alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.3

                    CERTIFICATION BY MEIR ELAZAR PURSUANT TO
                       SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT RULE 13A-14

I, Meir Elazar, certify that:


1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Clean Systems
Technology Group, Ltd.;


2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;


3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;


4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:


a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;



b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report (the
"Evaluation Date"); and



c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;


5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):


a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and


b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and


6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.





Date: June 6, 2004


/S/ MEIR ELAZAR
----------------
SECRETARY AND DIRECTOR



<PAGE>
222 So.2d 885

#### BARNWELL, INC. v. Sam E. CARTER et al.

No. 49836.

June 9, 1969.

In re: Mrs. Marjorie F. Peterson applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, Parish of Webster. 220 So.2d 741.

The application is denied. According to the facts of this case the judgment complained of is correct. See the decision of this court in the case of Mire v. Hawkins, 249 La. 278, 186 So.2d 591, cited in support of the decision.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>6
<LEGEND> THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE FORM 10-Q AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
<MULTIPLIER>1
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                  SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       9-MOS
<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST>             527,568
<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE>             83,600
<RECEIVABLES>                           0
<ASSETS-OTHER>                          0
<OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS>                7,994
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                     91,594
<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES>                0
<SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT>                 0
<OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES>         605,749
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES>               605,749
<SENIOR-EQUITY>                         0
<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON>          (70,187)
<SHARES-COMMON-STOCK>             106,990
<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR>             106,990
<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT>               0
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII>                  0
<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS>                 0
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS>                0
<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC>         (443,968)
<NET-ASSETS>                       91,594
<DIVIDEND-INCOME>                       0
<INTEREST-INCOME>                      24
<OTHER-INCOME>                          0
<EXPENSES-NET>                    198,501
<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME>          (198,477)
<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT>                0
<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT>       1,365,239
<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS>          (1,563,716)
<EQUALIZATION>                          0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME>               0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS>                0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER>                   0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD>                 0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED>             0
<SHARES-REINVESTED>                     0
<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS>         (1,563,716)
<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR>                 0
<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR>               0
<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR>                 0
<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR>              0
<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES>              14,784
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      0
<GROSS-EXPENSE>                   198,501
<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS>              267,703
<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN>                1.73
<PER-SHARE-NII>                     (1.73)
<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC>                 0
<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND>                    0
<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS>               0
<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL>                    0
<PER-SHARE-NAV-END>                     0
<EXPENSE-RATIO>                      74.1

</TABLE>
Case 2:06-cr-00205-WHA-CSC Document 42 Filed 02/01/2007 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 31.1.  CERTIFICATION  I, R. Allan Bradley, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this report of Questar Pipeline Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and we have:  a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting.  5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):  a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.     August 7, 2008 /s/R. Allan Bradley R. Allan Bradley President and Chief Executive Officer
Joint Committee on Taxation
August 4, 1992
JCX-30-92

Access to Tax Information by the Department of Veterans
Affairs: H.R. 5008 (Dependency and Indemnity Compensation
Reform Act of 1992), Scheduled for Markup in the

Committee on Ways and Means, August 5, 1992

Present Law

The Internal Revenue Code prohibits disclosure of tax
returns and return information of taxpayers, with exceptions
for authorized disclosure to certain Governmental entities in
certain enumerated instances (sec. 6103). Unauthorized
disclosure is a felony punishable by a fine not exceeding
$5,000 or imprisonment of not more than five years, or both
(sec. 7213). An action for civil damages also may be brought
for unauthorized disclosure (sec. 7431).

Among the disclosures permitted under the Code is
disclosure to the Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) of
self-employment tax information and certain tax information
supplied to the IRS and SSA by third parties. Disclosure is
permitted to assist DVA in determining eligibility for, and
establishing correct benefit amounts under, certain of its
needs-based pension and other programs (sec.
6103(1)(7)(D)(viii)). The income tax returns filed by the
veterans themselves are not disclosed to DVA.

The DVA disclosure provision is scheduled to expire
after September 30, 1992. It was added to the Code by
section 8051 of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1990
(P.L. 101-508).

H.R. 5008, As Reported by the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

On July 29, 1992, the House Committee on Veterans’
Affairs ordered reported H.R. 5008, the Dependency and
Indemnity Compensation Reform Act of 1992. Section 303 of
that bill extends this authority to disclose tax information
to the DVA for five years. The DVA disclosure provision
would be effective October 1, 1992, and would expire after
September 30, 1997.

