alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case 2:06-cv-00717-ID-SRW Document 52 Filed 06/21/2007 Page 1 of 4
Case 2:06-cv-00717-ID-SRW Document 52 Filed 06/21/2007 Page 2 of 4
Case 2:06-cv-00717-ID-SRW Document 52 Filed 06/21/2007 Page 3 of 4
Case 2:06-cv-00717-ID-SRW Document 52 Filed 06/21/2007 Page 4 of 4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

M IDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABA M A

OFFICE OF THE CLERK

POST OFFICE BOX 711

MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA 36101-0711

DEBRA P. HACKETT, CLERK

TELEPHONE (334) 954-3600

August 16, 2006

 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT

To: All Counsel of Record

 

Re: Cassady et al v. Pactiv Corp., et al 

Civil Action No. 2:06-cv-00679-MHT

The above-styled case has been reassigned to Judge Lyle E. Strom.

Please note that the case number is now 2:06-cv-00679-(LES). This new case number should be

used on all future correspondence and pleadings in this action.

 

Case 2:06-cv-00679-LES-CSC Document 5 Filed 08/16/2006 Page 1 of 1
SUBCHAPTER B - COMPETITION AND

ACQUISITION PLANNING

PART 2005 - PUBLICIZING CONTRACT ACTIONS

PART 2009 - CONTRACTOR QUALIFICATIONS

PART 2011 - DESCRIBING AGENCY NEEDS

PART 2005 - PUBLICIZING CONTRACT ACTIONS

Subpart 2005.5 - Paid Advertisements

2005.502 Authority.

PART 2009 - CONTRACTOR QUALIFICATIONS

Subpart 2009.1 - Responsible Prospective Contractors

2009.100 NRC policy.

2009.105-70 Contract provisions.

Subpart 2009.4 - Debarment, Suspension, and Ineligibility

2009.403 Definitions.

2009.404 Consolidated list of parties excluded from Federal procurement or nonprocurement programs.

2009.405 Effect of listing.

2009.405-1 Continuation of current contracts.

2009.405-2 Restrictions on subcontracting.

2009.406 Debarment.

2009.406-3 Procedures.

2009.407 Suspension.

2009.407-3 Procedures.

2009.470 Appeals.

Subpart 2009.5 - Organizational Conflicts of Interest

2009.500 Scope of subpart.

2009.570 NRC organizational conflicts of interest.

2009.570-1 Scope of policy.

2009.570-2 Definitions.

2009.570-3 Criteria for recognizing contractor organizational conflicts of interest.

2009.570-4 Representation.

2009.570-5 Contract clauses.

2009.570-6 Evaluation, findings, and contract award.

2009.570-7 Conflicts identified after award.

2009.570-8 Subcontracts.

2009.570-9 Waiver.

2009.570-10 Remedies.

PART 2011 - DESCRIBING AGENCY NEEDS

Subpart 2011.4 - Delivery or Performance Schedules - Contract Clauses

2011.104-70 NRC Clauses.
Editorial Note on Part 2
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

§ 2.1025 Authority of the Presiding Officer to dispose of certain issues on the pleadings. ( a ) Any party may move, with or without supporting affidavits, for a decision by the Presiding Officer in that party's favor as to all or any part of the matters involved in the proceeding. The moving party shall annex to the motion a separate, short, and concise statement of the material facts as to which the moving party contends that there is no genuine issue to be heard. Motions may be filed at any time. Any other party may file an answer supporting or opposing the motion, with or without affidavits, within twenty (20) days after service of the motion. The party shall annex to any answer opposing the motion a separate, short, and concise, statement of the material facts as to which it is contended there exists a genuine issue to be heard. All material facts set forth in the statement to be filed by the moving party will be deemed to be admitted unless controverted by the statement required to be filed by the opposing party. The opposing party may, within ten (10) days after service, respond in writing to new facts and arguments presented in any statement filed in support of the motion. No further supporting statements or responses thereto may be entertained. The Presiding Officer may dismiss summarily or hold in abeyance motions filed shortly before the hearing commences or during the hearing if the other parties or the Presiding Officer would be required to divert substantial resources from the hearing in order to respond adequately to the motion.
( b ) Affidavits must set forth those facts that would be admissible in evidence and show affirmatively that the affiant is competent to testify to the matters stated therein. The Presiding Officer may permit affidavits to be supplemented or opposed by further affidavits. When a motion for summary disposition is made and supported as provided in this section, a party opposing the motion may not rest upon the mere allegations or denials of its answer; its answer by affidavits or as otherwise provided in this section must set forth specific facts showing that there is a genuine issue of fact. If no such answer is filed, the decision sought, if appropriate, must be rendered.
( c ) The Presiding Officer shall render the decision sought if the filings in the proceeding show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a decision as a matter of law. However, in any proceeding involving a construction authorization for a geologic repository operations area, the procedure described in this section may be used only for the determination of specific subordinate issues and may not be used to determine the ultimate issue as to whether the authorization must be issued.
[56 FR 7798, Feb. 26, 1991]
To learn more about radon, contact your loca

