alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
March 10, 2014

Mr. Nick Harrington Aviation Safety Audit Specialists LLC 9850 S. Maryland Parkway, Suite A5362 Las Vegas, Nevada 89183

Dear Mr. Harrington:

This is in response to Aviation Safety Audit Specialist s , LLC July 30, 2013 letter sent to the public D ocket (No. FAA

- 2013

- 0727) petitioning the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on behalf of the Hualapai Tribe and the Grand Canyon Resort Corporation (HT&GCRC) to

amend Special Federal Aviation Regulation ( SFAR ) 50

- 2 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). That petition for rulemaking, if granted, would amend the regulation by changing the airspac e boundaries established by SFAR 50

- 2.

In accordance with 14 CFR § 11.73, the FAA must use the following criteria when making a

decision as to whether or not to amend current regulations based on a petition for rulemaking:

1) the immediacy of the safety or security concerns the petition raises; 2) the priority of other FAA issues; and 3) the resources available to address these issues.

Th e FAA appreciate s HT&GCRC ’s well

- constructed petition and the information provided.

Its petition asserts that the current boundaries do not take into account valleys near Grand Canyon West Airport, resulting in a “loophole” for part 91 and part 135 aircra ft to enter the Grand Canyon. It also explains that “incursions” by military and civilian aircraft create a potential for midair collision with highly trained and tested tour operators within the airspace, thereby, negating the coordination and safety pro cedures in use by the air tour community.
In sum, HT&GCRC contend s that the amendment would provide a greater level of safety to air tour operators and their passengers

.

The FAA has a priority list for rulemaking that addresses many issues crucial to the safety of the aviation community and the traveling public. The FAA must prioritize its limited rulemaking resources to provide the greatest safety benefit to the aviation system as a whole.2
W hile HT&GCRC’s petition for rulemaking appears to have meri t, we have determined that we do not have the resources necessary to proceed with rulemaking at this time. For this reason, we deny your petition to amend SFAR 50

- 2 in accordance with § 11.73. Although the FAA has decided to deny the request, your commen ts and reasons for a rule change will be considered if the agency undertakes future rulemaking in this area. Accor dingly, Docket

No. FAA

- 2013

- 0727 is being closed.

Sincerely,

/s/

Jodi L. Baker Deputy Assistant Manager, Air Transportation Divis ion3 Project No.: AFS

- 13

- 499

- P

Project Officer: _______________

ARM

- 101:KJones:9/20/2013:Doc#

ARM

- 1/100/104:Program Office AFS

- 200

MR NICK HARRINGTON

AVIATION SAFETY AUDIT SPECIALISTS LLC

9850 S MARYLAND PARKWAY SUITE A5362

LAS VEGAS NEVADA 89183
#### § 205.324 Form and style; number of copies.

All applicants shall file an original and two conformed copies of the application and all accompanying documents required under §§ 205.320 through 205.327.
Subpart 1812.3—Solicitation Provisions and Contract Clauses for the Acquisition of Commercial Products and Commercial Services    **Parent topic:** PART 1812—ACQUISITION OF COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS AND COMMERCIAL SERVICES1812.301 Solicitation provisions and contract clauses for the acquisition of Commercial Products and Commercial Services.       (f)(i) The following clauses are authorized for use in acquisitions of Commercial Products and Commercial Services when required by the clause prescription:                    (A)  			1852.204–75, Security Classification Requirements.          (B) 1852.204–76, Security Requirements for Unclassified Information Technology Resources.          (C) 1852.215–84, Ombudsman.          (D) 1852.216–80, Task Order Procedures (Alternate I).          (E) 1852.216–88, Performance Incentive.          (F) 1852.219–73, Small Business Subcontracting Plan.          (G) 1852.219–75, Individual Subcontracting Reports.          (H) 1852.223–70, Safety and Health.          (I) 1852.223–71, Frequency Authorization.          (J) 1852.223–72, Safety and Health (Short Form).          (K) 1852.223–73, Safety and Health Plan.          (L) 1852.223–75, Major Breach of Safety and Security (Alternate I).          (M) 1852.225–70, Export Licenses.          (N) 1852.228–76, Cross-Waiver of Liability for International Space Station Activities.          (O) 1852.228–78, Cross-Waiver of Liability for Science or Space Exploration Activities Unrelated to the International Space Station.          (P) 1852.237–70, Emergency Evacuation Procedures.          (Q) 1852.237–72, Access to Sensitive Information.          (R) 1852.237–73, Release of Sensitive Information.          (S) 1852.246–72, Material Inspection and Receiving Report.          (T) 1852.246–74, Counterfeit Electronic Part Detection and Avoidance.          (U) 1852.247.71, Protection of the Florida Manatee.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION

DONNA DORSEY DAVIS, etc., )

)

Plaintiff, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

v. ) 2:06cv766-MHT

) 

RICHARD M. DORSEY, etc., )

and CD&O, L.L.C., etc., )

)

Defendants. )

ORDER

It is ORDERED that the motion to extend discovery

deadline (doc. no. 25) is denied for the following

reasons.

