alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 23.1





Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





The Board of Directors


CST Brands, Inc.:





We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No. 333-188392) on Form S-8 of CST Brands, Inc. (the Company), of our report dated February 27, 2015, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of CST Brands, Inc. as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, and the related consolidated and combined statements of income, comprehensive income, cash flows and changes in stockholders’ equity / net investment for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2014, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014, which reports appear in the December 31, 2014 annual report on Form 10-K of the Company.


Our report dated February 27, 2015, on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014, contains an explanatory paragraph that states the Company acquired the General Partner (CrossAmerica GP) of CrossAmerica Partners LP (CrossAmerica) and Nice N Easy Grocery Shoppes (NNE) during 2014. CrossAmerica is a consolidated variable interest entity of CST Brands, Inc. Management excluded from its assessment of the effectiveness of CST Brands, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014, CrossAmerica GP’s, CrossAmerica’s and NNE’s internal control over financial reporting. The CrossAmerica GP, CrossAmerica, and NNE acquisitions contributed approximately 5 percent of total operating revenues for the year ended December 31, 2014 and accounted for approximately 33 percent of total assets as of December 31, 2014, included in the consolidated financial statements of CST Brands, Inc. and subsidiaries as of and for the year ended December 31, 2014. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting of CST Brands, Inc. also excluded an evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting of CrossAmerica GP, CrossAmerica, and NNE.


Our report on the consolidated and combined financial statements refers to a change in the method of accounting for discontinued operations.





/s/ KPMG LLP





San Antonio, Texas


June 8, 2015
<page>

EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Universal Detection Technology (the
"Registrant") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2008, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Jacques Tizabi, Principal Executive Officer and Acting Principal Financial
Officer of the Registrant, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1)       The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Registrant.



                                            /s/ Jacques Tizabi
                                            ------------------------
Dated:  May 19, 2008                        Jacques Tizabi
                                            Principal Executive Officer and
                                            Acting Principal Financial Officer
                                            and Principal Accounting Officer
Case 2:06-cr-00202-WKW-CSC Document 1 Filed 08/01/2006 Page 1 of 7
Case 2:06-cr-00202-WKW-CSC Document 1 Filed 08/01/2006 Page 2 of 7
Case 2:06-cr-00202-WKW-CSC Document 1 Filed 08/01/2006 Page 3 of 7
Case 2:06-cr-00202-WKW-CSC Document 1 Filed 08/01/2006 Page 4 of 7
Case 2:06-cr-00202-WKW-CSC Document 1 Filed 08/01/2006 Page 5 of 7
Case 2:06-cr-00202-WKW-CSC Document 1 Filed 08/01/2006 Page 6 of 7
Case 2:06-cr-00202-WKW-CSC Document 1 Filed 08/01/2006 Page 7 of 7
Editorial Note on Part 2
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

