alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1090 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 1090

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                      December 6, 2006.
Whereas Ruth Brown passed away on November 17, 2006;
Whereas Ruth Brown, a rhythm and blues singer and songwriter known as Miss 
        Rhythm, was one of Atlantic Records's first recording and performing 
        stars;
Whereas Ruth Brown's elegant voice made her a hit from the 1940s onward with 
        such songs as ``So Long'' and ``Teardrops from My Eyes'';
Whereas Ruth Brown's career spanned the post-World War II era through the Civil 
        Rights Movement to the 21st century, a period which also saw the genre 
        of ``race'' music move into the American mainstream;
Whereas Ruth Brown helped found the Rhythm and Blues Foundation in 1988 to 
        recognize, promote, and preserve rhythm and blues music;
Whereas Ruth Brown worked with Congress to advance the cause of copyright 
        royalty reform so that rhythm and blues artists could receive deserved 
        copyright royalties from their music;
Whereas Ruth Brown's talent was recognized with a Tony Award for Best Actress in 
        a Musical in ``Black and Blue'' in 1989, a Grammy Award for her album 
        ``Blues on Broadway'' in 1989, induction into the Rock and Roll Hall of 
        Fame in 1993, and a Lifetime Achievement Award from the Blues Foundation 
        in 1999;
Whereas Ruth Brown's autobiography, ``Miss Rhythm,'' received the Ralph J. 
        Gleason Music Book Award; and
Whereas Ruth Brown is survived by 2 sons, 4 siblings, 3 grandchildren, and a 
        multitude of cousins, nieces, nephews, friends, and admirers: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) honors the life of Ruth Brown;
            (2) recognizes Ruth Brown for her efforts toward reforming the 
        copyright royalty system on behalf of rhythm and blues recording 
        artists;
            (3) commends Ruth Brown for her success in ensuring that rhythm and 
        blues recording artists would receive deserved copyright royalties; and
            (4) expresses its deepest condolences to Ruth Brown's family and 
        friends.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION

J.B., a minor child, by and )

through his next friend, )

Addie Ward, on behalf of )

himself and all others )

similarly situated, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

v. ) 2:06cv755-MHT

)

WALTER WOOD, in his )

individual capacity, )

)

Defendant. )

J.B., a minor child, by and )

through his next friend, )

Addie Ward, on behalf of )

himself and all others )

similarly situated, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

v. ) 2:06cv908-MHT

)

WALTER WOOD, in his )

individual capacity, )

)

Defendant. )

RENEWED MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

The Defendant J. Walter Wood, Jr., individually,

moves for an entry of summary judgment against the

Case 2:06-cv-00755-MHT-CSC Document 70 Filed 11/16/2007 Page 1 of 3
Plaintiffs for all claims in the above referenced

cases. 

On November 6, 2007 (Doc. 69), the Court denied the

Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment, without

prejudice. The Defendant hereby resubmits, and amends,

the original motion for summary judgment.

In support of this motion the Defendant submits (or

resubmits) the following:

Brief In Support of Motion for Summary

Judgment(Doc. 30).

Exhibits attached to original motion. 

Brief in Support of Renewed Motion for Summary 

Judgment and Motion to Supplement the Record.

The affidavit of Danielle Lipow attached to Motion

to Supplement the Record.

Respectfully submitted

s/ T. Dudley Perry, Jr. 

T. Dudley Perry, Jr.

Bar Number: 3985-R67T

General Counsel

Post Office Box 66

Mt. Meigs, AL 36057

Telephone: (334) 215-3803

Fax: (334) 215-3872

E-Mail:

dudley.perry@dys.alabama.gov

Case 2:06-cv-00755-MHT-CSC Document 70 Filed 11/16/2007 Page 2 of 3
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hearby certify that on the 16 of November, 2007,

th

I electronically filed the foregoing RENEWED MOTION FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT, with the Clerk of the Court Using the

CM/ECF system which will send notification of such

filing to the following:

Michael J. Crow, Esq.

BEASLEY, ALLEN, CROW

METHVIN, PORTIS & MILES, P.C.

Post Office Box 4160

Montgomery, AL 36103-4160

Robert D. Drummond, Jr., Esq.

ATTORNEY AT LAW 

323 De LaMare

Fairhope, AL 36532

s/T. Dudley Perry, Jr. 

T. Dudley Perry, Jr.

Bar Number: 3985-R67T

General Counsel

Attorney For Defendant

J. Walter Wood, Jr.

Case 2:06-cv-00755-MHT-CSC Document 70 Filed 11/16/2007 Page 3 of 3
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

PATRICIA BURKETT, Administratrix of the )

Estate of JEREMY BURKETT, deceased )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v ) 1: 06-CV-00775-DRB

)

TIMOTHY EUGENE McCRAY and )

S.E. LUMBER COMPANY )

)

Defendants.

