alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
_____ JN 77/i D/sT,f/cT c Jib 1/YE y,vi7T/) 791jb5

____ / 7W1 fl7/Z7/2/A £c%7T af /9II

____ - SouTfRJV//a4/ ___

18 SEP -2 A

W/Z5017i/1/iL&L/NVL*JW V L

s DSrnC1COU1tt

F1STRCT AL

No /g,L

___ -ö7 I

a LL-'V 1I I ____________

yr-____

/jcA.i(€c}c

I4ic2 , P2

Case 1:06-cv-00703-MHT-CSC Document 68 Filed 09/02/2008 Page 1 of 2
I t1111uIUu!

It '

cf,i',

c2-VO

OF CORRECTIONS IS NOT RESPONSIBLE—PR,W7 71*U?7/J(T97j7j

SUBSTANCE OR CONTENT OF TUF. EOW'c ___

COUJN1CAT1ON,

-.•-•-

y7YY/

...............

Case 1:06-cv-00703-MHT-CSC Document 68 Filed 09/02/2008 Page 2 of 2
Case 2:06-cr-00202-WKW-CSC Document 121 Filed 10/26/2007 Page 1 of 1
Case 2:06-cr-00202-WKW-CSC Document 121-2 Filed 10/26/2007 Page 1 of 12
Case 2:06-cr-00202-WKW-CSC Document 121-2 Filed 10/26/2007 Page 2 of 12
Case 2:06-cr-00202-WKW-CSC Document 121-2 Filed 10/26/2007 Page 3 of 12
Case 2:06-cr-00202-WKW-CSC Document 121-2 Filed 10/26/2007 Page 4 of 12
Case 2:06-cr-00202-WKW-CSC Document 121-2 Filed 10/26/2007 Page 5 of 12
Case 2:06-cr-00202-WKW-CSC Document 121-2 Filed 10/26/2007 Page 6 of 12
Case 2:06-cr-00202-WKW-CSC Document 121-2 Filed 10/26/2007 Page 7 of 12
Case 2:06-cr-00202-WKW-CSC Document 121-2 Filed 10/26/2007 Page 8 of 12
Case 2:06-cr-00202-WKW-CSC Document 121-2 Filed 10/26/2007 Page 9 of 12
Case 2:06-cr-00202-WKW-CSC Document 121-2 Filed 10/26/2007 Page 10 of 12
Case 2:06-cr-00202-WKW-CSC Document 121-2 Filed 10/26/2007 Page 11 of 12
Case 2:06-cr-00202-WKW-CSC Document 121-2 Filed 10/26/2007 Page 12 of 12
§ 20.1502 Conditions requiring individual monitoring of external and internal occupational dose. Each licensee shall monitor exposures to radiation and radioactive material at levels sufficient to demonstrate compliance with the occupational dose limits of this part. As a minimum— ( a ) Each licensee shall monitor occupational exposure to radiation from licensed and unlicensed radiation sources under the control of the licensee and shall supply and require the use of individual monitoring devices by— ( 1 ) Adults likely to receive, in 1 year from sources external to the body, a dose in excess of 10 percent of the limits in § 20.1201(a),
( 2 ) Minors likely to receive, in 1 year, from radiation sources external to the body, a deep dose equivalent in excess of 0.1 rem (1 mSv), a lens dose equivalent in excess of 0.15 rem (1.5 mSv), or a shallow dose equivalent to the skin or to the extremities in excess of 0.5 rem (5 mSv);
( 3 ) Declared pregnant women likely to receive during the entire pregnancy, from radiation sources external to the body, a deep dose equivalent in excess of 0.1 rem (1 mSv);[2] and
( 4 ) Individuals entering a high or very high radiation area.
( b ) Each licensee shall monitor (see § 20.1204) the occupational intake of radioactive material by and assess the committed effective dose equivalent to— ( 1 ) Adults likely to receive, in 1 year, an intake in excess of 10 percent of the applicable ALI(s) in table 1, columns 1 and 2, of appendix B to §§ 20.1001-20.2402;
( 2 ) Minors likely to receive, in 1 year, a committed effective dose equivalent in excess of 0.1 rem (1 mSv); and
( 3 ) Declared pregnant women likely to receive, during the entire pregnancy, a committed effective dose equivalent in excess of 0.1 rem (1 mSv).
[56 FR 23398, May 21, 1991, as amended at 60 FR 20185, Apr. 25, 1995; 63 FR 39482, July 23, 1998] Footnotes -
20.1502
[2] All of the occupational doses in § 20.1201 continue to be applicable to the declared pregnant worker as long as the embryo/fetus dose limit is not exceeded.
Case 2:06-cr-00193-MEF-CSC Document 40 Filed 11/17/2006 Page 1 of 1
#### Elaine P. Kahn, Respondent, v. Samuel Kahn, Appellant.

