alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 100
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 100 appear at 81 FR 86910, Dec. 2, 2016.

§ 100.8 Information collection requirements: OMB approval. ( a ) The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has submitted the information collection requirements contained in this part to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for approval as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 *et seq.*). The NRC may not conductor sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. OMB has approved the information collection requirements contained in this part under control number 3150-0093.
( b ) The approved information collection requirements contained in this part appear in §§ 100.21, 100.23 and appendix A to this part.
[61 FR 65176, Dec. 11, 1996, as amended at 62 FR 52190, Oct. 6, 1997; 67 FR 67101, Nov. 4, 2002]
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

DEBRA BEYAH, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO.: 1:06-CV-659

)

WAL-MART STORES, INC )

)

Defendant. )

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE

COMES NOW, Bobbie S. Crook, and hereby enters her appearance as counsel for the 

Plaintiff, Debra Beyah.

Respectfully submitted on this the 2nd day of August, 2006.

 /s/ Bobbie S. Crook 

BOBBIE S. CROOK (CRO-040)

Attorney for Plaintiff

367 South St. Andrews Street

Dothan, AL 36301

(334) 671-8062

(334) 677-2872

Email: bcrook100@aol.com

OF COUNSEL:

ANN C. ROBERTSON

TEMPLE D. TRUEBLOOD

Wiggins, Childs, Quinn and Pantazis

The Kress Building 

301 19th Avenue North

Birmingham, AL 35203

(205) 328-0640

Case 1:06-cv-00659-CSC Document 3 Filed 08/02/2006 Page 1 of 1
§ 1013.21 Discovery. ( a ) The following types of discovery are authorized: ( 1 ) Requests for production of documents for inspection and copying;
( 2 ) Requests for admissions of the authenticity of any relevant document or of the truth of any relevant fact;
( 3 ) Written interrogatories; and
( 4 ) Depositions.
( b ) For the purpose of this section and §§ 1013.22 and 1013.23 of this part, the term “documents” includes information, documents, reports, answers, records, accounts, papers, and other data and documentary evidence. Nothing contained herein shall be interpreted to require the creation of a document.
( c ) Unless mutually agreed to by the parties, discovery is available only as ordered by the ALJ. The ALJ shall regulate the timing of discovery.
( d ) *Motions for discovery.* ( 1 ) A party seeking discovery may file a motion with the ALJ. Such a motion shall be accompanied by a copy of the requested discovery, or in the case of depositions, a summary of the scope of the proposed deposition.
( 2 ) Within ten days of service, a party may file an opposition to the motion and/or a motion for protective order as provided in § 1013.24 of this part.
( 3 ) The ALJ may grant a motion for discovery only if he or she finds that the discovery sought— ( i ) Is necessary for the expeditious, fair, and reasonable consideration of the issues;
( ii ) Is not unduly costly or burdensome;
( iii ) Will not unduly delay the proceeding; and
( iv ) Does not seek privileged information.
( 4 ) The burden of showing that discovery should be allowed is on the party seeking discovery.
( 5 ) The ALJ may grant discovery subject to a protective order under § 1013.24 of this part.
( e ) *Depositions.* ( 1 ) If a motion for deposition is granted, the ALJ shall issue a subpoena for the deponent, which may require the deponent to produce documents. The subpoena shall specify the time, date, and place at which the deposition will be held.
( 2 ) The party seeking to depose shall serve the subpoena in the manner prescribed in § 1013.8 of this part.
( 3 ) The deponent may file with the ALJ a motion to quash the subpoena or a motion for a protective order within ten days of service.
( 4 ) The party seeking to depose shall provide for the taking of a verbatim transcript of the deposition, which it shall make available to all other parties for inspection and copying.
( f ) Each party shall bear its own costs of discovery.
2822.1503 Procedures for acquiring end

products on the List of Products Requiring

Contractor Certification as to Forced or

Indentured Child Labor.

The contracting officer shall refer to the DOJ Inspector General for investigation, under FAR

22.1503(e), any matters relating to that section.

Parent topic: Subpart 2822.15 - Prohibition of Acquisition of Products Produced by Forced or

Indentured Child Labor
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION

DELOISE PRICE, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

v. ) 2:06cv721-MHT

) 

WAL-MART STORES, INC., and )

EXTREME PERFORMANCE, INC., )

)

Defendants. )

ORDER

It is ORDERED that the motion to dismiss (Doc. No.

24) is denied without prejudice.

DONE, this the 19th day of October, 2007.

