alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
H. Res. 298

In the House of Representatives, U.S., 

May 26, 2005.

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule 

XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the 

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of 

the bill (H.R. 2528) making appropriations for military quality of life functions of the Department of Defense, military 

construction, the Department of Veterans Affairs, and related 

agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2006, and 

for other purposes. The first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. All points of order against consideration of the 

bill are waived. General debate shall be confined to the bill 

and shall not exceed one hour equally divided and controlled 

by the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on Appropriations. After general debate the bill shall 

be considered for amendment under the five-minute rule. 

Points of order against provisions in the bill for failure to 

comply with clause 2 of rule XXI are waived. During consideration of the bill for amendment, the Chairman of the Com-
2

•HRES 298 EH 

mittee of the Whole may accord priority in recognition on the 

basis of whether the Member offering an amendment has 

caused it to be printed in the portion of the Congressional 

Record designated for that purpose in clause 8 of rule XVIII. 

Amendments so printed shall be considered as read. When 

the committee rises and reports the bill back to the House 

with a recommendation that the bill do pass, the previous 

question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and 

amendments thereto to final passage without intervening motion except one motion to recommit with or without instructions. 

Attest:

Clerk.
Exhibit 34.2

LOGO

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors

TransCentra, Inc.

We have examined managements assertion for those customers that management has informed us have requested confirmation of compliance,
included in the accompanying Managements Report on Assessment of Compliance with Regulation AB Servicing Criteria (Managements Assertion), that TransCentra, Inc. (the Company) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in
Item 1122(d)(2)(i) and Item 1122 (d)(4)(iv) of the Securities and Exchange Commissions (SEC) Regulation AB for services by the Company that are encompassed by contractual obligations to perform Regulation AB reporting (the
Platform) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2015. TransCentra has determined that the remainder of the servicing criteria are not applicable to the activities it performs with respect to the Platform covered by this report.
Management is responsible for the Companys compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on managements assertion about the Companys compliance with the applicable servicing criteria
based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards established by the American Institute of
Certified Public Accountants, as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Companys compliance with the applicable servicing criteria,
including tests on a sample basis of the servicing activities related to the Platform, determining whether the Company performed those activities in compliance with the servicing criteria during the specified period and performing such other
procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our procedures were limited to selected servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report and, accordingly, such samples may not have included servicing
activities related to each asset-backed transaction in the Platform. Further, an examination is not designed to detect noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurred prior to the period specified above that may have affected the balances
or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Companys
compliance with the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, managements assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned
applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2015, is fairly stated, in all material respects.

/s/ Porter
Keadle Moore, LLC

February 1, 2016

235 Peachtree Street NE | Suite 1800 | Atlanta, Georgia 30303 | Phone 404.588.4200 | Fax 404.588.4222

A member of Allinial Global
#### § 20.2007 Compliance with environmental and health protection regulations.

Nothing in this subpart relieves the licensee from complying with other applicable Federal, State, and local regulations governing any other toxic or hazardous properties of materials that may be disposed of under this subpart.
Case 1:06-cv-00775-TFM Document 22 Filed 10/27/2006 Page 1 of 1
Sixth Amendment to the Cardinal Health 401K Savings Plan



 Exhibit 4.11 
 SIXTH AMENDMENT 
 TO THE 
 CARDINAL HEALTH 401(K) SAVINGS PLAN 
 (As amended and restated effective January 1, 2006) 
 Background
Information 
 A. Cardinal Health, Inc. (“Cardinal Health”) previously adopted and currently maintains the Cardinal Health
401(k) Savings Plan (the “Plan”), for the benefit of employees of Cardinal Health and its subsidiaries and affiliates. 
 B.
Section 12.02 of the Plan permits the amendment of the Plan at any time. 
 C. The Cardinal Health, Inc. Benefits Policy Committee (the
“Committee”), with the concurrence of the Human Resources and Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors, authorized the amendment of the Plan to reduce the discretionary employer contribution under the Plan from 3% of
“Compensation” (as defined in the Plan) to 2% of Compensation, effective as of April 17, 2009. 
 D. The Committee also desires
to amend the Plan to provide for the accrual of the Employer Contribution and Special Contribution on the basis of the Employer’s payroll period applicable to the Participant, rather than on a Plan Year basis, in order to implement this
mid-year reduction in the rate of accrual. 
 Amendment of the Cardinal Health 401(k) Savings Plan 
 The Plan is hereby amended as set forth below, effective as of January 1, 2009: 
 1. Section 3.03.B. of the Plan is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows: 
 Accrual of Benefit. The Administrative Committee shall determine the accrual of a Participant’s benefit on the basis of an
“Allocation Period”. For purposes of this Section, an “Allocation Period” shall be defined as the Employer’s payroll period applicable to the Participant. In allocating an Employer Contribution to a Participant’s
Account, the Administrative Committee, subject to Section 10.01, shall take into account only Compensation paid to the Employee during the portion of the Allocation Period during which the Employee was a Participant. Notwithstanding any other
provision to the contrary, an Employer or Special Contribution shall not be allocated to a Participant’s Account to the extent the contribution would exceed the Participant’s “Maximum Permissible Amount” as described in Schedule
IV. 
 2. All other provisions of the Plan shall remain in full force and effect. 
  

