alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000760436
<NAME> MAI SYSTEMS CORP
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           4,086
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   21,581
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (4,311)
<INVENTORY>                                      3,856
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                31,827
<PP&E>                                          14,063
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (9,759)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  51,337
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           38,445
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            91
<OTHER-SE>                                       4,620
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    51,337
<SALES>                                         16,824
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                16,824
<CGS>                                           10,781
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   10,781
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,046
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 1,087
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 136
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,205)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,205)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,205)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.14)
        

</TABLE>
SUBCHAPTER G - CONTRACT

MANAGEMENT

PART 2942 - CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION AND AUDIT SERVICES

PART 2943 - CONTRACT MODIFICATIONS

PART 2944 - SUBCONTRACTING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES

PART 2945 - GOVERNMENT PROPERTY

PARTS 2946-2951 [RESERVED]

PART 2942 - CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION AND AUDIT SERVICES

Subpart 2942.1 - Contract Audit Services

2942.101 Policy.

Subpart 2942.15 - Contractor Performance Information

2942.1501 Scope.

2942.1502 Policy.

2942.1503 Procedures.

PART 2943 - CONTRACT MODIFICATIONS

Subpart 2943.2 - Change Orders

2943.205 Contract clauses.

Subpart 2943.3 - Forms

2943.301 Use of forms.

PART 2944 - SUBCONTRACTING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES

Subpart 2944.1 - General

2944.101 Waiver.

Subpart 2944.2 - Consent To Subcontract

2944.201-1 Consent requirements.

2944.202 Contracting officer's evaluation.

2944.202-2 Considerations.

2944.203 Consent limitations.

Subpart 2944.3 - Contractors' Purchasing Systems Reviews

2944.302 Requirements.

PART 2945 - GOVERNMENT PROPERTY

Subpart 2945.1 - General

2945.104 Review and correction of contractors' property control systems.

2945.105 Records of Government property.

Subpart 2945.3 - Providing Government Property to Contractors

2945.302 Providing facilities.

Subpart 2945.4 - Contractor Use and Rental of Government Property

2945.403 Rental-use and charges clause.

PARTS 2946-2951 [RESERVED]
#### § 1040.89-11 Remedial action by recipients.

Where the Director, Office of Civil Rights and Diversity, finds a recipient has discriminated on the basis of age, the recipient shall take such remedial action as the Director, OEO, may require to end the discrminatory practice or policy and/or to overcome the effects of the discrimination.

[50 FR 8089, Feb. 27, 1985, as amended at 68 FR 51348, Aug. 26, 2003]
**I am joining Alaska Airlines in its effort to provide convenient service from Portland to our nation's**

**capital.** Docket No. DOT- OST - 2012 - 0029 Dear Secretary LaHood: I am writing in support of the application of Alaska Airlines, Inc. to provide a daily direct flight to Reagan National Airport (DCA) from Portland International Airport (PDX). I believe that Alaska is the right choice. With their large Portland hub presence, strong customer service focus and track record for operational reliability, the carrier is best suited to provide a nonstop PDX to DCA flight. Portland is the second largest market to the Washington DC area without nonstop service to DCA. With a nonstop route from PDX to DCA, Oregon and S.W. Washington residents will no longer b e forced to use more time - consuming and less convenient service to our nation's capital. I respectfully urge you to grant Alaska Airlines' application to serve PDX - DCA. Karen Conley Conley98001@gmail.com
IV 

House Calendar No. 52 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 330 

[Report No. 109–140] 

Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 10) proposing 

an amendment to the Constitution of the United States authorizing 

the Congress to prohibit the physical desecration of the flag of the 

United States. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 20, 2005 

Mr. GINGREY, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; 

which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 

10) proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the 

United States authorizing the Congress to prohibit the 

physical desecration of the flag of the United States. 

1 Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution 

2 it shall be in order without intervention of any point of 

3 order to consider in the House the joint resolution (H.J. 