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE 

COMES NOW, the undersigned and gives notice to this Honorable Court of

her Appearance for the Defendant, Southern General Insurance Company in this

cause. The undersigned, Cindy L. Self is with the law firm of LAMAR, MILLER,

NORRIS, HAGGARD & CHRISTIE, P.C.

s/Cindy L. Self 

Cindy L. Self (SEL035)

Attorney for Defendant

OF COUNSEL:

LAMAR, MILLER, NORRIS, HAGGARD & CHRISTIE, P.C.

501 Riverchase Parkway East

Suite 100

Birmingham, Alabama 35244

(205) 326-0000

Case 1:06-cv-00775-TFM Document 36 Filed 12/07/2006 Page 1 of 3
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on December 7, 2006 I electronically filed the foregoing

with the Clerk of Court using CM/ECF which will send notification of such filing to

the following: 

David Jerome Harrison 

PO Box 994 

Geneva, AL 36340 

davidjharrison@centurytel.net

Christoffer Peter Bolvig, III 

Hall Conerly & Bolvig PC 

1400 Financial Center

505 North 20th Street 

Birmingham, AL 35203-2626

peter.bolvig@hallconerly.com

Bill Mudd, Esq. 

505 20 Street North th

Birmingham, AL 35203

billmudd@mhsolaw.com

Randolph H. Phillips, Esq. 

609 Pine Avenue

P.O. Box 2303

Albany, GA 31702

rhplaw@bellsouth.net

David Woodham Rousseau, Esq. 

211 W Adams Street

Dothan, AL 36303-4401

rousseaulaw@graceba.net

Case 1:06-cv-00775-TFM Document 36 Filed 12/07/2006 Page 2 of 3
Tommy Ray Scarbrough, Esq. 

119 S Foster Street

Suite 101

Dothan, AL 36301

trsllc@graceba.net

s/ Cindy L. Self

Of counsel

Case 1:06-cv-00775-TFM Document 36 Filed 12/07/2006 Page 3 of 3
Editorial Note on Part 35
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 35 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

§ 35.657 Therapy-related computer systems. The licensee shall perform acceptance testing on the treatment planning system of therapy-related computer systems in accordance with published protocols accepted by nationally recognized bodies. At a minimum, the acceptance testing must include, as applicable, verification of: ( a ) The source-specific input parameters required by the dose calculation algorithm;
( b ) The accuracy of dose, dwell time, and treatment time calculations at representative points;
( c ) The accuracy of isodose plots and graphic displays;
( d ) The accuracy of the software used to determine sealed source positions from radiographic images; and
( e ) The accuracy of electronic transfer of the treatment delivery parameters to the treatment delivery unit from the treatment planning system.
§ 20.1906 Procedures for receiving and opening packages. ( a ) Each licensee who expects to receive a package containing quantities of radioactive material in excess of a Type A quantity, as defined in § 71.4 and appendix A to part 71 of this chapter, shall make arrangements to receive— ( 1 ) The package when the carrier offers it for delivery; or
( 2 ) Notification of the arrival of the package at the carrier's terminal and to take possession of the package expeditiously.
( b ) Each licensee shall— ( 1 ) Monitor the external surfaces of a labeled[3a] package for radioactive contamination unless the package contains only radioactive material in the form of a gas or in special form as defined in 10 CFR 71.4;
( 2 ) Monitor the external surfaces of a labeled3a package for radiation levels unless the package contains quantities of radioactive material that are less than or equal to the Type A quantity, as defined in § 71.4 and appendix A to part 71 of this chapter; and
( 3 ) Monitor all packages known to contain radioactive material for radioactive contamination and radiation levels if there is evidence of degradation of package integrity, such as packages that are crushed, wet, or damaged.
( c ) The licensee shall perform the monitoring required by paragraph (b) of this section as soon as practical after receipt of the package, but not later than 3 hours after the package is received at the licensee's facility if it is received during the licensee's normal working hours, or not later than 3 hours from the beginning of the next working day if it is received after working hours.
( d ) The licensee shall immediately notify the final delivery carrier and the NRC Headquarters Operations Center by telephone at the numbers specified in appendix A to part 73 of this chapter, when— ( 1 ) Removable radioactive surface contamination exceeds the limits of § 71.87(i) of this chapter; or
( 2 ) External radiation levels exceed the limits of § 71.47 of this chapter.
( e ) Each licensee shall— ( 1 ) Establish, maintain, and retain written procedures for safely opening packages in which radioactive material is received; and
( 2 ) Ensure that the procedures are followed and that due consideration is given to special instructions for the type of package being opened.
( f ) Licensees transferring special form sources in licensee-owned or licensee-operated vehicles to and from a work site are exempt from the contamination monitoring requirements of paragraph (b) of this section, but are not exempt from the survey requirement in paragraph (b) of this section for measuring radiation levels that is required to ensure that the source is still properly lodged in its shield.
[56 FR 23401, May 21, 1991, as amended at 57 FR 39357, Aug. 31, 1992; 60 FR 20185, Apr. 25, 1995; 63 FR 39482, July 23, 1998; 85 FR 65661, Oct. 16, 2020; 85 FR 68243, Oct. 28, 2020] Footnotes -
20.1906
[3a] Labeled with a Radioactive White I, Yellow II, or Yellow III label as specified in U.S. Department of Transportation regulations, 49 CFR 172.403 and 172.436-440.
#### § 948.123 Approval.

