alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Reportof Greene County Bancshares, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterended June 30, 2003 (the “Report”), I, William F. Richmond, Senior VicePresident and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, to my knowledge, that:

 

(1)                                  TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Greene CountyBancshares, Inc. and will be retained by Greene County Bancshares, Inc. andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

 
|    Date: | August 6, 2003                                           |   | /s/ | William F. Richmond |   |
|-------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------|--------|-----|---------------------|--------|
|                    |  William F. Richmond                                |
|                    |  Senior Vice President and Chief Financial  Officer |

 

1

----
IV 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 280 

Celebrating Asian Pacific American Heritage Month. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 17, 2005 

Mr. TOM DAVIS of Virginia (for himself, Mr. DELAY, Mr. LEWIS of California, Ms. ROS-LEHTINEN, Mr. GARY G. MILLER of California, Mr. 

SHIMKUS, Mr. MARIO DIAZ-BALART of Florida, Mr. RANGEL, Mr. 

MORAN of Virginia, Mr. WILSON of South Carolina, Mr. MCDERMOTT, 

Mr. CROWLEY, Mr. ACKERMAN, Mr. ROHRABACHER, Mr. ROTHMAN, Mr. 

CASE, Mrs. MALONEY, Mr. VAN HOLLEN, Mr. PITTS, Mr. DUNCAN, Ms. 

EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON of Texas, Mr. SCOTT of Virginia, Mr. LEACH, 

Mr. BISHOP of Georgia, Mr. LANTOS, and Mr. LINCOLN DIAZ-BALART

of Florida) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Government Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Celebrating Asian Pacific American Heritage Month. 

Whereas the contributions of Asian Pacific Americans to our 

Nation have been historically significant; 

Whereas at the direction of Congress in 1978, the President 

proclaimed the week of May 4 through 10, 1979, as 

Asian Pacific American Heritage Week, to provide the 

people of the United States with an opportunity to recognize the achievements, contributions, history, and concerns of Asian Pacific Americans; 
2 

•HRES 280 IH 

Whereas this seven day period designated Asian Pacific Heritage Week intended to mark two historical dates—May 

7, 1843, when the first Japanese immigrants arrived in 

the United States, and May 10, 1869, Golden Spike Day, 

when, with substantial contributions from Chinese immigrants, the first transcontinental railroad was completed; 

Whereas in 1992, Congress by law designated that the month 

of May be annually observed as Asian Pacific American 

Heritage Month; 

Whereas according to the U.S. Census Bureau an estimated 

14.5 million United States residents trace their ethnic 

heritage, in full or in part, to Asia and the Pacific Islands; 

Whereas Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders can list innovative contributions to all aspects of life in the United 

States ranging from the first transcontinental railroad to 

the Internet; 

Whereas in the mid-1700’s Filipino sailors formed the first 

Asian American and Pacific Islander communities in the 

bayous of Louisiana; 

Whereas Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders have added 

to the vast cultural wealth of our Nation; and 

Whereas more than 300,000 Americans of Asian or Pacific 

Island heritage have bravely and honorably served to defend the United States in times of armed conflict from 

the Civil War to the present: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, by the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) recognizes that the United States draws its 

3 strength from its diversity, including contributions 

4 made by Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders; 
3 

•HRES 280 IH 

1 (2) recognizes that the Asian American and Pa2 cific Islander community is a thriving and integral 

3 part of American society and culture; 

4 (3) recognizes the prodigious contributions of 

5 Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders to the United 

6 States; and 

7 (4) supports the goals of Asian Pacific Amer8 ican Heritage Month. 

Æ
5116.603-3 Limitations.

The head of the contracting activity shall make the determination stated in FAR 16.603-3. See

Appendix GG for further delegation.

Parent topic: 5116.603 Letter contracts.
# Subpart 1832.1—Financing for Other Than a Commercial Purchase

**Parent topic:**PART 1832—CONTRACT FINANCING

## 1832.111 Contractor clauses for other than commercial purchases.

## 1832.111-70 NASA contract clause.

The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 1852.232–79, Payment for On-Site Preparatory Costs, in solicitations and contracts for construction on a fixed-price basis when progress payments are contemplated and pro rata payment of on-site preparatory costs to the contractor is appropriate.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

In the Matter of the Extradition of )

)

MARIA del ROSARIO MORENO-VAZQUES ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:06cv761-MEF

a/k/a MARIA COONLEY )

 ORDER

On June 11, 2008, the court held an evidentiary hearing on the petition for extradition.

