79020 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 242 / Friday, December 17, 2010 / Notices 

20044–7611, and should refer to United 

States v. James Matteo & Sons, Inc. 

(D.N.J.) No. 1:10–cv–06405 (NLH–JS); 

D.J. Ref. 90–11–3–09689. 

During the public comment period, 

the Consent Decree may be examined on 

the following Department of Justice Web 

site, http://www.usdoj.gov/enrd/ 

Consent_Decrees.html. A copy of the 

Consent Decree may also be obtained by 

mail from the Consent Decree Library, 

P.O. Box 7611, U.S. Department of 

Justice, Washington, DC 20044–7611 or 

by faxing or e-mailing a request to Tonia 

Fleetwood (tonia.fleetwood@usdoj.gov), 

fax number (202) 514–0097, phone 

confirmation number (202) 514–1547. In 

requesting a copy from the Consent 

Decree Library, please enclose a check 

in the amount of $6.50 (25 cents per 

page reproduction cost) payable to the 

U.S. Treasury or, if by e-mail or fax, 

forward a check in that amount to the 

Consent Decree Library at the stated 

address. 

Maureen Katz, 

Assistant Chief, Environmental Enforcement 

Section, Environment and Natural Resources 

Division. 

[FR Doc. 2010–31726 Filed 12–16–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–15–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Notice of Proposed Consent Decree 

Modification Under the Clean Air Act 

Notice is hereby given that on 

December 13, 2010, four proposed 

Consent Decree amendments in United 

States, et al. v. Motiva Enterprises LLC, 

et al., Civil Action No. H–01–0978, were 

lodged with the United States District 

Court for the Southern District of Texas. 

The original settlement, entered on 

August 20, 2001, was for civil penalties 

and injunctive relief pursuant to Section 

113(b) of the Clean Air Act (‘‘CAA’’), 42 

U.S.C. 7413(b) covering nine petroleum 

refineries located in California, 

Delaware, Louisiana, Texas and 

Washington. These refineries were 

owned and operated by Motiva 

Enterprises LLC (‘‘Motiva’’), Equilon 

Enterprises LLC (‘‘Equilon’’) and Deer 

Park Refining Limited Partnership 

(‘‘Deer Park’’), which were subsidiaries 

or joint ventures of Shell Oil Company 

(‘‘Shell’’). The 2001 settlement was 

therefore embodied in four interlocking 

Consent Decrees covering each of the 

Shell companies that owned and 

operated the nine refineries. The four 

Consent Decree amendments lodged on 

December 13, 2010, would each make 

certain technical and administrative 

revisions, would reflect a transfer in 

ownership of one of the facilities 

covered by the settlement, and would 

make certain other minor modifications 

to each of the four interlocking Consent 

Decrees. 

The Department of Justice will receive 

comments relating to the proposed 

Consent Decree amendments for a 

period of thirty (30) days from the date 

of this publication. The proposed 

amendments may be examined at the 

Office of the United States Attorney, 

Southern District of Texas, U.S. 

Courthouse, 515 Rusk, Houston, Texas 

77002, and at EPA Region 6, 1445 Ross 

Avenue, Dallas, Texas 75202. Comments 

should be addressed to the Assistant 

Attorney General, Environment and 

Natural Resources Division, and either 

e-mailed to pubcommentees.enrd@usdoj.gov or mailed to P.O. 

Box 7611, U.S. Department of Justice, 

Washington, DC 20044–7611, and 

should refer to the matter as United 

States, et al. v. Motiva Enterprises LLC, 

et al., DOJ Ref. No. 90–5–2–1–07209. 

During the public comment period, 

the proposed amendments may also be 

examined on the following Department 

of Justice Web site: http:// 

www.usdoj.gov/enrd/ 

Consent_Decrees.html. Copies of the 

proposed amendments may also be 

obtained by mail from the Consent 

Decree Library, P.O. Box 7611, U.S. 

Department of Justice, Washington, DC 

20044–7611 or by faxing or e-mailing a 

request to Tonia Fleetwood 

(tonia.fleetwood@usdoj.gov), fax no. 

(202) 514–0097, phone confirmation 

number (202) 514–1547. In requesting 

from the Consent Decree Library a copy 

of the consent decree amendments for 

United States et al. v. Motiva 

Enterprises LLC, et al., Civil Action No. 

H–01–0978 (S.D. Tex.), please enclose a 

check in the amount of $17.25 (25 cents 

per page reproduction cost) payable to 

the U.S. Treasury. 

Maureen Katz, 

Assistant Chief, Environmental Enforcement 

Section, Environment and Natural Resources 

Division. 

[FR Doc. 2010–31727 Filed 12–16–10; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4410–15–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, 

and Explosives 

[OMB Number 1140–0006] 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities: Proposed Collection; 

Comments Requested 

ACTION: Revision 30-day notice of 

information collection under review: 

Application and Permit for Importation 

of Firearms, Ammunition and 

Implements of War. 

The Department of Justice (DOJ), 

Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms 

and Explosives (ATF) will be submitting 

the following information collection 

request to the Office of Management and 

Budget (OMB) for review and approval 

in accordance with the Paperwork 

Reduction Act of 1995. The proposed 

information collection is published to 

obtain comments from the public and 

affected agencies. This proposed 

information collection was previously 

published in the Federal Register 

Volume 75, Number 200, page 63860 on 

October 18, 2010, allowing for a 60 day 

comment period. 

The purpose of this notice is to allow 

for an additional 30 days for public 

comment until January 18, 2011. This 

process is conducted in accordance with 

5 CFR 1320.10. 

Written comments and/or suggestions 

regarding the items contained in this 

notice, especially the estimated public 

burden and associated response time, 

should be directed to The Office of 

Management and Budget, Office of 

Information and Regulatory Affairs, 

Attention Department of Justice Desk 

Officer, Washington, DC 20503. 

Additionally, comments may be 

submitted to OMB via facsimile to (202) 

395–5806. 

Written comments and suggestions 

from the public and affected agencies 

concerning the proposed collection of 

information are encouraged. Your 

comments should address one or more 

of the following four points: 

—Evaluate whether the proposed 

collection of information is necessary 

for the proper performance of the 

functions of the agency, including 

whether the information will have 

practical utility; 

—Evaluate the accuracy of the agencies 

estimate of the burden of the 

proposed collection of information, 

including the validity of the 

methodology and assumptions used; 

—Enhance the quality, utility, and 

clarity of the information to be 

collected; and 

—Minimize the burden of the collection 

of information on those who are to 

respond, including through the use of 

appropriate automated, electronic, 

mechanical, or other technological 

collection techniques or other forms 

of information technology, e.g., 

permitting electronic submission of 

responses. 


emcdonald on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with NOTICES