alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>



                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
              Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to
                    ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


In connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the
Quarterly Report of SEDONA Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the
period ending June 30, 2003 (the "Report"), I, Anita M. Primo, Interim Chief
Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
             15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (3) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
             material respects, the financial condition and results of
             operations of the Company.

/s/ Anita M. Primo
----------------------------------------------
Anita M. Primo
Controller and Interim Chief Financial Officer


August 19, 2003
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

 v. )

)

NESTOR AMAIQUEMA-MACIAS ) CR. NO. 2:06CR196-MHT

O R D E R

The defendant by consent has appeared before a United States Magistrate Judge and has entered

a plea of guilty. The Magistrate Judge has accepted the plea of guilty and has adjudicated the defendant

guilty. Accordingly, it is ORDERED as follows:

1. That sentencing of the defendant be, and the same is, hereby set on January 18, 2007, at 10:00

a.m. in the Frank M.Johnson,Jr. United States Courthouse Complex, One Church Street, Montgomery,

Alabama.

2. That in accordance with Rule 32(f)(1), Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, on or before

January 8, 2007, counsel for the defendant and the Government shall communicate in writing to the

probation officer, and to each other, any objections they have as to any material information, sentencing

classifications, sentencing guideline ranges, and policy statements contained in or omitted from the

presentence report.

3. That, unless excused in writing by the Chief U.S. Probation Officer of this district, counsel

for the parties shall be available for a conference with the probation officer on January 9, 2007, at 2:00

p.m., to discuss and resolve, if possible, factual and legal issues contained in the presentence report. If

the probation officer determines or if any of the parties request that a personal meeting be held to resolve

the issues, such meeting shall be at the U.S. Probation Office, One Church Street, Montgomery, AL,

on the above date and time. Such request for a personal conference shall be made to the probation officer

within five (5) calendar days after receipt of the presentence report. Otherwise, the conference shall be

held telephonically. Any motion for downward departure shall be filed on or before the conference date

with the probation officer, unless based on unknown and unforseen circumstances arising after that date,

in which case the motion must be filed promptly upon discovery of such circumstances.

Nothing contained in this Order shall be construed as impairing the rights of any party as

established in the Constitution or laws of the United States.

DONE this 26th day of October , 2006.

 /s/ Myron H. Thompson 

United States District Judge

Case 2:06-cr-00196-MHT-CSC Document 19 Filed 10/26/2006 Page 1 of 1
Case 2:06-cv-00756-MHT-WC Document 32 Filed 05/09/2007 Page 1 of 5
Case 2:06-cv-00756-MHT-WC Document 32 Filed 05/09/2007 Page 2 of 5
Case 2:06-cv-00756-MHT-WC Document 32 Filed 05/09/2007 Page 3 of 5
Case 2:06-cv-00756-MHT-WC Document 32 Filed 05/09/2007 Page 4 of 5
Case 2:06-cv-00756-MHT-WC Document 32 Filed 05/09/2007 Page 5 of 5
Case 2:06-cv-00756-MHT-WC Document 32-2 Filed 05/09/2007 Page 1 of 22
Case 2:06-cv-00756-MHT-WC Document 32-2 Filed 05/09/2007 Page 2 of 22
Case 2:06-cv-00756-MHT-WC Document 32-2 Filed 05/09/2007 Page 3 of 22
Case 2:06-cv-00756-MHT-WC Document 32-2 Filed 05/09/2007 Page 4 of 22
Case 2:06-cv-00756-MHT-WC Document 32-2 Filed 05/09/2007 Page 5 of 22
Case 2:06-cv-00756-MHT-WC Document 32-2 Filed 05/09/2007 Page 6 of 22
Case 2:06-cv-00756-MHT-WC Document 32-2 Filed 05/09/2007 Page 7 of 22
Case 2:06-cv-00756-MHT-WC Document 32-2 Filed 05/09/2007 Page 8 of 22
Case 2:06-cv-00756-MHT-WC Document 32-2 Filed 05/09/2007 Page 9 of 22
Case 2:06-cv-00756-MHT-WC Document 32-2 Filed 05/09/2007 Page 10 of 22
Case 2:06-cv-00756-MHT-WC Document 32-2 Filed 05/09/2007 Page 11 of 22
Case 2:06-cv-00756-MHT-WC Document 32-2 Filed 05/09/2007 Page 12 of 22
Case 2:06-cv-00756-MHT-WC Document 32-2 Filed 05/09/2007 Page 13 of 22
Case 2:06-cv-00756-MHT-WC Document 32-2 Filed 05/09/2007 Page 14 of 22
Case 2:06-cv-00756-MHT-WC Document 32-2 Filed 05/09/2007 Page 15 of 22
Case 2:06-cv-00756-MHT-WC Document 32-2 Filed 05/09/2007 Page 16 of 22
Case 2:06-cv-00756-MHT-WC Document 32-2 Filed 05/09/2007 Page 17 of 22
Case 2:06-cv-00756-MHT-WC Document 32-2 Filed 05/09/2007 Page 18 of 22
Case 2:06-cv-00756-MHT-WC Document 32-2 Filed 05/09/2007 Page 19 of 22
Case 2:06-cv-00756-MHT-WC Document 32-2 Filed 05/09/2007 Page 20 of 22
Case 2:06-cv-00756-MHT-WC Document 32-2 Filed 05/09/2007 Page 21 of 22
Case 2:06-cv-00756-MHT-WC Document 32-2 Filed 05/09/2007 Page 22 of 22
#### § 19.3 Definitions.

