alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION

J.B., a minor child, by and )

through his next friend, )

Addie Ward, on behalf of )

himself and all others )

similarly situated, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

v. ) 2:06cv755-MHT

) 

WALTER WOOD, in his )

individual capacity, )

)

Defendant. )

J.B., a minor child, by and )

through his next friend, )

Addie Ward, on behalf of )

himself and all others )

similarly situated, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

v. ) 2:06cv908-MHT

) 

WALTER WOOD, in his )

individual capacity, )

)

Defendant. )

Case 2:06-cv-00755-MHT-CSC Document 80 Filed 11/30/2007 Page 1 of 2
ORDER

It is ORDERED that the motion to strike and

alternative motion for leave to respond (Doc. No. 79) are

set for submission, without oral argument, on December

14, 2007, with all briefs due by said date. 

DONE, this the 30th day of November, 2007.

 /s/ Myron H. Thompson 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00755-MHT-CSC Document 80 Filed 11/30/2007 Page 2 of 2
52.222-7 Withholding of Funds.

As prescribed in 22.407(a), insert the following clause:

Withholding of Funds (May 2014)

The Contracting Officer shall, upon his or her own action or upon written request of an authorized

representative of the Department of Labor, withhold or cause to be withheld from the Contractor

under this contract or any other Federal contract with the same Prime Contractor, or any other

federally assisted contract subject to prevailing wage requirements, which is held by the same Prime

Contractor, so much of the accrued payments or advances as may be considered necessary to pay

laborers and mechanics, including apprentices, trainees, and helpers, employed by the Contractor or

any subcontractor the full amount of wages required by the contract. In the event of failure to pay

any laborer or mechanic, including any apprentice, trainee, or helper, employed or working on the

site of the work, all or part of the wages required by the contract, the Contracting Officer may, after

written notice to the Contractor, take such action as may be necessary to cause the suspension of

any further payment, advance, or guarantee of funds until such violations have ceased.

(End of clause)

Parent topic: 52.222 [Reserved]
Exhibit
      35(b)










VIA:
      EMAIL





Bond
      Securitization, L.L.C.


1
      Bank
      One Plaza


Chicago,
      Illinois 60670





Litton
      Loan Servicing LP


4828
      Loop
      Central Drive


Houston,
      Texas 77081





Re:
      C-BASS Trust 2006-CB7 (the "Trust"), C-BASS Mortgage Loan Asset-Backed
      Certificates, Series 2006-CB7, issued pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing
      Agreement, dated as September 1, 2006 (the "Agreement"), among Bond
      Securitization, L.L.C, as depositor (the "Depositor"), Litton Loan Servicing
      LP,
      as servicer (the "Servicer"), Credit-Based Asset Servicing and Securitization
      LLC, as seller (the "Seller"), and LaSalle Bank National Association, as trustee
      (the "Trustee")





I,
      Barbara L. Marik, a First Vice President of LaSalle Bank National Association,
      as Trustee hereby certify that:





(1)
      A
      review of the activities of the Trustee during the preceding calendar year
      and
      of the performance of the Trustee under the Agreement has been made under my
      supervision; and





(2)
      To
      the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Trustee has fulfilled all
      its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout such
      year or a portion thereof.







Date: February
      1, 2007





LaSalle
      Bank National Association, as Trustee




/s/
      Barbara L Marik


Barbara
      L. Marik


First
      Vice President
###### Editorial Note on Part 34

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 34 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

