alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(logo)Prudential

**PrudentialAsset Resources**

PrudentialMortgage Capital Company

2100Ross Avenue, Suite 2500, Dallas TX 75201

Tel214-777-4500

Abusiness of Prudential Financial, Inc.

 

 

WellsFargo Bank, National Association

CommercialMortgage Servicing

MACD1086

550South Tryon Street, 14th Floor

Charlotte,North Carolina 28202

Attention:Asset Manager

 

RE:**WFRBS 2012-Cl0**

Period:**January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2017(the "Reporting Period")**

 

**Annual ComplianceStatement**

 

I,Joni Brown-Haas, in my capacity as President and Managing Director ofPrudential Asset Resources, Inc. (the "Company") hereby certify withregard to the Company's role as Sub-Servicer under the Sub-Servicing Agreement,(the "Agreement") dated as of December 1,2012, pertaining to theabove-referenced certificates, that:

 

(i)           a review of the activities of the Company under the Agreement  during theperiod noted above, and  of the performance of the Company under theAgreement during the reporting period has been made under my supervision, and

 

(ii)          to the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Company has fulfilledall its obligations under the Agreement throughout the reporting period, and

 

(iii)         to the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Company has fulfilledits obligations under its sub-servicing agreement in all materialrespects, and

 

(iv)         the Company has maintained an effective internal control system over the servicingof mortgage loans including the Loans serviced by the Company, and

 

(v)          the Company has not received any notice regarding qualification, or challengingthe status of the Lower Tier REMIC or the Upper Tier REMIC as a REMIC, from theIRS or any other governmental agency or body.

 

Effectiveas of 2/22/2018

 

 

/s/JoniBrown-Haas

JoniBrown-Hass

Presidentand Managing Director

PrudentialAsset Resources, Inc.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

ENCORE COMPUTER CORPORATION

Computation of Income (Loss) per Share                           Exhibit No. 11
(unaudited)
(in thousands except per share data)

                                   Three Months Ended        Nine Months Ended
                                  Sept 27,   Sept 28,       Sept 27,   Sept 28,
Basic                               1998       1997           1998       1997
<S>                               <C>       <C>            <C>        <C> 
Net income (loss)                 $ -1,726  $ -16,638      $  21,252  $ -56,465

Series B, D, E, F, G, H and 
 I accumulated
 Preferred Stock Dividends               0     -7,672              0    -21,794

Net income (loss) attributable
 to common shareholders           $ -1,726  $ -24,310     $   21,252  $ -78,259

Weighted average common
 shares outstanding                 67,451     37,560         67,449     37,419

Basic income (loss) per share        -0.03      -0.65           0.32      -2.09

Diluted

Net income (loss)                 $ -1,726  $ -16,638     $   21,252  $ -56,465

Wghtd avg common shares outstand    67,451     37,560         67,449     37,419
Series A assumed converted               0      7,364              0      7,364
Series B assumed converted              42     24,096             14     23,745
Series D assumed converted              68     36,871             23     36,334
Series E assumed converted              69     37,688             23     37,140
Series F assumed converted              32     17,635             11     17,378
Series G assumed converted              35     18,924             12     18,648
Series H assumed converted              21     11,573              7     11,405
Series I assumed converted              10     12,555              3      8,920
Exercise of options reduced by
 the number of shares purchased
 with proceeds                           0          0              0          0
Weighted average common
 shares outstanding                 67,728    204,266         67,542    198,353

Diluted income (loss) per share      -0.03      -0.65           0.32      -2.09

</TABLE>
Basic and diluted income (loss) per common share are the same for all periods
  presented because the effect of the common stock equivalents would be
  antidilutive.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-51040 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus RAFAEL LUCERO-SALAS, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. EP-01-CR-1019-ALL-DB

-------------------- April 11, 2002 Before SMITH, DeMOSS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Rafael Lucero-Salas appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United States after deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Lucero-Salas contends that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) define separate offenses. He argues that the aggravated felony conviction that resulted in his increased sentence is an element of the offense under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) that should have been alleged in his indictment. Lucero-Salas maintains that he pleaded guilty to an indictment which charged only simple reentryNo. 01-51040 -2- under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). He argues that his sentence exceeds the two-year maximum term of imprisonment which may be imposed for that offense.
In Almendarez-Torres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), the Supreme Court held that the enhanced penalties in 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) are sentencing provisions, not elements of separate offenses. The Court further held that the sentencing provisions do not violate the Due Process Clause. Id. at 239-47. Lucero-Salas acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres , but asserts that the decision has been cast into doubt by Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). He seeks to preserve his argument for further review. Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres

. See Apprendi , 530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit , 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000), cert. denied , 531 U.S. 1202 (2001). This court must follow Almendarez-Torres “unless and until the Supreme Court itself determines to overrule it.” Dabeit , 231 F.3d at 984 (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. The Government has moved for a summary affirmance in lieu of filing an appellee’s brief. In its motion, the Government asks that the judgment of the district court be affirmed and that an appellee’s brief not be required. The motion is GRANTED. AFFIRMED; MOTION GRANTED.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Cavendish Futures Fund LLC (the “Fund”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jerry Pascucci, President and Director of Sydling Futures Management LLC, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Fund.

 

 
| /s/ Jerry Pascucci             |   |
|--------------------------------|--------|
| Jerry Pascucci                 |   |
| Sydling Futures Management LLC |   |
| President and Director         |   |

 
| Date: January 13, 2017 |   |
|------------------------|--------|

 

----
# Subpart 1846.1—General

**Parent topic:**PART 1846—QUALITY ASSURANCE

## 1846.102 Policy.

(f) See NPR 8735.2, Section 2.1, concerning quality assurance for critical acquisition items. Generally, the quality assurance requirements set forth in the NPR for critical acquisition items are not allowed under part 12 procedures. See FAR 12.208.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 98-40136

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

RANDY EARNEST TODD,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. G-97-CR-1

- - - - - - - - - -

December 9, 1998

Before DAVIS, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Randy Earnest Todd appeals from his conviction and resultant

sentence for being a felon in possession of a firearm. He argues

that the district court failed to comply with the dictates of

Fed. R. Crim. P. 11, that his guilty plea was not knowingly and

voluntarily entered, and that the district court clearly erred by

determining that one of the firearms he possessed was stolen. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                             5
<LEGEND>
This schedule  contains summary  financial  information  extracted from National
Housing Partnership Realty Fund II 2000 Third Quarter 10-QSB and is qualified in
its entirety by reference to such 10-QSB filing.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                0000762859
<NAME>                               National Housing Partnership Realty Fund II
<MULTIPLIER>                                              1,000

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                         9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                     DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                        JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                                        0
<SECURITIES>                                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                 0
<ALLOWANCES>                                                  0
<INVENTORY>                                                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                              0 <F1>
<PP&E>                                                        0
<DEPRECIATION>                                                0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                            2,204
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                         0 <F1>
<BONDS>                                                   1,160
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                         0
<PREFERRED>                                                   0
<COMMON>                                                      0
<OTHER-SE>                                               (2,049)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                              2,204
<SALES>                                                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                             89
<CGS>                                                         0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                 0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                            281
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                          157
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                               0
<INCOME-TAX>                                                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                           0
<DISCONTINUED>                                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                             813
<CHANGES>                                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                                                621
<EPS-BASIC>                                               33.36 <F2>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                 0
<FN>
<F1> Registrant has an unclassified balance sheet. <F2> Multiplier is 1.
</FN>


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5 

         
<S>                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                      JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                        MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                1,880,693
<SECURITIES>                                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                         6,649,620
<ALLOWANCES>                                  0
<INVENTORY>                           7,821,678
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                     17,887,272
<PP&E>                                8,345,828
<DEPRECIATION>                        3,235,954
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                       25,437,982
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                 7,829,505
<BONDS>                               4,408,895
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                         0
<PREFERRED>                                   0
<COMMON>                                 51,351
<OTHER-SE>                           10,001,263
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>         25,437,982
<SALES>                              11,872,021
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                     11,902,738
<CGS>                                10,161,399
<TOTAL-COSTS>                        10,161,399
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                      1,026,269
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      165,511
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         549,559
<INCOME-TAX>                             39,592
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     509,967
<DISCONTINUED>                                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               0
<CHANGES>                                     0
<NET-INCOME>                            509,967
<EPS-PRIMARY>                               .10
<EPS-DILUTED>                               .08
<FN>
<F1>Accounts receivable are net of allowance of $53,000 at March 
31, 1998.
<F2>Inventories are net of reserve of $272,000 at March 31, 1998.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
2816.602 Labor-hour contracts.

