alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### § 205.389 Rehearing and judicial review.

The procedures of Part III of the Federal Power Act apply to motions for rehearing of an emergency order. A request for clarification or reconsideration filed under § 205.385 of this subpart, if the filling entity so designates, may serve as a request for rehearing pursuant to section 313(a) of the Federal Power Act.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The undersigned hereby certifies, in her capacity as Chief Executive Officer of China Industrial Waste Management, Inc. (the “Company”), for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of her knowledge:





(1)           The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2011 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:  August 15, 2011





/s/ Jinqing DongName: Jinqing DongChairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer(Principal executive officer)





This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Clean Systems Technology
Group, Ltd. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2004,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), David Robbins, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

           (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

Dated: April 12, 2005



By: /S/ YONA LIEBOWITZ
-----------------------
Yona Liebowitz
Chief Financial Officer


            This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Editorial Note on Part 2
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

§ 2.1105 Definitions. As used in this part: ( a ) *Civilian nuclear power reactor* means a civilian nuclear power plant required to be licensed as a utilization facility under section 103 or 104(b) of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954.
( b ) *Spent nuclear fuel* means fuel that has been withdrawn from a nuclear reactor following irradiation, the constituent elements of which have not been separated by reprocessing.
Case 3:06-cr-00210-MEF-CSC Document 19 Filed 11/20/2006 Page 1 of 1
§ 39.1 Purpose and scope. ( a ) This part prescribes requirements for the issuance of a license authorizing the use of licensed materials including sealed sources, radioactive tracers, radioactive markers, and uranium sinker bars in well logging in a single well. This part also prescribes radiation safety requirements for persons using licensed materials in these operations. The provisions and requirements of this part are in addition to, and not in substitution for, other requirements of this chapter. In particular, the provisions of parts 19, 20, 21, 30, 37, 40, 70, 71, and 150 of this chapter apply to applicants and licensees subject to this part.
( b ) The requirements set out in this part do not apply to the issuance of a license authorizing the use of licensed material in tracer studies involving multiple wells, such as field flooding studies, or to the use of sealed sources auxiliary to well logging but not lowered into wells.
[52 FR 8234, Mar. 17, 1987, as amended at 78 FR 17020, Mar. 19, 2013]
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Daniel McNab, Appellant, v Harold J. Smith, as Superintendent of the Attica Correctional Facility, Respondent.

Judgment unanimously affirmed (see *People ex rel.*
      *590
      *Barnes v Smith,*70 AD2d 764). (Appeal from judgment of Wyoming Supreme Court—habeas corpus.) Present—Cardamone, J. P., Simons, Hancock, Jr., Callahan and Moule, JJ.
#### In the Matter of Lawrence E. Elovich, Appellant, v. William D. Meisser et al., Constituting the Board of Elections of Nassau County, and Charles Hittleman et al., Respondents.

In a proceeding to invalidate petitions designating respondents Hittleman and Kaufman as candidates in the Democratic Party Primary Election to be held on June 17, 1969 for the Party position of County Committeeman for the 22nd Election District of the 14th Assembly District of the County of Nassau, and for injunctive relief, petitioner appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered June 5, 1969, which denied the application and dismissed the petition in the proceeding. Order reversed, on the law, without costs, and proceeding remitted to the Special Term for (1) a hearing of the objections to the designating petitions and (2) a new determination *(Matter of Elovich*v. *Meisser,*32 A D 2d 795). No questions of fact were considered on this appeal. Hopkins, Benjamin and Martuseello, JJ., concur; Beldock, P. J., and Rabin, J., dissent and vote to affirm the order, for the reasons set forth in their dissenting memorandum in *Matter of Elovich*v. *Meisser*(32 A D 2d 795).
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

 v. )

)

MELISSA WARD a/k/a “Melissa Foote” ) CR. NO. 2:06cr210-MEF

O R D E R

The defendant has been found guilty of a criminal offense in accordance with the

Constitution and laws of the United States. Accordingly, it is ORDERED as follows:

1. That sentencing of the defendant be, and the same is, hereby set on February 15, 2007,

at 9:00 a.m. in the Frank M. Johnson, Jr. United States Courthouse Complex, One Church Street,

Montgomery, Alabama.

2. That in accordance with Rule 32(f)(1), Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, on or before

January 25, 2007, the defendant and the Government shall communicate in writing to the probation

officer, and to each other, any objections they have as to any material information, sentencing

classifications, sentencing guideline ranges, and policy statements contained in or omitted from the

presentence report.

