alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### IN THE UNI TED STATES COURT OFAPPEALS FOR THE FIF TH CIRCUIT

No. 11-20520 Summary Calendar MICHAEL FRANCIS PALMA, Plaintiff - Appellant v. HARRIS COUNTY APPRAISAL DISTRICT, Defendant - Appellee
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:11-CV-1966 Before REAVLEY, SMITH, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The district court dismissed Mr. Palma’s suit because federal courts have no jurisdiction of it. Neither it nor we will require the plaintiff to sue the County of Harris instead of the Appraisal District, as would be necessary to obtain the relief he seeks. It does not matter since 28 U.S.C. § 1381 provides that federal courts may not restrain the assessment of state taxes. The appell e e ’ s b ri ef explains why federal courts may not adjudicate the claims of his complaint. He U n i te d S ta te s C o u rt o f A p p ea l s

F i ft h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D Novembe r 4, 2 011 Lyle W . Cayce Clerk

Pursua nt to 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 , the court hasd ete rm inedthat this op inion s houldnot * be publ ish ed and is not pr ece dent excep t unde r the lim ite d cir cum st ance s se t forth in 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 .4. Case: 11-20520 Document: 00511655440 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/04/2011No. 11-20520

may bring su c h a c l a i m in Texas courts, and whether the remedy sought has merit is for the Texas court to decide. AFFIRMED.

2 Case: 11-20520 Document: 00511655440 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/04/2011
Exhibit 31.2.  CERTIFICATION  I, S. E. Parks, certify that:   1. I have reviewed this quarterly report of Questar Pipeline Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and we have:  a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting.  5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):  a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.     May 7, 2008 /s/S. E. Parks S. E. Parks Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
#### § 1050.101 Purpose and scope.

These regulations implement the provisions of the Foreign Gifts and Decorations Act (5 U.S.C. 7342), which establishes policies and procedures pertaining to the acceptance, use, and disposition of gifts or decorations from foreign governments. If an employee of Department of Energy (DOE) meets the requirements of these regulations, he or she is deemed to be in compliance with the DOE Conduct of Employees regulations, 10 CFR part 1010.
§ 1708.115 Final report of safety investigation. ( a ) The Board will complete a final report of the safety investigation fully setting forth the Board's findings and conclusions.
( b ) The final report of the safety investigation is confidential and protected by the safety privilege, and is therefore not releasable.
( c ) The Board, in its discretion, may sanitize the final report of the safety investigation by redacting confidential and safety privileged information so that the report is put in a publically releasable format.
( d ) Nothing in this section voids or otherwise displaces the Board's legal obligations with respect to compliance with the Freedom of Information Act, the Government in the Sunshine Act, or any procedures or requirements contained in the Board's regulations issued pursuant to those Acts.
§ 13.28 Motions. ( a ) Any application to the ALJ for an order or ruling shall be by motion. Motions shall state the relief sought, the authority relied upon, and the facts alleged, and shall be filed with the ALJ and served on all other parties.
( b ) Except for motions made during a prehearing conference or at the hearing, all motions shall be in writing. The ALJ may require that oral motions be reduced to writing.
( c ) Within 15 days after a written motion is served, or such other time as may be fixed by the ALJ, any party may file a response to such motion.
( d ) The ALJ may not grant a written motion before the time for filing responses thereto has expired, except upon consent of the parties or following a hearing on the motion, but may overrule or deny such motion without awaiting a response.
( e ) The ALJ shall make a reasonable effort to dispose of all outstanding motions prior to the beginning of the hearing.
§ 1710.111 Procedures for salary offset. ( a ) *Determination of disposable pay.* The Board will determine an employee's disposable pay (as defined in § 1710.103) and will implement salary offset as described in paragraph (c) of this section, or when requested by another agency, as described in § 1710.113(c). If the debtor is not employed by the Board, the Board will request the agency employing the debtor to determine the amount of the employee's disposable pay and implement salary offset upon request.
( b ) *When salary offset begins.* Deductions will begin within three official pay periods following receipt of the creditor agency's request for offset.
( c ) *Amount of salary offset.* The amount to be offset from each salary payment will be up to 15 percent of a debtor's disposable pay, as follows: ( 1 ) If the amount of the debt is equal to or less than 15 percent of the disposable pay, such debt generally will be collected in one lump sum payment;
( 2 ) Installment deductions will be made over a period of no greater than the anticipated period of employment. An installment deduction will not exceed 15 percent of the disposable pay from which the deduction is made unless the employee has agreed in writing to the deduction of a greater amount. An installment deduction may be less than 15 percent of disposable pay if the creditor agency has determined that smaller deductions are appropriate based on the employee's ability to pay.
( d ) *Final salary payment.* After the employee has separated either voluntarily or involuntarily from the payment agency, the p]ayment agency may make a lump sum deduction exceeding 15 percent of disposable pay from any final salary or other payments pursuant to 31 U.S.C. 3716 in order to satisfy the debt.
( e ) *Multiple debts.* In instances where two or more creditor agencies are seeking salary offset, or where two or more debts are owed to a single creditor agency, the Board's finance office may, at its discretion, determine whether one or more debts should be offset simultaneously within the 15 percent limitation.
( f ) *Precedence of debts owed to the Board.* For Board employees, debts owed to the Board generally take precedence over debts owed to other agencies. In the event that a debt to the Board is certified while an employee is subject to a salary offset to repay another agency, the Board's finance office may decide whether to have that debt repaid in full before collecting its claim or whether changes should be made in the salary deduction being sent to the other agency. If debts owed to the Board can be collected in one pay period, the finance office may suspend the salary offset to the other agency for that pay period in order to liquidate the Board debt.
( g ) *Order of debt collection.* When an employee owes two or more debts, the best interests of the government shall be the primary consideration in determining the order of debt collection. The Board's finance office, in making this determination, will be guided primarily by the statute of limitations that affects the collection of the debt(s).
H. Res. 312

