alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

 v. )

)

SEBASTIAN K. SMITH, JR. ) CR. NO. 2:06CR00205-WHA

O R D E R

The defendant by consent has appeared before a United States Magistrate Judge and has

entered a plea of guilty. The Magistrate Judge has accepted the plea of guilty and has adjudicated

the defendant guilty. Accordingly, it is ORDERED as follows:

1. That sentencing of the defendant be, and the same is, hereby set on February 1, 2007

at 9:00 a.m. in the Frank M. Johnson, Jr. United States Courthouse Complex, One Church Street,

Montgomery, Alabama.

2. That in accordance with Rule 32(f)(1), Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, on or

before January 2, 2007, counsel for the defendant and the Government shall communicate in

writing to the probation officer, and to each other, any objections they have as to any material

information, sentencing classifications, sentencing guideline ranges, and policy statements contained

in or omitted from the presentence report.

3. That, unless excused in writing by the Chief U.S. Probation Officer of this district,

counsel for the parties shall be available for a conference with the probation officer on January 4,

2007 at 9:30 a.m., to discuss and resolve, if possible, factual and legal issues contained in the

presentence report. If the probation officer determines or if any of the parties request that a personal

meeting be held to resolve the issues, such meeting shall be at the U.S. Probation Office, One

Court Square, Suite 249, Montgomery, AL, on the above date and time. Such request for a

personal conference shall be made to the probation officer within five (5) calendar days after receipt

of the presentence report. Otherwise, the conference shall be held telephonically. Any motion for

downward departure shall be filed on or before the conference date with the probation officer,

unless based on unknown and unforeseen circumstances arising after that date, in which case

the motion must be filed promptly upon discovery of such circumstances.

Nothing contained in this Order shall be construed as impairing the rights of any party as

established in the Constitution or laws of the United States.

DONE this 11th day of October , 2006.

 /s/ W. Harold Albritton 

 Senior United States District Judge

Case 2:06-cr-00205-WHA-CSC Document 35 Filed 10/11/2006 Page 1 of 1
§ 1800.12 Procedures for declaring a state eligible for membership in the Compact. ( a ) Any state seeking to become an eligible state under the Compact shall submit to the Chairman of the Commission six copies of a petition to become an eligible state. The petition shall discuss each of the conditions specified in § 1800.13 and shall: ( 1 ) Affirm that the petitioning state fully satisfies each condition; or
( 2 ) Explain why the petitioning state does not or cannot fully satisfy any particular condition.
( b ) Upon receipt of a petition from any state seeking to become an eligible state under the Compact, the Commission shall publish a notice in accordance with Article I.F.1. of the By Laws and shall initiate an adjudicatory proceeding to act on the petition. Any person may submit written comments on a petition, and all such comments must be received by the Commission within 30 days of notice that a petition has been submitted.
( c ) The Commission shall evaluate the petition against the conditions for declaration of an eligible state specified in § 1800.13. As part of the proceeding to evaluate a petition to become an eligible state, the Commission may, in its discretion, conduct a hearing pursuant to Article IV.i.(6) of the Compact and Article V.F.1. of the Commission's By-Laws. For good cause shown, the Commission may issue an order shortening the notice period for hearings provided in Article I.F.1. of the By Laws to a period of not less than ten days.
( d ) After review of the petition and after any hearing, if held, the Commission shall issue an order accepting or rejecting the petition or accepting the petition with conditions. If the Commission accepts the petition without conditions, the petitioning state shall be declared an eligible state and shall become a new party state upon passage of the Compact by its state legislature, repeal of all statutes or statutory provisions that pose unreasonable impediments to the capability of the state to satisfy the conditions for eligibility (as determined by the Commission) and payment of (or arrangement to pay) the fee specified in Article IV.j.(1). If the Commission accepts the petition with conditions, the petitioning state may become an eligible state by satisfying all of the conditions in the Commission's order and providing an amended petition incorporating its compliance with all of the conditions in this subpart and in the Commission's order. The Commission will consider the amended petition as part of the original adjudicatory proceeding and will issue a new order accepting or rejecting the amended petition.
( e ) A state that submits a petition for declaration as an eligible state that is rejected by the Commission may submit a new petition at any time. The Commission will consider the new petition without reference to the prior petition but may use evidence obtained in any prior proceeding to evaluate the new petition.
( f ) The Commission's consideration of a petition for declaration of an eligible state shall be governed by the Compact, the Commission's By Laws, and this part.
§ 1040.73 New construction. ( a ) *Design and construction.* Each facility or part of a facility constructed by, on behalf of, or for the use of a recipient is to be designed and constructed in a manner that the facility or part of the facility is readily accessible to, and useable by, handicapped persons, if the construction was commenced after the effective date of this subpart.
( b ) *Alteration.* Each facility or part of a facility which is altered by, on behalf of, or for the use of a recipient after the effective date of this subpart in a manner that affects or could affect the usability of the facility or part of the facility is, to the maximum extent feasible, to be altered in a manner that the altered portion of the facility is readily accessible to and useable by handicapped persons.
( c ) *Conformance with Uniform Federal Accessibility Standards.* ( 1 ) Effective as of January 18, 1991, design, construction, or alteration of buildings in conformance with sections 3-8 of the Uniform Federal Accessibility Standards (USAF) (appendix A to 41 CFR subpart 101-19.6) shall be deemed to comply with the requirements of this section with respect to those buildings. Departures from particular technical and scoping requirements of UFAS by the use of other methods are permitted where substantially equivalent or greater access to and usability of the building is provided.
( 2 ) For purposes of this section, section 4.1.6(1)(g) of UFAS shall be interpreted to exempt from the requirements of UFAS only mechanical rooms and other spaces that, because of their intended use, will not require accessibility to the public or beneficiaries or result in the employment or residence therein of persons with physical handicaps.
( 3 ) This section does not require recipients to make building alterations that have little likelihood of being accomplished without removing or altering a load-bearing structural member.
[45 FR 40515, June 13, 1980, as amended at 55 FR 52138, 52140, Dec. 19, 1990]
**Exhibit31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, James W. Dolan, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of MAI SystemsCorporation;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisquarterly report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and wehave:

