alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
MANAGEMENT'S
ASSERTION OF COMPLIANCE
  Management
of the Agency and Trust division of Citibank, N.A. (or "Company") is
responsible for assessing compliance 
with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB
promulgated by the Securities and Exchange 
Commission. 
Management has determined that the servicing criteria set forth in Item
1122(d) of Regulation AB are applicable in regard 
to the servicing platform as of and for the period as follows:
 Platform:
Publicly-issued (i.e., transaction-level reporting
initially required under the Securities Exchange Act of 
1934, as amended) and certain privately-issued (i.e.,
for which transaction-level reporting is required pursuant to 
contractual obligation) commercial mortgage-backed securities issued on
or after January 1, 2011,as listed in 
Appendix A, for which the Company provides the following servicing
functions (the "Platform"):
  -
paying
agent, certificate administration and trustee; or 
- certificate
administration and paying agent
 Applicable
Servicing Criteria: All servicing criteria set forth in Item
1122(d), to the extent required by Item 
1122(d) servicing criteria in regards to the activities performed by
the Company with respect to the Platform as to 
any transaction, except for the following servicing criteria:
1122(d)(1)(iii), 1122(d)(4)(i)-1122(d)(4)(ii) and 
1122(d)(4)(iv)-1122(d)(4)(xv), which management has determined are not
applicable to the activities the 
Company performs with respect to the Platform (the "Applicable
Servicing Criteria"). With respect to criteria 
1122(d)(2)(iii) and 1122(d)(4)(iii), there were no activities performed
during the twelve months ended December 
31, 2013 with respect to the Platform, because there were no
occurrences of events that would require the 
Company to perform such activities. Period:
Twelve months ended December 31, 2013 (the "Period").
 With
respect to the Platform as of and for the Period, the Company's
management provides the following assertion of 
compliance with respect to the Applicable Servicing Criteria:
  - The
Company's management is responsible for assessing the Company's
compliance with the Applicable 
Servicing Criteria. 
- The
Company's management has assessed compliance with the Applicable
Servicing Criteria. In making this 
assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Securities
and Exchange Commission in paragraph 
(d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB. 
- Based
on such assessment, the Company has complied, in all material respects,
with the Applicable Servicing 
Criteria.
 KPMG
LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an
attestation report with respect to 
management's assertion of compliance with the Applicable Servicing
Criteria as of and for the Period.
 CITIBANK,
N.A. 
By: /s/ Karen Montbach
Its: Managing Director
 Dated:
February 28, 2014


Appendix
A
  Mortgage-backed
Transactions and Securities Constituting the Platform
 DEAL NAMECCMT 2013-375P 
CCMT 2012-GC8 
CCMT 2013-GCJ11 
CCMT 2013-GC15 
CCMT 2013-GC17 
CFCRE 2011-C2 
GSMC 2011-GC3 
GSMST-2011-GC5
§ 13.17 Rights of parties. Except as otherwise limited by this part, all parties may— ( a ) Be accompanied, represented, and advised by a representative;
( b ) Participate in any conference held by the ALJ;
( c ) Conduct discovery;
( d ) Agree to stipulation of fact or law, which shall be made part of the record;
( e ) Present evidence relevant to the issues at the hearing;
( f ) Present and cross-examine witnesses;
( g ) Present oral arguments at the hearing as permitted by the ALJ; and
( h ) Submit written briefs and proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law after the hearing.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

 )

 v. ) CR. NO. 3:06-cr-208-MEF

 ) 

JASON EDWARD COFIELD ) 

UNITED STATES’ NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF ADDITIONAL COUNSEL

Comes now the United States of America, by and through Leura Garrett Canary, United

States Attorney for the Middle District of Alabama, and hereby notices the appearance of Assistant

United States Attorney Matthew W. Shepherd, who will be serving as additional counsel of record

for the United States in this matter. 

 Respectfully submitted this the 7th of March, 2007.

