alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Code of Ethics for Financial Executives



 TOYZAP.COM, INC. 
 2010 Code of Ethics for Financial Executives 
 The
Financial Executive of Toyzap.com, Inc. (the “Company”) shall adhere to and advocate the following principles and responsibilities governing their professional and ethical conduct: 
 1. Act with honesty and integrity, avoiding actual or apparent conflicts of interest in personal and professional relationships. 

2. Provide information that is accurate, complete, objective, relevant, timely and understandable. 
 3. Comply with rules and regulations of federal, state, provincial and local governments, and other appropriate private and public
regulatory agencies. 
 4. Act in good faith, responsibly, with due care, competence and diligence, without misrepresenting
material facts or allowing independent judgement to be subordinated. 
 5. Respect the confidentiality of information acquired
in the course of the Financial Executive’s work except when authorized or otherwise legally obligated to disclose. Confidential information acquired in the course of the Financial Executive’s work will not be used for personal advantage.

 6. Share knowledge and maintain skills important and relevant to the needs of the Company. 
 7. Proactively promote ethical behavior as a responsible partner among peers in the Financial Executive’s work environment. 

8. Achieve responsible use of and control over all assets and resources employed or entrusted to the Financial Executive. 
 CERTIFICATION 
 I certify that: 
 1. I have read and understand the Company’s Code of Ethics for Financial Executives.

 2. I will comply with the Code of Ethics for Financial Executives for as long as I am a Financial Executive. 
  

			
	  

	Financial Executive
		
	Date:
#### § 33.1 Purpose and scope.

This part prescribes requirements for the issuance of specific licenses of broad scope for byproduct material (“broad licenses”) and certain regulations governing holders of such licenses. The provisions and requirements of this part are in addition to, and not in substitution for, other requirements of this chapter. In particular, the provisions of parts 30 and 37 of this chapter apply to applications and licenses subject to this part.

[78 FR 17006, Mar. 19, 2013]
#### Bertha Warren, Respondent, v. New York City Transit Authority, Appellant, et al., Defendants.

Order entered October 27, 1969, insofar as appealed from reversed on the law without costs and without disbursements, and the motion for a protective order granted. Following an accident in the subway defendant’s motorman obtained the names of two eyewitnesses which he gave to a police officer at the scene, and the names appear on the police blotter. Some time thereafter a senior claims examiner from defendant’s law department interviewed these witnesses and obtained their statements. The affidavit of defendant’s attorney shows that these statements were taken purely for the purpose of defending the anticipated litigation, and nothing to contradict this highly probable fact is shown, Defendant has made available for discovery the reports of its own employees concerning the accident. Plaintiff seeks discovery of the statements from witnesses and defendant seeks a protective order in regard to them. It is quite clear that statements taken from witnesses to prepare for litigation are attorney’s work product and protected *(Reese*v. *Long Is. R. R. Co.,*24 A D 2d 581; *Rios*v. *Donovan,*21 A D 2d 409). It is immaterial that the statements may have been taken prior to actual institution of the action *(Finegold*v. *Lewis,*22 A D 447; *Albano*v. *Schwab Bros. Trucking,*27 A D 2d 901). Extending the exceptions Which exist in the case of reports obtained for purposes other than litigation *(Kandel*v. *Tocher,*22 A D 2d 513) would serve to make the statute meaningless (see *Reese*v. *Long Is. R. R. Co,, supra).*Concur — Stevens, P. J., Markewich and Steuer, JJ.; McGivern and Nunez, JJ., dissent in the following memorandum by McGivern, J.: The pretrial disclosure sought herein is warranted. The plaintiff, struck by a subway train, has suffered amputations. The information sought was obtained at the scene and almost immediately after the accident When the plaintiff was still in a dire and helpless condition. The statements obtained were taken in the regular course of business and thus not solely as a precursor of *750litigation. The plaintiff’s attorney attests he has sought to interview the same subject witnesses, but in vain. There are other reasons: Firstly, the circumstances of this case are within the favoring exceptions of *“*injustice and hardship” in the statute. (CPLR 3101 [subd. d]; 3 Weinstein-Korn-Miller, N. Y. Civ. Prac., par. 3101.54.) Secondly, the cases support the plaintiff’s position. (See *Bloom*v. *New York City Tr. Auth.,*20 A D 2d 687; *Matter of Fox*v. *City of New York,*28 A D 2d 20.) Lastly, the trend towards the fullest pretrial disclosure is in accord with the plaintiff’s request. (CPLR 104; *Allen*v. *Crowell-Collier Pub. Co.,*21 N Y 2d 403.)
Case 2:06-cv-00746-WHA Document 15 Filed 12/19/2006 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:06-cv-00746-WHA Document 15 Filed 12/19/2006 Page 2 of 2
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Amended Quarterly Report of Universal Detection
Technology (the "Registrant") on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ending March 31,
2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Jacques Tizabi, Principal Executive Officer and Acting
Principal Financial Officer of the Registrant, certify to the best of my
knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)       The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Registrant.



