alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV 

109TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 243

Recognizing the Coast Guard, the Coast Guard Auxiliary, and the National 

Safe Boating Council for their efforts to promote National Safe Boating 

Week. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 27, 2005

Mr. COOPER (for himself, Mr. TAYLOR of Mississippi, and Mr. SHAW) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 

Transportation and Infrastructure 

RESOLUTION

Recognizing the Coast Guard, the Coast Guard Auxiliary, 

and the National Safe Boating Council for their efforts 

to promote National Safe Boating Week.

Whereas recreational boating is one of our Nation’s most 

popular pastimes, with an estimated 78,000,000 recreational boaters in the United States and nearly 

13,000,000 recreational vessels registered; 

Whereas the number of recreational boating fatalities has declined by more than half since 1970, thanks to the increased use of life jackets, cooperative boating safety education, enforcement efforts between the Coast Guard and 

State governments, and safer vessels and equipment 

manufactured in accordance with Coast Guard standards; 
2

•HRES 243 IH 

Whereas recreational boating accidents have nevertheless 

claimed the lives of 703 Americans in 2003, more than 

half of whose lives could have been saved with the proper 

use of a personal flotation device; 

Whereas a continued emphasis on accident prevention can reduce recreational boating fatalities still further, and in 

particular deaths by drowning, which remain the leading 

cause of recreational boating fatalities; and 

Whereas the National Safe Boating Council, with the support 

of the Coast Guard and the Coast Guard Auxiliary, has 

proposed designating the week of May 21 through 27, 

2005, as National Safe Boating Week: Now, therefore, be 

it

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives—

2 (1) supports initiatives for recreational boating 

3 safety education and accident prevention to minimize 

4 the number of annual recreational boating fatalities; 

5 (2) recognizes the Coast Guard, the Coast 

6 Guard Auxiliary, and the National Safe Boating 

7 Council for their efforts each year during May to 

8 highlight the importance of safe recreational boat9 ing; and 

10 (3) supports the goals of National Safe Boating 

11 Week.

Æ
SUBPART 45.1 – GENERAL    *(Revised September 19, 2016 through PROCLTR 16-09)* **Parent topic:** PART 45 – GOVERNMENT PROPERTY45.101 Definitions.    *“*          *Property Administrator”*See 1.670.       *“Stock Provided to Vendor (SPTV)”*is SAP terminology that identifies and tracks items or components issued to DLA Distribution or a contractor for assembly or modification to make an end-item.   Examples include items or components required for kits, uniforms, MREs, and government furnished material.       *“Vendor Managed Inventory (VMI)”* is used to characterize various programs in which Government-owned property is managed by the contractor.45.103 General.     45.103-70 Furnishing Government Property to Contractors.    (1) For DLA managed items, the product specialist makes the determination and documents the requirement in the Material Master. The requirement will be identified on the PR.       (2) DLR sites shall follow the processes and systems at the Military Services sites.45.105 Contractors’ Property Management System Compliance.    (a) Conduct an analysis of the contractor’s property management policies, procedures, practices, and systems, as frequently as conditions warrant, in accordance with DoDI 4161.02, Accountability and Management of Government Contract Property                       ,          dated April 27, 2012 (https://www.esd.whs.mil/Portals/54/Documents/DD/issuances/dodi/416102p.pdf); and the       DoD Guidebook for Contract Property Administration, dated December 2014 (https://www.dau.edu/guidebooks/Shared%20Documents%20HTML/Guidebook%20for%20Contract%20Property%20Administration.aspx).
#### O’DOWD et al., Appellants, v. R. H. CASEY, Inc., Respondent.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

June 19, 1914.)

Action by Margaret O’Dowd and another against R. H. Casey, Incorporated.

C. Trosk, of New York City, for appellants.

C. S. Petrasch, of New York City, for respondent.

No opinion.

