alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 20.1201 Occupational dose limits for adults. ( a ) The licensee shall control the occupational dose to individual adults, except for planned special exposures under § 20.1206, to the following dose limits. ( 1 ) An annual limit, which is the more limiting of— ( i ) The total effective dose equivalent being equal to 5 rems (0.05 Sv); or
( ii ) The sum of the deep-dose equivalent and the committed dose equivalent to any individual organ or tissue other than the lens of the eye being equal to 50 rems (0.5 Sv).
( 2 ) The annual limits to the lens of the eye, to the skin of the whole body, and to the skin of the extremities, which are: ( i ) A lens dose equivalent of 15 rems (0.15 Sv), and
( ii ) A shallow-dose equivalent of 50 rem (0.5 Sv) to the skin of the whole body or to the skin of any extremity.
( b ) Doses received in excess of the annual limits, including doses received during accidents, emergencies, and planned special exposures, must be subtracted from the limits for planned special exposures that the individual may receive during the current year (see § 20.1206(e)(1)) and during the individual's lifetime (see § 20.1206(e)(2)).
( c ) When the external exposure is determined by measurement with an external personal monitoring device, the deep-dose equivalent must be used in place of the effective dose equivalent, unless the effective dose equivalent is determined by a dosimetry method approved by the NRC. The assigned deep-dose equivalent must be for the part of the body receiving the highest exposure. The assigned shallow-dose equivalent must be the dose averaged over the contiguous 10 square centimeters of skin receiving the highest exposure. The deep-dose equivalent, lens-dose equivalent, and shallow-dose equivalent may be assessed from surveys or other radiation measurements for the purpose of demonstrating compliance with the occupational dose limits, if the individual monitoring device was not in the region of highest potential exposure, or the results of individual monitoring are unavailable.
( d ) Derived air concentration (DAC) and annual limit on intake (ALI) values are presented in table 1 of appendix B to part 20 and may be used to determine the individual's dose (see § 20.2106) and to demonstrate compliance with the occupational dose limits.
( e ) In addition to the annual dose limits, the licensee shall limit the soluble uranium intake by an individual to 10 milligrams in a week in consideration of chemical toxicity (see footnote 3 of appendix B to part 20).
( f ) The licensee shall reduce the dose that an individual may be allowed to receive in the current year by the amount of occupational dose received while employed by any other person (see § 20.2104(e)).
[56 FR 23396, May 21, 1991, as amended at 60 FR 20185, Apr. 25, 1995; 63 FR 39482, July 23, 1998; 67 FR 16304, Apr. 5, 2002; 72 FR 68059, Dec. 4, 2007]
PGI Part 210 - MARKET RESEARCH       PGI 210.002 Procedures.                                          PGI 210.070 Market research report guide for improving the tradecraft in services acquisition.    **Parent topic:** PGI Defense Federal Acquisition RegulationPGI 210.002 Procedures.       (e)(ii) Contracting officers are encouraged to retain information on potential offerors that express an interest in an acquisition, in order to solicit feedback in instances when only one offer is received on a competitive solicitation (see PGI                 215.371-2             ).          (iii) Contracting officers should ensure that the contract file includes—          (A) The methods used to conduct market research;          (B) The timeframe in which market research was conducted;          (C) The analysis of the capabilities of the potential sources that were identified during market research; and          (D) Any conclusion(s) reached as a result of market research analysis.PGI 210.070 Market research report guide for improving the tradecraft in services acquisition.       The “Market Research Report Guide for Improving the Tradecraft in Services Acquisition” is designed to effect the collection and sharing of standardized market research information across the Department. The guide is available for download at https://www.acq.osd.mil/asda/dpc/cp/policy/docs/sa/2017_Market_Research_Guide_(Final).pdf.
§ 39.55 Tritium neutron generator target sources. ( a ) Use of a tritium neutron generator target source, containing quantities not exceeding 1,110 GBg [30 curies] and in a well with a surface casing to protect fresh water aquifers, is subject to the requirements of this part except §§ 39.15, 39.41, and 39.77.
( b ) Use of a tritium neutron generator target source, containing quantities exceeding 1,110 GBg [30 curies] or in a well without a surface casing to protect fresh water aquifers, is subject to the requirements of this part except § 39.41.
[68 FR 75390, Dec. 31, 2003]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    3-MOS                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                    SEP-30-1999             DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                               808807                 0
<SECURITIES>                              0                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                             0                 0
<ALLOWANCES>                              0                 0
<INVENTORY>                               0                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                          0                 0
<PP&E>                             13705691                 0
<DEPRECIATION>                      7901341                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                      6671771                 0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     0                 0
<BONDS>                                   0                 0
<COMMON>                                  0                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                     0                 0
<PREFERRED>                               0                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                0                 0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>        6671771                 0
<SALES>                             2163941                 0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                    2171466                 0
<CGS>                                     0                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             0                 0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                          0                 0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                          0                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        0                 0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                      708594                 0
<INCOME-TAX>                              0                 0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                  708594                 0
<DISCONTINUED>                            0                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                           0                 0
<CHANGES>                                 0                 0
<NET-INCOME>                         708594                 0
<EPS-BASIC>                             0                 0
<EPS-DILUTED>                             0                 0