                                            /s/ Jacques Tizabi
                                            ------------------------
Dated:  May 20, 2008                       Jacques Tizabi
                                            Principal Executive Officer and
                                            Acting Principal Financial Officer
                                            and Principal Accounting Officer
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

CALVIN FLUKER, RICARDO

WRIGHT, BERYL JACKSON,

TRACEY MARTIN, LISA

PITCHFORD, KIMBERLY LOVE,

RESHANDA BROWN,

PLAINTIFFS,

v.

U.S. FOODSERVICE, INC. and

U.S. FOODSERVICE, INC. -

MONTGOMERY DIVISION,

Defendants.

)

)

)

)

)

) CIVIL ACTION NO.:

)

) 2:06cv785-MHT

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

NOTICE OF FILING RULE 68 OFFER OF JUDGMENT AND

ACCEPTANCE

COMES NOW the plaintiff, Reshanda Brown, by and through her

attorney, and hereby gives notice of filing the defendant's attached Rule 68

Offer of Judgment in the amount of $5,000.00, inclusive of attorneys' fees

and all costs and expenses accrued. The Plaintiff accepts the defendant's

offer of judgment.

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Plaintiff respectfully

requests that this Honorable Court enter judgment in this cause in favor of

Case 2:06-cv-00785-MHT-WC Document 62 Filed 02/04/2008 Page 1 of 2
2

Plaintiff Reshanda Brown and against the Defendant U.S. Foodservice,

Inc. in the amount of five thousand dollars ($5,000.00).

Respectfully submitted,

s/ Ethan R. Dettling

Jon C. Goldfarb

Ethan R. Dettling

Counsel for Plaintiff

OF COUNSEL:

WIGGINS, CHILDS, QUINN & PANTAZIS, LLC

The Kress Building

301 19

th Street North

Birmingham, AL 35203

Telephone No.: (205) 314-0500

Facsimile No.: (205) 254-1500

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I do hereby certify that I have on February 4, 2008, filed the foregoing

with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send

notification of such filing to the following:

Tammy L. Baker, Esq.

Jackson Lewis, LLP

First Commercial Bank Building

800 Shades Creek Parkway Suite 870

Birmingham, Alabama 35209

Facsimile No.: (205)332-3131

s/Ethan R. Dettling

OF COUNSEL

Case 2:06-cv-00785-MHT-WC Document 62 Filed 02/04/2008 Page 2 of 2
Case 2:06-cv-00785-MHT-WC Document 62-2 Filed 02/04/2008 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:06-cv-00785-MHT-WC Document 62-2 Filed 02/04/2008 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:06-cr-00201-WHA-CSC Document 6 Filed 07/28/2006 Page 1 of 1
Subpart 744.2—Consent to Subcontracts

Parent topic: PART 744—SUBCONTRACTING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES

744.202-170 Partner vetting.