Possible Option

Report favorably H.R. 5008, as reported by the Committee
on Veterans' Affairs, without amendment.

Previous Committee and House Action

This provision was included in H.R. 776 (the
Comprehensive National Energy Policy Act) (sec. 2034), as
favorably reported by the Committee on Ways and Means and as
passed by the House of Representatives.
Third Department,

April, 1970

(April 7, 1970)

#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Clark Dishaw, Appellant, v. Charles L. McKendrick, as Warden of Wallkill Prison, Respondent.

Appeal dismissed, without costs, on the ground that relator has been released on parole (see *People ex rel. Wilder*v. *Marhley,*26 N Y 2d 648). Herlihy, P. J., Reynolds, Aulisi, Staley, Jr., and Greenblott, JJ. concur.
#### § 150.21 Transportation of special nuclear material by aircraft.

Except as specifically approved by the Commission no shipment of special nuclear material in excess of 20 grams or 20 curies whichever is less of plutonium or uranium-233 shall be made by a licensee of an Agreement State in passenger aircraft.

[38 FR 3039, Feb. 1, 1973]
Case 2:06-cv-00690-MEF-SRW Document 8 Filed 08/30/2006 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

BRIAN BONNER, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

vs. ) CASE NO. 3:06-cv-00715-MHT

)

INTERSTATE ARMS CORP., et al., )

)

Defendants. )

NOTICE CONCERNING SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE AND MEDIATION

COMES NOW the plaintiff, BRIAN BONNER, and by and through undersigned 

counsel of record and files this Notice Concerning Settlement Conference and Mediation 

pursuant to Section 3 of this Court’s Uniform Scheduling Order dated July 12, 2007.

1. A face to face settlement conference took place between counsel for the Plaintiff 

and Defendants on June 26, 2008.

2. A settlement was not reached in this matter.

3. Neither counsel for the Plaintiff nor the Defendant feels that mediation will be 

able to assist the parties in resolving this matter short of a trial.

Respectfully submitted, 

/s/ David J. Hodge

DAVID J. HODGE

Of Counsel for Plaintiff

Case 3:06-cv-00715-MHT-TFM Document 97 Filed 07/01/2008 Page 1 of 2
2

OF COUNSEL:

PITTMAN, DUTTON, KIRBY & HELLUMS, P.C.

2001 Park Place North

1100 Park Place Tower

Birmingham, Alabama 35203

(205) 322-8880

(205) 328-2711 facsimile

Nick Wooten, Esq.

WOOTEN & CARLTON, P.C.

P.O. Drawer 290

Lafayette, Alabama 36862

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on 1

st day of July, 2008, I electronically filed the foregoing with 

the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing 

to the following: 

Todd M. Higey, Esq.

RICHARDSON CLEMENT, P.C.

200 Cahaba Park Circle, Suite 125

Birmingham, AL 35242

Attorney for Interstate Arms and Qiqihar Hawk

James C. Barton, Jr., Esq.

Alan D. Mathis, Esq.

JOHNSTON, BARTON, PROCTOR & POWELL, LLP

2900 Regions/Harbert Plaza

1901 6th Avenue North

Birmingham, AL 35203

Attorney for Norinco

/s/David J. Hodge _____

Of Counsel for Plaintiff

Case 3:06-cv-00715-MHT-TFM Document 97 Filed 07/01/2008 Page 2 of 2
Editorial Note on Part 982
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 982 appear at 61 FR 17559, Apr. 22, 1996.

