alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
DOCSBHM\1428080\1\

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

MICHAEL B. BROOKS,

Plaintiff,

v.

DAIMLERCHRYSLER FINANCIAL

SERVICES AMERICAS LLC, et al.,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CASE NO. 2:06-cv-00764-MEF

MOTION TO REMAND

COMES the Defendant, DaimlerChrysler Financial Services Americas LLC, and

moves this Court for an Order remanding the case to the Circuit Court of Montgomery County,

Alabama from which it was removed on the following grounds:

1. Defendant inadvertently failed to see that the Plaintiff had limited the

amount of damages sought in his Complaint to $74,500.00, regardless of what types of damages

and what claims are being made against this Defendant. Because the amount in controversy is

less than $75,000.00, exclusive of interest and costs, there is no diversity jurisdiction under 28

U.S.C. § 1332. This case was inadvertently removed to federal court, and should be remanded

by this Court, to the Circuit Court of Montgomery County, Alabama where it was originally

filed.

2. The Plaintiff’s attorney agrees with and consents to this Motion.

Case 2:06-cv-00764-MEF-DRB Document 1 Filed 08/28/2006 Page 1 of 2
DOCSBHM\1428080\1\ 2

Respectfully submitted,

s/ C. Lee Reeves

C. Lee Reeves

Attorney for Defendant

DAIMLERCHRYSLER FINANCIAL SERVICES

AMERICAS LLC

OF COUNSEL:

SIROTE & PERMUTT, P.C.

2311 Highland Avenue South

Post Office Box 55727

Birmingham, AL 35255-5727

Tel.: (205) 930-5100

Fax: (205) 930-5335

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on the 28

th

day of August 2006, I electronically filed the

foregoing with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of

such filing to the following and I hereby certify that I have mailed by U.S. mail the foregoing to

the following:

Christina D. Crow, Esq.

Jinks, Daniel & Crow

219 North Prairie Street

Post Office Box 350

Union Springs, AL 36089

Joseph G. Stewart, Jr., Esq.

Joseph G. Stewart, Jr., P.C.

Post Office Box 911

Montgomery, AL 36101-0911

s/ C. Lee Reeves

Of Counsel

Case 2:06-cv-00764-MEF-DRB Document 1 Filed 08/28/2006 Page 2 of 2
Subpart 2805.2 - Synopses of Proposed

Contract Actions

Parent topic: PART 2805 - PUBLICIZING CONTRACT ACTIONS

2805.202 Exceptions.

The HCA or designee is the agency head for the purposes of the determination required by FAR

5.202(b).
IV 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 275 

Recognizing and honoring the work of Southwest Washington Independent 

Forward Thrust and its members. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 12, 2005 

Mr. BAIRD submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Government Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing and honoring the work of Southwest Washington 

Independent Forward Thrust and its members. 

Whereas nonprofit organizations enrich the fabric of our communities through their positive impacts on culture, the 

arts, social services, civic matters, and educational endeavors; 

Whereas Southwest Washington Independent Forward 

Thrust was founded in 1975 to improve the lives of the 

people in southwestern Washington State; 

Whereas SWIFT grants provide funds for public art, playgrounds, peer mediation programs for the prevention of 

school violence, community kitchens for feeding the 

homeless, and dental and health care clinics for uninsured families; and 
2 

•HRES 275 IH 

Whereas such an organization is due recognition for its service to the Nation: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) congratulates Southwest Washington Inde3 pendent Forward Thrust on the occasion of the 30th 

4 anniversary of its founding; and 

5 (2) recognizes and honors the work of South6 west Washington Independent Forward Thrust and 

7 its members for their continuing selfless efforts to 

8 improve the lives of countless persons and families. 

Æ
Case 3:06-cr-00195-MEF-CSC Document 3 Filed 08/16/2006 Page 1 of 1
Case 2:06-cr-00200-WHA-CSC Document 21 Filed 07/21/2006 Page 1 of 1
Case 2:06-cr-00200-WHA-CSC Document 21-2 Filed 07/21/2006 Page 1 of 1
Case 2:06-cv-00790-WC Document 39 Filed 04/25/2007 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:06-cv-00790-WC Document 39 Filed 04/25/2007 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:06-cv-00790-WC Document 39 Filed 04/25/2007 Page 3 of 3
Exhibit 35.3a



|     |  |  |  |                    
|---- |  |  |  | -------------------
|LOGO |  |  |  | 3001 Hackberry Road
|     |  |  |  | Irving, TX 75063   

SERVICER COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION

This Servicer Compliance Certification is issued pursuant to the Tax Outsourcing Agreement dated as of May 28, 2009 (together with all amendments
thereto, the Agreement), between Cenlar FSB (Bank) and CoreLogic Tax Services, LLC (CoreLogic).