“A request or motion for extension of a deadline in

any court order ... must indicate that movant has, in a

timely manner, previously contacted counsel for all other

parties; and ..., based on that contact, must state

whether counsel for all other parties agree to or oppose

the extension request or motion,” and “[a] request or

motion that fails to meet this requirement will be denied

Case 2:06-cv-00766-MHT-TFM Document 26 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 1 of 2
outright, unless the movant offers a credible explanation

in the request or motion why this requirement has not

been met.” Scheduling Order (doc. no. 13), § 9(B).

Movant here has failed to comply with these requirements.

Moreover, “[a]bsent stated unforeseen and unavoidable

circumstances beyond the control of the movant, ...

‘eleventh hour’ extension requests and motions will be

denied outright.” Id. The movant has failed to offer any

explanation as to why this motion was filed the day

before the deadline to complete discovery in this case,

rather than days, or even weeks, in advance. 

DONE, this the 2nd day of April, 2007.

 /s/ Myron H. Thompson 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00766-MHT-TFM Document 26 Filed 04/02/2007 Page 2 of 2
§ 993.81 Assessments. ( a ) Each handler shall pay to the committee, upon demand, with respect to all salable prunes handled by him as the first handler thereof, his pro rata share of all expenses which the Secretary finds are reasonable and likely to be incurred by the committee during each crop year. Each handler's pro rata share shall be the rate of assessment per ton fixed by the Secretary. At any time during or after a crop year the Secretary may increase the rate of assessment to cover unanticipated expenses of the committee or a deficit in assessable tonnage.
( b ) In order to provide funds to carry out the functions of the committee, the committee may accept advance payments from any handler to be credited toward such assessments as may be levied pursuant to this section against the respective handler.
( c ) Any money collected as assessments during any crop year and not expended in connection with the committee's operations may be used by the committee for a period of five months subsequent to such crop year. At the end of such period the committee shall, from funds on hand, refund or credit to handler accounts the aforesaid excess. Each handler's share of such excess funds shall be the amount of assessments he has paid in excess of his pro rata share of the actual net expenses of the committee for the preceding crop year. Any money collected from assessments hereunder and remaining unexpended in the possession of the committee at the termination of this part, shall be distributed in such manner as the Secretary may direct: *Provided,* That to the extent practical, such funds shall be returned pro rata to the persons from whom such funds were collected.
[26 FR 476, Jan. 19, 1961, as amended at 30 FR 9800, Aug. 6, 1965]
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION

J.B., a minor child, by and )

through his next friend, )

Addie Ward, on behalf of )

himself and all others )

similarly situated, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

v. ) 2:06cv755-MHT

) 

WALTER WOOD, in his )

individual capacity, )

)

Defendant. )

J.B., a minor child, by and )

through his next friend, )

Addie Ward, on behalf of )

himself and all others )

similarly situated, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

v. ) 2:06cv908-MHT

) 

WALTER WOOD, in his )

individual capacity, )

)

Defendant. )

Case 2:06-cv-00755-MHT-CSC Document 34 Filed 06/18/2007 Page 1 of 2
ORDER

It is ORDERED as follows:

(1) The motion for extension of time (Doc. No. 33)

is granted.

(2) The motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 29) is

reset for submission, without oral argument, on

July 9, 2007, with any opposing brief and

evidentiary materials due by said date.

DONE, this the 18th day of June, 2007.

 /s/ Myron H. Thompson 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00755-MHT-CSC Document 34 Filed 06/18/2007 Page 2 of 2
§ 212.78 Tertiary incentive crude oil. *Annual prepaid expenses report.* By January 31 of each year after 1980, the project operator with respect to any enhanced oil recovery project for which a report had been filed previously with DOE pursuant to paragraph (h)(2)(i) of this section as that paragraph was in effect on January 27, 1981, shall file with DOE a report in which the operator shall certify to DOE ( a ) which of the expenses that had been reported previously to DOE pursuant to paragraph (h)(2)(i) of this section as that paragraph was in effect on January 27, 1981, were prepaid expenses;
( b ) the goods or services for which such expenses had been incurred and paid;
( c ) the dates on which such goods or services are intended to be used;
( d ) the dates on which such goods or services actually are used;
( e ) the identity of each qualified producer to which such prepaid expenses had been attributed; and
( f ) the percentage of such prepaid expenses attributed to each such qualified producer. An operator shall file an annual prepaid expenses report each year until it has reported the actual use of all the goods and services for which a prepaid expense had been incurred and paid. For purposes of this paragraph, a prepaid expense is an expense for any injectant or fuel used after September 30, 1981, or an expense for any other item to the extent that IRS would allocate the deductions (including depreciation) for that item to the period after September 30, 1981.
(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under OMB Control No.: 1903-0069) [46 FR 43654, Aug. 31, 1981, as amended at 46 FR 63209, Dec. 31, 1981]
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

