alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3444 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3444

To suspend temporarily the duty on 1H-Imidazole-4-methanol, 5-methyl-2-
                             phenyl-(9Cl).

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 6, 2006

   Mr. Reid introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To suspend temporarily the duty on 1H-Imidazole-4-methanol, 5-methyl-2-
                             phenyl-(9Cl).

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. 1H-IMIDAZOLE-4-METHANOL, 5-METHYL-2-PHENYL-(9CL).

    (a) In General.--Subchapter II of chapter 99 of the Harmonized 
Tariff Schedule of the United States is amended by inserting in 
numerical sequence the following new heading:

      

``      9902.29.12        1H-Imidazole-4-         Free      No change       No change       On or before 12/
                           methanol, 5-methyl-2-                                             31/2009          ''
                           phenyl-(9Cl)                                                                        .
                           (provided for in
                           subheading
                           2933.29.90) (CAS No.
                           13682-32-1)..........

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) applies 
to goods entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or 
after the 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Subpart 2105.70 - Applicability

Parent topic: PART 2105 - PUBLICIZING CONTRACT ACTIONS

2105.7001 Applicability.

FAR part 5 has no practical application to the FEGLI Program because the requirements for eligible

contractors (i.e., qualified life insurance companies) are stated in 5 U.S.C. 8709.
§ 429.58 Furnace fans. ( a ) *Sampling plan for selection of units for testing.* ( 1 ) The requirements of § 429.11 are applicable to furnace fans; and
( 2 ) For each basic model of furnace fan within the scope of appendix AA of subpart B of part 430, a sample of sufficient size shall be randomly selected and tested to ensure that any represented value of fan energy rating (FER), rounded to the nearest integer, shall be greater than or equal to the higher of: ( i ) The mean of the sample, where: And, *x̄* is the sample mean; *n* is the number of samples; and *x* *i* is the measured value for the ith sample; Or,
( ii ) The upper 90 percent confidence limit (UCL) of the true mean divided by 1.05, where: And *x̄* is the sample mean; *s* is the sample standard deviation; *n* is the number of samples; and *t* *0.90* is the t statistic for a 90% one-tailed confidence interval with n-1 degrees of freedom (from Appendix A).
( b ) *Certification reports.* ( 1 ) The requirements of § 429.12 are applicable to residential furnace fans; and
( 2 ) Pursuant to § 429.12(b)(13), a certification report shall include the following public product-specific information: The fan energy rating (FER) in watts per thousand cubic feet per minute (W/1000 cfm); the calculated maximum airflow at the reference system external static pressure (ESP) in cubic feet per minute (cfm); the control system configuration for achieving the heating and constant-circulation airflow-control settings required for determining FER as specified in the furnace fan test procedure (10 CFR part 430, subpart B, appendix AA); the measured steady-state gas, oil, or electric heat input rate (QIN) in the heating setting required for determining FER; and for modular blowers, the manufacturer and model number of the electric heat resistance kit with which it is equipped for certification testing.
[79 FR 520, Jan. 3, 2014, as amended at 79 FR 38208, July 3, 2014]
<PAGE>

                                                                   Exhibit 99(1)


         PRESIDENT'S CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                   AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in connection
with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Encore Computer Corporation (the
"Company") for the period ended September 30, 2002, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, the
President of the Company, certifies that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


/s/ Michael C. Veysey
--------------------------------
Michael C. Veysey

President

November 12, 2002
#### In the Matter of the Claim of Demetrio Sosa, Appellant. Martin P. Catherwood, as Industrial Commissioner, Respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