At that time, the court informed the parties that additional briefs would be required.

Accordingly, as stated in open court, it is

ORDERED that on or before June 24, 2008, the parties shall file briefs addressing the

following issues:

1. What establishes and what is the nature of the father’s patria potestas?

2. What are the custodial rights of each parent? How are these rights created or

established?

3. What, if any, distinctions are there under Mexican law between custodial

rights and patria potestas?

It is further 

ORDERED that the parties may file reply briefs on or before July 1, 2008, at which

time this case will be deemed under submission.

Done this 12th day of June, 2008.

 /s/Charles S. Coody 

CHARLES S. COODY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-00761-CSC Document 37 Filed 06/12/2008 Page 1 of 1
Case 2:06-cv-00679-LES-CSC Document 3 Filed 08/10/2006 Page 1 of 1
2444.204 Contract clauses.

(a) Insert HUDAR clause 2452.244-70 Consent to Subcontract, in contracts and task orders with an

estimated value exceeding $10,000,000.

Parent topic: Subpart 2444.2 - Contract Clauses
Editorial Note on Part 37
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 37 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

§ 37.55 Security program review. ( a ) Each licensee shall be responsible for the continuing effectiveness of the security program. Each licensee shall ensure that the security program is reviewed to confirm compliance with the requirements of this subpart and that comprehensive actions are taken to correct any noncompliance that is identified. The review must include the radioactive material security program content and implementation. Each licensee shall periodically (at least annually) review the security program content and implementation.
( b ) The results of the review, along with any recommendations, must be documented. Each review report must identify conditions that are adverse to the proper performance of the security program, the cause of the condition(s), and, when appropriate, recommend corrective actions, and corrective actions taken. The licensee shall review the findings and take any additional corrective actions necessary to preclude repetition of the condition, including reassessment of the deficient areas where indicated.
( c ) The licensee shall maintain the review documentation for 3 years.
#### § 1705.02 Definitions.

The following terms used in these regulations are defined in the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. 552a(a): *agency, individual, maintain, record, system of records, statistical record,* and *routine use.* The Board's use of these terms conforms with the statutory definitions. References in this part to “the Act” refer to the Privacy Act of 1974.
Subpart 812.1 - Acquisition of Commercial

Items - General

Parent topic: PART 812 - ACQUISITION OF COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS AND COMMERCIAL

SERVICES

812.102 Applicability.

812.102-70 Applicability of Veterans preferences.

Based on the authority under 38 U.S.C. 8127 and 8128, the Veterans First Contracting Program in

subpart 819.70 applies to VA contracts under this part. The provisions and clauses prescribed reflect

agency unique statutes applicable to the acquisition of commercial items.
ex107.htm


    
      

      

    


    CONSEILS
GNM

    


    


    October
16, 2009

    


    Mr.
Daniel Trudeau

    President

    Anticus
Corporation Inc.

    1155,
boul René Lévesque Ouest,

    Suite
2500

    Montréal
(Québec)

    H3B
2K4

    


     

    Dear Mr.
Trudeau;

    


    Following
our discussions relating to your needs in accounting services.We are pleased to
present our understanding of your needs as well as our proposal to render the
services.

     

    Understanding of the
mandate

     

    Your
company wants to mandate our firm for the following services:

    


    
      	
              -

            	
              Monthly
      recording of accounting transactions based on documents and information
      that you will supply to us for both the publicly traded corporation and
      its Canadian subsidiary;

            


    

    


    
      	
              -

            	
              Monthly
      processing of payrolls with the required government
    reporting;

            


    

    


    
      	
              -  

            	
              Monthly
      GST / TVQ reporting as well as correspondence with the tax
      authorities;;

            


    

    


    -      Coordinate
with consultants for tax credit claims;

    


    
      	
              -

            	
              Prepare
      a monthly reporting package;

            


    

    


    
      	
              -

            	
              Prepare
      the files for the auditors, financial statements with accompanying notes
      on a quarterly and annual basis under
GAAP.

