alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# SUBCHAPTER A - GENERAL

- PART 2400 [RESERVED] 
- PART 2401 - FEDERAL ACQUISITION REGULATION SYSTEM 
- PART 2402 - DEFINITIONS OF WORDS AND TERMS 
- PART 2403 - IMPROPER BUSINESS PRACTICES AND PERSONAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST 
- PART 2404 - ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS 

- PART 2400 [RESERVED]   
- PART 2401 - FEDERAL ACQUISITION REGULATION SYSTEM    - 2401.000   Scope of part.
  - Subpart 2401.1 - Purpose, Authority, Issuance     - 2401.100   Scope of subpart.
    - 2401.101   Purpose.
    - 2401.103   Authority.
    - 2401.104   Applicability.
    - 2401.105   Issuance.
    - 2401.105-2   Arrangement of regulations.
    - 2401.106   OMB approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act.
    - 2401.106-70   Contract clause.
  - Subpart 2401.3 - Agency Acquisition Regulations     - 2401.301   Policy.
    - 2401.302   Limitations.
  - Subpart 2401.4 - Deviations     - 2401.403   Individual deviations.
    - 2401.404   Class deviations.
    - 2401.470   Deviations from the HUDAR.
    - 2401.471   Requests for deviations - FAR and HUDAR.
  - Subpart 2401.6 - Career Development, Contracting Authority, and Responsibilities     - 2401.601   General.
    - 2401.601-70   Senior Procurement Executive.
    - 2401.602   Contracting Officers.
    - 2401.602-3   Ratification of unauthorized commitments.
    - 2401.603   Selection, appointment and termination of appointment.
    - 2401.603-2   Selection.
    - 2401.603-3   Appointment.
- PART 2402 - DEFINITIONS OF WORDS AND TERMS    - 2402.000   Scope of part.
  - Subpart 2402.1 - Definitions     - 2402.101   Definitions.
- PART 2403 - IMPROPER BUSINESS PRACTICES AND PERSONAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST    - Subpart 2403.1 - Safeguards     - 2403.101   Standards of conduct.
  - Subpart 2403.2 - Contractor Gratuities to Government Personnel     - 2403.203   Reporting procedures.
    - 2403.204   Treatment of violations.
  - Subpart 2403.3 - Reports of Suspected Antitrust Violations     - 2403.303-70   Reporting requirements.
  - Subpart 2403.4 - Contingent Fees     - 2403.405   Misrepresentations or violations of the Covenant Against Contingent Fees.
  - Subpart 2403.5 - Other Improper Business Practices     - 2403.502-70   Subcontractor kickbacks.
  - Subpart 2403.6 - Contracts With Government Employees or Organizations Owned or Controlled by Them     - 2403.602   Policy.
    - 2403.670   Solicitation provision and contract clause.
- PART 2404 - ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS    - Subpart 2404.7 - Contractor Records Retention     - 2404.7001   Contract clause.
  - Subpart 2404.8 - Government Contract Files     - 2404.805   Storage, handling and disposal of contract files.
837.7001 Solicitation provisions and contract clauses.       (a) The contracting officer shall insert the basic or the alternate of the provision at 852.237-76, Award to Single Offeror, in solicitations and contracts for mortuary services as follows:          (1) Insert the provision in all sealed bid solicitations for mortuary services; and          (2) Insert the basic provision with its alternate I in all negotiated solicitations for mortuary services.          (b) The contracting officer shall insert in addition to FAR 52.216-21, Requirements, the following VA clauses in all mortuary service solicitations and contracts:          (1) 852.237-77, Area of Performance.          (2) 852.237-78, Performance and Delivery.          (3) 852.237-79, Subcontracting.          (4) 852.237-80, Health Department and Transport Permits.          (c) See also 816.506-70 and 849.504-70 for additional clauses for use in contracts for mortuary services.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 837.70 - Mortuary Services
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

ANGELA DENISE NAILS, )

 )

Plaintiff, )

 )

v. ) CASE NO.1:06-cv-760-WKW

 )

CITY OF DOTHAN, )

 )

Defendant. )

ORDER

On September 18, 2006, the plaintiff filed a document entitled “Question,” which the

Court construes as a Motion for Reconsideration. (Doc. # 9.) Upon consideration of the

Motion for Reconsideration, it is hereby

ORDERED that the motion is DENIED.