§ 2.702 Subpoenas. ( a ) On application by any party, the designated presiding officer or, if they are not available, the Chief Administrative Judge, or other designated officer will issue subpoenas requiring the attendance and testimony of witnesses or the production of evidence. The officer to whom application is made may require a showing of general relevance of the testimony or evidence sought, and may withhold the subpoena if such a showing is not made. However, the officer may not determine the admissibility of evidence.
( b ) Every subpoena will bear the name of the Commission, the name and office of the issuing officer and the title of the hearing, and will command the person to whom it is directed to attend and give testimony or produce specified documents or other things at a designated time and place. The subpoena will also advise of the quashing procedure provided in paragraph (f) of this section.
( c ) Unless the service of a subpoena is acknowledged on its face by the witness or is served by an officer or employee of the Commission, it must be served by a person who is not a party to the hearing and is not less than eighteen (18) years of age. Service of a subpoena must be made by delivery of a copy of the subpoena to the person named in it and tendering that person the fees for one day's attendance and the mileage allowed by law. When the subpoena is issued on behalf of the Commission, fees and mileage need not be tendered and the subpoena may be served by registered mail.
( d ) Witnesses summoned by subpoena must be paid the fees and mileage paid to witnesses in the district courts of the United States by the party at whose instance they appear.
( e ) The person serving the subpoena shall make proof of service by filing the subpoena and affidavit or acknowledgment of service with the officer before whom the witness is required to testify or produce evidence or with the Secretary. Failure to make proof of service does not affect the validity of the service.
( f ) On motion made promptly, and in any event at or before the time specified in the subpoena for compliance by the person to whom the subpoena is directed, and on notice to the party at whose instance the subpoena was issued, the presiding officer or, if they are unavailable, the Commission may: ( 1 ) Quash or modify the subpoena if it is unreasonable or requires evidence not relevant to any matter in issue, or
( 2 ) Condition denial of the motion on just and reasonable terms.
( g ) On application and for good cause shown, the Commission will seek judicial enforcement of a subpoena issued to a party and which has not been quashed.
( h ) The provisions of paragraphs (a) through (g) of this section are not applicable to the attendance and testimony of the Commissioners or NRC personnel, or to the production of records or documents in their custody.
[69 FR 2256, Jan. 14, 2004, as amended at 88 FR 57877, Aug. 24, 2023]
Case 2:06-cr-00200-WHA-CSC Document 85 Filed 12/01/2006 Page 1 of 1
§ 15.20 Aggressive agency collection activity. ( a ) The NRC shall take aggressive action to collect all debts. These collection activities will be undertaken promptly and follow-up action will be taken as appropriate. These regulations do not require the Department of Justice, Department of the Treasury (Treasury), or any other Treasury-designated collection center to duplicate collection activities previously undertaken by NRC.
( b ) Debt referred or transferred to Treasury or to a Treasury-designated debt collection center under the authority of 31 U.S.C. 3711(g) must be serviced, collected, or compromised, or the collection action will be suspended or terminated, in accordance with the statutory requirements and authorities applicable to the collection of the debts.
( c ) The NRC shall cooperate with other agencies in their debt collection activities.
( d ) The NRC will consider referring debts that are less than 120 days delinquent to Treasury or to a Treasury-designated debt collection center to accomplish efficient, cost-effective debt collection. Referrals to debt collection centers are at the discretion of, and for a time period acceptable to, Treasury.
( e ) The NRC shall transfer any debt that has been delinquent for 120 days or more to Treasury so that it may take appropriate action to collect the debt or terminate collection actions. This requirement does not apply to any debt that— ( 1 ) Is in litigation or foreclosure;
( 2 ) Will be disposed of under an approved asset sale program;
( 3 ) Has been referred to a private collection contractor for a period of time acceptable to Treasury;
( 4 ) Is at a debt collection center for a period of time acceptable to Treasury;
( 5 ) Will be collected under internal offset procedures within 3 years after the date the debt first became delinquent; or
( 6 ) Is exempt from this requirement based on a determination by Treasury that exemption for a certain class of debt is in the best interest of the United States.
( f ) Agencies operating Treasury-designated debt collection centers are authorized to charge a fee for services rendered regarding referred or transferred debts. The fee may be paid out of amounts collected and may be added to the debt as an administrative cost.
[67 FR 30319, May 6, 2002, as amended at 79 FR 66602, Nov. 10, 2014]
§ 205.283 Applications for refund. ( a ) Any person entitled to a refund pursuant to a final Decision and Order issued pursuant to § 205.282 may file an Application for Refund. All Applications must be signed by the applicant and specify the DOE order to which they pertain. Any Application for a refund in excess of $100 must be file in duplicate, and a copy of that Application will be available for public inspection in the DOE Public Docket Room at 2000 M Street, NW., Washington, DC. Any applicant who believes that his Application contains confidential information must so indicate on the first page of his Application and submit two additional copies of his Application from which the information that the applicant claims is confidential has been deleted, together with a statement specifying why any such information is privileged or confidential.
( b ) The contents of an Application for Refund shall be specified in the final Decision and Order referred to in § 205.282(c). A filing deadline for Applications shall also be specified in the final Decision and Order, and shall be no less than 90 days after the publication of the Order in the Federal Register.
( c ) Each Application shall be in writing and signed by the applicant, and shall indicate whether the applicant or any person acting on his instructions has filed or intends to file any other Application or claim of whatever nature regarding the matters at issue in the underlying enforcement proceeding. Each Application shall also include a sworn statement by the applicant that all information in his Application is true and correct to the best of his knowledge and belief.
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls
o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 8 A0 87 9 . TONY J ACOBS v . THE STATE.

