alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Denise Munroe Brightley, Respondent-Appellant, v City of New York, Appellant-Respondent.

[815 NYS2d 731]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Partnow, J.), dated January 28, 2005, as denied that branch of its motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, and the plaintiff cross-appeals from so much of the same order as denied her cross motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed and cross-appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

Neither the defendant nor the plaintiff established entitlement to judgment as a matter of law. Although a defendant has no duty to remove snow during an ongoing storm, a defendant may be held liable where that party’s snow-removal efforts create a hazardous condition or exacerbate a natural hazard created by the storm *(see Grillo v Brooklyn Hosp.,*280 AD2d 452*927[2001]). Under the circumstances, a triable issue of fact exists as to whether the defendant’s snow-removal efforts created the icy condition or exacerbated a natural hazard created by the storm. Prudenti, P.J., Florio, Krausman and Mastro, JJ., concur.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

**COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,**

**Appellant**

**v.**

**JERMAINE J. MORGAN,**

**Appellee :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 23 WAP 2014** 

**Appeal from the Order of the Court of Common Pleas of Blair County entered**  **May 14, 2014 at No.**

**CP-07-CR-0001032-2013.**

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, **this 31 st**  **day of August, 2015, the Order of the Court of Comm on** 

**Pleas is hereby** AFFIRMED **. See Commonwealth v. Hopkins, 117 A.3d 247 (Pa. 20 15).**
2815.606 Agency procedures.

The designated point of contact for each contracting activity shall provide for and coordinate

receipt, review, evaluation, safeguarding, and final disposition of unsolicited proposals in

accordance with FAR subpart 15.6.

Parent topic: Subpart 2815.6 - Unsolicited Proposals
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                             5
<MULTIPLIER>                                      1,000
       
<S>                                                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                     3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                                0
<SECURITIES>                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   342,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                          0
<INVENTORY>                                           0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                346,000
<PP&E>                                        5,373,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                1,558,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                4,161,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                         3,929,000
<BONDS>                                               0
<COMMON>                                        540,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<OTHER-SE>                                  (13,424,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  4,161,000
<SALES>                                               0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                      0
<CGS>                                                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   414,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                414,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              627,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (1,041,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                          0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (1,041,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                       0
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (1,041,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      0.11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      0.11
        






</TABLE>
Page 1 of 3

Disposition Comments

Docket No: FAA-2013-0399 These comments are in

Directorate ID: 2011-SW-064-AD response to an SNPRM

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

Next Step: FRAN SNPRM

 No Comments/Only Supportive Comments Received – If this box is checked, no signatures are 

required.

No Has the referenced service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? If yes, 

list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously 

published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance.

Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of 

each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues 

from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and 

describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA-IR-M-8040.1C Chapter 9.

ISSUE 1: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD: 

If NO, we don’t agree because 

ISSUE 2: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD:
Page 2 of 3

If NO, we don’t agree because 

For additional issues, double-click here
Page 3 of 3

Signature Section

Signature indicates concurrence with this action.

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

ASE Printed Name: Date

Branch Manager Date
`[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 1053 Reported in House (RH)]







                                                 House Calendar No. 242
109th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 1053

                          [Report No. 109-700]

   Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to 
  consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on 
                                 Rules.


_______________________________________________________________________


                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 28, 2006

    Mr. Cole of Oklahoma, from the Committee on Rules, reported the 
  following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and 
                         ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION


 
   Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to 
  consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on 
                                 Rules.

    Resolved, That the requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII for a 
two-thirds vote to consider a report from the Committee on Rules on the 
same day it is presented to the House is waived with respect to any 
resolution reported on the legislative day of September 29, 2006.
                                                 House Calendar No. 242

109th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                              H. RES. 1053

                          [Report No. 109-700]

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

   Waiving a requirement of clause 6(a) of rule XIII with respect to 
  consideration of certain resolutions reported from the Committee on 
                                 Rules.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           September 28, 2006

        Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed`
648.201 Clauses for supply or service contracts.       The authority to determine exemptions prescribed in FAR 48.201(a)(6) is delegated, without power of redelegation, to the head of the contracting activity.    **Parent topic:** Subpart 648.2—Contract Clauses
Editorial Note on Part 4
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 4 appear at 77 FR 39904, July 6, 2012.

