alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 

/( '· )[_;(i~.~-J..~_:,_:_·_ •. :~t_·=: .. :f·;., - J" ' --• • .//-;; / 

! /_' ' -·' 

THE STATE OF TEXA~('h o ,~!'1 10 47 MANDATE ,-~\:~~s,-~-' ... , 

******************************************* ** Ots iR!{: ,:' ,:·-··:."~'-._. --(Eifff 

TO THE 420TH DISTRICT COURT OF NACOGDOCHES COUNTY, GREETING: 

Before our Court of Appeals for the 12th Court of Appeals District of Texas, on the 25th 

day of March, 2015, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between 

TOCARRA LOCKETT A/K/ A TOCARRA MCKIND, Appellant 

NO. 12-13-00357-CR; Trial Court No. F1320229 

Opinion by Greg Neeley, Justice. 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee 

was determined; and therein our said Court made its order in these words: 

"THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record and the briefs tiled herein, and 

the same being considered, because it is the opinion of this court that there was error in the 

judgment of the court below, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by this court that 

the judgment of the trial court be reversed and a judgment of acquittal be, and the same is, 

hereby entered herein in accordance with the opinion of this court; and that this decision be 

certified to the court below for observance." 

WHEREAS, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of Appeals 

for the Twelfth Court of Appeals District of Texas in this behalf, and in all things have it duly 

recognized, obeyed, and executed. 

WITNESS, THE HONORABLE .JAMES T. WORTHEN, Chief Justice of our Court 

of Appeals for the Twelfth Court of Appeals District, with the Seal thereof affixed, at the City of 

Tyler, this the 191h day of May, 2015. 

CATHY S. LUSK, CLERK 

 FILED IN 12th COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 5/27/2015 3:33:10 PM CATHY S. LUSK Clerk
CHJiif jUSTICE 

jAM~S T. WORTIIEN 

TwELFTH COURT OF APPEALS 

[USTJUiS 

BRIAN HOYI.Ii 

GRF.r. NliELEY 

May 19,2015 

Ms. Loretta Cammack 

District Clerk 

101 West Main Street 

Room 120 

Nacogdoches, TX 75961 

*DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL* 

RE: Case Number: 

Trial Court Case Number: 

12-13-00357-CR 

F1320229 

Style: Tocarra Lockett a/k/a Tocarra McKind 

v. 

The State ofTexas 

FILE: COPY 

Pursuant to Rule 18.1 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, enclosed herewith is the 

Mandate issued in the above cause. When the District or County Clerk has executed the 

Mandate in accordance with the opinion of this Court, the Clerk is requested to fill in the 

infonnation below and to return the attached copy to this office. 

Very truly yours, 

CATHY S. LUSK, CLERK 

C Ms. Cristin Lane (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL) 

C Mr. Seth T. Johnson (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL) 

Mandate executed on .:2 -z-#1 day of ~ , 2015. 

Brief explanation ~faction taken: -fJ!/tA'JCIUILL t )z(jL) < )Jtt.dJ ,At1fu.4,c:L-

~,U.Ut 'ij!J,u_j~ ~ District/Gon~ Clerk 

1517WBSTFRONTSTRBBT • SIJJTI!354 • 'l'YLBR, TX75702 • TI!L:903·593·8471 • FAX:903·593·2193 

Serving Ander~vn, Angelina, Cherokee, Gregg, Henderson, Houston, Nacogdoches, Rains, Rusk, Sabine, San Augustine, Shelby, Smith, Tri11ity; Upshur, Van 

Za11dt and Wood Counties 

www.12thcoa.co;•rts.state.tx.us
§ 218.40 Investigations. ( a ) The DOE may initiate and conduct investigations relating to the scope, nature and extent of compliance by any person with the rules, regulations or statutes of the DOE or any order promulgated by the DOE under the authority of section 251 of EPCA, or any court decree.
( b ) Any duly designated and authorized representative of DOE has the authority to conduct an investigation and to take such action as he deems necessary and appropriate to the conduct of the investigation including any action pursuant to § 205.8.
( c ) There are no parties, as that term is used in adjudicative proceedings, in an investigation under this subpart, and no person may intervene or participate as a matter of right in any investigation under this subpart.
( d ) Any person may request the DOE to initiate an investigation pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section. A request for an investigation shall set forth the subject matter to be investigated as fully as possible and include supporting documentation and information. No particular forms or procedures are required.
( e ) Any person who is requested to furnish documentary evidence or testimony in an investigation, upon written request, shall be informed of the general purpose of the investigation.
( f ) DOE shall not disclose information or documents that are obtained during any investigation unless ( 1 ) DOE directs or authorizes the public disclosure of the investigation;
( 2 ) the information or documents are a matter of public record; or
( 3 ) disclosure is not precluded by the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. 552 and 10 CFR part 1004.
( g ) During the course of an investigation any person may submit at any time any document, statement of facts or memorandum of law for the purpose of explaining the person's position or furnish evidence which the person considers relevant to a matter under investigation.
( h ) If facts disclosed by an investigation indicate that further action is unnecessary or unwarranted, the investigative file may be closed without prejudice to further investigation by the DOE at any time that circumstances so warrant.
PUBLIC LAW 109–354—OCT. 16, 2006 120 STAT. 2017

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY—H.R. 138:

HOUSE REPORTS: No. 109–618 (Comm. on Resources).