ALMA T. McBROOM, )

)

Plaintiff, )

v. ) CASE NO. 2:06-cv-767-MEF

)

VANESSA GORDON, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

O R D E R

Upon consideration of the plaintiff's Motion for Continuance (Doc. #49) filed on

March 21, 2007, it is hereby

ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED. The plaintiff shall file a response to the

defendant's motion for summary judgment which shall include a brief and any evidentiary

materials on or before May 21, 2007. The defendant may file a reply brief on or before May

29, 2007.

DONE this 22nd day of March, 2007.

 /s/ Mark E. Fuller 

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00767-MEF-SRW Document 51 Filed 03/22/2007 Page 1 of 1
#### Wells *et al. v.*DuBose, receiver.

June 17, 1913.

Complaint. Before Judge Walker. Wilkes superior court. February *7,*1912.

*W. A. Slaton,*for plaintiffs in error.

Eish, C. J.

1. “The liability of persons who organize a corporation and transact business in its name, before the minimum capital stock has been subscribed for, is to creditors, and is not an asset of the corporation; and under the ruling in the ease of *John V. Farwell Co.*v. *Jackson Stores,*137 *Ga.*174 (73 S. E. 13), the receiver of the corporation could not maintain a suit against persons falling within the provisions of § 2220 of . the Civil Code, to collect from them, as an asset of the corporation, an amount necessary to pay the outstanding debts of the corporation.” *Rigbers*v. *Hathcock,*138 *Ga.*120 (74 S. E. 834).

2. Applying the ruling above announced to the facts of this case, the court erred in not sustaining the general demurrer to the petition.

*Judgment reversed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications

  I, William Augustin IV, certify that:

  1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K/A and all reports on Form 10-D
     required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report
     on Form 10-K/A of Structured Asset Mortgage Investments II Trust
     2006-AR8 (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

  2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
     whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
     to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
     light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
     misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

  3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
     information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
     covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic
     reports;

  4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the
     servicers and based on my knowledge and the compliance reviews
     conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statements required in
     this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed
     in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled
     their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects;
     and

  5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing
     criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation
     reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
     asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in
     accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules
     13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report,
     except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances
     of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in
     this report on Form 10-K/A.

     In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
     information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:
     Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP as Servicer, EMC Mortgage Corporation
     as Servicer and Washington Mutual Bank, as Servicer.

     Dated: July 10, 2008

     /s/ William Augustin IV
     Signature

     Vice President
    (senior officer in charge of the servicing function of the master servicer)
#### § 983.90 Procedure upon termination.

Upon the termination of this part, the members of the committee then functioning shall continue as joint trustees, for the purpose of liquidating the affairs of the committee. Action by such trustees shall require the concurrence of a majority of said trustees. Such trustees shall continue in such capacity until discharged by the Secretary, and shall account for all receipts and disbursements and deliver all property on hand, together with all books and records of the committee and the joint trustees, to such persons as the Secretary may direct; and shall upon the request of the Secretary, execute such assignments or other instruments necessary or appropriate to vest in such person full title and right to all the funds, properties, and claims vested in the committee or the joint trustees, pursuant to this part. Any person to whom funds, property, or claims have been transferred or delivered by the committee or the joint trustees, pursuant to this section, shall be subject to the same obligations imposed upon the members of said committee and upon said joint trustees.

[69 FR 17850, Apr. 4, 2002. Redesignated at 74 FR 56540, Nov. 2, 2009]
IV 

109TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 1090 

Honoring the life of Ruth Brown and her copyright royalty reform efforts 

on behalf of rhythm and blues recording artists. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 5, 2006 

Mr. CONYERS (for himself, Mr. SENSENBRENNER, Mr. RANGEL, Mr. NADLER, 

Ms. LEE, and Mr. SCOTT of Virginia) submitted the following resolution; 

which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

RESOLUTION 

Honoring the life of Ruth Brown and her copyright royalty 

reform efforts on behalf of rhythm and blues recording 

artists. 