Appeal by claimant from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board which disqualified him from benefits on the ground that he voluntarily left his employment without good cause by provoking his discharge. (Unemployment Insurance Law [Labor Law, art. 18], § 593, subd. 1, par. [a].) The discharge followed after claimant was stopped by a guard at the gate while taking from the premises a small piece of scrap metal, without permission of his foreman. The board found, upon substantial evidence, that the employer sold small pieces of scrap which it could not use in its production and, upon request, permitted its employees to take such pieces, charging them the scrap price; that the employer had been encountering a good deal of trouble with pilferage and to combat it had hired a guard and posted notices that any *865employee discovered by the guard to be removing property without permission would be discharged; and that claimant some years before had been reprimanded for attempting to take away a junked table and was warned to get permission in future. The board found: “ Claimant knew or should have known that it was against company rules for him to remove company property without getting permission of the foreman. This is evident not only from the notices which were posted on the bulletin board but from the fact that the claimant himself testified that he was informed at the time of the previous incident not to remove any material without permission of the foreman. Even though the material removed by claimant had small value, he was aware of the company policy and knew or should have known, that his failure to abide by the policy could bring about his discharge.” Regrettable as claimant’s discharge may be, we cannot view as arbitrary or unreasonable the board’s purely factual determination in his case. *(Matter of Braccino*[Catherwood], 30 A D 2d 609; *Matter of Glassmith*[Catherwood], 27 A D 2d 584.) Trifling as the value of the metal may have been, it was not for the employee to determine when and if the rules and penalties adopted by the employer to meet its pilferage problem should be relaxed and their exemplary effect mitigated. Neither the employer nor, in turn, the board was obliged to be satisfied with claimant’s explanation that the value of the metal was small and the foreman from whom he should have sought permission was new. Decision affirmed, without costs. Gibson, P. J., Reynolds, Staley, Jr., and Greenblott, JJ., concur in memorandum *Per Curiam;*Aulisi, J., not voting.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>           5
       
<S>                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>       9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>   DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>        SEP-30-1996
<CASH>   293,724
<SECURITIES>   588,151   <F1>
<RECEIVABLES>   81,623
<ALLOWANCES>    0
<INVENTORY>    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>    0
<PP&E>   12,149,804 <F2>
<DEPRECIATION>   2,681,647  
<TOTAL-ASSETS>   10,725,729
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>    0
<BONDS>   6,318,972 <F3>
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>    0
<PREFERRED>    0
<COMMON>   3,249,999  <F4>
<OTHER-SE>    0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>   10,725,729
<SALES>    0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>   1,119,332  <F5>
<CGS>    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>   1,003,765   <F6>
<OTHER-EXPENSES>   62,319   <F7>
<LOSS-PROVISION>    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>   418,005
<INCOME-PRETAX>    0
<INCOME-TAX>    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>    0
<DISCONTINUED>    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>    0
<CHANGES>    0
<NET-INCOME>   53,248
<EPS-PRIMARY>    0
<EPS-DILUTED>    0

<FN>
<F1>   "SECURITIES" REPRESENTS INVESTMENT IN JOINT VENTURE
<F2>   "PP&E" REPRESENTS INVESTMENT IN REAL ESTATE [LAND AND
BUILDING]
<F3>   "BONDS" REPRESENTS MORTGAGES PAYABLE
<F4>   "COMMON" REPRESENTS TOTAL PARTNERS' CAPITAL
<F5>   "TOTAL REVENUES" REPRESENTS RENTAL, INTEREST, AND OTHER
INCOME
<F6>   "TOTAL COSTS" REPRESENTS TOTAL EXPENSES
<F7>   "OTHER EXPENSES" REPRESENTS EQUITY AND MINORITY INTEREST
IN JOINT VENTURES' NET INCOME/LOSS
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Case 2:06-cr-00200-WHA-CSC Document 96 Filed 01/04/2007 Page 1 of 1
#### PEOPLE, Respondent, v. ROMA, Appellant.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department.

January 25, 1915.)

Proceeding by the People of the State of New York against Charles Roma.

No opinion. Motion to dismiss appeal denied, on condition that defendant perfect his appeal, place the case on the March calendar, and be ready for argument when reached; otherwise, motion granted. Motion for leave to be heard on original record denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 239 Reported in House (RH)]

                                                  House Calendar No. 28
109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 239

                          [Report No. 109-57]

       Dismissing the election contest relating to the office of 
   Representative from the Sixth Congressional District of Tennessee.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             April 27, 2005

   Mr. Ney, from the Committee on House Administration, reported the 
  following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and 
                         ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
       Dismissing the election contest relating to the office of 
   Representative from the Sixth Congressional District of Tennessee.

