alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case 2:06-cv-00702-MEF-TFM Document 37 Filed 09/11/2006 Page 1 of 8
Case 2:06-cv-00702-MEF-TFM Document 37 Filed 09/11/2006 Page 2 of 8
Case 2:06-cv-00702-MEF-TFM Document 37 Filed 09/11/2006 Page 3 of 8
Case 2:06-cv-00702-MEF-TFM Document 37 Filed 09/11/2006 Page 4 of 8
Case 2:06-cv-00702-MEF-TFM Document 37 Filed 09/11/2006 Page 5 of 8
Case 2:06-cv-00702-MEF-TFM Document 37 Filed 09/11/2006 Page 6 of 8
Case 2:06-cv-00702-MEF-TFM Document 37 Filed 09/11/2006 Page 7 of 8
Case 2:06-cv-00702-MEF-TFM Document 37 Filed 09/11/2006 Page 8 of 8
Case 2:06-cv-00702-MEF-TFM Document 37-2 Filed 09/11/2006 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:06-cv-00702-MEF-TFM Document 37-2 Filed 09/11/2006 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:06-cv-00702-MEF-TFM Document 37-2 Filed 09/11/2006 Page 3 of 3
Case 2:06-cv-00702-MEF-TFM Document 37-3 Filed 09/11/2006 Page 1 of 14
Case 2:06-cv-00702-MEF-TFM Document 37-3 Filed 09/11/2006 Page 2 of 14
Case 2:06-cv-00702-MEF-TFM Document 37-3 Filed 09/11/2006 Page 3 of 14
Case 2:06-cv-00702-MEF-TFM Document 37-3 Filed 09/11/2006 Page 4 of 14
Case 2:06-cv-00702-MEF-TFM Document 37-3 Filed 09/11/2006 Page 5 of 14
Case 2:06-cv-00702-MEF-TFM Document 37-3 Filed 09/11/2006 Page 6 of 14
Case 2:06-cv-00702-MEF-TFM Document 37-3 Filed 09/11/2006 Page 7 of 14
Case 2:06-cv-00702-MEF-TFM Document 37-3 Filed 09/11/2006 Page 8 of 14
Case 2:06-cv-00702-MEF-TFM Document 37-3 Filed 09/11/2006 Page 9 of 14
Case 2:06-cv-00702-MEF-TFM Document 37-3 Filed 09/11/2006 Page 10 of 14
Case 2:06-cv-00702-MEF-TFM Document 37-3 Filed 09/11/2006 Page 11 of 14
Case 2:06-cv-00702-MEF-TFM Document 37-3 Filed 09/11/2006 Page 12 of 14
Case 2:06-cv-00702-MEF-TFM Document 37-3 Filed 09/11/2006 Page 13 of 14
Case 2:06-cv-00702-MEF-TFM Document 37-3 Filed 09/11/2006 Page 14 of 14
Case 2:06-cv-00702-MEF-TFM Document 37-4 Filed 09/11/2006 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:06-cv-00702-MEF-TFM Document 37-4 Filed 09/11/2006 Page 2 of 2
Case 2:06-cv-00702-MEF-TFM Document 37-5 Filed 09/11/2006 Page 1 of 1
###### Editorial Note on Part 1045

#### Editorial Notes:Nomenclature changes to part 1045 appear at 88 FR 41294, June 26, 2023, and 88 FR 82238, Nov. 24, 2023.

§ 1045.10 To whom does this part apply?

Editorial Notes:

Nomenclature changes to part 1045 appear at 88 FR 41294, June 26, 2023, and 88 FR 82238, Nov. 24, 2023.

(a) Subparts A, B, C, and D apply to—

(1) Any person or agency with access to RD, FRD, or TFNI;

(2) Any person or agency who generates information that has the potential to be RD, FRD, or TFNI; and

(3) Any person or agency who generates matter that potentially contains RD, FRD, or TFNI.

(b) Subpart E applies to government agencies who receive Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) or Mandatory Declassification Review (MDR) requests for matter that is marked as or potentially contains RD, FRD, or TFNI.

(c) Subpart F applies to DOE and to any person submitting a Mandatory Declassification Review request for DOE matter.
#### Nicole BRADLEY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Gloria HENRY, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 04-15919.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Dec. 15, 2005.

Dennis P. Riordan, Esq., Riordan & Horgan, San Francisco, CA, for Petitioner-Appellant.