			
	CARDINAL HEALTH, INC.
		
	By:	 	         /s/ Monica Foster

		
	Its:	 	         VP Benefits

		
	Date:	 	            April 17, 2009
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 20 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 20

   Expressing the disapproval of the House of Representatives of the 
 Social Security totalization agreement between the United States and 
                                Mexico.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 4, 2005

Mr. Hayworth submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                    the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Expressing the disapproval of the House of Representatives of the 
 Social Security totalization agreement between the United States and 
                                Mexico.

    Resolved,  That, pursuant to section 233(e)(2) of the Social 
Security Act, the House of Representatives hereby disapproves the 
agreement establishing totalization arrangements between the social 
security system established by title II of such Act and the social 
security system of Mexico, signed by the Commissioner of Social 
Security and the Director General, Mexican Social Security Institute, 
on June 29, 2004.
                                 <all>
```
NASA LogoNTRSNTRS - NASA Technical Reports ServerSearchmore_vertCollectionsAboutNewsHelpLogin Back to ResultsBOREAS TE-5 Soil Respiration DataThe BOREAS TE-5 team collected measurements in the NSA and SSA on gas exchange, gas composition, and tree growth. Soil respiration data were collected from 26-May-94 to 07-Sep-94 in the BOREAS NSA and SSA to compare the soil respiration rates in different forest sites using a LI-COR 6200 soil respiration chamber (model 6299). The data are stored in tabular ASCII files. The data files are available on a CD-ROM (see document number 20010000884), or from the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) Distrobuted Activity Archive Center (DAAC).Document ID20010005745Acquisition SourceGoddard Space Flight CenterDocument TypeTechnical Memorandum (TM)AuthorsHall, Forrest G.*(NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Greenbelt, MD United States)*Curd, Shelaine*(Raytheon Information Technology and Scientific Services Greenbelt, MD United States)*Ehleriinger, Jim*(Utah Univ. Salt Lake City, UT United States)*Brooks, J. Renee*(University of South Florida Tampa, FL United States)*Flanagan, Larry*(Lethbridge Univ. Lethbridge, Alberta Canada)*Date AcquiredSeptember 7, 2013Publication DateOctober 1, 2000Subject CategoryEarth Resources And Remote SensingReport/Patent NumberNAS 1.15:209891/VOL139Rept-2000-03136-0/VOL139NASA/TM-2000-209891/VOL139Funding Number(s)PROJECT: RTOP 462-33-01Distribution LimitsPublicCopyrightWork of the US Gov. Public Use Permitted.Available DownloadsNameType20010005745.pdfSTIcloud_downloadcontent_copyvisibilityRelated RecordsThere are no records associated with this record.visibility_offNo Preview Available
 No Fear Act | Freedom of Information Act | Office of the Inspector General | Agency Financial ReportsNASA Web Privacy Policy and Important Notices | NASA Guidelines for Quality of InformationDisclaimers, Copyright, Terms of Use | Accessibility | NASA OCIO | USA.gov | NASA.govContact Us | Site MapSTI LogoNASA Official: JoAnne R. Calhoun Site Curator: STI Compliance and Distribution Services Last Modified: September 12, 2024
# 6.503 Annual reporting requirements.

(b)(2) Procuring organization competition advocates shall submit their annual competition report to the DLA Acquisition Operations Division by 15 November each year.

**Parent topic:**SUBPART 6.5 –ADVOCATES FOR COMPETITION
-86 -84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72 -70

 32

 34

 36

 38

 40

 42

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 1000

18 12 06 00

06/07

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 07 Jun 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.92 N 77.01 W Meters AGL
Editorial Note on Part 40
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 40 appear at 79 FR 75740, Dec. 19, 2014.

§ 40.8 Information collection requirements: OMB approval. ( a ) The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has submitted the information collection requirements contained in this part to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for approval as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 *et seq.*). The NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. OMB has approved the information collection requirements contained in this part under control number 3150-0020.
