alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Subpart 2042.570 - Differing Professional Views (DPV)    **Parent topic:** PART 2042 - CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION2042.570-1 Policy.       The Nuclear Regulatory Commission's (NRC) policy is to support the contractor's expression of professional health and safety-related concerns associated with the contractor's work for the NRC that may differ from a prevailing NRC staff view, disagree with an NRC decision or policy position, or take issue with proposed or established agency practices. An occasion may arise when an NRC contractor, contractor's personnel, or subcontractor personnel believes that a conscientious expression of a competent judgement is required to document these concerns on matters directly associated with its performance of the contract. The procedure described in 2052.242-71, Procedures for Resolving NRC Contractor Differing Professional Views, provides for the expression and resolution of DPVs of health and safety-related concerns associated with the mission of the agency by NRC contractors, contractor personnel, or subcontractor personnel on matters directly associated with its performance of the contract. The contractor shall provide a copy of the NRC DPV procedure to all of its employees performing under this contract and to all subcontractors who shall, in turn, provide a copy of the procedure to its employees. The prime contractor or subcontractor shall submit all DPV's received but need not endorse them.2042.570-2 Solicitation provisions and contract clauses.       (a) The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 2052.242-70, Resolving NRC Contractor Differing Professional Views, in the body of cost reimbursement solicitations and contracts for professional services, as appropriate. This clause may not be altered by the contracting officer.          (b) The contracting officer shall include the clause at 2052.242-71, Procedures for Resolving NRC Contractor Differing Professional Views, as an attachment to cost reimbursement solicitations and contracts for professional services, as appropriate. This clause may not be altered by the contracting officer.
PUBLIC LAW 109–300—OCT. 5, 2006 120 STAT. 1475

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S. 1275:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD:

Vol. 151 (2005): July 1, considered and passed Senate.

Vol. 152 (2006): Sept. 25, considered and passed House.

Æ

Public Law 109–300

109th Congress

An Act

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 7172 North

Tongass Highway, Ward Cove, Alaska, as the ‘‘Alice R. Brusich Post Office Building’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ALICE R. BRUSICH POST OFFICE BUILDING.

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal

Service located at 7172 North Tongass Highway, in Ward Cove,

Alaska, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Alice R. Brusich

Post Office Building’’.

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation,

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference

to the ‘‘Alice R. Brusich Post Office Building’’.

Approved October 5, 2006.

Oct. 5, 2006

[S. 1275]
Editorial Note on Part 31
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 31 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

§ 31.22 Violations. ( a ) The Commission may obtain an injunction or other court order to prevent a violation of the provisions of— ( 1 ) The Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended;
( 2 ) Title II of the Energy Reorganization Act of 1974, as amended; or
( 3 ) A regulation or order issued pursuant to those Acts.
( b ) The Commission may obtain a court order for the payment of a civil penalty imposed under section 234 of the Atomic Energy Act: ( 1 ) For violations of— ( i ) Sections 53, 57, 62, 63, 81, 82, 101, 103, 104, 107, or 109 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended;
( ii ) Section 206 of the Energy Reorganization Act;
( iii ) Any rule, regulation, or order issued pursuant to the sections specified in paragraph (b)(1)(i) of this section;
( iv ) Any term, condition, or limitation of any license issued under the sections specified in paragraph (b)(1)(i) of this section.
( 2 ) For any violation for which a license may be revoked under section 186 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended.
[57 FR 55072, Nov. 24, 1992. Redesignated at 72 FR 55927, Oct. 1, 2007]
# Subpart 1448.1 - Policies and Procedures

**Parent topic:**PART 1448 - VALUE ENGINEERING

## 1448.102 Policies.

The HCA shall establish procedures for processing and evaluating VECP's as prescribed in FAR Subpart 48.1 and 369 DM, Value Engineering.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.9

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report of ImClone
Systems Incorporated (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30,
2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Daniel S. Lynch, Senior Vice President, Chief Administrative
Officer and Acting Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

/s/ DANIEL S. LYNCH
------------------------------
Daniel S. Lynch
Acting Chief Executive Officer
June 23, 2003
#### § 1040.103 [Reserved]
# Subpart 871.1 - [Reserved]