3. That, unless excused in writing by the Chief U.S. Probation Officer of this district,

counsel for the parties shall be available for a conference with the probation officer on January 30,

2007, at 10:00 a.m., to discuss and resolve, if possible, factual and legal issues contained in the

presentence report. If the probation officer determines or if any of the parties request that a personal

meeting be held to resolve the issues, such meeting shall be at the U.S. Probation Office, One

Church Street, Montgomery, AL, on the above date and time. Such request for a personal

conference shall be made to the probation officer within five (5) calendar days after receipt of the

presentence report. Otherwise, the conference shall be held telephonically. Any motion for

downward departure shall be filed on or before the conference date with the probation officer, unless

based on unknown and unforseen circumstances arising after that date, in which case the motion

must be filed promptly upon discovery of such circumstances. 

Nothing contained in this Order shall be construed as impairing the rights of any party as

established in the Constitution or laws of the United States.

DONE this the 29 day of November, 2006. th

 /s/ Mark E. Fuller 

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cr-00210-MEF-CSC Document 22 Filed 11/29/2006 Page 1 of 1
Editorial Note on Part 35
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 35 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

§ 35.647 Additional technical requirements for mobile remote afterloader units. ( a ) A licensee providing mobile remote afterloader service shall— ( 1 ) Check survey instruments before medical use at each address of use or on each day of use, whichever is more frequent; and
( 2 ) Account for all sources before departure from a client's address of use.
( b ) In addition to the periodic spot-checks required by § 35.643, a licensee authorized to use mobile afterloaders for medical use shall perform checks on each remote afterloader unit before use at each address of use. At a minimum, checks must be made to verify the operation of— ( 1 ) Electrical interlocks on treatment area access points;
( 2 ) Source exposure indicator lights on the remote afterloader unit, on the control console, and in the facility;
( 3 ) Viewing and intercom systems;
( 4 ) Applicators, source transfer tubes, and transfer tube-applicator interfaces;
( 5 ) Radiation monitors used to indicate room exposures;
( 6 ) Source positioning (accuracy); and
( 7 ) Radiation monitors used to indicate whether the source has returned to a safe shielded position.
( c ) In addition to the requirements for checks in paragraph (b) of this section, a licensee shall ensure overall proper operation of the remote afterloader unit by conducting a simulated cycle of treatment before use at each address of use.
( d ) If the results of the checks required in paragraph (b) of this section indicate the malfunction of any system, a licensee shall lock the control console in the off position and not use the unit except as may be necessary to repair, replace, or check the malfunctioning system.
( e ) A licensee shall retain a record of each check required by paragraph (b) of this section in accordance with § 35.2647.
Case 2:06-cv-00633-MEF-VPM Document 1-4 Filed 07/18/2006 Page 1 of 20
Case 2:06-cv-00633-MEF-VPM Document 1-4 Filed 07/18/2006 Page 2 of 20
Case 2:06-cv-00633-MEF-VPM Document 1-4 Filed 07/18/2006 Page 3 of 20
Case 2:06-cv-00633-MEF-VPM Document 1-4 Filed 07/18/2006 Page 4 of 20
Case 2:06-cv-00633-MEF-VPM Document 1-4 Filed 07/18/2006 Page 5 of 20
Case 2:06-cv-00633-MEF-VPM Document 1-4 Filed 07/18/2006 Page 6 of 20
Case 2:06-cv-00633-MEF-VPM Document 1-4 Filed 07/18/2006 Page 7 of 20
Case 2:06-cv-00633-MEF-VPM Document 1-4 Filed 07/18/2006 Page 8 of 20
Case 2:06-cv-00633-MEF-VPM Document 1-4 Filed 07/18/2006 Page 9 of 20
Case 2:06-cv-00633-MEF-VPM Document 1-4 Filed 07/18/2006 Page 10 of 20
Case 2:06-cv-00633-MEF-VPM Document 1-4 Filed 07/18/2006 Page 11 of 20
Case 2:06-cv-00633-MEF-VPM Document 1-4 Filed 07/18/2006 Page 12 of 20
Case 2:06-cv-00633-MEF-VPM Document 1-4 Filed 07/18/2006 Page 13 of 20
Case 2:06-cv-00633-MEF-VPM Document 1-4 Filed 07/18/2006 Page 14 of 20
Case 2:06-cv-00633-MEF-VPM Document 1-4 Filed 07/18/2006 Page 15 of 20
Case 2:06-cv-00633-MEF-VPM Document 1-4 Filed 07/18/2006 Page 16 of 20
Case 2:06-cv-00633-MEF-VPM Document 1-4 Filed 07/18/2006 Page 17 of 20
Case 2:06-cv-00633-MEF-VPM Document 1-4 Filed 07/18/2006 Page 18 of 20
Case 2:06-cv-00633-MEF-VPM Document 1-4 Filed 07/18/2006 Page 19 of 20
Case 2:06-cv-00633-MEF-VPM Document 1-4 Filed 07/18/2006 Page 20 of 20
Exhibit No. 32.4   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with this report of Questar Pipeline Company (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Martin H. Craven, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  QUESTAR PIPELINE COMPANY   November 4, 2010 /s/Martin H. Craven Martin H. Craven Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
```

[House Report 106-1000]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

106th Congress                                                   Report
                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
 2d Session                                                    106-1000

======================================================================

 
 WAIVING POINTS OF ORDER AGAINST THE CONFERENCE REPORT TO ACCOMPANY S. 
            835, THE ESTUARIES AND CLEAN WATERS ACT OF 2000

                                _______
                                

  October 24, 2000.--Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

                                _______
                                

     Mr. Goss, from the Committee on Rules, submitted the following

                              R E P O R T

                       [To accompany H. Res. 648]

    The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration 
House Resolution 648, by a nonrecord vote, report the same to 
the House with the recommendation that the resolution be 
adopted.

                SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

    The resolution waives all points of order against the 
conference report to accompany S. 835, the Estuaries and Clean 
Waters Act of 2000, and against its consideration. The 
conference report shall be considered as read.

                                