I, Teik Franics, an
authorized officer of CoreLogic, certify to Bank and with the knowledge and intent that it will rely upon this certification, that:

1.
The servicing information required to be provided to Bank by CoreLogic under the Agreement has been so provided;

2. I am responsible for
reviewing the activities performed by CoreLogic under the Agreement and, based upon my knowledge and in all material respects throughout the relevant reporting period, CoreLogic has fulfilled its obligations under the Agreement.

3. Attached to this Servicer Compliance Certification is a list of all material failures and the nature and status thereof. [NONE/NO
ATTACHMENT]



|                            |  |                  
|--------------------------- |  | -----------------
|CORELOGIC TAX SERVICES, LLC
|                            | 
|By:                         |  | /s/ Teik Francis 
|                            |  | Teik Francis     
|                            |  | Vice President II
|                            |  | February 14, 2017





A-1 of 1
PGI 207.302 Policy.

See the memorandum from Assistant Secretary of Defense (Manpower and Reserve Affairs) dated

April 21, 2016, entitled “Update on OMB Circular A-76 Public-Private Competition Prohibitions-FY

2016,” regarding the ongoing Governmentwide moratorium and restrictions on public-private

competitions. The restrictions prohibit the conversion of any work currently performed (or

designated for performance) by civilian personnel to contract performance.

Parent topic: PGI 207.3 -CONTRACTOR VERSUS GOVERNMENT PERFORMANCE
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

December 13, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 131732 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, DARE REDMOND, Personal Representative Justices 

of the Estate of DERRICK KELLY, Deceased,

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 131732 

 COA: 265760 

Washtenaw CC: 04-000036-NO 

CITY OF DETROIT,

Defendant, 

and 

LOU GIANINO, JAYME TRAVIS, 

JENNIFER G. NAVALTA, and SCOTT 

STANISKY, 

Defendants-Appellees. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 15, 2006 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

KELLY, J., would grant leave to appeal. 

d1206 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

December 13, 2006 

 Clerk
2424.203 Policy.       See 24 CFR part 15 for the HUD regulations which implement the Freedom of Information Act.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 2424.2 - Freedom of Information Act
# Subpart 1417.2 - Options

**Parent topic:**PART 1417 - SPECIAL CONTRACTING METHODS

## 1417.203 Solicitations.

Option quantities in excess of the 50 percent limit may, in unusual circumstances, be approved by the CCO.   

## 1417.206 Evaluation.

The determination in FAR 17.206(b) shall be approved by the CCO prior to soliciting offers.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

vs. ) CR. NO. 3:06cr204-MEF

)

HENRY ERIK YAPIAS )

ORDER

For good cause, it is hereby

ORDERED that the hearing on the defendant’s motion for a psychiatric examination

presently set for February 9, 2007 at 9:00 a.m. in Courtroom 4B be and is hereby MOVED

to Courtroom 5B, United States Courthouse Complex, One Church Street, Montgomery,

Alabama. 

The Clerk is directed to provide a court reporter for this proceeding. If the defendant

is in custody, the United States Marshal or the person having custody of the defendant shall

produce the defendant for the proceeding.

Done this 7 day of February 2007. th

 /s/Charles S. Coody 

CHARLES S. COODY

CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 3:06-cr-00204-MEF-CSC Document 37 Filed 02/07/2007 Page 1 of 1
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

GONZALO GOMEZ-MORALES,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 10-10249

D.C. No. 2:91-cr-00139-EHC

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

Earl H. Carroll, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 15, 2011** 

Before: CANBY, FERNANDEZ, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges. 

 Gonzalo Gomez-Morales appeals pro se from the district court’s order

denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion for modification of sentence. We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Gomez contends that Amendment 591 to the United States Sentencing

FILED

FEB 28 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 10-10249

Guidelines, clarifying the application of U.S.S.G. § 2D1.2, authorizes the district

court to resentence him. The record reflects that Gomez’s base offense level was

calculated under § 2D1.1(c)(1), rather than § 2D1.2; therefore Amendment 591

does not apply to him. Accordingly, Gomez cannot demonstrate that his sentence

is based on a sentencing range that has subsequently been lowered by the

Sentencing Commission, as required by § 3582(c)(2). See United States v.

Leniear, 574 F.3d 668, 673 (9th Cir. 2009). 

