alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
PUBLIC LAW 109–411—DEC. 18, 2006 120 STAT. 2763

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—S. 1820 (H.R. 4054):

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 152 (2006):

Mar. 3, considered and passed Senate.

Dec. 6, considered and passed House.

Æ

Public Law 109–411

109th Congress

An Act

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 6110 East

51st Place in Tulsa, Oklahoma, as the ‘‘Dewey F. Bartlett Post Office’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DEWEY F. BARTLETT POST OFFICE.

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal

Service located at 6110 East 51st Place in Tulsa, Oklahoma, shall

be known and designated as the ‘‘Dewey F. Bartlett Post Office’’.

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation,

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference

to the ‘‘Dewey F. Bartlett Post Office’’.

Approved December 18, 2006.

Dec. 18, 2006

[S. 1820]
216.405-2 Cost-plus-award-fee contracts.       (1)  *Award-fee pool.*  The award-fee pool is the total available award fee for each evaluation period for the life of the contract.  The contracting officer shall perform an analysis of appropriate fee distribution to ensure at least 40 per cent of the award fee is available for the final evaluation so that the award fee is appropriately distributed over all evaluation periods to incentivize the contractor throughout performance of the contract.  The percentage of award fee available for the final evaluation may be set below 40 per cent if the contracting officer determines that a lower percentage is appropriate, and this determination is approved by the head of the contracting activity (HCA).  The HCA may not delegate this approval authority.          (2)  *Award-fee evaluation and payments.*  Award-fee payments other than payments resulting from the evaluation at the end of an award-fee period are prohibited. (This prohibition does not apply to base-fee payments.)  The fee-determining official’s rating for award-fee evaluations will be provided to the contractor within 45 calendar days of the end of the period being evaluated.  The final award-fee payment will be consistent with the fee-determining official’s final evaluation of the contractor’s overall performance against the cost, schedule, and performance outcomes specified in the award-fee plan.          (3)  *Limitations.*          (i)  The cost-plus-award-fee contract shall not be used—          (A)  To avoid—          *(1)*  Establishing cost-plus-fixed-fee contracts when the criteria for cost-plus-fixed-fee contracts apply; or          *(2)*  Developing objective targets so a cost-plus-incentive-fee contract can be used; or          (B)  For either engineering development or operational system development acquisitions that have specifications suitable for simultaneous research and development and production, except a cost-plus-award-fee contract may be used for individual engineering development or operational system development acquisitions ancillary to the development of a major weapon system or equipment, where—          *(1)*   It is more advantageous; and          *(2)*   The purpose of the acquisition is clearly to determine or solve specific problems associated with the major weapon system or equipment.          (ii)  Do not apply the weighted guidelines method to cost-plus-award-fee contracts for either the base (fixed) fee or the award fee.          (iii)  The base fee shall not exceed three percent of the estimated cost of the contract exclusive of the fee.          (4)  See PGI                 216.405-2              for guidance on the use of cost-plus-award-fee contracts.    **216.405-2-70 Award fee reduction or denial for jeopardizing the health or safety of Government personnel.****216.405-2-71 Award fee reduction or denial for failure to comply with requirements relating to performance of private security functions.****Parent topic:** 216.405 Cost-reimbursement incentive contracts.
# 46.000 Scope of Part.

The Military Departments provide Depot Level Repairable (DLR) quality requirements. The Military Departments report and track item deficiencies for DLR supplies. Any associated provisions and clauses shall follow the Military Departments procedures for DLR supplies.

**Parent topic:**PART 46 – QUALITY ASSURANCE
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

NORTHERN DIVISION 

HAROLD MOSS 

 Plaintiff(s), 

MONTGOMERY PRE-RELEASE 

CENTER, ET AL. 

 Defendant(s). 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

 

CASE NO. 2:06-CV-784-MEF-VPM 

 

MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

 COMES NOW the Defendants, Curtis Casey and Otis Smith, by and through the 

undersigned counsel, and hereby request an additional 30 (thirty) days in which to respond to 

Plaintiff’s complaint and for grounds state as follows: 

1. The Special Report and Answer for the Defendants are due October 16, 2006. 

2. The undersigned has encountered some delay in securing affidavits and other 

materials necessary to adequately respond to Plaintiff’s allegations. 

