alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

 v. )

)

 BRIDGET Y. TAYLOR, ) CR. NO. 2:06CR209-WKW

 a/k/a Bridget Madison

O R D E R

The defendant by consent has appeared before a United States Magistrate Judge and has

entered a plea of guilty. The Magistrate Judge has accepted the plea of guilty and has adjudicated

the defendant guilty. Accordingly, it is ORDERED as follows:

1. That sentencing of the defendant be, and the same is, hereby set on January 22, 2007 at

9:00 a.m. in the Frank M. Johnson, Jr. United States Courthouse Complex, One Church Street,

Montgomery, Alabama.

2. That in accordance with Rule 32(f)(1), Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, on or before

December 27, 2006, counsel for the defendant and the Government shall communicate in writing

to the probation officer, and to each other, any objections they have as to any material information,

sentencing classifications, sentencing guideline ranges, and policy statements contained in or omitted

from the presentence report.

3. That, unless excused in writing by the Chief U.S. Probation Officer of this district,

counsel for the parties shall be available for a conference with the probation officer on January 3,

2007, at 9:00 a.m., to discuss and resolve, if possible, factual and legal issues contained in the

presentence report. If the probation officer determines or if any of the parties request that a personal

meeting be held to resolve the issues, such meeting shall be at the U.S. Probation Office, Frank

M. Johnson, Jr., U. S. Courthouse Complex located at One Church Street, Montgomery, AL,

on the above date and time. Such request for a personal conference shall be made to the probation

officer within five (5) calendar days after receipt of the presentence report. Otherwise, the

conference shall be held telephonically. Any motion for downward departure shall be filed on

or before the conference date with the probation officer, unless based on unknown and

unforeseen circumstances arising after that date, in which case the motion must be filed

promptly upon discovery of such circumstances.

Nothing contained in this Order shall be construed as impairing the rights of any party as

established in the Constitution or laws of the United States.

DONE this 16th day of October, 2006.

 /s/ W. Keith Watkins 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cr-00209-MHT-CSC Document 23 Filed 10/16/2006 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR

THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

ALMA T. McBROOM, )

)

Plaintiff, )

v. ) CASE NO. 2:06-cv-767-MEF

)

JOHN E. POTTER, Postmaster General )

United States Postal Service, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

O R D E R

It is hereby ORDERED that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), this case is referred

to Magistrate Judge Vanzetta P. McPherson for all pretrial proceedings and entry of any

orders or recommendations as may be appropriate.

DONE this the 30th day of August, 2006.

 /s/ Mark E. Fuller 

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00767-MEF-SRW Document 3 Filed 08/30/2006 Page 1 of 1
6.503 Annual reporting requirements.

(b)(2) Procuring organization competition advocates shall submit their annual competition report to

the DLA Acquisition Operations Division by 15 November each year.

Parent topic: SUBPART 6.5 –ADVOCATES FOR COMPETITION
###### Editorial Note on Part 1045

#### Editorial Notes:Nomenclature changes to part 1045 appear at 88 FR 41294, June 26, 2023, and 88 FR 82238, Nov. 24, 2023.

§ 1045.210 How does a person submit an appeal if DOE withholds classified information in an MDR response?

Editorial Notes:

Nomenclature changes to part 1045 appear at 88 FR 41294, June 26, 2023, and 88 FR 82238, Nov. 24, 2023.

(a) When the Director, Office of Classification, denies NSI, RD, FRD, or TFNI, or the NNSA Deputy Director, Deputy Administrator for Naval Reactors, denies Naval Nuclear Propulsion information, in matter requested under an MDR, the requester may appeal the determination to the Director, Office of Environment, Health, Safety and Security. The appeal must be received within 60 days of the receipt of the denial.

(b) The appeal must be in writing and submitted to the Director, Office of Environment, Health, Safety and Security, EHSS-1/Forrestal Building, U.S. Department of Energy, 1000 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20585. The appeal:

(1) Must contain a concise statement of grounds upon which it is brought, and a description of the relief sought.

(2) Must include a copy of the letter containing the determination being appealed.

(3) Should include a discussion of all relevant authorities that include but are not limited to DOE (and predecessor agencies) rulings, regulations, interpretations, and decisions on appeals, as well as any judicial determinations being relied upon to support the appeal.