The limitations set forth in 2816.601 for time-and-materials contracts also applies to labor hour

contracts.

Parent topic: Subpart 2816.6 - Time-and-Materials, Labor-Hour, and Letter Contracts
§ 1040.89-13 Exhaustion of administrative remedies. ( a ) A complainant may file a civil action following the exhaustion of administrative remedies under the Act. Administrative remedies are exhausted if: ( 1 ) One hundred eighty (180) days have elapsed since the complainant filed the complaint and DOE has made no findings with regard to the complainant; or
( 2 ) DOE issues any findings in favor of the recipient.
( b ) If DOE fails to make a finding within 180 days or issues a finding in favor of the recipient, the Director, Office of Civil Rights and Diversity, will: ( 1 ) Promptly advise the complainant of this fact; and
( 2 ) Advise the complainant of his or her right to bring a civil action for injunctive relief; and
( 3 ) Inform the complainant: ( i ) That the complainant may bring a civil action only in a United States District Court for the district in which the recipient is located or transacts business;
( ii ) That a complainant prevailing in a civil action has the right to be awarded the costs of the action, including reasonable attorney fees, but that the complainant must demand these costs in the complaint;
( iii ) That, before commencing the action, the complainant shall give 30 days notice, by registered mail, to the Secretary of DOE, the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services, the Attorney General of the United States, and the recipient;
( iv ) That the notice must state: the alleged violation of the Act and these regulations; the relief requested; the court in which the complainant is bringing the action; and whether or not attorney fees are demanded in the event the complainant prevails; and
( v ) That the complainant may not bring an action if the same alleged violation of the Act by the same recipient is the subject of a pending action in any court of the United States.
[50 FR 8089, Feb. 27, 1985, as amended at 68 FR 51348, Aug. 26, 2003]
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

vs. ) CR. NO. 1:06cr205-WHA 

)

SEBASTIAN K. SMITH, JR. )

ORDER

Pursuant to the defendant’s Notice of Intent to Change Plea (Doc. # 28) filed on

September 29, 2006, it is hereby

ORDERED that the defendant’s change of plea hearing be and is hereby set for

October 10, 2006, at 9:00 a.m., in courtroom 4B, United States Courthouse Complex, One

Church Street, Montgomery, Alabama. 

If the defendant is in custody, the United States Marshal or the person having custody

of the defendant shall produce the defendant for the proceeding.

Done this 2 day of October, 2006. nd

 /s/Charles S. Coody 

CHARLES S. COODY

CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:06-cr-00205-WHA-CSC Document 29 Filed 10/02/2006 Page 1 of 1
Case 3:06-cv-00733-MHT-TFM Document 32 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 1 of 3
Case 3:06-cv-00733-MHT-TFM Document 32 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 2 of 3
Case 3:06-cv-00733-MHT-TFM Document 32 Filed 10/15/2007 Page 3 of 3
[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 33 (Friday, February 19, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 7539]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-3172]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Small Business/Self 
Employed Project Committee

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Small Business/
Self Employed Project Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer 
Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on 
improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service.

DATES: The meeting will be held Thursday, March 25, 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Janice Spinks at 1-888-912-1227 or 
206-220-6098.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Small Business/Self 
Employed Project Committee will be held Thursday, March 25, 2010, at 
9:00 a.m. Pacific Time via telephone conference. The public is invited 
to make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. 
Due to limited conference lines, notification of intent to participate 
must be made with Janice Spinks. For more information please contact 
Ms. Spinks at 1-888-912-1227 or 206-220-6098, or write TAP Office, 915 
2nd Avenue, MS W-406, Seattle, WA 98174 or post comments to the Web 
site: http://www.improveirs.org.
    The agenda will include various IRS issues.

