alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 239 (Tuesday, December 14, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 77888]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-31318]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders; 
Notice of Closed Meetings

    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended (5 U.S.C. App.), notice is hereby given of the following 
meetings.
    The meetings will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Deafness and Other 
Communication Disorders Special Emphasis Panel; Accessible and 
Affordable Hearing Health Care.
    Date: January 18, 2011.
    Time: 10 a.m. to 2 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6120 Executive Blvd., 
Rockville, MD 20852, (Telephone Conference Call)
    Contact Person: Shiguang Yang, DVM, PhD, Scientific Review 
Officer, Division of Extramural Activities, NIDCD, NIH, 6120 
Executive Blvd., Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-496-8683.

    Name of Committee: National Institute on Deafness and Other 
Communication Disorders Special Emphasis Panel; NIDCD Immune-
Mediated Ear Disease/Hearing Loss.
    Date: January 26, 2011.
    Time: 10 a.m. to 11:30 a.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, 6120 Executive Blvd., 
Rockville, MD 20852, (Telephone Conference Call)
    Contact Person: Shiguang Yang, DVM, PhD, Scientific Review 
Officer, Division of Extramural Activities, NIDCD, NIH, 6120 
Executive Blvd., Bethesda, MD 20892, 301-496-8683.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.173, 
Biological Research Related to Deafness and Communicative Disorders, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: December 8, 2010.
Jennifer S. Spaeth,
Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2010-31318 Filed 12-13-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
§ 1002.3 Custody of official seal and distinguishing flags. The Secretary or his designee shall: ( a ) Have custody of: ( 1 ) The official seal and prototypes thereof, and masters, molds, dies, and all other means of producing replicas, reproductions, and embossing seals; and
( 2 ) Production, inventory and loan records relating to items specified in paragraph (a)(1) of this section; and
( b ) Have custody of distinguishing flags, and be responsible for production, inventory, and loan records thereof.
Case 3:06-cv-00742-MEF-WC Document 22 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 3:06-cv-00742-MEF-WC Document 22 Filed 08/07/2007 Page 2 of 2
Subpart 1913.5 - Purchase Orders    **Parent topic:** PART 1913 - SMALL PURCHASES AND OTHER SIMPLIFIED PURCHASE PROCEDURES1913.505 Purchase order and related forms.1913.505-2 Board order forms in lieu of Optional and Standard Forms.       (a) Optional Forms 347 and 348 shall be used as prescribed in FAR 13.505 unless an equivalent form has been authorized for use by the Board Procurement Executive (or Designee). Exceptions may be granted, on a case-by-case basis, in order to accommodate computer-generated purchase order forms. Exception approval for over printing (FAR 53.104) is not needed.          (b) The Broadcasting Board of Governors Form IA-44 (see 1953.370-44) is authorized for use when obtaining nonpersonal services on an intermittent basis for such services as script writers, translators, narrators, etc.
# Subpart 330.2 - CAS Program Requirements

**Parent topic:**PART 330 - COST ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

## 330.201 Contract requirements.

## 330.201-5 Waiver.

The Senior Procurement Executive (SPE) shall exercise the waiver authority under Federal Acquisition Regulation 30.201-5(a)(2). Operating Divisions and Staff Divisions shall forward waiver requests to the SPE.
###### Editorial Note on Part 1045

#### Editorial Notes:Nomenclature changes to part 1045 appear at 88 FR 41294, June 26, 2023, and 88 FR 82238, Nov. 24, 2023.

§ 1045.205 How does DOE conduct an MDR review?

Editorial Notes:

Nomenclature changes to part 1045 appear at 88 FR 41294, June 26, 2023, and 88 FR 82238, Nov. 24, 2023.

(a) If DOE has reviewed the information contained in the requested matter for declassification within the past 2 years, DOE need not conduct another review. DOE may instead inform the requester of this fact and of the prior review decision, as well as advise the requester of his or her appeal rights as provided in § 1045.210.

(b) DOE performs an MDR as follows:

(1) Conducts a line-by-line review of the matter;

(2) Coordinates the review with appropriate programs and agencies, as necessary;

(3) Identifies and withholds any information that meets the standards for classification;

(4) Declassifies any NSI that no longer meets the standards for classification under E.O. 13526 or successor orders and any RD, FRD, or TFNI that no longer meets the standards for classification under this part;

(5) If the matter also contains unclassified information that is potentially exempt from release under the FOIA, the matter is further processed to ensure unclassified information that is exempt from public release is identified and that the appropriate officials responsible for denying any unclassified portion of the matter are provided and listed with the notice of denial.

