alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3434 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3434

To suspend temporarily the duty on certain synthetic staple fibers that 
        are carded, combed, or otherwise processed for spinning.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 6, 2006

   Mr. Burr introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To suspend temporarily the duty on certain synthetic staple fibers that 
        are carded, combed, or otherwise processed for spinning.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ACRYLIC OR MODACRYLIC SYNTHETIC STAPLE FIBERS, CARDED, 
              COMBED, OR OTHERWISE PROCESSED FOR SPINNING.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

``      9902.06.43       Synthetic staple   Free         No change        No change        On or before 12/  ''.
                         fibers, carded,                                                    31/2009
                         combed, or
                         otherwise
                         processed for
                         spinning: acrylic
                         or modacrylic
                         (provided for in
                         subheading
                         5506.30.00)......

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to articles entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 981.75 Confidential nature of records and reports.

All information contained in handler records made available to the Board or the Secretary, or in reports to the Board, constituting a trade secret or disclosing the trade position, financial condition, or business operations of any handler shall be considered as confidential information. Such information received by the Board, shall be kept in the custody and under the control of one or more employees of the Board, who shall disclose such information to no person except the Secretary.
Exhibit 32.2



Citizens Financial Corp.



Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley

Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350



I,
Thomas K. Derbyshire, Vice President, Treasurer and Principal Financial Officer of Citizens Financial Corp. (the company) certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 that:



|1. |  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the company for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. |  | the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the company.
|-- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |  | 
|--------------------- |  |  | 
|Date: August 13, 2003 |  |  | 
|                      |  |  | 



27
* Pursuant to 5 TH CIR
. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5.4. 

### REVISED JUNE 27, 2008 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-51281 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee

v. DANA YOUNG, also known as Dana Dee Young Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 6:07-CR-111-ALL
Before KING, DeMOSS, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Dana Dee Young was convicted by a jury of being a felon in possession of a firearm. Young was sentenced to a 36-month term of imprisonment and to a three-year period of supervised release and was ordered to pay a $2,0 0 0 fine. Young gave timely notice of his appeal. Young contends that the district court erred in denying his motion to suppress the fi rearm found during a traffic stop. Young contends that the United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D June 26, 2008 Charles R. Fulbruge III ClerkNo. 07-51281

2 weapon was discovered after the traffic stop should have ended. The police officer who detained Young developed, during the c ourse of the traffic stop, a reasonable and articulable suspicion that a crime had been or was being committed by Young. Before the final records check was completed, the officer knewthat Young had been behaving suspiciously in the early morning hours in an area known for narcotics trafficking and prostitution, that Young appeared to be nervous, that Young had voluntarily produced twocrack pipes, that Young
was known for carrying a knife, and thatYoung had repeatedly moved his hands to hiswaistband despite repeated instructions by the officer not todoso. Under these circumstances, it was reasonable for the officer tocontinue todetain after the final records check had been completed and to frisk Young to determine whether he was carrying narcotics or a weapon in his waistband. The district court did not clearly err in denying the motion to suppress. See United States v. Brigham, 382 F.3d 500, 506-09 (5th Cir. 2004) (en banc). Young contends that the district court erred in refusing to adjust his offense level for acceptanceofresponsibility. Young argues that he never denied that he possessed the weapon and that he went to trial only so that he would have an opportunity to tell his story. Young has not shown that this case presents a rare situation in which a defendant that has exercised his constitutional right to a jury trial has also clearly demonstrated acceptance of responsibility for the offense. SeeU.S.S.G. § 3E1.1, comment. (n.2). The district court did not clearly err in refusing to award an adjustment for acceptance of responsibility. See United States v. Cordero, 465 F.3d 626, 630-32 (5th Cir. 2006). AFFIRMED.
(November 18, 1980)

#### In the Matter of Rivka Karp et al., Petitioners, v Jay L. Turoff, as Chairman of the New York City Taxi & Limousine Commission, Respondent.

Determination of respondent dated August 15,1979, unanimously annulled, on consent, without costs and without disbursements, and the petition granted to the extent of remanding the matter to respondent for the prompt processing of refunds of the fines' paid. No opinion. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Sullivan, Lupiano, Silverman and Yesawich, JJ.
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

James Craig Cooper, * From the 70th District Court

of Ector County,

Trial Court No. D-18-2074-CR.

Vs. No. 11-19-00225-CR * July 22, 2021

The State of Texas, * Memorandum Opinion by Williams, J.

(Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,

Williams, J., and Wright, S.C.J., 

sitting by assignment)

(Trotter, J., not participating)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is no 

error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, 

the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
October 25, 2011

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

ORION HAROLD, Appellant

NO. 14-11-00650-CV V.