3. More time is needed by the Defendants to adequately prepare a response to 

Plaintiff’s Complaint. 

4. No party will be prejudiced by such and extension. 

 Respectfully submitted, 

 TROY KING 

 Attorney General 

 /s/ Benjamin H. Albritton 

 Benjamin H. Albritton 

 Assistant Attorney General 

Case 2:06-cv-00784-MEF-WC Document 8 Filed 10/16/2006 Page 1 of 2
ADDRESS OF COUNSEL: 

Office of the Attorney General 

11 South Union Street 

Montgomery, AL 36130 

(334) 242-7555 

(334) 242-2433 – fax 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that I have, this the 16th day of October, 2006, served a copy of the 

foregoing upon the Plaintiff by placing same in the United States Mail, postage prepaid and 

properly addressed as follows: 

Harold Moss, 170262 

Montgomery Pre-Release Center 

PO Box 75 

Mt. Meigs, AL 36057 

 /s/ Benjamin H. Albritton

 Benjamin H. Albritton 

Assistant Attorney General 

 

Case 2:06-cv-00784-MEF-WC Document 8 Filed 10/16/2006 Page 2 of 2
EX-33.7
(logo) WELLS FARGO

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Document Custody
1015 10th Avenue Southeast
Minneapolis, MN 55414


ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH THE APPLICABLE SERVICING CRITERIA


Management of the Document Custody Section of the Corporate Trust Services
division of Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (the "Company") is
responsible for assessing compliance with the servicing criteria set forth in
Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB of the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Management has determined that the servicing criteria are applicable in regard
to the servicing platform for the period as follows:

Platform:
Publicly-issued (i.e., transaction-level reporting required under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) residential mortgage-backed
securities and commercial mortgage-backed securities issued on or after January
1, 2006 for which the Company provides document custody services, excluding any
such securities issued by any agency or instrumentality of the U.S. government
(other than the Federal Deposit Insurance Company) or any government sponsored
entity (the "Platform").


Period:  As of and for the twelve months ended December 31, 2012 (the "Period").

Applicable Servicing Criteria:

The servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d)(1)(iv), 1122(d)(4)(i) and
1122(d)(4)(ii), in regard to the activities performed by the Company with
respect to the Platform (the "Applicable Servicing Criteria"). Management of
the Company has determined that all other servicing criteria set forth in Item
1122(d) are not applicable to the Platform.


With respect to the Platform and the Period, the Company's management provides
the following assertion of compliance with respect to the Applicable Servicing
Criteria:

1. The Company's management is responsible for assessing the Company compliance
with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.

2. The Company management has assessed the Company compliance with the
Applicable Servicing Criteria. In performing this assessment, management used
the criteria set forth by the Securities and Exchange Commission in paragraph
(d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB.

3. Based on such assessment as of and for the Period, the Company has complied,
in all material respects with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.

KPMG LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an
attestation report with respect to management's assertion of compliance with the
Applicable Servicing Criteria as of and for the Period.


WELLS FARGO BANK, National Association

By:    /s/ Shari Gillund
       Shari L. Gillund

Title: Senior Vice President

Dated: February 15, 2013


Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

 v. ) CR. NO. 3:06CR204-MEF

)

 )

HENRY ERIK YAPIAS

O R D E R

The defendant by consent has appeared before a United States Magistrate Judge and has

entered a plea of guilty. The Magistrate Judge accepted the plea of guilty and has adjudicated the

defendant guilty. Accordingly, it is ORDERED as follows:

1. Sentencing of the defendant is hereby set on September 13, 2007, at 9:00 a.m.,

Courtroom 2A , the Frank M. Johnson, Jr. United States Courthouse Complex, One Church Street,

Montgomery, Alabama.

2. In accordance with Rule 32(f)(1), Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, counsel for the

defendant and the Government shall communicate in writing to the probation officer, and to each

other, any objections they have as to any material information, sentencing classifications, sentencing

guideline ranges, and policy statements contained in or omitted from the presentence report. The

probation officer will notify parties of the objection deadline and will schedule a conference to

discuss and resolve, if possible, any factual and legal issues contained in the presentence report.

