alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

ANGELA PRICE, )

 )

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:06cv742-MEF

)

ROANOKE CITY BOARD OF )

EDUCATION, )

)

Defendant. )

ORDER

It is 

ORDERED that this matter is set for a mediation conference on November 15,

2007, at 9:00 a.m. in Courtroom 5A, United States Courthouse, One Church Street,

Montgomery, Alabama. It is further

ORDERED that counsel and the parties or a representative with full authority to

settle the case shall appear at and attend this conference. Plaintiff should be prepared to

present documents substantiating any claims for damages.

If counsel have not held a good faith, face-to-face settlement conference as

required in the Court’s scheduling order, counsel shall hold this conference not less than

seven days prior to the date set for mediation. On or before the close of business on

November 8, 2007, each party shall provide the undersigned judge with a confidential

mediation conference statement. The statement should not be filed with the Clerk’s

office and should not be served on the other parties. The parties may transmit the

statement to chambers by facsimile at (334) 954-3735. The statement is solely for the

Court’s use in preparing for the mediation conference. The statement shall be limited to

ten (10) pages and should include:

1. An estimate of the costs of future litigation in this case, including the cost of

Case 3:06-cv-00742-MEF-WC Document 38 Filed 11/02/2007 Page 1 of 2
2

trial and trial preparation;

2. A history of the litigation and past settlement discussions including the results

of the face-to-face settlement conference;

3. A explanation of the party’s claims or defenses and a candid assessment of the

strengths and weaknesses of those claims or defenses;

4. A candid statement of the following:

a. the party’s objectives in this litigation.

b. the nature of the relationship between the party and counsel.

c. sensitive issues or matters.

5. The relief sought -- where damages are sought, the party should provide the

court with evidence supporting the damage request. 

6. A full and complete explanation of any subrogation claims and how these

claims impact on the plaintiff’s claim for damages.

7. Counsel’s candid assessment of any impediments to settlement.

8. Counsel’s assessment about whether opening statements from counsel will

benefit the mediation process.

In addition to the foregoing, prior to the mediation conference counsel shall confer

and attempt to agree upon the form and contents of mutual releases for execution if this

case is settled.

DONE this 2nd day of November, 2007.

/s/ Wallace Capel, Jr.

WALLACE CAPEL, JR.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-00742-MEF-WC Document 38 Filed 11/02/2007 Page 2 of 2
#### § 434.509 Compliance.

509.1 If the Design Energy Cost is less than or equal to the Energy Cost Budget, and all of the minimum requirements of subsection 501.2 are met, the Proposed Design complies with the standards.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Norman Lipton, Appellant.

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The court’s failure to charge that witnesses Stephen Raia, Patrick Ryder and Jane Otto were accomplices as a matter of law was error. In a conference among the court, defense counsel and the prosecuting attorney prior to the charge, it was agreed that the jury would be instructed that said witnesses were accomplices as a matter of law. Contrary to that agreement, however, the court charged that their status was to be determined as a question of fact. The issue is not preserved for review, however, because defendant failed to except to the charge as given (see CPL 470.05, subd 2; *People v Cona,*49 NY2d 26, 33). We conclude on this record that had a proper exception been taken, or had a request been made, the court, in light of its prior agreement, would have given the appropriate charge. Moreover, at the end of the charge when the trial court had failed to so charge and at a time when the failure could readily have been corrected, counsel did not except or object to the charge as given. Such inaction under the circumstances may not serve to preserve this issue for review *(People v Robinson,*36 NY 2d 224, 228). We also decline to review the issue in the interest of justice (see *People v Tremblay,*77 AD2d 807; CPL 470.15). The other issues raised by defendant are without merit. (Appeal from judgment of Onondaga Supreme Court—criminal sale controlled substance, third degree, and other charges.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Cardamone, Schnepp, Doerr and Witmer, JJ.
Order entered Novem ber 7 , 2014

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 1 4
- 0 0086
- CR No. 05
- 1 4
- 0 0087
- CR
JOSEPH GUERRA , Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 219th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No s . 219
- 82353
- 2012, 219
- 81886
- 2013



### O RDER
The Court REINSTATE S the appeals. On October 21, 2014, we ordered the trial court to make findings regarding why appellant’s brief ha d not been filed. On November 6, 2014, we received ap pellant’s brief, together with an extension motion. Therefore, in the interest of expediting the appeals, we
VACATE the October 21, 2014 order requiring findings.
We GRANT the November 6, 2014 extension motion and ORDER appellant’s brief
filed as of the d ate of this order.

/s/ ADA BROWN JUSTICE
PGI 209.202 Policy.       (a)(1) The inclusion of qualification requirements in specifications for products that are to be included on a Qualified Products List, or manufactured by business firms included on a Qualified Manufacturers List, requires approval by the departmental standardization office in accordance with DoD 4120.24-M, Defense Standardization Program (DSP) Policies and Procedures. The inclusion of other qualification requirements in an acquisition or group of acquisitions requires approval by the chief of the contracting office.    **Parent topic:** PGI 209.2 -QUALIFICATIONS REQUIREMENTS
###### Editorial Note on Part 26

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 26 appear at 87 FR 71455, Nov. 22, 2022.

