alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of Federated Department Stores, Inc., Respondent, v. Emil M. Podeyn et al., Constituting the Board of Assessors of the County of Nassau, Appellants.

In a proceeding to review an assessment upon real property for taxation, the Board of Assessors of the County of Nassau appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered October 14, 1966, which denied so much of its motion for disclosure as sought production of statements of income and expenses and records of sales volume “ pertaining to the subject property.” Order affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements. Supplementing the opinion of the Special Term, to which we fully subscribe, we additionally note that we find no justifiable basis, in situations such as the one at bar, for the board’s suggestion that the rule in this 'State, which establishes reproduction cost less depreciation plus land value as a maximum predicate for an evaluation for tax assessment purposes, be discarded. Moreover, since the documents in question relate to the income, expenses and sales of a business conducted within the improvement and not to income attributable to the realty itself, they are limited in relevance to an inquiry whether the structural improvement is suitable to the site and whether the structural value of the subject building may be added to the value of the land *(People ex rel. Hotel Paramount Corp.*v. *Chambers,*298 N. Y. 372, mot. to amd. remittitur den. 298 N. Y. 919; *People ex rel. Lincoln, Inc.*v. *Boyland,*279 App. Div. 882, revd. on other grounds 306 N. Y. 817; *People ex rel. Hotel St. George Corp.*v. *Lilly,*45 N. Y. S. 2d 599, revd. on other grounds 268 App. Div. 830, revd. 293 N. Y. 898; 96 ALR 2d 680). As stated by the Special Term, petitioner in effect concedes the suitability of the improvement to the site and that its structural value may be added to the land value. Accordingly, the income produced in the operation of this “ specialty property ” is academic and irrelevant. Under the circumstances, the production of the documents and records in question would serve no constructive purpose and would only render ineffective petitioner’s professed policy not to publicize the income and sales of its individual stores, which policy, absent petitioner’s consent, should not be unnecessarily frustrated. Beldoek, P. J., Christ, Rabin, Benjamin and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur. [ 51 Misc 2d 555.]
Case 2:06-cv-00717-ID-SRW Document 34 Filed 04/18/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:06-cv-00717-ID-SRW Document 34 Filed 04/18/2007 Page 2 of 2
###### Editorial Note on Part 2

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

#### § 2.649 Partial decisions on limited work authorization.

The provisions of §§ 2.331, 2.339, 2.340(b), 2.343, 2.712, and 2.713 apply to any partial initial decision rendered in accordance with this subpart. Section 2.340(c) does not apply to any partial initial decision rendered in accordance with this subpart. A limited work authorization may not be issued under 10 CFR 50.10(d) without completion of the review for limited work authorizations required by subpart A of part 51 of this chapter. The authority of the Commission to review such a partial initial decision *sua sponte,* or to raise *sua sponte* an issue that has not been raised by the parties, will be exercised within the same time as in the case of a full decision relating to the issuance of a construction permit or combined license.
#### § 19.1 Purpose.

The regulations in this part establish requirements for notices, instructions, and reports by licensees and regulated entities to individuals participating in NRC-licensed and regulated activities and options available to these individuals in connection with Commission inspections of licensees and regulated entities, and to ascertain compliance with the provisions of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, titles II and IV of the Energy Reorganization Act of 1974, and regulations, orders, and licenses thereunder. The regulations in this part also establish the rights and responsibilities of the Commission and individuals during interviews compelled by subpoena as part of agency inspections or investigations under Section 161c of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, on any matter within the Commission's jurisdiction.

[72 FR 49483, Aug. 28, 2007]
52.231 [Reserved]

Parent topic: Subpart 52.2 - Text of Provisions and Clauses
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, EASTERN DIVISION

OWEN J. ROGAL, D.D.S., )

P.C. d/b/a THE PAIN CENTER, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

v. ) 3:06cv728-MHT

) 

SKILSTAF, INC., )

)

Defendant. )

ORDER

It is ORDERED that the motion to strike jury demand

(Doc. No. 68) is set for submission, without oral

argument, on August 22, 2007, with all briefs due by said

date.

