alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
10.16


 


Director Fee Arrangements in 2017


 


Each director of MutualFirst Financial,
Inc. (the “Company”) also is a director of MutualBank. In 2017, each non-employee director received an annual fee of
$34,000 for serving on MutualBank’s Board of Directors as well as a Board meeting fee of $400 per Audit Committee meeting
attended and $200 for all other committee meetings attended. In addition to this annual fee, Wilbur R. Davis received a $10,000
annual fee for serving as Chairman of the Board of Directors, Linn Crull received a $5,000 annual fee for serving as Chairman of
the Audit Committee, Jerry McVicker received a $3,000 annual fee for serving as Chairman of the Compensation Committee and William
Hughes received a $3,000 annual fee for serving as Chairman of the Wealth Management Committee. Directors are not compensated for
their service on the Company’s Board of Directors.


 


MutualBank maintains deferred compensation
arrangements with some directors that previously allowed them to defer all or a portion of their Board fees in order to receive
income when they are no longer active directors. Previously deferred amounts earn interest at the rate of 10 percent per year.
EXHIBIT 35.4

SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

American Express Bank, FSB

American Express Issuance Trust II

Reporting Period January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2016

The undersigned, a duly
authorized officer of American Express Bank, FSB (AEFSB), a wholly-owned subsidiary of American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc. (TRS), pursuant to the Amended and Restated Supplemental Servicing Agreement, dated
as of March 12, 2013, among TRS, AEFSB, American Express Centurion Bank, and American Express Receivables Financing Corporation VIII LLC (as amended from time to time, the Agreement), does hereby certify
that:

1. AEFSB performs certain servicing procedures on behalf of TRS under the Agreement.

2. The undersigned is duly authorized to execute and deliver this Certificate.

3. A review of AEFSBs activities during the reporting period and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under my supervision.

4. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, AEFSB has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the reporting period.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this
9thday of March, 2017.



|                           |  |                                         
|-------------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------
|AMERICAN EXPRESS BANK, FSB
|                           | 
|By:                        |  | /s/ Denise D. Roberts                   
|Name:                      |  | Denise D. Roberts                       
|Title:                     |  | Chief Financial Officer                 
|                           | 
|By:                        |  | /s/ Brady P. Bagley                     
|Name:                      |  | Brady P. Bagley                         
|Title:                     |  | Vice President  Controller, U S Banking
#### Irving Roth, Doing Business as Roth & Steiner, Respondent, v. Nissim Sabat, Inc., Appellant.

Order entered February 24, 1970 granting plaintiff’s motion to punish defendant for contempt for failing to produce certain documents and to contingently strike defendant’s answer, and imposing a fine of $100 for defendant’s willful failure to comply with prior orders, and denying defendant’s cross-motion for a protective order is unanimously affirmed, with $75 costs and disbursements to respondent. The defendant has repeatedly flouted the court’s clear mandate and the fine assessed was warranted in the circumstances. The answer of the defendant is stricken and an accounting directed unless the defendant’s president appears, produces and makes available the books, records and documents as heretofore directed and submits to examination as previously ordered at Special Term, Part II, of the Supreme Court, New York County, on July 15, 1970, at 10 o’clock in the forenoon. Concur — Capozzoli, J. P., McGivern, Markewich, Nunez and McNally, JJ.
## Aero-Copters ofArizona, Incorporated P. 0. Box 640004 Bryce, Utah 84764 Phone: 435.834.5050 Email: cox@infowest.com
June 1. 2012
DocketManagement Facility U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE West Building Ground Floor Room W12-140 Washington, DC 20590
To Whom ItMay Concern: [ 

### co

Aero-Copters ofArizona, Inc. hereby petitions for exemption from Part 120 ofTitle 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) to allowAero-Copters ofArizona, Inc. to cover it's safety sensitive employees under one drug and alcohol testing program. Aero-Copters ofArizona, Inc. operates under FAR 135 (Certificate# DQBA289D) on demand, and holds a LOA(LOA# DQBJNM07) for sightseeing operations.
Due to the small number ofemployees (3 employees) and the fact that all three employees serve inboth capacities, there would be no reduction in safety involved. The public would be benefited by reduction ofredundant administration burden as a whole. Similar exemptions have beenissued for small companies such as ours, where many types of functions are combined due to small markets. Respectfully submitted,

