alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[109th Congress Public Law 319]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ319.109]

[[Page 120 STAT. 1746]]

Public Law 109-319
109th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to study the suitability and 
  feasibility of designating portions of Ste. Genevieve County in the 
 State of Missouri as a unit of the National Park System, and for other 
            purposes. <<NOTE: Oct. 11, 2006 -  [H.R. 1728]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress <<NOTE: Ste. Genevieve County 
National Historic Site Study Act of 2005. Conservation.>> assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Ste. Genevieve County National 
Historic Site Study Act of 2005''.

SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS.

    In this Act:
            (1) Area.--The term ``Area'' means Ste. Genevieve County, 
        Missouri, which includes the Bequette-Ribault, St. Gemme-
        Amoureaux, and Wilhauk homes, and the related and supporting 
        historical assets located in Ste. Genevieve County, Missouri.
            (2) Secretary.--The term ``Secretary'' means the Secretary 
        of the Interior, acting through the Director of the National 
        Park Service.

SEC. 3. STUDY.

    (a) In General.--Not <<NOTE: Deadline.>> later than 3 years after 
the date on which funds are made available to carry out this Act, the 
Secretary shall, in consultation with the State of Missouri--
            (1) complete a study on the suitability and feasibility of 
        designating the Area as a unit of the National Park System, 
        which shall include the potential impact that designation of the 
        area as a unit of the National Park System is likely to have on 
        land within the proposed area or bordering the proposed area 
        that is privately owned at the time that the study is conducted; 
        and
            (2) <<NOTE: Reports.>> submit to the Committee on Resources 
        of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Energy and 
        Natural Resources of the Senate a report describing the findings 
        of the study.

[[Page 120 STAT. 1747]]

    (b) Contents.--The study under subsection (a) shall be conducted in 
accordance with Public Law 91-383 (16 U.S.C. 1a-1 et seq.).

    Approved October 11, 2006.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 1728:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 109-338 (Comm. on Resources).
SENATE REPORTS: No. 109-246 (Comm. on Energy and Natural Resources).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 152 (2006):
            Feb. 28, considered and passed House.
            Sept. 29, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
#### Jefferson L. Hewitt, Respondent, v. Town of Scipio et al., Appellants.