 /s/ Myron H. Thompson 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00721-MHT-TFM Document 34 Filed 10/19/2007 Page 1 of 1
`[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 163 Reported in House (RH)]






                                                  House Calendar No. 14
109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 163

                          [Report No. 109-21]

   Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to 
 consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committeee on 
                                 Rules.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 16, 2005

   Mr. Gingrey, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 
resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 
                                printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION


 
   Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to 
 consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committeee on 
                                 Rules.

    Resolved,  That the requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII for a 
two-thirds vote to consider a report from the Committee on Rules on the 
same day it is presented to the House is waived with respect to any 
resolution reported on the legislative day of March 17, 2005, providing 
for consideration of a bill relating to the rights of an incapacitated 
person or persons.




                                                  House Calendar No. 14

109th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                              H. RES. 163

                          [Report No. 109-21]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

   Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to 
 consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committeee on 
                                 Rules.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             March 16, 2005

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed`
O rder filed May 1 , 201 4



### In The 

# Eleventh Court of Appeals

__________

No. 11

- 1 3

- 00 214

- CR

__________

BRITTANY REDDEN , Appellant

V.

THE S TATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the County Criminal Court No. 6

Ta rrant County, Texas

Tri al Court Cause No. 1 204249

O R D E R

T his appeal ha s be come unduly stalled due to the failure of A ppellant’s

retain ed counsel, Wm. Reagan Wynn

, to file an appellate brief

. T he brief was

originally due on October 14 , 201 3

. This court has granted four motion s for

extension of time to file Appellant’s brief

, and counsel has now filed a fifth motion

for extension despite this court’s letter dated April 3, 2014

, in which this court2 directed counsel to file an appellat e brief on or before April 1 1, 2014 , “with no

further extensions

. ” As of this date, w e have not received Appellant’s brief.

C ounsel has ignored this court’s directive

.
By this order, Wm. Reagan Wynn i s ORDERED to file in this court a brief

on behalf of A ppellant on or before 3:00 p.m. on Tuesday

, May 6 , 2014

. At that

time, Appellant’s brief shall have already been e

- filed or be present in the portal

for the Eleventh Court of Appeals through eFileTexas.gov

. If A ppe llant’s brief has

not been e

- filed by 3:00 p.m. on Tuesday

, May 6 , 2014

, Wm. Reagan Wynn is

ORDERED to appear in person at that time in the courtroom of the Eleventh Court

of A ppeals at 100 West Main Street in Eastland, Texas

, to explain the inordinate

delay in the preparation of Appellant’s brief.

PER CURIAM

May 1, 201 4

Do not publish. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 47.2(b).

Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

Willson , J. , and Bailey, J.
Order entered February 2 3 , 202 1

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05
- 20
- 00421
- CR
ANTONIO ALEX ANGULOV ILLALTA, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from t he 203rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F 19
- 00739
- P

O RDER
We REINSTATE this appeal. We abated the appeal by order dated January 12, 2021 because a ppellant ’ s brie f was past due and we had no t received a motio n to exte nd time or other communication regarding the brief. On February 12, 202 1, counsel tendered a brief and filed a motion to extend time to file the brief

.W e VACATE our January 12, 2021 order to the extent it required a hearing

and finding s and recommendation s . We GRANT appellant ’ s motion and ORDER
the brief received with the motion filed as of the date of this order.
We DI RECT the Clerk to send copies of this order to t h e Hon orable Rachel Jones, Presiding Judge, 203rd Judici al District Court ; to J. Daniel Ol iphant, Jr. ; and to the Dallas County Di strict Attorney’s Office , Appellate Division

.

/ s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JU STICE
February 26, 2015

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

LORENZO DWAYNE JONES, Appellant

NO. 14-13-01122-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

________________________________

This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. 

Having considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the 

judgment. The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
Subpart 911.6 - Priorities and Allocations    **Parent topic:** PART 911 - DESCRIBING AGENCY NEEDS911.600 Scope of subpart.       This subpart implements and supplements 48 CFR part subpart 11.6, Priorities and Allocations, and implements the regulations and procedures of the Defense Priorities and Allocations System (DPAS) in solicitations and contracts in support of authorized national defense programs. (See 15 CFR part 700).911.602 General.       (e) The Heads of Contracting Activities shall ensure that members of their staffs and contractors under their jurisdiction are advised of the provisions of the DPAS regulation and that the related procedures are followed to ensure adherence to the regulation throughout the industrial supply chain. Under DPAS, it is mandatory that the priority rating be extended through the industrial chain from supplier to supplier.911.604 Solicitation provision and contract clause.       (a) The contracting officer shall insert the provision at 952.211-70, Priorities and Allocations (Atomic Energy), in solicitations that will result in the placement of rated orders for authorized DOE atomic energy programs.          (b) The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 952.211-71, Priorities and Allocations (Atomic Energy), in contracts that are placed in support of authorized DOE atomic energy programs.          (c) The use of the provisions at 952.211-70 and the clause at 952.211-71 is optional for industrial delivery orders of $5,000 or less.
#### § 205.307 Form and style; number of copies

An original and two conformed copies of an application containing the information required under §§ 205.300 through 205.309 must be filed.
2834.005-6 Full production.

