alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 239 (Tuesday, December 14, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 77889]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-31286]



[[Page 77889]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Docket ID FEMA-2010-0002; Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-1946-DR]


Puerto Rico; Amendment No. 2 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (FEMA-1946-DR), dated October 26, 
2010, and related determinations.

DATES: Effective Date: November 29, 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peggy Miller, Office of Response and 
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW., 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-3886.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico is hereby amended to include the 
following areas among those areas determined to have been adversely 
affected by the event declared a major disaster by the President in his 
declaration of October 26, 2010.

    Cayey, Ciales, Corozal, and San Lorenzo Municipalities for 
Public Assistance.

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) 
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community 
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 
97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment 
Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, 
Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing Operations for 
Individuals and Households; 97.050 Presidentially Declared Disaster 
Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other Needs; 97.036, 
Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared 
Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

W. Craig Fugate,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2010-31286 Filed 12-13-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

vs. ) CR. NO. 3:06CR204-MEF

)

HENRY ERIK YAPIAS )

ORDER

Pursuant to the defendant’s Notice of Intent to Change Plea (Doc. #16) filed on

November 15, 2006, it is hereby

ORDERED that the defendant’s change of plea hearing be and is hereby set for 

November 20, 2006, at 2:00 p.m., in courtroom 4B, United States Courthouse

Complex, One Church Street, Montgomery, Alabama. 

The Clerk is directed to provide a court reporter for this proceeding. If the

defendant is in custody, the United States Marshal or the person having custody of the

defendant shall produce the defendant for the proceeding.

Done this 15th day of November, 2006.

 /s/Charles S. Coody 

CHARLES S. COODY

CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 3:06-cr-00204-MEF-CSC Document 17 Filed 11/15/2006 Page 1 of 1
Case 2:06-mc-03334-MHT Document 11 Filed 10/04/2006 Page 1 of 9
Case 2:06-mc-03334-MHT Document 11 Filed 10/04/2006 Page 2 of 9
Case 2:06-mc-03334-MHT Document 11 Filed 10/04/2006 Page 3 of 9
Case 2:06-mc-03334-MHT Document 11 Filed 10/04/2006 Page 4 of 9
Case 2:06-mc-03334-MHT Document 11 Filed 10/04/2006 Page 5 of 9
Case 2:06-mc-03334-MHT Document 11 Filed 10/04/2006 Page 6 of 9
Case 2:06-mc-03334-MHT Document 11 Filed 10/04/2006 Page 7 of 9
Case 2:06-mc-03334-MHT Document 11 Filed 10/04/2006 Page 8 of 9
Case 2:06-mc-03334-MHT Document 11 Filed 10/04/2006 Page 9 of 9
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
You havereached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC)Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC.Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of catalogingand locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications.  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the eventthat publications are no longer available from the original publishing agencysite. (Historical purposes)
**Title:****Grants resultsreport**** 
SuDocNumber:Y3.IN 8/25:18
ItemNumber:1051-D-01(online)
CGPsystem Number:000600934
 
200320042006200720082009-10201120122013
 
February 26, 2020
 **
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 268 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 268