4 Res. 10) proposing an amendment to the Constitution of 

5 the United States authorizing the Congress to prohibit the 
2 

HRES 330 RH 

1 physical desecration of the flag of the United States. The 

2 joint resolution shall be considered as read. The previous 

3 question shall be considered as ordered on the joint resolu4 tion and on any amendment thereto to final passage with5 out intervening motion except: (1) two hours of debate on 

6 the joint resolution equally divided and controlled by the 

7 chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee 

8 on the Judiciary; (2) the amendment in the nature of a 

9 substitute printed in the report of the Committee on Rules 

10 accompanying this resolution, if offered by Representative 

11 Watt of North Carolina or his designee, which shall be 

12 in order without intervention of any point of order, shall 

13 be considered as read, and shall be separately debatable 

14 for one hour equally divided and controlled by the pro15 ponent and an opponent; and (3) one motion to recommit 

16 with or without instructions. 

17 SEC. 2. During consideration of H.J. Res. 10 pursu18 ant to this resolution, notwithstanding the operation of the 

19 previous question, the Chair may postpone further consid20 eration of the joint resolution to a time designated by the 

21 Speaker. 

House Calendar No. 52 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 330 

[Report No. 109–140] 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the joint resolution 

the flag of the United States. Congress to prohibit the physical desecration of Constitution of the United States authorizing the (H.J. Res. 10) proposing an amendment to the 

JUNE 20, 2005 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed
Subpart 1903.6 - Contracts With Government

Employees or Organizations Owned or

Controlled by Them

Parent topic: PART 1903 - IMPROPER BUSINESS PRACTICES AND PERSONAL CONFLICTS OF

INTEREST

1903.602 Exceptions.

To avoid potential conflicts of interest or the appearance of preferential treatment, it is the

Broadcasting Board of Governors policy not to award contracts, purchase orders, grants or

cooperative agreements to Government employees or their family members or business concerns

owned or controlled by Government employees or their family members. Exceptions to this policy

must be approved by the Board Director or Board Procurement Executive and supported by written

Findings and Determination. A contract with an employee for services may result in violation of the

dual salary compensation statutes (5 U.S.C. 5533). Nothing in this paragraph is intended to render

inapplicable the conflict of interest prohibition set out in 18 U.S.C. 208.

1903.670 Contracts between the Broadcasting Board of

Governors and former employees.

To avoid conflicts of interest or the appearance of preferential treatment, purchase orders,

contracts, grants or cooperative agreements with former employees of the Broadcasting Board of

Governors, or with firms in which former employees or their family members are known to have

controlling interest, may be entered into within two years following separation from employment

only with the written approval of the Board Director. A written justification shall be made a part of

the file. The justification must address the issue of conflict of interest and conclude that it does not

exist; or that in spite of its existence, the Board's ability to meet its mission would be seriously

harmed without the award.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

JOHN DAVID TORRES

,

Appellant,

v.

THE ST ATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 19

- 00209

- CR

Appeal from the

County Criminal Court No. 4

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 20180C01479 )

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. This decision shall be certified

below for observ ance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 4TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2021.

GINA M. PALAFOX, Justice

Before Rodriguez, C.J., Palafox, and Alley, JJ.

Alley, J ., concurring
exv10whwi








Exhibit 10.h(i)




AMENDMENT TO THE AMENDED AND RESTATED

MASCO CORPORATION RETIREMENT BENEFIT RESTORATION PLAN

(effective January 1, 1995, as amended and restated effective October 22, 2008)




     Pursuant to authority granted to the undersigned by the Organization and Compensation
Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors, and to the Company’s power to amend the subject Plan
reserved in the Plan’s Section 7.1, the Plan is hereby amended, effective as of the date upon which
this Amendment is executed, as follows:



          1) the following sentence is added to Section 1.2: “Notwithstanding the foregoing, effective
as of January 1, 2010 the defined benefit Qualified Pension Plans set forth on Appendix A are
amended to provide that all credited service and salary accruals in such plans are frozen as of
January 1, 2010; consequently, no provision of this Plan shall be interpreted to provide for
accrual of any defined benefit pension hereunder with respect to any period following
January 1, 2010, and all defined benefit pension accruals under this Plan are to be frozen as of
January 1, 2010.”