In 2 01 6 , To n y Jaco b s p led g u il t y t o ag grav at ed as s au l t an d a n u m b er o f o t h er

o ffen s es

. He s u b seq uen t l y req u es t ed an o u t

- o f-t i m e ap p eal , wh i ch t h e t ri al co u rt d en ied on Sep t em

b er 2 8 , 2 0 1 7

. J aco b s fi led a p ro s e n o t i ce o f ap p eal fro m th i s o rd er

o n No v em

ber 2 0 , 2 0 1 7 . W e l ack ju ri s d i ct i o n

. T o b e t i m el y , a n ot i ce o f ap p eal m u s t b e fi l ed wi t h i n 3 0 d ay s o f en t r y o f t h e

o rd er o n ap p eal

. See OCGA § 5 -6 -3 8 (a). Th e p ro p er an d ti m el y fi l i n g o f a n o t i ce o f
ap p eal i s an ab s ol u t e req u i rem en t t o co n fer ju ri s d ict i o n o n t hi s Co u rt . See Ro wl a n d v. S t a t e , 2 6 4 Ga. 8 7 2 , 8 7 2 (1 ) (4 5 2 SE2 d 7 5 6 ) (1 9 9 5 ). Here, J aco b s fi l ed h i s n o t i ce

o f ap p eal 5 3 d ay s aft er en t ry o f t h e o rd er h e s eek s t o ap p eal

. Acco rd i n gl y , h is ap p eal i s u n t i m el y

an d i s h ereb y DISM ISSED fo r l ack o f ju ri s d i ct i o n

.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia C le r k ’ s O f f i c e , A t la n t a ,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti fy t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m
t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d th e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. January 23, 2018

01/23/2018
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       1,582,769
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,693,860
<ALLOWANCES>                                   819,249
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             3,185,339
<PP&E>                                         918,915
<DEPRECIATION>                                 512,558
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,844,806
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,692,989
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           11,050
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        35,682
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,059,404
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,844,806
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,729,677
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  746,307
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               559,991
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              (16,898)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,927
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                475,982
<INCOME-TAX>                                   183,250
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            292,732
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   292,732
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.05


</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 32.1CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

       In connection with the quarterlyreport of CNB Corporation on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2010as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, W.Jennings Duncan, President and Chief Executive Officer of CNB Corporation,certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:
| 1. | The  above-listed Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)  or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                 |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|    |                                                                                                                                                                    |
| 2. | The  information contained in the above-listed Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all  material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the  Company. |
| Date:   November 9, 2010 | /s/W. Jennings Duncan                     W. Jennings  Duncan  President and Chief Executive Officer |
|-------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                               |                                                                                                                                                                                                               |
Subpart 906.1 - Full and Open Competition

Parent topic: PART 906 - COMPETITION REQUIREMENTS

906.102 Use of competitive procedures.

(d) Other competitive procedures.

(1) Professional architect-engineer services shall be negotiated in accordance with subpart 936.6

and 48 CFR subpart 36.6.

(4) Program research and development announcements shall follow the competitive selection

procedures for the award of research proposals in accordance with subpart 917.73 and 48 CFR part

35.

(5) Program opportunity notices for commercial demonstrations shall follow the competitive

selection procedures for award of these proposals in accordance with subpart 917.72.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

May 30, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

130437 Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. VISION INFORMATION SERVICES, Stephen J. Markman, LLC, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 130437 COA: 258422 Genesee CC: 03-077252-CK PHILLIP TOCCO, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal th e December 20, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is cons idered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

l0522 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

May 30, 2006

Clerk
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, NORTHERN DIVISION

DERON L. BARNETT, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

v. ) 2:06cv725-MHT

) 

REGIONS BANK, )

)

Defendant. )

ORDER

For good cause shown, it is ORDERED that, pursuant to

28 U.S.C.A. § 636, this case is referred to the United

States Magistrate Judge assigned to this case for

consideration and disposition or recommendation on all

pretrial matters as may be appropriate.

DONE, this the 16th day of August, 2006.