**Parent topic:**PART 871 - VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION AND EMPLOYMENT PROGRAMS
§ 33.21 Violations. ( a ) The Commission may obtain an injunction or other court order to prevent a violation of the provisions of— ( 1 ) The Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended;
( 2 ) Title II of the Energy Reorganization Act of 1974, as amended; or
( 3 ) A regulation or order issued pursuant to those Acts.
( b ) The Commission may obtain a court order for the payment of a civil penalty imposed under section 234 of the Atomic Energy Act: ( 1 ) For violations of— ( i ) Sections 53, 57, 62, 63, 81, 82, 101, 103, 104, 107, or 109 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended;
( ii ) Section 206 of the Energy Reorganization Act;
( iii ) Any rule, regulation, or order issued pursuant to the sections specified in paragraph (b)(1)(i) of this section;
( iv ) Any term, condition, or limitation of any license issued under the sections specified in paragraph (b)(1)(i) of this section.
( 2 ) For any violation for which a license may be revoked under section 186 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended.
[57 FR 55073, Nov. 24, 1992]
#### §§ 205.199D-205.199E [Reserved]
Subpart 2814.4 - Opening of Bids and Award

of Contract

Parent topic: PART 2814 - SEALED BIDDING

2814.404 Rejection of bids.

2814.404-1 Cancellation of invitations after opening.

The HCA or designee is the agency head for the purposes of FAR 14.404-1(c), (e)(1), and (f).

2814.407 Mistakes in bids.

2814.407-3 Other mistakes disclosed before award.

(a) The authority to make determinations under paragraphs (a), (b), (c), and (d) of FAR 14.407-3 is

delegated to the HCA, or designee at a level at or above the chief of the contracting office. The HCA

or designee shall seek the advice of legal counsel before making any determinations.

(b) The following procedures shall be followed when submitting cases of mistakes in bids to the

Comptroller General for an advance decision.

(1) Requests for advance decisions submitted to the Comptroller General in cases of mistakes in bids

shall be made by the HCA, or designee.

(2) Requests for advance decisions shall be in writing, dated, signed by the requestor, addressed to

the Comptroller General of the United States, General Accounting Office, Washington, DC 20548,

and contain the following:

(i) The name and address of the party requesting the decision;

(ii) A statement of the question to be decided, a presentation of all relevant facts, and a statement of

the requesting party's position with respect to the question; and,

(iii) Copies of all pertinent records and supporting documentation.

2814.407-4 Mistakes after award.

The authority to make determinations under FAR 14.407-4 is delegated to the HCA. The HCA may

re-delegate this authority at a level at or above the chief of the contracting office. The determination

must be coordinated with the contracting activity's legal counsel.
3046.793 Waiver and notification procedures (USCG).       (a) The Secretary of Homeland Security, without delegation, may waive the requirement for a warranty for USCG major system acquisitions when the waiver is in the interest of national defense or if the warranty obtained would not be cost beneficial. A waiver may be granted provided that the Committees on Appropriations of the Senate and the House of Representatives, the Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation of the Senate, and the Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries of the House of Representatives are notified, in writing, of the Secretary's intention to waive the warranty requirements and the reasons supporting such a determination prior to granting the waiver. The request for Secretarial waiver shall include, as a minimum:          (1) A brief description of the major system and its stage of production (e.g., the number of units delivered and anticipated to be delivered during the life of the program);          (2) The specific waiver requested, the duration of the waiver if it is to involve more than one contract, and the rationale for the waiver; and          (3) All documentation supporting the request for waiver, such as a cost-benefit analysis.          (b) The waiver request shall be forwarded to the Secretary, via the CPO. The USCG shall maintain a written record of each waiver granted and the Congressional notification and report made, together with supporting documentation.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 3046.7—Warranties
IV 

House Calendar No. 28 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 239 

[Report No. 109–57] 

Dismissing the election contest relating to the office of Representative from 

the Sixth Congressional District of Tennessee. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 27, 2005 

Mr. NEY, from the Committee on House Administration, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered 

to be printed 

RESOLUTION 

Dismissing the election contest relating to the office of Representative from the Sixth Congressional District of Tennessee. 

1 Resolved, That the election contest relating to the of2 fice of Representative from the Sixth Congressional Dis3 trict of Tennessee is dismissed. 
House Calendar No. 28 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 239 

[Report No. 109–57] 

RESOLUTION 

Dismissing the election contest relating to the office 

District of Tennessee. of Representative from the Sixth Congressional 

APRIL 27, 2005 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 237 (Friday, December 10, 2010)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 76925]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-31121]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

50 CFR Part 648

[Docket No. 0908191244-91427-02]
RIN 0648-XA070


Fisheries of the Northeastern United States; Summer Flounder 
Fishery; Quota Transfer

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Temporary rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: NMFS announces that the State of North Carolina is 
transferring a portion of its 2010 commercial summer flounder quota to 
the Commonwealth of Virginia. By this action, NMFS adjusts the quotas 
and announces the revised commercial quota for each state involved.

