alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR

THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) CR. NO. 3:06CR210-MEF

)

MELISSA WARD )

MOTION TO CONTINUE OR

RESCHEDULE PRETRIAL CONFERENCE

Defendant Melissa Ward, through counsel, moves this Honorable Court to

reschedule the pretrial conference of this case, and as grounds for this Motion says:

1. The Court scheduled a pretrial conference in this matter on November 13 at

1:00 p.m. 

2. Counsel for Defendant Ward, appointed under the Criminal Justice Act, has

a conflict with that date and time. Counsel’s father is scheduled to see a neurologist

regarding counsel’s father’s problems, and counsel must be present in that meeting. If the

Court needs further information, counsel will be happy to provide further information.

However, it is important that counsel appear for that doctor’s visit with his father.

3. Counsel’s associate, Todd E. Hughes, does not handle criminal matters as a

general matter, and has handled very few criminal matters in ten years of practice.

Accordingly, it is not reasonably practicable for Mr. Hughes to cover the pretrial, and

counsel prefers to attend so that rescheduling the pretrial conference is requested.

4. Counsel for Defendant is available for the pretrial conference on the morning

of November 13, or after 3:30 on November 13, or any time on November 10, 14, 15, 20, or

21.

Case 3:06-cr-00210-MEF-CSC Document 11 Filed 10/26/2006 Page 1 of 2
2

WHEREFORE, for good cause shown, counsel for Defendant Ward moves this

Honorable Court to reschedule the pretrial conference in this matter as noted above. 

Respectfully submitted this the 26 day of October, 2006. th

s/ C. E. Vercelli, Jr._________________________

 CHARLES E. VERCELLI, JR. (VER003)

OF COUNSEL:

VERCELLI & ASSOCIATES, P.C.

1019 S. Perry Street

Montgomery, AL 36104-5049

TEL: 334-834-8805

FAX: 334-834-8807

cvercelli@vercelli-law.com

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on October 26, 2006, I electronically filed the foregoing with the

Clerk of the United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama, using the

CM/ECF system, which will send notification of such filing to the United States Attorney

and to all counsel of record. 

s/ C. E. Vercelli, Jr.___________________

Of Counsel

519-06\Mot-Cont-Resch-Pretrial Conf.1.wpd

Case 3:06-cr-00210-MEF-CSC Document 11 Filed 10/26/2006 Page 2 of 2
#### § 171.3 Scope.

The regulations in this part apply to any person holding an operating license for a non-power production or utilization facility issued under 10 CFR part 50 that has provided notification to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) that the licensee has successfully completed startup testing, and to any person holding an operating license for a power reactor or small modular reactor licensed under 10 CFR part 50 or a combined license issued under 10 CFR part 52 that has provided notification to the NRC that the licensee has successfully completed power ascension testing. The regulations in this part also apply to any person holding a materials license as defined in this part, a certificate of compliance, a sealed source or device registration, a quality assurance program approval, and to a Government agency as defined in this part. Notwithstanding the other provisions in this section, the regulations in this part do not apply to uranium recovery and fuel facility licensees until after the Commission verifies through inspection that the facility has been constructed in accordance with the requirements of the license.

[86 FR 32176, June 16, 2021]
#### § 170.41 Failure by applicant or licensee to pay prescribed fees.

If the Commission determines that an applicant or a licensee has failed to pay a prescribed fee required in this part, the Commission will not process any application and may suspend or revoke any license or approval issued to the applicant or licensee. The Commission may issue an order with respect to licensed activities that the Commission determines to be appropriate or necessary to carry out the provisions of this part, parts 30, 31, 32 through 35, 40, 50, 61, 70, 71, 72, 73, and 76 of this chapter, and of the act.

