alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
MINUTES

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, SOUTHERN DIVISION

HON. SUSAN RUSS WALKER, MAG JUDGE AT MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA

DATE COMMENCED: October 27, 2006 3:09 p.m.

DATE COMPLETED: October 27, 2006 3:39 p.m.

1:06-cv-00737-WKW-SRW Nails v. Dothan Rescue Mission(MAG+) 

PRO SE Angela Denise Nails (Plaintiff)

James K. Walding representing Dothan Rescue Mission (Defendant)

__________________________________________________________________________________________

PLAINTIFF APPEARANCES: DEFENDANT

*

Angela Denise Nails, pro se (by telephone) * James K. Walding

*

____________________________________________ *____________________________________________

COURT OFFICIALS PRESENT:

Joyce Taylor, Courtroom Deputy

PROCEEDINGS:

SCHEDULING CONFERENCE

3:09 p.m. Court convenes.

Court’s questions and plaintiff’s statements as to the basis for this lawsuit.

Discussions regarding claims.

Court’s questions and plaintiff’s statements regarding clarification of claims.

Court’s questions and plaintiff’s statements regarding disability claims.

Court’s questions and plaintiff’s statements as to relief seeking from claims.

Court’s questions and plaintiff’s statements regarding mental anguish damages and what

services plaintiff desires at the mission (store & food kitchen).

Court’s questions and plaintiff’s statements regarding plaintiff being barred from

mission.

Court’s questions and plaintiff’s statements regarding whether or not mission is privately

or government funded.

Court’s questions and plaintiff’s statement that she will continue to represent herself.

Court’s questions and plaintiff’s statements regarding law.

Court discussions regarding scheduling of this case and explanations to plaintiff each

deadlines to be set out in Scheduling Order and that written Order will follow:

Dispositive motions due January 29, 2007

Motions to amend due November 28, 2006

All discovery completed by March 1, 2007

Case 1:06-cv-00737-WKW-SRW Document 15 Filed 10/27/2006 Page 1 of 2
Face to face settlement conference within 14 days after dispositive motions are

due.

Any objections to deadlines to be filed within 14 days from the date of the

Scheduling Order.

Court's statements to plaintiff regarding motions that may be filed re: motions to

dismiss and motions for summary judgment.

Parties have no further questions or statements for the court.

3:39 p.m. Court recessed.

Case 1:06-cv-00737-WKW-SRW Document 15 Filed 10/27/2006 Page 2 of 2
Case 2:06-cr-00209-MHT-CSC Document 4 Filed 08/30/2006 Page 1 of 1
#### In the Matter of the Arbitration between All State Tax Service of Area 5, Inc., Appellant, and Kerekes Bros., Inc., Respondent.

Order entered on July 30, 1968, unanimously modified on the law, with $30 costs and disbursements to appellant, so as to deny the motion for a stay in its entirety and to direct that the arbitration proceed on all claims asserted in the demand for arbitration. The agreement, which contains a broad arbitration clause, also contains a restrictive covenant, which forms the basis of claimant’s arbitration proceeding. “ Where there is a broad provision for arbitration, such as we have here, arbitration may be had as to all issues arising under the contract [citing cases] ”. *(Matter of Exer cycle Corp.*[Maratta], 9 N Y 2d 329, 336.) The question of the validity or invalidity of the restrictive covenant is not one involving public policy and does not involve positive violations of legislative enactments requiring the enjoining of arbitration. *(Matter of Exer cycle, supra,*p. 335.) What is involved is merely a claim of illegality based upon common-law grounds. Such an issue is for the arbitrator. *(Matter of Aimcee Wholesale Corp. [Tomar Prods.],*21 N Y 2d 621.) Concur — Eager, J. P., Capozzoli, McGivern and Markewich, JJ.
#### Farrell M. Fleming et al., Respondents, v Ramesh Sarva et al., Appellants.

[813 NYS2d 683]

Appeal by the defendants, as limited by their brief, from stated portions of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Austin, J.), dated November 15, 2004.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs, for reasons stated by Justice Austin in the Supreme Court. Goldstein, J.P., Luciano, Rivera and Fisher, JJ., concur. *[See*5 Misc 3d 1017(A), 2004 NY Slip Op 51409(U) (2004).]
831.7001-6 Reimbursement for other

supplies and services.

