alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Each of the undersigned in connection with this Annual report of Health
Insurance Innovations, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the annual period ended December 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the undersigneds knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operation of the Company.

Date: April 1, 2013



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ Michael W. Kosloske              
|MICHAEL W. KOSLOSKE                  
|PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
|(Principal Executive Officer)        

Date: April 1, 2013



|                                                
|------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Michael D. Hershberger                      
|MICHAEL D. HERSHBERGER                          
|CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER, TREASURER AND SECRETARY
|(Principal Financial Officer)                   

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Health Insurance Innovations, Inc. and will
be retained by Health Insurance Innovations, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Subpart 814.4 [Reserved]

Parent topic: PART 814 - SEALED BIDDING
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

 )

 v. ) CR. NO. 1:06-mj-70-DRB

 )

OSCAR MARTINEZ-RAMIREZ )

UNITED STATES’ NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF ADDITIONAL COUNSEL

Comes now the United States of America, by and through Leura Garrett Canary, United

States Attorney for the Middle District of Alabama, and hereby notices the appearance of Assistant

United States Attorney A. Clark Morris, who will be serving as additional counsel of record for the

United States in this matter. 

 Respectfully submitted this the 28th of July, 2006.

LEURA GARRETT CANARY

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

/s/ A. Clark Morris

A. CLARK MORRIS

Assistant United States Attorney

One Court Square, Suite 201

Montgomery, AL 36104

Phone: (334)223-7280

Fax: (334)223-7135

E-mail: clark.morris@usdoj.gov

Case 1:06-cr-00201-WHA-CSC Document 3 Filed 07/28/2006 Page 1 of 1
§ 765.404 Transfer of security to and assumption of debt by ineligible applicants. Cross Reference
Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 65043 , Aug. 8, 2024.
( a ) *General.* ( 1 ) The Agency will allow the transfer of real estate and chattel security property to applicants who are ineligible for the type of loan being assumed only on Non-program loan rates and terms.
( 2 ) The Agency will reclassify the assumed loan as a Non-program loan.
( b ) *Eligibility.* Transferees must: ( 1 ) Provide written documentation verifying their credit worthiness and debt repayment ability;
( 2 ) Not have received debt forgiveness from the Agency;
( 3 ) Not be ineligible for loans as a result of a conviction for controlled substances according to 7 CFR part 718; and
( 4 ) Not be ineligible due to disqualification resulting from Federal crop insurance violation according to 7 CFR part 718.
( c ) *Assumption amount.* The transferee must assume the total outstanding FLP debt or if the value of the property is less than the entire amount of debt, an amount equal to the market value of the security less any prior liens. The total outstanding FLP debt will include any unpaid deferred interest that accrued on the loan to the extent that the debt does not exceed the security's market value.
( d ) *Downpayment.* Non-program transferees must make a downpayment to the Agency of not less than 10 percent of the lesser of the market value or unpaid debt.
( e ) *Interest rate.* The interest rate will be the Non-program interest rate in effect at the time of loan approval.
( f ) *Loan terms.* ( 1 ) For a Non-program loan secured by real estate, the Agency schedules repayment in 25 years or less, based on the applicant's repayment ability.
( 2 ) For a Non-program loan secured by chattel property only, the Agency schedules repayment in 5 years or less, based on the applicant's repayment ability.
COURTROOM DEPUTY MINUTES DATE : NOVEMBER 13, 2006

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA DIGITAL RECORDED: 1:11 p.m. to 1:12 p.m.

PRETRIAL CONFERENCE 

PRESIDING MAG. JUDGE: CHARLES S. COODY DEPUTY CLERK: WANDA STINSON 

CASE NUMBER: 2:06CR202-WKW-CSC DEFENDANT NAME: EUGENE CLECKLER 

 KIM CLECKLER

 APPEARANCES

GOVERNMENT DEFENDANT COUNSEL

ATTY. ANDREW SCHIFF ATTY. RONALD BRUSON; GEORGE 

 BECK; TERRIE BIGGS

/ DISCOVERY STATUS: Complete.