(6) Upon completion of the review, releases the matter to the requester unless withholding is authorized by law. If NSI, RD, FRD, or TFNI, is withheld, the response must advise the requester of his or her appeal rights under § 1045.210.
#### § 1010.104 Cooperation with the Inspector General.

Employees shall respond to questions truthfully under oath when required, whether orally or in writing, and must provide documents and other materials concerning matters of official interest. An employee is not required to respond to such official inquiries if answers or testimony may subject the employee to criminal prosecution.
§ 205.15 Public docket room. There shall be established at the DOE National Office, 12th and Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC, a public docket room in which shall be made available for public inspection and copying: ( a ) A list of all persons who have applied for an exception, an exemption, or an appeal, and a digest of each application;
( b ) Each decision and statement setting forth the relevant facts and legal basis of an order, with confidential information deleted, issued in response to an application for an exception or exemption or at the conclusion of an appeal;
( c ) The comments received during each rulemaking proceeding, with a verbatim transcript of the public hearing if such a public hearing was held; and
( d ) Any other information required by statute to be made available for public inspection and copying, and any information that the DOE determines should be made available to the public.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> US DOLLALRS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1995
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          12,737
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 9,500
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     33,381
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          34,106
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            34,379
<LOANS>                                        284,976
<ALLOWANCE>                                      3,880
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 389,046
<DEPOSITS>                                     335,646
<SHORT-TERM>                                     4,774
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              3,282
<LONG-TERM>                                      3,509
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,424
<OTHER-SE>                                      36,560
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 389,046
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 19,902
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                3,082
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   381
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                23,365
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               9,335
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,660
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           13,705
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      493
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   6
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  7,996
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,310
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       7,310
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,547
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    10.22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       0
<LOANS-NON>                                        885
<LOANS-PAST>                                     1,003
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 3,447
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      436
<RECOVERIES>                                       376
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                3,880
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             3,880
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
#### § 1015.404 Exception to termination.

When a significant enforcement policy is involved, or recovery of a judgment is a prerequisite to the imposition of administrative sanctions, DOE may refer debts for litigation even though termination of collection activity may otherwise be appropriate.
Subpart 2839.1 - General

Parent topic: PART 2839 - ACQUISITION OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY

2839.101 Policy.

DOJ's Chief Information Officer (CIO) and SPE are responsible for issuing policies and procedures to

manage the agency information technology (IT) acquisition process.

2839.102 Management of risk.

Contracts involving DOJ Information and Information Systems shall comply with the security

requirements prescribed in FAR 39.102 and all applicable DOJ security requirements, including

without limitation all DOJ Policy Statements and DOJ Policy Instructions established under the DOJ

Acquisition Management Order relating to the Management of Risk of DOJ Information and

Information Systems.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 13, 2019

No. 04-18-00286-CV

Jimmy MASPERO and Regina Maspero, Individually, and as Next Friends of Wyitt Maspero, 

Wynnsday Maspero, Wesley Maspero, Deceased, and Walter Maspero, Deceased, Minor 

Children,

Appellants

v.

CITY OF SAN ANTONIO,

Appellee

From the 285th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014CI14946

Honorable David Peeples, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Order by: Beth Watkins, Justice

Dissenting Opinion by: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice 

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice (not participating)

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice1

Irene Rios, Justice

Beth Watkins, Justice

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

Appellee’s motion for en banc reconsideration is DENIED. 

_________________________________

Beth Watkins, Justice

 

1 Dissents to the denial of the motion for en banc reconsideration without requesting a response. See TEX. R. APP. P. 

49.2. 
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 13th day of November, 2019.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ,

Clerk of Court
IV 

House Calendar No. 41

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 243

[Report No. 109–90] 

Recognizing the Coast Guard, the Coast Guard Auxiliary, and the National 

Safe Boating Council for their efforts to promote National Safe Boating 

Week. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 27, 2005

Mr. COOPER (for himself, Mr. TAYLOR of Mississippi, and Mr. SHAW) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 

Transportation and Infrastructure 

MAY 23, 2005

Additional sponsors: Mr. SOUDER, Mr. BONNER, Mrs. MILLER of Michigan, 

Mr. GRIJALVA, Ms. BORDALLO, Mr. HASTINGS of Florida, Mr. MCINTYRE, Mr. ISRAEL, Mr. INSLEE, Mr. BURTON of Indiana, Mr. ROGERS

of Kentucky, Mr. UPTON, Mr. DELAHUNT, Ms. HARRIS, Mrs. CUBIN, Mr. 

