alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 12.1

Certification by the Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Pierre Vareille, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Constellium N.V. (the Company);

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The Companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls
and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) [Paragraph omitted in accordance with Exchange
Act Rule 13a-14(a)];

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this
report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the Companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period
covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting;

5. The Companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the Companys auditors and the audit committee of the Companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which
are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Companys
internal control over financial reporting.

Date: April 22, 2014



|    |  |                     |  |                        
|--- |  | ------------------- |  | -----------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Pierre Vareille
|    |  | Name:               |  | Pierre Vareille        
|    |  | Title:              |  | Chief Executive Officer
Editorial Note on Part 4
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 4 appear at 77 FR 39904, July 6, 2012.

§ 4.312 Definitions of “normal operation” and “statutory objective”. For purposes of §§ 4.313 and 4.314, the terms “normal operation” and “statutory objective” have the following meaning: ( a ) *Normal operation* means the operation of a program or activity without significant changes that would impair its ability to meet its objectives.
( b ) *Statutory objective* means any purposes of a program or activity expressly stated in any Federal statute State statute, or local statute or ordinance adopted by an elected general purpose legislative body.
Editorial Note on Part 4
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 4 appear at 77 FR 39904, July 6, 2012.

§ 4.101 Definitions. As used in this subpart: ( a ) *Disabled person* means any person who has a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or more major life activities, has a record of such an impairment, or is regarded as having such an impairment. Such term does not include any individual who is an alcoholic or drug abuser whose current use of alcohol or drugs prevents such individual from performing the duties of the job in question or whose employment, by reason of such current alcohol or drug abuse, would constitute a direct threat to property or the safety of others.
( b ) As used in paragraph (a) of this section, the phrase: ( 1 ) *Physical or mental impairment* means: ( i ) Any physiological disorder or condition, cosmetic disfigurement, or anatomical loss affecting one or more of the following body systems: Neurological; musculoskeletal; special sense organs; respiratory, including speech organs; cardiovascular; reproductive; digestive, genitourinary; hemic and lymphatic; skin; and endocrine; or
( ii ) any mental or psychological disorder, such as mental retardation, organic brain syndrome, emotional or mental illness, and specific learning disabilities. The term *physical or mental impairment* includes, but is not limited to, such diseases and conditions as orthopedic, visual, speech, and hearing impairments, cerebral palsy, epilepsy, muscular dystrophy, multiple sclerosis, cancer, heart disease, diabetes, mental retardation, and emotional illness.
( 2 ) *Major life activities* means functions such as caring for one's self, performing manual tasks, walking, seeing, hearing, speaking, breathing, learning, and working.
( 3 ) *Has a record of such an impairment* means has a history of, or has been misclassified as having, a mental or physical impairment that substantially limits one or more major life activities.
( 4 ) *Is regarded as having an impairment* means: ( i ) Has a physical or mental impairment that does not substantially limit major life activities but is treated by a recipient as constituting such a limitation;
( ii ) Has a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits major life activities only as a result of the attitudes of others toward such impairment; or
( iii ) Does not have a physical or mental impairment but is treated by a recipient as having such an impairment.
( c ) *Qualified disabled person* means: ( 1 ) With respect to employment, a disabled person who, with reasonable accommodation, can perform essential functions of the job in question and
( 2 ) with respect to services, a disabled person who meets the essential eligibility requirements for the receipt of such services.
( d ) *Section 504* means section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, Pub. L. 93-112, as amended by the Rehabilitation, Comprehensive Services, and Developmental Disabilities Amendments of 1978, Pub. L. 95-602 (29 U.S.C. 794).
28.307-1 Group insurance plans.

(a) Submit insurance policies under the Defense Department Group Term Insurance Plan to the

cognizant Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA) office for approval.

Parent topic: 28.307 Insurance under cost–reimbursement contracts.
#### State Bank of Albany, Respondent, v. Richard B. Murray, Appellant.

Gibson, P. J.