Whereas Ruth Brown passed away on November 17, 2006; 

Whereas Ruth Brown, a rhythm and blues singer and songwriter known as Miss Rhythm, was one of Atlantic 

Records’ first recording and performing stars; 

Whereas Ruth Brown’s elegant voice made her a hit from the 

1940s onward with such songs as ‘‘So Long’’ and ‘‘Teardrops from My Eyes’’; 

Whereas Ruth Brown’s career spanned the post-World War 

II era through the Civil Rights Movement to the 21st 

century, a period which also saw the genre of ‘‘race’’ 

music move into the American mainstream; 


cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
2 

•HRES 1090 IH 

Whereas Ruth Brown helped found the Rhythm and Blues 

Foundation in 1988 to recognize, promote, and preserve 

rhythm and blues music; 

Whereas Ruth Brown worked with Congress to advance the 

cause of copyright royalty reform so that rhythm and 

blues artists could receive deserved copyright royalties 

from their music; 

Whereas Ruth Brown’s talent was recognized with a Tony 

Award for Best Actress in a Musical in ‘‘Black and 

Blue’’ in 1989, a Grammy Award for her album ‘‘Blues 

on Broadway’’ in 1989, induction into the Rock and Roll 

Hall of Fame in 1993, and a Lifetime Achievement 

Award from the Blues Foundation in 1999; 

Whereas Ruth Brown’s autobiography, ‘‘Miss Rhythm’’, received the Ralph J. Gleason Music Book Award; and 

Whereas Ruth Brown is survived by 2 sons, 4 siblings, 3 

grandchildren, and a multitude of cousins, nieces, nephews, friends, and admirers: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) honors the life of Ruth Brown; 

3 (2) recognizes Ruth Brown for her efforts to4 ward reforming the copyright royalty system on be5 half of rhythm and blues recording artists; 

6 (3) commends Ruth Brown for her success in 

7 ensuring that rhythm and blues recording artists 

8 would receive deserved copyright royalties; and 


cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
3 

HRES 1090 IH 

1 (4) expresses its deepest condolences to Ruth 

2 Brown’s family and friends. 

Æ 


cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with BILLS
# Subpart 1512.1 - Special Requirements for the Acquisition of Commercial Items

**Parent topic:**PART 1512 - ACQUISITION OF COMMERCIAL ITEMS

## 1512.101 Unenforceability of unauthorized obligations.

EPA deviates from FAR 52.212-4 by using the term *Commercial Supplier Agreements* (defined in 1502.100) for commercial contracts instead of *supplier license agreements*. Paragraph (u) of clause 1552.332-39 (FAR DEVIATION) prevents violations of the *Anti-Deficiency Act* (31 U.S.C. 1341) for the acquisition of supplies or services subject to a Commercial Supplier Agreement.   

## 1512.1070 Contract clause.

EPA deviates from FAR 52.212-4 by revising paragraphs (s) and (u) and adding paragraph (w). Contracting officers shall use clause 1552.332-39, *Contract Terms and Conditions-Commercial Items* (FAR DEVIATION), for acquisitions of commercial items in lieu of 52.212-4 or 52.212-4 Alternate I. The contracting officer may tailor this clause in accordance with FAR 12.302.
In The Matter Of: 

SERVED: January 10, 2017 

DEPARTMENT OF 

TRANSPORTATION 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC lUll JAN 1 0 p 3: 2b 

DOCKET OPERATIONS 

Docket No. FAA-2015-0643 

Mach One Air Charters, Inc. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No. 2014WP210018 

Respondent 

ORDER SETTING PREHEARING CONFERENCE 

On December 2, 2016, the undersigned judge issued a Notice of Hearing, setting the hearing 

to begin on March 21, 2017. 

Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. § 13.205(a)(l) and (7), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 

1. The parties shall appear by telephone for a prehearing conference with the undersigned 

judge on March 6, 2017 at 2pm Eastern time. 

2. The parties shall access the conference by dialing telephone number 888-204-5984 and 

then inputting access code 6392406 when prompted. 

3. During the conference, the parties shall be prepared to discuss their witness and exhibit 

lists, the issues in dispute, the status of any settlement negotiations, and any other related 

matters. 

Attachment: Service List 

2_/----

DOUGLAS M. RA WALD 

Administrative Law Judge 
SERVICE LIST - BY U.S. MAIL 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W10001 

Steven L. Graff, Respondent's Counsel 

Steven L. Graff, Inc. 

43399 Calle De Velardo 

Temecula, CA 92592 

TEL: 951-303-6400 

FAX: 951-303-0723 

Lisa Toscano, Complainant's Counsel 

Enforcement Division, Western Team 

Federal Aviation Administration 

P. 0. Box 92007 

Los Angeles, CA 90009-2007 

TEL: 310-725-7110 

FAX: 310-725-6816 

ONE COPY 

The Honorable Douglas M. Rawald, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-5121 Staff Assistant 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

Docket No. FAA-2015-0643 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building___:.Suite 2WIOOO, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.