# ;1kutJ~ Rebecca W. Cox, DER Aero-Copters ofArizona, Inc. P. 

### 0. Box 640004 Bryce, Utah 84764 435.834.5050 cox@infowest.com
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Darnell Oliver, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered March 31, 1978, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Judgment reversed, on the law, and case remanded to Criminal Term with a direction that the matter be transferred to the Family Court, Kings County. Defendant was arrested and indicted for the crimes of reckless endangerment in the first degree, coercion in the first degree, and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, arising out of an incident during which he threatened to use a kitchen knife to harm two of his children if a Family Court warrant was served upon him by police officers who had accompanied his wife to his apartment. The jury found the defendant guilty only of possession of a weapon in the third degree. Prior to its amendment and at the time of this offense, section 812 of the Family Court Act provided that the Family Court had "exclusive original jurisdiction * * * over any proceeding concerning acts which would constitute disorderly conduct, harassment, menacing, reckless endangerment, an assault or an attempt assault between spouses or between parent and child or between members of the same family or household.” Although *591the defendant was indicted for coercion and criminal possession of a weapon, these crimes were inextricably related by a common element to the reckless endangerment charge, and thus were within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Family Court (see *People v Jones,*59 AD2d 617). In addition, the People’s assertion that a family dispute was not involved here, but rather an attempt by the defendant to resist an arrest, involves a hypertechnical and unrealistic reading of the statute. The warrant of arrest was itself related to marital problems which the defendant and his wife were having. Therefore, the appropriate forum for the entire matter, in the first instance, was the Family Court (see *People v Johnson,*20 NY2d 220). Rabin, J. P., Gulotta, Cohalan and O’Connor, JJ., concur.
2007-1808.

#### State ex rel. Parks v. Court of Appeals, Seventh Appellate Dist.

In Procedendo. On motion to dismiss. Motion to dismiss granted. Cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.
Subpart 2114.70 - Applicability

Parent topic: PART 2114 - SEALED BIDDING

2114.7001 Applicability.

FAR part 14 has no practical application to the FEGLI Program because 5 U.S.C. chapter 87 exempts

the FEGLI Program from competitive bidding.
619.000 Scope of part.       (b) It is the Department's policy to provide maximum opportunities for U.S. small businesses to participate in the acquisition process. DOS contracts that are awarded domestically for performance overseas shall be subject to the Small Business Act as a matter of policy. Contracts that are both awarded and performed overseas should comply on a voluntary basis.    **Parent topic:** PART 619—SMALL BUSINESS PROGRAMS
1 

### Chew, Andrew

From: Dwight Mallory [Dmallory@resoluteenergy.com]

Sent: Friday, February 22, 2013 11:09 AM

To: Chew, Andrew

Subject: Re: MCU Main Flare Question

Andrew,

That is also correct. The flare doesn't have a spark igniter. It is equipped with an optical flame detector that detects the

presence of a pilot flame and alerts facility operations personnel if the pilot flame is absent.

Dwight Mallory

Resolute Energy Corporation

1675 Broadway, Suite 1950

Denver, CO 80202

Sent from my Blackberry 9000

From : Chew, Andrew [ mailto:Chew.Andrew@epa.gov ]

Sent : Friday, February 22, 2013 10:41 AM Mountain Standard Time

To : Dwight Mallory

Cc : Kelly, Shaheerah < Kelly.Shaheerah@epa.gov >

Subject : FW: MCU Main Flare Question

Dwight,

I’ve been asked to get confirmation that the main flare does not use a spark igniter. Is this correct also? Many thanks

again.

‐ Andrew

‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐

Andrew Chew, P.E.

