alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 109th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 124 Engrossed in House (EH)]

                 In the House of Representatives, U.S.,

                                                         March 1, 2005.
Whereas the 11th cycle of the daily learning of the 2,711 pages in the 
        Babylonian Talmud, through the Daf Hayomi study program will culminate 
        on March 1, 2005, the 20th day of Adar I 5765 in the Jewish calendar;
Whereas this will complete a formidable 7\1/2\ year educational and daily study 
        cycle introduced in 1923 at Agudath Israel's first International 
        Congress in Vienna by Polish Rabbi Meir Shapiro, whose purpose was ``to 
        enhance the sense of unity of Jews worldwide'';
Whereas Jews throughout the world will be celebrating joyously in honor of the 
        celebration, including 120,000 Jews in North America, and more than 
        50,000 in 3 major locations in the New York area will be technologically 
        and spiritually linked to hundreds of similar celebrations throughout 
        the world;
Whereas the 10th Daf Yomi cycle was completed on September 28, 1997 with 26,000 
        people at Madison Square Garden linked by satellite to dozens of 
        communities around the world;
Whereas the teachers and students of the Talmud have displayed the remarkable 
        ability to take individual efforts and combine them in striving toward a 
        common vision and goal; and
Whereas this monumental achievement in study, dedication, perseverance, and 
        persistence is a lesson for contemporary society and for people of good 
        will everywhere: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives congratulates the students and 
teachers of the Daf Yomi program on the occasion of their celebration of the 
completion of the 11th cycle of the Daf Hayomi, and wishes them well on 
beginning the 12th cycle.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
rrEHTCF 

-O-a^rio;.; 

•:0 A O Ul: 

January 20, 2012 

U. S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Management System, M-30 

West Building ground floor 

Room W12-140 

1200 New Jersey Avenue SE Room W12-140 

Washington, DC. 20590 

Dear Docket Management System: 

RE: Docket Number FAA-2003-16714 

In response to your December 30, 2011 notice: 

Ward Air Inc. hereby requests the FAA extend Exemption Number 8295D from 14 CFR 

(FAR Section) - 135.203(a)(1) beyond its April 30, 2012 expiration date. 

Thank you. 

Sincerely, 

{JA-T^ 

Christopher Breinig 

Director of Operations 

8991 YandukinDr. 

Juneau. Alaska 99801 

E-mail chris(gjwardair.com 

907-789-0890 
Date: 12/30/2011 

Exemption No: 8295D from 14 CFR (FAR Section) -

Part: 135.203(a)(1) 

will expire on 04/30/2012. If appropriate, .^iease submit 

your request to extend this exemption (including the 

docket number FAA-2003-16714) within 30 days of 

the date of this notice. Otherwise, the FAA may not be 

able to process your request for extension before the 

expiration date. You may either submit youf request 

electronically through the internet using the Docket 

Management System web site at: 

http://Regulations.gov/ or mail your request to: 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Operations, M-30 

West Building ground floor, 

Room W12-140 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Christopher Breinig 

Director of Operations 

Ward Air, Inc. 

8991 Yandukin Dr 

Juneau, AK 

99801 

Submission to other locations may delay processing. 

Any request for extension must meet the 

requirements of 14 CFR part 11. If you have already 

requested an extension for this exemption or no longer 

need this exemption, please ignore this notice. 

/J.J>.M.J..I./f..,.../f).././l>..l.../f..jMj \.nlU
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

vs. ) CR. NO. 2:06CR209-WKW

)

BRIDGET Y. TAYLOR )

ORDER

Pursuant to the defendant’s Notice of Intent to Change Plea (Doc. #18) filed on

October 4, 2006, it is hereby

ORDERED that the defendant’s change of plea hearing be and is hereby set for

October 10, 2006, at 9:30 a.m., in Courtroom 4B, United States Courthouse Complex, One

Church Street, Montgomery, Alabama. 

The Clerk is directed to provide a court reporter for this proceeding. If the defendant

is in custody, the United States Marshal or the person having custody of the defendant shall

produce the defendant for the proceeding.