            


    

     

     

    
      
        
        

      

      
        1

        
          

        

      

      
        
        

      

    

    
      	
               
      

            	
               

            


    

    


    
      Our Fees

       
Based on our discussions and the information
received we will charge a monthly fee of 2 500$ beginning in October
2009.

     

    If you
agree with the following understanding of services to be provided and our fees,
please sign to confirm your agreement.

    


    If you
need further information please do not hesitate to contact us.

    


    Best
regards.

    


    /s/ Michel
Plante

    Michel
Plante

    


     

    I agree
with terms of this proposal:

    


    SIGNED :                   /s/ Daniel Trudeau

    


    TITLE :                     President


    


    DATE :                                                               

    



    
      
         


      

      
        2
13.003 Policy.     (e)(1) All items are candidates for automated solicitation, except that acquisitions for             services, for non-NSN items, and for requirements bought using delivery orders against             indefinite-delivery contracts are excluded. The criteria for exclusion of items for             automated evaluation or award are included in the functional specifications and managed             through automated procurement system internal controls. The Procurement Process Owner is             the approval authority for system changes to the automated procurement exclusion             capabilities. The HCA is the approval authority for exclusions for individual purchase             requests or materials from automated solicitation, evaluation, or award for each supply             chain. Individual purchase request or material exclusions will be recorded with a reason             for exclusion and reported monthly to DLA Acquisition Programs by each procuring             organization. The HCA must provide the determination to the DLA Acquisition Procurement             Process and Systems Division Chief for entry into the automated system.         (S-90) See 18.270 for thresholds associated             with emergency acquisition flexibilities. **Parent topic:** PART 13 – SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION PROCEDURES
```

[House Report 106-1007]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]

106th Congress                                                   Report
                        HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
 2d Session                                                    106-1007

======================================================================

 
WAIVING POINTS OF ORDER AGAINST THE CONFERENCE REPORT TO ACCOMPANY H.R. 
  2614, THE CERTIFIED DEVELOPMENT COMPANY PROGRAM IMPROVEMENTS ACT OF 
                                  2000

                                _______
                                

October 26 (legislative day, October 25), 2000.--Referred to the House 
                   Calendar and ordered to be printed

                                _______
                                

    Mr. Linder, from the Committee on Rules submitted the following

                              R E P O R T

                       [To accompany H. Res. 652]

    The Committee on Rules, having had under consideration 
House Resolution 652, by a non-record vote, report the same to 
the House with the recommendation that the resolution be 
adopted.

                SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS OF THE RESOLUTION

    The resolution waives all points of order against the 
conference report to accompany H.R. 2614, the Certified 
Development Company Program Improvements Act of 2000, and 
against its consideration. The rule further provides that the 
conference report shall be considered as read.

                                  

```
2803.1004 Contract clauses.       The information required to be inserted in the clause at FAR 52.203-14, Display of Hotline Poster(s), is the following: Office of the Inspector General, Fraud Detection Office, Attn: Poster Request, U.S. Department of Justice, 950 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20530.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 2803.10 - Contractor Code of Business Ethics and Conduct
Editorial Note on Part 31
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 31 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

§ 31.7 Luminous safety devices for use in aircraft. ( a ) A general license is hereby issued to own, receive, acquire, possess, and use tritium or promethium-147 contained in luminous safety devices for use in aircraft, provided each device contains not more than 10 curies of tritium or 300 millicuries of promethium-147 and that each device has been manufactured, assembled or initially transferred in accordance with a license issued under the provisions of § 32.53 of this chapter or manufactured or assembled in accordance with a specific license issued by an Agreement State which authorizes manufacture or assembly of the device for distribution to persons generally licensed by the Agreement State.
( b ) Persons who own, receive, acquire, possess or use luminous safety devices pursuant to the general license in this section are exempt from the requirements of parts 19, 20, and 21, of this chapter, except that they shall comply with the provisions of §§ 20.2201, and 20.2202 of this chapter.
( c ) This general license does not authorize the manufacture, assembly, repair or import of luminous safety devices containing tritium or promethium-147.
( d ) This general license does not authorize the export of luminous safety devices containing tritium or promethium-147.
( e ) This general license does not authorize the ownership, receipt, acquisition, possession or use of promethium-147 contained in instrument dials.
[30 FR 8189, June 26, 1965, as amended at 33 FR 6463, Apr. 27, 1968; 38 FR 22220, Aug. 17, 1973; 42 FR 28896, June 6, 1977; 43 FR 6922, Feb. 17, 1978; 56 FR 23471, May 21, 1991; 56 FR 61352, Dec. 3, 1991; 58 FR 67659, Dec. 22, 1993]
aspen123109exh101.htm -- Converted by SEC Publisher, created by BCL Technologies Inc., for SEC Filing





