alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 21-1461V

UNPUBLISHED

CHARLES WALTER,

Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES,

 Respondent.

Chief Special Master Corcoran 

Filed: June 24, 2022

Special Processing Unit (SPU); 

Ruling on Entitlement; Concession;

Table Injury; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine;

Guillain-Barre Syndrome (GBS)

Ronald Craig Homer, Conway, Homer, P.C., Boston, MA, for Petitioner.

Emily H. Manoso, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1

On June 11, 2021, Charles Walter filed a petition for compensation under the 

National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.2(the 

“Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that he suffered Guillain-Barré Syndrome (“GBS”), a

defined Table Injury, after receiving an influenza vaccine on August 22, 2018. Petition at

1, ¶ 2. Petitioner further alleges that he received the vaccination in the United States, 

that he suffered the residual effects of his GBS for more than six months and that neither 

he nor any other party has filed a civil action or received compensation for her GBS, 

alleged as vaccine caused. Id. at ¶¶ 25-27. The case was assigned to the Special 

Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

1 Because this unpublished Ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required 

to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E-Government Act 

of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government 

Services). This means the Ruling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance 

with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, 

the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that 

the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access. 

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease 

of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 

300aa (2012).

CORRECTED
2

On June 23, 2022, Respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes that 

Petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at 1.

Specifically, Respondent has concluded “that [P]etitioner has satisfied the criteria set forth 

in the Vaccine Injury Table (“Table”) and the Qualifications and Aids to Interpretation

(“QAI”).” Id. at 6. 

In view of Respondent’s position and the evidence of record, I find that 

Petitioner is entitled to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Brian H. Corcoran

Brian H. Corcoran

Chief Special Master
Searched for **http://bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/dcprea03.pdf**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **http://bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/dcprea03.pdf**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-13-00148-CV

SHA, LLC D/B/A FIRSTCARE,

Appellant

v.

FIDELITY BENEFITS & INSURANCE

SERVICES, LLLP,

Appellee

From the 414th District Court

McLennan County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2009-891-5

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The parties have filed an “Agreed Motion to Remand,” which states that they 

have reached a mediated resolution of all issues in this case and have since 

implemented their agreement. The parties ask us to set aside the judgment entered in 

this case without regard to the merits and remand the case to the trial court for further 

proceedings consistent with the parties’ resolution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2)(B). The 

parties further state that we may tax costs against the party incurring same.
SHA, LLC v. Fidelity Benefits & Ins. Servs., LLLP Page 2

The agreed motion is granted. Accordingly, we set aside the trial court’s 

judgment without regard to the merits and remand the case to the trial court for further 

proceedings in accordance with the parties’ agreement. Costs of this appeal are taxed 

against the party incurring same. 

 REX D. DAVIS

Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and 

Justice Scoggins

Motion granted; judgment set aside; cause remanded

Opinion delivered and filed August 15, 2013

[CV06]
§ 110.62 Order to show cause. ( a ) In response to an alleged violation, described in § 110.60, the Commission may institute a proceeding to revoke, suspend, or modify a license by issuing an order to show cause: ( 1 ) Stating the alleged violation and proposed enforcement action; and
( 2 ) Informing the licensee of his right, within 20 days or other specified time, to file a written answer and demand a hearing.
( b ) An answer consenting to the proposed enforcement action shall constitute a waiver by the licensee of a hearing and of all rights to seek further Commission or judicial review.
( c ) The order to show cause may be omitted and an order issued to revoke, suspend, or modify the license in cases where the Commission determines that the violation is willful or that the public health, safety, or interest so requires.
#### PEOPLE, Respondent, v. MARKUS, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

March 3, 1915.)

Proceeding by the People of the State of New York against Jacob Markus.

No opinion. Appeal dismissed, unless appellant file and serve printed briefs by March 9th.
#### § 205.352 Information to be reported.

The emergency situation data shall be supplied to the DOE Emergency Operations Center in accordance with the current DOE pamphlet on reporting procedures. The initial report shall include the utility name; the area affected; the time of occurrence of the initiating event; the duration or an estimate of the likely duration; an estimate of the number of customers and amount of load involved; and whether any known critical services such as hospitals, military installations, pumping stations or air traffic control systems, were or are interrupted. To the extent known or reasonably suspected, the report shall include a description of the events initiating the disturbance. The DOE may require further clarification during or after restoration of service.

