alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

NORTHERN DIVISION 

CALVIN FLUKER, RICARDO ) 

WRIGHT, BERYL JACKSON, ) 

TRACEY MARTIN, LISA ) 

PITCHFORD, KIMBERLY LOVE, ) 

) 

Plaintiffs, ) 

) 

v. ) CIVIL ACTION NO.: 

) 2:06cv785-MHT 

U.S. FOODSERVICE, INC. and ) 

U.S. FOODSERVICE, INC. - ) 

MONTGOMERY DIVISION, ) 

) 

Defendants. ) 

DEFENDANT’S UNOPPOSED MOTION TO EXTEND

DEADLINE FOR FILING ITS RESPONSIVE PLEADING

Defendant U.S. Foodservice, Inc.

1

moves the Court to extend the time for it 

to file a responsive pleading from September 26, 2006 to October 10, 2006, for the 

following reasons: 

1. Defendant was served on September 6, 2006. The Complaint contains 

six plaintiffs and numerous factual allegations related to each individual plaintiff. 

Defendant needs additional time to investigate the allegations and formulate a 

response to the Complaint. 

 

1

Plaintiffs also named “U.S. Foodservice, Inc. – Montgomery Division” as a defendant. However, no such legal 

entity exists. 

Case 2:06-cv-00785-MHT-WC Document 5 Filed 09/25/2006 Page 1 of 3
2 

2. The undersigned contacted plaintiffs’ counsel, and plaintiffs do not 

oppose this Motion. 

3. Plaintiffs will not be prejudiced by this short extension. 

Respectfully submitted, 

s/ Tammy L. Baker 

Tammy L. Baker (ASB-9522-B62T) 

tbaker@constangy.com 

CONSTANGY, BROOKS & SMITH, LLC 

1819 Fifth Avenue North 

One Federal Place, Suite 900 

Birmingham, Alabama 35203 

Phone: (205) 226-5466 

Fax: (205) 323-7674 

ATTORNEY FOR DEFENDANTS, 

U.S. FOODSERVICE, INC. and 

U.S. FOODSERVICE, INC. – 

MONTGOMERY DIVISION 

Case 2:06-cv-00785-MHT-WC Document 5 Filed 09/25/2006 Page 2 of 3
3 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on September 25, 2006, I electronically filed the 

foregoing with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send 

notification of such filing to the following: 

Jon C. Goldfarb, Esq. 

Maury S. Weiner, Esq. 

Ethan R. Dettling, Esq. 

Wiggins, Childs, Quinn & Pantazis, LLC 

301 19th Street North 

Birmingham, Alabama 35203 

s/ Tammy L. Baker 

Tammy L. Baker 

Case 2:06-cv-00785-MHT-WC Document 5 Filed 09/25/2006 Page 3 of 3
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 14**  **- 6112** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

– Appellee ,
v. DAMON GERARD DICKERSON , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Baltimore
. Catherine C. Blake , District Judge. ( 1:09

- cr - 00402

- CCB

- 1; 1:12

- cv - 03484

- CCB )

Submitted : June 19, 2014 Decided: June 25, 2014

Before DUNCAN and DIAZ , Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
.

Damon Gerar d Dickerson, Appellant Pro Se. Judson T. Mihok, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Damon Gerard D ickerson seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 ( 2012 ) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.
§ 2253(c)(1) (B) (20 12 ). A certificat e of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (20 12 ). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasona ble jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed t he record and conclude that Dickerson has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal3 contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### § 13.40 Stays ordered by the Department of Justice.

If at any time the Attorney General or an Assistant Attorney General designated by the Attorney General transmits to the authority head a written finding that continuation of the administrative process described in this part with respect to a claim or statement may adversely affect any pending or potential criminal or civil action related to such claim or statement, the authority head shall stay the process immediately. The authority head may order the process resumed only upon receipt of the written authorization of the Attorney General.
Case 2:06-cv-00767-MEF-SRW Document 49 Filed 03/21/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:06-cv-00767-MEF-SRW Document 49 Filed 03/21/2007 Page 2 of 2
Case 2:06-cv-00767-MEF-SRW Document 49-2 Filed 03/21/2007 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 99(b)





Citizens Financial Corp.





Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley


Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350





I, Thomas K. Derbyshire, Vice President, Treasurer and Principal Financial Officer of Citizens Financial Corp. (the Company) certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 that:





|1. |  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




|2. |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




/s/    THOMAS K. DERBYSHIREThomas K. Derbyshire Vice President, Treasurer Principal Financial Officer





Date: 11/6/02




26
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary information extracted from Form 10-Q for the
quarterly period ended November 30, 1995 and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          AUG-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               NOV-30-1995
<CASH>                                           1,362
<SECURITIES>                                    45,703
<RECEIVABLES>                                   39,522
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,917
<INVENTORY>                                      1,628
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                96,077
<PP&E>                                         137,351
<DEPRECIATION>                                  34,759
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 209,796
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           64,900
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            11
<OTHER-SE>                                     132,493
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   209,796
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                37,513
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   33,685
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 258
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,618
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,847
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,771
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.25
        

</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Kurtis T. Wilder

Elizabeth T. Clement, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 September 28, 2018

Order 

Clerk

September 28, 2018

158019(108)

158020

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

SC: 158019

v COA: 336898

Wayne CC: 95-002388-FC

CHRISTOPHER WILEY,

Defendant-Appellee.

_________________________________________ 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

SC: 158020

v COA: 338870

Wayne CC: 92-014245-FC

WILLIAM RUCKER,

Defendant-Appellee.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of plaintiff-appellant to extend the time 

for filing its reply is GRANTED. The reply submitted on September 21, 2018, is accepted 

as timely filed.
Editorial Note on Part 2
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 2 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

§ 2.312 Notice of hearing. ( a ) In a proceeding in which the terms of a notice of hearing are not otherwise prescribed by this part, the order or notice of hearing will state: ( 1 ) The nature of the hearing and its time and place, or a statement that the time and place will be fixed by subsequent order;
( 2 ) The legal authority and jurisdiction under which the hearing is to be held;
( 3 ) The matters of fact and law asserted or to be considered; and
( 4 ) A statement describing the specific hearing procedures or subpart that will be used for the hearing.
( b ) The time and place of hearing will be fixed with due regard for the convenience of the parties or their representatives, the nature of the proceeding and the public interest.
[if !vml]>[endif]>
[if !vml]>[endif]>
You havereached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC)Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC.Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of catalogingand locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications.  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the eventthat publications are no longer available from the original publishing agencysite. (Historical purposes)
**Title:****Alabama NRCStech news**** 
SuDocNumber:A57.81/3-2:
ItemNumber:0120-A-25(online)
CGPSystem Number:000596979
 
2004
January
 
March
 
July
 
October
2005
January
 
April
 
August
 
December
2006
Spring
 
Fall
2007
Spring
 
Summer
2008
Winter
 
 
 **
§ 217.42 Examples of assistance. ( a ) While special priorities assistance may be provided for any reason in support of this part, it is usually provided in situations where: ( 1 ) A person is experiencing difficulty in obtaining delivery against a rated order by the required delivery date; or
( 2 ) A person cannot locate a supplier for an item or service needed to fill a rated order.
( b ) Other examples of special priorities assistance include: ( 1 ) Ensuring that rated orders receive preferential treatment by suppliers;
( 2 ) Resolving production or delivery conflicts between various rated orders;
( 3 ) Assisting in placing rated orders with suppliers;
( 4 ) Verifying the urgency of rated orders; and
( 5 ) Determining the validity of rated orders.
Editorial Note on Part 35
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 35 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

