alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                     DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                        JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                          JUN-28-1998
<CASH>                                   16,194
<SECURITIES>                              1,271
<RECEIVABLES>                             6,764
<ALLOWANCES>                               (714)
<INVENTORY>                                 707
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                         25,383
<PP&E>                                   19,812
<DEPRECIATION>                          (19,021)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           25,664
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    23,332   
<BONDS>                                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0 
<PREFERRED>                                   0 
<COMMON>                                    674
<OTHER-SE>                                2,658
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             26,664
<SALES>                                   3,369
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          9,603
<CGS>                                     1,699
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             5,801
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            305
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              0 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          472         
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          22,870
<INCOME-TAX>                                108
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      22,978
<DISCONTINUED>                                0         
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0         
<CHANGES>                                     0         
<NET-INCOME>                             22,978
<EPS-PRIMARY>                              0.34
<EPS-DILUTED>                              0.34
        


</TABLE>
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, SOUTHERN DIVISION

CHRISTINE BENNETT, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

v. ) 1:06cv723-MHT

) 

ARMY FLEET SUPPORT LLC, )

)

Defendant. )

ORDER

It is ORDERED that the motion for leave to amend

complaint (doc. no. 9) is granted. The court assumes

that defendant has no objection to the allowance of the

amendment; however, if it does, it must file the

objection within seven days from the date of this order.

DONE, this the 27th day of September, 2006.

 /s/ Myron H. Thompson 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:06-cv-00723-MHT-CSC Document 15 Filed 09/27/2006 Page 1 of 1
#### § 205.350 General purpose.

The purpose of this rule is to establish a procedure for the Office of International Affairs and Energy Emergencies (IE) to obtain current information regarding emergency situations on the electric energy supply systems in the United States so that appropriate Federal emergency response measures can be implemented in a timely and effective manner. The data also may be utilized in developing legislative recommendations and reports to the Congress.

(Approved by the Office of Management and Budget under control number 1901-0288)
# 2823.704 Electronic products environmental assessment tool.

The HCA or designee is the agency head for the purposes of executing the written determination not to purchase EPEAT®-registered products.     

**Parent topic:**Subpart 2823.7 - Contracting for Environmentally Preferable Products and Services
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

OFFICE OF THE CLERK

POST OFFICE BOX 711

MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA 36101-0711

DEBRA P. HACKETT, CLERK TELEPHONE (334) 954-3600 

 

 NOTICE OF ERROR

To: Counsel of Record

Case Style: Mildred W. Anderson et al v. Pactiv Corporation et al (MEMBER CASE) 

Case Number: 2:06-cv-00739-LES

Referenced Docket Entry - *** Motion to Dismiss; Brief in Support & Answer to complaint - Docs.

Nos. 12, 13, & 14

The referenced docket entries were filed electronically with ERROR on ***December 22, 2006*** 

and are being STRICKEN from the docket. This resulted in an error on the docket sheet because these

documents should have been filed in lead case 06cv83 ONLY. Please DISREGARD these docket entries.

 

 

 

Case 2:06-cv-00739-LES-CSC Document 15 Filed 12/27/2006 Page 1 of 2
2

 

 

Case 2:06-cv-00739-LES-CSC Document 15 Filed 12/27/2006 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 35.3

SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

American Express Centurion Bank

American Express Issuance Trust II

Reporting Period January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2015

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer
of American Express Centurion Bank (AECB), a wholly-owned subsidiary of American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc. (TRS), pursuant to the Amended and Restated Supplemental Servicing Agreement, dated as of March
12, 2013, among TRS, AECB, American Express Bank, FSB, and American Express Receivables Financing Corporation VIII LLC (as amended from time to time, the Agreement), does hereby certify that:

1. AECB performs certain servicing procedures on behalf of TRS under the Agreement.

2. The undersigned is duly authorized to execute and deliver this Certificate.

3. A review
of AECBs activities during the reporting period and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under my supervision.

4. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, AECB has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects
throughout the reporting period.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 28thday of March, 2016.



|                                |  |                                         
|------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------
|AMERICAN EXPRESS CENTURION BANK
|                                | 
|By:                             |  | /s/ Denise D. Roberts                   
|Name:                           |  | Denise D. Roberts                       
|Title:                          |  | Chief Financial Officer                 
|                                | 
|By:                             |  | /s/ Brady P. Bagley                     
|Name:                           |  | Brady P. Bagley                         
|Title:                          |  | Vice President  Controller, U S Banking
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

vs. ) Case No. 2:06CR200-WHA

)

ROSA A. RINCON )

PRETRIAL CONFERENCE ORDER

A pretrial conference was held on September 25, 2006 before the undersigned

Magistrate Judge. Present at this conference was the Honorable Jay Lewis counsel for the

defendant, and Assistant United States Attorney Terry Moorer, counsel for the

government. As a result of the conference, it is

ORDERED as follows:

1. Jury selection is set for October 24, 2006. The trial of this case is set for the

trial term commencing on October 24, 2006 before Senior United States District Judge

W. Harold Albritton and is expected to last two (2) trial days.

2. The following motions are currently pending: Defendant’s First Motion in

Limine; Defendant’s Motion to Sever; Defendant’s Second Motion in Limine; Defendant’s

Third Motion in Limine.

3. Proposed voir dire questions shall be filed on or before October 17, 2006.

Counsel should not include questions seeking information which is provided in the jury

questionnaire.

4. All Motions in Limine shall be filed on or before October 17, 2006. Motions in

Case 2:06-cr-00200-WHA-CSC Document 56 Filed 09/26/2006 Page 1 of 2
Limine must be accompanied by a brief. Failure to file a brief will result in denial of the

motion.

5. Proposed jury instructions shall be filed on or before October 17, 2006.

6. The court will not consider a plea pursuant to Rule 11(c) (1)(A) or (C) unless

notice is filed on or before noon on October 12, 2006. The government and defendant

are informed that if a defendant waits until the last minute to enter a plea, and if that plea,

for whatever reason, is not accepted by the court, the defendant and the government will

be expected to be prepared to go to trial on October 24, 2006. The court will not

continue the trial of this case as to any defendant because a defendant’s plea was not

accepted. In other words, the defendant and the government should not wait until the last

minute for a defendant to enter a guilty plea, and both the defendant and the government

should all be ready to go to trial on October 24, 2006, as to all defendants, even though a

particular guilty plea was not accepted by the court.

Done this 26 day of September, 2006. th

 /s/Charles S. Coody 

CHARLES S. COODY

CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:06-cr-00200-WHA-CSC Document 56 Filed 09/26/2006 Page 2 of 2
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-7030

MAMADOU BAILO DIALLO, Petitioner - Appellant,

versus MELANIE PERREIRA, Director of Howard County Detention Center; CALVIN MCCORMICK, District Director of Homeland Security and bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement; DOUGLAS RIPPE, Supervisor of DHS/BICE Field Detention of Baltimore, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (8:07-cv-00348-AW) Submitted: December 19, 2007 Decided: January 8, 2008 Before NIEMEYER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Mamadou Bailo Diallo, Appellant Pro Se. George William Maugans, III, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Mamadou Bailo Diallo appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Diallo v. Perreira , No. 8:07-cv-00348-AW (D. Md. June 29, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-50835

Summary Calendar

__________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

GREG HALL,

 Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. MO-95-CR-21-1

- - - - - - - - - -

July 31, 1996

Before DAVIS, EMILIO M. GARZA and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Greg Hall appeals his conviction of distribution of cocaine

base. He contends solely that his guilty plea is invalid because

the district court violated Fed. R. Crim. P. 11(c)(1). The

district court's error in advising Hall that he faced four years

of supervised release when he really faced five was harmless

error inasmuch as the sentence of which he was warned was

substantially greater than that which he received. See United
No. 95-50835

-2-

States v. Pierce, 5 F.3d 791, 793-94 (5th Cir. 1993). Likewise,

the district court's failure to advise Hall of all the

consequences of violating his term of supervised release cannot

be considered a material factor which affected his decision to

plead guilty. See United States v. Johnson, 1 F.3d 296, 302 (5th

Cir. 1993) (en banc).

