alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Promissory Note dated March 29, 2002



 Exhibit 10(v) 
 PROMISSORY NOTE 
  

			
	 $10,000,000
	 	March 29, 2002    
		 	Santa Ana, California

 For
value received, The First American Corporation, a California corporation (“Maker”), promises to pay to the order of First American Home Buyers Protection Corporation, a California corporation (“Payee”), at 7833 Haskell Avenue,
Van Nuys, California 91406, the principal sum of Ten Million Dollars ($10,000,000.00), and to pay interest on the balance of principal remaining from time-to-time outstanding and unpaid from April 1, 2002, until paid, at the rate of four and
seven eighths percent (4.875%) per annum. Principal and interest shall be paid in lawful money of the United States of America and in immediately available funds. 
 Said principal and interest shall be due and payable in equal quarterly installments in the amount of Two Hundred
Thirty-five Thousand Nine Hundred Thirty-five and Forty-two Hundredths Dollars ($235,935.42) commencing on the 1st
 day of July 2002, with quarterly payments continuing thereafter, until April 1, 2017, when the entire unpaid balance of principal, together with all accrued interest thereon remaining
unpaid, shall be due and payable in full. 
 Each payment made on this note shall be applied first to accrued interest, and the
balance thereof shall be applied to installments of principal then due or to become due hereunder in the order of their maturity. This note may be prepaid at any time or times in whole or in part, without notice or penalty. Prepayments of principal
shall be applied in the order of maturity. Principal that is prepaid shall cease to bear interest from the date of prepayment. 
 Should interest not be so paid, it shall thereafter bear like interest as the principal, but such unpaid interest so compounded shall not exceed an amount equal to simple interest on the unpaid








 
principal at the maximum rate permitted by law. Should default be made in the payment of any installment of interest or principal when due, all unpaid principal and accrued interest shall become
immediately due and payable at the option of the holder of this note. Should suit be commenced or an attorney be employed to enforce the payment of this note, Maker agrees to pay such additional sum as the court may adjudge reasonable as
attorneys’ fees in said suit. 
 This note is made under, and shall be construed and enforced in accordance with, the laws
of the State of California. 
  

			
	THE FIRST AMERICAN CORPORATION
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Parker S. Kennedy

		 	Parker S. Kennedy, President
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Mark R Arnesen

		 	Mark R Arnesen, Secretary
Case 3:06-cv-00740-MHT-SRW Document 15 Filed 10/10/2006 Page 1 of 4
Case 3:06-cv-00740-MHT-SRW Document 15 Filed 10/10/2006 Page 2 of 4
Case 3:06-cv-00740-MHT-SRW Document 15 Filed 10/10/2006 Page 3 of 4
Case 3:06-cv-00740-MHT-SRW Document 15 Filed 10/10/2006 Page 4 of 4
§ 1040.67 Reasonable accommodation. ( a ) A recipient shall make reasonable accommodation to the known physical or mental limitations of an otherwise qualified handicapped applicant or employee unless the recipient can demonstrate that the accommodation would impose an undue hardship on the operation of its program or activity.
( b ) Reasonable accommodation may include: ( 1 ) Making facilities used by employees readily accessible to and usable by handicapped persons; and
( 2 ) Job restructuring, part-time or modified work schedules, acquisition or modification of equipment or devices, the provision of readers or interpreters, and other similar actions.
( c ) In determining, under paragraph (a) of this section, whether an accommodation would impose an undue hardship on the operation of a recipient's program or activity, factors to be considered include: ( 1 ) The overall size of the recipient's program or activity with respect to number of employees, number and type of facilities, and size of budget;
( 2 ) The type of the recipient's operation, including the composition and structure of the recipient's workforce; and
( 3 ) The nature and cost of the accommodation needed.
( d ) A recipient may not deny any employment opportunity to a qualified handicapped employee or applicant if the basis for the denial is the need to make reasonable accommodation to the physical or mental limitations of the employee or applicant.
[45 FR 40515, June 13, 1980, as amended at 68 FR 51347, Aug. 26, 2003]
**EXHIBIT 32.2CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

       In connection with the quarterly reportof CNB Corporation on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2005 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Paul R.Dusenbury, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the CNBCorporation, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002that:
| 1. | The  above-listed Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)  or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                            |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|    |                                                                                                                                                                         |
| 2. | The  information contained in the above-listed Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all  material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the  Company. |
| Date:  November  9, 2005 | /s/Paul R.  Dusenbury            Paul R. Dusenbury  Executive Vice President and    Chief Financial Officer |
|------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                    |                                                                                                                                                                         |
# Subpart 822.4 [Reserved]

**Parent topic:**PART 822 - APPLICATION OF LABOR LAWS TO GOVERNMENT ACQUISITIONS
Subpart 2129.1 - General

Parent topic: PART 2129 - TAXES

2129.170 Policy.

(a) OPM shall consider taxes as a FEGLI Program cost under 2131.205-41.