          2) the last sentence of Section 3.1 is amended by adding the following provision: “,
and there shall be no defined benefit pension accruals under subsection 3.1(a) with respect to any
period following January 1, 2010, or otherwise, and all defined benefit pension accruals under
this Plan are frozen as of January 1, 2010.”


Signed this 16th day of November, 2009.




	 	 	 	 	 
	 	MASCO CORPORATION



 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ John G. Sznewajs
 	 
	 	 	John G. Sznewajs 	 
	 
	 	Its:	   Vice President, Treasurer and

Chief Financial Officer
**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Simclar, Inc, (the “Company”) on Form
      10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Barry J. Pardon,
      President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




/s/
                Barry J. PardonBarry
                J. Pardon, PresidentSimclar,
                Inc.November
                17, 2008
Editorial Note on Part 2
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

§ 2.1020 Entry upon land for inspection. ( a ) Any party, potential party, or interested governmental participant may serve on any other party, potential party, or interested governmental participant a request to permit entry upon designated land or other property in the possession or control of the party, potential party, or interested governmental participant upon whom the request is served for the purpose of access to raw data, inspection and measuring, surveying, photographing, testing, or sampling the property or any designated object or operation thereon, within the scope of § 2.1018 of this subpart.
( b ) The request may be served on any party, potential party, or interested governmental participant without leave of the Commission or the Presiding Officer.
( c ) The request shall describe with reasonable particularity the land or other property to be inspected either by individual item or by category. The request shall specify a reasonable time, place, and manner of making the inspection and performing the related acts.
( d ) The party, potential party, or interested governmental participant upon whom the request is served shall serve on the party, potential party, or interested governmental participant submitting the request a written response within ten days after the service of the request. The response shall state, with respect to each item or category, that inspection and related activities will be permitted as requested, unless the request is objected to, in which case the reasons for objection shall be stated. If objection is made to part of an item or category, the part shall be specified.
[54 FR 14944, Apr. 14, 1989, as amended at 56 FR 7797, Feb. 26, 1991]
Exhibit 13.1

Certification by the Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Constellium N.V. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2013
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Pierre Vareille, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: April 22, 2014



|    |  |                     |  |                        
|--- |  | ------------------- |  | -----------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Pierre Vareille
|    |  | Name:               |  | Pierre Vareille        
|    |  | Title:              |  | Chief Executive Officer
#### CHAPMAN, Respondent, v. GLOBE MALLEABLE IRON & STEEL CO., Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department.

May 27, 1914.)

Action by Fred B. Chapman against the Globe Malleable Iron & Steel Company.

PER CURIAM.

Judgment and order reversed, and new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide event. *Held,*that the verdict is contrary to and against the weight of the evidence on the questions of defendant’s negligence and plaintiff’s freedom from contributory negligence,

KRUSE, P. J., dissents.
# Subpart 843.2 - Change Orders

**Parent topic:**PART 843 - CONTRACT MODIFICATIONS

## 843.205 Contract clauses.

As authorized in the introductory text of clauses FAR 52.243-1, Changes - Fixed-Price; FAR 52.243-2, Changes - Cost-Reimbursement; and FAR 52.243-4, Changes, and in the prescription at FAR 43.205(c) for FAR 52.243-3, Changes - Time-and-Materials or Labor-Hours, the contracting officer may vary the period within which a contractor must assert its right to an equitable adjustment but the extended period shall not exceed 60 calendar days.   

