alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| (logo) WELLS  FARGO | **Commercial  Mortgage Servicing**D1050-084,  8th Floor  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|---------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

 

Referenceis hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of November1, 2012, by and among Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation, asDepositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer,Certificate Administrator, Paying Agent and Custodian, Torchlight LoanServices, LLC, as Special Servicer, U.S. Bank National Association, as Trusteeand Park Bridge Lender Services LLC, as Operating Advisor, with respect toCommercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2012-CCRE4 (the"Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise definedshall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuantto Section 10.11 of this Agreement, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President ofCommercial Mortgage Services and Timothy S. Ryan, Managing Director of CustomerRelationship Management, do hereby certify that:

 

1.       Areview of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from January1, 2017 through December 31, 2017 (the “Reporting Period”), and of itsperformance per the Agreement during such period has been made under mysupervision, and

 

2.       Tothe best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer hasfulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respectsthroughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

INWITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28thday of February 2018.

 

 

/s/Daniel Bober

DanielBober

ExecutiveVice President

WellsFargo Bank

 

/s/Timothy S. Ryan

TimothyS. Ryan

ManagingDirector

WellsFargo Bank

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank,  N.A. | (logo) Together  we’ll go far |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
2007-1449.

#### State v. Cotton.

Hamilton App. No. C-060264. Discretionary appeal accepted; cause held for the decision in 2007-0184, *State v. Brown,*Cuyahoga App. No. 87651, 2006-Ohio-6267; and briefing schedule stayed. Motion to compel counsel denied.

Pfeifer, O’Connor, and Lanzinger, JJ., dissent.
Subpart 2827.3 - Patent Rights Under

Government Contracts

Parent topic: PART 2827 - PATENTS, DATA, AND COPYRIGHTS

2827.303 Contract clauses.

The SPE is the agency head for the purposes of FAR 27.303(e)(4).
Exhibit 33.4b



|              |  |  |  |  |  |                                                                                  
|------------- |  |  |  |  |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|LOGO ASSURANT |  |  |  |  |  | 260 Interstate North Circle, SE Atlanta, GA
30339 T 770.763-4000
www.assurant.com

February 26, 2018

REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH

§1122(d)(2)(vi), §1122(d)(4)(xi) and §1122(d)(4)(xii)

of REGULATION AB SERVICING CRITERIA

FOR THE REPORTING PERIOD

JANUARY 1, 2017 TO DECEMBER 31, 2017

American Security Insurance Company, Standard Guaranty Insurance Company and TrackSure Insurance Agency, Inc. (collectively, the Asserting Party)
is responsible for assessing compliance for the period of January 1, 2017 through December 31, 2017 (the Reporting Period) with the servicing criteria set forth in §1122(d)(2)(vi), §1122(d)(4)(xi) and
§1122(d)(4)(xii) of Title 17, §229.1122(d) of the Code of Federal Regulations, (the Applicable Servicing Criteria) which the Asserting Party has concluded are applicable to the insurance escrow servicing activities it performs
with respect to all mortgage backed securities transactions that were registered after January 1, 2006 with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933 (the Platform Transactions). The Asserting
Party used the criteria set forth in paragraph(d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB to assess the compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.

The Asserting Party has assessed its compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria for the Reporting Period and has concluded that the Asserting Party has
complied, in all material respects, with the Applicable Servicing Criteria for the Reporting Period with respect to the Platform Transaction.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on the assessment of compliance with the
Applicable Servicing Criteria as of and for the Reporting Period.

American Security Insurance Company

Standard Guaranty Insurance Company

TrackSure
Insurance Agency, Inc.



|                                                         
|---------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Garret Hale                                          
|By: Garrett Hale                                         
|Sr. Vice President of American Security Insurance Company
|and Standard Guaranty Insurance Company                  
|                                                         
|Date: 2-26-2018
§ 430.52 Requirements for applications. ( a ) Each application filed under this subpart shall be submitted in triplicate to: U.S. Department of Energy, Small Business Exemptions, Appliance Efficiency Standards, Assistant Secretary for Conservation and Renewable Energy, Forrestal Building, 1000 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20585.
( b ) An application shall be in writing and shall include the following: ( 1 ) Name and mailing address of applicant;
( 2 ) Whether the applicant controls, is controlled by, or is under common control with another manufacturer, and if so, the nature of that control relationship;
( 3 ) The text or substance of the standard or portion thereof for which the exemption is sought and the length of time desired for the exemption;
( 4 ) Information showing the annual gross revenue of the applicant for the preceding 12-month period from all of its operations (including the manufacture and sale of covered products):
( 5 ) Information to show that failure to grant an exemption is likely to result in a lessening of competition;
( 6 ) Such other information, if any, believed to be pertinent by the petitioner; and
( 7 ) Such other information as the Secretary may require.
EXHIBIT 31.3