 

a)     designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this quarterly report is being prepared;

 

b)    evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as ofa date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the “EvaluationDate”); and

 

c)     presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluationas of the Evaluation Date;

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent function):

 

a)     allsignificant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls whichcould adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarizeand report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors anymaterial weaknesses in internal controls; and

 

b)    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves managementor other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrols; and

 

6. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have indicated inthis quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internalcontrols or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controlssubsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any correctiveactions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

 
|   | Date:  November 18, 2004 |                                  |
|--------|-------------------------------|---------------------------------------|
|   | By:                           | /s/ James W. Dolan                    |
|   |                          | James W. Dolan                        |
|   |                          | Chief Financial and Operating Officer |

 

1

----
Editorial Note on Part 40
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 40 appear at 79 FR 75740, Dec. 19, 2014.

§ 40.63 Tests. Each licensee shall perform, or permit the Commission to perform, such tests as the Commission deems appropriate or necessary for the administration of the regulations in this part, including tests of: ( a ) Source or byproduct material;
( b ) Facilities wherein source or byproduct material is utilized or stored;
( c ) Radiation detection and monitoring instruments; and
( d ) Other equipment and devices used in connection with the utilization and storage of source or byproduct material.
[45 FR 65533, Oct. 3, 1980]
Editorial Note on Part 34
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 34 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

§ 34.123 Criminal penalties. ( a ) Section 223 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1952, as amended, provides for criminal sanctions for willful violation of, attempted violation of, or conspiracy to violate, any regulation issued under one or more of §§ 161b, 161i, or 161o of the Act. For purposes of Section 223, all the regulations in 10 CFR part 34 are issued under one or more of §§ 161b, 161i, or 161o, except for the sections listed in paragraph (b) of this section.
( b ) The regulations in 10 CFR part 34 that are not issued under sections 161b, 161i, or 161o for the purposes of Section 223 are as follows: §§ 34.1, 34.3, 34.5, 34.8, 34.11, 34.13, 34.111, 34.121, 34.123.
Case 2:06-cv-00667-WKW-WC Document 22 Filed 11/13/2006 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:06-cv-00667-WKW-WC Document 22 Filed 11/13/2006 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:06-cv-00667-WKW-WC Document 22 Filed 11/13/2006 Page 3 of 3
#### § 1016.32 Violations.

An injunction or other court order may be obtained prohibiting any violation of any provision of the Act or any regulation or order issued thereunder. Any person who willfully violates, attempts to violate, or conspires to violate any provision of the Act or any regulation or order issued thereunder, including the provisions of this part, may be guilty of a crime and upon conviction may be punished by fine or imprisonment, or both, as provided by law.

