alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 13.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER 

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350) 

 

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Sibanye Gold Limited (the “Company”) for the period ended December 31, 2015 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Charl Keyter, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

|  | 1 |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--|---|--|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | 2 |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--|---|--|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

Date: 21 March 2016 

| \                       |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
|                    |   |
| /s/ Charl Keyter        |   |
| Charl Keyter            |   |
| Chief Financial Officer |   |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE JUNE 30,
1999 FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           3,924
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                    78
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     36,042
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           7,374
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             7,420
<LOANS>                                         86,851
<ALLOWANCE>                                        875
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 138,052
<DEPOSITS>                                     113,571
<SHORT-TERM>                                     5,967
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                924
<LONG-TERM>                                        978
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,500
<OTHER-SE>                                      15,112
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 138,052
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  3,735
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,265
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    22
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 5,022
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               1,809
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,954
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            3,068
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       85
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  13
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  2,213
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,044
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       1,044
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       715
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.08
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.87
<LOANS-NON>                                         84
<LOANS-PAST>                                        22
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,109
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      377
<RECOVERIES>                                        58
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  875
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               875
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            100


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32





Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report of Universal Detection Technology (the "Registrant") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jacques Tizabi, Principal Executive Officer and Acting Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of the Registrant, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Registrant.





Dated: December 7, 2010
/s/ Jacques TizabiJacques Tizabi

Principal Executive Officer and Acting Principal Financial Officer and

Principal Accounting Officer
2806.501 Requirement.       (a) The Director, Office of Acquisition Management (OAM), Justice Management Division (JMD), is designated as the DOJ Competition Advocate.          (b) The HCA or designee for each bureau will appoint an official to be the bureau Competition Advocate. The bureau Competition Advocate shall be vested with the overall responsibility for competition activities within his or her bureau. The delegated bureau Competition Advocate must be at or above the level of the BPC organizationally.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 2806.5 - Advocates for Competition
832.001 Definitions.

As used in this part:

(a) Designated agency office means the office designated by the purchase order, agreement, or

contract to first receive and review invoices. This office can be contractually designated as the

receiving entity. This office may be different from the office issuing the payment.

(b) Electronic form means an automated system transmitting information electronically according to

the accepted electronic data transmission methods identified in 832.7002-1. Facsimile, email, and

scanned documents are not acceptable electronic forms for submission of payment requests.

(c) Payment request means any request for contract financing payment or invoice payment

submitted by a contractor under a contract.

Parent topic: PART 832 - CONTRACT FINANCING
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          27,621
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           1,560
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                24,150
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    204,437
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          29,092
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            29,030
<LOANS>                                        626,403
<ALLOWANCE>                                      6,733
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 956,063
<DEPOSITS>                                     707,089
<SHORT-TERM>                                    31,531
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              5,785
<LONG-TERM>                                     92,179
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        19,786
<OTHER-SE>                                      99,693
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 956,063
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 13,291
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                2,801
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   536
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                16,628
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               5,440
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,496
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           10,132
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      300
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  20
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  5,791
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,025
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       6,025
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,061
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .33
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .33
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.93
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,915
<LOANS-PAST>                                     1,726
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  8,489
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 6,883
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      556
<RECOVERIES>                                        70
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                6,773
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             4,352
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                          2,381
        

</TABLE>
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3373 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Cloquintocet-mexyl. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 5, 2006 

Mr. NELSON of Nebraska introduced the following bill; which was read twice 

and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on Cloquintocet-mexyl. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CLOQUINTOCET-MEXYL. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

7 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.12.57 Acetic acid, 5-chloro-8- 

quinolinoxy-, 1-methylhexyl 

ester (Cloquintocet-mexyl) 

(CAS No. 99607–70–2) 

(provided for in subheading 

2933.49.30) ......................... Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 


cchase on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
2 

•S 3373 IS 

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

3 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

4 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


cchase on PROD1PC60 with BILLS
° O 00 oO’ é ;
CSFII CS O45 Fes — ’ Ss aoe 65
9 SSSR O# ys EE

