alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
162 So.2d 573

#### STATE of Louisiana v. Sam GREEN et al.

No. 47238.

April 17, 1964.

In re: Sam Green applying for writs of certiorari, mandamus and prohibition.

Writs denied. There are no perfected bills of exception. See La.Code Crim.Proc.Art. 499, LSA-R.S. 15:499; State v. Richardson, 220 La. 338, 56 So.2d 568; State v. McDonald, 218 La. 1918, 48 So.2d 797; State v. Foret, 245 La. 70, 156 So.2d 606; 245 La. 187, 157 So.2d 733. Moreover, there is no error patent on the face of the record.
Case 2:06-cv-00767-MEF-SRW Document 2 Filed 08/25/2006 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:06-cv-00767-MEF-SRW Document 2 Filed 08/25/2006 Page 2 of 2
BARA Infoware, Inc. Western Region | 805 Sun Valley Drive | Woodland Park, CO 80863

The Honorable Ray LaHood March 21, 2012

Secretary of Transportation 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Re: Application of Frontier Airlines for Two Beyond‐Perimeter Slot Exemptions for Washington 

National–Colorado Springs Nonstop Service (Docket DOT‐OST‐2012‐0029) 

Dear Secretary LaHood: 

I am a Colorado Springs-based Program Manager, Regional Operations Director of a Small 

Disadvantaged Business, 8(a), BARA Infoware, Inc. (www.barainfo.com). As our company expands out of 

California and into Colorado and the entire Front Range area, we look to provide the most effective cost, 

most efficient performance and streamlined schedules to our Government customers in order to be the

best stewards of funding that we can possibly be. To that end, travel costs (and increasing fuel costs) 

have become a major focus for us – as it has for the vast number of Defense Contractors in / around the 

Colorado Springs area.

With great interest I have watched the developing research and subsequent news of applications by 

Frontier Airlines for two slot exemptions at the Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport (DCA) 

designed to provide non‐stop service from the Colorado Springs Airport (COS) to DCA. This initiative, 

if approved, will not only allow much more flexibility to Government travelers, but will also allow local 

Defense Contractors options to oversee the aforementioned Cost / Performance / Schedules in more 

mutually beneficial methods in support of our Government. 

Locally, BARA Infoware, Inc. is especially keen to support more direct flights to Washington, DC. Flying 

from COS-to-DCA will not only produce fiduciary savings, but will also increase safety since much less 

time will be spent on highways traveling to-and-from Denver International Airport (DIA) – the only other 

option for Colorado Springs-based personnel.

Finally, and as a Retired Officer who served two tours in the Colorado Springs area, I can attest that the 

support to our Active Duty personnel will be significantly enhanced by approval of Frontier’s additional

DCA slot requests since official travel requirements dictate frequent trips to-and-from Washington, DC.

I respectfully request your support and approval of Docket DOT‐OST‐2012‐0029.

Very Respectfully,

Jeffory A. Perkins, PMP

Program Manager Western Region

Email: jeffory.perkins@barainfo.com

Cell Phone: (719) 650-7168
PGI 207.108 Additional requirements for telecommuting.       Contracting officers should avoid specifying unnecessarily restrictive places of performance, to the maximum extent practicable, in accordance with section 875 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2022.    **Parent topic:** PGI 207.1 -ACQUISITION PLANS
###### Editorial Note on Part 2

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

#### § 2.1400 Purpose and scope of subpart N.

###### Cross Reference

Link to an amendment published at 89 FR 67834, Aug. 22, 2024.

The purpose of this subpart is to provide simplified procedures for the expeditious resolution of disputes among parties in an informal hearing process. The provisions of this subpart, together with subpart C of this part, govern all adjudicatory proceedings conducted under the authority of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, the Energy Reorganization Act of 1974, and 10 CFR part 2 except for proceedings on the licensing of the construction and operation of a uranium enrichment facility, proceedings on an initial application for authorization to construct a high-level radioactive waste repository at a geologic repository operations area noticed under §§ 2.101(f)(8) or 2.105(a)(5), proceedings on an initial application for authorization to receive and possess high-level radioactive waste at a geologic repository operations area, proceedings on an initial application for a license to receive and possess high-level radioactive waste at a geologic repository operations area, proceedings on enforcement matters unless all parties otherwise agree and request the application of subpart N procedures, and proceedings for the direct or indirect control of an NRC license when the transfer requires prior approval of the NRC under the Commission's regulations, governing statutes, or pursuant to a license condition.
###### Editorial Note on Part 2

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

#### § 2.2 Subparts.

Each subpart other than subpart C of this part sets forth special rules applicable to the type of proceeding described in the first section of that subpart. Subpart C sets forth general rules applicable to all types of proceedings except rulemaking, and should be read in conjunction with the subpart governing a particular proceeding. Subpart I of this part sets forth special procedures to be followed in proceedings in order to safeguard and prevent disclosure of Restricted Data.

[69 FR 2233, Jan. 14, 2004]
H. Res. 346

In the House of Representatives, U.S., 

July 13, 2005.

