alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case 2:06-cv-00648-MHT-VPM Document 6 Filed 07/20/2006 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:06-cv-00648-MHT-VPM Document 6 Filed 07/20/2006 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:06-cv-00737-WKW-SRW Document 13 Filed 10/23/2006 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:06-cv-00737-WKW-SRW Document 13 Filed 10/23/2006 Page 2 of 2
Editorial Note on Part 2
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

§ 2.307 Extension and reduction of time limits; delegated authority to order use of procedures for access by potential parties to certain sensitive unclassified information. ( a ) Except as otherwise provided by law, the time fixed or the period of time prescribed for an act that is required or allowed to be done at or within a specified time, may be extended or shortened either by the Commission or the presiding officer for good cause, or by stipulation approved by the Commission or the presiding officer.
( b ) If this part does not prescribe a time limit for an action to be taken in the proceeding, the Commission or the presiding officer may set a time limit for the action.
( c ) In circumstances where, in order to meet Commission requirements for intervention, potential parties may deem it necessary to obtain access to safeguards information (as defined in § 73.2 of this chapter) or to sensitive unclassified non-safeguards information, the Secretary is delegated authority to issue orders establishing procedures and timelines for submitting and resolving requests for this information.
[69 FR 2236, Jan. 14, 2004, as amended at 73 FR 10980, Feb. 29, 2008]
Subpart 3024.1—Protection of Individual

Privacy

Parent topic: PART 3024—PROTECTION OF PRIVACY AND FREEDOM OF INFORMATION

3024.102-70 General.

Procedures for implementing the Privacy Act of 1974 are contained in Departmental regulations

under 6 CFR part 5, subpart B, Privacy Act.
§ 205.375 Guidelines defining inadequate fuel or energy supply. An inadequate utility system fuel inventory or energy supply is a matter of managerial and engineering judgment based on such factors as fuels in stock, fuels en route, transportation time, and constraints on available storage facilities. A system may be considered to have an inadequate fuel or energy supply capability when, combined with other conditions, the projected energy deficiency upon the applicant's system without emergency action by the DOE, will equal or exceed 10 percent of the applicant's then normal daily net energy for load, or will cause the applicant to be unable to meet its normal peak load requirements based upon use of all of its otherwise available resources so that it is unable to supply adequate electric service to its ultimate customers. The following conditions will be considered in determining that a system has inadequate fuel or energy supply capability: ( 1 ) System coal stocks are reduced to 30 days (or less) of normal burn days and a continued downward trend in stock is projected;
( 2 ) System residual oil stocks are reduced to 15 days (or less) of normal burn days and a continued downward trend in stocks is projected;
( 3 ) System distillate oil stocks which cannot be replaced by alternate fuels are reduced to 15 days (or less) of normal burn days and a continued downward trend in stocks is projected;
( 4 ) System natural gas deliveries which cannot be replaced by alternate fuels have been or will be reduced 20 percent below normal requirements and no improvement in natural gas deliveries is projected within 30 days;
( 5 ) Delays in nuclear fuel deliveries will extend a scheduled refueling shutdown by more than 30 days; and
( 6 ) Water supplies required for power generation have been reduced to the level where the future adequacy of the power supply may be endangered and no near term improvement in water supplies is projected.
The use of the prescribed criteria does not preclude an applicant from claiming the existence of an emergency when its stocks of fuel or water exceed the amounts and time frames specified above.
EXHIBIT 32.2


             CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT PURSUANT TO
      SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


         The undersigned hereby certifies that he is the duly appointed and
acting Chief Financial Officer of Techdyne, Inc., a Florida corporation (the
"Company") and hereby certifies as follows:

                  (1) The periodic report containing financial statements to
which this certificate is an exhibit fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

                  (2) The information contained in the periodic report to which
this certificate is an exhibit fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

         In witness whereof, the undersigned has executed and delivered this
certificate as of the date set forth opposite his signature below.


