alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                       4,478,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,505,000
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 133,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,505,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,504,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    12,737,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 (9,736,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,505,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,203,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  279,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               200,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,998,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,274,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,274,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               (12,000)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,286,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.46)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.46)
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 FORM 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           3,861
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                   200
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     30,483
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           7,596
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             7,689
<LOANS>                                         86,944
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,050
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 131,444
<DEPOSITS>                                     109,507
<SHORT-TERM>                                       707
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                771
<LONG-TERM>                                      4,392
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            1,500
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      14,567
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 131,444
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  6,050
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,562
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    64
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 7,676
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               2,812
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,965
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            4,711
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      144
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                  10
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  3,081
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,908
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       1,908
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,217
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.78
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.78
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    5.20
<LOANS-NON>                                         38
<LOANS-PAST>                                        48
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   990
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      106
<RECOVERIES>                                        22
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,050
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,050
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            100
        

</TABLE>
SUBCHAPTER F - SPECIAL CATEGORIES OF

CONTRACTING

PART 2834 - MAJOR SYSTEM ACQUISITION

PART 2836 - CONSTRUCTION AND ARCHITECT-ENGINEER CONTRACTS

PART 2837 - SERVICE CONTRACTING

PART 2839 - ACQUISITION OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY

PART 2841 - ACQUISITION OF UTILITY SERVICES

PART 2834 - MAJOR SYSTEM ACQUISITION

Subpart 2834.0 - General

2834.002 Policy.

2834.003 Responsibilities.

2834.005 General requirements.

2834.005-6 Full production.

PART 2836 - CONSTRUCTION AND ARCHITECT-ENGINEER CONTRACTS

Subpart 2836.2 - Special Aspects of Contracting for Construction

2836.204 Disclosure in solicitations of the magnitude of construction projects.

Subpart 2836.6 - Architect-Engineer Services

2836.602 Selection of firms for architect-engineer contracts.

2836.602-1 Selection criteria.

2836.602-4 Selection authority.

2836.602-5 Short selection process for contracts not to exceed the simplified

acquisition threshold.

PART 2837 - SERVICE CONTRACTING

Subpart 2837.1 - Service Contracts - General

2837.106 Funding and term of service contracts.

Subpart 2837.2 - Advisory and Assistance Services

2837.204 Guidelines for determining availability of personnel.

Subpart 2837.5 - Management Oversight of Service Contracts

2837.503 Agency-head responsibilities.

PART 2839 - ACQUISITION OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY

Subpart 2839.1 - General

2839.101 Policy.

2839.102 Management of risk.

PART 2841 - ACQUISITION OF UTILITY SERVICES

Subpart 2841.2 - Acquiring Utility Services

2841.201 Policy.
#### § 205.326 Filing procedures and fees.

Applications shall be forwarded to the Office of Utility Systems of the Economic Regulatory Administration and shall be accompanied by a filing fee of $150. The application fee will be charged irrespective of the ERA's disposition of the application. Fee payment shall be by check, draft, or money order payable to the Treasurer of the United States. Copies of applications shall be furnished to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission and all affected State public utility regulatory agencies.
§ 1003.10 Public reference room. The OHA maintains an electronic public reference room at *https://www.energy.gov/oha/decision-summaries .* The following information is included: ( a ) A list of all persons who have filed a petition and a digest of each petition;
( b ) Each Decision and Order, with confidential information deleted, issued in response to a petition; and
( c ) Any other information in the possession of the OHA which is required by statute to be made available for public inspection and copying, and any other information that the OHA determines should be made available to the public.
§ 906.30 Powers. The committee shall have the following powers: ( a ) To administer the provisions of this part in accordance with its terms;
( b ) To make rules and regulations to effectuate the terms and provisions of this part;
( c ) To receive, investigate, and report to the Secretary complaints of violation of the provisions of this part; and
( d ) To recommend to the Secretary amendments to this part.
Exhibit 32.1



Citizens Financial Corp.



Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley

Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350



I,
Robert J. Schoonover, President and Chief Executive Officer of Citizens Financial Corp. (the company) certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 that:



|1. | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the company for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|              |  |                         
|------------- |  | ------------------------
|Date: 8/12/04 |  | /s/ Robert J. Schoonover
|              |  | Robert J. Schoonover    
|              |  | President               
|              |  | Chief Executive Officer
1511.011-79 Information resources

management.

The Contracting Officer shall insert the clause at 1552.211-79, Compliance with EPA Policies for

Information Resource Management, in all solicitations and contracts.

Parent topic: PART 1511 - DESCRIBING AGENCY NEEDS
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR

THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

ALMA T. MCBROOM, )

 )

Plaintiff, )

 )

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:06cv767-MEF

)

JOHN E. POTTER, POSTMASTER )

GENERAL, et al., )

 )

Defendants. )

ORDER

It is hereby ORDERED that the above-referenced case be set for a scheduling

conference on January 9, 2007 at 8:30 a.m. in courtroom 5-B, Frank M. Johnson, Jr. United

States Courthouse Complex, One Church Street, Montgomery, Alabama.

DONE, this 20th day of December, 2006.

/s/ Susan Russ Walker 

SUSAN RUSS WALKER

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00767-MEF-SRW Document 31 Filed 12/20/2006 Page 1 of 1
§ 1005.1 What is the purpose of these regulations? ( a ) The regulations in this part implement Executive Order 12372, “Intergovernmental Review of Federal Programs,” issued July 14, 1982 and amended on April 8, 1983. These regulations also implement applicable provisions of section 401 of the Intergovernmental Cooperation Act of 1968.
( b ) These regulations are intended to foster an intergovernmental partership and a strengthened Federalism by relying on state processes and on state, areawide, regional and local coordination for review of proposed federal financial assistance and direct federal development.
( c ) These regulations are intended to aid the internal management of the Department, and are not intended to create any right or benefit enforceable at law by a party against the Department or its officers.
STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS WHITNEY LOSTON NO. 

### 2023 KW 0905


### DECEMBER 4, 

### 2023

In Re: 

### Whitney Loston, 

### applying for supervisory writs, 

### 16th Judicial District Court, Parish of St. 

### Mary, Nos. 

### 2009-181129/03-162554.

BEFORE: McCLENDON, HESTER, AND MILLER, JJ.



### WRIT DENIED ON THE SHOWING MADE. 

### Relator failed to include the 

### resentencing minute entries and/or the transcript, his bill of 

### information, the uniform commitment order, 

### any pertinent minute entries, and other portions of the district court record that might support the claims raised 

### in the writ application. Supplementation of this writ application and/or an application for 

### rehearing will not 

### be considered. See Uniform Rules of Louisiana Courts of Appeal, Rules 

### 2-18.7 & 

### 4-9. 

### Any future 

## filing on this issue should include the entire contents of this application, 

### the missing items noted above, and a copy of this ruling.

It 

### is noted that as an indigent inmate, relator is entitled to receive certain court documents, such as the 

### guilty plea transcript, the 

### bill of 

### information or 

### indictment, the commitment papers, the court minutes 

### for various portions of the trial, 

## andtheminutesofhis sentencing, free of charge without 

### the necessity of establishing a particularized need. See State ex rel. Simmons v. State, 

### 93-0275 ( La. 

### 12/16/94), 647 

### So.2d 1094, 1095 ( per curiam). 

### As to all other documents, an indigent 

## inmatehastheconstitutional righttofreecopiesonlyinthose instances in which 

### he shows that denial of the request will 

### deprive him of an adequate 

### opportunity to present 

### his claims 

## fairly. Meeting that constitutional threshold requires a 

### showing of a particularized need. An 

### inmate therefore cannot make a 

### showing of particularized need absent a 

### properly 

### filed application for postconviction relief, which sets out specific claims of constitutional errors requiring the requested 

### documentation for support. See State ex rel. Bernard v. Criminal District Court Section " J", 94-2247 ( La. 

### 4/28/95), 653 

### So.2d 1174, 1175 ( per curiam). PMC CHH SMM


### OURT OFAPPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

PUTY CLERK OF COURT i FOR THE COURT
#### Bonita M. Mincer, Appellant, v James A. Mincer, Respondent.

