alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 

### Farquharson, Chenise

From: Farquharson, Chenise Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2015 3:53 PM To: cristal@clemonsmgmt.com Cc: Hufford, Drusilla; Newberg, Cindy; Maranion, Bella; Sheppard, Margaret Subject: FSSA Comments re: Change of Status of HFCs under Cl ean Air Act Section 612 (SNAP Program) Attachments: EPA Response to FSSA re HFCs and SNAP petitions_12- 22-15.pdf

Dear Ms. LeGrand:

Thank you for your letter of December 2, 2015, to A dministrator Gina McCarthy. Please see the attached response.

Sincerely,

Chenise Farquharson Alternatives and Emissions Reduction Branch OAR/OAP/SPD U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
WJC East 4355FF (202) 564-7768 Farquharson.chenise@epa.gov

From: "Crista LeGrand, CAE, CMP" < cristal@clemonsmgmt.com > Date: December 4, 2015 at 3:24:18 PM EST
To: " McCarthy.gina@Epa.gov " < McCarthy.gina@Epa.gov > Cc: " Newberg.Cindy@epa.gov " < Newberg.Cindy@epa.gov >, " Maranion.Bella@epa.gov "

< Maranion.Bella@epa.gov >, " Sheppard.Margaret@epa.gov " < Sheppard.Margaret@epa.gov > Subject: FSSA Comments re: Change of Status of HFCs under Cl ean Air Act Section 612 (SNAP Program)

Dear Administrator McCarthy:

Attached please find comments from the Fire Suppres sion Systems Association (FSSA) in regards to the change of status of HFCs under Clean Air Act Section 612 (SNAP Program).

Thank you in advance for your review.

Best regards,

Crista LeGrand, CAE, CMP Executive Director Fire Suppression Systems Association (FSSA) Phone: 410-931-8100/Fax: 410-931-8111 http://www.fssa.net

*************************************************** ************

The mission of FSSA

is to promote the use of, and be the leading recog nized authority on, special hazard fire protection systems; employing existing and new technologies to safeguard people, high-value asset s and the environment.
Editorial Note on Part 30
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 30 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

§ 30.55 Tritium reports. ( a ) - ( b ) [Reserved]
( c ) Except as specified in paragraph (d) of this section, each licensee who is authorized to possess tritium shall report promptly to the appropriate NRC Regional Office listed in appendix D of part 20 of this chapter by telephone and telegraph, mailgram, or facsimile any incident in which an attempt has been made or is believed to have been made to commit a theft or unlawful diversion of more than 10 curies of such material at any one time or more than 100 curies of such material in any one calendar year. The initial report shall be followed within a period of fifteen (15) days by a written report submitted to the appropriate NRC Regional Office which sets forth the details of the incident and its consequences. Copies of such written report shall be sent to the Director, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards , using an appropriate method listed in § 30.6(a). Subsequent to the submission of the written report required by this paragraph, the licensee shall promptly inform the Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards by means of a written report of any substantive additional information, which becomes available to the licensee, concerning an attempted or apparent theft or unlawful diversion of tritium.
( d ) The reports described in this section are not required for tritium possessed pursuant to a general license provided in part 31 of this chapter or for tritium contained in spent fuel.
[37 FR 9208, May 6, 1972, as amended at 38 FR 1271, Jan. 11, 1973; 38 FR 2330, Jan. 24, 1973; 41 FR 16446, Apr. 19, 1976; 43 FR 6922, Feb. 17, 1978; 46 FR 55085, Nov. 6, 1981; 49 FR 24707, June 15, 1984; 52 FR 31611, Aug. 21, 1987; 68 FR 58804, Oct. 10, 2003; 73 FR 5718, Jan. 31, 2008]
###### Editorial Note on Part 34

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 34 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

#### § 34.53 Posting.

All areas in which industrial radiography is being performed must be conspicuously posted as required by § 20.1902(a) and (b) of this chapter. Exceptions listed in § 20.1903 of this chapter do not apply to industrial radiographic operations.

[62 FR 28963, May 28, 1997, as amended at 66 FR 64738, Dec. 14, 2001]
§ 217.73 Notification of failure to comply. ( a ) At the conclusion of an audit, investigation, or other inquiry, or at any other time, the Department of Energy may inform the person in writing where compliance with the requirements of the Defense Production Act and other applicable statutes, this part, or an official action were not met.
( b ) In cases where the Department of Energy determines that failure to comply with the provisions of the Defense Production Act and other applicable statutes, this part, or an official action was inadvertent, the person may be informed in writing of the particulars involved and the corrective action to be taken. Failure to take corrective action may then be construed as a willful violation of the Defense Production Act and other applicable statutes, this part, or an official action.
1901.000 Scope of part.