[66 FR 32474, June 14, 2001]
Subpart 2806.2 - Full and Open Competition

After Exclusion of Sources

Parent topic: PART 2806 - COMPETITION REQUIREMENTS

2806.202 Establishing or maintaining alternative sources.

The HCA or designee is the agency head for the purposes of FAR 6.202.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v ) CR. NO. 2:06cr200-WHA

)

ROSA E. RINCON )

O R D E R

Now pending before the court is the defendant’s motion to produce (doc. #81) in which

counsel seeks to have his client produced for the oral argument on December 1, 2006. The

motion was filed on November 30, 2006. On November 29, 2006, the court entered an order

in which the defendant was ordered to be produced.

The Clerk is directed to provide a court reporter and an interpreter for these

proceedings. The Court has previously ordered that defendant Rincon be

produced for the evidentiary hearing. The United States Marshal or the persons

having custody of the defendants shall produce both defendants for these

proceedings. 

See Doc. # 80. 

Accordingly, upon consideration of the motion, and for good cause, it is

ORDERED that the defendant’s motion to produce (doc. # 81) be and is hereby DENIED

as moot.

Done this 30 day of November, 2006. th

 /s/Charles S. Coody 

CHARLES S. COODY

CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:06-cr-00200-WHA-CSC Document 82 Filed 11/30/2006 Page 1 of 1
SUBCHAPTER I - DEPARTMENT

SUPPLEMENTARY REGULATIONS

PART 870 [RESERVED]

PART 871 - VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION AND EMPLOYMENT PROGRAMS

PART 873 - SIMPLIFIED PROCEDURES FOR HEALTH-CARE RESOURCES

PARTS 874-899 [RESERVED]

PART 870 [RESERVED]

PART 871 - VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION AND EMPLOYMENT PROGRAMS

Subpart 871.1 - [Reserved]

Subpart 871.2 - Vocational Rehabilitation and Employment Service

871.200 Scope of subpart.

871.201 General.

871.201-1 Requirements for the use of contracts.

871.205 Proration of charges.

871.206 Other fees and charges.

871.207 Payment of tuition or fees.

871.208 Rehabilitation facilities.

871.209 Prohibition on advertising - training of Veterans.

871.210 PART 872 [RESERVED]

PART 873 - SIMPLIFIED PROCEDURES FOR HEALTH-CARE RESOURCES

873.101 Policy.

873.102 Definitions.

873.103 Priority sources.

873.104 Competition requirements.

873.105 Acquisition planning.

873.106 Exchanges with industry before receipt of proposals.

873.107 Socioeconomic programs.

873.108 Publicizing contract actions.

873.109 General requirements for acquisition of health-care resources.

873.110 Solicitation provisions.

873.111 Acquisition strategies for health-care resources.

873.112 Evaluation information.

873.113 Exchanges with offerors.

873.114 Best value pool.

873.115 Proposal revisions.

873.116 Source selection decision.

873.117 Award to successful offeror.

873.118 Debriefings.

PARTS 874-899 [RESERVED]
Editorial Note on Part 2
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

§ 2.815 Docketing and acceptance review. ( a ) Each application for a standard design certification will be assigned a docket number. However, to allow a determination as to whether an application is complete and acceptable for docketing, it will be initially treated as a tendered application. A copy of the tendered application will be available for public inspection at the NRC Web site, *http://www.nrc.gov ,* and/or at the NRC Public Document Room. Generally, the determination on acceptability for docketing will be made within a period of 30 days. The Commission may decide to determine acceptability on the basis of the technical adequacy of the application as well as its completeness.
( b ) If the Commission determines that a tendered application is complete and acceptable for docketing, a docket number will be assigned to the application or part thereof, and the applicant will be notified of the determination.
[72 FR 49482, Aug. 28, 2007]
Third Amendment to the Cardinal Health 401K Savings Plan