Appeal by defendant from an order of the Supreme Court which denied his motion to be relieved of a judgment entered against him upon his default in appearing and to be permitted to appear, answer or move with respect to the complaint, in an action to recover the amount allegedly due upon a retail installment contract for the sale and purchase of an automobile. Attached to the moving papers is a purported certificate of defendant’s birth on July 30, 1945. The answering affidavit alleges that a school record indicates his date of birth as July 1, 1944 and that an employment record sets forth the date as July 31, 1945. The contract was dated October 13, 1965; about two months later defendant surrendered the automobile to the dealer, in the presence of a representative of the plaintiff, the dealer’s assignee; on March 2, 1966, this action was commenced by service of a summons; on April 1, 1966, judgment was entered upon defendant’s default in appearing; and on June 7, 1966, the motion to be relieved was made, by order to show cause dated that day. *628If defendant was born on July 30, 1945, he was, of course, an infant on the date of the contract and on the date of the service of the summons and the date of the entry of the judgment as well. In such ease his infancy, pleaded in his proposed answer submitted on the motion, constituted a meritorious defense to the action. *(Sternlieb*v. *Normandie Nat. Sec. Corp.,*263 N. Y. 245; *International Text Book Co.*v. *Connelly,*206 N. Y. 188; 28 N. Y. Jur., Infants, § 44.) In such case, also, service of the summons upon the infant alone was insufficient (CPLR 309, subd. [a]); his representation by a guardian ad litem or one of the other persons indicated by the statute was required (CPLR 1201, 1202); and judgment could not be entered against him by default except after appearance by his representative or the expiration of 20 days from the appointment of a guardian ad litem (CPLR 1203). There is no indication that any of these requirements were met and although the failure of compliance therewith is not specifically averred as a ground of the application, a judgment thus entered would be not merely voidable but void *(Ingersoll*v. *Mangam,*84 N. Y. 622, 625; *Matter of Spring,*280 App. Div. 642) and we are not at liberty to overlook the jurisdictional defect in such ease existing. However, in view of whatever issue there may be as to defendant’s age, the motion should be remitted to the Special Term for determination of that issue after opportunity to the parties to produce further proof should they, or either of them,' be so advised. Order reversed, on the law and the facts, and matter remitted to Special Term, without costs. Reynolds, Staley, Jr., and Brink, JJ., concur with Gibson, P. J.
Case 1:06-cv-00786-MHT-CSC Document 4 Filed 09/06/2006 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:06-cv-00786-MHT-CSC Document 4 Filed 09/06/2006 Page 2 of 2
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Intervoice, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended November 30, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
David W. Brandenburg, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
|-- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|  
|2. |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Date: January 14, 2004

/s/ David W. BrandenburgDavid W. BrandenburgChief Executive Officer and Chairman
#### HORWITZ v. UNITED FIREMEN’S INS. CO. OF PHILADELPHIA. SAME v. NORTH BRITISH & MERCANTILE INS. CO. OF LONDON & EDINBURGH. SAME v. EQUITABLE FIRE & MARINE INS. CO.

(Nos. 6077-6079.)

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

June 19, 1914.)

Appeal from Special Term, New York County. Separate actions by Charles Horwitz against the United Firemen’s Insurance Company of Philadelphia, against the North British & Mercantile Insurance Company of London & Edinburgh, and against the Equitable Fire & Marine Insurance Company. Plaintiff’s motion for bills of particulars granted, and defendants appeal. Modified and affirmed.

Leo Levy, of New York City, for appellants.

Otto C. Sommerich, of New York City, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Subdivision 4 of the notice of motion was entirely unnecessary, considering the other clauses of the order as to which the defendants were required to give particulars. The orders are modified, by striking out the fourth demand for particulars, and, as so modified, affirmed, without costs.
120 STAT. 1868 PUBLIC LAW 109–343—OCT. 13, 2006

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 2322:

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 152 (2006):

Sept. 27, considered and passed House.

Sept. 29, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 109–343

109th Congress

An Act

To designate the Federal building located at 320 North Main Street in McAllen,

Texas, as the ‘‘Kika de la Garza Federal Building’’.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION.

The Federal building located at 320 North Main Street in

McAllen, Texas, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Kika de

la Garza Federal Building’’.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper,

or other record of the United States to the Federal building referred

to in section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Kika

de la Garza Federal Building’’.

Approved October 13, 2006.

Oct. 13, 2006

[H.R. 2322]
§ 97.108 Amendments after final action. ( a ) After a final denial by the Commissioner, amendments to the application may be made to overcome the reason or reasons for denial. The acceptance or refusal of any such amendment by the Office and any proceedings relative thereto shall not relieve the applicant from the time limit set for an appeal or an abandonment for failure to reply.
( b ) No amendment of the application can be made in an appeal proceeding. After decision on appeal, amendments can only be made in accordance with the decision.
[58 FR 42435, Aug. 9, 1993, as amended at 70 FR 28785, May 19, 2005]
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0000761236
<NAME>                        NATIONAL PROPERTIES INVESTMENT TRUST


<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              12/31/1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 7/1/1999
<PERIOD-END>                                  9/30/1999
<CASH>                                         65,174
<SECURITIES>                                        0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                        0
<INVENTORY>                                         0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                    0
<PP&E>                                          6,545
<DEPRECIATION>                                  4,233
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 67,486
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          11,807
<BONDS>                                             0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                            0
<OTHER-SE>                                 11,790,407
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   67,486
<SALES>                                             0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                    0
<CGS>                                               0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     0
<INCOME-TAX>                                        0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 0
<DISCONTINUED>                                ( 3,623)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                  ( 3,623)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.00)



</TABLE>
#### § 993.10 Standard prunes.