    Resolved, That the election contest relating to the office of 
Representative from the Sixth Congressional District of Tennessee is 
dismissed.
                                                  House Calendar No. 28

109th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                              H. RES. 239

                          [Report No. 109-57]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

       Dismissing the election contest relating to the office of 
   Representative from the Sixth Congressional District of Tennessee.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             April 27, 2005

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed
```
3001.7001 Content.

The general format at (HSAR) 48 CFR 3001.704 shall be used to provide a justification to support

the requested determination, waiver, exception or approval.

Parent topic: Subpart 3001.70—Other Determinations, Waivers, Exceptions, Approvals, Reviews,

and Submittals
73°00 Ll

39°30' EZ Yt Carpets 7 KALEVW BDL foe if

s LOT Me
ere ee
g oS ae eee) Ce ie
is ae fe A mis
ee a) yA 2
Bees,
I=. ce A a ee |
Sgr MO VOZZ, ee tb SN
PeceeCn | peere wag TAS
See ee eee SMI
gar ger |) a bce Aged (2A ZL eae
tant eee: LIN TL IIE
Po Sema i ae 2 TN ROS EET cig?
sy sostnmce DA TREN OES e
Skeid < es LON OS SFE EG ELEY
VE he eo i ee
oe) fi Bay NS ee Mie
ae wie) oe S, AN) fae
Ee ah SINGS nse ©) eee Aware :
Rey s kS S WASAN 2 Bees fae a ae
39°00 ih y “he MG: Zn \ NN =al : IS Uae 5 a id C | he if 39°00

L- 14

| @eetaar:) |
§ 15.35 Payments. ( a ) *Payment in full.* The NRC shall make every effort to collect a claim in full before it becomes delinquent. If a claim is paid in one lump sum after it becomes delinquent, the NRC shall impose charges for interest, penalties, and administrative costs as specified in § 15.37.
( b ) *Payment by installment.* If a debtor furnishes satisfactory evidence of inability to pay a claim in one lump sum, payment in regular installments may be arranged. Evidence may consist of a financial statement or a signed statement that the debtor's application for a loan to enable the debtor to pay the claim in full was rejected. Except for a claim described in 5 U.S.C. 5514 and codified in 10 CFR part 16, all installment payment arrangements must be in writing and require the payment of interest and administrative charges. ( 1 ) Installment note forms may be used. The written installment agreement must contain a provision accelerating the debt payment in the event the debtor defaults. If the debtor's financial statement discloses the ownership of assets which are free and clear of liens or security interests, or assets in which the debtor owns an equity, the debtor may be asked to secure the payment of an installment note by executing a Security Agreement and Financing Statement transferring to the United States a security interest in the asset until the debt is discharged.
( 2 ) If the debtor owes more than one debt, the NRC will apply the payment to the various debts in accordance with the best interests of the United States, as determined by the facts and circumstances of the particular case.
( c ) *To whom payment is made.* Payment of a debt is to be made payable to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. The payments are to be made in U.S. funds using the electronic payment methods accepted at *www.Pay.gov .* Federal agencies may also make payment by Intra Governmental Payment and Collection (IPAC). Payments should be made to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission unless payment is— ( 1 ) Made pursuant to arrangements with DOJ;
( 2 ) Ordered by a Court of the United States; or
( 3 ) Otherwise directed in any other part of this chapter.
[47 FR 7616, Feb. 22, 1982, as amended at 52 FR 31610, Aug. 21, 1987; 54 FR 53316, Dec. 28, 1989; 55 FR 32379, Aug. 9, 1990; 56 FR 51830, Oct. 16, 1991; 63 FR 15743, Apr. 1, 1998; 67 FR 30322, May 6, 2002; 89 FR 51810, June 20, 2024]
PUBLIC LAW 109–317—OCT. 11, 2006 120 STAT. 1743

Public Law 109–317

109th Congress

An Act

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to study the suitability and feasibility

of designating Castle Nugent Farms located on St. Croix, Virgin Islands, as