_________________________________________________________________________________________

 _________________________________________________________________________________________

/ PENDING MOTION STATUS: Motion to Dismiss; Motion to Exclude or in the alternative,

Motion in Limine;

 PLEA STATUS: 

__________________________________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________________________________

/ TRIAL STATUS: Will take 3-4 days to try case if goes to trial.

_________________________________________________________________________________________

/ REMARKS: Willl take motions under advisement when Govt’s response is filed;

__________________________________________________________________________________________

Case 2:06-cr-00202-WKW-CSC Document 44 Filed 11/13/2006 Page 1 of 1
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

**In the Matter of**

**RUDOLPH S. HOUCK, III**

**PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT FROM INACTIVE STATUS**  **: :**  **: :**  **: :**  **: No. 20 DB 2016 (No. 35 RST 2016)** 

**Attorney Registration No. 15999** 

**(Allegheny County)**

O R D E R

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 16 th**  **day of May, 2016, the Report and Recommendation of Disciplinary Board Member dated May 5, 2016, is approve**  **d and it is ORDERED that Rudolph S. Houck, who has been on Inactive Status, has ne**  **ver been suspended or disbarred, and has demonstrated that he has the moral**  **qualifications, competency and learning in law required for admission to practice in**  **the Commonwealth, shall be and is, hereby reinstated to active status as a member of the Ba**  **r of this Commonwealth. The expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and**  **processing of this matter shall be paid by the Petitioner.**
Case 2:06-cv-00766-MHT-TFM Document 7 Filed 09/26/2006 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:06-cv-00766-MHT-TFM Document 7 Filed 09/26/2006 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>


        

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS OF REALMARK PROPERTY INVESTORS LIMITED  PARTNERSHIP IV FOR
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1996, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1996
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  191,284
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,718,591
<PP&E>                                      32,126,731      
<DEPRECIATION>                              13,536,974
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              20,308,348      
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,329,929
<BONDS>                                     19,919,450
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                20,308,348
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,773,273
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,246,982
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             923,495
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (453,897)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (453,897)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (18.84)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                

        

</TABLE>
842.000 Scope of part.       This part prescribes policies and procedures for contract administration and audit services for all Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) contracting activities.    **Parent topic:** PART 842 - CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION AND AUDIT SERVICES
Exhibit 32








Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350


(Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)





Securities and Exchange Commission


100 F Street, N.E.


Washington, D.C. 20549





In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Gulf Coast Ultra Deep Royalty Trust (the “Trust”) for the year ended December 31, 2018, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, not in its individual capacity but solely as the trustee of the Trust, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of its knowledge:





(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition, distributable income and changes in trust corpus of the Trust.











Date: March 21, 2019





/s/ Michael J. Ulrich


Michael J. Ulrich


Vice President


The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A.,


as Trustee of Gulf Coast Ultra Deep Royalty Trust











The above certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-K or as a separate disclosure document.
EXHIBIT
10.36








Overview
of Compensation Arrangements for Preston D. Swafford Effective as of July 1,
2009





Effective
as of July 1, 2009, Tom Kilgore approved the following compensation arrangements
for Preston D. Swafford:





·
            A
      base salary of $525,000


·
            Executive
      Annual Incentive Plan opportunity of 80 percent of salary beginning with
      fiscal year 2009


·
            Executive
      Long-Term Incentive Plan opportunity of 100 percent of salary beginning
      with the performance cycle ending on September 30,
  2009





In
addition, Mr. Kilgore approved a performance arrangement that will provide Mr.
Swafford, as long as he remains responsible for managing and directing TVA’s
Nuclear Power Group, the opportunity to receive annual performance awards for
improvements in the overall performance of any of TVA’s nuclear plants based on
nuclear power industry peer evaluations.  Under the arrangement, Mr.
Swafford will receive a lump-sum performance award of $100,000 following each
fiscal year that at least one nuclear plant in TVA’s generation portfolio
achieves an improved performance evaluation.  In the event the
performance of any plant drops below that achieved in the most recent evaluation
of the plant, no award will be made.  Mr. Swafford is eligible to
receive these annual performance awards based on evaluations completed in 2010
and beyond.  All awards will be recommended by the Chief Operating
Officer and approved by the CEO at the end of each fiscal year.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

M IDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABA M A

OFFICE OF THE CLERK

POST OFFICE BOX 711

MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA 36101-0711

DEBRA P. HACKETT, CLERK

TELEPHONE (334) 954-3600

August 30, 2006

 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT

To: All Counsel of Record

Re: J. B. v. Wood 

Civil Action No.2:06-cv-00755-CSC

The above-styled case has been reassigned to Judge W. Harold Albritton, III.