(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1901-0288)
Editorial Note on Part 32
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 32 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

§ 32.19 Same: Conditions of licenses. Each license issued under § 32.18 is subject to the following conditions: ( a ) No more than 10 exempt quantities set forth in § 30.71, Schedule B of this chapter shall be sold or transferred in any single transaction. For purposes of this requirement, an individual exempt quantity may be composed of fractional parts of one or more of the exempt quantities in § 30.71, Schedule B of this chapter, provided that the sum of such fractions shall not exceed unity.
( b ) Each quantity of byproduct material set forth in § 30.71, Schedule B of this chapter shall be separately and individually packaged. No more than 10 such packaged exempt quantities shall be contained in any outer package for transfer to persons exempt pursuant to § 30.18 of this chapter. The outer package shall be such that the dose rate at the external surface of the package does not exceed 0.5 millirem per hour.
( c ) The immediate container of each quantity or separately packaged fractional quantity of byproduct material shall bear a durable, legible label which ( 1 ) identifies the radioisotope and the quantity of radioactivity, and
( 2 ) bears the words “Radioactive Material.”
( d ) In addition to the labeling information required by paragraph (c) of this section, the label affixed to the immediate container, or an accompanying brochure, shall also ( 1 ) state that the contents are exempt from NRC or Agreement State licensing requirements;
( 2 ) bear the words “Radioactive Material—Not for Human Use—Introduction Into Foods, Beverages, Cosmetics, Drugs, or Medicinals, or Into Products Manufactured for Commercial Distribution is Prohibited—Exempt Quantities Should Not be Combined”; and
( 3 ) set forth appropriate additional radiation safety precautions and instructions relating to the handling, use, storage, and disposal of the radioactive material.
[35 FR 6428, Apr. 22, 1970]
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 33 (Friday, February 19, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 7541]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-3178]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Area 1 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel (Including the 
States of New York, Connecticut, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, New 
Hampshire, Vermont and Maine)

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Area 1 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be 
conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, 
ideas and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal 
Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Tuesday, March 16, 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Audrey Y. Jenkins at 1-888-912-1227 or 
718-488-2085.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that an open meeting of the Area 1 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be held 
Tuesday, March 16, 2010, at 10 a.m. Eastern Time via telephone 
conference. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit 
written statements for consideration. Due to limited conference lines, 
notification of intent to participate must be made with Audrey Y. 
Jenkins. For more information please contact Ms. Jenkins at 1-888-912-
1227 or 718-488-2085, or write TAP Office, 10 MetroTech Center, 625 
Fulton Street, Brooklyn, NY 11201, or contact us at the Web site: 
http://www.improveirs.org.
    The agenda will include various IRS issues.

    Dated: February 4, 2010.
Shawn F. Collins,
Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. 2010-3178 Filed 2-18-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
§ 981.40 Procedure. ( a ) *Organization and rules.* The members of the Board shall select a chairman from their membership. The Board shall select such other officers and adopt such rules for the conduct of its business as it may deem advisable. The Board shall give to the Secretary or his designated agent and representatives the same notice of meetings of the Board as is given to members of the Board.
( b ) *Quorum.* All decisions of the Board, except where otherwise specifically provided, shall be by a majority vote of the members present. The presence of six members shall be required to constitute a quorum.
( c ) *Voting by mail, telegram, fax or other electronic means.* The Board may vote by mail, telegram, fax or other electronic means upon written notice to all members, or alternates acting in their place, including in the notice a statement of a reasonable time, not to exceed 10 days, in which a vote by mail, telegram, fax or other electronic means must be received by the Board for counting. Voting by mail, telegram, fax or other electronic means shall not be permitted at any assembled meeting of the Board. When a proposition is submitted for vote by mail, telegram, fax or other electronic means, at least eight members of the Board must vote in favor of its passage or the proposition shall be defeated.
( d ) *Right of the Secretary.* The members of the Board (including successors or alternates), and any agent or employee appointed or employed by the Board, shall be subject to removal or suspension by the Secretary at any time. Each and every order, regulation, decision, determination, or other act of the Board shall be subject to the continuing right of the Secretary to disapprove of the same at any time, and, upon such disapproval, shall be deemed null and void except as to acts done in reliance thereon or in compliance therewith.
( e ) *Additional voting requirements.* Adoption of recommendations by the Board with respect to projects pursuant to § 981.41 involving production research, marketing research and development projects, and marketing promotion including paid advertising and crediting the pro rata expense assessment obligation of handlers with such portion of their direct expenditures for marketing promotion including paid advertising, shall require at least seven affirmative votes.
[35 FR 11372, July 16, 1970, as amended at 37 FR 3984, Feb. 15, 1972; 61 FR 32921, June 26, 1996]
#### § 959.13 Container.

