alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

 v. ) CR. NO. 2:06-cr-200-WHA 

)

ROSA E. RINCON )

O R D E R

Upon consideration of the Motion for Leave to Dismiss Remaining Count of the Indictment

as to Rosa E. Rincon, heretofore filed in the above styled cause, and for good cause shown, the

Court is of the opinion that the motion should be and the same hereby is granted. It is, therefore,

CONSIDERED, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED by the Court that said motion be and

the same is hereby granted.

DONE this 19th day of December, 2006.

 /s/ W. Harold Albritton 

 W. HAROLD ALBRITTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

DISMISSAL OF COUNT ONE OF THE INDICTMENT

Comes now the United States of America with leave of the Court first had and obtained and

dismisses the remaining count one of the Indictment heretofore filed in the above styled cause as to

Rosa E. Rincon.

Respectfully submitted,

LEURA GARRETT CANARY

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

/s/ Christopher A. Snyder

CHRISTOPHER A. SNYDER

Assistant United States Attorney

Post Office Box 197

Montgomery, Alabama 36101-0197

334.223.7280

334.223.7135 fax

christopher.a.snyder@usdoj.gov

Case 2:06-cr-00200-WHA-CSC Document 93 Filed 12/19/2006 Page 1 of 1
407.503 Policy.       (a) HCA's shall establish procedures to ensure that requesting activities provide the written determination required by FAR 7.503(e), when submitting requests for procurement of services.          (b) In the event of a disagreement as to whether the functions to be performed are inherently governmental, the HCA may refer the matter to the Senior Procurement Executive (SPE) for resolution. When submitting disagreements to the SPE for resolution the HCA shall provide a summary of the areas of disagreement, supported by the following:          (1) The HCA's assessment of whether the services are “inherently governmental”;          (2) The basis for that assessment (include references to the definition and policy in FAR subpart 7.5 and/or Office of Federal Procurement Policy letter 92-1);          (3) A copy of the statement of work; and,          (4) The requesting activity's written determination in accordance with FAR 7.503(e).          (c) Such disagreements shall be resolved prior to issuance of the solicitation.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 407.5 - Inherently Governmental Functions
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Christine A. Reuther and Ani Marie :

Diakatos, : Appellants :

:

v. : No. 1365 C.D. 2017

: Delaware County Bureau of Elections and :

Christine Rossi :

O R D E R

AND NOW, this 7th day of November , 2017, it is ordered that the

Opinion filed on October 26, 2017, shall be designated OPINION rather than

MEMORANDUM OPINION, and that it shall be reported.

P. KEVIN BROBSON, Judge
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Joseph H. McCretton, Appellant.

Order unanimously modified in accordance with Memorandum and as modified affirmed. Memorandum: On his plea of guilty to murder, second degree, in 1951 defendant received a sentence of 60 years to life. Within a short period after his admission to Attica Prison he was transferred to Dannemora State Hospital and has spent a substantial period of his incarceration in that and similar institutions for the criminally insane. In his *coram nobis*petition defendant urges that he was insane at the time of the commission of the homicide and requests a hearing on this issue. Testimony was taken at the hearing relating solely to determining whether defendant "was in such a mental condition that he could understand the proceedings.” Defendant contended that he could understand the proceedings and insisted upon his right to a hearing on his petition. He testified in his own behalf and a reading of his testimony impresses us that he gave no indication that his mental condition was so impaired as to prevent him from understanding the proceedings. The record further indicates that six weeks before the hearing the examining psychiatrist at Dannemora expressed the opinion that defendant "was in such a condition that he could participate in a hearing.” The People admit this but put into evidence the affidavits of two of the hospital’s psychiatrists asserting that an examination approximately three weeks before the hearing date demonstrated that defendant was not of such mentality as to assist in his own behalf at the hearing. These affidavits were the usual printed forms used at Dannemora with typed inserts referring specifically to defendant. There was, of course, no opportunity for cross-examination of the psychiatrists and Special Term stated that it felt bound by the affidavits, and upon the authority of *People*v. *Booth*(17 N Y 2d 681) and *People*v. *Harrison*(28 A D 2d 1097) remanded defendant to Dannemora for further treatment, without prejudice to a renewal of the *coram nobis*hearing immediately upon the opinion of the psychiatrists of the institution that he could understand the nature of the proceedings. The record and all the circumstances surrounding this defendant require, in the interests of justice, an examination by one or more duly qualified psychiatrists not members of the Dannemora staff to determine defendant’s competency to participate in the *coram nobis*proceedings. The People should make the necessary arrangements for such examination at the earliest date, after which another hearing should be held in Ontario Supreme Court to review the matter and to make such an order as the proof requires. (Appeal from order of Ontario Special Term, holding *coram nobis*hearing in abeyance.) Present—Goldman, P. J., Del Vecchio, Gabrielli, Moule and Henry, JJ.
8.003 Use of other mandatory sources.

(S-90) Procurement of audit readiness or audit sustainment services.

DCSO is responsible for acquiring audit readiness and/or audit sustainment services for DLA

organizations. No other procuring organization shall award a contract or place an order on an

existing contract for audit readiness and/or audit sustainment services for a DLA organization

without the written approval of the DCSO Director. In addition, no DLA requirements owner shall

submit a requirement for audit readiness and/or audit sustainment services for a DLA organization

to a non-DLA contracting organization (e.g., an order under the Economy Act, as provided under

FAR 17.502-2) without the written approval of the DCSO Director.

(S-91) DCSO is the single DLA procuring organization with authority to procure office document

devices and associated maintenance support (see 39.9001 (b)).

(S-92) DCSO is the primary procuring organization responsible for acquiring information technology

(IT) services, supplies, equipment, training, and subscriptions for DLA (see 39.9001 (c)).

(S-93) Procurement of training.

(1) Pursuant to Director, DLA Human Resources memorandum entitled, “Centralizing Administration

of Government Purchase Cards for Training Payment,” dated June 30, 2014, DLA organizations shall

submit all training requirements, regardless of the training source or funding source, to DLA Human

Resources Services, DLA Training (DHRS-DT) for review, management, administration, and

sourcing. If DHRS-DT determines the training requirement is valid, DHRS-DT will then determine

the best method to source that training (e.g., LMS Online course, Resident Course with DLA

trainers, DAU Course, GPC, new contract, etc.).

(2) DCSO Columbus is the DLA Center of Excellence for DLA Enterprise Training Services. If DHRSDT determines a new contract is the best method to satisfy the training requirement, DHRS-DT will

work with the requiring activity to prepare a requirements package and submit the request for

contract support to DCSO Columbus in coordination with the requiring activity, unless

8.003(S-93)(3) applies.

(3) DLA organizations shall not submit requirements for training services to any procuring

organization other than DCSO unless DHRS-DT determines in writing that a non-DCSO procuring

organization should provide the contracting support and the DCSO Director approves the

determination in writing.

Parent topic: PART 8 – REQUIRED SOURCES OF SUPPLIES AND SERVICES
Subpart 1528.3 - Insurance

Parent topic: PART 1528 - BONDS OF INSURANCE

1528.301 Insurance liability to third persons.

Contracting officers shall insert the clause at 1552.228-70, Insurance Liability to Third Persons, in

cost-reimbursement solicitations and contracts, except those for construction and architect-engineer

services.

Note:

This clause may be used in contracts awarded utilizing architect-engineer services such as

requirements for Superfund cleanups (e.g., response action contracts). The clause does not apply to

Superfund indemnification for third party pollution liability or coverage for commercial pollution

liability insurance as prescribed by section 119 of CERCLA as amended by SARA.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000
<CURRENCY>                                        U.S.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           1,819
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      931
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      1,373
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 4,236
<PP&E>                                           3,459
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,321
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   5,925
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,416
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      2,250
<COMMON>                                            13
<OTHER-SE>                                       2,084
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     5,925
<SALES>                                          1,375
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,388
<CGS>                                              784
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,072
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    21
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (489)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (489)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (489)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>
§ 1015.102 Definitions and construction. ( a ) For the purposes of the standards in this part, the terms “claim” and “debt” are synonymous and interchangeable. They refer to an amount of money, funds, or property that has been determined by an agency official to be due the United States from any person, organization, or entity, except another Federal agency. For the purposes of administrative offset under 31 U.S.C. 3716, the terms “claim” and “debt” include an amount of money, funds, or property owed by a person to a State (including past-due support being enforced by a State), the District of Columbia, American Samoa, Guam, the United States Virgin Islands, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, or the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico.
( b ) A debt is “delinquent” if it has not been paid by the date specified in DOE's initial written demand for payment or applicable agreement or instrument (including a post-delinquency payment agreement), unless other satisfactory payment arrangements have been made.
( c ) In this part, words in the plural form shall include the singular and vice versa, and words signifying the masculine gender shall include the feminine and vice versa. The terms “includes” and “including” do not exclude matters not listed but do include matters that are in the same general class.
( d ) Recoupment is a special method for adjusting debts arising under the same transaction or occurrence. For example, obligations arising under the same contract generally are subject to recoupment.
( e ) The term “Department of Energy” or “DOE” includes the National Nuclear Security Administration.
Subpart 622.3—Contract Work Hours and

Safety Standards Act

Parent topic: PART 622—APPLICATION OF LABOR LAWS TO GOVERNMENT ACQUISITIONS

622.302 Liquidated damages and overtime pay.

The authority to make the determination prescribed in FAR 22.302(c) is delegated, without power of

redelegation, to the head of the contracting activity.
###### Editorial Note on Subpart A of Part 989

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 989 appear at 83 FR 53973, Oct. 26, 2018.

#### § 989.84 Disposition limitation.

No handler shall dispose of standard raisins, off-grade raisins, or other failing raisins, except in accordance with the provisions of this subpart or pursuant to regulations issued by the Committee.

[83 FR 53972, Oct. 26, 2018]
Exhibit 33.4b



|     |  |  |                                 |                                
|---- |  |  | ------------------------------- | -------------------------------
|LOGO |  |  |                                 | 260 Interstate North Circle, SE
|     |  |  | Atlanta, GA 30339              
|     |  |  | T 770.763-4000
www.assurant.com

February 4, 2019

REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH

§1122 (d)(2)(vi), §1122(d)(4)(xi) and §1122(d)(4)(xii)

of REGULATION AB SERVICING CRITERIA

FOR THE REPORTING PERIOD

JANUARY 1, 2018 TO DECEMBER 31, 2018

American Security Insurance Company, Standard Guaranty Insurance Company and TrackSure Insurance Agency, Inc. (collectively, the Asserting Party)
is responsible for assessing compliance for the period of January 1, 2018 through December 31, 2018 (the Reporting Period) with the servicing criteria set forth in §1122(d)(2)(vi), §1122(d)(4)(xi) and
§1122(d)(4)(xii) of Title 17, §229.1122(d) of the Code of Federal Regulations, (the Applicable Servicing Criteria) which the Asserting Party has concluded are applicable to the insurance escrow servicing activities it performs
with respect to all mortgage backed securities transactions that were registered after January 1, 2006 with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933 (the Platform Transactions). The Asserting
Party used the criteria set forth in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB to assess the compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.

The Asserting Party has assessed its compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria for the Reporting Period and has concluded that the Asserting Party has
complied, in all material respects, with the Applicable Servicing Criteria for the Reporting Period with respect to the Platform Transaction.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on the assessment of compliance with the
Applicable Servicing Criteria as of and for the Reporting Period.

American Security Insurance Company

Standard Guaranty Insurance Company

TrackSure
Insurance Agency, Inc.



|                                                                                                                                                                     
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ John Frobose                                                                                                                                                     
|By: John Frobose President of American Security
Insurance Company And Standard Guaranty Insurance Company, and
Sr. Vice President of TrackSure Insurance Agency, Inc.
|                                                                                                                                                                     
|Date: 2/4/2019
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, EASTERN DIVISION

CINCINNATI INSURANCE )

COMPANY, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

v. ) 3:06cv733-MHT

) 

JOSEPH DONALD PRATHER )

and LINDA PRATHER, )

)

Defendants. )

CONSENT JUDGMENT

The parties have entered into an agreement concerning

this matter. THEREFORE, it is ORDERED and DECLARED as

follows:

(1) There is insurance coverage for the listed insured

Tracy Swader, the daughter of the named insureds.

(2) There is no insurance coverage for Jason Swader,

the son-in-law of the named insureds. 

Case 3:06-cv-00733-MHT-TFM Document 34 Filed 11/19/2007 Page 1 of 2
(3) The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this

document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant

to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

DONE, this the 19th day of November, 2007.

 /s/ Myron H. Thompson 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

APPROVED:

/s/ Jennifer Theresa Dewees 

ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF

/s/ Stephen Don Heninger 

ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANT

Case 3:06-cv-00733-MHT-TFM Document 34 Filed 11/19/2007 Page 2 of 2
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

)

In the Matter of the Extradition of )

MARIA del ROSARIO MORENO-VAZQUEZ ) 3:06-CV-761-MEF-CSC

a/k/a MARIA COONLEY )

)

 

United States’s Motion to Permit Filing

The United States respectfully moves this Court to permit the filing of its Exhibit

List, Witness List, and Deposition Designations (Doc. No. 22), which has being filed

approximately 30 minutes after its due date. 

Respectfully submitted this 22nd day of May, 2008,

LEURA G. CANARY

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

/s/ Christopher Snyder 

CHRISTOPHER A. SNYDER

Assistant United States Attorney

131 Clayton Street

Montgomery, AL 36104

Phone: (334) 223-7280

Fax: (334) 223-7135

E-mail: christopher.a.snyder@usdoj.gov

Certificate of Service

I hereby certify that on May 22, 2008, I electronically filed the foregoing with the

Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system, which will send notification of such filing

to the following: Ben Elton Bruner. 

/s/ Christopher Snyder

CHRISTOPHER A. SNYDER

Case 3:06-cv-00761-CSC Document 23 Filed 05/22/2008 Page 1 of 1
331.101-70 Salary rate limitation.       (a) Beginning in fiscal year 1990, Congress has stipulated in the Department of Health and Human Services appropriations acts and continuing resolutions that, under applicable contracts, appropriated funds cannot be used to pay the direct salary of an individual above the stipulated rates. The applicable rates for each year are identified at *www.opm.gov*.          (b) The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 352.231-70, Salary Rate Limitation, in solicitations and contracts when a cost-reimbursement; fixed-price level-of-effort; time-and-materials; or labor-hour contract is contemplated.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 331.1 - Applicability
# Subpart 1505.5 - Paid Advertisement [Reserved]

**Parent topic:**PART 1505 - PUBLICIZING CONTRACT ACTIONS
# Subpart 2024.1 - Protection of Individual Privacy

**Parent topic:**PART 2024 - PROTECTION OF PRIVACY AND FREEDOM OF INFORMATION

## 2024.103 Procedures.

The provisions at 10 CFR part 9, subpart B, Privacy Act Regulations, are applicable to the maintenance or disclosure of information for a system of records on individuals.
§ 1015.210 Liquidation of collateral. ( a ) DOE may liquidate security or collateral through the exercise of a power of sale in the security instrument or a nonjudicial foreclosure, and apply the proceeds to the applicable debt(s), if the debtor fails to pay the debt(s) within a reasonable time after demand and if such action is in the best interest of the United States. Collection from other sources, including liquidation of security or collateral, is not a prerequisite to requiring payment by a surety, insurer, or guarantor unless such action is expressly required by statute or contract.
( b ) When DOE learns that a bankruptcy petition has been filed with respect to a debtor, DOE will seek legal advice from counsel concerning the impact of the Bankruptcy Code, including, but not limited to, 11 U.S.C. 362, to determine the applicability of the automatic stay and the procedures for obtaining relief from such stay prior to proceeding under paragraph (a) of this section.
§ 966.34 Powers. The committee shall have the following powers: ( a ) To administer the provisions of this part in accordance with its terms;
( b ) To make rules and regulations to effectuate the terms and provisions of this part;
( c ) To receive, investigate, and report to the Secretary complaints of violation of the provisions of this part; and
( d ) To recommend to the Secretary amendments to this part.
3001.7001 Content.       The general format at (HSAR) 48 CFR 3001.704 shall be used to provide a justification to support the requested determination, waiver, exception or approval.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 3001.70—Other Determinations, Waivers, Exceptions, Approvals, Reviews, and Submittals
§ 959.27 Nomination. The Secretary may select the members of the committee and alternates from nominations which may be made in the following manner: ( a ) A meeting or meetings of producers and handlers shall be held for each district to nominate members and alternates for the committee. For nominations to the initial committee, the meetings may be sponsored by the United States Department of Agriculture or by any agency or group requested to do so by such department. For nominations for succeeding members and alternates on the committee, the committee shall hold such meetings or cause them to be held prior to June 15 of each year, after the effective date of this subpart, or by such other date as may be specified by the Secretary;
( b ) At each such meeting at least one nominee shall be designated for each position as member and for each position as alternate member on the committee;
( c ) Nominations for committee members and alternates shall be supplied to the Secretary in such manner and form as he may prescribe, not later than July 1 of each year, or by such other date as may be specified by the Secretary;
( d ) Only producers may participate in designating producer nominees, and only handlers may participate in naming handler nominees. In the event a person is engaged in producing or handling onions in more than one district, such person shall elect the district within which he may participate as aforesaid in designating nominees;
( e ) Regardless of the number of districts in which a person produces or handles onions, each such person is entitled to cast only one vote on behalf of himself, his agents, subsidiaries, affiliates, and representatives in designating nominees for committee members and alternates. An eligible voter's privilege of casting only one vote as aforesaid shall be construed to permit a voter to cast one vote for each position to be filled in the respective district in which he elects to vote.
[26 FR 12751, Dec. 30, 1961, as amended at 34 FR 6440, Apr. 12, 1969]
227 So.2d 598

#### STATE of Louisiana ex rel. Charles W. TIDWELL v. C. Murray HENDERSON, Warden Louisiana State Penitentiary, et al.

No. 50218.

Nov. 17, 1969.

In re: Charles W. Tidwell applying for writ of habeas corpus.

Application denied. The showing made is insufficient to entitle relator to the relief sought.
# SUBPART 5.1 – DISSEMINATION OF INFORMATION

*(Revised July 26, 2016 through PROCLTR 2016-08)*

**Parent topic:**PART 5 – PUBLICIZING CONTRACT ACTIONS

## 5.101 Methods of disseminating information.

(a) The synopsizing and public display requirements at FAR 5.101(a)(2) are satisfied when the solicitation is posted on DIBBS.