3. Any motion for downward departure shall be filed on or before the conference date with

the probation officer, unless based on unknown and unforeseen circumstances arising after that date,

in which case the motion must be filed promptly upon discovery of such circumstances.

Nothing contained in this Order shall be construed as impairing the rights of any party as

established in the Constitution or laws of the United States.

DONE this the 20th day of June, 2007.

 /s/ Mark E. Fuller 

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cr-00204-MEF-CSC Document 43 Filed 06/20/2007 Page 1 of 1
§ 1049.3 Definitions. ( a ) *Act* means sections 661 of the Department of Energy Organization Act, as amended, (42 U.S.C. 7270a).
( b ) *Arrest* means an act resulting in the restriction of a person's movement, other than a brief consensual detention for purposes of questioning about a person's identity and requesting identification, accomplished by means of force or show of authority under circumstances that would lead a reasonable person to believe that he was not free to leave the presence of the officer.
( c ) *Contractor* means a contractor or subcontractor at any tier.
( d ) *Deadly force* means that force which a reasonable person would consider likely to cause death or serious bodily harm.
( e ) *Protective Force Officer* means a person designated by DOE to carry firearms pursuant to section 661 of the Act.
( f ) *SPR* means the Strategic Petroleum Reserve, its storage or related facilities, and real property subject to the jurisdiction or administration, or in the custody of the Department of Energy under part B of title I of the Energy Policy and Conservation Act (42 U.S.C. 6231-6247).
( g ) *Suspect* means a person who is subject to arrest by a Protective Force Officer as provided in these guidelines.
```

[109th Congress Public Law 331]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ331.109]

[[Page 120 STAT. 1771]]

Public Law 109-331
109th Congress

                                 An Act

 
     To designate the United States courthouse to be constructed in 
  Greenville, South Carolina, as the ``Carroll A. Campbell, Jr. United 
      States Courthouse''. <<NOTE: Oct. 12, 2006 -  [H.R. 5546]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

    The United States courthouse to be constructed in Greenville, South 
Carolina, building number SC0017ZZ, shall be known and designated as the 
``Carroll A. Campbell, Jr. United States Courthouse''.
SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the United States courthouse referred to 
in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Carroll A. 
Campbell, Jr. United States Courthouse''.

    Approved October 12, 2006.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--H.R. 5546:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 152 (2006):
            Sept. 27, considered and passed House.
            Sept. 29, considered and passed Senate.

                                  <all>
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                          5
<MULTIPLIER>                       1,000

<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           1,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                23,000
<PP&E>                                       3,400,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,487,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,936,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,815,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<COMMON>                                       696,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                  (2,879,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,936,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  213,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              85,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (213,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (213,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (213,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.00)



</TABLE>
#### BANK OF THE UNITED STATES v. PUBLIC BANK OF NEW YORK CITY.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

February 11, 1915.)

Action by the Bank of the United States against the Public Bank of New York City.

No opinion. Application granted. Order signed. See, also, 151 N. Y. Supp. 26.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION

RICARDO WRIGHT, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

v. ) 2:06cv785-MHT

) 

U.S. FOODSERVICE, INC., )

and U.S. FOODSERVICE, INC.- )

Montgomery Division, )

)

Defendants. )

ORDER

Counsel for defendants having orally informed the

court that defendants do not object, it is ORDERED as

follows:

(1) Plaintiff Ricardo Wright’s motion for retraction

(Doc. No. 64) is granted.

(2) Plaintiff Wright’s document (Doc. No. 63) is

retracted.

DONE, this the 6th day of February, 2008.

 /s/ Myron H. Thompson 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00785-MHT-WC Document 69 Filed 02/06/2008 Page 1 of 1