*Container* means a box, bag, crate, hamper, basket, package, or any other receptacle used in the packaging, transportation, sale, shipment or other handling of onions.
###### Editorial Note on Part 30

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 30 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

#### § 30.2 Resolution of conflict.

The requirements of this part are in addition to, and not in substitution for, other requirements of this chapter. In any conflict between the requirements in this part and a specific requirement in another part of the regulations in this chapter, the specific requirement governs.

[30 FR 8185, June 26, 1965]
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3540 

To suspend temporarily the duty on unbleached cheesecloth. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 20, 2006 

Mr. GRAHAM introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on unbleached cheesecloth. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. UNBLEACHED CHEESECLOTH. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.52.11 Unbleached cheesecloth; lawns, voiles, or 

batistes, less than 85 percent by weight 

of cotton, mixed with man-made fibers, 

less than or equal to 200 g/m2, of average yarn, number 69 or higher number, 

of width exceeding 225 centimeters (provided for in subheading 5210.11.80) ....... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
2 

•S 3540 IS 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


jcorcoran on PROD1PC62 with BILLS
§ 20.2101 General provisions. ( a ) Each licensee shall use the units: curie, rad, rem, including multiples and subdivisions, and shall clearly indicate the units of all quantities on records required by this part.
( b ) In the records required by this part, the licensee may record quantities in SI units in parentheses following each of the units specified in paragraph (a) of this section. However, all quantities must be recorded as stated in paragraph (a) of this section.
( c ) Not withstanding the requirements of paragraph (a) of this section, when recording information on shipment manifests, as required in § 20.2006(b), information must be recorded in the International System of Units (SI) or in SI and units as specified in paragraph (a) of this section.
( d ) The licensee shall make a clear distinction among the quantities entered on the records required by this part (e.g., total effective dose equivalent, shallow-dose equivalent, lens dose equivalent, deep-dose equivalent, committed effective dose equivalent).
[56 FR 23404, May 21, 1991, as amended at 60 FR 15663, Mar. 27, 1995; 63 FR 39483, July 23, 1998]
Subpart 336.1 - General

Parent topic: PART 336 - CONSTRUCTION AND ARCHITECT-ENGINEER CONTRACTS

336.104 Policy.

Contracting officers shall follow the policies described in Federal Acquisition Regulation 36.104 and

the guidance promulgated by the Department of Health and Human Services Facilities Management.
SUBCHAPTER C - CONTRACTING METHODS

AND CONTRACT TYPES

PART 2813 - SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION PROCEDURES

PART 2814 - SEALED BIDDING

PART 2815 - CONTRACTING BY NEGOTIATION

PART 2816 - TYPES OF CONTRACTS

PART 2817 - SPECIAL CONTRACTING METHODS

PART 2813 - SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION PROCEDURES

Subpart 2813.2 - Actions at or Below the Micro-Purchase Threshold

2813.201 General.

Subpart 2813.3 - Simplified Acquisition Methods

2813.305 Imprest funds and third party drafts.

2813.307 Forms.

Subpart 2813.4 - Fast Payment Procedure

2813.401 General.

Subpart 2813.70 - Certified Invoice Procedure

2813.70-1 Policy.

2813.70-2 Procedures.

PART 2814 - SEALED BIDDING

Subpart 2814.4 - Opening of Bids and Award of Contract

2814.404 Rejection of bids.

2814.404-1 Cancellation of invitations after opening.

2814.407 Mistakes in bids.

2814.407-3 Other mistakes disclosed before award.

2814.407-4 Mistakes after award.

PART 2815 - CONTRACTING BY NEGOTIATION

Subpart 2815.2 - Solicitation and Receipt of Proposals and Information

2815.204 Contract format.

Subpart 2815.3 - Source Selection

2815.303 Responsibilities.

Subpart 2815.4 - Contract Pricing

2815.404 Proposal analysis.

2815.404-2 Data to support proposal analysis.

Subpart 2815.6 - Unsolicited Proposals

2815.604 Agency points of contact.

2815.605 Content of unsolicited proposals.

2815.606 Agency procedures.

PART 2816 - TYPES OF CONTRACTS

Subpart 2816.2 - Fixed-Price Contracts

2816.207 Firm-fixed-price, level-of-effort term contracts.

2816.207-3 Limitations.