VA will provide reimbursement for other services and assistance that may be authorized under

applicable provisions of 38 U.S.C. chapter 31 regulations, including, but not limited to, employment

and self-employment services, initial and extended evaluation services, and independent living

services.

Parent topic: Subpart 831.70 - Contract Cost Principles and Procedures for Veterans Services
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 159 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 159

     Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on House 
           Administration in the One Hundred Ninth Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 16, 2005

    Mr. Ney (for himself and Ms. Millender-McDonald) submitted the 
  following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on House 
                             Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
     Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on House 
           Administration in the One Hundred Ninth Congress.

    Resolved, 

SECTION 1. AMOUNTS FOR COMMITTEE EXPENSES.

    For the expenses of the Committee on House Administration 
(hereafter in this resolution referred to as the ``Committee''), 
including the expenses of all staff salaries, there shall be paid, out 
of the applicable accounts of the House of Representatives for 
committee salaries and expenses, not more than $10,101,152 for the One 
Hundred Ninth Congress.

SEC. 2. SESSION LIMITATIONS.

    Of the amount specified in section 1--
            (1) not more than $4,822,199 shall be available for 
        expenses incurred during the period beginning at noon on 
        January 3, 2005, and ending immediately before noon on January 
        3, 2006; and
            (2) not more than $5,278,953 shall be available for 
        expenses incurred during the period beginning at noon on 
        January 3, 2006, and ending immediately before noon on January 
        3, 2007.

SEC. 3. VOUCHERS.

    Payments under this resolution shall be made on vouchers authorized 
by the Committee, signed by the Chairman of the Committee, and approved 
in the manner directed by the Committee on House Administration.

SEC. 4. REGULATIONS.