§ 982.51 Restricted credit for ungraded inshell hazelnuts and for shelled hazelnuts. ( a ) A handler may withhold ungraded inshell hazelnuts in lieu of certified merchantable hazelnuts in satisfaction of that handler's restricted obligations, and the weight on which credit may be received shall be the shelled hazelnut equivalent weight as inspected by the Federal-State Inspection Service multiplied by 2.5. Any lot of ungraded hazelnuts not meeting the moisture requirements for certified merchantable hazelnuts shall not be eligible for credit. All determinations as to the shelled hazelnut equivalent weight shall be made by the Federal-State Inspection Service at the handler's expense. Hazelnuts so withheld shall be subject to the applicable requirements of § 982.50. The weight of all such lots for which a handler has received credit shall be adjusted by the Board when the lots are handled or disposed of so that the creditable weight is equal to the amount of certified merchantable inshell hazelnuts or certified shelled hazelnuts that are subsequently handled or disposed of from those lots. If this adjustment causes the handler to no longer be in satisfaction of that handler's restricted obligation as required by § 982.50, the deficiency shall be satisfied in the subsequent marketing year. If this adjustment results in a handler disposing of, in restricted outlets, a quantity in excess of that handler's restricted obligation, such excess shall not be credited to such handler's restricted obligation during the subsequent marketing year.
( b ) A handler may withhold, in accordance with § 982.50(a), certified shelled hazelnuts in lieu of merchantable hazelnuts in satisfaction of such handler's restricted obligation, subject to such terms and conditions as are recommended by the Board and established by the Secretary. The inshell equivalent of such hazelnuts shall be determined by multiplying the weight of the shelled hazelnuts by 2.5.
( c ) The Secretary upon recommendation of the Board and other available data may modify these procedures, change the conversion factors, and specify factors for conversion for different varieties of hazelnuts.
[51 FR 29548, Aug. 19, 1986, as amended at 61 FR 17560, Apr. 22, 1996]
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

Donna Dorsey Davis, ) 

as an individual and derivatively upon behalf ) 

of I-65 Properties, Inc. ) 

 ) 

 Plaintiff, ) 

 ) 

vs. ) CIVIL ACTION NO: 2:06cv766 

 ) 

Richard M. Dorsey, as an individual, ) 

and CD& O, LLC, as a necessary party, ) 

 ) 

 Defendant. ) 

 ) 

and ) 

 ) 

Richard M. Dorsey, ) 

Dorsey Motor Sales, Inc., ) 

and TD & O, Inc., ) 

 ) 

 Counter Plaintiffs, ) 

 ) 

vs. ) 

 ) 

Donna Dorsey Davis, ) 

 ) 

 Counter Defendant. ) 

Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant’s Exhibit List 

Comes now Plaintiff, by and through undersigned counsel, pursuant to the Court’s 

Scheduling Order and submits the following Exhibit List which may be used at the trial 

of this case: 

Case 2:06-cv-00766-MHT-TFM Document 47 Filed 06/13/2007 Page 1 of 3
2

ADMITTED DENIED 

__________ ________ 1. Certificate of Incorporation of I-65 Properties, Inc; 

__________ ________ 2. Name Reservation Certificate for I-65 Properties, 

 Inc.; 

__________ ________ 3. Articles of Incorporation of I-65 Properties, Inc. 

__________ ________ 4. By-laws of I-65 Properties, Inc. 

__________ ________ 5. Promissory note by Richard M. Dorsey, dated 

 10/1/1990; 

__________ ________ 6. Letter to Jack Davis from Alan Taunton, dated 

 2/17/2000; 

__________ ________ 7. Map of the Property of I-65 Properties, Inc.; 

__________ ________ 8. I-65 Properties expense spreadsheet; 

__________ ________ 9. Letter to Lindsay Erwin from Alan Taunton dated 

 2/3/2006; 

__________ ________ 10. Letter to Lindsay Erwin from Alan Taunton with 

 attached closing statement, warranty deed, and 

 promissory note; 

__________ ________ 11. Letter to Donna Davis from Dick Dorsey dated 

 1/17/2006; 

 Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant reserves the right to amend this Exhibit List at any 

time to add Exhibits which may be brought to light or for impeachment purposes of a 

witness. 

Respectfully Submitted this 13th day of June, 2007. 

//s// Lindsay B. Erwin 

 Lindsay B. Erwin 

 ASB-5299-Y59E 

 Attorney for Plaintiff 

Case 2:06-cv-00766-MHT-TFM Document 47 Filed 06/13/2007 Page 2 of 3
3

Meacham, Earley & Fowler, P.C. 

5704 Veterans Parkway 

Columbus, Georgia 31904 

(706) 576-4064 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

 I hereby certify that on the _13_ day of June, 2007, I electronically filed the 

foregoing with the Clerk of the Court using electronic filing system which will send 

information of such filing to the following: 

 Clifford W. Cleveland 

 Cleveland & Colley, P.C. 

 P.O. Box 680689 

 Prattville, AL 36068 

 James E. Roberts, Esquire 

 4908 Cahaba River Road, Suite 204 

 Birmingham, AL 35243 

 //s// Lindsay B. Erwin 

 OF COUNSEL 

 

Case 2:06-cv-00766-MHT-TFM Document 47 Filed 06/13/2007 Page 3 of 3
#### In the Matter of Harold Hall, Appellant, v William Phillips, Respondent.