Subpart 2816.5 - Indefinite-Delivery Contracts

2816.505 Ordering.

Subpart 2816.6 - Time-and-Materials, Labor-Hour, and Letter Contracts

2816.601 Time-and-materials contracts.

2816.602 Labor-hour contracts.
PART 2817 - SPECIAL CONTRACTING METHODS

Subpart 2817.1 - Multiyear Contracting

2817.104 General.

Subpart 2817.2 - Options

2817.204 Contracts.

Subpart 2817.6 - Management and Operating Contracts

2817.602 Policy.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, EASTERN DIVISION

OWEN J. ROGAL, D.D.S., )

P.C. d/b/a THE PAIN CENTER, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

v. ) 3:06cv728-MHT

) 

SKILSTAF, INC., )

)

Defendant. )

ORDER

Because of a scheduling conflict, it is ORDERED that

the uniform scheduling order is amended to reflect that

the pretrial will be on August 14, 2007, with all

deadlines tied to the pretrial date adjusted accordingly.

DONE, this the 8th day of June, 2007.

 /s/ Myron H. Thompson 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-00728-MHT-WC Document 60 Filed 06/08/2007 Page 1 of 1
#### § 930.72 Verification of reports and records.

For the purpose of assuring compliance and checking and verifying the reports filed by handlers, the Secretary and the Board, through its duly authorized agents, shall have access to any premises where applicable records are maintained, where cherries are received, stored, or handled, and, at any time during reasonable business hours, shall be permitted to inspect such handlers premises and any and all records of such handlers with respect to matters within the purview of this part.
**Exhibit 34.5**

(logo) pwc

** **

**Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

To the Board of Directors and shareholders of CoreLogic, Inc.:

 

We have examined management’s assertion, included in the accompanyingReport on Assessment of Compliance, that CoreLogic Commercial Real Estate Services, Inc. (the “Company”), an indirectsubsidiary of CoreLogic, Inc. complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission’sRegulation AB for all loans for commercial mortgage loan outsourcing customers for which the Company served as the commercial taxservice provider (the “Platform”), as of December 31, 2015 and for the year then ended, only including 1122(d)(1)(iv),1122(d)(2)(ii), 1122(d)(2)(v), 1122(d)(2)(vi), 1122(d)(2)(vii), 1122(d)(4)(xi), 1122(d)(4)(xii) and 1122(d)(4)(xiii), which theCompany has determined are applicable to the servicing activities performed by it with respect to the Platform. Management is responsiblefor the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assertionbased on our examination.

 

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standardsof the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidenceabout the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considerednecessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of selected servicing activities related to the Platform, anddetermining whether the Company performed those selected activities in compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our procedureswere limited to the selected servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedureswere not designed to detect noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurred prior to or subsequent to our tests that mayhave affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report. We believethat our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on theCompany’s compliance with the servicing criteria.

 

In our opinion, management’s assertion that the Company compliedwith the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2015 for all loans for commercialmortgage loan outsourcing customers for which the Company served as the commercial tax service provider is fairly stated, in allmaterial respects.

 

February 4, 2016

 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers

 

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, 2001 Ross Avenue, Suite 1800, Dallas,Texas 75201

T: (214) 999-1400, F: (214) 754-7991, www.pwc.com/us
#### § 205.309 Filing procedures and fees.

Applications shall be addressed to the Office of Utility Systems of the Economic Regulatory Administration. Every application shall be accompanied by a fee of $500.00. Fee payment shall be by check, draft, or money order payable to the Treasurer of the United States. Copies of applications and notifications of rate changes shall be furnished to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission and all affected State public utility regulatory agencies.
#### Srochi *v.*Ventrees.

July 19, 1913.

Beck, J.

1. The first ground of the amendment to the motion for a new trial, complaining of the admission of certain testimony, is not approved by the trial judge, and consequently will not be considered by this court.

2. Considering the scope of the evidence on the trial and the character of the same, the court did not err in overruling the ground of the motion based upon newly discovered evidence. Under the showing made, the court might well have held that due diligence was not used to-procure this evidence on the trial; and besides, the evidence was not of such a character as to show that it would probably produce a different result upon another trial. *Young*v. *State,*56 *Ga.*403; *Berry*v. *State,*10 *Ga.*511.

3. The evidence authorized the verdict.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*

*346Fulton superioiAction for damages. Before Judge Pendleton, court. May 9, 1912.

*Lewis W. Thomas,*for plaintiff in error.

*Hewlett & Dennis,*contra.