Washington, DC 20460 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Indoor Environments Division (6609J) United States Environmental Protection Agency Learning about RADON a part of nature 

l tribal health department or a state radon 

program office. For a list of state contacts and more on radon, visit www.epa.gov/radon. This document was prepared by the Western Regional Radon Training Center in cooperation with the U.S. EPA. Acknowledgments to Milt Lammering, Denise Scheberle, Dick Beardmore, Laura Smith, Ann Blackstone, Jim Reidhead, Patricia Joyce, and Greg East.
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Richard Kuklinski, Respondent, v Sentry Communications et al., Appellants. Workers’ Compensation Board, Respondent.

Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed October 3, 1979, affirming a referee’s decision finding that the claimant’s accidental injuries of June 18, 1977 arose out of and in the course of his employment. The board found: "based on the evidence and testimony that the accidental injuries were not due solely to intoxication [and that] Claimant had spent the night attending shows at the direction of his employer and he sustained injuries when his car struck a utility pole.” There is substantial evidence to sustain the determination of the board. Decision affirmed, with costs to the Workers’ Compensation Board against the employer and its insurance carrier. Mahoney, P. J., Greenblott, Main and Mikoll, JJ., concur; Staley, Jr., J., not taking part.
§ 110.22 General license for the export of source material. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraph (e) of this section, a general license is issued to any person to export the following to any country not listed in § 110.28: ( 1 ) Uranium or thorium, other than uranium-230, uranium-232, thorium-227, and thorium-228, in any substance in concentrations of less than 0.05 percent by weight.
( 2 ) Thorium, other than thorium-227 and thorium-228, in incandescent gas mantles or in alloys in concentrations of 5 percent or less.
( 3 ) Thorium-227, thorium-228, uranium-230, and uranium-232 when contained in a device, or a source for use in a device, in quantities of less than 3.7 × 10−3 TBq (100 millicuries) of alpha activity (3.12 micrograms thorium-227, 122 micrograms thorium-228, 3.7 micrograms uranium-230, 4.7 milligrams uranium-232) per device or source.
( 4 ) A general license is issued to any person to export uranium, enriched to less than 20 percent in U-235, in the form of UF6 heels in cylinders being returned to suppliers in EURATOM or the United Kingdom.
( b ) Except as provided in paragraph (e) of this section, a general license is issued to any person to export uranium or thorium, other than uranium-230, uranium-232, thorium-227, or thorium-228, in individual shipments of 10 kilograms or less to any country not listed in § 110.28 or § 110.29, not to exceed 1,000 kilograms per calendar year to any one country or 500 kilograms per calendar year to any one country when the uranium or thorium is Canadian-obligated.
( c ) Except as provided in paragraph (e) of this section, a general license is issued to any person to export uranium or thorium, other than uranium-230, uranium-232, thorium-227, or thorium-228, in individual shipments of 1 kilogram or less to any country listed in § 110.29, not to exceed 100 kilograms per calendar year to any one country.
( d ) Except as provided in paragraph (e) of this section, a general license is issued to any person to export uranium-230, uranium-232, thorium-227, or thorium-228 in individual shipments of 10 kilograms or less to any country listed in § 110.30, not to exceed 1,000 kilograms per calendar year to any one country or 500 kilograms per calendar year to any one country when the uranium or thorium is Canadian-obligated.
( e ) Paragraphs (a), (b), (c), and (d) of this section do not authorize the export under general license of source material in radioactive waste.
[75 FR 44088, July 28, 2010, as amended at 77 FR 27114, May 9, 2012; 87 FR 68032, Nov. 14, 2022]
# Subpart 814.1 [Reserved]

**Parent topic:**PART 814 - SEALED BIDDING
IV 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 129

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Armed Services 

in the One Hundred Ninth Congress. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 1, 2005

Mr. HUNTER submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on House Administration 

RESOLUTION

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on 

Armed Services in the One Hundred Ninth Congress.

