alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
32.2





Section
1350 Certification





In connection with the quarterly report
of China Industrial Waste Management, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the
period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the "Report"), I, Guo Xin, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





August
      14, 2009
              /s/ Guo XinGuo
      XinChief
      Financial Officer





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
2452.3 Provision and clause matrix.














Parent topic: Subpart 2452.3 - Matrix
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of
ImClone Systems Incorporated (the "Company") for the period ended September 30,
2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Michael J. Howerton, Acting Chief Financial Officer and
Secretary of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
     or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.

                                                /s/ MICHAEL J. HOWERTON
                                          --------------------------------------
                                                   Michael J. Howerton
                                              Acting Chief Financial Officer

November 13, 2003

     This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### In the Matter of Lake Grove Partners, LLC, Appellant, v Scott D. Middleton, Respondent.

[814 NYS2d 741]

In a proceeding, inter alia, pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a resolution of the Board of Trustees of the Incorporated Village of Lake Grove dated June 3, 2004, issuing a negative declaration pursuant to the State Environmental Quality Review Act (ECL art 8) regarding the adoption of a “Business Districts Plan” and the enactment of its implementing legislation, the petitioner appeals from (1) a decision of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Alpert, J.), dated March 11, 2005, and (2) a judgment of the same court entered April 13, 2005, which, upon the decision, denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the appeal from the decision is dismissed, as no appeal lies from a decision *(see Schicchi v J.A. Green Constr. Corp.,*100 AD2d 509, 509-510 [1984]); and it is further,

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed; and it is further,

Ordered that one bill of costs is awarded to the respondents.

Contrary to the petitioner’s contention, the record demonstrates that the Board of Trustees of the Incorporated Village of Lake Grove took a hard look at the relevant areas of environmental concern, and set forth a reasoned elaboration of the basis of its determination to issue the negative declaration *(see Niagara Recycling v Town Bd. of Town of Niagara,*83 AD2d 335, 341 [1981], *affd*56 NY2d 859 [1982]). Furthermore, that determination is neither affected by an error of law nor was it arbitrary and capricious *(see Matter of Gernatt Asphalt Prods. v Town of Sardinia,*87 NY2d 668, 688-690 [1996]; *Patterson Materials Corp. v Town of Pawling,*264 AD2d 510, 511-512 [1999]; *cf. Matter of Philger Realty Corp. v Town Bd. of Town of E. Hampton,*262 AD2d 564, 564-565 [1999]). Accordingly, the Supreme Court correctly denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

The petitioner’s remaining contentions are either not properly before this Court *(cf. Matter of Khatib v Liverpool Cent. School Dist.,*244 AD2d 957 [1997]; *Schuster v Schweitzer,*203 AD2d 552, 553 [1994]), or are without merit. Florio, J.P., Adams, Goldstein and Lunn, JJ., concur.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 312 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 312

    Recognizing National Homeownership Month and the importance of 
                  homeownership in the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 9, 2005

Mr. Gary G. Miller of California (for himself, Mr. Oxley, Mr. Frank of 
   Massachusetts, Mr. Ney, Ms. Waters, and Ms. Harris) submitted the 
following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Financial 
                                Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
    Recognizing National Homeownership Month and the importance of 
                  homeownership in the United States.