LEURA G. CANARY

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

/s/ Matthew W. Shepherd

MATTHEW W. SHEPHERD

Assistant United States Attorney

One Court Square, Suite 201

Montgomery, Alabama 36104

Telephone: (334) 223-7280

Fax: (334) 223-7135

Case 3:06-cr-00208-MEF-CSC Document 48 Filed 03/07/2007 Page 1 of 2
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

 )

 v. ) CR. NO. 3:06-cr-208-MEF

 ) 

JASON EDWARD COFIELD ) 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on March 7, 2007, I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of

the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing to all attorneys of

record.

Respectfully submitted,

 

LEURA G. CANARY

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

/s/ Matthew W. Shepherd

MATTHEW W. SHEPHERD

Assistant United States Attorney

One Court Square, Suite 201

Montgomery, Alabama 36104

Telephone: (334) 223-7280

Fax: (334) 223-7135

Case 3:06-cr-00208-MEF-CSC Document 48 Filed 03/07/2007 Page 2 of 2
# Subpart 1445.3 - Authorizing the Use and Rental of Government Property

**Parent topic:**PART 1445 - GOVERNMENT PROPERTY

## 1445.302 Contracts with foreign governments or international organizations.

The HCA, after coordinating with the cognizant PMO, shall establish procedures to recover use costs when foreign governments or international organizations request use of Government production and research property
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>6
<LEGEND> THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE FORM 10-Q AS OF JUNE 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
<MULTIPLIER>1
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                  JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       6-MOS
<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST>           6,421,516
<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE>          5,078,279
<RECEIVABLES>                           0
<ASSETS-OTHER>                     61,178
<OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS>              340,018
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  5,479,475
<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES>                0
<SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT>                 0
<OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES>          90,406
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES>                90,406
<SENIOR-EQUITY>                         0
<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON>        6,732,306
<SHARES-COMMON-STOCK>             150,570
<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR>             150,570
<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT>               0
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII>                  0
<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS>                 0
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS>                0
<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC>       (1,343,237)
<NET-ASSETS>                    5,389,069
<DIVIDEND-INCOME>                       0
<INTEREST-INCOME>                     373
<OTHER-INCOME>                          0
<EXPENSES-NET>                    372,274
<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME>          (371,901)
<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT>                0
<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT>         (42,850)
<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS>            (414,751)
<EQUALIZATION>                          0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME>               0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS>                0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER>                   0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD>                 0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED>             0
<SHARES-REINVESTED>                     0
<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS>           (414,751)
<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR>                 0
<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR>               0
<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR>                 0
<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR>              0
<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES>              57,168
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      0
<GROSS-EXPENSE>                   372,274
<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS>            5,596,444
<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN>                  48
<PER-SHARE-NII>                        (2)
<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC>                 0 <F1>
<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND>                    0
<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS>               0
<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL>                    0
<PER-SHARE-NAV-END>                    46
<EXPENSE-RATIO>                      6.65
[AVG-DEBT-OUTSTANDING]                  0
[AVG-DEBT-PER-SHARE]                    0
<FN>
<F1>
A zero value is used since the change in net unrealized fair value is not
allocated to General Partners and Limited Partners as it is not taxable.
</FN>

</TABLE>
2105.7001 Applicability.       FAR part 5 has no practical application to the FEGLI Program because the requirements for eligible contractors (i.e., qualified life insurance companies) are stated in 5 U.S.C. 8709.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 2105.70 - Applicability
###### Editorial Note on Part 26

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 26 appear at 87 FR 71455, Nov. 22, 2022.

#### § 26.1 Purpose.

This part prescribes requirements and standards for the establishment, implementation, and maintenance of fitness-for-duty (FFD) programs.
'' 'I 

I! i- ~.r ) 

OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER 

Mr. Dennis J. DeVany 

Chief, Essential Air Service Division 

Office of Aviation Analysis 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

February 13, 2012 

RE: Docket DOT-OST-1998-4574 and OST-1998-3546 

Dear Mr. DeVany: 

SEAN PARNELL, GOVERNOR 

41111 AVIATION A VENUE 

PO Box 196900 

ANCHORAGE, ALASKA 99519-6900 

FAX: (907) 269-0730 

PHONE: (907) 269-0489 

This letter is to express support for the continuation of the Essential Air Service (EAS) program 

in Alaska and the crucial connection it brings to our remote communities. 