( b ) The approved information collection requirements contained in this part appear in §§ 40.9, 40.14, 40.22, 40.23, 40.25, 40.26, 40.27, 40.31, 40.34, 40.35, 40.36, 40.41, 40.42, 40.43, 40.44, 40.51, 40.52, 40.53, 40.54, 40.55, 40.60, 40.61, 40.64, 40.65, 40.66, 40.67, and appendix A to this part.
( c ) This part contains information collection requirements in addition to those approved under the control number specified in paragraph (a) of this section. These information collection requirements and the control numbers under which they are approved are as follows: ( 1 ) In §§ 40.31, 40.43, 40.44, and appendix A, NRC Form 313 is approved under control number 3150-0120.
( 2 ) In § 40.31, DOC/NRC Forms AP-1, AP-A, and associated forms are approved under control numbers 0694-0135.
( 3 ) In § 40.31, IAEA Design Information Questionnaire forms are approved under control number 3150-0056.
( 4 ) In § 40.42, NRC Form 314 is approved under control number 3150-0028.
( 5 ) In § 40.64, DOE/NRC Form 741 is approved under control number 3150-0003.
( 6 ) In §§ 40.25 and 40.35, NRC Form 244 is approved under control number 3150-0031.
[49 FR 19626, May 9, 1984, as amended at 56 FR 40768, Aug. 16, 1991; 58 FR 68731, Dec. 29, 1993; 62 FR 52187, Oct. 6, 1997; 73 FR 78604, Dec. 23, 2008; 77 FR 39906, July 6, 2012; 78 FR 32338, May 29, 2013; 85 FR 65662, Oct. 16, 2020]
#### § 1040.71 Discrimination prohibited.

No handicapped person shall, because a recipient's facilities are inaccessible to or unuseable by handicapped persons, be denied the benefits of, be excluded from participation in, or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity that receives or benefits from Federal financial assistance from DOE.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

M IDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABA M A

OFFICE OF THE CLERK

POST OFFICE BOX 711

MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA 36101-0711

DEBRA P. HACKETT, CLERK

TELEPHONE (334) 954-3600

August 31, 2006

 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT

To: All Counsel of Record

Re: J.B. v. Wood 

Civil Action No. 2:06cv00755-WHA

The above-styled case has been reassigned to Judge Myron H. Thompson.

Please note that the case number is now 2:06cv00755-MHT. This new case number

should be used on all future correspondence and pleadings in this action.

 

Case 2:06-cv-00755-MHT-CSC Document 5 Filed 08/31/2006 Page 1 of 1
###### Editorial Note on Part 26

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 26 appear at 87 FR 71455, Nov. 22, 2022.

#### § 26.11 Communications.

Except where otherwise specified in this part, all communications, applications, and reports concerning the regulations in this part must be sent either by mail addressed to ATTN: NRC Document Control Desk, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001; by hand delivery to the NRC's offices at 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852-2738, between the hours of 8:15 a.m. and 4 p.m. eastern time; or, where practicable, by electronic submission, for example, via Electronic Information Exchange, e-mail, or CD-ROM. Electronic submissions must be made in a manner that enables the NRC to receive, read, authenticate, distribute, and archive the submission, and process and retrieve it a single page at a time. Detailed guidance on making electronic submissions can be obtained by visiting the NRC's Web site at *http://www.nrc.gov/site-help/e-submittals.html;* by e-mail to *MSHD.Resource@nrc.gov;* or by writing the Office of the Chief Information Officer, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001. The guidance discusses, among other topics, the formats the NRC can accept, the use of electronic signatures, and the treatment of nonpublic information. Copies of all communications must be sent to the appropriate regional office and resident inspector (addresses for the NRC Regional Offices are listed in Appendix D to Part 20 of this chapter).

[73 FR 17176, Mar. 31, 2008, as amended at 74 FR 62681, Dec. 1, 2009; 80 FR 74979, Dec. 1, 2015; 88 FR 57878, Aug. 24, 2023]
§ 1708.104 Confidentiality of safety investigations and privileged safety information. ( a ) Information obtained during the course of a preliminary safety inquiry or a formal safety investigation may be treated as confidential, safety privileged, and non-public by the Board and its staff, to the extent permissible under existing law. The information subject to this protection includes but is not limited to: Identity of witnesses; recordings; statements; testimony; transcripts; emails; all documents, whether or not obtained pursuant to Board subpoena; any conclusions based on privileged safety information; any deliberations or recommendations as to policies to be pursued; and all other related investigative proceedings and activities.