This part describes the method by which the Broadcasting Board of Governors implements and

supplements the Federal Acquisition Regulation and contains policies and procedures that

implement and supplement Chapter 1 of the Federal Acquisition Regulation (48 CFR).

Parent topic: PART 1901 - THE BROADCASTING BOARD OF GOVERNORS ACQUISITION

REGULATION SYSTEM
Case 2:06-cv-00767-MEF-SRW Document 40 Filed 02/12/2007 Page 1 of 1
#### HELLER v. BODENSIEK.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

June 19, 1914.)

Action by Joseph B. Heller against Jennie M. Bodensiek.

No opinion. Application denied, with $10 costs. Order signed. See, also, 81 Misc. Rep. 222, 142 N. Y. Supp. 496.
3035.70-2 Contract clause.

(a) The contracting officer shall use the clause at (HSAR) 48 CFR 3052.235–70, Dissemination of

Information—Educational Institutions, in contracts with educational institutions for research that is

not sensitive or classified.

(b) If the contract involves sensitive or classified research, the contracting officer shall prepare and

insert a Special Contract Requirement that conditions dissemination upon the approval of a

designated Government official.

Parent topic: Subpart 3035.70—Information Dissemination by Educational Institutions
Editorial Note on Part 35
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 35 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

§ 35.500 Use of sealed sources and medical devices for diagnosis. ( a ) A licensee must use only sealed sources that are not in medical devices for diagnostic medical uses if the sealed sources are approved in the Sealed Source and Device Registry for diagnostic medicine. The sealed sources may be used for diagnostic medical uses that are not explicitly listed in the Sealed Source and Device Registry but must be used in accordance with the radiation safety conditions and limitations described in the Sealed Source and Device Registry.
( b ) A licensee must only use medical devices containing sealed sources for diagnostic medical uses if both the sealed sources and medical devices are approved in the Sealed Source and Device Registry for diagnostic medical uses. The diagnostic medical devices may be used for diagnostic medical uses that are not explicitly listed in the Sealed Source and Device Registry but must be used in accordance with the radiation safety conditions and limitations described in the Sealed Source and Device Registry.
( c ) Sealed sources and devices for diagnostic medical uses may be used in research in accordance with an active Investigational Device Exemption (IDE) application accepted by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration provided the requirements of § 35.49(a) are met.
[83 FR 33110, July 16, 2018]
§ 1040.69 Preemployment inquiries. ( a ) Except as provided in paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section, a recipient may not conduct a pre-employment medical examination or may not make pre-employment inquiry of an applicant as to whether the applicant is a handicapped person or as to the nature or severity of a handicap. A recipient may, however, make pre-employment inquiry into an applicant's ability to perform job-related functions.
( b ) When a recipient is taking remedial action to correct the effects of past discrimination, under § 1040.7 of this part, or is taking voluntary action to overcome the effects of conditions that resulted in limited participation in its federally assisted program or activity under § 1040.7 of subpart A of this part, or when a recipient is taking affirmative action under Sec. 503 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, the recipient may invite applicants for employment to indicate whether, and to what extent, they are handicapped *Provided that:* ( 1 ) The recipient states clearly on any written questionnaire used for this purpose or makes clear orally, if no written questionnaire is used, that the information requested is intended for use solely in connection with its remedial action obligations or its voluntary or affirmative action efforts; and
( 2 ) The recipient states clearly that the information is requested on a voluntary basis, that it will be kept confidential as provided in paragraph (d) of this section, that refusal to provide it will not subject the applicant or employee to any adverse treatment, and that it will be used only in accordance with this subpart.
( c ) Nothing in this section is to prohibit a recipient from conditioning an offer of employment on the results of a medical examination conducted prior to the employee's entrance on duty provided that all entering employees are subjected to the examination regardless of handicap or absence of handicap and results of the examination are used only in accordance with the requirements of this subpart.
( d ) Information obtained in accordance with this section concerning the medical condition or history of the applicant is to be collected and maintained on separate forms that are to be accorded confidentiality as medical records, except that: ( 1 ) Supervisors and managers may be informed regarding restrictions on the work or duties of handicapped persons and regarding necessary accommodations;
( 2 ) First aid and safety personnel may be informed, where appropriate, if the condition might require emergency treatment; and
( 3 ) Government officials investigating compliance with Sec. 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, shall be provided relevant information upon request.
Editorial Note on Part 2
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