Gomez also contends that he is entitled to relief under Amendment 591

because the drug quantity used to calculate his base offense level was determined

by the sentencing court, rather than a jury. This argument is foreclosed. See

Dillon v. United States, 130 S. Ct. 2683, 2692 (2010) (proceedings under

§ 3582(c)(2) do not implicate the Sixth Amendment right to have essential facts

found by a jury beyond a reasonable doubt).

AFFIRMED.
7.204 Responsibilities of contracting officers.

(a) The contracting officer shall submit a referral to the material planner citing the proposed the

economic purchase quantity. Material planners will use this data to evaluate economic order

quantities for supplies and shall advise the contracting officer of any change to the original

requirement.

Parent topic: SUBPART 7.2 – PLANNING FOR THE PURCHASE OF SUPPLIES IN ECONOMIC

QUANTITIES
1808.870 Contract clause.       The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 1852.208–81, Restrictions on Printing and Duplicating, in solicitations and contracts where there is a requirement for any printing, and/or any duplicating/copying in excess of that described in paragraph (c) of the clause.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 1808.8—Acquisition of Printing and Related Supplies
839.000 Scope of part.       This part prescribes acquisition policies and procedures for use in acquiring VA information technology and information technology-related contracts (*see* 802.101) and applies to both VA-procured information technology systems as well as interagency acquisitions defined in FAR part 17 and part 817.    **Parent topic:** PART 839 - ACQUISITION OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

V. ) Case No.: 2:06-mj-082-SRW

)

KIMBERLY JOYCE SELLERS )

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

COMES NOW the undersigned counsel, Anne E. Borelli, and enters her appearance on

behalf of Defendant, Kimberly Joyce Sellers, in the above-styled case.

Dated this 18 day of August 2006. th

Respectfully submitted,

s/ Anne E. Borelli

ANNE E. BORELLI

Assistant Federal Defender

201 Monroe Street, Suite 407

Montgomery, Alabama 36104

Phone: (334) 834-2099

Fax: (334) 834-0353

E-mail:anne_borelli @fd.org

AL Bar Code: BOR -016

Case 2:06-mj-00082-SRW Document 6 Filed 08/18/2006 Page 1 of 2
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

V. ) Case No.: 2:06-mj-082-SRW

)

KIMBERLY JOYCE SELLERS )

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on August 18, 2006, I electronically filed the foregoing with the

Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing to the

following: 

David E. Cooke, Esquire

Assistant United States Attorney 

One Court Square, Suite 201

Montgomery, Alabama 36104

Respectfully submitted,

s/ Anne E. Borelli

ANNE E. BORELLI

Assistant Federal Defender

201 Monroe Street, Suite 407

Montgomery, Alabama 36104

Phone: (334) 834-2099

Fax: (334) 834-0353

E-mail:anne_borelli @fd.org

AL Bar Code: BOR -016

Case 2:06-mj-00082-SRW Document 6 Filed 08/18/2006 Page 2 of 2
# Subpart 2451.70 - Contractor Use of Government Discount Travel Rates

**Parent topic:**PART 2451 - USE OF GOVERNMENT SOURCES BY CONTRACTORS

## 2451.7001 Contract clause.

The Contracting Officer shall insert the clause at 48 CFR 2452.251-70, Contractor Employee Travel, in cost-reimbursement solicitations and contracts involving contractor travel.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           39441
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                            2186
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                  3740
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     290894
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                         842499
<ALLOWANCE>                                       7485
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1227643
<DEPOSITS>                                      947488
<SHORT-TERM>                                     80126
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              12157
<LONG-TERM>                                      58072
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         10151
<OTHER-SE>                                      119649
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 1227643
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  18103
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                 4282
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    87
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 22472
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                8436
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                1508
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            12528
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      366
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 469
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                   7899
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   6796
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                        6796
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      4673
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .44
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .43
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       0
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                     0
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                    0
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
#### § 110.19 Types of licenses.

Licenses for the export and import of nuclear equipment and material in this part consist of general licenses and specific licenses. A general license is effective without the filing of an application with the Commission or the issuance of licensing documents to a particular person. A specific license is issued to a named person and is effective upon approval by the Commission of an application filed pursuant to the regulations in this part and issuance of licensing documents to the applicant.

[75 FR 44087, July 28, 2010]
#### § 216.6 Petition for reconsideration.

