alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Subpart 1414.2 - Solicitation of Bids

Parent topic: PART 1414 - SEALED BIDDING

1414.201 Preparation of invitation for bids.

1414.201-70 Alternate bids.

(a) Solicitations for supplies or services (other than construction) shall specify whether alternate

bids are permitted, provide instructions for submitting alternate bids and clearly indicate how

alternate bids will be evaluated.

(b) The clause set forth in 1452.236-71 may be used in non-construction contracts where additive

and deductive alternate bids will be permitted.
#### § 1050.102 Applicability.

These regulations apply to all DOE employees, including special Government employees, and civilian and military personnel of other Government agencies regularly detailed to DOE, and to spouses and dependents of such personnel. These regulations apply to all employees of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) to the extent the Commission by rule makes these regulations applicable to FERC employees. These regulations do not apply to gifts and bequests accepted by the Department as authorized by section 652 of the Department of Energy Organization Act (42 U.S.C. 7262), except as set forth in § 1050.202(d) of this part. These regulations do not apply to assistance from a foreign government for participation by DOE employees in foreign cultural exchange programs pursuant to the Mutual Educational and Cultural Exchange Act (22 U.S.C. 2458a).
#### Camillo Calogero, Respondent, *v.*Bills Garage, Inc., Appellant, et al., Defendants.

Appeal by defendant Bills Garage, Inc., as limited by its brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated June 25, 1968, as is against it upon a jury verdict. Judgment reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law and the facts, without costs, and new trial and severance of action granted as between plaintiff and appellant, unless,, within 30 days after entry of the order hereon, plaintiff shall serve and file in the office of the clerk of the trial court a written stipulation consenting to reduce the amount of the verdict insofar as it is in his favor against appellant, from $335,000 to $275,000, and to the entry of an amended judgment accordingly, in which event the judgment, as so reduced and amended, is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs. In our opinion, the verdict was excessive to the extent indicated. Beldock, P. J., Christ, Rabin, Benjamin and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.
Case 3:06-cv-00742-MEF-WC Document 42 Filed 03/13/2008 Page 1 of 1
2019.705-4 Reviewing the subcontracting

plan.

The contracting officer may accept the terms of an overall or “master” company subcontracting plan

incorporated by reference into a specific subcontracting plan submitted by the apparent successful

offeror/bid for a specific contract, only upon ensuring that the required information, goals, and

assurances are included in accordance with FAR 19.704.

Parent topic: Subpart 2019.7 - Subcontracting With Small Business, Small Disadvantaged Business,

and Women-Owned Small Business Concerns
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

NORTHERN DIVISION 

DELOISE PRICE, | 

 | 

 PLAINTIFF | 

 | 

VS. | CASE NO. 2:06-CV-721-MHT 

 | 

WAL-MART STORES, INC., | 

et al., | 

 | 

 DEFENDANTS | 

CONSENT AND JOINDER IN REMOVAL

 Comes now the Defendant identified as Extreme Performance, Inc. and 

hereby consents and joins in the removal of this case filed by Defendant Wal-Mart. 

 _S/Dennis R. Bailey__________ 

 Dennis R. Bailey 

 Attorney for Defendant 

Of counsel: 

RUSHTON, STAKELY, JOHNSTON & GARRETT, P.A. 

184 Commerce Street 

Post Office Box 270 

Montgomery, Alabama 36101-0270 

(334) 206-3234 (phone) 

(334) 481-0031 (fax) 

drb@rsjg.com (e-mail) 

Case 2:06-cv-00721-MHT-TFM Document 12 Filed 10/23/2006 Page 1 of 2
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

 I hereby certify that I have filed the foregoing pleading through the ECMF 

system on this the 23rd day of October, 2006, which will forward same to: 

 Jock M. Smith 

 Brian P. Strength 

 Valerie Rucker Russell 

 Cochran, Cherry, Givens, Smith, Lane & Taylor 

 Post Office Box 830419 

 Tuskegee, Alabama 36083 

 John E. Earnhardt 

 Robert Fowlkes 

 Maynard, Cooper & Gale 

 1901 Sixth Avenue North 

 2400 AmSouth/Harbert Plaza 

 Birmingham, Alabama 35203-2602 

 _S/Dennis R. Bailey_______________ 

 Of counsel 

Case 2:06-cv-00721-MHT-TFM Document 12 Filed 10/23/2006 Page 2 of 2
905.502 Authority.