a unit of the National Park System, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. NATIONAL PARK SERVICE STUDY REGARDING CASTLE

NUGENT FARMS.

(a) FINDINGS.—Congress finds the following:

(1) Castle Nugent Farms, located on the southeastern shore

of St. Croix, U.S. Virgin Islands, is the largest parcel of privately-held land in the Virgin Islands and has been an operating cattle ranch for 50 years.

(2) This land has the largest and healthiest fringing coral

reef anywhere in the Virgin Islands.

(3) It consists of Caribbean dry forest and pasturelands

with considerable cultural resources including both pre-Columbian and post-European settlement.

(4) Castle Nugent Farms contains a large historic 17th

century Danish estate house that sits on over 4 miles of pristine

Caribbean oceanfront property.

(5) In addition to being an area for turtle nesting and

night heron nesting, it is the home for the Senepol cattle

breed, a unique breed of cattle that was developed on St.

Croix in the early 1900’s to adapt to the island’s climate.

(b) STUDY.—The Secretary of the Interior shall carry out a

study regarding the suitability and feasibility of designating Castle

Nugent Farms as a unit of the National Park System.

Oct. 11, 2006

[H.R. 318]

120 STAT. 1744 PUBLIC LAW 109–317—OCT. 11, 2006

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 318:

SENATE REPORTS: No. 109–241 (Comm. on Energy and Natural Resources).

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD:

Vol. 151 (2005): Nov. 15, considered and passed House.

Vol. 152 (2006): Sept. 29, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

(c) STUDY PROCESS AND COMPLETION.—Section 8(c) of Public

Law 91–383 (16 U.S.C. 1a–5(c)) shall apply to the conduct and

completion of the study required by this section.

Approved October 11, 2006.
# u"-ä*n 

# LYJ UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, 

### NC 27711



### t{AR

# I 5 2007 

### Mr. Michel Moser Plant Manager 

### Flolcim (US), Inc. I800 

### Dove Lane 

### Midlothian, 

### Texas 76065 Dear 

### Mr. Moser: OFFICE OF AIR QUALITY PLANNING AND STANDARDS



### As you are aware, the 

### U. S. 

### Environmental Protection 

### Agency (EPA) promulgated amendments to the 

### National Emissions Standards 

### for Hazardous

### Air Pollutants 

### for the Portland Cement 

### Manufacturing Industry on December 20,

### 2006. See

## 7l FR 

### 76518. These regulatiorrs contained new source standards 

### for mercury based onthe performance 

### of awet scrubber. However, due

### tothe uncertainties concerning the level 

### of scrubber performance 

### in controlling mercury, we also atthe same

### time published a notice 

### of reconsideration 

### for this new source mercury 

### standard. See

## 7l FR 76553. 

### As part

### of the reconsideration process, EPA has undertaken a program 

### to acquire 

### additional information related to emissions 

### of mercury 

### from cement 

### kilns 

### with wet scrubbers Th'is letter isto 

### confinn that

### your 

### facility has agreed to perforrn simultaneous mercury testing at the 

### inlet and outlet 

### of your wet 

### scrubber. As part 

### of this 

### effort, we

### will require pretest submission 

### of atesting 

### protocol for EPA approval. EPA 

### will prornptly review and respond to the draft 

### protocol(s) asthey are 

### received. 

### It is also our understanding that 

### you anticipate 

### submitting thetest data

### to EPA by June 30, 

### 2007. Therefore, these 

### protocols need

### to be submitted 

### in a

### timely manner

### for rcview and approval to 

### allow theJune 

### 30,2007, schedule 

### to be 

### met. Your cooperation 

### in meeting 

### this schedule is appreciated, and

### will avoid the need 

### to require the testing through more 

### formal means. 

### If any 

### of the 

### information inthis letter is incoruect, please 

### notify us

### within ten ( I0) days 

### from the receipt 

### of this letter.

lntemet Address (URL) o htþ:/1rww.epa.gov

Recyoled/Rocyclable.Prlnted wllh Vegetable OllBased lnks on Recycþd Paper (Mlnlmum 25% Posloonsumor)2



