alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Solomon Mesholam, Respondent, v Isabelle Helene Mesholam, Appellant.

Submitted October 15, 2007;

decided January 8, 2008

Reported below, 25 AD3d 670.

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that it has been superceded by a subsequent motion for leave to appeal made by this appellant.
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. 

Wniteb ~tate% QCourt of ~eal% 

for tbe jf eheral QCircuit 

ICHL, LLC (DOING BUSINESS AS INTELLECTUAL 

CAPITAL HOLDINGS LIMITED), 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v. 

SONY ELECTRONICS, INC., 

Defendant-Appellee, 

AND 

LENOVO, INC., 

Defendant-Appellee. 

2011-1202 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the 

Eastern District of Texas in case no. 08-CV-0065, Judge 

David J. Folsom. 

ON MOTION 

ORDER 
ICHL v. SONY ELECTRONICS 2 

Sony Electronics Inc. and Lenovo, Inc. move without 

opposition for extensions of time to file their response 

briefs. 

Upon consideration thereof, 

IT Is ORDERED THAT: 

The motion is granted. Sony and Lenovo shall file 

their response briefs no later than June 2, 2011. ICHL, 

LLC's reply brief shall be due no later than June 16, 

2011. 

HAY 1 B 2011 

Date 

cc: Eric T. Stahl, Esq. 

s21 

Luke L. Dauchot, Esq. 

Kevin P.B. Johnson, Esq. 

FOR THE COURT 

lsI Jan Horbaly 

Jan Horbaly 

Clerk 

'~.COURf~~PEALSFOR THE FEOERAl CIRCUIT 

MAY 18 zon 

JAIt IIORMlY 

Cl.EAK
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. William Fagan, Appellant.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated October 11, 1967, dismissed. We construe defendant’s motion as one for resentence. As such, the order denying the motion is not appealable *(People*v. *Machado,*18 A D 2d 1103; *People*v. *Noor,*31 A D 2d 524). We have nevertheless considered the motion on its merits and, were we not dismissing this appeal, we would affirm the order. Beldock, P. J., Christ, Brennan, Rabin and Benjamin, JJ., concur.
§ 1021.343 Variances. ( a ) *Emergency actions.* DOE may take an action without observing all provisions of this part or the CEQ Regulations, in accordance with 40 CFR 1506.11, in emergency situations that demand immediate action. DOE shall consult with CEQ as soon as possible regarding alternative arrangements for emergency actions having significant environmental impacts. DOE shall document, including publishing a notice in the Federal Register, emergency actions covered by this paragraph within 30 days after such action occurs; this documentation shall identify any adverse impacts from the actions taken, further mitigation necessary, and any NEPA documents that may be required.
( b ) *Reduction of time periods.* On a case-by-case basis, DOE may reduce time periods established in this part that are not required by the CEQ Regulations. If DOE determines that such reduction is necessary, DOE shall publish a notice in the Federal Register specifying the revised time periods and the rationale for the reduction.
( c ) *Other.* Any variance from the requirements of this part, other than as provided by paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section, must be soundly based on the interests of national security or the public health, safety, or welfare and must have the advance written approval of the Secretary; however, the Secretary is not authorized to waive or grant a variance from any requirement of the CEQ Regulations (except as provided for in those regulations). If the Secretary determines that a variance from the requirements of this part is within his/her authority to grant and is necessary, DOE shall publish a notice in the Federal Register specifying the variance granted and the reasons.
909.507-2 Contract clause.       (a)          (1)  			The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 952.209-72, Organizational Conflicts of Interest, in each solicitation and contract for advisory and assistance services expected to exceed the simplified acquisition threshold.          (2) Contracting officers may make appropriate modifications where necessary to address the potential for organizational conflicts of interest in individual contracts. Contracting officers shall determine the appropriate term of the bar of paragraph (b)(1)          (i)  			of the clause at 952.209-72 and enter that term in the blank provided. In the usual case of a contract for advisory and assistance services a period of three, four, or five years is appropriate; however, in individual cases the contracting officer may insert a term of greater or lesser duration.          (3) The contracting officer shall include Alternate I with the clause in instances in which a meaningful amount of subcontracting for advisory and assistance services is expected.          (b) Contracts, which are not subject to part 970 but provide for the operation of a DOE site or facility or environmental remediation of a specific DOE site or sites, shall contain the organizational conflict of interest clause at 952.209-72. The organizational conflicts of interest clause in such contracts shall include Alternate I to that clause.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 909.5 - Organizational and Consultant Conflicts of Interest
###### Editorial Note on Part 2