</TABLE>
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

WILLIE FORD )

Plaintiff, )

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO.

)

GUIDANT CORPORATION, a corporation,)

and GUIDANT SALES CORPORATION, )

a corporation, )

Defendants. )

NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL

COMES NOW the Plaintiff in the above styled action and hereby voluntarily

dismisses his case pursuant to 41(a)(1) Federal Rules of Civil Procedure without

prejudice.

Respectfully submitted,

s/Kathryn Harrington

KATHRYN HARRINGTON

OF COUNSEL:

KATHRYN HARRINGTON

HOLLIS & WRIGHT, P.C.

505 North 20th Street, Suite 1500

Birmingham, AL 35203

Telephone: (205) 324-3600

Facsimile: (205) 324-3636

kathrynh@hollis-wright.com

www.hollis-wright.com

Case 2:06-cv-00763-WKW-DRB Document 8 Filed 09/20/2006 Page 1 of 1
§ 215.2 Definitions. As used in this subpart: *Administrator* means the Federal Energy Administrator or his delegate.
*DOE* means the Department of Energy.
*Host government* means the government of the country in which crude oil is produced and includes any entity which it controls, directly or indirectly.
*Person* means any natural person, corporation, partnership, association, consortium, or any other entity doing business or domiciled in the U.S. and includes ( a ) any entity controlled directly or indirectly by such a person and
( b ) the interest of such a person in any joint venture, consortium or other entity to the extent of entitlement to crude oil by reason of such interest.
Editorial Note on Part 2
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

§ 2.1 Scope. This part governs the conduct of all proceedings, other than export and import licensing proceedings described in part 110, under the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, and the Energy Reorganization Act of 1974, for— ( a ) Granting, suspending, revoking, amending, or taking other action with respect to any license, construction permit, or application to transfer a license;
( b ) Issuing orders and demands for information to persons subject to the Commission's jurisdiction, including licensees and persons not licensed by the Commission;
( c ) Imposing civil penalties under Section 234 of the Act;
( d ) Rulemaking under the Act and the Administrative Procedure Act; and
( e ) Standard design approvals under part 52 of this chapter.
[56 FR 40684, Aug. 15, 1991, as amended at 72 FR 49470, Aug. 28, 2007]
Editorial Note on Subpart A of Part 989
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 989 appear at 83 FR 53973, Oct. 26, 2018.

