alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 320 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 320

 Congratulating Danica Patrick on her historic accomplishments in the 
                         2005 Indianapolis 500.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 15, 2005

Mr. Manzullo submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                   the Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Congratulating Danica Patrick on her historic accomplishments in the 
                         2005 Indianapolis 500.

Whereas Danica Patrick was raised in Roscoe, Illinois, began racing go-karts at 
        age 10, and by the age of 12 became a national champion of the World 
        Karting Association;
Whereas at age 16, Danica Patrick switched from go-karts to formula cars and 
        began competing in the Formula Vauxhall Winter Series in England;
Whereas in 2000, Danica Patrick finished second in the Formula Ford Festival in 
        England, the highest finish ever by an American driver;
Whereas on May 15, 2005, Danica Patrick qualified for the Indianapolis 500 with 
        the fourth fastest time, becoming the highest qualifying female driver 
        in the history of the event;
Whereas on May 29, 2005, Danica Patrick competed in her first Indianapolis 500 
        race;
Whereas Danica Patrick's appearance in the 2005 Indianapolis 500 was just her 
        fifth overall appearance in an Indy Racing League IndyCar Series race;
Whereas on lap 57, Danica Patrick became the first woman ever to lead a lap of 
        the Indianapolis 500;
Whereas Danica Patrick battled setbacks to move from sixteenth place after lap 
        80 to first place on lap 172;
Whereas Danica Patrick led the 2005 Indianapolis 500 at 3 different times during 
        the race for a total of 19 laps;
Whereas Danica Patrick's fourth place finish in the Indianapolis 500 was the 
        all-time highest finish by a rookie driver and the all-time highest 
        finish by a female driver;
Whereas Danica Patrick was awarded the 2005 Indianapolis 500 Rookie of the Year 
        award; and
Whereas at only 23 years of age, Danica Patrick has already made historic 
        achievements as a professional driver: Now therefore, be it
    Resolved,  That the House of Representatives--
            (1) congratulates Danica Patrick on her historic 
        accomplishments in the 2005 Indianapolis 500;
            (2) invites Danica Patrick and her team to the United 
        States Capitol to be honored; and
            (3) directs the Clerk of the House of Representatives to 
        make available an enrolled copy of this resolution to Danica 
        Patrick for appropriate display.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.1

              CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63
                      OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE

         In connection with the quarterly report of Simclar, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Barry
J. Pardon, President of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof,
solely for purpose of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States
Code, that to the best of my knowledge:

                  (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

                  (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company.

         This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, "filed" with
the Securities and Exchange Commission.

                                                 /s/ Barry J. Pardon
                                                 ------------------------------
                                                 Barry J. Pardon, President
                                                 Simclar, Inc.
                                                 May 14, 2004
#### § 987.39 The establishment of minimum standards.

In order to effectuate the declared policy of the act, all dates handled as marketable dates shall meet the requirements of U.S. Grade C, or if for further processing, U.S. Grade C (Dry) of the effective U.S. Standards for Grades of Dates, 7 CFR 52.1001: *Provided,* That the Secretary, may upon recommendation of the Committee, prescribe other minimum standards of grades and sizes for marketable dates of any variety to be handled in any designated outlet. To aid the Secretary in prescribing such other minimum standards, the Committee shall furnish to the Secretary the data upon which it acted in recommending such standards. The provisions hereof relating to minimum standards of grades and sizes for marketable dates and inspection requirements, within the meaning of section 2(3) of the act, and any other provisions relating to the administration and enforcement thereof shall continue in effect irrespective of whether the season average price to producers for dates is or is not in excess of the parity level specified in section 2(1) of the act. Notice of the minimum standard regulation shall be sent by the Committee to all handlers of record. On and after the effective date of such regulations no handler shall handle dates except in accordance with such minimum standard.