As used in this part:

*Act* means the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, (68 Stat. 919) including any amendments thereto.

*Commission* means the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

*Exclusion* means the removal of counsel representing multiple interests from an interview whenever the NRC official conducting the interview has concrete evidence that the presence of the counsel would obstruct and impede the particular investigation or inspection.

*License* means a license issued under the regulations in parts 30 through 36, 39, 40, 60, 61, 63, 70, or 72 of this chapter, including licenses to manufacture, construct and/or operate a production or utilization facility under parts 50, 52, or 54 of this chapter.

*Licensee* means the holder of such a license.

*Regulated activities* means any activity carried on which is under the jurisdiction of the NRC under the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, or any title of the Energy Reorganization Act of 1972, as amended.

*Regulated entities* means any individual, person, organization, or corporation that is subject to the regulatory jurisdiction of the NRC, including (but not limited to) an applicant for or holder of a standard design approval under subpart E of part 52 of this chapter or a standard design certification under subpart B of part 52 of this chapter.

*Restricted area* means an area, access to which is limited by the licensee for the purpose of protecting individuals against undue risks from exposure to radiation and radioactive materials. Restricted area does not include areas used as residential quarters, but separate rooms in a residential building may be set apart as a restricted area.

*Sequestration* means the separation or isolation of witnesses and their attorneys from other witnesses and their attorneys during an interview conducted as part of an investigation, inspection, or other inquiry.

*Worker* means an individual engaged in activities licensed or regulated by the Commission and controlled by a licensee or regulated entity, but does not include the licensee or regulated entity.

[38 FR 22217, Aug. 17, 1973, as amended at 40 FR 8783, Mar. 3, 1975; 53 FR 31680, Aug. 19, 1988; 55 FR 247, Jan. 4, 1990; 56 FR 23470, May 21, 1991; 56 FR 65948, Dec. 19, 1991; 57 FR 61785, Dec. 29, 1992; 58 FR 7736, Feb. 9, 1993; 66 FR 55789, Nov. 2, 2001; 69 FR 76600, Dec. 22, 2004; 72 FR 49484, Aug. 28, 2007]
#### In the Matter of Anonymous, an Alleged Incapacitated Person.

Submitted October 29, 2007;

decided December 18, 2007

Reported below, 41 AD3d 346.

