alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                               0000764039
<NAME>                          TECHDYNE, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                 1
<CURRENCY>                                 USD

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                            3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                  DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                     JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                       MAR-31-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                              1
<CASH>                                 214,046
<SECURITIES>                                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                        8,154,371
<ALLOWANCES>                                 0
<INVENTORY>                          8,873,435
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                    18,268,314
<PP&E>                              10,278,152
<DEPRECIATION>                       5,085,868
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                      26,758,333
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                6,789,617
<BONDS>                              8,357,560
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        0
<PREFERRED>                                  0
<COMMON>                                65,970
<OTHER-SE>                          10,889,774
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>        26,758,333
<SALES>                             12,638,394
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                    12,648,613
<CGS>                               11,475,966
<TOTAL-COSTS>                       11,475,966
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                     1,198,380
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                     194,966
<INCOME-PRETAX>                       (220,699)
<INCOME-TAX>                           (19,696)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                   (201,003)
<DISCONTINUED>                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              0
<CHANGES>                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                          (201,033)
<EPS-BASIC>                               (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                             (.03)


</TABLE>
MEMORANDUM

DATE: 12 / 09 /20 15

TO: CSAPR Update Proposal Meeting ; Docket I D : EPA

- HQ

- OAR

– 201 5

- 0 500

FROM: Jeremy Mark , EPA

SUBJECT: CSAPR Update Proposal Budget and Allocation Calculations

SUMMARY

A meeting was held between EPA and the below attendees on 12/09/2015 to discuss the

CSAPR Update Proposal

. The proposed CSAPR Updated Proposal was proposed on December

3

, 201 5

. Meeting materials and sign

- in sheets are provided if available.

ATTENDEES

Jeremy Mark, EPA

Mark Janssen, LADCO
#### EAGER, Respondent, v. FRENSDORF et al., Appellants.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

November 27, 1914.)

Action by William Eager, an infant, etc., against Rose Frensdorf and others. L. A. Malkiel, of New York City, for appellants. R. Foster, of New York City, for respondent.

No opinion. Order affirmed, with costs. Order filed.
EXHIBIT 31.2 - CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
               PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a)

I, Rod Lynam, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Gallery of History,
Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the quarter period
covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely
to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting;

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls.



Date: February 13, 2007            /s/  ROD LYNAM
                                 _______________________
                                 Rod Lynam
                                 Chief Financial Office
Exhibit 32.2





Certification of Chief Financial Officer


Pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)





In connection with this Annual Report on Form 10-K (the “Report”) of Harvest Capital Credit Corporation (the “Registrant”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Craig R. Kitchin, the Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.





/s/ Craig R. KitchinName:Craig R. KitchinDate:March 15, 2017
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

RUSSELL E. GARNER, ) 

) 

PLAINTIFF, ) 

) 

VS. ) CIVIL CASE NO.: 01:06cv781-MHT 

) 

PROGRESSIVE DIRECT INSURANCE ) 

COMPANY, ) 

) 

DEFENDANT. )

NOTICE OF DEPOSITION 

You are hereby notified that the plaintiff will take the testimony by deposition of Dr. J. 

Walter Jacobs, upon oral examination for the purpose of discovery or for use as evidence in 

this cause, or for both purposes, in accordance with the Alabama Rules of Civil Procedure, 

at the office of Dr. J. Walter Jacobs, Southeastern Psychological and Counseling 

Services, LLC, 256 Honeysuckle Road, Suite 14, Dothan, Alabama, 36305, on March 

7, 2007, beginning at 4:00 p.m., before a court reporter, notary public, or some other 

person authorized by law to administer oaths and take depositions. The examination will 

continue from day to day until completed. You are invited to attend and cross-examine. 

_______________________________ 

David W. Rousseau (ROU007) 

Attorney for Plaintiff 

211 W. Adams Street 

Dothan, Alabama 36303 

(334) 699-9000 

Case 1:06-cv-00781-MHT-TFM Document 15 Filed 03/05/2007 Page 1 of 2
2 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that I have served a copy of the above and foregoing by placing a 

copy of the same in the U.S. Mail, postage prepaid, and properly addressed this the ___ 

day of ____________, 2007, upon the following. 

Jeff Hunter 

Nix, Holtsford, Gilliland, 

Higgins & Hitson, P.C. 

P.O. Box 4128 

Montgomery, AL 36103 

Court Reporting Associates 

P.O. Box 1995 

Dothan, AL 36302 

___________________________ 

David W. Rousseau 

Case 1:06-cv-00781-MHT-TFM Document 15 Filed 03/05/2007 Page 2 of 2
#### § 205.198A Protective order.