HONG GAO, Appellee

____________________

Today the Court heard its own motion to dismiss the appeal from the judgment 

signed by the court below on July 18, 2011. Having considered the motion and found it 

meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED.

We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by ORION 

HAROLD.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
225 So.2d 476

#### Billy HEYSE, for and on behalf of Rufus Wayne Heyse v. The FIDELITY & CASUALTY COMPANY OF NEW YORK et al.

No. 50018.

Aug. 22, 1969.

In re: Billy Heyse, for and on behalf of Rufus Wayne Heyse applying for writs of review and certiorari.

The petition of the relator in the above entitled and numbered case having been duly considered,

It is ordered that a writ of certiorari issue herein, directing the Honorable Lewis S. Doherty, III, Judge of the Nineteenth Judicial District, Court for the Parish of East Baton Rouge, to transmit to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, on or before the 10th day of November, 1969, the record in duplicate, or a certified copy of the record in duplicate, of the proceedings complained of by the relator herein, to the end that the validity of said proceedings may be ascertained.

It is further ordered that the aforesaid Judge of said Court and the respondent through its attorney shall show cause, in this court, on the date aforesaid, at 11 o’clock A.M., why the relief prayed for in the petition of the relator should not be granted.
### Muta studies for CAS #98-09-9 submitted by Lanxess Corp David Brooks to: John Schaeffer 02/11/2013 01:34 PM Cc: Mark Townsend Hi John, 

### Data supplied on December 3, 2012 and December 17, 2012 by Lanxess Corporation are considered adequate to satisfy the gene mutation (E1) and chromosomal aberrations (E2) test requirements promulgated in the final HPV3 test rule. Please see attached file for our complete assessment of these studies.

98-09-9_HPV3_DA_FINAL Gene_Mut_Chrom_Ab_02-07-2013.docx If you need any further clarification, please do not hesitate to contact us. Dave David Brooks Risk Assessment Division (7403M) High Production Volume Chemical Branch EPA East Room 6308N (202) 564-8603
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

RAMON ALBERTO ARANAESQUIVEL,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 07-50130

D.C. No. CR-06-01359-BTM

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of California

Barry T. Moskowitz, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 29, 2010** 

Before: ALARCÓN, LEAVY, and GRABER, Circuit Judges. 

Ramon Alberto Arana-Esquivel appeals from the 57-month sentence

imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for being a deported alien found in

the United States, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction under 28

FILED

AUG 02 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 07-50130

U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm, but remand to correct the judgment.

Arana-Esquivel contends that the district court erred by determining that his

prior conviction for assault with a semiautomatic firearm, in violation of California

Penal Code § 245(b), constituted a crime of violence under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2,

because section 245(b) prohibits merely negligent or reckless conduct and does not

require specific intent. This contention is foreclosed. See United States v.

Grajeda, 581 F.3d 1186, 1192-97 (9th Cir. 2009). 

Arana-Esquivel also contends that a conviction under section 245(b) is not a

categorical crime of violence because it can be based on California’s theory of

aiding and abetting, which is broader than the federal generic definition. This

contention is unpersuasive. See Gonzales v. Duenas-Alvarez, 549 U.S. 183, 190-

94 (2007).

Finally, Arana-Esquivel contends that the district court erred by imposing a

sentence in excess of the two-year statutory maximum under 8 U.S.C. § 1326. He

contends that the avoidance of constitutional doubt doctrine limits the holding of

Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224 (1998), that Almendarez-Torres

has been overruled, and that section 1326(b) is unconstitutional. These contentions

are foreclosed. See United States v. Grisel, 488 F.3d 844, 846-47 (9th Cir. 2007)

(en banc). Arana-Esquivel further contends that the district court improperly
3 07-50130

determined the date of his prior conviction, the date of his prior deportation, and

the temporal relationship between the two. These contentions are unpersuasive. 

See id. at 847.

In accordance with United States v. Rivera-Sanchez, 222 F.3d 1057, 1062

(9th Cir. 2000), we remand the case to the district court with instructions that it

delete from the judgment the incorrect reference to section 1326(b). See United

States v. Herrera-Blanco, 232 F.3d 715, 719 (9th Cir. 2000) (remanding sua sponte

to delete the reference to section 1326(b)). 