[32 FR 12596, Aug. 31, 1967, as amended at 43 FR 4252, Feb. 1, 1978]
1615.7001 Audit and records.       The Contracting officer will modify 52.215–2 in all FEHB Program experience-rated contracts by amending paragraph (g) of that section to replace the words “exceed the simplified acquisition threshold” with “equals or exceeds $550,000.” This amount shall be adjusted by the same amount and at the same time as any change to the threshold for application of the Truth in Negotiations Act pursuant to 41 U.S.C. 254b(a)(7).    **Parent topic:** Subpart 1615.70—Audit and Records—Negotiation
§ 205.286 Limitations on amount of refunds. ( a ) The aggregate amount of all refunds approved by the Office of Hearings and Appeals or its designee in a given case shall not exceed the amount to be remitted pursuant to the relevant DOE enforcement order, plus any accumulated interest, reduced by the amount of any administrative costs approved by the Office of Hearings and Appeals. In the event that the aggregate amount of approved claims exceeds the aggregate amount of funds specified above, the Office of Hearings and Appeals may make refunds on a pro rata basis. The Office of Hearings and Appeals may delay payment of any refunds until all Applications have been processed.
( b ) The Office of Hearings and Appeals may decline to consider Applications for refund amounts that, in view of the direct administrative costs involved, are too small to warrant individual consideration.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION

DELOISE PRICE, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

v. ) 2:06cv721-MHT

) 

WAL-MART STORES, INC., )

)

Defendant. )

ORDER

For the reasons stated in open court on January 28,

2008, it is ORDERED that a mistrial is DECLARED in this

case.

It is further ORDERED that the jury selection and

retrial of this cause are set for April 14, 2008, at

10:00 a.m. at the Frank M. Johnson, Jr. United States

Courthouse Complex, Courtroom 2FMJ, One Church Street,

Montgomery, Alabama, 36104.

DONE, this the 29th day of January, 2008.

 /s/ Myron H. Thompson 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00721-MHT-TFM Document 52 Filed 01/29/2008 Page 1 of 1
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

IN RE: CANVASS OF ABSENTEE AND

MAIL

- IN BALLOTS OF NOVEMBER 3, 2020

GENERAL ELECTION

PETITION OF: PHILADELPHIA COUNTY

BOARD OF ELECTIONS :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No s . 89

- 93 EM 2020

O RDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 18 th day of November , 2020

, the Application for the Court to

Exercise Extraordinary Jurisdiction over the Commonwealth Court’s Cases Docketed at

1140 CD 2020, 1139 CD 2020, 1138 CD 2020, 1137 CD 2020, and 1136 CD 2020, filed

by the Philadelphia County Board of Elections , is hereby G RANTED with respect to the

following issue:

Does the Election Code require county boards of elections to disqualify mail

- in or absentee ballots submitted by qualified electors who signed their ballot’s outer envelopes but did not
handwrite their name, their address, and/or a date, where no fraud or irregularity has been alleged?

The Commonwealth Court shall immediately transfer the contents of its records for

these cases to this Court, including the briefs requested and received from the parties.

Chief Justice Saylor and Justice Mundy note their dissent.
Exhibit 99.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

I, Gregory A. Wells, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

To the best of my knowledge and belief, the quarterly report on Form 10-Q filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on May 15, 2003, by NTS-Properties VI, a Maryland Limited
Partnership and to which this certification is appended (the "Periodic Report") fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information
contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of NTS-Properties VI, a Maryland Limited Partnership.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
NTS-Properties VI, a Maryland Limited Partnership and will be retained by NTS-Properties VI, a
Maryland Limited Partnership and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.

/s/ Gregory A. Wells
Chief Financial Officer of NTS Capital Corporation,
General Partner of NTS-Properties Associates VI,
General Partner of NTS-Properties VI, a Maryland Limited Partnership
Exhibit 35.2



LOGO

Feb 28, 2018

Servicer
Compliance Statement

For SEMT 2012-6 (see Schedule A)

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of First Republic Bank (the Servicer), does hereby certify that:



| | (i) | a review of the Servicers activities during the reporting period from January 1, 2017 through December 31, 2017 and of its performance under the Agreement (as defined on Schedule A attached hereto) from
the above referenced trust during such period has been made under such officers supervision, and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | to the best of such officers knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under this Agreement in all material respects throughout such reporting period.
| | ---- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



