alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3540 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3540

       To suspend temporarily the duty on unbleached cheesecloth.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 20, 2006

  Mr. Graham introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
       To suspend temporarily the duty on unbleached cheesecloth.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. UNBLEACHED CHEESECLOTH.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

      

``      9902.52.11        Unbleached              Free      No change       No change       On or before 12/
                           cheesecloth; lawns,                                               31/2009          ''
                           voiles, or batistes,                                                                .
                           less than 85 percent
                           by weight of cotton,
                           mixed with man-made
                           fibers, less than or
                           equal to 200 g/m2, of
                           average yarn, number
                           69 or higher number,
                           of width exceeding
                           225 centimeters
                           (provided for in
                           subheading
                           5210.11.80)..........

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3359 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3359

           To suspend temporarily the duty on diethyl ether.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 5, 2006

Mr. Frist (for himself and Mr. Alexander) introduced the following 
        bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
        FinanceYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
           To suspend temporarily the duty on diethyl ether.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DIETHYL ETHER.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

      

``      9902.29.11        Diethyl ether (CAS No.  Free      No change       No change       On or before 12/
                           60-29-7) (provided                                                31/2009          ''
                           for in subheading                                                                   .
                           2909.11.00)..........

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
with respect to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for 
consumption, on or after the 15th day after the date of enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
PGI 211.1 -SELECTING AND DEVELOPING

REQUIREMENTS DOCUMENTS

Parent topic: PGI Part 211 - DESCRIBING AGENCY NEEDS

PGI 211.105 Items peculiar to one manufacturer.

Office of Federal Procurement Policy memorandum of April 11, 2005, Subject: Use of Brand Name

Specifications, reinforces the need to maintain vendor and technology neutral contract

specifications, and asks agencies to publish the supporting justification when using brand name

specifications in a solicitation.

Office of Federal Procurement Policy memorandum of April 17, 2006, Subject: Publication of Brand

Name Justifications, provides additional guidance regarding publication of justifications for use of

brand name specifications.
[UNIVERSAL DETECTION TECHNOLOGY LETTERHEAD]



August 23, 2004


Mr. Jacques Tizabi
c/o Universal Detection Technology, Inc.
9595 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 700
Beverly Hills, CA 90069

     RE: AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

Dear Mr. Tizabi:

Reference is made to the certain Employment Agreement between Pollution Research
and Control Corporation, now known as UNIVERSAL DETECTION TECHNOLOGY, INC.,
("UDT") on one hand, and JACQUES TIZABI ("Tizabi") on the other, dated as of
September 25, 2001 (the "Agreement").

In consideration of the mutual covenants and promises contained herein, as well
as, other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which
is hereby acknowledged, the parties agree to amend the Agreement as follows:

     1.   Paragraph 3 shall be amended such that the Term of the Agreement shall
          expire on December 31, 2010, unless otherwise extended.

     2.   Paragraph 4.1.2 shall be amended such that the One Hundred Thousand
          Dollars ($100,000.00) shall be accrued and deferred until such time as
          UDT has the financial resources to pay any or all of the accrued
          amount. Commencing on January 1, 2006, the Base Salary shall be
          cumulatively increased by five percent (5%) per year, on the first day
          of each year.

     3.   Paragraph 4.4.2 shall be amended to limit the Automobile Cost to a
          maximum of Two Thousand Five Hundred Dollars ($2,500.00) per month.

     4.   Paragraph 4.4.4 shall be amended to include a reimbursement of
          Officer's individual life insurance premium which shall not exceed One
          Thousand Dollars ($1,000.00) per month. Additionally, UDT shall
          reimburse Tizabi for his health insurance premiums and related
          expenses.

All other terms and conditions contained in the Agreement shall remain in full
force and effect, unless and until modified in writing and signed by the
parties.

If the aforementioned is accepted, understood and agreed to, please indicate
such by affixing your signature below and together with UDT's shall constitute
the entire agreement.