August 14, 2003                                          /s/ David L. Watts
                                                         -----------------------
                                                         David L. Watts
                                                         Chief Financial Officer
§ 785.1 General. ( a ) States meeting conditions specified in this part may have their mediation programs certified by the Farm Service Agency (FSA) and receive Federal grant funds for the operation and administration of agricultural mediation programs.
( b ) U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) agencies participate in mediations pursuant to agency rules governing their informal appeals processes. Where mediation of an agency decision by a Certified Mediation Program is available to participants in an agency program as part of the agency's informal appeal process, the agency will offer a participant receiving notice of an agency decision the opportunity to mediate the decision under the State's Certified Mediation Program, in accordance with the agency's informal appeals regulations in this chapter.
( c ) USDA agencies making mediation available as part of the agency informal appeals process may execute memoranda of understanding with a certified mediation program concerning procedures and policies for mediations during agency informal appeals that are not inconsistent with this part or other applicable regulations. Each such memorandum of understanding will be deemed part of the grant agreement governing the operation and administration of a State certified mediation program receiving Federal grant funds under this part.
( d ) A mediator in a Certified Mediation Program under this part has no authority to make decisions that are binding on parties to a dispute.
( e ) No person may be compelled to participate in mediation provided through a mediation Certified Mediation Program under this part. This paragraph (e) shall not affect a State law requiring mediation before foreclosure on agricultural land or property.
[67 FR 57315, Sept. 10, 2002, as amended at 87 FR 13125, Mar. 9, 2022]
157 So.2d 235

#### Julian CAVALIER v. PEERLESS INSURANCE COMPANY OF KEENE, NEW HAMPSHIRE.

No. 46976.

Nov. 12, 1963.

Court of Appeal, First Circuit.

156 So.2d 105.

It is ordered that the writ of review issue; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be noti-. fied.
§ 205.4 Filing of documents. ( a ) Any document, including, but not limited to, an application, request, complaint, petition and other documents submitted in connection therewith, filed with the DOE or a State Office under this chapter is considered to be filed when it has been received by the DOE National Office, a Regional Office or a State Office. Documents transmitted to the DOE must be addressed as required by § 205.12. All documents and exhibits submitted become part of an DOE or a State Office file and will not be returned.
( b ) Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph (a) of this section, an appeal, a response to a denial of an appeal or application for modification or recision in accordance with §§ 205.106(a)(3) and 205.135(a)(3), respectively, a reply to a notice of probable violation, the appeal of a remedial order or remedial order for immediate compliance, a response to denial of a claim of confidentiality, or a comment submitted in connection with any proceeding transmitted by registered or certified mail and addressed to the appropriate office is considered to be filed upon mailing.
( c ) Hand-delivered documents to be filed with the Office of Exceptions and Appeals shall be submitted to Room 8002 at 2000 M Street, NW., Washington, D.C. All other hand-delivered documents to be filed with the DOE National Office shall be submitted to the Executive Secretariat at 12th and Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, D.C. Hand-delivered documents to be filed with a Regional Office shall be submitted to the Office of the Regional Administrator. Hand-delivered documents to be filed with a State Office shall be submitted to the office of the chief executive officer of such office.
( d ) Documents received after regular business hours are deemed filed on the next regular business day. Regular business hours for the DOE National Office are 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. Regular business hours for a Regional Office or a State Office shall be established independently by each.
----

**Citizens      Financial Corp.**

**Certification      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley**

**Act      of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350**

| 1. | the                Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the company for the quarterly period                ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission                on the date hereof (the “report”) fully complies with the requirements of                Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | the                information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                company. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  | 8/8/07 |   | /s/                Thomas K. Derbyshire       |   |
|--------|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |   |   | Thomas                K. Derbyshire           |
|   |   |   | Vice                President, Treasurer, and |
|   |   |   | Principal                Financial Officer    |

----
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND

, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

J ames Craig Cooper

, * From the 70 th District Court

of Ector County,

Trial Court No. D

- 18

- 2074

- CR

.

Vs. No. 11

- 1 9

- 00 225

- CR * July 22 , 20 2 1

The State of Texas

, * Memorandum Opinion by Williams , J.