(b) For purposes of the limited cost redetermination of a FEGLI Program contract, taxes are not

limited to those in effect as of the contract date, but shall include any taxes enacted, modified, or

repealed, by legislative, judicial, or administrative means, during the contract year.
950.7101 Applicability.       (a) The DOE also has general contract authority to enter into indemnity agreements with its contractors. Under such authority a certain measure of protection is extended to the DOE contractor against risk of liability, but the assumption of liability by DOE will be expressly subject to the availability of appropriated funds. Prior to enactment of section 170 of the Atomic Energy Act 1954, as amended, this authority was exercised in a number of Atomic Energy Commission contracts and this type of indemnification remains in some DOE contracts.          (b) It is the policy of the DOE, subsequent to the enactment of section 170, to restrict indemnity agreements with DOE contractors, with respect to protection against public liability for a nuclear incident, to the statutory indemnity provided under section 170. However, it is recognized that circumstances may exist under which a DOE contractor may be exposed to a risk of public liability for a nuclear occurrence which would not be covered by the statutory indemnity.          (c) While it is normally DOE policy to require its non-management and operating contractors to obtain insurance coverage against public liability for nonnuclear risks, there may be circumstances in which a contractual indemnity may be warranted to protect a DOE non-management and operating contractor against liability for uninsured nonnuclear risks.          (d) If circumstances as mentioned in paragraph (b) or (c) of this section do arise, it shall be the responsibility of the Heads of Contracting Activities to submit to the Head of the Agency or designee for review and decision, all pertinent information concerning the need for, or desirability of, providing a general authority indemnity to a DOE contractor.          (e) Where the indemnified risk is nonnuclear, the amount of general authority indemnity extended to a fixed-price contractor should normally have a maximum obligation equivalent to the amount of insurance that the contractor usually carries to cover such risks in its other commercial operations or, if the risk involved is dissimilar to those normally encountered by the contractor, the amount that it otherwise would have reasonably procured to insure this contract risk.          (f) In the event that a DOE contractor has been extended both a statutory indemnity and a general authority indemnity, the general authority indemnity will not apply to the extent that the statutory indemnity applies.          (g) The provisions of this subsection do not restrict or affect the policy of DOE to pay its cost-reimbursement type contractors for the allowable cost of losses and expenses incurred in the performance of the contact work, within the maximum amount of the contract obligation.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 950.71 - General Contract Authority Indemnity
January 23, 2014



### JUDGMENT


## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

MELVIN RICHARDSON , Appellant

NO. 14

- 13

- 01092

- CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

________________________________ This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. The record indicates that the appeal should be DISMISSED. The Court orders the appeal DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion.

We further order app ellant pay all costs expended in the appeal.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
#### DIEGUARDI, Appellant, v. NASSAU ELECTRIC R. CO., Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

July 31, 1914.)

Action by Francesco Dieguardi against the Nassau Electric Railroad Company.

No opinion. Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs.
###### Editorial Note on Part 26

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 26 appear at 87 FR 71455, Nov. 22, 2022.

#### § 26.81 Purpose and applicability.

This subpart contains requirements for collecting specimens for drug testing and conducting alcohol tests by or on behalf of the licensees and other entities in § 26.3(a) through (d) for the categories of individuals specified in § 26.4(a) through (d) and (g). At the discretion of a licensee or other entity in § 26.3(c), specimen collections and alcohol tests must be conducted either under this subpart for the individuals specified in § 26.4(e) and (f) or the licensee or other entity may rely on specimen collections and alcohol tests conducted under the requirements of 49 CFR Part 40 for the individuals specified in § 26.4(e) and (f). The requirements of this subpart do not apply to specimen collections and alcohol tests that are conducted under the requirements of 49 CFR Part 40, as permitted in this paragraph and under §§ 26.4(j) and 26.31(b)(2) and Subpart K.
157 So.2d 232.

#### J. Cecil PITTMAN v. The FIDELITY AND CASUALTY COMPANY OF NEW YORK et al.

No. 46971.

Nov. 12. 1963.

In re: J. Cecil Pittman applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of Tangipahoa. 156 So.2d 116.