    Amounts made available under this resolution shall be expended in 
accordance with regulations prescribed by the Committee on House 
Administration.
                                 <all>
```
Subpart 1646.2—Contract Quality

Requirements

Parent topic: PART 1646—QUALITY ASSURANCE

1646.201 Contract Quality Policy.

(a) This section prescribes general policies and procedures to ensure that services acquired under

the FEHB contract conform to the contract's quality and audit requirements.

(b) OPM will periodically evaluate the contractor's system of internal controls under the quality

assurance program required by the contract and will acknowledge in writing whether or not the

system is consistent with the requirements set forth in the contract. After the initial review,

subsequent reviews may be limited to changes in the contractor's internal control guidelines.

However, a limited review does not diminish the contractor's obligation to apply the full internal

control system.

(c) OPM will issue specific quality performance standards for the FEHB contracts and will inform

carriers of the applicable standards prior to negotiations for the contract year. OPM will benchmark

its standards against standards generally accepted in the insurance industry. The contracting officer

may authorize nationally recognized standards to be used to fulfill this requirement. FEHB carriers

will comply with the performance standards issued by OPM.

(d) In addition to reviewing carriers' quality assurance programs, OPM will periodically audit

contractors, subcontractors and Large Providers' books and records to assure compliance with

FEHB law, regulations, and the contract.
§ 13.32 Location of hearing. ( a ) The hearing may be held— ( 1 ) In any judicial district of the United States in which the defendant resides or transacts business;
( 2 ) In any judicial district of the United States in which the claim or statement in issue was made; or
( 3 ) In such other place as may be agreed upon by the defendant and the ALJ.
( b ) Each party shall have the opportunity to present argument with respect to the location of the hearing.
( c ) The hearing shall be held at the place and at the time ordered by the ALJ.
#### The People of the State of New York, Appellant, v Ruben Luciano, Respondent.

Submitted November 26, 2007;

decided December 13, 2007

Reported below, 44 AD3d 123.

Motion for assignment of counsel granted and Robert S. Dean, Esq., Center for Appellate Litigation, 74 Trinity Place, 11th Floor, New York, NY 10006 assigned as counsel to the respondent on the appeal herein.
Editorial Note on Part 30
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 30 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

§ 30.33 General requirements for issuance of specific licenses. ( a ) An application for a specific license will be approved if: ( 1 ) The application is for a purpose authorized by the Act;
( 2 ) The applicant's proposed equipment and facilities are adequate to protect health and minimize danger to life or property;
( 3 ) The applicant is qualified by training and experience to use the material for the purpose requested in such manner as to protect health and minimize danger to life or property;
( 4 ) The applicant satisfies any special requirements contained in parts 32 through 37 and 39 of this chapter; and
( 5 ) In the case of an application for a license to receive and possess byproduct material for the conduct of any activity which the NRC determines will significantly affect the quality of the environment, the Director, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards or his/her designee, before commencement of construction of the plant or facility in which the activity will be conducted, on the basis of information filed and evaluations made pursuant to subpart A of part 51 of this chapter, has concluded, after weighing the environmental, economic, technical, and other benefits against environmental costs and considering available alternatives, that the action called for is the issuance of the proposed license, with any appropriate conditions to protect environmental values. Commencement of construction prior to such conclusion shall be grounds for denial of a license to receive and possess byproduct material in such plant or facility. Commencement of construction as defined in § 30.4 may include non-construction activities if the activity has a reasonable nexus to radiological safety and security.
( b ) Upon a determination that an application meets the requirements of the Act, and the regulations of the Commission, the Commission will issue a specific license authorizing the possession and use of byproduct material (Form NRC 374, “Byproduct Material License”).
[30 FR 8185, June 26, 1965, as amended at 36 FR 12731, July 7, 1971; 37 FR 5747, Mar. 21, 1972; 39 FR 26279, July 18, 1974; 43 FR 6922, Feb. 17, 1978; 49 FR 9403, Mar. 12, 1984; 52 FR 8241, Mar. 17, 1987; 58 FR 7736, Feb. 9, 1993; 73 FR 5717, Jan. 31, 2008; 76 FR 56962, Sept. 15, 2011; 78 FR 17006, Mar. 19, 2013]
§ 15.9 No private rights created. ( a ) The failure of NRC to include in this part any provision of the FCCS, 31 CFR Chapter IX, parts 900-904, does not prevent the NRC from applying these provisions.
( b ) A debtor may not use the failure of the NRC to comply with any provision of this part or of the Federal Claims Collections Standards as a defense.
[47 FR 7616, Feb. 22, 1982, as amended at 55 FR 32378, Aug. 9, 1990; 67 FR 30319, May 6, 2002]
4.9004 Procurement note.    As prescribed in DLAD 4.9000, use procurement note H17 for procurements involving FSC 5962 only that are equal to or under the micro-purchase threshold.       H17 RESTRICTION ON FSC 5962, ELECTRONIC MICROCIRCUITS (MAY 2022)       (a) Application. This procurement note shall apply only to actions at or under the micro-purchase threshold.       (b) Definitions. As used in this procurement note.       (1) “Covered Nation” means       (i) the Democratic People’s Republic of North Korea;       (ii) the People’s Republic of China;       (iii) the Russian Federation; and       (iv) the Islamic Republic of Iran.       (2) “Federal Supply Class (FSC) 5962, Electronic Microcircuit” means       (i) a small circuit having a high equivalent circuit element density, which is considered as a single part composed of interconnected elements placed and/or formed on or within a single substrate to perform an electronic circuit function. The elements may be formed on or within a semiconductor material substrate. They may consist of conductive 8 film(s) formed on an insulating substrate or may be a combination of one or both of these types with discrete elements;       (ii) designed specifically to generate, modify, or process electrical signals included in FSC 5962;       (iii) a supply class identified as being high-risk for counterfeiting; and       (iv) includes Integrated Circuit Devices; Integrated Circuit Modules, Integrated Electronic Devices: Hybrid, Magnetic, Molecular, Opto-Electronic, and Thin Film.       (c) Prohibition. The offeror represents by the submission of its quotation that it shall not propose to deliver FSC 5962, Electronic Microcircuits from a covered nation to the Government under this solicitation or any resulting contract. If the contracting officer is unable to determine whether the FSC 5962, Electronic Microcircuits is from a covered nation based on traceability documentation or other means on the offeror’s representation, as described above, then the award shall not be made to that offeror.       (d) Requirements. The awardee must also meet the following requirements:       (i) Provide post award traceability documentation. If the contracting officer is unable to obtain traceability accounting for 100% of the material, the contracting officer reserves the right to reject the material based on the above prohibition.       (ii) Obtain written contracting officer approval prior to shipment. **Parent topic:** SUBPART 4.90 – ELECTRONIC MICROCIRCUITS RESTRICTION
1 

### Daniels, Nia (FAA)

From: Daniels, Nia (FAA)

Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2015 8:51 AM

To: 'kquinn@pillsburylaw.com'

Cc: '333exemptions@faa.gov' ; Malecha, James (FAA) Subject: Request for Additional Information- In dustrial Skyworks USA, Inc. FAA-2014-1060



### April 23, 2015

Dear Mr. Quinn:

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA2014-1060). This information is necessary for the Fe deral Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

 A safety case is required for nighttime operations by Order 8900.1, Volume 16, Chapter 5, Section 3, Paragraph 16-5-3-7I. The required components of a sa fety case and safety case format may be found in Order 8900.1, Volume 16, Chapter 7, Section 1, Paragraph 16-7-1-3.

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit any proprietary information to the FAA Hea dquarters or electronically via e-mail to 333exemptions@faa.gov . If you want us to process your request a ny further, we must receive the information described above by May 7, 2015. If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

Nia Daniels Program Analyst

Nia Daniels, ARM

‐ 108

Federal Aviation Administration

Office of Rulemaking, Airmen & Airspace Rules Division

800 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20591

PH: (202) 267 ‐ 7626

Fax: (202) 267 ‐ 5075 nia.daniels@faa.gov
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15

- 41584 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
RICARDO ANASTACIO PEREZ , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 2:15

- CR

- 452

- 1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM , JONES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges

. PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Ricardo Anastacio
Perez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Perez h a s not filed a resp onse. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED October 1 8 , 2016

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 15-41584 Document: 00513722145 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/18/2016No. 15

- 41584

2 appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdra w is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 15-41584 Document: 00513722145 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/18/2016
Case 2:06-cv-00766-MHT-TFM Document 16 Filed 03/01/2007 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:06-cv-00766-MHT-TFM Document 16 Filed 03/01/2007 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:06-cv-00766-MHT-TFM Document 16 Filed 03/01/2007 Page 3 of 3
No. 76-1.

No. 76-11.

#### Taylor *v.*United States; and Hall *v.*United States.

C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari denied.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 114 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 114

  Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that a postage 
          stamp should be issued honoring American farm women.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           February 16, 2005

 Mr. Green of Wisconsin submitted the following resolution; which was 
             referred to the Committee on Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that a postage 
          stamp should be issued honoring American farm women.

Whereas American farm women have for centuries been critical to the survival of 
        the family farm;
Whereas in 1862 the newly formed Department of Agriculture released a study 
        showing that on 3 out of 4 farms the wife ``works harder'' and ``endures 
        more, than any other on the place'';
Whereas American farm women played an important role in the United States 
        victories in the World Wars, when they and their families took on even 
        greater responsibilities on the farms, maintaining the food and fiber 
        needs of our country as millions of men left the farms to fight in the 
        wars;
Whereas women have been actively involved in critical farm decisions, such as 
        the buying and selling of land and farm equipment, estate planning, and 
        developing new production practices; and
Whereas American farm women play an integral role in farm tasks, such as tending 
        to animals, field work, bookkeeping, and raising children: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved,  That it is the sense of the House of Representatives 
that--
            (1) the United States Postal Service should issue a postage 
        stamp honoring American farm women; and
            (2) the Citizens' Stamp Advisory Committee should recommend 
        to the Postmaster General that such a stamp be issued.
                                 <all>
```
335.072 Key personnel.