T: (415) 947

‐ 4197 | F: (415) 947

‐ 3579 | chew.andrew@epa.gov

U.S. EPA, Region 9, Air Permits Office (AIR

‐ 3) | 75 Hawthorne St., San Francisco, CA 94105

From: Chew, Andrew

Sent: Friday, February 22, 2013 9:13 AM

To: Kelly, Shaheerah

Subject: FW: MCU Main Flare Question

Resolute says the flare uses a pilot. Thanks.

‐ Andrew

‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐

Andrew Chew, P.E.

T: (415) 947

‐ 4197 | F: (415) 947

‐ 3579 | chew.andrew@epa.gov

U.S. EPA, Region 9, Air Permits Office (AIR

‐ 3) | 75 Hawthorne St., San Francisco, CA 94105

From: Dwight Mallory [ mailto:Dmallory@resoluteenergy.com ]

Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2013 6:26 PM2 To: Chew, Andrew

Subject: Re: MCU Main Flare Question

Andrew,

You are correct. The flare uses a pilot.

Dwight Mallory

Resolute Energy Corporation

1675 Broadway, Suite 1950

Denver, CO 80202

Sent from my Blackberry 9000

From : Chew, Andrew [ mailto:Chew.Andrew@epa.gov ]

Sent : Thursday, February 21, 2013 05:27 PM Mountain Standard Time

To : Dwight Mallory

Cc : Kelly, Shaheerah < Kelly.Shaheerah@epa.gov >

Subject : RE: MCU Main Flare Question

Hi Dwight,

Please correct me if I’m wrong, but my understanding is that the Main Flare relies on a pilot flame. Thanks!

‐ Andrew

‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐

Andrew Chew, P.E.

T: (415) 947

‐ 4197 | F: (415) 947

‐ 3579 | chew.andrew@epa.gov

U.S. EPA, Region 9, Air Permits Office (AIR

‐ 3) | 75 Hawthorne St., San Francisco, CA 94105

From: Kelly, Shaheerah

Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2013 1:37 PM

To: Chew, Andrew

Subject: MCU Main Flare Question

Hi Andrew,

Can you check with Resolute on whether the MCU Main Flare uses a pilot flame or spark igniter, or a combination of

both? It would be helpful for Resolute to give us this information this month.

Thanks.

************************************

Shaheerah Kelly

U.S. Environmental Protec tion Agency, Region 9

Permits Office, Air Division

San Francisco, CA 94105

Phone: 415-947-4156

Fax: 415-947-3579

Email: kelly.shaheerah@epa.gov
Exhibit 10.10 


AMENDMENT

TO THE

HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC. SUPPLEMENTAL PENSION PLAN


	
  

 	
  

 
	
  

 	
           Pursuant
 to the authority granted to proper officers of Honeywell International Inc.
 (the “Company”) by the Management Development and Compensation Committee of
 the Board of Directors on December 11, 2009, the Honeywell International Inc.
 Supplemental Pension Plan shall be amended effective January 1, 2010 to
 include as eligible pay for an eligible participant (defined below) the
 greater of (a) the incentive compensation received under the terms of the
 Honeywell International Inc. Incentive Compensation Plan for Executive
 Employees (“ICP”) in 2009 (earned in 2008), or (b) the incentive compensation
 received under the terms of the ICP in 2010 (earned for 2009); provided,
 however, that if incentive compensation is included under clause (a), the
 value of the incentive compensation received in 2009 (earned in 2008) shall
 be reduced by the actual incentive compensation received and credited to
 Honeywell’s qualified pension plans and/or non-qualified pension plans in
 2010 (earned for 2009) to avoid double counting. If incentive compensation is
 included under clause (a), such incentive compensation shall be treated under
 the applicable pension formula as eligible pay earned in 2009 and paid in
 2010. 

