alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1997
<CASH>                                      21,273,107
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               33,068,261
<ALLOWANCES>                                   340,696
<INVENTORY>                                 13,453,776
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            70,211,706
<PP&E>                                      42,333,140
<DEPRECIATION>                              10,774,287
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             106,424,666
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       19,847,278
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         9,673
<OTHER-SE>                                  84,872,421
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               106,424,666
<SALES>                                     24,742,283
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            24,742,283
<CGS>                                       11,414,879
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               24,514,094
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                90,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                416,712
<INCOME-TAX>                                   145,850
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            270,862
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   270,862
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.02
        

</TABLE>
Court of Appeals, State of Michigan 

ORDER 

David A Maples v State of Michigan 

Docket No. 343394 

LC No. 17-000135-MZ 

Brock A. Swartzle 

Presiding Judge 

Mark J. Cavanagh 

Thomas C. Cameron 

Judges 

The Court orders that the May 14, 2019 opinion is hereby AMENDED. The first full 

paragraph on page 5 at lines 13-14 states "Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Dictionary defines "leading" 

as "providing direction or guidance." That sentence is changed to state "Merriam-Webster's Collegiate 

Dictionary relevantly defines "leading" as "to bring to some conclusion .... " 

In all other respects, the May 14, 2019 opinion remains unchanged. 

A true copy entered and certified by Jerome W. Zimmer Jr., Chief Clerk, on 

NOV 2 2 2019 

Date
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of First Community Financial Corporation, (the Company for
the period ended June 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, James R. McLaughlin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of the
operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.



|                      |  |     |  |                                     
|--------------------- |  | --- |  | ------------------------------------
|Date: August 12, 2004 |  | By: |  | /s/ James R. McLaughlin             
|                      |  |     |  | James R. McLaughlin, President & CEO
#### § 985.157 Reserve pool requirements.

Pursuant to § 985.57(a), on December 1, the Committee shall pool identified excess oil as reserve oil in such manner as to accurately account for its receipt, storage, and disposition.

[78 FR 9577, Feb. 11, 2013]
§ 205.323 Transferability. ( a ) Neither a permit issued by the ERA pursuant to Executive Order 10485, as amended, nor the facility shall be transferable or assignable. Provided written notice is given to the ERA within 30 days, the authorization may continue in effect temporarily in the event of the involuntary transfer of the facility by operation of law (including transfers to receivers, trustees, or purchases under foreclosure or judicial sale). This continuance is contingent on the filing of an application for a new permit and may be effective until a decision is made thereon.
( b ) In the event of a proposed voluntary transfer of the facility, the permittee and the party to whom the transfer would be made shall file a joint application with the ERA pursuant to this paragraph, setting forth information as required by § 205.320 *et seq.,* together with a statement of reasons for the transfer. The application shall be accompanied by a filing fee pursuant to § 205.326.
( c ) No substantial change shall be made in any facility authorized by permit or in the operation thereof unless or until such change has been approved by the ERA.
( d ) Permits may be modified or revoked without notice by the President of the United States, or by the Administrator of the ERA after public notice.
§ 1044.04 What is a protected disclosure? A protected disclosure is: ( a ) A disclosure of classified or unclassified controlled nuclear information that you reasonably believe provides direct and specific evidence of— ( 1 ) A violation of law or Federal regulation;
( 2 ) Gross mismanagement, a gross waste of funds, or an abuse of authority; or
( 3 ) A false statement to Congress on pursuant to an issue of material fact; and
( b ) Protected pursuant to the procedures in this part, including the security procedures referenced in § 1044.11; and
( c ) Revealed only to a person or organization described in § 1044.06.
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I,Eddie Canterbury, Chief Executive Officer, certify that: 

 

1.          I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Logan CountyBancShares, Inc.;

 

2.          Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.          Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.          The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a)          Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b)         Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(c)          Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.          The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

 

(a)          All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b)         Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.

 
| Date:  August 18, 2004 | /s/  Eddie Canterbury    |   |
|-----------------------------|--------------------------|--------|
|                        | Eddie  Canterbury        |
|                        | Chief  Executive Officer |

 

1

----
#### § 983.24 Producer.

*Producer* means any person engaged within the production area in a proprietary capacity in the production of pistachios for sale.

[69 FR 17850, Apr. 4, 2004. Redesignated at 74 FR 56539, Nov. 2, 2009]
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRCT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

VS. CASE NUMBER: 3:06CR205-MEF

HENRY ERIK YAPIAS,

Defendant.

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

COMES now, SYDNEY ALBERT SMITH, CJA Panel Attorney, and files herein his notice

of appearance as appointed counsel for the Defendant, HENRY ERIK YAPIAS, in the above styled

cause. 

Respectfully submitted this the 21st day of November, 2006.