In an action for separation, defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated October 8, 1969, which *inter alia*directed him to pay plaintiff $275 per week for her support and the support of the parties’ child and $2,500 as and for plaintiff’s counsel fee. Order modified, on the law and the facts, by reducing the amount directed to be paid for support from $275 per week to $175 per week. As so modified, order affirmed, without costs. In our opinion, based on the conflicting affidavits contained in the present record, an award of $175 per week is proper pending trial of this action. The amount of permanent alimony and additional counsel fee allowances, if any, should be determined by the trial court upon the proof adduced at the trial *(El Khouri*v. *El Khouri,*22 A D 2d 687). Hopkins, Acting P. J., Munder, Martuscello, Brennan and Benjamin, JJ., concur.
IV 

House Calendar No. 16 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 181 

[Report No. 109–27] 

Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to 

consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on Rules. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 21 (legislative day of March 20), 2005 

Mr. GINGREY, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; 

which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

RESOLUTION 

Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with 

respect to consideration of certain resolutions reported 

from the Committee on Rules. 

1 Resolved, That the requirement of clause 6(a) of rule 

2 XIII for a two-thirds vote to consider a report from the 

3 Committee on Rules on the same day it is presented to 

4 the House is waived with respect to any resolution re5 ported on or before the legislative day of April 5, 2005, 

6 providing for consideration of a bill relating to the rights 

7 of an incapacitated person or incapacitated persons. 
House Calendar No. 16 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 181 

[Report No. 109–27] 

RESOLUTION 

Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII 

tions reported from the Committee on Rules. with respect to consideration of certain resoluMARCH 21 (legislative day, MARCH 20), 2005 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

 ______________________________

HOWARD GLENN TOOLE, *

#C 917683

Petitioner, *

 v. * 1:06-CV-696-MHT

 (WO) 

JAMES MCDONOUGH, et al., * 

Respondents. *

 ______________________________

ORDER ON MOTION

Petitioner requests an extension of time to comply with the court’s January 16, 2007

order. Upon consideration of the motion, and for good cause, it is ORDERED that:

1. The motion for extension of time (Doc. No. 34) is GRANTED; and

2. Petitioner is granted an extension from January 30, 2007 to February 20, 2007 to

file his response in accordance with the court’s January 16, 2007 order. 

Petitioner seeks leave of court to invoke the discovery process. In support of his

motion, Petitioner asserts that discovery is necessary to “aid in developing facts and

testimony necessary to decide whether the court should order an evidentiary hearing, grant

the petitioner’s writs following an evidentiary hearing, or grant the writs without the need

for an evidentiary hearing.” (Doc. No. 34 at 2.) The court has considered Petitioner’s

request for leave to invoke the discovery process and concludes that the motion is due to be

denied. See Bracy v. Gramley, 520 U.S. 899, 904 (1997). The motion may be reconsidered if

warranted by further developments in this case. Accordingly, it is 

Case 1:06-cv-00696-MHT-TFM Document 35 Filed 02/01/2007 Page 1 of 2
ORDERED that Petitioner’s motion for leave to invoke the discovery process (Doc.

No. 34) be and is hereby DENIED.

Petitioner requests production of his state trial transcripts. Upon review of the

pleadings and documents filed herein, the court finds that the request is due to be denied.

The request may be reconsidered if warranted by further developments in this case.