Due to the isolated location of these communities and the complete lack of any road system 

connection, this subsidized air service is their only form of scheduled transportation. The 

communities ofChisanaand Healx; Lakddepends on scheduled air freight, passenger and mail 

service for basic necessities, routine medical and health services, and economic welfare. 

The State of Alaska continues to assert that the local residents are best positioned to comment on 

particular schedules or air carriers and therefore we leave those specific areas for the community 

to comment on. 

I respectfully urge USDOT to support and continue the EAS service at Chisana and Healy Lake 

and support the carrier selection that applied to provide this service. 

Sincerely, 

,.· I 

Steven D. Hatter 

Deputy Commissioner - Aviation 

cc: Marc Luiken, Commissioner, DOT &PF
IV 

House Calendar No. 53 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 331 

[Report No. 109–141] 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 2475) to authorize appropriations 

for fiscal year 2006 for intelligence and intelligence-related activities 

of the United States Government, the Community Management Account, 

and the Central Intelligence Agency Retirement and Disability System, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 20, 2005 

Mr. PUTNAM, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; 

which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 2475) to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2006 for intelligence 

and intelligence-related activities of the United States 

Government, the Community Management Account, and 

the Central Intelligence Agency Retirement and Disability System, and for other purposes. 

1 Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution 

2 it shall be in order without intervention of any point of 

3 order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 2475) to 
2 

HRES 331 RH 

1 authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2006 for intel2 ligence and intelligence-related activities of the United 

3 States Government, the Community Management Ac4 count, and the Central Intelligence Agency Retirement 

5 and Disability System, and for other purposes. The bill 

6 shall be considered as read. The amendment in the nature 

7 of a substitute recommended by the Permanent Select 

8 Committee on Intelligence now printed in the bill, modified 

9 by the amendment printed in part A of the report of the 

10 Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution, shall 

11 be considered as adopted. The previous question shall be 

12 considered as ordered on the bill, as amended, and on any 

13 further amendment thereto to final passage without inter14 vening motion except: (1) one hour of debate on the bill, 

15 as amended, equally divided and controlled by the chair16 man and ranking minority member of the Permanent Se17 lect Committee on Intelligence; (2) the further amendment 

18 printed in part B of the report of the Committee on Rules, 

19 if offered by Representative Maloney of New York or her 

20 designee, which shall be in order without intervention of 

21 any point of order or demand for division of the question, 

22 shall be considered as read, and shall be separately debat23 able for 30 minutes equally divided and controlled by the 

24 proponent and an opponent; and (3) one motion to recom25 mit with or without instructions. 

House Calendar No. 53 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 331 

[Report No. 109–141] 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 2475) 

tem, and for other purposes. ligence Agency Retirement and Disability Sysnity Management Account, and the Central Intelof the United States Government, the Commufor intelligence and intelligence-related activities to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2006 

JUNE 20, 2005 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed
*

 Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-60378 

Summary Calendar

__________________

LUTHER COLEMAN,

 Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

EDWARD HARGETT,

 Respondent-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 2:91-CV-093-D

- - - - - - - - - -

February 21, 1996

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DUHE’ and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Luther Coleman appeals from the district court's dismissal of his petition for writ of habeas

corpus, 28 U.S.C. § 2254. He argues that he was denied an impartial jury because a high

percentage of the venire consisted of law enforcement personnel or their relatives, that the state

court failed to exclude inculpatory statements made by Coleman without a 

knowing and intelligent waiver of his Miranda rights, that the state court improperly admitted

evidence absent proof of the chain of custody, and that his conviction should be reversed because

of cumulative error.