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD, Vol. 152 (2006):

Sept. 12, considered and passed House.

Sept. 29, considered and passed Senate.

Æ

Public Law 109–354

109th Congress

An Act

To revise the boundaries of John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier Resources System

Jekyll Island Unit GA–06P.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPLACEMENT OF CERTAIN JOHN H. CHAFEE COASTAL

BARRIER RESOURCES SYSTEM MAP.

(a) IN GENERAL.—The map subtitled ‘‘GA–06P’’, relating to

the John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier Resources System unit designated as Coastal Barrier Resources System Jekyll Island Unit

GA–06P, that is included in the set of maps entitled ‘‘John H.

Chafee Coastal Barrier Resources System’’ and referred to in section

4(a) of the Coastal Barrier Resources Act (16 U.S.C. 3503(a)), is

hereby replaced by another map relating to the unit entitled ‘‘John

H. Chafee Coastal Barrier Resources System Jekyll Island Unit

GA–06P’’ and dated July 10, 2006.

(b) AVAILABILITY.—The Secretary of the Interior shall keep

the replacement map referred to in subsection (a) on file and available for inspection in accordance with the provisions of section

4(b) of the Coastal Barrier Resources Act (16 U.S.C. 3503(b)).

Approved October 16, 2006.

16 USC 3503

note.

Georgia.

Oct. 16, 2006

[H.R. 138]
###### Editorial Note on Part 982

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 982 appear at 61 FR 17559, Apr. 22, 1996.

#### § 982.69 Verification of reports.

For the purpose of checking and verifying reports submitted by handlers, the Secretary and the Board, through its duly authorized agents, shall have access to each handler's premises at any time during reasonable business hours and shall be permitted to inspect any hazelnuts held by such handler and all records of the handler with respect to hazelnuts held or disposed of by such handler and all records of the handler with respect to promotion and advertising activities conducted pursuant to § 982.58. Each handler shall furnish all labor necessary to facilitate such inspections as the Secretary or the Board may make of such handler's holdings of any hazelnuts. Each handler shall store hazelnuts in such manner as to facilitate inspection, and shall maintain adequate storage records which will permit accurate identification of all such hazelnuts held.

[24 FR 6185, Aug. 1, 1959. Redesignated at 26 FR 12751, Dec. 30, 1961, as amended at 37 FR 589, Jan. 14, 1972; 51 FR 29550, Aug. 19, 1986]
# Subpart 811.0 - Definitions

**Parent topic:**PART 811 - DESCRIBING AGENCY NEEDS
|    |                                                                                            |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 1. | I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Cliffs Natural Resources Inc.; and |