Sincerely,

UNIVERSAL DETECTION TECHNOLOGY, INC.


BY:  /s/ Matin Emouna
---------------------------------
Its:


Accepted, Understood & Agreed:


/s/ Jacques Tizabi
---------------------------------
Jacques Tizabi
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

_______________________________________

)

ALMA T. MCBROOM, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) Civil Action No. 2:06-CV-767-MEF-SRW

)

JOHN E. POTTER, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

_______________________________________ )

MOTION TO DISMISS OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT OF THE AMERICAN POSTAL WORKERS UNION, AFL-CIO

Comes now defendant American Postal Workers Union, AFL-CIO (“APWU” or “National

Union”) and, in accordance with Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, respectfully

moves this Court to dismiss the complaint against the APWU or, in the alternative, to grant summary

judgment for the APWU in accordance with Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Summary

judgment is appropriate because there are no genuine issues of material fact, and the APWU is entitled

to judgment as a matter of law.

In support of this motion, the APWU has included a Memorandum of Law in Support of the

Motion to Dismiss or in the Alternative for Summary Judgment, the Declaration of Terry R. Stapleton

with attached exhibits, and a proposed order.

Case 2:06-cv-00767-MEF-SRW Document 41 Filed 02/20/2007 Page 1 of 3
2

Dated:_February 20, 2007_______ Respectfully submitted,

O’DONNELL, SCHWARTZ & ANDERSON, P.C.

By:____/s/ Brenda Zwack_______

 Brenda C. Zwack (D.C. No. 482673)

 Admitted Pro Hac Vice

 1300 L Street, NW, Suite 1200

 Washington, DC 20005-4126

 Tel (202) 898-1707/Fax (202) 682-9276

 bzwack@odsalaw.com

NAKAMURA, QUINN & WALLS LLP

By:___/s/ Patrick Nakamura________

 Patrick K. Nakamura

 Alabama Bar No. ASB-1814-A64P

 2204 Lakeshore Drive, Suite 130

 Birmingham, AL 35209

 Tel (205) 870-9989/ Fax (205) 803-4143

 nakamura@nqwlaw.com

Attorneys for the American Postal Workers Union, 

AFL-CIO

Case 2:06-cv-00767-MEF-SRW Document 41 Filed 02/20/2007 Page 2 of 3
3

Certificate of Service

I hereby certify that I have this day caused the following people to be served by first class mail

postage pre-paid and (with the exception of Alma McBroom) through the Court’s electronic filing

system with a copy of the foregoing Motion to Dismiss, or in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment

of the American Postal Workers Union, AFL-CIO; Memorandum of Law in Support of the Motion to

Dismiss; and the Submission of Evidence supporting the foregoing Motion:

Alma T. McBroom

921 Hugh St.

Montgomery, AL 36108

Stephen Michael Doyle

United States Attorney’s Office - ALM

Middle District of Alabama

PO Box 197

Montgomery, AL 36101-0197

William Post Roberts, II

Howell, Sarto & Howell

P.O. Box 681864

147 E. Main Street

Prattville, AL 36067

Dated:_February 20, 2007_______ ____/s/ Patrick Nakamura_______________

Case 2:06-cv-00767-MEF-SRW Document 41 Filed 02/20/2007 Page 3 of 3
#### § 205.325 Annual report.

Persons receiving permits to construct, connect, operate or maintain electric transmission facilities at international boundaries shall submit to the ERA, by February 15 each year, a report covering each month of the preceding calendar year, detailing by category the gross amount of kilowatt-hours of energy received or delivered and the cost and revenue associated with each category.
Hon. EolwlJ lllllwlu, Pobruary 14, 1959, pago e 

u8.d f01' th0 ppO8. Of ooabtI’Ucting a County 

garage rhioh gfwagr till be urod for the purpore o! houring reroioing and repairing mac h iner y, l ulpment trucks, tractors, l to., 

whiah mat h&a cry tud oqtipment am wed ln the 

malntwwnoe, repair and oparatlon of the Yobnnan County road system.” 