## 843.205-70 Contract changes - supplement.

The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 852.243-70, Construction Contract Changes - Supplement, in solicitations and contracts for construction that are expected to exceed the micro-purchase threshold for construction.
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 242 (Friday, December 17, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 78999]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-31781]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention


Disease, Disability, and Injury Prevention and Control Special 
Emphasis Panel (SEP): Maternal Vitamin D Status and Preterm Birth, 
DP11-002, Initial Review

    In accordance with Section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463), the Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention (CDC) announces the aforementioned meeting:

    Time and Date: 11 a.m.-5 p.m., April 1, 2011 (Closed).
    Place: Teleconference.
    Status: The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance 
with provisions set forth in section 552b(c)(4) and (6), Title 5 
U.S.C., and the Determination of the Director, Management Analysis 
and Services Office, CDC, pursuant to Public Law 92-463.
    Matters To Be Discussed: The meeting will include the initial 
review, discussion, and evaluation of ``Maternal Vitamin D Status 
and Preterm Birth, DP11-002, initial review.''
    Contact Person for More Information: Donald Blackman, PhD, 
Scientific Review Officer, CDC, National Center for Chronic Disease 
Prevention and Health Promotion, Office of the Director, Extramural 
Research Program Office, 4770 Buford Highway, NE., Mailstop K-92, 
Atlanta, GA 30341, Telephone: (770) 488-3023, E-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6e2a2c37592e0d0a0d40090118"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="fcb8bea5cbbc9f989fd29b938a">[email protected]</span></a>.
    The Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, has been 
delegated the authority to sign Federal Register notices pertaining 
to announcements of meetings and other committee management 
activities, for both the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 
and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.

    Dated: December 13, 2010.
Elaine L. Baker,
Director, Management Analysis and Services Office, Centers for Disease 
Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2010-31781 Filed 12-16-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 08-4667

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

 v. 

JEFFREY S. SHIFLER, 

 Defendant - Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge. 

(1:06-cr-00320-JFM-1) 

Submitted: September 15, 2009 Decided: October 6, 2009 

Before KING, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. 

Dismissed in part; affirmed in part by unpublished per curiam 

opinion. 

John L. Machado, LAW OFFICE OF JOHN MACHADO, Washington, D.C., 

for Appellant. Paul Michael Cunningham, Assistant United States 

Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
PER CURIAM: 

 Jeffrey S. Shifler pled guilty pursuant to a written 

plea agreement to interference with attendance at public schools 

and interference with housing, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 

§ 245(b)(2)(A); 42 U.S.C. § 3631(a) (2006), and he was sentenced 

to fifty-one months’ imprisonment. Appellate counsel filed a 

brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), in 

which he asserts there are no meritorious issues for appeal. 

Shifler was notified of his right to file a pro se supplemental 

brief, but he has not done so. The Government moves to dismiss 

the appeal, asserting Shifler waived his appellate rights in the 

plea agreement. 

Upon review of the plea agreement and the transcript 

of the Fed. R. Crim. P. 11 hearing, we conclude that Shifler 

knowingly and voluntarily waived his right to appeal his 

sentence. Further, because counsel did not raise any sentencing 

issues outside the scope of the waiver, and we discern none, the 

terms of the agreement will be enforced. Accordingly, we grant 

the Government’s motion to dismiss as to Shifler’s sentence. 

However, because the appeal waiver pertains only to Shifler’s 

sentence, we have reviewed the convictions pursuant to our 

obligation under Anders. As we have found no meritorious issues 

for appeal, we affirm Shifler’s convictions. 

2 
3 

This court requires that counsel inform his client, in 

writing, of his right to petition the Supreme Court of the 

United States for further review. If the client requests that a 

petition be filed, but counsel believes that such a petition 

would be frivolous, then counsel may move this court for leave 

to withdraw from representation. Counsel’s motion must state 

that a copy thereof was served on the client. We dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before the court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED IN PART;

AFFIRMED IN PART
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS OF NATIONAL PROPERTIES INVESTMENT TRUST AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                          24,356
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   18,963
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                72,885
<PP&E>                                       1,653,391
<DEPRECIATION>                                 670,439
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,055,837
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           77,882
<BONDS>                                        564,234
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                     443,681
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,055,837
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                87,016
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   62,477
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                23,547
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              14,579
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,101
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,101
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,101
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00
        

</TABLE>