alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-6823

JACK MCRAE, Petitioner - Appellant, versus DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PAROLE BOARD; DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS; UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge. (CA-01-283-3) Submitted: August 29, 2002 Decided: September 23, 2002 Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jack McRae, Appellant Pro Se. Joan Elizabeth Evans, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia; Carol Paskin Epstein, Michael Alan Stern, ASSISTANT CORPORATION COUNSEL, D.C., Washington, D.C., for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Jack McRae seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and conclude on the reasoning of the district court that McRae has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See McRae v. D.C. Parole Bd. , No. CA-01-283-3 (E.D. Va. May 13, 2002). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
r J511O

V)0

(. Cct\ 2o6c,

z o9-

I scflOcc&bQ_. TV cc4jhonrcn

CL1 \O b TV 4 C Ot-v 22S

© \ 0 oc -ö \ x

rr'or 3 u Te- Lc *&*I2 c_ r LWrlc\ mLt3-/-

\\ñ R1j flz4

cx c 3 rrq Sn 4en cc T1 &v\

-Q -D Tfl(UL (O1

5 nOk c C fl ry

CLUC&CQ 1 jor

cubc'-

SCANNED

Case 2:06-cr-00209-MHT-CSC Document 49 Filed 07/15/2008 Page 1 of 2
1

Name

Reg.

Federal Medical Center, Carswell

P.O. Box 27137

Ft. Worth, TX 76127

3,t&t Thcpoc

AL3(c4P-

.uQ

. 2008 --1

NI-uI'-

L.

c:c:;5

Case 2:06-cr-00209-MHT-CSC Document 49 Filed 07/15/2008 Page 2 of 2
#### § 1707.209 Procedure when a decision is not made prior to the time a response is required.

If a response to a demand or request is required before the General Counsel can make the determination referred to in § 1707.201, the General Counsel, when necessary, will provide the court or other competent authority with a copy of this part, inform the court or other competent authority that the demand or request is being reviewed, and seek a stay of the demand or request pending a final determination.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>6
<LEGEND> THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED 
FROM THE FORM 10-Q AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS 
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
<MULTIPLIER>1
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                  SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-TYPE>                       9-MOS
<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST>             985,278
<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE>            791,526
<RECEIVABLES>                           0
<ASSETS-OTHER>                     46,589
<OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS>                3,489
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                    841,604
<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES>                0
<SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT>                 0
<OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES>         132,552
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES>               132,552
<SENIOR-EQUITY>                         0
<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON>          902,804
<SHARES-COMMON-STOCK>             106,392
<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR>             109,904
<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT>               0
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII>                  0
<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS>                 0
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS>                0
<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC>         (193,752)
<NET-ASSETS>                      709,052
<DIVIDEND-INCOME>                       0
<INTEREST-INCOME>                   4,706
<OTHER-INCOME>                          0
<EXPENSES-NET>                    330,002
<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME>          (325,296)
<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT>           44,466
<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT>          41,754
<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS>            (239,076)
<EQUALIZATION>                          0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME>               0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS>                0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER>                   0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD>                 0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED>         3,512
<SHARES-REINVESTED>                     0
<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS>           (263,660)
<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR>                 0
<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR>               0
<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR>                 0
<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR>              0
<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES>              12,789
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      0
<GROSS-EXPENSE>                   332,962
<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS>              840,882
<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN>                  11
<PER-SHARE-NII>                        (2)
<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC>                 0 <F1>
<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND>                    0
<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS>               0
<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL>                    0
<PER-SHARE-NAV-END>                     9
<EXPENSE-RATIO>                      39.2
<AVG-DEBT-OUTSTANDING>                  0
<AVG-DEBT-PER-SHARE>                    0
<FN>
A zero value is used since the change in net unrealized fair value is not 
allocated to General Partners and Limited Partners as it is not taxable.  
Only taxable gains or losses are allocated in accordance with the 
Partnership Agreement.
</FN>

</TABLE>
#### In the Matter of Steel Los III/Goya Foods, Inc., Respondent, v Board of Assessors of County of Nassau et al., Appellants, and Bethpage Union Free School District, Intervenor-Respondent. Bethpage Union Free School District et al., Respondents, v Nassau County et al., Appellants, and Goya Foods, Inc., Respondent.

(Matter No. 1.)

(Matter No. 2.)

Submitted October 1, 2007;

decided October 23, 2007

Reported below, 35 AD3d 482.