Done this 5 day of October, 2006. th

 /s/Charles S. Coody 

CHARLES S. COODY

CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:06-cr-00209-MHT-CSC Document 19 Filed 10/05/2006 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

OFFICE OF THE CLERK

POST OFFICE BOX 711

MONTGOMERY, ALABAMA 36101-0711

DEBRA P. HACKETT, CLERK

TELEPHONE (334) 954-3600

December 17, 2007

NOTICE OF CORRECTION

From: Clerk’s Office

Case Style: J.B. v. Wood 

Case Number: 2:06-cv-00755-MHT

This Notice of Correction was filed in the referenced case this date to correct the PDF

document previously attached by E-Filer. 

The correct PDF document is attached to this notice for your review. Reference is made to

document # 84 filed on December 17, 2007.

Case 2:06-cv-00755-MHT-CSC Document 85 Filed 12/17/2007 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

NORTHERN DIVISION

J.B., a minor child, by and through *

his next friend, ADDIE WARD, on *

behalf of himself and all others *

similarly situated; *

*

Plaintiff, *

vs. * CASE NO:02:06cv755-MHT

*

*

WALTER WOOD, in his individual *

capacity, *

*

Defendant. *

J.B., a minor child, by and through *

his next friend, ADDIE WARD, on *

behalf of himself and all others *

similarly situated; *

*

Plaintiff, *

vs. * CASE NO:02:06cv908-MEF

*

*

WALTER WOOD, in his individual *

capacity, *

*

Defendant. *

CONFLICT DISCLOSURE STATEMENT

COMES NOW J.B., the plaintiff, in the above the above-captioned matter, and in

accordance with the order of this Court, making the following disclosure concerning

parent companies, subsidiaries, partners, limited liability entity members and managers,

trustees (but not trust beneficiaries), affiliates, or similar entities reportable under the

Case 2:06-cv-00755-MHT-CSC Document 85-2 Filed 12/17/2007 Page 1 of 3
provisions of the Middle District of Alabama’s General Order No. 3047:

_X__ This party is an individual, or

____ This party is a governmental entity, or

____ There are no entities to be reported, or

____ The following entities and their relationship to the party are hereby

reported:

Reportable Entity Relationship to Party

________________________ _________________________

________________________ _________________________

________________________ _________________________

________________________ _________________________

12/17/2007 /s/Robert D. Drummond, Jr.

Date Robert D. Drummond, Jr.(DRU004)

323 De La Mare Ave.

Fairhope, AL 36532

251-990-6249

/s/Michael J. Crow

Michael J. Crow (CRO039)

Attorney for the Plaintiff

BEASLEY. ALLEN, CROW,

METHVIN, PORTIS &MILES

P.O. 4160

Montgomery, AL 36103-4160

334-269-2343

Case 2:06-cv-00755-MHT-CSC Document 85-2 Filed 12/17/2007 Page 2 of 3
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on this 17th day of December, 2007, the foregoing was

electronically filed with the Clerk of this Court thereby providing notice to counsel for the

defendant, T. Dudley Perry, Esq., P.O. Box 66, Mt. Meigs, AL 36057

s//Robert D. Drummond, Jr.

Case 2:06-cv-00755-MHT-CSC Document 85-2 Filed 12/17/2007 Page 3 of 3
#### § 1303.101 Scope

This part sets forth the policies and procedures of the U.S. Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board (Board) regarding public access to documents under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552. The provisions in the Act shall take precedence over any part of the Board's regulations in conflict with the Act. This part gives the procedures the public may use to inspect and obtain copies of Board records under the FOIA, including administrative procedures which must be exhausted before a request invokes the jurisdiction of an appropriate United States District Court for the Board's failure to respond to a proper request within the statutory time limits, for a denial of Board records or challenges to the adequacy of a search, or for denial of fee waiver.
Editorial Note on Part 26
Editorial Note: Nomenclature changes to part 26 appear at 87 FR 71455, Nov. 22, 2022.