Accordingly, it is 

ORDERED that the motion for production of documents (Doc. No. 34) be and is

hereby DENIED.

 Done, this 1 day of February 2007. st

/s/Terry F. Moorer

TERRY MOORER

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00696-MHT-TFM Document 35 Filed 02/01/2007 Page 2 of 2
§ 1040.114 Termination of or refusal to grant or to continue Federal financial assistance. No order suspending, terminating, or refusing to grant or continue Federal financial assistance is to become effective until: ( a ) Informational notice of the proposed order is given to the Executive Assistant to the Secretary, if the action is contemplated against a State or local government;
( b ) The Director has advised the applicant or recipient of his/her failure to comply and has determined that compliance cannot be secured by voluntary means. (It will be determined by the Director that compliance cannot be secured by voluntary means if it has not been secured within the time periods specifically set forth by this part.)
( c ) There has been an express finding on the record, after opportunity for hearing, of a failure by the applicant or recipient to comply with the requirement imposed by or under this part:
( d ) The FERC has notified the Secretary of its finding of noncompliance; and
( e ) The expiration of 30 days after the Secretary or a designee has filed with the committee of the House of Representatives and the committee of the Senate having legislative jurisdiction over the program involved, a full written report of the circumstances and the grounds for such action. Any action to suspend, terminate, or to refuse to grant or to continue Federal financial assistance is to be limited to the particular political entity or part of that entity or other applicant or recipient to whom the finding has been made and shall be limited in its effect to the particular program or part of the program in which the noncompliance has been found.
<PAGE>






                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
             Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
                    ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the
Quarterly Report of SEDONA Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the
period ending September 30, 2002 (the "Report"), I, Marco A. Emrich, President
and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
the best of my knowledge:
         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

/s/Marco A. Emrich
-------------------------------------
Marco A. Emrich
President and Chief Executive Officer

November 14, 2002
#### § 930.40 Expenses.

The Board is authorized to incur such expenses as the Secretary finds are reasonable and likely to be incurred for its maintenance and functioning and to enable it to exercise its powers and perform its duties in accordance with the provisions of this part. The funds to cover such expenses shall be acquired by the levying of assessments as provided in § 930.41.
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

BUREAU OF STANDARDS

(Issued March 10, 1926)

STRAIN LINES

DEVELOPED BY COMPRESSIVE TESTS ON STRUCTURAL MEMBERS OF THE DELAWARE RIVER BRIDGE

AT THE

UNITED ST ATES BUREAU OF STANDARDS

FOR THE

DELAWARE £ RIVER BRIDGE JOINT COMMISSION

SPECIMENS

All specimi *ns were identical (except for thickness

of the web) am i had the dimensions shown below:

Specin len A: Web, 1% inches;

two 3/4 -inch plates.

specu Hen b: weD, one %-incn plate.

10'

6X4X3^ 4

L J

r i

h-35"^|

L OADING AND FAILURE

Each speci men was tested under vertical compressive loads, as si iown by the short arrows:

Specin ien A: Compressive shear or primary

failure.

Specin ien B : Buckle or secondary failure.

METHOD

The black ; scale should remain intact on the

specimen. Rei aove any grease from the surface of the

specimen. Wv th a soft brush apply a thin coat of

white Portland cement and water.

Note.—Fo r report of these tests, see forthcoming

Technologic P aper of the Bureau of Standards, by

R. S. Johnsto n; 1926. Details will be announced

when issued.

Specimen A Specimen B
#### § 13.11 Referral of complaint and answer to the ALJ.

Upon receipt of an answer, the reviewing official shall file the complaint and answer with the ALJ.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of IMCOR Pharmaceutical Co. (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB forthe period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Taffy J. Williams, Ph.D.,Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
|   | /s/ Taffy J.  Williams                             |   |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Taffy J.  Williams, Ph.D.  Chief Executive Officer |
|   |                                               |
|   | August 20,  2004                                   |

 

----
160 So.2d 225

#### Mrs. Patsy Jo COOPER v. William E. COOPER, Jr.

No. 47075.

Feb. 7, 1964.

In re: William E. Cooper, Jr. applying for certiorari or writ of review to the *634Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Parish of East Baton Rouge. 158 So.2d 248.