Exhibit 10.1

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION

     This EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT EXTENSION is entered to this 15th day of December, 2009, to be effective as of January 1, 2010 by and between ASPEN EXPLORATION CORPORATION, a public Delaware corporation, Suite 208, 2050 S. Oneida Street, Denver, CO 80224, (303) 639-9860 (“ASPEN”), and R. V. BAILEY, P.O. Box 1420 (current office is located at 515 Jerry St. but no mail is delivered to this address), Castle Rock, CO 80104, (303) 660-0966 (“BAILEY”), sometimes collectively referred to as the “Parties.”

WITNESSETH

     WHEREAS, ASPEN entered into an employment agreement with BAILEY effective as of January 1, 2009 which agreement was extended and, as extended will expire December 31, 2009 unless extended; and

     WHEREAS, ASPEN wishes to extend the existing Employment Agreement through March 31, 2010.

     NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the conditions and covenants set forth, it is agreed that the employment agreement with BAILEY effective as of January 1, 2009 be and hereby is amended, effective as of January 1, 2010, so that:

A.      Paragraph 1 (“EMPLOYMENT”) reads as follows:

1.    EMPLOYMENT: Effective as of January 1, 2010 ASPEN hereby employs BAILEY, and BAILEY hereby agrees to be employed by ASPEN in the capacity of Chief Executive Officer in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. BAILEY and ASPEN hereby agree that BAILEY shall be employed by ASPEN for a period from January 1, 2009 through March 31, 2010 (the “EMPLOYMENT PERIOD”) unless such employment is terminated at an earlier date as described in Section 6 of the existing Employment Agreement.

B.      Paragraph 4(b) (“LOCATION”) reads as follows:

(b)    During the term of this Agreement, BAILEY may continue to utilize office equipment (including computer equipment and accessories) that ASPEN owns and which are located at BAILEY’S office in Castle Rock, Colorado. Such equipment may be upgraded from time to time during the term of this Agreement. BAILEY may, at his option, purchase such office equipment from ASPEN at any time on or before December 31, 2009, for a total purchase price of $100.00.

C.      Except as specifically amended hereby the existing Employment Agreement remains in full force and effect.

			
	Employment Agreement R. V. BAILEY  	  	Page 1  








     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of Directors of ASPEN has approved this Agreement by resolutions dated December 15, 2009, and the Parties have executed this Agreement to be effective as of the first day of January 2010.

ASPEN EXPLORATION CORPORATION

By: _/s/ Kevan Hensman__________________

Kevan Hensman, Chief Financial Officer

Date: December 8, 2009

EMPLOYEE

By: _/s/ R.V. Bailey______________________

R. V. Bailey, Employee

Date: December 15, 2009

			
	Employment Agreement R. V. BAILEY  	  	Page 2
Case 1:06-cr-00170-WHA-CSC Document 443 Filed 05/24/07 Page 1 of 6
Case 1:06-cr-00170-WHA-CSC Document 443 Filed 05/24/07 Page 2 of 6
Case 1:06-cr-00170-WHA-CSC Document 443 Filed 05/24/07 Page 3 of 6
Case 1:06-cr-00170-WHA-CSC Document 443 Filed 05/24/07 Page 4 of 6
Case 1:06-cr-00170-WHA-CSC Document 443 Filed 05/24/07 Page 5 of 6
Case 1:06-cr-00170-WHA-CSC Document 443 Filed 05/24/07 Page 6 of 6
exv10w19