S/Sydney Albert Smith

Sydney Albert Smith

ASB-3560-H70S

Attoney at Law

P. O. Drawer 389

Elba, AL 36323

Phone: 334-897-3658 

Fax: 334-897-3658

sydneyalbertsmith@charter.net

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that I have servede a copy of the foregoing with the Clerk of the Court using

the CM/ECF sydtem which will send notifications of such filing to the following:

Chris Snyder, Assistant Unites States Attorney

Jennifer A. Hart, Federal Defenders Middle District of Alabama.

S/Sydney Albert Smith

Sydney Albert Smith

ASB-3560-H70S

Attoney at Law

P. O. Drawer 389

Case 3:06-cr-00204-MEF-CSC Document 18 Filed 11/21/2006 Page 1 of 2
Elba, AL 36323

Phone: 334-897-3658 

Fax: 334-897-3658

sydneyalbertsmith@charter.net

Case 3:06-cr-00204-MEF-CSC Document 18 Filed 11/21/2006 Page 2 of 2
#### § 12.309 Judicial review.

Judicial review of final agency decisions on awards may be sought as provided in 5 U.S.C. 504(c)(2).
Editorial Note on Part 30
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 30 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

§ 30.53 Tests. Each licensee shall perform, or permit the Commission to perform, such tests as the Commission deems appropriate or necessary for the administration of the regulations in this part and parts 31 through 36 and 39 of this chapter, including tests of: ( a ) Byproduct material;
( b ) Facilities wherein byproduct material is utilized or stored;
( c ) Radiation detection and monitoring instruments; and
( d ) Other equipment and devices used in connection with the utilization or storage of byproduct material.
[30 FR 8185, June 26, 1965, as amended at 43 FR 6922, Feb. 17, 1978; 52 FR 8241, Mar. 17, 1987; 58 FR 7736, Feb. 9, 1993]
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION

DONNA DORSEY DAVIS, etc., )

)

Plaintiff, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

v. ) 2:06cv766-MHT

) 

RICHARD M. DORSEY, etc., )

and CD&O, L.L.C., etc., )

)

Defendants. )

ORDER

The defendants having orally informed the court that

they do not object, it is ORDERED that plaintiff Donna

Dorsey Davis’s motion to dismiss (doc. no. 50) is granted

and defendant CD & O, LLC is dismissed.

DONE, this the 19th day of June, 2007.

 /s/ Myron H. Thompson 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00766-MHT-TFM Document 52 Filed 06/19/2007 Page 1 of 1
Case 3:06-cr-00210-MEF-CSC Document 1 Filed 08/15/2006 Page 1 of 2
Case 3:06-cr-00210-MEF-CSC Document 1 Filed 08/15/2006 Page 2 of 2
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                      Washington, D.C.  20549

                            FORM 10-Q\A

(Mark One)

   X QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
     SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED
     MARCH 31, 1999
                                OR
     TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
     SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM
     _____ TO _____

                    Commission File No. 0-14147

                    QUESTAR PIPELINE COMPANY
      (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


     STATE OF UTAH                                     87-0307414
(State or other jurisdiction of                  (I.R.S. Employer
 incorporation or organization)               Identification No.)


P.O. Box 45360, 180 East 100 South, Salt Lake City, Utah 84145-0360
(Address of principal executive offices)               (Zip Code)


Registrant's telephone number, including area code:(801) 324-2400

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all
reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such
shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports),
and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90
days.

                      Yes   X       No

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's
classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

                Class            Outstanding as of April 30, 1999
Common Stock, $1.00 par value                  6,550,843 shares

Registrant meets the conditions set forth in General Instruction
H(a)(1) and (b) of Form 10-Q and is filing this Form 10-Q with the
reduced disclosure format.


                              PART II
                         OTHER INFORMATION

Item 6.  Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K.

     (a)  The following corrected exhibit has been filed as part of
this report:

     Exhibit No.    Exhibit

        12.      Ratio of earnings to fixed charges.



SIGNATURES

     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its
behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


                                   QUESTAR PIPELINE COMPANY
                                              (Registrant)



June 3, 1999                       /s/ D. N. Rose
                                   D. N. Rose
                                   President and Chief Executive Officer



June 3, 1999                       /s/ S. E. Parks
                                   S. E. Parks
                                   Vice President, Treasurer, and
                                   Chief Financial Officer
# Subpart 2907.1 - Acquisition Plans

**Parent topic:**PART 2907 - ACQUISITION PLANNING

## 2907.105 Contents of written acquisition plans.

The Department of Labor has implemented its acquisition planning system in compliance with FAR 7.1 and internal procedures provided in DLMS 2 section 834. The annual forecast is available for review from: *http://www.apps.dol.gov/contract_grant/index.htm.*

## 2907.107 Additional requirements for acquisitions involving bundling.

The FAR requirements for justification, review, and approval of bundling of contract requirements also apply to an order from a Federal Supply Schedule contract, Governmentwide acquisition contracts, or other indefinite-delivery contracts if the requirements consolidated under the order meet the definition of “bundling” at FAR 2.101.
1836.7004 NASA solicitation provision and

contract clause.