Motion for leave to appeal denied with $100 costs and necessary reproduction disbursements. Motion to seal dismissed as unnecessary *(see*Rules of Ct of Appeals [22 NYCRR] § 500.5 [b]).
```

[House Report 106-1008]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

106th Congress                                                   Report
                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
 2d Session                                                    106-1008

======================================================================

 
WAIVING POINTS OF ORDER AGAINST THE CONFERENCE REPORT TO ACCOMPANY H.R. 
          4942, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA APPROPRIATIONS ACT, 2001

                                _______
                                

October 26 (legislative day, October 25), 2000.--Referred to the House 
                   Calendar and ordered to be printed

                                _______
                                

    Mr. Linder, from the Committee on Rules, submitted the following

                              R E P O R T

                       [To accompany H. Res. 653]

    The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration 
House Resolution 653, by a non-record vote, report the same to 
the House with the recommendation that the resolution be 
adopted.

                SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

    The resolution waives all points of order against the 
conference report to accompany H.R. 4942, the District of 
Columbia Appropriations Act, 2001, and against its 
consideration. The rule further provides that the conference 
report shall be considered as read.

                                  

```
#### SMITH et al. v. NEW YORK CENT. & H. R. R. CO.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

November 13, 1914.)

Appeal from Trial Term, Dutchess County.

Action by Carrie G. Smith and another against the New York Central & Hudson River Railroad Company. From a judgment for plaintiffs, and an order denying a new trial, defendant appeals. Affirmed.

Argued before JENKS, P. J., and CARR, STAPLETON, PUTNAM, and THOMAS, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. See J. Henry Smith et al. v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad Co., 150 N. Y. Supp. 233, decided herewith.

THOMAS, J., dissents, upon grounds stated in decision of J. Henry Smith et al. v. New York Cent. & H. R. R. Co., supra.
Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Patriot Coal Corporation;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
    /s/ Mark N. SchroederMark N. SchroederChief Financial Officer
2433.106 Solicitation provision.

The Contracting Officer shall insert the provision at 2452.233-70, Review of Contracting Officer

Protest Decisions, in all solicitations for contracts expected to exceed the simplified acquisition

threshold.

Parent topic: Subpart 2433.1 - Protests
(June 17, 1970)

#### In the Matter of Alex J. Nirenberg, Respondent, v. Francis J. Vogt et al., Respondents, and Harry S. Hoffman, Jr., as Chairman of the Conservative Party of Ulster County, Appellant.

Memorandum by the Court. Judgment invalidating petition and authorization designating Francis J. Vogt as candidate for nomination by the Conservative Party for the office of District Attorney of Ulster County reversed, on the law and the facts, and petition dismissed, without costs. The validity of the proxies not having been questioned, we find that the designation was duly authorized at a meeting of the County Committee of the Conservative Party. Where the rules of the committee, as here, permit members to vote by proxy, they may do so, and designations made on votes so cast are valid. Herlihy, P. J., Aulisi, Staley, Jr., Cooke and Sweeney, JJ., concur in memorandum by the court.
27.9003 Contractor eligibility.

Contractors must have DLA controlling authority approval to be eligible for award, unless one of the

exceptions at PGI 25.7902-4(S-92) applies.

Parent topic: SUBPART 27.90 – EXPORT CONTROL OF TECHNICAL DATA
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 243 (Monday, December 20, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 79446]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-31830]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS


Clinical Science Research and Development Service; Cooperative 
Studies Scientific Evaluation Committee; Notice of Meeting

    The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) gives notice under Public 
Law 92-463 (Federal Advisory Committee Act) that a meeting of the 
Clinical Science Research and Development Service Cooperative Studies 
Scientific Evaluation Committee will be held on January 13, 2011, at 
The Ritz-Carlton Hotel, 1150 22nd Street, NW., Washington, DC. The 
meeting is scheduled to begin at 8 a.m. and end at 2:30 p.m.
    The Committee advises the Chief Research and Development Officer 
through the Director of the Clinical Science Research and Development 
Service on the relevance and feasibility of proposed projects and the 
scientific validity and propriety of technical details, including 
protection of human subjects.
    The session will be open to the public for approximately 30 minutes 
at the start of the meeting for the discussion of administrative 
matters and the general status of the program. The remaining portion of 
the meeting will be closed to the public for the Committee's review, 
discussion and evaluation of research and development applications.
    During the closed portion of the meeting, discussions and 
recommendations will deal with qualifications of personnel conducting 
the studies, staff and consultant critiques of research proposals and 
similar documents and the medical records of patients who are study 
subjects, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly 
unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. As provided by section 10(d) 
of Public Law 92-463, as amended, closing portions of this meeting is 
in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(6) and (c)(9)(B).
    Those who plan to attend should contact Dr. Grant Huang, Deputy 
Director, Cooperative Studies Program (125), Department of Veterans 
Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20420, or e-mail at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#88effae9e6fca6e0fde9e6efc8fee9a6efe7fe"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c2a5b0a3acb6ecaab7a3aca582b4a3eca5adb4">[email protected]</span></a> or phone at (202) 461-1700.

