alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the accompanyingQuarterly Report of Greene County Bancshares, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the quarter ended September 30, 2004 (the “Report”), I, R. Stan Puckett,Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifypursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)           The Reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
|   |   |   | /s/ R. Stan  Puckett |                                       |
|--------|--------|--------|----------------------|--------------------------------------------|
|   |   |   |                 | R. Stan  Puckett                           |
|   |   |   |                 | Chairman of  the Board and Chief Executive |
|   |   |   |                 | Officer                                    |
|        |        |        |                      |                                            |  |

 

Date:  November 5, 2004

 

----
Exhibit No. 32.6   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with this report of Questar Gas Company (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Kevin W. Hadlock, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  QUESTAR GAS COMPANY   May 6, 2011 /s/Kevin W. Hadlock Kevin W. Hadlock Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit No. 12.

Questar Pipeline Company and Subsidiaries
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
(Unaudited)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>                                       12 months ended June 30,
                                                    2000        1999
                                                (Dollars in Thousands)
<S>                                             <C>         <C>
Earnings

Income (loss) before income taxes                  ($12,985)    $43,782
Plus debt expense                                    18,342      15,737
Plus allowance for borrowed
   funds used during construction                     2,796       1,821
Plus interest portion of rental expense                 273         285
                                                     $8,426     $61,625

Fixed Charges

Debt expense                                        $18,342     $15,737
Plus allowance for borrowed
   funds used during construction                     2,796       1,821
Plus interest portion of rental expense                 273         285
                                                    $21,411     $17,843

Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges                     0.39        3.45

</TABLE>
<PAGE>
HaaIAIr

77°00"
—_—_ 39°00

7800"
. i |
|

CaBWON SNIAAVEO

|
|
i
|
i
|
i
| |
(
| |
| |
|
| oe
|
| _
| QO
if a
Zz
| a
| Zz
=
i ies]
| mm
| ma
|
|
i |
\
1
|
|
|
|
|
i
|
|
|
i
|
1
|
i i
i |
|
j |
| { /
36°30 ,
76°00" 38°30" |
. . . . . . . oe . 77° 008 | ,
SYMBOLOGY . |
*K ROCK |
LOW WATER |
| _
|

NATIONAL OCEAN SERVICE
HYDROGRAPHIC SURVEY INDEX

DEPTH
GRADIENTS,
Meters Feet.
° °

65.

BATHYMETRIC CONTOUR INTERVAL e@ METERS

WITH SUPPLEMENTARY 1 METER CONTOURS |
DATUM IS MEAN LOW WATER |

. | {

oS

20

Maximum Depth

(WASHINGTON NW, MD-DC.1. | | |
aa PRELIMINARY | PY

COPY , |
Sarny TT : £ 4 q F/O7 f VASHING TODAS IVE. a

— |

=

“)
A
Subpart 3011.6 [Reserved]

Parent topic: PART 3011—DESCRIBING AGENCY NEEDS
Exhibit No. 32.5   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with this report of Questar Gas Company (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Ronald W. Jibson, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  QUESTAR GAS COMPANY   May 6, 2011 /s/Ronald W. Jibson Ronald W. Jibson President and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 31.1.  CERTIFICATION  I, R. Allan Bradley, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this report of Questar Pipeline Company on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended June 30, 2008;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. [intentionally omitted];  4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and we have:  a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;  c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting.  5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):  a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.    November 6, 2008 /s/R. Allan Bradley R. Allan Bradley President and Chief Executive Officer
#### Gem Knitting Mills *v.*Thurman.

Eish, C. J.

1. In an action by an officer of a corporation for salary alleged to be due him, where the defendant corporation pleaded that no corporate action had ever been taken fixing any salary for the plaintiff during the time for which he claimed it, the court did not err, on the trial of the case, in excluding evidence, offered by the corporation to the effect that no- salary had been fixed or paid to the plaintiff’s predecessor.