[83 FR 66007, Dec. 21, 2018, as amended at 88 FR 41295, June 26, 2023; 88 FR 82238, Nov. 24, 2023]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                                          29,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               183,000
<PP&E>                                      10,869,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                  94,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,052,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          184,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       12,737,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                 (8,629,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,052,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               394,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  153,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               131,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             289,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (179,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (179,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (179,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.06)
        

</TABLE>
```

[109th Congress Public Law 278]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ278.109]

[[Page 120 STAT. 778]]

Public Law 109-278
109th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
1310 Highway 64 NW. in Ramsey, Indiana, as the ``Wilfred Edward `Cousin 
Willie' Sieg, Sr. Post Office''. <<NOTE: Aug. 17, 2006 -  [H.R. 5169]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. WILFRED EDWARD ``COUSIN WILLIE'' SIEG, SR. POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 1310 Highway 64 NW. in Ramsey, Indiana, shall be known and 
designated as the ``Wilfred Edward `Cousin Willie' Sieg, Sr. Post 
Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Wilfred 
Edward `Cousin Willie' Sieg, Sr. Post Office''.

    Approved August 17, 2006.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 5169:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 152 (2006):
            June 12, considered and passed House.
            Aug. 2, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
# Subpart 2426.70 - Minority Business Enterprises

**Parent topic:**PART 2426 - OTHER SOCIOECONOMIC PROGRAMS

## 2426.7001-2426.7002 [Reserved]
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR

THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) 2:06-mj-0069-DRB

)

HECTOR SILVA )

ORDER FOR LIMITED APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL

For good cause upon notice of the death on July 23, 2006, of Atty. Barry Teague, who

appeared as retained counsel for Defendant Hector R. Silva athis preliminary and detention hearing

on July 21, 2006, it is ORDERED that:

1. Assistant Federal Defender, Donnie Wayne Bethel, who was permitted to withdraw in

response to Atty. Teague's appearance notice on July 19, 2006, is hereby RE-APPOINTED for the

LIMITED PURPOSE of ensuring that the Defendant receives prompt notice of the death of his

retained counsel so that he can decide expeditiously whether to retain new counsel or to seek the

reappointment of the Federal Defender.

2. Atty. Bethel is AUTHORIZED to employ the services of certified interpreter Beverly

Childress, if necessary, in order to facilitate his oral or written communications with Defendant.

Counsel is reminded to conserve the court's expenses for interpreter services by ascertaining initially

her scheduled appearances in Montgomery this week for either “jail” interviews or courtroom

appearances for Spanish-speaking defendants like Defendant Silva. 

3. Atty. Bethel shall file by August 3, 2006, notice of compliance with this Order. 

DONE this 24 day of July, 2006. th

/s/ Delores R. Boyd

DELORES R. BOYD

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:06-cr-00200-WHA-CSC Document 27 Filed 07/24/2006 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 35
                                  ----------


                      COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS SERVICING LP


                             OFFICERS' CERTIFICATE
                    ANNUAL STATEMENT OF THE MASTER SERVICER


                                  CWALT, INC.
                       ALTERNATIVE LOAN TRUST 2006-33CB
             MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2006-33CB


      The undersigned does hereby certify that the undersigned is an officer
of Countrywide GP, Inc., general partner of Countrywide Home Loans Servicing
LP (the "Master Servicer"), and does hereby further certify pursuant to
Section 3.16 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the above-captioned
Series (the "Agreement") that:

(i) A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the preceding
calendar year and of the performance of the Master Servicer under the
Agreement has been made under my supervision; and

(ii) To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer
has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material
respects throughout such calendar year.




/s/ Craig Baingo                                      Dated: March 14, 2007
-----------------

Craig Baingo
Executive Vice President, Finance