Judgment unanimously reversed on the law and facts, without • costs, and complaint dismissed. Memorandum: In 1956 plaintiff became the record owner of a strip of land 49.5 feet wide running west from the west side of Owaseo Lake to land owned by the Lehigh Valley Railroad. The warranty deed described the premises as “the fee to a three rod public highway leading from the Lehigh Valley Railroad Company’s land easterly to Owaseo Lake * # * subject however, to the rights of the public for so long as it .uses the same as a public highway”. The highway was laid out in 1875. Plaintiff contends that the town failed to maintain and service the road during at least six years immediately prior to the trial and that the highway has been abandoned. Although not serviced by the town, the highway had a hard, gravel surface which had been used repeatedly and regularly for many years up to the time of trial without obtaining permission from anyone. The public has traveled over the disputed area in the summertime by vehicles and on foot for the purpose of reaching the shore to swim, fish, picnic, draw water in dry seasons and load commodities on boats for transportation to campsites along the lakeshore not otherwise conveniently accessible; vehicles have regularly been parked along a fence on the north line of the highway and on the entire area. When plaintiff" conveyed property immediately adjacent to the disputed area on the north in 1963 the deed description referred to “ the northerly margin of a public highway” as the starting point of the property conveyed, and the grantee has consistently used the road as the only means of ingress and egress to and from his property without being granted an easement or right of way. The town never filed a certificate of abandonment of the road. It appears that the road is the only way the public can get to the lake and is considered most important for fire protection. Finally, the public has had no difficulty in getting in and out of the area; it was never obstructed or barricaded by plaintiff and no. complaint was ever made to the town in the years immediately preceding the trial concerning the condition of the highway. Once a highway, always a highway, until the contrary is shown, and the contrary is not shown by the fact the town failed to service it. *(Matter of Scheibel*v. *O’Brien,*230 N. Y. 277, 281; *City of Cohoes*v. *President, etc. Delaware & Hudson Canal Co.,*134 N. Y. 397, 407; *Smith*v. *Town of Sandy Creek,*12 Misc 2d 916, affd. 8 A D 2d 688, mot. for lv. to app. den. 7 N Y 2d 707.) Furthermore, upon the record plaintiff has failed to sustain the burden of proving that the disputed area had been abandoned by nonuser. The fact that the highway might have been obstructed across part of its width, narrowing but not closing the line of travel, did not work an extinguishment of the right of way. *(Mangam*v. *Village of Sing Sing,*26 App. Div. 464, affd. 164 N. Y . 560.) (Appeal from judgment of Cayuga Trial Term, in action to enjoin trespass.) Present—Del Veeehio, J. P., Marsh, Gabrielli, Bastow and Henry, JJ.
§ 1040.89-6 Mediation. ( a ) *Referral of complaints for mediation.* DOE will refer to the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service, in accordance with 45 CFR 90.43(c)(3), all complaints that: ( 1 ) Fall within the jurisdiction of the Act and these regulations; and
( 2 ) Contain all information necessary for further processing.
( b ) Both the complainant and the recipient shall participate in the mediation process to the extent necessary to reach an agreement or make an informed judgment that an agreement is not possible. There must be at least one meeting with the mediator before the Director, Office of Civil Rights and Diversity, will accept a judgment that an agreement is not possible. However, the recipient and the complainant need not meet with the mediator at the same time.
( c ) If the complainant and the recipient reach an agreement, the mediator shall prepare a written statement of the agreement and have the complainant and the recipient sign it. The mediator shall send a copy of the agreement to the Director, Office of Civil Rights and Diversity, DOE. DOE will take no further action on the complaint unless the complainant or the recipient fails to comply with the agreement.
( d ) DOE will use the mediation process for a maximum of 60 days after referring a complaint to mediation. Mediation ends if: ( 1 ) 60 days elapse from the time the mediation agency receives the complaint; or
( 2 ) Prior to the end of the 60 day mediation period, an agreement is reached; or
( 3 ) Prior to the end of that 60 day mediation period, the mediator determines that an agreement cannot be reached.
( e ) The mediator shall return unresolved complaints to the Director, Office of Civil Rights and Diversity, DOE.
[50 FR 8089, Feb. 27, 1985, as amended at 68 FR 51348, Aug. 26, 2003]
**Page 1** 



### IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

**Supreme Court Cause No. DA -**  **24 -**  **0126 MEL COOK, LOEY KNAPP, JAMES WALTERS, DAVID MCKINLEY,**  **SUSAN EVANS, PAT GRONINGER, TERRI GRONINGER,** Appellee, vs. **BERTA’S FARM, LLC,** a Montana Limited Liability Company, Appellant. On Appeal from the Montana Twenty - First Judicial District Court Ravalli County, Cause No. DV -41 - 2017 - 0000455 - OC

Before Hon. Jennifer B. Lint

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- **O RDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION**  **TO DISMISS** Upon the Unopposed Motion of Defendant/ Appell ant Berta’s Farm, LLC to dismiss the above - entitled matter, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this matter is hereby Dismis s e d . **DATED AND ELECTRONICALLY SIGNED BELOW.** 

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 28 2024

08/28/2024

Case Number: DA 24-0126
exv10waa









			
	Note: This exhibit has been re-filed to correct a typographical error.
	 	EXHIBIT 10AA






Memo




	 	 	 
	Date:

	 	April 24, 2009
	 
	 	 
	To:

	 	Eric Ceyrolle
	 
	 	 
	From:

	 	Dick Morin
	 
	 	 
	RE:

	 	Separation from Cognex





The following summarizes our agreement regarding the compensation and related benefits to be
paid to you in connection with your separation from Cognex Corporation and its affiliate, Cognex
International, Inc. The payment of such amounts shall be made in accordance with applicable
French and U.S. law and in such manner as we may otherwise agree.