§ 35.491 Training for ophthalmic use of strontium-90. Except as provided in § 35.57, the licensee shall require the authorized user of strontium-90 for ophthalmic radiotherapy to be a physician who— ( a ) Is an authorized user under § 35.490 or equivalent Agreement State requirements; or
( b ) ( 1 ) Has completed 24 hours of classroom and laboratory training applicable to the medical use of strontium-90 for ophthalmic radiotherapy. The training must include— ( i ) Radiation physics and instrumentation;
( ii ) Radiation protection;
( iii ) Mathematics pertaining to the use and measurement of radioactivity; and
( iv ) Radiation biology; and
( 2 ) Supervised clinical training in ophthalmic radiotherapy under the supervision of an authorized user at a medical institution, clinic, or private practice that includes the use of strontium-90 for the ophthalmic treatment of five individuals. This supervised clinical training must involve— ( i ) Examination of each individual to be treated;
( ii ) Calculation of the dose to be administered;
( iii ) Administration of the dose; and
( iv ) Follow up and review of each individual's case history; and
( 3 ) Has obtained written attestation, signed by a preceptor authorized user who meets the requirements in § 35.57, § 35.490, § 35.491, or equivalent Agreement State requirements, that the individual has satisfactorily completed the requirements in paragraphs (b)(1) and (2) of this section and is able to independently fulfill the radiation safety-related duties as an authorized user of strontium-90 for ophthalmic use.
[67 FR 20370, Apr. 24, 2002, as amended at 68 FR 19326, Apr. 21, 2003; 71 FR 15011, Mar. 27, 2006; 74 FR 33906, July 14, 2009; 83 FR 33109, July 16, 2018]
§ 205.260 Purpose and scope. ( a ) The purpose of this section is to state the procedures that will be followed by the Economic Regulatory Administration of the Department of Energy in electricity export adjudications.
( b ) *Definitions.* As used in this subpart— *Administrator* means the Administrator of the Economic Regulatory Administration.
*Decisional employees* means the Administrator, presiding officers at adjudicatory hearings, and other employees of the Department, including consultants and contractors, who are, or may reasonably be expected to be, involved in the decision-making process, which includes advising the Administrator in resolving the issues in an adjudication. The term does not include those employees of the Department performing investigative or trial functions in an adjudication, unless they are specifically requested by the Administrator or his delegate to participate in the decision-making process.
*Department* means the Department of Energy.
*Off-the-record communication* means an *ex parte* communication, which is an oral or written communication relevant to the merits of an adjudication and not on the record and with respect to which reasonable prior notice to all participants and opportunity to be present at, or respond to, the communication is not given, but does not include a communication relating solely to procedures which are not relevant to the merits of the adjudication.
*Interested person* means a person outside the Department whose interest in the adjudication goes beyond the general interest of the public as a whole and includes applicants, intervenors, competitors of applicants, non-profit and public interest organizations, and other individuals and organizations, including state, local and other public officials, with a proprietary, financial or other special interest in the outcome of the adjudication. The term does not include other federal agencies, unless an agency is a participant in the adjudication.
*Participant* means any applicant or intervenor participating in the adjudication.
*Adjudication* means a formal proceeding employing procedures identical or similar to those required by the Administrative Procedure Act, as codified in 5 U.S.C. 551, 556, and 557, to consider an application to export electricity.
*Reasonable prior notice* means 7 days' written notice stating the nature and purpose of the communication.
*Relevant to the merits* means a communication directly related to the merits of a specific adjudication but does not include general background discussions about an entire industry or communications of a general nature made in the course of developing agency policy for future general application.
Subpart 1629.4—Contract Clauses

Parent topic: PART 1629—TAXES

1629.402 Foreign contracts.

The clause set forth in section 1652.229–70 shall be inserted in all FEHBP contracts performed

outside the United States, its possessions, and Puerto Rico.
§ 984.43 Powers. The Board shall have the following powers: ( a ) To administer the provisions of this part in accordance with its terms;
( b ) To make rules and regulations to effectuate the terms and provisions of this part;
( c ) To receive, investigate, and report to the Secretary complaints of violations of this part; and
( d ) To recommend to the Secretary amendments to this part.
2849.111 Review of proposed settlements.

The HCA or designee may establish procedures for the review and approval of settlement

agreements at a level above the contracting officer. In addition, all proposed termination settlements

shall be reviewed by legal counsel.