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT UNDER SECTION 302 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, John T. Reilly, certify that:

| 1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2017 of SeaWorld Entertainment, Inc.; and |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| Date: March 1, 2018 | Signature: | /s/ John T. Reilly         |
|---------------------|------------|---------------------------------|
|                |       | John T. Reilly                  |
|                |       | Interim Chief Executive Officer |
|                |       | (Principal Executive Officer)   |
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------


                   Certification of Periodic Financial Report
                   ------------------------------------------


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, Andrew E. Kersey, the President and
Chief Executive Officer, and Jeffery A. Baird, the Chief Financial Officer of
CAS Medical Systems, Inc. (the "issuer"), do hereby certify that the report on
Form 10-Q accompanying this certification (the "report") fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that information contained in the report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the issuer.



/s/ Andrew E. Kersey
--------------------------
Andrew E. Kersey
President and Chief Executive Officer
CAS Medical Systems, Inc.

August 6, 2008




/s/ Jeffery A. Baird
--------------------------
Jeffery A. Baird
Chief Financial Officer
CAS Medical Systems, Inc.

August 6, 2008
#### § 986.7 Container.

*Container* means a box, bag, crate, carton, package (including retail packaging), or any other type of receptacle used in the packaging or handling of pecans.
#### § 1016.24 Destruction of classified matter containing Restricted Data.

Documents containing Restricted Data may be destroyed by burning, pulping, or another method that assures complete destruction of the information which they contain. Restricted Data contained in classified matter, other than documents, may be destroyed only by a method that assures complete obliteration, removal, or destruction of the Restricted Data.

[82 FR 41508, Sept. 1, 2017]
§ 36.19 Request for written statements. ( a ) After the filing of the original application, the Commission may request further information necessary to enable the Commission to determine whether the application should be granted or denied.
( b ) Each license is issued with the condition that the licensee will, at any time before expiration of the license, upon the Commission's request, submit written statements to enable the Commission to determine whether the license should be modified, suspended, or revoked.
###### Editorial Note on Part 31

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 31 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

#### § 31.21 Maintenance of records.

Each record required by this part must be legible throughout the retention period specified by each Commission regulation. The record may be the original or a reproduced copy or a microform provided that the copy or microform is authenticated by authorized personnel and that the microform is capable of producing a clear copy throughout the required retention period. The record may also be stored in electronic media with the capability for producing legible, accurate, and complete records during the required retention period. Records such as letters, drawings, specifications, must include all pertinent information such as letters, stamps, initials, and signatures. The licensee shall maintain adequate safeguards against tampering with and loss of records.

[53 FR 19246, May 27, 1988. Redesignated at 72 FR 55927, Oct. 1, 2007]
###### Editorial Note on Part 37

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 37 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

#### § 37.9 Interpretations.

Except as specifically authorized by the Commission in writing, no interpretations of the meaning of the regulations in this part by any officer or employee of the Commission other than a written interpretation by the General Counsel will be recognized as binding upon the Commission.
Editorial Note on Part 35
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 35 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

§ 35.2406 Records of brachytherapy source accountability. ( a ) A licensee shall maintain a record of brachytherapy source accountability required by § 35.406 for 3 years.
( b ) For temporary implants, the record must include— ( 1 ) The number and activity of sources removed from storage, the time and date they were removed from storage, the name of the individual who removed them from storage, and the location of use; and
( 2 ) The number and activity of sources returned to storage, the time and date they were returned to storage, and the name of the individual who returned them to storage.
( c ) For permanent implants, the record must include— ( 1 ) The number and activity of sources removed from storage, the date they were removed from storage, and the name of the individual who removed them from storage;
( 2 ) The number and activity of sources not implanted, the date they were returned to storage, and the name of the individual who returned them to storage; and
( 3 ) The number and activity of sources permanently implanted in the patient or human research subject.
#### McGregor *v.*Pilcher *et al.*

August 13, 1913.

Complaint. Before Judge Walker. Warren superior court. July 20, 1912.

*John T. West*and *William M. Hawes,*for plaintiff.

*F. P. Davis*and *M. L. Felts,*for defendants.

Atkinson, J.