/ NSS von Ly V4 FE :
5 y Y, iy WY oe Z

DF J ee Oa

YEO) MG A

aX \ 4

73°00'
WILMINGTON CANYON SW

oan SCALE 1:100,000 1s 4 HE z
§ 205.284 Processing of applications. ( a ) The Director of the Office of Hearings and Appeals may appoint an administrator to evaluate Applications under guidelines established by the Office of Hearings and Appeals. The administrator, if he is not a Federal Government employee, may be compensated from the funds referred to in the Remedial Order or Consent Order. The administrator may design and distribute an optional application form for the convenience of the applicants.
( b ) The Office of Hearings and Appeals or its designee may initiate an investigation of any statement made in an Application and may require verification of any document submitted in support of a claim. In evaluating an Application, the Office of Hearings and Appeals or its designee may solicit and consider information obtained from any source and may on its own initiative convene a hearing or conference, if it determines that a hearing or conference will advance its evaluation of an Application.
( c ) The Director of the Office of Hearings and Appeals or his designee shall conduct any hearing or conference convened with respect to an Application for Refund and shall specify the time and place for the hearing or conference and notify the applicant. The official conducting the hearing may administer oaths and affirmations, rule on the presentation of information, receive relevant information, dispose of procedural requests, determine the format of the hearing and otherwise regulate the course of the hearing. The provisions of § 205.8 of this part which relate to subpoenas and witness fees shall apply to any hearing convened with respect to an application for refund, except that § 205.8(h) (2), (3) and (4) shall not apply.
( d ) Upon consideration of an Application and other relevant information received during the course of a refund proceeding, the Director of the Office of Hearings and Appeals or his designee shall issue an order granting or denying the Application. The order shall contain a concise statement of the relevant facts and the legal basis for the order. A copy of the order, with such modification as is necessary to ensure the confidentiality of information protected from public disclosure by 18 U.S.C. 1905, may be obtained upon request by an applicant or any other person who participated in the proceeding.
3042.7000 Contract clause.

The contracting officer shall insert the clause at (HSAR) 48 CFR 3052.242–72, Contracting Officer's

Representative, in solicitations and contracts when it is intended that a representative will be

assigned to the contract to perform functions of a technical nature.

Parent topic: Subpart 3042.70—Contracting Officer's Representative
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

DESMOND RAYNARD BROWN, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D18-4894

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

___________________________________)

Opinion filed October 2, 2019.

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 

9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for 

Pinellas County; Michael F. Andrews, 

Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, 

and Maureen E. Surber, Assistant Public 

Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CASANUEVA, BLACK, and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.
1

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

 )

 v. ) CR. NO. 3:06-cr-210-MEF

 )

MELISSA WARD )

O R D E R

Upon consideration of the motion for writ of habeas corpus ad prosequendum, filed

September 14, 2006, and for good cause shown, it is

ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED. The Clerk of this Court is hereby

DIRECTED to issue a WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS AD PROSEQUENDUM addressed to

Russell County Jail, Phenix City, Alabama, commanding it to deliver Melissa Ward to any

United States Marshal or Deputy United States Marshal, and directing said Marshal or

Deputy to bring said prisoner before this court, to be held at Montgomery, Alabama, on

October 25, 2006, at 10:00 am, and to return the prisoner to said official when the court shall

have finished with her.