§ 2.201 Notice of violation. ( a ) In response to an alleged violation of any provision of the Act or this chapter or the conditions of a license or an order issued by the Commission, the Commission may serve on the licensee or other person subject to the jurisdiction of the Commission a written notice of violation; a separate notice may be omitted if an order pursuant to § 2.202 or demand for information pursuant to § 2.204 is issued that otherwise identifies the apparent violation. The notice of violation will concisely state the alleged violation and may require that the licensee or other person submit, within 20 days of the date of the notice or other specified time, a written explanation or statement in reply if the Commission believes that the licensee has not already addressed all the issues contained in the notice of violation, including: ( 1 ) Corrective steps which have been taken by the licensee or other person and the results achieved;
( 2 ) Corrective steps which will be taken; and
( 3 ) The date when full compliance will be achieved.
( b ) The notice may require the licensee or other person subject to the jurisdiction of the Commission to admit or deny the violation and to state the reasons for the violation, if admitted. It may provide that, if an adequate reply is not received within the time specified in the notice, the Commission may issue an order or a demand for information as to why the license should not be modified, suspended or revoked or why such other action as may be proper should not be taken.
[56 FR 40684, Aug. 15, 1991, as amended at 61 FR 43408, Aug. 22, 1996]
#### § 221.1 Scope.

This part sets forth the procedures to be utilized by the Economic Regulatory Administration of the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense whenever the priority supply of crude oil and petroleum products is necessary or appropriate to meet national defense needs. The procedures available in this part are intended to supplement but not to supplant other regulations of the ERA regarding the allocation of crude oil, residual fuel oil and refined petroleum products.
16.601 Time–and–materials contracts.

(d) Limitations.

(S-90) The contracting officer shall include “not to exceed” price ceilings in each option and delivery

order.

(S-91) Contracting officers shall migrate time-and-material and labor-hour (T&M/LH) vehicles to

other contract types, preferably a fixed- price arrangement, when the service becomes repetitive and

more predictable in nature.

(S-92) HCAs shall annually monitor their percentage of acquisition dollars being spent on T&M/LH

contracts and orders. HCAs shall report to the CAE at the close of the calendar year any percentages

of T&M/LH contract action dollars for the preceding fiscal year exceeding 8 percent of service

dollars, including a discussion of the HCA’s strategy to decrease the use of T&M/LH contract type

and the risk mitigation measures used in administering these contract types.

Parent topic: SUBPART 16.6 – TIME–AND–MATERIALS, LABOR–HOUR, AND LETTER

CONTRACTS
IV 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 16

Supporting the goals of National Manufacturing Week, congratulating manufacturers and their employees for their contributions growth and innovation, and recognizing the challenges facing the manufacturing sector. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 4, 2005

Mr. GILLMOR submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

RESOLUTION

Supporting the goals of National Manufacturing Week, congratulating manufacturers and their employees for their 

contributions growth and innovation, and recognizing the 

challenges facing the manufacturing sector.

Whereas for more than a century, the manufacturing sector 

has been the primary source of economic growth in the 

United States; 

Whereas manufacturing is central to both economic security 

and national security; 

Whereas every dollar in manufactured goods sold generates 

an additional $1.43 in intermediate economic activity, 

which is an output higher than that of any other economic sector; 
2

•HRES 16 IH 

Whereas manufacturers are responsible for almost 2⁄3 of all 

private-sector research and development conducted in the 

United States, which benefits other manufacturers and 

other industries; 

Whereas manufactured goods make up 62 percent of products exported from the United States, a number that is 

double the percentage of 10 years ago; 

Whereas in the last 20 years, manufacturing productivity has 

increased twice as much as productivity in other economic sectors, enabling American manufacturers to pay 

employees higher wages and at the same time to compete 

in a world market; 

Whereas employees in the manufacturing sector are compensated an average of more than $54,000 annually, the 

highest average compensation level in the private sector; 

Whereas the manufacturing sector has contributed significantly to economic growth and tax receipts at all levels 

of government, paying 1⁄3 of all corporate taxes collected 

by State and local governments; and 

Whereas March 7–10, 2005, has been designated as National 

Manufacturing Week by the National Association of Manufacturers as a week to celebrate the contributions of 

manufacturing to the United States economy: Now, 

therefore, be it

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

2 (1) supports the goals of National Manufac3 turing Week; 

4 (2) congratulates manufacturers and their em5 ployees for their ongoing contributions to growth 

6 and innovation and for the key role they play in pro-
3

•HRES 16 IH 

1 moting and ensuring a brighter and stronger future 

2 for the Nation; and 

3 (3) recognizes that the manufacturing sector is 

4 facing serious, new challenges to its international 

5 preeminence which affect prospects for future 

6 growth of the United States economy.

Æ
#### § 20.1602 Control of access to very high radiation areas.

In addition to the requirements in § 20.1601, the licensee shall institute additional measures to ensure that an individual is not able to gain unauthorized or inadvertent access to areas in which radiation levels could be encountered at 500 rads (5 grays) or more in 1 hour at 1 meter from a radiation source or any surface through which the radiation penetrates.
Editorial Note on Part 4
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 4 appear at 77 FR 39904, July 6, 2012.