# Subpart 1529.3 - State and Local Taxes

**Parent topic:**PART 1529 - TAXES

## 1529.303 Application of State and local taxes to Government contractors and subcontractors.

Contractors are responsible for determining the availability of State and local tax exemptions and obtaining such exemptions, if available, unless the Contracting Officer determines under FAR 31.205-41(b)(3) that the administrative burden outweighs the corresponding benefit. Contractors are responsible for ensuring that subcontractors also seek and obtain such exemptions, if available.
###### Editorial Note on Part 2

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

#### § 2.1212 Petitions for Commission review of initial decisions.

Parties may file petitions for review of an initial decision under this subpart in accordance with the procedures set out in § 2.341. Unless otherwise authorized by law, a party to an NRC proceeding must file a petition for Commission review before seeking judicial review of an agency action.
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

Donna Dorsey Davis, ) 

as an individual and derivatively upon behalf ) 

of I-65 Properties, Inc. ) 

 ) 

 Plaintiff, ) 

 ) 

vs. ) CIVIL ACTION NO: 2:06cv766 

 ) 

Richard M. Dorsey, as an individual, ) 

and CD& O, LLC, as a necessary party, ) 

 ) 

 Defendant. ) 

 ) 

and ) 

 ) 

Richard M. Dorsey, ) 

Dorsey Motor Sales, Inc., ) 

and TD & O, Inc., ) 

 ) 

 Counter Plaintiffs, ) 

 ) 

vs. ) 

 ) 

Donna Dorsey Davis, ) 

 ) 

 Counter Defendant. ) 

Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant’s Witness List 

Comes now Plaintiff, by and through undersigned counsel, pursuant to the Court’s 

Scheduling Order and submits the following witnesses who may be used at the trial of 

this case: 

1. Donna D. Davis, 202 Wescott Drive, Clemson, South Carolina 20631, 

(864) 654-9559; 

Case 2:06-cv-00766-MHT-TFM Document 46 Filed 06/13/2007 Page 1 of 3
2

2. Jack Davis, 202 Wescott Drive, Clemson, South Carolina 20631, (864) 

654-9559; 

3. Richard M. Dorsey, 625 East Main Street, Prattville, Alabama 36068, 

telephone number unknown; 

4. Jo Anne Perry, 625 East Main Street, Prattville, Alabama 36068, 

telephone number unknown; 

5. Alan Taunton, 200 Executive Park Drive, Tallassee, Alabama, 36078, 

(334) 283-2567; 

6. George Walthall, Jr., Esquire, 141 West Main Street, Prattville, Alabama 

36067, (334) 365-2255; 

7. Any person identified on any other parties’ witness list; 

8. Any person necessary to impeach the testimony of any witness called in 

this action; 

9. Plaintiff reserves the right to amend this Witness List at any time to add 

witnesses who may be brought to light or add the name(s) of any 

witness(es) whose name(s) may have been accidentally omitted from this 

list. 

 

Respectfully Submitted this 13th day of June, 2007. 

//s// Lindsay B. Erwin 

 Lindsay B. Erwin 

 ASB-5299-Y59E 

 Attorney for Plaintiff 

Meacham, Earley & Fowler, P.C. 

5704 Veterans Parkway 

Case 2:06-cv-00766-MHT-TFM Document 46 Filed 06/13/2007 Page 2 of 3
3

Columbus, Georgia 31904 

(706) 576-4064 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

 I hereby certify that on the _13_ day of June, 2007, I electronically filed the 

foregoing with the Clerk of the Court using electronic filing system which will send 

information of such filing to the following: 

 Clifford W. Cleveland 

 Cleveland & Colley, P.C. 

 P.O. Box 680689 

 Prattville, AL 36068 

 James E. Roberts, Esquire 

 4908 Cahaba River Road, Suite 204 

 Birmingham, AL 35243 

 //s// Lindsay B. Erwin 

 OF COUNSEL 

 

Case 2:06-cv-00766-MHT-TFM Document 46 Filed 06/13/2007 Page 3 of 3
IV 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 247

Commending the Southern California Association of Governments for Forty 

Years of Planning and Advocacy in Transportation, Air Quality, and 

Growth Management. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 27, 2005

Ms. MILLENDER-MCDONALD (for herself and Mr. GARY G. MILLER of California) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Government Reform 

RESOLUTION

Commending the Southern California Association of Governments for Forty Years of Planning and Advocacy in 

Transportation, Air Quality, and Growth Management.

Whereas the Southern California Association of Governments, 

hereafter in this resolution referred to as ‘‘SCAG’’, is the 

Nation’s largest Metropolitan Planning Organization representing the 6 counties (Imperial, Los Angeles, Orange, 

Riverside, San Bernardino, and Ventura) and 187 cities 

that make up the Southern California region; 

Whereas SCAG was initially formed on October 28, 1965, 

when local elected officials from 56 cities and 5 counties 

first convened to begin planning for Southern California’s 

future on a regional basis; 
2

•HRES 247 IH 

Whereas SCAG is currently governed by a 76-member Regional Council that includes city and county elected officials representing the diverse perspectives of the Southern California region; 

Whereas SCAG has long been dedicated to developing regional solutions to the many transportation, air quality, 

housing, land use, and other issues facing Southern California; 

Whereas SCAG has developed, and continues to develop, regional transportation plans intended to identify Southern 

California’s long-term transportation needs while protecting the region’s air quality; 

Whereas SCAG has developed a series of strategies through 

the Southern California Compass growth visioning initiative intended to provide for more effective local land use 

and transportation decision-making; 

Whereas SCAG serves as the regional agency responsible for 