(P anel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,

Williams , J. , and Wright, S.C.J.,

sitting by assignment )

(Trotter, J., not participating)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is no

error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court ’ s opi nion,

the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
EX-34.3


(logo) pwc


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors, PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.:

We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying Report on
Assessment of Compliance with Regulation AB Servicing Criteria, that Midland
Loan Services, a division of PNC Bank, National Association ("Midland" or the
"Company") complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the
Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for the commercial
mortgage-backed securities transactions (the "Platform"), as of December 31,
2013 and for the year then ended, excluding criteria 1122(d)(1)(iii),
1122(d)(3)(i)(B), 1122(d)(3)(i)(C), 1122(d)(3)(i)(D), 1122(d)(3)(ii),
1122(d)(3)(iii), 1122(d)(3)(iv), and 1122(d)(4)(xv), which the Company has
determined are not applicable to the servicing activities performed by it with
respect to the Platform. Management is responsible for the Company's compliance
with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on
management's assertion based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly,
included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance
with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as
we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing
of selected asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform,
testing of selected servicing activities related to the Platform, and
determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and
performed those selected activities in compliance with the applicable servicing
criteria. Our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing
activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report.
Our procedures were not designed to detect noncompliance arising from errors
that may have occurred prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have
affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during
the period covered by this report. We believe that our examination provides a
reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal
determination on the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, management's assertion that Midland complied with the
aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2013 for the Platform is fairly stated, in all material respects.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

February 24, 2014


PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, 1100 Walnut, Suite 1300, Kansas City, MO 64106
T: (816) 472 7921, F: (816) 218 1890, www.pwc.com/us
Subpart 1514.2 - Solicitation of Bids

Parent topic: PART 1514 - SEALED BIDDING

1514.201 Preparation of invitations for bids.

1514.201-6 Solicitation provisions.

The Contracting Officer shall insert the solicitation provision at 1552.214-71, Contract Award-Other

Factors-Sealed Bidding, in invitations for bids when it is appropriate to describe other factors that

will be used in evaluating bids for award.

1514.201-7 Contract clauses.

The CCO is authorized to waive the inclusion of the clauses at FAR 52.214-27 and 52.214-28, in

accordance with FAR 14.201-7.

1514.205 Solicitation mailing lists.

When a solicitation and all amendments are posted on the Internet with a synopsis providing

information as to how to access the solicitation and all amendments, the CO will need to maintain a

mailing list of only those individuals requesting paper copies from the contract service

center/branch. When possible, the CO should also build an electronic “mailing list” of companies

downloading the solicitation from the Internet.
§ 97.105 Denial of an application. ( a ) If the variety is found by the examiner to be not new, distinct, uniform, and stable, the application shall be denied.
( b ) In denying an application, the examiner shall cite the reasons the application was denied. When a reason involves the citation of certain material which is complex, the particular part of the material relied on shall be designated as nearly as practicable. The pertinence of each reason, if not obvious, shall be clearly explained.
( c ) If prior domestic certificates are cited as a reason for denial, their numbers and dates and the names of the owners shall be stated. If prior foreign certificates or rights are cited, as a reason for denial, their nationality or country, numbers and dates, and the names of the owners shall be stated, and such other data shall be furnished, as may be necessary to enable the applicant to identify the cited certificates or rights.
( d ) If printed publications are cited as a reason for denial, the author (if any), title, date, pages or plates, and places of publication, or place where a copy can be found shall be given.
( e ) When a denial is based on facts known to the examiner, and upon request by the applicant, the denial shall be supported by the affidavit of the examiner. Such affidavit shall be subject to contradiction or explanation by the affidavits of the applicant and other persons.
( f ) Abandoned applications may not be cited as reasons for denial.
[58 FR 42435, Aug. 9, 1993, as amended at 60 FR 17189, Apr. 4, 1995]
§ 205.151 Criteria for issuance. ( a ) A ruling may be issued, in the discretion of the General Counsel, whenever there have been a substantial number of inquiries with regard to similar factual situations or a particular section of the regulations.
( b ) The General Counsel may issue a ruling whenever it is determined that it will be of assistance to the public in applying the regulations to a specific situation.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Herbert B.
Grimes, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the annual report of
Vaughan Foods, Inc., on Form 10-K for the annual report period ended December
31, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in such Form 10-K
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of Vaughan Foods, Inc.