    Dated: February 4, 2010.
Shawn F. Collins,
Acting Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. 2010-3172 Filed 2-18-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
SUBCHAPTER F - SPECIAL CATEGORIES OF

CONTRACTING

PART 2137 - SERVICE CONTRACTING

PART 2137 - SERVICE CONTRACTING

Subpart 2137.1 - Service Contracts - General

2137.102 Policy.

2137.110 Contract clause.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

OFFICE OF THE CLERK

POST OFFICE BOX 711

MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA 36101-0711

DEBRA P. HACKETT, CLERK

TELEPHONE (334) 954-3600

March 9, 2007

 

NOTICE OF NON-COMPLIANCE

To: ALL COUNSEL OF RECORD

From: CLERK’S OFFICE

Case Style: Donna Davis vs. Richard M. Dorsey, et al

Case Number: 2:06cv766-MHT

Referenced Pleading: Document #19 Notice to Take Deposition

 Document #20 Notice of Taking Deposition

The referenced pleading was electronically filed on ***March 8, 2007*** in this case and is

not in compliance with the local rules and/or administrative procedures of this court.

*****This pleading is discovery and is not allowed pursuant to Local Rule 5.1 Non-Filing of

Civil Discovery.

The pleading is hereby STRICKEN from the record and the parties are instructed to

disregard the entry of this pleading on the court’s docket. Parties should be aware that the

striking of this entry does not affect their responsibilities as to the discovery process.

Case 2:06-cv-00766-MHT-TFM Document 21 Filed 03/09/2007 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

 FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

vs. ) CASE NUMBER: 2:06-CR-00202-WKW

)

EUGENE L. CLECKLER )

EUGENE CLECKLER’S REQUESTED JURY INSTRUCTION

COMES NOW Eugene L. Cleckler, and hereby requests the the Court to

provide the following suggested charges to the jury in this matter:

1. Multiple Conspiracies.

(For Use with General Conspiracy Charge)

18 USC § 371

You are further instructed, with regard to the alleged conspiracy offense, that

proof of several separate conspiracies is not proof of the single, overall conspiracy

charged in the indictment unless one of the several conspiracies which is proved is

the single conspiracy which the indictment charges.

What you must do is determine whether the single conspiracy charged in the

indictment existed between two or more conspirators. If you find that no such

conspiracy existed, then you must acquit the Defendants of that charge. However, if

you decide that such a conspiracy did exist, you must then determine who the members

were; and, if you should find that a particular Defendant was a member of some other

conspiracy, not the one charged in the indictment, then you must acquit that Defendant.

In other words, to find a Defendant guilty you must unanimously find that

such Defendant was a member of the conspiracy charged in the indictment and not a

member of some other separate conspiracy.

Case 2:06-cr-00202-WKW-CSC Document 60 Filed 12/28/2006 Page 1 of 3
2. Proof of an Overt Act within the Statute of Limitations

(For Use with General Conspiracy Charge)

18 USC § 371

You are further instructed, with regard to the alleged conspiracy offense, that

the government must prove at least one overt act was committed by one of the coconspirators on or after August 15, 2000. If you find that no such overt act was

committed, then you must acquit the Defendants of that charge.

Respectfully submitted, this the 28 day of December, 2006. th

s/ Ronald R. Brunson 

RONALD R. BRUNSON 1696

2126 Morris Avenue

Birmingham, Alabama 35203

(205) 252-2100

Case 2:06-cr-00202-WKW-CSC Document 60 Filed 12/28/2006 Page 2 of 3
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on December 28th, 2006, I electronically filed the

foregoing with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system, which will send

notification of such filing to the following:

Andrew O. Schiff, Esq., Assistant U.S. Attorney

201 One Court Square

Post Office Box 197

Montgomery, AL 36101-0197

Andrew.schiff@usdoj.gov, Debbie.shaw@usdoj.gov

George L. Beck, Jr., Esq.

Terrie S. Biggs, Esq.

CAPELL & HOWARD, P.C.

150 South Perry Street

Post Office Box 2069

Montgomery, Alabama 36102-2069

glb@chlaw.com tsb@chlaw.com 

s/ Ronald R. Brunson 

 RONALD R. BRUNSON

Case 2:06-cr-00202-WKW-CSC Document 60 Filed 12/28/2006 Page 3 of 3