Motion by Port Washington Union Free School District for leave to appear amicus curiae on the appeal herein denied.
§ 1015.211 Collection in installments. ( a ) Whenever feasible, DOE shall collect the total amount of a debt in one lump sum. If a debtor is financially unable to pay a debt in one lump sum, DOE may accept payment in regular installments. DOE will obtain a current financial statement showing the debtor's assets, liabilities, income, and expenses from debtors who represent that they are unable to pay in one lump sum, and independently verify such representations whenever possible. DOE may also obtain credit reports or other financial information to assess installment requests. DOE may use its own financial information form or a DOJ form, such as the Financial Statement of Debtor (OBD-500) (see § 1015.302(g) of this part). When DOE agrees to accept payments in regular installments, it will obtain a legally enforceable, written agreement from the debtor that specifies all of the terms of the arrangement and that contains a provision accelerating the debt in the event of default.
( b ) The size and frequency of installment payments should bear a reasonable relation to the size of the debt and the debtor's ability to pay. If possible, the installment payments should be sufficient in size and frequency to liquidate the debt in three years or less.
( c ) Security for deferred payments should be obtained in appropriate cases. DOE may accept installment payments notwithstanding the refusal of the debtor to execute a written agreement or to give security, at DOE's option.
----- Forwarded by Melanie King/RTP/USEPA/US on 08/02/2010 10:35 PM

-----

|------------>

| From: |

|------------>

>---------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------------|

|"Higgins, Cortney" <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov>

|

>---------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------------|

|------------>

| To: |

|------------>

>---------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------------|

|Melanie King/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

|

>---------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------------|

|------------>

| Cc: |

|------------>

>---------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------------|

|RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

|

>---------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------------|

|------------>

| Date: |

|------------>

>---------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------------|

|08/02/2010 03:51 PM

|

>---------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------------|

|------------>

| Subject: |

|------------>

>---------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------------|

|Additional Interagency Comments on RICE Rule

|

>---------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----------------------------------------------------------------|

Hi Melanie,

Attached are additional interagency comments on the RICE rule. Please let me

know if you have any questions and whether we need a call to discuss these

comments.

Furthermore, could you send over the following materials:

- Emissions Factors Data and Information

- Guidance on Excluded Facilities from Inventory

Regards,

Cortney

(See attached file:

InteragencyWorkingCommentsonEPA_RICE_SI_EO12866Review_08022010.pdf)
Part 5622 - APPLICATION OF LABOR LAWS TO GOVERNMENT ACQUISITIONS       5622.001 DEFINITIONS                                          Subpart 5622.1 - BASIC LABOR POLICIES                                                         5622.103 Overtime.                                                                           5622.103-4 Approvals.    5622.001 DEFINITIONS    *(Added January 2015)*       The “Agency Labor Advisor” is an individual responsible for advising contracting agency officials on Federal contract labor matters. The Agency Labor Advisor for USSOCOM is the Air Force Labor Advisor (Eastern Region) who can be reached at http://www.wdol.gov/ala.aspx.Subpart 5622.1 - BASIC LABOR POLICIES    *(Added May 2014)* 5622.103 Overtime.     5622.103-4 Approvals.    (a) The contracting officer is designated the agency approving official.              HQ, United States Special Operations Command       Special Operations Forces Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics (SOF AT&L-K)       SOFARS 5622       February 2014
§ 217.72 Compulsory process. ( a ) If a person refuses to permit a duly authorized representative of the Department of Energy to have access to any premises or source of information necessary to the administration or the enforcement of the Defense Production Act and other applicable statutes, this part, or official actions, the Department of Energy representative may seek compulsory process. Compulsory process means the institution of appropriate legal action, including ex parte application for an inspection warrant or its equivalent, in any forum of appropriate jurisdiction.
( b ) Compulsory process may be sought in advance of an audit, investigation, or other inquiry, if, in the judgment of the Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Department of Energy overseeing the Defense Production Act program, as listed in § 217.93, there is reason to believe that a person will refuse to permit an audit, investigation, or other inquiry, or that other circumstances exist which make such process desirable or necessary.
[76 FR 33619, June 9, 2011, as amended at 85 FR 31670, May 27, 2020]
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

)

In the Matter of the Extradition of )

MARIA del ROSARIO MORENO-VAZQUEZ ) 3:06-CV-761-MEF-CSC

a/k/a MARIA COONLEY )

)

 

United States’s Motion to Permit Filing

The United States respectfully moves this Court to permit the filing of its

Supplemental Reply Extradition Brief (Doc. No. 42), which has being filed approximately

13 minutes after its due date. 

Respectfully submitted this 2nd day of July, 2008,

LEURA G. CANARY

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

/s/ Christopher Snyder 

CHRISTOPHER A. SNYDER

Assistant United States Attorney

131 Clayton Street

Montgomery, AL 36104

Phone: (334) 223-7280

Fax: (334) 223-7135

E-mail: christopher.a.snyder@usdoj.gov

Certificate of Service

I hereby certify that on July 2, 2008, I electronically filed the foregoing with the

Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system, which will send notification of such filing

to the following: Ben Elton Bruner. 