2. Where the defendant also pleaded accord and satisfaction and offered in evidence a written instrument purporting to be an agreement whereby all differences and contentions between plaintiff and defendant (the terms being sufficiently broad to include the claim for salary by plaintiff) were adjusted and satisfied prior to the instituting of the suit, which writing, however, was never signed by the plaintiff, but where there was evidence tending to show that he accepted and acted upon *16such agreement, and that all of its terms were carried out both by himself and by the defendant, the court erred in refusing to permit the writing to go in evidence, although plaintiff testified that he never accepted it nor carried it out. See *Kidd*v. *Huff,*105 *Ga.*209 (2), 212 (31 S. E. 430); *Goldsmith*v. *Marcus,*7 *Ga. App.*849 (68 S. E. 462).

May 14, 1913.

Complaint. Before Judge Daniel. Pike superior court. February 10, 1912.-

*Hardeman, Jones, Park & Johnston*and *E. F. Dupree,*for plain-

tiff in error, *J. F. Bedding*and *H. 0. Farr,*contra.

*Judgment reversed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
228 So.2d 312

#### STATE of Louisiana v. Francis Noel HINES.

No. 50217.

Dec. 2, 1969.

In re: Francis Noel Hines applying for writs of mandamus, prohibition and a speedy trial.

Writs refused. The showing made in the application is insufficient to warrant the exercise of either our original or supervisory jurisdiction.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

RUSSELL E. GARNER, *

*

Plaintiff, *

*

vs. * CASE NUMBER: 01:06cv781-MHT

*

PROGRESSIVE DIRECT INSURANCE*

COMPANY, *

*

 Defendant. *

DEFENDANT PROGRESSIVE DIRECT INSURANCE COMPANY’S WITNESS LIST

COMES NOW Defendant, Progressive Direct Insurance Company, and does hereby reserve

the right to call the following witnesses at the trial of this matter:

1. Russell E. Garner (expected to testify)

888 Will Logan Road

Ozark, Alabama 36360

334-237-3071

2. Cindy R. Greene (expected to testify)

347 County Road 401

Ozark, Alabama 36360

334-774-7422

3. Trooper James W. Davis (expected to testify)

Alabama Department of Public Safety

Dothan Post

334-983-4587

4. Juan G. P. Haddock (expected to testify)

705 Whittle Hudson Road

Ozark, Alabama 36360

334-774-0712

5. Any witnesses identified in subsequent discovery.

6. Any witness necessary for impeachment or rebuttal after presentation of Plaintiff’s

Case 1:06-cv-00781-MHT-TFM Document 23 Filed 03/09/2007 Page 1 of 2
case.

7. Any witness necessary for the authentication of documents.

8. Any witness identified by the Plaintiff on his witness list.

9. Defendant respectfully reserves the right to amend this witness list as needed.

s/Alex L. Holtsford, Jr. 

Alex L. Holtsford, Jr. (HOL048)

Jeffrey G. Hunter (HUN028)

Attorneys for Defendant Progressive Direct Insurance

Company

OF COUNSEL:

NIX HOLTSFORD GILLILAND

HIGGINS & HITSON, P.C.

Post Office Box 4128

Montgomery, Alabama 36103-4128

(334) 215-8585 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that I have this day mailed, postage prepaid, an exact copy of the foregoing

document to:

David W. Rousseau

211 W. Adams Street

Dothan, Alabama 36303

This the 9 day of March, 2007. th

s/Alex L. Holtsford, Jr. 

OF COUNSEL

Case 1:06-cv-00781-MHT-TFM Document 23 Filed 03/09/2007 Page 2 of 2
2811.002 Policy.       (a) Consistent with the policy expressed in FAR 11.002(b), the metric system is the preferred system of weights and measures and shall be used in DOJ solicitations and contracts.          (b) When acquiring products or services, the requirements of FAR 11.002(d)          (1)  			and DOJ sustainability policies and procedures are to be followed.    **Parent topic:** PART 2811 - DESCRIBING AGENCY NEEDS
# SUBCHAPTER C - CONTRACTING METHODS AND CONTRACT TYPES

- PART 2813 - SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION PROCEDURES 
- PART 2814 - SEALED BIDDING 
- PART 2815 - CONTRACTING BY NEGOTIATION 
- PART 2816 - TYPES OF CONTRACTS 
- PART 2817 - SPECIAL CONTRACTING METHODS 