(a) Newspapers. When it is deemed necessary to use paid advertisements in newspapers and trade

journals, written authority for such publication shall be obtained from the Head of the Contracting

Activity or designee.

Parent topic: Subpart 905.5 - Paid Advertisements
EX-35.5
(logo) WELLS FARGO

Corporate Trust Services
MAC R1204-010
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045

Tel: 410 884 2000
Fax: 410 715 2380


Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation
60 Wall Street
New York, New York 10005


RE: Annual Statement as to Compliance

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. ("Wells
Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows for the calendar year 2012:

(a) a review of Wells Fargo's activities as assigned and agreed to under the
servicing agreement(s) listed on Schedule A hereto (the "Servicing
Agreement(s)") has been made under my supervision; and

(b) to the best of my knowledge, based on such review Wells Fargo has fulfilled
all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement(s) in all material
respects throughout the reporting period, except as noted in Schedule B.


March 15, 2013

/s/ Julie Eichler
JULIE EICHLER
Vice President


Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

(logo) Together we'll go far


(page)


(logo) WELLS FARGO

Corporate Trust Services
MAC R1204-010
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045

Tel: 410 884 2000
Fax: 410 715 2380


To: Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation

Schedule A

List of Servicing Agreement(s) and Series

Pooling and Servicing Agreement for COMM 2012-2 Commercial Mortgage Pass-
Through Certificates, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as Certificate Administrator and
Custodian, as applicable.

Pooling and Servicing Agreement for COMM 2012-CCRE4 Commercial Mortgage
Pass-Through Certificates Series 2012-CCRE4, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as
Certificate Administrator and Custodian, as applicable.

Pooling and Servicing Agreement for COMM 2012-CCRE5 Commercial Mortgage
Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2012-CCRE5, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as
Certificate Administrator and Custodian, as applicable.


Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.


(page)


(logo) WELLS FARGO

Corporate Trust Services
MAC R1204-010
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045

Tel: 410 884 2000
Fax: 410 715 2380


To: Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation

Schedule B

Material Instances of Non-Compliance

No instances to report


Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
# Subpart 1422.1 - Basic Labor Policies

**Parent topic:**PART 1422 - APPLICATION OF LABOR LAWS TO GOVERNMENT ACQUISITIONS

## 1422.101 Labor relations.

## 1422.101-1 General.

The HCA may designate programs or requirements for which notice of labor disputes is necessary.   

## 1422.101-3 Reporting labor disputes.

Labor disputes that may interfere with contract performance shall be reported to the SOL and the HCA.   

## 1422.101-4 Removal of items from contractors' facilities affected by work stoppages.

Prior to initiating any action for removal of items from contractors' facilities, the CO shall obtain advice from SOL.   

## 1422.103 Overtime.

## 1422.103-4 Approvals.

The CO shall obtain approval for the use of overtime from the CCO after consultation with the cognizant program office.
Editorial Note on Part 2
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