1 Resolved,

2 SECTION 1. AMOUNTS FOR COMMITTEE EXPENSES. 

3 For the expenses of the Committee on Armed Serv4 ices (hereafter in this resolution referred to as the ‘‘Com5 mittee’’), including the expenses of all staff salaries, there 

6 shall be paid, out of the applicable accounts of the House 

7 of Representatives for committee salaries and expenses, 

8 not more than $13,333,137.00 for the One Hundred 

9 Ninth Congress. 
2

•HRES 129 IH 

1 SEC. 2. SESSION LIMITATIONS. 

2 Of the amount specified in section 1—

3 (1) not more than $6,387,373.00 shall be avail4 able for expenses incurred during the period begin5 ning at noon on January 3, 2005, and ending imme6 diately before noon on January 3, 2006; and 

7 (2) not more than $6,945,764.00 shall be avail8 able for expenses incurred during the period begin9 ning at noon on January 3, 2006, and ending imme10 diately before noon on January 3, 2007. 

11 SEC. 3. VOUCHERS. 

12 Payments under this resolution shall be made on 

13 vouchers authorized by the Committee, signed by the 

14 Chairman of the Committee, and approved in the manner 

15 directed by the Committee on House Administration. 

16 SEC. 4. REGULATIONS. 

17 Amounts made available under this resolution shall 

18 be expended in accordance with regulations prescribed by 

19 the Committee on House Administration.

Æ
Exhibit 32


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly report of eNucleus, Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I John C. Paulsen, Chief
Executive Officer and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


     (1)  The report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.



                                            /s/  John C. Paulsen
                                            --------------------------------
                                                 John C. Paulsen
                                                 Chief Executive Officer and
                                                 Principal Financial and
                                                 Accounting Officer


                                 August 16, 2004
IN THE UNITED STATES FEDERAL DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, *

Plaintiff, *

 *

vs. * CR. NO. 1:06-cr-170 WHA

 *

ROY DALE WALLACE *

Defendants. *

MOTION TO CONTINUE SENTENCING

COMES, James R. Cooper, Jr. who on behalf of his client Roy Wallace, does move this

Court to continue the trial of Mr. Wallace for January 8, 2007, to a later date and states as

follows: 

1. Mr. Wallace has certain information that is of great value to the government. He is

already cooperating with the government.

2. The government has indicated that it would take from 3 to 6 more sessions with

Mr. Wallace before he has been throughly de-briefed. He has already been debriefed once. 

3. Due to the Christmas Holiday Season, there is not sufficient time to throughly debrief Mr. Wallace before the plea deadline and Trial. Trial is set for the January

2007, term of Court.

4. The Government has forwarded a Plea Agreement to Mr. Cooper which is solely

based on cooperation up to this date. The Government through Assistant US

Attorney Clark Morris has told Mr. Cooper that at the end of Mr. Wallace’s full

cooperation, he could expect to receive significant extra consideration. 

5. Consequently, the proffered Guilty Plea is not as good as what he would expect to

receive in the future. 

6. Ms. Morris and Mr. Cooper have discussed this matter. Ms. Morris does not

object to continuing this case to give both parties sufficient time to throughly debrief Mr. Wallace so that he might receive significantly more consideration for his

cooperation. 

Wherefore the defendant requests the following relief:

Case 1:06-cr-00170-WHA-CSC Document 261 Filed 12/18/2006 Page 1 of 2
1. That this case and all applicable plea deadlines be continued until the April Term

of Court.

2. All other appropriate relief.

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,

 s/ James R. Cooper, Jr.

James R. Cooper, Jr. (COO021)

COOPER & COOPER

312 Scott Street

Montgomery, Alabama 36104

(334) 262-4887

(334) 262-4880 (Facsimile)

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on this the 18th day of December, 2006 , I have served a copy of the

foregoing Motion to Continue Upon Ms. Morris, AUSA , at the last known address of: P.O.

Box 197, Montgomery, Al By placing a copy of the same in the United States Mail properly

addressed and postage prepaid and electronically.

s/James R. Cooper, Jr.

JAMES R. COOPER, JR.