Done this 14 day of September, 2006. th

 /s/Charles S. Coody 

CHARLES S. COODY

CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 3:06-cr-00210-MEF-CSC Document 5 Filed 09/14/2006 Page 1 of 1
2929.303 Applications of state and local taxes to Government contractors and subcontractors.       (a) Contractors may only be treated as agents of the Government for the purposes set forth in FAR 29.303(a) upon the written review and approval of the Assistant Secretary for Administration and Management.          (b) Requests for approval under paragraph (a) of this section must be submitted by the HCA through the Office of the Solicitor, to the Division of Acquisition Management Services, for further action.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 2929.3 - State and Local Taxes
Case 1:06-cv-00774-MHT-SRW Document 2 Filed 08/30/2006 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:06-cv-00774-MHT-SRW Document 2 Filed 08/30/2006 Page 2 of 3
Case 1:06-cv-00774-MHT-SRW Document 2 Filed 08/30/2006 Page 3 of 3
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

IN RE: CANVASS OF ABSENTEE AND 

MAIL-IN BALLOTS OF NOVEMBER 3, 2020 

GENERAL ELECTION

PETITION OF: PHILADELPHIA COUNTY 

BOARD OF ELECTIONS

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

Nos. 89-93 EM 2020

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 18th day of November, 2020, the Application for the Court to 

Exercise Extraordinary Jurisdiction over the Commonwealth Court’s Cases Docketed at 

1140 CD 2020, 1139 CD 2020, 1138 CD 2020, 1137 CD 2020, and 1136 CD 2020, filed 

by the Philadelphia County Board of Elections, is hereby GRANTED with respect to the 

following issue:

Does the Election Code require county boards of elections to 

disqualify mail-in or absentee ballots submitted by qualified 

electors who signed their ballot’s outer envelopes but did not 

handwrite their name, their address, and/or a date, where no 

fraud or irregularity has been alleged?

The Commonwealth Court shall immediately transfer the contents of its records for 

these cases to this Court, including the briefs requested and received from the parties.

Chief Justice Saylor and Justice Mundy note their dissent.
Exhibit 10.5


 





 


ALEX YEMENIDJIAN


CHAIRMAN
OF THE BOARD


CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


 


December 4, 2009


 


Mr. Thomas McCartney


9712 Amber Peak Court


Las Vegas, NV 89144


 


Dear Tom:


 


I am very excited you have accepted our offer to take on the leadership role for Tropicana Las Vegas. I am confident this will be a mutually rewarding relationship.


 


This letter confirms my verbal offer to serve as President of Tropicana Las Vegas, reporting directly to me.


 


Your base salary will be $400,000 annually, to be paid in bi-weekly installments of $15,384.61 starting with the first full pay period in January, and subject to deductions for taxes and other withholdings required by law. You will have immediate eligibility for our health insurance benefits as well as the ability to begin contributing to our 401(k) plan on day 1. You will also be receiving an additional bonus in the amount of $100,000, less applicable deductions for taxes and other withholdings required by law, payable after successful completion of one year of employment, or earlier at owner’s discretion. Additionally, you will be eligible for our bonus plan (not yet developed) and additional benefits currently offered or that may be offered in the future. Additionally, the amount of $23,076 will be added to your total bonus eligibility amount the first year the annualized bonus
plan is effective.


 


This offer is effective Friday December 4, 2009. Our standard terms for such offer of employment (i.e. mandatory drug testing and background checks)
are applicable
and nothing contained in this letter shall amend or modify our standard employment agreement terms and conditions. Tropicana Las Vegas Inc. does not offer an employment contract; therefore this letter should not be construed as a contract.


 


We sincerely look forward to you joining our team. In the meantime, please do not
hesitate to contact me if you have any questions.


 


Warmest regards,


 


 


	
  /s/ Alex Yemenidjian

  	
   

  
	
  Alex Yemenidjian

  	
   

  
	
  Chairman of the Board /
  Chief Executive Officer

  	
   

  



 


ACCEPTED AND AGREED TO this
20 Day of December, 2009


 


	
  /s/ Thomas McCartney

  	
   

  



 