A participant who has unsuccessfully attempted in writing to obtain information that another participant claims is confidential may file a Motion for Discovery and Protective Order. This motion shall meet the requirements of § 205.198 and shall specify the particular confidential information that the movant seeks and the reasons why the information is necessary to adequately present the movant's position in the proceeding. A copy of the written request for information, a certification concerning when and to whom it was served and a copy of the response, if any, shall be appended to the motion. The motion must give the possessor of the information notice that a Response to the Motion must be filed within ten days. The Response shall specify the safeguards, if any, that should be imposed if the information is ordered to be released. The Office of Hearings and Appeals may issue a Protective Order upon consideration of the Motion and the Response.
Exhibit 35.1

GMAC Mortgage

                    SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT (Item 1123)

                               GMAC Mortgage, LLC

                                   HBVW 06-SB1



The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of GMAC Mortgage, LLC, as servicer
(the "Servicer") pursuant to the applicable servicing agreement, does hereby
certify that:

1. A review of the Servicer's activities during the period covered by the
Issuing Entity's report on Form 10-K and of the Servicer's performance under the
applicable servicing agreement has been made under my supervision.

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled
all of its obligations under the applicable servicing agreement in all material
respects throughout such period.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 6th
day of March 2007.



By: /s/ Anthony N. Renzi
    --------------------------------
    Name:   Anthony N. Renzi
    Title:  Executive Vice President



GMAC Mortgage, LLC            www.gmacmortgage.com
500 Enterprise Road
Horsham, PA 19044
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

JAMES TYRONE EDWARDS, #244859, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:06cv740-MHT

) (WO)

SGT. MOORE, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

ORDER

There being no objections filed to the recommendation of the magistrate judge filed

on March 12, 2008 (doc. no. ), and after an independent and de novo review of the record,

said recommendation is adopted, and it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT, and DECREE of the

court that this case is dismissed without prejudice for plaintiff's failures to prosecute this

action properly and to comply with the orders of this court. 

It is further ORDERED that costs are taxed against the plaintiff, for which execution

may issue. 

DONE, this the 22nd day of April, 2008.

 /s Myron H. Thompson 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-00740-MHT-SRW Document 29 Filed 04/22/2008 Page 1 of 1
###### Editorial Note on Part 1045

#### Editorial Notes:Nomenclature changes to part 1045 appear at 88 FR 41294, June 26, 2023, and 88 FR 82238, Nov. 24, 2023.

§ 1045.165 Once matter marked as RD, FRD, or TFNI is declassified, how is it marked?

Editorial Notes:

Nomenclature changes to part 1045 appear at 88 FR 41294, June 26, 2023, and 88 FR 82238, Nov. 24, 2023.

(a) Matter that is determined to no longer contain RD, FRD, or TFNI and also does not or no longer contains NSI must be clearly marked to convey to the holder of that matter that the matter is declassified;

(b) The front page must identify the person authorizing the declassification by name and position or title, if not otherwise evident, agency, and office of origin; or with a unique identifier; the classification guide that served as the basis for the declassification by short title, date, agency and, when available, the office of origin; and the declassification date. For example:

(1) Declassified by: *Jane Doe, Nuclear Analyst, DOE, CTI-61*

(2) Derived from: *CG-ABC-1, 10/16/2014, DOE OC*

(3) Declassified on: *20201009*

(c) The person authorizing the declassification must line through but not obliterate the classification markings and apply or authorize the application of the appropriate markings.
#### Anthony Mastellone et al., Appellants, v City of New York, Respondent.

[813 NYS2d 669]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Partnow, J.), dated November 12, 2004, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff Anthony Mastellone allegedly was injured when he tripped and fell over the legs of a coat rack in a passageway at the defendant’s premises. The defendant established its prima facie entitlement to summary judgment dismissing the complaint by submitting evidence demonstrating that the coat rack was an open and obvious condition and was not inherently dangerous *(see Webber v Miller,*17 AD3d 352 [2005]; *Plis v North Bay Cadillac,*5 AD3d 578 [2004]; *Cupo v Karfunkel,*1 AD3d 48*[2003]).*In opposition, the plaintiffs failed to present evidence sufficient to raise a triable issue of fact *(see Jang Hee Lee v Sung Whun Oh,*3 AD3d 473 [2004]). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted the defendant’s motion. Florio, J.P., Santucci, Goldstein and Skelos, JJ., concur.
1805.303 Announcement of contract awards.       (a)(i) In lieu of the threshold cited in FAR 5.303(a), a NASA Headquarters public announcement is required for award of contract actions that have a total anticipated value, including unexercised options, of $5 million or greater.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 1805.3—Synopses of Contract Awards
## TECHNICAL DATA SHEET

