alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Promissory Note dated March 7, 2005



 Exhibit 10(z) 
 PROMISSORY NOTE 
  

			
	$10,000,000	 	March 7, 2005    
		 	Santa Ana, California

 For
value received, The First American Corporation, a California corporation (“Maker”), promises to pay to the order of First American Home Buyers Protection Corporation, a California corporation (“Payee”), at 7833 Haskell Avenue,
Van Nuys, California 91406, the principal sum of Ten Million Dollars ($10,000,000.00), and to pay interest on the balance of principal remaining from time-to-time outstanding and unpaid from March 7, 2005, until paid, at the rate of four
percent (4.00%) per annum. Principal and interest shall be paid in lawful money of the United States of America and in immediately available funds. 
 Said principal and interest shall be due and payable in equal quarterly installments in the amount of Two Hundred Twenty-two Thousand Four Hundred Forty-four and Forty-eight Hundredths Dollars
($222,444.48) commencing on the 7th day of June 2005, with quarterly payments continuing thereafter, until March 7, 2020, when the entire unpaid balance of principal, together with all accrued interest thereon remaining unpaid, shall be due and
payable in full. 
 Each payment made on this note shall be applied first to accrued interest, and the balance thereof shall be
applied to installments of principal then due or to become due hereunder in the order of their maturity. This note may be prepaid at any time or times in whole or in part, without notice or penalty. Prepayments of principal shall be applied in the
order of maturity. Principal that is prepaid shall cease to bear interest from the date of prepayment. 
 Should interest not be
so paid, it shall thereafter bear like interest as the principal, but such unpaid interest so compounded shall not exceed an amount equal to simple interest on the unpaid principal at the maximum rate permitted by law. Should default be made in the
payment of any








 
installment of interest or principal when due, all unpaid principal and accrued interest shall become immediately due and payable at the option of the holder of this note. Should suit be
commenced or an attorney be employed to enforce the payment of this note, Maker agrees to pay such additional sum as the court may adjudge reasonable as attorneys’ fees in said suit. 
 This note is made under, and shall be construed and enforced in accordance with, the laws of the State of California. 
  

			
	THE FIRST AMERICAN CORPORATION
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Parker S. Kennedy

		 	Parker S. Kennedy, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Mark R Arnesen

		 	Mark R Arnesen, Secretary
EXHIBIT 32.2 - CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
               PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b)



In connection with the Quarter Report of Gallery of History, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Rod Lynam, Chief Financial Office of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:

1.	 The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.	The information contained in the Report fairly presentes, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



/s/ Rod Lynam
-------------
Rod Lynam
Chief Financial Officer

May 13, 2005




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company
and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

**COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,**

**Respondent**

**v.**

**ERIC NIGEL TAULTON,**

**Petitioner :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 284 MAL 2016** 

**Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 18th day of October, 2016, the Petition for A llowance of Appeal** 

**is** DENIED

**.**
3019.708-70 Solicitation provision and

contract clauses.

(a) The contracting officer shall insert the clause at (HSAR) 48 CFR 3052.219–71, DHS MentorProtégé Program in all solicitations that anticipate the need for a subcontracting plan.

(b) The contracting officer shall insert the provision at (HSAR) 48 CFR 3052.219–72, Evaluation of

Prime Contractor Participation in the DHS Mentor-Protégé Program, in all solicitations containing

(HSAR) 48 CFR 3052.219–71, DHS Mentor-Protégé Program and (FAR) 48 CFR 52.219–9, Small

Business Subcontracting Plan.

Parent topic: Subpart 3019.7—The Small Business Subcontracting Program
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

 )

 v. ) CR. NO. 03:06cr208-MEF

 )

JASON EDWARD COFIELD )

UNOPPOSED MOTION TO CONTINUE TRIAL

Comes now the United States of America, by and through Leura G. Canary, United States

Attorney for the Middle District of Alabama, and moves this Honorable Court to continue the trial

of this matter currently set for April 23, 2007, until November 5, 2007. In support thereof, the

United States submits the following:

1) Trial of this matter is set for April 23, 2007. 

2) Currently, this Honorable Court has pending before it the United States’ Objection

to the Magistrate Judge Regarding Suppression of Physical Evidence. This Honorable Court has

yet to rule upon the United States’ objection. 

3) Beginning on April 11, 2007, the Government’s key witness in this case, Investigator

Keith Jordan, will be out of District and unavailable for trial. He will not return to the Middle

District of Alabama until November 2007. 

4) By agreement of both parties, Cofield has been released from custody subject to

electronic monitoring and conditions set by this Honorable Court.