Writ refused. No error of law under the facts found by the Court of Appeal.

SANDERS, J., did not participate.
§ 20.1405 Public notification and public participation. Upon the receipt of an LTP or decommissioning plan from the licensee, or a proposal by the licensee for release of a site pursuant to §§ 20.1403 or 20.1404, or whenever the Commission deems such notice to be in the public interest, the Commission shall: ( a ) Notify and solicit comments from: ( 1 ) Local and State governments in the vicinity of the site and any Indian Nation or other indigenous people that have treaty or statutory rights that could be affected by the decommissioning; and
( 2 ) The Environmental Protection Agency for cases where the licensee proposes to release a site pursuant to § 20.1404.
( b ) Publish a notice in the Federal Register and in a forum. such as local newspapers, letters to State of local organizations, or other appropriate forum, that is readily accessible to individuals in the vicinity of the site, and solicit comments from affected parties.
#### § 987.1 Secretary.

*Secretary* means the Secretary of Agriculture of the United States, or any officer or employee of the Department to whom authority has heretofore been delegated, or to whom authority may hereafter be delegated, to act in his stead.
#### Charmian Chaplan, Mother on Behalf of Her Children, Respondent, v. Abraham Chaplan, Appellant.

Order of the Family Court entered February 13,1969, unanimously modified, on the law and on the facts, without costs, or disbursements to reduce the allowance of additional counsel fee from $2,000 to $500, and otherwise affirmed. Considering the extent of the services rendered, the reduced allowance is adequate compensation. Concur — Capozzoli, J. F., Tilzer, McGivern, Markewich and Steuer, JJ.
712812015 ESPC L.egislalim 

I :kOAK ., ~RIDGE P ERFORMANCE {i(e ~aJING BY STATE Z'\~donal t.abuurory 

lltlllua fiii•PC l!lnalllllng Leg ... llllan In the Un1118111-.... 

Cldclng on 11 &bite will taka you to 11 Pill& pnMdlng Inl"onnatlon on whether &tate and local govwnmant org11nlzlltlon1 are 

allowed to use performance contracting to acquire building upgredes and energy efficiency impro..ements far that state. For each state, an empty clrde )re~ntl no current legislation, while a green dn:le (. )representlleglslatlon COVI!rtng that entity. 

PI-help ua keep thla data~- 1n1 acclnta by aanclng e-mil to kl!lfti•O!!Qiqpy \'lllth q 'flllatel from yaur atate. 

, 

l*p"JMieb.orn1.govnnb'escot1eglslallcntv!weaco.sl*nl 111
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Dominick Dellegrazie, Appellant.

*Pro se*motion by defendant for an “Order Dismissing [his] Plea”. Appeal dismissed. The appeal was not properly perfected (see CPL 460.70; 22 NYCRR 670.16, 670.17, 670.18). Lazer, J. P., Mangano, Gibbons and Rabin, JJ., concur.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON , D
.C
. 2046 0

Cytec Industries, Inc. c/o Mike Kelley Agent for Cytec Industries, Inc. 7140 Heritage Village Plaza Gainesville, VA 20155 OFFICE OF CHEMICAL SAFETY AND POLLUTION PR EVENTION

October 25, 2012

Subject:
. Agency Response to Registrant Letters Regarding DGH Data Compensation Dear Mr. Kelley: In response to your June 18, 2012 letter written on behalfofCytec Industries , Inc. regarding DGH toxicology data compensation, the Agency has reviewed the appropriate DGH toxicology data and determined that the studies referenced in your letter satisfy the data submission obligations presented in the Agency's May 9, 2009 letter. The Agency will not be updating the risk assessment performed in the Addendum to the 2005 Dodine Reregistration Eligibility Decision (RED): Antimicrobial Uses of Dodecylguanidine Hydrochloride (DGH) and, because your company has satisfied the data submission obligations, no further citation or offer of compensation for additional studies is required
. Please contact Rebecca von dem Hagen ofmy staffifyou have any questions about this letter. She may be reached at (703) 305-6785 or vondem-hagen.rebecca@epa.gov
.