```
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

) CR. NO.1:06-cr-170-WHA-CSC

v. )

)

ROY DALE WALLACE ) 

ORDER

Upon consideration of the government's motion for release of prisoner (Doc. #231), filed on

December 4, 2006, and for good cause, it is 

ORDERED that the motion be and hereby is GRANTED.

It is further ORDERED that the United States Marshals Service shall release custody of ROY

DALE WALLACE to Special Agents Devin Whittle and/or Tom Halasz, from December 5, 2006,

through April 30, 2007, so that said agent can take such prisoner into custody without the necessity

of the presence of a Deputy United States Marshal. It is also

ORDERED that Special Agents Devin Whittle and/or Tom Halasz shall return said prisoner

into the custody of the United States Marshals Service when he has finished with him.

Done this 4 day of December, 2006. th

 /s/Charles S. Coody 

CHARLES S. COODY

CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:06-cr-00170-WHA-CSC Document 233 Filed 12/04/2006 Page 1 of 1
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

BLANCA MARTINEZ,

Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 19

- 002 71

- CR

Appeal from the

County Court at Law Number Two

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 20190C0339 9 )

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. This decision shall be certified

below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERE D THIS 31ST DAY OF MARCH, 2021.

GINA M. PALAFOX, Justice

Before Rodriguez, C.J., Palafox, and Alley, JJ.
IV 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 288

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives condemning bigotry 

and religious intolerance, and recognizing that holy books of every religion should be treated with dignity and respect. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 19, 2005

Mr. CONYERS (for himself, Ms. JACKSON-LEE of Texas, Ms. ESHOO, Mr. FILNER, Mr. KUCINICH, Mr. MEEHAN, Mr. PASCRELL, and Mr. SERRANO) 

submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee 

on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives condemning bigotry and religious intolerance, and recognizing that holy books of every religion should be treated 

with dignity and respect.

Whereas believers of all religions, including the Abrahamic 

faiths of Christianity, Judaism, and Islam, should be 

treated with respect and dignity; 

Whereas the word Islam comes from the Arabic root word 

meaning ‘‘peace’’ and ‘‘submission’’; 

Whereas there are an estimated 7,000,000 Muslims in America, from a wide variety of ethnic backgrounds, forming 

an integral part of the social fabric of America; 
2

•HRES 288 IH 

Whereas the Quran is the holy book for Muslims who recite 

passages from it in prayer and learn valuable lessons 

about peace, humanity, and spirituality; 

Whereas it should never be official policy of the United 

States Government to disparage the Quran, Islam, or any 

religion in any way, shape, or form; 

Whereas mistreatment of prisoners and disrespect toward the 

holy book of any religion is unacceptable and against civilized humanity; and 

Whereas the infringement of an individual’s right to freedom 

of religion violates the Constitution and laws of the 

United States: Now, therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

2 (1) condemns bigotry, acts of violence, and in3 tolerance against any religious group, including our 

4 friends, neighbors, and citizens of the Islamic faith; 

5 (2) declares that the civil rights and civil lib6 erties of all individuals, including those of the Is7 lamic faith, should be protected; 

8 (3) recognizes that the Quran, the holy book of 

9 Islam, as any other holy book of any religion, should 

10 be treated with dignity and respect; and 

11 (4) calls upon local, State, and Federal authori12 ties to work to prevent bias-motivated crimes and 

13 acts against all individuals, including those of the Is14 lamic faith.