*939Morris Beatus, Esq., Bridget Billeter, Esq., AGCA-Office of the California Attorney General, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent-Appellee.

Before SCHROEDER, Chief Judge.

ORDER

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.
<PAGE>


                                                                   EXHIBIT 32.1


                  Certification of Chief Executive Officer and
                   Acting Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to
                             18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                             as Adopted Pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

This certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 and accompanies the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB (the "FORM 10-QSB")
for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 of Universal Detection Technology (the
"ISSUER").

I, Jacques Tizabi, the Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial
Officer of Issuer certify that, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my
knowledge:

     (i)  the Form 10-QSB fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
          or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (ii) the information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Issuer.

Date: November 22, 2004


                                          /s/ Jacques Tizabi
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Name: Jacques Tizabi


                                       32
EX-33 (c)
REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE

First American Real Estate Solutions of Texas, L.P. (an indirect subsidiary of
The First American Corporation, and the "Asserting Party") is responsible for
assessing compliance as of December 31, 2006, and for the period from January 1,
2006 through December 31, 2006 (the "Reporting Period") with the servicing
criteria set forth in Title 17, Sections 229.1122(d)(1)(iv), (d)(2)(v),
(d)(2)(vi), (d)(2)(vii), (d)(4)(xi), (d)(4)(xii) and (d)(4)(xiii) of the Code of
Federal Regulations (the "CFR") applicable to the Asserting Party (the
"Applicable Servicing Criteria"). The transactions covered by this report
include all loans for residential mortgage loan outsourcing customers for which
the Asserting Party served as the residential tax service provider (the
"Platform").

The Asserting Party has assessed its compliance with the Applicable Servicing
Criteria for the Reporting Period and has concluded that, except as set forth
hereinbelow, the Asserting Party has complied, in all material respects, with
the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2006, and for the Reporting
Period with respect to the Platform taken as a whole.

The Asserting Party assessed its compliance with the Applicable Servicing
Criteria for the Reporting Period and has identified a material instance of
noncompliance with the servicing criterion set forth in Section
229.1122(d)(2)(vii)(B) of the CFR with respect to the Platform. Specifically,
the Asserting Party did not prepare reconciliations for all asset-backed
securities related bank accounts within 30 calendar days after the bank
statement cut-off date or such number of days specified in the transaction
agreements.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm,
has issued an attestation report on the assessment of compliance with the
Applicable Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2006, and for the Reporting
Period as set forth in this assertion.


FIRST AMERICAN REAL ESTATE SOLUTIONS OF TEXAS, L.P.
By: First American Real Estate Solutions LLC
General Partner

/s/ Lucy A. Przybyla
Lucy A. Przybyla
Senior Vice President
February 28, 2007
#### McCORMICK, Respondent, v. TYLER, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

July 10, 1914.)

Action by William P. McCormick against Frank J. Tyler, as sole executor, etc.

R. Krause, of New York City, for appellant.

D. Weinstein, of New York City, for respondent.

No opinion. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements, with leave to. defendant to serve amended answer on payment of costs in this court and in the court below, on the authority of Scheibeler v. Albee, 114 App. Div. 146, 99 N. Y. Supp. 706. Order filed. See, also, 147 N. Y. Supp. 1124.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                          5
<MULTIPLIER>                       1,000

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                            6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                             JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  104,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               112,000
<PP&E>                                       5,373,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,698,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,787,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        3,909,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       578,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  (1,750,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,787,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  457,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             103,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (538,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (538,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (538,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.01)



</TABLE>
#### § 1708.107 Powers of persons conducting formal safety investigations.

The Investigating Officer(s) appointed by the Board may take informal or formal statements, interview witnesses, take testimony, request production of documents, recommend issuance of subpoenas, recommend taking of testimony in a closed forum, recommend administration of oaths, and otherwise perform any lawful act authorized under the Board's enabling legislation in connection with any safety investigation ordered by the Board.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 274 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 274

  Recognizing Miguel Contreras, on the occasion of his death, for his 
       tireless work on behalf of immigrants and working people.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 11, 2005

   Ms. Linda T. Sanchez of California (for herself, Ms. Solis, Mrs. 
   Napolitano, Mr. Grijalva, Ms. Loretta Sanchez of California, Mr. 
  Becerra, Ms. Roybal-Allard, Ms. Harman, Mr. Baca, Mr. Sherman, Ms. 
     Watson, Mr. Berman, Mr. Honda, Mr. Waxman, Ms. Zoe Lofgren of 
    California, Mr. Filner, and Mrs. Capps) submitted the following 
  resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Recognizing Miguel Contreras, on the occasion of his death, for his 
       tireless work on behalf of immigrants and working people.

