alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: Riley, Marianne (MJ)

Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2012 10:37 AM

To: Alexander, Lillian (DEQ)

Subject: ADCOTE 76R36B/9L7 Diisocyanate Information (1-9QMS07)

Attachments: ADCOTE(TM) 76R36B MSDS-US.PDF; COREACTANT 9L7 MSDS-US.PDF; 

ADCOTETM 76R36B, rev 2012, CPDS.pdf; COREACTANT 9L7, rev 2012, CPDS.PDF

Subject: ADCOTETM 76R36B/COREACTANT 9L7 Adhesive System

Dear Ms. Alexander,

In response to your question of September 18 2012, copied and pasted here:

Thank you for sending the CPDS for Coreactant 9L7. My interest is not how much Hexamethylene 

Diisocyanate (H-D) is in Coreactant 9L7, but how much is emitted to the atmosphere. It is my 

understanding that the purpose of the H-D in the coreactant is to facilitate a reaction and that all of the 

H-D would not be expected to be emitted to the atmosphere. How much of the H-D will react or bond 

in the process and will not be emitted to the atmosphere? 

As stated in the MSDS and CPDS (attached), ADCOTETM 76R36B does not contain isocyanates, while 

COREACTANT 9L7 contains approximately 0.5% Hexamethylene Diisocyanate (HMDI), as supplied in the 

original unopened container. At the recommended mix ratio of 100 parts ADCOTE 76R36B to 4 parts 

COREACTANT 9L7, the theoretical HMDI concentration in the wet adhesive blend is estimated to be 

approximately 0.0192% by weight, or 192 ppm.

The diisocyanate is consumed (reacts with the polyester polymer) during the drying and curing process. 

The finished laminate structure is not expected to contain any residual diisocyanate. Our customers are 

expected to use our Adhesive Systems in an industrial setting according to the guidelines stated in the 

Material Safety Data Sheet, including proper ventilation and environmental controls. 

Our information is based upon the theoretical compositions. We are disclosing this information, to the 

best of our knowledge, based upon data from our raw material suppliers and knowledge of our 

manufacturing processes. We believe our information to be accurate and reliable as of this date.

Best Regards,

Marianne

Marianne Riley
Product Specialist – Performance Plastics

Customer Information Group

Dow Business Services LLC, Market & Sales Solutions

2007 Austin, Midland, MI 48674

E-mail: mjcikaloriley@dow.com

This information is considered accurate and reliable as of the date appearing above and is presented in 

good faith. Because use conditions and applicable laws may differ from one location to another and 

may change with time, recipient is responsible for determining whether the information in this 

document is appropriate for recipient's use. Since Dow has no control over how this information may 

ultimately be used, all liability is expressly disclaimed and Dow assumes no obligation or liability 

therefore. No warranty, expressed or implied, is given nor is freedom from any patent owned by The 

Dow Chemical Company or others to be inferred.
Case 2:06-cv-00717-ID-SRW Document 18 Filed 11/07/2006 Page 1 of 1
Case 2:06-cr-00209-MHT-CSC Document 10 Filed 09/07/2006 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 10.5
 INTEGRA BANK CORPORATION
2007 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN
(As amended April 15, 2009)
 Plan Purpose
 Definitions
 Affiliate
 Award
 Award Agreement
 Base Value
 Board
 Cause
 Change in Control




---



##### 



2




---



##### 



Code
 Committee
 Company
 Continuous Service
 Director
 Disability
 EBITDA
 Employee
 Exchange Act
 Exercise Price
 Incentive Stock Option
 Market Value
 Non-Qualified Stock Option
 Option
 Participant
 Performance Cycle
  3




---



##### 



Performance Goals
 
    
    Return on assets
    
    Return on equity
    
    Return on capital
    
    Return on revenues
    
    Cash return on tangible equity
    
    Net income
    
    Operating income
    
    Efficiency ratio
    
    Loan portfolio growth
    
    Core deposit growth
    
    Cash flow
    
    Book value
    
    Stock price performance
    
    Earnings per share
    
    Price earnings ratio
    
    Credit quality
    
    Net interest margin
    
    Non-interest income
    
    Core earnings
    
    Total shareholder return
 Performance Shares
 Performance Unit
 Plan
 Reorganization
 Restricted Period
 Restricted Shares
 Retirement th
 Securities Act
 Shares
 Stock SARs
 Administration; Performance Conditions .
   4




---



##### 



Participants .
 Substitute Options.
 Shares Subject to Plan, Limitations on Grants and Exercise Price .
      5




---



##### 



General Terms and Conditions of Options .
   Exercise of Options.
    6




---



##### 



Termination of Options .
         7




---



##### 



Restrictive Covenants .
 Incentive Stock Options .
   Terms and Conditions of Restricted Shares .
     8