The committee or its duly authorized agents shall give prompt consideration to each application for a Certificate of Privilege. Approval of an application based upon a determination as to whether the information contained therein and other information available to the committee supports approval, shall be evidenced by the issuance of a Certificate of Privilege to the applicant. Each certificate shall cover a specified period, and specified qualities and quantities of potatoes to be sold or transported to the designated consignee for the purposes declared.
§ 429.118 Injunctions. If DOE has reason to seek an injunction under the Act: ( a ) DOE will notify the manufacturer, private labeler or any other person as required, of the prohibited act at issue and DOE's intent to seek a judicial order enjoining the prohibited act unless the manufacturer, private labeler or other person, delivers to DOE within 15 calendar days a corrective action and compliance plan, satisfactory to DOE, of the steps it will take to ensure that the prohibited act ceases. DOE will monitor the implementation of such plan.
( b ) If the manufacturer, private labeler or any other person as required, fails to cease engaging in the prohibited act or fails to provide a satisfactory corrective action and compliance plan, DOE may seek an injunction.
Editorial Note on Part 35
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 35 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

§ 35.2643 Records of periodic spot-checks for remote afterloader units. ( a ) A licensee shall retain a record of each spot-check for remote afterloader units required by § 35.643 for 3 years.
( b ) The record must include, as applicable— ( 1 ) The date of the spot-check;
( 2 ) The manufacturer's name, model number, and serial number for the remote afterloader unit and source;
( 3 ) An assessment of timer accuracy;
( 4 ) Notations indicating the operability of each entrance door electrical interlock, radiation monitors, source exposure indicator lights, viewing and intercom systems, and clock and decayed source activity in the unit's computer; and
( 5 ) The name of the individual who performed the periodic spot-check and the signature of the authorized medical physicist who reviewed the record of the spot-check.
( c ) A licensee shall retain a copy of the procedures required by § 35.643(b) until the licensee no longer possesses the remote afterloader unit.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE MARCH
31, 1999 FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           2,686
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 1,875
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     35,587
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           7,774
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             7,933
<LOANS>                                         86,734
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,110
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 137,102
<DEPOSITS>                                     113,779
<SHORT-TERM>                                     4,500
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              1,080
<LONG-TERM>                                        996
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,500
<OTHER-SE>                                      15,247
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 137,102
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  1,887
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  630
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     7
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 2,524
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                 904
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 973
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            1,551
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       43
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  1,107
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    527
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         527
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       166
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .55
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .55
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.99
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,218
<LOANS-PAST>                                        14
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,109
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       52
<RECOVERIES>                                         9
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,110
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,110
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            100
        

</TABLE>
Subpart 2109.4 - Debarment, Suspension, and Ineligibility    **Parent topic:** PART 2109 - CONTRACTOR QUALIFICATIONS2109.408 Certification regarding debarment, suspension, proposed debarment and other responsibility matters.       FAR subpart 9.4 is implemented by changing the FAR offeror's certification at FAR 52.209-5 (which is part of a solicitation) to a pre-contract certificate and a contract clause. These provisions reflect the FEGLI Program's statutory exemption from competitive bidding (5 U.S.C. 8709), which obviates the issuance of solicitations.2109.409 Certification and contract clause.       (a) The contracting officer may require the precontract certificate in 2152.209-70 to be filed prior to or during negotiations.          (b) The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 2152.209-71 in all FEGLI Program contracts.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

November 9, 2005

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 04-51309

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ROBERTO LORETO-VALERIO,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 3:04-CR-1324-ALL

--------------------

Before REAVLEY, GARZA, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Roberto LoretoValerio raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres

v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that a

prior conviction is a sentencing factor under 8 U.S.C. 

