alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 35.1

SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc.

American Express Issuance Trust II

Reporting Period January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2017

The undersigned, a duly authorized representative of American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc. (TRS), as Servicer pursuant to the
American Express Issuance Trust II (the Trust) Second Amended and Restated Servicing Agreement, dated as of July 29, 2016 (as so amended and restated and as otherwise amended from time to time, the Agreement), among
American Express Receivables Financing Corporation VIII LLC, as transferor, TRS, as servicer (in such capacity, the Servicer), and The Bank of New York Mellon, as indenture trustee (the Trustee), does hereby certify that:

1. TRS is Servicer under the Agreement.

2. The
undersigned is duly authorized as required pursuant to the Agreement to execute and deliver this Certificate.

3. A review of the Servicers
activities during the reporting period and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under my supervision.

4. To the best of my knowledge,
based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the reporting period.

IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 16th day of March, 2018.





|                                                       |  |               
|------------------------------------------------------ |  | --------------
|AMERICAN EXPRESS TRAVEL RELATED SERVICES COMPANY, INC.
|                                                       | 
|By:                                                    |  | /s/ J J Anand 
|Name:                                                  |  | J J Anand     
|Title:                                                 |  | Vice President
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

NORTHERN DIVISION 

OWEN J. ROGAL, D.D.S., P.C., 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

SKILSTAF, INC., 

 Defendant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CIVIL ACTION NO. 

3:06-cv-00728-MHT 

FILED UNDER SEAL

INDEX TO EXHIBITS

Case 3:06-cv-00728-MHT-WC Document 40 Filed 05/18/2007 Page 1 of 3
2

In support of Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment, Defendant 

Skilstaf, Inc. will submit contemporaneously herewith the Affidavit of Robert 

Johnson and, pursuant to the Protective Order entered by the Court on January 11, 

2007, will submit contemporaneously herewith under seal the following exhibits. 

Exhibit A: The Summary Plan Description for the Skilstaf Group Health Plan, 

Skilstaf-00001 through Skilstaf-00085. 

Exhibit B: Excerpts from Skilstaf-00085 through Skilstaf-02129, which is the 

Administrative Record. 

Respectfully Submitted, 

 s/Charles A. Stewart III 

Charles A. Stewart III (STE067) 

Bradley Arant Rose & White LLP

The Alabama Center for Commerce 

401 Adams Avenue, Suite 780 

Montgomery, AL 36104 

Telephone: (334) 956-7700 

Facsimile: (334) 956-7701 

cstewart@bradleyarant.com

 

 s/Amelia T. Driscoll 

Amelia T. Driscoll (DRI016) 

Bradley Arant Rose & White LLP

1819 Fifth Avenue North 

Birmingham, AL 35203-2104 

Telephone: (205) 521-8000 

Facsimile: (205) 521-8800 

adriscoll@bradleyarant.com

Attorneys for Defendant 

Skilstaf, Inc. 

Case 3:06-cv-00728-MHT-WC Document 40 Filed 05/18/2007 Page 2 of 3
3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on May 18th, 2007, I electronically filed the foregoing 

with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system, which will send notification 

of such filing to the following: 

Robert E. Cole 

437 Chestnut Street, Suite 218 

Philadelphia, PA 19109 

Beth A. Friel 

Jeanne L. Bakker 

Montgomery, McCracken, Walker & Rhoads 

123 South Broad Street 

Philadelphia, PA 19109 

and I hereby certify that I have mailed by U. S. Postal Service the document to the 

following non-CM/ECF participants: None. 