Whereas Miguel Contreras, as Secretary and Treasurer of the Los Angeles County 
        Federation of Labor, reenergized the labor movement in the Los Angeles 
        area by bringing unions and workers together across craft, class, and 
        income divisions;
Whereas Contreras gave special pride to Latino workers and fought tirelessly for 
        the rights of immigrants;
Whereas Contreras gave voice to all working people in Los Angeles;
Whereas Contreras rebuilt the progressive political coalition in Los Angeles by 
        building bridges across various communities, including Latino, African-
        American, Asian-Pacific American, and Native American communities;
Whereas Contreras began his life working in the fields of Southern California 
        alongside his immigrant parents and ended it fighting along side working 
        families as one of the highest ranking and most influential labor 
        leaders in the United States; and
Whereas the example set by Miguel Contreras and the lessons he taught reach far 
        beyond the borders of California, and they will endure as long as men 
        and women struggle for justice: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) has learned with profound sorrow of the death of Miguel 
        Contreras on May 6, 2005, and extends condolences to his 
        family;
            (2) expresses its deep gratitude to Miguel Contreras for 
        working tirelessly on behalf of immigrants and working people; 
        and
            (3) recognizes Miguel Contreras as a role model for 
        generations to come in California and throughout the entire 
        Nation.
                                 <all>
```
§ 20.1404 Alternate criteria for license termination. ( a ) The Commission may terminate a license using alternate criteria greater than the dose criterion of §§ 20.1402, 20.1403(b), and 20.1403(d)(1)(i)(A), if the licensee— ( 1 ) Provides assurance that public health and safety would continue to be protected, and that it is unlikely that the dose from all man-made sources combined, other than medical, would be more than the 1 mSv/y (100 mrem/y) limit of subpart D, by submitting an analysis of possible sources of exposure;
( 2 ) Has employed to the extent practical restrictions on site use according to the provisions of § 20.1403 in minimizing exposures at the site; and
( 3 ) Reduces doses to ALARA levels, taking into consideration any detriments such as traffic accidents expected to potentially result from decontamination and waste disposal.
( 4 ) Has submitted a decommissioning plan or License Termination Plan (LTP) to the Commission indicating the licensee's intent to decommission in accordance with §§ 30.36(d), 40.42(d), 50.82 (a) and (b), 70.38(d), or 72.54 of this chapter, and specifying that the licensee proposes to decommission by use of alternate criteria. The licensee shall document in the decommissioning plan or LTP how the advice of individuals and institutions in the community who may be affected by the decommissioning has been sought and addressed, as appropriate, following analysis of that advice. In seeking such advice, the licensee shall provide for: ( i ) Participation by representatives of a broad cross section of community interests who may be affected by the decommissioning;
( ii ) An opportunity for a comprehensive, collective discussion on the issues by the participants represented; and
( iii ) A publicly available summary of the results of all such discussions, including a description of the individual viewpoints of the participants on the issues and the extent of agreement and disagreement on the issues.
( 5 ) Has provided sufficient financial assurance in the form of a trust fund to enable an independent third party, including a governmental custodian of a site, to assume and carry out responsibilities for any necessary control and maintenance of the site.
( b ) The use of alternate criteria to terminate a license requires the approval of the Commission after consideration of the NRC staff's recommendations that will address any comments provided by the Environmental Protection Agency and any public comments submitted pursuant to § 20.1405.
[62 FR 39088, July 21, 1997, as amended at 76 FR 35564, July 17, 2011]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE MARCH
31, 1997 FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           4,637
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     21,873
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          10,809
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            10,826
<LOANS>                                         88,142
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,008
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 128,000
<DEPOSITS>                                     109,166
<SHORT-TERM>                                     1,573
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                952
<LONG-TERM>                                      1,124
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,500
<OTHER-SE>                                      13,685
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 128,000
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  1,986
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  517
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     2
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 2,505
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                 916
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 960