AFFIRMED.
1

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

V. ) CR. No.: 2:06cr206-MHT

)

ALETHIA ADRIANNE SCOTT )

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

COMES NOW the undersigned counsel, Kevin L. Butler, and enters his appearance on

behalf of Defendant, ALETHIA ADRIANNE SCOTT, in the above-styled case.

Dated this 21 day of August 2006. st

Respectfully submitted,

s/ Kevin L. Butler

KEVIN L. BUTLER

First Assistant Federal Defender

201 Monroe Street, Suite 407

Montgomery, Alabama 36104

Phone: (334) 834-2099

Fax: (334) 834-0353

E-mail: kevin_butler@fd.org

AZ Bar Code: 014138

Case 2:06-cr-00206-MHT-CSC Document 8 Filed 08/21/2006 Page 1 of 2
2

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

V. ) CR. No.: 2:06cr206-MHT

)

ALETHIA ADRIANNE SCOTT )

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on August 21, 2006, I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk

of Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing to the following: 

Chris Snyder, Esquire

Assistant United States Attorney

One Court Square, Suite 201

Montgomery, Alabama 36104

Respectfully submitted,

s/ Kevin L. Butler

KEVIN L. BUTLER

First Assistant Federal Defender

201 Monroe Street, Suite 407

Montgomery, Alabama 36104

Phone: (334) 834-2099

Fax: (334) 834-0353

E-mail: kevin_butler@fd.org

AZ Bar Code: 014138

Case 2:06-cr-00206-MHT-CSC Document 8 Filed 08/21/2006 Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.2
                                                                    ------------

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
             Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
                    ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


In connection with the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the
Quarterly Report of SEDONA Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the
period ending September 30, 2003 (the "Report"), I, Anita M. Primo, Interim
Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my
knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
             15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
             material respects, the financial condition and results of
             operations of the Company.

/s/Anita M. Primo
-------------------------------------------
Anita M. Primo
Controller and Interim Chief Financial Officer



November 14, 2003





                                       23
**EXHIBIT 35.1**

** **

**World Omni Financial Corp.**

**Servicer Compliance Statement**

**Pursuant to Item 1123**

**of Regulation AB**

** **

I, William J. Shope,do hereby certify that I am the Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of World Omni Financial Corp., a Florida corporation,and further certify on behalf of World Omni Financial Corp. in its capacity as servicer (the “Servicer”) under theSale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of October 24, 2012 (the “Agreement”), among World Omni Auto Receivables Trust2012-B, as Issuing Entity, World Omni Auto Receivables LLC, as Depositor, and the Servicer, as follows:

 

(i)          Areview of the activities of the Servicer during the period covered by the issuing entity’s Annual Report on form 10-K forthe fiscal year ended December 31, 2015 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance under the Agreement, has beenmade under my supervision.

 

(ii)         Tothe best of my knowledge, based on the review described above, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreementin all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereuntoset my hand as of March 11, 2016.
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATION**I, Mark N. Schroeder, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Patriot Coal Corporation (“theregistrant”);  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;(b) [Reserved](c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and(d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Dated:March 14, 2008                     /s/ Mark N. Schroeder   Mark N. Schroeder   Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY

ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Eye Care centers of America, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 29, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Douglas C. Shepard, as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                  |  |                                                                         |  |  |  | 
|----------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------- |  |  |  | 
|November 12, 2007 |  | /s/ Douglas C. Shepard                                                  |  | 
|                  |  | Douglas C. Shepard Executive Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer |  | 

A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO EYE CARE CENTERS OF
AMERICA, INC. AND WILL BE RETAINED BY EYE CARE CENTERS OF AMERICA, INC. AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3306 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3306

   To suspend temporarily the duty on lightweight wide angle digital 
                             camera lenses.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 26, 2006

  Mr. Schumer (for himself and Mrs. Clinton) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To suspend temporarily the duty on lightweight wide angle digital 
                             camera lenses.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIGHTWEIGHT WIDE ANGLE DIGITAL CAMERA LENSES.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

      

``      9902.11.02        Lightweight lenses for  Free      No change       No change       On or before 12/
                           digital cameras with                                              31/2009          ''
                           fixed focal length of                                                               .
                           10.5 mm and not
                           exceeding 10.6 oz. in
                           weight (provided for
                           in subheading
                           9002.11.90)..........

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```