§ 1326(b)(2) and not a separate criminal offense. The

Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the

judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

CALVIN FLUKER, RICARDO )

WRIGHT, BERYL JACKSON, )

TRACY MARTIN, LISA )

PITCHFORD, KIMBERLY LOVE, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.:

Plaintiffs, )

) 2:06cv785-MHT

v. )

)

U.S. FOODSERVICE, INC. and )

U.S. FOODSERVICE, INC. - )

MONTGOMERY DIVISION, )

)

Defendants. ) UNOPPOSED

MOTION TO EXTEND

DEFENDANT’S RESPONSE TO DISCOVERY

Defendant U.S. Foodservice, Inc. moves the court for an extension to serve

its responses to plaintiffs’ Interrogatories and Requests for Production of

Documents. As grounds for this motion, defendant states as follows:

1. Plaintiffs’ counsel has been contacted and does not oppose this

extension.

2. Plaintiffs filed a Motion to Compel responses to discovery on June 19,

2007. Defendant filed its opposition to the Motion on June 22, 2007, and on the

same date the Court issued an Order granting plaintiff’s Motion and ordering

defendant to respond to the discovery requests by July 10, 2007.

Case 2:06-cv-00785-MHT-WC Document 43 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 1 of 3
2

3. When the Order was received, defendant’s counsel was out of town on

business. In addition, several employees of defendant were on vacation the week

of July 4th, which delayed gathering documents and information responsive to

plaintiffs’ requests.

4. Defendant therefore requests until noon on Monday, July 16, 2007 to

respond to discovery.

Respectfully submitted,

s/ Tammy L. Baker

Tammy L. Baker (ASB-9522-B62T)

E-Mail: BakerT@jacksonlewis.com

JACKSON LEWIS LLP

2001Park Place North

Suite 650

Birmingham, Alabama 35203

Phone: (205) 332-3106

Fax: (205) 332-3131

COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT

Case 2:06-cv-00785-MHT-WC Document 43 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 2 of 3
3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

This is to certify that on July 10, 2007, the undersigned electronically filed

the foregoing with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system that will send

notification of such filing to the following:

Jon C. Goldfarb, Esq.

Maury S. Weiner, Esq.

Ethan R. Dettling, Esq.

Melissa N. Tapp, Esq.

Wiggins, Childs, Quinn & Pantazis, LLC

301 19

th

Street North

Birmingham, AL 35203

/s/ Tammy L. Baker

Counsel of Record

Case 2:06-cv-00785-MHT-WC Document 43 Filed 07/10/2007 Page 3 of 3
#### § 915.4 Production area.

*Production area* means the counties of Brevard, Orange, Lake, Polk, Hillsborough, and Pinellas in the State of Florida, and all of the counties of that State situated south of such counties.

[20 FR 4177, June 15, 1955. Redesignated at 26 FR 12751, Dec. 30, 1961]
Order filed July 16 , 2012.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________
NO. 14

- 12

- 00 455

- CV

____________
IN THE INTEREST OF J.W.K. AKA J.K., K.D.R. AKA K.K., K.D.R., JR. AND Q.S.B. , child ren

On Appeal from the 313 th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2011

- 03425J



### ORDER

This is an accelerated appeal from a judgment in a suit in which the termination of
the parent

- child relationship is at issue (“parental termination case ”). A ppellant ’ s brief

was due July 16 , 2012. No brief has been filed. On July 16, 2012, appellant requested a

second extension of time to file the brief until July 26, 2012. When appellant’s first
request was granted, the court notified appellant that no further extensions would be
granted.U nless appellant files a brief with the clerk of this court within 10 days of the date

of this order, the court will dismiss the a ppeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App.
P. 42.3(b).

PER CURIAM
Subpart 2128.3 - Insurance

Parent topic: PART 2128 - BONDS AND INSURANCE

2128.370 Contract clause.

The contract clause at FAR 52.228-7 is a mandatory clause in FEGLI Program contracts, except

paragraph (d) is modified as follows:

(d) The Government's liability under paragraph (c) of this clause is limited to the amount available in

the Employee's Life Insurance Fund. Nothing in this contract shall be construed as implying that the

Government will make additional funds available later or that Congress will appropriate funds later

sufficient to meet deficiencies.
§ 217.55 Mandatory acceptance of an allocation order. ( a ) Except as otherwise specified in this section, a person shall accept and comply with every allocation order received.
( b ) A person shall not discriminate against an allocation order in any manner such as by charging higher prices for materials, services, or facilities covered by the order or by imposing terms and conditions for contracts and orders involving allocated materials, services, or facilities that differ from the person's terms and conditions for contracts and orders for the materials, services, or facilities prior to receiving the allocation order.
( c ) If a person is unable to comply fully with the required action(s) specified in an allocation order, the person must notify the Department of Energy immediately, explain the extent to which compliance is possible, and give the reasons why full compliance is not possible. If notification is given verbally, written or electronic confirmation must be provided within five (5) working days. Such notification does not release the person from complying with the order to the fullest extent possible, until the person is notified by the Department of Energy that the order has been changed or cancelled.