EXHIBIT 10.19




Base
Salaries and Bonus Potential  for Fiscal Year 2010, Cash Bonuses for
Fiscal Year 2009 and 2010 Equity Compensation Awards for Named
Executive Officers




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	Stock	 	Restricted
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	Option(1)	 	Stock
	 	 	2010	 	2009	 	Grant	 	Award(2)
	Name and Title	 	Salary	 	Bonus	 	(shares)	 	(shares)
	N. Anthony Coles, M.D. (3)

President and Chief Executive Officer
	 	$	676,000	 	 	$	780,000	 	 	 	147,000	 	 	 	21,000	 
	 
	Matthew K. Fust (3)

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
	 	$	434,700	 	 	$	219,000	 	 	 	45,500	 	 	 	6,500	 
	 	 
	Judy Batlin (3)

Vice President of Organizational Learning,
Development, and Human Resources
	 	$	329,100	 	 	$	129,000	 	 	 	31,500	 	 	 	4,500	 
	 	 
	Laura Brege (3)

Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer
	 	$	475,200	 	 	$	244,000	 	 	 	56,000	 	 	 	8,000	 
	 	 
	Juergen Lasowski (3)

Senior Vice President, Corporate Development
	 	$	391,000	 	 	$	180,000	 	 	 	42,000	 	 	 	6,000	 








 




			
	(1)	 	One-eighth of the shares subject to the stock options will vest on the six month
anniversary of the date of grant and the remaining shares will vest in equal monthly
installments over the following 42 months.
	 
	(2)	 	One-third of the shares subject to the restricted stock award will vest on the one year
anniversary of the date of grant and the remaining shares will vest in two equal
installments on the second and third anniversaries of the date of grant.
	 
	(3)	 	The 2010 bonus potential percentage remained at 100% for N. Anthony Coles. For
each of the other named executive officers, the 2010 bonus potential was increased by 5% to 50%, 40%, 50% and 45%,
respectively, of their 2010 annual salaries.
§ 20.2402 Criminal penalties. ( a ) Section 223 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, provides for criminal sanctions for willful violation of, attempted violation of, or conspiracy to violate, any regulation issued under sections 161b, 161i, or 161o of the Act. For purposes of section 223, all the regulations in §§ 20.1001 through 20.2402 are issued under one or more of sections 161b, 161i, or 161o, except for the sections listed in paragraph (b) this section.
( b ) The regulations in §§ 20.1001 through 20.2402 that are not issued under Sections 161b, 161i, or 161o for the purposes of Section 223 are as follows: §§ 20.1001, 20.1002, 20.1003, 20.1004, 20.1005, 20.1006, 20.1007, 20.1008, 20.1009, 20.1405, 20.1704, 20.1903, 20.1905, 20.2002, 20.2007, 20.2301, 20.2302, 20.2401, and 20.2402.
[57 FR 55071, Nov. 24, 1992, as amended at 62 FR 39089, July 21, 1997]
Editorial Note on Part 2
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

§ 2.819 Denial of application for failure to supply information. ( a ) The Commission may deny an application for a standard design certification if an applicant fails to respond to a request for additional information within 30 days from the date of the request, or within such other time as may be specified.
( b ) If the Commission denies an application because the applicant has failed to respond in a timely fashion to a request for additional information, the NRC will publish in the Federal Register a notice of denial and will notify the applicant with a simple statement of the grounds of denial. If a notice of receipt of application, advance notice of proposed rulemaking, or notice of proposed rulemaking for a standard design certification was published on the NRC Web site, then the notice of action on the denial will also be published on the NRC Web site.
[72 FR 49482, Aug. 28, 2007]
#### The People of the State of New York ex rel. Willard R. Messick, Appellant, v. Peter R. Sorensen, as Buffalo Area Director of New York State Division of Parole, Respondent.

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Contrary to the statement of Special Term, we find that the Clinton County Judge did make a reviewable record. A question of fact was presented as to whether or not defendant was armed at the time of the commission of the crime. We find that habeas corpus was a proper remedy. *(People ex rel. Romano*v. *Brophy,*280 N. Y. 181 and 707.) (Appeal from judgment of Erie Special Term dismissing writ of habeas corpus.) Present—-Goldman, P. J., Marsh, Witmer, Moule and Bastow, JJ.