alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
¿Cómo puedo obtener

la Cobertura para

Recetas Médicas?

Usted puede inscribirse en un plan

para recetas médicas a partir del 

15 de noviembre de 2005. 

Si usted se inscribe antes del 31 

de diciembre de 2005, su cobertura 

comenzará el 1 de enero de 2006.

Si se inscribe después del 31 de 

diciembre de 2005, su cobertura 

comenzará un mes después de 

su inscripción.

Recuerde que tiene que inscribirse 

para recibir esta cobertura.

El inscribirse le ayudará a obtener

las medicinas que necesita 

ahora y en el futuro.

Fechas Importantes 

de la Cobertura para

Recetas Médicas:

Octubre de 2005

Recibirá el manual de 

Medicare y Usted con más 

información sobre 

como inscribirse.

15 de noviembre de 2005

Comienza el período de

inscripción.

1 de enero de 2006

La cobertura comienza para las

personas que se hayan inscrito

antes del 31 de diciembre de 2005.

15 de mayo de 2006

Último día para inscribirse en

2006. Recuerde inscribirse antes

de esta fecha o usted tendrá que

esperar hasta el 15 de noviembre

de 2006 para inscribirse, y sus

pagos podrían ser más altos.

La Cobertura para Recetas

Médicas está disponible para

todas las personas que 

tengan Medicare.

Las inscripciones comienzan 

el 15 de noviembre de 2005

Lea este folleto para conocer

las respuestas a estas tres 

preguntas:

• ¿Qué me ofrece la Cobertura

para Recetas Médicas de 

Medicare?

• ¿Cómo puedo obtener esta 

Cobertura para Recetas 

Médicas?

• ¿Cómo me inscribo?

CMS PUB No. 11141-S

June 2005
¿Qué me ofrece la

Cobertura para Recetas

Médicas de Medicare?

✓ Le ofrece un seguro que cubre

recetas médicas.

✓ Cubre medicinas de 

marca y genéricas.

✓ Le ofrece diferentes planes. 

Al igual que con cualquier otro 

tipo de seguro, su cargo mensual 

y la cantidad fija que paga cuando 

compra una receta médica puede 

variar según el plan.

¿Cómo me inscribo?

En octubre de 2005 usted recibirá 

más información sobre los planes 

disponobles en su área. 

Esta información le ayudará a: 

• Revisar si sus recetas médicas 

están cubiertas bajo los nuevos 

planes.

• Revisar qué farmacias de su área 

usan los planes, para asegurarse 

de que le sean convenientes.

• Determinar si los cargos

mensuales bajo este plan son

convenientes para usted. 

Todas estas cosas son importantes 

para ayudarle a escoger un plan.

Pasos a seguir para escoger el

plan que más le convenga.

Las inscripciones comienzan el 15

de noviembre de 2005. 

Inscríbase antes del 31 de diciembre

de 2005 para obtener la Cobertura

para Recetas Médicas a partir del 

1 de enero de 2006.

El 15 de mayo es el último día de

inscripción para la cobertura

durante el año 2006.

Para más información visite 

www.medicare.gov/Spanish/

Overview.asp 

o llame gratis al 1-800-MEDICARE

(1-800-633-4227)
§ 1022.15 Timing. ( a ) For a proposed floodplain action, DOE shall allow 15 days for public comment following issuance of a notice of proposed floodplain action. After the close of the public comment period and before issuing a floodplain statement of findings, DOE shall reevaluate the practicability of alternatives to the proposed floodplain action and the mitigating measures, taking into account all substantive comments received. After issuing a floodplain statement of findings, DOE shall endeavor to allow at least 15 days of public review before implementing a proposed floodplain action. If a Federal Register notice is required, the 15-day period begins on the date of publication in the Federal Register.
( b ) For a proposed wetland action, DOE shall allow 15 days for public comment following issuance of a notice of proposed wetland action. After the close of the public comment period, DOE shall reevaluate the practicability of alternatives to the proposed wetland action and the mitigating measures, taking into account all substantive comments received, before implementing a proposed wetland action. If a Federal Register notice is required, the 15-day period begins on the date of publication in the Federal Register.
Case 2:06-cv-00768-ID-SRW Document 1 Filed 08/25/2006 Page 1 of 9
Case 2:06-cv-00768-ID-SRW Document 1 Filed 08/25/2006 Page 2 of 9
Case 2:06-cv-00768-ID-SRW Document 1 Filed 08/25/2006 Page 3 of 9
Case 2:06-cv-00768-ID-SRW Document 1 Filed 08/25/2006 Page 4 of 9
Case 2:06-cv-00768-ID-SRW Document 1 Filed 08/25/2006 Page 5 of 9
Case 2:06-cv-00768-ID-SRW Document 1 Filed 08/25/2006 Page 6 of 9
Case 2:06-cv-00768-ID-SRW Document 1 Filed 08/25/2006 Page 7 of 9
Case 2:06-cv-00768-ID-SRW Document 1 Filed 08/25/2006 Page 8 of 9
Case 2:06-cv-00768-ID-SRW Document 1 Filed 08/25/2006 Page 9 of 9
PGI Part 218 - EMERGENCY ACQUISITIONS       PGI 218.2 -EMERGENCY ACQUISITION FLEXIBILITIES                                                         PGI 218.271 Use of electronic business tools.    **Parent topic:** PGI Defense Federal Acquisition RegulationPGI 218.2 -EMERGENCY ACQUISITION FLEXIBILITIES    PGI 218.271 Use of electronic business tools.       (a) Use of electronic business (e-business) acquisition tools greatly enhances the efficacy of the contracting process in a contingency business environment (CBE). The CBE involves specific tools, policies, roles and responsibilities, and processes necessary to streamline delivery of goods and services to the end user and to implement an e-business program with the capabilities necessary to support an end-to-end electronic acquisition process in order to quickly obtain goods and services for the warfighter in an operational area. For information and procedures to effectively utilize CBE e-business tools, and additional policy references supporting use of the e-business tools, see the DoD CBE Guidebook at                https://www.acq.osd.mil/asda/dpc/cp/cc/docs/resources/CBE_Guidebook.docx            .          (b) Use of the following CBE e-business tools is mandatory when supporting a contingency or humanitarian or peacekeeping operation as defined in FAR 2.101:          (1) The 3in1 Tool. The 3in1 Tool automates the field order, receipt, and purchase processes previously executed manually using the paper Standard Form (SF) 44. The 3in1 handheld device records and transmits cash and carry type purchases and payment data to the prime database for remote reconciliation and review, when conducting on-the-spot, over-the-counter field purchases where use of the Government Purchase Card is appropriate, but not feasible. The 3in1 database may be accessed on the Joint Contingency Contracting Systems (JCCS) website at https://www.jccs.gov/olvr/.          (2) The Acquisition Cross-Servicing Agreements (ACSA) Global Automated Tracking and Reporting System (AGATRS). AGATRS is an automated tool that tracks and provides visibility into worldwide ACSAs that may satisfy a requirement through support from the host nation or other nations supporting the contingency. ACSA transactions that are used in support of contingency or humanitarian or peacekeeping operations are required to be documented and tracked in AGATRS as required by the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Instruction 2120.01D, Acquisition and Cross Servicing Agreements (https://www.jcs.mil/Portals/36/Documents/Library/Instructions/2120_01.p...). AGATRS is accessible on the JCCS website at https://www.jccs.gov/olvr.          (c) No other electronic tools may be used to fulfill the same capabilities as 3in1 and AGATRS.          (d) See PGI 225.370 (a)(ii) regarding use of the Theater Business Clearance CBE e-business tool.
Interim Decision #1411

MAL lax OF MARTINEZ-TORRES
Application for PERMISSION TO REAPPLY

A-6618013


### Decided by Regional Commissioner October 16,1964

Application for permission to reapply for admission, pursuant to section 212(a)(17), Immigration and Nationality Act, is denied, in the exercise of discretion, to an alien convicted of a law relating to illicit traffic in marijuana (26 U.S.C. 4744(1)), since he is mandatorily excludable from the United Statesunder section 212(a) (23) of the Act and no purpose would be served in granting the application.

This case is before the Regional Commissioner on appeal from the District Director's decision denying the application as a matter of discretion. The applicant is a 51-year-old male, a native and citizen of Mexico. He is married to a native and citizen of Mexico who resides in Mexico. The applicant has no children.The applicant was last deported from the United States on January 2, 1962 at El Paso, Texas under the provisions of section 241 (a) (11) of the Immigration and Nationality Act in that "he at any time has been convicted of a violation of any law or regulation relating to the illicit traffic in marihuana. (26 U.S:C.'4744(1) )." The recordin this ease contains a record of criminal proceedings wherein the applicant was convicted and sentenced in the United States District Court at El Paso, Texas for violation of 26 U.S.C. section 4744(1), in that he was a transferee of a quantity of marijuana without paying the tax thereon as required by law, and as a result of such conviction was on December lb, 1961 sentenced by the court to a term of two years imprisonment, and the execution of the sentence was suspended for a period of two years, the defendant (applicant) being placed on probation for that term. As the applicant is mandatorily inadmissible to the United States under the provisions of section 212(a) (23) of the Immigration and Nationality Act as one who has been convicted of a law relating to the illicit traffic in marijuana (26 U.S.C. 1744(1) ), no purpose would

776Interim Decision 40411
be served in granting his application for permission to reapply for admission into the United States. Accordingly, the District Director'saction in denying the application as a matter of administrative discretion was proper and the appeal will be dismissed. 

### ORDER : It is ordered that the appeal be and the same is hereby dismissed.

777
Editorial Note on Part 32
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 32 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

§ 32.16 Certain items containing byproduct material: Records and reports of transfer. ( a ) Each person licensed under § 32.14 shall maintain records of all transfers of byproduct material and file a report with the Director of the Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards by an appropriate method listed in § 30.6(a) of this chapter, including in the address: ATTN: Document Control Desk/Exempt Distribution. ( 1 ) The report must clearly identify the specific licensee submitting the report and include the license number of the specific licensee.
( 2 ) The report must indicate that the products are transferred for use under § 30.15 of this chapter, giving the specific paragraph designation, or equivalent regulations of an Agreement State.
( b ) The report must include the following information on products transferred to other persons for use under § 30.15 or equivalent regulations of an Agreement State: ( 1 ) A description or identification of the type of each product and the model number(s), if applicable;
( 2 ) For each radionuclide in each type of product and each model number, if applicable, the total quantity of the radionuclide; and
( 3 ) The number of units of each type of product transferred during the reporting period by model number, if applicable.
( c ) ( 1 ) The licensee shall file the report, covering the preceding calendar year, on or before January 31 of each year. In its first report after December 17, 2007, the licensee shall separately include data for transfers in prior years not previously reported to the Commission.
( 2 ) Licensees who permanently discontinue activities authorized by the license issued under § 32.14 shall file a report for the current calendar year within 30 days after ceasing distribution.
( d ) If no transfers of byproduct material have been made under § 32.14 during the reporting period, the report must so indicate.
( e ) The licensee shall maintain the record of a transfer for one year after the transfer is included in a report to the Commission.
[72 FR 58487, Oct. 16, 2007, as amended at 73 FR 5719, Jan. 31, 2008; 73 FR 42673, July 23, 2008]
Case 2:06-cv-00766-MHT-TFM Document 67 Filed 07/09/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:06-cv-00766-MHT-TFM Document 67 Filed 07/09/2007 Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>   1
EXHIBIT 3(i)

                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                        TO THE ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION
                          OF SECURITY BANC CORPORATION

Harry O. Egger, who is President, and J. William Stapleton, who is Secretary of
the above named Ohio Corporation for profit with its principal location at 40
South Limestone Street, Springfield, Ohio 45502, who hereby certify that at a
meeting of the Shareholders duly called and held on April 21, 1998, at which
meeting a quorum of the Shareholders was present in person or by proxy and by
the affirmative vote of 84% of the holders of shares entitling them to exercise
the voting power of the Corporation, the following Resolution was adopted to
amend the Articles of Incorporation.

Resolved, that Article IV of the Amended Articles of Incorporation of Security
Banc Corporation be and they are hereby amended in their entirety to read as
follows:

         The aggregate number of common shares which the Corporation shall have
         the authority to issue is eighteen million (18,000,000) shares each of
         one dollar and fifty-six twenty-five cents ($1.5625) par value.

         The Corporation, through its Board of Directors, shall have the power
         to purchase, hold, sell, and transfer the shares of its own capital
         stock provided that it does not use its funds or property for the
         purchase of its own shares of capital stock when such use will cause
         any impairment of its capital, except when otherwise permitted by law,
         and provided further that shares of its own capital stock belonging to
         it are not voted upon directly or indirectly.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the above named officers acting for and on behalf of the
Corporation, have subscribed their names this 21st day of April, 1998.


                                      /s/ Harry O. Egger
                                      ------------------------------------------
                                                       Harry O. Egger, President


                                      /s/ J. William Stapleton
                                      ------------------------------------------
                                                 J. William Stapleton, Secretary
§ 110.7a Completeness and accuracy of information. ( a ) Information provided to the Commission by an applicant for a license or by a licensee or information required by statute or by the Commission's regulations, orders, or license conditions to be maintained by the applicant or the licensee shall be complete and accurate in all material respects.
( b ) Each licensee or applicant for a license shall notify the Commission of information identified by the applicant or licensee as having, for the regulated activity, a significant implication for public health and safety or common defense and security. An applicant or licensee violates this paragraph if the applicant or licensee fails to notify the Commission of information that the applicant or licensee has identified as having a significant implication for public health and safety or common defense and security. Notification shall be provided to the Administrator of the appropriate Regional Office within two working days of identifying the information. This requirement is not applicable to information which is already required to be provided to the Commission by other reporting or updating requirements.
[52 FR 49374, Dec. 31, 1987, as amended at 75 FR 44087, July 28, 2010]
#### § 429.140 Regional standards enforcement procedures.