**EXHIBIT
10.2**
 
 **FIRST
AMENDMENT**
 **TO
THE**
 **GREENE
COUNTY BANCSHARES, INC.**
 **NON-COMPETITION
AGREEMENT**
 **DATED
NOVEMBER 24, 2003**
 **FOR**
 **R.
STAN PUCKETT**
 
 
 THIS
AMENDMENT is adopted this 15 th day of
April, 2005, by and between GREENE COUNTY BANCSHARES, INC., a Tennessee
corporation located in Greeneville, TN (the “Company”) and R. STAN PUCKETT (the
“Executive”).
  The
Company and the Executive executed the Non-Competition Agreement on November 24,
2003 (the “Agreement”).
 
 The
undersigned hereby amends, in part, said Agreement for the purpose of changing
the timing of the death benefits payable under the Agreement. Therefore, the
following changes shall be made:
 
 *Section
8 of the Agreement shall be deleted in its entirety and replaced by Section 8
below* *.*
 
 
 8 .  **Deferred
Compensation Benefits** :  In
consideration of the covenants contained herein, Company agrees to provide
deferred compensation benefits to Employee, in addition to all other such
benefits provided to Employee by Company, in the amount set forth in Schedule A
under the column Annual Benefit Upon Termination for the age specified in said
schedule (the “Benefit Amount”), upon the termination of his employment. The
Benefit Amount shall be paid for seven (7) consecutive years.
 
 If
Employee dies prior to the commencement of payment of the Benefit Amount, the
Company agrees to provide benefits in the amount set forth in Schedule A under
the column Pre-retirement Annual Death Benefit (the “Death Benefit Amount”)for
the age specified in said schedule upon his death. The Death Benefit Amount
shall be paid for seven (7) consecutive years commencing within ninety (90) days
of the receipt of a death certificate. If Employee dies after he has commenced
drawing the Benefit Amount, then said benefits shall continue to be paid for the
balance of the seven (7) year period to his named beneficiary.
 
 If
Employee is still employed by Company on his sixtieth (60th) birthday, then
Company shall commence paying the Benefit Amount on his sixtieth (60th)
birthday. Provided, however, if Employee’s employment is Terminated for Cause as
defined in Section 1, then Company shall be released from its duty to pay the
benefits contemplated in this section.
 
 
 **IN
WITNESS OF THE ABOVE** , the
Executive and the Company hereby consent to this First Amendment.
  Executive:
    
    
    GREENE COUNTY
      BANCSHARES/s/ R. Stan
      Puckett
    
    
    **By:**/s/William
      F. Richmond**R. STAN PUCKETT****Title**Chief
      Financial Officer
 
  
 1
|   | 1. | Patriot shall permit Banyan full or partial use of furnished office space in the Suite sufficient for Banyan’s President, Vice President, Administration,  CFO, Controller and one staff person together with usual and customary office services including but not limited to secretarial services, receptionist services, telephone answering services, internet service,  coffee service, and copy service.  In addition Patriot will supply Human Resources and IT services to Banyan personnel. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The monthly fee for such office use and services is Six Thousand Dollars ($6,000) per month payable in advance not later than the fifth day of each month. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 3. | Either party shall have the right to terminate the Agreement for any reason upon thirty (30) days prior written notice to the other party. |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 4. | Banyan agrees to follow the rules and regulations of the building and any additional reasonable rules set forth during the term of the Agreement. |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 5. | Any notices shall be given as follows: |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------|

----

|   | 6. | This Agreement shall not be amended or modified except in writing and agreed to by both parties. |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Patriot Rail Corp.     |               | Banyan Rail Services, Inc.   |
|------------------------|--------------------|------------------------------|
|                   |               |                         |
| By                     | /s/ Gary O. Marino |                         | By | /s/ Jon Ryan |
| Gary O. Marino         |               | Jon Ryan                     |
| Its: President and CEO |               | Its: Chief Financial Officer |

----
Case 1:06-cr-00170-WHA-CSC Document 358 Filed 03/02/2007 Page 1 of 1
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION

DONNA DORSEY DAVIS, etc., )

)

Plaintiff, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

v. ) 2:06cv766-MHT

) 

RICHARD M. DORSEY, etc., )

and CD&O, L.L.C., etc., )

)

Defendants. )

ORDER

It is ORDERED that the motion to reconsider (Doc. No.

27) is denied.

DONE, this the 9th day of April, 2007.

 /s/ Myron H. Thompson 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00766-MHT-TFM Document 30 Filed 04/09/2007 Page 1 of 1