	 	•	 	You will receive your gross monthly salary (17,578 Euros) through July 15, 2009 (the
“Termination Date”) and on the usual payment dates.
	 
	 	•	 	You will receive payment of any outstanding vacation days accrued but not taken up to
the Termination Date (subject to social contributions).
	 
	 	•	 	You will receive an additional payment of 182,617 Euros on the Termination Date in
settlement of your rights under French law.
	 
	 	•	 	You will be entitled to receive up to a total maximum amount of 9,375 Euros to cover
(upon presentation of related receipts) reasonable and customary costs incurred by you to
prepare your tax documents for 2009.
	 
	 	•	 	Cognex will pay to your current French “mutuelle” health insurance the greater of (a)
the employer and employee contributions due until the end of 2009 and (b) the amount
required of us by French law.
	 
	 	•	 	You will be entitled to the reimbursement of customary professional expenses incurred by
you prior to the Termination Date in accordance with our policies and procedures.
#### § 945.86 Duration of immunities.

The benefits, privileges, and immunities conferred upon any person by virtue of this subpart shall cease upon the termination of this subpart, except with respect to acts done under and during the existence of this subpart.
|WELLS FARGO(logo) | Commercial
Mortgage ServicingD1050-084, 8th Floor401 South Tryon St.Charlotte,
NC 282021-800-326-1334
|----------------- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE



Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of November 1, 2012, by
and among GS Mortgage Securities Corporation II, as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, Rialto
Capital Advisors, LLC, as Special Servicer, Pentalpha Surveillance LLC, as Operating Advisor and U.S. Bank National Association
as Certificate Administrator and Trustee, with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2012-GCJ9 (the “Agreement”).
Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.



Pursuant to Section 10.08 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial Mortgage
Services do hereby certify that:



|1. |  | A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from January 1, 2016 through December
31, 2016 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has been made under
my supervision, and
|-- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
|2. |  | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations
under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.                                                       



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of
the 28th day of February 2017.



|/s/ Daniel Bober         | 
|------------------------ | 
|Daniel Bober             | 
|Executive Vice President | 
|Wells Fargo Bank         | 



|Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | Together we’ll go far
|---------------------- | ---------------------
Case 2:06-cv-00735-MHT-CSC Document 54 Filed 12/17/2007 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Techdyne, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David
L. Watts, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

                  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

                  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
the Company.

                                        /s/ David L. Watts
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        David L. Watts
                                        Chief Financial Officer

May 15, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to Techdyne, Inc., and will be
retained by Techdyne, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
**EXHIBIT 32.2CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

       In connection with the quarterlyreport of CNB Corporation on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2009 asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, L.Ford Sanders, II, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of CNBCorporation, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002that:
| 1.     | The  above-listed Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)  or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                 |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                         |
| 2.     | The  information contained in the above-listed Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all  material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the  Company. |
| Date:  August  13, 2009 | /s/L. Ford Sanders, II                                                              L. Ford Sanders,  II  Executive Vice President, Treasurer, and Chief Financial Officer |
|-----------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  |
§ 760.301 Applicability. ( a ) This subpart establishes the terms and conditions under which the Livestock Forage Disaster Program (LFP) will be administered.
( b ) Eligible livestock producers will be compensated for eligible grazing losses for covered livestock that occur due to a qualifying drought or fire that occurs: ( 1 ) On or after January 1, 2008, and before October 1, 2011, and
( 2 ) In the calendar year for which benefits are being requested.
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Sheila Deitchman, Appellant. Martin P. Catherwood, as Industrial Commissioner, Respondent.

Cooke, J.