/s/ Amelia T. Driscoll 

Case 3:06-cv-00728-MHT-WC Document 40 Filed 05/18/2007 Page 3 of 3
Case 3:06-cv-00728-MHT-WC Document 40-2 Filed 05/18/2007 Page 1 of 4
Case 3:06-cv-00728-MHT-WC Document 40-2 Filed 05/18/2007 Page 2 of 4
Case 3:06-cv-00728-MHT-WC Document 40-2 Filed 05/18/2007 Page 3 of 4
Case 3:06-cv-00728-MHT-WC Document 40-2 Filed 05/18/2007 Page 4 of 4
2436.602-5 Short selection processes for contracts not to exceed the small purchase limitation.       The short selection process described in FAR 36.602-5(a) is authorized for use for contracts not expected to exceed the simplified acquisition threshold.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 2436.6 - Architect-Engineer Services
Subpart 922.1 - Basic Labor Policies    **Parent topic:** PART 922 - APPLICATION OF LABOR LAWS TO GOVERNMENT ACQUISITION922.103 Overtime.922.103-4 Approvals.       (d)          (1)  			Where the cost to the Government may be affected, approval of hours of work in excess of the normal workweek is justified only in those instances and for those employees where it can be shown that overtime would provide needed and demonstrable impetus to the accomplishment of Department of Energy (DOE) objectives and that all other means of meeting these objectives have been considered and found inadequate or not feasible. Accordingly, the Heads of Contracting Activities shall -          (i) Establish controls to prevent excess casual overtime and to assure that such overtime work is in the best interest of the Government. Casual overtime means -          (A) Work in excess of the normal workweek (or in excess of an authorized extended workweek) which cannot be regularly scheduled in advance; or          (B) Regularly scheduled work in excess of the normal workweek for a period of four consecutive weeks or less; and          (ii) Establish controls to assure that any use of any extended workweek schedule is in the best interest of the Government. Extended workweek means a workweek regularly scheduled and established in excess of the normal workweek for a period in excess of four consecutive weeks.922.103-5 Contract clauses.       In accordance with 48 CFR 22.101-1(e) and 48 CFR 22.103-5, the contracting officer shall insert the clause at 48 CFR 52.222-1, Notice to the Government of Labor Disputes, in all solicitations and contracts for protective services at DOE owned facilities requiring continuity of services for public safety and national security reasons. The contracting officer may insert this clause in other solicitations and contracts where a significant need for continuity in contract performance exists. See subpart 937.70, Protective Services Contracting, for additional policy guidance regarding protective services.
# Subpart 2406.2 - Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources

**Parent topic:**PART 2406 - COMPETITION REQUIREMENTS

## 2406.202 Establishing or maintaining alternative sources.

(b) 				

(1)  			The HCA shall sign the Determination and Finding (D&F) required by FAR 6.202(b)(1).
# Subpart 5242.1 - CONTRACT AUDIT SERVICES

**Parent topic:**Part 5242 - CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION AND AUDIT SERVICES

## 5242.191 Audit resolution and disposition.

   (a) Resolution of findings/recommendations in reportable contract audit reports, as defined in DOD Instruction 7640.02, other than pre-award audits, is required within six months of report 

issuance. When an audit’s findings/recommendations are resolved, they shall be supported, in the official contract file, by a negotiation memorandum, if applicable; a memorandum for the record; or other appropriate specific written documentation in the file. Disposition, including fund recovery actions, shall take place as soon as possible after resolution.

   (b) HCAs are responsible for establishing procedures to accomplish audit resolution and disposition within the required times and to comply with the DOD Instruction 7640.02, Policy for Follow-Up on Contract Audit Reports. Semiannual (March 31 and September 30 of each year) reporting requirements shall be conducted through routine and timely entry of resolved, unresolved, dispositioned, or in litigation or investigation and document forward date within the CAFU DCMA eTools system at www.dcma.mil. If the resolution and disposition of reportable contract audit reports become over-age, documentation of actions taken to achieve resolution and disposition shall be recorded within the CAFU DCMA eTools system monthly. DASN(P) PA&BT is the DON liaison.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

 FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

vs. ) CASE NUMBER: 2:06-CR-00202-WKW

)

EUGENE L. CLECKLER )

EUGENE CLECKLER’S REQUESTED VOIR DIRE

COMES NOW Eugene L. Cleckler, and hereby requests the following

questions be asked of the prospective jury venire: 

1. Do you own or operate a business with the power to hire and fire

employees? In that capacity, have you ever had the occasion to fire employees for

any reason? Have you ever had the occasion to accuse an employee of fraud or

deception?

2. Have any of you ever been fired from a job? Has anyone ever been

accused of misconduct by an employer?

3. Do any of you rely on a tax professional to keep your books or prepare

your tax returns? Have you ever had a problem with a tax professional that caused

you concern? 

4. Does anyone own a boat or have you owned one in the past? Has

anyone ever done business with Gene’s Marine in Clanton, Montgomery or any of

the previous locations? Do you know of anyone who has done business with

Case 2:06-cr-00202-WKW-CSC Document 58 Filed 12/27/2006 Page 1 of 3
Gene’s Marine or the Clecklers? Does anyone own a boat or trailer manufactured

by Ezy-Ryder?

5. Has anyone ever been audited or investigated by the IRS? Has anyone

ever been accused of making a mistake on a tax form or other government form? 