#### § 26.73 Applicability.

The requirements in this subpart apply to the licensees and other entities identified in § 26.3(a), (b), and, as applicable, (c) for the categories of individuals specified in § 26.4(a) through (d) and (g). The requirements in this subpart also apply to the licensees and other entities specified in § 26.3(c), as applicable, for the categories of individuals in § 26.4(e). At the discretion of a licensee or other entity in § 26.3(c), the requirements of this subpart also may be applied to the categories of individuals identified in § 26.4(f). In addition, the requirements in this subpart apply to the entities in § 26.3(d) to the extent that a licensee or other entity relies on the C/V to meet the requirements of this subpart. The regulations in this subpart also apply to the individuals specified in § 26.4(h) and (j), as appropriate.
Exhibit No. 32.  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the report of Questar Pipeline Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), R. Allan Bradley, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and S. E. Parks, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  QUESTAR PIPELINE COMPANY   May 13, 2009 /s/R. Allan Bradley R. Allan Bradley President and Chief Executive Officer    May 13, 2009 /s/S. E. Parks S. E. Parks Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
###### Editorial Note on Part 34

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 34 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

#### § 34.75 Records of alarm system and entrance control checks at permanent radiographic installations.

Each licensee shall maintain records of alarm system and entrance control device tests required under § 34.33 and retain each record for 3 years after it is made.
### NUMBER 13 - 14 - 00490 - C V COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

IN R E PRIME INSURANCE COMPANY

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

ORDER Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Perkes and Longoria Order Per Curiam On October 16, 2014, this Court conditionally granted a petition for writ of mandamus filed by Prime Insurance Company (“Prime”) seeking to enforce a forum selection clause. See In r e Prime Ins. Co. , No. 13

- 14

- 00490

- CV, 2014 WL 5314514, at *1 (Tex. App.

— Corpus Christi Oct. 16, 2014, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.). Specifically,

we direct ed the trial court to vacate its orders denying Prime's motions to dismiss the underlying lawsuit an d to sign an order granting Prime's motion to dismiss the underlying lawsuit

. See id. at *12. On October 31, 2014, r eal parties in interest, RZQ, L.L.C., Hameed Quraishi, M.D., Rafath Quraishi, M.D., Aadam Quraishi, and Advanced Medical Imaging, L.L.C., filed a2

motion for rehearing. That same day, Prime filed an “Unopposed Emergency Motion for Temporary Relief” through which it seeks to stay trial court proceedings pending disposition of the motion for rehearing. According to Prime, the trial court has set a hearing for November 4, 2014 at 9:00 a.m. on Prime’s motion to dismiss , despite this Court’s ruling, and appellees have served Prime with a subpoena duces tecum requesting that Prime produce a witness and documents, at that same hearing, pertaining to other claims or lawsuits involving Prime policies over a four

- year period of time. We assume that the forementioned trial court proceedings must have been scheduled in error because we are confident that the trial court and parties would not intention ally violate this Court’s directive. Accordingly, t he Court, having examined and fully considered the foregoing sequence of events, is of the opinion that Prime’s motion to stay all trial court proceedings should be granted. The emergency motion for temp orary relief is hereby GRANTED, and t he trial court proceedings are ordered STAYED pending further order of this Court, or until the motion for rehearing is finally decided. See T EX

. R.
A PP

. P . 52.10(b) (“Unless vacated or modified, an order granting temporary relief is effective until the case is finally decided.”). The Court further requests that Prime file a response to the real parties’ motion for rehearing. Such response should be due i n the offices of this Court within ten days from the date of this order. IT IS SO ORDERED. PER CURIAM
D elivered and filed th e 3rd day of November , 201 4

.
Searched for **https://www.ssa.gov/pubs/ES-05-10935.pdf**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **https://www.ssa.gov/pubs/ES-05-10935.pdf**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 284 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 284

   Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to repeal the 
                     provisional quorum provision.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 17, 2005

Mr. Baird submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                           Committee on Rules

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Amending the Rules of the House of Representatives to repeal the 
                     provisional quorum provision.