The Constltutlon Article 3, Seotion 52, raad8, 

In part, aa followr~ 

l , ..thrt under legislative 9rovlslon any 

counti, any political aubdivldon OS a count 

any number of adjoining oountlea, or 

tloal rubdlvlaloa of the State, or 

dlatrlot now or hbreafter to be deaoribed and 

defined within the State of %xar and whIoh 

may or may not include, townr, vlilager or 

munialpal corporationa, upon a vote of a trothirda ma orlt of the rerldent property taxpayerr vo i lng t hereon who are qualiflrd sleotorr 

of such diatrlot or territory to be affected 

therrby, la l ddltlon to all other debts, may 

laaue bonda or othervlrs lend ltr credit in any 

amount aot to exceed one-fourth of the aaser.wd 

valuation ef the real roperty of ruch dlrtrlot 

or territory, except t &p t the total bonded 

lndebtsdnssr of an 

l xorrd the Umlta f 

city or tom ahall never 

mpored by other provlrlonr 

of thla Conrtltutlan, and levy and oollr~~;c~ 

taxes to pa the interest thereon and 

slinking run Lx for the redemption thereo F , aa the 

Leglelaturr may authorize, aad in such manner 

a8 it may authorize the #amo, for the follovlng 

purporer to wit:,.,” 

“(c) !Phe con8tructlon, maintenance and 

operation of mecodandzed, graveled or paved 

roadr and turnpiker, or ln ald thereof.’ 

Article 8, Sectica 9 of the State Constltut~on 

reada as followrt 

“The State t8x on property exolueive Of 

the tax nacsaaary to pay the public debt, and 

Barr ZlolYb~ v1luMb, YbbFwl7 14, 19939, ?qo 4 



fba. 801-7 tiUJ.m+ Pebnurf 14, 1939, ?qy 8
Open Literature Review Summary

Chemical Name: Atrazine

CAS No: 1912-24-9

PC Code: 080803

ECOTOX Record Number and Citation: Kraak, G. (2014) The Effects of Atrazine on th e Cortisol Stress Response in the Zebrafish (Danio rerio): Final Report. Project Number: TK0122394. Unpublished study prepared by University of Guelph. 20p. MRID 49639108

Date of Review: March 1, 2016

Author’s Abstract “The present study examined the effects of at razine on basal and forced swimming induced changes in whole body Cortisol content in adul t zebrafish. Zebrafish were exposed to graded concentrations of atrazine or the atrazine degradates deisopropylatrazine (DIA), deethylatrazine (DEA) and diamino-s-chlorotriazi ne (DACT) for up to 10 days. Some fish were sampled for the measurement of whole body Cortis ol levels under basal conditions while others were sampled after being subjected to a 20 min swimming challenge in order to quantify stress induced Cortisol levels. In one experiment, zebr afish were subjected to two bouts of forced swimming three hours apart to test whether prior atrazine exposure affects the ability of the fish to respond appropriately to a repeated st ressor. The results demons trated that controls not exposed to atrazine and zebrafish exposed to atrazine or the atrazine degradates at nominal concentrations of up to 100 pg/L consis tently exhibited increased whole body Cortisol content in response to the swimming challenge. Separate analyses revealed few changes in basal or stress induced Cortisol levels following atrazine exposure. Overall, these data suggest that atrazine and some of its degradates at th e concentrations tested have minimal effects on the Cortisol mediated stress response in the zebrafish.”

Description of Use in Document (QUAL, QU AN, INV): Not Reviewed for Classification

Reviewer Conclusions: A brief review of the study results indicate that the direct effects on the cortisol stress response do not result in more sensitive endpoints for fi sh following chronic exposure to atrazine, and

thus would not contribute new data for refinement of current chronic fish conclusions in the risk assessment. Therefore this study was no t fully reviewed for inclusion in the risk assessment. If, at a later time, these data are to be utilized for regulatory decision making, then a complete review of the study shou ld be conducted at that time.