Appeal from a" decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed July 23, 1969, which determined claimant to be ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits effective January 6, 1969 on the ground that she could not accrue any effective days in any statutory week. Claimant, a young bookkeeper, worked full time until a point in 1966 and, in February of 1967, had a child. She resumed employment about a year thereafter, working no more than three days a week because of various problems related to her son and losing her job because the employer needed full time assistance. Unemployment insuranee benefits shall be paid “ for each accumulation of effective *719days within a week” (Labor Law, § 590, subd. 3), an “effective day” being defined as “ a full day of total unemployment provided such day falls within a week in which a claimant had four or more days of total unemployment and provided further that only those days of total unemployment in excess of three days within such week are deemed *‘*effective days ’ ” (Labor Law, ¡§ 523). Subdivision 2 of section 591 of the Labor Law provides that no benefits are payable to any claimant “ who is not ready, willing and able to work ”, The board’s determination of ineligibility and its construction and application of the term “ effective days ” should be upheld by the court, since they have a “ warrant in the record ” and a “ reasonable basis in law ” (cf. *Matter of Marsh*[Gatherwood], 13 H Y 2d 235, 239). Decision affirmed, without costs. Herlihy, P. J., Reynolds, Staley, Jr., Cooke and Sweeney, JJ., concur in memorandum by Cooke, J.
Case 2:06-cv-00731-MHT-SRW Document 2 Filed 08/14/2006 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:06-cv-00731-MHT-SRW Document 2 Filed 08/14/2006 Page 2 of 2
#### Taylor *v.*Bank of Tifton.

May 15, 1913.

Claim. Before Judge Thomas. Tift superior court. April 14, 1912.

. *J. S. Bidgdill, C. G. Hall, J. H. Price,*and *B. Eve,*for 'plaintiff in error. *B. D. Smith,*contra.

Hill, J.

This is a companion case to that of *Taylor*v. *Brown & Co.,*139 *Ga.*797 (77 S. E. 1062), in which the facts and assignments of error are the same; and the rulings made in that case are controlling in this.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
#### § 915.43 Contributions.

The committee may accept voluntary contributions. Such contributions shall be free from any encumbrances by the donor and the committee shall retain complete control of their use.

[73 FR 6837, Feb. 6, 2008]
§ 19.40 Criminal penalties. ( a ) Section 223 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, provides for criminal sanctions for willful violation of, attempted violation of, or conspiracy to violate, any regulation issued under sections 161b, 161i, or 161o of the Act. For purposes of section 223, all the regulations in part 19 are issued under one or more of sections 161b, 161i, or 161o, except for the sections listed in paragraph (b) of this section.
( b ) The regulations in part 19 that are not issued under sections 161b, 161i, or 161o for the purposes of section 223 are as follows: §§ 19.1, 19.2, 19.3, 19.4, 19.5, 19.8, 19.16, 19.17, 19.18, 19.30, 19.31, and 19.40.
[57 FR 55071, Nov. 24, 1992]
§ 917.62 Proceedings after termination. ( a ) Upon the termination of the provisions of this part pertaining to any fruit or fruits, the Control Committee then functioning shall for the purpose of liquidating the affairs of the Control Committee with respect to such fruit continue as trustee of all the funds and property then in its possession, or under its control, including claims for any funds unpaid or property not delivered at the time of such termination.
( b ) The said trustees shall ( 1 ) continue in such capacity until discharged by the Secretary;
( 2 ) from time to time account for all receipts and disbursements and deliver all property on hand, together with all books and records of the committee and of the trustees, to such persons as the Secretary may direct; and
( 3 ) upon the request of the Secretary, execute such assignments or other instruments necessary or appropriate to vest in such person, full title and right to all funds, property, and claims vested in the Control Committee or the trustees pursuant thereto.
( c ) Any person to whom funds, property, or claims have been transferred or delivered, pursuant to this section, shall be subject to the same obligation imposed upon the Control Committee and upon the trustees.
Effective Date Note
Effective Date Note: At 76 FR 66605, Oct. 27, 2011, § 917.62 was suspended indefinitely, effective Oct. 28, 2011.
713.000 Scope of part.

The simplified acquisition threshold applies to the cost of supplies and services, exclusive of the cost

of transportation and other accessorial costs if their destination is outside the United States.

Parent topic: PART 713—SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION PROCEDURES