DONE this 20th day of September, 2006.

 /s/ W. Keith Watkins 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00760-WKW-DRB Document 10 Filed 09/20/2006 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Company's consolidated balance sheet and consolidated statement of operations
and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such consolidated financial
statements together with the related footnotes thereto.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          43,994
<SECURITIES>                                    25,842
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,632
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     76,077
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               166,184
<PP&E>                                         165,550
<DEPRECIATION>                                  65,191
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 734,290
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           55,017
<BONDS>                                        775,750
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                   (116,254)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   734,290
<SALES>                                        180,912
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               180,912
<CGS>                                           95,997
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   95,997
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                32,028
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              58,228
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,494
<INCOME-TAX>                                       466
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,028
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,028
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
PART 28 – BONDS AND INSURANCE       SUBPART 28.1 – BONDS AND OTHER FINANCIAL PROTECTIONS                                                         28.106 Administration.                                                                           28.106-90 Review of bonds and consent of surety.                                                                                                                            SUBPART 28.3 – INSURANCE                                                         28.305 Overseas workers’ compensation and war–hazard insurance.                                                            28.307 Insurance under cost–reimbursement contracts.                                                                           28.307-1 Group insurance plans.    SUBPART 28.1 – BONDS AND OTHER FINANCIAL PROTECTIONS    *(Revised March 29, 2016 through PROCLTR 2016-06)* 28.106 Administration.     28.106-90 Review of bonds and consent of surety.    Contracting officers shall obtain legal sufficiency from Office of Counsel on all bonds and all consents of surety.SUBPART 28.3 – INSURANCE    *(Revised March 29, 2016 through PROCLTR 2016-06)* 28.305 Overseas workers’ compensation and war–hazard insurance.    (d) Instructions for waiver of Defense Base Act requirements can be accessed at Waivers for Defense Base Act (DBA) Insurance                       **(**                    https://www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/cpic/cp/waivers_for_defense_base_act_insurance.html                       **).**          Requests for waiver must be made in writing using Form BEC 565, Request for Waiver – Defense Base Act (https://www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/cpic/cp/docs/DBA_Waiver_Form.pdf). Prepare requests in accordance with DFARS PGI 228.305(d) in coordination with Office of Counsel. Submit request for waiver to the DLA Acquisition.Compliance, Policy and Pricing Division for signature by the DLA Acquisition Director. The DLA Acquisition Compliance, Policy and Pricing Division will submit the request to the Department of Labor.28.307 Insurance under cost–reimbursement contracts.     28.307-1 Group insurance plans.    (a) Submit insurance policies under the Defense Department Group Term Insurance Plan to the cognizant Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA) office for approval.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          49,070
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 1,466
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    344,873
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                      1,680,965
<ALLOWANCE>                                     19,432
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,173,519
<DEPOSITS>                                   1,643,486
<SHORT-TERM>                                   109,361
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             19,297
<LONG-TERM>                                    165,298
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        16,907
<OTHER-SE>                                     215,956
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               2,173,519
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                107,113
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               14,749
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   473
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               122,335
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              45,045
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              55,134
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           67,201
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    3,249
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               (622)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 44,287
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 30,746
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      30,746
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    21,599
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.28
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.27
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       0
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                     0
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                    0
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

BARBARA B. FREEMAN, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) Civil Action No.3:06CV794-SRW

) (WO)

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, )

Commissioner of Social Security, )

)

Defendant. )

JUDGMENT

In accordance with the Memorandum of Opinion entered on this date, it is 

ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that the decision of the Commissioner is

REVERSED and this action is REMANDED to the Commissioner for further proceedings

consistent with the Memorandum Opinion entered on this date.

Done, this 5th day of September, 2007.

/s/ Susan Russ Walker 

SUSAN RUSS WALKER

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-00794-SRW Document 16 Filed 09/05/07 Page 1 of 1
810.001-70 Market research policy - use of

VA Vendor Information Pages.

