alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Editorial Note on Part 2
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

§ 2.1208 Process and schedule for a hearing consisting of written presentations. ( a ) Unless otherwise limited by this subpart or by the presiding officer, participants in a hearing consisting of written presentations may submit: ( 1 ) Initial written statements of position and written testimony with supporting affidavits on the admitted contentions. These materials must be filed on the dates set by the presiding officer;
( 2 ) Written responses, rebuttal testimony with supporting affidavits directed to the initial statements and testimony of witnesses and other participants, and proposed written questions for the presiding officer to consider for submission to the persons sponsoring testimony under paragraph (a)(1) of this section. These materials must be filed within twenty (20) days of the service of the materials submitted under paragraph (a)(1) of this section unless the presiding officer directs otherwise;
( 3 ) Written questions on the written responses and rebuttal testimony submitted under paragraph (a)(2) of this section, which the presiding officer may, in his or her discretion, require the persons offering the written responses and rebuttal testimony to provide responses. These questions must be filed within seven (7) days of service of the materials submitted under paragraph (a)(2) of this section unless the presiding officer directs otherwise; and
( 4 ) Written concluding statements of position on the contentions. These statements shall be filed within twenty (20) days of the service of written responses to the presiding officer's questions to the participants or, in the absence of questions from the presiding officer, within twenty (20) days of the service of the materials submitted under paragraph (a)(2) of this section unless the presiding officer directs otherwise.
( b ) The presiding officer may formulate and submit written questions to the participants that he or she considers appropriate to develop an adequate record.
SUBPART 34.71  – COST AND SOFTWARE DATA REPORTING    *(Revised June 10, 2020 through PROCLTR 2020-05)* **Parent topic:** PART 34 – MAJOR SYSTEM ACQUISITION34.7101 Solicitation provision and contract clause.    (a)(S-90) Cost and Software Data Reporting (CSDR) requirements apply to sustainment solicitations and contracts/subcontracts that supports Major Defense Acquisition Programs and Major Automated Information Systems over $50 million, regardless of contract type, in accordance with DoD Manual 5000.04-M-1, Cost and Software Data Reporting (CSDR) Manual, and DoD Instruction 5000.73, Cost Analysis Guidance and Procedures. If CSDR requirements apply to a DLA acquisition, the contracting officer shall coordinate the Request for Proposal (RFP) CSDR plan content and negotiation with the responsible Program Management Office (PMO). Procuring organizations shall submit their proposed RFP plan, or a request for waiver (see 34.7101(a)(S-91), to DLA Acquisition Pricing at least 70 days prior to the estimated RFP release date. DLA Acquisition Pricing will review the proposed RFP plan or request for waiver and forward it to the Deputy Director, Cost Assessment (DDCA), Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD) for final approval within 60 days of the RFP release date. After negotiations and award, procuring organizations shall forward final CSDR plans to DLA Acquisition Pricing within 30 days from date for award for submission to OSD. The Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation (OSD CAPE) Office maintains polices and guidance concerning CSDR requirements at Cost Assessment Data Enterprise (CADE) Cost and Sortware Data Reporting (CSDR) Policies (https://cade.osd.mil/policy/csdr-timeline).       (S-91) In accordance with DoD Manual 5000.04-M-1, DDCA has the authority to approve waivers for CSDR requirements. Procuring organizations shall forward requests for waivers to DLA Acquisition Pricing, accompanied by—       (i) For commercial acquisitions, a copy of the commercial item determination and a memorandum supporting the rationale for a waiver based on commerciality, both signed by the contracting officer; or       (ii) For competitive acquisitions, documentation supporting the basis for the contracting officer’s determination that adequate competition will continue to exist.
### Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA

- Directorate Identifier:

- AD If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If they do not, click (or Tab) into and then ou t of the changed cell

. **Estimated Costs:**  Action (e.g., Inspection, replacement) Do not include on

condition costs here Costs per **Product** (e.g., aircraft, engine,

propeller, appliance) Work

- h ours (include access, testing, and close

- up) Labor

cost ( @ $8 5 /h our) Part s Cost Total Costs ( labor + parts) Number of

**U.S. Registered**  **Products** Total Cost

for U

. S

. Fleet
Inspection 13.0 $1,105.0 0 $0 $1,105.00 502 $554,710.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 

### The known number of products in compl iance: 4 

### Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $554,710 

### Costs covered under warranty ( if known ) $ 0
**On**
**- Condition Costs**  **:** Action (e.g., Inspection, replacement) Work

- h ours

(include access, testing, and close

up) Labor cost

( @ $8 5 /hour) Parts Cost Cost per Product

Splice Repair 93.0 $7,905.00 $17,759 $25,664.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00 

### Special considerations for Economic Analysis ( Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be us ed to explain warranty costs) 

### :

### Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”? YES * NO

* Explanation: **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:** Is the AD significant? YES * NO

* Explanation: **Regulatory F lexibility Act:**  Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? E xplain for either a Yes or No answer. YES NO Explanation: **Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:** This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? YES * NO


### * Explanation 

### :
IV 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 177 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that Sugar Ray Robinson should be recognized for his athletic achievements and commitment 

to young people. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 17, 2005 

Mr. RANGEL submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Government Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that 

Sugar Ray Robinson should be recognized for his athletic 

achievements and commitment to young people. 