cc: Mark Dyner, Office of General Counsel Sincerely,

# ~~~/'----**·** Mike Mendelsohn Acting Chief, Risk Management Branch II Antimicrobials Division

Catherine Britton, Pesticide Re-evaluation Division Rebecca von dem Hagen and Lance Wormell, Antimicrobials Division
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v ) CR. NO. 3:06cr208-MEF

)

JASON EDWARD COFIELD )

ORDER

For good cause, it is

ORDERED that the pretrial conference presently set for February 20, 2007 at 1:00

p.m. in Courtroom 4B be and is hereby MOVED to Courtroom 5B, United States

Courthouse Complex, One Church Street, Montgomery, Alabama. 

Done this 15 day of February 2007. th

 /s/Charles S. Coody 

CHARLES S. COODY

CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 3:06-cr-00208-MEF-CSC Document 36 Filed 02/15/2007 Page 1 of 1
§ 20.2002 Method for obtaining approval of proposed disposal procedures. A licensee or applicant for a license may apply to the Commission for approval of proposed procedures, not otherwise authorized in the regulations in this chapter, to dispose of licensed material generated in the licensee's activities. Each application shall include: ( a ) A description of the waste containing licensed material to be disposed of, including the physical and chemical properties important to risk evaluation, and the proposed manner and conditions of waste disposal; and
( b ) An analysis and evaluation of pertinent information on the nature of the environment; and
( c ) The nature and location of other potentially affected licensed and unlicensed facilities; and
( d ) Analyses and procedures to ensure that doses are maintained ALARA and within the dose limits in this part.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 227 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 227

   Recognizing and honoring the contributions of Indian Americans to 
               economic innovation and society generally.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 21, 2005

Mr. Tom Davis of Virginia (for himself, Mr. Faleomavaega, Mr. Wilson of 
South Carolina, Ms. Ros-Lehtinen, Mr. Jindal, Mr. Menendez, Mr. Lantos, 
  Mr. McNulty, Ms. Watson, Mr. Crowley, Mr. Pallone, Mr. Cannon, Mrs. 
 Blackburn, Mrs. Capito, Mr. Chocola, Mr. English of Pennsylvania, Mr. 
Lewis of California, Mr. Sweeney, Mr. Renzi, Mr. Franks of Arizona, Mr. 
Souder, Mrs. Miller of Michigan, Ms. Foxx, Mr. Waxman, Mr. Berman, Mr. 
 Wynn, Ms. Loretta Sanchez of California, Mr. Hastings of Florida, Mr. 
  Rangel, Mr. Turner, Mr. Holt, Mr. Shays, Mr. Moran of Virginia, Mr. 
Chandler, Ms. Zoe Lofgren of California, Mr. Cox, Mr. Porter, Mr. Ney, 
 Mr. Smith of New Jersey, Mrs. Capps, Mr. Knollenberg, Mr. Murphy, Mr. 
McKeon, Mr. Duncan, Mr. Gibbons, Mr. Pearce, Mr. Weller, Mrs. Bono, Mr. 
 Shuster, Mr. Hyde, Mr. Bonilla, Mr. Walden of Oregon, Mr. Foley, Mr. 
  Platts, and Mr. Issa) submitted the following resolution; which was 
             referred to the Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Recognizing and honoring the contributions of Indian Americans to 
               economic innovation and society generally.

Whereas the United States is deeply enriched by its Indian American residents;
Whereas the Indian American community and the graduates of the Indian Institutes 
        of Technology (IIT) in the United States have made valuable and 
        significant contributions to society in every profession and discipline; 
        and
Whereas IIT graduates are highly committed and dedicated to research, 
        innovation, and promotion of trade and international cooperation between 
        India and the United States: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) recognizes the valuable and significant contributions 
        of Indian Americans to American society;
            (2) honors the economic innovation attributable to 
        graduates of the Indian Institutes of Technology; and
            (3) urges all Americans to recognize the contributions of 
        Indian Americans and have a greater appreciation of the role 
        Indian Americans have played in helping to advance and enrich 
        American society.
                                 <all>
```