There being no complaint that any error was committed upon the trial, and the evidence being sufficient to authorize the verdict, the court did not err in refusing a new trial.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
2131.270 Contract clauses.       The clause at 2152.231-70 shall be inserted in all FEGLI Program contracts.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 2131.2 - Contracts With Commercial Organizations
Exhibit 35.1



|     |  |  |  |                                                                                                                        
|---- |  |  |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|LOGO |  |  |  | Corporate Trust Services
 MAC R1204-010
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045 
Tel: 410 884 2000 Fax: 410 715 2380

Citibank, N.A.

388 Greenwich
Street

14th Floor

New York, New York 10013



|RE: | Annual Statement of Compliance for Sequoia Mortgage Trust 2013-2
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------

Per the Amended and Restated Pooling and
Servicing Agreement dated as of January 1, 2014 (the Agreement), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Master Servicer (Wells Fargo), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the year
ending December 31, 2015 (the Reporting Period):

(a) A review of Wells Fargos activities during the Reporting Period and
of its performance under the Agreement has been made under such officers supervision; and

(b) To the best of such officers
knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.



|              
|--------------
|March 1, 2016 
|              
|LOGO          
|              
|Kristen Cronin
|Vice President



|                       |  |     
|---------------------- |  | ----
|Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. |  | LOGO
exv4w3w7






Exhibit 4.3.7




REDGATE MEDIA GROUP




AMENDMENT AGREEMENT TO SHAREHOLDERS AGREEMENT


This AMENDMENT AGREEMENT TO THE SHAREHOLDERS AGREEMENT (“Agreement”), effective as of December
9, 2009 (the “Effective Date”), is made and entered into by and among Redgate Media Group, a
corporation organized under the laws of the Cayman Islands (the “Company”), and the undersigned
John Pridjian (the “Purchaser”) with reference to the material facts and circumstances set forth in
the Recitals below.




RECITALS



A. The Purchaser is acquiring an aggregate of one thousand two hundred and seventy-three point five
six (1,273.56) shares of Class G Preference Shares (the “Shares”).



B. The Shares were acquired by previous purchasers pursuant to that certain Class G Preference
Share Purchase Agreement on December 4, 2009.



C. The previous purchasers also became parties to the Shareholders Agreement by executing that
certain Fourth Amendment to the Shareholders Agreement (the “SHA”) dated December 4, 2009.



D. Pursuant to the terms of the SHA all provisions contained therein shall be binding on all
subsequent purchasers and transferees.




AMENDMENT



NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the issuance of Shares, the mutual promises and acknowledgments
hereinafter made, and other good and valuable consideration receipt of which is hereby
acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:



1. Purchaser acknowledges having received and reviewed a copy of the SHA attached hereto as
Exhibit A respectively, including all exhibits, schedules, and amendments thereto, and
understands the contents thereof.



2. Purchaser hereby joins the SHA as a “Shareholder” as defined therein, and acknowledges, accepts
to be bound by, and agrees to the terms of the SHA.



3. Purchaser’s execution of this Agreement shall be deemed an execution of the SHA and unless
specified in this Agreement the terms and conditions thereof shall be included herein by this
reference.








 









 







IN WITNESS WHEREOF, and intending to be legally bound hereby, the parties have caused this
Amendment Agreement to be executed as of the date first set forth above.




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Company	 	 	 	 	 	Purchaser	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	REDGATE MEDIA GROUP,	 	 	 	JOHN PRIDJIAN
	A Cayman Islands corporation	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	By:	 	/s/ Peter Bush Brack	 	 	 	By:	 	/s/ John Pridjian
	 

	 	 
	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 
	 

	 	Name:
	 	Peter Bush Brack
	 	 	 	 	 	Name:
	 	John Pridjian
	 

	 	Title:
	 	Chairman & CEO	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 






 









 






EXHIBIT A




SHAREHOLDERS AGREEMENT



[See Exhibit 4.3.5]
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

ELIZABETH LYNNE HUTCHINSON, )

)

Plaintiffs, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.:

vs. ) CV-06-00700-WHA

) JURY DEMAND

PHENIX CITY BOARD OF EDUCATION,)

)

Defendant. )

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO EXTEND RULE 26(f) ORDER DEADLINE

Comes Now, the plaintiff and respectfully requests that this Court grant her a three-day

extension to comply with this Court’s August 28, 2006 Rule 26(f) Order. As grounds for said

motion, plaintiff states the following:

1. Due to trial preparation commitments and briefing deadlines in other cases plaintiff’s

counsel has been unable to conduct the Rule 26(f) meeting and finalize a Report of Parties

Planning Meeting. At the present time plaintiff’s counsel is unable to reach defendant’s counsel.