Whereas the President of the United States has issued a proclamation designating 
        the month of June 2005 as National Homeownership Month;
Whereas the national homeownership rate in the United States has reached a 
        record high of 69.1 percent and more than half of all minority families 
        are homeowners;
Whereas the people of the United States are one of the best-housed populations 
        in the world;
Whereas owning a home is a fundamental part of the American dream and is the 
        largest personal investment many families will ever make;
Whereas homeownership provides economic security for homeowners by aiding them 
        in building wealth over time and strengthens communities through a 
        greater stake among homeowners in local schools, civic organizations, 
        and churches;
Whereas improving homeownership opportunities requires the commitment and 
        cooperation of the private, public, and nonprofit sectors, including the 
        Federal Government and State and local governments; and
Whereas the current laws of the United States, such as the American Dream 
        Downpayment Act, encourage homeownership and should continue to do so in 
        the future: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved,  That the House of Representatives--
            (1) fully supports the goals and ideals of National 
        Homeownership Month; and
            (2) recognizes the importance of homeownership in building 
        strong communities and families.
                                 <all>
```
#### § 1013.45 Deposit in Treasury of United States.

All amounts collected pursuant to this part shall be deposited as miscellaneous receipts in the Treasury of the United States, except as provided in 31 U.S.C. 3806(g).
Page 1

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

Supreme Court Cause No. DA-24-0126

MEL COOK, LOEY KNAPP, JAMES WALTERS, DAVID MCKINLEY, 

SUSAN EVANS, PAT GRONINGER, TERRI GRONINGER,

Appellee,

vs.

BERTA’S FARM, LLC, a Montana Limited Liability Company,

Appellant.

On Appeal from the Montana Twenty-First Judicial District Court

Ravalli County, Cause No. DV-41-2017-0000455-OC

Before Hon. Jennifer B. Lint

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION TO DISMISS

Upon the Unopposed Motion of Defendant/ Appellant Berta’s Farm, LLC to dismiss 

the above-entitled matter, and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this matter is hereby Dismissed.

DATED AND ELECTRONICALLY SIGNED BELOW.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 28 2024

08/28/2024

Case Number: DA 24-0126
2007-1907.

#### State v. Clardy.

Hamilton App. No. C-060527, 2007-Ohio-4193. On motion for leave to file delayed appeal. Motion granted.

O’Connor and Lanzinger, JJ., dissent.
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 11-1052

___________

 *

Friends of Weiner School District, *

*

Plaintiff - Appellant, *

*

Department of Agriculture, *

Involuntary/Third-Party Plaintiff; *

Weiner School District, *

Involuntary/Third-Party Plaintiff, *

*

Plaintiffs, *

*

v. * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the

State of Arkansas; Arkansas * Eastern District of Arkansas.

Department of Emergency *

Management; David Maxwell, in his * [UNPUBLISHED]

official capacity; Arkansas State Board *

of Education; Naccaman Williams, Dr., *

in his official capacity; Ben Mays, Dr., *

in his official capacity; Sherry Burrow, *

in her official capacity; Jim Cooper, in *

his official capacity; Brenda Gullet, in *

her official capacity; Samuel Ledbetter, *

in his official capacity; Alice Williams *

Mahony, in her official capacity; *

Toyce Newton, in her official capacity; *

Vickie Saviers, in her official capacity; *

Arkansas Department of Education; *

Harrisburg School District; *

*
Mike Beebe, Governor, in his *

official capacity, *

*

Defendants - Appellees. *

*

___________

Submitted: November 14, 2011

Filed: December 15, 2011

___________

Before SMITH, BOWMAN, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Friends of Weiner School District, a non-profit citizens group, appeals froman

order of the District Court dismissing their Commerce Clause action that alleged

1

violations of federal and state law by Appelleesin connection with the administrative

consolidation of the Weiner School District with the Harrisburg School District in

Poinsett County, Arkansas. Upon careful de novo review, see LeMay v. U.S. Postal

Service, 450 F.3d 797, 799 (8th Cir. 2006), we conclude that dismissal was proper for

the reasons stated by the District Court. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. 

______________________________

The Honorable James M. Moody, United States District Judge for the Eastern 1

District of Arkansas. 

-2-
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

ELISHA JAMES, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:06cv768-ID

)

THERMASYS CORP., )

)

Defendant. )

ORDER

Based upon the Joint Stipulation for Dismissal, filed by the parties on September

5, 2007, (Doc. No. 9), it is ORDERED that the above-styled cause be and the same is

hereby DISMISSED with prejudice, with each party to bear his and its own costs.

Done this 12th day of September, 2007.

/s/ Ira DeMent 

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00768-ID-SRW Document 10 Filed 09/12/2007 Page 1 of 1