    Dated: December 14, 2010.

    By Direction of the Secretary.
Vivian Drake,
Acting Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010-31830 Filed 12-17-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Case 3:06-cr-00210-MEF-CSC Document 6 Filed 09/14/2006 Page 1 of 1
Sus Im

Lo Que 

Pagand

Va El D
2

algunos com

rece como “

“Federal Ins

español: Ley 

Federal), la 

impuestos d

A usted le 

impuestos d

dinero. En e

¿Quién p

de Segur

Usted, por su

otros 150 m

casi el 96 po

los Estados 

Seguro Soci

por ciento d

para Seguro 

Medicare). E

impuesto co

salario, hast

$76,200, su 

Medicare de

1.45 por cie

¿Sabía us

cantidad de 

a la que uste

su deducció

quela por do

su patrono e

para sus ben
3

¿Qpg

de Segur

Hoy usted tr

Seguro Soci

ser diferente

planes para 

piensan en l

o lo que pas

Por eso es 

sus impuest

mucho más 

En realidad 

impuestos d

de un plan d

una idea de 

patrono está

tos de Segur

• protecció

mensuale

bles—des

• protecció

mensuale

todas las 

incapacid

• protecció

suales a lo

adultos d

tados des

jubilados 

• protecció

mensuale

dores eleg
4

p

recibiendo e

bajo y ganan

de salario y 

car que su n

nombre y ap

Si hay algún 

para que pu

Dónde va

de Segur

De cada dóla

patronos pa

Social: 

• 85 centav

paga bene

jubiladas 

hijos de t

• 15 centav

que paga 

tadas y su

 Sus impu

pagan por ad

gastos admi

dos de reserv

de un centav

impuestos d

La cantid

usted paga p

de sus ganan

que paga po
5

y 

res de nuest

reconoce la 

básico de ay

salud para p

sobrevivient

personas co

¿Cuáles s

beneficio

Nosotros qu

futuro finan

los beneficio

sobrevivient

ser elegibles 

Si usted tien

beneficios d

anualmente 

Social. Esta 

de ganancia

esperar a rec

nueva Decla

meses antes 

Es import

salarios no r

den afectar s

cantidad de 

baja. Debe g

pruebas de s

la informaci

cias y benefi

pancia, debe 
6

p

nio, divorcio

con el Segu

hacer el cam

enviarle una 

enmendada. 

¿Cuáles s

para todo

Además de s

Social, noso

que usted se

programa ti

general. Pie

en términos 

la familia de 

fallecido, un 

y no puede t

después de h

El Seguro 

entre gener

económico y 

las edades. E

sual para los 

base de apoy

rios futuros

usted. Por es

de las invers

mayor alcan

puede hacer
7

tante de serv

lunes a viern

ocupadas al 

mes, así que 

mejor que ll

tenga su nú

Las perso

pueden llam

TTY al 1-800

7 p.m. de lu

Proveemo

si los solicit

Seguro Soci

para asegur

disponible p

a servirle m

También 

acerca del S

www.ssa.gov

Internet. 

Tratamos 

mente—tan

números gr

Social. Tam

usted reciba 

Por eso un s

Seguro Soci

telefónicas.
Social Security 

SSA Publication 

(Your Taxes—W

May 2000 (Destr

ICN 482095

Unit of Issue: H

Impreso en papel
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF *

AMERICA, *

*

VS. * CR NO.: 1:06-CR-197-CSC

*

RODERICK CHARLES *

MELVIN *

*

*

MOTION FOR TRANSCRIPT

Comes now the Defendant, Roderick Melvin pursuant to 18 USC

3006A, and moves for an Order that he be furnished a Transcript of the

testimony from his Suppression Hearing on October 25, 2006, without

cost to him. Defendant would represent that this transcript would

greatly assist him in preparing for a response to the Government’s

Objection to the Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation.