Please note that the case number is now 2:06-cv-00755-WHA. This new case number

should be used on all future correspondence and pleadings in this action.

 

Case 2:06-cv-00755-MHT-CSC Document 3 Filed 08/29/2006 Page 1 of 1
#### § 25.7 Interpretations.

Except as specifically authorized by the Commission in writing, no interpretation of the meaning of the regulations in this part by any officer or employee of the Commission other than a written interpretation by the General Counsel will be recognized to be binding upon the Commission.
# SUBCHAPTER D - SOCIOECONOMIC PROGRAMS

- PART 1019 - SMALL BUSINESS PROGRAMS 
- PART 1022 - MINORITY AND WOMEN INCLUSION 

- PART 1019 - SMALL BUSINESS PROGRAMS    - Subpart 1019.2 - Policies     - 1019.202   Specific policies.
    - 1019.202-70   The Treasury Mentor Protégé Program.
  - Subpart 1019.8 - Contracting With the Small Business Administration (The 8(a) Program)     - 1019.81   Preparing the contracts.
    - 1019.811-3   Contract clauses.
- PART 1022 - MINORITY AND WOMEN INCLUSION    - Subpart 1022.70 - Fair inclusion of minorities and women     - 1022.7000   Contract clause.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Office of the Secretary

                    The following Applications for Certificates of Public Convenience and Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier Permits were filed under Subpart B (formerly Subpart Q) of the Department of Transportation's Procedural Regulations (                    *See*14 CFR 301.201*et seq.*). The due date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motions To Modify Scope are set forth below for each application. Following the Answer period DOT may process the application by expedited procedures. Such procedures may consist of the adoption of a show-cause order, a tentative order, or in appropriate cases a final order without further proceedings.                

*Docket Number:*                     DOT-OST-2008-0043 and DOT-OST-2010-0283.                

*Date Filed:*                     November 15, 2010.                

*Due Date for Answers, Conforming Applications, or Motion To Modify Scope:*                     December 6, 2010.                

*Description:*                     Joint application of Iberia Líneas Aéreas de España, S.A. (“Iberia”) and Iberia's wholly owned subsidiary Iberia Líneas Aéreas de España Sociedad Anónima Operadora (“Iberia Operadora”) requesting the transfer of Iberia's foreign air carrier permit to Iberia Operadora effective immediately upon completion of the Iberia-British Airways consolidation; and transfer of related authorizations is also requested.                

Renee V. Wright,

Program Manager, Docket Operations, Federal Register Liaison. 

[FR Doc. 2010-31713 Filed 12-16-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P
Exhibit 13.2

Certification by the Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Constellium N.V. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2014
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Didier Fontaine, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: April 24, 2015



|    |  |                     |  |                        
|--- |  | ------------------- |  | -----------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Didier Fontaine
|    |  | Name:               |  | Didier Fontaine        
|    |  | Title:              |  | Chief Financial Officer
###### Editorial Note on Part 2

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

#### § 2.806 Commission action.

The Commission will incorporate in the notice of adoption of a regulation a concise general statement of its basis and purpose, and will cause the notice and regulation to be published in the Federal Register or served upon affected persons.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

vs. ) CASE NO. 2:06CR198-WKW

)

RONALD MCQUEEN )

ORDER

For good cause it is 

ORDERED that the deadlines for filing proposed voir dire, jury instructions and

motions in limine in the above-case now set for December 27, 2007 be and are hereby

RESET for December 28, 2006.