#### In the Matter of Shawn Green, Appellant, v Glenn S. Goord, as Commissioner of the New York State Department of Correctional Services, Respondent.

Submitted October 22, 2007;

decided December 18, 2007

Reported below, 42 AD3d 966, 2007 NY Slip Op 79836(U).

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the July 2007 Appellate Division order, dismissed as untimely *(see*CPLR 5513 [b]; *Eaton v State of New York,*76 NY2d 824 [1990]); motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the September 2007 Appellate Division order denying reargument, dismissed upon the ground that such order does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution. Motion for poor person relief dismissed as academic.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22

- 6895

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v.
TARIK COEFIELD , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Alexandria

. Leonie M. Brinkema , District Judge. ( 1:93

- cr - 00339

- LMB )

Submitted : December 20 , 2022 Decided: December 27, 2022

Before NIEMEYER and QUATTLEBAUM Circuit Judges , and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Tarik Coefield, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 22-6895 Doc: 13 Filed: 12/27/2022 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM: Tarik Coefield appeals the dist rict court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A) motion for compassionate release. We review a district court’s order granting or denying a compassionate release motion for abuse of discretion. United States
v. Kibble , 992 F.3d 326, 329 (4th Cir. ) (stating standard of review), cert. denied , 142 S. Ct. 383 (2021). We have reviewed the record and conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in analyzing the relevant 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors. See United States v. High , 997 F.3d 181, 189 (4th Cir. 2021). We therefore affirm the district court’s order. We deny Coefield’s motion to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court

an d argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED USCA4 Appeal: 22-6895 Doc: 13 Filed: 12/27/2022 Pg: 2 of 2
Department of the Treasury—Internal Revenue Service

Partner Volunteer Outreach Activity Report

Please use this form to record your volunteer activities. Your data is very important for

the current and future success of our programs.

Name(s) of Partner/Volunteer:

Number of Volunteers:

Date of Activity:

Type of Activity conducted. Please check only ONE item. If you conducted more than

one activity, please use one report for each activity.

Teaching VITA

Bank, Post Office and Library

Outreach - Media

Outreach - Mailings

Outreach - All Other

EITC - Media

EITC - Mailings

EITC - All Other

E-Services - Media

E-Services - Mailings

E-Services - All Other

How many people did you reach during this activity?

Description of Activity

Our office values your feedback. Please share stories, comments, or any additional

information.

Cat. No. 34687B Form 13315 (8-2002)
#### § 39.17 Request for written statements.

Each license is issued with the condition that the licensee will, at any time before expiration of the license, upon the Commission's request, submit written statements, signed under oath or affirmation, to enable the Commission to determine whether or not the license should be modified, suspended, or revoked.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                  1

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         915,222
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,179
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                  1,379,295
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,312,949
<PP&E>                                          34,097
<DEPRECIATION>                                  23,143
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,339,123
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          138,776
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,200,347
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,339,123
<SALES>                                      1,316,250
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,347,948
<CGS>                                        1,075,801
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,075,801
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               359,843
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 793
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (88,489)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (88,489)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (88,489)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
2422.1408 Contract clause.

(c) The Contracting Officer shall insert the clause at 2452.222-70, Accessibility of Meetings,

Conferences, and Seminars to Persons with Disabilities, in solicitations and contracts when the

contract will require the contractor (including contractor employees and subcontractors) to hold

meetings, conferences or seminars.

Parent topic: Subpart 2422.14 - Employment of the Handicapped