5) By agreement of both parties, the United States respectfully requests that this

Honorable Court continue the trial of this matter until November 5, 2007, thereby giving the Court

ample time to review complex issues currently pending before it, and accommodating Investigator

Case 3:06-cr-00208-MEF-CSC Document 62 Filed 03/15/2007 Page 1 of 3
Jordan’s need to be out of the Middle District of Alabama until that time.

6) The undersigned has discussed this Motion with Attorney Pate DeBardeleben. Mr.

DeBardeleben has no objection to this Motion.

Respectfully submitted this 15th day of March, 2007.

LEURA G. CANARY

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

/s/ Verne H. Speirs

VERNE H. SPEIRS

Assistant United States Attorney

1 Court Square, Suite 201

Montgomery, Alabama 36104

(334) 223-7280

(334) 223-7135 Fax

verne.speirs@usdoj.gov

Case 3:06-cr-00208-MEF-CSC Document 62 Filed 03/15/2007 Page 2 of 3
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

 )

 v. ) CR. NO. 3:06cr208-MEF

)

JASON EDWARD COFIELD )

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on March 15, 2007, I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of

the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing to Pate

DeBardeleben.

Respectfully submitted,

 

LEURA G. CANARY

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

/s/ Verne H. Speirs

VERNE H. SPEIRS

Assistant United States Attorney

1 Court Square, Suite 201

Montgomery, Alabama 36104

(334) 223-7280

(334) 223-7135 Fax

verne.speirs@usdoj.gov

Case 3:06-cr-00208-MEF-CSC Document 62 Filed 03/15/2007 Page 3 of 3
AFFIRM; Opinion issued October 30, 2012

In The 

## !1nurt ofAppratfi 

## 3Fiftt iztrkt of irxa at attaa No. 05-12-00535-CR FRANCISCO ANTONIO ONTIVEROS, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, 

### Appdllee On Appeal from the 204th Judicial District Court 

### I)allas County, Texas _________



### Trial Court Cause No. F10-62236-Q MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Morris, Francis, and Murphy OpinionBy Justice Francis Francisco Antonio Ontiveros waived ajury andpleaded guiltyto aggravatedrobbery with
a deadly weapon, a baseball bat. The trial court assessedpunishment for twenty years inprison. On appeal, appellants attorney filed a brief in which she concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The 

### briefmeets the requirements ofAnders v. CaIi/àrnia. 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The briefpresents a professional evaluation ofthe record showing why. 

### in effect. there are 

### no arguable grounds to advance. See high 

### v. State. 573 

### S.W.2d 807. 811 

### (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.j 1978). 

### Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant. We 

### advised appellant ofhis rightto file apro se response. hut 

### he didnotfile apro se response.We have revie\ed the record and counsels brief. See BleLsoe v. S/ate. 178 S.W.3d 824. 827 (Tex, Crim. App. 2005) (explaining appellate court’s duty in 

### Anders cases). 

### We agree the appeal is frivolous and without merit. We {ind nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal. We affirmthe trial courtsjudgment. 

# ‘‘thLt4 M1) .LY FRAI’JCIS TUc [ICE Do Not Publish TEX. R. App. P. 47 120535F.U05

-2-

## jfittlj JOItrict at

## Z1tcxa at atta JUDGMENT FRANCISCO ANTONIO ONTIVEROS. Appellant No. 05-12-00535-CR V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellec Appeal from the 204th Judicial District Court ofDallas County. Texas (Tr.Ct.No. F10-62236-Q). Opinion delivered by Justice Francis, Justices Morris andMurphyparticipating.

Based on the Courts opinion ofthis date. the trial courts judgment is AFFIRMED. Judgment entered October 30, 2012.

FRS JUST1C 

### Qtonrt of 1pptat
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 242 (Friday, December 17, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 79071]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-31704]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary


Aviation Proceedings, Agreements Filed the Week Ending November 
6, 2010

    The following Agreements were filed with the Department of 
Transportation under the Sections 412 and 414 of the Federal Aviation 
Act, as amended (49 U.S.C. 1382 and 1384) and procedures governing 
proceedings to enforce these provisions. Answers may be filed within 21 
days after the filing of the application.
    Docket Number: DOT-OST-2010-0275.
    Date Filed: November 4, 2010.
    Parties: Members of the International Air Transport Association.
    Subject: Mail Vote 649--Resolution 010f. TC3 Within South East Asia 
Special Passenger Amending Resolution 010f Fares between Chinese Taipel 
and Viet Nam Memo 1411. Intended effective date: 15 November 2010.