Resolved, That at any time after the adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule 

XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of the 

Whole House on the state of the Union for consideration of 

the bill (H.R. 2864) to provide for the conservation and development of water and related resources, to authorize the 

Secretary of the Army to construct various projects for improvements to rivers and harbors of the United States, and 

for other purposes. The first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. All points of order against consideration of the 

bill are waived. General debate shall be confined to the bill 

and shall not exceed one hour equally divided and controlled 

by the chairman and ranking minority member of the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure. After general 

debate the bill shall be considered for amendment under the 

five-minute rule. It shall be in order to consider as an original bill for the purpose of amendment under the five-minute 

rule the amendment in the nature of a substitute rec-
2

•HRES 346 EH 

ommended by the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure now printed in the bill. The committee amendment 

in the nature of a substitute shall be considered as read. All 

points of order against the committee amendment in the nature of a substitute are waived. Notwithstanding clause 11 of 

rule XVIII, no amendment to the committee amendment in 

the nature of a substitute shall be in order except those printed in the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying 

this resolution. Each such amendment may be offered only in 

the order printed in the report, may be offered only by a 

Member designated in the report, shall be considered as read, 

shall be debatable for the time specified in the report equally 

divided and controlled by the proponent and an opponent, 

shall not be subject to amendment, and shall not be subject 

to a demand for division of the question in the House or in 

the Committee of the Whole. All points of order against such 

amendments are waived. At the conclusion of consideration of 

the bill for amendment the Committee shall rise and report 

the bill to the House with such amendments as may have 

been adopted. Any Member may demand a separate vote in 

the House on any amendment adopted in the Committee of 

the Whole to the bill or to the committee amendment in the 

nature of a substitute. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to final 
3

•HRES 346 EH 

passage without intervening motion except one motion to recommit with or without instructions. 

Attest:

Clerk.
#### § 14.25 Amending a claim.

The claimant may amend a claim presented in compliance with 10 CFR 14.13 at any time prior to final agency action or prior to the exercise of the claimant's option under 28 U.S.C. 2675(a). The claimant or his or her duly authorized agent or legal representative shall sign each amendment and submit it in writing. Upon the timely filing of an amendment to a pending claim, the agency shall have six months in which to make a final disposition of the claim as amended and the claimant's option under 28 U.S.C. 2675(a) does not accrue until six months after the filing of an amendment.
Subpart 1216.2—Fixed-Price Contracts

Parent topic: PART 1216—TYPES OF CONTRACTS

1216.203 Fixed-price contracts with economic price

adjustment.

1216.203-4 Contract clauses.

1216.203-470 Solicitation provision.

The contracting officer shall insert the provision at 1252.216–70, Evaluation of Offers Subject to an

Economic Price Adjustment Clause, in solicitations containing an economic price adjustment clause.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

V. ) Case No.: 2:06-mj-082-SRW

)

KIMBERLY JOYCE SELLERS )

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE

COMES NOW the undersigned counsel, Michael J. Petersen, and enters his appearance

on behalf of Defendant, Kimberly Joyce Sellers, in the above-styled case.

Dated this 22 day of August 2006. nd

Respectfully submitted,

s/ Michael J. Petersen

MICHAEL J. PETERSEN

Assistant Federal Defender

201 Monroe Street, Suite 407

Montgomery, Alabama 36104

Phone: (334) 834-2099

Fax: (334) 834-0353

E-mail: michael_petersen@fd.org

ASB-5072-E48M

Case 2:06-mj-00082-SRW Document 8 Filed 08/22/2006 Page 1 of 2
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

V. ) Case No.: 2:06-mj-082-SRW

)

KIMBERLY JOYCE SELLERS )

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on August 22, 2006, I electronically filed the foregoing with the

Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of such filing to the

following: 

David E. Cooke, Esquire

Assistant United States Attorney 

One Court Square, Suite 201

Montgomery, Alabama 36104

Respectfully submitted,

s/ Michael J. Petersen

MICHAEL J. PETERSEN

Assistant Federal Defender

201 Monroe Street, Suite 407

Montgomery, Alabama 36104

Phone: (334) 834-2099

Fax: (334) 834-0353

E-mail: michael_petersen@fd.org

ASB-5072-E48M

Case 2:06-mj-00082-SRW Document 8 Filed 08/22/2006 Page 2 of 2
Subpart 1832.1—Financing for Other Than a

Commercial Purchase

Parent topic: PART 1832—CONTRACT FINANCING

1832.111 Contractor clauses for other than commercial

purchases.

1832.111-70 NASA contract clause.

The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 1852.232–79, Payment for On-Site Preparatory

Costs, in solicitations and contracts for construction on a fixed-price basis when progress payments

are contemplated and pro rata payment of on-site preparatory costs to the contractor is appropriate.
157 So.2d 230

#### SHREVEPORT AUTO FINANCE CORPORATION v. SOUTHWESTERN IRON CORPORATION.

No. 46928.

Nov. 12, 1963.