 
	
  

 	
  

 
	
  

 	
           This
 amendment shall be subject to the following conditions: 

 






	
  

 	
  

 	
  

 	
  

 	
  

 	
  

 
	
  

 	
  

 	
 (a)

 	
 an eligible
 participant is a participant who, on March 15, 2010, is earning a pension
 benefit under the Honeywell Retirement Earnings Plan and is employed by the
 Company in Band 5, 6 or 7, other than: 

 
	
  

 	
  

 	
  

 	
  

 	
 1.

 	
 the Chief
 Executive Officer of the Company; and 

 
	
  

 	
  

 	
  

 	
  

 	
 2.

 	
 a
 participant who receives zero incentive compensation in 2010 (earned for
 2009) and is coded in the Company’s records as having a performance planning
 reason for such (e.g., “performance issue” (PI) or “performance termination”
 (PT)); and 

 
	
  

 	
  

 	
 (b)

 	
 the amounts
 required to be included in eligible pay shall not be included more than one
 time. 

 






	
  

 	
  

 
	
  

 	
 HONEYWELL
 INTERNATIONAL INC.

 
	
  

 	
  

 
	
  

 	
  

 
	
  

 	
 /s/ Mark
 James

 
	
  

 	
 Mark James

 
	
  

 	
 Senior Vice
 President – Human Resources and Communications

 
	
  

 	
  

 
	
  

 	
  

 
	
 Dated:
 January 12, 2010
2813.70-2 Procedures.       (a) The certified invoice procedure for purchases may be used only under FAR part 13 and this part, subject to the following:          (1) The individual transaction amount does not exceed the micro-purchase threshold;          (2) Availability of sufficient funds is verified;          (3) A purchase order is not required by either the supplier or the Government;          (4) The vendor submits approved and appropriate invoices; and,          (5) The items purchased are domestic source end products, except as provided in FAR subpart 25.1.          (b) Using the certified invoice procedures does not eliminate the requirements in FAR part 13 that apply to purchases at or below the micro-purchase threshold.          (c) The chief of the contracting office, as defined in JAR 2802.101, may delegate the authority to use the certified invoice procedure. Each delegation must specify any limitations placed on the individual's use of these procedures, such as limits on the amount of each purchase, or limits on the commodities, or services being procured.          (d) Individuals using this purchasing technique shall require the supplier to immediately submit properly prepared invoices that itemize property or services furnished. Upon receiving the invoice, the individual making the purchase shall annotate the invoice with the date of receipt, verify the accuracy of the invoiced amount and verify on the invoice that the supplies and/or services have been received and accepted. If the invoice is valid and correct, the individual making the purchase shall sign the invoice indicating acceptance and immediately forward it to the appropriate administrative office.          (e) The administrative office must approve the invoice and, if approved, forward it to the Finance Office for payment. Before forwarding the invoice to the Finance Office, the administrative office shall place the following statement on the invoice, along with the accounting and appropriation data:    **Parent topic:** Subpart 2813.70 - Certified Invoice Procedure
H. Res. 227

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

April 26, 2005.

Whereas the United States is deeply enriched by its Indian

American residents;

Whereas the Indian American community and the graduates

of the Indian Institutes of Technology (IIT) in the

United States have made valuable and significant contributions to society in every profession and discipline;

and

Whereas IIT graduates are highly committed and dedicated

to research, innovation, and promotion of trade and

international cooperation between India and the United

States: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

(1) recognizes the valuable and significant contributions of Indian Americans to American society;

(2) honors the economic innovation attributable to

graduates of the Indian Institutes of Technology; and

(3) urges all Americans to recognize the contributions of Indian Americans and have a greater apprecia-
2

•HRES 227 EH

tion of the role Indian Americans have played in helping

to advance and enrich American society.

Attest:

Clerk.
§ 15.25 Personal interviews. ( a ) The NRC may seek an interview with the debtor at the offices of the NRC when— ( 1 ) A matter involved in the claim needs clarification;
( 2 ) Information is needed concerning the debtor's circumstances; or
( 3 ) An agreement for payment might be negotiated.
( b ) The NRC shall grant an interview with a debtor upon the debtor's request. The NRC will not reimburse a debtor's interview expenses.
[47 FR 7616, Feb. 22, 1982, as amended at 55 FR 32378, Aug. 9, 1990]
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.2


   CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of SEDONA Corporation on Form
10-QSB for the quarter ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Quarterly Report"), I, Anita M.
Primo, Chief Financial Officer of SEDONA Corporation certify, pursuant Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
         (1) The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
         (2) The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
SEDONA Corporation.