The CAO is the agency head for the purposes of FAR 34.005-6.

Parent topic: Subpart 2834.0 - General
# Subpart 1036.6 - Architect-Engineer Services

**Parent topic:**PART 1036 - CONSTRUCTION AND ARCHITECT-ENGINEER CONTRACTS

## 1036.602-5 Short selection process for contracts not to exceed the simplified acquisition threshold.

Bureaus are authorized to use either process.
```

[109th Congress Public Law 380]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]

[DOCID: f:publ380.109]
  

[[Page 120 STAT. 2671]]

Public Law 109-380
109th Congress

                                 An Act

 
To convey to the town of Frannie, Wyoming, certain land withdrawn by the 
   Commis- sioner of Reclamation. <<NOTE: Dec. 1, 2006 -  [S. 101]>> 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CONVEYANCE OF LAND TO THE TOWN OF FRANNIE, WYOMING.

    (a) Conveyance.--Subject to valid existing rights, the Secretary of 
the Interior shall convey by quitclaim deed, without consideration, all 
right, title, and interest of the United States in and to the parcel of 
land described in subsection (b) to the town of Frannie, Wyoming.
    (b) Description of Land.--The parcel of land referred to in 
subsection (a) is the parcel of land withdrawn by the Commissioner of 
Reclamation--
            (1) consisting of approximately 37,500 square feet;
            (2) located in the town of Frannie, Wyoming; and
            (3) more particularly described in the approved Plat of 
        Survey of Frannie Townsite, Wyoming, as the North \1/2\ of Block 
        26, T. 58 N, R. 97 W.

    (c) Reservation of Mineral Rights.--The conveyance under subsection 
(a) shall be subject to the reservation by the United States of any oil 
and gas rights.
    (d) Revocations.--
            (1) Special use permit.--The special use permit issued by 
        the Commissioner of Reclamation, numbered O-LM-60-L1413, and 
        dated April 20, 1990, is revoked with respect to the land 
        described in subsection (b).
            (2) Secretarial orders.--The following Secretarial Orders 
        issued by the Commissioner of Reclamation are revoked with 
        respect to the land described in subsection (b):
                    (A) The Secretarial Order for the withdrawal of land 
                for the Shoshone Reclamation Project dated October 21, 
                1913, as amended.
                    (B) The Secretarial Order for the withdrawal of land 
                for the Frannie Townsite Reservation dated April 19, 
                1920.

    Approved December 1, 2006.

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY--S. 101:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

SENATE REPORTS: No. 109-46 (Comm. on Energy and Natural Resources).
CONGRESSIONAL RECORD:
                                                        Vol. 151 (2005):
                                    July 26, considered and passed 
                                        Senate.
                                                        Vol. 152 (2006):
                                    Nov. 15, considered and passed 
                                        House.

                                  <all>
```
<PAGE>   1



PART II, ITEM 6, EXHIBIT II.

                               EGAN SYSTEMS, INC.
                        COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS

Computation of per share earnings:

The following data show the amounts used in computing earnings per share and the
effect on income (loss) and the weighted average number of shares of dilutive
potential common stock.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                               Nine Months Ended
                                                                 September 30,
                                                                 ---------------
                                                             1999               1998
                                                             ----               ----
<S>                                                     <C>                <C>
Income (loss) available to common stockholders
 used in primary EPS                                    $    139,348       $    (93,401)

Interest expense on convertible note payable                       -                625
                                                        ------------       ------------

Income (loss) available to common stockholders
 after assumed conversions of dilutive securities       $    139,348       $    (92,776)
                                                        ============       ============

Weighted average number of common shares in
 primary EPS                                              18,646,652         18,541,652

Effect of dilutive securities                              4,682,642          2,866,452
                                                        ------------       ------------

Weighted average number of common shares and
 dilutive potential common stock used in
 fully diluted EPS                                        23,329,294         21,408,104
                                                        ============       ============

Net income (loss) per common share:

 Basic                                                  $       0.01       $      (0.01)
                                                        ============       ============

 Fully diluted                                          $       0.01         $        -
                                                        ============       ============
</TABLE>





For 1998, the effect of dilutive securities were not included in computing fully
diluted EPS because their effects are anti-dilutive.



