alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# United States Court of Appeals

**for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

November 13 , 2014

ERRATA

______________________

Appeal No. 2013

- 7124

JOAN C. DEBORD

v.

ROBERT A. MCDONALD,

Secretary of Veterans Affairs

De cided: November 12, 2014

Nonprec edential Opinion

______________________

Please make the following change:

P age 2, line 13, add

-- P ER C URIAM (D YK

, W ALLACH

, and

H UGHES

, Circuit Jud g es ).--
exv10w1






Exhibit 10.1




ANALOG DEVICES, INC.




Amendment No. 4 to the 2006 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended


The 2006 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended by Amendment No. 1, Amendment No. 2 and Amendment No. 3
thereto (the “Plan”) of Analog Devices, Inc. (the “Corporation”), is hereby amended as set forth
below:





That Section 8(c) of the Plan is amended by adding the phrase “or, in the discretion of the
Board, when the granting of such Restricted Stock Units in any foreign jurisdiction is
delayed in connection with registration or approval to be obtained in connection with such
Restricted Stock Units” after the phrase “or retirement of the Participant”.



     Except to the extent amended hereby, all of the terms, provisions and conditions set forth in
the Plan are hereby ratified and confirmed and shall remain in full force and effect. The Plan and
this amendment shall be read and construed together as a single instrument.



Approved by the Board of Directors on December 1, 2009
Amendment to Deferred Compensation Plan, effective 4/1/2009



 Exhibit 10.S(9) 
 AMENDMENT TO THE 
 ALCOA DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN

 Pursuant to Article 10 of the Plan, the Plan is amended as follows: 
  

	1.	Section 4.1, is amended to add the following new paragraph: 

 Effective April 1, 2009, no Matching Company Credits will be deemed to be credited to any Participant account under this
Plan. 
  

	2.	In all other respects the Plan is hereby ratified and confirmed. 

  

 1
Exhibit 34.4b



LOGO

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Tothe Board of Directors of Assurant Inc.:

We have
examined managements assertion, included in the accompanying Report on Assessment of Compliance with §1122(d)(2)(vi), §1122(d)(4)(xi) and §1122(d)(4)(xii) of Regulation AB Servicing Criteria, that American Security Insurance
Company, Standard Guaranty Insurance Company and TrackSure Insurance Agency, Inc. (affiliates of Assurant, Inc., collectively the Company) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange
Commissions Regulation AB for the insurance escrow servicing activities it performs with respect to all mortgage backed securities transactions that were registered after January 1, 2006 with the Securities and Exchange Commission
pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933 (the Platform), as of December 31, 2016 and for the year then ended,excluding criteria §1122(d)(1)(i) through §1122(d)(1)(v), §1122(d)(2)(i) through §1122(d)(2)(v),
§1122(d)(2)(vii), §1122(d)(3)(i) through §1122(d)(3)(iv), §1122(d)(4)(i) through §1122(d)(4)(x) and §1122(d)(4)(xiii) through §1122(d)(4)(xv), which the Company has determined are not applicable to the activities
performed by it with respect to the Platform. Management is responsible for the Companys compliance with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on managements assertion based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly,
included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Companys compliance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of
selected servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company performed those selected activities in compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our procedures were limited to the servicing activities performed by
the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to detect noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurred prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated
or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Companys compliance with the
servicing criteria.

In our opinion, managements assertion that American Security Insurance Company, Standard Guaranty Insurance Company,
and TrackSure Insurance Agency, Inc. complied with the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016 for the Platform is fairly stated, in all material respects.



LOGO

February 15, 2017





PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, 1075 Peachtree Street,
Atlanta, GA 30309-3851

T: (678) 419 1000, www.pwc.com/us
Exhibit 10.23



 Exihibit 10.23 
 INDEMNIFICATION AND GUARANTEE AGREEMENT 
 This Indemnification Agreement (the “Agreement”) is made as of the 12th day of February, 2010 by and between Mr. Chen Ping (“Mr. Chen”) and Beijing Dehaier Technology Company Limited (“BTL”). 
 WHEREAS, on May 5, 2009, Beijing Dehaier Medical Technology Company Limited (“BDL”) entered into a loan agreement (the
“Loan”) with the Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited (Hai Dian Branch) (“ICBC”). 
 WHEREAS, on
May 5, 2009, Mr. Chen and ICBC entered into a Guarantee Contract (the “Guarantee”), whereby Mr. Chen agreed to personally guarantee the obligations of BDL under the Loan, should BDL ever fail to repay the Loan on time.