DATES: Effective December 7, 2010 through December 31, 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sarah Heil, Fishery Management 
Specialist, 978-281-9257.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Regulations governing the summer flounder 
fishery are found at 50 CFR part 648. The regulations require annual 
specification of a commercial quota that is apportioned among the 
coastal states from North Carolina through Maine. The process to set 
the annual commercial quota and the percent allocated to each state are 
described in Sec.  648.100.
    The final rule implementing Amendment 5 to the Summer Flounder, 
Scup, and Black Sea Bass Fishery Management Plan, which was published 
on December 17, 1993 (58 FR 65936), provided a mechanism for summer 
flounder quota to be transferred from one state to another. Two or more 
states, under mutual agreement and with the concurrence of the 
Administrator, Northeast Region, NMFS (Regional Administrator), can 
transfer or combine summer flounder commercial quota under Sec.  
648.100(d). The Regional Administrator is required to consider the 
criteria set forth in Sec.  648.100(d)(3) in the evaluation of requests 
for quota transfers or combinations.
    North Carolina has agreed to transfer 1,481 lb (643 kg) of its 2010 
commercial quota to Virginia. This transfer was prompted by summer 
flounder landings of a North Carolina vessel that was towed into Cape 
Charles, VA, due to mechanical problems on November 12, 2010. The 
Regional Administrator has determined that the criteria set forth in 
Sec.  648.100(d)(3) have been met. The revised summer flounder quotas 
for calendar year 2010 are: North Carolina, 3,370,046 lb (1,528,627 
kg); and Virginia, 2,910,411 lb (1,320,140 kg).

Classification

    This action is taken under 50 CFR part 648 and is exempt from 
review under Executive Order 12866.

    Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.

    Dated: December 6, 2010.
Brian W. Parker,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine 
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2010-31121 Filed 12-7-10; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P
All communications regarding this Memorandum shall be addressed to:       (a) Mr. Timothy A. Bosch (b) Mr. Michael J. Alley  Vice President   Interim Chairman of the Board  Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis   Integra Bank Corporation  One Federal Reserve Bank Plaza   21 S.E. Third Street  St. Louis, Missouri 63166-0442   P.O. Box 868      Evansville, Indiana 47705-0868This Memorandum is not a “written agreement” for purposes of Section 8 of the Federal DepositInsurance Act, as amended.WHEREAS, the parties have caused this Memorandum to be executed as of the 16th day ofSeptember, 2009.         FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF ST. LOUIS   INTEGRA BANK CORPORATION By: /s/ Timothy A. Bosch   By: /s/ Michael J. Alley         The undersigned directors of Integra Bank Corporation acknowledge that they have read andunderstand each provision of the Memorandum.   /s/ Michael J. Alley /s/ Sandra Clark Berry   Michael J. Alley, Interim Chairman Sandra Clark Berry   /s/ H. Ray Hoops /s/ Thomas W. Miller   Dr. H. Ray Hoops Thomas W. Miller   /s/ Arthur D. Pringle, III /s/ Robert L. Goocher   Arthur D. Pringle, III Robert L. Goocher   /s/ Richard M. Stivers /s/ Daniel T. Wolfe   Richard M. Stivers Daniel T. Wolfe
---

logo 1


FAX (303) 623-4258621 SEVENTEENTH STREET
SUITE 1550
DENVER, COLORADO 80293
TELEPHONE (303) 623-9147








Exhibit No. 23.1








CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS





As independent petroleum and natural gas consultants, we hereby consent to the reference of our name in the Report on Form 10-K for the years ending December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 of Rockies Region 2006 Limited Partnership (the "Partnership"). We have no interest of a substantial or material nature in the Partnership,
or in any affiliate. We have not been employed on a contingent basis, and we are not connected with the Partnership, or any affiliate as a promoter, underwriter, voting trustee, director, officer, employee or affiliate.








signature 1RYDER SCOTT COMPANY, LP








Denver, Colorado


March 26, 2010








1100 LOUISIANA, SUITE 3800
HOUSTON, TEXAS 77002-5218
TEL (713)651-9191
FAX (713)651-08491200, 530-8TH AVENUE, S.W.
CALGARY, ALBERTA T2P 3S8
TEL (403) 262-2799
FAX (403) 262-2790
# Subpart 3027.2—Patents

**Parent topic:**PART 3027—PATENTS, DATA, AND COPYRIGHTS

## 3027.205 Adjustment of royalties.

(a) Reports shall be made to Component legal counsel. Contracting Officers shall coordinate actions with the COCO and HCA. 

## 3027.208 Use of patented technology under the North American Free Trade Agreements.

(f) Contracting officers shall ensure compliance.
Exhibit
      32.1





CERTIFICATION
      OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
      ACT
      OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Simclar, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
      10-Q/A for the period ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Barry J. Pardon,
      President of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for
      purpose of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that
      to
      the best of my knowledge:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





This
      Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, “filed” with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission.