Sections 429.140 through 429.158 provide enforcement procedures specific to the violations enumerated in § 429.102(c). These provisions explain the responsibilities of manufacturers, private labelers, distributors, contractors and dealers with respect to central air conditioners subject to regional standards; however, these provisions do not limit the responsibilities of parties otherwise subject to 10 CFR parts 429 and 430.

[81 FR 45402, July 14, 2016]
§ 431.428 Effective dates of final rules. ( a ) A final rule exempting a State standard from Federal preemption will be effective: ( 1 ) Upon publication in the Federal Register if the Secretary determines that such rule is needed to meet an “energy emergency condition” within the State;
( 2 ) Three years after such rule is published in the Federal Register; or
( 3 ) Five years after such rule is published in the Federal Register if the Secretary determines that such additional time is necessary due to the burdens of retooling, redesign or distribution.
( b ) A final rule withdrawing a rule exempting a State standard will be effective upon publication in the Federal Register.
Exhibit 13.2

Certification by the Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Constellium N.V. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2013
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Didier Fontaine, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: April 22, 2014



|    |  |                     |  |                        
|--- |  | ------------------- |  | -----------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Didier Fontaine
|    |  | Name:               |  | Didier Fontaine        
|    |  | Title:              |  | Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         263,304
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,284
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               573,670
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,433,807
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           19,235
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                       87,477,847
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,433,807
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                12,504
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   42,866
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                48,344
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (78,706)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (78,706)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (78,706)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.00)
        

</TABLE>
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

September 22, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

136564 Michael F. Cavanag h Elizabeth A. Weave r Marilyn Kell y Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr.

_____________ _____________________________ Stephen J. Markman, J ustices In re JOHN F. ERVIN TESTAMENTARY TRUST

_____________ _____________________________ JANE PEARSON EVANS, a/k/a MARY JANE PEARSON EVANS, Petitioner-Appellant,

v SC: 136564 COA: 270498 Washtenaw Probate Ct: 61-447121-TT BANK ONE TRUST COMPANY, NA, Respondent-Appellee, and

ERVIN INDUSTRIES , JOHN PEARSON, NANCY P. RODOLPH, and ANN E. JORGENSON, Appellees.

________________ _______________ ___________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal th e February 28, 2008 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

0915 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 22, 2008

Clerk
Editorial Note on Part 32
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 32 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

§ 32.23 Same: Safety criteria. An applicant for a license under § 32.22 shall demonstrate that the product is designed and will be manufactured so that: ( a ) In normal use and disposal of a single exempt unit, it is unlikely that the external radiation dose in any one year, or the dose commitment resulting from the intake of radioactive material in any one year, to a suitable sample of the group of individuals expected to be most highly exposed to radiation or radioactive material from the product will exceed the dose to the appropriate organ as specified in Column I of the table in § 32.24 of this part.
( b ) In normal handling and storage of the quantities of exempt units likely to accumulate in one location during marketing, distribution, installation, and servicing of the product, it is unlikely that the external radiation dose in any one year, or the dose commitment resulting from the intake of radioactive material in any one year, to a suitable sample of the group of individuals expected to be most highly exposed to radiation or radioactive material from the product will exceed the dose to the appropriate organ as specified in Column II of the table in § 32.24.
( c ) It is unlikely that there will be a significant reduction in the effectiveness of the containment, shielding, or other safety features of the product from wear and abuse likely to occur in normal handling and use of the product during its useful life.
( d ) *[1]* In use and disposal of a single exempt unit, or in handling and storage of the quantities of exempt units likely to accumulate in one location during marketing, distribution, installation, and servicing of the product, the probability is low that the containment, shielding, or other safety features of the product would fail under such circumstances that a person would receive an external radiation dose or dose commitment in excess of the dose to the appropriate organ as specified in Column III of the table in § 32.24, and the probability is negligible that a person would receive an external radiation dose or dose commitment in excess of the dose to the appropriate organ as specified in Column IV of the table in § 32.24.
[34 FR 9027, June 6, 1969] Footnotes -
32.23
[1] It is the intent of this paragraph that as the magnitude of the potential dose increases above that permitted under normal conditions, the probability that any individual will receive such a dose must decrease. The probabilities have been expressed in general terms to emphasize the approximate nature of the estimates which are to be made. The following values may be used as guides in estimating compliance with the criteria: Low—not more than one such failure per year for each 10,000 exempt units distributed. Negligible—not more than one such failure per year for each 1 million exempt units distributed.