                                      10
COURTROOM DEPUTY’S MINUTES DATE: October 25, 2006

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA DIGITAL RECORDING: 10:51 - 11:00

/ARRAIGNMENT CHANGE OF PLEA  CONSENT PLEA

 RULE 44(c) HEARING  SENTENCING

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

PRESIDING MAG. JUDGE: Susan Russ Walker DEPUTY CLERK: Joyce Taylor

CASE NUMBER: 3:06cr210-MEF-CSC DEFENDANT NAME: Melissa Ward

AUSA: Christopher Snyder DEFENDANT ATTORNEY: Chip Vercelli

Type counsel ( )Waived; ( )Retained; ( / )CJA; ( )FPD

( ) appointed at arraignment; ( ) standing in for: _______________

PTSO/USPO:

Interpreter present? ( / )NO; ( )YES Name:

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/This is defendant’s FIRST APPEARANCE.

/Financial Affidavit executed. ORAL MOTION for appointment of Counsel.

/ORAL ORDER appointing Panel Attorney Chip Vercelli. Notice of Appearance to be filed.

 WAIVER OF INDICTMENT executed and filed.

 INFORMATION filed.

 Juvenile Information filed w/Certificate that State Court refused jurisdiction.

PLEA: /Not Guilty

 Guilty as to:

 Count(s):

 Count(s):  dismissed on oral motion of USA

 to be dismissed at sentencing

 Written plea agreement filed  ORDERED SEALED

 ORAL ORDER Accepting Guilty Plea and Adjudicating Defendant Guilty as to Counts

/CRIMINAL TERM: 11/27/06  WAIVER OF SPEEDY TRIAL filed. 

 DISCOVERY DISCLOSURE DATE: 10/25/06

 ORDER: Defendant continued under  same bond;  summons; for:

 Trial on ____________;  Sentencing on ____________

/ Defendant remanded to custody of U. S. Marshal for:

 Trial on ________________; or  Sentencing on ______________

 Rule 44 Hearing:  Waiver of Conflict of Interest Form executed

 Defendant requests time to secure new counsel

Case 3:06-cr-00210-MEF-CSC Document 8 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

ELIZABETH LYNN HUTCHINSON, )

 )

Plaintiff, )

 )

vs. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:06cv700-WHA

 )

PHENIX CITY BOARD OF EDUCATION, )

et al., )

 )

Defendants. )

ORDER

Upon consideration of the Motion to Withdraw (Doc. #20), filed by Benjamin J.

DeGweck on March 2, 2007, and for good cause shown, it is hereby

ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED, and Mr. DeGweck is allowed to withdraw as

attorney of record for the Plaintiff. The Plaintiff will continue to be represented by Rocco

Calamusa, Jr.

DONE this 5th day of March, 2007.

/s/ W. Harold Albritton 

W. HAROLD ALBRITTON

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-00700-WHA-WC Document 21 Filed 03/05/2007 Page 1 of 1
Case 3:06-cr-00204-MEF-CSC Document 1 Filed 08/15/2006 Page 1 of 2
Case 3:06-cr-00204-MEF-CSC Document 1 Filed 08/15/2006 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
of First Community Financial Corporation, (the Company) for the period ended September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Jody D. Graybill, President of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. To my knowledge, the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of the operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.



|                        |  |  |  |     |  |                              
|----------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | -----------------------------
|Date: November 13, 2007 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Jody D. Graybill         
|                        |  |  |  |     |  | Jody D. Graybill             
|                        |  |  |  |     |  | President                    
|                        |  |  |  |     |  | (Principal Executive Officer)
Subpart 2913.1 - Procedures

Parent topic: PART 2913 - SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION PROCEDURES

2913.106-3 Soliciting competition, evaluation of quotations

or offers, award and documentation.

In accordance with FAR 13.106-3(b), simplified acquisition files must contain documentation of the

factors considered in making an award in excess of the micro-purchase threshold. When other than

the lowest responsive quotation from a responsible supplier is used as the basis for a purchase, the

contracting officer must identify the basis (i.e., best value) of the award and include in the purchase

file documentation of the reasons for rejecting any lower quotation and the name of the individual

responsible for making the determination to award to other than the lowest priced quotation. The

contracting officer has broad discretion in determining the award of a purchase order, which may be

based on the factors listed in FAR 13.106-3. This requirement does not necessitate a separate

determination if the procurement file contains preprinted standardized classifications for award.
# Subpart 3004.1—Contract Execution

**Parent topic:**PART 3004—ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS

## 3004.103 Contract clause.

Insert the clause at (FAR) 48 CFR 52.204–1, Approval of Contract, in each solicitation where approval to award the resulting contract is required above the contracting officer level.