Done this 17 day of November, 2006. th

 /s/Charles S. Coody 

CHARLES S. COODY

CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:06-cr-00198-WKW-CSC Document 34 Filed 11/17/2006 Page 1 of 1
-1- 

STATE OF MICHIGAN 

COURT OF APPEALS 

AFFILIATED MEDICAL OF DEARBORN, 

 Plaintiff-Appellee, 

UNPUBLISHED 

December 23, 2014 

v No. 314179 

Wayne Circuit Court 

LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, LC No. 11-012755-NF 

 Defendant-Appellant. 

Before: O’CONNELL, P.J., and BORRELLO and GLEICHER, JJ. 

O’CONNELL, P.J. (dissenting). 

 I respectfully dissent. The question in this case is whether the circuit court had 

jurisdiction to enter a default judgment of $30,781.93. I would conclude that it does and affirm. 

 Plaintiff, Affiliated Medical of Dearborn (Affiliated Medical) filed suit in the circuit 

court and averred in its complaint that the amount in controversy in this case was over $25,000. 

Later, in a motion for default judgment, Affiliated Medical alleged that defendant Liberty Mutual 

Insurance Company (Liberty Mutual) owed it $20,500 for services rendered, $7,645.68 in 

attorney fees, and interest and other costs. The trial court entered a default judgment of 

$30,781.93, which included interest and attorney fees. 

“A court’s subject-matter jurisdiction is determined only by reference to the allegations 

listed in the complaint.” Neal v Oakwood Hosp Corp, 226 Mich App 701, 707; 575 NW2d 68 

(1997). “Jurisdictional allegations are not viewed in hindsight.” Peters v Gunnell, Inc, 253 

Mich App 211, 224 n 10; 655 NW2d 582 (2002). Further, the circuit court should not transfer a 

case to the district court unless it appears to a legal certainty that the amount in controversy is 

less than $25,000. Etefia v Credit Technologies, Inc, 245 Mich App 466, 474-475; 628 NW2d 

577 (2001); Supreme Court Administrative Order 1998-1. 

I cannot conclude that the circuit court should have transferred this case to the district 

court. I cannot conclude that the circuit court could not have determined with legal certainty that 

Affiliated Medical’s claims in their complaint totaled less than $25,000 solely on the basis that 

they asked for only $20,500 of actual damages when filing their motion for a default judgment. 

Subject matter jurisdiction exists on the basis of what a plaintiff has a basis to believe is in the 

amount in controversy when they file their complaint, not on the basis of the amount the plaintiff 

actually receives. Voiding a judgment simply because the plaintiffs later asked for less than they 
-2- 

asserted was in controversy in the complaint is the equivalent of asking plaintiffs to predict the 

future. 

Further, while the general rule is that costs and attorney fees are not considered part of an 

amount in controversy, when a statute expressly provides for attorney fees, those fees may be 

considered part of the amount in controversy. See Id. MCL 500.3148(1) provides that an 

attorney is entitled to fees as “a charge against the insurer in addition to the benefits recovered” 

for an improper denial of benefits. Therefore, I cannot conclude that the circuit court should 

have determined to a legal certainty that the amount in controversy here was certainly under 

$25,000. 

For these reasons, I would affirm. 

/s/ Peter D. O’Connell
1813.003 Policy. (NASA supplements paragraph (g))       (g) Acquisitions under these simplified acquisition procedures shall be fixed-price, except as provided under the unpriced purchase order method in FAR 13.302–2.    **Parent topic:** PART 1813—SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION PROCEDURES
§ 429.34 Torchieres. ( a ) *Sampling plan for selection of units for testing.* ( 1 ) The requirements of § 429.11 are applicable to torchieres; and
( 2 ) Reserved
( b ) *Certification reports.* ( 1 ) The requirements of § 429.12 are applicable to torchieres; and
( 2 ) Pursuant to § 429.12(b)(13), a certification report shall include the following additional product-specific information: A declaration that the basic model meets the applicable design requirement and the features that have been incorporated into the torchiere to meet the applicable design requirement (*e.g.,* circuit breaker, fuse, ballast).
Federal Depository Library ProgramPersistent URL Home Page      

# Target for /GPO/LPS77532 lost

The target resource for this PURL can no longer be traced. The following is a list of the targets this PURL was previously assigned to.

Powered by the Federal Depository Library Program.                A service of the U.S. Government Publishing Office.