Writ denied. No error of law under the facts founds by the Court of Appeal.
§ 110.41 Executive Branch review. ( a ) An application for a license to export the following will be promptly forwarded to the Executive Branch for review: ( 1 ) A production or utilization facility.
( 2 ) More than one effective kilogram of high-enriched uranium or 10 grams of plutonium or uranium-233.
( 3 ) Nuclear grade graphite for nuclear end use.
( 4 ) More than 3.7 TBq (100 Curies) of tritium;
( 5 ) Deuterium for nuclear end use, other than exports of deuterium to Canada;
( 6 ) One kilogram or more of source or special nuclear material to be exported under the US-IAEA Agreement for Cooperation.
( 7 ) An export involving assistance to end uses related to isotope separation, chemical reprocessing, heavy water production, advanced reactors, or the fabrication of nuclear fuel containing plutonium, except for exports of source material or low-enriched uranium to EURATOM, the United Kingdom, or Japan for enrichment up to 5 percent in the isotope uranium-235, and those categories of exports approved in advance by the Executive Branch as constituting permitted incidental assistance.
( 8 ) The initial export of nuclear material or equipment to a foreign reactor.
( 9 ) An export involving radioactive waste.
( 10 ) An export to any country listed in § 110.28 or § 110.29.
( 11 ) An export raising significant policy issues or subject to special limitations as determined by the Commission or the Executive Branch, including exports of radioactive material listed in Table 1 of appendix P to this part involving exceptional circumstances in § 110.42(e).
( b ) The Executive Branch will be requested to: ( 1 ) Provide its judgment as to whether the proposed export would be inimical to the common defense and security, along with supporting rationale and information.
( 2 ) Where applicable, confirm that the proposed export would be under the terms of an agreement for cooperation; and
( 3 ) Address the extent to which the export criteria in § 110.42 are met, if applicable, and the extent to which the recipient country or group of countries has adhered to the provisions of any applicable agreement for cooperation.
( c ) The Commission may request the Executive Branch to address specific concerns and provide additional data and recommendations as necessary.
[43 FR 21641, May 19, 1978, as amended at 49 FR 47200, Dec. 3, 1984; 58 FR 13004, Mar. 9, 1993; 60 FR 37564, July 21, 1995; 61 FR 35602, July 8, 1996; 70 FR 41939, July 21, 2005; 70 FR 37992, July 1, 2005; 70 FR 46066, Aug. 9, 2005; 75 FR 44090, July 28, 2010; 85 FR 86795, Dec. 31, 2020; 86 FR 55479, Oct. 6, 2021]
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 17

- 00181

- CR

THE STATE OF TEXAS

v. RAMIRO GARCIA LOPEZ JR.
On Appeal from the 430th District Court of Hidalgo County , Texas Trial Cause No. CR

- 2108

- 16

- J

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be reversed and the cause remanded to the trial court. The Court orders the judgment of the trial court REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings in accordance with its opinio n

. We further order this decision certified below for observance. October 11, 2018
SUBCHAPTER C—CONTRACTING METHODS

AND CONTRACT TYPES

PART 1213—SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION PROCEDURES

PART 1214 [RESERVED]

PART 1215—CONTRACTING BY NEGOTIATION

PART 1216—TYPES OF CONTRACTS

PART 1217—SPECIAL CONTRACTING METHODS

PART 1213—SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION PROCEDURES

Subpart 1213.70—Department of Transportation Procedures for Acquiring Training

Services

1213.7000 Applicability.

1213.7001 Solicitation provision and contract clause.

PART 1214 [RESERVED]

PART 1215—CONTRACTING BY NEGOTIATION

Subpart 1215.4—Contract Pricing

1215.404 Proposal analysis.

1215.404-470 Payment of profit or fee.

Subpart 1215.6—Unsolicited Proposals

1215.603 General.

1215.604 Agency points of contact.

1215.606 Agency procedures.

PART 1216—TYPES OF CONTRACTS

Subpart 1216.2—Fixed-Price Contracts

1216.203 Fixed-price contracts with economic price adjustment.

1216.203-4 Contract clauses.

1216.203-470 Solicitation provision.

Subpart 1216.4—Incentive Contracts

1216.406-70 DOT contract clauses.

Subpart 1216.5—Indefinite-Delivery Contracts

1216.505 Ordering.

Subpart 1216.6—Time-and-Materials, Labor-Hour, and Letter Contracts

1216.603 Letter contracts.

1216.603-4 Contract clauses.

PART 1217—SPECIAL CONTRACTING METHODS

Subpart 1217.70—Fixed-Price Contracts for Vessel Repair, Alteration, or Conversion

1217.7000 Definition.

1217.7001 Clauses.
# SUBCHAPTER G - CONTRACT MANAGEMENT

- PART 2442 - CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION AND AUDIT SERVICES 
- PART 2444 - SUBCONTRACTING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES 
- PART 2446 - QUALITY ASSURANCE 
- PART 2448 - VALUE ENGINEERING 
- PART 2449 - TERMINATION OF CONTRACTS 
- PART 2451 - USE OF GOVERNMENT SOURCES BY CONTRACTORS 