2. This three day extension will not prejudice either party and will allow the parties to

conduct the necessary Rule 26(f) conference and file their report with the Court.

3. If possible, the parties will submit the report sooner than the three-day extension.

Respectfully Submitted,

/s/Rocco Calamusa, Jr.

Rocco Calamusa, Jr.

Benjamin J. De Gweck

Counsel for the Plaintiff

Case 3:06-cv-00700-WHA-WC Document 8 Filed 09/11/2006 Page 1 of 2
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I do hereby certify that I filed today, September 11, 2006, by CM/ECF the above and

foregoing with copies being served on:

Sidney S. Smith

Smith & Smith, PC

1503 Broad Street

Phenix City, AL 36867

/s/ Rocco Calamusa, Jr.

OF COUNSEL

Case 3:06-cv-00700-WHA-WC Document 8 Filed 09/11/2006 Page 2 of 2
Subpart 603.1—Safeguards

Source: 64 FR 43620, Aug. 11, 1999, unless otherwise noted.

Parent topic: PART 603—IMPROPER BUSINESS PRACTICES AND PERSONAL CONFLICTS OF

INTEREST

603.104 Procurement integrity.

603.104-4 Disclosure, protection, and marking of contractor

bid or proposal information and source selection

information.

(a) The following classes of persons may be authorized to receive contractor bid or proposal

information or source selection information by the contracting officer or head of the contracting

activity, when such access is necessary to the conduct of an acquisition:

(1) Individuals involved in the selection process, such as the Contracting Officer's Representative,

technical evaluators, advisors, consultants, and the Source Selection Official;

(2) Clerical personnel directly involved in the acquisition;

(3) Supervisors in the contracting officer's chain of command;

(4) Contracting personnel involved in reviewing or approving the solicitation, contract, or contract

modification;

(5) Individuals from offices who may be required to perform pre-award audits, such as DCAA; and,

(6) Personnel in the following offices: Office of Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization

(OSDBU), Office of the Legal Adviser, Office of Legislative Affairs, Office of the Inspector General,

Office of the Procurement Executive, the Small Business Administration, and the Office of Federal

Contract Compliance Programs (Department of Labor).

(c) All information which is considered proprietary or source selection information shall be marked

to prevent its unauthorized disclosure before award. This may be performed by marking each page

of proprietary or source selection material with the statement “Source Selection Information—See

FAR 3.104” or “Proprietary Information—See FAR 3.104”, as applicable. Alternatively, this

requirement may be met by attaching Forms DS–1926, Proprietary Information (Cover Page), and

DS–1927, Source Selection Information (Cover Page), to any proprietary and source selection

information. Individuals responsible for preparing derivative documents which reference, cite, or

paraphrase proprietary or source selection information, are responsible for marking such documents

as indicated in this paragraph. The required marking or cover page shall be included when technical

proposals are submitted for evaluation and when an audit is requested. After award, the procedures

governing the Freedom of Information Act and related laws/regulations shall be followed regarding

release of proprietary or source selection information.
603.104-7 Violations or possible violations.

(a)

(1) The contracting officer shall report any violation or possible violation to the head of the

contracting activity after he or she has reviewed the documentation and has concluded that there is

no impact on the acquisition.

(d)(2)(ii)(B) The Procurement Executive is the agency head's designee for the purposes of FAR

3.104–7(d)(2)(ii)(B).
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-7862

KENNETH SHANNON,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

DAVID GARRAGHTY, Warden, Greensville

Correctional Center,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District

Judge. (CA-00-1323-AM)

Submitted: March 25, 2002 Decided: April 12, 2002

Before WILLIAMS, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kenneth Shannon, Appellant Pro Se. Eugene Paul Murphy, OFFICE OF

THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Kenneth Shannon appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 &

Supp. 2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a

certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the

reasoning of the district court. Shannon v. Garraghty, No. CA1323-AM (E.D. Va. filed Sept. 18, 2001; entered Sept. 19, 2001).

We deny Shannon’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
161 So.2d 278

#### S. C. DOWDEN v. HARTFORD ACCIDENT & INDEMNITY COMPANY et al.

No. 47079.

March 11, 1964.

In re: Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Company applying for certiorari *806or writ of review to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Rapides. 151 So. 2d 697.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal there is no error of law in its judgment.