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                          May 11, 2005.
    Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker 
may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XVIII, declare the House resolved into the 
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of the 
bill (H.R. 1279) to amend title 18, United States Code, to reduce violent gang 
crime and protect law-abiding citizens and communities from violent criminals, 
and for other purposes. The first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. 
All points of order against consideration of the bill are waived. General debate 
shall be confined to the bill and shall not exceed one hour equally divided and 
controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on the 
Judiciary. After general debate the bill shall be considered for amendment under 
the five-minute rule. It shall be in order to consider as an original bill for 
the purpose of amendment under the five-minute rule the amendment in the nature 
of a substitute recommended by the Committee on the Judiciary now printed in the 
bill. The committee amendment in the nature of a substitute shall be considered 
as read. Notwithstanding clause 11 of rule XVIII, no amendment to the committee 
amendment in the nature of a substitute shall be in order except those printed 
in the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution. Each such 
amendment may be offered only in the order printed in the report, may be offered 
only by a Member designated in the report, shall be considered as read, shall be 
debatable for the time specified in the report equally divided and controlled by 
the proponent and an opponent, shall not be subject to amendment, and shall not 
be subject to a demand for division of the question in the House or in the 
Committee of the Whole. All points of order against such amendments are waived. 
At the conclusion of consideration of the bill for amendment the Committee shall 
rise and report the bill to the House with such amendments as may have been 
adopted. Any Member may demand a separate vote in the House on any amendment 
adopted in the Committee of the Whole to the bill or to the committee amendment 
in the nature of a substitute. The previous question shall be considered as 
ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to final passage without intervening 
motion except one motion to recommit with or without instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
48.101 General.

(S-90) When a contracting officer receives a Value Engineering Change Proposal (VECP) from the

contractor, the contracting officer / acquisition team shall:

(1) Acknowledge receipt within 5 business days.

(2) Provide a copy to the Program Management Office (PMO) and copy the DISA VE Senior

Management Official in the DISA Office of the Component Acquisition Executive; the evaluation shall

convene within 10 business days and the KO shall be notified of the acceptance or rejection within

15 business days.

(3) If additional information is needed, the PMO will notify the contractor, and copy the Contracting

Officer and VE Senior Management Official. If negotiation of the VE is required, the KO shall lead

the negotiations.

(4) If accepted, the KO shall execute a bilateral modification to the contract citing the VE clause in

the contract as the authority for the modification.

(5) If VECP is not accepted, the KO will notify the Contractor in writing, with an explanation of why

the VECP was not accepted. The KO will copy the PMO and the VE Senior Management Official.

Parent topic: SUBPART 48.1 – POLICIES AND PROCEDURES
Exhibit 35.3

[Cenlar Logo]

SERVICER
COMPLIANCE STATEMENT (ITEM 1123)

Cenlar FSB

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Cenlar FSB, as servicer (the Servicer) pursuant to the applicable servicing agreements governing the
securities listed on Exhibit A, does hereby certify that:

1. A review of the Servicers activities during the period 1/1/13 to 12/31/13 (the
Reporting Period) and of the Servicers performance under the applicable servicing agreement has been made under my supervision.

2. To
the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the applicable servicing agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 26th day of February 2014.



|    |  |                             
|--- |  | ----------------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Michael Blair           
|    |  | Name: Michael Blair         
|    |  | Title: Senior Vice President



---

Exhibit A

Securities Covered in Cenlar FSBs Servicer Compliance Statement 1123:

Redwood Trust, Inc.



|         |  |                     |  |             |  |                                  |                 | 
|-------- |  | ------------------- |  | ----------- |  | -------------------------------- | --------------- | 
|Investor |  | Issuer              |  | Security    |  | * PeriodSubserviced byCenlar FSB |                
|HO6      |  | Redwood Trust, Inc. |  | SEMT 2012-1 |  |                                  | 1/1 to 12/31/13 | 
|K06      |  | Redwood Trust, Inc. |  | SEMT 2012-2 |  |                                  | 1/1 to 12/31/13 | 
|L06      |  | Redwood Trust, Inc. |  | SEMT 2012-3 |  |                                  | 1/1 to 12/31/13 | 
|Z06      |  | Redwood Trust, Inc. |  | SEMT 2012-4 |  |                                  | 1/1 to 12/31/13 | 
|Y06      |  | Redwood Trust, Inc. |  | SEMT 2012-5 |  |                                  | 1/1 to 12/31/13 | 
|RW0      |  | Redwood Trust, Inc. |  | SEMT 2012-6 |  |                                  | 1/1 to 12/31/13 | 
|RW1      |  | Redwood Trust, Inc. |  | SEMT 2013-1 |  |                                  | 1/1 to 12/31/13 | 
|RW2/S11  |  | Redwood Trust, Inc. |  | SEMT 2013-2 |  |                                  | 2/1 to 12/31/13 | 
|RW3      |  | Redwood Trust, Inc. |  | SEMT 2013-3 |  |                                  | 3/1 to 12/31/13 | 
|RW4      |  | Redwood Trust, Inc. |  | SEMT 2013-4 |  |                                  | 4/1 to 12/31/13 | 
|RW5      |  | Redwood Trust, Inc. |  | SEMT 2013-5 |  |                                  | 5/1 to 12/31/13 | 
|RW6      |  | Redwood Trust, Inc. |  | SEMT 2013-6 |  |                                  | 6/1 to 12/31/13 | 
|RW7      |  | Redwood Trust, Inc. |  | SEMT 2013-7 |  |                                  | 7/1 to 12/31/13 |
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