Submitted November 5, 2007;

decided December 18, 2007

Reported below, 2007 NY Slip Op 70024(U).

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution.
156 So.2d 602

#### MAYFAIR SALES, INCORPORATED v. Oscar SAMS.

No. 46887.

Oct. 9, 1963.

In re: Mayfair Sales, Incorporated, applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of Livingston. 154 So.2d 616.

Writ denied. The result reached by the Court of Appeal is correct.
Part 5631 - CONTRACT COST PRINCIPLES

AND PROCEDURES

Subpart 5631.2 - CONTRACTS WITH COMMERCIAL ORGANIZATIONS

5631.205 Selected Costs.

5631.205-32 PreContract Costs.

5631.205-46 Travel Costs (Removed August 2017).

Subpart 5631.2 - CONTRACTS WITH COMMERCIAL

ORGANIZATIONS

5631.205 Selected Costs.

5631.205-32 PreContract Costs.

(Revised August 2017)

(a) Pre-Contract cost authorization shall be reviewed by legal counsel and approved by the cognizant

HCD or FCO before issuance. As a condition precedent to the use of a pre-contract cost agreement,

the correct type of funds must be available upon issuance of the pre-contract cost agreement.

Authorization must be in writing and shall address the following:

(i) The necessity for the contractor to initiate work prior to contract award

(ii) The start date of such contractor effort

(iii) The total estimated time of the advanced effort

(iv) The cost limitation

(b) Indicate on the Standard Form 26, Award/Contract, Block 15, and in Section G of any resultant

contract the date pre-contract costs were approved. This notifies the payment office that the precontract costs are allowable and that the contractor may be reimbursed. The effective date of the

contract shall be the date parties reach a bilateral agreement.

(c) Pre-contract cost authorization shall not be used to cover a period in excess of 30 days or

$100,000, unless a longer period/larger dollar threshold is approved by the HCA via a written

determination and findings that such an allowance is reasonable, and shall not be extended or

renewed.
(d) (Removed August 2017).

5631.205-46 Travel Costs (Removed August 2017).

HQ, United States Special Operations Command

Special Operations Forces Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics (SOF AT&L)

SOFARS 5631

February 2007
319.270-1 Mentor Protégé Program

Solicitation provision and contract clause.

(a) The contacting officer shall insert the provision at 352.219-70, Mentor-Protégé Program, in

solicitations that include the clause at FAR 52.219-9, Small Business Subcontracting Plan. The

provision requires offerors to provide the contracting officer a copy of their HHS Office of OSDBUapproved mentor-protégé agreement in response to a solicitation.

(b) The contacting officer shall insert the clause at 352.219-71, Mentor-Protégé Program Reporting

Requirements, in contracts that include the clause at FAR 52.219-9, Small Business Subcontracting

Plan, and which are awarded to a contractor with an HHS OSDBU-approved mentor-protégé

agreement.

Parent topic: Subpart 319.2 - Policies
§ 19.12 Instruction to workers. ( a ) All individuals who in the course of employment are likely to receive in a year an occupational dose in excess of 100 mrem (1 mSv) shall be— ( 1 ) Kept informed of the storage, transfer, or use of radiation and/or radioactive material;
( 2 ) Instructed in the health protection problems associated with exposure to radiation and/or radioactive material, in precautions or procedures to minimize exposure, and in the purposes and functions of protective devices employed;
( 3 ) Instructed in, and required to observe, to the extent within the workers control, the applicable provisions of Commission regulations and licenses for the protection of personnel from exposure to radiation and/or radioactive material;
( 4 ) Instructed of their responsibility to report promptly to the licensee any condition which may lead to or cause a violation of Commission regulations and licenses or unnecessary exposure to radiation and/or radioactive material;
( 5 ) Instructed in the appropriate response to warnings made in the event of any unusual occurrence or malfunction that may involve exposure to radiation and/or radioactive material; and
( 6 ) Advised as to the radiation exposure reports which workers may request pursuant to § 19.13.
( b ) In determining those individuals subject to the requirements of paragraph (a) of this section, licensees must take into consideration assigned activities during normal and abnormal situations involving exposure to radiation and/or radioactive material which can reasonably be expected to occur during the life of a licensed facility. The extent of these instructions must be commensurate with potential radiological health protection problems present in the work place.
[60 FR 36043, July 13, 1995]