First Republic BankBy: /s/ Ron TremblayName: Ron TremblayTitle: Vice President of Residential LendingDate: Feb. 28, 2018


San Francisco  Palo Alto  Los Angeles  Santa Barbara  Newport Beach  San Diego 
Portland  Palm Beach  Boston  Greenwich  New York





111 PINE STREET, SAN FRANCISCO,
CALIFORNIA 94111, TEL (415) 392-1400 OR (800) 392-1400, FAX (415) 392-1413 WWW.FIRSTREPUBLIC.COM  MEMBER FDIC AND


LOGO
 EQUAL HOUSING LENDER



---

LOGO

<for SEMT 2012-6>

SCHEDULE A



| | 1. | Flow Mortgage Loan Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of July 1, 2010, between Redwood Residential Acquisition Corporation and First Republic Bank, as modified by the Reconstitution Agreement dated
November 30, 2012 (the Agreement).
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

San Francisco  Palo Alto  Los Angeles  Santa Barbara 
Newport Beach  San Diego  Portland  Palm Beach  Boston  Greenwich  New York





111 PINE STREET, SAN FRANCISCO,
CALIFORNIA 94111, TEL (415) 392-1400 OR (800) 392-1400, FAX (415) 392-1413 WWW.FIRSTREPUBLIC.COM  MEMBER FDIC AND


LOGO
 EQUAL HOUSING LENDER
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                          52,367
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                       1,450,299
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 1,601
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    641,942
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                      1,660,372
<ALLOWANCE>                                     25,158
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,468,199
<DEPOSITS>                                   1,635,197
<SHORT-TERM>                                   243,015
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                             21,502
<LONG-TERM>                                    338,957
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        17,369
<OTHER-SE>                                     212,159
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               2,468,199
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 37,628
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                9,092
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   212
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                46,932
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              16,290
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              23,770
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           23,162
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      863
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 546
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  4,760
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 11,401
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      11,401
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,798
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.45
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.45
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       0
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                     0
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                    0
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
Case 2:06-cr-00206-MHT-CSC Document 80 Filed 05/19/2008 Page 1 of 1
227 So.2d 147

#### Fred L. LEAVINES v. Mrs. Rena Page Newman LEAVINES.

No. 50062.

Oct. 23, 1969.

In re: Mrs. Rena Newman Leavines applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, Parish of Jefferson. 224 So.2d 26.

The application is denied. There appears no error of law in the judgment complained of.

BARHAM, J.,

is of the opinion the writ should be granted. See dissent in Montz v. Montz, 253 La. 897, 221 So.2d 40 at p. 43.
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 32


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Integra Bank Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of
the undersigned certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Michael T. Vea
-----------------------
Chief Executive Officer
August 6, 2004



/s/ Charles A. Caswell
-----------------------
Chief Financial Officer
August 6, 2004
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

RALPH WILSON LINGO, )

)

 Petitioner, )

)

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:06-CV-703-MHT

)

SHERIFF HERBIE JOHNSON, et al., )

)

 Respondents. )

ORDER ON MOTION

Upon review of the amended petition filed by the petitioner on October 19, 2006

(Court Doc. No. 18), and for good cause, it is

ORDERED that:

1. The most recently filed amended petition (Court Doc. No. 18) be substituted for

the previous amended petition filed on October 17, 2006 (Court Doc. No. 16). 

2. The October 17, 2006 amended petition (Court Doc. No. 16) be stricken from the

docket in this case.

3. This cause of action shall henceforth proceed only on the claims presented in the

amended petition filed on October 19, 2006 (Court Doc. No. 18). 

4. The respondents shall file an answer addressing the claims presented in the

October 19, 2006 amended petition (Court Doc. No. 18) in accordance with the directives

of the order entered on October 18, 2006. 