§ 2.804 Notice of proposed rulemaking. ( a ) Except as provided by paragraph (d) of this section, when the Commission proposes to adopt, amend, or repeal a regulation, it will cause to be published in the Federal Register a notice of proposed rulemaking, unless all persons subject to the notice are named and either are personally served or otherwise have actual notice in accordance with law.
( b ) The notice will include: ( 1 ) Either the terms or substance of the proposed rule, or a specification of the subjects and issues involved;
( 2 ) The manner and time within which interested members of the public may comment, and a statement that copies of comments may be examined will be made available at the NRC Web site, *http://www.nrc.gov ;*
( 3 ) The authority under which the regulation is proposed;
( 4 ) The time, place, and nature of the public hearing, if any;
( 5 ) If a hearing is to be held, designation of the presiding officer and any special directions for the conduct of the hearing; and
( 6 ) Such explanatory statement as the Commission may consider appropriate.
( c ) The publication or service of notice will be made not less than fifteen (15) days prior to the time fixed for hearing, if any, unless the Commission for good cause stated in the notice provides otherwise.
( d ) The notice and comment provisions contained in paragraphs (a), (b), and (c) of this section will not be required to be applied— ( 1 ) To interpretative rules, general statements of policy, or rules of agency organization, procedure, or practice; or
( 2 ) When the Commission for good cause finds that notice and public comment are impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest, and are not required by statute. This finding, and the reasons therefor, will be incorporated into any rule issued without notice and comment for good cause.
( e ) The Commission shall provide for a 30-day post-promulgation comment period for— ( 1 ) Any rule adopted without notice and comment under the good cause exception on paragraph (d)(2) of this section where the basis is that notice and comment is “impracticable” or “contrary to the public interest.”
( 2 ) Any interpretative rule, or general statement of policy adopted without notice and comment under paragraph (d)(1) of this section, except for those cases for which the Commission finds that such procedures would serve no public interest, or would be so burdensome as to outweigh any foreseeable gain.
( f ) For any post-promulgation comments received under paragraph (e) of this section, the Commission shall publish a statement in the Federal Register containing an evaluation of the significant comments and any revisions of the rule or policy statement made as a result of the comments and their evaluation.
[27 FR 377, Jan. 13, 1962, as amended at 50 FR 13010, Apr. 2, 1985; 64 FR 48949, Sept. 9, 1999]
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

November 9, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-50502

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

LUIS HERNANDEZ-RODRIGUEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas 

USDC No. 2:05-CR-285-ALL

--------------------

Before BARKSDALE, DeMOSS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Luis HernandezRodriguez raises arguments that are foreclosed by AlmendarezTorres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held

that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a

separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary

affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.
Case 2:06-cr-00198-WKW-CSC Document 18 Filed 08/16/2006 Page 1 of 1
#### Juri Adamson, Respondent, v. Carl Silvestrelli, Appellant.

Order entered August 27, 1968 unanimously reversed on the law, the facts and in the exercise of discretion, without costs and without disbursements, and the motion to open the plaintiff’s default and to vacate the judgment entered January 12, 1965 denied. Although a complaint was never served, it appears that plaintiff’s accident occurred on August 30,1959. After a service of the summons, the plaintiff did not enter a default judgment (CPLR 3215) and further failed to serve a complaint after demand. Thereafter he defaulted on the motion to dismiss his action pursuant to CPLR 3012 (subd. [b]). Although admitting receipt under date of January 12, 1965 of the default judgment of dismissal, plaintiff waited more than three years before taking action to vacate the judgment. No *634excuse was offered concerning this last delay nor was explanation given for the original default. *{Lind*v. *Port of N. Y. Aufh.,*28 A D 2d 984; *Dooley*v. *Flavel,*28 A D 2d 1115.) Concur—Capozzoli, J. F., McGivern, Markewich and Tilzer, JJ.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v ) CR. NO. 1:06cr201-WHA

)

OSCAR MARTINEZ-RAMIREZ )

ORDER

For good cause, it is 

ORDERED that the motions hearing presently set for February 8, 2007 at 9:00 a.m.

in Courtroom 4B be and is hereby MOVED to Courtroom 5B, United States Courthouse

Complex, One Church Street, Montgomery, Alabama. 