 )

 v. ) CR. NO. 2:06-CR-205-WHA

) 

COURTNEY D. FLOWERS ) 

)

United States’s Motion for Downward Departure 

for Acceptance of Responsibility

The United States moves this Court to reduce Courtney Flowers’s offense level by

one-level based on Flowers’s acceptance of responsibility. As grounds for this Motion, the

United States notes:

1. On or about the week of September 18, 2006–approximately one week prior

to the pretrial conference in this case–Flowers’s counsel indicated that Flowers would like

to plead guilty to the charges in this case. 

2. This was sufficiently early to permit the Government to avoid preparing for

trial and to allocate its resources efficiently. 

3. Therefore, under United States Sentencing Guidelines § 3E1.1(b), the United

States makes this formal request for a one-level reduction in Flowers’s offense level for

acceptance of responsibility so that he shall receive a total reduction for acceptance of

responsibility of three-levels.

Respectfully submitted this the 29th day of January, 2006.

Case 2:06-cr-00205-WHA-CSC Document 37 Filed 01/29/2007 Page 1 of 2
-2-

LEURA G. CANARY

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

/s/ Christopher Snyder 

CHRISTOPHER A. SNYDER

Assistant United States Attorney

One Court Square, Suite 201

Montgomery, AL 36104

Phone: (334) 223-7280

Fax: (334) 223-7135

E-mail: christopher.a.snyder@usdoj.gov 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on January 29, 2006, I electronically filed the foregoing with

the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system, which will send notification of such

filing to all attorneys of record.

/s/ Christopher Snyder 

CHRISTOPHER A. SNYDER

Assistant United States Attorney

Case 2:06-cr-00205-WHA-CSC Document 37 Filed 01/29/2007 Page 2 of 2
#### Dorothy M. Schluter et al., Respondents-Appellants, v. Louis E. Wolfson, Appellant-Respondent, et al., Defendants.