GILLMOR, Mr. DEAL of Georgia, Mr. TANNER, Mr. SAXTON, and Mr. 

FITZPATRICK of Pennsylvania 

MAY 23, 2005

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

RESOLUTION

Recognizing the Coast Guard, the Coast Guard Auxiliary, 

and the National Safe Boating Council for their efforts 

to promote National Safe Boating Week.
2

•HRES 243 RH 

Whereas recreational boating is one of our Nation’s most 

popular pastimes, with an estimated 78,000,000 recreational boaters in the United States and nearly 

13,000,000 recreational vessels registered; 

Whereas the number of recreational boating fatalities has declined by more than half since 1970, thanks to the increased use of life jackets, cooperative boating safety education, enforcement efforts between the Coast Guard and 

State governments, and safer vessels and equipment 

manufactured in accordance with Coast Guard standards; 

Whereas recreational boating accidents have nevertheless 

claimed the lives of 703 Americans in 2003, more than 

half of whose lives could have been saved with the proper 

use of a personal flotation device; 

Whereas a continued emphasis on accident prevention can reduce recreational boating fatalities still further, and in 

particular deaths by drowning, which remain the leading 

cause of recreational boating fatalities; and 

Whereas the National Safe Boating Council, with the support 

of the Coast Guard and the Coast Guard Auxiliary, has 

proposed designating the week of May 21 through 27, 

2005, as National Safe Boating Week: Now, therefore, be 

it

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

2 (1) supports initiatives for recreational boating 

3 safety education and accident prevention to minimize 

4 the number of annual recreational boating fatalities; 

5 (2) recognizes the Coast Guard, the Coast 

6 Guard Auxiliary, and the National Safe Boating 

7 Council for their efforts each year during May to 
3

•HRES 243 RH 

1 highlight the importance of safe recreational boat2 ing; and 

3 (3) supports the goals of National Safe Boating 

4 Week. 
House Calendar No. 41

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 243

[Report No. 109–90] 

RESOLUTION

Recognizing the Coast Guard, the Coast Guard 

ing Week. for their efforts to promote National Safe BoatAuxiliary, and the National Safe Boating Council 

MAY 23, 2005

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed
§ 987.34 Development. As early as practicable, but no later than October 31, the Committee shall prepare and submit to the Secretary, a report setting forth its marketing policy, including data on which it is based, by variety, for regulation of dates in the crop year. ( a ) The committee shall consider such factors as: ( 1 ) The estimated production of dates during the crop year;
( 2 ) The estimated production of DAC dates, export dates, and product dates;
( 3 ) The handler carryin on October 1 of dates of those qualities;
( 4 ) The estimated trade demand in each outlet during the crop year; and
( 5 ) The desirable carryout, by outlet.
( b ) If dates to be handled as free dates are not synonymous with those to be handled in DAC outlets, the Committee shall consider such additional factors as: ( 1 ) The supply of marketable dates that will be available from the estimated production, and from the October 1 carryin, that could be used as free dates, and
( 2 ) The estimated trade demand for free dates during the current crop year, and the desirable carryout for free dates.
( c ) The Committee shall submit its recommendation as to grade, size, and container regulations and its recommendation whether free and restricted percentages should be established and if so, the free and restricted percentages and the appropriate withholding factor.
[43 FR 4252, Feb. 1, 1978]
Case 2:06-cv-00771-ID-SRW Document 7 Filed 09/14/2006 Page 1 of 1
# STATEOFLOUISIANA



# COURTOFAPPEAL,FIRSTCIRCUIT

STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS 

### JAMIE JOHN DUPRE, II NO. 

### 2022 KW 1003
SEPTEMBER 12, 2022

In Re: Jamie John Dupre, II, 

### applying for supervisory writs,



### 32nd Judicial District Court, Parish of Terrebonne, No. 831966.
BEFORE: THERIOT, CHUTZ, AND HESTER, JJ.

WRIT GRANTED. 