 WHEREAS, since the time of the Loan and Guarantee, Mr. Chen and BTL have agreed that should BDL ever default upon its
obligations under the Loan, requiring Mr. Chen to perform under the Guarantee, BTL will indemnify Mr. Chen against any loss under the Guarantee and that BTL will guarantee Mr. Chen’s performance thereunder. 
 WHEREAS, Mr. Chen and BTL have agreed to ratify the terms of their verbal agreement and reduce those terms to a writing. 
 NOW THEREFORE, intending to bound hereby, the Parties agree as follows: 
 1. BTL shall reimburse Mr. Chen and shall indemnify and hold Mr. Chen harmless from and against any loss, cost, expense, liability
or damage Mr. Chen incurs in connection with his payment of amounts which come due and are paid by Mr. Chen under the Guarantee. 
 2. BTL shall guarantee Mr. Chen’s performance under the Loan as the Guarantor thereunder. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the date first above written. 
  


			
	MR. CHEN PING
	
	 /s/ Chen Ping

	
	 BEIJING DEHAIER TECHNOLOGY COMPANY LIMITED

		
	By:	 	 /s/ Chen Ping

	Name:	 	Chen Ping
	Its:	 	Authorized Person
#### § 900.405 Ballots.

The referendum agent and his appointees shall accept all ballots cast; but, should they, or any of them, deem that a ballot should be challenged for any reason, said agent or appointee shall endorse above his signature, on said ballot, a statement to the effect that such ballot was challenged, by whom challenged, the reasons therefor, the results of any investigations made with respect thereto, and the disposition thereof. Invalid ballots shall not be counted.
Subpart 1902.1 - Definitions    **Parent topic:** PART 1902 - DEFINITIONS OF WORDS AND TERMS1902.101 Definitions.       As used throughout this regulation, the following words and terms are used as defined in this subpart unless (a) the context in which they are used clearly requires a different meaning or (b) a different definition is prescribed for a particular part or portion of a part.          *Board* means the Broadcasting Board of Governors, acting through any of its duty authorized officials.          *Board Procurement Executive* means the Director, Office of Contracts.          *AR/CO* means Authorized Representative of the Contracting Officer (see 1942.202-70).          *Contracting activity* means the Office of Contracts, which has the responsibility to contract for the acquisition of supplies and services (including construction).          *Head of the Board* (also called *Board head*) means the Board Director or Deputy Director; and the term *authorized representative* means any person, persons or board (other than the contracting officer) authorized to act for the Head of the Board.          *Purchasing Activity* means an office with one or more Level I or Level II Small Purchases Contracting Officer(s) exercising limited redelegations of contracting officer authority.          *BBG* means the Broadcating Board of Governors.
IV 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 372 

Increasing the amount provided for the Members’ Representational Allowance 

of a Member of the House of Representatives who employs a veteran 

with a service-connected disability. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 20, 2005 

Mr. ROHRABACHER submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 

the Committee on House Administration 

RESOLUTION 

Increasing the amount provided for the Members’ Representational Allowance of a Member of the House of Representatives who employs a veteran with a service-connected disability. 

1 Resolved, 

2 SECTION 1. INCREASE IN MEMBERS’ REPRESENTATIONAL 

3 ALLOWANCE FOR MEMBERS HIRING DIS4 ABLED VETERANS. 

5 (a) INCREASE IN ALLOWANCE.—The amount other6 wise provided during a year for the Members’ Representa7 tional Allowance of a Member of the House of Representa8 tives (including a Delegate or Resident Commissioner to 
2 

•HRES 372 IH 

1 the Congress) shall be increased by $50,000 if at any time 

2 during the year a qualified disabled veteran is an employee 

3 of the Member’s office whose salary is paid from such Al4 lowance. 

5 (b) QUALIFIED DISABLED VETERAN DEFINED.—In 

6 this section, a ‘‘qualified disabled veteran’’ is an individual 

7 who is a veteran with a service-connected disability (as 

8 such terms are defined in section 101 of title 38, United 

9 States Code) whose level of disability is not less than 30 

10 percent, as certified by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs. 

