alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 35
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 35 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

§ 35.632 Full calibration measurements on teletherapy units. ( a ) A licensee authorized to use a teletherapy unit for medical use shall perform full calibration measurements on each teletherapy unit— ( 1 ) Before the first medical use of the unit; and
( 2 ) Before medical use under the following conditions: ( i ) Whenever spot-check measurements indicate that the output differs by more than 5 percent from the output obtained at the last full calibration corrected mathematically for radioactive decay;
( ii ) Following replacement of the source or following reinstallation of the teletherapy unit in a new location;
( iii ) Following any repair of the teletherapy unit that includes removal of the source or major repair of the components associated with the source exposure assembly; and
( 3 ) At intervals not exceeding 1 year.
( b ) To satisfy the requirement of paragraph (a) of this section, full calibration measurements must include determination of— ( 1 ) The output within ±3 percent for the range of field sizes and for the distance or range of distances used for medical use;
( 2 ) The coincidence of the radiation field and the field indicated by the light beam localizing device;
( 3 ) The uniformity of the radiation field and its dependence on the orientation of the useful beam;
( 4 ) Timer accuracy and linearity over the range of use;
( 5 ) On-off error; and
( 6 ) The accuracy of all distance measuring and localization devices in medical use.
( c ) A licensee shall use the dosimetry system described in § 35.630(a) to measure the output for one set of exposure conditions. The remaining radiation measurements required in paragraph (b)(1) of this section may be made using a dosimetry system that indicates relative dose rates.
( d ) A licensee shall make full calibration measurements required by paragraph (a) of this section in accordance with published protocols accepted by nationally recognized bodies.
( e ) A licensee shall mathematically correct the outputs determined in paragraph (b)(1) of this section for physical decay for intervals not exceeding 1 month for cobalt-60, 6 months for cesium-137, or at intervals consistent with 1 percent decay for all other nuclides.
( f ) Full calibration measurements required by paragraph (a) of this section and physical decay corrections required by paragraph (e) of this section must be performed by the authorized medical physicist.
( g ) A licensee shall retain a record of each calibration in accordance with § 35.2632.
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-22-00005-CV

ELIAZAR COSTILLA, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS THE REPRESENTATIVE OF THE 

ESTATE OF KRISTY RENEE COSTILLA, DECEASED, AND AS NEXT FRIEND OF 

A.J.C. AND C.K.C, MINORS; MELINDA RODRIGUEZ LEAL AND CAMILO TREVINO

v.

ATIYA DHALA, M.D.

On Appeal from the

197th District Court of Cameron County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2022-DCL-00053-C

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed in part and reversed 

in part, and the case should be remanded to the trial court. The Court orders the 

judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED IN PART and REVERSED IN PART, and the 

case is REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with its opinion. Costs of the 

appeal are adjudged against appellants.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

November 2, 2023
843.205-70 Contract changes - supplement.

The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 852.243-70, Construction Contract Changes -

Supplement, in solicitations and contracts for construction that are expected to exceed the micropurchase threshold for construction.

Parent topic: Subpart 843.2 - Change Orders
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway,

 Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

August 6, 2009 

0804 

Order 

 

August 6, 2009 

138101 

KATHERINE N. DIXON, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 138101 

 COA: 286261 

WCAC: 07-000225 

CHRYSLER L.L.C., f/k/a 

DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION, 

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Chief Justice, a stipulation signed by counsel for the parties 

agreeing to the dismissal of this application for leave to appeal is considered, and the 

application for leave to appeal is DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs.
-84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74

36 38 40 42


### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 07/18 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 18 Jul 06