Order and judgment (one paper) entered on September 19, 1969, unanimously modified on the law to the extent of denying plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and vacating the judgment thereon and, as so modified, affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. This action is one to recover sums allegedly paid to Wolfson by the corporate defendants in excess of the amounts allowable pursuant to a stipulation of settlement of prior consolidated derivative actions. Paragraph 4 (b) of the stipulation provides as follows: “ The defendant Louis E. Wolfson will not receive from or be paid by Merritt or Revday, or any subsidiary of Merritt or Revday, any compensation for services rendered of any nature or by way of expense allowances, both or either, in excess of a total of $150,000 in any calendar year from the date hereof through December 31, 1968. From and after January 1, 1969, and until the liquidation or dissolution of Merritt, Revday, or any subsidiary, is completed, the defendant Louis E. Wolfson will not receive from or be paid by Merritt or Revday or any subsidiary of Merritt or Revday, any compensation for services rendered of any nature or by way of expense allowances, both or either in excess of a total of $50,000 in any calendar year.” This stipulation dated May 29, 1967 did not become final until April 24, 1968 since a further stipulation provided that consummation of the settlement must await final judgment of approval as well as the expiration of time to appeal. Paragraph 4 (b) of the stipulation presents a conflict between the phrase “from the date hereof ”, which is May 29, 1967, and “calendar year” which the court below interpreted as running from January 1, 1967. This presents an ambiguity. Defendants contend “from the date hereof” was purposely inserted in order to eliminate from the limitation on Wolf son’s compensation the sums he had already been paid. The interpretation of the court below would require defendants to repay excess compensation Wolfson allegedly received in that part of 1967 preceding the date of the stipulation. The intention of the parties therefore becomes relevant and a triable issue, however tenuous, is made out in this regard. Concur — Stevens, P. J., McGivern, McNally and Tilzer, JJ.
653.219-71 DOS form DS–4053, Department of State Mentor-Protégé Program Application.       As prescribed in 619.102–70(i), DS–4053 is prescribed for use in applying for an agreement under the Department of State Mentor-Protégé Program.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 653.2—Prescription of Forms
Order entered May 8, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-00083-CV

BEVER PROPERTIES, LLC, AND JESSE M. TAYLOR, D.D.S., P.A., Appellants

V.

PLANO PARKWAY OFFICE CONDOMINIUMS, A/K/A PLANO PARKWAY OFFICE

OWNERS ASSOCIATIONS, AND DR. JOJO CHEUNG, D.D.S., Appellees

On Appeal from the 366th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 366-04855-2013

ORDER

We GRANT appellants’ May 7, 2014 first unopposed motion to extend time to file brief 

and ORDER the brief be filed no later than June 13, 2014.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

JUSTICE
proteo_8k-ex1012.htm

 

    
      

    

    Exhibit 10.12

     

    
      
        Agreement
on the Assumption of Debt

      

       

      Between

      


      the
Creditor

      


      Proteo,
Inc.- 2102 BUSINESS
CENTER DRIVE, SUITE 130, IRVINE, CA 92612 , USA

      


      and

      


      the new
Debtor

      


      btd
biotech development GmbH, Opitzstrasse 12, 40470 Düsseldorf,
Germany

      


      FID Esprit AG, Schlyffistrasse 17f,
8806 Bäch (SZ), CH owes to the creditor an amount of US$ 1,803,631.85 under that
certain promissory note dating from June 9, 2008, in the original principal
amount of US$3,600,000, issued in connection with that certain PREFERRED STOCK
PURCHASE AGREEMENT dating from June 9, 2008, as modified by that certain
Forbearance Agreement dating from July 6th, 2009.  In place of FID
Esprit AG the new debtor hereby assumes without consideration and without any
benefits in return the obligations of FID Esprit AG resulting from the
abovementioned agreements vis-à-vis the creditor; the creditor consents to this
assumption of debt with discharging effect on FID Esprit AG. The
GUARANTOR for the debt of the FID Esprit consents to the assumption of debt and
expressly acknowledges, agrees and consents to the continuing validity of his
guaranty of the unpaid principal amount of the promissory note in favour of the
Creditor.

      


      Dated
February 11th, 2010.

       

      
" new Debtor "

       btd biotech development
GmbH

      


      /s/Wolfgang
Riemann                                                                

      Wolfgang
Riemann

      Geschäftsführer
(CEO)

       

      


      “
Creditor ”

       

       PROTEO,
INC.

       

      /s/Birge
Bargmann

      Birge
Bargmann

      President

       

      


       

      "GUARANTOR"

       

      /s/Axel J.
Kutscher

      Axel J.
Kutscher

      an
Individual
Editorial Note on Part 4
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 4 appear at 77 FR 39904, July 6, 2012.