§ 4.341 Reports. The NRC shall submit to the Secretary of Health and Human Services, not later than December 31 of each year, a report which— ( a ) Describes in detail the steps taken during the preceding fiscal year to carry out the Act; and
( b ) Contains data on the frequency, type, and resolution of complaints and on any compliance reviews, sufficient to permit analysis of the agency's progress in reducing age discrimination in programs or activities receiving Federal financial assistance from NRC; and
( c ) Contains data directly relevant to the extent of any pattern or practice of age discrimination which NRC has identified in any programs or activities receiving Federal financial assistance from NRC and to progress toward eliminating it; and
( d ) Contains evaluative or interpretative information which NRC determines is useful in analyzing agency progress in reducing age discrimination in programs or activities receiving Federal financial assistance from NRC; and
( e ) Contains whatever other data the Secretary of HHS may require.
[52 FR 25358, July 7, 1987, as amended at 68 FR 51345, Aug. 26, 2003]
ACTIVE 213861350v.1

CERTIFICATION

Re:
Morgan Stanley Bank of America Merrill Lynch Trust 2013-C7, Commercial
Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2013-C7(the "Transaction"), issued pursuant to
the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of  January 1, 2013 (the "Pooling and Servicing
Agreement"),  executed  in  connection  with  the  Transaction  (capitalized  terms  used  but  not
defined herein have the meanings set forth in the Pooling and Servicing Agreement).



__________________________________________


I, George Kok, certify that:


1.
I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required
to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Morgan Stanley Bank
of America Merrill Lynch Trust 2013-C7 (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");


2.
Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do
not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,
not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;


3.
Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information
required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the
Exchange Act periodic reports;


4.
Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement(s) required in this
report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic
reports,  the  servicer(s)  have  fulfilled  their  obligations  under  the  servicing  agreement(s)  in  all
material respects; and


5.
All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-
backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing
criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item
1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an
exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of
noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.


In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me
by the following unaffiliated parties:



U.S. Bank National Association, as Certificate Administrator


Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Custodian


Midland  Loan  Services,  a  Division  of  PNC  Bank,  National  Association,  as
Master Servicer


Midland  Loan  Services,  a  Division  of  PNC  Bank,  National  Association,  as
Special Servicer


Situs Holdings, LLC, as Trust Advisor

2
ACTIVE 213861350v.1

SOX Certification - MSBAM 2013-C7
ACTIVE 213861350v.1

Date:  March 30, 2016


By /s/ George Kok
Name: George Kok
Title: President
# dep
west virginia department of environmental protection Executive Office 60I 571h Street SE Charleston, WV .25304

Mr. Shawn M. Garvin Regional Administrator U.S. EPA, Region III (3RAOO) 1650 Arch Street Philadelphia, PA 19103-2029 June 17, 2015 Earl Ray Tomblin, Governor Randy C. Huffman, Cabinet Secretary dep.wv.gov



### Re: Revision to the West Virginia State Operating Permits Program Under Title Vof the CleanAir Act Dear Administrator Garvin: On behalfofthe State ofWest Virginia, I am herein submitting the final 2015 Legislative Rule 45CSR30- Requirements for Operating Permits, effective May 1, 2015, as a revision to the State Operating Permits Program under Title V ofthe Clean Air Act. Revisions to the rule implementthe provisions ofEPA's final rule, Deferral for C02 Emissions From Bioenergy and OtherBiogenic Sources Under the Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) and Title VPrograms. Another revision implements an increase in Title V operating fees from $18/tonto $28/ton to keep theTitle V Operating Permit Program solvent in accordance with the Clean AirAct. Included in this submittal is appropriate documentation which validates thatproper state and federal administrative procedural rulemaking requirements have been fulfilled. Also included with this submittal is an electronic copy on compact disk in searchable PDF format. We certify that the enclosed electronic copy contains an exact duplicate ofinformation contained inthe hardcopy submission. West Virginiarequests thatyou incorporate this most recent version of45CSR30 as a revision to West Virginia's Operating Permits Program under Title V ofthe Clean Air Act (approved via direct final rule published on October 3, 2001 at 66 FR 50325). Promoting a healthy environment.Letterto Mr. Shawn M. Garvin Page2 Ifyou have any questions regarding West Virginia's efforts to keep the Title V Operating Permit Program solvent, please feel free to contact Ms. Laura Crowder at (304) 926-0499 extension 1247, or Mr. Fred Durham at (304) 926-0499 extension 1966.

RCH/lmj Enclosure cc: Diana Esher (3APOO) Sincerely, 

# \::)



# _ _**~~** ,

## ~~~-HUffman

Cabinet Secretary

William F. Durham, Director, WVDEP
file:///J|/INITENG/P12%20cases/p120432.eng.txt[7/30/2012 10:29:30 AM]

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 12-0432

Focus Ready Draft 7/23/2012

ENGINEER: Jon \ DDH

PV (kg/yr): 

SUBMITTER: 

USE:

OTHER USES:

 

SAT (concerns) (07/06/2012):

Related Cases and Related Cases and Misc SAT Info:
file:///J|/INITENG/P12%20cases/p120432.eng.txt[7/30/2012 10:29:30 AM]

Migration to groundwater: negl-slow

PBT rating: P2B2T1 .