Typical Properties

Solids 50% Moisture 50% pH 9-10 Specific Gravity 1.282 Pounds per Gallon 10.65 Appearance Clear, Nearly Colorless Liquid Odor Mild, Characteristic Water Miscibility Complete Freezing Point -72 

### ° F (-58 

### ° C) BOD (5-Day), g/g 0.25 COD, g/g 0.35

THE INFORMATION SET FORTH ON THIS DATA SHEET IS BELIEVED TO BE ACCURATE AS OF THE PRESENT DATE. SINCE THE ACTUAL USE BY OTHERS IS BEYOND OUR CONTROL, IT IS THE PURCHASER’S/USER’S RESPONSIBILITY TO DETERMINE THE SUITABILITY OF THE PRODUCT FOR THEIR OWN USE AND PURPOSE. NACHURS ALPINE SOLUTIONS MAKES NO REPRESENTATIONS OR WARRANTIES, EITHER EXPRESSED, IMPLIED OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. NACHURS ALPINE SOLUTIONS NEITHER ASSUMES RESPONSIBILITY REGARDING THE ACCURACY OR SUITABILITY OF SUCH INFORMATION OR PRODUCT FOR APPLICATION TO PURCHASER’S INTENDED USE OR PURPOSE NOR FOR THE CONSEQUENCES OF ITS USE. NO SUGGESTIONS FOR USE ARE INTENDED, AND NOTHING HEREIN SHALL BE CONSTRUED AS A RECOMMENDATION TO INFRINGE ANY EXISTING PATENTS OR TO VIOLATE ANY FEDERAL, STATE OR LOCAL LAWS, RULES OR REGULATIONS.

Rev 2/23/11
Subpart 1604.7—Contractor Records

Retention

Parent topic: PART 1604—ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS

1604.703 Policy.

In view of the unique payment schedules of FEHBP contracts and the compelling need for records

retention periods sufficient to protect the Government's interest, contractors shall be required to

maintain records for periods determined in accordance with the provisions of FAR 4.703(b)(1).

1604.705 Specific retention periods.

Unless the contracting officer determines that there exists a compelling reason to include only the

contract clause specified by FAR 52.215–2 “Audit & Records—Negotiation,” the contracting officer

shall insert the clause at 1652.204–70 in all FEHBP contracts.
§ 1021.212 Research, development, demonstration, and testing. ( a ) This section applies to the adoption and application of programs that involve research, development, demonstration, and testing for new technologies (40 CFR 1502.4(c)(3)). Adoption of such programs might also lead to commercialization or other broad-scale implementation by DOE or another entity.
( b ) For any proposed program described in paragraph (a) of this section, DOE shall begin its NEPA review (if otherwise required by this part) as soon as environmental effects can be meaningfully evaluated, and before DOE has reached the level of investment or commitment likely to determine subsequent development or restrict later alternatives, as discussed at 40 CFR 1502.4(c)(3).
( c ) For subsequent phases of development and application, DOE shall prepare one or more additional NEPA documents (if otherwise required by this part).
Case 2:06-cr-00198-WKW-CSC Document 16 Filed 08/15/2006 Page 1 of 1
162 So.2d 341

#### Betty Judd LEVERT, wife of Robert Louis Levert, Jr. v. Robert Louis LEVERT, Jr.

No. 46987.

March 19, 1964.

Bienvenu & Culver, by Robert N. Ryan, New Orleans, for Betty Judd Levert.

Garrett & Carl and Ogden, Woods, Henriques & Rives, by Clifton S. Carl, New Orleans, for Robert Louis Levert, Jr

HAMITER, Justice.

On motion of Betty Judd Levert and Robert Louis Levert, Jr. appearing herein through their undersigned counsel, and on suggesting to the Court that they have settled their differences and that they desire that the application for writ which was granted herein, 245 La. 98, 157 So.2d 236, be dismissed.

It is ordered by the Court that the application for writs which was granted herein be now dismissed and that the record be returned to the Court of Appeal for the Fourth Circuit, State of Louisiana, 156 So.2d 284.
# SUBCHAPTER F—SPECIAL CATEGORIES OF CONTRACTING    

- PART 1834—MAJOR SYSTEM ACQUISITION 
- PART 1835—RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CONTRACTING 
- PART 1836—CONSTRUCTION AND ARCHITECT-ENGINEER CONTRACTS 
- PART 1837—SERVICE CONTRACTING 
- PART 1839—ACQUISITION OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 

- PART 1834—MAJOR SYSTEM ACQUISITION     - Subpart 1834.2—Earned Value Management System     - 1834.201   Policy.
    - 1834.203   Solicitation provisions and contract clause.
    - 1834.203-70   NASA solicitation provision and contract clause.
- PART 1835—RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CONTRACTING    - 1835.016-70   Foreign participation under broad agency announcements (BAAs).
  - 1835.016-71   NASA Research Announcements.
  - 1835.070   NASA contract clauses and solicitation provision.
- PART 1836—CONSTRUCTION AND ARCHITECT-ENGINEER CONTRACTS    - Subpart 1836.2—Special Aspects of Contracting for Construction     - 1836.203   Government estimate of construction costs.(NASA supplements paragraph (c))
    - 1836.213-370   Additive and deductive items.
  - Subpart 1836.5—Contract Clauses     - 1836.513   Accident prevention.
    - 1836.570   NASA solicitation provisions and contract clause.
  - Subpart 1836.6—Architect-Engineer Services     - 1836.602   Selection of firms for architect-engineer contracts.
    - 1836.602-1   Selection criteria. (NASA supplements paragraph (a))
  - Subpart 1836.70—Partnering     - 1836.7004   NASA solicitation provision and contract clause.
- PART 1837—SERVICE CONTRACTING    - Subpart 1837.1—Service Contracts—General     - 1837.101   Definitions.
    - 1837.104   Personal services contracts. (NASA supplements paragraph (b))
    - 1837.110   Solicitation provisions and contract clauses.
    - 1837.110-70   NASA solicitation provision and contract clauses.
    - 1837.170   Pension portability.
  - Subpart 1837.2—Advisory and Assistance Services     - 1837.203   Policy.
    - 1837.203-70   Providing contractors access to sensitive information.
    - 1837.203-71   Release of contractors' sensitive information.
    - 1837.203-72   NASA contract clauses.
- PART 1839—ACQUISITION OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY     - Subpart 1839.1—General     - 1839.107   Contract clause.
    - 1839.107-70   NASA contract clause.
§ 1707.202 Factors DNFSB will consider. The General Counsel, in his or her sole discretion, may grant an employee permission to testify on matters relating to official information, or produce official records and information, in response to a demand or request. Among the relevant factors that the General Counsel may consider in making this decision are whether: ( a ) The purposes of this part are met;
( b ) Allowing such testimony or production of records would be necessary to prevent a miscarriage of justice;
( c ) DNFSB has an interest in the decision that may be rendered in the legal proceeding;
( d ) Allowing such testimony or production of records would assist or hinder DNFSB in performing its statutory duties or use DNFSB resources where responding to the request will interfere with the ability of DNFSB employees to do their work;
( e ) Allowing such testimony or production of records would be in the best interest of DNFSB or the United States;
( f ) The records or testimony can be obtained from other sources;
( g ) The demand or request is unduly burdensome or otherwise inappropriate under the applicable rules of discovery or the rules of procedure governing the case or matter in which the demand or request arose;
( h ) Disclosure would violate a statute, executive order or regulation;
( i ) Disclosure would reveal confidential, sensitive, or privileged information, trade secrets or similar, confidential commercial or financial information, or otherwise protected information, or would otherwise be inappropriate for release;
( j ) Disclosure would impede or interfere with an ongoing law enforcement investigation or proceedings;
( k ) Disclosure would compromise constitutional rights;
( l ) Disclosure would result in DNFSB appearing to favor one litigant over another;
( m ) Disclosure relates to documents that were produced by another agency;
( n ) A substantial Government interest is implicated;
( o ) The demand or request is within the authority of the party making it; and
( p ) The demand or request is sufficiently specific to be answered.
###### Editorial Note on Part 31

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 31 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

#### § 31.9 General license to own byproduct material.

A general license is hereby issued to own byproduct material without regard to quantity. Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter, a general licensee under this paragraph is not authorized to manufacture, produce, transfer, receive, possess, use, import or export byproduct material, except as authorized in a specific license.

[30 FR 8189, June 26, 1965]
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

ANGELA DENISE NAILS, )

 )

Plaintiff, )

 )

v. ) CASE NO. 1:06-cv-760-WKW

 )

CITY OF DOTHAN, )

 )

Defendant. )

ORDER

On September 25, 2006, the plaintiff filed a document stating that “[she] would like

to know if [she] paid the [filing] fees will the plaintiff [sic] case be heard before the court.”

(Doc. # 11.) The Court treats this document as a motion for clarification of its 

Order dismissing this case without prejudice. (See Doc. # 7.) It is hereby

ORDERED that the motion for clarification (Doc. # 11) is GRANTED. The Court

hereby clarifies that payment of the filing fee will not result in this case being heard because

this action has already been dismissed without prejudice. (See Docs. # 7 & 8.) 

DONE this 6 day of October, 2006. th

 /s/ W. Keith Watkins 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00760-WKW-DRB Document 12 Filed 10/10/2006 Page 1 of 1