|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |  |  |  |
| Date:  | September 25, 2014 |   | By: |   | /s/ Lourenco Goncalves |
|   |   |   |   |   | Lourenco Goncalves |
|   |   |   |   |   | Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer |
§ 110.89 Filing and service. ( a ) Hearing requests, intervention petitions, answers, replies and accompanying documents must be filed with the Commission by delivery or by mail to the Secretary, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001, Attention: Rulemakings and Adjudications Staff or via the E-Filing system, following the procedure set forth in 10 CFR 2.302. Filing by mail is complete upon deposit in the mail. Filing via the E-Filing system is completed by following the requirements described in 10 CFR 2.302(d).
( b ) All filing and Commission notices and orders must be served upon the applicant; the General Counsel, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555; the Executive Secretary, Department of State, Washington, DC 20520; and participants if any. Hearing requests, intervention petitions, and answers and replies must be served by the person filing those pleadings.
( c ) Service is completed by: ( 1 ) Delivering the paper to the person; or leaving it in his office with someone in charge; or, if there is no one in charge, leaving it in a conspicuous place in the office; or, if he has no office or it is closed, leaving it at his usual place of residence with some occupant of suitable age and discretion;
( 2 ) Following the requirements for E-Filing in 10 CFR 2.305;
( 3 ) Depositing it in the United States mail, express mail, or expedited delivery service, properly stamped and addressed; or
( 4 ) Any other manner authorized by law, when service cannot be made as provided in paragraphs (c)(1) through (3) of this section.
( d ) Proof of service, stating the name and address of the person served and the manner and date of service, shall be shown, and may be made by: ( 1 ) Written acknowledgment of the person served or an authorized representative;
( 2 ) The certificate or affidavit of the person making the service; or
( 3 ) Following the requirements for E-Filing in 10 CFR 2.305.
( e ) The Commission may make special provisions for service when circumstances warrant.
[72 FR 49154, Aug. 28, 2007]
§ 1013.37 Initial decision. ( a ) The ALJ shall issue an initial decision based only on the record, which shall contain findings of fact, conclusions of law, and the amount of any penalties and assessments imposed.
( b ) The findings of fact shall include a finding on each of the following issues: ( 1 ) Whether the claims or statements identified in the complaint, or any portions thereof, violate § 1013.3 of this part;
( 2 ) If the person is liable for penalties or assessments, the appropriate amount of any such penalties or assessments considering any mitigating or aggravating factors that he or she finds in the case, such as those described in § 1013.31 of this part.
( c ) The ALJ shall promptly serve the initial decision on all parties within 90 days after the time for submission of post-hearing briefs and reply briefs (if permitted) has expired. The ALJ shall at the same time serve all parties with a statement describing the right of any defendant determined to be liable for a civil penalty or assessment to file a motion for reconsideration with the ALJ or a notice of appeal with the authority head. If the ALJ fails to meet the deadline contained in this paragraph, he or she shall notify the parties of the reason for the delay and shall set a new deadline.
( d ) Unless the initial decision of the ALJ is timely appealed to the authority head, or a motion for reconsideration of the initial decision is timely filed, the initial decision shall constitute the final decision of the authority head and shall be final and binding on the parties 30 days after it is issued by the ALJ.
Subpart 1231.2—Contracts With Commercial

Organizations

Parent topic: PART 1231—CONTRACT COST PRINCIPLES AND PROCEDURES

1231.205 Selected costs.

1231.205-3270 Precontract costs—incurrence of costs.

(a) The decision to incur precontract costs is the responsibility of the contractor. DOT officials shall

not authorize, demand, or require a contractor to incur precontract costs. The contracting officer

may advise the prospective contractor that any costs incurred before contract award are at the

contractor's sole risk and that if negotiations fail to result in a binding contract, payment of these

costs may not be made by the Government.

(b) When the contracting officer determines that incurring precontract costs was necessary to meet

the proposed contract delivery schedule of a cost-reimbursement contract, the clause at

1252.231–70, Date of Incurrence of Costs, may be inserted in the resultant contract.
IN THE UNITED STATES FEDERAL DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, *

Plaintiff, *

 *

vs. * CR. NO. 1:06CR201-WHA

 *

OSCAR MARTINEZ-RAMIREZ *

Defendant. *

NOTICE OF CHANGE OF PLEA

COMES, James R. Cooper, Jr. who gives notice that Mr. Rameriz desires to change his

plea of NOT GUILTY to GUILTY. 

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,

 

s/James R. Cooper, Jr. (COO021)

COOPER & COOPER

Attorney for Defendant

312 Scott Street

Montgomery, AL 36104

(334) 262-4887

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on this the 19 day of December , 2006, I have served a copy of the th

foregoing Notice of Change of Plea upon Ms. Clark Morris , Asst. U.S. Attorney, P.O. Box 197,

Montgomery, Alabama 36101 and by electronic case filing, by placing a copy of same in the

United States Mail properly addressed and postage prepaid.

_s/James R. Cooper, Jr.

cc:

Oscar Martinez-Ramirez

Montgomery City Jail

P. O. Drawer 159

Montgomery, AL 36104

Case 1:06-cr-00201-WHA-CSC Document 28 Filed 12/19/2006 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                          19,899
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  123,158
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               143,057
<PP&E>                                       5,164,863
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,181,495
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,276,108
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           76,496
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,276,108
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               817,607
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               646,222
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             390,932
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   931,172
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
1032.7003 Contract clause.

Except as provided in 1032.7002(a), use the clause at 1052.232-7003, Electronic Submission of

Payment Requests, in all solicitations and contracts.