Limitations: This study was not fully reviewed for sc ientific or regulatory limitations.Primary Reviewer: Frank T. Farruggia Ph.D., EPA/OCSPP/OPP/EFED/ERB3

Digitally signed by FRANK FARRUGGIA DN: c=US, o=U.S. Government, ou=USEPA, ou=Staff, cn=FRANK FARRUGGIA, dnQualifier=0000048865

Date: 2016.04.14 08:42:26 -04'00'
1252.301 Solicitation provisions and contract

clauses (matrix).

The TAR matrix is not published in the CFR. It is available on the Acquisition.gov website at

https://www.acquisition.gov/TAR.

Parent topic: Subpart 1252.3—Provision and Clause Matrix
# SUBCHAPTER G—CONTRACT MANAGEMENT   

- PART 1242—CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION AND AUDIT SERVICES 
- PART 1245 [RESERVED] 
- PART 1246—QUALITY ASSURANCE 
- PART 1247—TRANSPORTATION 

- PART 1242—CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION AND AUDIT SERVICES    - Subpart 1242.1—Contract Audit Services     - 1242.101   Contract audit responsibilities.
    - 1242.102   Assignment of contract audit services.
    - 1242.170   Contract clause.
  - Subpart 1242.2—Contract Administration Services     - 1242.270   Contract clauses.
  - Subpart 1242.3—Contract Administration Office Functions     - 1242.302   Contract administration functions.
  - Subpart 1242.15—Contractor Performance Information     - 1242.1503   Procedures.
- PART 1245 [RESERVED]   
- PART 1246—QUALITY ASSURANCE    - Subpart 1246.1—General     - 1246.101   Definitions.
    - 1246.101-70   Additional definitions.
  - Subpart 1246.7—Warranties     - 1246.705-70   Limitations—restrictions.
    - 1246.706-70   Warranty terms and conditions—requirements.
- PART 1247—TRANSPORTATION    - Subpart 1247.5—Ocean Transportation by U.S.-Flag Vessels     - 1247.506   Procedures.
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE MIDDE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

EASTERN DIVISION (OPELIKA) 

ELIZABETH LYNNE HUTCHINSON ) 

 ) 

 Plaintiff, ) 

 ) 

vs. ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 

3:06-cv-00700-WHA 

THE PHENIX CITY BOARD OF ) 

EDUCATION and LARRY E. DiCHIARA ) 

 ) 

 Defendants ) 

 AMENDED REPORT PARTIES PLANNING MEETING

 

 Pursuant to the Order of this Court of November 9, 2007, (Doc. #55), counsel for the above 

parties respectfully request that the deadlines for discovery, disclosure of witnesses and exhibits 

and specification of deposition excerpts be extended to January 7, 2008. 

 This the 20th day of November 2007. 

 

Respectfully Submitted, 

/s/Sydney S. Smith 

Smith & Smith, P.C. 

Attorneys for Defendants 

Phenix City Board of Education 

Larry E. DiChiara 

1503 Broad Street 

Phenix City, AL 36867 

334-298-2679 

ASB-4248-T82S 

 Ssmith4843@aol.com 

 /s/ Joshua D. Wilson, Esq. 

 Wiggins, Childs, Quinn & Pantazis, LLC. 

 The Kress Building 

 301 19th Street North 

 Birmingham, Alabama 35203 

 jwilson@wcqp.com

 

Case 3:06-cv-00700-WHA-WC Document 56 Filed 11/20/2007 Page 1 of 2
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

We hereby certify that we have served the Amended Report of Parties Planning Meeting 

upon counsel for all parties, by electronic filing and by email on this 20th day of November, 

2007. 

/s/Sydney S. Smith 

Smith & Smith, P.C. 