 Exhibit 4.8 
 THIRD AMENDMENT 
 TO THE 
 CARDINAL HEALTH 401(K) SAVINGS PLAN 
 (As amended and restated effective January 1, 2006) 
 Background
Information 
 A. Cardinal Health, Inc. (“Cardinal Health”) previously adopted and currently maintains the Cardinal Health
401(k) Savings Plan (the “Plan”), for the benefit of employees of Cardinal Health and its subsidiaries and affiliates. 
 B.
Section 12.02 of the Plan permits the amendment of the Plan at any time. 
 C. The Cardinal Health, Inc. Financial Benefit Plans Committee
(the “Committee”) is authorized to approve the amendment of the Plan and documents related to the Plan’s administration. 
 D.
The Committee desires to amend the Plan to clarify the Plan’s loan procedures applicable to former participants under the Plan. 
 Amendment of the Cardinal Health 401(k) Savings Plan 
 The Plan is hereby amended as set forth below
effective as of January 1, 2007. 
 1. The first paragraph of Section 6.06A of the Plan regarding loans to Plan participants is hereby
clarified by adding a new last sentence to read as follows: 
 Notwithstanding the foregoing, a loan may be made available to a
Former Participant who remains an active employee on an Employer’s payroll. 
 2. All other provisions of the Plan shall remain in full
force and effect. 
  

			
	CARDINAL HEALTH, INC.
		
	BY:	 	         /s/ Joan Kelly

		
	ITS:	 	         Sr. VP Total Rewards

		
	DATE:	 	             11/16/07
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
Just i ces

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk August 6, 2009

0804 

# Order

August 6, 2009

138101

KATHERINE N. DIXON, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 138101 COA: 286261 WCAC: 07-000225 CHRYSLER L.L.C., f/k/a DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Chief Justice, a sti pulation signed by counsel for the parties agreeing to the dismissal of this application for leave to appeal is considered, and the application for leave to appeal is DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs.
18.270 Head of contracting activity

determinations.

The DLA Acquisition Director has delegated authority to the contracting officer to make the

determinations at—

(a) 18.201(b) and (c);

(b) 18.202(a)-(d); and

(c) 18.204(b).

Parent topic: SUBPART 18.2 – EMERGENCY ACQUISITION FLEXIBILITIES
###### Editorial Note on Part 2

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

#### § 2.1506 Written statements and submission of information.

All participants shall file written statements on the Commission-identified issues, and may submit documentary and demonstrative information. Written statements, copies of documentary information, and a list and short description of any demonstrative information to be submitted must be received by the NRC (and in a hearing on issues stemming from a § 2.335(b) petition, by the parties in the proceeding in which the petition was filed) no later than ten (10) days before the commencement of the oral hearing.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION

J.B., a minor child, by and )

through his next friend, )

Addie Ward, on behalf of )

himself and all others )

similarly situated, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

v. ) 2:06cv755-MHT

) 

WALTER WOOD, in his )

individual capacity, )

)

Defendant. )

J.B., a minor child, by and )

through his next friend, )

Addie Ward, on behalf of )

himself and all others )

similarly situated, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

v. ) 2:06cv908-MHT

) 

WALTER WOOD, in his )

individual capacity, )

)

Defendant. )

Case 2:06-cv-00755-MHT-CSC Document 40 Filed 07/11/2007 Page 1 of 2
ORDER

It is ORDERED that the motion to file under seal

(Doc. No. 35) is granted.

DONE, this the 11th day of July, 2007.

 /s/ Myron H. Thompson 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00755-MHT-CSC Document 40 Filed 07/11/2007 Page 2 of 2
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>



   
Exhibit No. 27
ENCORE COMPUTER CORPORATION
Financial Data Schedule
(in thousands except per share data)
For the three months ended March 30, 1997