Cc:

Roy Dale Wallace

Montgomery City Jail

P.O. Box 159

Montgomery, Al 36104

Case 1:06-cr-00170-WHA-CSC Document 261 Filed 12/18/2006 Page 2 of 2
725.704 Geographic Code waivers.

(a) Authority to approve waivers of source, nationality, and transportation services requirements,

pursuant to 22 CFR part 228, subpart D, is set forth in ADS Chapters 103 and 310.

(b) If a Geographic Code other than Code 937 is authorized by a waiver, the contracting officer must

insert the authorized geographic code approved in the waiver, in the Schedule of the contract as

required in 725.702. In addition, the contracting officer must place a copy of the approved

geographic code waiver in the official contract file.

Parent topic: Subpart 725.70—Source and Nationality
#### Trisha L. WAKAT, as Administratrix of the Estate of James Henry Mitchell; Kathy Gutierrez, as Next Friend of AM, Minor Child of James Henry *266Mitchell; Sharon Patrick, as Next Friend of JM and SM, Minor Children of James Henry Mitchell, Plaintiffs-Appellants v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY TEXAS, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 07-20134

Summary Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Aug. 23, 2007.

William David George, Connelly, Baker, Maston, Wotring *&*Jackson, Houston, TX, J.D. Lambright, Conroe, TX, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.

Norman R. Giles, Chamberlain, Hrdlieka, White, Williams *&*Martin, Houston, TX, Suzanne V. Laechelin, Assistant County Attorney, County Attorney’s Office for the County of Montgomery, Conroe, TX, for Defendant-Appellee.

Before WIENER, GARZA, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

After James Henry Mitchell (“Decedent”) died on the morning of his twelfth day in the Montgomery County Texas jail, the Administratrix of his Estate and the next friends of his minor children instituted this action against the County, the Sheriff’s Department, the former and current sheriffs of the County, the Medical Director and physician for the inmates of the County Jail, the Tri-County Mental Health Agency, and various John an Jane Does, asserting constitutional claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and Texas law claims. After considerable proceedings and the accumulation of a large record, the district court granted motions for summary judgment, dismissing all federal claims against all defendants with prejudice and dismissing all state law claims without prejudice.

We have now reviewed with care the considerable record on appeal, including the district court’s extensive Memorandum Opinion and Order signed on January 12, 2007, and the facts and law as explicated in the excellent appellate briefs filed by opposing counsel. As a result, we are in complete agreement with the rulings of the district court and the reasons and reasoning supporting those rulings; and we can see no reason for writing substantively, as our doing so would merely replicate the writing of the district court. We therefore incorporate herein by reference the aforesaid Memorandum Opinion and Order of that court and affirm the rulings and judgments of the district court in all respects.

AFFIRMED.

*

 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under file limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
PUBLISHED July 16, 1996 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 94-2230(L)

CA-92-1099-3 Sony Corporation of America, now known as Sony Electronics, Inc., Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus Bank One, West Virginia, Huntington NA, formerly known as First Huntington National Bank, N.A., Defendant - Appellant,
versus The Stereo Factory, Incorporated, Defendant - Appellee.

_________ CORRECTED ORDER

_________ Appellant Bank One, West Virginia, Huntington, NA filed a petition for rehearing with suggestion for rehearing en banc, and Appellee Sony Corporation filed an answer to the petition and suggestion. A member of the Court requested a poll on the suggestion for rehearing en banc, and a majority of the judges voted to deny rehearing en banc. Judge Widener, Judge Murnaghan, Judge Niemeyer,Judge Michael, and Judge Motz voted to rehear the case en banc. Chief Judge Wilkinson, Judge Russell, Judge Hall, Judge Ervin, Judge Wilkins, Judge Luttig, and Judge Williams voted against rehearing en banc. The Court denies the petition for rehearing with suggestion for rehearing en banc. Entered at the direction of Judge Russell. Judge Widener dissents. Judge Motz dissents from the denial of rehearing en banc. For the Court
/s/ Bert M. Montague Clerk
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

JEVON GIBSON, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D16-4383 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ________________________________ ) Opinion filed April 27, 2018. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Charlotte County; John L. Burns, Acting Circuit Judge. Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Kevin Briggs, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

NORTHCUTT, SALARIO, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Marjorie Ostrander, Appellant.