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            1,545
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       60
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  1,020
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    624
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         624
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       399
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .58
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .58
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    5.20
<LOANS-NON>                                        282
<LOANS-PAST>                                        33
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   990
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       46
<RECOVERIES>                                         4
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,008
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,008
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            100
        

</TABLE>
Editorial Note on Part 26
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 26 appear at 87 FR 71455, Nov. 22, 2022.

§ 26.8 Information collection requirements: OMB approval. ( a ) The NRC has submitted the information collection requirements contained in this part for approval by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 *et seq.*). The NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. OMB has approved the information collection requirements contained in this part under control number 3150-0146.
( b ) The approved information collection requirements contained in this part appear in §§ 26.9, 26.27, 26.29, 26.31, 26.33, 26.35, 26.37, 26.39, 26.41, 26.53, 26.55, 26.57, 26.59, 26.61, 26.63, 26.65, 26.67, 26.69, 26.75, 26.77, 26.85, 26.87, 26.89, 26.91, 26.93, 26.95, 26.97, 26.99, 26.101, 26.103, 26.107, 26.109, 26.111, 26.113, 26.115, 26.117, 26.119, 26.125, 26.127, 26.129, 26.135, 26.137, 26.139, 26.153, 26.157, 26.159, 26.163, 26.165, 26.167, 26.168, 26.169, 26.183, 26.185, 26.187, 26.189, 26.203, 26.205, 26.207, 26.211, 26.401, 26.403, 26.405, 26.406, 26.407, 26.411, 26.413, 26.415, 26.417, 26.711, 26.713, 26.715, 26.717, 26.719, and 26.821.
[73 FR 17176, Mar. 31, 2008, as amended at 87 FR 71456, Nov. 22, 2022]
#### § 1041.111 Notice.

The agency shall make available to employees, applicants, participants, beneficiaries, and other interested persons such information regarding the provisions of this part and its applicability to the programs or activities conducted by the agency, and make such information available to them in such manner as the head of the agency finds necessary to apprise such persons of the protections against discrimination assured them by section 504 and this regulation.
#### In the Matter of Jack Minkoff et al., Appellants, v County of Nassau et al., Respondents, et al., Respondents.

[815 NYS2d 475]

In a proceeding, inter alia, pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of mandamus to compel the County of Nassau, Board of Assessors of Nassau County, and Nassau County Assessment Review Commission to limit the increase in assessments of class one real property as reflected on the April 1, 2003 final assessment roll so that the increases comply with RPTL 1805 (1), the petitioners appeal from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Winslow, J.), dated December 4, 2003, which denied their motion for recusal, and (2) a judgment of the same court dated December 9, 2003 which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the appeal from the order is dismissed; and it is further,

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed; and it is further,

Ordered that one bill of costs is awarded to the respondents-respondents.

The appeal from the intermediate order must be dismissed because an order made in a CPLR article 78 proceeding is not appealable as of right *(see*CPLR 5701 [b] [1]) and, in any event, the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with the entry of final judgment in the proceeding *(see Matter of Aho,*39 NY2d 241, 248 [1976]). The issues raised on appeal from the order are brought up for review and have been considered on the appeal from the judgment *(see*CPLR 5501 [a] [1]).

The court providently exercised its discretion in denying the petitioners’ motion for recusal *(see Matter of Briffel v County of Nassau,*31 AD3d 79 [2006] [decided herewith]; *Matter of Borrell v Hanophy,*246 AD2d 647 [1998]; *Berman v Herbert Color Lithographers Corp.,*222 AD2d 640 [1995]).

The court properly determined that the County of Nassau, Board of Assessors of Nassau County, and Nassau County Assessment Review Commission complied with the limitations set forth in RPTL 1805 as applied to the petitioners’ respective properties *(see Matter of Briffel v County of Nassau, supra).*

The petitioners’ remaining contentions are without merit. Florio, J.P., Krausman and Mastro, JJ., concur.

Spolzino and Lifson, JJ.

dissent, in part, and vote to dismiss the appeal from the order, reverse the judgment, grant the petition to the extent of remitting the matter to the Supreme Court, Nassau County, for the entry of a judgment directing the respondents-respondents to reduce those assessments that fail *1001to comply with RPTL 1805 (1), otherwise deny the petition, and deny the motion for the reasons stated in their dissents in *Matter of Briffel v County of Nassau,*31 AD3d 79, 86, 97 [2006], Spolzino and Lifson, JJ., dissenting] [decided herewith]).