DONE, this the 17th day of August, 2007.

 /s/ Myron H. Thompson 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-00728-MHT-WC Document 73 Filed 08/17/2007 Page 1 of 1
Subpart 2427.3 - Patent Rights Under

Government Contracts

Parent topic: PART 2427 - PATENTS, DATA, AND COPYRIGHTS

2427.305 Administration of patent rights clauses.

2427.305-2 Administration by the Government.

(b) Contractor reports. Contractors shall complete and submit to the Contracting Officer HUD Form

770, Report of Inventions and Subcontracts, upon receipt of said form. The Contracting Officer shall

send the form to those contractors whose contract work may have required the development of

inventions upon physical completion of the contract.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Drexel
Burnham Lambert Real Estate Associates III Second Quarter 10-QSB and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such 10-QSB filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0000761657
<NAME> DREXEL BURNHAM LAMBERT REAL ESTATE ASSOCIATES III
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                       3,620,296
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0<F1>
<PP&E>                                      33,209,780
<DEPRECIATION>                              14,679,207
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              23,058,999
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0<F1>
<BONDS>                                     15,595,362
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,479,154
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                23,058,999
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,415,375
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,882,864
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             743,227
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   532,511
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     8.80
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<FN>
<F1>Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000763098
<NAME> RESPONSE ONCOLOGY
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           7,857
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,894
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,602
<INVENTORY>                                      2,960
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                42,510
<PP&E>                                          17,071
<DEPRECIATION>                                  13,470
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 109,967
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           51,851
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                         17
<COMMON>                                           123
<OTHER-SE>                                      46,306
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   109,967
<SALES>                                         99,952
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                99,952
<CGS>                                           68,450
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  101,700
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   405
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,548
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,193)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (830)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,363)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,363)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.11)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 10.1
    

    
      

      


    

    
    	
          
            Executive Officer
          

        	
           
        	
          
            2009 Bonus
          

        	
           
        	
          
            2010 Base Salary1
          

        	
           
        	
          
            2010 Target Bonus
          

          
            (% of Base Salary)2
          

        
	
          
            Gustav A. Christensen
          

        	

        	
          $350,000
        	

        	
          $550,000
        	

        	
          50.0%
        
	
          
            President and Chief Executive Officer
          

        	

        	

        	

        	

        	

        	

        
	

        	

        	

        	

        	

        	

        	
           
        
	
          
            Ivana Magovcevic-Liebisch, Ph.D., J.D.
          

        	

        	
          $191,966
        	

        	
          $376,620
        	

        	
          37.5%
        
	
          
            Executive Vice President Corporate Development and General Counsel
          

        	

        	

        	

        	

        	

        	

        
	

        	

        	

        	

        	

        	

        	
           
        
	
          
            George Migausky
          

        	

        	
          $175,744
        	

        	
          $344,793
        	

        	
          37.5%
        
	
          
            Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
          

        	

        	

        	

        	

        	

        	

        
	

        	

        	

        	

        	

        	

        	
           
        
	
          
            William E. Pullman, M.D., Ph.D.
          

        	

        	
          $175,744
        	

        	
          $344,793
        	

        	
          37.5%
        
	
          
            Executive Vice President and Chief Development Officer
          

        	

        	

        	

        	

        	

        	

        


    

    
      

      

      


    

    


    

    	
          
            1 These base salaries were made retroactive to January
            1, 2010.
          

        
	