We have reviewed the arguments and the record and perceive no reversible error. 

Because there is no error, we reject Coleman's cumulative error argument. We affirm the district

court's dismissal of Coleman's petition for essentially the reasons stated by the district court.
No. 95-60378

-2-

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32.1



Citizens Financial Corp.



Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley

Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350



I,
Robert J. Schoonover, President and Chief Executive Officer of Citizens Financial Corp. (the company) certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 that:



|1. | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the company for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





|      |  |          |  |                         
|----- |  | -------- |  | ------------------------
|Date: |  | 11/10/04 |  |                         
|      |  |         
|      |  |          |  | /s/ Robert J. Schoonover
|      |  |          |  | Robert J. Schoonover    
|      |  |          |  | President               
|      |  |          |  | Chief Executive Officer 



30
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-19-00228-CR

DEZNIK QUINSEAN PORTIS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

§

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from Criminal District 

Court No. 2

of Tarrant County (1522473D)

December 19, 2019

Opinion by Justice Bassel

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there 

was error in the trial court’s judgment. The judgment is modified to delete the $400 

unpronounced fine, and we modify the incorporated order to withdraw funds to 

reduce the authorized withdrawal amount by $400. It is ordered that the judgment of 

the trial court is affirmed as modified.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Dabney Bassel

 Justice Dabney Bassel
Electronically FiledIntermediate Court of AppealsCAAP-16-000047109-MAR-201808:12 AM
### Attachment G

G - 1 

## Final List of Chemicals for Initial Tier 1 Screening in the EDSP April 3, 2009

IMPORTANT NOTE: This list should not be construed as a list of known or likely endocrine disruptors. Nothing in the approach for generating the initial list provides a basis to infer that by simply being on this lis t these chemicals are suspected to interfere with the endocrine systems of humans or other s pecies, and it would be inappropriate to do so. As required by FFDCA §408(p), all pesticides will be screened under the EDSP.

Chemical Name CAS Number Pesticide Active Ingredient HPV/ Inert

2,4-D 94757 x 4,7–Methano–1H–isoindole–1,3( 2H)–dione, 2–(2–ethylhexyl)– 3a,4,7,7a–tetrahydro– 113484 x
Abamectin 71751412 x Acephate 30560191 x Acetone 67641 x
Atrazine 1912249 x Benfluralin 1861401 x
Bifenthrin 82657043 x Butyl benzyl phthalate 85687 x Captan 133062 x Carbamothioic acid, dipropyl–, S–ethyl ester 759944 x Carbaryl 63252 x Carbofuran 1563662 x
Chlorothalonil 1897456 x Chlorpyrifos 2921882 x Cyfluthrin 68359375 x Cypermethrin 52315078 x DCPA (or chlorthal–dimethyl) 1861321 x Diazinon 333415 x Dibutyl phthalate 84742 x Dichlobenil 1194656 x
Dicofol 115322 x Diethyl phthalate 84662 x
Dimethoate 60515 x Dimethyl phthalate 131113 x Di–sec–octyl phthalate 117817 x Disulfoton 298044 x
Endosulfan 115297 x Esfenvalerate 66230044 x Ethoprop 13194484 x Fenbutatin oxide 13356086 x
Flutolanil 66332965 xG -2 Chemical Name CAS Number Pesticide Active Ingredient HPV/ Inert
Folpet 133073 x Gardona (cis–isomer) 22248799 x Glyphosate 1071836 x Imidacloprid 138261413 x Iprodione 36734197 x Isophorone 78591 x Linuron 330552 x
Malathion 121755 x Metalaxyl 57837191 x Methamidophos 10265926 x Methidathion 950378 x Methomyl 16752775 x Methyl ethyl ketone 78933 x Methyl parathion 298000 x Metolachlor 51218452 x
Metribuzin 21087649 x Myclobutanil 88671890 x
Norflurazon 27314132 x o–Phenylphenol 90437 x Oxamyl 23135220 x Permethrin 52645531 x
Phosmet 732116 x Piperonyl butoxide 51036 x Propachlor 1918167 x Propargite 2312358 x Propiconazole 60207901 x Propyzamide 23950585 x Pyridine, 2-(1-methyl-2- (4-phenoxyphenoxy)ethoxy) 95737681 x Quintozene 82688 x
Resmethrin 10453868 x Simazine 122349 x
Tebuconazole 107534963 x Toluene 108883 x
Triadimefon 43121433 x Trifluralin 1582098 x
Totals: 58 9
2831.205-6 Compensation for personal