§ 26.135 Split specimens. ( a ) If the FFD program follows split-specimen procedures, as described in § 26.113, the licensee testing facility shall analyze aliquots of the specimen for the licensee's or other entity's purposes as described in this part. Except as provided in paragraph (b) in this section, the licensee testing facility shall store Bottles A and B of the specimen in a secure manner until the facility has finished testing. If the initial validity and drug test results are negative and the specimen in Bottle A will not be forwarded to the HHS-certified laboratory, the licensee testing facility may discard both Bottle A and Bottle B. If any test results are positive or indicate that the specimen is of questionable validity, the licensee testing facility shall forward Bottle A to the HHS-certified laboratory for testing and shall retain Bottle B in secure storage, under the requirements of § 26.159(i), or may forward it to the HHS-certified laboratory for storage.
( b ) If the MRO confirms any positive, adulterated, or substituted result for a specimen in Bottle A, based on the results of confirmatory testing at an HHS-certified laboratory, and the licensee testing facility has elected to retain Bottle B of the specimen, and the donor requests testing of the specimen in Bottle B, as permitted under § 26.165(b), the MRO shall ensure that Bottle B is forwarded to an HHS-certified laboratory other than the laboratory that tested the specimen in Bottle A, under the procedures specified in § 26.165(b).
( c ) If the MRO confirms that the specimen in Bottle A is positive, adulterated, substituted, or invalid and the donor does not request that Bottle B be tested, the licensee or other entity shall ensure that Bottle B is maintained in long-term frozen storage (−20 °C (−4 °F) or less) for a minimum of 1 year. If a licensee testing facility elects to retain the specimen in Bottle B, rather than forwarding it to the HHS-certified laboratory with Bottle A, the licensee testing facility shall ensure proper storage conditions in the event of a prolonged power failure. After the end of 1 year, the licensee or other entity may discard Bottle B, with the exception that the licensee testing facility shall retain any specimens under legal challenge, or as requested by the NRC, until the specimen is no longer needed.
[73 FR 17176, Mar. 31, 2008, as amended at 79 FR 66602, Nov. 10, 2014]
#### Ralph Fullerton, Respondent, v. Jamestown Spinning Company, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant. Kling Factories, Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent.

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with

costs. Memorandum: The trial court charged the jury that if they found that the defendant, 'Spinning Company, was negligent because of a violation either of the Labor Law or the Rules of the Board of Standards and Appeals notice was not required. This was error. It is not claimed that the railing was defective in construction. Notice that the condition was known to be unsafe, or was discoverable in the exercise of reasonable care was a necessary element to a recovery. *(Zinsenheim*v. *Congregation Beth David,*10 A D 2d 501; *Zaulich*v. *Thompkins Sq. Holding Co.,*10 A D 2d 492.) The record, however, establishes as a matter of law that the Spinning Company did have *736notice. (Appeal from judgment of Chautauqua Trial Term, in negligence action.) Present—'Goldman, P. J., Marsh, Witmer, Moule and Henry, JJ.
Exhibit No. 12.

Questar Pipeline Company and Subsidiaries
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                            12 months ended September 30,
                                                    1999        1998
                                                (Dollars in Thousands)
<S>                                             <C>         <C>
Earnings

Income before income taxes                          $41,359     $40,549
Plus debt expense                                    16,518      14,062
Plus allowance for borrowed
   funds used during construction                     2,257         448
Plus interest portion of rental expense                 212         312
                                                    $60,346     $55,371

Fixed Charges

Debt expense                                        $16,518     $14,062
Plus allowance for borrowed
   funds used during construction                     2,257         448
Plus interest portion of rental expense                 212         312
                                                    $18,987     $14,822

Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges                     3.18        3.74
</TABLE>
PGI 201.109 Statutory acquisition-related

dollar thresholds - adjustment for inflation.

Statutory acquisition-related dollar thresholds are reviewed every 5 years to calculate adjustment

for inflation, as required by Section 807 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year

2005 (Public Law 108-375). The matrix showing the most recent escalation adjustments of statutory

acquisition-related dollar thresholds in the DFARS is available here.