3801 Las Vegas Boulevard
South · Las Vegas, Nevada 89109  ·  tropicanalv.com  ·  702.739.2700  ·  alexy@tropicanalv.com
§ 25.8 Information collection requirements: OMB approval. ( a ) The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has submitted the information collection requirements contained in this part to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for approval as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 *et seq.*). The NRC may not conduct or sponsor and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. OMB has approved the information collection requirements contained in this part under control number 3150-0046.
( b ) The approved information collection requirements contained in this part appear in §§ 25.11, 25.17, 25.21, 25.23, 25.25, 25.27, 25.29, 25.31, 25.33, and 25.35.
( c ) This part contains information collection requirements in addition to those approved under the control number specified in paragraph (a) of this section. These information collection requirements and the control numbers under which they are approved are as follows: ( 1 ) In §§ 25.17(b), 25.21(c), 25.27(a), 25.29, and 25.31, NRC Form 237 is approved under control number 3150-0050.
( 2 ) In §§ 25.17(c), 25.21(c), 25.27(b), 25.29, and 25.31, the “Electronic Questionnaire for Investigations Processing (e-QIP), SF-86—Questionnaire for National Security Positions” is approved under control number 3206-0005.
( 3 ) In § 25.21(b), NRC Form 354 is approved under control number 3150-0026.
( 4 ) In § 25.33, NRC Form 136 is approved under control number 3150-0049.
( 5 ) In § 25.35, NRC Form 277 is approved under control number 3150-0051.
[49 FR 19624, May 9, 1984, as amended at 57 FR 3720, Jan. 31, 1992; 62 FR 17687, Apr. 11, 1997; 62 FR 52185, Oct. 6, 1997; 87 FR 45241, July 28, 2022]
2007-0415.

#### Ackison v. Anchor Packing Co.

Lawrence App. No. 05CA46, 2006-Ohio-7099. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Lawrence County. Upon consideration of Owens-Illinois, Inc.’s motion to strike appellee’s merit brief and appendix,

It is ordered by the court that the motion is granted as to Appendices H, I, M and N, which are hereby stricken. The motion to strike is denied in all other respects.

O’Donnell, J., would also strike Appendices F and L.

Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, and Cupp, JJ., dissent.
#### Michael Welt et al., Appellants, v Town of Islip et al., Respondents.

In an action to declare article VA of the Code of the Town of Islip unconstitutional insofar as it applies to plaintiffs’ property (consisting of two lots owned by plaintiff Michael Welt and one lot owned by plaintiff Elizabeth Welt), for a permanent injunction and to review a determination of the Town Board of the Town of Islip denying the application of plaintiff Elizabeth Welt for a special permit, plaintiffs appeal from so much of an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, entered February 21, 1980, as, upon granting relief to Elizabeth Welt on plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment on the first cause of action (for declaratory relief and a permanent injunction), denied similar relief to plaintiff Michael Welt. Order and judgment reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with $50 costs and disbursements, the provisions denying the motion as to Michael Welt are deleted therefrom, summary judgment on the first cause of action is granted as to the lots owned by Michael Welt and the ordinance is declared unconstitutional with respect to those lots. Special Term’s reasons for granting summary judgment to Elizabeth Welt with respect to her lot, No. 30, were equally applicable to Michael Welt’s lots, Nos. 28 and 29. The ordinance permitted erection only of an elevated pedestrian dune crossing or an approved fence. The ordinance was confiscatory and unconstitutional as to Lots Nos. 28 and 29, as well as to Lot No. 30. (See *Matter of Grimpel Assoc. v Cohalan,*41 NY2d 431; *Matter of Lemp v Town Bd. of Town of Islip,*90 Misc 2d 360.) The ordinance’s special permit provision did not change that fact because the ordinance misuses the concept of a special permit exception. (See *Matter of North Shore Steak House v Board of Appeals of Inc. Vil. of Thomaston,*30 NY2d 238.) Under the circumstances, Michael Welt was not required to apply for such a permit prior to bringing suit. (See *Matter of Grimpel Assoc. v Cohalan, supra.)*Damiani, J. P., Gibbons, Gulotta and Weinstein, JJ., concur.