#### § 34.51 Surveillance.

During each radiographic operation the radiographer, or the other individual present, as required by § 34.41, shall maintain continuous direct visual surveillance of the operation to protect against unauthorized entry into a high radiation area, as defined in 10 CFR part 20 of this chapter, except at permanent radiographic installations where all entryways are locked and the requirements of § 34.33 are met.
2807.104-70 Bundled requirements.       In the case of bundled requirements, as defined in FAR 7.104(d)(2) and 7.107, the contracting officer shall consult with the bureau Small Business Technical Advisor (SBTA). After receiving concurrence from the bureau SBTA, the contracting officer will provide a copy of the proposed acquisition package to the Small Business Administration (SBA) Procurement Center Representative (PCR) and a copy to the DOJ Director, Office of Small Disadvantaged Business Unit (OSDBU), at least 30 days prior to the solicitation issuance. The SBA PCR is required to make any alternative recommendations to the contracting officer within 15 days after receipt of the package. If the SBA does not respond in this timeframe, the contracting officer may proceed as planned with the procurement.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 2807.1 - Acquisition Plans
§ 1050.104 Responsibilities and authorities. ( a ) The Director of Administration shall: ( 1 ) Assure that all employees are given access to or a copy of the Act and these regulations;
( 2 ) Maintain liaison with the Department of State and prepare Departmental reports to the Department of State consistent with the Act and these regulations;
( 3 ) Provide advice and assistance on implementation of the act and these regulations, in coordination with the Assistant Secretary for International Affairs (IA) and the appropriate General Counsel;
( 4 ) Collect and maintain for public inspection all employee statements submitted pursuant to these regulations;
( 5 ) Arrange for independent appraisal of the value of gifts or decorations, upon the request of the General Services Administration or the Inspector General (or other appropriate DOE official); and
( 6 ) Accept and maintain custody and make all determinations regarding the use and disposition of all gifts and decorations accepted by employees on behalf of the United States, in coordination with IA, the appropriate General Counsel, and, for gifts to the Secretary, Deputy Secretary or Under Secretary, the appropriate official in the Office of the Secretary.
( b ) The Assistant Secretary for International Affairs (IA) shall assist the Directorate of Administration, where appropriate, in making determinations concerning the effects of the proposed acceptance, use, or disposition of a foreign gift or decoration on the foreign relations of the United States.
( c ) The appropriate General Counsel shall assist the Directorate of Administration in matters relating to the interpretation and application of the Act, and these and any related regulations, and shall provide counseling and interpretation regarding the Act, and these and any related regulations, to employees.
( d ) The Inspector General shall investigate suspected violations of these regulations pursuant to § 1050.303 below.
EXHIBIT 34.2

LOGO

To the Board of Directors

TransCentra, Inc.

We have examined managements assertion for those customers that
management has informed us have requested confirmation of compliance, included in the accompanying Managements Report on Assessment of Compliance with Regulation AB Servicing Criteria (Managements Assertion), that TransCentra, Inc. (the
Company) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d)(2)(i) and Item 1122 (d)(4)(iv) of the Securities and Exchange Commissions (SEC) Regulation AB for services by the Company that are encompassed by
contractual obligations to perform Regulation AB reporting (the Platform) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016. TransCentra has determined that the remainder of the servicing criteria are not applicable to the activities it
performs with respect to the Platform covered by this report. Management is responsible for the Companys compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on managements assertion about the
Companys compliance with the applicable servicing criteria based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with
attestation standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the
Companys compliance with the applicable servicing criteria, including tests on a sample basis of the servicing activities related to the Platform, determining whether the Company performed those activities in compliance with the servicing
criteria during the specified period and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our procedures were limited to selected servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report
and, accordingly, such samples may not have included servicing activities related to each asset-backed transaction in the Platform. Further, an examination is not designed to detect noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurred prior to
the period specified above that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination
does not provide a legal determination on the Companys compliance with the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, managements
assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016, is fairly stated, in all material respects.

/s/ Porter Keadle Moore, LLC

February 1, 2017

235 Peachtree Street NE | Suite 1800 | Atlanta, Georgia 30303 | Phone 404.588.4200 | Fax 404.588.4222

A member of Allinial Global
[879 NE2d 158, 849 NYS2d 19]

#### In the Matter of 333 East 49th Associates, LP, et al., Appellants, v New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal, Office of Rent Administration, Respondent.

Decided November 27, 2007

*983APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL

*Shaw and Binder,*New York City *(Robert H. Gordon*of counsel), for appellants.

*Gary R. Connor,*New York City, and *Jeffrey G. Kelly*for respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

A rational basis exists for the Division of Housing and Community Renewal’s determination that petitioners failed to maintain adequate janitorial services warranting a rent reduction *(see Matter of Gilman v New York State Div. of Hous. & Community Renewal,*99 NY2d 144, 149 [2002]). The determination, implicitly rejecting petitioners’ claim that the violation was de minimis, is rationally based on the inspector’s observations of debris in the compactor rooms, which confirmed the tenants’ sworn complaint of filthy compactor rooms that were not maintained. DHCR’s determination that petitioners reduced services by failing to maintain the compactor rooms was not irrational and must be sustained *(see Matter of KSLM-Columbus Apts., Inc. v New York State Div. of Hous. & Community Re*
      *984
      *newal,*5 NY3d 303, 312 [2005]; *Matter of Mid-State Mgt. Corp. v New York City Conciliation & Appeals Bd.,*112 AD2d 72, 75-76 [1st Dept 1985], *affd*66 NY2d 1032 [1985]).

Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo and Jones concur; Judges Read, Smith and Pigott dissent and vote to reverse for the reasons stated in the dissenting memorandum by Justice George D. Marlow at the Appellate Division (40 AD3d 516, 517-520 [2007]).