( b ) The Board shall have the discretion to assert the safety privilege when safety information, determined by the Board as protected from release, is sought by any private or public governmental entity or by parties to litigation who attempt to compel its release.
( c ) Nothing in this section voids or otherwise displaces the Board's legal obligations with respect to the Freedom of Information Act, the Government in the Sunshine Act, or any procedures or requirements contained in the Board's regulations issued pursuant to those Acts.
#### Carl W. Kellman, Appellee, v. John W. Tilton and Verdelle Tilton, Appellants.

Gen. No. 9,549.

opinion filed June 28, 1940;

rehearing denied September 21, 1940.

Steven Heifer, for appellants; Clark H. Countryman, for appellee.

Opinion by

Justice Huffman.

“Not to be published in full.”
Case 2:06-cv-00749-ID-SRW Document 17 Filed 01/28/2008 Page 1 of 1
Editorial Note on Part 26
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 26 appear at 87 FR 71455, Nov. 22, 2022.

§ 26.105 Preparing for the collection of a specimen for drug testing. ( a ) The collector shall ask the donor to remove any unnecessary outer garments, such as a coat or jacket, which might conceal items or substances that the donor could use to tamper with or adulterate his or her specimen. The collector shall ensure that all personal belongings such as a purse or briefcase remain with the outer garments outside of the room or stall in which the specimen is collected. The donor may retain his or her wallet.
( b ) The collector shall also ask the donor to empty his or her pockets and display the items in them to enable the collector to identify items that the donor could use to adulterate or substitute his or her urine specimen. The donor shall permit the collector to make this observation. If the donor refuses to show the collector the items in his or her pockets, this is considered a refusal to test. If an item is found that appears to have been brought to the collection site with the intent to adulterate or substitute the specimen, the collector shall contact the MRO or FFD program manager to determine whether a directly observed collection is required. If the item appears to have been inadvertently brought to the collection site, the collector shall secure the item and continue with the normal collection procedure. If the collector identifies nothing that the donor could use to adulterate or substitute the specimen, the donor may place the items back into his or her pockets.
( c ) The collector shall instruct the donor to wash and dry his or her hands before providing a specimen.
( d ) After washing his or her hands, the donor shall remain in the presence of the collector and may not have access to any water fountain, faucet, soap dispenser, cleaning agent, or other materials that he or she could use to adulterate the specimen.
( e ) The collector may select, or allow the donor to select, an individually wrapped or sealed urine specimen collection container from the collection kit materials or an oral fluid specimen collection device. Either the collector or the donor, with both present, shall unwrap or break the seal of the urine specimen collection container. With the exception of the collection container, the donor may not take anything from the collection kit into the room or stall used for urination.
[73 FR 17176, Mar. 31, 2008, as amended at 87 FR 71457, Nov. 22, 2022]
Exhibit 31.1





CHIEF
EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION





I, Ha
Quang Bui, certify that:





1. I have
reviewed this annual  report on Form 10-K of Cavico
Corp.:





2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report.





3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operation and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for,
the periods presented in this report.





4. The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:





a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;





b)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and





c)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and
15d-15(f))that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that
has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and





5. The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the Registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





a) all
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information: and





b) any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting.





Date:
      April 14,  2009
            
            
            /s/
      Ha Quang BuiHa
      Quang Bui
              Chief
      Executive Officer