Parent topic: Subpart 2849.1 - General Principles
§ 97.9 Drawings and photographs. ( a ) Drawings or photographs submitted with an application shall disclose the distinctive characteristics of the variety.
( b ) Drawings or photographs shall be in color when color is a distinguishing characteristic of the variety, and the color shall be described by use of Nickerson's color fan, the Munsell Book of Color, the Royal Horticultural Society Colour Chart, or other recognized color chart.
( c ) Drawings shall be sent flat, or may be sent in a suitable mailing tube or by email in high resolution format, in accordance with instructions furnished by the Commissioner.
( d ) Drawings or photographs submitted with an application shall be retained by the Office as part of the application file.
[58 FR 42435, Aug. 9, 1993, as amended at 85 FR 431, Jan. 6, 2020]
2009.570-10 Remedies.

In addition to other remedies permitted by law or contract for a breach of the restrictions in this

subpart or for any intentional misrepresentation or intentional nondisclosure of any relevant interest

required to be provided for this section, the NRC may debar the contractor from subsequent NRC

contracts.

Parent topic: Subpart 2009.5 - Organizational Conflicts of Interest
§ 1014.1 Scope of regulations. ( a ) These regulations shall apply only to claims asserted under the Federal Tort Claims Act, as amended, accruing on or after January 18, 1967, for money damages against the United States for injury to, or loss of, property or personal injury or death caused by the negligent or wrongful act or omission of any employee of the Department of Energy (DOE) while acting within the scope of office or employment.
( b ) The terms *DOE, Department,* and *Department of Energy* as used in this part mean the agency established by the Department of Energy Organization Act (Pub. L. 95-91), 42 U.S.C. 7101, *et seq.,* including the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, but do not include any contractor of the Department.
( c ) The regulations in this part supplement the Attorney General's regulations in part 14 of chapter 1 of title 28 CFR as amended. Those regulations, including subsequent amendments thereto, and the regulations in this part apply to the consideration by DOE of administrative claims under the Federal Tort Claims Act.
Case 1:06-cr-00197-MEF-CSC Document 17 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 1 of 4
Case 1:06-cr-00197-MEF-CSC Document 17 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 2 of 4
Case 1:06-cr-00197-MEF-CSC Document 17 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 3 of 4
Case 1:06-cr-00197-MEF-CSC Document 17 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 4 of 4
Case 1:06-cr-00197-MEF-CSC Document 17-2 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:06-cr-00197-MEF-CSC Document 17-3 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 1 of 1
Case 1:06-cr-00197-MEF-CSC Document 17-4 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 1 of 1
#### § 987.66 Certification of reports.

All reports submitted to the Committee as required in this part shall be certified to the United States Department of Agriculture and to the Committee as to the completeness and correctness of the information therein.
§ 36.57 Radiation surveys. ( a ) A radiation survey of the area outside the shielding of the radiation room of a panoramic irradiator must be conducted with the sources in the exposed position before the facility starts to operate. A radiation survey of the area above the pool of pool irradiators must be conducted after the sources are loaded but before the facility starts to operate. Additional radiation surveys of the shielding must be performed at intervals not to exceed 3 years and before resuming operation after addition of new sources or any modification to the radiation room shielding or structure that might increase dose rates.
( b ) If the radiation levels specified in § 36.25 are exceeded, the facility must be modified to comply with the requirements in § 36.25.
( c ) Portable radiation survey meters must be calibrated at least annually to an accuracy of ±20 percent for the gamma energy of the sources in use. The calibration must be done at two points on each scale or, for digital instruments, at one point per decade over the range that will be used. Portable radiation survey meters must be of a type that does not saturate and read zero at high radiation dose rates.
( d ) Water from the irradiator pool, other potentially contaminated liquids, and sediments from pool vacuuming must be monitored for radioactive contamination before release to unrestricted areas. Radioactive concentrations must not exceed those specified in 10 CFR part 20, table 2, column 2 or table 3 of appendix B, “Annual Limits on Intake (ALIs) and Derived Air Concentrations (DACs) of Radionuclides for Occupational Exposure; Effluent Concentrations; Concentrations for Release to Sewerage.”
( e ) Before releasing resins for unrestricted use, they must be monitored before release in an area with a background level less than 0.5 microsievert (0.05 millirem) per hour. The resins may be released only if the survey does not detect radiation levels above background radiation levels. The survey meter used must be capable of detecting radiation levels of 0.5 microsievert (0.05 millirem) per hour.