Renee V. Wright,
Program Manager, Docket Operations, Federal Register Liaison.
[FR Doc. 2010-31704 Filed 12-16-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P
February 10, 2012

Mr. Greg Crum Director of Operations

Southwest Airlines Co.

Love Field

P.O. Box 36611 Dallas, TX 75235-1611

Dear Mr. Crum:

This is in response to your December 16, 2011 letter sent to the public docket (No. FAA2011-1390) petitioning the Federal Aviation Administ ration on behalf of Southwest Airlines Co. (Southwest) for an exemption from § 121.291(d) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). That exemption, if gran ted, would allow Southwest to defer the date by which the simulated ditching demonstration must be completed for the Boeing 737-700 aircraft acquired as a result of the merger with AirTran Airways.

This project is being combined with the petition submitted by Southwest on November 22, 2011, requesting an exemption from § 121.291(b) of 14 CFR. That exemption, if granted, would allow Southwest to defer the date by which the demonstration of emergency evacuation procedures for the Boeing 717 aircraft acquired as a result of the merger with AirTran Airways.

Please refer to public docket No. FAA-2011-1329 for any status updates or decision regarding these petitions. Docket No. FAA-2011-1390 will be closed.

Sincerely,

/s/ Ida M. Klepper Manager, Airmen and Airspace Rules Division
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

)

BUDDY GILL )

)

Plaintiff, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.: 1:06-CV-718

-vs- )

)

)

SORRELLS FUNERAL HOME, INC.; et al. )

)

Defendants. )

)

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

COMES NOW Andy Nelms to enter his appearance as the attorney for Plaintiff herein

and respectfully requests of the Court and all parties that he be served with process and all

needful papers.

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED on this the 14

th day of September, 2006.

/s/ Andy Nelms

ANDY NELMS

ASB-6972-E63K

Attorney for Plaintiff

OF COUNSEL:

LAW OFFFICES OF JAY LEWIS, LLC.

P.O. Box 5059

Montgomery, AL 36103

(334) 263-7733

(334) 832-4390 (Fax)

Andynelms@jaylewislaw.com

Case 1:06-cv-00718-MHT-SRW Document 10 Filed 09/15/2006 Page 1 of 2
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on September 14, 2006, I electronically filed the foregoing document

with the Clerk of this Court via the CM/ECF system, which will send notification of such filing

to the following:

Elizabeth B. Glasgow

FARMER, PRICE, HORNSBY & WEATHERFORD, LLP.

100 Adris Place

P.O. Drawer 2228

Dothan, Alabama 36302

(334) 793-2424

(334) 793-6624

eglasgow@fphw-law.com

S. Mark Andrews

MORRIS, CARY, ANDREWS, TALMADGE & JONES, LLC.

P.O. Box 1649

(334) 792-1420

(334) 673-0077

mandrews@mcatlaw.com

/s/ Andy Nelms

OF COUNSEL

Case 1:06-cv-00718-MHT-SRW Document 10 Filed 09/15/2006 Page 2 of 2
#### § 948.57 Failure to nominate.

If nominations are not made pursuant to the provisions of § 948.56 by the date provided therein, the Secretary may, without regard to nominations, select members and alternates on the basis of the representation provided for in this part.
AP9 R04-30-92 S:\FormsLib\Civil Bureau\Civil Courts & Post Judgment\Post Trial\Appeal Status Card Revised 01-18-2013

RDATE 3/26/2015

 NOTICE OF APPEALS

ASSIGNMENT OF COURT OF APPEALS

TO: 1ST COURT OF APPEALS 

From: Deputy Clerk: MICHELLE LOPEZ

 Chris Daniel, District Clerk

Harris County, T E X A S

CAUSE: 2010-21712 

VOLUME PAGE OR IMAGE # 64463315

DUE 4/3/2015 ATTORNEY 20981000

NOTICE OF APPEAL HAS BEEN ASSIGNED TO THE 1ST

DATE JUDGMENT SIGNED: 2/27/2015 

MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL DATE FILED n/a

REQUEST TRANSCRIPT DATE FILED n/a

NOTICE OF APPEAL DATE FILED 3/25/2015

NUMBER OF DAYS: ( CLERKS RECORD ) 10

FILE ORDERED: YES NO IMAGED FILED: YES NO 

CODES FOR NOTICE OF APPEAL: D, OA

CHRIS DANIEL 

Harris County, District Clerk

By: /s/MICHELLE LOPEZ 

 MICHELLE LOPEZ, Deputy

BC NOTICE OF APPEAL FILED

BG NOTICE OF APPEAL FILED – GOVERNMENT

C JUDGMENT BEING APPEALED

D - ACCELERATED APPEAL

OA NO CLERK’S RECORD REQUEST FILED

O CLERK’S RECORD REQUEST FILED (W/NOTICE OF APPEAL)