---



##### 



Performance Shares and Performance Units .
      9




---



##### 



Stock SARs
       Adjustments Upon Changes in Capitalization
  10




---



##### 



Effect of Reorganization
    Effect of Change of Control .
   Assignments and Transfers
  11




---



##### 



Employee Rights Under the Plan
 Delivery and Registration of Shares
 Withholding Tax
 Deferrals
 Termination, Amendment and Modification of Plan
 Effective Date and Term of Plan .
  12




---



##### 



Code Section 409A .
   Governing Law .
 Repricing of Options
 Prior Plans .
  13
COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS

IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF JOSE LIDIO ROMO ,

Appellant s
. § § § § § § § No. 08

- 1 6

- 00 0 34

- CV

Appeal from the
Probate Court No. 1
of El Paso County, Texas (TC# 2009

- P00624 )

O R D E R The Court has considered the Appellant’s motion to file the clerk’s record and reporter’s record previously filed in cause number 08

- 13

- 00271

- CV and concludes that the motion should be GRANTED in part. Appellant’s request to file the Appellant’s brief pre viously filed in cause
number 08

- 13

- 00271

- CV is DENIED. The clerk’s record filed on September 26, 2013, the supplemental clerk’s record filed on December 17, 2013, and the reporter’s record filed on October 31, 2013 in cause number 08

- 13

- 00271

- CV will be filed in the above styled and numbered cause. The Clerk’s record does not contain a final judgment. Consequently, Appellant shall request and make financial arrangements to pay for a supplemental clerk’s record containing the final judgment and any othe r documents necessary for this appeal. The supplemental clerk’s record is due to be filed in this Court no later than May 14, 2016. Appellant’s brief shall be due thirty days from the date the supplemental clerk’s record is filed.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 1 4 th day of April , 201 6

. PER CURIAM Before McClure , C.J., R odriguez and Hughes , JJ.
#### Celestine Williams, Appellant, v Long Island Rail Road, Respondent, et al., Defendant.

[816 NYS2d 153]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Kitzes, J.), dated January 24, 2005, which granted the motion of the defendant Long Island Rail Road for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is denied, and the complaint is reinstated against the defendant Long Island Rail Road.

The plaintiff alleged that as she was ascending a staircase at the Long Island Rail Road (hereinafter the LIRR) Jamaica Station, she fell due to a defect in the staircase. The Supreme Court granted the LIRR’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it. The plaintiff appeals. We reverse.

The LIRR satisfied its prima facie burden of establishing its entitlement to judgment as a matter of law *(see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp.,*68 NY2d 320, 324 [1986]). In opposition, however, the plaintiff raised a triable issue of fact *(see Zuckerman v City of New York,*49 NY2d 557, 562 [1980]).

For a landowner to be liable in tort, the plaintiff must establish “that a defective condition existed, and that the landowner either affirmatively created the condition, or had actual or constructive notice of its existence” *(Castellitto v Atlantic & Pac. Co.,*244 AD2d 379, 380 [1997]). “[Wjhether a dangerous or defective condition exists on the property of another so as to create liability depends on the peculiar facts and circumstances of each case and is generally a question of fact for the jury” *(Trincere v County of Suffolk,*90 NY2d 976, 977 [1997] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]).

*901In this case, the affidavit of the plaintiffs expert, together with the plaintiffs deposition testimony describing how her foot became caught in a hole in the back of a step, and the photographs of the staircase, raised a triable issue of fact regarding whether the condition of the staircase presented a tripping hazard. Moreover, based upon, inter alia, the worn condition of the staircase, as depicted in the photographs submitted, the plaintiff raised a triable issue of fact as to whether the LIRR had constructive notice of the alleged dangerous condition *(see e.g. Batton v Elghanayan,*43 NY2d 898, 899-900 [1978]).

Accordingly, the Supreme Court should have denied the LIRR’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it. Mastro, J.P., Rivera, Skelos and Covello, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3395 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3395

  To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain high tenacity 
                          rayon filament yarn.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 6, 2006

  Mr. DeMint introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To extend the temporary suspension of duty on certain high tenacity 
                          rayon filament yarn.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF CERTAIN EXISTING DUTY SUSPENSIONS.

    (a) Existing Duty Suspensions.--Heading 9902.05.07 of the 
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (relating to high 
tenacity yarn of viscose rayon with a decitex of less than 1000) is 
amended by striking the date in the effective period column and 
inserting ``12/31/2009''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) apply to 
goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 
the 15th day after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

) 

V. ) CR. NO. 3:06cr191-MHT

)

SPRING M. DAWSON )

MOTION FOR LEAVE TO DISMISS INDICTMENT WITHOUT PREJUDICE

Comes now the United States of America, by and through Leura G. Canary, United

States Attorney for the Middle District of Alabama, and moves the Court to Dismiss the

Indictment without Prejudice heretofore filed in the above-styled cause as to Spring M. Dawson

on the following grounds, to wit: Ms. Dawson signed a pre-trial diversion agreement on August

23, 2007. 

