alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
§ 1708.110 Multiple interests. ( a ) If counsel representing a witness appears in connection with a safety investigation, counsel shall state on the record all other persons or entities counsel represents in that investigation.
( b ) When counsel does represent more than one person or entity in a safety investigation, counsel shall inform the Investigating Officer(s) and each client of counsel's possible conflict of interest in representing that client.
( c ) When an Investigating Officer(s), or the Board, as the case may be, in consultation with the Board's General Counsel, has concrete evidence that the presence of an attorney representing multiple interests would obstruct or impede the safety investigation, the Investigating Officer(s) or the Board may prohibit that attorney from being present during testimony.
( d ) The Board shall issue a written statement of the reasons supporting a decision to exclude counsel under this section within five working days following exclusion. The Board shall also delay the safety investigation for a reasonable period of time to permit retention of new counsel.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23-6376

MARQUEION JAMAL HARRISON, 

Petitioner - Appellant, 

v. 

MR. JACOBS, 

Respondent - Appellee. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at 

Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:21-hc-02118-BO) 

Submitted: August 29, 2023 Decided: September 1, 2023

Before KING, AGEE, and BENJAMIN, Circuit Judges. 

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Marqueion Harrison, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 

USCA4 Appeal: 23-6376 Doc: 19 Filed: 09/01/2023 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM: 

Marqueion Harrison seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 

28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge 

issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A). A certificate of 

appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional 

right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a 

prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists could find the 

district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck v. 

Davis, 580 U.S. 100, 115-17 (2017). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is 

debatable and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional 

right. Gonzalez v. Thaler, 565 U.S. 134, 140-41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 

473, 484 (2000)). 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Harrison has not 

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and 

dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions 

are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. 

DISMISSED

USCA4 Appeal: 23-6376 Doc: 19 Filed: 09/01/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
Exhibit 31.2

                              CERTIFICATION PURSANT
                     TO SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT RULE 13A-14

I, Yona Liebowitz, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Clean Systems
Technology Group, Ltd.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this
quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) Presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls
subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective
actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.


Dated: April 12, 2005



By: /S/ YONA LIEBOWITZ
---------------------------
Yona Liebowitz
Chief Financial Officer
Subpart 1523.3 - Hazardous Material and

Material Safety Data

Parent topic: PART 1523 - ENVIRONMENTAL, CONSERVATION, OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY, AND

DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE

1523.303 Contract clause.

1523.303-70 Protection of human subjects.

Contracting Officers shall insert the contract clause at 1552.223-70 when the contract involves

human test subjects.

1523.303-71 Decontamination of Government-furnished

property.

Contracting Officers shall insert the contract clause at 1552.245-70, Decontamination of

Government-Furnished Property, when it is anticipated that a Contractor will use Governmentfurnished or Contractor-acquired property in the clean-up of hazardous or toxic substances in the

environment.

1523.303-72 Use and care of laboratory animals.

Contracting officers shall insert the clause at 1552.223-72, Use and Care of Laboratory Animals, in

all contracts involving the use of animals in testing, research or training.
|                                           |
|-------------------------------------------|
|                                           |  |  |
| NETHERLAND, SEWELL & ASSOCIATES, INC. |
|                                      |   |   |
|                                      | By: | /s/ Danny D. Simmons |
|                                      |   | Danny D. Simmons, P.E. |
|                                      |   | President and Chief Operating Officer |
|                                      |   |   |
|                                      |   |   |
|                                      |   |   |
|                                      |   |   |
|                                      |   |   |
|                                      |   |   |
|                                      |   |   |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |  |  |  |
|   | Please be advised that the digital document you are viewing is provided by Netherland, Sewell & Associates, Inc. (NSAI) as a convenience to our clients.  The digital document is intended to be substantively the same as the original signed document maintained by NSAI.  The digital document is subject to the parameters, limitations, and conditions stated in the original document.  In the event of any differences between the digital document and the original document, the original document shall control and supersede the digital document. |
|   |
|   |
# Subpart 2143.1 - General

**Parent topic:**PART 2143 - CONTRACT MODIFICATIONS

## 2143.101 Definitions.

The effective date of a FEGLI contract modification is as defined in FAR 43.101, except to the extent that the definition conflicts with LIFAR 2101.370.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Franklyn Montilla, Appellant.

Submitted November 5, 2007;

decided November 15, 2007

Reported below, 37 AD3d 281.

Motion for assignment of counsel granted and Steven Banks, Esq., the Legal Aid Society, 199 Water Street, New York, NY 10038 assigned as counsel to the appellant on the appeal herein.
Exhibit 32.1

              CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63
                      OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE

         In connection with the quarterly report of Simclar, Inc. (the
"company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Barry J. Pardon, President of the company, hereby certify as of the date hereof,
solely for purpose of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States
Code, that to the best of my knowledge:

                  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

                  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the company.

         This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, "filed" with
the Securities and Exchange Commission.