/s/ Christopher Snyder

CHRISTOPHER A. SNYDER

Case 3:06-cv-00761-CSC Document 43 Filed 07/02/2008 Page 1 of 1
§ 97.402 Service of papers. ( a ) Every paper required to be served on opposing parties and filed in the Office in any priority, protest, or appeal proceeding, must be served by the Secretary in the manner provided in § 97.403.
( b ) The requirement in certain sections that a specified paper shall be served includes a requirement that all related supporting papers shall also be served. Proof of such service upon other parties to the proceeding must be made before the supporting papers will be considered by the Commissioner or Secretary.
Subpart 816.1 [Reserved]

Parent topic: PART 816 - TYPES OF CONTRACTS
Subpart 2451.70 - Contractor Use of

Government Discount Travel Rates

Parent topic: PART 2451 - USE OF GOVERNMENT SOURCES BY CONTRACTORS

2451.7001 Contract clause.

The Contracting Officer shall insert the clause at 48 CFR 2452.251-70, Contractor Employee Travel,

in cost-reimbursement solicitations and contracts involving contractor travel.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v. ) CASE NO. 2:06-CR-209-WKW

 )

BRIDGET Y. TAYLOR )

ORDER

It is ORDERED that the sentencing in this matter, previously scheduled for January 22, 2007,

is continued generally.

DONE this 19th day of January, 2007.

 /s/ W. Keith Watkins 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cr-00209-MHT-CSC Document 31 Filed 01/19/2007 Page 1 of 1
Subpart 1837.1—Service Contracts—General

Parent topic: PART 1837—SERVICE CONTRACTING

1837.101 Definitions.

Pension portability means the recognition and continuation in a successor service contract of the

predecessor service contract employees' pension rights and benefits.

1837.104 Personal services contracts. (NASA supplements

paragraph (b))

(b) Section 203(c)(9) of the National Aeronautics and Space Act of 1958 (42 U.S.C. 2473(c)(9))

authorizes NASA “to obtain services as authorized by Section 3109 of Title 5, United States Code.” It

is NASA policy to obtain the personal services of experts and consultants by appointment rather than

by contract. The policies, responsibilities, and procedures pertaining to the appointment of experts

and consultants are in NPR 3300.1, Appointment of Personnel To/From NASA, Chapter 4,

Employment of Experts and Consultants.

1837.110 Solicitation provisions and contract clauses.

1837.110-70 NASA solicitation provision and contract

clauses.

(a) The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 1852.237–70, Emergency Evacuation

Procedures, in solicitations and contracts for on-site support services where emergency evacuations

of the NASA installation may occur, e.g., snow, hurricanes, tornadoes, earthquakes, or other

emergencies.

(b) The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 1852.237–71, Pension Portability, in

solicitations, contracts or negotiated contract modifications for additional work when the

procurement officer makes the determination in 1837.170(a)(2).

1837.170 Pension portability.

(a) It is NASA's policy not to require pension portability in service contracts. However, pension

portability requirements may be included in solicitations, contracts, or contract modifications for

additional work under the following conditions:

(1)
(i) There is a continuing need for the same or similar services for a minimum of five years (inclusive

of options), and, if the contractor changes, a high percentage of the predecessor contractor's

employees are expected to remain with the program; or

(ii) The employees under a predecessor contract were covered by a portable pension plan, a followon contract or a contract consolidating existing services is awarded, and the total contract period

covered by the plan covers a minimum of five years (including both the predecessor and successor

contracts); and

(2) The procurement officer determines in writing, with full supporting rationale, that such a

requirement is in the Government's best interest. The procurement officer shall maintain a record of

all such determinations.

(b) When pension portability is required, the plan shall comply with the requirements of the clause

at 1852.237–71, Pension Portability, (see 1837.110–70(b)), and the contract shall also include a clear

description of the plan, including service, pay, liabilities, vesting, termination, and benefits from

prior contracts.
SUBCHAPTER B - ACQUISITION PLANNING

PART 2105 - PUBLICIZING CONTRACT ACTIONS

PART 2106 - COMPETITION REQUIREMENTS

PART 2109 - CONTRACTOR QUALIFICATIONS

PART 2110 - SPECIFICATIONS, STANDARDS, AND OTHER PURCHASE

DESCRIPTIONS

PART 2105 - PUBLICIZING CONTRACT ACTIONS

Subpart 2105.70 - Applicability

2105.7001 Applicability.

PART 2106 - COMPETITION REQUIREMENTS

Subpart 2106.70 - Applicability

2106.7001 Applicability.

PART 2109 - CONTRACTOR QUALIFICATIONS

Subpart 2109.4 - Debarment, Suspension, and Ineligibility

2109.408 Certification regarding debarment, suspension, proposed debarment and

other responsibility matters.