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

#### § 2.1107 Notice of proposed action.

In connection with each application filed after January 7, 1983, for a license or an amendment to a license to expand the spent nuclear fuel storage capacity at the site of a civilian nuclear power plant, for which the Commission has not found that a hearing is required in the public interest, for which an adjudicatory hearing has not yet been convened, and for which a notice of proposed action has not yet been published as of the effective date of this subpart, the Commission will, prior to acting thereon, cause to be published in the Federal Register a notice of proposed action in accordance with § 2.105. The notice of proposed action will identify the availability of the hybrid hearing procedures in this subpart, specify that any party may invoke these procedures by filing a timely request for oral argument under § 2.1109, and provide that if a request for oral argument is granted, any hearing held on the application shall be conducted in accordance with the procedures in this subpart.
SUBCHAPTER G - CONTRACT

MANAGEMENT

PART 2143 - CONTRACT MODIFICATIONS

PART 2144 - SUBCONTRACTING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES

PART 2146 - QUALITY ASSURANCE

PART 2149 - TERMINATION OF CONTRACTS

PART 2143 - CONTRACT MODIFICATIONS

Subpart 2143.1 - General

2143.101 Definitions.

Subpart 2143.2 - Change Orders

2143.205 Contract clause.

PART 2144 - SUBCONTRACTING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES

Subpart 2144.1 - General

2144.102 Policy.

Subpart 2144.2 - Consent to Subcontracts

2144.204 Contract clause.

PART 2146 - QUALITY ASSURANCE

Subpart 2146.2 - Contract Quality Requirements

2146.201 General.

2146.270 FEGLI Program quality assurance requirements.

2146.270-1 Contract clause.

PART 2149 - TERMINATION OF CONTRACTS

2149.002 Applicability.

Subpart 2149.5 - Contract Termination Clauses

2149.505 Other termination clauses.

2149.505-70 FEGLI Program contract termination clause.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 246 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 246

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that there should 
  be established a National Drug Court Month, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 2005

Mr. Kennedy of Rhode Island (for himself and Mr. Ramstad) submitted the 
following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Government 
                                 Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that there should 
  be established a National Drug Court Month, and for other purposes.