 Cash and cash items                                   5,006
 Marketable securities                                     0
 Notes and accounts receivable-trade                  10,997
 Allowances for doubtful accounts                       -759
 Inventory                                            12,100
 Total current assets                                 28,134
 Property, plant and equipment                        82,002
 Accumulated depreciation                            -49,823
 Total assets                                         61,866
 Total current liabilities                            74,334
 Bonds, mortgages and similar debt                       612
 Preferred stock no mandatory redemption                  49
 Common stock                                            373
 Other shrhldrs' eq (Cap'l deficiency)               -14,590
 Total liabilities & equity                           61,866
 Sales of tangible products                            4,183
 Total revenues                                        8,333
 Cost of tangible goods sold                           7,176
 Total costs applicable to revenues                   11,445
 Other costs and expenses                                663
 Provision for doubtful accounts and notes               159
 Interest and amortization of debt discount            1,370
 Loss before taxes                                   -20,052
 Income tax expense                                      -29
 Net loss                                            -20,023
 Earnings per share-primary                            -0.72
 Earnings per share-fully diluted                      -0.10
    




</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Artec Global Media, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2016, I, Caleb Wickman, President and Treasurer of Artec Global Media, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:



(1)Such Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2016, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)The information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2016, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Artec Global Media, Inc.



|                    |     |                                                                                                 | 
|------------------- | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|Date: June 22, 2016 | By: | */s/ Caleb Wickman*                                                                             | 
|                    |     | Caleb Wickman                                                                                   | 
|                    |     | President, Treasurer and Secretary(Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer) |
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

vs. ) Case No. 2:06CR197-MEF

)

RODERICK CHARLES MELVIN )

PRETRIAL CONFERENCE ORDER

A pretrial conference was held on October 13, 2006 before the undersigned

Magistrate Judge. Present at this conference was the Honorable Kevin Butler, counsel for

the defendant, and Assistant United States Attorney Tommie Hardwick, counsel for the

government. As a result of the conference, it is

ORDERED as follows:

1. Jury selection is set for November 27, 2006. The trial of this case is set for the

trial term commencing on November 27, 2006 before Chief United States District Judge

Mark E. Fuller and is expected to last one trial day.

2. The following motion is pending: Defendant’s Motion to Suppress. An

evidentiary hearing on Defendant’s Motion to Suppress is set for October 25, 2006 at 9:00

a.m.

3. Proposed voir dire questions shall be filed on or before November 20, 2006.

Counsel should not include questions seeking information which is provided in the jury

questionnaire.

Case 1:06-cr-00197-MEF-CSC Document 15 Filed 10/16/2006 Page 1 of 2
4. All Motions in Limine shall be filed on or before November 20, 2006. Motions

in Limine must be accompanied by a brief. Failure to file a brief will result in denial of the

motion.

5. Proposed jury instructions shall be filed on or before November 20, 2006.

6. The court will not consider a plea pursuant to Rule 11(c) (1)(A) or (C) unless

notice is filed on or before noon on November 15, 2006. The government and defendant

are informed that if a defendant waits until the last minute to enter a plea, and if that plea, for

whatever reason, is not accepted by the court, the defendant and the government will be

expected to be prepared to go to trial on November 27, 2006. The court will not continue

the trial of this case as to any defendant because a defendant’s plea was not accepted. In

other words, the defendant and the government should not wait until the last minute for a

defendant to enter a guilty plea, and both the defendant and the government should all be

ready to go to trial on November 27, 2006, as to all defendants, even though a particular

guilty plea was not accepted by the court.

Done this 16 day of October, 2006. th

 /s/Charles S. Coody 

CHARLES S. COODY

CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:06-cr-00197-MEF-CSC Document 15 Filed 10/16/2006 Page 2 of 2
Case 2:06-cr-00198-WKW-CSC Document 58 Filed 08/28/2007 Page 1 of 1
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) CRIMINAL ACTION NO.

) 2:06cr203-MHT

JOSEPH LEE STRINGER )

ORDER

It is ORDERED that the motion to add publication

dates to record (Doc. No. 31) is granted.

The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter the legal

notice into the record.

DONE, this the 9th day of April, 2007.