Does anyone feel that the IRS or the government could make a mistake?

6. Does anyone feel that an indictment is an indication of guilt? Does

anyone believe that because the Clecklers are on trial, they must be guilty of

something?

7. Does anyone have any reservations whatsoever, for or against either

party, that would keep you from being fair, without prejudice or bias, in your

judgment of this case? 

Respectfully submitted, this the 27 day of December, 2006. th

s/ Ronald R. Brunson 

RONALD R. BRUNSON 1696

ATTORNEY FOR EUGENE L. CLECKLER

2126 Morris Avenue

Birmingham, Alabama 35203

(205) 252-2100

Case 2:06-cr-00202-WKW-CSC Document 58 Filed 12/27/2006 Page 2 of 3
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on December 27th, 2006, I electronically filed the

foregoing with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system, which will send

notification of such filing to the following:

Andrew O. Schiff, Esq., Assistant U.S. Attorney

201 One Court Square

Post Office Box 197

Montgomery, AL 36101-0197

Andrew.schiff@usdoj.gov, Debbie.shaw@usdoj.gov

George L. Beck, Jr., Esq.

Terrie S. Biggs, Esq.

CAPELL & HOWARD, P.C.

150 South Perry Street

Post Office Box 2069

Montgomery, Alabama 36102-2069

glb@chlaw.com tsb@chlaw.com 

s/ Ronald R. Brunson 

 RONALD R. BRUNSON

Case 2:06-cr-00202-WKW-CSC Document 58 Filed 12/27/2006 Page 3 of 3
§ 1002.31 Unauthorized uses of the seal and flag. The official seal and distinguishing flag shall not be used except as authorized by the Director of Administration in connection with: ( a ) Contractor-operated facilities.
( b ) Souvenir or novelty items.
( c ) Toys or commercial gifts or premiums.
( d ) Letterhead design, except on official Departmental stationery.
( e ) Matchbook covers, calendars, and similar items.
( f ) Civilian clothing or equipment.
( g ) Any article which may disparage the seal or flag or reflect unfavorably upon DOE.
( h ) Any manner which implies Departmental endorsement of commercial products or services, or of the user's policies or activities.
#### § 171.25 Collection, interest, penalties, and administrative costs.

All annual fees in §§ 171.15 and 171.16 will be collected pursuant to the procedures of 10 CFR part 15. Interest, penalties and administrative costs for late payments will be assessed in accordance with 10 CFR part 15, of this chapter, 4 CFR part 102, and other relevant regulations of the United States Government, as appropriate. In the event a quarterly installment is not made by the appropriate due date specified in § 171.19, the full fee becomes due and payable, with interest, penalties, and administrative costs of collection calculated from the date that quarterly installment was due.

[56 FR 31511, July 10, 1991]
#### § 215.6 Notice of negotiations.

Any person conducting negotiations with a host government which may reasonably lead to the establishment of any supply arrangement subject to reporting pursuant to § 215.3(a), or may reasonably have a significant effect on the terms and conditions of an arrangement subject to § 215.3(a), shall notify DOE of such negotiations. Such notice shall be made no later than the later of 30 days after the effective date of this regulation or within 14 days after such negotiations meet the conditions of this section, and shall specify all persons involved and the host government affected. Notice must be in writing to the Assistant Administrator for International Energy Affairs. Where this notice pertains to negotiations to modify a supply agreement previously reported to the Department of Energy under this part, such notice shall include the agreement serial number assigned to the basic agreement.
Case 2:06-cr-00209-MHT-CSC Document 40 Filed 02/08/2007 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:06-cr-00209-MHT-CSC Document 40 Filed 02/08/2007 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:06-cr-00209-MHT-CSC Document 40 Filed 02/08/2007 Page 3 of 3
PGI PART 16 – TYPES OF CONTRACTS

PGI SUBPART 16.5 – INDEFINITE-DELIVERY CONTRACTS

PGI 16.504 Indefinite-quantity contracts.

PGI SUBPART 16.5 – INDEFINITE-DELIVERY CONTRACTS

(Revised January 11, 2022 through PROCLTR 2021-15)

PGI 16.504 Indefinite-quantity contracts.

(a)(1)(S-90) Establishing guaranteed minimum quantities and recording obligations.