§ 989.62 Authorization for prohibition of trade practices. Whenever the Secretary finds, upon recommendation of the Committee or other information, that continuance of certain practices in trade channels would tend to interfere with the achieving of the objectives of this part, he may prohibit handlers from using such practices, for any crop year or portion thereof, in selling raisins in containers exceeding four pounds net weight. The prohibited practices may include: ( a ) Any provision within or added to a sales contract, or action or agreement outside such contract, whereby the handler is obligated to reflect declines in market prices of raisins by charging the buyer a subsequent market price in lieu of the sales price specified in the contract.
( b ) ( 1 ) Any agreement in an undertaking to hold raisins in reserve for possible future delivery to a buyer, or action or agreement outside such undertaking, whereby the handler is obligated to not reflect increases in market prices by charging the buyer a price specified in the agreement.
( 2 ) Prior to any such practices being prohibited in any crop year, the Committee shall recommend, for the approval of the Secretary, such rules and procedures and such record keeping requirements as are necessary to administer these prohibitions and obtain compliance therewith.
25 FR 12813, Dec. 14, 1960; 27 FR 2506, Mar. 16, 1962, as amended at 84 FR 30863, June 28, 2019]
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

vs. ) Case No. 2:06CR200-WHA

)

HECTOR R. SILVER )

PRETRIAL CONFERENCE ORDER

A pretrial conference was held on September 25, 2006 before the undersigned

Magistrate Judge. Present at this conference was the Honorable Donnie Bethel, counsel

for the defendant, and Assistant United States Attorney Terry Moorer, counsel for the

government. As a result of the conference, it is

ORDERED as follows:

1. Jury selection is set for October 24, 2006. The trial of this case is set for the

trial term commencing on October 24, 2006 before Senior United States District Judge

W. Harold Albritton and is expected to last two (2) trial days.

2. There are no motions currently pending.

3. Proposed voir dire questions shall be filed on or before October 17, 2006.

Counsel should not include questions seeking information which is provided in the jury

questionnaire.

4. All Motions in Limine shall be filed on or before October 17, 2006. Motions in

Limine must be accompanied by a brief. Failure to file a brief will result in denial of the

motion.

Case 2:06-cr-00200-WHA-CSC Document 54-2 Filed 09/26/2006 Page 1 of 2
5. Proposed jury instructions shall be filed on or before October 17, 2006.

6. The court will not consider a plea pursuant to Rule 11(c) (1)(A) or (C) unless

notice is filed on or before noon on October 12, 2006. The government and defendant

are informed that if a defendant waits until the last minute to enter a plea, and if that plea,

for whatever reason, is not accepted by the court, the defendant and the government will

be expected to be prepared to go to trial on October 24, 2006. The court will not

continue the trial of this case as to any defendant because a defendant’s plea was not

accepted. In other words, the defendant and the government should not wait until the last

minute for a defendant to enter a guilty plea, and both the defendant and the government

should all be ready to go to trial on October 24, 2006, as to all defendants, even though a

particular guilty plea was not accepted by the court.

Done this 26 day of September, 2006. th

 /s/Charles S. Coody 

CHARLES S. COODY

CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:06-cr-00200-WHA-CSC Document 54-2 Filed 09/26/2006 Page 2 of 2
Case 3:06-cv-00773-WKW-CSC Document 1 Filed 08/28/06 Page 1 of 5
Case 3:06-cv-00773-WKW-CSC Document 1 Filed 08/28/06 Page 2 of 5
Case 3:06-cv-00773-WKW-CSC Document 1 Filed 08/28/06 Page 3 of 5
Case 3:06-cv-00773-WKW-CSC Document 1 Filed 08/28/06 Page 4 of 5
Case 3:06-cv-00773-WKW-CSC Document 1 Filed 08/28/06 Page 5 of 5
Case 2:06-cv-00767-MEF-SRW Document 23 Filed 11/16/2006 Page 1 of 1
Subpart 3053.1—General

Parent topic: PART 3053—FORMS

3053.101 Requirements for use of forms.

Unless excepted, forms prescribed in (FAR) 48 CFR part 53 and (HSAR) 48 CFR part 3053 are

required for use by all Components.

3053.103 Exceptions.

Requests for exceptions to forms contained in (FAR) 48 CFR part 53 and to DHS forms in (HSAR) 48

CFR part 3053 shall be submitted, as prescribed in (FAR) 48 CFR 53.103, to the CPO.
H. Res. 266

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

May 16, 2005.

Whereas the well-being of all people of the United States is

preserved and enhanced as a direct result of the vigilance

and dedication of law enforcement personnel;

Whereas more than 870,000 law enforcement personnel, the

highest amount ever in the United States, serve their fellow citizens as guardians of peace;

Whereas peace officers are on the front line in preserving the

right of the children of the United States to receive an

education in a crime-free environment, a right that is all

too often threatened by the insidious fear caused by violence in schools;

Whereas 153 peace officers across the Nation were killed in

the line of duty during 2004, well below the decade-long

average of 165 deaths annually, and a major drop from

2001 when 230 officers were killed, including 72 officers

in the September 11th terrorist attacks;

Whereas every year, a law enforcement officer is killed somewhere in the United States every 53 hours, and there are

also 56,000 assaults against our law officers each year,

resulting in 17,000 injuries;

Whereas section 136 of title 36, United States Code, requests

that the President issue each year a proclamation desig-
2

•HRES 266 EH

nating May 15 as Peace Officers Memorial Day in honor

of Federal, State, and local officers killed or disabled in

the line of duty; and

Whereas on May 13, 2005, more than 20,000 peace officers

are expected to gather in Washington, D.C. to join with

the families of their recently fallen comrades to honor

those comrades and all others who went before them:

Now, therefore, be it

Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

(1) supports the goals and ideals of Peace Officers

Memorial Day to honor Federal, State, and local peace

officers killed or disabled in the line of duty; and

(2) calls upon the people of the United States to observe such a day with appropriate ceremonies and respect.

Attest:

Clerk.
\
2 | United States
Who should order the Financing Guide? | Environmental Protection Agchoy
| Solid Waste and Emergency Response (5306W)

© Recycling market development officials

accessed on
the Internet?

The Guide is
available from
the EPA World Wide
Web site at the URL
address
http://www.epa.gov.
Locate the search function
and type “Financing Recycling.”

and Networks

EPA530-F-96-039 September 1996

Economic developers
© Recycling entrepreneurs ; SEPA A Financing
How can a hard copy of the Guide be | Guide for
ner? ute fee u , | | Recycling

e Guide is available free of charge compliments | : | . .
of the U.S. EPA through the RCRA Hotline at | | Businesses:
(800)424-9346.
How can the Investment _
Guide be | Forums, Meetings

4%.

i | | Bas ssPlaty 46
BEB ea )
Peta ae R L

geese 82, €cyclin

2288 258 8 Investme
Pie ons ‘Ot Forums



_ A Financing Guide
for Recycling
Businesses:

Investment Forums,
Meetings and Networks

Recycling is a growth industry which provides
investment opportunities while serving our envi-
ronment. New and expanding recycling ventures
require access to capital, yet the financing com-
munity —
often is
unaware of
the oppor-
tunities these ventures
represent, The U.S. EPA devel-
oped this Financing Guide to help recycling ven-
tures identify sources of needed capital and to
foster awareness of these opportunities among
financiers. The Guide provides information on:

Recycling Business Planning: documenting the
business strengths necessary for recycling enter-
prises to attract significant investment, Areas
addressed include the company’s mission and his-
tory, the management team, marketing, operations,
and financing.

Ve)

Business Financing Strategies: ways for entre-
preneurs and economic developers to identify a
wide range of potential financial pariners, includ-
ing individual “angel” investors. Cost-effective
methods for structuring equity capitalization are
also reviewed, including Small Corporate Offering
Registrations (SCOR offerings).

Recycling Investment Forums: recommenda-
tions for economic developers and prospective
forum organizers on the design of forums for
investors to meet recycling businesses.