§ 4.324 Information requirements. Each recipient shall: ( a ) Make available upon request to NRC information necessary to determine whether the recipient is complying with the Act and these regulations.
( b ) Permit reasonable access by NRC to the recipient's books, records, accounts, facilities, and other sources of information to the extent necessary to determine whether the recipient is in compliance with the Act and these regulations.
§ 205.173 Public hearings. ( a ) A public hearing shall be convened incident to a rulemaking: ( 1 ) When the proposed rule or regulation is likely to have a substantial impact on the Nation's economy or large numbers of individuals or businesses; or
( 2 ) When the DOE determines that a public hearing would materially advance the consideration of the issue. A public hearing may be requested by any interested person in connection with a rulemaking proceeding, but shall only be convened on the initiative of the DOE unless otherwise required by statute.
( b ) A public hearing may be convened incident to any proceeding when the DOE in its discretion determines that such public hearing would materially advance the consideration of the issue.
( c ) A public hearing may only be convened after publication of a notice in the Federal Register, which shall include a statement of the time, place, and nature of the public hearing.
( d ) Interested persons may file a request to participate in the public hearing in accordance with the instructions in the notice published in the Federal Register. The request shall be in writing and signed by the person making the request. It shall include a description of the person's interest in the issue or issues involved and of the anticipated content of the presentation. It shall also contain a statement explaining why the person would be an appropriate spokesperson for the particular view expressed.
( e ) The DOE shall appoint a presiding officer to conduct the public hearing. An agenda shall be prepared that shall provide, to the extent practicable, for the presentation of all relevant views by competent spokespersons.
( f ) A verbatim transcript shall be made of the hearing. The transcript, together with any written comments submitted in the course of the proceeding, shall be made available for public inspection and copying in the public docket room, as provided in § 205.15.
( g ) The information presented at the public hearing, together with the written comments submitted and other relevant information developed during the course of the proceeding, shall provide the basis for the DOE decision.
PGI 204.403 Responsibilities of contracting

officers.

(1) Consistent with the requirements at FAR Subpart 4.403, contracting officers shall ensure that

solicitations, to include any Broad Agency Announcement (BAA) or notice to industry, that requires

industry access to classified information and/or controlled unclassified information (see policy

memos), shall contain one or more of the following:

(i) Draft DoD Form DD 254, DoD Contract Security Classification Specification.

See Defense Security Service (DSS) guide for the preparation of the DD Form 254 at

http://www.dss.mil/isp/tools.html and select “A Guide for the Preparation of a DD Form 254”.

(ii) The clause at FAR 52.204-2, Security Requirements.

(iii) Detailed agency instructions for industry requirements to request access to classified

information and/or controlled unclassified information. Agency instructions shall clearly reference

and be in accordance with the National Industrial Security Program Operating Manual (NISPOM)

(DoD 5220-22-M) and Industrial Security Regulation (DoD 5220.22-R).

(iv) The following is a template of agency instructions to industry:

“Offerors must have a valid U.S. security clearance of [to be filled in by the contracting officer] or

higher in order to respond to this RFP (Announcement), because the RFP (Announcement) includes

an annex (information) classified at the [to be filled in by the contracting officer] level which will be

released only to offerors possessing the appropriate clearance. All classified material must be

handled in accordance with the National Industrial Security Program Operating Manual (NISPOM)

(DoD 5220-22-M) and Industrial Security Regulation (DoD 5220.22-R).”

(2) Fundamental research project determination.

(i) Projects being scoped as fundamental research may include the entire contract effort or a

specified portion of the statement of work, and must be documented in the written determination

and in the contract.

(ii) The determination of fundamental research shall occur when the project is added to the

statement of work, either prior to award or during a contract modification that modified the

statement of work.

(iii) Fundamental research is defined in the USD(A&S) memorandum on Fundamental Research,

dated May 24, 2010.

(iv) See clause 252.204-7000(a)(3), concerning disclosure of information for fundamental research

projects.

Parent topic: PGI 204.4 -SAFEGUARDING CLASSIFIED INFORMATION WITHIN INDUSTRY