If an acquisition is identified as subject to partner vetting, see (48 CFR) AIDAR 704.70 for the

applicable procedures and requirements.
H. Res. 239

In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

April 27, 2005.

Resolved, That the election contest relating to the office

of Representative from the Sixth Congressional District of

Tennessee is dismissed.

Attest:

Clerk.
###### Editorial Note on Part 1045

#### Editorial Notes:Nomenclature changes to part 1045 appear at 88 FR 41294, June 26, 2023, and 88 FR 82238, Nov. 24, 2023.

§ 1045.190 How does the public submit an MDR for DOE classified matter?

Editorial Notes:

Nomenclature changes to part 1045 appear at 88 FR 41294, June 26, 2023, and 88 FR 82238, Nov. 24, 2023.

(a) DOE matter marked as containing NSI, RD, FRD, or TFNI is subject to review for declassification by DOE if the request for a declassification review describes the matter containing the information with sufficient specificity to enable DOE to locate it with a reasonable amount of effort.

(b) The request must be sent to the Director, Office of Classification, EHSS-60/Germantown Building, U.S. Department of Energy, 1000 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20585.

[83 FR 66007, Dec. 21, 2018, as amended at 88 FR 41295, June 26, 2023]
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION

BERYL JACKSON, TRACEY )

MARTIN, LISA PITCHFORD, )

and KIMBERLY LOVE, )

)

Plaintiffs, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

v. ) 2:06cv785-MHT

) 

U.S. FOODSERVICE, INC., )

and U.S. FOODSERVICE, INC.- )

Montgomery Division, )

)

Defendants. )

ORDER

It is ORDERED that the motion for leave to file

motion under seal (Doc. No. 75) is granted. 

DONE, this the 2nd day of April, 2008.

 /s/ Myron H. Thompson 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00785-MHT-WC Document 76 Filed 04/02/2008 Page 1 of 1
Amendment 2009-1 Profit Sharing Plan



 EXHIBIT 10.19 
 AMENDMENT 2009-1 
 MERCURY GENERAL CORPORATION 

 PROFIT SHARING PLAN 
 WHEREAS, Mercury General Corporation (the “Company”) maintains the Mercury General Corporation Profit Sharing Plan (the “Plan”); and 
 WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 9.1 of the Plan, the Company is authorized to amend the Plan; and 
 WHEREAS, the Company deems it necessary, and in the best interests of the Plan and the Company, to amend the Plan to reflect
a suspension of Employer Matching Contributions under the Plan effective April 1, 2009. Such suspension shall not apply to any Participant who is (as determined by the Company) employed by Auto Insurance Specialists, LLC, AIS Management, LLC,
or Poliseek AIS Insurance Solutions, Inc. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is amended, effective as of the dates
specified below, as follows: 
  

	 	 1.
	 Effective as of April 1, 2009, Section 3.3 of the Plan is hereby amended by adding a new subsection (c) to read as follows:



 “(c) Suspension of Employer Matching Contributions 
 Notwithstanding the above or anything else in this Plan, with respect to all Participants (other than those Participants who
the Company determines in its sole discretion are employed by Auto Insurance Specialists, LLC, AIS Management, LLC, or Poliseek AIS Insurance Solutions, Inc.) for each payroll period or other interval determined by the Company in its sole
discretion, commencing on or after April 1, 2009, all Employer Matching Contributions as described above in this Section 3.3 shall be suspended.” 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused its duly authorized officers to execute this amendment
to the Plan this 14th day of May, 2009. 
  