If the contracting officer determines that the personnel to be assigned to perform effort on an R&D

contract are critical to the success of the R&D effort, or were a critical factor in the award of the

contract, then the contracting officer should consider using the key personnel clause at 352.237-75,

Key Personnel.

Parent topic: PART 335 - RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CONTRACTING
----- Forwarded by Melanie King/RTP/USEPA/US on 08/02/2010 10:35 PM

----- |------------> | From: | |------------> >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------------------------------------| |"Higgins, Cortney" <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov> | >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------------------------------------| |------------> | To: | |------------> >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------------------------------------| |Melanie King/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA | >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------------------------------------| |------------> | Cc: | |------------> >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------------------------------------| |RobertJ Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA | >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------------------------------------| |------------> | Date: | |------------> >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------------------------------------| |08/02/2010 03:51 PM | >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------------------------------------| |------------> | Subject: | |------------> >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------------------------------------| |Additional Interagency Comments on RICE Rule | >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------------------------------------|

Hi Melanie, Attached are additional interagency comments on the RICE rule. Please let me know if you have any questions and whether we need a call to discuss these comments.

Furthermore, could you send over the following materials: - Emissions Factors Data and Information - Guidance on Excluded Facilities from Inventory

Regards, Cortney (See attached file: InteragencyWorkingCommentsonEPA_RICE_SI_EO12866Review_08022010.pdf)