In the House of Representatives, U.S., 

June 27, 2005.

Whereas the President of the United States has issued a 

proclamation designating the month of June 2005 as National Homeownership Month; 

Whereas the national homeownership rate in the United 

States has reached a record high of 69.1 percent and 

more than half of all minority families are homeowners; 

Whereas the people of the United States are one of the besthoused populations in the world; 

Whereas owning a home is a fundamental part of the American dream and is the largest personal investment many 

families will ever make; 

Whereas homeownership provides economic security for homeowners by aiding them in building wealth over time and 

strengthens communities through a greater stake among 

homeowners in local schools, civic organizations, and 

churches; 

Whereas improving homeownership opportunities requires the 

commitment and cooperation of the private, public, and 

nonprofit sectors, including the Federal Government and 

State and local governments; and 

Whereas the current laws of the United States, such as the 

American Dream Downpayment Act, encourage home-
2

•HRES 312 EH 

ownership and should continue to do so in the future: 

Now, therefore, be it 

Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

(1) fully supports the goals and ideals of National 

Homeownership Month; and 

(2) recognizes the importance of homeownership in 

building strong communities and families. 

Attest:

Clerk.
eae, J)
ox

£ yy. d ; sh,

CHINCOTEAGUE NE

CORRECTED METERS SCALE 1:100.000
L-157

auryD

VA! ay 2nlen9
| ash -7

200°0%:)
###### Editorial Note on Part 2

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

#### § 2.1505 Role of the NRC staff.

The NRC staff shall be available to answer any Commission or presiding officer's questions on staff-prepared documents, provide additional information or documentation that may be available to the staff, and provide other assistance that the Commission or presiding officer may request without requiring the NRC staff to assume the role of an advocate. The NRC staff may request to participate in the legislative hearing by providing notice to the Commission or presiding officer, as applicable, within the time period established for submitting a request to participate; or if no notice is provided under § 2.1502(b)(2), within ten (10) days of the Commission's order announcing its determination to conduct a legislative hearing.
#### Carol Weckelman, Respondent, v Gerald Weckelman, Appellant.

(Appeal No. 1.)