2109.409 Certification and contract clause.

Subpart 2109.70 - Minimum Standards for FEGLI Program Contractors

2109.7001 Minimum standards for FEGLI Program contractors.

PART 2110 - SPECIFICATIONS, STANDARDS, AND OTHER PURCHASE DESCRIPTIONS

Subpart 2110.70 - Contract Specifications

2110.7000 Scope of subpart.

2110.7001 Definitions.

2110.7002 Contractor investment of FEGLI Program funds.

2110.7003 Significant events.

2110.7004 Contract clauses.
Case 2:06-cv-00690-MEF-SRW Document 1 Filed 08/04/2006 Page 1 of 7
Case 2:06-cv-00690-MEF-SRW Document 1 Filed 08/04/2006 Page 2 of 7
Case 2:06-cv-00690-MEF-SRW Document 1 Filed 08/04/2006 Page 3 of 7
Case 2:06-cv-00690-MEF-SRW Document 1 Filed 08/04/2006 Page 4 of 7
Case 2:06-cv-00690-MEF-SRW Document 1 Filed 08/04/2006 Page 5 of 7
Case 2:06-cv-00690-MEF-SRW Document 1 Filed 08/04/2006 Page 6 of 7
Case 2:06-cv-00690-MEF-SRW Document 1 Filed 08/04/2006 Page 7 of 7
# Subpart 2403.1 - Safeguards

**Parent topic:**PART 2403 - IMPROPER BUSINESS PRACTICES AND PERSONAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

## 2403.101 Standards of conduct.

Detailed rules which apply to the conduct of HUD employees are set forth in 5 CFR part 2635 and 5 CFR part 7501.
#### § 19.4 Interpretations.

Except as specifically authorized by the Commission in writing, no interpretation of the meaning of the regulations in this part by any officer or employee of the Commission other than a written interpretation by the General Counsel will be recognized to be binding upon the Commission.
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

In connection with the foregoing Annual Report on Form 10-K to be filed with
the Washington, D.C. Office of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, we hereby consent to the inclusion of our report dated May 28, 2009 related to the audit of the financial statements of IPtimize, Inc. as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2008.



|                 |  |  |  |                             
|---------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------------
|Denver, Colorado |  |  |  | /s/ Ronald R. Chadwick, P.C.

May 29, 2009
§ 986.47 Alternate members. ( a ) Each member of the Council shall have an alternate member to be nominated in the same manner as the member.
( b ) An alternate for a member of the Council shall act in the place and stead of such member in their absence or in the event of their death, removal, resignation, or disqualification, until the next nomination and elections take place for the Council or the vacancy has been filled pursuant to § 986.48, Eligibility.
( c ) In the event any member of the Council and their alternate are both unable to attend a meeting of the Council, any alternate for any other member representing the same group as the absent member may serve in the place of the absent member.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

 v. )

)

 HECTOR R. SILVA ) CR. NO. 2:06CR200-WHA

O R D E R

The defendant by consent has appeared before a United States Magistrate Judge and has

entered a plea of guilty. The Magistrate Judge has accepted the plea of guilty and has adjudicated

the defendant guilty. Accordingly, it is ORDERED as follows:

1. That sentencing of the defendant be, and the same is, hereby set on March 21, 2007, at

9:00 a.m. in the Frank M. Johnson, Jr. United States Courthouse Complex, One Church Street,

Montgomery, Alabama.

2. That in accordance with Rule 32(f)(1), Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, on or

before February 28, 2007, counsel for the defendant and the Government shall communicate in

writing to the probation officer, and to each other, any objections they have as to any material

information, sentencing classifications, sentencing guideline ranges, and policy statements contained

in or omitted from the presentence report. Any motion for downward departure shall be filed on

or before the conference date with the probation officer, unless based on unknown and

unforeseen circumstances arising after that date, in which case the motion must be filed

promptly upon discovery of such circumstances.

3. That, unless excused in writing by the Chief U.S. Probation Officer of this district,

counsel for the parties shall be available for a conference with the probation officer on March 1,

2007, at 9:00 a.m., to discuss and resolve, if possible, factual and legal issues contained in the

presentence report. If the probation officer determines or if any of the parties request that a personal

meeting be held to resolve the issues, such meeting shall be at the U.S. Probation Office, Frank

M. Johnson, Jr. Federal Courthouse and Building, 15 Lee Street, Montgomery, AL, 36104 on

the above date and time. Such request for a personal conference shall be made to the probation

officer within five (5) calendar days after receipt of the presentence report. Otherwise, the

conference shall be held telephonically. 

Nothing contained in this Order shall be construed as impairing the rights of any party as

established in the Constitution or laws of the United States.

DONE this 11th day of December , 2006.

 /s/ W. Harold Albritton 

 Senior United States District Judge

Case 2:06-cr-00200-WHA-CSC Document 91 Filed 12/11/2006 Page 1 of 1