 /s/ Myron H. Thompson 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00725-MHT-CSC Document 3 Filed 08/16/2006 Page 1 of 1
## R-969

EA~~ORNEYGENERAL OF TB-EXAS

PRICE DANIEL ATTORNEY

GENERAL AUSTIN 11. TExAe

December 30, 1947

Hon. George H. Sheppard Comptroll~W

’of Public Accounts Opinion No. V-467 Austin, Texas **Re:** Theexemption of gas,burned in engines useii for lifting oil from the,tax levied unaer Art. 7047b, V.C.S. Dear Sir:Pour follows :

“The opinion request dated December 1, 1947, is **aa**

question- has arisen i? .this department

_ . _ - as to whether gas burned ln engines usea ror lifting oil is exempt from the tax levies under Article 7047b R.C.S.

“Sub-section (c) of Seatlon 1 (1) of Article 7047b excludes gas used for llftlng oil, iinless sold for such purpose, ln computing the tax tinthe business or occupation of producing gas within this State.

“It is argued that gas used for lease operations might well bewFthin the exclusion provision of gas used for llftlng oil. Apimping engine operating a pumpingjack uses the gas burned to operate the engine for lifting oil. I shall, therefore, thank you to advlse this department whether gas consume&in an engine used for &Lfting oil is taxable under Article 7047b.

“Reference is madeto your Opinion O-4151-A." Thequestion presented is the use of gas as explained in your letter exempt from the occupation tax imposed,byArtLcle 7047b, by virtue of the exclusion contained in Subsection c of Section 1 of said Article. ThFssubsection reeds as follows:

“Gasused for Lifting oil, unless sold for such purpose.” If the use as explained in **your** letter, namely aspfuel for the operation of,a pumpingengine which lifts 011, is auseHon. Geo. H. Sheppard - Page 2 

## (v-467) 'b,;f

comprehended by said Subsection of the statute, then notati is .dueupon the proauction'of said gas. Wedonot, however, accord such meaning to the phrase 'inthe statute "used for lifting oil". This term is meant only to apply to gas Injected Into thb earth for repressurlng or lifting the oil of the ground, andhas no i?eference to It@ use as fuel to generate mechanical power, such as puinplngop8rat'Fon.s for lifting oil. This Is the construction this, Department has heretofore &corded to It. (See OpItilon 0:&151;A, a copy of which you have.) ,Thls;we think, wasthe inanrfbst intention of the Legislature, end you are accordingly SO advised., SUMMARY

..

Exclusion from the gas productFon,tax of gas usea for lifting oil as provided FnSub-section c of Sbction 1 of Art,icle 7047b, has reference only to gas Injected Fntothe ground for the purpose of ijressure in-~lifting the oil, andnot to gas used as fuel In a pumpingengine that lifts 011. Yours very truly~ ATTORNEY

GENERAL

OFTEXAS By s/L. P. Loll&r L. P. Lollar Asslstafit APPROVED s/Fagan Dickson 

### FIRSTASSISTANT ATTOR?IBYGENERAL LPL/lh/wc
#### In the Matter of Michele Gordon et al., Respondents v Board of Education of the Addison Central School District et al., Appellants.

Judgment affirmed, without costs. All concur, Cardamone, J. P., Witmer and Moule, JJ., upon constraint of *Matter of Doyle v Board of Educ.*(77 AD2d 799). (Appeal from judgment of Steuben Supreme Court—art 78.) Present— Cardamone, J. P., Schnepp, Callahan, Witmer and Moule, JJ.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

vs. ) CR. NO. 2:06CR193-MEF

)

JOSHUA WAYNE HESTER )

ORDER

Pursuant to the defendant’s Notice of Intent to Change Plea (Doc. #35) filed on

November 15, 2006, it is hereby

ORDERED that the defendant’s change of plea hearing be and is hereby set for 

November 20, 2006, at 2:00 p.m., in courtroom 4B, United States Courthouse

Complex, One Church Street, Montgomery, Alabama. 

The Clerk is directed to provide a court reporter for this proceeding. If the

defendant is in custody, the United States Marshal or the person having custody of the

defendant shall produce the defendant for the proceeding.

Done this 15th day of November, 2006.

 /s/Charles S. Coody 

CHARLES S. COODY

CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:06-cr-00193-MEF-CSC Document 38 Filed 11/15/2006 Page 1 of 1
###### Editorial Note on Subpart A of Part 989

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 989 appear at 83 FR 53973, Oct. 26, 2018.

#### § 989.21 Crop year.

*Crop year* means the 12-month period beginning with August 1 of any year and ending with July 31 of the following year.

[41 FR 32412, Aug. 3, 1976]