- PART 2813 - SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION PROCEDURES          - Subpart 2813.2 - Actions at or Below the Micro-Purchase Threshold     - 2813.201   General.
  - Subpart 2813.3 - Simplified Acquisition Methods     - 2813.305   Imprest funds and third party drafts.
    - 2813.307   Forms.
  - Subpart 2813.4 - Fast Payment Procedure     - 2813.401   General.
  - Subpart 2813.70 - Certified Invoice Procedure     - 2813.70-1   Policy.
    - 2813.70-2   Procedures.
- PART 2814 - SEALED BIDDING          - Subpart 2814.4 - Opening of Bids and Award of Contract     - 2814.404   Rejection of bids.
    - 2814.404-1   Cancellation of invitations after opening.
    - 2814.407   Mistakes in bids.
    - 2814.407-3   Other mistakes disclosed before award.
    - 2814.407-4   Mistakes after award.
- PART 2815 - CONTRACTING BY NEGOTIATION          - Subpart 2815.2 - Solicitation and Receipt of Proposals and Information     - 2815.204   Contract format.
  - Subpart 2815.3 - Source Selection     - 2815.303   Responsibilities.
  - Subpart 2815.4 - Contract Pricing     - 2815.404   Proposal analysis.
    - 2815.404-2   Data to support proposal analysis.
  - Subpart 2815.6 - Unsolicited Proposals     - 2815.604   Agency points of contact.
    - 2815.605   Content of unsolicited proposals.
    - 2815.606   Agency procedures.
- PART 2816 - TYPES OF CONTRACTS          - Subpart 2816.2 - Fixed-Price Contracts     - 2816.207   Firm-fixed-price, level-of-effort term contracts.
    - 2816.207-3   Limitations.
  - Subpart 2816.5 - Indefinite-Delivery Contracts     - 2816.505   Ordering.
  - Subpart 2816.6 - Time-and-Materials, Labor-Hour, and Letter Contracts     - 2816.601   Time-and-materials contracts.
    - 2816.602   Labor-hour contracts.
- PART 2817 - SPECIAL CONTRACTING METHODS          - Subpart 2817.1 - Multiyear Contracting     - 2817.104   General.
  - Subpart 2817.2 - Options     - 2817.204   Contracts.
  - Subpart 2817.6 - Management and Operating Contracts     - 2817.602   Policy.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6651

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

REGINALD DAVIS, a/k/a Sinbad, a/k/a Reggie,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge.

(CR-93-25, CA-97-382-R)

Submitted: November 17, 1998 Decided: February 10, 1999

Before WILLIAMS and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Reginald Davis, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Jack Bondurant, Jr.,

Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Reginald Davis seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 &

Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning

of the district court. United States v. Davis, Nos. CR-93-25; CA97-382-R (W.D. Va. Apr. 7, 1998). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED
IV 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 329

Honoring former President William Jefferson Clinton on the occasion of 

his 59th birthday. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 17, 2005

Mrs. MALONEY (for herself, Mrs. LOWEY, Mr. ROSS, Mr. BACA, Mr. BRADY

of Pennsylvania, Ms. CARSON, Mrs. CHRISTENSEN, Mr. CONYERS, Mr. 

CROWLEY, Mr. GRIJALVA, Mr. HASTINGS of Florida, Mr. HINCHEY, Mr. 

HONDA, Mr. ISRAEL, Ms. EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON of Texas, Mrs. 

JONES of Ohio, Mr. KANJORSKI, Mr. LANTOS, Mrs. MCCARTHY, Ms. 

MCCOLLUM of Minnesota, Mr. MCDERMOTT, Mr. MCGOVERN, Ms. MATSUI, Mr. MEEKS of New York, Mr. GEORGE MILLER of California, Mr. 

MOORE of Kansas, Mr. MORAN of Virginia, Mrs. NAPOLITANO, Mr. 

PAYNE, Mr. SCOTT of Georgia, Mr. STRICKLAND, Mr. VAN HOLLEN, and 

Ms. WATSON) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 

the Committee on Government Reform 

RESOLUTION

Honoring former President William Jefferson Clinton on the 

occasion of his 59th birthday.