Whereas drug courts provide the focus and leadership for community-wide, anti-
        drug systems, bringing together public safety professionals and other 
        community partners in the fight against drug abuse and criminality;
Whereas the results of more than 100 program evaluations and at least 3 
        experimental studies have yielded definitive evidence that drug courts 
        increase treatment retention and reduce substance abuse and crime among 
        drug-involved adult offenders;
Whereas judges, prosecutors, defense attorneys, substance abuse treatment and 
        rehabilitation professionals, law enforcement and community supervision 
        personnel, researchers and educators, national and community leaders, 
        and others dedicated to the drug court movement have had a profound 
        impact within their communities;
Whereas the drug court movement has grown from the 12 original drug courts in 
        1994 to 1,621 operational drug courts as of December 2004; and
Whereas the establishment of a National Drug Court Month would increase 
        awareness about drug courts at the Federal, State, and local levels: 
        Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives 
that--
            (1) there should be established a National Drug Court Month 
        to increase awareness about drug courts at the Federal, State, 
        and local level; and
            (2) the President should issue a proclamation calling upon 
        the people of the United States and interested groups to 
        observe the month with appropriate ceremonies and activities.
                                 <all>
```
Case 2:06-cv-00754-WC Document 3 Filed 09/12/2006 Page 1 of 1
H. Res. 268

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

May 11, 2005.

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule

XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of

the bill (H.R. 1279) to amend title 18, United States Code,

to reduce violent gang crime and protect law-abiding citizens

and communities from violent criminals, and for other purposes. The first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with.

All points of order against consideration of the bill are

waived. General debate shall be confined to the bill and shall

not exceed one hour equally divided and controlled by the

chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on

the Judiciary. After general debate the bill shall be considered for amendment under the five-minute rule. It shall be

in order to consider as an original bill for the purpose of

amendment under the five-minute rule the amendment in the

nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on the

Judiciary now printed in the bill. The committee amendment
2

•HRES 268 EH

in the nature of a substitute shall be considered as read. Notwithstanding clause 11 of rule XVIII, no amendment to the

committee amendment in the nature of a substitute shall be

in order except those printed in the report of the Committee

on Rules accompanying this resolution. Each such amendment may be offered only in the order printed in the report,

may be offered only by a Member designated in the report,

shall be considered as read, shall be debatable for the time

specified in the report equally divided and controlled by the

proponent and an opponent, shall not be subject to amendment, and shall not be subject to a demand for division of

the question in the House or in the Committee of the Whole.

All points of order against such amendments are waived. At

the conclusion of consideration of the bill for amendment the

Committee shall rise and report the bill to the House with

such amendments as may have been adopted. Any Member

may demand a separate vote in the House on any amendment

adopted in the Committee of the Whole to the bill or to the

committee amendment in the nature of a substitute. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and

amendments thereto to final passage without intervening mo-
3

•HRES 268 EH

tion except one motion to recommit with or without instructions.

Attest:

Clerk.
§ 1017.8 Subject areas eligible to be Unclassified Controlled Nuclear Information. To be eligible for identification as UCNI, information must concern at least one of the following categories: ( a ) The design of production or utilization facilities as defined in this part;
( b ) Security measures (including security plans, procedures, and equipment) for the physical protection of production or utilization facilities or nuclear material, regardless of its physical state or form, contained in these facilities or in transit; or
( c ) The design, manufacture, or utilization of nuclear weapons or components that were once classified as Restricted Data, as defined in section 11y. of the Atomic Energy Act.
Exhibit 32.1



Citizens Financial Corp.



Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley

Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350



I,
Robert J. Schoonover, President and Chief Executive Officer of Citizens Financial Corp. (the company) certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 that:



|1. | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the company for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the report)
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |                                      
|--------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: August 10, 2005 |  | /s/ Robert J. Schoonover             
|                      |  | Robert J. Schoonover                 
|                      |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
#### § 1705.10 Fees.

A fee will not be charged for search or review of requested records, or for correction of records. When a request is made for copies of records, a copying fee will be charged at the same rate established for FOIA requests. *See* 10 CFR 1703.107. However, the first 100 pages of copying will be free of charge.
#### § 1048.3 Unauthorized entry.

Unauthorized entry into or upon an SPR facility or real property subject to this part, without authorization, is prohibited.
630.201-5 Waiver.       (a) The Procurement Executive is the head of the agency for the purposes of FAR 30.201–5(a) and (b).    **Parent topic:** Subpart 630.2—CAS Program Requirements