    Resolved,  That paragraph (c) of clause 5 of rule XX of the Rules 
of the House of Representatives (relating to provisional quorums) is 
repealed and that paragraph (d) of such clause is redesignated as 
paragraph (c).
                                 <all>
```
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection withthe Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of ImClone Systems Incorporated (the “Company”)for the quarter ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Daniel S. Lynch, ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, and Michael J. Howerton, Chief FinancialOfficer of the Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

(1)   The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.
|                     | /s/ DANIEL S. LYNCH        |
|---------------------|----------------------------|
|                | Daniel S. Lynch            |
| * *            | *Chief  Executive Officer* |
| August 9, 2005 |                       |
|                | /s/  MICHAEL J. HOWERTON   |
|                | Michael J.  Howerton       |
| * *            | *Chief  Financial Officer* |
| August 9, 2005 |                       |

 

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent requiredby the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposesof Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement requiredby Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained bythe Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.

----
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

In re The Good Shepherd Hospital, Inc.

No. 06-18-00115-CV

Original Mandamus Proceeding

Opinion delivered by Justice Carter*, Chief 

Justice Morriss and Justice Burgess, 

participating. *Justice Carter, Retired, 

Sitting by Assignment.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find that Relator’s petition for writ of 

mandamus should be conditionally granted. The writ will issue only if the trial court fails to 

comply.

RENDERED MARCH 6, 2019

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of ImClone Systems
Incorporated (the "Company") for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Michael J. Howerton, Acting Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
     or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.

                                                /s/ MICHAEL J. HOWERTON
                                          --------------------------------------
                                                   Michael J. Howerton
                                              Acting Chief Financial Officer

November 12, 2003

     This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Case 2:06-cv-00721-MHT-TFM Document 5 Filed 08/11/2006 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:06-cv-00721-MHT-TFM Document 5 Filed 08/11/2006 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:06-cv-00721-MHT-TFM Document 5 Filed 08/11/2006 Page 3 of 3
323.7000 Scope of subpart.

This subpart provides procedures for administering safety and health requirements.

Parent topic: PART 323 - ENVIRONMENT, ENERGY AND WATER EFFICIENCY, RENEWABLE

ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES, OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY, AND DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE
Exhibit
        32.2
 
 CERTIFICATION
        OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
        ACT
        OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
 
 
 In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of Simclar, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
        10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities
        and
        Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Marshall W. Griffin,
        Jr., Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary of the Company, hereby
        certify as of the date hereof, solely for purpose of Title 18, Chapter 63,
        Section 1350 of the United States Code, that to the best of my
        knowledge:
 
 (1)  The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 
 (2)  The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
 
 This
        Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, “filed” with the Securities
        and Exchange Commission.
 
 
 
 /s/
        Marshall W. Griffin, Jr.
 Marshall
        W. Griffin, Jr., Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary
 Simclar,
        Inc.
 November
        14, 2007
Exhibit
10.37


 


FIRST AMENDMENT


TO


THE TRAVELERS DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN


(As Amended and Restated Effective January 1, 2009)


 


The Travelers Deferred Compensation Plan (As Amended and Restated
Effective January 1, 2009) is hereby amended effective January 1,
2010 as follows:


 


I.


 


Section 2.2 is amended by restating subsection (n) to read as
follows:


 


(n)                                 For purposes of
applying a Deferral Election under this Plan, “Salary” does not include
long-term disability payments received from any source by the Participant.  Further, for purposes of applying a Deferral
Election under this Plan, in the case of a Participant who transfers during the
Plan Year to employment with a foreign affiliate of the Company or to work in a
foreign assignment for the Company or a U.S. affiliate of the Company, (i) “Salary”
does not include amounts paid to the Participant for services rendered for such
foreign affiliate after such transfer or during such foreign assignment, and (ii) “Incentive
Compensation” does not include that portion of the Incentive Compensation (as
otherwise determined) attributable to services rendered for such foreign
affiliate after such transfer or during such foreign assignment (for this
purpose, Incentive Compensation shall be deemed to be earned ratably over the
Plan Year or that portion of the Plan Year during which he/she is employed with
the Company or affiliate of the Company).


 


 


	
   

  	
  /s/ John P. Clifford Jr.

  
	
   

  	
  John P. Clifford Jr.

  
	
   

  	
  Executive Vice President — Human Resources

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Dated: December 21, 2009
#### New York Central Railroad Company, Appellant, v. Thomas D. Palella et al., Individually and Trading as Palella Brothers, Appellee.

Gen. No. 41,052.

*280O ’Connor, P. J., dissenting.

opinion filed July 2, 1940.

Sidney C. Murray, Frederick W. Flott and John B. Kneipple, for appellant; no appearance for appellee.

Opinion by

Justice McSurely.

“Not to be published in full.”
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR

THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

ANGELA PRICE, )

)

Plaintiff, )

v. ) CASE NO. 3:06-cv-742-MEF

)

ROANOKE CITY BOARD OF )

EDUCATION, )

)

Defendant. )

O R D E R

Upon consideration of the plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Amend (Doc. #9) filed on

March 26, 2007, it is hereby

ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED.

DONE this 11th day of April, 2007.

 /s/ Mark E. Fuller 

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-00742-MEF-WC Document 13 Filed 04/11/2007 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000764843
<NAME> SEDONA CORP
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
<CURRENCY> US DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           1,791
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       37
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,041
<PP&E>                                             825
<DEPRECIATION>                                     458
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              689
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      3,000
<COMMON>                                         (719)
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     3,024
<SALES>                                             23
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    23
<CGS>                                              167
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      167
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   770
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   8
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (922)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (922)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 (1,450)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                        (331)
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,703)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.12)



</TABLE>