NA AMENDED NOTICE OF APPEAL

 FILED IN 1st COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 3/26/2015 3:15:02 PM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk



JWEB INT 65.10 CIVIL SYSTEM│CIVIL CASE INTAKE LOPEZ, MICHELLE ASHLEY │ MARCH 26, 2015 INT65.10

(2) CONNECTION(S) FOUND.

CASE NUM: PJN: TRANS NUM: CURRENT COURT:

CASE TYPE: CASE STATUS:

STYLE: VS

PJN PER/CONN NO COC BAR PERSON NAME

gfedcb

gfedcb

Submit Query 1 Total Pages Submit Query Submit Query Submit Query Submit Query 1 6 Submit Query Submit Query Submit Query Submit Query

INACTIVE ATY INQ ACT ENTRY ISS SERV DOC 

PTY ADDR

Harris County Information Technology Center (ITC) Justice Applications 

Harris County (JWEB) Justice Applications (INT6510) Page 1 of 1

http://civil.jweb.harriscountytx.gov/INT/INT6510.aspx?GV_CASE_NUM=201021712 3/26/2015
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: March 31, 2008
    /s/ Robert K. MoskovitzName:
    Robert K. MoskovitzTitle:
    Chief Financial Officer of the General Partner
#### § 1016.9 Processing security facility approval.

Following receipt of an acceptable request for security facility approval, the DOE will perform an initial security survey of the permittee's facility to determine that granting a security facility approval would be consistent with the national security. If DOE makes such a determination, security facility approval will be granted. If not, security facility approval will be withheld pending compliance with the security survey recommendations or until a waiver is granted pursuant to § 1016.6.

[82 FR 41506, Sept. 1, 2017]
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 10, 2019

b0904 

# Order

Clerk September 10, 2019

158200

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 158200

COA: 335860

Macomb CC: 2013

- 003648

- FC

THOMAS WILLIAM WOOTEN,

Defendant

- Appellant.

________________________________________/

By order of February 4, 2019, the application for leave to appeal the June 12, 2018

judgment of the Court of Appe als was held in abeyance pending the decision in Gamble v

United States (Docket No. 17

- 646). On order of the Court, the case having been decided

on June 17, 2019, 587 US ___ (2019), the application is again considered, and it is

DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed

by this Court.
623.506 Suspension of payments,

termination of contract, and debarment and

suspension actions.

(e) The authority to approve the determination prescribed in FAR 23.506(e) is reserved to the

Secretary of State.

Parent topic: Subpart 623.5—Drug-Free Workplace
Exhibit
      32.1





CERTIFICATION
      OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
      ACT
      OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Simclar, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
      10-Q/A for the period ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Barry J. Pardon,
      President of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for
      purpose of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that
      to
      the best of my knowledge:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





This
      Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, “filed” with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission.








/s/
                Barry J. PardonBarry
                J. Pardon, President
              Simclar,
                Inc.
              July
                2, 2007
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                            4371
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      104
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  4625
<PP&E>                                           62867
<DEPRECIATION>                                   20732
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   46760
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             1040
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                       45720
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     46760
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  8119
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     2535
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  2005
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   3579
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               3579
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      3579
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    12.80
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    12.80
        

</TABLE>
1902.101 Definitions.

As used throughout this regulation, the following words and terms are used as defined in this

subpart unless (a) the context in which they are used clearly requires a different meaning or (b) a

different definition is prescribed for a particular part or portion of a part.

Board means the Broadcasting Board of Governors, acting through any of its duty authorized

officials.

Board Procurement Executive means the Director, Office of Contracts.

AR/CO means Authorized Representative of the Contracting Officer (see 1942.202-70).

Contracting activity means the Office of Contracts, which has the responsibility to contract for the

acquisition of supplies and services (including construction).

Head of the Board (also called Board head) means the Board Director or Deputy Director; and the

term authorized representative means any person, persons or board (other than the contracting

officer) authorized to act for the Head of the Board.

Purchasing Activity means an office with one or more Level I or Level II Small Purchases

Contracting Officer(s) exercising limited redelegations of contracting officer authority.

BBG means the Broadcating Board of Governors.

Parent topic: Subpart 1902.1 - Definitions