Æ
§ 110.52 Revocation, suspension, and modification. ( a ) A license may be revoked, suspended, or modified for a condition which would warrant denial of the original license application.
( b ) The Commission may require further information from a licensee to determine whether a license should be revoked, suspended, or modified.
( c ) Except when the common defense and security or public health and safety requires otherwise, no license will be revoked, suspended, or modified before the licensee is informed in writing of the grounds for such action and afforded the opportunity to reply and be heard under procedures patterned on those in subpart I.
[43 FR 21641, May 19, 1978, as amended at 62 FR 59277, Nov. 3, 1997]
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
You havereached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC)Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC.Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of catalogingand locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications.  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the eventthat publications are no longer available from the original publishing agencysite. (Historical purposes)
**Title:Budget request, fiscal year**** 
SuDocNumber:OP1.1/3:
ItemNumber:0834-W-09(online)
CGPSystem Number:000602535
 
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
 
March4, 2020
 **
§ 1303.105 Requests for Board records. ( a ) A written FOIA request must be submitted. You may: ( 1 ) Write: NWTRB Designated FOIA Officer, 2300 Clarendon Boulevard, Suite 1300, Arlington, VA 22201;
( 2 ) Send an e-mail request to *foia@nwtrb.gov* and specify that this is a FOIA request in the subject line; or
( 3 ) Fax: 703-235-4495.
( b ) When making a request for records about a person, Privacy Act regulations also may apply. Please check the regulations for additional requirements before submitting a request. When making a request for records about someone other than yourself, you must include either: ( 1 ) Written authorization signed by the person permitting you to see the records; or
( 2 ) Proof that the individual is deceased (e.g., a death certificate or an obituary).
( c ) A request will be considered received for purposes of § 1303.107 on the date that it is received by the Board's FOIA office. For prompt handling, write “Freedom of Information Act Request” on the letter and envelope or in the subject line of the Web request or fax.
( d ) Each request must clearly describe the desired records in sufficient detail to enable Board personnel to locate them with reasonable effort. Response to requests may be delayed if the records are not clearly described.
( e ) Whenever possible, requests should include specific information about each record sought, such as date, title or name, author, recipient, and subject.
( f ) If the FOIA Officer determines that the request does not clearly describe the records sought, he or she will either advise you of the additional needed to locate the record or otherwise state why the request is insufficient. The requestor will then be given the opportunity to provide additional information or to modify their request.
( g ) Submitting a FOIA request shall be considered a commitment by the requestor to pay all applicable fees required under § 1303.108 unless the requestor seeks a waiver of fees. When making a request, you may specify a willingness to pay fees up to a specific amount.
( h ) The FOIA does not require the Board to: ( 1 ) Compile or create records solely for the purpose of satisfying a request for records.
( 2 ) Provide records not yet in existence, even if such records may be expected to come into existence at some time in the future.
( 3 ) Restore records destroyed or otherwise disposed of, except that the FOIA Officer must notify the requestor that the records have been destroyed or otherwise disposed of.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION

DONNA DORSEY DAVIS, etc., )

)

Plaintiff, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

v. ) 2:06cv766-MHT

) 

RICHARD M. DORSEY, etc., )

and CD&O, L.L.C., etc., )

)

Defendants. )

ORDER

It is ORDERED that the motion for summary judgment

(Doc. No. 31) is set for submission, without oral

argument, on April 27, 2007, with any opposing brief and

evidentiary materials by said date.

DONE, this the 11th day of April, 2007.

 /s/ Myron H. Thompson 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00766-MHT-TFM Document 33 Filed 04/11/2007 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

ALMA T. McBROOM, )

)

Plaintiff, )

v. ) CASE NO. 2:06-cv-767-MEF

)

VANESSA GORDON, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

ORDER

Upon consideration of the defendants' Motion to Withdraw its Motion to Dismiss, or

in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment (Doc. #79) filed on June 13, 2007, it is hereby

ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED and the clerk of court is directed to

terminate the Motion to Dismiss, or in the alternative, for summary judgment (Doc. #41)

filed on February 20, 2007. 

DONE this the 18th day of June, 2007.

 /s/ Mark E. Fuller 

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00767-MEF-SRW Document 81 Filed 06/18/2007 Page 1 of 1