(B) Monthly review and reporting. Procuring organizations shall access Guaranteed Minimum

(https://dlamil.dps.mil/sites/Acquisition/Shared%20Documents/Forms/AllItems.aspx?viewid=e9b411

26%2Dd28f%2D4f87%2Da9f7%2Dddf914a82406&id=%2Fsites%2FAcquisition%2FShared%20Docu

ments%2FGuaranteed%20Minimum); and

(i) Use instructions to query guaranteed minimums in ECC and SRM; and

(ii) Complete the Procuring Org Monthly Reporting Template and submit to the DLA Acquisition

Procurement Process & Systems Division on a monthly basis (by the 10th of the month for the

preceding month).
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES 

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) 

 ) 

 Plaintiff, ) 

 ) 

 v. ) Case No. 1:06-cr-0201-WHA-CSC 

 ) 

OSCAR MARTINEZ-RAMIREZ, ) 

 ) 

 Defendant. ) 

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE 

COMES NOW, Richard K. Keith, and hereby gives his Notice of Appearance as 

Court-Appointed Counsel representing Oscar Martinez-Ramirez in the above-styled 

cause. 

Respectfully submitted this 13th day of February, 2007. 

s/ Richard K. Keith 

RICHARD K. KEITH (KEI003)

Attorney for Defendant

KEITH & DUBIN, P.C.

22 Scott Street 

Montgomery, AL 36104-4012 

Telephone: (334) 264-6776 

Facsimile: (334) 265-5362 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on February 13, 2007, I electronically filed the foregoing with 

the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system, which will send notification of such 

filing to the following: 

A. Clark Morris, AUSA 

Post Office Box 197 

Montgomery, AL 36101-0197 

s/ Richard K. Keith 

OF COUNSEL

Case 1:06-cr-00201-WHA-CSC Document 42 Filed 02/13/2007 Page 1 of 1
# SUBCHAPTER C - CONTRACTING METHODS AND CONTRACT TYPES

- PART 2114 - SEALED BIDDING 
- PART 2115 - CONTRACTING BY NEGOTIATION 
- PART 2116 - TYPES OF CONTRACTS 

- PART 2114 - SEALED BIDDING    - Subpart 2114.70 - Applicability     - 2114.7001   Applicability.
- PART 2115 - CONTRACTING BY NEGOTIATION    - 2115.070   Negotiation authority.
  - 2115.071   Specific retention periods: Contract clause.
  - Subpart 2115.1 - Source Selection Processes and Techniques     - 2115.170   Applicability.
  - Subpart 2115.2 - Solicitation and Receipt of Proposals and Quotations     - 2115.270   Applicability.
  - Subpart 2115.3 - Source Selection     - 2115.370   Applicability.
  - Subpart 2115.4 - Contract Pricing     - 2115.402   Policy.
    - 2115.404-70   Profit.
    - 2115.404-71   Profit analysis factors.
- PART 2116 - TYPES OF CONTRACTS    - Subpart 2116.1 - Selecting Contract Types     - 2116.105   Solicitation provision.
  - Subpart 2116.2 - Fixed-Price Contracts     - 2116.270   FEGLI Program contracts.
    - 2116.270-1   Contract clauses.
159 So.2d 288

#### ARKANSAS LOUISIANA GAS COMPANY v. J. C. TRAHAN et al.

No. 47052.

Jan. 20, 1964.

In re: W. P. Leonard, Jr., et al. applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, Parish of Bossier. 158 So.2d 456.

Writ denied. No error of law under the facts found by the Court of Appeal.
United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

November 13, 2014

ERRATA

______________________ 

Appeal No. 2013-7124

JOAN C. DEBORD

v.

ROBERT A. MCDONALD,

Secretary of Veterans Affairs

Decided: November 12, 2014

Nonprecedential Opinion

______________________ 

Please make the following change:

Page 2, line 13, add --PER CURIAM (DYK, WALLACH, and

HUGHES, Circuit Judges).--
EXHIBIT 31.3



CERTIFICATIONS



I, Michael Szymanski, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A of ZAIS Group Holdings, Inc.; and
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: April 29, 2016



| | By:    | /s/ Michael Szymanski                
| | ------ | -------------------------------------
| | Name:  | Michael Szymanski                    
| | Title: | Chief Executive Officer and President
#### § 966.11 Pack.