The Clerk is directed to provide an interpreter for this proceeding. If the defendant

is in custody, the United States Marshal or the person having custody of the defendant shall

produce the defendant for the proceeding.

Done this 7 day of February 2007. th

 /s/Charles S. Coody 

CHARLES S. COODY

CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:06-cr-00201-WHA-CSC Document 39 Filed 02/07/2007 Page 1 of 1
1953.370 The Broadcasting Board of Governors forms.       This section contains illustrations of The Broadcasting Board of Governors forms references in this IAAR.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 1953.3 - Illustrations of Forms
Exhibit 32.2



Citizens Financial Corp.



Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley

Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350



I,
Thomas K. Derbyshire, Vice President, Treasurer and Principal Financial Officer of Citizens Financial Corp. (the company) certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 that:



|1. | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the company for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|              |  |                            
|------------- |  | ---------------------------
|Date: 8/12/04 |  | /s/ Thomas K. Derbyshire   
|              |  | Thomas K. Derbyshire       
|              |  | Vice President, Treasurer  
|              |  | Principal Financial Officer
|    |                                                                                            |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 1. | I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Cliffs Natural Resources Inc.; and |

|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |  |  |  |
| Date:  | October 8, 2014 |   | By: |   | /s/ Lourenco Goncalves |
|   |   |   |   |   | Lourenco Goncalves |
|   |   |   |   |   | Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer |
#### CAMALDA, Respondent, v. RUTLAND R. CO., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

June 19, 1914.)

Action by Vincenza Camalda, as administratrix, etc., against the Rutland Railroad Company.

Martin Gilligan, for appellant.

R. Maggio, of New York City, for respondent.

No opinion. Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Order filed.
Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter VIII
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 71-87K, 1621-1627.

Editorial Note on Subchapter A of Chapter VIII
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to subchapter A appear at 84 FR 45645, Aug. 30, 2019.

§ 800.164 Duplicate certificates. Upon request, a duplicate certificate may be issued for a lost or destroyed official certificate. ( a ) *Application.* Requests for duplicate certificates shall be filed: ( 1 ) in writing;
( 2 ) by the applicant who requested the service covered by the lost or destroyed certificate; and
( 3 ) with the office that issued the initial certificate.
( b ) *Certification requirements.* The same information and statements, including permissive statements, that were shown on the lost or destroyed certificate shall be shown on the duplicate certificate. Duplicate certificates shall show ( 1 ) the terms “Duplicate-Original” and the copies shall show “Duplicate-Copies” and
( 2 ) a statement that the certificate was issued in lieu of a lost or destroyed certificate.
( c ) *Issuance.* Duplicate certificates shall be issued as promptly as possible and distributed according to § 800.160.
( d ) *Limitations.* Duplicate certificates will not be issued for certificates that have been superseded.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 0580-0011)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

vs. ) Criminal Case No. 2:06-cr-200-CSC

)

ROSA E. RINCON )

MOTION FOR LEAVE TO SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL AT ARRAIGNMENT

COMES NOW Defendant, by and through counsel, and prays that this Court will grant

her counsel leave to be absent from her arraignment on August 30, 2006, and to be represented

instead by the Honorable Kevin Butler or his designee from the Office of the Federal Defender. 

As grounds Defendant would show as follows:

1. Defendant’s counsel is expected to be in Gadsden, Alabama, that morning for a scheduled

meeting with a client, and then to appear early that afternoon before Magistrate Judge

Putnam of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama for a

pretrial hearing in the case of Lacy v. Heard, 4:05-cv-2154-TMP. While the undersigned

can cancel his meeting in Gadsden – and will certainly do so at the direction of the Court

– the said meeting involves other lawyers and clients and will be difficult to reschedule. 

Moreover, divorcing the pretrial trip from the meeting trip will squander scarce petroleum

resources in this time of global shortage.

WHEREFORE, the premises considered, Defendant prays that the Court will grant

Defendant’s motion for leave to substitute counsel at arraignment.