 Respectfully submitted this the 30th day of August, 2007.

Respectfully submitted,

LEURA G. CANARY

 UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

/s/Kent B. Brunson

 KENT B. BRUNSON

 Assistant United States Attorney

 131 Clayton Street

 Montgomery, Alabama 36104

 Phone: (334) 223-7280

 FAX: (334) 223-7135

 E-mail: kent.brunson@usdoj.gov 

Case 3:06-cr-00191-MHT-CSC Document 25 Filed 08/30/2007 Page 1 of 2
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

 )

 v. ) CR NO. 3:06cr191-MHT

 )

SPRING M. DAWSON )

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on August 30, 2007, I electronically filed the foregoing with the

Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing to the

following: Jennifer Hart, Esq.

Respectfully submitted,

/s/Kent B. Brunson

KENT B. BRUNSON

131 Clayton Street

Montgomery, AL 36104

Phone: (334) 223-7280

FAX: (334) 223-7135

E-mail: kent.brunson@usdoj.gov

Case 3:06-cr-00191-MHT-CSC Document 25 Filed 08/30/2007 Page 2 of 2
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

) 

V. ) CR. NO. 3:06cr191-MHT

)

SPRING M. DAWSON )

O R D E R

Upon consideration of the Motion for Leave to Dismiss Indictment without

Prejudice heretofore filed in the above styled cause, and for good cause shown, the Court

is of the opinion that the motion should be and the same hereby is granted. It is,

therefore, CONSIDERED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by the Court that

said motion be and the same is hereby granted.

DONE this ________day of August, 2007.

 _____________________________________

 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cr-00191-MHT-CSC Document 25-2 Filed 08/30/2007 Page 1 of 1
2149.002 Applicability.

(a) Termination.

(1) Termination of FEGLI Program contracts is controlled by 5 U.S.C. 8709(c) and this chapter. The

procedures for termination of FEGLI Program contracts are contained in FAR part 49. For the

purpose of this part, terminate means to discontinue as used in 5 U.S.C. 8709(c).

(2) A life insurance contract entered into by OPM may be terminated by OPM at any time for default

by the Contractor in accordance with the provisions of FAR part 49 and FAR 52.249-8. A life

insurance contract entered into by OPM may be terminated by the Contractor at the end of the

grace period, after default for nonpayment by OPM. Notwithstanding the preceding sentence, the

Contractor will allow OPM an additional 5 days after the end of the grace period to make payment if

the failure to make payment was inadvertent and/or due to circumstances beyond the Government's

control.

(3) A life insurance contract entered into by OPM may be terminated for convenience of the

Government 60 days after the Contractor's receipt of OPM's written notice to terminate.

(4) The Contractor may terminate its contract with OPM at the end of any contract year when notice

of intent to terminate is given to OPM in writing at least 60 days prior to the end of the contract year

(i.e., no later than July 31).

(b) Continuation of services. The services under this contract are of vital interest to the Government

and must be continued without interruption in the event the contract is terminated for the

Contractor's default or OPM's convenience. Consequently, the contract termination procedures

contained in this paragraph must be used in conjunction with section 2137.102 of this chapter,

section 2137.110 of this chapter, and the provisions of the “Continuity of Services” clause at

2152.237-70 of this chapter. The Contractor is not required to continue performance subsequent to

OPM's default for failure to pay premiums in accordance with the provisions of the clause at

2152.249-70(b) of this chapter.

(c) Settlement. The procedures for settlement of contracts after they are terminated are those

contained in FAR part 49.

Parent topic: PART 2149 - TERMINATION OF CONTRACTS
#### § 984.32 To certify.

*To certify* means the issuance of a certification of inspection of walnuts in accordance with regulations issued pursuant to § 984.50.

[88 FR 56748, Aug. 21, 2023]
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

CHRISTINE BENNETT, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:06cv723-MHT

)

ARMY FLEET SUPPORT, LLC, )

)

Defendant. )

ORDER

 For good cause, it is

ORDERED that this matter be and is hereby set for a status conference on November

19, 2007, at 10:00 p.m. in chambers, Room B-401, United States Courthouse Complex, One

Church Street, Montgomery, Alabama. The parties are DIRECTED to attend this

proceeding.

Done this 2nd day of November, 2007.

 /s/Charles S. Coody 

CHARLES S. COODY

CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00723-MHT-CSC Document 53 Filed 11/02/2007 Page 1 of 1
306.501 Requirement.

The Department Competition Advocate for Health and Human Services is located in the Division of

Acquisition.

Parent topic: Subpart 306.5 - Competition Advocates
2408.802-70 Contract clause.

The Contracting Officer shall insert the clause at 2452.208-71, Reproduction of Reports, in

solicitations and contracts where the contractor is required to produce, as an end product,

publications or other written materials.

Parent topic: Subpart 2408.8 - Acquisition of Printing and Related Supplies
# Subpart 2842.6 - Corporate Administrative Contracting Officer

**Parent topic:**PART 2842 - CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION AND AUDIT SERVICES

## 2842.602 Assignment and location.

The HCA or designee is the agency head for the purposes of FAR 42.602(a).
Editorial Note on Part 91
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 91 appear at 61 FR 51350, Oct. 2 1996.

§ 91.36 Appeal laboratory certificate. ( a ) An appeal laboratory certificate shall be issued showing the results of such appealed analysis. This certificate shall supersede the laboratory certificate previously issued for the commodity product involved.
( b ) Each appeal laboratory certificate shall clearly identify the number and date of the laboratory certificate which it supersedes. The superseded certificate shall become null and void upon the issuance of the appealed laboratory certificate and shall no longer represent the analytical results of the commodity product.
( c ) The individual issuing an appeal laboratory certificate shall forward notice of such issuance to such persons as he or she considers necessary to prevent misuse of the superseded certificate if the original and all copies of such superseded certificate have not previously been delivered to the individual issuing the appeal certificate.
( d ) The provisions in the regulations in this part concerning forms and certificates, issuance of certificates, and retention and disposition of certificates shall apply to appeal laboratory certificates, except that copies of such appeal certificates shall be furnished to all interested parties who received copies of the superseded certificate.
1515.606-70 Contracting methods.       The Department of Housing and Urban Development-Independent Agencies Appropriation Act contains a requirement that none of the funds provided in the Act may be used for payment through grants or contracts to recipients that do not share in the cost of conducting research resulting from proposals that are not specifically solicited by the Government. Accordingly, contracts for research which result from unsolicited proposals shall provide for the contractor to bear a portion of the cost of performance for work subject to the Act. The extent of the cost sharing shall reflect the mutuality of interest of the contractor and the Government. Therefore, where there is no measurable gain to the performing organization, cost sharing is not required.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 1515.6 - Unsolicited Proposals
Exhibit 35.4



|cmyk_letterhead      | CommercialMortgage Servicing
|-------------------- | ----------------------------
|D1086-120,12th Floor
|550SouthTryonStreet 
|Charlotte, NC 28202 
|1-800-326-1334      







ANNUAL
STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE



Reference
is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of September 1, 2012, by and among Citigroup Commercial
Mortgages Securities Inc., as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, Midland Loan Services, a
division of PNC Bank, National Association, as Special Servicer, Situs Holdings, LLC, as Operating Advisor, Citibank, N.A., as
Certificate Administrator and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates
Series CGCMT 2012-GC8 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings
assigned in the Agreement.



Pursuant
to Section 10.08 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify
that:



| | 1. | A
                                         review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from January 1, 2015
                                         through December 31, 2015 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance
                                         per the Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To
                                         the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all
                                         of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting
                                         Period.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------









IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 4th day of March 2016.









|/s/ Daniel Bober        
|------------------------
|Daniel Bober            
|Executive Vice President
|Wells Fargo Bank        



















|Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. |  | 
|---------------------- |  |
1816.001 Definitions.       As used in this part—          *Earned award fee* means the payment of the full amount of an award fee evaluation period's score/rating.          *Term-determining official* means the designated Agency official who reviews the recommendations of the Award-Term Board in determining whether the contractor is eligible for an award term.          *Unearned award fee* means the difference between the available award fee pool amount for a given award fee evaluation period less the contractor's earned award fee amount for that same evaluation period.    **Parent topic:** PART 1816—TYPES OF CONTRACTS
#### § 1041.102 Application.

This part applies to all programs or activities conducted by the agency.
#### Joan Messner, Appellant, v 112 East 83rd Street Tenants Corp. et al., Respondents.

Submitted September 24, 2007;

decided November 19, 2007

Reported below, 42 AD3d 356.

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

 _____________________________

JAMES TYRONE EDWARDS, *

#244 859

Plaintiff, *

v. * 3:06-CV-740-MHT

SGT. MOORE, et al., *

Defendants. *

 ______________________________

ORDER ON MOTION

Upon consideration of Defendants' Motion for Extension of Time, and for good cause,

it is ORDERED that:

1. Defendants' Motion for Extension of Time (Doc. No. 16) is GRANTED; and

2. Defendants are GRANTED an extension from November 13, 2006 to December

5, 2006 to file their answer and written report.

DONE, this 14th day of November 2006.

 /s/Susan Russ Walker 

SUSAN RUSS WALKER

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-00740-MHT-SRW Document 17 Filed 11/14/2006 Page 1 of 1