When performing market research, contracting officers shall review the Vendor Information Pages

(VIP) database at https://www.vetbiz.va.gov/vip/ as required by subpart 819.70. The contracting

officer will search the VIP database by applicable North American Industry Classification System

(NAICS) codes to determine whether two or more verified service-disabled veteran-owned small

businesses (SDVOSBs) and/or veteran-owned small businesses (VOSBs), with the appropriate NAICS

code, are listed as verified in the VIP database. The contracting officer will determine, among other

things as the requirement dictates, whether VIP-listed SDVOSBs or VOSBs identified as a result of

market research are capable of performing the work, are likely to submit an offer/quote, and

whether an award can be made at a fair and reasonable price that offers best value to the

Government. The contracting officer shall use the market research for acquisition planning

purposes, and as set forth in subpart 819.70, conduct a VA Rule of Two (see 802.101) determination

in accordance with the contracting order of priority (see 819.7005 and 819.7006).

Parent topic: PART 810 - MARKET RESEARCH
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

 NORTHERN DIVISION

 ______________________________

JAMES G. HUFFMAN *

Plaintiff, *

v. * 2:06-CV-748-MEF

SOUTHERN HEALTH SERVICES, et al., *

Defendants. *

 ______________________________

ORDER ON MOTION

Upon consideration of Plaintiff’s December 14, 2006 pleading, which the court

construes as a Motion for Service of Pleadings, and for good cause, it is 

ORDERED that the motion (Doc. No. 27) is GRANTED. Accordingly, it is further

ORDERED that on or before January 11, 2007 counsel for Defendants shall furnish

a copy of their answer and special report, including any and all exhibits and attachments, to

Plaintiff who is currently incarcerated at the Montgomery County Detention Facility, P.O.

Box 4599, Montgomery, Alabama 36103.

It is ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Extension of Time to file a response to

Defendants’ special reports (Doc. No. 28) be and is hereby GRANTED and Plaintiff is

GRANTED an extension from December 21, 2006 to January 31, 2007 to file his response

to Defendants’ special reports. 

Case 2:06-cv-00748-MEF-WC Document 29 Filed 01/05/2007 Page 1 of 2
Done, this 5th day of January 2007.

 /s/Wallace Capel, Jr. 

WALLACE CAPEL, JR.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00748-MEF-WC Document 29 Filed 01/05/2007 Page 2 of 2
[Cite as State v. Kearns, 2014-Ohio-5577.]

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO 

 SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT 

 CHAMPAIGN COUNTY 

STATE OF OHIO : 

: Appellate Case No. 2014-CA-12 

Plaintiff-Appellee : 

: Trial Court Case No. 13-CR-285 

v. : 

: 

JEANA M. KEARNS : (Criminal Appeal from 

: (Common Pleas Court) 

Defendant-Appellant : 

: 

. . . . . . . . . . . 

O P I N I O N

Rendered on the 19th day of December, 2014. 

. . . . . . . . . . . 

KEVIN S. TALEBI, Atty. Reg. #0069198, by WESLEY E. SOMOGY, Atty. Reg. #0089037, 

Champaign County Prosecutor’s Office, 200 North Main Street, Urbana, Ohio 43078 

Attorneys for Plaintiff-Appellee 

 

THEODORE D. VALLEY, Atty. Reg. #0070867, Baldwin Valley Law, LLC, 854 East 

Franklin Street, Centerville, Ohio 45459 

Attorney for Defendant-Appellant 

 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

 
2

HALL, J. 

{¶ 1} Jeana M. Kearns appeals from her conviction and sentence following a guilty 

plea to one count of cocaine possession, a fifth-degree felony. 

{¶ 2} In her sole assignment of error, Kearns contends the trial court abused its 

discretion in sentencing her to seven months in prison. She argues that the facts and 

circumstances warranted community control sanctions. 

{¶ 3} Upon review, we see nothing in the record indicating that Kearns moved for a 

stay of her sentence pending appeal, or that this court or the trial court granted a stay. To the 

contrary, the record reflects that Kearns was conveyed to prison in mid-March 2014. (See Doc. 

#43). Even without jail-time credit, which the trial court did not award, her seven-month 

prison term expired in mid-October 2014. We take judicial notice that she is not listed as an 

inmate on the Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction’s website which means that 

she has been released from prison and has not been placed on post-release control. See State v. 