Whereas Sugar Ray Robinson was born in Detroit, Michigan, 

on May 3, 1920; 

Whereas, in 1932, Robinson moved to New York City where 

he started boxing as an amateur, going undefeated in 89 

bouts, and winning the Golden Gloves featherweight title 

in 1939; 

Whereas, in 1940, he began boxing professionally and fought 

at New York City’s Madison Square Garden for the first 

time; 
2 

•HRES 177 IH 

Whereas, in 1946, he won his first world title as a 

welterweight, and then held the middleweight title for 5 

years between 1951 and 1960; 

Whereas after retiring for a time he returned to box a series 

of exciting matches before permanently retiring on December 10, 1965; 

Whereas in a career spanning 25 years, he won 175 of 202 

bouts with 109 knockouts; 

Whereas his grace, speed, power, and mastery of the ring 

earned him international acclaim as one of the greatest 

fighters in boxing history; 

Whereas Sugar Ray Robinson was elected into the Boxing 

Hall of Fame in 1967; 

Whereas, in 1969, he established the Sugar Ray Robinson 

Youth Foundation; and 

Whereas Sugar Ray Robinson died in Culver City, California, 

on April 12, 1989, at the age of 68: Now, therefore, be 

it 

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that Sugar Ray Robinson should be recog3 nized as one of history’s greatest professional boxers, 

4 whose dedication to boxing and commitment to young peo5 ple have earned him a permanent place in sports history. 

Æ
3002.270 Abbreviations.       CBCA Civilian Board of Contract Appeals          CFO Chief Financial Officer          CIO Chief Information Officer          COCO Chief of the Contracting Office          COR Contracting Officer's Representative          CPO Chief Procurement Officer          D&F Determination and Findings          FOIA Freedom of Information Act          HCA Head of the Contracting Activity          J&A Justification and Approval for Other than Full and Open Competition          MD Management Directive          OCPO Office of the Chief Procurement Officer          OIG Office of the Inspector General          OSDBU Office of Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization          PCR SBA's Procurement Center Representative          RFP Request for Proposal          SBA Small Business Administration          SBS Small Business Specialist          SPE Senior Procurement Executive    **Parent topic:** Subpart 3002.2—Abbreviations
642.1503-70 Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS).       (a) The Department of State subscribes to the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) maintained at *http://www.cpars.gov/.* CPARS is an Internet-based tool allowing government activities to input past performance information. This information is uploaded by CPARS into the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS).          (b) All DOS contracting officers shall evaluate contractors' past performance as required by FAR 42.1502 and 42.1503.          (c) All Terminations for Default and Terminations for Cause shall be entered into CPARS regardless of contract purpose or dollar value.          (d) Heads of contracting activities shall send a list of the names, work addresses, and phone numbers of all acquisition personnel whom they wish to have access to the CPARS to *AQMCPARS@state.gov.*    **Parent topic:** Subpart 642.15—Contractor Performance Information
Case 1:06-cr-00170-WHA-CSC Document 154 Filed 09/11/2006 Page 1 of 1
# Subpart 2839.1 - General

**Parent topic:**PART 2839 - ACQUISITION OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY

## 2839.101 Policy.

DOJ's Chief Information Officer (CIO) and SPE are responsible for issuing policies and procedures to manage the agency information technology (IT) acquisition process.     