          
            2 The Compensation Committee has reserved to itself
            full discretion to determine the actual amount of each executive
            officer’s annual bonus, notwithstanding the target bonus amounts
            set by the committee in the first quarter of the year.
Case 2:06-cv-00748-MEF-WC Document 9 Filed 09/28/2006 Page 1 of 4
Case 2:06-cv-00748-MEF-WC Document 9 Filed 09/28/2006 Page 2 of 4
Case 2:06-cv-00748-MEF-WC Document 9 Filed 09/28/2006 Page 3 of 4
Case 2:06-cv-00748-MEF-WC Document 9 Filed 09/28/2006 Page 4 of 4
Case 2:06-cv-00748-MEF-WC Document 9-2 Filed 09/28/2006 Page 1 of 6
Case 2:06-cv-00748-MEF-WC Document 9-2 Filed 09/28/2006 Page 2 of 6
Case 2:06-cv-00748-MEF-WC Document 9-2 Filed 09/28/2006 Page 3 of 6
Case 2:06-cv-00748-MEF-WC Document 9-2 Filed 09/28/2006 Page 4 of 6
Case 2:06-cv-00748-MEF-WC Document 9-2 Filed 09/28/2006 Page 5 of 6
Case 2:06-cv-00748-MEF-WC Document 9-2 Filed 09/28/2006 Page 6 of 6
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                             5
<LEGEND>

This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from NATIONAL
PROPERTY  INVESTORS 8 2000 First Quarter 10-QSB and is qualified in its entirety
by reference to such 10-QSB filing.

</LEGEND>

<CIK>                                 0000763701
<NAME>                                NATIONAL PROPERTY INVESTORS 8
<MULTIPLIER>                                              1,000


<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                     DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                        JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                                      801
<SECURITIES>                                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                               100
<ALLOWANCES>                                                  0
<INVENTORY>                                                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                              0 <F1>
<PP&E>                                                   31,003
<DEPRECIATION>                                          (17,837)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                           14,439
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                         0 <F1>
<BONDS>                                                  10,770
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                         0
<PREFERRED>                                                   0
<COMMON>                                                      0
<OTHER-SE>                                                2,797
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                             14,439
<SALES>                                                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                          1,196
<CGS>                                                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                 0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                          1,169
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                          232
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                               0
<INCOME-TAX>                                                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                           0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                               0
<CHANGES>                                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                                 27
<EPS-BASIC>                                                0.60 <F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                 0
<FN>

<F1> Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet. <F2> Multiplier is 1.

</FN>


</TABLE>
1239.000 Scope of part.       In addition to FAR 39.000, this part prescribes acquisition policies and procedures for use in acquiring information technology and information technology-related supplies, services and systems, including information security, to include—          (a) Software management and development;          (b) Section 508 standards and compliance for contracts;          (c) Information security and incident response reporting;          (d) Protection of data about individuals;          (e) Cloud computing;          (f) Technology modernization and upgrade/refreshment; and          (g) Record management.    **Parent topic:** PART 1239—ACQUISITION OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
SUBCHAPTER A - GENERAL

PART 1900 [RESERVED]

PART 1901 - THE BROADCASTING BOARD OF GOVERNORS ACQUISITION

REGULATION SYSTEM

PART 1902 - DEFINITIONS OF WORDS AND TERMS

PART 1903 - IMPROPER BUSINESS PRACTICES AND PERSONAL CONFLICTS OF

INTEREST

PART 1904 - ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS

PART 1900 [RESERVED]

PART 1901 - THE BROADCASTING BOARD OF GOVERNORS ACQUISITION REGULATION

SYSTEM

1901.000 Scope of part.

Subpart 1901.1 - Purpose, Authority, Issuance

1901.101 Purpose.

1901.102 Authority.

1901.103 Applicability.

1901.104 Issuance.

1901.104-1 Publication and code arrangement.

1901.104-2 Arrangement of regulations.

Subpart 1901.4 - Deviations From the FAR

1901.403 Individual deviations.

1901.404 Class deviations.

Subpart 1901.6 - Contracting Authority and Responsibilities

1901.601 General.

1901.602 Contracting officers.

1901.602-1 Authority.

PART 1902 - DEFINITIONS OF WORDS AND TERMS

Subpart 1902.1 - Definitions

1902.101 Definitions.

PART 1903 - IMPROPER BUSINESS PRACTICES AND PERSONAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

Subpart 1903.6 - Contracts With Government Employees or Organizations Owned or

Controlled by Them

1903.602 Exceptions.

1903.670 Contracts between the Broadcasting Board of Governors and former

employees.