Parent topic: PGI 201.1 -PURPOSE, AUTHORITY, ISSUANCE
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA, EASTERN DIVISION

OWEN J. ROGAL, D.D.S., )

P.C., )

)

Plaintiff, )

) CIVIL ACTION NO.

v. ) 3:06cv711-MHT

) 

SKILSTAF, INC., )

)

Defendant. )

ORDER

It is ORDERED that the objection (Doc. No. 62) is set

for submission, without oral argument, on August 17,

2007, with all briefs due by said date.

DONE, this the 13th day of August, 2007.

 /s/ Myron H. Thompson 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Case 3:06-cv-00711-MHT-WC Document 63 Filed 08/13/2007 Page 1 of 1
Dear CLerk,

This letter is being written for the following reason(s). I was never given notice that the

Court of Criminal Appeals received my application for writ of Habeas Corpus Fursuant to Article

11.07 Code of Criminal Rircedure. Had I received any notice that the Court of Criminal Appeals

received my writ, I would not be writting this letter. I never was inforriBd of the decision that

the Court of Criminal Appeals handed down, therefore I am surprized of what ever decision it may

be. Should I be denied relief, I request to be given sore form of notice with the date in which

that decision was made. Thank you for your time in advance to this matter. Ify information is as

follows.

Court of Criimnal Appeals

WR-75,964-01

Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus, Fllsd 3/10/2011

Best Regards;

Candy H. Hughes#1596685

Hughes Unit

Rt.2 Box 4400

Gatesville,Texas.76597

U.S.A

12-11-2015

A

RECEIVED IN

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

DEC 17 2015

Abel Acosta, Clerk

srAWMTO

DATE
§ 36.27 Fire protection. ( a ) The radiation room at a panoramic irradiator must have heat and smoke detectors. The detectors must activate an audible alarm. The alarm must be capable of alerting a person who is prepared to summon assistance promptly. The sources must automatically become fully shielded if a fire is detected.
( b ) The radiation room at a panoramic irradiator must be equipped with a fire extinguishing system capable of extinguishing a fire without the entry of personnel into the room. The system for the radiation room must have a shut-off valve to control flooding into unrestricted areas.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                          5
<MULTIPLIER>                       1,000

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                            9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                             SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   93,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               104,000
<PP&E>                                       5,373,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               1,731,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,746,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,355,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       580,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  (2,189,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,746,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  622,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             415,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (1,004,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (1,004,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (1,004,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.02)



</TABLE>
Case 2:06-cv-00676-ID-DRB Document 2 Filed 08/08/2006 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:06-cv-00676-ID-DRB Document 2 Filed 08/08/2006 Page 2 of 2
# Subpart 1823.2—Energy and Water Efficiency and Renewable Energy

**Parent topic:**PART 1823—ENVIRONMENT, ENERGY AND WATER EFFICIENCY, RENEWABLE ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES, OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY, AND DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE

## 1823.271 NASA Solicitation provision and contract clause.

Insert the clause at 1852.223–76, Federal Automotive Statistical Tool Reporting, in solicitations and contracts requiring contractor operation of Government-owned or -leased motor vehicles, including, but not limited to, interagency fleet management system (IFMS) vehicles authorized in accordance with FAR 51.2.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA )

)

v ) CR. NO. 3:06CR210-MEF

)

MELISSA WARD )

ORDER

Upon consideration of the motion to continue or reschedule pretrial conference filed

by the defendant, it is

ORDERED that the motion to continue be and is hereby GRANTED. The pretrial

conference presently set for 1:00 p.m. be and is hereby RESET to 4:00 p.m. on November

13, 2006, in Courtroom 4B, United States Courthouse, One Church Street, Montgomery,

Alabama. If the defendant is in custody and desires to be present, not later than three days

prior to the proceeding counsel for the defendant shall so notify the United States Marshal

or the person having custody of the defendant who shall produce the defendant for the

hearing.