In re: Southwestern Iron Corporation applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, Parish of Caddo. 155 So.2d 71.

Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal wc find no error of law in its judgment.
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the accompanying
Quarterly Report of Centenary International Corporation (the “Company”) on Form
10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Carlos Fabian De
Sousa, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge:





(1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





/s/ Carlos Fabian De
  SousaCarlos
      Fabian De SousaChief
      Financial OfficerMay
      21, 2010





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.  The
foregoing certifications are accompanying the Company's Form 10-Q solely
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and are not
being filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure
document.
§ 1303.112 Denials. ( a ) When denying a request in any respect, the Board shall notify the requestor of that determination in writing. The types of denials include: ( 1 ) Denials of requests, consisting of a determination: ( i ) To withhold any requested record in whole or in part;
( ii ) That a requested record does not exist or cannot be located;
( iii ) That a record is not readily reproducible in the form or format sought;
( iv ) That what has been requested is not a record subject to the FOIA; and
( v ) That the material requested is not a Board record (e.g., material produced by another agency or organization).
( 2 ) A determination on any disputed fee matter, including a denial of a request for a fee waiver.
( 3 ) A denial of a request for expedited processing.
( b ) The denial letter shall be signed by the Director of Administration, the Deputy Director, or their designee, and shall include all of the following: ( 1 ) The name and title of the person responsible for the denial.
( 2 ) A brief statement of the reason(s) for the denial, including any FOIA exemptions applied in denying the request.
( 3 ) An estimate of the volume of records withheld, in number of pages or in some other reasonable form of estimation. This estimate does not need to be provided if it would harm an interest protected by an applicable exemption.
( 4 ) A statement that the denial may be appealed under § 1303.114 and a description of the requirements of § 1303.114.
806.501 Requirement.       The Associate Executive Director, Office of Procurement Policy, Systems and Oversight (AED, PPSO) is designated as the VA Advocate for Competition for the agency. The AED, PPSO may further delegate the authority in this section to appoint an alternate agency advocate for competition and shall designate procuring activity advocates for competition in accordance with FAR 6.501. A complete list of VA procuring activity advocates for competition can be found at  *https://www.va.gov/oal/business/pps/competition-advocates.asp.*    **Parent topic:** Subpart 806.5 - Advocates for Competition
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9
<LEGEND>
     This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from our
     March 31, 1999 10-QSB and is qualified in its entirety by reference
     to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           9,839
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     33,681
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          14,894
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            15,031
<LOANS>                                         92,097
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,013
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 157,740
<DEPOSITS>                                     134,467
<SHORT-TERM>                                     2,075
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                938
<LONG-TERM>                                      5,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         4,633
<OTHER-SE>                                      10,628
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 149,953
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  1,941
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  681
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    57
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 2,679
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               1,127
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,191
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            1,489
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                       90
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                    926
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    680
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         680
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                         (114)
<NET-INCOME>                                       348
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.58
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.58
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.42
<LOANS-NON>                                        373
<LOANS-PAST>                                        23
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   109
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   940
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       20
<RECOVERIES>                                         2
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,012
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,012
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        



</TABLE>
1852.000 Scope of part.       This part, in conjunction with FAR part 52—          (a) Sets forth the provisions and clauses prescribed in the NFS,          (b) Gives instructions for their use, and          (c) Presents a matrix listing the provisions and clauses applicable to each principal contract type and/or purpose (e.g., fixed-price supply, cost-reimbursement research and development).    **Parent topic:** PART 1852—SOLICITATION PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT CLAUSES
#### § 170.51 Right to dispute assessed fees.

All debtors' disputes of fees assessed must be submitted in accordance with 10 CFR 15.31.

[86 FR 32176, June 16, 2021]
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK>        0000764843
<NAME> SEDONA CORP.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                             970
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,464
<ALLOWANCES>                                       143
<INVENTORY>                                      1,043
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,457
<PP&E>                                           4,366
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,288
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   4,850
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,422
<BONDS>                                            145
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      4,927
<COMMON>                                       (1,781)
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     4,850
<SALES>                                            593
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   593
<CGS>                                              647
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      647
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,552
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  26
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,632)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,632)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                           97
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,729)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.08)
        





</TABLE>
PGI 208.405-6 Limiting sources.

For an order or blanket purchase agreement (BPA) exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold

that is a follow-on to an order or BPA for the same supply or services previously issued based on a

limiting sources justification citing the authority at FAR 8.405-6(a)(1)(i)(B) or (C)—

(1) The limited sources justification shall include a copy of the previous justification to assist the

approval authority in determining whether the planned actions to remove any barriers that led to the

restricted consideration cited on the previous justification were completed; and

(2) The approval authority shall determine whether the planned actions were completed. If the

actions were not completed, the justification for the follow-on action must be approved by the

approval authority one-level above the approval authority for the previous justification (see FAR

8.405-6(d)). If the previous justification was approved by the Senior Procurement Executive (SPE),

the approval remains at the SPE level.

Parent topic: PGI 208.405 Reserved