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.
Editorial Note on Part 1
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 1 appear at 78 FR 34247, June 7, 2013.

§ 1.36 Office of Investigations. The Office of Investigations (OI)— ( a ) Conducts investigations of licensees, applicants, their contractors or vendors, including the investigation of all allegations of wrongdoing by other than NRC employees and contractors;
( b ) Maintains current awareness of inquiries and inspections by other NRC offices to identify the need for formal investigations;
( c ) Makes appropriate referrals to the Department of Justice;
( d ) Maintains liaison with other agencies and organizations to ensure the timely exchange of information of mutual interest; and
( e ) Issues subpoenas where necessary or appropriate for the conduct of investigations.
[54 FR 53315, Dec. 28, 1989]
**Exhibit32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

** **

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of MAI SystemsCorporation (the Company) for the period ended September 30, 2004 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,James D. Dolan, Chief Financial and Operating Officer of the Company, certifypursuant to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that :

 

1.               The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2.               The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   | Date:  November 18, 2004 |                                  |
|--------|-------------------------------|---------------------------------------|
|   | By:                           | /s/  James W. Dolan                   |
|   |                          | James W. Dolan                        |
|   |                          | Chief Financial and Operating Officer |

 

1

----
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

 FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

EASTERN DIVISION

In the Matter of the Extradition of 

 
 )

MARIA del ROSARIO MORENO-VAZQUEZ ) 3:06-CV-761-MEF-CSC

a/k/a MARIA COONLEY
 
 
 )

OBJECTIONS TO NOTICE BY UNITED STATES OF AMERICA OF FILING COLOR 

COPIES OF ORIGINAL FORMAL EXTRADITION PAPERS

COMES NOW the respondent in this cause and objects to any substitution of 

documents in the extradition package obtained from the Mexican government since it 

was filed. The government attorney is correct that we do not object to any materials 

contained in the extradition packages, however, to one day before the hearing and 

represent that they obtained copies from the government of Mexico of documents which 

were unreadable and now we can read them is in violation of the treaty as the United 

States Department of State has not certified such documents in accord with the protocol 

established for this as well as a violation of any known evidentiary basis for 

authenticating documents. We would not object to better copies being made from the 

original extradition package in the possession of the court.















 
 
 
 
 
 Respectfully submitted,







 ____________//s/Ben Bruner___________


 
 
 
 
 
 Ben Bruner
 


Attorney at Law

505 S. Perry Street

Montgomery, Alabama 36104

(334) 323 4463

Case 3:06-cv-00761-CSC Document 34 Filed 06/10/2008 Page 1 of 2
 Certificate of Service

 I hereby certify that on June 6, 2008, I electronically filed the foregoing with the

Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system, which will send notification of such filing

to the following: Christopher Snyder Assistant U.S. Attorney






 /s/ Ben Bruner


 
 
 
 
 Ben Bruner
 



 
 
 
 Attorney at Law


 
 
 
 505 S. Perry Street


 
 
 
 Montgomery, Alabama 36104


 
 
 
 (334) 323 4463









Case 3:06-cv-00761-CSC Document 34 Filed 06/10/2008 Page 2 of 2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

      ( print page 79065)    
Notice is hereby given that Emergence Capital Partners SBIC, L.P., 160 Bovet Road, Suite 300, San Mateo, CA 94402, a Federal Licensee under the Small Business Investment Act of 1958, as amended (“the Act”), in connection with the financing of a small concern, has sought an exemption under Section 312 of the Act and Section 107.730, Financings which Constitute Conflicts of Interest of the Small Business Administration (“SBA”) Rules and Regulations (13 CFR 107.730). Emergence Capital Partners SBIC, L.P. proposes to provide equity financing to Intacct Corporation, 125 S. Market Street, Suite 600, San Jose, California 95113. The financing is contemplated for working capital and general operating purposes.

The financing is brought within the purview of § 107.730(a)(1) of the Regulations because Emergence Capital Partners, L.P. and Emergence Capital Associates, L.P., Associates of Emergence Capital Partners SBIC, L.P., own more than ten percent of Intacct Corporation. Therefore, Intacct Corporation is considered an Associate of Emergence Capital Partners SBIC, L.P. and this transaction is considered Financing an Associate, requiring prior SBA approval.

Notice is hereby given that any interested person may submit written comments on the transaction within 15 days of the date of this publication to the Associate Administrator for Investment, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 Third Street, SW., Washington, DC 20416.

Dated: December 3, 2010.

Sean J. Greene,

Associate Administrator for Investment.

[FR Doc. 2010-31675 Filed 12-16-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8025-01-M
#### BRUNO v. LINCH.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

July 10, 1914.)