			
	 MERCURY GENERAL CORPORATION

		
	 By:
	 	 /s/ Gabriel Tirador

		
	 Its:
	 	 President and CEO
Case 3:06-cv-00789-MHT-CSC Document 1 Filed 09/01/2006 Page 1 of 3
Case 3:06-cv-00789-MHT-CSC Document 1 Filed 09/01/2006 Page 2 of 3
Case 3:06-cv-00789-MHT-CSC Document 1 Filed 09/01/2006 Page 3 of 3
Case 3:06-cv-00789-MHT-CSC Document 1-2 Filed 09/01/2006 Page 1 of 7
Case 3:06-cv-00789-MHT-CSC Document 1-2 Filed 09/01/2006 Page 2 of 7
Case 3:06-cv-00789-MHT-CSC Document 1-2 Filed 09/01/2006 Page 3 of 7
Case 3:06-cv-00789-MHT-CSC Document 1-2 Filed 09/01/2006 Page 4 of 7
Case 3:06-cv-00789-MHT-CSC Document 1-2 Filed 09/01/2006 Page 5 of 7
Case 3:06-cv-00789-MHT-CSC Document 1-2 Filed 09/01/2006 Page 6 of 7
Case 3:06-cv-00789-MHT-CSC Document 1-2 Filed 09/01/2006 Page 7 of 7
Case 3:06-cv-00789-MHT-CSC Document 1-3 Filed 09/01/2006 Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 329 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 329

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                         July 25, 2005.
Whereas former President William Jefferson Clinton was born in Hope, Arkansas, 
        on August 19, 1946;
Whereas William Jefferson Clinton attended Georgetown University as an 
        undergraduate and received a Rhodes Scholarship in 1968;
Whereas William Jefferson Clinton received a law degree from Yale University in 
        1973;
Whereas William Jefferson Clinton established a record of public service as 
        Attorney General of Arkansas, Governor of Arkansas, and Chairman of the 
        National Governors Association;
Whereas William Jefferson Clinton campaigned for and won the Democratic 
        nomination for President in 1992;
Whereas William Jefferson Clinton was elected the 42d President of the United 
        States in 1992 and was reelected for a second term in 1996;
Whereas during William Jefferson Clinton's time in office the United States 
        experienced 8 years of economic expansion, job growth, and the 
        transformation of a budget deficit into a budget surplus;
Whereas William Jefferson Clinton rallied the members of the North Atlantic 
        Treaty Organization to put an end to ethnic cleansing in the Balkans and 
        to depose the murderous regime of Slobodan Milosevic, actions which 
        eventually led to the signing of the Dayton Peace Accords;
Whereas William Jefferson Clinton played a major role in the Good Friday Peace 
        Accords which finally brought peace to war-torn Northern Ireland;
Whereas William Jefferson Clinton and former President George H. W. Bush were 
        appointed to lead the United States effort to provide private aid to the 
        victims of the devastating tsunami that struck southeast Asia on 
        December 26, 2004; and
Whereas, in the words of President George W. Bush, William Jefferson Clinton 
        ``showed a deep and far-ranging knowledge of public policy, a great 
        compassion for people in need, and the forward-looking spirit the 
        Americans like in a President'': Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives honors former President William 
Jefferson Clinton on the occasion of his 59th birthday on August 19, 2005, and 
extends best wishes to him and his family.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
#### § 205.86 Appeal.

There is no administrative appeal of an interpretation.

(Emergency Petroleum Allocation Act of 1973, Pub. L. 93-159, as amended, Pub. L. 93-511, Pub. L. 94-99, Pub. L. 94-133, Pub. L. 94-163, and Pub. L. 94-385, Federal Energy Administration Act of 1974, Pub. L. 93-275, as amended, Pub. L. 94-385, Energy Policy and Conservation Act, Pub. L. 94-163, as amended, Pub. L. 94-385; E.O. 11790, 39 FR 23185; Department of Energy Organization Act, Pub. L. 95-91; E.O. 12009, 42 FR 46267)

[43 FR 14437, Apr. 6, 1978]
#### In the Matter of Charlotte B. Williams, Respondent, v. Lawrence F. Read, as Superintendent of Utica Schools, Appellant.