#### § 993.517 Identification.

The size category of the prunes in any lot shall be clearly marked by the handler on each consumer package of such prunes, on the parts or panels of the package or label which are normally presented in retail display, in terms of the applicable numerical or nomenclature designation prescribed in § 993.515, which designation shall not be lacking in prominence and conspicuousness. Any handler may, at his option, clearly mark on such consumer package additional information describing in numerical terms the average size count, or particular range of size counts, of the prunes in such lot so long as such numerical terms fall within the range of the size counts of the applicable numerical or nomenclature designation and do not tend to be deceptive as to the actual average size count, or range of the size counts, of the prunes in such lot. Descriptive terms other than synonyms of the prescribed nomenclature designation or words of like connotation, describing the style of pack, variety of prune, or other item of commercial significance may also be marked on the consumer package. Prunes in any lot of which the maximum size count is less than 25 shall be clearly marked by the handler in terms of the applicable numerical designation prescribed in § 993.515(a); and the handler may use nomenclature terms descriptive of size other than the nomenclature designations prescribed in § 993.515(b).

[26 FR 8281, Sept. 2, 1961, as amended at 46 FR 38070, July 24, 1981]
§ 21.8 Information collection requirements: OMB approval. ( a ) The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has submitted the information collection requirements contained in this part to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for approval as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 *et seq.*). The NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. OMB has approved the information collection requirements contained in this part under control number 3150-0035.
( b ) The approved information collection requirements contained in this part appear in §§ 21.7, 21.21 and 21.51.
[62 FR 52185, Oct. 6, 1997]
Case 3:06-cr-00208-MEF-CSC Document 44 Filed 03/05/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 3:06-cr-00208-MEF-CSC Document 44 Filed 03/05/2007 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 32.2CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

       In connection with the quarterly reportof CNB Corporation on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2006 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, L. FordSanders, II, Interim Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer ofCNB Corporation, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002 that:

 
| 1. | The  above-listed Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)  or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                 |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|    |                                                                                                                                                                    |
| 2. | The  information contained in the above-listed Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all  material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the  Company. |
| Date:  November  6, 2006 | /s/L. Ford  Sanders, II                   L. Ford Sanders, II  Interim Executive Vice President  and Chief Financial  Officer |
|------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                              |
Case 2:06-cv-00653-WHA-CSC Document 20 Filed 08/24/2006 Page 1 of 13
Case 2:06-cv-00653-WHA-CSC Document 20 Filed 08/24/2006 Page 2 of 13
Case 2:06-cv-00653-WHA-CSC Document 20 Filed 08/24/2006 Page 3 of 13
Case 2:06-cv-00653-WHA-CSC Document 20 Filed 08/24/2006 Page 4 of 13
Case 2:06-cv-00653-WHA-CSC Document 20 Filed 08/24/2006 Page 5 of 13
Case 2:06-cv-00653-WHA-CSC Document 20 Filed 08/24/2006 Page 6 of 13
Case 2:06-cv-00653-WHA-CSC Document 20 Filed 08/24/2006 Page 7 of 13
Case 2:06-cv-00653-WHA-CSC Document 20 Filed 08/24/2006 Page 8 of 13
Case 2:06-cv-00653-WHA-CSC Document 20 Filed 08/24/2006 Page 9 of 13
Case 2:06-cv-00653-WHA-CSC Document 20 Filed 08/24/2006 Page 10 of 13
Case 2:06-cv-00653-WHA-CSC Document 20 Filed 08/24/2006 Page 11 of 13
Case 2:06-cv-00653-WHA-CSC Document 20 Filed 08/24/2006 Page 12 of 13
Case 2:06-cv-00653-WHA-CSC Document 20 Filed 08/24/2006 Page 13 of 13
HAG

ONIAAVEG

IN

Ai

38 30 _

77°00

SYMBOLOGY

DEPTH
GRADIENTS ++
Meters Feet Hear
°

; = BATHYMETRIC CONTOUR INTERVAL 2 METERS

ms WITH SUPPLEMENTARY 1 METER CONTOURS
re DATUM IS MEAN LOW WATER

* ROCK
=> LOW WATER |

HABIAINN SNIMVEG

( WASHINGTON NE, MD-D.C.)

£5 I=

PRED NARY PYDL NCMINE TON LAST oo

SUBSEDT TE REP PS REVISION
F I LED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

July 10, 2006

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

Clerk of Court

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

GARRY ENSEY, also known as

Garry Dean Ensey,

Petitioner-Appellant,

v.

MIKE MULLINS, Warden,

Respondent-Appellee.

No. 05-7104

(D.C. No. 02-CV-501-P)

(E.D. Okla.)

ORDER

DENYING A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY

Before TACHA, Chief Judge, O’BRIEN, and McCONNELL, Circuit Judges.

Garry Ensey, an Oklahoma state prisoner proceeding pro se, seeks a

certificate of appealability (“COA”) to challenge the district court’s denial and

dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for a writ of habeas corpus, in which he

asserted that his Sixth Amendment right to a speedy trial and his rights under the

Interstate Agreement on Detainers, Okla. Stat. tit. 22, § 1347, were violated.

To obtain a COA under [28 U.S.C.] § 2253(c), a habeas prisoner

must make a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional

right, a demonstration that . . . includes showing that reasonable

jurists could debate whether (or, for that matter, agree that) the

petition should have been resolved in a different manner or that the

issues presented were adequate to deserve encouragement to proceed

further. 
We do not consider Mr. Ensey’s assertion that his right to a speedy trial 1

was violated under the Oklahoma Constitution and Oklahoma’s statutory

provision concerning speedy trials, Okla. Stat. tit. 22, § 812.1. See Estelle v.

McGuire, 502 U.S. 62, 67-68 (1991) (“[I]t is not the province of a federal habeas

court to reexamine state-court determinations on state-law questions.”).

Mr. Ensey filed with this court a request to proceed in forma pauperis (ifp). 2

He was granted permission to proceed ifp in the district court. R., Doc. 18. Since

the district court did not certify in writing that his appeal was not taken in good

faith, 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), his ifp status continues in this court without further

order. See Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(3). His ifp request is therefore denied as moot.

-2-

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 483-84 (2000) (citation and quotation omitted).1

Having carefully considered Mr. Ensey’s application for a COA and his

opening brief, the record, and the applicable law, we determine that he has not

made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. Accordingly,

we DENY his request for a COA and DISMISS the appeal.2

Entered for the Court

Deanell Reece Tacha

Chief Circuit Judge
416.702 Basic agreements.       Promptly after execution by the Government, the HCA shall furnish to the Senior Procurement Executive a copy of each basic agreement negotiated with contractors in accordance with FAR 16.702.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 416.7 - Agreements