/s/
              Barry J. PardonBarry
              J. Pardon, PresidentSimclar,
                Inc.
              October
                27, 2006
**Grant Thornton LLP**1717 Main Street, Suite 1800 Dallas, TX 75201-4667 ******T** 214.561.2300 **F** 214.561.2370 GrantThornton.com linkd.in/GrantThorntonUS twitter.com/GrantThorntonUS ******Grant Thornton****Grant Thornton LLP**U.S. member firm of Grant Thornton International Ltd **********Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**************************Board of Directors and Shareholders  Situs Holdings LLC   We  have  examined  management's  assertion,  included  in  the  accompanying  Certification  Regarding Compliance  with  Applicable  Servicing  Criteria  ("Management's  Assertion"),  that  Situs  Holdings,  LLC  (the "Company")  complied  with  servicing  criteria  set  forth  in  1117,  1119,  and  Items  1122(d)(3)(i)  and 1122(d)(4)(vii) of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB included in Appendix A as of December 31, 2014 and for the period January 1, 2014 through December 31, 2014, with respect to the Company's  Operating  or  Trust  Advisor  Services  performed  over  the  deals  listed  in  Appendix  B  (the "Platform").  Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion about the Company's compliance with the applicable servicing criteria for the Platform based on our examination.   Our  examination  was  conducted  in  accordance  with  the  standards  of  the  Public  Company  Accounting Oversight Board  (United  States)  and,  accordingly,  included  examining,  on  a  test  basis,  evidence  about  the  Company's compliance with the applicable servicing criteria for the Services and performing such other procedures  as  we  considered  necessary  in  the  circumstances.  Our  examination  was  not  designed  to  detect material noncompliance that may have occurred prior to the period covered by this report and that may have affected the Company's activities with respect to the Platform during the period covered by this report. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. In  our  opinion,  management's  assertion  that  Situs  Holdings,  LLC  complied  with  the  aforementioned minimum  servicing  standards  as  of  December  31,  2014  and  for  the  period  January  1,  2014  through December 31, 2014, for the Services is fairly stated, in all material respects. /s/ Grant Thornton LLP Dallas, Texas February 27, 2015
# Subpart 1841.5 [Reserved]

**Parent topic:**PART 1841—ACQUISITION OF UTILITY SERVICES
Editorial Note on Part 26
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 26 appear at 87 FR 71455, Nov. 22, 2022.

§ 26.95 Conducting an initial test for alcohol using a breath specimen. ( a ) The collector shall perform the initial breath test as soon as practical after the donor indicates that he or she has not engaged in the activities listed in § 26.93(a)(1) or after the 15-minute waiting period has elapsed, if required.
( b ) To perform the initial test, the collector shall— ( 1 ) Select, or allow the donor to select, an individually wrapped or sealed mouthpiece from the testing materials;
( 2 ) Open the individually wrapped or sealed mouthpiece in view of the donor and insert it into the device as required by the manufacturer's instructions;
( 3 ) Instruct the donor to blow steadily and forcefully into the mouthpiece for at least 6 seconds or until the device indicates that an adequate amount of breath has been obtained;
( 4 ) Show the donor the displayed or printed test result; and
( 5 ) Ensure that the test result record can be associated with the donor and is maintained secure.
( c ) Unless problems in administering the breath test require an additional collection, only one breath specimen may be collected for the initial test. If an additional collection(s) is required, the collector shall rely on the test result from the first successful collection to determine the need for confirmatory testing.
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACTAPPEALS Appeal of

-- ) ) Golden Build Construction Co. ) ) Under ContractNo. W91B4M-09-P-7340 ) APPEARANCE FORTHE APPELLANT:
APPEARANCES FORTHE GOVERNMENT: ASBCA No. 60556

Mr. Mahmood Nezam

ChiefExecutive Raymond M. Saunders, Esq.

Army ChiefTrial Attorney LTC Timothy A. Furin, JA

Trial Attorney ORDER OF DISMISSAL The government has moved to dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction, alleging that appellant had not submitted a claim to the contracting officer. In response, appellant expressed a desire to submit its claim to the contracting officer for a decision. As directed by the Board, the governmentprovided appellant with the contact information for the contracting officer and appellant has indicated that it submitted its claim to the contracting officer. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed without prejudice to a timely appeal from a contracting officer's denial or deemed denial ofthe contractor's claim. Dated: 16 June 2016I certify that the foregoing is a true copy ofthe Order ofDismissal ofthe Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals in ASBCA No. 60556, Appeal ofGolden Build Construction Co. rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. Dated:

2 JEFFREYD. GARDIN Recorder, Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals