00756-MHT-WC Document 35 Filed 05/22/2007 Page 1 of 3
2

OF COUNSEL: 

WEBSTER, HENRY, LYONS & WHITE, P.C. 

Post Office Box 239 

Montgomery, Alabama 36101-0239 

Telephone: (334) 264-9472 

Facsimile: (334) 264-9599 

PLAINTIFF DEMANDS A TRIAL BY JURY ON ALL COUNTS AND CLAIMS. 

______/s/ D. Mitchell Henry_______ 

OF COUNSEL 

Case 2:06-cv-00756-MHT-WC Document 35 Filed 05/22/2007 Page 2 of 3
3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that I have served a copy of the above and foregoing pleading on counsel 

as follows by ECF or by placing same in the U.S. Mail, properly addressed and first-class 

postage prepaid on this the 22nd day of May, 2007. 

Duke Groover, Esq. 

Groover & Childs 

165 1st Street 

Macon, Georgia 31201 

Jerry A. Buchanan 

Benjamin A. Land 

Buchanan & Land, LLP 

P. O. Box 2848 

Columbus, Georgia 31902 

Simeon F. Penton 

Kaufman & Rothfeder, P.C. 

P. O. Drawer 4540 

Montgomery, Alabama 36102 

__/s/ D. Mitchell Henry___ 

OF COUNSEL 

Case 2:06-cv-00756-MHT-WC Document 35 Filed 05/22/2007 Page 3 of 3
228 So.2d 313

#### STATE of Louisiana v. Henry P. HARRIS.

No. 50249.

Dec. 2, 1969.

In re: Henry P. Harris applying for writs of certiorari, prohibition, mandamus, and stay orders.

The application is denied — The showing made does not warrant the relief sought.

HAMLIN and SANDERS, JJ., are of the opinion that, because of the unusual circumstances in this case, applicant should be relieved as counsel.
§ 1040.131 Judicial review. Final DOE actions taken under this part to withhold or terminate Federal financial assistance are subject to judicial review under the following laws: ( a ) Title VI—Section 603 of the Civil Rights Act of 1964;
( b ) Title IX—Section 903 of the Education Amendments of 1972;
( c ) Section 16, Section 401, Section 504—Pub. L. 89-554, 5 U.S.C. 702;
( d ) Section 419 and Section 420 of the Energy Conservation and Production Act of 1976, as amended.