Health: 2 Inhalation

Eco: 1 No releases to Water

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 2-3A

NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS:

Generated by the 06/07/2005 version of ChemSTEER. 

 
file:///J|/INITENG/P12%20cases/p120432.eng.txt[7/30/2012 10:29:30 AM]

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 12-0432
file:///J|/INITENG/P12%20cases/p120432.eng.txt[7/30/2012 10:29:30 AM]

 
file:///J|/INITENG/P12%20cases/p120432.eng.txt[7/30/2012 10:29:30 AM]

 

 

 

 

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 12-0432
file:///J|/INITENG/P12%20cases/p120432.eng.txt[7/30/2012 10:29:30 AM]
Exhibit 99.1



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                                   AS ADDED BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Annual Report of Grange National Bank Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Thomas
A. McCullough, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss. 1350, as added by ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         A.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         B.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.



                                    /s/ Thomas A. McCullough
                                    -----------------------------------
                                    Thomas A. McCullough
                                    President and Chief Executive Officer


Date:  May 14, 2003
162 So.2d 575

#### Mrs. Talita B. COX v. W. R. ALDRICH AND COMPANY, Inc.

No. 47183.

April 17, 1964.

Court of Appeal, First Circuit.

162 So.2d 18.

It is. ordered that the writ of review issue; that the Court of Appeal send up the record in duplicate of the case; and that counsel for plaintiff and defendant be notified.
##### 



Exhibit 31.2
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) UNDER THE EXCHANGE ACT
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of B.H.I.T. Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant is made known to us by others, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Date: May 12, 2006
    By:
    /s/ John V. CurciJohn V. CurciVice-President, Treasurer & Chief Financial Officer
Principal Accounting Officer
###### Editorial Note on Part 34

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 34 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

#### § 34.87 Form of records.

Each record required by this part must be legible throughout the specified retention period. The record may be the original or a reproduced copy or a microform provided that the copy or microform is authenticated by authorized personnel and that the microform is capable of reproducing a clear copy throughout the required retention period. The record may also be stored in electronic media with the capability for producing legible, accurate, and complete records during the required retention period. Records, such as letters, drawings, and specifications, must include all pertinent information, such as stamps, initials, and signatures. The licensee shall maintain adequate safeguards against tampering with and loss of records.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

M IDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABA M A

OFFICE OF THE CLERK

POST OFFICE BOX 711

MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA 36101-0711

DEBRA P. HACKETT, CLERK

TELEPHONE (334) 954-3600

October 26, 2006

NOTICE OF CORRECTION

From: Clerk’s Office

Case Style: Garner v. Progressive Direct Insurance Company

Case Number: 1:06cv00781-MHT

This Notice of Correction was filed in the referenced case this date to correct the main PDF

document previously attached to include the signature date. 

The correct main PDF document is attached to this notice for your review. Reference is made

to document # 8 filed on October 25, 2006.

Case 1:06-cv-00781-MHT-TFM Document 9 Filed 10/26/2006 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

Russell E. Garner *

*

Plaintiff, *

*

vs. * Civil Case No. 01:06cv781-MHT

*

Progressive Direct Insurance Company, *

*

Defendant. *

DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR ENTRY OF HIPAA ORDER

COMES NOW the Defendant, by and through counsel, and respectfully requests this

Honorable Court to sign and enter the attached HIPAA Order in this case. Said Order is

necessary so that the Defendant may obtain mental health records which are relevant and

material to the claims asserted against the Defendant by the Plaintiff in this case. 

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, the Defendant respectfully requests this

Honorable Court to sign and enter the attached HIPAA Order so that the Defendant may

utilize said order to begin discovery of relevant and material medical information with

respect to the Plaintiff. 

Respectfully submitted this the 25 day of October, 2006. th

_/s/ Jason D. Darneille________________

Alex L. Holtsford, Jr. (HOL048)

Jason D. Darneille (DAR011)

Attorneys for Defendant

Case 1:06-cv-00781-MHT-TFM Document 9-2 Filed 10/26/2006 Page 1 of 2
OF COUNSEL:

NIX HOLTSFORD GILLILAND HIGGINS & HITSON, P.C.

P. O. Box 4128

Montgomery, Alabama 36103

Tel: 334-215-8585

Fax: 334-215-7101

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing has been served upon:

David W. Rousseau

Attorney For Plaintiff

211 W. Adams Street

Dothan, Alabama 36303

by placing same in the United States Mail, postage prepaid, on this the _25th_ day of

October, 2006.

_/s/ Jason D. Darneille________________

OF COUNSEL 

Case 1:06-cv-00781-MHT-TFM Document 9-2 Filed 10/26/2006 Page 2 of 2
Case 1:06-cr-00201-WHA-CSC Document 23 Filed 09/19/2006 Page 1 of 2
Case 1:06-cr-00201-WHA-CSC Document 23 Filed 09/19/2006 Page 2 of 2