Æ
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000764579
<NAME> CAS MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           2,229,819
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      672,894
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                        797,252
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,844,947
<PP&E>                                           1,016,256
<DEPRECIATION>                                     852,435
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   4,024,467
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              758,292
<BONDS>                                                  0
<COMMON>                                            37,317
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<OTHER-SE>                                         531,494
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     4,024,467
<SALES>                                          4,646,181
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,848,124
<CGS>                                            2,008,707
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,843,427
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   375,528
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (59,819)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    680,281
<INCOME-TAX>                                       272,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                408,281
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                       408,281
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          .04
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          .04
        

</TABLE>
§ 948.131 Federal-State inspection reports. Each application for exemption shall be accompanied by a written report of a Federal-State Inspector, which shall contain the following: ( a ) A statement by the inspector that he personally inspected the potatoes with respect to which exemption is requested, and that he took a representative sample of such potatoes;
( b ) A statement of the percentage of the potatoes (excluding culls) which fail to meet the requirements of the grade and size regulations then in effect;
( c ) A statement of the defects or damage causing the potatoes to fail to meet grade and size requirements then in effect.
In the event that more than one variety of potatoes is being regulated the above percentage shall be determined separately for each variety of the applicant's potatoes. The cost of Federal-State inspection and report shall be borne by the applicant for exemption.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 178 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 178

                  Honoring the life of Betty Shabazz.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 17, 2005

 Mr. Rangel submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                   the Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
                  Honoring the life of Betty Shabazz.