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Order filed.
ex10-151a.htm












Supplemental Agreement No. 19





to





Purchase Agreement No. 1980





between





The Boeing Company





and





AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC





Relating to Boeing Model 777-223IGW Aircraft









THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT, entered into as of _________________________, 2009, (Supplemental Agreement Number 19) by and between THE BOEING COMPANY, a Delaware corporation with offices in Seattle, Washington, (Boeing) and American Airlines, Inc. (Customer);





RECITALS:





1.           Boeing and Customer entered into Purchase Agreement No. 1980 dated as of October 31, 1997, as amended and supplemented (capitalized terms used herein without definition shall have the meanings specified therefor in such Purchase Agreement) relating to Boeing Model 777-223IGW
aircraft (the Purchase Agreement).





2.           In Letter Agreement No. 6-1162-AKP-109R1 to the Purchase Agreement, among other things, Boeing agreed to issue [CONFIDENTIAL PORTION OMITTED AND FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE COMMISSION PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT].  Boeing and Customer now wish
to amend such letter agreement to set forth [CONFIDENTIAL PORTION OMITTED AND FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE COMMISSION PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT].






P.A. No. 1980                                                           SA-19





BOEING PROPRIETARY






  



  







  









In consideration of the mutual covenants herein contained, the parties agree to amend the Purchase Agreement as follows:





1.           The Table of Contents of the Purchase Agreement is deleted in its entirety and replaced by a revised Table of Contents, copy attached, to set forth Letter Agreement No. 6-1162-AKP-109R2 entitled Business Considerations and the appropriate SA-19 references.





2.           Letter Agreement No. 6-1162-AKP-109R1 entitled Business Considerations is deleted in its entirety and is replaced by revised letter agreement 6-1162-AKP-109R2, copy attached, to set forth [CONFIDENTIAL PORTION OMITTED AND FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE COMMISSION PURSUANT TO A
REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT] due to Customer under Letter Agreement 6-1162-AKP-109R2).





The Purchase Agreement will be deemed to be amended to the extent provided herein and as so amended will continue in full force and effect.  In the event of any inconsistency between the above provisions and the provisions contained in the referenced exhibits to this Supplemental Agreement, the terms of the exhibits will control.





EXECUTED IN DUPLICATE as of the day and year first above written.





THE BOEING COMPANY                                                                           AMERICAN
AIRLINES, INC.













By:                                                                    By:                                             









Its:    Attorney-In-Fact                                                                    Its:                                              






P.A. No. 1980                                                           SA-19





BOEING PROPRIETARY
2031.109-70 Contract clauses.

The contracting officer shall insert the clause at 2052.231-70, Precontract Costs, in all cost type

contracts when costs in connection with work under the contract will be incurred by the contractor

before the effective date of the contract. Approval for use of this clause must be obtained at one

level above the contracting officer.

Parent topic: Subpart 2031.1 - Applicability
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

WILLIE MCNAIR, )

)

Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2:06-cv-695-WKW

)

RICHARD ALLEN, et al., )

)

Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. )

____________________________________

)

JAMES CALLAHAN, )

)

Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2:06-cv-919-WKW

)

RICHARD ALLEN, et al., )

)

Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs. )

ORDER

Upon consideration of Plaintiff McNair’s Unopposed Motion for an Order Continuing

Certain Pre-Trial Dates (Doc. # 172), it is ORDERED that the motion is granted. The deadline for

the plaintiff’s response is continued from May 12, 2008, to May 19, 2008. The defendant may file

a reply brief on or before May 27, 2008.

DONE this 9th day of May, 2008.

 /s/ W. Keith Watkins 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 2:06-cv-00695-WKW-CSC Document 173 Filed 05/09/2008 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

OFFICE OF THE CLERK

POST OFFICE BOX 711

MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA 36101-0711

DEBRA P. HACKETT, CLERK

TELEPHONE (334) 954-3600

October 23, 2006

NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY

To: Attorney Johnnie Graham

From: Clerk’s Office

Case Style: Burkett v. McCray et al

Case Number: 1:06-cv-00775-DRB

Referenced Pleading: Petition to appear pro hac vice

Docket Entry # 17

Certificate of Service was not signed; or the pleading contains no certificate of service

This deficiency must be corrected within ten (10) days from this date. You must file a signed

certificate of service for the referenced pleading containing your original signature reflecting

that this pleading was served on all parties.