Order unanimously modified, and, as modified, affirmed, without costs, in accordance with the following memorandum: Pending plaintiff wife’s motion in this matrimonial action to strike paragraph "twelfth” of defendant’s answer and counterclaim, defendant husband served an amended pleading deleting the objectionable allegations and cross-moved to strike the case from the calendar because of the incorrectness of material facts set forth in the certificate of readiness filed by plaintiff, and for counsel fees pursuant to section 237 of the Domestic Relations Law. Plaintiff appeals from an order of Special Term which denied her motion to strike paragraph "twelfth” and to dismiss defendant’s cross motion and granted defendant’s motion to strike the case from the Trial Calendar and directed plaintiff to pay the sum of $150 for "court costs per 8202 CPLR and attorney’s fees”. Plaintiff’s motion to dismiss paragraph "twelfth” of the original answer and counterclaim is rendered moot since the defect in the original was cured by the amended pleading (3 Weinstein-Korn-Miller, NY Civ Prac, par 3025.07). Further, defendant is not entitled to costs on his cross motion or to counsel fees since the court failed to fix costs (CPLR 8202) and defendant made no showing of circumstances sufficient to permit the court to exercise its discretion under section 237 of the Domestic Relations Law (as amd by L 1980, ch 281, § 10) (see 11B Zett-Edmonds-Schwartz, NY Civ Prac, par 38.06, subd [4], par *[a]; Albanese v Albanese,*75 AD2d 987). Accordingly, the order is modified by vacating decretal paragraphs one and three. (Appeal from order of Ontario Supreme Court—strike from calendar.) Present—Simons, J. P., Hancock, Jr., Schnepp, Doerr and Witmer, JJ.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

vs. ) CR. NO. 2:06CR206-MHT

)

ALETHIA ADRIANNE SCOTT )

ORDER

On December 12, 2006, the District Judge assigned to this case received from the

defendant the letter which is attached to this order. The Clerk of the Court is directed to

place the original letter in the file. For good cause, it is

ORDERED that an ex parte hearing concerning the subjects addressed in the letter

be and is hereby set on January 4, 2007, at 11:00 a.m. in Courtroom 4B, United States

Courthouse Complex, One Church Street, Montgomery, Alabama. 

 If the defendant is in custody, the United States Marshal or the person having

custody of her shall produce her for this hearing.

Done this 19 day of December, 2006. th

 /s/Charles S. Coody 

CHARLES S. COODY

CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:06-cr-00206-MHT-CSC Document 59 Filed 12/19/2006 Page 1 of 1
Case 2:06-cr-00206-MHT-CSC Document 59-2 Filed 12/19/2006 Page 1 of 4
Case 2:06-cr-00206-MHT-CSC Document 59-2 Filed 12/19/2006 Page 2 of 4
Case 2:06-cr-00206-MHT-CSC Document 59-2 Filed 12/19/2006 Page 3 of 4
Case 2:06-cr-00206-MHT-CSC Document 59-2 Filed 12/19/2006 Page 4 of 4
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR

THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) CASE NO. 1:06-cr-197-MEF

)

RODERICK CHARLES MELVIN )

O R D E R

Upon consideration of the Motion for Leave to Dismiss the Indictment as to Roderick

Charles Melvin (Doc. #40) filed on February 7, 2007, it is hereby

ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED and this case is DISMISSED.

DONE this the 9th day of February, 2007.

 /s/ Mark E. Fuller 

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:06-cr-00197-MEF-CSC Document 41 Filed 02/09/2007 Page 1 of 1
Case 2:06-cv-00766-MHT-TFM Document 75 Filed 07/09/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:06-cv-00766-MHT-TFM Document 75 Filed 07/09/2007 Page 2 of 2
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

V. ) Case No.: 2:06-mj-082-SRW

)

KIMBERLY JOYCE SELLERS )

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

COMES NOW the undersigned counsel, Leslie S. Smith, and enters her appearance on

behalf of Defendant, Kimberly Joyce Sellers, in the above-styled case.