[48 FR 36432, Aug. 10, 1983. Redesignated at 82 FR 41508, Sept. 1, 2017]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

OFFICE OF THE CLERK

POST OFFICE BOX 711

MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA 36101-0711

DEBRA P. HACKETT, CLERK

TELEPHONE (334) 954-3600

March 6, 2007

NOTICE OF NON-COMPLIANCE

To: ALL COUNSEL OF RECORD

Case Style: Russell E. Garner v. Progressive Direct Insurance Company

Case Number: #1:06-cv-00781-MHT

Referenced Pleading: Notices 

Docket Entry Number: #15 - Notice of Deposition

 #16 - Notice of Deposition

 #17 - Notice of Filing Discovery

 #18 - Notice of Filing Discovery

The referenced pleadings were electronically filed on 3/5/2007 in this case and are not in

compliance with the local rules and/or administrative procedures of this court. 

******These pleadings are discovery and are not allowed pursuant to Local Rule 5.1 NONFILING OF CIVIL DISCOVERY.

The pleadings are hereby STRICKEN from the record and the parties are instructed to

disregard the entry of these pleadings on the court’s docket. Parties should be aware that the

striking of these entries does not affect their responsibilities as to the discovery process.

Case 1:06-cv-00781-MHT-TFM Document 20 Filed 03/06/2007 Page 1 of 1
No. 89-6741.

#### Jackson *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Subpart 1831.2—Contracts with Commercial

Organizations

Parent topic: PART 1831—CONTRACT COST PRINCIPLES AND PROCEDURES

1831.205 Selected costs.

1831.205-70 Contract clause.

The contracting officer must insert the clause at 1852.231–70, Precontract Costs, in contracts for

which specific coverage of precontract costs is authorized.

Editorial Note: At 85 FR 52927, Aug. 27, 2020, 1831.205–70 was amended; however, the

amendment could not be incorporated due to inaccurate amendatory instruction.

1831.205-671 [Reserved]
§ 205.192 Proposed remedial order. ( a ) If the ERA finds, after the 30-day or other period authorized for reply to the Notice of Probable Violation, that a violation has occurred, is continuing, or is about to occur, it may issue a Proposed Remedial Order, which shall set forth the relevant facts and law.
( b ) The ERA may issue a Proposed Remedial Order at any time it finds that a violation has occurred, is continuing, or is about to occur even if it has not previously issued a Notice of Probable Violation.
( c ) The ERA shall serve a copy of the Proposed Remedial Order upon the person to whom it is directed. The ERA shall promptly publish a notice in the Federal Register which states the person to whom the Proposed Remedial Order is directed, his address, and the products, dollar amounts, time period, and geographical area specified in the Proposed Remedial Order. The notice shall indicate that a copy of the Proposed Remedial Order with confidential information, if any, deleted may be obtained from the ERA and that within 15 days after the date of publication any aggrieved person may file a Notice of Objection with the Office of Hearings and Appeals of accordance with § 205.193. The ERA shall mail copies of the Federal Register notice to all readily identifiable persons who are likely to be aggrieved by issuance of the Proposed Remedial Order as a final order.
( d ) The Proposed Remedial Order shall set forth the proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law upon which it is based. It shall also include a discussion of the relevant authorities which support the position asserted, including rules, regulations, rulings, interpretations and previous decisions issued by DOE or its predecessor agencies. The Proposed Remedial Order shall be accompanied by a declaration executed by the DOE employee primarily knowledgeable about the facts of the case stating that, to the best of declarant's knowledge and belief, the findings of fact are correct.
( e ) The ERA may amend or withdraw a Proposed Remedial Order at its discretion prior to the date of service of a Statement of Objections in that proceeding. The date of service of the amended documents shall be considered the date of service of the Proposed Remedial Order in calculating the time periods specified in this part 205.
```

[109th Congress Public Law 339]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ339.109]

[[Page 120 STAT. 1863]]

Public Law 109-339
109th Congress

                                 An Act

 
  To designate the United States courthouse at 300 North Hogan Street, 
Jacksonville, Florida, as the ``John Milton Bryan Simpson United States 
          Courthouse''. <<NOTE: Oct. 13, 2006 -  [H.R. 315]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The United States courthouse at 300 North Hogan Street, 
Jacksonville, Florida, shall be known and designated as the ``John 
Milton Bryan Simpson United States Courthouse''.
SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the United States courthouse referred to 
in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``John Milton 
Bryan Simpson United States Courthouse''.

    Approved October 13, 2006.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 315:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD:
                                                        Vol. 151 (2005):
                                    Feb. 8, considered and passed House.
                                                        Vol. 152 (2006):
                                    Sept. 29, considered and passed 
                                        Senate.

                                  <all>
```
1215.606 Agency procedures.