 /s/ Myron H. Thompson 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cr-00203-MHT-CSC Document 32 Filed 04/09/2007 Page 1 of 1
###### Editorial Note on Part 2

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

#### § 2.1201 Definitions.

The definitions of terms contained in § 2.4 apply to this subpart unless a different definition is provided in this subpart.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

In the Matter of the Extradition of )

)

)

MARIA del ROSARIO MORENO-VAZQUEZ ) CIV. NO. 3:06cv761-CSC

a/k/a MARIA COONLEY )

O R D E R

Now pending before the court is the respondent’s motion to extend the time to selfsurrender (doc. # 50). Upon consideration of the motion, and for good cause, it is

ORDERED that the motion to extend time to self-surrender (doc. # 50) be and is

hereby GRANTED. Maria del Rosario Moreno-Vazquez shall surrender herself to the

United States Marshal for the Middle District of Alabama on or before 12:00 noon on

August 28, 2008, to be confined in the appropriate facilities and to remain until she is

surrendered to a duly qualified agent of Mexico pursuant to the applicable provisions of

Treaty and law, or until further order of the court or from the Secretary of State of the United

States of America.

The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to notify defense counsel, the United States

Attorney for the Middle District of Alabama, the United States Marshal, and Pretrial Services

of this order.

Done this 25th day of August, 2008.

 /s/Charles S. Coody 

CHARLES S. COODY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-00761-CSC Document 51 Filed 08/25/2008 Page 1 of 1
#### § 1042.540 Advertising.

A recipient shall not in any advertising related to employment indicate preference, limitation, specification, or discrimination based on sex unless sex is a bona fide occupational qualification for the particular job in question.
2811.603 Procedures.

The HCA or designee is the agency head for the purposes of FAR 11.603.

Parent topic: Subpart 2811.6 - Priorities and Allocations
SUBPART 50.1 – EXTRAORDINARY

CONTRACTUAL ACTIONS

(Revised August 30, 2022 through PROCLTR 22-12)

Parent topic: PART 50 – EXTRAORDINARY CONTRACTUAL ACTIONS AND THE SAFETY ACT

50.101 General.

50.101-3 Records.

(a) Records shall be maintained by the contracting officer in Records Management.

(b) Per DLAD 4.802, DLR sites shall follow the processes and systems at the Military Services sites.

50.103 Contract adjustments.

50.103-5 Processing cases.

(S-90) The procuring organization responsible for processing a contractor's request is responsible

for processing cases in accordance with DFARS PGI 250.103-5 and, following legal review by Office

of Counsel, will send the case with recommendation for disposition through the HCA to the DLA

Acquisition Operations Division for processing to the Agency Director for decision. The procuring

organization is also responsible for establishing liaison and joint action with other Military

Departments and other departments and agencies of the Government, as appropriate.

50.103-6 Disposition.

In accordance with DFARS 250.103-6, the DLA Acquisition Operations Division will maintain records

of disposition in accordance with DFARS PGI 250.103-6.
DISCIPLINARY CASES

2007-1115.

#### Disciplinary Counsel v. Bubna.

This cause is before the court upon respondent’s filing of an affidavit of compliance on January 11, 2008. Upon consideration thereof,

It is ordered that respondent file, within 20 days *of*the date of this order, *an*affidavit that meets the requirements of the court's suspension order of December 12, 2007. The affidavit shall include, inter alia, details of how respondent has complied with the notification requirements of the order and proof that such notices have been sent by certified mail.

It is further ordered that if respondent fails to comply with this order within 20 days of the date of this order, he shall be held in contempt and will not be reinstated until he fully complies.
Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



I, Kevin Cadette, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of JobsInSite, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-KSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |                   |                         |  | 
|--------------------- | ----------------- | ----------------------- |  | 
|                      |                   |                        
|Dated: April 14, 2008 | /s/ Kevin Cadette |                        
|                      | Name:             | Kevin Cadette          
|                      | Title:            | Chief Financial Officer