DO NOT E-FILE YOUR CORRECTION.......IT MUST BE MAILED TO THE CLERK’S

OFFICE, ALONG WITH A COPY OF THIS NOTICE.

Case 1:06-cv-00775-TFM Document 19 Filed 10/23/2006 Page 1 of 1
PGI 203.1 -SAFEGUARDS       No Current PGI Text.    **Parent topic:** PGI Part 203 - IMPROPER BUSINESS PRACTICES AND PERSONAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
§ 36.25 Shielding. ( a ) The radiation dose rate in areas that are normally occupied during operation of a panoramic irradiator may not exceed 0.02 millisievert (2 millirems) per hour at any location 30 centimeters or more from the wall of the room when the sources are exposed. The dose rate must be averaged over an area not to exceed 100 square centimeters having no linear dimension greater than 20 cm. Areas where the radiation dose rate exceeds 0.02 millisievert (2 millirems) per hour must be locked, roped off, or posted.
( b ) The radiation dose at 30 centimeters over the edge of the pool of a pool irradiator may not exceed 0.02 millisievert (2 millirems) per hour when the sources are in the fully shielded position.
( c ) The radiation dose rate at 1 meter from the shield of a dry-source-storage panoramic irradiator when the source is shielded may not exceed 0.02 millisievert (2 millirems) per hour and at 5 centimeters from the shield may not exceed 0.2 millisievert (20 millirems) per hour.
2007-1599.

#### State v. Long.

Seneca App. No. 13-07-20. Reported at 116 Ohio St.3d 1441, 2007-Ohio-6518, 877 N.E.2d 991. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.

Moyer, C.J., dissents.
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 350 Introduced in House (IH)]

109th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 350

  Expressing appreciation to the people and Government of Canada for 
 their long history of friendship and cooperation with the people and 
    Government of the United States and congratulating Canada as it 
                       celebrates ``Canada Day''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 30, 2005

Mr. Stupak (for himself, Mr. Sweeney, Mr. Bass, Mr. McNulty, Mr. Smith 
of Washington, Mr. Dingell, Mr. Allen, Mr. McDermott, Mr. Michaud, Mr. 
    Peterson of Minnesota, and Mr. Kildee) submitted the following 
   resolution; which was referred to the Committee on International 
                               Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Expressing appreciation to the people and Government of Canada for 
 their long history of friendship and cooperation with the people and 
    Government of the United States and congratulating Canada as it 
                       celebrates ``Canada Day''.