                                            /s/ Barry J. Pardon
                                            --------------------------------
                                            Barry J. Pardon, President
                                            Simclar, Inc.
                                            November 12, 2004
§ 207.3 Method of collecting energy information under ESECA. ( a ) Whenever the Administrator determines that: ( 1 ) Certain energy information is necessary to assist in the formulation of energy policy or to carry out the purposes of the ESECA of the EPAA; and
( 2 ) Such energy information is not available to DOE under the authority of statutes other than ESECA or that such energy information should, as a matter of discretion, be collected under the authority of ESECA; He shall require reports of such information to be submitted to DOE at least every ninety calendar days.
( b ) The Administrator may require such reports of any person who is engaged in the production, processing, refining, transportation by pipeline, or distribution (at other than the retail level) of energy resources.
( c ) The Administrator may require such reports by rule, order, questionnaire, or such other means as he determines appropriate.
( d ) Whenever reports of energy information are requested under this subpart, the rule, order, questionnaire, or other means requesting such reports shall contain (or be accompanied by) a recital that such reports are being requested under the authority of ESECA.
( e ) In addition to requiring reports, the Administrator may, at his discretion, in order to obtain energy information under the authority of ESECA: ( 1 ) Sign and issue subpoenas in accordance with the provisions of § 205.8 of this chapter for the attendance and testimony of witnesses and the production of books, records, papers, and other documents;
( 2 ) Require any person, by rule or order, to submit answers in writing to interrogatories, requests for reports or for other information, with such answers or other submissions made within such reasonable period as is specified in the rule or order, and under oath; and
( 3 ) Administer oaths. Any such subpoena or rule or order shall contain (or be accompanied by) a recital that energy information is requested under the authority of ESECA.
( f ) For the purpose of verifying the accuracy of any energy information requested, acquired, or collected by the DOE, the Administrator, or any officer or employee duly designated by him, upon presenting appropriate credentials and a written notice from the Administrator to the owner, operator, or agent in charge, may— ( 1 ) Enter, at reasonable times, any business premise of facility; and
( 2 ) Inspect, at reasonable times and in a reasonable manner, any such premise or facility, inventory and sample any stock of energy resources therein, and examine and copy books, records, papers, or other documents, relating to any such energy information.
Such written notice shall reasonably describe the premise or facility to be inspected, the stock to be inventoried or sampled, or the books, records, papers or other documents to be examined or copied.
#### Curry *v.*Jackson National Bank.

May 13, 1913.

Intervention. Before Judge Daniel. Butts superior court. June 13, 1912. '

*O. L. Redman*and *O. M. Dulce,*for plaintiff in error.

*H. M. Fletcher,*contra.

The majority of the court are of the opinion that there was sufficient evidence to support the verdict rendered in this case.

*Jtidgment affirmed.*

*Beck and Atkinson, JJ., dissent. The other Justices concur.*
IV 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 339 

Congratulating the San Antonio Spurs for winning the 2005 National 

Basketball Association Championship. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 24, 2005 

Mr. SMITH of Texas (for himself, Mr. BONILLA, Mr. GONZALEZ, Mr. 

CUELLAR, and Mrs. CHRISTENSEN) submitted the following resolution; 

which was referred to the Committee on Government Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Congratulating the San Antonio Spurs for winning the 2005 

National Basketball Association Championship. 

Whereas on June 23, 2005, the San Antonio Spurs won the 

National Basketball Association’s (NBA) Championship 

with an 81–74 victory over the Detroit Pistons; 

Whereas the Spurs’ win resulted in their third NBA championship title in franchise history; 

Whereas the Spurs competed against the Pistons to win the 

series 4–3; 

Whereas the Detroit Pistons and their coach, Larry Brown, 

put up a battle worthy of a championship series; 

Whereas under the guidance of Coach Gregg Popovich, the 

Spurs’ Tim Duncan, Manu Ginobili, Tony Parker, Robert 
2 

•HRES 339 IH 

Horry, Bruce Bowen, Nazr Mohammed, Brent Barry, 

Beno Udrih, Rasho Nesterovic, Glenn Robinson, Devin 

Brown, and Tony Massenburg played valiantly to bring 

the NBA trophy back home to San Antonio; 

Whereas congratulations are due as well to the Spurs’ owners, Peter and Julianna Holt, and all of the other people 

in the Spurs’ organization. 

Whereas Tim Duncan was for the third time named the 

finals’ Most Valuable Player following the Spurs’ victory; 

Whereas Coach Gregg Popovich is only one of two active 

coaches to win three championship titles and only the 

fifth in league history; and 

Whereas San Antonio has the best hometown crowd in the 

league and the Alamo City is the perfect setting for a 

championship celebration: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives con2 gratulates the San Antonio Spurs and Coach Gregg 

3 Popovich for another exciting basketball season and for 

4 winning the 2005 National Basketball Association Cham5 pionship. 