## The trial court's ruling granting a mistrial sua sponte 

### is vacated, and this matter is remanded to the trial court to 

### investigate whether the members of the 

## jury overheard any comment(s) 

## madebyjurornumber57. If the court finds that members of the 

## jury overheard the comment( s) made 

## by juror number 57, the court is 

### instructed to question the 

### jurors 

## individually to determine whether the comment( s) would have any 

### influence on his or her deliberation. See State v. Hills, 

### 2019- 0466 ( La. 

### App. 1st Cir. 

### 7/9/ 19), 2019 WL 3024107. MRT WRC CHH

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT 

# as' -

f- 

# 0 DEPUTY CLERK OF COURT

FOR THE COURT
exv10w22






Exhibit 10.22




SCHEDULE OF WARRANTS

SUBSTANTIALLY IDENTICAL IN ALL MATERIAL RESPECTS

TO THE FORM OF WARRANT FILED AS

EXHIBIT 10.21 TO THIS REGISTRATION STATEMENT ON FORM S-1

PURSUANT TO

INSTRUCTION 2 TO ITEM 601 OF REGULATION S-K




     In accordance with the Instructions to Item 601 of Regulation S-K, the Registrant has omitted
filing certain warrants issued by Mirion Technologies, Inc. to
purchase Shares of its common stock as exhibits to this
Registration Statement on Form S-1 because they are substantially identical in all material
respects to the Form of Warrant filed as Exhibit 10.21.



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Certificate	 	Number of Shares	 	 	 	 
	Warrant Holder	 	Number	 	Issuable on Exercise	 	Exercise Price	 	Date of Issuance
	Michael S. Wilson
	 	 	W-2	 	 	 	1,091	 	 	$	0.01	 	 	January 1, 2006
	Philippe Destenbert
	 	 	W-3	 	 	 	18,012	 	 	$	0.01	 	 	January 1, 2006
	Thomas D. Logan
	 	 	W-4	 	 	 	4,063	 	 	$	0.01	 	 	January 1, 2006
	American Capital Equity I, LLC
	 	 	W-5	 	 	 	113,017	 	 	$	0.001	 	 	October 3, 2006
	American Capital Strategies, Ltd.
	 	 	W-7	 	 	 	2,538	 	 	$	0.001	 	 	October 3, 2006
	American Capital Strategies, Ltd.
	 	 	W-8	 	 	 	219,618	 	 	$	0.001	 	 	October 3, 2007
	American Capital Equity II, LP
	 	 	W-9	 	 	 	44,089	 	 	$	0.001	 	 	October 3, 2007
5235.070-1 Indemnification under research

and development contracts.

(a) DASN(P) is the approval authority.

(b) Submit requests for indemnification approval to DASN(P) by email at

usn.pentagon.asstsecnavrdadc.mbx.pabt@us.navy.mil with the subject “[Activity Name] DFARS

235.070-1 – Indemnification Request under R&D Contracts.”

Parent topic: 5235.070 Indemnification against unusually hazardous risks.
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 111 (Friday, June 8, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 34121]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-13977]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 7918]

Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Revealing the African Presence in Renaissance 
Europe''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 
of August 28, 2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority No. 
257 of April 15, 2003), I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``Revealing the African Presence in 
Renaissance Europe'' imported from abroad for temporary exhibition 
within the United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are 
imported pursuant to loan agreements with the foreign owners or 
custodians. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the 
exhibit objects at The Walters Art Museum, Baltimore, MD, from on or 
about October 14, 2012, until on or about January 21, 2013; at the 
Princeton University Art Museum, Princeton, NJ, from on or about 
February 16, 2013, until on or about June 9, 2013, and at possible 
additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the 
national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these 
Determinations be published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Julie Simpson, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6467). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, 
Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: June 5, 2012.
J. Adam Ereli,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and 
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2012-13977 Filed 6-7-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

MILDRED W. ANDERSON, et al., )

)

Plaintiffs, )

)

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:06cv739-LES

)

PACTIV CORPORATION, et al, )

)

Defendants. )

ORDER

Now pending before the court is the defendants’ motion for an enlargement of time

to respond to the complaint (doc. # 5). The plaintiffs do not object to the motion.

Accordingly, upon consideration of the motion and for good cause, it is 

ORDERED that the motion for an enlargement of time to respond to the complaint

(doc. # 5) be and is hereby GRANTED and the defendants’ time for responding to the

complaint be and is hereby EXTENDED to September 25, 2006.

Done this 18 day of August, 2006. th

 /s/Charles S. Coody 

CHARLES S. COODY

CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00739-LES-CSC Document 9 Filed 08/18/2006 Page 1 of 1