|                      |                                        
|--------------------- | ---------------------------------------
|Date: April
 15, 2009 | /s/ Herbert
 B. Grimes                 
|                      |                                        
|                      | Herbert B.
 Grimes                     
|                      | Chairman of
 the Board of Directors and
|                      | Chief
 Executive Officer               
|                      |                                        
|                      | (Principal
 Executive Officer)         

I, Gene P.
Jones, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the annual report of
Vaughan Foods, Inc., on Form 10-K for the annual report period ended December
31, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in such Form 10-K
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of Vaughan Foods, Inc.

|                      |                               
|--------------------- | ------------------------------
|Date: April
 15, 2009 | /s/ Gene
 Jones               
|                      |                               
|                      | Gene Jones                    
|                      | Chief
 Financial Officer      
|                      | (Principal
 Financial Officer)

A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has
been provided to Vaughan Foods, Inc. and will be retained by Vaughan Foods,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request. This certification accompanies the Form 10-K to which it relates, is
not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities
Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
(whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-K), irrespective of any
general incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
§ 927.60 Inspection and certification. ( a ) Handlers shall ship only fresh pears inspected by the Federal-State Inspection Service or under a program developed by the Federal-State Inspection Service: except, that such inspection and certification of shipments of pears may be performed by such other inspection service as the Fresh Pear Committee, with the approval of the Secretary, may designate. Promptly after shipment of any pears, the handler shall submit, or cause to be submitted, to the Fresh Pear Committee a copy of the inspection certificate issued on such shipment.
( b ) Any handler may ship pears, on any one conveyance and in such quantity as the committee, with the approval of the Secretary, may prescribe, exempt from the inspection and certification requirements of paragraph (a) of this section.
( c ) The Fresh Pear Committee may, with the approval of the Secretary, prescribe rules and regulations modifying or eliminating the requirement for mandatory inspection and certification of shipments: Provided, That an adequate method of ensuring compliance with quality and size requirements is developed.
Editorial Note on Part 2
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

§ 2.339 Expedited decisionmaking procedure. ( a ) The presiding officer may determine a proceeding by an order after the conclusion of a hearing without issuing an initial decision, when: ( 1 ) All parties stipulate that the initial decision may be omitted and waive their rights to file a petition for review, to request oral argument, and to seek judicial review;
( 2 ) No unresolved substantial issue of fact, law, or discretion remains, and the record clearly warrants granting the relief requested; and
( 3 ) The presiding officer finds that dispensing with the issuance of the initial decision is in the public interest.
( b ) An order entered under paragraph (a) of this section is subject to review by the Commission on its own motion within forty (40) days after its date.
( c ) An initial decision may be made effective immediately, subject to review by the Commission on its own motion within thirty (30) days after its date, except as otherwise provided in this chapter, when: ( 1 ) All parties stipulate that the initial decision may be made effective immediately and waive their rights to file a petition for review, to request oral argument, and to seek judicial review;
( 2 ) No unresolved substantial issue of fact, law, or discretion remains and the record clearly warrants granting the relief requested; and
( 3 ) The presiding officer finds that it is in the public interest to make the initial decision effective immediately.
( d ) The provisions of this section do not apply to an initial decision directing the issuance of a limited work authorization under 10 CFR 50.10, an early site permit under subpart A of part 52 of this chapter, a construction permit or construction authorization, a combined license under subpart C of part 52 of this chapter, or a manufacturing license under subpart F of part 52.
[69 FR 2236, Jan. 14, 2004, as amended at 72 FR 49475, Aug. 28, 2007]