Investment Forum, Meeting, Network and

Association Directory: a listing of over 100

investment forums, meetings, and networks that
have developed across

the
country to
help entre-
preneurs,
Ri, investors and
service providers find com-
patible partners. ‘The directory documents many
strategies that have evolved across the country for
fostering small business capital formation and
entrepreneurship.

(©)

video locuments how recycling investment
can help foster access to capital anc
~ entrepreneutial training for the recycling
industry. ‘The video was produced by South
Carolina Educational Television using
footage of interviews and presentations con-
ducted at the Southeastern Recycling
Investment Forum conducted on November
15-16, 1996 in Charleston, South Carolina.

The video is most appropriate for recycling
market development and economic devel-
opment officials and can be ordered from
the National Recycling Coalition (NRC) at
(703) 683-9025.

A)
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
You havereached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC)Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC.Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of catalogingand locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications.  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the eventthat publications are no longer available from the original publishing agencysite. (Historical purposes)
**Title:****Fieldoperations guide for disaster assessment and response**** 
SuDocNumber:ID1.8:F 45
ItemNumber:0900-I-01(online)
CGPSystem Number:000597501
 
Mobi
PDF
ePub
 
 **
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

 NORTHERN DIVISION

_________________________________

FREDERICK ROSS, #85881 *

JOHN GREER, #87837

*

Plaintiffs,

*

 v. 2:06-CV-771-ID

*

SHERIFF D.T. MARSHALL, et al.,

*

Defendants. 

 __________________________________

O R D E R

Plaintiffs filed this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action challenging the conditions of confinement

at the Montgomery County Detention Center. Plaintiffs filed a single motion for leave to

proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d). The Prison

Litigation Reform Act of 1996 requires “each individual prisoner to pay the full amount of

the required [filing] fee.” Hubbard v. Haley, et al., 262 F.3d 1194, 1195 (11th Cir. 2001).

Consequently, multiple prisoners are not entitled to enjoin their claims in a single cause of

action. Id. Accordingly, the Clerk of this court is hereby DIRECTED to:

1. Open two (2) separate civil actions - one for each Plaintiff named in the instant

complaint. The Clerk is advised that the case number of the present cause of action shall be

assigned to Frederick Ross; 

2. Assign the newly opened case to the Magistrate Judge and District Judge to which

the instant cause of action is assigned; 

Case 2:06-cv-00783-ID-SRW Document 1 Filed 08/31/2006 Page 1 of 2
2

3. Place a copy of the complaint and the in forma pauperis affidavit filed by inmates

Ross and Greer in the newly opened case file; 

4. Refer these case files to the appropriate Magistrate Judge for further proceedings.

DONE, this 31st day of August, 2006.

/s/ Susan Russ Walker 

SUSAN RUSS WALKER

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00783-ID-SRW Document 1 Filed 08/31/2006 Page 2 of 2
###### Editorial Note on Subpart A of Part 989

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 989 appear at 83 FR 53973, Oct. 26, 2018.

#### § 989.86 Separability.

If any provision of this amended subpart is declared invalid, or the applicability thereof to any person, circumstance, or thing is held invalid, the validity of the remainder of this amended subpart or the applicability thereof to any other person, circumstance, or thing shall not be affected thereby.
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under

the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

For the Fifth Circuit

No. 02-21007

Summary Calendar

ERIC L. STEVENS,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

VERSUS

GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY, also 

known as Goodyear Chemical,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

For the Southern District of Texas, Houston Division

H-01-CV-1371

February 21, 2003

Before DAVIS, WIENER and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

For essentially the reasons stated in the district court’s

careful memorandum and order of July 31, 2002, we agree that

Stevens’ summary judgment evidence failed to establish a prima

facie case that he was “disabled” within the meaning of the ADA.

The judgement of the district court is therefore
2

AFFIRMED.
STEAM ELECTRIC CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE

EPA-HQ-OW-2009-0819

 DCN: SE01825A55

THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT 

CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION 

(CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.