Attorneys for Defendants 

Phenix City Board of Education 

Larry E. DiChiara 

1503 Broad Street 

Phenix City, AL 36867 

334-298-2679 

ASB-4248-T82S 

 Ssmith4843@aol.com

 Joshua D. Wilson, Esq. 

 Wiggins, Childs, Quinn & Pantazis, LLC. 

 The Kress Building 

 301 19th Street North 

 Birmingham, Alabama 35203 

 jwilson@wcqp.com

 

 

Case 3:06-cv-00700-WHA-WC Document 56 Filed 11/20/2007 Page 2 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

EASTERN DIVISION 

ANGELA PRICE, 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

ROANOKE CITY BOARD OF 

EDUCATION, 

 Defendant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

CIVIL ACTION NUMBER: 

3:06-cv-742-MEF 

DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 

Defendant moves this Court, pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of 

Civil Procedure, for an order of summary judgment as to each and every claim 

Plaintiff asserts in his Complaint against it. In support of this motion, Defendant 

states that no genuine issue of material fact exists as to any of the Plaintiff’s claims 

and Defendant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. 

This motion will be supported by a brief in support of motion for summary 

judgment and evidentiary submittals which Defendant will file contemporaneously 

with this motion. 

Case 3:06-cv-00742-MEF-WC Document 17 Filed 08/06/2007 Page 1 of 2
2

 s/Donald B. Sweeney, Jr. 

DONALD B. SWEENEY, JR. 

(SWE002) 

OF COUNSEL

Bradley Arant Rose & White LLP

One Federal Place 

1819 Fifth Avenue North 

Birmingham, AL 35203-2119 

Telephone: (205) 521-8000 

Facsimile: (205) 521-8800 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on August 6, 2007, I electronically filed the 

foregoing with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send 

notification of such filing to the following: 

Adam M. Porter, Esq. 

2301 Morris Avenue, Suite 102 

Birmingham, AL 35203 

and I hereby certify that I have mailed by United States Postal Service the 

document to the following non-CM/ECF participants: 

NONE 

Respectfully submitted, 

s/ Donald B. Sweeney, Jr. 

Donald B. Sweeney, Jr. (ASB-3803-

W77D) 

Case 3:06-cv-00742-MEF-WC Document 17 Filed 08/06/2007 Page 2 of 2
EX-34.2
McGladrey LLP


(logo) McGladrey


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


To the Board of Directors
Pentalpha Surveillance, LLC


We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying
Management's Report on Assessment of 2012 Compliance with Applicable Servicing
Criteria (Management's Assertion), that Pentalpha Surveillance, LLC (the
Company) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in item 1122(d) of the
Securities and Exchange Commission's (SEC) Regulation AB for services by the
Company that are encompassed by contractual obligations to perform Regulation
AB reporting (the Platform), including only those asset-backed securities
transactions defined below, as of and for the year ended December 31, 2012,
excluding the following criteria set forth in items 1122(d)(1)(i-iv),
1122(d)(2)(i-vii), 1122(d)(3)(ii-iv), 1122(d)(4)(i-vi) and
1122(d)(4)(viii-xv), which management has determined are not applicable to the
activities performed by the Company with respect to the Platform. Appendix A to
Management's Assertion identifies the individual asset-backed transactions
identified by management as constituting the Platform. Management is
responsible for the Company's compliance with its contractual obligations and
its assertion. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on Management's
Assertion based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards
established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, as
adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and,
accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's
activities related to the Platform and other procedures as we considered
necessary in the circumstances. Our procedures were limited to selected
servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this
report. Further, an examination is not designed to detect noncompliance arising
from errors that may have occurred prior to the period specified above that may
have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company
during the period covered by this report.

We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's
compliance with the servicing criteria or its contractual obligations.

In our opinion, Management's Assertion as of and for the year ended December
31, 2012 for the Platform, is fairly stated, in all material respects.


/s/ McGladrey LLP


Irvine, CA
February 25, 2013


Member of the RSM International network of Independent accounting, tax and
consulting firms.