Order unanimously modified, and, as modified, affirmed, without costs, in accordance with the following memorandum: Respondent appeals from several orders of Family Court which (1) ordered him to pay $150 per week child support and $250 attorney’s fees to petitioner’s counsel, (2) denied his applications for modification of the support order, and (3) directed judgment for arrears and directed him to post security for further support payments. Respondent first contends that Family Court had no jurisdiction to award child support because he had instituted a divorce action against petitioner which was pending in Supreme Court at the time of petitioner’s application to Family Court. Ordinarily, of course, Family Court does not have jurisdiction under those circumstances and one in petitioner’s position must seek relief by a motion in Supreme Court for temporary alimony and support (see Family Ct Act, § 461, subd [c]; § 464, subd [a]; *La Piana v La Piana,*67 AD2d 966; *Matter of Lo Castro v Lo Castro,*45 AD2d 712). The evidence in this record, however, establishes that when petitioner’s application was made, she was in danger of needing public assistance and that in January, 1979, when the hearing was held on her application in Family Court, she was actually receiving public assistance. Accordingly, Family Court possessed jurisdiction to order respondent to pay support to petitioner and his child, and had jurisdiction to enter the orders appealed, notwithstanding the fact that the court declined to exercise its jurisdiction in favor of respondent’s wife (see Family Ct Act, §§ 411,413,464, subd [b]). We have reviewed the evidence of the parties’ respective resources and needs and find that the court’s original order of support dated February 2, 1979 should be modified by reducing the amount of child support to $125 per week. At the time it was entered, respondent had a gross weekly pay of $275 and we find that he was able to pay the sum of $125 to support his child’s personal needs and maintain the home in which she and petitioner live. In his application for *996modification, respondent urges that subsequently, in February, 1979, his wages were reduced from $275 per week to $225 per week and that this justifies a further reduction in support. The reduction in respondent’s wages occurred when he sold his 50% ownership interest in the business which employed him. The evidence in the record does not establish that his duties or responsibilities changed appreciably after the sale, however, and Family Court could properly disregard the change in financial circumstances as one that respondent imposed upon himself to avoid his support obligations (see *Hickland v Hickland,*39 NY2d 1, cert den 429 US 941; and cf. *Andre v Andre,*78 AD2d 974). We have considered the other points raised by counsel and find that they do not warrant reversal or further modification of the orders appealed. (Appeal from order of Livingston County Family Court — support.) Present — Simons, J. P., Hancock, Jr., Callahan, Doerr and Moule, JJ.
MP IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 18 - 0499 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. SCOTT STEVEN FJELSTED,

Defendant and Appellant.

**GRANT OF EXTENSION** Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 30 -day extension of time, and good cause appearing therefor, Appellee is gran ted an extension of time to and including May 5 , 2020 , within which to prepare, serve, and file its response brief.

Electronically signed by: Bowen Greenwood Clerk of the Supreme Court April 1 2020

04/01/2020
Case Number: DA 18-0499 

## FILED Bowen Greenwood CLERK OF THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF MONTANA 04/01/2020
Case Number: DA 19-0557
#### BRAYER, Appellant, v. FENN, Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

May 27, 1914.)

Action by John F. Brayer against Lily B. M. Fenn, as executrix.

No opinion. Motion for leave to appeal to Court of Appeals granted, and question for review certified. For former decision, see 147 N. Y. Supp. 1100.
EX-35.2
(logo) MIDLAND    (logo) PNC
       LOAN              REAL ESTATE
       SERVICES

OFFICER CERTIFICATE

Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation
Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates
COMM 2012-CCRE5


March 1, 2013

Pursuant to the requirements of that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement
(the "Agreement"), it is hereby certified that on behalf of PNC Bank, National
Association d/b/a Midland Loan Services as successor by merger to Midland Loan
Services, Inc. (the "Servicer"),

(i) a review of the Servicer's activities during the calendar year 2012 (the
"Reporting Period") and of its performance under the Agreement has been made
under the undersigned officer's supervision;
(ii) to the best of the undersigned officer's knowledge, based on such review,
the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all
material respects throughout the Reporting Period or, if there has been a
failure to fulfill any such obligation in any material respect, each such
failure known to the undersigned officer and the nature and status thereof are
set forth below; and

Nature and Status of Failures: None.

PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCATION
d/ba MIDLAND LOAN SERVICES


/s/ Steven W. Smith
Steven W. Smith
Executive Vice President

Member of The PNC Financial Services Group

10851 Mastin Boulevard  Overland Park, Kansas 66210
800-327-8083
www.pnc.com/midland
EXHIBIT 32.2CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

       In connection with the quarterlyreport of CNB Corporation on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2007 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, L.Ford Sanders, II, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of CNBCorporation, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002that:
| 1.     | The  above-listed Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)  or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                 |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                         |
| 2.     | The  information contained in the above-listed Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all  material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the  Company. |
| Date:  May  9, 2007 | /s/L. Ford  Sanders, II             L. Ford Sanders, II  Executive Vice President and  Chief Financial Officer |
|-------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                               |                                                                                                                                                                                 |
Exhibit 32.1

# CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF
EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

I, Brian F. Lavin, certify, pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

To the best of my knowledge and
belief, the quarterly report on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on November 14, 2003, by NTS-Properties VI, a Maryland Limited Partnership (the
Periodic Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Periodic Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of NTS-Properties VI, a Maryland Limited Partnership.

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to NTS-Properties VI, a Maryland
Limited Partnership and will be retained by NTS-Properties VI, a Maryland Limited
Partnership and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

/s/ Brian F. Lavin

---

President of NTS Capital Corporation,
General Partner of NTS-Properties Associates VI,
General Partner of NTS-Properties VI, a Maryland Limited Partnership

---
PGI 210.002 Procedures.       (e)(ii) Contracting officers are encouraged to retain information on potential offerors that express an interest in an acquisition, in order to solicit feedback in instances when only one offer is received on a competitive solicitation (see PGI                 215.371-2             ).          (iii) Contracting officers should ensure that the contract file includes—          (A) The methods used to conduct market research;          (B) The timeframe in which market research was conducted;          (C) The analysis of the capabilities of the potential sources that were identified during market research; and          (D) Any conclusion(s) reached as a result of market research analysis.    **Parent topic:** PGI Part 210 - MARKET RESEARCH
Editorial Note on Part 982
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 982 appear at 61 FR 17559, Apr. 22, 1996.

§ 982.453 Disposition of substandard hazelnuts. The Board shall maintain a list of approved users who are crushers, livestock feed manufacturers, or livestock feeders, and of the locations of the facilities to which substandard hazelnuts may be shipped. Users interested in purchasing substandard hazelnuts or hazelnut waste must make prior application to the Board on F/H Form D to be included on the approved list of such users. Each handler who disposes of substandard hazelnuts to an approved user shall, upon shipment, report to the Board on F/H Form D1 the quantities disposed of or shipped. Substandard hazelnuts disposed of to an approved user may only be shipped directly to an approved location where the crushing, feed manufacture, or feeding is to take place. The Board may deny approval to any user application, or may remove any user from the approved list when such denial or removal is deemed necessary to ensure control over disposition of substandard hazelnuts. This may occur if the Board determines that substandard hazelnuts are not properly shipped to, or utilized at, approved facilities, in compliance with this requirement. F/H Form D includes the location and description of the disposal facilities to be used as well as a certification to the Board and the Secretary of Agriculture that the applicant will: ( a ) Crush, manufacture feed, or feed to livestock such hazelnuts at the location;
( b ) Use such hazelnuts for no other purpose than for crushing into oil, manufacturing into livestock feed, or livestock feeding;
( c ) Permit such inspection of premises and of hazelnuts received and held, and such examination of books and records covering hazelnut transactions as the Board may require;
( d ) Keep a record of receipts, holdings, and use of substandard hazelnuts available for examination by authorized representatives of the Board and the U.S. Department of Agriculture for a period of two years after the end of the marketing year in which the recorded transactions are completed; and
( e ) Make such reports, certified to the Board and the Secretary of Agriculture as to their correctness, as the Board with the approval of the Secretary may require.
[54 FR 24328, June 7, 1989]