AFFIRMED; REMANDED to correct judgment.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of US Foods, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended December 27, 2014, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John A. Lederer, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: March 24, 2015



/s/ JOHN A. LEDERERJohn A. LedererPresident and Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
The following schedule contains summarized financial information extracted
from the Questar Pipeline Co. Statements of Income and Balance Sheet for the
period ended June 30, 1997, and is qualified in its entirety to such
unaudited financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                           5,411
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,229
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      2,363
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                19,757
<PP&E>                                         566,777
<DEPRECIATION>                                 201,269
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 410,377
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           27,469
<BONDS>                                        134,554
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         6,551
<OTHER-SE>                                     178,974
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   410,377
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                52,628
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   18,545
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,626
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,665
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 18,814
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,032
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             11,782
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    11,782
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
# Subpart 2405.2 - Synopses of Proposed Contract Actions

**Parent topic:**PART 2405 - PUBLICIZING CONTRACT ACTIONS

## 2405.202 Exceptions.

(b) The Senior Procurement Executive shall make the written determination in accordance with FAR 5.202(b) that advance notice of proposed contract actions is not appropriate or reasonable.
<PAGE>


                                                                   EXHIBIT 32.1


   CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of SEDONA Corporation on Form
10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Quarterly Report"), I, Marco A.
Emrich, Chief Executive Officer of SEDONA Corporation certify, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
         (1) The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
         (2) The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
SEDONA Corporation.


Dated: November 15, 2004                  /s/ MARCO A. EMRICH
                                          -------------------------------------
                                          Marco A. Emrich
                                          President and Chief Executive Officer
                                          (Principal Executive Officer)




                                       20
#### Margarita Santiago, Individually and on Behalf of Her Two Minor Children, et al., Appellants, v Barbara Blum, Individually and as Commissioner of the New York State Department of Social Services, et al., Respondent.

In an action for declaratory and injunctive relief involving plaintiffs’ attempt to require defendants to provide public assistance recipients with transcripts of fair hearings prior to the commencement of CPLR article 78 proceedings and to prohibit defendants from rendering fair hearing decisions in public assistance cases prior to hearing a tape of or reading verbatim transcripts of the hearings, plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered September 7, 1979, which (1) denied plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction and for court-ordered disclosure, (2) converted the action for declaratory and injunctive relief into a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review the fair hearing decisions with respect to the two named plaintiffs, (3) directed defendants-respondents to furnish plaintiffs with transcripts of their respective fair hearings, and (4) permitted plaintiffs to file amended petitions in the CPLR article 78 proceedings. Order modified by (1) deleting therefrom the fifth decretal paragraph thereof and (2) adding a provision thereto annulling the determinations of the respondent State commissioner rendered adversely to plaintiffs, Santiago and Osburn, on December 13, 1978 and October 3, 1978, respectively. As so modified, order affirmed, without costs or disbursements, and the matter is remanded to the respondent State commissioner for further proceedings consistent herewith. Since we deem the order of Special Term to be one made in a declaratory judgment action, plaintiffs could appeal therefrom as of right (see CPLR 5701, subd [a]). However, it should be noted that even if we had considered the decision as one made in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, we would have granted the plaintiffs leave to appeal. Special Term properly converted the action for injunc*597tive and declaratory relief into a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78. However, since all the necessary parties were before the court, Special Term erred in failing to address itself to the question of whether the State commissioner acted properly in rendering her determinations (CPLR 103, subd [c]). We have concluded from the record that full transcripts of the fair hearings were not made and that the State commissioner based her determinations, after the fair hearings, upon the hearing officers’ findings of fact in their official reports. The determinations were therefore improperly based on incomplete records (see *Matter of Gutierrez v Blum,*73 AD2d 690; *Ostrowski v City of New York,*601 F2d 629). Hopkins, J. P., Damiani, Titone and Mangano, JJ., concur.
1314.409-1 Award of unclassified contracts.       Requests for records shall be governed by the procedures outlined in DAO 205-14 and 15 CFR part 4.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 1314.4 - Opening of Bids and Awards of Contracts
# SUBPART 28.1 — BONDS

**Parent topic:**PART 28 –– BONDS AND INSURANCE

## 28.106 Administration.

## 28.106-6 Furnishing information.

(c) The CoCO is delegated the authority to provide a certified copy of the performance bond to an interested party and determine the costs for preparing the certified copy of the bond.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

)

v. ) CASE NO. 2:06-CR-00202-WKW

)

EUGENE CLECKLER )

ORDER

It is ORDERED that the date of the sentencing hearing in this matter is CONTINUED from

May 8, 2007, to 2:30 p.m. on May 10, 2007.

DONE this 10th day of April, 2007.

 /s/ W. Keith Watkins 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cr-00202-WKW-CSC Document 98 Filed 04/10/2007 Page 1 of 1