The OA contracting office is the designated point of contact for receipt and handling of unsolicited

proposals (see 1215.604). The assigned DOT contracting office will review and evaluate the proposal

within 30 calendar days, if practicable, in accordance with FAR 15.606–1, Receipt and initial review,

to inform the offeror of the reasons for rejection and the proposed disposition of the unsolicited

proposal.

Parent topic: Subpart 1215.6—Unsolicited Proposals
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 45 (Wednesday, March 7, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 13563]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-5357]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION OF FINE ARTS

Notice of Meeting

    The next meeting of the U.S. Commission of Fine Arts is scheduled 
for 15 March 2012, at 10 a.m. in the Commission offices at the National 
Building Museum, Suite 312, Judiciary Square, 401 F Street NW., 
Washington DC, 20001-2728. Items of discussion may include buildings, 
parks, and memorials.
    Draft agendas and additional information regarding the Commission 
are available on our Web site: www.cfa.gov. Inquiries regarding the 
agenda and requests to submit written or oral statements should be 
addressed to Thomas Luebke, Secretary, U.S. Commission of Fine Arts, at 
the above address; by emailing staff@cfa.gov; or by calling 202-504-
2200. Individuals requiring sign language interpretation for the 
hearing impaired should contact the Secretary at least 10 days before 
the meeting date.

    Dated: February 29, 2012 in Washington DC.
Thomas Luebke,
AIA, Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-5357 Filed 3-6-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6331-01-M
```
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Integra Bank Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each
of the undersigned certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Michael T. Vea
-------------------------------------
Chief Executive Officer
November 8, 2005


/s/ Sheila A. Stoke
-------------------------------------
Chief Accounting Officer
November 8, 2005


                                       32
Editorial Note on Part 2
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

§ 2.110 Filing and administrative action on submittals for standard design approval or early review of site suitability issues. ( a ) ( 1 ) A submittal for a standard design approval under subpart E of part 52 of this chapter shall be subject to §§ 2.101(a) and 2.390 to the same extent as if it were an application for a permit or license.
( 2 ) Except as specifically provided otherwise by the provisions of appendix Q to parts 50 of this chapter, a submittal for early review of site suitability issues under appendix Q to parts 50 of this chapter shall be subject to §§ 2.101(a)(2) through (4) to the same extent as if it were an application for a permit or license.
( b ) Upon initiation of review by the NRC staff of a submittal for an early review of site suitability issues under Appendix Q of part 50 of this chapter, or for a standard design approval under subpart E of part 52 of this chapter, the Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, shall publish in the Federal Register a notice of receipt of the submittal, inviting comments from interested persons within 60 days of publication or other time as may be specified, for consideration by the NRC staff and ACRS in their review.
( c ) ( 1 ) Upon completion of review by the NRC staff and the ACRS of a submittal for a standard design approval, the Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, shall publish in the Federal Register a determination as to whether or not the design is acceptable, subject to terms and conditions as may be appropriate, and shall make available at the NRC Web site, *http://www.nrc.gov ,* a report that analyzes the design.
( 2 ) Upon completion of review by the NRC staff and, if appropriate by the ACRS, of a submittal for early review of site suitability issues, the NRC staff shall prepare a staff site report which shall identify the location of the site, state the site suitability issues reviewed, explain the nature and scope of the review, state the conclusions of the staff regarding the issues reviewed and state the reasons for those conclusions. Upon issuance of an NRC staff site report, the NRC staff shall publish a notice of the availability of the report in the Federal Register and shall make the report available at the NRC Web site, *http://www.nrc.gov .* The NRC staff shall also send a copy of the report to the Governor or other appropriate official of the State in which the site is located, and to the chief executive of the municipality in which the site is located or, if the site is not located in a municipality, to the chief executive of the county.
[72 FR 49474, Aug. 28, 2007; 73 FR 5716, Jan. 31, 2008; 84 FR 65643, Nov. 29, 2019]