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, this __25th__ day of August, 2006.

/s/ JAY LEWIS

Law Offices of Jay Lewis, L.L.C.

Case 2:06-cr-00200-WHA-CSC Document 34 Filed 08/25/2006 Page 1 of 2
P.O. Box 5059

Montgomery, Alabama 36103

(334) 263-7733 (Voice)

(334) 832-4390 (Fax)

J-Lewis@JayLewisLaw.com

ASB-2014-E66J

Attorney for Defendant

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on the _25th_ day of August, 2006, I electronically filed the foregoing

with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing

to the following parties or counsel:

Terry Moorer

Office of the United States Attorney

One Court Square, Suite 201

Montgomery, AL 36104

/s/ JAY LEWIS

Law Offices of Jay Lewis, L.L.C.

P.O. Box 5059

Montgomery, Alabama 36103

(334) 263-7733 (Voice)

(334) 832-4390 (Fax)

J-Lewis@JayLewisLaw.com

ASB-2014-E66J

Attorney for Defendant

Case 2:06-cr-00200-WHA-CSC Document 34 Filed 08/25/2006 Page 2 of 2
Subpart 2014.2 - Solicitation of Bids    **Parent topic:** PART 2014 - SEALED BIDDING2014.201 Preparation of invitation for bids.2014.201-670 Solicitation provisions.       (a) The contracting officer may insert the provision at 2052.214-70, Prebid Conference, in Invitations for Bids (IFB) where there will be a prebid conference. This provision may be altered by the contracting officer to fit the circumstances of the procurement.          (b) The contracting officer may insert the provision at 2052.214-71, Bidder Qualifications and Past Experience in IFBs on an optional basis to fit the circumstances of the requirement;          (c) The contracting officer shall insert the provision at 2052.214-72 Bid Evaluation in all IFBs. Paragraph (f) of this provision is optional.          (d) The contracting officer shall insert the provision at 2052.214-73 Timely Receipt of Bids in all IFBs.          (e) The contracting officer shall insert the provision at 2052.214-74 Disposition of Bids in all IFBs.
§ 1022.11 Floodplain or wetland determination. ( a ) Concurrent with its review of a proposed action to determine appropriate NEPA or CERCLA process requirements, DOE shall determine the applicability of the floodplain management and wetland protection requirements of this part.
( b ) DOE shall determine whether a proposed action would be located within a base or critical action floodplain consistent with the most authoritative information available relative to site conditions from the following sources, as appropriate: ( 1 ) Flood Insurance Rate Maps or Flood Hazard Boundary Maps prepared by FEMA;
( 2 ) Information from a land-administering agency (*e.g.,* Bureau of Land Management) or from other government agencies with floodplain-determination expertise (*e.g.,* U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Natural Resources Conservation Service);
( 3 ) Information contained in safety basis documents as defined at 10 CFR part 830; and
( 4 ) DOE environmental documents, *e.g.,* NEPA and CERCLA documents.
( c ) DOE shall determine whether a proposed action would be located within a wetland consistent with the most authoritative information available relative to site conditions from the following sources, as appropriate: ( 1 ) U.S. Army Corps of Engineers “Wetlands Delineation Manual,” Wetlands Research Program Technical Report Y-87-1, January 1987, or successor document;
( 2 ) U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service National Wetlands Inventory or other government-sponsored wetland or land-use inventories;
( 3 ) U.S. Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service Local Identification Maps;
( 4 ) U.S. Geological Survey Topographic Maps; and
( 5 ) DOE environmental documents, *e.g.,* NEPA and CERCLA documents.
( d ) Pursuant to § 1022.5 of this part and paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section, DOE shall prepare: ( 1 ) A floodplain assessment for any proposed floodplain action in the base floodplain or for any proposed floodplain action that is a critical action located in the critical action floodplain; or
( 2 ) A wetland assessment for any proposed wetland action.