Whereas the United States has a long-cherished economic, social, and political 
        partnership with Canada;
Whereas the United States and Canada share not only a 5,500 mile border, but 
        also common ideals and cultural affinities;
Whereas in this era of heightened security, the United States and Canada have 
        renewed cooperative efforts to safeguard the movement of people and 
        goods, improve information-sharing, and strengthen border infrastructure 
        and technology; and
Whereas July 1st of each year is officially celebrated in Canada as ``Canada 
        Day'' in recognition of the anniversary of the establishment of the 
        union of the British North American provinces in a federation called 
        Canada: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved,  That the House of Representatives--
            (1) expresses its appreciation to the people and Government 
        of Canada for their long history of friendship and cooperation 
        with the people and Government of the United States; and
            (2) congratulates Canada as it celebrates its annual 
        ``Canada Day''.
                                 <all>
```
#### BENJAMIN et al. v. BROWNSTEIN et al.

(Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department.

June 5, 1914.)

Action by Ephraim Benjamin and others against Daniel J. Brownstein and others.

No opinion. Application denied, with $10 costs. Order signed. See, also, 79 Misc. Rep, 84, 139 N. Y. Supp. 318.
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.3






CONFIRMATION OF IRREVOCABLE LETTER OF CREDIT NO. 2018-10






March 9, 2018






Employers Preferred Insurance Company
10375 Professional Circle
Reno, NV 89521-4802


Greetings:


The Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco (the "Bank") hereby confirms that, at the request and for the account of Employers Preferred Insurance Company, Reno, Nevada (the "Member"), Letter of Credit No. 2018-10, with terms as specified below (the "Credit") will be issued by the Bank on the Effective Date indicated below to the Beneficiary named below, subject to the Member’s continuing compliance with the Bank’s Advances and Security Agreement and other applicable agreements, as well as with the Bank’s Credit Program and specific eligibility or documentation requirements and policies applicable to specific Bank products. Also, statutory or regulatory conditions (including regulatory limits on Bank credit to capital-deficient savings institutions) may apply. The Credit is being issued pursuant to the Letter of Credit Reimbursement Agreement (the "Reimbursement Agreement") between the Bank and the Member. The rights and obligations of the Bank and the Member with respect to each other in regard to the Credit are as set forth in the Reimbursement Agreement and herein.


	
			
	A.
	Beneficiary Name and Address:
	Insurance Commissioner, State of California
c/o Chief, Securities Transaction Unit 
300 Capitol Mall, Suite 14th Floor
Sacramento, CA 95814

	B.
	Type of Transaction:
	Liquidity

	C.
	Maximum Credit Amount:
	$50,000,000

	D.
	Effective Date of Credit:
	March 9, 2018

	E.
	Expiration Date of Credit:
	March 31, 2019 (Evergreen with automatic one (1) year extensions unless the Bank notifies the beneficiary at least sixty (60) days prior to the then applicable Expiration Date of its election not to renew.)






When issued, the Credit is irrevocable and, except with the written consent of the Bank, nontransferable except as specifically set forth in the Credit. Pursuant to the Bank's policy, the Member is required to reimburse the Bank for any attorneys' fees, accountants' fees, or other out‐of‐pocket costs associated with the Bank's issuance, amendment, or maintenance of the Credit.


The original Credit will be provided to the Beneficiary at its above address.


The Member covenants with and represents and warrants to the Bank that the issuance of the Credit has been requested in connection with the type of transaction described above, and that the terms set forth above are valid and are those that the Member requested and by which the Member agrees to be bound.















Please sign this Confirmation where indicated below by an authorized signer(s) for the Member and return it to the Bank immediately.


FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK OF SAN FRANCISCO


	
		
	By
	/s/ Andrea Brunetti

	 
	 

	Title
	VP Legal

	 
	 

	By
	/s/ Ira Chin

	 
	 

	Title
	VP Member Financial Services






EMPLOYERS PREFERRED INSURANCE COMPANY


	
				
	By
	/s/ Lenard T. Ormsby
	 
	/s/ Matthew Hendricksen

	 
	 
	 
	 

	Title
	Asst. Secretary
	 
	VP Treasury & Investments
###### Editorial Note on Part 30

#### Editorial Note:

Nomenclature changes to part 30 appear at 79 FR 75739, Dec. 19, 2014.

#### § 30.5 Interpretations.

Except as specifically authorized by the Commission in writing, no interpretation of the meaning of the regulations in this part and parts 31 through 36 and 39 by any officer or employee of the Commission other than a written interpretation by the General Counsel will be recognized to be binding upon the Commission.