§ 4.331 Compliance reviews. ( a ) NRC may conduct compliance reviews and preaward reviews of recipients or use other similar procedures that will permit it to investigate and correct violations of the Act and these regulations. NRC may conduct these reviews even in absence of a complaint against a recipient. The review may be as comprehensive as necessary to determine whether a violation of these regulations has occurred.
( b ) If a compliance review or preaward review indicates a violation of the Act or these regulations, NRC will attempt to achieve voluntary compliance with the Act. If voluntary compliance cannot be achieved, NRC will arrange for enforcement as described in § 4.336.
#### Royal & Sun Alliance et al., Respondents, v New York Central Mutual Insurance Company, Appellant, et al., Defendant.

[814 NYS2d 553]

*887In an action for a judgment, inter alia, declaring that the plaintiff Royal & Sun Alliance is entitled to reimbursement from the defendant New York Central Mutual Insurance Company of all costs associated with the defense and settlement of an underlying personal injury action entitled *Basso v Felsenburg,*commenced in the Supreme Court, Kings County, under Index No. 564/97, the defendant New York Central Mutual Insurance Company appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Bayne, J.), dated June 14, 2005, which granted the plaintiffs’ motion to confirm a report of a judicial hearing officer dated February 28, 2004, and for summary judgment declaring that the plaintiff Royal & Sun Alliance is entitled to reimbursement from it of all costs associated with the defense and settlement of the underlying personal injury action.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for the entry of a judgment declaring that the plaintiff Royal & Sun Alliance is entitled to reimbursement from the defendant New York Central Mutual Insurance Company of all costs associated with the defense and settlement of the underlying personal injury action.

The Supreme Court properly confirmed the report of the judicial hearing officer (hereinafter the JHO), who was appointed to hear and report on the issue of whether the vehicle owned by the appellant’s insured was a “private passenger auto.” “Where a referee’s findings are supported by the record, the court should confirm the referee’s report and adopt the recommendation made therein” *(Shen v Shen,*21 AD3d 1078, 1079 [2005]; *see Slater v Links at N. Hills,*262 AD2d 299 [1999]). The JHO’s finding that the subject vehicle remained a private passenger auto despite the fact that the insured’s son also used it for his volunteer work is supported by the evidence presented at the hearing, and we decline to disturb it. Furthermore, since the exclusion upon which the appellant relied in disclaiming coverage did not apply to the use of a “private passenger auto,” the Supreme Court properly granted that branch of the plaintiffs’ motion which was for summary judgment.

Since this is a declaratory judgment action, the Supreme Court should have directed the entry of a judgment making the appropriate declaration in favor of the plaintiffs *(see Lanza v**888*Wagner,*11 NY2d 317, 334 [1962], *appeal dismissed*371 US 74 [1962], *cert denied*371 US 901 [1962]). Krausman, J.P., Luciano, Fisher and Dillon, JJ., concur.
#### In the Matter of Shawn Green, Appellant, v Glenn S. Goord, as Commissioner of the New York State Department of Correctional Services, Respondent.

Submitted October 22, 2007;

decided December 18, 2007

Reported below, 42 AD3d 971, 2007 NY Slip Op 79837(U).

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the July 2007 Appellate Division order, dismissed as untimely *(see*CPLR 5513 [b]; *Eaton v State of New York,*76 NY2d 824 [1990]); motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the September 2007 Appellate Division order denying reargument, dismissed upon the ground that such order does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution. Motion for poor person relief dismissed as academic.
EXHIBIT 35.5

SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

American Express Bank, FSB

American Express Issuance Trust II

Reporting Period January 1, 2013 to December 31, 2013

The undersigned, a duly
authorized officer of American Express Bank, FSB (AEFSB), a wholly-owned subsidiary of American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc. (TRS), pursuant to the Amended and Restated Supplemental Servicing Agreement, dated
as of March 12, 2013, among TRS, AEFSB, American Express Centurion Bank and American Express Receivables Financing Corporation VIII LLC (as amended from time to time, the Agreement), does hereby certify that:

1. AEFSB performs certain servicing procedures on behalf of TRS under the Agreement.

2. The undersigned is duly authorized to execute and deliver this Certificate.

3. A review of
AEFSBs activities during the reporting period and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under my supervision.

4. To the
best of my knowledge, based on such review, AEFSB has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the reporting period.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this
20thday of March, 2014.



|                           |  |                                        
|-------------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------
|AMERICAN EXPRESS BANK, FSB
|                           | 
|By:                        |  | /s/ Denise D. Roberts                  
|Name:                      |  | Denise D. Roberts                      
|Title:                     |  | Chief Financial Officer                
|                           | 
|By:                        |  | /s/ Paul A. Thompson                   
|Name:                      |  | Paul A. Thompson                       
|Title:                     |  | Vice President  Controller, US Banking