Dated this 18 day of August 2006. th

Respectfully submitted,

s/Leslie S. Smith

LESLIE S. SMITH

FEDERAL DEFENDERS

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

201 Monroe Street, Suite 407

Montgomery, AL 36104

Phone: (334) 834-2099

Fax: (334) 834-0353

leslie_smith@fd.org

AL Bar Code: SMI162

Case 2:06-mj-00082-SRW Document 7 Filed 08/18/2006 Page 1 of 2
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

V. ) Case No.: 2:06-mj-082-SRW

)

KIMBERLY JOYCE SELLERS )

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on August 18, 2006, I electronically filed the foregoing with the

Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing to the

following: 

David E. Cooke, Esquire

Assistant United States Attorney 

One Court Square, Suite 201

Montgomery, Alabama 36104

Respectfully submitted,

s/Leslie S. Smith

LESLIE S. SMITH

FEDERAL DEFENDERS

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

201 Monroe Street, Suite 407

Montgomery, AL 36104

Phone: (334) 834-2099

Fax: (334) 834-0353

leslie_smith@fd.org

AL Bar Code: SMI162

Case 2:06-mj-00082-SRW Document 7 Filed 08/18/2006 Page 2 of 2
§ 1040.89-8 Prohibition against intimidation or retaliation. A recipient may not engage in acts of intimidation or retaliation against any person who: ( a ) Attempts to assert a right protected by the Act or these regulations; or
( b ) Cooperates in any mediation, investigation, hearing, or other part of DOE's investigation, conciliation, and enforcement process.
59–008 

109TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 2d Session 109–723 

PROVIDING FOR CONSIDERATION OF H.R. 6406, TO MODIFY TEMPORARILY 

CERTAIN RATES OF DUTY AND MAKE OTHER TECHNICAL AMENDMENTS 

TO THE TRADE LAWS, TO EXTEND CERTAIN TRADE PREFERENCE PROGRAMS, AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES 

DECEMBER 7, 2006.—Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

Mr. DREIER, from the Committee on Rules, 

submitted the following 

R E P O R T 

[To accompany H. Res. 1100] 

The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration House 

Resolution 1100, by a nonrecord vote, reports the same to the 

House with the recommendation that the resolution be adopted. 

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

The resolution provides for the consideration of H.R. 6406, to 

modify temporarily certain rates of duty and make other technical 

amendments to the trade laws, to extend certain trade preference 

programs, and for other purposes, under a closed rule. The rule 

provides one hour of debate in the House equally divided and controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on Ways and Means. The rule waives all points of order 

against consideration of the bill. The rule provides one motion to 

recommit. 

The rule provides that, in the engrossment of the House amendment to the Senate amendment to the bill (H.R. 6111) to amend 

the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide that the Tax Court 

may review claims for equitable innocent spouse relief and to suspend the running on the period of limitations while such claims are 

pending, the Clerk shall: 

(a) add the text of H.R. 6406, as passed by the House, as new 

matter at the end of such engrossment; 

(b) assign appropriate designations to provisions within the engrossment; and 

(c) conform provisions for short titles within the engrossment. 


jcorcoran on PRODPC62 with HEARING
2 

EXPLANATION OF WAIVERS

The Committee is not aware of any points of order against consideration of the bill. The waiver of all points of order against consideration of the bill is prophylactic in nature. 

Æ 


jcorcoran on PRODPC62 with HEARING
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 242 (Friday, December 17, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 79024]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-31602]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Connected Media Experience, Inc.

    Notice is hereby given that, on November 1, 2010, pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Connected Media Experience, 
Inc. (``CMX'') has filed written notifications simultaneously with the 
Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in 
its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of 
extending the . Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust 
plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. 
Specifically, Samsung Electronics Co., LTD, Gyeonggi-Do, Republic of 
Korea; and Xertive, Tel Aviv, Israel, have been added as parties to 
this venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and CMX intends to file additional 
written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.
    On March 12, 2010, CMX filed its original notification pursuant to 
Section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice 
in the Federal Register pursuant to Section 6(b) of the Act on April 
16, 2010 (75 FR 20003).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on August 17, 
2010. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
Section 6(b) of the Act on October 12, 2010 (75 FR 62569).

Patricia A. Brink,
Director of Civil Enforcement, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2010-31602 Filed 12-16-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-11-M