[30 FR 8185, June 26, 1965, as amended at 43 FR 6921, Feb. 17, 1978; 52 FR 8241, Mar. 17, 1987; 58 FR 7736, Feb. 9, 1993]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

M IDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABA M A

OFFICE OF THE CLERK

POST OFFICE BOX 711

MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA 36101-0711

DEBRA P. HACKETT, CLERK

TELEPHONE (334) 954-3600

November 9, 2006

NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL

Re: Contigroup Companies, Inc. v. Foster

Civil Action No. 2:06-cv-00769-MHT

Pursuant to the Stipulation of Dismissal with prejudice filed by the Plaintiff on 11/8/06, this

case has been closed and removed from the docket of this court.

 

Case 2:06-cv-00769-MHT-DRB Document 5 Filed 11/09/2006 Page 1 of 1
§ 20.1501 General. ( a ) Each licensee shall make or cause to be made, surveys of areas, including the subsurface, that— ( 1 ) May be necessary for the licensee to comply with the regulations in this part; and
( 2 ) Are reasonable under the circumstances to evaluate— ( i ) The magnitude and extent of radiation levels; and
( ii ) Concentrations or quantities of residual radioactivity; and
( iii ) The potential radiological hazards of the radiation levels and residual radioactivity detected.
( b ) Notwithstanding § 20.2103(a) of this part, records from surveys describing the location and amount of subsurface residual radioactivity identified at the site must be kept with records important for decommissioning, and such records must be retained in accordance with §§ 30.35(g), 40.36(f), 50.75(g), 70.25(g), or 72.30(d), as applicable.
( c ) The licensee shall ensure that instruments and equipment used for quantitative radiation measurements (e.g., dose rate and effluent monitoring) are calibrated periodically for the radiation measured.
( d ) All personnel dosimeters (except for direct and indirect reading pocket ionization chambers and those dosimeters used to measure the dose to the extremities) that require processing to determine the radiation dose and that are used by licensees to comply with § 20.1201, with other applicable provisions of this chapter, or with conditions specified in a license must be processed and evaluated by a dosimetry processor— ( 1 ) Holding current personnel dosimetry accreditation from the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP) of the National Institute of Standards and Technology; and
( 2 ) Approved in this accreditation process for the type of radiation or radiations included in the NVLAP program that most closely approximates the type of radiation or radiations for which the individual wearing the dosimeter is monitored.
[56 FR 23398, May 21, 1991, as amended at 63 FR 39482, July 23, 1998; 76 FR 35564, June 17, 2011]
#### Steine *v.*Silver *et al.*

July 21, 1913.

Mortgage foreclosure. Before Judge Walker. Warren superior court. April 25, 1912.

*F. P. Davis*and *L. D. McGregor,*for plaintiff.

*F. T. Shurley*and *M. L. Felts,*for defendants.

Beck, J.

The exceptions to the charge of the court are without merit, and there is abundant evidence to support the verdict. *Allen*v. *Pearce,*84 *Ga.*606*(10 S.*E. 1015); *Jones*v. *Dannenberg Company, 112 Ga. 426 (37 S.*E. 729, 52 L. R. A. 271).

*Judgment affirmed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Nuclear Regulatory Commission

# AGENCY:

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

# ACTION:

Notice of renewal of the Charter of the Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards (ACRS).

# SUMMARY:

The Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards was established by Section 29 of the Atomic Energy Act (AEA) of 1954, as amended. Its purpose is to provide advice to the Commission with regard to the hazards of proposed or existing reactor facilities, to review each application for a construction permit or operating license for certain facilities specified in the AEA, and such other duties as the Commission may request. The AEA as amended by PL 100-456 also specifies that the Defense Nuclear Safety Board may obtain the advice and recommendations of the ACRS.

Membership on the Committee includes individuals experienced in reactor operations, management; probabilistic risk assessment; analysis of reactor accident phenomena; design of nuclear power plant structures, systems and components; materials science; and mechanical, civil, and electrical engineering.

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has determined that renewal of the charter for the ACRS until December 10, 2012 is in the public interest in connection with the statutory responsibilities assigned to the ACRS. This action is being taken in accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Andrew L. Bates, Office of the Secretary, NRC, Washington, DC 20555;                         *telephone:*                         (301) 415-1963 or at                         *ALB@NRC.GOV.*

Dated: December 10, 2010.

Andrew L. Bates,

Advisory Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 2010-31590 Filed 12-15-10; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7590-01-P