### Thankyoufor your assistance 

### in this 

### effort. '



# . Seetor 

### Policiçs and Programs 

### Division 

### cc: Catryn

### Wilson,Interim Environmental Manager, 

### Holcim (US), Inc., 

### Midlothian, 

### TX Meg Garakani, 

### Holcim (US), trnc., Waltham, 

### MA
Case 2:06-cv-00765-ID-CSC Document 9 Filed 11/28/2006 Page 1 of 1
##### 



Exhibit 10.2 2007 Award Opportunities
Annual Cash Incentive Plan The Companys Annual Cash Incentive Plan (the Plan) was approved by shareholders on April 18, 2007. A copy of the
Plan is filed as Exhibit 10.1 to this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. As contemplated by the Plan, the Compensation
Committee of the Board of Directors selected the undersigned six executive officers as participants in the Plan for
2007. The Committee selected two of the shareholder-approved performance measures for 2007 under the Planearnings per
share (weighted at 66%) and credit quality (weighted at 34%). The specific targets for the earnings per share performance measure range from a threshold ($1.76) to a maximum
($1.86). The specific targets for the credit quality performance measures are divided equally between net charge-offs
and non-performing loans to total loans and are considered confidential information; however, the Committee set the
targets at levels it believed would represent credit performance at the median or better of the Companys peer group. The cash award opportunities (expressed as a percentage of the executive officers base salary) for 2007 are as
follows: Target toLess than
    
    
    Threshold to
    
    
    below
    
    
    MaximumThreshold
    
    
    below Target
    
    
    Maximum
    
    
    or moreMichael T. Vea
    
    
    0
    
    
    
    0 - 59
    %
    
    
    60 - 99
    %
    
    
    100
    %Martin M. Zorn
    
    
    0
    
    
    
    0 - 44
    %
    
    
    45 - 79
    %
    
    
    80
    %Archie M. Brown
    
    
    0
    
    
    
    0 - 44
    %
    
    
    45 - 79
    %
    
    
    80
    %Raymond D. Beck
    
    
    0
    
    
    
    0 - 34
    %
    
    
    35 - 59
    %
    
    
    60
    %Roger M. Duncan
    
    
    0
    
    
    
    0 - 34
    %
    
    
    35 - 59
    %
    
    
    60
    %Roger D. Watson
    
    
    0
    
    
    
    0 - 34
    %
    
    
    35 - 59
    %
    
    
    60
    %
#### In the Matter of Rose Garden Restaurant Corp., Petitioner, v. Donald S. Hostetter et al., Constituting the New York State Liquor Authority, Respondents.

The order dated January 17, 1967, having been granted upon consent, respondents’ motion to vacate the stay therein contained is dismissed, without costs. Respondents’ remedy is by motion addressed to the Judge who signed the order. (CPLR 2221.) Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds, Aulisi and Gabrielli, JJ., concur.
§ 966.43 Accounting. ( a ) All funds received by the committee pursuant to the provisions of this subpart shall be used solely for the purposes specified in this part.
( b ) The Secretary may at any time require the committee, its members and alternates, employees, agents and all other persons to account for all receipts and disbursements, funds, property, or records for which they are responsible. Whenever any person ceases to be a member of the committee or alternate, he shall account to his successor, the committee, or to the person designated by the Secretary, for all receipts, disbursements, funds and property (including but not being limited to books and other records) pertaining to the committee's activities for which he is responsible, and shall execute such assignments and other instruments as may be necessary or appropriate to vest in such successor, committee, or designated person, the right to all of such property and funds and all claims vested in such person.
( c ) The committee may make recommendations to the Secretary for one or more of the members thereof, or any other person, to act as a trustee for holding records, funds, or any other committee property during periods of suspension of this subpart, or during any period or periods when regulations are not in effect and, if the Secretary determines such action appropriate, he may direct that such person or persons shall act as trustee or trustees for the committee.