Judgment of.the County Court, Dutchess County, rendered December 11, 1968, affirmed on the opinion of Judge Baratta. Beldock, P. J., Christ, Brennan, Rabin and Benjamin, JJ., concur. [58 Misc 2d 383.]
#### § 993.103 Terms in the order.

Terms defined in the order shall have the same meaning when used in this subpart.
1605.000 Applicability.       FAR part 5 has no practical application to the FEHBP because OPM does not issue solicitations. Eligible contractors (i.e., qualified health benefits carriers) are identified in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 8903. Offerors voluntarily come forth in accordance with procedures provided in 5 CFR part 890.    **Parent topic:** PART 1605—PUBLICIZING CONTRACT ACTIONS
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

DATA COMPLETENESS REPORT

Report Request ID: 1018493 Report Code: AMP430 Sep. 12, 2012

Selection Criteria Page 1

User ID: KHO

State County City Site Parameter POC AQCR UAR CBSA CSA

EPA

Region Method Duration Begin Date End Date

06 007

GEOGRAPHIC SELECTIONS

PROTOCOL SELECTIONS

Parameter

Classification Parameter Method Duration

CRITERIA 88101

SELECTED OPTIONS

OZONE EVALUATION

AGENCY ROLE

MERGE PDF FILES

Option Type Option Value

SEASONAL-HOURLY

REPORTING

YES

SORT ORDER

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Order Column

EPA_REGION

STATE_CODE

MONITOR_TYPE

COUNTY_CODE

SITE_ID

PARAMETER_CODE

POC

GLOBAL DATES

2010

Start Date End Date

01 12 2010

Tribal

Code
Sep. 12, 2012

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

DATA COMPLETENESS REPORT

Page 1 of 3

MONITORS NOT REPORTING 
Sep. 12, 2012

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

DATA COMPLETENESS REPORT

Page 2 of 3

DATE RANGE: 

REGION: (09) SAN FRANCISCO

California MONITOR TYPE: 

California Air Resources Board

SLAMS

JAN. 01, 2010 THRU DEC. 31, 2010

SITE ID

CITY

ADDRESS

PARAMETER POC DURATION

METHOD

------------------------------- OBSERVATIONS -------------------------------

NUMBER / PERCENT

06-007-0002 88101 PM2.5 - Local Conditions 1 7

Chico

468 MANZANITA AVE, CHICO

117

4

 80%

5

 100%

4

 80%

4

 80%

5

 100%

5

 100%

6

 100%

5

 100%

5

 100%

5

 100%

5

 100%

5

 100%

58

 95%

MONITORS REPORTING 

JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC YEAR

STATE:

REP ORG:
Sep. 12, 2012

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

AIR QUALITY SYSTEM

DATA COMPLETENESS REPORT

Page 3 of 3

DATE RANGE: 

REGION: (09) SAN FRANCISCO

California

MONITOR TYPE: 

California Air Resources Board

SLAMS

JAN. 01, 2010 THRU DEC. 31, 2010

PARAMETER ACTIVE MONITORS # NOT REPORTING # MONITORS > 75% MONITORS AVG COMPLETENESS

88101 PM2.5 - Local Conditions 1 0 1 95.0%

1 0 1 95.0%

1 0 1 95.0%

1 0 1 95.0%

1 0 1 95.0%

1 0 1 95.0%

California Air Resources Board

California

REGION SUMMARY: (09) SAN FRANCISCO

REPORT SUMMARY: 

MT SUMMARY: SLAMS

REPORT SUMMARY

STATE:

STATE SUMMARY: 

REP ORG:

RO SUMMARY:
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, SOUTHERN DIVISION

BUDDY GILL, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

v. ) 1:06cv718-MHT

) 

SORRELLS FUNERAL HOME, )

INC., and TERRY G. )

SORRELLS, )

)

Defendants. )

ORDER

It is ORDERED that the motion to dismiss (doc. no. 7)

is set for submission, without oral argument, on

September 27, 2006, with all briefs due by said date.

DONE, this the 13th day of September, 2006.

 /s/ Myron H. Thompson 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00718-MHT-SRW Document 8 Filed 09/13/2006 Page 1 of 1
Subpart 1953.3 - Illustrations of Forms

Parent topic: PART 1953 - FORMS

1953.300 Scope of subpart.

This subpart contains illustrations of some forms referenced in this IAAR.

1953.370 The Broadcasting Board of Governors forms.

This section contains illustrations of The Broadcasting Board of Governors forms references in this

IAAR.