services.

The HCA or designee is the agency head for the purposes FAR 31.205-6(g)(6).

Parent topic: Subpart 2831.2 - Contracts With Commercial Organizations
120 STAT. 1742 PUBLIC LAW 109–316—OCT. 10, 2006

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 6159:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 152 (2006):

Sept. 26, considered and passed House.

Sept. 29, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 109–316

109th Congress

An Act

To extend temporarily certain authorities of the Small Business Administration.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TEMPORARY EXTENSION.

Any program, authority, or provision, including any pilot program, authorized under the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 631

et seq.) or the Small Business Investment Act of 1958 (15 U.S.C.

661 et seq.) as of September 30, 2006, that is scheduled to expire

on or after September 30, 2006 and before February 2, 2007, shall

remain authorized through February 2, 2007, under the same terms

and conditions in effect on September 30, 2006.

Approved October 10, 2006.

Oct. 10, 2006

[H.R. 6159]
##### 



Exhibit 10.1
 EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
between
INTEGRA BANK CORPORATION
and
BRADLEY M. STEVENS
  Recitals
    Agreement
  Effective Date.
 Term of Employment. rd




---



##### 



Position and Responsibilities.
 Standard of Care.
 Compensation and Benefits.
 Annual Base Salary
 Incentive Bonus.
 Equity Compensation.
  -2-




---



##### 



Employee Benefits.
 Automobile Lease.
 Country Club Membership.
 Reimbursement of Business Expenses.
 Termination of Employment.
 Termination Due to Death.
 Termination Due to Disability.
  -3-




---



##### 



Termination by the Company Without Cause.
 Termination by the Company For Cause.
  -4-




---



##### 



Termination by the Company in Connection with a Change in Control
  -5-




---



##### 



.
 Termination by Executive For Good Reason
      -6-




---



##### 



-7-




---



##### 



;
  -8-




---



##### 



Termination By Executive Without Good Reason.
 Non-Renewal By Executive.
 Non-Renewal by the Company.
  -9-




---



##### 



Forfeiture of Compensation.
 Resignation as Officer and/or Director Upon Employment Termination.
 Definition of Change in Control
   -10-




---



##### 



-11-




---



##### 



Severance Release.
  -12-




---



##### 



Suspension of Payments Upon Termination.
 Non-Disclosure.
 Restrictive Covenants.
  -13-




---



##### 



Non-Competition.
 Non-Solicitation of Customers.
 Non-Interference With Customers.
 Non-Interference With Contractors and Vendors.
  -14-




---



##### 



Non-Solicitation of Employees
 Direct or Indirect Activities.
 Survival of Restrictive Covenants.
 Extension.
 Severability; Modification of Restrictions.
 Remedies.
  -15-




---



##### 



No Additional Payment to Account for Excise Taxes
 Assignment.
 Assignment by Company.
 Non-Assignment by Executive.
 Notice.
  
  -16-




---



##### 



Miscellaneous.
 Entire Agreement
 Modification.
 Counterparts.
 Tax Withholding.
 Contractual Rights to Benefits.
 No Waiver.
 Governing Law; Choice of Forum.
  -17-




---



##### 



Arbitration of Disputes.
 Interpretation.
  -18-




---



##### 



INTEGRA BANK CORPORATION
 By:Bradley M. StevensName:Title:Company
    
    Executive
  -19-