The contracting officer may insert a clause substantially the same as stated at 1852.236–75,

Partnering for Construction Contracts, in solicitations and contracts for construction, when it has

been determined that the benefits to be derived from partnering exceed the costs.

Parent topic: Subpart 1836.70—Partnering
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

JOHN STEPHEN COLEMAN, #223809, )

)

 Petitioner, )

)

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:06-CV-669-MEF

)

GWENDOLYN MOSLEY, et al., )

)

 Respondents. )

ORDER ON MOTION

Upon consideration of the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by

the petitioner (Court Doc. No. 2), and for good cause, it is

ORDERED that this motion be and is hereby GRANTED. 

Done, this 28th day of July, 2006.

/s/ Susan Russ Walker 

SUSAN RUSS WALKER

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00669-MEF-SRW Document 4 Filed 07/28/2006 Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3574 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3574

 To suspend temporarily the duty on certain men's footwear valued over 
          $20 a pair with coated or laminated textile fabrics.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 27, 2006

  Mr. Carper introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To suspend temporarily the duty on certain men's footwear valued over 
          $20 a pair with coated or laminated textile fabrics.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTAIN MEN'S FOOTWEAR VALUED OVER $20 A PAIR WITH COATED OR 
              LAMINATED TEXTILE FABRICS.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.64.06      Men's footwear,     Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         except vulcanized                                                  31/2009
                         footwear and
                         footwear with
                         waterproof molded
                         bottoms,
                         including bottoms
                         comprising an
                         outer sole and
                         all or part of
                         the upper, valued
                         over $20/pair,
                         designed to be
                         worn in lieu of,
                         but not over,
                         other footwear as
                         a protection
                         against water,
                         oil, grease or
                         chemicals or cold
                         or inclement
                         weather where
                         such protection
                         includes
                         protection
                         against water
                         that is imparted
                         by the use of a
                         coated or
                         laminated textile
                         fabric (provided
                         in subheading
                         6402.99.20)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of Kindred Biosciences, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certifies that, to his knowledge:


(i)    The annual report on Form 10-K/A of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and


(ii)    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











Date:  April 24, 2014By:/s/ Stephen S. GallikerName:   Stephen S. GallikerTitle:   Chief Financial Officer
#### Vivian Gabor, an Infant, by Robert Gabor, Her Parent et al., Respondents-Appellants, v. Steven J. Levitt et al., Appellants, and Maxine Stern et al., Respondents.

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, medical expenses and loss of services, (1) defendants Levitt appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered April 25, 1969, in favor of plaintiffs against them and in favor of defendants Stem against plaintiff Robert Gabor, upon a jury verdict, and (2) plaintiffs appeal from that portion of the judgment that is in favor of defendants Stem. Judgment reversed, on the law, and new trial granted as to all defendants, with costs to abide the event. This court has considered the questions of fact and has determined that it would not grant a new trial upon those questions. The personal injuries were received by the infant plaintiff, a passenger in a motor vehicle owned by defendant Aaron Stern and operated by defendant Maxine Stern which made a left-hand turn at an intersection and was struck by the corporate defendant Levitt’s motor vehicle, operated by defendant Steven J. Levitt. Mrs. Stern testified she signaled to make the turn, saw no oncoming traffic, turned, and in an instant was struck by the Levitt vehicle. Mr. Levitt testified that the Stern vehicle darted out in front of his vehicle when he was 10 feet from the intersection and that the Stern car then stopped in his lane. The record demonstrates that the jury could find that Levitt was confronted with an emergency situation at the time of the accident. Under these circumstances, he was entitled to a charge that, if the jury believed he was faced with an emergency which he did not create, he is not to be held liable for failing to exercise the best judgment in the emergency *(Bobbe*v. *Camato,*26 A D 2d 627). In view of the closeness of this case and the fact that the jury specifically requested guidance on this issue, we feel it was prejudicial error for the trial court to refuse to charge on the subject of emergency situation. Christ, Acting P. J., Rabin, Munder, Martuscello and Benjamin, JJ., concur.
§ 215.5 Pricing and volume reports. To the extent not reported pursuant to § 215.3, any person lifting for export crude oil from a country shall report to the DOE within 30 days of the date on which he receives actual notice: ( a ) Any change (including changes in the timing of collection) by the host government in official selling prices, royalties, host government taxes, service fees, quality or port differentials, or any other payments made directly or indirectly for crude oil; changes in participation ratios; changes in concessionary arrangements; and
( b ) Any changes in restrictions on lifting, production, or disposition.