- PART 2442 - CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION AND AUDIT SERVICES    - Subpart 2442.3 - Contract Administration Office Functions     - 2442.302-70   Contract clause.
  - Subpart 2442.7 - Indirect Cost Rates     - 2442.705   Final indirect cost rates.
    - 2442.705-70   Contract clause.
  - Subpart 2442.11 - Production Surveillance and Reporting     - 2442.1107   Contract clause.
  - Subpart 2442.15 - Contractor Performance Information     - 2442.1502   Policy.
- PART 2444 - SUBCONTRACTING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES    - Subpart 2444.2 - Contract Clauses     - 2444.204   Contract clauses.
- PART 2446 - QUALITY ASSURANCE    - Subpart 2446.5 - Acceptance     - 2446.502   Responsibility for acceptance.
    - 2446.502-70   Contract clause.
  - Subpart 2446.7 - Warranties     - 2446.710   Contract clauses.
- PART 2448 - VALUE ENGINEERING     - 2448.102   Policies.
  - 2448.103   Processing value engineering change proposals.
  - 2448.104-3   Sharing collateral savings.
- PART 2449 - TERMINATION OF CONTRACTS    - Subpart 2449.1 - General Principles     - 2449.111   Review of proposed settlements.
- PART 2451 - USE OF GOVERNMENT SOURCES BY CONTRACTORS    - Subpart 2451.70 - Contractor Use of Government Discount Travel Rates     - 2451.7001   Contract clause.
COLLECTED BY
Accelovation Crawl
Accelovation
the site
§ 20.1601 Control of access to high radiation areas. ( a ) The licensee shall ensure that each entrance or access point to a high radiation area has one or more of the following features— ( 1 ) A control device that, upon entry into the area, causes the level of radiation to be reduced below that level at which an individual might receive a deep-dose equivalent of 0.1 rem (1 mSv) in 1 hour at 30 centimeters from the radiation source or from any surface that the radiation penetrates;
( 2 ) A control device that energizes a conspicuous visible or audible alarm signal so that the individual entering the high radiation area and the supervisor of the activity are made aware of the entry; or
( 3 ) Entryways that are locked, except during periods when access to the areas is required, with positive control over each individual entry.
( b ) In place of the controls required by paragraph (a) of this section for a high radiation area, the licensee may substitute continuous direct or electronic surveillance that is capable of preventing unauthorized entry.
( c ) A licensee may apply to the Commission for approval of alternative methods for controlling access to high radiation areas.
( d ) The licensee shall establish the controls required by paragraphs (a) and (c) of this section in a way that does not prevent individuals from leaving a high radiation area.
( e ) Control is not required for each entrance or access point to a room or other area that is a high radiation area solely because of the presence of radioactive materials prepared for transport and packaged and labeled in accordance with the regulations of the Department of Transportation provided that— ( 1 ) The packages do not remain in the area longer than 3 days; and
( 2 ) The dose rate at 1 meter from the external surface of any package does not exceed 0.01 rem (0.1 mSv) per hour.
( f ) Control of entrance or access to rooms or other areas in hospitals is not required solely because of the presence of patients containing radioactive material, provided that there are personnel in attendance who will take the necessary precautions to prevent the exposure of individuals to radiation or radioactive material in excess of the limits established in this part and to operate within the ALARA provisions of the licensee's radiation protection program.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2 Exhibit 32.2
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Intervoice, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for
the period ended May 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Craig E. Holmes, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), that:  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Exchange Act; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. This Certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act. Date: July 8, 2005
    
    /s/ Craig E. HolmesCraig E. HolmesExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
§ 205.390 Liability exemptions. ( a ) To the extent any action or omission taken by an entity that is necessary to comply with an emergency order issued pursuant to section 215A(b)(1) of the Federal Power Act and this Part, including any action or omission taken to voluntarily comply with such order, results in noncompliance with, or causes such entity not to comply with any rule, order, regulation, or provision of or under the Federal Power Act, including any reliability standard approved by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission pursuant to section 215 of the Federal Power Act, the Department will not consider such action or omission to be a violation of such rule, order, regulation, or provision.
( b ) The Department will treat an action or omission by an owner, operator, or user of critical electric infrastructure or of defense critical electric infrastructure to comply with an emergency order issued pursuant to section 215A(b)(1) of the Federal Power Act as the functional equivalent of an action or omission taken to comply with an order issued under section 202(c) of the Federal Power Act for purposes of section 202(c).
( c ) The liability exemptions specified in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section do not apply to an entity that, in the course of complying with an emergency order by taking an action or omission for which the entity would otherwise be liable, takes such action or omission in a grossly negligent manner.
Case 3:06-cr-00199-MEF-CSC Document 3 Filed 08/15/2006 Page 1 of 3
Case 3:06-cr-00199-MEF-CSC Document 3 Filed 08/15/2006 Page 2 of 3
Case 3:06-cr-00199-MEF-CSC Document 3 Filed 08/15/2006 Page 3 of 3
Case 3:06-cr-00195-MEF-CSC Document 4 Filed 01/25/2007 Page 1 of 1