## 2839.102 Management of risk.

Contracts involving DOJ Information and Information Systems shall comply with the security requirements prescribed in FAR 39.102 and all applicable DOJ security requirements, including without limitation all DOJ Policy Statements and DOJ Policy Instructions established under the DOJ Acquisition Management Order relating to the Management of Risk of DOJ Information and Information Systems.
Case 2:06-cv-00755-MHT-CSC Document 49 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 1 of 45
Case 2:06-cv-00755-MHT-CSC Document 49 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 2 of 45
Case 2:06-cv-00755-MHT-CSC Document 49 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 3 of 45
Case 2:06-cv-00755-MHT-CSC Document 49 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 4 of 45
Case 2:06-cv-00755-MHT-CSC Document 49 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 5 of 45
Case 2:06-cv-00755-MHT-CSC Document 49 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 6 of 45
Case 2:06-cv-00755-MHT-CSC Document 49 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 7 of 45
Case 2:06-cv-00755-MHT-CSC Document 49 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 8 of 45
Case 2:06-cv-00755-MHT-CSC Document 49 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 9 of 45
Case 2:06-cv-00755-MHT-CSC Document 49 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 10 of 45
Case 2:06-cv-00755-MHT-CSC Document 49 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 11 of 45
Case 2:06-cv-00755-MHT-CSC Document 49 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 12 of 45
Case 2:06-cv-00755-MHT-CSC Document 49 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 13 of 45
Case 2:06-cv-00755-MHT-CSC Document 49 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 14 of 45
Case 2:06-cv-00755-MHT-CSC Document 49 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 15 of 45
Case 2:06-cv-00755-MHT-CSC Document 49 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 16 of 45
Case 2:06-cv-00755-MHT-CSC Document 49 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 17 of 45
Case 2:06-cv-00755-MHT-CSC Document 49 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 18 of 45
Case 2:06-cv-00755-MHT-CSC Document 49 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 19 of 45
Case 2:06-cv-00755-MHT-CSC Document 49 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 20 of 45
Case 2:06-cv-00755-MHT-CSC Document 49 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 21 of 45
Case 2:06-cv-00755-MHT-CSC Document 49 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 22 of 45
Case 2:06-cv-00755-MHT-CSC Document 49 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 23 of 45
Case 2:06-cv-00755-MHT-CSC Document 49 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 24 of 45
Case 2:06-cv-00755-MHT-CSC Document 49 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 25 of 45
Case 2:06-cv-00755-MHT-CSC Document 49 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 26 of 45
Case 2:06-cv-00755-MHT-CSC Document 49 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 27 of 45
Case 2:06-cv-00755-MHT-CSC Document 49 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 28 of 45
Case 2:06-cv-00755-MHT-CSC Document 49 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 29 of 45
Case 2:06-cv-00755-MHT-CSC Document 49 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 30 of 45
Case 2:06-cv-00755-MHT-CSC Document 49 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 31 of 45
Case 2:06-cv-00755-MHT-CSC Document 49 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 32 of 45
Case 2:06-cv-00755-MHT-CSC Document 49 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 33 of 45
Case 2:06-cv-00755-MHT-CSC Document 49 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 34 of 45
Case 2:06-cv-00755-MHT-CSC Document 49 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 35 of 45
Case 2:06-cv-00755-MHT-CSC Document 49 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 36 of 45
Case 2:06-cv-00755-MHT-CSC Document 49 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 37 of 45
Case 2:06-cv-00755-MHT-CSC Document 49 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 38 of 45
Case 2:06-cv-00755-MHT-CSC Document 49 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 39 of 45
Case 2:06-cv-00755-MHT-CSC Document 49 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 40 of 45
Case 2:06-cv-00755-MHT-CSC Document 49 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 41 of 45
Case 2:06-cv-00755-MHT-CSC Document 49 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 42 of 45
Case 2:06-cv-00755-MHT-CSC Document 49 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 43 of 45
Case 2:06-cv-00755-MHT-CSC Document 49 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 44 of 45
Case 2:06-cv-00755-MHT-CSC Document 49 Filed 07/27/2007 Page 45 of 45
Subpart 1809.1—Responsible Prospective Contractors    **Parent topic:** PART 1809—CONTRACTOR QUALIFICATIONS1809.104-4 Subcontractor responsibility.       Generally, the Canadian Commercial Corporation's (CCC) proposal of a firm as its subcontractor is sufficient basis for an affirmative determination of responsibility. However, when the CCC determination of responsibility is not consistent with other information available to the contracting office, the contracting officer shall request from the CCC and any other sources whatever information is necessary to make the responsibility determination.          Upon request, CCC shall be furnished the rationale for any subsequent determination of nonresponsibility.1809.105-2 Determinations and documentation.       (a) The contracting officer shall provide written notification to a prospective contractor determined not responsible, which includes the basis for the determination. Notification provides the prospective contractor with the opportunity to take corrective action prior to future solicitations.
Subpart 2110.70 - Contract Specifications    **Parent topic:** PART 2110 - SPECIFICATIONS, STANDARDS, AND OTHER PURCHASE DESCRIPTIONS2110.7000 Scope of subpart.       This subpart prescribes mandatory specifications for performance under FEGLI Program contracts.2110.7001 Definitions.       *Investment income,* as used in this subpart, means the net amount on an investment of FEGLI Program funds earned by the contractor after deducting reasonable, necessary, and properly allocated investment expenses.          *Significant event,* as used in this subpart, means any occurrence or anticipated occurrence that might reasonably be expected to have a material effect upon the contractor's ability to meet its obligations under the LIFAR.2110.7002 Contractor investment of FEGLI Program funds.       (a) The Contractor is required to invest and reinvest all FEGLI Program funds on hand, including any attributable to the special contingency reserve (as used in 5 U.S.C. 8712), until needed to discharge promptly the obligations incurred under the contract. Within the constraints of safety and liquidity of investments, the Contractor must seek to maximize investment income. However, the Contractor will not be responsible for any actions taken at the direction of OPM.          (b) The Contractor is required to credit income earned from its investment of FEGLI Program funds to the FEGLI Program. Thus, the Contractor must be able to allocate investment income to the FEGLI Program in an appropriate manner. If the Contractor fails to invest funds on hand, properly allocate investment income, or credit any income due to the contract, for whatever reason, it must return or credit any investment income lost to OPM or the FEGLI Program, retroactive to the date that such funds should have been originally invested, allocated, or credited in accordance with the clause at 2152.210-70 of this chapter.2110.7003 Significant events.       The contractor is required to inform the contracting officer of all significant events.2110.7004 Contract clauses.       (a) The clause at 2152.210-70 shall be inserted in all FEGLI Program contracts.          (b) The clause at 2152.210-71 shall be inserted in all FEGLI Program contracts.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 265 Engrossed in House (EH)]