If DOE, after evaluating an application in accordance with § 216.4, does not determine that the energy program or project maximizes domestic energy supplies or does not find that the supplies of materials and equipment, services, or facilities described in the application are critical and essential to an eligible energy program or project, it will so notify the applicant and the applicant may petition DOE for reconsideration. If DOE concludes at any time that findings previously made are no longer valid and should be withdrawn, DOE will so notify the affected applicant(s), and such applicant(s) may petition DOE for reconsideration of the withdrawal decision. A petition is deemed accepted when received by DOE at the address stated in § 216.8. DOE will consider the petition for reconsideration and either grant or deny the relief requested. Written notice of the decision and of the reasons for the decision will be provided to the applicant. There has not been an exhaustion of administrative remedies until a petition for reconsideration has been submitted and the review procedure completed by grant or denial of the relief requested. The denial of relief requested in a petition for reconsideration is a final administrative decision.

[43 FR 6212, Feb. 14, 1978, as amended at 51 FR 8312, Mar. 11, 1986; 73 FR 10984, Feb. 29, 2008]
§ 1042.230 Transition plans. ( a ) *Submission of plans.* An institution to which § 1042.225 applies and that is composed of more than one administratively separate unit may submit either a single transition plan applicable to all such units, or a separate transition plan applicable to each such unit.
( b ) *Content of plans.* In order to be approved by the Secretary of Education, a transition plan shall: ( 1 ) State the name, address, and Federal Interagency Committee on Education Code of the educational institution submitting such plan, the administratively separate units to which the plan is applicable, and the name, address, and telephone number of the person to whom questions concerning the plan may be addressed. The person who submits the plan shall be the chief administrator or president of the institution, or another individual legally authorized to bind the institution to all actions set forth in the plan.
( 2 ) State whether the educational institution or administratively separate unit admits students of both sexes as regular students and, if so, when it began to do so.
( 3 ) Identify and describe with respect to the educational institution or administratively separate unit any obstacles to admitting students without discrimination on the basis of sex.
( 4 ) Describe in detail the steps necessary to eliminate as soon as practicable each obstacle so identified and indicate the schedule for taking these steps and the individual directly responsible for their implementation.
( 5 ) Include estimates of the number of students, by sex, expected to apply for, be admitted to, and enter each class during the period covered by the plan.
( c ) *Nondiscrimination.* No policy or practice of a recipient to which § 1042.225 applies shall result in treatment of applicants to or students of such recipient in violation of §§ 1042.300 through 1042.310 unless such treatment is necessitated by an obstacle identified in paragraph (b)(3) of this section and a schedule for eliminating that obstacle has been provided as required by paragraph (b)(4) of this section.
( d ) *Effects of past exclusion.* To overcome the effects of past exclusion of students on the basis of sex, each educational institution to which § 1042.225 applies shall include in its transition plan, and shall implement, specific steps designed to encourage individuals of the previously excluded sex to apply for admission to such institution. Such steps shall include instituting recruitment programs that emphasize the institution's commitment to enrolling students of the sex previously excluded.
#### § 958.44 Reserve fund.

At the end of each fiscal period, funds in excess of the committee's expenses may be placed in an operating reserve not to exceed approximately 1 fiscal year's operational expenses or such lower limits as the committee, with the approval of the Secretary, may establish. Also, the committee, with the approval of the Secretary, may include in its budget an item for such reserve. Funds in the reserve shall be available for use by the committee for expenses authorized pursuant to § 958.40. Funds in excess of those placed in the operating reserve shall be refunded to handlers. Each handler's share of such excess shall be the amount he paid in excess of his pro rata share of the expenses of the committee.

[32 FR 11261, Aug. 3, 1967]
Exhibit 35.1




Servicer Compliance Statement of Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation









NISSAN MOTOR ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION




OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE




The undersigned, Mark Kaczynski, President and Chief Executive Officer of NISSAN MOTOR ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION, a California corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify, in his capacity as such corporate officer, as follows:




(1)           The undersigned has caused a review of the activities of the Company, in its capacity as Servicer, during the period January 16, 2013 through March 31, 2013 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance pursuant to the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of January 16, 2013 (the “Agreement”), by and among the Company, individually and as servicer, Nissan Auto Receivables Corporation II, as seller, and Nissan Auto Receivables 2013-A Owner Trust, to be conducted under his supervision; and




(2)           To the best of the undersigned’s knowledge, based upon such review, the Company has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.




This Officer’s Certificate is being furnished pursuant to Item 1123 of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB for publicly-issued asset-backed securities.  Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings assigned to such terms in the Agreement.




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have set my hand effective as of the 27th day of June, 2013.




/s/ Mark Kaczynski_________________


Mark Kaczynski


President and Chief Executive Officer