Case 1:06-cv-00703-MHT-CSC Document 19 Filed 10/20/2006 Page 1 of 2
2

The Clerk is DIRECTED to mail a copy of the October 19, 2006 amended petition

(Court Doc. No. 18) and this order to the Attorney General of the State of Alabama and

cause a copy of the same to be served upon Sheriff Herbie Johnson. 

Done this 20th day of October, 2006.

 /s/Charles S. Coody 

CHARLES S. COODY

CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00703-MHT-CSC Document 19 Filed 10/20/2006 Page 2 of 2
###### Editorial Note on Part 26

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 26 appear at 87 FR 71455, Nov. 22, 2022.

#### § 26.409 Sanctions.

Licensees and other entities who implement an FFD program under this subpart shall establish sanctions for FFD policy violations that, at a minimum, prohibit the individuals specified in § 26.4(f) from being assigned to construct or direct the construction of safety- or security-related SSCs unless or until the licensee or other entity determines that the individual's condition or behavior does not pose a potential risk to public health and safety or the common defense and security.

[75 FR 73941, Nov. 30, 2010]
Filed by sedaredgar.com - Caleco Pharma Corp - Exhibit 10.4






CALECO PHARMA CORP.

February 10, 2010

Natac Biotech S.L.
Calle Ana de Austria 
7 Ptl 2 –
2D
Boadilla del Monte (Madrid), Spain

Attention: Antonio Delgado Romero

Dear Sirs:

	Re: 	Lab
      Facilities and Services Agreement 


Caleco Pharma Corp. (the “Company”) and Natac Biotech
  S.L. (“Natac”) are in the process of negotiating a lab facilities
  and services agreement whereby Natac will provide the Company with access to
  a laboratory facility and certain laboratory services (the “Proposed Agreement”).

1.         Exclusivity 

1.1       Natac agrees that,
  during a 60 day period from execution of this letter agreement, it will not
  seek or solicit, or engage anyone to seek or solicit, or negotiate with other
  suitors to enter into a lab facilities and services agreement (the “Exclusive
  Period”).

2.          Consideration


2.1       In consideration
of the Exclusive Period, the Company has agreed to:

	 	(a) 	
      pay 20,000 Euros on execution of this letter agreement
      (the “Payment”); and

	 	 	 
	 	(b) 	
      issue to Natac a non-interest bearing promissory note in
      the amount of 130,000 Euros (the “Promissory Note”), payable within thirty
      days of this letter agreement.



2.2       If Natac and
Caleco enter into the Proposed Agreement, Natac shall apply the Payment and any
payments under the Promissory Note to the amounts to be paid under the Proposed
Agreement.

2.3       In the event that
  Natac and Caleco are unable to enter into the Proposed Agreement within sixty
  days of this letter agreement, Natac will retain the Payment and any payments
  made under the Promissory Note, as a compensation for the assessment and consulting
  during the negotiation period.

3.          Executed in
  Counterparts 

3.1        This letter
  agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which so executed
  shall constitute an original and all of which together shall constitute one
  and the same letter agreement.




Please sign where indicated below to indicate your concurrence
with our understanding.

Yours truly,

CALECO PHARMA CORP.

Per:/s/ John
Boschert_____________
      John
Boschert
      President

Agreed and accepted as of the 10th day of February, 2010.

NATAC BIOTECH S.L.

Per:/s/ Antonio Delgado Romero____

      Antonio Delgado Romero

      President
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANTTO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of SEDONA Corporation on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Quarterly Report"), I, Marco A. Emrich, Chief Executive Officer of SEDONA Corporation certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of SEDONA Corporation.

| Dated: August 10, 2004 | /s/ MARCO A. EMRICH                          |
|------------------------|----------------------------------------------|
|                   | Marco A. Emrich                              |
|                   | President and Chief Executive        Officer |
|                   | (Principal Executive Officer)                |

20

----
Subpart 3018.1—Available Acquisition

Flexibilities

Parent topic: PART 3018—EMERGENCY ACQUISITIONS

3018.109 Priorities and allocations.

DHS Components may assign priority ratings on contracts and orders as authorized by the Defense

Priorities and Allocation System (DPAS).