Dated: May 17, 2006                  /s/ ANITA M. PRIMO
                                     ------------------------------------------
                                     Anita M. Primo
                                     Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
                                     (Principal Financial Officer)
Case 2:06-cv-00717-ID-SRW Document 85 Filed 09/12/2007 Page 1 of 5
Case 2:06-cv-00717-ID-SRW Document 85 Filed 09/12/2007 Page 2 of 5
Case 2:06-cv-00717-ID-SRW Document 85 Filed 09/12/2007 Page 3 of 5
Case 2:06-cv-00717-ID-SRW Document 85 Filed 09/12/2007 Page 4 of 5
Case 2:06-cv-00717-ID-SRW Document 85 Filed 09/12/2007 Page 5 of 5
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 33 (Friday, February 19, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 7540]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-3183]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Area 6 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel (Including the 
States of Arizona, Colorado, Idaho, Montana, New Mexico, North Dakota, 
Oregon, South Dakota, Utah, Washington, and Wyoming)

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Area 6 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be 
conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comment, 
ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal 
Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Tuesday, March 2, 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Janice Spinks at 1-888-912-1227 or 
206-220-6098.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that an open meeting of the Area 6 Taxpayer Advocacy Panel will be held 
Tuesday, March 2, 2010, at 1 p.m. Pacific Time via telephone 
conference. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit 
written statements for consideration. Due to limited conference lines, 
notification of intent to participate must be made with Janice Spinks. 
For more information, please contact Ms. Spinks at 1-888-912-1227 or 
206-220-6098, or write TAP Office, 915 2nd Avenue, MS W-406, Seattle, 
WA 98174 or post comments to the Web site: http://www.improveirs.org.
    The agenda will include various IRS issues.

    Dated: February 12, 2010.
Linda Rivera,
Senior Program Analyst, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. 2010-3183 Filed 2-18-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
#### In the Matter of Castaenzo F. Ciulla, Appellant, v. James M. Power et al., Constituting the Board of Elections of the City of New York, Respondents.

Judgement unanimously affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. No opinion. Concur — Eager, J. P., Capozzoli, Tilzer, Markewich and Hunez,JJ.
§ 217.50 Policy. ( a ) It is the policy of the Federal Government that the allocations authority under title I of the Defense Production Act may: ( 1 ) Only be used when there is insufficient supply of a material, service, or facility to satisfy national defense supply requirements through the use of the priorities authority or when the use of the priorities authority would cause a severe and prolonged disruption in the supply of materials, services, or facilities available to support normal U.S. economic activities; and
( 2 ) Not be used to ration materials or services at the retail level.
( b ) Allocation orders, when used, will be distributed equitably among the suppliers of the materials, services, or facilities being allocated and not require any person to relinquish a disproportionate share of the civilian market.
| (logo) WELLS            FARGO | Corporate Trust ServicesMAC R1204-010 9062 Old Annapolis Road

Columbia, MD 21045

 

Tel:  410 884 2000

Fax: 410 715 2380 |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

 

Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Cor p oration 

60 Wall Street 

New York, New York 10005 

 

 

 

RE: Annual Statement of Compliance for COMM 2012-CCRE5 Commercial Mortgage 

             Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2012-CCRE5  

 

 

Per the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of December 1, 2012 (the "Agreement"), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Certificate Administrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2014 (the "Reporting Period"): 

 

 

(a) A review of Wells Fargo's activities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under such officer's supervision; and 

 

(b) To the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period. 

 

 

 

March 9, 2015 

 

 

/s/  Brian Smith 

BRIAN SMITH 

Vice President

 

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. |  |
|------------------------|--|