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 39.41 N 76.30 WMeters AGL
PGI 208.7303 Procedures.       (1) Item managers and contracting officers will use the PMIC and/or other relevant data furnished with a purchase request to determine the applicability of this subpart.          (2) When an offeror advises of a precious metals requirement, the contracting officer shall use the procedures in Chapter 11 of DoD 4160.21-M, Defense Materiel Disposition Manual, to determine availability of required precious metal assets and current Government-furnished materiel (GFM) unit prices. If the precious metals are available, the contracting officer shall evaluate offers and award the contract on the basis of the offer that is in the best interest of the Government.          (3) When the clause prescribed by DFARS 208.7305 is included in a solicitation, the contracting officer shall ensure that Section B, Schedule of Supplies or Services and Prices, is structured to—          (i) Permit insertion of alternate prices for each deliverable contract line item number that uses precious metals; and          (ii) Use dual pricing evaluation procedures.    **Parent topic:** PGI 208.73 -USE OF GOVERNMENT-OWNED PRECIOUS METALS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
Exhibit 27
The following schedule contains summarized financial information extracted
from the Questar Pipeline Consolidated Statements of Income and the Balance
Sheet for the period ended September 30, 2000, and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to such unaudited financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                             854
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   16,087
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      2,520
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                21,029
<PP&E>                                         721,314
<DEPRECIATION>                                 239,446
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 540,537
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           32,087
<BONDS>                                        245,015
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         6,551
<OTHER-SE>                                     195,401
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   540,537
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                87,452
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   30,516
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                13,478
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,386
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 33,065
<INCOME-TAX>                                    12,299
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             20,766
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    20,766
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
1913.505-2 Board order forms in lieu of Optional and Standard Forms.       (a) Optional Forms 347 and 348 shall be used as prescribed in FAR 13.505 unless an equivalent form has been authorized for use by the Board Procurement Executive (or Designee). Exceptions may be granted, on a case-by-case basis, in order to accommodate computer-generated purchase order forms. Exception approval for over printing (FAR 53.104) is not needed.          (b) The Broadcasting Board of Governors Form IA-44 (see 1953.370-44) is authorized for use when obtaining nonpersonal services on an intermittent basis for such services as script writers, translators, narrators, etc.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 1913.5 - Purchase Orders
PGI 206.303-2 Content.       (b)(i) Justifications citing the authority at FAR 6.302-1 to permit the use of other than full and open competition, shall—          (A) Include the results of the request for information or sources sought notice posted in accordance with PGI                 206.302-1              (unless the requirement to post has been waived); and          (B) For non-competitive follow-on acquisitions of supplies or services previously awarded on a non-competitive basis, include a copy of the previous justification to assist the approval authority in determining whether the planned actions to remove any barriers to competition cited on the previous justification were completed.    **Parent topic:** PGI 206.303 Justifications.
Case 2:06-cr-00200-WHA-CSC Document 101 Filed 07/23/2007 Page 1 of 1
§ 218.11 Supply orders. ( a ) A supply order shall require that the firm to which it is issued take actions specified therein relating to supplying the stated volume of oil to a specified recipient including, but not limited to, distributing, producing, storing, transporting or refining oil. A supply order shall include a concise statement of the pertinent facts and of the legal basis on which it is issued, and shall describe the action to be taken.
( b ) The DOE shall serve a copy of the supply order on the firm directed to act as stated therein.
( c ) The DOE may modify or rescind a supply order on its own motion or pursuant to an application filed in accordance with § 218.32 of this part.
( d ) A supply order shall be effective in accordance with its terms, and when served upon a firm directed to act thereunder, except that a supply order shall not remain in effect ( 1 ) upon reversion of this rule to standby status or
( 2 ) twelve months after the rule has been transmitted to Congress (whichever occurs first) or
( 3 ) to the extent that DOE or a court of competent jurisdiction directs that it be stayed, modified, or rescinded.
( e ) Any firm issued a supply order pursuant to this subpart may seek modification or rescission of the supply order in accordance with procedures provided in § 218.32 of this part.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          52,783
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                   311
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    359,882
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                      1,617,193
<ALLOWANCE>                                     18,371
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,129,421
<DEPOSITS>                                   1,676,624
<SHORT-TERM>                                    32,134
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             22,171
<LONG-TERM>                                    167,612
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        16,842
<OTHER-SE>                                     209,487
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               2,129,421
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 35,478
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                2,019
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   260
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                40,757
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              15,517
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              18,625
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           22,132
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    1,260
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   3
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 14,860
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,825
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       9,825
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,705
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .40
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .40
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       0
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                     0
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                    0
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
1803.7001 Contract clause.

Contracting officers must insert the clause at 1852.203–70, Display of Inspector General Hotline

Posters, in solicitations and contracts expected to exceed $5,000,000 and performed at contractor

facilities in the United States.

Parent topic: Subpart 1803.70—IG Hotline Posters
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION 
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 
(18 U.S.C. 1350) Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of (18 U.S.C. 1350), the undersigned officer of OnePower Systems Ltd., a Nevada corporation (the Company), does hereby certify, to the best of such officers knowledge and belief, that:   1. The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended November 30, 2015 (the Form 10-K) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and     2. The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all materials respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date: August 19, 2016/s/ Soha HamdanSoha HamdanChief Executive Officer and Chief Financial OfficerPrincipal Executive Officer, Principal Accounting Officer and Principal Financial Officer This certification shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Securities Exchange Act.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CASE NO. 2:06-cr-202-WKW

)

EUGENE L. CLECKLER, )

)

Defendant. )

ORDER

It is ORDERED that the sentencing scheduled for June 15, 2007, is CONTINUED to

June 29, 2007, at 3:00 p.m. in Courtroom 2-E of the Frank M. Johnson, Jr. U. S. Courthouse

Complex, One Church Street, Montgomery, Alabama.

DONE this 14th day of June, 2007.