PART 1904 - ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS

Subpart 1904.70 - Procurement Requests

1904.7001 General.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

)

Plaintiff, )

v. ) CASE NO. 3:06-cv-761-MEF

)

MARIA del ROSARIO MORENO- )

VAZQUEZ, d/k/a Maria Coonley, )

)

Defendant. )

O R D E R

Upon consideration of the Motion to Withdraw as Attorney (Doc. #9) filed on

September 25, 2006, it is hereby

ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED.

DONE this the 28th day of September, 2006.

 /s/ Mark E. Fuller 

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-00761-CSC Document 10 Filed 09/28/2006 Page 1 of 1
###### Editorial Note on Part 2

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

#### § 2.325 Burden of proof.

Unless the presiding officer otherwise orders, the applicant or the proponent of an order has the burden of proof.
1825.003 Definitions.

Parent topic: PART 1825—FOREIGN ACQUISITION
Case 3:06-cr-00199-MEF-CSC Document 5 Filed 08/16/2006 Page 1 of 1
§ 917.122 Qualification requirements and nomination procedure for public members of Commodity Committees. ( a ) Public members shall not have a financial interest in or be associated with production, processing, financing, or marketing (except as consumers) of the commodities regulated under this part.
( b ) Public members should be able to devote sufficient time and express a willingness to attend committee activities regularly, and to familiarize themselves with the background and economics of the industry.
( c ) Public members must be residents of California.
( d ) Public members should be nominated by each Commodity Committee and should serve a two-year term which coincides with the term of office of grower members of Commodity Committees.
[42 FR 3625, Jan. 19, 1977, as amended at 43 FR 58355, Dec. 14, 1978] Effective Date Note
Effective Date Note: At 76 FR 66605, Oct. 27, 2011, § 917.122 was suspended indefinitely, effective Oct. 28, 2011.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

vs. ) Case No. 2:06CR205-WHA

)

SEBASTIAN K. SMITH, JR. )

PRETRIAL CONFERENCE ORDER

A pretrial conference was held on September 25, 2006 before the undersigned

Magistrate Judge. Present at this conference was the Honorable Donnie Bethel, counsel

for the defendant, and Assistant United States Attorney Christopher Snyder, counsel for

the government. As a result of the conference, it is

ORDERED as follows:

1. Jury selection is set for October 24, 2006. The trial of this case is set for the

trial term commencing on October 24, 2006 before Senior United States District Judge

W. Harold Albritton and is expected to last two (2) trial days.

2. There are no motions currently pending.

3. Proposed voir dire questions shall be filed on or before October 17, 2006.

Counsel should not include questions seeking information which is provided in the jury

questionnaire.

4. All Motions in Limine shall be filed on or before October 17, 2006. Motions in

Limine must be accompanied by a brief. Failure to file a brief will result in denial of the

motion.

Case 2:06-cr-00205-WHA-CSC Document 27 Filed 09/26/2006 Page 1 of 2
5. Proposed jury instructions shall be filed on or before October 17, 2006.

6. The court will not consider a plea pursuant to Rule 11(c) (1)(A) or (C) unless

notice is filed on or before noon on October 12, 2006. The government and defendant

are informed that if a defendant waits until the last minute to enter a plea, and if that plea,

for whatever reason, is not accepted by the court, the defendant and the government will

be expected to be prepared to go to trial on October 24, 2006. The court will not

continue the trial of this case as to any defendant because a defendant’s plea was not

accepted. In other words, the defendant and the government should not wait until the last

minute for a defendant to enter a guilty plea, and both the defendant and the government

should all be ready to go to trial on October 24, 2006, as to all defendants, even though a

particular guilty plea was not accepted by the court.

Done this 26 day of September, 2006. th

 /s/Charles S. Coody 

CHARLES S. COODY

CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:06-cr-00205-WHA-CSC Document 27 Filed 09/26/2006 Page 2 of 2