§ 205.84 DOE evaluation. ( a ) *Processing.* ( 1 ) The DOE may initiate an investigation of any statement in a request and utilize in its evaluation any relevant facts obtained by such investigation. The DOE may accept submissions from third persons relevant to any request for interpretation provided that the person making the request is afforded an opportunity to respond to all third person submissions. In evaluating a request for interpretation, the DOE may consider any other source of information. The DOE on its own initiative may convene a conference, if, in its discretion, it considers that such conference will advance its evaluation of the request.
( 2 ) The DOE shall issue its interpretation on the basis of the information provided in the request, unless that information is supplemented by other information brought to the attention of the General Counsel or a Regional Counsel during the proceeding. The interpretation shall, therefore, depend for its authority on the accuracy of the factual statement and may be relied upon only to the extent that the facts of the actual situation correspond to those upon which the interpretation was based.
( 3 ) If the DOE determines that there is insufficient information upon which to base a decision and if upon request additional information is not submitted by the person requesting the interpretation, the DOE may refuse to issue an interpretation.
( b ) *Criteria.* ( 1 ) The DOE shall base an interpretation on the FEA and EPAA and the regulations and published rulings of the DOE as applied to the specific factual situation.
( 2 ) The DOE shall take into consideration previously issued interpretations dealing with the same or a related issue.
Editorial Note on Part 34
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 34 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

§ 34.79 Records of training and certification. Each licensee shall maintain the following records (of training and certification) for 3 years after the record is made: ( a ) Records of training of each radiographer and each radiographer's assistant. The record must include radiographer certification documents and verification of certification status, copies of written tests, dates of oral and practical examinations, and names of individuals conducting and receiving the oral and practical examinations; and
( b ) Records of annual refresher safety training and semi-annual inspections of job performance for each radiographer and each radiographer's assistant. The records must list the topics discussed during the refresher safety training, the dates the annual refresher safety training was conducted, and names of the instructors and attendees. For inspections of job performance, the records must also include a list showing the items checked and any non-compliances observed by the RSO.
##### 



EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
 th
 Whereas
 Whereas
 Now, Therefore
 ARTICLE I
DEFINITIONS
  1.1 Affiliate
 1.2 Board
 1.3 Business
 1.4 Cause
 (a) (b) (c) nolo contendere




---



##### 



1.5 Change in Control
 1.6 Confidentiality Agreement
 1.7 Control
 1.8 Covered Entity provided however
 1.9 Disability
 1.10 Involuntary Termination Without Cause
 2




---



##### 



1.11 Section 409A
 1.12 Severance Period
 1.13 Sponsors
 1.14 Term
 1.15 Territory
 1.16 Voluntary Termination for Good Reason
 (a)
 (b)
 (c)
 (d)
 (e)
 (f)
 3




---



##### 



ARTICLE II
EMPLOYMENT BY THE COMPANY
 2.1 Position and Duties.
 2.2 Employment Policies.
 ARTICLE III
COMPENSATION
 3.1 Base Salary.
 3.2 Target Bonus
 3.3 Equity Compensation
 4




---



##### 



3.4 Standard Company Benefits.
 ARTICLE IV
TERMINATION
 4.1 Termination for Cause; Voluntary Termination for Any Reason other than Good Reason.
 4.2 Involuntary Termination Without Cause; Voluntary Termination for Good Reason.
 4.3 Termination On or After a Change in Control
 5




---



##### 



ARTICLE V
COVENANTS OF EXECUTIVE
 5.1 Confidentiality Agreement.
 5.2 Non-Compete. provided however
 6




---



##### 



5.3 Non-Solicitation.
 5.4 Enforcement; Remedies.
 5.5 Severability and Modification of Any Unenforceable Covenant.
 ARTICLE VI
GENERAL PROVISIONS
 6.1 Notices.
 7




---



##### 



To the Company:
    
    
    
    Avago TechnologiesAttn: General Counsel350 W. Trimble Road, MS 90MGSan Jose, CA 95131Facsimile: 408-435-4172To Executive:
    
    
    
    Fariba Danesh3 Puri CourtPleasanton, CA 94588Facsimile:
 6.2 Severability.
 6.3 Modifications; Waivers.
 6.4 Entire Agreement.
 (a)
 (b)
 6.5 Counterparts.
 8




---



##### 



6.6 Headings.
 6.7 Successors and Assigns. provided however
 6.8 Survival of Rights and Obligations.
 6.9 Joint Preparation.
 6.10 Arbitration. By agreeing to this
arbitration procedure, both Executive and the Company waive the right to resolve any such dispute
through a trial by jury or judge or administrative proceeding
 9




---



##### 



6.11 Third Party Beneficiaries.
 6.12 Withholding.
 6.13 Attorneys Fees
 6.14 Choice of Law.
 6.15 Internal Revenue Code Section 409A.
 ( Signature page follows )
 10




---



##### 



In Witness Whereof
 AVAGO TECHNOLOGIESBy:
    
    /s/ Hock E. TanName: Hock E. TanTitle: PresidentEXECUTIVE/s/ Fariba DaneshFARIBA DANESH
 Signature Page to Avago Technologies U.S. Inc. Employment Agreement
Case 2:06-cr-00198-WKW-CSC Document 33 Filed 11/13/2006 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:06-cr-00198-WKW-CSC Document 33 Filed 11/13/2006 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:06-cr-00198-WKW-CSC Document 33 Filed 11/13/2006 Page 3 of 3
Case 2:06-cr-00198-WKW-CSC Document 33-2 Filed 11/13/2006 Page 1 of 1