H. Res. 265

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                          June 6, 2006.
Whereas osteoporosis, a disease characterized by low bone mass, structural 
        deterioration of bone, and increased susceptibility to fractures, is a 
        public health threat for an estimated 44 million Americans;
Whereas in the United States, 10 million individuals already have the disease 
        and almost 34 million more are estimated to have low bone mass, placing 
        them at increased risk for osteoporosis;
Whereas one in two women and one in four men over age 50 will have an 
        osteoporosis-related fracture in her or his remaining lifetime;
Whereas building strong bones during childhood and adolescence can be the best 
        defense against developing osteoporosis later;
Whereas osteoporosis is often thought of as an older person's disease, but bone 
        health is a concern for any age;
Whereas substantial risk has been reported in people of all ethnic backgrounds;
Whereas osteoporosis is responsible for more than 1.5 million fractures 
        annually;
Whereas the Surgeon General of the Public Health Service says that caring for 
        bone fractures from osteoporosis costs America $18 billion annually;
Whereas the Surgeon General believes that bone health is critically important to 
        the overall health and quality of the life of Americans; that it is in 
        jeopardy and will only get worse if left unchecked; and that great 
        improvements in the bone health status of Americans can be made by 
        applying what is already known about early prevention, assessment, 
        diagnosis, and treatment;
Whereas optimum bone health and prevention of osteoporosis can be maximized by a 
        balanced diet rich in calcium and vitamin D; weight-bearing exercise; 
        and a healthy lifestyle with no smoking or excessive alcohol intake; and
Whereas May 2006 would be an appropriate month to observe National Osteoporosis 
        Awareness and Prevention Month: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives supports the goals and ideals of 
National Osteoporosis Awareness and Prevention Month and urges the people of the 
United States to observe appropriate programs and activities with respect to 
osteoporosis, including talking with their health care professionals about their 
bone health.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
```
§ 217.91 Records and reports. ( a ) Persons are required to make and preserve for at least three years, accurate and complete records of any transaction covered by this part or an official action.
( b ) Records must be maintained in sufficient detail to permit the determination, upon examination, of whether each transaction complies with the provisions of this part or any official action. However, this part does not specify any particular method or system to be used.
( c ) Records required to be maintained by this part must be made available for examination on demand by duly authorized representatives of the Department of Energy as provided in § 217.71.
( d ) In addition, persons must develop, maintain, and submit any other records and reports to the Department of Energy that may be required for the administration of the Defense Production Act and other applicable statutes, and this part.
( e ) Section 705(d) of the Defense Production Act, as implemented by E.O. 12919, provides that information obtained under this section which the Secretary deems confidential, or with reference to which a request for confidential treatment is made by the person furnishing such information, shall not be published or disclosed unless the Secretary determines that the withholding of this information is contrary to the interest of the national defense. Information required to be submitted to the Department of Energy in connection with the enforcement or administration of the Defense Production Act, this part, or an official action, is deemed to be confidential under section 705(d) of the Defense Production Act and shall be handled in accordance with applicable Federal law.