Erdman, 2d Dist. Montgomery No. 25814, 2014-Ohio-2997, ¶ 3 (taking judicial notice that an 

appellant’s name did not appear on the website). 

{¶ 4} Where an appellant challenges only the imposition of a sentence that has been 

served, and not the underlying conviction, there is no meaningful relief this court can provide.

Id. at ¶ 4. Under such circumstances, the appeal is moot. Id. We find that to be the case here. 

Because Kearns has served the sentence she challenges, her appeal is dismissed as moot. 

 . . . . . . . . . . . . . 

FAIN, J., and DONOVAN, J., concur. 


3

Copies mailed to: 

Kevin S. Talebi 

Wesley E. Somogy 

Theodore D. Valley 

Hon. Nick A. Selvaggio
32.006 Reduction or suspension of contract

payments upon finding of fraud.

32.006-3 Responsibilities.

32.006-4 Procedures.

32.006-5 Reporting.

Parent topic: PART 32 – CONTRACT FINANCING
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markm an Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk December 26, 2012

t1217 

# Order

December 26, 2012

144660

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 144660

COA: 296677

Saginaw CC: 07

- 029814

- FC

ELRICK DELMAR COOPER,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 27, 2011

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
227 So.2d 374

#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Isaac PEART v. H. J. DEES, Acting Warden Louisiana State Penitentiary.

No. 50187.

Nov. 7, 1969.

In re: Isaac Peart applying for writ of habeas corpus and mandamus.

The application is denied. According to the return of the trial judge, the matter complained of is now moot.
§ 1040.6 Notice. ( a ) A recipient shall take appropriate, initial and continuing steps to notify participants, beneficiaries, applicants and employees, including those with impaired vision or hearing, and unions or professional organizations holding collective bargaining or professional agreements with the recipient that it does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex (where sec. 16 or sec. 401 apply), handicap, or age. The notification is to state, where appropriate, that the recipient does not discriminate in admission or access to, and treatment of, or employment in its programs or activities and inform employees of their rights under this part. The notification is to include an identification of the responsible employee designated under § 1040.5. A recipient shall make the initial notification required by this paragraph within 90 days of the effective date of this part. Methods of initial and continuing notification may include the posting of notices, publication in newspapers and magazines, placement of notices in recipients' publications, and distribution of memoranda or other written communications.
( b ) If a recipient publishes or uses recruitment materials or publications containing general information that it makes available to participants, beneficiaries, applicants, or employees, it shall include in those materials or publications a statement of the policy described in paragraph (a) of this section. A recipient may meet the requirement of this paragraph either by including appropriate inserts in existing materials and publications or by revising and reprinting the materials and publications.
( c ) The provisions of § 1040.5(c) to provide information in appropriate languages (including braille), apply to this section.
[45 FR 40515, June 13, 1980, as amended at 68 FR 51346, Aug. 26, 2003]
#### In re HAAP.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

November 11, 1914.)

In the matter of the judicial settlement the accounts of Haap, as under the will of George C. Maurer, deceased.

No opinion. "Decree affirmed, with costs.
§ 1015.206 Contracting with private collection contractors and with entities that locate and recover unclaimed assets. ( a ) DOE may contract with private collection contractors in accordance with 31 U.S.C. 3718(d), the DCIA, the revised Federal Claims Collection Standards (31 CFR parts 900-904) published November 22, 2000, and other applicable authorities.
( b ) As described in § 1015.201(e), under the DCIA, DOE is required to transfer all debts over 180 days delinquent to Treasury for purposes of debt collection (*i.e.,* cross-servicing) under 31 U.S.C. 3711(g). As part of its regular debt collection procedures, Treasury may refer delinquent debts to private collection contractors on behalf of DOE.
( c ) DOE may enter into contracts for locating and recovering assets of the United States, such as unclaimed assets. DOE must establish procedures acceptable to Treasury before entering into contracts to recover assets of the United States held by a state government or a financial institution.
( d ) DOE may enter into contracts for debtor asset and income search reports. In accordance with 31 U.S.C. 3718(d), such contracts may provide that the fee a contractor charges DOE for such services may be payable from the amounts recovered, unless otherwise prohibited by statute.