*Pack* means any of the packs of tomatoes as defined and set forth in the United States Standards for Fresh Tomatoes issued by the United States Department of Agriculture (§§ 51.1855 to 51.1877 of this title), or any pack of tomatoes recommended by the committee and approved by the Secretary.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CASE NO. 2:06-cv-0736-WKW

)

SEVENTY FOUR THOUSAND SEVEN )

HUNDRED ($74,700) DOLLARS IN )

UNITED STATES CURRENCY, )

)

Defendant. )

ORDER

On the basis of the representations of the parties in their Joint Motion for Trial Upon

Submitted Evidence and Briefs (Doc. # 35), it is ORDERED that the trial of this case is

continued generally, with the case being submitted on the transcript of the motion to suppress

hearing held September 6, 2007, and documentary evidence introduced therein, the

stipulation of the parties to be filed on or before October 19, 2007, and final trial briefs to

be filed by the parties on or before October 29, 2007.

Furthermore, as there will be no further testimony, it is hereby ORDERED that the

Government’s Motion in Limine (Doc. # 32) seeking to bar the testimony of the claimant is

DENIED as MOOT. 

DONE this 12th day of October, 2007.

 /s/ W. Keith Watkins 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00736-WKW-SRW Document 36 Filed 10/12/2007 Page 1 of 1
### SERVICE BULLETIN

N° SB 104

– CS

Edition 2, Rev

. 1

The technical content of this doc ument is approved under the authority of DOA. EASA.21J.335

Approval No. DO

- 104

- 280313

28 th March 2013

P age 1 / 2

Edition 2 Rev

. 1 INFORMATION  RECOMMENDED  MANDATORY 

SUBJECT : P2006T NLG upper link mandatory replacement : this SB

supersedes the SB 104, Edition 1, revision 1.

SCOPE : Tecnam informs customers that a new Nose Landing Gear

( NLG ) upper link assy (P/N 26

- 8

- 8 0 00

- 000 ) is available.

The new assy is equipped with an improved NLG mechan ical locking device which makes easier the NLG maint enance tasks and , in particular, the locking system adjus tment

. The necessary parts are provided by two different kits.

In orde r to put P2006T fleet in the same configuration, with

the awareness that the design improvement is very effe c tive

for the above mentioned scope, Tecnam prescribes to e mbody the pr e sent SB.

The required hardware will be provided FREE of CHARGE

to the custom ers , only if requested within 90 days from this

SB issue date with the mandatory return of the removed old

assy ; the manpower required and shipment costs won’t be

refunded.

After that period, Tecnam will not assure any warranty issue

in connection with t he old assy.

Customers who already bought the parts have to get in co ntact with Tecnam Spare Parts Manager, Mr. Luciano Russo

( l.russo@tecnam.com ): a note of credit will be issued.

Furthermore Tecnam informs custo mers that old upper link

assy p/n production ceased: for future upper link assy r eplacement, the new p/n will be provided.

MODELS AFFECTED : All P2006T s/n have to install both kit

. P2006T s/n that have already installed kit SB104

- CS has to

insta ll only the kit SB104

- CS/2.

TIME OF COMPLIANCE : At Customer’s choice

MANPOWER : 4 man

- hours for kit n° SB104

- CS

2 man

- hours for kit n° SB104

- CS/2

### SERVICE BULLETIN

N° SB 104

– CS

Edition 2, Rev

. 1

The technical content of this doc ument is approved under the authority of DOA. EASA.21J.335

Approval No. DO

- 104

- 280313

28 th March 2013

P age 2 / 2

Edition 2 Rev

. 1 REQUIRED MATERIAL :  KIT n° SB 104

- CS (includ ing job card n o. 442 , pr oviding instructions for NLG upper link replacement )

, if not yet installed (SB104 previous issue), and SB

109 (and related Kit) if not embodied yet

.

 KIT n° SB104

- CS/2 (including job card no. 528, pr oviding instruction for NLG upper link u p grade).

TOOLING : Nil

WEIGHT AND BALAN CE : N il

REFERENCES : Nil

PUB

. AFFECTED : “P2006T Aircraft Maintenance Manual” doc. n° 2006

- 45

–

last issue ;

“P2006T Aircraft Parts Catalogue” doc. n° 2006

- 46

– last

issue ;

For further information please contact TECNAM:

Tel 0039 08 23 620134

Fax 0039 0823 62 28 99

E

- mail airworthiness@tecnam.com or l.russo@tecnam.com
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Reuben Avent, Appellant.

Submitted August 13, 2007;

decided September 6, 2007

Reported below, 29 AD3d 601.

Motion for an extension of the time within which to apply for permission to appeal pursuant to CPL 460.20 granted and motion papers treated as a timely CPL 460.20 application.