Whereas former President William Jefferson Clinton was 

born in Hope, Arkansas, on August 19, 1946; 

Whereas William Jefferson Clinton attended Georgetown University as an undergraduate and received a Rhodes Scholarship in 1968; 

Whereas William Jefferson Clinton received a law degree 

from Yale University in 1973; 
2

•HRES 329 IH 

Whereas William Jefferson Clinton established a record of 

public service as Attorney General of Arkansas, Governor 

of Arkansas, and Chairman of the National Governors 

Association; 

Whereas William Jefferson Clinton campaigned for and won 

the Democratic nomination for President in 1992; 

Whereas William Jefferson Clinton was elected the 42d President of the United States in 1992 and was reelected for 

a second term in 1996; 

Whereas during William Jefferson Clinton’s time in office the 

United States experienced 8 years of economic expansion, 

job growth, and the transformation of a budget deficit 

into a budget surplus; 

Whereas William Jefferson Clinton rallied the members of the 

North Atlantic Treaty Organization to put an end to ethnic cleansing in the Balkans and to depose the murderous regime of Slobodan Milosevic, actions which eventually led to the signing of the Dayton Peace Accords; 

Whereas William Jefferson Clinton played a major role in the 

Good Friday Peace Accords which finally brought peace 

to war-torn Northern Ireland; 

Whereas William Jefferson Clinton and former President 

George H. W. Bush were appointed to lead the United 

States effort to provide private aid to the victims of the 

devastating tsunami that struck southeast Asia on December 26, 2004; and 

Whereas, in the words of President George W. Bush, William 

Jefferson Clinton ‘‘showed a deep and far-ranging knowledge of public policy, a great compassion for people in 

need, and the forward-looking spirit the Americans like 

in a President’’: Now, therefore, be it
3

•HRES 329 IH 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives honors 

2 former President William Jefferson Clinton on the occa3 sion of his 59th birthday on August 19, 2005, and extends 

4 best wishes to him and his family.

Æ
223 So.2d 672

#### STATE of Louisiana v. Donald JOUBERT.

No. 49931.

June 26, 1969.

In re: Donald Joubert applying for writ of certiorari.

Writ refused. The showing made in the application does not warrant the relief sought.
Subpart 1529.3 - State and Local Taxes

Parent topic: PART 1529 - TAXES

1529.303 Application of State and local taxes to Government

contractors and subcontractors.

Contractors are responsible for determining the availability of State and local tax exemptions and

obtaining such exemptions, if available, unless the Contracting Officer determines under FAR

31.205-41(b)(3) that the administrative burden outweighs the corresponding benefit. Contractors

are responsible for ensuring that subcontractors also seek and obtain such exemptions, if available.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 346 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                         July 13, 2005.
    Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker 
may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XVIII, declare the House resolved into the 
Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of the 
bill (H.R. 2864) to provide for the conservation and development of water and 
related resources, to authorize the Secretary of the Army to construct various 
projects for improvements to rivers and harbors of the United States, and for 
other purposes. The first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. All 
points of order against consideration of the bill are waived. General debate 
shall be confined to the bill and shall not exceed one hour equally divided and 
controlled by the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on 
Transportation and Infrastructure. After general debate the bill shall be 
considered for amendment under the five-minute rule. It shall be in order to 
consider as an original bill for the purpose of amendment under the five-minute 
rule the amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on 
Transportation and Infrastructure now printed in the bill. The committee 
amendment in the nature of a substitute shall be considered as read. All points 
of order against the committee amendment in the nature of a substitute are 
waived. Notwithstanding clause 11 of rule XVIII, no amendment to the committee 
amendment in the nature of a substitute shall be in order except those printed 
in the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution. Each such 
amendment may be offered only in the order printed in the report, may be offered 
only by a Member designated in the report, shall be considered as read, shall be 
debatable for the time specified in the report equally divided and controlled by 
the proponent and an opponent, shall not be subject to amendment, and shall not 
be subject to a demand for division of the question in the House or in the 
Committee of the Whole. All points of order against such amendments are waived. 
At the conclusion of consideration of the bill for amendment the Committee shall 
rise and report the bill to the House with such amendments as may have been 
adopted. Any Member may demand a separate vote in the House on any amendment 
adopted in the Committee of the Whole to the bill or to the committee amendment 
in the nature of a substitute. The previous question shall be considered as 
ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to final passage without intervening 
motion except one motion to recommit with or without instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```