Malcolm R. Newman, Attorney, PC

/s/ Malcolm R. Newman

Malcolm R. Newman (NEW017)

P.O. Box 6137

Dothan, Alabama 36302

(334)792-2132

ASB-2826-M39M

Case 1:06-cr-00197-MEF-CSC Document 33 Filed 12/07/2006 Page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on December 07, 2006, I electronically filed

the forgoing with the Clerk of the Court using the SM/ECF System

which will send notification of such filing to Tommie Brown Hardwick,

Assistant U.S. Attorney.

/s/ Malcolm R. Newman

Malcolm R. Newman

Case 1:06-cr-00197-MEF-CSC Document 33 Filed 12/07/2006 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 35.4

SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

American Express Bank, FSB

American Express Issuance Trust II

Reporting Period January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2014

The undersigned, a duly
authorized officer of American Express Bank, FSB (AEFSB), a wholly-owned subsidiary of American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc. (TRS), pursuant to the Amended and Restated Supplemental Servicing Agreement, dated
as of March 12, 2013, among TRS, AEFSB, American Express Centurion Bank, and American Express Receivables Financing Corporation VIII LLC (as amended from time to time, the Agreement), does hereby certify that:

1. AEFSB performs certain servicing procedures on behalf of TRS under the Agreement.

2. The undersigned is duly authorized to execute and deliver this Certificate.

3. A review of
AEFSBs activities during the reporting period and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under my supervision.

4. To the
best of my knowledge, based on such review, AEFSB has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the reporting period.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this
27thday of March, 2015.



|                           |  |                                         
|-------------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------
|AMERICAN EXPRESS BANK, FSB
|                           | 
|By:                        |  | /s/ Denise D. Roberts                   
|Name:                      |  | Denise D. Roberts                       
|Title:                     |  | Chief Financial Officer                 
|                           | 
|By:                        |  | /s/ Brady P. Bagley                     
|Name:                      |  | Brady P. Bagley                         
|Title:                     |  | Vice President  Controller, U S Banking
# Subpart 413.3 - Simplified Acquisition Methods

**Parent topic:**PART 413 - SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION PROCEDURES

## 413.301 Governmentwide commercial purchase card.

USDA policy and procedures on use of the Governmentwide commercial purchase card are established in Departmental Regulation Series 5000.   

## 413.306 SF 44, Purchase Order-Invoice-Voucher.

The Standard Form 44 (and the previously prescribed USDA Form AD-744) is not authorized for use within USDA.   

## 413.307 Forms.

Form AD-838, Purchase Order, is prescribed for use by USDA in lieu of Optional Forms (OFs) 347 and 348 except that use of the OF 347 and OF 348 is authorized when utilizing the USDA Integrated Acquisition System.
Subpart 2030.2 - CAS Program Requirements

Parent topic: PART 2030 - COST ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

2030.201-5 Waiver.

Requests to waive Cost Accounting Standards (CAS) requirements must be submitted to the

Chairman, CAS Board by the Competition Advocate. The requests for waiver must be forwarded

through the Head of the Contracting Activity with supporting documentation and rationale in

accordance with FAR 30.201-5.
1202.7000 General.

The following abbreviations or acronyms may be used throughout the TAR and the agency's

associated internal policies and procedures in the TAM—

Table 1 to 1202.7000—Abbreviations and Acronyms

CFO Chief Financial Officer.

CIO Chief Information Officer.

COCO Chief of the Contracting Office.

COR Contracting Officer's Representative.

D&F Determination and Findings.

FOIA Freedom of Information Act.

HCA Head of the Contracting Activity.

HOA Head of the Operating Administration.

J&A Justification and Approval.

OA Operating Administration.

OIG Office of the Inspector General.

OSDBU Office of Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization.

PCR Procurement Center Representative.

RFP Request for Proposal.

SBA Small Business Administration.

SBS Small Business Specialist.
SPE Senior Procurement Executive.

Parent topic: Subpart 1202.70—Abbreviations