implementing the state Regional Housing Needs Assessment program on behalf of Southern California in an effort to establish goals for future housing needs; 

Whereas SCAG played a critical role in conceptualizing what 

ultimately became the Alameda Corridor freight rail 

project, one of the Nation’s largest public works projects; 

Whereas SCAG was involved in the initial planning efforts for 

what ultimately became the Metrolink commuter rail system; and 

Whereas SCAG has remained dedicated to its mission statement of ‘‘Leadership, Vision and Progress, which promote economic growth, personal well-being and livable 

communities for all Southern Californians’’; Now, therefore, be it
3

•HRES 247 IH 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives com2 mends the 40 years of service of SCAG to the Southern 

3 California region and acknowledges that SCAG will con4 tinue to play a critical role in shaping Southern Califor5 nia’s future.

Æ
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER REGARDING
PERIODIC REPORT FILED PURSUANT TO SECTION 13(A) OR 15 (D)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

I, Gregory A. Wells, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

To the best of my knowledge and belief, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on August 14, 2002 by NTS-Properties VI, a Maryland Limited Partnership and to which this certification
is appended (the "Periodic Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of NTS-Properties
VI, a Maryland Limited Partnership.

|                                         
|-----------------------------------------
|                                         
|/s/ Gregory A. Wells                     
|                                         
|Gregory A. Wells                         
|Senior Vice President and Chief Financial
|Officer of NTS Capital Corporation       
|                                         
|
§ 1021.313 Public review of environmental impact statements. ( a ) The public review and comment period on a DOE draft EIS shall be no less than 45 days (40 CFR 1506.10(c)). The public comment period begins when EPA publishes a Notice of Availability of the document in the Federal Register.
( b ) DOE shall hold at least one public hearing on DOE draft EISs. Such public hearings shall be announced at least 15 days in advance. The announcement shall identify the subject of the draft EIS and include the location, date, and time of the public hearings.
( c ) DOE shall prepare a final EIS following the public comment period and hearings on the draft EIS. The final EIS shall respond to oral and written comments received during public review of the draft EIS, as provided at 40 CFR 1503.4. In addition to the requirements at 40 CFR 1502.9(b), a DOE final EIS may include any Statement of Findings required by 10 CFR part 1022, “Compliance with Floodplain and Wetland Environmental Review Requirements,” or a Statement of Findings may be issued separately.
( d ) DOE shall use appropriate means to publicize the availability of draft and final EISs and the time and place for public hearings on a draft EIS. The methods chosen should focus on reaching persons who may be interested in or affected by the proposal and may include the methods listed in 40 CFR 1506.6(b)(3).
[57 FR 15144, Apr. 24, 1992, as amended at 68 FR 51432, Aug. 27, 2003]
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-7324

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

JAMAILLE DEVON MIDGETTE,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Greenville. James C. Dever, III, 

Chief District Judge. (4:12-cr-00029-D-1)

Submitted: January 31, 2017 Decided: February 3, 2017

Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jamaille Devon Midgette, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Howard, 

Augustus D. Willis, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, 

Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Jamaille Devon Midgette appeals the district court’s order 

denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion. We have 

reviewed the record and conclude that the district court did not 

abuse its discretion in denying Midgette’s motion. See United 

States v. Smalls, 720 F.3d 193, 195 (4th Cir. 2013). 

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. United 

States v. Midgette, No. 4:12-cr-00029-D-1 (E.D.N.C. Aug. 30, 

2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED
Subpart 333.1 - Protests    **Parent topic:** PART 333 - PROTESTS, DISPUTES, AND APPEALS333.102 General.       (g)          (1)  			The Office of General Counsel-General Law Division serves as the liaison for protests lodged with the Government Accountability Office (GAO); is designated as the office responsible for all protests within the Department of Health and Human Services; and serves as the notification point with GAO for all protests.          (2) The contracting officer will follow the direction of the Operating Division's protest control officer for responding to protests whether they are filed with GAO or directly with the contracting officer.333.103 Protests to the agency.       (f)          (1)  			Protests to the contracting officer must be in writing. The contracting officer is authorized to make the determination, using the criteria in Federal Acquisition Regulation 33.104(b), to award a contract notwithstanding the protest after obtaining the concurrence of the contracting activity's protest control officer and consulting with the appropriate legal office.