*Standard prunes* means any lot of natural condition prunes meeting the applicable grade and size standards prescribed pursuant to § 993.49 other than pursuant to § 993.49(c).

[26 FR 476, Jan. 19, 1961, as amended at 37 FR 861, Jan. 20, 1972]
#### § 160.1 Purpose.

The regulations in this part are issued for the protection and security of facilities, installations and real property subject to the proprietory jurisdiction or administration, or in the custody of, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

[28 FR 8400, Aug. 16, 1963, as amended at 40 FR 8794, Mar. 3, 1975]
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

vs. ) CR. NO. 1:06cr170-WHA

ROY DALE WALLACE )

ORDER

This case is before the court on the Motion to Continue Sentencing (Doc. #261), filed by

the Defendant on December 18, 2006. While the document is entitled "Motion to Continue

Sentencing", it is actually a motion to continue the trial date.

Upon consideration of the motion, the court is willing to grant some continuance, but not

of the length requested. Accordingly, the court finds, for the reason that additional time is

needed to reach a satisfactory plea agreement, the ends of justice to be served by granting the

continuance outweigh the rights of the Defendant and the public to a speedy trial. Therefore, the

motion is GRANTED to the following extent:

It is hereby ORDERED that the trial of the Defendant is CONTINUED from the term of

court commencing January 8, 2007, to the term of court commencing February 5, 2007.

DONE this 18th day of December, 2006.

 /s/ W. Harold Albritton 

W. HAROLD ALBRITTON

SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 1:06-cr-00170-WHA-CSC Document 262 Filed 12/18/2006 Page 1 of 1
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank Control Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and § 225.41 of the Board's Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the notices are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).

The notices are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank indicated. The notices also will be available for inspection at the offices of the Board of Governors. Interested persons may express their views in writing to the Reserve Bank indicated for that notice or to the offices of the Board of Governors. Comments must be received not later than January 3, 2011.

A. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (Dennis Denney, Assistant Vice President) 1 Memorial Drive, Kansas City, Missouri 64198-0001:

                    1.                     *Jeffrey J. Heiman and Jerod J. Heiman,*                     both of Wichita, Kansas; to retain control of Norcon Financial Corp., and thereby indirectly retain control of Conway Bank, National Association, both in Conway Springs, Kansas.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, December 13, 2010.

Robert deV. Frierson,

Deputy Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2010-31618 Filed 12-15-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6210-01-P
Case 2:06-cv-00739-LES-CSC Document 2 Filed 08/16/2006 Page 1 of 5Case 2:06-cv-00739-LES-CSC Document 2 Filed 08/16/2006 Page 2 of 5Case 2:06-cv-00739-LES-CSC Document 2 Filed 08/16/2006 Page 3 of 5Case 2:06-cv-00739-LES-CSC Document 2 Filed 08/16/2006 Page 4 of 5Case 2:06-cv-00739-LES-CSC Document 2 Filed 08/16/2006 Page 5 of 5
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 240 (Wednesday, December 15, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 78335-78336]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-31499]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 7268]


Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Thomas Lawrence: Regency Power and Brilliance''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and

[[Page 78336]]

Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 
note, et seq.), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and 
Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 of August 28, 2000, I hereby 
determine that the objects to be included in the exhibition ``Thomas 
Lawrence: Regency Power and Brilliance,'' imported from abroad for 
temporary exhibition within the United States, are of cultural 
significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan agreements with 
the foreign owners or custodians. I also determine that the exhibition 
or display of the exhibit objects at the Yale Center for British Art, 
New Haven, CT, from on or about February 24, 2011, until on or about 
June 5, 2011, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to 
be determined, is in the national interest. Public Notice of these 
Determinations is ordered to be published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Carol B. Epstein, Attorney-
Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State 
(telephone: 202/632-6473). The address is U.S. Department of State, SA-
5, L/PD, Fifth Floor, Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: December 7, 2010.
Ann Stock,
Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, 
Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2010-31499 Filed 12-14-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA
No. 312 A 1 7
Filed 6 April 2018 VOGLER REYNOLDA ROAD, LLC

v. SCI NORTH CAROLINA FUNERAL SERVICES, INC.

Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A

- 2 7(a) (2) from a n opinion and final judgment entered on 3 April 2017 by Judge James L. Gale , Chief Special Superior Court Judge for Complex Business Cases , in Superior Court, Forsyth County, after the case was designated a mandatory complex business case by the Chief Justice pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A

- 45.4 (b)

. Heard in the Supreme Court on 14 March 2018

.
Ward and Smith, P.A., by John M. Martin , for plaintiff

- appellee

. Moore & Van Al len PLLC , by Anthony T. Lathrop and Glenn E. Ketner, III, for defendant

- appellant

.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.