Action by Carmelo Bruno against George W. Linch, as receiver, etc.

No opinion. Motion denied, with $10 costs. Order filed. See, also, 147 N. Y. Supp. 1101.
PGI SUBPART 23.90 – ENSURING ADEQUATE

COVID-19 SAFETY PROTOCOLS FOR

FEDERAL CONTRACTORS

Parent topic: PGI PART 23 – ENVIRONMENT, ENERGY AND WATER EFFICIENCY, RENEWABLE

ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES, OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY, AND DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE

PGI 23.9001 General.

(c) See Vaccination Deviation Flow Chart

(https://dlamil.dps.mil/sites/Acquisition/Shared%20Documents/J-72/Vaccination%20Deviation%20Flo

w%20Chart_Updated_29OCT2021.pdf) on the Acquisition SharePoint Page. The flow chart includes

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs).
###### Editorial Note on Part 782

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 782 appear at 61 FR 32643, June 25, 1996.

#### § 782.2 Definitions.

As used in this part and in all instructions, forms, and documents in connection therewith, the words and phrases defined in this section shall have the meanings herein assigned to them unless the context or subject matter requires otherwise. References contained herein to other parts of this chapter or title shall be construed as references to such parts and amendments now in effect or later issued.

*Date of entry* means the effective time of entry of the merchandise, as defined in 19 CFR part 101.

*End Use* means the actual manner in which Canadian-produced wheat was used, including, among other uses, milling, brewing, malting, distilling, manufacturing, or export.

*End user* means the entity that uses Canadian-produced wheat for, among other uses, milling, brewing, malting, distilling, manufacturing, or other use, except resale.

*Entity* means a legal entity including, but not limited to, an individual, joint stock company, corporation, association, partnership, cooperative, trust, and estate.

*Entry* means that documentation required by 19 CFR part 142 to be filed with the appropriate U.S. Customs officer to secure the release of imported merchandise from U.S. Customs custody, or the act of filing that documentation.

*Grain handler* means an entity other than the importer, exporter, subsequent buyer, or end user that handles wheat on behalf of an importer, exporter, subsequent buyer, or end user.

*Importer* means a party qualifying as an Importer of Record pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1484(a).

*Metric ton* means a unit of measure that equals 2,204.6 pounds.

*Subsequent buyer* means an entity other than the end user or importer which owns wheat originating in Canada.

*Workdays* means days that the Federal government normally conducts business, which excludes Saturdays, Sundays, and Federal holidays.

[60 FR 5089, Jan. 26, 1995, as amended at 61 FR 32643, June 25, 1996; 64 FR 12885, Mar. 16, 1999]
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

 )

 v. ) CR. NO. 2:06-cr-206-MHT

)

ALETHIA ADRIANNE SCOTT )

 )

United States’s Motion for Downward Departure for Substantial Assistance

The United States moves this Court to reduce defendant Alethia Adrianne Scott’s

offense level by one-level based on Scott’s substantial assistance in this case. As grounds

for this Motion, the United States notes:

1. Scott has cooperated with the United States. During her cooperation, Scott

informed the United States of additional fraud in which she and her co-defendant Kevin

Brown participated. Based upon Scott’s information and subsequent investigation, the

United States superseded Brown’s indictment. Scott also agreed to testify against Brown.

While Brown has not yet pleaded guilty, the United States believes that a plea agreement

with Brown is imminent and that Scott’s cooperation and willingness to testify has been a

factor in Brown’s willingness to plead guilty. 

2. The United States submits that to the best of its knowledge Scott has been

truthful with federal investigators. As part of the plea agreement, Scott has waived her right

to appeal and/or collaterally attack the sentence imposed in this case. Therefore, United

States asks this Court to depart one-level under Guideline § 5K1.1 based upon Scott’s

Case 2:06-cr-00206-MHT-CSC Document 63 Filed 02/13/2007 Page 1 of 2
-2-

substantial assistance. 

Respectfully submitted this the 13th day of February, 2006.

LEURA G. CANARY

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

/s/ Christopher Snyder 

CHRISTOPHER A. SNYDER

Assistant United States Attorney

One Court Square, Suite 201

Montgomery, AL 36104

Phone: (334) 223-7280

Fax: (334) 223-7135

E-mail: christopher.a.snyder@usdoj.gov 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on February 13, 2006, I electronically filed the foregoing with

the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system, which will send notification of such

filing to Kevin Butler.

/s/ Christopher Snyder 

CHRISTOPHER A. SNYDER

Assistant United States Attorney

Case 2:06-cr-00206-MHT-CSC Document 63 Filed 02/13/2007 Page 2 of 2