Whereas the Nation honors Betty Shabazz as a wife, mother, educator, and 
        advocate for civil and human rights, women, and the poor;
Whereas Betty Shabazz, through her life and deeds, has been an inspiration to 
        people around the world;
Whereas Betty Shabazz was a woman of strength, resilience, perseverance, and 
        grace who overcame the greatest of challenges;
Whereas Betty Shabazz was born Betty Sanders in Detroit, Michigan, on May 28, 
        1936;
Whereas Betty Shabazz met and married the controversial activist and leader El-
        Hajj Malik El-Shabazz (Malcolm X) in New York in 1958;
Whereas on February 21, 1965, while pregnant with twins, Betty Shabazz and their 
        four daughters witnessed Malcolm X's assassination;
Whereas Betty Shabazz exhibited her resiliency and determination as a single 
        mother, raising and educating her six daughters, Attallah, Qubilah, 
        Ilyasah, Gamilah, and twins Malikah and Malaak;
Whereas Betty Shabazz found the time to become certified as a registered nurse, 
        and to later earn bachelor's and master's degrees and, finally, a 
        doctorate in education administration from the University of 
        Massachusetts;
Whereas Betty Shabazz joined the administrative staff of Medgar Evers College in 
        Brooklyn, New York, rising to high positions;
Whereas, while preserving the public memory of her late husband, Betty Shabazz 
        earned a reputation of her own, as an educator, public speaker, and 
        advocate for women, education, and civil and human rights;
Whereas on June 23, 1997, Betty Shabazz succumbed to injuries suffered in a 
        tragic fire;
Whereas Betty Shabazz personified the roles of wife, mother, and professional 
        woman; and
Whereas Betty Shabazz will be forever remembered for her love of family, her 
        commitment to humankind, and for the joy and laughter she brought to all 
        those who knew her: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives honors the life of 
Betty Shabazz.
                                 <all>
```
§ 1703.103 Requests for agency records available through the electronic reading room. ( a ) The DNFSB will maintain an electronic reading room on its public Web site at *https://www.dnfsb.gov*/*foia-reading-room*. Records may be obtained by accessing and downloading them from the electronic reading room. The electronic reading room is intended to provide easy accessibility to a substantial collection of the agency's records. The agency considers the records available through its electronic reading room to have been placed in the public domain.
( b ) The public records of the agency that are available in the electronic reading room or through links from the electronic reading room include: ( 1 ) The Board's rules and regulations;
( 2 ) Statements of policy adopted by the Board.
( 3 ) Board recommendations; the Secretary of Energy's response, any final decision, and implementation plans regarding Board recommendations; and interested person's comments, data, views, or arguments to the Board concerning its recommendations and the Secretary of Energy's response and final decision;
( 4 ) Transcripts of public hearings and any Board correspondence related thereto;
( 5 ) Recordings or transcripts of Board meetings that were closed under 10 CFR part 1704, where the Board subsequently determines under 10 CFR 1704.9 that the recordings or transcripts may be made publicly available;
( 6 ) Board orders, decisions, notices, and other actions in a public hearing;
( 7 ) Board correspondence, except that which is exempt from mandatory public disclosure under § 1703.104;
( 8 ) Copies of the filings, certifications, pleadings, records, briefs, orders, judgments, decrees, and mandates in court proceedings to which the Board is a party and the correspondence with the courts or clerks of court;
( 9 ) Those of the Board's Administrative Directives that affect members of the public;
( 10 ) Index of the documents identified in this section, but not including drafts thereof; and
( 11 ) Annual reports to Congress in which the Board's operations during a past fiscal year are described.
( 12 ) Copies of records released pursuant to FOIA requests, along with an index to these records. The format will generally be the same as the format of the released records.
[56 FR 21261, May 8, 1991, as amended at 62 FR 66815, Dec. 22, 1997; 82 FR 30723, July 3, 2017]
Case 2:06-cv-00767-MEF-SRW Document 17 Filed 11/02/2006 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:06-cv-00767-MEF-SRW Document 17 Filed 11/02/2006 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:06-cv-00767-MEF-SRW Document 17 Filed 11/02/2006 Page 3 of 3
2007-1822.

#### Fifth Third Bank v. Lorance.

Butler App. No. CA2006-10-280, 2007-Ohio-4217. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal. Upon consideration of appellant’s application for dismissal,

It is ordered by the court that the application for dismissal is granted. Accordingly, this cause is dismissed.
#### Frank Vaccaro, as Father and Natural Guardian of Anna M. Vaccaro, et al., Respondents, v Boulevard Hospital, Appellant, et al., Defendant.

In a medical malpractice action, the defendant hospital appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated June 20, 1979, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the derivative causes of action asserted by the infant plaintiffs parents. The appeal brings up for review so much of a further order of the same court, dated October 2, 1979, as, upon reargument, adhered to the original determination. Appeal from the order dated June 20, 1979 dismissed as academic. That order was superseded by the order granting reargument. Order dated October 2, 1979, affirmed insofar as reviewed. No opinion. Plaintiffs are awarded one bill of $50 costs and disbursements. Mollen, P. J., Titone, Martuscello and O’Con-nor, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 4.3

             Agreement to Furnish Copy of Third Amendment

                              May 6, 1997


     Pursuant to  Item 601(b)(4)(3)(A) of Regulation  S-K, the Company
hereby  agrees to furnish  to the Securities  and Exchange Commission,
upon  request, a  copy of the  Third Amendment,  dated as  of March 1,
1997, to  the Note  Agreement, dated May  1, 1991, with  The Minnesota
Mutual Life Insurance Company and others.


                              WLR FOODS, INC.

                              By:_/s/ Robert T. Ritter________
                                   ROBERT T. RITTER

                              Its: Chief Financial Officer
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, September 27, 2017.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, September 27, 2017

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A18D0082. DUNWOODY PLAZA PARTNERS, LLC et al. v. JAY MARKOWITZ.

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby GRANTED. The Appellant may file a Notice of Appeal within 10 days of the date of 

this order. The Clerk of State Court is directed to include a copy of this order in the record 

transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

LC NUMBERS:

16A61705
#### Whitaker Farmers Grain Company, Appellee, v. Joseph Soucie, Appellant.

Gen. No. 9,553.

opinion filed June 28, 1940.

Arch F. Nuttall, for appellant; Savage & Holbrook and Charles J. McKeown, for appellee.

Opinion by

Presiding Justice Wolfe.

‘ ‘Not to be published in full.”
§ 15.61 Prompt referral. ( a ) The NRC shall promptly refer debts that are subject to aggressive collection activity (as described in subpart B of this part) and that cannot be compromised, or debts on which collection activity cannot be suspended or terminated, to DOJ for litigation. Debts for which the principal amount exceeds $1,000,000, or such other amount as the Attorney General may direct, exclusive of interest and penalties, must be referred to the Civil Division or other division responsible for litigating such debts at DOJ, Washington, DC. Debts for which the principal amount is $1,000,000 or less, or such other amount as the Attorney General may direct, exclusive of interest or penalties, must be referred to the DOJ's Nationwide Central Intake Facility, as required by the CCLR instructions. Debts will be referred as early as possible, consistent with the NRC's aggressive collection activity and well within the one year of the NRC's final determination of the fact and the amount of the debt.
( b ) DOJ has exclusive jurisdiction over the debts referred to in paragraph (a) of this section. The NRC shall terminate the use of any administrative collection activities to collect a debt when the debt is referred to DOJ. The NRC shall advise the DOJ of the collection activities it used and the results. The NRC shall refrain from having any contact with the debtor and shall direct all inquiries to DOJ. The NRC shall immediately notify DOJ of any payments credited to the debtor's account after the account has been referred to DOJ. DOJ shall notify NRC in a timely manner of any payments it receives from the debtor.
[67 FR 30324, May 6, 2002]
###### Editorial Note on Part 4

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 4 appear at 77 FR 39904, July 6, 2012.

#### § 4.337 Hearings, decisions, post-termination proceedings.

Certain NRC procedural provisions applicable to title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 apply to NRC enforcement of these regulations. They are §§ 4.61 through 4.64 and §§ 4.71 through 4.75.