Done this 31 day of October, 2006. st

 /s/Charles S. Coody 

CHARLES S. COODY

CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 3:06-cr-00210-MEF-CSC Document 14 Filed 10/31/2006 Page 1 of 1
# SUBCHAPTER D—SOCIOECONOMIC PROGRAMS   

- PART 1219—SMALL BUSINESS PROGRAMS 
- PART 1222—APPLICATION OF LABOR LAWS TO GOVERNMENT ACQUISITIONS 
- PART 1223—ENVIRONMENT, ENERGY AND WATER EFFICIENCY, RENEWABLE ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES, OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY, AND DRUG–FREE WORKPLACE 
- PART 1224—PROTECTION OF PRIVACY AND FREEDOM OF INFORMATION 

- PART 1219—SMALL BUSINESS PROGRAMS    - Subpart 1219.2—Policies     - 1219.201   General policy.
    - 1219.201-70   Procurement goals for small business.
    - 1219.202   Specific policies.
    - 1219.202-70   Procurement Forecast.
  - Subpart 1219.4—Cooperation With the Small Business Administration     - 1219.401   General.
  - Subpart 1219.5—Set-Asides for Small Business     - 1219.501   General.
    - 1219.502-8   Rejecting Small Business Administration recommendations.
    - 1219.502-9   Withdrawing or modifying small business set-asides.
  - Subpart 1219.7—The Small Business Subcontracting Program     - 1219.705   Responsibilities of the contracting officer under the subcontracting assistance program.
    - 1219.705-6   Postaward responsibilities of the contracting officer.
  - Subpart 1219.8—Contracting With the Small Business Administration (the 8(a) Program)     - 1219.800   General.
    - 1219.815   Release for non-8(a) procurement.
  - Subpart 1219.70—DOT Mentor-Protégé Program     - 1219.7000   General.
- PART 1222—APPLICATION OF LABOR LAWS TO GOVERNMENT ACQUISITIONS    - Subpart 1222.1—Basic Labor Policies     - 1222.101   Labor relations.
    - 1222.101-70   Admittance of union representatives to DOT installations.
    - 1222.101-71   Contract clauses.
  - Subpart 1222.8—Equal Employment Opportunity     - 1222.808   Complaints.
    - 1222.810-70   Contract clause.
- PART 1223—ENVIRONMENT, ENERGY AND WATER EFFICIENCY, RENEWABLE ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES, OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY, AND DRUG–FREE WORKPLACE    - Subpart 1223.3—Hazardous Material Identification and Material Safety Data     - 1223.303   Contract clause.
  - Subpart 1223.70—Safety Requirements for Selected DOT Contracts     - 1223.7000   Contract clauses.
- PART 1224—PROTECTION OF PRIVACY AND FREEDOM OF INFORMATION    - Subpart 1224.1—Protection of Individual Privacy     - 1224.102-70   General.
    - 1224.103   Procedures.
  - Subpart 1224.2—Freedom of Information Act     - 1224.203   Policy.
226 So.2d 523

#### In re Investigation of Alleged Violation of the Code of Governmental Ethics by Roland F. COPPLA, Member of the Louisiana State Police.

No. 49950.

Oct. 1, 1969.

In re: State of Louisiana, Commission on Governmental Ethics, applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Louisiana Commission on Governmental Ethics. '222 So.2d 314.

Writ refused. The judgment is not final.
# SUBCHAPTER B - ACQUISITION PLANNING

- PART 1009 - CONTRACTOR QUALIFICATIONS 

- PART 1009 - CONTRACTOR QUALIFICATIONS    - Subpart 1009.1 - Responsible Prospective Contractors     - 1009.104   Standards.
    - 1009.104-5   Representation and certifications regarding responsibility matters.
  - Subpart 1009.2 - Qualifications Requirements     - 1009.204-70   Contractor publicity.
  - Subpart 1009.70 - Tax Check Requirements     - 1009.7000   Scope of subpart.
    - 1009.7001   Definition.
    - 1009.7003   Policy.
    - 1009.7004   Procedure.
    - 1009.7005   Solicitation provision.
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Clean Systems Technology Group, Ltd.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2003
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Yona Leibowitz Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

3)       The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

4)       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
         the Company.


June 6, 2004
                                                 By: /s/ YONA LEIBOWITZ
                                                 -----------------------
                                                 Name: Yona Leibowitz
                                                 Title:  Chief Financial Officer






<PAGE>