Judgment, insofar as appealed from unanimously affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: Appeal is taken from so much of the judgment which directs that petitioner is entitled to receive payment for 140 days sick leave benefits. While Special Term’s denial of petitioner’s application for judgment annulling respondent’s refusal to grant sick leave benefits may have been properly predicated on petitioner’s unsupported requests made on August 26 and October 14, 1966, the record reveals the existence of ample proof that petitioner was physically unable to perform her duties, as evidenced by medical certifications made on July 28, August 7 and August 28, 1967. Benefits, based on these certifications, were erroneously denied by respondent. Paragraph “ 1 ” of the .answer admits petitioner was denied benefits, which she had sought, 'based on the certifications in July and August, 1967, and that part of the determination in the judgment appealed from, was properly made. (Appeal from certain parts of judgment of Oneida Trial Term directing payment of benefits.) Present — Goldman, P. J., Del Vecchio, Marsh, Gabrielli and Moule, JJ. $
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS UNAUDITED SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE SEPTEMBER 30, 1996 10-Q AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH 10-Q.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1996
<CASH>                                          285439
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1277575
<ALLOWANCES>                                    168133
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               1737420
<PP&E>                                         8284780
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                10022200
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         11582989
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               00
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                   (1560789)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  10022200
<SALES>                                        2724215
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               2739982
<CGS>                                          2654164
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  2786308
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              132144
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 431840
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    431840
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    14.49
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    14.49
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>6
<LEGEND> THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE FORM 10-Q AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
<MULTIPLIER>1
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                  SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       9-MOS
<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST>           6,421,516
<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE>            428,900
<RECEIVABLES>                           0
<ASSETS-OTHER>                          0
<OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS>               47,599
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    476,499
<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES>                0
<SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT>                 0
<OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES>         144,738
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES>               144,738
<SENIOR-EQUITY>                         0
<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON>        6,324,377
<SHARES-COMMON-STOCK>             150,570
<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR>             150,570
<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT>               0
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII>                  0
<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS>                 0
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS>                0
<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC>       (5,992,616)
<NET-ASSETS>                      331,761
<DIVIDEND-INCOME>                       0
<INTEREST-INCOME>                     766
<OTHER-INCOME>                     22,131
<EXPENSES-NET>                    167,526
<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME>          (144,629)
<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT>                0
<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT>      (3,167,651)
<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS>          (3,312,280)
<EQUALIZATION>                          0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME>               0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS>                0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER>                   0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD>                 0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED>             0
<SHARES-REINVESTED>                     0
<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS>         (3,312,280)
<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR>                 0
<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR>               0
<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR>                 0
<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR>              0
<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES>              54,306
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      0
<GROSS-EXPENSE>                   167,576
<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS>            1,987,901
<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN>               24.62
<PER-SHARE-NII>                    (21.78)
<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC>                 0
<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND>                    0
<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS>               0
<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL>                    0
<PER-SHARE-NAV-END>                  2.84
<EXPENSE-RATIO>                       8.4

</TABLE>
2007-2146.

#### State ex rel. Bankhead v. Collins.

In Mandamus. On answer of respondent. On S.Ct.Prac.R. X(5) determination, cause dismissed.

Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.
1232.7005 Contract clause.

The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 1252.232–70, Electronic Submission of Payment

Requests, in solicitations and contracts exceeding the micro-purchase threshold, except those for

which the contracting officer has directed or approved otherwise under 1232.7002, and those paid

with a Governmentwide commercial purchase card.

Parent topic: Subpart 1232.70—Electronic Invoicing Requirements
3015.606-2 Evaluation.       (a) Comprehensive evaluations should be completed within sixty calendar days after making the initial review determination. If additional time is needed, then the agency contact point shall advise the offeror accordingly and provide a new evaluation completion date. The evaluating office shall neither reproduce nor disseminate the proposal to other offices without the consent of the contracting office from which the proposal was received for evaluation. If the evaluating office requires additional information from the offeror, the evaluator shall convey this request to the responsible contracting office. The evaluator shall not directly contact the proposal originator.          (b) If the evaluators recommend accepting the proposal, the responsible contracting officer shall ensure compliance with all of the requirements of (FAR) 48 CFR 15.607.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 3015.6—Unsolicited Proposals