 /s/ W. Keith Watkins 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cr-00202-WKW-CSC Document 107 Filed 06/14/2007 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 242 (Friday, December 17, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 79070]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-31713]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary


Notice of Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience and 
Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits Filed Under Subpart B 
(Formerly Subpart Q) During the Week Ending November 20, 2010

    The following Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience 
and Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits were filed under Subpart 
B (formerly Subpart Q) of the Department of Transportation's Procedural 
Regulations (See 14 CFR 301.201 et seq.). The due date for Answers, 
Conforming Applications, or Motions To Modify Scope are set forth below 
for each application. Following the Answer period DOT may process the 
application by expedited procedures. Such procedures may consist of the 
adoption of a show-cause order, a tentative order, or in appropriate 
cases a final order without further proceedings.
    Docket Number: DOT-OST-2008-0043 and DOT-OST-2010-0283.
    Date Filed: November 15, 2010.
    Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motion To Modify 
Scope: December 6, 2010.
    Description: Joint application of Iberia L[iacute]neas 
A[eacute]reas de Espa[ntilde]a, S.A. (``Iberia'') and Iberia's wholly 
owned subsidiary Iberia L[iacute]neas A[eacute]reas de Espa[ntilde]a 
Sociedad An[oacute]nima Operadora (``Iberia Operadora'') requesting the 
transfer of Iberia's foreign air carrier permit to Iberia Operadora 
effective immediately upon completion of the Iberia-British Airways 
consolidation; and transfer of related authorizations is also 
requested.

Renee V. Wright,
Program Manager, Docket Operations, Federal Register Liaison.
[FR Doc. 2010-31713 Filed 12-16-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P
(164 App. Div. 417)

#### KOLACKI v. AMERICAN SUGAR REFINING CO.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

November 20, 1914.)

Tbial (§ 108%,*)—Conduct of Counsel—Examination of Jubobs—Extent.

The action of counsel for plaintiff in asking the jurors if they were interested in an employers’ liability insurance company defending the case is reversible error.

[Ed. Note.—For other cases, set Trial, Dec. Dig. § 108%.*]

Appeal from Trial Term, Kings County.

Action by John IColacki, administrator of Michael IColacki, deceased, against the American Sugar Refining Company. From a judgment for plaintiff, and from an order denying a new trial, defendant appeals. Reversed, and new trial granted.

Argued before JENKS, P. J., and THOMAS, CARR, STAPLETON, and PUTNAM, JJ.

B. L. Pettigrew, of New York City, for appellant.

Vine H. Smith, of New York City, for respondent.

*

For other cases see same topic & § number in Dec. *&*Am. Digs. 1907 tc date, & Rep’r Indexes

PER CURIAM.

Without regard to the other points raised by appellant, this judgment and order must be reversed, because of the improper statement by plaintiff’s counsel in asking if the jurors were interested in the Employers’ Liability Insurance Company,” which is "defending this case.” Simpson v. Foundation Co., 201 N. Y. 479, 95 N. E. 10, Ann. Cas. 1912B, 321; Akin v. Lee, 206 N. Y. 20, 99 N. E. 85, Ann. Cas. 1914 A, 947; Rodzborski v. American Sugar Refining Co., 210 N. Y. 262, 104 N. E. 616. The fact of a defense by the insurance company was thus pointedly injected into the trial at its threshold. It had even less excuse than the instances where the disclosure of such an interest by a casualty company came out in the course of the examination of a witness.

The judgment and order are therefore reversed, with costs of the appeal to the appellant, and a new trial granted.
II 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3080 

To suspend temporarily the duty on other footwear with outer soles of rubber, 

plastics, leather or composition leather and uppers of leather, valued 

not over $2.50 per pair. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 25, 2006 

Mr. BROWNBACK introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To suspend temporarily the duty on other footwear with 

outer soles of rubber, plastics, leather or composition 

leather and uppers of leather, valued not over $2.50 

per pair. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. OTHER FOOTWEAR WITH OUTER SOLES OF 

4 RUBBER, PLASTICS, LEATHER OR COMPOSI5 TION LEATHER AND UPPERS OF LEATHER, 

6 VALUED NOT OVER $2.50 PER PAIR. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of 

8 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is 


wwhite on PROD1PC61 with BILLS
2 

•S 3080 IS 

1 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following 

2 new heading: 

‘‘ 9902.64.03 Other footwear with outer soles of rubber, plastics, leather, or composition 

leather and uppers of leather, valued not 

over $2.50 per pair, the foregoing not 

covering the ankle other than house slippers and other than footwear (provided 

for in subheading 6403.99.75) ................ Free No change No change On or before 

12/31/2009 ’’. 

3 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

4 subsection (a) applies to goods entered, or withdrawn from 

5 warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day after 

6 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


wwhite on PROD1PC61 with BILLS