Æ
###### Editorial Note on Part 4

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 4 appear at 77 FR 39904, July 6, 2012.

#### § 4.2 Subparts.

Subpart A sets forth rules applicable to title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and title IV of the Energy Reorganization Act of 1974. (The Acts are collectively referred to in subpart A as “the Act”.) Subpart B sets forth rules applicable specifically to matters pertaining to section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended. Subpart C sets forth rules pertaining to the provisions of the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, as amended, Pub. L. 94-135 (89 Stat. 713; 42 U.S.C. 3001 note), Pub. L. 95-478 (92 Stat. 1513; 42 U.S.C. 3001 note), which relates to nondiscrimination on the basis of age in any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance.

[52 FR 25358, July 7, 1987]
Editorial Note on Part 34
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 34 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

§ 34.8 Information collection requirements: OMB approval. ( a ) The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has submitted the information collection requirements contained in this part to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for approval as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 *et seq.*). The NRC may nor conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. OMB has approved the information collection requirements contained in this part under control number 3150-0007.
( b ) The approved information collection requirements contained in this part appear in §§ 34.13, 34.20, 34.25, 34.27, 34.29, 34.31, 34.33, 34.35, 34.41, 34.42, 34.43, 34.45, 34.47, 34.49, 34.61, 34.63, 34.65, 34.67, 34.69, 34.71, 34.73, 34.75, 34.79, 34.81, 34.83, 34.85, 34.87, 34.89, 34.101, 34.111, and appendix A.
( c ) This part contains information collection requirements in addition to those approved under the control number specified in paragraph (a) of this section. The information collection requirements and the control numbers under which it is approved are as follows: ( 1 ) In § 34.11, NRC Form 313 is approved under control number 3150-0120.
( 2 ) [Reserved]
[62 FR 52186, Oct. 6, 1997, as amended at 75 FR 73942, Nov. 30, 2010; 85 FR 65662, Oct. 16, 2020]
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

WILLIAM BROWN, JR., )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:06cv793-CSC

)

COMMISSIONER OF )

SOCIAL SECURITY, )

)

Defendant. )

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

On March 21, 2007, the defendant filed a motion to remand pursuant to sentence four

of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). See Doc. # 14. The plaintiff has not objected to the motion to remand.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(1) and M.D. Ala. LR 73.1, the parties have consented to the

United States Magistrate Judge conducting all proceedings in this case and ordering the entry

of final judgment. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that the defendant’s motion to remand (doc. # 14) be and is hereby

GRANTED. It is further

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the decision of the Commissioner be and is hereby

REVERSED and this case be and is hereby REMANDED to the Commissioner pursuant to

sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further proceedings.

Done this 10th day of April, 2007.

 /s/Charles S. Coody 

CHARLES S. COODY

CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00793-CSC Document 17 Filed 04/10/07 Page 1 of 1
# Official Journal L 87I/2022

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 087I |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6515 March 2022 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 087I

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6515 March 2022

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/427 of 15 March 2022 implementing Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine | 1 |
| | * | Council Regulation (EU) 2022/428 of 15 March 2022 amending Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia's actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine | 13 |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/429 of 15 March 2022 amending Decision 2014/145/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine | 44 |
| | * | Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/430 of 15 March 2022 amending Decision 2014/512/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine | 56 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/427 of 15 March 2022 implementing Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine

1

*

Council Regulation (EU) 2022/428 of 15 March 2022 amending Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia's actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine

13

DECISIONS

*

Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/429 of 15 March 2022 amending Decision 2014/145/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine

44

*

Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/430 of 15 March 2022 amending Decision 2014/512/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine

56

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
EXHIBIT 99.3

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350,  As Adopted Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  Granite Real Estate Investment Trust

In
connection with the annual report of Granite Real Estate Investment Trust (the "Company") on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015 (the "Report") to
which this certification is an exhibit, I, Michael Forsayeth, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

Date:
March 2, 2016

By:

/s/ MICHAEL FORSAYETH Name: Michael Forsayeth
Title: Chief Financial Officer


---





EXHIBIT 99.3

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350,  As Adopted Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  Granite REIT Inc.

In
connection with the annual report of Granite REIT Inc. (the "Company") on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015 (the "Report") to which this
certification is an exhibit, I, Michael Forsayeth, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

Date:
March 2, 2016

By:

/s/ MICHAEL FORSAYETH Name: Michael Forsayeth
Title: Chief Financial Officer


---



QuickLinks
# Subpart 2122.1 - Basic Labor Policies

**Parent topic:**PART 2122 - APPLICATION OF LABOR LAWS TO GOVERNMENT ACQUISITIONS

## 2122.170 Contract clauses.

The provisions at FAR sections 52.222-21, 52.222-22, 52-222.25 are implemented by changing the word “offeror” to “Contractor” and the word “solicitation” to “contract” wherever they appear in the text to reflect the FEGLI Program's statutory exemption from competitive bidding (5 U.S.C. 8709), which obviates the issuance of solicitations.