Parent topic: Subpart 1032.70 - Electronic Submission and Processing of Payment Requests
§ 927.22 Meetings for election of nominees. ( a ) Nominations for members of the Fresh Pear Committee and their alternates shall be made at meetings of growers and handlers held in each of the districts designated in § 927.11 at such times and places designated by the Fresh Pear Committee.
( b ) Nominations for grower and handler members of the Processed Pear Committee and their alternates shall be made at meetings of growers and handlers held in each of the districts designated in § 927.11 at such times and places designated by the Processed Pear Committee. Nominations for processor members of the Processed Pear Committee and their alternates shall be made at a meeting of processors at such time and place designated by the Processed Pear Committee.
LEGAL02/30054234v1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR

THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

MILDRED W. ANDERSON, et al., )

)

)

Plaintiffs, )

)

)

Civil Action No. 2:06-CV-739-LESCSC

v. )

)

)

)

(Removed from the Circuit Court of 

Covington County, Alabama, formerly 

Civ. Action No. CV-06-155)

PACTIV CORPORATION and 

LOUISIANA-PACIFIC CORPORATION

)

)

)

Defendants. )

CONSENT ORDER ENLARGING TIME

TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

With the express consent and agreement of counsel for Plaintiffs, Defendant 

Pactiv Corporation and Defendant Louisiana-Pacific Corporation; and

It appearing that the period of time within which Defendants may answer, plead, 

move, or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs’ Complaint has not yet expired;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, in accordance with Rule 6(b) of the Federal Rules of 

Civil Procedure, that the time within which Defendants may answer, plead, move, or

otherwise respond to Plaintiffs’ Complaint be enlarged through and including September 

25, 2006. 

This ____ day of _____________, 2006.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case 2:06-cv-00739-LES-CSC Document 6 Filed 08/17/2006 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit
10.4

    ADDENDUM

    


    Made this
14th
day of January, 2010

    


    To
Agreement dated December 15, 2009 between Infrastructure Materials Corp.,
Canadian Infrastructure Corp., and Todd Montgomery (the Agreement).

    


    Whereas the parties
anticipated that all conditions would be met and the closing finalized on or
before January 1, 2010; and

    


    Whereas the parties to the
Agreement agree to extend the date to allow further time.

    


    Now therefore the parties to
the Agreement agree as follows:

    


    The date
of Closing and completion of the escrow conditions, where referred to in the
Agreement, shall be extended to take place on or before February 15, 2010, or
such other date as the parties may agree.

    


    All other
terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain the same and time shall
remain of the essence.

    


    This
Addendum may be executed in multiple counterparts, each of which shall be deemed
an original, and all of which together shall constitute one and the same
instrument.  Execution and delivery of this Addendum by exchange of
facsimile copies bearing facsimile signature of a party shall constitute a valid
and binding execution and delivery of this Agreement by such
party.  Such facsimile copies shall constitute enforceable original
documents.

    


    In
Witness whereas the parties have executed this Addendum as of the first date
written above.

    


    
      
        	
                Infrastructure
      Materials Corp.

              
	 
      
	
                By: 

              	
                /s/ Mason Douglas

              
	 
      	
                  Mason
      Douglas

              
	 
      
	
                Canadian
      Infrastructure Corp.

              
	 
      
	
                By:

              	
                /s/ Todd Montgomery

              
	 
      	
                  Todd
      Montgomery

              
	 
      
	
                /s/ Todd Montgomery

              
	
                  Todd
      Montgomery
Editorial Note on Part 2
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

§ 2.318 Commencement and termination of jurisdiction of presiding officer. ( a ) Unless the Commission orders otherwise, the jurisdiction of the presiding officer designated to conduct a hearing over the proceeding, including motions and procedural matters, commences when the proceeding commences. If a presiding officer has not been designated, the Chief Administrative Judge has jurisdiction or, if he or she is unavailable, another administrative judge or administrative law judge has jurisdiction. A proceeding commences when a notice of hearing or a notice of proposed action under § 2.105 is issued. When a notice of hearing provides that the presiding officer is to be an administrative judge or an administrative law judge, the Chief Administrative Judge will designate by order the administrative judge or administrative law judge, as appropriate, who is to preside. The presiding officer's jurisdiction in each proceeding terminates when the period within which the Commission may direct that the record be certified to it for final decision expires, when the Commission renders a final decision, or when the presiding officer withdraws from the case upon considering himself or herself disqualified, whichever is earliest.
( b ) The Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, or the Director, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards, as appropriate, may issue an order and take any otherwise proper administrative action with respect to a licensee who is a party to a pending proceeding. Any order related to the subject matter of the pending proceeding may be modified by the presiding officer as appropriate for the purpose of the proceeding.
[69 FR 2236, Jan. 14, 2004, as amended at 73 FR 5716, Jan. 31, 2008; 77 FR 46592, Aug. 3, 2012; 84 FR 65643, Nov. 29, 2019]
###### Editorial Note on Part 2

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

#### § 2.100 Scope of subpart.

This subpart prescribes the procedure for issuance of a license; amendment of a license at the request of the licensee; transfer and renewal of a license; and issuance of a standard design approval under subpart E of part 52 of this chapter.

[72 FR 49470, Aug. 28, 2007]